HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-07-12 M
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
II �J
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10544 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962-2411
FAX(714)982-0366
July 5, 1989
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
WEDNESDAY, JULY 12, 1989 - 7:30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 , 7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and
date.
�y
S teary
Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
ADJOURNED JOINT MEETING - Wednesday, July 19th, at 7: 30 p.m.
Fountain Valley Community Center
10200 Slater Avenue - Hall B
Fountain Valley
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Thursday, July 20th, at 5: 30 p.m.
(NOTE: This is a change from the
regularly-scheduled date of
July 26th)
�y
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
Af ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
IOBAI ELLIS AVENUE
PC BOX 9127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92)`�r
17 111 9 6 2 2at,
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings
July Jul 12, 1989
M . A
AI _
August Aug 09, 1989 None Scheduled
September Sep 13 , 1989 Sep 27 , 1989
October Oct 11 , 1989 Oct 25, 1989
November Nov 08, 1989 None Scheduled
December Dec 13, 1989 None Scheduled
January Jan 10, 1990 Jan 24, 1990
February Feb 14, 1990 Feb 28, 1990
March Mar 14, 1990 Mar 28 , 1990
April Apr 11 , 1990 Apr 25 , 1990
May May 09 , 1990 May 23 , 1990
June Jun 13 , 1990 Jun 27 , 1990
July Jul 11 , 1990 Jul 25, 1990
This is a change from the regularly-scheduled date of
July 26 , 1989 due to a conflict with the League of
California Cities ' Conference being held in Monterey.
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 9272&8127
Telephone:(714)962.2411
V JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 12, 1989 - 7:30 P .M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government
Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written
materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is
proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or
action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or
as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
( 3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts
of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if
any. ( ) NONE RECEIVED
(5 ) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards
on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
(6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel
present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general
interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chairman
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
(7) Annual election of Joint Chairman
v (Nominee: Director Ronald B. Hoesterey)
(8) Annual election of vice Joint Chairman
7/12/89
(9) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the
following minutes will be deemed approved as V
mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman:
District 1 - June 14, 1989 regular
District 2 - June 14, 1989 regular
District 3 - June 14, 1989 regular
District 5 - June 14, 1989 regular
District 6 - June 14, 1989 regular
District 7 - June 14, 1989 regular
District 11 - June 14, 1989 regular
District 13 - June 14, 1989 regular
District 14 - June 14, 1989 regular
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of
claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows:
(Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will
be regarded as the same for each District represented unless l„d
a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any
District. ) See pages "A" and "B" .
6/07/89 6/21/89
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 602,029 .90 $1,047,099 .77
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 3,214,330.61 842,081.28
Joint Working Capital Fund - 126,669 .14 175,031. 33
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 626.79 11,161.01
DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 73 .66
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 627,017 .33 35,965.21
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 376 ,786 .96 25 ,437 .11
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 7,873 .12 _ 7,649 .42
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 3,421 .78 2,870.24
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 7,770.24 6,181.82
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 54.56 6 ,456.97
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 480.00 -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 7, 325 .55 908.53
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 700,101 .86 8,291.25
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 4,960.82 -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 3,123`81 240.00
$5,682,572.47 $2,169,447.60
V
-2-
7/12/89
(11) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 11(a) THROUGH 11(v)
r./
All matters placed on the consent calendar are
considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is
requested to be removed from the consent calendar by
a Director, staff member, or member of the public in
attendance, there will be no separate discussion of
these items. All items on the consent calendar will
be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included
on the consent calendar. All items removed from the
consent calendar shall be considered in the regular
order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item
from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by
the chair, state their name, address and designate
by letter the item to be removed from the consent
calendar.
The Chairman will determine if any items are to be
deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items
,�UC*yp)g appearing on the consent calendar not specifically
p(Cad removed from same, as follows:
tAm�lous Balbt
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of the following resolutions
authorizing and directing execution and filing of
documents necessary for Federal and State Clean
Water Grants and Loans under 33 U.S.C. ,
1251 et seq. ; Chapters 12.5, 13, 14 and 15; and
Division 7 of the California Water Code, and
providing certain assurances in connection with
the 1989-90 Joint Works Improvements and
Additions: See page C.
District No. Resolution No.
1 89-67-1
2 89-68-2
3 89-69-3
5 89-70-5
6 89-71-6
7 89-72-7
11 89-73-11
13 89-74-13
14 89-75-14
-3-
7/12/89 ^ ,
(11 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(b) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding
contract for Blueprinting, Photocopying and
Related Services, Specification No. 5-044, to
Continental Graphics for a one-year period
beginning July 16 , 1989 for a gross annual amount
not to exceed $75,189.00, with option for four
one-year extensions. See page —
ID-(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9
to the plans and specifications for Administration
Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an
addition of $93,125.00 to the contract with
J. R. Roberts Corporation for 13 items of additional
work including interior finish changes, wall
modification and shear reinforcement, additional
roof support under ventilation system air handling
units, construction of separate mailroom,
waterproofing stair No. 3 landing, soffit and wall
addition, Boardroom exterior planter modification,
wheelchair lift enclosure, countertop modifications
and finish work, North Perimeter Road cleanup,
heating and ventilating compressor installation,
steel door frame modification, and addition of
fire-rated ceiling in Plan Storage Room; and
granting a time extension of 34 calendar days for
said additional work. See page "E"
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 17 to the plans and specifications for Ocean
Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15, authorizing an addition of $317 ,661.00 to
the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for
four items of additional work including additional
asphalt paving and gravel for access and parking,
installation of base cove on walls in utility room
and elevator machinery room, modification of a pump
platform due to interference with ventilation duct,
purchase of a 96-inch butterfly valve, modification
of a pipe elbow, reduction of the retained
contractor's funds, and payment of contract-
specified bonuses for early completion of certain
major elements of the project. See page "F"
(e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4
to the plans and specifications for Prepurchase and
Installation of variable Frequency Drive Systems and
Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant
No. 2, Job No. J-15A, authorizing an addition of
$41,052.00 to the contract with General Electric
Company for additional services to set, test and
calibrate 20 sets of existing electrical relays,
modification of wiring in switchgear to adjust
phasing and to calibrate 10 transducers, and
installation of six additional ground fault
protection relays. See page "G"
-4-
7/12/89
(11) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2
to the plans and specifications for warehouse and
Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing
Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an addition
of $50,065.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts
Corporation for overexcavation and recompaction of
soil under Buildings 3 and 4, revisions to
structural steel shop drawings, regrading of
building pads for Buildings 3, 4, 5 and 6 and
rerouting of City of Fountain Valley water line to
avoid an undisclosed concrete encasement; and
granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for
completion of said additional work. See page "H"
(g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 19 to the plans and specifications for Headworks
No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20; and Demolition
of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler;
Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant
No. 1, Job No. PI-31, authorizing an addition of
$34,839.53 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co.
for seven items of additional work including the
addition of landscaping and irrigation piping,
installation of two light fixtures in the North
Road median, cleanup work due to accidental flooding
of contractor's supplies and tools storage area and
reimbursement for damage to contractor's equipment
stored in said area due to failure of Districts'
equipment, repair of groundwater leak at
intersection of existing channel, construction of
concrete retaining wall at Headworks No. 1, grading
of area south of Construction Management office
trailers for future storage, and additional work due
to undisclosed obstructions and utilities at
Digesters 5 and 6. See page "I"
(h) Consideration of the following actions relative to
Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit
Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution
Structure "A", Job No. P2-34:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 15 to the plans and specifications for said
job, authorizing an addition of $96,870.53 to
the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc.
for four items of additional work including
substitution of diaphragm valves for ball
valves in the chlorine piping system;
modifications to the structural aluminum foul
air plenum supports at the scrubber complexes
to avoid interference with ductwork
connections; removal of undisclosed fill
concrete discovered during demolition work at
Headworks "C"; and. extension of Primary
Sedimentation Basin "P" by-pass piping. See
`..� page "J"
[ITEM (11) (h) CONTINUED ON PAGE 6]
-5-
7/12/89
(11) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(h) (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 16 to the plans and specifications for said
job, authorizing an addition of $97,868.43 to
the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc.
for seven items of additional work including
repairs to polyurethane coating of Primary
Sedimentation Basins "P" and "Q"; the purchase
and installation of 48 access hatches for
sampling, maintenance and repair work;
increasing foul air damper shaft size; removal
and relocation of Pflanz Headworks roof drain
piping; installation of temporary stop logs and
guides for the effluent launders to control
leakage; modification of walkways, berms and
railings at Primary Sedimentation Basins "D",
"E", "F" and "G" to comply with current OSHA
regulations; and relocation of undisclosed air
line at Headworks "C". See page "E"
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3
to the plans and specifications for Entrances, Site,
Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-27, authorizing a net addition of
$20,652.88 to the contract with xiewit Pacific Co.
for additional work to reroute the traffic counter
circuit conflicting with asphalt paving grades at
the intersection of Ellis Avenue and the new
entrance, modification of gate control system,
modification of curb at new main entrance,
modifications to Wastehauler Building; City of
Fountain Valley water piping modifications;
modification of the type of directional signs along v
the roadways, and piping modifications for the
restroom addition to the guard shack; and granting a
time extension of 24 calendar days to provide for
delivery of the new directional signs specified.
See page "L"
(j ) Consideration of the following actions relative to
Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for design and
construction services required for Primary Clarifiers
Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-33 providing for additional design
services for relocation of effluent junction box and
polymer facility, realignment of Fuentes Road, and
modifications to the equipment and scum trough
hatches on the primary clarifiers:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee certification
of the final negotiated fee for said additional
services. See page "N"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-76, approving
said Addendum No. 2 to said Agreement with Lee
and Ro Consulting Engineers for said services,
on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead,
plus direct expanses and fixed profit, for a
total amount not to exceed $89,500.00,
increasing the total authorized compensation
from $975,000,00 to an amount not to exceed
$1,064,500.00. See page "N"
-6-
7/12/89
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(k) Consideration of the following actions relative to
Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and 8 at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said
job authorizing a net deduction of $248,380.00
from the contract with S. A. Healy Co. due to
deletion of the bid item for cleaning
Digesters 7 and 8, and providing for
compensation for support services to assist
outside contractor performing said work; and
granting a time extension of 90 calendar days
for delays associated with said project
modification. See page "0"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-77, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and
awarding contract for Cleaning of Digesters 7
and 8 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1-1, to
Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in the total amount of
$171,000.00. See page P.
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3
to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous
Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at
Treatment Plant No, 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing an
addition of $56,157.00 to the contract with
Zisbarth 8 Alper for construction of new utility
trench at chlorination station and modifications to
chlorine solution piping, additional excavation due
v to undisclosed electrical utilities; removal of
interfering wall fittings at Digesters "A" and "E";
and for additional dome liner vents. See page "0"
(m) Consideration of the following actions relative to
Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. 1,
Specification No. R-027-1, and Underground Tank
Replacement at Plant No. 2, Specification
No. R-027-2:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing a net addition of $6,320.00
to the contract with Hekimian 6 Associates, Inc.
for nine Stems of miscellaneous modifications,
deletions and additional work required including
assessment of liquidated damages at the rate of _
5150/day for 60 days due to late completion of
the project; and granting a time extension of
12 calendar days for completion of the
additional work. See page "R"
(2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer s
quantities for removal and disposal of
contaminated soil, for a total addition of
$60,921.12 to the contract with Hekimian 6
Associates, Inc. See page IS.
(3) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-78, accepting
said contract as complete, authorizing execution
of a Notice of Completion and approving Final
Closeout Agreement. See page "T"
-7-
7/12/89
(11 ) ALL DISTRICTS (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(n) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to solicit a proposal and negotiate a
Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo �.✓
Engineers for design and construction services
required for Secondary Treatment Improvements at
Plant 1, Job No. P1-36; and Secondary Treatment
Expansion at Plant 2, Job No. P2-42.
(o) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to South Coast Air Quality Management
District in an amount not to exceed $300,000.00 for
payment of various fees required by SCAQMD
regulations during calendar years 1988 (adopted
retroactively) and 1989, payable during fiscal year
1989-90, estimated as follows:
Type of Fee Amount
Annual Emissions 1988 $61,000
Annual Emissions 1989 73,000
(Fees increased 20%)
Annual Operating Permit 66 ,000
Permit Evaluation - 50,000
Miscellaneous Fees 50,000
TOTAL $300,000
DISTRICT 2
(p) Consideration of motion to receive and file petition
from Herbert Brohn, at al. requesting annexation of
4.76 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of Timkin Lane and Coyote Lane in the City
of Anaheim; and consideration of Resolution
No. 89-97-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to
annex said territory to the District, proposed
Annexation No. 69 - Brohn Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 2. See pages "U" and
nun
DISTRICT 3
(q) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6
to the plans and specifications for Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer Manhole (vault) Rehabilitation at Various
Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1, authorizing an
addition of $19,627.00 to the contract with Mladen
Buntich Construction company for sandblasting and
application of coal tar epoxy coating to 47 manhole v
rings and covers. See page
-8-
7/12/89
(11) DISTRICT 3 (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(r) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny
�.d claims of Magdalen Rueda dated March 13, 1989 , and
Teresa Rueda dated March 15, 1989, for alleged
personal injuries and property damage in undetermined
amounts, due to a traffic accident in connection with
construction of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole
(Vault) Rehabilitation at various Locations, Contract
No. 3-28R-1; and refer to the District' s General
Counsel, liability claims administrator, contractor
and contractor's insurance company for appropriate
action.
DISTRICT 5
(s) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with The Keith
Companies for design and construction services
required re South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract
No. 5-35, and Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract
No. 5-36, to provide for changes in the scope of
work initiated by The Irvine Company, City of Newport
Beach and Laguna Beach County Water District re
project alignment in Pacific Coast Highway and the
construction schedules for said projects (The project
costs are being paid by the proponents) .
ed (t) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny
claim of Hamish Michael dated May 31, 1989 , in
the amount of $248.19 for damage to his auto
windshield from debris, allegedly in connection with
construction of Replacement of Portions of Coast
Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31; and refer to
the District's General Counsel, liability claims
administrator, contractor and contractor' s insurance
company for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 7
(u) Consideration of the following actions relative to
the Professional Services Agreement with Church
Engineering, Inc. for design and construction
services required for Campus Relief Sewer, from
Von Karman Avenue to Jamboree Boulevard, Contract
No. 7-13 :
(1 ) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee
for said services. See page "X,.
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-99-7 ,
approving said agreement with Church
Engineering, Inc. for said services, on an
`J hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus
direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed
profit, for a total amount not to exceed
$43,480 .00. See page "Y"
-9-
7/12/89
( 11 ) DISTRICT 7 (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(v) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-100-7, approving
agreement with County of Orange, providing for the
adjustment of manhole covers and clean-outs on
District sewers in conjunction with the County' s
1988-89 street resurfacing program in unincorporated
County areas within District No. 7, and providing for
payment of the actual cost of the manhole adjustment
plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs for
approximately 279 manholes, at a per-manhole unit
cost not to exceed $220 nor be less than $155 per
manhole; and for clean-outs, at a per-clean-out unit
cost not to exceed $176 nor be less than $125 per
clean-out. See page "2"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Considers ion of action on items deleted from Consent
Calendar, if any
-10-
7/12/89
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Con�der�n of the following actions relative to Sludge
Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-34-2: (See separate Staff Report mailed with
Directors' agenda material)
(a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to
the plans and specifications for said project making
miscellaneous modifications and clarifications.
(b) Report of staff and General Counsel; and consideration
of motion to receive and file Staff Report and
Recommendation re Award of Job No. P1-34-2, dated
July 3, 1989, including the following communications:
(1) "Letter of Protest" dated June 14, 1989,
submitted by Maguire, Toghia a Orbach. on behalf
of Putzmeister, Inc. , objecting to award of
Job No. PI-34-2 to Advanco Constructors due to
the omission of the name of manufacturer of
the cake transfer and loading pumps in their
bid and questioning the legality of wording in
the specifications.
(2) Letter from Advanco Constructors, Inc. dated
May 23, 1989 naming the manufacturer of the cake
transfer and loading pumps omitted from their bid.
( 3) Letter from Chemwest, Inc. , representing Schwing
America, dated May 24, 1989 confirming Advanco's
�..' intent to utilize Schwing America cake transfer
and loading pumps.
.(4) Letter from Monteleone 6 McCrory, attorneys
representing Advanco Constructors, dated June 21 ,
1989 responding to "Letter of Protest" filed on
behalf of Putzmeister, Inc.
( 5) Letter from John Carollo Engineers, Districts'
Engineer, dated June 28, 1989 re evaluation and
design criteria for sludge cake pumping systems.
(6) General Counsel's Memorandum dated June 26 , 1989
responding to the "Letter of Protest" , concluding
that said protest filed by Putzmeister, Inc. is
not meritorius and stating that the Boards have
the authority to award to the low bidder.
(c) Discussion
[ITEM (13 ) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 12]
-11-
7/12/89
(13) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 11)
(d) Consideration of motion either:
(1 ) Rejecting protest of Putzmeister, Inc. re
award of Job No. P1-34-2 to Advanco
Constructors
OR
(2) Sustaining protest of Putzmeister, Inc. ;
rejecting all bids; and ordering that Job
No. P1-34-2 be rebid
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-79, receiving and
RdiCalvote - filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding
of cast contract for said project to Advanco Constructors,
vrmm0us Bab Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. in the total
amount of $19,085,600 .00. See page "AA"
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
(ITEM 14 HAS BEEN DELETED)
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Cons�ation of motion to receive, file and approve staff
Summary Financial Report for nine-month period ending
March 31, 1989 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda
material)
(16 ) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and
consideration of motion to receive, file and approve
the Committee' s written report dated June 29, 1989 re
1989-90 Excess Workers' Compensation insurance policy
renewal (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda
material)
(b) Consideration of motion ratifying action of Fiscal
Policy Committee in placing statutory Excess workers'
Compensation insurance coverage, with $250,000
self-insured retention, effective July 1, 1989, for
an annual premium not to exceed $32,113.00.
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration
of motion to receive, file and approve the
Committee's written report of the meeting on
June 28, 1989 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda
material) .
(ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 13]
-12-
7/12/89
(17) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 12)
(b) Consideration of action on the following items
recommended by the Executive Committee:
(1 ) Individual District Budgets:
(a) Staff report re proposed fiscal year
1989-90 budgets
(b) EACH DISTRICT
Cons; deraElan- of the following resolutions
creating a Capital Facilities Fund and
RollCd vow terminating the Accumulated Capital Outlay
0r Cast Fund and the Facilties Revolving Fund in
Unanimm Ballot each District. See page "BB"
DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO.
1 89-81-1
2 89-82-2
3 89-83-3
5 89-84-5
6 89-85-6
7 89-86-7
11 89-87-11
13 89-88-13
14 89-89-14 (Capital Fund
title change
only)
(c) DISTRICT 1
Rol call vote approving 1989-90 fiscal
year budget in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 9,123 ,000
Capital Facilities Fund 15,177 ,000
Construction Fund 7,082,000
Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1951 70, 875
TOTAL $ 31,452,875
(d) DISTRICT 2
Ro call vote approving 1989-90 fiscal
year budget in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 24,828,000
Capital Facilities Fund 59,579 ,000
Construction Fund 17,268,000
TOTAL $101,675,000
[ITEM (17 ) (b) (1) CONTINUED ON PAGE 141
-13-
7/12/89
(17 ) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 13 )
(b) (1) (a) DISTRICT 3
Roll call vote approving 1989-90 fiscal
year budget in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 24,746,000
Capital Facilities Fund 54,620,000
Construction Fund 18,746 ,000
Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1951 227,000
TOTAL $ 98, 339,000
1MNC (£) DISTRICT 5
^+� Roles-lvote approving 1989-90 fiscal
year budget in the following amounts :
Operating Fund $ 6 ,766,000
Capital Facilities Fund 8,249,000
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1951 52,000
TOTAL $ 15,067,000
(g) DISTRICT 6
RolIca�l vote approving 1989-90 fiscal
year budget in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 5,552,000
Capital Facilities Fund 8 ,826 ,000
TOTAL $ 14, 378,000
(h) DISTRICT 7
Roll cavote approving 1989-90 fiscal
year budget in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 11,262,000
Capital Facilities Fund 25,083 ,000
Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1962 507,112
Bond a Interest Fund - 1970 473,000
TOTAL $ 37, 325,112
(i) DISTRICT 11
A0,
GAl1 �. Roll call vote approving 1989-90 fiscal
year budget in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 7, 302,000
Capital Facilities Fund 10,652,000
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1951 14,000
Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1958 29 ,000
TOTAL $ 17 ,997,000
[ITEM (17 ) (b) (1 ) CONTINUED ON PAGE 15] v
-14-
7/12/89
( 17 ) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 14)
(b) (1 ) (] ) DISTRICT 13
Rol�I—v-ote approving 1989-90 fiscal
u
11�LCBILVOTE year budget in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 743 ,000
Capital Facilities Fund 9 ,947 ,000
TOTAL $ 10,690,000
(k) DISTRICT 14
I LCPI]VOIE^ Ro�ca 'Ivote approving 1989-90 fiscal
year budget in the following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 847,000
Capital Facilities Fund 12,963,000
TOTAL $ 13,810,000
(1) DISTRICTS 1,2 3,5,6 ,7 6 11 (ONLY)
Consi era Sono t e o owing resolutions
CaNVpta establishing the annual Gann appropriations
AoII
or Cast limit for fiscal year 1989-90 for each
UnanorCsBalbt District in accordance with the provisions
Of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California
Government Code. See page "CC"
DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION
1 89-89-1 $ 2,192,000
2 89-90-2 8,153,000
3 89-91-3 10,763,000
5 89-92-5 2,077,000
6 89-93-6 1,287,000
7 89-94-7 3,050,000
11 89-95-11 2,209,000
13 --- Not Applicable
14 --- Not Applicable
(2) Consideration of the following actions relative
to revised Wastewater Discharge Regulations for
the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County:
(Copy of Staff Report and draft uniform Ordinance
included with Directors ' agenda material)
(a) Report of the staff and General Counsel re
proposed new ordinances establishing
wastewater discharge regulations for use of
District sewerage facilities.
(ITEM ( 17 ) (b) (2) CONTINUED ON PAGE 16]
-15-
7/12/89
(17 ) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 15)
(b) (2) (b) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve Staff Report dated June 28,
1989 (Revised) , summarizing revisions to
the Districts - wastewater discharge
regulations.
(c) EACH DISTRICT
Cons ration of actions by each respective
District relative to the following proposed
Ordinances of the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California, Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District
Sewerage Facilities:
Repealing
District Ordinance No. Ordinance No(s) .
1 113 104 & 110
2 208 205 & 207
3 311 306 & 310
5 520 514 & 518
6 614 606, 608 & 610
7 722 718 & 721
11 1110 1106 & 1107
13 1305 1301 & 1304
14 1402 1401
(1) Consideration of motions to read said
Ordinances by title only, and waive
reading of entire ordinances (must be
adopted by unanimous vote of Directors
present in each District)
(2) Consideration of motions to introduce
said Ordinances and pass to second
reading and public hearing on August 9,
1989
( 3 ) Consideration of motions making
findings that adoption of said
Ordinances is categorically exempt
pursuant to California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section
15308, in that the Ordinances are
regulatory actions take:_ by the
Districts to assure the protection of
the environment
[ITEM (17 ) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 17]
-16- d
7/12/69
(17 ) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 16)
(b) ( 3) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve proposal from Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. dated
June 14, 1989 for professional services to
assist the staff with preparation of the
volatile organic compounds (VOC) reduction
demonstration project in order to determine the
best available control technology (BACT) ,
required by SCAQMD in connection with the
Districts' Permit to Construct a 60 mgd primary
treatment expansion at Reclamation Plant No. 1;
and authorizing staff to issue a purchase order
for said services in an amount not to exceed
$140,000.00
(4) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve proposal from Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. dated
June 22, 1989 for professional services to
prepare the Phase I inventory and assessment of
the total air toxic emissions released into the
air by treatment facilities at Plants 1 and 2
and submit to the South Air Quaility Management
District for review and approval, and for
technical support services in connection with
said Phase I work; and authorizing the staff to
issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order
No. 40063, previously issued to Malcolm Pirnie,
Inc. ,. to commence said work in order to meet the
State' s August 1st filing time requirement,
increasing the total amount from $25,000 to an
amount not to exceed $100,000 for completion of
the Phase I work required to comply with AB 2588
(Air Toxics Hot Spots Act)
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff
Report re Agreement with County Assessor re
Supplemental User Fee Processing, dated June 29 , 1989.
See page "DD"
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General
Manager to execute an agreement with the Orange County
Assessor's Office for the purchase/lease of property
file data base services necessary to calculate, assess
and collect the Districts ' supplemental user fee
charges on the annual property tax bills, and
providing for the annual cost for said services to be
fixed by the County Assessor and Board of Supervisors.
-17-
7/12/89 ,
(19) ALL DISTRICTS
Closed Session: During the course of conducting the
business se forth on this agenda as a regular
meeting of the Boards, the chairman may convene the
Boards in closed session to consider matters of
pending or potential litigation, or personnel
matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956 .9
or 54957 .6.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real
property; (b) matters of pending or potential
litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are
exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards
during a permitted closed session and are not
available for public inspection. At such time as
final actions are taken by the Directors on any of
these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session
(c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered
in closed session.
(20) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(21) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7: 30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain valley Community
Center, 10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to
consider the Final Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan
(23) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7 : 30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community
Center, 10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B. Fountain Valley, to
consider the Final Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan
-18- v
7/12/89
(25) DISTRICT 3
o r business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
�.d (26) DISTRICT 3
Con�tion of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community
Center, 10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to
consider the Final Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan
(27) DISTRICT 5
Ot er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 5
ConsTTeiatlon of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community
Center, 10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain valley, to
consider the Final Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan
(29) DISTRICT 11
0—fhe�siness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(30) DISTRICT 11
Consider-a7Eion of motion to adjourn to 7: 30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community
Center, 10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain valley, to
consider the Final Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
-
Plan
(31) DISTRICT 13
0 er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda
Stems, if any
( 32) DISTRICT 13
Cons�ation of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community
Center, 10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain valley, to
consider the Final Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan
( 33) DISTRICTS 6 7 6 14
Consi era ion o the following actions relative to the
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview
Road, Contract No. 14-1-18 (and City of Costa Mesa street
improvements) :
(a) Consideration of motion approving Addenda Nos. 1
and 2 to the plans and specifications for said
project making miscellaneous technical modifications,
transmitting detailed specifications to include City
of Costa Mesa street improvements, providing
additional detailed specifications including work
restrictions during the holiday season, clarifying
r✓ bonus payment provisions and transmitting revised
proposal pages.
[ITEM (33) CONTINUED ON PAGE 20]
-19-
7/12/89
( 33 ) DISTRICTS 6, 7 6 14 (Continued from page 19)
fl0heaii,Vo (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-98, receiving and
filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding
Unanircagmous l contract for said projects to Steve Bubalo
Construction Co. in the total amount of $5, 345,523 . 30.
(City of Costa Mesa to reimburse Districts for their
portion of the project. ) See page "EE"
( 34) DISTRICT 6
Other Su—s-iness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 35) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7 : 30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community
Center, 10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain valley, to
consider the Final Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan
( 36 ) DISTRICT 7
Mer-Susiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 37 ) DISTRICT 7
Con�tion of motion to adjourn to 7 : 30 p.m. , V
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain valley Community
Center, 10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to
consider the Final Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan
( 38) DISTRICT 14
Oter usiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 39 ) DISTRICT 14
Consi<TeraFion of motion to adjourn to 7: 30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19 , 1989 , at the Fountain Valley Community
Center, 10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to
consider the Final Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Faculties Master
Plan
v
-20-
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8427.10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
Meeting Date
July 12, 1989 at 7:30 p.m.
The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine
items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise
self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material
summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
7 and 8: ELECTION OF JOINT CHAIRMAN AND VICE JOINT CHAIRMAN.
As provided in the Joint Boards' Rules of Procedures, nominations for
Joint Chairman were made at the regular June meeting and the election takes
place at the July regular meeting. Vice Joint Chairman Ronald B. Hoesterey was
nominated for the Joint Chairman's past,
Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman will be conducted
immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman.
For the Directors information, we have included below an excerpt from the
current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the
chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization.
118. Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative
rganization.
"A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative
Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts
at the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for
Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June
each year . . . .
"The nominations for Vice Joint Chairman shall be made at the
regular Board meeting in July each year and shall be made
immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman.
-1-
July 12,1989
'The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of a
majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chairman
becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent
prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairman
shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairman and
shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term
unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts.
In the event the office of Vice Chairman becomes vacant prior to
the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election
of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the
next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the
balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a
result of action by a majority of the Districts:'
11(a): AUTHORIZING APPLICATIONS FOR FEDERAL GRANTS/LOANS FOR 1989-90 JOINT
WORKS IMPROVEMENTS AND ADDITIONS.
The routine annual action appearing in the agenda adopts resolutions for
each of the Districts authorizing execution and filing of all documents
necessary for state and federal construction grant and/or loan applications for
1989-90.
11(b): AW
S-
ARD BLUEPRINTING PHOTOCOPYING AND RELATED SERVICES SPECIFICATION NO.
Outside blueprinting, photocopying and related services are used for the
purpose of high volume reproduction of engineering construction project plans
for bidding and various reports and binding services required during the year
that cannot be performed economically with the Districts' copying equipment.
Consolidating purchase of copying services and awarding an annual contract to a
single vendor through the formal bidding process has resulted in a reduction of
staff time and paperwork in individual ordering and invoice processing for
payment of these services each time they are required.
Four bids were received May 2, 1989 for a one-year period beginning
July 16, 1989, with an option for four, one-year extensions. A summary bid
tabulation is attached to the agenda supporting documents. Unit prices bid for
the high volume reproduction services and copying of specifications are 6.5%
lower than the present contract. Unit prices on the remaining items range from
being the same to approximately 6% less than current prices. Based on the
estimated volume of expected future usage, the adjusted gross annual bid amounts
ranged from a low of $74,527.00 to a high of $127,634.00. Continental Graphics,
which affords the Districts a 15% discount on all invoices paid within 30 days,
Is the overall low bidder with an estimated net bid of $63,911.00.
Staff recommends award to Continental Graphics for a one-year contract,
for the gross annual amount not to exceed $75,189.00 for all services bid under
this specification, with an option to renew for up to four, one-year extensions.
11(c): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 TO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION
JOB NO. J-7-4.
Job No. J-7-4, Administration Building Addition, includes the
construction of additional administration building space and remodeling of the
existing administration building, addition of two new parking areas and
-2-
July 12, 1989
associated work at a cost of $3,549,000.00. Change Order No. 9 adds $93,125.00
and 34 calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation.
Item 1 revises the finishes in various rooms in the new South Wing and
existing administration building at the request of staff and the project
architect in order to provide better wearing surfaces over the lifetime of the
new building. These changes include additional floor tile in heavily traveled
areas, upgrading kitchen and bathroom floor coverings and countertop materials,
and painting revisions for an additional cost of $27,386.00. The finishes
included in this change were not shown on the contract plans or included in the
contract specifications. Item 2 directs the contractor to construct a wall to
provide additional support under the second floor of the new South Wing where it
meets the existing administration building. Also included in this item is
additional shear reinforcement along the same wall line required by the project
structural engineer for restraint of lateral forces. The wall framing and shear
wall reinforcement were not shown on the contract drawings and added a cost of
$7,119.00. Item 3 directs the contractor to provide additional support under
the two roof-mounted heating and ventilating air-handling units installed on the
roof of the new South Wing. This change was required by the project structural
engineer because the installed weight of the air handling units was
approximately fifty percent higher than had been anticipated during design of
the project. This item resulted in an additional cost of $16,668.00.
Item 4 adds a new mailroom inside the new South Wing. The mail
processing area was originally designed to be located in the open general office
space. However, this activity is quite noisy and it is deemed advisable to
locate it in a closed area. This additional work added a cost of $10,764.00.
Item 5 directs the contractor to waterproof the top landing of the exterior
stairway on the west side of the new South Wing where it enters the second
floor. The waterproofing was not included in the contract drawings or
specifications and was required by the project architect in order to prevent
water from penetrating the building from the stair landing. The waterproofing
and related work was not included in the contract drawings and specifications
and adds a cost of $3,989.00. Item 6 adds a soffit and wall in the new South
Wing to conceal heating, ventilating and roof drain piping where the piping
penetrates the existing administration building on the south side. This change
was not shown on the contract drawings and was requested by the project
architect at an additional cost of $1,982.00. Item 7 adds a cost of $4,266.00
for modification of the concrete block planter shown on the contract drawings to
be built on the exterior of the boardroom in the new South Wing. This change
requires a new wall and footing to separate the earth in the planter from the
plaster building wall and was requested by the project architect. The planter
detail on the contract plans indicated only single wall construction.
Item 8 directs the contractor to enclose the wheelchair lift for
handicapped persons at the north end of the new South Wing on the second floor.
This change was requested by the project architect and staff to conceal the
unsightly chairlift mechanical equipment. This item resulted in an additional
cost of $3,679.00. Item 9 provides the contractor with additional details
and modifications supplied by the project architect for construction of
countertops and bathroom vanities. These details were not included in the
contract plans or specifications and adds $2,467.00 to the contract. Item 10
adds $1,040.00 for cleanup along the North Perimeter Road from the main entrance
to Fuentes Drive. This special cleanup was requested by staff and not related
-3-
July 12, 1989
to the contract plans or specifications. Item 11 provides for installation of
the heating and ventilating control system air compressor. The location for the
compressor and electrical installation was not included in the contract drawings
or specifications and was required by the project mechanical engineer to provide
for the heating and ventilating system inside the building. This item of work
resulted in an additional cost of $5,313.00.
Item 12 directs the contractor to modify the type of steel door frames
to be installed in the new South Wing from a wrap-around to recessed type. This
was done in order to proceed with completion of interior drywall and finish work
while the contractor is awaiting fabrication and delivery of the steel door
frames. Steel door frame delivery was delayed due to delays in preparing the
building hardware schedule from which the frames are fabricated. (The hardware
schedule was omitted from the plans and specifications.) Modifying the type of
steel door frame will save delay costs greater than the $4,577.00 cost of the
item. Item 13 adds $3,875.00 for construction of a one-hour fire-rated ceiling
in the plan storage room of the new South Wing. The fire-rated ceiling was
required by the project architect and was not shown on the contract drawings or
included in the contract specifications.
The items in this change order are largely design changes made after the
contract was awarded and considered improvements.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 9 adding $93,125.00 and 34
calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation.
11(d): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 17 TO OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-15.
The new $28.5 million master-planned Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at
Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, is being built under several contracts. It includes
five pumps, each capable of pumping 120 mgd to the outfall . The capacity of the
station is 480 mgd with four pumps operating (the fifth pump is a standby, spare
pump). Change Order No. 17 adds $317,661.00 and 74 calendar days to the
contract, of which $240,000.00 is for the early completion bonus provided for in
the contract.
Item 1 is additional paving and gravel for access to the pumping station
and a parking area at the station at a cost of $12,562.00. Item 2 is the
installation of base cove on the walls of the utility and elevator mechanical
rooms at a cost of $278.00. Item 3 is the modification to a pump platform due
to interferences with duct work at a cost of $2,389.00. Item 4 is the purchase
of a new 96-inch butterfly valve and modification of a 60-inch by-pass elbow at
a cost of $62,432.00. The valve is the replacement of an existing, cracked
valve installed many years ago when Surge Tower No. '2 was constructed. The
valve is the connection point for the pump station. A future change order will
include installation charges.
The above changes are either design changes or changes not related to
the job (such as the purchase of the butterfly valve). There are no changes for
work replacement.
Item 5 is a no-cost item and merely provides for the reduction of
retained contractor's funds from $950,000.00 to $50,000.00. All work which can
now be accomplished by the Contractor is complete. The remaining work cannot be
-4-
July 12, 1989
completed until testing of the pumps, motors and variable frequency drives is
finished. That work is being accomplished under a separate contract with
General Electric Co. under Job No. J-15A. Because Advanco has completed all the
work that they can do, staff recommends that the reduction in retention as well
as Item 6, payment of the early completion bonus, be approved. The plans and
specifications provide for payment of the bonus in the amount of $120,000.00 if
the work is completed within 730 days from the notice to proceed. Earlier
completion receive an additional bonus of $2,000.00 per day, with a maximum
payment of $240,000.00. The Notice to Proceed for this project was given
July 20, 1987. The 730-day completion date of the contract would have been
July 21, 1989. However, the contract has been extended 74 days due to previous
change orders. Therefore, the bonus contract completion date is October 4,
1989. Because Advanco's work is substantially complete, the company is eligible
for the maximum bonus of $240,000. There is a minimal amount of work remaining,
but Advanco cannot complete the work until the General Electric contract is
completed, now estimated for the first part of September. GE is delayed by
electrical problems.
Staff has negotiated with Advanco a settlement whereby Advanco will
leave the job site subject to receipt of the maximum bonus, which they have
earned, and the reduction in retention to $50,000. After the GE contract is
completed, Advanco will complete the work and install the butterfly valve
purchased under Item 4 of this change order.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 17 adding $317,661.00
and 74 calendar days to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc.
11(e) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO PREPURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF
VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE 5Y5TEM AND PUMPT FOR OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER
STATION "C" AT PLANT NO, 2, J B NU. J-15A.
In September 1986 General Electric Company was awarded a contract to
provide five pumps, drive shafts and variable frequency drive systems, complete
with all auxiliary equipment, control panels and accessories required for a
complete functional system for the new 480 mgd Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C"
being built at Plant 2. Change Order No. 4 provides an addition of $41,052.00
to this contract.
Item 1 is to set, test and calibrate 20 sets of existing relays pursuant
to a study conducted after the contract was awarded to assure protection of
equipment at a cost of $2,920.00. Item 2 is to modify wiring due to a
difference in Edison Co. power phasing of electrical equipment and to calibrate
transducers sensitive to phasing at a cost of $4,875.00. Item 3 is the
Installation of six additional ground fault protection relays to protect the new
12 KV switchgear at a cost of $33,257.00.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known
prior to its completion. None of the items are for replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for a net addition of
E41,052.00 to the contract with General Electric Company. There is no time
extension associated with this change order.
-5-
July 12, 1989
11(f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING,
ANDI OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J- 0.
Job No. J-20, Warehouse and Maintenance Building, and Oil Storage and
Dispensing Improvements, includes the construction of eight new warehouse and
maintenance buildings, remodeling of the existing oil storage facility and
site paving, storm drain and fire protection systems at a cost of $3,266,000.00.
Change Order No. 2 adds $50,658.00 and 10 calendar days to the contract with
J. R. Roberts Corporation.
Item 1 directs the contractor to remove and recompact existing soils
below the foundations of Buildings 3 and 4. The removal and recompaction,
recommended in the project soils report and directed by the Districts' soils
consultant, was not included in the contract drawings or specifications. This
item resulted in an additional cost of $34,305.00. Item 2 is for revisions to
structural steel shop drawings that were prepared per the bid contract drawings.
The revisions were necessary after the project structural engineer issued a
revised set of drawings two months after construction had begun on the project.
The structural drawings were revised as a result of errors by the project
architect. An added cost of $4,417.00 resulted from this change. Item 3
directs the contractor to regrade and recompact the building pads for Buildings
3, 4, 5 and 6. The sloped floors shown on the contract drawings were eliminated
from buildings which contain offices and bin storage areas. (While the floors
were shown to slope to drain, the designer left out the underground plumbing.
Regrading was the lowest cost alternative available.) This item added a cost of
$9,626.00. Item 4 directs the contractor to reroute installation of a new
6-inch water line in the vicinity of the Chiller Building due to a conflict with
existing utilities. This item of work added $2,310.00.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known
prior to its completion. Item 3 was a staff-directed change.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding $50,658.00 and 10
calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation.
11(g): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 19 TO HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NO. P1-20; AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMENT
OF BOILER; PIPING CLEANOUT • AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 2,
JOB NO. P1- 1.
Job No. PI-20, Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P1-31,
Demolition of Digesters No. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts;
and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new 140
million gallon per day influent pumping plant and preliminary treatment
facilities at a cost of $31,458,000.00, the largest single project ever awarded
by the Districts. Change Order No. 19 includes six items for P1-20 and one item
for P1-31 and adds $34,839.53 to the contract.
For P1-20, Item I is landscaping and irrigation piping along the new
North Perimeter screen wall for $14,115.71. This area was not originally
specified to be landscaped as part of this project due to the possibility of �..i
conflict with an adjacent construction zone. However, that work has been
accomplished ahead of schedule and the contractor was directed to add
-6-
July 12, 1989
landscaping to complete the entire landscaped area along the North Perimeter
Road, thereby ensuring that all the landscaping work would be similar. Item 2,
at a cost of $3,917.74, is for the addition of light fixtures and a pole to the
North Perimeter Road median. The light was not included in the contract
drawings due to an anticipated conflict with the adjacent contruction zone. The
contractor has finished his work in this area ahead of schedule and the
Districts had the opportunity to install these needed fixtures concurrent with
other similar work. Item 3, in the amount of $7,033.92, is for the repair of
the contractor's small tool equipment and restoring the Power Building 3A
basement walls because of water damage which occurred from the build up of water
in the basement due to a District sump pump failure in the early morning hours
during a District shut-down and rerouting of gas compressor cooling water.
Item 4 adds $1,827-.32 for the repair of a ground water leak at the connection of
the existing influent channel and the new by-pass channel . The contract plans
did not include water stop at the connection and, after installation, leakage
was discovered in the new by-pass channel from outside ground water pressures.
Item 5 for $1,803.08 is for the addition of a retaining wall around the
existing air receiver tank at the Chlorine Building. This wall was not shown on
the contract plans and was needed to raise finish grade elevations to ensure
proper drainage and prevent a possible safety hazard in this area. Item 6, in
the amount of $3,259.41, involves the clearing and grubbing of the area just
south of the Districts' Construction Management Trailers. This area will be
designated as a temporary storage yard during the construction of the new
Warehouse Buildings.
P1-31 included one item in the amount of $2,890.27 for extra work
involved when unforeseen utilities at the new paving areas adjacent to Digesters
5 and 6 were encountered.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in
design. None of the items are for replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 19 for a net addition of
$34,839.53 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. There is no time extension
associated with this change order.
11(h) : APPROVE CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 15 AND 16 TO COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB
NO. P1-26; COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-32; FOUL
AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-33; AND IMPROVEMENTS TO
GRIT FACILITY "B", BILLINGS TUNNEL AND DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE "A", JOB
NO. P2-34.
In September 1987 the Directors awarded a contract for construction of
odor control facilities at Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Jobs No. P1-25, P1-26,
1`2-32; P2-33 and P2-34, which provides for domes over all primary clarifier
basins, as well as associated work. The malodorous air will be collected and
deodorized. When this $20 million project is completed, the consulting engineer
believes that odors will be reduced by 95% at the treatment plants.
-7-
July 12, 1989
(1) Change Order No. 15
Change Order No. 15 provides for four items of miscellaneous
changes and adds $96,870.53 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of
$9,718.47, is the substitution of four diaphragm-type isolation valves
in the new chlorine solution piping at Plant No. 2. The ball valves
originally specified would not have provided a tight shutoff during
periods of system isolation. The Districts will retain the ball valves
for other standard uses in the plants. Item 2, in the amount of
$73,877.00, provides for changes in the structural aluminum foul air
plenum supports. Details of the support systems had to be changed to
eliminate interferences with foul air ductwork and a stair structure.
Item 3, in the amount of $6,145.91, is for additional concrete
demolition at Headworks "C" to remove a major amount of fill concrete in
the adjacent effluent channel that was not shown on the contract
drawings. Item 4, in the amount of $7,129.15, extends the by-pass pump
discharge piping at Primary Sedimentation Basin "P". Piping placed
during effluent by-pass operations (when the primary effluent collector
was rehabilitated) interfered with the construction of the new walkways
at Basin "P".
(2) Change Order No. 16
Change Order No. 16 adds seven items of miscellaneous changes and
adds $96,868.43 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $6,999.87, is
for repair of the polyurethane coating in the effluent launders of
Primary Sedimentation Basins "P" and "Q". Large sections of the
existing coating became unattached and had to be repaired prior to the
placement of new dome structures. Item 2, in the amount of $26,883.00,
provides for the addition of 48 access hatches in the flat covers and
scum mechanism enclosures for Primary Sedimentation Basins "A", "B" and
"C". The hatches are required to permit sampling of sewage at various
points in the clarifiers and for the inspection and maintenance of
equipment. Item 3, in the amount of $677.15, increases the size of the
foul air damper shaft. The original size of the typical damper shaft
was too small to adequately attach the operating handle.
Item 4, in the amount of $1,047.42, modifies the existing roof
drain piping at Pflanz Headworks which conflicted with the new main
sewage pump discharge header installation. Item 5, in the amount of
$4,701.82, provides for the installation of stop logs and guides to
supplement use of sandbags in the effluent launders of the basins at
Plant 2 as a temporary measure to prevent leakage of primary effluent
into the underground piping system during the planned rehabilitation of
the underground primary effluent system at Plant 2. Item 6, in the
amount of $56,288.00, is modification of berms, walks and railings at
Primary Sedimentation Basins "D", "E", "P" and "G" at Plant 2. These
modifications were necessary to satisfy current OSHA requirements
regarding clear, unobstructed walkway dimensions. This work was not
addressed in the original contract. (Similar modifications are
necessary on other basins.) Item 7, in the amount of $1,271.17, is for
the relocation of the existing 2-inch air line at Headworks "C" to
eliminate an interference with the new foul air ductwork.
-8-
July 12, 1989
The above-described modifications are considered by staff to be
corrections or changes which would have been included in the original design if
discovered or known prior to completion of design. None of the items are for
replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 15 for an addition of
$96,870.53 and Change Order No. 16 for an addition of $96,868.43 to the contract
with Advanco Constructors, Inc. There is no time extension associated with
these change orders.
11(i): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO ENTRANCES SITE SECURITY AND INTERIOR
ROAD R V MENT N N . 1. N . P1- .
In October 1988 the Directors approved a contract with Kiewit Pacific
Co. for the construction of Job No. P1-27, Entrances, Site, Security and
Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1. This $1.6 million project includes a
new front entrance opposite the southbound 405 freeway off/on ramps and a new
Wastehauler Dump Station. Change Order No. 3 consists of seven items of work
for a net addition of $20,652.88.
Item 1 is the rerouting of an existing traffic counter circuit for the
CALTRANS signalization that conflicted with new paving grades at the
intersection of the new entrance and Ellis Avenue for $6,258.05. The existing
traffic counter circuit was not shown on the contract plans. Item 2 involves
modifications to the gate control system for $9,723.20. The_ gate control
conduit was required to be relocated due to the future removal of an existing
electrical vault which was specified to be used for the conduit on the contract
plans. The vaults will be removed in the future when the new Districts 6, 7
and 14 Baker-Gisler Interceptor is constructed into the plant. Loop detectors,
striping, and card reader pedestals were also modified to better accommodate
operations of the entire gate control system. Item 3 for $744.00 is for curb
modifications at the Guard Shack. As shown on the contract drawings, a conflict
existed between curb and sidewalk elevations requiring removal and replacement
of the curb at the two entrances to the guard shack. Item 4, for $1,498.84, is
for Wastehauler Building modifications, including additional roof exhaust fan
and the relocation of two windows required to accommodate a future project which
will be incorporating a separate sampler room within the Wastehauler Building.
Item 5 involves modifications to the 10-inch city water pipeline at the north
and east property lines. The pipeline was shown on the contract drawings to be
located above ground. During construction it was decided to locate this line
below grade with minor modifications which resulted in a net credit in the
amount of $10,435.45. Item 6 is for directional sign modifications for a net
credit of $2,319.91. The directional signs were modified from internally
illuminated to externally illuminated to better accommodate future changes to
the signs. Item 7 provides new city water supply and drain lines to the 'guard
shack restroon (added in Change Order No. 2) for $15,184.15.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known
prior to its design.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for a net addition of
�./ $20,652.88 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. There is no time extension
associated with this change order.
-9-
July 12, 1989
11(J): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM
N TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE AND RO CONSULTING
ENGINEERS RE PRIMARY LARIFIERS NOS. -15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT
RECLA14ATI N PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-33.
In January 1988, the Directors approved a professional services
agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers to prepare plans and
specifications for 60 mgd of new primary clarifiers and related facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1.
As the design has progressed, the need for additional modifications has
become apparent. The original alignment of the two 108-inch primary effluent
lines and location of the effluent Junction box had to be modified to
accommodate the easement requirements of Southern California Edison. The
polymer facility is also proposed to be relocated based on operational
experience gained since the original design. Fuentes Road will be realigned
along the east side of the new primary clarifiers to facilitate future
expansion needs and to provide better truck access to the relocated polymer .
building. Redesign of the equipment and scum trough hatches on the primary
clarifiers is necessary to provide more convenient access for operations and
maintenance personnel , based on experience with recently reconstructed Basins 1
and 2.
The Selection Committee has negotiated Addendum No. 2 with Lee and Ro
Consulting Engineers for the design of the above-described additional work, in .
the amount of $89,500.00, including direct labor plus overhead at 135%, plus
direct expenses and fixed profit. The Addendum No. 2 will increase the total
authorized professional services contract from $975,000.00 to an amount not to
exceed $1,064,500.00.
Staff recommends that the Boards receive and file the Selection
Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and
adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the professional services
agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers. Copies of the certification
and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents.
11(k): APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 AT
RECLAMATION PLANT N0. 1, J B N P1- 5-1 AND AWARD F ONTRACT FOR
LEANIN OF DIGESTERS 7 AND AT PLAN N 1, OB No. P1- 5-1-1.
In March the Directors awarded Job No. P1-35-1 to S. A. Healy Co. for
the rehabilitation of two digesters at Plant 1. Included in the work was the
cleaning of the two digesters in order to prepare them for rehabilitation. The
bid documents estimated that 6,000 yards of solid material would remain after
the Districts' maintenance staff withdrew the liquid portions from each
digester. However, our pre-extraction was much more effective than anticipated
and, in fact, only 2,506 yards of solid material remained for the contractor
to withdraw.
The contract documents provided a unit price of $49.73 for the
contractor to remove the solid material based on the 6,000-yard estimate. That
figure included the cost of cleaning and trucking and disposal as well as
-10-
July 12, 1989
support activities and general overhead for the work. Because the residual
yardage is substantially less than estimated, the contractor is entitled to
negotiate an increase in the unit price cost for removal in accordance with the
general provisions of the Districts' standard specifications. The contractor
also anticipated labor relations problems associated with the change. Since it
appeared that a substantial savings could be made by deleting the cleaning and
re-bidding same rather than negotiating an increase, staff prepared plans and
specifications and advertised for public bids on a separate digester cleaning
contract, Job No. P1-35-1-1.
(1) Change Order No. 1 to Job No. P1-35-1 deletes the cleaning of the
digesters at a unit bid price of $49.73 for a total deduction of
$298,380.00. The change order also provides that S. A. Healy Co. will
be compensated for providing working space, access and mechanical and
structural support for the project for the amount of $50,000.00 and will
be allowed 90 calendar days for this support. The net deduction for
Change Order No. 1 is $248,380.00.
(2) Bids were advertised, and on June 20, 1989 two proposals were
received for Cleaning of Digesters 7 and 8, Job No. P1-35-1-1. The bids
ranged from a high of $540,000.00 to a low of $171,000.00 submitted by
Dorado Enterprises, Inc. A bid tabulation is attached to the agenda
supporting documents.
The recommended actions are the approval of Change Order No. 1 deleting
$248,380.00 from the contract for Job No. P1-35-1 with S. A. Healy Co. , and the
award of Job No. P1-35-1-1 to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in the low bid amount of
$171.000.00. The savings to the Districts, the difference between the deduct
change order to Job No. P1-35-1 and the award of the contract for the digester
cleaning to Dorado, Job No. PS-35-1-1, is $77,380.00.
11(1): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND
IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, J0B N . P2- 7.
This project includes 38 non-related items of rehabilitation and repair
work at Plant No. 2. Major items of work include replacement of the domes on
Digester "A" and "B", built in the early 19501s; replacement of two influent
pumps at Headworks "C"; the installation of replacement barscreens at Headworks
"C"; replacement of grit augers; screening conveyors; chlorine system piping and
waste activated sludge pumps; new primary influent flow meters; and waste
activated sludge bypass piping. Change Order No. 3 provides for four changes to
the work at Plant No. 2 and adds $56,157.00 to the contract.
Item 1, in the amount of $23,122.00, provides for the construction of a
new utility trench at the existing chlorination station and for minor changes in
the new chlorine solution piping. The new utility trench is needed to provide a
route for the new chlorine solution piping as the existing pipe chase at the
chlorination station is at capacity. Item 2, in the amount of $3,166.00,
provides for additional excavation work at the site of the new Raw Sewage Power
Building to determine the limits of an existing electrical ductbank that
Interfered with the construction of footings for the new building. The existing
ductbank was shown on the plans in a position that would not have interfered
with footing construction. Item 3, in the amount of $29,363.00, provides for
the removal of existing wall fittings in Digesters "A" and "B" that interfered
-11-
July 12, 1989
with the installation of new wall fittings and those that were not to be
re-used. Where fittings were removed the reinforcing steel was re-established
and the holes were filled with concrete. Item 4, in the amount of $506.00,
provides for additional dame liner vents at Digesters "A" and "B". The
additional vents will be used for monitoring the atmosphere between the new PVC
liners and the new concrete domes for leak detection.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be improvements to
the design. None of the items are for replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 adding $56,157.00 to the
contract with Ziebarth and Alper. There is no time extension associated with
this change order.
11(m): APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NOS. 2 AND 3 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
UNDERGROUND TANK REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NO. 1 PE IFI ATION N0. R-027-1
ND U DERGROUND TANK REPLA EMENT AT PLANT N0. FI A 16
N N .
R-027-2 AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE.
In August 1988 the Directors awarded an $877,458.00 contract to
Hekimian 6 Associates for replacement of older, single-walled fuel tanks with
double-walled tanks at both treatment plants to comply with new state laws ,on
underground tanks. The work is complete and the job is ready for close-out.
Change Order No. 2 for nine miscellaneous items, Change Order No. 3 for
adjustment of engineer's quantities and the closeout agreement are presented
for approval.
(1) Change Order No. 2
This change order consists of nine items and grants a 12-day time
extension. Item 1, a credit in the amount of $953.00, is the deletion of
a used lube oil tank heater. Item 2, a credit amount of $5,640.00,
eliminates a new concrete tie-down slab as the existing slab was
determined to be reusable.
Item 3, in the amount of $824.00, is for the removal of an
electrical concrete encased duct bank not shown on the contract plans.
Item 4, in the amount of $8,475.00, is the installation of one additional
manway on six fuel tanks to better accommodate future tank maintenance.
Item 5, in the amount of $3,050.00, is for the removal of residual
material left in five diesel fuel tanks being replaced after draining
that had to be disposed of at a Class I landfill . This material is
considered toxic waste which must be disposed of at a toxic waste dump.
Item 6, in the amount of $2,735.00, is for cutting and replacing
additional reinforcing steel not shown on the plans.
Item 7, in the amount of $5,741.00, and a time extension of 9 days,
is to install separate conduits for the Veeder-Root systems to minimize
electrical interference on the instrumentation. Item 8, in the amount of
$1,088.00 and 3 days time extension, is the addition of stainless steel
product line and fiberglass containment piping along with necessary
electrical conduits that were installed in the new concrete fuel island
so that a future methanol fuel system can be installed with a minimum
amount of revision.
-12-
July 12, 1989
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be
corrections which would have been included in the original design if
discovered or known prior to its completion. None of the items are for
replaced work.
Item 9 is the deduction of $9,000.00 from the contract for
liquidated damages calculated at $150.00 per day for 60 days of late
completion of the contract.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding a net of
$6,320.00 and 12 calendar days to the contract.
(2) Change Order No. 3
Change Order No. 3 is the adjustment of engineer's quantities to
accurately reflect final quantities of materials actually used in the
construction of Specifications Nos. R-027-1 and R-027-2. The
specifications estimated that 100 tons of contaminated soil would be
found at each plant, actual amounts were 302 tans at Plant 1 and 289
tons at Plant 2. The change order is in the amount of $60,921.12 for
removal and disposal of the additional contaminated soil .
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 adding $60,921.12
to the contract. There is no time extension associated with this change
order.
(3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete
Hekimian 8 Associates has fulfilled all contractual obligations.
Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the
agenda material , authorizing acceptance of the work as complete,
execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of
Completion as required. The final project cost is $849,241.12.
11(n) : AUTHORIZE THE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT
IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT 1, JOB NO. P1-36 AND SECONDARY EXPANSION AT PLANT
NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-42.
The Districts effluent quality requirements are dictated by the NPDES
ocean discharge permit which limits the mass emission rates of the so-called
conventional pollutants, consisting of suspended solids to 180,000 lbs/day and
biochemical oxygen demand to 189,000 lbs/day; as well as other constituents such
as heavy metals. The existing permit expires in February 1990, and application
for permit renewal is a part of the Action Plan currently under consideration by
the Boards.
Based upon the engineering evaluations conducted as part of the Action
Plan Facilities Master Plan (Volumes 2, 5 and 6) , expansion of the Districts
existing secondary treatment facilities must be accomplished under either
Scenario 2 (50% secondary treatment) or Scenario 3 (100% secondary treatment) to
enable ongoing compliance with NPDES ocean discharge permit requirements of the
Federal Environmental Protection Agency and the State Regional Water Quality
Control Board. The secondary treatment capacity for the Districts' two
treatment facilities is currently 141 mgd. The necessary improvements will
-13-
July 12, 1989
result in additional secondary treatment capacity of 49 mgd, increasing the
secondary treatment capacity to 190 mgd between the two plants. Total treatment
capability (advanced primary and secondary) of the two plants is currently rated
at 285 mgd).
The Plant 1 activated sludge treatment facilities, built under Job No.
P1-16 in 1978 to handle 46 mgd constant flow, are proposed to be expanded to 80
mgd of secondary treatment capacity (Plant No. 1 also has 20 mgd of trickling
filter secondary treatment capacity). The proposed expansion includes ten new
secondary clarifiers, an upgraded air diffuser system, additional air headers,
one new air blower (electric motor driven) , sludge pumping and piping
Improvements, associated auxiliary requirements including converting primary
effluent pump station engine driven equipment to electric motor driven variable
frequency drive, replacing engine driven blowers with a constant speed motor
drive, and an additional power building to supply the increased electrical power
requirements which will be supplied by the central generation facilities. To
accommodate the additional sludge produced under this expansion, three new
40-foot diameter Dissolved Air Flotation (OAF) units (including domes for odor
control) and modifications to the existing three DAF's to enhance their
performance is recommended. The Master Plan also addresses the need for a
centralized Distributed Control System (OCS) which calls for Satellite Control
Stations (SCS) for individual processes. Under this project the first SCS will
be installed under the separate Job No. J-23-1.
The Plant No. 2 secondary facilities, built under P2-23-6 in 1983 to
handle 75 mgd constant flow is proposed for expansion to 90 mgd. The 14 mgd
expansion will require no additional secondary clarifiers to be built; however,
to accommodate the increased flow, the existing clarifier launders will be
extended (lengthened) by approximately 50 feet. This will include modifications
to the chains and flight mechanisms, and expanded sludge systems. Additional
auxiliary facilities include one additional DAF (55-foot diameter) with dome,
and modifications to the existing DAF's to enhance performance. A satellite
control station, similar to Plant No. 1, will also be incorporated into the
design.
Other projects which will be included under this design contract include
electrification (elimination of internal combustion engines) of plant water pump
station and primary effluent pump station engines with motor-driven variable
frequency drives. The electrification element as well as these engine
conversions to electric motors above are to comply with SCAQMD requirements due
to the start-up of the Central Generation Facilities (J-19-1/-2).
The data accumulated during the design of the project will be used in
conjunction with the cooperative multi-agency pilot effort to aid in
streamlining the processing of necessary permits for such projects. This pilot
effort includes the Districts, SCAQMD, RWQCB, EPA and SCAG. This data, along
with data from other agencies, will provide the baseline data necessary to
eliminate the delays currently inherent in the permitting system.
John Carollo Engineers (JCE) designed the existing secondary treatment
facilities at both Plants Nos. 1 and 2 that are proposed to be expanded under
this project. This firm has a history of providing quality engineering 14�
services to the Districts for many years. Some of their most recent major
-14-
July 12, 1989
engineering projects include the Ocean Outfall -Booster Station, Headworks No. 2
at Plant No. 1, Digesters 11 - 16 at Plant No. 1, and Sludge Handling Facilities
at Plant No. 1. Because of their previous experience, JCE is most qualified to
design this project.
Therefore, staff recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized
to negotiate a professional services agreement with John Carollo Engineers for
expansion and improvements of secondary treatment facilities, Jobs Nos. P1-36
and P2-42. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the agreement will
be presented to the Boards for consideration.
11(o): AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF SCAQMD FEES.
In 1988, the California Clean Air Act expanded the SCAQMD's authority to
assess and collect fees from public agencies for permit applications, annual
operating permits, annual emissions fees and other fees. Certain of these fees
have retroactive applicability to 1988. Previously the Districts have only been
subject to fees for evaluation of applications for Permits to Construct.
The Districts' staff has estimated the anticipated fees for Fiscal 89/90
to be $300,000. The retroactive 1988 emissions fees are due by July 28, 1989.
In addition, the calendar 1989 fees will be due in March 1990. The total
estimated fees payable in fiscal year 1989-90 are as follows:
Type of Fee Estimated Amount
Annual Emissions Fee - 1988 $ 61,000
Annual Emissions Fee - 1989 (Fees increased 20%) 73,000
Annual Operating Permit Fees 66,000
Permit Evaluation Fees 50,000
Miscellaneous Other Fees 50,000
Total $300,000
Staff is requesting authorization to issue a blanket purchase order to
SCAQMD and to pay all applicable fees for 1988/89/90 in compliance with SCAQMD's
fee regulations.
DISTRICT 2
11(p) : INITIATING ANNEXATION NO. 69 - BROHN ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 2.
The District has received a request from Herbert Brohn to annex 4.76
acres of territory in the vicinity of Timkin Lane and Coyote Lane in the City of
Anaheim. There are currently seven single family residences on this parcel .
The City of Anaheim is the local sewering entity. The annexation would be in
accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange
re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution initiating proceedings for
said Annexation No. 69 included with the agenda material .
-15-
July 12, 1989
DISTRICT 3
11(q): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE
A REHABILITATION VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO.
This project is for the repair of 79 sewer manhole vaults from Treatment
Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach to Rosecrans Avenue at Beach Boulevard. The
vaults on these sewers built in the late 1950's and early 1960's have
deteriorated over the years from the effects of sulfides in the sewage. The
work basically consists of structural rehabilitation of the manholes and
application of a PVC coating to protect against future corrosion.
Change Order No. 6, in the amount of $19,627.00, is for the sandblasting
and application of coal tar epoxy to the interior of 47 manhole cast iron frames
and covers. Due to the severe corrosion from the sewer gas which has
accelerated the deterioration of the frames and covers, it is recommended that
the coating be applied to the interiors of the new frames and covers to prolong
the useful life and thereby reduce maintenance costs. The practice of coating
the cast iron frames is new. The work was not in the original contract.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 adding $19,627.00 to the
contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company. No time extension is
required for this change order.
11(r) : RECEIVE, FILE AND DENY CLAIM OF MAGDALEN AND TERESA RUEDA RE CONTRACT
R-1.
The District has received a claim from the attorney for Magdalen and
Teresa Rueda dated March 15, 1989, for personal and property damages in an
unknown amount, allegedly due to a traffic accident in the vicinity of Hazard
Avenue and Chestnut Street in connection with construction of the Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No.
3-28R-1.
The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny
the claim and refer it to District's liability claims administrator, General
Counsel , contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 5
11(s) : AUTHORIZE THE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES FOR DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RELATIVE TO SOUTH COAST TRUNK SEWER, NTRACT
N - 5, AND CRYSTAL COVE PUMP ION, CONTRA T N 5-
In May 1988, the Directors approved a professional services agreement
for design and construction services with The Keith Companies for the extension
of sewer service to the developing areas south of Corona del Mar, Contracts
Nos. 5-35 and 5-36. The project has required extensive coordination between
staff, CALTRANS, The Irvine Company, the City of Newport Beach, Irvine Ranch
Water District (IRWD) , Laguna Beach County Water District, RBF Engineering
(designer of sewer improvements within the City of Newport Beach) , The Keith
Companies, and others. Although design has proceeded and is essentially
-16-
July 12, 1989
�../ complete, several plan changes are necessary which were initiated by the City of
Newport Beach, The Irvine Company and Laguna Beach County Water District, none
of which were anticipated or controlled by the District. This project is funded
under a reimbursement agreement with the IRWD.
One of the planned changes involves splitting the proposed construction
of the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, into two phases; Contract
Nos. 5-35-1 and 5-35-2, because of alignment and coordination problems involving
the Laguna Beach County Water District's potable water line. Another involves a
recent requirement for widening and changing the vertical profile of Pacific
Coast Highway (PCH) , including a 100-foot wide scenic corridor through the
Crystal Cove section which would affect the pump station. A third proposed
change is to locate a portion of the South Coast Trunk Sewer in the median of
PCH inside the city limits of Newport Beach (Corona del Mar) and delaying
construction until after Pelican Hill Road is constructed.
Staff is, therefore, recommending that the Selection Committee be
authorized to negotiated an addendum for the additional engineering services
required in order to effect the changes discussed above. Following the
Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to
the Board for consideration.
11(t): RECEIVE, FILE AND DENY CLAIM SUBMITTED BY HAMISH MICHAEL.
The District has received a claim from Hamish Michael dated May 31,
1989, for damages to the windshield of his vehicle due to flying debris from the
highway, allegedly in connection with construction of Replacement of Portions of
Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31. The amount of this claim is for
$248.19.
The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny
the claim and refer it to the District's liability claims adminstrator, General
Counsel , contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 7
11(u) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH ENGINEERING RE CAMPUS RELIEF
SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-13.
In June the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate a
professional services agreement with Church Engineering for the preparation of
plans and specifications for the Campus Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-13.
This project, identified in the 1983 Master Plan and reaffirmed in the
1989 Master Plan, is the construction of a relief sewer in Campus Drive from
the Von Karman Trunk Sewer easterly through Jamboree Boulevard. The project
will serve a relatively large redevelopment of areas easterly of Jamboree
Boulevard both north and south of Campus Drive.
Church Engineering is designing the private sewer system to serve a large
residential and commercial development on the northeast corner of the
�./ intersection of Campus Drive and Jamboree Boulevard. Plans are being formulated
for the development of a large commercial project located on the southeast
corner of the same intersection to be developed in conjunction with University
of California-Irvine.
-17-
July 12, 1989
The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee for the preparation of plans `/
and specifications for the Campus Relief Sewer for an amount not to exceed
$43,480.00, including direct labor plus overhead at 140%, plus direct expenses,
subconsultants and fixed profit.
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the
Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work
and adoption of a resolution approving the professional services agreement with
Church Engineering for Campus Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-13. Copies of the
certification and resolution are attached with the agenda supporting documents.
DISTRICT 7
11(v) : APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR ADJUSTING MANHOLES AND
CLEAN-OUTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH UN 1 ROAD RESURFA IN
PR
In 1986 the Directors approved an agreement with the County of Orange
which provided for adjustment of manhole covers on District sewers in
conjunction with the County's road resurfacing program in the unincorporated
areas within District 7. That agreement, which was amended as additional County
projects went to contract, included the County's projects for 1985-86 and
1986-87. A new agreement with the County was approved in December 1987 for the
1987-88 resurfacing program.
An agreement has been proposed by the County of Orange to cover work
under contracts authorized in the 1988-89 fiscal year. The agreement provides
for the adjustment of approximately 279 manholes and four clean-outs at the
County contractor's actual cost, with a maximum cast of $200 per manhole and a
minimum cost of $155; and with a maximum cost of $160 per clean-out and a
minimum cost of $125; plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs. The
previous agreements have been very satisfactory from the District's standpoint.
It eliminates duplication of contracting efforts and provides a very favorable
cost arrangement.
Staff recommends approval of the 1988-89 manholes and clean-outs
adjustment agreement with the County of Orange Environmental Management Agency.
ALL DISTRICTS
13: AWARD OF SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 JOB
NO. P1- 4- .
Enclosed with the agenda material is a separate Staff Report and
Recommendation re award of a contract for Sludge Handling Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2.
14: (This item has been deleted.)
15: FINANCIAL REPORT FOR NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1989.
Enclosed are the budgetary financial statements through nine months of
the fiscal year. The Joint Operating Budget was reviewed by the Fiscal Policy
Committee on May 18, 1989. If any Directors have questions on the statements,
please call Gary Streed, Acting Director of Finance at (714) 962-2411,
extension 212.
-18-
July 12, 1989
16: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE RE 1989-90
WORKERS' COMPENSA N EXCESS-INSURANCE COVERAGE.
The Workers' Compensation excess coverage (stop-loss) insurance policy
expired on July 1, 1989. At last month's meeting it was reported that because
of the way the insurance marketplace works, quotations for the 1989-90 coverage
were not received in time for consideration by the Boards at the regular June
meeting. Inasmuch as the coverage was scheduled to expire between the Boards'
June 14th and July 12th regular meetings, the Boards authorized the Fiscal
Policy Committee to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts' insurance
broker and place appropriate excess workers' compensation coverage effective
July 12, 1989. The authorization provided that the action taken by the Fiscal
Policy Committee would be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or
revision at the regular meeting on July 12th. This is similar to procedures
followed by the Boards in past years.
Enclosed with the agenda material is the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendation and action in placing the Workers' Compensation excess coverage
insurance effective July 1, 1989 for consideration by the Boards. The items
appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the report and ratify the
Committee's action.
ALL DISTRICTS
17: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING.
The Executive Committee met on June 28, 1989. Enclosed for the
Directors is a written report on its discussions and recommendations for
consideration by the Boards.
18: AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY ASSESSOR RE SUPPLEMENTAL USER FEE
PROCESSING.
Attached to the agenda supporting documents is a separate staff report
and recommendation requesting authorization for the General Manager to negotiate
and execute an agreement with the County Assessor for property file data base
extraction services to enable the Districts' to calculate, assess and collect
their supplemental sewer user fees on the annual property tax bill .
19: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION.
From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed
session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending
litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public
disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a
situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda,
this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed
session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards.
22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 35, 37 and 39: ADJOURN TO 7:30 P.M. JULY 19 1989 AT
FOUNTAIN VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER T NSI DER FINAL EIR ON ACTI N PLAN
AND DETERMINATION ON NPDES PERMIT RENEWTE7UNUITION5.
The Joint Boards will adjourn to July 19, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. to consider
the Final EIR on the Districts' "Action Plan" Wastewater Management Program and
-19-
July 12, 1989
a determination on the terms of our application to the U.S. EPA and the State
Regional Water Quality Control Board for renewal of the Districts' NPDES Ocean
Discharge Permit.
The meeting will be held at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200
Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley. It is located behind City Hall , two
blocks east of Brookhurst.
DISTRICTS 6, 7 AND 14
33: APPROVE ADDENDA 1 AND 2 AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR,
FROM BRISTOL STREET TO FAIRVIEW ROAD, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1B.
The Baker-Gisler Interceptor project includes the construction of force
main sewers and gravity trunk sewers from the Main Street Pump Station located
within the "Clear Zone" of the John Wayne Airport to Reclamation Plan No. 1 in
Fountain Valley. A 90-inch sewer is planned between the Fountain Valley
Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1A; an 81-inch
trunk sewer between Fairview Road and Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-1B; and
dual 42-inch force mains in Baker Street between Bristol Street and the Main
Street Pump Station, Contract No. 14-1-2. (The right-of-way schedule for the
Districts' acquisition of several parcels affecting the construction of the
Baker-Gisler Interceptor between Plant 1 and Fairview Road may delay the award
of Contract No. 14-1-1A.) The project will benefit Districts 6, 7 and 14 and
will provide the lowest cost construction per unit of capacity possible.
In June 1988, the Directors authorized staff to negotiate with the City
of Costa Mesa to include the reconstruction of Baker Street between Fairview
Road and Bristol Street in this contract. In order to meet time constraints,
the contract has been divided into the three separate contracts to facilitate
the inclusion of the City's street widening project. The City will reimburse
the Districts for this work.
The Directors have previously discussed several allocation formulas for
this and other District projects based on capacity and recommended standards in
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. It is
recommended that costs for projects of more than a single District be allocated
on the basis of capacity. The approximate cost of this project, based on
capacity, is allocated as follows:
CSD No. 6 $ 25,000.00
CSD No. 7 1,177,000.00
CSD No. 14 3,016,441.00
Subtotal 4, 18,441.00 (Cont. 14-1-1B)
City of Costa Mesa $1,127,082.30 (Street Imprvmnts)
Total 5,345,523.30
The above allocation is based on cost sharing solely on capacity
projections. Actual cost will be higher since design and construction
management charges are not included above.
-20-
July 12, 1989
(1) Addenda Nos. 1 and 2
Addendum No. 1 transmitted information to bidders regarding the
street reconstruction project for the City of Costa Mesa. The
information was not available at the time the plans and specifications
were originally printed.
Addendum No. 2 clarified the bonus payment provisions of the
specifications. The bonus amount, $500 per day as an incentive for
early completion, had been omitted in the original documents. The
addendum also corrected two bid quantity items.
Staff recommends approval of Addenda 1 and 2.
(2) Contract Award
On June 20, 1989 six bids were received for the Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Baker Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B.
The bids ranged from a high of $6,839,384.00 to a low of $5,345,523.30,
submitted by Steve Bubalo Construction Co. A complete bid tabulation is
attached to the agenda. The Engineer's estimate for this work was
$8,000,000 which includes the City's street improvement project.
Staff recommends award of Contract No. 14-1-1B to Steve Bubalo
Construction Co., of Monrovia, for their low bid amount of
$5,345,523.30.
-21-
'RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
BI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA .
July 3, 1989
10844 BLUE AVENUE
R 0.BOX 0127
�. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 82728.8127
(7141862.2411
STAFF REPORT
RECOMMENDATION RE AWARD OF SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1- -
Background
In February, the Directors approved plans and specifications for sludge handling
facilities at Plant No. 1. The existing sludge storage and truck loading
facility has reached its limits to accommodate increasing sludge production and
reasonable storage, and is also unsafe due to new seismic standards.
Replacing this facility will accommodate the increased sludge production for the
upcoming 60 mild primary treatment expansion and increase storage capacity which
will provide flexibility for operation of Plant No. 1. Additional work includes
replacing the existing sludge conveyor belt system with a sludge cake pump
transfer pipeline to the new sludge storage and truck loading facility.
Eliminating these belts will reduce the amount of fugitive odors which occur
when transferring sludge and reduce the amount of foul air which needs to be
scrubbed. The project also includes modification of sludge transfer equipment,
construction of a new 12 kv service center, plant water pump station, and
electrical distribution center No. 6. The new 12 kv service center will allow
connection of a new Southern California Edison service and will supply power for
plant-wide expansion and increase overall reliability. The existing plant water
pump station has exceeded its normal mechanical life expectancy. This new pump
station will replace older equipment, and the design allows for future plant
expansion needs.
Approval. of Addendum No. 1
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Sludge Handling Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1 deletes the use of an automatic halon fire suppression
system in an area which does not need this high level of protection. The
addendum also clarifies the size and material for cable trays throughout the new
tunnels and building and adds requirements to facilitate the electrical
connection for power which will be produced at the new Central Generation
System (J-19-1).
Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1.
Protest by Putzmelster re Award of Job No. P1-34-2 to Advanco
On May 23, 1989, six bids were received for Sludge Handling Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2. The bids ranged from a high of
$23,691,524.00 to a low of $19,085,600.00, submitted by Advanco Constructors,
Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. of Upland, California. A complete bid
tabulation is attached hereto.
On June 14, 1989, a letter protesting award of the contract to Advanco was
submitted by the law firm of Maguire, Toghia and Orbach (copy attached) on
behalf of Putzmeister, Inc., one of two sludge pump manufacturers listed in the
specifications. The other listed sludge pump supplier is Schwing America.
Putzmeister and Schwing were the only listed suppliers because the design
engineer determined after a thorough study and evaluation that they were the
only two manufacturers with demonstrated equipment capable of meeting the
Districts' sludge cake pumping requirements that also had service capability
In the United States (see attached letter from John Carollo Engineers). These
types of sludge cake pumping systems are relatively new technology actually
pioneered by the Districts' testing on Putzmeister equipment, utilizing what are
basically pumps for concrete.
Putzmeister is protesting because (1) they point out that Advanco failed to name
the selected pump supplier in their bid; , (2) they claim that the specified pumps
are not equal , professing that the Putzmeister is "Cadillac" and the Schwing is
a "Chevrolet"; and (3) they claim that the specifications should have included
an "or equal" clause (even though they were one of the manufacturers specified
and named).
The specifications required that the contractor list the manufacturer of
the cake transfer and loading pumps and submit the name with the bid.
Advanco listed manufacturers for all equipment except the sludge cake
transfer and loading pumps. Advanco called the Districts' Director of
Engineering immediately after the bid opening to report that they had
selected Schwing and confirming letters from both Schwing and Advanco were
received (see attached letters from Advanco dated May 23, 1989, from
Chemwest, Inc. [Schwing representative] dated May 24, 1989, and Monteleone
& McCrory, attorneys representing Advanco, dated June 21, 1989.) There is
no statutory provision for contractor's to name equipment suppliers. In
this case, it was specified in the Districts' documents because there were
only two manufacturers that could supply the necessary equipment. Even
though the contractor did not name the supplier, he is bound to furnish
equipment only from one of the two named suppliers. Counsel has ruled the
Board may waive the irregularity of not having named the selected supplier
in the bid.
With regard to Putzmeister's claim that the Schwing and Putzmeister pumps
are not equal , as referenced above the Districts' consulting design
engineers, John Carollo Engineers, believe that both pumps are equally
capable of handling the Districts' sludge cake pumping requirements.
Concerning the "or equal " clause, the California Public Contracts Code,
Section 3400, specifically allows limiting equipment suppliers when the
application is unique or where known suppliers are limited.
The General Counsel has reviewed the protest and the facts, and attached hereto
is a memorandum to the Directors from Clark Ide of the General Counsel 's office.
In summary, counsel has concluded that the protest filed by Putzmeister is not
meritorious and that the Board has the authority to award the contract to
Advanco Constructors.
`/ -2-
Recommended Award of Job No. P1-34-2
The Districts have no particular preference for one pump supplier over the
other. The consulting design engineers determined that both Putzmeister and
Schwing equipment can do the sludge cake pumping and loading job and both have
service capabilities in the United States. Having at least two manufacturers
that could meet the specifications allowed for competitive bidding on the
project for this equipment.
It appears as if Putzmeister is merely seeking to prevent award of the contract,
because their quote on this $2,000,000 worth of equipment was not the low quote,
so that the project would have to be rebid and they would have a second chance.
Staff therefore recommends that the Putzmeister protest be rejected and that the
contract be awarded to Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc.
for their low bid amount of $19,085,600.00. The Engineer's estimate for this
work was $22,400,000.
-3-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
May 23, 1989
11:00 a.m. 10BAA ELLIS AVENUE
ONE ADDENDUM Pa 90.8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272S-9127
B I D T A B U L A T I O N n+AI 992�2A11
S H E E T
JOB NO. P1-34-2
PROJECT TITLE Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION New Truck Loading Facility, Sludge Transfer System,
Plant Water Pump Station, and 12 KV Service Center
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 22.4 Million BUDGET AMOUNT $ 24.0 Million
CONTRACTORTOTAL BID
1. Advanco Constructors, Div. of $19,085,600.00
Zurn Constructors, Inc. , Upland, CA
2. Brinderson Corporation, Irvine, CA $19,730,000.00
3. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. $19,800,000.00
Camarillo, CA
4. Steve P. Rados, Inc. , Santa Ana, CA $20,686,289.00
5. Kiewit Pacific Co. , Santa Fe Springs, CA $20,882,000.00
6. S. A. Healy Co. , Azusa, CA $23,691,524.00
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the
low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Advanco
Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. in the bid amount of
$19,085,600.00 as the lowest and best bid.
i
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
MAGUIRE , TOGHIA 6 ORBACH
LAWYERS
W. Maa ulRe of COUNSEL
wlL
N ICM OLAS J.TDO MIA OBOe WILSHIRE BOULEVARD,SUITE 300 I M0.MLOUIR[
AVID M.OR[A.. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA S00E4-4303 TEUI.....
1.0,.1......
B�ERMEN L.oMEeNE.
Bu[.N R. ....1. June 14, 1989 "`�
no,
J[FFLA� .DAVIS LMAN
A.
MATTMEw J..&A.[ARAN '
Board of Directors DELIVERED BY MESSENGER
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re: County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
Project: Sludge Handling Facilities
at Reclamation Plant No. 1
Job No. P1-34-2 . Bid Date: May 23 , 1989
Dear Members of the Board:
This writing is a formal "Letter of Protest'- submitted by and
on behalf of our client, Putzmeister, Inc. , with reference to the
bid of Advanco on the above-captioned project not listing in its
bid a manufacturer of the Cake Transfer and Loading Pumps as
required by the Bid Documents.
Bids on the above-referenced project were to be submitted by
May 23, 1989, at 11:00 A.M. The bid submitted by the lowest
monetary bidder/general contractor (Advanco) , did not list in its
bid the name of a manufacturer of the Cake Transfer and Loading
Pumps as required by the Bid Documents. The bid documents prepared
and published by the District for the project provided as follows
(at page 9) :
"The name of the manufacturer of each piece of equipment
listed below that will be installed in this project is set
forth below. Only one manufacturer of each item shall be
listed and all blanks shall be completed ." (emphasis
added) .
Putzmeister, Inc. objects to and protests any decision by the
District to permit Advanco to list a manufacturer as the
supplier/manufacturer of the Cake Transfer and Loading Pumps after
11:00 A.M. on May 23, 1989. Permitting Advanco to list a
manufacturer of said pumps after the bid time had closed gives
Advanco an unfair and decisive advantage by allowing it to further
negotiate with manufacturers after it was known that it was the
lowest monetary bidder, all to the detriment of the other bidders
and Putzmeister, Inc. The District's requirement in its Bid
i Documents requiring the listing of manufacturers, is similar to the
Board of Directors, County Sanitation _
Districts of Orange County, California
June 14, 1989
Page 2
requirement to list subcontractors on public works projects (Public
Contract Code Section 4100 et seq.) , wherein it is stated in
Section 4101 as follows:
"The Legislature finds that the practices of bid shopping and
bid peddling in connection with the construction, alteration,
and repair of public improvements often result in poor quality
of material and workmanship to the detriment of the public,
deprive the public of the full benefits of fair competition
among prime contractors and subcontractors, and lead to
insolvencies, loss of wages to employees, and other evils. "
Since the bid documents, prepared and published by the
District required bidders to list the name of the manufacturer in
their bids, the late submittal of a manufacturer cannot lawfully
be permitted. There are cases in other states which indicate
failure- to properly list subcontractors as rewired by the bid
documents ,renders the bid void. Druml Co. . Inc. v. Knapp, 6 Wis
2d 418, 94 NW 2d 615 (1959) . Of course in California, by statute,
the general contractor is required to perform all items of work
with his own forces for which he failed to list a subcontractor
(Public Contract Code §4106) .
In National Engineering 6 Contracting Co. v. City of
Cleveland, 76 Ohio L.Abs. 303 , 146 N.E.2d 340 (1957) , it was held
that where an invitation to bid for construction of a city
incinerator required that each bid be accompanied with appropriate
data, sketches, drawings, sales specs. , etc, (so that a true and
thorough evaluation analysis of bid might be made) , and a city
ordinance required that contract be let to lowest responsible
bidder after competitive bidding for a gross price, a bid, which
did not furnish the detailed information required and which thereby
substantially affected the amount of the bid and gave advantage to
such bidder, not allowed to others, varied substantially from the
specifications, and the city could not accept such bid.
In the case of Le Cesse Bros. Contracting. Inc. v. The Town
Board of the Town of Williamson, 672 A.D. 2d 28, 403 N.Y.S. 2d 950
(1978) , the New York Supreme Court Appellate Divison held that (1)
the failure of the low bidder to meet the requirement of the bid
specifications that the bid set forth the names of the
manufacturers whose equipment would be used, rewired rejection of
the bid, and (2) that said requirement was not illegal. Also, the
New York court held that a municipality may decline bids which fail
to comply with the literal requirements of the bid specifications,
and where the variance between the bid and the specification is
material and substantial, the municipality must reject the bid so
Board of Directors, County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County, California
June 14, 1989
Page 3
that all bidders may be treated alike and the possibility of fraud,
corruption or favoritism is avoided.
Further, it is our opinion that the bid documents, prepared
and published by the District, violated Public Contract Code
Section 3400. First, the specifications unfairly favored Schwing
America over our client by permitting Schwing to bid a hybrid pump
unit, never before built, that combined ram cylinders with a
smaller than usual valve assembly, all of which adds up to a
substantial and nontrivial cost advantage. In effect, as to
Schwing, Section 62- C of the specifications describes a hybrid
Chevrolet, whereas as to our client, the specifications describe
a Cadillac. Thus, the specifications did not list "at least two
brands or trade names of comparable quality or utility" as required
by Section 3400 of the Public Contract Code. Second, Section
62-C of the specifications provides "Alternative manufacturers are
not acceptable." This provision is in direct violation of Section
3400 of the Pubic Contract Code, which requires all public agencies
(including Districts) , to permit equal products and to insert in
their specifications "at least two brand or trade names . . .
followed by the words 'or equal' so that bidders may furnish any
equal material, product, thing or service."
See Argo Construction Co. v. Los Angeles County, 271 C.A.2d 54; 76
Cal. Rptr. 361 (1969) .
Accordingly, the bid of Advanco must be rejected, and the
contract should be readvertized for rebid after the specifications
and bid documents are revised to comply with Public Contract Code
Section 3400.
Respectfully submitted,
MAGUIRE, TOGHIA & ORBACH
Attorneys for Putzmeister, Inc.
Everett W. Maguire
EWM:kks
331M1.03
cc: Putzmeister, Inc.
Orange County Board of Supervisors
Orange County District Attorney's Office
orange County County Counsel
TELEPHONE:
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS (714)982-8803
DIV. OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
1500 WEST NINTH STREET,P.O. BOX 1210
UPLAND,CALIFORNIA 91786
May 23, 1989
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
E Attention: Mr. Tom Dawes
Director of Engineering
N
C Reference: Sludge Handling Facilities. No. P1-34-2
I Sid Proposal of May 23 , 1989
N
Gentlemen:
E
E In regard to the referenced project bid this date, we
R respectively submit that we omitted naming one equipment
g manufacturer on Sheet 9 of the Bid Proposal. The subject
equipment is the "Cake Transfer and Loading Pumps ' manufac-
tured by Schwing American. one of only two designated and
a acceptable pumps.
C Jomnetitive pricing on both equipment options were received
0 oniv moments before bid closing. Their cut is reflected in
our bid price, however, with less than one minute to go
N before closing it was impossible for us to list Schwing
S American. Our Mechanical Estimator, Mr. Norm Olsson.
T immediatei-y called Schwing' s representative, Mr. Kevin Cohi11
R of Chemwest t714/855-3800 ) , at 11 : 01 AM prior to bid opening
to notify him of our intent to name and use the Schwing
0 Pumps.
C
T 1 regret this omission occurred. but ,fudge your review of
0 this matter to rind our intent to be sincere and without
decention or any kind. Please call me shouid you have any
R aue5tion5 .
S
Very truly yours,
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS
DIV. OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS. INC.
� . i
Ronald,J. LangioisU
Executive Vice President
RJL: dh
-75238901 . RJL
Cheri w est wc
Engmeere4 Equipment 23274 Del Lego Drive-Laguna Hills.California 92653.714/855-3800.800/342-1811
May 24, 1989
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Attention: Mr. Tom Dawes
Director of Engineering
Reference: Sludge Handling Facilities, No. PI-34-2
Bid Proposal of May 23, 1989
Dear Mr. Dawes:
This is to advise you that Mr. Norm Olisson of Advanco Constructors called
our Mr. Kevin Cahill at 11:01 a.m. on bid day, May 23rd, to advise him of his
intent to utilize Schwing America's "cake transfer and loading pumps" as
specified In Section 62-C of the specifications should Advanco be the successful
bidder. Mr. Olsson explained that he had been unable to write our name in
on the bid form due to the time our price was called in ro him.
Please call if you require additional verification of this.
Chemwest, Inc. representing Schwing America
.Gerald F. Ehle
GFE:cmm
cc: Schwing America-Mr. Harry Crow
Schwing America-Mr. Ed Oakley
OARRELL R MCCRORV• MONTELEONE & MCCRORY STEPHEN MONTELEONE
'ANTON R BELLAND' LAWYERS IIS86.19621
POSEPT HALE' IP OF PRO ESSIONAL COPPER-...
�T RICK J. OUFFY LE' P PNmNCPSN ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE
MICHAEL F. MINCHELLP' 10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA. SUITE 2500 SUITE 200
THOMAS R NCGUIRV LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM J. INGALSSC I)I SOUTH ANITA DRIVE
PXILIP C. PUTNAM* TELEPHONE ISI81 509-6100 - (213) 937-1533 ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92668
JOSEPH A. MILLER' TELECOPIEP I8181 509-6140
DIANA M. ORO" TELEPHONE
DONALD J. SHIELDS TELEX 6N565 17141 978-0750
DOUGLAS VOKOMIEO
JACK W. ELLIOTT MAILING ADDRESS TELECOPIEP
ARTURO SANTANA. JR. R O. 60X 7608 I]NI 93h4183
SCOTT D. FISHER
ROBYN L. FISCMDR UNIVERSAL CITY, CALIFORNIA 91608J806
THOMAS J. INOS
CLARK X. CAMERON OUR FILE NUMBER
PAVL JOXNSEN 1359
SPENT R. REINKE June 21 1989
RICHARD F. SCOTTI I
♦PROFESSIONAL CONP.N .N WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
Board of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re : County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, California
Project: Sludge Handling Facilities
at Reclamation Plant No. 1
Job No. P1-34-2 , Bid Date : May 23 , 1989
Dear Members of the Board:
We represent Advanco Constructors, Inc. which has
asked us to reply to the "Letter of Protest" sent to you by
Maguire , Toghia & Orbach on behalf of Putzmeister, Inc .
That letter complains of two asserted irregularities :
(1) failure to comply with Section 4101 of the Public Con-
tract Code, and (2) failure to comply with Section 3400
of the Public Contract Code. We shall reply to each in
order.
Section 4100 at seq. of the Public Contract Code
applies only to the listing of subcontractors and has nothing
to do with manufacturers . The require fisting of manu-
facturers is done by the engineer for his own purpose of
verifying that the bidder will supply proper materials .
Advanco' s "failure" to list has already been explained by
our client to the District promptly after bid as caused by
the late cuts and last minute adjustments to its bid and
that Schwing America, Inc. was notified its price was being
LAW OFFICES
MONTELEONE & MCCRORY
Board of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
June 21 , 1989
Page 2
used by Advanco prior to bid time. Correction of this
immaterial oversight after bid is entirely proper and
within the discretion of the Board. The citation to
Section 4101 of the Public Contract Code and to out of
state cases deciding different issues- under different
state laws is entirely irrelevant to this proceeding.
The patent attempt to twist Section 4100 at seq. to a
situation to which it clearly does not apply is a bold
attempt to confuse the Board and give Putzmeister a
second bite at the apple on a rebid.
The allegation that Section 3400 of the Public
Works Code was violated is similarly without merit. We
assume, and no one has alleged to the contrary, that only
two manufacturers for the required equipment were known to
the Engineer and only two were listed. Section 7-1 of the
General Provisions of the specifications then provide that
after award of the contract an or equal submittal may be
made within thirty-five days if a desired or equal product
exists . These requirements of the specifications are in
strict and explicit compliance with the last two sentences
of paragraph (a) of Section 3400 of the Public Contracts
Code. Thus there is complete compliance .
The protest of Putzmeister should be summarily
disallowed and the project awarded to our client as the
lowest responsible bidder without further delay . The delay
so far caused by this untimely protest has been against the
public interest and any rebid of the project would obviously
result in a substantial increase in bid prices to no purpose
whatever.
If your counsel has any questions , they are free
to call upon me at their convenience .
Very truly yours ,
MONTELEONE & McCRORY
By
PJD:mkg PAT$ZCK F
cc : Armand DeWeese
/ Advanco Constructors
Attm Mr. Tom Dawes
JOHN CAROLLO
`. j ENGINEERS
M FMOENIX, CAAV U CRE X U FOIIM vNN Al1EY.fA • VISALIACA
Ya10ERNAROINO.CA NCSON.AS
SAMOIEGO.CA 6 EREFIEMCA
EACRAMENTO.CA • LOS ANGEUS.G
FRESNO,CA
June 28, 1989
F3120A.10
Mr. J.Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Subject: P1-34-2 Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation
Plant No. 1 - Protest by Putzmetster, Inc.
We have reviewed the letters of June 14 and June 22, 1989 from the representative of
Putzmeister, Inc. and wish to clarify several issues with regard to our specifications for the
Cake Loading and Transfer Pumps.
Design of the sludge cake pumping systems was developed over a period of approximately
twelve months, beginning In April 1988. We evaluated several options for transporting sludge
cake and recommended that the Districts proceed with a design using cake pumps. This
recommendation was made after an extensive evaluation of cake pumping technology. This
evaluation included over forty telephone contacts to facilities in North America and Europe and
site visits to mine than one dozen installations.
Sludge cake pumping is a unique application of a product which was originally designed for
concrete pumping. The Districts was one of the first to employ this technology for large
volumes of sludge when the Put=eister pumps were installed at the solids storage facility at
Plant No. 2. At the time of our evaluations, we contacted the following manufacturers of cake
pumping equipment: -
Putzmeister, Inc.
Schwing America
Geho Pumps, Inc.
Abel Pump Corp.
Teka Pumps Inc. (Ardor)
10840 Warner Avenue,rwte 100 - Fouma n Valley.California 92708 (714)963-9851 FAX-.1714)962-3077
Mr.J.Wayne Sylvester. General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
of 28 1989
County
June
Page 2
Each of these manufacturers was requested to supply information on their ability to
provide equipment meeting the anticipated design criteria. One of the key criteria was
that the manufacturer demonstrate experience with equipment of equivalent capacity,
pumping sludge for distances equal to or greater than those anticipated for this project.
Only those manufacturers with installations operating in North America, with the ability
to provide parts and service in the United States were considered.
Because of the size of the proposed facility and its importance to the Districts' operation,
we feel it is essential to have equipment with proven capability. Only Putzmeister and
Schwing have operating installations in North America using cake pumps of the size and
capacity needed for this project. Each of these manufacturers also have service
organizations in California.
Geho Pumps, Inc. reported only one small mobile unit in operation in North America and
did not indicate service capability in the U.S. Abel Pump Corp. listed two installations.
one in Wisconsin and one in Pennsylvania. These installations are much smaller than
P1-34-2. Teka Pump, Inc. did not list any installations in North America, although they
do have some European installations.
The draft specification which Putzmeister references in then June 22 letter references
pumps of much smaller capacity than those specified for this project and does not
appear to have any bearing on the issues of this protest.
With regard to Putzmeister's contention that we did not specify equal models,please note
that we worked extensively with each of the manufacturers to develop a competitive
specification and both manufacturers received draft copies at various times throughout
the design period. The capacities of the specified pumps are within ten percent, a
negligible difference in evaluating equipment of this type.
It is our understanding that the final quotes to the Contractor for this equipment were
within five percent on approximately$2 million worth of equipment. We believe this is
an excellent indication of the competitiveness of the specification for this equipment.
We made every effort to develop a detailed, competitive specification for this unique
product and we believe the Districts will obtain good quality equipment if the project is
awarded. We are available to discuss this issue In more detail as required. If you have
any questions,please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours.
JOFIIJ
G.William Knopf V
GWKjr
"- RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
10O N SPV E
June 20, 1989 VU'WX8127
f TMNVALLEY,f FM $nMl27
A1<19622G11
Joint Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 8 14
of Orange County, California
Subject: Summary Financial Report for Nine Months Ended March 31, 1989
Transmitted herewith is the Sumnary Financial Report for nine months ended
March 31, 1989. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint
operations and the individual Districts through nine months of the 1988-89
fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The
combined 1988-89 budget for all Districts is $365.9 million, of which
approximately 74% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and
additions, including reserves for said capital projects. The total budgeted
revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are set forth below.
