HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-05-09 y'h1T,TIp4.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
y� 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
�lhce cao (714)962-2411
May 2, 1990
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 1990 - 7: 30 P,M,
10044 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos . 1 , 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14 of
Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and
date. c[�
SeCfetary
Tentatively-Scheduled Uocomina Meetings :
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 16th, at 5 : 30 p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE & - Wednesday, May 23rd, at 5 : 30 p.m.
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
JOINT WORKS SELECTION - Wednesday, May 23rd, at 7 : 30 p.m.
COMMITTEE (immediately following the Executive
Committee meeting)
CONSERVATION, - Thursday, May 31st, at 5 : 30 p.m.
RECLAMATION AND
REUSE COMMITTEE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
d ORANGE COUNTY,CAIIEORNIA
'p ELL.B.rE
V O BOX 0127
I Tux VALLEY.CUO A Bza
musu.zan
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings
May May 09, 1990 May 23, 1990
June Jun 13, 1990 Jun 27, 1990
July Jul 11, 1990 Jul 2S, 1990
August Aug 08, 1990 None Scheduled
September Sep 12, 1990 Sep 26, 1990
October Oct 10, 1990 Oct 24, 1990
November Nov 14, 1990 None Scheduled
December Dec 12, 1990 None Scheduled
January Jan 09, 1991 Jan 23, 1991
February Feb 13, 1991 Feb 27, 1991
March Mar 13, 1991 Mar 27, 1991
April Apr 10, 1991 Apr 24, 1991
May May 08, 1991 May 29, 1991
K
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation DlsMch P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County,Calnomia Fountain volley,CA 9272E-8127
Telephone:(714)962.2411
JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 9, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government
Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written
materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is
proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or
action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or
as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts
of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if
any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(4) EACH DISTRICT
Annuua el—ection of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tern of the
Boards:
(a) District 1
(b) District 2
(c) District 3
(d) District 5
(a) District 6
(f) District 7
(g) District 11
(h) District 13
(i) District 14
(5) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(6) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards
on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
5/09/90 '
(7) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel
present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general
interest to the Directors. These reports are for —
information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chairman
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
(8) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: IT no corrections or amendments are made, the
following minutes will be deemed approved as
mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman:
District 1 - April 11, 1990 regular
District 2 - April 11, 1990 regular, and
April 18, 1990 adjourned
District 3 - April 11, 1990 regular
District 5 - April 11, 1990 regular
District 6 - April 11, 1990 regular
District 7 - April 11, 1990 regular
District 11 - April 11, 1990 regular
District 13 - April 11, 1990 regular
District 14 - April 11, 1990 regular
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Con8lderaf-io-n of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of
claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows:
(Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will
be regarded as the same for each District represented unless
a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any
District. ) See pages "A" -and B.
4/11/90 4/25/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Jo�ating Fund - $ 564,949.79 $ 946,387.45
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 2,044,463.55 354,973.08
Joint Working Capital Fund - 212,846.74 186,375.58
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 13,922.72 11,743.17
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 338.00 135.72
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 8,090.58 12,771.73
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 18,459.41 3,384.51
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 5,808.77 7,539.74
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 230.71 9,197.99
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 16,126.40 82,380.68
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 4,319.12 6,749.59
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 38.00 -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 5,406.93 28,456.16
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 6 6 JOINT - 24,599.59 3,058.83 --�
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 2,274.67 11,519.6�'.
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 2,035.92 3,690.44
$2,923,910.90 $1,660,364.28
-2-
5/09/90
(10) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 10(a) THROUGH 10(n)
All matters placed on the consent calendar are
considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is
requested to be removed from the consent calendar by
a Director, staff member, or member of the public in
attendance, there will be no separate discussion of
these items. All items on the consent calendar will
be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included
on the consent calendar. All items removed from the
consent calendar shall be considered in the regular
order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item
from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by
the chair, state their name, address and designate
by letter the item to be removed from the consent
calendar.
The Chairman will determine if any items are to be
deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items
appearing on the consent calendar not specifically
removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding
purchase order contract for video Inspection
Services for Districts' Sewers and Manholes,
specification No. 5-045, to PSS, Inc. , in an
amount not to exceed $164,786 .00 for a two-year
period beginning May 15, 1990. See page "C"
(b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Primary
Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33,
authorizing an addition of $21, 371 .00 to the
contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co.
for three items of additional work. See page
'D"
(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 3 to the plans and specifications for
Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and 8 at
Reclamation Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-35-1 ,
authorizing an addition of $92,392.00 to the
contract with S. A. Healy Co. & Assoc. for seven
items of additional work, and granting a time
extension of 60 calendar days for completion of
`.,►� said additional work. See page "E"
-3-
5/09/90
(10) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(d) Consideration of the following actions relative
-
to Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17:
(1 ) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee certification
of the final negotiated fee for said
additional services. See page "F"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-41,
approving said Addendum No. 2 to the
Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation,
for said additional services on an
hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead,
for an additional amount not to exceed
$6,438.00 for wage escalations due to delays
in the project, plus construction management/
inspection services at the rate of $80.00 per
hour, including overhead and profit, for a
total amount not to exceed $156,160.00,
increasing the total authorized compensation
from $329,105.00 to an amount not to exceed
$491,703.00. See page "G"
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-42, approving
Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for technical
and environmental support services relative to the
1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan Environmental Impact Report and Ocean
Discharge Permit renewal application, providing
for a reallocation of the costs among categories
within said agreement, with no change in the
maximum authorized compensation of $304,000.00.
See page "H"
(f) Consideration of motion authorizing the General
Manager to issue a purchase order to Southern
California Edison Company in the amount of
$69,499.00 and execute necessary documents, in
form approved by the General Counsel, for
installation of added underground facilities to
provide for a 4,000 kw, standby electrical power
service for Plant No. 1 .
(g) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue
a purchase order to Solar Turbines, Inc. in an
amount not to exceed $45,000.00 plus sales tax for
Repairs to Solar Energy Generator No. 2 at Plant
No. 1 (Specification No. R-036 ) .
-4-
5/09/90
(10) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(h) Consideration of motion amending the Boards,
action of April 11, 1990, revoking authorization
for staff to issue a purchase order to Michael
Chevrolet in the amount of $86,535.00 plus tax for
the purchase of nine Chevrolet S10 pick-up trucks
(Specification No. A-150-2) ; and authorizing staff
to issue a purchase order to Folsom Lake Ford in
the amount of $84,331.89 plus tax and delivery
charges for purchase of nine Ford Ranger pick-up
trucks (Specification No. A-150-2) , in accordance
with the terms and conditions of the Cooperative
Procurement Program of the State of California and
State of California Contract No. 1-90-23-20
(1) Consideration of motion denying Application for
Permission to Present Late Claim for personal
injuries filed by Leatrice L. Cohen, attorney for
claimant Lynn Redman. See page "I"
DISTRICT 2
(j ) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Portion
of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger
Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2,
and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract
No. 2-27, authorizing an addition of $77,778.00
to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp. for six
items of additional work and granting a time
extension of 14 calendar days for completion of
said additional work. See page "J"
(k) Consideration of motion authorizing the General
Manager to issue a purchase order to Southern
California Gas Company in an amount not to exceed
$70,000.00 and to execute necessary documents, in
form approved by the General Counsel, for
relocation of approximately 1,400 feet of 4-inch
diameter gas main required in connection with
construction of the Katella Relief Sewer, between
Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-28.
DISTRICTS 5 6 6
(1) Consideration of the following actions relative
to Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between
32nd Street and Coronado Street, Contract
No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast
Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2:
[ITEM (10) (1) CONTINUED ON PAGE 61
-5-
5/09/90 '
(10) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(1) (Continued from page 5) :
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications
for said project, authorizing an addition of
$1,305.00 to the contract with National
Plant Services, Inc. for additional video
inspection services, and granting a time
extension of 60 calendar days for delay in
starting the project to allow the contractor
to complete emergency repair work to sewers
in San Francisco damaged by the October 1990
earthquake. See page "R"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-50,
accepting said project as complete,
authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion and approving the Final Closeout
Agreement. See page "L"
DISTRICT 7
(m) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-51-7, ordering
annexation of 2.47 acres of territory to the
District in the vicinity of Amapola Avenue and
Orange Park Boulevard in unincorporated County
territory (Annexation No. 129 - Garrett
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7)
See page "M"
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-52-7 ,
approving Reimbursement Agreement with George
Adams, Jr. , providing for reimbursement to
Mr. Adams by the District of a proportional share
of his cost of constructing a sewer line in Baja
Panorama Street, to be collected from the owners
of Lots 7 and 9 of Tract No. 939 upon connection
to the sewer. See page "N"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Cons�n of action on items deleted from Consent
Calendar, if any
-6-
5/09/90
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of
motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's
V written report of the meeting on April 25, 1990 (Copy
enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(b) Consideration of action on the following items
recommended by the Executive Committee:
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-43, establishing
policies and procedures for the selection and
procurement of professional engineering,
architectural, environmental, land surveying and
construction management services.
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue
a purchase order to F. E. Carleton in an amount not
to exceed $50,000.00 for professional consulting
services, on an as-needed basis, at the rate of
$95 .00 per hour, for a two-year period beginning
May 10, 1990, to assist the Districts in obtaining
permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) for current and future projects
at both treatment plants, and for assistance
relative to other SCAQMD issues.
(13 ) DISTRICTS 1,2, 3 ,5,6,7,11 a 13
(a) verbal staff report on Long-range Financial Plan Update
and 1990-91 Sewer Connection and Use Fee Recommendations
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report
dated April 25, 1990 re Long-range Financial Plan Update
and 1990-91 Sewer Connection and Use Fee Recommendations
(Previously mailed to Directors under separate cover) .
(14) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 ,7,11 6 13
(a) Public hearing relative to the following proposed
Ordinances of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 , 7, 11 and 13 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinances
Establishing wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities: See page "O"
Amending Repealing
District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No.
1 115 113 114
2 211 208 209
3 313 311 312
5 522 520 521
6 616 614 615
7 724 722 723
11 1112 1110 1111
13 1307 1305 1306
[ITEM ( 14) CONTINUED ON PAGE 8]
_7_
5/09/90
(14) DISTRICTS 1,2, 3,5,6,7,11 6 13 (Continued from page 7)
(a) Public hearing: '
( 1) Open hearing
( 2) verbal Report of General Counsel
( 3 ) Receive and file written comments, if any
(4) Oral public comments, if any
(5) Staff response to comments
(6) Close hearing
(b) DISTRICT 1
Cons ration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California, Amending ordinance No. 113
Establishing wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 114:
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 115
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 115 .
(c) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 208
Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 209:
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 211
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
ordinance No. 211.
[ITEM (14) CONTINUED ON PAGE 9]
-8-
5/09/90
(14) (d) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board
`./ of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 311
Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 312:
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 313
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 313.
(a) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 520
Establishing wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 521:
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 522
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 522.
(f) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 614
Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 615:
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 616
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 616.
(ITEM (14) CONTINUED ON PAGE 10]
V�
-9-
5/09/99
(14) (g) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of the following actions relative to --
proposed Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 722
Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 723 :
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 724
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 724.
(h) DISTRICT 11
Considers ion of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110
Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 1111 :
(1 ) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1112
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 1112.
( i) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305
Establishing wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 1306 :
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1307
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 1307 .
-10-
5/09/90
(15) DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 6 13
(a) Public hearing relative to the following proposed
Ordinances of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 0£
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinances
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
See page P.
Amending Repealing
District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No.
1 116 109 112
3 314 309 N/A
5 523 516 519
6 617 609 611 6 613
11 1113 1108 1109
13 1308 1303 N/A
(1) Open hearing
(2) verbal Report of General Counsel
( 3) Receive and file written comments, if any
(4) Oral public comments, if any
(5) Staff response to comments
(6) Close hearing
(b) DISTRICT 1
Consiceration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 112:
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 116
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 116.
(c) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 314
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 314.
(ITEM ( 15) CONTINUED ON PAGE 121
-11-
5/09/0'
(15) (d) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 519 :
(1 ) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 523
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 523.
(e) DISTRICT 6
Consi eration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613;
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 617
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 617.
(f) DISTRICT 11
Conga ion of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 1109 :
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1113
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 1113 .
[ITEM (15) CONTINUED ON PAGE 13]
las/
-12-
5/09/90
(15) (g) DISTRICT 13
Cons�ion of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1308
by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of
Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 1308.
(16) DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13
Consideration of t e o lowing resolutions directing the
County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges
on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinances of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 of Orange
County, commencing with the 1990-91 fiscal year: See page
District Resolution No. Ordinance No.
1 90-44-1 116
3 90-45-3 314
5 90-46-5 523
6 90-47-6 617
11 90-48-11 1113
13 90-49-13 1308
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Closed Session: During the course of conducting the
business on this agenda as a regular
meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the
Boards in closed session to consider matters of
pending or potential litigation, or personnel
matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9
or 54957.6.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real
property; (b) matters of pending or potential
litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are
exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards
during a permitted closed session and are not
available for public inspection. At such time as
final actions are taken by the Directors on any of
these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session
(c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered
in closed session.
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
-13-
5/09/90'
(19 ) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 20) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(21 ) DISTRICT 2
0 E eeriness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(23) DISTRICT 5
Ot— e� u-siness and communications or supplemental agenda
Items, if any
( 24) DISTRICT 5
Consiration of motion to adjourn
(25 ) DISTRICT 6
Ot er asiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(26 ) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(27) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 7
Con— s�tion of motion to adjourn
(29 ) DISTRICT 13
Other mess and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 30) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
( 31 ) DISTRICT 14
OtHe-r mess and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 32) DISTRICT 14
Consi eration of motion to adjourn
( 33 ) DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Consideration of the following actions relative to the
financing, design, construction, capacity ownership and
operation of certain master-planned sewage collection
facilities for serving Districts 3 and 11 :
(a) verbal staff report --
[ITEM (33 ) CONTINUED ON PAGE 15]
-14-
5/09/90
( 33) DISTRICTS 3 9 11 (Continued from page 14)
(b) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve
staff Report dated May 1, 1990. See page "R"
(c) Consideration of motion to receive, file, approve and
adopt the Project Report relative to Slater Avenue Pump
Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17,
dated April 3, 1990, prepared by John Carollo Engineers
(Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-53, approving
Agreement between County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 3 and 11 providing for financing, design,
construction, capacity ownership and operation of
certain master-planned sewage collection facilities
for serving Districts 3 and 11. See page .'S"
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff and General
Counsel to negotiate with General Telephone and
Electronics (GTE) to secure a site adjacent to the
existing Slater Avenue Pump Station for construction
of the new pump station, providing for the exchange
of the existing, smaller site for the new site, upon
abandonment of the existing pump station; authorizing
the General Manager to execute the necessary documents
to effect such exchange, in form approved by the General
Counsel; and authorizing payment to GTE in an amount not
to exceed $25,000.00 for said exchange.
( 34) DISTRICT 3
O her usiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 35) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(36 ) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(37 ) DISTRICT 11
Condon of motion to adjourn
-15-
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain Volley.CA 9 2 72 8-81 2 7
Telephone: (714)962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
Meeting Date
May 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m.
The following is a brief explanation of the more inportant, non-routine
items which appear an the enclosed agenda and which are nat otherwise
self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material
surmmrizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
4: AMML ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND CHAIM�N PRO TEM OF EACH DISTRICr'S
BOARD.
In accordance with the Districts' rules of procedure (see following
excerpt), a Chairman and Chairten pro tem for each District Board is elected
annually at the May meeting.
Excerpt from Rules of Procedure for Meetings
"7. Chaimran of the District - A Cbairmn (and Chairnran pro tem) shall be
elected by majority vote as the first order of business by the
marl a of each District's Board of Directors at the first meeting in
May of each year, and said Chairrrun (and Chhairrran pro tem) shall
serve at the pleasure of the majority of said members."
For the infornlation of the new Directors, the Districts' regulations
provide that each Chai*rnan autorati.cally becomes a Barber of the Executive
Cmsrrittee, which ordinarily meets rmnthly at the call of the Joint Chairrrnn-
This Committee also includes the Joint CJ>�, Vice Joint Ch=rman and the
representatives of the County Board of Supervisors. The Executive Committee's
function is to study and nuke reasrmwviations to the Joint Boards concerning
major issues and policy matters.
-1-
May 9, 1990
The current Chairman and Chaim pro tem are as follows:
District No. Chairman chairman pro tem
1 Dan Griset Richard Edgar
2 Roland Bigonger James Neal
3 Richard Polis Caney Nelson
5 Evelyn Bart Phil Sansone
6 James Wahner Ruthelyn Plummer
7 Don Smith Richard Edgar
11 Tom Mays Grace Winchell
13 Reny Wedaa Iry Pickler
14 Peer Swan (vacant)
Nominations for Joint Chairman are made at the regular June meeting and
the election takes place at the July regular meeting. Naninations and election
of the Vice Joint Chairman are conducted at the July regular meeting.
10(a) : AWARD PUFJMVSE ORDER CONIRWr FOR AS-NEEDED VIDEO INSPEMON SE[iVICES
FOR DISTRICIS TRDNR SEWERS AND MA4UZES, SPECIFICATION NO. S-045.
From time to time, the Districts engage contractors to conduct video
inspections of sewers and manholes to determine their condition. Often, the
inspections are of an urgency or emergency nature. In the past bids have been
solicited each time services were required. Staff believes that a long-term
contract with a firm specializing in this type of work would reduce total costs
and has, therefore, solicited bids for a two-year contract.
Three bids were received for video inspection services, ranging from a
high of $121,917.00 per year to a low of $79,893.00 per year. The amounts are
bassi on a unit cost bid for sewer footage and pipe size plus miscellaneous
specified charges, and an estimated annual rwg,;rament to T.V. appradmately 25
miles of sewers. (The Districts presently operate over 800 miles of trunk
sewers and 1,000 miles of local sewers.)
It is recommended that award be made to P.S.S. Inc., the lowest bidder,
for a two-year contract for Video Inspection Services for Districts Trunk Sewers
and Manholes, Specification No. S-045. The two-year contract period is
estimated to cost a maximum of $164,786.00, based on the projected sewer and
manhole inspections plus an allowance of $5,000.00 for miscellanecus charges
provided for in the specifications. A bid tabulation is attached to the
supporting agenda material.
10(b): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 1O PRIMARY CIARIFIERC NOS. 6-15 AND
RFNaTED FACT r= AT RFCIAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33.
Job No. P1-33, Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new 60 ngd primary
-2-
May 9, 1990
treatment facility and a new network of large diameter piping for plant effluent
... discharges at a cost of $39.7 million, the largest single project ever awarded
by the Districts. Change Order No. 2 includes three items of work and adds
$21,371.00 to the contract.
Item 1, for $4,497.00, includes additional telephone service conduit for
the office trailers that house the Districts' construction management staff.
The service romirsmnnts of the expanded telephone system exceeded the existing
telephone concuit's capacity and the additional conduit was not included in the
original contract. Item 2 is for modifications to the West Perimeter Road and
involved $15,498.00 of extra work. The extra work included an additional light
pole, the relocation of the specified security camera and modifications to the
concrete island. These modifications were required to increase the field of
vision, expand the camera's scanning capabilities and provide safety lighting at
the West Perimeter Road Entrance/Exit on Garfield Avenue.
Item 3, for $1,376.00, involves the extra costs of potholing an existing
Orange County Water District (OCWD) pipeline located on our property. OCWD
has requested the ability to maintain flows in their existing pipeline in lieu
of abandoning it as shown on the contract plans. The cost included in this
item is for verification of pipeline material and location. All costs included
in this item and all future items associated with OCWD pipelines will be paid by
OCWD.
The above-described changes would have been included in the original
design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for
replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for an addition of
$21,371.00 to the contract with Gist K. Newberg Construction Co. There is no
time extension associated with this change order.
10(c): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 EM FMABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8
AT FMAMAT'ION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-35-1.
Job No. P1-35-1 is for the rehabilitation of two digesters at Plant 1.
Rehabilitation includes the installation of high-rate sludge mixing systems to
improve digester gas production. Change Order No. 3 adds $92,392.00 to the $2.3
million contract for seven items of additional work and a time extension of 60
calendar days to the contract.
Item 1, in the amount of $51,479.00, is for relocating and installing a
new motor control center (Mx) from the digester pmmp control room to Power
Building C, which has a controlled environ re nt. The existing MC is corroded
beyond r pin and this work was not included in the original contract. Item 2,
in the amount of $8,800.00, is for replacing two existing defective plug valves
with ball valves which are compatible with the new, sludge piping system. Item
3, in the amount of $2,990.00, is for the addition of type 316 stainless steel
expandable hoops to seal the seven PLC lined mmrvsys to the concrete domes.
Item 4, in the amount of $11,040.00, is for the additional costs incurred with
the relocation of a 14-inch sludge mixing line which was changed to avoid
interference with an existing 8-inch primary sludge feed line. Additional pipe
and a higher wall penetration were required to prevent digester gas from being
trapped at the high point.
-3-
May 9, 1990
Item 5, in the amount of $4,073.00, is for the cost of upgrading mixing
pump electrical control boxes from a NM U rating to an to explosion rating
in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. Item 6, in the amount of $8,635.00,
is for the addition of outdoor lighting in a hazardous work area. The
lighting will provide a safer work area. Item 7, in the amount of $5,375.00, is
to replace existing damaged and missing aluminum grating inside the digester
control room which will provide a safer work area.
The above-described changes would have been included in the original
design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for
replaced work.
Staff recmmends approval of Change Order No. 3 adding $92,392.00 and 60
calendar days to the contract with S. A. Healy Co.
10(d): APPRMING SELECrION COM•D:T1EH CER=ICATION AND ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WrM BOYLE ENGGINF.E UM CORPORATION FOR
CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17.
In December 1989, the Directors awarded a construction contract in the
amount of $7,090,000 to J. R. Roberts Corp. for the construction of the new
Central laboratory. Construction is now in progress.
The plans and specifications for the new lab were prepared by Boyle
Engineering Corporation order a professional services agreement approved by the
Directors in August 1986. The agreement was amended in 1987 when the site for
the laboratory was changed. The agreement with Boyle provides for initial
project planning, design and construction support. However, the time period
between the beginning of Boyle's work and the project has been delayed, and the
estimated cmpleti.on of construction is lager than anticipated (now Spring of
1991). Therefore, Boyle has requested a cost increase in the amount of
$6,438.00 to account for the wage escalations that have occurred and impacted
the services contracted for in 1986.
The second item for the addendum relates to the Districts' construction
management work load. The Directors are aware that the Administration Building
Addition, Job No. J-7-4, and Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage
and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, (at a combined cost of about $8
million) are behind schedule, and being constructed by the same contractor as
the Central Laboratory. The original plans called for the completion of Jobs
J-7-4 and J-20 by the time the lab constriction started. In addition, the
Districts soon expect to begin on the construction of a new control center, Job
No. J-23-1.
The work load of these concurrent support facilities projects has
strained the Districts' construction management resources. Therefore, staff has
requested that Boyle provide additional construction support services for the
Central laboratory. Specifically, staff has requested a full-time Boyle
employee on site for the next year to menage the Central laboratory construction
project.
On April 11, 1990, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to
negotiate Addendum No. 2 with Boyle Engineering Corporation. Accordingly, the �
Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Boyle Engineering
Corporation providing for the additional work described above.
-4-
May 9, 1990
Proposed Proposed
E—sting Addendum Amended
Aareanent No. 2 Agre®ent
Professional Services,
(hourly rates including
labor plus overhead at
155.5 8), not to exceed $270,960 $ 6,438 $277,418
Direct Expenses,
not to exceed 5,000 -0- 5,000
Sntmnn,ltant Fees,
not to exceed 12,750 -0- 12,750
Fixed Profit 40,395 -0- 40,395
$329,105 $ 6,438 $335,543
Construction Management/
Inspection Personnel,
(hourly rate including
labor, overhead and
profit), at $80.00/hr. 156 16 $156,160
$329,105 $162,598 $491,703
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and
adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation. Copies of the certification and
resolution are attached with the supporting documents.
10(e): APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH K. P.
LINDSTROM INC. . RE ENVIROIrMa= AND TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR
COLLE ON, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACrr. TIES MASTER PLAN, ENVIRCIMTPAL
IMPACT REPORT AND OCEAN DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION.
In October 1987 the Directors approved a professional services agreement
with K. P. Lindstrom Inc. to provide technical and environmental services
support for preparation of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan, the Program Environmental Inpact Report on the Master plan, and the
Ocean Discharge Permit Application, collectively referred to as the "2020
VISION" Wastewater Managcnwnt Action Plan. K. P. Lindstrom has also been
assisting staff with sludge management, water conservation, reclamation,
legislation, ocean monitoring and regulatory agency liaison activities.
The consultant has continued to support staff in the implementation of
the Master Plan, EIR and the application permitting process for renewal of our
301(h) NPDFS Ocean Discharge Permit. It appears that it will be some time
before the EPA completes the review process. We expect that additional
information and clarifications of submitted data will be requested during the
-5-
May 9, 1990
review period and the consultant's assistance will be required. This ongoing
effort will require more ccord nation meetings and support activities than
originally anticipated, requiring higher travel expense.
Accordingly, the Consultant has requested a reallocation of expense
categories with no change in the total authorized contract amount. The
recommended contract category changes are as follows:
Proposed
Existing Proposed Amended
Asrea:ent Addn. No. 1 Acree:ent
Professional services,
at hourly rates for
labor, not to
exceed $ 280,000 $(7,000) $ 273,000
Direct expenses,
at cost 24,000 7,000 31,000
$ 304,000 $ -0- $ 304,000
There is no change in the total contract amount as the work will be
accomplished within the $304,000.00 budget.
10(f) : APPROVE PURCHASE ORDER TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) FOR STANDBY
ELEC mTCAL POWER SERVICE AT PLANT NO. 1.
The critical nature of the Districts' operations requires a highly
reliable electrical power supply. A lengthy plant shutdown created by a power
outage could be catastrophic and, obviously, is an unacceptable situation. The
staff has analyzed the existing electrical service and believes that the
reliability and flexibility can be greatly improved by the addition of a standby
electrical service.
Staff presented the problem to Southern California Edison (SCE) and
solicited a recommendation. SCE recommended that a second, underground standby
service be installed which would preclude a possible outage created by an
automobile running into a power pole. Staff concurred and requested that SCE
prepare doc:ments necessary for installation of the standby power source to
enhance the Districts' electrical power reliability. Plant No. 1 will have two
separate electric power services- above-ground active and one underground
standby, thereby enhancing the power supply with a higher degree of reliability
and flexibility.
Staff recom:ends authorization for the General Manager to execute the SCE
application and contract and to issue a purchase order to SCE in the amount of
$69,499.00 for the installation of the 4,000 KW standby underground electric
power service for Plant No. 1. The contract has been approved by the General
Counsel.
10(g): AVTHCRIZING REPAIRS TO SOLAR EMEFJMWY GENERATOR NO. 3 AT PLANT' NO. 1,
SPECIFICATION NO. R-036.
The Districts have Solar gas turbines that provide 800 KW each of
emergency electrical power to the secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 1.
-6-
May 9, 1990
In February 1990, while routinely exercising Unit No. 3, staff observed the unit
making an unexplained noise. The unit was imeHately shut down for inspection.
The inspection revealed that a foreign object (we suspect a rivet) had
care loose and broken a turbine blade off the first stage of the compressor. At
the time of this incident the turbine was rotating in excess of 22,000 rpm. The
unit was taken out of service and shipped to Solar's facilities in Texas for a
complete inspection. Our mechanical division supervisor observed the inspection
and it has been determined that the broken blade made its way through the
compressor, the combustor and the first two stages of the turbine itself. Along
the way it damaged the complete compressor rotor assembly and the first two
stages of the turbine.
Solar Turbines, Inc., the manufacturer of the gas turbine, has agreed to
repair the unit for an amount not to exceed $45,000.00, plus applicable sales
tax. This price has been negotiated down from Solar's original estimate of
$95,400.00. The cost of a new unit is $119,000.00, plus sales tax. The best
price that we have been able to obtain to rent a similar unit is $72,000.00 per
yam-
Staff recommends that a purchase order be issued to Solar Turbines,
Inc., be authorized in an amount not to exceed $45,000.00, plus sales tax, for
the repair and installation of the unit.
10(h): AMENDING BOARD P=ON OF APRILL 11, 1190 AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF NINE
PICKUP TRUCKS, SPECIFICATION No. A-150-2, FROM FOISOM LAKE FORD.
At the Board meeting of April 11, 1990, authorization was given for
Districts' staff to award purchase order contracts for five sedans and nine
pickup trucks. The awards were based on participation in the Cooperative
Procurement Program provided by the State of California for procurement of the
vehicles from dealers in our geographical area. The five sedans were Ford
Tempos to be purchased from Reuter Ford in Glendale; and the nine pickup trucks
were for the Chevrolet Model S10, to be purchased from Michael Chevrolet in
Fresno. As part of our SCIQMID Regulation XV compliance program, the Districts
are investigating the conversion of selected vehicles from gasoline powered to
liquid propane, electric, and/or any other power source that will assist in
clean air goals. The above purchases were therefore made subject to the
confi nntion that the vehicles could be converted to "clean burn" fuel.
From our investigations, it has been determined that vehicles
manufactured by General Motors can not comply with the California required
emission test when the power source is converted to liquid propane gas (LPG) ,
whereas vehicles manufactured by Ford can comply.
The State of California Procurement Policy is for public agencies to
purchase their vehicles from the dealer(s) selected in their geographic area.
There are no Ford dealers that supply comparable pickup trucks under the State's
program in the Southern California area. However, in the Sacramento area the
State's award was made to Folsom Lake Ford for Ford Ranger pickup trucks, which
are comparable to the Chevrolet S10. Due to our special requirement, the State
Procurement Office has approved the Ford purchase from the Sacramento area. The
cost for the nine Ford pickups from Folsom Take Ford, including delivery charges
from Sacramento, is estimated to cost approximately $1,076.00 less than
authorized by the Hoards in April for purchase of the Chevrolet models from
Michael Chevrolet in Fresno.
-7-
May 9, 1990
It is therefore recamended that the original Board action on April llth
authorizing purchase of nine Chevrolet Model S10 pickup trucks be amended to
revoke the purchase from Michael Chevrolet of Ios Angeles, and that Districts'
staff be authorized instead to issue a purchase order through the State of
California Procurement Program, to Folsom Lake Ford for nine Ford Banger pickup
trucks (Specification No. A-150-2), for an amount of $84,331.89 plus sales tax
and delivery charges.
10(i): DENY APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM--RE LYNN REDHAN.
The Districts have received an Application for Percussion to Present
late Claim pursuant to Government Code Section 911.4 by the attorney
representing employee Lynn Reitman. The claim asserts that Mr. Redman has
incurred personal injuries because of his exposure to sewage treatment plant
operations.
Attached to the agenda material is a memorandum from the General Counsel
recamending that the request be denied.
DISTRICT 2
10(j): APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PORTION
OF THE EUCLID nUERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT' NO. 2-26-2, AND SOUTH ANAHEIM
RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-27.
This project is the installation of vitrified clay and reinforced
concrete gravity sewer relief lines. Contract No. 2-26-2, Portion of the Euclid
Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Iampson Avenue, and Contract
No. 2-27, the South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and
Walnut Street, in the total amount of $9.7 mullion, are located within the
Cities of Garden Grove, Santa Ana, Fountain Valley and Anaheim. Change Order
No. 6, in the amount of $77,778.00 adds six items of work and 14 calendar days
to the contract.
Item 1, in the amount of $4,760.00, is for additional water line valves
requested by the City of Garden Grove. This is a reimbursable item from Garden
Grove. Item 2, in the amount of $6,870.00, is for a temporary connection and
permanent relocation of an 8-inch water line shown incorrectly on the plans.
In December the staff reported to the Directors that the City of Garden
Grove had awarded a contract within Nelson Street for the construction of new
water mains, stone drain facilities and street improve ants. The District's
project and the City's improvements were coordinated prior to contract award;
however, the City has been unable to proceed as planned and certain changes were
therefore required to the District's project so that the sewer work could
proceed. The District's original construction documents provided that the
Euclid Interceptor would be constructed in the easterly side of Nelson Street
within right-of-way to be acquired by the City of Garden Grove. The City was
unable to acquire the right-of-way as scheduled and, thus, while under
construction, it was necessary for the sewer alignment to be changed by the
District to stay within existing right-of-Dray. Staff also reported in December
that there would be additional costs associated with the work within Nelson
Street for protection of utilities, including power, water, sewer and gas lines
which were to have been relocated by the City, or were affected by the need to
change the sewer alignment; and that several change orders would be presented to
-8-
May 9, 1990
the Board to cover the contractor's costs associated with these changes.
Item 3, in the amount of $33,004.00, is for the protection and relocation
of several utilities on Nelson Street, between Stanford Avenue and Iampson
Avenue, which were to be moved prior to construction by the City of Garden
Grove. (Previous Change Order No. 3, Item 2, paid for extra utility work on
Nelson Street between Pearl Street and Stanford Avenue for the same reason. )
Item 4, in the amount of $1,760.00, is for delays caused by the City of
Orden Grove when a water line could not be isolated. Item 51 in the amount of
$1,340.00, is for additional project signs for added safety precautions for the
motoring public. Item 6, in the amount of $30,044.00, is for the protection and
repair of several undisclosed utilities.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 adding $77,778.00 and a
time extension of 14 calendar days to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corporation.
10(k): APPROVE AGEUM4Wr AND 1URQJASE ORDER WITH SWfH M CAI.TP0FU IA GAS
CCMPANY FOR RELOCATION OF GAS MAIN RE CONSTRUCTION OF KATELIA RELIEF
SEWER, CONnWr NO. 2-28.
In June, the Directors will be considering the approval of the plans
and specifications for a portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer between Broadway
and Orangethorpe Avenues, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer between
Euclid and Walnut Streets, Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer,
Contract No. 2-29.
The final design for these projects was based on information provided by
the cities of Anaheim and Fullerton as well as input furnished by public and
private utilities, including the Southern California Gas Company, on the
location of their existing facilities. A key element at all three project
locations in establishing the alignment of the sewer system was the ability to
provide adequate traffic detours along the major streets for the safety and
protection of the traveling public. All interested parties, including the
District, have agreed that the best overall alignment along Katella Avenue
(Contract No. 2-28) to accomplish this goal requires the relocation of about
1,400 feet of 4-inch steel gas main and service connections to allow the
construction of the new 27-inch vitrified clay pipe sewer. The Southern
California Gas Company has estimated the cost of the mein relocation to be about
$70,000.00 (final payment will be based on actual costs) .
The recommended action is to authorize the General Manager execute a
Collectible Work Authorization and Indemnification Agreement and to issue a
purchase order to Southern California Gas Company in an amount not to exceed
$70,000.00 for the necessary relocation work. The agreement has been approved
by General Counsel.
DISTRICTS 5 AND 6
10(1): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 7O FUMBII.ImnTTON OF BALBOA TRUNK SEWER.
CGNTTWT NO. 5-27-1, AND INVESTIGATION OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY
SEWER, CL4SINM.T NO. 5-37-2, AND ACCEPMNCE OF JOB AS CU41I=.
This project consists of two contracts. The first contract is the
rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, between 32nd Street and Coronado Street
in Newport Boulevard and Balboa Boulevard in Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-27-1,
-9-
May 9, 1990
which includes the pressure testing and chemical grouting of sewer pipeline
joints. The second contract is the inspection of a portion of the Pacific Coast �..i
Highway Seer between Bitter Point Pump Station and Dover Drive in Newport
Beach, which includes cleaning the sewer and bypassing as necessary to videotape
the inside of the pipe, to assess the condition of the sewer with regard to
location of leaks and cracks. The data from this inspection will be used to
determine the need and type of repairs to be accomplished in a future contract.
(1) Chance Order No. 1
Item 1 is a 60-day time extension. At the time of award of the
contract, the Contractor had mobilized all of his available labor and
equipment to help repair sewers in San Francisco which were damaged by
the large earthquake. It was determined in the best interests of all
concerned and the public in general to delay the start of our
construction contract until the Contractor could finish the emergency
work in San Francisco.
Item 2, in the amount of $1,305.00, is for the video inspection of
an additional 660 linear feet of the Pacific Coast Highway Sewer not
included in the original contract.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $1,305.00
and a time extension of 60 calendar days to the contract with National
Plant Services, Inc.
(2) Closeout Agreement
National Plant Services, Inc. has fulfilled all contractual
obligations within the specified and authorized extensions of time.
Staff therefore recartmends adoption of the resolution attached to the
agenda material authorizing acceptance of the work as complete,
execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of
Co pleticn as required. The final project cost is $109,626.40.
DISTRICD 7
10(m): ORDERING ANNEXATION 129—GAMUM ANNEXATION 7b COUNTY SANITAPSON
DISTRICT NO. 7.
This 2.47-acre annexation is for one single family residence (under
construction) in the vicinity of Amapola Avenue and Orange Park Boulevard in
unincorporated county territory within Orange Park Acres. The local seaering
agency is District 7.
The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated
agreement with the County of Orange re AS 8 tax exchanges for annexing
properties.
es.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda
material ordering Annexation No. 129.
-10-
May 9, 1990
10(n) : APPROVE RED4BURSEGffi7T AJMU MRV FOR SEWER LINE CONSPRUMON IN BA7A
PANORAMA WITH GEORGE ADAGE, JR.
Mr. George Adams, Jr. is building a house on Lot 8 of Tract 939. In
order to provide sewer service to this parcel he has constructed a Public sewer
along Baja Panorama Street which will have the capacity to serve six lots,
including his own. The owners of Iots 10, 11 and 12 have already paid their
fair share of the cost of construction directly to Mr. Adams. The agreement
provides that CSD 7 will collect a fair share of the construction cost ($8,257
per lot) from the remaining lot owners (7 and 9) when and if the lots develop,
and reimburse the owner if the cc nection is made within five years (less a five
percent administrative charge) . If the connection is made after five years, the
District retains the full amount collected.
Staff recommends approval of the agreement.
ALL DISTRICTS
12: REPORT AND RECODMMMONS OF E:®CUrIVE CCM II= GD; 11C.
The Executive Committee net on April 25, 1990. Enclosed for the
Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recamendations.
13, 14, 15 AND 16: PUBLIC HEARMG AND CC SIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF 1990-91
SEWER CCNNE TION AND USER FMS4.
The Boards' adopted Financial Plan provides for financing sewerage
facilities expansion (capacity increases) with sewer connection fees paid by new
development; facilities rehabilitation and improved treatment by borrowing
capital funds in the securities market; and operations, mainntenanne and new debt
service by a combination of property taxes and use fees.
Each year, as part of the budget process, staff updates the Financial Plan
fiscal projections and recommends connection and user fee rates required to
finance Districts' activities for the ensuing year. At the April llth Joint
Board meeting, preliminary staff reports were presented to the Boards and
ordinances were introduced to fix the above sewer connection and user fees for
1990-91. First reading of the respective ordinances was held and passed to
second reading and a public hearing at the regular Joint Board meeting on
May 9th.
On April 27th, a complete and final staff report updating the financial
projections and setting forth recommended sewer connection and user fee rates
for 1990-91 was mailed under separate cover to the Directors. The report
rercu.uends the following rates:
e SEWER CONNECTION FEE
Dwelling Unit $2,280
Camercial/Industrial/ $460/1,000 sq. ft.
Institutional Property
-11-
May 9, 1990
° USER FEES
Single Fam. Multi-Fam. Commercial/Indust.
District Residential Residential Govermnental/Other
1 $55.00 $33.00/Unit $39.00/1000 sq.ft.
3 50.00 30.00/Unit 36.00/1000 sq.ft.
5 55.00 33.00/Unit 39.00/1000 sq.ft.
6 55.00 33.00/Unit 39.00/1000 sq.ft.
11 50.00 30.00/Unit 36.00/1000 sq.ft.
13 95.00 57.00/Unit 68.00/1000 sq.ft.
The actions appearing on the agenda are to hold the second reading and
public hearing on the proposed ordinances fixing seiner connection and user fees
for 1990-91, consideration of adoption of said ordinances; and adoption of
resolutions authorizing and directing the County Auditor-Controller to collect
the user fees on the annual properly tax bill.
17: AMM FOR CIOSED SESSION.
Promo time to tdae it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed
session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending
litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exeapt from public
disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a
situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda,
this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed
session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards.
DISTRICTS 3 AND 11
33: CONSIDERATION OF ACTIONS RE FINANCING, DESIGN, CO]STRUCTICN, CAPACITY
ONNERSBIP AND OPERATION OF CERTAIN MPSTER-PIANNED SEWAGE COLLECTION
FACILITIES FOR SERVING DISTRICTS 3 AND 11.
Master-Planned Sewer Facilities
Over the past several years, the Directors have authorized staff and
consultants to engage in various activities dealing with the long-term sewage
collection needs of the northwesterly portion of County Sanitation District 11
(CSD 11) and a small portion of County Sanitation District 3 (CSD 3) which
drains to CSD 11's Slater Avenue Pulp Station. The completed studies include a
1988 report prepared by Willdan Associates which dealt with the possible
exchange of drainage areas between CSD 3 and CSD 11; the 1989 Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan (30-year Wastewater Management
Action Plan, 112020 VISION'), and a recently completed Project Report on the
Slater Avenue Punp Station Sewage System Inprovements, Contract No. 11-17.
In general, the studies analyzed the needed sewage facilities for CSD 3
and CSD 11 and prioritized their need, concluded that the long planned extension
of the Coast Trunk Suer should be replaced with the reconstruction of the
Slater Avenue Pump Station by both CSD 3 and CSD 11 (this change is projected to
save CSD 3 $600,000 and ORD 11 $4,700,000) and that construction costs be shared
in accordance with sewage flows generated from) each District.
-12-
May 9, 1990
Enclosed with the supporting agenda material is a copy of a Project
Report on Slater Avenue Pimp Station Sewage System Improvarents prepared by John
Carollo Engineers, and a Staff Report which smmerizes the Project Report in
some detail. The most urgent eleffent of the Project Report is the
reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station including the influent and
discharge facilities. Those facilities, the Slater Avenue Pmmp Station Influent
Relief Sewer, the Slater Avenue force Main, Gravity Sewer and Diversion
Structure and the Slater Avenue Pump Station, will cost $7,600,000. The second
priority is the replacement of the Goldemest Trunk Sewer, south of Heil Avenue
between Slater Avenue and Heil Avenue, at a cost of $4,300,000. Additional
facilities include the parallel Slater Avenue Trunk, the Heil Avenue
interceptor, iuprovernts in Warner Avenue west of Springdale Street, and new
lines in Springdale and Goldernest Streets north of McFadden Avenue and Edinger
Avenue respectively.
The Staff Report also comments on capacity exchanges in existing and
proposed sewage facilities. CSD 3 discharges to existing CSD 11 facilities,
including the Slater Avenue Pump Station sewerage system and the existing Coast
Trunk System. The proposed capacity exchange in the respective trunk sewer
facilities by each District would result in a net equity purchase in the amamt
of $630,836.00 by CSD 3 from CSD 11.
Financino
The Project Report estimated the total cost for the Slater Avenue Puap
Station, influent sewers, and discharge facilities at slightly under $18
million. of this total-, CSD 3 wound pay $1,050,000 and CSD 11 would pay
$16,950,000. (In addition, both Districts have other facilities to construct
identified in the 1989 Master Plan.) As previously discussed, CSD 3 would also
pay CSD 11 $630,836 for capacity equity in CSD 11's existing facilities.
The priority items, the Slater Avenue Punp Station including the
influent and discharge facilities previously described, will cost $7,600,000,
with CSD 11 paying $6,550,000 and CSD 3 paying $1,050,000.
The priority work and other long-term capital construction costs,
however, will require the infusion of additional funds. For CSD 11, the
issuance of debt or prepayment of annexation and connection fees will be
necessary prior to construction of the facilities.
The development of Holes China (see discussion below) and other vacant
areas within the northwesterly portion of CSD 11 including the Meadowlark
Airport, the Mcdonnell Douglas site, sma11 lot in-]wilding, etc. will provide
fee revenue, if collected on a timely basis, to provide the necessary capital.
For CSD 3, the development of the Holly-Sea cliff properties (partially
within both CSD 3 and CSD 11), will more than offset the funding necessary for
the prorated cost sharing of the Slater Avenue Punp Station Sewage System
Lmgrove ants.
Bolsa China Annexation to CSD 11
In April 1987, the Directors of CSD 11 authorized staff and General
Counsel to meet and negotiate with the owners of a proxi, ately 1608 acres, led
by the principal landowner, Signal Bolsa Corporation, for annexation of the
-13-
May 9, 1990
Bohm Chica to CSD 11. The Bolsa Chica area is presently outside the boundary
of CSD 11, but within its sphere of influence. The major landowner has had �...
ongoing negotiations with the County of Orange, the City of Huntington Beach and
the District pertaining to development issues, .including the timely construction
of sewer service facilities. The proposed Slater Avenue pump Station is
pertly master-planned to serve the Bolsa Chita area. While the total
annexation is 1608 acres, only about 340 acres are proposed for development, of
which 312 are vaned by Signal Boles. The rest will remain wetlands, or is owned
by others.
Signal Bolsa principals and counsel and District staff and Counsel have
met numerous times over the past several years in an attempt to hammer out a
preannexation areement. The last agreement draft submitted by CSD 11 provides
for the annexation of the Bolas Chica area and payment of fees for those areas
to be developed by Signal Bolsa. Other areas will receive deferred annexation,
i.e., if and when they develop, annexation charges would be at the
then-prevailing rate, but a separate annexation would not be necessary.
Signal Bolsa Corporation is not yet ready to annex, however, they had previously
agreed to enter into the agreement to be assured of eventual sewer service and
to provide needed funding for the necessary design services. Accordingly, the
draft preannexation agreement provides for payment of $250,000.00 30 days after
approval, $500,000.00 or more 90 days after approval, and $500,000.00 or more
180 days after approval, and the balance within one year of the execution of the
agreement. Each time a payment is made, an equivalent acreage world be
considered to be annexed by dividing the payment amount by the then-current
annexation acreage charge.
After almost five years of negotiations and early commitments by Signal
Bolsa, they have just recently advised the staff that they are no longer willing
to proceed with the proposed preamnexation agreement. Discussions are ongoing
and staff will update the District 11 Directors at the Board meeting.
Reco m andations
The enclosed Staff Report concludes with the recommended actions
appearing on the agenda for financing, design, construction, caps city ownership
and operation of certain nester-planned sewage collection facilities for serving
Districts 3 and 11.
�r
-14-
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 12(a)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
M ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
April 25, 1990
10044 ELLIS AVENUE
PO BOX 0127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
(7141962.2411
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: April 25, 1990 - 5:30 p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Director James Neal
Director Arthur Newton
Buck Catlin Joint Chairman Director Phil Sansone
William Mahoney Vice Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Beth Jines, DOHS
Richard B. Edgar Past Joint Chairman Mark Leary, DOHS
Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman Ted Rauh, DOHS
Dan Griset Chairman, District 1 David Jones, EPA
Roland Bigonger Chairman, District 2 P. Ravi Shanker, SAWPA
Richard Polis Chairman, District 3
Evelyn Hart Chairman, District 5
James Wahner Chairman, District 6 STAFF PRESENT:
Don E. Smith Chairman, District 7/Past JC
Tom Mays Chairman, District it J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 13 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
Don Roth County Supervisor Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Roger Stanton County Supervisor Ed Hodges, Sr. Facilities Manager,
Maintenance
Absent: Rich von Langan, Source Control Mgr.
Peer Swan Chairman, District 14
1) Status Report on Long-Term Plan for Stringfellow Clean-up.
.In 1985, after considerable discussion and debate, the Boards authorized
the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) to issue temporary permits for
discharge of treated groundwater from the Stringfellow site to the Sanitation
Districts' sewerage system, pending completion of a study and determination on
the long-term solution to the Stringfellow clean-up problem.
The California Department of Health Services (DOHS) and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have periodically updated the
Directors on the Stringfellow Program. Because the study and report process and
a determination on a long-term solution are nearing completion, DOHS and EPA
were asked to brief the Committee on the status of the Stringfellow site
remediation project. Enclosed is a copy of the Districts' letter requesting the
briefing and a copy of a report summarizing staff's understanding of the status
of the Stringfellow clean-up project.
v Ted Rauh, Beth Jines and Mark Leary, representing the DOHS, and Dave Jones,.
representing the EPA, attended the meeting and briefed the Committee on the
status of the Stringfellow Project, following which the members posed several
questions to DOHS and EPA and offered comments and their views on the clean-up
. program and the long-term remedial alternatives.
(1 of 4)
Executive Committee Report
April 25, 1990
At the conclusion of the discussion the Chairman thanked the DOHS and EPA
representatives for the update and advised them that the Districts wish to be
kept fully informed and consulted as the process proceeds; that the Districts
have a legitimate concern about any proposals to turn the project over to the
principal responsible parties (PRP's - firms that disposed of the original
wastes at the site) and wish to be included in that process as well ; and that
it should not be assumed that the Stringfellow treated groundwater can be
discharged indefinitely into the Districts' sewerage system.
2) Proposed Revisions to Policies and Procedures for Selection of
Professional Architectural and Engineering Services,
Since 1976 the Boards have had separate policies and procedures for the
selection of professional engineering and architectural services which are
reviewed periodically and updated by the Directors.
The General Counsel has recently completed a review of new legislation on
this subject, together with the current policy and procedure of the Districts,
and has recommended some minor revisions and modifications which he reviewed
with the Committee members at the March meeting. Following the Committee's
review, the proposed new policy resolution was referred back to Counsel and
staff to incorporate revisions suggested by Committee members.
The General Counsel reviewed the enclosed, revised draft resolution
Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Selection and Procurement of
. Professional Engineering, Architectural , Environmental , Land Surveying and
Construction Management Services, which incorporates the Committee's suggestions
in Section 4:B.3.b., on Pages 4 and 5; and Section 8, on Pages 9 and 10. During
the discussion that followed the provisions of Section 8 regarding Conflicts of
Interest and its relation to other statutory requirements affecting Directors
and staff were clarified.
Recommendation: The Executive Committee recommends adoption of the revised
proposed resolution Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Selection and .
Procurement of Professional Engineering, Architectural , Environmental , Land
Surveying and Construction Management Services.
3) Status Report on Industrial Waste Ordinance Enforcement Action
Litigation.
The General Counsel reviewed his enclosed memoranda on the status of the
separate legal proceedings filed by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson and Universal Circuits,
Inc. , over industrial waste enforcement actions taken by the Districts.
With regard to Universal Circuits, Mr. Woodruff,added that the decision
from the trial judge in the matter of Universal Circuits, Inc. v. Count
Sanitation District Na. 1, had still not been received as of the OUP date.
The decision was anticipated to be handed down by the court within the next two
(2 of 4)
Executive Committee Report
April 25, 1990
days. The General Counsel also reported that the matter of litigation, wherein
the District has filed suit against Universal Circuits seeking to recover civil
administrative penalties, is proceeding in accordance with the regular Court
schedule, and no trial date has been set. These Court proceedings both relate
to Universal 's existing operation on Newport Circle Drive in Santa Ana.
Mr. Woodruff further reported that representatives of Universal Circuits
were present and available tonight to address the Board relative to setting a
date at which the Executive Committee would hear the matter of the application
for a new industrial waste discharge permit for the Company's new facility
located at 2249 South Yale Street, Santa Ana, California. Mr. Woodruff reported
that the application had been filed some time ago and that the technical
information, including plans and specifications for the pretreatment system, had
been deficient, and the application was not deemed complete until receipt of the
information on Monday, April 23, 1990. In response to a question from a
Director, Mr. Woodruff reported that the staff had completed the review of the
technical aspects of the pretreatment system and determined it complete, but a
full determination and staff report had not been able to be prepared prior to
this meeting. Mr. Woodruff noted that if the General Manager reconnended
Issuing a permit, it would be subject to a condition that that decision be
affirmed by approval of the Executive Committee; and if the General Manager
denied the permit, any appeal by Universal Circuits would also be heard by the
Executive Committee. Mr. Woodruff related that Universal wished to address the
Board to request the matter be expedited so that it would facilitate an early
opening of the new plant.
A motion was duly made and seconded that in the absence of having a
complete and full staff report at this time, no consideration for expediting the
hearing process be afforded to the permit applicant. The motion wasunanimously
approved with directions that the matter be presented to the Executive Committee
in accordance with the established District procedures set forth in the adopted
Ordinance and Guidelines.
4) A reement far Professional ConsultingServices with F. E. Carleton
re SCA MD Issues.
Pursuant to the 1989 adoption of the South Coast Air Quality Management
District's (SCAQMD) Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) , new regulations, and
revisions to existing regulations and rules and permit conditions, are being
proposed and implemented by SCAQMD. As the Directors know, Districts' staff
and consultants spend a considerable amount of time addressing these issues.
In the early 1980's, SCAQMD permits to construct (PTC) required that the
Districts install best available control technology (BACT). Subsequently; in
addition to BACT, the Districts have had to provide emission offsets in
accordance with Regulation XIII, New Source Review, which is currently in the
process of being modified and which will further impact our ability to obtain
SCAQMD permits. More recently T-BACT (best available control technology for
toxics) has been added. About the same time, additional requirements dealing
(3 of 4)
. i J
Executive Committee Report
April 25, 1990
with health risk assessments were added. The latest addition to the
requirements to obtain a permit is the requirement of conformity, which means
that the cities served by the treatment plant project must be in conformity
with the AQMP.
From time to time the Districts have engaged the professional consulting
services of F. E. Carleton to assist in the permitting of various treatment
plant projects. Those projects have included the central generation facilities
at both plants and the treatment plant expansion at the Fountain Valley
Reclamation Plant, both now under construction. Staff has also issued separate
purchase orders to Carleton for smaller projects within staff authority.
Carleton specializes in SCAQMD issues and is located in Pasadena near SCAQMD
headquarters, and has been very helpful in dealing with the SCAQMD, Districts'
consultants and Districts' staff, by providing guidance and services necessary
to obtain the PTCs. Staff believes that those services will be needed on
current and planned Districts' projects, including the secondary expansion
projects at both treatment plants, now under design, and future primary
expansion tentatively planned for the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant.
Carleton is of considerable assistance in obtaining PTCs as well as assisting
with comments on proposed rules and regulations and their effect upon the
Districts, Including the New Source Review discussed above.
Staff has therefore recommended that rather than issuing individual purchase
orders specific to projects, that the Boards consider authorizing a blanket
'purchase order in the amount of $50,000 for Carleton's professional services on
an as-needed basis. Mr. Carleton bills at the rate of $95.00 per hour including
expenses.
Recommendation: The Executive Committee recommends that staff be
authorized to issue a purchase order to F. E. Carleton in an amount not to
exceed $50,000.00 for professional consulting services, on an as-needed basis,
at the rate of $95.00 per hour, to assist the Districts in obtaining permits
from the SCAQMD for current and future projects at both treatment plants, and
for assistance relative to other SCAQMD issues.
JWS:sc
Attc..
(4 of 4)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX$127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
3
108"ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962-2411
April 18, 1990
REF #090517.LTR
Department of Health Services
714/744 P Street
P.O. Box 942732
Sacramento, CA 94234-7320
Attention: Mr. Ted Rauh, Chief Program and Administrative
Support Section, Toxic Substances Control Division
Subject: Stringfellow Site Status Report
This letter is to confirm that the California Department of Health Services
(DHS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are tentatively scheduled
to brief the Districts' Executive Committee on the status of the Stringfellow
Site Remediation project. The meeting will start with a light dinner at 5:30
p.m. on Wednesday, April 25, 1990 at the Districts' offices.
As we understand it, the final plan for remediation of the site includes the
Districts' potential role in the continued disposal of treated wastewater or
brine. As you know, the Directors and some members of the public are very
interested in the potential impacts of the Stringfellow treated groundwater on
the Districts' facilities, water reclamation projects, beneficial use of
sludge, and our coastal ocean waters. Therefore, as part of your
presentation, we would like you to discuss the quantity and quality of the
wastewater, the length of time that the Districts are envisioned to be
involved, and the proposed plan and time schedule for the overall clean-up of
the site and the contaminated groundwater in the surrounding area.
Currently the Districts and Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority have allowed
the Stringfellow permit to be assigned to the EPA. With the EPA and the DHS
wanting the principle responsible parties to take full financial and possibly
operational responsibility for all Superfund Sites, the Districts are
interested in any proposed changes that you may be contemplating to the
assignment of the permit at the time of renewal as we have concerns over the
issue of assigning operational responsibilities.
1
In summary we would like your briefing of the Executive Committee to include
the following four areas:
1. Describe the process undertaken by DHS to evaluate the various
alternative technologies proposed for the Stringfellow site. Economics,
implementability, and environmental impacts should be briefly covered.
As part of the discussion on economics, please provide the following
information:
a) The mass of the material that was originally in the landfill site.
b) The mass that has been removed.
c) For the selected alternative, the unit cost for removing the
remaining material .
2. Describe the proposed long-term remediation alternatives, and the
Districts' potential role in accepting the treated groundwater,
including the quality, quantity, and length of the time that the
remediation might take. Describe the long-term quality assurance
provisions that are contemplated to guarantee consistent compliance with
the discharge requirements for the treated groundwater.
3. Describe the impacts any Stringfellow Site discharge of treated
groundwater to the Districts' system would have on the operation of the
Districts' collection and treatment system, the beneficial reclamation
of water and reuse of sludge, and the effect on the ocean environment.
4. Describe who will operate the treatment plant, how its long-term
operation will be financed, and who the proposed permittee is, including
any contemplated requests that the Districts consider the assignment of
the permit to another party.
We look forward to your presentation on April 25th. Should you have any
questions, please contact the undersigned.
fanager
a ter
G era
JWS:RVL:lab
REF 5090517.LTR
2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
w ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
1B EWSAVENUE
PO.BOX 9127
April 19, 1990 MUWJUN VA .ceuwBwA 92J2 127
01X19824a11
STAFF REPORT
STRINGFELLOW LONG-TERM REMEDIAL PLAN
The purpose of this report is to update the Directors on the status of the
Stringfellow site, provide an overview of the California Department of Health
Services (DOHS) draft report entitled "Stringfellow Facility Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study: Development and Initial Screening of
Alternatives", and report on recent actions to mitigate contamination of
groundwater at the site.
STRINGFELLOW BACKGROUND
The Stringfellow hazardous waste site was operated as a hazardous waste
disposal facility from 1956 to 1972. It is located in the middle of a narrow
box canyon one-half mile north of Highway 60 in Riverside County near Glen
Avon (see Attachment 1).
Approximately 34 million gallons of liquid industrial waste from Los Angeles,
Orange, and other surrounding counties were deposited at the site. Included
in this amount were spent acids, caustics, solvents, pesticides, cyanides, and
metal compounds. The site was eventually closed when it became apparent that
liquid waste was percolating from the waste pits into the groundwater and that
a plume of contaminated groundwater was migrating down-canyon toward the
community of Glen Avon and into the Chino Basin, endangering the underground
fresh water basin. Mitigation measures began in 1980 with the draining and
minor excavation of the open disposal pits and covering them with a clay cap.
Also included were concrete diversion channels that intercept surface flows
and divert them away from the site.
INTERIM REMEDIAL PLAN
The Sanitation Districts became involved in the project when the Santa Ana
Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) approached us for authorization to permit
contaminated groundwater extracted from the Stringfellow site to be discharged
to the Districts' sewerage system after pretreatment to Districts' standards.
Conditional permission was granted in late 1984 by the Boards of Directors -
after having considered the suitability of the project for discharge to the
Districts' sewer system.
1
In December 1985, the interim remedial plan was executed and discharge �..�
commenced from the Stringfellow treatment plant constructed by the DOHS and
operated by EPA. Daily analysis of the treated groundwater has shown that the
discharge is consistently in full compliance with the stringent limitations of
the discharge permit issued by SAWPA as authorized by the Districts. The
plant is currently operating at approximately 35,000 to 45,000 gallons per
day. The interim permit allows up to 187,000 gallons per day.
The Districts authorized SAWPA to extend the permit to December 1990 with the
anticipation that a Record of Decision (ROD) by EPA, specifying the selected
long-term alternative for remediation and delineating the Districts' proposed
involvement in the clean-up program would be finalized by then. The ROD is
now expected in May or June, 1990.
DOHS REPORT - STRINGFELLOW DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT
In June 1988, the DOHS issued a report entitled "Stringfellow Draft
Feasibility Study Report" (FS). The purpose of the DOHS report was to
formulate broad, alternative long-term remedial actions to prevent or minimize
the migration of contaminated groundwater from the Stringfellow site, and to
prevent or minimize the impact of contaminants which have already migrated
from the site. The report screens the alternative remedial actions for
protection of human health and the environment; compliance with applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements of State and federal laws; long-term
effectiveness and permanence; reduction of toxicity, mobility, or volume;
short-term effectiveness; implementability; cost; State acceptance; and
community acceptance. The report was termed a "working document" and was used
for discussion at community meetings involving the DOHS, EPA, and the public.
The staff provided the Directors with a summary of the report in September,
1988.
LONG-TERM REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
The long-term solution to the cleanup of the Stringfellow site will address
four zones of contamination:
Zone 1: On-Site/Upper Mid-Canyon Area
The on-site/upper mid-canyon zone includes the original disposal area
consisting of approximately 17 acres in the northern area of Pyrite
Canyon southward to about 600 feet south of the subsurface barrier wall .
On-site groundwater is heavily contaminated with a large number of
organic and inorganic contaminants including heavy metals. Zone 1 has
no residential or commercial population. Contaminated groundwater from
this zone is designated as Stream A.
2
Zone 2: Mid-Canyon Area
The mid-canyon zone encompasses the portion of Pyrite Canyon that
extends from the southern edge of Zone 1 southward to the existing set
of mid-canyon extraction wells. This zone contains a moderately to
heavily contaminated groundwater plume but no identified site-related
soil contamination. The major contaminants are water soluble consisting
primarily of mobile, volatile organics (principally TCE and chloroform)
and inorganics (nitrates and sulfates) . The groundwater contains
virtually no heavy metals. Zone 2 has no residential population and
very limited commercial use. Contaminated groundwater from this zone is
designated as Stream B.
Zone 3: Lower Canyon Area
The lower canyon zone extends from the mid-canyon extraction wells
southward to the lower canyon (freeway) groundwater extraction system
that is being constructed across the plume just north of Highway 60.
This zone contains low to moderate groundwater contamination.
Contaminants primarily consist of mobile, volatile organics (principally
ICE and chloroform) and inorganic sulfate and nitrate compounds. No
surface soil or surface water contamination related to the Stringfellow
Site was found in this zone during the Remedial Investigation. Zone 3
contains one private residence, two active business concerns (excluding
the rock quarry), and other privately owned land. Contaminated
groundwater from this zone is designated as Stream C.
Zone 4: Glen Avon Community
The Glen Avon community zone includes the area from Highway 60 southward
to the southernmost edges of the plume of contaminated groundwater
stemming from the Stringfellow Site. Groundwater contamination is the
only known present impact from the site, and is restricted to low levels
of a small number of mobile, volatile organics (principally ICE and
chloroform) , and inorganics (nitrates and sulfates). Present
contamination levels are above drinking water standards, which prevents
use of the affected portion of the aquifer as a potable water source.
Zone 4 is densely populated. Contaminated groundwater from this zone is
designated as Stream D.
Six major alternatives have been identified to address these zones of
contamination. Brief descriptions of the remedial alternatives evaluated in
the FS are provided below, with additional information in Attachment 2. In
the draft FS, these remedial alternatives (RA) are numbered 2, 3, 4A, 4B, and
5. The preferred alternative, RA 6, is not identified separately in the draft
FS, but contains elements of the other alternatives.
RA 1, is the no-action alternative and would discontinue on-site and mid-
canyon groundwater extraction and treatment that is presently performed. This
RA did not undergo detailed evaluation in the FS since it did not protect
3
human health and the environment nor meet many of the other criteria
established for cleanup of the Superfund site. �.✓
The remaining RAs focus on the remedial actions proposed for Zone 1, the on-
site area. Table 1 briefly describes each of the remaining remedial
alternatives.
TABLE 1
DESCRIPTION OF REMAINING REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
Remedial
Alternative Description
No. 2 Natural flushing of the on-site area and
downgradient plume cleanup.
No. 3 On-site dewatering, extraction, and
treatment of on-site leachate, and
downgradient plume cleanup.
No. 4A On-site dewatering, extraction, and
treatment of on-site leachate, in situ
soil-gas extraction, in situ soil
flushing, and downgradient plume cleanup.
No. 4B On-site dewatering, extraction, and
treatment of on-site leachate, in situ
soil-gas extraction, selective soil
excavation of higher contamination areas,
soil treatment and redisposal on-site, in
situ soil flushing, and downgradient plume
cleanup.
No. 5 On-site dewatering, extraction, and
treatment of on-site leachate, full
excavation of all diggable soil, soil
treatment followed by redisposal on-site
into the excavation, and downgradient
plume cleanup.
No. 6 On-site dewatering with extraction and
treatment of on-site leachate, in situ
soil-gas extraction, treatability studies,
and downgradient plume cleanup.
4 �..�
Common to all the remaining RAs, including the preferred alterative, RA 6, are
the continuation of the existing and planned groundwater management activities
for Zones 2, 3, and 4 that were initiated through earlier clean-up actions.
These actions include:
0 The continued operation of the mid-canyon extraction well system
and pretreatment plant, and disposal of the treated effluent to
the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) industrial sewer line
for additional treatment at a publicly-owned treatment works
(POTW), i.e., the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County.
o The construction and operation of the lower canyon extraction well
system, and treatment of the extracted groundwater at the mid-
canyon pretreatment plant.
0 The construction and operation of an extraction well system and
treatment system in the community area, south of Highway 60..
o Disposal options for the treated water from the lower canyon and
community well systems include discharge to the SARI line and the
Districts or to the local agency for treatment and reclamation in
Riverside County. The long-term plan is to reinject the treated
water to flush the soil and remove the pollutants. The flushing
will accelerate the soil clean-up process.
RA 2 depends on the natural flushing of the site and uses the existing and
some new extraction wells to remove the water-soluble contaminants over a long
time period. RAs 3, 4A, 4B, 5, and 6 all include on-site dewatering,
extraction, and treatment of on-site leachate through the existing
pretreatment system, and attempting to isolate the contaminated soils from
coming in contact with uncontaminated ground and surface water.
RAs 4A and 4B involve in situ methods of removing volatile organic
contaminants by evacuating the soil and condensing the organic vapors. Both
of these RAs also include using treated groundwater to wash the contaminated
soil and remove soluble contaminants. RA 46 includes selective soil
excavation of identified "hot spots".
Besides on-site dewatering, extraction and treatment of on-site leachate, RA 5
includes excavation of all diggable soil, the treatment of same to immobilize
the pollutants, and then redisposal on-site. This alternative would leave
residual contamination on-site in the decomposed granite and bedrock so that
it would still be necessary to continue groundwater extraction and treatment
for years after excavation activities are completed.
5
DOHS PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE /
RA 6 is the preferred alternative. It comprises elements of the RAs examined
in the FS for Zone 1, the on-site area, and proposes to dewater by using
surface extraction wells, to implement soil-gas extraction if field tests
prove favorable, and to conduct concurrent treatability studies to determine
whether there is a feasible method for further addressing on-site soils and
bedrock contamination. RA 6 also proposes to continue the existing and
planned groundwater management activities for Zones 2, 3, and 4 described
above. RA6 provides for continued discharge of the treated groundwater to the
Sanitation Districts' sewerage system via SAWPA and the Santa Ana River
Interceptor sewer.
RA 6 meets all of the nine Superfund evaluation criteria and was supported by
the Glen Avon community at a public meeting covering the draft FS on September
20, 1988. Subsequent to the release of the FS, the estimated amount of
groundwater expected to be removed by the well system in the community area
was recalculated. This recalculation resulted in a much lower estimated
groundwater yield which affected the estimated costs and cleanup time that had
previously been presented. Because the level of confidence in cost estimates
is accurate within -30 to +50 percent, the estimated cost of the preferred
alternative is essentially equal to the estimated cost of the less expensive
alternative. The costs and approximate time until groundwater cleanup is
achieved for each alternative is presented in Table 2.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The EPA and DOHS have been working with the Potential Responsible Parties (PRP
- those companies identified as having disposed of hazardous wastes to the
site) to take over the removal, treatment, and disposal of the contaminated
community area groundwater. The PRPs are finalizing their plans to install
their test wells in the community of Glen Avon. Information from these tests
will lead to the design of the groundwater remediation project in the
community area south of the 60 freeway, approximately one mile south of the
site, for the extracted groundwater to be treated to the local sewering agency
requirements. This would then allow the treated wastewater to be sewered and
then after additional treatment by the Jurupa Community Sanitary District
reclaimed and used for irrigation purposes.
REF H090242.RP
6
TABLE 2
REVISED REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES ESTIMATED
COST COMPARISON - OVERALL SITE REMY
RA RA RA RA RA me
No. 2 No. 3 No. 4A No. 48 No. 5 No. 6
Approxfmate Zone 1 448 Years Never 65 Years 60 Years 63 Years a. (2) Below
Time until
Groundwater Zone 2 162 Years 162 Years 46 Years 46 Years 46 Years 46 Years
Cleanup is
Achieve91) Zone 3 40 Years 40 Years 40 Years 40 Years 40 Years 40 Years
Zone 4 25 Years 25 Years 25 years 25 Year. 25 Yeers 25 Years
Estimated
Capital Coats
(million S) 340.7 S44.2 $55.5 S253.3 3630.9 $66.7(2)
Estimated
Present North Cosbts
7%Discount Rate
(million S) $131.2 $156.2 S197.8 S392.3 $741.7 S186.0(2)
RA 6 is the DNS/EPA Preferred Alternative.
b Present worth carbines capital costs and operation processes and evaluatiae based an EPA's
and maintenerce costs. The discount rate is used to nine superfund criteria.
convert future operation and maintenance costs into (3) Capital and present worth costa shown for Us 2,
todey's dollars. cost estimates were made following 3, 4A, 48, and 5 are slightly changed fraa Nose
EPA guidelines. Actual costs cwld vary by -30 to sham in the Draft IS Report prfwrfly due to
+50 Percent. For a corplete caiparison of ronedial changes in the estimated groundwater flow rate.
alternatives, camult the Stringfellow Draft IS (4) RA 6 ..is include $5 million for evaluation of
Report or the Technical Suanery. additional soil treatment processes.
(5) All costs shown are adjusted to January 109
(1) Predicting the tive required for groundwater using a factor of 5.9% for 1985-89 based an the
cleanup is extremely difficult and existing wthods Engineering News Record construction index.
are inexact. The years should be considered as (6) At costs sawn assure the dfsposel of treated
rough estimates only, and are provided for sidmtrem s to the Sent. Are Regional Interceptor
coaparison purposes. (SARI) india[rial sewer line.
(2) Time for cleanup and estimated costs for Zace 1
may be affected by future on-site actions taken
as a result of pilot testing of soil treatment
7
` ATTACHMENT 1
NOTHERN
Stringfellow Site Plan PITAREA
MID-CANYON _ • 1
WELL NO. IW3 .:
y, - :'• 'SOUTHERN
yd - �� • PITAREA
s LOWER CANYON . • !
• • `,JI,-, WAM&FUT
• • ---MID CANYON
• LOWER CANYON
WELL NO . MW-17B
•
GLEN AVON
• `���, PYRITE
CHANNEL
COMMUNITY GLEN AVON
WELL NO. FC-211A2 ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
Figure 3-1. Location of Wells Selected as Representing Average Contaminant Concentrations for Mid-Canyon, Lower
Canyon, and Conununity.
Taken from Draft Report: Stringfellow Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study; May 30, 1986; DOHS
04 18. 90 10 : 1F AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLOW PO !
ATTACHMENT 2 Tut /01- ,
STRIN FELLOW
UPDATE
PUBLISHED BY THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS SECTION
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL DIVISION,STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
FFORUARY/MARCH 1989
DHS, EPA announce Proposed Plan to clean up Stringfellow
The California Department of Kaolin Services(DHS)and heavily contaminated groundwater present on-silo.Dewatering
the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)are proposing would be followed by Implementation of soilgae extraction, if
a cleanup plan that addresses the contamination problems field tests prove favorable,to remove volatile organic contami.
posed by the Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site. located In nants from on-site soil. In addition,treatabilily studies to deter.
Pyrite Canyon now the community of Glen Avon, in Riverside mine whether there Is a feasible method for further addressing
County,Califomla.The Proposed Plan identities the agencies' on-she soil and bedrock contamination, mold bit conducted
preferred alternative,and summarizes all alternatives for clean• concurre'tty,with dewatering and soil-gas extraction. If treata-
ing up she-relined contamination that were evaluated in the bility studies support the implementation of specific treatment
June 1988 Draft Feasibility Study(FS)Report. technologies.those technologies will be evaluated for appllca-
The Proposed Plan follows the requirements prescribed tion at the Stringfelfm Site. The agencies will use EPA's nine
under the federal Superfund program. Superhund commonly Superfund evaluation criteria(see page 15 in deciding whether
refers to the 1960 federal law called the Comprehensive to implement a particular technology.
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act RA 6 also proposes to continue the existing and planned
(CERCLA). In 1986, the Superfund Amendments and groundwater management activi les for the mid-canyon,lower
Reauthorization Act (SARA) was s;gned :nto law mod!yirg carryon,and community areas that were Initiated through ear.
CERCLA. liar cleanup actions and evaluated in the Draft FS.These are
DHS and EPA encourage the public to comment on all common to all the RAs.except the no action alternative.
dear p alternatives considered for the Stringfellow Site.
eased on any new information,or public Inpul,the agencies'
may modify the preferred alternative,or select another aftema-
lNe evaluated in the Draft FS.A copy of the Draft FS.and other Community Meeting
site-related documents are available for public review at the The public is Invited to attend an upcoming meetmg of the
repositories listed on page 10. Bidngtelbw Advisory Commmee regarding cleanup therna-
tivasfor the Stringfellow Site.
Preferred Altemative
Wednesday,March ts,laea
The praferrad alternative, although hot separately identi- 7:00.RM.
fied in the Draft FS, 'a a combination of particular elements of Stringfellow Community Information Center
9007 Women Boulevard
the remedial alternatives e by that were unity tie i in the Drag Glen Avon
FS, and suggestions made by the community during a public
meeting held on September 20, 1988.For purposes of discus.
s;or,the preferred alternative is designated as RA 6.
