Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-05-09 y'h1T,TIp4. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 y� 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �lhce cao (714)962-2411 May 2, 1990 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 1990 - 7: 30 P,M, 10044 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1 , 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. c[� SeCfetary Tentatively-Scheduled Uocomina Meetings : FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 16th, at 5 : 30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE & - Wednesday, May 23rd, at 5 : 30 p.m. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE JOINT WORKS SELECTION - Wednesday, May 23rd, at 7 : 30 p.m. COMMITTEE (immediately following the Executive Committee meeting) CONSERVATION, - Thursday, May 31st, at 5 : 30 p.m. RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d ORANGE COUNTY,CAIIEORNIA 'p ELL.B.rE V O BOX 0127 I Tux VALLEY.CUO A Bza musu.zan JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings May May 09, 1990 May 23, 1990 June Jun 13, 1990 Jun 27, 1990 July Jul 11, 1990 Jul 2S, 1990 August Aug 08, 1990 None Scheduled September Sep 12, 1990 Sep 26, 1990 October Oct 10, 1990 Oct 24, 1990 November Nov 14, 1990 None Scheduled December Dec 12, 1990 None Scheduled January Jan 09, 1991 Jan 23, 1991 February Feb 13, 1991 Feb 27, 1991 March Mar 13, 1991 Mar 27, 1991 April Apr 10, 1991 Apr 24, 1991 May May 08, 1991 May 29, 1991 K BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation DlsMch P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,Calnomia Fountain volley,CA 9272E-8127 Telephone:(714)962.2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MAY 9, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (4) EACH DISTRICT Annuua el—ection of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tern of the Boards: (a) District 1 (b) District 2 (c) District 3 (d) District 5 (a) District 6 (f) District 7 (g) District 11 (h) District 13 (i) District 14 (5) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (6) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. 5/09/90 ' (7) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for — information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (8) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: IT no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - April 11, 1990 regular District 2 - April 11, 1990 regular, and April 18, 1990 adjourned District 3 - April 11, 1990 regular District 5 - April 11, 1990 regular District 6 - April 11, 1990 regular District 7 - April 11, 1990 regular District 11 - April 11, 1990 regular District 13 - April 11, 1990 regular District 14 - April 11, 1990 regular (9) ALL DISTRICTS Con8lderaf-io-n of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" -and B. 4/11/90 4/25/90 ALL DISTRICTS Jo�ating Fund - $ 564,949.79 $ 946,387.45 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 2,044,463.55 354,973.08 Joint Working Capital Fund - 212,846.74 186,375.58 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 13,922.72 11,743.17 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 338.00 135.72 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 8,090.58 12,771.73 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 18,459.41 3,384.51 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 5,808.77 7,539.74 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 230.71 9,197.99 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 16,126.40 82,380.68 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 4,319.12 6,749.59 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 38.00 -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - 5,406.93 28,456.16 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 6 6 JOINT - 24,599.59 3,058.83 --� DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 2,274.67 11,519.6�'. DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 2,035.92 3,690.44 $2,923,910.90 $1,660,364.28 -2- 5/09/90 (10) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 10(a) THROUGH 10(n) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase order contract for video Inspection Services for Districts' Sewers and Manholes, specification No. 5-045, to PSS, Inc. , in an amount not to exceed $164,786 .00 for a two-year period beginning May 15, 1990. See page "C" (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $21, 371 .00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. for three items of additional work. See page 'D" (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and 8 at Reclamation Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-35-1 , authorizing an addition of $92,392.00 to the contract with S. A. Healy Co. & Assoc. for seven items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for completion of `.,►� said additional work. See page "E" -3- 5/09/90 (10) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of the following actions relative - to Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17: (1 ) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said additional services. See page "F" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-41, approving said Addendum No. 2 to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, for said additional services on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, for an additional amount not to exceed $6,438.00 for wage escalations due to delays in the project, plus construction management/ inspection services at the rate of $80.00 per hour, including overhead and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $156,160.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $329,105.00 to an amount not to exceed $491,703.00. See page "G" (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-42, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for technical and environmental support services relative to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Environmental Impact Report and Ocean Discharge Permit renewal application, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $304,000.00. See page "H" (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order to Southern California Edison Company in the amount of $69,499.00 and execute necessary documents, in form approved by the General Counsel, for installation of added underground facilities to provide for a 4,000 kw, standby electrical power service for Plant No. 1 . (g) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Solar Turbines, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $45,000.00 plus sales tax for Repairs to Solar Energy Generator No. 2 at Plant No. 1 (Specification No. R-036 ) . -4- 5/09/90 (10) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (h) Consideration of motion amending the Boards, action of April 11, 1990, revoking authorization for staff to issue a purchase order to Michael Chevrolet in the amount of $86,535.00 plus tax for the purchase of nine Chevrolet S10 pick-up trucks (Specification No. A-150-2) ; and authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Folsom Lake Ford in the amount of $84,331.89 plus tax and delivery charges for purchase of nine Ford Ranger pick-up trucks (Specification No. A-150-2) , in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program of the State of California and State of California Contract No. 1-90-23-20 (1) Consideration of motion denying Application for Permission to Present Late Claim for personal injuries filed by Leatrice L. Cohen, attorney for claimant Lynn Redman. See page "I" DISTRICT 2 (j ) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, authorizing an addition of $77,778.00 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp. for six items of additional work and granting a time extension of 14 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "J" (k) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order to Southern California Gas Company in an amount not to exceed $70,000.00 and to execute necessary documents, in form approved by the General Counsel, for relocation of approximately 1,400 feet of 4-inch diameter gas main required in connection with construction of the Katella Relief Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-28. DISTRICTS 5 6 6 (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2: [ITEM (10) (1) CONTINUED ON PAGE 61 -5- 5/09/90 ' (10) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (1) (Continued from page 5) : (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $1,305.00 to the contract with National Plant Services, Inc. for additional video inspection services, and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for delay in starting the project to allow the contractor to complete emergency repair work to sewers in San Francisco damaged by the October 1990 earthquake. See page "R" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-50, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page "L" DISTRICT 7 (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-51-7, ordering annexation of 2.47 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Amapola Avenue and Orange Park Boulevard in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 129 - Garrett Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7) See page "M" (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-52-7 , approving Reimbursement Agreement with George Adams, Jr. , providing for reimbursement to Mr. Adams by the District of a proportional share of his cost of constructing a sewer line in Baja Panorama Street, to be collected from the owners of Lots 7 and 9 of Tract No. 939 upon connection to the sewer. See page "N" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ALL DISTRICTS Cons�n of action on items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -6- 5/09/90 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's V written report of the meeting on April 25, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by the Executive Committee: (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-43, establishing policies and procedures for the selection and procurement of professional engineering, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management services. (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to F. E. Carleton in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for professional consulting services, on an as-needed basis, at the rate of $95 .00 per hour, for a two-year period beginning May 10, 1990, to assist the Districts in obtaining permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for current and future projects at both treatment plants, and for assistance relative to other SCAQMD issues. (13 ) DISTRICTS 1,2, 3 ,5,6,7,11 a 13 (a) verbal staff report on Long-range Financial Plan Update and 1990-91 Sewer Connection and Use Fee Recommendations (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated April 25, 1990 re Long-range Financial Plan Update and 1990-91 Sewer Connection and Use Fee Recommendations (Previously mailed to Directors under separate cover) . (14) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 ,7,11 6 13 (a) Public hearing relative to the following proposed Ordinances of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 , 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinances Establishing wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities: See page "O" Amending Repealing District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 1 115 113 114 2 211 208 209 3 313 311 312 5 522 520 521 6 616 614 615 7 724 722 723 11 1112 1110 1111 13 1307 1305 1306 [ITEM ( 14) CONTINUED ON PAGE 8] _7_ 5/09/90 (14) DISTRICTS 1,2, 3,5,6,7,11 6 13 (Continued from page 7) (a) Public hearing: ' ( 1) Open hearing ( 2) verbal Report of General Counsel ( 3 ) Receive and file written comments, if any (4) Oral public comments, if any (5) Staff response to comments (6) Close hearing (b) DISTRICT 1 Cons ration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending ordinance No. 113 Establishing wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 114: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 115 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 115 . (c) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 209: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 211 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting ordinance No. 211. [ITEM (14) CONTINUED ON PAGE 9] -8- 5/09/90 (14) (d) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board `./ of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 312: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 313 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 313. (a) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 520 Establishing wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 521: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 522 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 522. (f) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 615: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 616 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 616. (ITEM (14) CONTINUED ON PAGE 10] V� -9- 5/09/99 (14) (g) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of the following actions relative to -- proposed Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 723 : (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 724 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 724. (h) DISTRICT 11 Considers ion of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1111 : (1 ) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1112 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1112. ( i) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1306 : (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1307 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1307 . -10- 5/09/90 (15) DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 6 13 (a) Public hearing relative to the following proposed Ordinances of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 0£ Orange County, California, Amending Ordinances Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: See page P. Amending Repealing District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 1 116 109 112 3 314 309 N/A 5 523 516 519 6 617 609 611 6 613 11 1113 1108 1109 13 1308 1303 N/A (1) Open hearing (2) verbal Report of General Counsel ( 3) Receive and file written comments, if any (4) Oral public comments, if any (5) Staff response to comments (6) Close hearing (b) DISTRICT 1 Consiceration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 116 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 116. (c) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 314 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 314. (ITEM ( 15) CONTINUED ON PAGE 121 -11- 5/09/0' (15) (d) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519 : (1 ) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 523 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 523. (e) DISTRICT 6 Consi eration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613; (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 617 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 617. (f) DISTRICT 11 Conga ion of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109 : (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1113 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1113 . [ITEM (15) CONTINUED ON PAGE 13] las/ -12- 5/09/90 (15) (g) DISTRICT 13 Cons�ion of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1308 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1308. (16) DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13 Consideration of t e o lowing resolutions directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinances of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 of Orange County, commencing with the 1990-91 fiscal year: See page District Resolution No. Ordinance No. 1 90-44-1 116 3 90-45-3 314 5 90-46-5 523 6 90-47-6 617 11 90-48-11 1113 13 90-49-13 1308 (17) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (18) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -13- 5/09/90' (19 ) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 20) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (21 ) DISTRICT 2 0 E eeriness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 5 Ot— e� u-siness and communications or supplemental agenda Items, if any ( 24) DISTRICT 5 Consiration of motion to adjourn (25 ) DISTRICT 6 Ot er asiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26 ) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 7 Con— s�tion of motion to adjourn (29 ) DISTRICT 13 Other mess and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 30) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 31 ) DISTRICT 14 OtHe-r mess and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 32) DISTRICT 14 Consi eration of motion to adjourn ( 33 ) DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Consideration of the following actions relative to the financing, design, construction, capacity ownership and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities for serving Districts 3 and 11 : (a) verbal staff report -- [ITEM (33 ) CONTINUED ON PAGE 15] -14- 5/09/90 ( 33) DISTRICTS 3 9 11 (Continued from page 14) (b) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve staff Report dated May 1, 1990. See page "R" (c) Consideration of motion to receive, file, approve and adopt the Project Report relative to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, dated April 3, 1990, prepared by John Carollo Engineers (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-53, approving Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 providing for financing, design, construction, capacity ownership and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities for serving Districts 3 and 11. See page .'S" (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff and General Counsel to negotiate with General Telephone and Electronics (GTE) to secure a site adjacent to the existing Slater Avenue Pump Station for construction of the new pump station, providing for the exchange of the existing, smaller site for the new site, upon abandonment of the existing pump station; authorizing the General Manager to execute the necessary documents to effect such exchange, in form approved by the General Counsel; and authorizing payment to GTE in an amount not to exceed $25,000.00 for said exchange. ( 34) DISTRICT 3 O her usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 35) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (36 ) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (37 ) DISTRICT 11 Condon of motion to adjourn -15- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Volley.CA 9 2 72 8-81 2 7 Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date May 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more inportant, non-routine items which appear an the enclosed agenda and which are nat otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material surmmrizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 4: AMML ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND CHAIM�N PRO TEM OF EACH DISTRICr'S BOARD. In accordance with the Districts' rules of procedure (see following excerpt), a Chairman and Chairten pro tem for each District Board is elected annually at the May meeting. Excerpt from Rules of Procedure for Meetings "7. Chaimran of the District - A Cbairmn (and Chairnran pro tem) shall be elected by majority vote as the first order of business by the marl a of each District's Board of Directors at the first meeting in May of each year, and said Chairrrun (and Chhairrran pro tem) shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of said members." For the infornlation of the new Directors, the Districts' regulations provide that each Chai*rnan autorati.cally becomes a Barber of the Executive Cmsrrittee, which ordinarily meets rmnthly at the call of the Joint Chairrrnn- This Committee also includes the Joint CJ>�, Vice Joint Ch=rman and the representatives of the County Board of Supervisors. The Executive Committee's function is to study and nuke reasrmwviations to the Joint Boards concerning major issues and policy matters. -1- May 9, 1990 The current Chairman and Chaim pro tem are as follows: District No. Chairman chairman pro tem 1 Dan Griset Richard Edgar 2 Roland Bigonger James Neal 3 Richard Polis Caney Nelson 5 Evelyn Bart Phil Sansone 6 James Wahner Ruthelyn Plummer 7 Don Smith Richard Edgar 11 Tom Mays Grace Winchell 13 Reny Wedaa Iry Pickler 14 Peer Swan (vacant) Nominations for Joint Chairman are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting. Naninations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman are conducted at the July regular meeting. 10(a) : AWARD PUFJMVSE ORDER CONIRWr FOR AS-NEEDED VIDEO INSPEMON SE[iVICES FOR DISTRICIS TRDNR SEWERS AND MA4UZES, SPECIFICATION NO. S-045. From time to time, the Districts engage contractors to conduct video inspections of sewers and manholes to determine their condition. Often, the inspections are of an urgency or emergency nature. In the past bids have been solicited each time services were required. Staff believes that a long-term contract with a firm specializing in this type of work would reduce total costs and has, therefore, solicited bids for a two-year contract. Three bids were received for video inspection services, ranging from a high of $121,917.00 per year to a low of $79,893.00 per year. The amounts are bassi on a unit cost bid for sewer footage and pipe size plus miscellaneous specified charges, and an estimated annual rwg,;rament to T.V. appradmately 25 miles of sewers. (The Districts presently operate over 800 miles of trunk sewers and 1,000 miles of local sewers.) It is recommended that award be made to P.S.S. Inc., the lowest bidder, for a two-year contract for Video Inspection Services for Districts Trunk Sewers and Manholes, Specification No. S-045. The two-year contract period is estimated to cost a maximum of $164,786.00, based on the projected sewer and manhole inspections plus an allowance of $5,000.00 for miscellanecus charges provided for in the specifications. A bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material. 10(b): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 1O PRIMARY CIARIFIERC NOS. 6-15 AND RFNaTED FACT r= AT RFCIAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33. Job No. P1-33, Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new 60 ngd primary -2- May 9, 1990 treatment facility and a new network of large diameter piping for plant effluent ... discharges at a cost of $39.7 million, the largest single project ever awarded by the Districts. Change Order No. 2 includes three items of work and adds $21,371.00 to the contract. Item 1, for $4,497.00, includes additional telephone service conduit for the office trailers that house the Districts' construction management staff. The service romirsmnnts of the expanded telephone system exceeded the existing telephone concuit's capacity and the additional conduit was not included in the original contract. Item 2 is for modifications to the West Perimeter Road and involved $15,498.00 of extra work. The extra work included an additional light pole, the relocation of the specified security camera and modifications to the concrete island. These modifications were required to increase the field of vision, expand the camera's scanning capabilities and provide safety lighting at the West Perimeter Road Entrance/Exit on Garfield Avenue. Item 3, for $1,376.00, involves the extra costs of potholing an existing Orange County Water District (OCWD) pipeline located on our property. OCWD has requested the ability to maintain flows in their existing pipeline in lieu of abandoning it as shown on the contract plans. The cost included in this item is for verification of pipeline material and location. All costs included in this item and all future items associated with OCWD pipelines will be paid by OCWD. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for an addition of $21,371.00 to the contract with Gist K. Newberg Construction Co. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 10(c): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 EM FMABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 AT FMAMAT'ION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-35-1. Job No. P1-35-1 is for the rehabilitation of two digesters at Plant 1. Rehabilitation includes the installation of high-rate sludge mixing systems to improve digester gas production. Change Order No. 3 adds $92,392.00 to the $2.3 million contract for seven items of additional work and a time extension of 60 calendar days to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $51,479.00, is for relocating and installing a new motor control center (Mx) from the digester pmmp control room to Power Building C, which has a controlled environ re nt. The existing MC is corroded beyond r pin and this work was not included in the original contract. Item 2, in the amount of $8,800.00, is for replacing two existing defective plug valves with ball valves which are compatible with the new, sludge piping system. Item 3, in the amount of $2,990.00, is for the addition of type 316 stainless steel expandable hoops to seal the seven PLC lined mmrvsys to the concrete domes. Item 4, in the amount of $11,040.00, is for the additional costs incurred with the relocation of a 14-inch sludge mixing line which was changed to avoid interference with an existing 8-inch primary sludge feed line. Additional pipe and a higher wall penetration were required to prevent digester gas from being trapped at the high point. -3- May 9, 1990 Item 5, in the amount of $4,073.00, is for the cost of upgrading mixing pump electrical control boxes from a NM U rating to an to explosion rating in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. Item 6, in the amount of $8,635.00, is for the addition of outdoor lighting in a hazardous work area. The lighting will provide a safer work area. Item 7, in the amount of $5,375.00, is to replace existing damaged and missing aluminum grating inside the digester control room which will provide a safer work area. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recmmends approval of Change Order No. 3 adding $92,392.00 and 60 calendar days to the contract with S. A. Healy Co. 10(d): APPRMING SELECrION COM•D:T1EH CER=ICATION AND ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WrM BOYLE ENGGINF.E UM CORPORATION FOR CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17. In December 1989, the Directors awarded a construction contract in the amount of $7,090,000 to J. R. Roberts Corp. for the construction of the new Central laboratory. Construction is now in progress. The plans and specifications for the new lab were prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation order a professional services agreement approved by the Directors in August 1986. The agreement was amended in 1987 when the site for the laboratory was changed. The agreement with Boyle provides for initial project planning, design and construction support. However, the time period between the beginning of Boyle's work and the project has been delayed, and the estimated cmpleti.on of construction is lager than anticipated (now Spring of 1991). Therefore, Boyle has requested a cost increase in the amount of $6,438.00 to account for the wage escalations that have occurred and impacted the services contracted for in 1986. The second item for the addendum relates to the Districts' construction management work load. The Directors are aware that the Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, and Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, (at a combined cost of about $8 million) are behind schedule, and being constructed by the same contractor as the Central Laboratory. The original plans called for the completion of Jobs J-7-4 and J-20 by the time the lab constriction started. In addition, the Districts soon expect to begin on the construction of a new control center, Job No. J-23-1. The work load of these concurrent support facilities projects has strained the Districts' construction management resources. Therefore, staff has requested that Boyle provide additional construction support services for the Central laboratory. Specifically, staff has requested a full-time Boyle employee on site for the next year to menage the Central laboratory construction project. On April 11, 1990, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 with Boyle Engineering Corporation. Accordingly, the � Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation providing for the additional work described above. -4- May 9, 1990 Proposed Proposed E—sting Addendum Amended Aareanent No. 2 Agre®ent Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 155.5 8), not to exceed $270,960 $ 6,438 $277,418 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 5,000 -0- 5,000 Sntmnn,ltant Fees, not to exceed 12,750 -0- 12,750 Fixed Profit 40,395 -0- 40,395 $329,105 $ 6,438 $335,543 Construction Management/ Inspection Personnel, (hourly rate including labor, overhead and profit), at $80.00/hr. 156 16 $156,160 $329,105 $162,598 $491,703 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting documents. 10(e): APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM INC. . RE ENVIROIrMa= AND TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR COLLE ON, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACrr. TIES MASTER PLAN, ENVIRCIMTPAL IMPACT REPORT AND OCEAN DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION. In October 1987 the Directors approved a professional services agreement with K. P. Lindstrom Inc. to provide technical and environmental services support for preparation of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, the Program Environmental Inpact Report on the Master plan, and the Ocean Discharge Permit Application, collectively referred to as the "2020 VISION" Wastewater Managcnwnt Action Plan. K. P. Lindstrom has also been assisting staff with sludge management, water conservation, reclamation, legislation, ocean monitoring and regulatory agency liaison activities. The consultant has continued to support staff in the implementation of the Master Plan, EIR and the application permitting process for renewal of our 301(h) NPDFS Ocean Discharge Permit. It appears that it will be some time before the EPA completes the review process. We expect that additional information and clarifications of submitted data will be requested during the -5- May 9, 1990 review period and the consultant's assistance will be required. This ongoing effort will require more ccord nation meetings and support activities than originally anticipated, requiring higher travel expense. Accordingly, the Consultant has requested a reallocation of expense categories with no change in the total authorized contract amount. The recommended contract category changes are as follows: Proposed Existing Proposed Amended Asrea:ent Addn. No. 1 Acree:ent Professional services, at hourly rates for labor, not to exceed $ 280,000 $(7,000) $ 273,000 Direct expenses, at cost 24,000 7,000 31,000 $ 304,000 $ -0- $ 304,000 There is no change in the total contract amount as the work will be accomplished within the $304,000.00 budget. 10(f) : APPROVE PURCHASE ORDER TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) FOR STANDBY ELEC mTCAL POWER SERVICE AT PLANT NO. 1. The critical nature of the Districts' operations requires a highly reliable electrical power supply. A lengthy plant shutdown created by a power outage could be catastrophic and, obviously, is an unacceptable situation. The staff has analyzed the existing electrical service and believes that the reliability and flexibility can be greatly improved by the addition of a standby electrical service. Staff presented the problem to Southern California Edison (SCE) and solicited a recommendation. SCE recommended that a second, underground standby service be installed which would preclude a possible outage created by an automobile running into a power pole. Staff concurred and requested that SCE prepare doc:ments necessary for installation of the standby power source to enhance the Districts' electrical power reliability. Plant No. 1 will have two separate electric power services- above-ground active and one underground standby, thereby enhancing the power supply with a higher degree of reliability and flexibility. Staff recom:ends authorization for the General Manager to execute the SCE application and contract and to issue a purchase order to SCE in the amount of $69,499.00 for the installation of the 4,000 KW standby underground electric power service for Plant No. 1. The contract has been approved by the General Counsel. 10(g): AVTHCRIZING REPAIRS TO SOLAR EMEFJMWY GENERATOR NO. 3 AT PLANT' NO. 1, SPECIFICATION NO. R-036. The Districts have Solar gas turbines that provide 800 KW each of emergency electrical power to the secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 1. -6- May 9, 1990 In February 1990, while routinely exercising Unit No. 3, staff observed the unit making an unexplained noise. The unit was imeHately shut down for inspection. The inspection revealed that a foreign object (we suspect a rivet) had care loose and broken a turbine blade off the first stage of the compressor. At the time of this incident the turbine was rotating in excess of 22,000 rpm. The unit was taken out of service and shipped to Solar's facilities in Texas for a complete inspection. Our mechanical division supervisor observed the inspection and it has been determined that the broken blade made its way through the compressor, the combustor and the first two stages of the turbine itself. Along the way it damaged the complete compressor rotor assembly and the first two stages of the turbine. Solar Turbines, Inc., the manufacturer of the gas turbine, has agreed to repair the unit for an amount not to exceed $45,000.00, plus applicable sales tax. This price has been negotiated down from Solar's original estimate of $95,400.00. The cost of a new unit is $119,000.00, plus sales tax. The best price that we have been able to obtain to rent a similar unit is $72,000.00 per yam- Staff recommends that a purchase order be issued to Solar Turbines, Inc., be authorized in an amount not to exceed $45,000.00, plus sales tax, for the repair and installation of the unit. 10(h): AMENDING BOARD P=ON OF APRILL 11, 1190 AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF NINE PICKUP TRUCKS, SPECIFICATION No. A-150-2, FROM FOISOM LAKE FORD. At the Board meeting of April 11, 1990, authorization was given for Districts' staff to award purchase order contracts for five sedans and nine pickup trucks. The awards were based on participation in the Cooperative Procurement Program provided by the State of California for procurement of the vehicles from dealers in our geographical area. The five sedans were Ford Tempos to be purchased from Reuter Ford in Glendale; and the nine pickup trucks were for the Chevrolet Model S10, to be purchased from Michael Chevrolet in Fresno. As part of our SCIQMID Regulation XV compliance program, the Districts are investigating the conversion of selected vehicles from gasoline powered to liquid propane, electric, and/or any other power source that will assist in clean air goals. The above purchases were therefore made subject to the confi nntion that the vehicles could be converted to "clean burn" fuel. From our investigations, it has been determined that vehicles manufactured by General Motors can not comply with the California required emission test when the power source is converted to liquid propane gas (LPG) , whereas vehicles manufactured by Ford can comply. The State of California Procurement Policy is for public agencies to purchase their vehicles from the dealer(s) selected in their geographic area. There are no Ford dealers that supply comparable pickup trucks under the State's program in the Southern California area. However, in the Sacramento area the State's award was made to Folsom Lake Ford for Ford Ranger pickup trucks, which are comparable to the Chevrolet S10. Due to our special requirement, the State Procurement Office has approved the Ford purchase from the Sacramento area. The cost for the nine Ford pickups from Folsom Take Ford, including delivery charges from Sacramento, is estimated to cost approximately $1,076.00 less than authorized by the Hoards in April for purchase of the Chevrolet models from Michael Chevrolet in Fresno. -7- May 9, 1990 It is therefore recamended that the original Board action on April llth authorizing purchase of nine Chevrolet Model S10 pickup trucks be amended to revoke the purchase from Michael Chevrolet of Ios Angeles, and that Districts' staff be authorized instead to issue a purchase order through the State of California Procurement Program, to Folsom Lake Ford for nine Ford Banger pickup trucks (Specification No. A-150-2), for an amount of $84,331.89 plus sales tax and delivery charges. 10(i): DENY APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM--RE LYNN REDHAN. The Districts have received an Application for Percussion to Present late Claim pursuant to Government Code Section 911.4 by the attorney representing employee Lynn Reitman. The claim asserts that Mr. Redman has incurred personal injuries because of his exposure to sewage treatment plant operations. Attached to the agenda material is a memorandum from the General Counsel recamending that the request be denied. DISTRICT 2 10(j): APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PORTION OF THE EUCLID nUERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT' NO. 2-26-2, AND SOUTH ANAHEIM RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-27. This project is the installation of vitrified clay and reinforced concrete gravity sewer relief lines. Contract No. 2-26-2, Portion of the Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Iampson Avenue, and Contract No. 2-27, the South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, in the total amount of $9.7 mullion, are located within the Cities of Garden Grove, Santa Ana, Fountain Valley and Anaheim. Change Order No. 6, in the amount of $77,778.00 adds six items of work and 14 calendar days to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $4,760.00, is for additional water line valves requested by the City of Garden Grove. This is a reimbursable item from Garden Grove. Item 2, in the amount of $6,870.00, is for a temporary connection and permanent relocation of an 8-inch water line shown incorrectly on the plans. In December the staff reported to the Directors that the City of Garden Grove had awarded a contract within Nelson Street for the construction of new water mains, stone drain facilities and street improve ants. The District's project and the City's improvements were coordinated prior to contract award; however, the City has been unable to proceed as planned and certain changes were therefore required to the District's project so that the sewer work could proceed. The District's original construction documents provided that the Euclid Interceptor would be constructed in the easterly side of Nelson Street within right-of-way to be acquired by the City of Garden Grove. The City was unable to acquire the right-of-way as scheduled and, thus, while under construction, it was necessary for the sewer alignment to be changed by the District to stay within existing right-of-Dray. Staff also reported in December that there would be additional costs associated with the work within Nelson Street for protection of utilities, including power, water, sewer and gas lines which were to have been relocated by the City, or were affected by the need to change the sewer alignment; and that several change orders would be presented to -8- May 9, 1990 the Board to cover the contractor's costs associated with these changes. Item 3, in the amount of $33,004.00, is for the protection and relocation of several utilities on Nelson Street, between Stanford Avenue and Iampson Avenue, which were to be moved prior to construction by the City of Garden Grove. (Previous Change Order No. 3, Item 2, paid for extra utility work on Nelson Street between Pearl Street and Stanford Avenue for the same reason. ) Item 4, in the amount of $1,760.00, is for delays caused by the City of Orden Grove when a water line could not be isolated. Item 51 in the amount of $1,340.00, is for additional project signs for added safety precautions for the motoring public. Item 6, in the amount of $30,044.00, is for the protection and repair of several undisclosed utilities. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 adding $77,778.00 and a time extension of 14 calendar days to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corporation. 10(k): APPROVE AGEUM4Wr AND 1URQJASE ORDER WITH SWfH M CAI.TP0FU IA GAS CCMPANY FOR RELOCATION OF GAS MAIN RE CONSTRUCTION OF KATELIA RELIEF SEWER, CONnWr NO. 2-28. In June, the Directors will be considering the approval of the plans and specifications for a portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenues, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer between Euclid and Walnut Streets, Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29. The final design for these projects was based on information provided by the cities of Anaheim and Fullerton as well as input furnished by public and private utilities, including the Southern California Gas Company, on the location of their existing facilities. A key element at all three project locations in establishing the alignment of the sewer system was the ability to provide adequate traffic detours along the major streets for the safety and protection of the traveling public. All interested parties, including the District, have agreed that the best overall alignment along Katella Avenue (Contract No. 2-28) to accomplish this goal requires the relocation of about 1,400 feet of 4-inch steel gas main and service connections to allow the construction of the new 27-inch vitrified clay pipe sewer. The Southern California Gas Company has estimated the cost of the mein relocation to be about $70,000.00 (final payment will be based on actual costs) . The recommended action is to authorize the General Manager execute a Collectible Work Authorization and Indemnification Agreement and to issue a purchase order to Southern California Gas Company in an amount not to exceed $70,000.00 for the necessary relocation work. The agreement has been approved by General Counsel. DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 10(1): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 7O FUMBII.ImnTTON OF BALBOA TRUNK SEWER. CGNTTWT NO. 5-27-1, AND INVESTIGATION OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, CL4SINM.T NO. 5-37-2, AND ACCEPMNCE OF JOB AS CU41I=. This project consists of two contracts. The first contract is the rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, between 32nd Street and Coronado Street in Newport Boulevard and Balboa Boulevard in Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-27-1, -9- May 9, 1990 which includes the pressure testing and chemical grouting of sewer pipeline joints. The second contract is the inspection of a portion of the Pacific Coast �..i Highway Seer between Bitter Point Pump Station and Dover Drive in Newport Beach, which includes cleaning the sewer and bypassing as necessary to videotape the inside of the pipe, to assess the condition of the sewer with regard to location of leaks and cracks. The data from this inspection will be used to determine the need and type of repairs to be accomplished in a future contract. (1) Chance Order No. 1 Item 1 is a 60-day time extension. At the time of award of the contract, the Contractor had mobilized all of his available labor and equipment to help repair sewers in San Francisco which were damaged by the large earthquake. It was determined in the best interests of all concerned and the public in general to delay the start of our construction contract until the Contractor could finish the emergency work in San Francisco. Item 2, in the amount of $1,305.00, is for the video inspection of an additional 660 linear feet of the Pacific Coast Highway Sewer not included in the original contract. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $1,305.00 and a time extension of 60 calendar days to the contract with National Plant Services, Inc. (2) Closeout Agreement National Plant Services, Inc. has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and authorized extensions of time. Staff therefore recartmends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Co pleticn as required. The final project cost is $109,626.40. DISTRICD 7 10(m): ORDERING ANNEXATION 129—GAMUM ANNEXATION 7b COUNTY SANITAPSON DISTRICT NO. 7. This 2.47-acre annexation is for one single family residence (under construction) in the vicinity of Amapola Avenue and Orange Park Boulevard in unincorporated county territory within Orange Park Acres. The local seaering agency is District 7. The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AS 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties. es. Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda material ordering Annexation No. 129. -10- May 9, 1990 10(n) : APPROVE RED4BURSEGffi7T AJMU MRV FOR SEWER LINE CONSPRUMON IN BA7A PANORAMA WITH GEORGE ADAGE, JR. Mr. George Adams, Jr. is building a house on Lot 8 of Tract 939. In order to provide sewer service to this parcel he has constructed a Public sewer along Baja Panorama Street which will have the capacity to serve six lots, including his own. The owners of Iots 10, 11 and 12 have already paid their fair share of the cost of construction directly to Mr. Adams. The agreement provides that CSD 7 will collect a fair share of the construction cost ($8,257 per lot) from the remaining lot owners (7 and 9) when and if the lots develop, and reimburse the owner if the cc nection is made within five years (less a five percent administrative charge) . If the connection is made after five years, the District retains the full amount collected. Staff recommends approval of the agreement. ALL DISTRICTS 12: REPORT AND RECODMMMONS OF E:®CUrIVE CCM II= GD; 11C. The Executive Committee net on April 25, 1990. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recamendations. 13, 14, 15 AND 16: PUBLIC HEARMG AND CC SIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF 1990-91 SEWER CCNNE TION AND USER FMS4. The Boards' adopted Financial Plan provides for financing sewerage facilities expansion (capacity increases) with sewer connection fees paid by new development; facilities rehabilitation and improved treatment by borrowing capital funds in the securities market; and operations, mainntenanne and new debt service by a combination of property taxes and use fees. Each year, as part of the budget process, staff updates the Financial Plan fiscal projections and recommends connection and user fee rates required to finance Districts' activities for the ensuing year. At the April llth Joint Board meeting, preliminary staff reports were presented to the Boards and ordinances were introduced to fix the above sewer connection and user fees for 1990-91. First reading of the respective ordinances was held and passed to second reading and a public hearing at the regular Joint Board meeting on May 9th. On April 27th, a complete and final staff report updating the financial projections and setting forth recommended sewer connection and user fee rates for 1990-91 was mailed under separate cover to the Directors. The report rercu.uends the following rates: e SEWER CONNECTION FEE Dwelling Unit $2,280 Camercial/Industrial/ $460/1,000 sq. ft. Institutional Property -11- May 9, 1990 ° USER FEES Single Fam. Multi-Fam. Commercial/Indust. District Residential Residential Govermnental/Other 1 $55.00 $33.00/Unit $39.00/1000 sq.ft. 3 50.00 30.00/Unit 36.00/1000 sq.ft. 5 55.00 33.00/Unit 39.00/1000 sq.ft. 6 55.00 33.00/Unit 39.00/1000 sq.ft. 11 50.00 30.00/Unit 36.00/1000 sq.ft. 13 95.00 57.00/Unit 68.00/1000 sq.ft. The actions appearing on the agenda are to hold the second reading and public hearing on the proposed ordinances fixing seiner connection and user fees for 1990-91, consideration of adoption of said ordinances; and adoption of resolutions authorizing and directing the County Auditor-Controller to collect the user fees on the annual properly tax bill. 17: AMM FOR CIOSED SESSION. Promo time to tdae it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exeapt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICTS 3 AND 11 33: CONSIDERATION OF ACTIONS RE FINANCING, DESIGN, CO]STRUCTICN, CAPACITY ONNERSBIP AND OPERATION OF CERTAIN MPSTER-PIANNED SEWAGE COLLECTION FACILITIES FOR SERVING DISTRICTS 3 AND 11. Master-Planned Sewer Facilities Over the past several years, the Directors have authorized staff and consultants to engage in various activities dealing with the long-term sewage collection needs of the northwesterly portion of County Sanitation District 11 (CSD 11) and a small portion of County Sanitation District 3 (CSD 3) which drains to CSD 11's Slater Avenue Pulp Station. The completed studies include a 1988 report prepared by Willdan Associates which dealt with the possible exchange of drainage areas between CSD 3 and CSD 11; the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan (30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, 112020 VISION'), and a recently completed Project Report on the Slater Avenue Punp Station Sewage System Inprovements, Contract No. 11-17. In general, the studies analyzed the needed sewage facilities for CSD 3 and CSD 11 and prioritized their need, concluded that the long planned extension of the Coast Trunk Suer should be replaced with the reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station by both CSD 3 and CSD 11 (this change is projected to save CSD 3 $600,000 and ORD 11 $4,700,000) and that construction costs be shared in accordance with sewage flows generated from) each District. -12- May 9, 1990 Enclosed with the supporting agenda material is a copy of a Project Report on Slater Avenue Pimp Station Sewage System Improvarents prepared by John Carollo Engineers, and a Staff Report which smmerizes the Project Report in some detail. The most urgent eleffent of the Project Report is the reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station including the influent and discharge facilities. Those facilities, the Slater Avenue Pmmp Station Influent Relief Sewer, the Slater Avenue force Main, Gravity Sewer and Diversion Structure and the Slater Avenue Pump Station, will cost $7,600,000. The second priority is the replacement of the Goldemest Trunk Sewer, south of Heil Avenue between Slater Avenue and Heil Avenue, at a cost of $4,300,000. Additional facilities include the parallel Slater Avenue Trunk, the Heil Avenue interceptor, iuprovernts in Warner Avenue west of Springdale Street, and new lines in Springdale and Goldernest Streets north of McFadden Avenue and Edinger Avenue respectively. The Staff Report also comments on capacity exchanges in existing and proposed sewage facilities. CSD 3 discharges to existing CSD 11 facilities, including the Slater Avenue Pump Station sewerage system and the existing Coast Trunk System. The proposed capacity exchange in the respective trunk sewer facilities by each District would result in a net equity purchase in the amamt of $630,836.00 by CSD 3 from CSD 11. Financino The Project Report estimated the total cost for the Slater Avenue Puap Station, influent sewers, and discharge facilities at slightly under $18 million. of this total-, CSD 3 wound pay $1,050,000 and CSD 11 would pay $16,950,000. (In addition, both Districts have other facilities to construct identified in the 1989 Master Plan.) As previously discussed, CSD 3 would also pay CSD 11 $630,836 for capacity equity in CSD 11's existing facilities. The priority items, the Slater Avenue Punp Station including the influent and discharge facilities previously described, will cost $7,600,000, with CSD 11 paying $6,550,000 and CSD 3 paying $1,050,000. The priority work and other long-term capital construction costs, however, will require the infusion of additional funds. For CSD 11, the issuance of debt or prepayment of annexation and connection fees will be necessary prior to construction of the facilities. The development of Holes China (see discussion below) and other vacant areas within the northwesterly portion of CSD 11 including the Meadowlark Airport, the Mcdonnell Douglas site, sma11 lot in-]wilding, etc. will provide fee revenue, if collected on a timely basis, to provide the necessary capital. For CSD 3, the development of the Holly-Sea cliff properties (partially within both CSD 3 and CSD 11), will more than offset the funding necessary for the prorated cost sharing of the Slater Avenue Punp Station Sewage System Lmgrove ants. Bolsa China Annexation to CSD 11 In April 1987, the Directors of CSD 11 authorized staff and General Counsel to meet and negotiate with the owners of a proxi, ately 1608 acres, led by the principal landowner, Signal Bolsa Corporation, for annexation of the -13- May 9, 1990 Bohm Chica to CSD 11. The Bolsa Chica area is presently outside the boundary of CSD 11, but within its sphere of influence. The major landowner has had �... ongoing negotiations with the County of Orange, the City of Huntington Beach and the District pertaining to development issues, .including the timely construction of sewer service facilities. The proposed Slater Avenue pump Station is pertly master-planned to serve the Bolsa Chita area. While the total annexation is 1608 acres, only about 340 acres are proposed for development, of which 312 are vaned by Signal Boles. The rest will remain wetlands, or is owned by others. Signal Bolsa principals and counsel and District staff and Counsel have met numerous times over the past several years in an attempt to hammer out a preannexation areement. The last agreement draft submitted by CSD 11 provides for the annexation of the Bolas Chica area and payment of fees for those areas to be developed by Signal Bolsa. Other areas will receive deferred annexation, i.e., if and when they develop, annexation charges would be at the then-prevailing rate, but a separate annexation would not be necessary. Signal Bolsa Corporation is not yet ready to annex, however, they had previously agreed to enter into the agreement to be assured of eventual sewer service and to provide needed funding for the necessary design services. Accordingly, the draft preannexation agreement provides for payment of $250,000.00 30 days after approval, $500,000.00 or more 90 days after approval, and $500,000.00 or more 180 days after approval, and the balance within one year of the execution of the agreement. Each time a payment is made, an equivalent acreage world be considered to be annexed by dividing the payment amount by the then-current annexation acreage charge. After almost five years of negotiations and early commitments by Signal Bolsa, they have just recently advised the staff that they are no longer willing to proceed with the proposed preamnexation agreement. Discussions are ongoing and staff will update the District 11 Directors at the Board meeting. Reco m andations The enclosed Staff Report concludes with the recommended actions appearing on the agenda for financing, design, construction, caps city ownership and operation of certain nester-planned sewage collection facilities for serving Districts 3 and 11. �r -14- RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 12(a) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA April 25, 1990 10044 ELLIS AVENUE PO BOX 0127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 (7141962.2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: April 25, 1990 - 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Director James Neal Director Arthur Newton Buck Catlin Joint Chairman Director Phil Sansone William Mahoney Vice Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Beth Jines, DOHS Richard B. Edgar Past Joint Chairman Mark Leary, DOHS Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman Ted Rauh, DOHS Dan Griset Chairman, District 1 David Jones, EPA Roland Bigonger Chairman, District 2 P. Ravi Shanker, SAWPA Richard Polis Chairman, District 3 Evelyn Hart Chairman, District 5 James Wahner Chairman, District 6 STAFF PRESENT: Don E. Smith Chairman, District 7/Past JC Tom Mays Chairman, District it J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 13 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Don Roth County Supervisor Gary Streed, Director of Finance Roger Stanton County Supervisor Ed Hodges, Sr. Facilities Manager, Maintenance Absent: Rich von Langan, Source Control Mgr. Peer Swan Chairman, District 14 1) Status Report on Long-Term Plan for Stringfellow Clean-up. .In 1985, after considerable discussion and debate, the Boards authorized the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) to issue temporary permits for discharge of treated groundwater from the Stringfellow site to the Sanitation Districts' sewerage system, pending completion of a study and determination on the long-term solution to the Stringfellow clean-up problem. The California Department of Health Services (DOHS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have periodically updated the Directors on the Stringfellow Program. Because the study and report process and a determination on a long-term solution are nearing completion, DOHS and EPA were asked to brief the Committee on the status of the Stringfellow site remediation project. Enclosed is a copy of the Districts' letter requesting the briefing and a copy of a report summarizing staff's understanding of the status of the Stringfellow clean-up project. v Ted Rauh, Beth Jines and Mark Leary, representing the DOHS, and Dave Jones,. representing the EPA, attended the meeting and briefed the Committee on the status of the Stringfellow Project, following which the members posed several questions to DOHS and EPA and offered comments and their views on the clean-up . program and the long-term remedial alternatives. (1 of 4) Executive Committee Report April 25, 1990 At the conclusion of the discussion the Chairman thanked the DOHS and EPA representatives for the update and advised them that the Districts wish to be kept fully informed and consulted as the process proceeds; that the Districts have a legitimate concern about any proposals to turn the project over to the principal responsible parties (PRP's - firms that disposed of the original wastes at the site) and wish to be included in that process as well ; and that it should not be assumed that the Stringfellow treated groundwater can be discharged indefinitely into the Districts' sewerage system. 2) Proposed Revisions to Policies and Procedures for Selection of Professional Architectural and Engineering Services, Since 1976 the Boards have had separate policies and procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services which are reviewed periodically and updated by the Directors. The General Counsel has recently completed a review of new legislation on this subject, together with the current policy and procedure of the Districts, and has recommended some minor revisions and modifications which he reviewed with the Committee members at the March meeting. Following the Committee's review, the proposed new policy resolution was referred back to Counsel and staff to incorporate revisions suggested by Committee members. The General Counsel reviewed the enclosed, revised draft resolution Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Selection and Procurement of . Professional Engineering, Architectural , Environmental , Land Surveying and Construction Management Services, which incorporates the Committee's suggestions in Section 4:B.3.b., on Pages 4 and 5; and Section 8, on Pages 9 and 10. During the discussion that followed the provisions of Section 8 regarding Conflicts of Interest and its relation to other statutory requirements affecting Directors and staff were clarified. Recommendation: The Executive Committee recommends adoption of the revised proposed resolution Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Selection and . Procurement of Professional Engineering, Architectural , Environmental , Land Surveying and Construction Management Services. 3) Status Report on Industrial Waste Ordinance Enforcement Action Litigation. The General Counsel reviewed his enclosed memoranda on the status of the separate legal proceedings filed by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson and Universal Circuits, Inc. , over industrial waste enforcement actions taken by the Districts. With regard to Universal Circuits, Mr. Woodruff,added that the decision from the trial judge in the matter of Universal Circuits, Inc. v. Count Sanitation District Na. 1, had still not been received as of the OUP date. The decision was anticipated to be handed down by the court within the next two (2 of 4) Executive Committee Report April 25, 1990 days. The General Counsel also reported that the matter of litigation, wherein the District has filed suit against Universal Circuits seeking to recover civil administrative penalties, is proceeding in accordance with the regular Court schedule, and no trial date has been set. These Court proceedings both relate to Universal 's existing operation on Newport Circle Drive in Santa Ana. Mr. Woodruff further reported that representatives of Universal Circuits were present and available tonight to address the Board relative to setting a date at which the Executive Committee would hear the matter of the application for a new industrial waste discharge permit for the Company's new facility located at 2249 South Yale Street, Santa Ana, California. Mr. Woodruff reported that the application had been filed some time ago and that the technical information, including plans and specifications for the pretreatment system, had been deficient, and the application was not deemed complete until receipt of the information on Monday, April 23, 1990. In response to a question from a Director, Mr. Woodruff reported that the staff had completed the review of the technical aspects of the pretreatment system and determined it complete, but a full determination and staff report had not been able to be prepared prior to this meeting. Mr. Woodruff noted that if the General Manager reconnended Issuing a permit, it would be subject to a condition that that decision be affirmed by approval of the Executive Committee; and if the General Manager denied the permit, any appeal by Universal Circuits would also be heard by the Executive Committee. Mr. Woodruff related that Universal wished to address the Board to request the matter be expedited so that it would facilitate an early opening of the new plant. A motion was duly made and seconded that in the absence of having a complete and full staff report at this time, no consideration for expediting the hearing process be afforded to the permit applicant. The motion wasunanimously approved with directions that the matter be presented to the Executive Committee in accordance with the established District procedures set forth in the adopted Ordinance and Guidelines. 4) A reement far Professional ConsultingServices with F. E. Carleton re SCA MD Issues. Pursuant to the 1989 adoption of the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) , new regulations, and revisions to existing regulations and rules and permit conditions, are being proposed and implemented by SCAQMD. As the Directors know, Districts' staff and consultants spend a considerable amount of time addressing these issues. In the early 1980's, SCAQMD permits to construct (PTC) required that the Districts install best available control technology (BACT). Subsequently; in addition to BACT, the Districts have had to provide emission offsets in accordance with Regulation XIII, New Source Review, which is currently in the process of being modified and which will further impact our ability to obtain SCAQMD permits. More recently T-BACT (best available control technology for toxics) has been added. About the same time, additional requirements dealing (3 of 4) . i J Executive Committee Report April 25, 1990 with health risk assessments were added. The latest addition to the requirements to obtain a permit is the requirement of conformity, which means that the cities served by the treatment plant project must be in conformity with the AQMP. From time to time the Districts have engaged the professional consulting services of F. E. Carleton to assist in the permitting of various treatment plant projects. Those projects have included the central generation facilities at both plants and the treatment plant expansion at the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant, both now under construction. Staff has also issued separate purchase orders to Carleton for smaller projects within staff authority. Carleton specializes in SCAQMD issues and is located in Pasadena near SCAQMD headquarters, and has been very helpful in dealing with the SCAQMD, Districts' consultants and Districts' staff, by providing guidance and services necessary to obtain the PTCs. Staff believes that those services will be needed on current and planned Districts' projects, including the secondary expansion projects at both treatment plants, now under design, and future primary expansion tentatively planned for the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. Carleton is of considerable assistance in obtaining PTCs as well as assisting with comments on proposed rules and regulations and their effect upon the Districts, Including the New Source Review discussed above. Staff has therefore recommended that rather than issuing individual purchase orders specific to projects, that the Boards consider authorizing a blanket 'purchase order in the amount of $50,000 for Carleton's professional services on an as-needed basis. Mr. Carleton bills at the rate of $95.00 per hour including expenses. Recommendation: The Executive Committee recommends that staff be authorized to issue a purchase order to F. E. Carleton in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for professional consulting services, on an as-needed basis, at the rate of $95.00 per hour, to assist the Districts in obtaining permits from the SCAQMD for current and future projects at both treatment plants, and for assistance relative to other SCAQMD issues. JWS:sc Attc.. (4 of 4) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX$127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 3 108"ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 April 18, 1990 REF #090517.LTR Department of Health Services 714/744 P Street P.O. Box 942732 Sacramento, CA 94234-7320 Attention: Mr. Ted Rauh, Chief Program and Administrative Support Section, Toxic Substances Control Division Subject: Stringfellow Site Status Report This letter is to confirm that the California Department of Health Services (DHS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are tentatively scheduled to brief the Districts' Executive Committee on the status of the Stringfellow Site Remediation project. The meeting will start with a light dinner at 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, April 25, 1990 at the Districts' offices. As we understand it, the final plan for remediation of the site includes the Districts' potential role in the continued disposal of treated wastewater or brine. As you know, the Directors and some members of the public are very interested in the potential impacts of the Stringfellow treated groundwater on the Districts' facilities, water reclamation projects, beneficial use of sludge, and our coastal ocean waters. Therefore, as part of your presentation, we would like you to discuss the quantity and quality of the wastewater, the length of time that the Districts are envisioned to be involved, and the proposed plan and time schedule for the overall clean-up of the site and the contaminated groundwater in the surrounding area. Currently the Districts and Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority have allowed the Stringfellow permit to be assigned to the EPA. With the EPA and the DHS wanting the principle responsible parties to take full financial and possibly operational responsibility for all Superfund Sites, the Districts are interested in any proposed changes that you may be contemplating to the assignment of the permit at the time of renewal as we have concerns over the issue of assigning operational responsibilities. 1 In summary we would like your briefing of the Executive Committee to include the following four areas: 1. Describe the process undertaken by DHS to evaluate the various alternative technologies proposed for the Stringfellow site. Economics, implementability, and environmental impacts should be briefly covered. As part of the discussion on economics, please provide the following information: a) The mass of the material that was originally in the landfill site. b) The mass that has been removed. c) For the selected alternative, the unit cost for removing the remaining material . 2. Describe the proposed long-term remediation alternatives, and the Districts' potential role in accepting the treated groundwater, including the quality, quantity, and length of the time that the remediation might take. Describe the long-term quality assurance provisions that are contemplated to guarantee consistent compliance with the discharge requirements for the treated groundwater. 3. Describe the impacts any Stringfellow Site discharge of treated groundwater to the Districts' system would have on the operation of the Districts' collection and treatment system, the beneficial reclamation of water and reuse of sludge, and the effect on the ocean environment. 4. Describe who will operate the treatment plant, how its long-term operation will be financed, and who the proposed permittee is, including any contemplated requests that the Districts consider the assignment of the permit to another party. We look forward to your presentation on April 25th. Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. fanager a ter G era JWS:RVL:lab REF 5090517.LTR 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS w ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 1B EWSAVENUE PO.BOX 9127 April 19, 1990 MUWJUN VA .ceuwBwA 92J2 127 01X19824a11 STAFF REPORT STRINGFELLOW LONG-TERM REMEDIAL PLAN The purpose of this report is to update the Directors on the status of the Stringfellow site, provide an overview of the California Department of Health Services (DOHS) draft report entitled "Stringfellow Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study: Development and Initial Screening of Alternatives", and report on recent actions to mitigate contamination of groundwater at the site. STRINGFELLOW BACKGROUND The Stringfellow hazardous waste site was operated as a hazardous waste disposal facility from 1956 to 1972. It is located in the middle of a narrow box canyon one-half mile north of Highway 60 in Riverside County near Glen Avon (see Attachment 1). Approximately 34 million gallons of liquid industrial waste from Los Angeles, Orange, and other surrounding counties were deposited at the site. Included in this amount were spent acids, caustics, solvents, pesticides, cyanides, and metal compounds. The site was eventually closed when it became apparent that liquid waste was percolating from the waste pits into the groundwater and that a plume of contaminated groundwater was migrating down-canyon toward the community of Glen Avon and into the Chino Basin, endangering the underground fresh water basin. Mitigation measures began in 1980 with the draining and minor excavation of the open disposal pits and covering them with a clay cap. Also included were concrete diversion channels that intercept surface flows and divert them away from the site. INTERIM REMEDIAL PLAN The Sanitation Districts became involved in the project when the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) approached us for authorization to permit contaminated groundwater extracted from the Stringfellow site to be discharged to the Districts' sewerage system after pretreatment to Districts' standards. Conditional permission was granted in late 1984 by the Boards of Directors - after having considered the suitability of the project for discharge to the Districts' sewer system. 1 In December 1985, the interim remedial plan was executed and discharge �..� commenced from the Stringfellow treatment plant constructed by the DOHS and operated by EPA. Daily analysis of the treated groundwater has shown that the discharge is consistently in full compliance with the stringent limitations of the discharge permit issued by SAWPA as authorized by the Districts. The plant is currently operating at approximately 35,000 to 45,000 gallons per day. The interim permit allows up to 187,000 gallons per day. The Districts authorized SAWPA to extend the permit to December 1990 with the anticipation that a Record of Decision (ROD) by EPA, specifying the selected long-term alternative for remediation and delineating the Districts' proposed involvement in the clean-up program would be finalized by then. The ROD is now expected in May or June, 1990. DOHS REPORT - STRINGFELLOW DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT In June 1988, the DOHS issued a report entitled "Stringfellow Draft Feasibility Study Report" (FS). The purpose of the DOHS report was to formulate broad, alternative long-term remedial actions to prevent or minimize the migration of contaminated groundwater from the Stringfellow site, and to prevent or minimize the impact of contaminants which have already migrated from the site. The report screens the alternative remedial actions for protection of human health and the environment; compliance with applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements of State and federal laws; long-term effectiveness and permanence; reduction of toxicity, mobility, or volume; short-term effectiveness; implementability; cost; State acceptance; and community acceptance. The report was termed a "working document" and was used for discussion at community meetings involving the DOHS, EPA, and the public. The staff provided the Directors with a summary of the report in September, 1988. LONG-TERM REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES The long-term solution to the cleanup of the Stringfellow site will address four zones of contamination: Zone 1: On-Site/Upper Mid-Canyon Area The on-site/upper mid-canyon zone includes the original disposal area consisting of approximately 17 acres in the northern area of Pyrite Canyon southward to about 600 feet south of the subsurface barrier wall . On-site groundwater is heavily contaminated with a large number of organic and inorganic contaminants including heavy metals. Zone 1 has no residential or commercial population. Contaminated groundwater from this zone is designated as Stream A. 2 Zone 2: Mid-Canyon Area The mid-canyon zone encompasses the portion of Pyrite Canyon that extends from the southern edge of Zone 1 southward to the existing set of mid-canyon extraction wells. This zone contains a moderately to heavily contaminated groundwater plume but no identified site-related soil contamination. The major contaminants are water soluble consisting primarily of mobile, volatile organics (principally TCE and chloroform) and inorganics (nitrates and sulfates) . The groundwater contains virtually no heavy metals. Zone 2 has no residential population and very limited commercial use. Contaminated groundwater from this zone is designated as Stream B. Zone 3: Lower Canyon Area The lower canyon zone extends from the mid-canyon extraction wells southward to the lower canyon (freeway) groundwater extraction system that is being constructed across the plume just north of Highway 60. This zone contains low to moderate groundwater contamination. Contaminants primarily consist of mobile, volatile organics (principally ICE and chloroform) and inorganic sulfate and nitrate compounds. No surface soil or surface water contamination related to the Stringfellow Site was found in this zone during the Remedial Investigation. Zone 3 contains one private residence, two active business concerns (excluding the rock quarry), and other privately owned land. Contaminated groundwater from this zone is designated as Stream C. Zone 4: Glen Avon Community The Glen Avon community zone includes the area from Highway 60 southward to the southernmost edges of the plume of contaminated groundwater stemming from the Stringfellow Site. Groundwater contamination is the only known present impact from the site, and is restricted to low levels of a small number of mobile, volatile organics (principally ICE and chloroform) , and inorganics (nitrates and sulfates). Present contamination levels are above drinking water standards, which prevents use of the affected portion of the aquifer as a potable water source. Zone 4 is densely populated. Contaminated groundwater from this zone is designated as Stream D. Six major alternatives have been identified to address these zones of contamination. Brief descriptions of the remedial alternatives evaluated in the FS are provided below, with additional information in Attachment 2. In the draft FS, these remedial alternatives (RA) are numbered 2, 3, 4A, 4B, and 5. The preferred alternative, RA 6, is not identified separately in the draft FS, but contains elements of the other alternatives. RA 1, is the no-action alternative and would discontinue on-site and mid- canyon groundwater extraction and treatment that is presently performed. This RA did not undergo detailed evaluation in the FS since it did not protect 3 human health and the environment nor meet many of the other criteria established for cleanup of the Superfund site. �.