TABLE I
COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
INCREASE 1988-89
REQUIREMENTS 1988-89• 1987-88- (DECREASE) % OF BUDGET
JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0, M'a R $ 38.9 S 34.0 S 4.9 10.6%
COLLECTION SYSTEM 8 OTHER DISTRICT 0, M 8 R 5.5 4.9 0.6 1.5
TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 95.0 57.7 37.3 26.0
DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 50.6. 73.0 (22.4) 13.8
DEBT SERVICE 12.6 11.5 (1.1) 3.5
SUB-TOTAL $202.6 $181.1 $ 21.5 55.4%
CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $124.5 $174.9 $(50.4) 34.0
SUB-TOTAL 38.8 47.8 9.0 10.6
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $163.3 $222.7 $ 59.4 44.6%
$365.9 $403.8 $(37.9) 100.0%
FUNDING
CARRY-OVER $ 32.0 $ 29.6 $ 2.4 8.7%
APPROPRIATED RESERVES 248.0 292.1 (44.1) 67.8
SUB-TOTAL $280.0 $321.7 $(41.7) 76.5E
TAX ALLOCATION (1% SHARE) $ 28.1 $ 27.1 $ 1.0 7.7%
TAX LEVY FOR BOND REDEMPTION 0.6 1.2 (0.6) 0.2
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS 2.7 7.3 (4.6) 0.7
FEES 29.5 17.2 12.3 8.1
INTEREST $ OTHER 25.0 29.3 (4.3) 6.8
SUB-TOTAL $ 85.9 $ 82.1 $ 3.8 23.5E
V.►� TOTAL FUNDING $365.9 $403.8 $(37.9) 100.0%
* ADJUSTED FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS
Q
Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and
expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects
and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves
and inter-fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said
statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations.
Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The
statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash
transactions for fiscal 1988-89 which were accrued in 1987-88 are not reflected
In the year-to-date balances.
CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Earned interest generated by our continuing program of investing reserve funds
(primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage
facilities) is $17.0 million through the third quarter of the year. Virtually
100% of our funds are invested in short-term government securities or time
deposits. We currently have our funds invested with the County Treasurer's
commingled investment program to take advantage of the higher yields available.
JOINT OPERATING FUND
This fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative activities
relative to the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. The
JO expenditures along with the self-funded insurance program costs are monitored
by the Fiscal Policy Committee and if the staff experiences some unexpected
expenditures, they are reviewed by the Committee.
Salariessnd Wa 2ss - Even though we have had to add employees, there are several
authorized but unfilled positions and, thus, some payroll savings have been
realized to date.
Employees' Benefits - Includes Retirement, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment
Insurance, Group Medical Insurance and Uniforms. Unemployment insurance and
other benefit accounts will continue to recognize savings because of unfilled
positions mentioned above under Salaries and Wages.
Chargebacks to Districts and CORF - Payroll expenses are charged back to CORF
through the cost accounting system for work on the treatment plants' capital
expansion program, and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection
facilities capital expansion projects as well as maintenance and repair of said
systems. Also reflects industrial waste division charges to respective
Districts.
Gasoline, Oil 8 Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool . A large portion is
recovered through our equipment billing system and included in revenue below.
Insurance - Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy,
employee fidelity, boiler, fire, earthquake and all risk insurance policies, and
pro-rats cost of the self-funded liability insurance program. Expense is in
line with annual budget.
-2-
Memberships - Includes the cost of membership in CASA, AMSA, SARFPA and other
organizations. Annual membership costs are recorded when paid.
Office Expense - This account includes various types of office supplies,
stationery and related items.
Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for influent and sludge odor
control at trea en p ants es. The main chemicals used to control odors are
chlorine, ferrous chloride and hydrogen peroxide. Ferric chloride is used as a
supplemental odor control chemical , and caustic soda is also used in air
scrubbers throughout the plants to reduce hydrogen sulfide emissions.
Expenditures peak above the budgeted $8,000 per day during the summer months and
are lower through the fall and winter.
Chemical Coa ula�nts - Expenditures for this item are required to dewater our
s udges—� prior to disposal to comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board
requirements.
Other 0 eratin Su lies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners,
anitorial supplies, tools, lab chemicals, etc. purchased throughout the year.
Contractual Services - The major elements in this line item are for payment
of gate fees at the coyote Canyon landfill , payment for various offsite sludge
reuses and trucking, and payment for grit and waste-activated sludge removal and
disposal at the BKK landfill.
Professional Services - Primarily consists of General Counsel 's fees, audit
fees, and miscellaneous consulting services.
Printing and Publications - Includes all reproduction activities in-house and
with outside services.
Rents and Leases - Equipment
Outside E ui ment Rental - Primarily for the rental of large cranes and
equipment necessary or removing and replacing major pumps, engines and
other large equipment during the course of maintenance and repair
operations.
CSOOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for District-owned equipment
used for overhead type activities. There is an offsetting credit applied
through the cost allocation system for these charges.
Repairs and Maintenance - This item includes parts and supplies for repair of
plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on
this item. Generally this account runs close to budget each year due to the
unpredictability of major equipment failures.
Research and Monitoring - Budget includes funds for the ocean monitoring
contract required by our NPDES permit. Other projects include operational
research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters,
and also include the Districts' annual share of participation in the Southern
California Coastal Water Research Project.
-3-
Tral , etings 8 Training - Major items are authorized by specific Board
acvetions.Me Expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required additional
staff and Board travel. 1..�
Utilities - The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased
electrical power. Testing of new electric motors at the new Outfall Booster
Station will increase expenses in the last quarter. Total expenses are expected
to be within the budget limits.
Other Expenses - For items not chargeable elsewhere such as freight, safety
supplies, etc.
Prior Year's Expense - This account is required by the Uniform Accounting System
and represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from
the previous year or payment of charges which could not be accrued at year end.
Generally, all expenses to this account are recorded in the first quarter. In
addition to routine unaccrued invoices, this account contains a $167,000
adjustment for plant power expenses. This was the result of an unusual use of
electrical motors at last year-end which caused the accrual to be understated.
Allocation to Districts and CORF - This is an account established in connection
with the cost accounting system and represents materials, supplies, and services
overhead chargebacks to the individual Districts and CORP.
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts'
jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of
56.9% (including reserves) of each District's budget requirements for 1988-89.
During the last nine months, $52.0 million was expended on joint works treatment
and disposal facilities improvement and expansion projects. The pro-rata share
of joint works improvement and expansion costs is reflected in the financial
statements of the respective Districts.
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS - The statements reflect the accounting transactions for
The nine Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint
Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts:
Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation of the
Districts' pro rate share of the maximum 1% basic property tax allowed under
Proposition 13. The Districts average approximately 2.9% ($.029 for each
$1.00) of the basic levy.
Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make voter-
approved outstanding general obligation band principal and interest
payments. In accordance with the Jarvis-Gann initiative, tax levies to
satisfy these obligations are not restricted. The 1988-89 levy was waived
for Districts 2, and 7, and debt service is being financed by interest and
reserve funds.
Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB have historically funded
up to 87K of treatment plant construction for approved projects. Budgeted
amount is outstanding balance on projects pending final EPA and SWRC8 review.
-4-
Fees - All Districts now have an adopted sewer connection fee schedule. This
`..: account also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by seven of the nine
Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue
Program, and the user fees implemented in Districts Kos. 1, 5, 6, 11 and 13.
Annexation fee revenue is indeterminable and, thus, is not included in the
budgets unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of fees.
Sale of Capacity Rights - This account records income from sale of capacity
rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the capital replacement
charge billed annually.
Joint Works E uit Sale - Revenue from the annual joint facilities inter-
it;district equ adjustment required by the recalculation of the respective
ownership percentages. Cost of this adjustment for purchasing Districts is
Included in each District's Share of Joint Works Construction.
Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents each District's share of joint
reatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay
Revolving Fund (CORF).
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense - Payment of principal and interest on
outstanding general obligation bonds and certificates of participation of the
respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $12.0
million.
Share of Joint Operating - Represents each District's share of operating and
maintaining the jointly-awned treatment and disposal facilities, and
administrative activities. Costs are distributed based 'upon each District's
respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details).
District Operating and Other Expenditures - Consists primarily of individual
District's general operating expenses, industrial monitoring, operations,
maintenance and repair of the respective District's collection systems.
i
-5-
t '
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of MMAE COUNTY
SIIMRI JOINT OPRAIIX6/YORCINB CAPITAL TIED WHIREI KNEW
9 MONINS ENDED MUST
T
�►� APPROVED
MET TEM-10-MTE UNEIPRDR TER-IMATE
1901-69 EIPENOIIMU MET RIttMDEO
SAME", NAES 1 Elfifin
Stlmiss 1 Now -- 16,n1,M0 Ig46,IT 5,621,621 65.421
hm911 BrosTlts 4,R7,000 2.411,21/ 1,1E,720 33.101
TOTAL PAYMLL 20,765,000 13,MI.40 7,471,Ml 4.9E
bm Msr9mats to 015751 CCU (5,010,000) 13,3n,M11 11,TA,61/1 4.461
ACT JOINT O Tll1 PAYAM 15,635,000 9,91.D11 5,723,924 63.511
MATAIMS. SMPLIES 6 SMICE9 -- -_-- -- -•-_
6...Itns. 011 S 04.1 n3,00D 132.035 112,165 57.671
Insarron 646,04 411,390 221,610 0.771
Rro6msMM n,RD IA,NO 10,020 59.921
MIT.himn 165,M0 19.m 56,023 66.051
CMarlm A U.Crotrnl 2,n0,W0 1,saja 1,024,557 65.261
CMtlral CYl"Ints 2,239.000 1,93,M0 735,160 67.171
OtW Opstatln0$Applies AT ANTA 330,819 T0,111 53.271
Crotract.al 9.Y1us 5,0A6,000 S,667,M9 I,n8,551 72.601
Pralntlmst SerNitm 505,000 313.377 169,623 66.411
Prlalln9 A Po611u1196 T3,0M 134.023 70,775 65.1E
fOVXpsonl Ronpl 190,700 142.741 41,259 75.131
Rmtlp A Xtlntrosen 31 ELMO 2,411.171 605,III 70.331
Ross...N 1 Rrolt9r1n9 2,201,000 1'631,417 573,988 MITI
bsr.1, RAW, A IntsIn9 19,OR M,IN AO,nA 59.151
Vnaoll.ctkls krronts 1A9 ID 1.741 12.131
Utilities 6.09AR 3170499 2,346,031 61.261
Mon Up.... 230,100 211.20 11,6E 94.921
Prior Ym,s E.pmm E,m 21/a01 (167.031 435.071
A.4mstln9 ENpmn AO,OM M,nl 17,Sn MITI
TOIL MATERIALS 1 3RVIM5 24,702,M0 17.114,m I,m,m '--69.121
I ... ALURNATI N t0 ENDS A MU 1300AM1 (237,3731 161,m1 79.12%
MET JOINT MR MATERIALS A SERVICES 74,02,DOD 16,I37,3M 7.6p,M1 6:.001
............
TOIL JOINT MATINS EIPMES 40,09i'm 26.791.635 13,MIA9 66.051
REVENUES
Raen9u 11a05.0001 11,215.2471 10.247 1".951
Lnn Alloutlon to DISTS A CCU 5,00 1.501 IAT 30.021
NET JOINT OPERATIMS REVENES 11,200,0001 1I.211,7461 13.146 101.15%
NET JOINT MATINS EUMES 38,97,00D 13,94.99 17,92,III 4.7111
-------__
6ALLM96E MIA
..............................,.R.L FEW ...._. [XIAIF9____.._.._......
DiimM MET 10 R1E MET 11 ME
1 10.147 7,IM 4,223.030 2.717,713
7 27.346 22,333 11.451.000 71T0139
3 T,An 23,M 12,24,000 1,M6,39
5 3,033 San 2,104,000 I,m VIS
6 Am 1,93 2109.01NO I,177.14/
7 6.607 4,%1 71149.M 1.771,1R
�✓ 11 7,117 A.m 3.21011000 I1731.4%
4 In 120 HIM 41.364
14 I.m 177 731.00 311,07
93.05 li'm 11,117.00, n,96JM
COUNTY SMIIATION DISTRICT MD. I
SUMMARY WAVERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
9 MONTNE ENDED 31311(19
BUOBE7 REVIEN -
1918-09 Aminin0 Year-Ta-Dole
Budget You-to-Bate Budlet 1 Entitled
Beginning Fund Wagon, duly 1 -- 23,131,940
REYEMES,
Iar Levy land Fuodls) only) 56,000 35,679 20,321 63.711
Tas Alln.t onsl9uhvention (Share of Ill 1,809,000 979,169 019,831 54.131
Federal and State Construction Srants 285,000 7,151 277,842 2.511
Co., it,, Fea Gilliam 541,234 (41,2541 109.251
Other Feee 2,0,000 2,008,423 679,575 74.721
Sale of hpa[ity Rights 492,000 0 492,000 0.001
Interval, 4 Ak,c. Receipts 1,340,000 I,B31,292 1491,2921 136.661
Other 124,000 0 124,000 0.001
-"-- """""" ----. ---------_-
total Moving 7,294,000 5,402,977 1,191,023 74.071
swww —
Total Ramos 4 Beginning Balance, •w•'www• 7E,531,917 �a�Y^••^•
EWMDITMESt
-. Shone of Joint York, Trot. Plant 6 Reserver 17,694,000 5,426,460 12.267,340 30.67%
Dialrlot Fronk Smr Co err 4 Sisarvn 3,19 000 0 3,150,000 0.001
End Raliceaont and Interest inaese 2,391,625 1,201,075 I,110,550 50.431
Share of loin! look, Operating Gone. 4,223,000 2,717,713 1,305,211 64.361
Provided for Reieburneent agreements 0 0 0 0.001
District Operating 4 Other Songsters, 123,000 204,457 118,343 63.30E
Total Inondituros 27,771,625 9,349,703 I0,221,920 34.391
EAdinq Fund Baluce, ewwwwwe 18,90,211
FACILITIES EIPAINION
Silence Adlntents Truster To Balms
711111 1 Additions FISH Assets 3/31109
CONSTRUCTION IN PAORAESS, --_ -_—_— ---�- -^�_
_--------___----__--
Share of Joint larks 8,177,246 5,426,460 11,615,60) 12.617,163
Su0-Total 1,177,246 S,4L,/60 II,h15,BQ1 12,IBi,B63
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT 0 EBUIPI
--- -----Land and Prowls Rights 811390 81.391
Collection Linn at Puss Side. 5,779,133 5,779,133
beslsept Facilities 0 0
Disposal Facilities 11,593 11,513
General Plan And Adaln, F.W. 35,251 35.256
Enkty in Joint Trntant Fnil. 8,132.579 1402,9311 1,615.00 27.345,491
Other Am is at Coot Laos Agent. 70,233 117,1641 53,065
Total ProoertY Plant 1 Equip• 10,901.43E 0,0Si,361 _� 0 45,993,799 I
{
cmry SOITATIOH DISTRICT 0. 2
S T HUrMV PIAAMCIAL REPaT
9"Dim EARED USI109
BURET SEVEN
y. inF89 hision9 Ior9eAse
bdq.t_ 9.-To-Date Budg.t- I good"
Beginning Fund Balsiaes, 1W9 1 10,147,036
REVEMS, ••_---
res Live Read Padls Will 0 0 0 O.00t
I. All onllmrlSWnntlmc (not of Ill 7,433,000 4,772,770 2,160,222 64.211
Indent and Sbta Costeatim&sets 7e0,0a 19,663 770,331 2.491
hnnacti. To. 80.000 110/1.307 1191,3071 122.511
Other Ines 3,Nc,000 2130.120 1,221,OND 65.871
Sale 01 Coast,Right. I,0O,0O 0 1,3O,0W 0.001
Internet A Ala. Receipt. 5,411,924 S,OE,O9 ms'a 1 101.141
Oher 307,000 0 101,OW 0.001
Taltl A.en. 19,015,924 13,777,237 6,031,667 69.531
...wee. .....vew ............
Intel Aivmue k Batmiq Aalon, 151,324,213
EIPEHDIIIRES, -_-_-
Shar.al 2nlol Bork. lral. Plot S Henan O.3O,Oa 14,101,172 IA,]96,OA 21.531
District Iran Saner Cantr 1 Aneerres 2213121000 4,291,901 17,173,09 21.901
Rand btlrtaet and Internet Expense 4,399,006 2,422,600 2,176,406 32.661
Shart of Joint Bart. Ope.ting Bounce 11,161,0a 1,90,20 3,469,O2 19.741
Presided Ter Reonuotemt Agnnemt. 0 0 0 0.001
District Operating 1 Othe bo.nel.a 149,000 50.613 213,317 66621
total foenditAra 102,392,401 0,792.631 71,7N,372 -----30.011
Ending Pad blou. ..nn... --- .
123,331,09 ^•••ntlw s.........
FACIL111O fIPA0IO
Wence Adlaetsmle borer le bl.0
711111 A Mditles. Iiod Ault, 3131/0
CORIAO710A IN PRME, --_-_ •_-- -•-•_--• -•-^
--------------
2-29 Oraeacwad Oinensm 11 41
2-10-IA E.11d Relied Trunk 191.8O IIBI.m01 0
2.21 Well.bner Euclid-blot 11,813 11,815
Grim Canon PIS T.I." 51613 3.613
Plant Be. 3 -h.liWwy Stella and
Feasibility Rome 8,043 4,043
2-11-3 H. both Selling Hills Belied bee 1.319 34.411 35,06
2-10 Bohol. finish - SARI 162 34.0a O.00p
rncnes.Pushing hsinBe at bellow
0 orsim Structure A.173 36,773
Tent int.cal. 5.... ire.tell to Bbwll 213 213
Pullmtm/Tres int.rcat.2-25 91901338 131 19,916,2921 1,173
2-21-1, 2-26-2. 2-26-3 Euslid ht.rnetm Be.. 224,514 3,955dO 4.179.902
Ent Richfield Intercatm 2-22 31.318 50.2/2 W.50
2-27 Be. bond.Belle# Sew 22.10 104.311 127,716
When heron Or.Pun 5tatlm Radio 2d4 30,415 R0.415) 0
Sub-Tat.1 10,338,176 1,191.901 (10.191.071 5109.370
Ihoe 01 Joint Hers. 24,316,917 14,907,I72 14,1O,9261 34.0.163
Soh-Iet.1 I4,316,917 14,907,172 14.431,926) 34.1O.163
CRMIEO PWNAO, PLOT k EQUIP, .^____- u_YW -A-_-- --`•_
-..Ad ad Pro.ty Right. SOME $17.614
111rction Lines end No Bles 52,06.100 10,111,507 11212541601
/nan att facilities 0 0
.Aimsal Facilities 33.172 33.11E
Wirel Plant no A6atn Pacil 68.913 68,913
Unit, in Jsnt Trussing lost 71.70.10 11.101,1031 4,O1,926 75,121,732
Did" Assets at Cat tea Awl ab'519 10.3361 233,213
Tat.l Preesrty Plant 1 Into 159,411,O0 I8.635,134 _ 0 179.123,16E
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 0. 3
SUMMARY IMULY FINAKIL u T
9 NONTMB ENDED 3131/09
BUDGET SEVIER
HIM Avulsing You-Tur-Date
Budget Yur-to-Date Budget L Espended
Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 --- 171,161,341 --- -----
REVENUES,
Tax Levy (Bond fund N) onlyl /9/,000 338,810 135,190 68.391
In Allocatiwa/Sutwoutions (Share of 111 1,787,000 6,079,574 3,707,426 62.121
Federal and Stale Construction Hate 854,400 21,159 132,141 2.511
Connection Fm 900,000 1,219,130 1319,130) 133.461
Other Fees 1,200,090 1,750,977 1111,9351 113.253 .
Sale of Capacity Rights 1,461,000 0 1,/60,000 0.001
Interest 1 elet. Receipts 5,21/,000 5,312,926 01,9261 101.90I
Other 0 0 0 0.001
iota] Reranue 19,917,000 14,330,134 5,596,10 TIMIS
Total Revlon. A Beginning Balances .e.......... 140,493,207 .m..�..m. ...e.......
EIPENDITUAES:
Shue of Islet Works Trot. Plat A Reserm 51,231,000 16,26B,985 11,962,015 27.941
District Trend Suer Coneir E Reserve 23,161.000 1,767,240 21,313,760 7.02%
Bond Rellreaenl and Interest Ban"at 5,021,951 2,7311,966 2.229.885 54.471
She,. of Isiah Yorks Operating Esmen 12,263,000 1,286,335 3,971,645 67.161
Proyddgd for Reimmirsoant Agm.ents 0 0 0 0.001
District Operating L Other Expenditures 1,576,000 685,577 990,423 43.501
.........__ ......._... __------__
Total Expenditures 102,261,131 29,747,123 72,314,121 MASS
...®..m... ---------_- .......... .....w......
Ending Fund Btler... 118,741,010
FACILITIES EIPANBIBN '
----------------_.-..____----______..___________.________,...___.____________�______________._..._.______.
Balance Adlusteenb Irantler To Balance
711160 1 Additions Filed Assets 3131189
----.-.---- ----____
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS,
_
3-33R Rehab an Manholes ao Millar Holder
Trunk Senr 10,790 I1,081 21.271
3-II-IR Urgency Mmbole Inclement 11,309 214.215 (225,52/) 0
3-29R-1 Miller-Haider Vault Rehab 1,966,869 1,521,654 3,101,523
3-21.2 Lamon Intercepter Sewer 26,734 690 27,424
Orange-Weelera 50trunk Belief 3-25 29,295 1,154 30.119
Trunkldne Sulphide Control EMd,tion 20,571 /,195 23,966
Meebide PIS Upgrade 11,341 13,868 25.209
3-30 Eliminate Direct Connection to Knott 1196 63 2,079
Sub-Total 2,078,105 1,767,210 1223,52/1 3,620,621
Share al Joint Works 26,614,732 16,26B,90 11,8//,/361 39,039,291
._ --------- --------.... ------------ ...........
Sub-Total 26,614,732 16,269,995 I1,611,1361 39,039,291
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT 1 EBUIP:
___________________________
Lad and Property Right, 290,231 200,231
Collection Linn and Puu Slns 51,301.510 111,7301 125,324 55,515,312 `
7ratsat Facilities 9,922 9,922
Dismal1�✓I
Disal Facilities 21,419 20.119
600VII Plat and Admin Fall l61,235 161,235
Equity in Joint Tre teen) Feel] 78,349,234 (1,202.023) /,11/,136 81,IB1,617
Other A...to at Cost Less Aeort. 115'ste 130,0191 107.341
.----_.----- -.____.-__- ------------ .-.--_.__-
Total Properly Pilot A Basin 162,968,591 16,778,413 0 179,717,017
CWTV W17ATIM DISTRICT IT. 5
TORIM MARTE0.T FIIARCIDi REPORT
9 mug am MUST
�, ------ ----- MIEa MID --------------
�/ ----_— —_ 19B&M Ressinin9 -- rex-Ta-0aM
BW9st .u-tar-0at. 9al.k I Eai,$did
093nnin9 fuel Baltic,$,Toll I Ji'mrost
REVERUS:
I. Din 10.6 Fund(,) only) n'm 14,275 I'm Ma91
To Alinati ilSOnetloa (Shur of 111 2,231.00 11403,911 MI'M 62.931
fk.r,I tit Slit. Can,trutioe Brut, 144,M0 3,551 I0,09 2.471
Connxtion Pm 6,611,0M 6,379,001 1231,OM) 103.5111
War Fork 70,M0 571,96E 133,0M 91.211
sale of Cip.tlh Rafts 247,M0 0 247,µ0 0.001
Intu,.t 4lnu. RKe19t, 791,010 7S I 49,669 93J81
Other 1,61,1E 0 1,61,00E 0.01
Total Some, 14,441,00 9^042 4,816,9µ 66.641
.....m.....
Total Rnma 1 St9innin9 9altice. 37,297,673
EVFI I1 .
But of Joist Dort. Tat. Plat a Aamr.. 4,970,OM 2,M,4N 2,277,54I 56171
DiWicl Truk S.ex W.lr L R,$xn. 14,551,OM 7,1®,M 7,431,1102 49.491
Food Mtlrmet ad Wthrasl Dun'. µ.IN 26,110 631 97.67E
Shur of Joint look,(gxatlel Erspnce. 2.IM,M I,M,911 676,M 67.571
Sua/µ for bis on.tml Agr,$amb 0 0 0 D.Mc
District Cemt109 1 Diher bouditor. 6N,0M 33I.9µ 2M.MI 55.401
late E.Pwftar.. 22,3M,/N 11,709,171 10.5M,914 V.501
WT"Put M14u. .mmmn n'9'NI .u..® .....e.....
FACILITIES EIPARTIM ------
— -------------- 41uce _---AllKl.mb trKax is Sluoe
MID I µkftH. Final Mat. 3I31I19
MMI in Is PH=$
rrwklin.Mx 1 Wilson St./9 51 4 M 96
5-21 Cust force Rain Mpiusspol 11 6 1431199 6.412,831 e.]N.i30
Wt.,Lit.Fxee W.1-2k 11099,970 4,234 11.101,441 21750
mail Truk Ma,$ I MIT 7,033
Bilhr dust Rli Moral.5116 47.471 47.471
5-31 Rxl Portia.of C..t Now Fern Rats I 1 6 14,794 414.361 479,361
3-27 M16u Truk Sxr Liao PIS I 'A' St PIS 43.354 N,337 119.01
5.32 Bittx Pt S Sckr IT PIS PIS lspr 5 L 6 1,18E 14,711 15,011
541 Myside 0 Truk Saw Iur Ill 47.019 67.309
5.33 W lriall PIS law 241 33.447 51.609
5.15 So. Caa.t Truk i.nr 1B1 µ,Mk 9.270
3-36 Crystal Cue PIS IBI N,M 34.910
A 1 0 cult W Prxptiet 5 16 167 I67
Sv6-Tstst I,354,431 7,20.3" 11,101,4µ1 7,657.384
Shut N Joist Wk. 0.5M.611 1.492.439 Statists 6,295,321
Se6-TNII 4,N0.611 2,692,119 1MI,73fi d,E91,J21
MµLETa IMaan, "I I MIN -- �— -------
.--us1 W Prpxl7 Right, 61231 4.231
Cailxlim lie. sat Pam S6na 111.011013 MUM 11.143,477
Trutast Scilike. 71347 11111
Disposal 1Kmt6x Tan 7.115
Bmmal Plat a1 µ.in FKSI 24,Ml 24.131
` =tr to Joist Ire..,$t full 12,9µ12" lIM,1M M
1 101.M 13. .011
0taw Amos at C.t Lau Mat. 711111111 14,M) 3,115
4W Prpxl9 Flat S Wto 21.411 9,6921n9 1 31,714.1N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
SIAEMY OIIAATERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
9 AMTM ENDED 3/31181
_-_______________-______
_---_ BYO6Ei AEVIEY
In
I788-N Assume, yur-io-D.b
Su6nt Ym4.I.t. Budget 1 Caused
Bnlning Fond 0.1.nus, July 1 --_ -IB,9P,013 ---- ---
REVENllE9t --_
Its Levy 1Bad Fundhl rely) 0 200 1200) 0.001
I. Albutln./S.burtion Mars of Ill 1,150,000 703,173 406,127 64.681
federal ad Slab [...traction &at, 136,000 3,34E 132,654 2.461
C...tin Fen 250,000 191,639 1741,838) 396.742
oteyr Fan 1,573,N0 1,162,412 370,505 75.031
Sall of Caulty Mots 242,000 0 242,000 0.Oct
Interne E M¢. RKliptf 413,00 484,758 169,7501 116.B11
Other 545,000 0 541,n0 0.001
Total Racnve 4,274,000 31386,430 867,570 77.231
-••, ••Y•••Total Aennoe L Initial Shines •vv®a• 22,363,44) e••^^e•^•
EIPMOITMES, _—
Shur of Lint sort. I'll. Plat 4 Resenn 4171110" 2,536,306 2,174.494 53.941
District Truk &m Constr L Reserves 3,593,000 401,349 1,150,451 12.321
And Mti,..t ad Interest Eape..e 0 0 0 0.001
Share of Joint Was Operating Eumns 2,050,00 1,2".047 771,953 62.291
Provided for Aeuturnant Agreements 0 0 0 0.001
District Operating L Other Eanditurn 173,ON 126,552 46,441 73.151
Total Eapndi6ure. 10,327,RI 413111164 6,144,346 -- 41.431
Eadin fun/ Mla... w®• 17,900,I01 mOev •mow
FACILIIIEI EWMOIN
BUnce M3ntants Tranin To RAIwe
?/Ila L Mdilgns flow Mnls L317111'
CONTNCTION 11 M6ESSt
Troulin low 4 Corrector Stogy 5 1 6 153 1A
6.12 Funk" Relief 33,115 33.115
5-29 Coast Evil Main Raiment 5 4 6 11.10 $37,517 M.617
litter Point PIS Oman 516 I/.LN 17.142
3-26 Rmelue Lido force Asir l6.N3 116.4431 0
5-3) Nmelue Pulin. of Coast by Force bin 5 4 6 IN 27,713 21,m
5.37 litter PI 1 Axly Pt HE gar 5 6 6 71 1,350 51420
A 4 B Volt Na Protectin 5 1 6 6/ N
14-Id A 4 1 Sisger get., 14.1.2 Baker Street
Fvoa Mb, Districts 6, 7 L 14 7,N1 37.SM 43,55E
Sol-Total N,SAf 442,349 (16,643) 4M.461
Share of Jobl Vmb 4,10,517 2.SR,506 �1713,27F) 5,730,724
Se6-Total 4.141.517 2.5M,5M 1753,27" 5.930.724
CMEIETEO PAMfRIV, PLOT S ENIPi ---- -_—^
Lad rid Predator Rights _ 562 162
Csllutin Linn rid Pun Sleds 1,303,40 16,643 1.3N,249
Treatment Failltin 21653 2,653
Olgoaal Fuilitln 1,394 7,394
Banal Plat sad Alain fail 04,362 14.362
Equity is Just 1,nu oat Taut 12,215.243 (103.343) 75512" 12,712,199
Other Moats at Cost Len dart. 19,937 115,1511 24,584
Ideal Presence Plat 4 tool, 17,863,229 2,775,361 0 20,639,I90
06gIY WITA7OR DISIRIC7 W. 1
S SPARY IIIIEFERLY FINK] L A f
9 mm WED mill"
_—_________ 6D06E1 REYIEY
1900-69 Reakow" Yese-To-Oath
added l.a-la-0ae law 14pmdu
Beginning Fund Salutes, July 1 511031139 --
REVEINES,
In Lem IBmd Fund(%) Only) 0 0 0 D.O1
In A1lmatim/SUOrmtions (Me. of ICI 3,60,m 2,253,044 I,4m,m 61.091
Federal ad Stale Cms&ualcn &sets 171,000 4,SM 172,42 2.371
Cmvutim FW Sodom 01.07 21,093 93.783
Other Fee, 617,000 319,025 92,973 81.811
Sale Of Coolly Rights 291,000 0 792,0m 0.01
IAlerell S AIK. RKapts 2,224,000 I,221.I1141 14,184) 100.191
other 0 0 0 0.001
let.) Ruaue 7,493,00/ 3,411,70 2,009,273 73.01
Total Revlon S Intoning Atlases rut®�• 63,508,534 ,•,YUYv •�••�^�•
EJIERBIIUPFSf •--
Shore of Jowl Wks inl. Plat I Anum 21,506,000 3,sks,114 1110591886 16.021
Olarmt trunk Sour Cm,lr 6 R.mye. 7,661,000 111,17E 4.1I0,622 10.611
Bud Retirement ad Iv1ero't 4p.nu . 576,465 354,1414 221,305 61.581
May.Bf Joint Way Dcerating&Puns.' 2,70,000 1."I,6O 919,377 64.451
&aided for Raa6.nma4 A7ru.ats 0 26,64 126,@I 0,001
Oistrl't 0;eral,ng I other Fapaatoree L105,0O 771,221 3L.771 70.411
Total Emaditdre. M,803,49 7,10,30 ui"7,M 21.411
Ending Fwd Sulam ® 36,313,111 ® �®
FI1ILJ7115I MIN
-- Balate Mllethate IraYfor Ill beleade
FILM 4941itlas Plead&We U31IM
MROIRDCTIM Is mOMSSS —
1-9 Fu,am Sollrmt 321 SL
7-I2 We, 12 PIS Forte Min 114,095 114,197
1-II Badrment end Qu.lrutia of PIS 19 0,03 51,51
We St. Belief Seer 7-2C-4 1.M7 40 12,307) 0
7-14 Win Amor1 of.....0 Smer 643.O1 MI (643,972) 0
7-IM South Airevt Oin v im Semr 32,4E hisom 6O.M
City a 0ru9e Imtall.mts 21,473 0.413
9m Wea Trunk 7-8 1M.145 (17) 1161.7781 0
0aMle mi. Re&mm Cly Wat. 4,SE3 13.0511 4.44
Min Street PIS 7-7 I.IM.M m 1.01,212
14-1-1 A I B Msler Int.. 14-1-2 Wer Strut
Force Maio districts 6, 1 1 14 1I'm 0.741 N•34
Serer Beam fee Face Imlde becafSe Plus 10.01 10.40
Rrta.Irust stpha at A.D. he 5,112 5.11E
Sob-Total 1,03,913 811,171 wro'clM 2.O3,OM
Sher.e1 Joint Yorks S'W'mi 3,/46,114 11,026,1531 1,01.31E
S.W.k.l , S,N1.361 I'MA,14 11,9a,1531 9,031,32E
CUmLETED PROPERTY, KMI 1 MP. --
Loa fell Procures MW, 1761454 276.454
Colleltien Lim, 1.0 b StO 2E,233.M CV,SM) 849,O7 M'So'm
74eatuet PuilitiO 0 0
Ilmeml Frzlllties 10.11E 10,7Q
6wdful Iiat ad AMin Pull 15.734 15.114
Issues En Junk Trutaml Mall. 16,54.574 (25519B5) 1.026.133 171361114
Bhe Malls at Curl Les,Also. 11,111 I9,610I 1,474
IPW M1mKU Plat L Fast M•713•BM 3,911,260 ...__— 0
(Im SAJInMIOA msmltl Imo 11
9 ROMRLY 1 F AWX ROM
\lam,✓/
SuOHT REVIEW
Yeu-Io-Orte
Bo6prt 9w-7r49. nA"t I blood"
blinniog fund koces, July I --- 31,SSSI --- ---
REVFI O. —_--
In Loy, (end Fad(,) a1y1 45,000 E9,104 15,876 64.W
In Alluatiaa/Subnatluo (Nov.a 111 1,997,000 1,94,371 697,679 13A11
Felr.l +od Stag Contrutlpe Boost, 196,000 4.715 191,213 7.441
C.Mal✓M I.n 7M,00 0"'114 II1,8141 IS&=
War 1. 1,07,00 1,010,4® 616,518 am
Sal,M C1pui✓A19An 331,000 0 131,0n 0.001
totality B MISC. AralPn 370,000 50,0% 719962 96.151
other 0 0 0 0.001
Iota) Saloon 1,496,00 1,7n,lN I,J56,45 MHz
total RMMa,A snioong Balhanr .00wo. 41,580,143 ®eve. •M.wm
WEWOITOAES. ---
Star,.1 Joeot Warn Int. Plot 4 Rnryes 7,E16,000 3,618,M S.W.?" %.m
Oil✓ill Irak Sony Con.✓ A Aem,u. 7,B91,m S00,Ng I,fiI,%1 31.141
Bad R.tir.t nd In✓rnt Enann 66,919 65.316 I'M fi.611
%al..1 J.Int Arb Owatin9 Upon", 3,2n,000 1,751,496 1,417,104 54An
Prnkd,d Aar Roya6Yr...Ml 41mMn 0 0 0 0.01
01r✓iat %rrtt., 4 O✓r Enoyditurn Holm M,M R1,4% 41.6n
Total beM0llra 13,961,9M 6,574,n1 7,3A.M7 V.M
Fading Into Bot.an �••® n,0%,%3
____-.—_______—�____�.--__-_-..__�
FACILITIES ONEIOA
Balana, Adjnt.Mh Iraalr to Balm
71I1% 1 Adddtlur NM Mats 3131M
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: ---- -- —
%0 IN E.rp.o , 6...r.lor at S✓6rr Ply R M
11-10-0R Vtlr.R.plu...at at Stator b.PIS 10,818 %,%7 114.135
11-I6 @.a Alan, trunk Shaer A.bab n,531 W,MS tlr,e%I 0.4fi
CE%Aaarnnto For Cent T,.k
4 Bola Ceiu 3.ses I,57!
Slater Statlu Mter 1 Pun world, 31,M 5,711 36.%g
Sub-Total Milan m,4fi 111,6981 %7,IB1
Star..I J.tnt load, l,M ,I% 3,131,036 II,Op,3a1 I.W,W
Sai 5,131.178 3,63,036 u,0Ao.3m 9,0,1111
C0Al1EI[I PM9FMfi, "I a EMPi --- ---_-- —
Lad W haVorty Rlpt, I%.f% 14.9%
Collacteu Lt.,had IN,ft. 18,317,011) %,313,%1
✓,,host Fanlitln 0 0
Oi,mal Ful Olin 3,053 3.051
Saral Plat no Main Full 181164 L,1M
Laity In 4alnl Irntmt Fact] 1714711870 (39,3141 low'st3 II,1R,731
O%r Rona at Coal Lad.Short. 1,749 I5,9411 file% I,MI
fetal hmrq Plat i Fakp 4',9..,^... v4,573,4" .o® •%.731.469
MATT SAIVAIIOX 01STR1Ct To. 13
SUNIARY MRTEP.IT FINANCIAL REPOTS
9 NONTNS ENDED 3/31189
MID REYIEO----___—
1988-89 Aessinina year-T.-ble
Budget Year-T.-orte Budget I EapndW
Dennis, Fund birm, July 1 -- 6,815,439 --_-
REVENUES, --^A-
to Lary IBmd Imaltl only) 0 0 0 0.00E
is Allmatim,/9ebnetlon, IShr, of 111 0 0 0 0.00E
Federal end Stale Contraction Brace S,uW 69 2,931 1.301
Council., Fen 374,000 130,720 113,no 34.94
Other Fee, 135,OW 176,/60 111,780E 131.931
bb el Caatlty Right, 1,000 0 1,10 0.00E
Interest L NW. Receipt, 17E,000 137,753 38,747 Man
other 0 0 0 0.001
total Revenue 907,000 ---714,801 247,1" 73.461
Total Arena 1 bginndnq Balance, v�Yev 7,560 111 •®-m
EXMMI7WES1 --_-_---
-- Share of Joint Wks Trot. Flat L Reserved 3,561,000 $1,970 3,309,07E 1.18E
District Srm1 $mar Conslr 1 Reserve, 3,700.000 0 3,700,010 0.001
Bond btlrssal add Interest Upon, 0 0 0 O.00E
Store of Jn6 t Work,Oper.tln9 Ea n e 59,000 47,364 13,6u 73.041
PrrldW it Annulment NO....at, 0 0 0 0.01
O6ctrict br.taq L Other Eneediturn 59,000 18,/86 0,314 31.111
Total eanddtre. 7.379,000 --- [12,828 7,1N,170 •_-1.511
Eadinq Fund Balencn .,m......� 7,447,413 mesas •��®-,
_----_^---^••-----^--- FACILITIES EIPWIOX _---'--
salute Adiu,bent, Trainor r So blew.
Al/ll 1 Addition, Find beets 3131/0
CC97RUCTION IN MORESSt -_— —_—•• •+_-- A•-•-_
---Aare of Jotnl work, 93.031 11.971 4I3,4771 I21,533
6ub-Tota1 85.031 31,11E 113,177E 121,532
CAUTI LETEO PROPMTV, PLANT 0 EQUIP: -----_'— --•—_-
---lead and Properly Rights —__ 0 0
Collection Lien ad Pun Stan 0 0
Tnalenl Facilities 0 1
Disposal Facilities 0 0
Unocal Plat and Wain Fall 0 0
Equity In Joint Trntmat Fail 150,201 13.6"1 13,477 E61,119
Other Asset, At Crl Len Adert 106,4E1 170,3711 06,043
IDhl Property Plant 1 Equip 411,633 `27,741 0 10,391
CNDSO SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 10
2MM OUARTERLT FINANCIAL REPORT
9 MSSIS WED 3/31109
RIM RESIGN
---J�-_--�`_ IM-19 Rntining Year-To-Date
hipot Yev-lo-0atm eodget 1 Expanded
Beginning Fund Balauu, July 1 -- 17,113,148 —_—
RMMM
In Levy lend Fondle) only) 0 0 0 0.001
In Allocation/Ssnntiu, (five of 11) 0 0 0 0.001
Federal ad State Co utractieo Brant$ 160,000 3,983 156,017 2.491
]RIND Fns 6,713,000 3,511,894 3,196,106 52.401
Other Fees 0 600 1600) O.OD3
Sall of Capacity Rights 281,000 0 281,000 0.001
Internet I Nsc. AecetOU 87,000 260,262 1177,262) 303.751
OUer 475,000 0 /75,000 0.001
Total Ronne 7,731,000 3,787,739 3,930,261 09.001
Total Rumors, 1 Beginning Balance •��• 2e,9E0,087 .m..e®. •sue®�
EXPENDITURES:
Some of Joint arks Trot. Plant I Renrrn 5.770.000 3,019,198 2,750,102 52.341
District Trunk Sour Cnrtr I Reeeus 1,509,000 116,3I4 1,972,4N 7.331
Sod Retirement aced Interest Esp.,, 0 0 0 0.0011
Share of Joint Yorks Inviting Engenmel 731,000 312,047 4I0.153 02.6911
Provided ier Reielorsnnt Agreements 0 0 0 O.4U1
District Operating 1 Other Expenditures 215,000 72,007 102,993 13./91
Total Erpuditorn 8,305,000 3,520,U6 4,704.334 /2.391
Ending Food Infamies .ae� -17,310d21
_--__—`---- FACILITIES EXPANSION •----
_---------_—_---- Balance Adjustments iransier To Balance
7/1/88 1 Additlos Fired Aside 3/31189
CONSTRUCTION IN PR08AESS1 __-- •--- -_---- —_--
Van Norman Truk Sneer (151.936) 151,136 0
14-1-1 A L B Gisler let., I4-1-2 Sake Streit
Force Bain, Districts 6, 7 1 1/ 53,390 116,514 170,104
Main St. Pon Staff. 2,657,218 2,657,218
Oislrut IS Fnnatpu 147,321 1147.321) 0
5mh-Total 2,706,193 116,514 ----0,613 7,827,322
Share of Joint Yorks 4,940,307 3,019,999 1999,2310 7,060,947
Sub-Total 4,90,307 3,019,age 1699,2381 7,060,967
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT I EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights 0 0
Collection Limes and he, Stan /,901,673 1151,9361 4,752,737
Treatment Facilities 0 0
Soaal adee 0 0 1
Gural meeal Plat &and AOein fail 0 0 1`'►'/
Easily in Joint Treatment Fact( 14,612,061 1224,237) 599,238 15,297,062
other Asset. at Cut Us, Anrt. 0 154,018) 147,321 93,303
Total Property Plant I Euip 27,163,234 2,158,157 ---•- 0 30,021,391
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 16
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
N ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
June 28, 1989
10M0 EW81
oa.eo2 el27zv
F NTAIN VN ..GUfOPNIG 82) 8127
Ma18823H1
REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: June 28, 1989 - 5:00 p.m.
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT:
Ron Hoesterey, Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Bill Mahoney Bill Clarke, General Superintendent
James Neal Gary Streed, Chief Admin. Assistant
Wayne Silzel and Acting Director of Finance
Peer Swan
James Wahner
Absent:
Dan R. Griffin
Workers' Compensation Excess Loss Insurance for 1989-90
At the regular meeting on June 14, 1989, the Joint Boards of Directors authorized
and directed the Fiscal. Policy Committee to evaluate proposals obtained by the
Districts' insurance broker and to place Excess Workers' Compensation insurance
effective July 1, 1989.
Available Coverage
The Districts' current coverage and premium levels are presented below:
Amount of Self-Insured 1988-89
Coverage Retention (SIR) Premium
Statutory $250,000 $30,050
(unlimited
coverage)
The Districts' broker has obtained several 1989-90 coverage and premium options
which are summarized below for consideration by the Committee:
Estimated
Option Amount of Self-Insured 1989-90
Number Coverage Retention Premium
1 $10 million $250,000 $28,073
2 $10 million $275,000 - $29,084
3 $10 million $300,000 $23,768
4 $35 million $250,000 $38,380
5 Statutory (unlimited) $250,000 $32,113
6 Statutory (unlimited) $275,000 $32,920
' 7 Statutory (unlimited) $300,000 $27,808
All premium estimates are based upon total budgeted salaries and will be adjusted
at year-end when actual salaries are available.
Report of the Fiscal
Policy Committee
June 28, 1989
Page Two - �-
1989-90 Workers' Compensation Fund Budget
The 1989-90 Workers' Compensation Self-Insured Fund Budget which was approved
by the Joint Boards on June 14, 1989 includes an Excess Loss Policy at $40,000,
which will be more than adequate to cover the actual premium for any of the
above options.
Committee Recommendation
The purpose for placement of excess coverage is to provide outside financial
assistance in the event of a catastrophic claim or series of claims. Over the
past seven years, the Districts' total Workers' Compensation claims expenses
have ranged between $65,000 and $115,000 per year. Any claims in excess of the
$110,000 in estimated claims included in the 1989-90 budget can be paid from the
$699,000 in budgeted fund reserves. Claims in excess of $250,000 will be
covered by the excess policy. Our safety program has assisted in maintaining a
low level of claims for an organization of our size, complexity and scope of
operations.
The Committee recommends that selection of Option 5, offered by General
Reinsurance which includes a self-insured retention level of $250,000 for an
annual premium of $32,113.
The recommended policy is a continuation of the existing policy at a slight
decrease in the rate per $100 of payroll . The net increase in estimated total
premium over last year from $30,050 to $32,113 is a result of the 41 additional
positions authorized during the budget process and no anal salary adjustments.
r RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
B1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
June 28, 1989 10844 EWS AVENUE
GO.BOX e121
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALRO.NIA 92728-B129
\1� 01XI 962-2A11
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: June 1 - 5:30 p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHER PRESENT:
Present: Wes Bannister, Director
William Mahoney, Director
Dan E. Smith Joint/District 7 Chairman James Neal , Director
Ron Hoesterey Vice Joint Chairman Wayne Silzel , Director
Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Clark Ide, General Counsel 's Office
Richard Edgar Past Joint Chairman
Robert Hanson Chairman, District 1
Richard Polis Chairman, District 3 STAFF PRESENT:
John Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5
James Wahner Chairman, District 6 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 13 Blake Anderson, Director of Tech. Services
Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Bill Clarke, General Superintendent
ThomasM. Dawes, Director of Engineering
Absent: Gary Streed, Chief Admin. Assistant
and Acting Director of Finance
Buck Catlin Chairman, District 2 Rich von Langan, Source Control Manager
Tom Mays Chairman, District 11
Don Roth County Supervisor
Roger Stanton County Supervisor
1) 1989-90 Individual District Budget Recommendations.
Summary of Budget and Fiscal Projections
The Committee reviewed the staff's preliminary 1989-90 budget
recommendations for the individual Districts which incorporate each District' s
share of the Joint Works operating and capital budgets approved by the Boards on
June 14th. The budgets of the nine separate Districts total $315.7 million, a
decrease of 13.7% from the 1988-89 budget. The reduction is the result of the
continuing expenditure of capital reserves for master planned construction
projects.
Approximately 16% of the budgeted requirements is for operations,
maintenance and replacement (0, M 8 R) and 4% for debt retirement. Capital funds
(including reserves) for construction of master planned sewerage facilities for
both the individual Districts' collection systems and the joint treatment plants .
account for 67%, and authorized general and contingency reserves are 13% of the
total budget.
-1-
F h
Executive Committee Report
June 28, 1989
Funding of the budget is provided primarily by accumulated construction and
other reserves, accounting for 67% of the total . In addition, taxes contribute
10%, fees (connection fees and supplemental user fees) 16%, and interest and
miscellaneous income 7%.
Except for Districts 13 and 14, which receive no ad valorem taxes, the tax
appropriations received pursuant to Proposition 13 by the other Districts are
fully allocated to cover 0, M & R. Districts 1, 3, 5, 6 and 11 have previously
adopted user fee programs to provide necessary supplemental financing of
Districts' 0, M & R as the costs of wastewater treatment and disposal activities
required by federal , state and local regulatory authorities have exceeded the
ability of the ad valorem tax revenues to fund operations under Proposition 13
constraints. District No. 13 receives no appropriation from ad valorem taxes
and is totally financed by fees. District No. 14 is financed by the Irvine
Ranch Water District.
As the rising costs of treatment exceed the ability of the remaining
individual Districts' ad valorem tax appropriations to fund the 0, M & R costs,
these Districts will also need to consider implementation of a supplemental user
fee program to provide the necessary revenues for financing their operations.
Projections indicate that District 2 will need to establish supplemental user
fees beginning in 1990-91; but District No. 7, it appears, will not have to
consider supplemental user fees until 1991-92.
The Districts presently treat 266 MGD of which 141 MGD (66 MGD now in
service at Plant No. 1 and 75 MGD now in service at Plant No. 2) is secondary
treatment. The budget projections assume continuation of the Districts' 301(h)
Waiver NPDES Permit beyond its 1990 expiration date (Action Plan Scenario 2,
50% secondary treatment). Should the Directors desire or the EPA and the RWQCB
require full secondary treatment (Action Plan Scenario 3) the capital (and
0, M & R) costs would increase substantially. The preliminary estimate from the
Master Plan financial projections is that capital costs for the 10-year period
would rise another $154 million. EPA and SWRCB have previously funded up to
871h% of the cost of construction of advanced treatment facilities but Congress
has eliminated the construction grant program and replaced it with a revolving
loan program. Thus, virtually all future treatment plant improvements will be
a local responsibility.
The real long-term impact of federal and state requirements on District
fiscal planning will be on 0, M & R costs. While, as noted, EPA and SWRCB have
funded a portion of constructing facilities fora higher degree of treatment in
the past, the added ongoing operating costs have always been paid entirely by
the local community. The Joint Operating budget approved June 14th increased by
14.5% for 1989-90. Operating costs will continue to rise due to inflationary
influences, rising flows, increased costs of sludge disposal , and other
regulatory requirements imposed by such organizations as the EPA, RWQCB and
South Coast Air Quality Management District. Under full secondary treatment
estimated 0, M & R costs would increase another $15-20 million annually when
all facilities are on line.
-2-
Executive Committee Report
June 28, 1989
Capital financing for sewers and treatment and disposal facilities will be
provided by accumulated construction reserves and interest earnings thereon,
connection and capital replacement fees, sale of capacity rights, and borrowing.
User fees are also a potential source of funding a portion of capital needs for
rehabilitation and replacement, treatment improvements, and debt repayment, as
well as 0, M 8 R.
Staff also reviewed the 10-year fiscal projections and pointed out that
the Districts' needs over the next ten years total $2.5 billion. When
appropriate reserve requirements are added, a shortfall of over $650 million
will occur during the 10-year planning period. Thus, it is clear that the
Districts will have to utilize a combination of increased user and connection
fees and debt financing to maintain their fiscal integrity and to keep pace with
the rising costs of sewage treatment and disposal and increasingly stringent
public health and environmental protection standards.
Combining ACO and FR Funds into New Capital Facilities Fund
There is a change in the capital funds structure proposed for all Districts.
The 1989-90 budgetary capital funds include the Capital Facilities Fund and the
Construction/COP Repayment Fund. The Capital Facilities Fund is a new fund this
year resulting from the combining of the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund (ACO)
and the Facilities Revolving Fund (FRF).
Historically, the ACO fund has accounted for revenues from annexations,
capital replacement charges, capacity right sales, construction grants, and
property taxes collected before 1979. Monies in this fund have been used for
each District's share of Joint Works CORF improvements and many trunk sewer
Improvements. All connection fee revenue has been deposited into the FR funds.
Outlays from the FR fund have generally been limited to new trunk sewer lines to
serve new development. However, some FR funds have been transferred to the ACO
fund to cover construction financing short falls.
Staff is recommending the combination of the ACO and FR capital improvement
funds used in the past into one new fund to be called the Capital Facilities
Fund. This recommendation is reflected in the proposed budgets.
The Construction/COP repayment fund serves two purposes. This fund
accounts for the construction of those facilities authorized in the 1986 COP
issue for Districts 1, 2 and 3 and also for the repayment of the principal and
interest. This fund will continue to be used in the future as each District
issues debt instruments to borrow money to finance needed capital construction
projects.
Adoption of Gann Initiative (Proposition 4) Annual Appropriations Limit
The Gann initiative limits state and local government appropriations of
proceeds from tax sources to an amount based on changes in population and the
cost of living over the 1978-79 base year with allowances made for state and
-3-
Executive Committee Report
June 28, 1989
federally-mandated items. Each year the Boards must fix the limit in accordance
with the initiative. In 1989-90, "proceeds of taxes" are well within the
appropriations limits as set forth below.
1989-90 District Net 1989-90
District No. Tax Appropriations Budget Gann Limitations
1 $ -0- $ 2,192,000
2 601,000 8,153,000
3 2,729,000 10,763,000
5 1,203,000 2,077,000
6 -0- 1,287,000
7 1,669,000 3,050,000
11 348,000 2,209,000
13 Not Applicable Not Applicable
14 Not Applicable Not Applicable
Committee Recommendation:
The Committee recommends adoption of the proposed budgets for 1989-90,
approval of resolutions combining the ACO and the FR funds into a single Capital
Facilities Fund for each District, and adoption of the Gann limits. A detailed
transmittal is contained in the enclosed, bound report. If any Director needs
additional information, please call Wayne Sylvester or Gary Streed at
(714) 962-2411.
2) Source Control Program: Preview of Industrial Waste Ordinance Revisions.
The Districts' industrial waste ordinance regulates all industrial and
commercial discharges to the Districts' sewerage system. The current version of
the Ordinance was adopted in 1983. Staff and legal counsel have been working
for some time on an update of the Ordinance to incorporate items requested by
the Environmental Protection Agency and to clarify certain provisions and
simplify and streamline administrative and enforcement procedures. It was
originally anticipated that the revised Ordinance would be proposed last year.
However, because the EPA recently requested certain other changes in the
proposed Ordinance, and because of its relationship to certain Action Plan
elements, it was decided to consider the Ordinance concurrently with the Action
Plan presently under review by the Boards.
Staff has reviewed the proposed ordinance revisions on several occasions
with the Committee as they have evolved over the past few years, but the
Committee has focused its attention on the appeal procedures. In the past, an
appeal of a staff decision has been heard by the Board of the individual
District that issued the permit. However, because violations of permit
conditions generally have an impact on the Joint Districts facilities and/or
NPDES ocean discharge permit conditions, and thus on all of the Districts, the
Executive Committee had previously directed staff to revise the ordinance to
-4-
Executive Committee Report
June 28, 1989
provide for appeals of staff decisions to be heard by the Joint Boards or a
panel consisting of the Joint Chairman or Vice Joint Chairman and one Director
appointed by the Chairman of each District.
With respect to appeals of the staff's decisions, the 1983 ordinance
provides that any decision by the General Manager could be appealed to the
Boards. The revised ordinance proposed by staff and counsel provided that only
permit suspensions or revocations could be appealed to the Board, all other
decisions of the General Manager would be final , with any recourse to the courts.
The Committee discussed at considerable length the proposed new procedures
for appeals by a permittee to the Directors and directed staff and counsel to
revise the draft proposed ordinance to incorporate the following changes:
• An industrial waste permittee can appeal any final action
of the staff.
• All appeals will be considered and/or heard by the
Executive Committee.
• Any appeal of permit suspension or revocation will be heard
by the Executive Committee.
• Appeals of any other final staff decision will be considered
by the Executive Committee and the Committee, in its sole
discretion, shall decide whether to grant or deny the request
for a hearing.
• A member of the Executive Committee may designate another
member or alternate member of the Board of the same District
that the Executive Committee member represents to serve in
the member's place for purposes of such appeals.
Committee Recommendation
Enclosed is a brief summary and outline of the proposed revisions and the
tentative schedule for implementing the proposed ordinance. The report and
draft ordinance have been modified to reflect the above changes. The Committee
recommends that the modified proposed industrial waste ordinance be submitted
for consideration by the respective Boards.
3) Air Quality Compliance Issues.
A. Status Report and Recommendations re Pending SCAQMD Permit to Construct
for 60 MGD Primary Treatment Expansion at Reclamation Plant No. 1.
For the past several months the staff has worked closely with the Executive
Committee on measures necessary for obtaining a Permit to Construct (PTC) for
the next master-planned increment of treatment capacity at Plant No. 1, a
-5-
Executive Committee Report
June 28, 1989
$40 million 60 mgd primary expansion. At the May meeting, the staff provided
the Committee members with a status report and the Committee, pursuant to
previous Board authorizations, approved several actions necessary for obtaining
the permit from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD),
including completion of a health risk assessment, purchase of offsite air
emission credits, and issuance of the required public notice regarding the
proposed project.
The health risk assessment, performed by Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. , Consulting
Engineers, has been completed and submitted to SCAQMD. It demonstrates that the
proposed project falls within SCAQMD's criteria and has been accepted by SCAQMD.
The necessary offsite air emission credits have been acquired to satisfy the
permit conditions and, finally, the required public notice prepared by SCAQMD
was mailed on June 19 to all residents surrounding the Fountain Valley plant
(within one-quarter mile radius of the plant perimeter). At the close of the
public comnent period on July 24 (assuming no major obstacles are encountered)
staff will finalize the plans and specifications for the project and issue them
for bidding on the day the Permit to Construct is received.
Based upon the anticipated schedule, the PTC should be received in
mid-August and bids would be received for the project in September with award
of a contract scheduled for the regular October 11, 1989 Board meeting. The
anticipated project operational date would be for the winter of 1992-93.
Staff reported that one of the SCAQMD requirements for this job is a
separate volatile organic compounds (VOC) reduction demonstration project.
The demonstration project will include a small pilot wet scrubber (50 cfm)
using various chemicals to measure VOC reduction. Those chemicals and
operational modes most successful will then be modeled with a second, larger
scrubber (500 cfm). The purpose of the demonstration project is to determine
best available control technology (BACT). A proposal for the project has been
submitted and a PTC received from SCAQMD. Depending on the outcome of the
demonstration project, the Districts may have to modify the existing wet
scrubber systems to reduce VOCs. The estimated cost of the demonstration
project is as follows:
A. Consulting engineer to design testing
program, model and analyze results $140,000
B. Construction of temporary containment
structures to capture air emissions 15,000
C. Laboratory sampling and analyses 125,000
D. Pilot plant equipment, assessment of
existing scrubber technology and screening
of chemicals for effectiveness 150,000
Total 430,000
-6-
Executive Committee Report
June 28, 1989
The first step of the demonstration project will be to engage a consulting
engineer to establish the program parameters and also to perform modeling and
analyses of the results of the demonstration project. The work to date has been
performed by the engineering consulting firm, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Pirnie has
studied odor problems throughout the treatment plants and collection system,
designed the air scrubbing system for our primary clarifiers which will soon be
placed into operation, and most recently performed the necessary health risk
assessment required for the Permit to Construct the 60 mgd primary treatment
expansion at Plant No. 1. Pirnie is working on similar air emission studies in
Philadelphia, San Antonio and Minneapolis, and is pioneering work in this field.
Staff therefore recommended that Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. be engaged for an
amount not to exceed $140,000 to assist the Districts and perform the necessary
consulting engineering services for the VOCIBACT demonstration project. Pirnie,
at staff's request, has submitted a proposal (copy enclosed) which outlines the
work necessary to conduct the demonstration.
Committee Recommendation
The Committee concurs with staff's recommendation.
B. Compliance with California Air Toxics HOT SPOTS Act, (AB 2588).
Staff reported that California State Law, AB 2588, now requires large air
emission sources, such as the Districts, to conduct a detailed inventory and
assessment of the total toxic air emissions released into the air by the
facilities. Both Plants 1 and 2 are subject to this requirement. Final
guidance documents and the formal notification of this requirement were received
by the Districts on June 19, 1989. The Districts' compliance requirements begin
with submission of an inventory plan, due no later than August 1, 1989,
sufficient to describe the treatment facilities emissions for a list of 326
substances.
Wastewater treatment facilities have many processes that can potentially
release volatile compounds to the air. The large number of sources in the
treatment plants will take a considerable effort in time and resources to
adequately identify and include in an acceptable inventory and plan in order to
comply with the very short time frame imposed by the State's August 1, 1989
deadline. The Districts' staffing .is not sufficient to conduct the study to
comply with the state reporting requirements. Therefore, expert consultant
support is needed immediately to proceed with preparation and submission of the
inventory and plan to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
for review and approval.
The staff further reported that it had identified Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
as the most qualified firm to assess, quantify, and report the emissions of the
326 listed substances. Malcolm Pirnie has considerable prior experience with
the Districts' odor control projects and air emission testing for new
facilities, including work for the new 60 mgd primary treatment expansion at
Plant No. 1 (see discussion above). Their qualification is enhanced because of
Malcolm Pirnie's association with Franklin 0. Dryden, a Southern California
-7-
Executive Committee Report
June 28, 1989
environmental consultant who has been working with Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTWs) in California, including our Districts, to conduct a state-wide
pooled effort for testing air emissions from wastewater treatment process units.
Results of the state-wide efforts will be included in our inventory and plan to
be submitted on August 1st. Further, some of Malcolm Pirnie's work on the
aforementioned projects can be incorporated into the AB 2588 report thus
avoiding duplicate work and reducing the cost and effort.
The necessary consulting services for the AB 2588 Compliance Program will
be split into three phases. Phase I will include the preparation of the
inventory and plan and its submission to SCAQMD. At a later date, Phase II will
involve emission testing, estimation and reporting as identified in the approved
Phase I inventory and plan. If the Districts identify significant emissions in
the report to SCAQMD, then a health risk assessment of those emissions will also
be required. This risk assessment would constitute Phase III of the AB 2588
Compliance Program. Consideration by the Directors of arrangements for the
Phase II and III work would be in the future.
The scope of work for Phase I of the AB 2588 Compliance Program includes
the preparation and submission of the inventory and plan including the results
of the state-wide POTW pooled effort as it relates to the Districts' wastewater
treatment unit processes. In addition, all requirements listed in the state
guideline document will be included.
The anticipated cost for services by Malcolm Pirnie to prepare, submit and
provide technical support for the Phase I inventory and plan is estimated to be
between $75,000 and $100,000 with an initial estimate of $85,000.
Because of the short time available to complete the work, Districts' staff
reported that it had issued a purchase order to Malcolm Pirnie in the amount of
$25,000 pursuant to its procurement authority to begin the consulting effort.
Staff then recommended that the Directors authorize an increase in the
purchase agreement with Malcolm Pirnie for the professional consulting services
to a total amount not to exceed $100,000 for the completion of Phase I of the AB
2588 Compliance Program. -
Committee Recommendation
The Committee concurs with staff's recommendations.
4) Construction Project Change Order Practices.
Staff reported that the draft Master Plan presently under consideration by
the Boards projects that over the next 10 years new sewage facilities
construction or re-construction will total almost $1 billion. As part of this
massive construction program, the Districts currently have 107 projects totaling
$598 million in various stages of planning, design or construction.
`/
-8-
Executive Committee Report
June 28, 1989
Staff further reported that the Sanitation Districts' construction program
Is somewhat unique in that it must manage over a $100 million of new construction
or re-construction each year and at the same time coordinate the construction
projects in such a manner that we can continue to keep the treatment plants
running around-the-clock and also continue to meet the environmental standards
imposed by state, federal and local regulatory authorities.
Any major construction program involves numerous construction projects and
the inevitable change orders that are a normal part of the construction process.
Staff noted that as the Districts' construction program continues to expand,
more and more change orders will come before the Boards of Directors for
approval and referred the Committee Members to the enclosed report prepared by
staff that reviews the Districts' construction contract change order practices.
Several Committee Members commented on how helpful the staff's report had
been in understanding the nature of change orders on the Districts' massive
construction program, and the policies and procedures followed in the change
order process. It was observed that most of the Districts' individual
construction projects are larger than the total budgets of many of the
Districts' member agencies.
The consensus of the Committee is that the change order practices have
served the Districts' well in the past and that there is no need to modify them
at this time.
5) Boards' Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee.
The Committee members discussed the Impact on the Districts of emerging
issues as generally set forth in the '2020 VISION• Action Plan now under
consideration by the Boards and the Districts' budgetary projections. These
include the extensive construction of master planned sewerage collection,
treatment and disposal facilities; compliance with evolving water, air and land
environmental regulations and the need to conserve water and to recycle both
water and solid residual materials derived from the sewage treatment process.
It was the consensus of the Committee that a separate Directors' Committee
that could focus its attention on research and implementation of programs
focusing on water conservation and reclamation and reuse of sludge would be
appropriate. The Joint Chairman reported that the Boards' existing Water
Reclamation Committee would be reorganized to include conservation, reclamation
and reuse activities. Several Directors indicated their interest in serving on
the reorganized Committee.
6) Change of Regular July Executive Committee Date.
After polling the Committee members the Joint Chairman announced that the
regular July Executive Committee meeting would be changed from Wednesday,
�../ July 26th to Thursday, July 20th at 5:30 p.m. to avoid a conflict with a League
of Cities meeting in Monterey that several Directors would be attending.
-9-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
AI ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFGNNIA
1O EWS AVENUE
June 28, 1989 Ao W.0127
REF #991O23.RP EMNTNN Va 1.MIMMIA W728.8127
01. 962 an
STAFF REPORT
INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE REVISIONS
INTRODUCTION
The Districts' staff and legal counsel are proposing revisions to
the uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance for each District to
incorporate recent requirements of the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) , to clarify certain provisions, and to simplify and
streamline the administrative and enforcement procedures. The
Ordinance regulates all industrial and commercial dischargers in
the Districts' service area through its permitting and
enforcement provisions.
This report provides background information, summarizes the
proposed changes, and presents a schedule for reviewing and
adopting amendments to the Ordinance.
HISTORY OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE REGULATIONS
Recognizing the need to control the quantity and quality of
wastewater discharged to the Districts' sewerage system, the
Boards of Directors adopted the first Ordinance regulating the
use of the system in February, 1954. This Ordinance was amended
in February 1958, and again in April, 1970.
The 1970 version formally established the Districts' Industrial
Waste Division for the purpose of issuing permits, setting flow
and quality limits, and monitoring industrial discharges to the
sewerage system. Effective July 1, 1976, the ordinance was
expanded to include heavy metal discharge limits.
On July 1, 1983, the Ordinance was again amended to include
enforcement of the EPA's new categorical limits and to modify the
cadmium, copper, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides, and total
toxic organic discharge limits.
v 1
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED REVISIONS
The staff and legal counsel have drafted revisions to the 1983
Ordinance to clarify certain provisions, to simplify and
streamline the administrative and enforcement procedures, to
incorporate the EPA regulations that have been promulgated since
1983 , and to incorporate changes and additions to the Ordinance
recommended in a routine audit by the EPA, State Water Resources
Control Board, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The proposed amendments to the 1983 Ordinance fall into five
categories:
1. Additions and changes to definitions to help users
interpret the Ordinance.
2. Incorporation of other EPA recommendations to strengthen
the Districts' authority over conditions of discharge and
utilization of enforcement compliance schedules.
3. Incorporation of a waste minimization program.
4. Addition of Probation Order, Regulatory Compliance Schedule
Agreement, and Permit Suspension provisions to provide both
flexibility and strength to enforcement actions.
5. Modified appeal procedures:
a. Instead of being heard by an individual District Board,
the appeal hearings will now be by the Executive
Committee. This change recognizes that industrial
discharges impact the ,joint Treatment Works, thus all
Districts should have a voice in the outcome of
appeals.
b. Provide for right of appeal and hearing of staff's
decision on Permit Suspension and Permit Revocation by
the Executive Committee. Appeals of any other staff
decisions will be considered by the Executive Committee
and the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, decide
whether to grant or deny the request for a hearing.
REVIEW PROCEDURES
The procedures followed to amend the Ordinance begin with staff
and legal counsel reviewing the existing Ordinance and drafting
the proposed revisions. The proposed changes are then reviewed
with representatives of the industrial community and the
regulatory agencies for their input. After comments have been
received, the proposed amended ordinance is presented to the
2 `�
Executive Committee and then to the Joint Boards of Directors for
consideration.
During September and October 1988, the Districts' staff requested
input from the Industrial Waste Ad Hoc Committee and in November
1988 requested EPA to provide a preliminary review of the draft
Ordinance. More recently, a notice was sent to all Class I
permittees (approximately 450) announcing that a meeting would be
held on May 17, 1989 to review the changes made in response to:
1. Changes requested by the Executive Committee.
2. Recent changes in the Federal Pretreatment Program
regulations.
3. EPA preliminary review of the draft Ordinance.
4. Comments received from the Ad Hoc Committee.
Comments and questions received by Districts' staff from the
industrial community helped to clarify the provisions of the
Ordinance.
Other than the objection to the BOD limitation by Beatrice/Hunt-
Wesson, the major objection posed by the industrial community to
the proposed Ordinance revisions is that in the original draft a
permittee did not have the right to appeal all staff decisions to
the Directors. This recommended change to the appeal procedures
was presented by staff and General Counsel to the Executive
Committee as summarized in the attached memorandum from Mr.
Woodruff. The intent of the proposed appeal procedures was to
expedite the decision-making process to resolve routine or
relatively minor permit and enforcement mattersquickly and at
the staff level, yet retain appeal rights and final determination
on the important matters of permit suspension or revocation with
the Directors. Except for the staff decision to suspend or
revoke a permit (which prohibits any discharge to the sewer) , the
original draft Ordinance proposed that all other matters would be
resolved at staff level by appeal to the General Manager.
However, the original draft Ordinance has been revised by the
Executive Committee and now provides:
o An industrial waste permittee can appeal any final
action of the staff.
o All appeals will be considered and/or heard by the
Executive Committee.
o Appeals of permit suspension or revocation will be
granted a hearing by the Executive Committee.
r 3
o Appeals of any other final staff decisions will be
considered by the Executive Committee and the
Committee, in its sole discretion, shall decide whether
to grant or deny the request for a hearing.
The permittee's recourse of any final District decision is to the
courts.
SCHEDULE FOR AMENDING ORDINANCE
The proposed schedule for revising the uniform Industrial Waste
Ordinance is shown below:
ACTION ITEM COMPLETION DATE
1. Staff update report to Executive June 28, 1989
Committee on proposed Ordinance
revisions. Modify as directed.
2 . Receive EPA/RWQCB comments and modify July 1, 1989
Ordinance if necessary.
3 . File Staff Report to Boards of July 12, 1989*
Directors and first reading of
revised Ordinance.
4. Districts ' Board Meeting - second August 9, 1989*
reading and hearing on revised
Ordinance.
5. Effective date of the Ordinance. September 8, 1989
* Readings may be delayed if the EPA comments are substantial or
are not received by July 1, 1989.
RVL:JW:lab
REF 4991023.RP
4 `�
�. IRNI MALCOLM PIRNIE,INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS,SCIENTISTS A PLANNERS
June 14, 1989
Mr. Thomas M. Dawes, P.E.
Director of Engineering
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
RE: VOC/HRA Project
Confirmatory Testing and
Demonstration Project
Dear Mr. Dawes:
As a result of recent negotiations among AQMD, Districts and Pirnie
representatives, two additional tasks are necessary to complete the Plant
No. 1 air toxics study in support of ongoing permitting activities.
These are:
1. Second-round air toxics sampling and analysis.
2. Demonstration project to evaluate wet scrubber performance in
removing air toxics.
The scope of work for both tasks has been developed and presented
previously to the Districts (letter of April 4 and May 9, 1989, attached
for reference). Elements are highlighted below:
SCOPE
1. Second-Round Test in - For this task we will manage the entire
'amp ingl program:
0 Interview and recommend the mobile laboratory to sample and analyze
the AQMD target compounds. We understand that the Districts will
contract directly with the selected laboratory.
0 Review and revise, as necessary, procedures and equipment necessary
to provide air samples at Plant No. 1. Notify AQMD of any
adjustments.
2 CORPORATE PARK OR BOX 751 WHITE PLAINS.NY 10802 91469Q100 TELEX 137364 FAX 91469M 9288
AALCOLM
PIRNIf
Mr. Thomas M. Dawes, P.E. June 14, 1989
Director of Engineering Page 2
o Coordinate all on-site activities with the Districts operations and
industrial waste groups.
0 Supervise on-site collection and analyses of air samples.
0 Revise the air modeling and health risk assessments if the
second-round air toxics concentrations are significantly different
than the first-round results.
o Meet with the Districts to present the results of the second-round
analyses.
2. Demonstration Study
The scope of the Demonstration Study, which AQMO has approved and
permitted, is attached (letter of 5/9/89). The Districts should budget
now for both Phase I (Mini-Plant) and Phase II (Pilot Plant) , although
the need for Phase II should be decided upon completion of Phase I.
PROJECT HOURS AND ESTIMATED COSTS
1. Second-Round Testing The cost for our services to perform the second-round effort is about
half that for the original project. An hour and cost estimate is shown
below. We understand the Districts will contract directly for
recommended laboratory sampling and analytical services.
Second-Round Testing and Revised Assessments
Estimated Billable
Classification Hours Labor*
Project UT__ 7� 6, T0
Managing Toxicologist 40 4,760
Project Scientists 100 12,700
Project Engineers 210 522007700
Expenses
Travel and Subsistance 12,000
CPU Modeling Time 200
Communication 800
Reproduction 500
SIT,05
TOTAL SECOND-ROUND BUDGET S57,970
*Overhead at 161 percent �/
r
MALCOLM
PIRNIF
Mr. Thomas M. Dawes, P.E. June 14, 1989
Director of Engineering Page 3
2. Demonstration Study
The Phase I Mini-Plant on-site testing will require two people for about
six to eight weeks, including set-up and breakdown plus engineering and
analytical support. We understand the Districts will contract directly
with the laboratory. We plan to use the same laboratory for the
second-round testing.
Demonstration Study
Estimated Billable
Classification Hours Labor*
Pro3ectDirector 40 5,200
Managing Toxicologist 60 7,140
Project Engineers 1,160 100,920
$113,260
EEx en�ses
Trave al nd Subsistance 18,000
Test Plant Equipment Rental 4,500
Communication 2,500
Reproduction 1,200
$26,200
TOTAL BUDGET (Phase 1 and Phase II) $139,460
*Overhead at 161 percent
We look forward to continuing our. professional relationship with the
Districts. If you have any questions or require additional information,
please call .
Sincerely,
MALCOLM PIRNM, INC.
Jeffrey M. Lauria, Ph.D. , P.E.
Vice President
;lb
cc: J. Wilson
Dr. R. Califano
D. May - CSDOC
B. Anderson - CSDOC
IRNI MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS & PLANNERS
April 4, 1989
Mr. Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering. .
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Re: VOC/HRA Project
Dear Mr. Dawes: +
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. would be pleased to assist the Districts in managing
a Volatile Organic Compound and Health Risk Assessment (VOC/HRA) project
at the wastewater treatment facilities. We have conducted similar
leading edge studies .for plants in Texas, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and
Virginia and we will bring our experience to bear on your project.
Problem
VOCs are organic carbon molecules found in wastewaters which easily
vaporize during treatment. Some VOCs are of concern to human health via
inhalation and/or ingestion. Within the last 12 months, we have noticed
increased regulatory agency activity concerning VOC emissions at
wastewater treatment plants from a strictly health impact point of view.
In each case, nuisance odors from the treatment plants preceeded the
interest in VOCs.
Approach
We understand that the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD)
is requiring an assessment of the incremental impact of VOC emissions as -
a result of new wastewater facilities and odor control construction. The
results of such studies likely will be considered by AQMD in granting
operating permits for the additional facilities.
It is important to note that, in our experience, the scope of this
VOC/HRA project will develop from ongoing negotiations among District,
Malcolm Pirnie and AQMD representatives. Accordingly, the general
approach described below may change . substantially and should be
considered preliminary.
2 conPOnATE PMK Dn. 00x 751 VMITE PLAINS.NV 105M. 414l .- 1 +� �+•+++.•
MALCOLM
IRNI
Mr. Thomas M. Dawes April 4, 1989
Director of Engineering Page 2
Task 1 - Establish a Technical Advisory Panel
Identify and select representatives from the Districts, Malcolm Pirnie
and AQMD to participate in a Technical Advisory Panel (TAP). The TAP
role will include project definition, information exchange, and
negotiations for developing all project procedures, especially in the
sampling, air analysis, modeling and health risk assessment areas.
Task 2 Prepare Draft Project Workplan '
Prepare a detailed draft project workplan to include all tasks,
procedures, practical objectives, schedules and deliverables. Obtain
comments of the TAP and secure approval of the workplan by an authorized
AQMD representative. The workplan will be divided so that early work can
be initiated while later tasks are negotiated.
Task 3 - Finalize Target Compound List and Analytical Methods
We understand that the Districts have• already secured AQMD direction on
VOCs for analysis and associated sampling protocols. We will review this
information and concur with recommended procedures or suggest
modifications/clarifications for intended detail , as necessary.
Task 4 - Conduct VOC Sampling
In accordance with the approved workplan (Task 2) , we propose to conduct
VOC sampling at plant sources for target compounds. We suggest that you
plan for at least three rounds of sampling: Baseline sampling without
odor control devices operating, followed by sampling with odor control
devices installed, plus confirmatory sampling at several locations.
We will deliver the samples to a certified California lab acceptable to
the Districts and AQMD. Either VOC Testing, Inc. or ENSA laboratories
are preferred candidates at this time.
Task 5 - Conduct Air Dispersion Modeling
Utilizing the models already developed for permitting the odor scrubbers
(to the greatest extent possible), we will estimate the mass emission
rates, kinetics and receptor concentrations of target VOCS. Results will
be presented in both tabular and isopleth formats, the latter to
spatially. represent the concentration pattern in the vicinity of the
facility.
Task 6 - Conduct Health Risk Assessment i
Airborne contaminant concentrations estimated at various receptor points cV/
in the vicinity of the facilities will be compared to standards and
PIRNIE
Mr. Thomas M. Dawes April 4, 1989
Director of Engineering Page 3 -
guidelines for exposure based on regulatory and toxicological references.
AQMD and State of California standards, as available, will be used in the
assessment. Where standards are unavailable, we may negotiate guidelines
with AQMD. As necessary, we can conduct multipathway health risk
assessments that consider contaminant deposition and evaluate ingestion
and skin contact expsoures in addition to inhalation. Excess cancer
risks, as well as non-carcinogic risks, can be estimated based on
dose/response models for each contaminant.
Task 7 - Conduct Workshops
In our experience, VOC/HRA issues are highly visible and complex. It
will be useful to conduct workshops for the District staff and board .
members at key project milestones. Initially, we suggest conducting a
seminar in VOC/Health Risk Assessments by our Air Toxics and
Toxicology Staffs for selected Districts staff at our White Plains
locations. Other workshops will be developed for presentation to staff
and the Board at the Districts offices throughout the project.
Task 8 - Prepare Assessment Documents
Prepare Project Assessment Documents in accordance with AQMD guidelines
and assist the Districts in gaining operating permits for the new
facilities.
Task 9 - Engineering Assessment for VOC Removal
If necessary to reduce VOC emissions, we will evaluate VOC emission
reduction strategies to comply with permit requirements. Strategies may
include emission credits (negotiated using wet scrubbers vs no
scrubbers) and mechanical systems which can remove VOCs from the foul
air.
Cost
Based on completed studies, this VOC/HRA work, should cost between $75,000
and $200,000, excluding laboratory analytical work. (We understand the
Districts will contract directly for laboratory analytical services.)
However, it is likely that this study effort will be negotiated with AQMD
as the study progresses and that unforeseen tasks may be required. Since
we expect a moving scope of services, we suggest the Districts budget
$95.000 now, with the ability to increase the costs later, if necessary.
A initial cost estimate is shown below in accordance with the attached
schedule of standard charges.
MALCOLM
PIRNIF
Mr. Thomas M. Dawes April 4, 1989
Director of Engineering Page 4
Estimated Billable
Classification Hours Labor*
Project Director 120 $15,600
Managing Toxicologist ISO $21,420
Project Scientists 140 $14,280
Project Engineers 210 $18 270
69,570
Expenses
Travel and Subsistance $21,000
CPU Modeling Time S 2,000
Communication S Boo
Reproduction $ 500
24,300
TOTAL INITIAL BUDGET $93,870
* Overhead O 161 percent
I will serve as Project Director and Dr. Richard Califano will be Health
Risk Assessment Manager.
Thank you for the opportunity to continue our professional
relationship with the Districts. If you have any questions or desire an
on-site meeting, please call .
Sincerely,
MA COLM PIRN1 INC.
I J .
a�taPLh.ID.t
, P.E.
V c PrBst
sb J
cc: J. Henningson
Dr. R. Califano
J. Wilson
IRNI
MALCOLM PIRNIF,INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS,SCIENTISTS A PLANNERS
May 9, 1989
Mr. Thomas M. Dawes, P.E.
Director of Engineering
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
Re: VOC Emission Control
Pilot Study Plan
Project P1-33, Plant NO. 1
Dear Mr. Dawes:
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. has prepared a Pilot Study Plan (attached) to
investigate Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for VOC in support
of P1-33 air quality permitting activities.
We believe that BACT for VOC removal at this wastewater facility exists
within the domain of wet scrubbing technologies. The objective of the
study plan is to assess the capability of the existing systems under
construction at Plant No. 1, and chemical modifications thereof,
relative to VOC removal .
We are prepared to begin immediately.
Very truly yours,
MALCOLM P RN2, INC.
eff y auria, E.
ike Pr tident
�A1It/tachment
2 CORPORATE PARK DR. BOX 751 WHITE PLAINS,NY 10602 914694-2100 TELEX 137364
u
VOC EMISSION CONTROL PILOT STUDY PLAN
PS-33 Project
FOR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PLANT NO. 1
Prepared by:
MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC.
May 1989
AAALCJDW
IP RNIE
VOC EMISSION CONTROL PILOT STUDY PLAN
PLANT NO. 1. P1-33 PROJECT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose
1.2 Background
2.0 Program Description
2.1 Phase I - 50 cfm Mini-Plant
2.2 Phase 11 - 500 cfm Pilot-Plant
3.0 Methods and Materials
3.1 Phase I -
3.1.1 Equipment
3.1.2 Measurement and Recording
3.2 Phase II
IP RNIE
i
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emission
control pilot study is to support the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County Plant No. 1, P1-33 project (Primary
Clarifier d6 - 815) air quality permitting activities. This
plan provides an overview of the proposed pilot study. The
objective of this study is to assess the existing scrubbing
technology presently being installed for odor (1125) control at
Plant No. 1 and various other emission control alternatives,
for effectiveness of VOC removal in this wastewater treatment
plant application.
A Best Available Control Technology (BACT) demonstration
analysis for ROG's and air toxics, associated with the Plant
No. 1 P1-33 project, is in progress. This BACT demonstration
includes a review of alternative technolgies. Preliminary
indications are that -BACT for this application can be
considered wet scrubbing. A more formal presentation of the
BACT analysis is in preparation and is scheduled for
completion at the end of this month (May 1989).
1.2 Background
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California are
expanding their wastewater facilities and are constructing odor
control systems at their Plant No. 1. Gas phase collection and
treatment is extensive using aluminum odor containment structures
and packed bed wet scrubbers.
The Districts currently is concluding construction, costing about
20 million dollars, solely to reduce odorous emissions from its
treatment facilities. This voluntary program, concerned mainly
with removal of Hydrogen Sulfide (H S) and organic odors, is also
expected to remove VOC. The project isexpected to be completed by
late summer 1989. To grant operating permits for additional
wastewater facilities, the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) is requiring an assessment of the incremental
impact of VOC emission, including a health risk assessment.
The Districts engaged Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. to assist in managing
the Volatile Organic Compounds and Health Risk Assessment project
at their wastewater treatment facilities. VOC sampling and
testing, as approved by SCAQMD, is presently underway. As a part
of this project, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. has- prepared this plan for a
�•/ pilot plant study for evaluating VOC removal at Plant No. 1.
MqL(O _ -1-
hI RNIF
VOC removal is expected with operation of the new systems, however,
actual VOC removal now is uncertain since:
o Full-scale systems are not yet completed.
o Design criteria for VOC are not developed since the project
focus has been H2S and odor removal .
The Districts has agreed to conduct a pilot study to determine the
best available control technology for VOC emission at Plant No. I.
2.0 Program Description
This on-site pilot plant study will consist of up to two phases.
Phase I will be a 50 cfm mini-plant scale study, while the plan for
Phase II is a 500 cfm pilot plant scale. study. These phases are
discussed below.
2.1 Phase I - 50 cfm Mini-Plant
During this first phase, a 50 cfm mini-plant will be used to screen
different scrubbant chemicals for their effectiveness on both VOC
and odor (H S) removal. In our experience, the results of the
mini-plant L�Esting together with verified mass-transfer scale-up
factors, results in adequate criteria for full-scale design.
However, in the case of sparingly soluble compounds, where partial
removal is demonstrated in the mini-plant, larger media absorption
may be necessary. BACT for both VOC and odor removal for Plant No.
1 will be identified and compared with the technology presently
being installed at Plant No. 1 for H2S and odor control .
At present (beginning of May 1989) , an air and water quality
monitoring program is being conducted at Plant No. 1. This program
is intended to identify which volatile organic compounds and metals
are present in the air and water and in what concentrations. The
analytical schedule for this pilot plant study will depend in part
upon the findings of this monitoring program.
The following detailed description reflects our present
understanding. If warranted, changes will be made after completion
of the monitoring program.
2.1.1 Installation - Mini-plant will be installed, including
e ec, ciTair and water hook-ups. Mini-plant will be
water tested. SCAQMD will be invited to inspect
facilities.
MALCOLM -2-
2.1.2 Pr�eliminair run�s - The purpose of the preliminary runs
is t dev�p a methodology for this program. The
combined low concentration VOC and odor removal scrubbing
is not a standard requirement. Therefore the methodology
of operation, frequency and type of sampling as well as
the methods of sample analysis need to be developed. The
screening of different chemicals will require a fast
characterization of VOC. During these preliminary runs
we will test the following VOC characterization methods:
a. For the air samples:
- HNu-meter (measures total hydrocarbons)
- Photo Vac (portable gas chromatography)
b. For the VOC in scrubbant samples:
- Total carbon analyzer (measures total
organic carbon)
C. Confirmatory analyses will be performed on
samples collected for laboratory analysis of
VOC. Additionally, consideration is being
given to locating portable GC/MS capability
on-site during the testing program to
facilitate VOC analyses.
Subsequently, we will finalize the mode of operation,
frequency of sampling and other analytical requirements.
2.1.3 Scrubbants Screenin Screening different chemicals
or their. e ectiveness to remove both VOC and odor (H S)
will be tested during this portion of the pilot plidnt
operation.
The following scrubbants will be tested:
a. Scrubbants which are considered for odor
control at the present time for Plant No. 1.
- Sodium hydroxide (caustic)
- Combination of sodium hydroxide and
chlorine.
b. Other scrubbants
- caustic plus hydrogen peroxide
- hydrogen peroxide
- potassium permanganate
- combination of potassium permangante and
sodium hydroxide.
- Others which may be specified later.
2.1.4 Optimization of the selected alternative(s) - The most
/ promising combination of chemicals—for scrubbing will be
further optimized to achieve the best possible results.
MALCOW -3-
IRNI
LJ
2.1.5 Demonstration runs - The results of this pilot plant
study willbe demonstrated in controlled continuous
operation of the best recommended alternative(s) .
For comparison the pilot plant will be also operated to
simulate the odor control system presently being
installed at Plant No. 1.
2.2 Phase II - 500 cfm Pilot Plant (if necessary)
If necessary, a second phase, 500 cfm pilot plant may be operated
on-site to confirm removal of both VOC and odor by the BACT
technology. During this phase, the BACT identified in phase one
will be further optimized and long term performance will be
demonstrated.
Additional treatment alternatives will be considered, as warranted.
3.0 Methods and Materials
3.1 Phase I - 50 CFM - Mini-Plant Unit
3.1.1 Equipment
The 50 cfm mini-plant is a multi-stage system of two
packed tower absorption units. A schematic diagram of
this unit is presented in Enclosure A.
The absorption towers are 6 in. diameter PVC pipes packed
with a 5 ft. bed of size No. 1/2 saddle packing (Maspac
brand). The scrubbant is pumped from a 5 gal , recycle
reservoir by two recycle pumps (one for each tower) . The
capacity of these pumps is 1.5 gpm (corresponding recycle
rate ratios are in the range up to 25 gpm per 1000 cfm).
Chemicals are added into this reservoir either batch-wise
or continuously by a chemical dosing pump.
The mini-plant is equipped with two fans, one at the
intake side, the second one at the exhaust from the
adsorption column.
Air flow meters are also located at the inlet and the
outlet sides . Four inch flexible hose is required to
connect this pilot plant to an air space of the tested
environment.
There is a provision for air sampling of the inlet as
well as the exhaust from each column. Manometers for the \.
pressure drop measurements are also installed at the
inlets and outlets of each column.
MqWJDW -4-
IP RNIE
,.r
3.1.2 Measurements and Recording
The following are the operating parameters which will be
measured and recorded:
- Scrubber air flow rate
- Scrubbant flow rate
- Scrubber pressure drops
Scrubbant characterization - For each scrubbant one or
more characteristics will be measured periodically during
each run. Following is the list of measurements for the
Scrubbant characterization:
- pH
- Redox potential
Conductivity
- Particular ion concentration
- TOC (Total organic carbon)
VOC in the Air Characterization - During the scrubbant
screening trial a fast VOC determination method will be
needed. Use of the HNu-meter for measurement of the
total hydrocarbons or PhotoVac (portable gas
chromatography) is considered. Samples of 5 liter volume
will be collected for the laboratory VOC analysis.
H S characterization - Air samples will be collected
ig Tedlar sample bags and analyzed for H 2 S at the
mini-plant site.
3.2 Phase II - 500 cfm Pilot Plant
Enclosed is a photograph of this pilot plant during a study of a
two-phase scrubbing system at the wastewater treatment plant in
Hollywood, Florida. Further details on methods and materials will
be delivered pending results of the sampling program and Phase I.
MALCOW -5-
IP RNIE
RECIRCULATED RECIRCULATED
SCRUBBANT MIST SCRUBBANT MIST
SOLUTION ELIMINATOR SOLUTION ELIMINATOR
NOZZLE NOZZLE
PACKED PACKED
BED BED
SCRUBBER SCRUBBER
AIR AIR
FLOW / O RECIRCULATIONq\ [RECIRCULATION FLOW
METER FLOW OW METER
METER TER EXHAUST
ODOROUS
AIR FEED
...__._.. .... . FAN
AN
SCRUBBANT SCRUBBANT
SOLUTION RECIRCULATION SOLUTION RECIRCULATION
RESERVOIR PUMP RESERVOIR PUMP
COUNTY SANITATION UISIRICI
OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIF.
SMALL PILOT PLANT SYSTEM
PILOT PLANT SYSTEM
WET SCRUBBER
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM
FNrlOglIRF A
22. R 9 C 4 S 9 P Y.i v M P I WH Z T Z P LAIN S NY. P C
RNI MALCOLM PIRNIE,INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS S PLANNERS
June 22, 1989
Mr. Blake P. Anderson
Director of Technical Services
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Re: AB 2588 Compliance Program
Proposal for Phase I
Preparation of Emission Inventory Pler
Dear Mr. Anderson: P
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. is pleased to provide you with this proposal to
assess the Districts in complying with A8 2588, the California Air Toxics
"Hot Spot" Information and Assessment Act of 1987. We have prepared a
scope of work and a budget for developing the Emission Inventory Plan,
which will serve as Phase I of the Districts' compliance program.
Subsequent phases of the program, i .e. , implementation of the plan and
preparation of any health risk assessments which may be required, are not
Included in our proposal . We can prepare scopes of work for them at
your direction. We will complete the Emission Inventory Plan by the
August 1, 1989 deadline which has been set by AS 2588. We propose to
supplement Malcolm Pirnie's professional staff with the technical
services of Mr. Franklin D. Dryden, who will bring to the project his
extensive knowledge of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) in California. We believe that
this teaming arrangement will provide the Districts with a high quality
Emission Inventory Plan which will be acceptable to the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) . As you know, we have worked with
Mr. Dryden on other projects for the Districts.
SCOPE OF WORK
The Emission Inventory Plan must address potentially 326 toxic substances
which have been identified by reference in AB 2588. The Plan must
provide a comprehensive and detailed description of the methods that will
be used to quantify air releases or potential air releases from all
points of release within the Plant Ho. 1 aid Plan: No. 2 bounoaries. We
propose to include in the plan the following:
2CORPORATE PARK DR. BOX 731 WHITE PLAING,NY 10E02 SU4944100 TELEX 137364 PAX 914E94.028E
oe. 22. e 9 04 : 59 PM -MP I VVH I T8 PLAINS N`l. P 03
IRNI
Mr. Blake P. Anderson June 22, 1989
Director of Technical Services Page 2
o Flow diagrams which consist of comprehensive schematic drawings of
all process flows which affect the nature or quantity of potential
toxic air emissions.
o Specification of emission quantification methods for each emission
point on the flow diagrams: included will be the substances emitted
and the source test method or other measurement method which will be
used to quantify releases of the substances.
o Source test protocol which describes how each source test method
will be applied to each emission point where source testing is
required; the effectiveness of odor controls in controlling toxic
releases will be addressed.
We envision the following tasks as being necessary to prepare the
Emission Inventory Plan:
Task 1: Develop Strategy and Project-Work Plan
We propose to meet with appropriate members of the Districts staff during
the week of June 26 to discuss protect implementation.
Task 2: Prepare Flow Diagrams
We will work with your staff to gather all necessary information on the
processes, and compile it into the appropriate format.
Task 3: Prepare Specification of Emission Quantification Methods
We will review the locations and potential types of toxic releases at
both Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 and, based upon this information and our
knowledge of toxic emissions sampling methods, we will specify the
appropriate methods to be implemented in Phase II of the Compliance
Program.
Task 4: Prepare Test Protocol
This task will entail describing exactly how the test methods developed
in Task 3 will be applied to each emission point. The protocol will form
the basis for selection of a sampling/analysis team.
Task 5: Compile Elements of Plan
The Emission Inventory Plan will be compiled from the work products of
Tasks 2-4.
06. 22. 89 O4 : 89 PM *NPI vvml ix PLAINS NY. PO4
MALCam
PIRNIE
.� Mr. Blake P. Anderson June 22, 1989
Director of Technical Services Page 3
Task 6: Review Plan with the Districts
We propose to meet with appropriate Districts staff to discuss the plan
and incorporate any comments into a final document for submittal to
SCAQMD.
Task 7: Meet with SCAQMD
We will present the completed Emission Inventory Plan to the SCAQMO
staff.
Task 8: Respond to SCAOMD Comments
Comments made on the Plan by SCAQMD staff will be addressed.
BUDGET
We estimate that the Emission Inventory Plan will cost between $75,000
and $100,000, depending upon the number of toxic contaminants and the
number of potential sources. We suggest that the Districts authorize an
initial budget of $85,000, however, since the scope of work is not fixed
we suggest that you retain the ability to increase the budget if
necessary.
An initial cost estimate is shown below, in accordance with the attached
schedule of standard charges.
Estimated Billable
Classification Hours Labor*
ro ect rector I — Tr=O
Senior Associate
(F. D. Dryden) 85 $10,115
Project Manager 150 $15,300
Project Engineers 300 $2�6 ,1000
Expenses
raT -va nd Subsistence $19,000
Communication $ 800
Reproduction $ 700
,SOD
TOTAL INITIAL BUDGET $851015
• Overhead 0 161 percent
06. 22. B9 04 : 69 PM + Ml2 WRITS PLAINN NY. P05
PIRNIE
Mr. Blake P. Anderson June 22, 1989
Director of Technical Services Page 4
I will serve as Project Director and Mr. John W. Wilson will be Project
Manager.
Thank you for the opportunity to continue our professional relationship
with the Districts. If you have any questions or require an on-site
meeting, please ca
Sincere
MAL L NIE, N�L.
of re y M. Lauri a, Ph.D. , P.E. John W. Wilson
Vi President Project Manager
/lb
06 . 22. 69 04 : 59 PM wMPI WHIT8 PLAINS NY. P06
IRNI SUMMARY OF STANDARD CHARGES.
This document describes ore bests for compensation and terms of payment All ratty presented apply to services
rendered during calendar year 1989 and are subject to adjustment on January 1 of eecls subsequent year.
In addition to these fees,clients will also be responsible for any sales or value-added taxes out may apply to en-
gimeeting services performed.
I. Hourly Rates
Charges for services provided will be in accordance with the following schedule:
r Ift"iR'.annn. ffe,•ly Rer,
Grade 1 lCrecnnician) S 26/Hour
Grade 2(Technician) 29
Grade 3 (Technician) 35
Grade 4(EngineeelTecheiciam) 44
Grade 5(Enghnecerechnictan) 53
Grade 6(Project Engineer/Technician) 63
Grade 7?mjectEngineer/rect ician) 74
Grade 8(Senior Project Engineer) 87
Grade 9(Associate) 102
Grade 10(Senior Associate) 119
Grade 11 (Officer) 130
Overtime-No overtime premium is charged for project work outside of normal working hours.