RA 6 proposes to dewmer the on-site area by using Public Comment Period
surface extraction wells to remove a significant portion of the February 28 to March 31, 1989
During the public comment period, you are encouraged to
comment on all the allematives evaluated to clean up the
Tits issue of the Stringfellow update serves as the official Stringlesow Silo.Comments can be submitted either orally or
DHS/EPA Proposed Plan describing the preferred ahemo in writing of the community meeting.Wrihen comments(posh
lave for dealing with Stringlel!ow Slur contamination. marked no later than March 31.lae9)can also be sent to:
iStringli Sae background information . ... . . . . . page 2
Conleminaeol summary. . , . page 3 Beth Jlnee
Summ?ry of remedial alternatives....... ......page a SWngfeOnw,Project
Protonic!�lernative California mint of Health Smlces
Evaluation cmerle . .. ....................... page 6 Toxic Substance,Control Division
preferred alternative analysis ............ page 7 400 P Street.P.O.Box 942732
Remedial alternative coal comparison........... page s Sa:Rrnenf4 U99230-7320
Cmmuniy participation . ... ...... . .......' , page 9
Fur meamfommon. ..... ............. .. . page 10 Fer assistance on preparing your comments,see page 9.
04. 18. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM:'FPC STRINGFELLOW PO i
Stringfellow Site Background Information
The Stringfellow She Is located In Pyrite Canyon one mile full-scale FS was performed to identify and evaluate allerTsr
north of Highway 60 near the ocimmunity of Glen Awn in River- tives for site cleanup.
side County, California. From 19W to 1972, the Stringfellow The RI determined that while the earlier actions helped to
Site was an authorized industries waste disposal facility.During alleviate some of the groundwater Contamination problems,
this period approximately 34 million gallons of liquid industrial they were not enough to ensure the protection of public health
wastes were disposed of at the site.Wastes primarily consisted and the environment. Scientists also determined that the vari.
of spent acids and caustles, solvents, pesticide by-products, ous chemical and physical processes that have occurred on.
metals.and other organic and morganle contaminants. site and downgradient are complex.
The combination of site operations, chemical reactions,
Contaminated Groundwater Plume he formation and off-site migration of leachate (heavily con-
Contaminated groundwater),the infiltration of clean water into the
Liquid wastes were deposited Into unlined pits located $he,surface water runoff,and the volatilization processes that
throughout the 17-acre site. Some of the wastes from these turn llquidwastes into gases,have all affected the on-site waste
ponds migrated downward and entered the groundwater sys- mass — producing heterogenously contaminated soils and
tem below the she.Clean groundwater flowing into the site area groundwater that have the potential to affect human health.
mixed with contaminants creating a plume of contaminated The Draft FS Report.which was released for public review
groundwater. Even though the ponds of chemical liquids were in June 1980.is the culmination of all previously prepared doc-
removed,the mixing of clean groundwater with residual chemi- uments.It presents detailed evaluations of five alternatives that
cal wastes In the on-site soils continues today(see page 9). address soil and groundwater contamination associated with
The concentrations of contaminants within the plume are the site and the community of Glen Avon.
dependent upon the chemical and physical interactions within
the soil and bedrock of Pyrite Canyon. The further the plume Contamination Pathways
extends to the south,the less the contamination becomes.The
plume follows the natural groundwater flow of the aquifer and There are several pathways that are associated with the
presently extends approximately 12,000 feet South-southwest release of contaminant into the the environment. Prircipai
of the site under Glen Avon(seas the map on page 3). pathways br contaminant transport are:
• Migration of residual water soluble on-site wastes down.
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study ward into the groundwater.
In 1980181,the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control • Lateral movement of contaminated groundwater down.
Board implemented an Interim Abatement Program as the first gradient through Pyrite Canyon.
phase of site closure. The program Included removal of all Other potential pathwayst. r contaminant transport are:
surface liquids, partial neutralization and capping of the , Bansport of contaminated soil by wind and surface
wastes. construction of surface water channeis, installation of
numerous groundwater extraction wells in the on-site and mid- water.
canyon areas,and construction of a clay core barrier dam and a Transport of soluble contaminant by surface water.
:sachets collection system. During the Stringfellow Site's history,all of these pathways
In 1983/114, a fast-track Remedial ImrestigationlFeasibiiity, may have contributed to the release of contaminants from the
Study(RIMS)was completed.It resulted in an interim measure site mostly downgradient through Pyrite Canyon.Past releases
involving construction and operation of the mid-canyon well of wastes from the site into Pyrite Channel are known to have
system and pretreatment plant, with disposal of the treated resulted in downgradient contamination of surface water and
effluent to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor(SARI)industnal soils. Presently, surface runoff and erosion of contaminated
sewer line !or additional treatment at a publicly-owned treat. soil is mnimal due to the preventive Interim controls it place at
ment works(POTW). the site. Also.air emissions measured from the site during the
A full-scale Stringfellow RI was cenductad to determine RI were not hazardous as defined by standards criteria and
the extent of contaminatier problems posed by the site.while a regional background levels.
Currently,the greatest risk ro the Glen Avon community is
from cor•taminated grodndwater migrating from the site into the
aquifer under Glen Avon. The contaminated groundwater
plume contains at least two organic contaminants TCE and
chloroform, and two inorganic contaminants, nitrates aril sul.
^ '. fares,that are above drinking water standards or guidelines.To
date,however.no direct oublic water Sources(private or service
_,.,..•^r'.-{+"' - wells) have been found to be contamina'.ad above drinking
' - +'•� water standards or guidelines. As an added precaution. the
State has hooked up nearly S00 Glen Avon residences t9 an
alternate water supply. "
For a look at how clean water becomes
contaminated see page 9.
Shcwn above is the on-site area(Zone 1)a the SMngfellow Site.
e
04: 18.. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLOW P02
Stringfellow Site Plan
NAPXGw �•
uazxD , aGrwwP
vw!
°'i'a'r°a'uurAO.lfu'ino
p ♦ � .,muryav
♦ p N°MM4uTlN G' tVV.rnr y �wur t SbiF/
p wG.n.,...N..x../•e.0 m a 8iF °G
�•+ �� io.rGu.mx Ra
S a,,�p Fr oLaNt� a<�e G P• mv[t
`'27 9 O ilONF]I PW°OE[D OPOVNOwwTEv[.inGCnON
• p PND Pl11WECi10N W6LL 6V6®E'M
gyp, aVF!VN�'
vw. i
.p IW ee•� 4i • NIpN °
a ftENEYEGNY • s
• G LMWG - ..
e a•°p.K il��l C
The large map shows the plume of contaminated groundwater that exrands from We St.—ngreliav Sao inro Glen Aran.morw(mv and extraction
waIft and me Efimerent geographic zones of the site Also shown is the area where me Laver Carryon Groundwater Extraction S}S. 's cumenify
being consmroed. The inset map shows possible iocadons of exrlaCdon and rerf?Ctiorn wells met wN comprfss,trip Community GrotindWato
Exmacrfcn System south of Highway 600 Glen Avon.
Contamination Summary
Areas of the Stringfellow Site and the community of Glen Zone 3: Lower Canyon Area
Avon are designated as specific geographic zones (see map The lower canyon zone extends from the mid-canyon
above). Descriptions below briefly summarize the location and extraction wells southwaro to the lower canyon (freeway)
contamination problems of each zone. groundwater extraction system that is being constructed
Zone 1:On-site/Upper Mid-Canyon Area across the plume just north of Highway 60.This zone contains
low to moderate groundwater contamination. Contaminants
The or sitetupper mid-canyon mine includes the original primarily consist of mobile, volatle organics (principally TCE
disposal area consisting of approximately 17 acres in the nonh- and chloroform)and inorganic sulfate and nitrate compounds.
ern area of Pyrite Canyon southward to an imaginary line about No surface soil or surface water contamination related to the
600 feet south of the subsurface barrier wall. On-site ground- Stringfellow Site was found in this zone during the Remedial
water is heavily contaminated with a large number of organic Investigation. Zone 3 contains one private residence, two
and inorganic contaminants including heavy metals. Zone f active business concerns iexcluding the rock quarry). and
has no esieential or cemmercial population. Contaminated other privately-owned land. Contaminated groundwater from
groundwater from this zone is designated as Stream A. this zone is designated as Stream C.
Zone 2: Mid-carryon Area Zone 4:Glen Avon Community
The mid-canyon zone encompasses the portion of Pyrite The community zone includes the area tram Highway 60
Canyon the!extends from the soulhem edge of Zone 1 south- southward to the southernmost edges of the plume of contsmi-
wam to the existing set of mid-canyai extraction wells. This nated groundwater stemming from the Stringfellow Site.
-one contains a moderately to heavily contaminated ground- Groundwater contamination is the only known present impact
� talr plume but no Identified slWrelated soil contamination. from the site.and is restricted to low levels of a small number of
"Rha major comaminairs are water solubie consisting primarily mobile,volatile organics(principally TCE and chloroform).and
of mobile. volatile organics (principally TOE and chloroform) inorgari frifrates and sulfates).Present contamination levels
and inorganics initiates and sulfates). The groundwater oon. are above drinking water standards,which prevents use of the
tains virtually no heavy metals.Zone 2 has no residential popu- affected portion of the acluder as a potable water source.Zone
lahon and very limited commercial use.Contaminated ground- 4 is densely populated. Contaminated groundwater from this
water from this zone Is designated as Stream a zone is designated as Stream 0.
a
04. 18. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLOW P08
Summary of Remedial Alternatives
Brief tlsacdptions of the romadinl alternatives evaluated In • The Construction and operation of the lower canyon
the Stringfellow Draft Feasibility Study (FS) Report are pro- extraction wall system,and treatment of the extracted ground-
vldod below. In the Draft FS these remedial aftemetives(RAS) water at the mid-canyon pretreatment plant.
arenumbeted2,3,4A,48,and5. Some of the alternatives use • The construction and operation of an extraction and
many of the same technologies. The preferred altematNe RA reinfection well system In the community area, seulh of High-
. 6. although not Identified separately In the Draft FS, Contains way 60.
elements of the other alternatives,end Is based upon avallable The summary of the remaining RAS, therefore,will focus
information and public comment. on the remedial actions proposed for Zone 1,the on-site area.
RA 1,the no action alternative, would involve discontinu-
ing on-site(Stream Al and mid-canyon(Stream 8)groundwater
extraction end treatment that is presently performed. Also,
there would be no effort to:minimize the generation of contami- Remedial Alternative
nated leschate from the on-site area;or to clean up or stop the Natural flushing of the on-she area and downgradlent
further migration of the downgradient plume. plume cleanup.
This RA did not undergo detailed evaluation in the FS Improved surface water drainage controls, a multitayered
since it does not protect human health end the environment. Cot, and some new extraction wells near the barrier dam would
nor attain legally applicable or relevant and appropriate be Installed.No other new measures would be taken to mini-
requirements(ARARs)of federal and state public health and mize the future generation of contaminated groundwater at the
envimnmental laws.Additionally,this RA does not achieve any Site. Water that percolates into the ground further up Canyon
reduction in ihetoxicity,mobility,or volume of the contaminants (upgradient) from the site ultimately passes through the oon-
present at the Stringfellow She. taminated onsile material and mixes with leachers (heavily
Common to all the remaining RAs,including the preferred contaminated groundwater). Groundwater is allowed to
alternative RA 6, are the continuation of the existing and become contaminated making the extraction welts near the
planned groundwater management activities for Zones 2, 31 barrier dam and in the mid-canyon responsible for intercepting
and 4 that were initiated thmugh earlier clean-up actions, and removing Contaminated groundwater for the foreseeable
These scions Include: future. The natural flushing action would eventually remove
• The continued operation of the mid-canyon extraction water Soluble Contaminants over a long lime perlod-
well system and pretreatment plant•and disposal of the treated Zone 1 —ma-or on-site actions:
effluent to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor(SARI)industrial 1
sewer Ilia for additional treatment at a publicly-owned treat- • Construction of surface water drainage cnanuels at the
marl works(POTW). north and south ends of the site.
On-Site Dewatering
0C.TIAIN we„e
' ON.titli .
0
o
c
d a saeerweo
gxn €iu�ion - W:.
wneane
o.•a.,i,s
wnu
Shown here is one scheme forlboaling surface-eesedgmunowareremaixMn walls,^.eftl that wrticompriso the on-sire dewatering(gmune
,vale,removal!system. welts installed on me sire's sumac•(fight,will extend into the ground below the current water level. As woes of
dniteo.mB holes are encased will)p/ping filet has a screened section A"the bottom of the pipe. Pumps in the wolAs will draw,the water
idownwardink,me scrosnedsecdon ofmi;welimnn upwam mmugh me pipe:oholding tanks on the surface lors"ge prior to treatment
Th.'s process wet gradvalh/lower me water table and remove a ognilicant pardon of tiro onsim ContaminahM groundwater RamOVlmg this
water w,a sudirdeney dry out me sae so Soll-gas extraction operedcns and sal frestabrk'ry Costs can be conducted.
I
A
04, 18,. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLGW P03
a Regrading of the on.she surface,Installation of a multi- Remedial Alternative 48
layered cap and Improved on-site surface drainage.
• Continued extraction of Stream A leachate in the vicin- On site dewatering, extraction and treatment of on-site
�a../ity of thebarrierdam. laschate, In-situ solbgee extraction, selective sell excava-
• Inslellstien of additional leachate extraction wells in the lion of higher contamination areas, soil treatment and
gravel drain just north of the subsurface barrier wall redispo uil on-alle, irrslfu soil flushing, and downgrddient
plume cleanup.
This remedial alternative I$Similar to RA 4A except that it
incorpondu a selective excavation of identified "hot spots"
Remedial Alternative 3 and treatment action between soll-gas extraction and soil flush-
ing. Removing a portion of the contaminated on-she soil mass
0"ita dewatering, extraction and treatment of on-she should result in a slightly shorter flushing time,and would also
leaehato,and downgredient plume cleanup require treatment of a smaller amount of contaminated water
RA 3 would involve dewatering to lower the water table in than RA 4A. bewatering, soil-gas extraction, and soil Flushing
the o"Ite area(Zone 1)largely to Isolate the contaminants in would be conducted in the same manner as in RA 4A.
the soil from the natural groundwater flow. Initial dewatering Zone t —major on-site actions:
would remove a significant portion of the existing on-sae water
soluble contamination mass.Although this remedial alternative • Construction of surface water drainage channels at the
would leave contaminated soils and materials in place, it north and south ends of the site.
attempts to isolate them from coming in contact with uncon. • Initial dewatering of the on-site area, and treatment of
laminated ground and surface water. Improved surface water the extracted water at the pretreatment plant.
drainage controls and a new multilayered cap would minimize • Implementation of soil-gas extraction in the on-site
future percolation of surface water into the site. area,it field tests prove favorable.
• Excavation and treatment of soil from areas of higher
Zone 1 —major on-site action: contamination(hot spots)and redisposal ors-site.
• Constructldn of surface water drainage channels at the • After wil-gas extraction,implementation of soil flushing
north and south ends of the she. using treated water to Hush out remaining water soluble
a Initial dewatering of the on-sae area, and treatment of contaminants.
the extracted water at the pretreatment plant. • Continued operation of the dewatering system to
• Continued operation of the dewatering system and remove flushing water and treatment of the extracted water at
treatment of the extracted water at the pretreatment plant. the pretreatment plant.
• Regrading of the o"ite surface, installation of a multi- • Installation of a multilayered cap.
layered cap,and improved on-site surface drainage.
Remedial Alternative 5
Remedial Alternative 4A On-site dewatering, extraction and treatment of on-site
loachate, Pull excavation of all diggable wit,snit treatment
On-site dewatering, extraction and treatment of on-stte followed by redlsposal on-site into the excavation, and
feachate, In-situ soil-gee extraction. in-shu SON flushing, downgradient plume cleanup.
and downgradient plume cleanup. Full excavation would include removal of the On-stte cap,
After initial dewatering, in-situ actions of this remedial soil in the alluvium layer,diggable,(removable without blasting)
alternative would accelerate cleanup in the on-sxe and mid- decomposed granite and rock, and wit from the sides of the
canyon areas. Soil-gas extraction,if field tests prove favorable, on-site area. Excavation would also include the upper mid-
would remove volatile organic contaminants (primarily TCE) canyon area south of the subsurface barrier wall and possibly
from contaminated soils, while flushing of the wit with dean the barrier wall itself. Since it is of possible to remove all
water would..remove water soluble organics and inorganics. diggable material at once, a continuous cycle at excavation.
The dewatering system would also function m the collection treatment and redisposal,with appropriate stockpiling prior:o
system for flushed out water. and after treatment would occur. RA 5 would leave residual
Zone 1 —major on-site actions: contamination on-site in the decomposed granite and bedrock
] below the excavation limits, So it would be necessary to con,
• Construction of surface water drainage channels at the tine groundwater mn.clion and treatment for years after
north and South ends of the site. excavation activities are completed.Dewatering woulo be con.
• Initial dewatering of the on-site area, and treatment of ducted in the same manner as in RA 3.
the extracted water at the pretreatment plant. Or 1 —ma
• Implementation of scii-gas extraction In the on-site Zone ] on-site actions:
area,if field tests prove favorable. • Construction,of surface water drainage channels at the
• After soil-gas extraction.implementation of wit flushing north and south ends of the site.
sing treated water to Rush out remaining water soluble a Initial dewatering of the on-site area, and treatment of
,,�ntaminants. the extracted water attire pretreatment plant.
• Continued operation of the dewatering system to a Excavation and treatment of diggable contaminated
remove flushing water and treatment of the extracted water at material followed by redisposal on-site.
the pretreatment want. • Continued operation of the dewatering system and
0 Installation of a multilayered cap. treatment of the extracted water at the pretreatment plant.
04. 18. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLOW P09
DHS/EPA PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
Remedial Alternative 6 • Inhlal dewatering of the on-site area, and treatment of
the extracted water at the pretreatment plant.
On-site drrwatenrrg with extraction and Imertmem of on•she • Implementation of soil-gas extraction in the on-site
leachate, in-situ soil-gas extraction, tractability studies, area,if field tests prove favorable.
and downgmdlent plume cleanup. • Continued o
The preferred alternative is comprised or elements of the partition the daw aritple artl
treatment of the extracted wateerr at the pretreatment
piers.
Rep examined I1 the 5trIngon-site
ones.
RA Draft
Feasibility Study • Treatablli studies — Dunn the Implementation of
Report.For face x the on-site area, le 6 proposes to dowatercoon N 9 P
by using surface extraction wells,implement soil-gas extraction dewatering andwiigae exlrecllon,potential treatment techrtol•
if field tests prove favorable,and conduct concurrent treatablllty, ogles for application to the on-site contaminated soils will be
studies to determine whether there Is a feasible method for further examined. Potential studies may include sail washing,
further addressing on-site soil and bedrock contamination.RA vitrification, wit flushing, and possibly others. If tmatability
6 also proposes to continue the existing and planned ground- studies support the implementation of specific treatment tech-
water management activities for Zones 2,3,and 4. nologres, they will be evaluated for application at the String-
fellow Site.The agencies will use EPAI;nine Supertund evalua•
Zone 1 —major on-site actions: llon criteria In deciding whether to implement a particular
• Construction of surface drainage channels at the north technology.
and South ends of the site. • Installation of a multilayered cap.
Superfund Evaluation Criteria
Overall objectives for cleanup of the StringMlow Site Short-term effectiveness involves the timeframe
and associated groundwater contamination are guided by needed to achieve protection from any adverse impacts on
the requirements of the federal Supertund law Supertund human health and the environment that maybe posed dux-
ing the construction and implementation period until clean-
requires that all potential clean-up alternatives be analyzed
relative to nine evaluation criteria and that the preferred up goals am achieved.
alternative meet the four Supertund statutory requirements Long-term effectiveness and permanence Were to
that are derived from these criteria.The chart below lists the the ability of a remedial alternative to maintain protection of
nine criteria(left)and the four statutorymquirements(right). human health and the environment over time once clean-up
Brief explanations of the nine crtena follow goals have been met.
MptNTgN Oi MN6 Psoncnon or,mac Reduction of toxicity, mobifity or voWme (TMV)
ATTAWMmT Or 11Ye. ATTAINWNT or A.AA. stars to the anticipated performance of the treatment tech.
nologies a remedial ahemalive may employ
Implei rr10.TTarrx a'ICRIVCRl9
ca�u,Tw...r.crrvaara efeasreity of try refers to the technical and atlmy of
Tox.cm.rows, trateri feasibility and s services
a remedy, including the availability n
wurr.xeovcnoa coanerremrvenees materials and ServiC83 needed t0 implement the chosen
,r.uArxTAwry uracnnae OF PIMA- solution.
j en sowtwrs Axo
i.'IATME To e
coal r ran'r o ENT m Coot evaluates the estimated capital and present worth
i mxcrx:Aeu!r mar; costs of each altern ative.Present worth costs inci ude capital
ru,PPc.r Aaeaer AeeertAirce P
coats and annual operation and maintenance costs over the
corrurmr AccsvrAxes I life of an alternative in today's dollars.
Overall protection of human health and the emri on. State (support agency) acceptance indicates
ment(HHaE)addresses whether or not a clean-up remedy whether, based on its review of the RI/FS and the Proposed
provides adequate protection and describes how risks are Plan,the State conours with.opposes, or has ne comment
eliminated, reduced or controlled through treatment. engi- on the preferred alternative.
nearing controls,or institutions]controls. Community acceptance indicates if community con•
Compliance with ARARS addresses whether or not a earns are addressed by the preferred aflems",re and it th
clean-up remedy unit meet all of the applicable or relevant community has a preference for a particular mmed
and appropriate requirements of state and tederal environ• Although public comment is an important part of the final
mental laws and regulations or other environmental star- decision. EPA is compelled by law to balance community
`. utes,andlor provide grounds for Invoking a waiver. concerns with all of the previously mentioned entails.
I
e
04. 18. 90 1 0 : 15 AM * CDMiFPC STRINGFELLQW P05
RA B ANALYSIS
Preferred alternative meets the nine Superfund
evaluation criteria
Overall objectives for cleanup of the Stringfellow Site and If troatability studies support the implomontation of specific
associated groundwater contamination are guided by the treatment technologies,they will be evaluated for application at
requirements of the federal SupwilUnd law.Supedund requires the Stringfellow Site,based on EPAs nine criteria,
that all potential clean-up alternath es be analyzed relative to
nine evaluation criteria and that ere preferred alternative meet Reduction of toxicity, mobility or volume
four statutory requirements that are derived Irom these criteria
(sea box page 6). This approach is designed to provide deci- (TMV)
sionervirere with sufficient information to adequately compare The groundwater extraction and treatment elements for
the alternatives,select a preferred alternative.and safisty legal Zones 2,3,and 4 of each remedial alternative examined In the
requirements. FS will reduce the toxicity,mobility or wiume(TMV)of contami
Summarized below ;s the performance of the preferred nation.The preferred alternative.RA 6,would also reduce TMV
aternative against the nine criteria in comparison to the other in Zone 1 es ful. ring and soil-gas extrec;ion if Feld tests
alternatives.It is anticipated that the preferred alternative wilC Drove successful.
• Protect human health and the environment;
• Comply with applicable or relevant and appropriate Short-term effectiveness
requirements(ARARs); Risks associated with implementation of each element of
• Be cost-effective; all RAs can be addressed with various engineering commis
xi-
• Use permanent
solutions and alternative treatment and standard health and safety protection g
technologies or resource recovery technologies to the ma
mum axiom practicable(MEP).
Imps@mentability
Overall protection of human health and RAs 2 3, and 4A are constructible and would use Stan.
the environment card construction practices.RAs 4B and 5 present the greatest
design,logistical and Implementation problems outs to the vast
All of the RAs,with the exception of the no action alterna- quantity of on-site contaminated sod and waste requiring exca-
tive(RA 1),would provide adequate protection of human health vatlon and handling.The preferred alternative, RA 5, includes
and the environment by eliminating, reducing or controlling the constructible elements of RA 4A
contamination risks through treatment, engineering controls,
or Institutional controls. The preferred alternative would: Cost
the volume of contaminated water through surface
water controls;lower the on-SRO water table and further reduce There are no costs for RA 1, the no action alternative.
the volume of contaminated groundwater through dewatering; Capital and present worth costs are shown in the box on page
reduce the risk from exposure to volatile organics through scrF B.Present worth costs were calculated at fbe 7?5 discount rate.
gas extraction; and further examine possible sell treatment Also listed are the estimated groundwater cleanup times for all
options to assess their applicability to clean up on-site soils. site zones.
Compliance with ARARs State(support agency) acceptance
All the RAs examined In the FS.with the exception of the The State of California supports the preferred alternative.
no action alternative and the proposed actions of RA 3 for Zone
1, would attain chemical-specific ARARs. The preferred after- t.'OmmUnl acceptance
native,RA 6.would achieve ARARs for Zones 2, 3, and 4 and C�
would examine the feasibility of implementing strategies to The preferred alternative was supported by repnesenta-
accelerate the attainment of ARARs for Zone 1. fives of the Glen Awn community at a public meeting covering
the Draft FS held on September 20, 19M.Community accep-
t ong-term effectiveness and permanence Lance of the preferred plan will be further assessed in the
Record of Decision (ROD), !blowing a review of public com-
ments received on the Stringfellow Draft FS Report and the
wells Mr on-site dawatenng. All technical components for Proposed Plan.
extracti re ng and treating groundwater a reliable proven tech-
nologiss. if mechanical components fail they can be quickly
repaired No major problems with existing extracton wells have
occurred and the Stringfellow pretreatment plant has met all
permit requirements for contaminated groundwater treatment.
04. 18. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM/FPC STRINGFELLOW P10
REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES ESTIMATED COST COMPARISON
RA RA RA RA RA RA
No,2 No.3 No.4A Na 48 No.5 No.6
Appmxlmate Zone 448 years Never 62years 55 years 63 years see(2)below
Time Until Zone 162years 182 years 46 years 48 years. 46 years 48 years
Groundwater
Cleanup Is Zone 40 years 40 years 40 years 40 years 40 yam 40 years
Achlfyiledf'f
Zone 4 25 years 25 years 26yeers 25 years 26 years 25 ysers
Estimated
capltal Coals(million t1l) 40.3 46.0 55.8 244.0 620.8 64.2m
Estimated
Present Word Coats
7%Discount Rate(million 111) 129.6 .162.7 203.6 388.2 730.6 166.9m
Present worth combines capital costs and operation and based on EPA%nine Supedund criteria.
maintenance Costs. The discount rate Ia used to convert (3) Capital and present worth costs shown for RAs 2,3,4A,
future operation and maintenance costs into today's dollars. 48,and 5 are slightly changed from those shown in the
Cost estimates were made following EPA guidelines so call- Draft FB,Report due to changes in the estimated
mated costs could vary by —30 or +5o percent.For a com- groundwater flow rate.
plate comparison of remedial alternatives consult the String. (4) RA 6 costs Include$5 million for evaluation of additional
fallow Draft FS Report or the Technical Summary. soil treatment processes.
(1) Predicting the time required for groundwater cleanup is (5) All costs shown are adjusted to January 1989 using a .I
extrerrelydlNicull and existing methods are Inexact.The factor of 5.901e for 19W89 based on the Engineering
years should be considered as rough esflitales Only. News Record construction index.
and are provided for comparison purposes. (6) All costs shown assume the disposal of treated side
(2) Time forcleanup and estimated costs forgone l maybe streams to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI)
affected by future on-site actions taken as a result of pilot industrial sewer line.
testing of soll treatment processes and evaluations
Relationship of this Proposed Plan/Preferred Alternative
to other Stringfellow Site clean-up actions
The purpose of this proposed plan Decision (ROO) on July 18. 1984, that ation of a well system to extract comaml.
is to address the overall clean-up strat- selected an interim measure to extract, mated groundwater from the lower
egy at the Stringfellow Sltecomprehen- treat, and dispose of contaminated canyon area for treatment at the mid-
sively, by proposing to continue the groundwater from the on-site and mid- canyon pretreatment pfant. Construc.
existing and planned groundwater man- canyon areas. The Interim measure tion activities have been initiated, and
agemerf aclivitles initiated through the included the construction and operation are expected to be completed later this
agencies'earlier actions and to remedi- of a mid-canyon wall system and pre- year.
ate the contamination in the on-site treatment plant, and diaposai of the • On June 30, 1988, OHS and
area. treated effluent to the Santa Ana EPA proposed a plan for construction
Earlier actions to address the Regional Interceptor (SARI) industrial and operation of a well system to extrac
cleanup of the Stringfellow Site Indutle sewer Ilne Icr adtllllonal treatment at a and treat S1ringtellow-related conlar
the following: publicly-owned treatment works mated groundwater from the commuri
(PO TM area-Under this proposal,treated water
• Based on a 19B3184 fast-track would be reinjected into the community
Remedial investigationlFeasibility • On June 24, 1987. EPA issued aquifer.A ROD is expected to be issued
Study(RIP-S), EPA'ssued a Record of another ROD for construction and oper. in the near future.
B
04. 18. 90 10 : 15 AM * CDM FPC STRINGFELLOW ? O6
Stringfellow Site Community Participation
OHS and EPA have received comments from the commu- The Committee Is made up of community participants,
hilt'on both the SMngfellow Remedial Investigation (RI) and elected representatives. and Ideal. state and Were] officials
Draft Feasibility Study (FS) Reports. In addition, Comments that meet monthly in Glen Awn to review Stringfellow Site pro-
have been received on the June 19W Proposed Plan for Con. gross and provide input to project staff.
:aminated Groundwater Cleanup In Glen Awn,south of High- Written comments (postmarked no later than March 31,
way 60. Many of these comments have been incorporated by 1989)can be sent to:
OHS and EPA into the preferred alternative. Beth Jlnes
Stringfellow Project
Public comment period California Department of Health Services
Toxic Substances Control Division
The agencies encourage the public to review, and com. 400 P Street,P.O. Box 942732
ment on the preferred clean-up alternative(RA 6), as wall as Sacramento,CA 94234.7320
the dfier clean-up alternatives, evaluated for the Stringfellow (916)327-0979
Site.The public Comment period,which rune from February 28
to March 31. 1989, is your formal opportunity to participate in Making effective community comments
the remedy selection process.
Based on any new information or public input, the agen- To most effectively comment,the public is encouraged to
pies' may modify the preferred alternative or select another state Is support or opposition for a particular alternative If
alternative evaluated in the Draft FS. possible. it is best to comment on all the alternatives. When
The public will have the opportunity to provide its com- judging an alternative, Consider the nine evaluation Chalons
ments regarding the Proposed Plan and other clean-up alter- described on page 6. When commenting you should be spe-
relives evaluated M the Stringfellow Site. Comments can W ci6c on how you feel a particular alternative does or does not
submitted either orally or in writing to OHS ano EPA officials at adequa-.ely address an issue Comments will be used to pre,
the: pare the ROD that will formally detail DHSIEPA plans for
addressing contamination at the Stringfellow Site,
Stringfellow Advisory Committeecommunity,Meeting For more detailed information on the Stringfellow Site —
Wednesday,March 15, 1989 particularly the FS Report that has complete descriptions of all
7;00 P.M. the remedial alternatives,as well as Copies of all RIIFS nepons
Stringfellow Community Information Center and other background materials—visit the information reposi.
9007 Mission Boulevard,Glen Awn tories listed on page 10.
Formation of Contaminated Groundwater
FMMeR WAsn
oiarw/ rann
........ w'W rah
Ili
i , TMNDwA1aR
FlLL :.' TAM
i y
• 14 1UM nit! i FlLL �: •ALW
'NO fa WUM AND L AND FILL
D
Posse awman t - —
Dowr7wARe
1OODANY POf.N MiOMT10N
aeDRotlr OOwNO GROUNOWATER
WATiR—OMNITE FLOW
•fOMf O/CdVTAM:NATIe JOKJ
Thar artrt tendering(roe)depkts whate residual wastes horn former waste disposalpa+dr Jm IncarPd faPtmum and 4li layers in ,la`cn!^
me gmundwale,rable NnC die vithour star,dl subsurfaM sell and rock at fMa SnjMJ/aliow Sim ,(S Clean 4Ur/aCY wa1P'and gr^undWJMf
(dght)mete into the aliuy(unn and lea layer JnS clean"far mlyes with residual wastes beco-ning corfaminaW lomung rfe dayngnd o.,n
prune of: ntaminatcdgmund"uh, the plump is the key pathway of contaminant mignnon from me SeingfWw See. The asap on page 3
shows the entire plume.
9
STRINGFELLOW
UPDATE
PUBLISHED BY THE COMMUNI y RELATIONSSECTION
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL DNISION,STATE DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH SERVICES
APRILISS9 a FACTSHEET
DHS, EPA Revise Estimated Cleanup Costs
Purpose theesdnd dcoe c uptlmaroarhatlbeenpresanbtl
in me Community Groundwater Proposed Plan. In sodNan,
The purpose of des fech Meet b to rally you Net me conaln miler rout ad uslens rs were madd to toe emlmeled
Caftrin a Department of Heath Serness(DHS)and tie U.S. ced WMPaz presented in Ne Pomp Site Remedy Pm-
Emiranmenbl Protection Agency(EPA),in respores b pumic posetl Plan.
request,are annealing Me mmmem paned for Me Overall Site
Remedy Proposed Plan Net was released as the Feeluvy/
March 1988SMglabow upped,In addition,DHS and EPA are REVISED ESTIMATED COMMUNITY
offering an opportunity mcommant on Me Agenme5 revised GROUNDWATER CLEANUP COST COMPARISON
re Overall
dsenw met Propvtsore whits were Community
o unm sired
Mereundwa Sib Remedy Proposed was elMfe@es Me
tin
Groundwater Proposed Plan Nat was rseasatl n toe Jurrel omp fro as�n
Jmyistastriglefew Upoata, psi tsem memavm slam sum,
A forms comment pahed for the reread estimated cost
compatscra b ret requeed under section 1V of the Cocotte 80t meioaomws ry a as >a
herww EmmetmanW Response.Compensation and Libuctity wgrmdm
Act(CERCLA),common y referred b as Supedwtl.Hmleser,
shred the comment period for tie O,,amll Site Remedy Pro -Ifee pgv.eam :set n v w
posed Plan be being ficu nded due to public request,DHS and •awrmasmi
EPA debnMned Net soliciting for comments on me revised
eadmated cost re cperparba would rM covasety affect f •e�amm:amrsma:ots
Agencies'anticipated Sbingfelbw, e :N project schedul :�s®v�rrmer i4e a ni vs
The preferred sfenamef deeco2atl in th Commnity u a .issessuss
Groundwater and me Pretall Sib Remedy Pmposed Plane msvBk
remain to mod feasible and aaxpbde of Me nembeial star. P,y�Rg. y
naard9 lAdumed.despite t reYlWre Is N9 eMmaled WBb •feed lgae0a
anddeanuptlme ---��--' �,®�! i4• a 93 9..1
Thacommenipe dosasgn May18,1989. •idpmimnm.
m m..nv......rw.wa.mrswm.®mm�ea-m..m
Background Information OnFWsed .—•��—•d®•m�®�.•®•.m..��em
Estimated Cost Comparisons as
In me Ju ti 198E Strmgfusi Update.DHS and EPA
released a Proposed Plan to add sife+ebbd groundwater
conssminatlon in tie community of Gen Awn,scri of HigR rvvowcu...o.
way W.In me Febrray/Murch 19995aNgfepwv upside,DHS
anti EPA released a second Proposed Plan to comprehmt-
siwly address the ovardlcieanupstretegyldTtSbtngfellow How Have The Estimated Cost
Sim Subsequent be ore release of me Community Gmi Comparisons Changed?
water Proposed Plan, and based on public comments
nararced.me aMmmstlon we ystem(sustained!
s staine!yx4in be Community
Gmdtenge tame mm Plan
fees
table
coreradry nee iu;recnwellsystem(sudssetlyl rein Me in Community Greueepref Preposetl Plan (see ebb
commu much
area was recalculated.Tab r yield nnen resulted able)b Nat tie Agendas'prefes,s ch as Ma s no longer
In a routs rower esnmded groundwater yield wniM affected me leas[shout detailed
Cod estimates ng at Hasa worm are
made without detailed engineering date, are normally
mmected to M I"ofts whin -. a sti tartans Thera
ere,given Nis level al confitlence,Me estitnatstl cost of Ina
Summary of Remedial Alternatives of amen wa equat to me estmated cos
Ra:e,rumiremedee E: Nmu:.l gesti:g prdm mmsiaweodtlwm MomaM linetpme Cmmmuect Ground imer(Years i-
gaEievtplwvecleamq, son table is ere incnahmm estimated cleanup time(Years of
RerveNal Atamvdeel:Oo-s'vedevaredvg.caamnaeduommof Operation andOccur).
Meinbnenee) for each remedial sbmadue
oo-lia M"•, evadwegM'rm gomerlmuR (bpe8n yijvsdOmWrrtat Ss cleanup tene estimate is npetledtpbe Mm byloe
RemWel NlmpWwiA: oo-sia dewer<ridg,e¢ 'ov Wrmawem
ofoo-sia IaeM1ue,imsim xoilgmmzdan,imwxoa dusbinH, Hweattraction eeti caniched cleanup
al reb.
amAfteme a•mqum ut, uv. Hmwwp me aster Men cleanup time pl me preferred s adwe
RmeEW AhrmeiPhri Omsia- ucnvg.uorlion un i . ueng dsre fasts than coal of me lead edpareiw for(Si
ofu.fh lhir io-simion iJ mn.xkni ws'ii w- using dispose fi e, Santa Ara Regional Inbrcepbr(SARI)
donor hri,sr cunmmi 'w dl, n iiinip [aMmaiipmd intltabial ratified e
amsi¢ina:m a:InwNog,mddomgadmm qumetlnnuP. The ratified comparisonat ebb shown10a above includes
NmNhLAltem,wif Omliatlsvaadvg,urmmioo avtl rivummar areasnt worm carubnona at ] anti 10 percent which are
she lrb, .,mal on-nit, u( fdiggeble sal.w9 demmem Mimi to Jar SARI
1989 daMon.The sr stopping cost
uary
dwraawl br mtispmal m-si:e into am unmimr.avtl dwngm- Mimi as idnecane rarrydisposal option.The sr sinpping cost
uiem ftsm mrvp, bared maynetp lowdonarymaasurebaausemithout arga
RaveEW neri dw r i triA rnetmed wore ec acre permit may net ow, i attle SARI line depose)w ality prer
n..."acing witun•mionaM:mao:em or rocks ImcamRon Insaaamended! inter meats the water qua evens me peorof me
sod-gmmrruton.aEdi:umlueamMli:yaWiesptov-sine sMl expached water meets the wabrqualily limibofihussion .
.omamiwiov.aMuomgmdim PlumeckanuR (pamdnuedan pack)
fly
Thareawe Cmude th Gme annual REVISED REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES ESTIMATED i a
table ease not Include theme annual
apereuonam melmm�aaf mnmema The COST COMPARISON—OVEMLL SITE REMEDY
numap,s ,sin enema m epmtlm aM a w w•
theim and. n ere bee m eMemm r6r ryy Iof a we
yeas and. Ima, cans be wmmel¢m m1 .. wws rw era cow. al M.
hem ameem t anath ner.Honeaen me lblba email Anew• ,alien, mews news era M.
figumb on,ed o"mt rwnn d mllsarea mall dery Wens alpe news sews alps Mns ap.
oave lBe op0retlbn a maintenance g. sews alp• sews alp. sews a.e
Ma The aPe mamd mew maaw
erM a easommm or m handful voi y�
.sv sine xr
tafcodgrc newasryiem also tleamp time samma
let.oe nammElannes mood hot W a(mteBe ^n damoa eam
Eox,For Morelnmmat l^aea a12 tars ,m eaA Nv lava
Wm m9pap of the ma mmpMmn bran.emmenaaaW,nmsmamm l eu eanl.uvm Tore en ewY nm.
aEa Mmm OvermlSRe Ramsey Papmed wmammrmmlbemwablenam —and
Flan l9eare0l99tllgml.mrminmaaehat- a^alemvse9esmenlaeemawr®a® mZal evsamdnhm. waz
merlb.amodetflatr®llmeinm/19ne aaandmeepv.m,menwarrsemss xK.aw9rLpnrybl.reearmnam
ealmalee caPdae and amen.woeh co m m mart fln mslen r�wlen�m coral o.elrue�wa mean ue
M ell me rem,mW mamatYmm Throb mvL Eaabnw.amma Ersm.9braa.e F9 1.l warbeml.ammlbm.erenam
abra dew nm ells ore maeva coal sitar- B.mmam .v9 ,amaarawmrem den
enema among ins vanoum re maa
meelel ttl ame ms°�°one m.,.saes he aa.era fa w cob amen ale.aem nemose real
a11e�gYB3 oft em 7asy®waaudes bnW mgenngaaaN4b 1at9aO .
rr.mm.a.mbamrl.ma D.o.raxamaalm,ml,mleer.
Tire olomil mv®admtenlmeei a .raw,.y.mar Pa'aa men male®ae.nammo u.apse er eeeva
wit of me mym Mangm,anee abecnP W �r.�b�1 I��yl..n•ma'e�l.ay.>
Non al me mnmafee aaetelned ®dunb ,mrreums W.olab.uW.ula 01
wafaryabaM amseupdmmencmwatbw aaienaarpubmyb remnw lass 'web»mfaaw F.Wew
ale mslaEb M ra .af th In(amaom
ominpnco head tlelaw(see Ems n
Inmrmatlon).
What Effect Do These Changes dial afameuvee"hemd.despite thereto commonly area.Ce91'is the only cftera
HahrHave On The Agencies' slaw mule mtlmaled,mina and deal _'-matwm ad mined.(Rtr a,lmcifptlnn of the
eO n heAft Agenvesl V. - nine pearls end a wmmay analysed vlry
Nitre evameem cnlaa Ma omdddl- wneachphaxwadmimammaod Fad
ThePrelorre0 enemmihmaemcn6eeln see by me Agencies in analyzing the aw"hidyg.
me Commonly GmundwmaammeOwr- mmeaieiaflemanvea Egmalmempnaie AS Mentioned idi me now min&
all Remedy Proposal Plena moment me weal,wt of noted M the namwhme m6 putt Menge of Vla estlmared cwa in in.
most aaaDle and eaeptable of the come- mead eustahal p moambr yell in the GmmunayGmmlweter Hopmed Plan h
smmmmmina9p metal l and reeb tabohlloo.eir
on co
bugseed on tee med of roammentin m.
But Eebed on the l311 of commitment Inane
FOR MORE INFORMATION cot mlimmm(-m ro iso ial .,cob
emw.ene..e.^,mW mmmaoammnox9.+o ea.^p m..rr ran woos Messes eemmatlwbwema equmm
umbmroumw+gai.amarabwtrtme men last wpensevSethechaposmMm.
co treemam fora SARI W Meaphef.The
9aa.a.aq.e use w..mwa.rmap..a mtemaual tlari time m me Pt of Me
wadaa— w. mi e^wma•aenr.wa. anemaWe remeim med) men men m ma
mew ax�s— 9mammc�uwm Mmaw.a loam wpemive mmmmva The Agenldm'
aaaaa—uara..�m me. usasle.'+^aaenmlemmsen recommelMatlon of the prmarrad afama
b Mamueu.MOOW asI®m+a.emWY^W mnT a.aeconen that he MMalgad.
.mesee.vm.l e.ueenmm.�c.rea aarrma eeneomyDm...m1 Thevvalomlomeendmeaecosom
in.Oveuml Pmpmed Plan and leas.this
eaeM1aOiYea Waimasmra .1 and do not after the health, cot
`= aa
ro�wr sah�n1i1'm �ame ,m ml9mntal alST1� me vdric. mmeded
amiA9antlm' mcanmanea
®ana�u m.iemnn� ,vie w5 Me.
Ilon of the prealmd allbineWe. RA d. Is
m1.enb.saae.ameone. ee�ew uncharged,
important m nine ma lunhar Bad
Vew Wawa® weameauurm e.mmluma wpa arm admog am moodeay m coda
u®1 mamas nmsa..n tmr,r y assess me Pme how 9usta es
CSPNe10m. 9anuol,Nu'n Met of
coma.. aaewwm yiemmmamullae The memafeegmmae-
Mannp,ura �r uvuaml baar item finm ami it me PmeMe m
deanup nmm,b111M WII eelat me tml4
meredcmm
Published by; l
TheCaruuvy RMatlons Sel non �areua
Toxic Subrmmmabs Control Dominion us 90STPGE
Stele DePamnem W HeafN$eMraa 9D
710744 P Strem.P.Q Sw 942732 uumaG
Sapanmea CA 9423b7321) wmmesa
(916)32482M
41p �. p�p
&L 93 FAA-,P/,a
STRINGFELLOW UPDATE NEWSLETTER
RESOLUTION NO.
ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE
SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL,
LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
SERVICES
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE
SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL,
LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
SERVICES
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE AND ESTABLISH THE FOLLOWING POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING,
ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT SERVICES:
Section 1: Selection of Professional Technical Consultants.
In . the selection of a firm or individual professional
technical consultant, as defined in Section 2, it is recognized
that no two individuals or firms have equal training, experience,
skill, capabilities or work loads to meet the demands of any
contemplated project.
For purposes of this Resolution, "firm" shall mean any
individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or other
legal entity permitted by law to practice the profession of
architecture, engineering, environmental services, land surveying,
or construction project management. Evaluation and selection of a
consultant firm will include but not be limited to the following:
A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional
standing, its members being of good moral character, and
it shall be prepared to submit references from persons
of known repute.
B. The principal and other responsible members of the firm
must be registered in the State of California, as
required by law.
`/ 1
C. A principal member of the firm's staff must have at least
ten years' recent experience in responsible charge of
work of the type involved in the project.
D. At least two additional members of the firm Is staff must
have at least five years' experience in responsible
charge in the field, or fields, required by the project.
E. The firm shall be capable of performing the work within
the prescribed time limitations considering the current
and planned work loads of the firm.
F. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be given
to a local based firm when more than one firm is being
considered.
G. A firm selected must certify to having an affirmative
action employment program.
Section 2: Definition of Professional Technical Consultants.
A. Professional Technical Consultants are those individuals
or firms providing engineering, architectural,
environmental or land surveying services which are those
professional services associated with research,
development, design and construction, alteration, or
repair of real property, as well as incidental services
that members of these professions and those in their
employ may logically or justifiably perform, including
studies, investigations, surveys, evaluations,
consultations, planning, programming, conceptual designs,
plans and specifications, cost estimates, inspections,
shop drawing reviews, sample recommendations, preparation
of operation and maintenance manuals, and other related
services. Services for product testing are excluded.
B. Services covered hereunder include architectural,
engineering, environmental, land surveying, construction
management and related services. .
C. A Professional Technical Consultant is an individual,
partnership or corporation (or any combination thereof)
engaged to provide services as described in Section 2.A.
Section 3 : Scone of the Protect.
A. For every project approved by the Board(s) and for which
outside services are required, the District staff shall
develop a comprehensive scope of work.
2 `a
B. The scope shall define the extent of the services, the
time required, and shall develop a maximum fee for the
services sought.
C. The maximum fee amount shall be kept confidential until
a selection has been made, but, along with the scope of
work, will be available to any Director upon request.
Section 4 : Selection of A Professional Technical Consultant.
A. Projects where services are estimated to be less than
$25,000.00.
1. Projects where the maximum professional fees are
estimated to be less than $25, 000.00 are usually
specific, small projects normally requiring
specialization in one or two fields of endeavor.
2. Staff shall consider at least three qualified firms
and shall select that firm which appears best
qualified for the project.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4.A.2, in
the event the proposed work is considered
continuation or specialized services as described
in Section 5, "Continuation of Services", or Section
6, "Specialized Services", upon written
authorization by the General Manager, negotiations
may be limited to the sole qualified firm deemed
desirable for providing said services.
4 . Negotiations for compensation for the work shall be
conducted between the firm and staff members
appointed by the General Manager, or their
designees.
5. A requisition for acquisition of services shall be
forwarded to the purchasing office listing the firms
considered, the reasons for choosing the firm
selected and shall certify that the negotiated fee
for compensation to the firm is reasonable for the
services requested and will not result in excess
profits for the firm.
6. The purchasing office shall process the requisition
in accordance with the purchasing policy established
by the Boards of Directors.
7. The evaluation of the firm's qualifications and the
fee negotiations will not be made public but will
be available to any Director upon request.
3
a . In cases where the aggregate amount of services is
expected to exceed $10, 000.00 and a project may be
funded through a federal grant program, all
applicable provisions of federal law, including but
not limited to 40 CPR, 35.937, shall apply to the
solicitation of proposals and negotiations for
professional technical consultant service.
B. Projects where services are estimated at greater than
$25, 000. 00.
1. Public Notice.
a. Appropriate public notice shall be given by
publication of a notice of request for
qualifications in professional journals or
publications of general circulation.
b. The notice shall request written statements of
qualification only.
C. As an alternative to the notice by publication,
the District shall maintain a list of firms
previously determined to be qualified based on
demonstrated competence and notice of the
request for qualifications shall be mailed to
those firms who have the capabilities and
specialization to qualify for the project.
2. Screening Committee.
A Screening Committee comprised of a minimum of
three staff members designated by the General
Manager shall select at least three firms who appear
fully and best qualified, based on demonstrated
competence, for the project.
3. Proposals.
a. Staff will prepare written requests for
proposals setting forth the scope of work and
other information necessary for the qualified
firm to properly prepare and submit a proposal.
Proposals shall be solicited from the three
firms deemed most qualified.
b. Proposals submitted shall:
(1) Acknowledge the scope of the project and
extent of the services required.
4
(2) Include a description of the firm's
`./ qualifications for performing the proposed
work, including a current financial
statement evidencing the ability to
satisfactorily perform all the items
proposed and required.
(3) In the case of a proposal for construction
management services, each firm shall
provide evidence that its personnel that
will carry out on-site responsibilities
have expertise and experience in
construction project design review and
evaluation, construction mobilization and
supervision, bid evaluation, project
scheduling, cost-benefit analysis, claims
review and negotiation, and general
management and administration of a
construction project.
(4) Include past performance records of the
firm.
(5) Demonstrate the firm's capabilities to
complete the work within the time
allotted.
( 6) Identify the specific key personnel to be
assigned to the project.
(7) Provide an estimate of the number of hours
involved in each aspect of the scope of
work for such personnel.
(8) Be accompanied by a sealed fee proposal
estimate which shall not be opened until
the firm is selected as being qualified.
Thereafter, it shall be the basis, for
procurement negotiations. The form of the
fee proposal shall be as described in
Section 6(b) and (c) below.
(9 ) Contain a conflict of interest disclaimer.
( 10) Provide any other information required to
properly evaluate the firm ' s
qualifications and familiarity with the
types of problems applicable to the
project.
5
a . Selection Committee Members.
a. Joint Works.
(1) The appointed Selection Committee for
Boards of Directors and a minimum of one
staff member appointed by the General
Manager, or their designees.
(2) At the discretion of the Joint Chairman,
additional Directors may be appointed to
the Committee to assist in the
consideration of proposals for specific
projects.
b. Individual Districts.
(1) Districts with three-member boards: The
Selection Committee of a District with a
three-member Board shall be comprised of
the Chairman of the District and a minimum
of one staff member appointed by the
General Manager, or their designees.
(2) Districts with more than a three-member
Board: The Selection Committee of a
District with more than a three-member
Board shall be comprised of the Chairman
and Chairman Pro Tem of the District and
a minimum of one staff member appointed
by the General Manager, or their
designees.
S. Review and selection.
a. The Selection Committee shall review each
proposal and the qualifications of each firm
with due consideration of office location,
reputation in the professional community,
experience, both generally and specifically on
similar-type projects financial standing,
number of qualified personnel and their
availability for the project, quality of
references, work load and other factors
relevant to the project being considered.
b. The Selection Committee, upon completion of
their evaluation of all proposals, shall
determine those firms deemed to be fully
qualified to provide the services sought by
District based on their demonstrated competence
and qualifications.
6
C. The Selection Committee, upon making a
determination of the fully qualified firms
shall open the sealed fee proposal of the
qualified firms. The Selection Committee shall
thereafter rank the firms considered, in order
of desirability, based upon the qualification
of each, as described in Paragraph 5a above,
together with the estimated fee proposal.
6. Procurement and Negotiation of Agreement.
To determine the firm to be selected and the
compensation for the services sought, the following
procedures will be strictly adhered to:
a. The Selection Committee will, at its
discretion, invite the firm that is considered
to be the best qualified to appear before the
Committee.
b. The firm shall present, in writing, to the
Selection Committee, a proposal for fees
associated with the services. The proposal for
compensation shall be presented in sufficient
detail to enable the Selection Committee to
adequately ascertain the level of effort
associated with the scope of work and to
determine whether the firm has thoroughly
identified the efforts associated with the
services and thoroughly understands the work
required.
C. The basis of the fee shall be: Cost plus a
fixed fee with a maximum amount, a per diem
rate(s) with a maximum amount, or a lump sum
(fixed) fee.
d. If it is the decision of the Selection
Committee to use methods for compensation other
than the lump sum or cost plus a fixed fee with
a maximum, or the per diem rates with a
maximum, justifications for this decision shall
be made by the Selection Committee in their
recommendation to the Board(s) of Directors for
the services.
e. The Selection Committee shall review the
compensation requested by the firm which shall
be compared with the maximum fee as previously
established.
7
f. The final negotiated fee, as recommended to the
Board(s) of Directors, shall be certified by
the Selection Committee as reasonable for the
services requested and not resulting in
excessive profits for the firm.
g. If agreement is not reached, the negotiations
should be terminated and similar interviews
should then follow with the next-ranked firm.
h. All such negotiations shall be on a strictly
confidential basis and in no case shall the
compensation discussed with one firm be
discussed with another.
Section 5: Continuation of Services.
A. In some instances where a qualified firm has
satisfactorily completed one phase in the development of
a project and the Board(s) determine that it is in the
best interests of the District(s) to retain the same firm
for subsequent phases of related work, the Selection
Committee may be authorized to proceed directly with
negotiations with that firm for the additional work.
B. This situation may arise when a firm has completed a
feasibility report or a master plan report and the
services for said work are satisfactory to the Board(s)
and the procedure of examining other firms for subsequent
phases is not deemed necessary.
C. In the event that satisfactory negotiations for price
cannot be concluded under these circumstances,
negotiations should be terminated and the provisions set
forth hereinabove for selection of a firm would apply.
Section 6: Specialized Services.
A. In the event that specialized services are -required where
it is determined that only one qualified firm can best
perform the services for a specific project, the
Selection Committee, in the case where the fees are
greater than $25,000.00, will report to the Board(s) said
findings and request authority to negotiate directly with
the particular specialized firm.
B. The basis of selection of the specialized firm or
individual, along with the negotiated fee, shall be
presented to the Board(s) of Directors for consideration.
8
Section 7: Agreement for Services.
A. Upon approval by the Board(a) for a negotiated agreement
for services, a contract shall be executed in a form
approved by the General Counsel.
B. The contract shall include:
1. A statement of the scope of the project.
2. The basis and individual elements of the fees.
3. The basis for payment to the firm.
4. The time limits in which the services must be
performed.
5. Provisions for fee adjustments should there be
changes in the scope of work.
6. If it is determined by the Selection Committee that
the Districts may be caused to incur a penalty or
liability, or suffer a loss because of the failure
of the firm to perform the work within specified
time limits, the contract shall include a clause
setting forth penalties for such nonperformance or
delayed performance, in amounts to be determined by
the Committee.
7. For projects exceeding $25,000.00 in fees, the firm
may, if determined appropriate by the Selection
Committee based on the nature and size of the
project, be required to carry errors and omissions
insurance coverage in an amount determined by the
Selection Committee to be adequate for the project.
8. Any other provisions deemed necessary or desirable.
C. Progress payments made to the firm during the time the
services are being supplied shall be based on the work
completed to date, as recommended by the responsible
staff member.
Section 8: Conflict of Interest.
A. The District(s) maintain a Conflict of Interest Code,
pursuant to California Government Code Section 87100 et
seq. , which governs the activities and performance of
duties of its officers, employees or agents in the
conduct of project work, including procurement.
`� 9
B. No Director, officer, employee or agent shall solicit or
accept rebates, kickbacks, favors or other unlawful
consideration from any individual or firm on behalf of
any firm that may be potentially selected as a qualified
firm to provide professional technical consultant
services to the District. Acceptance of food and
refreshments of nominal value on infrequent occasions
and acceptance of gratuities or gifts shall not be deemed
a violation of this provision, provided that if said
items exceed $250.00 in value, in a calendar year, the
Director, officer, employee or agent may be disqualified
from participating in the decision pursuant to Article
III of the District's Conflict of Interest Code; and,
provided further, that any Director, officer, employee
or agent, as a designated employee under the District's
Conflict of Interest Code, has reported said gifts on
his/her annual Statement of Economic Interest as required
by said Code.
Any Director, officer, employee or agent and each firm
proposing to provide professional technical consultant
services shall be bound by the provisions of the
District's Code of Ethics presently in force and effect,
and specifically but not limited to, Section 7D thereof
relating to gifts.
C. Any firm seeking selection under these procedures that
violates the District(s) Conflict of Interest Code shall
be automatically disqualified.
Section 9: Effective Dates and Revision Procedure.
A. This policy shall become effective on
B. This policy may be modified from time to time as
necessary to best meet the needs of the District(s) .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held
(B30.pj)
10 ` �
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
Ir.r�
p FUI:C ND 91TI Je PIST W0VING CAIITAL -ACCESSING DATE 4/D4/9C PAGE I
I REPORT NUMBER AF13
r-Uhl V-SAFLI1A7-1LN_IIIS TLli]iOF._DEAU GL-i0UN1.Y_-.__-.___-_.___
CLAIMS PAID n4/l1/90 POSTING OFTC 11/I1I90
x
.--LtflRLNLJI➢�_- uEYnne _-AppU", ,-, - _pee rere..nu
I P5996 ARP RENT. INC. 3187.5S INSTREIGENT PARTS
105999 AIR PRODUCTS ES C➢EA. $140.36 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
105999 SIR PRODUCTS R CHEMICAL INC. 391 p.36 PACKING MATERIALS
10fitc-I SAFETY SUPPLY AN CA $A 661.19 INSTRUMENT/SAFETY SUPPLIES
106
002 ALLSTATE1NTC INSURANCE
CO. 359.2t REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
°_.CfiOG4 ALVARADO lnapr rn_ -_ ��$139.59___.__..__,_-___-eE➢ NDUSERFEE_OVERPAYMENT__.._.....___.......
IBA004 ALMAIN MILLS. INC. 5139.22 RRAIND USER CUSS
OVERPAYMENT
G'3 lOEPOS AMER.. INST. L.A. TECH. CENTCI 3999.59 TRAINING CLASS REGISTRATION
ti-L_. .. _..__.._.._--_ __ ovmm� ..ICR7AT ROvC➢ INC. &/OR AMCRICAN SEALS i5N74.11 SEALS/GASKETS
V
1061-Rt AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY f329.3t FILM
D �ync.ipP _.peer'✓ ....ALESCEMT •
r ____S2a3.hT _-_�___-KC.PEtOL USER..FEE-0YEBPAY7ffNi_
10h910 ANAHEIM MEDICAL SQUARE, $89.01 REFUND USER ME OVERPAYMENT
m luc0ll ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $27.65/.15 SEWER REPAIRS
•Ln 1111
r.P eunPPaaw ANDS rD m_ 9675.41MEETI G EXPENSE
126 e13 FLARE P. AMDCRSOk f675.21 MEETING ALP PART
I""4 AVTH ONT•S "[CH. f NACb IMF. INC 32.E29.80 MECHANICAL PARTS
�._.1C6015___--_-AQUATIC BIO -._.-.__-.-. __.139.6L _____...-.._-__ __. TE�I SAM evavICFS__. _- -
t'c 601E INU1T iC BIOASSAY f CONSULTING f2.110.CS OCEW SAMPLL
1 OhT•17 ANAT CI SERY ICES. INC. 63.544.71 UNIFORM SERVICE
._._AP IZONAM INSTkUrc -.INSTRUMENT REPPLL-_-_.__..-_
r IGF919 ARIZ WORKS
INSTkUMEElT 5544.27 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
]DEn20 APT YOF NS f491.21 FRAMING SERVICES
-Iy_106022 OFF ENERGY
PRODUCTSR2.64 D USE
l N 106023 OFF TRANSPORT PRODUCTS CORP. f1$678.52 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
a
10EDT3 NFM TRANSPORT T DYNAMICS CORP. f6Te.52 REFUND USER P9. ,7e13rTBEXT
�_12Ar.PA Eai rnu m3pnee Prevrrr _. .__3152$15G.12GRLLECCOVALM.0.113-BB__-_ ...____. -.__.__.
lOF:25 bALLY RETAIL. INC. i15U.GV BACCVP CLAIM
n 196F26 tlAllD NOr T-YHIINEY CO. f930.6E EUBLICATION
Cf) _11_26 ._E.KTERI SCIENTIFIC
.PRODUCTS ._ __$1.246SSU4.71 .. _ _._ .._.._._..._ COB SUPPLIER
Pl-0i-l62. P2-S]-_ - .
1U6G29 BLASIU SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS f1.187.71 LAB SUPPLIES
106E29 6LA5IUS ELECTRIC TRUCK, UPC. 381.71 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
'_._-1RSL3C__.- . ..- Od1 --- --3 .36
IC6P91 PONLA0 IREEI U 357.62 PUBLICATIONS
2 HOYLC ENGINEERING COR f9B4.C3 ENGINEERING
N
--SBRV_I.__C_E S
I"-,'• BRW SALE_6_6LLGfi _ RAHLETA
106034 BON 9 IERI D➢FSULTIAA 22715. ENGINEERING SERVICES
.J--l_9
106➢35 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $1,N16.34 _MOI08
___.-I0603a _-GARY.1) GREASEEC.____.___._-__-.-__.-___..-1.318.37__ _ .. .. .___.___.._.REICT FUND USSR
BFEE OVERPAYMENT
-
IU33T f . 0 GRkP3C CSMP AkY i19164.45 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
ITF13h CFl 5164.15 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
___CAL E LS C5..11-._-_ _i .93 SEnNU 106040 CAL-CHUM SALC S56.7E HRDWARE
IU6011 CAL SOUTH EQUIPMENT CO. 3502.SL INSTRUMEN
T
E¢3E�➢YEBPeYNENT..-_. __...
CALIBRATION
_--' -..___ ._.._-__.._ ... . ............__-. .. _-. .. Y
-- - ---- - _-.. -- -_ - - --- -..._.._
( ( 1
k,
➢ FUND NO R1RR - JT 01g7 NPPIIIIA CfPITAL FROCESSIN6 DATE 41:'W9• V16E 2
.J -SPORT RUNS"
AF43
—LRCLtISANlttti8k_YI STATUSING CITE COUNTY___.___—_..—._.__._._.
' CL 4I ng FAIL N/11/-:: POSTING OAT[ .4/11/9u
]___JTAR0.ANLYO VENDOR _ ANOUNI__._..____________ DESLRLRTIDR._______-.
116142 CALTROL . INC. STI4.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
._- 10604• CALENERGY.TCOMM. our.
106044 CALIF.if. ANDE C NVALE PUN. MOST] 964.58 PUBLECATION
IC6^.45 GASP 6PPXDE CONVALESCENT POSE f612.63 BEFUNO USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
._ .__SY6T8N-MODIFMGTION6--.TELEPHONE
1CLO.7 CNTR, FOP ACvAncro roof. Div. it J9Rn + REGISTRATION
/C6U4R CENTURY SAFETY INST. B BUT$ . 1352.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES
_._f.333.2L BEPUND_USER.HE-OVBRPAYMBNT- -
D 106251 CHURCH YE CORP. 310.358.P' SEVER BEUIB S5-37-1
ERVICES
106C51 CHURCH CN 016[EPIN6. INC. 31.312.51 ENGINEERING 588VICEE 7-13
Fri l06"52 _. rn_r_c_ _ rn�. .x•- ___._-____. PONEpPAR_________ ..__.
Z 106154 CONNELL G.M.CRPARTS / OF CALIF 121.347.63$1641
PUMP PARTS
➢ 106P54 CONSELR G. PARTS / DIY. 316.0 TRUCK PUTS
.___..le6455_- CONTINENTAL+CHEPICAICLL-DJ.SIf_—___—__ ._ S5,912.T1-. -. .-_-- CHIDRINE SUPPLt-1
106056 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS [0 f5.912.P1 BLUEPINB M.0.10-II-87
IT1 I..... CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 34.140.75 RLEC RIC 9
C_3 .n-RRR ROSS C K. INC.
—. _,_$953..63-__._._. ELECTRIC PAIRSSUPPLIES --------
-_ TS 10605- BOSS COON. INC. f95J.F3 BLOWER REPAIRS ------
�p 1P6r66 COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC. SLIISJ T9.P5 ENGINES 11.0.5-13-87.6-848. J-19A
—SG3061— rouer"HOLES"' 11EL111—.—_—__ __L663.:;..._-____-____.._--g1,B6IRIG
I II60E2 RYHY SHIRTS. CRAPNELL 3357.93 BROCHURE SERVICES
➢ 106C63 CRAZY SHIRTS. INC 12.552.04 BEFORE) USER PEE OV611PAYMENT
Y--1CW6A CALe.RJIItlOOY-1113 kI.— --12�S16.75__.___— — RENTAL EQUIPMENT)-T-6-
- f— 1f6f•65 CAL Vq CR $136.T5 RENTAL EQUIPMENT -�------------ -
1.16066 LARRY CORTI TRUCK a EOUIYRCNT $22,040-1 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.4-I3-88
•._d —1• 61- •-. lE]LEM —_.__— ..__._._y265.. ----S -REGI6IRATIOE___.__ ._ _ _ __
—{ I2
6066 CHPLDYPENT DEVELOPMENT DEFT f5 Q66.9l STATE O INSUILITICE
106069 CA EMPLOYMENT OEVELOPMFNT i334.C9 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT
:..�— lGte7 � -DANIFLS1ESIARCRv.rr $736.8A_-______.
("l 15f OTl OAT4PP0 RCOCAPCH CORP. fl38 JR PUBLICATION
IC6072 OC ARTA COPEORATION $4.573.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
_.. 1__Ims?v—
1C'6P74 DIC.SOMS S133.86 ELECTRIC PARTS
306075 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $1.997.72 PRINTING
156636-- nLSLIA, rmnPMENI_CARE—__.____—___..SSAS.CO_
SLRVIC8INTENANNT--_ __
1P6CT7 DD6AD6 ENTERPRISES.ACHM INC. 125.723.64 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIR$
106E TP DUN.EL Don$, MACH MOVING 3900.14 ¢NCINE UNLOADING COSTS
STRAH. INN.._ _...._. . _.__..388.79 OFFIANICALP
106081 EL TOP IT INC. $2$766.35 RAPINE SUPPLIES
146081 EL TRP1T0 GRILL 1545-t5 REFUND PEER FEE OVERPAY!@![
3060RR --___ _.JEFF DNNEN U L_flE3OU8[[. ASSOC.._-__.__. _- -1645.CC ._._ -_.- _____ -MILEAGPPLI¢5----
1E60P3 JIFF EEx si?I.!6 MILEAGE
1661 Pi "R FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. I121.N" HARDWARE
FEDEALEAL.ESSTF.L..._ —__. ___ __- _.. 13.9].S.5, AIR FRUCIIOM.SERVICES.J-]-6. J-20
146086 FEDERAL EYFPESS CORP.CON f5T.5: AIR PR¢tGXT
1260P] FERN ELL 4AS 345.-U PROPANE
D
N
9 FUND NO 91-9 - JT LIST WORMING CAPITAL FPOCESSING DATE 4/04/96' PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
.._._COUNTY COUNTY----__-
x CLAIMS PAID '.A/Il/9G POSTING DATE 19/11/90
I060BM FICO•S APPLIANCE SERVICE $70.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
._...-1364X80----p4F4N-GENER.A.T.ION-SY4LTCNS-. _. _ ... .. . ._..____.....36S..Lb -....___....__.._BOPTNAP3._.__._.... ..... ..._... ..._ ... .., .. _....
106090 FILTER SUPOLY CO. SSOS.97 FILTERS
1060^1 FISCHER f PORTER CO. fIC390.0 CHLORINATION PARTS
_-__LAS 9UPP1,188-.__...__ _... ... -. . .._.._.
1061.93 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 643.30 FILM
1960.94 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $6,125.44 WATER USRAGE
- 1O6L95----3NE-FORU0N0-00 . .11C9 I4S------- --
D 139016 GAS RESTAURANT SVCS fb.737.86 REPORT USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
m 106097 GARDEN GROVE PROF. BLDG. f196.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
[Tf-iG60S8 -i A7Ei g18GnOL4.i--IMiIaLLC 0.8-._. __... __ •300.?O FIBERGLASS_____..-_....._ .... .... ._... .
Z 106099 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,693.61 TELEPHONE SERVICES
O I0616J GEORGE LEECH 3 ASSOCIATES $166.41 SWITCH
n--.-10630]--._..-GEWXAROT-RS•-ANE.-_-_ .... .... . ..._.... .-__.SS99.41.._....-_...___...._.-.[NST0.UM6NT PART..._.-__...
106102 GICRLICH-MITCHELL. INC. i18H56.34 MECHANICAL PARTS
-4 106103 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $509.15 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
3---14A.IA DN-GAEEK-4 RES 88-77 .. ..._ . .. .. ...._ ..
I9AI05 HACH COMPANY $34.19 LAB SUPPLIES
I76196 MARCO CORPORATION S6.375.T9 MECHANICAL PARTS
LA-- 44440] _..-MATCN-L.K4A,K. PART-_..----.....__. _
1061-8 MICHAEL HEIN2 $271.88 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE
IObIO9 hEVLETT PACKARD COMPANY $304.00 REGISTRATION
3 _. LCAL13 SA2-7.2i- COMPRESSOR PARTS __. .__ . .....
f- 1-16112 HOUSE OF BATTERIES SSSO.49 BATTERIES
f- 146114 R.S. OR-HUNT
IEST INC. fl.it9.tlt -WATER
11611b ��-- -----HUNT INGTONNPEACH CO. Ch ----- 3270.0G----------- --REFUND USER FEE - - THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 179.02 RUBBER USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
N 196115 RUNT ING iON BEACH RURNFR ST0.N1+ f196.59 RUBBER STAMPS
.._ .-_ 2.10.--------1.3611 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 3AI,19 .11 -- ---FEERRRIC LR6L8OaRiID6EE H.O.11-Y0
M8
8-N8T 9
n 1O6II8 14CUST0.1iL THREADED VPUO/CT" 4689.11 CONNECTORS
- --- -
'
-1_...-10MPIR..._.____..__ ._.......
N 106122 INLAND RANCH WATEEQUIR
MENTDISTRICT
CO. f1.$20.53 EQUIPWATER HST RENTAL
106171 IR VINE RANCH VATFP DISiF ICT 310.53 WATER USRAG¢
._Ilf11 2221 JEEN S EN TOOLS N9 ALL AG I3C.AT RS .6S31 6291..&17 ------VFACUUM BAGS
1CR1TR JOYfF OfFiCi PRODUCTS f946.9 S UFPLISS _ -
OFFICE SUPPLIES
......106126.-_-.. BEARINGS
SUPPLY
FITTINGS
106127 KAMER COMPANY
A SUopLY f920.R5 FITTINGS
106128 ELLEP COMPANY 11.690.I5 1Y10L8/RARDWARE
-106128..._.___ ....ELEER-EUU IPMENT CORP.. ._ _..._323.5ML.lA......_..-._ ....._. ......_.INSTRUME-CAPT3.__ .
l061t9 NAY-NAY. INC. f695.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS
19613U THE N[1 TM COMPANIES 11.314.6t ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-0SIJfi
ING OEARYEGS. -NHL.__.... .. . .. _ ...-.11.313.36-._._..__....._-BNCIABIRINCSRRVICE4- ._. . .. ... .
106133 KING INDUSTRIAL
INC. 117.586.18 TOOLS ICAL PARTS
106IS3 MN OR p:OUSTP7AL SUPPLIES SM.17 WOOLS '
a ...... . .........._.._. . __ _._.. .. _ .._ _.._ _._ _ .
•
FUND KO 9199 JT GIST YOPNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE A/04/9; PAGE A
I REPORT NUMBER AP43
._CCU MTV.SAN IT At I CN_01 SLR1CTS_.DP OR.LNG[..00OYIY
` CLAIPS PAID I4/I1/96 POSTING DATE 54/11/90
..__YAflBANi11O.____...___JtEPO00.._.__.__..____._.___.._J51UNL_._.____---____�fSLBSP_L111PL-___-._._.. .
196134 EASTMAN KODAK CO. $09.42 LAB SUPPLIES
__1^a1 SS _�SASS1lL6Ofi➢1LP..3R_--_._._._.__.. .._._._.._ S2.rR1 "-_.-------__-CONSTRUCSION SERVICES-16- -1 le..__
10613 L.A. LIQUID MANGLING SVS TE US . PUMP PARTS
106I37 LA YUIlIiA MOTOR INN
$212 f212.3737 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
Ab SAFE_[SBUTASIL _.. _ _. _..._. .140.Si.-__.__-____ SAFETY
LEE-0VERPAYM¢NT .. . __ ..
106I39 LAN SAFETY SUPPLY CO. f1A0.A6 SAFETY SUPPLIES
3C61AL' H.W. La YMPSTEN t CO., INC. fer162.38 SOIL TESTING
-.__19618L__.__._ LEARN KCflP9fl6I1Wl___..___ ._ __ 34.23..-.____-_- BRAINING Mh
n 1U61A2 LEARN FCY ,216.47 TRAINING MANUALS
6-! 1061"-.LINT
LE NOT CRABOARL 6 ASSOC. f2 Rl6rA7 OEOT¢CNNICpL INSPECTION
fiL_1D61R1 .IANIYORGU.L.CGER __.__._.._ _ ._..______ ,753.53__..___. -._-➢EWER ICBETEI..
C 1Y6195 OW IO L. TCSLORA)f ONIU INJ. f6Ii51.E0 REFUND
REAPERS
D 1J6146 LG[ AL A4I T43 fCOAb 6A S^ f936•.? -JANITORIAL.
USER FEE SUPPLIES
_. _.1DE197._-__.__.A.J..APPLIE_[0•._... __. _ _.- ._ . ._.__1911.2i_ ___________.__JANITORIALORING PS
106149 NUS NUCLEAR INC.YIR ORMERTPL 5915.00 OCEAN MONITORING
1061S. NUS NUCLEAR I f355.99 LAB SUPPLIES
s l90i _161 _ .__ __1215.19__ _. _ IA
_ CC..
3
116151 MACNTED . MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
I16152 PAINTEYANOE PPOSU INC. $559.52 POLYURETHANE
6 _MAR YiSUP"
V LUMBING-2MIS
116254 MARSHALL MT . PPODUCiIOHS f55.00 TRAINING VIDEOS
306155 MARVAC ELECTRONICS
..