✓ The remaining RAs focus on the remedial actions proposed for Zone 1, the on- site area. Table 1 briefly describes each of the remaining remedial alternatives. TABLE 1 DESCRIPTION OF REMAINING REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES Remedial Alternative Description No. 2 Natural flushing of the on-site area and downgradient plume cleanup. No. 3 On-site dewatering, extraction, and treatment of on-site leachate, and downgradient plume cleanup. No. 4A On-site dewatering, extraction, and treatment of on-site leachate, in situ soil-gas extraction, in situ soil flushing, and downgradient plume cleanup. No. 4B On-site dewatering, extraction, and treatment of on-site leachate, in situ soil-gas extraction, selective soil excavation of higher contamination areas, soil treatment and redisposal on-site, in situ soil flushing, and downgradient plume cleanup. No. 5 On-site dewatering, extraction, and treatment of on-site leachate, full excavation of all diggable soil, soil treatment followed by redisposal on-site into the excavation, and downgradient plume cleanup. No. 6 On-site dewatering with extraction and treatment of on-site leachate, in situ soil-gas extraction, treatability studies, and downgradient plume cleanup. 4 �..� Common to all the remaining RAs, including the preferred alterative, RA 6, are the continuation of the existing and planned groundwater management activities for Zones 2, 3, and 4 that were initiated through earlier clean-up actions. These actions include: 0 The continued operation of the mid-canyon extraction well system and pretreatment plant, and disposal of the treated effluent to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) industrial sewer line for additional treatment at a publicly-owned treatment works (POTW), i.e., the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. o The construction and operation of the lower canyon extraction well system, and treatment of the extracted groundwater at the mid- canyon pretreatment plant. 0 The construction and operation of an extraction well system and treatment system in the community area, south of Highway 60.. o Disposal options for the treated water from the lower canyon and community well systems include discharge to the SARI line and the Districts or to the local agency for treatment and reclamation in Riverside County. The long-term plan is to reinject the treated water to flush the soil and remove the pollutants. The flushing will accelerate the soil clean-up process. RA 2 depends on the natural flushing of the site and uses the existing and some new extraction wells to remove the water-soluble contaminants over a long time period. RAs 3, 4A, 4B, 5, and 6 all include on-site dewatering, extraction, and treatment of on-site leachate through the existing pretreatment system, and attempting to isolate the contaminated soils from coming in contact with uncontaminated ground and surface water. RAs 4A and 4B involve in situ methods of removing volatile organic contaminants by evacuating the soil and condensing the organic vapors. Both of these RAs also include using treated groundwater to wash the contaminated soil and remove soluble contaminants. RA 46 includes selective soil excavation of identified "hot spots". Besides on-site dewatering, extraction and treatment of on-site leachate, RA 5 includes excavation of all diggable soil, the treatment of same to immobilize the pollutants, and then redisposal on-site. This alternative would leave residual contamination on-site in the decomposed granite and bedrock so that it would still be necessary to continue groundwater extraction and treatment for years after excavation activities are completed. 5 DOHS PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE / RA 6 is the preferred alternative. It comprises elements of the RAs examined in the FS for Zone 1, the on-site area, and proposes to dewater by using surface extraction wells, to implement soil-gas extraction if field tests prove favorable, and to conduct concurrent treatability studies to determine whether there is a feasible method for further addressing on-site soils and bedrock contamination. RA 6 also proposes to continue the existing and planned groundwater management activities for Zones 2, 3, and 4 described above. RA6 provides for continued discharge of the treated groundwater to the Sanitation Districts' sewerage system via SAWPA and the Santa Ana River Interceptor sewer. RA 6 meets all of the nine Superfund evaluation criteria and was supported by the Glen Avon community at a public meeting covering the draft FS on September 20, 1988. Subsequent to the release of the FS, the estimated amount of groundwater expected to be removed by the well system in the community area was recalculated. This recalculation resulted in a much lower estimated groundwater yield which affected the estimated costs and cleanup time that had previously been presented. Because the level of confidence in cost estimates is accurate within -30 to +50 percent, the estimated cost of the preferred alternative is essentially equal to the estimated cost of the less expensive alternative. The costs and approximate time until groundwater cleanup is achieved for each alternative is presented in Table 2. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS The EPA and DOHS have been working with the Potential Responsible Parties (PRP - those companies identified as having disposed of hazardous wastes to the site) to take over the removal, treatment, and disposal of the contaminated community area groundwater. The PRPs are finalizing their plans to install their test wells in the community of Glen Avon. Information from these tests will lead to the design of the groundwater remediation project in the community area south of the 60 freeway, approximately one mile south of the site, for the extracted groundwater to be treated to the local sewering agency requirements. This would then allow the treated wastewater to be sewered and then after additional treatment by the Jurupa Community Sanitary District reclaimed and used for irrigation purposes. REF H090242.RP 6 TABLE 2 REVISED REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES ESTIMATED COST COMPARISON - OVERALL SITE REMY RA RA RA RA RA me No. 2 No. 3 No. 4A No. 48 No. 5 No. 6 Approxfmate Zone 1 448 Years Never 65 Years 60 Years 63 Years a. (2) Below Time until Groundwater Zone 2 162 Years 162 Years 46 Years 46 Years 46 Years 46 Years Cleanup is Achieve91) Zone 3 40 Years 40 Years 40 Years 40 Years 40 Years 40 Years Zone 4 25 Years 25 Years 25 years 25 Year. 25 Yeers 25 Years Estimated Capital Coats (million S) 340.7 S44.2 $55.5 S253.3 3630.9 $66.7(2) Estimated Present North Cosbts 7%Discount Rate (million S) $131.2 $156.2 S197.8 S392.3 $741.7 S186.0(2) RA 6 is the DNS/EPA Preferred Alternative. b Present worth carbines capital costs and operation processes and evaluatiae based an EPA's and maintenerce costs. The discount rate is used to nine superfund criteria. convert future operation and maintenance costs into (3) Capital and present worth costa shown for Us 2, todey's dollars. cost estimates were made following 3, 4A, 48, and 5 are slightly changed fraa Nose EPA guidelines. Actual costs cwld vary by -30 to sham in the Draft IS Report prfwrfly due to +50 Percent. For a corplete caiparison of ronedial changes in the estimated groundwater flow rate. alternatives, camult the Stringfellow Draft IS (4) RA 6 ..is include $5 million for evaluation of Report or the Technical Suanery. additional soil treatment processes. (5) All costs shown are adjusted to January 109 (1) Predicting the tive required for groundwater using a factor of 5.9% for 1985-89 based an the cleanup is extremely difficult and existing wthods Engineering News Record construction index. are inexact. The years should be considered as (6) At costs sawn assure the dfsposel of treated rough estimates only, and are provided for sidmtrem s to the Sent. Are Regional Interceptor coaparison purposes. (SARI) india[rial sewer line. (2) Time for cleanup and estimated costs for Zace 1 may be affected by future on-site actions taken as a result of pilot testing of soil treatment 7 ` ATTACHMENT 1 NOTHERN Stringfellow Site Plan PITAREA MID-CANYON _ • 1 WELL NO. IW3 .: y, - :'• 'SOUTHERN yd - �� • PITAREA s LOWER CANYON . • ! • • `,JI,-, WAM&FUT • • ---MID CANYON • LOWER CANYON WELL NO . MW-17B • GLEN AVON • `���, PYRITE CHANNEL COMMUNITY GLEN AVON WELL NO. FC-211A2 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Figure 3-1. Location of Wells Selected as Representing Average Contaminant Concentrations for Mid-Canyon, Lower Canyon, and Conununity. Taken from Draft Report: Stringfellow Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study; May 30, 1986; DOHS 04 18. 90 10 : 1F AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLOW PO ! ATTACHMENT 2 Tut /01- , STRIN FELLOW UPDATE PUBLISHED BY THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS SECTION TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL DIVISION,STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES FFORUARY/MARCH 1989 DHS, EPA announce Proposed Plan to clean up Stringfellow The California Department of Kaolin Services(DHS)and heavily contaminated groundwater present on-silo.Dewatering the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)are proposing would be followed by Implementation of soilgae extraction, if a cleanup plan that addresses the contamination problems field tests prove favorable,to remove volatile organic contami. posed by the Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site. located In nants from on-site soil. In addition,treatabilily studies to deter. Pyrite Canyon now the community of Glen Avon, in Riverside mine whether there Is a feasible method for further addressing County,Califomla.The Proposed Plan identities the agencies' on-she soil and bedrock contamination, mold bit conducted preferred alternative,and summarizes all alternatives for clean• concurre'tty,with dewatering and soil-gas extraction. If treata- ing up she-relined contamination that were evaluated in the bility studies support the implementation of specific treatment June 1988 Draft Feasibility Study(FS)Report. technologies.those technologies will be evaluated for appllca- The Proposed Plan follows the requirements prescribed tion at the Stringfelfm Site. The agencies will use EPA's nine under the federal Superfund program. Superhund commonly Superfund evaluation criteria(see page 15 in deciding whether refers to the 1960 federal law called the Comprehensive to implement a particular technology. Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act RA 6 also proposes to continue the existing and planned (CERCLA). In 1986, the Superfund Amendments and groundwater management activi les for the mid-canyon,lower Reauthorization Act (SARA) was s;gned :nto law mod!yirg carryon,and community areas that were Initiated through ear. CERCLA. liar cleanup actions and evaluated in the Draft FS.These are DHS and EPA encourage the public to comment on all common to all the RAs.except the no action alternative. dear p alternatives considered for the Stringfellow Site. eased on any new information,or public Inpul,the agencies' may modify the preferred alternative,or select another aftema- lNe evaluated in the Draft FS.A copy of the Draft FS.and other Community Meeting site-related documents are available for public review at the The public is Invited to attend an upcoming meetmg of the repositories listed on page 10. Bidngtelbw Advisory Commmee regarding cleanup therna- tivasfor the Stringfellow Site. Preferred Altemative Wednesday,March ts,laea The praferrad alternative, although hot separately identi- 7:00.RM. fied in the Draft FS, 'a a combination of particular elements of Stringfellow Community Information Center 9007 Women Boulevard the remedial alternatives e by that were unity tie i in the Drag Glen Avon FS, and suggestions made by the community during a public meeting held on September 20, 1988.For purposes of discus. s;or,the preferred alternative is designated as RA 6. RA 6 proposes to dewmer the on-site area by using Public Comment Period surface extraction wells to remove a significant portion of the February 28 to March 31, 1989 During the public comment period, you are encouraged to comment on all the allematives evaluated to clean up the Tits issue of the Stringfellow update serves as the official Stringlesow Silo.Comments can be submitted either orally or DHS/EPA Proposed Plan describing the preferred ahemo in writing of the community meeting.Wrihen comments(posh lave for dealing with Stringlel!ow Slur contamination. marked no later than March 31.lae9)can also be sent to: iStringli Sae background information . ... . . . . . page 2 Conleminaeol summary. . , . page 3 Beth Jlnee Summ?ry of remedial alternatives....... ......page a SWngfeOnw,Project Protonic!�lernative California mint of Health Smlces Evaluation cmerle . .. ....................... page 6 Toxic Substance,Control Division preferred alternative analysis ............ page 7 400 P Street.P.O.Box 942732 Remedial alternative coal comparison........... page s Sa:Rrnenf4 U99230-7320 Cmmuniy participation . ... ...... . .......' , page 9 Fur meamfommon. ..... ............. .. . page 10 Fer assistance on preparing your comments,see page 9. 04. 18. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM:'FPC STRINGFELLOW PO i Stringfellow Site Background Information The Stringfellow She Is located In Pyrite Canyon one mile full-scale FS was performed to identify and evaluate allerTsr north of Highway 60 near the ocimmunity of Glen Awn in River- tives for site cleanup. side County, California. From 19W to 1972, the Stringfellow The RI determined that while the earlier actions helped to Site was an authorized industries waste disposal facility.During alleviate some of the groundwater Contamination problems, this period approximately 34 million gallons of liquid industrial they were not enough to ensure the protection of public health wastes were disposed of at the site.Wastes primarily consisted and the environment. Scientists also determined that the vari. of spent acids and caustles, solvents, pesticide by-products, ous chemical and physical processes that have occurred on. metals.and other organic and morganle contaminants. site and downgradient are complex. The combination of site operations, chemical reactions, Contaminated Groundwater Plume he formation and off-site migration of leachate (heavily con- Contaminated groundwater),the infiltration of clean water into the Liquid wastes were deposited Into unlined pits located $he,surface water runoff,and the volatilization processes that throughout the 17-acre site. Some of the wastes from these turn llquidwastes into gases,have all affected the on-site waste ponds migrated downward and entered the groundwater sys- mass — producing heterogenously contaminated soils and tem below the she.Clean groundwater flowing into the site area groundwater that have the potential to affect human health. mixed with contaminants creating a plume of contaminated The Draft FS Report.which was released for public review groundwater. Even though the ponds of chemical liquids were in June 1980.is the culmination of all previously prepared doc- removed,the mixing of clean groundwater with residual chemi- uments.It presents detailed evaluations of five alternatives that cal wastes In the on-site soils continues today(see page 9). address soil and groundwater contamination associated with The concentrations of contaminants within the plume are the site and the community of Glen Avon. dependent upon the chemical and physical interactions within the soil and bedrock of Pyrite Canyon. The further the plume Contamination Pathways extends to the south,the less the contamination becomes.The plume follows the natural groundwater flow of the aquifer and There are several pathways that are associated with the presently extends approximately 12,000 feet South-southwest release of contaminant into the the environment. Prircipai of the site under Glen Avon(seas the map on page 3). pathways br contaminant transport are: • Migration of residual water soluble on-site wastes down. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study ward into the groundwater. In 1980181,the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control • Lateral movement of contaminated groundwater down. Board implemented an Interim Abatement Program as the first gradient through Pyrite Canyon. phase of site closure. The program Included removal of all Other potential pathwayst. r contaminant transport are: surface liquids, partial neutralization and capping of the , Bansport of contaminated soil by wind and surface wastes. construction of surface water channeis, installation of numerous groundwater extraction wells in the on-site and mid- water. canyon areas,and construction of a clay core barrier dam and a Transport of soluble contaminant by surface water. :sachets collection system. During the Stringfellow Site's history,all of these pathways In 1983/114, a fast-track Remedial ImrestigationlFeasibiiity, may have contributed to the release of contaminants from the Study(RIMS)was completed.It resulted in an interim measure site mostly downgradient through Pyrite Canyon.Past releases involving construction and operation of the mid-canyon well of wastes from the site into Pyrite Channel are known to have system and pretreatment plant, with disposal of the treated resulted in downgradient contamination of surface water and effluent to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor(SARI)industnal soils. Presently, surface runoff and erosion of contaminated sewer line !or additional treatment at a publicly-owned treat. soil is mnimal due to the preventive Interim controls it place at ment works(POTW). the site. Also.air emissions measured from the site during the A full-scale Stringfellow RI was cenductad to determine RI were not hazardous as defined by standards criteria and the extent of contaminatier problems posed by the site.while a regional background levels. Currently,the greatest risk ro the Glen Avon community is from cor•taminated grodndwater migrating from the site into the aquifer under Glen Avon. The contaminated groundwater plume contains at least two organic contaminants TCE and chloroform, and two inorganic contaminants, nitrates aril sul. ^ '. fares,that are above drinking water standards or guidelines.To date,however.no direct oublic water Sources(private or service _,.,..•^r'.-{+"' - wells) have been found to be contamina'.ad above drinking ' - +'•� water standards or guidelines. As an added precaution. the State has hooked up nearly S00 Glen Avon residences t9 an alternate water supply. " For a look at how clean water becomes contaminated see page 9. Shcwn above is the on-site area(Zone 1)a the SMngfellow Site. e 04: 18.. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLOW P02 Stringfellow Site Plan NAPXGw �• uazxD , aGrwwP vw! °'i'a'r°a'uurAO.lfu'ino p ♦ � .,muryav ♦ p N°MM4uTlN G' tVV.rnr y �wur t SbiF/ p wG.n.,...N..x../•e.0 m a 8iF °G �•+ �� io.rGu.mx Ra S a,,�p Fr oLaNt� a<�e G P• mv[t `'27 9 O ilONF]I PW°OE[D OPOVNOwwTEv[.inGCnON • p PND Pl11WECi10N W6LL 6V6®E'M gyp, aVF!VN�' vw. i .p IW ee•� 4i • NIpN ° a ftENEYEGNY • s • G LMWG - .. e a•°p.K il��l C The large map shows the plume of contaminated groundwater that exrands from We St.—ngreliav Sao inro Glen Aran.morw(mv and extraction waIft and me Efimerent geographic zones of the site Also shown is the area where me Laver Carryon Groundwater Extraction S}S. 's cumenify being consmroed. The inset map shows possible iocadons of exrlaCdon and rerf?Ctiorn wells met wN comprfss,trip Community GrotindWato Exmacrfcn System south of Highway 600 Glen Avon. Contamination Summary Areas of the Stringfellow Site and the community of Glen Zone 3: Lower Canyon Area Avon are designated as specific geographic zones (see map The lower canyon zone extends from the mid-canyon above). Descriptions below briefly summarize the location and extraction wells southwaro to the lower canyon (freeway) contamination problems of each zone. groundwater extraction system that is being constructed Zone 1:On-site/Upper Mid-Canyon Area across the plume just north of Highway 60.This zone contains low to moderate groundwater contamination. Contaminants The or sitetupper mid-canyon mine includes the original primarily consist of mobile, volatle organics (principally TCE disposal area consisting of approximately 17 acres in the nonh- and chloroform)and inorganic sulfate and nitrate compounds. ern area of Pyrite Canyon southward to an imaginary line about No surface soil or surface water contamination related to the 600 feet south of the subsurface barrier wall. On-site ground- Stringfellow Site was found in this zone during the Remedial water is heavily contaminated with a large number of organic Investigation. Zone 3 contains one private residence, two and inorganic contaminants including heavy metals. Zone f active business concerns iexcluding the rock quarry). and has no esieential or cemmercial population. Contaminated other privately-owned land. Contaminated groundwater from groundwater from this zone is designated as Stream A. this zone is designated as Stream C. Zone 2: Mid-carryon Area Zone 4:Glen Avon Community The mid-canyon zone encompasses the portion of Pyrite The community zone includes the area tram Highway 60 Canyon the!extends from the soulhem edge of Zone 1 south- southward to the southernmost edges of the plume of contsmi- wam to the existing set of mid-canyai extraction wells. This nated groundwater stemming from the Stringfellow Site. -one contains a moderately to heavily contaminated ground- Groundwater contamination is the only known present impact � talr plume but no Identified slWrelated soil contamination. from the site.and is restricted to low levels of a small number of "Rha major comaminairs are water solubie consisting primarily mobile,volatile organics(principally TCE and chloroform).and of mobile. volatile organics (principally TOE and chloroform) inorgari frifrates and sulfates).Present contamination levels and inorganics initiates and sulfates). The groundwater oon. are above drinking water standards,which prevents use of the tains virtually no heavy metals.Zone 2 has no residential popu- affected portion of the acluder as a potable water source.Zone lahon and very limited commercial use.Contaminated ground- 4 is densely populated. Contaminated groundwater from this water from this zone Is designated as Stream a zone is designated as Stream 0. a 04. 18. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLOW P08 Summary of Remedial Alternatives Brief tlsacdptions of the romadinl alternatives evaluated In • The Construction and operation of the lower canyon the Stringfellow Draft Feasibility Study (FS) Report are pro- extraction wall system,and treatment of the extracted ground- vldod below. In the Draft FS these remedial aftemetives(RAS) water at the mid-canyon pretreatment plant. arenumbeted2,3,4A,48,and5. Some of the alternatives use • The construction and operation of an extraction and many of the same technologies. The preferred altematNe RA reinfection well system In the community area, seulh of High- . 6. although not Identified separately In the Draft FS, Contains way 60. elements of the other alternatives,end Is based upon avallable The summary of the remaining RAS, therefore,will focus information and public comment. on the remedial actions proposed for Zone 1,the on-site area. RA 1,the no action alternative, would involve discontinu- ing on-site(Stream Al and mid-canyon(Stream 8)groundwater extraction end treatment that is presently performed. Also, there would be no effort to:minimize the generation of contami- Remedial Alternative nated leschate from the on-site area;or to clean up or stop the Natural flushing of the on-she area and downgradlent further migration of the downgradient plume. plume cleanup. This RA did not undergo detailed evaluation in the FS Improved surface water drainage controls, a multitayered since it does not protect human health end the environment. Cot, and some new extraction wells near the barrier dam would nor attain legally applicable or relevant and appropriate be Installed.No other new measures would be taken to mini- requirements(ARARs)of federal and state public health and mize the future generation of contaminated groundwater at the envimnmental laws.Additionally,this RA does not achieve any Site. Water that percolates into the ground further up Canyon reduction in ihetoxicity,mobility,or volume of the contaminants (upgradient) from the site ultimately passes through the oon- present at the Stringfellow She. taminated onsile material and mixes with leachers (heavily Common to all the remaining RAs,including the preferred contaminated groundwater). Groundwater is allowed to alternative RA 6, are the continuation of the existing and become contaminated making the extraction welts near the planned groundwater management activities for Zones 2, 31 barrier dam and in the mid-canyon responsible for intercepting and 4 that were initiated thmugh earlier clean-up actions, and removing Contaminated groundwater for the foreseeable These scions Include: future. The natural flushing action would eventually remove • The continued operation of the mid-canyon extraction water Soluble Contaminants over a long lime perlod- well system and pretreatment plant•and disposal of the treated Zone 1 —ma-or on-site actions: effluent to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor(SARI)industrial 1 sewer Ilia for additional treatment at a publicly-owned treat- • Construction of surface water drainage cnanuels at the marl works(POTW). north and south ends of the site. On-Site Dewatering 0C.TIAIN we„e ' ON.titli . 0 o c d a saeerweo gxn €iu�ion - W:. wneane o.•a.,i,s wnu Shown here is one scheme forlboaling surface-eesedgmunowareremaixMn walls,^.eftl that wrticompriso the on-sire dewatering(gmune ,vale,removal!system. welts installed on me sire's sumac•(fight,will extend into the ground below the current water level. As woes of dniteo.mB holes are encased will)p/ping filet has a screened section A"the bottom of the pipe. Pumps in the wolAs will draw,the water idownwardink,me scrosnedsecdon ofmi;welimnn upwam mmugh me pipe:oholding tanks on the surface lors"ge prior to treatment Th.'s process wet gradvalh/lower me water table and remove a ognilicant pardon of tiro onsim ContaminahM groundwater RamOVlmg this water w,a sudirdeney dry out me sae so Soll-gas extraction operedcns and sal frestabrk'ry Costs can be conducted. I A 04, 18,. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLGW P03 a Regrading of the on.she surface,Installation of a multi- Remedial Alternative 48 layered cap and Improved on-site surface drainage. • Continued extraction of Stream A leachate in the vicin- On site dewatering, extraction and treatment of on-site �a../ity of thebarrierdam. laschate, In-situ solbgee extraction, selective sell excava- • Inslellstien of additional leachate extraction wells in the lion of higher contamination areas, soil treatment and gravel drain just north of the subsurface barrier wall redispo uil on-alle, irrslfu soil flushing, and downgrddient plume cleanup. This remedial alternative I$Similar to RA 4A except that it incorpondu a selective excavation of identified "hot spots" Remedial Alternative 3 and treatment action between soll-gas extraction and soil flush- ing. Removing a portion of the contaminated on-she soil mass 0"ita dewatering, extraction and treatment of on-she should result in a slightly shorter flushing time,and would also leaehato,and downgredient plume cleanup require treatment of a smaller amount of contaminated water RA 3 would involve dewatering to lower the water table in than RA 4A. bewatering, soil-gas extraction, and soil Flushing the o"Ite area(Zone 1)largely to Isolate the contaminants in would be conducted in the same manner as in RA 4A. the soil from the natural groundwater flow. Initial dewatering Zone t —major on-site actions: would remove a significant portion of the existing on-sae water soluble contamination mass.Although this remedial alternative • Construction of surface water drainage channels at the would leave contaminated soils and materials in place, it north and south ends of the site. attempts to isolate them from coming in contact with uncon. • Initial dewatering of the on-site area, and treatment of laminated ground and surface water. Improved surface water the extracted water at the pretreatment plant. drainage controls and a new multilayered cap would minimize • Implementation of soil-gas extraction in the on-site future percolation of surface water into the site. area,it field tests prove favorable. • Excavation and treatment of soil from areas of higher Zone 1 —major on-site action: contamination(hot spots)and redisposal ors-site. • Constructldn of surface water drainage channels at the • After wil-gas extraction,implementation of soil flushing north and south ends of the she. using treated water to Hush out remaining water soluble a Initial dewatering of the on-sae area, and treatment of contaminants. the extracted water at the pretreatment plant. • Continued operation of the dewatering system to • Continued operation of the dewatering system and remove flushing water and treatment of the extracted water at treatment of the extracted water at the pretreatment plant. the pretreatment plant. • Regrading of the o"ite surface, installation of a multi- • Installation of a multilayered cap. layered cap,and improved on-site surface drainage. Remedial Alternative 5 Remedial Alternative 4A On-site dewatering, extraction and treatment of on-site loachate, Pull excavation of all diggable wit,snit treatment On-site dewatering, extraction and treatment of on-stte followed by redlsposal on-site into the excavation, and feachate, In-situ soil-gee extraction. in-shu SON flushing, downgradient plume cleanup. and downgradient plume cleanup. Full excavation would include removal of the On-stte cap, After initial dewatering, in-situ actions of this remedial soil in the alluvium layer,diggable,(removable without blasting) alternative would accelerate cleanup in the on-sxe and mid- decomposed granite and rock, and wit from the sides of the canyon areas. Soil-gas extraction,if field tests prove favorable, on-site area. Excavation would also include the upper mid- would remove volatile organic contaminants (primarily TCE) canyon area south of the subsurface barrier wall and possibly from contaminated soils, while flushing of the wit with dean the barrier wall itself. Since it is of possible to remove all water would..remove water soluble organics and inorganics. diggable material at once, a continuous cycle at excavation. The dewatering system would also function m the collection treatment and redisposal,with appropriate stockpiling prior:o system for flushed out water. and after treatment would occur. RA 5 would leave residual Zone 1 —major on-site actions: contamination on-site in the decomposed granite and bedrock ] below the excavation limits, So it would be necessary to con, • Construction of surface water drainage channels at the tine groundwater mn.clion and treatment for years after north and South ends of the site. excavation activities are completed.Dewatering woulo be con. • Initial dewatering of the on-site area, and treatment of ducted in the same manner as in RA 3. the extracted water at the pretreatment plant. Or 1 —ma • Implementation of scii-gas extraction In the on-site Zone ] on-site actions: area,if field tests prove favorable. • Construction,of surface water drainage channels at the • After soil-gas extraction.implementation of wit flushing north and south ends of the site. sing treated water to Rush out remaining water soluble a Initial dewatering of the on-site area, and treatment of ,,�ntaminants. the extracted water attire pretreatment plant. • Continued operation of the dewatering system to a Excavation and treatment of diggable contaminated remove flushing water and treatment of the extracted water at material followed by redisposal on-site. the pretreatment want. • Continued operation of the dewatering system and 0 Installation of a multilayered cap. treatment of the extracted water at the pretreatment plant. 04. 18. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLOW P09 DHS/EPA PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Remedial Alternative 6 • Inhlal dewatering of the on-site area, and treatment of the extracted water at the pretreatment plant. On-site drrwatenrrg with extraction and Imertmem of on•she • Implementation of soil-gas extraction in the on-site leachate, in-situ soil-gas extraction, tractability studies, area,if field tests prove favorable. and downgmdlent plume cleanup. • Continued o The preferred alternative is comprised or elements of the partition the daw aritple artl treatment of the extracted wateerr at the pretreatment piers. Rep examined I1 the 5trIngon-site ones. RA Draft Feasibility Study • Treatablli studies — Dunn the Implementation of Report.For face x the on-site area, le 6 proposes to dowatercoon N 9 P by using surface extraction wells,implement soil-gas extraction dewatering andwiigae exlrecllon,potential treatment techrtol• if field tests prove favorable,and conduct concurrent treatablllty, ogles for application to the on-site contaminated soils will be studies to determine whether there Is a feasible method for further examined. Potential studies may include sail washing, further addressing on-site soil and bedrock contamination.RA vitrification, wit flushing, and possibly others. If tmatability 6 also proposes to continue the existing and planned ground- studies support the implementation of specific treatment tech- water management activities for Zones 2,3,and 4. nologres, they will be evaluated for application at the String- fellow Site.The agencies will use EPAI;nine Supertund evalua• Zone 1 —major on-site actions: llon criteria In deciding whether to implement a particular • Construction of surface drainage channels at the north technology. and South ends of the site. • Installation of a multilayered cap. Superfund Evaluation Criteria Overall objectives for cleanup of the StringMlow Site Short-term effectiveness involves the timeframe and associated groundwater contamination are guided by needed to achieve protection from any adverse impacts on the requirements of the federal Supertund law Supertund human health and the environment that maybe posed dux- ing the construction and implementation period until clean- requires that all potential clean-up alternatives be analyzed relative to nine evaluation criteria and that the preferred up goals am achieved. alternative meet the four Supertund statutory requirements Long-term effectiveness and permanence Were to that are derived from these criteria.The chart below lists the the ability of a remedial alternative to maintain protection of nine criteria(left)and the four statutorymquirements(right). human health and the environment over time once clean-up Brief explanations of the nine crtena follow goals have been met. MptNTgN Oi MN6 Psoncnon or,mac Reduction of toxicity, mobifity or voWme (TMV) ATTAWMmT Or 11Ye. ATTAINWNT or A.AA. stars to the anticipated performance of the treatment tech. nologies a remedial ahemalive may employ Implei rr10.TTarrx a'ICRIVCRl9 ca�u,Tw...r.crrvaara efeasreity of try refers to the technical and atlmy of Tox.cm.rows, trateri feasibility and s services a remedy, including the availability n wurr.xeovcnoa coanerremrvenees materials and ServiC83 needed t0 implement the chosen ,r.uArxTAwry uracnnae OF PIMA- solution. j en sowtwrs Axo i.'IATME To e coal r ran'r o ENT m Coot evaluates the estimated capital and present worth i mxcrx:Aeu!r mar; costs of each altern ative.Present worth costs inci ude capital ru,PPc.r Aaeaer AeeertAirce P coats and annual operation and maintenance costs over the corrurmr AccsvrAxes I life of an alternative in today's dollars. Overall protection of human health and the emri on. State (support agency) acceptance indicates ment(HHaE)addresses whether or not a clean-up remedy whether, based on its review of the RI/FS and the Proposed provides adequate protection and describes how risks are Plan,the State conours with.opposes, or has ne comment eliminated, reduced or controlled through treatment. engi- on the preferred alternative. nearing controls,or institutions]controls. Community acceptance indicates if community con• Compliance with ARARS addresses whether or not a earns are addressed by the preferred aflems",re and it th clean-up remedy unit meet all of the applicable or relevant community has a preference for a particular mmed and appropriate requirements of state and tederal environ• Although public comment is an important part of the final mental laws and regulations or other environmental star- decision. EPA is compelled by law to balance community `. utes,andlor provide grounds for Invoking a waiver. concerns with all of the previously mentioned entails. I e 04. 18. 90 1 0 : 15 AM * CDMiFPC STRINGFELLQW P05 RA B ANALYSIS Preferred alternative meets the nine Superfund evaluation criteria Overall objectives for cleanup of the Stringfellow Site and If troatability studies support the implomontation of specific associated groundwater contamination are guided by the treatment technologies,they will be evaluated for application at requirements of the federal SupwilUnd law.Supedund requires the Stringfellow Site,based on EPAs nine criteria, that all potential clean-up alternath es be analyzed relative to nine evaluation criteria and that ere preferred alternative meet Reduction of toxicity, mobility or volume four statutory requirements that are derived Irom these criteria (sea box page 6). This approach is designed to provide deci- (TMV) sionervirere with sufficient information to adequately compare The groundwater extraction and treatment elements for the alternatives,select a preferred alternative.and safisty legal Zones 2,3,and 4 of each remedial alternative examined In the requirements. FS will reduce the toxicity,mobility or wiume(TMV)of contami Summarized below ;s the performance of the preferred nation.The preferred alternative.RA 6,would also reduce TMV aternative against the nine criteria in comparison to the other in Zone 1 es ful. ring and soil-gas extrec;ion if Feld tests alternatives.It is anticipated that the preferred alternative wilC Drove successful. • Protect human health and the environment; • Comply with applicable or relevant and appropriate Short-term effectiveness requirements(ARARs); Risks associated with implementation of each element of • Be cost-effective; all RAs can be addressed with various engineering commis xi- • Use permanent solutions and alternative treatment and standard health and safety protection g technologies or resource recovery technologies to the ma mum axiom practicable(MEP). Imps@mentability Overall protection of human health and RAs 2 3, and 4A are constructible and would use Stan. the environment card construction practices.RAs 4B and 5 present the greatest design,logistical and Implementation problems outs to the vast All of the RAs,with the exception of the no action alterna- quantity of on-site contaminated sod and waste requiring exca- tive(RA 1),would provide adequate protection of human health vatlon and handling.The preferred alternative, RA 5, includes and the environment by eliminating, reducing or controlling the constructible elements of RA 4A contamination risks through treatment, engineering controls, or Institutional controls. The preferred alternative would: Cost the volume of contaminated water through surface water controls;lower the on-SRO water table and further reduce There are no costs for RA 1, the no action alternative. the volume of contaminated groundwater through dewatering; Capital and present worth costs are shown in the box on page reduce the risk from exposure to volatile organics through scrF B.Present worth costs were calculated at fbe 7?5 discount rate. gas extraction; and further examine possible sell treatment Also listed are the estimated groundwater cleanup times for all options to assess their applicability to clean up on-site soils. site zones. Compliance with ARARs State(support agency) acceptance All the RAs examined In the FS.with the exception of the The State of California supports the preferred alternative. no action alternative and the proposed actions of RA 3 for Zone 1, would attain chemical-specific ARARs. The preferred after- t.'OmmUnl acceptance native,RA 6.would achieve ARARs for Zones 2, 3, and 4 and C� would examine the feasibility of implementing strategies to The preferred alternative was supported by repnesenta- accelerate the attainment of ARARs for Zone 1. fives of the Glen Awn community at a public meeting covering the Draft FS held on September 20, 19M.Community accep- t ong-term effectiveness and permanence Lance of the preferred plan will be further assessed in the Record of Decision (ROD), !blowing a review of public com- ments received on the Stringfellow Draft FS Report and the wells Mr on-site dawatenng. All technical components for Proposed Plan. extracti re ng and treating groundwater a reliable proven tech- nologiss. if mechanical components fail they can be quickly repaired No major problems with existing extracton wells have occurred and the Stringfellow pretreatment plant has met all permit requirements for contaminated groundwater treatment. 04. 18. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLOW P10 REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES ESTIMATED COST COMPARISON RA RA RA RA RA RA No,2 No.3 No.4A Na 48 No.5 No.6 Appmxlmate Zone 448 years Never 62years 55 years 63 years see(2)below Time Until Zone 162years 182 years 46 years 48 years. 46 years 48 years Groundwater Cleanup Is Zone 40 years 40 years 40 years 40 years 40 yam 40 years Achlfyiledf'f Zone 4 25 years 25 years 26yeers 25 years 26 years 25 ysers Estimated capltal Coals(million t1l) 40.3 46.0 55.8 244.0 620.8 64.2m Estimated Present Word Coats 7%Discount Rate(million 111) 129.6 .162.7 203.6 388.2 730.6 166.9m Present worth combines capital costs and operation and based on EPA%nine Supedund criteria. maintenance Costs. The discount rate Ia used to convert (3) Capital and present worth costs shown for RAs 2,3,4A, future operation and maintenance costs into today's dollars. 48,and 5 are slightly changed from those shown in the Cost estimates were made following EPA guidelines so call- Draft FB,Report due to changes in the estimated mated costs could vary by —30 or +5o percent.For a com- groundwater flow rate. plate comparison of remedial alternatives consult the String. (4) RA 6 costs Include$5 million for evaluation of additional fallow Draft FS Report or the Technical Summary. soil treatment processes. (1) Predicting the time required for groundwater cleanup is (5) All costs shown are adjusted to January 1989 using a .I extrerrelydlNicull and existing methods are Inexact.The factor of 5.901e for 19W89 based on the Engineering years should be considered as rough esflitales Only. News Record construction index. and are provided for comparison purposes. (6) All costs shown assume the disposal of treated side (2) Time forcleanup and estimated costs forgone l maybe streams to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) affected by future on-site actions taken as a result of pilot industrial sewer line. testing of soll treatment processes and evaluations Relationship of this Proposed Plan/Preferred Alternative to other Stringfellow Site clean-up actions The purpose of this proposed plan Decision (ROO) on July 18. 1984, that ation of a well system to extract comaml. is to address the overall clean-up strat- selected an interim measure to extract, mated groundwater from the lower egy at the Stringfellow Sltecomprehen- treat, and dispose of contaminated canyon area for treatment at the mid- sively, by proposing to continue the groundwater from the on-site and mid- canyon pretreatment pfant. Construc. existing and planned groundwater man- canyon areas. The Interim measure tion activities have been initiated, and agemerf aclivitles initiated through the included the construction and operation are expected to be completed later this agencies'earlier actions and to remedi- of a mid-canyon wall system and pre- year. ate the contamination in the on-site treatment plant, and diaposai of the • On June 30, 1988, OHS and area. treated effluent to the Santa Ana EPA proposed a plan for construction Earlier actions to address the Regional Interceptor (SARI) industrial and operation of a well system to extrac cleanup of the Stringfellow Site Indutle sewer Ilne Icr adtllllonal treatment at a and treat S1ringtellow-related conlar the following: publicly-owned treatment works mated groundwater from the commuri (PO TM area-Under this proposal,treated water • Based on a 19B3184 fast-track would be reinjected into the community Remedial investigationlFeasibility • On June 24, 1987. EPA issued aquifer.A ROD is expected to be issued Study(RIP-S), EPA'ssued a Record of another ROD for construction and oper. in the near future. B 04. 18. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM FPC STRINGFELLOW ? O6 Stringfellow Site Community Participation OHS and EPA have received comments from the commu- The Committee Is made up of community participants, hilt'on both the SMngfellow Remedial Investigation (RI) and elected representatives. and Ideal. state and Were] officials Draft Feasibility Study (FS) Reports. In addition, Comments that meet monthly in Glen Awn to review Stringfellow Site pro- have been received on the June 19W Proposed Plan for Con. gross and provide input to project staff. :aminated Groundwater Cleanup In Glen Awn,south of High- Written comments (postmarked no later than March 31, way 60. Many of these comments have been incorporated by 1989)can be sent to: OHS and EPA into the preferred alternative. Beth Jlnes Stringfellow Project Public comment period California Department of Health Services Toxic Substances Control Division The agencies encourage the public to review, and com. 400 P Street,P.O. Box 942732 ment on the preferred clean-up alternative(RA 6), as wall as Sacramento,CA 94234.7320 the dfier clean-up alternatives, evaluated for the Stringfellow (916)327-0979 Site.The public Comment period,which rune from February 28 to March 31. 1989, is your formal opportunity to participate in Making effective community comments the remedy selection process. Based on any new information or public input, the agen- To most effectively comment,the public is encouraged to pies' may modify the preferred alternative or select another state Is support or opposition for a particular alternative If alternative evaluated in the Draft FS. possible. it is best to comment on all the alternatives. When The public will have the opportunity to provide its com- judging an alternative, Consider the nine evaluation Chalons ments regarding the Proposed Plan and other clean-up alter- described on page 6. When commenting you should be spe- relives evaluated M the Stringfellow Site. Comments can W ci6c on how you feel a particular alternative does or does not submitted either orally or in writing to OHS ano EPA officials at adequa-.ely address an issue Comments will be used to pre, the: pare the ROD that will formally detail DHSIEPA plans for addressing contamination at the Stringfellow Site, Stringfellow Advisory Committeecommunity,Meeting For more detailed information on the Stringfellow Site — Wednesday,March 15, 1989 particularly the FS Report that has complete descriptions of all 7;00 P.M. the remedial alternatives,as well as Copies of all RIIFS nepons Stringfellow Community Information Center and other background materials—visit the information reposi. 9007 Mission Boulevard,Glen Awn tories listed on page 10. Formation of Contaminated Groundwater FMMeR WAsn oiarw/ rann ........ w'W rah Ili i , TMNDwA1aR FlLL :.' TAM i y • 14 1UM nit! i FlLL �: •ALW 'NO fa WUM AND L AND FILL D Posse awman t - — Dowr7wARe 1OODANY POf.N MiOMT10N aeDRotlr OOwNO GROUNOWATER WATiR—OMNITE FLOW •fOMf O/CdVTAM:NATIe JOKJ Thar artrt tendering(roe)depkts whate residual wastes horn former waste disposalpa+dr Jm IncarPd faPtmum and 4li layers in ,la`cn!^ me gmundwale,rable NnC die vithour star,dl subsurfaM sell and rock at fMa SnjMJ/aliow Sim ,(S Clean 4Ur/aCY wa1P'and gr^undWJMf (dght)mete into the aliuy(unn and lea layer JnS clean"far mlyes with residual wastes beco-ning corfaminaW lomung rfe dayngnd o.,n prune of: ntaminatcdgmund"uh, the plump is the key pathway of contaminant mignnon from me SeingfWw See. The asap on page 3 shows the entire plume. 9 STRINGFELLOW UPDATE PUBLISHED BY THE COMMUNI y RELATIONSSECTION TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL DNISION,STATE DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH SERVICES APRILISS9 a FACTSHEET DHS, EPA Revise Estimated Cleanup Costs Purpose theesdnd dcoe c uptlmaroarhatlbeenpresanbtl in me Community Groundwater Proposed Plan. In sodNan, The purpose of des fech Meet b to rally you Net me conaln miler rout ad uslens rs were madd to toe emlmeled Caftrin a Department of Heath Serness(DHS)and tie U.S. ced WMPaz presented in Ne Pomp Site Remedy Pm- Emiranmenbl Protection Agency(EPA),in respores b pumic posetl Plan. request,are annealing Me mmmem paned for Me Overall Site Remedy Proposed Plan Net was released as the Feeluvy/ March 1988SMglabow upped,In addition,DHS and EPA are REVISED ESTIMATED COMMUNITY offering an opportunity mcommant on Me Agenme5 revised GROUNDWATER CLEANUP COST COMPARISON re Overall dsenw met Propvtsore whits were Community o unm sired Mereundwa Sib Remedy Proposed was elMfe@es Me tin Groundwater Proposed Plan Nat was rseasatl n toe Jurrel omp fro as�n Jmyistastriglefew Upoata, psi tsem memavm slam sum, A forms comment pahed for the reread estimated cost compatscra b ret requeed under section 1V of the Cocotte 80t meioaomws ry a as >a herww EmmetmanW Response.Compensation and Libuctity wgrmdm Act(CERCLA),common y referred b as Supedwtl.Hmleser, shred the comment period for tie O,,amll Site Remedy Pro -Ifee pgv.eam :set n v w posed Plan be being ficu nded due to public request,DHS and •awrmasmi EPA debnMned Net soliciting for comments on me revised eadmated cost re cperparba would rM covasety affect f •e�amm:amrsma:ots Agencies'anticipated Sbingfelbw, e :N project schedul :�s®v�rrmer i4e a ni vs The preferred sfenamef deeco2atl in th Commnity u a .issessuss Groundwater and me Pretall Sib Remedy Pmposed Plane msvBk remain to mod feasible and aaxpbde of Me nembeial star. P,y�Rg. y naard9 lAdumed.despite t reYlWre Is N9 eMmaled WBb •feed lgae0a anddeanuptlme ---��--' �,®�! i4• a 93 9..1 Thacommenipe dosasgn May18,1989. •idpmimnm. m m..nv......rw.wa.mrswm.®mm�ea-m..m Background Information OnFWsed .—•��—•d®•m�®�.•®•.m..��em Estimated Cost Comparisons as In me Ju ti 198E Strmgfusi Update.DHS and EPA released a Proposed Plan to add sife+ebbd groundwater conssminatlon in tie community of Gen Awn,scri of HigR rvvowcu...o. way W.In me Febrray/Murch 19995aNgfepwv upside,DHS anti EPA released a second Proposed Plan to comprehmt- siwly address the ovardlcieanupstretegyldTtSbtngfellow How Have The Estimated Cost Sim Subsequent be ore release of me Community Gmi Comparisons Changed? water Proposed Plan, and based on public comments nararced.me aMmmstlon we ystem(sustained! s staine!yx4in be Community Gmdtenge tame mm Plan fees table coreradry nee iu;recnwellsystem(sudssetlyl rein Me in Community Greueepref Preposetl Plan (see ebb commu much area was recalculated.Tab r yield nnen resulted able)b Nat tie Agendas'prefes,s ch as Ma s no longer In a routs rower esnmded groundwater yield wniM affected me leas[shout detailed Cod estimates ng at Hasa worm are made without detailed engineering date, are normally mmected to M I"ofts whin -. a sti tartans Thera ere,given Nis level al confitlence,Me estitnatstl cost of Ina Summary of Remedial Alternatives of amen wa equat to me estmated cos Ra:e,rumiremedee E: Nmu:.l gesti:g prdm mmsiaweodtlwm MomaM linetpme Cmmmuect Ground imer(Years i- gaEievtplwvecleamq, son table is ere incnahmm estimated cleanup time(Years of RerveNal Atamvdeel:Oo-s'vedevaredvg.caamnaeduommof Operation andOccur). Meinbnenee) for each remedial sbmadue oo-lia M"•, evadwegM'rm gomerlmuR (bpe8n yijvsdOmWrrtat Ss cleanup tene estimate is npetledtpbe Mm byloe RemWel NlmpWwiA: oo-sia dewer<ridg,e¢ 'ov Wrmawem ofoo-sia IaeM1ue,imsim xoilgmmzdan,imwxoa dusbinH, Hweattraction eeti caniched cleanup al reb. amAfteme a•mqum ut, uv. Hmwwp me aster Men cleanup time pl me preferred s adwe RmeEW AhrmeiPhri Omsia- ucnvg.uorlion un i . ueng dsre fasts than coal of me lead edpareiw for(Si ofu.fh lhir io-simion iJ mn.xkni ws'ii w- using dispose fi e, Santa Ara Regional Inbrcepbr(SARI) donor hri,sr cunmmi 'w dl, n iiinip [aMmaiipmd intltabial ratified e amsi¢ina:m a:InwNog,mddomgadmm qumetlnnuP. The ratified comparisonat ebb shown10a above includes NmNhLAltem,wif Omliatlsvaadvg,urmmioo avtl rivummar areasnt worm carubnona at ] anti 10 percent which are she lrb, .,mal on-nit, u( fdiggeble sal.w9 demmem Mimi to Jar SARI 1989 daMon.The sr stopping cost uary dwraawl br mtispmal m-si:e into am unmimr.avtl dwngm- Mimi as idnecane rarrydisposal option.The sr sinpping cost uiem ftsm mrvp, bared maynetp lowdonarymaasurebaausemithout arga RaveEW neri dw r i triA rnetmed wore ec acre permit may net ow, i attle SARI line depose)w ality prer n..."acing witun•mionaM:mao:em or rocks ImcamRon Insaaamended! inter meats the water qua evens me peorof me sod-gmmrruton.aEdi:umlueamMli:yaWiesptov-sine sMl expached water meets the wabrqualily limibofihussion . .omamiwiov.aMuomgmdim PlumeckanuR (pamdnuedan pack) fly Thareawe Cmude th Gme annual REVISED REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES ESTIMATED i a table ease not Include theme annual apereuonam melmm�aaf mnmema The COST COMPARISON—OVEMLL SITE REMEDY numap,s ,sin enema m epmtlm aM a w w• theim and. n ere bee m eMemm r6r ryy Iof a we yeas and. Ima, cans be wmmel¢m m1 .. wws rw era cow. al M. hem ameem t anath ner.Honeaen me lblba email Anew• ,alien, mews news era M. figumb on,ed o"mt rwnn d mllsarea mall dery Wens alpe news sews alps Mns ap. oave lBe op0retlbn a maintenance g. sews alp• sews alp. sews a.e Ma The aPe mamd mew maaw erM a easommm or m handful voi y� .sv sine xr tafcodgrc newasryiem also tleamp time samma let.oe nammElannes mood hot W a(mteBe ^n damoa eam Eox,For Morelnmmat l^aea a12 tars ,m eaA Nv lava Wm m9pap of the ma mmpMmn bran.emmenaaaW,nmsmamm l eu eanl.uvm Tore en ewY nm. aEa Mmm OvermlSRe Ramsey Papmed wmammrmmlbemwablenam —and Flan l9eare0l99tllgml.mrminmaaehat- a^alemvse9esmenlaeemawr®a® mZal evsamdnhm. waz merlb.amodetflatr®llmeinm/19ne aaandmeepv.m,menwarrsemss xK.aw9rLpnrybl.reearmnam ealmalee caPdae and amen.woeh co m m mart fln mslen r�wlen�m coral o.elrue�wa mean ue M ell me rem,mW mamatYmm Throb mvL Eaabnw.amma Ersm.9braa.e F9 1.l warbeml.ammlbm.erenam abra dew nm ells ore maeva coal sitar- B.mmam .v9 ,amaarawmrem den enema among ins vanoum re maa meelel ttl ame ms°�°one m.,.saes he aa.era fa w cob amen ale.aem nemose real a11e�gYB3 oft em 7asy®waaudes bnW mgenngaaaN4b 1at9aO . rr.mm.a.mbamrl.ma D.o.raxamaalm,ml,mleer. Tire olomil mv®admtenlmeei a .raw,.y.mar Pa'aa men male®ae.nammo u.apse er eeeva wit of me mym Mangm,anee abecnP W �r.�b�1 I��yl..n•ma'e�l.ay.> Non al me mnmafee aaetelned ®dunb ,mrreums W.olab.uW.ula 01 wafaryabaM amseupdmmencmwatbw aaienaarpubmyb remnw lass 'web»mfaaw F.Wew ale mslaEb M ra .af th In(amaom ominpnco head tlelaw(see Ems n Inmrmatlon). What Effect Do These Changes dial afameuvee"hemd.despite thereto commonly area.Ce91'is the only cftera HahrHave On The Agencies' slaw mule mtlmaled,mina and deal _'-matwm ad mined.(Rtr a,lmcifptlnn of the eO n heAft Agenvesl V. - nine pearls end a wmmay analysed vlry Nitre evameem cnlaa Ma omdddl- wneachphaxwadmimammaod Fad ThePrelorre0 enemmihmaemcn6eeln see by me Agencies in analyzing the aw"hidyg. me Commonly GmundwmaammeOwr- mmeaieiaflemanvea Egmalmempnaie AS Mentioned idi me now min& all Remedy Proposal Plena moment me weal,wt of noted M the namwhme m6 putt Menge of Vla estlmared cwa in in. most aaaDle and eaeptable of the come- mead eustahal p moambr yell in the GmmunayGmmlweter Hopmed Plan h smmmmmina9p metal l and reeb tabohlloo.eir on co bugseed on tee med of roammentin m. But Eebed on the l311 of commitment Inane FOR MORE INFORMATION cot mlimmm(-m ro iso ial .,cob emw.ene..e.^,mW mmmaoammnox9.+o ea.^p m..rr ran woos Messes eemmatlwbwema equmm umbmroumw+gai.amarabwtrtme men last wpensevSethechaposmMm. co treemam fora SARI W Meaphef.The 9aa.a.aq.e use w..mwa.rmap..a mtemaual tlari time m me Pt of Me wadaa— w. mi e^wma•aenr.wa. anemaWe remeim med) men men m ma mew ax�s— 9mammc�uwm Mmaw.a loam wpemive mmmmva The Agenldm' aaaaa—uara..�m me. usasle.'+^aaenmlemmsen recommelMatlon of the prmarrad afama b Mamueu.MOOW asI®m+a.emWY^W mnT a.aeconen that he MMalgad. .mesee.vm.l e.ueenmm.�c.rea aarrma eeneomyDm...m1 Thevvalomlomeendmeaecosom in.Oveuml Pmpmed Plan and leas.this eaeM1aOiYea Waimasmra .1 and do not after the health, cot `= aa ro�wr sah�n1i1'm �ame ,m ml9mntal alST1� me vdric. mmeded amiA9antlm' mcanmanea ®ana�u m.iemnn� ,vie w5 Me. Ilon of the prealmd allbineWe. RA d. Is m1.enb.saae.ameone. ee�ew uncharged, important m nine ma lunhar Bad Vew Wawa® weameauurm e.mmluma wpa arm admog am moodeay m coda u®1 mamas nmsa..n tmr,r y assess me Pme how 9usta es CSPNe10m. 9anuol,Nu'n Met of coma.. aaewwm yiemmmamullae The memafeegmmae- Mannp,ura �r uvuaml baar item finm ami it me PmeMe m deanup nmm,b111M WII eelat me tml4 meredcmm Published by; l TheCaruuvy RMatlons Sel non �areua Toxic Subrmmmabs Control Dominion us 90STPGE Stele DePamnem W HeafN$eMraa 9D 710744 P Strem.P.Q Sw 942732 uumaG Sapanmea CA 9423b7321) wmmesa (916)32482M 41p �. p�p &L 93 FAA-,P/,a STRINGFELLOW UPDATE NEWSLETTER RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE AND ESTABLISH THE FOLLOWING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES: Section 1: Selection of Professional Technical Consultants. In . the selection of a firm or individual professional technical consultant, as defined in Section 2, it is recognized that no two individuals or firms have equal training, experience, skill, capabilities or work loads to meet the demands of any contemplated project. For purposes of this Resolution, "firm" shall mean any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity permitted by law to practice the profession of architecture, engineering, environmental services, land surveying, or construction project management. Evaluation and selection of a consultant firm will include but not be limited to the following: A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional standing, its members being of good moral character, and it shall be prepared to submit references from persons of known repute. B. The principal and other responsible members of the firm must be registered in the State of California, as required by law. `/ 1 C. A principal member of the firm's staff must have at least ten years' recent experience in responsible charge of work of the type involved in the project. D. At least two additional members of the firm Is staff must have at least five years' experience in responsible charge in the field, or fields, required by the project. E. The firm shall be capable of performing the work within the prescribed time limitations considering the current and planned work loads of the firm. F. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be given to a local based firm when more than one firm is being considered. G. A firm selected must certify to having an affirmative action employment program. Section 2: Definition of Professional Technical Consultants. A. Professional Technical Consultants are those individuals or firms providing engineering, architectural, environmental or land surveying services which are those professional services associated with research, development, design and construction, alteration, or repair of real property, as well as incidental services that members of these professions and those in their employ may logically or justifiably perform, including studies, investigations, surveys, evaluations, consultations, planning, programming, conceptual designs, plans and specifications, cost estimates, inspections, shop drawing reviews, sample recommendations, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, and other related services. Services for product testing are excluded. B. Services covered hereunder include architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, construction management and related services. . C. A Professional Technical Consultant is an individual, partnership or corporation (or any combination thereof) engaged to provide services as described in Section 2.A. Section 3 : Scone of the Protect. A. For every project approved by the Board(s) and for which outside services are required, the District staff shall develop a comprehensive scope of work. 2 `a B. The scope shall define the extent of the services, the time required, and shall develop a maximum fee for the services sought. C. The maximum fee amount shall be kept confidential until a selection has been made, but, along with the scope of work, will be available to any Director upon request. Section 4 : Selection of A Professional Technical Consultant. A. Projects where services are estimated to be less than $25,000.00. 1. Projects where the maximum professional fees are estimated to be less than $25, 000.00 are usually specific, small projects normally requiring specialization in one or two fields of endeavor. 2. Staff shall consider at least three qualified firms and shall select that firm which appears best qualified for the project. 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4.A.2, in the event the proposed work is considered continuation or specialized services as described in Section 5, "Continuation of Services", or Section 6, "Specialized Services", upon written authorization by the General Manager, negotiations may be limited to the sole qualified firm deemed desirable for providing said services. 4 . Negotiations for compensation for the work shall be conducted between the firm and staff members appointed by the General Manager, or their designees. 5. A requisition for acquisition of services shall be forwarded to the purchasing office listing the firms considered, the reasons for choosing the firm selected and shall certify that the negotiated fee for compensation to the firm is reasonable for the services requested and will not result in excess profits for the firm. 6. The purchasing office shall process the requisition in accordance with the purchasing policy established by the Boards of Directors. 7. The evaluation of the firm's qualifications and the fee negotiations will not be made public but will be available to any Director upon request. 3 a . In cases where the aggregate amount of services is expected to exceed $10, 000.00 and a project may be funded through a federal grant program, all applicable provisions of federal law, including but not limited to 40 CPR, 35.937, shall apply to the solicitation of proposals and negotiations for professional technical consultant service. B. Projects where services are estimated at greater than $25, 000. 00. 1. Public Notice. a. Appropriate public notice shall be given by publication of a notice of request for qualifications in professional journals or publications of general circulation. b. The notice shall request written statements of qualification only. C. As an alternative to the notice by publication, the District shall maintain a list of firms previously determined to be qualified based on demonstrated competence and notice of the request for qualifications shall be mailed to those firms who have the capabilities and specialization to qualify for the project. 2. Screening Committee. A Screening Committee comprised of a minimum of three staff members designated by the General Manager shall select at least three firms who appear fully and best qualified, based on demonstrated competence, for the project. 3. Proposals. a. Staff will prepare written requests for proposals setting forth the scope of work and other information necessary for the qualified firm to properly prepare and submit a proposal. Proposals shall be solicited from the three firms deemed most qualified. b. Proposals submitted shall: (1) Acknowledge the scope of the project and extent of the services required. 4 (2) Include a description of the firm's `./ qualifications for performing the proposed work, including a current financial statement evidencing the ability to satisfactorily perform all the items proposed and required. (3) In the case of a proposal for construction management services, each firm shall provide evidence that its personnel that will carry out on-site responsibilities have expertise and experience in construction project design review and evaluation, construction mobilization and supervision, bid evaluation, project scheduling, cost-benefit analysis, claims review and negotiation, and general management and administration of a construction project. (4) Include past performance records of the firm. (5) Demonstrate the firm's capabilities to complete the work within the time allotted. ( 6) Identify the specific key personnel to be assigned to the project. (7) Provide an estimate of the number of hours involved in each aspect of the scope of work for such personnel. (8) Be accompanied by a sealed fee proposal estimate which shall not be opened until the firm is selected as being qualified. Thereafter, it shall be the basis, for procurement negotiations. The form of the fee proposal shall be as described in Section 6(b) and (c) below. (9 ) Contain a conflict of interest disclaimer. ( 10) Provide any other information required to properly evaluate the firm ' s qualifications and familiarity with the types of problems applicable to the project. 5 a . Selection Committee Members. a. Joint Works. (1) The appointed Selection Committee for Boards of Directors and a minimum of one staff member appointed by the General Manager, or their designees. (2) At the discretion of the Joint Chairman, additional Directors may be appointed to the Committee to assist in the consideration of proposals for specific projects. b. Individual Districts. (1) Districts with three-member boards: The Selection Committee of a District with a three-member Board shall be comprised of the Chairman of the District and a minimum of one staff member appointed by the General Manager, or their designees. (2) Districts with more than a three-member Board: The Selection Committee of a District with more than a three-member Board shall be comprised of the Chairman and Chairman Pro Tem of the District and a minimum of one staff member appointed by the General Manager, or their designees. S. Review and selection. a. The Selection Committee shall review each proposal and the qualifications of each firm with due consideration of office location, reputation in the professional community, experience, both generally and specifically on similar-type projects financial standing, number of qualified personnel and their availability for the project, quality of references, work load and other factors relevant to the project being considered. b. The Selection Committee, upon completion of their evaluation of all proposals, shall determine those firms deemed to be fully qualified to provide the services sought by District based on their demonstrated competence and qualifications. 6 C. The Selection Committee, upon making a determination of the fully qualified firms shall open the sealed fee proposal of the qualified firms. The Selection Committee shall thereafter rank the firms considered, in order of desirability, based upon the qualification of each, as described in Paragraph 5a above, together with the estimated fee proposal. 6. Procurement and Negotiation of Agreement. To determine the firm to be selected and the compensation for the services sought, the following procedures will be strictly adhered to: a. The Selection Committee will, at its discretion, invite the firm that is considered to be the best qualified to appear before the Committee. b. The firm shall present, in writing, to the Selection Committee, a proposal for fees associated with the services. The proposal for compensation shall be presented in sufficient detail to enable the Selection Committee to adequately ascertain the level of effort associated with the scope of work and to determine whether the firm has thoroughly identified the efforts associated with the services and thoroughly understands the work required. C. The basis of the fee shall be: Cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum amount, a per diem rate(s) with a maximum amount, or a lump sum (fixed) fee. d. If it is the decision of the Selection Committee to use methods for compensation other than the lump sum or cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum, or the per diem rates with a maximum, justifications for this decision shall be made by the Selection Committee in their recommendation to the Board(s) of Directors for the services. e. The Selection Committee shall review the compensation requested by the firm which shall be compared with the maximum fee as previously established. 7 f. The final negotiated fee, as recommended to the Board(s) of Directors, shall be certified by the Selection Committee as reasonable for the services requested and not resulting in excessive profits for the firm. g. If agreement is not reached, the negotiations should be terminated and similar interviews should then follow with the next-ranked firm. h. All such negotiations shall be on a strictly confidential basis and in no case shall the compensation discussed with one firm be discussed with another. Section 5: Continuation of Services. A. In some instances where a qualified firm has satisfactorily completed one phase in the development of a project and the Board(s) determine that it is in the best interests of the District(s) to retain the same firm for subsequent phases of related work, the Selection Committee may be authorized to proceed directly with negotiations with that firm for the additional work. B. This situation may arise when a firm has completed a feasibility report or a master plan report and the services for said work are satisfactory to the Board(s) and the procedure of examining other firms for subsequent phases is not deemed necessary. C. In the event that satisfactory negotiations for price cannot be concluded under these circumstances, negotiations should be terminated and the provisions set forth hereinabove for selection of a firm would apply. Section 6: Specialized Services. A. In the event that specialized services are -required where it is determined that only one qualified firm can best perform the services for a specific project, the Selection Committee, in the case where the fees are greater than $25,000.00, will report to the Board(s) said findings and request authority to negotiate directly with the particular specialized firm. B. The basis of selection of the specialized firm or individual, along with the negotiated fee, shall be presented to the Board(s) of Directors for consideration. 8 Section 7: Agreement for Services. A. Upon approval by the Board(a) for a negotiated agreement for services, a contract shall be executed in a form approved by the General Counsel. B. The contract shall include: 1. A statement of the scope of the project. 2. The basis and individual elements of the fees. 3. The basis for payment to the firm. 4. The time limits in which the services must be performed. 5. Provisions for fee adjustments should there be changes in the scope of work. 6. If it is determined by the Selection Committee that the Districts may be caused to incur a penalty or liability, or suffer a loss because of the failure of the firm to perform the work within specified time limits, the contract shall include a clause setting forth penalties for such nonperformance or delayed performance, in amounts to be determined by the Committee. 7. For projects exceeding $25,000.00 in fees, the firm may, if determined appropriate by the Selection Committee based on the nature and size of the project, be required to carry errors and omissions insurance coverage in an amount determined by the Selection Committee to be adequate for the project. 8. Any other provisions deemed necessary or desirable. C. Progress payments made to the firm during the time the services are being supplied shall be based on the work completed to date, as recommended by the responsible staff member. Section 8: Conflict of Interest. A. The District(s) maintain a Conflict of Interest Code, pursuant to California Government Code Section 87100 et seq. , which governs the activities and performance of duties of its officers, employees or agents in the conduct of project work, including procurement. `� 9 B. No Director, officer, employee or agent shall solicit or accept rebates, kickbacks, favors or other unlawful consideration from any individual or firm on behalf of any firm that may be potentially selected as a qualified firm to provide professional technical consultant services to the District. Acceptance of food and refreshments of nominal value on infrequent occasions and acceptance of gratuities or gifts shall not be deemed a violation of this provision, provided that if said items exceed $250.00 in value, in a calendar year, the Director, officer, employee or agent may be disqualified from participating in the decision pursuant to Article III of the District's Conflict of Interest Code; and, provided further, that any Director, officer, employee or agent, as a designated employee under the District's Conflict of Interest Code, has reported said gifts on his/her annual Statement of Economic Interest as required by said Code. Any Director, officer, employee or agent and each firm proposing to provide professional technical consultant services shall be bound by the provisions of the District's Code of Ethics presently in force and effect, and specifically but not limited to, Section 7D thereof relating to gifts. C. Any firm seeking selection under these procedures that violates the District(s) Conflict of Interest Code shall be automatically disqualified. Section 9: Effective Dates and Revision Procedure. A. This policy shall become effective on B. This policy may be modified from time to time as necessary to best meet the needs of the District(s) . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held (B30.pj) 10 ` � RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. Ir.r� p FUI:C ND 91TI Je PIST W0VING CAIITAL -ACCESSING DATE 4/D4/9C PAGE I I REPORT NUMBER AF13 r-Uhl V-SAFLI1A7-1LN_IIIS TLli]iOF._DEAU GL-i0UN1.Y_-.__-.___-_.___ CLAIMS PAID n4/l1/90 POSTING OFTC 11/I1I90 x .--LtflRLNLJI➢�_- uEYnne _-AppU", ,-, - _pee rere..nu I P5996 ARP RENT. INC. 3187.5S INSTREIGENT PARTS 105999 AIR PRODUCTS ES C➢EA. $140.36 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 105999 SIR PRODUCTS R CHEMICAL INC. 391 p.36 PACKING MATERIALS 10fitc-I SAFETY SUPPLY AN CA $A 661.19 INSTRUMENT/SAFETY SUPPLIES 106 002 ALLSTATE1NTC INSURANCE CO. 359.2t REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT °_.CfiOG4 ALVARADO lnapr rn_ -_ ��$139.59___.__..__,_-___-eE➢ NDUSERFEE_OVERPAYMENT__.._.....___....... IBA004 ALMAIN MILLS. INC. 5139.22 RRAIND USER CUSS OVERPAYMENT G'3 lOEPOS AMER.. INST. L.A. TECH. CENTCI 3999.59 TRAINING CLASS REGISTRATION ti-L_. .. _..__.._.._--_ __ ovmm� ..ICR7AT ROvC➢ INC. &/OR AMCRICAN SEALS i5N74.11 SEALS/GASKETS V 1061-Rt AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY f329.3t FILM D �ync.ipP _.peer'✓ ....ALESCEMT • r ____S2a3.hT _-_�___-KC.PEtOL USER..FEE-0YEBPAY7ffNi_ 10h910 ANAHEIM MEDICAL SQUARE, $89.01 REFUND USER ME OVERPAYMENT m luc0ll ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $27.65/.15 SEWER REPAIRS •Ln 1111 r.P eunPPaaw ANDS rD m_ 9675.41MEETI G EXPENSE 126 e13 FLARE P. AMDCRSOk f675.21 MEETING ALP PART I""4 AVTH ONT•S "[CH. f NACb IMF. INC 32.E29.80 MECHANICAL PARTS �._.1C6015___--_-AQUATIC BIO -._.-.__-.-. __.139.6L _____...-.._-__ __. TE�I SAM evavICFS__. _- - t'c 601E INU1T iC BIOASSAY f CONSULTING f2.110.CS OCEW SAMPLL 1 OhT•17 ANAT CI SERY ICES. INC. 63.544.71 UNIFORM SERVICE ._._AP IZONAM INSTkUrc -.INSTRUMENT REPPLL-_-_.__..-_ r IGF919 ARIZ WORKS INSTkUMEElT 5544.27 INSTRUMENT REPAIR ]DEn20 APT YOF NS f491.21 FRAMING SERVICES -Iy_106022 OFF ENERGY PRODUCTSR2.64 D USE l N 106023 OFF TRANSPORT PRODUCTS CORP. f1$678.52 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT a 10EDT3 NFM TRANSPORT T DYNAMICS CORP. f6Te.52 REFUND USER P9. ,7e13rTBEXT �_12Ar.PA Eai rnu m3pnee Prevrrr _. .__3152$15G.12GRLLECCOVALM.0.113-BB__-_ ...____. -.__.__. lOF:25 bALLY RETAIL. INC. i15U.GV BACCVP CLAIM n 196F26 tlAllD NOr T-YHIINEY CO. f930.6E EUBLICATION Cf) _11_26 ._E.KTERI SCIENTIFIC .PRODUCTS ._ __$1.246SSU4.71 .. _ _._ .._.._._..._ COB SUPPLIER Pl-0i-l62. P2-S]-_ - . 1U6G29 BLASIU SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS f1.187.71 LAB SUPPLIES 106E29 6LA5IUS ELECTRIC TRUCK, UPC. 381.71 ELECTRIC CART PARTS '_._-1RSL3C__.- . ..- Od1 --- --3 .36 IC6P91 PONLA0 IREEI U 357.62 PUBLICATIONS 2 HOYLC ENGINEERING COR f9B4.C3 ENGINEERING N --SBRV_I.__C_E S I"-,'• BRW SALE_6_6LLGfi _ RAHLETA 106034 BON 9 IERI D➢FSULTIAA 22715. ENGINEERING SERVICES .J--l_9 106➢35 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $1,N16.34 _MOI08 ___.-I0603a _-GARY.1) GREASEEC.____.___._-__-.-__.-___..-1.318.37__ _ .. .. .___.___.._.REICT FUND USSR BFEE OVERPAYMENT - IU33T f . 0 GRkP3C CSMP AkY i19164.45 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ITF13h CFl 5164.15 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ___CAL E LS C5..11-._-_ _i .93 SEnNU 106040 CAL-CHUM SALC S56.7E HRDWARE IU6011 CAL SOUTH EQUIPMENT CO. 3502.SL INSTRUMEN T E¢3E�➢YEBPeYNENT..-_. __... CALIBRATION _--' -..___ ._.._-__.._ ... . ............__-. .. _-. .. Y -- - ---- - _-.. -- -_ - - --- -..._.._ ( ( 1 k, ➢ FUND NO R1RR - JT 01g7 NPPIIIIA CfPITAL FROCESSIN6 DATE 41:'W9• V16E 2 .J -SPORT RUNS" AF43 —LRCLtISANlttti8k_YI STATUSING CITE COUNTY___.___—_..—._.__._._. ' CL 4I ng FAIL N/11/-:: POSTING OAT[ .4/11/9u ]___JTAR0.ANLYO VENDOR _ ANOUNI__._..____________ DESLRLRTIDR._______-. 116142 CALTROL . INC. STI4.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ._- 10604• CALENERGY.TCOMM. our. 106044 CALIF.if. ANDE C NVALE PUN. MOST] 964.58 PUBLECATION IC6^.45 GASP 6PPXDE CONVALESCENT POSE f612.63 BEFUNO USER PEE OVERPAYMENT ._ .