Special Training-Field assignments mquiri'tg health and safety training are subject Wen additional charge of
$2/hour.
2. Other Direct Costs
All expenses incurred for a project from outside vendors will be invoiced at cost plus 10%to cover administrative
expenses. T:tese items may include,but are not limited m: shipping charges;printing;supplies;equipment;-pedal
insurance;licenses;permits;or subcontractors.
3falcolm Pimhe's in-house services will be invoiced at the following rates:
• Computers -S 10/hour for microcomputers
-S 45/hoar for CADS
-Rates for ether computers vary by application and CP 'regairr..cnts.
• Tramsponation -S 0.14/mi1e for personal or company-owned vehicles
• Reproduction S 0.11/copy for standard page sized documents
S 0.:1/square foot for blueprints
-S 0.34/square foot for sepias
-S 1.55/square foot for mylars
-S 5.5G/sheet'or CARD velum prints
S 27.501sheat for CARD mylare
-S 33.0C/sheet for CADD color prints
• Laboratory-Unit prices for sample testing,handling,and storage are available for individual asrgnmentss.
• Equipment-A schedule of usage rates for specialty equipment is available for field assignments.
3, Payment
All invoices are due and payable within 30 days of billing data.
Any attoma 's fees,court costs,or other related expenses incurred in collecting delinquent accounts shall be paid by
the client LYelirquent bills are subject m fi .ce charges of 1.5%per month.
M2 89 bl
' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
June 22, 1989 1C844 EUUS AVENUE
Po Sox a1v
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNN 92720.9127
STAFF REPORT
Review of Construction Contract
Change Order Practices
PREFACE
The Districts currently have 23 construction projects totalling
$130 million underway. Currently $480 million in projects are in
planning and design. The draft Master Plan presently under
consideration by the Boards projects that over the next 10 years,
new sewage facilities construction or re-construction will total
almost $1 billion.
Because any major construction program involves numerous
construction projects and the inevitable change orders that are a
normal part of the construction process, it is appropriate to
review the Districts' construction change orders practices.
BACKGROUND
Construction Project Interferences with Ongoing Plant Operations
It is important to recognize that the Districts' wastewater
facilities construction projects are unique when compared to most
other public works and general construction projects. Our
facilities construction or modification projects must be
integrated into the existing treatment plants in a manner so as
not to interrupt the ongoing operations and processing of 260 mgd
of sewage. We must be assured that we are able to meet the
hydraulic (flow) demands on our system and maintain process
efficiency and control at all times so that we continue to meet
the NPDES ocean discharge permit standards for protecting the
ocean. We simply cannot allow our treatment plants to shut down
and cause us to violate environmental standards. As a result, we
must often make special accommodations in managing our
construction program.
Change Order Determinations
Within this context, construction of major public works
facilities by this agency and others requires the ability to
respond to field changes in the most expeditious and economical
method. Change orders are a routine, important element of any
construction contract. It would be unusual for a contract to be
completed without some deviation from the original documents, for
any number of reasons .
Construction contract change orders are issued for each and every
deviation from the contract documents. Examples include the
addition of work, the deletion of work, modification or
substitution, time extensions and the payment of bonuses or
assessment of penalties specified in the contract. Determination
of the dollar value of such change order work is in accordance
with General Provisions and Standard Specifications (General
Provisions) adopted by the Boards of Directors.
In actuality the change order program is a management tool
necessary for total project implementation. Because of the large
volume of wastewater facilities construction work, the Directors
are presented each month with a variety of change orders.
Change orders are issued for the following reasons:
1. The addition of work not contemplated at the time of the
project but which for convenience or coordination with other
projects can best be accomplished by an on-site contractor.
2. Payment for undisclosed facilities and unforeseen site
conditions.
3. Design changes deemed necessary after the project is in the
construction phase, generally to accommodate future plans.
4. Design conflicts and omissions.
5. Extensions of time, payment of bonuses, assessment of
liquidated damages, etc.
The General Provisions which establish the procedural parameters
for the issuance of change orders (attached) are designed to keep
total project cost to a minimum.
The intent of this report is to provide background information on
the issuance of construction contract change orders, including
the Districts plan for effectively administering construction
projects and controlling total project costs. Total project
- costs include payment of consultants and staff costs for the
planning, design and construction management of the projects,
construction contract costs and, finally, the cost of change
orders.
PROJECT PLANNING AND DESIGN
Selection of Design Consultant
The Districts, long-standing policy has been to operate in such
a manner as to minimize staffing levels within the Engineering
Department. Accordingly, the Districts contract with consultants
for the design of most major projects. (Minor projects,
especially projects with a high degree of urgency, are designed
in-house. )
-2-
A design contract starts in the planning phase when staff
prepares a scope of the services requested. At that time staff's
scope must be general in nature yet specific enough to allow the
consultants to prepare a design proposal fee estimate.
Design contracts are awarded in accordance with a procurement
policy approved by the Boards of Directors (Selection and
Procurement of Engineering and Architectural Services) .
Proposals are generally requested from three or more qualified
firms; however, specialized and continuation services are usually
negotiated sole source.
The proposals request that the consultant respond to the scope of
work by outlining an approach to the design, information on the
design team, and the maximum charge. The Directors authorize a
Selection Committee to review the proposals and negotiate a fee
for consideration of awarding a design agreement by the full
Board(s) . The professional services contract is seldom awarded
to other than the firm with the lowest fee proposal. Upon
receipt of the Selection Committee's recommendation, the
Directors award a professional services contract and the design
begins.
In-House Staff Review of Design
The design contract is managed by a Districts ' staff project
engineer within the planning and design division of the
Engineering Department. The staff engineer is generally managing
between 5 and 15 projects at any one time, depending on the size
of the projects. The in-house responsibilities include review of
the consultants design effort, obtaining review from affected
operating departments within the Districts' organization and
securing the necessary permits for the project from the South
Coast Air Quality Management District, County and cities, federal
and state agencies, the Coastal Commission, the Division of
Industrial Safety, and many others. Most projects have between
50 and 300 sheets of plans and hundreds of pages of detailed
specifications.
Plans are reviewed to ensure that the best utility information is
available. All plans are transmitted to utility companies,
including power, telephone, cable, gas, oil, water and local
sewering agencies as well as others. Reviews are made at both
the preliminary and final stages.
Although the staff oversees and monitors the consulting design
engineers' work, our historical practice and staffing levels do
not provide for a detailed review of the consultants ' design. To
do so would be counter to the philosophy of minimizing staff and
hiring consultants on an as-needed basis to do the design work.
After design is completed and plans and specifications are
approved by the Boards of Directors, the project is advertised
for bids pursuant to the Boards procurement policy and applicable
state laws. During this phase contractors comments and questions
are evaluated and frequently addenda are issued to clarify
questions that arise.
-3-
The entire design process described above results in issuance and
bidding on plans and specifications with the best information
reasonably available at the time of bidding, generally "as-built"
plans. In some circumstances, better information could be
obtained, but the cost may not be beneficial to the total project
cost and, thus, the planned use of change orders is an integral
part of the design stage to minimize total project cost. An
example of this is the preparation of plans and specifications
for trunk sewer construction projects. Information regarding
utilities is gathered from owners and placed on the plans in the
locations indicated. Unfortunately, that information is always
less than perfect. when it appears that the utility is close to
the proposed location of a sewer conduit, staff will hire
contractors to excavate and determine the utility' s exact
location.
The down side of advance excavation is extra move-in/move-out
costs and inconvenience to motorists. Unless a utility has the
high potential for conflict, the practice has been to solve the
conflict problem when the contract is in progress via change
order, rather than expose each and every utility. Staff believes
that this is an economical plan. It does avoid traffic
interruptions prior to construction.
TYPES OF CHANGE ORDERS
1. Work Not Directly Related to the Contract
• This is always add-on work to the contract for either
emergency or other reasons.
A. Emergency: Occasionally the need for emergency repair
work arises unexpectedly when contractors are already
at work on the site and in the vicinity. This type of
work is assigned to the contractors with the best labor
and equipment pool immediately available to do the
work.
B. Non-Emergency: In most cases this is maintenance or
operation-oriented work deemed by staff to be desirable
to accommodate ongoing treatment plant operations. The
work is assigned to a construction contract to avoid
potential conflicts caused by bringing other
contractors into the construction contract work area,
and to avoid the additional charge of move-in/move-out
that would be incurred if a new contractor is brought
in. The most pressing reason is to avoid delays or
conflicts with the construction contract in progress
since claims for overhead extensions would result.
Completion of this type of work could possibly be
delayed to avoid the issuance of change orders.
However, delay often may adversely affect operation of
treatment and disposal systems, may cause additional
inconvenience by doubling move-in both within the plant
or to the motoring public, and may not result in any
total project savings.
-4-
2. Undisclosed Utilities
Undisclosed utilities represent a significant number of
change orders and change order items. However, as a
percentage of the total project, our experience has been
that the changes are not excessive.
Undisclosed facilities conflicts are generally caused by
incomplete records of facilities built long ago. In the
treatment plant, the as-builts belong to the Sanitation
Districts; in the collection system, they belong to the
cities and the many public and licensed operators (i.e. ,
utilities) .
Construction of facilities has been continuous in Fountain
valley since the early 1920's and within the Huntington
Beach plant since 1952. Undisclosed facilities are
encountered because as-built information is sometimes poor
from older records.
Several factors affect the designers ability to secure
correct data, including the availability of good as-built
plans and the effort placed to secure the information. The
professional engineering services procurement method leads,
perhaps indirectly, to problems with undisclosed utilities.
Designers know they must be very competitive to obtain
District contracts and rely on as-built information provided
by the Districts and/or local agencies or utility owners and
do not allocate resources for independent and exhaustive
searches. However, overall, total project costs, i.e. , the
sum of consulting design and construction management costs,
construction, and change orders, may not be adversely
affected.
To improve the treatment plant utility information produced
from past and future projects, staff has been developing
recommendations that will soon come before the Boards that
include additional staff to better record as-built
information and a computer-assisted design (CAD) system to
log plant utilities. This will not entirely resolve the
problem of undisclosed utilities/facilities since many
facilities have been in the ground thirty years or more, but
the problem can be minimized.
3. Design Changes
In this category are two subcategories which may be broadly
classified as (a) changes desired and identified after the
contract is in place, and (b) design errors. A good analogy
for design changes is the addition of a room to a house.
Once under construction, new ideas emerge and are
incorporated into the work, generally at extra cost.
V�
-5-
A. Changed Conditions
The majority of design changes are the result of new
information such as changed conditions or operational
plans identified after design. Construction of a major
facility is generally an 8- to 10-year project,
starting in the planning phase, continuing to design
and finished when the construction contract is accepted
by the Districts as complete.
These changes are submitted to the Boards of Directors
for approval before any authority is granted. in
general the changes come about because once projects
are in the construction phase, staff can then determine
the need for improvements. Most changes are identified
to improve the long-term maintenance and operation of
the facilities, such as added valves, change in piping
to avoid conflicts, adding access doors, changing the
location of components for a variety of reasons, etc.
B. Design Errors
Design errors are considered changes which cost the
Districts additional money. An example would be
construction of a wall which later has to be cored
because an opening was not identified for a pipeline.
Staff and the design engineers share the responsibility
for that type of change, and in many cases the
consultants pay for the change. whether or not the
design engineer reimburses the Districts, the actual
change order must be submitted to the Boards of
Directors for approval.
a. Other Contract Changes
This category includes time extensions, payment of bonuses,
charges for liquidated damages and adjustment of the
engineer' s originally estimated quantities.
A contractor is affected by many forces outside of its
direct control, including strikes, weather, equipment
suppliers, and, most importantly, the Districts' ongoing
operational requirements which often do not allow for
process equipment access or shutdowns as originally
scheduled. These time extensions do not generally result in
any added cost.
Changes that result in extra costs, or deductions, include
the payment of bonuses for early completion, now specified
in most contracts, and. deductions for late completion
(liquidated damages) . Both serve as an incentive for timely
completion of the work.
V�
-6-
The adjustment for engineer's estimates to actual
quantities, although generally associated with an overall
�.../ contract price adjustment, are not typically considered as
an addition or deduction to the project cost.
5. Change Order Negotiations
The attached chart shows the development and resolution of
change order issues. Costs and/or time are negotiated
between staff and the contractor. Costs are controlled by
the General Provisions. They may be based on time and
materials, or a negotiated price which is based on time and
material estimates. Overhead/profit of 15% is allowed on
labor and materials; equipment is paid at rates determined
by the state. State prevailing wage rates are used for
estimating labor charges.
Time extensions are based on delays in the project' s
critical path. Most change order items do not have a time
extension.
OTHER AGENCIES CHANGE ORDER POLICIES
Staff contacted the Irvine Ranch Water District, County of
Orange, County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles, and Los
Angeles City Sanitation Department to survey change order policy
for construction contracts within their agencies. Following are
the results of that telephone survey.
Irvine Ranch Water District:
Construction contract change orders up to $50,000 are
approved by the General Manager as long as they are less
than 30% of the total contract price. Change orders between
$50,000 and $100,000 and/or over 30% of the contract price
are approved by Committee. Change orders over $100,000 must
be approved by the Board of Directors.
County of Orange - Environmental Management Agency:
Change orders less than 25% of the contract amount or under
$25,000 are approved by staff. Change orders exceeding that
amount are approved by the Board of Supervisors.
County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County:
All change orders are approved by the Boards of Directors.
Los Angeles City:
Change orders less than $25,000 are approved by the City
Engineer. Change orders more than $25,000 are approved by
the Board of Public Works.
-7-
Typical Cost Impact of Change Orders
Staff contacted the State Water Resources Control Board and the
Environmental Protection Agency to review change order history.
Both agencies allow 5% project contingency for change orders for
work directly related to the project. Averages of the change
orders for the Districts' three major projects described below
are above that amount, generally because of requested changes not
directly associated with the project. However, the Districts -
overall experience compares favorably, particularly when work not
directly related to the contract is omitted.
EXAMPLES OF CHANGE ORDERS FOR MAJOR TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS
Three very large construction projects are now nearing
completion. The Ocean Outfall Booster Station, Job No. J-15, is
the construction of a 480 mgd outfall booster station at the
Huntington Beach treatment plant. Headworks No. 2 at Plant
No. 1 , Job No. P1-20, is the construction of a new influent
pumping and preliminary treatment facility at the Fountain Valley
plant. The third large project is the odor control project.
These three projects are nearly complete and they all have a
large number of change orders. Attached are charts which break
down each change order into the categories listed above.
Attachments
1. Section 10-6 of General Provisions.
2. Summary of Major Job Change Order.
3. Change Order Details of Major Jobs.
4. Change Order Flow Chart.
ENG/EXEC.COMM:SR4. 1 .689,-.8.689
-8-
CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURE
Flow Diagram
AApmopuwnVeETime Yn
Staff Coneaao�
AAnPIu Amount(Time Yes
Stan Prepare as Ohedar
F.C.O. Charge ON TintsV=ong
Idler Engineering
Slgrred by Yes
F.C.O. Comrepor Charge Ober ReNew Yes
AODro ed
M Suporviaor Gene Or Order
Rou
Field Change Yes No No
Order W.Cv No No
IDENTIFY NEED Prepared by
Dsig ner Inspeaor Yes No �� r
StaX 9alde
Comraaor Stan Decision Dlrmors
County as to Proceed Yes NEGOTIATE WORK,
Other No COST,AND TERMS
Yes No
No
No
No
CHANGE ORDER DENIAL
June 15, 1989
BREAKDOWN OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS
JOB NO. P1-20 (To date)
Value of Original Construction contract: $ 31,458,000
Amount Percentage
1 . Work not directly related to
contract 265,946.56 0.85%
2. Undisclosed Facilities/Site
(utilities, structures) 571 ,930. 08 1 .82%
3 . Design Changes 317,019. 54 1 .01%
4. Conflicts and Omissions 580,746 . 93 1 .85%
Total to Date 1,735,643 . 11 5.52%
JOB NO. J-15 (To date)
Value of Original Construction Contract: $ 18,476 ,243
Amount Percentage
1 . Work not directly related to
contract 96,625.64 0.52%
2. Undisclosed Facilities/Site
(utilities, structures) 198,955.95 1.08%
3 . Design Changes 161,509 .48 0. 87%
4. Conflicts and Omissions 128,111 .72 0.69%
Total to Date 585,202.79 3 .17%
'v/
Odor Control Projects (To date)
Value of Original Construction Contract: $ 15,893, 393
Amount Percentage
1 . Work not directly related to
contract 3, 328,027 . 31* 20.94%
2. Undisclosed Facilities/Site
(utilities, structures) 286,526. 84 1 .80%
3 . Design Changes 48,104.15 0. 30%
4. Conflicts and Omissions 491,782 .02 3 .09%
Total to Date** 4,154, 440 . 32 26.14%
*Includes over $3 million for repair of the primary effluent
collector; the condition of which was discovered while this
project was under construction.
**Staff anticipates additional added work to this contract,
totaling about $800,000.
10-5 RETAINED FUNDS
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 4590, the Contractor will
be entitled to post approved securities with the District or an approved
financial institution in order to have the District release funds retained by
the District to insure performance of the Contract. The Contractor, financial
institution and the District will be required to execute a separate escrow
agreement, in a form approved by District, prior to the release of retained
funds.
10-6 EXTRA WORK
(a) GENERAL
The District reserves and shall have the right, when confronted with
unpredicted conditions, emergencies, or unforeseen events, to revise
the details of the contemplated work or to add work of a different
character or function and have the Contractor perform such revised or
added work as "Extra Work," when such extra work is considered by the
District to be vitally appurtenant to the satisfactory completion of
the project.
"Extra Work" is defined as new or unforeseen work, or added work of a
different character or function and for which no basis for payment is
prescribed; or that involving revisions of the details of the work in
such manner as to render inequitable payment under items upon which
the Contractor bid; or that work to be done under "stipulated prices"
as given in the bidding schedule.
The signing of the Contract by the Contractor will be deemed to be an
agreement on his part to perform extra work, as and when ordered by
the Engineer. Notice to the sureties on the Contractor's bonds will
not be given unless the estimated total value of the Contract, as
changed or supplemented, shall exceed the original total price bid by
more than twenty-five percent (29%) .
If required extra work results in delay to the work, the Contractor
will be given an equivalent extension of time.
(b) PROCEDURE FOR EXTRA WORK
(1) Upon decision of the District to have extra work performed, the
Engineer will so inform the Contractor, acquainting the
Contractor with the essential details of the new work. The
Contractor shall thereupon prepare a price for said work based
upon an estimate of cost and submit said price and estimate to
the District whose approval shall be secured before work is
started; excepting that the Engineer may, when in the best
interests of the District, order the Contractor to proceed with
4/84 10-4
the extra work in advance of submitting the prices and cost esti-
mate. The District reserves the right to reject any claims for
extra work or for additional payment claimed as a result of
extending the work under the bid prices which has not been
approved by the Engineer in the manner herein provided.
(2) Prices for extra work shall be prepared by the Contractor in one
of the following methods, as requested by the District and sub-
mitted to the Engineer for approval.
A. For a stated unit price or lump sum amount based upon current
prevailing fair prices for materials, labor, plant, overhead,
and profit.
B. On a direct cost plus a percentage basis (force account by
the Contractor). All work done by the Contractor on a cost
plus a specified percentage basis will be computed in the
manner hereinafter described, and the compensation thus pro-
vided shall be accepted as payment in full by the Contractor,
and no additional payment will be allowed for use of small
tools, which have a replacement value of $500.00 each or
less, site superintendent's services, timekeeper's services,
pickup or yard trucks, except as specifically essential to
the work, nor any other overhead expenses incurred in the
prosecution of the force account work.
1. For all materials purchased and used in the specific
work, the Contractor will receive the actual cost of
such materials, including freight and delivery charges,
as shown by original receipted bills, to which will be
added an amount equal to fifteen percent (19%) of the
sum thereof. It shall be understood, however, that such
salvage value as may be agreed upon between the District
and the Contractor for materials which are not per-
manently incorporated in the work will be deducted from
the total amount as derived above.
2. For all labor, including foremen, engaged in the speci-
fic operation, the Contractor will receive the wage pre-
vailing and paid on the project including fringe
benefits for each and every hour that said labor, in-
cluding foremen, is actually engaged in such work, to
which will be added an amount equal to fifteen percent
(15%) of the sum thereof. In addition, the Contractor
shall be paid a sum equal to the Worker's Compensation
Insurance Premiums and the actual cost of Social
Security taxes, computed on the base rate for the class
of work involved, for the actual amount of the payroll
involved.
3. For any machinery or equipment which is deemed necessary
or desirable to use, the Contractor will be allowed a
10-5 4/84
reasonable rental price for each and every hour that
said machinery or equipment is in use on such work site.
No percentage will_ be added to the costs incurred by
such rentals or moving --
Equipment charges for extra work or delays in work shall
be in accordance with the current State of California,
Department of Transportation, Division of Construction
of Labor Surcharge and Equipment Rental Rates, as
follows:
a. Working Equipment Rates - 100% of the price listed.
b. Standby Equipment Rates - 5076 of the price listed.
(3) Labor, materials, and equipment may be furnished by the Con-
tractor, subcontractor, materialman or others on the behalf of
Contractor to perform the "Extra Work." However, the District
will deal directly with and make payments to the Contractor.
When "Extra Work" paid for on a direct cost plus a specified
perecentage basis is performed by forces other than the
Contractor's organization, the Contractor shall reach agreement
with other forces as to the distribution of the payment made by
the Districts for such "Extra Work." The specified percentage
contained herein shall be the total percentage to be added to the
direct cost whether incurred by the Contractor, subcontractors,
or other forces.
(4) Upon receipt of the Contractor's price, the Engineer will make an
analysis thereof and adopt one of the following procedures:
A. Accept the Contractor's price for lump sum or unit price
amount in the original or amended form and direct the
Contractor to proceed with the work; or direct the Contractor
to perform the work on a cost plus basis. No claim for extra
work costs shall be valid unless made in writing by the
Contractor and apporved in writing by the District.
B. Have the work performed by the District's forces on separate
contract, without undue interference or hindrance to the
Contractor and without claim or suit by the Contractor for
damages on account thereof.
10-7 INCREASE OR DECREASE IN WORK
If any change causes an increase or decrease in Contractor's cost or the
time required to perform any part of the work under the Contract, whether or
not changed by any order, the District shall make an equitable adjustment and
modify the Contract in writing. In the case of defective specifications for
which the District is responsible, the equitable adjustment shall include any
increased cost Contractor reasonably incurred in attempting to comply with those
defective specifications.
4/84 10-6
' t3-Jun-89
CS➢0C
P1-20
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT #31,458,000.DO
I CHANGE 1 FCO/ 1 DESIGN 1 UNFORSEEN 1 CHANGES
1 ORDER 1 PLAN 1 ITEM 1 DISTRICTS I CONFLICTS/ 1 SITE 1 FOR FUTURE
1 NO. . CHANGE 1 REQUEST 1 OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS , PROJECTS
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________1
1 1.01 1 FCC #12 I RELOCATE BULK CL2 TANK $113,194.00 1
I 2.01 1 FCC III I BIN LOADING RELOCATION $35.847.00 I
2.02 1 FCO 11, 1 EAST PERIMETER ROAD
1 3-10,14, 1 MODIFICATIONS 1 $15,365.00 I
1 17,22,23 1
3.01 1 PCH 1I7 1 LNSTR. D COMM. CABLE i ,
FCO #20 1 MODIFICATIONS $33,609.00
3.02 1 FCO 135 I ADDIL PAVING FOR
1 BIN LOADING AREA $3,554.00 I
1 3.03 ?C4 47,13 I '
1 FCO #34 I WATER LINE RELOCATIONS 1 . 520,427.6C I
3.04 I FCC #46 1 MOD. TO CL. SOL. LINE i i #5,520.00
3.05 I FCC #21 ". 8 :NCH PN REROUTE I s:C.529.00
1 3.06 1 FCC 143 1 SUPPLY PERSONNEL TRAILER i69,934SC !
1 COMPLEX
1 3.07 1 FCU 119 I MAINT. ACCESS PATH 1 $5,021.00 1•
3.33 1 ?C3 15 I PLANT RATER RERCCTE ..,.....�
1 FCC 147
3.09 FCO 416 1 REPAIR 6 INCH RATER LIE 31,306.)0
3.10 i FCC 42 1 ELEC. # CONSTR. TRAILERS $4.123.00
1 4.01 FCO 424 16 INCH PN VALVE $421.00 1
4.02 : FCC #LB TAANSITE PIPE REMOVAL 0368.00
i.03 I FCO #2L S INCH PR P07RDLING i747.00
#B
\� 4.04 ! ?CL 182 ADD CIRCUIT 4AB401 436.912.00
_. ..-. 3E9:53L 3" UND:SCL2FZB
13-Jun-89
CSDOC
PI-20
�7 CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $31,458,000.00
1 CHANGE 1 FCC/ I i DESIGN 1 UNFORSEEN CHANGES
1 ORDER 1 PLAN 1 ITEM 1 DISTRICTS I CONFLICTS/ I SITE 1 FOR FUTURE
I N0. I CHANGE 1 1 REQUEST 1 OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS { PROJECTS
I------------------------------------------------- ---.--...---..--.--------------------------------------
1 4.06 I FCO 026 1 REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED I 1 03,475.00 1
1 UNDERGROUND VAULT
I -
1 4.07 1 FCO 128 1 ADD'L COMM. CABLE 1 1 $22,750.00
I
1 4.09 1 FCO 132 1 ADD'L BREAKER 1 15,333.00 1 1i
1 4.01 1 FCO 136, 1 UTILITY RELOCATION I i 1 132,924.00 1
1 36A,3S 1 AND SUPPORT
i 4.10 ! FCO 140 ' ADD'L TERMINAL STRIPS 1 $5,276.50
I PIN 115
I
4,S1 I FCO 142 1 REROUTE TELEMETRY CABLE i i $0,601.00 1
• I I
1 5.01 1 FCO 455 1 ADD'L CDNOUIT AND CABLE 1 1 $15,308.34 1
TRAY SUPPORTS
i •
I 3.02 1 FCC 154 1 AOD'L CONDUIT IN M 4 0 i 66.05 '
I PCH 126 1
I
I 5.03 FCO 153 1 4 INCH NG RELOCATION i i f2''u—'00 1
3.0= FCO 451 1 BL3CX %ALL FUR
CATCH BASIS
FCO 050 1 ADD'L TERMINAL 3.1.
5,0E ! FCO 045 1 AOD'L INS7R, CABLE t
PCH 4 4
5.07 FCC 433 ADD'L CUM. CABLE s58,3?5.D0
I PCH 114 1 CONDUIT AND SUPPORTS
i
S.01 1 RF'. 4100E ADD CURRENT ISOLATORS 1 $1.657.00
5.02 ! FCO 141 1 ASLOCATE 1134T BTANBARO i2,6v'7.5D 1
i ! 6.03 1 `CII'eL. .. - 7EaM1NAL BOXES 62,071.I0
\_/ PCN 135
6.34 FCC IS6 1 IRRIGATION LINE AEPAIB
AK 10CATIDN
i3-Ian-B9
CSDOC
P1-20
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
`.►
ORIGINAL-- - - CONTRACT 431,458,000.00
e 1 CHANGE 1-- FCO/ .................... ...__.._.:.f:__:::::______;. DESIGN -�_��� - UNFORSEEN �� L•CHAMBER
1 ORDER 1 PLAN 1 ITEM 1 DISTRICTS 1 CONFLICTS/ 1 SITE 1 FOR FUTURE
1 NO. 1 CHANGE 1 1 REDDEST 1 OMISSIONS I CONDITIONS 1 PROJECTS
--_----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 6.05 1 ---- 1 MONTH PERIMETER TEMPORARY i 1 1 (420,000.00) 1
1 ROAD DELETION
1 6.06 1 FCO 149 1 ADO TEMPORARY AC PAVING 1 $42,620.00 1
1 6.07 1 FCO137,48 1 TEMPORARY PARKING LOT i 113,052.00 1
1 PCH VIE 1 MODIFICATIONS ,
1 6.06 1 ..._ 1 ALTERNATE BASE MAT'L 113,591.00) 1
1 6.09 1 PCH 121 1 ICT. STRUCTURE B
1 BULKHEAD SUBSTITUTION 1 s9,291.00 1
6.10 1 FCC 466 1 12 :N. STORM DR. MODS. 1 02,933.00 1
)
' 6.11 1 FCORS9,S9 1 4 IN. GAS LINE REPAIR I Ii3,152.00
1 1
1 7.01 1 PCH 131 1 NORTH PERIMETER ROAD I
1 1184.681.00 1
1 ?C3 171 1 MODIFICATIONS
7.02 : ?CH 131 NORTH PERIMETER ROAD !13$812.00) 1
1 FCC R71 1 SURFACE SUBSTITUTION
1.03 PCH 4S2 ADDITION OF CIRCUIT
FCC 162 1 BREAKER ENCLOSURES
7.04 FCC BEd 1 DIS3:CT 11,5 WASS
7.05 FPO 167 1 3'.Bi R!CT 1! METER RUN BYPASS : i51.000.00
i 6.0! 1 PCH D32 : MODIFICATION OF P.B. 11 13.9!6.00
• ?CO 164 1 ?UMP CNTRL. CIRCUITS
8.02 1 7CH 140 1 DUCT BANK REROUTE I i s1.914.20 1
. FCD 1E: : AT -UNNE- 1.
'AAl �C81T0AY.:S SYS"EN. - -
---- 3::? ?LATE GUIDE MDD'S
S.'E FB3 169 AS3E ...
'ICE 3
13-Jun•A9
CSDOC
PI-20
CHANGE CRIER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT 131,458,000.00
1 CHANGE 1 FCDI 1 i 1 DESIGN 1 UNFORSEEN 1 CHANGES
1 ORDER 1 PLAN 1 ITEM 1 DISTRICTS 1 CONFLICTS! 1 SITE FOR FUTURE
1 NO. 1 CHANGE 1 REQUEST 1 OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS PROJECTS
1_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________1
9.01 1 _--• 1 HOT WATER CONVERTER 1 $5,541.00 1
1 TUBE MATERIAL CHANGE
1 9.02 1 PCH 844 1 BOILER AREA NODS. 1 1 $5,746.00 ;
9.03 1 ---- 1 PROJECT DELAY COSTS 1 $2,545.00 1
1 9.04 I PCH 028 1 FLOW RATIO CONTROLLER MOD: i4L.92L00
9.05 1 FCC 175 1 UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES AT i 1 $1.597.00
1 90 INCH PI LINES
1 9.06 1 FCC 476 CONCRETE BOX CONDUIT REMOVAL 1 sS41.J4 1
9.07 1 •--- 1 PRECAST PILE NODS. i $47,356.00 1 311C,591.00
9.09 1 ---- 1 AOO'L PILE FOOTAGE i $6,125.00 314,251..J i
1 ADJUSTMENT OF OTY.
1 .0.01 1 FCO A70 1 36 INCH ELLIS AYE.
PCH TRUNK R •]CATION i S!95,:54.00
. 11.01 ?CH 44 1 TUNNEL 13 MO➢IFICATIONS i $9,372.7:
FCO RA2
' 11.02 F.3 183 1 SAMPLER BLDG. MODS 1 E2,250.00 I ,
.•�. •--- ; CV PIPING REPLACEMENT 11.651.00 1
12.01 1 FCO'.90 S IN. PLANT WATER RELOCATION
. !2.32 FC3 181 ;RCIATION VALVE ADDITION 14.595.00
AA TER ::NE REF:4IR M1,327.0
?CN 456 .-:➢CH L.n... -..: ADD1':ON
2.05 F. 442 8T3GL C:RCS:T
. ---- BS:L:E 3i ATIBR 4EM07E ALARM
:A'SE
13-Jun-B9
CSOOC
PI-20
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $31,452,000.00
....................
1 CHANGE FCC/ 1 i i DESIGN 1 UNFOASEEN 1 CHANGES
1 ORDER 1 PLAN 1 ITEM 1 DISTRICTS CONFLICTS/ 1 SITE 1 FOR FUTURE
1 NO. 1 CHANGE 1 REQUEST 1 OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS : PROJECTS
I______________________________________._______________________.....__._.___________________-_.._-____--_____________
112.01 1 FC➢ 1104 1 FAKAST TUNNEL LIDS t $3,013.50 1
1 FOR EXISTING TUNNEL
I 1 •
13.01 1 FCC 1103 1 3ULKHEAO CONFLICT R N A D I 13,999.00
13.02 1 FCC 173 1 CONCRETE STEP A HANDRAIL i 13,469.95 1
ADDITION TO P. B. MO. 3A i i
1 13.03 1 PER 139 1 6-INCH PN MODIFICATION 1 112,!91.00 '
FCC 177
13.04 1 FCO 112 1 SCREW CONVEYOR MODIFICATION 1 $4,200.00 1 •
!3.05 1 FCD 'BI L.'SHT STA:NDAMS IELUCATION 12,352.00
!3.06 ACM 152 : 'w-YERATDR INPUTS TO PLC $3,335.00
m 192
' 13.07 PCfi 147 1 S'AIAkAY MODIFICATION 51.241.56
Fro '95 .
. :3. 2 FCD 491 ADHERED PILE DELAY i
3.01 3I0 170, ADD'. AU➢ERED PILE F40TAGE
1 ADJUSTMENT OF QUANTITIES _:....
. :4.0: Fro AGO : CHEMICAL DRAIN PIF,% 114.919.09 I
1 SYSTEM MODIFICATION.
I4.02 PCH .54 1 SASE TRAY iOPPORTE -.Co. ......
. :4.03 FCC 1605 • BOILER VENT STACK NCO.
:5a: • 'CH 445A 1 '91P. 3C'.O BARRIER CREDIT i$3,232.527 1
...._ 3U1.1225 CL2 SCALE 'iA.9SMii SER ACOM. _
=? BEAM. 60 :?—E A'. 217
33-Jun-89
CSDOC
P1-20
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $31,458,000.00
1 CHANGE ; FCOI 1 1 DESIGN 1 UNFORSEEN 1 CHANGES
; ORDER ; PLAN 1 ITEM 1 DISTRICTS 1 CONFLICTSI SITE 1 FOR -Fi-01E
1 NO. 1 CHANGE 1 REQUEST 1 OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS ; PROJECTS
1-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 15.05 1 PCH N71 1 AREA LIGHTING MODIFICATIONS 1 t $2,020.00
1 15.06 1 ---- SAMPLES BUILDING CREDIT
15.07 1 SUBR1200 MONORAIL AND HOIST CONTROL
MODIFICATION 1493.64 ;
1 15,09 ---- ; 78-IN PIPE JOINT DELETION 'IVS.00;
15.09 1 SUB11284A 1 SCRUBBER CONTROL PANEL MOD. i $4,290.71 1
15.10 1 PER 067 1 BAR SCREEN PL. SUBSTIT. :33.31;.001 i
115.11 ; PER 0..74 ; CL2 BREATHING APPARATUS [41:756.4:;
1 i5.32 1 PCH 149 1 ELECTRICAL M.H. 4_0 100. $20,000.00 ...,---..-
1 PCH A49A ! i
PCE 469
16.01 1 PC4 R70 1 MCC MODIFICATIONS 17.279.:i
:6.,2 FCC 485 RELOC. 12-1%. TV AT T„NNEL 3 1 3G6E.77 .
:6.02 ' 'CH K: 1 OPENING iN NALL AT M A O
FCC 496 ,
16.04 1 PC' K. OELETIDN OF 90-IN. RCP ;Syi0.68)
. ..0 :11^6 i B3EAROC: ERLSTIMG TRIMBLE AT
:i.C6 ?C: :56: CABLE TRAY MCBiFLCA?::US
AT TUNNEL 02 ;,974,)g .
:6.67 ; ?CH 455 1 STOP PLATE REV:Si6NS
16.00 K'E ,v 1 REV.-TUNNEL SLABS
.,09 PCE'A50 ELETi7ti OF .. CSETE BEAK
!3-]an-B9
CSDOC
PI-20
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $31,438,000.00 .
..:.............:.....:._...:.................................................._......................................
1 CHANGE 1 FCO/ i DESIGN 1 UNFORSEEN ! CHARGES
I ORDER 1 PLAN 1 ITEM 1 DISTRICTS 1 CONFLICTS/ : SITE FOR F3^/RE
1 NO. • CHANGE 1 REQUEST , OMISSIONS CONDITIONS PROCECT.S
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
1 17.01 1 FCC 4119 1 CONTAINMENT MALL ADDITION AT 1 $1,900.00 1
1 THE FOUL AIR/CHEMICAL AREA i I ,
1 17.02 PCH 075 1 HVAC CIRCUIT MODIFICATION IN 1 i $2,358.59 1 ,
1 ?DOER BUILDING 3A
1 17.03 1 SUB 12'.'3 1 FRAME AND COVER MODIFICATION -
1 AT SUNFLOWER PUMP STATION
1 17.04 1 PCH 062 : BEAN ADDIT:BN AT TUNNEL NO 1 i f5,121.00 1
17.SS FCC 4105 1 BETER BUSS ADD!71DN AT MSO 1 $1,997.00 1
:i1UC";FE
:7.JH FCC il:i ADDITIONAL C3NDUITS ACROSS 3L9.50J.:O
1 ROADWAY
17.07 1 PCL 1303 : CONCRETE BLOCK MODIFICATION S4,174.0C 1 ,
. 17.08 : FCO 8:20 1 MIDDLE ROAD OBSTRUCTION .,_.....
1 19.01 1 FCO Bile 1 CONCRETE OBSTRUC'.:"U AT i
S19DLE 30AD .
16.02 1 FCO Si30 1 CONCRETE C3STRUCTION D PAVIN6 1 3l,lSS.30 i
1 AREA NEAR POWER BIDS 3A
. :8.:3 FC"a Bit? 1 TE✓.Fvr:ARY AS-SA-L' =0:NC :...-_...
. ..... F.CC 4:35 , AO9 11CAR 'CHLORINE PIPE ....
Ai BAR SCREEN CHANNELS
18.05 PCn 178 1 INSTALLATION OF ADCi IcKAL .3E4. '
:3.ii -_ 4E+ 1 ?E:NF?3C:.r.EWi N19IF:CA i.:SS � ST,g73. .
FCC 4S5 AT 7UIUK .._. 4
. • RD!CVA9LE %A.L S
KF
13-Oun-B9
CSDOc
P1-20
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $31,458,000.00
!.
1 CHANGE 1 FCO/ 1 DESIGN 1 UNFORSEEN 1 CHANGES
1 ORDER I PLAN I ITEM 1 DISTRICTS 1 CONFLICTS/ 1 SITE 1 FOR FUTURE 1
1 NO. 1 CHANGE 1 1 REQUEST 1 OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS PRO:ECTS
1---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
I I
1....................................................................:................i-------------------- ^---- -1 TOTAL 1 $263,946.36 6580,746,93 4571,334 5"17,D1:.3;
1 PERCENT OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT 1 0.85% 1.851 ! I'D^% 1 1.OlT
.............. 6!ll::::... : e a a • ! ... ! a ... ......... ........f 1,v.
l3•]wo•B9
CSOOC
J•15
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
0118INAL CONTRACT 010,476,243.00
..........................................................................................................................
1 CHANGE 1 PLAN I t I DESIGN 1 UNFORSEEN : CHANGES
1 ORDER 1 CHANGE 1 ITEM I DISTRICTS I CONFLICTS/ 1 SITE 1 FOR FUTURE 1
1 NO. 1 No. I I REIRE9T I OMISSIONS I CONDITIONS 1 PROJECTS
I•••••-••--•••••••'•••••••••••••••••••••••'•••'------•••"•'•"••••••------••••••••••••••••••------••I-----------------
1 1 I 1 1
1 I 3 1 PN Connections Hunt Tunnel I (12,160.05)
1 1 4 1 Relocate 24' overflow in 42' 309 1 $16,873.00 1
I iI
I 1 1 5 1 Manways on 120-inch pips 1 $9,251.00 I
1 1 10 1 Rip Rap 101189 Overflow 1 13,821.00 1
I
2 1 6 1 Extend 0029 Overflow Nall& 14,990.00 1
2 1 11 1 Tran&fpner& it RothrOtk 1 01,594.48) 1
2 1 16 1 Modification of 96' Pipe 1 $1,599.00 ;
I
N 2 1 21 1 Finish Hardware Rod'& i 51,464.72 1
3 1 14 1 Reinf. 1 18' Overflow pox $1,592.00 1
3 1 17 1 Door Rod's for Elect. Equip. 1 $2,904.00 1
3 1 16 ; Overhead Door Motor Revision i i $2,093.00
3 1 19 1 Reinf. at Tunnel/GOBS i $339.00 ;
3 1 22 1 Site Grading 1 Banning St. Area i i 1 150,658.48 1
3 27 1 Relocate Dewatering Location $2,201.80
4 15 1 Ballasts for Diner Circuits $169.00
4 25 1 FRP Duct Relocation $7,998.00
4 33 FRP Doct Flexible Couplings $10,503.00
4 1 34 1 Grille and Diffusers $1,912.00
PAGE
13-Jun-89
CSDOC
J-15
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $18,476,243.00
1 CHANGE ; PLAN i DESIGN I UNFORSEEN CHANGES
ORDER 1 CHANGE 1 ITEM DISTRICTS 1 CONFLICTS/ 1 SITE FOR FUTURE 1
NO. 1 NO. , REQUEST 1 OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS 1 PROJECTS
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3 1 23 1 12' Oil Decant line $59,152.00 1
5 1 30 1 Encase 10' Sludge Pipe 1 $1,755.00
5 1 35 1 2' HPA Piping at Rothrock 1 $2,440.00 '
5 1 36 1 Digester Bed Driveway 1 $2,112.00 1
6 1 37 1 Paint Storage 1 (95,439.00) ;
6 1 57 1 54' Sluice Bate 'E' Thistle Replace[ $9,393.00 1
1 1 24 1 C12 Solution Piping (15,739.00) 1
7 1 31 1 Modifications in Lighting Circuit 1 $2,316.00 1
7 1 38 Air Conditioner Alarm i 12,165.00 1
7 41 1 120' Bulkhead i 1 $11,544.00
7 44 ; Steel for YFD Blackouts 65,564.32 ,
7 48 1 Telephone k Inst. Terminal Box $622.00
7 49 1 Junction Box No. 1 11,402.00 ,
7 1 58 1 Replace Paint Primer $1,137.00 1
8 11 1 FRP Duct Support Credit 1 (110,000.00) ,
8 i 28 1 66KY Switchyard Modifications 117,855.00
8 42 1 Bactbank B 66KY Area $644.00
8 47 ; Door III Height i $937.00
8 51 ; 120' Pipe Revisions $5,292.00
PAGE 2
13-Jun-B9 -
CSDOC
J-15
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT 018,476,242.00
1 ....................... •.•••".... ••. ...... ••.CHANGE I PLAN DESIGN UNFORESEEN� - CHANGES
1 ORDER 1 CHANGE I ITEM I DISTRICTS 1 CONFLICTS/ , SITE 1 FOR FUTURE 1
I NO. I NO. , REQUEST 1 ONISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS 1 PROJECTS' 1
1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
I i i I
9 1 45 1 Valves in Exist PNPS i $373.00 1
I i I I
1 9 1 54 1 Instureontation Wiring Isolation 1 6752.00 1
I I 1 I
9 1 55 1 Instureentation Wiring 1 $14,016.00 I
1 9 1 56 1 Motor Base Reinforcement I $1,092.00
I I
9 I 61 154' Pipe Supports I 1 $4,092.00 1
I I
1 9 1 65 1 Light Panel 'DL' 1 $1,130.00 1 ,
9 I 5001 I Core Drill Pipe Access t 1 1 $1,284.00 1
I
1 9 1 9002 1 Repair Broken Pipe 1 $2,149.00 1
I
9 1 9003 1 Remove Duct6ank I $4,609.00 I
t I
9 1 9004 1 Remove Underground Obstructions 1 11,502.00 1
I 9 I 9008 1 Offset Far Ouct 12,998.00 I
10 ' 12 1 Cap Underdrains at OCB's 16,136.00 1
10 1 13 1 Slemves at Junet. Sir. for 72' RCP I $5,002.00 1
10 1 50 1 DACS Revisions $25,358.00 I
11 59 72. Overflow Structure i $5,533.00
11 i 62 1 42' Meter Line $10,909.00 '
11 i 66 1 Encase 10' CS Pipe i $1,494.00
Il i 67 I Addt'l Bulkhead Seals 1 11,180.00 I ,
11 70 1 Vibration Monitor Wiring i $6,093.00
11 76 Lover Level Lighting $2,117.00
11 9073 I Sealing Bulkhead B JBI $4,452.00
•, 3095 1 Concrete Obstruction 9 RoEhrock 11,165.00
PAGE 3
i3.Oun-B9
CGDOC
0.15
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $10,476,243.00
................................................................................a........................
1 CHANGE 1 PLAN I I I DESIGN 1 UNFORSEEN 1 CHANGES
1 ORDER 1 CHANGE 1 ITEM 1 DISTRICTS 1 CONFLICTS/ 1 SITE 1 FOR FUTURE 1
1 N0. 1 NO. I I REQUEST 1 OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS 1 PROJECTS
I I
1 12 1 29 1 Sever Manhole Modifications I I 1 $4,098.00 1
I I
12 1 71 1 Intake Screens For Fans 1 $4,369.00 1
12 1 9090 1 Resolution of veldinq Problem 1 $60,000.00 1
I
I I 1 I
13 1 26 1 Bulkhead 84' Interplant Pipe 1 $55,645.00 1
1 13 1 64 1 16' PM I 1 $28,033.00 1
I 1
1 13 1 9089 I Rothrock 54' Obstruction I 1 S18,519.00 1
I
14 1 73 1 Lighting Panel Conduit Routing i i $822.00 1
14 1 74 1 Raised Floor 1 $29,154.00
14 1 75 1 Plumbing 4 Air Conditioners i 1670.00 1
14 1 83 1 Rothrock Run Signals t $3,374.00
I
I 14 1 85 1 HVAC Control Wiring I i $7,458.00 1
15.01 , 90 1 Replan Circuit Transformers i $4,774.00 1
15.02 1 BOA 1 Handrail at 42-inch Bypass $602.00 1
1 16.01 1 40, 40A 1 Accommodations for Handicapped $8,915.00
408 1 Persons
1 16.02 1 Install Platform Closure 3534.00
1 16.02 1 78 1 Utility Room Piping i i 1968.00 1
1 16.04 1 BO Miscellaneous Modifications to $12,364.00
1 Nalkvays ans Ladders ,
1 16.05 1 87 1 Handrail at Termination Channel $2,014.00 1
1 16.06 36 1 Modify Roof Slope 12,021.00
16,07 1 97A 1 Install Grounding for Computer $3,318.00
1 and Replace Current Breakers for
1 Sump Pumps ,
PAGE 4
(3•Jun-89
CGDOC
J-15
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT ❑8,476.243.00
uunn nuu.....cams....cams....uu.uu..uv..a a....aa...........................................................
I CHANGE 1 PLAN I DESIGN 1 UNFORSEEN 1 CHANGES
I ORDER I CHANGE I ITEM 1 DISTRICTS 1 CONFLICTS/ 1 SITE 1 FOR FUTURE 1
1 NO. I NO. 1 1 REDDEST I OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS 1 PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I
I
1 16.08 1 ES-I 1 Clear Unknown Underground I 1 1 54,093.00 1
AB-1 1 Obstructions
I i I
1 16.09 1 04 1 Install Air Dryer 1 1 $1,663.00 I
l l
I I6.10 1 89 1 install Acoustical Paneling I I 1 1 1449.00 1
I
1 16.11 1 90 I Revise Grating Fasteners 1 $321.00 I
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 TOTAL 1 196,623.64 1 $120,111.72 1 6138,955.95 1 1161,509.40
1 PERCENT OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT 0.52E 0.691 1 1.08E 1 0.871
......................u:aa.r..a.....z_______________________z_-a_e-___z_-_:_..........umr.X.zz..........:......
::..:
PAGE 5
13-Cun-B9
CSDOC
PI-25, PI-26, P2.32, P2-33, P2-34
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $15,893,393.00
1 CHANGE I FCC/ DES:GN 1 UNFORSEEN CHANGES
ORDER 1 PLAN ITEM 1 DISTRICT CONFLICTS/ 1 SITE 779 FUTURE
I NO. I CHANGE REQUEST 1 OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS PRCCECTS
1___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
JOB 40. PI-25, PI-26
_____________________
i.01 FCO 17 I ADB'L EXPLORATORY POTHOLING 1 S2,S24.92
1.02 I CREDIT FOR ➢ELE72N OF
EXTERIOR FIELD MELDING (45,000.00) I
3.01 1 INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL
1 UNDERGROUND FOUL AIR LINER 575.626.OV
3.1_ OVEREXCAVATION 3F SLBCRADE
AT SCRUBBER COMPLEX si.;B5,S9
2.?3 1 RELOCATE 6-INCH PLANT RATER i
I LINE AT BASIN NO. 3
3.Jc 1 REROUTE UTILIT:ES AT
SCRUBBER COMPLEX b0:,007.3-
STRAINERS ; -._
• 13•Jun-89
CSDGC
PI-25, PI.26, P2.32, P2.33, P2-34
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $1.-,893,393.00
CHANGE 1 FCO/ 1 i DESIGN 1 UNFORSEEN CHANGES
ORDER 1 PLAN 1 ITEM DISTRICT CONFLICTS/ SITE 1 FCR FUTURE
1 NO. 1 CHANGE 1 1 REQUEST i OMISSIONS CONCPTONS , FRC;EC'S
1----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12.01 ' 1 EXTENSION OF FOUL AIR
1 INTAKE PLENUM i
1 14.01 1 PLANT NO. I SCRUBBER COMPLEX 1 $866.21
DRAIN CHANGES
;4.0U 1 PROVIDE CONCRETE PAD AT PLANT
4. 1, POWER BUILDING 4 DIESEL
1A14 F51. BOXES
JOB NO. P2-32, P2-33, P2-34
----------------------------
FCO A; RSCOVAL OF UNSuiTABLE
1 SUBGRADE MATERIAL
'JA c 9X'I STRUCT. CRACKS-BASIN 'S'
ALTERNATE COVER DESIGN FOR t
,.,:;VS "A" '8" AND s5C,00(.'.0i
:,OS FCO A7 ,- . EXPLORATGSY PCTHCL:NO
.........._ _
.:•=.dY E`F:UENi COL.ZC?i CH .,.. ....
+f?M
_ -:-UENi
' ,3-Jun-89
CSDOC
P1-25, P1-26, P2-32, P2-S3, P2-34
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $15,293,393.00
______________________________________________________________
1 CHANGE 1 FCO/ 1 DESIGN I UNFORSEEN 1 CHANGES
1 ORDER 1 PLAN 1 ITEM DISTRICT 1 CONFLICTS/ SITE 1 FOR FUTURE
NO. 1 CHANGE 1 REQUEST 1 OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS 1 PROJECTS
.--____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.05 1 REALIGNMENT OF NEW CITY i ,
1 WATER SYSTEM i
i 3.06 1 1 RELOCATE NATURAL GAS LINE AT
PFLANZ HEADWORKS i i $3,046.03 1 -
1 3.07 REALIGNMENT OF SCRUBBER DRAIN 1 !
6 PUMP STATION OVERFLOW DRAIN
3.nG MOD'S :C NEW ?NF!UEH? STRL'C?.
3.0E REMOVAL OF CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 1 .,-......
4.'J2 DELETION OF SCRUBBER
1 REC;nCU.AiiON,S'i S?EM STRAINERS ($31,047.81i
4.03 1 PUMP-DOWN FOR INSPECTION
:F EQUIPMENT $3,848.:
:..4 1 SEALING OF JUNCTION BOXES
_N S.ARi OF FEANZ
PROVIDE SU?PORTS FOR LIQUID
FOUL APR
DRAIN SUMPS AND !EANOUIS
'OD:_Y EI iS?ZNG °i_ -
'EAD'WORKS EFFL. '_AUNDER CHNLi
�ZVAL :F EXISTING CD.`:YnEE
OVERPOUR AT PFLANZ HEAD'FORKS
PLUSH AND CLEAN PFLANZ
KEAD'AORKS W[TAE;_ AF:ES -_.-
13-Tun-89
CSDOC
PI-25, PI-26, P2-32, P2-33, P2-34
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT 115,393,393.00
--------------
1 CHANGE FCO/ DESIGN UNFORSEEN CHANGEE
1 ORDER PLAN ITEM 1 DISTRICT 1 CONFLICTS/ SITE Fi3 FUTURE
NO. CHANGE 1 REQUEST , OMISSIONS 1 CONDITIONS PRC:2:7:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.06 1 REPLACEMENT OF 36-INCH RCP
1 INFLUENT LINE TO PRIMARY $42,294.52
1 SEDIMENTATION BASIN 'E"
5.07 1 REMOVE 6-INCH SEVER VENT- i
WEST SIDE PFLAN2 HEADWORRS e„TB7.5E
5.08 1 DKETION OF UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
I NEW BILLINGS TUNNEL EXTENSION ($8,83m0) 1
S.05 PROVIDE PANIC TYPE DOOR HARD- I
1 WARE FOR BASIN COVERS i36,LC5.5
6.06 ADDITIONAL CHLORINE SOLUTION
I P:PING AT PLANT NO. 2
" LOBIRIZATION STAT:31
"AY WAT2fi HEADERS 1 ,
,,. . .7:NG AT PLANT NO. 2 $E,SC2.=5
..,. _:: SARF.:ERS A"
73-Jun-D9
CSDOC
P1-25, PI-26, P2-32, P2-33, P2-34
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT 515,G9"u.00
CHANGE ; FCOY 1 DESIGN GBFDRSEEk CHANGES
1 ORDER I PLAN ITEM 1 DISTRICT CCNF ;CTSY 6LTE FOR %:WE :
NO. CHANGE REQUEST C.".:SS:ifiS . ..i..:;3N5 Pr;ECTS
:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________..
6.14 I 1 3E-ROUTE EXISTING SITE .
UTILITIES AT 109-INCH PRIMARY : 614,144.52 I
I EFFLUENT L1:E
6.I5 RE-ROUTE EZ:S7:NS
STARTING AIR LINE AT : ..._.
PF:ANZ HEADNOSKS
S.:6 `ASONRY BULKHEAD AT ABANDONED 1
. .._::E SATE OPEN:,2. PF:ANZ
�5:SD3ZE
SLIDE SATES FCP "u:STRIBC'7ION
?DIES : IS, .:....
KMGVE A REPLACE SEDIMENTATION
6;2;N `F' 4 'C :;All LINE e.....T....
_ - .._.....
_. ._ ACC__ Sl _ _-;UC'...i5: , ACDl
_A-_- . _... A P'.AN7 NG.
i3-Jun-89
CSDOC
P1-25, Pl-26, P2-32, P2-33, P2-34
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $15,893,393.00
CHANGE FCO/ 1 DESIGN UNFORSEEN 1 CHANSES
ORDER 1 PLAN ITEM 1 DISTRICT CONFLICTS/ 1 SITE I FOR FUTURE
NO. i CHANGE I REDUEST OMISSIONS 1 COND:T:eNS PROJE.7S
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
,.�. 1 MODIFICATIONS TO SEAL WATER 1
1 SYSTEM-SCRUBBER REC:RCULAT:ON I „-::,:C
AND ACID PUMPS i -
10DIFICAT:ONS - SOUTH
I SCRUBBER COMPLEX DRAIN i 14,824.0'
PUMP STATION
'CAT INTERIOR OF NORTH AND
3%7� 3CBU;?ER COMPLEX DRAIN 1
:ONCRETE STAIR LANDiNS-
B:LL:NGS TUNNEL
... _. .... _. _ .. i.J.)L
' 13-Tun-A9
CSDOC
PI-25, PI.26, P2.32, P2-33, P2-34
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
ORIGINAL CONTRACT $15,893,393.00
CHANGE 1 FCC/ _DESIGN. - JN;
4'-RcEE .RANGES
ORDER PLAN ITEM DISTRICT CONFLICTS/ 5D11E -OS POTURE
NO. CHANGE 1 REQUEST OMISSIONS CONDITi3PS PROJECT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13.0: ADDED CAUSTIC PUMP CIRCUITS 1555,GBL::
'SAY :N START OF "A" AND "I" f22,i:U.L
SCRUBBER MODIFICATIONS
:3.03 STEAM SHUNT PIPING CHANGES 513,839.99
:3.04 1 ADDED AEFAALi:C :CNCAETE CURE 1 $6,834.74
AND TRENCH PAWING
1CCIF:CATI04S TO POLL A:R ....:
DUCTWORK AT HEADA'ORKS "C'
14.04 METRANE SENSORS FOR C:PC'ULAR
PRi PAPY CLAP.:F:E9G
. ........................................._.._......_.___..-___..__.__.................................................
OF ORIGINAL ZONTRACC
........................................................................................................................
R€; AGENDA ITEM NO, 17(b) (2)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
0 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1 p99A EL45 AVENUE
June 28, 1989 FO.Box 8127
REF #99102 3 .RP FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92720-8127
91A1982.2411
STAFF REPORT
INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE REVISIONS
INTRODUCTION
The Districts' staff and legal counsel are proposing revisions to
the uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance for each District to
incorporate recent requirements of the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) , to clarify certain provisions, and to simplify and
streamline the administrative and enforcement procedures. The
Ordinance regulates all industrial and commercial dischargers in
the Districts' service area through its permitting and
enforcement provisions.
This report provides background information, summarizes the
proposed changes, and presents a schedule for reviewing and
adopting amendments to the Ordinance.
HISTORY OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE REGULATIONS
Recognizing the need to control the quantity and quality of
wastewater discharged to the Districts' sewerage system, the
Boards of Directors adopted the first Ordinance regulating the
use of the system in February, 1954. This Ordinance was amended
in February 1958, and again in April, 1970.
The 1970 version formally established the Districts' Industrial
Waste Division for the purpose of issuing permits, setting flow
and quality limits, and monitoring industrial discharges to the
sewerage system. Effective July 1, 1976, the Ordinance was
expanded to include heavy metal discharge limits.
On July 1, 1983 , the Ordinance was again amended to include
enfprcement of the EPA's new categorical limits and to modify the
cadmium, copper, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides, and total
toxic organic discharge limits.
�./ 1
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED REVISIONS
`i
The staff and legal counsel have drafted revisions to the 1983
Ordinance to clarify certain provisions, to simplify and
streamline the administrative and enforcement procedures, to
incorporate the EPA regulations that have been promulgated since
1983, and to incorporate changes and additions to the Ordinance
recommended in a routine audit by the EPA, State Water Resources
Control Board, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The proposed amendments to the 1983 Ordinance fall into five
categories:
1. Additions and changes to definitions to help users
interpret the ordinance.
2. Incorporation of other EPA recommendations to strengthen
the Districts' authority over conditions of discharge and
utilization of enforcement compliance schedules.
3. Incorporation of a waste minimization program.
4. Addition of Probation Order, Regulatory Compliance Schedule
Agreement, and Permit Suspension provisions to provide both
flexibility and strength to enforcement actions.
5. Modified appeal procedures:
a. Instead of being heard by an individual District Board,
the appeal hearings will now be by the Executive
Committee. This change recognizes that industrial
discharges impact the Joint Treatment Works, thus all
Districts should have a voice in the outcome of
appeals.
b. Provide for right of appeal and hearing of staff's
decision on Permit Suspension and Permit Revocation by
the Executive Committee. Appeals of any other staff
decisions will be considered by the Executive Committee
and the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, decide
whether to grant or deny the request for a hearing.
REVIEW PROCEDURES
The procedures followed to amend the Ordinance begin with staff
and legal counsel reviewing the existing Ordinance and drafting
the proposed revisions. The proposed changes are then reviewed
with representatives of the industrial community and the
regulatory agencies for their input. After comments have been
received, the proposed amended Ordinance is presented to the
2 `�
Executive Committee and then to the Joint Boards of Directors for
consideration.
During September and October 1988, the Districts' staff requested
input from the Industrial Waste Ad Hoc Committee and in November
1988 requested EPA to provide a preliminary review of the draft
Ordinance. More recently, a notice was sent to all Class I
permittees (approximately 450) announcing that a meeting would be
held on May 17, 1989 to review the changes made in response to:
1. Changes requested by the Executive Committee.
2. Recent changes in the Federal Pretreatment Program
regulations.
3. EPA preliminary review of the draft Ordinance.
4. Comments received from the Ad Hoc Committee.
Comments and questions received by Districts' staff from the
industrial community helped to clarify the provisions of the
Ordinance.
Other than the objection to the HOD limitation by Beatrice/Hunt-
Wesson, the major objection posed by the industrial community to
the proposed Ordinance revisions is that in the original draft a
permittee did not have the right to appeal all staff decisions to
the Directors. This recommended change to the appeal procedures
was presented by staff and General Counsel to the Executive
Committee as summarized in the attached memorandum from Mr.
Woodruff. The intent of the proposed appeal procedures was to
expedite the decision-making process to resolve routine or
relatively minor permit and enforcement matters quickly and at
the staff level, yet retain appeal rights and final determination
on the important matters of permit suspension or revocation with
the Directors. Except for the staff decision to suspend or
revoke a permit (which prohibits any discharge to the sewer) , the
original draft Ordinance proposed that all other matters would be
resolved at staff level by appeal to the General Manager.
However, the original draft Ordinance has been revised by the
Executive Committee and now provides:
o An industrial waste permittee can appeal any final
action of the staff.
o. . All appeals will be considered and/or heard by the
Executive Committee.
o Appeals of permit suspension or revocation will be
granted a hearing by the Executive Committee.
�� 3
o Appeals of any other final staff decisions will be
considered by the Executive Committee and the
Committee, in its sole discretion, shall decide whether
to grant or deny the request for a hearing.
The permittee's recourse of any final District decision is to the
courts.
SCHEDULE FOR AMENDING ORDINANCE
The proposed schedule for revising the uniform Industrial Waste
Ordinance is shown below:
ACTION ITEM COMPLETION DATE
1. Staff update report to Executive June 28, 1989
Committee on proposed Ordinance
revisions. Modify as directed.
2. Receive EPA/RWQCB comments and modify July 1, 1989
Ordinance if necessary.
3. File Staff Report to Boards of July 12, 1989*
Directors and first reading of
revised Ordinance.
4. Districts' Board Meeting - second August 9, 1989*
reading and hearing on revised
ordinance.
5. Effective date of the Ordinance. September 8, 1989
* Readings may be delayed if the EPA comments are substantial or
are not received by July 1, 1989.
RVL:JW:lab
REF $991023.RP
4
�e
4.J
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
WEDNESDAY, JULY 12, 1989 - 7 : 30 P . M.
10 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31189 PAGE 1` -
3>L REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION OISTR tC TS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/O7/89 POSTING GATE 96107189
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
199988 ABC PAINT STRIPING SERVICE 5675.00 ASPHALT STRIPING
0999" AD AMSON UNIFORM t COUIF. f5B2.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES
> VR STRU RS. IN . $1.250.764.11 CUditWff IYO}TPI-26.P2-32.33.34
• 099091 AIR PRODUCTS t CHEMICAL INC. $13.069.60 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
099992 AIRGUARD INDUSTRIES. INC. f109.33 ELECTRIC PARTS
0999 ALLEN GMC TRUCKS t14.085.28 MN VEHICLH
199994 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. ft.181.55 MECHANICAL PARTS
099995 ANIXTER - WIRE S CABLE f124.24 INSTRUMENT PART
3> n A $1.9 8.08 IR CR PARTS
099997 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.072.79 NOTICES 6 ADS
F71 099990 AR RYE{ SERVICES. INC. s121.90 UNIFORM RENTALS
2 , 995999 SSOCIATEO CONCRETE PROD.. INC $85.86 BUILDING MATERIALS
C7 ]00000 ASSOC. PUBLIC SAFETY $125.00 INSTRITHENT SERVICE
n 10 D001 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING f1.404.50 SOIL TESTING
I'n IUUUOE �l'R�AVLOUNJ T GROUP All .7 CONVEYOR PARTS
--I ' 100003 AVIS CAR LEASING 918.762.00 MN VEHICLES
-M '+.� 1000D4 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 546.869.39 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88
ASSOC.9 W. 5AROTTI AND r 0• 0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-25626,P232,33.34.37
100906 BANTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS t3r312.37 LAB SUPPLIES
100307 BENZ ENGINEERING• INC. S316.73 ColEBESSOR PARTS
Lv 1 8 3 CASCADE FF ICE PRODUCTS $715.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1 100009 BON-A-RUES $86.20 TRUCK PARTS
100010 BROOKS PRODUCTS S8r130.00 VAULTS
n 1 0 II BROWN t L Y ON ULTING f79r092.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-37,J-23-1
r 100012 BU RNE ENGINEERING CO. 1205:70 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
100013 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. S44D.00 LAND BOOMING
17
n 309014 GARY 6. STREEO f575.52 PCIn CASH REIMBURSEMENT
103025 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $172.76 PAPER
6* 100016 C { R RECONOITIONING CO. 5350.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
A I IODO17 CS COMPANY 58.702.51 VALVE
100018 CS1-CILTRBL SIr172.08 MECHANICAL PARTS
fl 100019 CAL-CHEN SALES 5148.40 SAFETY SUPPLIES
-I oT 020 JON 1 RICE• MD $
4.59D.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - OCEAN MONITORING
�+. 100021 CAROLLO-B OVLErA JOINT VENTURE .29 r 864.76 EHGINUKING SERVICES US 87-131
w� 100022 CE POWER { EQUIPMENT 9593.11 TRUCK WARTS
0 23 ASNTU Y T INST, 6 SUPF. $2.329.03- SAFETY SUPPLIES
�•'� 100924 CHEMYEST INDUSTRIES. INC. 566.30T.03 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-09-98
.LN 100025 CHEVRON U.S.A.• INC. 53.143.39 OIL 6 GREASE
« 200026 CHLORINATORS 9 CONTROLS. INC. s774.18 CHLORINATION PARTS
100027 DALE CHRISTIAN STRUC. ENGR. f1.200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20
.s� 100028 CHRISTEVE CORP. 5166 0B6.00 CONSTRUCTION 3-31
I00 9 CORINNE CLAWSON $32.02 MEETING MUSE
100130 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF f4.945.50 MECHANICAL PARTS
100031 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. $174.12 TRUCK PARTS
« 100032 CONSOLIDATED ELECTR AL DIST. $6,194.45 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
�«qq 100033 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS A22.583.65 SLUMMING
�aJ
IW
ri v
a e>t
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
1 COUNTY SANITATION Dl TR IC OF O RANGECOUNTY
TJ CLAIMS PAID 06/0)/89 FOSTIN6 DATE 06/07/89
+ WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
• 100034 CONTROL CABLES* INC. $57.46 CABLE
100935 CONTROL DATA CORPORATION $370.58 FIELD SERVICES
100036 CONTROLCO $97.40• ELECTRIC PARTS
100037 CORE-INTERNATIONAL S1,222.00 COMPUTER PARTS
3 A EIL
300040 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 52$129.50 ELECIRIC EQUIPMENT
100000 CAL WATER
CUR f 129.50 SL REMOVAL M
4 LAR U0. f SLUDGE
Y _I 10004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $480.00 SEE PROCESSING FEE
100043 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $154.5 HAZARDOUS WAST TAX
ITT 44 ARENTALA $3397 Z I0004 DECO f371.0 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
n 10046 OEIURIK AMA/OR IS CO. . 4 79 VALVE PARTS
100047 F PPO A $2,119 PRINTING
10000E DORAOO ENTERPRISES. INC, i25$129.79 PLANT GAINTENANCH 6 R�AIHS
100050 O-VALS SALES CO. $371.84 FITTINGS
I71 190051 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS*MENTS INC. 7 .e XLECUOHICS
3 _ 100052 EASTMAN.EB INC. 83,037.44 CONK¢CONSTRUCTION
SUPPLIES
110053 Y. M. BERT CORP. $343,435.50 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3
�+ 190053 V.N. EBERT CORP. iJ03 800.5
O 100055 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY .200.00 OCPRESENTATION AIDS
100055 ENCHANTER* INC. s9*260.00 OCEAN SERVICES
tl.0.6-(0-e]
10005E ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. f
n 100058 FAT SAND AND GRAVEL. INC. $234.83 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
10005E JAMES FALCONER f2.300.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
CONSTRUCTION SERVIC - SCATINO
100060 JOHNFARR B. ES AESERVIC P.F. S3 50 .
100060 FARE SALES A SERVICE f748.79 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
100061 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $155.75 AM FREIGHT
In ( 200062 FERRELLOAS $29.25 PROPANE
A 100063 FISCHER A PORTER CO. 619,022.77 CHLORINATION PARTS
300064 FLO-SYSTEMS S608.84 ELECTRIC PARTS
t'l 100065 GELBER PUMPS INC, f P 4 P ART
100066 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $511.35 PAINT SUPPLIES
(n 100067 FOUNTAIN VALLEY READY MIX $1,613.65 CONCRETE:
100066 DONALD L, FOX 0 ASSOCIATES CONSULTING
100069 THE FOXBORO CO. S2*214.61 IMMODEST SUPPLIES
300070 FROST ENGINEERING SERVICES CO. $132.18 VAVLES
DO 071 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $ 3 BUILDING MATERIALS
300072 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION $109.166.38 CONSTRUCTION J-15A
300073 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 31.764.54 MLEPHONE
100074 GIERLICM M TCHELL INC. $14.353.96 PUMP
100075 DON GREEN S ASSOCIATES $13.910.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES US 88-72
100076 HALPRIN SUP PLT CO. 1206.70 OIYDER SUPPLIES
10DO 77 HAABOUA ENGINEERING f3.310.73 PD1@ PARTS
wl 190BID MATCH R KIRK♦ INC. f4.]35.71 MECHANICAL PARTS
Mx' 199079 S. A. MEALY CO. 190.000.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-31-I
I�
a
N �_—
_ M
C .40 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE '
REPORT NUMBER AP.3 F�
COUNTY SANITATION DISTR ICT3 OF ORANGE COUNTY
W CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING GATE 06/01/89
ICI WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION _
100080 DAVID HEINZ 546.00 MEETING EXPENSE
• 100081 E.G. HELLER.S SON. INC. $97.30 TOOLS
•I100082 HILTI. INC. f 8.1 HARDWARE
100083 HOERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. • INC. $1,256.48 MECHANICAL Pun
100084 HORIZON HIGH-REACH f187.86 TRUCE PARTS
�a�ODlIbS HOUSE OF BATTERIES $289.69 BATTERIES
1000 B6 R.S. HUGH ES CO INC. $2,478.24 HARINHURE
1000 BT 1" "LAVAL INC. f366.111 ELECTRIC S
D . al• 16.74 GEARS 6 CHAIN
Ca"1 100089 INGRAM PAPER $2.104.29 PAPER
ITI 100090 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. f217.76 TRUCE PARTS _
Z 'ry C 1 INTERNATIONAL TIME RECORDER $89.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
n alb 100092 JACK M CHANGE f211.47 TRUCE REPAIRS
100093 RIVIERA FINANCE $1.149.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
6• 100094 JEN EN TOOLS S ALLOTS fl•346.20 TOOLS
fiml 100095 KAMAN BEARINGS $ SUPPLY 5471.30 FITTINGS
300096 KAMER COMPANY $1.670.bS TOOLS
T KAY-RAY. INC. f1.457.27 ELECTRONIC PARTS
4k I 100098 THE KEITH COMPANIES 32.765.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33636
~O 10.099 KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. $1.106.004.05 C -
100100 KING BE ANIN G• 'NC;
fA]78.63 HECKARCIAL PARTS
I 102101 KIRST PUMP S MACHINE WORKS fl•281.01 FUND, PARTS
J 100202 MARTIN KORDICK. SR $3.055.80 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-31.S-29 3-34-1
200193 LEE $ RO CONSULTING ENGR. $87,031.00 CONSULTING SERVICES PI-33
r. •�I 100104 LIMITOROUE CORP. 65.397.35 INSTRUMENT
Iaq 100105 Has f50.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS
6 $2T6.50 PROTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
10010I NALCOLM PIRMIE • INC. $18,799.41 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 86-146
Cn i„i 100108 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $46.71 INSTRUMENT ARPPITRR
p I0p109 MATT CHLOR• INC. $1.296.09 CHLORINATION PARTS
II�^� 300130 MCMENNA ENGR. S EQUIP. $16,901.23 PINS PARTS
O1 100111 MC KINNEY ELECTRONICS $69.95 GATE PARTS
—CG61T - KI.gnE IATES, INC. f90.00 LAB SERVICES
100It3 MEDLIN CONROLS CO. 3291.44 GAUGE
'TA 100114 THOMAS MENDEZ $626.79 1 TART?TV CTAIN
100115 MICROAGE COMPUTER $6.419.16 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 6 KARD M
f•� 100216 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. f2.889.09 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
100217 "LADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO $350.306.36 rnNO3H1TCTTDx 3-7RR-1
loolla MONTGOMEKY LABORATORIES $1.420.00 LAB SERVICES
1i 100119 MOORE S TAHER $5,383.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES DIST 2
•M 100120 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $160.31 E7TTTNGR
100121 NEWPORT BUSINESS INTERIORS $1.015.88 PANELING
100"1 NOR
TH
SUPPLY $778.93 INSTRUMENT PART
100123 OCEAN SALT CO.. INC. $333,26 MALT
100129 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. $36.455.75 CHLORINE H.0.10-12-88
100325 ONE DAY PAINT S BODY f230.16 TRUCE REPAIR
N�
p�
D
w �
t FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE R
-I y REPORT NUMBER AP'03
-Cr _ COON Y AN A 0 I T I A COUNTY _
(T CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/C7/89
• WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
300126 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY f275.07 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
• 1001267 ORANGE COAST JEEP S12.SB 8.20 _NEW VEMIC.R
100120 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $102.29 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
100129 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. S73.63 PESTICIDE
VALVE
100131 COUNTY OF ORANGE f339 iS0.a8 DISPOSAL CATS PEES
100132 COUNTY OF ORAN 6E 52.479.25 PERMIT FEES
•• 100133 A08ERT L, CITRON pONSTRUC IONP -EPOS*T mesv
a 100135 PACIFIC ELECTRIC. INC. $58" 1.49 CONSTRUCTION J-13
M . 100136 PACIFIC ELECTRIC f301111 S7 CON9TEUCTION ]-IS
2 PACIFICSAFETY00137 PACIFIC BELL $42386.53 TELEPHONE
D 100139 PHOTO ICKW S SOUND CO. f8$236.00 COMPUTER ¢QUIPMBNT 6 SUPPLIES
100139 PICKY CN PIP R s238.0 PAPER
nl /0 PIMA ORO SYS TENS. INC. 4AA9964.55 SLUDGE RPNUVAL M.0.3-11-88 '
m' 100141 POLYPUIC. [NC. 113r 937.66 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-8-89
3 100142 PO YEN ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. Se .12
100143 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S132.00 ICE
it I 100199 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. 599900.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88
100145 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. f2 308.68
cn
146 QUEST INTL. MONITOR S RVTC 3735.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
I.•� 1001v7 PATTRAY AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $8,650.00 RAPPING SERVICES
• 100198 _ RED PING SX OES $123.77 cevgy 9xnnc
f" •. 100199 R.A. REED ELECTRIC S19533.90 ELECTRIC METER
11 E 1111 THE REGISTER f1.9B6.9' NOTICES 6 ADS
1 OC 151 REMEOT TEMP E26
p •�� 300152 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. f66.62 HARDWARE
.1 100153 RICOH CORPORATION S69.37 COPIER LEASES
cn 100154 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. 31,140.98 InR snvvrans
100155 ROCCO•$ TRUCK WRECKING S12T.20 TRUCE PARTS
ti >• 100157 ROE EMONT ANALYTICAL S512.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
109157 ROSEMO NT UNILOC S762.30 90.
N 100159 R YAL WHOLESALE CLE CTR IC $1$562.35 FREIGHT
PARTS
»I 100160 RYAN-HERCORCO SB62.35 PB¢ICNT
200 60 JOSEPX T. AY R R 3INC. S704.22
1' 100162 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 5199.20 PARTS CLEANER
.1' 100163 SANTAN ENGINEERING . INC. lb r900.00 SANDBLASTING
4 100263 SANTA AN4 DIXONF. RIC ASSOCIATES
512B.62 M"NEER NG SERVICES
100165 SCIENCER IKON ASSOCIATE$ f69T30.62 ENGINEERING RING H.O M.0.11-09-88
IOC166 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L 3215.031.90 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.8-10-BB
I OCI66 SE0. COAST DE516N3 f328.60
•� 100167 S AR$. flO EBUCK S CO. $126.72 LAB SUPPLIES
L IIC160 SEARS. ROEBUCK A CO. S42.91 LAB SUPPLIES
100169 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S1.530.5B RAPPTY SBPVn P9
1110170 SIERRA COPY S993B6.59 PRINTING
�••' 100171 SKYPARM WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 171.00 PIITSIDAL RANKS
A
� I
_ 4
C_ C
NO 9299 JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5131/89 PAGE
3?L ` REPORT NUMBER AP431
COUNTY SANITATION DISTR IETS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0,1977" POSTING DATE 06/07/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
100172 SLIDE MAKERS WEST $455.86 PRESENTATION AIDS
100173 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS 5212.00 SOIL 'TESTING
100174 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $8,306.85 pOWER
•� 100175 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $9.000.67 ➢IESEL FUEL.
100176 SPEC TECH WE TERN f750.04
I11 00 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS, INC. _ 3z.i.50 VALVE
100178 Sp
EECO S1r643.58 SCALE MAINTENANCE
100379 STAR TOOL & SUPPLY CO. f1.030.61 TMLS
Y 199290 STERLING ART 5236.70 GRAPHIC ART SERVICES
m 100101 SUBIA. INC. $795.00 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
ITT 'e 280182 SUPER DHEM CO RP $
Z ;el 10U183 THE BUPPCIE FS 33,686.80 HARDWARE
C IOD189 TCN ASSOCIATES S1 rR49.80 LAB SUPPLIES
n 1OC185 TAYLORw UNN 139.92 ELECTUC CA
10 386 T TRAIN $114.60 FILM RENTALS - ELECTRICAL SAFETY
f l of 100187 THOMAS TE XPORARIES f2r J9l.l9 TO0'OMRY SERVICES ,
3 100188 TOWNE ADVERTISERS ......
9 MAILING SERVICES H.O.4-27-89
110189 TRAVEL TRAVEL $336.50 TRAVEL SERVICES
M' 1101.0 H.O. TR ER ICE CO. 3401.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
I--' 100191 T.S. TRIPP SI,aqq.oO
290192 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY• INC. 363.21 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
100193 J.G. INCKER & SUN• INC. 31.090.13 ANALYZER PARTS
100194 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTER.INC. 533 T.04
00195 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $127.30 PARCEL SERVICES
100196 URBAN ALTERNATIVES $15,920.00 CONSULTING SERVICES US 89-44
r 100197 IN SCIENTIFIC EN TIFIC it 514.60 '
ty 100198 SUPPLY CO. f6.9SS.59 FITTINGS/VALVES
100199 VAREC DIVISION $43.45 FREIGHT
100200 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP fl 169.50
10020i VI KING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY f19197.67 SAFETY SUPPLIES
110202 V7STA PAINT C00.P. s82.36 PAINT SUPPLIES
n 100203 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. INC. SI 485.25
--1 100204 WELLS FARGO AND SERVICE $2,308.06 GUARD SERVICES
Cn I 100205 WESTpi IS CAPE ON INC. $838.46 CHEMICALS
100206 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY 413,026.09 CADSTTn mnA H_2 A-�n_RR
1002D7 JOHN WILEY & SONS. INC. $25.70 PUBLICATION
,•'� 100208 WiLLOAN ASSOCIATES $242.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-1
.d 100209 ROURKE & WOODRUFF f1.416i3.3]5.25 30
IOU210 XEROX CORP. COPIER LEASES
100211 GEORGE YAROLEY ASSOCIATES $151.45 HARDWARE
1 OC212 RICMAND YOUNG PROD. $314.06 OFFICE SUTPLTu
100213 ZILBARTH AND ALPER 5242- _460.90 CONSTRUCTION P2-32
____
TOTAL CLAIMS FAID 06/07/89 $5.682,572.47
I�
= 'W
Ip:
1 �w�
lli 1�
FIND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/31/89 PACE 6
D REPORT HUNBER AP43
1 �" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
(T
i
SUMINRT AMOUNT -
rl02 MO POND f 4.300.06
02 F/R POND 622.717.27
a —i9 OP
/3 ACO FUND 1:6.392.31
i5 OPER FUND 3.267.34
CY) ,y 06 AGO PUNY, 3.421.78
m 07 OPER FUND 3,136.95
2 4,833.29
tv I11 OPER FUND 54.56
D 013 OPER POND 480.00
..� /566 OPER PUNY, 320.76
3 0566 AGO FUND 699.781.LO
4.900.82
17614 OPER FUND 3.123.81UND N JT OPER F 602.029.90
C7 CORE 3.z....53D...
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 626.79
JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 126.669.14
r i 5,682,572.47
r
v
--1
a
Cn w
<n
ih
w
.d
i°q�9ry
IW
D w
1`
� 1`
( NO SISS JT DIST VORNINN CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/B9 FACE -
wE: REPORT NUMBER AP43
1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
F-= CLAIMS PAID 06/21/81 POSTING DATE 06/21/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
101131 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $123.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34-1
1OC ,24 AARON BROTHERS AP -ARTS S197.2h ENGINEERING PBESENTAT30R AIDS
100241 LINCOLN CARPETS f INTERIORS f2B4.00 CARPET CLEARING
100242 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. 51.585.06 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
100243 LEASING ASSVCIATES/ALLSTA7E s
0244 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $47.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
1OR245 AMERICAN CHAIN A GEAR CO. $459.45 CHAIN 6 GEARS
101296 AMERITECH f O
n 00247 HE ANCHOR PACKING CO. f11d15.63 BABDWARe/16CBANLC61 SUPPLIES
100248 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 13.217.53 EMPLOYMENT NOTICES 6 ADS
TTl 100249 ARATEX SERVIC ESr 1NC. 34.671.97
ME 0 P S I S EN6 NEERIN6 3240.06 SOIL TESTING
C7 10C2FI AUDIO VIDEO REPORTING SERVICE f88.89 VIDEOS
n 309252 AUTO SPOP EQUIPMENT CO. sll 9 AUTOMOTIVE
100253 AL N DISPOSAL SERVICE S87r846.63 GRIT REMOVAL H.O.7-13-88
f 1100254 BANANA BLUE PRINT $1.198.61 BLUEMRJITING
3 0 55 BANK OF AMERICA NT{ A 22.576.23 VISA CARDS, MEETING SEEMS"
30P256 P.V. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. $4.860.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-25,26.PI-32,33.37
4t 60257 BARR DOOR OF SO.URANGE CTY.INC 51.314r53 DOOR REPAIRS
�-' F-11
00256 !. BATE MAN f575.00 DZERM
00F59 BATTERIES WEST, INC. S62S•95 TROCR PARTS
300260 BAXTEP SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS. .2.072.37 LAB SUPPLIES
100261
R
r M262 ROBERT 9E1N.WILLIAII FROST A AS $4,600.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33.34
26S BLOCK 6 COMPANY. INC. $25.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES
300264 50 CA CAGE OFFICE PRODUCTS SI.2fi7.fifi OFFICE SUPPLIER
C7 100265 BOL SA RADIITOR SERVICE 230T.40 RADIATOR REPAIRS
I CV BON-A-RUES 5197.40 TRUCK PARTS
N I00267 R H N R f
m
A IOP2EP BROWN S CALDWELL 55.55C.00 TAB SEMVICPS
1 CO269 BROWN S CAL ON
ELL CONSULTING f61r 177.4] ENGIN¢¢BtNC SEMVICBS J-23-I
[l ICC270 PURME ENGINEERING 1432 1 BUSH CO. ELECTRIC
.NU ASS MR. f6 .97
SURVETINC SERVICES
100272 6ART G. STREED f1r653.97 PETIT CASE REIMBORS@�7T
...273 CS COMPANY $1 885.47 VALVES
10027q • 32.232.77 INSTRUMENT PARTS
LOC275 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION $442.30 TRAINING
SCC276 CAPITAL WESTWARD f96 J.8 MECANICAL SUPPLIES
f r1 6. ENCIRRSRING SERVICES J-19,P1-34-2
100270 MOT/CASTLE $5,514.19 LAB EQUIPMENT
100279 CENTEL CONPUNICATIORS SYSTEM S6 319.04 PHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
CHAMPION NC CO. 1817.10 FENCING
1OO281 CHEMWEST INOUSTRIFS. INC. 559.717.25 FERRIC CHLORIDE 11-09-88
1002E2 A.V. CHESTERTON • L.A. i5r 930.E8 PUMP PARTS
FI�i.LNL N . . .r INC. 1524.25 SAINT SUPPLIES
Ir�i 100284 CHRISTEVE CORP. 51.272.66 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS
W
FUND ND 9199 - JT LIST WORMING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/10/09 PAGE 2
l REPORT NUMBER AP43
N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
�e CLAIMS PA 06 21 89 POSTING ATE 06 21 89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCRIPTION
e 100285 CORINNE CLA YS ON $42.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
10C286 COAST INSUP AN ON
AGLNCY f2.32T.00 INSURANCE
0 .S. r 0. • f e 6.5E MECHANICAL PARTS
4 1OC288 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS CF CALIF $1,826.50 MECHANICAL PARTS
e 100209 COMPUSERVE $60.48 COMPUTER SERVICES
002 'a RUBBER A F $1,192. 0 RUBBER PRODUCTS
10G291 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. f2.094.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
1OC292 CONSOLIDATED FPEIGHTWAYS 991.34 FREIGHT CHARGES
1U0293 CONSOLIDAT D REPROGRAPHICS f5.785.70 BLUEPRINTING
GD-Y '• 1 00 294 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY f123.76 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR
ITT IOC295 COUNCIL ON EDUCATION $195.00 SEMINAR
Z i�100296 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 51.215e59 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES .
l7 leaf 1OC297 CAL WATER $204.50 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
n 1CO298 LARRY CURTI TRUCK L EGUIFMENT i20r320.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O. 6-13-89
ril--10 2J�N1 S�♦ SERVICE
S RVVI f1.J91.99 TIRES
�-L 100300 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS 5296.00 LAB SUPPLIES
m 100301 DE7URIK ANO/OP CS CO. 39 5.07 VALVE PARTS
3 100302 POLYMERS S3.J00.89 - ANIONIC FOEYMERS M.0.8-10-88
# 109E03 DICMSONS $941.28 HARDWARE
~O ICO184 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 5887.7E PRINTING
nl 100305 DORADO EN TERFRiSES. INC. 50.519eG6 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 MAITES
I 110306 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $9.651.19 PAINT SUPPLIES
100307 DUR-RED PRODUCTS S11R.07 BUILDING SUPPLIES
r10O3UP. ENS RESCURCES• INC. SIr263e99 CONSULTING SERVICES - REG. 6 LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
f • 100309 EASTMAN, INC. 3624.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES
106330 EB RMARD EO UIPPENT $
6 L AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS
p 1OV313 ECOANLLYSIS. IBC• S1r251.25 CONSULTING SERVICES - OCEAN MONITORING
100312 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY $273.48 PRESENTATION AIDS
CA OC 33 APD L. ELLI R ENGINEERIGNS SERVICES
w IC IIN ENAB E $80.00 PUBLICATION
10C315 FACTORY REPRESENTATIVE. INC. S686e95 INSTRUIU:NT PARTS
C) 100316 MARSPALL RAW"
S3P0.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTIRBUTION
y �+ 100317 IN ES L N R $1.100.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - SCAW PERMITS
100326 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3,185.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4.J-20
O 1 .AL [ AIR FREIGHT
1 0320 F 9EP GLASS STRUCTURAL ENGR. $2,891.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES
300322 FILTER SUPPLY CO. 51.783.57 FILTER
]DD 322 FISCHER C FOPTER CO. S7,673.38 CHLORINATION PARTS
100323 FLAT L VERTICAL CCNCPETE 9323.00 CONCRETE CUTTING
102324 FLO-SYSTEMS 51.976.87 PUMP PARTS
I OC 325 FOG DNAN EP. INC. $129.0 PERMIT REFUND
;y 10 6 F A VAL Y CAN ERA 3130.7E FILM
dd 100327 CITY OF FOU 6TAIN VALLEY 5296.75 PERMITS
••� 1OC328 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 52.347.31 PAINT SUPPLIES
•y109329 DONALDV & ASSOCIATES 31.825.06 SAFETY CONSULTING
Iwl 109330 FOKRORO CO. / HAS SYSTEMS $2,278.51 INSTRURONP
Iva
ICY
I
N �+
40 9199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6114/89 PAGE
W [� REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY 54NIT AT ION 01 PIC TS OF 0 ANG COUNTY
W CL AIM.B PAID 06/21/89 POSTING DATE 06/21/89
' a
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
I00331 FROST ENGINEERING SERVICES CO. 5131.78 VALVES
let! CITY OF FUL LE TON $132.71 WATER
G333 G.M.A.C. AND/OR $1Jr620.43 VEHICLE PARTS
100334 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. f5.854.Be TELEPHONES
00335 ON G K ASSOCIATES K9 ENGINEERING SERVICES US 88-72
100336 HAOCC INSTRUMENTS S1B3.63 GAUGE
108337 HANCY E ASSCC. 31.176.fiC MECNAHCIAL REPAIRS
u 100336 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $7,147.00 MECRANICAL REPAIRS
n O]S9 X L . HARDY. INC. $111.30 BUILDING MATERIALS
m 30034P FRED A. HARPER 91.450.00 DEFERRED CORK DISTRIBUTION
IT7 1C0341 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $874.47 PURE'
2 I'al 3 C342 HATCH S RIRK. INC. $518.53 ENGINE PARTS
C7 100343 MEVLETT-PACKAED S466.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
n I4 344 HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRIC $2.530.90 GENERATORS
0 ORa HIL111 INC. 5998.52 TOOL
-1 �° 100346 HOER 8IGER C.V.B. CALIF. . INC. S743.38 COMPEeSSOR PARTS
3 k' 100347 HOLTRACHEM VEST. INC. S10 549.78 CAUSTIC SODA
iC0348 DONALD 0. HONOMICHL $300.04 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
:Vh IO0249 HOUSE OF BATTERIES S1r495.05 BATTERIES
.Y 1OC]5] A.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. S5037.29 PAINT SUPPLIES
O m 140351 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $13.60 WATER USEAGB
�m 100
352 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $118.19 MEER STAMPS
100353 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHVINN CYCL $80.03 BIKE PARTS
YAR 100354 INDUSTFIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 41,693.37 FITTINGS
IMES INF ILCO DEG REMONT. INC. $224.64 FREIGHT
110356 INGRAM PAPER $1,229.60 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
Cy 0C357INLAND EMPIREEQUIPMENT CO. 51.IR2.90 RENTAL EQUIM"
100358 IN PLACE MA CH iNl N6 CO. S5.093.06 MACHINE SHAFT
.C1D 100359 IN TEE T7 ONAL BUSINE S MACHINE S5 .09 PRINTER SOPPLI¢S
1DU360 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $20.53 WATER USF.AGE
100361 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $583.75 WRITES
(-D 102362 JENSEN TOOLS S ALLOYS $120.24 TOOL
100363 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY S68.80 - ELECTRIC PARTS
Cn I» 100364 KAMAN BEARINGS 6 SUPPLY $667.79 FITTINGS
100365 MANER COMPANY $1,253.fift TOULS
100366 MAY-RAY. INC. S1017.44 INSTRUMENTS
1OC367 KEENAN SUPPLY $99.02 R¢PAIR KIT
11U 368 K�YST DEC VALVE 1.59]5.]fl VALVE
uI 1003fi9 MIMS OCM INC. S673r150.00 VOC CREDITS M.0.5-10-89
IAD37D KING BEARING, INC. 3843.71 HACHINE SUPPLIES
10CS71 DONALD E. KINNEY S815.00 DETERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
1P0372 FIRST PUMP E MACHINE. WORKS 32,742.02 P@@ PARTS
100371 EASTMAN KCOAK S57.19 LAB SUPPLIES
I C.P374 HA PT IN WORD ICE.CO;SP S8520J CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-29 5-31
•H _ L.P.W.S.. INC. S109.49 WELDING SUPPLIES
.el 100376 LASER SUPPLIES E SEPVICE S24].5B PRINT SUPPLIES
W
W ao
FUND NO 9199 - JT DISI WGF0ING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 PAGE 4
W [+ REPORT NUMBER AP43
1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OPANCE COUNTY
t CLAIMS PAID 06/2l/89 POSTING DATE C6/21/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
100377 LE ROY CRANCALL k ASSOC. $662.71 CONSULTING SERVICES
• 10037E LIEF E P.T CA A FRIERSON f 6 O.GO SEMINAR REGISMTION
100379 T RCVE CORP. $4,719.61 VALVE REPAIRS
10038E M.P. LINDSTROM. INC. $15,497.27 CONSULTING SERVICES - NASTER PLAN
1OP381 ME DATA SERVICE CORP. $84.8
• 104 MACONCO f149.80 SERVICE AGREEMMIT
.. I00383 MAGNUS MOBILITY SYSTEMS f336.34 TOOL
1003P.4 P4INTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. i2.o36.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
D ] 3!5 MALCOLM PIRNIE • INC. fl.B81.95 ENGINEERING SERVICES '
}} /00386 MAMVAC ELECTRONICS $142.73 INSTRUME SUPPLIES
TM NT TI 'N 10038) MATT CXLOP INC. S2 952.49
2 20036 CMENN NUR• k £CUTE• 55.459.12 PING PARTS
n IOC3tl9 MERCHANTS k MANUFACTURERS f600.P0ON PARTS
MEMBERSHIP DUES
100390 MIC POAGE [O MP UTER f943.90 SOFTWARE
I� 100391 MI DL ANO MFG. CORP. 5436.12 CHLORINATION PARTS
—1 I 1C0392 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $629.43 SAFETY SUPPLIES
3 IS 0393 MOORE f TABER f9 706.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES
4 • INC. 5217.9E BEARINGS
13E395 POTOROLAr INC. 123,084.98 PAGERS
F� 100396 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES $79.54 CELLULAR SERVICES
E� 100397 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1.117.83 FITTINGS
1 OJ 398 CITY OF NEY PO RT BEA CX $4.93 WATER USEAGE
t94 NDRTXYEST M0 OR WELD I PIG. INC, 5 .0 ENGINE PART
D 1004V4 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES f406.34 SAFM GLASSES
1OC 401 NAT. INST. OF STANDARDS 5196.00 LAB SUPPLIES
:4 2 D YMPIC ChEkICAL CO. $49,934.65 CHLORINE X.0.10-12-88
Cj 100403 0RANBE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY f170.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
300404 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. f972.20 CHEMICALS
N1004fis OXYGEN SERVICE $674,37 SPBCIALTT GASES
10040E COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT - 583.92 EMPLOYEE HEALTH PLAN CONTRIBUTION
m 100407 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $9,193.49 REIMBURSE WORKERS.COMB INSURANCE
t� 10040E PSSI 51.651.90 SEWER VIDEOS
--1 4 9 AC PUMPS $4.504.80 PUMP PARTS
EN 100410 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. f298.81 SAFETY SUPPLIES
100411 FACTFIC BELL $14953 TELEPHONE
U $93.76 CELLULAR SERVICES
100
413 FOUL FAFANEM $300.90 PEER REVIEW - TOPICS KPIDENOLOGY PROGRAM
100414 AER ANALYSIS ANG/6R f911. PUMP ANALYSIS
200415 4 M SONPUBLICATIONS. INC f0 .401 PUBLICATION
IN 100426 FARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $2,609960 COMPRESSOR PARTS
190417 PARTS UNLIMITED $535.44 AUTOROTIVE PARTS
10041E PELCHPIT PRESS f FS. 55 PUBLICATION
l OE419 PEAT, MARYICM. MAIN 5 COr $5,000.00 AUDITING SERVICES
160429 ROY PENDERGRAFT 5440.9D DEFERRED CONT DISTIBUTION
wi1OC422 PENNALL COMPANY $600.30 - CORE GRILLING
+� 100422 PHOTO f SOUND CO. i1r 920.29 COMPUTER SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT
lD
I 's
r pr.
NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 PAGE C
bU L, REPORT NUMBEP AP43 w
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
q
CLAIMS PAID J6 21 89 POSTING DA E 06 21 fig
+ WARRANT NO. VENDOR_ AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
1OC923 PICKWICK PAPER $1,313.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES
30G424 PIMA GR0 SYSTEMS. INC. 544o65.45 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
A 109425 UP r f 2.685.79 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-8-89
AI 100426 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. 13.950.60 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88
1OC427 PULSAFEEOER fl 453.36 PEE PARTS
01428 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. $54.13 PUMP PARTS
.M 100429 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $744.56 TRASH REMOYa
30P43U PECTC NC. 566 880. C. SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-88
D10043 .r . 16.355.88 VALVE PARTS
100432 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $2,347.00 ELECTRIC REPAIRS
m 100433 REMEDY TEMP 5579.00 _ TEMPORARY SERVICES
Z I
OV43p REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM $3,000.00 POSTAGE
D 105435 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $277.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
'A ior436 RENOLC POWER YRfiNSPISSICN 55,400.0c MECHANICAL REPAIRS
100437 RICHARDS* WATSON 6 GERSHON $17.402.62 LEGAL SERVICES 5-8-87
—4 ' 106439 RICOH CORPORATION $69.37 COPIER LEASES
m v 00439 RICHARD ROLFE S292,24 MEETING MUSE
3 100440 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL $1,915.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
rpp 10 CO AI POSEMOUNT/UNILOC S29d.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
WI 1p Op42 JOSEPH T. RYERSON S SON. INC, f229.47 STEEL
O 100443 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. f26S.60 PARTS CLEANER
10C4.4 SA NOON ENGINEERING r INC. $960.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
100445 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIF 2131.94 LAB SUPPLIES
A+I IOOogf SCIENCE APPLIC171CIS 1KTAL SI11.683.80 OCEAN SAMPLING M.0.8-I0-88
ail ]OG447 SEA COAST OESIGNS 3311.10 OFFICE FURNITURE
100446 SEA-ILAN $4,615.00 LAB EQUIPMENT
IDG-49 CITY OF SEAL BEACH 3108.50 WATER USEACE
100450 SEWER EQUIP. CO. OF AMERICA $1,192.96 TOOLS
(A as IOO AS SHAMROCK SUPPLY $174,2A JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
IUU452 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS 96I6.00 SOIL TESTING
HA... 100453 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $250.00 VIOLATION FEE
(� q54 HUGE SOULAGES 112q.to MEETING MUSE
1C0455 SOUTH COAST DODGE $19.77 AUTOMOBILE PARTS
100456 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $376,318.15 PE13R
057 SO. CAL. GAS NATURAL GAS
ID0454 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $10,349.27 DIESEL FUEL
100459 SPEC TECH WESTEPN Slt203*4! WELDING SUPPLIES
Inallp SPECIAL PLASTICSYSTEMS, , TUBING
IOL-61 STARBUCK TRUCK REFINISHING S3r175.00 SAND BLASTING
100462 STAR TOOL S SUPPLY CO. S2r718.52 TVOLS
100463 SURIA INC. 1532.0c VISOAL SUPPORT SERVICES
I',CC'
96p SUMMIT STEEL f74.P9 STEEL
100 gfie SUPELCOr INC. 5254.55 LAB SUPPLIES
1 C095A SUPERIOR SWEEPING 'OUTM A220.PO STREET SWEEPING
100467 THE SUPFLIEFS $4.654.69 HARDWARE
aoi 100460 SURVEVOPS SERVICE CO. $106.05 TDOLS
va
bU
I e�
� al
FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 PAGE 6
[y REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION ISTP IC OF OI1N2E T
CIY CLAIM, Pa10 06/21/69 POSTING BATE U6/21189
1.1 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
100469 TAN TAKAM INE fq,570.C0 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING
l OCq 70 TA YLOR-DUNN f 3 CART PARTS
100-71 TECHNICAL PRODUCTS B CTRLS f95q•00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
'P 100q 72 TEKMAR COMPANY 346T.43 LAB SUPPLIES
• 100473 THERMO ANALYTICAL, INC./NOFCAL 37R.00 LAB ERVICES
9 H A Is,6.3d TEMPORARY SERVICES
u 100475 THOMASON MECHANICAL CORP. $1,736.25 MECHANICAL PARTS
u 1304
76 TORRANCE LOSS CONTROL COPP. f895.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
u o W ADVE T RS ieT.11 MAILING SERVICES
A IOCg78 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE. INC. 3165.89 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES
m , IG0R7R TRAVEL TRAVEL i9B .CO TRAVEL SERVICES
m 0 0 v AND.00 WINDOW CLEWING
C IO T A81 TRUCK 9 AUTO SUPFLY. INC. $810.97 TRUCK PARTS
y .R 100182 J. TS OF ING. TUCK Efl 6 SON, INC. $675.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1C00 3 THE HER
$50.00 PUBLICATION
m 100980 U.S. AUTO GLASS CEN 7ERrINC. 313 B.P3 TeUCR PARTS
m IDOAB5 UNOCAL f 63.02 UNLEADED GASOLINE
3 486 THE UNISOURCE CORF. 68,170.59 PAPER !
IOU487 UNITED PARCEL SE P VI CE 3119.20 PARCEL SERVICES
Hu. OC408 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR f319 75 HAINT¢PANCB CONTRACT
h-� 1P q49 VYR SCIENTIFIC $482.27 LAB SUPPLIES
II 100490 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $6,268.15 VALYB PARTS
I µ. :}1Qa�'P'R91 VAR I4N IN TPU EN G 0 $1,464,23 LAB SUPPLIES
1100494
$211:30 MUCK PARTS
0C493 VERTEX 492 E SYSTEMS SPRING SERViC° .1.3 a, JG COMPUTER PROGRAM MAINTENANCE
ITi GA 9q VIMING IN
QU,TPIAL SUPPLY f890.q PAINT SUPPLIES
190-95 RICMARD Y. YON LANGEN $343.64 MEETING EXPENSE
C 100A96 JOHN R. YAPLES 3537.60 DOOR CONTROL CONSULTANT
100g97 WELLS FAR GO 6 AP RVICE $ 1 GUARD SERVICES
I00498 NESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUFFLY $53.J27.02 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-10-88
A 300999 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. 3588.25 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
1OP900 WESTRUY 14TIRNATIONIL i 24.59 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
n f r ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-2.2-26-3.2-27.2-28
m 100512 ROURKE S WOODRUFF $43,139.52 LEGAL 8¢RVIC¢3 M.0.10-1A-87
N 100503 XEROX CORP. fl J60.00 COPIER LEASE9 SUPPLIES
YELLOW SPRINGS v 211 LAB SERVICES
100-05 RICHARD YOUNG FROD. S1r299.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES
lu TOTAL CLAIMS PAIL '6/21/89 32r169,997.60
YwY
^'I
®
tp vr�
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/14/89 PAGE 7 /
REPORT NURNER AP43 \`
L COUNTY SANITATION ➢IBTRICTS OP ORANGE COUNTY
V CLAI D PO TING DATE 06 21 89
I� SU101ARY AMOUNT
• fil OPEN w B 73.66
B2 OPER FUND 3,762.33
/2 AM FUND $4.00
0 32,118.88
10 1
3 OPER FUND 25.209.11
83 AGO FUND 228.00
BS OPER FUND 4.111.05
D j• BS Y/0. YUNo 3.538.37
G'f B6 OPER FUND 1.889.24
Zr 06 ACO PUNO R52.00
0 •I B6 P/R FUND 129.00
a It•I B7 OPER FUND 6,I81.82
IIr1M fill OPER FUND 6,456.97
/14 OPER I= 20.53 ,
14 AM FUND 888.060 0
f°l :S&fi OPPE, Puxo 1,336
I5A6 ACO FUND 6.954.63
3! iy 87614 OPER FUND 240.00 I
r° T OPlI FOND 1,047,099.77
CORY 042,081.28
° SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 11.161.01
1JT nTST WORRIED CAPITAL IOND 175,031.33
°
r $2,169.447.60
r
z
En
!n IN
lui
.7
n
b
Ijr�
lA j Hl
I 4A
RESOLUTION NO. 89-67-1
AUTHORIZING FILING FOR FEDERAL AND STATE
CLEAN WATER GRANTS AND LOANS - 1 -90
J IN WORKS IMPROVEMENTS AND AD ITIONS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY
FOR FEDERAL AND STATE CLEAN WATER GRANTS AND LOANS UNDER
33 U.S.C., 1251 ET SEQ. ; AND CHAPTERS 12.5, 13, 14 AND 15;
DIVISION 7 OF THE CALIFORNIA WATER CODE ON BEHALF OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1: An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as amended (also known as the Clean Water Act and the Water Quality
Act of 1987) (33 U.S.C., 1251 et seq.) provides for federal grants and loans for
construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2: The State Clean Water Bond Laws of 1970, 1974, 1978 and 1984
and implementing statutes authorize the State Water Resources Control Board to
enter into contracts with public agencies for State grants and loans for
construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 3: County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County is a
separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5, of
the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, for the purpose of
constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the
collection of sewage from the cities and other local sewering agencies, and has
joined with other County Sanitation Districts - namely, County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, in constructing, operating and
"C-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1"
maintaining joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an
agreement datedJuly 1, 1985, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and
Construction Agreement.
Section 4: In accordance with the terms of said Joint Ownership,
Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange
County, California acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, each organized
for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County,
California, for the purpose of constructing and operating said joint sewage
treatment plants and disposal facilities.
Section 5: By means of this Resolution and of the Resolutions set forth
below by number, the fallowing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California have authorized the filing of applications for grants and loans under
said Acts of Congress and said Clean Water Band Laws and have authorized County
Sanitation District No. 1 to file said applications on their behalf:
DISTRICT NO. RESOLUTION NO.
2 89-68-2
3 89-69-3
5 89-70-5
6 89-71-6
7 89-72-7
11 89-73-11
13 89-74-13
14 89-75-14
Section 6: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, is hereby authorized and
directed to sign and file for and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California, acting for itself and as agent for County
"C-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2"
Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California, Application for a Federal Grant and/or Loan for Sewage Treatment
Works under 33 U.S.C. , 1251 at seq. , and a State Grant and/or Loan for Clean
Water under the Clean Water Bond Laws of 1970, 1974, 1978 and 1984, for a joint
project generally described as follows:
1989-90 Joint Works Improvements and Additions
Section 7: District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, hereby agrees and
further does authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if a
federal grant or loan for its project is made pursuant to the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. , 1251 et seq.) , it will pay the
remaining cost of the approved project; it will provide proper and efficient
operation and maintenance of the approved project after completion of
construction thereof; it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (F.L. 88-352) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto and state that
the assurance and compliance with such regulations attached to the application
for federal grant or loan applies to this project; and it will comply with
requirements of Executive Order 11246 pertaining to equal employment opportunity
in federally-assisted construction contracts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1989.
"C-3" AGENDA ITEM #111(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
d ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 BLUE AVENUE
FO.BOX 0127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CMUMANIA 827284121
91n BB2.2An
May 23, 1989
MEMORANDUM
TO: J. Wayne Sylvester
RE: Blueprinting, Photocopying and Related Services
Specification No. S-044
Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, May 2, 1989 for outside
Blueprinting, Photocopying and Related Services, for a period of
one year, beginning July 16, 1989. They are as follows:
Banana Blueprint, Irvine
Consolidated Reprographics, Costa Mesa
Continental Graphics, Irvine
OCB Reprographics, Irvine
Overall costs for the one year contract period are based on an
estimated projection as summarized on the attached tabulation
sheet. Taking these projections into consideration, the adjusted
gross annual bid amounts range from a low of $74,527.00 to a high
of $127,465.00. Continental Graphics, which affords an
additional 15% discount on all invoices paid within 30 days of
receipt of invoice, is the overall low bidder based on estimated
quantity, unit costs and discount with a net bid amount of
$63,911.00.
Unit prices bid for the high volume production services and
Xeroxing of specifications are 6.5% lower than the present
contract. Unit prices on the remaining items range from being
the same to approximately 6% lower.
It is recommended the award be made to Continental Graphics for a
one-year contract, for the gross annual amount not to exceed
$75,189.00, for all services bid under this specification, with
option to renew up to four, one-year extensions.
Respectfully submitted,
L. LeaFn,
SenioV Buyerj
"D-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1"
I I
We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendation:
Ted Hoffman/,
Purchasing;Manager 11
. 1
G. Atreed,
ief AdMinistrative Assistant and
Acting Director of Finance
014, "tO
Thomas M. Dawes,
Director of Engineering
LL:sw
"D-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2"
BID TABULATION
BLUEPRINTING, PHOTOCOPYING AND RELATED SERVICES
SPECIFICATION NO. 5-044
Banana Consol. Continental OCB
Blueprint Blueprint Graphics Repro.
a. Xerox 2080 $ 2,975 $ 2,565 $ 2,825 $ 5 ,000
b. Xerox 9500 & 9900 32, 115 23 ,739 23 ,788 41,400
c. Shacoh 920 1,140 816 910 1,600
d. Other Xerox Services 24,887 8,944 2,691 7,969
e. Color Xerox 6500 n/b 827 n/b n/b
f. Laser Color 2,645 2,248 2,345 2,289
g. Vello Bind Punching 275 123 125 150
h. Spiral Bind Punching 688 306 313 375
i. Vello Bind 1,595 907 930 3,050
j . Spiral Binding 8,575 4,949 5,050 6,385
k. Photographic Spec. Svcs. 9,420 3,108 4,869 13 ,710
1. Photographic Enlargements,
etc. 1,484 653 731 1,322
m. Diazo Service 41,775 25,509 28,662 43,225
n. Other Diazo 60 660 1,950 990
Sub-total $ 127,634 75,354 75,189 127 ,465
Adj . for Item E <827>
Sub-total 127,634 74,5 77 75,189 127,465
30-day Cash Discount -0- -0- <11 ,278> <1,275>
TOTAL $ 127,634 $ 74,527 $ 63,911 $126,190
--------- -------- -------- --------
--------- -------- -------- --------
"D-3" AGENDA ITEM kll(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 7
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Nine (9)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Denuet) $ 93,125.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 INTERIOR FINISH CHANGES
The Contractor was directed to revise the finishes for various rooms in the new
Administration Building addition. Included in the change order item is the
upgrading of all floor tile in the building and addition of approximately
700 square feet of floor tile in Room No. 146; the addition of stair-tread
covering and front and rear entrance matting; upgrading of plastic laminate in
Kitchen Nos. 111, 126 and 145; changing the countertop in Kitchen No. 111 to
Corian material; addition of plan and telephone counters in the new south wing;
changes to the painting schedule in Room Nos. 113, 116, 118, 140, 141, 142, 143,
and 145 and Stairway No. 1; upgrading of vinyl floor covering material in
Room Nos. 103, 104, 111, 121, 123, 126, and 145. These changes were recommended
by the project architect in order to provide better wearing surfaces which will
give longer service over the lifetime of the building. The above listed items
were not included in the contract drawings and specifications. This work was
negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference:
PCH #29; revised contract drawing sheets A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, A3.4, A5.1, A5.2,
A6.1, dated 9/9/89)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 27,386.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 7 Calendar Days
Item 2 "E" LINE WALL ADDITION AND SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
The Contractor was directed to construct a 2-inch by 4-inch stud wall on the
exterior of the existing Administration Building at reference line "E" in order to
provide support for the new south wing second floor where it meets the existing
building. Included in this item is additional shear reinforcement on the inside
wall of the existing two-story Administration Building along reference line "E"
consisting of plywood shear paneling, framing and foundation anchors. These
changes were required by the project architect and structural engineer and were
not included in the contract drawings or specifications. This work was negotiated
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)8 of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH N24
and FCO #26)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 7,119.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 2 Calendar Days
"E-1" AGENDA 1TEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 7
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Nine (9)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4
Item 3 ADDITIONAL ROOF SUPPORT UNDER AIR HANDLING UNITS IN NEW SOUTH WING
The Contractor was directed to provide additional support under the two
ventilation system air handling units installed on the roof of the new south 'wing.
This support consisted of fabrication and installation of six new extra-heavy
roof trusses under the plywood roof sheathing. In order to install these new
trusses, it was necessary to remove and relocate previously installed wood
framing, electrical conduits and heating and ventilating ductwork. Included in
this item is the cost of scaffold rental , steel reinforcement of glue-laminated
beams supporting the roof trusses and removal and reworking of the concrete
support pads for the air handling units. This change was required by the project
architect and structural engineer and was necessary because the installed weight
of the air handling units was approximately fifty percent greater than had been
anticipated during design of the project. The additional support modifications
were not shown on the contract drawings or included in the contract
specifications. This item of work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A
of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #39)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 16,668.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 14 Calendar Days
Item 4 NEW MAIL ROOM ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to add a new 10-foot by 14-foot 6-inch mailroom inside
Room 121 in the new south wing. Included in this change were wood framing of two
walls, drywall and finish, suspended ceiling with four new recessed fluorescent
lighting fixtures, relocation of Door No. 26 and the addition of Door No. 59, fir
sprinkler relocation, ventilation duct addition and relocation, addition of two
electrical circuits, six duplex outlets, addition of a wall switch and relocation
of two wall switches for Room No. 121. This change was requested by staff in
order to provide a separate area for mail processing. The new mailroom was not
shown on the contract drawings or included in the contract specifications. This
item of work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions. (Reference: PCH #32)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 10,764.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 3 Calendar Days
�7
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 7
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Nine (9) _
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 2 , 1989
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4
Item 5 WATERPROOF EXTERIOR STAIRWAY LANDING
The Contractor was directed to waterproof the top landing of Exterior Stairway
No. 3 where it enters the second floor of the new south wing. Included in this
change is the installation of a raised entry door threshold, sheet metal flashing
around the perimeter of the landing, replacement of the lightweight concrete pad
on top of the landing and application of a Dex-O-Tex waterproofing membrane by a
waterproofing subcontractor. These changes were required by the project architect
to prevent water from penetrating into the building from the stair landing that
was not waterproofed as shown on the contract drawings. Changes included in this
item were not shown on the contract drawings or included in the contract
specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the
General Provisions. -(Reference: PCH #33)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 3,989.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 6 SOFFIT AND WALL ADDITION IN ROOM 129
The Contractor was directed to frame in a 1-foot by 4-foot by 28-inch long soffit
in Room 129 where it meets the existing Administration Building. Also included in
this change is the cost of framing a 4-foot long stud wall in the northeast corner
of Room 129 in order to conceal two 4-inch roof drain downspout pipes. Additional
drywall and finish work was also required to complete the installation. The
soffit and wall additions were requested by the project architect in order to
conceal the two 4-inch chilled water pipes where they enter the existing
Administration Building on the north side of Room 129 and to conceal the roof
drains. The above changes were not shown on the contract drawings nor included in .
the contract specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #38)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 1,982.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 7 BOARDROOM EXTERIOR PLANTER MODIFICATION
The Contractor was directed to modify the concrete block planter on the exterior
of the boardroom in the new south wing. Included in this change is the addition
of another 32-foot long by 2-foot high concrete block wall and concrete footing t�.
enclose the planter, sheet metal flashing and the cost of waterproofing the
"E-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 7
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927D8
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Nine (9)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 20, 1989
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION JOB NO. J-7-4
planter interior. This change was requested by the project architect in order to
confine the earth in the planter within an area enclosed by concrete block walls
and not against the new plaster building as shown on the contract drawings. The
contract drawings and specifications did not include these modifications. This
item of work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions. (Reference: PCH #34)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,266.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 8 WHEELCHAIR LIFT ENCLOSURE
The Contractor was directed to enclose the wheelchair lift for handicapped persons
at the north end of the new south wing on the second floor. This change was
requested by the project architect and staff to conceal the unsightly chairlift
mechanical equipment. Included in this item is framing and finish work around the
. lift equipment, addition of two interlocking wood doors and lighting and wiring
inside the wheelchair lift enclosure. The wheelchair lift enclosure was not shown
on the contract plans or included in the contract specifications. This item of
work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH #35)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,679.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 9 COUNTERTOP DETAILS AND MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to construct countertops and bathroom vanities
according to details furnished by the project architect. The countertop
modifications included framing and finish work for the plan counter adjacent to
Kitchen No. 126, the food serving counter outside Kitchen No. 111, the telephone
counter in Lobby No. 1, and shelving in the closet adjacent to Room 112. Bathroom
vanity modifications included construction details and finish work in Bathroom
Nos. 113, 116 and 118. These details, provided by the project architect, were
requested by staff as they were not included in the contract drawings or
specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the
General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #29, 29A, 29B)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 29467.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"E-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 7
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 1D844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Nine (9)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4
Item 10 NORTH PERIMETER ROAD CLEANUP
The Contractor was directed to provide labor and equipment to clean along the
North Perimeter Road from the main entrance to Fuentes Drive. The cleanup
included dressing and grading the north road shoulder with a skiploader, cutting
of weeds and rental of a water truck to wash down the street. This work was
requested by staff and was not included in the contract plans or specifications.
This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO #42)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,040.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 11 HEATING AND VENTILATING COMPRESSOR INSTALLATION
The Contractor was directed to install the heating and ventilating system air
compressor and air dryer. This item includes installation of the compresser and
air dryer in the existing Elevator Equipment Room 134, providing a 440-volt
circuit breaker, conduit and wiring to panel "PSI", rerouting an existing
disconnect switch conduit and wiring and installing a new ceiling fan and
thermostat switch in Room 134 to provide ventilation for the compressor. The air
compressor and dryer were required by the contract plans and specifications for
location or electrical installation. This item of work was negotiated pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General- Provisions. (Reference: PCH #40)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,313.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 12 STEEL DOOR FRAME MODIFICATION
The Contractor was directed to modify the type of steel door frames to be
installed in the new south wing. The type of steel door frame was changed from
wrap-around to recessed at the request of staff. This was done in order to save
approximately one month in anticipated delay costs associated with the
installation of standard wrap-around steel door frames secured to exposed wood
framing prior to interior drywall installation. With the use of recessed steel
door frames, drywall installation and finish painting can proceed while the
Contractor is awaiting fabrication and delivery of the steel -door frames. Steel
"E-5" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-5"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 7
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
�... FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER _
C.O. NO. Nine (9)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 20, 989
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION JOB NO. J-7-4
door frame delivery was, in turn, delayed due to delays in preparing the building
hardware schedule from which the frames are fabricated. The contract plans and
specifications did not specify the more expensive recessed steel door frames.
This item of work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions. (Reference: PCH #39; Contract CO $6)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,577.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar days
Item 13 FIRE RATED CEILING ADDITION FOR ROOM 121
The Contractor was directed to add a one-hour rated ceiling in the Plan Storage
Room 121. This change consisted of doubling the ceiling framing supports and the
addition of one layer of 5/8-inch, Type-X drywall on top of the ceiling framing
to comply with fire code requirements. The one-hour rated ceiling was not shown
on the contract drawings nor included in the contract specifications and was
required by the project architect to provide fire protection for the proposed plan
storage room. This item of work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of
the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO d47)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,875.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 93,125.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 34 Calendar Days
The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to
the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 34 days extension of time to perform
the work is required for this Change Order. Districts and Contractor agree that
this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime work, resulting
in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime work. Districts and
Contractor agree that the added cost described in Items 1 - 13 above constitute
full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor,
and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses,
losses dor damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as
expressly granted and approved. by this Change Order.
"E-6" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-6"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 7 of 7
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92798
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Nine (9)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 0, 1989
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION JOB NO. J-7-4
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date July 11, 1988
Original Contract Time 602 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date March 4, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 34 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 65 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 667 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date May 8, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 3,549,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (Add) (Bedwet) $ 66—
Amended Contract Price
Board Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
1 .-
Z
onstruction Manager Date
J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION
ACCEPTED BY: ,i APPROVED BY:
ontractor Date Director o Engineering Date
"E-7" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-7"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seventeen (17)
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE July
JOB: OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-15
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (9eAuet) $317,661.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - ADDITIONAL PAVING
An all weather access from the west to the pump station was not originally
provided along with a parking area adjacent to the west side of the building. An
asphalt ramp was placed from the southeast corner of the truck wash to the
southwest end of the digester cleaning beds plus an asphalt and a gravel parking
area at the pump station requiring 4,000 sq. ft. of asphalt paving and 2400 sq.
ft. of gravel . This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the
General Provisions. (Reference PCH 093)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,562.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - INSTALL BASE COVE
The contract drawings and specifications did not provide for a base cove at the
base of the walls in the utility room on the main floor and the elevator machinery
room in the lower level of the pump station. The Contractor was directed to place
approximately 60 feet of base cove which was installed. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference PCH 104)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 278.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 3 - MODIFY PUMP PLATFORM
During the erection of the platform on top of Pump No. 1 in the lower level of the
pump station, there was an interference with the FRP ventilation duct previously
installed along the north wall . The platform was removed, shipped back to
fabricator' s shop, reworked by making the platform smaller and re-erected. This
work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference PCH 077)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,389.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"F-1'" AGENDA ITEM #11(d) - ALL DISTRICTS 7-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 ,
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE. ORDER `../
C. 0. NO. Seventeen (17)
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE July 12, 1989
JOB: OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-15
Item 4 - 96-INCH BUTTERFLY VALVE
In July 1987, while modifications were being performed on Surge Tower No. 2, it
was noted that the valve disc of the 96-inch butterfly valve at the base of the
tower was cracked. Preparations began for engineering and replacement with a new
valve (existing valve cannot be repaired). The Contractor was instructed to
purchase a new valve and modify the 66-inch by-pass elbow. The installation of
the valve and elbow will be performed in the fall of 1989. This item was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the
General Provisons.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 62,432.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 - REDUCE RETENTION
Presently the Contractor has $950,000.00 in certificates of deposit as security
for the 5% retention presently withheld for the project. All work is complete.
This item authorizes the reduction of retention to $50,000.00 and that the
retention be withheld until the closeout agreement is approved.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 6 - BONUS PAYMENT
The contract provided separate bonus and penalties for completion of certain major
elements of work. This item is for the bonus or incentive payment ofr the early
completion of the Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C". The contract specified 730
days for the completion of this element of work. The provisions include
liquidated damages of $2,000 for each day if completed prior to the 730 days, but
not to exceed 60 days. Thus, $2,000 per day which is $240,000. .
Item Contract Actual Days Bonus/ Bonus
No. Completion Date Bonus Date Completion Date Bonus Day Amount
1. Oct. 4, 1989 Oct. 4, 1989 June 30, 1989 L.S. $120,000 $120,000
2. Oct. 4, 1989 Aug. 5, 1989 June 30, 1989 60 Max 2,000 $120,000
$240,000
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $240,000.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days `...�
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $317,661.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
"F-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seventeen (17)
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE - Ju y 2, 1989
JOB: OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB N0. J-15
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
revisions to the Contract Time made by this and any previously issued Change
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this
Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or
expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date July 20, 1987
Original Contract Time 940 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date February 13, 1990
Time Extension This C.O. - 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 74 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 1014 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date April 28, 1990
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $18,476,243.00
Prev. Auth. Changes 585,202. 9
This Change (Add) (8edust) 3 7, 6 .00
Amended Contract Price 19,379,106.79
Board Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY: � -7
'�' �.- ( 4-.2'-89
onstruction Manager Uate
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY:
Lont<Vtv,rJ e Tirectur OT Lngineering u ate
"F-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 1...�
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Four (4)
CONTRACTOR: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE July 12, 19
JOB: PREPURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE FRE UENCY DRIVE SYSTEMS AND
—6U1FP3 Fb�dZEAN 6UY Ab3Y€[t—$ T PLAAfNO 2 15A
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (&edwr%) $ 41,052.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - TEST AND CALIBRATE RELAYS
The Contractor was instructed to. set, test and calibrate 20 sets of existing time
over current relays in accordance with a coordinating study performed after the
contract was awarded, including a functional check of relays to assure they are
working properly. There are 9 sets in the 12 KV Service Center, 4 sets in the 12
KV Distribution Center "A" and 7 in Distribution Center, "B". This work was
negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference
PCH 004)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 2,920.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - MODIFY WIRING AND CALIBRATE TRANSDUCERS
It was discovered that the Southern California Edison electrical power has a
different power phase sequence than that indicated on contract drawings. The
Contractor was instructed to modify the wiring for six voltage measuring
transformers in the 12 KV switchgear and to test and certify 20 calibrations of
voltage, current and power factor in ten transducers in the same 12 KV switchgear.
This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions. (Reference PCH 003)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 4,875.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Four (4)
CONTRACTOR: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE July
JOB: PREPURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE SYSTEMS AND
— PUMP'S FOR OCEANOUTFALL BOWER STATION 0C11 T PCXNT0.-77737T ,1 m
Item 3 - GROUND FAULT RELAYS
The contract drawings and specifications did not provide a ground fault protection
system for various branch circuits of the new 12 KV switchgear (furnished on J-15
contact). It was determined this protection was necessary to minimize the
switchgear being affected by a branch fault and a total of six ground relays were
installed. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the
General Provisions. (Reference PCH 002)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 33,257.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 41,052.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
revisions to the Contract Time made by this and any previously issued Change
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for the Change
Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses
have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original ontract Date September 30, 1986
Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date September 28, 1988
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 730 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date September 28, 1989
Original Contract Price $ 4 025 440.00
Prev. Auth. Changes S
This Change (Add) Wedwet) $ OO—
Amended Contract Price $ 3,9
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �..�
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Four (4)
CONTRACTOR: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE July 12, 1989
JOB: PREPURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE SYSTEMS AND
PUMPS FOR OCEAN 09TFAIL BOOSTER STATION "7 rN
Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
i
onsion manager Date
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
ACCEPTED BY: ;APP2ROBY:
I.an ractor rector OT Lngineering Date
"G-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE July 12, 1989
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS,
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (bedu") $ 50,658.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - OVEREXCAVATION AND RECOMPACTION UNDER BUILDING 3 AND 4
The Contractor was directed to remove and recompact existing soils to a depth of
approximately 6 feet below the new foundations of Buildings 3 and 4. The removal
and recompaction was directed by the Districts' Soils Consultant per the
recommendation of the project geotechnical investigation, in order to provide a
stable pad for construction of the buildings. The contract plans and
specifications did not include this additional work for Buildings 3 and 4. This
item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)8 of the General Provisons. (Reference: FCO #3 and #4)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 34,305.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 7 Calendar Days
Item 2 - STRUCTURAL STEEL SHOP DRAWING REVISIONS
The Contractor has requested compensation for revisions to structural steel shop
drawings that were prepared based on the bid contract drawings. The revisions
were necessary after the Districts received a complete set of revised structural
drawings from the project structural engineer two months after construction had
begun on the project. The changes were initiated by the project architect and the
Districts' project manager was not informed of any of the changes until they were
submitted by the project structural engineer. The Districts' project manager was
informed by the project structural engineer that the revisions were the result of
errors by the project architect. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons.
ADDED COST THIS-CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 4,417.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
"H-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE July 1 ,, 19
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS,
Item 3 - REGRADING OF BUILDING PADS FOR BUILDINGS 3, 4, 5 AND 6
The Contractor was directed to regrade building pads for Buildings 3, 4, 5 and 6.
The contract drawings designated sloped floors for each of the above buildings and
a new floor elevation for Building 3 that did not meet the existing floor
elevation of mechanical shop Building "B". The new Buildings 4, 5 and 6 are to be
totally enclosed with offices and bin storage and a sloped floor in these
buildings would have been detrimental to their operation. It was necessary to
regrade the earth pad of Building 3 to match the floor elevation of the existing
adjacent Building "B". This additional work was requested by the Districts'
representative after consultation with the Districts' design and maintenance staff
and was not shown on the contract drawings nor included in the contract
specifications. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant
to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #6)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 9,626.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 3 Calendar Days
Item 4 - CITY WATER LINE REROUTE AT CHILLER BUILDING
The Contractor was directed to reroute installation of the new 6-inch city water
line adjacent to the existing grit chambers. This was done to avoid an existing
concrete encased electrical duct bank conflicting with the alignment of the new
water line. The Districts' representative directed the Contractor to relocate the
water line 2 feet south to avoid the duct bank which was not shown correctly on
the contract drawings. Also included in this item is the potholing of existing
utilities in order to determine a new alignment for the water line. This item was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the
General Provisons. (Reference FCO #7)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 2,310.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 50,658.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 10 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
Incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
Issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 10 days' extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
"H-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
�.,.i FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts DATE July 12, 1989
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date February 27, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date October 25, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 10 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 29 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 269 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date November 23, 1989
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 3 266 000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 300
This Change (Add) (De& et)Amended Contract Contract Price
Board Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
Construction Manager Date
J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION /
AC 72D BY: � APPROVED BY: I
Lbntractor Date hector of nginee;t- ate
"H-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 ,
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �.►�
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Nineteen (19)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE July
JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1 JOB No. P1-20• AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS
N
VIN L TN JOB NU. -3
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduet) S 34,839.53
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Job No. P1-20
Item 1 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install landscaping and irrigation
piping in the area adjacent to the new screen wall along the south side of the
North Perimeter Road. This area was not specified to have landscaping due to the
conflict with the major construction of the new headworks facilities. The major
construction in this area is now complete and no conflict exists. To coordinate
the landscaping of the entire area, which involved two separate contracts, it was
decided to install all landscaping simultaneously. The P1-20 Contractor will
subcontract with the same landscaper as the other project eliminating any
warranty problems or differences in growth heights. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisons.
(Reference FCO #143)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14,115.71
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 LIGHT FIXTURE ADDITION AT NORTH ROAD
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install two light fixtures and one
30-foot pole on the center median of the North Perimeter Road. The light pole
base and electrical wiring were incorporated into the project. The light pole
and fixtures were not shown on the contract drawing and were going to be
specified to be supplied in another project. During the design stages of the
project it was thought that the installation of this light pole during the
construction of the P1-20 project would have conflicted with the adjacent
designated construction zone. At the present time the construction zone is no
longer needed by the Contractor and it was decided to add the light fixture now
to complete all required construction in this area. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons.
(Reference PCH #90 and FCO #151)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 3917.74
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"I-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - All DiSTR1CTS ^i-i
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
�d FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Nineteen (19)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE July 12, 989
JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. P1-20• AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS
N L M N 8 L IN LEAN U ; AND GR NG AN
PAVING AT PL NI NU. 1, J08 NU.
Item 3 WATER DAMAGE AT THE BASEMENT OF POWER BUILDING 3A
During a Districts' shutdown and rerouting of gas compressor cooling water, the
Districts' sump pumps failed during the early morning hours causing a backup of
Water into the Power Building 3A basement area. This area had been designated
the Contractor's storage area for paint, valves, fittings, electrical/hydraulic
tools and instrument meters. An 18-inch + build up of water occurred prior to
discovery by the Contractor. The Contractor was directed to perform extra work
required to restore the power building basement and the Contractor's damaged
equipment. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #146)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,033.92
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 GROUNDWATER LEAKAGE AT BYPASS CHANNEL
The Contractor was directed to repair groundwater leakage at the connection of
the existing influent channel and the new by-pass channel . The contract drawings
did not incorporate the installation of waterstop at this connection and, after
installation, leakage was discovered in the new by-pass channel from the outside
groundwater pressures. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #144)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,827.32
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL ADDITION AT EXISTING HEADWORKS NO. 1
The Contractor was directed to construct a concrete retaining wall around the
existing air receiver tank adjacent to the chlorine room at Headworks No. 1.
This additional construction was required to raise the finish .grade elevations to
ensure proper drainage and prevent a possible safety hazard in this area. This
item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the
General Provisons. (Reference FCO #132
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,803.08
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"I-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �..�
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Nineteen (19)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Company DATE July 12,
JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20• AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS
AND M B N N N N
PAVIN �A PLAN N , JOB N .
Job No. P1-20
Item 6 CLEAR AND GRUB AREA SOUTH OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT TRAILER COMPLEX
The Contractor was directed to regrade the area south of the Construction
Management Trailers and to fill with stockpiled select material . This area will
be designated for Districts' temporary storage of equipment and materials during
the construction of the new Warehouse Buildings. This work was not incorporated
in the original contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons.
(Reference FCO #142)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,251.49
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Job No. P1-31
Item 1 UNFORESEEN OBSTRUCTIONS AT DIGESTER NOS. 5 AND 6
During the excavation and removal of existing asphalt adjacent to Digester Nos. 5
and 6, north of the existing digester gas flares and area just north of the catch
basin at sludge loading facility, the Contractor encountered utility piping at
subgrade elevation. These utilities were not shown on the contract drawings and
conflicted with the installation of base material for final paving in these
areas. One of the utilities needed to be replaced and others were required to be
protected in place. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #145 and FCO 1152)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,890.27
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 34,839.53
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extension to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
"I-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
V.d P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Nineteen (19)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE July 89
JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1 JOB NO. P1-20; AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS
N L N L N ; AND GRADING
PAVINb A] N
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date October 21, 1987
Original Contract Time 920 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date April 27, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 63 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 983 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date June 29, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 31,458 000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ €4331
This Change (Add) Wedwet) $-34, 5�
Amended Contract Price $ 33, 2
Board Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. �•
onstruction manager Uate
ACCEPTED BY: APPROV-ED, BY: l
Contractor Date Wrector of Engineer-5—g-----Fat—e
"i-4" AGFNTIA TTFM #11 (a) - All IITCTPICTC 11T-i r,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �.►
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fifteen (15)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE July
Zurn Constructors, nc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT N0. 1 JOB NO. P1-25• FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
SYSTEM N N B -26; V PRI Y INS AT PLAN
NO. , JOB N . P2- 2;�FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYST M AT PLAN N 2, N0.
AN MP M NT A LI BILL NG NN L N
DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE "A , JOB N . P -34.
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct:) $ 96,870.53
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Job No. P2-33
Item 1 INSTALLATION OF DIAPHRAGM VALVES - CHLORINE SOLUTION PIPING
Four CPVC ball valves were specified for installation in the new chlorine solution
system that was installed between the existing chlorination station and the new
North Scrubber Complex. Prior to the installation of the specified isolation
valves, staff recommended that the ball valves be changed to diaphragm valves as
the ball valves would not provide a tight shutoff of the chemical line. The
contractor installed four diaphragm-type valves and turned over the specified ball
valves to the Districts for future use. Work was performed on a direct cost plus
percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,718.47
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM FOUL AIR PLENUM SUPPORT CHANGES
Portions of the structural aluminum framing designed to support the foul air
intake air plenums and elevated access walkways at the scrubber complexes were in
conflict with the FRP and HOP ductwork connections at the plenums and in one case
elimnated headroom at a stair structure. To eliminate the conflicts additional
structural aluminum columns were provided, columns were relocated and intermediate
horizontal and diagonal bracing had to be modified, and in some cases new bracing
added. Work was performed on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of
the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 73,877.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"J-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fifteen (15)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructorst. Division of DATE July 98
Zurn onstructors, nc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS Al PLANT N0. 1, JOB NO. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
SYSTEM PLANT N0. B N0. P - OV R eKIKAKY B SIN AT TLAN
UOB se; UL AIR SCRUBBERMS AT PLANTNO. 2 JOB NO.
- 3; ANU IMMUftMEN L11TBL NNtL
ANU
DISTRIBUTION U U 'A", JOB NO. P2-3 .
Job No. P2-34
Item 3 ADDITIONAL CONCRETE DEMOLITION - HEADWORKS "C"
During. the demolition of a portion of the south wall of Headworks "C", required
for the construction of the new concrete influent structure, the contractor
uncovered a major quantity of fill concrete in the headworks effluent channel .
The fill concrete was not shown on the contract drawings and had to be removed to
complete the new influent structure. The contractor removed the fill concrete and
performed the necessary additional patch work on a direct cost plus percentage
basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,145.91
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 EXTENSION OF PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN "P" BY-PASS PIPING
Primary Sedimentation Basin "P" was used to develop a typical by-pass pumping
system that was to be used at each of the primary basins at Plant 2 to by-pass the
underground primary effluent system during its rehabilitation. Piping placed in
the launder of the basin to serve as by-pass pump suction piping did not extend
beyond the width of the basin walkway. In order to construct the new basin
walkway the pump suction piping had to be extended to clear the walkway width.
Work was performed on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,129.15
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 96,870.53
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
"J-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Fifteen (15)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE July 12, 1989
urn Constructors. Inc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB N0. P1-25• FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
N BN IMR VLANI
N0. JOB N P2-3 UL AI U E S M LAN N0. B N .
- A M MEN T GRIT FA IL B" BILLINGS T NNEL AND
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date November 24, 1987
Original Contract Time 540 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date May 16, 1989
Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 121 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 661 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date September 14, 1989
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 15,893,393.00
Prev. Auth.Changes $---U154,350.42
This Change (Add) (Deddet) $ 03i
Amended Contract Price $ ZU,144,biJ.95
Board Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
Construction Manager Date
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF
ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
ACCEPTED BY: APPR01 Y:
(; I
��' �Cn�..° �/�41r4 / , � ice. �zr�5 1••�
on�t-r-acctor ate ector ot Lngineering Uate
"J-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
�✓ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE July
Zurn onstructors, nC.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB N0. P1-25• FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. B NO. P1- 6; COVERS R PR A N T PLANT
N N 2- FOUL A PLANT N N .
2- L N
N STRUCTURE B
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (9edust) $ 97,868.43
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Job No. P2-32
Item 1 REPAIRS TO POLYURETHANE COATING - PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS "P" AND "0"
When each of the basins were drained and cleaned in preparation for the initial
stage of dome erection, the Contractor reported that portions of the polyurethane
coating system in the effluent launders were separated from the launder walls.
. The coating system was applied initially to protect the launder wall concrete from
hydrogen sulfide deterioration. To maintain the integrity of the balance of the
launder wall coating system and to permit the start of dome structure erection,
the Contractor was instructed to repair the damaged protective coating system.
Work was done on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,999.87
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 ADDITION OF ACCESS HATCHES - PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS "A", "B" AND "C"
COVERS
Prior to the installation of the new flat covers for Basins "A", "B" and "C", the
basins were uncovered and sampling of sewage and inspection of equipment could be
accomplished without difficulty. The new flat covers did not have provisions for
access to the basin contents for sampling. The access doors provided at the scum
collector mechanism enclosures were too large for one man to handle safely. This
change order item provides for the installation of 30 access hatches for sampling
sewage at the basins and 18 access hatches at the scum collector mechanism
enclosures for equipment inspection, maintenance and washdown work. Work to be
performed on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 26,883.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE .ORDER
C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE July 12. 1989
Zurn onstructors, 1.
.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB No. P1-25• FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
PLANTSYSTEM A[ N N L N
NO. - ysjLm5 AT PLANTNO. 2. JOB NO.
M N L N L A
ON U U N .
Job No. P2-33
Item 3 INCREASE SIZE OF FOUL AIR DAMPER SHAFTS
Fiberglass air dampers are installed at various locations in the foul air duct
systems to control quantities of air and to provide a means of isolating foul air
equipment. The fiberglass shaft size specified for the various dampers was too
small to accommodate the attachment of stainless steel hardware of the damper
shaft control am. This change order item provides for an increase in the size of
the fiberglass damper shafts to make them compatible with the specified control
arms. Work was performed on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of
the General Provisions. -
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 677.15
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Job No. P2-34
Item 4 MODIFY PFLANZ HEADWORKS ROOF DRAIN PIPING
The Pflanz Headworks roof drain piping, as it existed, was in direct conflict with
the installation of the new main sewage pump discharge piping. This change order
item provides for the removal of the existing drain and replacing same with new
piping in a new location. Work was performed on a direct cost plus percentage
basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,047.42
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 STOP LOGS AND GUIDES - EFFLUENT LAUNDERS - PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS
At the time the scope of work for the rehabilitation of the underground primary
effluent system at Plant 2 was developed, sand bags were to be used to stop the
leakage of primary effluent through the effluent structure and into the open
trenches created by the removal of the deteriorated underground effluent system.
The condition created by the leakage of primary effluent through the sand bag
dikes made it impossible to perform the necessary concrete modifications at each
of the basin effluent structures. This change order item provided for the
installation of stainless steel stop log guides and timber stop logs at each of
the Plant 2 circular pirmary basins to eliminate the leakage of primary effluent
into adjacent pipe excavations during the rehabilitation of the underground
primary effluent system. Work was performed on a direct cost plus percentage
basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,701.82
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"K-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE July 89
Zurn onstructors, nc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-25• FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
SYSTEM L N BN . RP AIN A PLAN
NU. B NU.
N L LL N N L N
IBUTIUN UCTURE "A", JOB N . -34.
Item 6 MODIFICATION OF WALKWAYS, BERMS AND RAILINGS - PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION
BASINS "D", "E", "F" AND "G"
The original plans for the modification work for all typical circular basins were
not prepared according to current OSHA regulations. The existing walkways were
too narrow to meet the minimum width requirements. As the contract documents did
not require the widening of existing walkways, the specified modifications and the
addition of new railings could not be accomplished. This change order provides
for the widening of existing asphaltic concrete stairways, the change of scope at
walkway berms and the additon of reinforced concrete walkways and railings where
asphaltic concrete walkways and berms could not be constructed to meet OSHA
regulations. Work was performed at Basins "D", "E", "F" and "G" on a direct cost
plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the Gneeral Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 56,288.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 7 RELOCATION OF EXISTING PROCESS AIR LINE - HEADWORKS nC"
The plans for the modifications to Headworks "C" facilities required the
contractor to relocate one 4-inch air line that would interfere with the
installation of new stainless steel foul air ductwork. In addition to the 4-inch
line shown on the drawings, there was another 2-inch air line that interfered with
the installation of the ductwork. This change order item provides for the
relocation of the 2-inch air line not shown on the contract drawings. Work was
performed on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B
of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,271.17
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 97,868.43
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
\✓ Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
"K-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(h)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE July , 1989
urn Constructors'
C.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB N0. P1-25• FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
M N
PLAN[ N .
AN
R
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date November 24, 1987
Original Contract Time 540 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date May 16, 1989
Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 121 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 661 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date September 14, 1989
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 15,893,393.00
Prev. Auth.Changes $ 6TS5
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 9 868.
Amended Contract Price $ ZU,ZU148Z.38
Board Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
Construction Manager Date
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF
ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
ACCEPTED BY: APP7VEBY:CE : f;
Contractor Da a rector of Engineering Date
"K-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
�...i FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE July 12, 1989
JOB: ENTRANCES SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1,
JOB N . 1-27
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $20,652.88
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 REROUTE. TRAFFIC COUNTER CIRCUIT
The existing traffic counter circuit at the intersection of Ellis Avenue and the
new Main Entrance conflicted with the new asphalt paving grades in the area. The
Contractor was directed to reroute the circuit to avoid the conflict. This
required extra trenching, conduit and wire thoughout the intersection to maintain
the existing traffic counter circuit. This item was accomplished by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)8 of the General Provisons.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,258.05
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 GATE CONTROL MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to modify gate control conduit, loop detectors,
pavement striping, pull boxes, and card reader pedestals to allow proper
operations of the entire gate control system.. The gate control conduit was
required to be relocated due to the future removal of an existing electrical vault
which was specified to be used on the contract plans. The existing electrical
vault conflicts with the proposed extension of the 78-inch Baker/Giesler trunk
line and will be removed in a future project. The card readers pedestals were
modified to provide easier accessibility for personnel to the card readers and to
conform with the architectural finish of lighting fixtures and poles in the area.
This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of
the General Provisons. (Reference PCH i3)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,723.20
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"L-1" AGENDA ITEM #110 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 ,
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �✓
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE July
JOB: ENTRANCES SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1
No.
Item 3 CURB MODIFICATION AND GUARD SHACK
The Contractor was directed to modify the curb at the two entrances at the guard
shack. The curb was installed per the contract drawings and conflicted with
sidewalk elevations. To avoid a safety hazard the curbs were saw cut, removed and
replaced with a sloping curb which matched the sidewalk elevations and eliminated
the possibility of a tripping hazard. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference
FCO #18)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 744.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 WASTE HAUL BUILDING MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to furnish and intall an additional roof exhaust fan
and relocate two windows in the Waste Haul Building. These modifications were
required to accommodate a future project which will be incorporating a separate
sampler room within the Waste Haul Building. It was found to be more cost
efficient to perform these modifications during the construction of the building
in lieu of incorporating them in the future project. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons.
(Reference FCO #19)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,498.84
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 CITY WATER PIPING MODIFICATION
The Contractor was directed to modify the installation of the 10-inch city water
pipeline located at the plant's north and east property lines. The pipe line was
shown on the plans to be located above ground. This pipe line will supply water
to the new city water pump station which will be installed in a future project.
During construction it was determined to install this line below grade with minor
modifications which resulted in a substantial net cost savings to the Districts.
This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of
the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #11) l
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 10,435.45) `ar'
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"L-2" AGENDA ITEM #110) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE July
JOB: ENTRANCES SITE SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1
No.
Item 6 DIRECTIONAL SIGN MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to modify the directional signs along the roadways
throughout the project. The sixteen signs were changed from internally
illuminated to externally illuminated. The externally illuminated signs will
incorporate removable sections giving the Districts the ability to change the
wording on each sign easily when required. The modified sign system will result
in a net cost savings to the Districts, but involves a longer delivery schedule
requiring a time extension of 24 days to the contract. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons.
(Reference PCH #6 and PCH #9)
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 2,319.91)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 24 Calendar Days
Item 7 GUARD SHACK PIPING MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a potable water supply and
drain pipe lines for the restroom addition to the guard shack. This involved
approximately 95 feet of city water pipe and 275 feet of drain line. These pipe
lines, and the restroom facilities, were not in the contract, and added by staff.
This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of
the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #5 and FCO #17)
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,184.15
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 20,652.88
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 24 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
Incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
"L-3" AGENDA ITEM #11( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 `..✓
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE July 12, 1989
JOB: ENTRANCES, SITE SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1
JO
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date November 10, 1988
Original Contract Time 250 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date July 17, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 24 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 24 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 274 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date August 10, 1989
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 1,590,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ G7044—
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $' ems
Amended Contract Price $ 82
Board Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
ti
ate onstruction Manager
KIEWIT PACIFIC CO.
ACCEPTED BY: AP! OVED--BY: %
Contractor ate IS rector of Engin�ing DAi:e
"L-4" AGENDA ITEM #11( i ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
' i OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIAa2708-7018
(714)962-2411
June 28, 1989
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 2 to the Professional
Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers in Connection
with Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following
fee with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for Addendum No. 2 for the design of
Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-3$, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, direct
expenses and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $89,500.00.
Engineering Services, (hourly rates
including labor plus overhead at
135%) , not to exceed $ 75,328.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 6,639.00
Fixed Profit 7,533.00
TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $ 89,500.00
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not
result in excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/Don E. Smith /s/Ronald B. Hoestere
Don Smith Ronald B. oesterey
Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
�...✓ Is/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"M" AGENDA ITEM #11( 1 ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "M"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-76
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL �„✓
ERVI E A REEMENT WITH LEE AND R
CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN AND
N T U N SERVICES RE JOB N . P1-3
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH LEE AND RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE PRIMARY CLARIFIERS
NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT
NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with
Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for design and construction services required
for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. PI-33; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 provided for additional services to include
modifications to the waste sidestream pump station; revision to the polymer
dosing system; inclusion of an Orange County Water District drain line; and
relocation of the digester cleaning beds and associated piping; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with
Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers to provide for additional design services for
relocation of effluent junction box and polymer facility, realignment of Fuentes
Road, and modifications to the equipment and scum trough hatches on the primary
clarifiers; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on June 14,
1989, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said
services, in accordance with established procedures for selection of
professional engineering and architectural services.
"N-1" AGENDA ITEM N11( 1 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1"
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
�+d Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated July 12, 1989, to that certain
Professional Services Agreement dated January 13, 1988, by and between County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Lee and Ro
Consulting Engineers, for design and construction services required for Primary
Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-33, providing for additional design services for relocation of effluent
junction box and polymer facility, realignment of Fuentes Road, and.
modifications to- the equipment and scum trough hatches on the primary
clarifiers, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount
not to exceed $89,500.00, as follows, increasing the total authorized
compensation from $975,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $1,064,500.00:
Professional Services, at hourly
rates for labor, plus overhead
at 135%, not to exceed $ 75,328.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 6,639.00
Fixed Profit 7,533.00
TOTAL Addendum No. 2, not to exceed $ 89,500.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in farm approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1989.
"N-2" AGENDA ITEM #11( j ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 i
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 `..�
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: S. A. Healy Co. DATE July
JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NO. Pl-35-1
Amount of this Change Order (AdQ (Deduct) $(248,380.00)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 DELETION OF BID ITEM NO. 4 - DIGESTER CLEANING
The Contractor negotiated with the Districts to delete Bid Item No. 4 (cleaning of
Digesters 7 and 8) subject to item 2 below. It became apparent that this
specialized cleaning and disposal of digested sludge could best be done by a
separate contract. The bid documents estimated 6,000 cubic yards of sludge at
$49.73 per cubic yard.
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(298,380.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 CONTRACTOR SUPPORT FOR DISTRICTS' DIGESTER CLEANING CONTRACTOR
It is agreed that the Contractor will cooperate and provide working space, ingress
and egress, provide operating and other support as required for the Districts'
outside contractor doing the digester cleaning work. Additional compensation for
S. A. Healy has been negotiated at $50,000.00 and 90 calendar days.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 50,000.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 90 Calendar Days
TOTAL DEDUCTED AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(248,380.00)
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 90 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 90 days extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
110-11, AGENDA ITEM #11(k)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-11,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: S. A. Healy Co. DATE July 12, 1989
JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1
JOB NO.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date April 25, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date December 20, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. - 90 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 90 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 330 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date March 20, 1990
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 2,530,072.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00
This Change (AdQ (Deduct) $ 8-0
Amended Contract Price $ 2,2
Board Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMM5NDED BY:
f -1 ).
/l - I
onstruction Manager ate
ACCEPTED BY: :APPZROV ,BY:
S. A. HEALY CO.
Contractor ate er Date
"0-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(k) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-21,
RESOLUTION NO. 89-77
AWARDING JOB NO. P1-35-1-1
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CLEANING OF DIGESTERS 7
AND 8 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-35-1-1
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. In accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Boards of
Directors, on January 11, 1989, authorized filing a Notice of Exemption for .
Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and 8 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1, which
includes Cleaning of Digesters 7 and 8 at Plant No. 1, Job No. PS-35-1-1; and,
Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of
contract be made to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. for Cleaning of Digesters 7 and 8
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1-1, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for
said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That the contract for Cleaning of Digesters 7 and 8 at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1-1, be awarded to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in the total
amount of $171,000.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices
contained therein; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in form approved by the General Counsel ; and,
Section S. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1989.
11P-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
June 20, 1989
11:00 a.m. IOSA4 zure Avzxuz
NO ADDENDA zaeaxe,zr
FOUNTAIN vALLEa.uuw W lm 92128.0127
au.zez-z4n
BID TABULATION
SHEET
JOB NO. P1-35-1-1
PROJECT TITLE Cleaning of Digesters 7 and 8
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Removal and disposal of 2,500 cubic yards of grit
from Digesters 7 and 8
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 200,000 BUDGET AMOUNT t 300 000* .
*Included in Jo o. P1-35-1
==e=====___
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
.......___...._...___________e=====____.......=__=====e======_====a»====_
1. Dorado Enterprises, Signal Hill , CA $171,000.00
2. Biosystems Management International
South San Francisco, CA $540,000.00
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the
low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Dorado
Enterprises, Inc. in the bid amount of $171,000.00 as the lowest and best bid.
i i_.
,/
I
homas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
"P-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 i
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �✓
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE July
JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO.
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (9edust) $ 56,157.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - NEW PIPE TRENCH AND MODIFICATIONS TO CHLORINE SOLUTION PIPING
The contract drawings indicated that the new 10-inch chlorine solution line was to
be installed in an existing round pipe chase under the existing chlorine station
loading dock. However, the new piping could not be installed in the existing pipe
chase as there was not enough space to fit the new piping in with the existing
piping. The new pipe trench was constructed to provide a means to install the new
solution piping at the chlorination station. Minor piping changes were necessary
to conform to the location of the new trench. This item was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B Provisons.
(Reference PCH 011)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 23,122.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - ADDITIONAL EXCAVATION - NEW RAW SEWAGE POWER BUILDING
The Contractor laid out and excavated the site of the new Raw Sewage Power
Building in accordance with the contract drawings. During the final stages of the
excavation work the Contractor uncovered an existing 12 KV electrical ductbank
that 'was not shown within the site of the new building. The Contractor was
required to uncover all of the interfering portion of the ductbank and to extend
the balance of the excavation to permit the relocation of the structure to avoid
the conflict with the existing ductbank. This item was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)8 of the General
Provisons. (Reference PCH 012)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,166.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
110-11, AGENDA ITEM #110 ) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-11,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE July
JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-3
Item 3 - REMOVAL OF UNUSED AND INTERFERING WALL FITTINGS - DIGESTERS "A" AND "B"
According to the contract drawings, the existing overflow boxes and associated
piping at Digesters "A" and "B" were to be removed and replaced utilizing existing
wall fittings. Many of the existing wall fittings could not be re-used as they
were not in positions that would permit their re-connection to new piping. These
fittings were removed to permit the installation of new wall fittings along with
those that interfered with the installation of new piping and that were abandoned
with no intention of re-use. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisons. (Reference PCH
018)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 29,363.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - ADDITIONAL DOME LINER VENTS - DIGESTERS "A" AND "B"
Stainless steel piping placed vertically in the new concrete domes provide for a
means to vent the space created between 'the new concrete dome and the new PVC dome
liner and were located in positions to provide proper venting. Staff requested
that the Contractor install additional stainless steel vents at the uppermost
portion of the new domes to permit monitoring of the atmosphere between the new
dome and new liner for the purpose of leak detection. This item was accomplished
by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General
Provisons. (Reference PCH 026)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 506.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 56,157.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days'
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
"Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #110 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "Q-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 ,
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �..�
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE July 12, 1989
JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
PLANT
SUMMARY OF DIGESTER MILESTONE TIME
Original Activity Start Date November 2, 1988
Original Activity Duration Time 300 Calendar Days
Original Activity Completion Date August 28, 1988
Adjustment Milestone Time This Change Order 0 Calendar Days
Total Adjustment Milestone Time 6 Calendar Days
Revised Activity Duration 306 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Date September 3, 1989
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date November 2, 1988
Original Contract Time 425 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date December 31, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time No Change
Revised Final Completion Due Date No Change
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 5 395 00000
Prev. Auth.i Changes .
s Change (Add) 00
This (Se4w") $-56'137.O6-
Amended Contract Price $ 5,5 4,848.0
"0-3" AGENDA ITEM #11( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE July 12, 1989
JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO.
Board Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
Y/ 6_ -2-97
ojuct ion Manager Date
ZIEBARTH AND ALPER
ACCEPTED BY: APPROV BY: fir'
ontrac or Date r6i c`€ toror of Engineering Date
"Q-4" AGENDA ITEM #110 ) - ALL DISTRICTS ^p-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 ,
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 `..�.
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: Hekimian & Associates DATE July
JOB: Under round Tank Replacement at Plant No. 1 S ecification No. R-027-1
n ergroun an ep acemen at ant o. pec ca ion NO.
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (8eduet) $ 6,320.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 OIL TANK HEATER AT PLANT NO. 1
The Contractor was directed to delete the used crank case oil heater which was to
be installed at the blower building located at Plant No. 1. It was decided that
the heater was no longer needed.- This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. '
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 953.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 USE OF EXISTING CONCRETE TIE-DOWN SLAB AT PLANT NO. 2
The contract required that a new concrete tie-down slab be installed for the new
tank installation at Plant No. 2 Turbine Building. The existing concrete tie-down
slab was found to be in excellent condition after the excavation and removal of
the old tank. The Contractor was directed to eliminate the new concrete and
remove the existing concrete. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons.
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 5,640.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 3 REMOVAL OF ABANDONED CONCRETE ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AT PLANT NO. 1
During excavation and removal of the old tanks at Plant No. 1, the Contractor
encountered undisclosed abandoned concrete encased electrical ducts. The
Contractor was directed to remove the existing concrete encasement not shown on
the plans. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisons.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 824.00 l..✓
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"R-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(m) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
�...� FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: Hekimian & Associates DATE July 12, 1989
JOB: Under round Tank Re lacement at Plant No. 1 S ecification No. R-027-1
n ergroun an ep acement at an o. peci ication No.
Item 4 ADDITIONAL FIBERGLASS MANWAYS AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2
The Contractor was directed to install an additional manway on six fiberglass
tanks; 3 at Plant No. 1 at a cost of $4,237.50, and 3 at Plant No. 2 at a cost of
$4,237.50. The manways are needed to provide maintenance access to the tanks.
This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of
the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,475.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 REMOVAL OF SLUDGE IN DIESEL STORAGE TANKS AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2
The Contractor was directed to remove sludge from the five 15,000-gallon diesel
storage tanks, two at Plant No. 1 and three at Plant No. 2. An average of 600
gallons of sludge was left in each tank after the diesel fuel was removed. This
is a toxic waste which must be disposed of at a toxic waste dump site. It was
agreed to have the tank cleaning crews remove and dispose of this material . This
item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the
General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,050.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 6 CUTTING AND REPLACING ADDITIONAL REINFORCEMENT OF STEEL PLANT NO. 1
The Contractor encountered additional undisclosed mats of reinforcing steel which
extended into the invert concrete slab. The contract documents indicated one
layer or mat of reinforcing steel in each face of the slab which the Contractor
was required to cut through. The additional undisclosed reinforcing steel caused
additional work. This item was negotiated on a lump sum basis .with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,735.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"R-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(m)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: Hekimian 8 Associates DATE July 1 ,, 1989
JOB: Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. 1 S ecification No. R-027-1
--Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. pec fication No. R-027-2
Item 7 YEEDER-ROOT SYSTEMS AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2
The Veeder-Root system needed a separate conduit dedicated for each metering and
detection unit. The separate circuit was needed to eliminate electrical
interference from the sensitive electrical equipment. This conduit was not shown
in the contract documents. The Contractor was directed to provide this separate
conduit. Approximately 360 feet of 1-inch pre-coated conduit and fittings were
required to install the additional circuits at the following locations: the
Turbine Building and Truck Nash Facility at Plant No. 2 for a cost of $3,827.34,
and the Auto Shop at Plant No. 1 for a cost of $1,913.66. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,741.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 9 Calendar Days
Item 8 METHANOL COMPATABILITY AT PLANT NO. 2
At the new diesel fuel dispenser area the Contractor was directed to install the
stainless steel piping and fiberglass containment piping along with the necessary
electrical conduit so that in the future only a fuel tank and dispenser would be
needed to intall a methanol fueling system. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,088.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
Item 9 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2
The contract specified a $150.00 per day liquidated damages for late completion of
the contract work. The completion date of February 25, 1989 is being extended to
March 9, 1989 for completion of the work per this change order. The Contractor
completed work on May 8, 1989. Therefore, liquidated damages in the amount of
$150.00 per day for 60 days are assessed for the period between March 9, 1989 and
May 8, 1989.
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 9,000.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days `
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 6,320.00 �a•✓
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 12 Calendar Days
"R-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(m) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: Hekimian & Associates DATE July 2, 989
JOB: Under round Tank Re lacement at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-027-1
n ergroun Tan Rep acement at Plant No. pecification No. R-027-2
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 12 days' extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date August 30, 1988
Original Contract Time 180 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date February 25, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 12 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 12 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 192 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date March 9, 1989
Actual Final Completion Date May 8, 1989
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages 60 Calendar Days
Original Contract Price $ 877 459.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 95,459.00)
This Change (Add) Wedust:) $ 6,320.00
Amended Contract Price $ 20.DO
sae/
"R-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(m) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: Hekimian & Associates, Inc. DATE July
JOB: Under round Tank Re lacement at Plant No. 1 S ecification No. R-027-1
Undergroun ank ep acemen at ant No. SDeci ica ion No. -
Board Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECO NDED.BBY:�
o structio manager ate
Hekimian & Associates, Inc.
7
C PTED / C} APP Y:
�Qo4, 2
ontrac or ate rec or o ngineering ate
"R-5" AGENDA ITEM #11(m) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-5"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2
P. O.. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
�i FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: Hekimian 6 Associates DATE July 1
JOB: Under round Tank Re lacement at Plant No. 1 Specification No. R-027-1
Undergroun Tank Replacement at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-027-
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct:) $ 60,921.12
In .accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD:
Change in
Item Quantity
No. Unit Description From Too Difference
4 TON Contaminated Sail 100 301.52 201.52@ $ 156.00 = $ 31,437.12
9 TON Contaminated Sail 100 289.0 189.00@ 156.00 - 29,484.00
TOTAL - $ 60,921.12
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 60,921.12
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
"S-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(m) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-1"
L
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: Hekimian & Associates DATE July 1 ,, 1988
JOB: Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. 1 S ecification No. R-027-1
Underground Tank Replacement a Plant No. , Specification No. -027-2
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date August 30, 1988
Original Contract Time 180 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date February 25, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 12 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 192 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date March 9, 1989
Actual Final Completion Date May 8, 1989
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages 60 Calendar Days
Original Contract Price $ 877,459.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 89,139.00
This Change (Add) (Bedue4) $ 60, 21.12
Amended Contract Price $ 49� 241.12
Board Authorization Date: .July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMf�NDED BY-,
Construction Manager Date
Hekimian & Associates, Inc.
A EPTED BY J APP OV BY: -
^ 1 contractor Date Director of Engineering Date
"S-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(m)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-78
ACCEPTING SPECIFICATION NOS. R-027-1
AND R- 27-2 AS OMPLET
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
UNDERGROUND TANK REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NO. 1,
SPECIFICATION NO. R-027-1, AND UNDERGROUND TANK
REPLACEMENT AT PLANT NO. 2, SPECIFICATION NO. R-027-2,
AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That, except as set forth in Section 5 hereof, the contractor,
Hekimian & Associates, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with
the terms of the contract for Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. 1,
Specification No. R-027-1, and Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. 2,
Specification No. R-027-2, on May 8, 1989; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract, except as set forth in Section 5 hereof, which said
recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. 1,
Specification No. R-027-1, and Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. 2,
Specification No. R-027-2, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with
the terns of the contract therefor, dated August 30, 1988, except as set forth
in Section 5 hereof; and,
Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Hekimian & Associates,
Inc. , setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Underground Tank
"T-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(m) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-1"
Replacement at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-027-1, and Underground Tank
Replacement at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-027-2, and assessing the
contractor for liquidated damages for 60 days from March 9, 1989, the
contractual completion date, to May 8, 1989, the actual date of completion of
work by the contractor, in the amount of $150.00 per day, for the total amount
of $9,000.00, as provided in the plans and specifications for said contract, is
hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1989.
i
"T-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(m) (3) ALL DISTRICTS "T-2"
PETITION FM ANNEXATION
Date: April 19, 1989
TO: Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 2
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
I (We), the undersigned landowmer(s), do hereby request that proceedings be
taken to annex 5 acres (Gross - to nearest hundredth) of territory to
the District located in the vicinity of Timkin Lane and Coyote Lane
(Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description)
in the city of Anaheim , more particularly
(Indicate city or unincorporated territory)
described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and W enclosed herewith which
has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The
street address of the property is: 360 Coyote Lane, Anaheim 92806
The reason for the proposed annexation is: to provide City of Anaheim
public sewer service to entire street (Coyote Lane) .
Said property is XX Inhabited / Uninhabited. Number of registered voters,
if any: 14 ' The assessed value of the property is: $ 1, 800 , 000 . 00
Also enclosed are the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL WESTIONMATRE repaired ov t.')a
Lxal Agency Formation Commission (and an Lhviron. tal Impact Report, if
appropriate) and a check in the amount of $500.00 represanting payment of the
DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE.
Notices and cpmm nications relative to this proposal for annexation should be
sent to the following:
Gary Appel
Attorney at Law Herbert Brohn
civic center F . W. 3T=Oyote Lane
an a Ana, Anaheim, CA 92808
.a,-- - -UM Tale: 714-637-0865
SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER
X Please See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference .
Name (roped or printed)
\� X
or printer)
"U-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(p) - DISTRICT 2 "U-1"
EXHIBIT 'A' t /
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
SIGNATURES
Signature of Landowner Date Address
AP # 356-101-12
Tax Rat/eI Code C 010..13
X L7414 : v 7 " IV 89 340 S. Coyote Lane
A exander Wilk Anaheim, CA 92808
AP 0 356-101-14
Tax Rate Code 010,3�3 1
350 S. Coyote Lane
ay rd Z. aeissling Anaheim, CA 92808
- 4-! 350 S. Coyote Lane
Alice L. Weissling 7 Anahiem, CA 92808
AP # 356-101-16
Tax Rate Code 01013
X 341 S.. Coyote Lane
Steven Cooper Anaheim, CA 92808
AP # 356-101-19
Tax Rate Code 0101/33^ C 345 S. Coyote Lane
Michael JU Shanks Anaheim, CA 9280E
(2" Q Z-A .� 4-;'0- 345 S. Coyote Lane
Carol J. ShAnks Anaheim, CA 92808
y 2Z- 81 345 S. Coyote Lane
Edward A. O'Connor,
Trustee Anaheim, CA 92808
. . X ...s.. •//,[ M•��i+��— y- =� �� 345 S. Coyote 1
nnie A. O'Connor, Trustee Anaheim, CA 92
-1-
"U-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(p) - DISTRICT 2 "U-2"
EXHIBIT 'A'
�..✓ Page 2
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
SIGNATURES (continued)
AP @ 356-101-20
Tax Rate Code 01013
X . ` fLtV1j6q 355 S. Coyote Lane
George B. Winter I q Anaheim, CA 92808
X 355 S. Coyote Lane
Mary E�IInter Anaheim, CA 92808
AP $ 356-101-21
Tax Rate Code 01013
X�� .� �7-Pa1 356 S. Coyote Lane
Ron/ald 'R. All rso Anaheim, CA 92808
X Y y� O�'�OV� 356 S. Coyote Lane
Gail L. Alderson Anaheim, CA 92808
AP / 356-101-22
Tax Rate Code 01013
X JI<-f XI�'1 � / ' ' "Y ' " `l - 360 S. Coyote Lane
er ert B. Brohn G Anaheim, CA 92808
X �� ! / 360 S. Coyote Lane
J th E. Brohn Anaheim, CA 92808
"U-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(P) - DISTRICT 2 "U-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-97-2
AUTHORIZING INITITATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND
FILING OF APPLICATION TO LAFCO RE ANNEXATION
OF TERRITORY TO DISTRICT 0. 2ANN XAT N -
Nr-F9_- BROHNANNEXATION)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION
OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT OF TERRITORY
KNOWN AS ANNEXATION NO. 69 - BROWN ANNEXATION
TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That proceedings are hereby authorized to be initiated by
District No. 2, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orangg County is
hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory designated
as "Annexation No. 69 - Brohn Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 211,
the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on
Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this
resolution, according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in this
resolution in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985; and,
Section 2. That this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000
of the California Government Code; and,
Section 3. That this application is for the purpose of annexing
approximately 4.76 acres of territory to District No. 2 in the vicinity of
Timkin Lane and Coyote Lane in the City of Anaheim, to provide sanitary sewer '
"V-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(p) - DISTRICT 2 "V-1"
service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public
agency, as requested by Herbert B. Brohn, Judith E. Brohn, Ronald K. Alderson,
Gail L. Alderson, George B. Winter, Mary E. Winter, Edward A. O'Connor, Jennie
A. O'Connor, Maynard L. Weissling, Alice L. Weissling, Michael J. Shanks, Carol
J. Shanks, Alexander Wilk and Steven Cooper, owners of said property; and,
Section 4. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and,
Section 5. That this proposal is consistent with the adopted sphere of
influence of the affected District; and,
Section 6. That proposed Annexation No. 69 - Brohn Annexation shall be
subject to the condition that all fees required to be paid to the District must
be satisfied prior to completion of the annexation proceedings; and,
Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99.1 of
the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax all6cation
exchange with other affected taxing agencies.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1989.
"V-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(D) - DISTRICT 2 "V-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2,
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Six (6)
CONTRACTOR: Mladen Buntich Construction Company DATE July 12, 89
JOB: MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE (VAULT) REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS
LOCATIONS, CONTRACT—NO. - 8 -
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduet) $ 19,627.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 SANDBLASTING AND APPLICATION OF COAL TAR EPDXY TO 47 MANHOLE FRAMES AND
COVERS
The Contractor was directed to sandblast and apply coal tar epoxy to 47 manhole
frames and covers. It was determined to be in the best interests of the District
to coat the inside exposed surfaces of the new frames and covers in an effort to
reduce the corrosion caused by the sewer gases. It is estimated that the coating
will prolong the life of the frames and covers a minimum of 10 years and will
reduce maintenance costs. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-60) (2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 19,627.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 19,527.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
"W-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(q) - DISTRICT 3 "W-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92798
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Six (6)
CONTRACTOR: Mladen Buntich Construction Company DATE July 12, 1989
JOB: MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE (VAULT) REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS
LOCATIONS, CONTRACi NU. J-ZUK-i
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date July 9, 1987
Original Contract Time 750 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date July 27, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 38 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 788 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date September 3, 1989
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 4 327 000.00
Prey. Auth. Changes $ -
This Change (Add) Wedue% $ 19.627.00
Amended Contract Price $ , 5 4-
Board Authorization Date: July 12, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
O sC Ti truction manager Uate
MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
ACCEPTED BY: APPR
on ractor Uate Engine0ling Dati
"W-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(q) - DISTRICT 3 "W-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX LIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIACALIFORNI2708-70127
4� 10806 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. ALIFORNIA 8270&7018
(716)982-2611
June 27, 1989
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 7
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Engineering Services
with Church Engineering, Inc. in Connection with Campus Relief Sewer,
Contract No. 7-13
In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Committee has .negotiated the following .
fee with Church Engineering, Inc. for the design of Campus Relief Sewer, on an
hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus subconsultants, direct
expenses and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $43,480.00.
Engineering Services, (hourly rates
including labor plus overhead
at 140%) , not to exceed $ 32,000.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 1,000.00
Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 7,280.00
Fixed Profit 3,200.00
TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $ 43,480.00
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee
as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not
result in excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/Don E. Smith /s/Richard B. Edgar
Don h R chard B. E gar
Chairman Chairman pro tem
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes v
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"X" AGENDA ITEM #11(u)(1) - DISTRICT 7 "X"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-99-7
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH HUR ENGINEERING, I FOR DESIGN AND
TRU TIN btXV1Ub ft WNINALIN . 7-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH ENGINEERING,
INC. FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTIONS SERVICES
REQUIRED RE CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER, FROM
VON KARMAN AVENUE TO JAMBOREE BOULEVARD,
CONTRACT NO. 7-13
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy
establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and
architectural services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with
Church Engineering, inc. for design and construction services required re Campus
Relief Sewer, from Von Karmen Avenue to Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on June 14,
1989, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has
certified the final negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County, California,
DOES, HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated
July 12, 1989, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and Church
Engineering, Inc. , for design and construction services required re Campus
Relief Sewer, from Von Karmen Avenue to Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13,
is. hereby approved and accepted; and,
"Y-1" AGENDA. ITEM #11(u)(2) - DISTRICT 7 "Y-1"
Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in
accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows:
Professional Services, at hourly
rates for labor plus overhead
at 140%, not to exceed $ 32,000.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 1,000.00
Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 7,280.00
Fixed Profit 3,200.00
TOTAL, not to exceed $ 43,480.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1989.
"Y-2" AGENDA ITEM N11(u) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "Y-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-100-7
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
TO ADJU T MANHOLE COVERS ON DISTRICT SEWERS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY
OF ORANGE TO ADJUST MANHOLE COVERS AND CLEAN-OUTS
ON DISTRICT SEWERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
COUNTY'S 1988-89 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM IN
UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AREAS WITHIN DISTRICT NO. 7
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated July 12, 1989, by and between
County Sanitation District No. 7 and the County of Orange, providing for the
adjustment of manhole covers and clean-outs on District sewers by the County in
conjunction with their 1988-89 street resurfacing program in unincorporated
County areas within District No. 7, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for the actual cost of adjusting the manhole
covers, plus 10% for inspection and administration costs, not to exceed $220.00,
nor be less than $155.00, per manhole for approximately 279 manholes, and for
clean-outs, not to exceed $176 per clean-out nor be less than $125 per
clean-out, is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions of said
Agreement; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Agreement in farm approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 9, 1987.
"Z" AGENDA ITEM #11(v) - DISTRICT 7 "Z"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-79
AWARDING JOB NO. P1-34-2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2
k k k k k ! k k k k k k k k k
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which
Is a portion of the previously-approved Master Plan Report for the Joint
Treatment Works. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan
approval . In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Joint Treatment
Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report covering this project
was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 10, 1985; and,
Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of
contract be made to Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc.
for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, and
bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That the contract for Sludge Handling Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, be awarded to Advanco Constructors,
Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. in the total amount of $19,085,600.00 in
accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
"AA-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "AA-1"
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in form approved by the General Counsel ; and,
Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1989.
"AA-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "AA-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
May 23, 1969 BI ORANGE COUN". CAUFORNIA
11:00 a.m. 1BBAA EWB AVENUE I
ONE ADDENDUM VO.BOX 0127
MW WN VAI ..MFOWA 827E
B I D TABU L A T I ON 9141982211
SHEET
JOB NO. P1-34-2
PROJECT TITLE Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION New Truck Loading Facility, Sludge Transfer System,
Plant Water Pump Station, and 12 KY Service Center
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 22.4 Million BUDGET AMOUNT $ 24.0 Million
===even=========eN===a=N==........ _________
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Advanco Constructors, Div. of $19,085,600.00
Zurn Constructors, Inc., Upland, CA
2. Brinderson Corporation, Irvine, CA $19,730,000.00
3. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. $19,800,000.00
Camarillo CA
4. Steve P. Rados, Inc. , Santa Ana, CA $20,686,289.00
5. Kiewit Pacific Co. , Santa Fe Springs, CA $20,882,000.00
6. S. A. Healy Co. , Azusa, CA $23,691,524.00
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the
low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Advanco
Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. in the bid amount of
$19,085,600.00 as the lowest and best biddlo�-
h�,I\/\�\I .-�M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
"AA-3" AGENDA ITEM #13(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "AA-3"
RESOLUTION NO.
CREATING COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.
CAPITAL FACILITIES FUND AND TERMINATING
THE ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND AND
HE FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, CREATING A
CAPITAL FACILITIES FUND AND TERMINATING
THE ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND AND
THE FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND
f f t t f f f t t t f f t !
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ has
heretofore established the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund and the Facilities
Revolving Fund; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors now wish to create a Capital Facilities
Fund which will contain the combined funds formerly deposited in the Accumulated
Capital Outlay Fund and the Facilities Revolving Fund.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. _ of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That there is hereby established the Capital Facilities Fund of
County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California.
Section 2. That all funds currently deposited in the Accumulated Capital
Outlay Fund and the Facilities Revolving Fund shall be transferred to the
Capital Facilities Fund.
Section 3. That all funds that would have been deposited in the
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund or the Facilities Revolving Fund when collected
shall , hereafter, be deposited in the Capital Facilities Fund.
Section 4. That the Capital Facilities Fund shall be used only for the
"BB-1" AGENDA ITEM #17(b) (1) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "BB-I"
acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of sewerage
facilities; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments issued for the `..✓
construction or reconstruction of such water systems and sanitary or sewerage
facilities and to repay federal or state loans or advances made to such entity
for the construction or reconstruction of water systems and sanitary or sewerage
facilities; and other purposes described in Sections 5471 and 5474.9 of the
California Health and Safety Code, and Section 53731 of the Government Code.
Section 5: That upon transfer of funds from the Accumulated Capital Outlay
Fund and the Facilities Revolving Fund to the Capital Facilities Fund, the
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund and the Facilities Revolving Fund shall
terminate.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1989.
"BB-2" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(1) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "BB-2"
RESOLUTION NO.
�.✓ ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1 FOR THE DISTRICT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF I ION 9
OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNM NT CODE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE PROM IS SON OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as
proposed by the Initiative Measure approved by the people at the special
statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual
appropriations subject to limitation of each local government shall not exceed
the appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year adjusted for changes
in the cost of living and population except as otherwise specifically provided
for in said Article; and,
WHEREAS, the State Legislature added Division 9 (commencing with Section
7900) to Title 1 of the Government Cade of the State of California to implement
Article XIII B of the California Constitution; and,
WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the
governing body of each local jurisdiction shall , by resolution, establish its
appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at
a regularly-scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting and that fifteen (15)
days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the determination of the
appropriations limit shall be available to the public; and,
WHEREAS, Section 7902 (a) of the Government Code sets forth the method for
determining the appropriations limit for each local jurisdiction for the
1989-90 fiscal year; and,
WHEREAS,. the Board of Directors wish to establish the appropriations limit
"CC-1" AGENDA ITEM #17(b) (1) ( 1 ) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 "CC-1"
for fiscal year 1989-90 for the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That it is hereby found and determined that the documentation
used in the determination of the appropriations limit for County Sanitation
District No. of Orange County, California, for fiscal year 1989-90, was
available to the public in the Finance Department of said District at least
fifteen (15) days prior to this date.
Section 2: That the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1989-90 for
County Sanitation District No._ of Orange County, California, as established in
accordance with Section 7902(a) of the California Government Code is $
which sum is within the maximum authorized spending limitation for fiscal
year 1989-90.
Section 3: The determination of the appropriation limit is based upon the
best and most complete information available at this time. The District
reserves the right to review and re-establish a new and different limit in the
event that It subsequently determines that a modification of the limitation
amount is appropriate.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1989.
"CC-2" AGENDA ITEM #17(b) (1) ( 1 ) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 "CC-2"
• E COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
Al ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
June 29, 1989 106AA ELUS AVENUE
PO.5"6122
FOONTAN VGUEV,CAUFORNIA 92)2664)
O1M2624C11
STAFF REPORT
AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY ASSESSOR
RE
SUPPLEMENTAL USER FEE PROCESSING
BACKGROUND
The Assessor' s Office and the Sanitation Districts have worked cooperatively
since 1981 to process the Districts' supplemental user fees as a separate line
Item on the annual property tax bill. The Assessor's property data base has
been used by the Districts to calculate and assess the annual supplemental sewer
user fee. However, in late 1988 we were advised that that relationship would
need to change and have been working with the Assessor's Office to devise a new
approach.
As a result of these efforts we have developed, with the help of an outside
consultant, a new system that would allow the Districts to continue to use the
property tax bill to collect annual supplemental sewer use fees. A series of
programs, the first of which would run against the Assessor' s data base, under
the control of the Assessor's Office, and the remainder of which will run at the
County Data Center will accomplish this task. The Boards have already approved
a tentative agreement with the GSA allowing use of the Data Center. ,
STATUS
The data extraction program has been reviewed by the Assessor's Office and has
been approved for use with their data base. Testing is currently underway using
the Assessor' s preliminary production tax roll . All programs are expected to be
operational by mid-July when the roll is certified.
The County Data Center and the Assessor's Office have been working closely with
the staff and consultants during the project without formalized agreements. The
tentative agreement with the GSA for Data Center use has been put on hold at the
County pending an agreement with the Assessor's Office.
During the past year the Assessor has implemented a new computerized system to
produce the roll. (This is one of the reasons the Districts have had to develop
new programs.) As sometimes happens, the implementation of a new system has
required extra effort and temporarily increased the Assessor's workload. For
these reasons they have not had the opportunity to work out a formal agreement
with staff. The Assessor's staff has however, assured us they will cooperate,
will allow us to acquire the data base, and will execute an agreement for their
services.
ANNUAL COST
The price of the Assessor's data base services for agencies such as the
Sanitation Districts has yet to be determined but we have been advised that it
will be set by the Board of Supervisors in mid-July. In past years the
�.,.i Assessor' s Office has provided us with the needed information for the equivalent
of $.16 per parcel . They have also done all the data processing and have billed
us at their cost.
"DD-1" AGENDA ITEM #18(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "DD-1"
During preliminary discussions the Assessor has indicated that the price for the
data base information this year could range between $2.00 and $2.50 per parcel . '
Based on the mid point of that range and the number of parcels on the 1988-89
roll the annual cost per District, if all Districts had supplemental user fees,
would be:
Assessor's Data Base Services Charge
District Past Years 1989 and Future Years
1 $ 51800 $ 81.000
2 (implement in 1990) 22,700 319,000
3 (implement in 1989) 27,700 389,000
5 3,200 45,000
6 3,900 55,000
7 (implement in 1991) 6,500 92,000
11 5,700 80,000
13 700 9,000
14 N/A N/A
Total T1,0 00,00
We have always been more than willing to pay whatever costs are incurred for
providing the Districts with the needed data and any extra effort required of
the Assessor's staff to provide that data. Although it appears as if the
Assessor's cost for providing data base services to enable the Districts to
calculate, assess and collect the supplemental sewer user fees or the annual
property tax bill will increase substantially, the Districts really have no
choice. Any alternative method would cost significantly more.
It is our understanding that whatever price the Assessor and the Board of
Supervisors set, it must be based upon the incremental cost and must be the
same for all users. Staff has also requested that the Assessor's use of
District-developed data extraction software for other users be considered during
price setting. The Assessor has estimated that the certified roll and the rate
per parcel will both be available in mid-July. At that time the Assessor and
the GSA will want to formalize our agreements.
RECOMMENDATION
Implementation of the Assessor's new data base system and the change in
provisions for continuing to provide the Districts with data base extraction
services have placed the procedural arrangements and processing on a very tight
time schedule. In all likelihood it will be necessary to execute the required
contractual arrangements with the Assessor prior to the Boards' next regular
meeting on August 9th.
Staff therefore recommends the Board of Directors authorize the General Manager
to negotiate and execute an agreement with the Orange County Assessor for the
acquisition of the Assessor's property file data base, or for the lease of such
data, and services necessary to calculate, assess and collect supplemental sewer
use fees and to place them on the annual property tax bill for collection. ,
"DD-2" AGENDA ITEM #18(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "DD-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-98
AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 14-1-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 6, 7 AND
14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, FROM
BRISTOL STREET TO FAIRVIEW ROAD, CONTRACT
NO. 14-1-1B (AND CITY OF COSTA MESA STREET
IMPROVEMENTS)
* k * k k * * k * * k k * k
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of
Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which
is a portion of the previously-approved Environmental Impact Report for Proposed
Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization
No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13. In accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090
of the Districts' Guidelines, the Environmental Impact Report covering this
project was approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors on July 24, 1985;
and,
Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of
contract be made to Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for Baker-Gisler Interceptor,
from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B, and bid tabulation
and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed;
and,
Section 3. That the contract for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol
Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-18, (and City of Costa Mesa street
"EE-I" AGENDA ITEM #33(b) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "EE-1"
C
improvements) be awarded to Steve Bubalo Construction Co. in the total amount of
$5,345,523.30 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained
therein; and,
Section 4. That the cost of said contract is to be allocated as follows:
County Sanitation Dist. No. 6 .... $ 25,000.00
County Sanitation Dist. No. 7 .... 1,177,000.00
County Sanitation Dist. No. 14.... 3,016,441.00
Subtotal $4,218,441.00 (Contract 14-1-1B)
City of Costa Mesa................ 1,127,082.30 (Street improvements)
TOTAL $5,345,523.30
Final project costs for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to
Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B, shall be allocated proportionally in
accordance with the above; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 6, acting for
itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 7 and 14, are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work,
pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved
by the General Counsel ; and,
Section 6. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 12, 1989.
"EE-2" AGENDA ITEM #33(b) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "EE-2"
a E COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
June 20, 1989
11:00 d.m. +OEAA RUE AVENUE
\ , GO.BOX E+E)
Two Addenda
FOUNTAIN val71 CLL 82J2eA+z)
n+Aisazx.241,n
B I D T A B U L A T I O N
H E E T
CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1B
PROJECT TITLE Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construction of 81-inch sewer between Bristol Street and
Fairview Road in Baker Street, including City of Costa Mesa stree improvements
$ 6.4 million Districts
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 1.6 million Costa Mesa BUDGET AMOUNT $ 8,000,000.00
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
Districts Portion: $4,218,441.00
1. Steve Bubalo Construction Co. Costa Mesa Portion: 1,127,082.30
Monrovia, CA T5,345, 3.
Districts Portion: $4,167,161.00
2. Colich & Sons, Gardena, CA Costa Mesa Portion: 1 198 888.73
5,3 ,049.73
Districts Portion: $4,791,660.00*
3. Mladen Buntich Construction Co. Costa Mesa Portion: 1 357,895.00
Sunland, CA ,149,555.00*
Districts Portion: $4,990,735.00
4. W. H. Ebert Corporation Costa Mesa Portion: 1 189 648.80
San Jose, CA 0,1 83.
Districts Portion: $5,169,669.00
5. Simich-Masanovich (JV) Costa Mesa Portion: 1 400,000.00
Arcadia, CA 69. 0
Districts Portion: $5,403,111.00
6. K.E.C. Company, Corona, CA Costa Mesa Portion: 1 436 273.00
6,8 9,384.00
*Corrected totals.
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the
low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Steve Bubalo
Construction Co. in the bid amount of $5,348,523.30,as the lowest and best bid.
'—Thomas M. Dawe3
Director"Cr AGENDA. ITEM #33(b) DISTRICTSS 6r, 714 EE 3"
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
y ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
JUNE 149 1989
PT1lTAT)pN p
n
U N
N
pR9A'GE 1COU �
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on June 14. 1989, at 7:30 p.m.,
in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation
the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3. 5,
6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Choi loran Orma Crank
x Dan Griset, Chairman pro teo —Dan Young
=Ronald B. Hoesterey —Ursula Kennedy
a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: x A.B. 'Buck- Catlin, Chairman Chris Norby
x Nilliam D. Mahoney, Chairman pro test —Beth Graham
•� z Roland E. Bigonger —Henry W. Wedaa
z Dan Griset _Dan Young
Ron Isles x Carrey Nelson
x James Neal George Scott
x Arthur G. Newton —Carol OWney
x Bob Perry __Norman Culver
x Iry Pickier Fred Hunter
x Wayne Silzel —_James T. Fasbender
7--Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chat rean Orbrey Duke
i Carrey Nelson _Mayne Medin
x Edward L. Allen Paul Verellen
x Wes Bannister —Peter Green
x A.B. 'Buck' Catlin —Chris Norby
xNorman Culver —_Bob Perry
x '
Don R. Griffin Donna L. Chesser,
x Dan Griset —_Dan Young
z John Kanel x William D. Mahoney _Beth Graham
x James Neal __George Scott
x Iry Ptckler Fred Hunter
x J.R. 'Bob' Siefen _Dewey Miles
a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
z Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom
t Edna Wilson _Victor Grgas
DISTRICT NO. 5: x John C. Cox, Jr., Chat rean Evelyn Hart
Donald A. Strauss, Chairman pro ten x Evelyn Hart
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairmen James M. Ferryman
x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro torn —Evelyn Hart
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman _Fred Barrera
x Richard Edgar, Chairman pro two _Ursula Kennedy
x Dan Griset Dan Young
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
x Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran
Donald A. Strauss x John C. Cox. Jr.
x James Wanner _Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x 'Tam Mays, Chairman Jim Silva
x Grace Winchell, Chairman pro ten —Wes Bannister
a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Wades, Chairman _Roland E. Bigonger
x Iry Pickier, Chairman pro ten Fred Hunter
7--Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton
-7—Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
x Wayne Wedin —Ron Isles
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller
x Ursula Kennedy, Chairman pro tan —Richard B. Edgar
`.7 a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
x Sally Anne Sheridan _Larry Agran
x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
-2-
06/14/89
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Mayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P.
Anderson, William N. Clarke, Thomas /
M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle,
Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges, John Linder,
Bob Ooten, Rich von Langan, Jim Herberg,
Dan Dillon, Stasia Allen, Mahin Talebi,
Mike Deblieux
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark
Ide, Richard Marsh, Thomas Nixon, Jamel
Demir, Stephen Hough, Walt Howard, Phil
Stone, Dewey Wiles, David Jenkins, Bob •�
Finn, George A. Randall , Paul Dunning, John
Baird, Joel S. Moskowitz, Gary Stetzel ,
Bill Blodgett, James N. Williams, Yvonne
Castle, Robert C. Thomas
DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive file and acre t resi na-
tion o Mayor Lau rann Cook of the That the letter from Mayor Laurann Cook
City of Fountain valley and seating resigning from the Boards of Directors
first and second alternates to the of District Nos. 2 and 3, be, and is
Mayor hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be
seated as members of the Boards:
Districts Active Director Alternate Director
2 & 3 James Neal George Scott
DISTRICTS 3 & 6 - Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excerpts
re Board Appointments That the minute excerpts and resolutions
from the following re election of
mayors, appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards,
be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor)
Agency District(s) Active Director Alternate Director
Costa Mesa 6 James A. Wahner James M. Ferryman
Sanitary
District
Huntington 3 Wes Bannister* Peter Green
Beach
Seal Beach 3 Edna Wilson Victor Grgas*
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that the
eport of the Joint Chairman Fiscal Policy Committee was tentatively
scheduled to meet on Wednesday, June 28th,
at 5:00 p.m. /
Chairman Smith then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, �
June 28th, at 5:30 p.m., and invited Directors Wes Bannister and Roland Bigonger
to attend and participate in the discussions.
-3-
06/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the
Report of the General Manager Districts were the recipients of the
Association of Metropolitan Sewerage
Agencies' Gold Award for 1988. This award recognizes the Districts' continuous
compliance with all requirements of their National Pollutant Discharge Elmination
System (NPDES) Permit. He noted that the Districts had also received the
Environmental Protection Agency's Award of Excellence for the last two years.
Mr. Sylvester commented briefly on the upcoming workshops for Directors on the
Districts' "Action Plan" and requested that the Directors return the form
provided to them indicating whether they would be attending one of the four
workshops scheduled for the following week.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that the
eport of the General counselBoards would convene in closed session
later in the meeting concerning a matter
involving possible litigation.
Mr. Woodruff also advised that a letter of protest had been received that
afternoon relative to the award of Job No. P1-34-2, Sludge Handling Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1. Therefore, staff recommended that this matter be
removed from this agenda and deferred to the next regular Board meeting in July
in order to provide an opportunity for his office to investigate the matter.
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Smith stated that the
Deferrin consideration of award staff and General Counsel had recommended
of Job o. PS- 4-2 to Advanco that award of Job No. PI-34-2 be removed
Constructors, Inc. from the agenda and deferred to the next
regular meeting of the Boards on July 12 in
order for the General Counsel 's office to investigate and comment on a letter of
protest received relative to award of said job to Advanco Constructors, Inc.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That consideration of award of Job No. P1-34-2, Sludge Handling Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, be, and is hereby, deferred to the regular meeting of
the Boards of Directors on July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and June 1, 1989, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval o inu es to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
•r/ -4-
06/14/89
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and May 31, 1989, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and May 31, 1989, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and June 7, 1989, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratif cation of a ent o otnt
and Individua District laims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth an pages "A" and
"B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be,
and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
5/10/89 5/24189
ALL DISTRICTS
Joerating Fund - $ 752,470.45 $ 836,257.06
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 4,616,703.09 525,145.87
Joint Working Capital Fund - 186.147.44 158,233.52
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 8,550.72 6,356.25
DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 16.56
DISTRI N . - 257,299.64 36,338.50
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 374,794.43 13,024.35
DI TRIG CT NO. 5 - 25,597.78 4,244.55 '
D IST T NO. - 10,895.43 32,146.04
DISTRI— C-N17-7 - 100,294.96 26,428.67
DISTRICT NO. I1 - 1.918.21 6,585.25
DISTRI�_13 - -0- 4.08
DISTRI T NO. 14 - 69,771.56 56,258.71
DISTR —ICTS WT.-5 a 6 JOINT - 851,916.41 5,576.40
DISTRICT NOS. 6 a 7 JOINT - -0- 35.42 f
DISTRICTS NO5. 7 8 14 JOINT - 689.14 2,785.27
7,049.26 1,70 ,436.50
-5-
O6/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Award n Purc ase o Twent -5 x
our- ee lectric Cargo That the bid tabulation and
arr ersSpecification A-145 recommendation re award of Purchase of
to W. T. Dillard, Inc. Twenty-Six (26) Four-Wheel Electric
Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-145,
be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to W. T. Billard,
Inc. for the total amount of $116,220.00 plus sales tax.
• ° ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
rrdin Purchase of one 2 -Ton
ne-Mauntetl, F at Bea Truck, That the bid tabulation and
ec ication o. A-147, to Ole recommendation re award of Purchase of
Lee, nC. One 2M-Tan Crane-Mounted, Flat Bed
Truck, Specification No. A-147, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Ole Lee, Inc.
for the total amount of $39,842.00 plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue an e
Order No. 1 to Purchase uraer That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
No. 38042 issued to Continental to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase
Graphics for additional rintin Order No. 38042 issued to Continental
services re 'Action Plan° Draft Graphics for additional printing
o ection reatment and Disposal services required to print "Action Plan'
ac lities Master an Draft Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan, increasing the
total authorized amount from $41,500.00 to $49,443.70, including tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 8 to the
plans antl specifications for That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and
Job-7- specifications for Administration
Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4,
authorizing an addition of $29,180.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts
Corporation for 11 items of additional work including flagpole illumination,
substitution of aluminum expansion joint screed joints for platic screeds,
additional electrical circuitry and ventilation ducting in kitchens; additional
bathroom lighting soffits; and additional valves on HVAC system; and granting a
time extension of 12 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and
is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin hanme Order No. 1 to
the loos an s Mir for That Change Order No. 16 to the plans
Job No. J-1b and specifications- for Ocean Outfall
Booster Station °C° at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15, authorizing an addition of $36,700.00 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. for 11 items of miscellaneous additional work including
modification of locker-roan showers and restrooms for handicapped persons;
miscellaneous modifications to walkways and ladders; installation of safety
handrail at termination channel ; modification of roof slope; installation of
separate grounding for DACS computer control system and replacement of current
breakers; removal of undisclosed underground obstructions; and installation of
dryers in the air system and other miscellaneous changes; and granting a time
extension of seven calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and
is hereby, approved.