1A7.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
_._1 �6156_-_-__11AII_tG3...1NC.________. . . _.._ 6. 3.7A_._.___._.--_..._._ELECTRIC_SUPPLIPS__._..
r 166157 CENA EN ANGP. 8 C9VIP. 52.30303.50 PACKING MATERIALS
I9 "CLEAN CLCAN Nt0Y1'ST t/r549.0P AIR CONDtTION¢R
1"16U P.S. MEANS CO., INC. 1774.65 PUBLICATION
106i61 TMOMAS P. MELT6N f151.26 NILBACB
-ICEGS6EMFG. CICB..-_.__._... ._ __._._1387.12.._.... .........
UP.FASYS
10AI63 MINE aSA MFG. CORP. SSS7.36 PIPE SUPPLIES
f, 1^f I6A MINE SAFETY PPPIiA IuCES CO. S909.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES
106165_____.__MONTEREY CARPETS
_ELC[T -------__..f9R.5.Rl.__...._.. ...__.___REFUND USER
OVERPAYMENT
N 196167 MONTGOME CANFETS ,890.00 R¢PUSU USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
116167 MONTGON ESU LAYDC ATORIES f6r890.U0 LAB LHARSERVICES
_.1:6168__._._..__.ONTR07_SUPPLY. CO. ..._.. .. . _____-215.16.__.__. .______.__-SMALL NAPDNARE
1SA169 N9RTON SALT AND/OP L$64.31 SALT
I'I117S MUTTON I CZLLUIES. EINC.RVI fAA.31 ECHANICALS PARTS
._. .1i£171_._.__ NATIONAL
TRE.3EN.Y I CEE ___ .._220.22_.____-._.__ __CELLULAR_ REMAIN
MACS
116173 NATIONAL HEAT TPEPTIN: . 1',C.[ .562.50 RBFUUO USER ME VICEPAYIICNT
30617E NATIONAL PLANT SEUVICE9. I'.C. 33 r562.8Y VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE
_1Ob175 NATIONAL SAEETY COUNCIL f225..SY. .__._.___ _._- MBENSNIF.PEES
116176 NEVI SIIEUEY CO. {913.24 INSTRUMENT
- - --
1:161i6 AENAPP ELECTS.' ICS f213.24 ___'REFUND
PARER
NNCSr Pd. {1r$56.43 __. _. _.__REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
10617E NORDSTROMOOSTPON f56.93 REFUND 09¢R FEE OVERPAYMENT
1S5119 NOPTMYf Si NOTNIP YCL CI I,0. I6
C. f9r 900.t,. MECHANICAL PARTS '
I _
F '
ri FUND NO 9149 - JT DIST WORKING CLPTTAL PROCESSING DATE 5/G4/9V PAGE _
I REGORT UUMUER AP43
._COUNTY SANII.L.TIOU_DISTRICTS OF GRAUGE_COUNLY
CLAIMS PAID 34/11/96 POSTING DATE •4111/9)
__N ARRANT Nn_ RENLOP.. eNOUNL—__ rera toIlON.—.___..._.__
106t8D OFFICE PAVILION/TNTEPIOR FL9. f9059.17 OFFICE FURNITURE J-T-S -
AI
116182 THE OEMART COPR 12.338.MP INSTRUMENT PARTS
106183 ORANCE CEASING, INC. 3162.67 BELTS
_.—.J.➢618v--_—DIANG[ IOASI n ECTB12_SUPSLt
1W61R5 ORANCE COUNTY AUTO FARTS CS. 1157.44 TRUCK PARTS
IO4186 GRANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 478.4.9P REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
—LCIIA? —._.—._11RAXGE._CO00ILY__E
n 10618R ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE 328L.27 MECHANICAL PARTS
m 106189 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. 3356.86 FITTINGS
ITT 1n119n nvvG[u KFRVllr '22.616.IE _--�ReCIAL2YGANGS— ..__—..__._._....___
106191 COUNTY OF OPANGr $2,953.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES
C le-192 C9UETY SANITATIGN CISTKICT $13,226.98 REIMBURSE WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE
n-126193—___. 859..35GASKETGS—__ -
106195 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPN $859.]5 BATTERIES
m 106195 PACIFIC PARTS 4115.55 BATTERIES
1-619T PACIFIC BELLay�$24�90 TELEPHONE SUSS---_---__.____._ ._.--..
3— IL619A PACIFIC BELL f29.90 CELLULAR
SERVICES
CL 1:619P nL CYEL CEL WEIL 15R.L' CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
lO IC6J 9-20C P_ATHFING[11ENSTRUMENNRANY__—__-__ _.._ ._Z267ELECTRSBOB..PAR35
2362O1 PHOTON kOSO INSTRUMENTS 126T.35 ELECTRICAL PARTS
1062➢1 PHOTO R BOUND CO. f325.G-R REPAIRS
n__.�162O2 -__--_PLASTIC .INDUSTRIES ._.____... _ __._—__3YT.%141.i1_._—--__._ PLASG89EMOVAL-M.0.5-it-BB ..
f— 1"e6203 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES ,657.19 PLASTERS
f 10620R POLYPUAE. INC. 419,65T.39 POLYMERS M.0.8-9-89,1-10-90
11621i—__.__._PORCH SPECIALISTS. Y_C0.__._ __.. _ __.—. _1146.12..___ _. . __.._ -_ .--FREIGHIC SUPPLI85-
106206 HAROL SPECIALISTS. INC. f56.93 FREIGHT
-1 106207 MLROLD REIMPOSE ICE f72.00 ICB
A_-1062L0--. _-TXE_FRGELECT SOL UTS➢N. CO.___-_ S4.T1T..0➢.—.._.__ -_.- __---183T8101ENTATIOR-INBPBCTIONX.O.B-10-88 --
1U625R A.L.M. ELECTRIC YOTONS 45.NTT.3R ELECTRIC MOTOR
['l 2�6219"A", xA1kg0Y OIST•OSLL CO. t959.99 TRASH REMOVAL
10621.L.__..__.RECI O—INC.___....... _ ._.... _ _—_3]9a$39.YL..___..._ .. ._. . —_LAG SUPPLIER
11.O.5-11-88 -
106213 PEOTHE EXPRESS
TER 14..00 LAB SUPPLIAD
106213 THE REGISTER fL155.5P NOTIC83 6 ADS
__ .. 1G621 -- —REND TE.IIETER_RES[TTI NL SYSTEM $2,435.00RUM _.__...._._.... _
1O6216 IH[ NEPUPL If. SUPL LY CO. f2,533.T8 LEGAL
PARES/FITTINGS
1G6236 J. A.-ROR YAT SON 4 LCd SHOW 4IJ.LST.a2 LEGAL SERVICES SERVICES
___306212.__—__ _R OSEMONT ANALYTICAL
iCP'._ _ . .. __.33 G1.799.2J _. _. ._____ELECTRICTIW SERVICES J-20- - - -
1L621B ROYAL WHOLESALE
LESALE E f2$692.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106219 ROYAL YNOLESACO ELECTRIC 1692.66 ELECTBIC SUPPLIES
_. _1➢6220_____ .... ..SAFETY ANA EN_CTRICPP. __—_. .110:1265 5D.. _. _. . . ELECTRIC
PART.__.
116221 SENTA ANT ELECTRIC MOTOPc 14.119.56 ELECTRIC PART
19L221 Sµ COAST UESIGNS 45-130.50 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
_.106223—_.. . __ _SELY_OF.ROEBUCK KCN _ .. . ___.__ _369.95 .. . ....... ... ......._ HATER USEACB_.__ -
106225 SEARS. ROEBUCK A CO. .600.74 TOOLS
106225 SE AYF OCX SUPPLY i1.60B.T5 WRDNARE
I
11T -
R
t n
� FUND PC RIMS - JT DI^T NOPKIN6 CAPITOL PROCESSING DATE 4104/9; PAGE 6 �
REPORT (:UMBER AP43
��_._..__.___—_____ _..---_._000N.TY-SAN17 AT16N-01SiB1CIiBE..ORJh GC. COUN.TT ...._._.......___-.._.....__.._.
' CLAIMS PAID 09/11/9b POSTING ORiF 09/11/94
. ......_YARRAN.T NO.-...... LYODR -- INDENT
19 E226 SILVER SPRINGS LATER f3.131.4P REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
__561.0. ___ __.- SLID89..—___._._.....__._._.___...............___..
1D6228 SYITh-EMERY CO. 3599.0: SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89
106729 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY S289•bL APPLICATION FEES
LOASI_A4L.JIDALI3Y—._____...__.__...__S]50.1. . . __............__APPLICATION-P686-__. ._.__._............ ... .._. _......_
IIIA231 30. C06ST AIR DUALITY i1.95J.90 APPLICATION FREE
106232 $0. C045T AIR QUALITY 3225.0^ PUBLICATIONS
•n•233--SJUL•_L.DODGE_ ._.__.____... ._.__._. _SS).75 .._.___.....TRUCK TARTS.___._.._ _._.___._.
3� 106234 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. 66.793.36 POWER
hT I06735 30• CALIF. ED190N CO. t6.721.0!' PON80. POLE R¢LOCATIOp
..=—IC4236--...._ en_ ..• - eA5_Cfl.-__._
p ___—_.__4 .6 .
1063 WCSTLLLOY INC. $1. 45.74 TNOAOTULRSAM4EL6DAISN-G SUPPLIES
D 106230 PPEEOE SP[[UOM[TCP $75.74 DRIVER
.._.-.._.___.___....__._..
TESTING
IJ4106940
0 MARK N.OL1_SURP:.LY-LQ.....___._—.—_ $116.R7. .
IQ6241 STERLING
IN gACINNAMDER 1$36.72 BACKUP CLAIM
176291 S LS"IMO ART i36•I2 GRAPHIC SUPPLI83
a..$_1062A2---SUCi4T7"CE
10lP47 SUYNIT bT C[L 92.SM17.27 STEEL
1067H SUPLLCO. INC. l218.PP LAB SUPPLIES
JANITORIAL-SUPPLIES._----- ---
_.____..._..__..
. I 10A246 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. 9129256,14 TOOLS
b 106247 TAGGIN. WAGGON MOBILHOME PARK 5106.72 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT
—1S124L--.—LA ILOLaDUND __.___ '1+..38.._._.______-____-T¢UCCR-PARTS--_-_._____.
f- IP6249 THORPE INSULATION $90.05 BUILDING MATERIAL
116250 TIME MOTION TOOLS 133.51 SMALL TOOLS
" 1062.2 707AL3_REVENTION SYSTEY.IGC--_._._.._. 1464.60.-...._ _ _.._.___..._. .__....._.__
.. N 106253 TOTAL PREVENTION SYSTEMS $296.28 ENGINEERING TSRVIC88 PI-27-I
l0625S M.G. TRERICE CO. SROb.Tfl ELECTRIC PARTS
J.6.ETUCAUTO-SOON. ANC ___....,_.$512.36._._,..__. STR-PARTS
f"1 IM6256 TWIN TUCKER 6 SON. INC. .823.60 INSTRUMENT PART
1W6256 TWINING LABORATORIES OF t3.B13.60 SOIL TESTING PAIR 14-89
".CN. ._1C625T.. .___._.._.JNOSCtlOUNL.INALY LILAL-_._...__...... ......._ ...__.. . .__..1240.11_ .. ... UNLEADED
TSOLINE ..__.._..
IG6258 UNOCAL 3$39.14 ELECTRIC GASOLINE
' 106259 UNITED ELECTRIC SUPPLY fS9.19 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
HEALTHCARE
R TRASERVICEg-..-.._........_._.. . ..___. . .. ._ _
' I0C262 VMSUPJ IV MEALY HCNSERVICES $125.06 CDR TRAINING
100267 VMS (VISUAL PONT.T. SYSTEMS)NB1 i5.664.Y5 INSTRUMENT
-..._.-106263--___Y.O.L.-TES.IFN4_.___.._._....__.......__.....__..____. ..16.486.O U._._. ....._._..._._...__LAN SUPPLIES C6ST¢R&--. _.
106265 VWP SCIENTIFIC $2.566.46 LAB ND USER
106265 VAUTTONLAMO f2.566.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
!:... _.._ 106266--__. . __VALLES_.INSTRUMENT GROUP
..CO....... _._. . ..._.__._._._._ .._34.124.LS_._._..._...__-__-„
10A267 VANIAN SYSTEMS NI GROUP $5.235.00 INSTRUMENT
UTERD PARTS
I06260 VCR ICU SYSTEMS 35.2l5.Ob COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
" 106269- ...__.__. VORTEX INDUSTRIES
SUI'.PlY_._..__.._. .._..__... .._...... ..__-995.36......._ . __..._._... _.NOR R.PAIMS.______._... _.__.. _. .......__...
106771 JOHN R.
3NOUSTRIES f995.00 DOOR REPAIR
•" 106771 JOHN R. VAD LCS f533•52 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT
��D
D FUND NO RP^ JT I.ISI WORKING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATC 4/V4/9_ PACE T
M AEPORT NUMBER AP43
-.v -0F ORANGE LGUNT',
CLAIMS PAID .4/I1/9W POSTINu DATE .4/I1/9C
f ....�MARRaU1TJA0.— •'FROM- _. _AYpUNT—__._ _-__..____-_OLSCAJni10N—
IO6272 CARL WARREN S CO. $426.86 INSURANCE CUIMS ADMINISTRAM
-0AR9D4r.1NL.—
106274 UESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. S761.0M EQUIPMENT RENTAL
106275 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $18.837.04 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.S-9-89
1AY--NR0FGLiWNN-BOMB ._. _...__._.--
106277 VEROR CORP. 17,674.22 COPIER LEASES
IP627R GEORGE YARDLCY ASSDCIAIFS $564.57 VALVE
-_._--.1y 19 YCLRA_L.IMOACQIAIT* A{GA-D{bi--.-_—._.__...�7.
D IC62R0 EVERETT H. YORK CO. S497.11, ENGINE PARTS
ITT106281 RICHARD YOUNG PROD. $534.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES
G IN283 !IMPRESSION CORP. $225,000.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2
D
TOTAt CUINB PAID $ 2,923,910.90
FEI
SUMMARY AMOUNT ._
#2- OPE8_FOt no,
� I2 PS0. 5.12128.00
• 02 CAP FM:no 2,962.58
-
D _a O1S$_PUND —--------
_12J32.91__-__
-� S3 GP FAC FORD _..__ 626.50
05 OPER FUND 735.57
05.CAP PAC1TiN0
Cn F6 OPER FUND 226.00
16 CAP FAC FUND 4.71
y-_17-OP99_POS�. _..- ..____ __�2.596.46
P7 CAP FAC FUND 3.229.94
SI1 OPER FUND 4.319.12
RI) OPER FUND _._.�8.00_._.__ -
814 OPER RUNG 20.53
114 CAP FAC FUND 5.386.40
_....- 1647 OPER FUNFOxe_.-._.____. 2,274.67
1761 OPER FUND 2,274.67
R]614 OPER PUNO 2,0I5.93
CORD _ 4 .55_._---.....
._ - _____.. 2,044,463663.55
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMB INSURANCE FUND 13.922.72
JTDI§'[_WORKING CAPITAL FUND.-.. -212.846.74_--_ .__ - --.._-__-..
S 2.923.910.90
V +
R
FUND NO 419M - JT DIST WORMING CRFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/I51/9P PAGE 1
M REPORT NUMHER AF43
COUNIY SALITATION OISYAICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
.A... ... . ...._ __...__ __.__._.__._.____CLA7M3"FAID'-T4%TJ79T'PO9TTNG-DATE -014725/99"_..-
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
IGF297 ACCESS ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS $138.25 LAB SUPPLIES
106298 GEORGE ADAMS JR. S7.644.15 SAIA PANORAMA UIMB AGREEMENT
'._.. .. __.ADVANCE➢-DFFTCE-SEIIV7T.78.--------.__________ATBW;50___.. __.. __.__dPPEClrE0ffiF&N7 _
106304 STRATA ALLEN 664.26 MILEAGE MUSE
106301 LEASiNO ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATL $1.293.32 AUTOMOBILE LEASES
2----9ATCTY-SUFPCY-AATP7CE___.._...__.___,__----3:'3S'._... $W2FCEE3
106303 AMEMICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY 62,752.62 FILM
106304 AMERITECH f97.75 COPIER LEASE
._3KOFF REPATR$TI ..
n 104306 APCO VALVC f PRIMER CORP 3180.08 VALVE
' ET 106307 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.115.55 NOTICES 6 ADS
-"70E lOR--�IPPLtTNNC-_ __-._.__._.__.=I.T.7S�P"•.. _-.-. TPNTb'R.1hYTb
D 3063C9 APATEX SERVICES. INC. $3.943.35 UNIFORM RENTALS
106310 ARNEL DEYLLOPMENT CG. $535.27 REFUND PUN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT
-- "'-'3063I1-'—A'SSOCTSTFD"T:➢NCRETE-PROD.-CSC---"—"-"'—'-"SW59.50 '--'-"--'" BUILDINclaft
m 106312 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING f1600C SOIL TESTING
.m__306313 ANSI - CORP. OF COASTAL AGENCY f350.00 REGISTRATION
]0E3'IT-�RLT:➢N"DTSPDSAC'3CPVRF"_.___..____..._._.YC22 i135.1.f....-•_.._ -..OR3'F' VA - =88 -
iC 106315 P.V. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. 3S.5BC.SL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-162.P2-37
lD 106316 R. DATIMAN ISO 5.^f DEMAND CORP DISTRIBUTION
106310 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2,642.16 LM SUPPLIES
Fl n 106319 HOWARD BLEVINS 3203.00 DEFERRED CONE DISTRIBUTION
"PLIES
106321 POLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $143.13 RADIATOR REPAIR
p IC6322 BON-A-RUES $126.26 TRUCK PARTS
"•+'-"" '115323-""' - 90YCCTNGINCCPTN6"'C'ORP---- -""'- "- ' ' ---f41i73O:93' _ "" -_''-"'----'ENOINEeRIHGSER�"aF7=1T—
106324 BRAGS CRANE f RIGGING CO. $762.60 EQUIPMENT Una
_ IC6325 GRIN - MAP I S3.225.54 UPUND PUN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT
FD
306327 PROVN S CALDWELL CDNSULTING 93.273.R" ENGINEERING SERVICES US 89-45
106328 PUPNE ENGINEERING CP. 31.49R.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
44 '-"106329-"-'_"""SUSH--ANIF"ASSOCIATES C INC': - "'--"'- """'-"-_"" -' 33.472:00- - '--`- '-- - __SURV89INCURVICtTlT-66-77
106330 GARY G. STRECO $2.464.35 PETIT USE RBIMBURSBMENT
106331 BY-PRODUCTS MANAGEMENT. INC. $30,419.24 PEROXIDE CHLORIDE M.0.4-12-89
_ !'SUMMM-SO[UTTO'NS-' - ""'-"""'--"---TSi7RST9T'---- SeRVlte AOREmfENT
216333 CAL-GLASS FOP RESEARCH. INC. 91,111.32 LAB SUPPLIES
106334 CALTROL . INC. $3.154.61 REGULATOR PARTS
10633S`- ----'CAUETUN ENGINEERS- '" " """ " -""'---" -12782B':57---""-'-'"'-' ' "'"'-'ENCINEERHG'SBRVECST=A0 71Cf}{I!0 '-
IC6336 CAROLLO-BOYLC.A JOINT VENTURE $1,710.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1-9
206337 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $34,666.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15
':. _.. 10633R-.._.__.._CASE POWER [ "EQUIPMENT '. ....• _ .___._ .._..._ .._....IS5:10'.__._._._....___..TRUCK PARTS -.
10fi3T9 JOHN CASON 33.667.5F MECHANICAL PMTS
1A6340 CENTCL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTI,9 66.357.13 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
30634E'"'--'--'"CENTRAL'-POTNT SOFTWARE INC': ' " - 933:00 `SUBSCRIPTION--
106142 CENTURY PAINT f791.28 PAIRS SUPPLIES
I�
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19/96 PACT 2 -
REPORT NUMREP AF45
N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF O.ANFL COUNTY
- CLAIMS oAlO i4/24'i/9O -POSTING DATE .9/I5%9D' ---"-
WARRANT KC. VENDOR AMOUNT OCSCRIPTION
106343 CHALLENGE SEARING L ING. $FLY $63.71 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
106344 PENNY CHARTIER $250.A.'-• DEPOSIT REARM_
.._.._- 106345.--._. C H F V kON-'1113.�.�(FrC._. ._.__.... __ ..__ ___ _._$11.532.95
106346 WILLIAM R. CLARKE $610.54 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
106347 C.I.E•S. , CO. , INC. ij.9CL OD NECMANICAL PARTS
_ .._._- 106346-'.—.—COMPRTSYOl1—COMP'6NCNTS-OF-CAL IT.___. 326.S14.t9 . . . ._...—.—..-PUMPPARTS --_
116341 COPPUTER DAIACOM L922.21 PRINTER RIBBONS
136350 COMPUSERVE $21.56 COMPUTER SERVICES _
D_ _..106351-'--._-CONNELL G.1f. 'P'A0r7-_D IT/..__._ ..__ . .._. .... _.—. f294.79 TRUCK PARTS
106352 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIRT. $7,044.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
T__ 106353 _ CONTAINERULD CHEMICAL DISPOSA 1975.90 _ _ _ TONIC WASTE DISPOSAL _
:2 166354 - -`-'-fON'T INFNT AL GAAPHI L'T---_ _ --" ' - - -----63;4'C6.12 BLUEPRINTING
n 106355 CONTROL CAOLES. INC. $44.1P TRUCK PARTS
106356 COOPER INDUSTPIFS, INC. L128,OR3.02 ENGINES M.O. 5-13-67.6-8-89, J-19A
106357 - - "-"COST-A -MESCAUTU"SUPP"L1""'- `- -' --L1i244.49 ---___-___xRDCR P T�-
~T1 f 106358 COUNTY WHOLLSALE ELECTRIC $944.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106359 CMEMPRO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES _ S1,253.9E JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
-3.—.107636M_. _CA'ElERER—__—_______. _._._.._. sT35:75 ._.. ..____.WUIPxETREM'TAL
.- 206361 LARRY CURTI TRUCK L ESUIFMLNT 125,000.0;• SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.4-13-88
tD 106362 STATE OF CALIF. DEPT. OF SEN. 199.L^ PUBLICATION _
1D63-63-" _ - '--STATE"OF "CKLIFORNIK--- $160.03 -'*_-_--SEE PROTESSING PEE
106364 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 616C.f0 SEE PROCESSING FAR
3> 106365 STATE OF CALIFORNIA L255.11 DIESEL USE TAX _
l� "---'-ID6366----STSTE'OP'CTLZFwRr—" ----'-- "' ' - ""-'"-""-'— -Li60.La ' " -'"- SRE PROEESS1NE E
106367 DAILY PILOT 643.50 NOTICES 6 ADS
IP9368 GANIELF TIRE SERVICE 62,941.PP FIRES
'Q-'" " 106369---'____DANTE-CONSTRUCTION—_--""""_"""" "-- S650.00 CONTRAACY SERVICES -
'� 106370 DESKTOP GRAPHICS L DESIGN i36.00 GRAPHICS SUPPLIES
106371 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $573.75 OUTSIDE PRINTING
.� 106372' ---GUNNEL-BROS-. HICR POVIMG-"- S-lifiAD.-Ol - -- - ----- - SPACE RENTAL J-IV
Y"Y 106373 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 67C2.AR PAT NT SUPPLIES
-I IDE374 D•VALS SALES 6357.94 MECMAMICAL PARTS
N _ 106375.. ._--_.. ' EIMCO'PPOCESS"EGUTF.'_CU. ._ _. ._ . . . _.__-i44009.08
106376 ENA SERVICCS, INC. 12V,637.97 CONSULTING SERVICES P2-A4
306377 ENSECO-CHL 93.700.00 CCCAM SANPLING
_. .10637E ..__. _E A STMLNE-TRC':--..-_- ..__ __ .. ._. _..__ ..__._—.L2 i31'9':9.1_. ._.....-.._.._ _-OFFICE-SUPPLY@ _-
106379 ECOANALYSIS. INC. $2,414.17 OCEAN MONITORING
10"83 ECOSYSTEMS L641NELPINf L AAAL, 17.750,0"• OCEAN RESEARCH
1063BT ' -- - ' ENG7NEER$'SAEESSSFRVTCC'CO. '"'-"'-"'--' $5190T2-"" " " ""` PUMP PARTS
106382 FNVIFONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. 3454.110 WB SANPLES
106303 MARSHALL FATRRES $350.0F GUESSED COMP DISTRIBUTION
."JOHN-E2"FALKENSTETWA.G -' 43"07:1C- " - ' ---CONSTRUCTIOITSERVICES7=7=6T-2O----
lOf3E5 EAfR SALES R SCRVICE L2,332.P9 FILTERS
1.63Rf FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 6293.T0 AIR FREIGHT
,•.____._."I'll. .._-__ _. - FERPELEOLS_____._ ...._ .. . _._..__ .._. ._._._934.43. ".... - ________ .-_PROPANE _ _
106398 FICO•S APPLIANCE SERVICE $207.12 VACUUM BELT
W
N
FUND NO 91.9 • JT LIST VOPMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4119/9U PAGE 5 ..n
REPORT NUMBER AP.3
W CpUWTv SRNITAIION OISIRICT3 OF pp lNlC COUNT•
_.A- __ __. ._----_- .—__._ . _..___._... -___CLAIMS PAID-""O.V25T907 -ROWING DATE 14725Y99'-_-_
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
1063R9 MILHACL J. FILCCCIA 6162.63 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
10639E FISCHER t PORTER CO. $2.466.97 FLOW IESER _
.__. IDA 391-"—""--t ISHE"Cl EN T 1FTCt0: ._____ _ . .__ _._ .....___-151U.13 ...-_—TAB3UPPLiEB—
IC6392 FLO-SYSTEMS 38.444.55 PUMP PARTS
106393 FLUID COMPONENTS. INC. $9,742.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS
._. ._I 3639R- -_____.f LUt0-I.RNp[tllr.'3TSTEPT- __._____ . _ .._ ...__.--.S 1T6Ti'5.51 - ..- _._-_...POMP
106395 CLIFFORD A. FORKEPT 6669.0. ENGINEERING SERVICES
106396 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 6364.71 _ FILM
FVUNTA'T%VAt6iT'-----"""'---"'-'- --" --- -5850:29 'VATER"D3E1
GDI 106396 FOR ENTCRPRISCS $1.825.01 SAFETY CONSULTANT
ITT ICE399 FOXBOR0 CO. V HAS SYSTEMS S69.U1 MACHINE PART
y_._. 1064Ct---.__JACK-iPl2HP____.___._._.__._-._. --- 63 - _..____._._. DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
D 106.01 FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS 1299.75 TRUCK PARTS
106402 A.F. FRET 6195.^_C DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
. -•_.. ..106403.".__ ttTT-OP'FUCLtRTOT--_.._.._._ -_.... _...__.._-___.=Si.]^ _. __. .- WATER-U3
HAu
3 106404 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $3.551.36 LUMBER
1664G4 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $5.418.71 FIBERGLASS MGM
-.---"-I'DE9tl6-'—Gf.NCPAT'M01T.T'-PKItTS"E-SORT...CMr__._.___.___._—__SS?:T?. . __. _____.__SAl'EITSOPPLTE
it 106407 GENERAL TELEPHONE CC, 66.553.37 TELEPHONE
LO .06400 GERHARDT•$. INC. 5561.J1 INSTRUMME PARTS
306910 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION 31.201.OP VACU M TRUCK SERVICES
bb 106411 DON GREEK t ASSOCIATES 3A.597.51' SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-72
r, - _.--LAB SUPPLCRIPEIEPAI
106411 FRED CO PRANY 3151.59 LAB RRPPLI83
tp 3D6aA iREU A. MARCER i1 d94.f3 DEFERRED COMP OISTRIBOTtDN
:-""-- -'"10fi9i?----NSRPIMGTON-INpW5TA 1'Kll•[11STIC3'"'--- " "' ""'—T1i9E5.9F _-'-"-'-'-�ALpCYAR7S%FIITRICS-"
N 106416 MATCH t KIRK. INC. $1.844.91 MECHANICAL PARTS
146417 HATFIELD DEVELOPMENT CA 31.667.92 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT
("1 lC6.19 MYLES S. HIDASPIRUPA 54.5. MILEAGE EXPENSE
N i4692i NIGH VOLTAGE ELECTSIC 1700.P1 ELECTRIC PARTS
Itl64T1-'"--- '- HASH YIELD PAKAMI:T INC.._ -"" --"--T225 OP _ - SENCNAR"l(ECISTRATION- —"---
196422 HOIR.IGE9 C.V.S. CAIIT. . INC. $653.81 COMPRESSOR PARTS
106423 DONALD 0. HONOMICML 3300.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
tT92:T0-_----- -------.._--PDf11HOID"CKKur
I06425 HUPIFON HIGH-PEACE 363.9M TRUCK PARTS
101.426 P.S. HUGHCF CO.. INC. $2.9.59 PAINT SUPPLIES
106427-- -`---CITT- PUNTINGTOM-MLAtH"-""' - " """' "' ""'--"-"-'517:96-' "- "--'- ---'VAMt TSEAGE-- ---
106428 HUNTINGTON HEACM RUPEES IIAPL t111.56 RUBBER STAMPS
106429 PUNTINGTON VALLEY SCNWINN CVCL 9101.84 BICYCLE PART&
f060C. -_ .._._- TOMCAT'K.'XOPII'-" - -- 399.50.
Tn6.31 THERGr STAYICES GYUPM 1129.87 ENGINE PARTS
106432 IMPERIAL rST CHEMICAL 175.299.7L FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.1"B-89
-- 106953- INDUSTM LAC THREADED PRODUCTS'_ ' _-'- ' - - -$642:77 "" -"--'-"_' -EDNNECTORA
106.34 INFILCO DEGNEMONT. INC. 347.897.09 BAR SCREENS SPEC B-176
LA _
FUND NO 9159 - JT LIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 4/19/9L PAGE
w REPONT NUMBER AP03
,p COUNTY SANITATION DISTMICTS OF ORANCC COUNTY
- ---------'---CLAIMS- PATD-01'/YS/90'"`POSTING DATE 04%2479Q-
WARRANT NO. VCNDGR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106435 INGRAM PAPER t2.33J.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
LU6436 THE IRVINC CO. $3.974.41 REFUND PLAN CUM OVER DEPOSIT
-------1U613T--.-.-._-'7. NCK'T-CNAIFGC-- '--.---."_--'---3GA5:93 _....._____.__
19643O GREAT WESTEpN SANITARY BURP, $604.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
106439 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 5549.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
.."--.-iOF rfT—�STC'C'VTFTCF-'PROD➢CTS--__._ ___—_._S62 T.94"__ ..-._..--DTP]
106.41 KCLLEEN'S COMPUTER SUPPLIES 3726.93 OPPICE SUPPLIES
106.42 KAMAN bEARINGS L SUPPLY 136.54 BEARINGS 3. 10fi«4 MAPLES COMPANY $552.21 PAINT
f3
_rt1 106445 FLEET EQUIPMENT CORP. $19.653.95 ELECTRIC CARTS
Z -1'OFf06 -RISZLFTTYTKODUCTS—___—_-- _T92:3P _._-_-
L7 106447 RAY-RAY. INC. 3N54.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS
'1- Y 306.4E KEIIH-STEVCNS. INC. 33,077.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES
__%IiDi1.02". .-.' ---_-7UtLFINE'SOPPLIES —
�! 106450 DONALD C. KINNEY $146.97 DEFERRED COMB DISTRIBUTION
s m 106451 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUFPLILS 1150.47 GAUGE
m"TOF45F---TVC-RORZiT .--_. - {906"."I r.._. __.
306453 MARTIN WOFDICR. SP 32.136.31 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-IR
LEI 1Of454 FORNLAND EUILD106 SR37.Sf REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT
106455-"__.. _._._.-LI-COLT NA"TFCCL EA'-DC V: CO.""""""""-""'" '----"'- '-546.96 "'"------ REFDBITI rCHECK-OVER OEFOSII
106456 LEIGHTON L ASSOC. $9.271.B1 LAB SERVICES
F, 106459 LE ROY CRANDALL A ASSOC. $3.632.59 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES
_1
_...__ .7 0G'fSp--._..-CTEP.LRTCURPUR'Rt01:"--_.__.._... ___.-._ ST.Tv �DP '
F- 106450 LIMITOPOUE CORP. 3E.660.3P ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106460 N.G. LINDSTROM, INC. 34.'96.23 CONSULTING SERVICES - MASTER PLAN
JOHN-L"C"UMPSi PARTS--'---
';; VI 206462 LOCAL AGENCY 51.500.00 LAM PEE
1 106463 LOCAL AGENCY 5750.09 LAFCO PEE
- -'-"106469
('1 IOf 465 MPS $44.41 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
]. 106466 MAJOR LOCK SUPPLY 3399.5C SAFETY SUPPLIES
NAPTNE- VAEVC-SUPFL.1�-_______.-___..__._..gr,7 e]3______..__
„ 106468 MARSHALL MAINT. PRODUCTIObS $191.00 INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOS
106469 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 611.22 INSTRUDENt SUPPLIES
106970TATT_CN[OA-�TNT--... --SST..6T ---ZRL0RIRATIGP'PARTS —
206471 MCKENNA CASA. A CQUIP. $2,044.93 FREIGHT
10f472 MCMASTLR-CARP SUPPLY CO. 31.413.64 DAMAGE
..,__-.. 106473-'_......._ ._NTCROASt.-COMPUTER- _. . .._.__ - ------ _... . .. _ ". ."_.. . COMPUTER'S PLIES.-
10f474 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. 32P3.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
106475 MOTOROLA. INC. 5669.30 PAGERS
___—_.000L9GA_TIT.EPROIIE_SERVICES -
106477 NATIONAL LUMBER t554.64 HARDWARE/LUMBER
1PM 7N NAl10NAL PLANT SLPVICLS. IOC. 31099.09 GENERAL INSPECTION
106479--"""""'-NOTION'LL-TCLnN1CRL' INFORMATION -'- ------" "_ ' - 1117.5C - ' ""- -- -"-""'-----PUBLICATIONS-- - ----
106480 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $9.700.63 PANELING
ML
.. r 4
C W
f
FUND NU 41 en Ji LIST WUNMIML G(1TAl P00CC55IN( DATE 4/19/9' PAGE 5
COUNTY NUMHFR 4H3
N CO SP IIIIATION 013TTI III UATEE COUNTY
CLAT
.. . ._ _ .. _ .._.._...___.. __.._............. __....._._____,.._. . CLAIMS PA7 C"34725/90 POSTING
"-"PO STIhG DATE 04/PS/90......._""--"'--- ..
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
186481 NCAL SUPPLY CO. 381.6L HARDWARE
IV6482 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH S4.0P WATER USEAGE _
_ ...ITS483 ._.___.._.CHAR'LEF`N TCXOE9--...-._.. .. .. . .. .............._._..5.10:OL "-. MEETING EIIPENSE
106464 ERIC NIEMUES 32.484.12 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
106485 M.C. NOTTINGHAM CO. INC. $690.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES - PUMPING
-.._...."... IDE48F.._.____NOIIFTT-STTCL T'._9--SUPT'LT" OTINC .. .. .. __.... .---$93.75.. _. ..___ .._STEEL ----
106407 O.M.S./SDLAG DISPOSAL CO f1.872.0f TRASH BIN RE(OVAL
106408 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $243.94 SAFETY CLASSES
'.._. .__ 106489"_"__.._. . OFFICIAL ATREINE GVTOES_..... . . .... " .. ... ."._-_.f 1G6.04 .. . ._ ._.. SUBBCRIPTION___.".______.-___.
n 106496 DR SYSTEMS CO. 628.379.17 CHLORINE N.0.2-14-90
106491 CYNTHIA OPNEIL 330d1: MILEAGE EEPERSE
.. Z 1JR 492"...._.__ ._. ROFCCT-J:._CDTCT __.. .__..__... .. ... . . .-_137I.A. ...__ ._ �ETIMC-EBPBNEE
nC IA6493 ORANGE. BEARING. INC. $295.55 FITTINGS
10(494 PRANGE COAST CLCCTP IC SUPPLY 3147.7E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
'106195-'-""' -' ORANGE COUNTY AUTO"PARTS' CO'. " "' -""""-`3l5.5P -- _ -- " TRUCN
y 106496 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE S451.02 ROAD STRIPING
Fv1 106497 ORANGE VALVE 3 FITTING CO. 3514.83 FITTINGS
:-- OTVGEN-SEPVTCE—.-__.__". A3i3P5.35_
# 106449 COUNTY OF ORANGE 54.875.03 WASTE HAULER COTS FEES
w 1065C0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $6,155.17 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
"'-----106501"'----'-""COUNTY SANI7ATTDR'CTS78IGT ' "" "-'-""`35'S I18:17' ""' _ REINBUmif w6kkm COMP-INSURANCE -
106502 PC MAGAZINE $61.97 SUBSCRIPTION
�a 1 P65P3 PS1 5951.87 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
.f..-.'7063OV"--'-'-PAfiFTC-'P1NT8'--"-......__, .. _. ._,........ , ....._..-.'39i?Z2.69'_. ., _ __..... ._._.._.NELHANICAL—
Fluff-S-F- 106505 PACIFIC SAFETY EDUIPMCNT CO. 33.666.1E SAFETY SUPPLIES
._C:2 _ 1965M6 PACIFIC DELL $27.53 TELEPHONE
PACMFI-"ASSUCl1TES"-------- -- _.. .. .."..._. _.._.S21.155"S "' -- -"-- -'CONSOCTl1IL=PUBE0-Wu-TI7NSUE81 7
Cn 106508 PARTS UNLIMITED 31.624.70 TRUCK PARTS
106509 ROY PENnEAGNAFT S445.EP DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
._ 106510..._ .._...... PHOTO-I--SOUNO-CC.- .-..._._., . . ..__ __. _... .SIT.7fl. . .. . .. ..... PkOJECTOR REEATII-----
(-Y 106511 PICV61CK PAPER 1261.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
-"I IV6Sl2 AIMA GNP. SYSTEMS. P'C, S44.034.16 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
(n 1P6523"" ` - P17HEY Routs ...115P.SR POSTAGE METER REMl'AL:
1PE514 POLYPOPE. INC. $23.467.18 POLYMERS M.O.1-10-90.8-9-89
106515 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $982.76 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106516-.__.__.. MARPLTF PR TMROSC TCC"....' . . ... ...._._.._..__'S IZ1':G1_......_. _ IOE.__._.______-- .-.
106517 PPOCESS LOUIPMEMT CO-PINY 21.316.CP SEALS
10651E THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CL. 54.020.0E INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0 6-10-88
ICG519" ,_ _PURLISX . . ..._._ _..AMOS. _. .._ .. .. SUBSCRIPTION
106520 R M CONTROLS $533.43 CHARTS
106521 R.F.M. ELECTRIC MOTORS S2.631.54 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
ICE522" "' _'Pf AL' OSTATE'DEVCLOP-rNT CORP. '-"""` 5391.53 "' REFUND PLAN'CHECK OVER OEPOSYT----'-
166523 PLCYC. INC. SR6.64 i.WP SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
116524 REIN VALVC CO.. INC. 92,361.62 VALVE PARTS
106525 PER MIME SXOFS'"' "' " "" _"'" $080:V9 - SAFETY SXORS------ -- '--
1D6526 REPUBLIC ENGINES 1146.15 TRUCK PARTS
FUND NO 9111 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL FPOCESSING DATE 4/19/9B FADE 6
REPORT hUMbCR AP43
a) CDUk IV SAAITAIIDN OISTk1CTS OF ONANFL COUNTY
---___..__ ___._--. __...._ CLAIMS PAID 54/25/90. ..POSTING DATE' e4/2519U_____._ _.- _
WARRANT 40. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106527 THL REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 2116.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
ID6528 RFNOLD POWER TRANSMISSION S94.32 MECHANICAL PARTS
106S29'-"_ " ' - RICNAORSr VUTS6N`'A' CEPSHON "' - -'-- "-'- 661000.60 " - -_-' LEGAL SERVICES R.0.6-I1-86 ' --
106536 ROBERTS 6 SONS COAST. CO. 6484.13 RRPUNG PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT
106531 RODNEY-HUNT CO. $6R7.44 GATE PARTS
106!3R ROYCL-TNSTO'UKENT--"__-
106533 RYAN-NERCO 1272.48 HARDWARE
106534 S.A.F. MACHINERY ENG.. INC. $6:35.63 MECHANICAL PARTS
._.... 206535____..___ SAT'TT"EEEM"CORPT---_. _._ __ . . __.__.. _.-. 3112.90 ._ ._._ __._ PARTS CLEANER _._.
D IP6536 SAFFEL 6 MC ADAM $409.20 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT
nl 106537 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT.L S25.432.39 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-I4-89
10653E-- -----nACLTFFC-7)CVECOFME6TC0:"' """' -"-'""""' "" "`'--s5J 9:O0 ASITIN P LOCK EU OVER DEPOSIT ---
C/ 106539 SHAMROCK SUPPLY A1.J65.26 HARDWARE
D 106540 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $0 G.47 ENGINE PARTS
1?6541' `-----STEP R4 CV IRONiENGP.TWf"""'-- -""'--'-" """'" --"-"-12GI6 CJ2 f"'--" " ""'"-"'"--ENGINEERING SeR110ES
--1 106542 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 194C.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS
M IDb543 SMITH.-EMERY CO. $2.887.S0 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-16-89
.-''t 1F654�__.--01C-A ND"TnlTWO-ENVI NEE Re.-.__.._. _..__.____._5589.n 0._ .. - ...-. SOIL msi'iiid .6.6-14-89
4t 166545 SOUTH COAST DODGE 3245.65 TRUCK PARTS
LD 106546 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $341,123.73 POWER
._..__ '1 C6117 ... -.__. _SO. TALI GAS-CR.-_..._-_._... --. 36r91B.36 NATURAL GAS---- ---
ID6548 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPOR. CO. 5510.0 EASEMENT AGREEMENT 2-26
D 106549 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $47.25 DRINKING WATER
166556 '--"_'_ "--SPAGEING"TNSTRIINFNT_CO7:TNC: '-"--'-"' - `--" "'A242.3. '--- INSTRUMENT' APA[
IC6551 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFI, P.E. $7.20J.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162.P1-20.P2-37
C 101512 WESTALLOY INC. $2.107.41 WELDING SUPPLIES
_ 306553"___._._-�TAR'TOOL-A' SURREY_.[._.___...._...___.. __.___.SIT039:73_. __. _._.... .... ___-.TOOLII--__-___
106b54 STATER RPOS. MARKETS $6,695.87 REFUND PLAN CNECR OVER DEPOSIT
106555 STERLING ART S76.99 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES
1.6556- --SCOTT-5TEVENS------_- AE74.700 - DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
('T IC6557 SUNIA. INC. $265.63 PRESENTATION AIDS
-1 106ES8 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE L MAIkT. $3.847.04 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.8-9-89
106559-_...._.._.__`SUNSET-FORD'._._........__ _. . .. . . .. .. ._._... -535"5"_.._... ... _.._ _.. TRUCK PARTS_._._ __-
106560 SUPELCO. INC. S833.09 LAB SUPPLIES
106561 CONTINENTAL AIR 7001 . INC. $3.032.32 TOOLS
20E562-___...,-.._ SURVEYOPS"SERVTCE"'CG:__.. _... _.. . . . ___.___.1997764.-_. SAFVY-SUPPLIE
116563 74LIU TIFF. INC. S259.84 TIRES
106564 TAYLDR-DUNN 1799.22 TRUCK PARTS
-- 1DE565 TECH N'ICAL PRODUCTS'-1 CTRLS" "- '" - ''1346'.95" "'- '" - - - - INSTRUMENT PARTS-- --
106566 TEKMAR COMPANY 1932.71 US SUPPLIES
1OE567 THORPE INSULATION 9504.12 BUILDING MATERIALS
706566 "" - 3T FGUTPPEI:T COMPANY" "' " ' - "-- "" 13E1.P.f. '" -" -"------- SAFETY-SIGN'---"--
106569 TIME HOTIOh TOOLS $65.34 SMALL TOOLS
106570 TINKER L RASOR S2.99.1.38 INSTRUMENT
L_._._. ..10657T__._._..._ _TRAVEL TR-AVEL-................ ... __.._._. _ _. ._._._ _. .S1B148TW00 ._- .. _.. .__-_._ TRAVEL SERVICES
106572 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY. INC. 1234.59 TRUCK PARTS
CO
T '
4,
f
FUND h4 of 9P JT ;IIS1 VURMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19/94 PAGE 7 ..
COUNTY NWMNEP AP93
V COUNTY SEA I T/TION DISTRICTS Of OP 0IF COUNTY
�_... .. .__ _.___..__..._....._..-._._...____ ......._. ... . CL AIMS VYiD...tR"/29'790_'.P0STT NG D/Tf'GT/7S/9R_.-"-•_-'—
- WARRANT NO. YCNOON AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
166573 J.G. TUCKER A SON. INC. 51.649.34 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
S W6574 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTER.INC. 5577.16 cuss
.. . IG65T5'.___..__.__..UNION-31T'A'vow—..._....__.. . . . .. _..._._.. ..........._-.STF229:CC
106576 THE UNISOUMCE CORP. $314.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES
106577 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3145.P7 PARCEL SERVICES
-C
. ._._. ._. 1065TF-.---1tT1TAP- CTVRTOR-COMPSSY_._._.. _. ........... ..__.._.-__ 1311.15 _... ._--__._ ABIMICTU=11 _.
10E579 VAR SCIENTIFIC $3.322.11 LAB SUPPLIES
IE'65PP VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 59.446.37 FITTINGS
10B5PY"-'—'V kN-EEL UVC N"PTFE-'S'TIR C"'_""' SIF623.1'O'" S12EC--
„G.1 106952 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP $323.09 LAB SUPPLIES
.m 106583 YC9TCA SYSTEMS 12.697.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
Z._ ... 106584-._. _.-_-..VTNING-TNOOSTRIAL SUPv1T_. _.... EAFETT"SOPPf:IES-
.O 1065A5 VILLAGE NUPSERIE3 S2MF.50 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
'n 10R586 AALIEAS WHOLESALE ELLCINIC 5319.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
. _._.__._1T1'4'.9a ......... . _._. . _.. REFpNDRL7J1"CNECE"OTER'UEP09IT—
t,--I 1065PP CARL WARREN L CO. S30O.G0 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
-rn 106509 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $97.50 PUBLICATION
3. -_t0E99D- 'L'PL-C 3"FSRS'P'G V ERO-SCR YTCL....__.. ...__ _..,__._,.._.—._1383:73.. ..-_-..___..COAAO GERYLCm-_ .
106"1 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS. INC. 5332.36 SAFETY SIGN
LO 1:6!92 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CS. &1.439.66 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
__._..... __-n 9iB84.31" --_.._._. __-.CAUSTIC"900A 11:0:B-T-99 --
-' M 106594 VESTRUA INTERNATIONAL 61.132.57 TRUCK PARTS
n 106595 ROURKE E WOODRUFF $39.077.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-4-89
.,� . .._._ t0F!96"-______TCkOfTORY:__..___... .. . .. __... .._._...._-...__....�T;PO _. . ....__._.__-_._....CDPCEFELE ES-
106597 RICHARD B. EDSAP 120U.04 DEFERRED CORP DISTRIBUTION
.N TOTAL CLAIMS IAID 64/25/90 51.668.364.2W
P� SUMMARY .. .... ... .... . ....- AMOUNT
ll
N NI . ....... ..... .... . 136.72 . ... .._-.__.._--__s _..
!2 5, .3
13 ,706706.39
YS 1,791.34
Y6 .. _. ......__.....___... _ . .__ .... ..... .. ... . ... ... ...._ __._fi.729.0fi___...... . ...... ..._..,._. __-.__-__ -...
06 _. ... ._ . .._ . 2,473.93
07 34.794.06
17. ...-._._.._.__ .__... . ... . . ... ._... ..47.356.62 . . ._
011 6,749.59
014 282.787456.16
3
519.63
0667 13.690.44
.:..... Y1614.. . - .... .. ....... . . ... ... _. ......__._.__. 6.387.44........__.._..___._.__..-__ _
JT OPEN FUND 354.973.45
t CORE08
SELF 711.743.17
fA SELF ST WORKING
INN CRT, TAL IMSURAM08 POND . . .. .. ... .. _. .. 86,375.5 Z.
V JT GIST NORKINC CAPITAL IB6.P5.38
i 1,66E.764.28
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
AO.Box B+27
FONNTAIN VALLEY.[ IFOPMA 9272`' /
April 12, 1990 1 B BLUS AVENUE V++Bx
.MU UIN vA Y.CAUFOFNIA 9270E-m+2
MEMORANDUM n+m smas+o
n+Ai 9sx-zxn
To: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
From: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager
Re: VIDEO INSPECTION SERVICES FOR DISTRICTS TRUNK SEWERS AND
MANHOLES, SPECIFICATION NO. S-045
Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, April 3, 1990, for Video
Inspection Services for Districts Trunk Sewers and Manholes, for
a two-year period beginning May 15, 1990.
Tabulation of bids as follows:
Houston & National
Harris Pipe Plant
P.S.S. Inc. Cleaning Services
Whittier Riverside Long Beach
Item
A. Trunk Sewers
Size Range:
8 to 60 Inch
Average Price $.524/ft $.536/ft $.92/ft
Estimated Annual
Cost for 25 Miles
of Trunk Sewers
Inspection $69,168 $70,752 $121,440
B. Manhole Surveys
Estimated 100 man-
holes per year.
Estimated Annual
Cost $10,725 $16 ,444 $47 ,713
Annual Estimated
Total for Items
A 6 B $79,893 $87, 196 $121,917
C. Miscellaneous Charges
1. Sewer Lines -
Set-up Charge on
Orders less than
1,000 feet $175 $500 $735 n
C-1" AGENDA ITEM #10 (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1"
Page 2
Houston & National
Harris Pipe Plant
P.S.S. Inc. Cleaning Services
Whittier Riverside Long Beach
Item
2. Manhole Surveys
Set-up charges: $65 $300 $650
For manholes less
than: 5 ft 20 ft 20 ft
3. By-Pass Pumping
Service as Required $250/hr $350/hr $150/hr
It is recommended the award be made to P.S.S. Inc. , the lowest
bidder, for a two-year contract for Video Inspection services. The
two-year contract period is estimated to cost $159,786 for video
inspections based on projected usage, plus $5,000 for Miscellaneous
Charges listed as Item "C", for a total of $164,786.
Ted Hoffman,
Purchasing Manager
We hereby concur with the following recommendation:
r r
Gb&y Streed,
Director f/\off 'Finance
l
Tom Dawes,
Director of Engineering
v cc: Rita Brown, Boards Secretary
TH:bp
"C-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECISS AVENUE /
MUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Tko (2)
CONTRACTOR: Gust X. Newberg Construction Co. DATE Mav 9. 1990
JOB: PRIMARY CIARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION
PI= NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct-) $ 21,371.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the follaving changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as ccupensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - TELEPHONE SERVICE CONDUIT ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to provide and install telephone conduit between the
Construction Management trailers and the existing Blower Building basement. The
service requirements of the telephones added to the Construction Management
trailers exceeded the existing capacity of the telephone conduit. The contract
specifications did not incorporate the required additional conduit. This item
of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of
the General Provisions. (Reference FCO #2)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,497.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER PTEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - WEST Ply ROAD MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to add a light pole and relocate the specified camera
at the entrance of the West Perimeter Road. The camera was relocated to increase
the field of vision and expand mobile capabilities. Additional conduit and wire
were required due to the camera relocation. The additional light pole was not
shown on the contract plans and was required for safety lighting and camera
viewing of the west entrance at night. The raising of the concrete island at the
west entrance from 3 inches to 6 inches is also included in this item. The
specified island height was increased to conform with typical cub Nights
throughout the plant as a traffic safety measure. This item of work was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions. (Reference PCH #1 and FCO# 11)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,498.00
TIME Egffi4SION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"D-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. 0. 13OX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
fOUNLUN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CON1RA=: Gust E. Newberg Construction Co. DATE MAY 91 1990
JOB: FRDIARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RE[A7ED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33
Item 3 - POT HOIE R.XlSTnG PIPE T
The Contractor was directed to pot hole and survey the location of the existing
36-inch Orange County Water Districts (OW) waste water pipe line at the
OCSD/OWED property Pule. The contract plans shoe this pipe line to be
abandoned. Upon further investigation OLWD has requested to maintain flows in
the referenced pipe. The exact location and verification of pipe l;.m material
were new for future extra work which will be included in a forttooming change
order. All costs included in this change order item and all future change order
item associated with CM pipe lines will be paid by OCWD. This item of work
was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the
General Provisions. (Reference POO i10).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,376.00
TIME EXTSNISICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER TPEM: $ 21,371.00
TIME EXTENISION THIS CHANCE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional cork contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Tim made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date November 2, 1989s
Original Contract Time 800 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date January 11, 1992
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Tim Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 800 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date January 11, 1992
Actual Final Completion Date January 11, 1992
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
"D-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 ^
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FfT.TC AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE may 91 1990
JOB: PRIMARY CIARTRTR.RS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACII,TFIES AT RECLANfMON
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33
Original Contract Price $ 39,657,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 44,925.00
This Change (Add) (D ) $ 21,371.00
Amended Contract Price $ 39,723,296.00
Board Authorization Date: May 91 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMHEMED BY:
Construction Manager Date
GUST K. NEWBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
ACCEPTED BY: AP BY:
Contractor Date Director of Engineering Date
"D-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3"
S
COUNTY SANrTATTON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECTTG AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALM EA. 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRA=: S.A. HEALY COMPANY DATE Mav 9, 1990
JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 AT RECIAMmrON P= NO. 1
JOB NO. P1-35-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 92,392.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following addition to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 FUDCATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 M OR CAL CENTER (IBC)
Thee 'sting Mx panels are located inside the digester pump control room which is
a corrosive environment. The electrical equipment malfunction from time to time
due to the wet, dirty and corrosive em:ironuent. This area is designated as a
Class 1, Division 2 area which requires special equipment to meet the Uniform Fire
Code. Therefore, the Contractor wee directed to relocate the existing control
center to Power w'i i.ii C, Mx-1a, which has a controlled environment. Added
time was allowed the Contractor due to the long lead time involved in obtaining
the new electrical control panels. This work was accomplished an a time and mate-
rial basis per Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 51,479.00
TIME E )MENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 60 Calendar Days
Item 2 REPLACE DEFECTIVE PLUG VALVES
The contract documents required two knife valves to be installed between the
digester walls and existing plug valves. The existing plug valves were found to
be defective and could not be connected to the new piping system. The Contractor
was directed to replace the plug valves with ball valves which have flanges
compatible with the new piping system. This item was accomplished on a time and
materials basis per Section 10-6(b)2B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,800.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELISS AVENUE
Ep NnUN VALLEY, [`AMFOannn 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. O. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: S.A. HEALY COMPANY DATE Mav 9. 1990
JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1
JOB NO. P1-35-1
Item 3 STAINLESS STEEL HOOPS TO HOLD PVC LINER IN PLACE
The Contractor was directed to fabricate and install Type 316 stainless steel
hoops that would expand against the PVC liner and prevent digester gas from
attacking the dare concrete. Seven stainless steel hoops were required. This
item was accomplished on a time and material basis per Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the
General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,990.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 RELOCATION OF 14-INCH SLUDGE MIXING LIME AROUND DIGESTER NO. 8
The proposed 14-inch sludge mixing line on Digester No. 8 was to be located just
above an existing 8-inch primary sludge feed line. The 14-inch ductile iron
sludge mixing line requires large heavy duty pipe support brackets. The new pipe
supports could not be installed at the location she because of the existing 8-
inch primary sludge feed line located below. It was therefore necessary to raise
the 14-inch mixing line to a higher position on the exterior digester wall. This
required the upper nozzle penetration to be raised to prevent digester gas from
being trapped at the high point in the system. This item was accomplished on a
time and material basis per Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 11,040.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 CHANGE NEMA 4X CONTROL STATION TO EXPLOSION PROOF BOXES
The outdoor mixing pump control areas are designated to be Class 1, Division 2
areas which require explosion proof boxes by the Uniform Fire Code standards. The
Contractor was directed to upgrade all control stations at Digesters 7 and 8 .
This work was accomplished on a time and materials basis per Section 10-6(b) (2)B
of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,073.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"E 2" AGENDA ITEM #10(c ) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECd.7S AVENUE
FOJNPI.IN VALLEY, CAUIPMUA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Three (3)
CONIIWC : S.A. HEAVY CCNTANY DATE May 9, 1990
JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AVID 8 AT REC[AMATICN PLANT NO. 1
JOB NO. P1-35-1
Item 6 OUTDOOR LIGHTING FIXTURES IN PEW MIXING AREAS
The construction plans dirt not provide for any outdoor lighting in the pomp nu ing
areas. Because this area is designated as a hazardous area, the Contractor was
was directed to install special lighting fixtures with explosion-proof boxes
approved by the Unifom: Fire Caffi to eliminate a tripping hazard and provide a
safer work area. This work was aa:cuplished on a time and nnterial basis per
Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,635.00
TIME EITENSION THIS CRANE£ CRUM ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 7 REPAIR AND IUTIACE-04T OF DAMED GRATING
The Contractor was directed to repair and replace damaged or missing aluminum
sections of grating to provide a safer working area inside the Digester 7 and 8
caitxol room. This item was acccuplished on a time and material basis per Section
10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ACY�D COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,375.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER: $ 92,392.00
TOTAL TIM EXTENSIO] THIS CHANGE ORDER: 60 Calendar Days
The additional work curtained within this Change Order can be perfomed
incidental to the prime cork and within the time allotted for the original
Contract plus the 60 days time extension granted hereby. It is, therefore,
m tually agreed that no time extension other than the 60 days approved herein is
required for this Change Order and no direct or indirect, incidental or
cmsequentia: costs, or expenses have been or will be inn,rred by Contractor.
"E-3" AGENDA ITEM k10(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3"
COUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELi.IS AVENUE �..d
TOMBLIN VALLEY, CALLEORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: S.A. HEALY COMPANY DATE may 9, 1990
JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 AT RFPfAMATON PLANT NO. 1
JOB NO. P1-35-1
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date April 25, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Coupletion Date Decarber 20, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 60 Calendar Days
Total Tins Extension 210 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 450 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Due Date July 18, 1990
Original Contract Price $ 2,530,072.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ (210,549.001
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 92,392.00
Amended Contract Price $ 2,411,915.00
Board Authorization Date: May 9, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RPCDMMENDED BY:
1
Construction Manager - Date
S. A. HEALY COMPANY
ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY:
ConU
actorw '. .a,�, Date Director of Engineering Date
"E-4" AGENDA ITEM #10(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX$127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272"127
a 1O ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962-2411
(� FAX(714)98241358
11
April 25, 1990
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Pauntain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendunt No. 2 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engine ring Corporation
in Connection with Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17
In accordance with the Districts, procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Calnlittee has negotiated the following
fee for Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation for the design of the Central Laboratory, Job No.
J-17, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct costs,
subconsultants, and profit, in an amount not to exceed $162,598.00 as
follors:
Engineering Services, for labor
plus Overhead at 155.5%,
not to exceed $ 6,438
Direct Costs, not to exceed -0-
Sub=mA, tents, not to exceed -0-
Profit -0-
$ 6,438
Construction Mananwrpnt/Inspection
Personnel (hourly rate including
labor, overhead and profit) at
$80 per hour, nut to exceed $156,160
Total, not to exceed $162,598
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be perfonoBd and that said fee will not
result in excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/A. B. Catlin /s/William IMihonev
A. B. Catlin Willaim Mahoney
Joint Chairmen Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Thcmas M. Dawes
Thetas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"F" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) ( 1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-41
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ^
AGREEMENT-WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR
SIGN JOB NO. J-17
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR DESIGN OF
CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17, PROVIDING FOR
WAGE ESCALATIONS DUE TO DELAYS IN THE PROJECT PLUS
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION SERVICES
f t t t t f f f t f t t t t t t f
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional
Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Central
Laboratory, Job No. J-17; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 provided for additional engineering services to
accommodate proposed change in the location of the site of the laboratory and
other design and scope of work changes; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with
Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide for wage escalations due to delays in
the project plus construction management/inspection services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on
April 11, 1990, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for
said services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of
professional engineering and architectural services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated May 9, 1990, to that certain
agreement dated August 13, 1986, by and between County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 and Boyle Engineering Corporation, for
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM T10(d) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-I"
design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, providing for wage escalations due
to delays in the project plus construction management/inspection services, is
hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount
not to exceed $156,160.00 as follows, which increases the total authorized
compensation from $329,105.00 to an amount not to exceed $491,703.00:
Existing Change per Amended
Agreement Addendum No. 2 Agreement
Professional Services, at
hourly rates for labor
plus overhead at 155.5%.
not to exceed $270,960 $ 6,438 $277,418
Direct Expenses,
not to exceed 5,000 -0- 5,000
Subconsultant Fees,
not to exceed 12,750 -0- 12,750
Fixed Profit 40,395 -0- 40,395
SUBTOTALS $329,105 $ 6,438 $335,543
Construction Management/
Inspection Services, at
hourly rates for labor
including overhead and
profit ($80/hour) ,
not to exceed -0- $156,160 $156,160
TOTALS Im.105 $162,598 $491,703
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in farm approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990.
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-42
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM, INC. FOR TECHNICAL
AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT SERVI E
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH K. P. LINDSTROM, INC. FOR TECHNICAL AND
ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT SERVICES RE 1969 COLLECTION,
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN EIR
AND OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION,
PROVIDING FOR REALLOCATION OF COSTS AMONG CATEGORIES
WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional
Services Agreement with K. P. Linstrom, Inc. for technical and environmental
support services relative to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan Environmental Impact Report and Ocean Discharge Permit
renewal application; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with K. P.
Lindstrom Inc. to provide for a reallocation of the costs among the categories
within said agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated May 9, 1990, to that certain
agreement dated October 14, 1987, by and between County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 and K. P. Lindstrom, Inc., for technical
and environmental support services relative to the 1989 Collection, Treatment
and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Environmental Impact Report and Ocean
Discharge Permit renewal application, providing for a reallocation of the costs
among categories within said agreement, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
"H-1" AGENDA ITEM k10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1"
Section 2. That said reallocation shall be as follows and shall not
change the maximum authorized compensation of $304,000.00:
Existing Change per Amended
Agreement Addendum No. 1 Agreement
Professional Services, at
hourly rates for labor,
not to exceed $280,000 $(7,000) $273,000
Direct Expenses,
not to exceed 24,000 7,000 31,000
TOTALS $304,000 -0- $304,000
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990.
"H-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
COWTy SAN1 mn N DISTRICTS OE' CRANC,E COUNTY Page 1 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ET-1 AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIECI rA 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. O. NO. Six (6)
CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE Mav 9. 1990
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Pdincer Avenue and Ia:mson
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27
Amwmt of this Change Order (Add) (D ) $ 77,778.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Contract No. 2-26-2
Item 1 ADDITIONAL WATER LINE VALVES FOR THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
The Contractor was directed to supply and install four 8-inch butterfly valves for
the water line on Taft Street. The City of Garden Grove requested that we have
the Contractor install the valves in conjunction with the relocation of the Taft
Street water main. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,760.00
TDE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 8-INCH WATER LINE NOT LOCATED AS SHOWN
The Contractor encountered an existing 8-inch water line located on the centerline
of our proposed 8-inch VCP sewer line. The water line was shown to be 6 feet away
from the proposed sewer line. The Contractor was directed to install a temporary
water line to provide water service to an apartment conplex while the 8-inch water
line was relocated. The 8-inch cater line had to be relocated in order to
construct the new 8-inch sewer line. This item was accomplished by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Prwisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE WIDER ITEM: $ 6,870.00
TIM EXTENSION THIS CHANGE WIDER MEN: 2 Calendar Days
"J-1'" AGENDA ITEM a10( j ) - DISTRICT 2 "J-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 �
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 m.ISS AVENUE
FaWIAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Six 161
CONPRACI10R: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE Mav 9. 1990
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lamson
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27
Item 3 RIIACATE UTILITIES ON NELSON STREET
The Contractor was directed to relocate or support various utilities on Nelson
Street. Existing power poles, fire hydrants, water meters and gas meters were to
be relocated by others due to proposed street widening prior to the construction
of our 54-inch RCP sewer line. However, the City did not widen the street or
relocate the utilities prior to the sewer line construction. The utilities had to
be relocated before the sewer could be carpleted. This item was accarplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 33,004.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
Item 4 WATER I.rwE DELAY
An existing 14-inch water line was to be relocated per contract in order to
construct the new 54-inch sewer line. The water line located at the intersection
of Taft Avenue and Trask Avenue was required to be shut off while the relocation
proceeded. The City of Garden Grove could not shut the 14-inch water line off
because of a valve malfunction. The Contractor was delayed portions of two days
while waiting to proceed with the work. The standby delays are authorized the
Contractor pursuant to Section 6-4 of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,760.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day
Item 5 ADDITIONAL PROJECT SIGNS
The Contractor was directed to provide six additional project information signs in
an effort to reduce the potential for accidents on the many streets which were
affected by the sewer line construction. This item was acca pushed by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,340.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Day,
"J-2" AGENDA ITEM #10( J ) - DISTRICT 2 "J-2"
COUNTY SnrT=CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FT.T S AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Six (6)
CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE May 9, 1990
JOB: Portion of Euclid interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lamson
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27
Item 6 WISCLOSE'D SnRT.JTIES
The Contractor encountered several undisclosed utilities at various locations
while excavating for the new sewer line. The Contractor was directed to
investigate and excavate around the undisclosed utilities and to make the
necessary repairs. Following is a tabulation of the additional work:
Location (Sta. No.) Utility Amount
112+35 4-inch sewer lateral $ 856.00
112+38 Abandoned sewer wet well 1,378.00
10+65 Electrical conduit for
traffic signals 805.00
23+70 PACTEL duct bank 17,889.00
24+16 30-inch storm drain 547.00
37+00 30-inch stone drain 1,376.00
40+14 4-inch %ater Line 3,897.00
44+35 30-inch storm drain 1,367.00
45+57 6-inch water line fire
service 1,206.00
49+90 6-inch water line fire
service 723.00
$ 30,044.00
This item was accomplished by Contractor's force amount pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 30,044.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days
"J 3" AGENDA ITEM #10( I ) - DISTRICT 2 "J-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISMICPS OF ORANGE COL= Page 4 of 5 -�
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RUT S AVENUE
FOOLPAIN VALLEY, OUaFaUM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. ND. Six (6)
CONPRACIOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE May 9, 1990
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Ianmson
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27
TOTAL ADDED CST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 77,778.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 14 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perfosed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time nade by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 14 days' extension
of time to pert= the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SLVt4V OF COSIRFLT TIME
Original Contract Date March 22, 1989
Original Contract Time 365 Calendar Days
Original Ccupletion Date March 22, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 14 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 61 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 426 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date May 22, 1990
Actual Final Caquletion Date Not applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not applicable
Original Contract Price $ 9,242,538.00
Prev. Aith. Changes $ 415,409.00
This Change (Add) (SadusC) $ 77,778.00
Amended Contract Price S 9,735,725.00
`a✓
"J-4" AGENDA ITEM #10( j ) - DISTRICT 2 "J-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
EYIDNPAIN VALLEY, CALUF RNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Six (6)
CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE Nay 9, 1990
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Iamson
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27
Board Authorization Date: May 9, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIEOPNIA
FWROENDED BY:
cautruction Manager Date
W. B. ESERT CORP.
ACCBPTE BY: APPROVED-BY:
Lam- i'
u 11 7 90
ntracta Date Dizectox of Engineering Date
"J-5" AGENDA ITEM #10( i ) DISTRICT 2 "J-5"
COMM SANr CN4 DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COWY Page 1 of 2
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECT,TC AVENDE
FSXX7MIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (11
CONTRACTOR: National Plant Services, Inc. DATE May 9, 1990
JOB: Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, between 32nd Street and Coronado
Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway
Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2
Mount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 1,305.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Contracts Nos. 5-27-1 and 5-37-2
Item 1 TIME EXTENSION
The Contractor requested a time extension to the contract. The Contractor was
doing emergency sewer damage investigation and repairs in San Francisco as a
result of the earthquake. All of the Contractor's forces were mobilized to help
in getting the sewers repaired and back into full service. It was determined to
be in the best interest of the Districts and the public to delay the start of
construction until the Contractor could be relieved of the emergency work in
San Francisco. The time extension is authorized pursuant to Section 6-4 of the
General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER TTEM: $ 0.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHAR ORDER ITEM: 60 Calendar Days
Contract No. 5-37-2
Item 2 ADDITIONAL VIDEO INSPECTION
The Contractor was directed to extend the limit of video taping from Manhole
No. 44 to Manhole No. 45 and from Manhole No. 45 to Manhole No. 46 which is an
additional 660 linear feet of video inspection. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,305.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Tice made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 60 days' extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #10( I ) ( 1 ) - DISTRICTS 5 a 6 "K-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMM Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 WELTS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALTFORKM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. W. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: National Plant Services, Inc. DATE Mav 9, 1990
JOB: Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, between 32nd Street and Coronado
Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investwation of Pacific Coast Richwav
Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date December 4, 1989
Original Corpletion Date February 1, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 60 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 60 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 120 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date April 2, 1990
Actual Final Ca:pletion Date April 2, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 108,321.40
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 1,305.00
Amended Contract Price $ 109,626.40
Board Authorization Date: May 9, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
BY:
Construction Manager Date
NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES, INC.
ACCEPTED BY: A BY:i
Contractor Date Director of Engineering Date
"K-2" AGENDA ITEM #10( 1 ) (1 ) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "K-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-50
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NOS. 5-27-1 AND 5-37-2
AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING REHABILITATION OF BALBOA TRUNK
SEWER, BETWEEN 32ND STREET AND CORONADO STREET, CONTRACT
NO. 5-27-1, AND INVESTIGATION OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-2, AS COMPLETE AND
APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 5 and 6 of
Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, National Plant Services, Inc. , has
completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for
Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado Street,
Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer,
Contract No. 5-37-2. on March 14, 1990; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street
and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast
Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2, is hereby accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated December 4, 1989;
and,
Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby
"L-1" AGENDA ITEM .#100 ) ( 2) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "L-1"
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section S. That the Final Closeout Agreement with National Plant
Services, Inc., setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of
Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado Street,
Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer,
Contract No. 5-37-2, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the
General Counsel ; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 5, acting for
Itself and on behalf of District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to
execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990.
L-2' AGENDA ITEM #100 ) (2) - DISTRICTS 5 8 6 „L-2^
RESOLUTION NO. 90-51-7
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 (ANNEXATION NO. 129 -
GARRETT ANNEXATIUN) �./
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 129 - GARRETT
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That a request has heretofore been made to County Sanitation
District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a
petition filed by the property owners, Milton Garrett and Rex L. Xanders; and,
Section 2. That the designation assigned by the District to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 129 - Garrett Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described on
Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a
part of this resolution; and.
Section 3. That pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the
California Government Code, application has heretofore been made by District
No. 7 to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory
to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of Resolution No. 89-26-7, filed
with said Commission by said District; and,
Section 4. That the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of
Orange adopted its Resolution No. 90-08 on March 7, 1990, making determinations
and approving proposed Annexation No. 129 to County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California, without notice or hearing and without election; and,
Section 5. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited;
and,
"M-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(m) - DISTRICT 7 "M 1"
Section 6. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and
provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,
`..� Section 7. That payment of annexation acreage fees in the amount of
$9,339.07 has been made and all terms and conditions specified by the Local
Agency Formation Commission have been satisfied; and,
Section 8. That the District has agreed, pursuant to Section 99(h)(1) of
the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation
exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and,
Section 9. That the regular County assessment roll is utilized by this
District; and,
Section 10. That the affected territory will be taxed for the existing
bonded indebtedness of District No. 7; and,
Section 11. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency
Formation Commission pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, Section 56837 of the California
Government Code, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described
hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District
No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election; and,
Section 12. That the Secretary of District No. 7 transmit a certified copy
of this resolution, with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the
Government Code, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Orange County.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990.
"M-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(m) - DISTRICT 7 "M-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-52-7
APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH
GEORGE ADAMS, JR. RE SEWER LINE IN BAJA far/
PANORAMA STREET SERVING SIX LOTS WITHIN
TRACT NO. 939
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT WITH GEORGE ADAMS, JR. RE SEWER
LINE IN BAJA PANORAMA STREET SERVING SIX
LOTS LOCATED WITHIN TRACT NO. 939
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Reimbursement Agreement for Sewer Line in
Baja Panorama Street dated February 1, 1990, by and between County Sanitation
District No. 7 and George Adams, Jr. (developer) , providing for the District to
reimburse the developer for a proportional share of his cost of constructing a
sewer line in Baja Panorama Street, which will serve six lots located within
Tract No. 939, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That reimbursement of said proportional share of the costs to
developer, based on $8,257.00 per lot for Lots 7 and 9, (Lot 8 is owned by
developer and developer has received reimbursement from the owners of Lots 10,
11 and 12) is hereby authorized to be made in accordance with the terns and
conditions of said Reimbursement Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in
form approved by the General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990.
"N '" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) - DISTRICT 7 "N"
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.
ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
REGULATIONS FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE
FACILITIES, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO._
+ + x + + x + + x + x x
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No._ of
Orange County, California, does hereby FIND:
A. That a Comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital
Facilities entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan-1989", hereinafter the "Master Plan", which includes
detailed financial and engineering reports has been prepared,
approved and adopted by the Board of Directors setting forth and
identifying the required future development of District and jointly
owned facilities, including the financial projections for providing
sewer service to all properties within the District service area;
and,
B. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master
Plan have been made available to the public and been subject to
noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of
Government Code Section 54992 and other provisions of law; and,
C. That the adoption of the proposed Capital Facilities
connection charges will provide revenue to assist in the financing
of Capital Facilities identified in the adopted Master Plan and
deemed necessary to maintain service within the existing service
area; and,
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(a) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11&13 110-11,
D. That the change in rate structure will not necessarily --
result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside
the existing service area. The adoption of these rates will not
result in any specific project nor result in a direct physical
change in the environment; and,
E. That the District has, on July 19, 1989, adopted a Final
Program Environmental Impact Report in accordance with legally
required notices and public hearing, relating to the Master Plan
including the financial program to implement the construction of
capital facilities identified in the Master Plan; and,
F. That the District either has or will produce Negative
Declarations, Environmental Impact Reports or other CEQA compliance
prior to the construction of any capital improvement project
planned for in the District's adopted Master Plan; and,
G. That the proposed increases in the capital facilities
connection charges are established upon a rational basis between
the fees charged each customer and the service and facilities
provided to each new customer to the District; and,
H. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt
under the California Environmental Quality Act from further
environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California
Public Resources Code Section 21080(b) ( 8) and California Code of
Regulations Section 15273 (a) (4 ) ; and,
I . That the new capital facilities connection fees established
by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to
provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided
"0-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(a) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11313 "0 2"
`.►� in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992.