__SY6T8N-MODIFMGTION6--.TELEPHONE 1CLO.7 CNTR, FOP ACvAncro roof. Div. it J9Rn + REGISTRATION /C6U4R CENTURY SAFETY INST. B BUT$ . 1352.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES _._f.333.2L BEPUND_USER.HE-OVBRPAYMBNT- - D 106251 CHURCH YE CORP. 310.358.P' SEVER BEUIB S5-37-1 ERVICES 106C51 CHURCH CN 016[EPIN6. INC. 31.312.51 ENGINEERING 588VICEE 7-13 Fri l06"52 _. rn_r_c_ _ rn�. .x•- ___._-____. PONEpPAR_________ ..__. Z 106154 CONNELL G.M.CRPARTS / OF CALIF 121.347.63$1641 PUMP PARTS ➢ 106P54 CONSELR G. PARTS / DIY. 316.0 TRUCK PUTS .___..le6455_- CONTINENTAL+CHEPICAICLL-DJ.SIf_—___—__ ._ S5,912.T1-. -. .-_-- CHIDRINE SUPPLt-1 106056 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS [0 f5.912.P1 BLUEPINB M.0.10-II-87 IT1 I..... CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 34.140.75 RLEC RIC 9 C_3 .n-RRR ROSS C K. INC. —. _,_$953..63-__._._. ELECTRIC PAIRSSUPPLIES -------- -_ TS 10605- BOSS COON. INC. f95J.F3 BLOWER REPAIRS ------ �p 1P6r66 COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC. SLIISJ T9.P5 ENGINES 11.0.5-13-87.6-848. J-19A —SG3061— rouer"HOLES"' 11EL111—.—_—__ __L663.:;..._-____-____.._--g1,B6IRIG I II60E2 RYHY SHIRTS. CRAPNELL 3357.93 BROCHURE SERVICES ➢ 106C63 CRAZY SHIRTS. INC 12.552.04 BEFORE) USER PEE OV611PAYMENT Y--1CW6A CALe.RJIItlOOY-1113 kI.— --12�S16.75__.___— — RENTAL EQUIPMENT)-T-6- - f— 1f6f•65 CAL Vq CR $136.T5 RENTAL EQUIPMENT -�------------ - 1.16066 LARRY CORTI TRUCK a EOUIYRCNT $22,040-1 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.4-I3-88 •._d —1• 61- •-. lE]LEM —_.__— ..__._._y265.. ----S -REGI6IRATIOE___.__ ._ _ _ __ —{ I2 6066 CHPLDYPENT DEVELOPMENT DEFT f5 Q66.9l STATE O INSUILITICE 106069 CA EMPLOYMENT OEVELOPMFNT i334.C9 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT :..�— lGte7 � -DANIFLS1ESIARCRv.rr $736.8A_-______. ("l 15f OTl OAT4PP0 RCOCAPCH CORP. fl38 JR PUBLICATION IC6072 OC ARTA COPEORATION $4.573.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _.. 1__Ims?v— 1C'6P74 DIC.SOMS S133.86 ELECTRIC PARTS 306075 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $1.997.72 PRINTING 156636-- nLSLIA, rmnPMENI_CARE—__.____—___..SSAS.CO_ SLRVIC8INTENANNT--_ __ 1P6CT7 DD6AD6 ENTERPRISES.ACHM INC. 125.723.64 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIR$ 106E TP DUN.EL Don$, MACH MOVING 3900.14 ¢NCINE UNLOADING COSTS STRAH. INN.._ _...._. . _.__..388.79 OFFIANICALP 106081 EL TOP IT INC. $2$766.35 RAPINE SUPPLIES 146081 EL TRP1T0 GRILL 1545-t5 REFUND PEER FEE OVERPAY!@![ 3060RR --___ _.JEFF DNNEN U L_flE3OU8[[. ASSOC­.._-__.__. _- -1645.CC ._._ -_.- _____ -MILEAGPPLI¢5---- 1E60P3 JIFF EEx si?I.!6 MILEAGE 1661 Pi "R FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. I121.N" HARDWARE FEDEALEAL.ESSTF.L..._ —__. ___ __- _.. 13.9].S.5, AIR FRUCIIOM.SERVICES.J-]-6. J-20 146086 FEDERAL EYFPESS CORP.CON f5T.5: AIR PR¢tGXT 1260P] FERN ELL 4AS 345.-U PROPANE D N 9 FUND NO 91-9 - JT LIST WORMING CAPITAL FPOCESSING DATE 4/04/96' PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 .._._COUNTY COUNTY----__- x CLAIMS PAID '.A/Il/9G POSTING DATE 19/11/90 I060BM FICO•S APPLIANCE SERVICE $70.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ._...-1364X80----p4F4N-GENER.A.T.ION-SY4LTCNS-. _. _ ... .. . ._..____.....36S..Lb -....___....__.._BOPTNAP3._.__._.... ..... ..._... ..._ ... .., .. _.... 106090 FILTER SUPOLY CO. SSOS.97 FILTERS 1060^1 FISCHER f PORTER CO. fIC390.0 CHLORINATION PARTS _-__LAS 9UPP1,188-.__...__ _... ... -. . .._.._. 1061.93 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 643.30 FILM 1960.94 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $6,125.44 WATER USRAGE - 1O6L95----3NE-FORU0N0-00 . .11C9 I4S------- -- D 139016 GAS RESTAURANT SVCS fb.737.86 REPORT USER FEE OVERPAYMENT m 106097 GARDEN GROVE PROF. BLDG. f196.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT [Tf-iG60S8 -i A7Ei g18GnOL4.i--IMiIaLLC 0.8-._. __... __ •300.?O FIBERGLASS_____..-_....._ .... .... ._... . Z 106099 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,693.61 TELEPHONE SERVICES O I0616J GEORGE LEECH 3 ASSOCIATES $166.41 SWITCH n--.-10630]--._..-GEWXAROT-RS•-ANE.-_-_ .... .... . ..._.... .-__.SS99.41.._....-_...___...._.-.[NST0.UM6NT PART..._.-__... 106102 GICRLICH-MITCHELL. INC. i18H56.34 MECHANICAL PARTS -4 106103 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $509.15 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 3---14A.IA DN-GAEEK-4 RES 88-77 .. ..._ . .. .. ...._ .. I9AI05 HACH COMPANY $34.19 LAB SUPPLIES I76196 MARCO CORPORATION S6.375.T9 MECHANICAL PARTS LA-- 44440] _..-MATCN-L.K4A,K. PART-_..----.....__. _ 1061-8 MICHAEL HEIN2 $271.88 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE IObIO9 hEVLETT PACKARD COMPANY $304.00 REGISTRATION 3 _. LCAL13 SA2-7.2i- COMPRESSOR PARTS __. .__ . ..... f- 1-16112 HOUSE OF BATTERIES SSSO.49 BATTERIES f- 146114 R.S. OR-HUNT IEST INC. fl.it9.tlt -WATER 11611b ��-- -----HUNT INGTONNPEACH CO. Ch ----- 3270.0G----------- --REFUND USER FEE - - THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 179.02 RUBBER USER FEE OVERPAYMENT N 196115 RUNT ING iON BEACH RURNFR ST0.N1+ f196.59 RUBBER STAMPS .._ .-_ 2.10.--------1.3611 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 3AI,19 .11 -- ---FEERRRIC LR6L8OaRiID6EE H.O.11-Y0 M8 8-N8T 9 n 1O6II8 14CUST0.1iL THREADED VPUO/CT" 4689.11 CONNECTORS - --- - ' -1_...-10MPIR..._.____..__ ._....... N 106122 INLAND RANCH WATEEQUIR MENTDISTRICT CO. f1.$20.53 EQUIPWATER HST RENTAL 106171 IR VINE RANCH VATFP DISiF ICT 310.53 WATER USRAG¢ ._Ilf11 2221 JEEN S EN TOOLS N9 ALL AG I3C.AT RS .6S31 6291..&17 ------VFACUUM BAGS 1CR1TR JOYfF OfFiCi PRODUCTS f946.9 S UFPLISS _ - OFFICE SUPPLIES ......106126.-_-.. BEARINGS SUPPLY FITTINGS 106127 KAMER COMPANY A SUopLY f920.R5 FITTINGS 106128 ELLEP COMPANY 11.690.I5 1Y10L8/RARDWARE -106128..._.___ ....ELEER-EUU IPMENT CORP.. ._ _..._323.5ML.lA......_..-._ ....._. ......_.INSTRUME-CAPT3.__ . l061t9 NAY-NAY. INC. f695.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS 19613U THE N[1 TM COMPANIES 11.314.6t ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-0SIJfi ING OEARYEGS. -NHL.__.... .. . .. _ ...-.11.313.36-._._..__....._-BNCIABIRINCSRRVICE4- ._. . .. ... . 106133 KING INDUSTRIAL INC. 117.586.18 TOOLS ICAL PARTS 106IS3 MN OR p:OUSTP7AL SUPPLIES SM.17 WOOLS ' a ...... . .........._.._. . __ _._.. .. _ .._ _.._ _._ _ . • FUND KO 9199 JT GIST YOPNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE A/04/9; PAGE A I REPORT NUMBER AP43 ._CCU MTV.SAN IT At I CN_01 SLR1CTS_.DP OR.LNG[..00OYIY ` CLAIPS PAID I4/I1/96 POSTING DATE 54/11/90 ..__YAflBANi11O.____...___JtEPO00.._.__.__..____._.___.._J51UNL_._.____---____�fSLBSP_L111PL-___-._._.. . 196134 EASTMAN KODAK CO. $09.42 LAB SUPPLIES __1^a1 SS _�SASS1lL6Ofi➢1LP..3R_--_._._._.__.. .._._._.._ S2.rR1 "-_.-------__-CONSTRUCSION SERVICES-16- -1 le..__ 10613 L.A. LIQUID MANGLING SVS TE US . PUMP PARTS 106I37 LA YUIlIiA MOTOR INN $212 f212.3737 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT Ab SAFE_[SBUTASIL _.. _ _. _..._. .140.Si.-__.__-____ SAFETY LEE-0VERPAYM¢NT .. . __ .. 106I39 LAN SAFETY SUPPLY CO. f1A0.A6 SAFETY SUPPLIES 3C61AL' H.W. La YMPSTEN t CO., INC. fer162.38 SOIL TESTING -.__19618L__.__._ LEARN KCflP9fl6I1Wl___..___ ._ __ 34.23..-.____-_- BRAINING Mh n 1U61A2 LEARN FCY ,216.47 TRAINING MANUALS 6-! 1061"-.LINT LE NOT CRABOARL 6 ASSOC. f2 Rl6rA7 OEOT¢CNNICpL INSPECTION fiL_1D61R1 .IANIYORGU.L.CGER __.__._.._ _ ._..______ ,753.53__..___. -._-➢EWER ICBETEI.. C 1Y6195 OW IO L. TCSLORA)f ONIU INJ. f6Ii51.E0 REFUND REAPERS D 1J6146 LG[ AL A4I T43 fCOAb 6A S^ f936•.? -JANITORIAL. USER FEE SUPPLIES _. _.1DE197._-__.__.A.J..APPLIE_[0•._... __. _ _.- ._ . ._.__1911.2i_ ___________.__JANITORIALORING PS 106149 NUS NUCLEAR INC.YIR ORMERTPL 5915.00 OCEAN MONITORING 1061S. NUS NUCLEAR I f355.99 LAB SUPPLIES s l90i _161 _ .__ __1215.19__ _. _ IA _ CC.. 3 116151 MACNTED . MAINTENANCE CONTRACT I16152 PAINTEYANOE PPOSU INC. $559.52 POLYURETHANE 6 _MAR YiSUP" V LUMBING-2MIS 116254 MARSHALL MT . PPODUCiIOHS f55.00 TRAINING VIDEOS 306155 MARVAC ELECTRONICS .. 1A7.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES _._1 �6156_-_-__11AII_tG3...1NC.________. . . _.._ 6. 3.7A_._.___._.--_..._._ELECTRIC_SUPPLIPS__._.. r 166157 CENA EN ANGP. 8 C9VIP. 52.30303.50 PACKING MATERIALS I9 "CLEAN CLCAN Nt0Y1'ST t/r549.0P AIR CONDtTION¢R 1"16U P.S. MEANS CO., INC. 1774.65 PUBLICATION 106i61 TMOMAS P. MELT6N f151.26 NILBACB -ICEGS6EMFG. CICB..-_.__._... ._ __._._1387.12.._.... ......... UP.FASYS 10AI63 MINE aSA MFG. CORP. SSS7.36 PIPE SUPPLIES f, 1^f I6A MINE SAFETY PPPIiA IuCES CO. S909.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES 106165_____.__MONTEREY CARPETS _ELC[T -------__..f9R.5.Rl.__...._.. ...__.___REFUND USER OVERPAYMENT N 196167 MONTGOME CANFETS ,890.00 R¢PUSU USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 116167 MONTGON ESU LAYDC ATORIES f6r890.U0 LAB LHARSERVICES _.1:6168__._._..__.ONTR07_SUPPLY. CO. ..._.. .. . _____-215.16.__.__. .______.__-SMALL NAPDNARE 1SA169 N9RTON SALT AND/OP L$64.31 SALT I'I117S MUTTON I CZLLUIES. EINC.RVI fAA.31 ECHANICALS PARTS ._. .1i£171_._.__ NATIONAL TRE.3EN.Y I CEE ___ .._220.22_.____-._.__ __CELLULAR_ REMAIN MACS 116173 NATIONAL HEAT TPEPTIN: . 1',C.[ .562.50 RBFUUO USER ME VICEPAYIICNT 30617E NATIONAL PLANT SEUVICE9. I'.C. 33 r562.8Y VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE _1Ob175 NATIONAL SAEETY COUNCIL f225..SY. .__._.___ _._- MBENSNIF.PEES 116176 NEVI SIIEUEY CO. {913.24 INSTRUMENT - - -- 1:161i6 AENAPP ELECTS.' ICS f213.24 ___'REFUND PARER NNCSr Pd. {1r$56.43 __. _. _.__REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 10617E NORDSTROMOOSTPON f56.93 REFUND 09¢R FEE OVERPAYMENT 1S5119 NOPTMYf Si NOTNIP YCL CI I,0. I6 C. f9r 900.t,. MECHANICAL PARTS ' I _ F ' ri FUND NO 9149 - JT DIST WORKING CLPTTAL PROCESSING DATE 5/G4/9V PAGE _ I REGORT UUMUER AP43 ._COUNTY SANII.L.TIOU_DISTRICTS OF GRAUGE_COUNLY CLAIMS PAID 34/11/96 POSTING DATE •4111/9) __N ARRANT Nn_ RENLOP.. eNOUNL—__ rera toIlON.—.___..._.__ 106t8D OFFICE PAVILION/TNTEPIOR FL9. f9059.17 OFFICE FURNITURE J-T-S - AI 116182 THE OEMART COPR 12.338.MP INSTRUMENT PARTS 106183 ORANCE CEASING, INC. 3162.67 BELTS _.—.J.➢618v--_—DIANG[ IOASI n ECTB12_SUPSLt 1W61R5 ORANCE COUNTY AUTO FARTS CS. 1157.44 TRUCK PARTS IO4186 GRANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 478.4.9P REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT —LCIIA? —._.—._11RAXGE._CO00ILY__E n 10618R ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE 328L.27 MECHANICAL PARTS m 106189 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. 3356.86 FITTINGS ITT 1n119n nvvG[u KFRVllr '22.616.IE _--�ReCIAL2YGANGS— ..__—..__._._....___ 106191 COUNTY OF OPANGr $2,953.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES C le-192 C9UETY SANITATIGN CISTKICT $13,226.98 REIMBURSE WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE n-126193—___. 859..35GASKETGS—__ - 106195 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPN $859.]5 BATTERIES m 106195 PACIFIC PARTS 4115.55 BATTERIES 1-619T PACIFIC BELLay�$24�90 TELEPHONE SUSS---_---__.____._ ._.--.. 3— IL619A PACIFIC BELL f29.90 CELLULAR SERVICES CL 1:619P nL CYEL CEL WEIL 15R.L' CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES lO IC6J 9-20C P_ATHFING[11ENSTRUMENNRANY__—__-__ _.._ ._Z267ELECTRSBOB..PAR35 2362O1 PHOTON kOSO INSTRUMENTS 126T.35 ELECTRICAL PARTS 1062➢1 PHOTO R BOUND CO. f325.G-R REPAIRS n__.�162O2 -__--_PLASTIC .INDUSTRIES ._.____... _ __._—__3YT.%141.i1_._—--__._ PLASG89EMOVAL-M.0.5-it-BB .. f— 1"e6203 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES ,657.19 PLASTERS f 10620R POLYPUAE. INC. 419,65T.39 POLYMERS M.0.8-9-89,1-10-90 11621i—__.__._PORCH SPECIALISTS. Y_C0.__._ __.. _ __.—. _1146.12..___ _. . __.._ -_ .--FREIGHIC SUPPLI85- 106206 HAROL SPECIALISTS. INC. f56.93 FREIGHT -1 106207 MLROLD REIMPOSE ICE f72.00 ICB A_-1062L0--. _-TXE_FRGELECT SOL UTS➢N. CO.___-_ S4.T1T..0➢.—.._.__ -_.- __---183T8101ENTATIOR-INBPBCTIONX.O.B-10-88 -- 1U625R A.L.M. ELECTRIC YOTONS 45.NTT.3R ELECTRIC MOTOR ['l 2�6219"A", xA1kg0Y OIST•OSLL CO. t959.99 TRASH REMOVAL 10621.L.__..__.RECI O—INC.___....... _ ._.... _ _—_3]9a$39.YL..___..._ .. ._. . —_LAG SUPPLIER 11.O.5-11-88 - 106213 PEOTHE EXPRESS TER 14..00 LAB SUPPLIAD 106213 THE REGISTER fL155.5P NOTIC83 6 ADS __ .. 1G621 -- —REND TE.IIETER_RES[TTI NL SYSTEM $2,435.00RUM _.__...._._.... _ 1O6216 IH[ NEPUPL If. SUPL LY CO. f2,533.T8 LEGAL PARES/FITTINGS 1G6236 J. A.-ROR YAT SON 4 LCd SHOW 4IJ.LST.a2 LEGAL SERVICES SERVICES ___306212.__—__ _R OSEMONT ANALYTICAL iCP'._ _ . .. __.33 G1.799.2J _. _. ._____ELECTRICTIW SERVICES J-20- - - - 1L621B ROYAL WHOLESALE LESALE E f2$692.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106219 ROYAL YNOLESACO ELECTRIC 1692.66 ELECTBIC SUPPLIES _. _1➢6220_____ .... ..SAFETY ANA EN_CTRICPP. __—_. .110:1265 5D.. _. _. . . ELECTRIC PART.__. 116221 SENTA ANT ELECTRIC MOTOPc 14.119.56 ELECTRIC PART 19L221 Sµ COAST UESIGNS 45-130.50 OFFICE EQUIPMENT _.106223—_.. . __ _SELY_OF.ROEBUCK KCN _ .. . ___.__ _369.95 .. . ....... ... ......._ HATER USEACB_.__ - 106225 SEARS. ROEBUCK A CO. .600.74 TOOLS 106225 SE AYF OCX SUPPLY i1.60B.T5 WRDNARE I 11T - R t n � FUND PC RIMS - JT DI^T NOPKIN6 CAPITOL PROCESSING DATE 4104/9; PAGE 6 � REPORT (:UMBER AP43 ��_._..__.___—_____ _..---_._000N.TY-SAN17 AT16N-01SiB1CIiBE..ORJh GC. COUN.TT ...._._.......___-.._.....__.._. ' CLAIMS PAID 09/11/9b POSTING ORiF 09/11/94 . ......_YARRAN.T NO.-...... LYODR -- INDENT 19 E226 SILVER SPRINGS LATER f3.131.4P REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT __561.0. ___ __.- SLID89..—___._._.....__._._.___...............___.. 1D6228 SYITh-EMERY CO. 3599.0: SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 106729 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY S289•bL APPLICATION FEES LOASI_A4L.JIDALI3Y—._____...__.__...__S]50.1. . . __............__APPLICATION-P686-__. ._.__._............ ... .._. _......_ IIIA231 30. C06ST AIR DUALITY i1.95J.90 APPLICATION FREE 106232 $0. C045T AIR QUALITY 3225.0^ PUBLICATIONS •n•233--SJUL•_L.DODGE_ ._.__.____... ._.__._. _SS).75 .._.___.....TRUCK TARTS.___._.._ _._.___._. 3� 106234 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. 66.793.36 POWER hT I06735 30• CALIF. ED190N CO. t6.721.0!' PON80. POLE R¢LOCATIOp ..=—IC4236--...._ en_ ..• - eA5_Cfl.-__._ p ___—_.__4 .6 . 1063 WCSTLLLOY INC. $1. 45.74 TNOAOTULRSAM4EL6DAISN-G SUPPLIES D 106230 PPEEOE SP[[UOM[TCP $75.74 DRIVER .._.-.._.___.___....__._.. TESTING IJ4106940 0 MARK N.OL1_SURP:.LY-LQ.....___._—.—_ $116.R7. . IQ6241 STERLING IN gACINNAMDER 1$36.72 BACKUP CLAIM 176291 S LS"IMO ART i36•I2 GRAPHIC SUPPLI83 a..$_1062A2---SUCi4T7"CE 10lP47 SUYNIT bT C[L 92.SM17.27 STEEL 1067H SUPLLCO. INC. l218.PP LAB SUPPLIES JANITORIAL-SUPPLIES._----- --- _.____..._..__.. . I 10A246 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. 9129256,14 TOOLS b 106247 TAGGIN. WAGGON MOBILHOME PARK 5106.72 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT —1S124L--.—LA ILOLaDUND __.___ '1+..38.._._.______-____-T¢UCCR-PARTS--_-_._____. f- IP6249 THORPE INSULATION $90.05 BUILDING MATERIAL 116250 TIME MOTION TOOLS 133.51 SMALL TOOLS " 1062.2 707AL3_REVENTION SYSTEY.IGC--_._._.._. 1464.60.-...._ _ _.._.___..._. .__....._.__ .. N 106253 TOTAL PREVENTION SYSTEMS $296.28 ENGINEERING TSRVIC88 PI-27-I l0625S M.G. TRERICE CO. SROb.Tfl ELECTRIC PARTS J.6.ETUCAUTO-SOON. ANC ___....,_.$512.36._._,..__. STR-PARTS f"1 IM6256 TWIN TUCKER 6 SON. INC. .823.60 INSTRUMENT PART 1W6256 TWINING LABORATORIES OF t3.B13.60 SOIL TESTING PAIR 14-89 ".CN. ._1C625T.. .___._.._.JNOSCtlOUNL.INALY LILAL-_._...__...... ......._ ...__.. . .__..1240.11_ .. ... UNLEADED TSOLINE ..__.._.. IG6258 UNOCAL 3$39.14 ELECTRIC GASOLINE ' 106259 UNITED ELECTRIC SUPPLY fS9.19 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES HEALTHCARE R TRASERVICEg-..-.._........_._.. . ..___. . .. ._ _ ' I0C262 VMSUPJ IV MEALY HCNSERVICES $125.06 CDR TRAINING 100267 VMS (VISUAL PONT.T. SYSTEMS)NB1 i5.664.Y5 INSTRUMENT -..._.-106263--___Y.O.L.-TES.IFN4_.___.._._....__.......__.....__..____. ..16.486.O U._._. ....._._..._._...__LAN SUPPLIES C6ST¢R&--. _. 106265 VWP SCIENTIFIC $2.566.46 LAB ND USER 106265 VAUTTONLAMO f2.566.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT !:... _.._ 106266--__. . __VALLES_.INSTRUMENT GROUP ..CO....... _._. . ..._.__._._._._ .._34.124.LS_._._..._...__-__-„ 10A267 VANIAN SYSTEMS NI GROUP $5.235.00 INSTRUMENT UTERD PARTS I06260 VCR ICU SYSTEMS 35.2l5.Ob COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT " 106269- ...__.__. VORTEX INDUSTRIES SUI'.PlY_._..__.._. .._..__... .._...... ..__-995.36......._ . __..._._... _.NOR R.PAIMS.______._... _.__.. _. .......__... 106771 JOHN R. 3NOUSTRIES f995.00 DOOR REPAIR •" 106771 JOHN R. VAD LCS f533•52 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT ��D D FUND NO RP^ JT I.ISI WORKING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATC 4/V4/9_ PACE T M AEPORT NUMBER AP43 -.v -0F ORANGE LGUNT', CLAIMS PAID .4/I1/9W POSTINu DATE .4/I1/9C f ....�MARRaU1TJA0.— •'FROM- _. _AYpUNT—__._ _-__..____-_OLSCAJni10N— IO6272 CARL WARREN S CO. $426.86 INSURANCE CUIMS ADMINISTRAM -0AR9D4r.1NL.— 106274 UESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. S761.0M EQUIPMENT RENTAL 106275 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $18.837.04 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.S-9-89 1AY--NR0FGLiWNN-BOMB ._. _...__._.-- 106277 VEROR CORP. 17,674.22 COPIER LEASES IP627R GEORGE YARDLCY ASSDCIAIFS $564.57 VALVE -_._--.1y 19 YCLRA_L.IMOA­CQIAIT* A{GA-D{bi--.-_—._.__...�7. D IC62R0 EVERETT H. YORK CO. S497.11, ENGINE PARTS ITT106281 RICHARD YOUNG PROD. $534.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES G IN283 !IMPRESSION CORP. $225,000.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 D TOTAt CUINB PAID $ 2,923,910.90 FEI SUMMARY AMOUNT ._ #2- OPE8_FOt no, � I2 PS0. 5.12128.00 • 02 CAP FM:no 2,962.58 - D _a O1S$_PUND —-------- _12J32.91__-__ -� S3 GP FAC FORD _..__ 626.50 05 OPER FUND 735.57 05.CAP PAC1TiN0 Cn F6 OPER FUND 226.00 16 CAP FAC FUND 4.71 y-_17-OP99_POS�. _..- ..____ __�2.596.46 P7 CAP FAC FUND 3.229.94 SI1 OPER FUND 4.319.12 RI) OPER FUND _._.�8.00_._.__ - 814 OPER RUNG 20.53 114 CAP FAC FUND 5.386.40 _....- 1647 OPER FUNFOxe_.-._.____. 2,274.67 1761 OPER FUND 2,274.67 R]614 OPER PUNO 2,0I5.93 CORD _ 4 .55_._---..... ._ - _____.. 2,044,463663.55 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMB INSURANCE FUND 13.922.72 JTDI§'[_WORKING CAPITAL FUND.-.. -212.846.74_--_ .__ - --.._-__-.. S 2.923.910.90 V + R FUND NO 419M - JT DIST WORMING CRFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/I51/9P PAGE 1 M REPORT NUMHER AF43 COUNIY SALITATION OISYAICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .A... ... . ...._ __...__ __.__._.__._.____CLA7M3"FAID'-T4%TJ79T'PO9TTNG-DATE -014725/99"_..- WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION IGF297 ACCESS ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS $138.25 LAB SUPPLIES 106298 GEORGE ADAMS JR. S7.644.15 SAIA PANORAMA UIMB AGREEMENT '._.. .. __.ADVANCE➢-DFFTCE-SEIIV7T.78.--------.__________ATBW;50___.. __.. __.__dPPEClrE0ffiF&N7 _ 106304 STRATA ALLEN 664.26 MILEAGE MUSE 106301 LEASiNO ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATL $1.293.32 AUTOMOBILE LEASES 2----9ATCTY-SUFPCY-AATP7CE___.._...__.___,__----3:'3S'._... $W2FCEE3 106303 AMEMICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY 62,752.62 FILM 106304 AMERITECH f97.75 COPIER LEASE ._3KOFF REPATR$TI .. n 104306 APCO VALVC f PRIMER CORP 3180.08 VALVE ' ET 106307 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.115.55 NOTICES 6 ADS -"70E lOR--�IPPLtTNNC-_ __-._.__._.__.=I.T.7S�P"•.. _-.-. TPNTb'R.1hYTb D 3063C9 APATEX SERVICES. INC. $3.943.35 UNIFORM RENTALS 106310 ARNEL DEYLLOPMENT CG. $535.27 REFUND PUN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT -- "'-'3063I1-'—A'SSOCTSTFD"T:➢NCRETE-PROD.-CSC---"—"-"'—'-"SW59.50 '--'-"--'" BUILDINclaft m 106312 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING f1600C SOIL TESTING .m__306313 ANSI - CORP. OF COASTAL AGENCY f350.00 REGISTRATION ]0E3'IT-�RLT:➢N"DTSPDSAC'3CPVRF"_.___..____..._._.YC22 i135.1.f....-•_.._ -..OR3'F' VA - =88 - iC 106315 P.V. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. 3S.5BC.SL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-162.P2-37 lD 106316 R. DATIMAN ISO 5.^f DEMAND CORP DISTRIBUTION 106310 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2,642.16 LM SUPPLIES Fl n 106319 HOWARD BLEVINS 3203.00 DEFERRED CONE DISTRIBUTION "PLIES 106321 POLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $143.13 RADIATOR REPAIR p IC6322 BON-A-RUES $126.26 TRUCK PARTS "•+'-"" '115323-""' - 90YCCTNGINCCPTN6"'C'ORP---- -""'- "- ' ' ---f41i73O:93' _ "" -_''-"'----'ENOINEeRIHGSER�"aF7=1T— 106324 BRAGS CRANE f RIGGING CO. $762.60 EQUIPMENT Una _ IC6325 GRIN - MAP I S3.225.54 UPUND PUN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT FD 306327 PROVN S CALDWELL CDNSULTING 93.273.R" ENGINEERING SERVICES US 89-45 106328 PUPNE ENGINEERING CP. 31.49R.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 44 '-"106329-"-'_"""SUSH--ANIF"ASSOCIATES C INC': - "'--"'- """'-"-_"" -' 33.472:00- - '--`- '-- - __SURV89INCURVICtTlT-66-77 106330 GARY G. STRECO $2.464.35 PETIT USE RBIMBURSBMENT 106331 BY-PRODUCTS MANAGEMENT. INC. $30,419.24 PEROXIDE CHLORIDE M.0.4-12-89 _ !'SUMMM-SO[UTTO'NS-' - ""'-"""'--"---TSi7RST9T'---- SeRVlte AOREmfENT 216333 CAL-GLASS FOP RESEARCH. INC. 91,111.32 LAB SUPPLIES 106334 CALTROL . INC. $3.154.61 REGULATOR PARTS 10633S`- ----'CAUETUN ENGINEERS- '" " """ " -""'---" -12782B':57---""-'-'"'-' ' "'"'-'ENCINEERHG'SBRVECST=A0 71Cf}{I!0 '- IC6336 CAROLLO-BOYLC.A JOINT VENTURE $1,710.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1-9 206337 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $34,666.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15 ':. _.. 10633R-.._.__.._CASE POWER [ "EQUIPMENT '. ....• _ .___._ .._..._ .._....IS5:10'.__._._._....___..TRUCK PARTS -. 10fi3T9 JOHN CASON 33.667.5F MECHANICAL PMTS 1A6340 CENTCL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTI,9 66.357.13 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 30634E'"'--'--'"CENTRAL'-POTNT SOFTWARE INC': ' " - 933:00 `SUBSCRIPTION-- 106142 CENTURY PAINT f791.28 PAIRS SUPPLIES I� FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19/96 PACT 2 - REPORT NUMREP AF45 N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF O.ANFL COUNTY - CLAIMS oAlO i4/24'i/9O -POSTING DATE .9/I5%9D' ---"- WARRANT KC. VENDOR AMOUNT OCSCRIPTION 106343 CHALLENGE SEARING L ING. $FLY $63.71 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 106344 PENNY CHARTIER $250.A.'-• DEPOSIT REARM_ .._.._- 106345.--._. C H F V kON-'1113.�.�(FrC._. ._.__.... __ ..__ ___ _._$11.532.95 106346 WILLIAM R. CLARKE $610.54 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 106347 C.I.E•S. , CO. , INC. ij.9CL OD NECMANICAL PARTS _ .._._- 106346-'.—.—COMPRTSYOl1—COMP'6NCNTS-OF-CAL IT.___. 326.S14.t9 . . . ._...—.—..-PUMPPARTS --_ 116341 COPPUTER DAIACOM L922.21 PRINTER RIBBONS 136350 COMPUSERVE $21.56 COMPUTER SERVICES _ D_ _..106351-'--._-CONNELL G.1f­. 'P'A0r7-_D IT/..__._ ..__ . .._. .... _.—. f294.79 TRUCK PARTS 106352 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIRT. $7,044.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES T__ 106353 _ CONTAINERULD CHEMICAL DISPOSA 1975.90 _ _ _ TONIC WASTE DISPOSAL _ :2 166354 - -`-'-fON'T INFNT AL GAAPHI L'T---_ _ --" ' - - -----63;4'C6.12 BLUEPRINTING n 106355 CONTROL CAOLES. INC. $44.1P TRUCK PARTS 106356 COOPER INDUSTPIFS, INC. L128,OR3.02 ENGINES M.O. 5-13-67.6-8-89, J-19A 106357 - - "-"COST-A -MESCAUTU"SUPP"L1""'- `- -' --L1i244.49 ---___-___xRDCR P T�- ~T1 f 106358 COUNTY WHOLLSALE ELECTRIC $944.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106359 CMEMPRO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES _ S1,253.9E JANITORIAL SUPPLIES -3.—.107636M_. _CA'ElERER—__—_______. _._._.._. sT35:75 ._.. ..____.WUIPxETREM'TAL .- 206361 LARRY CURTI TRUCK L ESUIFMLNT 125,000.0;• SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.4-13-88 tD 106362 STATE OF CALIF. DEPT. OF SEN. 199.L^ PUBLICATION _ 1D63-63-" _ - '--STATE"OF "CKLIFORNIK--- $160.03 -'*_-_--SEE PROTESSING PEE 106364 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 616C.f0 SEE PROCESSING FAR 3> 106365 STATE OF CALIFORNIA L255.11 DIESEL USE TAX _ l� "---'-ID6366----STSTE'OP'CTLZFwRr—" ----'-- "' ' - ""-'"-""-'— -Li60.La ' " -'"- SRE PROEESS1NE E 106367 DAILY PILOT 643.50 NOTICES 6 ADS IP9368 GANIELF TIRE SERVICE 62,941.PP FIRES 'Q-'" " 106369---'____DANTE-CONSTRUCTION—_--""""_"""" "-- S650.00 CONTRAACY SERVICES - '� 106370 DESKTOP GRAPHICS L DESIGN i36.00 GRAPHICS SUPPLIES 106371 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $573.75 OUTSIDE PRINTING .� 106372' ---GUNNEL-BROS-. HICR POVIMG-"- S-lifiAD.-Ol - -- - ----- - SPACE RENTAL J-IV Y"Y 106373 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 67C2.AR PAT NT SUPPLIES -I IDE374 D•VALS SALES 6357.94 MECMAMICAL PARTS N _ 106375.. ._--_.. ' EIMCO'PPOCESS"EGUTF.'_CU. ._ _. ._ . . . _.__-i44009.08 106376 ENA SERVICCS, INC. 12V,637.97 CONSULTING SERVICES P2-A4 306377 ENSECO-CHL 93.700.00 CCCAM SANPLING _. .10637E ..__. _E A STMLNE-TRC':--..-_- ..__ __ .. ._. _..__ ..__._—.L2 i31'9':9.1_. ._.....-.._.._ _-OFFICE-SUPPLY@ _- 106379 ECOANALYSIS. INC. $2,414.17 OCEAN MONITORING 10"83 ECOSYSTEMS L641NELPINf L AAAL, 17.750,0"• OCEAN RESEARCH 1063BT ' -- - ' ENG7NEER$'SAEESSSFRVTCC'CO. '"'-"'-"'--' $5190T2-"" " " ""` PUMP PARTS 106382 FNVIFONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. 3454.110 WB SANPLES 106303 MARSHALL FATRRES $350.0F GUESSED COMP DISTRIBUTION ."JOHN-E2"FALKENSTETWA.G -' 43"07:1C- " - ' ---CONSTRUCTIOITSERVICES7=7=6T-2O---- lOf3E5 EAfR SALES R SCRVICE L2,332.P9 FILTERS 1.63Rf FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 6293.T0 AIR FREIGHT ,•.____._."I'll. .._-__ _. - FERPELEOLS_____._ ...._ .. . _._..__ .._. ._._._934.43. ".... - ________ .-_PROPANE _ _ 106398 FICO•S APPLIANCE SERVICE $207.12 VACUUM BELT W N FUND NO 91.9 • JT LIST VOPMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4119/9U PAGE 5 ..n REPORT NUMBER AP.3 W CpUWTv SRNITAIION OISIRICT3 OF pp lNlC COUNT• _.A- __ __. ._----_- .—__._ . _..___._... -___CLAIMS PAID-""O.V25T907 -ROWING DATE 14725Y99'-_-_ WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1063R9 MILHACL J. FILCCCIA 6162.63 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 10639E FISCHER t PORTER CO. $2.466.97 FLOW IESER _ .__. IDA 391-"—""--t ISHE"Cl EN T 1FTCt0: ._____ _ . .__ _._ .....___-151U.13 ...-_—TAB3UPPLiEB— IC6392 FLO-SYSTEMS 38.444.55 PUMP PARTS 106393 FLUID COMPONENTS. INC. $9,742.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS ._. ._I 3639R- -_____.f LUt0-I.RNp[tllr.'3TSTEPT- __._____ . _ .._ ...__.--.S 1T6Ti'5.51 - ..- _._-_...POMP 106395 CLIFFORD A. FORKEPT 6669.0. ENGINEERING SERVICES 106396 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 6364.71 _ FILM FVUNTA'T%­VAt6iT'-----"""'---"'-'- --" --- -5850:29 'VATER"D3E1 GDI 106396 FOR ENTCRPRISCS $1.825.01 SAFETY CONSULTANT ITT ICE399 FOXBOR0 CO. V HAS SYSTEMS S69.U1 MACHINE PART y_._. 1064Ct---.__JACK-iPl2HP____.___._._.__._-._. --- 63 - _..____._._. DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF D 106.01 FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS 1299.75 TRUCK PARTS 106402 A.F. FRET 6195.^_C DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION . -•_.. ..106403.".__ ttTT-OP'FUCLtRTOT--_.._.._._ -_.... _...__.._-___.=Si.]^ _. __. .- WATER-U3 HAu 3 106404 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $3.551.36 LUMBER 1664G4 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $5.418.71 FIBERGLASS MGM -.---"-I'DE9tl6-'—Gf.NCPAT'M01T.T'-PKItTS"E-SORT...CMr__._.___.___._—__SS?:T?. . __. _____.__SAl'EITSOPPLTE it 106407 GENERAL TELEPHONE CC, 66.553.37 TELEPHONE LO .06400 GERHARDT•$. INC. 5561.J1 INSTRUMME PARTS 306910 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION 31.201.OP VACU M TRUCK SERVICES bb 106411 DON GREEK t ASSOCIATES 3A.597.51' SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-72 r, - _.--LAB SUPPLCRIPEIEPAI 106411 FRED CO PRANY 3151.59 LAB RRPPLI83 tp 3D6aA iREU A. MARCER i1 d94.f3 DEFERRED COMP OISTRIBOTtDN :-""-- -'"10fi9i?----NSRPIMGTON-INpW5TA 1'Kll•[11STIC3'"'--- " "' ""'—T1i9E5.9F _-'-"-'-'-�ALpCYAR7S%FIITRICS-" N 106416 MATCH t KIRK. INC. $1.844.91 MECHANICAL PARTS 146417 HATFIELD DEVELOPMENT CA 31.667.92 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT ("1 lC6.19 MYLES S. HIDASPIRUPA 54.5. MILEAGE EXPENSE N i4692i NIGH VOLTAGE ELECTSIC 1700.P1 ELECTRIC PARTS Itl64T1-'"--- '- HASH YIELD PAKAMI:T INC.._ -"" --"--T225 OP _ - SENCNAR"l(ECISTRATION- —"--- 196422 HOIR.IGE9 C.V.S. CAIIT. . INC. $653.81 COMPRESSOR PARTS 106423 DONALD 0. HONOMICML 3300.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION tT92:T0-_----- -------.._--PDf11HOID"CKKur I06425 HUPIFON HIGH-PEACE 363.9M TRUCK PARTS 101.426 P.S. HUGHCF CO.. INC. $2.9.59 PAINT SUPPLIES 106427-- -`---CITT- PUNTINGTOM-MLAtH"-""' - " """' "' ""'--"-"-'517:96-' "- "--'- ---'VAMt TSEAGE-- --- 106428 HUNTINGTON HEACM RUPEES IIAPL t111.56 RUBBER STAMPS 106429 PUNTINGTON VALLEY SCNWINN CVCL 9101.84 BICYCLE PART& f060C. -_ .._._- TOMCAT'K.'XOPII'-" - -- 399.50. Tn6.31 THERGr STAYICES GYUPM 1129.87 ENGINE PARTS 106432 IMPERIAL rST CHEMICAL 175.299.7L FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.1"B-89 -- 106953- INDUSTM LAC THREADED PRODUCTS'_ ' _-'- ' - - -$642:77 "" -"--'-"_' -EDNNECTORA­ 106.34 INFILCO DEGNEMONT. INC. 347.897.09 BAR SCREENS SPEC B-176 LA _ FUND NO 9159 - JT LIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 4/19/9L PAGE w REPONT NUMBER AP03 ,p COUNTY SANITATION DISTMICTS OF ORANCC COUNTY - ---------'---CLAIMS- PATD-01'/YS/90'"`POSTING DATE 04%2479Q- WARRANT NO. VCNDGR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106435 INGRAM PAPER t2.33J.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES LU6436 THE IRVINC CO. $3.974.41 REFUND PLAN CUM OVER DEPOSIT -------1U613T--.-.-._-'7. NCK'T-CNAIFGC-- '--.---."_--'---3GA5:93 _....._____.__ 19643O GREAT WESTEpN SANITARY BURP, $604.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 106439 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 5549.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES .."--.-iOF rfT—�STC'C'VTFTCF-'PROD➢CTS--__._ ___—_._S62 T.94"__ ..-._..--DTP] 106.41 KCLLEEN'S COMPUTER SUPPLIES 3726.93 OPPICE SUPPLIES 106.42 KAMAN bEARINGS L SUPPLY 136.54 BEARINGS 3. 10fi«4 MAPLES COMPANY $552.21 PAINT f3 _rt1 106445 FLEET EQUIPMENT CORP. $19.653.95 ELECTRIC CARTS Z -1'OFf06 -RISZLFTTYTKODUCTS—___—_-- _T92:3P _._-_- L7 106447 RAY-RAY. INC. 3N54.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS '1- Y 306.4E KEIIH-STEVCNS. INC. 33,077.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES __%IiDi1.02". .-.' ---_-7UtLFINE'SOPPLIES — �! 106450 DONALD C. KINNEY $146.97 DEFERRED COMB DISTRIBUTION s m 106451 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUFPLILS 1150.47 GAUGE m"TOF45F---TVC-RORZiT .--_. - {906"."I r.._. __. 306453 MARTIN WOFDICR. SP 32.136.31 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-IR LEI 1Of454 FORNLAND EUILD106 SR37.Sf REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT 106455-"__.. _._._.-LI-COLT NA"TFCCL EA'-DC V: CO.""""""""-""'" '----"'- '-546.96 "'"------ REFDBITI rCHECK-OVER OEFOSII 106456 LEIGHTON L ASSOC. $9.271.B1 LAB SERVICES F, 106459 LE ROY CRANDALL A ASSOC. $3.632.59 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES _1 _...__ .7 0G'fSp--._..-CTEP.LRTCURPUR'Rt01:"--_.__.._... ___.-._ ST.Tv �DP ' F- 106450 LIMITOPOUE CORP. 3E.660.3P ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106460 N.G. LINDSTROM, INC. 34.'96.23 CONSULTING SERVICES - MASTER PLAN JOHN-L"C"UMPSi PARTS--'--- ';; VI 206462 LOCAL AGENCY 51.500.00 LAM PEE 1 106463 LOCAL AGENCY 5750.09 LAFCO PEE - -'-"106469 ('1 IOf 465 MPS $44.41 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES ]. 106466 MAJOR LOCK SUPPLY 3399.5C SAFETY SUPPLIES NAPTNE- VAEVC-SUPFL.1�-_______.-___..__._..gr,7 e]3______..__ „ 106468 MARSHALL MAINT. PRODUCTIObS $191.00 INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOS 106469 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 611.22 INSTRUDENt SUPPLIES 106970­TATT_CN[OA-�TNT--... --SST..6T ---ZRL0RIRATIGP'PARTS — 206471 MCKENNA CASA. A CQUIP. $2,044.93 FREIGHT 10f472 MCMASTLR-CARP SUPPLY CO. 31.413.64 DAMAGE ..,__-.. 106473-'_......._ ._NTCROASt.-COMPUTER- _. . .._.__ - ------ _... . .. _ ". ."_.. . COMPUTER'S PLIES.- 10f474 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. 32P3.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 106475 MOTOROLA. INC. 5669.30 PAGERS ___—_.000L9GA_TIT.EPROIIE_SERVICES - 106477 NATIONAL LUMBER t554.64 HARDWARE/LUMBER 1PM 7N NAl10NAL PLANT SLPVICLS. IOC. 31099.09 GENERAL INSPECTION 106479--"""""'-NOTION'LL-TCLnN1CRL' INFORMATION -'- ------" "_ ' - 1117.5C - ' ""- -- -"-""'-----PUBLICATIONS-- - ---- 106480 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $9.700.63 PANELING ML .. r 4 C W f FUND NU 41 en Ji LIST WUNMIML G(1TAl P00CC55IN( DATE 4/19/9' PAGE 5 COUNTY NUMHFR 4H3 N CO SP IIIIATION 013TTI III UATEE COUNTY CLAT .. . ._ _ .. _ .._.._...___.. __.._............. __....._._____,.._. . CLAIMS PA7 C"34725/90 POSTING "-"PO STIhG DATE 04/PS/90......._""--"'--- .. WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 186481 NCAL SUPPLY CO. 381.6L HARDWARE IV6482 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH S4.0P WATER USEAGE _ _ ...ITS483 ._.___.._.CHAR'LEF`N TCXOE9--...-._.. .. .. . .. .............._._..5.10:OL "-. MEETING EIIPENSE 106464 ERIC NIEMUES 32.484.12 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 106485 M.C. NOTTINGHAM CO. INC. $690.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES - PUMPING -.._...."... IDE48F.._.____NOIIFTT-STTCL T'._9--SUPT'LT" OTINC .. .. .. __.... .---$93.75.. _. ..___ .._STEEL ---- 106407 O.M.S./SDLAG DISPOSAL CO f1.872.0f TRASH BIN RE(OVAL 106408 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $243.94 SAFETY CLASSES '.._. .__ 106489"_"__.._. . OFFICIAL ATREINE GVTOES_..... . . .... " .. ... ."._-_.f 1G6.04 .. . ._ ._.. SUBBCRIPTION___.".______.-___. n 106496 DR SYSTEMS CO. 628.379.17 CHLORINE N.0.2-14-90 106491 CYNTHIA OPNEIL 330d1: MILEAGE EEPERSE .. Z 1JR 492"...._.__ ._. ROFCCT-J:._CDTCT __.. .__..__... .. ... . . .-_137I.A. ...__ ._ �ETIMC-EBPBNEE nC IA6493 ORANGE. BEARING. INC. $295.55 FITTINGS 10(494 PRANGE COAST CLCCTP IC SUPPLY 3147.7E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES '106195-'-""' -' ORANGE COUNTY AUTO"PARTS' CO'. " "' -""""-`3l5.5P -- _ -- " TRUCN y 106496 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE S451.02 ROAD STRIPING Fv1 106497 ORANGE VALVE 3 FITTING CO. 3514.83 FITTINGS :-- OTVGEN-SEPVTCE—.-__.__". A3i3P5.35_ # 106449 COUNTY OF ORANGE 54.875.03 WASTE HAULER COTS FEES w 1065C0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $6,155.17 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION "'-----106501"'----'-""COUNTY SANI7ATTDR'CTS78IGT ' "" "-'-""`35'S I18:17' ""' _ REINBUmif w6kkm COMP-INSURANCE - 106502 PC MAGAZINE $61.97 SUBSCRIPTION �a 1 P65P3 PS1 5951.87 INSTRUMENT REPAIR .f..-.'7063OV"--'-'-PAfiFTC-'P1NT8'--"-......__, .. _. ._,........ , ....._..-.'39i?Z2.69'_. ., _ __..... ._._.._.NELHANICAL— Fluff-S-F- 106505 PACIFIC SAFETY EDUIPMCNT CO. 33.666.1E SAFETY SUPPLIES ._C:2 _ 1965M6 PACIFIC DELL $27.53 TELEPHONE PACMFI-"ASSUCl1TES"-------- -- _.. .. .."..._. _.._.S21.155"S "' -- -"-- -'CONSOCTl1IL=PUBE0-Wu-TI7NSUE81 7 Cn 106508 PARTS UNLIMITED 31.624.70 TRUCK PARTS 106509 ROY PENnEAGNAFT S445.EP DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ._ 106510..._ .._...... PHOTO-I--SOUNO-CC.- .-..._._., . . ..__ __. _... .SIT.7fl. . .. . .. ..... PkOJECTOR REEATII----- (-Y 106511 PICV61CK PAPER 1261.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES -"I IV6Sl2 AIMA GNP. SYSTEMS. P'C, S44.034.16 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 (n 1P6523"" ` - P17HEY Routs ...115P.SR POSTAGE METER REMl'AL: 1PE514 POLYPOPE. INC. $23.467.18 POLYMERS M.O.1-10-90.8-9-89 106515 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $982.76 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106516-.__.__.. MARPLTF PR TMROSC TCC"....' . . ... ...._._.._..__'S IZ1':G1_......_. _ IOE.__._.______-- .-. 106517 PPOCESS LOUIPMEMT CO-PINY 21.316.CP SEALS 10651E THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CL. 54.020.0E INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0 6-10-88 ICG519" ,_ _PURLISX . . ..._._ _..AMOS. _. .._ .. .. SUBSCRIPTION 106520 R M CONTROLS $533.43 CHARTS 106521 R.F.M. ELECTRIC MOTORS S2.631.54 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS ICE522" "' _'Pf AL' OSTATE'DEVCLOP-rNT CORP. '-"""` 5391.53 "' REFUND PLAN'CHECK OVER OEPOSYT----'- 166523 PLCYC. INC. SR6.64 i.WP SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 116524 REIN VALVC CO.. INC. 92,361.62 VALVE PARTS 106525 PER MIME SXOFS'"' "' " "" _"'" $080:V9 - SAFETY SXORS------ -- '-- 1D6526 REPUBLIC ENGINES 1146.15 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9111 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL FPOCESSING DATE 4/19/9B FADE 6 REPORT hUMbCR AP43 a) CDUk IV SAAITAIIDN OISTk1CTS OF ONANFL COUNTY ---___..­__ ___._--. __...._ CLAIMS PAID 54/25/90. ..POSTING DATE' e4/2519U_____._ _.- _ WARRANT 40. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106527 THL REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 2116.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ID6528 RFNOLD POWER TRANSMISSION S94.32 MECHANICAL PARTS 106S29'-"_ " ' - RICNAORSr VUTS6N`'A' CEPSHON "' - -'-- "-'- 661000.60 " - -_-' LEGAL SERVICES R.0.6-I1-86 ' -- 106536 ROBERTS 6 SONS COAST. CO. 6484.13 RRPUNG PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT 106531 RODNEY-HUNT CO. $6R7.44 GATE PARTS 106!3R ROYCL-TNSTO'UKENT--"__- 106533 RYAN-NERCO 1272.48 HARDWARE 106534 S.A.F. MACHINERY ENG.. INC. $6:35.63 MECHANICAL PARTS ._.... 206535____..___ SAT'TT"EEEM"CORPT---_. _._ __ . . __.__.. _.-. 3112.90 ._ ._._ __._ PARTS CLEANER _._. D IP6536 SAFFEL 6 MC ADAM $409.20 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT nl 106537 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT.L S25.432.39 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-I4-89 10653E-- -----nACLTFFC-7)CVECOFME6TC0:"' """' -"-'""""' "" "`'--s5J 9:O0 ASITIN P LOCK EU OVER DEPOSIT --- C/ 106539 SHAMROCK SUPPLY A1.J65.26 HARDWARE D 106540 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $0 G.47 ENGINE PARTS 1?6541' `-----STEP R4 CV IRONiENGP.TWf"""'-- -""'--'-" """'" --"-"-12GI6 CJ2 f"'--" " ""'"-"'"--ENGINEERING SeR110ES --1 106542 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 194C.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS M IDb543 SMITH.-EMERY CO. $2.887.S0 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-16-89 .-''t 1F654�__.--01C-A ND"TnlTWO-ENVI NEE Re.-.__.._. _..__.____._5589.n 0._ .. - ...-. SOIL msi'iiid .6.6-14-89 4t 166545 SOUTH COAST DODGE 3245.65 TRUCK PARTS LD 106546 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $341,123.73 POWER ._..__ '1 C6117 ... -.__. _SO. TALI GAS-CR.-_..._-_._... --. 36r91B.36 NATURAL GAS---- --- ID6548 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPOR. CO. 5510.0 EASEMENT AGREEMENT 2-26 D 106549 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $47.25 DRINKING WATER 166556 '--"_'_ "--SPAGEING"TNSTRIINFNT_CO7:TNC: '-"--'-"' - `--" "'A242.3. '--- INSTRUMENT' APA[ IC6551 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFI, P.E. $7.20J.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162.P1-20.P2-37 C 101512 WESTALLOY INC. $2.107.41 WELDING SUPPLIES _ 306553"___._._-�TAR'TOOL-A' SURREY_.[._.___...._...___.. __.___.SIT039:73_. __. _._.... .... ___-.TOOLII--__-___ 106b54 STATER RPOS. MARKETS $6,695.87 REFUND PLAN CNECR OVER DEPOSIT 106555 STERLING ART S76.99 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES 1.6556- --SCOTT-5TEVENS------_- AE74.700 - DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF ('T IC6557 SUNIA. INC. $265.63 PRESENTATION AIDS -1 106ES8 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE L MAIkT. $3.847.04 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.8-9-89 106559-_...._.._.__`SUNSET-FORD'._._........__ _. . .. . . .. .. ._._... -535"5"_.._... ... _.._ _.. TRUCK PARTS_._._ __- 106560 SUPELCO. INC. S833.09 LAB SUPPLIES 106561 CONTINENTAL AIR 7001 . INC. $3.032.32 TOOLS 20E562-___...,-.._ SURVEYOPS"SERVTCE"'CG:__.. _... _.. . . . ___.___.1997764.-_. SAFVY-SUPPLIE 116563 74LIU TIFF. INC. S259.84 TIRES 106564 TAYLDR-DUNN 1799.22 TRUCK PARTS -- 1DE565 TECH N'ICAL PRODUCTS'-1 CTRLS" "- '" - ''1346'.95" "'- '" - - - - INSTRUMENT PARTS-- -- 106566 TEKMAR COMPANY 1932.71 US SUPPLIES 1OE567 THORPE INSULATION 9504.12 BUILDING MATERIALS 706566 "" - 3T FGUTPPEI:T COMPANY" "' " ' - "-- "" 13E1.P.f. '" -" -"------- SAFETY-SIGN'---"-- 106569 TIME HOTIOh TOOLS $65.34 SMALL TOOLS 106570 TINKER L RASOR S2.99.1.38 INSTRUMENT L_._._. ..10657T__._._..._ _TRAVEL TR-AVEL-................ ... __.._._. _ _. ._._._ _. .S1B148TW00 ._- .. _.. .__-_._ TRAVEL SERVICES 106572 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY. INC. 1234.59 TRUCK PARTS CO T ' 4, f FUND h4 of 9P JT ;IIS1 VURMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19/94 PAGE 7 .. COUNTY NWMNEP AP93 V COUNTY SEA I T/TION DISTRICTS Of OP 0IF COUNTY �_... .. .__ _.___..__..._....._..-._._...____ ......._. ... . CL AIMS VYiD...tR"/29'790_'.P0STT NG D/Tf'GT/7S/9R_.-"-•_-'— - WARRANT NO. YCNOON AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 166573 J.G. TUCKER A SON. INC. 51.649.34 INSTRUMENT REPAIR S W6574 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTER.INC. 5577.16 cuss .. . IG65T5'.___..__.__..UNION-31T'A'vow—..._....__.. . . . .. _..._._.. ..........._-.STF229:CC 106576 THE UNISOUMCE CORP. $314.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106577 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3145.P7 PARCEL SERVICES -C . ._._. ._. 1065TF-.---1tT1TAP- CTVRTOR-COMPSSY_._._.. _. ........... ..__.._.-__ 1311.15 _... ._--__._ ABIMICTU=11 _. 10E579 VAR SCIENTIFIC $3.322.11 LAB SUPPLIES IE'65PP VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 59.446.37 FITTINGS 10B5PY"-'—'V kN-EEL UVC N"PTFE-'S'TIR C"'_""' SIF623.1'O'" S12EC-- „G.1 106952 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP $323.09 LAB SUPPLIES .m 106583 YC9TCA SYSTEMS 12.697.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT Z._ ... 106584-._. _.-_-..VTNING-TNOOSTRIAL SUPv1T_. _.... EAFETT"SOPPf:IES- .O 1065A5 VILLAGE NUPSERIE3 S2MF.50 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 'n 10R586 AALIEAS WHOLESALE ELLCINIC 5319.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES . _._.__._1T1'4'.9a ......... . _._. . _.. REFpNDRL7J1"CNECE"OTER'UEP09IT— t,--I 1065PP CARL WARREN L CO. S30O.G0 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR -rn 106509 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $97.50 PUBLICATION 3. -_t0E99D- 'L'PL-C 3"FSRS'P'G V ERO-SCR YTCL....__.. ...__ _..,__._,.._.—._1383:73.. ..-_-..___..COAAO GERYLCm-_ . 106"1 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS. INC. 5332.36 SAFETY SIGN LO 1:6!92 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CS. &1.439.66 RENTAL EQUIPMENT __._..... __-n 9iB84.31" --_.._._. __-.CAUSTIC"900A 11:0:B-T-99 -- -' M 106594 VESTRUA INTERNATIONAL 61.132.57 TRUCK PARTS n 106595 ROURKE E WOODRUFF $39.077.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-4-89 .,� . .._._ t0F!96"-______TCkOfTORY:__..___... .. . .. __... .._._...._-...__....�T;PO _. . ....__._.__-_._....CDPCEFELE ES- 106597 RICHARD B. EDSAP 120U.04 DEFERRED CORP DISTRIBUTION .N TOTAL CLAIMS IAID 64/25/90 51.668.364.2W P� SUMMARY .. .... ... .... . ....- AMOUNT ll N NI . ....... ..... .... . 136.72 . ... .._-.__.._--__s _.. !2 5, .3 13 ,706706.39 YS 1,791.34 Y6 .. _. ......__.....___... _ . .__ .... ..... .. ... . ... ... ...._ __._fi.729.0fi___...... . ...... ..._..,._. __-.__-__ -... 06 _. ... ._ . .._ . 2,473.93 07 34.794.06 17. ...-._._.._.__ .__... . ... . . ... ._... ..47.356.62 . . ._ 011 6,749.59 014 282.787456.16 3 519.63 0667 13.690.44 .:..... Y1614.. . - .... .. ....... . . ... ... _. ......__._.__. 6.387.44........__.._..___._.__..-__ _ JT OPEN FUND 354.973.45 t CORE08 SELF 711.743.17 fA SELF ST WORKING INN CRT, TAL IMSURAM08 POND . . .. .. ... .. _. .. 86,375.5 Z. V JT GIST NORKINC CAPITAL IB6.P5.38 i 1,66E.764.28 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA AO.Box B+27 FONNTAIN VALLEY.[ IFOPMA 9272`' / April 12, 1990 1 B BLUS AVENUE V++Bx .MU UIN vA Y.CAUFOFNIA 9270E-m+2 MEMORANDUM n+m smas+o n+Ai 9sx-zxn To: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager From: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager Re: VIDEO INSPECTION SERVICES FOR DISTRICTS TRUNK SEWERS AND MANHOLES, SPECIFICATION NO. S-045 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, April 3, 1990, for Video Inspection Services for Districts Trunk Sewers and Manholes, for a two-year period beginning May 15, 1990. Tabulation of bids as follows: Houston & National Harris Pipe Plant P.S.S. Inc. Cleaning Services Whittier Riverside Long Beach Item A. Trunk Sewers Size Range: 8 to 60 Inch Average Price $.524/ft $.536/ft $.92/ft Estimated Annual Cost for 25 Miles of Trunk Sewers Inspection $69,168 $70,752 $121,440 B. Manhole Surveys Estimated 100 man- holes per year. Estimated Annual Cost $10,725 $16 ,444 $47 ,713 Annual Estimated Total for Items A 6 B $79,893 $87, 196 $121,917 C. Miscellaneous Charges 1. Sewer Lines - Set-up Charge on Orders less than 1,000 feet $175 $500 $735 n C-1" AGENDA ITEM #10 (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" Page 2 Houston & National Harris Pipe Plant P.S.S. Inc. Cleaning Services Whittier Riverside Long Beach Item 2. Manhole Surveys Set-up charges: $65 $300 $650 For manholes less than: 5 ft 20 ft 20 ft 3. By-Pass Pumping Service as Required $250/hr $350/hr $150/hr It is recommended the award be made to P.S.S. Inc. , the lowest bidder, for a two-year contract for Video Inspection services. The two-year contract period is estimated to cost $159,786 for video inspections based on projected usage, plus $5,000 for Miscellaneous Charges listed as Item "C", for a total of $164,786. Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager We hereby concur with the following recommendation: r r Gb&y Streed, Director f/\off 'Finance l Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering v cc: Rita Brown, Boards Secretary TH:bp "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECISS AVENUE / MUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Tko (2) CONTRACTOR: Gust X. Newberg Construction Co. DATE Mav 9. 1990 JOB: PRIMARY CIARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PI= NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct-) $ 21,371.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the follaving changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as ccupensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - TELEPHONE SERVICE CONDUIT ADDITION The Contractor was directed to provide and install telephone conduit between the Construction Management trailers and the existing Blower Building basement. The service requirements of the telephones added to the Construction Management trailers exceeded the existing capacity of the telephone conduit. The contract specifications did not incorporate the required additional conduit. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO #2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,497.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER PTEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - WEST Ply ROAD MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to add a light pole and relocate the specified camera at the entrance of the West Perimeter Road. The camera was relocated to increase the field of vision and expand mobile capabilities. Additional conduit and wire were required due to the camera relocation. The additional light pole was not shown on the contract plans and was required for safety lighting and camera viewing of the west entrance at night. The raising of the concrete island at the west entrance from 3 inches to 6 inches is also included in this item. The specified island height was increased to conform with typical cub Nights throughout the plant as a traffic safety measure. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH #1 and FCO# 11) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,498.00 TIME Egffi4SION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. 13OX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE fOUNLUN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CON1RA=: Gust E. Newberg Construction Co. DATE MAY 91 1990 JOB: FRDIARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RE[A7ED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33 Item 3 - POT HOIE R.XlSTnG PIPE T The Contractor was directed to pot hole and survey the location of the existing 36-inch Orange County Water Districts (OW) waste water pipe line at the OCSD/OWED property Pule. The contract plans shoe this pipe line to be abandoned. Upon further investigation OLWD has requested to maintain flows in the referenced pipe. The exact location and verification of pipe l;.m material were new for future extra work which will be included in a forttooming change order. All costs included in this change order item and all future change order item associated with CM pipe lines will be paid by OCWD. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference POO i10). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,376.00 TIME EXTSNISICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER TPEM: $ 21,371.00 TIME EXTENISION THIS CHANCE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional cork contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Tim made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date November 2, 1989s Original Contract Time 800 Calendar Days Original Completion Date January 11, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Tim Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 800 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date January 11, 1992 Actual Final Completion Date January 11, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 ^ P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FfT.TC AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE may 91 1990 JOB: PRIMARY CIARTRTR.RS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACII,TFIES AT RECLANfMON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33 Original Contract Price $ 39,657,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 44,925.00 This Change (Add) (D ) $ 21,371.00 Amended Contract Price $ 39,723,296.00 Board Authorization Date: May 91 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMHEMED BY: Construction Manager Date GUST K. NEWBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ACCEPTED BY: AP BY: Contractor Date Director of Engineering Date "D-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3" S COUNTY SANrTATTON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECTTG AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALM EA. 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Three (3) CONTRA=: S.A. HEALY COMPANY DATE Mav 9, 1990 JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 AT RECIAMmrON P= NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-35-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 92,392.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following addition to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 FUDCATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 M OR CAL CENTER (IBC) Thee 'sting Mx panels are located inside the digester pump control room which is a corrosive environment. The electrical equipment malfunction from time to time due to the wet, dirty and corrosive em:ironuent. This area is designated as a Class 1, Division 2 area which requires special equipment to meet the Uniform Fire Code. Therefore, the Contractor wee directed to relocate the existing control center to Power w'i i.ii C, Mx-1a, which has a controlled environment. Added time was allowed the Contractor due to the long lead time involved in obtaining the new electrical control panels. This work was accomplished an a time and mate- rial basis per Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 51,479.00 TIME E )MENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 60 Calendar Days Item 2 REPLACE DEFECTIVE PLUG VALVES The contract documents required two knife valves to be installed between the digester walls and existing plug valves. The existing plug valves were found to be defective and could not be connected to the new piping system. The Contractor was directed to replace the plug valves with ball valves which have flanges compatible with the new piping system. This item was accomplished on a time and materials basis per Section 10-6(b)2B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,800.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELISS AVENUE Ep NnUN VALLEY, [`AMFOannn 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: S.A. HEALY COMPANY DATE Mav 9. 1990 JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-35-1 Item 3 STAINLESS STEEL HOOPS TO HOLD PVC LINER IN PLACE The Contractor was directed to fabricate and install Type 316 stainless steel hoops that would expand against the PVC liner and prevent digester gas from attacking the dare concrete. Seven stainless steel hoops were required. This item was accomplished on a time and material basis per Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,990.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 RELOCATION OF 14-INCH SLUDGE MIXING LIME AROUND DIGESTER NO. 8 The proposed 14-inch sludge mixing line on Digester No. 8 was to be located just above an existing 8-inch primary sludge feed line. The 14-inch ductile iron sludge mixing line requires large heavy duty pipe support brackets. The new pipe supports could not be installed at the location she because of the existing 8- inch primary sludge feed line located below. It was therefore necessary to raise the 14-inch mixing line to a higher position on the exterior digester wall. This required the upper nozzle penetration to be raised to prevent digester gas from being trapped at the high point in the system. This item was accomplished on a time and material basis per Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 11,040.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 CHANGE NEMA 4X CONTROL STATION TO EXPLOSION PROOF BOXES The outdoor mixing pump control areas are designated to be Class 1, Division 2 areas which require explosion proof boxes by the Uniform Fire Code standards. The Contractor was directed to upgrade all control stations at Digesters 7 and 8 . This work was accomplished on a time and materials basis per Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,073.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E 2" AGENDA ITEM #10(c ) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECd.7S AVENUE FOJNPI.IN VALLEY, CAUIPMUA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CONIIWC : S.A. HEAVY CCNTANY DATE May 9, 1990 JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AVID 8 AT REC[AMATICN PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-35-1 Item 6 OUTDOOR LIGHTING FIXTURES IN PEW MIXING AREAS The construction plans dirt not provide for any outdoor lighting in the pomp nu ing areas. Because this area is designated as a hazardous area, the Contractor was was directed to install special lighting fixtures with explosion-proof boxes approved by the Unifom: Fire Caffi to eliminate a tripping hazard and provide a safer work area. This work was aa:cuplished on a time and nnterial basis per Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,635.00 TIME EITENSION THIS CRANE£ CRUM ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 REPAIR AND IUTIACE-04T OF DAMED GRATING The Contractor was directed to repair and replace damaged or missing aluminum sections of grating to provide a safer working area inside the Digester 7 and 8 caitxol room. This item was acccuplished on a time and material basis per Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ACY�D COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,375.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER: $ 92,392.00 TOTAL TIM EXTENSIO] THIS CHANGE ORDER: 60 Calendar Days The additional work curtained within this Change Order can be perfomed incidental to the prime cork and within the time allotted for the original Contract plus the 60 days time extension granted hereby. It is, therefore, m tually agreed that no time extension other than the 60 days approved herein is required for this Change Order and no direct or indirect, incidental or cmsequentia: costs, or expenses have been or will be inn,rred by Contractor. "E-3" AGENDA ITEM k10(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" COUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELi.IS AVENUE �..d TOMBLIN VALLEY, CALLEORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: S.A. HEALY COMPANY DATE may 9, 1990 JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 AT RFPfAMATON PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-35-1 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date April 25, 1989 Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days Original Coupletion Date Decarber 20, 1989 Time Extension this C.O. 60 Calendar Days Total Tins Extension 210 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 450 Calendar Days Revised Completion Due Date July 18, 1990 Original Contract Price $ 2,530,072.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ (210,549.001 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 92,392.00 Amended Contract Price $ 2,411,915.00 Board Authorization Date: May 9, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RPCDMMENDED BY: 1 Construction Manager - Date S. A. HEALY COMPANY ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY: ConU actorw '. .a,�, Date Director of Engineering Date "E-4" AGENDA ITEM #10(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX$127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272"127 a 1O ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 (� FAX(714)98241358 11 April 25, 1990 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Pauntain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendunt No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engine ring Corporation in Connection with Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17 In accordance with the Districts, procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Calnlittee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the design of the Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct costs, subconsultants, and profit, in an amount not to exceed $162,598.00 as follors: Engineering Services, for labor plus Overhead at 155.5%, not to exceed $ 6,438 Direct Costs, not to exceed -0- Sub=mA, tents, not to exceed -0- Profit -0- $ 6,438 Construction Mananwrpnt/Inspection Personnel (hourly rate including labor, overhead and profit) at $80 per hour, nut to exceed $156,160 Total, not to exceed $162,598 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be perfonoBd and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/William IMihonev A. B. Catlin Willaim Mahoney Joint Chairmen Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thcmas M. Dawes Thetas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "F" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) ( 1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F" RESOLUTION NO. 90-41 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ^ AGREEMENT-WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR SIGN JOB NO. J-17 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR DESIGN OF CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17, PROVIDING FOR WAGE ESCALATIONS DUE TO DELAYS IN THE PROJECT PLUS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION SERVICES f t t t t f f f t f t t t t t t f WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 provided for additional engineering services to accommodate proposed change in the location of the site of the laboratory and other design and scope of work changes; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide for wage escalations due to delays in the project plus construction management/inspection services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on April 11, 1990, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated May 9, 1990, to that certain agreement dated August 13, 1986, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 and Boyle Engineering Corporation, for "G-1" AGENDA ITEM T10(d) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-I" design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, providing for wage escalations due to delays in the project plus construction management/inspection services, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $156,160.00 as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $329,105.00 to an amount not to exceed $491,703.00: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum No. 2 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 155.5%. not to exceed $270,960 $ 6,438 $277,418 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 5,000 -0- 5,000 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 12,750 -0- 12,750 Fixed Profit 40,395 -0- 40,395 SUBTOTALS $329,105 $ 6,438 $335,543 Construction Management/ Inspection Services, at hourly rates for labor including overhead and profit ($80/hour) , not to exceed -0- $156,160 $156,160 TOTALS Im.105 $162,598 $491,703 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in farm approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990. "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-42 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM, INC. FOR TECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT SERVI E A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM, INC. FOR TECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT SERVICES RE 1969 COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN EIR AND OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION, PROVIDING FOR REALLOCATION OF COSTS AMONG CATEGORIES WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional Services Agreement with K. P. Linstrom, Inc. for technical and environmental support services relative to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Environmental Impact Report and Ocean Discharge Permit renewal application; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with K. P. Lindstrom Inc. to provide for a reallocation of the costs among the categories within said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated May 9, 1990, to that certain agreement dated October 14, 1987, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 and K. P. Lindstrom, Inc., for technical and environmental support services relative to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Environmental Impact Report and Ocean Discharge Permit renewal application, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, is hereby approved and accepted; and, "H-1" AGENDA ITEM k10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" Section 2. That said reallocation shall be as follows and shall not change the maximum authorized compensation of $304,000.00: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum No. 1 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor, not to exceed $280,000 $(7,000) $273,000 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 24,000 7,000 31,000 TOTALS $304,000 -0- $304,000 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990. "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" COWTy SAN1 mn N DISTRICTS OE' CRANC,E COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ET-1 AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIECI rA 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE Mav 9. 1990 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Pdincer Avenue and Ia:mson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27 Amwmt of this Change Order (Add) (D ) $ 77,778.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Contract No. 2-26-2 Item 1 ADDITIONAL WATER LINE VALVES FOR THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE The Contractor was directed to supply and install four 8-inch butterfly valves for the water line on Taft Street. The City of Garden Grove requested that we have the Contractor install the valves in conjunction with the relocation of the Taft Street water main. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,760.00 TDE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 8-INCH WATER LINE NOT LOCATED AS SHOWN The Contractor encountered an existing 8-inch water line located on the centerline of our proposed 8-inch VCP sewer line. The water line was shown to be 6 feet away from the proposed sewer line. The Contractor was directed to install a temporary water line to provide water service to an apartment conplex while the 8-inch water line was relocated. The 8-inch cater line had to be relocated in order to construct the new 8-inch sewer line. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Prwisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE WIDER ITEM: $ 6,870.00 TIM EXTENSION THIS CHANGE WIDER MEN: 2 Calendar Days "J-1'" AGENDA ITEM a10( j ) - DISTRICT 2 "J-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 � P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 m.ISS AVENUE FaWIAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Six 161 CONPRACI10R: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE Mav 9. 1990 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lamson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27 Item 3 RIIACATE UTILITIES ON NELSON STREET The Contractor was directed to relocate or support various utilities on Nelson Street. Existing power poles, fire hydrants, water meters and gas meters were to be relocated by others due to proposed street widening prior to the construction of our 54-inch RCP sewer line. However, the City did not widen the street or relocate the utilities prior to the sewer line construction. The utilities had to be relocated before the sewer could be carpleted. This item was accarplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 33,004.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days Item 4 WATER I.rwE DELAY An existing 14-inch water line was to be relocated per contract in order to construct the new 54-inch sewer line. The water line located at the intersection of Taft Avenue and Trask Avenue was required to be shut off while the relocation proceeded. The City of Garden Grove could not shut the 14-inch water line off because of a valve malfunction. The Contractor was delayed portions of two days while waiting to proceed with the work. The standby delays are authorized the Contractor pursuant to Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,760.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day Item 5 ADDITIONAL PROJECT SIGNS The Contractor was directed to provide six additional project information signs in an effort to reduce the potential for accidents on the many streets which were affected by the sewer line construction. This item was acca pushed by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,340.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Day, "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #10( J ) - DISTRICT 2 "J-2" COUNTY SnrT=CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FT.T S AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Six (6) CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE May 9, 1990 JOB: Portion of Euclid interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lamson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27 Item 6 WISCLOSE'D SnRT.JTIES The Contractor encountered several undisclosed utilities at various locations while excavating for the new sewer line. The Contractor was directed to investigate and excavate around the undisclosed utilities and to make the necessary repairs. Following is a tabulation of the additional work: Location (Sta. No.) Utility Amount 112+35 4-inch sewer lateral $ 856.00 112+38 Abandoned sewer wet well 1,378.00 10+65 Electrical conduit for traffic signals 805.00 23+70 PACTEL duct bank 17,889.00 24+16 30-inch storm drain 547.00 37+00 30-inch stone drain 1,376.00 40+14 4-inch %ater Line 3,897.00 44+35 30-inch storm drain 1,367.00 45+57 6-inch water line fire service 1,206.00 49+90 6-inch water line fire service 723.00 $ 30,044.00 This item was accomplished by Contractor's force amount pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 30,044.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days "J 3" AGENDA ITEM #10( I ) - DISTRICT 2 "J-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISMICPS OF ORANGE COL= Page 4 of 5 -� P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RUT S AVENUE FOOLPAIN VALLEY, OUaFaUM 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. ND. Six (6) CONPRACIOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE May 9, 1990 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Ianmson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27 TOTAL ADDED CST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 77,778.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 14 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perfosed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time nade by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 14 days' extension of time to pert= the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SLVt4V OF COSIRFLT TIME Original Contract Date March 22, 1989 Original Contract Time 365 Calendar Days Original Ccupletion Date March 22, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 14 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 61 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 426 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date May 22, 1990 Actual Final Caquletion Date Not applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not applicable Original Contract Price $ 9,242,538.00 Prev. Aith. Changes $ 415,409.00 This Change (Add) (SadusC) $ 77,778.00 Amended Contract Price S 9,735,725.00 `a✓ "J-4" AGENDA ITEM #10( j ) - DISTRICT 2 "J-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE EYIDNPAIN VALLEY, CALUF RNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE Nay 9, 1990 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Iamson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27 Board Authorization Date: May 9, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIEOPNIA FWROENDED BY: cautruction Manager Date W. B. ESERT CORP. ACCBPTE BY: APPROVED-BY: Lam- i' u 11 7 90 ntracta Date Dizectox of Engineering Date "J-5" AGENDA ITEM #10( i ) DISTRICT 2 "J-5" COMM SANr CN4 DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COWY Page 1 of 2 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECT,TC AVENDE FSXX7MIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (11 CONTRACTOR: National Plant Services, Inc. DATE May 9, 1990 JOB: Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, between 32nd Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2 Mount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 1,305.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Contracts Nos. 5-27-1 and 5-37-2 Item 1 TIME EXTENSION The Contractor requested a time extension to the contract. The Contractor was doing emergency sewer damage investigation and repairs in San Francisco as a result of the earthquake. All of the Contractor's forces were mobilized to help in getting the sewers repaired and back into full service. It was determined to be in the best interest of the Districts and the public to delay the start of construction until the Contractor could be relieved of the emergency work in San Francisco. The time extension is authorized pursuant to Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER TTEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHAR ORDER ITEM: 60 Calendar Days Contract No. 5-37-2 Item 2 ADDITIONAL VIDEO INSPECTION The Contractor was directed to extend the limit of video taping from Manhole No. 44 to Manhole No. 45 and from Manhole No. 45 to Manhole No. 46 which is an additional 660 linear feet of video inspection. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,305.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Tice made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 60 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #10( I ) ( 1 ) - DISTRICTS 5 a 6 "K-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMM Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 WELTS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALTFORKM 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. W. One (1) CONTRACTOR: National Plant Services, Inc. DATE Mav 9, 1990 JOB: Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, between 32nd Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investwation of Pacific Coast Richwav Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date December 4, 1989 Original Corpletion Date February 1, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 60 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 60 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 120 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date April 2, 1990 Actual Final Ca:pletion Date April 2, 1990 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 108,321.40 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 1,305.00 Amended Contract Price $ 109,626.40 Board Authorization Date: May 9, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BY: Construction Manager Date NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES, INC. ACCEPTED BY: A BY:i Contractor Date Director of Engineering Date "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #10( 1 ) (1 ) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "K-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-50 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NOS. 5-27-1 AND 5-37-2 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING REHABILITATION OF BALBOA TRUNK SEWER, BETWEEN 32ND STREET AND CORONADO STREET, CONTRACT NO. 5-27-1, AND INVESTIGATION OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-2, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, National Plant Services, Inc. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2. on March 14, 1990; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated December 4, 1989; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby "L-1" AGENDA ITEM .#100 ) ( 2) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "L-1" authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section S. That the Final Closeout Agreement with National Plant Services, Inc., setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 5, acting for Itself and on behalf of District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990. L-2' AGENDA ITEM #100 ) (2) - DISTRICTS 5 8 6 „L-2^ RESOLUTION NO. 90-51-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 (ANNEXATION NO. 129 - GARRETT ANNEXATIUN) �./ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 129 - GARRETT ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That a request has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owners, Milton Garrett and Rex L. Xanders; and, Section 2. That the designation assigned by the District to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 129 - Garrett Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and. Section 3. That pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, application has heretofore been made by District No. 7 to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of Resolution No. 89-26-7, filed with said Commission by said District; and, Section 4. That the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Orange adopted its Resolution No. 90-08 on March 7, 1990, making determinations and approving proposed Annexation No. 129 to County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, without notice or hearing and without election; and, Section 5. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(m) - DISTRICT 7 "M 1" Section 6. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, `..� Section 7. That payment of annexation acreage fees in the amount of $9,339.07 has been made and all terms and conditions specified by the Local Agency Formation Commission have been satisfied; and, Section 8. That the District has agreed, pursuant to Section 99(h)(1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and, Section 9. That the regular County assessment roll is utilized by this District; and, Section 10. That the affected territory will be taxed for the existing bonded indebtedness of District No. 7; and, Section 11. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, Section 56837 of the California Government Code, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election; and, Section 12. That the Secretary of District No. 7 transmit a certified copy of this resolution, with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990. "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(m) - DISTRICT 7 "M-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-52-7 APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH GEORGE ADAMS, JR. RE SEWER LINE IN BAJA far/ PANORAMA STREET SERVING SIX LOTS WITHIN TRACT NO. 939 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH GEORGE ADAMS, JR. RE SEWER LINE IN BAJA PANORAMA STREET SERVING SIX LOTS LOCATED WITHIN TRACT NO. 939 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Reimbursement Agreement for Sewer Line in Baja Panorama Street dated February 1, 1990, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and George Adams, Jr. (developer) , providing for the District to reimburse the developer for a proportional share of his cost of constructing a sewer line in Baja Panorama Street, which will serve six lots located within Tract No. 939, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That reimbursement of said proportional share of the costs to developer, based on $8,257.00 per lot for Lots 7 and 9, (Lot 8 is owned by developer and developer has received reimbursement from the owners of Lots 10, 11 and 12) is hereby authorized to be made in accordance with the terns and conditions of said Reimbursement Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990. "N '" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) - DISTRICT 7 "N" ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO._ + + x + + x + + x + x x The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No._ of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: A. That a Comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan-1989", hereinafter the "Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering reports has been prepared, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors setting forth and identifying the required future development of District and jointly owned facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the District service area; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan have been made available to the public and been subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992 and other provisions of law; and, C. That the adoption of the proposed Capital Facilities connection charges will provide revenue to assist in the financing of Capital Facilities identified in the adopted Master Plan and deemed necessary to maintain service within the existing service area; and, "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(a) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11&13 110-11, D. That the change in rate structure will not necessarily -- result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The adoption of these rates will not result in any specific project nor result in a direct physical change in the environment; and, E. That the District has, on July 19, 1989, adopted a Final Program Environmental Impact Report in accordance with legally required notices and public hearing, relating to the Master Plan including the financial program to implement the construction of capital facilities identified in the Master Plan; and, F. That the District either has or will produce Negative Declarations, Environmental Impact Reports or other CEQA compliance prior to the construction of any capital improvement project planned for in the District's adopted Master Plan; and, G. That the proposed increases in the capital facilities connection charges are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each customer and the service and facilities provided to each new customer to the District; and, H. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b) ( 8) and California Code of Regulations Section 15273 (a) (4 ) ; and, I . That the new capital facilities connection fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(a) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11313 "0 2" `.►� in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992. NOW, THEREFORE, The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Section No. 702 of Ordinance No. is hereby amended to read: '1702. DISTRICT NO. 1 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit Required No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Capital Facilities Connection Charge Amounts The following District connection charges are hereby established commencing January 1, 1990, and shall be paid to the District or to an agency designated by the District: ( 1 ) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $2,280 per dwelling unit. "0-3" AGENDA ITEM #14(a ) - DISTRICTS 1, 2,3,5,6 ,7,11&13 "C-3" (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling building, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $2,280 per dwelling unit. (3 ) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including but not limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $460 per 1, 000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $2 ,280 . (4 ) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs 1 and 3 above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall "0-4" AGENDA ITEM #14(a) - DISTRICTS 1 ,2,3,5,6,7,11313 110-4" be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charge. (5) Capital Facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $2,280 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $460 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. C. Annual Adjustment of Charges Each year, commencing on July 1, 1990, and continuing thereafter on each July 1, the capital facilities connection fee shall be adjusted by an increment based on the change in the ENR Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles over the prior year, and rounded to the nearest $10 . "0-5" AGENDA ITEM t�14(a) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3.5.6,7, 11813 "0-5" i However, the District Board of Directors may at its option determine, by resolution adopted prior thereto, that such adjustment shall not be effective for the next succeeding year, or may determine other amounts, as appropriate. " Section 2. Fees established by Section 702 shall be effective July 11, 1990. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective July 11, 1990. Section 4. Ordinance No. _ is hereby repealed. Section 5. If any provision or Section of this Ordinance is declared to be unlawful, invalid, or in any manner unenforceable, then each and every other provision herein shall remain in force as though enacted independently. Section 6. The Secretary of the Board is hereby directed to certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the County. "0-G" AGENDA ITEM "14(a) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 , 11&13 "J-5" PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.—of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990, Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California i "0 "0-7" AGENDA ITEM 914(a) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11813 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. _ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. - of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: A. That a Comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989" , hereinafter the "Master Plan" , which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, has been prepared, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors setting forth and identifying the required future development of District and jointly-owned facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the District service area; and B. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan have been made available to the public and been subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992 and other provisions of law; and, i C. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the sewage collection facilities, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments or to repay Federal or State loans issued for the construction and "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(a ) - DISTRICTS 1.3.5,6.11 & 13 "P 1" reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of �./ administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and, D. That the properties upon which the fees established by this Ordinance are levied, discharge wastewater to the District' s collection, treatment and disposal facilities. The costs of operating and maintaining said facilities has constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process, and said costs now exceed the amounts of any ad valorem tax revenues received from said properties; and, E. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities is required to protect the public health and safety to preserve the environment without danger; and, F. That the new fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992; and, G. That the change in rate structure will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The adoption of these rates will not result in any specific project nor result in a direct physical change in the environment; and, H. That the District has, on July 19, 1989, adopted a Final Program Environmental Impact Report in accordance with legally required notices and public hearing, related to the Master Plan, including the financial program; and, "P-2" AGENDA ITEM .#15(a) - DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13 "P-2" I. That the proposed increases in the sewer service charges are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each customer and the service and facilities provided to each new customer to the District; and, J. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)( 8 ) and California Code of Regulations Sections 15273(a) . NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No._of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Section 1 of Ordinance No. is hereby amended to read: "Section 1: Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the established system of sanitary sewer service charges required to be paid by property owners for the services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with its sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the sewage collection facilities, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments or to repay Federal or State loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of "P-3" AGENDA ITEM #15(e) - DISTRICTS 1 .3 ,5 ,6,11 E 13 "P-3" said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. " Section 2: Section 2 of Ordinance No. is hereby amended to read: "Section 2: Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing July 1, 1990, each parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with structures designed for residential, commercial or industrial use and connected to the District's system, shall pay a sanitary sewer service charge based on the average volume of wastewater discharged by a class of users in the sum or sums as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance. " Section 3: If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by order of court, . the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected. Section 4: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1990. Section 5: Ordinance No. is hereby repealed. Section 6: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District, as required by law. "P-4" AGENDA ITEM #15(a) - DISTRICTS 1 ,3,5,5, 11 & 13 "P 4" PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of greater than ,- two-thirds of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California ( b\l .rr) "P-5" AGENDA ITEM N15(a) - DISTRICTS 1.3,5,6,11 & 13 "P-5" TABLE A ORDINANCE NO. 116 1990-91 Minimum Annual Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit Single-Family Charge Per $55.00 $55.00 Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit Condominiums Multi-Family Charge Per $33.00 $33.00 Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit Home/Apartments Commercial/ Charge per 1, 000 $39.00 $39.00 Industrial/Other square feet of (government building buildings, utilities nonprofit organizations, etc. ) "P-6" AGENDA ITEM #15(a) - DISTRICT 1 "P-6" TABLE A ORDINANCE NO. 314 1990-91 Minimum Annual Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit single-Family Charge Per $50.00 $30.00 Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit Condominiums Multi-Family Charge Per $30.00 $30.00 Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit Home/Apartments Commercial/ Charge per 1, 000 $36. 00 $36.00 Industrial/Other square feet of (government building buildings, utilities nonprofit organizations, etc. ) °R-7^ AGENDA ITEM #15(a) DISTRICT 3 �-7" TABLE A ORDINANCE NO. 523 1990-91 Minimum Annual Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit Single-Family Charge Per $55 . 00 $55. 00 Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit Condominiums Multi-Family Charge Per $33 . 00 $33 .00 Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit Home/Apartments commercial/ Charge per 1,000 $39.00 $39. 00 Industrial/Other square feet of (government building buildings, utilities nonprofit organizations, etc.) "P-8" AGENDA ITEM #15(a) - DISTRICT 5 "P 8" TABLE A ORDINANCE NO. 617 1990-91 Minimum Annual Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit Single-Family Charge Per $55.00 $55.00 Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit Condominiums Multi-Family Charge Per $33.00 $33 .00 Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit Home/Apartments Commercial/ Charge per 1,000 $39.00 $39.00 Industrial/Other square feet of (government building buildings, utilities nonprofit organizations, etc. ) "P-9" AGENDA ITEM #15(a) DISTRICT 6 "P-O" TABLE A ORDINANCE NO. 1113 1990-91 Minimum Annual Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit Single-Family Charge Per $50. 00 $50.00 Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit Condominiums Multi-Family Charge Per $30. 00 $30.00 Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit Home/Apartments Commercial/ Charge per 1,000 $36. 00 $36.00 Industrial/Other square feet of (government building buildings, utilities nonprofit organizations, etc. ) "P-10" AGENDA ITEM #15(a) - DISTRICT 11 "P-10" b.d TABLE A ORDINANCE NO. 1308 1990-91 Minimum Annual Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit Single-Family Charge Per $95.00 $95.00 Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit Condominiums Multi-Family Charge Per $57 . 00 $57.00 Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit Home/Apartments Commercial/ Charge per 1,000 $68.00 $68.00 industrial/Other square feet of (government building buildings, utilities nonprofit organizations, etc. ) "P-11" AGENDA ITEM =15(2) - DISTRICT 13 RESOLUTION NO. 90- DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 1990-91 PROPERTY TAX A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE 1990-91 PROPERTY TAX BILLS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. _, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. _ Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. and, WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such charges, as adopted by. District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, its general taxes. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to California Health 6 Safety Code Section 5473, the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer service charges, as established by Ordinance No. _, on the 1990-91 property tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this resolution remains "0-1" AGENDA ITEM 916 - DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13 110-11, in effect; and, Section 2. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by Ordinance No. _, is changed; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order set forth in Section 1 herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990. "0 2" AGENDA ITEI`1 »16 - DISTRICTS 1 ,3,5.6,11 & 13 "0-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS EI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 1, 1990 +GBwF EuiE cvEW E FOWF)YN V<LIFv.CaIIFOIINia 92)38-E+3) n+aresa.aan County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 STAFF REPORT Slater Avenue Pop Station Sewage System L%zovements Contract No. 11-17 I. SUMMARY The Slater Avenue Pimp Station Sewage System Inprovements Project Report has been completed. The report has a number of rec®mendations, including diversion of flow, upgrading existing sewers, construction of a new pimp station and exchange of capacity in some existing g facilities between Districts 3 and 11. The report estimates the total project cost to be $17,981,000 shared by both Districts 3 ($1,050,000) and 11 ($16,931,000). Enclosed is a copy of the report prepared by John Carollo Engineers. II. BACKGROUND County Sanitation District 11 is split into two separate drainage areas. The southerly portion drains through the existing reaches of the Coast Trunk Sewer directly to Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. The northwesterly portion, bounded by Cothatd Street on the east side and the San Diego Freeway on the north, including the Huntington Harbour area, drains to the Slater Avenue Pump Station between Goldenwest Street and Gothard Street, which lifts water over the Huntington Beach mesa easterly to the Knott interceptor (owned by Districts 3 and 11) and the Interplant Interceptor, owned jointly with all Districts, and then to Treatment Plant No. 2. For marry years, the extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer system and a new pimp station in Bolsa Chica were planned to serve the north Huntington Beach area, replacing the Slater Avenue Pun Station. Early studies were based on the assumption that the boundaries of District 11 and the City of Huntington Beach boundaries would be coteminous. However, Huntington Reach first developed in a northeasterly direction and that portion of the City is now, in District 3. In the early 19601s, the boundaries were extended westerly to include the Huntington Harbour area. Periodic, updated Master Plans have been the basis for orderly develoment of the District's sewerage system since the District was forTed. The 1982 Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts 2, 3 and 11, as well as the earlier District 11 Master Plan provided for the construction of the Coast Trunk Sewer. In 1979, the first leg of the Coast Trunk Sewer was built, extending frost Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Peach, northwesterly to Lake Street at walnut Avenue. This project was soon followed by the Newland Interceptor, cospletion of which allowed the \J Hamilton Avenue Pomp Station, located at Newland and Hamilton Avenues, to "R-1" AGENDA ITEM #33(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "R-1" May 1, 1990 Page Two be abandoned and also relieved the Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer and Atlanta Interceptor Sewer. The Coast Trunk Sewer was extended to Goldenwest Street at Orange Avenue in 1983. Planned future extensions of the Coast Trunk Sewer included a routing through Sea Cliff and Bolsa Chica (where the Bolsa Chica Puny Station would have been constructed) to Slater Avenue at Edwards Street and northerly in Edwards Street. This would allow the Slater Avenue Punp Station to be abandoned upon the completion of the Coast Trunk Sewer System. In 1987, the peak discharge from the Slater Avenue Pump Station reached 20 million gallons a day, the apprcxi, to design flaw. At that time, all five pumps were required to handle the flows. The fifth pump, which would normally be a standby pump, now runs about five percent of the time. Staff is concerned about the reliability of this essential service facility with the continuing and increasing depends being placed on the Slater Avenue Pump Station. If two pumps were out-of-service, the station would be seriously overloaded. The Districts, Maintenance Division is currently providing extra monitoring of this station to ensure continual operation, and has installed an on-site, standby power generator. Construction of Master-Planned facilities to relieve these deficiencies has been delayed pending an agreement on annexation of the Soles, Chico to District 11. 1989 MPSTFR PLAN The 1989 Master Plan found that most of the existing facilities in the northerly portion of District 11 would be deficient for meeting both short and long-term capacity requirements. The Master Plan identified potential areas which may annex to the District, including the Sunset Beach Sanitary District service area and the Bolsa Chica. While no new facilities would be required to serve the Sunset Beach area, in the analysis of the systems the Master Plan reccnuended facilities to serve the presently undeveloped Bolsa Chico area. The southeasterly area sewage conveyance system is still centered around the Coast Trunk and its collection from the Iake Avenue, Atlanta Avenue and Newland Street Interceptors. No sewage diversion points exist within this system. The Master Plan studies reviewed several alternatives to serve the northwest portion of District 11, and a large, soon to be developed adjacent portion of District 3. Instead of extending the Coast Trunk system as previously planned, the Master Plan found the rebuilding of the Slater Avenue Pump Station system to be the less costly. "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #33(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "R-2" may 1, 1990 V Page Three The deficiencies identified in the Master Plan for the northwesterly portion of District 11 were evaluated on a system-wide rather than compcnent-oriented approach and three conprehensive alternative operation and imp rDVedlent plans were developed and compared on a cost basis. The alternatives were: 1) To upgrade the identified deficient trunks and construct a new Slater Avenue Pump Station and Force Main; 2) To extend the Coast Trunk system northward to intercept flows including construction of a Bolsa Chica Pump Station near the westerly boundary of the southern portion of District 11 (the original, earlier plan); and 3) To intercept flows in the north of District 11 along tMFadden Avenue and construct a new "MrHadden Pump Station" which world pimp to the Miller-Holder Trunk. The alternative to iqurove the existing system and build a new Slater Avenue Pump Station (Alternative 1) proved to be the most cost-effective. The follu ing summarizes the Master Planned improvements needed to implement this alternative: " The Slater-Springdale Trunk requires a replacement sewer between Edinger and K-Fadden Avenues. " Replacement of the deteriorated and deficient Goldenwest Trunk with a 36- to 39-inch diameter sever between the Slater Avenue Pnmgp Station and Heil Avenue. " A 33-inch diameter interceptor is needed to extend westward along Heil Avenue to Springdale Street. " A reach of 12-inch diameter sewer is required to replace the northerly portion of the Goldenwest Trunk between Heil and Edinger Avenues. ° Relief trunks of 24- to 27-inch diameter are required along Warner Avenue between Bolsa Chica Road and Springdale Street. ° The Nichols Street Trunk requires a 27-inch diameter replacement sewer. ' The portion of the Slater Trunk between Nichols Street and the Knott Interceptor at Newland Street requires a 30- to 33-inch diameter relief parallel sewer. " The existing Edinger PwT Station will require improvements to increase its capacity. The Master Plan also concluded that a portion of the flu✓ fray the Slater Avenue system should be diverted to the Miller-Holder Trunk at Nichols Avenue by upgrading a portion the existing Nichols Street Trunk in order to maximize the use of the existing lines in Slater Avenue and capacity in both the Miller-Holder Trunk and Knott Interceptor. "R-3" AGENDA ITEM "33(b) - DISTRICTS 3 3 11 "R-5" May 1, 1990 Page Four III. PRQ7ECr REPDRT - Slater Avenue Pt= Station System In order to carry out the Master Plan, the Directors authorized John Carollo Engineers to prepare a Phase I, Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Amp Station Sewage System Improverents. The study area, smaller than the Master Plan study area, is shown on Figure 2-1, attached. The Project Report confinned the 1989 Master Plan and included studies detailing the size and construction requirements of the pump station, size and preliminary plan and profiles for trunk sewer inprovenents both to and from the station, necessary data for acquisition of a site from GTE, and the preparation of a financial analysis of cost sharing between Districts 3 and 11. The Project Report contains the following recamendations: A. Sewerage to the Amp Station 1. The existing Slater-Springdale Relief Trunk should be relieved by diverting 6.55 mgd to new 27-inch and 36-inch sewers in Heil Avenue flawing east to Goldenwest Street (Heil Avenue Interceptor. ) (In addition, a relief line between Edinger Avenue end McFadden Avenue is needed in the future, per the Master Plan.) 2. The existing 12- and 15-inch Goldenwest Trunk Sewer, in need of replacement for both capacity and structural reasons, should be removed and replaced in the same location in Goldenwest Street between Heil Avenue and Slater Avenue with a new 42-inch diameter serer. (In addition, per the Master Plan, the line will need to be replaced in the future between Heil Avenue and Edinger Avenue.) 3. The existing influent pipe on Slater Avenue from Goldenwest Street easterly should be paralled with a new 42-inch diameter sewer to a point 180 feet just upstream of the pimp station, and a 72-inch diameter sewer to the nev pimp station should constructed. 4. A new pimp station with adequate vehicular access should be constructed just east of the existing station. B. Sewerage from the Amp Station 1. Construct a new 36-inch diameter ductile iron pipe force main in Slater Avenue from the pmp station to Gothard Street. 2. Construct a new 36-inch diameter gravity sewer in Slater Avenue between Gothard Street and Nichols Street. "R-4" AGENDA ITEM `33(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "R-LI" May 1, 1990 Page Five 3. Divert 5.4 sgd (average flow) from the Miller-Holder trunk to the Nichols Street Gravity Sewer. 4. Construct a parallel 33-inch diameter relief sewer in Slater Avenue from Koledo Iane to Beach Boulevard and a parallel 36-inch diameter sewer from Beach Boulevard to Newland Street. Table 6-1 (attached) shows the proposed cost sharing for the above projects based on approval of a preannexation agreemart for Bolsa Chica. If the Bolsa Chica area does not sewer through the Slater Avenue Sewage System, total project cost will show a decrease, and the cost-sharing fonmla will change. This Project Report Scope did not include a detailed analysis of the relief line in Warner Avenue between Springdale Street and Bolsa Chico Road. The report also found that the upgrading of the Nichols Avenue Trunk Sewer, identified in the Master Plan, would not be required at this time. The new pump station is planned to be constructed adjacent to the existing station. Since it will be larger than the existing station, a larger site is needed. The land is owned by General Telephone and Electronics (GTE) and used as an employee parking lot. Proposed is a negotiated land purchase and exchange, whereby the existing site is deeded to GIE upon completion of the new pump station, and the increase in site square footage paid for on the basis of a negotiated price. IV. PROMCT COST FOR NEW FAC=IES The inprovmeats described in the Project Report to alleviate the deficiencies are either solely District 11 facilities or jointly shared facilities of Districts 3 and 11 and as such a project cost-split was made on a projected average flow basis. The following sumrarizes that analysis of both new and existing facilities. "R-5" AGENDA ITEM #33(h) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "R-5" may 1, 1990 Page Six COST AL1OC=ON FOR NEW IMPROVEMENTS* Project District 3 District 11 Item Cost Cost Cost Neil Avenue Interceptor (3) $ 3,484,000 0 $ 3,484,000 Goldenwest Trunk Sewer (2) 4,302,000 0 4,302,000 Slater Avenue Pump Station Influent Relief Sewer (1) 737,000 261,000 476,000 Slater Avenue Force Main/Gravity Seder/ Diversion Structure (1) 1,141,000 131,200 1,009,800 Slater Avenue Relief Seders (3) 2,597,000 0 2,597,000 Slater Avenue Pump Station/72-Inch Influent (1) 5,720,000 657,800 5,062,200 TOTAL $17,981,000 $1,050,000 $16,931,000 NOTE: Nos. 1, 2 and 3 identify priority rating. *Additional, longer-range needs were not includeed in the Project Report study area. 1..) "R-6" AGENDA ITEM �33(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "R-6" TABLE 6-1 PROJECT COST SPLIT NEW n&PROVEEIENTS District District. District District No. 3 No. 11 No. 3 .No. 11 District District cDi Flow(2) Flow Share Share No. 3 No. 11 z IIeul Project Cost11) IMGD) IMGD) (40 M Cost Cost ZV a y Ifell Avenue m Inlerceplor $3,484,000 0 NA O 100 O $3.484,000 3 w Golden Wesl Tnnrk W Sewer $ 4,302 000 0 NA 0 100 O $4.302,000 Q Slater Avenue Pump Slallon Influent o Relief Sewer $ 737,000 2.33 4.26 35.4 64.6 $ 261.000 $ 476.000 N � Staler Avelure Force Main/Gravity Sewer/ r, Diversion Slmcture $ 1,141,000 2.33 17.94 11.5 88.5 $ 131,200 $ 1.009,800 --I N W Slater Avemic Relief po Sewers $ 2.597.000 O NA 0 100 0 $ 2.597.000 r— Slater Avenue Pump Slallon/72" I11011enl $_5,720,000 2.33 17.94 11.5 88.5 $ 657.800 $5,062.200 $17.981,000 $1.050,000 $16.931.000 (1) Costs 3rd Quarter 1989 121 All flows average 10 I ` r Legend C APPRAPPRORIYATE SCALESOALE 1~ 1 fl0[ . WW SANK,SYNIE 1 i3 1 N— 4nplerYnenM TO RNIINn N 11 1 Ole (UM,50weY-Naw ems SPw,f -UK.rmm 6ar.M n IW N 1 A.PI. 1 ———— SNIV Ave. 1611E1L AVENUE INTEACEPiOA _ __ Rp,.N •r YYW)bWI m _ nu .._ Z 1 v' ae' ae' ' Fv � .PmMI arr NNC Wenagor CJ IL n z� iQ oE� � 1 NeW New Fwu YM ••••••••••••• NpKNNe Ateel m NILI ER-IIIII OER TRUNK f SEWEA CT S. rt la 'f pl Y _(Wq1 rY+R TI�YV9 SLrL"A'AGTTErErflA----SSYSPNiRI�INIWG�GRAiALIF E� �iAF`wRrWIE Kr SEWrEN I as N EW : _r_ aa' PARALLEL EL IiIIIIr ARALLEL SLATER AME olvERT PUMP STRUCTURE e f � 1JL/ef _�J 9IATI0N Y/ RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE.7-1 SLATER AVENUE PUUP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM WROVEMENTS COUNTY SANIPIIOY OISTIUM Of OR..OE COUNFY n� N E'S CD RESOLUTION NO. 90-53 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICTS 3 AND 11 RE JOINT SEWAGECOLLECTION A I A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICTS 3 AND 11, PROVIDING FOR FINANCING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, CAPACITY OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION OF CERTAIN MASTER-PLANNED SEWAGE COLLECTION FACILITIES FOR SERVING DISTRICTS 3 AND 11 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors, on July 19, 1989, approved and adopted the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan dated February 1989; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors, on May 9, 1990, approved and adopted a Project Report relative to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, dated April 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, said Master Plan and Project Report set forth certain master-planned joint sewage collection facilities required for serving portions of Districts Nos. 3 and 11. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 and County Sanitation District No. 11, providing for the financing, design, construction, capacity ownership and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities for serving Districts Nos. 3 and 11, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said Agreement provides for the joint construction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station, including the Slater Avenue Pump Station Influent `.d "S-1" AGENDA ITEM �33(0) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "S-1" Relief Sewer, Force Main, Gravity Sewer, and Diversion Structure; provides for costs to be shared in proportion to average flow contribution resulting in approximately 86.2% of the cost to be paid by District No. 11 and 13.8% to be paid by District No. 3, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and further provides that said ratio may be changed if the flow ratio changes from that provided in the Project Report, to be determined at the time final design is approved by the Boards of Directors; and, Section 3. That said Agreement provides for the exchange of capacity in existing sewer collection facilities, including the Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer, the Newland Street Interceptor, the Coast Trunk Sewer, Slater Avenue Force Main, Nichols Street Gravity Sewer and Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, in accordance with the previously-adopted capacity exchange formula, resulting in a net buy-in cost for the sale of capacity from District No. 11 to District No. 3 in the amount of $630,836.00, as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the Chairmen and Secretary of Districts Nos. 3 and 11 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990. "S-2" AGENDA ITEM =33(d) - DISTRICTS 3 8 11 "S-2" PIUM MINARY F TDffl TF OF COST ATTl=0N FOR SLATER AVENGE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSUM Dd'AOVQMTS Project Dist. 3 Dist. 11 It® cost cost ($1 Cost (8) Slater Avenue PuV Station Influent Relief Sewer $ 737,000 $261,000 (35.4%) $ 476,000 (64.6%) Slates Avenue Force Main/Gravity Sewer/ Diversion Strwture 1,141,000 131,200 (11.5%) 1,009,800 (88.5%) Slater Avenue Pump Station/72-Inch Influent 5,720,000 657,800 (11.5%) 5,062.200 (88.5%) TOM $7,598,000 $1,050,000 (13.8%) $6,548,000 (86.2%) ,"W/ EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 90-53 "S-3" AGENDA ITEM A33(0) - DISTRICTS 3 W 11 "S-3" r PROJECT BOY-M COSTS Exisllna t)•1llu1rs1oi Y4 Neednl OwnershlD Bkl hhwdn Cmtl Ugiuled District Dlslric( District District District District Ileru Cost 3 11 3 11 3 II n ISNHIA= 5766 m m z no 'LI-hair Slider n Avenue Fm:c Moll 1) $ IBfialkl 0 Ilkl 11.5 88.5 $ 19.0m to y Nichols Sirrrl m —1 tirdvlly Sewn 3 MI1296.1:11121 $ 602.6(X) 0 1110 42.1 579 $254.0W O it W Wti Newl:uul/UrLnruu•/I:11 O. O uual Tl'unh Exclnuylc N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $563.036 II a � m Mllkrllukk:r n O 9Yuuk Sewer $6.450.0D0 100 0 96.4 3.60 O $232_200 C a CDTw als $663 036 $232.200 a No Net Buy-in Cosl to District 3 $630.636 - w � O 111 (IIII)• IIII:Inde5111r 24'Iru hl fiuee Illnlll lhl:ll WIII (e1118111 kl yrNICC. N r'r 121 1,411 1:11 Is al Ailllcr-1 bldcr'D'uuk Sewer ui Nlclols Slmd. 13) Flom N911dan Ih•pm1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 39 59 69 79 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON APRIL 11, 1990 Pp1iTlrloH Y5 aopoliian Qo DIs,. 0 Si-c.1954 Y gq 'GE CoVN�` ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, It, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on April 11, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Dan Griset, Chairman Dan Young Richard B. Edgar, Chairman pro tem =Ursula Kennedy =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth x James A. Wahner _Orma Crank DISTRICT NO. 2: x Roland E. Bigonger, Chai rumn _Henry W. Medea x James Neal, Chairman pro in _George Scott 7--A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Herby =Dan Griset Dan Young William D. Mahoney =Beth Graham =Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin 7—Arthur G. Newton Norman Z. Eckenrode _Bob Perry -7—Norman Culver a Iry Pickier Fred Hunter a Wayne Siltel _Harold Saldarini x Oon E. Smith —Fred Barrera =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman Eva G. Miner =Carrey Nelson, Chairman pro tan _Wayne Wedin z Margaret M. Arnold _Cecilia L. Age xWes Bannister Peter Green x A.B. "Buck" Catlin __Chris Herby =Norman Culver _Bob Perry x Beth Graham _William D. Mahoney -7—Don R. Griffin _Donna L. Chessen 7—Dan Griset _Dan Young x James Neal _George Scott a Iry Pickier Fred Hunter 7—J.R. 'Bob- Siefen __Dewey Wiles =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth x Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom 3 Paul Verellen —Edward L. Allen =Edna Wilson _Victor Grgas DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Ruthelyn Plumer =Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem John C. Cox, Jr. _Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman James M. Ferryman _Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem -7—Evelyn Hart _Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman Fred Barrera Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tem z Ursula Kennedy a John C. Cox, Jr. _Ruthelyn PIuner =Dan Griset Dan Young —Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton =Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran =James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tom Mays, Chairman Jim Silva Grace Winchell, Chairman pro tan x Peter Green x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Media, Chairman Roland E. Bigonger -7—Iry Pickier, Chairmen pro tom —Fred Hunter Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton =Don E. Smith Fred Barrera Bayne Wedin x Carrey Nelson DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller =Ursula Kennedy, Chairman pro tam Richard B. Edgar Don R. Roth =_Roger Stanton -7—Sally Anne Sheridan _Larry Agran -7—Don E. Smith Fred Barrera -2- 04/11/90 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Mark Esquer, Penny Kyle, John Linder, Rory Nelson, Bob Ooten, Rich von Langan, Jack Vincent OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark Ide, Jamel Demir, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, Jeff Lauria * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that Repor of the Joint Chairman District No. 2 would be adjourning to Wednesday, April 18th, at 7:30 p.m. , for a public hearing to be held at the Orange Public Library with regard to use of the County of Orange property tax roll for billing of District sewer service charges beginning July 1, 1990, and to consider adoption of the District's 1990-91 annual sewer service charge report. He also advised that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, April 19th, at 5:30 p.m. Mr. Catlin then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, April 25th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Arthur Newton and Phil Sansone to attend and participate in the discussions. The Joint Chairman further reported that a Joint Works Selection Committee meeting had been scheduled for Wednesday, April 25th, immediately following the Executive Committee meeting. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that Report of the General Manager earlier that week he had transmitted to the Directors, copies of nominations submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District for the SCAQMD 1990-91 Clean Air Awards, which included several of the Districts' air quality programs. He noted that one of the Districts' projects for air toxics and health risk assessment had recently been awarded first place winner by the American Academy of Environmental Engineers in the research category. The project was conducted by a team of staff members and consultant Malcolm Pirnie. The Director of Engineering then addressed the Board and reported on the environmental award the Districts had recently received from the American Academy of Environmental Engineers. Mr. Dawes reviewed various measures taken by the Districts to ensure compliance with SCAQMD air quality requirements in order to secure permits for expansion of the treatment facilities at Plant No. 1. He advised that Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. had designed the new covers for the primary basins at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 and the foul air scrubber systems. The Districts had also directed the consultant to study and determine whether the air toxics level had been reduced as a result of the covering of the primary basins. Mr. Dawes then introduced a representative of Malcom Pirnie, Mr. Jeff Lauria. Mr. Lauria stated that this award was given for the best air toxics and emissions project in the nation. He added that the Districts should consider it a great honor to receive this environmental award. -3- 04/11/90 He then gave a slide presentation showing the various projects and facilities that have been constructed in order to comply with SCAQMD requirements, including those projects which enabled the Districts to receive the environmental award. The Joint Chairman then accepted the award from Mr. Laurie on behalf of the Boards of Directors and Districts' staff. Chairman Catlin expressed the Boards' appreciation to the Districts' staff and the consultant for their efforts in achieving this environmental award and maintaining the Districts' reputation for excellence. ALL DISTRICTS The Districts' General Counsel Authorizing consideration of reported that the Districts had been su le mental a enda item re Summons served with a Summons and Complaint and omplaint, Recon teel Placers subsequent to the agenda being posted, vs. Kiewit Pacific Co. , et al . , involving a subcontractor, Recon Steel Case­N0. 620729, re Job NOS. P1-20 Placers, who had filed a Stop Notice and PI-31 against the Districts' general Contractor, Kiewit Pacific Co. , in connection with Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31. Because he may be required to respond to said lawsuit prior to the May Board meeting, the General Counsel advised that it would be necessary for the Board to consider the matter that evening. The General Counsel pointed out that because the proposed supplemental agenda item was unable to be posted 72 hours prior to the meeting, the Boards must vote on whether the matter should be considered prior to actually voting on the recommended action. He noted that the decision by the Boards to consider this matter must be adopted by a two-thirds vote of those present. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to a Summons and Complaint (Action to Enforce Notice to Withhold; Labor and Material Bond) , Recon Steel Placers vs. Kiewit Pacific Co. , at al . , Case No. 620729, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board Meeting because the need to take action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and om R nt Recon Steel Placers vs. Kiewit Pacif c That the Summons and Complaint (Action Co.. at al. Case No. re to Enforce Notice to Withhold; Labor Job Nos. P1- 0 and P1- 1 and Material Bond) , Recon Steel Placers vs. Kiewit Pacific Co. , et al ., Case No. 620729, relative to a Stop Notice filed in connection with Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the Districts' interests in this matter, as necessary. -4- 04/11/90 DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 14, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 14, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the _ regular meeting held March 14, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 14, 1990, nor the adjourned regular meeting held April 5, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 14, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 14, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 14, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 14, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 14, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- 04/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Maims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 3/14/90 3/28190 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 794,025.17 $1,030,159.04 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 841,358.48 5,175,046.30 Joint Working Capital Fund - 158,317.64 107,381.19 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 11,006.37 6,079.75 DISTRICT NO. 1 - -a- 1,706.64 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 10,151.03 1,230,836.7E DISTRICT NO. 3 - 12,083.60 29,817.61 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,135.39 263,940.34 DISTRICT NO. 6 - -0- 727.20 DI TRI— C - 15,791.30 293,783.31 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 312.69 10,687.08 DISTRICT NO. 1N0. 1" - -0- -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - 9,700.10 529,246.16 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 1,827.28 3,564.61 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,273.79 34.88 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 472.53 4,219.60 1,860,45 .3 8,687,TJF47 ALL DISTRICTS Following a discussion of the status Authorizing staff to issue purchase of the Districts' investigation of orders to Hauter Ford (Specification alternative clean burn fuels for fleet No. A-150-1 and to Michael Chevrolet vehicles, it was moved, seconded and Specification No. A-150-2 duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue purchase orders pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program of the State of California, and State of California Contract Nos. 1-90-23-10 and 1-90-23-20, as follows: - Hauter Ford in the amount of $44,930.00 plus tax for the purchase of Five (5) 4-Door Compact Sedans (Specification No. A-150-1) ; and, - Michael Chevrolet in the amount of $86,535.00 plus tax, for the purchase of Nine (9) Pick-Up Trucks, (Specification No. A-150-2) FURTHER MOVED: That said purchases be subject to confirmation that the vehicles are compatible for conversion to clean burn alternative fuels. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Ferrous Chloride, Specification No. P-119, That the Boards of Directors hereby to Imperial West Chemical Company adopt Resolution No. 90-24, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Ferrous Chloride, Specification No. P-119, to Imperial West Chemical Company, for the delivered price of $238.58 per dry ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning May 13, 1990, with option for a one-year extension (Estimated annual cost $441,373.00 plus sales tax). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -6- 04/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Nj�rov n Chan e r er o 2 to Purchase r er No. i 4 ssued to That Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Continental Graphics re Order No. 40298 issued to Continental 3pecIfica on No. Z.-U44 Graphics for Blueprinting. Photocopying and Related Services, Specification No. 5-044, increasing the gross annual amount from $135,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $165,000.00 through July 15, 1990, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Autho riz ng staff o is s u e Change order No. 1 o Purchase rder That staff be, and is hereby, o. 39874 issued to Associated authorized to issue Change Order No. 1 Soils Engineering, Inc. to Purchase Order No. 39874 issued to Associated Soils Engineering, Inc., increasing the total amount from $50,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $100,000.00 through June 14, 1991. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Chan rir 0 an se ci cNo2or That Change Order No. 28 to the plans Job Nos. Pi-zu and P1- 1 and specifications for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of $71,636.00 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for 11 items of miscellaneous modifications and additions, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the ti SeleconCOT ttee o ne o late A dendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and ra essiona Sery ces A reemen is hereby, authorized to solicit a with Bo e n ineerin or oration proposal and negotiate Addendum No. 2 or es gn of Job No. J-17 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction services required re Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, to provide for escalating costs and additional construction services. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving ran of Easement to Southern California Edison company That the Boards of Directors hereby re Job No. PI- 4-2 adopt Resolution No. 90-25, approving and authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to Southern California_ Edison Company for right-of-way required to operate and maintain Southern California Edison's equipment which will provide power to the new electrical service center now under construction as part of Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -7- 04/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: MReceive, file and den claim of i lbert Hidden That the claim of Gilbert Hulden dated February 21, 1990, in the amount of $1,100.00 for damage to his vehicle allegedly caused by hitting a guard post while backing out of a parking space at Plant No. 2, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of James E. Wilson and That the claim of James E. Wilson and a rina Wilson Brown Katrina Wilson Brown dated March 2, 1990, for property damages in the amount of $418.00 and for medical costs in an undetermined amount, allegedly caused by an automobile accident involving a District vehicle, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee' s meeting on March 28, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to place all-risk insurance coverage, including That staff be, and is hereby, earthquake, flood, fire and other authorized to place all-risk property perils, effective April 14, 199U insurance coverage, including earthquake, fire, flood and other perils, effective April 14, 1990, for an annual premium of $326,150.00, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee, as follows: Facilities Covered: Treatment plants and pump stations (excludes sewer lines and ocean outfalls) Limits of Coverage: $35,000,000 Deductibles: Earthquake: 10% of replacement cost Flood: - Existing Facilities - $ 50,000 - Facilities under construction - 150,000 Other Perils: - 25,000 -B- 0a/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending lass ca ton and ompensati on Resolution o. - That the Boards of Directors hereby as amended, es ab is n n ineerin adopt Resolution No. 90-26, amending and Scientific n ern Program Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing Engineering and Scientific Intern Program providing for the Engineering, Technical Services and Operations 8 Maintenance Departments to hire engineering and science students as interns during the summer and on a part-time basis during the school year. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amend in lassification an com ensa on Resolution No. 7 - That the Boards of Directors hereby as amen ed re su emen ar adopt Resolution No. 90-27, Amending staffing addt ions require re Classification and Compensation .. Finance Department reorganization Resolution No. 79-20, as amended; re supplementary staffing additions required in connection with Finance Department reorganization. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Com ensation Resolution No. 79-20, That the Boards of Directors hereby as amende establishin a 990 adopt Resolution No. 90-28, Amending Sumer Work Program Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1990 Sumner Work Program for painting, grounds maintenance and pump station maintenance work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving ndment No. I to Em to ee Commuter ra ram re u re That Amendment No. 1 to Employee y CAQM0 Rule 1503E Commuter Program, implementing vanpooling and rideshare incentives to help meet Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) goals to comply with SCAQMD Rule 1503, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby declare that said rideshare incentives are established at the Boards' discretion and are subject to change by the Boards at any time. ALL DISTRICTS Ac ons re substitution of electrical subcontractor re Job No. J- -2 Receive and file correspondence Moved, seconded and duly carried: dated March 15, 1990 from Brinderson Corporation That the correspondence dated March 15, 1990 from Brinderson Corporation requesting substitution of electrical subcontractor listed .-. In bid proposal for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, with no change in contract amount, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -9- 04/11/90 Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported that Brinderson Corporation, contractor for construction of Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, in a letter dated March 15, 1990, advised the Districts of his intent to substitute the named subcontractor for the electrical portion of the project (Bergelectric Corporation) because said subcontractor failed to execute a subcontract. Notice was served on the subcontractor of the contractors' request and, to date, the Districts have not received an objection from the subcontractor. Mr. Woodruff advised, however, that in accordance with Section 4107 of the California Public Contracts Code, it was appropriate for the Boards to delegate to the General Manager, or his designee, the authority to act as hearing officer and make a final non-appealable decision on the request of Brinderson Corporation to substitute for said electrical subcontractor, should Bergelectric Corporation protest the proposed substitution. Authorizing the General Manager or Moved, seconded and duly carried: his desi nee to act as hearin officer and to make final non- That the General Manager, or his appealable decision on the request designee, be, and is hereby, of Brinderson Cor orat on re authorized to act as hearing Substitution of electrical officer and to make a final subcontractor non-appealable decision on the request of Brinderson Corporation, contractor for Job No. J-19-2, to substitute the subcontractor for the electrical portion of said job, in accordance with Section 4107 of the California Public Contracts Code. DISTRICTS 1 2,3,5,6,7,11 6 13 ctions re introduction of proposed ordinances increasing sewer connection charges . Report of General Counsel The General Counsel reported that the purpose of the ordinances to be considered for introduction and first reading that evening were to make adjustments in the annual connection charges for each of the eight Districts. The increases are based on the Districts' adopted financial plan and the staff report and recommendations included with the agenda material. The connection charges are paid by new development and are used to pay for construction of new capital facilities. Mr. Woodruff pointed out that the ordinances are identical for each District and advised that the form of ordinance mailed with the agenda material inadvertently included the charges currently in effect rather than the recommended adjusted amounts. He noted that the correct amounts which will be included in the new ordinances being considered are $2,280 per residential dwelling unit (rather than $2,270 per dwelling unit) and $460/1,000 sq. ft. for commercial and industrial buildings (rather than $450/1,000 sq. ft.) If acted upon by the Directors, the ordinances will pass to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990. Directors suggested that upon adoption of these ordinances, the various cities that collect connection fees -on behalf of the Districts should be required to acknowledge that they have been advised of the increases in the charges. Staff noted that letters would be sent to all cities advising them of the increased charges, and that a public workshop would be scheduled for city staff members responsible for collection of the Disricts' connection charges. -10- 04/11/90 Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated March 21, 1990 re proposed Ordinances, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 ' Actions re proposed Ordinance o. 115 Makin findin that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly r nance Na. 115 s categorically carried: exemp per 7EQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County sanitation District No. 1 of Orange ' County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage -- Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 114, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly rdinance o. 11 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 114, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 115 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 114, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. -11- 04/11/90 DISTRICT 2 c ens re proposed Ordinance o. 1 'r►' Mein findin that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly r inance o. 11 is categorically carried: exempt per CEQA Guidellnes That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 209, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of •• the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly r nonce d. carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 209, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 211 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 209, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 3 PEER! ons re proposed Ordinance o. 1 Makin f�indii that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly Urd name No. �i� s cam cam carried: exempt per ULIA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange -12- 04/11/90 County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 312, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b) (8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 313 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 312, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 313 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 312, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 5 Actions re proposed Ordinance No. 522 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 522 is categorically carried: exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 520 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 521, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b) (8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. -13- 04/11/90 First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly r nance o. carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 520 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 521, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 522 by title only, it was • moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of •• County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 520 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 521, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 6 Actions re proposed Ordinance No. 61b Ma'Ince No findin that ado t122 of Moved, seconded and duly rdi . 1 s ca a or cal carried: exempt per CEQA GuideTines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 615, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly rdinance o. 1 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 615, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. -14- 04/11/90 Following the reading of Ordinance No. 616 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 615, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 7 Ac ons re proposed ordinance No. 7 F Makin findin that ado tion of Moved, seconded and duly Minh o. s ca a or ca carried: exempt per CEQA Guioeiines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 723, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First readin of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly rdinance o. carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 723, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 724 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 723, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. -15- 04/11/90 DISTRICT 11 Actions re DroDosed Ordinance NO. Makin findin that ado ion of Moved, seconded and duly r nance o. 1 s cate orical carried: exempt per E;EQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1111, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First readln of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly r nance No. III carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1111, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1112 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1111, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 13 Actions re proposed Ordinance No. 1307 Makin findin that ado tion of Moved, seconded and duly Ord nance o. 1307 is cate or ca carried: exemp per A uidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of -16- 04/11/90 Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1306, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a - regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First reading of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly -Ordinance No. 13 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1306, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED; That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1307 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1306, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13 Actions re introduction of proposed ordinances increasing sanitary sewer service charges Report of General Counsel The General Counsel called the Directors' attention to the staff report mailed with the agenda material which outlined the basis for staff's recommendations relative to adjustments to the sanitary sewer service charges for each District. In accordance with the Districts' adopted financial plan, these fees are used for the operation, maintenance and rehabilitation costs, which vary somewhat from District to District, depending upon each District's financial situation. Mr. Woodruff pointed out that District No. 2 just recently enacted a sewer service charge ordinance for the first time. District No. 7 has not yet adopted sewer service charges. He also advised that Irvine Ranch Water District pays user fees to District No. 14 in lieu of District No. 14 adopting sewer service charges. The General Counsel added that if acted upon by the Districts, the proposed ordinances providing for adjustments to the sanitary sewer service charges will pass to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990. -17- 04/11/90 Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated March 22, 1990 re proposed Ordinances, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 ct ons re proposed Ordinance NO. 11 Makin find9n that ado tion of Moved, seconded and duly .. r nan ce No. 11 1s statutor carried: Exempt per CEDA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection ofthe environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First readin of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly rdinance N0. 116 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 116 by title only, it was - moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. -16- 04/11/90 DISTRICT 3 Actions re proposed Ordinance o. 314 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 314 1s statutorily carried: exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 314 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 314 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 5 ' Actions re proposed Ordinance No. 523 Makin findin that ado tion of Moved, seconded and duly Or inance N6 . is statutorily carried: exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds. that adoption of Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the -19- 04/11/90 Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for \./ meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First readin of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly r nance 0. 5 3 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the Board of • Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance In its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 523 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 6 Actions re proposed Ordinance NO. Makin findin that ado tion oP Moved, seconded and duly r nance No. 7 is statu toril carried: exempt perGuidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. -20- 04/11/90 First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 617 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, - California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 617 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 11 Actions re proposed Ordinance o. 1113 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 1113 is statutoril carried: exempt per J.LIJA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly Or inance No. Ill carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1113 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: -21- 04/11/90 That Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1108, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 13 c ons re proposed ordinance No.-1368 Makin findin that ado tI2n of Moved, seconded and duly rdinance Na. 1 s HIE u or carried: exempt per CE A Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First readin of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 1 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1308 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m. , April 11, 1990. -22- 04/11/90 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Easement Deed from The Irvine Company required re That the Board of Directors hereby Contract No. 5-35-1 adopts Resolution No. 90-32-5, approving and accepting Easement Deed from The Irvine Company, at no cost to the District, required in connection with construction and perpetual right-of-way needed relative to South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I , Contract No. 5-35-1. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-35-1 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-33-5, approving plans and specifications for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I, Contract No. 5-35-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of Brian Mathews That the claim of Brian Mathews dated February 14, 1990, in the amount of $100,000.00 plus all expenses related to medical care, for damage and injuries allegedly resulting from a bicycle accident caused by a manhole cover, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m. , April 11, 1990. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m. , April 11, 1990. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m. , April 11, 1990. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ad3ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m. , April 11, 1990. ^ -23- (REVISED) 04/11/90 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. I to e Tans and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Contract No. - - and specifications for North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer) , Contract No. 2-11-3, authorizing an addition of $18,045.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons (JV) for four items of additional work and granting a time extension of 15 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving hange r er o. 5 to the laps and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 5 to the plans contract Nos. 2-26-2 and Z-27 and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, authorizing an addition of $24,009.00 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp. for six items of additional work and granting a time extension of two calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No 69 - Brohn Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-29-2, ordering annexation of 4.76 acres of territory to the District in the vicnity of Timkin Lane and Coyote Lane in the City of Anaheim (Annexation No. 69 - Brohn Annexation). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 7 - Wilson Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-30-2, ordering annexation of 2.102 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Vista del Sol in the City of Anaheim (Annexation No. 70 - Wilson Annexation). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 ct ons re ative to emergency repairs equired In connection with C re Is Avenue Subtrunk Sewer Contract No. -9R Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that the Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, built in 1960, 1s a 15-inch line which services portions of the cities of Fullerton and Brea. On the west side of the Orange Freeway, north of Bastanchury Road, the sewer line is an easement which meanders through an apartment complex adjacent to a flood control channel. Recently, and without the District's knowledge, fill had been placed over the sewer line and, in doing so, the weight of the soil and the earthmoving equipment crushed portions of the line. He noted that no sewage was spilled; however, the sewer was in danger of collapse. Staff had, therefore, begun emergency repairs. -24- (REVISED) 04/11/90 Staff requested that the Board ratify their action in issuing purchase orders for the first phase of the emergency repair work, including necessary engineering support services, T.V. inspection of the line and construction work in an amount not to exceed $250,000. Mr. Dawes also recommended that the staff and General Counsel be authorized to investigate the cause and determine responsibility for the damage. Ratif in action of staff in Moved, seconded and duly carried: issuin emer enc urc ase orders for Repairs to ress Avenue That the Board of Directors hereby Subtrunk 5ewer, tontraCt No. 2-9R ratifies the action of staff in issuing emergency purchase orders in a total amount not to exceed $250,000.00 for the first phase of necessary Repairs to Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9R; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to investigate to determine responsibility for the damage to the District's sewer. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., April 18, 1990, at the Orange Public Library, 101 North Center Street, Orange, California, for a public hearing pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 5473.1 for the purpose of reviewing written reports pertaining to the provision of sewer service for all properties within County Sanitation District No. 2, and to consider public comments regarding use of the County of Orange property tax roll for billing of District sewer service charges for sewer collection, treatment and disposal services, commencing with the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1990. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:23 p.m. , April 11, 1990. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the tans and s ecifications re That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and Contrac o. 3-3 R specifications for Rehabilitation of Manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-33R, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approv ng Addendum No. 2 to the , Tans and specifications re That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and contract No. J-JJR specifications for Rehabilitation of Manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-33R, making miscellaneous clarifications and including Section 7028.15 of the California Business and Professions Code re Contractors' licensing, be, and is hereby, approved. -25- (REVISED) 04/11/90 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ward n Contracg. t No. - R o an con Engineerin Inc. That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-31-3, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Rehabilitation of Manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-33R, to Sancon Engineering, Inc. in the total amount of $2,253,300.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Actions relat ve to emer ent re airs re sewer reak n ea Beach Force Man Contract NO. -1 R Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that the western portion of District No. 3 drains to a collection system served by the Seal Beach Pump Station located on the northeast corner of Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue. Water from this system is pumped easterly through a dual force main to a gravity sewer located half-way between Bolsa Chica Avenue and Springdale Avenue. Both force mains are 30 inches in diameter and constructed of Techite Pipe, a reinforced plastic pipe. The first of these mains was installed in 1970 and the second in 1979. Mr. Dawes reported further that a sewer break occurred on March 26th in one of the two parallel forte mains at a location where the pipe exits a steel casing underneath a Navy railroad on the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station property. A small amount of sewage was spilled but was collected in a sump, gathered and returned to the sewer system. All water in the force main system was diverted to the second barrel and flow from the Seal Beach Pump Station was uninterrupted. Emergency actions were immediately initiated to repair the line. The repair work was completed by the end of that week, and Westminster Avenue was fully restored to traffic shortly thereafter. Staff requested that the Boards ratify their action in issuing purchase orders for the emergency repairs, including collection of the spilled sewage, pipe repair, replacement of materials, traffic control , and repair of the roadbed, in a total amount not to exceed $100,000. Joint Chairman Catlin complimented the Districts' staff for the efficient manner in which this incident was handled. Ratifying action of staff in Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ts—suing emergency purchase orders for Re airs to No. 1 Seal Beach That the Board of Directors hereby Force Main, ont%ct No. -13R ratifies the action of staff in issuing emergency purchase orders in a total amount not to exceed $100,000.00 for Repairs to No. 1 Seal Beach Force Main, Contract No. 3-13R. \./ -26- (REVISED) 04/11/90 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman ^. then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m. , April 11, 1990. DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Sewer Service Agreement with the County of Orange relating That the Boards of Directors hereby o edication o permanent and adopt Resolution No. 90-34, approving em orar easemen s for Contract Sewer Service Agreement with the No. 4-1- Acce tin Grants of County of Orange relating t0 the Easements an authorizing Quitclaim dedication of permanent and temporary Deeds to the county of urange easements for the construction and operation of the Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2; accepting Grants of Easements at no cost to the Districts; and authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deeds to the County of Orange, quitclaiming the Districts' South Irvine Trunk to be used to serve John Wayne Airport, and the MacArthur Trunk, scheduled to be abandoned. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, a and den c am o Pacific Bel re ontract o. 14-1-18 That the claim of Pacific Bell dated March 14, 1990, in an estimated amount of $10,000.00 for alleged damages to buried cable incurred during construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements), Contract No. 14-1-1B, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m., April 11, 1990. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering nnexation No. 130 Char tier Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-35-7, ordering annexation of 3.079 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity east of the intersection of Orange Park Boulevard and Meads Avenue in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 130 - Chartier Annexation). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing n a ono grocaealngs re eroposeC AnnexaFon That the Board of Directors hereby NO. - quisling Annexation- adopts Resolution No. 90-36-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 5.71 acres to the District located in the vicinity of Lemon Heights ^ and Lower Lake Drive in unincorporated County territory (proposed Annexation 1,�J No. 137 - Quisling Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -27- (REVISED) 04/11/90 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation and authorizing That the petition from James Gable, initiation of proceedings re Wilfred Taylor and Ethel Lathrum proposed Annexation No. 138 - Gable requesting annexation of 2.905 acres Annexation of territory to the District in the vicinity south of the intersection of Cowan Heights Drive and Overhill Drive in unincorporated County territory, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-37-7, authorizing intiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 138 - Gable Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Actions re Final Report and Recommendations of Ad Hoc Committee re Study of Unsewered Properties Within and Adjacent to Count Tani ation District No. 7 Verbal Committee report Committee Chairman, Don E. Smith, reported that after several years of study, many meetings and extensive written and verbal communications with property owners in unsewered Orange Park Acres, Lemon Heights and Cowan Heights within and adjacent to District No. 7, it was the consensus of the Committee that the majority of the property owners did not wish to incur the expense of constructing sewer lines in their areas at this time. The Ad Hoc Committee has therefore recommended that the District abandon any project for sewering the areas at this time. The Committee's recommendations also include continued preliminary engineering studies and planning for a future area-wide sewer construction program. Receive, file and approve Final Moved, seconded and duly carried: Report and Recommendations of Ad Hoc Committee re Study of That the Final Report and Unsewered Properties Within and Recommendations of Ad Hoc Committee Adjacent to County Sanitation re Study of Unsewered Properties District No. 7 Within and Adjacent to County Sanitation District No. 7, dated March 29, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:33 p.m. , April 11, 1990. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -28- (REVISED) FUND NO ( ,99 - JY DIST WOPKING-CAPITAL PROCESSING D'ATF 3/07/9A FADE REPORT NUMBER AP43 . _ .. .. _ . ... ...._.. .... ._.... _ . _ ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF. ORANGE...000NT7 _. _ . . .. ._... ._. CLAIMS PAID 03/14/911 POSTING DATE 03/14/90 .WARRANT N0. _._.. .—.____._.... VENDOR . .. ._.. _._ ._. AMOUNI .. DESCRIPTION 105423 ADMIRAL ROOFING 35050.00 ROOF REPAIRS _.1Q5424 AD.Y.ANC,ER_DFF I CE SERVICES.._...... ..... _ .. . .. .. ....S 74O.U3. ... _.... ._. .. OFFICE-EQUIPMENT _. ....._....._................... 105425 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. 354,098.23 CONSTRUCTION P1-25,26,P2-32,34 105426 ALTA SALES, INC. $352.70 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ". _ ..._.. 105427 ._.__..._...ANE8 ICAN..CASL I MG..S_COyM,...__ . ._.. ...___ .._.. .._.. 3223r23._.__ ...___ . ... .. FITTINGS.... __......... .........._._ _....... ...._ 10542E AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY S59.00 SUBSCRIPTION 105429 BOSCO INC. $/OR AMERICAN SEALS $5055.01 GASKETS $1.655.96 _____._..OFFICE..SUPPLIES________.______. 105431 AMERICAN HATER WORKS ASSOC. $377.40 PUBLICATION 105432 ANAHEIM CONVENTION CENTER $5,797.54 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT NOTICES A.ADS_____.._..__._._..___..__........... 105434 APPLE ONE 1940.83 TEMPORARY SERVICES 105435 APPLIED RESEARCH 6 TECHNOLOGY 3891.25 INSTRUMENT '• _...__..1 OS93fi.______6RA.TEZ.3ERYICES,._INC.aT_.___ ... .._.. _._._3109.97__ ._._____ .__.UNIFORMS _ .__.___.�_....... . .. 105437 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,241.50 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 105438 ASSOCIATED WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $156.19 INSTRUMENT PART " ._ ...._.... IQ5439._.___.F.ALCON_DIflPOSAL_SEB.VICL____.. _.__. .. _..,._.. .__.._..586,U91.22—__.—..._.__.___....._._.GRIT.REMOVAL_H.G.1v13-88_..