-6-
O6/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
AoorovInQan e Order o. I o e
Aans and see ca ons or That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and /
0 0. J-ZU specifications for Warehouse and
Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and `ftw
Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an addition of $30,857.00 to
the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for modifications to the water
facilities inspection trench required by the City of Fountain Valley, and removal
of unsuitable building foundation sail; and granting a time extension of
19 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby,
approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: • .
A roV n han e To
er o. 1 0
t e Tins antl s ecificat ons for That Change Order No. 18 to the plans
job mos. K-20 and P1- 1 and specifications for Headworks No. 2
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and
Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts;
and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-31, authorizing an addition of
$82,028.20 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co, for eight items of additional
work including removal of undisclosed obstructions; removal of temporary paving;
additional chlorine piping in future bar screen channels; installation of a
District-furnished influent pump; reinforcement modifications in Tunnel No. 4 at
the bar screen and pump room structures; substitution of wall panels at chlorine
area to accommodate future storage tank changes; and modification of architectural
finish to the building exterior concrete surfaces throughout, be, and is hereby,
approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aoorovinq Change Order No. 13 to
e Rians and s ecif cat ons for That Change Order No. 13 to the plans
• 00 O$. P - - 1 and specifications for Covers for
an - 4 Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job
No. PI-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and
Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A
Job No. P2-34, authorizing an addition of $98,811.72 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors. Inc. for four items of additional work including caustic pump power
modifications;' additional costs due to District-requested delays re modifications
to 'H' and "I' scrubbers to accommodate ongoing odor control operations;
improvements to the steam shunt piping system; and additional asphaltic concrete
curb and trench paving; and granting a time extension of 121 calendar days for
completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rgv,2 han a rtler No. 14 t0
he ons an see cations for That Change Order No. 14 to the plans
Ob Nos. 1- . P - - 1 and specifications for Covers for
P - antl Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and
Improvements to Grit Facility "81, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A",
Job No. P2-34, authorizing an addition of $96,311.08 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. for five items of additional work including modifications to
the Plant 1 scrubber complex drain; construction of concrete pad at diesel tank
fueling areas at Building 4 at Plant No. 1 and removal of deteriorated asphaltic
concrete paving; modifications to foul air ductwork at Headworks "C" to
accommodate the new Conveyor Building; installation of methane sensors in each o
17 primary basin dome enclosures; and rerouting of existing 10-inch digester
cleaning line around the new 48-inch foul air line, be, and is hereby, approved.
-7-
06/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A r o. to e
a c iansv nd ons for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
Jon NO. 1- 7 specifications for Entrances, Site,
security and Interior Road Improvements
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, authorizing a net addition of $26,462.14 to the
contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for eight items of miscellaneous additions and
deletions including security fencing modifications; relocation of telephone
conduit; existing manhole modifications and repairs; installation of concrete
thrust block on waste hauler drain line; installation of restroom facility for the
guard shack at the new main entrance; deletion of the Motor Control Center in the
Metering and Diversion Structure; and deletion and modification of asphalt paving,
concrete and piping at the Waste Hauler Dump Station, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin an a rder o. 2 10 he
ans an s ecifi cations for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
Jab No. VZ—JI specifications for Miscellaneous
Modifications and Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing a net addition of $33,600.00
to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for seven items of additional work including
rerouting of existing gas and water lines at new meter structure "A";
modifications to new containment facility at dewatering building; increasing ball
valve size from 6" to 8" for 20 valves for Digesters "A" and "8d; deletion of- a
new catch basin which will be incorporated into a future project; rerouting high
strength sludge piping and connections at Digesters "C', "D", "F" and "G"; and
exploratory utility location excavation of underground high strength sludge piping
system, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovssionin Addendum Noces. 4 to the
fe Proal ervi Agreement That the Selection Committee
with Brown and Caldwell Consulting certification of the final negotiated
ngineers for design of fee relative to Addendum No. 4 to the
Job NO. J-19 Professional Services Agreement with
Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers
for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for design
of a steam turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of
engine heat to produce additional electricity, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-51,
approving Addendum No. 4 to said Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting
Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead,
plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not
to exceed $68,972.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from
$3,592.838.00 to an amount not to exceed $3,661,810.00. A certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin Addendum No. to the
rofessional ervices A reement That the Boards of Directors hereby
• with Jones Stokes Associates, adopt Resolution No. 89-52, approving
Inc. for preparation of EIR for Addendum No. 2 t0 the Professional
Wastewater Treatment and Oisposa Services Agreement with Jones 8 Stokes
Element of Master Plan Programmatic Associates, Inc. for preparation of an
EIR Environmental Impact Report for the
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
Element of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan
Programmatic EIR, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories
within- said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of
$213,126.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
-8-
06/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizinq the Selection onn ee
o ne otiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is /
Professional ervices Agreement hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
with Lee antl o Consulting No. 2 to the Professional Services
Engineers re design of Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting
Job N—.Fl-J3 Engineers for design of Primary
Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, to provide for relocation of
the effluent junction box and polymer facility, realignment of Fuentes Road, and
modifications to the equipment and scum trough hatches on the primary clarifiers.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Genera Mana er to
designate members o the oar s That the General Manager be, and is
and/or staff to attend and part ci- hereby, authorized to designate members
ate in meetings hear n s of the Boards and/or staff to attend and
conferences, raci I lityinspections participate in meetings, hearings,
and other functions conferences facility inspections and
other functions which, in his opinion,
will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including,
but not limited to, those conducted by state and federal legislative and
regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies,
California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan
Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel , meals, lodging and incidental -
expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts'
policies and the approved annual budget for 1989-90.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to
execute an agreement with the That the General Manager be, and is
County of Orange for Data hereby, authorized to execute an
Processing Center services agreement with the County of Orange for
Data Processing Center services relative
to collection of the Districts' annual supplemental user fees.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing renewal of T orar
Permit far roun water eanu That renewal of Temporary Permit for
No. 1- ssued to the No. of Groundwater Cleanup No. 1-23 issued to
Orange Jahn Wayne irport the County of Orange John Wayne Airport,
extending said permit from July 11, 1989
to July 10, 1990, to allow the continued emergency discharge of contaminated
groundwater from John Wayne Airport to the District's sewer for an additional
one-year period in order to complete construction of the Michelson Bridge included
in the general airport expansion project, be; and is hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
AuthorizIn staff t0issue purchase -
orders to soils, concre a and That staff be, and is hereby, authorized .
materials testing firms for to issue purchase orders to soils,
services required for Districts' concrete and materials testing firms for
construction projects services required, beginning June 15,
1989, for the Districts' construction
projects over the next two years, as follows: �f
-9-
06/14/89
Total
Amount not
To to exceed
- Smith-Emery Company $200,000
- Twining Laboratories of 200,006
Southern California, Inc.
- H.V. Lawmaster S Company, Inc. 100,000
- Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. 50,000
- Soil and Testing Engineers, Inc. 50,000
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly reviewed the
Annual nomination for Chairman provisions of the Districts' Rules of
of the Joint Administrative Procedure relating to nomination and
Organization election of the Joint Chairman and Vice
Joint Chairman.
This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be
made for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the
Secretary then declared the nominations open.
Director Ronald B. Hoesterey was nominated as a candidate for the office of
Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization.
There being no further nominations, it was moved, seconded and duly carried that
nominations be closed. The Secretary then reported that the election would be
held at the regular July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of
Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts.
Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chairman will also be held at the
regular July meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re NPDES ocean Monitoring
Program
Receive, file and approve Reoort Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Up Recommendation for NPDES Ocean
Monitoring Program Year Five That the Report and Recommendation
(1989-90) and Selection Cormittee for NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program
Certification re Amendment No. 6 Year Five (1989-90) and Selection
to Agreement with SAIC re Committee certification of the
Soeci cation No. 5-032 negotiated fee for Amendment No. 6
to Agreement with Science Applications
International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for
Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
Aoorovina Amendment No. 6 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Acreement with SAIC re
5oecification No. 5-032 That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 89-54, approving
Amendment No. 6 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contrac-
Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Scecificaticn No. S-032,
extending the contract from July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990, for an amount nr
to exceed 51,609,570.00 for the fifth year of said ccntract. A c=_rtif`ed
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and ^,.-_ a par, of tnesa mir.aes.
_io-
06/14/89
Authorizin staff to administer a Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Port on of t e ear-Five NPDE cean
on torn Prc ram eciP cation That staff be, and is hereby,
o. - 1 o nc ude ou s de authorized to administer a Portion
con rac ua services eciflca ion of the Year Five NPDES Ocean Monitorini /
o. - -1A and S ecifica ion Program (Specification No. S-032-1),
No. - 2-18 previously performed by Science
Applications International Corporation,
for monthly and quarterly water quality sampling and analyses, semi-annual
benthic bioaccumulation sampling, quarterly data submittal and the
October 30th Annual Data Submission Report, for an estimated cost of
$180,120.00; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to incorporate
separate outside contractual services in an amount not to exceed
$130,300.00, as itemized below, for a total estimated, staff-administered
amount of $319,420.00, said work to be implemented pursuant to Districts'
staffing, equipment and project budgetary authorizations and procurement
regulations.
Receive file and a rove ro osal Moved, seconded and duly carried:
of ou ern a ifornia oasta
Water Research ProJect re ocean That the proposal of Southern
current monitoring and mo a in California Coastal Water Research
services and re arat on of a Project (SCCWRP) dated April 19,
ear-F ve ocean GurreEs e or 1989, to provide ocean current
(Specification No. -0 - A monitoring and modeling services
and the preparation of a Year-Five
Ocean Currents Report (Specification No. S-032-1A) for a total amount
not to exceed $90,300.00, be, and 1s hereby, received, ordered filed
and approved.
Receive file and a rove ro osal Moved, seconded and duly carried:
a co na sis nc. o assis
start with data hanall ng
an That the proposal of EcoAnalysis,
ggoration oP re u re uarterl Inc. dated May 24, 1989, to assist
Re orts pecif cation staff with data handling and
No. 5�J2-1 preparation of required quarterly
ODES Reports (Specification
No. S-032-18) for a total amount not to exceed $40,000.00, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive file and a rove wr t en
re or of t e xecu ve Committee That the written report of the joint
and Fiscal Pollcy Committee meeting of the Executive Committee and
the Fiscal Policy Committee held on
May 24, 1989, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file sca Po is
omm e ort re tee R 1 -90 That the Fiscal Policy Committee's
personnel requ remen s and joint report and recommendations re 1989-90
works budgets personnel requirements and joint works
operating and construction budgets, be,
and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
-11-
O6/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duty carried:
Approving 1 ersonne
requirements and amenaing That the 1989-90 personnel requirements
classification antl comoensation be, and are hereby, approved; and,
�...✓ eso u on No. - 0, as amended
' FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of
Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-55, amending Classification and
Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1989-90 personnel requirements.
A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
A rovin he 1 - o nt following roll call vote:
per,
ng Budget
AYES: Edward L. Allen, Wes Bannister, Roland E. Bigonger, A. B. "Buck" Catlin,
John C. Cox, Jr., Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Don R. Griffin,
Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, Ronald B. Hoesterey, John Kanel ,
Ursula E. Kennedy, William D. Mahoney, Tom Mays, James Neal , Carrey
J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Bob Perry, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer,
Richard T. Potis, Sally Anne Sheridan, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Wayne Silzel ,
Don E. Smith, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry
W. Wades, Wayne D. Wedin, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Don R. Roth, Roger R. Stanton
That the proposed 1989-90 Joint Operating Budget Funds of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1989-90 fiscal year, be,
and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows:
Fund Total Amount
Joint Operating/Working Capital $46,581,000
Workers' Compensation Self-Insured 210,000
Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 1,373,000
Public Liability Self-Insured 321,000
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by
Approving the 198 -9 Ca i al the following roll call vote:
Ut ay mevoiving Fund Budget
AYES: Edward L. Allen, Wes Bannister, Roland E. Bigonger, A. B. "Buck" Catlin,
John C. Cox, Jr. , Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Don R. Griffin,
Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, Ronald B. Hoesterey, John Kanel ,
Ursula E. Kennedy, William 0. Mahoney, Tom Mays, James Neal , Carrey
J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Bob Perry, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer,
Richard T. Polls, Salty Anne Sheridan, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Wayne Silzel ,
Don E. Smith, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wanner, Henry
W. Wedaa, Wayne D. Wedin, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Don R. Roth, Roger R. Stanton
That the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF Joint Works Construction) of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, be, and is
hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of $102,725,000.00.
-12-
06/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing taFist:a1 Policy
Committee to evaluate proposals That the Fiscal Policy Committee be, and
and to lace xcess workers, is hereby, authorized and directed to ` ;/
ompensation nsurance coverage evaluate proposals obtained by the `a.►'
effective u y , 1 Districts' insurance broker and to place
Excess Workers' Compensation insurance
coverage effective July 1, 1989; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said action shall be submitted to the Joint Boards for
ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 12, 1989.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amendin Rules of Procedure
Resolution No. 87-51 re That the Boards of Directors hereby
Executive Committee membership adopt Resolution No. 89-56, amending
Rules of Procedure Resolution No. 87-51
re Executive Committee membership. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
lrovin Amendment No. o
g reement Employing General Counsel That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 89-57, approving
Amendment No. 10 to Agreement Employing General Counsel . A certified copy of
this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
on n lassificat on and om en-
sa on Resolution No. 79-20, as That the Boards of Directors hereby
amended re management and adopt Resolution No. 89-66, amending
u ervisor Classifications' sa ar Clasification and Compensation
range ad us ments Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re
Management and Supervisory
Classifications' salary range adjustments, pursuant to the Districts' Management
Performance Review Program. A certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aut or z n the Director o
F nance to certif claims and That the Director of Finance be, and is
forwardo ounty Auditor for hereby, authorized to certify claims and
payment forward to the Orange County auditor for
immediate payment for expenditures
Incurred after June 30, 1989, and that he declare that such certification shall
comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 87-51 pertaining to procedures for
payment of claims against the Districts until the 1989-90 budgets are adopted by
the respective Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS The Boards convened in closed session at
Convene in closed session ours, 7:50 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) (1).
Section .9
ALL DISTRICTS At 8:03 p.m. the Boards reconvened in
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
-13-
06/14/89
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and s ecifications
re on ract No. 4-11-91 That the Board of Directors hereby
adapts Resolution No. 89-59-2, approving
plans and specifications for North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief
Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-3, and authorizing the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
DISTRICTS 6 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Acce t n em orar and ermanen
rants of Easement trOM Rancno That the Boards of Directors hereby
Tomas, Inc. . formerly Apollo adopt Resolution No. 89-62, approving
Development Corporation, re and accepting Grants of Easement from
Contract No. 14-1-1A Rancho Tomas, Inc. , a California
Corporation, formerly Apollo Development
Corporation, a California Corporation, required in connection with temporary
construction and perpetual right-of-way needed relative to the Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, and
authorizing payment of $37,700.00 plus costs for said right-of-way. A certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving agreement with the City
of costa Mesa Tor a cooperative That the Boards of Directors hereby
project re contract NO. 14-1-113 adopt Resolution No. 89-64, approving
agreement with the City of Costa Mesa
for a cooperative project to include City street improvements to Baker Street,
between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, in the District's contract for
construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview
Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B, and providing for reimbursement to the District by
City for their share of the costs of said joint project. A certified copy of
this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection omn ee
o ne o ate a ra ess onal That the Selection Committee be, and is
ervices Agreement with Church hereby, authorized to negotiate a
n neerin Inc. re desi n of Professional Services Agreement with
Contrac o. 7-1 Church Engineering, Inc. for design of
the Campus Relief Sewer, between
Jamboree Boulevard and Von Karmen Avenue, Contract No. 7-13.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
AdJournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m., June 14, 1989.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
_ia_
O6/14/89
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then /
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive fiale and approve
Supplemen ewer Service use Fee That the Supplemental Sewer Service Use
Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90 Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90,
dated June 1, 1989, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICT 1
Public Hearing re proposed _
Or inance No. 112 '
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
open at 8:05 p.m.
Close Hearing There being no public oral comments,
the Chairman declared the hearing
closed at 8:05 p.m.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Readin of Proposed
Ordinance No. it That proposed Ordinance No. 112, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. ill, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance In its entirety be, and
is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 112 by title only.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting Ordinance No. 112 following roll call vote:
AYES: Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset, Ronald B. Hoesterey
NOES: None
ABSENT: Roger R. Stanton
That Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111, be, and is hereby,
adopted.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ,
Directing the County Auditor- . .
ontroller to include sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby -
charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-58-1, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include
sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 112 of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90
fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
-15-
06/14/89
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:06 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
rov nq an e r er No. 1 o he
ans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
on rac NO. 5- 1 specifications for Replacement of
Portions of Coast Highway Force Main,
Contract No. 5-31, authorizing an addition of $163,677.00 to the contract with
Christeve Corporation for additional work due to undisclosed utilities;
installation of three additional pressure access tees and manholes; removal of
contaminated soil ; change in grade for new 36" line to accommodate utility lines;
additional asphalt paving and backfill due to undisclosed 27-inch force main; and
payment of bonus for early completion of contract, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Acce tin ontrac o. - 1
as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 89-60, accepting
Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, as
complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final
Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve
bupplemental bewer Service Use Fee That the Supplemental Sewer Service ose
Report for Fiscal Year 1 Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90,
dated May 31, 1989, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICT 5
Public Hearinq re Dr000sed
Ordinance No.
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
open at 8:07 p.m.
Close Hearing There being no public oral comments,
the Chairman declared the hearing
closed at 8:07 p.m.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
urainance No. 52V That proposed Ordinance No. 519, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and
Is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 519 by title only.
-16-
O6/14/89
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting Ordinance No. 519 following roll call vote:
AYES: John C. Cox, Jr. , Chairman, Evelyn Hart /
NOES: None
ABSENT: Don R. Roth
That Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance -
No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
C3 rtin the Count Auditor-
Con roller to inc ude sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby
charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-61-5, directing
the County Auditor-Controller to include
sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 519 of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90
fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
dJournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:08 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve
em Supplen a Sewer Service Use Fee That the Supplemental Sewer Service Use
Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90 Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90,
dated May 31, 1989, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICT 6
Public Hearin re proposed
Ordinance No. 13
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
open at 8:08 p.m.
Close Hearing There being no public oral comments,
the Chairman declared the hearing
closed at 8:08 p.m.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Readino_ of Propose
Ordinance No. 613 That proposed Ordinance No. 613, An
Ordinance of, the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance _
No. 612, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, an"
is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 613 by title only.
-17-
O6/14/89
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting Ordinance No. 613 following roll call vote:
�..i AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Ruthelyn Plummer
NOES: None
ABSENT: Don R. Roth
That Ordinance No. 613, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance
No. 612, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Directing e County Auditor-
Lontroller to include sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby
charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-63-6, directing
the County Auditor-Controller to include
sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 613 of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90
fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:10 p.m., June 14, 1989.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive file and a rove
Supplemental ewer Hervica Use Fee That the Supplemental Sewer Service Use
Report for Fiscal Year 19du-9u Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90,
dated June 7, 1989, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICT 11
ub is Hearin re ro ose
Ord nance No. 1109
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
open at 8:11 p.m.
Close Hearing There being no public oral comnents,
the Chairman declared the hearing
closed at 8:11 p.m.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
rd nance No. 11U9 That proposed Ordinance No. 1109, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and
is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1109 by title only.
-18-
06/14/89
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting Ordinance No. 1109 following roll call vote:
AYES: Tom Mays, Chairman, Grace Winchell 1 1
NOES: None
ABSENT: Roger R. Stanton
That Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Direct in the ount Auditor-
Controller to nclude sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby
charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-65-11,
directing the County Auditor-Controller
to include sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance
No. 1109 of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, commencing with
the 1989-90 fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving hangs Ortler No. to the
l ans and specifications re That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and
contract No. - 8R-1 specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk
Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at
Various Locations, Contract No. 3-2811-1, authorizing an addition of $72,500.00 to
the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company for payment of bonus for
early completion of specified manholes and rehabilitation of one additional
manhole; and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of said
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 3 The Chairman declared a recess at
Recess 8:12 p.m.
DISTRICT 3 The Chairman reconvened the meeting at
Reconvene 8:25 p.m.
DISTRICT 3 Richard Marsh, Special Counsel to the
Actions re appeal of Beatrice/Hunt- Board, briefly reviewed the proceedings for
Wesson Inc. re Industrial Waste conducting the hearing on the appeal of
Discharge Permit No. -1-143 Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. relative to
Industrial Waste Discharge Permit
No. 3-1-143. The hearing procedures are governed by the District's Ordinance
Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, as.well as the `
Rules on Appeal adopted by the Board of Directors on April 12, 1989.
Mr. Marsh stated that the hearing was being conducted based on written statements
and declarations from both parties. He advised that these declarations, togeth=-
with oral testimoney, constitute the record upon which the Board should case it,
decision. The issue before the Board was whether or net they should grant the
appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson or deny the appeal and reaffirm staff' s decision
relative to permit limits.
-19-
06/14/89
Open hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
open at 8:28 p.m.
Staff presentation The Districts' Director of Technical
Services gave a brief presentation on
the Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson operation and wastewater discharge. For the
Directors' information, he also gave a brief orientation on the Districts'
treatment process, defining some of the terminology used in the statements
submitted to Directors as measures of treatment effectiveness and effluent
quality. One term connonly used is "Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)II which
is a laboratory test which measures the wastewater's potential effect upon
the oxygen levels of a receiving water.
Mr. Anderson added that the Districts are operating under permits from the
Environmental Protection Agency and the State of California. The BOD
requirements of these permits are becoming increasingly stringent, and the
Districts must constantly remain below permit limits. Currently, on an
average, the Districts' influent contains 500,000 lbs. per day of BOD, and
after treatment the BOD in the effluent must be reduced to no more than
180,000 its. per day.
He pointed out that the treatment plants treat an average of 260 million
gallons per day of wastewater. The Districts' 30-year Facilities Master
Plan indicates a need for an expanded capacity to 399 mgd by 2020.
Mr. Anderson reiterated that it is the Districts' intention to remain in
compliance constantly with regulations imposed by EPA .and the State of
California.
In order to accomplish this goal , it is important to strictly enforce the
Districts' source control program. This will help prevent the pass-through
of untreated BOD to the ocean and protect the secondary treatment process.
The bacterial culture used in the secondary treatment process must be stable
and maintained under optimum conditions to provide proper treatment. If
there is a major change in the sewage content, the treatment process is
affected.
The Director of Technical Services also showed the Directors an aerial video
of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson's site and facilities in Fullerton pointing out the
areas where various stages of the canning process take place and open space
areas available for future facilities.
Receive and file A eal 0f Moved, seconded and duly carried:
eatr ce Hunt-Wesson, Inc.
That the Appeal of
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. dated March 22, 1989, re Industrial Waste
Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file Itemization of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Items of Evidence submitted on
behalf of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. That the Itemization of Items of
Evidence dated May 22, 1989, submitted
on behalf of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit
No. 3-1-143, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
-20-
06/14/89
Receive and file Statement of Facts Moved, seconded and duly carried:
and Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Support o Appeal That the Statement of Facts and
Memorandum of Points and Authorities /
in Support of Appeal , dated May 23, 1989, re Industrial Waste Discharge t�J
Permit No. 3-1-143, including:
- Declaration of James N. Williams
- Declaration of Robert C. Thomas
- Declaration of John Baird
be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file Statement of Facts Moved, seconded and duly carried:
and Memorandum of Points and
Authorities n Opposition to Appeal That the Statement of Facts and
Memorandum of Points and Authorities
in Opposition to Appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc., dated June 2, 1989,
re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143, be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed.
Receive and file Itemization of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Items of Evidence submitted on
ehalf of the District That the Itemization of Items of
Evidence dated June 2, 1989, submitted
on behalf of the District, re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143,
Including:
- Declaration of Richard W. von Langan
- Declaration of Stephen C. Hough
- Declaration of David Jenkins
- Declaration of Kelly Christensen
- Declaration of Blake Anderson
be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
Oral resentation b The Chair recognized Mr. Joel
Beatrice Hunt-Wesson, nc. Moskowitz, of the law firm of Gibson,
Dunn & Crutcher, representing
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. Mr. Moskowitz questioned the authority and
propriety of the District's staff imposing a BOD limitation and requiring
pretreatment of their industrial discharge and a reduction of BOD from their
cannery. He contended that the canning facility in question had not grown,
although he admitted there were seasonal variations, and did not feel it was
fair to reduce their BOD limits three months prior to canning season. He
also contended that the reason for the restrictions placed upon Beatrice was
to accommodate the growth of Orange County.
Mr. Moskowitz then cross examined the Districts' declarants Rich von Langan,
Kelly Christensen, Stephen Hough, Blake Anderson and David Jenkins. Thomas
L. Woodruff, General Counsel for the staff, also responded to Mr. Moskowitz'
cross examination.
In closing, Attorney Moskowitz expressed Beatrice's concerns regarding the
necessary investment to build a pretreatment facility on their site. He
felt that there was not sufficient time to obtain the necessary approvals. l
He also felt that the surrounding residential areas would object to this �✓
-21-
06/14/89
type of facility. Mr. Moskowitz contended that the District already had
treatment facilities and Beatrice should not be required to build such
facilities. He reiterated that their plant size had not increased and
Beatrice did not feel they should have to shoulder the burden he alleged was
�✓ caused by the growth in Orange County.
He also objected to the possibility that Beatrice may have to cut back their
production in order to meet the Districts' restrictions during this canning
season.
District's oral res onse to Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Beatrice Hun - esson s a ea reviewed a prepared summary of remarks
y beneral Counsel and responses which were itemized for
Directors and displayed via an
overhead projector for them to follow. He advised that negotiations with
Beatrice regarding possible future limitations on their discharge began as
early as 1985 and referred to a letter included in the declarations
submitted by the District which advised Beatrice of this. He commented that
the Directors had been unfairly disparaged recently by a lot of
misinformation that had been mailed to them by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson
Interests.
In response to Beatrice' s contention that it was unfair to ask them to build
pretreatment facilities, he noted that 356 other industries have spent from
$25,000 to $5 million to build such facilities in order to comply with
environmental requirements.
With regard to the question posed by Beatrice relative to the legal basis by
which the District has the right to impose said limitations, Mr. Woodruff
responded as follows:
- The Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Clean Water Act")
mandated the development by the U.S. EPA of a National
Pretreatment Program designed to prevent the discharge to
POTW's of pollutants which Interfere with, pass through or
are otherwise incompatible w7h Eie treatment facilities.
[Clean Water Act, Section 307(b)(c)]
- The U.S. EPA has adopted a comprehensive national program
regulating dischargers and establishing pretreatment
standards and requirements for industrial users and
mandating local POTW's to implement this program by adoption
of their own pretreatment programs. [Title 40, Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 403]
- The Federal Pretreatment Regulations prohibit any user from
introducing into any POTW any pollutant, including GOD,
which passes through or causes interference with POTW's
treatment processes or operations. [Title 40, Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 4033.5(b) (4)]
- Both state and local law authorize the Districts to regulate
Beatrice' s 800 discharge into the sewer system. [California
Government Code Section 54739; Districts' Ordinance No. 306,
Sections 201, 208(B) (4) and 302.1(c)]
-22-
06/14/89
- The Districts complied with applicable federal , state and
local regulations in developing the BOD discharge limitation
policy. [Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 403.1 at seq. ; California Government Code
Section 54739; District's, Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201
and 208(B)(4)]
- Locally established limits imposed upon individual
industrial users should be preventative rather than
reactive.
- The Districts have followed the express published guidelines
of EPA for pretreatment regulation and implementation, by
considering all relevant treatment plant and environmental
information, together with sound engineering and scientific
data, in establishing the Districts' BOD discharge limits.
[EPA Guidance Manual on Development and Implementation of
Local Discharge Limitations Under the Pretreatment Program
(December 1987) , Section 1.3.2]
- District's Ordinance No. 306 authorizes the District's staff
to impose pretreatment and discharge limitation conditions
on industrial users. [District's Ordinance No. 306,
Sections 302.1 and 302.2] Mr. Woodruff quoted portions of
those sections of the Ordinance, as follows:
"302.1 Class I Permit Application:
A. ......
B.
C. Other information may be required to properly
evaluate the permit application. After
evaluation and acceptance of the data
furnished, the District may issue a Class I
wastewater discharge permit, subject to terms
and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and
as otherwise determined by the Chief Engineer
to be necessary to protect the District' s
system."
11302.2 Class I Permit Conditions, Limitations and
Stipulations that may be in Permit:
A. Mass emission rates regulating incompatible
pollutants;
B. . .....
C. ......
D. ......
E. ......
F. ......
G. ... ...
H. ......
I.
J. Other provisions which may be applicable to
ensure compliance with all provisions of this
Ordinance;
K. Other terms and conditions determined by the
Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the
District's system."
-23-
O6/14189
Mr. Woodruff emphasized that based on the above, it is simply not true that
the District does not have authority to impose limits on Beatrice just
because the classification relative to industries discharging over
10,000 lbs. of BOD was not specifically listed in the District's Ordinance.
To date there have only been two other industries in this category--Anaheim
Citrus Products (ACP) and Integrated Protein Technology (IPT). They have
both built pretreatment facilities and modified their procedures to meet the
same discharge standards imposed upon Beatrice.
He noted that the Districts' past experience establishes that excessive BOD
discharges seriously threaten the Districts' wastewater treatment plants as
they pass through and interfere with the operation of the plants and,
therefore, jeopardize the Distri—cfs 301(h) waiver in its NPDES Permit, as
stated in the declarations of David Jenkins and Richard von Langen.
Mr. Woodruff added that Beatrice has the ability to implement procedures to
significantly reduce SOD discharges even without construction of a
pretreatment facility. He referred to declarations of Kelly Christensen and
Richard von Langen which detail some possible procedures.
Declarations of David Jenkins and Richard von Langen indicate that Beatrice
will be able to efficiently operate a pretreatment facility on a seasonal
basis. In peak season, Beatrice's BOD is twice the amount generated by the
total population of the City of Fullerton. Also, in peak season, Beatrice's
discharge of BOD increased approximately 18% between 1984 and 1987. He
reiterated that without the District's BOD limitations, in peak season,
Beatrice and other high volume BOD dischargers would cause violations of the
Districts' NPDES Permit limits.
The General Counsel noted that the Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson facility in
Fullerton was not, in fact, in the middle of a residential development, as
Beatrice had alleged. There are residences on the eastern boundary, with an
airport on the western boundary, and the Hughes factory to the north. The
area is basically an industrial park with many industries and a refinery.
Mr. Woodruff agreed that Orange County is fast growing and stated that it is
the Districts' responsibility to provide treatment facilities for all areas
and the new growth. They must, at the same time, comply with all
regulations placed on them by federal and state regulatory agencies. The
philosophy of the Districts is to protect the land, air and water. Since
1974 the Districts have spent over $300 million, and over the next 10 years
they will spend $1 billion to expand and improve the Districts' treatment
facilities. Without enforcement of the Districts' BOD policy, the Districts
would be required to expend an additional $22 million in capital costs for
construction of treatment facilities merely to treat Beatrice's BOD
discharges, as indicated in the declaration of Stephen Hough.
The General Counsel added that the District's action to issue a permit with
conditions to protect the environment does not constitute a "project"; but
even if it were, the action is exempt from compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") , pursuant to California Code Regulations,
Title 14, Sections 15307, 15308 and 15321.
He advised Directors that the District's Ordinance No. 306 and the
Districts' 1985 NPDES Permit, both of which are part of the record, were
available for further review.
�...� Close hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
closed at 11:20 p.m.
-24-
06/14/89
Discussion. by Directors The Board of Directors then entered
Into a lengthy discussion. They
asked whether the requirements placed on Beatrice were consistent with other
dischargers of their volume and were informed that the 10,000 lb. per day
BOD limitation would apply District-wide. v
Board members inquired about the $4 million estimate for Beatrice to
construct pretreatment facilities. Staff reiterated that if Beatrice did
not limit their BOD, the District would have to build treatment plant
facilities to provide for an additional 15 mgd capacity which has an
estimated capital cost to the District of $22 million.
Directors reviewed the possible alternative procedures available to Beatrice
during the peak period when they would exceed their BOD limitation. Staff "
noted that they had offered to allow Beatrice to truck their excess
wastewater directly to the Districts for disposal but thus far have had no
response to that offer.
The Board also discussed possible legal actions available to the District in
order to stop the excess BOD discharge from the Beatrice facility.
It was pointed out by Dr. Jenkins that Beatrice could operate a
substantially odor-free anaerobic pretreatment facility, based on his
observations of other similar operations. The amount of land needed for
this system would depend upon the design but based on information available
to the District, staff estimated .7 acres would be needed.
Directors noted that the Districts' industrial wastewater treatment program
began in 1976, with pretreatment facilities being required beginning in
1978. Industries in Orange County were involved in the preliminary
workshops prior to adoption of Ordinances in 1976, 1983 and the new
ordinance to be introduced at the next regular Board meeting. Staff pointed
out that the industrial sector and an ad hoc committee had participated with
staff in determining the limitations on metals, pollutants, etc. Mr. Baird
of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson participated in the last revision of the proposed
new ordinance also.
The Board questioned whether a pretreatment facility at the Beatrice site
would require City of Fullerton permits or CEQA approval. The District's
General Counsel indicated that they would be subject to the City's land use
requirements but did not know if additional permits would be required. The
project would also be subject to CEQA guidelines, requiring preparation of a
negative declaration or an EIR, as appropriate.
Directors expressed concern that a large industry like Beatrice would not
take measures to meet environmental standards and the District's
requirements in order to avoid adverse impacts on the treatment process of
all of the Districts and, ultimately, on the ocean. They observed that a
large industry such as Beatrice should take the responsibility and
leadership in such a program.
It was pointed out by Directors that the Districts have a mandate, as well
as an obligation, to protect the environment and to comply with federal and -
state standards.The Board discussed the issue of equitability of the allocation of costs to
all users for the treatment of wastewater by the Districts' facilities, as
well as the requirement for industry to build pretreatment facilities.
Staff stated that the Districts are concerned with these issues also and
felt that the Ordinance provided equitability.
-25-
06/14/89
Denial of a eal of Beatrice/Hunt- A motion was made, seconded and, after
esson nc. re ndustria waste discussion, amended, as follows:
Discharge Permit No. J-1-143
That the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 3 hereby finds that:
- On February 15, 1989, the District issued Permit No. 3-1-143
("Permit") to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ('Beatrice').
- This Permit contains limits on the discharge of Biochemical Oxygen
Demand (BOD) as set forth herein.
- The BOD limits are in accord with previously developed discharge
limits applicable to industrial dischargers of disproportionately
large amounts of BOD.
- The BOD limits set forth in the Permit are necessary in order to meet
NPDES Permit requirements and prevent pass-through or interference
with the treatment processes of Plant No. 2.
- The methodology of restricting the introduction of 800 into Plant
No. 2 as evidenced by the Permit is consistent with the guidelines
promulgated by EPA.
- The Permit was validly issued under the laws of the State of
California and the District's Regulations for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities.
- The issuance of the permit is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act because (a) The issuance of this
permit is not a project or (b) If the issuance of the permit is
determined to be a project, it is categorically exempt under 14
California Code of Regulations Sections 15307; 15308 and 15321.
- The classification which distinguishes Beatrice and other
high-strength BOD dischargers from other users of the Districts'
sewerage system is reasonable.
- There are feasible methods by which Beatrice can obtain the BOB levels
set forth in the Permit.
- These methods can be implemented for costs which are reasonable in
light of all the circumstances prevailing.
and, therefore, does hereby deny the appeal of Beatric/Hunt-Wesson, Inc.
dated May 22, 1989; does ratify the action taken by the District staff in
Issuing Permit No. 3-1-143; and does confirm all the provisions thereof.
The Directors commented further on the Districts' legal and environmental
responsibilities and obligations, as well as the equitability of the costs
• associated with treatment of wastewater.
Following a call for the question, a roll call vote was taken on the motion
to deny the appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. The Secretary reported
that the motion had carried.
-26-
06/14/89
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman them
declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:55 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
Secretary, Uoaras of Directors
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-27-
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04189 PAGE I
REPORT NUMBER AP43 ,.
_..-..._......... ..... 08__ORAHGC_COUNTY_.-_... __-
CLAIMS PAID 05/ID/89 POSTING DATE 05/I11/89
_-WARRANT-N0, _ . _.. .. .. _ .. VENDOR _..._ . _.__.-...__.__._.._..__AMOUNT-___..
09e451 A.M. BEST COMPANY f90.It PUBLICATION
--09 9452-------ASL-CONSULTING-CNGINCCRS-__--- - SX.S61.DA_ ___. _ __ ENGINEERING-SERVICES GIST 5----- - - -- --- ---
099453 ACME WELDING $3,015.70 TRAILER REPAIR
099454 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. $1,392,676.97 CONSTRUCTION 3-15
..ATM-FHOTO_SERVICES--- 3265.CD_ _ AIRIAL-PHOTOS ----- ---- -- - --- - ----.:.
099456 AMERIC4N COMPUTER SUPPLY f27.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES
099457 AMERICAN MEDIA, INC. S557.45 VIDEO -
----499456- AMER ICAN.-T ECHNI CAL-SUPPLY---._ 1.408«74 ___ . _ ._.._ ._____FILM-- ^`
099459 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION S4Y366.32 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7 ..
D99460 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. fg0.D4 MECHANICAL PARTS
.---C4R461-___- __ ._A.PLUS.SYSTEMS. --_.- -.31,332.36---.-._. - ._ ___NOTICE6
099462 A5ATE0 SERVICES, INC. $553.35 UNIFORMS
099463 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $99,341.22 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88
--.._ 090464--_....__._. . BOW SAFETY 4 -SUPPLY-------------_. _-_--2954--0O_ -- -._SAFE'TY3UPVLIES- __.... _.--.•
099465 BACHARACH. INC. f221.46 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
099466 P.V. SAROTTI AND ASSOC. $6,840.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-25626.P2-32.33.34.37
-rTT_-_099467- - BATTERIES WEST. INC..______' - .TRUCK--PARTS
X C9P46P hA3IER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1.781.97 LAB SUPPLIES
2 999469 BEACON BAY ENTLRPRISCS. INC. 3146.85 CAR WASH TICKETS
-1099470---.MARK- -SEWER-JOFNT-REPAIRS-----------_-'b
t" 099471 ROPERT BEIN.YTLLIAM FROST E AS S16.664.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES 88-144-5.89-14
099472 8015E CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 91 641.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES
__. __099473.._-_ - .._ BON-A-RUES _. . . .__ .--_..___--336i.i 0.-. _..... -TRUCK--PARTS --.
099474 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $64,822.93 ENGINNERING SERVICES RES 88-105
F„ 09-475 BRENNER-FIEDLER C ASSOC., INC. $366.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES i.
------094476-----BRITMINEE ELECTRIC-- -----�5$22D.00 -----_ - - - ---USCTRIFMET6R- ___-___..
0It
99477 BROWN 9 CALDWELL 3228.00 LAB SERVICES
099478 STEVE 6 CALOY ELL TRUC7LTING f27.SItl.56 CNCINEERINC SERVICES P2-37
- ---' -t`994Te - - STE VE PUBALO CONST0.UCl30N-COr'-"'--'---'--'-----3185 rd OO.00 - - -CONSTRUCTION-2-26-1---
:99486 PUMKE ENGINEERING CO. $44.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
494481 GARY G. STREED 3460.D6 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
- ---'d9e4hY--'-'-----C'R-R RECORD]IION INS-CO.---'--------f3I0a+10------ - - METER
099483 CS COMPANY S3.242.11 VALVE
C99484 CSI-CALTROL 14.503.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS
-- 099A85 ---- - CAL-GLASS FOP RESEARCH.--INC.------ - --- -i49r71-- -- - -- ----LAB SUPPLIES-----
. .___.. .__.._ - n•.
099466 CAL-FAO CHEMICAL NEE CO.. INC. 466.14 CHEMICALS
099487 CABLE TON ENGINEERS f4.466.11 ENGINEERING SERVICES
�----099eB8--------JOHN GARGLE O- ENGINEERS-- -5204T450r4 T��-��--- --�-�_. __-ENGINBERING-&ERVICE"-15.P1-20------- -------'
_. 699489 CASE POWER S EGUIPMENT $1,938.39 TRUCK PARTS
04549E CENTURY SAFETY INST. A SUPP. f118.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES
�m
. ..- 099491' .___. CHAMPION FENCE CO. - _ _ .__ ...__ .. __._._ ..-32.538-4V__ _ _.. .___.FENCING—_-..__._._._. __.__ ._ ..
091497 CHEP SERVICE 3452.1E LAB SUPPLIES
099493 CHEMYEST INDUSTRIES. INC. SBG.574.40 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-09-88
� .. ----099494—...._-_. CHESSELL COPE. -_ _.___.-......-_.._,-._____--S39B.7B-.__... ._... _ .__CHARTS._-__--.-._..
099495 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. f13.595.36 OIL 6 CREASE
099496 CNPISTEVE CORP. $804,252.75 CONSTRUCTION 5-31
FUND NO 91-^ JT LIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 5164/89 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
SA,NI-T O,T ION DI STR I;jR OF OR All COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 45 1P/89 POSTING DATE 05/I6/89
V ON P A N T- NE.._ ._... VENDOR. . ._...-._ ...__-_ AMOUNT ._ ....DESCRIPTION._- ._-..._._ . . . .. . _____
D99497 WILLIAM N. CLARKE 396.00 MEETING EXPENSE
'......__..A29JIIO_.__....,._.. CDP INN° CLAWSON. . E923A BE..... _ MEETINO_EXPENSE
099499 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY $323,400.00 IN6URANCC M.O. 4-12-89
099500 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF 32.050.OJ ALUMINUM PWTING
CONNELL G.M. PARTS_/. DIVA.-_____—.._. TRUCK PARTS
P99502 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST. $2,632.01 ELECTR3C SUPPLIES -
09950] CONSOLIDATED FPEIGFTVAYS $944.99 FREIGHT
1___099}D4-__.. ...... COOPER.,ENERLY.SESVICE.S _ _U2S94,_Ag_.___. _. _ . _..MECHANCIAI_ SUPPLL„IES _
09950 PL COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 32,269.11 BUILDING SUPIES
099506 CRANE VEY OF CORP. 5g42.03 BUILDING MATE0.IAL8
.._ _099507_ CM AP.LES P. [R OVL EI CO.A _____-,.-______._165.0 fi._... ._REN.PARTS +'
P9950P - CAL WATER f165.04 _ _ RENTAL EQUIPMENT
099509 CYBFPEY f2,253.0[ SERVICE AGREEMENT
INGINES!73.3:L__- HARDWAREEDIR6 ;..
'' - - 099511 OME, INC. f2TS.JU ��_��-_-�—IUIPDLIARE --�-- -
099512 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE f5,503.01 TIRES
099513._. . _ .. . TOP. DAWES . . . __317}..50..._ ,. ._ MEETING .BXFENS9- ._
X.._
099530 OECD - - ""_..-_____._._._ .._.... ._-- $676.92 � ELECTRIC SUPPLIES �
2 399525 OEZURIM AND/OR IS CO. II oq VALVE PARTS 1%
DIAIEC. POLYPERS
099517 OICKSON3 _-- --- ----_----- $48.55 -ELECTRIC PARTS��E=10=@E
-4 099518 DORA00 ENTERPRISES, INC. $3,943.22 PLAT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIR
EDWARDS CORP. .____.__..-..._._._...__367E.28.- ._ _. .._ . ._.._ PAINT..SUEPLIES --_.-,-_,
099520 C.I.L. INSIPUMENTS. INC. 3199.79 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT
N 099521 FFE TEC MN OL OGIE1 $1,879.13 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
---099522.__-.-- __.. EAS T.MAN,_INC._. S.._ �511.A 2.__..._. CONSTRUCTION 2-
099523 W. M. CDCRT COGS. -- f10JrTll.gl CONSTRUCTION 1-27
099524 ECOSYSTEMS ENG.L ANALYSIS $1,260.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
099525 ._ EFFECTIVE VISUAL IM AGC RY_..- -.. .__ . ._._.. ._. .. . .. -13,592.14. .__ ACTION.PWN_SLIUES.._.___._...
099526 COWARD L. ELLIOT. JP. $752.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES
099527 EMERY S PUROLATOR $35.00 FREIGHT
_..._0-4520-.-.__ ..ENCMANTE PMLN_ .__ _ $7,618.30.__.__ . . LOCKERORAPIIIFJ{ESGEONJLIL.6_ll1-fl7___._.._.
699530 FACTOREVERECY EQUIPMENT fN$686.95 INSTRUMENT
CONSTRUCTION-SERVICES
PARTS
--099531-. . ... .. FJOHNARR R. FAL AF.SERVICE
P.C..._______.__.. ___._.-�3$220.SL_.._.. .... _.FILTERUCTION_SERVICES. J-7e4._J-10.. .. . ........__. __."��'
C99532 FAPR SALES A SERVILE $$69.00 FILTER
•99533 FAST CX, INC. 369.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
_.._..._AIR.PEE1Cur �
--09953p--_. ..FEDERAL-GA EGRESS CORE..-.-._..-_._-____-_-_.5306..56--.----- -
099536 FILTER GAS 67.50 PROPANE
' 099536 FILTER SUPPLY CO. .6.150.16 MECHANICAL PARTS
- 099537- . GELDERFLO-SYL TEMS _____.. _.--.__..._._..._._.. . .._i6$251.02 .. .. PUMP PARTS.___._ __...._.... .. ..._.,, .._...._'...
C94539 FOUNTAIN
PUVALL. INC. S251.02 PUMP PARTS
C99539 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 3203.01 FAIT SUPPLIES
- FIBERGLASS INCIpLLCF° _.—$5.650.53._._.._. _. _ENGINACT EERNG SERVICES
^'
099542 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. 35,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES .T-IS
0995g2 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION 310u.267.30 CONSTRUCTION J-IRA -
FUND NO 4149 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5104/89 PAGE .
REPORT NUMBER AP43 ..
_-_._—_.__._._..._.._.-.. __....... .. . ..........-_...-..000KT.Y-41N I-T FT I ON_D I STRI P I A F._OPINGE-COUNTY
..__..._...—
CLAIMS PAID 05/10/E9 POSTING DATE ".5/10/69
...._UAPRANT.NO.- . _. ....._ VENDOR...__._.._.._-...__--.-AMOUNT--__.. .. _DES CR I P_7 I ON__--_.--...__.
099543 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,263.84 TELEPHONE
. ...—.DSR544.--- -. __-GFORGC. LEECH.A.ASSCCIA.TLS----_ SLs21%.A4._-_----- . ...ELECTRIC-PART8------.-.........._ _...
299545 GIERLICH-MITCHFLL. INC. $19,269.38 MECHANICAL PARTS
D99546 GOLDEN COAST BIOMASS ENERGY CO $668.41 SAWDUST
----09954T.------.._ THOMAS GRAY d ASSOC.. -1NC.----__.._..__.-.-._.-345G.00 _ SAFETY-TESTING-------- --- ---_4
099540 GREAT FACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. 1130.48 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
099549 DON GPCCK A ASSOCIATCS $6,293.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES RESSS-141-2
m
. . .. _ _-.099554_._.. _.. GAINNELL COSROP ATION.----._---.---_-----340.34.._... __. ._._..FITTING
099552 HALORIN SUPPLY CO. f41.33 FITTINGS
099552 HARBOUR KIRK.
$9r241.33 PUMP PARTS gyp,
:.._._.__099553.... . HATCH L. RIPR. INC.-. .--. .._.-_..._._-.,—___- ._SS1517.24 -. .. ... . MECHANICAL PARTS-- _..-....__.._..,..__...-.--:
D99555 HFWLETT PAC KARD 1$89.76 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
D 99555 MILTI, INC. fBY.7b PUMP PARTS
.-..__.HOCRBTG ELCCTRIC ------ �7,899.44- - -- -
099557 MOCRB DOCTOR
C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. $1r899.OB MBACHAUTS PARTS
099558 HOSE DOLT UR 5151.9E BFORM?ATTERIES—
PART—
fTI---U99559 - � � � HOUSE Of BATTERIES -----------�----- —d593.T2 - -- BATTBR388 - ---_...,_.
2 D99560 A.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. 33118.5b HARDWARE
199561 HUGHES MICROELECTRONIC f949.44 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
—095562--- -----CITY-OF- HUNTINGTON-NEACN ------------LF19559 r2 b-- - -- --WATER-USEAGS-
.. � 099563 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY f127.20 HARDWARE
-I 099564 IND OELAVAL INC. 21,608.56 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
n—099565.......... . ._...ISCO C09PANY...
09956fi INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,291.89 FITTINGS
4� 099567 INGRAM PAPER S256.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES +'
- ------DIPS 56B -- - ---IRVINE-RANCH-WATER-DIBTRIGTT —iih64 - -- -------HATER-USEAGE- ----- --
099569 RIVIERA FINANCE $676.82 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
099570 KAMAN BEARINGS 9 SUPPLY SS6.99 FITTINGS
w
. .. . 099571 .. KAN ER COMPANY .. _... _........ _._..._..,.-_._........_. ...—_314.16. TOOLS---____.._ —_.._-_.._ ...,... _ . .....-.-•.
D99572 NECNAN SUPPLY 3570.49 VALVE
099573 THE KEITh COMPANIES $4,418.06 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 88-65-3
KIEWIT PACIFIC CO, " ------"CONSTRUCTION-SERVICES-P1-20.P 1-31"-�-" -----"'
649575 KING BEARING, INC. f13r339.45 MACHINE SUPPLIES
099576 KTPST PUMP R MACHINE WORKS S1.115S.D0 PUMP PARTS
- - 499977 " ` -- MARTIN KORDICK. SP - -- '--' ---"'------ f2Y612r20 -- ' - "" " CONSTRUCTION-SERVICES-'5-29,5-31 "'
R99578 L.A. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $Lr367.52 PUMP PARTS
099579 t.B.U.S.• INC. $21.69 WELDING SUPPLIES
---U995 B0— --LASER SUPPLIES --f524.97 - PRINT SUPPLIES—
099581 ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE f30D.00 PUBLICATIONS
099582 LEARN - PC VIDFD SYSTEMS f703.51' COMPUTER VIDEO
'-- 099583 LIFECDM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPNLV-'------- -- -- ---325.00 - "' CYLINDER REPAIRS-----"' -'-
J995b4 LIMITOPQUE CORP. $1,876.35 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
399585 K.P. LINDSTROM, INC. S1J.359.40 CONSULTING SERVICES-MASTER PLAN
--099566'-- - M9C APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL------ MUM MONITORING-- -"
099587 MPS $52.37 PHOTO SERVICES
09958E M4CDMC0 1109.80 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
FUND NO 919c - JT DIST VOPKING CIFITAL FROCESSING 04TE 5/04/89 PAGE 0
REPORT NUMBER AP43
ANLLt TON_.OJSTRIM.,QF QPANQE COUNTY
CLAIMS TRIG G5/19/tl9 POSTING DATE 03/10/B9
_. WARRANT NO. _ . VENDOR .__.___.__ ..__........._ AO DNML__.__._. _ DESCRIPU ON
099509 MALCOLM PIRNIE r INC. 6436.39 ENGINEERING SERViCEY - MASTER PLAN
_._09959TL_... .. .. . MARSHALL MA/NT. PPODU9110ONS f2Q3.,OP_ ._ _ _". SAFETY,
099591 MARVAC ELECTRONICS f31.7B INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
099592 MASTER TOOLS SERVICES S512.04 TOOL REPAIR
GATT CNLOP.. INC. ___ � •. . _...____..____.__ ...1Lt03.67_ . CNCORIARTI0T1jART$
099595 MCKFNNA EEQUIR. 8 EGUIP. lIb$572.27 TRUCK
PARTS
099595 MCHINLEY EQUIPMENT CORPGDR f372.27 TRUCK PARTS
m
:. 597 .. ._.._ PEOLIN CO NPDL9 CO. 33R0.59__ . .___.GAUDE
099A97 MLADENORE AHD/OP VOTERS S1.165.09 CAB EQUIPMENT
099998 MLA DEN 6UNTICN COkSTPUCTION CO S355 r585.99 CONSTRUCTION 3-34R
n.
,.,MONITOR. INC. ... .__... OFFICEf320.32..___.._. .. . . ._ SUB REPAIRS ___.___
C99601 PONITOR PUBLISHING CO. a300.00 LABS SERVICES �..
099L01 MONTGOM ENY STRIESILABORATORIES f2rB65.0p LAB ERRVICF.S 9.
.__.999602__. ...._._MOTTON OROLA CELLULAR SERVICES
s332..R1_—__._..__ ._..._._CELLULARROOVETS
099603 NATIONAL CELLULAR SERVICES S73.83 CELLULAR TELEPNONB SERVICES
099605 NATIONAL ELECTRIC TEAT. ASSOC. 9231.J0 PUBLICATION
fT-_. .099606 _ NOTIONAL FILTER MEDIA CORP. ___.SB.S25.69 __ ._. .. ._._.. HARDWARCAL.PABTS____.__.
X 09960E CITY SUPPLY CO. 5360.04 WATER
= 099607 CITY OF NEVPOGT BEACH 321.79 HECHN USEAG¢
W___09960K.—._. ._. _.NOR.THVEBT_.R Oi OR WELDING,,-INC.- _.__ ____._.560..00_.. _.. . . _... __.TUSK BINLP6KT5____
C99610 O.M.S. 313194.29 SAFETY
BINS
—I C99610 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 3194.29 SAFETY CLASSES
...._.. p99611........ ._ OFFICE PAVILI ONA NT ERIOR._eES.--.____.J1.a 721.97......_.._ ._... _ __ OFFICE.PUEUIIUBE—_._—__.____ ._.__.
D 099612 O
p FFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDES 165.00 SUBCRE"ION
� C99613 OLYN P I C CHEMICAL CO. S39.6J1.2P CHLORINE M.O. 10-12-88
ELCT
. .._.._._.. 099614.._.-..._._..ORANGE..COAST ELEC.TKPARTS CO. ._SAS4.76--._._.._.._... ._ . _. .. TRUCK
IPARTS INS__.._____.__±
099616 ORANGE COUNTY AUTOCHEMICAL
PARTS CO. f139.16 TRUCK PARTS
09961E ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. f30.16 CHEMICALS
.'.'. _._..C99617 OXYGEN VALVE E FI Ii IN G-CD. .. ..._._—_______..._._$912.35.._.. .. FITTINGS__—___-___._..............._.
09961E OXYGCOUNTY
OF VICEORANGE
s912.91 ENGCIALTYINEERING
GASERV
099619 COUNTY Of ORANGE 53.902.95 REIMBURSE. SERVICES
_. 099620_.._.__.._._COUNTYPACIFI SANITATION.CONSYSTEMS __yg.415.88 -_.._.._....._..__COMPUTER SOFTWARE f.ONE_IBSDdANC!_ _._.._!•:
D99621 PACIFIC DATA CON SYSTEMS MS .405.65 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
C99622 PACO PUMPS $1 r046.63 PUMP PARTS
. .... 099624 —. _. .. . PACIFIC SAFETY CGUIP HCNT-CO.-- --_____ .�1...$13.k3.__. .. .. SAFETY
099624 PACIFIC BELL 324.31 JANITORIAL
_
PHONE
099425 PAK VEST 1.24.3E JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
"626--.._ .....PARTS ENGINEERING COMNC.--__..__ ._-._f96.93,-----�—� --..__ ..._.MECHANSAZm_VIDFA0A
099622 PARTS I SOUND CO. COMPANY f166.36 MECHANICAL PARTS
09962E PHOTO C SOUND CO. 1361.12 JANITORIAL
EQUIPMENT
.. 099630 P PLASTIC
PAPER _ - _- __._.._..._..__ ._..$291.7 T._. ... __ _... PLASTIC BOTTLES
__.....
099630 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES f191.67 PLASTIC BOTTCM9
699631 POWERURE. INC. $11r964.L7 CATIONIC POLYMERS M.0.3-8-89
•99632— . . .._.POWER ELECIkO.
099633 POWER MACM1kE CO. I316S18.9J MECRANCIAL
COMPUTERS PARTS
" 099639 FOYER-UF l52.93 COMPUTER SOFITIARC
�.` m
FUND NO 919P JT FIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04/89 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
OF ARLUGE._EOUNTY..__-._._
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/89 POSTING DATE 55/I0IS9
_-YARR4NT-NO. - - . . .. . _.. VENDOR _ . .--.____-_.____ __._-_lRO UNZ__--_. .._... __ -OESCRIRTION
O99635 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE f99.90 ICE -
- THC-PROJECTS SOLUTION -CO.-------------SS.Oft.0 v INSTBDHENT-INSPECTIOR-P1-20.J-
13.P2-77.77-- --- -
C99637 RNI MARK-TING $140.00 OFFICE REMOVALS
O99639 RED WI INC. f39,190.G0 SLEDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
REM DING SHOES _ ___ _.-_.__.-_._-S2B9.CR .- -. . ._. -SAFETY -_-__.__-_-___._!:
099641 REMEDY TEMP f1,026.V5 SIPS FITS SERVICES
099691 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 693tl.P5 PIPE P1ttIHC3
n:
---- --099692------- -- REY R. D POWERROBERTS TO CORP.kIbSION------------44,226.04- ---- -_ ...-_..__._-CONSTRUCTION
-- -_-.��
099644 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. i9999220.39 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4.J-20
099645 ROPINSON FERTILIZER CO. i29652.96 CHEMICALS
��- - 099615 ---P 05AN/P EYNO PO '87M 97- - - - -- ---- REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
C99646 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL 63,451.9J INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
099647 POTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. 526R.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
----09 9690-------SAFCTT-KLEEMCRIN6 . INC. -- ,832.P9-��_ ----- -- --PARSE-GLEANER --------
099650 SARGEN ENGINEERING . INC f17$356.61 LONER REPAIRS
049650 SARGENT-WELCH scirNTIFIC CO. iSS6.61 EAH SUPPLIES
-nl.__ 099651-- - - THE SEER DIXON RSSOC I4 TES-------------- -315,753.21--- - - - --APPRAISALNSERVICECE6-DIST ,-fi i6 -- -
X 099652 THE SCHOOLLE TRO l39TSD.00 APPRAISAL SERVICES
= P99653 SEA-CONS ELECTRONICS. INC. 3220.04 LAE SUPPLIES
--•-•�-099664------SEA-COCK SUP.3I4NS-.-. -__-___-._�E9-459.2i- - - - _ - --_OFFICE-REPATeS--
- W U99655 SHAMROCK SUPPLY .733.69 TOOLS
H U99656 SIGMA GIRDDT$ f19T3J.69 SLPDND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
v
0996F7-- ----SLIDE-MAKERS VEST -- ---t3f960-- '-" '- - -- - - SLIDE-SERVICES -- --- ----=_
)C. 099658 SMITH-EMERY CO. 5637.5J SOIL TESTING
L 6996'_9 SMITH FIPE E SUPPLY. INC f109.94 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
---�-099660--'---3010-AND-TESTING ENbiNEERS 1i51.07-- SOIL TESTING ------
099661 SO. COAST AIR DUALITY f500.01 PERMIT FEES
099662 SOUTH COAST DODGE $37.14 TRUCK PARTS
c
- - --- 899663 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO.- - ------ - ---- - -i4,126.01 -- -'- ' POWER--------
699669 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 123,263.88 DIESEL FUEL
099465 SPEAR FIPCLINL CONSTRUCTION $11,932.68 CONSTRUCTION DIST 14
-----P9566b---------SPEC TECH WESTERN---- ---- ---flb T.74--- - ------- --HEADING-SUPPLIES--------- ---
099667 SPEECO $1,856.38 SCALE MAINTENANCE
099669 ROBERT SPIES $650.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ANNUAL REPORT
.. --_..P99669 .. .- ....__.STAR TOOL-B SUPPLY CO. .....--..__----.. .-.-. --iS 5.E0._ _ _ . - .... _TOOLS-
099670 SCOTT aEVEMS 539.79 MEETING EXPENSE
v
C99671 SUPELCO, INC. 3I.145.80 LAB SUPPLIES
�996'72--'--THP SUPPLICPS'-'--- ------ ----'-012Y091.99- '-MLCNANICAC'-PARTY-- ---- -_- ---�
09903 SUR-LITE CORPORATION i69384.95 BURNER REPLACEMENTS
099674 TAGGIN, WAGGON HOPILHOME PARK f945.9F REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
-091675 .. TAN TAKAMINE - - _ _. __-_ _.__..__ __ .'-'f39760.P9 _ - -. - .. CONTRACT-LANDSCAPING -._
099676 TAYLOR-OUNN 3107.0E TRUCK PARTS
099677 TELEPR000CTS CORP. 1900.00 INSTRUMENT
099676------ -' TICOR-TITLE INSURANCE-- -5750.v0- -_------- - - - - GRANT DEEDS-----------
C99679 TRAVEL TRAVEL $467.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
099680 TRUCK E AUTO SUPPLY, INC. 1502.17 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
FUND NO 9199 47 DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04189 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMHEP AP43
,. ._ ____ _,_, COVNTT EA NITA T I ON. _OI¢_TRI,CTS OF_ORINGE COUNTY.. .,____
' CLAt XS Fp I➢ C!/30/09 POSTING GAT[ r,5/30/P9 �
: JIAP56NT-NNO, __.-.-.._VENDOR........ _.. .
-- ..-_.. --'----'-----
099681 TWINING LABORATORIES S11.02.25 PIPE INSPECTION
..�92682.-._..__..._ -UNA ENIxEERINGr LNG.. ...—._..�5T2G1.k9___,_„ ......ENGINEERING SERVICES P$ 40.___.,_.
099663 UNOCAL $125.86 GASOLINE
099684 THE UNISOUPCE COPP. 1154.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
_VNITCO PARCEL SERVICE_.___
vi
099686 UNTIED T POSTAL gCP VICE f1r26 .63 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
0996d7 URBAN ALTERNATIVES
TIVES fBr 166.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - COMMUNITY OUTREACH FROG
0226A6__.._._YWR S.CI.ENTIF.i C.___ _ s?"A23.55 __LAB %[E LIPS
" 099689 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3,216.06 HARDWARE
099690 VAREC DIVISION f2r158.58 MECHANICAL PARTS :H
... ._.. 5320.13__ ...._.. ..._..LAB SUPPLIES______.___ ... '
VAPIAN (SPRING NT .GROUP__...__....--_ .... _I
099692 VEHICLE SPRING SEPVICE S5113.91 30 TRUCK REPAIRS '^
099693 VERTEX ING SYSTEMS f4 r9]!.']0 COMPUTER PPLIWARE
% 09969i_.._._-___.VILLAG. INDUSTRIAL UR .,3UP_P.Lr _._, -.. ..._. t$63.19___.__ ___ ..-SAFETY-SUPPLIER
ES
C99696 VILLAGE NURSERIES SB3.44 GROUND COVER
09969E JOHTE% INDUSTRIES f5 H35.00 BUILDING REPAIRS
099690._. ... .. WORN R. REPELS .a
.__._ ..._. ____.... . ._ ....._._.___S 535..SS.__...__. . .. _ODOR. CONTROL.-CONSULTING
09969E CART WARREN B CO. f300.J4 LIAR. INSURANCE ADMIN.
W
[99699 WASTE L'4TEP DISPOSAL f30 rl96.29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
rri 95L7CP____._.PAMC D.. _.._.—.._._._11A929.9.9_—.—_ . .. ._.. ...._MECHANICAL_PARTS.._________._.. . ..._.-._.':
= 099701 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY S12r360.60 CAUSTIC SODA H.0.8-10-88
099702 VEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. S440.54 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
u
_W S EOUI REAETALS.INC _--ENGINEERING.SEVCES-.1r 12._.___
09970 OODWAR CLYDE CONSULTANTS , 8. ENGINEERING SERVICES PILE DRIVING
099745 XEROX CORP. $5,449.74 .COPIEN LEASES
n ar
_.��99706.__.._._.__21 EDRRTM._ANO .RLPER.—__..__._._.__.—.-------------___ —___-_._LONSIRUCTIOA_P2�T
TOTAL CLAIMS CAIO. 75/10/69
�a
r]
n
._ __. . ._.. .-.- -.._.__..__. ...._ ...._.._.___._.-._... ....
n
__ ....- .... . . .. ... .. . . . . . .. .. .. . ..___.. . ....... .. .._..... . .. _.. -- -----
-.. .. ._-..
FUND NO 9199 JT DIST CORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/04/89. PACE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COVRTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE WON"
CLAIMS PAID 05/10/89 POSTING DAM 5/10/89
SUMMARY AMOUNT
12 CPU FUND $ 35.18
02 ACO FUND 3,997.51
253.266.95
13 OPER FUND 116.149.38
93 AM FUND 238.070.05_, ,
575.00
fs OPEN FUND 2.485.95
----jLF/R FUND 23,111.83
06 AW FUND 8,394.93
16 F/R FUND 2.500.50
#7 OPER FUND 7.241.42,--
17 AM FUND 31.189.87
07 F/R FUND 61.863.60
#[I OPER FUND
fli-OPER FUND 11.40
0114 ACM MUD 69.760.16
9546 AMOMPID- 351.90,43— .---
CCI #]614 OPER FUND 689.14
JT OPER FUND 752.470.45
SELF FUND" MUM COUP INSURANCE FUND 8,550.72
JT DIST WRKINC CAPITAL FUND 186.147.44
$ 7,237,049.26
J FULD HO ^IL^ - JT :'1ST WOKKII:G CAPIINL GFCCESSING DATE 5/17/P^ PACE I `
RTFORT IIUMBEP AP43
CLAIMS PAID C5/24/8% POSTING DATE G5/24/89
RTATTTIIG
0997G^ ARP PUEIhLSi MOCKIF:ES 321.2E SERVICE AGREEMENT
i', �99TEL^ -RTC-CSn9.88 LON. PAONE-SERViCES�i
0997L1 ADAMSON' UNIFORM E EQUIP. $1.568.15 LAB SUPPLIES
G99762 A I P PRODUCTS P CHEMICAL INC. S4.74R.90 START-UP FEES Ni
[99T6^�RSTRiC'LSSLCT7Ti'S77= r DICMLATCH LH(SES
3547E• AM.F.NICAL CHAIN 6 GCAR [II. 1672.3E PUMP PARTS
ivy 39-765 AMER17ECII 6261.6E COPIER LEASES
�.�i 09976E-- ArmCiM . EWER'AEFdIMAY I
099767 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 32 NI7.I3 WRINGS 6 GASKETS
095768 ELAKC P. AM.DEPSON Li H10.55 MEETING EXPENS¢
r7F9- A-TCVrSyc7llf. . TCbNUTICEE �.
m P9g774 ARLTEY SERVICES, IAC. 15,791.84 UNIFORM RENTALS Iaa.
095771 AICMOLAS ARHONIES 1316.75 TRAINING A MEETING EXPENSE
1:•. -L9c77 .OUMC r.
uq 099773 ASSOCIATED BAG CO. $66.15 OPERATING SUPPLIES lu
099774 P L K PRECISION 585.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
RX7—PSr K.U.GHIT REMOVAL _�
^9-776 NANM OF A%r-ICA •1FSA 111 &INK CARDS •"
H..ti i91777 P.A. RIPOTTI A:.D ASEC.C. 15.640.3D CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P2-33.34.12.37 ly'
•.
W YVl7K—Eros YCEtfPxA
D 095779 b. 6ATCMAN 1575.00 DEFERRED COMB DISTRIBUTION
Ralf 4997b9 BATTERIES NEST. IH.C. 2419.89 TRUCK PARTS
99TET L. .. PP s
• 1 0997PP PE1.7 ENGINEfRIG6• I%C. $67.42 COMPRESSOR PARTS
09c 7P3 ELAC4 P94 CGPF S882.75 COMPUTER HARDWARE
lV9TFC VUTST-CCbLALL UVtILL FFUUULIL 4 u
Ba 099785 EONNCVILLC ECUIF.. INC. 14.T90.Ut CRANE SAFEtt CERTIFICATES
pa Og9766 BOYLE FNGINEERING COOP $137,699.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES 14-I
M. D9^TF7 PO7LTJib:'"NENSTZR _ BLICATIOH
0q^76M PUP6C ENGINEERING CO. 3162.71 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
w T9g769 PUHv AGO ASSOCIATES. INC. $1,1121.65 LAND SURVEYING M.0.6-8-88 .•I
P. ,.95T90-�itRrC-S BEME o'
C9F791 C A R RECONDITIOMINC. CO. $390.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
erl-099792 CS [OxF ANY 315.54 OXYGEN SUPPLIES
�.,, C n79} [RLDYC:7C'SYSTCR • E-WVPLZES
899794 CILIROL . I::C. SM89.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
09 796 JnyL CANOLL, C1:61HC1PS $1a1A,494.Y9 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34.P1-20.J-15 r
s79FTMF • • - - ql
9g797 C14EVPOK U.S.A.. INC, $2.551.68 OIL 6 GREASE
09979A CLARK CONSULTANTS $2.640.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
PuRrfAwf-
f^Sopt CO•nh[S`OH CGMI"DY.LNTS OF CALIF 12.725.DC GEARS 6 CHAIN
wl 095AC1 COh3OLIDATEl. LLECTAICAL PISI. 56.552.1E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
��'198V2 -CfINSOLYI
jLol C9960} COSTA -ESA AUTO SUPPLY $265.51 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
A04 COUNTY WHOLESALE LLECTPIC $1,086.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ae.
m
IIa,
FUND AO 919u _ JI :LIST LOPRINL CFI'IYAL PROCESSING DFTE 5/17/89 PACE pL
REPORT OUMRFR AP43
+ CL AINS P<IU i5/24/89 POSTING DATE LS/2Y/09
I+
nl
095099 CLL YlTEu $312.52 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
n` ITSING
�
0999D7 0ENIEL0 TIRE SERVICE .2 TIMES 099 HGP OETIIR Ik AND/OR CS CC. $3,953 33.953.23 VALVE PARTS
.-.�11e r�'T'�T'LTEL�•'OLT•2R 5F 9 FF ffiI[Ctl[C 20LIIIER p 0 6 10 EB
n, f.99,1i. DORN-OLIVER. IOC.
ix49.79 MECHANICAL PARTS
P 99A11 OYF^,SCR IUDUSTRIP4. ILC. 52.472.29 MECHANICAL PARTS,
u"UIC-DONK-K . 1L
Sul Pl9k13 CAS70"AN• INC. 52.935.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES
k 99n14 LeEPIIARD EDUIPMFAT 546.00 TRUCK PARTS IR
599N6 Llr^PT CORD 12.74V•DL PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE laa.
D9ce17 'INFINEE-TAG NEW' P1COF1. 070.C: PUBLICATION b.
--paap3p----k P N..TT CIIYL L--fTRCI'.pR 1Y2 f[i592.2i LEGAL 6E1[0[CE$ in
p,J 699619 JEFP ESUER 2130.08 MILEAGE EXPENSE la.
099P20 HIASHALL FAIPPES $340.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
c.'TTT-09552E-__.-IMMIX •':'"F"X'CRM TETL o _ _ - i>
X 09SF22 FCDPPAL CIPPESS CORP ., 2336.0C AlR FREIGHT Hr.
C99A23 FEFRE,LLGAR $29.25 PROPANE
as
¢: 099e25 FISCHER S PORTER"CC. 09 a62.9R CHLORINATION PARTS
I-I 099e26 FOUMLIN VALLEY CAMERL $302.04 FILM 1"
c '9 C:"21---1'11T Tf�T 6UFi T'BTE FL CSa ..I.. DSEBGE
1 19Pr2k illUhillA VALE CY TLI P'i 2724.2E PAINT SUPPLIES
u:. N 199929 VG FDYPORO Co. S4.346.+7 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
i� a7i--FRL'A
499A31 FR HEM.UI DIVISION 112,455.81 TRUCK REPAIRS a
D99032 CITY OF FULLERTON 598.21 WATER USEAGE �u
99P33-"""--GEUERt-TlCLFMC¢T C . fei IBG.IB fECEF ROflE p
395s34 LIFHLItw FITCMCLL. 1:1. S1•944.05 PUMP PARTS P+
695k35 J.P. GLASC. INC.. 5511.5. TRAINING VIDEO I�
"IrSe- Put NO Co 311,11b.24
lac•I 099837 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $331.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
I+. 099e3R TORY GU71ERPEZ $116.02 TRAINING EXPENSE I•a,
p-'-'C99R39-- "-H:PI-Cp1•iTh1 52.446..P 'BOTLER 60PPLIES
H. 9e44 FPEU A. HARPER 11.456.66 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
09R1,41 H11E11 P. KIRK♦ INC. 15.577.43 MECHANICAL PARTS
.af-OSSRi'.INTCT, • AR
0 0.43 HOLNRIGER C.V.S. CALIF. • INC. s5B7.95 COMPRESSOR PARTS a,
C99044 0014ALD 0. MONOMICHL 5300.PO DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ,
_---199oY5�._..___�i•II^f'-OP-7!LTTCRI .,
599A46 P.r_ OVUHEE CO.. IA1, S857.2L HARDWARE C+
'194F41 CITY EF HU4TINCTOFi 1•1.1" $14.31 WATER USEAGE a�
�:.I C99EiF--11UNT7NGTTR"VPITTC7"SCFIWFAIETT IY..
C99F49 HYOROTEk AT.
41,:13 TEST EQUIPMENT Ix
099b5L ENIERPO ISE ENGINE HIV• $46.71 FREIGHT
I.. _ _.__ _ In
_i FUND NO el nu _ JT FIST VON I AG CAPITAL PNOCCSSILC DATE 5/37/89 -AGE
RI PORT NUMREA AF4.1
CLA1M5 PRIG 95/24/P.4 POSTING DATE C5/24/M9 a;
I+
µ 799651 IECD C09PA.ry 34.J66.0' LAB SUPPLIES �.
i—�J99R5�—]11RT$TpTAE-TpR�RDT-D-FRUFUM COSMIC..
I.� p99653 J A I. SCIENTIFIC 1474.66 LAB SUPPLIES
ui 099N54 PI VI EPA FINANCE 1301.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
�� . ^,95656 JO!!ES I STORES ASROC..IAC. 44a729.4F CONSULTING SERVICES RES 88-27 I
6.2 P95657 FAMAY PEAPINGS 1 SUPPLY 3993.91 FITTINGS El
099L'55 XEEIG AN SUPPLY S1,13$2,004.16 MACHINE
PARTS
C 49M bP KING GEARING, INC. 32...1.16 IIACNINB SUPPLIES
C95FFT--.6p ONSTRUCTCOMP ORVICES
. 095662 AFTIN AOflhlCn, 5F $2.583.4f. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-29,5-10 C
G954E2 LA MPTTL CMLMICIL FPODUCTS 7185.se CHEMICALS
095M65 LIFEOOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPI LY $474.41 CYLINDER REPAIRS
C998E6 LIMITONIAUE CORP. 1I.J82.89 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS N. '
xTFT�7TFL'�—rI Cl CO. sb. .AlARTTOF;T/;L30FRLT
u;X 044M66 MCC APP LIEF CNVIPDNMENTAL 1585.6t OCEAN MONITORING - LAB SERVICES
._-. 699869 FDS 16.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS y
e 99'2T . OCRAPIfIT^SaIVICES
I99A71 MS DATA SERVICE CORN. S12729 DATA TRANSFERS a•
nl-I 095872 MAILTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. $661:76, FILTER PRODUCTS Ix
095n 1a All - C1LOP. INC. $373.1: CHLORINATION PARTS
u W P99075 •CMASTf9-CAPP SUPPLY FG. $83.11 SHAFT SUPPLIES
--'-`C956TE:YF'CN'FATLF
G95P77 MEDLIN CONNGLS CO. $101.83 GAUGE •.
p99878 MICROAGE COMPUTER $251642,52 SOPTNARE/C.OMPUTERS
MICR'OSGFT . 7CF FCA-r1^-T - . ••
n9 LMM; MIOLa ND MFG. CCAF. 1646.12 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES I'^,
C 956M1] MILL IPDFC ALD 2F l'AT ERs 1129.1N LAB SUPPLIES
'-1.952P?--'PIPE-SCFET�A9FCTFFCF.TC U S; DZE'00 SIIF EI9 80PFC
b., Cn9bb3 JAKES E. MCATGOMIRY 512.628.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES - FOUL AIR SCRUBBERS
0w9M84 MOTION INL'USTPIES, INC. $2.308.]5 HARDWARE
FP9--...MUFPe!1-DnDIrCO'. .. . OOK KEPLA�. a:.
E94"t NAT1691L FLACC ..FNTALS 5566.I.3 FENCING Ise;
j.: 0R5FP7 NATIONAL LUM6EP $530.16 HARDWARE
CVSTTSF —MA?t 211C. VANM 099689 REAL SUPPLY CO. ICES, 5842.55 PIPE 6 PITTINGS �w
099b9p NCVANM ELECTRONICS 34R.P6 INSTRUMENT PARTS lu
---p99F 9T -_..__.OFPKL='t-A1wCTa!T CPTC -
P90E92 GLYPPIC CFF•ICAL C?. 543.677.46 CHLORINE M.O. 10-12-88 u.
RDSEET J. CCTEF. 3297.9E TRAINING EXPENSE
��59E99 —ORANTC s.:
f 59695 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PANTS CO. SI40.22 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS h'
C99696 _ OHAhGF VALVL L FITTING CO. 5289.14 FITTINGS jM,;
172
Ca
_I FUND AD nl"• - JT Flil FCRMINL LAI IIIL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/89 PAGE A `
REPORT NUMBER AP43
la CLAIMS PAID 65/24/99 POSTING DATE Q5/24/8913
4tFtY. .
°i C99697 DSCAP•E LOCn I SAFE 5130.Q2 LOCI( 6 KEYS rl
�9Rms— * r 59 w'0�—SPECIALTY GASES
9894 COUNTY OF ORANGE $36:100:60 DISPOSAL GATE FEES
ie1 G9590G COUNTY Of GRANGE S10 rO G0.00 CLAIM 5]-66-]8 I1i'
E IROTIOF
09991.2 PACIFIC FAR 1S $1 067.43 PUMP PARTS
fi 9a901 PACIFIC SAFETY ELUIPRELI Cl II.534.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES I��I
L I019
099905 FACTCL CELLULAP 373.58 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES I•r
09H90E FARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $434.37 MECHANICAL PARTS
.9H9^r—.._—ROT-Pf Y.LEFM>PTs4konsPERRED'COM@TTSTRTHPIION
f9994N SA0 W, FCTF.F.SOI: I. ASSCC. 37,771.9E ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-II-3
099909 P••DTO 1 SOUNC C(l. 3391.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES tr�
:�„---pH H91"P----P'fNP-GR'D-STtTCMS . . EMOVAL-MV-5-r-SS
09991) FITNEY ROY ES S126.80 SCALE REPAIR
095912 FLAINS TRUEVALUE HAPDUARE $163.30 HARDWARE ?'
'¢[X—C9^51t—_--_—FLIT-PtP 9RYY3 —DVAvINClDITLRIAL w�
a;s 099914 FOLYFUMF. INC. 133.538.65 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-8-89 i"
_ 09-19 FOWFR ELECTED SUPPLY LD. 0312.5P ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
v.T7T-09^9]'6�D4'P-TDEL'-C7NEFR"FTMCUC S sibno INS aA
u99917 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $4,000.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88 la.
09951A PULSAFf EDEP 3481.05 PUMP PARTS
a.(y 0v991T' —PDP.TN.• •. rPUMP JANLb
QUALITY PUILDIr.0 SUPPLY 174.94 BUILDING MATERIALS >•'
o � nva9Z'. PAINFOV DISIOSIL C1 . 1744.56 TRASH DISPOSAL
--rECY . r . CETENOVACN:9:T=ti�E �
ia: 099923 FEE) YINC SIICES 11B2.03 SAFETY SHOES
u.' 1vn924 PERCCY TEMP 12,136.44 TEMPORARY SERVICES
9T](AE
• -IP7 IMF Cfr ORE IC RIIPFLY f.4. 11.21A.3 PIPE 6 FITTINGS
C 9.9P7 PIC OH CORE 1661.G: COPIER LEASES
IFIYO1,-CJRPDFA :, sYS. R-LEREE n
099929 J. R. ROPEPTS CGFP. 1211,305.58 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4
19."f. SANTA ANI FLECIRIC MOTORS $331.66 ELECTRIC MOTOR e;
or
:a
....._ . . . t9,1n33 ._._.._..___YVONM. SCHl'A iT .2 3 RREPINI A.EA.AE lea
SEn-LIMC ELIC7%CI,IL'F, INC. 35,565.JC OFFICE MACHINE
3EA COAST DSS IC G£ a45.6G OFFICE REPAIRS lee
.Y.y'TirI PIT$IICp—. IN( UP
... C9nv3f• SOIL IND TESTING FNGINE ERS 3416.00 SOIL TESTING
095n36 $0. COAST AIP QUALITY $7.667.00 PERMIT FEES °e
.."_. ALP9n^17 —"""""Str.-TOFY.T"ATP":L'eEfT-- —i �w G: -
,. ?9993R SCU T t. CALIF. FDISOS CO. 1164,671.69 POWER �•�
099939 $ll. CAL.Al. GAS CD. i5.I61.116 NATURAL GAS °1
•.—C9?9P0.--�0—CA L'tl'—EPT SEAL �o
099941 SPARNLF7TS DPINMIMC•NATE0 31,550.23 DRINKING WATER/CDOLER RENTAL
I.0 09e952 ` SPEC TECH WFSTEPN $332.84 WELDING SUPPLIES l
im
o In.ie
I,71 p
ice.—__.__ ...
J FUNP NO -I-- . JT !'1ST ROPVIBC CAPITAL gPOCFSSINb DCTO 5/17/M' PAGF `
SIT PFPOPT PIUVREP APq!
xl CLAIMS FAID 05/24/R9 POSTING DOTE O9/24/119 •,
�I_`I-pxRP
I" 09^943' ;• SPECIAL (LAST I C. SYSILMS. INC. $65.72 TUBING
9".4T SP7'EyC-EPETUUM T
A 99945 STAROW STEEL $232.91 METAL
G999A6 STAR TOOL A SUPPLY CO. $498.6q TOOLS
r.. .
G9 o+•94 SU9HIT Si ECL S2.tl71.7t METAL
L: 049.4q SUVSFT FOPU S15.1'1 TRUCK PARTS
—U99950-' SUT*IITUIt•TilTErt Svu,p • TREE . i�
099951 IML SUPPLICAS 111457.66 TOOLS/XAROWARE
In_099952 SURVIVRIR $325.01 ANNUAL INSPECTION
Cq"! --T=TRaTR7b _ .. .. N
rXT-
",5. TAVLOP-DUNN $173.24 ELECTRIC CART PARTS lu
P99n55 TECH-C.F.S.SORIES $52.-, OFFICE SUPPLIES
H.�C99999557 -" THL14 M OF-ANAL VATN ICpL♦ INC./NOPUL fTS72.0Ut— LLABAB 5SU2RPPVLICEE8S
099956 TILLINGHAST 11.100.3G CONSULTING SERVICES
CT7T-09"�93p T"SST IRUDI-CL -
(9q^6L T4 U(.q A AUTL SUFI IV. INC. l949.g4 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
= OSC-61 J.L. 7UCRFR 1 301.• lhL. 16075.16 ANALYZER PARTS
:., 99563 UET4-SER y
09-963 USITEO PARCEL SERVICE 4319.75 PARCEL SERVICES •�
x+ 1 09996q 0.hI T E0 WESTERN T.LCVATOP 1319.75 MAINTENANCE ACREPJ(!NT
SAFETY
09, 9GE VWI GCIINTIIIC 851$6,722.71, LAB SUPPLIES
\jT 69ggFt vALLfY CITI'S AVI P $4•tlSI LY CC. 44 .00 HAROWAR!/FITTINGS :°
---T9996R VacCCTT9TSTtJ • PONCHMCK-9011MES
j 1194964 VISTA FAINT CORF. 1620.19 PAINT SUPPLIES
n: C99970 L'ELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE $2.716.89 SECURITY SERVICES
IVEM117SUFFLIES u. 9197•! WILLPAN ASSCCIIIE6 321.242.34 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-2.2-27
n597a k(IURME 6 W(.C.OPUFF 132.613.5P LEGAL SERVICES M.O. 10-14-87
;;r�C999T4---N'CA'OFTO SEE—
la.� 09-975 GEORGE VARDL[Y ASSOCIATES $193.70 VALVE ee
D99976 APTHUH YOU NC 55.993.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
-----------------
�+ I(.TAL CLAIP9 IAln C5/24/Y9 41.7J9,436.50
-----------------
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIV WORKING CAPI'rAl. PROCESSING DATE 05/17/89 PACE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMUML-012A Q -POSTING-➢dam
is
al II OPER FUND S 16.56
a 92. OPEF/K FUND
F2 F/E
NU 12.701.13
66
07 OPER FUND I2.322.69
I.-. 05 AGO.FUND
FUN ......_.__— —__ _ .088.55 _ n•
95 OPER FUND 41088.55
1" PS F/R FUND 156.00
i' 6 AGO FUND 8.165.69 9
6 F/R FUND 27.168.32 >.
"' .. 02.OPER POND_ ....__ .. . , . _._._.. . . .. >'
/7 ACO FuttU ����� 21,688.91
4 , 17 F/R FUND 287.24
111.OPER EUND. _.. ._..._._—_.__.—__.
u X 913 OPER FUND 4.88
014 AGO FUND 56,258.71 '
9566..OPFA FUND..._.____ _.._ 2,895.70 la.
s:
0566 AGO FUND 2.660.70 :.
0667 DOPE FUND 85.27
F.t= JT OP_OP.FR FUND.---- _......_. _._._..___ ..2,785.27___
P�; 11J JT OPER POND 525.145.87
1° CDRF 525,145.87 u
n. 01 .a.
...__BELP_PKING MORTARS CONP_IdSUR1BCE1dtlD 8,233.25_.._.. .... ..._...._ _ '•
JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 158.295.52
u
�_ai.. ... .. .___.. ..._ .. $1,709.436.50
p.. .x
i.
I>
ni
i
�I
>I a
Ivn
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
JULY 12, 1989
1) UPCOMING MEETINGS
A. ADJOURNED JOINT BOARD MEETING - FOLLOWING TONIGHT'S
MEETING THE BOARDS WILL ADJOURN TO NEXT WEDNESDAY,
JULY 19TH, AT 7: 30 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE FINAL EIR ON
THE DISTRICTS' ACTION PLAN, AND A DECISION ON THE
LEVEL OF TREATMENT TO INCLUDE IN OUR APPLICATION TO
EPA AND THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD FOR
RENEWAL OF THE DISTRICTS ' OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT.
THE MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE FOUNTAIN VALLEY
COMMUNITY CENTER, BEHIND CITY HALL.
STAFF WILL SEND MAPS WITH THE AGENDA MATERLAL FOR
THE MEETING.
B. CANCELLATION OF JULY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING -
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WAS TENTATIVELY SET TO MEET
JULY 20TH INSTEAD OF JULY 26TH.
HOWEVER, THERE IS NO NEED FOR THE EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE TO MEET THIS MONTH SO I AM CANCELLING THE
JULY MEETING.
-END OF REPORT-
-I-
MEETING DATE 7/12/89 _TIME 7:30 D•m.DISTRICTS 1 ,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13 6 14
DISTRICT 1 'lft A JOINT BOARDS
(CRANK). .....HANSON...... ✓ rMR8Y ........ ....
VERELLEN).........ALLEN....... ✓
(YOUNG)........GR13ET....... ge_ GA E E N)............BANNISTER...3
(KENNEDY).....!YAr• wY... DAA)........ ....iiWWWiGY....
(dOTX)........ .iTAIYTOII..... ) CAMIN...,,,�
_ (PERTY)........ . ...C ULVER.......
DISTRICT 2 (PENNY).......... ..EDGER........
YA (CHESSEV)..........EDGAR........
(WORRY)...VV....--11 CP TLIN......✓ L (CHE SSEN I..........CRIFF 3N.....JG
(GRAHAMI.CDMNA ONEY..... y_ (YOUNG)............GRISET......_��
(MEDAAI...... ..00908NH...� Y (CRANK)............HANSON......_Al
(YOUlIG 1.. .,�,f�RI SEI .....� (KENNEDY)..... .....IAWifi6AEV...=
(NELSON LI-���W!K 1/ (NELSON)...........iGli6.......
(SCOTT)........ AL........7 ( )............KAREL........
. (DOWNEY).......NEWTON......-G _ _� (EDGER)............KENNEDY....
. _
(CULYER(.......PERRY.......i �L (GRPHAM)...........MAHONEY.....
(HUNTER).......PICHLER.....�C aL (SILVA)............MAYS........
(FASBENDER)....SILZEL....... _ (SCOTT).......:....14EAL........JC
(BARRERA)......SMIIH....... (WEDIN)............NELSON...... ✓_
(ROTH).........SiANTON..... • (DONNEY)...........NEWiON......JC _
(CULVER)...........PERRY.......JG
DISTRICT 3 (HUNTER)...........PICHLER......
(HART)........ .....PLUMMER..... _
(DUKE).........POLIS ......� Y (DUKE).............POLIS.......� _
(WEDIN)........NELSON...... (STANTON)..........ROTH........�
(VERELLEN)... ..ALLEN....... (AGRAN)............SHERIDAN.... _
(GREEN)...... ..BANNI3T4R... _� (WILE S)............SIEFEN......�
(NORBY).... .. . .CATLIN.. ...._✓ V (FASBENDER)........SILIEL...... r.
(PERRY)........CULVER......1G (BARRERA)..........SMITH.......7 _
(CHESSER)... ...GRIFFIN.. ...
J� (ROTH).............iTANiON.....
(YOUNG)........CR13ET...... ✓ (HART/COX).........STRAUSS.....
( )........KAREL.......JG (MILLER)...........SWAN........aL
(GRAHAM).......MAHONEY.....JC (WAHLSLROM)........SYLVIA......_K
(SCOTT)........REAL........JG (FERRYMAN/GREEN)...WANNER.... ..JL
(HUNTER).......PICHLER.....AG _ (9IGONGER).........WEDAA.......JL
(WILES/........ilEFEN..... .J� (ISLES)............WEDIN.......yG _
(ROTH).........STA MIDN..... fy (SAGAS)............WILSOH......
(WAHLSTROM) SYLVIA......J.�— 7— (BANNIiTFR)........WINCHEL_.... _
(GRGAS)... ... ..'a ILSOH......JC
DISTRICT 5 STAFF:
SYIVESfER... ✓
(HART)......... ..... ANDERSON....3v[(HART).........STRAUSS..... BROWN.......(STANTON)......ROTH........A6, CLARKE......
CLAWSON.....J�,
DISTRICT 5
F IL ECCI4....__
(FERRYMAH).... ..AHNER...... ✓ HODGES......
(HART)...... ...PLUMMER......
'Av� KYLE........J,e
(STANTON'. .....ROTH........yryL LINDER.......
OOTSN.......�L
D)STRICT 7 BTREE D......_Lg!!r
— VON
ANGER
( E )......SMITH........✓ Nli15OR......
(KENNDY ......EDGER......
(YOUNG)........ _n A_.•_ J. 1U1
ROTH ET...... �w.KO ir�Wc�V
(STANTON)
........SHERIDA .... '
(PCRPN)...... ..STRAUSS.....
(Cox)..........iTRRU55.....
(GREEN).........YARNER...... L�
OTHERS: waooauFF.... ✓
DISTRICT It � IDE.........JL
/� ANWAR.......
0 �
(SILVA)........MAYS........ J•^`^"'O DENIM.........
(BANNISTER)....WINCHELL.... PEENING.......�
(ROTH).........STANTON..... .p^��1 HOH .....ROUGUGHE.R......
DISTRICT 13 HOWARD......Z
�yI HUNT........
(BIGONGER).....WEDAE....... ✓ l� KNOPF.......jz
(HUNTER).......PICKLER..... LINDSTROM..._
(STANTON)......ROTH........ LYNCH.......
(BARRERA)......SMITH......... STONE.......
(ISLES)........WEDIN....... J l_ WASON.......�
YOUNG......._
DISTRICT 16
��✓ '(MILLER)......
MILLER).......SWAN.....
EDGAR)........KENNEDY.....
(STANTON)......ROTH ...
(SARAN)........SHERIAN... ✓ �•YT.� om, Wr.�.'-_v— /(A4Y^
(BARRERA)......
SMITH
....... G /
Ji_Uw
YI
06/15/89
JULY 12, 1989
PLEASE SIGN IN
/ NAKE AGENCY/FIRM
- /
/�/��bG < L � C, 'F z vxa 'r F-a ANC
1`0I be hf p , -/, i ebe r ,+.i A ,✓/i ev+/-i 6h e;f�e" TNc-
- /JL«uJ � �rCA �j �J('z Mai • �e✓ /AI'G
' Cl��'e�//t/� ��/4 U/YC'- GLjS UYrle �vY GXtt( �ieb�jm yt a�
10E 4, E6 d f�� ✓A.vt'o C'e.v,r r, c Pd+-t
d9L SSON
Job.
l(�7 vicra9 ��er e-y S1,ti Ca�ollo �.n�,.,eers
IQ e,7-56h.reidi- Jph / Coroi/o G v9 vrvs
T5FF 4DU.4rlcv CCV-S7A? cM.s 7-
- S'Cuc� TCE
L,.d� csDo�
lZ C K1 �0
- GG/KR GC J D Ro urge d Gfioa d r� z<�
— �jl(✓(- F/il�iY✓6lNli �l�w� � crq�ow•Ew �n1G+eS-
T� &a-cle c f1Ke -s
e,
/l
(won Linen t•a.{ �rykcs
7-12-89 JOINT MEETING NOTES
N5 - Public Comments
The Chairman recognized Mr. Everett Maguire of Maguire, Toghia & Orbach, and Mr.
Art Santana of Monteleone & McCrory, both Attorneys at Law, who wished to speak
relative to agenda item No. 13 (protest re award of Job No. PI-34-2).
N6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman
The Joint Chairman announced that the joint Boards would be adjourning to
Wednesday, July 19th, at 7:30 p.m. to consider the Final EIR on the Districts'
Action Plan, and a decision on the level of treatment to include in their
application to EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for renewal of
the Districts' ocean discharge permit. The meeting will be held in the Fountain
Valley Community Center behind City Hall . Staff will send maps with the agenda
material for the meeting. He added that he hoped all the Directors realize how
important the July 19th meeting is.
He then said he wanted to remind the Directors that just five years ago this
month, they selected a new General Manager, and that he didn't need to tell them
what a fine job he has done. On July 9, 1959, Wayne first came to work in a
position called "casual laborer". The Joint Chairman and former Joint Chairman
Norm Culver then presented Wayne Sylvester with a 30-year pin. The General
Manager thanked the Directors for their support and stated that working with
them is truly a pleasure.
Chairman Smith then advised that the Executive Committee meeting was tentatively
set to meet on July 20th instead of July 26th. However, there is no need for a
meeting this month, so he cancelled the July meeting.
#6(b) - Report of the General Manager - no report
B6(c) - Report of the General Counsel
The General Counsel indicated that he wanted to comment on two items. Two
people have indicated they wanted to address the Board re agenda item No. 13.
He noted that staff and consultants will comment on that item at the time it
comes up.
He added that Directors had received a summary re election of the Joint Chairman
and Vice Joint Chairman. Each District will caucus and select the candidate of
their choice and each District will cast just a single vote.
M13(b) - Re protest on award of Job No. P1-34-2
Tom Dawes gave a brief overview of the project. This is the first of three
major projects that will increase the treatment plant capacity. He noted that
the Districts received six bids ranging from $19 million to $23 million. After
the bids were received, we received a protest from one of the suppliers.
The General Counsel reported that the Directors had received in advance the full
staff report including letters of protest filed by Putzmeister and other
correspondence, staff report and memorandum from the General Counsel . This is
not a formal hearing tonight but two attorneys representing Advanco and
Putzmeister wished to address the Board. The basis of the appeal is set forth
in the protest letter. It raises a variety of issues. On hard examination, it
is our opinion that the protest is not really on point. They have indicated
that there is a failure on the part of Advanco to name a supplier on the bid
documents, which is true. However, their request to do that is a matter of
record. We are talking about naming an equipment supplier, not a subcontractor.
There is not a similar provision relating to the supplying of equipment, parts
or materials. For convenience, clarity and information of the Districts, we
required and requested contractors to name who they plan to use as suppliers.
The bottom line in terms of listing a supplier is it is irrelevant. It is a
defect that can be and should be waived by the Board.