NOW, THEREFORE, The Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. _of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as
follows:
Section 1. Section No. 702 of Ordinance No. is hereby
amended to read:
'1702. DISTRICT NO. 1 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
A. District Connection Permit Required
No application for a permit for a connection to a
District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility
which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall
be considered until a District connection charge is paid
by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued
unless there is an established use of the property to be
served or a valid building permit issued which establishes
the use of said property.
B. District Capital Facilities Connection Charge Amounts
The following District connection charges are hereby
established commencing January 1, 1990, and shall be paid
to the District or to an agency designated by the
District:
( 1 ) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction
dwelling buildings:
For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $2,280 per
dwelling unit.
"0-3" AGENDA ITEM #14(a ) - DISTRICTS 1, 2,3,5,6 ,7,11&13 "C-3"
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing
dwelling buildings:
For the connection of each existing dwelling
building, the capital facilities connection charge
shall be $2,280 per dwelling unit.
(3 ) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction and existing structures, other than
dwelling buildings:
For all other new construction, including but not
limited to commercial and industrial buildings,
hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $460 per 1, 000
square feet of floor area contained within such
construction, provided that the minimum connection
charge for such new construction shall be $2 ,280 .
(4 ) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement
buildings:
For new construction replacing former buildings, the
capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in
Paragraphs 1 and 3 above. If such replacement
construction is commenced within two years after
demolition or destruction of the former building, a
credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall
"0-4" AGENDA ITEM #14(a) - DISTRICTS 1 ,2,3,5,6,7,11313 110-4"
be the equivalent connection charge for the building
being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the
basis of current charges for new construction. In no
case shall such credit exceed the connection charge.
(5) Capital Facilities connection charges for additions
or alterations of existing buildings:
In the case of structures where further new
construction or alteration is made to increase the
occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of
buildings to be used for other than family dwelling
buildings, the capital facilities connection charge
shall be $2,280 for each dwelling unit added or
created, and, in the case of new construction other
than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $460 per
1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained
within such new construction, provided such new
construction shall contain additional plumbing
fixture units.
C. Annual Adjustment of Charges
Each year, commencing on July 1, 1990, and continuing
thereafter on each July 1, the capital facilities
connection fee shall be adjusted by an increment
based on the change in the ENR Construction Cost
Index for Los Angeles over the prior year, and
rounded to the nearest $10 .
"0-5" AGENDA ITEM t�14(a) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3.5.6,7, 11813 "0-5"
i
However, the District Board of Directors may at its
option determine, by resolution adopted prior
thereto, that such adjustment shall not be effective
for the next succeeding year, or may determine other
amounts, as appropriate. "
Section 2. Fees established by Section 702 shall be effective
July 11, 1990.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective July 11, 1990.
Section 4. Ordinance No. _ is hereby repealed.
Section 5. If any provision or Section of this Ordinance is
declared to be unlawful, invalid, or in any manner unenforceable,
then each and every other provision herein shall remain in force as
though enacted independently.
Section 6. The Secretary of the Board is hereby directed to
certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation within the County.
"0-G" AGENDA ITEM "14(a) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 , 11&13 "J-5"
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No.—of Orange County, California, at a
regular meeting held May 9, 1990,
Chairman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. _
of Orange County, California
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. _
of Orange County, California
i
"0
"0-7" AGENDA ITEM 914(a) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11813
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. _ OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.
ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
CHARGES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. - of
Orange County, California, does hereby FIND:
A. That a Comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital
Facilities entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan - 1989" , hereinafter the "Master Plan" , which includes
detailed financial and engineering reports, has been prepared,
approved and adopted by the Board of Directors setting forth and
identifying the required future development of District and
jointly-owned facilities, including the financial projections for
providing sewer service to all properties within the District
service area; and
B. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master
Plan have been made available to the public and been subject to
noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of
Government Code Section 54992 and other provisions of law; and,
i
C. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this
Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction,
reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the sewage collection
facilities, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the
District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments or
to repay Federal or State loans issued for the construction and
"P-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(a ) - DISTRICTS 1.3.5,6.11 & 13 "P 1"
reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of
�./
administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and,
D. That the properties upon which the fees established by
this Ordinance are levied, discharge wastewater to the District' s
collection, treatment and disposal facilities. The costs of
operating and maintaining said facilities has constantly increased
due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the
treatment process, and said costs now exceed the amounts of any ad
valorem tax revenues received from said properties; and,
E. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all
wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities is
required to protect the public health and safety to preserve the
environment without danger; and,
F. That the new fees established by this Ordinance do not
exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service
for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code
Sections 54991 and 54992; and,
G. That the change in rate structure will not necessarily
result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside
the existing service area. The adoption of these rates will not
result in any specific project nor result in a direct physical
change in the environment; and,
H. That the District has, on July 19, 1989, adopted a Final
Program Environmental Impact Report in accordance with legally
required notices and public hearing, related to the Master Plan,
including the financial program; and,
"P-2" AGENDA ITEM .#15(a) - DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13 "P-2"
I. That the proposed increases in the sewer service charges
are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each
customer and the service and facilities provided to each new
customer to the District; and,
J. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt
under the California Environmental Quality Act from further
environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California
Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)( 8 ) and California Code of
Regulations Sections 15273(a) .
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No._of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Section 1 of Ordinance No. is hereby amended
to read:
"Section 1: Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is
to amend the established system of sanitary sewer service
charges required to be paid by property owners for the
services and facilities furnished by the District in
connection with its sanitation treatment works and sewage
collection system.
Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance
shall be used for the acquisition, construction,
reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the sewage
collection facilities, wastewater treatment and disposal
facilities of the District; to repay principal and
interest on debt instruments or to repay Federal or State
loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of
"P-3" AGENDA ITEM #15(e) - DISTRICTS 1 .3 ,5 ,6,11 E 13 "P-3"
said sewerage facilities, together with costs of
administration and provisions for necessary reserves. "
Section 2: Section 2 of Ordinance No. is hereby amended
to read:
"Section 2: Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge.
Commencing July 1, 1990, each parcel of real property
located within the District which is improved with
structures designed for residential, commercial or
industrial use and connected to the District's system,
shall pay a sanitary sewer service charge based on the
average volume of wastewater discharged by a class of
users in the sum or sums as set forth in Table A of this
Ordinance. "
Section 3: If any provision of this Ordinance or the
application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by order
of court, . the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of
such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not
be affected.
Section 4: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become
effective July 1, 1990.
Section 5: Ordinance No. is hereby repealed.
Section 6: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published
in a newspaper of general circulation in the District, as required
by law.
"P-4" AGENDA ITEM #15(a) - DISTRICTS 1 ,3,5,5, 11 & 13 "P 4"
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of greater than ,-
two-thirds of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. _ of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held
Chairman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. of
Orange County, California
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. _
of Orange County, California
( b\l .rr)
"P-5" AGENDA ITEM N15(a) - DISTRICTS 1.3,5,6,11 & 13 "P-5"
TABLE A
ORDINANCE NO. 116
1990-91 Minimum Annual
Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit
Single-Family Charge Per $55.00 $55.00
Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit
Condominiums
Multi-Family Charge Per $33.00 $33.00
Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit
Home/Apartments
Commercial/ Charge per 1, 000 $39.00 $39.00
Industrial/Other square feet of
(government building
buildings,
utilities
nonprofit
organizations,
etc. )
"P-6" AGENDA ITEM #15(a) - DISTRICT 1 "P-6"
TABLE A
ORDINANCE NO. 314
1990-91 Minimum Annual
Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit
single-Family Charge Per $50.00 $30.00
Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit
Condominiums
Multi-Family Charge Per $30.00 $30.00
Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit
Home/Apartments
Commercial/ Charge per 1, 000 $36. 00 $36.00
Industrial/Other square feet of
(government building
buildings,
utilities
nonprofit
organizations,
etc. )
°R-7^ AGENDA ITEM #15(a) DISTRICT 3 �-7"
TABLE A
ORDINANCE NO. 523
1990-91 Minimum Annual
Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit
Single-Family Charge Per $55 . 00 $55. 00
Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit
Condominiums
Multi-Family Charge Per $33 . 00 $33 .00
Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit
Home/Apartments
commercial/ Charge per 1,000 $39.00 $39. 00
Industrial/Other square feet of
(government building
buildings,
utilities
nonprofit
organizations,
etc.)
"P-8" AGENDA ITEM #15(a) - DISTRICT 5 "P 8"
TABLE A
ORDINANCE NO. 617
1990-91 Minimum Annual
Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit
Single-Family Charge Per $55.00 $55.00
Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit
Condominiums
Multi-Family Charge Per $33.00 $33 .00
Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit
Home/Apartments
Commercial/ Charge per 1,000 $39.00 $39.00
Industrial/Other square feet of
(government building
buildings,
utilities
nonprofit
organizations,
etc. )
"P-9" AGENDA ITEM #15(a) DISTRICT 6 "P-O"
TABLE A
ORDINANCE NO. 1113
1990-91 Minimum Annual
Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit
Single-Family Charge Per $50. 00 $50.00
Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit
Condominiums
Multi-Family Charge Per $30. 00 $30.00
Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit
Home/Apartments
Commercial/ Charge per 1,000 $36. 00 $36.00
Industrial/Other square feet of
(government building
buildings,
utilities
nonprofit
organizations,
etc. )
"P-10" AGENDA ITEM #15(a) - DISTRICT 11 "P-10"
b.d
TABLE A
ORDINANCE NO. 1308
1990-91 Minimum Annual
Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit
Single-Family Charge Per $95.00 $95.00
Dwellings/ Dwelling Unit
Condominiums
Multi-Family Charge Per $57 . 00 $57.00
Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit
Home/Apartments
Commercial/ Charge per 1,000 $68.00 $68.00
industrial/Other square feet of
(government building
buildings,
utilities
nonprofit
organizations,
etc. )
"P-11" AGENDA ITEM =15(2) - DISTRICT 13
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO
COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 1990-91
PROPERTY TAX
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE
CHARGES ON THE 1990-91 PROPERTY TAX BILLS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ has
heretofore adopted Ordinance No. _, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. _ Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing
Ordinance No. and,
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such
charges, as adopted by. District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax
roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together
with and not separate from, its general taxes.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. _ of Orange County, California.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to California Health 6 Safety Code Section 5473,
the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer
service charges, as established by Ordinance No. _, on the 1990-91 property
tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as,
together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer
service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year
thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this resolution remains
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM 916 - DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13 110-11,
in effect; and,
Section 2. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473,
this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed
or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by
Ordinance No. _, is changed; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and
directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order
set forth in Section 1 herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990.
"0 2" AGENDA ITEI`1 »16 - DISTRICTS 1 ,3,5.6,11 & 13 "0-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
EI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
May 1, 1990
+GBwF EuiE cvEW E
FOWF)YN V<LIFv.CaIIFOIINia 92)38-E+3)
n+aresa.aan
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11
STAFF REPORT
Slater Avenue Pop Station
Sewage System L%zovements
Contract No. 11-17
I. SUMMARY
The Slater Avenue Pimp Station Sewage System Inprovements Project Report
has been completed. The report has a number of rec®mendations, including
diversion of flow, upgrading existing sewers, construction of a new pimp
station and exchange of capacity in some existing g facilities between
Districts 3 and 11. The report estimates the total project cost to be
$17,981,000 shared by both Districts 3 ($1,050,000) and 11 ($16,931,000).
Enclosed is a copy of the report prepared by John Carollo Engineers.
II. BACKGROUND
County Sanitation District 11 is split into two separate drainage
areas. The southerly portion drains through the existing reaches of the
Coast Trunk Sewer directly to Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach.
The northwesterly portion, bounded by Cothatd Street on the east side and
the San Diego Freeway on the north, including the Huntington Harbour area,
drains to the Slater Avenue Pump Station between Goldenwest Street and
Gothard Street, which lifts water over the Huntington Beach mesa easterly
to the Knott interceptor (owned by Districts 3 and 11) and the
Interplant Interceptor, owned jointly with all Districts, and then to
Treatment Plant No. 2.
For marry years, the extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer system and a new
pimp station in Bolsa Chica were planned to serve the north Huntington
Beach area, replacing the Slater Avenue Pun Station. Early studies were
based on the assumption that the boundaries of District 11 and the City
of Huntington Beach boundaries would be coteminous. However, Huntington
Reach first developed in a northeasterly direction and that portion of the
City is now, in District 3. In the early 19601s, the boundaries were
extended westerly to include the Huntington Harbour area.
Periodic, updated Master Plans have been the basis for orderly develoment
of the District's sewerage system since the District was forTed. The 1982
Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts 2, 3 and 11, as
well as the earlier District 11 Master Plan provided for the construction
of the Coast Trunk Sewer. In 1979, the first leg of the Coast Trunk Sewer
was built, extending frost Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Peach,
northwesterly to Lake Street at walnut Avenue. This project was soon
followed by the Newland Interceptor, cospletion of which allowed the
\J Hamilton Avenue Pomp Station, located at Newland and Hamilton Avenues, to
"R-1" AGENDA ITEM #33(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "R-1"
May 1, 1990
Page Two
be abandoned and also relieved the Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer and
Atlanta Interceptor Sewer. The Coast Trunk Sewer was extended to
Goldenwest Street at Orange Avenue in 1983.
Planned future extensions of the Coast Trunk Sewer included a routing
through Sea Cliff and Bolsa Chica (where the Bolsa Chica Puny Station
would have been constructed) to Slater Avenue at Edwards Street and
northerly in Edwards Street. This would allow the Slater Avenue Punp
Station to be abandoned upon the completion of the Coast Trunk Sewer
System.
In 1987, the peak discharge from the Slater Avenue Pump Station reached
20 million gallons a day, the apprcxi, to design flaw. At that time, all
five pumps were required to handle the flows. The fifth pump, which
would normally be a standby pump, now runs about five percent of the
time. Staff is concerned about the reliability of this essential service
facility with the continuing and increasing depends being placed on the
Slater Avenue Pump Station. If two pumps were out-of-service, the
station would be seriously overloaded. The Districts, Maintenance
Division is currently providing extra monitoring of this station to
ensure continual operation, and has installed an on-site, standby power
generator.
Construction of Master-Planned facilities to relieve these deficiencies
has been delayed pending an agreement on annexation of the Soles, Chico to
District 11.
1989 MPSTFR PLAN
The 1989 Master Plan found that most of the existing facilities in the
northerly portion of District 11 would be deficient for meeting both
short and long-term capacity requirements.
The Master Plan identified potential areas which may annex to the
District, including the Sunset Beach Sanitary District service area and
the Bolsa Chica. While no new facilities would be required to serve the
Sunset Beach area, in the analysis of the systems the Master Plan
reccnuended facilities to serve the presently undeveloped Bolsa Chico
area.
The southeasterly area sewage conveyance system is still centered around
the Coast Trunk and its collection from the Iake Avenue, Atlanta Avenue
and Newland Street Interceptors. No sewage diversion points exist within
this system.
The Master Plan studies reviewed several alternatives to serve the
northwest portion of District 11, and a large, soon to be developed
adjacent portion of District 3. Instead of extending the Coast Trunk
system as previously planned, the Master Plan found the rebuilding of the
Slater Avenue Pump Station system to be the less costly.
"R-2" AGENDA ITEM #33(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "R-2"
may 1, 1990
V Page Three
The deficiencies identified in the Master Plan for the northwesterly
portion of District 11 were evaluated on a system-wide rather than
compcnent-oriented approach and three conprehensive alternative operation
and imp rDVedlent plans were developed and compared on a cost basis. The
alternatives were: 1) To upgrade the identified deficient trunks and
construct a new Slater Avenue Pump Station and Force Main; 2) To extend
the Coast Trunk system northward to intercept flows including construction
of a Bolsa Chica Pump Station near the westerly boundary of the southern
portion of District 11 (the original, earlier plan); and 3) To intercept
flows in the north of District 11 along tMFadden Avenue and construct a
new "MrHadden Pump Station" which world pimp to the Miller-Holder Trunk.
The alternative to iqurove the existing system and build a new Slater
Avenue Pump Station (Alternative 1) proved to be the most cost-effective.
The follu ing summarizes the Master Planned improvements needed to
implement this alternative:
" The Slater-Springdale Trunk requires a replacement sewer between
Edinger and K-Fadden Avenues.
" Replacement of the deteriorated and deficient Goldenwest Trunk with
a 36- to 39-inch diameter sever between the Slater Avenue Pnmgp
Station and Heil Avenue.
" A 33-inch diameter interceptor is needed to extend westward along Heil
Avenue to Springdale Street.
" A reach of 12-inch diameter sewer is required to replace the
northerly portion of the Goldenwest Trunk between Heil and Edinger
Avenues.
° Relief trunks of 24- to 27-inch diameter are required along Warner
Avenue between Bolsa Chica Road and Springdale Street.
° The Nichols Street Trunk requires a 27-inch diameter replacement
sewer.
' The portion of the Slater Trunk between Nichols Street and the Knott
Interceptor at Newland Street requires a 30- to 33-inch diameter
relief parallel sewer.
" The existing Edinger PwT Station will require improvements to
increase its capacity.
The Master Plan also concluded that a portion of the flu✓ fray the
Slater Avenue system should be diverted to the Miller-Holder Trunk at
Nichols Avenue by upgrading a portion the existing Nichols Street
Trunk in order to maximize the use of the existing lines in Slater Avenue
and capacity in both the Miller-Holder Trunk and Knott Interceptor.
"R-3" AGENDA ITEM "33(b) - DISTRICTS 3 3 11 "R-5"
May 1, 1990
Page Four
III. PRQ7ECr REPDRT - Slater Avenue Pt= Station System
In order to carry out the Master Plan, the Directors authorized John
Carollo Engineers to prepare a Phase I, Preliminary Project Report for
Slater Avenue Amp Station Sewage System Improverents. The study area,
smaller than the Master Plan study area, is shown on Figure 2-1, attached.
The Project Report confinned the 1989 Master Plan and included studies
detailing the size and construction requirements of the pump station, size
and preliminary plan and profiles for trunk sewer inprovenents both to and
from the station, necessary data for acquisition of a site from GTE, and
the preparation of a financial analysis of cost sharing between Districts
3 and 11.
The Project Report contains the following recamendations:
A. Sewerage to the Amp Station
1. The existing Slater-Springdale Relief Trunk should be relieved
by diverting 6.55 mgd to new 27-inch and 36-inch sewers in Heil
Avenue flawing east to Goldenwest Street (Heil Avenue
Interceptor. ) (In addition, a relief line between Edinger
Avenue end McFadden Avenue is needed in the future, per the
Master Plan.)
2. The existing 12- and 15-inch Goldenwest Trunk Sewer, in need of
replacement for both capacity and structural reasons, should be
removed and replaced in the same location in Goldenwest Street
between Heil Avenue and Slater Avenue with a new 42-inch diameter
serer. (In addition, per the Master Plan, the line will need
to be replaced in the future between Heil Avenue and Edinger
Avenue.)
3. The existing influent pipe on Slater Avenue from Goldenwest
Street easterly should be paralled with a new 42-inch diameter
sewer to a point 180 feet just upstream of the pimp station,
and a 72-inch diameter sewer to the nev pimp station should
constructed.
4. A new pimp station with adequate vehicular access should be
constructed just east of the existing station.
B. Sewerage from the Amp Station
1. Construct a new 36-inch diameter ductile iron pipe force main
in Slater Avenue from the pmp station to Gothard Street.
2. Construct a new 36-inch diameter gravity sewer in Slater Avenue
between Gothard Street and Nichols Street.
"R-4" AGENDA ITEM `33(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "R-LI"
May 1, 1990
Page Five
3. Divert 5.4 sgd (average flow) from the Miller-Holder trunk to the
Nichols Street Gravity Sewer.
4. Construct a parallel 33-inch diameter relief sewer in Slater
Avenue from Koledo Iane to Beach Boulevard and a parallel
36-inch diameter sewer from Beach Boulevard to Newland Street.
Table 6-1 (attached) shows the proposed cost sharing for the above
projects based on approval of a preannexation agreemart for Bolsa Chica.
If the Bolsa Chica area does not sewer through the Slater Avenue Sewage
System, total project cost will show a decrease, and the cost-sharing
fonmla will change.
This Project Report Scope did not include a detailed analysis of the
relief line in Warner Avenue between Springdale Street and Bolsa Chico
Road. The report also found that the upgrading of the Nichols Avenue
Trunk Sewer, identified in the Master Plan, would not be required at this
time.
The new pump station is planned to be constructed adjacent to the existing
station. Since it will be larger than the existing station, a larger
site is needed. The land is owned by General Telephone and Electronics
(GTE) and used as an employee parking lot. Proposed is a negotiated land
purchase and exchange, whereby the existing site is deeded to GIE upon
completion of the new pump station, and the increase in site square
footage paid for on the basis of a negotiated price.
IV. PROMCT COST FOR NEW FAC=IES
The inprovmeats described in the Project Report to alleviate the
deficiencies are either solely District 11 facilities or jointly
shared facilities of Districts 3 and 11 and as such a project
cost-split was made on a projected average flow basis. The following
sumrarizes that analysis of both new and existing facilities.
"R-5" AGENDA ITEM #33(h) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "R-5"
may 1, 1990
Page Six
COST AL1OC=ON FOR NEW IMPROVEMENTS*
Project District 3 District 11
Item Cost Cost Cost
Neil Avenue
Interceptor (3) $ 3,484,000 0 $ 3,484,000
Goldenwest Trunk Sewer (2) 4,302,000 0 4,302,000
Slater Avenue Pump
Station Influent
Relief Sewer (1) 737,000 261,000 476,000
Slater Avenue Force
Main/Gravity Seder/
Diversion Structure (1) 1,141,000 131,200 1,009,800
Slater Avenue Relief
Seders (3) 2,597,000 0 2,597,000
Slater Avenue Pump
Station/72-Inch
Influent (1) 5,720,000 657,800 5,062,200
TOTAL $17,981,000 $1,050,000 $16,931,000
NOTE: Nos. 1, 2 and 3 identify priority rating.
*Additional, longer-range needs were not includeed in the Project Report study
area.
1..)
"R-6" AGENDA ITEM �33(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "R-6"
TABLE 6-1
PROJECT COST SPLIT
NEW n&PROVEEIENTS
District District. District District
No. 3 No. 11 No. 3 .No. 11 District District
cDi Flow(2) Flow Share Share No. 3 No. 11
z IIeul Project Cost11) IMGD) IMGD) (40 M Cost Cost
ZV
a
y Ifell Avenue
m Inlerceplor $3,484,000 0 NA O 100 O $3.484,000
3
w Golden Wesl Tnnrk
W Sewer $ 4,302 000 0 NA 0 100 O $4.302,000
Q
Slater Avenue Pump
Slallon Influent
o Relief Sewer $ 737,000 2.33 4.26 35.4 64.6 $ 261.000 $ 476.000
N
� Staler Avelure Force
Main/Gravity Sewer/
r, Diversion Slmcture $ 1,141,000 2.33 17.94 11.5 88.5 $ 131,200 $ 1.009,800
--I
N
W Slater Avemic Relief
po Sewers $ 2.597.000 O NA 0 100 0 $ 2.597.000
r— Slater Avenue Pump
Slallon/72"
I11011enl $_5,720,000 2.33 17.94 11.5 88.5 $ 657.800 $5,062.200
$17.981,000 $1.050,000 $16.931.000
(1) Costs 3rd Quarter 1989
121 All flows average
10
I
` r
Legend C APPRAPPRORIYATE SCALESOALE
1~ 1 fl0[ . WW SANK,SYNIE
1 i3 1 N— 4nplerYnenM TO RNIINn
N 11 1 Ole (UM,50weY-Naw ems SPw,f -UK.rmm 6ar.M
n IW N 1 A.PI. 1 ———— SNIV Ave.
1611E1L AVENUE INTEACEPiOA _ __ Rp,.N •r YYW)bWI
m _ nu .._
Z 1 v' ae' ae' ' Fv � .PmMI arr NNC Wenagor
CJ
IL
n z� iQ oE� � 1 NeW New Fwu YM ••••••••••••• NpKNNe Ateel
m
NILI ER-IIIII OER TRUNK f SEWEA
CT
S.
rt la 'f pl
Y
_(Wq1 rY+R TI�YV9 SLrL"A'AGTTErErflA----SSYSPNiRI�INIWG�GRAiALIF E� �iAF`wRrWIE Kr SEWrEN I as N EW
:
_r_ aa'
PARALLEL
EL IiIIIIr ARALLEL
SLATER AME olvERT
PUMP STRUCTURE e f
� 1JL/ef
_�J
9IATI0N Y/
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
FIGURE.7-1
SLATER AVENUE PUUP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM WROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANIPIIOY OISTIUM
Of OR..OE COUNFY n�
N E'S
CD
RESOLUTION NO. 90-53
APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICTS 3 AND 11
RE JOINT SEWAGECOLLECTION A I
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICTS 3 AND 11, PROVIDING
FOR FINANCING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, CAPACITY
OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION OF CERTAIN MASTER-PLANNED
SEWAGE COLLECTION FACILITIES FOR SERVING
DISTRICTS 3 AND 11
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors, on July 19, 1989, approved and
adopted the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan dated
February 1989; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors, on May 9, 1990, approved and adopted a
Project Report relative to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System
Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, dated April 3, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, said Master Plan and Project Report set forth certain
master-planned joint sewage collection facilities required for serving portions
of Districts Nos. 3 and 11.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 3 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated by and between
County Sanitation District No. 3 and County Sanitation District No. 11,
providing for the financing, design, construction, capacity ownership and
operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities for serving
Districts Nos. 3 and 11, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That said Agreement provides for the joint construction of the
Slater Avenue Pump Station, including the Slater Avenue Pump Station Influent
`.d
"S-1" AGENDA ITEM �33(0) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "S-1"
Relief Sewer, Force Main, Gravity Sewer, and Diversion Structure; provides for
costs to be shared in proportion to average flow contribution resulting in
approximately 86.2% of the cost to be paid by District No. 11 and 13.8% to be
paid by District No. 3, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a
part of this resolution; and further provides that said ratio may be changed if
the flow ratio changes from that provided in the Project Report, to be
determined at the time final design is approved by the Boards of Directors; and,
Section 3. That said Agreement provides for the exchange of capacity in
existing sewer collection facilities, including the Newland-Delaware Trunk
Sewer, the Newland Street Interceptor, the Coast Trunk Sewer, Slater Avenue
Force Main, Nichols Street Gravity Sewer and Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, in
accordance with the previously-adopted capacity exchange formula, resulting in a
net buy-in cost for the sale of capacity from District No. 11 to District No. 3
in the amount of $630,836.00, as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and
made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 4. That the Chairmen and Secretary of Districts Nos. 3 and 11 are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990.
"S-2" AGENDA ITEM =33(d) - DISTRICTS 3 8 11 "S-2"
PIUM MINARY F TDffl TF OF
COST ATTl=0N FOR
SLATER AVENGE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSUM Dd'AOVQMTS
Project Dist. 3 Dist. 11
It® cost cost ($1 Cost (8)
Slater Avenue PuV
Station Influent
Relief Sewer $ 737,000 $261,000 (35.4%) $ 476,000 (64.6%)
Slates Avenue Force
Main/Gravity Sewer/
Diversion Strwture 1,141,000 131,200 (11.5%) 1,009,800 (88.5%)
Slater Avenue Pump
Station/72-Inch
Influent 5,720,000 657,800 (11.5%) 5,062.200 (88.5%)
TOM $7,598,000 $1,050,000 (13.8%) $6,548,000 (86.2%)
,"W/ EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 90-53
"S-3" AGENDA ITEM A33(0) - DISTRICTS 3 W 11 "S-3"
r
PROJECT BOY-M COSTS
Exisllna t)•1llu1rs1oi Y4 Neednl OwnershlD Bkl hhwdn Cmtl
Ugiuled District Dlslric( District District District District
Ileru Cost 3 11 3 11 3 II
n ISNHIA= 5766
m
m
z no 'LI-hair Slider
n Avenue Fm:c Moll 1) $ IBfialkl 0 Ilkl 11.5 88.5 $ 19.0m to
y Nichols Sirrrl
m —1 tirdvlly Sewn
3 MI1296.1:11121 $ 602.6(X) 0 1110 42.1 579 $254.0W O
it W
Wti Newl:uul/UrLnruu•/I:11
O. O uual Tl'unh Exclnuylc N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $563.036 II
a
� m Mllkrllukk:r
n O 9Yuuk Sewer $6.450.0D0 100 0 96.4 3.60 O $232_200
C
a CDTw als $663 036 $232.200
a
No Net Buy-in Cosl to District 3 $630.636 -
w
� O 111 (IIII)• IIII:Inde5111r 24'Iru hl fiuee Illnlll lhl:ll WIII (e1118111 kl yrNICC.
N
r'r 121 1,411 1:11 Is al Ailllcr-1 bldcr'D'uuk Sewer ui Nlclols Slmd.
13) Flom N911dan Ih•pm1
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 39 59 69 79 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
APRIL 11, 1990
Pp1iTlrloH
Y5 aopoliian Qo DIs,.
0
Si-c.1954 Y
gq 'GE CoVN�`
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, It, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on April 11, 1990, at 7:30 p.m.,
in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x Dan Griset, Chairman Dan Young
Richard B. Edgar, Chairman pro tem =Ursula Kennedy
=Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
x James A. Wahner _Orma Crank
DISTRICT NO. 2: x Roland E. Bigonger, Chai rumn _Henry W. Medea
x James Neal, Chairman pro in _George Scott
7--A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Herby
=Dan Griset Dan Young
William D. Mahoney =Beth Graham
=Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
7—Arthur G. Newton Norman Z. Eckenrode
_Bob Perry -7—Norman Culver
a Iry Pickier Fred Hunter
a Wayne Siltel _Harold Saldarini
x Oon E. Smith —Fred Barrera
=Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman Eva G. Miner
=Carrey Nelson, Chairman pro tan _Wayne Wedin
z Margaret M. Arnold _Cecilia L. Age
xWes Bannister Peter Green
x A.B. "Buck" Catlin __Chris Herby
=Norman Culver _Bob Perry
x Beth Graham _William D. Mahoney
-7—Don R. Griffin _Donna L. Chessen
7—Dan Griset _Dan Young
x James Neal _George Scott
a Iry Pickier Fred Hunter
7—J.R. 'Bob- Siefen __Dewey Wiles
=Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
x Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom
3 Paul Verellen —Edward L. Allen
=Edna Wilson _Victor Grgas
DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Ruthelyn Plumer
=Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem John C. Cox, Jr.
_Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman James M. Ferryman
_Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem -7—Evelyn Hart
_Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman Fred Barrera
Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tem z Ursula Kennedy
a John C. Cox, Jr. _Ruthelyn PIuner
=Dan Griset Dan Young
—Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton
=Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran
=James Wahner _Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tom Mays, Chairman Jim Silva
Grace Winchell, Chairman pro tan x Peter Green
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Media, Chairman Roland E. Bigonger
-7—Iry Pickier, Chairmen pro tom —Fred Hunter
Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton
=Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
Bayne Wedin x Carrey Nelson
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller
=Ursula Kennedy, Chairman pro tam Richard B. Edgar
Don R. Roth =_Roger Stanton
-7—Sally Anne Sheridan _Larry Agran
-7—Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
-2-
04/11/90
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Thomas
M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Mark Esquer,
Penny Kyle, John Linder, Rory Nelson,
Bob Ooten, Rich von Langan, Jack
Vincent
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Clark Ide, Jamel Demir, Bill Knopf,
Phil Stone, Jeff Lauria
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that
Repor of the Joint Chairman District No. 2 would be adjourning to
Wednesday, April 18th, at 7:30 p.m. ,
for a public hearing to be held at the Orange Public Library with regard to
use of the County of Orange property tax roll for billing of District sewer
service charges beginning July 1, 1990, and to consider adoption of the
District's 1990-91 annual sewer service charge report.
He also advised that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on
Thursday, April 19th, at 5:30 p.m.
Mr. Catlin then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday,
April 25th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Arthur Newton and Phil
Sansone to attend and participate in the discussions.
The Joint Chairman further reported that a Joint Works Selection Committee
meeting had been scheduled for Wednesday, April 25th, immediately following
the Executive Committee meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that
Report of the General Manager earlier that week he had transmitted
to the Directors, copies of
nominations submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District for
the SCAQMD 1990-91 Clean Air Awards, which included several of the
Districts' air quality programs. He noted that one of the Districts'
projects for air toxics and health risk assessment had recently been awarded
first place winner by the American Academy of Environmental Engineers in the
research category. The project was conducted by a team of staff members and
consultant Malcolm Pirnie.
The Director of Engineering then addressed the Board and reported on the
environmental award the Districts had recently received from the American
Academy of Environmental Engineers. Mr. Dawes reviewed various measures
taken by the Districts to ensure compliance with SCAQMD air quality
requirements in order to secure permits for expansion of the treatment
facilities at Plant No. 1. He advised that Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. had
designed the new covers for the primary basins at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 and the
foul air scrubber systems. The Districts had also directed the consultant
to study and determine whether the air toxics level had been reduced as a
result of the covering of the primary basins.
Mr. Dawes then introduced a representative of Malcom Pirnie, Mr. Jeff
Lauria. Mr. Lauria stated that this award was given for the best air toxics
and emissions project in the nation. He added that the Districts should
consider it a great honor to receive this environmental award.
-3-
04/11/90
He then gave a slide presentation showing the various projects and
facilities that have been constructed in order to comply with SCAQMD
requirements, including those projects which enabled the Districts to
receive the environmental award.
The Joint Chairman then accepted the award from Mr. Laurie on behalf of the
Boards of Directors and Districts' staff.
Chairman Catlin expressed the Boards' appreciation to the Districts' staff
and the consultant for their efforts in achieving this environmental award
and maintaining the Districts' reputation for excellence.
ALL DISTRICTS The Districts' General Counsel
Authorizing consideration of reported that the Districts had been
su le mental a enda item re Summons served with a Summons and Complaint
and omplaint, Recon teel Placers subsequent to the agenda being posted,
vs. Kiewit Pacific Co. , et al . , involving a subcontractor, Recon Steel
CaseN0. 620729, re Job NOS. P1-20 Placers, who had filed a Stop Notice
and PI-31 against the Districts' general
Contractor, Kiewit Pacific Co. , in
connection with Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-20, and
Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping
Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31. Because he
may be required to respond to said lawsuit prior to the May Board meeting,
the General Counsel advised that it would be necessary for the Board to
consider the matter that evening.
The General Counsel pointed out that because the proposed supplemental
agenda item was unable to be posted 72 hours prior to the meeting, the
Boards must vote on whether the matter should be considered prior to
actually voting on the recommended action. He noted that the decision by
the Boards to consider this matter must be adopted by a two-thirds vote of
those present.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a
supplemental agenda item relative to a Summons and Complaint (Action to
Enforce Notice to Withhold; Labor and Material Bond) , Recon Steel Placers
vs. Kiewit Pacific Co. , at al . , Case No. 620729, which was not posted
72 hours prior to the Board Meeting because the need to take action arose
subsequent to the agenda being posted.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Summons and om R nt
Recon Steel Placers vs. Kiewit Pacif c That the Summons and Complaint (Action
Co.. at al. Case No. re to Enforce Notice to Withhold; Labor
Job Nos. P1- 0 and P1- 1 and Material Bond) , Recon Steel
Placers vs. Kiewit Pacific Co. ,
et al ., Case No. 620729, relative to a Stop Notice filed in connection with
Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters
Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and
Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby,
authorized to appear and defend the Districts' interests in this matter, as
necessary.
-4-
04/11/90
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held March 14, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held March 14, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the _
regular meeting held March 14, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held March 14, 1990,
nor the adjourned regular meeting held April 5, 1990, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held March 14, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held March 14, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held March 14, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held March 14, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held March 14, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-5-
04/11/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District Maims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts
so indicated.
3/14/90 3/28190
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 794,025.17 $1,030,159.04
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 841,358.48 5,175,046.30
Joint Working Capital Fund - 158,317.64 107,381.19
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 11,006.37 6,079.75
DISTRICT NO. 1 - -a- 1,706.64
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 10,151.03 1,230,836.7E
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 12,083.60 29,817.61
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,135.39 263,940.34
DISTRICT NO. 6 - -0- 727.20
DI TRI— C - 15,791.30 293,783.31
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 312.69 10,687.08
DISTRICT NO. 1N0. 1" - -0- -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 9,700.10 529,246.16
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 1,827.28 3,564.61
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,273.79 34.88
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 472.53 4,219.60
1,860,45 .3 8,687,TJF47
ALL DISTRICTS Following a discussion of the status
Authorizing staff to issue purchase of the Districts' investigation of
orders to Hauter Ford (Specification alternative clean burn fuels for fleet
No. A-150-1 and to Michael Chevrolet vehicles, it was moved, seconded and
Specification No. A-150-2 duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue purchase orders pursuant
to the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program of the
State of California, and State of California Contract Nos. 1-90-23-10 and
1-90-23-20, as follows:
- Hauter Ford in the amount of $44,930.00 plus tax for the purchase of
Five (5) 4-Door Compact Sedans (Specification No. A-150-1) ; and,
- Michael Chevrolet in the amount of $86,535.00 plus tax, for the
purchase of Nine (9) Pick-Up Trucks, (Specification No. A-150-2)
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchases be subject to confirmation that the
vehicles are compatible for conversion to clean burn alternative fuels.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase of Ferrous
Chloride, Specification No. P-119, That the Boards of Directors hereby
to Imperial West Chemical Company adopt Resolution No. 90-24, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Ferrous Chloride,
Specification No. P-119, to Imperial West Chemical Company, for the
delivered price of $238.58 per dry ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year
period beginning May 13, 1990, with option for a one-year extension
(Estimated annual cost $441,373.00 plus sales tax). Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-6-
04/11/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Nj�rov n Chan e r er o 2 to
Purchase r er No. i 4 ssued to That Change Order No. 2 to Purchase
Continental Graphics re Order No. 40298 issued to Continental
3pecIfica on No. Z.-U44 Graphics for Blueprinting.
Photocopying and Related Services,
Specification No. 5-044, increasing the gross annual amount from $135,000.00
to an amount not to exceed $165,000.00 through July 15, 1990, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Autho riz ng staff o is
s
u
e Change
order No. 1 o Purchase rder That staff be, and is hereby,
o. 39874 issued to Associated authorized to issue Change Order No. 1
Soils Engineering, Inc. to Purchase Order No. 39874 issued to
Associated Soils Engineering, Inc.,
increasing the total amount from $50,000.00 to an amount not to exceed
$100,000.00 through June 14, 1991.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Chan rir 0
an se ci cNo2or That Change Order No. 28 to the plans
Job Nos. Pi-zu and P1- 1 and specifications for Headworks No. 2
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and
Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping
Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing
an addition of $71,636.00 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for 11
items of miscellaneous modifications and additions, be, and is hereby,
approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the ti SeleconCOT
ttee
o ne o late A dendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and
ra essiona Sery ces A reemen is hereby, authorized to solicit a
with Bo e n ineerin or oration proposal and negotiate Addendum No. 2
or es gn of Job No. J-17 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
design and construction services required re Central Laboratory, Job
No. J-17, to provide for escalating costs and additional construction
services.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving ran of Easement to
Southern California Edison company That the Boards of Directors hereby
re Job No. PI- 4-2 adopt Resolution No. 90-25, approving
and authorizing execution of Grant of
Easement to Southern California_ Edison Company for right-of-way required to
operate and maintain Southern California Edison's equipment which will
provide power to the new electrical service center now under construction as
part of Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-34-2. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
-7-
04/11/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
MReceive, file and den claim of
i lbert Hidden That the claim of Gilbert Hulden
dated February 21, 1990, in the amount
of $1,100.00 for damage to his vehicle allegedly caused by hitting a guard
post while backing out of a parking space at Plant No. 2, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the
Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for
appropriate action.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and deny claim of
James E. Wilson and That the claim of James E. Wilson and
a rina Wilson Brown Katrina Wilson Brown dated March 2,
1990, for property damages in the
amount of $418.00 and for medical costs in an undetermined amount, allegedly
caused by an automobile accident involving a District vehicle, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the
Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for
appropriate action.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the
Executive Committee' s meeting on
March 28, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to place all-risk
insurance coverage, including That staff be, and is hereby,
earthquake, flood, fire and other authorized to place all-risk property
perils, effective April 14, 199U insurance coverage, including
earthquake, fire, flood and other
perils, effective April 14, 1990, for an annual premium of $326,150.00, as
recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee, as follows:
Facilities Covered: Treatment plants and pump
stations (excludes sewer
lines and ocean outfalls)
Limits of Coverage: $35,000,000
Deductibles: Earthquake: 10% of replacement cost
Flood:
- Existing Facilities - $ 50,000
- Facilities under
construction - 150,000
Other Perils: - 25,000
-B-
0a/11/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amending lass ca ton and
ompensati on Resolution o. - That the Boards of Directors hereby
as amended, es ab is n n ineerin adopt Resolution No. 90-26, amending
and Scientific n ern Program Classification and Compensation
Resolution No. 79-20, as amended,
establishing Engineering and Scientific Intern Program providing for the
Engineering, Technical Services and Operations 8 Maintenance Departments to
hire engineering and science students as interns during the summer and on a
part-time basis during the school year. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amend in lassification an
com ensa on Resolution No. 7 - That the Boards of Directors hereby
as amen ed re su emen ar adopt Resolution No. 90-27, Amending
staffing addt ions require re Classification and Compensation ..
Finance Department reorganization Resolution No. 79-20, as amended; re
supplementary staffing additions
required in connection with Finance Department reorganization. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amending Classification and
Com ensation Resolution No. 79-20, That the Boards of Directors hereby
as amende establishin a 990 adopt Resolution No. 90-28, Amending
Sumer Work Program Classification and Compensation
Resolution No. 79-20, as amended,
establishing a 1990 Sumner Work Program for painting, grounds maintenance
and pump station maintenance work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving ndment No. I to
Em to ee Commuter ra ram re u re That Amendment No. 1 to Employee
y CAQM0 Rule 1503E Commuter Program, implementing
vanpooling and rideshare incentives to
help meet Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) goals to comply with SCAQMD
Rule 1503, be, and is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby declare that said
rideshare incentives are established at the Boards' discretion and are
subject to change by the Boards at any time.
ALL DISTRICTS
Ac ons re substitution of
electrical subcontractor re
Job No. J- -2
Receive and file correspondence Moved, seconded and duly carried:
dated March 15, 1990 from
Brinderson Corporation That the correspondence dated
March 15, 1990 from Brinderson
Corporation requesting substitution of electrical subcontractor listed .-.
In bid proposal for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant
No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, with no change in contract amount, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed.
-9-
04/11/90
Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported
that Brinderson Corporation,
contractor for construction of Central Power Generation System at Plant
No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, in a letter dated March 15, 1990, advised the
Districts of his intent to substitute the named subcontractor for the
electrical portion of the project (Bergelectric Corporation) because
said subcontractor failed to execute a subcontract.
Notice was served on the subcontractor of the contractors' request and,
to date, the Districts have not received an objection from the
subcontractor. Mr. Woodruff advised, however, that in accordance with
Section 4107 of the California Public Contracts Code, it was
appropriate for the Boards to delegate to the General Manager, or his
designee, the authority to act as hearing officer and make a final
non-appealable decision on the request of Brinderson Corporation to
substitute for said electrical subcontractor, should Bergelectric
Corporation protest the proposed substitution.
Authorizing the General Manager or Moved, seconded and duly carried:
his desi nee to act as hearin
officer and to make final non- That the General Manager, or his
appealable decision on the request designee, be, and is hereby,
of Brinderson Cor orat on re authorized to act as hearing
Substitution of electrical officer and to make a final
subcontractor non-appealable decision on the
request of Brinderson Corporation,
contractor for Job No. J-19-2, to substitute the subcontractor for the
electrical portion of said job, in accordance with Section 4107 of the
California Public Contracts Code.
DISTRICTS 1 2,3,5,6,7,11 6 13
ctions re introduction of proposed
ordinances increasing sewer
connection charges .
Report of General Counsel The General Counsel reported that
the purpose of the ordinances to
be considered for introduction and first reading that evening were to
make adjustments in the annual connection charges for each of the eight
Districts. The increases are based on the Districts' adopted financial
plan and the staff report and recommendations included with the agenda
material. The connection charges are paid by new development and are
used to pay for construction of new capital facilities.
Mr. Woodruff pointed out that the ordinances are identical for each
District and advised that the form of ordinance mailed with the agenda
material inadvertently included the charges currently in effect rather
than the recommended adjusted amounts. He noted that the correct
amounts which will be included in the new ordinances being considered
are $2,280 per residential dwelling unit (rather than $2,270 per
dwelling unit) and $460/1,000 sq. ft. for commercial and industrial
buildings (rather than $450/1,000 sq. ft.)
If acted upon by the Directors, the ordinances will pass to second
reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990.
Directors suggested that upon adoption of these ordinances, the various
cities that collect connection fees -on behalf of the Districts should
be required to acknowledge that they have been advised of the increases
in the charges. Staff noted that letters would be sent to all cities
advising them of the increased charges, and that a public workshop
would be scheduled for city staff members responsible for collection of
the Disricts' connection charges.
-10-
04/11/90
Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated March 21, 1990 re proposed Ordinances, be,
and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 1 '
Actions re proposed Ordinance
o. 115
Makin findin that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
r nance Na. 115 s categorically carried:
exemp per 7EQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the
Board of Directors of County sanitation District No. 1 of Orange '
County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage --
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 114, is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of
the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the
connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for
capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which
are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined
service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive
Master Plan.
First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly
rdinance o. 11 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 114, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 115 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 114, be introduced and passed to second reading and
public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's
administrative office.
-11-
04/11/90
DISTRICT 2
c ens re proposed Ordinance
o. 1
'r►' Mein
findin that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
r inance o. 11 is categorically carried:
exempt per CEQA Guidellnes
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 209, is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of
•• the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the
connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for
capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which
are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined
service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive
Master Plan.
First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly
r nonce d. carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 209, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 211 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 209, be introduced and passed to second reading and
public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's
administrative office.
DISTRICT 3
PEER!
ons re proposed Ordinance
o. 1
Makin f�indii that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
Urd name No. �i� s cam cam carried:
exempt per ULIA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange
-12-
04/11/90
County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 312, is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b) (8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of
the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the
connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for
capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which
are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined
service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive
Master Plan.
First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 313 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 312, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 313 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 312, be introduced and passed to second reading and
public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's
administrative office.
DISTRICT 5
Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. 522
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 522 is categorically carried:
exempt per CEQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange
County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 520 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 521, is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b) (8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of
the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the
connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for
capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which
are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined
service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive
Master Plan.
-13-
04/11/90
First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly
r nance o. carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 520 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 521, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 522 by title only, it was
• moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
•• County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 520 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 521, be introduced and passed to second reading and
public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's
administrative office.
DISTRICT 6
Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. 61b
Ma'Ince No findin that ado t122 of Moved, seconded and duly
rdi . 1 s ca a or cal carried:
exempt per CEQA GuideTines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange
County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 615, is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of
the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the
connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for
capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which
are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined
service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive
Master Plan.
First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly
rdinance o. 1 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 615, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
-14-
04/11/90
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 616 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 615, be introduced and passed to second reading and
public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's
administrative office.
DISTRICT 7
Ac ons re proposed ordinance
No. 7 F
Makin findin that ado tion of Moved, seconded and duly
Minh o. s ca a or ca carried:
exempt per CEQA Guioeiines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 723, is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of
the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the
connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for
capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which
are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined
service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive
Master Plan.
First readin of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly
rdinance o. carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 723, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 724 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 723, be introduced and passed to second reading and
public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's
administrative office.
-15-
04/11/90
DISTRICT 11
Actions re DroDosed Ordinance
NO.
Makin findin that ado ion
of Moved, seconded and duly
r nance o. 1 s cate orical carried:
exempt per E;EQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1111, is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of
the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the
connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for
capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which
are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined
service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive
Master Plan.
First readln of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly
r nance No. III carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 1111, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1112 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 1111, be introduced and passed to second reading and
public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's
administrative office.
DISTRICT 13
Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. 1307
Makin findin that ado tion of Moved, seconded and duly
Ord nance o. 1307 is cate or ca carried:
exemp per A uidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of
-16-
04/11/90
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1306, is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a -
regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of
the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the
connection charges will be used to reimburse the District for
capital projects which have been, and will be, constructed and which
are necessary to maintain service within the existing defined
service areas of the District, as set forth in the comprehensive
Master Plan.
First reading of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly
-Ordinance No. 13 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 1306, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED; That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1307 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 1306, be introduced and passed to second reading and
public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's
administrative office.
DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13
Actions re introduction of proposed
ordinances increasing sanitary
sewer service charges
Report of General Counsel The General Counsel called the
Directors' attention to the staff
report mailed with the agenda material which outlined the basis for
staff's recommendations relative to adjustments to the sanitary sewer
service charges for each District. In accordance with the Districts'
adopted financial plan, these fees are used for the operation,
maintenance and rehabilitation costs, which vary somewhat from District
to District, depending upon each District's financial situation.
Mr. Woodruff pointed out that District No. 2 just recently enacted a
sewer service charge ordinance for the first time. District No. 7 has
not yet adopted sewer service charges. He also advised that Irvine
Ranch Water District pays user fees to District No. 14 in lieu of
District No. 14 adopting sewer service charges.
The General Counsel added that if acted upon by the Districts, the
proposed ordinances providing for adjustments to the sanitary sewer
service charges will pass to second reading and public hearing on
May 9, 1990.
-17-
04/11/90
Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated March 22, 1990 re proposed Ordinances, be,
and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 1
ct ons re proposed Ordinance
NO. 11
Makin find9n that ado tion of Moved, seconded and duly
.. r nan ce No. 11 1s statutor carried:
Exempt per CEDA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange
County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, is
statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the
Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the
protection ofthe environment; and the increased revenues to be
received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for
meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial
reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing defined service
areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master
Plan.
First readin of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly
rdinance N0. 116 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 116 by title only, it was -
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be introduced and passed
to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. ,
at the District's administrative office.
-16-
04/11/90
DISTRICT 3
Actions re proposed Ordinance
o. 314
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 314 1s statutorily carried:
exempt per CEQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange
County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by
the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the
increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service
charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance
expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements
which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within
existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the
comprehensive Master Plan.
First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 314 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 314 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and public
hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's
administrative office.
DISTRICT 5 '
Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. 523
Makin findin that ado tion of Moved, seconded and duly
Or inance N6
. is statutorily carried:
exempt per CEQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds. that adoption of Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange
County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, is
statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the
-19-
04/11/90
Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the
protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be
received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for
\./ meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial
reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing defined service
areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master
Plan.
First readin of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly
r nance 0. 5 3 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the Board of
• Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance In its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 523 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be introduced and passed
to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. ,
at the District's administrative office.
DISTRICT 6
Actions re proposed Ordinance
NO.
Makin findin that ado tion oP Moved, seconded and duly
r nance No. 7 is statu toril carried:
exempt perGuidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange
County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613, is
statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the
Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the
protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be
received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for
meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial
reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing defined service
areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master
Plan.
-20-
04/11/90
First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 617 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, -
California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613, be read
by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 617 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613, be introduced and
passed to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30
p.m. , at the District's administrative office.
DISTRICT 11
Actions re proposed Ordinance
o. 1113
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 1113 is statutoril carried:
exempt per J.LIJA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, is
statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the
Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the
protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be
received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for
meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial
reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing defined service
areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master
Plan.
First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly
Or inance No. Ill carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1113 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
-21-
04/11/90
That Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1108, be introduced and passed
to second reading and public hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m.,
at the District's administrative office.
DISTRICT 13
c ons re proposed ordinance
No.-1368
Makin findin that ado tI2n of Moved, seconded and duly
rdinance Na. 1 s HIE u or carried:
exempt per CE A Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of
the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the
sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational
and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital
requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of
service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as
set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
First readin of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 1 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1308 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and public
hearing on May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's
administrative office.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m. , April 11, 1990.
-22-
04/11/90
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Easement Deed from The
Irvine Company required re That the Board of Directors hereby
Contract No. 5-35-1 adopts Resolution No. 90-32-5,
approving and accepting Easement Deed
from The Irvine Company, at no cost to the District, required in connection
with construction and perpetual right-of-way needed relative to South Coast
Trunk Sewer, Phase I , Contract No. 5-35-1. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications
for Contract No. 5-35-1 That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-33-5,
approving plans and specifications for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I,
Contract No. 5-35-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the
date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and deny claim of
Brian Mathews That the claim of Brian Mathews dated
February 14, 1990, in the amount of
$100,000.00 plus all expenses related to medical care, for damage and
injuries allegedly resulting from a bicycle accident caused by a manhole
cover, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the
Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for
appropriate action.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m. , April 11, 1990.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m. , April 11, 1990.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m. , April 11, 1990.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ad3ournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m. , April 11, 1990. ^
-23-
(REVISED)
04/11/90
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. I to e
Tans and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans
Contract No. - - and specifications for North Branch of
the Rolling Hills Drive Relief
Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer) , Contract No. 2-11-3, authorizing an
addition of $18,045.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons (JV) for four
items of additional work and granting a time extension of 15 calendar days
for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving hange r er o. 5 to the
laps and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 5 to the plans
contract Nos. 2-26-2 and Z-27 and specifications for Portion of
Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between
Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim
Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract
No. 2-27, authorizing an addition of $24,009.00 to the contract with
W. H. Ebert Corp. for six items of additional work and granting a time
extension of two calendar days for completion of said additional work, be,
and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation No 69 - Brohn
Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-29-2,
ordering annexation of 4.76 acres of territory to the District in the
vicnity of Timkin Lane and Coyote Lane in the City of Anaheim (Annexation
No. 69 - Brohn Annexation). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation No. 7 - Wilson
Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-30-2,
ordering annexation of 2.102 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of Country Hill Road and Vista del Sol in the City of Anaheim
(Annexation No. 70 - Wilson Annexation). Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2
ct ons re ative to emergency
repairs equired In connection with
C re Is Avenue Subtrunk Sewer
Contract No. -9R
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that the Cypress Avenue
Subtrunk Sewer, built in 1960, 1s a 15-inch line which services
portions of the cities of Fullerton and Brea. On the west side of the
Orange Freeway, north of Bastanchury Road, the sewer line is an
easement which meanders through an apartment complex adjacent to a
flood control channel. Recently, and without the District's knowledge,
fill had been placed over the sewer line and, in doing so, the weight
of the soil and the earthmoving equipment crushed portions of the line.
He noted that no sewage was spilled; however, the sewer was in danger
of collapse. Staff had, therefore, begun emergency repairs.
-24-
(REVISED)
04/11/90
Staff requested that the Board ratify their action in issuing purchase
orders for the first phase of the emergency repair work, including
necessary engineering support services, T.V. inspection of the line and
construction work in an amount not to exceed $250,000. Mr. Dawes also
recommended that the staff and General Counsel be authorized to
investigate the cause and determine responsibility for the damage.
Ratif in action of staff in Moved, seconded and duly carried:
issuin emer enc urc ase orders
for Repairs to ress Avenue That the Board of Directors hereby
Subtrunk 5ewer, tontraCt No. 2-9R ratifies the action of staff in
issuing emergency purchase orders
in a total amount not to exceed $250,000.00 for the first phase of
necessary Repairs to Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9R;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby,
authorized to investigate to determine responsibility for the damage to
the District's sewer.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
April 18, 1990, at the Orange Public Library, 101 North Center Street, Orange,
California, for a public hearing pursuant to California Health and Safety Code
Section 5473.1 for the purpose of reviewing written reports pertaining to the
provision of sewer service for all properties within County Sanitation District
No. 2, and to consider public comments regarding use of the County of Orange
property tax roll for billing of District sewer service charges for sewer
collection, treatment and disposal services, commencing with the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 1990. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
8:23 p.m. , April 11, 1990.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the
tans and s ecifications re That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
Contrac o. 3-3 R specifications for Rehabilitation of
Manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 3-33R, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and
is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approv ng Addendum No. 2 to the ,
Tans and specifications re That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and
contract No. J-JJR specifications for Rehabilitation of
Manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 3-33R, making miscellaneous clarifications and including
Section 7028.15 of the California Business and Professions Code re
Contractors' licensing, be, and is hereby, approved.
-25-
(REVISED)
04/11/90
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ward n Contracg.
t No. - R o
an con Engineerin Inc. That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-31-3,
receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract
for Rehabilitation of Manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract
No. 3-33R, to Sancon Engineering, Inc. in the total amount of
$2,253,300.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Actions relat ve to emer ent
re airs re sewer reak n ea
Beach Force Man Contract
NO. -1 R
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that the western portion
of District No. 3 drains to a collection system served by the Seal
Beach Pump Station located on the northeast corner of Seal Beach
Boulevard and Westminster Avenue. Water from this system is pumped
easterly through a dual force main to a gravity sewer located half-way
between Bolsa Chica Avenue and Springdale Avenue. Both force mains are
30 inches in diameter and constructed of Techite Pipe, a reinforced
plastic pipe. The first of these mains was installed in 1970 and the
second in 1979.
Mr. Dawes reported further that a sewer break occurred on March 26th in
one of the two parallel forte mains at a location where the pipe exits
a steel casing underneath a Navy railroad on the Seal Beach Naval
Weapons Station property. A small amount of sewage was spilled but was
collected in a sump, gathered and returned to the sewer system. All
water in the force main system was diverted to the second barrel and
flow from the Seal Beach Pump Station was uninterrupted.
Emergency actions were immediately initiated to repair the line. The
repair work was completed by the end of that week, and Westminster
Avenue was fully restored to traffic shortly thereafter.
Staff requested that the Boards ratify their action in issuing purchase
orders for the emergency repairs, including collection of the spilled
sewage, pipe repair, replacement of materials, traffic control , and
repair of the roadbed, in a total amount not to exceed $100,000.
Joint Chairman Catlin complimented the Districts' staff for the
efficient manner in which this incident was handled.
Ratifying action of staff in Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ts—suing emergency purchase orders
for Re airs to No. 1 Seal Beach That the Board of Directors hereby
Force Main, ont%ct No. -13R ratifies the action of staff in
issuing emergency purchase orders
in a total amount not to exceed $100,000.00 for Repairs to No. 1 Seal
Beach Force Main, Contract No. 3-13R.
\./ -26-
(REVISED)
04/11/90
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman ^.
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m. , April 11, 1990.
DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Sewer Service Agreement
with the County of Orange relating That the Boards of Directors hereby
o edication o permanent and adopt Resolution No. 90-34, approving
em orar easemen s for Contract Sewer Service Agreement with the
No. 4-1- Acce tin Grants of County of Orange relating t0 the
Easements an authorizing Quitclaim dedication of permanent and temporary
Deeds to the county of urange easements for the construction and
operation of the Baker Force Mains,
Contract No. 14-1-2; accepting Grants of Easements at no cost to the
Districts; and authorizing execution of Quitclaim Deeds to the County of
Orange, quitclaiming the Districts' South Irvine Trunk to be used to serve
John Wayne Airport, and the MacArthur Trunk, scheduled to be abandoned.
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, a and den c am o
Pacific Bel re ontract o. 14-1-18 That the claim of Pacific Bell dated
March 14, 1990, in an estimated amount
of $10,000.00 for alleged damages to buried cable incurred during
construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview
Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements), Contract No. 14-1-1B, be,
and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the
Districts' General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and
contractor's insurance company for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m., April 11, 1990.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering nnexation No. 130
Char tier Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-35-7,
ordering annexation of 3.079 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity east of the intersection of Orange Park Boulevard and Meads Avenue
in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 130 - Chartier
Annexation). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing n a ono
grocaealngs re eroposeC AnnexaFon That the Board of Directors hereby
NO. - quisling Annexation- adopts Resolution No. 90-36-7,
authorizing initiation of proceedings
to annex 5.71 acres to the District located in the vicinity of Lemon Heights ^
and Lower Lake Drive in unincorporated County territory (proposed Annexation 1,�J
No. 137 - Quisling Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-27-
(REVISED)
04/11/90
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file request for
annexation and authorizing That the petition from James Gable,
initiation of proceedings re Wilfred Taylor and Ethel Lathrum
proposed Annexation No. 138 - Gable requesting annexation of 2.905 acres
Annexation of territory to the District in the
vicinity south of the intersection of
Cowan Heights Drive and Overhill Drive in unincorporated County territory,
be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 90-37-7, authorizing intiation of proceedings to annex said territory to
the District (proposed Annexation No. 138 - Gable Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Actions re Final Report and
Recommendations of Ad Hoc Committee
re Study of Unsewered Properties
Within and Adjacent to Count
Tani ation District No. 7
Verbal Committee report Committee Chairman, Don E. Smith,
reported that after several years
of study, many meetings and extensive written and verbal communications
with property owners in unsewered Orange Park Acres, Lemon Heights and
Cowan Heights within and adjacent to District No. 7, it was the
consensus of the Committee that the majority of the property owners did
not wish to incur the expense of constructing sewer lines in their areas
at this time. The Ad Hoc Committee has therefore recommended that the
District abandon any project for sewering the areas at this time. The
Committee's recommendations also include continued preliminary
engineering studies and planning for a future area-wide sewer
construction program.
Receive, file and approve Final Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Report and Recommendations of
Ad Hoc Committee re Study of That the Final Report and
Unsewered Properties Within and Recommendations of Ad Hoc Committee
Adjacent to County Sanitation re Study of Unsewered Properties
District No. 7 Within and Adjacent to County
Sanitation District No. 7, dated
March 29, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:33 p.m. , April 11, 1990.
Secretary of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-28-
(REVISED)
FUND NO ( ,99 - JY DIST WOPKING-CAPITAL PROCESSING D'ATF 3/07/9A FADE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
. _ .. .. _ . ... ...._.. .... ._.... _ . _ ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF. ORANGE...000NT7 _. _ . . .. ._... ._.
CLAIMS PAID 03/14/911 POSTING DATE 03/14/90
.WARRANT N0. _._.. .—.____._.... VENDOR . .. ._.. _._ ._. AMOUNI .. DESCRIPTION
105423 ADMIRAL ROOFING 35050.00 ROOF REPAIRS
_.1Q5424 AD.Y.ANC,ER_DFF I CE SERVICES.._...... ..... _ .. . .. .. ....S 74O.U3. ... _.... ._. .. OFFICE-EQUIPMENT _. ....._....._...................
105425 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. 354,098.23 CONSTRUCTION P1-25,26,P2-32,34
105426 ALTA SALES, INC. $352.70 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
". _ ..._.. 105427 ._.__..._...ANE8 ICAN..CASL I MG..S_COyM,...__ . ._.. ...___ .._.. .._.. 3223r23._.__ ...___ . ... .. FITTINGS.... __......... .........._._ _....... ...._
10542E AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY S59.00 SUBSCRIPTION
105429 BOSCO INC. $/OR AMERICAN SEALS $5055.01 GASKETS
$1.655.96 _____._..OFFICE..SUPPLIES________.______.
105431 AMERICAN HATER WORKS ASSOC. $377.40 PUBLICATION
105432 ANAHEIM CONVENTION CENTER $5,797.54 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
NOTICES A.ADS_____.._..__._._..___..__...........
105434 APPLE ONE 1940.83 TEMPORARY SERVICES
105435 APPLIED RESEARCH 6 TECHNOLOGY 3891.25 INSTRUMENT
'• _...__..1 OS93fi.______6RA.TEZ.3ERYICES,._INC.aT_.___ ... .._.. _._._3109.97__ ._._____ .__.UNIFORMS _ .__.___.�_....... . ..
105437 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,241.50 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
105438 ASSOCIATED WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $156.19 INSTRUMENT PART
" ._ ...._.... IQ5439._.___.F.ALCON_DIflPOSAL_SEB.VICL____.. _.__. .. _..,._.. .__.._..586,U91.22—__.—..._.__.___....._._.GRIT.REMOVAL_H.G.1v13-88_..__._._......_.._...
305440 BANK OF AMERICA S25.39 BANK CARDS
205441 P.W. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. $6.060.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-2,P2-37
IQ 5442.._—.—..PAXI E"CI CNII F.IS.-PP9DUCT.3__ _.__._.....__ __.. _. .....S2..019.42.._______. _........__.___.LAB..SUPPLIES__._----_______._..._._._
". 105443 BELL L NOVELL CO. $381.00 PRINTER REPAIR
!, ,d 105444 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS $217.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES
S302.57.._------___ _._—.__..RADIATO"KPATR___..___.
105446 BREA PRINTING $1.668.13 PRINTING
105447 BRENNER-FIEDLER L ASSOC.. INC. S80.43 VALVES
' _ _.__. 105445RR UHINEE_ELE07R IC..___. _�. _ _.S50Z.87..___._._____._.__. ._..ELECTRIC_REPAIRS.__.__. ...._._. .. .__..__.._
105450 BUILDING NEWS, INC. $43.84 PUBLICATION
105450 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE 380.01 PUBLICATION
105451 .._. _... . ..._.BURKE.ENGINEEBING_CO,_ ._. $86.37. _ ._.._..... __._. ..ELECTRIC-SUPPLIES,—.. .__.. ._._ .._.. .... ..
105452 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $5,691.00 SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-71
105453 GARY G. STREED $1,685.08 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
.. IC 5454__...__.__.....BUILEB_PAFER_COMPA.NT__.__ ._ _._...... _. _ _..,.t221.53.._ . ...__.. __.. . . _ OFFICE,SUPPLIES...___ __
105455 INC MOBILE SPEEDOMETER S78.06 SPEEDOMETER REPAIR
105456 CPT CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS $29,119.62 CPT COMPUTER HARDWARE
105457 _ CAL-GLASS.FOB RESEARCH, INC.. . . S235.56 . . . . . LAB SUPPLIES_._.. ._._.. ... __.. _. ..
165450 CALTPOL , INC. 311,534.15 REGULATOR PARTS
'j 105459 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $1.078.32 GATE REPAIRS
.. . ... 105469 _._ CALIE, .REGIONAL-WATER_OVALITY._ ._ 12,303.00 ._ FILING.FEES... _.__._... .__.._._.._ ..... __..._,
'.I 105461 CAPITAL WESTWARD $913.14 REGULATORS
105462 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS S154,611.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34,P1-20,P1-36
ID5463 .. ._.. CHARLES. W. CARTER-CO.,. $428.09 HYDRAULIC.REPAIRS.. _
1J5464 CASE POWER 6 EOUIPMENT $489.42 MECHANICAL PARTS
105465 CASTLE CONTROLS, INC. t261.97 VALVE
105466 ... ... A.W...CHESTERTON CO. $4,37P..73 PACKING MATERIALS
305967 CHEVRON U.S.A.• INC. S13,504.23 UNLEADED GASOLINE
105468 C.I.E.S. , CO. , INC. 17.13.00 GEARS/CHAIN
•n
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST VORRINF CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/07/90 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
,I . _. . _.. _. .. COUNTY SAMITA710M DISTRICTS OF ORANGE. COUNTY ._. __. .. ----------
! CLAIMS PAID 03/14/90 POSTING DATE 03/14/90
WARRANT NO. . . . _ .._ _____ ._..VENDOR . . AMOUNT _ _. DESCRIPTION. ._. _._ .. _ .
105469 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $1.435.00 SEAL REPAIRS
° ...__.. 105170_____.CORNELL_ G.M. PARTS../ .DIV.___ ... ._ . . _.._... . ._ ._ S158.A0 ..__. _.__. .._ _ .. . TRUCK_PARTS_._.____.___._._..__. _.
105471 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $5.091.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
105472 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $6,194.37 CHLORINE N.O.10-11-87
' _____105473 .-__.--CONTINENTAL_0.1 SC•-CORP.. _........ ..... _._. ..____.__.. _f249.24..____ ._—. ... __._..__DISCS
105474 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $2.741.44 BLUEPRINTING N.O.7-12-89
105475 COOPERVISION SURGICAL $760.55 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
105476-______...COSTA .M ESA_AUTO_SUEPLY_._ . ... . . .... .. __ ... $12.13_._._.__._ ._._ . ._.__TRUCK. PARTS._.—__�._.__.. .......___._.._. ......
105477 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL $1,850.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
105470 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.850.33 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
'1 .._..105479_.___.CRANE_.Y.E.YOR -CORP..___..........___. ... ..___.___ __ ....._11r566.41L_ . ___.._____ _..._..HARDWARE_.__.. _ — .._._.. ... ._.__
1054B0 CAL WATER S190.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
105483 CURLEY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S290.86 LIGHTING
'._.._.__.105462 .____SIATE_DAAAD_OF_.EQUALIZATION.__..... .......__..._5404.25. ._. .__.._.__ ______e/SARDOUS.WASTESAX__.__. ..._.. ...._.. _.._.
105483 DAILY PILOT $36.00 NOTICES A ADS
105484 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE S5r077.65 TIRES
STAN_OEYERHAN_____ ____._.__._..__.. —__.__..f1 r000.00 ____ —.._.BROCHURE_SERYICES__..____.__..__...__..._..
105486 DICKSONS $198.07 ELECTRIC PART
PI 105487 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $21.25 PRINTING
10540R_ DOB ADO_.ENT ERPR I SES9._14C.__ .__._.____._.___...__SL 827.08__ ._____.—____...PLANE MAINTENANCE_&_REFIARS_._._..._.__.
105489 DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC. $295.38 PUMP PARTS
N
105490 JOSEPH S. DUOOR, P.E. 1780.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
. 305491—_..___DUNKEL_BROS,_KACN MOVING_. ._. __. ...._..__.._..._ ...f2,550.00__. _—___ _ __._. -STORAGE ctuRcef...,t-19____. . _..... . .. .
y 105492 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 111,092.14 PAINT SUPPLIES
N
105493 EMA SERVICES. INC. S16.742.09 CONSULTING SERVICES J-23-2
105494. _. ____—EASTNAN._IMC._.____.___._.._. _._.__. .... _____.S2,Oil.61
105496 ENCHANTER,Sr INC. - $4,240.00 OCEAN MONITORING H.0.6-I4-B9
� 105196 ENCHANTER, INC. 54,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING N.0.6-IO-87
105497.._.. .__._._FACILITIES_SUCPORT_CO-------.. . . _. ._ __..._. ... s1.986.24_._..___ _ . .TOOLSIINSTRUMENT-PARTS-____
105998 JONN 8. FALKE NSiEIN P.E. 53,607.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-6.J-20
105499 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $82.00 AIR FREIGHT
..__ __..105500
105501 FISCHER i PORTER CO. 9232.27 PLUMBING PARTS
L05502 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. S4,991.63 LAB SUPPLIES
...._.. .105503 __.. _GELBER._PUMPS. . INE..._..._._.__. .... .. ... .319046.53_.. _ . PUMP PARTS.. .. ........._...
10550 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA .00 FILM
' I05505 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $1 ,040048.00 SEWAGE CLEANUP PEE
.... .105506 .___. .FOUNTAIN. VALET PAINT _ _.. . .... S119.81 _ .. ._ _ .. PAINT SUPPLIES
105507 FOUNTAIN VALLEY TRANSIT MIX $300.69 BUILDING MATERIALS
105509 FOX ENTERPRISES 21,825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT
105509 .. FOXBORO CO. ./.MAG SYSTEMS . $854.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS _.. .
M' 105510 FRAZEE PAINT i WALLCOVERING $104.23 PAINT
105511 FREDERICK PUMP i ENGINEERING S1,736.75 PUMP PARTS
. _. 105512 ._. ... _.._..CITY OF__FULLERTON .. . $34.45 . . .. WATSR.USEAOE, _.. . _._.. ... _.
105513 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,319.34 BUILDING MATERIALS
• 105514 GEIGER BROS. /VEST $857.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES
i4
FUND NO ■ 39 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING OATE 3/07/99 PAGE
444 REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY_.SANITATION DISTRICTS OF.,ORANGE_000NTY .,__. _ __....,.
� - CLAIMS PAID 03/19/90 POSTING DATE OS/14/90
.I WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT _ DESCRIPTION_...._._. .__ —.._..___._ .
•i 105515 GEM-O-LITE PLASTICS CORP. $357.88 BUILDING MATERIALS
IQ5516 GENERAL_TELEPHONE._CO. _ _ _. _ ,. _ S1 pA92.?I TELEPHONE SERVICES_____��__ ._.__._.._
'I 155517 TOM GERLINGER S359.76 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE
^� 105518 GIERLICH-MITCHELL. INC. S15.696.97 MECHANICAL PARTS
.. .... . ...... . 117,7.57.59 ..... .. _._._... .. .SURVEYING_SFRVICES,RES._88-.72_.—
•I_ ._--_ 305519.._._..__...._DOM 0R_EEK_.E._ASS OC IA7 E.S____, ,,,.. . _.__...
.......... .
^I 105521 HACH COMP INC. $ $142.54 MEDICAL EVALUATION
105522 HARK COMPANY 5192.59 LAB SUPPLIES
105522 _ HAIt R1 N6TON INDUSTRIALPLASTICS _ ._.S2.713 .03___.,.
105523 HAUTE NIflN. INC.. f3.967.95 MECHANICAL PARTS
105524 MARTE-HANKS COMMUNICATIONS INC $3,965.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
105525 HEKIMIAN S ASSOC.r_INC__.__—__.._.___.__.______._.
105526 E.G. HE ILER•S SON. INC. $487.59 TOOLS
105527 HEWLETT-PACKARD $1,590.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
_ . __...105528MYLES S. HIGASHIMURA___.. ..._. . $1.6.58 . _NILEACe E%PHNSE___._ .
105530 LINRA HIRE NES $181.79 LIABILITY SETTLEMENT
305550 HOER B76ER C.Y.S. CALIF. s INC. E181.79 COMPRESSOR PARTS
_105531. HOUSE OF_BATTERIES.__.— _._Sj 7¢.BS _._ _ T3.EAERTE9-__—____,_ _
305552 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $2.438.91 SAFETY SUPPLIES
bl 105533 HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO $29.859.33 TEST EQUIPMENT
'.__._,__105534 CITY of HUNT INGTON_BEACIL___________ _____i1Z..1¢_ __WATER USEACE
105535 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP S122.31 RUBBER STAMPS
H 205536 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL S56.617.33 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-08-89
105537 INDUSTRIAL THREADED
^ ? 1G553S INGRAM PAPER $1,163.07 PAPER
w 1D5539 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT S19.47 WATER USEAGE
GREAT WESTERN SANITARYSUPP. S418,66 _JANITORIAL SUPPLIES_
105541 JENS6N 1N5TRUMENTS CO. S948.72 INSTRUMENT
105542 JENSEN TOOLS E ALLOYS S324.70 TOOLS
105543JOYCE OFFICE PRODUCTS _ __ .. 3_}24
205544 KALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $1,859.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES
105545 KAMAN BEARINGS A SUPPLY $10,859.23 FITTINGS/PULLEYS
__ _..105546_._..... -__ KANER COMPANT $953.57.___...._._..______-_____T.OULS(MRBNARE__._-_..__-_._—_—____..__._
105547 KING BEARING. INC. $834.24 MACHINE SUPPLIES
105548 LINDBERG $70.01 ELECTRIC PART
_ _105549._____ __,, .LINCOLN CENTER_MDBJLE HOME__. . . .$5.3¢5.26 REPUND_USERPEE.OVERP.AYMENT______,..