__._._......_.._... 305440 BANK OF AMERICA S25.39 BANK CARDS 205441 P.W. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. $6.060.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-2,P2-37 IQ 5442.._—.—..PAXI E"CI CNII F.IS.-PP9DUCT.3__ _.__._.....__ __.. _. .....S2..019.42.._______. _........__.___.LAB..SUPPLIES__._----_______._..._._._ ". 105443 BELL L NOVELL CO. $381.00 PRINTER REPAIR !, ,d 105444 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS $217.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES S302.57.._------___ _._—.__..RADIATO"KPATR___..___. 105446 BREA PRINTING $1.668.13 PRINTING 105447 BRENNER-FIEDLER L ASSOC.. INC. S80.43 VALVES ' _ _.__. 105445RR UHINEE_ELE07R IC..___. _�. _ _.S50Z.87..___._._____._.__. ._..ELECTRIC_REPAIRS.__.__. ...._._. .. .__..__.._ 105450 BUILDING NEWS, INC. $43.84 PUBLICATION 105450 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE 380.01 PUBLICATION 105451 .._. _... . ..._.BURKE.ENGINEEBING_CO,_ ._. $86.37. _ ._.._..... __._. ..ELECTRIC-SUPPLIES,—.. .__.. ._._ .._.. .... .. 105452 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $5,691.00 SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-71 105453 GARY G. STREED $1,685.08 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT .. IC 5454__...__.__.....BUILEB_PAFER_COMPA.NT__.__ ._ _._...... _. _ _..,.t221.53.._ . ...__.. __.. . . _ OFFICE,SUPPLIES...___ __ 105455 INC MOBILE SPEEDOMETER S78.06 SPEEDOMETER REPAIR 105456 CPT CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS $29,119.62 CPT COMPUTER HARDWARE 105457 _ CAL-GLASS.FOB RESEARCH, INC.. . . S235.56 . . . . . LAB SUPPLIES_._.. ._._.. ... __.. _. .. 165450 CALTPOL , INC. 311,534.15 REGULATOR PARTS 'j 105459 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $1.078.32 GATE REPAIRS .. . ... 105469 _._ CALIE, .REGIONAL-WATER_OVALITY._ ._ 12,303.00 ._ FILING.FEES... _.__._... .__.._._.._ ..... __..._, '.I 105461 CAPITAL WESTWARD $913.14 REGULATORS 105462 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS S154,611.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34,P1-20,P1-36 ID5463 .. ._.. CHARLES. W. CARTER-CO.,. $428.09 HYDRAULIC.REPAIRS.. _ 1J5464 CASE POWER 6 EOUIPMENT $489.42 MECHANICAL PARTS 105465 CASTLE CONTROLS, INC. t261.97 VALVE 105466 ... ... A.W...CHESTERTON CO. $4,37P..73 PACKING MATERIALS 305967 CHEVRON U.S.A.• INC. S13,504.23 UNLEADED GASOLINE 105468 C.I.E.S. , CO. , INC. 17.13.00 GEARS/CHAIN •n FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST VORRINF CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/07/90 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ,I . _. . _.. _. .. COUNTY SAMITA710M DISTRICTS OF ORANGE. COUNTY ._. __. .. ---------- ! CLAIMS PAID 03/14/90 POSTING DATE 03/14/90 WARRANT NO. . . . _ .._ _____ ._..VENDOR . . AMOUNT _ _. DESCRIPTION. ._. _._ .. _ . 105469 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $1.435.00 SEAL REPAIRS ° ...__.. 105170_____.CORNELL_ G.M. PARTS../ .DIV.___ ... ._ . . _.._... . ._ ._ S158.A0 ..__. _.__. .._ _ .. . TRUCK_PARTS_._.____.___._._..__. _. 105471 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $5.091.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 105472 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $6,194.37 CHLORINE N.O.10-11-87 ' _____105473 .-__.--CONTINENTAL_0.1 SC•-CORP.. _........ ..... _._. ..____.__.. _f249.24..____ ._—. ... __._..__DISCS 105474 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $2.741.44 BLUEPRINTING N.O.7-12-89 105475 COOPERVISION SURGICAL $760.55 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 105476-______...COSTA .M ESA_AUTO_SUEPLY_._ . ... . . .... .. __ ... $12.13_._._.__._ ._._ . ._.__TRUCK. PARTS._.—__�._.__.. .......___._.._. ...... 105477 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL $1,850.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 105470 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.850.33 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES '1 .._..105479_.___.CRANE_.Y.E.YOR -CORP..___..........___. ... ..___.___ __ ....._11r566.41L_ . ___.._____ _..._..HARDWARE_.__.. _ — .._._.. ... ._.__ 1054B0 CAL WATER S190.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 105483 CURLEY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S290.86 LIGHTING '._.._.__.105462 .____SIATE_DAAAD_OF_.EQUALIZATION.__..... .......__..._5404.25. ._. .__.._.__ ______e/SARDOUS.WASTESAX__.__. ..._.. ...._.. _.._. 105483 DAILY PILOT $36.00 NOTICES A ADS 105484 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE S5r077.65 TIRES STAN_OEYERHAN_____ ____._.__._..__.. —__.__..f1 r000.00 ____ —.._.BROCHURE_SERYICES__..____.__..__...__..._.. 105486 DICKSONS $198.07 ELECTRIC PART PI 105487 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $21.25 PRINTING 10540R_ DOB ADO_.ENT ERPR I SES9._14C.__ .__._.____._.___...__SL 827.08__ ._____.—____...PLANE MAINTENANCE_&_REFIARS_._._..._.__. 105489 DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC. $295.38 PUMP PARTS N 105490 JOSEPH S. DUOOR, P.E. 1780.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES . 305491—_..___DUNKEL_BROS,_KACN MOVING_. ._. __. ...._..__.._..._ ...f2,550.00__. _—___ _ __._. -STORAGE ctuRcef...,t-19____. . _..... . .. . y 105492 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 111,092.14 PAINT SUPPLIES N 105493 EMA SERVICES. INC. S16.742.09 CONSULTING SERVICES J-23-2 105494. _. ____—EASTNAN._IMC._.____.___._.._. _._.__. .... _____.S2,Oil.61 105496 ENCHANTER,Sr INC. - $4,240.00 OCEAN MONITORING H.0.6-I4-B9 � 105196 ENCHANTER, INC. 54,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING N.0.6-IO-87 105497.._.. .__._._FACILITIES_SUCPORT_CO-------.. . . _. ._ __..._. ... s1.986.24_._..___ _ . .TOOLSIINSTRUMENT-PARTS-____ 105998 JONN 8. FALKE NSiEIN P.E. 53,607.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-6.J-20 105499 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $82.00 AIR FREIGHT ..__ __..105500 105501 FISCHER i PORTER CO. 9232.27 PLUMBING PARTS L05502 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. S4,991.63 LAB SUPPLIES ...._.. .105503 __.. _GELBER._PUMPS. . INE..._..._._.__. .... .. ... .319046.53_.. _ . PUMP PARTS.. .. ........._... 10550 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA .00 FILM ' I05505 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $1 ,040048.00 SEWAGE CLEANUP PEE .... .105506 .___. .FOUNTAIN. VALET PAINT _ _.. . .... S119.81 _ .. ._ _ .. PAINT SUPPLIES 105507 FOUNTAIN VALLEY TRANSIT MIX $300.69 BUILDING MATERIALS 105509 FOX ENTERPRISES 21,825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 105509 .. FOXBORO CO. ./.MAG SYSTEMS . $854.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS _.. . M' 105510 FRAZEE PAINT i WALLCOVERING $104.23 PAINT 105511 FREDERICK PUMP i ENGINEERING S1,736.75 PUMP PARTS . _. 105512 ._. ... _.._..CITY OF__FULLERTON .. . $34.45 . . .. WATSR.USEAOE, _.. . _._.. ... _. 105513 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,319.34 BUILDING MATERIALS • 105514 GEIGER BROS. /VEST $857.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES i4 FUND NO ■ 39 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING OATE 3/07/99 PAGE 444 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY_.SANITATION DISTRICTS OF.,ORANGE_000NTY .,__. _ __....,. � - CLAIMS PAID 03/19/90 POSTING DATE OS/14/90 .I WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT _ DESCRIPTION_...._._. .__ —.._..___._ . •i 105515 GEM-O-LITE PLASTICS CORP. $357.88 BUILDING MATERIALS IQ5516 GENERAL_TELEPHONE._CO. _ _ _. _ ,. _ S1 pA92.?I TELEPHONE SERVICES_____��__ ._.__._.._ 'I 155517 TOM GERLINGER S359.76 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE ^� 105518 GIERLICH-MITCHELL. INC. S15.696.97 MECHANICAL PARTS .. .... . ...... . 117,7.57.59 ..... .. _._._... .. .SURVEYING_SFRVICES,RES._88-.72_.— •I_ ._--_ 305519.._._..__...._DOM 0R_EEK_.E._ASS OC IA7 E.S____, ,,,.. . _.__... .......... . ^I 105521 HACH COMP INC. $ $142.54 MEDICAL EVALUATION 105522 HARK COMPANY 5192.59 LAB SUPPLIES 105522 _ HAIt R1 N6TON INDUSTRIALPLASTICS _ ._.S2.713 .03___.,. 105523 HAUTE NIflN. INC.. f3.967.95 MECHANICAL PARTS 105524 MARTE-HANKS COMMUNICATIONS INC $3,965.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 105525 HEKIMIAN S ASSOC.r_INC__.__—__.._.___.__.______._. 105526 E.G. HE ILER•S SON. INC. $487.59 TOOLS 105527 HEWLETT-PACKARD $1,590.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION _ . __...105528MYLES S. HIGASHIMURA___.. ..._. . $1.6.58 . _NILEACe E%PHNSE___._ . 105530 LINRA HIRE NES $181.79 LIABILITY SETTLEMENT 305550 HOER B76ER C.Y.S. CALIF. s INC. E181.79 COMPRESSOR PARTS _105531. HOUSE OF_BATTERIES.__.— _._Sj 7¢.BS _._ _ T3.EAERTE9-__—____,_ _ 305552 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $2.438.91 SAFETY SUPPLIES bl 105533 HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO $29.859.33 TEST EQUIPMENT '.__._,__105534 CITY of HUNT INGTON_BEACIL___________ _____i1Z..1¢_ __WATER USEACE 105535 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP S122.31 RUBBER STAMPS H 205536 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL S56.617.33 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-08-89 105537 INDUSTRIAL THREADED ^ ? 1G553S INGRAM PAPER $1,163.07 PAPER w 1D5539 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT S19.47 WATER USEAGE GREAT WESTERN SANITARYSUPP. S418,66 _JANITORIAL SUPPLIES_ 105541 JENS6N 1N5TRUMENTS CO. S948.72 INSTRUMENT 105542 JENSEN TOOLS E ALLOYS S324.70 TOOLS 105543JOYCE OFFICE PRODUCTS _ __ .. 3_}24 205544 KALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $1,859.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 105545 KAMAN BEARINGS A SUPPLY $10,859.23 FITTINGS/PULLEYS __ _..105546_._..... -__ KANER COMPANT $953.57.___...._._..______-_____T.OULS(MRBNARE__._-_..__-_._—_—____..__._ 105547 KING BEARING. INC. $834.24 MACHINE SUPPLIES 105548 LINDBERG $70.01 ELECTRIC PART _ _105549._____ __,, .LINCOLN CENTER_MDBJLE HOME__. . . .$5.3¢5.26 REPUND_USERPEE.OVERP.AYMENT______,.. 105550 N.P. LI NOSiRON. INC. S10.640.05 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.10-14-87 105551 LOS ANGELES TIMES $22.44 NOTICES 6 ADS .105552____., NBC_APPLIED_ENVIRONMENTAL _. _ . ._ ,_ .. .. _ S29528.10 _ OCEAN.MONITDRING.____ . ..____-__. _........__. 109953 ROT B10L06IC COMPANY a57H.61 LAB SUPPLIES 105554 MPS $389.15 PNOTOGRAHIC SERVICES ... __ _. 105555__ HACONCO__ $315.03_ SERVICE AGREEMENT,_.._ 105556 WAIN FRApE SERVI LFS 31.512.00 COMPUTER REPAIRS 105557 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $250.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTMENT SERVICES DIST 2 105558 _____..__ _MARVAC. ELECTRONICS _ _ S19.27_ _ _ INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 105559 MATT - GM LOR• INC. $I .922.95 ELECTRIC PARTS 105560 MIKE MCCARTHY $280.94 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/07/90 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 __. . _ _.. .._, ____. _........, ... ._. COUNTY. SANITATION DISTRICTS, OF. ORANGE COUNTT . . . .. _ ... _. . .___.._._. ...__ .___._.._.._.._. CLAIMS PAID 03/I4/90 POSTING DATE 03/14/94 ' _ _..WARRANT..NO.. VENDOR. __...___ . .. ._ ._. AMOUNT._. _...... . ___.__ . . .. _.._ ._ DESCRIPTION___.._. . .. -------- 105561 MCKENNA THOR. S EQUIP. $545.61 PUMP PARTS _..___.._.._HEAD Sl.E.8KAGING 10556] MEAD PACKAGING 1526.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 105564 MERCK S CO., INC. $35.00 PUBLICATION OFFICE..MACHINE 105566 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. $59.51 PIPE SUPPLIES 105567 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $86.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _._._ 105566.— ..32,.115. 105569 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $670.41 TRANSDUCER ' 205570 MORGAN CRANE CO.r INC S182.00 HYDRAULIC REPAIRS . .__3.055I1_ .tlOS 17Lf➢LNORY____.—_____.._ ____ _. 32,806.53_._ _._.___. ....... 105572 MORTON SALT AND/OR $440.45 SALT 105573 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. $641.72 MECHANICAL PARTS .___1055I5 NALI.ON.AL VISUAL $63.8.5. —.SIGO SUPPLIES 105576 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS 726.75 SIGN SUPPLIES "^ 1OS576 MEAL SUPPLY CO. $726.75 oIL "_..—_J➢55Z2_— NEYJ1.EEtlE.S,J NL..____ _ ---------$265.5fl____._._.___�—.__OPFICe_SUPPLIES—...________.__.___... ?' 105578 SY NIELSON SERVICE , INC. $132.50 LAB SERVICES .' Ly 205579 NORTH SUPPLY $235.56 COMPUTER PARTS •'_�____195581 .OLE LEE, INC_YI3J.RN. SAYETID TRUCK •• ti IC4581 OLE LEG INC. $92,332.13 FLATBED TRUCK M.0.6-14-89 •_ H 109582 DR SYSTEMS CO. S191,320.30 CHLORINE H.0.2-14-90 • H 305583_._ 889N0E�EAAf.NOzINC�—_—_—.__.—_.__._._A441.21__—_..—______.. Y-BELTS _ '." 2. 105584 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. S139.50 TRUCK PARTS 105585 ORANGE VALVE S FITTING CO. S449.50 FITTINGS ._.__105587_. COUNTY ..OFORAE—____—_..____.._____. _..._._._$4,850.04________—__._—DPECIALOCESSBES_SE__.__.._.___.._____. .. .. _ 305507 COUNTY OF ORANGE � 39r 850.00 DATA PROCESSING BERVICES 105588 COUNTY OF ORANGE $450.00 MAPPING .__. A10.d2T•53._.____._____....__. ._._REIMSVRSE_WORKER'S.COMP.INSURANCE.__..._. 105590 PACIFIC DATA CON SYSTEMS $210.96 ELECTRIC PARTS 105591 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $1,207.46 SAFETY SUPPLIES 105599 ._...._P AC I FIC Of LL_____ ___... .... ._._..___..___.._ _ __._.___.328.f 29., .._.__.. ....__._____TELEPHONE_SERVICES___...___._ 105593 PACIFICA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL $4,513.48 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 105594 PAUL-MUNROE HYDRAULICS S1r156.65 PUMP _,105595 __. P1HA_¢R O_Sj3]EM$r. INC _ ... _._ .. .. . . .$ORr537.15„ SLUDGE. REMOVAL_M.0 $ 105596 POLYPURE, INC. S35,942.08 POLYMERS M.0.1-10-90 8 9-89 105597 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS $1,790 56 OFFICE MACHINE 1D559R ......._._. .HAROLD_PRIMROSE __ _..... ... ...___ S72.00 ... _ .. .._.. ICE__.. •M 105599 PROFESSIONAL TREE CARE $2,650.00 TREE TRIMMING ++� 305600 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. S4,876.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION H.0.8-30-88 +°I 105601 . . _ _ . P U L B AF E E D E 0. ... . _ . . $515.76 _ PUMP PART. .. 105602 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. SIU,958.63 PUMP PARTS l ,l 105603 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $911.40 TRASH REMOVAL 105609_ RFCY,C,_..IN9,__._,. _ ., ,. _ $52,440.00 _ SLUDGE REMOVAL, M•05I 1-88.___. ....,. _ .. I 105605 RED WING SHOES $101.11 SAFETY SHOES d IC5606 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $1,012.54 ELECTRIC MOTOR FUND NO l 99 JT GIST WOPAING .CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/07/91) PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 ...,._.._ . ... __........._._.._..._..._______ .._ ._... . ._COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .._ _._ ..... CLAIMS PAID 43114190 POSTING DATE 03/19/9U WARRANT. NO._. ... . . . ...._..__.__.. .. VENDOR .. .. . _... . _. .. .,. AMOUNT. . . _ DESCRIPTION . _.. .... 105607 THE REGISTER 990.00 SUBSCRIPTION .__...._10A60B .........._.......BEM EQY._TEMP_.__.___ ._.._._.._. .. ._ _ ... .......... _.._. f557.70... ... ..__. ... _...__ TEMPORARY.SERVICES.._....___..___.____.._ .... 105609 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. S965.57 HARDWARE 1D5618 REMOLD POWER TRANSMISSION S149.24 MECHANICAL PARTS _...... .105611 ._..............__.._J•_B A..AOBER TS. CORP..__.._._. ...._. $471081.95 ....... .. _. . .._. CONSTRUCTION...U-7-4,J-20 _._._._ . ........ 105612 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC f345.31 LAB SUPPLIES 105613 RYAN-XERCO $16.38 FREIGHT (._ .... .. 105619 5KE_VE S.T. ._.._.. ._. ,.f 238.98...____ .. ...._. _._...._. LAB SUPPLIES_..._ .._ ...._----_..___.__... 105615 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. S66.40 PARTS CLEANER 105616 SANTA FE BAG CO. $197.90 BUILDING MATERIALS ___....,.IOSb1Z $0 LE xQF_A.PPL.I CAT.A.0NS...INT.!L.__. .. . .. 00EAN.MONITORING..M.O.6e14=84___._,____._ .. 105618 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,979.29 OFFICE MACHINE/FURNITURE 105619 SEARS. ROEBUCK t CO. $926.12 TOOLS TOOLS _-_._...._. _....__..._._....._.__. _.___ 105621 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $2.650.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS 105622 SLIDE MAKERS WEST $81.66 PRESENTATION AIDS "_.. 305623.___..—_ SLIDE.MASTER_._.__.___ __.___._..._..._..__._......_...._._;94..56_....._._ ......-.-_...____. ._PRESENTATION.AIDS...__._.___._,__..__._.. __...... 105624 SMITH-EMERY CO. SI.730.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 " t» 105625 SMITH PIPE B SUPPLY. INC $262.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES .• _105624____—SNAP_-oy_IW4LS_£QNP, _._..... _......__ .. $233.92.__.. ------- _.._____._ . .TOOLS_ ._ __...._... _ _.__.._..._ .._..._.._. 105627 SOFT WAREHOUSE $146.63 COMPUTER PARTS 105628 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY f15.549.9U APPLICATION FEES 'r-a._.._.105629_._.____.S.OUIN_CAA.S LSE A__EODDS_TNC•.._.._____ .__�. ._.. .. ..........f 4.59.35...__—.._...___.__.. REF.UND..USER_FEE.OVERPAYMENT._.__ ...__.._.._. ^ 105630 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $5,654.92 POWER 105631 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 35.730.77 DIESEL FUEL _ .$2,271.63 ... WELDING-SUPPLIES.._... ._..__._._...—.____._...._._.__. 105633 SPECTRUM CONSULTANS t SYSTEMS Y $1,922.38 CONSULTING SERVICES - FLEET MNGMHT SYS. 105634 STAR TOOL t SUPPLY CO. $1,478.33 TOOLS $2,969.97 _. ...__—.__._.____ _STEEL. . ..........._.__, ..___.__._.._ ....._.. ._..__ 105636 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE t MAINT. $405.00 CONTRACT LANDSCAPING M.0.8-9-89 105637 SUPELCO. INC. $861.79 LAB SUPPLIES '... . . . . .105638 _ __...._. .SUPEB_CIIEM. CORD. __ _ _ _... _.._...._. . _ .. _. f913.75.._ _ _.__ ..._- CHEMICALS_..._._._.._ . 105639 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $6,545.33 TOOLS/HARDWARE .I 105640 7.A.S.A. OF ARIZONA $875.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 105641 ._ TAYL00-PUNN . ..._..._ .---- _ .. .. .. .. $442.37 .. . . ELECTRIC CART PARTS _.. ?I 105692 TXER NE TRTCS-HAVER IC CORP. 5187.81 INSTRUMENT 105643 THOMPSON LACQUER CO. S1.384.72 PAINT _.. 10564A .._____3T_EOUIPMENT_ COMPANY.. _ _._ _ _ i89.74 ..._ _ .. TOOLS__ _.. "1 105645 TRURO t ASSOC. 524.00 GROUNDING SURVEY 105646 TILLINGHAST $130.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - INSURANCE 105697. _.. _ . TINKER„ CONTROL _ _ ., _. 5296.76 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 105645 TRAFFIC SERVICE. INC. $131.60 ROAD SIGN RENTAL r 105649 TRAVEL TRAVEL $882.50 TRAVEL SERVICES _105650 _,__... ._.TRUCN_t_AUTO SUPPL,YL .LNC. 11,626.82 TRUCK,PARTS ._. . .. 105651 J.C. TUCKER t SON, INC. $464.16 INSTRUMENT 105652 UNOCAL 1174.83 GASOLINE ,i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORXING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/07198 PACE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 --COUNTY. SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE..COUNTY _._ . ....__ ... ... . . .. CLAIMS PAID 03/14/90 POSTING DATE 03/14/90 .._ WARR A NT-g0.__. .. _._.__. ._.VENDOR . . ..._ AMOUNT .. .. _..._ .... _ _. DESCRIPTION _....._ ._._ .._.. 1' 105653 THE UNISOURCE CORP. $249.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES .. 105654 . . _ ..._._.UNITED.. CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY _.. .. S1,818.09 _ .. . . . .... REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT-------- 165655 UNITED ELECTRIC SUPPLY S1.317.05 ELECTRIC FITTINGS 105656 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $56.56 PARCEL SERVICES " _ ._. 105657 ... -ELEVATOR -COMPANY--. . _..._. .. .. .. _..._ _5326.15.. __.... .. _.. ... . _-MAINTENANCES CONTRACT ------- --_-- - 105658 US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE S55.00 SUBSCRIPTION n 105659 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.826.10 LAB SUPPLIES 105660._ ._._.._._...VALLEY_CIT.I.ES_.SUPPLY_.C.O------.__..___.. _ . ._ ..... . ._ .$4.527.51._. . . . _. . ... _ . .-PIPE 6 FITTINGS---_._....... ...____..____.. -- ... 105661 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY f806.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES 105662 VILLAGE NURSERIES $82.63 GROUNDCOVER _._ 105663- _._ODOR-.CONTROL-CONSULTANT-..__.. .-. 105664 CARL WARREN S CO. $178.22 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADJUSTER 108665 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $30.00 PERMIT FEE .__IO5666___.IME_WASER_HAN_._...� __...___._______._. .. _f135..97._—.—___ ____REFUND-USER FEE..OVERPAYMENT----.--- --- 105667 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE $82.80 GUARD SERVICES 105668 WESTERN CANNERS. INC. $245.28. REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT " _. .-._.105669..____ ___....YES IERN_.HIGHWAY_.RROOUCTS._.IN[..._...____.__ .. ....... ....__._f260.0A. --- ._.._____..-_.SAFETY.SIGN-..-_..... ......._..-___—_ _.__.. 105670 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY S37.614.56 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89 X 105671 WORDPERFECT CORP. S568.43 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 105672_______WORKERS I_C ONE ENSATION._CO._._______ .__......... pr 105673 XEROX CORP. $6,216.34 COPIER LEASES y 105674 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES $1,549.97 INSTRUMENT PART _ 105675 .E.VERETL11 a...Y.OR N_.CA. ..._._.___.._SS12.O L .. ENGINE. PART_ 105676 YOflX INTERNATIONAL S40 ELECTRIC PARTS - TOTAL CLAIMS P I IMS PAID 03/19/90 $1,8 60.955.37 -es e _�..... SUMURY. _ .. .__._ . .._._ __ ._. _ .. . .AMOUNT._.. . -. .__. /2 OPER FUND = 5.159.27 02CAP FAG FUND- .._._. __ _....__,__._._. ... _ .,.. . __ _ . .. 4,99176 13 OPER FUND 12,017.08 ,i 03 CAP FAC FUND 66.52 05 OPER FUND _ _._._ .__.____ _ .. .... . ._ ____. ___ .. ... 1,442,11 _._ .. ._._.... _ ._.... . . _ _. .__..__._.._._. ...__. u 25 CAP FAC FUND 1,693.28 07 OPER FUND 12,114.43 07 CAP PAC FUND- .__._. ___. ._ __ .._.._. _. . .. .. 3,676,87 .. OIL OPER FUND 204.16 01l CAP FAC FUND 108.53 014 OPEN FUND _ _. .__ ._.. _. 19.47 014 CAP FAC FUND 9.680.63 0566 OPEN FUND 1,816.88 H'i-- 9566 CAP FAC-FUND-.._ . _...__._ .__ ._. . ... ..._.... .... . .. .. I0:40 1667 OPER FUND 2,273.79 "-� 07614 OPER FUND 472.53 JT DIST OPER FUND - - 794,025,17 CORD 841.358.48 SELF FUNDI KER'S COMP INSURANCE FUND„ 11,006.37 -JT DIST Wo - . , CAPITAL FUND - 158.317.64 - f1,860,455.37 FUND NO ( 9 JT DIST WORKING COITAL PROCESSING•DATE 3/22/90 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITA71ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY i1 CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/28/90 WARRANT NO. - VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION i' 105694 A S G INDUSTRIES S27.593.13 DEWATERING EQUIPMENT ...,. 105695 AAA-TRUCK-BODY....... ... ..... ...... . ._ . -_. .... .. 61.932.98. -_ TRUCK PARTS 105696 AT 0 T $306.57 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE 395697 ACCESSORIE AIR COMPRESSOR SYS. $1,229.45 COMPRESSOR PARTS 105698 ---- ...ADYANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC - - -- f747.B54.60 - CONSTRUCTION J-15 - - 'I 105699 AIR PRODUCTS L CHEMICAL INC. $15.296.00 OXYGEN GENERATION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 105700 AIRGUARO INDUSTRIES. INC $325.73 FILTERS 109701 LEASING-ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE---- - ----- $1,293.32 - - - ------ AUTOMOBILE LEASING - 105702 ALPHAGA2 S699.25 GASES n 105703 ALTA SALES, INC. 1166.55 GAUGE 105704 _._...___. AMER ICAN._FLEET PARTS.----.__---....---.-- ....__...._..... .. . .... . . $22.25 . .... .... . _. . .. _ .. TRUCK PARTS - " 105705 ROSCO INC. 1/OR AMERICAN SEALS $4,499.30 CASKETS l" 105706 AMERITECH S97.75 COPIER LEASES ip 105707 - -------- ANAHEIM SEWER-CONSTRUCTION--- ------... ..__.._-.._...._.:..... 13.026.00 -- - - - MANHOLE REPAIRS DIET 11 - - 105708 A-PLUS SYSTEMS f2.138.86 NOTICES 6 ADS 1P5709 APPLE ONE S895.36 TEMPORARY SERVICES ' 1 05 710--------ARATEX-SERVICES.- INC.---------- --- 64.981.73--- --- UNIFORM RENTALS--_._.._.._. 105711 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD.. INC $147.56 BUILDING MATERIALS •� 105712 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $5,020.00 SOIL TESTING H.O.6-14-89 -- 105713- -ATOMIC-SPECTROSGOPT --=----- f40.00---------SUBSCRIPTION-------- - - - ---- - 105714 AUTODESK. INC. $1.920.50 COMPUTER SOFTWARE m 105715 AWAROSSTROPHTES S52.54 SERVICE AWARDS 105716 --- -_.._._....FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE------- ---------- --- - $48,724.60 --- - - -------- GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-86 - - - 1p 105717 BANK OF AMERICA-C.A.S.C. S8.084.06 C.O.P. ADMINISTRATIVE PEE 1 105718 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $294.20 REGULATION PUBLICATIONS 105719 --.—._._,.._P..W.-BAROT7I-AND-ASSOC.-----.------- -- -14.740.00 --------••-- CONSTRUCTION SERVICESPI-34-16202-37.J-24 1D5720 8. BATEMAN . $565.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION' 105721 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2,470.91 LAB SUPPLIES "- .. 10%722 --_...___..BISHOPIS-SANITARP-MAINT.-SUPP.-.------- S302.81- --- - ---- -_.....JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 195723 HOWARD BLEVINS S200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 105724 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $346.00 RADIATOR REPAIR 305725_ -.B ON M-RUES-.-......_._-.__—....._.... _.--__-___ .___5262.19 PARTS .... ... 105726 BROWN 1 CALDWELL $4,910.75 LAB SERVICES H.D.3-8-89 105T27 BROWN B CALDWELL CONSULTING f1.546.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 89-45 105728..__.._._.___ - �STEY E-RUB ALO CONSTRUCTION-CO.-- 3715.073.90--- - CONSTRUCTION-14-1-18 - 105729 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $2,393.50 MECHANICAL PARTS 105730 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $2,616.09 SURVEYING RES 88-71 105731 -_.__.._._, GARY-G. STREED - -- - _.. .._ . _.. __ .._.. .. 9406.71 - - - --. PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 105732 BYPRODUCTS MANAGEMENT. INC. $33,653.24 FERROUS CHLORIDE M.0.4-12-89 105733 CPT CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS $297.19 COMPRESSOR PARTS 105734 IS COMPANY._. . 1447.10 MECHANICAL PARTS 105735 1990 CWPCA CONFERENCE f1029.OD CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 105736 CAL-CHEM SALES $48.70 HARDWARE A05737-._._.. .....CAL-GLASS-FOR,RESEARCH. INC. - - S1s169.74 LAB SUPPLIES - 105738 CALS CAMERA $153.07 VIDEO CASSETES 105739 CARLETON ENGINEERS $6,765.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES - AQMD MATTERS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/22/90 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _..._ . ...._ . .., _ ... ...... _.._..-.... ... .. _ ..COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/28/90 ' WARRANT NO. - - VENDOR ------ - - - - - - AMOUNT - DESCRIPTION 105740 CARMENITA FORD TRUCK SALES, IN S17.92 TRUCK PARTS ` 105741-------- JOHN--CAROLLO ENGINEERS - - - ---- - -- - $159,050.87 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36;P2-42;P1-34 105742 CHALLENGE BEARING S IND. SPLY $254.30 BEARINGS 105743 A.Y. CHESTERTON CO. $1,932.70 PACKING MATERIALS 1 _.._._..105744 -.-__.___,.--._._CHEVRON-U.S.A.,-INC,.—_.--._ ._...- ____.._ _.. ._._ . ._.. .S1,054.19 . ....... .. ...__ ..... OIL a 'GREASE . ... ._ ._ .. . 105745 CHROME CRANKSHAFT, INC. $390.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 105746 CLA-VAL COMPANY 950.00 VALVE 105 747---------CLOSSON -6--CLOSSON --------------------_-- - $1,946.50 ---- - - LANDSCAPE DESIGN - -' 105748 COLICH AND SONS $191.544.30 CONSTRUCTION 2-I1-3 105749 COMPUSERVE $10.00 SERVICE BUREAU CONN EL L-G.M.--P ART9-/- B1V._____..__.--__....__._-.......$623.87_.__ ._--.—___.... ... -TRUCK PARTS. . . 105751 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. S5,210.36 ELECTRIC PARTS 105752 CONTAINER12ED CHEMICAL DISPOSA $90.00 DRUM 105 753 --------^CONTINENTAL--GRAPHICS-- --- - - - S3,832.89--------------- BLUEPRINTING'M:0:7-12=89 105754 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 3317.68 TRUCK PARTS 105755 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S354.98 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 105756-----CREATIVE-SOREEN-ARTG--------_- -: -- f3,691.28--_------------SAFETY-SUPPLIE9-"-"' --'-- ' 105757 CAL WATER S200.50 RENTAL EQUIPMENT105758 " H---195759-----DANASTATEGORPORATIONNIA f313.92 --------_TRUCRNOTARYPART$------ ' m 105760 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $229.29 TIRES y 105761 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS 9171.02 BOXES 105762-- DEPENOA8LE-HIGHWAY-EXPRESS ----------f32.e 1----- _- --FREIGHT----------_..___...-.__ . .. .. 105763 DE20RIK AND/OR CS CO. $1,011.76 VALVE ' ro 105764 DICKSONS 1156.40 ELECTRIC PARTS 1 0 5 765-----.--DIFILIPPO-ASSOCIATES-- ------------$4,914.60 ---------------- O➢FICE SUPPLIES --_.-_._. __...._._. . 105766 DORADO ENTERPRISES* INC. $15,367.26 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 205767 GUNNEL BROS. MACH MOVING S2,800.00 EQUIPMENT MOVING - 105768---------DUNN-EDWAROS-CORP.-- ------ --- _...-.._.. ._._593.00----_------------ PAINT SUPPLIES- - "- 31 105769 DYYER INSTRUMENT, INC. $299.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS 105770 D•VALS SALES $28.69 PU14P PARTS 105771 E.I.L.-INSTRUMENTS, -INC.--- ----- - $98.12 - ---- ---- _- ------ ELECTRIC PART 105772 ENSECO-CRL 62,350.00 OCEAN SAMPLING 105773 EASTMAN, INC. $1,978.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES '^ 105779 - _... . .. V. -H..EBERT-CORP. --- ------- - -- - ----_... - 51.063,627.20 - - - -- - - CONSTRUCTION 2-26-2 10ST75 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY $74.38 PRESENTATION AID 105776 EDWARD L. ELLIOT, JR. $1.820.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES " _-.405777-..._.__ .__EMERY-WORLDWIDE...... ._._._.___.__.. . .__..-___..._. SI,268.20 - _ _ . ..- . . AIR FREIGHT 105778 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO. S2.594.60 MECHANICAL PARTS 105779 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. $684.46 TOOLS/MARDWARE 105780 - MARSHALL .FAIRRES - S350.00 DEFERRED COHP DISTRIBUTION 105781 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3,675.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES .]-7-4.J-20 105762 FAPR SALES 6 SERVICE $10.448.05 FILTER 105783 _.. _ ... ...FEDERAL.-EMPRESS CORP. -.-..... . .. _. S64.00 - AIR FREIGHT - 105784 FERRELLGAS $22.95 PROPANE 105785 ` FICO•S APPLIANCE SERVICE $49.90 VACUUM REPAIR \ FUND NO ( 19 - JT O13T YOR MI NG CAPITAL PROCESSING DAME 3/22/90 PAGE 1� REPORT NUMBER AP43 - - --- - - - - --- - - --- --- - - --- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - - - - CLAIMS PAID 03/26/90 POSTING DATE 03/2R/90 WARRANT NO. - -- VENDOR-- - __ - - -- -- AMOUNT - - DESCRIPTION 105786 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $294.48 c CHLORINATION PARTS � 105787- -----FISG HER-f-FOR TER CO. f2.975.37 INSTRUMeNT REPAIR - 105788 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 3327.25 LAB SUPPLIES 105789 FLAT & VERTICAL CONCRETE 9368.00 CONCRETE CUTTING 105790 -_-- -- FLEETYASH-SYSTEMS. INC. ---- --- - - - - - -- $738.29 -- - - - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 105791 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $9.25 FILM 105792 THE FOXBORO CO. f1.197.03 INSTRUMENT PART/ELECTRIC SUPPLIES -1 0 5 7 9 3--------- A.F.-FREY-------------^-- 3105.r00-- _._..__. ____ ....... DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION - 105794 DEC AUTOMATION PROJECTS. INC. 536.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 105795 GFS CHEMICALS $46.28 LAB SUPPLIES - -- 105196.— -----GTE-GA6IFORNIA.-INC.--- --f1.900.00 -- ------_ TEMP EASEMENT M.0.2-10-88 -" 105797 G4RRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,334.50 CHEMICALS - 105798 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 36.015.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES --_-105799 -------GIERLICH-MITCHELL.-ING. ------- ----911,570.19------ --------—-MECHANICAL PARTS----- - - - 105800 GOODALL $5.159.50 EXPANSION JOINT 105801 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION S2r600.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - - 105802--.----DON-GREEK-&-.ASSOCIATES--- ----------f6.99B.98=----------- ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 88-72-'- - 105803 HACH COMPANY $607.65 LAB SUPPLIES 105804 HARDWOOD CENTER $274.75 LUMBER " - -105805 --- -FRED-A.-HARPER --- ----- ------- ilt 995.00 -------_.___._.. __DEFERRED-COMP DISTRIBUTION m 105806 HATCH & HIRE. INC. 5690.63 MECHANICAL PARTS 305807 S. A. NEA LY CO. f89r753.23 CONSTRUCTION PI-35-1 " y 195809--- ----HOERBI GEL-G.V.B.-OA trFF.--.-ING.----- ----------- $268.60------------------COMPRESSOR-PARTS---- - - ,� 105809 DONALD D. HONOMICHL 330D.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 105810 HORIZON HIGH-REACH $1,104.02 TRUCK PARTS '� - - 105811 ------HOUSE-OF-BATTERIES— -----_._._.._._-..- $1.229.91---------- -BATTERIES- ---------- - -- - 105812 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $2.395.47 SAFETY SUPPLIES 105813 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $13.884.78 WATER USEAGE �� - - - 305814 .----_HUNTINGTON-SUPPLY--- ----- -------_-- - $131.67 - -_._____ _- _- HARDWARE 105815 IBM CORP/PC BOOKS & SPECIAL PR $121.19 BOOK 105816 ICC INSTRUMENT $75.98 . METER REPAIR _....105817- —ENERGY-SERVICES-GROUP------------- - --6304.06 ---- -- ---- ENGINE PARTS ---- '- -- -- - - - 105818 IMPER74L WEST CHEMICAL $94.661.55 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-08-89 105819 INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIF. $30,208.79 RETENTION RELEASE - COASTLINE COMET. 5-27 105820 - --- . - -INDU57RIAL THREADED PRODUCTS- - - - -- --- - $2.148.75 CONNECTORS 195821 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. f771.80 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 105822 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY f497.04 ELECTRIC PARTS - 305823 -- -- - JOYCE- OFFICE-PRODUCT& - - -- - 5708.31- OFFICE SUPPLIES "- 105824 KALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $621.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES 105829 RAMAN BEARINGS & SUPPLY 3854.10 FITTINGS 305826 KANER COMPANY - - - - $1,416.64 TOOLS 105P27 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 63.162.5U WORKERS COMP ADMINISTRATION FEE 105828 KENOKO. INC. $227.421.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-34 --- 305829 -- . _.._..-,KEN•S-OIL♦- INC. - - - - - - - - - $2.146.25 - WASTE OIL REMOVAL -- - 105830 KIEYIT PACIFIC CO. $78,057.80 CONSTRUCTION PI-31 105831 KING BEARING. INC. $563.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/22/90 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ,� ---- - - ---- -- -- COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/28/90 WARRANT NO. - --- - ------- VENDOR - ---- -- - AMOUNT - DESCRIPTION 105832 KNAPPI MARSH, JONES B DORAN $675.00 LEGAL SERVICES - IN ENFORCEMENT -- -- 105833""'-- - -"KNOX -INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES------ -' -' -- " -- - S685.89 - NEATER '-"- -' 305834 MARTIN KORDICKI SR S4.012.40 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES M.0.8-10-88 305835 H.V. LAWMASTER S CO., INC. S5.694.2C SOIL TESTING M.0.6-/4-89 105836- HOWARD LENORE-- ---- ---- - -- - - - $949,27 MEETING EXPENSE 305837 LE ROY CRANDALL 1 ASSOC. S4.830.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1058,,18 LEVCO ELECTRIC CO. $115.80 TRUCK REPAIRS "- --105839 -...__.---.LIGMTHOUSE.INC r-._..___.__._._... __ __..__._-_ _-. _ . ..__A123.58. ___ .. __. - MECHANICAL PARTS ... 105840 NBS/LOWRY $20,455.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.I1-08-89 105841 A.J. LYNCH CO. $84.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES --- -- 10 584 2-------M6C--APPLIED-ENVIRONMENTAL-_....._. .___.... _. _.._..-_$2,610.00 -"-- --_'---- -OCEAN MONITORING 305843 MOT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $293.52 TAB SUPPLIES 105844 MPS 310.63 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES - lOSB4S"-'-'----MAB-SY9 iEN3 5219s13- INSTRUMENT PART ., 105846 MALCOLM PIRNIE 4 INC• $28.013:54 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.7-12-89 305R47 MARSHALL MAINT. PRODUCTIONS 580 00 TRAINING VIDEO RENTALS -105848 --- -------NARVAC -ELECTRONICS'------ --- ___. ..... . _. _$06.71--""'---"'"- ""_' INSTRUMENT'SUPPLIES- 105849 MATT - CHLOR. INC. S459.00 ELECTRIC PARTS x 105850 LARRY W. MCLEMORE $29.58 MILEAGE EXPENSE m -105851 --- ---'-MICR OA6E-COMP UT ER-- ---T'--------------A1L 154.E Y---'------- - COMPUTER/SOFTWARE --- - '' 105852 MICROAGE COMPUTER STORES $470.02 COMPUTER SOFTWARE " 105853 14ITCHELL MANUALS. INC. $134.94 PUBLICATIONS H -105859 . . ..-....._..- ..NONTPOY-SUPPLY' CO r___._ -------- . __.__ ..___._. . . _._- 15b 95"'._. ..__-. .-... _. OFFICE SUPPLIES ._. . 105855 MOTOROLA, INC. $62,893.65 PAGERS H.0.2-14-90 109856 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN $35.93 PUBLICATIONS Li --105857_.-__-.-NATIONAL-tUMBER- ._---...__...-._._.._.-_..-..__._ $426-18 _ ..___...... ._.- ..... LUMBER_. -._.__. .. .. . . . . 105858 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES, INC. 1687.50 SEWER INSPECTIONS DIST 7 105859 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $199.43 HARDWARE 195860 ---------GUST-K.r-NEWBERG CONST. CO.----- -- S3.458.379.00- -"- -'- ---' CONSTRUCTION Ph33 105861 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $85.00 INSTRUMENT PART 105862 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5.96 WATER USEAGE - -----105863 - - ---------NDRTH SUPPLY ------------ - -$529.54 -- - -- --- - ' COMPUTER PARTS 105864 O.M.S./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO S11489.00 TRASH BIN REMOVAL 105865 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES S510.15 SAFETY GLASSES 105866 OFFICE PAVILION/IN7ERIOR RES. $355.73 OFFICE FURNITURE 105867 OX SYSTEMS CO. $74,136.71 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 105868 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $2,568.58 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES -105869 - - ORANGE- VALVE. & FITTING CO. - - -- -- - - $1,721.12 - - INSTRUMENT PARTS ID5870 OSCAR°S LOCK S SAFE $159.42 BUILDING REPAIRS 105871 OXYGEN SERVICE 1632.68 SPECIALTY CASES .� 105872 COUNTY OF ORANGE S62.625.00 DISPOSAL GATE PEE 105873 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $338.86 TOOLS 305874 PACIFIC PROCESS EOUIPMENT.INC. $3.136.02 FREIGHT -- 105875 --- --- PACO PUMPS -- - - - -- - - -- - - 1827.48 PUMP PARTS - 305876 PACIFIC BELL $735.68 TELEPHONE SERVICE 'I 105R77 PACTEL CELLULAR 574.20 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES FUND NO ( 9 - JT DIST YORKTNG CSPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/22/90 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY :I CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/28/9D WARRANT NO. - -- VENDOR - - AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 105878 PAINE f ASSDCIATES S278.75 CONSULTING - PUBLIC RELATIONS DIST 7 - 105879- - -------PARTS UNLIMITED- - - - - — -- - - ---- 91,064.78 TRUCK PARTS ICI 105880 PAUL-MUNROE HYDRAULICS $443.88 CYLINDER REPAIRS 105881 ROY PENDERGRAFT S445.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION --- - 305882 -------PENINSULA- PUMP CORP. - -- - -- - - - $382.50 VALVE - 105863 PERIPHERAL SYSTEMS, INC S2,338.69 OFFICE MACHINE 105889 PN0T0 f SOUND CO. $217.50 INSTRUMENT REPAIR - --1 OSBBS ----Pl-TNEY-BOYES - -----_ ---_---- - --- --- - s1,059.00- - - _- -- SERVICE-AGREEMENT-- - 1058B6 POLY PURE. INC. $14,614.21 POLYMERS H.O.1-10=90 105887 POSTMASTER S340.00 ANNUAL P.O. BOX FEE s -- -105888- POWER-ELEG T0.0-SUPPLY-EO.----- f12.13-- - - - -- ---- -- - - ELECTRIC 6UPPLI¢S - - 105889 POWER SYSTEMS $1.982.00 ENGINE PARTS 105890 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $72.00 ICE - ---1 0 5 891-----THE-PROJECTS-SOLUTION-60•-------"------f7Y049.9P-- --------- ---- INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88 105892 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS f118.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 105893 MAY'S MACHINERY $2,284.38 HARDWARE ------105894---------RCD VAL-VG-CO.,-INC. -------------- S2r171.53- - ---- --- -- PLUMBING SUPPLIES - �:'- 105895 RED WING SHOES S164.61 SAFETY SHOES 1015896 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 9319.39 VALVE PART 5---105897-- REMOLD-FOYER-i RANSMI SSI ON -----------f1r239.N----------- BUSHINGS — - - - - - - -w - 105898 DETECTOR ELECTRONICS 912S.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS -' 105 ROACH WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5672.65 PARTS ' H ...105900 900- --J.-R.-0.08 FRP5-CORP.------- i79,895.70 CONSTRUCTION d-17 105901 ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY s620.37 CREASE W` 105902 RONAN ENGINEERING CO. $1,481.43 ELECTRIC PARTS --- 105903-----ROSEMOUNT/UNTLOG-- ------------s731.54--- --- - -INSTRUMENT PARTS ----- - - 105904 RUTAN S TUCKER S1,609.50 LEGAL SERVICES - I/W ENFORCEMENT 105905 S4FETY-KLEEN CORP. $132.80 PARTS CLEANER - 105906 _-__.-.--SANCON-ENGINEERING-. INC.- ---------- ------31.200.00------------ ------ENGINEKRING SERVICES - 105907 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. S90.256.53 CONSTRUCTION P1-27-162 105908 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTrL S76,015.57 OCEAN SAMPLING M.0.6-14-89 - - 105909 ----SEA-BIRD-ELECTRONICS riNF•------ ------------- - -- S446.50 --- ----- INSTRUMENT REPAIR - 105910 SEAL BLACK $73.05 ASPHALT 105911 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $8.324.04 TOOLS 105912 -- -SHEPHERD-MACHINERY CO------ -- --- . -_ ._ . ._ S962.24 - - HARDWARE - 105913 SIGN MART $4,675.00 PRINTING 105914 SLIDE MASTER S267.75 PRESENTATION AIDS `......--105915-.._____--SMITH-EMERY-CO. .____ .___-_._.__. ._......._.. ..___. _.. __... S845.58 .. _ _.. - SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89. .. 105916 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. S71.68 TOOLS 105917 SOLAR TURBINES INC. S3.022.52 FUEL PUMP 105918 -- - SO. COAST-AIR QUALITY --- .- $859.00 APPLICATION FEES 105919 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY S40Rn•00 APPLICATION FEES 105920 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. S379,175.69 POWER 105921 - -- -- - $0.. CAL.-GAS -CO. . , $9.695.51 NATURAL GAS 105922 enNYNrnN rA, .P- rae r^- VOID •SL LAS�3P 105923 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. S90.63 WATER USEAGE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3122/90 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 -. ..COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - - - _- - -- - --- CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/20/90 ' - WARRANT NO. ---------- ------ -VENDOR ----- - AMOUNT - DESCRIPTION - - - 105924 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 910.00T.31 DIESEL FUEL ----- 105925 ------ SPAGESAVER-SYSTEMS,-INC. $1,867.58 - -- -- -- - FILING SYSTEM'- - -- -'- - 105926 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 31.314.15 DRINKING WATER 105927 STAMEN 2. SPASSOFF. P.E. 913.209.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162.PI-34-2 ---105928-----SPECTRUM--TECHNOLOGY - - --------- -- -- --f132.00----- ----- ""' - OFFICE REPAIRS---- ---- - - 105929 SPEEDE SPEEDOMETER $76.08 DRIVER TESTING 105930 STAR TOOL t SUPPLY CO. 3729.46 TOOLS 5241.52 ____ __._________ _. STEEL-_ _________ ._ 105932 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE t NAINT. 23,847.00 CONTRACT LANDSCAPING M.O.8-9-89 105933 SUPELCO♦ INC. 5139.38 LAB SUPPLIES - --- I85934-- -SUPER INTENDENT-OF-DOGUMENTS----------5295.00--------- PUBLICATIONS ' ---- -- --- - - '- 105935 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL, INC. $3.322.49 TOOLS 105936 T t C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS. INC 5802.92 ELECTRIC PARTS - --105937-- TCH-ASS 061 AYES-- --i 1.O10.00----- --------- LAB SUPPLIES-------- - -- - - - 105938 INC ENVIRONMENTAL 58.895.71 CONSULTING SERVICES - AIR TOKICS 105939 TAYLOR-DUNN f25.26 TRUCK PARTS ----1P5940--- THERMO-ANALYTICAL.-d NC.1NORCAL '1307.PO --- LAB SERVICES - - 105941 THURO t ASSOC. $2.376.00 GROUNDING SURVEY m 105942 TILE MATTERS $169.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES >G 105943 TINE-ELOGK-SALES-A-6ERVI-CE- ---f75.DO----- CLOCK-REPAIR m 195944 TONY•S LOCK 0 SAFE SERVICE 9157.13 KEYS/LOCKS a 105945 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE. INC. 5759.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICES 2-26-3 -----105946- TRANSPORTAT-TOR-CNART ER-S[R V16E -------f261.7C----------BUS RENTAL------------- ' -"'- -- - �j 105947 TRAVEL TRAVEL $1,198.00 TRAVEL SERVICES a` 105948 TRUCK t 4UT0 SUPPLY. INC. $6,635.52 TRUCK PARTS --105949 ----J.G.-TUCKER-t-SON.-INC-- -- -------92.510.31- SAFETY SIGNS—-'- '-- -_.__.. 105950 TWINING LABORATORIES OF - $15,628.50 SOIL TESTING 6-14-89 105951 ULTRA SYSTEMS 54.191.68 ENGINEERING SERVICES v -23.171.69--------- - ----- - ELECTRIC REPAIR9 -- --- --- ' - - 105952�-------0NIC0.EL€CTR IC---- -------�---.----_.._ 105953 UNITED ELECTRIC SUPPLY 5759.54 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 105954 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $271.47 PARCEL SERVICES - 195955 ---- -_ .__.MILLAR-ELEVATOR-COMPANY---- ------------- --------f326.15------- ----- - --- SERVICE AGREEMENT--- - --- :I 105956 UPJOHN HEALTHCARE SERVICES $425.00 CPR TRAINING 105957 VWR SCIENTIFIC $8.260.72 LAB SUPPLIES 105958 ------ ---VALLEY--CITIES SUPPLY CO.--- -- - - -----. ._. - 55.661.27 - - -- ---- -- - FITTINGS - - -- 105959 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1.137.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 105960 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5423.74 SAFETY SIGNS ` .._._..-105961 ---.-VILLAGE--NURSERIES .-._----- .._. -. .__._..__ ....._ . . __ --$40.91 - -_._-__-__._._ .._-__. CROUNDCOVER 105962 WESTATES CARBON. INC. $1,976.25 CARBON 105963 WESTERN WHOLESALE CO. $146.10 TRUCK PARTS 105964 - - .WILCON IND. - - - - S1B3.40 - - INSTRUMENT PARTS 105965 WILLOAN ASSOCIATES $27.122.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-2.2-27.2-29 105966 ROURKE t WOODRUFF $35.144.49 LEGAL SERVICES H.0.6-4-89 105967- -____ . -_ XEROX CORP. _ -_ .__-___-___ _ S1,006.20 .-. -... _ COPIER LEASES _... - . 105968 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES 51.622.79 VALVES �1 105969 YELLOU SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $254.68 LAB REPAIRS fl CC FUND NO ! 79 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSPNG D/TE 3/22/90 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 L. -----_ - ---- - - -COUNTY -SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - a CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/28/90 �I WARRANT NO - ----- VENDOR -- - AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 'l -. .. . . ' 105974 MORRIS PING S482.45 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE 305971 - -------- PORK- INTERNATIONAL-- -��------ � �- - ----�--- � s609.56 - -� OIL- - ±I 105972 ZIERARTH AND ALPER S327.033.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-37 105973 RICHARD 8. EDGAR S200.0F DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 105974 -- -- HENRY-V.-WEDAA ----- -------- - -- - -- - - - S247.00 - -- -- -- - LIABILITY CLAIM--- - -- ---------------- ------TOTAL CLAIMS-PAID--03/28/90-- $8 687,230.49 SUMMARY AMOUNT � ..- . 01 CONST FUND-__.__.___...__-- _-_.__ __..--___.__-....- f.__. ..1,706.64..__. 12 OPER FUND 4,167.67 " 12 CAP PAC FUND 1.223 608 24 02 CONST-FUND_.__- .-._._ -- ------ _. __. ._3a06087 03 OPER FUND 5.499.73 h �xm4 /3 CAP FAC FUND 2l 001.33 h-y -03-COMET-FUND_--_ ____- -.__ ---_.-3a316a55-..-.-_..__ "i 05 OPER FUND 5,170.96 05 CAP FAC FOND 258.769.38 - - 06 OPER FUND __._-....._-..._ ._ .____.____- _.___-..__... _ __- .. . 266.19 ....__ ..-.. _.. .... - .._._ .. .-. ___. _ _ m 16 CAP PAC FUND 461.01 �. 07 OPER FUND 9,610.34 --07 CAP FAC-FUND-- 284,172.97 ._-__-_ ._- ill OPER FUND 10,687.08 114 CAP FAC FUND 529.246.16 6 /566 OPER FUND. _.___. ____ _..-._. _.___.___ _- __. ..______- _ _. 3,238.73-_ ___ 0566 CAP PAC FUND 325.88 0667 OPER FUND 34.88 ..._ 47614.OPER YUND----. _._ ___—__ _ . ..4,219.60 JT OPER FUND 1,030,159.04 CORP 5,175,046.30 ' SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND -- -- - - - -- - - 6,079.75 - - - -- - - --- - -- - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 107.381.19 f 8,687,230.49 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING �.d April 18, 1990 - 7:30 p.m. Orange Public Library 101 North Center Street Orange, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of April 11, 1990, the Board of Directors Of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date at the Orange Public Library. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Roland E. Bigonger, Chairman, Dan Griset, William D. Mahoney, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickler, and Don E. Smith DIRECTORS ABSENT: A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Arthur Newton, Wayne Silzel and Roger R. Stanton STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Secretary, Gary G. Streed, Thomas M. Dawes, Corinne Clawson, Jeff Esber and Judy Lee OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Malcolm Jahr, Elisabeth Charron, Eileen Larcome, H. R. Kinder, Lewis R. Mote, Richard P. Thomas, Robert V. Peringer, Carole Walters, Dennis Duffy, Perry Walker, Bill Leming, Jan Duffy, George Gorham, Lee Kearney, Mildred Jahr, Robert Engelhardt, Chris Barnes, Dave Barnes, Lorraine John, Mira Arthur, Greg Bogart, C. F. Credell , M. Moore, D. Ebert, Ron Sands, Jim Houk, Al Burd, Charles A. Miles, Edward Mozer, Morris and Elsie Hammond, V. Bonaddio, Audrey Herdrich, Maynard Herdrich and Arlene Hughes x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Public Hearing on proposal to collect adopted annual sewer service charges On the property tax bills and On the Sewer Service Charge Report for 1990-91 Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 7:32 p.m. He then announced that the purpose of the public hearing was to consider a written report pertaining to the providing of sewer service for all properties within the District, and the proposal to collect the adopted sewer use fee on the property tax roll beginning with the 1990-91 fiscal year. 4/18/90 DISTRICT 2 Staff Report on proposed use of the The General Manager stated that the County an _ County of Orge property tax bill Sanitation District is responsible for for collection of the annual sewer transporting, treating and disposing of service charge sewage in a safe manner in accordance with strict federal and state laws to protect the public health and safety and the environment. He observed that some of the citizens attending the hearing had not had an opportunity to acquaint themselves with the role that the District plays in managing wastewater and showed a video presentation on the Districts' activities. The Director of Finance then reviewed the staff's reports on District No. 2's financial plan, summarized as follows: The Orange County Sanitation Districts' cost of providing sewerage service to the community has been escalating rapidly because of the increasingly stringent federal and state laws and regulations requiring advanced treatment of wastewater to remove toxic materials and other pollutants from the sewage to assure protection of the public health and safety and the environment. To comply with the new stricter requirements, the Joint Sanitation Districts have constructed sophisticated treatment facilities at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars over the past few years. For several years property tax revenues have been insufficient to meet the District' s operating costs, and it has been necessary for the District to draw down its reserves. In fiscal year 1990-91, without appropriate measures to protect the District's financial integrity, it would have been necessary for the Board to authorize a transfer of $12 million in capital reserves from the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund to the Operating Fund to pay the full costs of operating and maintaining the District collection system and its proportionate share of the operating and maintenance costs of the Joint Treatment Works. By 1993-94 the District will require additional revenues in the amount of $80.3 million to meet its operating expenses and maintain the solvency of the fund due to insufficient tax revenues. To address this fiscal challenge, in 1989, after considerable study of the District's long-range funding requirements, the Board adopted a financial program to avoid projected revenue shortfalls and provide the necessary income required to finance the District' s rising operating expenses, as well as major capital expenditures for construction of master-planned sewerage facilities. The Board's adopted financial program includes a one-time connection fee of $2,270 per dwelling unit for residential property and a $450 per 1,000 sq. ft. charge for commercial , industrial and governmental property. The connection fee is used to pay for expansion of capital facilities to serve new development. Mr. Streed advised that in 1986 District 2 issued $44.3 million in long-tern debt to protect their capital reserves. As the second element of the long-range financial program, to pay for costs of operating, maintaining and rehabilitating the sewerage system, the Board adopted annual sewer service fees, as follows: -2- 4/18/90 DISTRICT 2 Type of Property Annual Fee - Single-family Residence $55.00 - Multi-family Residence/Mobile Home 33.00 - Cortmercial 39.00/1,000 sq. ft. - Industrial 39.00/1,000 sq. ft. - Governmental 39.00/1,000 sq. ft. The Director of Finance noted that the large commercial or industrial dischargers that place an inordinant demand on the District's system are also subject to an additional surcharge under a separate industrial waste ordinance that has been in effect since 1976. Some large industrial industrial dischargers pay as much as $729,211 per year under this program. The Director of Finance, utilizing a slide presentation, summarized the District's organizational make-up and their wastewater management program. He also reviewed the following three billing and collection alternatives that had been identified and evaluated by the staff: - Direct Billing and Collection by District This approach would require the Sanitation District to send a direct bill on a periodic basis to every property owner within the District. The one-time setup cost for this method is estimated at $432,000 plus an annual cost of $302,400, making the total cost for the first year $734,400. The projected five-year cost for the direct billing alternative would be $1,944,000. - Placement of User Fee on Local Water Service Bills for Collection and Remittance to District Under this method the sewer service charge would be included as a separate line item on the bill of the more than 20 water utilities that serve the properties within District No. 2. He noted that a major problem of this method is that with the numerous water purveyors involved it would be difficult to establish a uniform system which adds significantly to the cost; and the reluctance of the water utilities to become the billing agent. The setup cost for this alternative would be $374,000 plus an annual cost of $726,800, for a total cost for the first year of $1,100,800. The estimated five-year cost of performing this billing service is $4,008,000. - Placement of User Fee on County of Orange Property Tax Bill for Collection and Remittance to District Under this alternative the sewer service charge would be included as a separate line item on the property tax bills for all properties within District No. 2. The setup cost would be $374,000. The annual cost of billing under this method is only $67,700. The total first-year cost would be $441,700 and the five-year cost is estimated to be $712,500. -3- 4/18/90 DISTRICT 2 Mr. Streed observed that this method would save the property owner both directly because of significantly lower costs to the District, and indirectly because the cost of making periodic payments by the property owner would be reduced. Staff recommended this alternative as it is clearly the most cost-effective billing and collection method available. Districts 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 have already adopted this method for billing their user fees, and it has proven quite effective in keeping the administrative costs for billing and collecting fees under control in these six Districts. The Director of Finance reiterated that the rising costs to operate the District are due to higher mandated levels of treatment and increased energy costs. The long-range financial program was adopted by the District. because the District's revenues and reserves were decreasing and soon the District would not have been able to meet its operational requirements without an additional revenue source. Mr. Streed then observed that although many of the issues posed by the public were not really relevant to the specific purpose of the hearing, he recognized that the citizens have a genuine interest in the activities of the Sanitation Districts and he, therefore, summarized responses to those questions that had been raised thus far in the three workshops and in telephone inquiries. He explained the role of the District as an operating utility providing an essential service necessary for the protection of the public health and safety, and indicated that the District was established solely to provide wastewater collection, treatment and disposal services to the community. The Director of Finance further explained that while the District has always had the statutory authority to levy a sewer service fee, it had historically financed its operations, maintenance and rehabilitation activities from the property tax. The adopted sewer service charge is based upon use, thus, he reported, it is not a tax and is not subject to Proposition 13 and 62 provisions. Property taxes are based on the value of the property and have no direct relationship to use. Mr. Streed reiterated that the reason for the proposal to collect this fee on the tax bill is because it is the most cost-effective method, and has no bearing on whether it is defined as a tax or a fee. Mr. Streed also reiterated the impact of evolving federal and state regulatory requirements on the District's activities and costs, the cost reduction measures implemented by the Districts, the basis of the fee structure for various purposes and for the various classes of users and the statutory provisions under which the fees were adopted, and then reviewed cash flow projections. The reduction in tax revenues resulting from the passage of Proposition 13 and its implementing legislation, combined with the higher energy costs, the effects of inflation over the past several years, and more stringent treatment requirements mandated by federal , state and local regulatory agencies, would result in depleting reserves and projected operating deficits for the District without the new fees. -4- 4/18/90 DISTRICT 2 The Director of Finance then highlighted the appeal process available to allow for an adjustment of fees in the event of a demonstrated inequity. Appeals relative to inaccurate billings or properties that are not connected to local sewers are handled on a case-by-case basis. The General Manager then reiterated that the purpose of the hearing was to receive public commentary on the District's proposal to collect the annual service charge on the property tax bill. He also advised that official notice of the hearing was mailed during the latter part of February and early March to 139,611 property owners of record on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of Orange, in accordance with the provisions of Section 5473.1 of the California Health and Safety Code. As prescribed by law, a legal notice of the hearing was published in the Orange County Register on March 28, 1990 and again on April 4, 1990. The hearing notice included the District's telephone number for citizens to call with questions or for more information. The staff received approximately 120 calls. Staff also conducted two workshops to answer questions about the proposal and the District's operations. The workshops were held at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 13, at the Fullerton Museum Center, 15 people attended; and Thursday, March 22, at the Backs Building in Placentia, 7 people attended. Receive and file Sewer Service Moved, seconded and duly carried: Charge Report for Fiscal Year 1990-91 That the County Sanitation District No. 2 Sewer Service Charge Report for Fiscal Year 1990-91 be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file written comments The General Manager reported that 89 written communications had been received regarding the sewer service fee and proposed method of collection and summarized the comments; whereupon, It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written communications received from the property owners listed on "Attachment 1" to these minutes, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Oral Public Comments Chairman Bigonger reported that it has been the Board' s experience that most residents of the County do not have the information nor knowledge concerning the importance of the role that the County Sanitation Districts play in their lives. In order to guarantee the protection of the public health and our environment, particularly the ocean waters, as described and shown earlier in the meeting, very elaborate and complex and costly procedures must be undertaken to provide the sewage treatment service for the residents. -5- 4/18/90 DISTRICT 2 The Chairman reiterated that the purpose of the meeting was not for the Board to consider the adoption of a sewer use charge or to consider increasing an existing use charge. The sole purpose was to select the method by which the charge, which was adopted by the Board on February 14, 1990 after two years of study and five public meetings, is to be collected. It is now important to find the most cost-effective way of collecting this revenue, which is necessary to pay for District 2's sewer system and its share in the operation and maintenance of the joint treatment and disposal facilities. Mr. Bigonger acknowledged that some persons were concerned about the adoption of fees, charges and taxes, but again stressed that this is not the scope of this hearing. He asked that any testimony or statements given address solely the collection method, and not whether the fee was liked or disliked. The Chairman invited anyone with some specific concerns regarding the charge to leave their name and address and the staff would contact them. He added that if they wished to write the District, their request would be given due consideration and answered at a later date. The Chair then recognized the following persons who addressed the Board regarding the proposed method for billing and collection of the annual sewer service charge: - Malcolm Jahr, 17292 E. Orange, Yorba Linda Mr. Jahr questioned the cost differential between the alternative utilizing local water service bills for collection and remittance to the District or utilizing the County of Orange property tax bill for collection. It was his contention that since local water service companies already had a billing system in place, the cost shouldn't be as high as indicated by the District to add their sewer service fee. He objected to use of the tax bill and requested that the charge be collected on the local water bills, which would, in his opinion, afford him the opportunity to lodge any protest regarding the sewer service fee with his elected City representatives rather than with the District 2 Board. In response, staff reiterated that there were numerous local water purveyors, and it would be difficult to develop agreements with each of them. In addition, the service charge to collect said fee on behalf of the District (probably 5%) , would be added to the user fee in order to provide the necessary revenue to meet the District's financial obligations. Additional staffing required for recordkeeping associated with this method of collection also accounts for some of the additional costs. - Elisabeth Charron, 10432 Mildred Avenue, Garden Grave Ms. Charron objected that the Notices of Public Hearing were sent as bulk mail . She also criticized the workshop and public hearing sites. .. -6- 4i1ai90 DISTRICT 2 Ms. Charron protested that if the user fee is placed on the County tax bill , the property owner would be forced to pay the charge along with their taxes inasmuch as the County will not accept a partial payment of the bill . She contended that the District had not fully investigated the costs of other alternative methods of collection such as local water bills. She also questioned the equity of the fee structure and the process for contesting the charge. Ms. Charron stated her objection to the public notice procedure the District is required to follow in connection with adoption of an ordinance establishing these fees and for any future adjustments in the fees. - Eileen Larcome, 4605 Wimaurie Avenue, Santa Ana Ms. Larcome stated that she objected to placement of the sanitary sewer service charge on the property tax bill . She suggested the use of television to publicize the fee. She questioned whether it was an annual fee and if it might be adjusted at some point during the year. She also inquired whether she would know if the fee were increased. In response, the District's General Counsel explained that this is an annual sewer service charge. Any adjustments in the fee as a result of futher study and recommendation by the staff would require adoption of a new ordinance. The notice of public hearing on adoption of the ordinance would be published in a major newspaper, as required by statute. The adjusted fee would still appear as a separate line item on the tax bills. - H. R. Kinder, 1342 E. Hickory Lane, Orange Mr. Kinder also commented on the notice procedure relative to adoption of the sanitary sewer service charge. He also stated that he assumed future fees might decrease rather than increase. He expressed concern that the fee would not be itemized on his tax bill . In response, staff advised that the fee will be shown as a separate line item on the tax bills. - Lewis R. Mote, 527 N. Harbor Blvd. , Anaheim Mr. Mote stated that he realized that his questions relative to the District' s high operating costs listed on the Notice of Public Hearing were not the issue that evening, but still wanted to register his concern relative to the increase in expenses projected through 1993-94. He added that he was in agreement with the previous speakers' comments. - Richard P. Thomas, 4431 East Olivebranch Way, Anaheim Mr. Thomas addressed the issue of equitability relative to the adopted charges for commercial and industrial buildings. He stated that, in his opinion, it would be more equitable to base the charge �.: on water use rather than on square footage. Mr. Thomas urged the District to find a more equitable method of computing the fee. -7- 4/18/90 DISTRICT 2 - Robert V. Peringer, 231 So. Parklane, Orange Mr. Peringer expressed his appreciation for the services of Sanitation District No. 2. He then stated his objection to �.✓ collection of what, in his opinion, were additional taxes in the guise of a user fee. He commented on the increase in the budget this year for the County of Orange and felt the District's financial requirements should be included in that amount. Mr. Peringer also inquired whether the Districts collect user fees for other governmental agencies to evade the limitations of Proposition 13. In response, staff pointed out that County Sanitation District No. 2 was a special district created under the County Sanitation District Act and was separate and apart from general purpose government known as Orange County government. Accordingly, District No. 2's operation and maintenance requirements are not included in the County budget. Staff also advised that none of the fees collected on behalf of the Sanitation Districts go to any other agency. All fees are solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of sewage. - Carole Walters, 534 N. Shaffer Street, Orange Ms. Walters stated that she had mistakenly believed that the hearing that evening concerned the adoption of the sanitary sewer service fee. She also commented that she felt the fee structure should include an allowance for senior citizens. - Dennis Duffy, 11752 Reva Drive, Garden Grove Mr. Duffy expressed his concerns relative to the equitability of the fee. He suggested that the criteria for establishing the charge be based on water usage rather than the type of property connected to the sewer. The Board questioned whether he was suggesting that sewage meters be installed in every household and if he would prefer to pay the higher cost of metering. Mr. Duffy replied that the District should work with the local water companies to receive information necessary to bill the property owners. He did, however, acknowledge that it would be difficult to determine the actual amount of water being discharged into the sewer based solely upon the amount of water received. He contended that the District could obtain the necessary information from the local water companies to compute the bills and still collect the charges on the property tax bills. Mr. Duffy also conceded that he would prefer to pay the lowest cost possible. - Perry Walker, 12281 Lampson, Garden Grove Mr. Walker questioned the criteria used by the District to establish the fee for a single-family residence versus an apartment building. -8- 4/18/90 DISTRICT 2 Mr. Walker also questioned whether apartment owners would be properly billed for the number of units they owned. He noted that he had observed various apartment complexes in his area that were not on record with the County of Orange as apartments. In response, staff advised that studies conducted by the Districts, as well as other agencies, indicate that the discharge from apartments is approximately 60% of the amount discharged from a single-family residence. Accordingly, the fee structure provides for a 60% differential in the charge per unit. Multiple units are billed based on the County Assessor's official property records. - Bill Leming, 2720 E. Walnut Avenue, R7, Orange Mr. Leming stated his objection to the method of collection. He also contended that the sewer service charges should be based on water usage, not on the type of property owned. In his opinion, the user fee is more like a property tax and is inequitable, especially for the owners of small commercial buildings. He reiterated that his main complaint was that the District didn't provide for equitability in the fee structure. - Jan Duffy, 11752 Reva Drive, Garden Grove Mrs. Duffy also questioned the equity of the fee structure because of different household occupancies. She stated that the charge should be collected on water bills and should be based on usage rather than be a flat fee. In conclusion, in response to the public commentary on equitability of the user fee, staff reiterated that large commercial and industrial dischargers pay under a separate ordinance based upon their demand on the sewer system. Some pay as much as $729,000 per year in District 2. Staff also pointed out that a new study would be conducted to address the equity issue, and that any forthcoming recommendations for changes would be submitted to the Districts' Boards at a later date. Close hearing There being no further public comments, the Chairman then declared the hearing closed at 9:10 p.m. Adopting a finding that the Moved, seconded and duly carried: ma Ority of property owners have not protested relative to That the Board of Directors does hereby collecting annual sewer service find that a majority of the owners of Charges on the property tax bills the property, which is the subject of the Sewer Service Charge Report for Fiscal Year 1990-91, have not protested the proposed collection of annual sewer service charges on the property tax bills. -9- 4/18/90 DISTRICT 2 Adoption of Sewer Service Charge Moved, seconded and duly carried: Report for Fiscal Year 1990-91 That the County Sanitation District No. 2 Sewer Service Charge Report for Fiscal year 1990-91 be, and is hereby, adopted. Directing the County Auditor- Moved, seconded and duly carried: Controller to include sewer service charges on property tax bills That the Board of Directors hereby beginning in 1990-91 adopts Resolution No. 90-38-2, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges on property tax bills beginning in fiscal year 1990-91 for collection, pursuant to Ordinance No. 210 of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County. Said resolution, be reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9: 12 p.m. , April 18, 1990. <ZL. ko6. Secretary, B�_ o d of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California -10- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA I ALLIS AV ME 'a W.9127 April 11, 1990 wuxruw vAnalt983u13ow'A n22e.A127 DISTRICT 2 PROPOSAL TO COLLECT USER FEE ON PROPERTY TAX BILL Summary of Written Comments Received Throuah April 10, 1990 SUPPORT PROPOSAL PREFER USE OF WATER BILL Marilyn R. Cochran Greene and Frazier 211 S. Redwood Ave. Certified Public Accountants Brea, CA 92621 1240 Lakeview Ave. Anaheim, CA 92807 DISTRICT SHOULD CUT COSTS INEQUITABLE RATE STRUCTURE L. T. Mazzola William S. Harvey 2825 Firethorne Ave. Developer & Real Estate Broker Fullerton, CA 92635 PO Box 1514 Arroyo Grande, CA 93421 Stanford Park PROPOSITION 13 10352 Stanford Ave. Garden Grove, CA 92640 Robert M. Ames 1527 W. Earle Place Anaheim, CA 92802 "ATTACHMENT 1" TO APRIL 18, 1990 MINUTES DISTRICT No. 2 PROPERTIES NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER Anaheim Barksdale, Anthony W. Harris, Paul D. Barksdale, Patricia A. 4910 Santa Ana, Cyn Rd. 181 S. Possum Hollow Anaheim, CA 92807 Anaheim, CA 92807 Earnest Ronald E. Liggett, Francis Sherman Barnes, Carol M. 571 S. Peralta Hills Dr. 7675 Eucalyptus Way Anaheim, CA 92807 Anaheim, CA 92808 Chadez, Victor Lopez, Antonio H. 5426 E. Orangethorpe Ave. 1342 N. Miller St. Anaheim, CA 92807 Anaheim, CA 92806 Chavez, David J. Ponteprino, Meyer E. 4420 E. La Palma Ave. 1471 N. Placentia Ave. Anaheim, CA 92807 Anaheim, CA 92806 Fountain, Evart C. Ritter, Larry R. 1432 W. Roberta Ritter, Maria E. Fullerton, CA 92633 191 S. Possum Hollow Anaheim, CA 92808 Bale, Patricia Ann 101 S. Eucalyptus Dr. Vista Del Rio Ro Water Group Anaheim, CA 92808 PO Box 17073 Anaheim, CA 92817 Fullerton Donegan, Craig R. Taylor, Burt L. Donegan, Pamela T. 1220 Linda Lane 3110 Las Faldas Dr. Fullerton, CA 92631 Fullerton, CA 92635 Moisi, Joseph A. Teasdale, Audrey B. 1300 Sunnycrest Dr. 400 E. Las Palmas Dr. Fullerton, CA 92635 Fullerton, CA 92635 Garden Grove Garcia, Joe M. Garcia, Avalon 13141 Palm St. Garden Grove, CA 92643 DISTRICT No. 2 PROPERTIES NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER Orange Amusement Electronics Co. Moore, Melinda C. 19142 Glen Arran Lane 1638 N. Cambridge Orange, CA 92669 Orange, CA 92667 Bulthuis, Albert Oliver, Andrew L. 1962 N. Glassell St. 805 N. Lincoln St. Orange, CA 92665 Orange, CA 92667 Byers, Elaine Piper Paulus, Arthur E. 6705 E. Oak Lane PO Box 3035 Orange, CA 92669 Orange, CA 92665 Cosy, Robert C. Perez, Severiano J. 16522 E. Cumberland Ave. Perez, Ruth A. Orange, CA 92665 16542 Heim Ave. Orange, CA 92665 Cooper, Jon W. Cooper, Rathlin M. Ramer, Mary B. 962 Wanda Rd. 3042 N. Sheri St. Orange, CA 92667 Orange, CA 92665 Estes, Garmon Jr. Ritter, Maurice A. 1902 E. Collins 16372 Heim Ave. Orange, CA 92667 Orange, CA 92665 Plocken, Marie E. Schuck, Clifford D. 627 Cully Dr. 15581 E. Cully Dr. Orange, CA 92665 Orange, CA 92665 Hawkins, G. William Shanafelt, John G. Jr. 6807 E. Oak Lane 3827 W. Chapman Ave. Orange, CA 92669 Orange, CA 92668 Hoffman, William Spielman, Leonard 2396 N. Batavia St. 6719 E. Oak Lane Orange, CA 92665 Orange, CA 92669 Jefts, Richard M. Travernier, Ernest 16386 Fellows Dr. 16312 Fellows Dr. Orange, CA 92665 Orange, CA 92665 Johnson, Clayton W. Jr. Walker, William R. 12431 E1 Rancho Place 16352 Heim Ave. Garden Grove, CA 92640 Orange, CA 92665 LeCouix, James E. - Witt, Richard D. PO Box 5887 956 N. Shaffer St. 1432 North Glassell Orange, CA 92667 Orange, CA 92613 DISTRICT No. 2 PROPERTIES NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER Placentia OLander, Harold H. Phillips, Lasts M. PO Box 51 2419 N. Rose Dr. Placentia, CA 92670 Placentia, CA 92670 Santa Ana Quick, Alvin E. Quick, Nellie W. PO Box 5094 Santa Ana, CA 92704 Villa Park Ehlen, Lawrence H. Metz, Ramey B. 10232 Center Dr. 18605 S. Mesa Dr. Villa Park, CA 92667 Villa Park, CA 92667 Henderson, Dortha M. 18916 S. Mesa Dr. Villa Park, CA 92667 Yorba Linda Asta, Donald W. Crowder, Rutherford H. Asta, Ingrid M. 5072 Richfield Rd. 5373 Grandview Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Dutton, Roy Atzet, Frank C. 5642 Grandview Ave. 18820 Oriente Dr. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Flatten, Orris H. Basham, U. H. 17745 Lomita Lane 4202 Merienda Lane Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Flynn, Patrick F. Baxter, Howard L. 5521 Grandview Ave. 4551 Rose Dr. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Fox, Gregg G. Covey, Thomas A. 16882 Nightingale Lane 5462 S. Lake View Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 DISTRICT No. 2 PROPERTIES NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER Yorba Linda (Con't) Hawkins, Eugene S. Morton, Emery L. 5432 Lakeview Ave. 19100 Pradera Lane Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Hoffman, Richard W. Mulkey, Larkin V. 5611 Kellogg Dr. 5832 Ohio St. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Imperial-Rose,Co. Oberjuerge, Robert A. 1920 St. Andrews Dr. 18847 Via Sereno Seal Beach, CA 90740 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Jagusiak, Mark M. O'Shea, Rita Jagusiak, Mary B. 4611 N. Palm 19198 Skyview Knoll Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Page, Raymond A. Jensen, Larry W. PO Box 89 19192 Skyview Knoll Atwood, CA 92601 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Prosser, Barbara Kroenlein, Dieter 4588 Danita Lane 5571 Fircrest Dr. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Sanderfer, Ruby E. Lankford, James W. 18491 Buena Vista Lankford, Judy Yorba Linda, CA 92686 4293 Avocado Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 82686 Shaver, Howard W. 16631 Lathrop Dr. Leonard, James K. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Leonard, Dorothy M. 4911 Shaw Lane Shigekawa, William M. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 206 Copp Kula, HI 96790 Majors, William J. 4561 N. Palm Ave. Staumont, Ferdinand Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Staumont, Lenke E. 18101 Avolinda Dr. Merlo, Joe Yorba Linda, CA 92686 4912 Casa Loma Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Stewart, Robert 5641 Mountain View Ave. Meyers, Byron P. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 4761 Palm Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Studer, Leo L. Studer, Katherine A. McCormick, William C. 5374 Douglas Lane 4742 Palm Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 DISTRICT No. 2 PROPERTIES NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER Yorba Linda (Con't) Warren, Herbert M. Williams, Sidney H. 5251 Highland Ave. 5271 Cherrylee Lane Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 County Sanitation District No. 11 of _ Orange County PROJECT REPORT Slater Avenue Pump Station _ Sewage System Improvements Contract No. 11 - 17 y�TATfp AgN`G�e C � ❑X Preliminary Report for District Comments Dated 1 2-22-89 ❑X Draft Report for City & Others Comments Dated 7-20-90 0 For District Comments Dated 3-20-90 Fx1 Final Report Dated 4-3-90 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS R TA vW1�R CTV.G uxn.xt u• Gouuwm u aw vum.o.0 ncso-iu 9W UCOO.G WZW9D,G YO�W,U IDf 1N]fIF$G COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY PROJECT REPORT SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NO. 11-17 C i O ISM OR ORANGE COUNTY a _ O ORECTOR OF ENGINEERING DATE PRE D UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: 9 FES a !�-,-,,/ co�5 KAgI 464 LG 4 /,. c z�////1Gl --3 90 �2 hO R.I.E. DATE O F� n o No.25772 OI�" �9. CA C yr,UF CAU: r r r TABLE OF CONTENTS N PBe Na r INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 AUTHORMTION ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK............................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 PROJECTTEAM .................................................................................................. 1-3 r SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 GENERAL.......................................................................................................I... 2-1 r 2.2 COLLECTION SYSTEM........................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 PUMPING STATION............................................................................................. 2-2 2.4 PROJECT COSTS.........................._.................................................................... 2-4 2.5 INTDAL CONSTRUCTION..................................................................................... 2-4 2.6 INITIAL PROJECT COSTS BY DI5IT=.............................................................. 2.7 CHANGES IN LAND USE..................................................................................... 2-5 COLLECTION SYSTEM r 3.1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................._............... 3-1 3.2 SCOPE................................................................................................................ 3.1 3.3 DESIGN CRITERIA.............................................................................................. 3-2 3.4 MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................. 3-3 3.5 DISCUSSION OF ALTERNATIVES........................................................................ 3-4 3.6 SEWERAGE TO THE PUMPING STATION............................................................ 3-5 3.7 SEWERAGE FROM THE PUMPING STATION ....................................................... 3-12 3.8 SUMMARY.......................................................................................................... 3-22 3.9 UTILITY SEARCH ................................................................................................ 3-22 3.10 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN ................................................................................. 3-24 3.11 STREET RECONSTRUCTION ............................................................................. 3-25 r SIATERAVENUE PUMP STATION ANALYSIS 4.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 PUMPS................................................................................................................ 4-3 4.3 POWER............................................................................................................... 4-11 4.4 STRUCTURE....................................................................................................... 4-12 4.5 SITE.................................................................................................................... 4-13 4.6 AUXQ]ARY SYSTEMS........................................................_............................... 4-15 r PROJECT COSTS AND SCHEDULES r 5.1 GENERAL........................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 PROJECT COSTS................................................................................................. 5.1 5.3 SCHEDULES........................................................................................................ 5-7 I TABLE OF CONTENTS .�r (Continued) Pao No. COSCALLOCATION 6.1 GENERAL............................................................................................................ 6-1 r 6.2 NEW MPROVEMENCS......................................................................................... 6-1 6.3 EXISTING FACBSf[ES............................................»............................................ 6-4 r r r r U r LIST OF TABLES eY Table PAre No. 3-1 Alternative Pipe Sims to Carry 6.55 MOD........................................................... 3-11 3-2 Alternative Pipe Capacities at Minimum Slope.................................................... 3-3 Slater Avenue Pump Station Influent Sewer Replacement.................................. 3.13 3.4 Parallel Sewer.................................................................................................... m 3-5 Force Main Hydraulics for Economic Comparison Only...................................... 3-16 3-6 Force Main Pipe Sim Alternatives....................................................................... 3.7 Force Main Comparison Estimated Annual Cost................................................ 3-17 r 3-8 Construction Costs of Alternative Improvements to Sewers................................ 3-19 3-9 Capacity of Existing 24-Inch Nichols Street Gravity Sewer................................. 3-22 5-1 Estimated Unit Prices for Sanitary Sewer Construction...................................... 5-2 5-2 Estimated Projects Costs for Recommended Sewers Tributary to Pumping Station........................................................................................................... 5-3 5-3 Estimated Projects Costs for Recommended Sewers from Pumping Station....... 5-4 5-4 Slater Avenue Pumping Station Estimated Project Costs.................................... 5-5 5-5 Total Recommended Project Costs...................................................................... 5-6 6-1 Project Cost Split New Improvements................................................................. 6-3 6-2 Cost Basis for Existing Facilities........................................................................ 6-5 6.3 Project Buy-In Costs.......................................................................................... 6-7 r v r v r r r W r LIST OF FIGURES d F Page No. 1-1 Existing CSDOC Sewers..................................................................................... 1-2 e 2-1 Recommended Improvements............................................................................ 23 ,d 3-1 Existing CSDOC Sewers-Springdale Street....................................................... 3-7 3-2 Existing CSDOC Sewers Slater Avenue.............................................................. 3.9 3-3 Slater Avenue Pump Station Collection System Recommended Solutions........................................................................................................... 3.23 r 4-1 Slater Avenue Pump Station Site Plan................................................................ 4-2 4-2 ModlBed System Head Curve............................................................................. 4.4 4.3 Falrbanb-Masse Pumps.................................................................................... 4-6 4-4 Sewage Pump Performance Alternative 2............................................................ 4-8 4-5 Sewage Pump Performance Alternative 3............................................................ 4-10 r 5-1 Preliminary Project Schedule............................................................................. 5-8 r a r r r r iv r LIST OF APPENDICES w Appendix Title or Information Contained A GTE Site Layouts Sewer Plan and Profiles B Master Plan Printouts C Certification of Utility Inspection D List of Utilities Contacted and Index to Utility Plans in JCE Files E Pumping Station Lease Agreement and Easement with GTE F Pump Data G CSDOC Pump Station Reliability Analysis r w r s r r v On June 7, 1989,County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California authorized John Carollo Engineers through Contract No. 11-17 to prepare this Engineering Report which presents a plan for relieving deficiencies to the.Slater-Springdale Trunk System and the Slater Avenue w Pump Station and to divert 5.4 MOD to the Miller Holder System for a not to exceed fee of$44.738.00. .r wr y �1 A A w CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND District No. 11 serves approximately seventy percent of the City of Huntington Beach and rellea on three main trunk systems to convey flows to Reclamation Plant No. 2: the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, the Knott Interceptor and the Coast Trunk. The primary expansion of trunk facilities within District 11 occurred in the late 1950's. In the northwesterly portion of District 11. the expansion included construction of the Edinger LfR Station, the Slater Avenue Trunk. Slater Avenue Pump Station. and the Slater Avenue Force Main and the Nichols Stint Gravity Sewer which drained to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. Further expansion of the system was provided by construction of the 5prurgdale-Edinger Relief In 1970, and eatmv of the Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer, the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension and connection to the Knon Interceptor in 1974- .. Current master planning cfforts(l) have found that most of the existing facilities shown in Figure 1-1 will be deficient for meeting both short-term and long-term capacity requirements. The most notable deficiencies are the Slater Avenue Pump Station. the Slater Avenue Force Mains and gravity sewers. all of which will require upsizing to meet planned capacity requirements. In addition. 5.4 MGD (average flow) from the Slater Avenue system must be diverted to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer to offset use of the Knott Interceptor by District S to avert deficiencies throughout the Miler-Holder Trunk Sewer system north of Hazard Avenue. 1.2 AUTHORIZATION Facing the need for new and larger facilities in order to meet the District's responsibilities for ~ collection of its wastewaters in a mariner which will protect the public health. the District took action toward alleviating the above-mentioned deficiencies. On June 7th. 1989. County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County authorized the preparation of this study by John Carodo Engineers IJCE). 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK This project report includes an analysis of the following: 1) A new above-ground Slater Avenue Pump Station including right-of-way .. requirements: (1) References are listed at the end of the text. .-1 nrvwnw.mii s.m..ed. W 03 IN EDII 1 IY IZ at Icc W 1/2 MILE IM I 0 1/e IM N I i APPROXIMATE SCALE ILL 1! V IW 1¢ H ti Y IN Z F ¢ 10 1Q to 14. N �FLOOD 6 1 S� IPHON N /Ft I WART _• / SEWER N W • ■NOW a New•sea•NEW aNEW z z ;¢ � 1 d � 1 ¢ W n _ � 0 . 01 1 - � I la w ' Y < � � NSLATER-: V 21 N (S-1T) r• SLATER-S AVE Component I// Slater-Springdale Trunk Sewer 1' Golden West Trunk Sewer Nichols Street Gravity Sewer Knott Interceptor(Reach 2) Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer(Reach 2) Slater-Springdale(and Edinger Relief Sewer) EXISTING Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer CSDOC SEWERS Slater Avenue Force Main Sewer(New Force Main FIGURE 1-1 Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and Slater Avenue Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS I� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY W I-2 2) A new force main and gravity sewer along Slater Avenue through Gothard Street extending approximately to Nichols Sheet; 3) A new gravity sewer between Nichols Street and the Knott Interceptor located at Newland Street and Slater Avenue; r 4) The possibility of including full relief capacity in the Knott Interceptor between Newland Sheet and Magnolia Street; 5) A diversion structure at Magnolia Street and Slater Avenue whereby approximately _ 5.4 MGD average daily flow from the Knott Interceptor could be diverted to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. s 6) An analysis of the Nichols Street Gravity Sewer(use D/d = .921; 7) The inlet facilities at the new Slater Pump Station beginning at Slater Avenue and Golden west Street: 8) The Golden West Trunk Sewer from Slater Avenue to Edinger Avenue: 9) The Hell Avenue Interceptor from Springdale Avenue to Golden West Street. r Specific Items of work associated with the above Include: 1) Conducting a search of all utilities in the affected streets, including an on-site r inspection; 2) Preparing preliminary plan and profiles of the recommended sewer improvements: r 3) Preparing a conceptual traffic plan for mitigating construction impacts; 41 Preparing preliminary pump station layouts as well as a system-head curve for the pumps: 5) Coordinating with affected agencies. GTE and utilities; 6) Preparing a financial analysis of cost sharing between Districts 3 and 11. r 1.4 PROJECT TEAM The project team members are employed by the District (CSDOC) and by JCE. Tom Dawes (CSDOC) and Dennis Wood [JCE) provided council and control. Chris Ludlow and John Thohnasov(CSDOC) and Jack McCabe(JCE) managed the project and Nick Arhontes WSDOC) offered field and technical input. r 1-3 r w w CHAPTER 2 r r chapter 2 .. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS r 2.1 GENERAL Recommendations are made for the Slater Avenue Pump Station and for sewers flowing to and from it. r 2.2 COLLECTION SYSTEM System recommendations to alleviate capacity deficiencies are summarized below. Prehminary plan and profile and cross sections of proposed interceptors are included in Appendix A. A. Sewerage to the Pumping Station r 1. Slater-Springdale relief should be accomplished by diverting 6.55 MGD to new 27-inch and 36-inch diameter sewers flowing east on Heil Avenue to the Golden West Trunk Sewer. 2. The Golden West hunk Sewer. in need of replacement for both capacity and structural reasons. should be removed and replaced in the same location with a new,42-inch diameter sewer. 3. The pumping station influent pipe on Slater Avenue should be paralleled with a new 42-inch diameter sewer to a point abreast of the pump station and a 72-inch diameter sewer to the new pump station. 4. A new pumping station with adequate vehicular access should be constructed east of the existing station. B. Sewerage from the Pumping Station — Based on the options discussed in this report. the following recommendations are made: r 1. A new 36-inch diameter ductile Iron pump station effluent force main should be constructed in Slater Avenue to Gothard Street. .r r 2-1 r 2. A new 36-inch diameter gravity sewer should be constructed in Slater Avenue between Gothard Street and Nichols Street. 3. The 5.4 MGD (average flow) should be diverted to the Nichols Street Gravity w Sewer. 4. The existing Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension from west of Eoledo Lane to Beach Boulevard should be paralleled with a 33-inch diameter relief sewer. 5. The existing Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension east from Beach Boulevard s to Newland Street should be paralleled with a 36-inch diameter relief sewer. These recommended improvements are shown on Figure 2-1. 2.3 PUMPING STATION Analysis of pumping station considerations detailed later in this report has led to the following recommendations: r 1. Continue to negotiate with GTE for the purchase of a new site east of the existing pump station. 2. Construct a new pumping station on a site large enough to meet the reliability standards for safe, convenient access and maintenance. ee 3. Budd the new above-ground station with five new pumps similar to those at the Main Street Pumping Station with adequate clear space between mechanical units. 4. Include an emergency diesel generator of adequate size to supply all pump and station loads. Enclose the stand-by power equipment in a room separate from the r motor mom. 5. Select exterior building and landscape architecture to present a pleasing appearance to local residents and to blend in with other existing structures. 6. Design accoustical abatement treatment to make the station quiet. _ 22 ¢ W QY Q I/< I/P MILE Z APPROXIMATE SCALE i. W m 0 E%letlnp Sewers B W To Remain �J W Springdale - Slater Trunk Sewer �¢ HEIL „rM Slater Ave. 27' rim.. Miller Holder Y Z �.t � _.���. Knoa Interceptor ¢ 8� � .......... NIChOIS Street F ez � �a a N W W � z 8 svnnw SEWER W ®Q 9u u N y �¢ z 'I' � 1 F J i Z G C J z w waa®�woaa S A LATEq-R$A I �/ RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE 2-1 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -3 2.4 PROJECT COSTS The estimated project costs for the improvements recommended in this report are as follows: Sewers to the pumping station $ 8.813.000 Sewers from the pumping station $ 3,738,000 Pumping station $ 5,430,000 Total $17,981,000 �+ Of this estimated cost, District Three's portion would be $1,050.000 while District Eleven's would be $16,931,000. All costs are based on ENR-LA Index of 6400. This is the projected cost at mid-point of construction. r 2.5 INITIAL CONSTRUCTION Based on field surveys of actual[lows and needs, the following elements would be constructed initially: 1) The Golden West Trunk Sewer, .. 2) The Slater Avenue, Pumping Station influent pipe; r 3) The pumping station: 4) The force main to Gothard Street; 5) The Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer from Gothard to Nichols Street with the Diversion Structure. The remaining improvements would be constructed as flows increase in the future. 2.6INITIAL PROJECT COSTS BY DISTRICT Based on this study, the project costs for the recommended initial construction are as follows: 2-4 s Estimated Cost District 3 District 11 Total r Golden West Trunk Sewer -- $ 4.302,000 $ 4,302,000 Slater Avenue Pumping Station $ 261.000 $ 476.000 $ 737.000 r Influent Relief Sewer Slater Avenue Pumping Station and r 72-inch Influent Sewer $ 657.900 $ 5,G62.200 $ 5,720.000 Force Main to Gothard Street and r Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer $ 131,200 $ 1,009,800 $ 1.141,000 from Gothard Street to Nichols Street with the .. Diversion Structure Totals $1.050.000 $10.850,000 $11.900,000 r _ 27 CHANGES INLAND USE As this report is being prepared,changes 1n land use are being considered by the City and the County and they my affect the final size of the facilities recommended herein. These should be reviewed and Incorporated prior to final design, r r r r 2.5 r s r CHAPTER 3 chapter3 COLLECTION SYSTEM 3.1 INTRODUCTION General •" The area of the CSDOC's collection system studied is in the southwest quadrant of District No. 3 and the northern portion of District 11. Flows come from District No. 3 primarily from _ the north and from District 11 from the west. They combine at the Knott Interceptor and flow to Treatment Plant No. 2. _ The area of the study is bounded on the west by Springdale Avenue, on the north by Edinger Avenue, on the east by Magnolia Street, and on the south by Slater Avenue. r 3.2 SCOPE The collection system components studied include parts of the following projects: Component Construction Contract No. — Slater-Springdale (and Edinger Relief Sewer) 11-11 • Slater Springdale"Runk Sewer 11-6 • Golden West Trunk Sewer 11-3 • Nichols Street Gravity Sewer 11-10-1 • Knott Interceptor (Reach 2) 3-17 — • Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension 11-12 • Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer(Reach 21 3-1 • Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer 11-10-1 • Slater Avenue Force Main Sewer(New Force Main) 11-10-3 • Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and Slater Avenue Pumping Station and Form Main Sewer I1-10-2 All of the above are shown in Figure 1-1. The Slater Avenue Pump Station is analyzed In Chapter 4. The Edinger Relief Sewer is net part of this study. Particularly, this section of the report Includes an analysis of the following: 3-1 1) A new and deep force main flowing eastward on Slater Avenue from the pumping station past Gothard Street, extending approximately to Nichols Street. 2) A new gravity sewer flowing eastward on Slater Avenue between Nichols Street and the Knott Interceptor at Newland Street. 3) The possibility of including full relief capacity in the Knott Interceptor on Slater Avenue between Newland Street and Magnolia Street. 4) The Knott Interceptor and the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at the intersection of Slater Avenue and Magnolia Street to divert approximately 5.4 MGD (average Row) from the Knott Interceptor to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer there. .. 5) The Nichols Street Gravity Sewer. 6) The Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer flow east from Golden West Street to the Slater Avenue Pumping Station. 7) The Golden West Trunk Sewer south from Edinger Avenue to Slater Avenue. 8) A new relief sewer on Heil Avenue flowing east from Springdale Avenue to Golden West Street. After consideration of the design criteria Involved in any new construction, this report reproduces the gross tabulated recommendations of the Master Plan(1) for the relief of deficiencies found in the study leading to that plan. Following that, each of the listed parts of the collection system will be addressed in this chapter with alternative considerations for implementing recommended solutions. 3.3 DESIGN CRITERIA District's Standards The hydraulic design criteria used in the considerations in this report are those stated in the CSDOC's "Design and Construction Requirements for Sanitary Sewers12). , In addition, wherever an existing sewer is being considered to remain in service along with a new parallel line, the same hydraulic criteria (i.e.. D/d) is applied to both. .. (1) CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineers (2) CSDOC Design and Construction Requirements for Sanitary Sewers - 1987 3-2 3.4 MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS Flows Appendix B of this report shows the final computer printouts of the projected year 2020 sewer r flows used in the Master Plan. Those flows are from Appendix 2C of the Master Plan which was completed in February 1989(1). That plan also lists the maximum total flow rate at the Slater Avenue Pumping Station as 28.31 MGD. Subsequent to preparation of the Master PlariM, various revisions to land-use have surfaced. Planned sewage flows from a recently identified Bolas Chlca development have been reduced to below those estimated in the Master Plan and as reported by Boyle Engineering Corporation in their October 24. 1989 letter as follows: all or a portion of proposed flow from the Bolas Chica Development could be introduced into the CSDOC system anywhere along Los Palos or Slater Avenue after master planned sewer improvements for Wainer Ave, Hell Ave. Goldenwest Street and Slater Pump Station/Force Main have been made..:' This change is expected to reduce District No. 11 contribution to the Slater Avenue System by 0.94 MGD (average). The Master Plan accounts for 1.61 MGD (average)from District No. 3 that flows north to Slater Avenue/Golden West. In a recent report prepared by WNdan and Associates(3), a part of District No. 3 was considered for service arra exchange with District No. 11. This exchange Will not take place. However, in review of the topography of the area in question, it appears that 600 acres of the total area evaluated will flow to the Slater Avenue System. Considering medium density development and the unit flow generator from the Master Plan, the total projected flow from District No. 3 is 2.33 MGD (average). Therefore, an additional 0.72 MGD (average) of District No. 3 flow must be accounted for. Other minor revisions include development of a parcel along Golden west Street in District No. 11 that was previously open space. There appears to be the potential for reconnecting a shopping center in District No. 3 that now flows into the Slater Avenue System to the District 3 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System. This should be considered during final design to reduce pumping requirements. At this point in development, it would appear that the total flows from the Master Plan are .. consistent for this report and that 28.3 MGD Is a satisfactory design flow for the Slater Avenue Pumping Station. (1) CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineers (3) Willdan Report-Study and Recommendations for Exchange of Service Areas Between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11. 3-3 However, the relative District No. 3/District No. 11 contributions appear to be different, with District No. 3's share increasing. Flow Diversion The Master Plan (Volume 4, Part 1. Page 11-1)(1) concludes that "...5.4 MGD (average) or 27 percent of the now from the District No. 11 Slater Avenue system must be diverted to the Miller-Holder Trunk at Nichols Avenue (Street) in order to offset use of the Knott Interceptor by District No. 3 to avert deficiencies throughout the entirety of the Miller-Holder Trunk north of Hazard Avenue. This Master Plan action to switch flow routing will save millions of dollars on improvements in District No. 3.- (sic) As shown in the computer printouts reproduced as Appendix B. the Master P1an(1) system analysis shows 5.4 MGD (average flow) subtracted from the Slater Avenue Trunk sewer at Nichols Street, transported north, and added to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at Warner Avenue and Nichols Street. The Master Plan and this report compare that subtraction described above to one at Slater Avenue and Magnolia Street. In this scenario, the 5.4 MGD (average) would continue to flow s along Slater Avenue to the Knott Interceptor. At that point, the flow would be diverted to the Miller-Holder Trunk. The invert of the Knott Interceptor Is above the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer as they cross at the Slater Avenue/Magnolia Street intersection. District No. 11 Deficiencies In addition to the overloaded sewers, the Master Plan mentions that the Golden West Trunk Sewer Is in a very deteriorated state and requires more capacity. Much of the deterioration Is due to poor soil conditions and resulting settling. This affects Its capacity and ability to be cleaned and maintained. _ Recent short-term metering of the Golden West Trunk Sewer south of Warner Avenue showed that the maximum flow exceeds its design capacity. Routine surcharging of this pipe is reported by CSDOC maintenance personnel. Minor rehabilitation will also be required on the Nichols Street Gravity Sewer before the mid-1990s. Recent televising shows the sewer to be in good condition, but the manholes will need flow-line repairs. Recent analysis of Slater Avenue Pump Station, based on pump running times. Indicated that Its capacity has almost been reached. (1) CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineer 3-4 3.5 DISCUSSION OF ALTERNATIVES General This part of the study is concerned with the Bows Into the Slater Avenue Pump Station and those from it. The capacity of the Slater-Springdale-Golden West sewerage to the pump station was found deficient in the Master Plan(l). This report addresses remedies for those sewers. The Slater Avenue system from the pumping station was found deficient in capacity, and in addition, 5.4 MGD (average Bow)must be diverted from it. While the Master Plan(l) proposes a general solutlon,this report analyzes more detailed alternatives to those solutions. .. In regard to Bows to or from the pumping station, most alternatives Involve either a parallel relief sewer or replacement of an existing smaller sewer with a larger one along the same alignment. Advantages of the parallel sewer construction Include the use of the same connections that are used now Instead of disconnecting and reconnecting all tributary pipes. Parallel sewerage construction would provide continuity of Bow even if one pipe failed to function. During construction of a parallel sewer there is no need to pump around the section of sewer being relieved, it can continue to flow without interruption. If the same route is used. and the smaller pipe is replaced with a larger pipe, the chance of conflicting with parallel or crossing pipes is reduced. With one pipe, maintenance responsibilities are half that with two pipes and access is easier. One larger pipe can sometimes achieve a higher capacity and a higher velocity with the same slope than two smaller pipes at the same slope and the number of manholes required Is cut in half. Also. possible Inflow and Infiltration are less, since fewer pipe Joints are Involved. Pipe size selection for sewers tributary to the Slater Avenue Pump Station is based on a velocity .. of 2 feet per second. Bowing three-quarters full (D/d =0.75). This Is possible since Inverts of downstream pipes can be met and because it is desirable to reduce construction costs and pumping costs. Deep pipe excavation and high power costs must be mtrifni ed. Pipe size r selection for sewers Bowing from the pump station is based on the smallest diameter pipe that will fill the Bow deficiency at the slope of the deficient pipe. More precise hydraulic design will be made during the design phase to follow. r I1) CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineer 3-5 3.6 SEWERAGE TO THE PUMPING STATION Springdale - Slater Existing r Figure 3.1 shows both the Slater-Springdale Trunk Sewer(No. 1) and the Slater-Springdale Relief Sewer(No. 2)between Edinger Avenue and Slater Avenue. To avoid two siphons under the flood control channel, the two flows were combined into the Relief Sewer. Both sewers remain south of the channel, and they are reconnected there to take advantage of their total capacity. Plans show them connected at Warner Avenue and at Slater Avenue, but the Master Plan(l) does not consider the Trunk Sewer capacity south of the flood control channel. This report takes into account full capacity to both sewers. Capacities of each of the sewers and the total system are shown by reach In Figure 3-1. These are compared to projected flows In the last three columns. The data shows that there is a ` maximum deficiency of about 6.55 MOD at the flood control channel. There are also capacity deficiencies throughout most of this system all the way south to Slater Avenue and east to Golden West Street. r Alternative Routing To relieve these deficiencies, various alternatives based on Master Plan(l) flows are possible ` including the following: Alt. 1. Installing a new interceptor on Heil Avenue from Springdale Street east to Golden West Street. It would join a new Golden West Trunk Sewer at that point. Alt. 2. Removing the 36-inch existing Relief Sewer along Springdale Avenue (Trunk No. 2) ` and replacing It with a new 60-Inch pipe from Heil Avenue to Slater Avenue and east to Golden West Street. Alt. 3. Installing a new 57-inch sewer parallel to the existing 36-inch Relief Sewer (Trunk No. 2). The Trunk Sewer (No. 1) would be abandoned In place. r The main advantage of the Hell Avenue Interceptor Alternative 1. is Its length lone mLLe), compared to the 2-mile length for Alternatives 2 and 3. There is room in Hell Avenue to construct the Interceptor. It would be more difficult to construct a pipe In Springdale Avenue because of the two existing ones. The need to Improve the capacity of the Golden West Street sewerage adds to the advantages of the Heil Avenue interceptor since one new pipe in Heil Avenue and in Golden West Street can relieve capacity problems In both the Springdale-Slater System and the Golden West Trunk Sewer as well as eliminate the failing condition of the Golden West Trunk Sewer. By Inspection, the cost of Alternative 1 Is the least of the three routes. 11) CSDOC Master Plan - 1969 by Ca:ollo-Boyle Engineer 3.6 r 4 M" CNPIIO V TOTAL MAXOW RO. MA%W. TOTAL EXCESS F I1 02 WACKY I1 I2 FLOW FLOW EOINOER (um IN= IYOM IYOOI IMOW IYOtl 660 ;AVENUE _ s m: sAB 9.12 7.60 Toss 1.33 Q; 3.23 3.05 W• 856 W LL� B.m 9.12 ].{0 10.45 1.03 W W_. r HID! AVENUE W.-�% 6 J0, too 4.07 6.86 4.30 7.40 11.70 0.68 _ 656 IS O• 630 2• m� 5.33 7.05 12.38 4.30 7A0 1L7o 4.94 r F C 626 � 4.13 654 J• _ N IS 5.33 2.24 7.57 4.41 7.40 11.81 4.24 91 82 . 4.65 4.85 11.20 11.20 6.55 LAN D.C. ROOD CES CONTROL:`AI!ME 624 • 4.65 7.25• - 1120 11.2 3.85 r ~NM AVENUE 2.800 2.83 5.43• ^ 11.38 11. 5.95@ 82 H W • O `J O O • W 0 4.000 10.77 14.77• 0 10.63 18.36 3.88 s m � • surER AVENUE I¢II r i m e20 ®THE TO MASTER PLAN SHOUTS DECREASED FLAW POSSIBLY TO�m DUE LOWER PEAKING FACTOR r r 1. ®MAN HOLE NUMBER 7. ALL 9INFORMATION SHOWN IN THE FROM THE 1990 MASTER PUN.EXCEPT VE TA%E EXISTING VALUES INDICATED BY•;THESE VALUES ARE CSDOC SEWERS CALCULATED FROM CSDOC A9BUILT PLANS. 3. THE IBM MASTER PLAN DOES NOT RECOGNIZE SPRINGDALE STREET THE CAPACrIXOF SEWER SYSTEM s I FIGURE 3-1 SOUTH OF 620 NOR ANY FUTURE FLOWS IN IT. SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 3-7 All moiNG Flows Based on flows tabulated in Figure 3-1, alternatives for the extent of diversion are as follows: .. Alt. A. Intercept the maximum excess flow of 6.55 MGD from both the Slater-Springdale Relief Sewer and the Slater-Springdale Trunk Sewer at Heil Avenue. This would reduce most of the flows in those two sewers to their capacity all the way south to Slater Avenue and east to Golden West Street. As shown in Figure 3-2, only the 684 foot length of Slater-Springdale Relief Sewer east of Mayor Lane would be under capacity. This sewer between MH610 and MH612 was designed with an adequate slope but was built with a flatter slope than designed. Should maintenance of this length of sewer be a problem, 1320 feet of new 36-inch relief sewer could be installed at a steeper slope. Alt. B. At Heil Avenue intercept all the flows in both the Slater-Springdale Relief Trunk Sewer(7.40 MGD) and In the Slater-Springdale Trunk Sewer (3.05 MGD) at Heil Avenue for a total of 10.45 MGD. This alternative would remove all flow from both the 27-inch relief trunk and the 24-Inch trunk and muse the problems of odor and septic conditions associated with low velocities in the sewage pipes to the south. r Alt. C. Intercept all the flow at Heil Avenue and constructing new northbound sewers from the Flood Control Channel to Heil Avenue. This would have the advantages of eliminating the siphon, lowering the downstream flow as much as possible. and providing the maximum capacity south of the siphon but would cause odor problems there. Recommendations Alternative 1. the Heil Avenue Interceptor, is recommended to solve the major capacity deficiency problems. Diversion of 6.55 MGD, Alt. A. is recommended to provide the minimum relief while maintaining the adequate capacity in the system except for one Inadequate length. The diversion facility should be designed as a peak shaving device to permit passage of enough flow to maintain flushing velocities in the siphon under the flood control channel but to divert excess flows eastward In the above recommended Heil Avenue Interceptor. r Proposed Heil Avenue Interceptor Existing There Is no existing District sewer on Heil Avenue. 3-8 r 1 1 ( 1 l I e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l [ SLATER- SPRINGDALE SLATER AVENUE TRUNK SEWER a 27'0 _ 2T0 2T0 IIIIIIIIIL- IS8TS1 5-0.0007 •0.0008 - ' SLATER-SPRINGDALE1 38. 0 38. 0 6 38' 0p 36' 1D dwww www wwf� www www www�ww ISSRSI RELIEF SEWER ,-�s-o.00069 s-o.00075 s-o.00teo s-o.00tto o.000a/ 6-o.00tox \ �n z w m w J c 620 61B c 818 61d -a+ 612 610 ;� BOe o a zw w 3 i 9 w w � o 3967 L.F 881 LF. & D/d-.75 1 D/d-.92 1 D/d-.76 SSRS CAPACITY FROM M.P. 10.26 10.77 1e.71 19.01 9.70 12.67 m SSTS CAPACITY M.P. MASTER PLAN FROM PLANS MANHOLE e.84 6.97 6.8/ O TOTAL CAPACITY MANHOLE SSRS&SSTs 15.54 18.06 20.35 18.88 18.07 18.21 TOTAL FLOW 19.82 19.82 19.82 23.62 23.62 23.81 -FROM M.P. UNDER CAPACITY 4.28 3.76 - 4.94 7.55 5.60 FLOW DIVERTED 6.65 6.55 6.56 6.55 6.55 6.55 H EIL UNDER CAPACITY 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 W/FLOW DIVERTED EXCESS CAPACITY 2.27 z.79 7.08 1.61 - o.9s FLOWS IN MGD EXISTING CSDOC SEWERS SLATER AVENUE FIGURE 3-2 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Fl COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS JV'Ij/W_4 OF ORANGE COUNTY Altemattves The alternatives for the pipe size and capacities on Hell Avenue are shown In Tables 3-1 and 3-2 for a minimum slope and scouring velocity. As shown in Appendix A. the design is complicated by two large stone drams crossing Heil Avenue at Trudy Lane. They force the proposed sewer down to a lower elevation all the way to the pumping station. The interceptor from Hell Avenue to Trudy Lane could be either a 36-inch diameter pipe at a moderate slope and velocity or a 42-inch or 48-inch diameter pipe. .. Recommendaflons The recommended pipe sizes on Heil Avenue are a 27-Inch pipe east to Trudy Lane and a 36-inch pipe from there to Golden West Street. Special pipe bedding techniques may be required along Heil Avenue Just east of Springdale Avenue due to reported poor soil conditions. After subsurface investigations, pipe supports can be designed and estimated. The diversion structure will provide flexibility to allow yearly adjustment of the eastward bound diverted flows to Heil Avenue to permit scouring flows to flow southward in the Springdale Avenue pipes and siphon, but to avoid surcharging them. Golden West meet Existing d According to the Master Plan(l). the 12-inch sewer north of Heil Avenue has adequate capacity. The Plan(l) reports that the existing 15-inch diameter Golden West Trunk Sewer from Heil Avenue south to Slater Avenue will be overloaded at the design flows. Also, the sewer has deteriorated as previously discussed. The addition of 6.55 MGD from Springdale Avenue at Heil Avenue together with the 2.76 MGD forecast from the north will require increasing the capacity of that sewer from 0.89 MGD to about 9.5 MGD. The further addition of 0.4 MGD at Wainer Avenue will require increasing the capacity south of ,r Wainer Avenue to about 10 MGD. Atiernatives This overloading can be corrected by either of the following alternatives: 1. Installing a parallel relief sewer 2. Removing the existing sewer and replacing It with a larger pipe- 3-10 TABLE 3-1 ALTERNATIVE PIPE SIZES TO CARRY 6.55 MGD Velocity Pipe Diameter Slope feet/minute hashes (3) (2) 21 .005 5.28 _ 24 .0024 4.00 27 .0013 3.19 30 .00074 2.58 36 .00035 Say 2.0 TARIX 3-2 ALTERNATIVE PrPE CAPAcrrms AT mumsum SLOPE(') Maximum Minimum Flow Rate Pipe Diameter Slope MGD itches (2) (3) 27 .0005 4.06 30 .000" 5.07 33 .00039 6.13 36 .00035 7.31 ,r 42 .00028 9.85 48 .00024 13.11 (1) D/d= .75.velocity=2 fps Manning N=0.013 r (2) V = 1.486 R2/3 51/2 n for D of.75 R= .302 d .r d (3) Q = K D8/3 51/2 x .646 MGD n cIs for D of.75 K= .91 a 3-11 s The advantages of each option are listed earlier in Section 3.5 of this report. The alternatives for the pipe size, and flow rate are shown in Table 3-1 for minimum slope and scouring velocity. Recommendation Since there are few connections to the existing 15-inch pipe and its capacity is so low compared to the need. it is recommended that the existing pipe be removed and in its place a 42-inch diameter pipe be installed. Pumpina Station Influent Existing The 33-inch diameter Slater Avenue Pump Station influent pipe between Golden West Street and the pumping station will be severely overloaded by predicted flows of 28.31 MGD since the present capacity is reported to be 15.29 MGD. The predicted overload will be about 13 MGD. AltemaHves The projected overloading can be eliminated by either of the following alternatives: Alt. 1. Install a parallel relief sewer and balance the flows between the two pipes. d Alt. 2. Remove the existing 33-inch diameter sewer and replace it with a sewer at a flatter slope. As shown in Tables 3-3 and 3-4. a new pipe carrying the total flow not more than 75 percent full at mlmmum slope would need to be at least 60-inch diameter while a parallel relief sewer could be 42-inch diameter at greater than minimum slope. Regardless of the alternative chosen. special pipe foundation design may be required on Slater d Avenue north of Lake Talbert because of reported poor sod conditions. Recommendations Since the existing sewer has over half the capacity needed for the future. it Is recommended that It remain in place and that a new 42-inch diameter parallel sewer be constructed between -� Golden West Street and the existing manhole on Slater Avenue about 150 feet west of the evl Ctntg pumping station. From that manhole. both the existing 33-inch diameter and the new 42-inch diameter pipes join to a 72-inch diameter new sewer to the new pumping station. 3-12 TABLE 3-3 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION r INPLIIENT SEWER REPLACEMENT FLOW-28.3I.IIGD(I) Pipe Diameter Slope Velocity inches feet/foot(3) feet/second(2) r 36 .0122 11.8 42 .0054 8.7 r 48 .0026 6.6 54 .0014 5.3 r 60 .00081 4.3 72 .00031 3.0 r D/d= .75 (1) Equatlon 1 (2) Equation 2 TABLE 3-4 PARALLEL R r FLOW- IS I Pipe r diameter Slope Velocity inches feet/foot(3) feet/second(2) r 24 .0094 7.9 27 .005 6.2 r 30 .0029 5.1 33 .0017 4.1 r 36 .001 3.4 42 .00048 2.6 48 .00024 2.00 r (1) D/d= .75 r (2) V = 1.486 R2/3 Sl/2 n r for D of.75 R= .302 d d (3) Q = K De,J SI/2 x .646 MGD n cis r for D of.75 K= .91 a 3-13 r 3.7 SEWERAGE FROM THE PUMPING STATION General ,y As previously stated, the goals of the piping east of the pumping station are twofold: 1. To carry the anticipated flow rates in a fume main and gravity sewers: 2. To divert 5.4 MGD (average flow) from the Knott system to the Miller-Holder system. The 5.4 MGD of average flow is equivalent to 7.0 MGD at maximum flow('). w There are many possible combinations of force mains and sewer improvements that can effect these two goals. Force main options include pumping to Gothard Street or to Nichols Street. Gravity sewer options include parallel sewers or replacement sewers. Flows may be diverted at Nichols Street. at Magnolia Street or at both locations. All the elements must be considered together in each of the options as shown.but first each of the elements must be understood by themselves. Slater Avenue Pumping Station Force Main Existing ' At this time, the Slater Avenue Pump Station can pump into either or both of two 24-inch diameter force mains (depending on valve positions on the pumping manifold) to Gothard Street where Diversion Structure No. 28 connects to two parallel gravity sewers discussed later in this Section. The newer 24-inch diameter force main was installed in 1981-82 and is south of the older 24-inch diameter force main. According to direction front the District: 'The newer of the two existing force mains and gravity sewers between the pump station and Nichols Street shall be considered as future standby. The older existing force main and gravity sewer may be abandoned In place or removed and disposed of in accordance with District policy where the new force main and/or gravity sewer are to be installed in the same alignment." Alternatives With a predicted maximum flow rate of 28.31 MGD and the above quoted direction, the alternatives for force main length are as follows: r 3-14 Alt. 1 Install a new 36-inch force main to Nichols Street Alt. 2 Install a new force main to Gothard Street and a new gravity sewer to Nichols Street. .� Pumping through a new 36-Inch diameter from the pump station all the way to Nichols Street would leave an existing 30-Inch diameter Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer carrying only the flow from 480 feet of 8-inch diameter City of Huntington Beach Sewer. These small flows will not flush the 30-inch diameter sewer and will cause odor problems. As shown in Table 3-5. and Appendix A. extending the force main below Slater Avenue past the high point at Gothard Street all the way to Nichols Street would add about 1,330 mom feet of force mam for a total of about 2,300 feet. Force main size alternatives am shown In Table 3-6. Connecting to the existing gravity sewer at elevation 20 at Nichols Street would save pumping a vertical distance of 5 feet to pump to elevation 25 at Gothard Street. As shown In Table 3-7. annualized construction costs for the tome main and for the force ream and gravity sewer with manholes are comparable.but pumping costs over a 20-year period for the long fore main are almost$4.300 a year less. Recoffmmndaffom It Is recommended that a force main be constructed to carry the Slater Avenue Pump Station effluent to Gothard Street. The recommended diameter of the force main is 36-inches. r Slater Avenue From Gothwd Street to Nichols Sheet Existing Flows from adjacent buildings contribute to the sewers in this area r Between the east end of the force main at Gothard Street and the Southern Pacific Transportation Company(SPTC) railroad spur, there are two 30-inch pipes. One is the Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer (Contract 11-10.11. The other is the Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer r (Contract 11-10-2). Each has a slope of 0.004 and a capacity of 12.9 MOD with D/d of.75. Under the SPEC.the older(1966) 30-mch VCP has a slope of 0.028 and a capacity of 35 MGD .. at D/d= .75. The newer(1973) 30-inch VCP has a slope of 0.004 and a capacity of 12.9 MGD at D/d= .75. Between SPTC and Nichols Street. the older 30-Inch VCP has a slope of.0039 and a capacity of 12.8 MGD at D/d of 0.75. The newer 30-Inch VCP has a slope of 0.004 (not 0.008 as reported In the Master Plant 1)) and a capacity of 12.9 MGD at D/d of.75, Ill CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Camllo-Boyle Engineer 3-15 TABLE 3-8 FORCE MAIN HYDRAULICS FOR ECONOMIC COMPARISON ONLY(l) Force Pump Total Main Center F.M. Static Pipe Dynamic Length Line Invert Lift Losses Head Alt. ft. Elev. Elev. ft. ft. ft. r 1 Face Main to 2300 -22 20 42 5 47 r, Nichols St. 2 Force Main to 1000 -22 25 47 2 49 Gothard St. and Gravity Sewer to Nichols Street ti (1) Power Cost = Q x h x .746 x $0.06 x 365 3960 x .7 W 9 = average flow of 14.000 gpm TABLE 3-6 FORCE MAIN PIPE SIZE ALTERNATIVES Force Main Velocity diameter feet/ inches second r 30 9.08 36 6.30 42 4.63 d 3-16 TABLE 3-7 FORCE MAIN COMPARISON ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST Annual Pumping Construction Costs(1) Annualized Total Ene Gravity Force Sub Construction Annual All. Cost Sewer Main Total Costl31 Cost 1 36"Fone main from pump $93.035 $751.000 $751,000 $76.527 $169,562 station to Nichols St., (2300 Lf) 2 36"Forrc main from pump $96.991 $244.800)4) slallon to Gothard St.. 11000 L0 w and $754.200 $76.853 $173,844 36"Gravity sewer from $509 400(4) Gothard St. to Nichols SL, 1300 Lf Based on: I. Master Plan construction costs adjusted to project conditions 2. 60 per KW-hr. 3. 20-year, 8 percent interest rate 4. Al a shallower depth Except for the short railroad crossing, the combined capacity of the two 30-inch diameter gravity sewers between Gothard Street and Nichols Street is insufttctent to carry the flows from the proposed pump station. In the previous section, It was recommended that a new 36-inch diameter sewer perform that function and serve the adjacent tributary sewers as well. u Diversion Structure Diverting 5.4 MGD (average flow) from the Slater Avenue Trunk Extension to the Nichols Street Gravity Sewer will require a structure capable of reasonably constant diversion of that flow northward while permitting the remaining flow from the Slater Avenue Pump Station to .w continue eastward in the Slater Avenue Sewers. This can be achieved by Installing stop logs of adjustable height and depth to partially data the eastward Slater Avenue flow and divert a limited flow northward up Nichols Street. The northward flow will go under one set of stop logs s and the eastward flow will go over another set of logs. Since this diversion has financial Implications, the adjustment of the diversion should be made initially and checked and the diversion should be checked routinely (about every year) to ensure reasonable accuracy. ry Routine maintenance should be provided by CSDOC commensurate with the number of problems found in the operation of this diversion structure. V Slater Avenue From Nichols Sheet to Newland Sheet Nichols Street to West of Koledo Lane w Between Nichols Street and the manhole 68 feet west of Koledo Lane, the existing 36-inch Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension (SATSE) at a slope of .01030 has a capacity of .. 39.89 MGD(1) at D/d = .75. The maximum flow will be 21.31 MGD(1) since 7.0 MGD maximum flow (5.4 MGD average flow) is diverted from 28.31 MGD. No improvement is necessary. West of Koledo Lone to Beach Boulevard From Manhole No. 600 west of Koledo Lane east to Beach Boulevard, the existing 42-inch SATSE at a slope of .00074 has a capacity of 14.3 MGD(I) at D/d of .75. With diversion of 5.4 MGD (average flow) at Nichols Street. the maximum flow will be 21.31 MGD(1). The alternative solutions to the 7 MGD deficiency are shown in Table 3-8. Paralleling the 42-Inch SATSE with 1200 feet of 33-Inch SATSE, the recommended alternative, would cost about $561.600. Replacing the 42-Inch sewer with 1200 feet of 48-Inch sewer would cost about 5840.000. r (1) CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineer d 3-18 TABLE 3-8 CONBTRucITON cons or ALTERNATIVE niuwvlsmmm To SEWERSM ON SLATER AVENUE BETWEEN NICHOLS STREET AND MAGNOLIA STREET Without Diversion of With Diversion of 5.4 MGD(avg. flow)0 Nichols St. 5.4 MGD (avg.flow) 0 Nichols St. Parallel Facility Sewer(3) Seweri"r S Parallel) R Sewe,(3 a Nichols Street (5) (5) (5) (5) Nichols Street to West of Koledo Lane (5) (5) (5) (5) West of Koledo Lane to Beach Boulevard $ 728.400 $ 949.200 $ 561.600(2) $ 840,000 er Beach Boulevard to Newland Street $1.609.000 $2.096.000 $1.362.100(2) $2.096.150 R Newland Street to Magnolia Street $1.010.000 N/A(4) 0(2) 0 (Knott Interceptor) Diversion Structure $ 350.000 •- $ 91.000(2) -- 0 Magnolia Street ® Nichols Street (1) EPA LA Index of 312 (2) Recommended Alternative (3) Parallel and replacement sewers at D/d=0.75 (4) Not considered because of replacement pipe size (5) No improvement required r 3.19 Without diversion of 5.4 MOD (average flow) at Nichols Street. the maximum flow will be s 26.7 MOD. Paralleling the 42-inch SATSE with 1200 feet of 33-inch sewer would cost about $561.600. Replacing the 42-inch SATSE with 1200 feet of 54-inch sewer would cost about $949.200. Beach Boulevard to Newland Sheet s From Beach Boulevard east to Newland Street. the existing 42-inch SATSE at a slope of 0.00074 has a capacity of 14.3 MOD(I) at D/d of.75. With diversion of 5.4 MOD (average flow) at Nichols Street,the maatmum flow will be 23.56 MGDII) and alternative solutions(1) and(2) e' am considered: (1) Paralleling the 42-Inch SATSE with 2650 feet of 36-inch relief sewer, the recommended solution would cost about$1.362.100. (2) Replacing the 42-inch SATSE with 2650 feet of 54-inch sewer would cost about $2.096,150. Costs of these alternatives are shown in Table 3-5. Without diversion of 5.4 MOD (average flow) at Nichols Street the maximum flow will be 30.56 MOD and alternative solutions(3)and(4) are considered: uU (3) Paralleling the 42-inch SATSE with 2650 feet of 42-inch sewer would cost about r $1,609,000. (4) Replacing the 42-Inch SATSE with 2650 feet of 54-inch pipe would cost about .r $2.096.000. Shier Avenue atom Newland Sheet to Maanolla Sheaf The Knott Interceptor carries sewage from Newland Street to Magnolia Street. On Slater Avenue.It Is 96 inches in diameter, has a slope of.0046 and a capacity of 136.53 MGD(I). With diversion of 5.4 MOD (average flow) at Nichols Street, the future flows will be 133.89 MGD(I) and no improvement will be needed. This Is the recommended solution shown s In Table 3-5. Without diversion of 5.4 MOD (average flow) at Nichols Street. the future flows will be 139.29 MOD and alternative solutions (1) and (2) are considered. (1) It would require a D/d of.95 to provide the capacity for anticipated flows. (1) CSDOC Master Plan- 1989 by Camflo-Boyle Engineer 3-20 r (2) Paralleling the 96-inch trunk with 2400 feet of 30-Inch sewer would cost about $1,010,000. Summary As shown in Table 3-5. It 1s recommended that the 5.4 MGD (average flow) be diverted to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at Nichols Street and that a parallel sewer be constructed between s Beach Boulevard and Newland Street and that a parallel sewer be constructed west from Beach Boulevard to Manhole No. 600 which Is 68 feet west of Koledo Lane. No gravity sewer Improvements are recommended on Slater Avenue between the Slater Avenue Pumping Station s and Manhole No. 600 nor are any recommended east of Newland Street. Nichols Sheet Exi Hng t+ - The existing Nichols Street sewer flowing from south to north from Slater Avenue to Warner Avenue, has the characteristics shown in Table 3-9. This table also shows existing side connections to the pipe. As previously stated in this Chapter. It has been reported that the sewer was in need of repair, but based on recent televising, only manhole flow lines are in need of rehabilitation. w CSDOC will permit this sewer to operate at D/d of.92. ` Recommendations It Is recommended that the manhole Bow lines be rehabilitated as part of routine District maintenance. Since the existing sewer will carry a maximum flow of 7.0 MGD at D/d of .92, there is no deficiency and no need for major construction. r 3.8 SUMMARY The recommended solutions to carry predicted future maximum flows are shown in Figure 3-3. ti 3.9 UTILITY SEARCH The utility search activities Involved in this study included the following: 1. Surveying existing utility and street improvement plans to locate previously plotted .� underground facilities. r 3-21 TABLE 3-9 s CAPACIT4 OF EXISTING 24-INCH NICHOLS STREET GRAVITY SEWER, Length of Capacity at D/d oft') Reach Slope .75 .80 .85 .92 1_0 feet feet/foot K=.91 I(Z,82 K=.74 K=.62 K=.46 ~ MGD(1) Slater Ave. Less than 5.4 MGD More than 5.4 MGD South End average flow and 7.0 average flow and 7.0 MGD ma damn flow MGD maximum flow 663 0.0021 6.1 6.5 6.9 7.2 6.7 w •• i 300 0.0028 7.03 7.5 7.9 8.3 7.7 V • 350 0.0026 6.78 7.3 7.6 8.0 7.4 w •and• 650 0.0061 10.4 11.1 11.7 12.2 11.4 e" 635 0.0057 10.0 10.8 11.3 11.8 I1.0 North End Warner Ave. Denotes 12-inch sewer connection on west side of manhole •• Denotes east and west 12-Inch stubs constructed at manholes in 1966. es (1) g = K Ds/e St/2 x .646 MGD n fs for D of.75 K= .91 a 3-22 m ' E 21• 13.23 13.05 27' 6.19 z z 'z 'm 2 0 114 1/2 MILE 1LL APPROXIMATE SCALE W W w 3 w ;5 y � z 24• 11.89 14.30 ' 27' 1 4.97 cc RELIEVE WITH HEIL F- ' RELIEVE WITH AVE RELIEF SEWER ' RELIEF SEA ' 98' 1114.911121.59 2 24'&36' ].25 F 1 60' 161.21 150.91 RELIEVE W/HE w RELIEF SEV '- 62 , m /ER W ,J 2836 5.43 ' J aAE1.lEYE WITI 128 1 2 126 IIZ RELIEFS 114.87 '_ 72• 161J31 51.73 ' 62 224'836' 14.]7 21R ** � ' a 77y�C�_RELIEVE W/ 1 < 1- O RELIEF SE' 3 IF z W Q RELIEVE W/ 'Y •� RELIEF SE ' w VSLATER-SF 2 124 ' ,�� s Im. ►���i�i��OB) SLATER 1S AVE 3 98' 1136.531133.89 �1 138' 2T836' 1 '1 RELIEVI INTE '\ zra36116.54119.62 y RELIEVE /W HEIL AVE INTERCEPTOR SLATER AVE. PUMP STATION 0 0 a COLLECTION SYSTEM RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS a FIGURE 3-3 c 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY !3 w ..r 2. Contacting the Underground Service Alert to secure their list of all underground av utility owners in the area. 3. Personally meeting with the major utility owners at their offices and securing hard r copies of their utility plans for the streets involved. 4. Requesting and securing hard copies of plans from owners of relatively minor e. utilities. 5. Organizing and indexing all the plans. 6. Plotting all the above information on plan, profile.and moss-section sheets. 7. Field checking the plans with a visual inspection of the streets for which improvements were considered. "• S. Sending plans and praflles to major utility owners for their checking and cornment• 9. Making corrections suggested by the major utility owners. 10. Providing written certification of the on-site inspection of the utilities. 11. Documenting the above material. The results of the utility search are shown in the Appendices as follows: Material Appendix •+ Plans. profiles and cross-sections A Utility certification letter C r List of utilities contacted and D Index to plans in JCE files r 3.10 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN Traffic control and detour plans will be based on the manual of Traffic Controls for ronstructlon and Maintenance Work Zones. Chapter 5 of CALTRANS Traffic Manual (1985 w Revision) with specific application to the project based on engineering judgement for the particular conditions along the highways involved. Additional City requirements will also have to be met The estimated cost of the project has been factored up to include traffic control. r Traffic control should maintain safe and reasonable access to the commercial properties along the route to prevent hardship to the proprietors. r 3.24 Because of the high volumes of traffic on Golden West Street. Slater Avenue and Beach .,v Boulevard, hours of construction on these highways should be limited to between 9:00 A.M. and 3:30 P.M. e The City of Huntington Beach will require that construction along Golden West Street and around Beach Boulevard must be limited to avoid impact on traffic to and from the Pacific Ocean beaches on summer weekends. w The excavations for all of the trenches will be sheeted or shielded to maintain the open trench without excessive excavation required for laid-back trench sides. Concrete barriers should be used to deter vehicles from entering the zone of constriction outside the sheeting. Manhole construction will require widened sheeted trenches and narrowed through highway lanes. Along Golden West Street where the trench will be in the middle of the 6-lane road, the City of Huntington Beach will not permit closing of more than 2 lanes of traffic. In addition to other traffic control procedures recommended by CALTRANS and adopted by the City, arrow boards and Type II barricades must be employed and the City noise ordinance must be followed. Along parts of Slater Avenue, new sewer construction will involve both shallow and deep cut for the force main and medium deep cut for the gravity sewer. The routes for these pipes will be on either side of the road center line and in some places the routes crass the street from one side to the other. According to Mr. Bruce Gilmer.Traffic Engineer, the City of Huntington Beach is in the process of Improving Warner Avenue. Therefore, boring and Jacking under the new paving at Golden West Street should be considered. Because of the general improvement to Warner Avenue, it is felt that some of the present Slater Avenue drivers will move to Warner Avenue. somewhat relieving potential constructlon problems on Slater Avenue. 3.11 STREET RECONSTRUCTION .r CSDOC are committed to rehabilitating the existing roads and utilities to equal or better condition than before construction. Generally, streets will be repaved from curb to curb with paving systems meeting City standards and CSDOC Standard Specifications. w According to Mr. Tony Folaron. Civil Engineering Assistant, the City of Huntington Beach plans to add some center dividers and about 1-1/2 inches of asphalt concrete to the top of the Golden West Street pavement from curb to curb. The project plans include the length of Golden West Street from the Pacific Coast Highway to Warner Avenue but since the length between Slater Avenue and Warner Avenue is in relatively good condition and project funding 3-25 may not permit repaving the entire length, the length of the proposed 42-Inch sewer �.. recommended herem may not be included in the City's repaving project. Another reason for not including that length in the paving project is the tiring involved. The City plans to pave in Spring 1990 and good planning would preclude removing and replacing the new pavement for sewer construction within the following year. Present City repaving plans show about 1000 feet of center divider proposed just north of c, Slater Avenue. if the length of Golden West Street from Slater Avenue to Warner Avenue is not repaved by the City, the Districts should consider construction of the divider and curb-tocurb pavement as part of their sewer Improvement project. Communication between the Districts a and the City should continue In this regard. CSDOC should pursue the possibility of entering into a cooperative agreement with the City of Huntington Beach to rebuild Slater Avenue. particularly the intersection at Golden West Street. ry 3-26 r CHAPTER 4 Chapter 4 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION ANALYSIS 4.1 INTRODUCTION Existing Station a The existing underground pumping station Is located on an easement from GTE. An additional plot has been leased from GTE for a standby generator. The site plan is shown in Figure 4-1 and a copy of the lease and the easement agreement are both in Appendix E. r The pumping station Is about 25 years old and the pumping capacity does not meet the protected peak flow of 28.31 MGD. The pump station is not large enough (wet well/dry well) to accommodate the expansion. Standby power Is provided by a "low noise" trailer-mounted generator with auto start and transfer. The present site layout fails to meet the District's access criteria to provide the following: 1. Easy transition from a driving lane, across the curb line and sidewalk, to a stopping .. pad clear of the sidewalk. 2. Access to gates that open clear of the stopping pad. r 3. Parking for more than one vehicle inside the gate and fence. r 4. Easy exit with the same gate, stopping pad. and sidewalk requirements. Expansion Criteria Guidelines in considering the replacement of this station include the following: r 1. A peak flow rate of 28.31 MGD as stated In the Master Plan with the flexibility provided by one standby pump and proportionally large wet well so that final ,. revisions to peak flow can be accommodated. 2. New reliability criteria for pumping stations printed in the Master Plan and r summarized in Appendix G. 3. District experience with other equipment and methods. r 4. A desire for uniformity of equipment parts and procedures among the Districts' pumping stations. r 4-1 r r SLATER AVENUE NO SCALE 9921 x vl xnx A o >�x1''w - SLATER: AVE. At1 2 1f PAa Wjk/AGE A+UMA/AG �9 J yym yk 4 x .: STATION 33 D A N wli r Cac. CORO 4 (n 22' 23' al'R Qp MCNAW v`�1 LWK F6NCE l GENERAL 7-EL6PNONE PROPEA3TY LEASED SITE 10167 FROM: SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SITE PLAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF FIGURE 4-1 ORANGE COUNTY AND GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. TO LEASE SITE. SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS JVtvIL�.Y OF ORANGE COUNTY r r 5. A 36-inch diameter effluent force main to Nichols Street as discussed in Chapter 3. r 6. Requirements of the City of Huntington Beach. 7. Relative availability of land acquired from GTE. 8. On-site standby power generation. 4.2 PUMPS General Pump selection has considered a varying number of pumps, the desirable pump configuration and rotative speed, and the possible reuse of existing units. Among the alternatives considered are the following: 1. The number and sequencing of operating and standby pumps; r 2. The use of existing pumps with modifications; r 3. The use of existing motors; 4. Replacement with new pumps,motors and drives; 5. The use of pumps that are reliable, require relatively easy maintenance, and have been used previously by the Districts. r Recommendations are made regarding all of the listed options. r System Head Curve The modified system head curve for the pumping station is shown In Figure 4-2. It is based on a maximum flow of 28.31 MGD pumped up to Gothard Street through a 36-Inch DIP force main. The static heads take into account the inverts of the influent interceptors and the high point of the force main at Gothard Street as discussed in Chapter 3 and shown on the r preliminary profiles (Appendix A). Friction losses are based on a Hazen-Williams coefficient of C=100, which is a conservative value for ductile iron pipe. The maximum pumping head Is estimated at 54.0 feet at about 19.660 gallons per minute (gpml. The modified system head curve is the friction loss in the common force main shared by pumps r that operate in parallel. The friction losses in the suction and discharge piping of individual pumps Is subtracted from the individual pump head-capacity curves to obtain modified pump head-capacity curves. 4-3 65 55 LU W LL_ p 50 2 W S A A 45 40- - 35-t-4 F I- I I 0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24600 28000 32000 GPM MODIFIED SYSTEM HEAD CURVE FIGURE 4-2 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Number of Pumps mid Flow Rotes At a maximum flow rate of 28.31 MGD or 19.660 gpm, the options for the number of pumps are as follows: Number of Pumps Maximum Rate Pumps of Flow per Pump opera tirra Standby Total am 2 1 3 9830 3 1 4 6553 ' 4 1 5 4915 5 1 6 3932 6 1 7 3276 A total of 3 pumps may not provide sufficient reliability, as each operating pump must be able to handle 50 percent of the flow with one pump out of service and 100 percent of the flow with two pumps out of service. The added reliability of 6 or 7 pumps is not Justified with respect to pump, electrical control, and added dry well cost. A pumping station with a total of five pumps is recommended. Providing three variable-speed pumps and two constant-speed pumps, for a total of five pumps would meet the reliability requirements and would be similar to the Main Street pumping station which has two variable-speed pumps and three constant-speed pumps. .. Existing Pumps The five existing pumps at Slater Avenue are Fairbanks Morse (FM) Series 5400. vertical. non-clog. dry pit pumps similar to those shown at the top of Figure 4-3. Their model, size, and rated output are shown below. Pump curves are shown in Appendix F. Impeller Rated Existing Model Size Capacity TDH Speed Pump No. No. Inches �m_ feet (RPM) 1 5415 20.75 3500 45 890 2 5415 17.25 3500 45 900 3 5415 18 3000 45 880 4 5415 18.75 3000 45 880 5 5415 18.125 3500 45 860 In review of the above tabulation, none of the existing pumps can be reused unless they are refurbished to meet the capacity and head requirements for a ftve-pump station. r 4-5 w r r EXISTING PUMPS @SLATER AVE. P.S. VERTICAL DRY PIT NON-CLOG PUMPS, SERIES 5410 r I 1 r r I I r PUMPS INSTALLED AT MAIN STREET P.S. -, VERTICAL DRY PIT ANGLEFLOW PUMPS SERIES 5700 FAIRBANKS-MORSE PUMPS FIGURE 4-3 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY y 4-6 Standardization of Pump Models r Like most of the recently installed pumps in other CSDOC pumping stations, the existing pumps at Slater Avenue are F-M Model Number 5415, non-clog. vertical dry pit pumps. Other r F-M pumps recently installed at the Main Street Pumping Station are from their 5700 Series shown in the bottom half of Figure 4-3. The latter are slightly more expenstve, but are more efficient, more adaptable, and the series has higher capacity range than the 5400 Series. r Series 5700 pump curves, in the range that would be applicable for the new station, are reproduced in Appendix F. Since there am other Series 5700 pumps in the CSDOC system, all could be applicable for this project. Alternatives for the New Station The alternatives for choosing the five pumps include the use of new or existing pumps and, in r the case of new pumps, use of Series 5400 or 5700 models. Selected alternatives are listed below. r Alternative 1 - Use five new Series 5700 pumps similar to those installed at the Main Street Pumping Station. ^' - The Model 5713/14-inch full-bore pumps would have 23-inch diameter impellers connected to 125 horsepower motors operating at 705 rpm. r - The pumps would be about 75 percent efficient at average flows. Figure 4-4 shows the modified pump curves and the modified system head curve. Alternative 2 - Refurbish the existing F-M 'Tndel 5415/8-inch pumps to meet the new 9 and TDH requirements of a 5-pump station. r - The Model 5415/8-inch pumps would have 17-mch diameter impellers connected to 125 horsepower motors to run at 1160 rpm. r - Two of the five refurbished pumps would be operated by variable speed drives. - The refurbished pumps would be about 73 percent efficient at average now. 4-7 ti 1 ! 7 ! 1 1 1 I ( 1 1 t 1 4 ! 1 1 o pGsY OV 60 q S V, 55 1k q N 1- N t �y LUtot IL ; TB O 50 Q W A y N 45 40 - Legend PUMPS :FAIRBANKS MORSE 5713/14" 705 RPM, 110 HP 35 0 4000 6000 12000 16000 20000 24000 26000 3200C GPM SEWAGE PUMP PERFORMANCE ALTERNATIVE 1 FIGURE 4-4 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Alternative 3 - Refurbish existing F-M Model 5415/8-mch pumps to meet the new 9 and TDH requirements. - The Model 5415/10-inch pumps would have 20-inch diameter impellers connected to 100 horsepower motors operating at 870 rpm. - The pumps would be about 78 percent efficient at average flows. - Figure 4-5 shows the modified pump curves and the modified system head curve. Alternative 4 - Use five new F-M Model 5415/10-inch pumps similar to those now at the Slater Avenue Pumping Station. m The pump's impeller diameter, horsepower rating, operating speed, and efficiency are the same as Alternative 3. - Figure 4-5 shows the modified pump curves and the modified system head curve. Recommendations .. It is recommended that five new 5700 Series pumps similar to those at the Main Street Pumping Station be installed. These new pumps are recommended for the following reasons: 1. The past 5 years have seen a pronounced increase in major maintenance as shown in the following excerpt from the Master Plan: r Maintenance Summary Slater Avenue Pumping Station r Date Service October 1973 Rebuilt Pump 3 and motor October 1979 Installed new packing in Pump 3 March 1985 Rebuilt bearing head. installed new volute, suction head, and impeller for Pump 5 April 1985 Replaced bearing head, installed new r impeller in Pump 1 4-9 I ( 1 1 1 ! [ 1 [ l I l [ l l [ 1 [ l 65 G � G 3 $ +s s 60 V� g N a 9 p N V 9 55 ~ o w w LL $ y p 50 Q W A = o LEGEND 45 PUMPS: FAIRBANKS MORSE 5415/10' 870 RPM, 100HP 40 35 0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24000 28000 32000 GPM SEWAGE PUMP PERFORMANCE ALTERNATIVE 3 FIGURE 4-5 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS CJ'/VI`J_Y; OF ORANGE COUNTY r September 1985 Replaced bearing head, installed new Impeller in Pump 4 December 1986 Installed new impeller,replaced bearing head in Pump 2 July 1987 Installed new motor on Pump 5 r 1989 Installed new larger pump in replace of Pump 1 2. Maintaining station reliability during the construction process will be much more difficult If existing pumps have to be disconnected from existing piping, moved and Installed in new piping and existing motors have to be disconnected moved and Installed in a new system all while operating two pumping stations and two sets of influent and effluent piping. r 3. Any cost savings realized by not purchasing new pumps will be offset by the Inconvenience, reflected In higher bid prices for the construction sequencing ,r mentioned in Item No. 3 above. 4. During the weeks involved in the process of having the existing pump impellers .. trimmed, the pumps will not be available at the station. New Series 5700 pumps are recommended because these pumps are used at the Main Street r pumping sta0= and the Districts'maintenance personnel find the pumps to be reliable with relatively easy maintenance. r It Is recommended that 2 or 3 of the 5 pumps be equipped for variable-speed operation. r 4.3 POWER Service r The existing pumping station receives electric service from Southern California Edison, underground, through 3 - 4-inch diameter conduits containing eighteen 300 MCM cables. The r service is 3-phase, 480 volt and 1s based on an ultimate motor load of 605 horsepower. With respect to pump loads and auxiliary loads, an upsized service of 1000/1250 kVA will be r required. The existing main breaker size Is 50 amps. MCC compartments are sized for 5-120 horsepower starters and circuit breakers. However, based on the age of existing units and construction sequencing restraints, new MCCs are recommended. r 4-I1 r Stand-by Power Generator The CSDOC has determined that system reliability can best be achieved by Installing a permanently mounted stand-by diesel engine/generator set in an above-gmund building at the pumping station. The starting loads or four 125 horsepower motors and other station equipment will require a 600 KW diesel engine driven generator similar to equipment currently operated in the Districts' treatment facilities. The final decision should consider models with the lowest possible emissions to maximize the operating time under AQMD's New Source limits. The overall size of the generator set is about 12 feet long, 5 feet wide and 8 feet high. The structure enclosing the power plant should have 3-4 feet clear around the equipment and should be about 25 feet by 15 feet to allow for wall-mounted equipment. The cooling system, exhaust. and room should all be designed to mmmize noise and vibration Impact. 4.4 STRUCTURE Criteria The CSDOC has decided that the pump station will be an above-ground structure with an exterior architecturally designed to enhance the area. All major electrical equipment and motors will be housed above street level for reliability. The architectural treatment of the pumping station structure above grade must be attractive for the industrial setting of the GTE property on which it will be built. but must also be in keeping with the residences on the north side of Slater Avenue and pleasing to the drivers passing on that street. r The structure Itself and connections to it will be designed to meet applicable seismic and other building and fire codes. Lifting rings and a portable A-frame and tackle will be used to remove and replace large equipment pieces through floor openings. Adequate door and/or roof openings will be included to permit access to the building to move large material. Room Meshes will be selected to provide safe and easily cleanable surfaces in the workspaces. The wet well should be designed In accordance with Hydraulic Institute standards for dimensions based on pump flows. 4-12 Ventilation The dry well part of the building will have no open connections to the wet well. Ventilation equipment for the dry well volumes will provide for six air changes an hour when personnel are _ present, and will operate on a timer when no personnel are present. Outside air will be forced down to lowers at the lowest level by low noise fans and will exhaust through gravity louvers at the upper levels. Since the wet well will house no mechanical equipment requiring routine maintenance, It will not be power ventilated. Employees entering the wet well should take precautions required in confined spaces. The Districts have spenenee and procedures,for this type of work size r The motor and pump part of the station should provide ample room around equipment for servicing and removal. The pumps will be about 8 feet center to center and the stair slope will be within OSHA standards with adequate landings. The outside pump station building dimensions will be approximately 60 feet by 30 feet. .. The bottom of the pump room slab will be at about elevation minus 30. The motor room elevation will be about elevation 6.0 which is at least 6 inches above the highest adjacent grade. This is 5 feet above the 100-year base flood elevation. The inside height of the motor room will be about 14 feet dear. As previously mentioned, the stand-by power generator enclosure will be about 25 feet by 15 s feet and it should be adjacent to but separated from the motor room. The wet well size will be based on a maximum flow rate of 28.31 MGD or about 19.650 gallons a minute. It will be divided Into two connected, but valved, parts for cleaning. Each part will be accessible from the ground above. Wet well piping will include a valved station by-pass to permit controlled draining of either force n The wet well will be at least 40 feet wide and will permit suction from 5 pumps. each 8 feet apart. The rectangular flat bottom will be at least 10 feet long and the sloped triangular shaped floor will be about 15 feet long. 4.5 SITE General The lease for the present pumping station site is included in Appendix E. The new station will be located at a site recommended herein in Appendix A and approved by the Districts and GTE. s 4-13 The existing pumping station must be kept fully serviceable until the new station is complete and operating. The new pumping station should be located near the existing station. The only feasible sites _ surrounding it are owned by GTE and are used for employee parking. The pump station site will be attractively landscaped and enclosed with a block wall. r Two site layouts are shown in Appendix A. Area Requirements Daily site access is by maintenance personnel in a small truck and often by repair personnel In a larger vehicle. Access must allow personnel to safely drive to. from and through a security gate, unlocking and locking it in the process without impeding traffic on Slater Avenue. Puking and at least minimum vehicle tum-around area should be provided inside the fence. These functions require an area of about 75 feet by 40 feet. some of which can be landscaped. This area may be located over the wet well and assoclated valving appurtenances. The building previously described, together with the generator enclosure and the vehicle area will require a net area of about 5200 square feet and a gross area of about 6000 square feet. compared to the existing 4100 square feet. r All of the existing site can be renovated and returned to GTE usage for employee puking. Drainage The low point on the south side of Slater Avenue now drains slowly overland, around the east and south side of the pumping station. Regardless of whether dffierential settling has resulted in standing water there or whether the presence of water has weakened the soil causing the settling, the low spot should have a catch basin and the flows piped to the nearly 54-inch ` diameter storm drain. Easements Land related uansactions between CSDOC and GTE should include the following Items: 1. Purchase of new land on which the pumping station and appurtenances will stand. _ 2. Temporary construction easements to land that will be disturbed during the construction. r 4-14 3. Permanent sewer easements for pipes to and/or from the pumping station. 