They have also alleged that the pumps are not equal and this will be addressed
by the Districts' Engineer, Bill Knopf. There is no legal requirement that a
part that is specified by us be absolutely •equal°. We try to get parts,
supplies and materials that could be provided by more than one manufacturer.
The Districts realize the benefit of a strong competitive manufacturer. The
choice of one manufacturer of one supplier of a part or an item of material
rests solely and exclusively with the contractor, provided he chooses one that
we have speced as meeting the mimimum requirements. Advanco had two different
suppliers to choose from--Schwing and Putzmeister. They chose Schwing. He
added that it is gust Putzmeister's opinion that the parts are not equal . Our
Engineer will explain the procedure that they went through to evaluate
equipment. They named only those two because they determined it critical that
whoever had the service capability had to be in North America. Putzmeister was
included on the bid list. We have Putzmeister pumps in operation and are very
satisfied with them. The selection boils down to the contractor.
Finally, there has been an issue raised about the timeliness of the appeal.
Mr. Knopf will comment on that also. The protest was not filed with the
Districts until a couple hours before the last Board meeting. The Districts'
Engineer had had 20 contacts with Putzmeister over the last year. If they felt
there was a technical defect in the specifications, they should have brought it
to the attention of the Districts before we opened the bids.
Everett W. Maguire, of Maguire, Toghia & Orbach, representing Putzmeister, then
addressed the Board. He stated that the bid documents prepared by the Districts
are supposed to be competitive and equal to everyone. The low bidder did not
list his manufacturer. He found out he was low and it gave him an advantage to
bargain with manufacturer. Cited New York cases where this was unlawful.
Public Contract Code Section 3400 requires all public agencies in the State of
California to specify in their bid documents if they know over two manufacturers
that are equal , they must list those and say 'or equal". These specifications
state alternative manufacturers are not acceptable. Said he had gone through
this before. If the award is illegal , the contractor won't get the bid.
Taxpayers can sue and get money back. Said he represented taxpayers also.
Directors asked who they were and he responded: Allen Gray, Westminster, Bob
Swan, Anaheim; and Bob Lebberman, Anaheim.
He requested a public hearing to take testimoney and determine if, in fact,
there are only two manufacturers in the world that can do this. Said he thought
it was important to the taxpayers.
Director Griffin commented that he indicated that the provisions of the
specifications were illegal and yet your company was listed. Why did you not
bring that to the attention of the engineers of the District? He replied that
he wrote a letter as soon as he found out about the problem. The bids had
already been taken.
\.OV -2-
Director Polis asked if it weren't true that the two pump manufacturers we
talked about have repair centers in North America? He was told that was
correct. He further noted to Mr. Maguire that the Districts were interested in
repair availability and capability.
Tom Woodruff added that Mr. Maguire did not note exceptions to Contracts Code
Section 3400. One of which is if the District or city has a unique situation,
they don't even have to proceed in accordance with other requirements of
Section 3400. This went through an examination process for over many months.
The determination was made that it was absolutely critical to have this service
capability. The Board approved the plans and specifications several months ago.
Obviously, Directors don't read every line of every specification, but once the
plans and specs are approved by the Board, they are determined to be
appropriate. The challenge should have been made a long time ago.
Director Culver asked who the second low bidder specified and was told that all
the rest of the bidders indicated Schwing.
Director Allen comment that he was concerned about the supplier going to an
attorney after the bids were opened. TLW added that Maguire is saying that we
should have set Schwing, Putzmeister or equal .
Sheridan asked, if they have a superior product, why didn't other contractors
list them? Was there a reason? Mr. Maguire responded that basically, a Chevy
is cheaper than a Cadillac.
Director Hanson stated that from what he understood, this organization is unique
and we have the right to call for whatever equipment we want. If we have that
right, we don't have to have those wards "or equal".
TLW stated that we have to adhere to the same provisions of State Law as any
other agency but there is the basic rule and there are exceptions to the rule.
Director Silzel commented that the fact that we have a four-day holding tank for
sludge and have to rely on that, makes it very reasonable that there would be a
need for repair parts in North America which could be obtained immediately or we
would be in trouble. Said he couldn't see any reason why we can't specify
something if it is essential to the operation.
Armand DeWeiss of Advanco introduced Art Santana of Montelone & McCrory,
attorneys representing Advanco. Mr. Santana noted that the points had been
pretty well covered by staff, counsel and Board members. With regard to
requirement for listing of supplier, Advanco had, in fact, on the day that the
bids were due failed to insert Schwing and at 11:01 A.M. confirmed that they
would be using Schwing.
Re Statute 3400, there are exceptions to that statute. The Districts have a
unique piece of equipment. There is really no reason not to award this
contract. He also commented on the total untimeliness of their protest. They
had the plans and specifications in February and new that bids were to be
received May 23rd. They waited until June 14th to file a protest. Such a
protest should be filed prior to when the bids are opened. Reiterated that he
thought this Board was certainly within its rights to award the contract.
-3-
Bill Knopf of John Carollo Engineers then addressed the Board and explained the
staff's procedures to comply with all requirements of the law and give all
bidders a free and equal opportunity to compete. He reported that they started
on this project in the Spring of 1988. Their studies indicated that the sludge
cake method was the recommended method of moving sludge. He added that it is
` generally their practice to specify "or equal" but they had some specific
`..i reasons to not allow "or equal " on this job. The Districts have been using
Putzmeister pumps at Plant 2. We wanted competition for Putzmeister. They set
up two basic criteria to evaluate manufacturers: (1) Had to be in North America
and have service available in North America and (2) Had to have operating
installations of similar capacity in North America.
To verify experience worldwide, they did a telephone survey and covered over 40
different users in North America and Europe. They actually visited
installations in North America. He said they were in regular contact with
Schwing and Putzmeister. Had over 20 written contacts and many more informal
contacts. The draft specifications were given to Putzmeister and Schwing and
they were both asked to review them. Comparing the two pumps, based on volume
and strokes per minute or speed, the actual difference is only 10%. Both can
deliver the same capacity. The differences are very small . Putzmeister had
Indicated that they would not be submitting a bid unless the specifications were
competitive and they did submit a bid. He added that they understand that
there was less than a 5% difference in equipment prices. They feel they
provided for competition.
Director Kennedy referred to the June 14th letter from Mr. Maguire where he
charges that the specifications permit Schwing to build a hybrid pump that has
never been built before and questioned that statement. Mr. Knopf responded that
manufacturer interchangedly uses different parts depending on the capacity they
want to deliver. Model 40 includes parts from Model 25 and Model 50.
Winchell commented on their examination of installations. Schwing says they
have not done this particular combination before. How could they examine this
model. Bill Knopf replied that they examined Models 25 6 50 but not actually
one like Model 40.
Director Swan moved item 13(d)(1) and (e). Motion seconded by Catlin. Catlin
commented that he believed the legal argument is between Putzmeister and
Advanco. Felt the public interest could be supported by the Boards' action.
Kennedy commented that she hoped that we can guard against this in the future.
She said she felt a little uncomfortable because it was very technical.
CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. VOICE VOTE. MOTION CARRIED.
M7 - Election of Joint Chairman
It was moved and seconded that nominations for Joint Chairman be closed.
Ronald B. Hoesterey, who was nominated at the June 14th meeting, was elected
unanimously.
M8 - Election of Vice Joint Chairman
Sally Ann Sheridan nominated Buck Catlin for Vice Joint Chairman.
Robert Hanson nominated Richard Polis for Vice Joint Chairman.
It was moved and seconded that nominations be closed. The Districts then
-4-
caucused and submitted their votes to the General Counsel who announced that
Buck Catlin had been elected Vice Joint Chairman.
Chairman Smith commented that he had really enjoyed acting as Joint Chairman and
before that, Vice Joint Chairman. Will miss it. It has been a great pleasure.
He said he still plans to be around a while as Chairman of District 7. Thanked
the Directors for the privilege of serving as Joint Chairman.
In the absence of the newly-elected Joint Chairman Hoesterey, Vice Chairman
Catlin chaired the rest of the meeting. He announced that his election to the
post of Vice Chairman had left the Chairmanship of District No. 2 vacant and
nominations were, therefore, in order. Director William Mahoney was nominated
and elected Chairman of District No. 2. Inasmuch as he was previously Chairman
pro tem, it was appropriate to elect a new Chairman pro tem. Director Ron Isles
was then nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of District No. 2.
-5-
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
JULY 12, 1989
A7,GN
9 tea.u.v O` GIaT
six. as y
GRANGE CGVt
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on July 12, 1989, at 7:30 p.m.,
in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation
the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6,
7, 13 and 14 as follows:
\ , ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
�•s� DISTRICT N0. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman Or Crank
x Dan Griset, Chairman pro tem — ma Dan Young
Ronald B. Hoesterey -7—Ursula Kennedy
a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: x William D. Mahoney, Chairman Beth Graham
_Ron Isles, Chairman pro in a Carrey Nelson
Roland E. Bigonger =Henry W. Medea
a A.B. -Buck' Catlin _Chris Norby
7—Dan Griset _Dan Young
x James Neal George Scott
x Arthur 0. Newton _
_ _Carol Downey
x Bob Perry Norman Culver
- x Iry Pickier —_Fred Hunter
a Wayne Silzel _James T. Fasbender
a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chal man Orbrey Duke
a Carrey Nelson, Chairman pro tem _Wayne Wedin
a Edward L. Allen _Paul Verellen
a Wes Bannister _Peter Green
a A.B. -Buck" Catlin _Chris Norby
=Norman Culver _Bob Perry
7—Don R. Griffin Donna L. Chessen
=Dan Griset _Dan Young
7—John Kanel a _
am
a William 0. Mahoney _Beth Grah James Neat _George Scott
a Iry Pickier _Fred Hunter
a J.R. -Bob- Siefen —Don
Wiles
a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
z Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrmn
x Edna Wilson _Victor Grgas
DISTRICT NO. 5: . John C. Cox, Jr., Chai roan x Evelyn Hart
a Donald A. Strauss, Chairman pro tem —RogerEvelyn Hart
a Don R. Roth _ Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman _James M. Ferryman
x Ruthelyn PI unmer, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart
_
a Don R. Rath _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman _Fred Barrera
=Richard Edgar, Chairman pro in _Ursula Kennedy
7—Dan Griset - Dan Young
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
x Sally Anne Sheridan _Larry Agran
a Donald A. Strauss John C. Cox, Jr.
—a—James Wahner _Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: a Tom Mays, Chairman _Jim Silva
a Grace Winchell, Chai man pro tem Wes Bannister
a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Medea; Chairman _Roland E. Bigonger
a Iry Pickier, Chairman pro tem Fred Hunter
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
=Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
=Wayne Wedin _Ron Isles
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller
=Ursula Kennedy, Chairman pro tem Richard B. Edgar
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
a Sally Anne Sheridan _Larry Agran
a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
-2-
07/12/89
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, William N.
Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed,
Penny Kyle, Corinne Clawson, Jim Harris ,�
Hodges, John Linder, Chris Ludlow, Bob
Ooten, Jack Vincent, Chuck Winsor, Ray
Young
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark
Ide, Jamel Demir, Bill Fleming, Conrad
Hohener, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Phil
Stone, Sarwan Wason, Bob Swan, Robert 0.
Liebermann, Allen F. Gray, Everett W.
Maguire, Stuart M. Gross, Armand DeWeese,
Norm Olsson, Thomas Hendrey, Robert
Schneider, Jeff Jeliick, Art Santana,
Mark S. Ludlow, Tom Mossinger, Barbi
Oswald, Dewey Wiles, Don Willet, Curt
Spencer, Mary Lee
x x x x x x x x x x x x x
DISTRICT 5 This 12th day of July, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. ,
Adjournment of meeting due to lack being the time and place for the Regular
or quorum Meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange
County, California, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 5, the
meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the items of business for District
No. 5 continued from the July 12, 1989 agenda, and to consider the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan.
DISTRICT 11 This 12th day of July, 1989, at 7:30 p.m.,
Adjournment of meeting due to lack being the time and place for the Regular
of quorum Meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange
County, California, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 11, the
meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary to 7:30 p.m.,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the items of business for Distsrict
No. 11 continued from the July 12, 1989 agenda, and to consider the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan.
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 6 7 13 8 14 The following persons requested that
eco n t on o ersons w o wis to they be recognized at the appropriate
e neara on specific agenda items time for the agenda items indicated:
Mr. Everett Maguire, of the law firm of Maguire, Toghia & Orbach, representing
Putzmeister, Inc. , in connection with their protest relative to award of Job
No. P1-34-2, Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, to Advanco
Constructors.
Mr. Art Santana, of the law firm of Monteleone & McCrory, representing Advanco
Constructors, in connection with Putzmeister's protest relative to award of Job
No. P1-34-2 to Advanco Constructors.
-3-
07/12/89
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 The Joint Chairman noted that the Joint
Report of the Joint Chairman Boards would be adjourning to Wednesday,
July 19th, at 7:30 p.m. , at the Fountain
Valley Community Center, to consider the Final Environmental Impact Report on the
Districts' Action Plan. He urged Directors to attend this important meeting as
they would also be making a decision on the level of treatment to include in the
application to the Environmental Protection Agency and the Regional Water Quality
Control Board for renewal of the Districts' ocean discharge permit.
Joint Chairman Smith, along with former Joint Chairman, Norm Culver, then
presented a pin to the General Manager, Wayne Sylvester, recognizing him for
30 years of service with the Districts.
The Joint Chairman advised that he was cancelling the Executive Committee meeting
which had been tentatively scheduled for July 20th.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 The General Counsel advised that later
Report of the General Counsel in the meeting he would be reporting on
a matter involving a protest by
Putzmeister, Inc. , relative to award of Job No. P1-34-2, Sludge Handling
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, to Advanco Constructors.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14 The General Counsel briefly reviewed the
Annual Election of Joint Chai mean procedure for election of the Joint
Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman, noting
that each District would caucus and submit a single vote for the candidate of its
choice.
This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards of Directors for the election
of the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary stated
that Ronald B. Hoesterey had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint
Boards on June 14, 1989, in accordance with established procedures.
There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the
unanimous ballot for Director Ronald B. Hoesterey as Joint Chairman of the Joint
Administrative Organization.
DISTRICTS 1 2, 3 ce 6 7 Jo13 &nt 14 This being the annual meeting fixed by
Annual Elec ion of ii the Boards of Directors for the election
Chairman of the Vice Chairman of the Joint
Administrative Organization, the Joint
Chairman then called for nominations for the post, whereupon Chairmen
A. B. "Buck" Catlin and Richard T. Polis were nominated.
The vote was then polled by written ballot and canvassed by a committee which
included Director Dan E. Smith and theGeneral Counsel . Following the canvass,
Director Smith announced that Director A. B. "Buck" Catlin had been elected to
the post of Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization.
Vice Joint Chairman Catlin then thanked the Directors for electing him to the
post.
-4-
07/12/89
DISTRICT 2 The Vice Joint Chairman announced that the
Election of Chairman and ha anon office of Chairman of County Sanitation
pro tem District No. 2 had been vacated by the
election of Director A. B. "Buck" Catlin
to the post of Vice Joint Chairman and that election of a new Chairman would,
therefore, be in order.
Director William D. Mahoney was then duly nominated and elected Chairman of
District No. 2.
Vice Joint Chairman Catlin then reported that the election of Director Mahoney as
Chairman of District No. 2 created a vacancy in the post of Chairman pro tem and
declared nominations in order to fill the vacant position.
Director Ron Isles was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of
District No. 2. -
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held June 14, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held June 14, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held June 14, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held June 14, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held June 14, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting -
held June 14, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held June 14, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-5-
07/12/89
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual
' District claims set forth on pages "A" and
�••✓ "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be,
and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
6/07/89 6/21/89
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 602,029.90 $1,047,099.77
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 3,214,330.61 842,081.28
Joint Working Capital Fund - 126,669.14 175,031.33
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 626.79 11,161.01
DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 73.66
DISTRICT N0.2 - 627,017.33 35,965.21
DIDI TRIG - 376,786.96 259437.11
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 3,421.78 2,870.24
DISTRICT - 7,770.24 6,181.82
DI TRICT NO. 13 - 480.00 -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 7,325.55 908.53
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 700,101.86 8,291.25
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 4,960.82 -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 3,123.81 240.00
5,674,644.79 2,155,341.21
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing and directing execution
and filing .of documents necessary That the following resolutions
for Federal and State Grants for authorizing and directing execution and
the 1988-89 Joint Works Improve- filing of documents necessary for
ments and Additions Federal and State Clean Water Grants and
Loans under 33 U.S.C. , 1251 et seq. ;
Chapters 12.5, 13, 14 and 15; and Division 7 of the California Water Code, and
providing certain assurances in connection with the 1989-90 Joint Works
Improvements and Additions, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards
of Directors:
District No. - Resolution No.
1 89-67-1
2 89-68-2
3 89-69-3
6 89-71-6
7 89-72-7
13 89-74-13
14 89-75-14
Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
-6-
07/12/89
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 6 7 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Blueprinting, P o ocopying
and Related Services, Specification That the bid tabulation and
No. 5-044, to Continental Graphics recommendation re award of contract for
Blueprinting, Photocopying and Related
Services, Specification No. S-044, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Continental
Graphics for a gross annual amount not to exceed $75,189.00, for a one-year
period beginning July 16, 1989, with option for four one-year extensions.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 9 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 9 to the plans and
Job No. J-7-4 specifications for Administration
Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4,
authorizing an addition of $93,125.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts
Corporation for 13 items of additional work including interior finish changes,
wall modification and shear reinforcement, additional roof support under
ventilation system air handling units, construction of separate mailroom,
waterproofing stair No. 3 landing, soffit and wall addition, Boardroom exterior
planter modification, wheelchair lift enclosure, countertop modifications and
finish work, North Perimeter Road cleanup, heating and ventilating compressor
installation, steel door frame modification, and addition of fire-rated ceiling in
Plan Storage Roam; and granting a time extension of 34 calendar days for said
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 17 to
the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 17 to the plans
Job No. J-15 and specifications for Ocean Outfall
Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15, authorizing an addition of $317,661.00 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. for four items of additional work including additional asphalt
paving and gravel for access and parking, installation of base cove on walls in
utility room and elevator machinery roam, modification of a pump platform due to
Interference with ventilation duct, purchase of a 96-inch butterfly valve,
modification of a pipe elbow, reduction of the retained contractor' s funds, and
payment of contract-specified bonuses for early completion of certain major
elements of the project, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 4 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and
Job No. J-15A - specifications for Prepurchase and
Installation of Variable Frequency Drive
Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Boaster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15A, authorizing an addition of $41,052.00 to the contract with General
Electric Company for additional services to set, test and calibrate 20 sets of
existing electrical relays, modification of wiring in switchgear to adjust phasing
and to calibrate 10 transducers, and installation of six additional ground fault
protection relays, be, and is hereby, approved.
`ash
-7-
07/12/89
DISTRICTS 1 A
2 3 6 7 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rov n Chan a Order No. 2 0 the
tans and sRecITIcation3 for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
Job No. J-ZU specifications for Warehouse and
Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and
Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an addition of $50,065.00 to
the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for overexcavation and recompaction of
soil under Buildings 3 and 4, revisions to structural steel shop drawings,
regrading of building pads for Buildings 3, 4, 5 and 6 and rerouting of City of
Fountain Valley water line to avoid an undisclosed concrete encasement; and
granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of said additional
work, be, and is hereby, approved.
= DISTRICTS 1 2 3 6 7 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approvingan a Order No. 1 E.
the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 19 to the plans
Job Nos. PI-29 and P1-31 and specifications for Headworks No. 2
at Plant No. 1, Job NO. P1-20; and
Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts;
and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of
$34,839.53 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for seven items of additional
work including the addition of landscaping and irrigation piping, installation of
two light fixtures in the North Road median, cleanup work due to accidental
flooding of contractor's supplies and tools storage area and reimbursement for
damage to contractor's equipment stored in said area due to failure of Districts'
equipment, repair of groundwater leak at intersection of existing channel ,
construction of concrete retaining wall at Headworks No. 1, grading of area south
of Construction Management office trailers for future storage, and 'additional work
due to undisclosed obstructions and utilities at Digesters 5 and 6, be, and is
hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1, 2. 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin Chan a Order No. 15 to
the tans and sec fications for That Change Order No. 15 to the plans
Job Nos. P1-25 P1-2 P - 1 and specifications for Covers for
P2-33 and P - 4 Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant Na. 2, Job
No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and
Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A",
Job No. P2-34, authorizing an addition of $96,870.53 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. for four items of additional work including substitution of
diaphragm valves for ball valves in the chlorine piping system; modifications to
the structural aluminum foul air plenum supports at the scrubber complexes to
avoid interference with ductwork connections; removal of undisclosed fill concrete
discovered during demolition work at Headworks "C"; and extension of Primary
Sedimentation Basin "P" by-pass piping, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin Chan a Order No. 16 to
the plans an speclficat ons for That Change Order No. 16 to the plans
Job NOS. P1-25 Pi-Lb -31 and specifications for Covers for
P2-33 and P - Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and
-8-
07/12/89
Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A",
Job No. P2-34, authorizing an addition of $97,868.43 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. for seven items of additional work including repairs to
polyurethane coating of Primary Sedimentation Basins "P" and "Q"; the purchase and
installation of 48 access hatches for sampling, maintenance and repair work;
increasing foul air damper shaft size; removal and relocation of Pflanz Headwork
roof drain piping; installation of temporary stop logs and guides for the efflu
launders to control leakage; modification of walkways, berms and railings at
Primary Sedimentation Basins "D", "E", "F" and "G" to comply with current OSHA
regulations; and relocation of undisclosed air line at Headworks "C", be, and is
hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 3 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
Job No. P1-27 specifications for Entrances, Site,
Security and Interior Road Improvements
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, authorizing a net addition of $20,65Z.88 to the
contract with Klewit Pacific Co. for additional work to reroute the traffic
counter circuit conflicting with asphalt paving grades at the Intersection of
Ellis Avenue and the new entrance, modification of gate control system,
modification of curb at new main entrance, modifications to Wastehauler Building;
City of Fountain Valley water piping modifications; modification of the type of
directional signs along the roadways, and piping modifications for the restroom
addition to the guard shack; and granting a time extension of 24 calendar days to
provide for delivery of the new directional signs specified, be, and is hereby,
approved.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 the
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the
Professiona Services Agreement That the Selection Committee
with Lee and Ro Consulting certification of the final negotiated
Engineers for design and fee relative to Addendum No. 2 to the
construction services required for Professional Services Agreement with Lee
Job No. PI-33 and Ro Consulting Engineers for design
and construction services required for
Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related .Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-33, providing for additional design services for relocation of effluent
junction box and polymer facility, realignment of Fuentes Road, and modifications
to the equipment and scum trough hatches on the primary clarifiers, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-76,
approving Addendum No. 2 to said Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers
for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct
expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $89,500.00, increasing
the total authorized compensation from $975,000.00 to an amount not to exceed
$1,064,500.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans d specifications far That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
Job No.an P1-35-1 specifications for Rehabilitation of
Digesters 7 and 8 at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1, authorizing a net deduction of $248,380.00 from the
contract with S. A. Healy Co. due to deletion of the bid item for cleaning
Digesters 7 and 8, and providing for compensation for support services to assistla.
outside contractor performing said work; and granting a time extension of 90
calendar days for delays associated with said project modification, be, and is
hereby, approved.
-9-
07/12/89
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 6, 7 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Fa in Job o. 1-35-1-1 to
ora o Enterprises, Inc. That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 89-77, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Cleaning
of Digesters 7 and 8 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1-1, to Dorado Enterprises,
Inc. in the total amount of $171,000.00. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 6 7 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
rov n Chan a rder o. o the
plans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
Job No. PZ-37 specifications for Miscellaneous
Modifications and Improvements to
Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing an addition of
$56,157.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper for construction of new utility
trench at chlorination station and modifications to chlorine solution piping,
additional excavation due to undisclosed electrical utilities; removal of
interfering wall fittings at Digesters "A" and "B"; and for additional dome liner
vents, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1 2, 3 6 7 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving hangs Order o. 2 to the
Tans and specifications for That Change Order-No. 2 to the plans and
S ecification No. R- -1 an specifications for Underground Tank
pec f cat on NO. K-UZ/-Z Replacement at Plant No. 1,
Specification No. R-027-1, and
Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-027-2,
authorizing a net addition of $6,320.00 to the contract with Hekimian &
Associates, Inc. for nine items of miscellaneous modifications, deletions and
additional work required including,assessment of liquidated damages at the rate of
$150/day for 60 days due to late completion of the project; and granting a time
extension of 12 calendar days for completion of the additional work, be, and is
hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 3 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
S ecification No. R-027-1 and specifications for Underground Tank
Specifica ion 0. R-027-2 Replacement at Plant No. 1,
Specification No. R-027-1, and
' Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-027-2,
authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for removal and disposal of
contaminated soil , for a total addition of $60,921.12 to the contract with
Hekimian & Associates, Inc. , be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1 2, 3 6 7 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Specifica ion No. R-027-1
and Specification NO. R-027-2 That the Boards of Directors hereby
as complete adopt Resolution No. 89-78, accepting
Underground Tank Replacement at Plant
No. 1, Specification No. R-027-1, and Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. 2,
Specification No. R-027-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-10-
07/12/89
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to ne otiate a Professional That the Selection Committee be, and is
Services greement with John hereby, authorized to negotiate a
Carollo Engineers re design and Professional Services Agreement with
construction services required for Jahn Carollo Engineers for design and
Job Nos. PS-36 and P2-42 construction services required for
Secondary Treatment Improvements at
Plant 1, Job No. P1-36; and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant 2, Job
No. P2-42.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
utho Arizing staff to issue a
purchase order to South Coast Air That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
Quality Management District for to issue a purchase order to South Coast
payment of various fees required Air Quality Management District in an
for calendar years 1988 and 1989 amount not to exceed $300,000.00 for
payment of various fees required by
SCAQMD regulations during calendar years 1988 (adopted retroactively) and 1989,
payable during fiscal year 1989-90, estimated as follows:
Type of Fee Amount
Annual Emissions 1988 $61,000
Annual Emissions 1989 73,000
(Fees increased 20%)
Annual Operating Permit 66,000
Permit Evaluation 50,000
Miscellaneous Fees 50,000
TOTAL $300,000
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14
Rejecting protest of Putzmeister,
Inc. and awarding contract for
Job No. P1-34-2 to Advanco
Contructors, Division of Zurn
Constructors, Inc.
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
plans and specifications for
Job No. P1-34-2 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for Sludge Handling
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, making miscellaneous
modifications and clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Receive and file Staff Report and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Recommendation re Award of Job
No. P1-34-2 That the Staff Report and
Recommendation re Award of Sludge
Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, dated
July 3, 1989, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
-11-
07/12/89
Receive and file "Letter of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Protest" submitted by attorneys for
Putzmeister, Inc. That the "Letter of Protest" dated
June 14, 1989, submitted by Maguire,
Toghia & Orbach on behalf of Putzmeister, Inc. , objecting to award of Job
No. P1-34-2 to Advanco Constructors due to the omission of the name of
manufacturer of the cake transfer and loading pumps in their bid and
questioning the legality of wording in the specifications, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file letter from Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Advanco Constructors, Inc.
_ That the letter from Advanco
Constructors, Inc. dated May 23, 1989 naming the manufacturer of the cake
transfer and loading pumps omitted from their bid, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed.
Receive and file letter from Moved, seconded and duly carried:
C emwest, Inc. representing 5chwlng
America That the letter from Chemwest, Inc. ,
representing Schwing America, dated
May 24, 1989 confirming Advanco's intent to utilize Schwing America cake
transfer and loading pumps, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file letter from Moved, seconded and duly carried:
attorneys for Advanco Constructors
That the letter from Monteleone &
McCrory, attorneys representing Advanco Constructors, dated June 21, 1989
responding to "Letter of Protest" filed on behalf of Putzmeister, Inc. , be,
and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file letter from John Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Carollo Engineers
That the letter from John Carollo
Engineers, Districts' Engineer, dated June 28, 1989 re evaluation and design
criteria for sludge cake pumping systems, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed.
Receive and file General Counsel ' s Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Memorandum
That the General Counsel 's
Memorandum dated June 26, 1989 responding to the "Letter of Protest",
concluding that said protest filed by Putzmeister, Inc. is not meritorius
and stating that the Boards have the authority to award to the low bidder,
be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Report of staff and General Counsel The Director of Engineering gave a
brief overview of the project for
construction of Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-34-2. This is the first of three major projects that will increase
treatment. capacity at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Bids were publicly opened on
May 23, 1989. The Districts received six bids ranging from $19,085,600 to
$23,691,524. On June 14th a "Letter of Protest" was received from
Putzmeister, Inc. , one of the two manufacturers specified in the plans and
\� specifications as being acceptable suppliers of the cake transfer and
loading pumps required in this project.
-12-
07/12/89
The Districts' General Counsel reviewed the written staff report previously
mailed to Directors along with copies of correspondence and memoranda in
connection with the protest of Putzmeister. Putzmeister appealed based on -
claim that the low bidder, Advanco Constructors, failed to list the name o1�
the manufacturer of the cake transfer and loading pumps which they planned
to use; and, because, in Putzmeister's opinion, the bid documents prepared
by the Districts violated Public Contract Code Section 3400, which relates
to requirements for naming subcontractors on public bids. Putzmeister also
contended that the Schwing pumps (the other acceptable manufacturer named in
the specifications) were not comparable to the Putzmeister pumps.
The General Counsel noted that it was true that Advanco failed to name a
supplier on the bid documents, but that is not a substantial omission and _
may be waived by the Board. It is a matter of record that one minute after
the time bids were to be opened, but before they were actually opened,
Advanco had obliged itself to buy Schwing pumps and so informed the
Districts. Accordingly, there was no opportunity for Advanco to bid shop as
Putzmeister had alleged in their protest letter. He further pointed out
that omitting the name of a supplier was not the same as failing to name a
subcontractor. There is no provision in the Contract Code relating to
supplying of equipment, parts or materials which requires bidders to name
the supplier. The Districts' bid documents requested this information for
convenience and clarity of the bid. He reiterated that failing to name the
manufacturer of the cake transfer and loading pumps was a minor irregularity
in the bid and that the Directors have the authority to waive any
Irregularities.
The General Counsel advised that the Districts' design engineer would later
address Putzmeister's allegation that the two pumps are not equal , and would
also comment on the timeliness of the protest. He noted that there is no
legal requirement that a part that is specified be absolutely equal with
another manufacturer' s part. The Districts realize the benefit of a strong
competitive market and tried to provide for that in the specifications. The
bidders had two manufacturers to choose from--Putzmeister and Schwing. They
all chose Schwing.
The Chair then recognized Mr. Everett Maguire of Maguire, Toghia 8 Orbach,
representing Putzmeister, Inc. He contended that the bid documents prepared
by the Districts were not competitive and the two cake transfer and loading
pumps specified were not equal . In his opinion, the specifications should
have contained the words "or equal ".
Mr. Maguire also contended that failure of the low bidder to list the
supplier of the cake transfer and loading pumps that they planned to use -
rendered their bid illegal . He added that he represented three taxpayers
who objected to the award of this project to Advanco, and advised they they
could legally file a lawsuit in connection with award of this contract.
Directors questioned why Putzmeister waited so long to file their protest
relative to the specifications. Mr. Maguire indicated that he was not
retained until after the bids were opened, and that he did write a letter as
soon as he was informed of the situation.
-13-
07/12/89
The General Counsel pointed out that there are many exceptions to Public
Contract Code Section 3400. One of which is when a city or district has a
\ unique situation, such as the Districts' operating requirements. The Cade
provides that in these instances, the agency doesn't even have to proceed in
. accordance with the other requirements of Section 3400. After many months
of study by the design engineer and staff, it was determined that it was
absolutely critical for the manufacturer to have equipment service and
maintenance facilities located in the United States. The Boards approved
the plans and specifications several months ago. Any challenge regarding
the specifications should have been made at that time.
Directors indicated concurrence with the General Counsel 's opinion that
_ because this equipment is essential to the operation of the treatment plant
and in order to protect public health and safety, the Districts should be
able to specify the type of equipment or service capability required.
The Chair then recognized Mr. Art Santana of Monteleone & McCrory,
representing Advanco Constructors. He confirmed that his client had failed
to insert the name of the manufacturer of the cake transfer and loading
pumps in their bid. However, within one minute of the closing of the time
for receipt of bids, they confirmed to the Districts that they would be
using Schwing cake transfer and loading pumps. He also commented on the
untimeliness of the protest and questioned why Putzmeister waited until
June 14th to object to the specifications.
Mr. Santana stated that he concurred with the points previously made by the
Districts' General Counsel , staff and the Directors.
The Chairman then introduced Mr. William Knopf, representing John Carollo
Engineers, the design engineer for this project. Mr. Knopf addressed the
allegation that the plans and specifications were illegal because they only
specified two manufacturers of cake transfer and loading pumps and did not
use the wards "or equal ". He explained the procedure his firm used to
evaluate the equipment specified. In order to provide for a competitive
market, the Districts try to specify parts, supplies or materials that could
be provided by more than one manufacturer.
Mr. Knopf noted that their studies indicated that the sludge cake
transfer/pumping method was the recommended method of moving sludge. Two
basic criteria were used to evaluate the manufacturers. It was determined
to be critical that whoever supplied the cake transfer and loading pumps
must be located in North America and they must have the capability of
providing parts and service in the United States because of the limited
capacity of sludge storage tanks which would necessitate that any repair
work be completed within four days.
The Engineer noted that their firm had over 20 written contacts and many
more informal contacts with Putzmeister during preparation of the
specifications. Draft specifications were provided to Putzmeister and
Schwing for their review. He added that a comparison of the two pumps only
showed a 10% difference between .them. Both can deliver the same capacity.
He also indicated that they had done a telephone survey of over 40 different
users of the various pumps in North America and Europe in order to verify
experience worldwide.
Mr. Knopf responded to Directors' questions regarding actual viewing of
installations using Schwing and Putzmeister pumps.
-14-
07/12/89
ReJecting protest of Putuneister, _ Following a discussion in which
Inc. an awardin contract to Directors indicated they felt that
Advanco onstructors Division of the public interest would be served
Turn onstructors, Inc. by waiving the irregularity in the
bid submitted by Advanco
Constructors and awarding the contract to the low bidder, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That the protest of Putzmeister, Inc., dated June 14, 1989, re award of
Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, to
Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , be, and is
hereby, rejected; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 89-79, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, and
awarding contract for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-34-2, to Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors,
Inc. in the total amount of $19,085,600.00. A certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3 6, 7 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Rece ve, file and approve staff
Summary Financial Report for nine- That the staff Summary Financial Report
month period ending March 31, 1989 for the nine-month period ending
March 31, 1989, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
.Receive file and a rove written
report of the Fiscal Policy That the written report of the Fiscal
Committee Policy Committee dated June 29, 1989 re
1989-90 Excess Workers' Compensation
insurance policy renewal , be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved.
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 6 7, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratif in act on of Fiscal Polic _
omoittee n placing statutory That the action of the Fiscal Policy
Excess Workers' compensation Committee in placing statutory. Excess
insurance coverage effective Workers' Compensation insurance -
July 1, 1989 coverage, with $250,000 self-insured
retention, effective July 1, 1989, for
an annual premium not to exceed $32,113.00, be, and is hereby, ratified.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive
Committee's meeting on June 28, 1989,
be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
-15-
07/12/89
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Creating a Capital Facilities Fund
and terminating the Accumulated That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Capital Outlay Fund and the the following resolutions, creating a
Facilities Revolving Fund Capital Facilities Fund and terminating
the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund and
the Facilities Revolving Fund in each District:
DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO.
1 89-81-1
2 89-82-2
3 89-83-3
6 89-85-6
7 89-86-7
13 89-88-13
14 89-89-14 (Capital Fund title
change only)
Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District's 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 9,123,000
Capital Facilities Fund 15,177,000
Construction Fund 7,082,000
Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1951 70,875
TOTAL $ 31,452,875
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District's 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 24,828,000
Capital Facilities Fund 59,579,000
Construction Fund - 17,268,000
TOTAL $101,675,000
-16-
07/12/89
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District' s 1989-90 fiscal v
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 24,746,000
Capital Facilities Fund 54,620,000
Construction Fund 18,746,000
Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 227,000
TOTAL $ 98,339,000
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 19 9-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District' s 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 5,552,000
Capital Facilities Fund 8,826,000
TOTAL $ 14,378,000
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District's 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 11,262,000
Capital Facilities Fund 25,083,000
Bond & Interest Fund - 1962 507,112
Bond & Interest Fund - 1970 473,000
TOTAL $ 37,325,112
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District' s 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 743,000
Capital Facilities Fund 9,947,000
TOTAL $ 10,690,000
-17-
07/12/89
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and unanimously
A roving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
u get
That the District's 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 847,000
Capital Facilities Fund 12,963,000
TOTAL $ 13,810,000
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 6 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Esta li Shing the annual ann
appropriations limit for fiscal That the following resolutions establishing
year 1989-90 the annual Gann appropriations limit for
fiscal year 1989-90 for each District in
accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California
Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of
Directors:
DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION
1 89-90-1 $ 2,192,000
2 89-91-2 8,153,000
3 89-92-3 10,763,000
6 89-94-6 1,287,000
7 89-95-7 3,050,000
Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve Staff
Report re revised Wastewater That the Staff Report, dated June 28,
Discharge Regulations for the 1989 (Revised) , summarizing revisions to
County Sanitation Districts of the Districts' wastewater discharge
Orange County regulations, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICT 1
Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. 113
First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance No. 113
That proposed Ordinance No. 113, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitdtion District No. 1 of
Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 104 and
110, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
-18-
07/12/89
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 113 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 113, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities,
and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 104 and 110, be introduced and passed to second
reading and public hearing on August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the
District's administrative office.
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance No. 113 is categorically
exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby
finds that adoption of Ordinance
No. 113 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15308, in that the Ordinance is a regulatory -
action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment.
DISTRICT 2
Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. 208
First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance No. 208
That proposed Ordinance No. 208, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of
Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 205 and
207, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 208 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 208, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities,
and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 205 and 207, be introduced and passed to second -
reading and public hearing on August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the
District' s administrative office.
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance No. 208 1s categorically
exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby
finds that adoption of Ordinance
No. 208 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15308, in that the Ordinance is a regulatory
action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment.
-19-
07/12/89
DISTRICT 3
Actions re prOposetl Ordinance
\ No. 311
First readin of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance
No. 11
That proposed Ordinance No. 311, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of
Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 306 and
310, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 311 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 311, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities,
and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 306 and 310, be introduced and passed to second
reading and public hearing on August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the
District's administrative office.
Makin findin that ado tion of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance Na. it is categorically
exempt Der CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby
finds that adoption of Ordinance
No. 311 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15308, in that the Ordinance is a regulatory
action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment.
DISTRICT 6
Actions re proposed Ordinance
Ntl. 6 44
First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance No. 14 -
That proposed Ordinance No. 614, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of
Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 606, 608
and 610, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 614 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 614, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities,
and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 606, 608 and 610, be introduced and passed to
second reading and public hearing on August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the
District's administrative office.
-20-
07/12/89
Makin findin that ado talon of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ora
r nance No: 14 s ca a or ca 1
exempt per E A uidelines That the Board of Directors hereby
finds that adoption of Ordinance
No. 614 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15308, in that the Ordinance is a regulatory
action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment.
DISTRICT 7
Actions re proposed Ordinance
o. 722 --
First readin of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: ;
Ordinance No. 72
That proposed Ordinance No. 722, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 718 and
721, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 722 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 722, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities,
and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 718 and 721, be introduced and passed to second
reading and public hearing on August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., at the
District's administrative office.
Makin findin that ado talon of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance No. 72 i$ cote oricall
exempt per CEQA Guiaelines That the Board of Directors hereby
finds that adoption of Ordinance
No. 722 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15308, in that the Ordinance is a regulatory
action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment.
DISTRICT 13
Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. INS
First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
r nance No. 1305
That proposed Ordinance No. 1305, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of
Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1301 and
1304, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
-21-
07/12/89
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1305 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 1305, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities,
and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1301 and 1304, be introduced and passed to
second reading and public hearing on August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., at the
District's administrative office.
Makin findin that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
r nonce o. 5 s categorically
exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby
finds that adoption of Ordinance
No. 1305 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15308. in that the Ordinance is a regulatory
action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment.
DISTRICT 14
Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. 1402
First readin of Pro osed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance No. 14
That proposed Ordinance No. 1402, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of
Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1401, be
read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1402 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 1402, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities,
and Repealing Ordinance No. 1401, be introduced and passed to second reading
and public hearing on August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's
administrative office.
Makin findin that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance Na. 14 is categoricaiiy
exempt per CEQA. uidelines That the Board of Directors hereby
finds that adoption of Ordinance
No. 1402 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15308, in that the Ordinance is a regulatory
action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment.
-22-
07/12/89
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 6 7 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Rece ve, file and approve proposal
from Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for That the proposal from Malcolm Pirnie,
professional services to assist Inc. dated June 14, 1989 for
staff with re aration of volatile professional services to assist the
organic compounds VOC reduction staff with preparation of the
demonstration project re 60 mgd volatile organic compounds (VOC)
primary treatment expansion at reduction demonstration project in order
Reclamation Plant No. 1 to determine the best available control
technology (BACT) , required by SCAQMD, 1n
connection with the Districts' Permit to Construct the project for 60 mgd primary
treatment expansion at Reclamation Plant No. 1, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase
order for said professional services in an amount not to exceed $140,000.00. -
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve proposal
from Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for That the proposal from Malcolm Pirnie,
professional services to prepare Inc. dated June 22, 1989 for
Phase I inventory and assessment of professional services to prepare the
total air toxic emissions released Phase I inventory and assessment of the
Into the air by treatment facili- total air toxic emissions released into
ties at Plants 1 and 2; and the air by treatment facilities at
authorizing staff to issue Change Plants 1 and 2 and submit to the South
Order No. 1 to Purchase Order Coast Air Quality Management District
No. 40063 for said work for review and approval , and for
technical support services in connection
with said Phase I work, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order
No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 40063, previously issued to Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. , to
commence said work in order to meet the State's August 1st filing time
requirement, increasing the total amount from $25,000.00 to an amount not to
exceed $100,000.00 for completion of the Phase I work required to comply with
AB 2588 (Air Taxics Hot Spots Act).
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Staff Report re _
Agreement with County Assessor re That the Staff Report re Agreement with
Supplemental User Fee Processing County Assessor re Supplemental User Fee
Processing, dated June 29, 1989, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to
execute an agreement with the That the General Manager be, and is
Orange County Assessor' s Office for hereby, authorized to execute an
the purchase lease of property file agreement with the Orange County
data base services required to Assessor' s Office for the purchase/lease
collect supplemental user fees on of property file data base services
the property tax bills necessary to calculate, assess and
collect the Districts' supplemental user
fee charges on the annual property tax bills, the annual cost for said services
to be in the amount fixed by the County Assessor and Board of Supervisors.
-23-
07/12/89
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at8:55 p.m., July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file rest
for
annexation an authorizin That the petition from Herbert Brohn, at
initiation of proceedings re al. requesting annexation of 4.76 acres
proposed Annexation No. 69 - Brohn of territory to the District in the
Annexation vicinity of Timkin Lane and Coyote Lane
In the City of Anaheim, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 89-97-2,
authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District,
proposed Annexation No. 69 - Brohn Annexation to County Sanitation District
No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hail B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 6 to the
plans and specifications far That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and
Contract No. 3-26R-1 specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk
Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at
Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1, authorizing an addition of $19,627.00 to
the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company for sandblasting and
application of coal tar epoxy coating to 47 manhole rings and covers, be, and is
hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried;
Receive file and deny claims of
Magda lien Rueda and leresa Rueda That the claims of Magdalen Rueda dated
re Contract No. 3-28R-1 March 13, 1989, and Teresa Rueda dated
March 15, 1989, for alleged personal
Injuries and property damage in undetermined amounts, due to a traffic accident in
connection with construction of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault)
Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1, be, and are hereby
received, ordered filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claims be, and are hereby, referred to the District's
General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's
�.-►� insurance company for appropriate action.
-P4-
07/12/89
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 12, 1989.
DISTRICTS 6, 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addenda Nos. 1 and to
the plans and specifications for That Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans
Contract No. 14-1-1B and specifications for Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Bristol Street to
Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) ,
making miscellaneous technical modifications, transmitting detailed specifications
to include City of Costa Mesa street improvements, providing additional detailed
specifications including work restrictions during the holiday season, clarifying
bonus payment provisions and transmitting revised proposal pages, be, and are
hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 6, 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Contract No. 14-1-iB to
Steve Bubalo Construction Co. That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 89-98, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract
No. 14-1-1B (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) , to Steve Bubalo
Construction Co. in the total amount of $5,345,523.30 (City of Costa Mesa to
reimburse Districts for their portion of the project) . A certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m. , July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with Church Engineering, That the Selection Committee
Inc. re Contract No. 7-13 certification of the final negotiated
fee relative to the Professional
Services Agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for design and construction
services required for Campus Relief Sewer, from Von Karman Avenue to Jamboree
Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved; and,
-25-
07/12/89
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 89-99-7, approving said agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for said
services on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed
$43,480.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving agreement with County of
Orange re adjustment of manhole That the Board of Directors hereby
covers and clean-outs on District adopts Resolution No. 89-100-7,
sewers in conjunction with County's approving agreement with County of
1988-89 street resurfacing program Orange, providing for the adjustment of
manhole covers and clean-outs on
District sewers in conjunction with the County' s 1988-89 street resurfacing
program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That payment of the actual cost of the manhole adjustment plus
10% for inspection and administrative costs for approximately 279 manholes, at
a per-manhole unit cost not to exceed $220 nor be less than $155 per manhole;
and for clean-outs, at a per-clean-out unit cost not to exceed $176 nor be less
than $125 per clean-out, be, and is hereby, authorized.
A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m. , July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m. , July 12, 1969.
Secretary of t e Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
\� Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-26-
( J NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAP77AL PROCESSING DATE 5/31189 PAGE
L REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06 07 B9 005 ING DATE 66/07/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
099980 ABC PAINT STRIPING SERVICE $675.00 ASPHALT STRIPING
s 099909 ADAMSON UNIFORM 9 EQUIP. $582.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES
099998 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. $1.250.764.11 CON YR PI-26,P2-J2,33.34
:a 099991 AIR PRODUCTS 3 CHEMICAL INC. $23,069.60 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
099992 AIRGUARD INDUSTRIES. INC. $109.33 ELECTRIC PARTS
_ ALLEN ONC TRUCKS $14,085.28 NEW VEHICLE
099994 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. S1.181.55 MECHANICAL PARTS
i. 099999 ANIRTER - WINE A CABLE $124.24 INSTRUMENT PART
oANTELOPE VALLEY EQUIP. S1. .08 TRBCE P
I1r 099997 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.072.78 NOTICES 6 ADS
099998 ARATEY SERVICES. INC. S121.90 UNIFORM RENTALS
MM'I 97999 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD., INC $85.86 BUILDING MATERIALS
I;N 100000 ASSOC. PUBLIC SAFETY S125.00 INSTRUMENT SERVICE
NNNN 100001 ASSOCIATEO SOILS ENGINEERING "I
1 909.5I SOIL TESTING
,n�D'0L�1'Nf—CY T .141r7R CONVEYOR PARTS
xi 100003 AVIS CAR LEASING S38.762.00 MEN VEHICLES
len 100004 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S46,869.39 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88
Iu 00 ASSOC. $5,7 .00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P145626,P232.33,34.37
FP1 W. 3006 BANTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $3,312.37 LAB SUPPLIES
= lu 100307 BEN2 ENGINEERING, INC. $316.73 COMPRESSOR PARTS
0008 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 3715.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES
,. 100009 SON-A-RUES $86.20 TRUCK PARTS
L7U 10001D BROOKS PRODUCTS $8,130.00 VAULTS
u 1 BROWN S C L Y LL CONSULTING $79,892.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-37,J-23-1
�• 1�+. I0OD12 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. S205.70 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
D pel 100013 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 3440.00 LAND SURVEYING
I�-• 10001E GARY C. STREED $575.52 PETTY CASH REIIEORSE!®IT
300015 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY 9172.78 PAPER
1011016 C 3 R RECONDITIONING CO. 2350.80 MECHANICAL PARTS
100017 CS COMPANY S8r702.51 VALVE
100018 CSI-CALTROL S1,372.08 MECHANICAL PARTS
u 300619 CAL-CHER SALES $148.40 SAFETY SUPPLIES
Ie7 100029 JOHN R. CALAPR10Er PNO $4,590.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - OC&W MORTT08IN0
au,' 100021 CAROLLO-BOYLE.A JOINT VENTURE $29,864.16 ENGINEERING SERVICES US 87-131
100022 CASE POWER 6 EQUIPMENT $593.11 TRUCK PARTS
100023 CENTURY SAFETY INST. S SUPP. $2.329.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES
100024 CHEMWEST INDUSTRIES, INC. S66,30T.03 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-09-88
100025 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $3,143.39 OIL 6 CREASE
100026 CHLORINATORS 6 CONTROLS, INC. $774.16 CHLORINATION PARTS
100027 DALE CHRISTIAN STRUC. ENGR. $1.200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20
100029 CHRISTEVE CORP. S166,086.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-31
,y 00029 CORINNE CLAWSON S32.02 MEETING MUSE
100130 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $4,945.50 MECHANICAL PARTS
100031 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. S174.12 MUCK PARTS
Lu100032 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $6,194.45 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
I� 100033 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $22,583.65 BLUEPRINTING
4-'-'IIII
t+l
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5131189 PAGE 2
LP REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DI TR ICTI OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/07/09 POSTING DATE 06/07/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
100034 CONTROL CABLES. INC. 457.96 CABLE
C935 CONTROL DATA CORPORATION $370.5a FIELD SERVICES
ID0036 CONTROLCO $97.48, ELECTRIC PARTS
100037 CORE-INTERNATIONAL $2.222.00 COMPUTER PARTS
100038 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $69.34 AMMOBILE
100039 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2.097.09 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
100090 CAL WATER $129.50 RENTAL EQUIPNAN7
LARRY C A
I OOO42 STATE OF CALIFORNIA f980.00 SHE PROCESSING FRB
100043 STATE OF CALIFORNIA L159.50 RAAARDDUS NOTE TAX
100044 DATARENTAL 'No
100045 DECO f371.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
1OP096 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. $1.741.04 VALVE PARTS
100047 D F LIPPO ASSOCIATES
10009E DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $25.003.52 PLANT MAINTEANCE 6 REPAIRS
100049 D•VALS SALES CO. $129.79 PITTINGS
100050 E.Y.L. INSTRUMEM 5 INC. . 8 ELECTRONICS
_ I 100051 EAS T MAN. INC. $2.658.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES
•I� 100052 Y. M. EBERT CORP. $783.031,44 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-2
m z. 190853 Y.N. EBERT CORP. $343,435.50
X 100054 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY S600.30 PRESENTATION AIDS
Z • 100055 ENCHANTER. INC. $4.200.00 OCAAN SAMPLING M.0.6-10-87
100056 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $260.00 to SERVICES
[A • 100057 FST SAND AND GRAVEL, INC. $234.83 ROAD RASE MATERTA.S
100058 JAMES FALCONER f2.100.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - SCAQ101
300059 JOHN B. FALKENSTE N P.E. it 5 CON - - -
y_ 100060 FARR SALES A SERVICE $750.79 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
N 100061 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $155.75 AIR PREIONT
100062 FERRELLOAS $29,25 PROPANE
100063 FISCHER L PORTER CO. L $10,022.77 CRLDRINATIOM PARTS
IODO60 FLO-SYSTEMS f608.84 ELECTRIC PARTS
300065 GELBER PUMPS INC, S214.46 PUMP PARTS
100066 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $511.35 PAINT SUPPLIES
10006T FOUNTAIN VALLEY READY MIR f1.61l.65 CONCREIB
10006E DONA ■ A SO S
100069 THE FORBORO CO. 52,219.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
100070 FROST ENGINEERING
SERVICES CO. 132.18 VAVLES
loasTj GANAHL LUMBER CO. $ 5D BUILDING
100072 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION F108.160.38 CONSTRUCTION 1-13A
100073 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. f1.769.54 TELEPHONE
100074 GIERLICH-MI HELL INC. $14,353.96
IO G075 OON 6REEK L ASSOCIATES $13,918.00 ENCINEUING SERVICES RES 98-72
100076 HALP.IN SUPPLY CO. $206.70 OXYGEN SUPPLIES
100077 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $3.310.73 PUMP PARTS
1 007E HATCH L KIRR. IN . $4,735.31 I�CRANICIL PARTS
1B00T9 S. A. HEALY CO. $90.300.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-31-1
11J
-
C ND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/99 PAGE
L REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/DT/B9
A
VARIANT 00. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
100080 DAVID REINS 316.00 MEETING EXPENSE
1I 100081 E.G. ME LL ER•S SON• INC. f91.30 TOOLS
1 CiY�T f18. HARDWARE
�• 100083 HOER BI6ER C.V.S. CALIF. • INC. $1.256.18 ICAL PARTS
lECBANRTS 100081 HORIZON HIGH-REACH $187.66 PA
�ry BATTERIES 3288.69 BATTERIES
�111 10008E P.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. 32.9T8.21 MANDRAKE
•� 109087 IND OELAVAL INC. fS66.81 ELECTRIC CONTROLS
L THREADED PRODUCTS 61:116.71 CPARS 6 CHAIN
100089 INGRAM PAPER 22104.29 pan
J 100090 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $217.76 TRUCK PARTS
00 1 T R Ai 0 AL TIME RECORDER 369.00 SERVICE ACRE@EMT
p 100092 JACK K CHANGE 5211.17 TRUCK REPAIRS
1 00 093 RIVIERA FINANCE 21. 9.90 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
!.•I 0091 J NSEN TOOLS 6 ALLOTS fIrJ9116.20 TOOLS
• W 100095 KAMAN BEARINGS f SUPPLY 1471.30 FITTINGS
100096 KAMER COMPANY $1.670.68TOOLS
100097 Y-RAT* INC, f1.107.27 ELECTRONIC PARTS
100098 THE NE1TM COMPANIES 32r 765.IS ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35636
fTl 100099 KIE WIT PACIFIC CO. $1.10E+001.p5 CONSTRUCTION PLOT
X IOU100 K-SX EARLN6• INC. f2.378.63 MECRAOCIAL PARTS
= w IOC 101 KIRST PUMP 6 MACHINE WORKS KS $1,281.01 PUMP PARTS
100102 MARTIN KORDICK• SR $3.055.80 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-a1.5-2R.5-aA-.
�p 100103 LEE 6 0.0 CO NS ULTIN6 ENBR. $87,031.00 CONSULTING SERVICES PI-33
'I•a.11 100100 LIMITORGUE CORP. f5.397.35 INSTRUMENT
100105 MDS $50.88 INSTRUMENT PATS
ioolofi 327 .5U PEYCOGRAPRIC SERVICES
101
107 MALCOLM PIRNIE • INC. $18,799.41 ENGINEERING SERVICES US 86-166
W i 100108 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $46.71 INSTRUMENT qupPLT..
f OClO9 MATT - CHLOR• INC. $1,296.09 CHLORINATION PARTS
I00110 MCKENNA ENGR. 6 EQUIP. $16.901.13 PEE PARTS
100111 MC KINNEY ELECTRON CS 969.95 GATE PARTS
+�+ OUT — LU-IuXT533CCRT'Ls . 390.00 LAB SERVICES
I00113 MED L I N
CONSOLS CO. 2291.19 GAUGE
30G111 IN ONAS MENDE2 5626.79 I.TAR71M MAIN
0115 MICRO HICROAGE COMPUTER 56+119.16 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 6 HARDWARE
100116 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. f2.8B9.09 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
100117 MLIOEN BUNTICN CONSTRUCTION CO 3350.306.3E CnxsTvncrTnx a_PeR_L
1`y 1 01 8 MONT GON EBY LABORATORIES fi.i20.00 LAB SERVICES
Wd 100119 MOORE B TABER 35.3:3.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES DIST 2
100120 NEAL SUPPLY CO. 3160.31 PTTTTWrs
100121 NEWPORT BUSINESS INTERIORS 31,015.88 PANELING
100122 NORTH SUPPLY 1778.93 INSTRUMENT PART
100123 OCEAN SALT Co.,
O a INC. .353.26 SALT
100124 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. $36,455.75 CHLORINE M.0.10-12-88
100125 ONE DAY PAINT 6 BODY $230.16 TRUCK REPAIR
I+�
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE 4
[� REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _
CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/D7/89
S
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
100126 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY S275.07 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
t 00127 OR NSE COAST JEEP 912 588.20 EW m1mr.
IOD128 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. S102.29 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
100129 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. 973.03 PESTICIDE
0130 ORANGE VALVE S FITTING CO.
100131 COUNTY OF ORANGE 533.754.4E DISPOSAL DATE FEES
IOD132 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2,479.25 PERMIT PEES
100133 RO 0.T L CTTR ON E DEFERRED COMP DEPOSIT VICAR.
13 100134 PACIFIC ELECTRIC. INC. $15,531.49 CONSTRUCTION 3-15
100135 PACIFIC ELECTRIC S58.139.80 CONSTRUCTION J-15
100136 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT C
200137 PACIFIC BELL $42.51 TELEPHDNE
100138 PHOTO A SOUND CO. 98,386.53 ComPUTER EQUIPMENT 6 SUPPLIES
100139 PICK WICK PAPER S238.00 PAPE
0190 PIMA 6R0 SYSTEMS. INC, $44.464.55 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
106141 POLYPURE. INC. $13,937.66 CATIONIC POLYMER H.0.3-8-89
100142 POWER ELECTRD SUPPLY CO. $83.1
100143 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S132.00 ICE
100144 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $4,400.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88
FEI 100145 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. $2.308.68 Pi
2 R 100146 QUEST INTL. MONITOR SERVICE $735.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
�Zs 100147 KITIMAT AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $8.650.00 MAPPING SERVICES
11 100148 RED WING SHOES S123.77
100149 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $1,533.90 ELECTRIC METER
—N 100150 THE REGISTER S1.986.90 NOTICES 6 ADS
n 100151 REMED TEMP 2 63.
1 100352 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $66.62 HA
100153 RI CO RDWARE
H CORPORATION $69.37 COPIER LEASES
100154 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. 31,140.98
102155 ROCCO-5 TRUCK WRECKING S127.20 TRUCK PARTS
100156 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL $512.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
100157 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC $762.30
10015E OVAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S1.399.84 ELECTRIC PARTS
100159 RVAN-NERCO $562.35 FREIGHT
100160 JOSEPH T. RYERSON L SON. INC. S7
100162 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 5199.20 PARTS CLEANER
100162 SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. $6.400.00 SANDBLASTING
1OC163 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $128.90 PLEITR70 MD7nR RPRAPR
100164 SCHAEFER DIXON ASSOCIATES $6,730.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.11-09-88
100165 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTIL $215,031.90 OCEAN MONITORING H.O.8-10-88
100166 SEA COAST DESIGNS S328.60 OFF
1 0167 SEARS, ROEBUCK S CO. $126.71 LAB SUPPLIES
100168 SEARS, ROEBUCK S CO. $42.91 LAB SUPPLIES
100169 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,030.58 SAFETy 9Nniinc
170 SIERRA COPY S4.386.54 PRINTING
100171 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC ST1.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS
eJ
C 10 NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/B9 PAGE
L REPORT NUMBED AP93
COUNTY SANITATION OISTR ILTS F ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PA TO 06/O7/89 POSTING DATE 06/07/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
100101 72 SLIDE MAKERS WEST 3455.80 PRESENTATION AIDS
e 1073 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS 3212.OD SOTL TESTING
00174 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $8,306.85 POWER
P� 100175 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 19.000.67 DIESEL FUEL
100176 SPEC TECH WESTERN $750.41 WELDING qUPPT.TPq
10017818 AL PLASM SYSTEMS, INC. $241.50 VALVE
10017 SPEECO $1 ,643.58 SCALE MAINTENANCE
109179 STAR TOOL R SUPPLY CO. $1.030.61
e lu.1uu ST RL N6 ART $236.70 BAPR GIC ART SERVICES
100181 SORIA. INC. 1795.00 PHOTOGRAPBIC SERVICES
100 8 H M CORD f 7
1'II 100183 THE SUPPLIERS $3,686.80 HARDWARE
Y 100184 TCH ASSOCIATES 51,849.80 LAB SUPPLIES
4 10,185 TAYLOR-DUNN $ CANT qupplj�A
I OOIB6 TEL-A-TR 1N $114.60 PILH RENTALS - ELECTRICAL SAFETY
�m 100187 THOMAS TEMPORARIES 12,091.19 TIRMFORARY SERVICES
NCI 10018E TOWNE AOVERTI ER 11 3 MAILING SERVICES H.O.4-27-82
100189 TRAVEL TRAVEL $336.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
100190 H.O.
X TRERICE CO. $401.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
19C191 T.S. TRIP, $1.09_4._00 WINDOW CLEANING
'+m 00192 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $63.22 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
300193 J.G. TUCKER 1 SON, INC. 3/.age.13 ANALYZER PARTS
GU 100194 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTEPrINC. 3!l7.00
001PS UATLU
P RLEL SERVICE 1127.30 PARCEL SERVICES
�• 300196 URBAN ALT ERNATTVCS 3152920,00 CONSULTING SERVICES US 89-44
D 100197 VWR SCIENTIFIC &1,534.60
I loot B VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY C . 36r455.59 FlmKGS/VALVRS
lJN 1D0199 VAREC DIVISION Y RI 43.45 PCEY
100204 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP $ 69.50
100201 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,147.67 SAFETY SUPPLIES
1 D0202 V15 TA PAT MY CORP. $02.36 PAINT SUPPLIES
100203 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. INC. $1 465.25 CONSULTING CAN
111204 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE 32,308.06 GUARD SERVICES
10,205 WESTATES CARBON, INC. 1830.46 CURVE
CAIS
100206 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY - $13.026.09
190291 JOHN WILEY 6 SONS. INC. $25.70 PUBLICATION
1002 UR VILLDAN ASSOCIATES $242.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-1
100209 ROURKE 6 WOODRUFF 31 016 10
• 100210 KEROR CORP. $3,335.25 COPIER LEASES
100211 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES $151.45 HARDWARE
e. too
212 RICHARD YOUNG PROD. 3314.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES
213 21EBARTH AND ALPER ---- $242,460.90 CONSTRUCTION P2-37 luu
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID D6/07/89 $5.682,572.47
------------
j�
FOND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/31/89 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
BUKKARY AMOURT
R 12 ACo FUND f 4,300.06
72 F/R FUND 622.7172,]1].2727
190,394.63
�� 77 ACO FUND 186,392.31
is po% FUND
76 ACo FUND 3.421.78
77 OPER FUND 3,136.94
013 OPER POND 480.00
0546 OPER FUND 320.]b
,I 7566 AID FUND 699,781.10
7]614 OPER FUND 3,123.81
X JT OPER FUND 602.029.90
COM ti ai , ,
SELF FUNDED WORKERS Cola' INSURANCE FUND 626.79
tz rl JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 126,669.14
r-�
a
CJ] , $5,674,044.79
37
wi
FUND !A, 91-9 • JT GIST NCRKIN9 CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/24/89 PAGE 1
REPORT 4UMBE4. AP43
COUNTY SANITATION PIL 0 A OUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/21/89 POSTING DATE 06/21/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT QrSCRTPTION
�e e
100244 AAR CONSULTING ENGINEERS $723.16 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-39-I
100241 LINCO eROTFrRS ART MARTS S ENGINEERING PRESENTATION
i' 100291 LINCOLN CARPETS 6 INTERIORS f289.00 CARPET CLEANING
jA 100242 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. $1,585.06 NECHANCAL SUPPLIES
100243 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTA f
100244 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $47.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
100245 AMERICAN CHAIN S GEAR CO. $459.45 CHAIN 6 GEARS
100246 AMERITECH $92.00 C20PXER LEADER
100247 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $11,115.63 EAROWAAE/MECBANICAL SUPPLIES
100248 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $3,217.53 ERFLOYMENT NOTICES 6 AM
Ise 100249 0.pA TEX SERVICES• INC. S9 671.97 IADS
0 2 0 ASSO T SO LE ENG NEERING f240.0G SOIL TESTING
1002" AUDIO VIDEO REPORTING SERVICE $88.80 VIDEOS 21
100252 AUTO SFOP EQUIPMENT CO. S113.69 AUTOMOTIVE w�
0S 25 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $87,846.63 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 �aqa
100254 BANANA BLUE PRINT fIr 198.AS BLUSPRIK)ING fd 100255 BANK OF AMERICA NTRS4 S2.576.23 VISA CARDS. MEETING MUSES
IDD256 P.Y. BANOTTI AND ASSOC. $4,860.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-25.26,P2-32,33,37
' m IOU257 BARR ODOR OF SO.ORANGE CTY.INC $11J14.53 DOOR REPAIRS
I0.0256 B. BATEMAN $575.00 6a
nh 200259 BATTERIES NEST. INC. $623.45 TRUCE PARTS
100260 BAXT ER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 12 r072.3] LAB SUPPLIES
+M 100261 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES. TUE. ND.1R CAR uASO TTOMS
I� I00262 ROBERT 9EIN•YILLIAM FROST S AS $4,600.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33,34
�� 300263 BLOCK R COMPANY. INC. f25.91 ORRICE SUPPLIE9 hp '
100269 9018E CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS
••�, 100265 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $301.46 RADIATOR REPAIRS
100266 BON-A-RUES f197.40 TROD¢ PARTS I.y
0267 1RITMIN EE ELEC C f 4
100268 BR➢WR 4 CALUWELL 35.55C.00 LAB SERVICES
im 100269 BROWN R CALDWELL CONSUL71PG S61.377.47 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-1 W
?A IOC210 PURKE ENGINEERING
1 G02 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES• INC. $3,192..00 SURVEYING SERVICES
100272 GARY G. STREEO $1,653.97 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENO
! 100273 CS COMPANY s1rB85.47 VALVES .J
CALTR • INC. 2.2 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1OC275 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION f440:10 TRAINING .y
.4 IP0276 CA PITIL WESTWARD a960.86 MECANIC SUPPLIES aY
f2r7G6.5 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-I9.P1-34-2
I002" MOT/CASTLE $5,514.19 LAB EQUIPMENT
ID0279 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $b 314.04 PHONE SYSTEM MO➢IPICATIONS
0< 9CHAMPION FENCE CO. $817.130 FENCING ^'
IGO 281 CMEMWEST INDUSTRIES. INC. S59.117.25 FERRIC CHLORIDE 11-09-88
1002E2 A.W. CHESTERTON - L.A. f5.93 O.8B PUMP PARTS fed
TPIB CM Y N 4 .1.� f529.25 PAINT SUPPLIES
m 100284 CHRISTEVE CORP. 51,272.66 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS lu
741
id
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/I4/89 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06POSTING DATE 06/21/89
a
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
• 100285 CORINNE CLAWSON 342.48 MILEAGE REI101URSEMENT LI
A 100286 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY $2,327.06 INSURANCE
1
28T . .S. • I.. r INC. 32.796.55 MECHANICAL PARTS
1OC28B CO MPgE500p CO MF ONCNTS OF CALIF $1 828.50 MECHANICAL PARTS 1°
100209 COMPUSERVE $60.98 COMPDI¢R SERVICES Irs.
---- 6y-To--CONDOR RUBBER R PACKING $1.192.50 RUBBER PRODUCTS
100291 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. f2r099.45 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
l DC292 CONSOLIDATED FREIGMTYATS 391.34 FREIGHT CHARGES I19I
�• IU0293 CON OLIOATED REPROGRAPHICS fS.785.70 BLUEPRINTING �•
100294 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $123.76 ADTLMLTIVE REPAIR
"•I 100295 COUNCIL ON EDUCATION $195.00 SEMINAR Jwl
yyy 100296 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.215.59 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES aY
IOC2 +9T CAL WATER 1204.50 RENTAL EQUIPMENT Iwww
L 1C1298 LAVRY CURTI TRUCK L EOUIFNENT 324•320.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O. 0-13-88
i� IuuzV9 DANIELTIRE SERVICE $1,097.99 TIRES
':A 100300 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS 3296.00 LAB SUPPLIES
100301 DETURIK AND/OR CS CO. 39.255.07 Van PARTS
03 ATE POLYMERS $3 r J06.49 ANIONIC POLYMERS M.O.8-10-88
u ITT 100303 DICMSONS $941.28 HARDWARE
lic 100304 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES S887.75 PRINTING ad
•.1— 100365 OORADO ENTERPRISES.-INC; f9.514.G6 PLANT MAINTERAUCE A REPAIRS w
100306 DUNN EDWAROS CORP. SSs651.1q PAINT SUPPLIES
am 100308 _ ENS-RED PRODUCTS ,263.87 CONSULTING
SUPPLIES IrM
100309 ENS RESCUINC, INC. f1 r263.79 CONSULTING SERVICES - REC. 6 LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS I
1003U9 EBERHARD INC. $62A.T9 OFFICE SUPPLIES #10U310 ERERMARO EQUIPMENT 251. 5 CONSULTING REPAIRS
00322 EFFECTIVEI S. INC. i11273.48 CONSULTING SERVICES - OCGN MONIT08IMC
100312 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY 5273.A0 PRESENTATION AIDS .P
ED AR L. ELLIL JR 9 ENGINEERIGNS SERVICES AN
ICP31A ENABLE $80.00 PUBLICATION W
IOD315 FACTOPY REPRESENTATIVE. INC. $666.95 INSTRUREM PARTS +n
200316 MegSHALL FAIR RED $340.00 DEFERRED COMP OISTIRBUTION d
10 ! JAN S LCONER 51.100.09 CONSULTING SERVICES - SCAQMD MEETS I�
100328 JOHN 8. FALKENSTEIN P.C. 93,185.00 CONSTROCTION SERVICES J-7-4.J-20
100319 FEDERAL PR G AIR FREIGHT
•0 1 320 FIBER GLASS STRUCTURAL ENGR. 32.891.T3 ENGINEERING SERVICES
i� 100321 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1.783.57 FILTER
100322 FIS CMER 1 FOR TER CO. 57.673.38 CHLORINATION PARTS
ID0323 -EL AT 3 VERTICAL CONCRETE $523.00 CONCREIT CUTTING I•'
100320 FLO-SYSTEMS 31,476.87 PUMP PARTS
Lyy $129.36 PERMIT REFUNDOGNEAViNCY1035 UDMAN . L IW
CAMERA - S130:75 FILM ui
++1 200327 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $296.75 PERMITS
••� IOC328 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT f2 3AF.31 PAINT SUPPLIES �.i
!M100329 v A ASSOCIATES 31,025.90 SAFETY COISUL ING
�100330 iO VR OpO CO. / NA6 SYSTEMS 32.278.51 INSTRUlLLNT 67
p
L-ap
�si
. NO 9199 JT DIST•WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 PAGE
[� REPORT NUMBER AP03
CO UN IX ANI A ] R ANjZ
CLAIMS PAID 06/21/89 POSTING DATE 06/21/89
WARRANT NO. V N OR AMO N
100331 FROST ENGINEERING SERVICES CO. $131.78 VALVES
30•.332 CITY Of FULLERTON 3132.71 WATER
3 G.M.A. . AN S1J,620.43 VEHICLE PARTS
100334 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,854.88 TELEPHONE
11
• 5 OON MEEK T i ENGINEERING SERVICES Res 88-72
0336 HADCO INSTRUMENTS 5103.63 GAUGE
100337 HANEY S ASSCC. f1,176.6c HECHANCIAL REPAIRS
100338 HARBOUR ENGINEERING 57 I47.0 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
-1110339 H G. HARDY. INC. 5111.30 BUILDING MATERIALS
100340 FRED A. HARPER $1.450.00 ➢EFERR/D COMP DISTRIBUTION
.• 100341 HARRIN6TON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 3874.47 PION?
4 H RK, NC. SSIN.53 ENGINE PARTS
1003g3 HEWLETT•PACKARD A 66.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
190 4q HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRIC t GENERATORS
9 H L . C. 5998.52 TOOL
100346 HOEPBI6 ER C.V.B. CALIF. , INC. f791.S8 C014R8550R PARTS
I00347 HOLTRACHEM WEST INC. KID599.7 CAUSTIC SODA
100348 DONALD D. MONOMI CNL f300." DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
100149 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $1,U95.05 BATTERIES
• fTl 200353 P.S. HUGHES CO., INC. $S 0 7. 9 PAINT SUPPLIES
••= 100351 CITY OF MUNTINOT ON BEACH 513.60 WATER USEAGE
100352 HUN71NGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP f118.19 RUBBER STAMPS
'•Co 100353 HUNT NGTON VAL NN C C f BIKE PARTS
300354 NCUSTP IAL THREAD 0 PR OCUC IS $1.653.37 FITTINGS
I 100355 INFILCO UEGREMONT. INC. $224.64 FREIGHT
m 110356 INGRAM PAPER 51�2i9.60 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
�+r INVANO }.� �NEh� c . 61,19TL. RENTK EQUIPMENT
W 100358 IN PLACE MACHINING CO. 55.093.00 MACHINE SHAFT
'•� 100359 INTERNATIONAL B INESS MACHINE i PRINTER SUPPLIES
20036. RANCH Y1ATF CIS Tq ICT 520.53 WATER USEAGE
200361 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. S583.75 METERS
I00362 JENSEN TOOLS f ALLOYS tl 0.24 TOOL
100363 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $68.80 ELECTRIC PARTS
100364 KAMAN BEARINGS 5 SUPFLY $667.79 FITTINGS
ION"
MANER CONRAN f21,51T.99 TOOLS
lid 66 AY-PAY. INC. INSTRUMENTS
100367 NEENAN SUPPLY $94.02 REPAIR KIT
100368 KFY E T OK VALVE f 955.]R VALVE
6 NI OCNINC. f673.750.00 VOC CREDITS M.0.5-I0-89
100370 KING BEARING. INC. $843.71 MACHINE SUPPLIES
IOC371 DONALD E. NINN Y 9815.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
100372 KIRST PUMP R MA NINE WOPKS 12.742.02 PUMP PARTS
100373 EASTMAN KODAK CO. 357.19 LAB SUPPLIES
I OD374 MARTIN KORDICN SP !8 0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-29 5-31
L. u N S1J9.99 WELDING SUPPLIES
100376 LA SEP•SUPPLIES 9 SERVICE $243.58 PRINT SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YOFNING CAFITAL PROCESSING UATE 6/14/69 PAGE 4
[� REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY S4N1T6T10N O16TRIC S OF GP.ANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID U6/21/89 POSTING 047E C6/21/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
L 093T7 LE ROY CRANDALL A ASSOC; 3682.11 CONSULTING SERVICES
300376 LIEBERT DAS$TOY A FRIER SON f 6 0 s I AR R¢GI III
N
100379 MIT ROUE CORP. 64.719.61 Van REPAIRS
10036O K.P. LINDSTROM. INC. $13,497.27 CONSULTING SERVICES - MASTER PLAN
101381 MS OAT! SERVICL CORP. f80. 0LAS SUPPLIES
.R 3B2 ACO C0 31J9.8C SERVICE AGREEMENT
300183 MAGNUS MOBILITY SYSTEMS $306.34 TOOL
0 ]P.0 NA INTENANC PR00 C f 4 S
65 M LCOL PINNIE . IN . f2.4881.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES
100386 MAkVAC ELECTRONICS 3142.73 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
100387 MATT - CHLOR INC. S2.932.49
1 388 MCKENNA ENGF. A EQUIP. $5.454.12 PONE PUTS
00 1389 MERCHANTS f MANUFACTURERS S60O.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
10039E MICRO"', COMPUTER $943.40 so
100391 MIOLAND MFG. COMP. f436.12 CHLORINATION PARTS
100392 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. f629.4! gpPETY SUPPLIES
100393 MOORE A TABER f4 T06.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES
U STRIES, INC. 3217.4E BEARINGS
IOC395 MOTOROLA, INC. f21.E84.98 PAGERS
m 100356 MOTOROLA CELLULAR E4 CE fT9 9 CELLULAR SERVICES
= 100397 WEAL SUPPLY CO. 51.11 T.63 FITTINGS
1OJ 398 CITY OF NENPO RT BEACH $4.93 WATER USEAGE
100399 NORTH MO N6INC. $ MGM PART
10040E OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES f406.34 SAFETY CLASSES
--I 1SC401 NAT. INST. OF STANDARDS s196.09 LAB SUPPLIES
1 09 0 YMP1 HEN A 9 CHLORIN! M.0.10-12-88
100/01 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY f1T3.66 ILECTRIC SUPPLIES
r 100404 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 5972.20 CHEMICALS
BFBCMTY CASES
100406 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 583.92 EMPLOYEE HEALTH PLAN CONTRIBUTION
100407 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $9.493.49 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
1004C8 90 SEWER VIDEOS
100409 P SI550.R0 flOB PARTS
100410 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $298.81 SAPETT SUPPLIES
10041 PACTF C BE L f14.5 TBLEPBONB
p 59]. 6 CELLULAR SERVICES
100413 FALL PAFANEN 5300.00 FREE MIN - TORICS EPIDERULOGY PROGRAM
•! 200414 ASR ANALYSIS AND/DR f9 1.9C PUMP ANALYSIS
4 A K N 4T ON . INC 3422.91 PUBLICATION
10091E PARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $2,609.69 C RESSOR PARTS
100427 PARTS UNLIMITED $535.44 AOTOMOTIVE PARTS
0 41 PE-HP C $26.95 PUBLICATION
100419 PEAT, MARWICK, MAIN A CO. $5,000.00 AUDITING SERVICES
150420 ROY PENOERGRAFT $440.00 DEFERRED WHP DISTIBUTION
1 OC421 P NMAL COMPANY f609.00 CORE DRILLING
100422 PM OTC S SOUND CO. i1.920.29 COMPUTER 9UPPLIBS/EpUIPM8N1'
( JNO NO 91-9 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESS IN6 DATE 6/14/89 PAGE
REPORT NUMGEP AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/21/89 POSTING GATE 06/23 fig
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
100423 PICKWICK PAPER S1.J13.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES
A 106424 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS. INC. s44.455.45 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
100425 �OLYPURE. INC. $22,685.79 CATIONIC POLYMER H.0.3-8-89
100426 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $3,950.60 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-BS
100427 PULSAFEEDER sl 453.3 PUMP PARTS
9 01428 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. IN 13 PUMP PARTS
IAI 100429 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. 5744.56 TRASR REMOVAL
1OC430 PECYC, INC. 166.080.0L SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
VALVE100431 RED INC. 14,559.88 VALVE PARTS
u 1CO432 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $2,347.00 ELECTRIC MILIEUS
IH� 100433 REMEDY TEND S579.08 TEMPORARY SERVICES
GU439 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM s390D0.JD POSTAGE
]09435 THE REP V8LI RUFPLY CO. f277.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
IOC436 NENOLD POWER TRANSMISSION ss'iao MCHANICa REPAIRS
100437 RICHARDS9 WATSON E GERSHON $17.402.62 LEGAL S68VICES 4-8-8]
106438 RICOH CORPORATION 169.37 COPIER LEASES
100439 RICHARD ROLFE 1292 MEETING MERGE
108440 ROSEMON7 ANALYTICAL $1,915.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
l OCA-I POSE MOUNT/UNI LOC $298.78 INSTREffi1T SUPPLIES
M 300441 JOSEPH T. RYERSON s SON9 I6.C. $229.47 STEEL
= 100043 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. S265.60 PARTS GLEANER
10.... SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. s960.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
LET 100445 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CP. S231.04 LAB SUPPLIES
100446 SCIENCE APPLICeTICNS INT-L 5111.683.8E OCEAN SAMPLING M.0.8-ID-88
1GG447 SCA COAST DESIGNS S310.10 OFFICE FURNITURE
100448 SEA-ILAN $4,615.00 LAB R UIPMENT
. 1 100449 CITY OF SEAL BEACH s108.50 WATER USEAGE
100450 SEWER EQUIP. CO. OF AMERICA $1.192.96 TOOLS
00451 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S174,28 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
1D0452 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS 1616.00 SOIL TESTING
100453 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $250.90 VIOLATION PEE
0454 HUGE SOULRGES 1 17QETINC MENGE
IV0455 SOUTH COAST DODGE 319.77 AUTOMOBILE PARTS
100456 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. s376.318.15 POWER
100457 $0. CAL. GAS CO. $15,382.43 NATURAL CAS
100458 SOUTHERN COUNTIES CIL CO. $19.049.27 DIESEL FUEL
41 160459 SPEC TECH WESTCPN S1.243.43 WELDING SUPPLIES
lsq46c SPECIAL ELA< SYSYEMS, INC. TOEING
IQL461 STARBUCK TRUCK REFINISHING $3.175.00 SAND BLASTING
100462 STAR TOOL B SUPPLY CO. 92018:52 TOOLS
100463 SURIAINC, $539,ac VISUAL SUPPORT SERVICES
IBC464 SUMMIT STEEL $74.69 STEEL
100465 SUPELCO. INC. $254.55 LAB SUPPLIES
ICC456 SUPERIOR SWEEPING SOUTH S225,eb STREET SWEEPING
100467 THE SUPFLIEFS S4.654.69 HARDWARE
.d 100468 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. $106.03 TOOLS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14189 PAGE 6
L, REPORT NUMBER AP43
OUNTT SANITATION OISTAICTS OF ORANGE CO T
S
CLAIMS PAID C6121189 POSTING DATE 06/21/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AND UN:
DESCRIP ION
100469 TAN TAKAMINL 64.57O.G0 CONTRACT CROUNGSNEEPINC
• IOC470 TAYLOR�DUN 9633.20 CART PARTS
1OD471 TECHNICAL P40DUCTS L CTRLS f954.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
100472 TEKHAR COMPANY $467.43 LAS SUPPLIES
100473 THERMO ANALYTICAL. INC./NNACAL $72.00 LAB SERVICES
G4 4 H AR S f376.30 TE2BORARY SERVICES
100475 THOMASON MECHANICAL CORP. $1.736.25 MECHANICAL PARTS
100476 TORRANCE LOSS CONTROL.CORP. $895.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
100477 TOW NE ADVERTISERS f87.11 NAILING SERVICES
'•I 1Ot478 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE. INC. $165.89 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES
N 100479 TRAVEL TRAVEL S988.00 LAAm SERVICES
14 . T.S. TP PP S490.00 WINDOW CLEANING
1OV481 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $810.97 TRUCK PARTS
1064E2 J.G. TUCKER S SON INC. S675.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1C0483 THE REGENTS TN $50.00 PUBLICATION
100484 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTER.INC. $138.43 TRUCK PARTS
100485 UNOCAL $263.02 UNLEADED GASOLINE
ID0486 THE UNISOURCE CORP. $8,170.59 PAPER
100487 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $119.20 PARCEL SERVICES
n m IOC4R8 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR $319.75 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
= IRO 4A9 VWR SCIENTIFIC $482.27 LAB SUPPLIES
300490 VALLEY CITIES SUFPLV CO. 56.268.15 VALVE PARTS
IOP491 4R UN INSTRUMENT GROUP S1,464.25 LAB SUPPLIES
10C 492 VEn ICLE SFRING SE PVICE 5211.30 TRUCK PARTS
ICC493 VERTEX SYSTEMS f1.30d.06 COMPUTER PROGRAM MAINTENANCE
100.94 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5840.42 PAINT SUPPLIES
' 1 100495 RICHARD U. VON LANGEN $343.64 MEETING EXPENSE
CIY 100496 JOHN R. YAPLES f537.80 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT
100497 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE $2 339.10 GUARD SERVICES
100-98 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUFFLY $53.J27.02 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-10-88
100499 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $588.25 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
10P500 WESTRUY INTERNATIONAL S124.59 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-2.2-26-3.2-27.2-28
100502 ROURKE L WOODRUFF $43,139.52 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.10-14-87
106503 XEROX CORP. Sl J6O.G0 COPIER LEASES SUPPLIES
4.6 C LAB SERVICES
300505 RICHARD YOUNG FROG. $1.299.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES
-----------------
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 16/21/89 $2;169.447.6P
�L
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/14/89 PAGE 7
L REPORT NUMBER M43
COU
NTY SANITATION DISTRPCTB OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAI PAID
0 111R4 p0 TINC DAY¢ 06 31 89
SUNNMY ANOUM'
01 OPER FOND 8 73.66
' 02 OPER FUND 3.962.33
• 02 AGO FOND 84.00
e
` 03 OPEN POND 25.209.11
0
3 AGO FUND 228100
46 OPER ND 1,889.24 PO
06 AM POND 852.00
06 FIR FUND 129.00
^I 07 OPEN FUND 6.181.82
014 OPER FUND 20.53
014 AM FUND 888.00
46 OPER FWD 1,336.60
0566 AGO FUND 6.954.65
1 %614 OPER PUOD 240.00
W m T OPEN FORD I.M.09M7
= C0" 842.081.28
47.'p SELF FORDED NORKERS COKP INSURANCE POND 11.161.01
.T DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 175,031.33
52,155,341.21
I••I
�vl
I�.
EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the
hour of 7:30 p.m., July 12, 1989, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 and 14.
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
reating a Capital Facilities Fund
and terminati ng
the Accumulated That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Capital Outlay and antl the the following resolutions, creating a
Facilities Revolving Fund Capital Facilities Fund and terminating
the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund and
the Facilities Revolving Fund in each District:
DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO.
1 89-81-1
2 89-82-2
3 89-83-3
6 89-85-6
7 89-86-7
13 89-88-13
14 89-89-14 (Capital Fund title
change only)
Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District's 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
. following amounts:
District 1
Operating Fund $ 9,123,000
Capital Facilities Fund 15,177,000
Construction Fund 7,082,000
Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 70,875
TOTAL $ 31,452,875
- ` 07/12/89
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1 89-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District's 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
District 2
Operating Fund $ 24,828,000
Capital Facilities Fund 59,579,000
Construction Fund 17,268,000
TOTAL $301,675,000
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1969-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District's 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
District 3
Operating Fund $ 24,746,000
Capital Facilities Fund 54,620,000
Construction Fund 18,746,000
Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1951 227,000
TOTAL $ 98,339,000
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District's 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
District 6
Operating Fund $ 5,552,000
Capital Facilities Fund 8,826,000
TOTAL $ 14,378,000
�../ -2-
07/12/89
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1 9-9 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District's 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
�✓ following amounts:
District 7
Operating Fund $ 11,262,000
Capital Facilities Fund 25,083,000
Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1962 507.112
Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1970 473,000
TOTAL $ 37,325,112
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1959- fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District's 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
District 13
Operating Fund $ 743,000
Capital Facilities Fund 9,947,000
TOTAL $ 10,690.000
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and unanimously
8"roving 19 -9 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District's 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
District 14
Operating Fund $ 8479000
Capital Facilities Fund 12,963,000
TOTAL $ 13,810,000
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full , true and correct copy of
minute entries of the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 12th day of July,
1989.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of July, 1989.
Secretary of 1{le Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 and 14
-3-
EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the
hour of 7:30 p.m., July 12, 1989, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
L� California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13 and 14.
DISTRICT 5 This 12th day of July, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. ,
Adjournment of meeting due to lack being the time and place for the Regular
of quorum Meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange
County, California, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 5, the
meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
DISTRICT 11 This 12th day of July, 1989, at 7:30 p.m.,
Adjournment of meeting due to lack being the time and place for the Regular
of quorum Meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 of
Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum present in District
No. 11, the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary to
7:30 p.m., Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center,
10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m., July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall 8, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 12, 1989.
w...f
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. ,
j Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
`...� The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m., July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m., July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m. , July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
Wednesday, July 19, 1989, at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater
Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley, to consider the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p.m. , July 12, 1989.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full , true and
correct copy of minute entries of the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the
12th day of July, 1989.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of July, 1989.
Secretary of-the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
BS/FORMS/89
F3.07.JT.1,.2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government code Section 54954.2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting
on 19 $9 was duly posted for public inspection
at the main lobby the Districts' offices on S
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
day of 19�.
Rita��ecretary Of
each of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6 , 7, 11, 13 6
14 of Orange County, California
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
PNITATION
5 topolitan 0 �If,
�1� Aml `o�'P9 TQ
S+nce 1954
oggNGE C00
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
Al ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
June 28, 1989 iOSAA ELLI6 AVENUE
Fo.Box 9121
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92726.6127
9141962.2411
TO: Boards of Directors
SUBJECT: Transmittal of Individual Districts' Budget Recommendations for 1989-90
Fiscal Year
The proposed 1989-90 budgets for each of the nine Districts are enclosed for your
review and consideration. The budget package was reviewed by the Executive
Committee on June 28th. The Executive Committee recommended that these proposed
budgets be presented to the respective Boards for consideration at the July 12th
joint meeting.
SUMMARY
The proposed 1989-90 budgets total $315.7 million, down 13.7% from the 1988-89
budget total of $365.9 million.
The following Table I compares the proposed 1989-90 budgets with the 1988-89
budgets to highlight the major areas of changes in the upcoming year:
TABLE I
COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
INCREASE 1989-90
REQUIREMENTS 1988-89* 1989-90* DECREASE % OF BUDGET
JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0, M 6 R $ 38.9 $ 44.5 $ 5.6 14.1%
COLLECTION SYSTEM 6 OTHER DISTRICT 0, M a R 5.5 6.9 1.4 2.2
TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 95.0 102.7 7.7 32.5
DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 50.6 60.7 10.1 19.2
DEBT SERVICE (G.O. 8 C.O.P.) 12.6 11.8 0.8 3.7
SUB-TOTAL $202.6 A226.6 24.0 71.7%
CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $124.5 $ 49.1 $(75.4) 15.6
OTHER RESERVES 38.8 40.0 1.2 12.7
SUB-TOTAL $163.3 89.2 74.2 28.3%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $365.9 $315.7 50.2 100.0%
FUNDING
CARRY-OVER $ 32.0 $ 43.0 $ 11.0 13.6%
APPROPRIATED RESERVES 248.0 169.4 78.6 53.7
SUB-TOTAL 280.0 $ 212.4 $ 67.6 67.3%
TAX ALLOCATION (1% SHARE) $ 28.1 $ 29.7 $ 1.6 9.4
TAX LEVY FOR BOND REDEMPTION 0.6 0.2 (0.4) 0.1
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS 2.7 2.7 --- 0.9
FEES 29.5 49.6 20.1 15.6
INTEREST 8 OTHER 25.0 21.1 3.9 6.7
SUB-TOTAL 85.9 103.3 17.4 32.7%
TOTAL FUNDING $365.9 $ 315.7 50.2 100.0%
* ADJUSTED FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS
The average source and application of the 1989-90 budgetary dollars are depicted
in the followina charts:
C
TaxLevy.01
R.16 VESONy0
TSERTREATMENT DEB PLANT
EXPANSION
.32
Budgeted Requirement Dollar Source of Budgeted Revenue Dollar
Total $315. 7 Million Total $315.7 Million
The Districts' share of the 1% ad valorem property tax levy, allocated in
accordance with Proposition 13, is appropriated to the operating funds of the
respective Districts to pay operations, maintenance and replacement/
rehabilitation (0, M 8 R) costs pursuant to the Revenue Program (approved by the
Joint Boards in April , 1979) adopted to comply with regulations of the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State Water Resources Control
Board (SWRCB) .
We have assumed for budgetary purposes that average annual tax allocations will
increase at the following percentages, based on the actual increases over the
past three years:
TABLE II
District • %
1 7.02
2 8.72
3 9.74
5 8.35
6 8.00
7 8.00
11 7.98
z Districts 13 and 14 receive no ad valorem tax allocations.
-2-
When tax revenues become insufficient to fund the cost of operating, maintaining
and rehabilitating the Districts' facilities, alternative funding sources have
to be adopted to supplement the taxes.
The viable alternative methods are:
(1) Hearing and separate levy of separate Supplemental User Fee charge on
the property tax bill
(2) Separate user charge collected on water purveyor's utility bill
(3) Direct billing by Districts of a separate user charge
(4) Election to authorize separate ad valorem tax levy.
Under the Districts' Revenue Program, industrial/large commercial users are
currently charged on the basis of actual use and receive credit for ad valorem
taxes and Supplemental User Fees pursuant to the uniform industrial waste
ordinance adopted in 1970 and amended in 1975 and 1983. Institutional/tax-exempt
users are also billed separately by the Districts based on actual use where
appropriate pursuant to Board policy.
The timing of any supplemental user charge implementation will depend upon the
fiscal year in which the ad valorem tax allocation and available reserves become
inadequate to cover 0, M 8 R costs. This is reported as Fund Balance on the
Operating Fund section of the cash flow projections.
Districts 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13, have implemented Supplemental User Fee
programs. The following Summary of Operations and Maintenance Financing,
Table Iv, and the cash flows accompanying the individual budgets for Districts
1, 5, 6 and 11 incorporate the recently approved fee increase adopted as part of
their revised long-range financial program. The phased fee increase program
approved by the District 13 Directors last year was not necessary for 1989-90,
but has been incorporated in future years. Supplemental user fees for all
Districts for the remainder of the 10-year planning period have been increased
or implemented as needed to fund operations, maintenance and rehabilitation and
debt service as recommended in the Master Plan Financial Plan.
Our projections indicate that District 2 will need to establish supplemental
user fees beginning in 1990-91 because the existing ad valorem tax revenues and
industrial user fees will be inadequate to meet their operations and maintenance
requirements. District 7, it appears, will not have to consider supplemental
user fees until 1991-92. District 14 is fully financed by Irvine Ranch Water
District charges.
The Districts' total funding requirements for the next ten years for
construction of new facilities and 0, M 8 R expenses to handle rising sewage
flows and to provide improved levels of treatment in response to more stringent
EPA and SWRCB regulations are summarized on the following Tables:
-3-
TABLE III
SUMMARY OF PROJECTED EXPENDITURES*
1989/90- 1994/95- 10-YEAR
1993/94 1998/99 TOTAL
Treatment Plant Construction $ 502,943,000 $ 250,062,000 $ 753,005,000 30.2%
Trunk Sewer Construction 123,720,000 52,423,000 176,143,000 7.1
Sub-total $ 626,663,000 $ 302,485,000 $ 929,148,000 37.3%
Treatment Plant and Sewer $ 324,374,000 $ 593,950,000 $ 918.324,000 36.8%
O,MB R
Debt (Including CDP's and RA's) 278,436,000 367,649,000 646,085,000 25.9
Sub-total $ 602,810,000 $ 961,599,000 $1,564,409,000 62.7%
Total $1,229,473,000 $1,264.084.000 $2,493,557,000 100.0%
* Adjusted for inter-district transactions
TABLE IV
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FINANCING*
1989/90-1998/99
(Millions of Dollars)
Revenues r Expenses
1989-90 Total I � 1998-99
Dist. Beginning Available Operation Debt Ending
No. Reserves Fees Taxes Other Funding 8 Mtce. Service Reserves
1 3.2 105.7 27.7 5.0 142.6 81.4 47.0 14.2
2 9.4 291.4 119.0 17.7 437.5 275.9 120.9 40.7
3 5.0 291.8 160.1 20.2 477.1 275.0 144.3 57.8
5 3.4 41.8 34.3 3.4 82.9 44.0 30.3 8.6
6 2.0 59.7 17.8 3.2 82.7 50.8 24.7 7.2
7 6.5 67.7 56.5 6.2 136.9 84.4 34.6 17.9
11 2.8 75.7 31.0 5.0 114.5 63.9 38.7 11.9
13 .4 14.7 .1 15.2 14.8 .4
14 .4 27.4 4 28.2 26.9 1.3
Total 33.1 976.9 446.4 61.2 1517.6 917.1 440.5 160.0
*Not adjusted for inter-district transactions. See individual Districts' cash flow statements
for details.
-4-
Capital financing for sewers and treatment and disposal facilities will be
provided by accumulated construction reserves and interest earnings thereon,
connection and capital replacement fees, sale of capacity rights and issuance of
debt. The proceeds from a sale of certificates of participation issued by
Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3 in August, 1986 are included in the following Summary
Of Capital Financing, Table V. The three Districts which sold certificates of
participation (COPS) will pay their proportionate shares of the next year's
Joint Works capital expenditures largely from the proceeds of the securities
sale as well as accumulated reserves and current revenue. The other six
Districts (Districts Nos. 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14) will pay their proportionate
shares of 1989-90 Joint Works capital expenditures from existing capital
reserves and other capital revenues.
The Master Plan Financial Plan recommends borrowing (ie COPs) to finance future
construction in order to stabilize user fees. This approach is reflected in the
cash flows and in Tables IV and V. For discussion purposes all debt is assumed
to be at a fixed interest rate of 8% for 20 years.