105550 N.P. LI NOSiRON. INC. S10.640.05 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.10-14-87
105551 LOS ANGELES TIMES $22.44 NOTICES 6 ADS
.105552____., NBC_APPLIED_ENVIRONMENTAL _. _ . ._ ,_ .. .. _ S29528.10 _ OCEAN.MONITDRING.____ . ..____-__. _........__.
109953 ROT B10L06IC COMPANY a57H.61 LAB SUPPLIES
105554 MPS $389.15 PNOTOGRAHIC SERVICES
... __ _. 105555__ HACONCO__ $315.03_ SERVICE AGREEMENT,_.._
105556 WAIN FRApE SERVI LFS 31.512.00 COMPUTER REPAIRS
105557 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $250.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTMENT SERVICES DIST 2
105558 _____..__ _MARVAC. ELECTRONICS _ _ S19.27_ _ _ INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
105559 MATT - GM LOR• INC. $I .922.95 ELECTRIC PARTS
105560 MIKE MCCARTHY $280.94 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/07/90 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
__. . _ _.. .._, ____. _........, ... ._. COUNTY. SANITATION DISTRICTS, OF. ORANGE COUNTT . . . .. _ ... _. . .___.._._. ...__ .___._.._.._.._.
CLAIMS PAID 03/I4/90 POSTING DATE 03/14/94
' _ _..WARRANT..NO.. VENDOR. __...___ . .. ._ ._. AMOUNT._. _...... . ___.__ . . .. _.._ ._ DESCRIPTION___.._. . .. --------
105561 MCKENNA THOR. S EQUIP. $545.61 PUMP PARTS
_..___.._.._HEAD Sl.E.8KAGING
10556] MEAD PACKAGING 1526.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
105564 MERCK S CO., INC. $35.00 PUBLICATION
OFFICE..MACHINE
105566 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. $59.51 PIPE SUPPLIES
105567 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $86.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
_._._ 105566.— ..32,.115.
105569 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $670.41 TRANSDUCER
' 205570 MORGAN CRANE CO.r INC S182.00 HYDRAULIC REPAIRS
. .__3.055I1_ .tlOS 17Lf➢LNORY____.—_____.._ ____ _. 32,806.53_._ _._.___. .......
105572 MORTON SALT AND/OR $440.45 SALT
105573 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. $641.72 MECHANICAL PARTS
.___1055I5 NALI.ON.AL VISUAL $63.8.5. —.SIGO SUPPLIES
105576 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS 726.75 SIGN SUPPLIES
"^ 1OS576 MEAL SUPPLY CO. $726.75 oIL
"_..—_J➢55Z2_— NEYJ1.EEtlE.S,J NL..____ _ ---------$265.5fl____._._.___�—.__OPFICe_SUPPLIES—...________.__.___...
?' 105578 SY NIELSON SERVICE , INC. $132.50 LAB SERVICES
.' Ly 205579 NORTH SUPPLY $235.56 COMPUTER PARTS
•'_�____195581 .OLE LEE, INC_YI3J.RN. SAYETID TRUCK
•• ti IC4581 OLE LEG INC. $92,332.13 FLATBED TRUCK M.0.6-14-89
•_ H 109582 DR SYSTEMS CO. S191,320.30 CHLORINE H.0.2-14-90
• H 305583_._ 889N0E�EAAf.NOzINC�—_—_—.__.—_.__._._A441.21__—_..—______.. Y-BELTS _
'." 2. 105584 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. S139.50 TRUCK PARTS
105585 ORANGE VALVE S FITTING CO. S449.50 FITTINGS
._.__105587_. COUNTY ..OFORAE—____—_..____.._____. _..._._._$4,850.04________—__._—DPECIALOCESSBES_SE__.__.._.___.._____. .. ..
_ 305507 COUNTY OF ORANGE � 39r 850.00 DATA PROCESSING BERVICES
105588 COUNTY OF ORANGE $450.00 MAPPING
.__. A10.d2T•53._.____._____....__. ._._REIMSVRSE_WORKER'S.COMP.INSURANCE.__..._.
105590 PACIFIC DATA CON SYSTEMS $210.96 ELECTRIC PARTS
105591 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $1,207.46 SAFETY SUPPLIES
105599 ._...._P AC I FIC Of LL_____ ___... .... ._._..___..___.._ _ __._.___.328.f 29., .._.__.. ....__._____TELEPHONE_SERVICES___...___._
105593 PACIFICA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL $4,513.48 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
105594 PAUL-MUNROE HYDRAULICS S1r156.65 PUMP
_,105595 __. P1HA_¢R O_Sj3]EM$r. INC _ ... _._ .. .. . . .$ORr537.15„ SLUDGE. REMOVAL_M.0 $
105596 POLYPURE, INC. S35,942.08 POLYMERS M.0.1-10-90 8 9-89
105597 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS $1,790 56 OFFICE MACHINE
1D559R ......._._. .HAROLD_PRIMROSE __ _..... ... ...___ S72.00 ... _ .. .._.. ICE__..
•M 105599 PROFESSIONAL TREE CARE $2,650.00 TREE TRIMMING
++� 305600 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. S4,876.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION H.0.8-30-88
+°I 105601 . . _ _ . P U L B AF E E D E 0. ... . _ . . $515.76 _ PUMP PART. ..
105602 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. SIU,958.63 PUMP PARTS
l ,l 105603 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $911.40 TRASH REMOVAL
105609_ RFCY,C,_..IN9,__._,. _ ., ,. _ $52,440.00 _ SLUDGE REMOVAL, M•05I 1-88.___. ....,. _ ..
I 105605 RED WING SHOES $101.11 SAFETY SHOES
d IC5606 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $1,012.54 ELECTRIC MOTOR
FUND NO l 99 JT GIST WOPAING .CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/07/91) PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
...,._.._ . ... __........._._.._..._..._______ .._ ._... . ._COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .._ _._ .....
CLAIMS PAID 43114190 POSTING DATE 03/19/9U
WARRANT. NO._. ... . . . ...._..__.__.. .. VENDOR .. .. . _... . _. .. .,. AMOUNT. . . _ DESCRIPTION . _.. ....
105607 THE REGISTER 990.00 SUBSCRIPTION
.__...._10A60B .........._.......BEM EQY._TEMP_.__.___ ._.._._.._. .. ._ _ ... .......... _.._. f557.70... ... ..__. ... _...__ TEMPORARY.SERVICES.._....___..___.____.._ ....
105609 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. S965.57 HARDWARE
1D5618 REMOLD POWER TRANSMISSION S149.24 MECHANICAL PARTS
_...... .105611 ._..............__.._J•_B A..AOBER TS. CORP..__.._._. ...._. $471081.95 ....... .. _. . .._. CONSTRUCTION...U-7-4,J-20 _._._._ . ........
105612 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC f345.31 LAB SUPPLIES
105613 RYAN-XERCO $16.38 FREIGHT
(._ .... .. 105619 5KE_VE S.T. ._.._.. ._. ,.f 238.98...____ .. ...._. _._...._. LAB SUPPLIES_..._ .._ ...._----_..___.__...
105615 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. S66.40 PARTS CLEANER
105616 SANTA FE BAG CO. $197.90 BUILDING MATERIALS
___....,.IOSb1Z $0 LE xQF_A.PPL.I CAT.A.0NS...INT.!L.__. .. . .. 00EAN.MONITORING..M.O.6e14=84___._,____._ ..
105618 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,979.29 OFFICE MACHINE/FURNITURE
105619 SEARS. ROEBUCK t CO. $926.12 TOOLS
TOOLS _-_._...._. _....__..._._....._.__. _.___
105621 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $2.650.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS
105622 SLIDE MAKERS WEST $81.66 PRESENTATION AIDS
"_.. 305623.___..—_ SLIDE.MASTER_._.__.___ __.___._..._..._..__._......_...._._;94..56_....._._ ......-.-_...____. ._PRESENTATION.AIDS...__._.___._,__..__._.. __......
105624 SMITH-EMERY CO. SI.730.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89
" t» 105625 SMITH PIPE B SUPPLY. INC $262.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
.• _105624____—SNAP_-oy_IW4LS_£QNP, _._..... _......__ .. $233.92.__.. ------- _.._____._ . .TOOLS_ ._ __...._... _ _.__.._..._ .._..._.._.
105627 SOFT WAREHOUSE $146.63 COMPUTER PARTS
105628 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY f15.549.9U APPLICATION FEES
'r-a._.._.105629_._.____.S.OUIN_CAA.S LSE A__EODDS_TNC•.._.._____ .__�. ._.. .. ..........f 4.59.35...__—.._...___.__.. REF.UND..USER_FEE.OVERPAYMENT._.__ ...__.._.._.
^ 105630 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $5,654.92 POWER
105631 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 35.730.77 DIESEL FUEL
_ .$2,271.63 ... WELDING-SUPPLIES.._...
._..__._._...—.____._...._._.__.
105633 SPECTRUM CONSULTANS t SYSTEMS Y $1,922.38 CONSULTING SERVICES - FLEET MNGMHT SYS.
105634 STAR TOOL t SUPPLY CO. $1,478.33 TOOLS
$2,969.97 _. ...__—.__._.____ _STEEL. . ..........._.__, ..___.__._.._ ....._.. ._..__
105636 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE t MAINT. $405.00 CONTRACT LANDSCAPING M.0.8-9-89
105637 SUPELCO. INC. $861.79 LAB SUPPLIES
'... . . . . .105638 _ __...._. .SUPEB_CIIEM. CORD. __ _ _ _... _.._...._. . _ .. _. f913.75.._ _ _.__ ..._- CHEMICALS_..._._._.._ .
105639 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $6,545.33 TOOLS/HARDWARE
.I 105640 7.A.S.A. OF ARIZONA $875.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
105641 ._ TAYL00-PUNN . ..._..._ .---- _ .. .. .. .. $442.37 .. . . ELECTRIC CART PARTS _..
?I 105692 TXER NE TRTCS-HAVER IC CORP. 5187.81 INSTRUMENT
105643 THOMPSON LACQUER CO. S1.384.72 PAINT
_.. 10564A .._____3T_EOUIPMENT_ COMPANY.. _ _._ _ _ i89.74 ..._ _ .. TOOLS__ _..
"1 105645 TRURO t ASSOC. 524.00 GROUNDING SURVEY
105646 TILLINGHAST $130.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - INSURANCE
105697. _.. _ . TINKER„ CONTROL
_ _ ., _. 5296.76 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
105645 TRAFFIC SERVICE. INC. $131.60 ROAD SIGN RENTAL
r
105649 TRAVEL TRAVEL $882.50 TRAVEL SERVICES
_105650 _,__... ._.TRUCN_t_AUTO SUPPL,YL .LNC. 11,626.82 TRUCK,PARTS ._. . ..
105651 J.C. TUCKER t SON, INC. $464.16 INSTRUMENT
105652 UNOCAL 1174.83 GASOLINE
,i
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORXING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/07198 PACE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
--COUNTY. SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE..COUNTY _._ . ....__ ... ... . . ..
CLAIMS PAID 03/14/90 POSTING DATE 03/14/90
.._ WARR A NT-g0.__. .. _._.__. ._.VENDOR . . ..._ AMOUNT .. .. _..._ .... _ _. DESCRIPTION _....._ ._._ .._..
1' 105653 THE UNISOURCE CORP. $249.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES
.. 105654 . . _ ..._._.UNITED.. CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY _.. .. S1,818.09 _ .. . . . .... REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT--------
165655 UNITED ELECTRIC SUPPLY S1.317.05 ELECTRIC FITTINGS
105656 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $56.56 PARCEL SERVICES
" _ ._. 105657 ... -ELEVATOR -COMPANY--. . _..._. .. .. .. _..._ _5326.15.. __.... .. _.. ... . _-MAINTENANCES CONTRACT ------- --_-- -
105658 US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE S55.00 SUBSCRIPTION
n
105659 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.826.10 LAB SUPPLIES
105660._ ._._.._._...VALLEY_CIT.I.ES_.SUPPLY_.C.O------.__..___.. _ . ._ ..... . ._ .$4.527.51._. . . . _. . ... _ . .-PIPE 6 FITTINGS---_._....... ...____..____.. -- ...
105661 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY f806.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES
105662 VILLAGE NURSERIES $82.63 GROUNDCOVER
_._ 105663-
_._ODOR-.CONTROL-CONSULTANT-..__.. .-.
105664 CARL WARREN S CO. $178.22 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADJUSTER
108665 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $30.00 PERMIT FEE
.__IO5666___.IME_WASER_HAN_._...� __...___._______._. .. _f135..97._—.—___ ____REFUND-USER FEE..OVERPAYMENT----.--- ---
105667 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE $82.80 GUARD SERVICES
105668 WESTERN CANNERS. INC. $245.28. REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
" _. .-._.105669..____ ___....YES IERN_.HIGHWAY_.RROOUCTS._.IN[..._...____.__ .. ....... ....__._f260.0A. --- ._.._____..-_.SAFETY.SIGN-..-_..... ......._..-___—_ _.__..
105670 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY S37.614.56 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89
X 105671 WORDPERFECT CORP. S568.43 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
105672_______WORKERS I_C ONE ENSATION._CO._._______ .__.........
pr 105673 XEROX CORP. $6,216.34 COPIER LEASES
y 105674 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES $1,549.97 INSTRUMENT PART
_ 105675 .E.VERETL11 a...Y.OR N_.CA. ..._._.___.._SS12.O L .. ENGINE. PART_
105676 YOflX INTERNATIONAL S40 ELECTRIC PARTS
-
TOTAL CLAIMS P I
IMS PAID 03/19/90 $1,8
60.955.37
-es e
_�..... SUMURY. _ .. .__._ . .._._ __ ._. _ .. . .AMOUNT._.. . -. .__.
/2 OPER FUND = 5.159.27
02CAP FAG FUND- .._._. __ _....__,__._._. ... _ .,.. . __ _ . .. 4,99176
13 OPER FUND 12,017.08
,i 03 CAP FAC FUND 66.52
05 OPER FUND _ _._._ .__.____ _ .. .... . ._ ____. ___ .. ... 1,442,11 _._ .. ._._.... _ ._.... . . _ _. .__..__._.._._. ...__.
u 25 CAP FAC FUND 1,693.28
07 OPER FUND 12,114.43
07 CAP PAC FUND- .__._. ___. ._ __ .._.._. _. . .. .. 3,676,87 ..
OIL OPER FUND 204.16
01l CAP FAC FUND 108.53
014 OPEN FUND _ _. .__ ._.. _. 19.47
014 CAP FAC FUND 9.680.63
0566 OPEN FUND 1,816.88
H'i-- 9566 CAP FAC-FUND-.._ . _...__._ .__ ._. . ... ..._.... .... . .. .. I0:40
1667 OPER FUND 2,273.79
"-� 07614 OPER FUND 472.53
JT DIST OPER FUND - - 794,025,17
CORD 841.358.48
SELF FUNDI KER'S COMP INSURANCE FUND„ 11,006.37
-JT DIST Wo - . , CAPITAL FUND - 158.317.64 -
f1,860,455.37
FUND NO ( 9 JT DIST WORKING COITAL PROCESSING•DATE 3/22/90 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITA71ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
i1 CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/28/90
WARRANT NO. - VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
i'
105694 A S G INDUSTRIES S27.593.13 DEWATERING EQUIPMENT
...,. 105695 AAA-TRUCK-BODY....... ... ..... ...... . ._ . -_. .... .. 61.932.98. -_ TRUCK PARTS
105696 AT 0 T $306.57 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE
395697 ACCESSORIE AIR COMPRESSOR SYS. $1,229.45 COMPRESSOR PARTS
105698 ---- ...ADYANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC - - -- f747.B54.60 - CONSTRUCTION J-15 - -
'I 105699 AIR PRODUCTS L CHEMICAL INC. $15.296.00 OXYGEN GENERATION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
105700 AIRGUARO INDUSTRIES. INC $325.73 FILTERS
109701 LEASING-ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE---- - ----- $1,293.32 - - - ------ AUTOMOBILE LEASING -
105702 ALPHAGA2 S699.25 GASES
n
105703 ALTA SALES, INC. 1166.55 GAUGE
105704 _._...___. AMER ICAN._FLEET PARTS.----.__---....---.-- ....__...._..... .. . .... . . $22.25 . .... .... . _. . .. _ .. TRUCK PARTS -
" 105705 ROSCO INC. 1/OR AMERICAN SEALS $4,499.30 CASKETS
l" 105706 AMERITECH S97.75 COPIER LEASES
ip 105707 - -------- ANAHEIM SEWER-CONSTRUCTION--- ------... ..__.._-.._...._.:..... 13.026.00 -- - - - MANHOLE REPAIRS DIET 11 - -
105708 A-PLUS SYSTEMS f2.138.86 NOTICES 6 ADS
1P5709 APPLE ONE S895.36 TEMPORARY SERVICES '
1 05 710--------ARATEX-SERVICES.- INC.---------- --- 64.981.73--- --- UNIFORM RENTALS--_._.._.._.
105711 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD.. INC $147.56 BUILDING MATERIALS
•� 105712 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $5,020.00 SOIL TESTING H.O.6-14-89
-- 105713- -ATOMIC-SPECTROSGOPT --=----- f40.00---------SUBSCRIPTION-------- - - - ---- -
105714 AUTODESK. INC. $1.920.50 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
m 105715 AWAROSSTROPHTES S52.54 SERVICE AWARDS
105716 --- -_.._._....FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE------- ---------- --- - $48,724.60 --- - - -------- GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-86 - - -
1p 105717 BANK OF AMERICA-C.A.S.C. S8.084.06 C.O.P. ADMINISTRATIVE PEE
1 105718 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $294.20 REGULATION PUBLICATIONS
105719 --.—._._,.._P..W.-BAROT7I-AND-ASSOC.-----.------- -- -14.740.00 --------••-- CONSTRUCTION SERVICESPI-34-16202-37.J-24
1D5720 8. BATEMAN . $565.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION'
105721 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2,470.91 LAB SUPPLIES
"- .. 10%722 --_...___..BISHOPIS-SANITARP-MAINT.-SUPP.-.------- S302.81- --- - ---- -_.....JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
195723 HOWARD BLEVINS S200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
105724 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $346.00 RADIATOR REPAIR
305725_ -.B ON M-RUES-.-......_._-.__—....._.... _.--__-___ .___5262.19 PARTS .... ...
105726 BROWN 1 CALDWELL $4,910.75 LAB SERVICES H.D.3-8-89
105T27 BROWN B CALDWELL CONSULTING f1.546.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 89-45
105728..__.._._.___
- �STEY E-RUB ALO CONSTRUCTION-CO.-- 3715.073.90--- - CONSTRUCTION-14-1-18 -
105729 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $2,393.50 MECHANICAL PARTS
105730 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $2,616.09 SURVEYING RES 88-71
105731 -_.__.._._, GARY-G. STREED - -- - _.. .._ . _.. __ .._.. .. 9406.71 - - - --. PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
105732 BYPRODUCTS MANAGEMENT. INC. $33,653.24 FERROUS CHLORIDE M.0.4-12-89
105733 CPT CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS $297.19 COMPRESSOR PARTS
105734 IS COMPANY._. . 1447.10 MECHANICAL PARTS
105735 1990 CWPCA CONFERENCE f1029.OD CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
105736 CAL-CHEM SALES $48.70 HARDWARE
A05737-._._.. .....CAL-GLASS-FOR,RESEARCH. INC. - - S1s169.74 LAB SUPPLIES -
105738 CALS CAMERA $153.07 VIDEO CASSETES
105739 CARLETON ENGINEERS $6,765.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES - AQMD MATTERS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/22/90 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
_..._ . ...._ . .., _ ... ...... _.._..-.... ... .. _ ..COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
r
CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/28/90
' WARRANT NO. - - VENDOR ------ - - - - - - AMOUNT - DESCRIPTION
105740 CARMENITA FORD TRUCK SALES, IN S17.92 TRUCK PARTS
` 105741-------- JOHN--CAROLLO ENGINEERS - - - ---- - -- - $159,050.87 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36;P2-42;P1-34
105742 CHALLENGE BEARING S IND. SPLY $254.30 BEARINGS
105743 A.Y. CHESTERTON CO. $1,932.70 PACKING MATERIALS
1 _.._._..105744 -.-__.___,.--._._CHEVRON-U.S.A.,-INC,.—_.--._ ._...- ____.._ _.. ._._ . ._.. .S1,054.19 . ....... .. ...__ ..... OIL a 'GREASE . ... ._ ._ .. .
105745 CHROME CRANKSHAFT, INC. $390.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
105746 CLA-VAL COMPANY 950.00 VALVE
105 747---------CLOSSON -6--CLOSSON --------------------_-- - $1,946.50 ---- - - LANDSCAPE DESIGN - -'
105748 COLICH AND SONS $191.544.30 CONSTRUCTION 2-I1-3
105749 COMPUSERVE $10.00 SERVICE BUREAU
CONN EL L-G.M.--P ART9-/- B1V._____..__.--__....__._-.......$623.87_.__ ._--.—___.... ... -TRUCK PARTS. . .
105751 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. S5,210.36 ELECTRIC PARTS
105752 CONTAINER12ED CHEMICAL DISPOSA $90.00 DRUM
105 753 --------^CONTINENTAL--GRAPHICS-- --- - - - S3,832.89--------------- BLUEPRINTING'M:0:7-12=89
105754 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 3317.68 TRUCK PARTS
105755 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S354.98 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
105756-----CREATIVE-SOREEN-ARTG--------_- -: -- f3,691.28--_------------SAFETY-SUPPLIE9-"-"' --'-- '
105757 CAL WATER S200.50 RENTAL EQUIPMENT105758 "
H---195759-----DANASTATEGORPORATIONNIA f313.92 --------_TRUCRNOTARYPART$------
' m 105760 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $229.29 TIRES
y 105761 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS 9171.02 BOXES
105762-- DEPENOA8LE-HIGHWAY-EXPRESS ----------f32.e 1----- _- --FREIGHT----------_..___...-.__ . .. ..
105763 DE20RIK AND/OR CS CO. $1,011.76 VALVE '
ro 105764 DICKSONS 1156.40 ELECTRIC PARTS
1 0 5 765-----.--DIFILIPPO-ASSOCIATES-- ------------$4,914.60 ---------------- O➢FICE SUPPLIES --_.-_._. __...._._. .
105766 DORADO ENTERPRISES* INC. $15,367.26 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
205767 GUNNEL BROS. MACH MOVING S2,800.00 EQUIPMENT MOVING
- 105768---------DUNN-EDWAROS-CORP.-- ------ --- _...-.._.. ._._593.00----_------------ PAINT SUPPLIES- - "-
31 105769 DYYER INSTRUMENT, INC. $299.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS
105770 D•VALS SALES $28.69 PU14P PARTS
105771 E.I.L.-INSTRUMENTS, -INC.--- ----- - $98.12 - ---- ---- _- ------ ELECTRIC PART
105772 ENSECO-CRL 62,350.00 OCEAN SAMPLING
105773 EASTMAN, INC. $1,978.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES
'^ 105779 - _... . .. V. -H..EBERT-CORP. --- ------- - -- - ----_... - 51.063,627.20 - - - -- - - CONSTRUCTION 2-26-2
10ST75 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY $74.38 PRESENTATION AID
105776 EDWARD L. ELLIOT, JR. $1.820.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
" _-.405777-..._.__ .__EMERY-WORLDWIDE...... ._._._.___.__.. . .__..-___..._. SI,268.20 - _ _ . ..- . . AIR FREIGHT
105778 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO. S2.594.60 MECHANICAL PARTS
105779 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. $684.46 TOOLS/MARDWARE
105780 - MARSHALL .FAIRRES - S350.00 DEFERRED COHP DISTRIBUTION
105781 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3,675.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES .]-7-4.J-20
105762 FAPR SALES 6 SERVICE $10.448.05 FILTER
105783 _.. _ ... ...FEDERAL.-EMPRESS CORP. -.-..... . .. _. S64.00 - AIR FREIGHT -
105784 FERRELLGAS $22.95 PROPANE
105785 ` FICO•S APPLIANCE SERVICE $49.90 VACUUM REPAIR \
FUND NO ( 19 - JT O13T YOR MI NG CAPITAL PROCESSING DAME 3/22/90 PAGE 1�
REPORT NUMBER AP43
- - --- - - - - --- - - --- --- - - --- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - - - -
CLAIMS PAID 03/26/90 POSTING DATE 03/2R/90
WARRANT NO. - -- VENDOR-- - __ - - -- -- AMOUNT - - DESCRIPTION
105786 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $294.48
c CHLORINATION PARTS
� 105787- -----FISG HER-f-FOR TER CO. f2.975.37 INSTRUMeNT REPAIR -
105788 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 3327.25 LAB SUPPLIES
105789 FLAT & VERTICAL CONCRETE 9368.00 CONCRETE CUTTING
105790 -_-- -- FLEETYASH-SYSTEMS. INC. ---- --- - - - - - -- $738.29 -- - - - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
105791 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $9.25 FILM
105792 THE FOXBORO CO. f1.197.03 INSTRUMENT PART/ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
-1 0 5 7 9 3--------- A.F.-FREY-------------^-- 3105.r00-- _._..__. ____ ....... DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION -
105794 DEC AUTOMATION PROJECTS. INC. 536.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
105795 GFS CHEMICALS $46.28 LAB SUPPLIES
- -- 105196.— -----GTE-GA6IFORNIA.-INC.--- --f1.900.00 -- ------_ TEMP EASEMENT M.0.2-10-88 -"
105797 G4RRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,334.50 CHEMICALS
- 105798 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 36.015.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES
--_-105799 -------GIERLICH-MITCHELL.-ING. ------- ----911,570.19------ --------—-MECHANICAL PARTS----- - - -
105800 GOODALL $5.159.50 EXPANSION JOINT
105801 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION S2r600.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
- - 105802--.----DON-GREEK-&-.ASSOCIATES--- ----------f6.99B.98=----------- ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 88-72-'- -
105803 HACH COMPANY $607.65 LAB SUPPLIES
105804 HARDWOOD CENTER $274.75 LUMBER
" - -105805 --- -FRED-A.-HARPER --- ----- ------- ilt 995.00 -------_.___._.. __DEFERRED-COMP DISTRIBUTION
m
105806 HATCH & HIRE. INC. 5690.63 MECHANICAL PARTS
305807 S. A. NEA LY CO. f89r753.23 CONSTRUCTION PI-35-1
" y 195809--- ----HOERBI GEL-G.V.B.-OA trFF.--.-ING.----- ----------- $268.60------------------COMPRESSOR-PARTS---- - -
,� 105809 DONALD D. HONOMICHL 330D.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
105810 HORIZON HIGH-REACH $1,104.02 TRUCK PARTS
'� - - 105811 ------HOUSE-OF-BATTERIES— -----_._._.._._-..- $1.229.91---------- -BATTERIES- ---------- - -- -
105812 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $2.395.47 SAFETY SUPPLIES
105813 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $13.884.78 WATER USEAGE
�� - - - 305814 .----_HUNTINGTON-SUPPLY--- ----- -------_-- - $131.67 - -_._____ _- _- HARDWARE
105815 IBM CORP/PC BOOKS & SPECIAL PR $121.19 BOOK
105816 ICC INSTRUMENT $75.98 . METER REPAIR
_....105817- —ENERGY-SERVICES-GROUP------------- - --6304.06 ---- -- ---- ENGINE PARTS ---- '- -- -- - - -
105818 IMPER74L WEST CHEMICAL $94.661.55 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-08-89
105819 INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIF. $30,208.79 RETENTION RELEASE - COASTLINE COMET. 5-27
105820 - --- . - -INDU57RIAL THREADED PRODUCTS- - - - -- --- - $2.148.75 CONNECTORS
195821 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. f771.80 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
105822 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY f497.04 ELECTRIC PARTS
- 305823 -- -- - JOYCE- OFFICE-PRODUCT& - - -- - 5708.31- OFFICE SUPPLIES "-
105824 KALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $621.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES
105829 RAMAN BEARINGS & SUPPLY 3854.10 FITTINGS
305826 KANER COMPANY - - - - $1,416.64 TOOLS
105P27 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 63.162.5U WORKERS COMP ADMINISTRATION FEE
105828 KENOKO. INC. $227.421.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-34
--- 305829 -- . _.._..-,KEN•S-OIL♦- INC. - - - - - - - - - $2.146.25 - WASTE OIL REMOVAL -- -
105830 KIEYIT PACIFIC CO. $78,057.80 CONSTRUCTION PI-31
105831 KING BEARING. INC. $563.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/22/90 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
,� ---- - - ---- -- -- COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -
CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/28/90
WARRANT NO. - --- - ------- VENDOR - ---- -- - AMOUNT - DESCRIPTION
105832 KNAPPI MARSH, JONES B DORAN $675.00 LEGAL SERVICES - IN ENFORCEMENT
-- -- 105833""'-- - -"KNOX -INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES------ -' -' -- " -- - S685.89 - NEATER '-"- -'
305834 MARTIN KORDICKI SR S4.012.40 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES M.0.8-10-88
305835 H.V. LAWMASTER S CO., INC. S5.694.2C SOIL TESTING M.0.6-/4-89
105836- HOWARD LENORE-- ---- ---- - -- - - - $949,27 MEETING EXPENSE
305837 LE ROY CRANDALL 1 ASSOC. S4.830.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES
1058,,18 LEVCO ELECTRIC CO. $115.80 TRUCK REPAIRS
"- --105839 -...__.---.LIGMTHOUSE.INC r-._..___.__._._... __ __..__._-_ _-. _ . ..__A123.58. ___ .. __. - MECHANICAL PARTS ...
105840 NBS/LOWRY $20,455.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.I1-08-89
105841 A.J. LYNCH CO. $84.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
--- -- 10 584 2-------M6C--APPLIED-ENVIRONMENTAL-_....._. .___.... _. _.._..-_$2,610.00 -"-- --_'---- -OCEAN MONITORING
305843 MOT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $293.52 TAB SUPPLIES
105844 MPS 310.63 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
- lOSB4S"-'-'----MAB-SY9 iEN3 5219s13- INSTRUMENT PART
., 105846 MALCOLM PIRNIE 4 INC• $28.013:54 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.7-12-89
305R47 MARSHALL MAINT. PRODUCTIONS 580 00 TRAINING VIDEO RENTALS
-105848 --- -------NARVAC -ELECTRONICS'------ --- ___. ..... . _. _$06.71--""'---"'"- ""_' INSTRUMENT'SUPPLIES-
105849 MATT - CHLOR. INC. S459.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
x
105850 LARRY W. MCLEMORE $29.58 MILEAGE EXPENSE
m -105851 --- ---'-MICR OA6E-COMP UT ER-- ---T'--------------A1L 154.E Y---'------- - COMPUTER/SOFTWARE --- -
'' 105852 MICROAGE COMPUTER STORES $470.02 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
" 105853 14ITCHELL MANUALS. INC. $134.94 PUBLICATIONS
H
-105859 . . ..-....._..- ..NONTPOY-SUPPLY' CO r___._ -------- . __.__ ..___._. . . _._- 15b 95"'._. ..__-. .-... _. OFFICE SUPPLIES ._.
. 105855 MOTOROLA, INC. $62,893.65 PAGERS H.0.2-14-90
109856 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN $35.93 PUBLICATIONS
Li --105857_.-__-.-NATIONAL-tUMBER- ._---...__...-._._.._.-_..-..__._ $426-18 _ ..___...... ._.- ..... LUMBER_. -._.__. .. .. . . . .
105858 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES, INC. 1687.50 SEWER INSPECTIONS DIST 7
105859 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $199.43 HARDWARE
195860 ---------GUST-K.r-NEWBERG CONST. CO.----- -- S3.458.379.00- -"- -'- ---' CONSTRUCTION Ph33
105861 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $85.00 INSTRUMENT PART
105862 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5.96 WATER USEAGE
- -----105863 - - ---------NDRTH SUPPLY ------------ - -$529.54 -- - -- --- - ' COMPUTER PARTS
105864 O.M.S./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO S11489.00 TRASH BIN REMOVAL
105865 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES S510.15 SAFETY GLASSES
105866 OFFICE PAVILION/IN7ERIOR RES. $355.73 OFFICE FURNITURE
105867 OX SYSTEMS CO. $74,136.71 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90
105868 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $2,568.58 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
-105869 - - ORANGE- VALVE. & FITTING CO. - - -- -- - - $1,721.12 - - INSTRUMENT PARTS
ID5870 OSCAR°S LOCK S SAFE $159.42 BUILDING REPAIRS
105871 OXYGEN SERVICE 1632.68 SPECIALTY CASES
.� 105872 COUNTY OF ORANGE S62.625.00 DISPOSAL GATE PEE
105873 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $338.86 TOOLS
305874 PACIFIC PROCESS EOUIPMENT.INC. $3.136.02 FREIGHT
-- 105875 --- --- PACO PUMPS -- - - - -- - - -- - - 1827.48 PUMP PARTS -
305876 PACIFIC BELL $735.68 TELEPHONE SERVICE
'I 105R77 PACTEL CELLULAR 574.20 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
FUND NO ( 9 - JT DIST YORKTNG CSPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/22/90 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
:I CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/28/9D
WARRANT NO. - -- VENDOR - - AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
105878 PAINE f ASSDCIATES S278.75 CONSULTING - PUBLIC RELATIONS DIST 7
- 105879- - -------PARTS UNLIMITED- - - - - — -- - - ---- 91,064.78 TRUCK PARTS
ICI 105880 PAUL-MUNROE HYDRAULICS $443.88 CYLINDER REPAIRS
105881 ROY PENDERGRAFT S445.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
--- - 305882 -------PENINSULA- PUMP CORP. - -- - -- - - - $382.50 VALVE -
105863 PERIPHERAL SYSTEMS, INC S2,338.69 OFFICE MACHINE
105889 PN0T0 f SOUND CO. $217.50 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
- --1 OSBBS ----Pl-TNEY-BOYES - -----_ ---_---- - --- --- - s1,059.00- - - _- -- SERVICE-AGREEMENT-- -
1058B6 POLY PURE. INC. $14,614.21 POLYMERS H.O.1-10=90
105887 POSTMASTER S340.00 ANNUAL P.O. BOX FEE
s
-- -105888- POWER-ELEG T0.0-SUPPLY-EO.----- f12.13-- - - - -- ---- -- - - ELECTRIC 6UPPLI¢S - -
105889 POWER SYSTEMS $1.982.00 ENGINE PARTS
105890 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $72.00 ICE
- ---1 0 5 891-----THE-PROJECTS-SOLUTION-60•-------"------f7Y049.9P-- --------- ---- INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88
105892 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS f118.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
105893 MAY'S MACHINERY $2,284.38 HARDWARE
------105894---------RCD VAL-VG-CO.,-INC. -------------- S2r171.53- - ---- --- -- PLUMBING SUPPLIES -
�:'- 105895 RED WING SHOES S164.61 SAFETY SHOES
1015896 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 9319.39 VALVE PART
5---105897-- REMOLD-FOYER-i RANSMI SSI ON -----------f1r239.N----------- BUSHINGS — - - - - - - -w -
105898 DETECTOR ELECTRONICS 912S.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS
-'
105 ROACH WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5672.65 PARTS
' H ...105900 900- --J.-R.-0.08 FRP5-CORP.------- i79,895.70 CONSTRUCTION d-17
105901 ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY s620.37 CREASE
W` 105902 RONAN ENGINEERING CO. $1,481.43 ELECTRIC PARTS
--- 105903-----ROSEMOUNT/UNTLOG-- ------------s731.54--- --- - -INSTRUMENT PARTS ----- - -
105904 RUTAN S TUCKER S1,609.50 LEGAL SERVICES - I/W ENFORCEMENT
105905 S4FETY-KLEEN CORP. $132.80 PARTS CLEANER
- 105906 _-__.-.--SANCON-ENGINEERING-. INC.- ---------- ------31.200.00------------ ------ENGINEKRING SERVICES -
105907 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. S90.256.53 CONSTRUCTION P1-27-162
105908 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTrL S76,015.57 OCEAN SAMPLING M.0.6-14-89
- - 105909 ----SEA-BIRD-ELECTRONICS riNF•------ ------------- - -- S446.50 --- ----- INSTRUMENT REPAIR -
105910 SEAL BLACK $73.05 ASPHALT
105911 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $8.324.04 TOOLS
105912 -- -SHEPHERD-MACHINERY CO------ -- --- . -_ ._ . ._ S962.24 - - HARDWARE -
105913 SIGN MART $4,675.00 PRINTING
105914 SLIDE MASTER S267.75 PRESENTATION AIDS
`......--105915-.._____--SMITH-EMERY-CO. .____ .___-_._.__. ._......._.. ..___. _.. __... S845.58 .. _ _.. - SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89. ..
105916 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. S71.68 TOOLS
105917 SOLAR TURBINES INC. S3.022.52 FUEL PUMP
105918 -- - SO. COAST-AIR QUALITY --- .- $859.00 APPLICATION FEES
105919 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY S40Rn•00 APPLICATION FEES
105920 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. S379,175.69 POWER
105921 - -- -- - $0.. CAL.-GAS -CO. . , $9.695.51 NATURAL GAS
105922 enNYNrnN rA, .P- rae r^- VOID •SL LAS�3P
105923 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. S90.63 WATER USEAGE
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3122/90 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
-. ..COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - - - _- - -- - ---
CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/20/90
' - WARRANT NO. ---------- ------ -VENDOR ----- - AMOUNT - DESCRIPTION - - -
105924 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 910.00T.31 DIESEL FUEL
----- 105925 ------ SPAGESAVER-SYSTEMS,-INC. $1,867.58 - -- -- -- - FILING SYSTEM'- - -- -'- -
105926 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 31.314.15 DRINKING WATER
105927 STAMEN 2. SPASSOFF. P.E. 913.209.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162.PI-34-2
---105928-----SPECTRUM--TECHNOLOGY - - --------- -- -- --f132.00----- ----- ""' - OFFICE REPAIRS---- ---- - -
105929 SPEEDE SPEEDOMETER $76.08 DRIVER TESTING
105930 STAR TOOL t SUPPLY CO. 3729.46 TOOLS
5241.52 ____ __._________ _. STEEL-_ _________ ._
105932 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE t NAINT. 23,847.00 CONTRACT LANDSCAPING M.O.8-9-89
105933 SUPELCO♦ INC. 5139.38 LAB SUPPLIES
- --- I85934-- -SUPER INTENDENT-OF-DOGUMENTS----------5295.00--------- PUBLICATIONS
' ---- -- --- - - '-
105935 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL, INC. $3.322.49 TOOLS
105936 T t C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS. INC 5802.92 ELECTRIC PARTS
- --105937-- TCH-ASS 061 AYES-- --i 1.O10.00----- --------- LAB SUPPLIES-------- - -- - - -
105938 INC ENVIRONMENTAL 58.895.71 CONSULTING SERVICES - AIR TOKICS
105939 TAYLOR-DUNN f25.26 TRUCK PARTS
----1P5940--- THERMO-ANALYTICAL.-d NC.1NORCAL '1307.PO --- LAB SERVICES - -
105941 THURO t ASSOC. $2.376.00 GROUNDING SURVEY
m 105942 TILE MATTERS $169.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
>G 105943 TINE-ELOGK-SALES-A-6ERVI-CE- ---f75.DO----- CLOCK-REPAIR m 195944 TONY•S LOCK 0 SAFE SERVICE 9157.13 KEYS/LOCKS
a 105945 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE. INC. 5759.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICES 2-26-3
-----105946- TRANSPORTAT-TOR-CNART ER-S[R V16E -------f261.7C----------BUS RENTAL------------- ' -"'- -- -
�j 105947 TRAVEL TRAVEL $1,198.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
a` 105948 TRUCK t 4UT0 SUPPLY. INC. $6,635.52 TRUCK PARTS
--105949 ----J.G.-TUCKER-t-SON.-INC-- -- -------92.510.31- SAFETY SIGNS—-'- '-- -_.__..
105950 TWINING LABORATORIES OF - $15,628.50 SOIL TESTING 6-14-89
105951 ULTRA SYSTEMS 54.191.68 ENGINEERING SERVICES
v -23.171.69--------- - ----- - ELECTRIC REPAIR9 -- --- --- '
- - 105952�-------0NIC0.EL€CTR IC---- -------�---.----_.._
105953 UNITED ELECTRIC SUPPLY 5759.54 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
105954 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $271.47 PARCEL SERVICES
- 195955 ---- -_ .__.MILLAR-ELEVATOR-COMPANY---- ------------- --------f326.15------- ----- - --- SERVICE AGREEMENT--- - ---
:I 105956 UPJOHN HEALTHCARE SERVICES $425.00 CPR TRAINING
105957 VWR SCIENTIFIC $8.260.72 LAB SUPPLIES
105958 ------ ---VALLEY--CITIES SUPPLY CO.--- -- - - -----. ._. - 55.661.27 - - -- ---- -- - FITTINGS - - --
105959 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1.137.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
105960 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5423.74 SAFETY SIGNS
` .._._..-105961 ---.-VILLAGE--NURSERIES .-._----- .._. -. .__._..__ ....._ . . __ --$40.91 - -_._-__-__._._ .._-__. CROUNDCOVER
105962 WESTATES CARBON. INC. $1,976.25 CARBON
105963 WESTERN WHOLESALE CO. $146.10 TRUCK PARTS
105964 - - .WILCON IND. - - - - S1B3.40 - - INSTRUMENT PARTS
105965 WILLOAN ASSOCIATES $27.122.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-2.2-27.2-29
105966 ROURKE t WOODRUFF $35.144.49 LEGAL SERVICES H.0.6-4-89
105967- -____ . -_ XEROX CORP. _ -_ .__-___-___ _ S1,006.20 .-. -... _ COPIER LEASES _... - .
105968 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES 51.622.79 VALVES
�1 105969 YELLOU SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $254.68 LAB REPAIRS
fl CC
FUND NO ! 79 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSPNG D/TE 3/22/90 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
L. -----_ - ---- - - -COUNTY -SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -
a
CLAIMS PAID 03/28/90 POSTING DATE 03/28/90
�I WARRANT NO - ----- VENDOR -- - AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
'l -. .. . .
' 105974 MORRIS PING S482.45 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE
305971 - -------- PORK- INTERNATIONAL-- -��------ � �- - ----�--- � s609.56 - -� OIL- -
±I 105972 ZIERARTH AND ALPER S327.033.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-37
105973 RICHARD 8. EDGAR S200.0F DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
105974 -- -- HENRY-V.-WEDAA ----- -------- - -- - -- - - - S247.00 - -- -- -- - LIABILITY CLAIM--- - --
----------------
------TOTAL CLAIMS-PAID--03/28/90-- $8 687,230.49
SUMMARY AMOUNT
� ..- . 01 CONST FUND-__.__.___...__-- _-_.__ __..--___.__-....- f.__. ..1,706.64..__.
12 OPER FUND 4,167.67
" 12 CAP PAC FUND 1.223 608 24
02 CONST-FUND_.__- .-._._ -- ------ _. __. ._3a06087
03 OPER FUND 5.499.73
h �xm4 /3 CAP FAC FUND 2l 001.33
h-y -03-COMET-FUND_--_ ____- -.__ ---_.-3a316a55-..-.-_..__
"i 05 OPER FUND 5,170.96
05 CAP FAC FOND 258.769.38
- - 06 OPER FUND __._-....._-..._ ._ .____.____- _.___-..__... _ __- .. . 266.19 ....__ ..-.. _.. .... - .._._ .. .-. ___. _ _
m 16 CAP PAC FUND 461.01
�. 07 OPER FUND 9,610.34
--07 CAP FAC-FUND-- 284,172.97 ._-__-_ ._-
ill OPER FUND 10,687.08
114 CAP FAC FUND 529.246.16
6 /566 OPER FUND. _.___. ____ _..-._. _.___.___ _- __. ..______- _ _. 3,238.73-_ ___
0566 CAP PAC FUND 325.88
0667 OPER FUND 34.88
..._ 47614.OPER YUND----. _._ ___—__ _ . ..4,219.60
JT OPER FUND 1,030,159.04
CORP 5,175,046.30
' SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND -- -- - - - -- - - 6,079.75 - - - -- - - --- - -- -
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 107.381.19
f 8,687,230.49
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
�.d April 18, 1990 - 7:30 p.m.
Orange Public Library
101 North Center Street
Orange, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of April 11, 1990, the Board of
Directors Of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, met
in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date at the Orange Public
Library.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and
the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT: Roland E. Bigonger, Chairman, Dan Griset, William D.
Mahoney, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickler,
and Don E. Smith
DIRECTORS ABSENT: A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Arthur Newton, Wayne Silzel and
Roger R. Stanton
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown,
Secretary, Gary G. Streed, Thomas M. Dawes, Corinne
Clawson, Jeff Esber and Judy Lee
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Malcolm Jahr,
Elisabeth Charron, Eileen Larcome, H. R. Kinder,
Lewis R. Mote, Richard P. Thomas, Robert V.
Peringer, Carole Walters, Dennis Duffy, Perry
Walker, Bill Leming, Jan Duffy, George Gorham, Lee
Kearney, Mildred Jahr, Robert Engelhardt, Chris
Barnes, Dave Barnes, Lorraine John, Mira Arthur,
Greg Bogart, C. F. Credell , M. Moore, D. Ebert, Ron
Sands, Jim Houk, Al Burd, Charles A. Miles, Edward
Mozer, Morris and Elsie Hammond, V. Bonaddio, Audrey
Herdrich, Maynard Herdrich and Arlene Hughes
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Public Hearing on proposal to
collect adopted annual sewer
service charges On the property tax
bills and On the Sewer Service
Charge Report for 1990-91
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open
at 7:32 p.m.
He then announced that the purpose of the public hearing was to consider
a written report pertaining to the providing of sewer service for all
properties within the District, and the proposal to collect the adopted
sewer use fee on the property tax roll beginning with the 1990-91 fiscal
year.
4/18/90
DISTRICT 2
Staff Report on proposed use of the The General Manager stated that the County
an _
County of Orge property tax bill Sanitation District is responsible for for collection of the annual sewer transporting, treating and disposing of
service charge sewage in a safe manner in accordance with
strict federal and state laws to protect
the public health and safety and the environment. He observed that some of
the citizens attending the hearing had not had an opportunity to acquaint
themselves with the role that the District plays in managing wastewater and
showed a video presentation on the Districts' activities.
The Director of Finance then reviewed the staff's reports on District
No. 2's financial plan, summarized as follows:
The Orange County Sanitation Districts' cost of providing sewerage service
to the community has been escalating rapidly because of the increasingly
stringent federal and state laws and regulations requiring advanced
treatment of wastewater to remove toxic materials and other pollutants from
the sewage to assure protection of the public health and safety and the
environment. To comply with the new stricter requirements, the Joint
Sanitation Districts have constructed sophisticated treatment facilities at
a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars over the past few years.
For several years property tax revenues have been insufficient to meet the
District' s operating costs, and it has been necessary for the District to
draw down its reserves. In fiscal year 1990-91, without appropriate
measures to protect the District's financial integrity, it would have been
necessary for the Board to authorize a transfer of $12 million in capital
reserves from the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund to the
Operating Fund to pay the full costs of operating and maintaining the
District collection system and its proportionate share of the operating and
maintenance costs of the Joint Treatment Works. By 1993-94 the District
will require additional revenues in the amount of $80.3 million to meet its
operating expenses and maintain the solvency of the fund due to insufficient
tax revenues.
To address this fiscal challenge, in 1989, after considerable study of the
District's long-range funding requirements, the Board adopted a financial
program to avoid projected revenue shortfalls and provide the necessary
income required to finance the District' s rising operating expenses, as well
as major capital expenditures for construction of master-planned sewerage
facilities.
The Board's adopted financial program includes a one-time connection fee
of $2,270 per dwelling unit for residential property and a $450 per
1,000 sq. ft. charge for commercial , industrial and governmental property.
The connection fee is used to pay for expansion of capital facilities to
serve new development. Mr. Streed advised that in 1986 District 2 issued
$44.3 million in long-tern debt to protect their capital reserves.
As the second element of the long-range financial program, to pay for costs
of operating, maintaining and rehabilitating the sewerage system, the Board
adopted annual sewer service fees, as follows:
-2-
4/18/90
DISTRICT 2
Type of Property Annual Fee
- Single-family Residence $55.00
- Multi-family Residence/Mobile Home 33.00
- Cortmercial 39.00/1,000 sq. ft.
- Industrial 39.00/1,000 sq. ft.
- Governmental 39.00/1,000 sq. ft.
The Director of Finance noted that the large commercial or industrial
dischargers that place an inordinant demand on the District's system are
also subject to an additional surcharge under a separate industrial waste
ordinance that has been in effect since 1976. Some large industrial
industrial dischargers pay as much as $729,211 per year under this program.
The Director of Finance, utilizing a slide presentation, summarized
the District's organizational make-up and their wastewater management
program. He also reviewed the following three billing and collection
alternatives that had been identified and evaluated by the staff:
- Direct Billing and Collection by District
This approach would require the Sanitation District to send a direct
bill on a periodic basis to every property owner within the
District. The one-time setup cost for this method is estimated at
$432,000 plus an annual cost of $302,400, making the total cost for
the first year $734,400. The projected five-year cost for the
direct billing alternative would be $1,944,000.
- Placement of User Fee on Local Water Service Bills for Collection
and Remittance to District
Under this method the sewer service charge would be included as a
separate line item on the bill of the more than 20 water utilities
that serve the properties within District No. 2. He noted that a
major problem of this method is that with the numerous water
purveyors involved it would be difficult to establish a uniform
system which adds significantly to the cost; and the reluctance of
the water utilities to become the billing agent. The setup cost for
this alternative would be $374,000 plus an annual cost of $726,800,
for a total cost for the first year of $1,100,800. The estimated
five-year cost of performing this billing service is $4,008,000.
- Placement of User Fee on County of Orange Property Tax Bill for
Collection and Remittance to District
Under this alternative the sewer service charge would be included as
a separate line item on the property tax bills for all properties
within District No. 2. The setup cost would be $374,000. The annual
cost of billing under this method is only $67,700. The total
first-year cost would be $441,700 and the five-year cost is estimated
to be $712,500.
-3-
4/18/90
DISTRICT 2
Mr. Streed observed that this method would save the property owner
both directly because of significantly lower costs to the District,
and indirectly because the cost of making periodic payments by the
property owner would be reduced.
Staff recommended this alternative as it is clearly the most
cost-effective billing and collection method available.
Districts 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 have already adopted this method for
billing their user fees, and it has proven quite effective in
keeping the administrative costs for billing and collecting fees
under control in these six Districts.
The Director of Finance reiterated that the rising costs to operate the
District are due to higher mandated levels of treatment and increased
energy costs. The long-range financial program was adopted by the
District. because the District's revenues and reserves were decreasing
and soon the District would not have been able to meet its operational
requirements without an additional revenue source.
Mr. Streed then observed that although many of the issues posed by the
public were not really relevant to the specific purpose of the hearing,
he recognized that the citizens have a genuine interest in the
activities of the Sanitation Districts and he, therefore, summarized
responses to those questions that had been raised thus far in the three
workshops and in telephone inquiries. He explained the role of the
District as an operating utility providing an essential service
necessary for the protection of the public health and safety, and
indicated that the District was established solely to provide wastewater
collection, treatment and disposal services to the community.
The Director of Finance further explained that while the District has
always had the statutory authority to levy a sewer service fee, it had
historically financed its operations, maintenance and rehabilitation
activities from the property tax. The adopted sewer service charge is
based upon use, thus, he reported, it is not a tax and is not subject to
Proposition 13 and 62 provisions. Property taxes are based on the value
of the property and have no direct relationship to use. Mr. Streed
reiterated that the reason for the proposal to collect this fee on the
tax bill is because it is the most cost-effective method, and has no
bearing on whether it is defined as a tax or a fee.
Mr. Streed also reiterated the impact of evolving federal and state
regulatory requirements on the District's activities and costs, the cost
reduction measures implemented by the Districts, the basis of the fee
structure for various purposes and for the various classes of users and
the statutory provisions under which the fees were adopted, and then
reviewed cash flow projections. The reduction in tax revenues resulting
from the passage of Proposition 13 and its implementing legislation,
combined with the higher energy costs, the effects of inflation over the
past several years, and more stringent treatment requirements mandated
by federal , state and local regulatory agencies, would result in
depleting reserves and projected operating deficits for the District
without the new fees.
-4-
4/18/90
DISTRICT 2
The Director of Finance then highlighted the appeal process available to
allow for an adjustment of fees in the event of a demonstrated inequity.
Appeals relative to inaccurate billings or properties that are not
connected to local sewers are handled on a case-by-case basis.
The General Manager then reiterated that the purpose of the hearing was
to receive public commentary on the District's proposal to collect the
annual service charge on the property tax bill. He also advised that
official notice of the hearing was mailed during the latter part of
February and early March to 139,611 property owners of record on the
last equalized assessment roll of the County of Orange, in accordance
with the provisions of Section 5473.1 of the California Health and
Safety Code.
As prescribed by law, a legal notice of the hearing was published in the
Orange County Register on March 28, 1990 and again on April 4, 1990.
The hearing notice included the District's telephone number for citizens
to call with questions or for more information. The staff received
approximately 120 calls. Staff also conducted two workshops to answer
questions about the proposal and the District's operations. The
workshops were held at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 13, at the Fullerton
Museum Center, 15 people attended; and Thursday, March 22, at the Backs
Building in Placentia, 7 people attended.
Receive and file Sewer Service Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Charge Report for Fiscal Year 1990-91
That the County Sanitation District
No. 2 Sewer Service Charge Report for Fiscal Year 1990-91 be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file written comments The General Manager reported that
89 written communications had been
received regarding the sewer service fee and proposed method of
collection and summarized the comments; whereupon,
It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the written communications received from the property owners listed
on "Attachment 1" to these minutes, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
Oral Public Comments
Chairman Bigonger reported that it has been the Board' s experience that
most residents of the County do not have the information nor knowledge
concerning the importance of the role that the County Sanitation
Districts play in their lives. In order to guarantee the protection of
the public health and our environment, particularly the ocean waters, as
described and shown earlier in the meeting, very elaborate and complex
and costly procedures must be undertaken to provide the sewage treatment
service for the residents.
-5-
4/18/90
DISTRICT 2
The Chairman reiterated that the purpose of the meeting was not for the
Board to consider the adoption of a sewer use charge or to consider
increasing an existing use charge. The sole purpose was to select the
method by which the charge, which was adopted by the Board on
February 14, 1990 after two years of study and five public meetings, is
to be collected. It is now important to find the most cost-effective
way of collecting this revenue, which is necessary to pay for
District 2's sewer system and its share in the operation and maintenance
of the joint treatment and disposal facilities.
Mr. Bigonger acknowledged that some persons were concerned about the
adoption of fees, charges and taxes, but again stressed that this is not
the scope of this hearing. He asked that any testimony or statements
given address solely the collection method, and not whether the fee was
liked or disliked. The Chairman invited anyone with some specific
concerns regarding the charge to leave their name and address and the
staff would contact them. He added that if they wished to write the
District, their request would be given due consideration and answered at
a later date.
The Chair then recognized the following persons who addressed the Board
regarding the proposed method for billing and collection of the annual
sewer service charge:
- Malcolm Jahr, 17292 E. Orange, Yorba Linda
Mr. Jahr questioned the cost differential between the alternative
utilizing local water service bills for collection and remittance to
the District or utilizing the County of Orange property tax bill for
collection. It was his contention that since local water service
companies already had a billing system in place, the cost shouldn't
be as high as indicated by the District to add their sewer service
fee. He objected to use of the tax bill and requested that the
charge be collected on the local water bills, which would, in his
opinion, afford him the opportunity to lodge any protest regarding
the sewer service fee with his elected City representatives rather
than with the District 2 Board.
In response, staff reiterated that there were numerous local water
purveyors, and it would be difficult to develop agreements with each
of them. In addition, the service charge to collect said fee on
behalf of the District (probably 5%) , would be added to the user fee
in order to provide the necessary revenue to meet the District's
financial obligations. Additional staffing required for
recordkeeping associated with this method of collection also accounts
for some of the additional costs.
- Elisabeth Charron, 10432 Mildred Avenue, Garden Grave
Ms. Charron objected that the Notices of Public Hearing were sent
as bulk mail . She also criticized the workshop and public hearing
sites.
..
-6-
4i1ai90
DISTRICT 2
Ms. Charron protested that if the user fee is placed on the County
tax bill , the property owner would be forced to pay the charge along
with their taxes inasmuch as the County will not accept a partial
payment of the bill . She contended that the District had not fully
investigated the costs of other alternative methods of collection
such as local water bills.
She also questioned the equity of the fee structure and the process
for contesting the charge. Ms. Charron stated her objection to the
public notice procedure the District is required to follow in
connection with adoption of an ordinance establishing these fees and
for any future adjustments in the fees.
- Eileen Larcome, 4605 Wimaurie Avenue, Santa Ana
Ms. Larcome stated that she objected to placement of the sanitary
sewer service charge on the property tax bill . She suggested the use
of television to publicize the fee. She questioned whether it was an
annual fee and if it might be adjusted at some point during the year.
She also inquired whether she would know if the fee were increased.
In response, the District's General Counsel explained that this is an
annual sewer service charge. Any adjustments in the fee as a result
of futher study and recommendation by the staff would require
adoption of a new ordinance. The notice of public hearing on
adoption of the ordinance would be published in a major newspaper, as
required by statute. The adjusted fee would still appear as a
separate line item on the tax bills.
- H. R. Kinder, 1342 E. Hickory Lane, Orange
Mr. Kinder also commented on the notice procedure relative to
adoption of the sanitary sewer service charge. He also stated that
he assumed future fees might decrease rather than increase. He
expressed concern that the fee would not be itemized on his tax bill .
In response, staff advised that the fee will be shown as a separate
line item on the tax bills.
- Lewis R. Mote, 527 N. Harbor Blvd. , Anaheim
Mr. Mote stated that he realized that his questions relative to the
District' s high operating costs listed on the Notice of Public
Hearing were not the issue that evening, but still wanted to
register his concern relative to the increase in expenses projected
through 1993-94. He added that he was in agreement with the previous
speakers' comments.
- Richard P. Thomas, 4431 East Olivebranch Way, Anaheim
Mr. Thomas addressed the issue of equitability relative to the
adopted charges for commercial and industrial buildings. He stated
that, in his opinion, it would be more equitable to base the charge
�.: on water use rather than on square footage. Mr. Thomas urged the
District to find a more equitable method of computing the fee.
-7-
4/18/90
DISTRICT 2
- Robert V. Peringer, 231 So. Parklane, Orange
Mr. Peringer expressed his appreciation for the services of
Sanitation District No. 2. He then stated his objection to �.✓
collection of what, in his opinion, were additional taxes in the
guise of a user fee. He commented on the increase in the budget
this year for the County of Orange and felt the District's financial
requirements should be included in that amount. Mr. Peringer also
inquired whether the Districts collect user fees for other
governmental agencies to evade the limitations of Proposition 13.
In response, staff pointed out that County Sanitation District No. 2
was a special district created under the County Sanitation District
Act and was separate and apart from general purpose government known
as Orange County government. Accordingly, District No. 2's
operation and maintenance requirements are not included in the
County budget.
Staff also advised that none of the fees collected on behalf of the
Sanitation Districts go to any other agency. All fees are solely
for the collection, treatment and disposal of sewage.
- Carole Walters, 534 N. Shaffer Street, Orange
Ms. Walters stated that she had mistakenly believed that the hearing
that evening concerned the adoption of the sanitary sewer service
fee. She also commented that she felt the fee structure should
include an allowance for senior citizens.
- Dennis Duffy, 11752 Reva Drive, Garden Grove
Mr. Duffy expressed his concerns relative to the equitability of the
fee. He suggested that the criteria for establishing the charge be
based on water usage rather than the type of property connected to
the sewer.
The Board questioned whether he was suggesting that sewage meters be
installed in every household and if he would prefer to pay the
higher cost of metering. Mr. Duffy replied that the District should
work with the local water companies to receive information necessary
to bill the property owners. He did, however, acknowledge that it
would be difficult to determine the actual amount of water being
discharged into the sewer based solely upon the amount of water
received. He contended that the District could obtain the necessary
information from the local water companies to compute the bills and
still collect the charges on the property tax bills. Mr. Duffy also
conceded that he would prefer to pay the lowest cost possible.
- Perry Walker, 12281 Lampson, Garden Grove
Mr. Walker questioned the criteria used by the District to establish
the fee for a single-family residence versus an apartment building.
-8-
4/18/90
DISTRICT 2
Mr. Walker also questioned whether apartment owners would be
properly billed for the number of units they owned. He noted that
he had observed various apartment complexes in his area that were
not on record with the County of Orange as apartments.
In response, staff advised that studies conducted by the Districts,
as well as other agencies, indicate that the discharge from
apartments is approximately 60% of the amount discharged from a
single-family residence. Accordingly, the fee structure provides
for a 60% differential in the charge per unit. Multiple units are
billed based on the County Assessor's official property records.
- Bill Leming, 2720 E. Walnut Avenue, R7, Orange
Mr. Leming stated his objection to the method of collection. He
also contended that the sewer service charges should be based on
water usage, not on the type of property owned. In his opinion, the
user fee is more like a property tax and is inequitable, especially
for the owners of small commercial buildings. He reiterated that
his main complaint was that the District didn't provide for
equitability in the fee structure.
- Jan Duffy, 11752 Reva Drive, Garden Grove
Mrs. Duffy also questioned the equity of the fee structure because
of different household occupancies. She stated that the charge
should be collected on water bills and should be based on usage
rather than be a flat fee.
In conclusion, in response to the public commentary on equitability of
the user fee, staff reiterated that large commercial and industrial
dischargers pay under a separate ordinance based upon their demand on
the sewer system. Some pay as much as $729,000 per year in District 2.
Staff also pointed out that a new study would be conducted to address
the equity issue, and that any forthcoming recommendations for changes
would be submitted to the Districts' Boards at a later date.
Close hearing There being no further public
comments, the Chairman then declared
the hearing closed at 9:10 p.m.
Adopting a finding that the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ma Ority of property owners have
not protested relative to That the Board of Directors does hereby
collecting annual sewer service find that a majority of the owners of
Charges on the property tax bills the property, which is the subject of
the Sewer Service Charge Report for
Fiscal Year 1990-91, have not protested the proposed collection of annual
sewer service charges on the property tax bills.
-9-
4/18/90
DISTRICT 2
Adoption of Sewer Service Charge Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Report for Fiscal Year 1990-91
That the County Sanitation District
No. 2 Sewer Service Charge Report for Fiscal year 1990-91 be, and is hereby,
adopted.
Directing the County Auditor- Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Controller to include sewer service
charges on property tax bills That the Board of Directors hereby
beginning in 1990-91 adopts Resolution No. 90-38-2,
directing the County Auditor-Controller
to include sewer service charges on property tax bills beginning in fiscal
year 1990-91 for collection, pursuant to Ordinance No. 210 of County
Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County. Said resolution, be reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9: 12 p.m. , April 18, 1990.
<ZL. ko6.
Secretary, B�_
o d of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 2 of
Orange County, California
-10-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
I ALLIS AV ME
'a W.9127
April 11, 1990 wuxruw vAnalt983u13ow'A n22e.A127
DISTRICT 2 PROPOSAL TO COLLECT USER FEE
ON PROPERTY TAX BILL
Summary of Written Comments Received Throuah April 10, 1990
SUPPORT PROPOSAL PREFER USE OF WATER BILL
Marilyn R. Cochran Greene and Frazier
211 S. Redwood Ave. Certified Public Accountants
Brea, CA 92621 1240 Lakeview Ave.
Anaheim, CA 92807
DISTRICT SHOULD CUT COSTS INEQUITABLE RATE STRUCTURE
L. T. Mazzola William S. Harvey
2825 Firethorne Ave. Developer & Real Estate Broker
Fullerton, CA 92635 PO Box 1514
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
Stanford Park
PROPOSITION 13 10352 Stanford Ave.
Garden Grove, CA 92640
Robert M. Ames
1527 W. Earle Place
Anaheim, CA 92802
"ATTACHMENT 1" TO APRIL 18, 1990 MINUTES
DISTRICT No. 2
PROPERTIES NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER
Anaheim
Barksdale, Anthony W. Harris, Paul D.
Barksdale, Patricia A. 4910 Santa Ana, Cyn Rd.
181 S. Possum Hollow Anaheim, CA 92807
Anaheim, CA 92807
Earnest Ronald E. Liggett, Francis Sherman
Barnes, Carol M. 571 S. Peralta Hills Dr.
7675 Eucalyptus Way Anaheim, CA 92807
Anaheim, CA 92808
Chadez, Victor Lopez, Antonio H.
5426 E. Orangethorpe Ave. 1342 N. Miller St.
Anaheim, CA 92807 Anaheim, CA 92806
Chavez, David J. Ponteprino, Meyer E.
4420 E. La Palma Ave. 1471 N. Placentia Ave.
Anaheim, CA 92807 Anaheim, CA 92806
Fountain, Evart C. Ritter, Larry R.
1432 W. Roberta Ritter, Maria E.
Fullerton, CA 92633 191 S. Possum Hollow
Anaheim, CA 92808
Bale, Patricia Ann
101 S. Eucalyptus Dr. Vista Del Rio Ro Water Group
Anaheim, CA 92808 PO Box 17073
Anaheim, CA 92817
Fullerton
Donegan, Craig R. Taylor, Burt L.
Donegan, Pamela T. 1220 Linda Lane
3110 Las Faldas Dr. Fullerton, CA 92631
Fullerton, CA 92635
Moisi, Joseph A. Teasdale, Audrey B.
1300 Sunnycrest Dr. 400 E. Las Palmas Dr.
Fullerton, CA 92635 Fullerton, CA 92635
Garden Grove
Garcia, Joe M.
Garcia, Avalon
13141 Palm St.
Garden Grove, CA 92643
DISTRICT No. 2
PROPERTIES NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER
Orange
Amusement Electronics Co. Moore, Melinda C.
19142 Glen Arran Lane 1638 N. Cambridge
Orange, CA 92669 Orange, CA 92667
Bulthuis, Albert Oliver, Andrew L.
1962 N. Glassell St. 805 N. Lincoln St.
Orange, CA 92665 Orange, CA 92667
Byers, Elaine Piper Paulus, Arthur E.
6705 E. Oak Lane PO Box 3035
Orange, CA 92669 Orange, CA 92665
Cosy, Robert C. Perez, Severiano J.
16522 E. Cumberland Ave. Perez, Ruth A.
Orange, CA 92665 16542 Heim Ave.
Orange, CA 92665
Cooper, Jon W.
Cooper, Rathlin M. Ramer, Mary B.
962 Wanda Rd. 3042 N. Sheri St.
Orange, CA 92667 Orange, CA 92665
Estes, Garmon Jr. Ritter, Maurice A.
1902 E. Collins 16372 Heim Ave.
Orange, CA 92667 Orange, CA 92665
Plocken, Marie E. Schuck, Clifford D.
627 Cully Dr. 15581 E. Cully Dr.
Orange, CA 92665 Orange, CA 92665
Hawkins, G. William Shanafelt, John G. Jr.
6807 E. Oak Lane 3827 W. Chapman Ave.
Orange, CA 92669 Orange, CA 92668
Hoffman, William Spielman, Leonard
2396 N. Batavia St. 6719 E. Oak Lane
Orange, CA 92665 Orange, CA 92669
Jefts, Richard M. Travernier, Ernest
16386 Fellows Dr. 16312 Fellows Dr.
Orange, CA 92665 Orange, CA 92665
Johnson, Clayton W. Jr. Walker, William R.
12431 E1 Rancho Place 16352 Heim Ave.
Garden Grove, CA 92640 Orange, CA 92665
LeCouix, James E. - Witt, Richard D.
PO Box 5887 956 N. Shaffer St.
1432 North Glassell Orange, CA 92667
Orange, CA 92613
DISTRICT No. 2
PROPERTIES NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER
Placentia
OLander, Harold H. Phillips, Lasts M.
PO Box 51 2419 N. Rose Dr.
Placentia, CA 92670 Placentia, CA 92670
Santa Ana
Quick, Alvin E.
Quick, Nellie W.
PO Box 5094
Santa Ana, CA 92704
Villa Park
Ehlen, Lawrence H. Metz, Ramey B.
10232 Center Dr. 18605 S. Mesa Dr.
Villa Park, CA 92667 Villa Park, CA 92667
Henderson, Dortha M.
18916 S. Mesa Dr.
Villa Park, CA 92667
Yorba Linda
Asta, Donald W. Crowder, Rutherford H.
Asta, Ingrid M. 5072 Richfield Rd.
5373 Grandview Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Dutton, Roy
Atzet, Frank C. 5642 Grandview Ave.
18820 Oriente Dr. Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Flatten, Orris H.
Basham, U. H. 17745 Lomita Lane
4202 Merienda Lane Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Flynn, Patrick F.
Baxter, Howard L. 5521 Grandview Ave.
4551 Rose Dr. Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Fox, Gregg G.
Covey, Thomas A. 16882 Nightingale Lane
5462 S. Lake View Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Yorba Linda, CA 92686
DISTRICT No. 2
PROPERTIES NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER
Yorba Linda
(Con't)
Hawkins, Eugene S. Morton, Emery L.
5432 Lakeview Ave. 19100 Pradera Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Hoffman, Richard W. Mulkey, Larkin V.
5611 Kellogg Dr. 5832 Ohio St.
Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Imperial-Rose,Co. Oberjuerge, Robert A.
1920 St. Andrews Dr. 18847 Via Sereno
Seal Beach, CA 90740 Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Jagusiak, Mark M. O'Shea, Rita
Jagusiak, Mary B. 4611 N. Palm
19198 Skyview Knoll Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Page, Raymond A.
Jensen, Larry W. PO Box 89
19192 Skyview Knoll Atwood, CA 92601
Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Prosser, Barbara
Kroenlein, Dieter 4588 Danita Lane
5571 Fircrest Dr. Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Sanderfer, Ruby E.
Lankford, James W. 18491 Buena Vista
Lankford, Judy Yorba Linda, CA 92686
4293 Avocado Ave.
Yorba Linda, CA 82686 Shaver, Howard W.
16631 Lathrop Dr.
Leonard, James K. Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Leonard, Dorothy M.
4911 Shaw Lane Shigekawa, William M.
Yorba Linda, CA 92686 206 Copp
Kula, HI 96790
Majors, William J.
4561 N. Palm Ave. Staumont, Ferdinand
Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Staumont, Lenke E.
18101 Avolinda Dr.
Merlo, Joe Yorba Linda, CA 92686
4912 Casa Loma Ave.
Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Stewart, Robert
5641 Mountain View Ave.
Meyers, Byron P. Yorba Linda, CA 92686
4761 Palm Ave.
Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Studer, Leo L.
Studer, Katherine A.
McCormick, William C. 5374 Douglas Lane
4742 Palm Ave. Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Yorba Linda, CA 92686
DISTRICT No. 2
PROPERTIES NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER
Yorba Linda
(Con't)
Warren, Herbert M. Williams, Sidney H.
5251 Highland Ave. 5271 Cherrylee Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Yorba Linda, CA 92686
County Sanitation District No. 11
of
_ Orange County
PROJECT REPORT
Slater Avenue Pump Station
_ Sewage System Improvements
Contract No. 11 - 17
y�TATfp
AgN`G�e C �
❑X Preliminary Report for District Comments Dated 1 2-22-89
❑X Draft Report for City & Others Comments Dated 7-20-90
0 For District Comments Dated 3-20-90
Fx1 Final Report Dated 4-3-90
JOHN CAROLLO
ENGINEERS
R TA vW1�R CTV.G
uxn.xt u• Gouuwm u
aw vum.o.0 ncso-iu
9W UCOO.G WZW9D,G
YO�W,U IDf 1N]fIF$G
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
PROJECT REPORT
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACT NO. 11-17
C i
O ISM
OR ORANGE COUNTY
a _ O
ORECTOR OF ENGINEERING DATE
PRE D UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: 9 FES
a !�-,-,,/ co�5 KAgI 464
LG 4 /,. c z�////1Gl --3 90 �2 hO
R.I.E. DATE O F�
n o No.25772 OI�"
�9. CA C
yr,UF CAU:
r
r
r
TABLE OF CONTENTS
N
PBe Na
r INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 AUTHORMTION ................................................................................................ 1-1
1.3 SCOPE OF WORK............................................................................................... 1-1
1.4 PROJECTTEAM .................................................................................................. 1-3
r SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 GENERAL.......................................................................................................I... 2-1
r 2.2 COLLECTION SYSTEM........................................................................................ 2-1
2.3 PUMPING STATION............................................................................................. 2-2
2.4 PROJECT COSTS.........................._.................................................................... 2-4
2.5 INTDAL CONSTRUCTION..................................................................................... 2-4
2.6 INITIAL PROJECT COSTS BY DI5IT=..............................................................
2.7 CHANGES IN LAND USE..................................................................................... 2-5
COLLECTION SYSTEM
r 3.1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................._............... 3-1
3.2 SCOPE................................................................................................................ 3.1
3.3 DESIGN CRITERIA.............................................................................................. 3-2
3.4 MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................. 3-3
3.5 DISCUSSION OF ALTERNATIVES........................................................................ 3-4
3.6 SEWERAGE TO THE PUMPING STATION............................................................ 3-5
3.7 SEWERAGE FROM THE PUMPING STATION ....................................................... 3-12
3.8 SUMMARY.......................................................................................................... 3-22
3.9 UTILITY SEARCH ................................................................................................ 3-22
3.10 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN ................................................................................. 3-24
3.11 STREET RECONSTRUCTION ............................................................................. 3-25
r
SIATERAVENUE PUMP STATION ANALYSIS
4.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 4-1
4.2 PUMPS................................................................................................................ 4-3
4.3 POWER............................................................................................................... 4-11
4.4 STRUCTURE....................................................................................................... 4-12
4.5 SITE.................................................................................................................... 4-13
4.6 AUXQ]ARY SYSTEMS........................................................_............................... 4-15
r
PROJECT COSTS AND SCHEDULES
r 5.1 GENERAL........................................................................................................... 5-1
5.2 PROJECT COSTS................................................................................................. 5.1
5.3 SCHEDULES........................................................................................................ 5-7
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
.�r (Continued)
Pao No.