4. Conditions for returning presently leased land to GTE. 4.6 AUXILIARY SYSTEMS Instrumentation The Slater Avenue pumping station, following the standardized criteria of the CSDOC, will transmit the following alarm signals over leased telephone lines to the control center at the CSDOC offices: r a. Person in station. b. On battery power(indicates loss of single-phase power or loss of power to controls)• C. fuss of ac power(no power to pumps). .. d. Loos of control air. e. Dry wet well Low water level In either wet well. r L High water level in either wet well. g. Generator power on. h. Water In the dry well. r Status signals will also be transmitted to the control center indicating the following for each pump: r a. Pumps on/off. r b. Check valves open/closed. r A bubbler system will be installed in the carrier pipe in each wet well with standard bubbler tubes Inserted from above so that the bottom of each tube is six inches above the floor. Each bubbler system will have two 1/6 HP air compressors as standard with the Districts' current r policy. Odor Control Since the dry well will be isolated from the wet well and will be routinely ventilated, offensive gasses should not be a problem in the dry well. r 4-15 r The rising and falling levels of the raw sewage in the wet well require that fresh air enter the well and that offensive gasses may be forced out to the atmosphere. To scrub this exhaust, r small disposable activated carbon canisters are recommended. Potable Water The present station is served by a 3/4-inch potable water pipe which is not currently in service. The new station can use the same 3/4-inch potable water pipe,but the new system will Include r an outside reduced pressure backllow preventer (required by code), an inside, float controlled air-break tank and a small hydropneumatic system to repressurize the water for station wash down. s The new station will include a toilet and sink with an electric water heater. r 4-16 CHAPTER 5 chapter 5 PROJECT COSTS AND SCHEDULES 5.1 GENERAL The cost of sewer construction recommended In this report is based on the pipeline construction costs curve from Volume 4 of the Master Plan for a July, 1987 cost level. The curves plotted therein have been adjusted upward by a factor of 1.575 to account for Increases due to inflation, appurtenances, and difficulty of construction. Escalation has been made to the mid point of construction. The cost level is projected to be ENR1A 6400. Table 5-1 shows ® the unit prices from which the estimates have been made. Applicable project costs including engineering, legal, and fiscal, and contingencies have been added to the estimated construction costs. For this report, an allowance of 35 percent has been added. This allowance is consistent with the Master Plan. 5.2 PROJECT COSTS Table 5-2 shows the project costs for recommended sewer construction leading to the pumping station. Table 5-3 shows the estimated ject cost for the recommended sewer system from the pumping station. Table 5-4 shows the estimated project cost for the new Slater Avenue Pumping Station. The cost shown does not include the land or possible special foundation conditions due to soil *� factors at the site. Table 5-5 shows the total estimated project cost for all the construction recommended in this report. 5-1 TABLE 5-1 ESTIMATED UNIT PRICES FOR SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION Sewer Pipe Unit Diameter Price Inches S/If r 24 329 27 375 r 30 421 33 468 36 514 r 42 607 48 700 r 54 791 72 1072 (1) ENR-IA=6400 r 12) Legal.Administrative and Engineering Costs are not included r r r r 5-2 r TABLE 5.2 ESTIMATED PROJECTS COSTS FOR RECOMMENDED SEWERS TRIBUTARY TO PUMPING STATI0N") Location Cost Heil Ave. 1400 if 27"diameter $ 525,000 4000 if 36" diameter 2,056.000 Golden West St. 5250 If 42" diameter 3,186,800 Slater Ave. to P.S. 900 if 42" diameter 546,000 2001f 72" diameter 214,400 Total Estimated Construction Cost 6.528,200 Add 35%for Administration, Legal, and Engineering Costs 2,285,000 Total Estimated Project Cost $8,813,200 Say $8.813.000 (11 ENR-LA= 6400 5-3 TABLE 5-3 ESTIMATED PROJECTS COSTS FOR RECOMMENDED SEWERS FROM PUMPING STATIONII) Location Cost ® Slater Avenue Force Main 1000 If 36" diameter $ 244,800 1300 if 36"diameter to Nichols St. 509.400 1200 if 33"diameter 561.600 2650 If 36" diameter 1.362.100 Diversion Structure 91.000 Total Estimated Construction Cost $2,768.900 .. Add 35% for Administrative, Legal, and Engineering Costs 969.000 -d Total Estimated Project Cost $3,738,000 I1) ENR-LA= 6400 5-4 m TABLE 5 4 SLATER AVENUE PUMPING STATION ti ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS") Estimated Work Cost r Bonds. Insurance, Mobilization. etc. $230,000 Site Work 110,000 Demolition 125.000 Dewatering 300.000 Earthwork 350.000 Concrete 890,000 Metals &Plastics 50.000 Superstructure 120.000 Surface Treatments 120.000 .. Pumps, Pipe &Valves 780.000 Plumbing 2,500 Electric &Instrumentation 780,000 Generator Set 115.000 Ventilation 30.000 Miscellaneous 20,000 Construction Cost $4.022.500 Add 35% for Administrative. Legal. and Engineering Costs 1-407,900 Project Cost $5.430.400 Say $5,430.000 (1) ENR-IA= 6400 a 5-5 d TABLE 5-5 TOTAL RECO NDED PROJECT COSTS(') Project Costs Sewers Tributory to Pumping Station $8.813,000 Pumping Station 5,430,000 Sewers from Pumping Station 3,738,000 Total Recommended Project Cost $17.981.000 r I1) ENR-LA= 6400 5-6 5.3 SCHEDULES r Long range dates for implementation of recommendations detailed In this report are shown graphically in Figure 5-1. The priorities for construction based on recent flow measurement are as follows: 1. Slater Avenue Pump Station 2. Slater Avenue sewerage between Golden West Street and Nichols Street, including the diversion structure there. v 3. Golden West Street between Heil Avenue and Slater Avenue. r By diverting 5.4 MGD (average flow) from the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension at Nichols Street, the trunk will be relieved of that flow effectively, giving it more capacity for higher flows in the future. While the Master Plan Indicates a future deficiency In the Slater-Springdale system, neither r that need. nor the need to construct the Hell Avenue Interceptor 1s apparent at this time. Both the Slater-Springdale system and the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension should be r metered at least yearly to determine flow trends and to predict the time when construction will be necessary. r r r r 5-7 r 1990 IN 1991 1991 1V 19V Jan Feb Nar r Na Jun IM Ago ISep 10ct Illov Ioec Jan Ifeb Illar 1hr Na Jun IJul Au Se Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb lKar 1kr [Kay Jun IM lAug ISeD Notice to Proceed 0 DESIGN .Surveyingf� .Soils AX Station Design .Sewer Design .501 CM Review .901 CSOOC Reviev Traffic Plans City Review .Final Chan es CONSTRICTION .Advertise Pro'ecls .Award Contracts p .Coast. Pup Station .Coast. Sewers Slater Avenue Pump Station and Sewers JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Preliminary Project Schedule FIGURE 5-1 r r sd r r r r w CHAPTER 6 r r chapter COST ALLOCATION 6.1 GENERAL The previous chapters have described improvements that alleviate deficiencies for District 11 alone or Jointly serve both Districts 3 and 11. In addition to the remedial work, the ,o improvements provide for diverting 5.4 MGD of average flow from the Knott Trunk to the Miller-Holder Trunk system. This flow is made up of contributions from both Districts. This chapter outlines buy-in costs for future use of existing systems. It also discusses the w allocation of these new costs between Districts 3 and 11. Buy-in costs are based on projected average flow rates. Where peak flows are reported In this chapter, they are given for the purposes of relating to hydraulic capacity. 6.2 NEW IMPROVEMENTS s The improvements recommended in this study include: .. 1) Hell Avenue Interceptor 2) Golden West Trunk r 3) Slater Avenue Pump Station- Influent Relief Sewer 41 Slater Avenue Force Main _ and Diversion Structure 5) Slater Avenue Relief Sewers 6) Slater Avenue Pump Station. Heil Avenue Sewer/Golden West Trunk m These sewers would relieve deficiencies in the Slater-Springdale Trunk and the existing Golden West Trunk Sewer. These sewers serve District 11 only and all costs would be allocated to District 11. Slater Avenue Influent Sewer From the intersection of Golden West Street and Slater Avenue, an existing 33-inch sewer flows into the Slater Avenue Pump Station. This reach Is too small for future flows, and this report r recommends construction of a 42-inch parallel sewer. These two pipes would carry both District 3 and District I I flows to the new Slater Avenue Pump Station site. The existing 6-1 33-inch pipe Is owned 100 percent by District 11. However, there are existing District 3 flows that enter the Slater System at the intersection of Slater Avenue and Golden West Street. r In review of Figure 3-2, the 33-inch pipe has a peak hydraulic capacity of 19.09 MGD, while the total peak flow is projected to be 28.31 MGD. The existing pipe has insufficient capacity for District 11 flows even without the District 3 contribution. In terms of average flow, District 3 is projected to contribute 2.33 MGD. This flow is discussed in Section 3.4. The average District 11 flow is projected at 17.94 MGD, considering planned land use downgrades and resulting flow reductions from Bolas Chlca. Therefore, District 3 contributes 11.5 percent of the total contributory flow to the pump station. This relates to a peak flow of 3.26 MGD. The relief sewer provides for an additional peak capacity of 9.22 MGD. Therefore, the District 3 share would be 35A percent (3.26 -, 9.22 x 100). r The existing 33-inch Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and new 42-inch sewer would Join a new 72-inch sewer and convey the wastewater east and south to the new wet well. This protect cost is allocated in the same manner as the pump station costs discussed below. r Pump Station/Force Main The new pump station and force main would serve both District 3 and District 11 in proportion to their average flow contribution. The District 3 share would be 11.5 percent while the District 11 share would be 88.5 percent. Slater Avenue Relief Sewers �+ The Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extenslon from west of Koledo Lane to Newland Street would require a parallel relief sewer. This portion of the trunk is owned only by District 11 and carries only District 11 flows. s Summary of New Costs w The new improvements along with the allocation of costs is given in Table 6-1. Of the total project costs, the District 3 share would be $1.050,000, while the District 11 share would be $16,931.000. These are at ENRLA 6400. 6-2 TAR1E 6.1 PROJECT COST SPLR NEW 1NIPROVEMENTS District District District District No.I� No. 11 No. 3 No. 11 District District Flow12) Flow Share Share No. 3 No. 11 Item Protect Cost(1) (MGD) (MGD) (%) (%) Cost Cost Heil Avenue Interceptor $3.484.000 0 NA O 100 0 $3,484,000 Golden West Trunk Sewer $ 4.302.000 0 NA 0 100 0 $4,302,000 m Slater Avenue Pump w Station Influent Relief Sewer $ 737.000 2.33 4.26 35.4 64.6 $ 261.000 $ 476,000 Slater Avenue Force Main/Gravity Sewer/ Diversion Structure $ 1.141.000 2.33 17.94 11.5 88.5 $ 131.200 $ 1.009,800 Slater Avenue Relief Sewers $2.597.000 0 NA 0 100 0 $2.597.000 Slater Avenue Pump Station/72" Influent $5,720,000 2.33 17.94 11.5 88.5 $ 657.800 $5,062.200 $17.981.000 $1,050,000 $16.931.000 (1) Costs 3rd Quarter 1989 (2) All flows average 6.3 EXISTING FACILITIES Cost Basis Currently, District 3 is utilizing the slater Avenue Pumping Station and force main. These are owned by District 11. The diversion at Nichols Street will also result in District 3 flows in a District 11 sewer. This Section discusses the buy-in cost for District Three's use of these facilities. As part of this discussion, two other District 3/District 11 ownership exchanges are included. m One Is the buy-in cost for District Three's use of District Elevens Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer, Newland Street Interceptor, and Coast Trunk Sewer from newland to Plant No. 2. This exchange was presented in a report prepared by Wllldan titled "Study and Recommendations ,r for Exchange of Service Areas Between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11." The second Is for District Eleven's use of the Miller-Holder Trunk for local collection in the southeast comer of the District. This is discussed in the 1989 Master Plan. A cost allocation for the diversion of District 11 flows into the Miller-Holder Trunk System Is not required. District 11 owns sufficient capacity In the Knott Interceptor for its projected flows without the diversion. District 3 owns the remainder.The diversion to the Miller-Holder Trunk does not result in any downstream deficiencies. The Miller-Holder hunk Is owned by District 3. The diversion from the Knott Interceptor benefits District 3. Therefore, the diversion should be viewed as an exchange. The cost basis for the exchange is based on the present, updated value of each item involved. The actual cost of the Slater Avenue Force Main and the Nichols Street Sewer Items along with date of completion and ENRIA at that time are reported in Table 6-2. The cost has then been w updated to the third quarter. 1989 ENRIA of 5766. This is the present cost level. The cost basis of the remaining items are given below. Buy-in Costs The existing Slater Avenue Force Main Is owned entirely by District 11. As shown in Table 6-1 previously, District 3 will need to own 11.5 percent of the capacity. The Nichols Street Sewer is owned 100 percent by District 11. Most of the flow is a result of the diversion. The average flow at the reach between Manholes 292 to 131 is projected at 5.53 MGD. District 3 will have an average contribution of 2.33 MGD or 42.1 percent. No improvement is recommended for the Ntchols Street Sewer. As presented in Table 6 of the Wllldan 9Pnort. District 3 would need to pay District No. 11 for interest as follows: 6-4 r TABLE 6-2 COST BASIS FOR EBISTING FAC=IES PmJect ENRI.A Updated Original Completion at Cost at Item Cost Date Completion ENRLAr5766 24-inch Slater Ave.(I) Force Main $ 130,000 6-9-82 4533 $ 165,400 Nichols Street Gravity Sewer- MH 296-131(2) $ 116,600 9-23-66 1110 $ 602,600 (1) Only includes the 24-inch force main that will remain In service. (2) MH 131 is on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at Nichols Street. r r 6-5 r 1) Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer $1,006,110 r. 21 Newland Street Interceptor $ 282,008 3) Coast Trunk Sewer from Newland to Plant No. 2 $ 215.682 41 Credit for esfcrinea Distrlct 3 ownership in ($ 969,277) Newland-Delaware r Subtotal $ 534.523 These costs are at ENRIA 5474. At the December, 1989 level of 5766. the net buy-m is $563,036. As reported In the 1989 Master Plan, District 11 must purchase are additional 1.95 MGD in r the Miller-Holder Trunk from Magnolia Street to Plant No. 2. District 11 is currently using this capacity for local collection. The sewer In this reach is 78 inches in diameter with a capacity of 53.49 MGD. District I Vs share would be 3.60 percent. Based on construction cost ,. information in the 1989 Master Plan, the estimated value of the reach is $6,450,000. The buy-in cost would be$232,200. Calculation of the respective buy-in is given in Table 6.3. This shows the existing ownerships, needed ownerships, and buy-in costs. The result is that District 3 would pay District 11 for the net cost of ownership transfer total of$630.836. r r r r r 6-6 r c t I i i I TABLE 6-3 PROJECT BUY-IN COSTS Exlstina Ownership 1%) Needed Ownership M) Buy-in Cost Updated District District District District District District Item Cost 3 11 3 11 3 11 ENRIA= 5766 24-111eh Slater Avenue Force Main(') $ 165.400 0 100 11.5 88.5 8 19.000 O Nichols Street Gravity Sewer MH 296-131(2) $ 602,600 O 100 42.1 57.9 $254.000 0 Newland/Delaware/01 m Coast Trunk Exchange N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $563.036 0 v Miller-liolder Trunk Sewer $6.450,000 100 0 96.4 3.60 0 $232.200 Totals $863.036 $232,200 Net Buy-in Cost to District 3 $630.836 -- (1) Only includes the 24-inch force main that will remain In service. (2) Will 131 is on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at Nichols Street. (3) From Wllldan Report J rl YN ti v APPENDIX A J GTE SITE LAYOUTS SEWER PLANS & PROFILES J .I J J J J wi .M.T.. Pw A.TO NIONOLB STREET NSEI :.M.TO GOTHARD ST.IRESERVEI NEW P.E.WFI RIpM OpOEN WEE!BiNEET EXMI \�Be UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE IS NOT SHOWN. CONTOUR LINES ARE FROM OLD G.T.E.PLAN. EXISTING PUMPING STATION WILL BE DEMOLISHED AND THE SITE WILL BE RETURNED TO GTE READY FOR PARKING. - ATRR AVENUE PUMP STATION EA SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT CONTNACT NO.IT-N .1WIXXN _ - PROTECT REPORT X kL=-- ----- -�iwlT G T E SITE N cnn PUMP STATION LAYOUT 1 • xo 1 EOP R &IY:f W 4 W NCNOL! STREET IIISEI 'µ V OOTNARO ST.IRESERVEI _rrtM I.9.ON1 •• IAM OOLgN WE91 MS.T r_,BIIBI �a UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE IS NOT SHOWN. CONTOUR LINES ARE FROM OLD G.T.E.PLAN. EXISTING PUMPING STATION WILL BE DEMOLISHED AND THE SITE WILL BE RETURNED TO GTE READY FOR PARKING. _ .ATER AVENUE IONO STATION +NI YO -- .__.9f9ifY lYIflWFYINi fg9iR�CI NO.IPV 3"94 RIIpIi W41xWN . G 7 E Sf7E W9WNrgN MP STATION LAYOUT 2 2 r 2 e. 2 INFLUENT WET WELL P P P PUh SIOEWAUK 1 � y r N- (1 - 1 � MOTC 0 SLATES AVENUE PUMP STATION OE SYBEEY INMOrEYENt CpIMµT am,,-N "wm0 x ..EC, PEIWT ur. wn n ErEN1EtNN LAYOUT I m xo r r SCALE 1/8* -T-8' AP ROROE MAIN INPLUENT p WET �- WELL r r r >' r � SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION mn xa E SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT COMNIACT NOdI-O �mxox PROTECT REPMT IRS LAYOUT 2 s.EEr xo. TB REY. EA BY WSpMP}IPN SOUTH SLATER AVE NORTH R B"G_ __ I PAC. ___ ___ GTE E 10 12'W I I T I Y T I * I I rn - - - 0 D y IS 33'SEWER Z NEW 42" SEWER r -10 m -20 SLATER AVENUE SECTION "A" @ STA. 108+00 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 'COUNTY ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY I l [ [ [ [ [ l I t l ! 1 [ I ELEVATION IN FEET 20 SOUTH SLATER AVE NORT - - R --- 10 PAC. I GT S•G E 12'W S•S i 0 54• SD 33' � I SEWER NEW 72" SEWER -10 -20 SLATER AVENUE SECTION "B" Q STA. 101+00 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS P� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS /Y'VIIy.TS OF ORANOE COUNTY e e e e e e e e t e e e e e e t e e e 20 SOUTN SLATER AVE NORTH w PAC. PM g•g 24' LL 10 S'G 12iW 1 1 R TPMAIN—GTE E ? i T z 0 a p NEW 36" w o FORCE MAIM J W _10 _- SLATER AVENUE SECTION "C" @ STA. 98+00 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY so SOUTH NORTH R PAC. SLATES AVE R L 1 40 8"W GTE w 8"S 30-S 1 30'S T E I 8'G z O f. - LU W 20 NEW 36" FORCE MAIN SLATER AVENUE SECTION "D" @ STA. 87+00 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1 1 1 1 I l 1 l t 1 I I t 1 l I 1 [ 1 ao sour+ SLATER AVE -NORTH R PAC. Blg I T I GTE H � I 30•g I 30'3 T w S'G E LL 30- Z + Q O Q I � wJ 20 w NEW 36' FORCE MAIN SLATER AVENUE SECTION "E" @ STA. 79+50 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ao - sourH SLATER AVE NORTH 30 LIJ R 4 w 42'S U- ' 8'S - T S'W T Z 3'G Z 20 O 10 \ - NEW 33' SEWER SECTION 'F' @ STA. 40+00 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1 1 1 l ( 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 l 1 t 1 1 1 1 40 SOUTH NORTH SLATER AVE 30 i rY w i 4'G T S'S I SS•S 48•� w � LL 2 z 20 I j � I J W 10 0 SECTION 'G' Q STA. 14+00 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS [J'/vILJ_Y{ OF ORANGE COUNTY r 7EAST 20 II, OIL /EST r I ELEC 8 1'6* R 1 � I I w r w '° LL Z r Z O f 0 > w J W r EAST 20 r STANDARDST OIL R S ELEC S6 F r S Ui w 10 LL tit = r I 2 O r > 0 w W r GOLDEN WEST ST. SECTION "H" @ STA.19+00 & SECTION "J" @ STA. 42+00 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION r n SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF GRANGE COUNTY r }yr Y1I Y� V if L APPENDIX B r MASTER PLAN PRINTOUTS r i µ �i II f d iu SOURCE - MASTER PLAN ' Boyle Engineering Corporation 9 9 Ne0, Nor 30, 1988, Il:IB PM Page a Sewer Analysis Sanitary Load Applications .. aN011 S)STEM s L;S! UPDATED 11/29190 IGO SLATER SPRINGDALE RELIEF SEWER A MM Slope Dia- Capaaitiesa Area Flo. Point Avg. Total Vet- De0th Encase Under Capacs Op Iowa meter Peal Avg. Input Source Floe Flo- Daily Ratio Avg Cap Repl. Nat'l Identification 616 634 .00104 27 5.67 3.60 .0 .00 .00 4.71 7.40 2.9 )1.0 30 21 SPRIN64ALE 6 EDINGER new 634 612 .00115 27 6.19 3.00 .0 .00 .00 4.11 7.40 2.7 )1.0 30 21 632 630 .4"M 71 1.97 1.06 .0 .00 .00 4.71 1.40 2.9 )LO IS 21 SPRINGDALE 6 NEIL 630 623 .00149 27 7.05 4.17 .0 .00 ,DO 4.71 7.40 3.4 .70 30 12 528 626 .00O15 27 2.24 1.29 .0 .00 .00 4.11 7.40 2.9 )LO /5 39 w 654 626 2.69 .00 9 626 624 .00014 16 4.63 2.83 .0 .00 .00 1.40 11.29 2.3 )1.0 31 12 SPRINGDALE 6 OCFCC 621 622 .00005 36 2.13 1.66 $2.6 .11 .00 1.53 11.39 2.5 )1.0 60 51 600 622 4.93 .00 O was 622 620 .00075 36 10.77 .1.09 167.1 .41 .00 12.06 18.63 4.1 )1.0 /5 33 620 610 .00060 36 )0.25 6.12 515.1 .97 .09 13.75 19.92 4.3 )1.0 10 36 SLATER 6 SPRiNGOALE 618 616 .00075 36 10.77 7.09 .0 .00 .00 13.75 19.82 4.3 )LO 18 36 46 611 .00140 36 14.71 9.95 .0 .00 .00 13.75 19.02 4.3 )1.0 12 27 SLATER 6 EDWARDS r all 612 .00110 36 13.04 8.11 2137.7 2.67 .00 16.65 23.62 5.2 )1.0 15 36 'um612 610 .0001/ 36 9.25 3.30 .0 .00 .00 16.65 23.62 5.2 A.0 51 40 SLATER 6 RATOR 610 609 .00102 36 12.57 0.36 DTA .14 .00 16.79 23.31 3.3 )1.0 48 36 s 6N Sol 1.66 .00 0 608 606 .00375 33 19.09 13.21 001.3 1.61 .00 20.21 20.31 7.4 )LO 39 27 SLATER 6 GOLDERNEST Spite Engineering Corporation ded. No• 30. 799R, 11:18 PM Page 2 u. Se.er Analysis Sanitary Load AADlicalions ,101! SKtEN ; LAST UPDATED Il/29a88 NO SLATER SPRINGDALE TRUNK SEWER r MN MN Slope pia- Capacities: Area Floe Point Avg. Total Vel- Depth Excess Under CaPac: 0p come aster Peal Avg. Input Source Floe Flaw ocity Ratio Avg Cap Rapt. Nat'l Identification 664 662 .00210 15 1.02 .55 183.7 .34 .00 .34 .66 7.3 .39 .21 SPRINGDALE 6 BOLSA 662 660 .00160 15 .84 .11 499.5 1.00 .00 1.34 2.33 2.9 )I.0 21 21 SPRINGDALE 1 NCFADDE sme 660 658 .00120 21 3.23 1.97 228.6 .46 .00 1.90 3.05 2.6 .77 Az SPRIN60ALE 6 EDINGER 659 656 .00020 21 1.99 1.07 260.8 .91 .00 2.62 1.30 2.1 )LD 33 27 SPRINGDALE I NEIL 1 656 654 .00160 21 5.33 3.30 .0 .00 .00 Z.62 6.30 3.1 .66 .69 _ 654 626 .00160 24 5.33 3.30 36.7 .07 .00 2.69 4.41 3.2 .65 .62 APPENDIX B SHEET I OF 3 man wat f - SOETR(eE - MASTER PLAN Boyle Engineering Corporation Ned. Nov 30, 1989, 13:19 PH Pepe 2 Sewer Analysis Sanitary Load Applications w !,107T 5'/SIEH lFif UPDATED II/77/811 MOO MR AN Slope Dia- Capacities, Area Flow Point Avg. lotpl Yet- Depth Excess Under Capau w Up Dom meter Peal Avg. Input Source Flow Flow ocity Ratio Avg Cap Rep]. Rei'1 Identification _ 616 674 .00220 12 .54 .27 44.1 .00 .00 .00 .17 1.5 .26 .20 SOLDENNESI 6 EDINGER 610 672 .00180 15 .BP .41 191.3 1.50 .00 1.61 2.76 3.5 )1.0 21 21 BOLOENNEST I HEIL .� 672 670 .00100 15 .19 .11 30.5 .23 .00 1.16 3.15 4.0 )1.0 21 21 SOLDENNEST B WARNER 670 600 .00120 27 6.32 3.91 .0 .00 .00 1.96 3.15 2.6 .47 2.11 man Style E+g!neertng Corporation Neo, Nov H. 1988, o:i8 FN Page a Sewer :na Leis Sanitary Load loolicat>ors va, o:Gr' iis:i' .-TI.P O it i7!53 e6D NH AN Slope Dia- Capacities: Area Flow Point Avg. Total gel- Depth Excess Under Capac: Up Down meter Peak Avg. Input Source Flow Flow ocity Ratio Avg Cap Repl. Rel't Tomtiiiution 670 608 1.06 .00 U saw 609 606 .00375 33 19.09 13.21 091.3 1.61 .00 20.27 29.31 7.4 )1.0 39 27 SLATER 6 GOLDEMWEST 606 604 .00400 30 15.29 10.38 .0 .00 .00 20.27 29.31 8.7 )1.0 39 30 SLATER I P.S. 604 602 .00000 30 21.62 15.12 .0 .00 .00 20.27 28.31 0.9 )1.0 36 21 SLATER I AR 602 600 .01030 36 39.89 29.43 .0 .00 -5.38 14.19 21.31 9.5 .19 14.54 SLATER I NICHOLS an 600 $99 .00014 42 16.13 11.00 .0 .00 .00 1/.89 21.31 3.4 >1.0 18 30 BTU. MORGAN 6 KOLEDO mum599 326 .00074 12 16.13 11.00 418.4 1.12 .00 16.60 23.36 3.0 )1.0 51 33 SLATER I BEACH wwr r APPENDIX B SHEET 2 OF 3 r r r r SOURCE - MASTER PLAN Boyle Engineering Corporation Ned, Nov SO, 1789. 9:04 AM Page I Sewer Analysis Sanitary Load Applications war' MLLE9-401-BE9 S(SJE0 1 LAST OFnAIEO 11129,69 MSD MR MN Slope Oil- Capacilieil Area Flow Point Avg. Total Vel- Depth Excess Under Capact Up Down meter Peal Avg. Input Source Flew Flow oche Ratio Avg Cap FORT. Bel'1 Identification 296 294 .00210 21 6.11 3.03 .0 .00 3.38 3.38 8.36 4.1 )1.0 27 21 NICHOLS 6 SLATER la' 294 292 .00610 21 10.41 6.03 32.0 .13 .00 3.53 0.57 6.2 .63 1.31 NICHOLS 292 131 .00570 21 10.01 6.59 .0 .00 .00 5.53 0.51 6.0 .66 1.06 NICHOLS w r Boyle Engineering Corporation Ned, Nov 30, 1980. 13:10 FM Fags 2 Sewer Analysis Sanitary Load Applications ti 1110TT SYSTEM : LAST UPDATED it/27/88 NCO MN AN Slope Dia- Capacities: Area Flaw Point Avg, Total Vel- Depth Excess Under Capau r, Up Down meter Peal Avg, Input Source Flow Flow acite Ratio Avg Cap Aepl. ReFf Identification 576 571 .00130 10 1.22 .67 711,3 1.67 .00 1.61 2.84 2.5 )1.0 21 21 SLATER 6 NEWLAND r Boyle Engineering Corporation Wed, No, 30. 1930. 9:04 AM Page 1 r Sewer Analysis Sanitary Load Applications MILLER-POLDER SYSTEn I LAST UPDATED 11/0/08 M6D r MN MH Slope Dia- Capacities: Area Flow Point Avg. Told gel- Depth Excess Under Capar. Up Down meter Peak Avg. Input Source Flow Flow stile Ratio Avg Cap Repl. Rel'f Identification 126 121 .00011 12 61.71 17.30 335.8 .67 .00 39.03 31.17 3.6 .71 8.21 MAGNOLIA 6 NAANEA APPENDIX B SHEET 3 OF 3 i 1 I i 1 I I 1 i i I I I APPENDIX D SLATER AVENUE PUNMINO STATION PROJECT INDEX TO PLANS IN JCR FB,ES Golden Slater Slater Huntington Springdale Heil West Ave. Ave. Nichols Beach Ave. Ave. St. W/O P.S. E/O P.B. St. Others City Street Improvement 100 300 400 500 600 700 Telephone 205 305 505 605 705 Gas 210 310 510 610 Electric 215 315 415 515 615 City Water A Sewer 520 City Water 528 625 825 City Sewer 230 330 430 530 730 830 County Sewer 135 335 435 538 635 735 Cable T.V. 240 340 440 540 Storm Drain 245 346 445 545 845 Richfield Oil 350 550 Texaco Oil 355 Northam Gas 360 Gulf Oil 365 Caltrans 570 r r r r HID HI,IM S,NSFPdSY3 QNY r SNHWEHHOV asvaI NOIIVIS ONIdWLId r H XIGNad TV r r r r ro r tq r of E.ecv:eme ON.,;es GTE California Incorporated r One GTE Piave TWusano Oaks.Cakfornia 91362-381, 805 372.6000—Oxwei 805 372 6282 r In Reply Refer To r January 26, 1988 3521 L.2 r ' County Sanitation Districts r Of Orange County, California Mr. Bob Chenowith Senior Engineering Aide for Tom Dawes 10844 Ellis Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 s, Dear Bob: RE: LEASE AGREEMENT, GTE CALIFORNIA PROPERTY, SLATER AVENUE, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA r Enclosed are two signed lease agreements for the above mentioned Properties. Please sign both and return one to us along with the easement Permit. Please feel free to contact me at (805) 372-6684 should you have further questions. r Sinc Y40Y Real Es a Development Senior Analyst r RAL:,ld/SS199 Enclosure (2) r w r 4 Pan of GTE Ccrporauon w s LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY It is agreed by and between General Telephone Company of California, dba GTE California Incorporated (hereinafter called "Lessor") and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County California (hereinafter called . "Lessee") that Lessor hereby leases to Lessee certain real property being . located on Slater Avenue in Huntington Beach, as indicated in Exhibit A attached hereto. The leasing of said property is subject to the following terns and conditions: 1. The term of this lease shall be five (5) years beginning February 1, .r 1988. 2. Lessee will pay to Lessor as rent the sum of One Thousand Nine w. Hundred dollars ($1,900.00) per year, payable in advance of the commencement of each year. 3. The lease premises shall be used by the Lessee for the placement of �'— an on-site generator to. serve the adjacent Slater Avenue Pump Station. -4. The lease agreement shall be subject to Lessee obtaining an encroachment permit from the City of Huntington Beach. The city has been granted an easement by the Lessor for the purpose of providing storm drainage. The encroachment permit shall be presented to Lessor before Lessee may begin any activities on Lessor's land. „w 5. Lessee shall maintain and repair the property during the term of its occupancy at the Lessee's own cost and expense, and upon termination of the lease, return the property to its condition at the beginning of the lease upon Lessor's request. 6. Should any improvements be made to the property, all of Lessee's plans and specifications for the improvements must receive Lessor's prior approval . Lessor's approval of plans and specifications shall not be deemed or construed as approval of engineering design or integrity. 7. Lessee agrees to comply, at Lessee's own cost and expense, with all requirements of municipal , state and federal authorities pertaining to said premises and the business conducted therein and not to engage in or allow any business or occupation that is forbidden by law to be carried on, in or about said premises. 8. Lessee agrees to pay all charges for gas, electricity, water or other utilities that may be used in or upon or charged against the lease property during the term of this lease or any extension thereof. 9. Lessee shall indemnify and hold Lessor and its employees harmless from any and all claims, damages and suits, by whomever brought, arising w out of or relating to Lessee's use of the subject premises, whether such claims and suits arise before or after termination or conclusion of this agreement, howsoever and by whosoever caused including, but not limited to, the active and passive negligence (1) ev SS169 r r of Lessor, its agents, servant or employees, or any third parties, solely or contributorily. Said duty to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend Lessor .and its employees against such liability, claims, damages and suits or other legal proceedings and to assume and pay for all expenses of, and incidental to, such defense. 10. Lessee shall maintain insurance policies in full force and effect for the term of this agreement, with carriers authorized to do r business in California, with a financial rating of at least an A+3A status as rated in the most recent edition of insurance reports and satisfactory to Lessor, as follows: r (a) Worker's Compensation Insurance covering Lessee's full liability under all applicable Worker's Compensation laws in California. r (b) Comprehensive Public Liability Insurance in the amount of a minimum of $1,000,000 for death and injury to one person. (c) Property Damage Insurance on the amount of a minimum of $500,000 �— for property damage resulting for any one occurrence. The Insurance under (b) and (c) shall insure Lessee and Lessor against all claims for bodily injury, death, destruction of property which may arise from operations under this lease, whether such operations shall be by Lessee or by any one directly or indirectly employed by Lessee, and shall expressly cover liability assumed by Lessee under this lease. Each policy shall provide that the amount of coverage provided therein -shall not be reduced or terminated without ten (10) days written notice first being given to r Lessor. Certificates of Insurance incorporating the above endorsements shall be presented to Lessor before Lessee may begin any activities on Lessor's land. " 11. The terms of this lease shall inure to and be binding upon the heirs, executors, successors and assigns of the parties hereto, provided, however, the Lessee may not assign this lease or sublet any part of .. the lease property without first obtaining the written consent of the Lessor. r 12. Lessee agrees that Lessor, or Lessor's agents, may at all reasonable times and during reasonable hours have free access to said leased Premises for the purpose of examining or inspecting the condition thereof or of exercising any right of this lease. r 13. In the event that any legal action is instituted by either of the parties hereto to enforce the terms, conditions and covenants of ,r this lease, the party prevailing in any such action shall be entitled to recover all court costs and reasonable attorney's fee to be set by the court. r . r SS169 (2) 14. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by sending same by mail to the parties at their addresses as set forth below, or at such other addresses as the parties may from time to time notify each other in writing. For Lessor: General Telephone Company of California One GTE Place Thousand Oaks, CA 91362-3811 s Attention: Real Estate Development, RC 3521 For Lessee: w. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California .. Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 r— GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY COUNTY OF SANITATION DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, dba OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED ,r By BY Vice President - r Network Operations a, Assistant Secretary r RM APPROV" _ AtE0111hr r (3) SS169 ,.r pw i _ »o-.ol":fit awas; � .,.� ..:.,{: ;'.. '��'•• 17 va i e. /1 4 I , 10i0 oO011 . Arald /.1N*ro�.d7HY'etC •IIoN� 17ro141a `r+0,yV1�M'VC !1J.t+�+oj •.. . �' t {.La ,'. M 11 21• �Q S Y '9a.i NO"L-j ;. _ I. yo. ►AMt'.1%%4-.'do`,6�Q µ.7letas( t�tuV/tN . aei; ,. • . J J u y APPENDIX F POMP DATA li J J RECORDING REQUESTED BY 4ECORGEDAT UEaT F w N f. II Y N `1 ORANGE CZATY.CALIF. �. WHEN RECORDED M 11, TO Now 10 .l 26 M IS I.WYLL LAALYLE GOUIRY SANITATION DISTRICTS COUNTY RECORDER m,x s Ts .. 10544 ELLIS A ENUE FREE —SPACE ADOYE=S LtNa MR RECORDER'S Use r GRANT OF EASEMENT THIS INDENTUR&ntl.m.•I.r bm LLb '?th d w September .1968 4Y r btw.P G�ilEhAl. 'I'ti L�Ppf'L.i NrAf AITC (F ULIVRIIIA, a cornoration bn.mr. W ruupry 9uiutim DWu N.11,a G,••A.Cn 0.C.lilmui.••PNIpmrPnlim.Grob. WITNESSETH: F.,•wdm m.Wntlm IE. Gromr da br.bY Arot Wm Ib Grrs n.b W wY b ruhbd mnmp ud mJnWn Im.11 lbr.w611e rwr P rwn.oG.ppur4um la urwyp® uG alpn(WYmruip n.l pnprnY YunW u Ib Couvty W Oray.,81.4 ul CYllpmia mon p.em,Yv1Y ernibetl u foYo.r: r 6n easement, for sewer north over the south f Year, of the north LO feet 2{) the north one-third ar era of tthhe north one-half (J arte of the west threeichartters ('.1 h9in of the srnthweet Ant, in the ant of aecticn 26 Tow in the 5 South i,;:n;te gt .lest, in the Rancho La Aolsa ateChitao In the pity of SLO .iontnfE -each, nonta of (range State of California as SLction ne is shown on a map office of he Book 51 pager of :;lscellaneous I;ape, in the office of the County T?ecozder of r EF.id rcunty of Crange. .;xcepting therefrom the west 1010 feet and the eaFt 920 feet. r ylf THIS GRANT 4 I!.!WI ued.n,mtlly.rd medlti Ibt Ib Gnm Er mPw oI rM....er.w tlr M.Iv m—rl&Ai Ol Nu Marl..nLL wparty Imviihrtl..rmtu nmm Fur. r ''8101 • 443 .w.ma.pmrtrr.w.mrwmhPwm.u..l.nP,pr.dl.m.t m.m LL IM CERTIFICATE mFn a IGrml.h.11 b.rwmN M I4.Gruur r nu,beCERTIFICATE OF ACCDTANCE irotr.Funb.r.it u um.nme wu mn..enm.m mrA p..Nk rover o1 f4.:,x rxxF+n v.i..rnn. b r wvwn a ®pll.r wth .wh mla W I.r ,eneral;elePmm�e....ComOagY... a.b...o b m.d.ml, Ir..nim n . � cd..'IidY.d�.., it LL.mn Grolri rihu.bll uvlud.LL.ntht m mmlmn.M�- ..xww v4.r,v^ f WmPfN wtl4 p'Inww ratios m.r.rlW.YduM trW rvP.d rnim .x. •. •lur al IrWk rv.r WP vhd mm�um m.Y.auud tAiw LLe mrl.m GENERAIC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF Y CALIFORNIA a co oration _..•Anvuoas., a °r 11 ce tee nc r 1 11 •f V As, etanc Sec •• oc�o6tlr 21 1966 CARL VON HAKEr , tr.......a._ Vice H. RATYM RHYTIER la_ ,..... a..a s nn..�.s..� .�..�a�w Rorer ulc.cuwtw• •�" IIIN[04 MI4 w r uslW.d a.�v,r.0 m.vA.mr b.wn 101•MItl COWM1 a°gym" Col�via T'-I" � ! 196r f.0 WIIIYY.p ./ � 1 1 l 1 I 1 I I 1 i I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I t PUMP STATION SLATER AVENUE. - Dist. 11 Pump 0 1 Pump 0 2 Pump 0 3 Pump 0 4 Make of Pump Fairbanks-Morse Fairbanks-Morse Farrbanks-Morse Fairbanks-Morse Serial No. K2111040504 K98479 Not Available K2PI055931 Model 6 Size 5414/8" 5415/8" 5415/8" 54I5/8" Impeller No./Dia. 14-3/4" 18" 181. .19" RPM 825 1150 880 882 Motor HP, Voltage 40/440 75/220-440 75/440 75/N/A Drive (Const, Var) Constant Constant Constant Constant Design Point 1400 / 45 N/A / 3000 / 45 3000 / 45 )Flav(gpm)/TDH (feet)) EXISTING PUMPS APPENDIX F SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Source: Reliability Analysis COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I I ... IO x 80 _. r 0 Z 1600 u 60 I5.00 ___606R1 I :. .off• M MODEL a 1NG i 13.00 w 79 5414 ao r.. n_i_ PUMP NO.1 __ ._.__ 670 flPM ... :... 1 . ._I. ....._...__ _._. .... 20 _. . __ 70 20 10 I ^0 r 0 500 1000 IS00 2000 2500 3WO U.S.GPM r EXISTING PUMP NO.1 r i 1 NPRNR 1 S0 ri — 25 i _ 200+ 0 2 ISO EXISTING IMPELLER = n.ou 6s 7u PUMP NC . _._. ._ MODEL c _ F . o ..__. R so 3111001 9 150 � 5415 78 1R0 RP M Q 70 _ 501 0 150 _ PIP 8.00 . _..... __.__.--_._...16.00 . 100 h 2 .. .. .. .. 50 m 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 U.S. GPM _ EXISTING PUMPS NO.2 & NO.4 APPENDIX F SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _ r r �2p IF Nr9i1 I - s I r 10) I I 1 ! - i 1 Z ? ism - --�-_ _ EX u so= ` ISTING IMPELLER' _ 17.00 65 ' o 75 - - MODEL Z . —: _ p 16A0 18 i� :'.i $415 r z 60� Bl I '11 __ BI ' 870 RPM O bl ' - 7BI 73 r 70 is SHP I J- t 50 6 -Z Z i -Y15 m I 0 Soo 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 6000 6500 5000'0 U.S. GPM ti EXISTING PUMP NO.3 APPENDIX F SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION 1CT5 OF ORANGE COUNTY a 1 ! [ ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 i f 1 i 1 FAIRBANKS-MORSE SERIES 5700 PERFORMANCE 1 140 20 t NPSHR 21 {{(� 120 ;w 1 N _ W I I ri top _..�_.. LL 01 2 e MODEL 5713 _ 79 705 RPM J 80 II M :. B 200 NP r-•26 .. .•i' ..�.... ..._t.._.. _ _ 100 2LOG � .� � . 1 R 0 1000 20M 2000 4WD 7000 0000 70M 8000 U.S.GPM APPENDIX F ALTERNATIVE 1: SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION NEW PUMPS 1 THROUGH 5 SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r I NPSNR 70 _.___......_ .... _. r 35 200 0 z r W 150�177 10.00 EXISTING IMPELLER z o 6s 7U PUMP NO.2 .. . ___'_—.. .____. . . .._ MODEL 0 )S 8 r Z 100 80 B1 81 5415/8 80 18- 7s-70 1100 RPM so i r p ' j 8XP 18.00 150 100 , 16.00 t r 50 m 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 r U.S. GPM r r r r ALTERNATIVE 2: REFURBISHED PUMPS r 1 THROUGH 5 APPENDIX F SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r 50 .___..._...__.._.. ... _._L - - - = - --- ._._...... .... _.._ :..__:.._...... _........_.._...._.._.._...:.:.::....i-L=G'i::. ...... ... .._.. ...._::::t- :=f= MODEL . Lam... .. - .mot..---._ _�__.._....... 5415/10 O3::::f BTO RPM _ _..___ - .. -. .....-... .-.� m r. so 0 1000 5000 3000 4000 9000 6100 0 US. GPM r r ALTERNATIVE 3: REFURBISH PUMPS 1 THROUGH 5 ALTERNATIVE 4: NEW PUMPS 1 THROUGH 5 APPENDIX F SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF SA ORANGE COUNTY w ( 1 f 1 1 1 f 1 l 1 { l [ { l 1 ( 1 FAIRBANKS-MORSE SERIES 5700 PERFORMANCE � 1 I iM }1� IIIPSHRII ( I, 70I 4 I �jI(11 I I I• T � 1 - 1 -� 1 I 10 Z O Z Ip Ij 1 �I80. . I II tt � 44 ; 1W MODEL 5713 79 1 i I: 705 RPM 1 . r ; Ilj I I � III li I I,. 40 200 1.. 4l 4 i I. loo 3 l O 1000 1000 3000 4000 6000 am 7000 am U.S.GPM APPENDIX F SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V J rl APPENDIX G CSDOC PUMP STATION RELIABILITY ANALYSIS v r rJ r y REFERENCES 1 CSDOC Master Plan- 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineers. 2 CSDOC Design and Construction Requirements for Sanitary Sewers- 1987 3 Wildan Report-Study and Recommendations for Exchange of Service Areas Between County Sanitation Districts Nos.3 and 11. FORB rn.AE 1. V = 1.486 R2/e S1/2 s n for D of.75 R= .302 d a 2. Q = K Ds/a Si/2 x .646 MGD n Cis for D of.75 K= .91 a 3. Power Cost = Q x h x .746 x $0.06 x 365 3960 x.7 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN Q' MAY 9, 1990 1) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING DIRECTORS. LAST MONTH, TWO OF OUR BOARD MEMBERS RETIRED FROM THEIR POSTS. OVER THE YEARS, THESE DIRECTORS HAVE NOT ONLY PERFORMED THEIR DUTIES AS CITY COUNCIL AND SANITARY DISTRICT MEMBERS WITH A HIGH DEGREE OF PROFESSIONALISM AND DEDICATION, BUT THEY HAVE ALSO BEEN EQUALLY INVOLVED IN THE WASTEWATER DUALITY PROGRAM OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS. I WOULD THEREFORE LIKE TO INTRODUCE FOR THE BOARDS' CONSIDERATION, ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS EXPRESSING OUR APPRECIATION TO THESE RETIRING DIRECTORS AND RECOGNIZING THEIR OUTSTANDING CONSTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE. RESOLUTION NO. DIRECTOR'S NAME CITY/AGENCY DISTRICTS) 90-39 URSULA KENNEDY TUSTIN 14 90-40 BOB PERRY GARDEN GROVE 2 SANITARY DISTRICT - ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE - -1- . v 2) RECOGNITION OF ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL FIRMS RECENTLY PRESENTED WITH AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE BY THE CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION. AT ITS ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN APRIL, THE CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION RECOGNIZED THREE ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIES FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS IN PROMOTING WASTEWATER QUALITY, FOR CONSISTENTLY MEETING THEIR DISCHARGE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, AND FOR SERVING AS A MODEL FOR OTHER INDUSTRIES IN CONTROLLING, MANAGING AND REDUCING HAZARDOUS WASTES. NOMINATED BY THE DISTRICTS' SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION, TWO OF THESE FIRMS, OMNI METAL FINISHING AND HIXSON METAL FINISHING, BOTH LOCATED IN DISTRICT 6, WERE AWARDED THE CWPCA CERTIFICATE OF MERIT FOR MAINTAINING AN EXCELLENT RECORD OF PERMIT COMPLIANCE, INDUSTRIAL WASTE SOURCE CONTROL AND WASTE MINIMIZATION. THIS YEAR'S SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LARGE PLANT-OF-THE-YEAR AWARD WAS PRESENTED TO ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS, LOCATED IN DISTRICT 2. FOLLOWING THE INSTALLATION OF AN ON-SITE TREATMENT PLANT AND ANAEROBIC DIGESTER, ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS WAS ABLE TO REDUCE THE BOD IN THEIR EFFLUENT BY OVER 80%. IN ADDITION, THEY ARE NOW ABLE TO UTILIZE 300,000 CUBIC FEET PER DAY OF METHANE GAS, PRODUCED IN THEIR ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS, AS A SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCE OF FUEL FOR THEIR PROCESS DRYERS. THEY ALSO HAVE CONSISTENTLY BEEN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THEIR WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT. - ITEM 2 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE - -2- I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MR. VICTOR SALAZAR TO STEP FORWARD AND BE RECOGNIZED FOR OMNI METAL FINISHING'S CERTIFICATE OF MERIT. SIMILARLY, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MR. JIMMY KNIGHT TO STEP FORWARD AND BE RECOGNIZED FOR HIXSON METAL FINISHING'S CERTIFICATE OF MERIT. DAVID WADE, PLANT MANAGER I'D LIKE TO ASK MR. BENliff ARelERw ""--__EN+ OF ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS, TO STEP FORWARD AND BE RECOGNIZED AS THE 1989 WINNER OF THE CWPCA'S LARGE PLANT-OF-THE-YEAR AWARD. I KNOW I SPEAK FOR THE ENTIRE BOARD WHEN I SAY THAT YOUR EFFORTS ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED AND YOU ARE TO BE CONGRATULATED AND COMMENDED FOR YOUR EFFORTS. (NOTE: ASK RECIPIENTS IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS. ) 3) GENERAL MANAGER ELECTED VICE PRESIDENT OF AMSA BOARD I AM PLEASED TO REPORT TO YOU THAT THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES RECENTLY HELD THEIR ANNUAL MEETING IN HOUSTON AND OUR GENERAL MANAGER WAS ELECTED VICE PRESIDENT OF THE ASSOCIATION. _ AMSA IS VERY CTIVE IN LEGISLATIVE. REGULATORY AND TECHNICAL ISSUES AT THE NATIO L LEVEL WITH OFFICES IN WASHINGTON, D.C. FOR THE INFORMAT N OF THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE RELATIVELY NEW MEMBERS OF THE SANITATI DISTRICTS' BOARDS. WAYNE IS ALSO A PAST PRESIDENT OF THE CALIFORN ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES. CASH IS SIMILAR TO AMS BUT AT THE STATE LEVEL. WAYNE ALSO SERVES CURREN LY ON TRI-TAC AND, IN FACT, IS R PAST CHAIRMAN. TRI-TAC IS A TECHNICAL ADVI RY COMMITTEE TO THE STATE REGULATORY AGENCIES. IT IS COMPRI D OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM CASA AS WELL AS THE CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION AND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFOR A CITIES. - ITEM 4 ON NEXT P GE - -3- 4) COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS BECAUSE OF RECENT TURNOVER IN BOARD MEMBERSHIP THERE HAVE u BEEN VACANCIES CREATED ON SOME OF THE BOARD COMMITTEES. I WOULD, THEREFORE, LIKE TO ANNOUNCE THE FOLLOWING APPOINTMENTS: - HANK WEDAA TO CHAIR THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - WAYNE WEDIN TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: AND - ROBERT MAIN AND PHIL SANSONE TO THE SPECIAL REORGANIZATION COMMITTEE 5) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 16TH, AT 5:30 P.M. B. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES ARE SCHEDULED TO MEET JOINTLY ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 23RD, AT 5:30 P.M. C. JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE JOINT 'WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 23RD, AT 7:30 P.M. , IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, MAY 31ST, AT 5:30 P.M. - END OF REPORT - -4- MEETING DATE May 91 1990 TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,$,6.7,11,19 & 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS 1k9 #iy!f- sL N$ (YOUNG)....... GRISET .. y (AGE)....................ARNOLD...... 00. O— 0... (EDGAR)......W PUCKETT .... (GREEN)..................BANNISTER... ✓ ✓ (ROTH).........5 � (WEDAR)..................B I CONGER.... �G ✓ (CRANK)....... AHNER. CApY�G_ (HORSY)..................CATLIN...... �� ✓ X� (PLUMMER)................COX.........Je= _TG ✓ DISTRICT 2 (MAIN)...................CULVER......� �� ✓ (PUCKETT)................EDGAR.......JL _� ✓ (MEDAA)........BIGONGER....JZ_ _ (MAHONEY)................GRAHAM......�G _� ✓ (SCOTT)......�NEALe......... _ (CHESSER)................GRIFFIN..... .. �G _� ✓ (NORBY)...... CATL N......_�_ (YOUNG)..................GRISET......�G �� ✓ (YOUNG)........GRISET...... (PLUMMER)................HART........�L y ✓ (GRAHAM).......WAM HEY..... _ _ (GRAHAM).................MAHONEY.....�L ✓ (CULVER).......MAIN........JG_ _ (CULVER).................MAIN........�G _� ✓ (WEDIN)........NELSON........ _ (SILVA)..................fMYB........ —� ✓ (ECKENROOE). . (SCOTT)........ ( U .. S A (WEDIN).................. .NELSON ...... L(SALOARINI). .. (ECKENROOE)......... .NEWTON...... (BARBERA)... ...SMITH...... (HUNTER)............ .... PICKLER.....a�LG �J�CC� ✓✓✓ _� ✓ (ROTH).........STANTON...... (HART)...................PLUMMER..... JG ✓ (MINER)..................POLIS....... y/ ✓ DISTRICT 3 (EDGAR)..................PONTESUS ..._ (EDGAR)..................PUCKETT.....JG 7 ✓ (WIDEN)...... POLIS ..... (STANTON)................AR;. ........ — — (MEDIN)........ N...... (COX)....................SA NTONE..... ✓ (AGE)..........ARNOLD...... (AGRAN)..................SHERIDAN.... �� ✓ (GREEN)........BANNISTER... (WILES)..................5[EFEN...... ✓ (NORBY)........CA TLlN......;L (SALDARINI)..............3[LiEI...... [y (PERRY)........CULVER....... _ _ (BARRERA)................SMITH.......JG ✓ (MAHONEY)......GRAHAM......JG _ — (ROTH)...................STANTON..... . JC ✓ (CHESSEN)......GRIFFIN..... (MILLER).................BMAIh........ JG ✓ (YOUNG)........GR ISET...... (WAHLSTROM)..............SYLVIA......� �G ✓ (SCOTT)........NEAL........ (ALLEN)..................VERELLEN....� _h ✓ (HUNTER).......qq ICKLER.....JC (CRANK/FERRYMAN/GREEN)...MANNER...... JC ✓ (WILES).......�SIEFEN)....... _ (BIGONGER)...............NEDRA.......�G _� ✓ (ROTH).........333 TANTON........ _ (NELSON).................WEDIN.......�_ �� ✓ (MAHLSTROM)....SYLVIA...... _ (GRGAS)..................WILSON......JG (ALLEN)........VERELLEN.... (GREEN)..................NINCHELL.._.a — Je! ✓ (GRGAS)........WILSON....... DISTRICT 5 (PLUMIER)... . HART ..`... ✓ (COX)......... SONES....sC _ — STAFF: (STANTON)......ROPPM........JL_ SYLVESTER... ✓ BROWN....... DISTRICT 6 ANDERSON....1�2 CLAWSON.....y (FERRYMAN).... W ✓ DAWES.......JG (HART)........ LUMME .... HODGES...... (STANTON)...... KYLE........JG LINDER......�G DISTRICT 7 NICHOLS..... OOTEN.......JC (BARRERA)..... SMIT ..... ✓ STREED......�G (PLUMMER).... ...... ✓ —_ VINCENT.....�G (PLUMMER)......COX......... VON LANGEN i (YOUNG)........GRISET......JG _ _ WINSOR......�G (STANTON)......Re......... 1G �AAQ.Ow� (ABRAM)........SHERIDAN....JC (GREEN)........MAHNER......_SC_ _ WOODRUFF.... ✓ DISTRICT 11 IDE....... .. ANWAR....... (SILVA)...... _Jl _ _ DEMIR.......y (GREEN)....... INCHEL .. ✓_ _ FLEMING..... (ROTH)........ I P..... ✓_ _ HOHENER....._� HOUGH....... DISTRICT 13 HOWARD......�� •� HUNT........ (BIGONGER)....ciilizf..... . KNOPF....... (HUNTER).......PICKLER..... . LINDSTROM..._ (STANTON)......N6iN......... LYNCH....... (SARRERA)......SMITH.......JC _ _ STONE....... (NELSON)......(`NEDTN',.....= WASON....... YOUNG....... DISTRICT 14 �(� calk YWiAY (MILLER)...... ✓ (EDGAR)........ .......� V (STANTON)..... RBTH.... (AGRAN)......jSHERIDAI{>. 05/09/(BARRERAT...... WITH....... PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY MAY 9, 1990 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM Please Print Please Print 'Avi7lsJA, �qH(r¢ D S<9/ "r•.�r o.r(r r i*tc�l �',..rr�, .�. Tw S hC^r- wIL(. IT-TER ( 6T02 14 Jq 44 /L. QlN All tirA �- iNS�iN f>� i onr r) t F31 5-09-90 JOINT MEETING NOTES a/ 83 - Receive & file minute excerpts Director Culver introduced new Director Bob Main and Dick Edgar introduced new Director Charles (Chuck) Puckett. M4 - Election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tem DISTRICT 1 - James Wahner nominated for Chairman. Moved & seconded that nominations be closed. Charles Puckett nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 2 - Iry Pickler nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nom�s be closed. Roland Bigonger and James Neal nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Directors voted by a show of hands. James Neal elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 3 - Richard Polls nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Bob Siefen nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 5 - Evelyn Hart nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nomi�s be closed. Phil Sansone nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 6 - Ruthelyn Plummer nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nomm naETo—ns be closed. James Wahner nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 7 - Don Smith nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Sally Anne Sheridan nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Later in meeting reopened nominations. Sally Anne withdrew from nominations, and Richard Edgar was nominated and elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 11 - Grace Winchell nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nomi� be closed. Tom Mays nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 13 - Henry Wedaa nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominaFfons be closed. Wayne Wedin nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 14 - Peer Swan nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nomi� be closed. Sally Anne Sheridan nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Chairman Polls noted that Director Paul Verellen would be retiring after this meeting as he is moving from Stanton to Irvine. H6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman �./ SEE ATTACHED REPORT. Adopted Resolutions of appreciation for retiring Directors Ursula Kennedy (Reso. No. 90-39) and Bob Perry (Reso. No. 90-40). 5/09/90 With regard to CWPCA's Certificate of Merit presented to Omni Metal Finishing, Mr. Victor Salazar expressed appreciation to Directors and CWPCA for the recognition and gave a special thanks to his employees for the great job they �.s have done. Several employees also came forward to be recognized. David Wade, Plant Manager of Anaheim Citrus, accepted CWPCA's Large-Plant-of- the-Year award and expressed their appreciation. He briefly explained the steps they had taken to correct their system and how their process worked now. 66(b) - Report of the General Manager - No report 06(c) Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported on two memos in the Directors' folders relative to claims. Cravens, Dargen 8 Company is an old claim that has been settled and the memo was just for the Directors' information. He then reported on the second memorandum relative to Universal Circuits, Inc. The Districts obtained a ruling from Superior Court a week ago upholding the decision of the Executive Committee in making a finding relative to non-renewal of the industrial waste permit of Universal Circuits at their existing facility. Tom Woodruff added that he received a FAX from the counsel of UCI offering a proposal for resolution of (1) the lawsuit they initiated; (2) the lawsuit we initiated; and (3) issuance of new permit for their new building that is nearly completed in Santa Ana. Their application for a permit has been denied by the General Manager. It will be before the Executive Committee later this month. He said he hadn't had an opportunity to evaluate the proposal yet in order to make any recommendations. He will need to meet with the Districts' technical staff and will report to the Executive Committee on the May 23rd. Director Culver asked, since the judgment upheld the Districts' decision, why didn't the judge have them pay the General Counsel 's costs also? Tom explained that there is no provision that expressly provides for the prevailing party to obtain payment of attorney's fees unless it is contractually provided between the two parties. There are some exceptions but this is not one of them. Director Wedaa asked, since there are three outstanding points, is TLW's fees and this payment issue negotiable? Mr. Woodruff stated that he would prefer to comment on that in closed session if the Directors wanted to discuss it. Will bring this to the Executive Committee and will consider a lot of issues then. It is certainly possible. Will bring it up at Executive Committee meeting. Director Polis asked if they are shut down now? Mr. Woodruff answered no. They are anxious to move to new facility but the Order signed by Judge Weeks is kind of unusual. If they file an appeal , the restraining order is dissolved until the end of the appeal period. They are still doing business. #13 - Long-range Financial Plan update The General Manager reported that last year the Boards approved a 30-year Master Plan. Volume 8 was the Financial Plan of the 02020 Vision° plan. As part of the annual budget process, we have updated that Financial Plan and presented recommendations to the Directors on user fees and connection fees. He then reviewed the current fee schedules. Mr. Sylvester noted that the staff's summary report was included with the agenda mailing. -2- 5/09/90 Gary Streed, the Director of Finance, then addressed the Boards. He advised that as part of the budget process, since 1987 staff has been reviewing and planning for the next 10 years. Have known for many years which Districts would have financial deficits in the late 1980's and early 1990's. He reviewed past and anticipated deficits. In the past the Districts received grant funds. That program has been discontinued. He further reported on capital facilities connection fees. It is a one-time fee issued when a building permit is issued. Last year we proposed a change in the way the fee is calculated to include future, as well as exisitng, facilities. The Master Plan proposes this be adopted annually. It is a very small adjustment this year--$10. Each District has the same connection fees at this time. It would be difficult to have cities collect different fees for different Districts. Connection fees are for new capacity. With regard to user fees, referred to cash flows included with Directors agenda material . Briefly reviewed schedules. They are prepared in accordance with Financial Plan section of the Master Plan. Figures are based on renewal of the Districts' NPDES Permit. Will probably be two years before we know if permit will be renewed. He then commented on issuance of debt. Over the next 10 years all Districts except Districts 13 and 14 will issue some form of debt to meet capital needs. Another reason to issue debt is to smooth increases in user fees. Would be $250-300 per unit next year but debt could allow that increase to go slowly over a period of time. Debt is included in cash flows. Industrial firms pay additional fees. Some as high as $700,000-800,000 per year. The Director of Finance stated that the actions before the Boards that evening were to adopt increases in user fees and connection fees. Will review those fees next year again. These fees are submitted annually to the State Water Resources Control Board for their review also. No questions. Joint Chairman Catlin stated that he had asked the Director of Finance from his city (Fullerton) to review this report and recomendations. His comment had been that CSDOC had obviously done a very thorough analysis. He concurred with the statements of the Districts' Director of Finance. Bath increases are warranted based on the Master Plan. #14(a)(2) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11&13 - Report of General Counsel re Connection Fee rd nances TLW reported that these ordinances were introduced for first reading at last month's meeting. No changes. If ordinances are adopted, takes 60 days to become effective and, therefore, does not become effective until July 11th. Ma 2 - DISTRICTS 1 3 5 6 11&13 - Report of General Counsel re User Fee inances TLW reported that Districts 2, 7 and 14 do not have user fees. Introduced ordinances for six Districts at the last meeting. No changes since introduction. Ordinances establish user fees in accordance with schedules included with agenda material. -3- 5/09/90 #33 (a) - Staff report re Districts 3 8 11 facilities Tom Dawes reported on the Slater Avenue Pump Station capacity. He also reviewed District 11's ownership and capacity in the Knott Interceptor. It would be more economical to build a new pump station then to complete the Coast Trunk Sewer through the Bolsa Chica bluffs. Reveiwed new interceptor facilities required to be built. He noted that Districts 3 and 11 have shared capacities for a number of years. Cities are assigned ownership based on those capacity needs. A certain amount of capacity is proposed to be sold to District 3 and District 11 needs to buy capacity in District 3's lines. The net result will be District 3 will pay District 11 $631,000 for capacity in existing lines. Need to rebuild the Slater Pump Station and make sure that District 3 and 11 both own the new pump station and share in the construction cost to accordance with capacities--83WX owned by District 11 and the remainder by District 3. He then showed a slide of the present pump station and a picture of the proposed new pump station. Construction of the pump station, influent lines and discharge facilities are the first priority. Cost is about $7.5 million. ($1.0+ million for District 3 and the remainder for District 11). The cost-sharing formula is in resolution to be adopted that night. Re Bolsa Chica area, it has never annexed to the District. We have worked with Signal to develop an annexation agreement to provide sewer capacity for that area. The District has never received any money for the Bolsa Chica area. If the pump station was built for this area, it would be a larger size and at a larger cost. We are building these facilities to meet the cities' master plans. A few weeks ago, Bolsa Chica indicated that they are not interested right now in an annexation agreement. We decided we would therefore build smaller size facilities and won't provide for capacity for them. We will not have the benefit of getting some of their money up front. In the end we will get it someday. TMD reviewed the annexation charges and connection charges. These charges will be exactly the same even if they don't cone into the Slater system. The Director of Engineering reviewed the agenda items before the Directors. Director Neal asked how much money we were talking about between the smaller and larger pipe without Signal? TMD replied that the initial project was $750,000. Cost would go down about 10%. Would be about $3-4 million savings later. He noted that Henley acquired Signal Oil and therein came their change in heart. Director Pickler asked, does the City of Huntington Beach have any say? Tom advised that they are not yet within the City. Are in the sphere of influence. Asked if we had talked to H.B. and TMD replied yes. Director Siefen asked why we were going to reduce the capacity if they don't annex now as eventually, they will develop the area. Seems a little short sighted. Will potentially need the capacity. Tom Dawes advised that that is what we are trying to get a handle on. It seems wrong to not build that capacity in. The thinking that led us to this course of action is that it is hard to ask people right now to pay for Signal 's future capacity. Polls asked if they would be paying later? TMD replied that they could lay lines through Bolsa Chica and get into the Coast Trunk Sewer. -4- 5/09/90 Tom Woodruff then stated that if the property were to annex to the District, then we are faced with the question of duty to serve. Essentially, we probably do have a duty to serve if they are within the District. First issue is whether you are going to accept them for annexation. Probably couldn't force District to annex them. Polls asked if we build now or later, do they have to go through the Slater Pump Station? TMD advised that if Slater Pump Station is built to the smaller size, they will go to the Coast Trunk. Pickler asked, will we need the bigger size without Signal? TMD said staff couldn't recommend sizing to accommodate Signal . Siefen asked, what about the Conservancy group? TMD said staff had met with them many times but they are not aware of the most recent decision. He added that he didn't think there was any doubt that the annexation will go through eventually. Winchell commented that she would really hate to see Directors take a position that would let Signal off the hook. Thought they need to be told strongly it is their obligation to pay the money up front for capacity for them. Tom Woodruff stated that we can set the capacity the staff and Directors deem appropriate and necessary. If you want to go larger, it is permissible. Winchell added that if we take this action tonight, it would just give them the message. Culver said he somewhat agreed. Who is going to put up the front money if they don't? District 3 & 11? The General Manager explained that the Financial Plan discussed earlier includes issuance of debt to finance capital facilities. What it would mean if you decide to build capacity for Bolsa Chica without an annexation agreement is you would be paying money out of your own pocket for someone who is not yet a member of the club. The District would have to borrow more money and rate payers within the District would have to be paying for capacity to serve this area sometime in the future. Pickler stated that he didn't think we should wait on Signal. If they have to, they will just have to go to the Coast Trunk Sewer. Think we should go with plans. Mr. Sylvester advised that staff has written a letter to Signal setting forth in no uncertain terms their proposal and what the situation is. We have given them until May 15th so will report back at the next meeting. Siefen said he had changed his opinion and agreed with Winchell . We should say that they are stuck with the Coast Trunk Sewer. The General Manager advised that none of the Board actions requested that night were decisions re capacity. Culver asked how much Signal would pay? TMD advised $1.8 million for annexation fees plus connection fees of $2,280 per unit for 5,000 homes equaling $10 million. Polls wandered if this item should be continued. The General Manager reiterated that staff was not asking for a decision on this capacity issue tonight. Actions were just to receive and file report, and approve agreement re exchange of capacity between Districts 3 and 11. The decision on final design and sizing will come back at a future date. -5- REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN MAY 9, 1990 1) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING DIRECTORS. LAST MONTH, TWO OF OUR BOARD MEMBERS RETIRED FROM THEIR POSTS. OVER THE YEARS, THESE DIRECTORS HAVE NOT ONLY PERFORMED THEIR DUTIES AS CITY COUNCIL AND SANITARY DISTRICT MEMBERS WITH A HIGH DEGREE OF PROFESSIONALISM AND DEDICATION, BUT THEY HAVE ALSO BEEN EQUALLY INVOLVED IN THE WASTEWATER QUALITY PROGRAM OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS. I WOULD THEREFORE LIKE TO INTRODUCE FOR THE BOARDS' CONSIDERATION, ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS EXPRESSING OUR APPRECIATION TO THESE RETIRING DIRECTORS AND RECOGNIZING THEIR OUTSTANDING CONSTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE. RESOLUTION NO. DIRECTOR'S NAME CITY/AGENCY DISTRICT(S) 90-39 URSULA KENNEDY TUSTIN 14 90-40 BOB PERRY GARDEN GROVE 2 SANITARY DISTRICT - ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE - -I- 2) RECOGNITION OF ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL FIRMS RECENTLY PRESENTED WITH AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE BY THE CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION. AT ITS ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN APRIL, THE CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION RECOGNIZED THREE ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIES FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS IN PROMOTING WASTEWATER QUALITY, FOR CONSISTENTLY MEETING THEIR DISCHARGE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. AND FOR SERVING AS A MODEL FOR OTHER INDUSTRIES IN CONTROLLING, MANAGING AND REDUCING HAZARDOUS WASTES. NOMINATED BY THE DISTRICTS' SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION, TWO OF THESE FIRMS, OMNI METAL FINISHING AND HIXSON METAL FINISHING, BOTH LOCATED IN DISTRICT 6, WERE AWARDED THE CWPCA CERTIFICATE OF MERIT FOR MAINTAINING AN EXCELLENT RECORD OF PERMIT COMPLIANCE, INDUSTRIAL WASTE SOURCE CONTROL AND WASTE MINIMIZATION. THIS YEAR'S SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LARGE PLANT-OF-THE-YEAR AWARD WAS PRESENTED TO ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS, LOCATED IN DISTRICT 2. FOLLOWING THE INSTALLATION OF AN ON-SITE TREATMENT PLANT AND ANAEROBIC DIGESTER, ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS WAS ABLE TO REDUCE THE BOD IN THEIR EFFLUENT BY OVER 8OZ. IN ADDITION, THEY ARE NOW ABLE TO UTILIZE 300,000 CUBIC FEET PER DAY OF METHANE GAS, PRODUCED IN THEIR ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS, AS A SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCE OF FUEL FOR THEIR PROCESS DRYERS. THEY ALSO HAVE CONSISTENTLY BEEN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THEIR WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT. - ITEM 2 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE - -2- I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MR. VICTOR SALAZAR TO STEP FORWARD AND BE RECOGNIZED FOR OMNI METAL FINISHING'S CERTIFICATE OF MERIT. SIMILARLY. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MR. JIMMY KNIGHT TO STEP FORWARD AND BE RECOGNIZED FOR HIXSON METAL FINISHING'S CERTIFICATE OF MERIT. DAVID WADE, PLANT MANAGER I 'D LIKE TO ASK MR. "_""_- ."Re'1=". PRES* OF ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS, TO STEP FORWARD AND BE RECOGNIZED AS THE 1989 WINNER OF THE CWPCA'S LARGE PLANT-OF-THE-YEAR AWARD. I KNOW I SPEAK FOR THE ENTIRE BOARD WHEN I SAY THAT YOUR EFFORTS ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED AND YOU ARE TO BE CONGRATULATED AND COMMENDED FOR YOUR EFFORTS. (NOTE: ASK RECIPIENTS IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS. ) 3) GENERAL MANAGER ELECTED VICE PRESIDENT OF AMSA BOARD I AM PLEASED TO REPORT TO YOU THAT THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES RECENTLY HELD THEIR ANNUAL MEETING IN HOUSTON AND OUR GENERAL MANAGER WAS ELECTED VICE PRESIDENT OF THE ASSOCIATION. AMSA IS VERY ACTIVE IN LEGISLATIVE, REGULATORY AND TECHNICAL ISSUES AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL WITH OFFICES IN WASHINGTON, D.C. FOR THE INFORMATION OF THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE RELATIVELY NEW MEMBERS OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS' BOARDS, WAYNE IS ALSO A PAST PRESIDENT OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES. CASA IS SIMILAR TO AMSA, BUT AT THE STATE LEVEL. WAYNE ALSO SERVES CURRENTLY ON TRI-TAC AND, IN FACT, IS A PAST CHAIRMAN. TRI-TAC IS A TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THE STATE REGULATORY AGENCIES. IT IS COMPRISED OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM CASA AS WELL AS THE CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION AND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES. - ITEM 4 ON NEXT PAGE - -3- 4) COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS BECAUSE OF RECENT TURNOVER IN BOARD MEMBERSHIP THERE HAVE BEEN VACANCIES CREATED ON SOME OF THE BOARD COMMITTEES. I WOULD, THEREFORE, LIKE TO ANNOUNCE THE FOLLOWING APPOINTMENTS: - HANK WEDAA TO CHAIR THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - WAYNE WEDIN TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE; AND - ROBERT MAIN AND PHIL SANSONE TO THE SPECIAL REORGANIZATION COMMITTEE 5) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 16TH, AT 5:30 P.M. B. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES ARE SCHEDULED TO MEET JOINTLY ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 23RD, AT 5:30 P.M. C. JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 23RD, AT 7:30 P.M. , IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, MAY 31ST, AT 5:30 P.M. - END OF REPORT - -4- a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 39 59 69 79 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MAY ld, 1990 . R„1 SPaP°t ma,O��ITT n U D e m wa Q 81aea 19A E COO ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA �..r ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S. S. 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, B, 7, 11, 13 and 34 as follows: `v ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT MO. l: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Orma Crank =Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tam --Richard B. Edgar =Dan Griset Dan Young =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickier, Chairman Fred Hunter =James Neal, Chairman pro tem —George Scott =Roland E. Bigonger —Henry W. Wetlaa x A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Norby x Dan Griset _can Young x William D. Mahoney __Beth Graham =Robert H. Main Norman Culver =Garrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin =Arthur G. Newton _Norman Z. Eckenrode a Wayne Silzel _Harold Saldarini =Don E. Smith Fred Barrera =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairmen Eva G. Miner =J.N. "Bob" Siefen, Chairmen pro tem —Dewey Wiles a Margaret M. _ . Arnoltl Cecilia L. Age 7--Wes Bannister —Peter Green x A.B. 'Buck- Catlin __Chris Moray 7—Norman Culver _Robert H. Main x Beth Graham _William D. Mahoney =Don R. Griffin _Donna L. Chessen =Dan Griset _Dan Young x James Neal George Scott =Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin =Iry Pickier Fred Hunter =Roger Stanton Dan R. Roth =Charles Sylvia —_Robert Wahlstrom =Paul Verellen Edward L. Allen z Edna Wilson _Victor Grgas DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chai men Ruthetyn Plummer =Phil Sansone, Chairman pro two —John C. Cox, Jr. _Don R. Roth z Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chai man _Evelyn Hart =James Wanner, Chairman pro Lem James M. Ferryman _Don R. Roth %Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chat men Fred Barrera =Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tan —_Charles E. Puckett =John C. Cox, Jr. _Ruthetyn Plummer =_Dan Griset Dan Young Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton =Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran x James Wanner =Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winthell, Chairman Peter Green Tom Mays, Chairman pro tam =Jim Silva =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Wetlaa, Chai men Roland E. Bigonger =Wayne Wedin, Chairman pro tam _Garrey Nelson x Iry Pickier Fred Hunter Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton =Don E. Smith Fred Barrera DISTRICT NO. 14: Peer A. Swan, Chairman x Darryl Miller =Sally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tem Larry Agran \rr l _Leslie A. Pontious =Richard B. Edgar Don R. Roth =_Roger Stanton =Don E. Smith Fred Barrera 2 05/09/90 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Mark Esquer, Penny Kyle, John �..✓ Linder, Rory Nelson, Bob Ooten, Jack Vincent, Rich von Langen, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Jamel Demir, Conrad Hohener, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, Jimney Knight, David Wade, Ramiro Salazar, Jose A. Salazar, Don Willet, Victor M. Salazar, Ray Byerley, Tom Richardson, Steve Dworkin DISTRICTS 1, 2, 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excer is from the Garden Grove Sanitary That the minute excerpts from the District and the ulty or lustin re Garden Grove Sanitary District and the Board appointments - City of Tustin re appointment of alternate Directors and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) Agency District Active Director Alternate Director Garden Grove 2 Robert H. Main Norman E. Culver Sanitary Dist. City of Tustin 1 Charles E. Puckett Richard B. Edgar* 7 Richard B. Edgar* Charles E. Puckett 14 Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar* DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman hairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1. It was then moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Charles E. Puckett be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Puckett as Chairman pro tem. _ -3- ' 05/09/90 DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tam of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2. It was then moved: That Director Iry Pickier be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Pickler as Chairman. It was further moved: That Directors Roland Bigonger and James Neal be nominated as candidates for the office of Chairman pro tem. The vote was then polled by a show of hands, following which the Secretary announced that Director Neal had been elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which - Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations In order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3. It was then moved: That Director Richard T. Polls be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Polls as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director J. R. "Bob" Siefen be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Siefen as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5. It was then moved: That Director Evelyn Hart be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hart as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Phil Sansone be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. -There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sansone as Chairman pro tem. -4- 05/09/90 ' DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6. It was then moved: That Director Ruthelyn Plummer be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Plummer as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7. It was then moved: That Director Don E. Smith be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Smith as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Sally Anne Sheridan be nominated for _ the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sheridan as Chairman pro tem. After a caucus by the Board, Director Sheridan withdrew from the post of Chairman pro tem, following which Director Richard B. Edgar was duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11. It was then moved: That Director Grace Winchell be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winchell as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Tom Mays be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Mays as Chairman pro tem. ^ -5- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 13 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13. It was then moved: That Director Henry W. Wedaa be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wedaa as Chairman. It was further moved: That Dlrector Wayne Wedin be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wedin as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 14 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14. It was then moved: That Director Peer A. Swan be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Swan as Chai roan. It was further moved: That Director Sally Anne Sheridan be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sheridan as Chairman pro tem. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that Adoption of Resolutions of Directors Ursula Kennedy and Bob Perry Appreciation for retiring Directors had announced their retirement from the Boards of Directors. Ursula Kennedy, serving on the District 14 Board, has represented the City of Tustin for approximately four years. Bob Perry has represented the Garden Grove Sanitary District for the last 16 years on the District No. 2 Board. The Joint Chairman then introduced resolutions expressing the Boards' appreciation to these retiring Directors. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions expressing their appreciation to the retiring Directors and recognizing their outstanding contributions and dedication to public, service: Resolution No. Director City/Agency District 90-39 Ursula Kennedy Tustin 14 90-40 Bob Perry Garden Grove Sanitary Dist. 2 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. -6- 05/09/90 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that at eco ni ion o n us r a its annual conference in April , the schar ers-- n Metal Finishin California Water Pollution Control xson Metal n s in and Anaheim Association had presented awards of Citrus ro uc s--for receivin excellence and certificates to three PCA awards of excelience Orange County industrial firms. The purpose of the awards is to stimulate interest on the part of industry to take positive steps to meet strict water pollution control standards. These firms, nominated by the Districts' Industrial Waste Division inspectors, were recognized for their efforts over the past year to comply with Districts' discharge requirements and foster an awareness in the business community for the need to control industrial wastewater to help protect public health and the environment. The Joint Chairman then recognized Mr. Victor Salazar of Omni Metal Finishing as well as several other employees from the firm, recipient of a CWPCA Certificate of Merit; Mr. Jimmy Knight of Hixson Metal Finishing, recipient of a CWPCA Certificate of Merit; and Mr. David Wade, Plant Manager of Anaheim Citrus Products, recipient of CWPCA's Large Plant-of-the-Year award. Chairman Catlin presented each of the industry representatives the awards recognizing their exemplary performance. On behalf of the Boards of Directors, Chairman Catlin commended the firms and expressed the Boards' appreciation for their efforts. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that Report of the Joint Chairman the Districts' General Manager, Wayne Sylvester, was recently elected Vice President of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) at their annual meeting in Houston. AMSA is very active in legislative, regulatory and technical issues at the national level with offices in Washington, D.C. The Joint Chairman then noted that because of recent turnover in Board membership, there have been vacancies created on some of the Boards' Committees. Chairman Catlin announced the following appointments to various Committees: Director Committee Post Henry Wedaa Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee Chairman Wayne Wedin Fiscal Policy Committee Member Robert Main Special Reorganization Committee Representative, District 2 Phil Sansone Special Reorganization Committee Representative, District 5 Joint Chairman Catlin then reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 16th, at 5:30 p.m. He also called a joint meeting of the Executive Committee and the Fiscal Policy Committee for Wednesday, May 23rd, at 5:30 p.m.. Mr. Catlin further reported that a special Joint Works Selection Committee meeting had been scheduled for Wednesday, May 23rd, immediately following the joint Executive Committee/Fiscal Policy Committee meeting. The Joint Chairman also advised that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, May 31st, at 5:30 p.m. -7- 05/09/90 ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly reported Report of the General Counselon the settlement of a claim filed several years ago by Cravens, Dargen a Company as a result of a sewer backup in District 7. He also reported on the status of pending litigation relative to Universal Circuits, Inc. (UCI) concerning the Districts' decision not to renew the Industrial waste discharge permit for their facility on Newport Circle in Santa Ana. Mr. Woodruff advised that he had just received a proposal from Universal Circuit's attorney relative to resolution of the lawsuits filed by UCI and the Districts relative to the Newport Circle plant, as well as UCI 's application for an industrial waste permit for their new facility currently being constructed on South Yale in Santa Ana which the Districts had recently denied. He noted that he had not yet had an opportunity to evaluate the proposal but would report further on the matter at the Executive Committee meeting scheduled for May 23rd. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, nor the adjourned regular meeting held April 18, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, .nor the adjourned regular meeting held April 5, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or �..r Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -8- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of of nt and Individual District Maims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 4/11/90 4/25190 ALL DISTRICTS JoUp—ating Fund - $ 564,949.79 $ 946,387.45 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 2,044,463.55 354,973.08 Joint Working Capital Fund - 212,846.74 186,375.58 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 13,922.72 11,743.17 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 338.00 135.72 DI TRISENCT 2 - 8,090.58 12,771.73 DISC - 18,459.41 3,384.51 DD TRIG - 5,808.77 7,539.74 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 230.71 9,197.99 DISDIS RI�fN77 - 16,126.40 82,380.68 DI TRS 1�N�11 - 4,319.12 6,749.59 DIDI TRIG - 38.00 -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - 5,406.93 28,456.16 DI TRISCT NTS.5 & 6 JOINT - 24,599.59 3,058.81 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,274.67 11,519.63 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 2,035.92 3,690.44 2,923,9TO 1,668,36 . ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Video Inspection eryices for Districts Sewers and Manholes, That the bid tabulation and Decification No. - 4 , to PSS, Inc. recommendation re award of purchase order contract for Video Inspection Services for Districts' Sewers and Manholes, Specification No. S-045, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to PSS, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $164,786.00 for a two-year period beginning May 15, 1990. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Chan a Order No. 2 to t o p ans and specifications for That Change Order No. 2to the plans Jab No. P1-33 and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $21,371.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. for three items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -9- �".� 05/09/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Chan e r er o. 3 to the tans antl s ecificat ons for That Change Order No. 3 to the plans Job No. P1- -1 and specifications for Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and 8 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1, authorizing an addition of $92,392.00 to the contract with S. A. Healy Co. 6 Assoc. for seven items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovss one n ddendum o. to the Profe Services A reement That the Selection Committee w Boyle En ineerin Cor oration certification of the final negotiated for design of JOD NO. J-17 fee relative to Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, providing for wage escalations and construction management/inspection services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-41, approving said Addendum No. 2 to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, for additional services on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, for an additional amount not to exceed $6,438.00 for wage escalations due to delays in the project, plus construction management/ inspection services at the rate of $80.00 per hour, including overhead and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $156,160.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $329,105.00 to an amount not to exceed $491,703.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for adopt Resolution No. 90-42, approving technical and environmental support Addendum No. 1 to the Professional services re 1989 Collection, Services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Treatment and N osal Faciscilities Inc. for technical and environmental Master Pan EIR and Ocean Dharge support services relative to the 1989 Permit renewal application Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Environmental Impact Report and Ocean Discharge Permit renewal application, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $304,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing ta General Manager to issue a urchase order to outhern That the General Manager be, and is alifornia Edison om an re hereby, authorized to issue a purchase installat on of added under round order to Southern California Edison facilities to provide for a Company in the amount of $69,499.00 4,000 kw, Standby electrical power and execute necessary documents, in service for Plant No. 1 form approved by the General Counsel , for installation of added underground `►' facilities to provide for a 4,000 kw, standby electrical power service for Plant No. 1. -10- 05/09/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a urchase order to Solar Turbines, That staff be, and is hereby, Inc. (Specification No. R-036) authorized to issue a purchase order to Solar Turbines, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $45,000.00 plus sales tax for Repairs to Solar Energy Generator No. 3 at Plant No. 1 (Specification No. R-036). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Boards' action of April 11, 1990, revoking authorization to That the Boards' action of April 11, issue a purchase order to Michael 1990, be, and is hereby, amended, Chevrolet ono authorizing staff to revoking authorization for staff to issue a purchase order to Folsom Lake issue a purchase order to Michael Ford Specification No. A-150-2 Chevrolet in the amount of $86,535.00 plus tax for the purchase of nine Chevrolet S10 pick-up trucks (Specification No. A-150-2) ; and authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Folsom Lake Ford in the amount of $84,331.89 plus tax and delivery charges for purchase of nine Ford Ranger pick-up trucks (Specification No. A-150-2) , in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program of the State of California and State of California Contract No. 1-90-23-20. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Denying Application for Permission to Present Late Claim of Lynn Redman That the Application for Permission to Present Late Claim for personal injuries filed by Leatrice L. Cohen, attorney for claimant Lynn Redman, be, and is hereby, denied. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on April 25, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing policies and procedures for selection and procurement of That the Boards of Directors hereby professional engineering, adopt Resolution No. 90-43, architectural , environmental , land establishing policies and procedures surveying and construction for the selection and procurement of management services professional engineering, architectural , environmental , land surveying and construction management services. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order t0 F. E. Carleton That staff be, and is hereby, for professional consulting services authorized to issue a purchase order re obtaining SCAQMD permits and to F. E. Carleton in an amount not to other SCAQMD issues exceed $50,000.00 for professional c insulting services, on an as-needed basis, at the rate of $95.00 per hour, for a two-year period beginning May 10, 1990, to assist the Districts in obtaining permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for current and future projects at both treatment plants, and for assistance relative to other SCAQMD issues. -11- 05/09/90 DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7.11 6 13 toff re ort re on -ran a Financ a Plan update and 1990- 1 Sewer Connection Fee and Use Fee Recommendations Verbal staff report The General Manager reported that to July 1989, as part of the Districts' 112020 VISION" 30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, the Boards approved a Financial Plan prepared by the Action Plan consulting team. Basically, the Financial Plan provides for financing sewerage facilities expansion (capacity increases) by sewer connection fees paid by new development; facilities rehabilitation and improved treatment by borrowing capital funds in the securities market (certificates of participation) ; and operations, maintenance and new debt service by a combination of property taxes and user fees. At the April Board Meeting, when ordinances to fix the sewer connection fees and use fees for 1990-91 were introduced for first reading, some Directors requested that additional information on the long-range plan be provided to the Boards. When the Boards originally reviewed the various elements of the Master Plan the primary document utilized was the "2020 VISION" Preliminary Report and Executive Summary. Therefore, prior to this meeting a full copy of the adopted Financial Plan, which is Volume 8 of the approved Master Plan, was mailed for the Directors' review. It describes the Financial Plan in considerable detail and also provides a summary in Chapter 1. Each year, as part of the budget process, staff updates the fiscal projections and recommends connection and user fee rates required to finance Districts' activities for the ensuing year. Also enclosed with the mailing was a separate staff report reflecting the updated estimates for those Districts now considering their 1990-91 rates. At this point the original Master Plan projections are pretty much on target and, in fact, in most instances, the fee projections are actually lower than estimated in the Master Plan. However, Districts' activities are dictated by regulatory authorities whose actions can cause major changes in the requirements and the cost of the Districts' wastewater management program. Wastewater management costs will continue to escalate for four basic reasons: (1) Stricter environmental standards and regulations; -(2) The federal and state governments no longer fund 8754 percent of facilities for improved treatment; (3) Normal Inflationary trends; and, (4) Rising flows. The Director of Finance then reported that for many years the Districts, as part of the annual budgetary process, have forecast revenues and expenditures on a five-year basis and since 1986-87 have used a ten-year horizon. The purpose of this long-range financial planning is to assure that adequate funding is available to carry out the Districts' wastewater management program for the protection of public health and the environment, and the benefit of the communities and the two million citizens which the Districts serve in metropolitan Orange County. A major benefit of the long-range cash flow projections is that they r..✓ enable a determination well in advance of when revenue shortfalls will begin to occur so that the Boards of Directors will have adequate time to consider alternative funding measures and take the necessary actions to ensure each District's financial integrity. -12- 05/09/90 For some time projections have indicated that funding shortfalls would occur throughout the Districts during the latter part of the 1980's and early 1990's, and that each District would have to consider additional revenue sources to meet long-term funding requirements for sewerage facilities improvements and expansion and ongoing operations and maintenance costs. Property taxes, connection fees and federal and state construction grants have historically been the major source of local financing of District's activities. However, since Proposition 13 all ad valorem property tax revenue has been used in the Operating Funds for maintenance, operations and rehabilitation and none has been available for capital improvements. The costs of providing service continue to rise beyond the ability of the property tax apportionments and the past connection fee schedules to keep pace with the stringent requirements of the federal , state and regional regulatory agencies for advanced wastewater treatment and air emissions control , and the need to provide additional facilities to meet the increasing demands on the sewerage system. The Director of Finance further reported that the capital facilities charge (connection fee) is a one-time fee collected at the time a building permit is issued and provides for capacity for new development. The Districts' 30-year Master Plan adopted in 1989 proposed that this fee be reviewed and adjusted annually. The recommended adjustment is for an increase of $10 per unit effective with the 1990-91 fiscal year. The connection fees are identical in each District to accommodate the collection by the cities on behalf of the various Districts. Mr. -Streed then briefly reviewed the proposed increases in the sanitary sewer service charges (user fees) of Districts 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13, commenting on the cash flow schedules upon which the staff's recommendations for adjustments effective with the 1990-91 fiscal year were based. He noted that District No. 2 just recently enacted an ordinance adopting sanitary sewer service charges and, therefor, does not need to make any adjustments at this time. District No. 7 has not yet adopted sewer service charges, and the Irvine Ranch Water District collects and pays user fees to District No. 14 in lieu of District 14 adopting separate sewer service charges. He noted that in addition to the aforementioned fees, industrial firms pay a separate user fee based on their actual demand on the sewerage system as determined by the provisions of the Districts' uniform Industrial waste ordinance. The Director of Finance also reported that in accordance with the recommendations contained in the Financial Plan included as part of the 30-year Master Plan, all Districts, except District 14 and possibly District 13, will need to issue some form of debt over the next 10 years to meet approximately one-half of the capital needs. The issuance of debt also allows a more gradual and stabilized annual adjustment of user fees to meet fiscal obligations than would otherwise be required on a cash pay-as-you-go basis. -13- 05/09/90 Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated April 25, 1990 re Long-range Financial Plan Update and 1990-91 Sewer Connection and Use Fee Recommendations, be, �.. and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 & 13 Public hearing and adoption of ordinances increasing capital facilities connection charges Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,. 6, 7, 11 and 13 for a public hearing on the following proposed Ordinances, Amending Ordinances Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities: Amending Repealing District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 1 115 113 114 2 211 208 209 3 313 311 312 5 522 520 521 6 616 614 615 7 724 722 723 11 1112 1110 1111 13 1307 1305 1306 Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:20 p.m. Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel reported that the proposed ordinances, making adjustments in the capital facilities connection charges for each of the eight Districts, were introduced for first reading at the April Board meeting. He stated that no changes had been made to the ordinances since that meeting. If adapted, the ordinances will take effect July 11, 1990. Close hearing The Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:21 p.m. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 115 That proposed Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 114, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its .r entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 115 by title only. -14- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting ordinance No. 115 by the following roll call vote: AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Dan Griset, Charles E. Puckett, Roger R. Stanton \,d NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 114, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Readin of Pro osed Ordinance No. 21 That proposed Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 209, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 211 by title only. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. Z11 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Iry Pickler, Chairman, Roland E. Bigonger, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Dan Griset, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Don E. Smith, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: Wayne Silzel That Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 209, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance Na. 313 That proposed Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and ^ Repealing Ordinance No. 312, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 313 by title only. -15- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 31T by the following roll call vote: AYES: Richard T. Polls, Chairman, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Norman E. Culver, Beth Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickler, J. R. "Bob" Slefen, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Paul Verellen, Edna Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: Margaret M. Arnold That Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 312, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading Of Proposed Ordinance No. 522 That proposed Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance NO. 520 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 521, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 522 by title only. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 522 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Evelyn Hart, Chairman, Phil Sansone, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 520 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 521, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 616 That proposed Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the ,Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance NO. 615, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said Ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 616 by title only. -16- 05/09/90 ' DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 616 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 615, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ord nonce No. 724 That proposed Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 723, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 724 by title only. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 7 4 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Dan E. Smith, Chairman, John C. Cox, Jr. , Richard B. Edgar, Dan Griset, Sally Anne Sheridan, Roger R. Stanton, James A. wanner NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 723, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT it Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 1112 That proposed Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1111, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1112 by title only. -17- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 1112 by the fallowing roll call vote: AYES: Grace H. Winchell , Chairman, Tam Mays, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1111, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 1307 That proposed Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No.. 1306, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1307 by title only. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adapting Ordinance No. 13 7 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman, Iry Pickler, Don E. Smith, Roger R. Stanton, Wayne D. Wedin NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1306, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13 Public hearing and adoption of ordinances increasing sanitary sewer service charges Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, it and 13 for a public hearing on the following proposed Ordinances, Amending Ordinances Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: la,.' -18- 05/09/90 Amending Repealing District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 1 116 109 112 �.✓ 3 314 309 N/A - 5 523 516 519 6 617 609 fill 8 613 11 1113 1108 1109 13 1308 1303 N/A Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:24 p.m. Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel reported that the proposed ordinances, providing for adjustments to the sanitary sewer service charges, were introduced for first reading at the April Board meeting. He stated that no changes had been made. If adopted, the ordinances will take effect July 1, 1990. Close hearing The Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:25 p.m. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 116 That proposed Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 116 by title only. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 116 by the following roll call vote: AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Dan Griset, Charles E. Puckett, Roger R. Stanton NOES: . None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No,- 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be, and is hereby, adopted. -19- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 314 That proposed Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 314 by title only. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 314 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Richard T. Polis,. Chairman, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Norman E. Culver, Beth Graham, Dan R. Griffin, Dan Griset, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickier, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Paul Verellen, Edna Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: Margaret M. Arnold That Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 523 That proposed Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 523 by title only. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 527 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Evelyn Hart, Chairman, Phil Sansone, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance bf the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be, and is hereby, adopted. 20 05/09/90 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 611 That proposed Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. fill and 613, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 617 by title only. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adapting Ordinance No. 617 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Propose Ordinance No. 1113 That proposed Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No.- 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1113 by title only. . DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 111 by the fallowing roll call vote: AYES: Grace H. Winchell , Chairman, Tom Mays, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1iud Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, be, and is hereby, adopted. -21- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 1308 That proposed Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1308 by title only. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 1308 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman, Iry Pickler, Don E. Smith, Roger R. Stanton, Wayne D. Wedin NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Directing the County Auditor- Controller to include sewer service That the Boards of Directors hereby charges on property tax bills adopt the following resolutions commencing with 1990-91 fiscal year directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinances of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 of Orange County, commencing with the 1990-91 fiscal year: District Resolution No. Ordinance No. 1 90-44-1 116 3 90-45-3 314 5 90-46-5 523 6 90-47-6 617 11 90-48-11 1113 13 90-49-13 1308 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. -22- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin han a Order o. 6 to the plans and specificat ons for That Change Order No. 6 to the plans Contract Pos.2-Z6- and 2-27 and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, an Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, authorizing an addition of $77,778.00 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp. for six items of additional work and granting a time extension of 14 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to issue a urchase order to Southern That the General Manager be, and is California Gas Company for relocation hereby, authorized to issue a purchase of gas main in order to construct order to Southern California Gas Contract No. Z-Z8 Company in an amount not to exceed $70,000.00 and to execute necessary documents, in form approved by the General Counsel , for relocation of approximately 1,400 feet of 4-inch diameter gas main required in connection with construction of the Katella Relief Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-28. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 o the l ons and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Contract Nos. -Z7-1 and 5- 7-2 and specifications for Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2, authorizing an addition of $1,305.00 to the contract with National Plant Services, Inc. for additional video inspection services, and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for delay in starting the project to allow the contractor to complete emergency repair work to sewers in San Francisco damaged by the October 1990 earthquake, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract Nos. 5-27-1 and 5-37-2 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-50, accepting Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1. and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. -23- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m., May 9, 1990. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 1 Garrett Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-51-7, ordering annexation of 2.47 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Amapola Avenue and Orange Park Boulevard in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 129 - Garrett Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Reimbursement Agreemen with George Adams, Jr. That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-52-7, approving Reimbursement Agreement with George Adams, Jr. , providing for reimbursement to Mr. Adams by the District of a proportional share of his cost of constructing a sewer line in Baja Panorama Street, to be collected from the owners of Lots 7 and 9 of Tract No. 939 upon connection to the sewer. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m., May 9, 1990. -24- 05/09/90 DISTRICTS 3 8 11 Actions re fi nancin desi n construc on, capacity Ownership and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities for serving Districts 3 and 11; and the Bolsa Chico area resen tl outside the Dis ricts oundaries Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that studies have been completed over the past several years which analyzed and prioritized the needed sewage facilities for serving certain areas within District 3 and District 11, and the area generally described as Bolsa Chica which is presently outside the Districts' boundaries, concluding that the long-planned extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer should be replaced with the reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station by both Districts 3 and 11, and recommending that construction costs be shared in accordance with sewage flows generated from each District. This change is projected to save District 3 $600,000 and District 11 $4,700,000. Said studies include a 1988 report prepared by Willdan Associates which dealt with the possible exchange of drainage areas between Districts 3 and 11; the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan (30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, "2020 VISION") ; and a recently-completed Project Report on the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17. The Director of Engineering reviewed various elements of the reports, noting that the most urgent improvements needed are the reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station including the influent and discharge facilities for the pump station. These facilities will cost approximately $7,600,000. The second priority is replacement of the Goldenwest Trunk Sewer, between Heil Avenue and Slater Avenue, at a cost of $4,300,000. He also noted that additional facilities required include the parallel Slater Avenue Trunk, the Heil Avenue Interceptor, improvements to facilities in Warner Avenue west of Springdale Street, and new lines in Springdale and Goldenwest Streets north of McFadden Avenue and Edinger Avenue, respectively. Mr. Dawes advised that the proposed capacity exchanges in certain existing and proposed sewage facilities would result in a net equity purchase from District 11 by District 3 in the amount of $630,836.00. He added that the proposed agreement between Districts 3 and it would provide for payment by District 3 in the amount of $1,050,000 and District 11 in the amount of $16,950,000 for the total cost of facilities described above, including the joint $7,600,000 reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station, influent sewers and discharge facilities. The necessary capital for these facilities could be provided by fees from the development of Bolsa Chica and other vacant areas within the northwesterly portion of District 11 if collected on a timely basis. For District 3, the development of Holly-Seacliff properties would more than offset the funding necessary for their prorated share of the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements. -25- 05/09/90 With regard to development of the Bolsa Chica area, staff reported that In April 1987 the Directors of District 11 authorized staff and General Counsel to negotiate with owners of approximately 1,608 acres in the Bolsa Chica area. The Signal Bolsa Corporation is the principal landowner. The Bolsa Chica area 1s presently outside the boundary of District 11 but within its sphere of influence. Signal Bolsa principals and counsel and Districts' staff and counsel have met numerous times over the past several years in an attempt to come to a pre-annexation agreement. However, Signal Bolsa Corporation is not yet ready to annex and recently advised staff that they are no longer willing to proceed with the proposed pre-annexation agreement. The last draft of the proposed agreement provided for the annexation of the Bolsa Chica area and pre-payment of fees for those areas to be developed by Signal Bolsa to provide the necessary funding for construction of capacity in the Slater Pump Station system to serve the Bolsa Chica if and when it is annexed. Staff emphasized that it is necessary to proceed with design and construction of the Slater Pump Station system and the Districts cannot delay the project any longer waiting for Signal Bolsa Corporation to make up its mind on the issue of a pre-annexation agreement. The Director of Engineering pointed out that if capacity for the Bolsa Chica is not included in the Slater Pump Station system, Signal Bolsa would have to construct its own sewer lines through the Bolsa Chica area and tie into the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer at a cost that would be substantially higher than putting up the money now for capacity in the Slater Pump Station system. Funding and construction of the facilities to connect to the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer would have to be provided by the property owners/developers. Staff and Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion relative to whether or not the Slater Avenue Pump Station should be sized to provide for capacity for the Bolsa Chica area. In response to a request for clarification on the issue of whether or not to include capacity for Bolsa Chica in the Slater Avenue Pump Station system, the staff and General Counsel pointed out that if such capacity was included without the benefit of a pre-annexation agreement with the property owners to provide the necessary funding, in effect the rate-payers in Districts 3 and 11 would have to front the costs without any assurance that they would be recovered in the future. Staff further advised that because of the urgent need to proceed withdesign and construction of the facilities they had notified Signal Bolsa Corporation that they must make a decision by May 15, 1990 on the pre-annexation agreement, and that without such an agreement the Districts could provide no assurance that the area could be annexed or provided sewerage service by the Districts in the future. It was also pointed out that officials representing the City of Huntington Beach, in whose sphere of influence Bolsa Chica also lies, have been .kept apprised of the matter. Following further discussion it was the consensus of the Directors that unless a pre-annexation agreement is executed by the Bolsa Chica property owners, capacity to serve the area should not be included in the Districts' sewage system. .J -26- 05/09/90 Staff noted that the Directors were not being asked that evening to make a decision on the capacity issue. Final design and sizing of the Slater Avenue Pump Station system will be presented to the Board for ^- consideration at a future date. Receive file and approve Staff Moved, seconded and duly carried: epor That the Staff Report dated May 1, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Receive file a rove and ado t Moved, seconded and duly carried: he roject Report re on tract o. 11-17 prepared by John Larollo That the Project Report relative Engineers to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, dated April 3, 1990, prepared by John Carollo Engineers, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, approved and adopted. Approving Agreement between Moved, seconded and duly carried: Districts 3 and 11 re financing, design, construction, capacity That the Boards of Directors ownershi and o eration df certain hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-53, sewage collection foci i ies approving Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 providing for financing, design, construction, capacity ownership and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities for serving Districts 3 and 11. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Authorizing staff and General Moved, seconded and duly carried: Counse7 t0 ne otiate with General Telephone and lectronics GTE t0 That staff and General Counsel secure a site adjacent to existing be, and are hereby, authorized to Slater Avenue Pump Station for negotiate with General Telephone construct on of new pump s a ion and Electronics (GTE) to secure a site adjacent to the existing Slater Avenue Pump Station for construction of the new pump station, providing for the exchange of the existing, smaller site for the new site, upon abandonment of the existing pump station; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute the necessary Cxuments to effect such exchange, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment to GTE in an amount not to exceed $25,000.00 for said exchange, be, and is hereby, authorized. -27- �•✓ 05/09/90 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment `../ That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m. , May 9, 1990. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m. , May 9, 1990. Secretary of Di'a tors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 69 7, 11, 13 and 14 -28- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/04/90 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP45 CLAIMS PAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE P4/11/90 WARRANT Nn_ vrun unOuT nrn rN rP+rnu F 105996 ASS VENT. INC. 4187.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS ;9 ( 105998 ASK INDUSTRIES CORP. S472.80 "BRING USES PRE OVERPAYMENT n 105999 AIR 'PRODUCTS S"'CHEMICAL 'INC. S948.36 PACKING NATERIALs 106PD1 SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA $2.604.19 INGTRGFENT/SAPE'CY SUPPLIES 106002 ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. $59.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT w 106004 ALVARADO HILLS, INC. '$139.22 REFUND USSR PER OVERPAYMENT !� 106005 ' AMEN. INST. L.A. TECH. CENTER '.S995.D0 TRAINING CLASS REGISTRATION MEIAL URNS 59' 106007 BOSCO INC. L/OR AMERICAN SEALS 11,111.17 SEALS/GASKETS 106086 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $329.38 FILM '0 106010 ANAHEIM 'MEOICAL SQUARE" " "'$89.81 REFORM USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 10 106011' ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 527.654.75 , SEUSR REPAIRS' ..." AAUIEPE.i ruw ro 'nn_ .Tu_Nu RerRnu pl 106013 SLAM P. ANGERSON - $675.44 MEETING MUSE ` 106014 ANTNONY•S MECH. S MACHINE. INC 92.628.20 MECHANICAL PARTS ry x rRcnr4 eo TIC EL n r .4.4-.P. ml/MRn env GUXTPRR 106016 AQUAN8IOASSAY S CONSULTING $2.110.00 DCBANRSA U 106017 ARATES. SERVICES. INC. $3,544.70 UNIFORM SERVICE H' 166019 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $944.04 INSTRUMENT REPAIR !J y� 106020 ART WORKS $544.27 FRAMING SERVICES N a 106022 BFM 'ENERGY PRODUCTS CORP. S4.382.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 186023 BFM TGANSPORT DYNAN IC$ CORP. ' .; 5678.52 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT .ncnnA vAlrw�rv.vsnAu's rou.nr'. ...n.T.._.T rear nnmver. N n zla_sR 106C25 SALLY RETAIL. INC. $150.00 BACKUP CLAIM 106C26 BANCROFT-WXITNET CO. $430.65 PUBLICATION ' 106028 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1.246.71 LAB SUPPLIES 106029 BLA87U$ E,LECTMIC TRUCK. INC. $07.71 ELECTRIC CARP PARTS ]ASCII ROYJ d.IPr ...._.. TRDrR.1.TR !r, 106031 BORLAND INTERNATIONAL SB7.62 PUBLICATIONS 106032 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $904.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES SI N' 106034 BROWN B CALOVELL CONSULTING 1218._115.21 EIIGINEBRING SERVICES 3-19 106035. - BURNE EHRINEERIN6 CO.. . $1016.31 MOTOR F.MD1T 106037 C S D GREASE COMPANY $1.308.37 REFUND USER FEE OVQRPAYMEMT Fl 106030 CFT $164.45 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT N. 116010 CAL-CHEM SALES $36.76 HARDWARE R° 106041 CAL SOUTH EQUIPMENT CO. $502.50 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION H . w FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/0419; PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AF43 CLAIMS PAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE 64/12/90 I� .� 156042 CALTROL • INC. S714•23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _ - UGK-PARTs 106044 EAUF ENERGY EpMM" ?U0. M4-13 $64.58 YOBLICATION ' 106045 CASA GRANDE CONVALESCENT MOSP $612.63 REFUND USER FIN GIMPATNEICIfl - .nAneA r�+- ••.710 4 •i7Cx '3.7.6-+e BV6THl114BB¢14F6T¢BIR " rH10!NONE 1660e7 CNTR. FOR ADVANCED PROF. DIV. fl•390.00 RECISTRATIOP .. 206048 CENTURY SAFETY INST. f SUPP. 5362.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES M1A— RSJPSAM� u R&-F66OVS8PA41@NT 30605p CHP7STE ENGINEER I 530.068.00 SEVER BRING SERVICES ID6051 CHURCH-ENGINEER IN6.- 1NC. S1.ST2.Sl ENGINEERING SOIVICE6 7-13 106053 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $21.047.63 PUMP PARTS 1, n06U51 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV• $16.41 MumMumPARTS . ee . e7E0 ELF pT IC'L 675• t7 772-71 ¢LE6TR¢C GDPPLIRG 101156 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $5.912.61 CEARINE M.O.10-I1-87 &DAUNT CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS - }9.190.75 BLUEPRINTING 7-12-89 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES - 106059 ROSS COOK. INC. 5953.03 SLAVER REPAIRS IT7 10606E COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC. $1.115.179.85 ENGINES M.0.5-13-67.6-8-88. J-19A ngGERETC UVPLTAG P'= 106062 [ DAVID WILLIAM CRAPNELL ':c 5367.93 BRDCRORE SERVICES. - M� 106063 CRAFT SHIFTS. INC 52.652.06 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT C ^"JNA ITT '2011e e0 40NPBW GLR Rc J 7 4 B—I IVS065 CAL WATER r ' x•• $136.75 RER'AL EQUIPMEE ,..In 106866 LARRY CURTI TRUCK 8 EQUIPMENT $22.040.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.4-13-88 14 EIIRAB-ReGId'FRAriON N 10606p - -- EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 45.168.61 STATE IINPI�LDY1!¢tlT IN6 C8 .y 106069 T. CA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT $334.09 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT A A,.n nnxrne T•er SEuu— T2�200 A. =Ms ^j 106071 OATAPRO RESEARCH CORP. $738.30 PUBLICATION !6x�1 106072 DE ANZA CORPORATION i4.5T3.61 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT m o®vaspR 106074 DICKSONS 5133.88 ELECTRIC PARTS - /' 106075 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 511997.72 PRINTING - 1n1n71 III.CTTAl .E0UIR RV¢CR-AGRBBI®VI 106C77 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. S25.721.64 PLART MAINTENANCE 6 RBPAISS K106078:21DUNKEL BROS. MACH MOVING $900.00 ENGINE UNLOADING COSTS rs A06080 EASTMAN• INC. $2.389.79 DPpIa SUPPLIER - 10608 EL TOFITO 6PILL St86.35 REFUND USSR PEE OVELPATMSNE .nen o1^ fYu•Rnuxsxr A. eren .e rr eeenr_ - — S .1— �" 106083 JEFF ESKER $171.36 MILEAGE J 106084 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. f121.80 BARDWARE MX 106086 FEDERAL R_ re.xrxS CORP. AIR MIGHT -SERVICB.CJ-7-.rJ-2D .u�. 106087 FEDERAL EMPRESS CDpP. SSt.90 AIR AREICRT :�. 306U87. FERRELLGAS tg5.90 PROPANE N u' I FUND NO 9199 . JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/04/99 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 04/1L/90 POSTING BATE C4/11/90 ^ J 106088 FICO`S APPLIANCE SERVICE $70.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIESR. SOFAM" 106090 _ - -FILTER. SUPPLY CO. S111.11 - PILTmS 106091 FISCHER S PORTER CO. '$1,390.03 CHLORINATION PARTS L06082 -'. ISM `: •`FC--C^ °:52 .fine 73 6AB PDPP6F8N _ n 106093 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $43.50 FILM Iu. 166094 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $6,125.44 WATER USEAGE 106296 SRS RESTAURANT SVCS $6.757.86 - REPEH UGER FEE UPERPATMENT Li 106097 GARDEN GROVE PROF. BLDG. $136.66 REFUND USER Y88 OVERPAYMENT ...... ` ^`pGL1S` iN STAkk ERS sum 00 6BRM ARA L06099 GENERAL•TELEPHONE CO. $1.693.61 TELEPHONE SERVICES - 106100 GEORGE LEECH L ASSOCIATES $188.81 SWITCH 2T ART S 1B6102 OIERLICH-MITCHELL. INC. $18.456.34 MECHANICAL PARTS - -'106303 4 GRAPHIC%CONTROLS.-- 5509.15 INSTHUMERC SUPPLIES Fl 106105 MACH COMPANY $34.19 LAB SUPPLIES -- fYl 106106 MARCO CORPORATION 16.371.29 MECHANICAL PARTS _ .106108 MICHAEL. HEINZ ' - 5271.8E MERIING A TRAINING ETFENSE �1 106109 HEWLETT PACKARD- COMPANY S300.00 `BLGIBTRA'fLOR. A CONPBESSOR PARTS 106111 HOUSE OF BATTERIES S56O.49 BATTERIES n ID6112 A.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. S1.724.82 HARDWARE _ -2q% 20 WATER owns LN 106114 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. $70.82 RBPUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT _— 106115 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $198.59 RUBBER STAMPS' 146117 IMPERIAL 'JEST CHEMICAL $81.791.73 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-08-89 106118 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $669.11 CONNECTORS 106120 INLAND EXPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $1.025.31 EQOIPEES RENTAL I . 106121 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 320.53 ' - 'UM USFAGE - u 136123 JENSEN TOOLS a ALLOYS S369.70 VACUUM BAGS 106124 JOYCE OFFICE PRODUCTS S406.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106126 KAMAN BEARINGS S SUPPLY 5428.85 PITTINGS - 106127 KANER COMPANY 91,680.35 SWLS/B6RWABB 106129 KAY-RAY. INC. $695.73 INSTBEffiR PARTS 106130 THE KEITH COMPANIES $1.237.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35636 106132 KING BEARING. INC. .S12.586.28 MECHANICAL PARTS 1 106133 KNO3 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES - $44.17 TOOLS J - m FUND AO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING RATE 4/04/90 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 f0 NTV QLNITATION Ml9TR7f TS OF 1@LNff f0 9TV CLAIMS. PAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE 04/11/90 106134 EASTMAN KODAK CO. $09.42 LAM SUPPLIES '106136 L.A. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS S155.19 FUND? PABTS^u J 106137 LA BUINTA MOTOR INN SZ12.37 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT • OVRRPAYINdii 106139 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $140.46 SAYETY SUPPLIES M.V. LAWHASTER L CO.. INC. 04,162.30 SOIL TESTING J 106142 LEARN KEY = $194.90 TRAINING MANUALS 'J 106143 LE ROY CRANDALL 0 ASSOC. $2.216.47 GE(DECHNICAL INSPECTION L., 1U6145 DAVID L. LOMAX EPDXY INJ. $6.750.00 SENIOR REAPIRS 106146 LOS ALAMITOS ECONO WASH $696.45 REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT LTwR 31 106190 ` NBC APPLIED ENVIR ONMENTAL 5910.00 OCBAH MNIITORINO 106149 MDS NUCLEAR INC.-. , $355.94 LAB SUPPLIES PM .Aline M91 19\9_i9 ' Pgll'IV ....TC SPVVTf.Qq ' 106151 MACOMCO' S197.26 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT X 106152 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. S589.52 POLYURETHANE 106154 MARSHALL MA1NT. PRODUCTIONS $55.00 TRAINING VIDEOS 106155 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S47.59 INSTBOIffiIT SUPPLIES 1 t6L\96 MA1F - fNIOq. TNf_ il.Tg9_T9 QIPPTRTf A TY9 'T 106157 MCKENNA ENGP. S EGUIP. S2.303.50 PACKING MATERIALS 'b> 106158 MCLEAN MIDWEST S1\548.8P AIR CONDITIONER WIl .OL159 YfN15TFq.fAgq SIIP PIY f0. i5L_TO MECHANICAL PARTS 6l, 206160 R.S. MEANS CO.. INC. $774.65 PUBLICATION 106161 THOMAS R. MELTON S153.26 MILEAGE 1 gAlL9 - NTf BDI Lr rn.PMTFq a95q.19 COMPUTER PARTS ,. 106163 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. $387.36 PIPE SUPPLIES 106164 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $909.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES P.' 10.11% NTTi MTSNT rON91MFR FL FrT ILO 9_AY REPRND 'USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _ L`~'J 106166 MONTEREY CARPETS '.$997.35 REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT WE'JI 1061 ST MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES' •TB.B90.00 LAS SERVICES .B616q 1'DNTREC SUPPLY rQ_ '%' iwc.oq - SMALL NARUWARK 106169 MOTTON SALT AND/OR S215.44 SALT 106170 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $64.31 MECHANICAL PARTS LA- SERVTcrs CELLULAR SERVICES NA 106172 TIONAL HEAT TREATING CO..INC 1220.22 REFUND USER PER OVERPATMENT 186173 NATIONAL PLANT "SERVICES. INC. $3.562.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE P�\ NATTONA MEMBERSHIP PEES C'• 116175 NEAL SUPPLY Co. 1813.24 FITTINGS .. N' 106176 NEVA PK ELE CTROMICS $213.28 INSTRUMENT PARTS q REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 106178 NORDSTROM $56.93 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT 106179 NORTHWEST MOTOR WELDING. INC. $9.500.00 MECHANICAL PARTS PI FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCCSSING DATE 9/U4/9^ PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 0n NT. Se .nnu n S.CIS nc nSANrF C^UAIiY 1i CL61MSPAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE 04/11/90 Nmae.T x _ Nrunnx AKANN+ nrS rSTxT ixx .�; 106180 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES. $9,059.37 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-4 R 106183 ORATHENGE OEM ART CORPBEARING. i24162.67 MISBM@7f YARtB. 106... Og4NGE EEApiNG. 'J NG. S162.6T BELTS..: 101CSURE" ""GCE` 811PF6LRB .. 106185 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 1137.99 TRUCK PASTS 106186 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. STB0.90 R8PON0 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT106188 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE 1251.27 NECEAEICAL PASTS I19 106289 OR AN BE YALYE 6 FI TYING CO. 9358.88 F13TINC6' 1I'10'I 106192 COUNTY OF ORANGE 32.953.0E DATA YHOCE39IWG SERPICES r 106192 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $13.228.98 REMORSE WORKER'S Cal@ INSURANCE 106194 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $859.35 MEET' 10,6195. PACIFIC PARTS 9114.55 u7!EEBISB Jul .nc.or erT c.P a EETI EQUIPME., r _ • {B•-1^ SAPRYILSBIYLLRS N"m 106197 PACIFIC BELL S2B.90 T8L8PBONC 8R010ES 106190 PACTEL CELLULAR $58.20 CELLULAR TELEPBONE SRBPICES "HI 106200 PATHFINDER INSTRUMENTS $267.35 ELECTRICAL PARTS. to 106201 PHOTO { SOUND CO. S125.00 REPAIRS -- 106203 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $141.91 PLASTICS n 106204 POLY PURE. INC. $19,657.19 POLYMERS H.O.B-9-B9.1-10-90 pnurg " "I N' 106206 POWER SPECIALISTS. INC. - $46.93 FREIGET 10620i. HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE . . $72.09 ICE i ncgnd Tnr oSn rCIS Sm . "08 rn_ 31 TYT_nn TU¢.e"vrmreeiON-INBPBLZ'lALN 0 8 '0 BB 106209 R.P.M. ELECTRIC MOTORG 14.877.38 ELECTRIC MOTOR 1°K 106210 P4INBOY DISPOSAL CO. SB56.99 TRASB fl8N0YA1 J 106212 ME01. EXPRESS $39.00 LAB SUPPLIERS 106213 THE REGISTER S1A95.60 ROIICBS S AGE 106215 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 62.433.78 INSTRUMERI' PARTS/FITTINGS 106216 RICHAROS. YATSON i GERSHON 110.13T.92 LEGAL 9ER910E8 6-11-86 nnp_ 10621S ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL S2.073.31 ELECIIIC SUPPLIES .. .� 106219 RDYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S692.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES. 1 n6�Pn lecrtrw. rru rnxo_ aTc9_an PsxmS nSean 106221 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS 81.100.56 ELECTRIC PART 106222 SEA COAST DESIGNS 44.519.67 OFFICE EQOIPMSNT L. REACH K. 106224 SEARS. ROEBUCM 6 CO. $369.95 TOOLS �10 l06225 SH AMROCN SUPPLY $1,600.79 EAROYARB 2 FUND NO 9199 • JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/04/91 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 BE ur.E E CLAIMS PAID 04/21/90 POSTING DATE .4/11190 . vrunn. ^T OF Tf^IpJ.nu n uA146226u^ SILVER .SPRINGS PATER a^$3.131.66 REPOND USER 7E8 OVEBPAT!¢NT - i3165 b 106228 ,SMITH-EMERT CO. $599.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 106229 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $289.00 APPLICATION FEES lui -_..Gai0N 3 — 106231 10. COAST AIR OUALITV $1,950.40 APPLICATION PEES 106232 S0. COAST AIR BUALI TT 5225.OP PUBLICATIONS 1D11`t °^U ULJ A' DODfE '�• L^_.-_.- SX— AARTS 106234 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $6.794.36 POWER 106235 SO. CALIF. EDISON CO. S6.723.00 POWER POLE RELOCATION 106237 WESTALLOI' INC. f1.648.74 TOOLS/WELDING SUPPLIES 106238 SPEEDE SPEEDOMETER ST5.74 DRIVER METING T— —S y 106240 PARK H. STEINYAMDER $116.88 BACKUP CLAIM - '.^JI 106241 STERLING ART ' 936.72 GILPSIC SUPPLIES �—�A2— NIRTICRARRif FEP91GE6 INS306243 SUMMIT STEEL f2.387.27 3TE¢L 106244 SUPELCO. INC. f218.26 LAB SUPPLIES OAPLT85 to 10624 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. s12916. TOOLS e � � 106248T TA.. .4- MA GOON )OBI LHOME PERK 9106.72 B ..72 REVISED USER PEE OVERPAYMENT T^UfZ AASTB ^� 106249 IMGRPE INSULATION f90.05 BUILDING MATERIAL .�n 106250 TIME MOTION TOOLS f3S.51 SMALL TOOLS .^"'• •^MTIY.LOC. B .... ......0 ft16 i0 SOFT LOW 106252 TOTAL PREVENTIONSYSTEMS $464.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-27-1 . 206253 .14.0. TRERICE-006 $906.28 ELECTRIC PARTS 206255 J.G. TUCKER 6 SON, INC. S512.48 INSTR@®1T PART ' 206256 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $3.813.60 SOIL TESTING M.0.644-69 --_ INSTRUMENT REPAIR ff 106258 UNOCAL S240.61 UNLEADED GASOLINE 106259 UNITED ELECTRIC SUPPLY f39.14 BLEC121M SUPPLIES I..... ERVA -- l06261 UPJOHN HEALTHCARE SERVICES $125.00 CPR TRAINING I OE 262 VMS (VISUAL "GMT. SYSTEMS) $5.664.85 INSTRUMENT G85I... - 106264 VWR SCIENTIFIC $6.436.73 LAB SUPPLIES ­ 106265 VACATIONLAND - $2.566.46 REFUND USER.PER OVERPAYMENT ,d 106267 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP 164.124.31 INSTRDffiMT PARTS 306268 VERTEX SYSTEMS f5.235.00 CD@U¢ER DATA SUPPORT 1062 TO Vol TE%R.INDUSTRIES.. S995.00 DOOR REPAIR 106271 JOIN MAPLES $533.52 DOOR CONTROL CONSULTANT (. .FUND NO 9199 - JT LIST YOPNING CAPITAL FPOCESSING HATE 9/40/9; PAGE 7 NUM REPORT NUMBER Ip43 COUNTY SANIT Tll .— CLAIMS cA10 04/31/90 POSTING DATE o4/l u9/11/90 106272 CARL YARREN 6 CO. $426.86 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR GI ;1 116274 YESTERN PACIFIC. EDNIPMENT CO. $761.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL �. 1G6275 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL-SUPPLY ► a'B57.84 GUSTIC SODA H.0.9-9-89 •4.." Yi661h JIRDi Ei-.T^"• NO 98 PN86ifAiiOU 106277 XEROX CORP. $7.674:22 COPIER LEASES 1P6278 GEORGE YAROLET ASSOCIATES .56 A.57 VALVE eIjUIP1®IT R810T"• 106280 EVERETT H. YORE CO. 1197.10 CNOINS PARTS v 106201 RICHARD YOUNG PROD $534.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106283 BRINDER90N CORP. $225,000.00 CONSTRUCTION 3-19-2 1UTAL CLAIMS PAID. - { 2,923,910.90 SUMMARY AMOUNT OI GREG. FUND { iiP nn /2 OPER PU1G1 5,128.00 xW 12.CAP PAILITORRY, - 2,962.58 OPER HIND - - n Rif 01 r 03 CAP PAC FOND 626.50 �^D /5 GREG FUND 735.57 CAP PAC FORD % mi_fn OPER FORD 226.00 /6 CAP FAC FUND 4.71 w 07 CAP PAC FUND 3.229.94 _ ill OPER FUND 4,319.12 013 OPER FUND /14 OPER ROSS 20.53 A. 114 CAP In FUm 5.386.40 0546 CAP E&C am 14 gag So 0667 OPSR FUND 2.274.67' _ 07414 OPER FUND 2.035.92 ]T OPER FUND SRI 9A0.79 u COBP 2,044,463.55 SBLF FUNDED NORR6RR CO11Y INSURANCE FUND 13.922.72 w JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FOND all AAA.7A _ w { 2.923.910.90 NA a� FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19/90 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I•I WARRANT N0. VENDOR - AMOUNT OESCRIP71ON N 106297 ACCESS ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS $438.25 LAB SUPPLIES 106298 GEORGE ADAMS JR• $7,844.25 Bil PANORAMA FBIM AGREEMENT b • EQUIP n 306300 STASIA ALLEN . $N.26 MILEAGE EXPENSE n 1013011 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE i1i293.32 AUTONDBILE LEASES H. SUPPLIES H 106503 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $1.752.62 Ill Fi7 106304 AMERITECH $97.75 COPIER LEASE lialHER HFAXWDIST . 106306 APCO VALVE A PRIMER CORP SIS0.08 VALVE . 106307 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.115.55 NOTICES 6 ADS • Y SEll 106309 ARATEM SERVICES, INC. $3.943.35 UNIFORM RENTALS 106310 ARNEL DEVELOPMENT CO. $535.27 REFUND PLAN CRECK OVER DEPOSIT .. U 106319 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING 316D.00 SOIL TESTING 306313 AREA - CORP. OF COASTAL AGENCY $350.90 REGISTRATIOM - —1E6'31T�FA'ECO U1 bPU.AL_E1AY`rCE­_ 41Z9.11t).4. GRIT REMOVAL H.O.7-13-88 Irri= 106315 P.Y. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. S5.58C.3C CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-34-142.P2-37 r 106316 0. BATEMAN $595.00 USHERED COIN DISTRIBUTION D OS REPOND . I" 106318 BANTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS S2.602.16 LAX SUPPLIES . 106319 HOWARD BLEVINS S200.00 REVIEWED COMP DISTRIBUTION til ---1V63Z0— 4SCAUL url Ym ODUG'b s52C.55 0 UPPLIES L"O 106321 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $143.13 RADIATOR REPAIR 106322 BON-A-RUES 1126.26 TRDCH PARTS EtWTXl • 01 ES NG S8 VIC - W�I 206324 BRAGG CRANE 6 RIGGING CO. f762.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 106325 BRIM - MAR 1 $1,225.54 REPIMD PLAN CEHCH OVER DEPOSIT YE32L—�EMeFRT-EA0R1525O.UO DEPOSITFUND _ ��.... 106327 BROWN L CALDWELL CONSULTING $3.273.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 89-45 i 186328 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $1.498.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ♦ I - 106330 GARY G. STREED 22.464.35 PETTY CASE REIMMURSEXIMT pppyyy 106332 BY-PRODUCTS MANAGEMENT, INC. $30.419.24 FERROUS CHLORIDE M.O.4-12-89 —�06732 CPTCON1r. TFS000TT r - SERVICE AGREEMENT 106333 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. $1.111.02 LAB SUPPLIES w 106334 CALTROL . INC. 43.154.61 REGULATOR PARTS w 105335— CA 06336 CAROLLO-BOYLErA JOINT VENTURE 91.710.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9 +_.106337 JOHN CAROELO ENGINEERS $34.666.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-15 10TRUCK FIR75- 6339 JOHN CASON 33.687.50 MECHANICAL PARTS 106340 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEP $6.357.13 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 15700 SDHSCR7PTTON - 0 106342 CENTURY PAINT $781.28 PAINT SUPPLIES m: 1 L FUND NO 9199 - JV GIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE //19/9U PAGE P ` REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID d4125199 POST I illf—D-AfF647F97 90 M� WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106343 CHALLENGE BEARING $ IND. SFLY $63.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES - w 106344 PENNY CHARTIER $250.00 _ DEPOSIT REFUND - 166345 CHEVRON .S.A.. INC. $11• 2.93 UNISJUDED GASOLINR 106346 WILLIAM N. CLARKE 2610.54 DETERRED COMP PAID" 106347 C.E.E.S. . CO. . INC. 41.941.00 MECEUKICAL.PARTS APRLSS.K COMP NEWTS OF C&LIFS26. T4.k9 PUMP PARTS 106319 COMPUTER OATACON $922:21 PRINTER MASONS 116350 COMPUSERVE $215E COMPUTER SERVICES 31�"L f 4.73--- TRO PARTS 106352 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST. $7,041.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES - 106353 CONTAINERIZED CHEMICAL OISPOSA $975.00 TDRIC WASIB DISPOSAL 10, LUM14MLOIAL UKAPHIC3 �TTE6.P1— BLURPRINTING M.O. -12-89 Ian 186355 CONTROL CABLES. INC. $44.16 Mum PARTS M+� 106356 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. $128.0$3.02 ENGINES M.O. 5-13-67.6-8-89, J-19A 1.4 ♦ �9- CEP TS 106358 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $944.67 EECMC SUPPLIES - vr 106359 CHEMPRO ENVIRONNENTAL SERVICES 21.253.98 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CAL WATER3 6. S- EQUIPl03f1' RENTAL n ITl 106361 LARRY CURTI TRUCK 6 EQUIPMENT 925,080.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.4-13-88 X 106362 STATE OF CALIF. DEPT. OF BEN. S99.01 PUBLICATION PRE m�I56363— STATE-OF-C7LIFDRATr--- �$16�.D SB PROCESS NC lam,, STATE OF CALIFORNIA $160.00 SBE PROCESSING FEE 186365 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $255.11 DIESEL USE TAE u.. CALIFORNIA $160.00 SAS PROCESSING PEE .a 106367 DAILY PILOT l40.50 NOTICES 6 ADS 106368 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 12♦041.92 TIM DiWITCOIR IROCI 50. ONTRACI SERVICE e 106370 DESKTOP GRAPHICS UN DESIGN $36.00 GRAPHICS SUPPLIES 106371 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 1573.74 OUTSIDE PAINTING ♦ SPACE RENTAL - w. 106373 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. f702.68 PAINT SUPPLIES _ 106374 D•VALS SALES $357.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 1 - TDD7B8 -- 106376 ERA SERVICES. INC. A20.637.97 CONSULTING SERVICES PZ-44 146377 - ENSECO-CRL $3.700.00 - OCEAN SAMPLING �U6LAbIRAMS G •106379 ECOANALYSIS. INC. $2♦414.17 OCEAN MONITORING 166380 ECOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING S AAALY 97.750.00 OCEAN RESEARCH o ET.TSERV7LE-L . PUMP PARTS — 106382 ENYIR ONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $459.00 LAB SAMPLES .N 196383 MARSHALL FAIRRES $350.50 DETERRED C01U DISTRIBUTION �35STU"LC` _---CON TROCTI0R_3[ - - , J-ZU -_ 106395 FARR SALES L SERVICE $2.332.99 -- FILTERS _ w, 106386 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP. $293.00 AIR MIGHT n _4 106380 FICO•S APPLIANCE SERVICE $207.12 VACUUM BELT v w FUND NO 9199 - OT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19/9U PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER APO] COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106389 MICHAEL J.. FILECCIA $162.63 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 106390 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO. $2.466.97 PLOY METER I0G 106392 FLO-SYSTEMS - 98.444.55 PUMP PARTS 1 106393 FLUID COMPONENTS♦ INC. $9.742.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS ire 106395 CLIFFORD A. FORKERT 5669.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 106396 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $364.7( FILM J r.l 106398 FOX ENTERPRISES $1,825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 106399 FOXBORO CO. / HAS SYSTEMS $64.01 MACHINE PART p.. DEFERRED COW PAYOFF 106401 FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS $299.75 TRUCK PARTS 106402 A.F. FREY i105.0U DEFERRED C0W DISTRIBUTION 9x 306404 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $3.031.36 LONGER 106405 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS iS♦418.75 FIBERGLASS won i9 di00 0LN[RM1 MOLT PARTS S SCRO COR 562.20 S7[FEIY SOPPLIPS iv� rn 106407 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6.553.37 TELEPHONE r. X 106408 GERHARDT•Sr INC. 2561.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS IDS" W 106110 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION 51.208.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 106411 DON GREEN S ASSOCIATES $4.507.50 SURVEYING SERVICES US 88-72 I No .. q.R. EDNPtlTE 186413 HACH COMPANY $151.50 LAB SUPPLIES w. CORP. 490400 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIR bU 206414 FRED 4. HARPER . 31.495.03 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 106416 HATCH S KIRK. INC. $1,844.91 MECHANICAL PARTS u 106417 HATFIELD DEVELOPMENT CO 21.667.92 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT . lief 106419 MYLES S. HIGASHIMURA 54.59 MILEAGE EXPENSE 10642D HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRIC 5700.00 ELECTRIC PARTS file. IMD PARSur MTSi-1NC -- 1225.. b=U. - 106422 MOERBIGER C.V.M. CALIF. ♦ INC. 0 . COMPRESSOR PARTS D 40 106923 0N NALD ALD D. MONOMICHL $3 f300.00 DEFBBAlU CORM DISTRIBUTION 18 106425 HORIZON HIGH-REACH $63.95 TRUCK PARTS 106426 P.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. f240.59 PAINT SUPPLIES 106428 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $211.56 RUBBER STAMPS p. 106429 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHYINN CYCL $201.84 BICYCLE PARTS L' 06 106431 ENERGY SERVICES GROUP $129.87 ENGINE PARTS IC6432 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 575.299.70 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-08-89 '10 306439 1Ni]LCO DE GR CMONT♦ INC. f47.897.00 BOB SCREAMS SPEC 8-I18 1 FUND 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19196 PAGE 4 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 It�I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY n WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106435 INGRAM PAPER f2.03J.18 JUKITOR SUPPLIES 106436 THE IRVINE CO. $3.974.41 REPOIm PLAtl CBECR OYBfl DBPOSIi 106938 GREAT WESTERN 'SANITARY SUPP• $604.71 JANITORIAL.SUPPLIES i. 106439 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY . .: $549.98. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES IOG 90�DIEF-.11111 1...UCIS bzr.vq --DPFTCE..DP PCf13 U 106441 KALLEENrS COMPUTER SUPPLIES 5725.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106442 KAMAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY $36.54 BEARINGS 0 U 106444 MANL EE COMPANY $552.21 PAINT 106995 FLEET EQUIPMENT CORP. S19r650.95 ELECTRIC CARTS 4'u_I06990 I— ... E I FUO700015 ZAP SAFEfY SHOES 106447 KAY-RAY. INC. f854:Be INSTBRIEST PARTS r 106448 KEITH-STEVENS. INC. $3.077.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES r 101150 DONALD E. KINNEY 6146.97 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 206451 - KNOT INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES f150.47 GAUGE I0N052 IML-KULL 6U 999;17 REF09HRTJlN L7BG7'-008R OEPOSEI FIT MARTIN NORDICK. SP f2.136.3L CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-LB T106154 KORNLAND BUILDING $837.556 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT ..�.�.ii 106456 LEIGHTON 6 ASSOC. $9.271.61 LAB SERVICES 1� 106457 LE ROY CRANDALL 8 ASSOC. $3.632.59 GEOTECHNICA, SERVICES - —I0697R LIES RI CDRP9...'ON ...l y O"0l'�NIHpE[ODILE'X•10;FF�p1 _. J 106459 LIMITORBUE CORP. f6.E60.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES y bD 106460 N.P. LINDSTROM. INC. 34.486.23 CONSULTING SERVICES - MASTER PLAK • . I A r Di ViTy-ptaw PAR 'r., 106462 LOCAL AGENCY 61.500.On LAM FEE ' �e 106463 LOCAL AGENCY 9750.00 LASED FEE I ON 959 COElIrC6El1 CIZou.utLA,P.LU FEE 1 106465 MPS $44.41 - PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES nr 306966 MAJOR LOCK SUPPLY $389.50 SAPOTY SUPPLIES - 106460 MARSHALL MAINT. PRODUCTIONS f191.04 INSTRUCIIOHAL VIDBDS mi 106169. MARVAC .ELECTRONICS S31.22 INSTBUlLL�Nf SW PLIES w. 1 106471 MCKENNA ENGR. 6 EQUIP. $2.004.93 PRBICNT -_ 106472 MCMASTER-CARE SUPPLY CO. 31.413.64 HARI)MARE ION 74 MOTION INDUSTRIES♦ INC. S203.48 1@CHANICA6 PARTS 1ON 75 MOTOROLA. INC. $669.38 PAGERS i0647G NOTOPOCR CELLULAR 5EKY10E5 S90 OJ --yECLOLAE T6'CEFH00E SEF.OI LES 106477 NATIONAL LUMBER S554.84 HARDWARE/LIIl1BER n 1ON78 NA71ONAL PLANT SERVICES, INC. SI.000.00 GENERAL INSPECTION w 106480 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $9.700.63 PANELING w NH ti w. J FUND NO 91-9 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/1919C PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY M� CUITMS 7TIO-DA72579T-7ffM RG1EA7E-N -WARRANT NO. - VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 196481, NEAL SUPPLY CO. 581.60 HARDWARE - LI 106402 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH A4.O, WATER USEAGE LOS083 UHAKLL4 MIGROLS. --__— MEETING ESPENSN,.. 106484 ERIC MIEHUES S2.484.12 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 106485 N.C. NOTTINGHAM CO. INC. $690.00 COSSMMOR SERVIC08 PIPING 106487 O.M.S./SOLA6 DISPOSAL CO 53.872.OU TRASH BIN REMOVAL u4 106488 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 6295.94 SAPEIY CLASSES SUBSCRIPTION 106490 DR SYSTEMS CO. 528.379.17 CHLORINE M.O.2-16-90 106491 CYNTHIA OONE1L $38.40 MILEAGE MUSE TZUEV4 —�37T.89 MEETING F. USE 106493 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $295.55 FITTINGS 1 U6994 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY 5147.76 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES J 355.56 TRUCE PADS 106496 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE $450.00 ROAD STRIPING 106497 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $514.93 FITTINGS - III6A JH— .AT.Li LWV ♦5£5�35 SPECIALTY GASES E>C*n 106499 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4.875.01 WASTE HAULER GATE FEES >C ER 106500 RED COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $6.153.17 DEF COMP DISTRIBUTION �� fOTi:iDI- "➢'m" ANIMALIDM-U131KILI • . REIMBURSE WORKERS COP INSURANCE 106502 PC MAGAZINE 561.97 SUBSCRIPTION 106503 PSI $952.87 INSTRUMENT!REPAIR MECHANICAL PARTS 106505 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $3.666.10 SAFETY SUPPLIES ^I 106506 PACIFIC BELL $27.53 TELEPHONE NSULI - PUBLIC RELATIONS DIST 7 _ 106508 PARTS UNL IMTTED 51.624.70 TRUCK PARTS - 106509 ROY PENDERGRAFT $445.00 DEFERRED COP DISTRIBUTION PROJECTOR REPAIR 106511 PICKWICK PAPER $281.83 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 106512 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS• INC. 544039.10 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 - --lBS31TNCYuOWES _- ---.--P3T0E7&T- 106514 POLYPUFE. INC. 323.460.18 FILTMERS M.0.1-10.90.8-9-89 106515 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $982.76 ELRCCRIC SUPPLIES T - , 1106517 PROCESS EDUIPMENT COMPANY 31.316.P0 SEALS - 106518 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. 54.028.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0 8-10-88- 186520 R M CONTROLS $533.43 CHARTS 106521 R.P.M. ELECTRIC MOTORS 32.631.54 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS ------TO16522 .D3 REFUND PLAN CUM OVER DEPOSIT 106523 RECYC. INC. $86.640.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-80 206524 RED VALVE CO.. INC. $2,361.62 VALVE PARTS T431:09-'— SAPETY SIDE 106526 REPUBLIC ENGINES $146.25 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4119/90 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANSL COUNTY CCA7AT1+AIb-Di/25740—P"08TiNG-U7TE J972 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT_ DESCRIPTION �h 106527 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $916.95 ELECTRIC 90PLIES 106528 REMOLD POWER TRANSMISSION $94.32 1RCEANICAL PARTS 1. -1IISS19 �I i TgBB-6-OERS7IDR-- Sfi d• O"_6F_ LECAL SERVICES Y.0.6-11-86 Im E530 ROBERTS 6 SONS CONST. CO. 1484.91 REFUND PLAN CHEM OVER DEPOSIT - 106531 RODNEY-HUNT CO.. $687.44 GATE PARTS HOT" IKSIMUMENI 3YRHMENT PARTS 306533 RYAN"ERCO 2272.48 BARIUM 106539 S.R.F. MACHINERY ENG.. INC. S605.63 MECRANICAI PARTS • S Z ER 3732 BO —. P—M UM 106536 SAFFEL 6 MC ADAM $409.20 REFUND PLAN CHECK OUR DEPOSIT 106537 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT4L 928.432.39 DCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-14-89 P. 71EMT-00. �SOB�II-- �- BEZ'UNp LAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT l 06539 SRAMROCK SUPPLY SL U65.26 HARDWARE 306590 SNE'HER0 MACHINERY CO. f80.47 ENGINE PARTS .9 —S'1-.E6739-- - ENCI SERVICES 106542 SKYPARK HALMTIN MEDICAL CLINIC $940.00 PHYSICAL SEARS 106543 SMITH-EMERY CO. S2.967.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-14-89 ,H NEE ff -- i52B.PJ SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 '771 106545 SOUTH COAST DODGE S245.65 TRUCK PARTS 100 ". SOUTHERN ULIF..EO150N CO. $341.123.73 POWER — 33 • �A 106598 SOUTHERN PACIFIC iP pWATER. CO. s$47.25 MEMENT WATERlD071' 2-26 " 116549 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER • fN.23 DRINKING WATER ,M .• .T.�RSTR R 106551 STAMEN Z. SPASSDFF. P.E. $7.200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162.P1-20.P2-17 106552 YESTALL OY INC. 071 YELLING SUPPLIES 06554 STATER BROS. MARKETS • $6,695.67 REPDMD ?LAW CHEM OVER DEPOSIT R� 106555 STERLING ART $76.99 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF uw 106557 SUBI A. INC. S265.63 PRESENTATION AIDS - . 106558 SUNBELT LANDSCAPE S MAINT. 33.847.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING N.0.8-9-89 ..T-106 -TRD 106569 DUPELW INC. S833.09 LAB SUPPLIES aI 106561 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. S1.4S2.32 TOOLS 106563 TALIN TIRE. INC. • $250.84 TIMES 106564 TAYLOR-DUNN S799.22 TRUCK PARTS 29,5ST S3C6.J3----� 106566 TEKMAR COMPANY S932.71 LAB SUPPLIES 106567 THORPE INSULATION 5504.12 BOLDING MATERIALS M_ 6 .'BE_._._ Smw Sim 106569 TIME MOTION TOOLS S65.59 SM L TOOLS 106570 TINKER B RASOR S2.090.38 INSTRUMENT VEL_SER ICES T 106572 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY, INC. 1234.59 TRUCK PARTS h� FUND NO 9119 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4119/90 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 51 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ' 206573 J.G. TUCKER f SON. INC. $1.646.34 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 106574 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTER.INC. $577.16 GLASS - �+ 101176 THE UNISOURCE•CORP. $304.68 - OFFICE SXPPLIEB '- 106577 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $145.87 PARCEL SERVICES i - 106579 VYR SCIENTIFIC $3.322.11 LAG SUPPLIES 106580 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. S9;445.07 FITTINGS 1 • . S D6582 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP $323.09 LAX SUPPLIES .. 71 106583 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2.697.50 COMP= DATA SUPPORT - 106585 VILLAGE NURSERIES 5280.50 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES IGE586 PALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $319.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES - A pp. 106588 CARL WARREN f CO.� SSOV.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR - _. 106589 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 997.50 PUBLICATION -.IT1 ]06591 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS. INC. 6332,36 SAFETY SIGN r. X 106592 YC S TERN PACIFIC I UTPMENT CO. $1.439.66 RENTAL EQUIPMENT . - -ay ay 10659q YESTRUX INTERNATIONAL f1 d32.57 TRUCK PARTS 206595 ROURKE G WOODRUFF $39.877.00 LEGAL SERVICES N.0.6-4-89 I-- XEROX • IM,to 106597 RICHARD B. EDGAR - $TOG-=O- DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ------- 6 lea TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/25/90 S1.668.364.28 v� SUMMARY ANODN'T 01 i 135.72 vi fl 7,065.34 02 5,706.39 W 09 9.IRA-a. _ f5 5,748.40 - f5 1,791.34 96 wl f6 2.473.93 H 97 34.794.06. 07 47 qg 62 _ All 6,749.59 _ 014 28.456.16 A566 2J87.36 w KG6 271.45 1 f667 11.519.63 ""' f7614 I,690.44 JT OPER FUND 946,387.45 lug CORF 354,973.08 SELF FUNDED WORKERS CORE INSURANCE FUND 11.743.17 W� JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 186.375.5E f L6fi8.764.28 � . STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) Ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on 4? 19,& was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts - offices on �, 19�. n IN WI�T,NyE1,S�S` WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this C;� day of 19 pU . A7 w+V Rita J. Bro , Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 , 7 , 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California