TABLE V
SUMMARY OF CAPITAL FINANCING'
1989/90-1998/99
(Millions of Dollars)
1989-90 Receipts Total Expend 1998-99
Dist. Beginning �- � Available Capital Debt Ending
No. Reserves Fees Borrowing Other Funding Outlay Service Reserves
1 14.0 22.5 80.0 15.5 132.0 80.3 33.8 17.9
2 59.8 80.2 159.0 31.1 330.1 257.3 64.4 8.4
3 57.8 44.8 241.0 37.1 380.7 274.0 79.4 27.3
5 5.0 9.4 42.0 12.3 68.7 56.0 7.0 5.7
6 7.3 10.8 29.0 10.2 57.3 47.0 4.0 6.3
7 21.3 27.4 47.0 8.7 104.4 93.6 7.0 3.8
11 4.5 11.2 54.0 15.0 84.7 66.0 8.5 10.2
13 7.1 47.6 14.8 69.5 31.0 38.5
14 1.5 58.8 3.4 63.7 63.1 .6
Total 178.3 312.7 652.0 148.1 1291.1 968.3 204.1 118.7
'Not adjusted for inter-district transactions. See individual Districts' cash flow statements.
The Districts presently treat 266 MGD of which 135 MGD (60 MGD now in service at
Plant No. 1 and 75 MGD now in service at Plant No. 2) is secondary treatment.
The above projections assume continuation of the Districts' 301(h) NPDES Permit
beyond its 1990 expiration date. Should the Directors desire or the EPA and the
RWQCB require full secondary treatment the capital (and 0, M 8 R) casts would
increase substantially. The preliminary estimate from the Master Plan Financial
Plan is that capital costs for the 10-year period would rise $154 million. EPA
and SWRCB have previously funded up to 870. of the cost of construction of
advanced treatment facilities but congress has eliminated the construction grant
program and replaced it with a revolving loan program. Thus, virtually all
future treatment plant improvements as shown on CORF Schedule B-1 (yellow) will
be a local responsibility.
-5-
The real long-term impact of federal and state requirements on District fiscal
planning will be on operating costs. While, as noted, EPA and SWRCB have funded
a portion of constructing facilities for a higher degree of treatment in the
past, the added ongoing operating costs have always been paid entirely by the
local community. The approved Joint Operating budget (green) increased by
14.5 percent for 1989-90. We expect that operating costs will continue to rise
due to inflationary influences, rising flows, increased costs of sludge
disposal , and other regulatory requirements imposed by such organizations as the
EPA, RWQCB and South Coast Air Quality Management District. The ten-year cash
flow projections presented on the following pages for "All Districts" reflect
these increasing operating costs on line 11. Under full secondary treatment we
estimate that our 0, M 8 R costs would increase $15-20 million annually when all
facilities are on line.
Over the past two years the Districts have undertaken the Action Plan which is a
comprehensive review and update of our wastewater management plan. The Action
Plan includes a new facilities master plan and an EIR that will enable the
Districts to determine the optimum level of treatment for protecting public
health and the marine environment in preparation for renewal of the NPDES
Permit. We are also assessing the potentially significant impacts of proposed
new air quality regulations on the Districts' financing and operating
requirements. The Directors are currently considering the adoption of this new
30-year Master Plan.
Staff, as part of the Revenue Program requirements, has reviewed connection fee
schedules to determine the feasibility of this revenue source for financing the
escalating cost of providing sewerage facilities to meet long-term wastewater
collection, treatment and disposal requirements. Districts 2, 3, 7, and 13 have
increased their fee schedules, during the past year and all Districts will have
the same fee effective July 1, 1989. The Master Plan Financial Plan recommends
a change in the connection fee calculation to include future facilities and
staff will bring a proposal to the Directors after the Master Plan has been
adopted. District No. 14's capital costs are financed by IRWD. User fees are
also a potential source of funding capital needs for rehabilitation and
replacement, treatment improvements, and debt repayment, as well as 0, M 8 R.
The ten-year estimates include anticipated receipt of $4.7 million from SAWPA
for sale of an additional 7 MGD capacity rights and payments on its existing
8 MGD capacity in the Joint Works Treatment Facilities.
In the final analysis, the fiscal posture of each District depicted in the
enclosed projections will , of course, depend on economic trends and development
activity within the service areas of each member agency, and the decisions of
legislative and regulatory officials relative to the levels of treatment and
environmental controls to be required.
However, regardless of the outcome of the NPDES permit renewal , it is painfully
clear that all Districts will have to utilize a combination of increased user
and connection fees and employ debt financing to maintain their fiscal integrity
and keep pace with the rising costs of sewage treatment and disposal and
increasingly stringent public health and environmental protection requirements.
-6-
FUND DESCRIPTIONS
The budgets have been itemized separately for the operating, capital and general
obligation debt retirement elements of each District's budgetary structure to
assist Directors in analyzing the projections.
Operating Funds
Sixty percent of projected cost increases are attributable to compliance
with federal , state and other regulatory agency mandates such as improved
treatment, ocean monitoring, air emissions control and sludge disposal.
Inflationary trends and new debt service are also reflected. A review of
the operating fund cash flow estimates (top section of the cash flow)
allows the Directors of each Board to determine when their respective
District may have to consider alternative user charge funding or adjustments
to the existing Supplemental User Fee program. Supplemental User Fees have
been increased or implemented as needed for these cash flow projections
(except for District 13) in order to maintain prudent reserves and to
provide funding for the tax receipt "dry period". The fees are estimates
only, are rounded to the closest $5.00 and can be found immediately under
the fiscal year on the cash flows. No fees will be adjusted without
specific Board action.
Last year the District 13 Board authorized a 12% per year increase in the
Supplemental Use Fee if it was required. A change in the method of
assessing the fee resulted in more income this year than was previously
projected, making an increase for 1989-90 unnecessary. The 12% increase
has been reflected in future years on the projected cash flows as that is
the last direction of the Board.
Capital Funds
The capital funds include the capital facilities fund and the construction/
COP repayment fund. The capital facilities fund is a new fund this year
resulting from the combining of the accumulated capital outlay fund and the
facilities revolving fund. This fund finances each District's share of
Joint Works plant expansion costs, as well as the individual Districts'
trunk sewer and pump station requirements. Treatment plant projects are
listed on CORF Schedule B-1 (yellow) , and collection system projects are
listed on separate schedules with each District's budget recommendations.
The Construction/COP repayment fund serves two purposes. This fund
accounts for the construction of those facilities authorized in the 1986
COP issue for Districts 1, 2 and 3 and also for the repayment of the
principal and interest.
Bond Funds
Outstanding general obligation bond debt and interest obligations can be
met by an annual tax levy which is allowable under Proposition 13.
Districts 2 and 7 previously transferred capital and operating reserves
which, at present value, were to pay the 1951, 1958, 1962 and 1970 general
obligation bonds for the remainder of the life of the bonds. District 3
also transferred a portion of its ACO fund reserves to its bond funds to
pay for its 1984-85 and 1985-86 bond retirement and interest, but it
discontinued this practice in 1986-87 as its financial position weakened.
-7-
COUNTY RAWITATION DISTRICT - ALL /B9
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOP PPAR 1
FISCAL YEARS 1989-90 THROUGH 1998-99
LINE 1989-Po im-91 IWI-92 1992.93 1993-94 5-nor tint IW4-Po 10-Year Total LINE
---- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ............ ............. .............
----
OPERATING iUND
1 Rnervu 6 Crry-Mar iron lest Year 33,OB..... -----/.... 4],A0,0.0 ...-I... ]9,642,000 .......... .......... .......... 1
REVENUE aaxX At z 6611ggqq3p3p }g5]g2
L Test: 1�5Wo6�t"B0a1NsteriPo �`;°`,000 41;160;OW00 66,01 'm ]5;554.000 05�6611,000 281;450;ODD
50,074,004, 9;52f'000 4
5 Othe, 423,W0 1,OW,000 1,3n,W0 1,556,000 2,012,000 6,325,000 21,STEP 0W 21,4 4,000 5
6 Interest S MisceltatreOus Ircane 2,5]9,WO 2,SW,WO 3,001,000 4,045,000 5,2OO,OnO 17,MS,OW 33,740,000 56.125,000 6
] interest
Transfer 4,6o1,D00 4,601,000 4,601,000 ]
B Other Re Hggl 0 0 B
___________ _____ _••-__•_•__ -......-..- ----------... ..----------- -----------
9 TUTAI REVENUE 58,0B2,W0 82,663-W0 109,014,OW 126,]92,0 - 145,101,W0 519,652,OW 964,353,000 I,AD4,005,OW 9
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------• -
------------ ....---.....- -----------
10 70TX AVAILABLE FUNDING p1,166,OPo 112,3]O,WO 156,]22,WO 184,SPo,OW 222,R3,OPo 552,M,OW 1,0%jis,000 1,51],089,OW 10
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ------------- -----------
EXPEWAWES gp3 ]p5 621
1z1 CoDr. OfoJ inYtstWWoo M BNOIF0 Other Oper. 6,020;000 51,2212,000 58,]31 8 93))6;0ppOU grog y0yf1 000 3aI,WEA00 550,M,000 88899.451'0W 12
2 other ExpaM(Nrn 50, 0 32,3W OW 35 850,000 52 ]00 000 37,00,00 303,500,000 KO,SOO,OW 13
........... ........... ........... ....•--.... .-----•-•-• ------------- ---.......... -----------
14 TOTAL EXPENDITURES SI,i59,W0 ]6,662,W0 Po,924,W0 iW,94B4OW 131,M1,OUY 46%374,000 89],450,M) I'm,NA,OW 14
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ......5'2--�.... ............. .......
...-
16 Seatt Year's DryVP rtedtiwdi,IBTRcHYdrements 25;3 6,000 56;BPo5IMO 66;274,000 51:659.0000 64,6659,000 64,,659,001) 100;2�503;000 f01;206 000 16
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- -"----------- -_.........
17 Fund Balance or (Deficit) 14,3]t,WO 10,9W,W0 9,024,WO t],9BS,OW 26,]OS,OW 26,]81,W0 51,0W,OW 5I.M. W 17
CAPI JAL NIm(5) vvvc-va=v= =-=_=cc vvvmvvevvv vavvmvava vvvvvvvm vmmm-m vcvvv - mmvmem-
.
18 Reserves 6 Carry-aver From Last Year 178,354,000 21,220,000 208,9]8,000 88,915,000 168,9107,000 178,354,000 210,2W,000 1]8,354,000 18
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ------------- -----------
REVENUE
19 Gratin - Z 746,000 2,746,000 2,766,W0 19
20 Fees: Connection 15;618,000 17,520,000 19,9]4,000 u,02],ON 2},44],000 98,SB6,W0 116,239,W0 216,825,W0 20
21 Industrial Waste 1,M,OM 2,18f,000 2,512,OW 2,BB8,OW 3,320,000 12,803,W0 25,R1,000 38,554,000 21
22 Ouppl�ental War 10 306 W0 16 ]3310g916,000 ],'y$1g4pp2,000 B,51B,W0 on 15.1twom ff)y)y1,�]03 000 AT }5638',p0Wp0O 1f,p2��92p00Q,0pp0pp0 58 o]5U010 No 22
26 OMer000
24 Sale e;BesMiscel leNhneWs Income 8 1 0:O Q 326,no 1 600;000 t1: .000 159 0 0 000 W,40W;000 304;1{8;000 4a00,S6o 0 t104;1 8 NO 26
..:.-.:-•-• ----------- ----•----- ---------- -....----- ------------- •------------ ...........
27 TOTAL REVENUE 52,]66,OW 3]3,360,000 42,32],000- 212,359,000- 139,6]0,000- 820,482,000 291,890,000 1,112,3]2,000 27
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ------------- -----------
28 TOTAL AVAILABLE FMING 231,120,000 444,580,000 251,30.5,000 301,294,W0 308,5M,000 996,836,OUD 502,189,000 1,20,726,000 28
........... ........... ........ . . . . .
EXPENDITURES ���� zz
29 More o Joint Wrks Treatment Plant 136i8g5�00a 153,5 4�000 124,9990 ON 7,538,00 is,i15,o0 124;506,000 502,943,000 252;R2;000 106,M�0W 31
SO District collection System 998 31 [OP Paymnt 11,088,000 10,
32 Re)nWrstmmt Agreement Payments WOOD 109,OW 10p9q OW 32
33 Inter-fund Transfer 4,601,ON 4,601'OW 4,W1 0SO 33
34 Other Expenditures 4,593,NO 0.361,000 1,]0],OW 26,454,000 1],045,W0 Po,160,000 23,9S,W0 132,094,OW 34
35 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 159,900,OW 255,602,000 162,3]O,WO 132,385,000 98,2W,W0 OBB,531,OW 383,850,000) 1,1]2,38),000 35
36 Reserves 4 Carry-over to Next Year 71,220,000 201119931001, 08,935,OW 168,Po9,000 210,299,OW 210,299,OW 119,119,00D 118,339,OW 36
CT0IENEW SANITATION DISTRICT
FLOW Poll.J29
FISCAL YEARS 1989-% THROUGH 1998-W
LINE 1989-90 19W-91 1W1-W IW2-W 1993-% 5-Year lotel Im:FIT 10-Veer.ToteI LIVE
.... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ..._........ .._... __..._ ....... ..... ....
PoW IIRm(S)
............
S] Reserves 6 carry-aver Fr®Lest Year 9R,000 348,000 65,0% 14,e00 .M,M..... 9]],000 .n,wO..... ......0 J]
RFWIOrt p q� pp ��
39 Fax reef 8 Xi scel leftws Ilxaro 245;� HIM I SNOOD 15:0"m 16;000 LIl,= - 64�000 505;GO 00 0 39
40 Other In. 0 40
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............. ............. ...........
41 TOTAL REVENUE259,000 28,000 1W,000 30,000 21,000 533,000 65,000 5%,%0 41
. . . .....
42 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUMING 1,2M,W0 376,000 258,000 44,W0 49,000 1,510,000 W,000 1,A5,000 43
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............. ............. ...........
EXPENDHl T
46 0 MrPEtPaM�tu& Interest n26.000 313,000 EAA,000 16,000 16,000 I,R1,000 ]],OOD 1,S98,OOD 43
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............. ............. ...........
45 TOTAL WENDITURES B00,000 313,000 244,%0 16,000 16,OW 1,R1,000 n,0_oD I,3%,000 45
46 Reserves B Carry-Over to Next Year 348,000 63,000 I4,0GO 2B4O00 33,000 1W,000 21.000 I"'WO 46
47 Next Year's Dry Period FuMinB Recuirments ill MOO WONO 14,000 28,000 31,000 189,000 i1,000 1n,%0 <>
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............. ............. ...........
48 Furs] BBlerce or (Deficit) .......... ............ .as......0.. ...__...:. .........e.:. ......®:. 0 LB
SUMMARY (Adjusted for Inter-FUN Tramfers) z ��
50 RaTOTAL NEYWMrI[y War From Lest Year 106;51.= F36.0,000 151�SR,OD 339;1E1�W0 2222;992.00 1336;4066,wo 1 86;33w�WO 1,5925F4,0000 50
3.9...._.----
y5..}.�.xyy..... ........... ........... ........... ............. ............. ...........
51 IOIAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 207;666; #O 3TF;000 260;5ft;O0 07,U9;O0 229,6]T12;O0 1,246,01,0W 1,J2B.372,,00 2,5m�0W,000 52 52 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............. ............. ...........
53 Reserves S Cerry-Over to Next Year Ill 215,am 256,]L9,000 146,]0,000 248,51,000 301,E OOD 301,BIG MO 276,625,000 276,181,000 53
54 Next Years Dry Period FUndi, Requirecents 25,6&,000 36,869,000 48,718,000 51,667,000 64, ;000 64:692,00() 101,W6,000 101,382,000 54
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............. ............. ...........
55 FUND BALANCE OR (DEFICIT) •.eu9::OOv 219,BBO,DOOc 9i,W®.000_ 1%,89e6000- R],OW,000 23],i%,000 169,3 ,000_ 1y,3"'WO 55
• IRW Feesy s nteci en IFft 3 of District No. 14 cash flea
•• IncllNes 1R0 Fees presented an lift 15 of District No. 14 case flax
The District 2 bonds were all retired in 1988-89 and a small surplus of
interest earnings was returned to the Capital Facilities Fund. The
financial position of District 3 has not significantly improved and the
allowable tax should be levied to fund debt service in 1989-90. District 7
has retired the 1951 issue and will retire the 1970 issue in August of 1989.
Remaining funds in the 1970 Bond Fund should be transferred to the 1962
Bond Fund in accordance with the original intent of the District 7 Board.
IMPACT OF GANN (PROPOSITION 4) SPENDING LIMITATION INITIATIVE
Proposition 4, the statewide initiative which was passed by the voters in 1979,
limits appropriations of state and local governments from tax sources to a
formula based on changes in population and the cost of living (Consumer Price
Index). If growth in per capita income is less than the increase in the CPI ,
then the formula is adjusted to reflect the lower of the two.
Staff has estimated the Districts' appropriation limits which will be presented as
a separate Agenda item and submitted to the Boards at the July 12, 1989 meeting
of the Joint Boards. Our preliminary calculations indicate that each District
is within its authorized limit as indicated in Table VI:
TABLE VI
1989-90 TAX APPROPRIATION BUDGET COMPARISON WITH GANN LIMITATIONS
1989-90 District Net 1989-90
District Tax Appropriations Budget Gann Limitation
1 $ -0- $ 2,192.000
2 601,000 8,153,000
3 2,729,000 10,763,000
5 1,203,000 2,077,000
6 -0- 1,287,000
7 1,669,000 3,050,000
11 348,000 2,209,000
13 No tax appropriation budget Not applicable
(District is 100% financed by fees)
14 No tax appropriation budget Not applicable
(District is 100% financed by fees)
SPECIFIC BUDGET ITEMS
Following is a brief discussion of the major elements of the budgets:
CARRY-OVER AND REEVES: The appropriated reserves and carry-over consist
primarily of acEScumulated construction reserves for financing new facilities to
serve our service area needs and improved treatment facilities mandated by
-8-
federal law and the master planned trunk sewer systems of the individual
Districts. Also included are operating fund contingency reserves and authorized
general reserves for the tax revenue cash flow dry period.
REVENUE
Taxes: Tax revenue is split into two accounts:
Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation
of the Digits' pro rata share of the maximum 1% basic property tax
allowed under Proposition 13. The Districts average approximately 3%
($.03 for each $1.00) of the basic levy. Districts 13 and 14 receive
no tax allocation.
Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make
voter-approved outstanding general obligation bond principal and
interest payments. Under Jarvis-Gann, tax levies to satisfy these
obligations are not restricted.
Federal/State Construction Grants: In the past, EPA and SWRCB have funded
Up to 87K of treatment plant construction for certain approved projects.
Estimates reflect anticipated payments based on grant funding of those
previously approved and completed projects which are currently completing
the EPA audit appeal process.
Fees: All Districts have an adopted sewer connection fee schedule. This
category also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by all nine
Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the
Revenue Program, and the user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5,
6, 11 and 13. Annexation fee revenue is indeterminable and, thus, not
generally included in the estimates unless there is an existing agreement
providing for payment of fees.
Sale of Capacity Rights: This account records income from sale of capacity
rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the capital replacement
charge. SAWPA is considering purchase of an additional 2 MGD In 19B9-90
and 5 MGD in 1992-93 under their existing agreement, and these revenues are
included in the 10-year estimates.
Interest 8 Miscellaneous Income: Consists primarily of interest income
from investment of accumulated construction reserves and other
miscellaneous items.
Other Revenue: On the cash flow statements this account generally reflects
Inter-fund transfers. In District 5 it includes $4,650,000 in the capital
facilities fund over the next three years estimated to be received from
IRWD for construction of facilities to serve the Down Coast Area. Larger
amounts in future years' capital facilities funds are estimated debt issues
as recommended by the Master Plan Financial Plan. Any debt would be
approved by the Boards prior to issue. The potential Bolsa Chica annexation
to District 11 has been included in this category because of the
significance and special nature of the annexation.
EXPENDITURES: Other than reserve appropriations there are six major expenditure
components of the individual Districts' budgets, four of which have either
previously been acted upon or reviewed by the Boards, or established by
contractual obligations or outstanding general obligation bond indentures.
-9-
Joint Works Treatment Plant Construction Pro ram: Adoption of the Capital
Outlay Revolving Fund Budget RF, yellow Prop
the Joint Boards at their
regular June meeting established the requirements for this item, which
accounts for 32.5% of the 1989-90 budget. Included in the Capital
Facilities and Construction/COP Payment Fund budgets are appropriations for
the current year CORF budget and toward master-planned treatment plant
expansion costs that will total $753 million over the next ten years. Each
District's share is based on its respective equity percentage, which is
computed on a three-year average of sewage flow from each District.
This account includes any annual purchase of additional joint works equity
that might be required due to a change in a District's proportional equity
percentage. Districts Nos. 2, 6, 7, and 13 are required to purchase
additional equity In 1989-90. Unless otherwise noted, any such purchases
or sales have been adjusted out of the combined summaries and schedules.
District Collection System Consolidated Master Plan Construction Programs:
Requirements for this item are essentially established by the individua
Districts' adopted Master Plans of trunk sewers, but may be changed from
time to time at the option of the Boards. Sewer construction will total
$176 million during the next ten years.
Debt Retirement and Interest: These requirements are fixed by the
indentures of the respect ve general obligation bond issues. (See comments
above under Tax Levy re 1989-90 funding.) COP debt repayment in Districts
1, 2 and 3 is included in their respective construction funds.
Joint Operating Expenses: Requirements for this item were also established
In June by adoption of the Joint Operating Budget (green). Individual
Districts' shares of this cost are based on their proportionate gallonage
flow for the 1989-90 fiscal year.
Reimbursement A reement Pa ent: This account represents anticipated
payments based on connect on fees collected) against outstanding
reimbursement agreements where a developer has constructed a master plan
sewer or advanced connection fees for such construction. District 5
currently has one suchagreement for the oversizing of the Bayside Drive
Sewer.
District Maintenance 0 eratin 8 Other Expenditures: This item establishes
requ remen s for main enance and operation of the individual District's
sewer collection systems and also provides for each District's general
business activity. It also includes any other miscellaneous costs or
transfers not included in one of the above items.
FUNDS
Following are comments regarding the several funds of each District's recommended
budget.
OPERATING FUNDS: The major item in the Operating Fund is the share of the Joint
Operating t (green) which was adopted by the Boards in June. The remaining
budget accounts are primarily for maintenance and/or repair of the Districts'
collection system and for the incidental operating expenses which the Districts
will incur. All of the Districts have been in the midst of major trunk sewer
expansion and rehabilitation programs for the past several years. As a result,
budgetary requirements for sewer line and pump station maintenance reflect
-10-
increases for maintenance of these facilities, increasing energy costs and
extraordinary repairs to manholes and sewers. Industrial monitoring costs which
reflect the expense of enforcing the uniform use ordinance and EPA's
pretreatment standards which became effective on April 27, 1984, are continuing
to rise.
Following are further comments on the Operating Fund line item accounts:
Directors' Fees: Provides for regular meetings and allows for compensation
in accordance with the fee schedule adopted by the respective Boards.
Share of Joint 0 era tin : Represents each District's share of operating,
ma n aiming, and administering joint works treatment and disposal
facilities, and is allocated based on gallonage flow of each District.
Amounts were established by adoption of the Joint Operating Budget in June.
Trunk Maintenance: Provides for maintenance of each District's collection
sys em— of trunk The several Districts presently have approximately
850 miles of trunk and sub-trunk sewers ranging in size up to 96 inches, as
well as several hundred miles of small local sewers in District No. 7
serving two cities and various unincorporated areas.
Manhole and Line Repairs: Provides for major contractual repairs to the
Districts' manholes and trunk sewers or pump station wet wells which have
deteriorated because of corrosion.
Pump Station Maintenance: Provides for maintenance of District's pump and
lift stations. Districts which have collection systems that cannot flow to
the treatment sites by gravity (particularly coastal Districts 5, 6 and 11
as well as District 7) have one or more stations. Therefore, the costs
among the Districts vary considerably based upon the number of pumping
facilities.
Permit and Industrial Waste Administration: Provides for the Industrial
Waste Division's administration and enforcement of the Uniform Connection
and Use Ordinance. Requirements mandated by State and Federal regulatory
agencies have caused this item to increase substantially over the past few
years.
Inter-District Sewer Use Char e: Provides for payment for inter-district
flows between certain Districts pursuant to basic accommodation agreements
between those Districts.
Bond Collection Expense: Several of the Districts' bond issues provide for
coupon redemption by the Bank of America which charges the Districts for
said services (with the exception of District No. 11).
Tax/Fee Collection Expense: The County charges a tax and supplemental user
fee collection expense on all funds except bond interest and sinking funds.
Treasurer's Investment Administration and Banking Fee: Fees charged the
Districts by the Orange County Treasurer for placing specific investments
of Districts' funds and handling commingled investments.
-11-
Utilities: Major item in this account is for power supplied to the
istricts' pump stations. Also includes telemetering on leased lines to
the control center at Plant No. 1, and water supply where needed at the
pumping station sites. Appropriations are increasing to reflect rising
energy and water rates.
User Fee Expense: Fees charged by the Orange County Assessor for data base
use and by the County Data Center to process supplemental user fee
programs.
Professional Services: Appropriates funds for minor engineering, legal and
special consulting work for which the need arises from time to time in the
Districts. A significant rate increase is proposed for next year by the
Assessor's Office.
Printin and Publication: This account provides necessary funds for
pub isi ng ac ons an regulations of the Boards as well as the Districts'
annual user fee report to the EPA and SWRCB.
Meetin and Travel • Directors' Mile e: Provides for reimbursement to
Directors for transpor at ion to Board meetings and other functions.
Uncollectibie Accounts: For bad debts related to the collection of
industria user charges.
Interest Ex ense: For interest on purchase of joint works equity or on
outsta�bursement agreements, where applicable.
Prior Year's Ex ense: Represents adjustments to an account balance for the
previous years .
Transfers: Usually reflects inter-fund transfers to complete previous
accounting transactions or to provide necessary supplemental funding.
Similar reciprocal transactions may appear in other funds.
BOND FUNDS: Budget requirements for the Bond Funds are determined by the
Indenture of each issue and are established eachyear in accordance with legal
requirements. (See comments above under Tax Levy and Debt Retirement and
Interest re 1989-90 funding.)
CAPITAL FACILITIES FUND: Generally, the major item in the Capital Facilities
Fund is the individual District's respective share of the Capital Outlay
Revolving Fund Budget (yellow) for joint treatment works expansion, which was
adopted by the Boards at the June meeting. In addition, the Districts also have
a Master Plan sewer construction program in progress for which specific budget
appropriations have been recommended for contracts presently under way or
planned in the near future. Other line items in this fund are primarily for
accumulated reserves for future construction in accordance with the Districts'
sewer and joint works master plans and federal and state requirements, and
purchase and sale of equity in jointly-owned treatment works as provided for in
the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement.
CONSTRUCTION/COP PAYMENT FUNDS: Districts 1, 2 and 3 issued Certificates of
Participation P's in August, 1986 to pay for their respective shares of the
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) for joint treatment works facilities for a
three-year period (through 1988-89). The major items in these funds are each
-12-
District's CORF construction payment share for those original projects not
completed by June 30, 1989, and the installment payments due on the COP's.
Revenues are transferred into these funds from the three Districts' Capital
Facilities funds to make the installment payments as the COP proceeds and
interest earned on the proceeds are used for CORF construction.
If Directors have any questions regarding the budget material , please contact
Wayne Sylvester or Gary Streed.
-13-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
P1y1TATjo V
zo4olitan Or �v
Vd91 T•f+I
0
p Smce 1954 .�
�'INGE COUNA
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Page 1
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT N1 SUMMARY
................... . I ----------- I ___________ I ________---
I I
I APPROVED I APPROVED I RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET BUDGET I BUDGET
1987-M 1988-89 I 1989-90
_______________________________________ I ----------- ----------- -----------
REQUIREMENTS I I
....________ I
I
operating 8 Capital Requirements I
--------------------------------
I
operadnB Furl I 6,683,000 I 7,72e,000 I 9,123,000 I
I
cQnstrua;0n Fwtd 15,074,000 I 12,168,000 I 7,082,000 I
I
Capital Facilities Funtl I 11,424,000
---------- *I ---------- •I ----------
SUB-TOTAL OPERATING 8 CAPITAL 132,339,000 130,881,000 127,629,000
----------- I ----------- I ___--_____-
I I
Debt Retirement I I I
I I I
Bontl and Interest Fund - 1951 I 71,000
------- ------- I ------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 132,497,450 31,025,000 127,700,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Page 2
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT 01 SUMMARY
....................................... I ........... I ........... I ...........
I I I I
I APPROVED I APPROVED I RECOMMENDED I
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET I BUDGET
1987-88 I I M-89 I I M-90 I
....................................... I ........... I ----------- I ...........
FUNDING I I I I
I I I I
.........ting d Capital Funding I I I I
I I I I
Cash 8 Irnastmants (Appropriated I I I
Reserves and CsPry-Over) 124,666,000 123,648,000 17,204,000
I I I
Other Revenue I 5,999,000 •I 5,479,000 • 8,501,000 •I
I I I I
Anticipated Tex Allocation I I I I
From 1% Levy I 1,674,000 I 1,754,000 1,924,000 I
........... I ----------- ----------- I
SUB-TOTAL OPERATING 8 CAPITAL 132,339,000 130,881,000 27,629,000
........... I ........... ...........
I I I I
Debt Retirement I I
I I I
Cash 8 Imastmen[a (Appropriated I I I I
Reserves 8 Carry-Over) I 93,450 I 83,000 I 52,000
I I I I
Other Revenue I 8,000 I 7,000 I I
I I I I
Amount Raised by sexes for
Debt Obligation I 57,000 I 54,000 19,000
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I
SUBTOTAL DEBT RETIREMENT I 158,450 I 1",000 I 71,000
........... I ........... I ----------- I
TOTAL FUNDING 132,497,450 131,025,000 127,700,000
........... I ........... ...........
-Adjusted for Inter-Fund Transfers
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 P.O. I
BUT GET RECOMMENDATIONS DM89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND #1 OPERATING
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
TED
APPROVED i ESQ
APPROVED ' I RECOMMENDED
ACCOIRI DESCRIPTION OR T TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGETI EXPENDITURE I I BUDGET
------- I 1988-E9 I 1988-� I I 1989 90
! i ----------- i ----------- i ----------- -----------
OPERATING
Directors' Fees j 8,200 j 8,000 j 8,100 j j 12,000
Contractual Services I I I I
Share of Joint Operating 3,630,000 I 4,223,000 I 3,595,000 I 4,092,000
Trunk Maintenaxe 30,400 I 30,800 I 6,400 I I 31,000
Manhole Lire and Net Well Repairs 17,500 I 17.500 I I I 17,000
Permit and Ind.Naste Adair. I 170,000 I 190,000 I 192,200 I I 2QU,000
Connection Fee Admin. I 17,400 I 25.000 I 31,600 I I 78,000
Bond Collection Expense I 200 I 200 I I I 200
Tax/Fee Collection Expense I 8,000 I 10,500 I 11,000 I I 12,000
Treasurer's Imestment Adm. I I I I I
A Banking Fees i 10,000 i 10,000 i 9,900 i i 15,0QU
User Fee Expense I 13,000 I 15,000 I 14,100 I I 72,000
-Professional Services I 17,000 I 10,000 I 100 I I 5,800
Printing And Pubtication j 5,000 j 1,500 j 900 j j 1.500
I I I I I
Travel 8 Meeting • Directors I 300 I 500 I 300 I I 500
Uxol Leetilate Accounts j 1,000 j I,Dw j 3,200 j j 1,000
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ( -----------
TOTAL OPERATING I 3,928,000 I 4,543,000 I 3,872,800 I I 4.538,000
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I -----------
(ION-OPERATING I I I I I
-------------
I I I I I
interest I I I 5,500
Expenses Applicable to Prior Years I 3,DQU I 3,OOD I 2,200 I I 3,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ( -----------
TOTAL NON-OPERATING I 3,000 I 3,000 I 7,700 I I 3,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I -----------
TOTAL OPERATING A MON-OPERATING I 3,931,000 I 4,546,000 I 3,880,500 I I 4,541,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I ---.-..._._
RESERVES I I I I I
Appropriation for Contingencies I 786,000 I 909,000 I I I 2,311,000
Authorized General Reserve I 1,966,000 I 2,273,000 I I I 2.271,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I --- ..-----
TOTAL RESERVES I 2,752,000 I 3,182,000 I 0 1 I 4,582,000
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I --._....---
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS I 6,683.000 I 7,728,000 I 3,880,500 I I 9.123.000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.1 Page 2
BUDGET RECOMENDATI ONG 6/9/89
1989.90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND #1 OPERATING
-----------------------------••-------- I ----------- I ----------- ........... I ----------- I -----------
ESTIMATED I
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL I RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOINT TITLE BUDGET I BUDGET I EXPENDITURE I I BUDGET
- - ----------- i ----------- i -.-----
AVAILABLE FUNDING
Cash 8 Imesta Hits
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-Ovar) I 3,087,000 I 3,657,000 I 3,153,000 I I 3,213,000
I •---------- I ----------- I ----------- I I •----------
Fees I 308,000 I 385,000 462,100 I I 508,000
Supplemental User Fees I 1,362,ODO I 1,635,000 I 1,835,400 3,202,000
I I I I I
Interest & Misc. Receipts I 207,000 I 242,000 I 334,800 I I 276,000
I I I I I
Delinquent Tases I 45,D00 .------ I ------ I ------ I I .. ...
SUB-TOTAL I 1,922,000 I 2,317,000 I 2,702,500 I I' 4,067,000
I ----------- I ----------- I ........... I I •----------
Tao Allocation j 1,418,000 j 1,474,000 j 1,393,500 j I 1,502,000
I I I I I
Redevelopment Agency Pass-through I 235,000 241,000 I 302,900 I I 309,000
Subventions I 21,000 I 39,000 I 36,00o I I 32,000
----------- I ----------- I •---------- I I -----------
SUB-TOTAL I 1,674,000 I 1.754,000 I 1,732,400 I I 1,843,000
•---------- I ----------- I •---------- I I -----------
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 6,683,000 I 7,728,000 I 7,587,900 I I 9,123,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 6/27/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 01 CAPITAL FACILITIES
....................................... ........ I ----------- ----------- I ----------- ...........
ESTIMATED I _---_
APPROVED I APPROVED ACTUAL I RfC NDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET I BUDGET I EXPENDITURE I I MMT
1g87-88 I 1988-89 I 1988-89 I I 1989-90
....................................... I ...._______ ..._______ i ----------- i ----------- i ----.----__
PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES
__________________ __ I I
Trestoent Plant Facilttiea I I I I 5,983,000
Appropriation for Master-Planned
I
TreatsMnt Plant Facilities j 8,672,000 j 7,835,000 I i i 3,220,000
Master Plan/EIR Update I 55,000 55,000 II I I
Santa Ana/Oyer Road Trunk Serer
I I I I
Rehabilitation, 1.15R I 128,000
Earthquake/Flood Damage Reserve I 311,000 I 415,000 I I I 521,000
I I I I I
Appropriation for District Facilities, I I
Isprovements and Expansion I 1,416,000 I 2,680,00) I I I 1,700,000
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I -----------
SUB-TOTAL 110,582,oOU I to,989,OUO I 0 1 111,424,000
I ----------- I ........... I ----------- I I -----------
Transfer to Construction Fund I I 723,000 I 2,060.200 I I 1,412,000
I ........... I ----------- I --......... I I ---------
COP Payment Transfer to Cart. Furd I 2,126,000 I 2,309,000 I 2,309,000 I I 2,341,000
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ( -----------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 112,708,000 114,017,000 I 4,369,200 I 115,177,000
AVAILABLE FUNDING
_________________ I I I I I
Cash A Immstmeets I I I I I
(Appropriated Reserves and I I I I I
Carry-over) I 9,391,000 111,139,000 111,533,700 I 110,916,00o
I ........... I ........... I ----------- I I -----------
Construction Grants I 759,000 I 285,000 I 7,200 I I 287,000
Connection Fees I 348,000 I 500,000 I 632,000 I I 1,561,000
Irwatrial Waste Fees j 112,000 j 109,000 j 130,000 j j 143,000
Supplemental Fees I 394,000 559,000. I 612,000
Sale of Capacity Rights I 450,000 I 492,000 I 7,300 I I 489,000
Joint Works Equity Sale I 650,000 I 124,000 I 71,500 I I 1,350,000
Interest and Misc. Receipts I 614,000 I 8091000 I 1,148,000 I I 431,000
I I I I I
SUB-TOTAL I 3,317,000 I 2,878,000 I 2,608,000 I I 4,261,000
I ----------- I ........... I ----------- I I -----------
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 112,708,000 114,017,000 114,141,7OU I I I5,177,000
.a.....,... I ........... I ........... I I ...........
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MO. 1 6/19/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND #1 CONSTRUCTION/COP PAYMENT
_______________________________________ I ----------- I ----------- ----------- I ----------- I -----------
EST[MATED I I
APPROVED I APPROVED I ACTUAL I I RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET I EXPENDITURE I I BUDGET
I 1987-88 I 1988-89 I 1988-89 I I 1989-90
_______________________________________ I ----------- ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ____--___--
PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES I I I I
_________________________
Treatment Plant Expansion 5,979,000 I 9.859,000 I 6,344,200 I 4,741,000
I I I I I
Appropriation for Master-Planned I I I I I
Treatment Plant Facilities I 6,%9,000 I I I I
I I I I I
SUB-TOTAL 112,948,000 I 9,859,000 6,344,200 I I 4,741,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I -----------
COP Installment Payments 2,126,000 I 2,309,000 I 2,2% 000 I I 2,341,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ( --_--------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 115,074,000 112,168,000 I 8,638,200 I I 7,082,000
I I I I I
AVAILABLE FUNDING I I I I I
Cash and Investments I I I I
(Appropriated Reserves and I I I
Carry-aver) 12,188,000 I 8,852,000 8,722,000 I I 3,075,000
-----------
I I _----.----_
Interest 8 Misc. Receipts I 760,000 284,000 I 760,000 I I 254,000
Transfer from Capital Fund I I 723,000 I 2,060,200 I I 1,412,000
I I I
SUB-TOTAL I 760,000 I 1,007,000 I 2,820,200 I 1,666,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I _----_-----
TRANSFER FOR INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS I I I I
-
---------------------------------
I I I I
COP Payment Transfer fron Capital Fund I 2,126,000 2,309,000 I 2,3D9,ODO I 2,341,000
----------- I ___________ I ----------- I _._-_----__
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 115,074,000 112,168,000 I 13,851,200 I 7,082,000
I ........... I __=czc I ........... I I ........
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 6/27/89
BUDGET RECWMENDA71US
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 01 BOND AND INTEREST - 1951
--------------- ----------------------- I ----------- I ----------- ----------- I ----------- I -----------
ESTIMATED
APPROVED I APPROVE ACTUAL I I RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET EXPENDITURE I I BUDGET
1987-88 I 1988.89 1988-89 I I 1989-90
---------------•----------------------- I ----------- I ----------- ----------- ----------- I -----------
NO RETIREMENT AND INTEREST I I I
---------------------------- I I I I
Prinaipat on Bonds I 70,000 I 70,000 i 70,000 i i 70,000
I
Interest an Bonds I 875
..... I ----- I ..... I I ---
TOTAL I 74,375 I 72,625 I 72,625 I I 70,875
AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE I 84,075 I 71,375 I e I I
I ----------- I ----------- I I ( -----------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS I 158,450 I 1"'GOO I I I 70,875
AVAILABLE FUNDING I I I I I
-
Cash & Investarents I I I I
(Appropriated Reserves and I I I I I
Carry-over) I 93,450 I 83,000 I 84,640 I I 52,000
I --•-------- I ----------• I -----•----- I I -----------
I I I I I
Delinquent Tams I 2,000 I '2,000 I 4,263 I I 7,000
Interest & Misc. Receipts I 6,000 I 5,G00 I 3,345 I I
I ----------- I -------`--- I ----------- I I -----------
SUB-TOTAL I 8,000 I 7,000 I 7,608 I I 1,0E
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ( ------ ----
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES I 57,000 54,000 I 51,273 I I 17,875
I ----------- ----------- I ----------- I ( -----------
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING I 158,450 144,000 I 143,521 I I 70,575
Outstanding G.O. Bands 8 6/30/89: $70,000
Final Payment Date: August, 1989
CQWn M17ATIM 01011110 R0.1 6y1/09
SCIEDOLE OF DISTRICT (OLLECTIOR SYSIM PRGJECTS
PROJECT TOTAL C.". 1909-90 1990-91 1991-92 I992." 1995-% 5-Taar Total I99L-99 10-Year Total
........... .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ............ ........... .............
Dyer load Marbole Rebabil Ration (a) 100,000 IN,= IN,= 120,000
Main-Oyer McMole RMabilitatim la) I00,000 0 100,000 IN.=
Greemi lle-Sullivan MaMo1e Rehabilitation (a) 170,00D 0 Imle00 170,000
Reitz Street Manhole Rehebittatim (a) 210,000 0 210,000 210.000
Mtacellaneaaa (a) 1,000,mil 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Soo,= 500,000 1,OOa,"It
.......... ........... .......... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ...........
ImAL I,7oo,000 o IOD,000 t0o,aoo too,Doo za0,000 1oo,a90 aeo,a0o I,wD,a9D t,)oo,000
(J Fully Pvtleal
(b) Partially Fm
it) Not {Valid
COUNTY UNIIA71M DISTRICT 0.1 6/19/89
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED MR FLa Pepe I
FISCAL YEARS 1989-90 TNRgWN 1998-99
LINE 1989-90 19%-91 1991.92 1992-93 1993-94 5-Year Total 1994-99 ID-Year TOaL LINE
.... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... -....__-_... -_......... ............. ....
OPERATING iWOf i45.a fSB.OD ST6.00 BLOOM $130.00 f205.0
______________ __..... ....... ....... ....... ------- ...........
1 Reserves A Carry-Over From Last Year 3,213,000) 4,588,ao 4,a1,0a 4,111,00 5,296,000 3,213,000 6,091,ao 3,213,000 1
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ---I....... ........... ...........
REVENUE
2 -Mare of 13 Tax Allocation 11924,NO 2,059'am 2,205,CD0 2,362,a0 2,532,000 11,%2,a0 16,638,000 27,720,000 2
3 Fees: Industrial Nate 5%,ODD 5B<,a0 6T2,0a TTS,aO FIS8,000 1.425,000 6,B89,ao 10,314,00D 3
4 8�pplagntet user 3,202,Oa 4,16T,000 5,512,000 T,322,Oa 9,Am 29,812,000 66,591,ao %,403,000 4
5 Interest B MiscelL... Ircme 276,0% 333,000 316,000 333,0% 42B4ODO 1,686,%0 5,260,000 t,9K,000 5
6 Other Reveme D D 6
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
T TOTAL REVENUE 5,910,am 7.143.00 B,TOS,m 10,2%,Ga 13,4571000 46,005,000 95,3m,a0 139,]83,000 T
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
8 70TAL AVAILABLE FUMY INC 9,123,a0 11,T65,= 13,SW,aO 14,901,Oa 18,T53,Oa 49,20,000 ta,169,ao 142,596,000 B
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
EVER17MES
9 Sbre 0f Joint worts M B 0 4,092,000 4,691,60D 5,371,000 5,547,000 6,360,000 %,a8,0a 46,867,000 74,93S,0DD 9
TD Collation SYRIAN M A 0 Rol Other Gen. K9,o% 482,00D 518,000 558,a0 B02,no 2,6a,0a 3,835,000 6,K4,Oa f0
11 Other Eapertltnura 1,150,000 3,Sa,Oa 3,500,00 S,OOD,Oa 13,25ga0 33,250,000 Q,000,000 11
........... ........... ...5fia'a -_ •_--------- ..._....... ....._..._. .3,05,..__ ......... .
12 TOTAL EAPERDITUREs f,541,Oa 6,923,a0 9,]%,Oa 9,605,Oa 11,962,Oa 4$,42T,a0 85,952,a0 128,3]9,OOo IT
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
13 Averse. A Carry-over to Neat Year 4,SAFE,am 4,Ba,0o0 4,111,a0 5,2%,Oa 6,991,a0 6,T91,aD tf,21 T,aD 14,217,000 13
14 Neat Year's Dry Period Turtling Requirements 2,2T1,000 3,462,a0 4 BILL NO 4 DGY'PoO 5,%1,a0 S,Poi3OW 10,382,000 10,362,0111) 14
15 iW Bslgge or (Deficit) 2,311,a0 1,3t0,a0 t58T,0aJ <%,a0 810,oa 810,a0 3,835,000 ........ 15
CAPITAL )
------
2,010'
16 Reserves 6 Carry-aver Frem Last Year ......,0a ......a0 •20,9%,a0 ....I,ao ......aO .......... .......... 13,9%,0a 16
REVENUE
17 Cshatru d. Glenna 287,Oa 28T,0100) 28T,000 17
1B Fast: COtmectim 1,56T:0a 1,05,a0 1,T14,a0 1,M,ea 1,387,00 B,Sa,aO 10,966,a0 19,556,000 18
19 Iaatrial west. 1f1,0DO 1K,Oa 189,a0 2V,0m 250,a0 963,a0 1,939,000 2,%2,000 19
20 SumLeoNntal user 0 D 2n
21 sate of Ceacity Rights 489,0a 240,ao 44,a0 1,696,oa 4T5,a0 2,9A4,a0 56D,00o 3,5%,000 21
22 Interest A III...Lt... 1. 685,Oa 03,000 1,%B,aO 3R,a0 %0,a0 3,%t,a0 6,405,a0 10.:;LB coo 22
23 Other Imea 1,350,a0 35,0a,a0 30,Oa,ON 66,150,0100 15,000,0130 81.350,00 23
........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ...........
24 TOTAL REVENUE <,S15,Oa ST,9R,a0 2,9%,a0 4,081,000 33,512,000 83,UTS,wo 34,87D,a0 117,%5,a0 a
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
25 TOTAL AVAILABLE I=ING 1B,5%,Oa 43,313,00 23,985,000 12,652,000 35,522,000 97,066,Oa 58,262,ao 131,9116,000 25
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
EXK41TWES
26 Share 0f Jolnt Ports lrotemrrt Plant 10,TE4,0a 14,%1,a0 13,015,aO 8,099,010 5,768,000 52,507,00 26,107,000 78,614,0011 26
27 District Collection system Ta,00D la,ao 1a,= %0,= TaD,000 660,Da 1,040,ao 1,700,00D 27
28 CO Payments, 2,14T,0a 2,]22,ao 2,2%,a0 2,2BS,a0 2,162,000 11,SOT,Ua 10,993,00 22,500,00D 28
29 Other EspeMtlures S,Oa,aO 4,ao,ON 9,0a,0a 2,250,000 11,250,00D 29
........... ..........: ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
30 TOTAL EXPENDIIDRES 13,165,Oa 22,323,a0 I5,<1f,a0 1QK=,00D 12,13D,Oa 33,674,000 401393,00D 1K,ON,O o 30
........... ........... ---I....... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
31 Raerves 9 Carry-wer to Nest Year ==5,]41,a0 2Q9%,Oa= = 8=,5T,,ow ........2,010,Oar 23,39Y,a0 23:]92M 1T,BT2,a0 1T,BT2,000 31
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 40.1 6/19/B9
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED GSN FLOW Page 2
FISCAL YEARS 1909-90 THROUGH 19 99
LIKE 1m." 1990.91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-9f S-Year ..... 9........... ............. ....
BYRD MRIS)
32 e
.R....u......rvea 8.Grry-War Trace Les[ Year .52,m..... 0 0 0 0 52,OU0 0 ...— 32
lEVE44E
33 OR LeW 19,W0 19,000 19,000 33
34 Interest a xiuel ler,e9us trusts0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3f
35 Other 1.. 0 D 35
36 TOTAL REVERRE 19,000 0 0 0 0 19,000 0 19,000 36
37 TOiPL AVAILABLE FU101NG ]1,--- 0 0 D 0 T1,W0 B ]1,000 37
EXPENDITURES
SIT ORtl Princilrl 4 Interest Tf.w ]I," ]1,0OU 30
39 Other Esperdi4ves 39
40 TOTAL EXPEIRITIIRES T1,000 0 0 0 0 71,090 0 ]1,OOD 40
Reserves
41 L Carry-Ores LO Neat Year 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0
42 Meat Year's Dry Peri90 FmNirq RaNi remenn 42 D 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 42
43 Fw0 Be Lorca or (Deficit) 0 0 . 0= 0 Oa 0 . .......0. ..........0 43
44 Reserves L Carry-War I.Last Year 1T,2%,000 9,923,000 25,D92,OU0 12.ONCE No ],306,000 17,256,000 3D,lW,00D 17,256,000 44
45 T01A1 REVERE 10,444,000 45,115,000 11,]00,000 14,6T1,000 f6,969,05 129,099,0OU 128,246,000) 257,341,000 45
46 TOTAL PENIITURE FINDING !],]U0,000 55,05,000 3T,492,000 2],553,000 54,2]5,000 146,155,000 150,431,m 2f4,603,000 46
GT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1T,TT/,OOU ---------- -------0OU .......... .......... 1----------ln.wo 12......0W ----------- 47
_______on .._-...CH-_ .7...6,00"1 ._......... ....__.___- ._......... .32 immi....
40 Reserves 6 carry-Over to Near Year 9,923,W0 25,T92,0DO 12,602,OU0 ].306,DOU 5'"i3OU0 5,103,000 32,099,000 32,009,0OU 40
49 Next Year's Dry Pari96 fmgirg Regli rements 2,2]1,000 S,f62,OW 4,6Po,0OU ......... .........i'm --- ..... . ........ tO,SR,000 49
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
50 FUND BFLP11[E OR (DFfltli) ],652,000 22,35,000 1,984,000 2,503,0OU 24,202,000 24,202,0OU 21,10),DOU 21,TIY],000 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
f� A� y0"oP°litan ��.
o �d
I K
Since is54
GE
I Colo
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Page 1
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT p2 SUMMARY
I I I
I APPROVED I APPROVED 1RECOMMENDED 1
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET I BUDGET BUDGET 1
1987-88 1 1988-89 1989-90
--------- I ----------- I ----------- -----------REQUIR I
I I
- EMENTS
-----
I I
operating 8 Capital Requirements I I I
--------------------------------
I I I
operati na FDw 1 21,743,000 1 24,522,000 I zc,aze,000 1
I I I
Construction land 1 37,317,000 1 31,49s,000 117,268,oo0 1
I
Capi[al Facilities fund 1 48,417,000
---------- • ---------- 'I ----------
SU3-TOTAL OPERATING & CAPITAL 1128,891,000 1114,349,000 1 90,513,000 I
----------- ----------- 1 -----------
Debt Retirement I
---------------
I
Bond antl Interest Fuld - 1951 95,080 46,250 •1
Bond and Interest Funtl - 1958 411,756
------- ------- •I
SUB-TOTAL RETIREMENT 856,767 458,006 1 0
----------- ----------- 1 ---------.-
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 1129,747,767 1114,807,006 190,513,000 I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Page 2
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT N2 SUMMARY
_______________________________________ I ----------- 1 ----------- 1 ....._._.._ 1
I I I
I APPROVED I APPROVED I RECOMMENDED 1
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET I BUDGET 1
1 1987-88 1 1988-89 1 1989-90
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- 1 ....._----- I
FUNDING I I I
------- I I I I
Operating & Capital Funding I I
..................... .... I I I
I I I I
Cash B Investments (Appropriated I I I I
Reserves and Carry-over) 1107,956,000 1 94,478,000 1 69,153,000 I
I I I I
Other Revenue 1 13,644,000 •1 12,687,000 •1 13,412,000 •1
I I I I
Anticipated Tax Allocation I I I I
Fran 1% Levy 1 7,291,OD0 1 7,174,000 1 7,%3,000 1
1 ----------- 1 ----------- I -----------
SUB-TOTAL OPERATING & CAPITAL 1128,891,000 1114,339,000 1 90,513,000 1
1 ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I
I I I I
Debt Retirement I I I I
I I I
[ash 8 Investments (Appropriated I I I
Reserves & Carry-Over) 1 811,767 I 444,087 I I
I I I
Other peverue 45,000 1 13,924 I I
I I I
Amount Raised by Taxes for I I I I
Debt Obligation I I I
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I
SUB-TOTAL DEBT RETIREMENT 1 856,767 1 458,006 1 0 1
I ----------- I ----------- I ----.------ 1
TOTAL FUNDING 1129.747,767 1114,797,006 1 90,513,000 1
'Adjusted for Inter-fund Transfers
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 Page 1
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND #2 OPERATING
--------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- I -----------
EST]HATED
A APPROVED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE A:
D UDGET I BUDGET I E%PE TITURE RECOMMENDED
....................................... 1987-88 1988-09 1988.89 1989-90
OPERATING
Directors' Fen 19,000 15,000 10,900 13,000
Contractual Services
Share of Joint Operating 10,376,000 11,468,000 10,840,000 14,232,000
Trunk Maintenance 152,000 196,000 %,200 I 1%,000
Pump Station Maintenance 115,000 115,000 83,200 115,000
Manhole Repair 15,000 25,DO0 800 25,000
Permit and Ind. Neste Adni n. I 300,000 295,000 I 369,500 370,000
Connection Fee Admin. 43,000 43,OD0 60,700 245,500
Inter-Dist. Sewer Use Charge 2,D00 2,000 1,800 2,000
Bond Collection Expense I 1,000 1,000 I 400 1,000
Tax Collection Expense 19,000 22,000 17,000 19,800
Treasurer's Investment Ada.
6 Banking Fees 55,000 65,000 I 52,100 I I 55,200
Utilities 60,000 54,000 43,300 54,000
User Fee Expense I 48,300 I 18,000
Professional Services I 20,000 10,000 I 23,700 i i 15,000
Printing And Publication z,000 1,000 700 1,000
Travel Sr Meeting - Directors 2,000 ' 2,000 I 600 I I 1,500
uneollectible Accounts 2,000 2,000 --- .2,000
....
TOTAL OPERATING 11,183,000 12,316,000 11,649,500 15,366,000
NOW-OPERATING
.............
Interest 72,000 I I 45,0DO
Expenses Applicable to Prior Tears 1,D00 1,000 6,000 1,000
.--..---. . ..... ........ ....... -..........
TOTAL NON-OPERATING 73,000 1,000 ----- ......
TOTAL OPERATING 8 NON-OPERATING 111,256,000- 12.317,000 11,655�500 I 115,412,000
RESERVES
Appropriation for Contingencies 4,859,000 6,D46,000 i I 1,710,000
Authorized General Reserve 5,628,000 6,159,000 7,706,000
...........
I ........... I ...........
TOTAL RESERVES 10,487,000 12,205,000 0 9,416,000
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 21,743,000 124,522,000 111,655,500 124,828,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 Pege 2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/22/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND #2 OPERATING
--------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- _
ESTIMA ..____..-.. i .....___...
TED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTWL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE aUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
90
--------------------------------------- I _1987-88 I ---------. 1988-89 I .--.____..- -----:-
.......... I
AVAILABLE FUNDING
-----------------
Cash 8 Investments
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-Over) 11,787,000 113,630,000 11,862,800- 9,366,000"......... .......... I -......-"- ...... ----
Fees 1,650,000. .2,543,000 2,145,500. 2,252,000
Interest 8 Misc. Receipts I 790,000 916,000 I 1,041,000 I 666,000
Delinquent Taxes 396,000
------0 ------- ------- .......
SUBTOTAL 2,665,000 3,715,000 3,504,400 3,314,000
-"-------- i ........... I ----------- i ---------
Tax Allocation 7,091,000 6,969,000 6,792,400 7,367,000
Redevelopment Agency Tax
Pass-Through 14,000 20,000 22,100 22,000
Subventions I 186,006 I 185,000 I 175,800 I 158,000
SUB-TOTAL 7,291,000 7,174,000 6,990,300 7,547,000
Transfer from Capital Fund 4,601,000
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 21,743,000 24,522,000 22,357,500 24,828,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.2 Pena 1
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FIlI1D 02 CAPITAL FACILITIES
--------------------------------------- •---------- ........... ----------- ----------- -----------
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90
--------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ........... ----------- -----------
PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES
-------------------------
Treatment Plant Expansion 16,494,000
Appropriation for Master-planned
Treatment Plant Facilities 40,835,000 35,950,000 4,321,000
Radio Linked Telemetry System 25,000 25,000
Santa Ana River Interceptor, 2-14R 400,000 81,000 i 450,000
Replace Fullerton-Brea Interceptor
Contract 2-25 6,500,000 1.000
Liability to Anaheim for So.
Santa Ana River Trunk 100,000 100,000 100,000
South River Trunk Extension 240,000
East Richfield Interceptor, 2-22 300,000 500,000 669,000 50,000
Newhope/Placentia Relief Sewers
1. South Anaheim Relief Sewer, 2-27 1,490,000 396,000 1,000,000
2. Katella Relief, 2-28 1,100,000 26,0OU 1.100,000
3. Orange wood Diversion, 2.29 1,200,000
Euclid Interceptor Sewer 19,010,000 5,200,000 2,034,000
1. Orangewood to Broadway, 2-26 50,000 3,200,000
2. Edinger to I.N.Fmon, 2.26.2 6,583,000 269,000 8,700,000
3. Broadway to Orangethorpe, 2-26-3 1,187,D00 535,000 8,000,000
4. Lmpnon to Oragewood, 2.26-1 3,100,000 3,042,000
North Branch of Rolling Hills
Subt run k Relief, 2.11-3 400,000 63,000 425,000
Batavia/Linsoln Trunk Relief 300,000
Joint Works Equity Purchase 964,000 524,000
Earthquake/Flood Damage Reserve 872,000 1,152,a00 1,438,000
Appropriation for District
Facilities Improvements and
Expansion 1,225,000 1,135,000 189,000 975,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
SUB-TOTAL 69,831,000 58,322,000 7,355,000 48,417,000
----------- ----------- ----------- .----..----
Transfer to Operating Fund 4.601.E
........... ........... ........... -----.-----
Transfer to Construction Fund 7,295,000 7,295,000 2,363,000
COP Payment Transfer to Const.Fund 3,813,000 4,141,000 7=827 000- I 4,198,000-
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 73,6K,WO69,758,000 22477,101 59,579,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 Page 2
BUDGET RECORIENDATIONS 6/19/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 02 CAPITAL FACILITIES
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
ESYIUATE I I
APPROVE I APPROVED I ACTUAL I I RECORENDE
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET I BUDGET EXPENDITURE I BUDGET
1987-88 I 1988-89 1988-89 I IM-90
--------------------------------------- -------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- 1 -----------
AVAILABLE FUNDING I I I I
--------------- I
Cash a InVestments I I I
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-over) 164,668,000 ' 61,427,000 60,912,700 I 149,653,000
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I -----------
Construction Grants I 2,126,000 I 790,000 I 19,700 I I 790,0D0
Carnecti on Fees j 850,000 j 850,000 j 1,214,000 j j 4,909,000
Intlustrial Neste Fees I 675,000 I 1,041,000 I 876,000 I 1 920,000
Sale of Capacity Rights I 1,260,000 I 1,365,000 I 79,800 I I 1,349,000
Joint works Equity Sate I I 307,000 I 707,000 I I
Interest and Nisc. Receipts I 4,065,000 I 3,919,000 I 5,418,000 I I 1,958,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I -- --------
SUB-TOTAL I 8,976,000 I 8,272,000 1 8,314,590 I 9,926,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
Transfer from 1951 Bond Fund I I 1,000 I 4,000 I
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
Transfer from 1958 Bond Fund I I 58,000 1 79,100 I
----------- I ----------- I ----------- ( -----------
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 1 73,644,000 169,758,000 169,310,300, 159,579,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 6/27/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989.90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND F2 CONSTRUCTION/COP PAYMENT
--------------------------------------- ----------- ---------• •---------- ----------' i .._-.-..-•-
ESTIWI7ED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET E%PENDITURE BUDGET
1909-90
-------- --- ------------
PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES
Treatment Plant E.pansian 16,750,000 127,354,000 17,428,400 I 13,070,000
Appropriation for Master-plamed
Treatment Plant Facilities 16,754,000
SUB-TOTAL 33,504,000 27,354,000 17,428,400 113,070,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
COP Installment Payments 3,813,000 4,141,000 4,115,400 4,198,000
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 37,317,000 131,495,000 121,543,800 I 17,2611,00D
.......... ........... .:......... � ...:::.....
AVAILABLE FUNDING
Cash and Investments
(Appropri ated Reserves and
Carry-over) 31,501,000 19,421,000 19,062,100 10,139,000
Transfer from Capital Facilities Fund 7,295,000 10,981,500 2,363,000
Interest 6 Misc. Receipts 2,003,000 638,000 1,448,800 568,000
........... ...........
SUR-TOTAL 2,003,000 7,933,000 12,430,300 2,931,000
........... . . ..-.....-.- .......----
TRANSFER FOR INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS
---------------------------------
COP Payment Transfer from Capital Fund 3,813,000 4,141,000 4,141,000 4,198,000
.......
•• ""----------- ------ - ...........
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 37,317,000 31,495,000 35,633,400 17,268,DD0
.......... .......... ........... I ..........
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 92 BOND AND INTEREST - 1951
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- 1 -----------
ESTIMATED I I
APPROVED I APPROVED I ACTUAL I I RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET BUDGET I EXPENDITURE I I BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 I 1988-89 I I 1989-90
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST I I I I I
---------------------------- I I I I I
Principal on Bonds I 45,000 I 45,000 I 45,000 I I
I I I I I
Interest on Balls I 1,688 I 563 I 563 I I
Transfer to Capital Facilities Fund I I 687 3,993
I I
TOTAL ----46,688 46,250 ----49,556 ---------0
AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE I 48,392 I I I I
I ----------- I ----------- I I I -----------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS I 95,080 I 46,250 I I I 0
AVAILABLE FUNDING I I I
................. I I I I
Cash 8 Investments I I I
(Appropriated Reserves and I I I I
Carry-over) I 90,080 I 46,250 I 48,165 I I
Interest S Misc. Receipts I -----5,0 775 00 ---------0 -----------
---------0
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I -----------
SUB-TOTAL' I 5,000 I 0 I 775 I 0
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- .----------
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 95,080 I 46,250 I 48,940 0
D27E
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1939.90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND B2 BOND AND INTEREST - 1958
....................................... . .. .......... . ....-.--. I ...-....... I ...........
ESTIMATED I I
APPRWED APPRWED ACTUAL I I RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET I BUDGET I EXPENDITURE I BUDGET
1957.88 198 -89 19
I i
1989.9
................ --- ..... ...........
BONG RETIREMENT ANO .NTEREST -.........
Principai on Bonds 350,000 350,000 350,000
Interest on Bonds j 6,000 j 3,000 I 3.000 I I
Transfer to Capital Faci Llties Furl I I 58,756 I 79,122 I I
---356,000 ` ---411,736 ..•TOTAL 432,122 I I -.•-.....0
AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE I 405,667 I """"""" I I I "
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS I --•761,687 I 411,7 I ........0.
56.
...........
AVAILABLE FUNDING I .......:...
................. I I
Cash & Investments
(Appropriated Reserves and I I
Carry-over) I 721,687 I 397,832 I 415,609
...........
Interest & Misc. Receipts 40,000 13,924 25,778
----------- I ........... ........... I ...........
SUBTOTAL I 40,000 I 13,924 25,778 I I O
........... ........... I ...........
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 761,687 I 411,756 441,3B7 I 0
........... I ........,.. I ....,...... I I ...........
COONTY SANITATIOI DISTRICT NO.2 6/6/89
YNEODLE Of DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS
PROJECT TOTAL C.I.P. 19B9-W 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 5-Yaar Total 1994.99 10-Year Total
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ........... .............
Santa Ans Ricer Interceptor, 2-1411 (a) 531,000 S1,000 40,OW ",OW 450,0W 450,NO
Liability to Anshelm Its
South Sent.Are River Tank (a) 1W,NO t00,000 1N,W0 100,00D
South River Trull Extension (3) (a) 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000
East Richfield Interceptor 2-22 (1) (a) n9,WO 669,W0 50,000 50,000 50,000
S.A.R.1. Belief (3) (e) 7,000,000 0 2,000,ON 7,000,W0
Novhepa/Placentia Relief Sowers (a)
1. s.u[h Anaheim Relief Sever, 2-22 ()) 1,3%,ON ]96,000 900,ON IOO,NO 1,000,WO I,WO,DOD
2. katella Relief, 2-28 (2) 1,126,ON 26,OOo 1,OOo,000 100,ON 1,100,OW 1,100,000
3. or.rMoW Diversion, 2-29 (3) 1,n0,000 100,000 1.00D,ON) loo,OW 1,2oo,oDO Lzao,Ooo
Euclid Interceptor Sewer (a)
1. Orense.orm 10 Broadway 2-26 (1) 3,no,o00 SO,NO 3,000,00 200,000 3,200,00D 3,200,000
2. Edirper to Least..,,.. 216.2 (1) 8,969,OW 269,No 2,WO,WO .WO,ON 8,200,000 8,YY0,000
3. Benham, to Orenaethorpe, 2-26-3 (2) 8,535,00 535,000 6,WO,N0 2,No,OW 8,Wo,oOO 8,000,000
North Branch of Selling Hills
Subtrunk Relief 2.11.3 (2) (a) 4N,000 63,OW 400,000 n,NO 425,NO 425,000
Sol.. Samar Relief (3) 1.) 400,OW 0 400,000 fN,NO
Batavia/Lincoln Trunk Relief (3) (a) 300,000 ]N,OW 300,000 300,000
Taft Intercepter Rower 2.6.2 (3) (a) 1,5W,000 0 1,5OD,COD 1,500,N0
Niscellanewn Projects (a) 1,n0,N0 1n,000 tn,0en in,= 123,WO 1n,OW Bn,WO an,000 1,n0,CW
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
GRAND TOTAL 1y,50G,000 2,089,OW 19,925,000 4,550,000 S15,OW 1n,0W 4n,N0 25,640,ON 9,]]5,000 35,415,000
vmumr .m..evvees ....... .......env mvvvvvue< .avv..__wv ........... ...........
(a) fully futled 1. Masterplanned N facilities presently uer ceratimcdon
LOT Partially Turmoil 2. Nester-,lama facilities presantly under daci9n
(.) Flat fu ded 3. Nester-plemad facilities scheduled for future design/.. rettion
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ND. 2 6/22/89
FISCAL ETURN ENT 1989-W PROJECTED CASH
IDI G-99 Pepe 1
LINE 1980-90 19%-01 1991-92 19D2-93 1W3-% S-Ynr Teel 19p4-99 10-Year Total LINE
.... .._._.. .....Do .BRIM ....... ....... .........-.. .._........ .....-..-.... ....
OPER.L---- -UW ...... 695... Stm.m 5110.W ....
.............. ..._.-. ....... ------- ....... ...........
19,0n
Z1,658
1 Rnerna t rirry•W.r ir®Lnt xee� 9,......D ......Om .......Om ......,0m .......... ......m0 ......1m0 ......... 1
REVENUE
2 Share of 16 iax Allmatlon 7,943,000 8,635,OW p,SB6,000 10,204,000 11,100,000 47,268,Om T1,7S9,m0 119,W7,0m 2
3 ien: IMd xtrlel Nast. 2,252,000 2,5%,Coo 2,978,000 3,425,000 ],939,000 1S,18f,Om 30,5f0,m0 65,n4,D00 3
< 5�oleantel User 15:230,000 20,876,000 23,302,000 26,6S0,000 64,XSB,Om 161,649,000 265,707,000 f
5 Inmmt 1 Miscellemwe Inctn 666,000 2%,000 440,000 609,000 B40,OOD 2,933,000 10,140,000 13 on OCKI S
6 Transfer f m Capital Fad f,601,000 4,6e1.000 <,601,000 6
7 OLher Be. 0 0 7
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
e TOTAL REVENUE 15,f62,000 %,TSI,OOD JS,bW,000 37,620,Om f0,529,Om 154,m4,Om 2R,%B,mO 428,112,000 8
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .....-_.— ...........
9 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 2f,828,Om M,169.Om 4).B%,OOD 56,692,Om 64.187,m0 lm,410,m0 298,763,000 43Y,478,m0 9
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .... ...... ........... ...........
EXPENDITURES
10 are of Joint Wrks M b 0 14,232,000 16,AB,000 18,665.000 19,231,m0 22.029,W0 90,455,Om Im,m,mO 239,1855m 10
11 Collection fvytJtn M e O eM Other Oyer. 1,180,000 1,261,OOD 1,M,000 1,453,000 11563,No 6,810,000 9,w2,Om 16,9W,Om 11
12 Other Expeaml Lures 4,4m,Om 8,800,Om 12,350,000 IS 900,000 41,450,m0 T9,5m,m0 120195O,m0 12
........... .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
.
13 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 15,<12,m0 21,959,Om 28,B1B.Om 3],OS4,Om ]9.4%,m0 lm,T15,m0 258,122,W0 3%,83),m0 13
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ...........
15 MostrYeme. 01, Perii6[Fualin, Rayiremmm. 1,47m,S00 f012900,000 14.4w.Om00 16,511,0=00 19;�,000 19,7W466;� 3U,BS1,W0 30,80S1,,W 15
._•........ ........... ........... .......... ........... .._--_..... .._... .... ...........
16 iud Beleme or (Deficit) 1,)f0,000 1,2W,Om <,66J,OOD 7541,m0 4,%9,000 4,%9,m0 9,M,000 9,7%,m0 16
tAPlru ruNLs) a.......... ....®..... ........... ........... ........_.. .......m.. .......... �......
...............
li Benry . b Carry-over I,.Last Veer 59,A2,000 11,47<,000 45,OES.Om 13,321,Om 56,639,000 59,M,NO 51,520,OW 59,)92,m0 17
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ........... ...........
REVENUE
tB Cn.trmtim Glen[. 790,e00 791D,000 TW,Om 18
19 ins: Cemettion 4,909,OW 5,144,000 5,395,OW S,D46,Dm S,09,mO 27,033,W0 3f15m,NO 61,533,0W 19
20 lndntrial wale 920,Om 1.OS8,OOD 1,217,00 1,399,m0 1.6W,000 6,203,OW 12,475,000 18,678,001) 20
21 supplennbl Neer 0 0 21
22 Sal< oi C.pscity Riphts 1,349,000 135,00 13S,m0 3WIOm 5,%1,m0 S,%0,000 2,1%,Dm BjM:Dll 22
23 Intere.< A Mfatellemmm inane 2,526.00D 2,03,m0 2,060,000 :WORD ,834,m0 12,911,00 9,31D,000 22,221,m0 23
24 Other Imon .-..-..-.-- W,mO,WO )1,000,000 -.-----.-_- 159,Om,mO ._--_.----. 159,000•WO 24
........... ........... ........... . ........ ...........
25 TOTAL REVENUE 10,494,00D %,340,m0 B,B15,Om W,915,Om 1S,313,000 211,877,000 58,389,Om 270,266,m0 25
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
26 TWA AVAILABLE iWD1XG 70,286,Om t07,814,m0 53,BS6,O.. %........ 2...66p,m0 109,9m,000 ........... 26
f%PFYOIIURFS
2J share ei Jei nt Wrks Treatmeal Pln[ 29,564,000 41,077,mU 35,8A,00 n,327,Om 15,9Wm0 144.747,m0 71,968,mO 216,715,000 27
28 District Colle.tim Syslea 19,925,000 4.550,000 515,ODO - MAIN) 4R,OW 6 "0,000 9,7TS,ODD 35,415,coo 28
29 COP Foymea[s 4,1%,Om 4,164,Om <,123,0m 4,W5,000 4,07,em 20,67,Om 19,716,OCD W,353,0m 29
30 Tren.fer to Operatlm iW 4,mt,Dm A wri3Om 4,Wi,WO 30
31 Dther E.peneimrn 524,000 13,WO,Om 11,000,Om 24,524,m0 24,524,00D 31
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
32 TOTAL EXPENDITUREB 58,812,m0 62,T91,m0 t0,51),Om 37,597,Om W,<32,m0 220,1<9,mO 101,459•m0 321,6%,000 32
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .. ........... ...........
33 Reserves A Carry-over to Meat Year e 1�7�000 <5.023,WOc 13,321,Om6 c5 63.9,000e �5 v520,Om 61 520,000 • 8,450,Om c 8,450,Om 33
COUNTY SAIIITATIOW DISTRICT W. 2 6/22/0
STATEMENT Of PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pa0. 2
FISCAL YEARS 1989-90 TMRONM 1998-99
LINE 1989-% 1990-91 1991.92 1992.93 1993.9{ 5•Ysar ionl 1994.99 10•Yar Totsl LINE
---- ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ----
OM FUNDS)
34 Reserves 6 Cerry-over frog Lest Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34
........... ........... .......:... ........... ........... .....------ ........... ...........
REVENUE
35 Tex Lew 0 0 33
3) Other jrtramXiarelleneaus Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 36
37
le TOTAL REVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 SE
39 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39
EXPENDITURES
40 Band Drinc ipsl S Interest 0 0 40
41 Other Expenditures - 41
42 TOT4l EXPERT)IIUREb 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
43 Reserves 2 Carry-Over to Next Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43
44 Most Year's Dry Parise! fundirp Raqui remOnts 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 44
45 fund Balance or (Deficit) O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45
SUMMARY (AtliusteN for Intar-fund Transfers) •vvvv.v..0vv vvvvvvvvv..v v...vvv...e .o..v=vvvv v..v...v...v .m m vvvv
46 Reserves 6 Carry-Over Fr04 Lest Year 6D,158,000 20,890,000 59,233,00D 32,393,000 80,292,000 0,158,000 76,215,000 69,158,OOD 46
40 TOTAL REVENUE 21,355,000 123,093,000 42,495,000 118,535,06D 55,842,ODD 361,320,000 332,459,000 693,122,OOD 49
48 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 90,513,000 143,983,000 101.R8,000 150,928,000 135,139,000 430,428,000 408,602,000 762,935,000 48
49 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 69,623,0OB 84,250,00D 69,335,000 RO,6fl,D00 59,924,000 3%,263,000 359,581,000 y13,844,000 49
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ....-..---' ---------.. -..--------
50 Reserves 6 Cerry-Ovrt to Next Year 20,090,000 59,2D,000 3Z,393,OX1 00,291,000 96,215,000 76,215,000 49,091,000 49,091,000 50
51 Next Year's Dry Peri06 Funding Requirements 2,906,000 10,980,000 14,409,m 16,511,000 19,746,000 19,246,000 30,851,ow 30,651,000 51
........... ........... .... . . ........... ........... ....---.--- ----------. ----.......
52 FUND BALANCE OR (DEFICIT) 13,18f,000 48,251,000 fl,984,WD b1,28D,000 56,469,OOO 56,469,000 18,20,000 18,240,000 52
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
Pr11TATIO,V
tcpclitan O �IST
Sl't f Q 'P
D �
U $ b N
`Since 1954
��4NGE COCK
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.3 6/22189
BUDGET RECWMENDATIONS Page 1
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT #3 SUMMARY
....................................... I ----------- I ----------- _.________-
APPROVED APPROVED RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET I BUDGET BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 1989-90
....................................... ........... ........... -----------
REQUIREMENTS
------------
Operating A Capital ....RequitenaertS
........
Operating Fund 19,985,000 21,169,000 24,746,000
Construction Fund 42,083,000 34,027,000 18,746,000
Capital Facilities Fund 147,862,000
---------- •I ---------- •� ---------- •�
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 8 CAPITAL 1125,507,000 1109,048,000 1 91,354,000 1
----------- I ----------- -----------
Debt Retirement
Bond and Interest Fund - 1951 8 1958 71,000
------- •� ------- ------ •�
TOTAL REGUIREMENTS 1126,153,244 1109,656,000 1 91,425,000 1
........... 1 ........„ I .......,...
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.3 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Pepe 2
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT B3 SUMMARY
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- 1 ........... 1
I I I I
I APPROVED I APPROVED I RECOMMENDED 1
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BLOW I BUDGET I BUDGET 1
1 19B7-BB 1 1988.89 1 IM-90 1
....................................... I ........... I ........... 1 -----------
FUNDING I I I I
Operating & Capltal Funding I I I I
........................... I I I I
I I I I
Cash & Imas[mants (Appropriated I I I I
Reserves and Carry-Over) 1102,904,000 1 89,631,000 1 62,792,000 1
1 1 1 1
Other Revenue 1 12,926,000 e1 9,972,000 el 18,235,000 •1
I I I
Anticipated iez Allocation I I I I
From 1% Levy 1 9,177,000 1 9,445,000 1 10,171,000 1
1 ........... 1 ........... ........... 1
SUBTOTAL OPERATING & CAPITAL 1125,007,000 1109,048,000 1 91,198,D00 I
........... I ----------- ----------- 1
I I I
Debt Retirement I I I
I I I I
Cash 8 Investments (Appropriated I I I I
Reserves & Carry-over) 1 89,244 1 108,000 1 84,000 1
I I I I
Other Revenue 1 7,000 1 6,000 1 4,000 1
I I I I
Amount Raised by Taxes for I I I I
Debt Obligation 1 1,050,000 1 494,000 1 139,000 1
........... 1 ----------- I -----------
SUB-TOTAL DEBT RETIREMENT 1 1,146,244 1 608,000 1 227,000
........... 1 ........... 1 -----.-...-
TOTAL FUNDING 1126,153,244 1109,656,000 1 91,425,000
1 .......... I ........... 1 .....,..,.,
'Adjusted for Inter-Fund Transfers
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.3 Page i
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/15/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 03 OPERATING
_______________________________________ I ------ -----------
I ___________ I ...........
I ESTIMATED I ...........
APPROVED APPROVED 1 ACTUAL I RECOMMENDED,
DESCRIPTION ON ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I MMGET EXPENDITURE I BUDGET
1987-85 I 1988-69 1988-89 I 1989-90
-------•------------------------------- ! -------•--- i ----------- ----------- ----------- ..........
OPERATING
--Director's Fees I 25,GOO I 31,000 I 25,300 I I 30.000
I I I I I
Contractual services
Share of Joint Operating 110,903,000 12,265,G00 111,092,000 I j 14,156,000
Trunk Maintenance I 170,000 I 225,000 I 178,400 I I 225,000
Upstream Odor Control I 90,000 I 200,000 I 62,200 I I 200,000
Manhole Line and Net Nell Repairs I 155,000 I 475,00(1 I 3,100 I I 475,000
Pub Station Maintenance I 175,000 I 175,000 I 16l,500 I 175,000
Permit and Ind. Waste Admin. I 100,000 I 120,000 I 107,100 I 120,000
Conne:tian Fes Admin. I 30,000 I 45,000 I 71,100 I 134,100
Inter-Dist. Setter Use Charge I 1,coo I 1,000 I 700 I I 1,000
w Bo COLLection Expense I 1,000 I I,CDO I Soo I I 1,000
Tax Collection Expense I 23,700 I 28,000 I 25,700 I ",900
Treasurer's Investment Adm.
S Band no Fees I 50,000 I 61,200 I 47,900 I I 53,000
Utilities j 150,000 150,000 j 134,000 j j 150,000
Professi anal Services I 20,000 25,000 I 8,900 I I 20,000
User Fee Expense I I 30,000 I 60,700 I I 346,000
Printing Arid Publication I 1,300 I 2.500 I 2,700 I ' 3,000
Travel 0 Meeting - Directors j 2,000 j 1,500 j 1,500 j j 2,000
I I I I I
urcOLLeotible Aeeowca I 2,000
----- I 1. I I I -----
TOTAL OPERATING I I!,699,000 13,838,000 11,983,3G0 I 116,131.000
_ i ___________
OP MOM- ERATING ___________
-- ---Interest I 102,000 I 1,000 I 52,300
Expenses Applicable to Prior Years I ---- 2-000 I •••• 2,000 I ---- 6,500- I •••-2.000
TOTAL MO1-OPERATING I 104,D00 I 3,000 II 58,800 I 2,000
----------- I ----------- I ____-______
TOTAL OPERATING 8 NON-OPERATING 112,003,000 13,841,000 12,042,100 I 116,140,000
.......... I ___________ ___________ I I ___________
RESERVES
Appropriation for Contingencies I 1,950,000 I 407,000 I I 536,000
I I I I
Authorized General Reserve I --------- I --------- I I 8,070,000
------
TOTAL RESERVES I 7,982,000 I 7,328,000 I 0 1 I 8,606,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I _____.___..
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 119,985,000 121,169,000 112,042,1DO I 124,746,ODO
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.3 Pop 2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/15/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 03 OPERATING
....................................... I -----------
I -----------
I ........... ..........
ESTIIWTEO
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987.88 190E-89 1988.89 1989.90
AVAILABLE FUNDING
.............
Cash & Investments
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-Over) 3,741,000 9,921,000 7,912,300 4,969,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ...........
Fees 1,190,000 850,000 1,232,600 1,356,000
Supplemental Fees I 7,769,000
Interest & Misc. Receipts 593,000 611,000 549,800 481,000
Delinquent Taxes 284,000 342,000 404,100 509,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
SUB-TOTAL 2,067,080 1,803,000 2,186,500 10,115,000
Tax Ailecetion 9,043,000 9,200,000 8,641,100 9,459,000
Subventions 134,000 245,000 223,41 203,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
SUB-TOTAL 9,177,000 9,445,000 8,864,500 9,662,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 119,vvmevv 21,169,000veevv I vvvvew•• 24,746,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.3 Page 1
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND R3 CAPITAL FACILITIES
....................................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90
....................................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES
-------------------------
Treatment Plant Facilities 17,915,000
Appropriation for Master-Ptarned
Treatment Plant Facilities 39,C47,000 28,673,000 4,684,000
Master Plan/EIR Update 125,000 125,000
Reimburse Other CSD's for Seat Beech
BIM. Pulp Station Equity 85,000 85,000
Red to Linked Telemetry System 25,000 25,000
Local Agency Manhole
Reiaburserent Program 23,000
Knott Interceptor Manhole Repaig3-34R 250,000 200,000 200,000
Milter Molder Trunk Sesser Rehab.
1. Vault Rehabilitation, 3-28A 5,000,000 4,300,000 1,780,D00 1,200,000
2. Manhole Rehabflitati on, 3-33R 2,500,000 3,300,000 29,000 3,500,000
Urgency Manhole Replacement, 3.94R 320,000 214,000
Artesia Branch Subtrunk Relief 300,000 62,000 300,000
Miller Not der Relief 2,000,000 2,000,000
Imperial Relief Interceptor 500,000 500,000 1,450,000
Orange/Western Subtrunk Relief
Sewer, 3-25 500,000 500,000 11,000 1,200,000
Lamson Branch of Noover-Western 200,000 200,000 400,000
Hoover-Western Subtrunk Relief
on Trask 400,000 400,000 800,000
LahWon Interceptor Sewer, 3.24-2 350,000 350,000 21,000 1,400,000
La Nabra Purchase Relief 2,000,000 6,700,000
Magnolia Relief Sewer 8U0,00D 800,000 1,150,000
Beach Relief Trunk, Malvern
to Imperial 5,200,000
Los Alamitos Subtrunk Relief 3,200,000 3,200,000 4,400,000
Purchase of Capacity tram District 11 1,500,000
Joint Yorks Equity Purchase 1,358,000 18,000 675,000
Esrthquake/Flood Damage Reserve 936,000 1,244,000 1,563,000
Appropriation for District
Facilities Inproveaents and
Expansion 4,090,000 800,000 13,000 1,000,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ---'---....
SUB-TOTAL 63,439,000 53,852,000 2,943,000 47,862,000
........... ........... ........... -------...-
Transfer to Construction Fund 7,596,000 11,591,400 2,209,000
Transfer to 1951 Bond Fund 156,000
COP Payment Transfer to Const. Fend 4,131,000 4,487,000 4,487,000 4,549,000
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 67,570,000 65,935,000 19,177.400 54,620,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.3 Page 2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 93 CAPITAL FACILITIES
....................................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ..........
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION ON ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987-88 1988-69 1988-89 1989-90
--------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
AVAI LABLE FUNDING
-----------------
Cash 4 Investmerts
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-over) $8,538,000 58,461,OOD 57,891,100 46,522,000
........... ........... ........... -----------
Construction Grants 2,264,000 854,000 21,500 858,000
Comeeti on Fees 600,000 900,000 1,422,000 2,682,000
Irdustriat Waste Fees 495,000 350,000 504,000 554,000
Sate of Capacity Rights 1,354,000 1,468,000 21,900 1,465,000
Joint Works Equity Sate 134,000
Interest and Misc. Receipts 3,799,000 3,922,000 5,265,000 2,249,000
........... ........... ........... -----------
SUB-TOTAL 8,532,000 7,494,000 7,234,400 7,942,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ...........
Transfer from Bond Fund 500,000 156,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 67,570,000 65,95,000 65,125,500 54,620,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 6/27/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 0 CONSTRUCTION/COP PAYMENT
....................................... .........•• ----------- I ----------- ----------- •----------
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
____..__..__ 1987-88_•- 1988.89 1988-89 ........... 1989-90
.......................... ... . ........... .___._.___. ...........
PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES
Treatment Plant Expansion 117,990,000 29,540,000 19,020,500 14,197,000
Appropriation for Master-PLAnned
Treatment Plant Foci titiee 119,962,000
SUB-TOTAL 37,952,000 129,540,000 19,020,500 114,197,000
----------- I ----------- -------"'- -----------
COP Installment Payments 4,131,000 4,487,000 4,458,000 4,549,000
----------- ----------- ----------- _ _ _
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 42,083,000 34,027,000 23,478,500 18,746,000
AVAILABLE FUNDING
Cash and Investnents
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-over) 35,625,GDO 21,269,000 ' 20,882,MD I 111,301,000
Proceeds frmSale of Certificates j
of Participation
Transfer from Capital Facilities Fund 7,596,000 11,591,400 2,209,000
Interest & Misc. Receipts 2,327,000 675,000 1,5%,700 I 687,000
SUB-TOTAL 2,327,000 a,271,000 13,188,iDD 2,8%,000
TRANSFER FOR INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS
---------------------------------
COP Payment Transfer fraR Capital Fund 4,131,000 4,487,000 4,487,000 4,549,000
........... I ----------- ----------- I I _._____---.
TOTAL AVAILABLE FINDING , .......... I .......... 38...v80.. � I .......0...
. I . . . I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RO.3
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 03 BOND AND INTEREST - 1951 & 1958
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I ---•---•-•- I ----------- I -----------
ESTIMATED
APPROVED I APPROVED I ACTUAL I I RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET I EXPENDITURE I I BUDGET
1997-88 I 198E-89 I 1988-89 I I 1989.90
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
BdiD RETIREMENT AND INTEREST I I I I I
----•--••-------•-•--------- I I I I I
Principat on Bonds I 535,000 I 535,000 I 535,000 I I 34,500
Interest on Bonds j 12,414 j 6,851 j 6,851 j j 1,2%
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I I -----------
SUB-TGTAL I 547,414 I 541,851 I 541,851 I I 35,794
----------- I ----------- I -_°= I I ------...--
Transfer to CapitaL Facilities I 500,000 I I I I 156,000
AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE I 98,830 I 66,149 I I I 35,2D6
I ----------- I ----------- I I ( -----------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS I 1,146,244 I 605,000 I I I 227,000
AVAILABLE FUNDING
----------------- I I I I
Cash & Investments I I I I I
(Appropriated Reserves and I I I I I
Dar"-over) I 89,2Vd I 108,0GO I 114,137 I I 86,000
I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
Interest & Misc. Receipts 7,000 I 6,000 I 10,352 I 4,000
I ---------•- I ----•--•--- I -•--------- I I -----------
SIIB-TOTAL I 7,000 I 6,000 I 10,352 I 4,000
----------- I ---------- I ----------- ------ ----
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES I 1,050,000 I 494,000 I 493,580 139,000
----------- I ----------- I -•--------- I ----------
Transfer frou Capital Facilities I I I 156,000 I
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING j 1,1A6,2AA j ---608,000 j ---77o,069 j j ---227,000
Outstanding G.D. Bands 8 6/30/89: $69,000
Final Payment Date: 1951 - August, 1990
COIINTT SANITAT101 DISTRICT MD.3 6/19/09
SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS
PROJECT TOTAL C.I.V. 1%9-% IM-91 1991.92 Im-93 1993-94 5-Veer Total 1994-99 10-Tear Total
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ........... .............
Reset Interceptor Methate Reasir, 3-34R (1) (a) 400,001) %0,000 2%,= t%,0% 2%,M
Mi Ller Neither Trunk Sever (1)) (
1. Vault Rehabilitation, it
-2BRq 2,980,e% I.M.0% 1,200,%0 1,no am 1,2%,000 -
2. Manhole Rehabilitation, 3.33R 3,5n.m 29,0% 500,0% 2,0%,0% 1,0%,000 3,5%,0% 3,No no
Artesia Branch SW-trunk Relief 13) (a) 300,%0 0 300,p00 300,000
Wastsis,Rol let (3) (a) 5,5%,O% 500,W0 wo'com S,e00,M S,SO0,o00
leperial Relief Interceptor (3) (a) 1.450,000 0 1,4%,Doo 1,450,000
Osre"3--25(1) (a),M n Relief
n 1,211.e00 11,000 400,000 000,0% I'M' % 1,ROo,000
gtltt Intercetor Relief, Orrgethorpe
to Artesia (3) (a) 2,600,000 0 2,600,000 2,600,m
R.r/NMtern L6trW
Relief an Trask (3) (a) BOo,%0 900,000 D%,000 000,000
LnMMon Intercepter Seger, 3-24.2 (1) (a) 1.421,000 21,000 4%,%0 1,D00,%0 1,400,e% 1,4o I'm
LNrymn Drerch of Noover/Weatarn (3) (AT 400,000 0 400,0% 400,000
Beach Relief Trunk, Malvern to Imperial (3) (A) 5,200,000 20o,000 3,M,M 2,%O,OOo 5,200,000 5,200,000
Beech Rol let Truk, Western to Malvern (3) (a) 5,800,000 0 S,000,M 5,000,e00
Los ALselto, L4trorek Relief (3) (a) 4,400,000 3,000,000 1'aimi' 0 4,40'%0 4,400,000
McBrotle Relief Sauer (3) (a) 1,150'am 0 1,1%,e% 1,150,000
Miscelleneau0 Projects (A) 2,000,e00 RO0,0% 2%,m 200,041101 2%,000 200,0% 1,D%,%0 1,%O,WO 2,e%,OW
ORANU IOTAL 39,141,000 2,Ot1,D00 2,9%,0% 4,200,0% ],t%,0% 3,6%,0% 1,500,000 19,f00,0% 19,M0o,000 52,100,000
(m) fully rutleth I. MmtervpLemetl facilities Presently eraser canstruction
(b) Partially Mrtlath 2. Muter-PLemetl faailities Presently ender 2oei0n
(q Net Pestles 3. Maater,Lemath facilities scbMrLel for future thearigNeamtruetion
COUNTY SANITATION DIS79ICT NO. 3 6y 119
11°SGLEYFYS019h9 90 TKAa0nNtr 99 Pace t
LINE 19m-90 TWO-91 1991-92 199E-93 I993.9{ !�.-Teel Total 1994-99 10-Year Total LINE
___- ....... ....... ....... ....... sill... . ______._. ............ .........._._ ....
OPERATING EUND f30.m ...... ...... ...... B10D.00 f150.00
.._ TC ....... ....... ....... ....... alas... ............
1 Raerva 6 Corry-Over Prm Lest Yar ......... ......... .......... .......... .......... .... ---- ---------- --------- 1
REVEWE pppppp ]��]iil!pp pbbZ2Z2 E�pppp pp
2 share of IX Tex AWeastim 1p; 11: 1];W ;DW 19revv,9N 22:91-M M;l I;9� 69 16f 000 10,109,E 119,Swb; 5
3 Tam: 1Mutr101 Yeste t
< SW g(mantel User 90;374;000 17l,850,W0 264,22t,0m <
5 Interest 6 114C.Ilemau lava 48t,000 740,000 1,079.m 1,659,000 2;mo:o00 6,167,000 14,125,000 20:M:ODO S
6 Other R. ......... 0 ............0 b
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............
7 TOTAL REVENUE 19,771,000 26,iM,000 br721,000 40,iW,00D K,69f,000 167,456,000 304,681,000 472,139,000 7
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... -----------
B TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 2i,746,D00 SS,OB2,00D 47r22S,000 SB,T13,000 ]{,562,000 172,427,000 B7,8m.wo 471,10B4Ob 6
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
EXPENDITURES �56 pp 5p{p
t0 Share
ol ercioii fiynattm N B 06ard Other O9er. '1;9ex 00O 1 ,PSO;m t5;600;000 t0;B010;000 12;300;000 39;6001:000 104;7«SO;Wo lu1;m; 11 11 Other 2ycNitvroS
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... -.......... ....64
12 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16,140,000 22,A8,000 29,]02,000 29,645,000 {1,373,OOD 139,238,000 EB0,066,000 419,104,000 12
...6.py...p... ...s........ ......�...... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
IS Res°rra 6 GryY-erer to Nat Year 9;0]Or,000 11;989:1 if;6S1,OW 1f;9�23;00 20;687;000 2AO;o99;0�00 16;tA 00o 1e;122;OW 1C
14 Next iar•e Dry Perlatl IUMInB Raulrmxmb
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ......... ............ ......_.....
Is 9uM Belsome or (Deflelq Sb,000 1,215,000 3,272,000 13,945,000 12,502,000 12,502,01111 2I.M.000 21,6112,000 15
CAPITAL rURD(S)
16 Reeerres 6 Cvrry-owr P.Lest Year .......... .......... .......... ......... .......... ....... .......... .......... 16
REVENUE
17 Cautructlm Drente Bb,coo 856.000 858,mo 17
IB Pees: Oamsctlm 2,662,DOD 2,809,000 2,944,000 3,080,000 3,241,000 14,756,000 I0,B38,000 33,5%,000 15
IO 1nlatr al West. 554,000 637,000 733,000 043,000 %9,OD0 3,M UOO 7,510,000 11,246,000 19
21 Sete a C°C°9°(°JOGl tnytRlBlltar 1,49 ODD 718,000 130,000 5,070,000 1,424,000 8,815.000 p1,671,000 12E1ooSy,492,0w 21
5 oth:�°aticA Ascell°irau laaa 2,M:ODD B29;W0:� 2,25s,000 80;ODo:oOD 4,O1s,000 1]6:ZPo;oao 05:90: 2{1:2µ99D:088 ?3
alai....... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ---------!.
24 TOTAL REVENUE 8,185,000 W,m,wo 6,042,000 99,575,000 9,649,o00 219,019,000 10],910,0o0 322,929,ODD 24
........... ........... ...... .... . ....... ........... ........... ............ ............
25 T07AL AVAILABLE FUNDING 66,600,000 120,313,D00 60,228,.000 tog,164,000 73,S2S,000 276,842,000 I54,269,000 360,152,000 2S
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
26y EXPENDITURES
27 Distri fc6mt CmmAtlectlm S„t®mane 91at 12;900;0oo 4:M1o00'am Si;mo,wo 23,6NNO oo 11;500;9W 110:400;000 11;i90;0�00 J];1DO:p 9 26
29 Other°2x9entlIt.... 1;10O;OODD 13; 15;us 4 {m m 13:4
3
7
:Z 4,]96,000 27,500,000 29,no.W0 37:2 0,00 ED
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...--'----- ----___..... --_..._.....
30 TOTAL EXPENDITURES U.061,OOD 66,329.000 30.639,000' H,260,m0 E3,166,o00 226,483,00D 126,902,m0 353,465,000 b
31 Raerva 6 Garry-over to Next Year 2S,b7,00D 54,166,000 9,S69,OOD b],876,000 50,359,000 50,359,000 21,287,000 27,267,000 31
DOINtT SANITATION DISTRICT 0. 3 6/U/0
FI6GLEVMS0IW-NCTEIWW NIM 99 9e9e 2
LINE 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 5-YRAr total 1994.99 10-Year fool LINE
-•__ .... ------- •...... ....... -•--.-. ..--••_----- ------•--•-_ •----••------ ----
BOND NOTE)
R ReaerVas S Carry-Over Fr®Last Year 04,000 35,000 0 0 0 66,000 0 R{,ODO 32
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..........-- ............
REVENUE
11 TeX Leevvyy W,000 In D00 5�000 �3
35 IrlOth:,.1 A W.Ummmm 1. 6,001 0 0 0 {,DOD 0 {;WO 3{
........... ........... ........... .........•• -------.--- ---.__..... _---........ ............ N
36 TOTAL REVENUE 10,000 0 0 0 0 tu,000 0 10r000 36
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ---__-._--- ............ ............