COSCALLOCATION
6.1 GENERAL............................................................................................................ 6-1
r 6.2 NEW MPROVEMENCS......................................................................................... 6-1
6.3 EXISTING FACBSf[ES............................................»............................................ 6-4
r
r
r
r
U
r
LIST OF TABLES
eY
Table PAre No.
3-1 Alternative Pipe Sims to Carry 6.55 MOD........................................................... 3-11
3-2 Alternative Pipe Capacities at Minimum Slope....................................................
3-3 Slater Avenue Pump Station Influent Sewer Replacement.................................. 3.13
3.4 Parallel Sewer....................................................................................................
m 3-5 Force Main Hydraulics for Economic Comparison Only...................................... 3-16
3-6 Force Main Pipe Sim Alternatives.......................................................................
3.7 Force Main Comparison Estimated Annual Cost................................................ 3-17
r 3-8 Construction Costs of Alternative Improvements to Sewers................................ 3-19
3-9 Capacity of Existing 24-Inch Nichols Street Gravity Sewer................................. 3-22
5-1 Estimated Unit Prices for Sanitary Sewer Construction...................................... 5-2
5-2 Estimated Projects Costs for Recommended Sewers Tributary to Pumping
Station........................................................................................................... 5-3
5-3 Estimated Projects Costs for Recommended Sewers from Pumping Station....... 5-4
5-4 Slater Avenue Pumping Station Estimated Project Costs.................................... 5-5
5-5 Total Recommended Project Costs...................................................................... 5-6
6-1 Project Cost Split New Improvements................................................................. 6-3
6-2 Cost Basis for Existing Facilities........................................................................ 6-5
6.3 Project Buy-In Costs.......................................................................................... 6-7
r
v
r
v
r
r
r
W
r
LIST OF FIGURES
d
F Page No.
1-1 Existing CSDOC Sewers..................................................................................... 1-2
e 2-1 Recommended Improvements............................................................................ 23
,d 3-1 Existing CSDOC Sewers-Springdale Street....................................................... 3-7
3-2 Existing CSDOC Sewers Slater Avenue.............................................................. 3.9
3-3 Slater Avenue Pump Station Collection System Recommended
Solutions........................................................................................................... 3.23
r
4-1 Slater Avenue Pump Station Site Plan................................................................ 4-2
4-2 ModlBed System Head Curve............................................................................. 4.4
4.3 Falrbanb-Masse Pumps.................................................................................... 4-6
4-4 Sewage Pump Performance Alternative 2............................................................ 4-8
4-5 Sewage Pump Performance Alternative 3............................................................ 4-10
r
5-1 Preliminary Project Schedule............................................................................. 5-8
r
a
r
r
r
r
iv
r
LIST OF APPENDICES
w
Appendix Title or Information Contained
A GTE Site Layouts
Sewer Plan and Profiles
B Master Plan Printouts
C Certification of Utility Inspection
D List of Utilities Contacted and
Index to Utility Plans in JCE Files
E Pumping Station Lease Agreement and
Easement with GTE
F Pump Data
G CSDOC Pump Station Reliability Analysis
r
w
r
s
r
r
v
On June 7, 1989,County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California authorized John Carollo Engineers through Contract No. 11-17
to prepare this Engineering Report which presents a plan for relieving
deficiencies to the.Slater-Springdale Trunk System and the Slater Avenue
w Pump Station and to divert 5.4 MOD to the Miller Holder System for a not
to exceed fee of$44.738.00.
.r
wr
y
�1
A
A
w
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
District No. 11 serves approximately seventy percent of the City of Huntington Beach and rellea
on three main trunk systems to convey flows to Reclamation Plant No. 2: the Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer, the Knott Interceptor and the Coast Trunk. The primary expansion of trunk
facilities within District 11 occurred in the late 1950's. In the northwesterly portion of
District 11. the expansion included construction of the Edinger LfR Station, the Slater Avenue
Trunk. Slater Avenue Pump Station. and the Slater Avenue Force Main and the Nichols Stint
Gravity Sewer which drained to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. Further expansion of the
system was provided by construction of the 5prurgdale-Edinger Relief In 1970, and eatmv of
the Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer, the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension and connection to
the Knon Interceptor in 1974-
.. Current master planning cfforts(l) have found that most of the existing facilities shown in
Figure 1-1 will be deficient for meeting both short-term and long-term capacity requirements.
The most notable deficiencies are the Slater Avenue Pump Station. the Slater Avenue Force
Mains and gravity sewers. all of which will require upsizing to meet planned capacity
requirements. In addition. 5.4 MGD (average flow) from the Slater Avenue system must be
diverted to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer to offset use of the Knott Interceptor by District S to
avert deficiencies throughout the Miler-Holder Trunk Sewer system north of Hazard Avenue.
1.2 AUTHORIZATION
Facing the need for new and larger facilities in order to meet the District's responsibilities for
~ collection of its wastewaters in a mariner which will protect the public health. the District took
action toward alleviating the above-mentioned deficiencies. On June 7th. 1989. County
Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County authorized the preparation of this study by John
Carodo Engineers IJCE).
1.3 SCOPE OF WORK
This project report includes an analysis of the following:
1) A new above-ground Slater Avenue Pump Station including right-of-way
.. requirements:
(1) References are listed at the end of the text.
.-1
nrvwnw.mii s.m..ed.
W
03
IN EDII
1
IY
IZ
at Icc
W 1/2 MILE
IM I 0 1/e
IM
N I i APPROXIMATE SCALE
ILL
1! V
IW
1¢
H
ti
Y
IN
Z F
¢ 10
1Q to
14.
N
�FLOOD 6
1 S� IPHON N /Ft
I WART _• / SEWER N
W • ■NOW a New•sea•NEW aNEW
z
z ;¢ � 1
d � 1
¢ W
n
_ � 0 .
01
1 - � I
la w ' Y < �
� NSLATER-: V 21
N (S-1T)
r•
SLATER-S AVE
Component I//
Slater-Springdale Trunk Sewer 1'
Golden West Trunk Sewer
Nichols Street Gravity Sewer
Knott Interceptor(Reach 2)
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer(Reach 2)
Slater-Springdale(and Edinger Relief Sewer) EXISTING
Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension
Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer CSDOC SEWERS
Slater Avenue Force Main Sewer(New Force Main FIGURE 1-1
Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and Slater Avenue
Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
I� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
W I-2
2) A new force main and gravity sewer along Slater Avenue through Gothard Street
extending approximately to Nichols Sheet;
3) A new gravity sewer between Nichols Street and the Knott Interceptor located at
Newland Street and Slater Avenue;
r
4) The possibility of including full relief capacity in the Knott Interceptor between
Newland Sheet and Magnolia Street;
5) A diversion structure at Magnolia Street and Slater Avenue whereby approximately
_ 5.4 MGD average daily flow from the Knott Interceptor could be diverted to the
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer.
s 6) An analysis of the Nichols Street Gravity Sewer(use D/d = .921;
7) The inlet facilities at the new Slater Pump Station beginning at Slater Avenue and
Golden west Street:
8) The Golden West Trunk Sewer from Slater Avenue to Edinger Avenue:
9) The Hell Avenue Interceptor from Springdale Avenue to Golden West Street.
r Specific Items of work associated with the above Include:
1) Conducting a search of all utilities in the affected streets, including an on-site
r inspection;
2) Preparing preliminary plan and profiles of the recommended sewer improvements:
r
3) Preparing a conceptual traffic plan for mitigating construction impacts;
41 Preparing preliminary pump station layouts as well as a system-head curve for the
pumps:
5) Coordinating with affected agencies. GTE and utilities;
6) Preparing a financial analysis of cost sharing between Districts 3 and 11.
r
1.4 PROJECT TEAM
The project team members are employed by the District (CSDOC) and by JCE. Tom Dawes
(CSDOC) and Dennis Wood [JCE) provided council and control. Chris Ludlow and John
Thohnasov(CSDOC) and Jack McCabe(JCE) managed the project and Nick Arhontes WSDOC)
offered field and technical input.
r
1-3
r
w
w
CHAPTER 2
r
r
chapter 2
.. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
r
2.1 GENERAL
Recommendations are made for the Slater Avenue Pump Station and for sewers flowing to and
from it.
r
2.2 COLLECTION SYSTEM
System recommendations to alleviate capacity deficiencies are summarized below. Prehminary
plan and profile and cross sections of proposed interceptors are included in Appendix A.
A. Sewerage to the Pumping Station
r 1. Slater-Springdale relief should be accomplished by diverting 6.55 MGD to new
27-inch and 36-inch diameter sewers flowing east on Heil Avenue to the
Golden West Trunk Sewer.
2. The Golden West hunk Sewer. in need of replacement for both capacity and
structural reasons. should be removed and replaced in the same location with
a new,42-inch diameter sewer.
3. The pumping station influent pipe on Slater Avenue should be paralleled with
a new 42-inch diameter sewer to a point abreast of the pump station and a
72-inch diameter sewer to the new pump station.
4. A new pumping station with adequate vehicular access should be constructed
east of the existing station.
B. Sewerage from the Pumping Station
— Based on the options discussed in this report. the following recommendations are
made:
r 1. A new 36-inch diameter ductile Iron pump station effluent force main should
be constructed in Slater Avenue to Gothard Street.
.r
r
2-1
r
2. A new 36-inch diameter gravity sewer should be constructed in Slater Avenue
between Gothard Street and Nichols Street.
3. The 5.4 MGD (average flow) should be diverted to the Nichols Street Gravity
w
Sewer.
4. The existing Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension from west of Eoledo Lane
to Beach Boulevard should be paralleled with a 33-inch diameter relief sewer.
5. The existing Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension east from Beach Boulevard
s to Newland Street should be paralleled with a 36-inch diameter relief sewer.
These recommended improvements are shown on Figure 2-1.
2.3 PUMPING STATION
Analysis of pumping station considerations detailed later in this report has led to the following
recommendations:
r
1. Continue to negotiate with GTE for the purchase of a new site east of the existing
pump station.
2. Construct a new pumping station on a site large enough to meet the reliability
standards for safe, convenient access and maintenance.
ee
3. Budd the new above-ground station with five new pumps similar to those at the
Main Street Pumping Station with adequate clear space between mechanical units.
4. Include an emergency diesel generator of adequate size to supply all pump and
station loads. Enclose the stand-by power equipment in a room separate from the
r motor mom.
5. Select exterior building and landscape architecture to present a pleasing
appearance to local residents and to blend in with other existing structures.
6. Design accoustical abatement treatment to make the station quiet.
_ 22
¢
W
QY Q I/< I/P MILE
Z
APPROXIMATE SCALE
i.
W
m 0 E%letlnp Sewers
B W To Remain
�J
W Springdale - Slater Trunk Sewer
�¢
HEIL „rM Slater Ave.
27' rim.. Miller Holder
Y
Z �.t � _.���. Knoa Interceptor
¢ 8� � .......... NIChOIS Street
F
ez �
�a a
N
W
W
� z
8 svnnw SEWER
W ®Q
9u
u
N
y �¢ z 'I' � 1
F J i Z G
C J z
w
waa®�woaa
S A LATEq-R$A I �/
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
FIGURE 2-1
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
-3
2.4 PROJECT COSTS
The estimated project costs for the improvements recommended in this report are as follows:
Sewers to the pumping station $ 8.813.000
Sewers from the pumping station $ 3,738,000
Pumping station $ 5,430,000
Total $17,981,000
�+ Of this estimated cost, District Three's portion would be $1,050.000 while District Eleven's
would be $16,931,000. All costs are based on ENR-LA Index of 6400. This is the projected
cost at mid-point of construction.
r
2.5 INITIAL CONSTRUCTION
Based on field surveys of actual[lows and needs, the following elements would be constructed
initially:
1) The Golden West Trunk Sewer,
.. 2) The Slater Avenue, Pumping Station influent pipe;
r
3) The pumping station:
4) The force main to Gothard Street;
5) The Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer from Gothard to Nichols Street with the Diversion
Structure.
The remaining improvements would be constructed as flows increase in the future.
2.6INITIAL PROJECT COSTS BY DISTRICT
Based on this study, the project costs for the recommended initial construction are as follows:
2-4
s
Estimated Cost
District 3 District 11 Total
r
Golden West Trunk Sewer -- $ 4.302,000 $ 4,302,000
Slater Avenue Pumping Station $ 261.000 $ 476.000 $ 737.000
r Influent Relief Sewer
Slater Avenue Pumping Station and
r 72-inch Influent Sewer $ 657.900 $ 5,G62.200 $ 5,720.000
Force Main to Gothard Street
and
r Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer $ 131,200 $ 1,009,800 $ 1.141,000
from Gothard Street to
Nichols Street with the
.. Diversion Structure
Totals $1.050.000 $10.850,000 $11.900,000
r
_ 27 CHANGES INLAND USE
As this report is being prepared,changes 1n land use are being considered by the City and the
County and they my affect the final size of the facilities recommended herein. These should
be reviewed and Incorporated prior to final design,
r
r
r
r
2.5
r
s
r
CHAPTER 3
chapter3
COLLECTION SYSTEM
3.1 INTRODUCTION
General
•" The area of the CSDOC's collection system studied is in the southwest quadrant of District
No. 3 and the northern portion of District 11. Flows come from District No. 3 primarily from
_ the north and from District 11 from the west. They combine at the Knott Interceptor and flow
to Treatment Plant No. 2.
_ The area of the study is bounded on the west by Springdale Avenue, on the north by Edinger
Avenue, on the east by Magnolia Street, and on the south by Slater Avenue.
r
3.2 SCOPE
The collection system components studied include parts of the following projects:
Component Construction Contract No.
— Slater-Springdale (and Edinger Relief Sewer) 11-11
• Slater Springdale"Runk Sewer 11-6
• Golden West Trunk Sewer 11-3
• Nichols Street Gravity Sewer 11-10-1
• Knott Interceptor (Reach 2) 3-17
— • Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension 11-12
• Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer(Reach 21 3-1
• Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer 11-10-1
• Slater Avenue Force Main Sewer(New Force Main) 11-10-3
• Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and Slater Avenue
Pumping Station and Form Main Sewer I1-10-2
All of the above are shown in Figure 1-1. The Slater Avenue Pump Station is analyzed In
Chapter 4. The Edinger Relief Sewer is net part of this study.
Particularly, this section of the report Includes an analysis of the following:
3-1
1) A new and deep force main flowing eastward on Slater Avenue from the pumping
station past Gothard Street, extending approximately to Nichols Street.
2) A new gravity sewer flowing eastward on Slater Avenue between Nichols Street and
the Knott Interceptor at Newland Street.
3) The possibility of including full relief capacity in the Knott Interceptor on Slater
Avenue between Newland Street and Magnolia Street.
4) The Knott Interceptor and the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at the intersection of
Slater Avenue and Magnolia Street to divert approximately 5.4 MGD (average Row)
from the Knott Interceptor to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer there.
.. 5) The Nichols Street Gravity Sewer.
6) The Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer flow east from Golden West Street to the Slater
Avenue Pumping Station.
7) The Golden West Trunk Sewer south from Edinger Avenue to Slater Avenue.
8) A new relief sewer on Heil Avenue flowing east from Springdale Avenue to Golden
West Street.
After consideration of the design criteria Involved in any new construction, this report
reproduces the gross tabulated recommendations of the Master Plan(1) for the relief of
deficiencies found in the study leading to that plan. Following that, each of the listed parts of
the collection system will be addressed in this chapter with alternative considerations for
implementing recommended solutions.
3.3 DESIGN CRITERIA
District's Standards
The hydraulic design criteria used in the considerations in this report are those stated in the
CSDOC's "Design and Construction Requirements for Sanitary Sewers12). , In addition,
wherever an existing sewer is being considered to remain in service along with a new parallel
line, the same hydraulic criteria (i.e.. D/d) is applied to both.
.. (1) CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineers
(2) CSDOC Design and Construction Requirements for Sanitary Sewers - 1987
3-2
3.4 MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
Flows
Appendix B of this report shows the final computer printouts of the projected year 2020 sewer
r flows used in the Master Plan. Those flows are from Appendix 2C of the Master Plan which was
completed in February 1989(1). That plan also lists the maximum total flow rate at the Slater
Avenue Pumping Station as 28.31 MGD.
Subsequent to preparation of the Master PlariM, various revisions to land-use have surfaced.
Planned sewage flows from a recently identified Bolas Chlca development have been reduced to
below those estimated in the Master Plan and as reported by Boyle Engineering Corporation in
their October 24. 1989 letter as follows:
all or a portion of proposed flow from the Bolas Chica Development
could be introduced into the CSDOC system anywhere along Los Palos or
Slater Avenue after master planned sewer improvements for Wainer Ave,
Hell Ave. Goldenwest Street and Slater Pump Station/Force Main have
been made..:'
This change is expected to reduce District No. 11 contribution to the Slater Avenue System by
0.94 MGD (average).
The Master Plan accounts for 1.61 MGD (average)from District No. 3 that flows north to Slater
Avenue/Golden West. In a recent report prepared by WNdan and Associates(3), a part of
District No. 3 was considered for service arra exchange with District No. 11. This exchange Will
not take place. However, in review of the topography of the area in question, it appears that
600 acres of the total area evaluated will flow to the Slater Avenue System. Considering
medium density development and the unit flow generator from the Master Plan, the total
projected flow from District No. 3 is 2.33 MGD (average). Therefore, an additional 0.72 MGD
(average) of District No. 3 flow must be accounted for.
Other minor revisions include development of a parcel along Golden west Street in District
No. 11 that was previously open space. There appears to be the potential for reconnecting a
shopping center in District No. 3 that now flows into the Slater Avenue System to the District 3
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System. This should be considered during final design to reduce
pumping requirements.
At this point in development, it would appear that the total flows from the Master Plan are
.. consistent for this report and that 28.3 MGD Is a satisfactory design flow for the Slater Avenue
Pumping Station.
(1) CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineers
(3) Willdan Report-Study and Recommendations for Exchange of Service Areas Between
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11.
3-3
However, the relative District No. 3/District No. 11 contributions appear to be different, with
District No. 3's share increasing.
Flow Diversion
The Master Plan (Volume 4, Part 1. Page 11-1)(1) concludes that "...5.4 MGD (average) or 27
percent of the now from the District No. 11 Slater Avenue system must be diverted to the
Miller-Holder Trunk at Nichols Avenue (Street) in order to offset use of the Knott Interceptor by
District No. 3 to avert deficiencies throughout the entirety of the Miller-Holder Trunk north of
Hazard Avenue. This Master Plan action to switch flow routing will save millions of dollars on
improvements in District No. 3.- (sic)
As shown in the computer printouts reproduced as Appendix B. the Master P1an(1) system
analysis shows 5.4 MGD (average flow) subtracted from the Slater Avenue Trunk sewer at
Nichols Street, transported north, and added to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at Warner
Avenue and Nichols Street.
The Master Plan and this report compare that subtraction described above to one at Slater
Avenue and Magnolia Street. In this scenario, the 5.4 MGD (average) would continue to flow
s along Slater Avenue to the Knott Interceptor. At that point, the flow would be diverted to the
Miller-Holder Trunk. The invert of the Knott Interceptor Is above the Miller-Holder Trunk
Sewer as they cross at the Slater Avenue/Magnolia Street intersection.
District No. 11 Deficiencies
In addition to the overloaded sewers, the Master Plan mentions that the Golden West Trunk
Sewer Is in a very deteriorated state and requires more capacity. Much of the deterioration Is
due to poor soil conditions and resulting settling. This affects Its capacity and ability to be
cleaned and maintained.
_ Recent short-term metering of the Golden West Trunk Sewer south of Warner Avenue showed
that the maximum flow exceeds its design capacity. Routine surcharging of this pipe is
reported by CSDOC maintenance personnel.
Minor rehabilitation will also be required on the Nichols Street Gravity Sewer before the
mid-1990s. Recent televising shows the sewer to be in good condition, but the manholes will
need flow-line repairs.
Recent analysis of Slater Avenue Pump Station, based on pump running times. Indicated that
Its capacity has almost been reached.
(1) CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineer
3-4
3.5 DISCUSSION OF ALTERNATIVES
General
This part of the study is concerned with the Bows Into the Slater Avenue Pump Station and
those from it. The capacity of the Slater-Springdale-Golden West sewerage to the pump station
was found deficient in the Master Plan(l). This report addresses remedies for those sewers.
The Slater Avenue system from the pumping station was found deficient in capacity, and in
addition, 5.4 MGD (average Bow)must be diverted from it. While the Master Plan(l) proposes a
general solutlon,this report analyzes more detailed alternatives to those solutions.
.. In regard to Bows to or from the pumping station, most alternatives Involve either a parallel
relief sewer or replacement of an existing smaller sewer with a larger one along the same
alignment. Advantages of the parallel sewer construction Include the use of the same
connections that are used now Instead of disconnecting and reconnecting all tributary pipes.
Parallel sewerage construction would provide continuity of Bow even if one pipe failed to
function. During construction of a parallel sewer there is no need to pump around the section
of sewer being relieved, it can continue to flow without interruption.
If the same route is used. and the smaller pipe is replaced with a larger pipe, the chance of
conflicting with parallel or crossing pipes is reduced. With one pipe, maintenance
responsibilities are half that with two pipes and access is easier. One larger pipe can
sometimes achieve a higher capacity and a higher velocity with the same slope than two
smaller pipes at the same slope and the number of manholes required Is cut in half. Also.
possible Inflow and Infiltration are less, since fewer pipe Joints are Involved.
Pipe size selection for sewers tributary to the Slater Avenue Pump Station is based on a velocity
.. of 2 feet per second. Bowing three-quarters full (D/d =0.75). This Is possible since Inverts of
downstream pipes can be met and because it is desirable to reduce construction costs and
pumping costs. Deep pipe excavation and high power costs must be mtrifni ed. Pipe size
r selection for sewers Bowing from the pump station is based on the smallest diameter pipe that
will fill the Bow deficiency at the slope of the deficient pipe. More precise hydraulic design will
be made during the design phase to follow.
r I1) CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineer
3-5
3.6 SEWERAGE TO THE PUMPING STATION
Springdale - Slater
Existing
r Figure 3.1 shows both the Slater-Springdale Trunk Sewer(No. 1) and the Slater-Springdale
Relief Sewer(No. 2)between Edinger Avenue and Slater Avenue. To avoid two siphons under
the flood control channel, the two flows were combined into the Relief Sewer. Both sewers
remain south of the channel, and they are reconnected there to take advantage of their total
capacity. Plans show them connected at Warner Avenue and at Slater Avenue, but the Master
Plan(l) does not consider the Trunk Sewer capacity south of the flood control channel. This
report takes into account full capacity to both sewers.
Capacities of each of the sewers and the total system are shown by reach In Figure 3-1. These
are compared to projected flows In the last three columns. The data shows that there is a
` maximum deficiency of about 6.55 MOD at the flood control channel. There are also capacity
deficiencies throughout most of this system all the way south to Slater Avenue and east to
Golden West Street.
r Alternative Routing
To relieve these deficiencies, various alternatives based on Master Plan(l) flows are possible
` including the following:
Alt. 1. Installing a new interceptor on Heil Avenue from Springdale Street east to Golden
West Street. It would join a new Golden West Trunk Sewer at that point.
Alt. 2. Removing the 36-inch existing Relief Sewer along Springdale Avenue (Trunk No. 2)
` and replacing It with a new 60-Inch pipe from Heil Avenue to Slater Avenue and
east to Golden West Street.
Alt. 3. Installing a new 57-inch sewer parallel to the existing 36-inch Relief Sewer (Trunk
No. 2). The Trunk Sewer (No. 1) would be abandoned In place.
r
The main advantage of the Hell Avenue Interceptor Alternative 1. is Its length lone mLLe),
compared to the 2-mile length for Alternatives 2 and 3. There is room in Hell Avenue to
construct the Interceptor. It would be more difficult to construct a pipe In Springdale Avenue
because of the two existing ones.
The need to Improve the capacity of the Golden West Street sewerage adds to the advantages of
the Heil Avenue interceptor since one new pipe in Heil Avenue and in Golden West Street can
relieve capacity problems In both the Springdale-Slater System and the Golden West Trunk
Sewer as well as eliminate the failing condition of the Golden West Trunk Sewer. By
Inspection, the cost of Alternative 1 Is the least of the three routes.
11) CSDOC Master Plan - 1969 by Ca:ollo-Boyle Engineer
3.6
r 4 M" CNPIIO V TOTAL MAXOW RO. MA%W. TOTAL EXCESS
F
I1 02 WACKY I1 I2 FLOW FLOW
EOINOER (um IN= IYOM IYOOI IMOW IYOtl
660 ;AVENUE
_ s
m: sAB 9.12 7.60 Toss 1.33
Q; 3.23 3.05
W•
856 W LL� B.m 9.12 ].{0 10.45 1.03
W W_.
r HID! AVENUE
W.-�%
6
J0, too 4.07 6.86 4.30 7.40 11.70 0.68
_ 656 IS
O• 630
2•
m� 5.33 7.05 12.38 4.30 7A0 1L7o 4.94
r F
C 626
� 4.13
654 J•
_ N IS 5.33 2.24 7.57 4.41 7.40 11.81 4.24
91 82 . 4.65 4.85 11.20 11.20 6.55 LAN
D.C. ROOD CES CONTROL:`AI!ME 624 • 4.65 7.25• - 1120 11.2 3.85
r ~NM AVENUE 2.800 2.83 5.43• ^ 11.38 11. 5.95@
82 H
W • O
`J
O
O • W
0 4.000 10.77 14.77• 0 10.63 18.36 3.88
s
m �
•
surER AVENUE I¢II
r i
m
e20 ®THE TO MASTER PLAN SHOUTS DECREASED FLAW POSSIBLY
TO�m DUE LOWER PEAKING FACTOR
r
r
1. ®MAN HOLE NUMBER
7. ALL 9INFORMATION SHOWN IN THE FROM THE 1990 MASTER PUN.EXCEPT
VE TA%E EXISTING
VALUES INDICATED BY•;THESE VALUES ARE CSDOC SEWERS
CALCULATED FROM CSDOC A9BUILT PLANS.
3. THE IBM MASTER PLAN DOES NOT RECOGNIZE SPRINGDALE STREET
THE CAPACrIXOF SEWER SYSTEM s I FIGURE 3-1
SOUTH OF 620 NOR ANY FUTURE FLOWS IN IT. SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
3-7
All moiNG Flows
Based on flows tabulated in Figure 3-1, alternatives for the extent of diversion are as follows:
.. Alt. A. Intercept the maximum excess flow of 6.55 MGD from both the Slater-Springdale
Relief Sewer and the Slater-Springdale Trunk Sewer at Heil Avenue. This would
reduce most of the flows in those two sewers to their capacity all the way south to
Slater Avenue and east to Golden West Street. As shown in Figure 3-2, only the
684 foot length of Slater-Springdale Relief Sewer east of Mayor Lane would be
under capacity. This sewer between MH610 and MH612 was designed with an
adequate slope but was built with a flatter slope than designed. Should
maintenance of this length of sewer be a problem, 1320 feet of new 36-inch relief
sewer could be installed at a steeper slope.
Alt. B. At Heil Avenue intercept all the flows in both the Slater-Springdale Relief Trunk
Sewer(7.40 MGD) and In the Slater-Springdale Trunk Sewer (3.05 MGD) at Heil
Avenue for a total of 10.45 MGD. This alternative would remove all flow from both
the 27-inch relief trunk and the 24-Inch trunk and muse the problems of odor and
septic conditions associated with low velocities in the sewage pipes to the south.
r Alt. C. Intercept all the flow at Heil Avenue and constructing new northbound sewers from
the Flood Control Channel to Heil Avenue. This would have the advantages of
eliminating the siphon, lowering the downstream flow as much as possible. and
providing the maximum capacity south of the siphon but would cause odor
problems there.
Recommendations
Alternative 1. the Heil Avenue Interceptor, is recommended to solve the major capacity
deficiency problems. Diversion of 6.55 MGD, Alt. A. is recommended to provide the minimum
relief while maintaining the adequate capacity in the system except for one Inadequate length.
The diversion facility should be designed as a peak shaving device to permit passage of enough
flow to maintain flushing velocities in the siphon under the flood control channel but to divert
excess flows eastward In the above recommended Heil Avenue Interceptor.
r Proposed Heil Avenue Interceptor
Existing
There Is no existing District sewer on Heil Avenue.
3-8
r
1 1 ( 1 l I e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l [
SLATER-
SPRINGDALE SLATER AVENUE
TRUNK
SEWER a 27'0 _ 2T0 2T0 IIIIIIIIIL- IS8TS1
5-0.0007 •0.0008 - '
SLATER-SPRINGDALE1 38. 0 38. 0 6 38' 0p 36' 1D
dwww www wwf� www www www�ww ISSRSI
RELIEF SEWER ,-�s-o.00069 s-o.00075 s-o.00teo s-o.00tto o.000a/ 6-o.00tox \
�n z w
m
w
J
c 620 61B c 818 61d -a+ 612 610 ;� BOe
o a zw
w
3 i 9
w w � o
3967 L.F 881 LF. &
D/d-.75 1 D/d-.92 1 D/d-.76
SSRS CAPACITY FROM M.P. 10.26 10.77 1e.71 19.01 9.70 12.67
m SSTS CAPACITY M.P. MASTER PLAN
FROM PLANS MANHOLE
e.84 6.97 6.8/ O
TOTAL CAPACITY MANHOLE
SSRS&SSTs 15.54 18.06 20.35 18.88 18.07 18.21
TOTAL FLOW 19.82 19.82 19.82 23.62 23.62 23.81
-FROM M.P.
UNDER CAPACITY 4.28 3.76 - 4.94 7.55 5.60
FLOW DIVERTED 6.65 6.55 6.56 6.55 6.55 6.55
H EIL
UNDER CAPACITY 0 0 0 0 1.0 0
W/FLOW DIVERTED
EXCESS CAPACITY 2.27 z.79 7.08 1.61 - o.9s
FLOWS IN MGD EXISTING CSDOC SEWERS
SLATER AVENUE
FIGURE 3-2
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
Fl COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
JV'Ij/W_4 OF ORANGE COUNTY
Altemattves
The alternatives for the pipe size and capacities on Hell Avenue are shown In Tables 3-1 and
3-2 for a minimum slope and scouring velocity.
As shown in Appendix A. the design is complicated by two large stone drams crossing Heil
Avenue at Trudy Lane. They force the proposed sewer down to a lower elevation all the way to
the pumping station. The interceptor from Hell Avenue to Trudy Lane could be either a
36-inch diameter pipe at a moderate slope and velocity or a 42-inch or 48-inch diameter pipe.
.. Recommendaflons
The recommended pipe sizes on Heil Avenue are a 27-Inch pipe east to Trudy Lane and a
36-inch pipe from there to Golden West Street. Special pipe bedding techniques may be
required along Heil Avenue Just east of Springdale Avenue due to reported poor soil conditions.
After subsurface investigations, pipe supports can be designed and estimated.
The diversion structure will provide flexibility to allow yearly adjustment of the eastward bound
diverted flows to Heil Avenue to permit scouring flows to flow southward in the Springdale
Avenue pipes and siphon, but to avoid surcharging them.
Golden West meet
Existing
d According to the Master Plan(l). the 12-inch sewer north of Heil Avenue has adequate capacity.
The Plan(l) reports that the existing 15-inch diameter Golden West Trunk Sewer from Heil
Avenue south to Slater Avenue will be overloaded at the design flows. Also, the sewer has
deteriorated as previously discussed. The addition of 6.55 MGD from Springdale Avenue at
Heil Avenue together with the 2.76 MGD forecast from the north will require increasing the
capacity of that sewer from 0.89 MGD to about 9.5 MGD.
The further addition of 0.4 MGD at Wainer Avenue will require increasing the capacity south of
,r Wainer Avenue to about 10 MGD.
Atiernatives
This overloading can be corrected by either of the following alternatives:
1. Installing a parallel relief sewer
2. Removing the existing sewer and replacing It with a larger pipe-
3-10
TABLE 3-1
ALTERNATIVE PIPE SIZES
TO CARRY 6.55 MGD
Velocity
Pipe Diameter Slope feet/minute
hashes (3) (2)
21 .005 5.28
_ 24 .0024 4.00
27 .0013 3.19
30 .00074 2.58
36 .00035 Say 2.0
TARIX 3-2
ALTERNATIVE PrPE CAPAcrrms AT mumsum SLOPE(')
Maximum
Minimum Flow Rate
Pipe Diameter Slope MGD
itches (2) (3)
27 .0005 4.06
30 .000" 5.07
33 .00039 6.13
36 .00035 7.31
,r 42 .00028 9.85
48 .00024 13.11
(1) D/d= .75.velocity=2 fps
Manning N=0.013
r (2) V = 1.486 R2/3 51/2
n
for D of.75 R= .302 d
.r d
(3) Q = K D8/3 51/2 x .646 MGD
n cIs
for D of.75 K= .91
a
3-11
s
The advantages of each option are listed earlier in Section 3.5 of this report.
The alternatives for the pipe size, and flow rate are shown in Table 3-1 for minimum slope and
scouring velocity.
Recommendation
Since there are few connections to the existing 15-inch pipe and its capacity is so low
compared to the need. it is recommended that the existing pipe be removed and in its place a
42-inch diameter pipe be installed.
Pumpina Station Influent
Existing
The 33-inch diameter Slater Avenue Pump Station influent pipe between Golden West Street
and the pumping station will be severely overloaded by predicted flows of 28.31 MGD since the
present capacity is reported to be 15.29 MGD. The predicted overload will be about 13 MGD.
AltemaHves
The projected overloading can be eliminated by either of the following alternatives:
Alt. 1. Install a parallel relief sewer and balance the flows between the two pipes.
d Alt. 2. Remove the existing 33-inch diameter sewer and replace it with a sewer at a flatter
slope.
As shown in Tables 3-3 and 3-4. a new pipe carrying the total flow not more than 75 percent
full at mlmmum slope would need to be at least 60-inch diameter while a parallel relief sewer
could be 42-inch diameter at greater than minimum slope.
Regardless of the alternative chosen. special pipe foundation design may be required on Slater
d Avenue north of Lake Talbert because of reported poor sod conditions.
Recommendations
Since the existing sewer has over half the capacity needed for the future. it Is recommended
that It remain in place and that a new 42-inch diameter parallel sewer be constructed between
-� Golden West Street and the existing manhole on Slater Avenue about 150 feet west of the
evl Ctntg pumping station. From that manhole. both the existing 33-inch diameter and the new
42-inch diameter pipes join to a 72-inch diameter new sewer to the new pumping station.
3-12
TABLE 3-3
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
r INPLIIENT SEWER REPLACEMENT
FLOW-28.3I.IIGD(I)
Pipe Diameter Slope Velocity
inches feet/foot(3) feet/second(2)
r 36 .0122 11.8
42 .0054 8.7
r 48 .0026 6.6
54 .0014 5.3
r 60 .00081 4.3
72 .00031 3.0
r D/d= .75
(1) Equatlon 1
(2) Equation 2
TABLE 3-4
PARALLEL R
r FLOW- IS I
Pipe
r diameter Slope Velocity
inches feet/foot(3) feet/second(2)
r 24 .0094 7.9
27 .005 6.2
r 30 .0029 5.1
33 .0017 4.1
r 36 .001 3.4
42 .00048 2.6
48 .00024 2.00
r
(1) D/d= .75
r (2) V = 1.486 R2/3 Sl/2
n
r for D of.75 R= .302 d
d
(3) Q = K De,J SI/2 x .646 MGD
n cis
r for D of.75 K= .91
a
3-13
r
3.7 SEWERAGE FROM THE PUMPING STATION
General
,y As previously stated, the goals of the piping east of the pumping station are twofold:
1. To carry the anticipated flow rates in a fume main and gravity sewers:
2. To divert 5.4 MGD (average flow) from the Knott system to the Miller-Holder system.
The 5.4 MGD of average flow is equivalent to 7.0 MGD at maximum flow(').
w
There are many possible combinations of force mains and sewer improvements that can effect
these two goals. Force main options include pumping to Gothard Street or to Nichols Street.
Gravity sewer options include parallel sewers or replacement sewers. Flows may be diverted at
Nichols Street. at Magnolia Street or at both locations. All the elements must be considered
together in each of the options as shown.but first each of the elements must be understood by
themselves.
Slater Avenue Pumping Station Force Main
Existing
' At this time, the Slater Avenue Pump Station can pump into either or both of two 24-inch
diameter force mains (depending on valve positions on the pumping manifold) to Gothard
Street where Diversion Structure No. 28 connects to two parallel gravity sewers discussed later
in this Section.
The newer 24-inch diameter force main was installed in 1981-82 and is south of the older
24-inch diameter force main.
According to direction front the District:
'The newer of the two existing force mains and gravity sewers between
the pump station and Nichols Street shall be considered as future
standby. The older existing force main and gravity sewer may be
abandoned In place or removed and disposed of in accordance with
District policy where the new force main and/or gravity sewer are to be
installed in the same alignment."
Alternatives
With a predicted maximum flow rate of 28.31 MGD and the above quoted direction, the
alternatives for force main length are as follows:
r
3-14
Alt. 1 Install a new 36-inch force main to Nichols Street
Alt. 2 Install a new force main to Gothard Street and a new gravity sewer to Nichols Street.
.� Pumping through a new 36-Inch diameter from the pump station all the way to Nichols Street
would leave an existing 30-Inch diameter Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer carrying only the flow
from 480 feet of 8-inch diameter City of Huntington Beach Sewer. These small flows will not
flush the 30-inch diameter sewer and will cause odor problems.
As shown in Table 3-5. and Appendix A. extending the force main below Slater Avenue past the
high point at Gothard Street all the way to Nichols Street would add about 1,330 mom feet of
force mam for a total of about 2,300 feet. Force main size alternatives am shown In Table 3-6.
Connecting to the existing gravity sewer at elevation 20 at Nichols Street would save pumping a
vertical distance of 5 feet to pump to elevation 25 at Gothard Street.
As shown In Table 3-7. annualized construction costs for the tome main and for the force ream
and gravity sewer with manholes are comparable.but pumping costs over a 20-year period for
the long fore main are almost$4.300 a year less.
Recoffmmndaffom
It Is recommended that a force main be constructed to carry the Slater Avenue Pump Station
effluent to Gothard Street. The recommended diameter of the force main is 36-inches.
r Slater Avenue From Gothwd Street to Nichols Sheet
Existing
Flows from adjacent buildings contribute to the sewers in this area
r Between the east end of the force main at Gothard Street and the Southern Pacific
Transportation Company(SPTC) railroad spur, there are two 30-inch pipes. One is the Slater
Avenue Gravity Sewer (Contract 11-10.11. The other is the Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer
r (Contract 11-10-2). Each has a slope of 0.004 and a capacity of 12.9 MOD with D/d of.75.
Under the SPEC.the older(1966) 30-mch VCP has a slope of 0.028 and a capacity of 35 MGD
.. at D/d= .75. The newer(1973) 30-inch VCP has a slope of 0.004 and a capacity of 12.9 MGD
at D/d= .75.
Between SPTC and Nichols Street. the older 30-Inch VCP has a slope of.0039 and a capacity of
12.8 MGD at D/d of 0.75. The newer 30-Inch VCP has a slope of 0.004 (not 0.008 as reported
In the Master Plant 1)) and a capacity of 12.9 MGD at D/d of.75,
Ill CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Camllo-Boyle Engineer
3-15
TABLE 3-8
FORCE MAIN HYDRAULICS
FOR ECONOMIC COMPARISON ONLY(l)
Force Pump Total
Main Center F.M. Static Pipe Dynamic
Length Line Invert Lift Losses Head
Alt. ft. Elev. Elev. ft. ft. ft.
r
1 Face Main to 2300 -22 20 42 5 47
r, Nichols St.
2 Force Main to 1000 -22 25 47 2 49
Gothard St.
and Gravity
Sewer to Nichols
Street
ti
(1) Power Cost = Q x h x .746 x $0.06 x 365
3960 x .7
W
9 = average flow of 14.000 gpm
TABLE 3-6
FORCE MAIN PIPE SIZE ALTERNATIVES
Force Main Velocity
diameter feet/
inches second
r 30 9.08
36 6.30
42 4.63
d
3-16
TABLE 3-7
FORCE MAIN COMPARISON
ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST
Annual
Pumping Construction Costs(1) Annualized Total
Ene Gravity Force Sub Construction Annual
All. Cost Sewer Main Total Costl31 Cost
1 36"Fone main from pump $93.035 $751.000 $751,000 $76.527 $169,562
station to Nichols St., (2300 Lf)
2 36"Forrc main from pump $96.991 $244.800)4)
slallon to Gothard St.. 11000 L0
w and $754.200 $76.853 $173,844
36"Gravity sewer from $509 400(4)
Gothard St. to Nichols SL, 1300 Lf
Based on:
I. Master Plan construction costs adjusted to project conditions
2. 60 per KW-hr.
3. 20-year, 8 percent interest rate
4. Al a shallower depth
Except for the short railroad crossing, the combined capacity of the two 30-inch diameter
gravity sewers between Gothard Street and Nichols Street is insufttctent to carry the flows from
the proposed pump station. In the previous section, It was recommended that a new 36-inch
diameter sewer perform that function and serve the adjacent tributary sewers as well.
u Diversion Structure
Diverting 5.4 MGD (average flow) from the Slater Avenue Trunk Extension to the Nichols Street
Gravity Sewer will require a structure capable of reasonably constant diversion of that flow
northward while permitting the remaining flow from the Slater Avenue Pump Station to
.w continue eastward in the Slater Avenue Sewers. This can be achieved by Installing stop logs of
adjustable height and depth to partially data the eastward Slater Avenue flow and divert a
limited flow northward up Nichols Street. The northward flow will go under one set of stop logs
s and the eastward flow will go over another set of logs. Since this diversion has financial
Implications, the adjustment of the diversion should be made initially and checked and the
diversion should be checked routinely (about every year) to ensure reasonable accuracy.
ry Routine maintenance should be provided by CSDOC commensurate with the number of
problems found in the operation of this diversion structure.
V Slater Avenue From Nichols Sheet to Newland Sheet
Nichols Street to West of Koledo Lane
w
Between Nichols Street and the manhole 68 feet west of Koledo Lane, the existing 36-inch
Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension (SATSE) at a slope of .01030 has a capacity of
.. 39.89 MGD(1) at D/d = .75. The maximum flow will be 21.31 MGD(1) since 7.0 MGD
maximum flow (5.4 MGD average flow) is diverted from 28.31 MGD. No improvement is
necessary.
West of Koledo Lone to Beach Boulevard
From Manhole No. 600 west of Koledo Lane east to Beach Boulevard, the existing 42-inch
SATSE at a slope of .00074 has a capacity of 14.3 MGD(I) at D/d of .75. With diversion of
5.4 MGD (average flow) at Nichols Street. the maximum flow will be 21.31 MGD(1).
The alternative solutions to the 7 MGD deficiency are shown in Table 3-8. Paralleling the
42-Inch SATSE with 1200 feet of 33-Inch SATSE, the recommended alternative, would cost
about $561.600. Replacing the 42-Inch sewer with 1200 feet of 48-Inch sewer would cost
about 5840.000.
r
(1) CSDOC Master Plan - 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineer
d
3-18
TABLE 3-8
CONBTRucITON cons or ALTERNATIVE niuwvlsmmm To SEWERSM
ON SLATER AVENUE BETWEEN NICHOLS STREET AND MAGNOLIA STREET
Without Diversion of With Diversion of
5.4 MGD(avg. flow)0 Nichols St. 5.4 MGD (avg.flow) 0 Nichols
St.
Parallel
Facility Sewer(3) Seweri"r S Parallel) R Sewe,(3
a
Nichols Street (5) (5) (5) (5)
Nichols Street to
West of Koledo Lane (5) (5) (5) (5)
West of Koledo Lane
to Beach Boulevard $ 728.400 $ 949.200 $ 561.600(2) $ 840,000
er
Beach Boulevard to
Newland Street $1.609.000 $2.096.000 $1.362.100(2) $2.096.150
R
Newland Street to
Magnolia Street $1.010.000 N/A(4) 0(2) 0
(Knott Interceptor)
Diversion
Structure $ 350.000 •- $ 91.000(2) --
0 Magnolia Street ® Nichols Street
(1) EPA LA Index of 312
(2) Recommended Alternative
(3) Parallel and replacement sewers at D/d=0.75
(4) Not considered because of replacement pipe size
(5) No improvement required
r 3.19
Without diversion of 5.4 MOD (average flow) at Nichols Street. the maximum flow will be
s 26.7 MOD. Paralleling the 42-inch SATSE with 1200 feet of 33-inch sewer would cost about
$561.600. Replacing the 42-inch SATSE with 1200 feet of 54-inch sewer would cost about
$949.200.
Beach Boulevard to Newland Sheet
s From Beach Boulevard east to Newland Street. the existing 42-inch SATSE at a slope of
0.00074 has a capacity of 14.3 MOD(I) at D/d of.75. With diversion of 5.4 MOD (average flow)
at Nichols Street,the maatmum flow will be 23.56 MGDII) and alternative solutions(1) and(2)
e' am considered:
(1) Paralleling the 42-Inch SATSE with 2650 feet of 36-inch relief sewer, the
recommended solution would cost about$1.362.100.
(2) Replacing the 42-inch SATSE with 2650 feet of 54-inch sewer would cost about
$2.096,150.
Costs of these alternatives are shown in Table 3-5.
Without diversion of 5.4 MOD (average flow) at Nichols Street the maximum flow will be
30.56 MOD and alternative solutions(3)and(4) are considered:
uU
(3) Paralleling the 42-inch SATSE with 2650 feet of 42-inch sewer would cost about
r $1,609,000.
(4) Replacing the 42-Inch SATSE with 2650 feet of 54-inch pipe would cost about
.r $2.096.000.
Shier Avenue atom Newland Sheet to Maanolla Sheaf
The Knott Interceptor carries sewage from Newland Street to Magnolia Street. On Slater
Avenue.It Is 96 inches in diameter, has a slope of.0046 and a capacity of 136.53 MGD(I).
With diversion of 5.4 MOD (average flow) at Nichols Street, the future flows will be
133.89 MGD(I) and no improvement will be needed. This Is the recommended solution shown
s In Table 3-5.
Without diversion of 5.4 MOD (average flow) at Nichols Street. the future flows will be
139.29 MOD and alternative solutions (1) and (2) are considered.
(1) It would require a D/d of.95 to provide the capacity for anticipated flows.
(1) CSDOC Master Plan- 1989 by Camflo-Boyle Engineer
3-20
r
(2) Paralleling the 96-inch trunk with 2400 feet of 30-Inch sewer would cost about
$1,010,000.
Summary
As shown in Table 3-5. It 1s recommended that the 5.4 MGD (average flow) be diverted to the
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at Nichols Street and that a parallel sewer be constructed between
s Beach Boulevard and Newland Street and that a parallel sewer be constructed west from Beach
Boulevard to Manhole No. 600 which Is 68 feet west of Koledo Lane. No gravity sewer
Improvements are recommended on Slater Avenue between the Slater Avenue Pumping Station
s and Manhole No. 600 nor are any recommended east of Newland Street.
Nichols Sheet
Exi Hng
t+ - The existing Nichols Street sewer flowing from south to north from Slater Avenue to Warner
Avenue, has the characteristics shown in Table 3-9. This table also shows existing side
connections to the pipe.
As previously stated in this Chapter. It has been reported that the sewer was in need of repair,
but based on recent televising, only manhole flow lines are in need of rehabilitation.
w
CSDOC will permit this sewer to operate at D/d of.92.
` Recommendations
It Is recommended that the manhole Bow lines be rehabilitated as part of routine District
maintenance. Since the existing sewer will carry a maximum flow of 7.0 MGD at D/d of .92,
there is no deficiency and no need for major construction.
r
3.8 SUMMARY
The recommended solutions to carry predicted future maximum flows are shown in Figure 3-3.
ti
3.9 UTILITY SEARCH
The utility search activities Involved in this study included the following:
1. Surveying existing utility and street improvement plans to locate previously plotted
.� underground facilities.
r
3-21
TABLE 3-9
s CAPACIT4 OF EXISTING 24-INCH
NICHOLS STREET GRAVITY SEWER,
Length of Capacity at D/d oft')
Reach Slope .75 .80 .85 .92 1_0
feet feet/foot K=.91 I(Z,82 K=.74 K=.62 K=.46
~ MGD(1)
Slater Ave. Less than 5.4 MGD More than 5.4 MGD
South End average flow and 7.0 average flow and 7.0
MGD ma damn flow MGD maximum flow
663 0.0021 6.1 6.5 6.9 7.2 6.7
w •• i
300 0.0028 7.03 7.5 7.9 8.3 7.7
V •
350 0.0026 6.78 7.3 7.6 8.0 7.4
w •and•
650 0.0061 10.4 11.1 11.7 12.2 11.4
e" 635 0.0057 10.0 10.8 11.3 11.8 I1.0
North End
Warner Ave.
Denotes 12-inch sewer connection on west side of manhole
•• Denotes east and west 12-Inch stubs constructed at manholes in 1966.
es
(1) g = K Ds/e St/2 x .646 MGD
n fs
for D of.75 K= .91
a
3-22
m ' E
21• 13.23 13.05 27' 6.19
z z
'z
'm 2 0 114 1/2 MILE
1LL APPROXIMATE SCALE
W W w
3 w
;5 y �
z
24• 11.89 14.30 ' 27' 1 4.97
cc
RELIEVE WITH HEIL F- ' RELIEVE WITH
AVE RELIEF SEWER ' RELIEF SEA
' 98' 1114.911121.59
2
24'&36' ].25 F 1 60' 161.21 150.91
RELIEVE W/HE w
RELIEF SEV '-
62 , m
/ER
W ,J 2836 5.43 '
J aAE1.lEYE WITI 128 1 2 126
IIZ RELIEFS 114.87 '_ 72• 161J31 51.73 '
62 224'836' 14.]7 21R ** � '
a 77y�C�_RELIEVE W/ 1 < 1- O
RELIEF SE' 3 IF z
W Q RELIEVE W/ 'Y
•� RELIEF SE '
w VSLATER-SF 2 124 ' ,��
s Im. ►���i�i��OB)
SLATER
1S AVE
3 98' 1136.531133.89 �1
138'
2T836' 1 '1
RELIEVI
INTE '\
zra36116.54119.62 y
RELIEVE /W HEIL AVE
INTERCEPTOR SLATER AVE. PUMP STATION
0
0
a
COLLECTION SYSTEM
RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS
a FIGURE 3-3
c
3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
!3
w
..r
2. Contacting the Underground Service Alert to secure their list of all underground
av utility owners in the area.
3. Personally meeting with the major utility owners at their offices and securing hard
r copies of their utility plans for the streets involved.
4. Requesting and securing hard copies of plans from owners of relatively minor
e. utilities.
5. Organizing and indexing all the plans.
6. Plotting all the above information on plan, profile.and moss-section sheets.
7. Field checking the plans with a visual inspection of the streets for which
improvements were considered.
"• S. Sending plans and praflles to major utility owners for their checking and cornment•
9. Making corrections suggested by the major utility owners.
10. Providing written certification of the on-site inspection of the utilities.
11. Documenting the above material.
The results of the utility search are shown in the Appendices as follows:
Material Appendix
•+ Plans. profiles and cross-sections A
Utility certification letter C
r
List of utilities contacted and D
Index to plans in JCE files
r
3.10 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
Traffic control and detour plans will be based on the manual of Traffic Controls for
ronstructlon and Maintenance Work Zones. Chapter 5 of CALTRANS Traffic Manual (1985
w
Revision) with specific application to the project based on engineering judgement for the
particular conditions along the highways involved. Additional City requirements will also have
to be met The estimated cost of the project has been factored up to include traffic control.
r
Traffic control should maintain safe and reasonable access to the commercial properties along
the route to prevent hardship to the proprietors.
r
3.24
Because of the high volumes of traffic on Golden West Street. Slater Avenue and Beach
.,v Boulevard, hours of construction on these highways should be limited to between 9:00 A.M.
and 3:30 P.M.
e The City of Huntington Beach will require that construction along Golden West Street and
around Beach Boulevard must be limited to avoid impact on traffic to and from the Pacific
Ocean beaches on summer weekends.
w
The excavations for all of the trenches will be sheeted or shielded to maintain the open trench
without excessive excavation required for laid-back trench sides. Concrete barriers should be
used to deter vehicles from entering the zone of constriction outside the sheeting.
Manhole construction will require widened sheeted trenches and narrowed through highway
lanes.
Along Golden West Street where the trench will be in the middle of the 6-lane road, the City of
Huntington Beach will not permit closing of more than 2 lanes of traffic. In addition to other
traffic control procedures recommended by CALTRANS and adopted by the City, arrow boards
and Type II barricades must be employed and the City noise ordinance must be followed.
Along parts of Slater Avenue, new sewer construction will involve both shallow and deep cut for
the force main and medium deep cut for the gravity sewer. The routes for these pipes will be
on either side of the road center line and in some places the routes crass the street from one
side to the other.
According to Mr. Bruce Gilmer.Traffic Engineer, the City of Huntington Beach is in the process
of Improving Warner Avenue. Therefore, boring and Jacking under the new paving at Golden
West Street should be considered.
Because of the general improvement to Warner Avenue, it is felt that some of the present Slater
Avenue drivers will move to Warner Avenue. somewhat relieving potential constructlon
problems on Slater Avenue.
3.11 STREET RECONSTRUCTION
.r CSDOC are committed to rehabilitating the existing roads and utilities to equal or better
condition than before construction. Generally, streets will be repaved from curb to curb with
paving systems meeting City standards and CSDOC Standard Specifications.
w
According to Mr. Tony Folaron. Civil Engineering Assistant, the City of Huntington Beach plans
to add some center dividers and about 1-1/2 inches of asphalt concrete to the top of the
Golden West Street pavement from curb to curb. The project plans include the length of
Golden West Street from the Pacific Coast Highway to Warner Avenue but since the length
between Slater Avenue and Warner Avenue is in relatively good condition and project funding
3-25
may not permit repaving the entire length, the length of the proposed 42-Inch sewer
�.. recommended herem may not be included in the City's repaving project. Another reason for
not including that length in the paving project is the tiring involved. The City plans to pave in
Spring 1990 and good planning would preclude removing and replacing the new pavement for
sewer construction within the following year.
Present City repaving plans show about 1000 feet of center divider proposed just north of
c, Slater Avenue. if the length of Golden West Street from Slater Avenue to Warner Avenue is not
repaved by the City, the Districts should consider construction of the divider and curb-tocurb
pavement as part of their sewer Improvement project. Communication between the Districts
a and the City should continue In this regard.
CSDOC should pursue the possibility of entering into a cooperative agreement with the City of
Huntington Beach to rebuild Slater Avenue. particularly the intersection at Golden West Street.
ry
3-26
r
CHAPTER 4
Chapter 4
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION ANALYSIS
4.1 INTRODUCTION
Existing Station
a The existing underground pumping station Is located on an easement from GTE. An additional
plot has been leased from GTE for a standby generator. The site plan is shown in Figure 4-1
and a copy of the lease and the easement agreement are both in Appendix E.
r
The pumping station Is about 25 years old and the pumping capacity does not meet the
protected peak flow of 28.31 MGD. The pump station is not large enough (wet well/dry well) to
accommodate the expansion. Standby power Is provided by a "low noise" trailer-mounted
generator with auto start and transfer.
The present site layout fails to meet the District's access criteria to provide the following:
1. Easy transition from a driving lane, across the curb line and sidewalk, to a stopping
.. pad clear of the sidewalk.
2. Access to gates that open clear of the stopping pad.
r
3. Parking for more than one vehicle inside the gate and fence.
r
4. Easy exit with the same gate, stopping pad. and sidewalk requirements.
Expansion Criteria
Guidelines in considering the replacement of this station include the following:
r
1. A peak flow rate of 28.31 MGD as stated In the Master Plan with the flexibility
provided by one standby pump and proportionally large wet well so that final
,. revisions to peak flow can be accommodated.
2. New reliability criteria for pumping stations printed in the Master Plan and
r summarized in Appendix G.
3. District experience with other equipment and methods.
r
4. A desire for uniformity of equipment parts and procedures among the Districts'
pumping stations.
r
4-1
r
r SLATER AVENUE
NO SCALE 9921
x
vl
xnx A o
>�x1''w - SLATER: AVE. At1
2 1f PAa Wjk/AGE A+UMA/AG
�9 J yym yk 4 x .: STATION 33 D
A
N wli r Cac. CORO 4 (n
22' 23' al'R Qp MCNAW v`�1
LWK F6NCE l
GENERAL 7-EL6PNONE PROPEA3TY
LEASED SITE
10167
FROM: SLATER AVENUE
PUMP STATION SITE PLAN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF FIGURE 4-1
ORANGE COUNTY AND GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. TO
LEASE SITE. SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
JVtvIL�.Y OF ORANGE COUNTY
r
r
5. A 36-inch diameter effluent force main to Nichols Street as discussed in Chapter 3.
r 6. Requirements of the City of Huntington Beach.
7. Relative availability of land acquired from GTE.
8. On-site standby power generation.
4.2 PUMPS
General
Pump selection has considered a varying number of pumps, the desirable pump configuration
and rotative speed, and the possible reuse of existing units.
Among the alternatives considered are the following:
1. The number and sequencing of operating and standby pumps;
r
2. The use of existing pumps with modifications;
r 3. The use of existing motors;
4. Replacement with new pumps,motors and drives;
5. The use of pumps that are reliable, require relatively easy maintenance, and have
been used previously by the Districts.
r
Recommendations are made regarding all of the listed options.
r System Head Curve
The modified system head curve for the pumping station is shown In Figure 4-2. It is based on
a maximum flow of 28.31 MGD pumped up to Gothard Street through a 36-Inch DIP force
main. The static heads take into account the inverts of the influent interceptors and the high
point of the force main at Gothard Street as discussed in Chapter 3 and shown on the
r
preliminary profiles (Appendix A). Friction losses are based on a Hazen-Williams coefficient of
C=100, which is a conservative value for ductile iron pipe. The maximum pumping head Is
estimated at 54.0 feet at about 19.660 gallons per minute (gpml.
The modified system head curve is the friction loss in the common force main shared by pumps
r that operate in parallel. The friction losses in the suction and discharge piping of individual
pumps Is subtracted from the individual pump head-capacity curves to obtain modified pump
head-capacity curves.
4-3
65
55
LU
W
LL_
p 50
2
W
S
A
A
45
40- -
35-t-4 F I- I I
0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24600 28000 32000
GPM
MODIFIED SYSTEM HEAD CURVE
FIGURE 4-2
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Number of Pumps mid Flow Rotes
At a maximum flow rate of 28.31 MGD or 19.660 gpm, the options for the number of pumps
are as follows:
Number of Pumps Maximum Rate
Pumps of Flow per Pump
opera tirra Standby Total am
2 1 3 9830
3 1 4 6553
' 4 1 5 4915
5 1 6 3932
6 1 7 3276
A total of 3 pumps may not provide sufficient reliability, as each operating pump must be able
to handle 50 percent of the flow with one pump out of service and 100 percent of the flow with
two pumps out of service. The added reliability of 6 or 7 pumps is not Justified with respect to
pump, electrical control, and added dry well cost. A pumping station with a total of five pumps
is recommended.
Providing three variable-speed pumps and two constant-speed pumps, for a total of five pumps
would meet the reliability requirements and would be similar to the Main Street pumping
station which has two variable-speed pumps and three constant-speed pumps.
.. Existing Pumps
The five existing pumps at Slater Avenue are Fairbanks Morse (FM) Series 5400. vertical.
non-clog. dry pit pumps similar to those shown at the top of Figure 4-3. Their model, size, and
rated output are shown below. Pump curves are shown in Appendix F.
Impeller Rated
Existing Model Size Capacity TDH Speed
Pump No. No. Inches �m_ feet (RPM)
1 5415 20.75 3500 45 890
2 5415 17.25 3500 45 900
3 5415 18 3000 45 880
4 5415 18.75 3000 45 880
5 5415 18.125 3500 45 860
In review of the above tabulation, none of the existing pumps can be reused unless they are
refurbished to meet the capacity and head requirements for a ftve-pump station.
r
4-5
w
r
r
EXISTING PUMPS @SLATER AVE. P.S.
VERTICAL DRY PIT NON-CLOG PUMPS, SERIES 5410
r I
1
r
r
I I
r PUMPS INSTALLED AT MAIN STREET P.S.
-, VERTICAL DRY PIT ANGLEFLOW PUMPS SERIES 5700
FAIRBANKS-MORSE PUMPS
FIGURE 4-3
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
y 4-6
Standardization of Pump Models
r
Like most of the recently installed pumps in other CSDOC pumping stations, the existing
pumps at Slater Avenue are F-M Model Number 5415, non-clog. vertical dry pit pumps. Other
r F-M pumps recently installed at the Main Street Pumping Station are from their 5700 Series
shown in the bottom half of Figure 4-3. The latter are slightly more expenstve, but are more
efficient, more adaptable, and the series has higher capacity range than the 5400 Series.
r Series 5700 pump curves, in the range that would be applicable for the new station, are
reproduced in Appendix F.
Since there am other Series 5700 pumps in the CSDOC system, all could be applicable for this
project.
Alternatives for the New Station
The alternatives for choosing the five pumps include the use of new or existing pumps and, in
r the case of new pumps, use of Series 5400 or 5700 models. Selected alternatives are listed
below.
r Alternative 1 - Use five new Series 5700 pumps similar to those installed at the Main
Street Pumping Station.
^' - The Model 5713/14-inch full-bore pumps would have 23-inch diameter
impellers connected to 125 horsepower motors operating at 705 rpm.
r - The pumps would be about 75 percent efficient at average flows.
Figure 4-4 shows the modified pump curves and the modified system head
curve.
Alternative 2 - Refurbish the existing F-M 'Tndel 5415/8-inch pumps to meet the new 9
and TDH requirements of a 5-pump station.
r
- The Model 5415/8-inch pumps would have 17-mch diameter impellers
connected to 125 horsepower motors to run at 1160 rpm.
r - Two of the five refurbished pumps would be operated by variable speed
drives.
- The refurbished pumps would be about 73 percent efficient at average
now.
4-7
ti
1 ! 7 ! 1 1 1 I ( 1 1 t 1 4 ! 1 1
o pGsY OV
60 q
S
V,
55 1k q
N
1- N t �y
LUtot
IL ; TB
O 50
Q
W
A y
N
45
40 - Legend
PUMPS :FAIRBANKS MORSE 5713/14"
705 RPM, 110 HP
35
0 4000 6000 12000 16000 20000 24000 26000 3200C
GPM SEWAGE PUMP PERFORMANCE
ALTERNATIVE 1
FIGURE 4-4
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Alternative 3 - Refurbish existing F-M Model 5415/8-mch pumps to meet the new 9 and
TDH requirements.
- The Model 5415/10-inch pumps would have 20-inch diameter impellers
connected to 100 horsepower motors operating at 870 rpm.
- The pumps would be about 78 percent efficient at average flows.
- Figure 4-5 shows the modified pump curves and the modified system head
curve.
Alternative 4 - Use five new F-M Model 5415/10-inch pumps similar to those now at the
Slater Avenue Pumping Station.
m
The pump's impeller diameter, horsepower rating, operating speed, and
efficiency are the same as Alternative 3.
- Figure 4-5 shows the modified pump curves and the modified system head
curve.
Recommendations
.. It is recommended that five new 5700 Series pumps similar to those at the Main Street
Pumping Station be installed.
These new pumps are recommended for the following reasons:
1. The past 5 years have seen a pronounced increase in major maintenance as shown
in the following excerpt from the Master Plan:
r Maintenance Summary
Slater Avenue Pumping Station
r Date Service
October 1973 Rebuilt Pump 3 and motor
October 1979 Installed new packing in Pump 3
March 1985 Rebuilt bearing head. installed new
volute, suction head, and
impeller for Pump 5
April 1985 Replaced bearing head, installed new
r
impeller in Pump 1
4-9
I ( 1 1 1 ! [ 1 [ l I l [ l l [ 1 [ l
65
G �
G
3 $ +s s 60 V�
g N a
9 p
N V 9
55
~ o
w
w
LL $
y
p 50
Q
W
A =
o LEGEND
45
PUMPS: FAIRBANKS MORSE 5415/10'
870 RPM, 100HP
40
35
0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24000 28000 32000
GPM SEWAGE PUMP PERFORMANCE
ALTERNATIVE 3
FIGURE 4-5
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
CJ'/VI`J_Y; OF ORANGE COUNTY
r
September 1985 Replaced bearing head, installed new
Impeller in Pump 4
December 1986 Installed new impeller,replaced
bearing head in Pump 2
July 1987 Installed new motor on Pump 5
r 1989 Installed new larger pump in replace
of Pump 1
2. Maintaining station reliability during the construction process will be much more
difficult If existing pumps have to be disconnected from existing piping, moved and
Installed in new piping and existing motors have to be disconnected moved and
Installed in a new system all while operating two pumping stations and two sets of
influent and effluent piping.
r
3. Any cost savings realized by not purchasing new pumps will be offset by the
Inconvenience, reflected In higher bid prices for the construction sequencing
,r mentioned in Item No. 3 above.
4. During the weeks involved in the process of having the existing pump impellers
.. trimmed, the pumps will not be available at the station.
New Series 5700 pumps are recommended because these pumps are used at the Main Street
r pumping sta0= and the Districts'maintenance personnel find the pumps to be reliable with
relatively easy maintenance.
r It Is recommended that 2 or 3 of the 5 pumps be equipped for variable-speed operation.
r 4.3 POWER
Service
r
The existing pumping station receives electric service from Southern California Edison,
underground, through 3 - 4-inch diameter conduits containing eighteen 300 MCM cables. The
r service is 3-phase, 480 volt and 1s based on an ultimate motor load of 605 horsepower. With
respect to pump loads and auxiliary loads, an upsized service of 1000/1250 kVA will be
r required. The existing main breaker size Is 50 amps. MCC compartments are sized for 5-120
horsepower starters and circuit breakers. However, based on the age of existing units and
construction sequencing restraints, new MCCs are recommended.
r
4-I1
r
Stand-by Power Generator
The CSDOC has determined that system reliability can best be achieved by Installing a
permanently mounted stand-by diesel engine/generator set in an above-gmund building at the
pumping station.
The starting loads or four 125 horsepower motors and other station equipment will require a
600 KW diesel engine driven generator similar to equipment currently operated in the Districts'
treatment facilities. The final decision should consider models with the lowest possible
emissions to maximize the operating time under AQMD's New Source limits.
The overall size of the generator set is about 12 feet long, 5 feet wide and 8 feet high. The
structure enclosing the power plant should have 3-4 feet clear around the equipment and
should be about 25 feet by 15 feet to allow for wall-mounted equipment. The cooling system,
exhaust. and room should all be designed to mmmize noise and vibration Impact.
4.4 STRUCTURE
Criteria
The CSDOC has decided that the pump station will be an above-ground structure with an
exterior architecturally designed to enhance the area. All major electrical equipment and
motors will be housed above street level for reliability.
The architectural treatment of the pumping station structure above grade must be attractive
for the industrial setting of the GTE property on which it will be built. but must also be in
keeping with the residences on the north side of Slater Avenue and pleasing to the drivers
passing on that street.
r
The structure Itself and connections to it will be designed to meet applicable seismic and other
building and fire codes.
Lifting rings and a portable A-frame and tackle will be used to remove and replace large
equipment pieces through floor openings. Adequate door and/or roof openings will be included
to permit access to the building to move large material.
Room Meshes will be selected to provide safe and easily cleanable surfaces in the workspaces.
The wet well should be designed In accordance with Hydraulic Institute standards for
dimensions based on pump flows.
4-12
Ventilation
The dry well part of the building will have no open connections to the wet well. Ventilation
equipment for the dry well volumes will provide for six air changes an hour when personnel are
_ present, and will operate on a timer when no personnel are present. Outside air will be forced
down to lowers at the lowest level by low noise fans and will exhaust through gravity louvers
at the upper levels.
Since the wet well will house no mechanical equipment requiring routine maintenance, It will
not be power ventilated. Employees entering the wet well should take precautions required in
confined spaces. The Districts have spenenee and procedures,for this type of work
size
r
The motor and pump part of the station should provide ample room around equipment for
servicing and removal. The pumps will be about 8 feet center to center and the stair slope will
be within OSHA standards with adequate landings. The outside pump station building
dimensions will be approximately 60 feet by 30 feet.
.. The bottom of the pump room slab will be at about elevation minus 30. The motor room
elevation will be about elevation 6.0 which is at least 6 inches above the highest adjacent
grade. This is 5 feet above the 100-year base flood elevation. The inside height of the motor
room will be about 14 feet dear.
As previously mentioned, the stand-by power generator enclosure will be about 25 feet by 15
s feet and it should be adjacent to but separated from the motor room.
The wet well size will be based on a maximum flow rate of 28.31 MGD or about 19.650 gallons
a minute. It will be divided Into two connected, but valved, parts for cleaning. Each part will
be accessible from the ground above. Wet well piping will include a valved station by-pass to
permit controlled draining of either force n
The wet well will be at least 40 feet wide and will permit suction from 5 pumps. each 8 feet
apart. The rectangular flat bottom will be at least 10 feet long and the sloped triangular
shaped floor will be about 15 feet long.
4.5 SITE
General
The lease for the present pumping station site is included in Appendix E. The new station will
be located at a site recommended herein in Appendix A and approved by the Districts and GTE.
s
4-13
The existing pumping station must be kept fully serviceable until the new station is complete
and operating.
The new pumping station should be located near the existing station. The only feasible sites
_ surrounding it are owned by GTE and are used for employee parking.
The pump station site will be attractively landscaped and enclosed with a block wall.
r Two site layouts are shown in Appendix A.
Area Requirements
Daily site access is by maintenance personnel in a small truck and often by repair personnel In
a larger vehicle. Access must allow personnel to safely drive to. from and through a security
gate, unlocking and locking it in the process without impeding traffic on Slater Avenue.
Puking and at least minimum vehicle tum-around area should be provided inside the fence.
These functions require an area of about 75 feet by 40 feet. some of which can be landscaped.
This area may be located over the wet well and assoclated valving appurtenances.
The building previously described, together with the generator enclosure and the vehicle area
will require a net area of about 5200 square feet and a gross area of about 6000 square feet.
compared to the existing 4100 square feet.
r All of the existing site can be renovated and returned to GTE usage for employee puking.
Drainage
The low point on the south side of Slater Avenue now drains slowly overland, around the east
and south side of the pumping station. Regardless of whether dffierential settling has resulted
in standing water there or whether the presence of water has weakened the soil causing the
settling, the low spot should have a catch basin and the flows piped to the nearly 54-inch
` diameter storm drain.
Easements
Land related uansactions between CSDOC and GTE should include the following Items:
1. Purchase of new land on which the pumping station and appurtenances will stand.
_ 2. Temporary construction easements to land that will be disturbed during the
construction.
r 4-14
3. Permanent sewer easements for pipes to and/or from the pumping station.
4. Conditions for returning presently leased land to GTE.
4.6 AUXILIARY SYSTEMS
Instrumentation
The Slater Avenue pumping station, following the standardized criteria of the CSDOC, will
transmit the following alarm signals over leased telephone lines to the control center at the
CSDOC offices:
r a. Person in station.
b. On battery power(indicates loss of single-phase power or loss of power to controls)•
C. fuss of ac power(no power to pumps).
.. d. Loos of control air.
e. Dry wet well Low water level In either wet well.
r
L High water level in either wet well.
g. Generator power on.
h. Water In the dry well.
r
Status signals will also be transmitted to the control center indicating the following for each
pump:
r
a. Pumps on/off.
r b. Check valves open/closed.
r A bubbler system will be installed in the carrier pipe in each wet well with standard bubbler
tubes Inserted from above so that the bottom of each tube is six inches above the floor. Each
bubbler system will have two 1/6 HP air compressors as standard with the Districts' current
r policy.
Odor Control
Since the dry well will be isolated from the wet well and will be routinely ventilated, offensive
gasses should not be a problem in the dry well.
r
4-15
r
The rising and falling levels of the raw sewage in the wet well require that fresh air enter the
well and that offensive gasses may be forced out to the atmosphere. To scrub this exhaust,
r small disposable activated carbon canisters are recommended.
Potable Water
The present station is served by a 3/4-inch potable water pipe which is not currently in
service.
The new station can use the same 3/4-inch potable water pipe,but the new system will Include
r an outside reduced pressure backllow preventer (required by code), an inside, float controlled
air-break tank and a small hydropneumatic system to repressurize the water for station wash
down.
s The new station will include a toilet and sink with an electric water heater.
r
4-16
CHAPTER 5
chapter 5
PROJECT COSTS AND SCHEDULES
5.1 GENERAL
The cost of sewer construction recommended In this report is based on the pipeline
construction costs curve from Volume 4 of the Master Plan for a July, 1987 cost level. The
curves plotted therein have been adjusted upward by a factor of 1.575 to account for Increases
due to inflation, appurtenances, and difficulty of construction. Escalation has been made to
the mid point of construction. The cost level is projected to be ENR1A 6400. Table 5-1 shows
® the unit prices from which the estimates have been made.
Applicable project costs including engineering, legal, and fiscal, and contingencies have been
added to the estimated construction costs. For this report, an allowance of 35 percent has
been added. This allowance is consistent with the Master Plan.
5.2 PROJECT COSTS
Table 5-2 shows the project costs for recommended sewer construction leading to the pumping
station.
Table 5-3 shows the estimated ject cost for the recommended sewer system from the
pumping station.
Table 5-4 shows the estimated project cost for the new Slater Avenue Pumping Station. The
cost shown does not include the land or possible special foundation conditions due to soil
*� factors at the site.
Table 5-5 shows the total estimated project cost for all the construction recommended in this
report.
5-1
TABLE 5-1
ESTIMATED UNIT PRICES FOR SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Sewer Pipe Unit
Diameter Price
Inches S/If
r
24 329
27 375
r
30 421
33 468
36 514
r 42 607
48 700
r
54 791
72 1072
(1) ENR-IA=6400
r
12) Legal.Administrative and Engineering Costs are not included
r
r
r
r
5-2
r
TABLE 5.2
ESTIMATED PROJECTS COSTS FOR
RECOMMENDED SEWERS TRIBUTARY TO PUMPING STATI0N")
Location Cost
Heil Ave.
1400 if 27"diameter $ 525,000
4000 if 36" diameter 2,056.000
Golden West St.
5250 If 42" diameter 3,186,800
Slater Ave. to P.S.
900 if 42" diameter 546,000
2001f 72" diameter 214,400
Total Estimated Construction Cost 6.528,200
Add 35%for Administration, Legal,
and Engineering Costs 2,285,000
Total Estimated Project Cost $8,813,200
Say $8.813.000
(11 ENR-LA= 6400
5-3
TABLE 5-3
ESTIMATED PROJECTS COSTS FOR
RECOMMENDED SEWERS FROM PUMPING STATIONII)
Location Cost
® Slater Avenue
Force Main 1000 If 36" diameter $ 244,800
1300 if 36"diameter to Nichols St. 509.400
1200 if 33"diameter 561.600
2650 If 36" diameter 1.362.100
Diversion Structure 91.000
Total Estimated Construction Cost $2,768.900
.. Add 35% for Administrative, Legal,
and Engineering Costs 969.000
-d Total Estimated Project Cost $3,738,000
I1) ENR-LA= 6400
5-4
m TABLE 5 4
SLATER AVENUE PUMPING STATION
ti ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS")
Estimated
Work Cost
r
Bonds. Insurance, Mobilization. etc. $230,000
Site Work 110,000
Demolition 125.000
Dewatering 300.000
Earthwork 350.000
Concrete 890,000
Metals &Plastics 50.000
Superstructure 120.000
Surface Treatments 120.000
.. Pumps, Pipe &Valves 780.000
Plumbing 2,500
Electric &Instrumentation 780,000
Generator Set 115.000
Ventilation 30.000
Miscellaneous 20,000
Construction Cost $4.022.500
Add 35% for Administrative. Legal.
and Engineering Costs 1-407,900
Project Cost $5.430.400
Say $5,430.000
(1) ENR-IA= 6400
a
5-5
d TABLE 5-5
TOTAL RECO NDED PROJECT COSTS(')
Project
Costs
Sewers Tributory to Pumping Station $8.813,000
Pumping Station 5,430,000
Sewers from Pumping Station 3,738,000
Total Recommended Project Cost $17.981.000
r
I1) ENR-LA= 6400
5-6
5.3 SCHEDULES
r Long range dates for implementation of recommendations detailed In this report are shown
graphically in Figure 5-1.
The priorities for construction based on recent flow measurement are as follows:
1. Slater Avenue Pump Station
2. Slater Avenue sewerage between Golden West Street and Nichols Street, including
the diversion structure there.
v
3. Golden West Street between Heil Avenue and Slater Avenue.
r
By diverting 5.4 MGD (average flow) from the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension at Nichols
Street, the trunk will be relieved of that flow effectively, giving it more capacity for higher flows
in the future.
While the Master Plan Indicates a future deficiency In the Slater-Springdale system, neither
r that need. nor the need to construct the Hell Avenue Interceptor 1s apparent at this time.
Both the Slater-Springdale system and the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extension should be
r metered at least yearly to determine flow trends and to predict the time when construction will
be necessary.
r
r
r
r
5-7
r
1990 IN 1991 1991 1V 19V
Jan Feb Nar r Na Jun IM Ago ISep 10ct Illov Ioec Jan Ifeb Illar 1hr Na Jun IJul Au Se Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb lKar 1kr [Kay Jun IM lAug ISeD
Notice to Proceed 0
DESIGN
.Surveyingf�
.Soils
AX Station Design
.Sewer Design
.501 CM Review
.901 CSOOC Reviev
Traffic Plans
City Review
.Final Chan es
CONSTRICTION
.Advertise Pro'ecls
.Award Contracts p
.Coast. Pup Station
.Coast. Sewers
Slater Avenue Pump Station and Sewers
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Preliminary Project Schedule
FIGURE 5-1
r
r
sd
r
r
r
r
w
CHAPTER 6
r
r
chapter
COST ALLOCATION
6.1 GENERAL
The previous chapters have described improvements that alleviate deficiencies for District 11
alone or Jointly serve both Districts 3 and 11. In addition to the remedial work, the
,o improvements provide for diverting 5.4 MGD of average flow from the Knott Trunk to the
Miller-Holder Trunk system. This flow is made up of contributions from both Districts. This
chapter outlines buy-in costs for future use of existing systems. It also discusses the
w allocation of these new costs between Districts 3 and 11. Buy-in costs are based on projected
average flow rates. Where peak flows are reported In this chapter, they are given for the
purposes of relating to hydraulic capacity.
6.2 NEW IMPROVEMENTS
s
The improvements recommended in this study include:
.. 1) Hell Avenue Interceptor
2) Golden West Trunk
r 3) Slater Avenue Pump Station-
Influent Relief Sewer
41 Slater Avenue Force Main
_ and Diversion Structure
5) Slater Avenue Relief Sewers
6) Slater Avenue Pump Station.
Heil Avenue Sewer/Golden West Trunk
m These sewers would relieve deficiencies in the Slater-Springdale Trunk and the existing Golden
West Trunk Sewer. These sewers serve District 11 only and all costs would be allocated to
District 11.
Slater Avenue Influent Sewer
From the intersection of Golden West Street and Slater Avenue, an existing 33-inch sewer flows
into the Slater Avenue Pump Station. This reach Is too small for future flows, and this report
r recommends construction of a 42-inch parallel sewer. These two pipes would carry both
District 3 and District I I flows to the new Slater Avenue Pump Station site. The existing
6-1
33-inch pipe Is owned 100 percent by District 11. However, there are existing District 3 flows
that enter the Slater System at the intersection of Slater Avenue and Golden West Street.
r In review of Figure 3-2, the 33-inch pipe has a peak hydraulic capacity of 19.09 MGD, while
the total peak flow is projected to be 28.31 MGD. The existing pipe has insufficient capacity for
District 11 flows even without the District 3 contribution.
In terms of average flow, District 3 is projected to contribute 2.33 MGD. This flow is discussed
in Section 3.4. The average District 11 flow is projected at 17.94 MGD, considering planned
land use downgrades and resulting flow reductions from Bolas Chlca. Therefore, District 3
contributes 11.5 percent of the total contributory flow to the pump station. This relates to a
peak flow of 3.26 MGD.
The relief sewer provides for an additional peak capacity of 9.22 MGD. Therefore, the District 3
share would be 35A percent (3.26 -, 9.22 x 100).
r
The existing 33-inch Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and new 42-inch sewer would Join a new
72-inch sewer and convey the wastewater east and south to the new wet well. This protect cost
is allocated in the same manner as the pump station costs discussed below.
r
Pump Station/Force Main
The new pump station and force main would serve both District 3 and District 11 in proportion
to their average flow contribution. The District 3 share would be 11.5 percent while the
District 11 share would be 88.5 percent.
Slater Avenue Relief Sewers
�+ The Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer Extenslon from west of Koledo Lane to Newland Street would
require a parallel relief sewer. This portion of the trunk is owned only by District 11 and
carries only District 11 flows.
s
Summary of New Costs
w The new improvements along with the allocation of costs is given in Table 6-1. Of the total
project costs, the District 3 share would be $1.050,000, while the District 11 share would be
$16,931.000. These are at ENRLA 6400.
6-2
TAR1E 6.1
PROJECT COST SPLR
NEW 1NIPROVEMENTS
District District District District
No.I� No. 11 No. 3 No. 11 District District
Flow12) Flow Share Share No. 3 No. 11
Item Protect Cost(1) (MGD) (MGD) (%) (%) Cost Cost
Heil Avenue
Interceptor $3.484.000 0 NA O 100 0 $3,484,000
Golden West Trunk
Sewer $ 4.302.000 0 NA 0 100 0 $4,302,000
m Slater Avenue Pump
w Station Influent
Relief Sewer $ 737.000 2.33 4.26 35.4 64.6 $ 261.000 $ 476,000
Slater Avenue Force
Main/Gravity Sewer/
Diversion Structure $ 1.141.000 2.33 17.94 11.5 88.5 $ 131.200 $ 1.009,800
Slater Avenue Relief
Sewers $2.597.000 0 NA 0 100 0 $2.597.000
Slater Avenue Pump
Station/72"
Influent $5,720,000 2.33 17.94 11.5 88.5 $ 657.800 $5,062.200
$17.981.000 $1,050,000 $16.931.000
(1) Costs 3rd Quarter 1989
(2) All flows average
6.3 EXISTING FACILITIES
Cost Basis
Currently, District 3 is utilizing the slater Avenue Pumping Station and force main. These are
owned by District 11. The diversion at Nichols Street will also result in District 3 flows in a
District 11 sewer. This Section discusses the buy-in cost for District Three's use of these
facilities.
As part of this discussion, two other District 3/District 11 ownership exchanges are included.
m One Is the buy-in cost for District Three's use of District Elevens Newland-Delaware Trunk
Sewer, Newland Street Interceptor, and Coast Trunk Sewer from newland to Plant No. 2. This
exchange was presented in a report prepared by Wllldan titled "Study and Recommendations
,r for Exchange of Service Areas Between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11." The second
Is for District Eleven's use of the Miller-Holder Trunk for local collection in the southeast
comer of the District. This is discussed in the 1989 Master Plan.
A cost allocation for the diversion of District 11 flows into the Miller-Holder Trunk System Is
not required. District 11 owns sufficient capacity In the Knott Interceptor for its projected
flows without the diversion. District 3 owns the remainder.The diversion to the Miller-Holder
Trunk does not result in any downstream deficiencies. The Miller-Holder hunk Is owned by
District 3. The diversion from the Knott Interceptor benefits District 3. Therefore, the
diversion should be viewed as an exchange.
The cost basis for the exchange is based on the present, updated value of each item involved.
The actual cost of the Slater Avenue Force Main and the Nichols Street Sewer Items along with
date of completion and ENRIA at that time are reported in Table 6-2. The cost has then been
w updated to the third quarter. 1989 ENRIA of 5766. This is the present cost level. The cost
basis of the remaining items are given below.
Buy-in Costs
The existing Slater Avenue Force Main Is owned entirely by District 11. As shown in Table 6-1
previously, District 3 will need to own 11.5 percent of the capacity.
The Nichols Street Sewer is owned 100 percent by District 11. Most of the flow is a result of
the diversion. The average flow at the reach between Manholes 292 to 131 is projected at
5.53 MGD. District 3 will have an average contribution of 2.33 MGD or 42.1 percent. No
improvement is recommended for the Ntchols Street Sewer.
As presented in Table 6 of the Wllldan 9Pnort. District 3 would need to pay District No. 11 for
interest as follows:
6-4
r TABLE 6-2
COST BASIS FOR EBISTING FAC=IES
PmJect ENRI.A Updated
Original Completion at Cost at
Item Cost Date Completion ENRLAr5766
24-inch Slater Ave.(I)
Force Main $ 130,000 6-9-82 4533 $ 165,400
Nichols Street
Gravity Sewer-
MH 296-131(2) $ 116,600 9-23-66 1110 $ 602,600
(1) Only includes the 24-inch force main that will remain In service.
(2) MH 131 is on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at Nichols Street.
r
r
6-5
r
1) Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer $1,006,110
r. 21 Newland Street Interceptor $ 282,008
3) Coast Trunk Sewer from Newland to Plant No. 2 $ 215.682
41 Credit for esfcrinea Distrlct 3 ownership in ($ 969,277)
Newland-Delaware
r Subtotal $ 534.523
These costs are at ENRIA 5474. At the December, 1989 level of 5766. the net buy-m is
$563,036.
As reported In the 1989 Master Plan, District 11 must purchase are additional 1.95 MGD in
r the Miller-Holder Trunk from Magnolia Street to Plant No. 2. District 11 is currently using this
capacity for local collection. The sewer In this reach is 78 inches in diameter with a capacity of
53.49 MGD. District I Vs share would be 3.60 percent. Based on construction cost
,. information in the 1989 Master Plan, the estimated value of the reach is $6,450,000. The
buy-in cost would be$232,200.
Calculation of the respective buy-in is given in Table 6.3. This shows the existing ownerships,
needed ownerships, and buy-in costs. The result is that District 3 would pay District 11 for
the net cost of ownership transfer total of$630.836.
r
r
r
r
r
6-6
r
c t I i i I
TABLE 6-3
PROJECT BUY-IN COSTS
Exlstina Ownership 1%) Needed Ownership M) Buy-in Cost
Updated District District District District District District
Item Cost 3 11 3 11 3 11
ENRIA= 5766
24-111eh Slater
Avenue Force Main(') $ 165.400 0 100 11.5 88.5 8 19.000 O
Nichols Street
Gravity Sewer
MH 296-131(2) $ 602,600 O 100 42.1 57.9 $254.000 0
Newland/Delaware/01
m Coast Trunk Exchange N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $563.036 0
v
Miller-liolder
Trunk Sewer $6.450,000 100 0 96.4 3.60 0 $232.200
Totals $863.036 $232,200
Net Buy-in Cost to District 3 $630.836 --
(1) Only includes the 24-inch force main that will remain In service.
(2) Will 131 is on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at Nichols Street.
(3) From Wllldan Report
J
rl
YN
ti
v
APPENDIX A
J
GTE SITE LAYOUTS
SEWER PLANS & PROFILES
J
.I
J
J
J
J
wi
.M.T.. Pw
A.TO NIONOLB STREET NSEI
:.M.TO GOTHARD ST.IRESERVEI
NEW P.E.WFI
RIpM OpOEN WEE!BiNEET EXMI
\�Be
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE IS NOT SHOWN.
CONTOUR LINES ARE FROM OLD G.T.E.PLAN.
EXISTING PUMPING STATION WILL BE DEMOLISHED
AND THE SITE WILL BE RETURNED TO GTE READY
FOR PARKING.
- ATRR AVENUE PUMP STATION
EA
SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT CONTNACT NO.IT-N .1WIXXN
_ - PROTECT REPORT
X kL=--
----- -�iwlT G T E SITE N cnn PUMP STATION LAYOUT 1 • xo
1 EOP R
&IY:f W
4 W NCNOL! STREET IIISEI
'µ V OOTNARO ST.IRESERVEI
_rrtM I.9.ON1 ••
IAM OOLgN WE91 MS.T r_,BIIBI
�a
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE IS NOT SHOWN.
CONTOUR LINES ARE FROM OLD G.T.E.PLAN.
EXISTING PUMPING STATION WILL BE DEMOLISHED
AND THE SITE WILL BE RETURNED TO GTE READY
FOR PARKING.
_ .ATER AVENUE IONO STATION +NI YO
-- .__.9f9ifY lYIflWFYINi fg9iR�CI NO.IPV 3"94
RIIpIi W41xWN .
G 7 E Sf7E
W9WNrgN MP STATION LAYOUT 2 2 r
2 e. 2
INFLUENT
WET WELL
P P P
PUh
SIOEWAUK
1 �
y r N-
(1 -
1 �
MOTC
0
SLATES AVENUE PUMP STATION
OE SYBEEY INMOrEYENt CpIMµT am,,-N "wm0 x
..EC,
PEIWT
ur. wn n ErEN1EtNN LAYOUT I m xo
r
r
SCALE 1/8* -T-8'
AP ROROE MAIN
INPLUENT
p
WET
�- WELL
r
r
r >'
r �
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION mn xa
E SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT COMNIACT NOdI-O �mxox
PROTECT REPMT
IRS
LAYOUT 2 s.EEr xo.
TB REY. EA BY WSpMP}IPN
SOUTH SLATER AVE NORTH
R
B"G_
__
I PAC. ___ ___ GTE E 10
12'W I I T
I Y T I * I I rn
- - - 0 D
y
IS 33'SEWER Z
NEW 42" SEWER r
-10 m
-20
SLATER AVENUE
SECTION "A" @ STA. 108+00
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
'COUNTY ON DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY
I l [ [ [ [ [ l I t l ! 1 [ I
ELEVATION
IN FEET
20
SOUTH SLATER AVE NORT
- - R --- 10
PAC. I GT
S•G E
12'W S•S
i
0
54• SD
33' � I SEWER NEW 72" SEWER
-10
-20
SLATER AVENUE
SECTION "B" Q STA. 101+00
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
P� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
/Y'VIIy.TS OF ORANOE COUNTY
e e e e e e e e t e e e e e e t e e e
20
SOUTN SLATER AVE
NORTH
w PAC. PM g•g 24'
LL 10 S'G 12iW 1 1 R TPMAIN—GTE E
? i T
z
0
a p NEW 36"
w o FORCE MAIM
J
W
_10 _-
SLATER AVENUE
SECTION "C" @ STA. 98+00
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
so
SOUTH NORTH
R PAC. SLATES AVE R
L 1
40 8"W GTE
w 8"S 30-S 1 30'S T E
I 8'G
z
O
f. -
LU
W
20
NEW 36" FORCE MAIN
SLATER AVENUE
SECTION "D" @ STA. 87+00
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
1 1 1 1 I l 1 l t 1 I I t 1 l I 1 [ 1
ao
sour+ SLATER AVE -NORTH
R PAC. Blg I
T I GTE
H � I 30•g I 30'3
T
w S'G E
LL 30-
Z + Q
O
Q I �
wJ 20
w
NEW 36' FORCE MAIN
SLATER AVENUE
SECTION "E" @ STA. 79+50
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
ao -
sourH SLATER AVE NORTH
30 LIJ
R 4
w 42'S
U- ' 8'S - T S'W T
Z 3'G
Z
20
O
10 \ -
NEW 33' SEWER
SECTION 'F' @ STA. 40+00
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
1 1 1 l ( 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 l 1 t 1 1 1 1
40
SOUTH NORTH
SLATER AVE
30 i rY
w i 4'G T S'S I SS•S 48•�
w �
LL
2
z 20
I j �
I
J
W
10
0
SECTION 'G' Q STA. 14+00
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
[J'/vILJ_Y{ OF ORANGE COUNTY
r
7EAST 20
II, OIL /EST
r I ELEC 8 1'6* R
1 �
I I
w
r w
'° LL
Z
r Z
O
f
0 >
w
J
W
r
EAST 20
r STANDARDST
OIL R
S
ELEC S6 F
r S Ui
w
10 LL
tit =
r I 2
O
r >
0 w
W
r
GOLDEN WEST ST.
SECTION "H" @ STA.19+00 &
SECTION "J" @ STA. 42+00
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
r n SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF GRANGE COUNTY
r
}yr
Y1I
Y�
V
if
L
APPENDIX B
r
MASTER PLAN PRINTOUTS
r
i
µ
�i
II
f
d
iu
SOURCE - MASTER PLAN
' Boyle Engineering Corporation 9 9 Ne0, Nor 30, 1988, Il:IB PM Page a
Sewer Analysis Sanitary Load Applications
.. aN011 S)STEM s L;S! UPDATED 11/29190 IGO SLATER SPRINGDALE RELIEF SEWER
A MM Slope Dia- Capaaitiesa Area Flo. Point Avg. Total Vet- De0th Encase Under Capacs
Op Iowa meter Peal Avg. Input Source Floe Flo- Daily Ratio Avg Cap Repl. Nat'l Identification
616 634 .00104 27 5.67 3.60 .0 .00 .00 4.71 7.40 2.9 )1.0 30 21 SPRIN64ALE 6 EDINGER
new 634 612 .00115 27 6.19 3.00 .0 .00 .00 4.11 7.40 2.7 )1.0 30 21
632 630 .4"M 71 1.97 1.06 .0 .00 .00 4.71 1.40 2.9 )LO IS 21 SPRINGDALE 6 NEIL
630 623 .00149 27 7.05 4.17 .0 .00 ,DO 4.71 7.40 3.4 .70 30 12
528 626 .00O15 27 2.24 1.29 .0 .00 .00 4.11 7.40 2.9 )LO /5 39
w
654 626 2.69 .00 9
626 624 .00014 16 4.63 2.83 .0 .00 .00 1.40 11.29 2.3 )1.0 31 12 SPRINGDALE 6 OCFCC
621 622 .00005 36 2.13 1.66 $2.6 .11 .00 1.53 11.39 2.5 )1.0 60 51
600 622 4.93 .00 O
was 622 620 .00075 36 10.77 .1.09 167.1 .41 .00 12.06 18.63 4.1 )1.0 /5 33
620 610 .00060 36 )0.25 6.12 515.1 .97 .09 13.75 19.92 4.3 )1.0 10 36 SLATER 6 SPRiNGOALE
618 616 .00075 36 10.77 7.09 .0 .00 .00 13.75 19.82 4.3 )LO 18 36
46 611 .00140 36 14.71 9.95 .0 .00 .00 13.75 19.02 4.3 )1.0 12 27 SLATER 6 EDWARDS
r
all 612 .00110 36 13.04 8.11 2137.7 2.67 .00 16.65 23.62 5.2 )1.0 15 36
'um612 610 .0001/ 36 9.25 3.30 .0 .00 .00 16.65 23.62 5.2 A.0 51 40 SLATER 6 RATOR
610 609 .00102 36 12.57 0.36 DTA .14 .00 16.79 23.31 3.3 )1.0 48 36
s 6N Sol 1.66 .00 0
608 606 .00375 33 19.09 13.21 001.3 1.61 .00 20.21 20.31 7.4 )LO 39 27 SLATER 6 GOLDERNEST
Spite Engineering Corporation ded. No• 30. 799R, 11:18 PM Page 2
u. Se.er Analysis Sanitary Load AADlicalions
,101! SKtEN ; LAST UPDATED Il/29a88 NO SLATER SPRINGDALE TRUNK SEWER
r MN MN Slope pia- Capacities: Area Floe Point Avg. Total Vel- Depth Excess Under CaPac:
0p come aster Peal Avg. Input Source Floe Flaw ocity Ratio Avg Cap Rapt. Nat'l Identification
664 662 .00210 15 1.02 .55 183.7 .34 .00 .34 .66 7.3 .39 .21 SPRINGDALE 6 BOLSA
662 660 .00160 15 .84 .11 499.5 1.00 .00 1.34 2.33 2.9 )I.0 21 21 SPRINGDALE 1 NCFADDE
sme 660 658 .00120 21 3.23 1.97 228.6 .46 .00 1.90 3.05 2.6 .77 Az SPRIN60ALE 6 EDINGER
659 656 .00020 21 1.99 1.07 260.8 .91 .00 2.62 1.30 2.1 )LD 33 27 SPRINGDALE I NEIL
1
656 654 .00160 21 5.33 3.30 .0 .00 .00 Z.62 6.30 3.1 .66 .69
_ 654 626 .00160 24 5.33 3.30 36.7 .07 .00 2.69 4.41 3.2 .65 .62
APPENDIX B SHEET I OF 3
man
wat
f - SOETR(eE - MASTER PLAN
Boyle Engineering Corporation Ned. Nov 30, 1989, 13:19 PH Pepe 2
Sewer Analysis Sanitary Load Applications
w
!,107T 5'/SIEH lFif UPDATED II/77/811 MOO
MR AN Slope Dia- Capacities, Area Flow Point Avg. lotpl Yet- Depth Excess Under Capau
w Up Dom meter Peal Avg. Input Source Flow Flow ocity Ratio Avg Cap Rep]. Rei'1 Identification
_ 616 674 .00220 12 .54 .27 44.1 .00 .00 .00 .17 1.5 .26 .20 SOLDENNESI 6 EDINGER
610 672 .00180 15 .BP .41 191.3 1.50 .00 1.61 2.76 3.5 )1.0 21 21 BOLOENNEST I HEIL
.� 672 670 .00100 15 .19 .11 30.5 .23 .00 1.16 3.15 4.0 )1.0 21 21 SOLDENNEST B WARNER
670 600 .00120 27 6.32 3.91 .0 .00 .00 1.96 3.15 2.6 .47 2.11
man
Style E+g!neertng Corporation Neo, Nov H. 1988, o:i8 FN Page a
Sewer :na Leis Sanitary Load loolicat>ors
va,
o:Gr' iis:i' .-TI.P O it i7!53 e6D
NH AN Slope Dia- Capacities: Area Flow Point Avg. Total gel- Depth Excess Under Capac:
Up Down meter Peak Avg. Input Source Flow Flow ocity Ratio Avg Cap Repl. Rel't Tomtiiiution
670 608 1.06 .00 U
saw 609 606 .00375 33 19.09 13.21 091.3 1.61 .00 20.27 29.31 7.4 )1.0 39 27 SLATER 6 GOLDEMWEST
606 604 .00400 30 15.29 10.38 .0 .00 .00 20.27 29.31 8.7 )1.0 39 30 SLATER I P.S.
604 602 .00000 30 21.62 15.12 .0 .00 .00 20.27 28.31 0.9 )1.0 36 21 SLATER I AR
602 600 .01030 36 39.89 29.43 .0 .00 -5.38 14.19 21.31 9.5 .19 14.54 SLATER I NICHOLS
an
600 $99 .00014 42 16.13 11.00 .0 .00 .00 1/.89 21.31 3.4 >1.0 18 30 BTU. MORGAN 6 KOLEDO
mum599 326 .00074 12 16.13 11.00 418.4 1.12 .00 16.60 23.36 3.0 )1.0 51 33 SLATER I BEACH
wwr
r
APPENDIX B SHEET 2 OF 3
r
r
r
r SOURCE - MASTER PLAN
Boyle Engineering Corporation Ned, Nov SO, 1789. 9:04 AM Page I
Sewer Analysis Sanitary Load Applications
war' MLLE9-401-BE9 S(SJE0 1 LAST OFnAIEO 11129,69 MSD
MR MN Slope Oil- Capacilieil Area Flow Point Avg. Total Vel- Depth Excess Under Capact
Up Down meter Peal Avg. Input Source Flew Flow oche Ratio Avg Cap FORT. Bel'1 Identification
296 294 .00210 21 6.11 3.03 .0 .00 3.38 3.38 8.36 4.1 )1.0 27 21 NICHOLS 6 SLATER
la' 294 292 .00610 21 10.41 6.03 32.0 .13 .00 3.53 0.57 6.2 .63 1.31 NICHOLS
292 131 .00570 21 10.01 6.59 .0 .00 .00 5.53 0.51 6.0 .66 1.06 NICHOLS
w
r
Boyle Engineering Corporation Ned, Nov 30, 1980. 13:10 FM Fags 2
Sewer Analysis Sanitary Load Applications
ti 1110TT SYSTEM : LAST UPDATED it/27/88 NCO
MN AN Slope Dia- Capacities: Area Flaw Point Avg, Total Vel- Depth Excess Under Capau
r, Up Down meter Peal Avg, Input Source Flow Flow acite Ratio Avg Cap Aepl. ReFf Identification
576 571 .00130 10 1.22 .67 711,3 1.67 .00 1.61 2.84 2.5 )1.0 21 21 SLATER 6 NEWLAND
r
Boyle Engineering Corporation Wed, No, 30. 1930. 9:04 AM Page 1
r Sewer Analysis Sanitary Load Applications
MILLER-POLDER SYSTEn I LAST UPDATED 11/0/08 M6D
r MN MH Slope Dia- Capacities: Area Flow Point Avg. Told gel- Depth Excess Under Capar.
Up Down meter Peak Avg. Input Source Flow Flow stile Ratio Avg Cap Repl. Rel'f Identification
126 121 .00011 12 61.71 17.30 335.8 .67 .00 39.03 31.17 3.6 .71 8.21 MAGNOLIA 6 NAANEA
APPENDIX B SHEET 3 OF 3
i 1 I i 1 I I 1 i i I I I
APPENDIX D
SLATER AVENUE PUNMINO STATION PROJECT
INDEX TO PLANS IN JCR FB,ES
Golden Slater Slater Huntington
Springdale Heil West Ave. Ave. Nichols Beach
Ave. Ave. St. W/O P.S. E/O P.B. St. Others City
Street Improvement 100 300 400 500 600 700
Telephone 205 305 505 605 705
Gas 210 310 510 610
Electric 215 315 415 515 615
City Water A Sewer 520
City Water 528 625 825
City Sewer 230 330 430 530 730 830
County Sewer 135 335 435 538 635 735
Cable T.V. 240 340 440 540
Storm Drain 245 346 445 545 845
Richfield Oil 350 550
Texaco Oil 355
Northam Gas 360
Gulf Oil 365
Caltrans 570
r
r
r
r
HID HI,IM S,NSFPdSY3
QNY r
SNHWEHHOV asvaI NOIIVIS ONIdWLId
r
H XIGNad TV
r
r
r
r
ro
r
tq
r
of
E.ecv:eme ON.,;es GTE California Incorporated
r
One GTE Piave
TWusano Oaks.Cakfornia 91362-381,
805 372.6000—Oxwei 805 372 6282
r
In Reply Refer To
r January 26, 1988 3521
L.2
r '
County Sanitation Districts
r Of Orange County, California
Mr. Bob Chenowith
Senior Engineering Aide
for Tom Dawes
10844 Ellis
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
s, Dear Bob:
RE: LEASE AGREEMENT, GTE CALIFORNIA PROPERTY, SLATER AVENUE,
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA
r
Enclosed are two signed lease agreements for the above mentioned
Properties. Please sign both and return one to us along with the
easement Permit.
Please feel free to contact me at (805) 372-6684 should you have further
questions.
r
Sinc
Y40Y
Real Es a Development
Senior Analyst
r RAL:,ld/SS199
Enclosure (2)
r
w
r
4 Pan of GTE Ccrporauon
w
s
LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY
It is agreed by and between General Telephone Company of California, dba
GTE California Incorporated (hereinafter called "Lessor") and County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County California (hereinafter called .
"Lessee") that Lessor hereby leases to Lessee certain real property being
. located on Slater Avenue in Huntington Beach, as indicated in Exhibit A
attached hereto.
The leasing of said property is subject to the following terns and
conditions:
1. The term of this lease shall be five (5) years beginning February 1,
.r 1988.
2. Lessee will pay to Lessor as rent the sum of One Thousand Nine
w. Hundred dollars ($1,900.00) per year, payable in advance of the
commencement of each year.
3. The lease premises shall be used by the Lessee for the placement of
�'— an on-site generator to. serve the adjacent Slater Avenue Pump Station.
-4. The lease agreement shall be subject to Lessee obtaining an
encroachment permit from the City of Huntington Beach. The city has
been granted an easement by the Lessor for the purpose of providing
storm drainage. The encroachment permit shall be presented to Lessor
before Lessee may begin any activities on Lessor's land.
„w
5. Lessee shall maintain and repair the property during the term of its
occupancy at the Lessee's own cost and expense, and upon termination
of the lease, return the property to its condition at the beginning
of the lease upon Lessor's request.
6. Should any improvements be made to the property, all of Lessee's
plans and specifications for the improvements must receive Lessor's
prior approval . Lessor's approval of plans and specifications shall
not be deemed or construed as approval of engineering design or
integrity.
7. Lessee agrees to comply, at Lessee's own cost and expense, with all
requirements of municipal , state and federal authorities pertaining
to said premises and the business conducted therein and not to engage
in or allow any business or occupation that is forbidden by law to be
carried on, in or about said premises.
8. Lessee agrees to pay all charges for gas, electricity, water or other
utilities that may be used in or upon or charged against the lease
property during the term of this lease or any extension thereof.
9. Lessee shall indemnify and hold Lessor and its employees harmless from
any and all claims, damages and suits, by whomever brought, arising
w out of or relating to Lessee's use of the subject premises, whether
such claims and suits arise before or after termination or
conclusion of this agreement, howsoever and by whosoever caused
including, but not limited to, the active and passive negligence
(1)
ev
SS169
r
r
of Lessor, its agents, servant or employees, or any third parties,
solely or contributorily. Said duty to indemnify and hold harmless
includes the duty to defend Lessor .and its employees against such
liability, claims, damages and suits or other legal proceedings and
to assume and pay for all expenses of, and incidental to, such
defense.
10. Lessee shall maintain insurance policies in full force and effect
for the term of this agreement, with carriers authorized to do
r business in California, with a financial rating of at least an A+3A
status as rated in the most recent edition of insurance reports and
satisfactory to Lessor, as follows:
r (a) Worker's Compensation Insurance covering Lessee's full liability
under all applicable Worker's Compensation laws in California.
r (b) Comprehensive Public Liability Insurance in the amount of a
minimum of $1,000,000 for death and injury to one person.
(c) Property Damage Insurance on the amount of a minimum of $500,000
�— for property damage resulting for any one occurrence.
The Insurance under (b) and (c) shall insure Lessee and Lessor
against all claims for bodily injury, death, destruction of
property which may arise from operations under this lease, whether
such operations shall be by Lessee or by any one directly or
indirectly employed by Lessee, and shall expressly cover liability
assumed by Lessee under this lease. Each policy shall provide that
the amount of coverage provided therein -shall not be reduced or
terminated without ten (10) days written notice first being given to
r Lessor. Certificates of Insurance incorporating the above
endorsements shall be presented to Lessor before Lessee may begin any
activities on Lessor's land.
" 11. The terms of this lease shall inure to and be binding upon the heirs,
executors, successors and assigns of the parties hereto, provided,
however, the Lessee may not assign this lease or sublet any part of
.. the lease property without first obtaining the written consent of the
Lessor.
r 12. Lessee agrees that Lessor, or Lessor's agents, may at all reasonable
times and during reasonable hours have free access to said leased
Premises for the purpose of examining or inspecting the condition
thereof or of exercising any right of this lease.
r
13. In the event that any legal action is instituted by either of the
parties hereto to enforce the terms, conditions and covenants of
,r this lease, the party prevailing in any such action shall be entitled
to recover all court costs and reasonable attorney's fee to be set by
the court.
r .
r
SS169 (2)
14. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by
sending same by mail to the parties at their addresses as set forth
below, or at such other addresses as the parties may from time to time
notify each other in writing.
For Lessor:
General Telephone Company of California
One GTE Place
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362-3811
s Attention: Real Estate Development, RC 3521
For Lessee:
w.
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
.. Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
r— GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY COUNTY OF SANITATION DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA, dba OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
,r By BY
Vice President -
r Network Operations
a, Assistant Secretary
r
RM APPROV"
_ AtE0111hr
r
(3)
SS169
,.r
pw
i _ »o-.ol":fit awas; � .,.� ..:.,{: ;'.. '��'••
17
va
i
e. /1
4
I , 10i0 oO011 . Arald
/.1N*ro�.d7HY'etC •IIoN� 17ro141a `r+0,yV1�M'VC !1J.t+�+oj •.. .
�' t {.La ,'. M 11 21• �Q S Y '9a.i NO"L-j ;. _
I. yo. ►AMt'.1%%4-.'do`,6�Q µ.7letas( t�tuV/tN . aei; ,. • .
J
J
u
y APPENDIX F
POMP DATA
li
J
J
RECORDING REQUESTED BY 4ECORGEDAT UEaT F
w N f. II Y N `1
ORANGE CZATY.CALIF.
�. WHEN RECORDED M 11, TO Now 10 .l 26 M IS
I.WYLL LAALYLE
GOUIRY SANITATION DISTRICTS COUNTY RECORDER
m,x s Ts
.. 10544 ELLIS A ENUE FREE
—SPACE ADOYE=S LtNa MR RECORDER'S Use
r
GRANT OF EASEMENT
THIS INDENTUR&ntl.m.•I.r bm LLb '?th d w September .1968
4Y r btw.P
G�ilEhAl. 'I'ti L�Ppf'L.i NrAf AITC (F ULIVRIIIA, a cornoration
bn.mr.
W ruupry 9uiutim DWu N.11,a G,••A.Cn 0.C.lilmui.••PNIpmrPnlim.Grob.
WITNESSETH: F.,•wdm m.Wntlm IE. Gromr da br.bY Arot Wm Ib Grrs
n.b W wY b ruhbd mnmp ud mJnWn Im.11 lbr.w611e rwr P rwn.oG.ppur4um la urwyp® uG
alpn(WYmruip n.l pnprnY YunW u Ib Couvty W Oray.,81.4 ul CYllpmia mon p.em,Yv1Y ernibetl u foYo.r:
r
6n easement, for sewer north
over the south f Year, of the
north LO feet 2{) the north one-third ar era of tthhe north
one-half (J arte of the west threeichartters ('.1 h9in of the
srnthweet Ant,
in the ant of aecticn 26 Tow in the
5 South
i,;:n;te gt .lest, in the Rancho La Aolsa ateChitao In the pity of
SLO .iontnfE -each, nonta of (range State of California as
SLction ne is shown on a map office
of he Book 51 pager of
:;lscellaneous I;ape, in the office of the County T?ecozder of
r EF.id rcunty of Crange.
.;xcepting therefrom the west 1010 feet and the eaFt 920 feet.
r
ylf
THIS GRANT 4 I!.!WI ued.n,mtlly.rd medlti Ibt Ib Gnm Er mPw oI
rM....er.w tlr M.Iv m—rl&Ai Ol Nu Marl..nLL wparty Imviihrtl..rmtu nmm Fur.
r ''8101 • 443 .w.ma.pmrtrr.w.mrwmhPwm.u..l.nP,pr.dl.m.t m.m
LL IM CERTIFICATE mFn a IGrml.h.11 b.rwmN M I4.Gruur r nu,beCERTIFICATE OF ACCDTANCE irotr.Funb.r.it u um.nme wu mn..enm.m mrA p..Nk rover o1
f4.:,x rxxF+n v.i..rnn. b r wvwn a ®pll.r wth .wh mla W
I.r ,eneral;elePmm�e....ComOagY... a.b...o b m.d.ml, Ir..nim
n . � cd..'IidY.d�.., it LL.mn Grolri rihu.bll uvlud.LL.ntht m mmlmn.M�-
..xww v4.r,v^ f WmPfN wtl4 p'Inww ratios m.r.rlW.YduM trW rvP.d rnim
.x. •. •lur al IrWk rv.r WP vhd mm�um m.Y.auud tAiw LLe mrl.m
GENERAIC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF
Y CALIFORNIA a co oration
_..•Anvuoas., a
°r 11 ce tee nc
r 1
11 •f V
As, etanc Sec ••
oc�o6tlr 21 1966
CARL VON HAKEr ,
tr.......a._ Vice
H. RATYM RHYTIER la_
,..... a..a s nn..�.s..� .�..�a�w Rorer ulc.cuwtw•
•�" IIIN[04 MI4 w
r uslW.d a.�v,r.0 m.vA.mr b.wn 101•MItl COWM1
a°gym" Col�via T'-I" �
! 196r
f.0 WIIIYY.p ./ � 1
1 l 1 I 1 I I 1 i I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I t
PUMP STATION SLATER AVENUE. - Dist. 11
Pump 0 1 Pump 0 2 Pump 0 3 Pump 0 4
Make of Pump Fairbanks-Morse Fairbanks-Morse Farrbanks-Morse Fairbanks-Morse
Serial No. K2111040504 K98479 Not Available K2PI055931
Model 6 Size 5414/8" 5415/8" 5415/8" 54I5/8"
Impeller No./Dia. 14-3/4" 18" 181. .19"
RPM 825 1150 880 882
Motor HP, Voltage 40/440 75/220-440 75/440 75/N/A
Drive (Const, Var) Constant Constant Constant Constant
Design Point 1400 / 45 N/A / 3000 / 45 3000 / 45
)Flav(gpm)/TDH (feet))
EXISTING PUMPS
APPENDIX F
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
Source: Reliability Analysis COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
I I ... IO x
80 _.
r 0 Z
1600
u 60 I5.00 ___606R1 I :.
.off• M MODEL
a
1NG i
13.00
w 79 5414
ao r.. n_i_ PUMP NO.1
__ ._.__
670 flPM
... :... 1 . ._I. ....._...__ _._. ....
20
_. . __
70
20
10
I ^0
r 0 500 1000 IS00 2000 2500 3WO
U.S.GPM
r
EXISTING PUMP NO.1
r i 1
NPRNR 1 S0 ri
— 25 i
_ 200+ 0 2
ISO
EXISTING IMPELLER
= n.ou 6s 7u PUMP NC
. _._. ._ MODEL
c
_ F . o ..__. R so 3111001 9
150
� 5415
78 1R0 RP M
Q 70
_ 501
0 150
_ PIP 8.00
. _..... __.__.--_._...16.00 . 100 h
2
.. .. .. .. 50 m
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
U.S. GPM
_ EXISTING PUMPS NO.2 & NO.4
APPENDIX F
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
_
r
r
�2p IF
Nr9i1 I - s
I
r 10) I I 1 ! - i 1 Z
? ism -
--�-_ _ EX
u so= ` ISTING IMPELLER' _
17.00 65 ' o 75 - - MODEL
Z . —: _
p 16A0 18 i� :'.i $415
r z 60� Bl I '11 __
BI ' 870 RPM
O bl ' - 7BI 73
r 70
is
SHP I J- t
50 6
-Z Z
i -Y15 m
I 0 Soo 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 6000 6500 5000'0
U.S. GPM
ti
EXISTING PUMP NO.3
APPENDIX F
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION 1CT5
OF ORANGE COUNTY
a
1 ! [ ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 i f 1 i 1
FAIRBANKS-MORSE SERIES 5700
PERFORMANCE
1
140 20 t
NPSHR
21
{{(�
120 ;w
1 N _
W I I ri
top _..�_..
LL 01
2
e MODEL 5713
_ 79 705 RPM
J
80
II
M :. B 200
NP r-•26 ..
.•i' ..�.... ..._t.._.. _ _
100
2LOG � .�
� . 1 R
0 1000 20M 2000 4WD 7000 0000 70M 8000
U.S.GPM
APPENDIX F
ALTERNATIVE 1: SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
NEW PUMPS 1 THROUGH 5 SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
r
I
NPSNR 70
_.___......_ .... _.
r 35
200 0 z
r W 150�177
10.00
EXISTING IMPELLER
z o 6s 7U PUMP NO.2
.. . ___'_—.. .____. . . .._ MODEL
0 )S 8
r Z 100 80 B1 81 5415/8
80
18- 7s-70 1100 RPM
so
i
r p '
j 8XP 18.00 150
100 ,
16.00 t
r 50 m
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
r U.S. GPM
r
r
r
r
ALTERNATIVE 2:
REFURBISHED PUMPS
r 1 THROUGH 5
APPENDIX F
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
r
50
.___..._...__.._.. ... _._L
- - - =
- --- ._._...... .... _.._ :..__:.._......
_........_.._...._.._.._...:.:.::....i-L=G'i::. ...... ... .._.. ...._::::t- :=f= MODEL
.
Lam... .. - .mot..---._ _�__.._....... 5415/10
O3::::f BTO RPM
_
_..___ - .. -. .....-... .-.� m
r.
so
0 1000 5000 3000 4000 9000 6100 0
US. GPM
r
r
ALTERNATIVE 3:
REFURBISH PUMPS 1 THROUGH 5
ALTERNATIVE 4:
NEW PUMPS 1 THROUGH 5
APPENDIX F
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF SA ORANGE COUNTY
w
( 1 f 1 1 1 f 1 l 1 { l [ { l 1 ( 1
FAIRBANKS-MORSE SERIES 5700
PERFORMANCE
� 1 I
iM }1� IIIPSHRII ( I, 70I 4
I �jI(11 I I I• T � 1 - 1 -� 1 I 10 Z
O Z
Ip
Ij 1 �I80. . I II
tt � 44 ;
1W
MODEL 5713
79 1 i I: 705 RPM
1 .
r ;
Ilj I I � III li I I,.
40
200
1.. 4l 4 i I. loo
3
l
O 1000 1000 3000 4000 6000 am 7000 am
U.S.GPM
APPENDIX F
SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
V
J
rl
APPENDIX G
CSDOC PUMP STATION RELIABILITY ANALYSIS
v
r
rJ
r
y REFERENCES
1 CSDOC Master Plan- 1989 by Carollo-Boyle Engineers.
2 CSDOC Design and Construction Requirements for Sanitary Sewers- 1987
3 Wildan Report-Study and Recommendations for Exchange of Service Areas Between
County Sanitation Districts Nos.3 and 11.
FORB rn.AE
1. V = 1.486 R2/e S1/2
s n
for D of.75 R= .302 d
a
2. Q = K Ds/a Si/2 x .646 MGD
n Cis
for D of.75 K= .91
a
3. Power Cost = Q x h x .746 x $0.06 x 365
3960 x.7
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN Q'
MAY 9, 1990
1) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING
DIRECTORS.
LAST MONTH, TWO OF OUR BOARD MEMBERS RETIRED FROM THEIR
POSTS.
OVER THE YEARS, THESE DIRECTORS HAVE NOT ONLY PERFORMED
THEIR DUTIES AS CITY COUNCIL AND SANITARY DISTRICT MEMBERS WITH A
HIGH DEGREE OF PROFESSIONALISM AND DEDICATION, BUT THEY HAVE ALSO
BEEN EQUALLY INVOLVED IN THE WASTEWATER DUALITY PROGRAM OF THE
SANITATION DISTRICTS.
I WOULD THEREFORE LIKE TO INTRODUCE FOR THE BOARDS'
CONSIDERATION, ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS EXPRESSING OUR
APPRECIATION TO THESE RETIRING DIRECTORS AND RECOGNIZING THEIR
OUTSTANDING CONSTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE.
RESOLUTION
NO. DIRECTOR'S NAME CITY/AGENCY DISTRICTS)
90-39 URSULA KENNEDY TUSTIN 14
90-40 BOB PERRY GARDEN GROVE 2
SANITARY DISTRICT
- ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE -
-1-
. v
2) RECOGNITION OF ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL FIRMS RECENTLY
PRESENTED WITH AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE BY THE CALIFORNIA WATER
POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION.
AT ITS ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN APRIL, THE CALIFORNIA WATER
POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION RECOGNIZED THREE ORANGE COUNTY
INDUSTRIES FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS IN PROMOTING WASTEWATER
QUALITY, FOR CONSISTENTLY MEETING THEIR DISCHARGE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS, AND FOR SERVING AS A MODEL FOR OTHER INDUSTRIES IN
CONTROLLING, MANAGING AND REDUCING HAZARDOUS WASTES.
NOMINATED BY THE DISTRICTS' SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION, TWO OF
THESE FIRMS, OMNI METAL FINISHING AND HIXSON METAL FINISHING,
BOTH LOCATED IN DISTRICT 6, WERE AWARDED THE CWPCA CERTIFICATE OF
MERIT FOR MAINTAINING AN EXCELLENT RECORD OF PERMIT COMPLIANCE,
INDUSTRIAL WASTE SOURCE CONTROL AND WASTE MINIMIZATION.
THIS YEAR'S SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LARGE PLANT-OF-THE-YEAR
AWARD WAS PRESENTED TO ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS, LOCATED IN
DISTRICT 2. FOLLOWING THE INSTALLATION OF AN ON-SITE TREATMENT
PLANT AND ANAEROBIC DIGESTER, ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS WAS ABLE TO
REDUCE THE BOD IN THEIR EFFLUENT BY OVER 80%. IN ADDITION, THEY
ARE NOW ABLE TO UTILIZE 300,000 CUBIC FEET PER DAY OF METHANE
GAS, PRODUCED IN THEIR ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS, AS A SUPPLEMENTAL
SOURCE OF FUEL FOR THEIR PROCESS DRYERS. THEY ALSO HAVE
CONSISTENTLY BEEN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THEIR WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
PERMIT.
- ITEM 2 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE -
-2-
I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MR. VICTOR SALAZAR TO STEP FORWARD AND
BE RECOGNIZED FOR OMNI METAL FINISHING'S CERTIFICATE OF MERIT.
SIMILARLY, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MR. JIMMY KNIGHT TO STEP
FORWARD AND BE RECOGNIZED FOR HIXSON METAL FINISHING'S
CERTIFICATE OF MERIT.
DAVID WADE, PLANT MANAGER
I'D LIKE TO ASK MR. BENliff ARelERw ""--__EN+ OF ANAHEIM
CITRUS PRODUCTS, TO STEP FORWARD AND BE RECOGNIZED AS THE 1989
WINNER OF THE CWPCA'S LARGE PLANT-OF-THE-YEAR AWARD.
I KNOW I SPEAK FOR THE ENTIRE BOARD WHEN I SAY THAT YOUR
EFFORTS ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED AND YOU ARE TO BE CONGRATULATED
AND COMMENDED FOR YOUR EFFORTS.
(NOTE: ASK RECIPIENTS IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS. )
3) GENERAL MANAGER ELECTED VICE PRESIDENT OF AMSA BOARD
I AM PLEASED TO REPORT TO YOU THAT THE ASSOCIATION OF
METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES RECENTLY HELD THEIR ANNUAL MEETING
IN HOUSTON AND OUR GENERAL MANAGER WAS ELECTED VICE PRESIDENT OF THE
ASSOCIATION. _
AMSA IS VERY CTIVE IN LEGISLATIVE. REGULATORY AND TECHNICAL
ISSUES AT THE NATIO L LEVEL WITH OFFICES IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
FOR THE INFORMAT N OF THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE RELATIVELY NEW
MEMBERS OF THE SANITATI DISTRICTS' BOARDS. WAYNE IS ALSO A PAST
PRESIDENT OF THE CALIFORN ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES.
CASH IS SIMILAR TO AMS BUT AT THE STATE LEVEL.
WAYNE ALSO SERVES CURREN LY ON TRI-TAC AND, IN FACT, IS R
PAST CHAIRMAN.
TRI-TAC IS A TECHNICAL ADVI RY COMMITTEE TO THE STATE
REGULATORY AGENCIES. IT IS COMPRI D OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM
CASA AS WELL AS THE CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL
ASSOCIATION AND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFOR A CITIES.
- ITEM 4 ON NEXT P GE -
-3-
4) COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
BECAUSE OF RECENT TURNOVER IN BOARD MEMBERSHIP THERE HAVE
u BEEN VACANCIES CREATED ON SOME OF THE BOARD COMMITTEES.
I WOULD, THEREFORE, LIKE TO ANNOUNCE THE FOLLOWING
APPOINTMENTS:
- HANK WEDAA TO CHAIR THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND
REUSE COMMITTEE
- WAYNE WEDIN TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE: AND
- ROBERT MAIN AND PHIL SANSONE TO THE SPECIAL REORGANIZATION
COMMITTEE
5) UPCOMING MEETINGS
A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY,
MAY 16TH, AT 5:30 P.M.
B. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE -
THE EXECUTIVE AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES ARE
SCHEDULED TO MEET JOINTLY ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 23RD, AT
5:30 P.M.
C. JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE JOINT 'WORKS
SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON
WEDNESDAY, MAY 23RD, AT 7:30 P.M. , IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWING THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING
D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE -
THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, MAY 31ST, AT 5:30 P.M.
- END OF REPORT -
-4-
MEETING DATE May 91 1990 TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,$,6.7,11,19 & 14
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS 1k9 #iy!f- sL N$
(YOUNG)....... GRISET .. y (AGE)....................ARNOLD...... 00. O— 0...
(EDGAR)......W PUCKETT .... (GREEN)..................BANNISTER... ✓ ✓
(ROTH).........5 � (WEDAR)..................B I CONGER.... �G ✓
(CRANK)....... AHNER. CApY�G_ (HORSY)..................CATLIN...... �� ✓
X� (PLUMMER)................COX.........Je= _TG ✓
DISTRICT 2 (MAIN)...................CULVER......� �� ✓
(PUCKETT)................EDGAR.......JL _� ✓
(MEDAA)........BIGONGER....JZ_ _ (MAHONEY)................GRAHAM......�G _� ✓
(SCOTT)......�NEALe......... _ (CHESSER)................GRIFFIN.....
.. �G _� ✓
(NORBY)...... CATL N......_�_ (YOUNG)..................GRISET......�G �� ✓
(YOUNG)........GRISET...... (PLUMMER)................HART........�L y ✓
(GRAHAM).......WAM HEY..... _ _ (GRAHAM).................MAHONEY.....�L ✓
(CULVER).......MAIN........JG_ _ (CULVER).................MAIN........�G _� ✓
(WEDIN)........NELSON........ _ (SILVA)..................fMYB........ —� ✓
(ECKENROOE). . (SCOTT)........
( U .. S A (WEDIN)..................
.NELSON
......
L(SALOARINI). .. (ECKENROOE)......... .NEWTON......
(BARBERA)...
...SMITH...... (HUNTER)............
.... PICKLER.....a�LG �J�CC� ✓✓✓
_� ✓
(ROTH).........STANTON...... (HART)...................PLUMMER..... JG ✓
(MINER)..................POLIS....... y/ ✓
DISTRICT 3 (EDGAR)..................PONTESUS ..._
(EDGAR)..................PUCKETT.....JG 7 ✓
(WIDEN)...... POLIS ..... (STANTON)................AR;. ........ — —
(MEDIN)........ N...... (COX)....................SA NTONE..... ✓
(AGE)..........ARNOLD...... (AGRAN)..................SHERIDAN.... �� ✓
(GREEN)........BANNISTER... (WILES)..................5[EFEN...... ✓
(NORBY)........CA TLlN......;L (SALDARINI)..............3[LiEI...... [y
(PERRY)........CULVER....... _ _ (BARRERA)................SMITH.......JG ✓
(MAHONEY)......GRAHAM......JG _ — (ROTH)...................STANTON..... . JC ✓
(CHESSEN)......GRIFFIN..... (MILLER).................BMAIh........ JG ✓
(YOUNG)........GR ISET...... (WAHLSTROM)..............SYLVIA......� �G ✓
(SCOTT)........NEAL........ (ALLEN)..................VERELLEN....� _h ✓
(HUNTER).......qq ICKLER.....JC (CRANK/FERRYMAN/GREEN)...MANNER...... JC ✓
(WILES).......�SIEFEN)....... _ (BIGONGER)...............NEDRA.......�G _� ✓
(ROTH).........333 TANTON........ _ (NELSON).................WEDIN.......�_ �� ✓
(MAHLSTROM)....SYLVIA...... _ (GRGAS)..................WILSON......JG
(ALLEN)........VERELLEN.... (GREEN)..................NINCHELL.._.a — Je! ✓
(GRGAS)........WILSON.......
DISTRICT 5
(PLUMIER)...
. HART ..`... ✓
(COX)......... SONES....sC _ — STAFF:
(STANTON)......ROPPM........JL_ SYLVESTER... ✓
BROWN.......
DISTRICT 6 ANDERSON....1�2
CLAWSON.....y
(FERRYMAN).... W ✓ DAWES.......JG
(HART)........ LUMME .... HODGES......
(STANTON)...... KYLE........JG
LINDER......�G
DISTRICT 7 NICHOLS.....
OOTEN.......JC
(BARRERA)..... SMIT ..... ✓ STREED......�G
(PLUMMER).... ...... ✓ —_ VINCENT.....�G
(PLUMMER)......COX......... VON LANGEN i
(YOUNG)........GRISET......JG _ _ WINSOR......�G
(STANTON)......Re......... 1G �AAQ.Ow�
(ABRAM)........SHERIDAN....JC
(GREEN)........MAHNER......_SC_ _ WOODRUFF.... ✓
DISTRICT 11 IDE....... ..
ANWAR.......
(SILVA)...... _Jl _ _ DEMIR.......y
(GREEN)....... INCHEL .. ✓_ _ FLEMING.....
(ROTH)........ I P..... ✓_ _ HOHENER....._�
HOUGH.......
DISTRICT 13 HOWARD......��
•� HUNT........
(BIGONGER)....ciilizf..... . KNOPF.......
(HUNTER).......PICKLER..... . LINDSTROM..._
(STANTON)......N6iN......... LYNCH.......
(SARRERA)......SMITH.......JC _ _ STONE.......
(NELSON)......(`NEDTN',.....= WASON.......
YOUNG.......
DISTRICT 14 �(� calk
YWiAY (MILLER)...... ✓
(EDGAR)........ .......� V
(STANTON)..... RBTH....
(AGRAN)......jSHERIDAI{>.
05/09/(BARRERAT...... WITH.......
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
MAY 9, 1990 BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM
Please Print Please Print
'Avi7lsJA,
�qH(r¢ D S<9/ "r•.�r o.r(r r i*tc�l �',..rr�, .�.
Tw S hC^r-
wIL(. IT-TER
( 6T02 14 Jq 44 /L. QlN All tirA �- iNS�iN
f>� i onr
r) t
F31
5-09-90 JOINT MEETING NOTES
a/ 83 - Receive & file minute excerpts
Director Culver introduced new Director Bob Main and Dick Edgar introduced new
Director Charles (Chuck) Puckett.
M4 - Election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tem
DISTRICT 1 - James Wahner nominated for Chairman. Moved & seconded that
nominations be closed. Charles Puckett nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved
and seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 2 - Iry Pickler nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nom�s be closed. Roland Bigonger and James Neal nominated for Chairman
pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Directors voted by a
show of hands. James Neal elected Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 3 - Richard Polls nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nominations be closed. Bob Siefen nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and
seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 5 - Evelyn Hart nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nomi�s be closed. Phil Sansone nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and
seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 6 - Ruthelyn Plummer nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nomm naETo—ns be closed. James Wahner nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and
seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 7 - Don Smith nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nominations be closed. Sally Anne Sheridan nominated for Chairman pro tem.
Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Later in meeting reopened
nominations. Sally Anne withdrew from nominations, and Richard Edgar was
nominated and elected Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 11 - Grace Winchell nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nomi� be closed. Tom Mays nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and
seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 13 - Henry Wedaa nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nominaFfons be closed. Wayne Wedin nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and
seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 14 - Peer Swan nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nomi� be closed. Sally Anne Sheridan nominated for Chairman pro tem.
Moved and seconded that nominations be closed.
Chairman Polls noted that Director Paul Verellen would be retiring after this
meeting as he is moving from Stanton to Irvine.
H6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman
�./
SEE ATTACHED REPORT. Adopted Resolutions of appreciation for retiring Directors
Ursula Kennedy (Reso. No. 90-39) and Bob Perry (Reso. No. 90-40).
5/09/90
With regard to CWPCA's Certificate of Merit presented to Omni Metal Finishing,
Mr. Victor Salazar expressed appreciation to Directors and CWPCA for the
recognition and gave a special thanks to his employees for the great job they
�.s have done. Several employees also came forward to be recognized.
David Wade, Plant Manager of Anaheim Citrus, accepted CWPCA's Large-Plant-of-
the-Year award and expressed their appreciation. He briefly explained the steps
they had taken to correct their system and how their process worked now.
66(b) - Report of the General Manager - No report
06(c) Report of the General Counsel
The General Counsel reported on two memos in the Directors' folders relative to
claims. Cravens, Dargen 8 Company is an old claim that has been settled and the
memo was just for the Directors' information. He then reported on the second
memorandum relative to Universal Circuits, Inc. The Districts obtained a ruling
from Superior Court a week ago upholding the decision of the Executive Committee
in making a finding relative to non-renewal of the industrial waste permit of
Universal Circuits at their existing facility.
Tom Woodruff added that he received a FAX from the counsel of UCI offering a
proposal for resolution of (1) the lawsuit they initiated; (2) the lawsuit we
initiated; and (3) issuance of new permit for their new building that is nearly
completed in Santa Ana. Their application for a permit has been denied by the
General Manager. It will be before the Executive Committee later this month.
He said he hadn't had an opportunity to evaluate the proposal yet in order to
make any recommendations. He will need to meet with the Districts' technical
staff and will report to the Executive Committee on the May 23rd.
Director Culver asked, since the judgment upheld the Districts' decision, why
didn't the judge have them pay the General Counsel 's costs also? Tom explained
that there is no provision that expressly provides for the prevailing party to
obtain payment of attorney's fees unless it is contractually provided between
the two parties. There are some exceptions but this is not one of them.
Director Wedaa asked, since there are three outstanding points, is TLW's fees
and this payment issue negotiable? Mr. Woodruff stated that he would prefer to
comment on that in closed session if the Directors wanted to discuss it. Will
bring this to the Executive Committee and will consider a lot of issues then.
It is certainly possible. Will bring it up at Executive Committee meeting.
Director Polis asked if they are shut down now? Mr. Woodruff answered no. They
are anxious to move to new facility but the Order signed by Judge Weeks is kind
of unusual. If they file an appeal , the restraining order is dissolved until
the end of the appeal period. They are still doing business.
#13 - Long-range Financial Plan update
The General Manager reported that last year the Boards approved a 30-year Master
Plan. Volume 8 was the Financial Plan of the 02020 Vision° plan. As part of
the annual budget process, we have updated that Financial Plan and presented
recommendations to the Directors on user fees and connection fees. He then
reviewed the current fee schedules. Mr. Sylvester noted that the staff's
summary report was included with the agenda mailing.
-2-
5/09/90
Gary Streed, the Director of Finance, then addressed the Boards. He advised
that as part of the budget process, since 1987 staff has been reviewing and
planning for the next 10 years. Have known for many years which Districts would
have financial deficits in the late 1980's and early 1990's. He reviewed past
and anticipated deficits. In the past the Districts received grant funds. That
program has been discontinued.
He further reported on capital facilities connection fees. It is a one-time fee
issued when a building permit is issued. Last year we proposed a change in the
way the fee is calculated to include future, as well as exisitng, facilities.
The Master Plan proposes this be adopted annually. It is a very small
adjustment this year--$10. Each District has the same connection fees at this
time. It would be difficult to have cities collect different fees for different
Districts. Connection fees are for new capacity.
With regard to user fees, referred to cash flows included with Directors agenda
material . Briefly reviewed schedules. They are prepared in accordance with
Financial Plan section of the Master Plan. Figures are based on renewal of the
Districts' NPDES Permit. Will probably be two years before we know if permit
will be renewed.
He then commented on issuance of debt. Over the next 10 years all Districts
except Districts 13 and 14 will issue some form of debt to meet capital needs.
Another reason to issue debt is to smooth increases in user fees. Would be
$250-300 per unit next year but debt could allow that increase to go slowly over
a period of time. Debt is included in cash flows.
Industrial firms pay additional fees. Some as high as $700,000-800,000 per
year.
The Director of Finance stated that the actions before the Boards that evening
were to adopt increases in user fees and connection fees. Will review those
fees next year again. These fees are submitted annually to the State Water
Resources Control Board for their review also.
No questions.
Joint Chairman Catlin stated that he had asked the Director of Finance from his
city (Fullerton) to review this report and recomendations. His comment had been
that CSDOC had obviously done a very thorough analysis. He concurred with the
statements of the Districts' Director of Finance. Bath increases are warranted
based on the Master Plan.
#14(a)(2) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11&13 - Report of General Counsel re Connection
Fee rd nances
TLW reported that these ordinances were introduced for first reading at last
month's meeting. No changes. If ordinances are adopted, takes 60 days to
become effective and, therefore, does not become effective until July 11th.
Ma 2 - DISTRICTS 1 3 5 6 11&13 - Report of General Counsel re User Fee
inances
TLW reported that Districts 2, 7 and 14 do not have user fees. Introduced
ordinances for six Districts at the last meeting. No changes since
introduction. Ordinances establish user fees in accordance with schedules
included with agenda material.
-3-
5/09/90
#33 (a) - Staff report re Districts 3 8 11 facilities
Tom Dawes reported on the Slater Avenue Pump Station capacity. He also reviewed
District 11's ownership and capacity in the Knott Interceptor. It would be more
economical to build a new pump station then to complete the Coast Trunk Sewer
through the Bolsa Chica bluffs. Reveiwed new interceptor facilities required to
be built.
He noted that Districts 3 and 11 have shared capacities for a number of years.
Cities are assigned ownership based on those capacity needs. A certain amount
of capacity is proposed to be sold to District 3 and District 11 needs to buy
capacity in District 3's lines. The net result will be District 3 will pay
District 11 $631,000 for capacity in existing lines.
Need to rebuild the Slater Pump Station and make sure that District 3 and 11
both own the new pump station and share in the construction cost to accordance
with capacities--83WX owned by District 11 and the remainder by District 3.
He then showed a slide of the present pump station and a picture of the proposed
new pump station. Construction of the pump station, influent lines and
discharge facilities are the first priority. Cost is about $7.5 million.
($1.0+ million for District 3 and the remainder for District 11). The
cost-sharing formula is in resolution to be adopted that night.
Re Bolsa Chica area, it has never annexed to the District. We have worked with
Signal to develop an annexation agreement to provide sewer capacity for that
area. The District has never received any money for the Bolsa Chica area. If
the pump station was built for this area, it would be a larger size and at a
larger cost. We are building these facilities to meet the cities' master plans.
A few weeks ago, Bolsa Chica indicated that they are not interested right now in
an annexation agreement. We decided we would therefore build smaller size
facilities and won't provide for capacity for them. We will not have the
benefit of getting some of their money up front. In the end we will get it
someday. TMD reviewed the annexation charges and connection charges. These
charges will be exactly the same even if they don't cone into the Slater system.
The Director of Engineering reviewed the agenda items before the Directors.
Director Neal asked how much money we were talking about between the smaller and
larger pipe without Signal? TMD replied that the initial project was $750,000.
Cost would go down about 10%. Would be about $3-4 million savings later. He
noted that Henley acquired Signal Oil and therein came their change in heart.
Director Pickler asked, does the City of Huntington Beach have any say? Tom
advised that they are not yet within the City. Are in the sphere of influence.
Asked if we had talked to H.B. and TMD replied yes.
Director Siefen asked why we were going to reduce the capacity if they don't
annex now as eventually, they will develop the area. Seems a little short
sighted. Will potentially need the capacity. Tom Dawes advised that that is
what we are trying to get a handle on. It seems wrong to not build that
capacity in. The thinking that led us to this course of action is that it is
hard to ask people right now to pay for Signal 's future capacity. Polls asked
if they would be paying later? TMD replied that they could lay lines through
Bolsa Chica and get into the Coast Trunk Sewer.
-4-
5/09/90
Tom Woodruff then stated that if the property were to annex to the District,
then we are faced with the question of duty to serve. Essentially, we probably
do have a duty to serve if they are within the District. First issue is whether
you are going to accept them for annexation. Probably couldn't force District
to annex them.
Polls asked if we build now or later, do they have to go through the Slater
Pump Station? TMD advised that if Slater Pump Station is built to the smaller
size, they will go to the Coast Trunk.
Pickler asked, will we need the bigger size without Signal? TMD said staff
couldn't recommend sizing to accommodate Signal .
Siefen asked, what about the Conservancy group? TMD said staff had met with
them many times but they are not aware of the most recent decision. He added
that he didn't think there was any doubt that the annexation will go through
eventually.
Winchell commented that she would really hate to see Directors take a position
that would let Signal off the hook. Thought they need to be told strongly it is
their obligation to pay the money up front for capacity for them. Tom Woodruff
stated that we can set the capacity the staff and Directors deem appropriate and
necessary. If you want to go larger, it is permissible. Winchell added that if
we take this action tonight, it would just give them the message. Culver said he
somewhat agreed. Who is going to put up the front money if they don't?
District 3 & 11?
The General Manager explained that the Financial Plan discussed earlier includes
issuance of debt to finance capital facilities. What it would mean if you
decide to build capacity for Bolsa Chica without an annexation agreement is you
would be paying money out of your own pocket for someone who is not yet a member
of the club. The District would have to borrow more money and rate payers
within the District would have to be paying for capacity to serve this area
sometime in the future.
Pickler stated that he didn't think we should wait on Signal. If they have to,
they will just have to go to the Coast Trunk Sewer. Think we should go with
plans.
Mr. Sylvester advised that staff has written a letter to Signal setting forth in
no uncertain terms their proposal and what the situation is. We have given them
until May 15th so will report back at the next meeting.
Siefen said he had changed his opinion and agreed with Winchell . We should say
that they are stuck with the Coast Trunk Sewer.
The General Manager advised that none of the Board actions requested that night
were decisions re capacity.
Culver asked how much Signal would pay? TMD advised $1.8 million for
annexation fees plus connection fees of $2,280 per unit for 5,000 homes equaling
$10 million.
Polls wandered if this item should be continued. The General Manager reiterated
that staff was not asking for a decision on this capacity issue tonight.
Actions were just to receive and file report, and approve agreement re exchange
of capacity between Districts 3 and 11. The decision on final design and sizing
will come back at a future date.
-5-
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
MAY 9, 1990
1) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING
DIRECTORS.
LAST MONTH, TWO OF OUR BOARD MEMBERS RETIRED FROM THEIR
POSTS.
OVER THE YEARS, THESE DIRECTORS HAVE NOT ONLY PERFORMED
THEIR DUTIES AS CITY COUNCIL AND SANITARY DISTRICT MEMBERS WITH A
HIGH DEGREE OF PROFESSIONALISM AND DEDICATION, BUT THEY HAVE ALSO
BEEN EQUALLY INVOLVED IN THE WASTEWATER QUALITY PROGRAM OF THE
SANITATION DISTRICTS.
I WOULD THEREFORE LIKE TO INTRODUCE FOR THE BOARDS'
CONSIDERATION, ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS EXPRESSING OUR
APPRECIATION TO THESE RETIRING DIRECTORS AND RECOGNIZING THEIR
OUTSTANDING CONSTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE.
RESOLUTION
NO. DIRECTOR'S NAME CITY/AGENCY DISTRICT(S)
90-39 URSULA KENNEDY TUSTIN 14
90-40 BOB PERRY GARDEN GROVE 2
SANITARY DISTRICT
- ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE -
-I-
2) RECOGNITION OF ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL FIRMS RECENTLY
PRESENTED WITH AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE BY THE CALIFORNIA WATER
POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION.
AT ITS ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN APRIL, THE CALIFORNIA WATER
POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION RECOGNIZED THREE ORANGE COUNTY
INDUSTRIES FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS IN PROMOTING WASTEWATER
QUALITY, FOR CONSISTENTLY MEETING THEIR DISCHARGE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS. AND FOR SERVING AS A MODEL FOR OTHER INDUSTRIES IN
CONTROLLING, MANAGING AND REDUCING HAZARDOUS WASTES.
NOMINATED BY THE DISTRICTS' SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION, TWO OF
THESE FIRMS, OMNI METAL FINISHING AND HIXSON METAL FINISHING,
BOTH LOCATED IN DISTRICT 6, WERE AWARDED THE CWPCA CERTIFICATE OF
MERIT FOR MAINTAINING AN EXCELLENT RECORD OF PERMIT COMPLIANCE,
INDUSTRIAL WASTE SOURCE CONTROL AND WASTE MINIMIZATION.
THIS YEAR'S SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LARGE PLANT-OF-THE-YEAR
AWARD WAS PRESENTED TO ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS, LOCATED IN
DISTRICT 2. FOLLOWING THE INSTALLATION OF AN ON-SITE TREATMENT
PLANT AND ANAEROBIC DIGESTER, ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS WAS ABLE TO
REDUCE THE BOD IN THEIR EFFLUENT BY OVER 8OZ. IN ADDITION, THEY
ARE NOW ABLE TO UTILIZE 300,000 CUBIC FEET PER DAY OF METHANE
GAS, PRODUCED IN THEIR ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS, AS A SUPPLEMENTAL
SOURCE OF FUEL FOR THEIR PROCESS DRYERS. THEY ALSO HAVE
CONSISTENTLY BEEN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THEIR WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
PERMIT.
- ITEM 2 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE -
-2-
I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MR. VICTOR SALAZAR TO STEP FORWARD AND
BE RECOGNIZED FOR OMNI METAL FINISHING'S CERTIFICATE OF MERIT.
SIMILARLY. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MR. JIMMY KNIGHT TO STEP
FORWARD AND BE RECOGNIZED FOR HIXSON METAL FINISHING'S
CERTIFICATE OF MERIT.
DAVID WADE, PLANT MANAGER
I 'D LIKE TO ASK MR. "_""_- ."Re'1=". PRES* OF ANAHEIM
CITRUS PRODUCTS, TO STEP FORWARD AND BE RECOGNIZED AS THE 1989
WINNER OF THE CWPCA'S LARGE PLANT-OF-THE-YEAR AWARD.
I KNOW I SPEAK FOR THE ENTIRE BOARD WHEN I SAY THAT YOUR
EFFORTS ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED AND YOU ARE TO BE CONGRATULATED
AND COMMENDED FOR YOUR EFFORTS.
(NOTE: ASK RECIPIENTS IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS. )
3) GENERAL MANAGER ELECTED VICE PRESIDENT OF AMSA BOARD
I AM PLEASED TO REPORT TO YOU THAT THE ASSOCIATION OF
METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES RECENTLY HELD THEIR ANNUAL MEETING
IN HOUSTON AND OUR GENERAL MANAGER WAS ELECTED VICE PRESIDENT OF THE
ASSOCIATION.
AMSA IS VERY ACTIVE IN LEGISLATIVE, REGULATORY AND TECHNICAL
ISSUES AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL WITH OFFICES IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
FOR THE INFORMATION OF THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE RELATIVELY NEW
MEMBERS OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS' BOARDS, WAYNE IS ALSO A PAST
PRESIDENT OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES.
CASA IS SIMILAR TO AMSA, BUT AT THE STATE LEVEL.
WAYNE ALSO SERVES CURRENTLY ON TRI-TAC AND, IN FACT, IS A
PAST CHAIRMAN.
TRI-TAC IS A TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THE STATE
REGULATORY AGENCIES. IT IS COMPRISED OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM
CASA AS WELL AS THE CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL
ASSOCIATION AND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES.
- ITEM 4 ON NEXT PAGE -
-3-
4) COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
BECAUSE OF RECENT TURNOVER IN BOARD MEMBERSHIP THERE HAVE
BEEN VACANCIES CREATED ON SOME OF THE BOARD COMMITTEES.
I WOULD, THEREFORE, LIKE TO ANNOUNCE THE FOLLOWING
APPOINTMENTS:
- HANK WEDAA TO CHAIR THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND
REUSE COMMITTEE
- WAYNE WEDIN TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE; AND
- ROBERT MAIN AND PHIL SANSONE TO THE SPECIAL REORGANIZATION
COMMITTEE
5) UPCOMING MEETINGS
A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY,
MAY 16TH, AT 5:30 P.M.
B. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE -
THE EXECUTIVE AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES ARE
SCHEDULED TO MEET JOINTLY ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 23RD, AT
5:30 P.M.
C. JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE JOINT WORKS
SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON
WEDNESDAY, MAY 23RD, AT 7:30 P.M. , IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWING THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING
D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE -
THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, MAY 31ST, AT 5:30 P.M.
- END OF REPORT -
-4-
a
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 39 59 69 79 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
MAY ld, 1990
. R„1 SPaP°t ma,O��ITT
n
U D e m
wa
Q 81aea 19A
E COO
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
�..r
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, S. S. 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on May 9, 1990, at
7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance
and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, B, 7, 11, 13 and 34 as follows:
`v ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT MO. l: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Orma Crank
=Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tam --Richard B. Edgar
=Dan Griset Dan Young
=Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickier, Chairman Fred Hunter
=James Neal, Chairman pro tem —George Scott
=Roland E. Bigonger —Henry W. Wetlaa
x A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Norby
x Dan Griset _can Young
x William D. Mahoney __Beth Graham
=Robert H. Main Norman Culver
=Garrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
=Arthur G. Newton _Norman Z. Eckenrode
a Wayne Silzel _Harold Saldarini
=Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
=Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairmen Eva G. Miner
=J.N. "Bob" Siefen, Chairmen pro tem —Dewey Wiles
a Margaret M. _
. Arnoltl Cecilia L. Age
7--Wes Bannister —Peter Green
x A.B. 'Buck- Catlin __Chris Moray
7—Norman Culver _Robert H. Main
x Beth Graham _William D. Mahoney
=Don R. Griffin _Donna L. Chessen
=Dan Griset _Dan Young
x James Neal George Scott
=Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
=Iry Pickier Fred Hunter
=Roger Stanton Dan R. Roth
=Charles Sylvia —_Robert Wahlstrom
=Paul Verellen Edward L. Allen
z Edna Wilson _Victor Grgas
DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chai men Ruthetyn Plummer
=Phil Sansone, Chairman pro two —John C. Cox, Jr.
_Don R. Roth z Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chai man _Evelyn Hart
=James Wanner, Chairman pro Lem James M. Ferryman
_Don R. Roth %Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chat men Fred Barrera
=Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tan —_Charles E. Puckett
=John C. Cox, Jr. _Ruthetyn Plummer
=_Dan Griset Dan Young
Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton
=Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran
x James Wanner =Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winthell, Chairman Peter Green
Tom Mays, Chairman pro tam =Jim Silva
=Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Wetlaa, Chai men Roland E. Bigonger
=Wayne Wedin, Chairman pro tam _Garrey Nelson
x Iry Pickier Fred Hunter
Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton
=Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
DISTRICT NO. 14: Peer A. Swan, Chairman x Darryl Miller
=Sally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tem Larry Agran
\rr l _Leslie A. Pontious =Richard B. Edgar
Don R. Roth =_Roger Stanton
=Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
2
05/09/90
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Thomas
M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne
Clawson, Mark Esquer, Penny Kyle, John �..✓
Linder, Rory Nelson, Bob Ooten, Jack
Vincent, Rich von Langen, Chuck Winsor
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Jamel Demir, Conrad Hohener, Walt
Howard, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, Jimney
Knight, David Wade, Ramiro Salazar,
Jose A. Salazar, Don Willet, Victor
M. Salazar, Ray Byerley, Tom
Richardson, Steve Dworkin
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excer is
from the Garden Grove Sanitary That the minute excerpts from the
District and the ulty or lustin re Garden Grove Sanitary District and the
Board appointments - City of Tustin re appointment of
alternate Directors and seating new
members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as
follows: (*Mayor)
Agency District Active Director Alternate Director
Garden Grove 2 Robert H. Main Norman E. Culver
Sanitary Dist.
City of Tustin 1 Charles E. Puckett Richard B. Edgar*
7 Richard B. Edgar* Charles E. Puckett
14 Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar*
DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
hairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1.
It was then moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the
vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Wahner as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Charles E. Puckett be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other
nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot
for Director Puckett as Chairman pro tem. _
-3-
' 05/09/90
DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tam of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2.
It was then moved: That Director Iry Pickier be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Pickler as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Directors Roland Bigonger and James Neal be
nominated as candidates for the office of Chairman pro tem. The vote was
then polled by a show of hands, following which the Secretary announced that
Director Neal had been elected Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which -
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations In order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3.
It was then moved: That Director Richard T. Polls be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the
vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Polls as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director J. R. "Bob" Siefen be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other
nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot
for Director Siefen as Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5.
It was then moved: That Director Evelyn Hart be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hart as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Phil Sansone be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. -There being no other
nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot
for Director Sansone as Chairman pro tem.
-4-
05/09/90 '
DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6.
It was then moved: That Director Ruthelyn Plummer be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the
vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Plummer as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other
nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot
for Director Wahner as Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7.
It was then moved: That Director Don E. Smith be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Smith as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Sally Anne Sheridan be nominated for _
the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote
was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sheridan
as Chairman pro tem.
After a caucus by the Board, Director Sheridan withdrew from the post of
Chairman pro tem, following which Director Richard B. Edgar was duly
nominated and elected Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11.
It was then moved: That Director Grace Winchell be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winchell as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Tom Mays be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the
vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Mays as Chairman pro tem. ^
-5-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 13 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13.
It was then moved: That Director Henry W. Wedaa be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wedaa as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Dlrector Wayne Wedin be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the
vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Wedin as Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 14 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14.
It was then moved: That Director Peer A. Swan be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Swan as
Chai roan.
It was further moved: That Director Sally Anne Sheridan be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other
nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot
for Director Sheridan as Chairman pro tem.
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that
Adoption of Resolutions of Directors Ursula Kennedy and Bob Perry
Appreciation for retiring Directors had announced their retirement from the
Boards of Directors. Ursula Kennedy,
serving on the District 14 Board, has represented the City of Tustin for
approximately four years. Bob Perry has represented the Garden Grove
Sanitary District for the last 16 years on the District No. 2 Board.
The Joint Chairman then introduced resolutions expressing the Boards'
appreciation to these retiring Directors.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions
expressing their appreciation to the retiring Directors and recognizing
their outstanding contributions and dedication to public, service:
Resolution No. Director City/Agency District
90-39 Ursula Kennedy Tustin 14
90-40 Bob Perry Garden Grove Sanitary Dist. 2
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
-6-
05/09/90
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that at
eco ni ion o n us r a its annual conference in April , the
schar ers-- n Metal Finishin California Water Pollution Control
xson Metal n s in and Anaheim Association had presented awards of
Citrus ro uc s--for receivin excellence and certificates to three
PCA awards of excelience Orange County industrial firms. The
purpose of the awards is to stimulate
interest on the part of industry to take positive steps to meet strict water
pollution control standards. These firms, nominated by the Districts'
Industrial Waste Division inspectors, were recognized for their efforts over
the past year to comply with Districts' discharge requirements and foster an
awareness in the business community for the need to control industrial
wastewater to help protect public health and the environment.
The Joint Chairman then recognized Mr. Victor Salazar of Omni Metal
Finishing as well as several other employees from the firm, recipient of a
CWPCA Certificate of Merit; Mr. Jimmy Knight of Hixson Metal Finishing,
recipient of a CWPCA Certificate of Merit; and Mr. David Wade, Plant Manager
of Anaheim Citrus Products, recipient of CWPCA's Large Plant-of-the-Year
award. Chairman Catlin presented each of the industry representatives the
awards recognizing their exemplary performance.
On behalf of the Boards of Directors, Chairman Catlin commended the firms
and expressed the Boards' appreciation for their efforts.
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that
Report of the Joint Chairman the Districts' General Manager, Wayne
Sylvester, was recently elected Vice
President of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) at
their annual meeting in Houston. AMSA is very active in legislative,
regulatory and technical issues at the national level with offices in
Washington, D.C.
The Joint Chairman then noted that because of recent turnover in Board
membership, there have been vacancies created on some of the Boards'
Committees. Chairman Catlin announced the following appointments to various
Committees:
Director Committee Post
Henry Wedaa Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee Chairman
Wayne Wedin Fiscal Policy Committee Member
Robert Main Special Reorganization Committee Representative, District 2
Phil Sansone Special Reorganization Committee Representative, District 5
Joint Chairman Catlin then reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee was
scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 16th, at 5:30 p.m.
He also called a joint meeting of the Executive Committee and the Fiscal
Policy Committee for Wednesday, May 23rd, at 5:30 p.m..
Mr. Catlin further reported that a special Joint Works Selection Committee
meeting had been scheduled for Wednesday, May 23rd, immediately following
the joint Executive Committee/Fiscal Policy Committee meeting.
The Joint Chairman also advised that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, May 31st, at 5:30 p.m.
-7-
05/09/90
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly reported
Report of the General Counselon the settlement of a claim filed
several years ago by Cravens, Dargen a
Company as a result of a sewer backup in District 7.
He also reported on the status of pending litigation relative to Universal
Circuits, Inc. (UCI) concerning the Districts' decision not to renew the
Industrial waste discharge permit for their facility on Newport Circle in
Santa Ana. Mr. Woodruff advised that he had just received a proposal from
Universal Circuit's attorney relative to resolution of the lawsuits filed by
UCI and the Districts relative to the Newport Circle plant, as well as UCI 's
application for an industrial waste permit for their new facility currently
being constructed on South Yale in Santa Ana which the Districts had
recently denied. He noted that he had not yet had an opportunity to
evaluate the proposal but would report further on the matter at the
Executive Committee meeting scheduled for May 23rd.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
nor the adjourned regular meeting held April 18, 1990, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
.nor the adjourned regular meeting held April 5, 1990, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or
�..r Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-8-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of of nt
and Individual District Maims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts
so indicated.
4/11/90 4/25190
ALL DISTRICTS
JoUp—ating Fund - $ 564,949.79 $ 946,387.45
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 2,044,463.55 354,973.08
Joint Working Capital Fund - 212,846.74 186,375.58
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 13,922.72 11,743.17
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 338.00 135.72
DI TRISENCT 2 - 8,090.58 12,771.73
DISC - 18,459.41 3,384.51
DD TRIG - 5,808.77 7,539.74
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 230.71 9,197.99
DISDIS RI�fN77 - 16,126.40 82,380.68
DI TRS 1�N�11 - 4,319.12 6,749.59
DIDI TRIG - 38.00 -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 5,406.93 28,456.16
DI TRISCT NTS.5 & 6 JOINT - 24,599.59 3,058.81
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,274.67 11,519.63
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 2,035.92 3,690.44
2,923,9TO 1,668,36 .
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Video Inspection eryices
for Districts Sewers and Manholes, That the bid tabulation and
Decification No. - 4 , to PSS, Inc. recommendation re award of purchase
order contract for Video Inspection
Services for Districts' Sewers and Manholes, Specification No. S-045, be,
and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded
to PSS, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $164,786.00 for a two-year period
beginning May 15, 1990.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin Chan a Order No. 2 to t o
p ans and specifications for That Change Order No. 2to the plans
Jab No. P1-33 and specifications for Primary
Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an
addition of $21,371.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co.
for three items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
-9- �".�
05/09/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin Chan e r er o. 3 to the
tans antl s ecificat ons for That Change Order No. 3 to the plans
Job No. P1- -1 and specifications for Rehabilitation
of Digesters 7 and 8 at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1, authorizing an addition of $92,392.00 to the
contract with S. A. Healy Co. 6 Assoc. for seven items of additional work,
and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for completion of said
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovss one n ddendum o. to the
Profe Services A reement That the Selection Committee
w Boyle En ineerin Cor oration certification of the final negotiated
for design of JOD NO. J-17 fee relative to Addendum No. 2 to the
Professional Services Agreement with
Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Central Laboratory, Job
No. J-17, providing for wage escalations and construction
management/inspection services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed
and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 90-41, approving said Addendum No. 2 to the Agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation, for additional services on an hourly-rate basis for
labor plus overhead, for an additional amount not to exceed $6,438.00 for
wage escalations due to delays in the project, plus construction management/
inspection services at the rate of $80.00 per hour, including overhead and
profit, for a total amount not to exceed $156,160.00, increasing the total
authorized compensation from $329,105.00 to an amount not to exceed
$491,703.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby
with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for adopt Resolution No. 90-42, approving
technical and environmental support Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
services re 1989 Collection, Services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom,
Treatment and N osal Faciscilities Inc. for technical and environmental
Master Pan EIR and Ocean Dharge support services relative to the 1989
Permit renewal application Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan Environmental
Impact Report and Ocean Discharge Permit renewal application, providing for
a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no
change in the maximum authorized compensation of $304,000.00. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing ta General Manager to
issue a urchase order to outhern That the General Manager be, and is
alifornia Edison om an re hereby, authorized to issue a purchase
installat on of added under round order to Southern California Edison
facilities to provide for a Company in the amount of $69,499.00
4,000 kw, Standby electrical power and execute necessary documents, in
service for Plant No. 1 form approved by the General Counsel ,
for installation of added underground
`►' facilities to provide for a 4,000 kw, standby electrical power service for
Plant No. 1.
-10-
05/09/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue a
urchase order to Solar Turbines, That staff be, and is hereby,
Inc. (Specification No. R-036) authorized to issue a purchase order
to Solar Turbines, Inc. in an amount
not to exceed $45,000.00 plus sales tax for Repairs to Solar Energy
Generator No. 3 at Plant No. 1 (Specification No. R-036).
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amending Boards' action of April 11,
1990, revoking authorization to That the Boards' action of April 11,
issue a purchase order to Michael 1990, be, and is hereby, amended,
Chevrolet ono authorizing staff to revoking authorization for staff to
issue a purchase order to Folsom Lake issue a purchase order to Michael
Ford Specification No. A-150-2 Chevrolet in the amount of $86,535.00
plus tax for the purchase of nine
Chevrolet S10 pick-up trucks (Specification No. A-150-2) ; and authorizing
staff to issue a purchase order to Folsom Lake Ford in the amount of
$84,331.89 plus tax and delivery charges for purchase of nine Ford Ranger
pick-up trucks (Specification No. A-150-2) , in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program of the State of California
and State of California Contract No. 1-90-23-20.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Denying Application for Permission
to Present Late Claim of Lynn Redman That the Application for Permission to
Present Late Claim for personal
injuries filed by Leatrice L. Cohen, attorney for claimant Lynn Redman, be,
and is hereby, denied.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the
Executive Committee's meeting on
April 25, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Establishing policies and procedures
for selection and procurement of That the Boards of Directors hereby
professional engineering, adopt Resolution No. 90-43,
architectural , environmental , land establishing policies and procedures
surveying and construction for the selection and procurement of
management services professional engineering,
architectural , environmental , land
surveying and construction management services. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order t0 F. E. Carleton That staff be, and is hereby,
for professional consulting services authorized to issue a purchase order
re obtaining SCAQMD permits and to F. E. Carleton in an amount not to
other SCAQMD issues exceed $50,000.00 for professional
c insulting services, on an as-needed
basis, at the rate of $95.00 per hour, for a two-year period beginning
May 10, 1990, to assist the Districts in obtaining permits from the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for current and future
projects at both treatment plants, and for assistance relative to other
SCAQMD issues.
-11-
05/09/90
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7.11 6 13
toff re ort re on -ran a Financ a
Plan update and 1990- 1 Sewer
Connection Fee and Use Fee
Recommendations
Verbal staff report The General Manager reported
that to July 1989, as part of
the Districts' 112020 VISION" 30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan,
the Boards approved a Financial Plan prepared by the Action Plan
consulting team. Basically, the Financial Plan provides for financing
sewerage facilities expansion (capacity increases) by sewer connection
fees paid by new development; facilities rehabilitation and improved
treatment by borrowing capital funds in the securities market
(certificates of participation) ; and operations, maintenance and new
debt service by a combination of property taxes and user fees.
At the April Board Meeting, when ordinances to fix the sewer connection
fees and use fees for 1990-91 were introduced for first reading, some
Directors requested that additional information on the long-range plan
be provided to the Boards. When the Boards originally reviewed the
various elements of the Master Plan the primary document utilized was
the "2020 VISION" Preliminary Report and Executive Summary. Therefore,
prior to this meeting a full copy of the adopted Financial Plan, which
is Volume 8 of the approved Master Plan, was mailed for the Directors'
review. It describes the Financial Plan in considerable detail and
also provides a summary in Chapter 1.
Each year, as part of the budget process, staff updates the fiscal
projections and recommends connection and user fee rates required to
finance Districts' activities for the ensuing year. Also enclosed with
the mailing was a separate staff report reflecting the updated
estimates for those Districts now considering their 1990-91 rates. At
this point the original Master Plan projections are pretty much on
target and, in fact, in most instances, the fee projections are
actually lower than estimated in the Master Plan. However, Districts'
activities are dictated by regulatory authorities whose actions can
cause major changes in the requirements and the cost of the Districts'
wastewater management program. Wastewater management costs will
continue to escalate for four basic reasons: (1) Stricter
environmental standards and regulations; -(2) The federal and state
governments no longer fund 8754 percent of facilities for improved
treatment; (3) Normal Inflationary trends; and, (4) Rising flows.
The Director of Finance then reported that for many years the
Districts, as part of the annual budgetary process, have forecast
revenues and expenditures on a five-year basis and since 1986-87 have
used a ten-year horizon. The purpose of this long-range financial
planning is to assure that adequate funding is available to carry out
the Districts' wastewater management program for the protection of
public health and the environment, and the benefit of the communities
and the two million citizens which the Districts serve in metropolitan
Orange County.
A major benefit of the long-range cash flow projections is that they
r..✓ enable a determination well in advance of when revenue shortfalls will
begin to occur so that the Boards of Directors will have adequate time
to consider alternative funding measures and take the necessary actions
to ensure each District's financial integrity.
-12-
05/09/90
For some time projections have indicated that funding shortfalls would
occur throughout the Districts during the latter part of the 1980's and
early 1990's, and that each District would have to consider additional
revenue sources to meet long-term funding requirements for sewerage
facilities improvements and expansion and ongoing operations and
maintenance costs. Property taxes, connection fees and federal and
state construction grants have historically been the major source of
local financing of District's activities. However, since Proposition
13 all ad valorem property tax revenue has been used in the Operating
Funds for maintenance, operations and rehabilitation and none has been
available for capital improvements. The costs of providing service
continue to rise beyond the ability of the property tax apportionments
and the past connection fee schedules to keep pace with the stringent
requirements of the federal , state and regional regulatory agencies for
advanced wastewater treatment and air emissions control , and the need
to provide additional facilities to meet the increasing demands on the
sewerage system.
The Director of Finance further reported that the capital facilities
charge (connection fee) is a one-time fee collected at the time a
building permit is issued and provides for capacity for new
development. The Districts' 30-year Master Plan adopted in 1989
proposed that this fee be reviewed and adjusted annually. The
recommended adjustment is for an increase of $10 per unit effective
with the 1990-91 fiscal year. The connection fees are identical in
each District to accommodate the collection by the cities on behalf of
the various Districts.
Mr. -Streed then briefly reviewed the proposed increases in the sanitary
sewer service charges (user fees) of Districts 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13,
commenting on the cash flow schedules upon which the staff's
recommendations for adjustments effective with the 1990-91 fiscal year
were based. He noted that District No. 2 just recently enacted an
ordinance adopting sanitary sewer service charges and, therefor, does
not need to make any adjustments at this time. District No. 7 has not
yet adopted sewer service charges, and the Irvine Ranch Water District
collects and pays user fees to District No. 14 in lieu of District 14
adopting separate sewer service charges.
He noted that in addition to the aforementioned fees, industrial firms
pay a separate user fee based on their actual demand on the sewerage
system as determined by the provisions of the Districts' uniform
Industrial waste ordinance.
The Director of Finance also reported that in accordance with the
recommendations contained in the Financial Plan included as part of the
30-year Master Plan, all Districts, except District 14 and possibly
District 13, will need to issue some form of debt over the next 10
years to meet approximately one-half of the capital needs. The
issuance of debt also allows a more gradual and stabilized annual
adjustment of user fees to meet fiscal obligations than would otherwise
be required on a cash pay-as-you-go basis.
-13-
05/09/90
Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated April 25, 1990 re Long-range Financial Plan
Update and 1990-91 Sewer Connection and Use Fee Recommendations, be,
�.. and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 & 13
Public hearing and adoption of
ordinances increasing capital
facilities connection charges
Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that
this was the time and place
fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5,. 6, 7, 11 and 13 for a public hearing on the following proposed
Ordinances, Amending Ordinances Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities:
Amending Repealing
District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No.
1 115 113 114
2 211 208 209
3 313 311 312
5 522 520 521
6 616 614 615
7 724 722 723
11 1112 1110 1111
13 1307 1305 1306
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the
hearing open at 8:20 p.m.
Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General
Counsel reported that the
proposed ordinances, making adjustments in the capital facilities
connection charges for each of the eight Districts, were
introduced for first reading at the April Board meeting. He
stated that no changes had been made to the ordinances since that
meeting. If adapted, the ordinances will take effect July 11,
1990.
Close hearing The Chairman declared the
hearing closed at 8:21 p.m.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 115 That proposed Ordinance No. 115,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 114, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
.r entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 115 by title only.
-14-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting ordinance No. 115 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Dan Griset, Charles E. Puckett,
Roger R. Stanton \,d
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 114, be,
and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Readin of Pro osed
Ordinance No. 21 That proposed Ordinance No. 211,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 209, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 211 by title only.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. Z11 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Iry Pickler, Chairman, Roland E. Bigonger, A. B. "Buck"
Catlin, Dan Griset, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, James
Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Don E. Smith,
Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Wayne Silzel
That Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 209, be,
and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance Na. 313 That proposed Ordinance No. 313,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and ^
Repealing Ordinance No. 312, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 313 by title only.
-15-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 31T by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Richard T. Polls, Chairman, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck"
Catlin, Norman E. Culver, Beth Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan
Griset, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickler, J. R. "Bob"
Slefen, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Paul Verellen,
Edna Wilson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Margaret M. Arnold
That Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 312, be,
and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading Of Proposed
Ordinance No. 522 That proposed Ordinance No. 522,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance NO. 520 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 521, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 522 by title only.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 522 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Evelyn Hart, Chairman, Phil Sansone, Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 520 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 521, be,
and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 616 That proposed Ordinance No. 616,
An Ordinance of the ,Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance NO. 615, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said Ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 616 by title only.
-16-
05/09/90 '
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 616 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 615, be,
and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ord nonce No. 724 That proposed Ordinance No. 724,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 723, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 724 by title only.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 7 4 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Dan E. Smith, Chairman, John C. Cox, Jr. , Richard B. Edgar,
Dan Griset, Sally Anne Sheridan, Roger R. Stanton, James A.
wanner
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 723, be,
and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT it Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 1112 That proposed Ordinance No. 1112,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 1111, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 1112 by title only.
-17-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 1112 by the fallowing roll call vote:
AYES: Grace H. Winchell , Chairman, Tam Mays, Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 1111, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 1307 That proposed Ordinance No. 1307,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No.. 1306, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 1307 by title only.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adapting Ordinance No. 13 7 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman, Iry Pickler, Don E. Smith, Roger R.
Stanton, Wayne D. Wedin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 1306, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13
Public hearing and adoption of
ordinances increasing sanitary
sewer service charges
Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that
this was the time and place fixed
by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5,
6, it and 13 for a public hearing on the following proposed Ordinances,
Amending Ordinances Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
la,.'
-18-
05/09/90
Amending Repealing
District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No.
1 116 109 112 �.✓
3 314 309 N/A -
5 523 516 519
6 617 609 fill 8 613
11 1113 1108 1109
13 1308 1303 N/A
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the
hearing open at 8:24 p.m.
Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General
Counsel reported that the
proposed ordinances, providing for adjustments to the sanitary
sewer service charges, were introduced for first reading at the
April Board meeting. He stated that no changes had been made. If
adopted, the ordinances will take effect July 1, 1990.
Close hearing The Chairman declared the
hearing closed at 8:25 p.m.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 116 That proposed Ordinance No. 116,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 116 by title only.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 116 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Dan Griset, Charles E. Puckett,
Roger R. Stanton
NOES: . None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No,- 1 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be, and is hereby, adopted.
-19-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 314 That proposed Ordinance No. 314,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 314 by title only.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 314 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Richard T. Polis,. Chairman, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck"
Catlin, Norman E. Culver, Beth Graham, Dan R. Griffin, Dan
Griset, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickier, J. R. "Bob"
Siefen, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Paul Verellen,
Edna Wilson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Margaret M. Arnold
That Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and
is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 523 That proposed Ordinance No. 523,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 523 by title only.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 527 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Evelyn Hart, Chairman, Phil Sansone, Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance bf the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be, and is hereby, adopted.
20
05/09/90
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 611 That proposed Ordinance No. 617,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. fill and 613, be read by
title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 617 by title only.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adapting Ordinance No. 617 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Propose
Ordinance No. 1113 That proposed Ordinance No. 1113,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No.- 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 1113 by title only. .
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 111 by the fallowing roll call vote:
AYES: Grace H. Winchell , Chairman, Tom Mays, Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1iud Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, be, and is hereby, adopted.
-21-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 1308 That proposed Ordinance No. 1308,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 1308 by title only.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 1308 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman, Iry Pickler, Don E. Smith, Roger R.
Stanton, Wayne D. Wedin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Directing the County Auditor-
Controller to include sewer service That the Boards of Directors hereby
charges on property tax bills adopt the following resolutions
commencing with 1990-91 fiscal year directing the County Auditor-Controller
to include sewer service charges on
the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinances of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 of Orange County, commencing with the
1990-91 fiscal year:
District Resolution No. Ordinance No.
1 90-44-1 116
3 90-45-3 314
5 90-46-5 523
6 90-47-6 617
11 90-48-11 1113
13 90-49-13 1308
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
-22-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin han a Order o. 6 to the
plans and specificat ons for That Change Order No. 6 to the plans
Contract Pos.2-Z6- and 2-27 and specifications for Portion of
Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between
Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim
Relief Sewer, an Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract
No. 2-27, authorizing an addition of $77,778.00 to the contract with
W. H. Ebert Corp. for six items of additional work and granting a time
extension of 14 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be,
and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to
issue a urchase order to Southern That the General Manager be, and is
California Gas Company for relocation hereby, authorized to issue a purchase
of gas main in order to construct order to Southern California Gas
Contract No. Z-Z8 Company in an amount not to exceed
$70,000.00 and to execute necessary
documents, in form approved by the General Counsel , for relocation of
approximately 1,400 feet of 4-inch diameter gas main required in connection
with construction of the Katella Relief Sewer, between Broadway and
Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-28.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 o the
l ons and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans
Contract Nos. -Z7-1 and 5- 7-2 and specifications for Rehabilitation
of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd
Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of
Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2, authorizing an
addition of $1,305.00 to the contract with National Plant Services, Inc. for
additional video inspection services, and granting a time extension of 60
calendar days for delay in starting the project to allow the contractor to
complete emergency repair work to sewers in San Francisco damaged by the
October 1990 earthquake, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Contract Nos. 5-27-1 and
5-37-2 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 90-50, accepting
Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado
Street, Contract No. 5-27-1. and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway
Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
-23-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m., May 9, 1990.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation No. 1
Garrett Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-51-7,
ordering annexation of 2.47 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of Amapola Avenue and Orange Park Boulevard in unincorporated
County territory (Annexation No. 129 - Garrett Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Reimbursement Agreemen
with George Adams, Jr. That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-52-7,
approving Reimbursement Agreement with George Adams, Jr. , providing for
reimbursement to Mr. Adams by the District of a proportional share of his
cost of constructing a sewer line in Baja Panorama Street, to be collected
from the owners of Lots 7 and 9 of Tract No. 939 upon connection to the
sewer. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m., May 9, 1990.
-24-
05/09/90
DISTRICTS 3 8 11
Actions re fi nancin desi n
construc on, capacity Ownership and
operation of certain master-planned
sewage collection facilities for
serving Districts 3 and 11; and the
Bolsa Chico area resen tl outside
the Dis ricts oundaries
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that studies have been
completed over the past several years which analyzed and prioritized
the needed sewage facilities for serving certain areas within
District 3 and District 11, and the area generally described as Bolsa
Chica which is presently outside the Districts' boundaries, concluding
that the long-planned extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer should be
replaced with the reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station by
both Districts 3 and 11, and recommending that construction costs be
shared in accordance with sewage flows generated from each District.
This change is projected to save District 3 $600,000 and District 11
$4,700,000.
Said studies include a 1988 report prepared by Willdan Associates which
dealt with the possible exchange of drainage areas between Districts 3
and 11; the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan (30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, "2020 VISION") ; and a
recently-completed Project Report on the Slater Avenue Pump Station
Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17.
The Director of Engineering reviewed various elements of the reports,
noting that the most urgent improvements needed are the reconstruction
of the Slater Avenue Pump Station including the influent and discharge
facilities for the pump station. These facilities will cost
approximately $7,600,000. The second priority is replacement of the
Goldenwest Trunk Sewer, between Heil Avenue and Slater Avenue, at a
cost of $4,300,000. He also noted that additional facilities required
include the parallel Slater Avenue Trunk, the Heil Avenue Interceptor,
improvements to facilities in Warner Avenue west of Springdale Street,
and new lines in Springdale and Goldenwest Streets north of McFadden
Avenue and Edinger Avenue, respectively.
Mr. Dawes advised that the proposed capacity exchanges in certain
existing and proposed sewage facilities would result in a net equity
purchase from District 11 by District 3 in the amount of $630,836.00.
He added that the proposed agreement between Districts 3 and it would
provide for payment by District 3 in the amount of $1,050,000 and
District 11 in the amount of $16,950,000 for the total cost of
facilities described above, including the joint $7,600,000
reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station, influent sewers and
discharge facilities.
The necessary capital for these facilities could be provided by fees
from the development of Bolsa Chica and other vacant areas within the
northwesterly portion of District 11 if collected on a timely basis.
For District 3, the development of Holly-Seacliff properties would more
than offset the funding necessary for their prorated share of the
Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements.
-25-
05/09/90
With regard to development of the Bolsa Chica area, staff reported that
In April 1987 the Directors of District 11 authorized staff and General
Counsel to negotiate with owners of approximately 1,608 acres in the
Bolsa Chica area. The Signal Bolsa Corporation is the principal
landowner. The Bolsa Chica area 1s presently outside the boundary of
District 11 but within its sphere of influence. Signal Bolsa
principals and counsel and Districts' staff and counsel have met
numerous times over the past several years in an attempt to come to a
pre-annexation agreement. However, Signal Bolsa Corporation is not yet
ready to annex and recently advised staff that they are no longer
willing to proceed with the proposed pre-annexation agreement. The
last draft of the proposed agreement provided for the annexation of the
Bolsa Chica area and pre-payment of fees for those areas to be
developed by Signal Bolsa to provide the necessary funding for
construction of capacity in the Slater Pump Station system to serve the
Bolsa Chica if and when it is annexed.
Staff emphasized that it is necessary to proceed with design and
construction of the Slater Pump Station system and the Districts cannot
delay the project any longer waiting for Signal Bolsa Corporation to
make up its mind on the issue of a pre-annexation agreement.
The Director of Engineering pointed out that if capacity for the Bolsa
Chica is not included in the Slater Pump Station system, Signal Bolsa
would have to construct its own sewer lines through the Bolsa Chica
area and tie into the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer at a cost that would
be substantially higher than putting up the money now for capacity in
the Slater Pump Station system. Funding and construction of the
facilities to connect to the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer would have to
be provided by the property owners/developers.
Staff and Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion relative to
whether or not the Slater Avenue Pump Station should be sized to
provide for capacity for the Bolsa Chica area. In response to a
request for clarification on the issue of whether or not to include
capacity for Bolsa Chica in the Slater Avenue Pump Station system, the
staff and General Counsel pointed out that if such capacity was
included without the benefit of a pre-annexation agreement with the
property owners to provide the necessary funding, in effect the
rate-payers in Districts 3 and 11 would have to front the costs without
any assurance that they would be recovered in the future. Staff
further advised that because of the urgent need to proceed withdesign
and construction of the facilities they had notified Signal Bolsa
Corporation that they must make a decision by May 15, 1990 on the
pre-annexation agreement, and that without such an agreement the
Districts could provide no assurance that the area could be annexed or
provided sewerage service by the Districts in the future. It was also
pointed out that officials representing the City of Huntington Beach,
in whose sphere of influence Bolsa Chica also lies, have been .kept
apprised of the matter.
Following further discussion it was the consensus of the Directors that
unless a pre-annexation agreement is executed by the Bolsa Chica
property owners, capacity to serve the area should not be included in
the Districts' sewage system.
.J -26-
05/09/90
Staff noted that the Directors were not being asked that evening to
make a decision on the capacity issue. Final design and sizing of the
Slater Avenue Pump Station system will be presented to the Board for ^-
consideration at a future date.
Receive file and approve Staff Moved, seconded and duly carried:
epor
That the Staff Report dated
May 1, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
Receive file a rove and ado t Moved, seconded and duly carried:
he roject Report re on tract
o. 11-17 prepared by John Larollo That the Project Report relative
Engineers to Slater Avenue Pump Station
Sewage System Improvements,
Contract No. 11-17, dated April 3, 1990, prepared by John Carollo
Engineers, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, approved and
adopted.
Approving Agreement between Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Districts 3 and 11 re financing,
design, construction, capacity That the Boards of Directors
ownershi and o eration df certain hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-53,
sewage collection foci i ies approving Agreement between
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 3 and 11 providing for financing, design, construction, capacity
ownership and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection
facilities for serving Districts 3 and 11. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Authorizing staff and General Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Counse7 t0 ne otiate with General
Telephone and lectronics GTE t0 That staff and General Counsel
secure a site adjacent to existing be, and are hereby, authorized to
Slater Avenue Pump Station for negotiate with General Telephone
construct on of new pump s a ion and Electronics (GTE) to secure
a site adjacent to the existing
Slater Avenue Pump Station for construction of the new pump station,
providing for the exchange of the existing, smaller site for the new
site, upon abandonment of the existing pump station; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to execute the necessary Cxuments to effect such exchange, in form
approved by the General Counsel ; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That payment to GTE in an amount not to exceed
$25,000.00 for said exchange, be, and is hereby, authorized.
-27-
�•✓
05/09/90
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
`../ That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
Secretary of Di'a tors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 69 7, 11, 13 and 14
-28-
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/04/90 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP45
CLAIMS PAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE P4/11/90
WARRANT Nn_ vrun unOuT nrn rN rP+rnu
F 105996 ASS VENT. INC. 4187.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS
;9 ( 105998 ASK INDUSTRIES CORP. S472.80 "BRING USES PRE OVERPAYMENT
n 105999 AIR 'PRODUCTS S"'CHEMICAL 'INC. S948.36 PACKING NATERIALs
106PD1 SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA $2.604.19 INGTRGFENT/SAPE'CY SUPPLIES
106002 ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. $59.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
w 106004 ALVARADO HILLS, INC. '$139.22 REFUND USSR PER OVERPAYMENT
!� 106005 ' AMEN. INST. L.A. TECH. CENTER '.S995.D0 TRAINING CLASS REGISTRATION
MEIAL URNS
59'
106007 BOSCO INC. L/OR AMERICAN SEALS 11,111.17 SEALS/GASKETS
106086 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $329.38 FILM
'0 106010 ANAHEIM 'MEOICAL SQUARE" " "'$89.81 REFORM USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
10
106011' ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 527.654.75 , SEUSR REPAIRS'
..." AAUIEPE.i ruw ro 'nn_ .Tu_Nu RerRnu
pl 106013 SLAM P. ANGERSON - $675.44 MEETING MUSE `
106014 ANTNONY•S MECH. S MACHINE. INC 92.628.20 MECHANICAL PARTS
ry x rRcnr4 eo TIC
EL n r .4.4-.P. ml/MRn env GUXTPRR
106016 AQUAN8IOASSAY S CONSULTING $2.110.00 DCBANRSA U
106017 ARATES. SERVICES. INC. $3,544.70 UNIFORM SERVICE
H'
166019 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $944.04 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
!J y� 106020 ART WORKS $544.27 FRAMING SERVICES
N
a 106022 BFM 'ENERGY PRODUCTS CORP. S4.382.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
186023 BFM TGANSPORT DYNAN IC$ CORP. ' .; 5678.52 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
.ncnnA vAlrw�rv.vsnAu's rou.nr'. ...n.T.._.T rear nnmver. N n zla_sR
106C25 SALLY RETAIL. INC. $150.00 BACKUP CLAIM
106C26 BANCROFT-WXITNET CO. $430.65 PUBLICATION
' 106028 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1.246.71 LAB SUPPLIES
106029 BLA87U$ E,LECTMIC TRUCK. INC. $07.71 ELECTRIC CARP PARTS
]ASCII ROYJ d.IPr ...._.. TRDrR.1.TR
!r, 106031 BORLAND INTERNATIONAL SB7.62 PUBLICATIONS
106032 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $904.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES
SI
N' 106034 BROWN B CALOVELL CONSULTING 1218._115.21 EIIGINEBRING SERVICES 3-19
106035. - BURNE EHRINEERIN6 CO.. . $1016.31 MOTOR
F.MD1T
106037 C S D GREASE COMPANY $1.308.37 REFUND USER FEE OVQRPAYMEMT
Fl 106030 CFT $164.45 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
N.
116010 CAL-CHEM SALES $36.76 HARDWARE
R° 106041 CAL SOUTH EQUIPMENT CO. $502.50 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION
H
. w
FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/0419; PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AF43
CLAIMS PAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE 64/12/90
I�
.� 156042 CALTROL • INC. S714•23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _
- UGK-PARTs
106044 EAUF ENERGY EpMM" ?U0. M4-13 $64.58 YOBLICATION '
106045 CASA GRANDE CONVALESCENT MOSP $612.63 REFUND USER FIN GIMPATNEICIfl -
.nAneA r�+- ••.710 4 •i7Cx '3.7.6-+e BV6THl114BB¢14F6T¢BIR " rH10!NONE
1660e7 CNTR. FOR ADVANCED PROF. DIV. fl•390.00 RECISTRATIOP ..
206048 CENTURY SAFETY INST. f SUPP. 5362.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES
M1A— RSJPSAM�
u R&-F66OVS8PA41@NT
30605p CHP7STE ENGINEER I 530.068.00 SEVER BRING SERVICES
ID6051 CHURCH-ENGINEER IN6.- 1NC. S1.ST2.Sl ENGINEERING SOIVICE6 7-13
106053 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $21.047.63 PUMP PARTS
1, n06U51 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV• $16.41 MumMumPARTS
. ee . e7E0 ELF pT IC'L 675• t7 772-71 ¢LE6TR¢C GDPPLIRG
101156 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $5.912.61 CEARINE M.O.10-I1-87
&DAUNT CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS - }9.190.75 BLUEPRINTING 7-12-89
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES -
106059 ROSS COOK. INC. 5953.03 SLAVER REPAIRS
IT7 10606E COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC. $1.115.179.85 ENGINES M.0.5-13-67.6-8-88. J-19A
ngGERETC UVPLTAG
P'= 106062 [ DAVID WILLIAM CRAPNELL ':c 5367.93 BRDCRORE SERVICES. -
M� 106063 CRAFT SHIFTS. INC 52.652.06 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT C ^"JNA ITT '2011e e0 40NPBW GLR Rc J 7 4
B—I IVS065 CAL WATER r ' x•• $136.75 RER'AL EQUIPMEE
,..In 106866 LARRY CURTI TRUCK 8 EQUIPMENT $22.040.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.4-13-88
14 EIIRAB-ReGId'FRAriON
N 10606p - -- EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 45.168.61 STATE IINPI�LDY1!¢tlT IN6 C8
.y 106069 T. CA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT $334.09 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
A A,.n nnxrne T•er SEuu— T2�200 A. =Ms
^j 106071 OATAPRO RESEARCH CORP. $738.30 PUBLICATION
!6x�1 106072 DE ANZA CORPORATION i4.5T3.61 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
m o®vaspR
106074 DICKSONS 5133.88 ELECTRIC PARTS -
/' 106075 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 511997.72 PRINTING -
1n1n71 III.CTTAl .E0UIR RV¢CR-AGRBBI®VI
106C77 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. S25.721.64 PLART MAINTENANCE 6 RBPAISS
K106078:21DUNKEL BROS. MACH MOVING $900.00 ENGINE UNLOADING COSTS
rs
A06080 EASTMAN• INC. $2.389.79 DPpIa SUPPLIER -
10608 EL TOFITO 6PILL St86.35 REFUND USSR PEE OVELPATMSNE
.nen o1^ fYu•Rnuxsxr A.
eren .e rr eeenr_ - — S .1—
�" 106083 JEFF ESKER $171.36 MILEAGE
J 106084 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. f121.80 BARDWARE
MX 106086 FEDERAL
R_ re.xrxS CORP.
AIR MIGHT -SERVICB.CJ-7-.rJ-2D
.u�. 106087 FEDERAL EMPRESS CDpP. SSt.90 AIR AREICRT
:�. 306U87. FERRELLGAS tg5.90 PROPANE
N
u'
I
FUND NO 9199 . JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/04/99 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 04/1L/90 POSTING BATE C4/11/90 ^
J
106088 FICO`S APPLIANCE SERVICE $70.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIESR. SOFAM"
106090 _ - -FILTER. SUPPLY CO. S111.11 - PILTmS
106091 FISCHER S PORTER CO. '$1,390.03 CHLORINATION PARTS
L06082 -'. ISM `: •`FC--C^ °:52 .fine 73 6AB PDPP6F8N _ n
106093 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $43.50 FILM Iu.
166094 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $6,125.44 WATER USEAGE
106296 SRS RESTAURANT SVCS $6.757.86 - REPEH UGER FEE UPERPATMENT Li
106097 GARDEN GROVE PROF. BLDG. $136.66 REFUND USER Y88 OVERPAYMENT
...... ` ^`pGL1S` iN STAkk ERS sum 00 6BRM ARA
L06099 GENERAL•TELEPHONE CO. $1.693.61 TELEPHONE SERVICES
- 106100 GEORGE LEECH L ASSOCIATES $188.81 SWITCH 2T
ART
S 1B6102 OIERLICH-MITCHELL. INC. $18.456.34 MECHANICAL PARTS -
-'106303 4 GRAPHIC%CONTROLS.-- 5509.15 INSTHUMERC SUPPLIES Fl
106105 MACH COMPANY $34.19 LAB SUPPLIES --
fYl 106106 MARCO CORPORATION 16.371.29 MECHANICAL PARTS
_ .106108 MICHAEL. HEINZ ' - 5271.8E MERIING A TRAINING ETFENSE �1
106109 HEWLETT PACKARD- COMPANY S300.00 `BLGIBTRA'fLOR.
A
CONPBESSOR PARTS
106111 HOUSE OF BATTERIES S56O.49 BATTERIES
n ID6112 A.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. S1.724.82 HARDWARE _
-2q% 20 WATER owns
LN 106114 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. $70.82 RBPUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT _—
106115 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $198.59 RUBBER STAMPS'
146117 IMPERIAL 'JEST CHEMICAL $81.791.73 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-08-89
106118 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $669.11 CONNECTORS
106120 INLAND EXPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $1.025.31 EQOIPEES RENTAL I .
106121 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 320.53 ' - 'UM USFAGE -
u
136123 JENSEN TOOLS a ALLOYS S369.70 VACUUM BAGS
106124 JOYCE OFFICE PRODUCTS S406.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES
106126 KAMAN BEARINGS S SUPPLY 5428.85 PITTINGS -
106127 KANER COMPANY 91,680.35 SWLS/B6RWABB
106129 KAY-RAY. INC. $695.73 INSTBEffiR PARTS
106130 THE KEITH COMPANIES $1.237.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35636
106132 KING BEARING. INC. .S12.586.28 MECHANICAL PARTS 1
106133 KNO3 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES - $44.17 TOOLS
J
- m
FUND AO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING RATE 4/04/90 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
f0 NTV QLNITATION Ml9TR7f TS OF 1@LNff f0 9TV
CLAIMS. PAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE 04/11/90
106134 EASTMAN KODAK CO. $09.42 LAM SUPPLIES
'106136 L.A. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS S155.19 FUND?
PABTS^u
J 106137 LA BUINTA MOTOR INN SZ12.37 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
• OVRRPAYINdii
106139 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $140.46 SAYETY SUPPLIES
M.V. LAWHASTER L CO.. INC. 04,162.30 SOIL TESTING
J 106142 LEARN KEY = $194.90 TRAINING MANUALS
'J 106143 LE ROY CRANDALL 0 ASSOC. $2.216.47 GE(DECHNICAL INSPECTION
L.,
1U6145 DAVID L. LOMAX EPDXY INJ. $6.750.00 SENIOR REAPIRS
106146 LOS ALAMITOS ECONO WASH $696.45 REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT
LTwR
31 106190 ` NBC APPLIED ENVIR ONMENTAL 5910.00 OCBAH MNIITORINO
106149 MDS NUCLEAR INC.-. , $355.94 LAB SUPPLIES
PM .Aline M91 19\9_i9 ' Pgll'IV ....TC SPVVTf.Qq '
106151 MACOMCO' S197.26 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
X 106152 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. S589.52 POLYURETHANE
106154 MARSHALL MA1NT. PRODUCTIONS $55.00 TRAINING VIDEOS
106155 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S47.59 INSTBOIffiIT SUPPLIES
1 t6L\96 MA1F - fNIOq. TNf_ il.Tg9_T9 QIPPTRTf A TY9
'T 106157 MCKENNA ENGP. S EGUIP. S2.303.50 PACKING MATERIALS
'b> 106158 MCLEAN MIDWEST S1\548.8P AIR CONDITIONER
WIl .OL159 YfN15TFq.fAgq SIIP PIY f0. i5L_TO MECHANICAL PARTS
6l, 206160 R.S. MEANS CO.. INC. $774.65
PUBLICATION
106161 THOMAS R. MELTON S153.26 MILEAGE
1 gAlL9 - NTf BDI Lr rn.PMTFq a95q.19 COMPUTER PARTS
,. 106163 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. $387.36 PIPE SUPPLIES
106164 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $909.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES
P.' 10.11% NTTi MTSNT rON91MFR FL FrT ILO 9_AY REPRND 'USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _
L`~'J 106166 MONTEREY CARPETS '.$997.35 REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT
WE'JI 1061 ST MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES' •TB.B90.00 LAS SERVICES
.B616q 1'DNTREC SUPPLY rQ_ '%' iwc.oq - SMALL NARUWARK
106169 MOTTON SALT AND/OR S215.44 SALT
106170 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $64.31 MECHANICAL PARTS
LA- SERVTcrs CELLULAR SERVICES
NA 106172 TIONAL HEAT TREATING CO..INC 1220.22 REFUND USER PER OVERPATMENT
186173 NATIONAL PLANT "SERVICES. INC. $3.562.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE
P�\ NATTONA MEMBERSHIP PEES
C'• 116175 NEAL SUPPLY Co. 1813.24 FITTINGS ..
N' 106176 NEVA PK ELE CTROMICS $213.28 INSTRUMENT PARTS
q REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
106178 NORDSTROM $56.93 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT
106179 NORTHWEST MOTOR WELDING. INC. $9.500.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
PI
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCCSSING DATE 9/U4/9^ PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
0n NT. Se .nnu n S.CIS nc nSANrF C^UAIiY
1i CL61MSPAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE 04/11/90
Nmae.T x _ Nrunnx AKANN+ nrS rSTxT ixx
.�; 106180 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES. $9,059.37 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-4
R
106183 ORATHENGE
OEM ART CORPBEARING.
i24162.67 MISBM@7f YARtB.
106... Og4NGE EEApiNG. 'J NG. S162.6T BELTS..:
101CSURE" ""GCE` 811PF6LRB
.. 106185 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 1137.99 TRUCK PASTS
106186 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. STB0.90 R8PON0 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT106188 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE 1251.27 NECEAEICAL PASTS
I19 106289 OR AN BE YALYE 6 FI TYING CO. 9358.88 F13TINC6'
1I'10'I 106192 COUNTY OF ORANGE 32.953.0E DATA YHOCE39IWG SERPICES
r 106192 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $13.228.98 REMORSE WORKER'S Cal@ INSURANCE
106194 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $859.35 MEET'
10,6195. PACIFIC PARTS 9114.55 u7!EEBISB
Jul .nc.or erT c.P a EETI EQUIPME., r _ • {B•-1^ SAPRYILSBIYLLRS
N"m 106197 PACIFIC BELL S2B.90 T8L8PBONC 8R010ES
106190 PACTEL CELLULAR $58.20 CELLULAR TELEPBONE SRBPICES
"HI 106200 PATHFINDER INSTRUMENTS $267.35 ELECTRICAL PARTS.
to 106201 PHOTO { SOUND CO. S125.00 REPAIRS --
106203 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $141.91 PLASTICS
n 106204 POLY PURE. INC. $19,657.19 POLYMERS H.O.B-9-B9.1-10-90
pnurg " "I
N' 106206 POWER SPECIALISTS. INC. - $46.93 FREIGET
10620i. HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE . . $72.09 ICE
i ncgnd Tnr oSn rCIS Sm . "08 rn_ 31 TYT_nn TU¢.e"vrmreeiON-INBPBLZ'lALN 0 8 '0 BB
106209 R.P.M. ELECTRIC MOTORG 14.877.38 ELECTRIC MOTOR
1°K 106210 P4INBOY DISPOSAL CO. SB56.99 TRASB fl8N0YA1
J 106212 ME01. EXPRESS $39.00 LAB SUPPLIERS
106213 THE REGISTER S1A95.60 ROIICBS S AGE
106215 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 62.433.78 INSTRUMERI' PARTS/FITTINGS
106216 RICHAROS. YATSON i GERSHON 110.13T.92 LEGAL 9ER910E8 6-11-86
nnp_
10621S ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL S2.073.31 ELECIIIC SUPPLIES
.. .� 106219 RDYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S692.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES.
1 n6�Pn lecrtrw. rru rnxo_ aTc9_an PsxmS nSean
106221 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS 81.100.56 ELECTRIC PART
106222 SEA COAST DESIGNS 44.519.67 OFFICE EQOIPMSNT
L. REACH
K. 106224 SEARS. ROEBUCM 6 CO. $369.95 TOOLS
�10 l06225 SH AMROCN SUPPLY $1,600.79 EAROYARB
2
FUND NO 9199 • JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/04/91 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
BE ur.E
E
CLAIMS PAID 04/21/90 POSTING DATE .4/11190
. vrunn. ^T OF Tf^IpJ.nu
n uA146226u^ SILVER .SPRINGS PATER a^$3.131.66 REPOND USER 7E8 OVEBPAT!¢NT
- i3165
b 106228 ,SMITH-EMERT CO. $599.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89
106229 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $289.00 APPLICATION FEES
lui -_..Gai0N 3 —
106231 10. COAST AIR OUALITV $1,950.40 APPLICATION PEES
106232 S0. COAST AIR BUALI TT 5225.OP PUBLICATIONS
1D11`t °^U ULJ A' DODfE '�• L^_.-_.- SX— AARTS
106234 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $6.794.36 POWER
106235 SO. CALIF. EDISON CO. S6.723.00 POWER POLE RELOCATION
106237 WESTALLOI' INC. f1.648.74 TOOLS/WELDING SUPPLIES
106238 SPEEDE SPEEDOMETER ST5.74 DRIVER METING
T— —S
y 106240 PARK H. STEINYAMDER $116.88 BACKUP CLAIM -
'.^JI 106241 STERLING ART ' 936.72 GILPSIC SUPPLIES
�—�A2— NIRTICRARRif FEP91GE6
INS306243 SUMMIT STEEL f2.387.27 3TE¢L
106244 SUPELCO. INC. f218.26 LAB SUPPLIES
OAPLT85
to
10624 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. s12916. TOOLS e
� � 106248T TA.. .4- MA GOON )OBI LHOME PERK 9106.72 B
..72 REVISED USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
T^UfZ AASTB
^� 106249 IMGRPE INSULATION f90.05 BUILDING MATERIAL
.�n 106250 TIME MOTION TOOLS f3S.51 SMALL TOOLS
.^"'• •^MTIY.LOC. B .... ......0 ft16 i0 SOFT LOW
106252 TOTAL PREVENTIONSYSTEMS $464.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-27-1
. 206253 .14.0. TRERICE-006 $906.28 ELECTRIC PARTS
206255 J.G. TUCKER 6 SON, INC. S512.48 INSTR@®1T PART '
206256 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $3.813.60 SOIL TESTING M.0.644-69
--_ INSTRUMENT REPAIR
ff 106258 UNOCAL S240.61 UNLEADED GASOLINE
106259 UNITED ELECTRIC SUPPLY f39.14 BLEC121M SUPPLIES
I..... ERVA --
l06261 UPJOHN HEALTHCARE SERVICES $125.00 CPR TRAINING
I OE 262 VMS (VISUAL "GMT. SYSTEMS) $5.664.85 INSTRUMENT
G85I... -
106264 VWR SCIENTIFIC $6.436.73 LAB SUPPLIES
106265 VACATIONLAND - $2.566.46 REFUND USER.PER OVERPAYMENT
,d 106267 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP 164.124.31 INSTRDffiMT PARTS
306268 VERTEX SYSTEMS f5.235.00 CD@U¢ER DATA SUPPORT
1062 TO Vol TE%R.INDUSTRIES.. S995.00 DOOR REPAIR
106271 JOIN MAPLES $533.52 DOOR CONTROL CONSULTANT
(.
.FUND NO 9199 - JT LIST YOPNING CAPITAL FPOCESSING HATE 9/40/9; PAGE 7
NUM
REPORT NUMBER Ip43
COUNTY SANIT
Tll .—
CLAIMS cA10 04/31/90 POSTING DATE o4/l u9/11/90
106272 CARL YARREN 6 CO. $426.86 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
GI
;1 116274 YESTERN PACIFIC. EDNIPMENT CO. $761.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
�. 1G6275 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL-SUPPLY ► a'B57.84 GUSTIC SODA H.0.9-9-89
•4.." Yi661h JIRDi Ei-.T^"• NO 98 PN86ifAiiOU
106277 XEROX CORP. $7.674:22 COPIER LEASES
1P6278 GEORGE YAROLET ASSOCIATES .56 A.57 VALVE
eIjUIP1®IT R810T"•
106280 EVERETT H. YORE CO. 1197.10 CNOINS PARTS
v
106201 RICHARD YOUNG PROD $534.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES
106283 BRINDER90N CORP. $225,000.00 CONSTRUCTION 3-19-2
1UTAL CLAIMS PAID. - { 2,923,910.90
SUMMARY AMOUNT
OI GREG. FUND { iiP nn
/2 OPER PU1G1 5,128.00
xW 12.CAP PAILITORRY, - 2,962.58
OPER HIND - - n Rif 01
r 03 CAP PAC FOND 626.50
�^D /5 GREG FUND 735.57
CAP PAC FORD % mi_fn
OPER FORD 226.00
/6 CAP FAC FUND 4.71
w 07 CAP PAC FUND 3.229.94
_ ill OPER FUND 4,319.12
013 OPER FUND
/14 OPER ROSS 20.53
A. 114 CAP In FUm 5.386.40
0546 CAP E&C am 14 gag So
0667 OPSR FUND 2.274.67'
_ 07414 OPER FUND 2.035.92
]T OPER FUND SRI 9A0.79
u COBP 2,044,463.55
SBLF FUNDED NORR6RR CO11Y INSURANCE FUND 13.922.72
w JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FOND all AAA.7A _
w
{ 2.923.910.90
NA
a�
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19/90 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
I•I WARRANT N0. VENDOR - AMOUNT OESCRIP71ON
N 106297 ACCESS ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS $438.25 LAB SUPPLIES
106298 GEORGE ADAMS JR• $7,844.25 Bil PANORAMA FBIM AGREEMENT
b • EQUIP
n 306300 STASIA ALLEN . $N.26 MILEAGE EXPENSE
n 1013011 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE i1i293.32 AUTONDBILE LEASES
H.
SUPPLIES
H 106503 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $1.752.62 Ill
Fi7 106304 AMERITECH $97.75 COPIER LEASE
lialHER HFAXWDIST .
106306 APCO VALVE A PRIMER CORP SIS0.08 VALVE .
106307 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.115.55 NOTICES 6 ADS
• Y SEll
106309 ARATEM SERVICES, INC. $3.943.35 UNIFORM RENTALS
106310 ARNEL DEVELOPMENT CO. $535.27 REFUND PLAN CRECK OVER DEPOSIT
..
U 106319 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING 316D.00 SOIL TESTING
306313 AREA - CORP. OF COASTAL AGENCY $350.90 REGISTRATIOM -
—1E6'31T�FA'ECO U1 bPU.AL_E1AY`rCE_ 41Z9.11t).4. GRIT REMOVAL H.O.7-13-88
Irri= 106315 P.Y. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. S5.58C.3C CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-34-142.P2-37
r 106316 0. BATEMAN $595.00 USHERED COIN DISTRIBUTION
D OS REPOND .
I" 106318 BANTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS S2.602.16 LAX SUPPLIES
. 106319 HOWARD BLEVINS S200.00 REVIEWED COMP DISTRIBUTION
til
---1V63Z0— 4SCAUL url Ym ODUG'b s52C.55 0 UPPLIES
L"O 106321 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $143.13 RADIATOR REPAIR
106322 BON-A-RUES 1126.26 TRDCH PARTS
EtWTXl • 01 ES NG S8 VIC -
W�I 206324 BRAGG CRANE 6 RIGGING CO. f762.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
106325 BRIM - MAR 1 $1,225.54 REPIMD PLAN CEHCH OVER DEPOSIT
YE32L—�EMeFRT-EA0R1525O.UO DEPOSITFUND _
��.... 106327 BROWN L CALDWELL CONSULTING $3.273.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 89-45
i 186328 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $1.498.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
♦ I -
106330 GARY G. STREED 22.464.35 PETTY CASE REIMMURSEXIMT
pppyyy 106332 BY-PRODUCTS MANAGEMENT, INC. $30.419.24 FERROUS CHLORIDE M.O.4-12-89
—�06732 CPTCON1r. TFS000TT r - SERVICE AGREEMENT
106333 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. $1.111.02 LAB SUPPLIES
w 106334 CALTROL . INC. 43.154.61 REGULATOR PARTS
w 105335— CA
06336 CAROLLO-BOYLErA JOINT VENTURE 91.710.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9
+_.106337 JOHN CAROELO ENGINEERS $34.666.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-15
10TRUCK FIR75-
6339 JOHN CASON 33.687.50 MECHANICAL PARTS
106340 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEP $6.357.13 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
15700 SDHSCR7PTTON -
0 106342 CENTURY PAINT $781.28 PAINT SUPPLIES
m:
1 L
FUND NO 9199 - JV GIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE //19/9U PAGE P `
REPORT NUMBER AF43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID d4125199 POST I illf—D-AfF647F97 90
M� WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106343 CHALLENGE BEARING $ IND. SFLY $63.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES -
w 106344 PENNY CHARTIER $250.00 _ DEPOSIT REFUND -
166345 CHEVRON .S.A.. INC. $11• 2.93 UNISJUDED GASOLINR
106346 WILLIAM N. CLARKE 2610.54 DETERRED COMP PAID"
106347 C.E.E.S. . CO. . INC. 41.941.00 MECEUKICAL.PARTS
APRLSS.K COMP NEWTS OF C&LIFS26. T4.k9 PUMP PARTS
106319 COMPUTER OATACON $922:21 PRINTER MASONS
116350 COMPUSERVE $215E COMPUTER SERVICES
31�"L f 4.73--- TRO PARTS
106352 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST. $7,041.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -
106353 CONTAINERIZED CHEMICAL OISPOSA $975.00 TDRIC WASIB DISPOSAL
10, LUM14MLOIAL UKAPHIC3 �TTE6.P1— BLURPRINTING M.O. -12-89
Ian 186355 CONTROL CABLES. INC. $44.16 Mum PARTS
M+� 106356 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. $128.0$3.02 ENGINES M.O. 5-13-67.6-8-89, J-19A
1.4 ♦ �9- CEP TS
106358 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $944.67 EECMC SUPPLIES -
vr 106359 CHEMPRO ENVIRONNENTAL SERVICES 21.253.98 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
CAL WATER3 6. S- EQUIPl03f1' RENTAL
n ITl 106361 LARRY CURTI TRUCK 6 EQUIPMENT 925,080.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.4-13-88
X 106362 STATE OF CALIF. DEPT. OF BEN. S99.01 PUBLICATION PRE
m�I56363— STATE-OF-C7LIFDRATr--- �$16�.D SB PROCESS NC lam,, STATE OF CALIFORNIA $160.00 SBE PROCESSING FEE
186365 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $255.11 DIESEL USE TAE
u.. CALIFORNIA $160.00 SAS PROCESSING PEE
.a 106367 DAILY PILOT l40.50 NOTICES 6 ADS
106368 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 12♦041.92 TIM
DiWITCOIR IROCI 50. ONTRACI SERVICE
e 106370 DESKTOP GRAPHICS UN DESIGN $36.00 GRAPHICS SUPPLIES
106371 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 1573.74 OUTSIDE PAINTING
♦ SPACE RENTAL -
w. 106373 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. f702.68 PAINT SUPPLIES _
106374 D•VALS SALES $357.94 MECHANICAL PARTS
1 - TDD7B8 --
106376 ERA SERVICES. INC. A20.637.97 CONSULTING SERVICES PZ-44
146377 - ENSECO-CRL $3.700.00 - OCEAN SAMPLING
�U6LAbIRAMS
G •106379 ECOANALYSIS. INC. $2♦414.17 OCEAN MONITORING
166380 ECOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING S AAALY 97.750.00 OCEAN RESEARCH
o ET.TSERV7LE-L . PUMP PARTS —
106382 ENYIR ONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $459.00 LAB SAMPLES
.N 196383 MARSHALL FAIRRES $350.50 DETERRED C01U DISTRIBUTION
�35STU"LC` _---CON TROCTI0R_3[ - - , J-ZU -_
106395 FARR SALES L SERVICE $2.332.99 -- FILTERS _
w, 106386 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP. $293.00 AIR MIGHT
n _4
106380 FICO•S APPLIANCE SERVICE $207.12 VACUUM BELT
v
w
FUND NO 9199 - OT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19/9U PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER APO]
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106389 MICHAEL J.. FILECCIA $162.63 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
106390 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO. $2.466.97 PLOY METER
I0G
106392 FLO-SYSTEMS - 98.444.55 PUMP PARTS
1 106393 FLUID COMPONENTS♦ INC. $9.742.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS
ire 106395 CLIFFORD A. FORKERT 5669.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
106396 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $364.7( FILM
J
r.l 106398 FOX ENTERPRISES $1,825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT
106399 FOXBORO CO. / HAS SYSTEMS $64.01 MACHINE PART
p.. DEFERRED COW PAYOFF
106401 FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS $299.75 TRUCK PARTS
106402 A.F. FREY i105.0U DEFERRED C0W DISTRIBUTION
9x
306404 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $3.031.36 LONGER
106405 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS iS♦418.75 FIBERGLASS won
i9 di00 0LN[RM1 MOLT PARTS S SCRO COR 562.20 S7[FEIY SOPPLIPS
iv� rn 106407 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6.553.37 TELEPHONE
r. X 106408 GERHARDT•Sr INC. 2561.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS
IDS" W 106110 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION 51.208.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
106411 DON GREEN S ASSOCIATES $4.507.50 SURVEYING SERVICES US 88-72
I No .. q.R. EDNPtlTE
186413 HACH COMPANY $151.50 LAB SUPPLIES
w. CORP. 490400 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIR
bU 206414 FRED 4. HARPER . 31.495.03 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
106416 HATCH S KIRK. INC. $1,844.91 MECHANICAL PARTS
u 106417 HATFIELD DEVELOPMENT CO 21.667.92 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT .
lief 106419 MYLES S. HIGASHIMURA 54.59 MILEAGE EXPENSE
10642D HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRIC 5700.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
file. IMD PARSur
MTSi-1NC -- 1225.. b=U. -
106422 MOERBIGER C.V.M. CALIF. ♦ INC. 0 . COMPRESSOR PARTS
D
40 106923 0N NALD ALD D. MONOMICHL $3 f300.00 DEFBBAlU CORM DISTRIBUTION 18
106425 HORIZON HIGH-REACH $63.95 TRUCK PARTS
106426 P.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. f240.59 PAINT SUPPLIES
106428 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $211.56 RUBBER STAMPS
p. 106429 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHYINN CYCL $201.84 BICYCLE PARTS
L' 06
106431 ENERGY SERVICES GROUP $129.87 ENGINE PARTS
IC6432 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 575.299.70 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-08-89
'10
306439 1Ni]LCO DE GR CMONT♦ INC. f47.897.00 BOB SCREAMS SPEC 8-I18
1
FUND 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19196 PAGE 4 '
REPORT NUMBER AP43
It�I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
n WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106435 INGRAM PAPER f2.03J.18 JUKITOR SUPPLIES
106436 THE IRVINE CO. $3.974.41 REPOIm PLAtl CBECR OYBfl DBPOSIi
106938 GREAT WESTERN 'SANITARY SUPP• $604.71 JANITORIAL.SUPPLIES
i. 106439 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY . .: $549.98. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
IOG 90�DIEF-.11111 1...UCIS bzr.vq --DPFTCE..DP PCf13
U 106441 KALLEENrS COMPUTER SUPPLIES 5725.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES
106442 KAMAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY $36.54 BEARINGS
0
U 106444 MANL EE COMPANY $552.21 PAINT
106995 FLEET EQUIPMENT CORP. S19r650.95 ELECTRIC CARTS
4'u_I06990 I— ... E I FUO700015 ZAP SAFEfY SHOES
106447 KAY-RAY. INC. f854:Be INSTBRIEST PARTS
r 106448 KEITH-STEVENS. INC. $3.077.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES
r
101150 DONALD E. KINNEY 6146.97 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
206451 - KNOT INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES f150.47 GAUGE
I0N052 IML-KULL 6U 999;17 REF09HRTJlN L7BG7'-008R OEPOSEI
FIT MARTIN NORDICK. SP f2.136.3L CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-LB
T106154 KORNLAND BUILDING $837.556 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT
..�.�.ii 106456 LEIGHTON 6 ASSOC. $9.271.61 LAB SERVICES
1� 106457 LE ROY CRANDALL 8 ASSOC. $3.632.59 GEOTECHNICA, SERVICES -
—I0697R LIES RI CDRP9...'ON ...l y O"0l'�NIHpE[ODILE'X•10;FF�p1 _.
J 106459 LIMITORBUE CORP. f6.E60.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
y bD 106460 N.P. LINDSTROM. INC. 34.486.23 CONSULTING SERVICES - MASTER PLAK
• . I A r Di ViTy-ptaw PAR
'r., 106462 LOCAL AGENCY 61.500.On LAM FEE '
�e 106463 LOCAL AGENCY 9750.00 LASED FEE
I ON 959 COElIrC6El1 CIZou.utLA,P.LU FEE
1 106465 MPS $44.41 - PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
nr 306966 MAJOR LOCK SUPPLY $389.50 SAPOTY SUPPLIES -
106460 MARSHALL MAINT. PRODUCTIONS f191.04 INSTRUCIIOHAL VIDBDS
mi 106169. MARVAC .ELECTRONICS S31.22 INSTBUlLL�Nf SW PLIES
w.
1 106471 MCKENNA ENGR. 6 EQUIP. $2.004.93 PRBICNT -_
106472 MCMASTER-CARE SUPPLY CO. 31.413.64 HARI)MARE
ION 74 MOTION INDUSTRIES♦ INC. S203.48 1@CHANICA6 PARTS
1ON 75 MOTOROLA. INC. $669.38 PAGERS
i0647G NOTOPOCR CELLULAR 5EKY10E5 S90 OJ --yECLOLAE T6'CEFH00E SEF.OI LES
106477 NATIONAL LUMBER S554.84 HARDWARE/LIIl1BER
n 1ON78 NA71ONAL PLANT SERVICES, INC. SI.000.00 GENERAL INSPECTION
w 106480 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $9.700.63 PANELING
w
NH
ti
w.
J
FUND NO 91-9 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/1919C PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
M� CUITMS 7TIO-DA72579T-7ffM RG1EA7E-N
-WARRANT NO. - VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
196481, NEAL SUPPLY CO. 581.60 HARDWARE -
LI 106402 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH A4.O, WATER USEAGE
LOS083 UHAKLL4 MIGROLS. --__— MEETING ESPENSN,..
106484 ERIC MIEHUES S2.484.12 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
106485 N.C. NOTTINGHAM CO. INC. $690.00 COSSMMOR SERVIC08 PIPING
106487 O.M.S./SOLA6 DISPOSAL CO 53.872.OU TRASH BIN REMOVAL
u4 106488 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 6295.94 SAPEIY CLASSES
SUBSCRIPTION
106490 DR SYSTEMS CO. 528.379.17 CHLORINE M.O.2-16-90
106491 CYNTHIA OONE1L $38.40 MILEAGE MUSE
TZUEV4 —�37T.89 MEETING F. USE
106493 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $295.55 FITTINGS
1 U6994 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY 5147.76 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
J 355.56 TRUCE PADS
106496 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE $450.00 ROAD STRIPING
106497 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $514.93 FITTINGS -
III6A JH— .AT.Li LWV ♦5£5�35 SPECIALTY GASES
E>C*n 106499 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4.875.01 WASTE HAULER GATE FEES
>C ER 106500 RED COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $6.153.17 DEF COMP DISTRIBUTION
�� fOTi:iDI- "➢'m" ANIMALIDM-U131KILI • . REIMBURSE WORKERS COP INSURANCE
106502 PC MAGAZINE 561.97 SUBSCRIPTION
106503 PSI $952.87 INSTRUMENT!REPAIR
MECHANICAL PARTS
106505 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $3.666.10 SAFETY SUPPLIES
^I 106506 PACIFIC BELL $27.53 TELEPHONE
NSULI - PUBLIC RELATIONS DIST 7 _
106508 PARTS UNL IMTTED 51.624.70 TRUCK PARTS -
106509 ROY PENDERGRAFT $445.00 DEFERRED COP DISTRIBUTION
PROJECTOR REPAIR
106511 PICKWICK PAPER $281.83 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
106512 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS• INC. 544039.10 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 -
--lBS31TNCYuOWES _- ---.--P3T0E7&T-
106514 POLYPUFE. INC. 323.460.18 FILTMERS M.0.1-10.90.8-9-89
106515 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $982.76 ELRCCRIC SUPPLIES
T -
, 1106517 PROCESS EDUIPMENT COMPANY 31.316.P0 SEALS -
106518 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. 54.028.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0 8-10-88-
186520 R M CONTROLS $533.43 CHARTS
106521 R.P.M. ELECTRIC MOTORS 32.631.54 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
------TO16522 .D3 REFUND PLAN CUM OVER DEPOSIT
106523 RECYC. INC. $86.640.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-80
206524 RED VALVE CO.. INC. $2,361.62 VALVE PARTS
T431:09-'— SAPETY SIDE
106526 REPUBLIC ENGINES $146.25 TRUCK PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4119/90 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANSL COUNTY
CCA7AT1+AIb-Di/25740—P"08TiNG-U7TE J972
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT_ DESCRIPTION
�h 106527 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $916.95 ELECTRIC 90PLIES
106528 REMOLD POWER TRANSMISSION $94.32 1RCEANICAL PARTS
1. -1IISS19 �I i TgBB-6-OERS7IDR-- Sfi d• O"_6F_ LECAL SERVICES Y.0.6-11-86
Im E530 ROBERTS 6 SONS CONST. CO. 1484.91 REFUND PLAN CHEM OVER DEPOSIT
-
106531 RODNEY-HUNT CO.. $687.44 GATE PARTS
HOT" IKSIMUMENI 3YRHMENT PARTS
306533 RYAN"ERCO 2272.48 BARIUM
106539 S.R.F. MACHINERY ENG.. INC. S605.63 MECRANICAI PARTS
• S Z ER 3732 BO —. P—M UM
106536 SAFFEL 6 MC ADAM $409.20 REFUND PLAN CHECK OUR DEPOSIT
106537 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT4L 928.432.39 DCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-14-89
P. 71EMT-00. �SOB�II-- �- BEZ'UNp LAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT
l 06539 SRAMROCK SUPPLY SL U65.26 HARDWARE
306590 SNE'HER0 MACHINERY CO. f80.47 ENGINE PARTS
.9 —S'1-.E6739-- - ENCI SERVICES
106542 SKYPARK HALMTIN MEDICAL CLINIC $940.00 PHYSICAL SEARS
106543 SMITH-EMERY CO. S2.967.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-14-89
,H NEE ff -- i52B.PJ SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89
'771 106545 SOUTH COAST DODGE S245.65 TRUCK PARTS
100 ". SOUTHERN ULIF..EO150N CO. $341.123.73 POWER
— 33 • �A
106598 SOUTHERN PACIFIC iP pWATER. CO. s$47.25 MEMENT WATERlD071' 2-26
" 116549 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER • fN.23 DRINKING WATER
,M .• .T.�RSTR R
106551 STAMEN Z. SPASSDFF. P.E. $7.200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162.P1-20.P2-17
106552 YESTALL OY INC. 071 YELLING SUPPLIES
06554 STATER BROS. MARKETS • $6,695.67 REPDMD ?LAW CHEM OVER DEPOSIT
R� 106555 STERLING ART $76.99 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES
DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
uw 106557 SUBI A. INC. S265.63 PRESENTATION AIDS -
. 106558 SUNBELT LANDSCAPE S MAINT. 33.847.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING N.0.8-9-89
..T-106 -TRD
106569 DUPELW INC. S833.09 LAB SUPPLIES
aI 106561 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. S1.4S2.32 TOOLS
106563 TALIN TIRE. INC. • $250.84 TIMES
106564 TAYLOR-DUNN S799.22 TRUCK PARTS
29,5ST S3C6.J3----�
106566 TEKMAR COMPANY S932.71 LAB SUPPLIES
106567 THORPE INSULATION 5504.12 BOLDING MATERIALS
M_ 6 .'BE_._._ Smw Sim
106569 TIME MOTION TOOLS S65.59 SM L TOOLS
106570 TINKER B RASOR S2.090.38 INSTRUMENT
VEL_SER ICES
T 106572 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY, INC. 1234.59 TRUCK PARTS
h�
FUND NO 9119 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4119/90 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
51 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION '
206573 J.G. TUCKER f SON. INC. $1.646.34 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
106574 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTER.INC. $577.16 GLASS -
�+ 101176 THE UNISOURCE•CORP. $304.68 - OFFICE SXPPLIEB
'- 106577 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $145.87 PARCEL SERVICES
i -
106579 VYR SCIENTIFIC $3.322.11 LAG SUPPLIES
106580 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. S9;445.07 FITTINGS
1 • .
S D6582 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP $323.09 LAX SUPPLIES ..
71 106583 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2.697.50 COMP= DATA SUPPORT -
106585 VILLAGE NURSERIES 5280.50 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
IGE586 PALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $319.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES -
A
pp. 106588 CARL WARREN f CO.� SSOV.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR -
_. 106589 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 997.50 PUBLICATION
-.IT1 ]06591 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS. INC. 6332,36 SAFETY SIGN
r. X 106592 YC S TERN PACIFIC I UTPMENT CO. $1.439.66 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
. - -ay
ay
10659q YESTRUX INTERNATIONAL f1 d32.57 TRUCK PARTS
206595 ROURKE G WOODRUFF $39.877.00 LEGAL SERVICES N.0.6-4-89
I-- XEROX •
IM,to 106597 RICHARD B. EDGAR - $TOG-=O- DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
-------
6
lea TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/25/90 S1.668.364.28
v� SUMMARY ANODN'T
01 i 135.72
vi fl 7,065.34
02 5,706.39
W 09 9.IRA-a. _
f5 5,748.40 -
f5 1,791.34
96
wl f6 2.473.93
H 97 34.794.06.
07 47 qg 62
_ All 6,749.59
_ 014 28.456.16
A566 2J87.36
w KG6 271.45 1
f667 11.519.63 ""'
f7614 I,690.44
JT OPER FUND 946,387.45
lug CORF 354,973.08
SELF FUNDED WORKERS CORE INSURANCE FUND 11.743.17
W� JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 186.375.5E
f L6fi8.764.28 � .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) Ss.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting
on 4? 19,& was duly posted for public inspection
at the main lobby of the Districts - offices on �,
19�. n
IN WI�T,NyE1,S�S` WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this C;�
day of 19 pU .
A7 w+V
Rita J. Bro , Secretary of
each of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 , 7 , 11, 13 6
14 of Orange County, California