37 TOTAL AVAIIARLE FUNDING 227,D01 8,000 0 0 0 227,000 0 W,000 n
........... ........... .........1. ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
EXPENDITURES ]1 pp y
39 w erai60Cepit6ltix111ties 156;00m0 W'm 0 0 0 156;W0 136:[E8 39
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ----------- ............ ............
f0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 192,000 35,000 0 0 0 UT,= 0 22],ODO f0
41 RaasrVef 8 Carry-opvYap to Neat Year 35,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
42 Nast Yasr'a Dry Par1W TUINiro Requfr�Iln 35,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
<S FIa10 Y (Adju 9r (Deficit) ese m 0 0 e®ev60 0 ®�0 0 m 0 43
AaNMY (ANI [e0 Ix Inter-Slag lreaslen)
45 R TOITALREVENUE-Mar Er®Last iasr 9:7':WDD 1:1;6ft;E� 40;1763;0000 127,512,001)
5W,OS000 55,364];� 3 6;0620;= 4m,"1;m ]9;311 T� {5
----------- ----------- ----------- ----"--_--- _...._._--. -"---_-__. ............ ...........-
0 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 9I,59....GD 155,632,000 t0T,453,000 16],B]T,WO 14B,OB),000 449,496,000 492,139,000 05R,00T,OOD 46
47 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 51,393,000 BN,9{2,W0 991941,000 75,113,000 64,539,0010 365,94R,000 4",04B4O00 TT2,996,000 47
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ----------- ............ ............
9N YeeD Pm ic f Real Year 8O11E0;m1 1;m1, 3' O; { Mm;� �;D1;� ; 94 .tarlry dF HlRequj.tA : m , 90 <6 ,MD I; ;2060]OW 61 3612; 0 f
........... ..•-----•-- ----------_ ---___--_•_ _-----•-•-• ----...-... ..........
FIDN BALANCE OR (DEFICIT) Tb, ,00D 55®1,e00 12,061,000 ]T,B21,000 a,B�a, ®®,861� {0® 9®,m "'m' 00 30
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
P1y1TATION
olitan O� oO`ST
a
J .a4 a�'P�C1
U o �e N
h = .a
Since 195"
OggJVGE COIN
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Page 1
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT R5 SUMMARY
....................................... ........... I ----------- I -_______-__
I I I I
I APPROVED I APPROVED I RECOMMENDED I
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET I BUDGET I -
1987-88 I 1988-89 I 1989-90
_______________________________________ I ----------- I ----------- I ____-_-____
I I I
REQUIREMENTS
I I I
Operating -8 Cepitsl Require-- ---- I I I
I I I I
op.r.eim Fund I 5,737,000 16,190,000 16,766,000 I
I I I I
Capital Facilities Fund 18,249,000
---------- 1 ------,OU0 • ---------
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 8 CAPITAL 118,328,000 125,717,000 115,015,000
I ----------- I ----••-•-•- I -----------De
I
I I I I
.... Retirement I I I
I I I
Bond and Interest Find - 1951 I 52,000
------ ------ ------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 118,382,011 25,772,000 115,067,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 6/22/89
4 BUDGET RECg01ENDATIONS Page 2
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT A5 SUMMARY
------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I .----------
I I I I
I APPROVED I APPROVED I RECOMMENDED I
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET I BUDGET
1987-88 I 1988-89 I 1989.90
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
I I I I
FUNDING I I I
....... I I I I
I I I
Operating 6 Capital Funding I I I
I
Cash 6 Investments (Appropriated I I
Reserves and tarry-Over) 12,601.000 111,300,000 I 8,465,000
Other 0.evem,e - 3,566,000 112,262,000 ^. 4,225,000
nnn t5 paced Tax utoutian I I I
Fram 1% Levy I 2,181,000 I 2,155,000 I 2,325,DDO
I ----------- I ----------- I I
SUB-TOTAL OPERATING A CAPITAL 118,328,000 125.717,000 115,015,000
----------- I ----------- I ---------•-
Debt-R-tir I
I I I I
------ e--- I I I I
I I I I
Cash 8 Investments (Appropriated I I I I
Reserves 6 Carry-Over) I 29.623 I 31,000 20,000
I I I
Other Reverue I 2,000 I 2,000 2,000 I
I I I I
Amount Raised by Taxes for
Debt Obligation I 22,383 I 22,000 I 30,000
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I
SUB-TOTAL DEBT RETIREMENT I 54,011 I 55,000 I 52,000
I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
TOTAL FUNDING 118,382,011 125,772,000 115,067,000
`Adjusted for Inter-Fund Transfers
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 Page 1
BUDGET RECOOIENDAYIONS 6/19/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 05 OPERATING
--------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
ESTI RATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987.88 1986-89 1988.89 1989-90
--------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
OPERATING
Directors- Fees 6,500 6,500 5,700 6,500
Contractual Services
Share of Joint Operating 1,808,000 2,104,000 1,754,000 2,026,000
Trunk Maintenance 75,000 175,000 100,000 175,000
Pump Station Maintenance 250,000 275,000 258,500 275,000
Permit and 1nd.Naste Admin. 15,000 25,000 13,200 20,000
Connection Fee Admin. 37,800 28,800 15,100 34,300
Bond Collection Expense 100 100 100
Tax/Fee Collection Expense 7,300 6,900 8,200 8,700
Treasurer's Investment Ads.
& Banking Fees 10,000 15,000 8,600 7,500
Utiuties 80,000 90,000 105,800 110,000
User Fee Expense 6,500 10,000 8,600 42,000
Professional Services 20,000 10,000 200 5,600
Printing And Publication 1,000 1,000 400 1,000
Travel & Meeting - Directors 300 200 200 300
Uncellectible Accounts 1,500 1,200 1,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
TOTAL OPERATING 2,319,000 2,743,700 2,278,500 2,713,000
NON-OPERATING
-------------
Interest 13,000 300
Expenses Applicable to Prior Years 3,000 3,000 1,100 3,000
TOTAL NON-OPERATING 16,000 3,300 1,100 3,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
TOTAL OPERATING & NON-OPEUTING 2,335,000 2,752,000 2,279,600 2,716,0D0
........... ........... ........... ...........
RESERVES
Approprieti on for Contingencies 2,234,000 2,062,000 2,692,000
Authorized General Reserve 1,168,000 1,376,000 1,358,000
........... ........... ........... ________---
TOTAL RESERVES 3,402,000 3,438,000 0 4,050,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 5,737,000 6,190,000 2,279,600 6,766,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 Page 2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/19/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND N5 OPERATING
..............................'---.---- -----.----. ----------- ----------- ........... ...........
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987-88 1958-89 1988-89 1989-90
--------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
AVAILABLE FUNDING
.................
Cash & Imestumts
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-Over) 3,220,000 3,667,000 3,352,600 3,426,000
Fees 34,000 40,000 91,800 101,000
SupplementeL User Fees 649,000
Interest & Mist. Receipts 235,000 252,000 300,400 I 265,000
Delinquent Texas 67,000 76,000 93,700 116,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
SU8-TOTAL 336,000 368,000 485,900 1,131,000
Tax All ovation 2,139,000 2,101,000 2,000,700 I 2,162,000
Subventions 42,000 54,000 51,800 I 47,000
----------- ----------- ----------- .._........
SUB-TOTAL 2,181,000 2,155,000 2,052,500 2:209,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 5,737,000 6,190,000 5,891,000 6,766,000
vvvvvv_v_ ssvvvvv_vv vvvmvvavvv
CWNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 Page 1
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/39
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND g5 CAPITAL FACILITIES
_______________________________________ ___________ ___________ ESTIMATED ----------- -----------
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET BUDGET EXPENOIiURE BUDGET
1987-88 1988.89 I 1988-89 1989-90
______________________ ______________ .......____
PROJECTS AND ENPENDITIIRES I _..___.____ I ----------- ----------- ------
-----
_________________________ I
Treatment Plant Expansion 2,%9,D00 I 4,967,000 3,148,000 5,260,000
Appropriation for Naster-vlamrod
Treatment Plant Facilities I 1,415,000
Radio Linked Tel eset ry System 50,000 I 50,000
Master Plan/EIR Update 40,000 25,000 I
leprovements to Bey Bridge Pulp Station I 600,000 j 20,000 j 79,000 j j 800,000
Rehabilitate Lido am INCH Force Mains, j I
Lido Force Main to Valve 119" 5-26 200,000 4,000
"A" St., 14th St. and Lido Puna
Station Dryrovenents 310,000
Coast Trunk Force Maim I
Newport Blvd. to Back Bay and
Santa Am River to Bitter Point
Piap Station, 5.29 2,208,000 6,200,000 I 6,632,000
Bitter Point PUMP, Station to
Newport Blvd., 531 283,000 100,000 I 1,246,000 I 150,000
Bitter Point and Rocky point PUnp I I I
station Ieprovarenta, 5.32 128,000 10,000 I 39,000 I I 250,000
I I I
hryrovemants to Bayside Drive I I
Trunk Sewer, 5-34-1,2,3 2,752,000 4,800,000 i 161,000 500,000
South Coast Trunk Sewer, Corona Del Her
P.S. to Crystal Cave P.S., 5-35 I I 2,268,000 70,000 I I 858,000
Crystal Cove Pump station, 5-36 I I 550,000 50,000 50,000
Rehabilitate Balboa Penfmula Trunk,
Lido Pulp to -'A" street, 5-27-1 I 500,000 100,000 127,000 50,000
Joint Works Equity Purchase 3,000 I
Earthquake/Flood Deimge Reserve I 155,000 I 209,000 I 256,000
Cemeo Shores Rap Station and
Extension of City Sewer to State Perk I 300,000
I
Reimbursement ABreenenta Payable I 156,000 I I 87,800
Appropriation for District Facilities I I I I
I nprovenents and Expansion I 525,000 I 225,000 I I I 75,000
._...__000 _ _ _ - 8,249,C00
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 12,591,000 19,527,000 11,643,800o
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.5 Pape 2
BUDGET RECOODNDATIONS 6/27/89
1909.90 FISCAL Tm
FUND 05 CAPITAL FACILITIES
_______________________________________ ___________ ___________ _ _________ ___________ I __-_______-
ESTIMATE9
AFFIRMED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987.88 1985-89 1988-89 1989-90
AVAILABLE FUND IN
.................
Cash B Irnastum to
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-over) 9,381,000 7,633,000 7,695,000 5,039,000
... , I 'Construction Grants 377000 16 ,000 3,600 I I ...141,000
Cwmeeti an Fees 756,000 I 6,641,000 I 6,922,000 I I 606,000
IMutrial Waste Feas 5,000 6,000 14,000 15,000
Syplesental User Fees 660,000 I 662,000 I 712,000 I I 500,000
Sale of CepecitY Rights I 223,000 I 247,000 i 2,500 240,000
Joint Works Equity Sete 425,0ON 161,000 772,000
Advenee in Aid of Conetruet lan, I0.VD 150,0ON 3,650,000 I 124,000 I 650,000
Interest 8 Nix. Receipts 614,000 725 544.000 I ,ON0- I I 206,000
----------- I ____---___ I I TAL -
SUR-T
3,210,000
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 112,591,000 f 19,527,000 116,359,100 I I 8,249,000 TOTAL
eemmw"' I :aava.ezz= I I =� e e
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.S
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND i5 BOND AND INTEREST - 1951
_______________________________________ __________ I ----------- I ----------- ' ----------- I ..-._------
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE I I BUDGET
1987.86 1985.89 1988-49 1989-90
BOND RETIREMENT pND INTEREST
............................
Principal on Bonds 20,000 25,00D I 25,000 I I 25,000
Interest on Bonds 2,365 1,746 1,746 1,059
TOTAL ----22,365 ----7.6,766 ----26,766 I 26,059
� �e=exaveee
AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE 31,646 28-254 I I 25,941
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 54,011• 55,000 52,000
AVAILABLE FUNDING I n�aa ,aazeveas_ I �ve�ena=
.................
Cash 8 Investments
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-over) 29,623 31,000 31,210 20,000
.......... .......... ........... -----------
Delinquent Taxes I 2,000
Interest 8 Mise, Receipts 2,000 I 2,000 1,263 I 2,000
----------- I ----------- ----------- I --------_._
SUB-TOTAL - 2_000- 2,000 1,263 4,000
_ ----------- ----------- --------
ANK)UH7 TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 22,388 22,000 28,000
______ ___________ __________ -----------
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 54,011 55,000 19,611 I 52,0130
Outstandim G.O. Bonds 0 6/30/89: 551,000
Final Payment Date: August, 1990
COUNTY &1MIT6TIOM DISTRICT 0.5 b/2i/W
SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT COLLECTION SISTER PROJECTS
PROJECT TOTAL C.I.P. 1909-90 IP%-91 %"1-" 1992-93 IPp3-% S-Ycer Total 1ST%-99 10-Tear Taet
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ........... .............
Cant Trutt arc.Moire
eitter Point Poop 1e(1)m to %0 1,M6,0m 150,0m 150,= III,=
lttpert int 5-31 Station.to 1,3%,
Bitter Point and Rocky Pont Pup
Station loprovmmts, S-32 (It (b)a 2a9,0m 39,00E no,DOD 250,00E ali' m
•av St. 14tk St., end Lida Pic,
Station W.I.R (3) (1) M0,= o J00,0m Cm,Om
ReMAilllete Woods Pa0)naule Fru6,
Lido Pueo to 9L•Street, 5-279 (1) (a) VpOm 12I,m0 50,0m 50,00E S0,m0
leprovavReo to Roy Sr)doa
plop station, 5-A (11 ( ) 1,6n. m O9,m0 0m,m0 0m,m0 1,6Go,m0 I.",=
tepre.ta to OTido Drlve
T,vik sdswr, 5.3E-1,2,5 (2) (b) 4,%l,m0 161,000 3m,m0 2,mD,mO 2,500,000 C,am,Om 6,0m,Om
Meat Coerce HI oy Oraity
T, Reheat tetra (3) (C) 3,2DO,mD =,0m I.M,Om 2,0110,001ol I,%O,Om 3.2m,Om
gig convert Trunk Rebeb)1)tet)en (3) (c) 1,504,00D O I' m,= 1,5m,006
CwtH Cast Trull Sorer Corona OIL Mot P.S.to Crystal Cove P.S., f-A (2) (b)o• 3,6m,m0 n.000 ".Coo 2,000,E011 1,000,00 3.M0,m0 3,6m.0m Cryatel Cove Poop Station, S-36 (2) (b)•• 1,1m,m0 50,000 SO,= 500,01111 500,Om I,MO,mO 1,030.m0
x)sallnneouc Projects (a) no'coo 15,m0 2S,0m n,Om T5.0m A,Om 30S,m0 SiS,mO Dm,Om
GRAND TMSL 1...2.,m0 .........v ....,0m. :..co.. ..e...0m. .. 2miSvOm. .:,STS,mp 1>:OAv®®v ®.NS�mO ti®�.m0
_• •• ..m .. vsv a .. • • msv vv m v v msv m
(U Fully Fstlad 1. Noater-piomsd ivc)11tin presently udir canatratim
(c) der"In
0. Forceappautlad 3. MenHe tor-Pltmeetl trciltNn opNeAtled far future desiWeumtratlen
m Poitl al ysrid by Dlatrlct Ma.6
OENTT CANITATIE DISTRICT NO. 5 6/21/0
FISSCX TRANSA 1 89-90 TXERGIIANI iFLOW
" Rye 1
LINE 1989-90 19E-91 1901-92 1992-93 19D1-95 5-Year tObl 1995-99 10-Tyr Tatel lly
.... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ............ ........... ............. ....
OPERATING IUy .5.00 iSs.N f]6.00 f110.N S150.N IRSS.E
.............i ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ...........
1 Rnervn 8 Carrv-Over I.Lest Tear 3,426,a00 .,NO,ND .,30,0E J15921ON 3,92710E 3,4M,OE .,421,EO 3,y6,EO 1
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
REYEpIE
2 9hera of ti lu Atle9atin 2,32S,000 2,SM,NO 2,730,0E 2,958,ON 3,MS,NO 13,730,0E 20,5/5,000 3.,
3 Fees: IMutrlel Waste lo1,000 116,ON 13S,OE 15410E In EO 682,0E 1,320,0E zy
SL6plemneel Waer 64,0E 1,.4,0E 1,961,0E 2,BSB,NO 3,921,0E 10,880,0E M,892,OE 32 IEO l
5 Interest 6 Xiazal lmllwle 1.. 265,0E 293,0E 2.8,0E 268,0E Ey,EO 1,603,0E 2,OS,EO S;W;EO
6 Other Rwvare 0 0 6
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
] TOTAL REVENUE S,l.0,N0 5,519,ON S,tE,OE 6,238,0E 7,E1,N0 3,101,0E 52,60110E 79.5%,E0 7
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
e 1CTAl AVAIUOLE fUNDIN4 6,.66,0E 81.4,0E 9,355,0E 9,83010E 11,5MIEO JO,IMIEO ..,222,E0 .......... 8
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
EXPFy1I106S
11 9 Share of joinlon t wTm IF S 0 2,OM,EO 2,360,0E 2,631,0E 2,69],EO 3,]0]8S2522,E0 12,.38,0E M,IWIOE N,09p3�2q'Spwpo0p 88
Oesar EXputliturnS f O eM Other (per. 69010E 1,200,0E 3,5002;OSEE 2,.00;OONO J,Se0000 2;SW;0� 35;COO;GW 30;SOO;e00 11
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
12 TEAL EXPEy11EE5 2,.16,000 5,219,0E 5,]bl,EO S,B53,000
revmn .... ........ ........... ........... ........... . 251E1E y,6E,E0 .R...,3.16.,�.= 12
......... ......... .........
ua'. eiSFfYRa 4,05
2 60 3500152 ;� { E14 ; ;11 2;020 2, 00 ,.ES
t YerDryPra0Mng ln 15800 0000 1E 927, 790 , 9 S7; 11O
........ ......... ....... ......... ...... ....... ......... .........
15 fu,6lialarce or (Deficit) 2,M.0co 2, 4O,OE ]IO,EO 1,050,Ea E2,E0 842,0(0 S,E71OE 31E71E0 15
CAPITAL IMCS)
16 Ryervn f Carry-over Irmo Last Year 5,E9,E0 766,0E ......,E0 .,110,N0 ....I,N0 ......E0 13,6.5,0E 3,04,.E /6
REVENUE
17 Corotrtetin Orylte 141,E0 yyI 161,0E �31g4liccce 17
19 Sent Inbrtrtal Waste °15;00 71i,m Eo m 0:00000 SM;WO 31m;m 5 22u,m 81]OS;EO 19
20 Stpplemntet User 500,000 560,0E 5]1Ey,EO M
22 Interest 60N mallep0neir IEye 2M.080 459;OS00 522;9w 21
3
026; 0
0 s" CO* 1;553;= E,2255;m 4;WB;EESO 2221
M Ot6er Inane 1,SM,000 26,360,0E 1,SE,ON 10,060,0E i],G22,OE N,An:= 22
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
24 TOTAL REVERVE 3,210,000 22,19310E 2,Ml,OE 1,BS1,N0 19,613,0E 55,3.010E 8,295,E0 M'Simi1E0 26
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ... ....... ...........
25 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 8,249,000 28,55.,0E I4,4.I,000 5,961,E0 21,SS7'M 60,329,0E 21,938,0E E,6n,E0 M
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
EXPENDITURES
26 GDere of Joint Worse Treatment Plnt 5,260,000 .,3118,0E 6,303,0E 3,9]S,NO 2,BM,D00 25,.31,0E 12,603,0E JB,SS.,OJO 26
22 District Collection "One 2,225,0E 5,625,0E 3,e75,NO 275,NO 1,875,ND 13,825,0E 3,615,0E 11 11 77 55 00.ENO E'/
M Reiebureeaen[ Agreement Payments 14,N0 tE,000 109 EO M
29 Ot6er Expenditures S,EO,OE 3,ON,NO 7,ON,ON 7,ON;DE M
E IOTA. EXPENDITURES ],<85,ON 16,933,ON 10,367,N0 41247,E0 2,M3,000 46,235,0E 16,2.,0E 63,60310E 30
........... ........... ........... ........... ".... ........... ........... ...........
31 Reserves 8 Carry-aver to Next Year 7.,0E 11,624,0E 4,110,000 .....,N 13,"4
0 1] ..,NO 131.4,0E 660 5,660,0E 5, ,0E 31
SIATENENT Of PROJECIEO CASH ILON PERT, 2
FISCAL TEAM 1909.90 THROWN 1998-99
LINE 1989-90 1990.91 1991-02 1992-93 1E93. . .
9{ S-TT,A Io A 1994-W 10-Year IOtat LINE
.--. ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ...... ..... ........... -_-___. ..... LIKE
BOND NND(6)
------------
32 Raearvea A Cony-006F Irani Lest year x0,000 26,000 0 0 0 ED,= 0 20,00D 32
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
PEW"
33 iu Leeww SD,000 30,000 30,ON m
34 IntereAt 8 Nlecellereoue 1.. 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 0 3,000 x
35 Other Ineam 0 35
36 lOfAl PE9ENUE 32,..E 0 0 0 0 .2,... 0 32,000 M
37 TOTAL AVAILABLE fuxO1N0 .S2,0110..... 26,0.. 0 0 0 52,..E 0 52,000 37
F%IEMDIlME6
Se Batl 9rircipl L Interest 26,OOD 26,OD0 52,000 52,000 H
39 Other ENpenJlturea 39
40 TOTAL EkPEMD1iWF4 26,..E ...... 0 0 0 52,000 0 52,--- {0
pyr .....7y....pp.. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .......••__
42 RNLIt Text's Dry 9et1 o0tpurvilM RWYlremmt6 26,01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
43 heel Mt.. or MAHAl ) Eve®®eO 0 O. ®�o� YOY.. 0 ....WYO 0. v� v0 0 {3
SUNIMY (A0Jest06 fer IMar-FEW Iraesfera)
N ROeareee 6 COrry-ONer I. Lut YET,, 8,4L5,00D 4,8{0,000 15,8)4,OOD 7,ri2,OW 3,691,000 0,{BS,000 10,065,000 B,f85,000 4f
fS TOTAL REVENUE 6,382,OD0 32,212,000 ],958,000 B4OB9,000 2],23l,000 U'Dis 000 61„000 1N,1]0,000 45
........... ........... ........... ........... 27:M..... .........-. ........... ....6.5.....E
46 FOUL AVAILABLE FUNDING 15,06],DDO 3),052,000 21,812,000 15,791,000 32,92S,OOD 90,ShD,000 N, 60•WO 13��3 S'm l]4] TOTAL E%IE4DI TUREY 10,227.ON 21,178,000 16,130,000 t0,t00,END 14,860,00D 72,495,000 N, OOD
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
48 beerueE L Cerry-OJer to Nut Year 4,UD On 15,0]4,000 ],702,OOD 3,691,000 18,065,000 18,065,000 14, 4,000 14,2ri,000 W
49 Meat Year•T, Dry Par100 FatlIM Reaulreeente I,38S,OOD 2,Ito,= 2,802,OOD 2,927,000 S,S79,000 3,579,000 f, ],000 S,S47,000 49
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... . . . . .........
30 fY4D BALANCE OR (DEFICIT) 5,456,000 1],]64,OOD 4,820,000 2,764,000 14,486,000 14,456,000 1,72].00D 11,7127.000 SO
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
PNaTATIOAN
A 9 epolitaa 0r GIs,
e(i C)
Since 195t'
oggNGE CCU
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
COWTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 6/22/89
"GET RECOMMENDATIONS Page 1
1989-M FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT N6 SIMMORY
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I
APPROVED APPROVED I RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I "GET BUDGET I "GET
1988-89 1988-s9 I 1989-90
--------------------------------------- I ----------- ----------- I ----------- I
REQUIREMENTS
____-___-___ I I I
I I I
OplFati DB d C- - qu Reitemmts
- ---
I I I I
DpeteciDM Futl I 3,549,000 I 3,780,000 I 5,552,000 I
I I I I
Capital Facilities Fud I 8,826,000
--------- I --------- •I ---------
SUB-TOTAL OPERATING d CAPITAL 112,737,000 112,084,000 114,378,000
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I
I I I
Debt Reti repent I I I
I I I
Bond enC Interest FOtl - 1931 I -27,439
----- •I I
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 112,764,439 112,084,000 14,378,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ND. 6 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Page 2
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT k6 SUMMARY
--------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
I I I
I APPROVED I APPROVED I RECOMMENDED
OESCRIPTI ON OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET BUDGET
1988-89 I 1988-89 1989-90
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- ----------- I
I I
FUNDING I I
I I
Operating 8 Capital Fundil-
I I I
cash 8 Investments (Apprgpri eted I I I I
Reserves and Carry-Over) 7,320,000 I 7,810,000 I 9,267,000
I I I
Other Revenue I 6,320,000 vl 3,164,000 •I 3,883,000 I
I I I I
Anticipated Tex A(lDceti on I I I I
From 1% Lew 11,095,000 11,110,000 I 1,228,000 I .
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I
SUB-TOTAL OPERATING 8 CAPITAL 112,735,000 112,084,000 114,378,000
----------- I ----------- I ...........
I I I i
Debt Retlragent I I I I
............... I I I I
I I I I
Cash 8 ImNtnsnes tAppreprlatsd
Reserves 8 Corry-Over) I 29,439
I I I
Other Revenue I I I I
I i I I
aaoDnt Raised by iaxw for I I I I
Debt ObLiptlan I I I I
----------- I ----------- I -----------
SUB-TOTAL DEBT RETIREMENT I 29,439 I 0 1 0 1
........... I ----------- I ...........
TOTAL FUNDING 112,764,439 112,084,000 114,378,000
I �®vvvvnevv I _�v=®==oov I eve®. I
-Adjusted for Inter-Fad Transfers
ODDITY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.6 Page 1
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989.90 PISUL YEAR
FUND M6 OPERA71HO
....................................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTWL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987_88 1986.89 1988-89 1989_90
_____________________________ ________ ___________ -----------
OPERATING
Directors- Pees 6,500 7,500 7,200 7,500
Sery
Coces
ntractual Joint iOperating I 1,791,000 2,050,000 I 1,706,000 I 2,587,000
Trunk Maintenance 35,000 I 50,000 8,g00 I 40,000
mp Pu Station Maintenance 25,000 25,000 25,800 35,000
Permit and Ind. Waste Admin. 20,000 30,000 29,800 35,000
Admin.Cannectim Fee Sentl Collectionpenu ' 38,410
12,100 I 58,100 39.100
Tax/Pee Collection Expense 6,000 6,900 7,900 8,300
Treas"Or'S Inveatment Ach.
& Banking Fees 5,000 8,000 5,800 4,800
UN litiec 1,750 10,800 13,600 I 19,000
User Pee Expense 5,000 12,000 10,000 50,000
Profess{ansL Services 4 5,000 I 5,000 I 1,300 I 5,000
Printing And Publication I 1,000 I 1,000 .I 1,000
Travel & Meeting - Directore 250 200 200 200
Uncollectibie Aeeounte I 1,000 ' 1,000 I 1,000
........... I ........... ........... --_--__--__
TOTAL OPERATING 1,941,000 2,220,000 1,874,500 2,833,000
----------- i ___--_-___- I i .-----__---
NON-OPERATING
Interest 50,000
Expenses Applicabte to Prior Years I 3,000 3,000 1,100 I 3,000
----------- ----------- I I -------___-
TOTAL NON-OPERATING -• 3,000- -• 3000 i 1,100 I I 53_OOD
TOTAL OPERATING & NON-OPERATING 1,944,000 2,223,000 1,875,600 2,886,000
RESERVES --- I -••--,••••-
Appropriation for Contingencies 633,000 445,000 I 1,223,000
Authorized General Reserve I 972,000 ......... 1,443,000
---------
TOTAL RESERVES 1,605,000 1,557,000 0 2,666,000
__-- ------ .......
-----------
TOTAL REOUIRENENTS 3,549,000 3,780,000 1,675,600 5,552,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 Page 2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/19/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 96 OPERATING
....................................... ........... ........... ........... ........... .........
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET ENPENDI TUBE BUDGET
1987.88 1988.89 1988.89 1989.90
....................................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
AVAILABLE FUNDING
-----------------
Cash G Investmonts
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-Over) 2,195,000 1,580,000 1,270,100 1,969,000
----------- ----------- ----------- -..------
Fees 9Q000 139,000 104.200 114,000
Supplemental User Fees 800,000 984,400 2,077,000
Interest 8 Misc. Receipts 135,000 111,000 178,600 164,000
Delinquent Taxes 34,000 40,000 49,600 61,000
----------- ----------- ----------- -----"'---
SUB-TOTAL 259,000 1,090,000 1,316,800 2,416,000
........... ........... .........1. ...........
Tax Alloeatfon 1,081,000 1,081,000 1,060,000 1,142,000
Subventions 14,000 29,000 27,400 25,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
SUB-TOTAL 1,095,000 1,110,000 1,087,400 1,167,000
----------- ----------- ----------- .._..__....
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 3,549,000 3,780,000 3,674,300 5,552,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 PaOa 1
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND A•6 CAPITAL FACILITIES
_______________________________________ ___________ __________ ----------- ----------- I ------...__
ESTIMATED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I APPROVED
APPROVED
ACTUAL RE
EXPENDITURE I BUDGET
1987-W 1988-89 1988-89 I I 1%9-90
------------------------------
PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES
Treatment Plant Expansion I 2,946,000 4,711,000 I 2,966,000 I 4,962,000
Appropriation for Master-Planned I I I I
Treatment Plant Facilities I 2,973,000
Master Plan/EIR Update I 40,000 I 40,000 I
Radio Linked Telemetry System I 10,000 I 10,000
Coact Trunk Force Maine I I I I
Newport Blvd. to Back Bay and
Santa Ana River to Bitter Point I I I I
Pulp Station, S-29 I 278,000 I 368,000 349,000
Bitter Point Purp Station
to Newport Blvd., 5-31 I 17,000 I 90,000 74,000 I 10,000
Bitter Point and Rocky Point Punp I
Station Improvements, 5-32 27,000 25,000 3,000 I 200,000
Baker-Gisler Interceptor 14.1.1 (A) 1,270,000 1,337,000 50,000 1,250,000
Baker-Gisler Interceptor 14.1.1 (e) 50,000 750,000
Rocky Point to Newport Blvd.
(South Side) 9D,000
Fairview Relief, Baker Street
to Nilson Street, 6-12 1,034,000 1,491,OOD 30,000 327,000
Joint Works Faulty Purchase 585,000
Earthquake/Flood Damage Reserve 153,000 199,000 242,000
I
Appropriation I for District
Facilities Improvements and
Expansion I 350,000 I 33,000 500,000
I ---------- .
TOTAL REGUIREMENTS I 9,188,000 8,304,000 3,522,000 8,826,000
........... I ....... I =......,... .m....:_
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 Page 2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND $16 CAPITAL FACILITIES
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- ___________ ___________
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE I BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90
_____ ____ _ __________________________ I I I
AVAILABLE FUNDING I ___________ ___________ I ----- i ___________ I -----------
_________________ I I I I
Cash 6 Investments
(Appropriated Reserves and I I I
Carry-over) I 5,125,000 I 6,230,000 7,280,100 I I 7,298,000
I --••------ ---------- ----------- I I ------_.---
Construction Grants I 37c,000 136,000 3,400 I I 133,000
I I I I
connection Fees I 768,000 I 250,000 1,167,000 I I 7e2,000
Industrial Waste Fees I 38,000 I 60,080 45,000 I I 50,000
Supplemental User Fees I 1,160,000 I 534,000 656,000 I I
I I I I
Sale of Capacity Rights I 222,000 I 242,000 I I I 226,000
I I
.Join[ Works Equity Sete I 1,104,000 I 548,000 I 818,000 I I
Interest and Misc. Receipts I 395,000 I 304,000 599,000 337,000
----------- I ___________ ___________ I I ___________
SUB-TOTAL I 4,061,000 2,074,000 3,288,400 I 1,528,000
----------- ----------- I _________--
Transfer from Bond Fund I 2,000 I I I
--•----- -- I ----------- _ I I ___________
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING I 9,188,000 I 8,304,000 10,568,500 I I 8,826,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6127/89
1989.90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 06 BOND AND INTEREST - 1951
....................................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1967.88 1988.89 1988-89 1989-90
....................................... ........... ........... I -...-...... ..--.-..... ...........
BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST
............................
Principal on Bonds 27,000
Interest on Bonds 439
TOTAL 27,439 0 0 D
AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE
Transfer to ADO Fund 2,000 267 0
TOTAL REOUI RENENTS vvmv,vvvv I evvvvvv... ......6® -----_ -0-
v
AVAILABLE FUNDING
Cash S ImostmBnts
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-over) 29,439 51
........... ........... ........... -----------
Delinquent Tex" I 200
Interest 8 Misc. Receipts I ..----16
........... ........... ...........
SUBTOTAL 0 0 216 0
........... ........... ........... ...........
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES '
----------- ----------- ----------- ...........
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING I __ _29_439 7 e......... vuum "ev"ev v
COUNTY IRRITATION DISTRICT 0.6 Any"
SCMEINLE DE DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS
PROJECT ... ... ...
TOTAL C.I.P. 1939.% 1DE0-91.. 1DE1.92 1992-95 IDES-%.. 5-Year Tobl 1994-99 10-Y. Total
-.......... ..... ........ ........... ......... ........... ........... ......... ............ ........... .............
Cwrt Trunk TOM*Moire
Sitter Point Pmp Station to
Me.port 6ked.15-31 (1) tea e4,om ri,om To,om 10,Om 10,DDo
Sitter Point Old Rocky Paint hop
USTi. lopravumu, 5.32 (1) (a)a 2o3.000 3,000 200,om 2m,Om 20o,Om
Rehabilitate Beet coast Mi96wv
Dre.ily sever (3) (e) 1,00.000 50.000 6m.m0 650,om Aao,om 1,001Om
Alcides Trusts Rebabitil.d. (3) (c) 2,02s,mo 25,00 25,M 2,mo,Om 2,023,0oo
Baker-Dis(or Interceptor•• 14.1-1(a) (2) (a) 1,3m,m0 so,coo 250,Om no,0m 250,OW 1125010011 1,25o,mo
Baker-SlSLer Entertainer— 14.1-l(b) (2) (a) wo,000 $0,00 500,00) no,000 25D,000 no,o0D
reir.la.Aalief, Asks. SRxt
m Bitten Street (6-12) (3) (b) 2,7401040 50,WD 400,0410 BO,mU 2,300,000 2,150,0co
Obtricl Ma.6 Trunk /...List (3) (c) I,SOO,000 0 1,Sm,000 1,50o,o0D
Miscallamaw P.oi..fe (n soo,000 so,Dm so,mo To,= so,om so,Doo Mo,am no,om sm,om
SMMD i01A1 10,x12,o00 1T2,om 1,060,Om 1,m0 — ........ 100,000 1,OSO,mO 3,SB3,00o 6,450,Om tO,mS,mO
(S) MIT 1uMN 1. Muter-ptened facititl.. pcaamtly under mntroction
(bI Port Our rudM 2. Meaterplervwd le[l lino presonTly under design
(p xoI fuMM 3. 14ate.-plemM fecllities ¢hemle6 for future MlpNcwutructian
Partistly Paid by Dletri Ct 5
•• Pertfetly Mid by Di...Itn 2 and 11
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 6/22/69
STATIONERY Of PROJECTED CASH FLOW PARR 1
F ISUL YEARS 1999-90 THROUGH 19911-99
LINE 1989-90 1990-91 1991.92 19P2.93 1993-K S-YHr lOtel 1M4•H 10-YHr loNl LIE
--.. .111 0 .ISOM .....00 ....... ....... ............ ........... ............. ....
OPFrT1x0 fGNO K9.N i60.N ....... SIIS.N f1N.N B3(B.N
.............. -...... .....-- ....... ...-... -.-.... ...........
1 eerrns d Carry-der irm Lrt THr 1,969,ON 2,666,0ro J,019,000 3,1)0,000 4,SOOr= 1,969,N0 S,S92,000 1,969,OOD 1
........... ........... .1......... ........--- ----------- ........... ........... ...........
eEENDE
2 Share of l%IN Allocation 1,228,000 1,326,000 1,4n.ON 1,Say am 1,6)1,000 ).�.� 10 W,000 2,31m4 000 2 J 1.! ladntriel Wete 114,N0 131,00 151.ON 1)3,OW 1 .ON
4 S�aleeec[el user 2,an,NO 3,419,00D 5,120,ON I'm m 6,1 000 22,6K, K;)49;000 S);N2;ON 4
5 Interest 6 Niscalle"or I.. 164,D00 202,000 2a,D00 zn:m 3K;000 1,230,N0 1,9115,000 3,2u,m s
6 Other RevaNue U 0 6
) TOTAL REVENUE 3,S81,DN 5,0)B4ON 6,980.N0 ),862,ON 9,35),NO )1,KO,NO N,M,= N,225.ON )
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
8 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING S,552,000 ),)44,DN 9,9H,N0 11,20,000 12,BS2,000 33,829,N0 K,N),ON B2,6K,ON a
..... . .. . ...... . ...........
ER9EE11UES
9 Shere of Joint Warks Il d 0 2,58),NO 2,91519,ODo 3,33365,000 3,483,ON 3,985,000 %,399,000 30,413,000 46 812,000 9
oco To
10 Ca1lHtion S�t M 6 0 and Other Oyer. �•� {50;000 2,900;ONO'S 2,900,000 2,900 000 10,0001 150 Goo 141: 00 000 24;65 ,m 11
11 Other Expert turea -- . . - 1, . .. - - ...........12 TOTAL ENPERDIIUAES 2,886,ON t,T25,ON 6,621,ON 6,)40,ON ),265,ON u,n),000 41,2N,0N )S,4ES,ON 12
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
I3 Haerne d Carry-der 10 Next Year 2,666,DN 3.019,000 J,AB,ON SIMON SIM,= 5,S92,ON ).2H,0N ),2N,ODD 13
I4 Beat Years Dry Period Furellne RaTUref is 1,44J,000 2„000 J,311,N0 3, 20,000 3,03,000 ] IND 5,6J1,ON 5,631,00D 14
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
IS Fucl Belmce ar (De/100 1,223,000 6K,000 6).ON 1,00,000 1,959,ON 1,959,000 1.RB,OH 1,S28,000 15
uPltAl FurotsS
16 ReHrns d Carry-Her irm Last Year TI
MING . . 21,090,001). ... ... .. ... . A,K2,ON 16.1J3.... . I4 2..... ... ,)K,NO , 6
------- 1
EEMIE
17 0ren[s in:DN In,= 133,END 17
Ill ISM: Camectlm TEE GOD 820,0r 860,000 901.000 94),0011 4,310,000 S,SN,000 9.810,000 10
19 IMetriel ..Is 50,ND So,= D6,ON 76,000 87,000 3D,000 629,000 1,016,000 19
20 S[gplmHtel User 0 0 20
21 Sela N CepcitY Rights 226.00D III,= 20,0N TIES No 220,ON I.362,000 259,000 1,621,000 21
22 Intern[ d Nlscellenms 1.. 33),000 826,000 1,3S2,ON 1,1)6,000 1,095.000 4,)86,000 3,205,ON ),9DI.NG 22
23 Other W. 29,000,000 29,NO,ON N,000,N0 23
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
24 TOTAL REVENUE 1.52/,000 30,815.00D 2.298,N0 2,938,ON 2.349,mo ]9,928,000 9.f43.ON 49,571,N0 24
25 TOTAL AVAILED LE fUNDIN4 /,OK,DN )],OK,000 23,3N,N0 19,9N,... .......... .........0 ......,NO ...... 5
FNPEIDIlUES ,
M Aen e/ blot rrks lrrtmMt Plant 4,962,N0 DID%,= 6,021,ON 3,)4),001D 2,666Np N0 24,22gq22,OSO 12,028,0N K,320,N0 26
27 District Collection Systems 1,ON,ON 1,ME,= MICRO 100,000 1, ,800 S,S85.000 6,450,eN 10,0]5,000 27
28 Other EapertllturH K5•NO 4,ON,000 4,585,000 4,SBS.ON ZB
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
29 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,N),NO 11,HG,NO 6,1A6,ON 3,57,000 3,718,00 ]2,462,000 18,528,on SD,990,ON M
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
10 Rw<raes L C.,.. mr H xHt Year 2,219,ON 21,090.ON 17,W,ON 16,133.ON 14,7K,NO 14,764,000 S,829,N0 5,8T9.00D 30
COUNTY SM17ATIN DISTRICT ND. 6
FISCAL FEARS THROUENN 1i9W 99
LINE 1909.90 IM-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 5-Txr TM.L 1994-99 WSW Total. LIVE........ ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ............ ........... ............. ....
BOND I=($)
31 Rmerves 6 Cerry-Over From Lest Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
REVENUE 3�
33 Ln e=0 FIT...It. 1.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33
34 other 1. 0 ]{
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
35 tOlAl REVENUE ........�. ........�. ........�. ........�. ........�. ........�. ........�. ........_0 75
36 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUMING ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........0 X
ENmNDITwas
38 OOtthehervEtpardDltwaenteru[ 0 0 38
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
39 TOTAL EXNW170ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39
40 Rmermv A Cerry-Mir t0 Neat Year 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 {0
41 Mext Temp Dry 9erlDtl iudlnl Rpuirmmta 0 0 0 D 0 0 V 0 41
42 Fvtl Belerce or (Deficit) ......... 0. .......mve. m..m..vv ....mvvmQv ....vemm0 0 .®mm.e 42
swes0tY (A6jmtM Inter-Fund Inter-Fu Truufers) v ®®
43 Reserves 6 terry-Owr item Last Year 9,26T,D00 4,805.000 29;]0;00 30;800 000 30,633,00000 91;i69;OW 3B 560;ODO 110;]%;000 N Q TOTAL REVENUE 5,111,000 35,691,
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 01 O's..... .......�.... ...........
45 TOTAL AVAILABLE FNXOINS 19,39a,000 40,998,000 33,]0T,000 31,290,000 31,ll9,000 B?.:T,OOD IB1%,0400 156,635,81 ae 46 TOTAL ExOEx01N0.E5 .....!000 16,669,000 12,969,000 -----I.... lo,m......,000 60,699,...00D ... ..0 .S GOD
.......Wal 9,001) ........... ....1 111 ......--... ........... ...........
49 seat Year'sCDryyPe Io6ti�mJlM Require enta 1;443;0W t;Ibl;wO 21;I11;0aw 23,33TO;OW 23;633;000 23]633;OOD 15.011,400 13;W1;0� 40
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
49 FUND BALANCE OR (DEFICIT) v:4:v:.0p0..v 21.eb 000 :::W OOOv 11,263,000. ::']23,:00 :®'TLI,::Dv 7,4vmv1,0cm :®:1� 49
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
�N/TATION
°lit°n Oro O�S)'p
°a
e
U m o V
h = w
+ f
�AgNGE Co�N
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Page 1
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT N7 SUMMARY
....................................... ........... I ----------- I ___-____-_-
APPROVED APPROVED RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 1989-90
....................................... ........... I ----------- I -----------
REQUIREMENTS
............
Operating B Capital Requirements
Operating Fund 8,048,000 10,855,000 11,262,000
25,083,000
Capital Facilities Fund ---------- ---------- ----------
SUBTOTAL OPERATING & CAPITAL 39,172,000 40,028,000 36,345,000
___________ ___________ I -----------
Debt Retirement
Boyd and Interest Fund - 1951 29,533 14,193
Bond and Interest Fund - 1962 844,487 664,000 507,112
Bontl antl Interest Fund - 1970 335,888
------- ------- -------
SUB-TOTAL RETIREMENT 1,869,358 1,363,193 843,000
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 41,041,358 41,391,193 37,183,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Page 2
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT #7 SUMMARY
....................................... I ----------- I ----------- I ----------. f
APPROVED APPROVED RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 1969-90
--------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
FUNDING
Operating 4 Capi tat Fund----- --
Cash 8 Investments (Appropriated
Reserves and Carry-Over) 32,417,000 32,609,000 27,805,000
Other Revenue 3,870.000 3,653,000 4,580,000
Anticipat e6 Tan Allocation
Fran 1% Levy 2,=,BOB 3,566,000 3,%0.000
........... ........... I ........... f
SUBTOTAL OPERATING 4 CAPITAL 39,172,000 40,028,000 36,345,000
----------- I ----------- -----------
Debt Retirement
cash 8 Investments (Appropriated
Reserves 8 Carry-Over) 1,761,358 1,289,193 805,000
Other Revenue 108,000 74,000 38,000
Amount RaiseE by Taxes for
Debt Obligation
----------- I ........... I ..--.------
SUB-TOTAL DEBT RETIREMENT 1,869,358 1,363,193 $43,000
........... I ........... I .--..-.----
TOTAL FUNDING 41,041,358 41,391,193 37,188,000
"r
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.7 Pao* 1
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/69
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND A7 OPERATING
--------------------'---------......... ----------- ----------- I ----------- ----------- -----------
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90
----- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..........
OPERATING
DirectorPs Fee 10,500 12,000 9,600 12,000
Contractual Services I 1
Share of Joint Operating 2,335,000 2,749,000 i 2,393,000 I 1 3,638,000
Trunk Maintensnce I 420,000 I 3" 000 I 291,400 I 395,000
Manhole 6 Line Repairs 50,000 50,000 50,000
Pump Station Maintenance 250,000 297,000 279,800 310,000
Permit and Intl. Waste Ada. I 126,000 126,000 I 120,700 150,000
Coraarction Fee AdlPin. 25,000 2s,000 23,000 97,000
Inter-Dist. Seger Use Chg. 1,800 2,000 1,eoo 2,000
Bontl Collection Expense 100 100 100
Tax Cottecti or, Expense 7,100 10,600 8,600 9,400
Treasurer's IraiMtment Adm.
A Banking Fans 20,000 35,000 I 24,000 ' 20,000
Utilities I 75,000 j 65,000 129,900 I I 140,000
User Fee Expense , I 13,900 1 5,400
Professi ores I Services I 20,000 15,000 I 34,100 1 I 25,000
Printing and Publication 2,000 1,300 1 2,800 1 I 3,000
Travel and Mtg. - Directors 500 500 I 300 I 800
I
uncollectible Accounts ---- 21300
-000- I ......
...1 500 I I ..........
TOTAL OPERATING 3,345,000 I 3,785,000 -3,332,900 1 4,859,000
.....
NON-OPERATING
-- ---Interest I 2,000 68,000 114,700 i i 161,000
Expenses Applicable to Prior Years I 1,000 1,000 32,300 1 I 1,000
.TOTAL NON-OPERATING ---_-3,00p --•69,000 •147,000- I -- 162,000
TOTAL OPERATING A NON-OPERATING 3,348,000 3,854,000 3,479,900 5,021,000
----------- ----------- I ........... I I -----------
RESERVES
--Appropriation for Contingencies I' 3,026,NO 5,074,OD0 , 1 ' 3,772,000
I
Authorized General Reserve I 1,676,000 1 1,927,000 I I - -------
TOTAL RESERVES I 4,700,000 I 7,001,000 0 6,241,000
I - --.------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 8,048,000 10,855,000 1 3,479,900 11,262,000
,....o..„ .........v. ........:.. I I .---------
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ND.7 Page 2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/22/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND #7 OPERATING
-------------------------------------- -- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
ESTIMATE
APPROVE I APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET I BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987-88 I 1988-89 I 1988-89 I I 1989-90
-----------------------------------•--- ... I ------
AVAILABLE FUNDING
----------------- I I I I
Cash 8 Investments
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-Over) 4,522,0E I 6,262,0E 5,785,500 I I 6,482,000
.......... ........... ........... ---_--.----
Fees 230,0E 435,000 333,5E 366,000
I I I
Interest 8 Misc. Receipts _ 327,0E I 470,000 i 640,800 i i 454,000
Delinquent Taxes 84,0E 122,0DO I 150,000 I I 186,000
.-...... I ........... I I -----------
SUB-TOTAL 641,0E 1,027,ODO I 1,124,300 I 1,006,000
I ----------- ----------- I ._......... I .----------
Tax Altocatioe I 2,634,0E 3,286,Eo j 3,206,500 j j 3,455,0E
I I I I I
Rs Agency Tax
Agen Tax Pa I I I
Pass-Thros-Through 182,0E 192,000 I 240,300 I I 245,000
I I I
Subventions I 74,000
...........690E ------ I ------ I I ------
SUB-TOTAL I 2,885,000 j 3,566,0E j 3,529,700 i j 3,774,000
- I ----------- I I --•--------
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 8,048,000 110,855,0E 10,439,500 I 111,262,0E
COUNTY BAN ITATION DISTRICT NO.7 Pale 1
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/09
1989.90 FISCAL YEAR
R= R CAPITAL FACILITIES
---'----'---------'---------"•'---'•'- I •---------- --'------ - ---------'
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROY® ACIWLL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BLOW BUCKET EXPENDITURE MGFT'
1967.88 198E-89 IM-89 19E9.90
................ ..................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES
-------------------------
Treatmcnt Plant Expansion 3,485,000 6,126,000 I 4,029,000 I 7,026,000
Appropriation for Master-Planned I
treatment Plant Facilities 20,838,000 14,502,000
Radio Linked Telemetry System I 125,000 125,000 I
Master Ptan/E1R Update 55,000 35,000
I
Allocation for Local Severs 7,150,000
Orange Perk Acres Bauer Installment
Purchases 133,000 60,000 144,000
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, 14-1-1A,B 1,307,000 I 2,201,000 120,NO I 5,200,000
Baker-Gisler Force Mains, 14-1-2 I 534,000 I 899,000 I 49,OOD 2,100,000
I I I
Pump station Modifications, 7-11 I 120,000 I 1,289,000 I 71,000 I I 904,000
I
MCGau Subtrunk Parallel I 400,000 I 400,000
MCGaM Lift station j 200,000 j 200,000
I I
Campus Relief B,Atrunk I 550,000 550,000 I
I
main Street v,mp Station I 20,000 I
Airport Diversion (South), 7-10-1 I 650,000 650,000 I 692,000
I
Airport Diversion (North) I 650,000 I I I
I I
Tustin-Orange Reaches 17 and 18 I 600,000 600,000
Michelson Relief Subtrunk I 550,000
I
Joint Works Equity Purchase I 28,000 878,000 I 1,482,000 I I 1,867,oat
Earthquake/Flood Damage Reserve I 181,000 255,000 342,000
I
Appropriation for District Facilities I I I I
Improvements and Expansion 700,000 I 400,000 175,000 350,000
----------- I I --------- - I ----------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 131,124,000 129,173,000 I 6,618,000 125,083,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 Page 2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 97 CAPITAL FACILITIES
--------------------------------------- ----------- ----•------ - - -- ---------- -----------
EST
APPROVED pPPgOVm ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET ENPENDITINO BUDGET
1987-88 198E-89 1985-89 1989-90
...........
AVAILABLE FUND INS ----- ----
--Cash S IUriestnents
(ApproprWas! Reserves and
Carry-over) 27,895,000 26,347,000 25,937,000 21,323,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
Construction Grants 442,000 177,000 4,500 188,000
CaesOctim Fees j 500,000 500,000 j 545,OOD i j 1,940,000
Irsintrial Waste Fees 92,000 I 177,000 136,000 150,000.
Sale of Capacity Rights 262,ODD I 292.000 7,400 321,000
Amexct ion Fees 23,000
Interest and Misc. Receipts 1,933,000 1,680,000 2,129,000 1,161,000
Transfer from 1951 NOW Ftad I I -- 1,796
----------- ---------- •• -----------
SUB-TOTAL 3,229,000 2,826,000- 2,846,696- I I 3,760,000
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 31,124,000 29,173,000 28,793,696 25,083,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND R BOND AND INTEREST - 1951
_______________________________________ _ _ __ I ___________ _ _ _ I ----------- I -----------_--__ _ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET MIDGET EXPENDITURE I BUDGET
1987-85 198E-89 1988.89 1989-90
BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST
----------------------------
Principal on Bads 14,000 14,000 14,000
Interest on Bads 578 193 32
........... ........... ........... _____-_____
TOTAL 14,578 14,193 1f,032 0
Transfer to Capital Facilities Fund I � 1,7%
AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE 14,955
___________
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 29,533 14,193 15,878 0-
AVAILABLE FUNDING
-----------------
Cash 3 Investnents
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-over) I 28-533- --_ 1f,19S I 15,f99-----------
__.--__._--
Interest and Misc. Receipts ` 1,000 2%
______'____ ___________ ___________ I -----------
SUB-TOTAL -__-1,000 0 ___-_ 206 0
__ I ___________ _ __ I ( -----------
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 29,533 14,193 15,705 0
-----------
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/69
1989.90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 07 SOND AND INTEREST - 1962
....................................... •---------- ........... ........... ...........
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90
----_----------_---____________________
BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST
----------------------------
PrincfpeL on Bonds 190,000 200,000 2:0,000 210,000
Interest on Bonds 37,440 30,600 0,600 23,400
TOTAL 227,440 230,600 230,600 I 233,400
.
AUTHOR[ZED GENERAL RESERVE 617,047_ 433,400 I 273,712
___ .-__. ._._-----_-
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 844,487 664,000 507,112
._.
AVAILABLE FUNDING ee®eee .e.e. ..........
Cash & Investments
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-over) 791,487 628,000 627,409 353,000
Transfer from 1970 Bond Fund 137,112 -
Interest 8 Min. Receipts 53000 76=000 17,000
...7.. ------
SUBTOTAL 53,p00 36,000 54,853 154,112
........... ........... ........... -----------
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 844,487 664,000 I 682,262 I 507,112
-----------
Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6/30/89: $650,000
Final Payment Date: May, 1992
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 110.7
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989.90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND B7 BOND AND INTEREST - 1970
--------------------------------------- ----------- -•-------.. ----------- ----------- -----------
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION 011 ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90
----------------------------
----------- -------"-__
BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST
Principal an Bands 300,000 300,000 300,000 I 325,000
Interest on Bonds 51,476 ------ 31,676 10,888
TOTAL ---351,476 331,676 I ---331,676 I I ---335,888
a..00zo=e..
Transfer to 1962 Bond Fund 137,112
AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE 643,862 353,324
---------- ---------- -----------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 99 685,000 473,000
.aeveveesee eee..ee.a..
AVAILABLE FUNDING
Cash 6 Investments
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-over) 941,336 647,000 647,082 452,000
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Interest 8 Misc. Receipts I 54,000 38,000 I 33,035 21,000
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
SUB-TOTAL I ----54,000 I _-- 38,000- I ----33,035- I I ----21,000
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 995,338 685,000 680,117 473,000
_mee.azeeva I vveaeeeae.e I �ese�esa�_ I =eveaa=mee
Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6/30/89: Series "A" $325,000
final Payment Date: Series "A" August, 1989
CDJMTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 6/8/89
SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS
POOJECT TOTAL 19BD-90 1 SPOT-91 19D1-92 1992-93 1993.94 5-lee1 Total 1994-99 10-Year Total
........... ........... ........... -----... ........... ........... ........... ........... .........--- ....... ......__.....
Allocation for Local SeuerS (e) 0,15D,000 150,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,OOD 2,150,000 2,150,000
Orange Park Acres Trunk (3) Cc) IDo,o00 700,000 M,000 000,000
Orange Perk Acres Sauer Imtall. Parch. (a) 123,000 20,060 20,000 20,000 2Q000 20,Oa 100,000 a,= in,=
**Baker-GLsLer Interceptor, 14-1.1A,B (IT (A) 5,320,0DD 120,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 200,000 5,200,000 5,M.CEI0
*Baker-GisLer Farce Mains, 14-1-2 (1) (a) 2,149,000 49,000 50D,OOD 1,500,000 100,000 2,100,000 2,100,000
McGew SIA-[nnk PaaiteL (3) Cc) 400,000 400,000 400,000 40D,000
McCaw Lift Station (3) (c) 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000
PLOP station Modifications, 9-I1 (3) (b) 3,321,000 91,000 1,000,000 1,50D,000 i50,000 3,250,000 3,aO,=
Pap Station Ioproyaants (3) (e) a0,000 100,000 100,000 600,Ooo 100,000 9CD,o00 POU,0a0
Cespus Relief Sub-trunk (3) CC) 550,000 5D,D00 500,000 $50,000 550,000
North Trunk Replacement (3) Cc) 4,900,000 100'"ll 2,400,000 2,500,OOD 2,400,OW 4,90D,00D
Gisler Rea NIL T1.1k (3) (,) M.000 MGM M ODD M.Not
Gisler Red Hill Intercepter (3) (c) 5,000,000 0 5'Cati' 0 5,000,OOD
'Rein Street POry Station (3) (c) 300,000 200,000 200,000 IOD,000 300,OOD
Browning Trunk RePlacesent (3) Cc) 820,000 0 820,000 820,OOD
Red HILL Intercepter Parallel (3) Cc) 1.240,000 0 1,230,Oa 1,240,000
La mn Heights Replacean[ (3) (c) 4,800,000 10D,000 2,400,000 2,300,000 4,800,000 4,000,000
Methole Rehabiliatian (3) lU OOD,ODO 200,000 200,000 40Q000 400,000 000,000
Misc.1t. OL. Projects (a) 1,000,000 IOD,OOD 100,000 100,000 10 .000 COD,= SC I 500,000 1,000,OOD
•.......... .... ...... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
GRAND TOTAL 4 v48,000 v2-4 0,-0-0-04,1lO,OODc Oe3m.00oz 0,510,o00c 4,520,000v S,sm®00 29v260,000 10,483,000 440.243,,D
l ) fully fureed tv Master-plcuma foci Lities Presently Later construction
. v . ......
. .........
a v.v me ... .m. a. m
fb) Part ally Teresa 2. Mpsar-Pamed feci Li Ol Bs pre6atly under dasi Bn
1.) Not Funtlea 3- Mester-plemM feci tutu ea cheaulea for future aeslg-Wcotatructlon
Portion. to as Share,[by IRLD/District No.14
•• Portions to be an me Dy District N0.6 ere TRW/District Mo.14
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 6mf69
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH fLM Page 1
FISCAL YEARS 19u-N THROUGH 1996-99
LINE 1M-90 1990.91 1"1-% 1992-% 19%-% 5•Yor 19as1 19N-N f0-Year fotel LINE
.... ....... ....... ....... ....... silo... ............ ..$16..... ............. ....
OPERATING FUND fiS.N ND.00 f110.0. f1N...
.............. ....... ....... ,197,00 ...........
I Reuryee i Carryover from Lev[ Year ..482,ON 6,2u.... .....!NO ....... . 6,19i,000 ......N0 7,N7,N0 .,.ICON 1
REVENGE
2 There of 1X iex Al lacatien 3,9d0,N0 4,u2,000 4,Su,000 6,939,000 5,319,000 2]rON,NO A,425,N0 56,493,000 2
3 fees: Induvtrlvl West. 30,000 421,000 4".000 557,000 640,000 2,AN,000 4,9N,Ni 7,433,000 3
4 SupplenMn[al User G,259,000 S,iN,000 6,435,000 15,u2,ODD 44,3N,N0 0,249,000 4
5 Interest a Miscellaneous Income 451,000 370,000 313.000 3N,000 499,000 2,016,N0 3,775,000 5,751,ON 5
6 Other A.yM. 0 0 6
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
7 TOTAL REVENUE 4,1n,ON S,OSS,NO 9,644,000 11,067,000 12,NS,NO 43,434.000 86,491,ON 129,%S,ON 7
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
B 70TAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 11,259,000 11,291,N0 13,851,000 15,u1,ON 19,090,000 49,9%,OOD %,355'm 136,407,0N 8
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
EXPENDITURES
9 Thera of Joint Yorks M 6 D I,6N,ON {,1N,000 f,823,000 f,N5,N0 3,751,N0 t7,1%,000 44,73B4ON N,134,ND 9
ID CPllectl on SYYrtem M S 0 end Other Opsr. 1,381,ON 1,445,N0 1,514,N0 1,so m 1.672,No 7,N3,000 9,921,ON 17,524,ON 10
11 Other E.FeeMitura. 1,450,000 2,900,000 2,900,NO S.NO,NO I1,00,000 23,SN,ON 34,SSO,ON 11
12 T07AL EXPENDITURES 3,ut,ON ],Ou,000 9,277,000 9,484,ON 11,223,N0 f2.049,000 78.159.000 120,2u,ON 12
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...... .... ........... ...........
13 A...... B Cerry-Oyer to Meet Year 238,ON 4,207,000 4,614,000 6,197,N0 7,867,000 7,06],000 16,1N,ON 16,199,ON 13
14 Next Year's Dry PerIM fuMinA Reeilrements 2,b,511.000 S,SN,NO 4,619,N0 6•]42,000 5,612,N0 5,612,000 9,tu,NO 9,1u,N0 14
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
15 FUM Bet.. or f0e1Ic1U 3,E7,ON NS,NO fS,N% 1,65,ON 2,255,N0 2,255,NO 7,011,NO 7,011,000 1S
CAPRAI NND(S) .......... ........... .....auv. ......... ..ee...... ..mu... vo.uvu m....oN.
CAPITAL URNS)
16 Reserves S carry-our Free, Last Taxer 21,323,000 11,420,000 21,6%,u0 8,074,Ou 1,117,Ou 21,323,Ou 12,6117,000 21,30,00 16
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ........... ...........
REVENUE
ti C9netructian Great. In GOT 1u,N0 tu,000 17
10 Fas . Cawctich 1,%0,000 Z.033,NO 2,133,000 2,232,000 2,347,000 10,N5,000 13,635,000 2A,320,eu 18
19 IMUvtrl el Waste ISO DO 17S,No 198,N0 228,000 262,000 1,011,000 2,035,000 ON 9
20 Se1e of CaWcity RIRhas 321,ON 29,N0 29,000 u,000 841,000 1,303,000 449,000 ON So
21 In, i MIassllenMous In.. 1,161,ON 1,174,000 1,u5,000 326,000 4N,000 4,205,000 2,555,000 6,7N;000 21
22 Other Inc. 29,000,G00 18,000,000 47,ON,NO 47.ON,ON 22
23 TOTAL REVENUE 1,1N,N0 32,4N,... 3.f15,ON .,069,ON 21,939,000 6f,...!ON .......... N,ON,DN 23
........... ........... ........... 10,943,000 ........... ........... 31.361,00.. ...........
24 IOIAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 25,N3,ON ......,N0 .........0 .......... .........0 ......,ON .......... ........Ou M
FXPEND111MEf
23 There of Jol n[ Walk. Treatment Plant 7,Ou,ODO 9,763,N0 8,52],ON S,lO6,ON 5,779�000 ]4,N1,N0 17,1N,000 51,SOS,000 23
• 26 District CPitutlon S",. 4,771 DO IF )70,No 8,510,OSo 4,520,0N 3,590,000 29,76D,ON t0,4u,000 40,2f3,ON 26
21 Other ExprAltur.s 1,N7,ON 4,000,NO ----.--...- 7,ON,000 8,867,ON - 8:N1.ON 27
26 T07AL EXPEN17UREf 13.663,000 22,133,N0 17,071,ON 9,826,ON 10,3N,N0 ]3,028,ON n,S87,N0 1N,61S,ON 28
. . ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
29 A...I.. S C.rry.xer to Next veer 1.4N.000 21.,6%,000 8,074:0%e a 1e 17e0Na :2 N7,000 12:N7:u0 3:n4,ND s Send ON n
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 6/27/0
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P.R.2
FISCAL YEARS 1980.90 THROUGH 1990-99
Sim DO
LINE 1939-9D IM-91 1991.92 1992-93 INS-94 5-Year TOtel 1994-99 10-Meer TOTAL LINE
.... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ............ ........... ............. ....
am FUN°(6)
30 Ra[erves L Corry-OVer From Last Year 805,000 2i4,000 49,NO 0 0 BDS,NO 0 BOS,ON 30
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... . ........... ...........
REVENUE
31 Tea Leer, 1n,000 1n,Nu In,oN 31
32 Interest 8 Ni...flares. IrcOne 38,N0 11,000 2,000 0 0 SI,ON 0 SI,ON 32
33 Other Ineeme 0 33
3< IaTAL REVENUE IB,NO 11,ON 129,ON 0 0 228,ON ° 228,0N 3♦
........... ........... .........0 .........0 ----....... ..-......0 ...........
35 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUXDIxc Bf3,N0 .85,N0 2QB,ON 0 0 ......ON 0 1,DD,0N 37
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
EXPEN
... ..ITWES
36 Boxes Princl NRl 8 Interest 569,ON 236,000 228,0N 1,m,ON 1,033,000 36
37 Other Espen6ttures 31
N TOTAL FXPExp1TWF5 569,N0 236,N0 228,N0 0 0 1,WS,NO 0 .....:ON ]8
39 Nex 6 Carry-ever ro Next Year 24:000 49,ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
40 Nestt Yea peas Dry Period Funding Rmui raemnu n4ON ,ON G9 0 0 0 0 ° O 40
41 Fw,6 Balance or IDef ic{t) .° .........°. ......... °. .........°. ......... ° .......... e.....vo4. .m... 0 41
SUMMARY (A°luste° for Inter-furs! Transfers) c e ® • •�••
13Re TEENEwar Frm Lest Year ,S0;00 1; 33,00013,a , O, F, . ,O OE,00000 15,0 1 ;21 E3 OAL REVENUE S10 34y 23 N 13,536000 USmW 14, Im. 600 2E9M
44 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 19:6 ,000 55,405,N0 39,190,N0 26,624,000 42,146,000 136,664,0N 125,219,ON 241,11N,000 N
<5 IOIAL EXPENDITURES 19,253,N0 20,453,N0 26,502,000 19,310,000 21,592,ON 1U5 110,ON 105,246,em 221,856,000 45
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
46 Reserm 4 CBrry-Over t9 Neat Year 19,932,ON 15,952,N0 11,BEEF m 7,314,000 20,554,000 W'Su ON 19,9n,0o0 19,92S,o00 46
49 Next Year-. Dry PerioO Fndinp Res iremmis 2,965,NO 3,$91,GO 4,619,No 4,712,000 5,612,000 S,612,DGO 9,188,ON 9,IBB,ON 49
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ...........
48 FUND BALANCE OR (DEFICIT) 15,141,ON 22,361,000 8,069,N0 2,ST1,000 1f,042,ON R,9Q,ON I0,2B6,DN 10,785,0N 48
i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
?l ITATto v
2��19e�i.Volitan p� OAST
SF o 00 �j
U m l�1WW11YI€1 a" N
`Since 4
O9gINGE COVN
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Page 1
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT e11 SUMMARY
---------------------------------- ----------- I ----------- I -----------
I I I I
APPROVED I APPROVED I RECOMMENDED I
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET I BUDGET
1997-88 I 1988-89 I 1989-90
....................................... I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
I I I I
REQUIREMENTS I I I I
------------
I I I I
Operating & Capital Requirements I I I I
------------------------
I I I I
Operatire Fund I 4,682,000 I 6,539,000 I 7,302,000 I
I I I I
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 11,3e2,000 I 8,291,000 I I
I I I
Cepf tat Facilities FUM I 10,652,000
---------- I ---------- +I ----------
SUBTOTAL OPERATING & CAPITAL 31,266,000 124,938,000 117,954,000
----------- I ----------- I -----------
I I I I
Debt Retirement
---------------
I I I I
Bond and Interest Fund - 1951 I 27,753 I 25,000 I 14,000 I
I I I
Bond and Interest Fund - 1958 I 29,000
------ I' ------ ------
SUB-TOTAL RETIREMENT I 115,913 I 92,000 43,000
----------- I ----------- I -----------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 131,381,913 125,030,000 117,997,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS Page 2
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT #11 SUMMARY
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- -----------
I I I
I APPROVED I APPROVED RECOMMENDED I
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDDET I BUDGET I BUDGET
1987.88 I 198E-89 I IM-90
....................................... I ----------- I ----------- I --_-------_ I
I I I I
FUNDING
I I I I
Operative & Capital ----- - I I I I
I I I I
Cash 8 Investments (Appropriated I I I I
Reserves and Carry-Over) 111,773,000 111,198,000 I 7,338,000
I I I I
Other Revenue I 6,078,000 I 3,522,000 'I 8,475,000 I
I I I
Anticipated Tax Allocation
From 1% Levy I 2,025,000 I 1,927,000 I .2,141,000
........... I ------•---• I -•--------. I
SUB-TOTAL OPERATING & CAPITAL 19,884,000 116,647,000 117,954,000
........... I ----------- I ...........
Debt Retirement
--------------- I I I
Cash & Iwestments (Appropriated I I I I
Reserves & Carry-Over) I 56,913 I 45,000 I 16,000
I I I I
Other Revenue I 7,000 I 5,000 I 1,000 I
I I I I
Anmunt Raised W Taxes for I I I I
Debt Obligation I 52,000 I 42,000 I 26,000 I
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------_ I
SUBTOTAL DEBT RETIREMENT I 115,913 I 92,000 I 43,000
I ----------- ----------- I ..--------- I
TOTAL FUNDING 119,999,913 116,739,000 117,997,000
'Adjusted for Inter-Fund Transfers
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No.11 papa 1
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/W/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND R11 OPERATING
....................................... .......... ........... ........... ........... ...........
ESTIMATED
APPIRAM APPROVED ACIWLL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET EXPENDITURE WOGET
90
1------987-M 198E 89__- .----1986 -- -------
OPERATING
Directors Fees 7,000 7,000 5,500 I 7,000
Sery
ces
C Snaaretof Joi tlOperatiN 2,491,000 3,239,000 2,380,000 3,175,000
Trunk Maintenance 141,000 130,000 14,800 124,000
MaMole and Lim Reps Ire I 15,000 15,000 15,000
Pump Station totem
128,000 130,000 I 84,ion I I 125,000
Remit and Intl. Wit. Adein. 70,000 70,000 52,000 70,000'
Connection Fee Acknin. 30,000 36,000 48,900 39,200
I" Collection Expense 5,300 8,300 9,300 9,900
Treasurer-s Imestrent Ado.
8 Banking Fees - 8,000 10,OOD 6,600 5,500
Utiliti ea 80,000 85,000 74,WD I 85,000
Profesaioml Services I 5,000 5.000 I 4,900 I 7,NO.
User Fee Expense I 15,000 I 14,100 I I 72,000
printing Ard
icatim
50
400 Soo
.100
Travel 8 Meeting O 1,ng - Directors I no 300 ' Mo I I 1 sm
Wcollectible Accamts ---__1_0� 1��_ I i I _____1_
TOTAL OPERATING 2,982,000 3,753,000 2,695'800 3,738,000
NON-OPERATING
-------------
Interest 9,000 33,000
ExF,anaea A licable to Prior Years ---- 3�000 --_- 3-000 1 ---- 1-500- I ---- 3,OW
TOTAL NON-OPERATING --__1?_GRIND
_ 36'000_ I "----i.�_ I -'- 3.000-
...
TOTAL OPERATING 8 NON-OPERATING 2,994,000 3,799_000 2,697.300 I I{I 3,741,000
___________ ____" _____ I
___________
RESERVES
Appropriation for Contingencies I 191,000 I 855,000 1,690,000
Authorized General Reserve I 1.497.000 I 1,895100a 0 I I 1,871,000
TOTAL RESERVES I 1,688,000 I 2,750,000 I 0 3,561,000
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 4,682,000 6,539,000 I 2,697,300 � I 7,302,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 Page 2
BUDGET REC6MNENDATIONS 6/20/89
1959-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND #11 OPERATING
ESTII TED
APPROVED -------- ACTUAL REBUDGENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET E%PACTUALRE BUDGET
1987-W 1988.89 1988-89 1989-90
AVAILABLE FUNDING
-----------------
Cash 8 Invests is
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-Over) 2,348,000 2,791_D00 I 2.352.300 I 2,856_D00
Fees 100,000 274,DDO 205,600 227,000
Supplemental User Fees 1,281,000 1,315,800 1,851,000
Interest end Met. Receipts 143,000 196 250,300 227,000
Detingaent Texas --- 63_000_ __--70,000 86,400 107,000
---------- I -----------
SUB-TOTAL 3D6,000 1.821.000 I 1,858,100- I 2_412_000
Tax Allocation I 1,976,000 1,877,DDO 1,848,900 I 1,991,000
Subvention 52,000 50,000 47,800 I 43,ODO
SUBTOTAL 2,028,000 I 1,927,000 1,8%,700 I 2,034,0D0-
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 4,682,000 6,539,000 6,107,100 7,302,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 Page 1
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND Oil CAPITAL FACILITIES
--------------------------------------- ........... ........... - ----_------ --•--------
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DEBCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE SUDOET
1987.88 IM-89 ITT...
... 1988.89
...
....................................... ........... ........... ..... ........... ........
PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES
Treatment Plant Expansion 4,071,000 6,791,000 4,242,000 I 7,098,000
Appropriation for Master-Pta med
Treatment Plant Facilities 6,430,000
Master PIan/EIR Update 40,000 40,000
Radio Linked Telemetry System 15,000 15,000
Slater Ava. P.S. Replacement, 11•tOR•3 25,000 I 1,800,000 93,000 I 3,133,000
Ocean Avenue Trunk Rehab., 11-16 300,000 650,000 802,000
Edwards Trunk 2,770,000 I 26,000
Projects Funded by Developers:
Coast Trunk Sewer 500,000
Slater Relief Line 100,000 I '
Coact Punp StatloNForce Mein 100,000
Joint Works Equity Purchase 114,000 425,000 127,000
Earthquake/Flood Damage Reserve 212,000 286,000 I - I 346,000
Appropriation for District
Facilities Improvements and
Expansion 525,000 i 75,000 94,000 i ..........
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 15,202,000 10,108,000 5,358,00010,652,000
see........ ........... ........... .........vv
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.11 Page 2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND N11 CAPITAL FACILITIES ,
--------------------------------------- i -----------
i .......--.. ESTIMATED ---------- -----------
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET E%PENDITURE BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 I 1988-89 I 1988-89
----------------- --- ---------- ----- ---------- ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
AVAILABLE FUNDING I
----------------- I I
tacit s investments I I
(Appropriated Reserves and I I
Carry-over) 9,430,000 8,407,000 8,331,800 4,482,000
---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Construction Grants 517,000 196,000 4,800 190,000
Connection Fees j 600,000 j 720,000 j 97 ,000 j j 783,000
IltlYstrist Waste Fees j 30,000 82,000 j 61,000 67,000
Sate of Capacity Rights 306,000 I 331,000 2,400 I 324,000
Sale of Capacity to District 3 I I I I 1,500,000
Joint Works Equity Sale I I I 306,000
Bolm'Chice Annexation Fee I 2,926,000 I I 2,75C,000
Advance in Aid of Construction 700,000
I ntermt and Mite. Reeeipn 695,000 372,000 I 543,000 I I 250,000
R-TOTAL 5,772,DING 1,701,OD0 88 I 1,5 ,200 I 6,170,000
SU
...
-...
•---
I ----------- I ( -----------
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 15,202,000 110,108,000 I 9,920,000 110,652,000
CaNTr SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
I= N11 BOND AND INTEREST - 1951
....................................... I ----------- I ----------- _ I -----------•ESTIMATED I I -----------
APPROVED APPROVED I ACTUAL I I RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCWMT TI7LE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
•---•----- 1987-88 1988-0 I IM-89 I I I989-90
800 RETIREMENT AND INTEREST
__________________________
Principe( on Bcnft 13.DOo I 13,000 13,000 I I 13,000
I I
Interest an Binds 813 488 I --- I I 163
TOTAL 13.813 13.688 I __--13,488 I 13,163
AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE - 13,940 I 11,512 I 837 _
__________ I I -----------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 27,753 I 25,000 I I I 14,000
AVAILABLE FUNDING I
--Cash A InVestnents
(Appropriated Reserves and i
Carry-over) I 15, 53 I 13,000 I 14,514 I 7,000
_ I -----------
Ceti ncFawvt Taxes I 1,000 I 1.000 I 900 I I 1,000
Interest S Misc. Receipts I 1,DDO I 1,000 I 513 I I
___________ I ----------- I I --____--___
SUB-TOTAL 2,000 I 2,000 I 1,413 I 1.DDU
---------
-- I ----------- I __________. I ________-__
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES ------ I ------ I ----- I 6,000
TOTAL AVAILABLE FINDING - I 27,753 I 25,DDo I 25,6@ I I 14,000
OUtstandin8 G.O. Be:Ls 8 6/30/89: $13,000
Fi net Paltent Date: August, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
+ FUND N11 BOND AND INTEREST - 1958
....................................... ........... ........... . ......... ........... ...........
ES711WTFN
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL Rl001D19MDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET EXPENDITURE BIDET
1987-a8 1988-89 1988-89 1989.90
--------------------- -- ---------- ----------- I ........... i ........... ---"-""----
BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST
----•-----------------------
Principal an Bonds 50,000 50,000 I 50,000 I 15,OW
Interest on Bonds 5,500 3,500 3,500 1,500
TOTAL 55,500 93,500 53,500 I 16,500
AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE I - .32,660 13,500 i I 12,$W
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS ( `®vvva8,v� vvv6ev000 ' II vv.29,0W
AVAILABLE FUNNING
Cash b IrneatoNnts
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carryover) 81,160 ..32.000. I ...36,263 ,000
. i ._..9 .
Delinquent Taxes ! "•---2,000 2,000 3,156 ! 1,000
Interest b Misc. Receipts I ..... 1000 I --• ----- I I "".......-
SUB-TOTAL -•-•5,000 -"__•3,000 I 5,569• I 2,000
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 42,000 ! 32,000 29,659 18,000
� "
----------- I -----------
TOTAL AVAILABLE LANDING 88,160 67,000 I •71,491- I --""29,000
.eev—vvare .vxv___— I —x.vavv_v I I ..........
Outstanding G.O. Bonds 0 6/30/89: $150,000
Final Payment Date: January, 1999
"a"Y W17ATIN DISTRICT 0.11 6/W/W
SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS
PROJECT TOTAL C.I.P. 1909-W I M-91 IWI-92 1992-93 1993.94 5-Tear Total 1994.99 5-Year Total
-
-.-------- ----- -'.. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ........... ............
Slater-Sprirglele Marlette Rehab. CC) 300,000 _ MD,OW 300,OW 300,00D
McHIeM-Delaaere geMOle Re11W. Et) 3W,OW 300,000 300,CDO 3ul'amo
Slater Ave. Fury Station (b) 3,493,000 0,000 sami 1,sW,OW 1,000,W0 3,WO,WO 3,AW,OW
Slater Ave. Farce Main CC) aac'm 1CO,W0 MO,OW W0,000 Wo,OW
Slater Ave. Relief (a) I'Mo,= 2011 1,WO,OW W0,000 I,TOO,OW 1,7W,OW
Wicewest Reptaceart CC) 3,7W,OW 2W,OW 3,500,000 3,750,000 3,xO,OW
Heil Interceptor (CD 500,0110 SW,pW SW,WO SW,OW
Slater/Springdale Reptecerent CC) 7W,OW 0 750,WD x0,e0
HarMr Relief (c) I,SW,WO 0 1,5oo'm I'M,=
Edinger PraD Station Ieprcv ras Cc) no'm 0 x0,000 xO,OW
Misettemcua Projects (1) xD,OW 75,W0 Ys'm 75,000 YS,000 7s,OW 375,000 375,COD OSD,=
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ..........
GRAND TOTAL 14,093,W0 %,OW 9x,0W 1,sx,OW 1,Sx,OW 2,3x,000 4,Bx,OW 11,125,00 2,0x,W0 14,OW,OW
(a) Fully Fnmded 1- Master-pl¢me6 facilities presently under
Ib) Partially FurHRd 2. Master-ptemed facilities presently under deign
fU poI graded 3. Master-ptarred facilities scheduled far future declONcoastruction
CRRTI SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 U2210
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH TIM FARE 1
FISCAL VMS 1989.90 INDI NA 1998.99
LINE 190.E 199E-91 1991-92 1992.93 1993.94 5-Yrsf IKeI 1994T 10•Trsr Intel LI0
OPERATING -RR 340.E 375.E t110.OD f1f0.E f10.00 3210.0E
...-----------
An,Ve ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ...........
1 Rrserves b Carry-Owr frnn Left Year 2,06,..E ......E0 4,193,..E ......E0 6,90,0.E 2,656,..E 8,60,0E 2,.36,0E 1
REVENUE
t Seen of tY pX AIIKKian t,f41,E0 2,312,..E 2,491,000 2,6%,00 2,911,OOD 12,557,0E 18,444,00E 11,OD1,0E 2
1 Fors: Indairl el Neste R81,ED 261,E0 no,ON us ON 397,OCD 1,530,DDo 3,on 00 4,6E,OE 3
4 S,pplenntel User 1,651,00E 3,498,E0 5,10,000 6,626,0E 7,09,000 i4,]]2,OE f6,322,000 T1,M DO 4
5 Intern NI...I .: re I.. Y21,E0 2]S,EO 316,000' 412,EO 552,00D I,TBi,D00 3,190,00E 4,972 000 5
6 Other Reverue 0 0 6
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
] TOTAL REVE BOB 4,N6,E0 6,346,000 8,281,0E 10,079,..E 11,s0,0o0 A0,6U,OE 71,05,E0 111,06,00D ]
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
B TOTAL AVAILABLE FEDIMG 1,02,..E 9,Er,E0 12,474,0E 14,11130,000 18,393,000 43,07,E0 79,01,E0 114,532,000 IT........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
EXPENDITURES
0 Seere of Joint Works N b 0 3,nsp0 3,626,000 4,141,00E 4,255,of 4,01,00E 20,058,000 36,916,E0 56,%G,000 9
10 Col lactinn 5Yt[em N b 0 eM Other OPer. 566,0E 58B4OR 612,00E 639,0E 668,00E 3,0]S,EO 3,390,E0 6,963,00E 10
11 Other EApntlitures 1,SOO,EO 3,E0,000 S,OOD,000 4,2..,00E 11,7..,0E 2],000,000 0,700,000 11
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
12 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,141,0E 5,114,E0 ],15],000 7,994,..E 9,729,000 3A,01,OE 67,806,000 10t,07,000 12
.]...y...E..p.. ....��...�.... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
13 Rrserm b Carry-Over to Neit Yeer 1�6]0�000 S�Ni,OWE 3 8n;000 3;0G61,000 <;3�;000 6;333:0m 11'8e70,m 1�r810;OW 06 if NRAt Yrsr•t Or, Perfect iuMtnp R¢Oulrmmts
..:........ ..:...:.... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
15 TINTS BeIOKe K (Deficit) 1,690,0E 1,336,0E 04,00E 2,959,EO 1,01,0E 3,01,0E 4,0215,000 4,025,00E 15
CAPITAL FLATS) ersrsoeo• •ee.mm .m..m.. ........... ......... .a®s..®.
16 Rrslfvrs t Grry-over Fr.R Lest Year 4,402,0E 2,579,0E 18,444,000 10,460,900 5,467,000 4,18t,0E 19,024,0E A,AB2,E0 16
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........I... ........... ...........
REVENUE
17 i;;;; NCtinn Grants 19o,ODD 190,00D 19QOE 17
IB Fen: connection 181,0E 821,00E
2 VIplenMnnl User 862,OE P03,OE 949,..E 4,318,000 5,508,000 9,826,DDo 13
19 In6mtrlel Waste61,5E 17,00E OE,O Ice,OE 11],EO 453,000 9E,OE 1,161,0E 19
0 S 0 0 E
21 Sole of Capacity 41,ha 32<,OE 159,000 29pE 1,123,0E 315,0E 1,950,00E 371,00E 2,321,000 21
2S IOmeeer1. scel lernous Ircana 4,Sm'000 30,000;000 1,025,00E 50,0E 24 SEES ON
$8,556,000 1,535,0E 56�556:� a
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
24 TOTAL REVENUE 6,11,00E 31,02,000 2,0..,0E 2,693,0E 26,249,0E 0,919,0E 11,323,000 0,242,000 24
----------- ------"___ ._.__..__.. _....-..... .........-- ........... ........... ...........
25 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 10,652,000 34,331,000 20,449,000 13,153,0E 11,]16,EO 75,4..,00E 10,167,0E 8f,R4,EO 25
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
EXPE017MES ))2�ry9 26 - District Joint NOrke Treatment Plant ],09B,E0 i91's62,OE 8,611,00E 2�330�OGD 6'BRs0GD 34,120�000 12r8]5;000 52 of m 26 27 Db[nc[ COIIKtIOn Syeten 975,..E ir57]55.000 1. ]S.EO r27
28 Rein4Yreenent ABr.%. 0 0 28
n Other EeyeMitures 4,50,0E _ _ 4,00,0E 8,500,000 3,50,0E 29
. . . . . . . . . . ........... ........... ...........
30 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,011,00E 15,937,0E 9,989rE0 7,686,0E 12,692,0E 54,3n,000 E0,154,OE 14,531,0E 30
........... .......... ... .. .... .. . . . . ....
31 Reeervee b Cerry-over to Beef I., 2,519,0E IB,444,OE 10,4E,E0 5,467,0E 19,024,0E 19,024,001) 10,193,0E 10,193,0E 31
CXXMTY ERMITATICM DISTRICT 0. 11 6Y22YM
FIfGLETEEALSDIM-90CIXp0uN 1i9DB 99 Paper 2
LIME 19M-90 IM-91 IM-92 IM-93 I993-9< 5-Yen TOOL 1996-99 10-Tor TOTAL LIME
.... ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ............ ......I.... ............. ....
ROMD 14" 1
32 RnA,YAA 8 Cerr,-Orn From Lot Yor 16,Ow 13,M0 %,MO IA.= 14,UDO 16,Bw 14,Ow 16,Ow 32
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
REVENUE
33 Tu Leevvyy 26,OM 16,M0 13,M0 13,000 15,000 M,BM 61,OOD 1<8,000 33
3< Mtereet B Niuel LeeouL 1. I,OM 1,Ow 1,M0 1,OM 1,000 $,MD {,wD 9,w0 34
35 Other 1.. 0 35
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
36 TOTAL REVEMUR ... I),OOD. ....li m 16 OM - 16:0w -.. MIND ...Q'm 65 000 1T7.OM 36
37 TOTAL AVAILABLE FLOODING <],w M,OM 30,M0 30,OM 30,M0 1M,w0 79,MD 173,000 37
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
EPEOI1 s
39 Other Primippi LuA Interest 30,OM 16,w 16,OM 16,w0 16,OM D{,0w 77,w0 171,M0 36
Experd ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
40 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ID,Ow 16,6M 16,0M 16,M0 16,w8 9{,w0 T,Ow 171,w0 0
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
41 RoerYN L CerrY-Mr to Nut Tor 13,Ow t<,w U,MO M,w0 1{,0w 1{,Bw 2,Ow 3,Ow 41
42 Meat Teerh DrY hrfa6 iuroir0 ReOulremnb 13,Ow 1{,OM 1{,MO 1{,MO 1<,Ow 14 DO 2,Ow 2,ODO 12
43 Fvq Retwe Or (Deficit) o D D .e. .. .ee0 ....® e@c o D o 13
31NONRY (AOIutM /n Intn-Faro Trwhn) ....e...... ...e........ .......e.e.. .... ...... .em..... �c•}}�55<•<•pp••Mpp•
U ReeerYM 8 Cer,-OYO, Free Licit Trr 7 3MO M 6,153,8w 22,651,0w I5,195,0� 31,7m5{�ow IOV,6BSi.oN 27'm ON) 192;075 OM {S 45 TOTAL REVENUE 10.6{3,M0 M.165,w0 10,SM,wO 12,188,
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
46 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUMIM 17,o7,UM U,S18,w0 n.M,OM 27,983,w 50,1<1,w0 117,OM,0w 110,127,w0 199,{22qq M f6
47 TOTAL EXPENITURES 11:0U,Ow 21,667,0D 17,i58,w0 15,5i6,Ow U'07,w0 M,302,w0 M,037,Ow IT7,339-0M 47
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .......i...
16 Reorvn L Ca,"-Mr t9 WANT Tor 6,153,Ow 22,6q.M0 15,19S,Ow 12,M7,00 27,70{,Uw 27,M,MD 22,M0,Ow 22,00 OM 0
49 Meat Year'. DIY Pertro FWi, R qulrwnte 1,M{,OM 2,8 ,Ow 3,M1,w0 3,461,w0 {,879,0w 4,879,MD T,an,wD 7,8 ,OM o
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
5D FIND BALANCE M (DEFICIT) {,2M,M0 19,iB0,OM 11,SBA,MO B,126,Ow 22,025,OM 12,RS,Ow 1{,219,OM 14,218,M0 50
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
NNITATION
A 5e io4clitan 0Po �V,
� Po �j
0
U o e N
nce i9sk
09gNGE COX)
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 6/22/89
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT $13 KISMET
....................................... I ----------- ----------- I -----------
I I I
I APPROVED I APPROVED I RECOMMENDED I
DISCRIPTION OR ACCOURT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET I BUDGET
19B7-88 I 1988-89 I 1989-90
....................................... I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
I I I I
REDUIREMENTS I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
Operating 8 Capital Require..... I I I I
I I I I
Operating Fund I 216,000 I 313,000 I 743,000. I
I I I I
Capital 'Facilities FmW I 9,947,000
-.------- I -.------0 I ---------
SUBTOTAL OPERATING & CAPITAL I 7,143,000 I 7,574,000 110,690,000 I
----------- I ----------- I ----------.
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS I 7,143,000 I 7,574,000 110,690,000
I I I I
FUNDING I I I
I I I I
Operating & Capital Funding
--------------------------- I I I
I I I
CesA & Inves tnMnts.(Appropri e[e6 I I I I
Reserves end Carry-Over) I 6,070,000 I 6,587,000 I 7,484,000
I I I
Other Revenue I 3,206,000
------OBU •I ------- --------- I
SUBTOTAL OPERATING & CAPITAL I 7,143,000 I 7,574,000 110,690,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I
TOTAL FUNDING I 7,143,000 I 7,574,000 110,690,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.13 Page 1
BUDGET RECOMMENDATICNS 6/20/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND #13 OPERATING
....................................... ........... ........... . ......... ...........
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET .- 8 9 0
--------------------------------------- ---- -- ---- ------ ........... I ......
OPERATING
Directors' Fees 6,000 8,000 8,600 10,000
Contractual Services
Share of Joint Operating 34,000 58,000 62,000 134,000
Trunk Maintenance 20,000 5,000 200 5,000
Manhole Line and Met Welt Repairs 15,ODO
Pup Station Maintenance 10,000 3,000 3,000
Permit and Intl. Waste Admin. 1,000 1,000 1,000
Connection Fee Admin. 26,000 19,000 7,600 I 113,700
User Fee Collection Expense 800 800
Treasurer's Investment Admin and
& Banking Fees 4,000 4,000 5,100 4,500
utilities 2,000 1,000 I 1,000
User Fee Expense 3,200 3,000 3,200 8,000
Professional Services 1,000 1,000 1,000
Printing And Publication 1,800 1,000 400 I 1,000
Travel & Meeting . Directors 1,000 1,000 500 I 1,000
Uncollectible Accounts 1,000 1,000 1,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
TOTAL OPERATING 126,000 106,000 88,400 285,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ...........
NON-OPERATING
Interest 10,000 10,200 10,000
Expenses Applicable to Prior Years 3,000 1,000 1,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
TOTAL NON-OPERATING 3,ODD 11,000 10,200 11,000
TOTAL OPERATING & RON-OPERATING 129,000 117. ... ---000 98600 I 296.000
-- .. -
RESERVES
Appropriation for Contingent lea 22,000 137,OD0 299,000
Authorized General Reserve 65,000 59,01DO 148,000
.
TOTAL RESERVES 87,000 196,000 0 447,000
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 216,000 313,000 98,600 743,000
COUNTY AINITATIOU DISTRICT NO.13 Page 2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/20/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 013 OPERATING
....................................... ........... ........... . ......... ...........
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90
....................................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
AVAILABLE FUNDING
.................
Cash 8 Investments
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-Over) 149,000 165,000 155,600 398,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
User Fees 59,000 135,000 314,BD0 315,000
Interest 8 Misc. Receipts 8,0o0 13,000 17,400 30,000
........... ........... ........... ...........
SUB-TOTAL 67,000 148,DOD 332,200 345,000
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING _216_000- _ -313_000 v487,800 ee743,DDee
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.13
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/27/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 013 CAPITAL FACILITIES
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BWORRY BUDGET EXPENDITURE BUDGET
1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90
--------_---___________________________
PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES
_________________________
Treatment Plant Expansion I 23,000 95,000 I. 259,000 I 134,000
Appropriation for Master-Planned
Treatm0nt Plant Facilities 575,000 3,OB4,000 4,778,000
Capacity Right Purchase fray
District 2 I 192,000 261,00: 61,700 413,000
Appropriation for Future Coll action
System Capacity Rights Purchases I 6,136,000 3,435,000 4,498,000
Joint Works Equity Purchase 392,000 131,000 117,000
Earthquake/Flood Damage Reserve 1,000 4,000 7,000
___________ ___________ ___________ I ...........
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 6,927,000 7,261,000 451,700 9,947,000
.........a I .._........ ........
AVAILABLE FUNDING
Cash G Investments
(Appropriated Reserves and
Carry-over) 5,921,000 6,422,000 6,392,200 7,086,000
___ _ _ ____ ________ ---___-----
Federal and State Grants 3,000 3,000 10 3,000
connection Fees 525,000 I 374,000 I 153,00: 2,27S,000
Sale of Capacity Rights 2,000 3,000 300 3,000
Joint Works Equity Sale 28,000
Interest and Misc. Income 448,000 459,000 565,000 580,000
___________ ___-------_ ...........
SUB-TOTAL 1,006,000 839,000 718,400 2,861,000
___________ ___________ I ---__-----_ _-__---___-
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 6,927,000 7,261,000 7,110,600, 9,947,000
....®.... ....n..z:ss ....�. ...........
C.NIT S.RIT.1IOY DISIRIO NO. 13 6112/1"
SCHEDULE Or CTFRCIII "CHASES IN CISTRICIS' MLEC71M RIVERS
Prior Years
PrNlect(Oniryf Diatricn(q) 7OGL Purcchhased 19100-90 IM-91 1991-92 1992.93 1993-94 5-Year total 1994-99 10-Tear total
........................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ........... .............
Santa A. Riwr Interceptor (2) 3,431,000 5"'wo 413,000 333,000 346,000 3S9,000 371,000 1,022,000 1,019,OOD 2,041,000
Swe6 Sent.Raw Rival Intercepter (2) M'CONY 82,000 %'m 136,000 135,000 491,000 ?31,000 T22,000
Richfield SWtrm6 (2) 16,000 2,0D0 2,o00 4,000 4,000 12,o00 4,e00 16'Not
Ratle00 Sp ik (2) S07,e00 I'm I'M 3,000 2,000 T'wo 500,0a0 507,Doo
East Richfield Interceptor (2) 24,000 4,am 4,000 4,000 4,001) 16,em 0,000 24,000
left Interceptor (2) 29T,o00 33,000 34,000 35,000 37,000 139,000 ISO,= 29T,000
CartN Certain Interceptor (2) 2,20,000 64,000 110,0D0 lull 0 10i'low SN,000 1,06,000 2,220,000
EDttid Interceptor 62D,000 144,000 149,000 293,000 327,000 620,000
Mange Perk born Sensors (1,7) 2,610,000 3M,D00 391,Oo0 403,e00 1,I74,000 1,436,e" 2,610,000
-----•
EIM'e Tom ..... ........ . ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ....%,OOp....... ........... ............
10,44i,000 ...as.... 41a.- SI9,OW 9TS,000 .....as. 1,333,000 4,4 5,359,000 9,6T,000
D
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 0. 13 6/20/89,
FISCAL YEAH 1989�-90CTRR0 OXNIP�99 Page 1
LINE 19B9-9D 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 19%•W !•yar letel 1996-99 10 yNr }Orel LINE
.... ....... ......o .07.0 $10.0 ....... ............ ............ ..........--- ....
OPERATING FUND f76... ...... ...... ....... ti22.0 t215.0
.............. ....... ....... .3N,N ....... .(65,00 ...clog.....
1 RnarwS i Cerrv•OVM Pram Lnt YaN ....... .f7,00 330,00 ...... (W,00) 398,00 (2N..0) 398,00 1
REVENUE yy
0 R:O. wpI�ntil IUs., y�gDpp 35p 00 137,1pp01 111 0 0 I,014,00 3,014,00ion 0 11,05,000 14,6�,00
5 Oetl gteV Xirnll anaoN IneaN y0;000 00;00 16,000 2;000 0 FBI 1S,= i1 000�00 5
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ...........
6 TOTAL REVENUE yL3,000 378,00 553,00 70.00 1,044,000 3,00,000 11,6n,on 14,70,00 6
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
7 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 76y,00 825,000 881,00 90,00 999,00 3,40,00 11.421,00 1l,W6,00 7
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
EMPFND I TUNE
yB Share Of Joint e WAS N t 0 13f,00D 2W,D00 4n,00 SW,Oo N3,00 2,10,D00 9,4W,00 1 y� e
0 Cot tOtheect iich OrurnN 4 0 aaR other Opor. W,000 20,000 324,0D 3N60 435,00 549,000 SN,060 21,1W. R
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
11 TOGL EXPENDITURES 296,000 495,000 752,000 966,000 - 1,7M.000 3,737,000 11,065,000 14,B02,000 11
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
13 Neat Year.Or,PeerintltivWlryYRnulremantr 148,000 NFL,= 3f6,00 00;NG (614,000 614,0005 1 614,OW 1 614,= 13
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
14 Fuci Sol.. or (Oaneit) 099,ooD t2,ago (26,ON) (SAB600 (RW,DOO) (6N,006) (},256,o00) 0.258,M) 14
"PIT" FLEXIBLE) .......a... ........... ......... ...es..as .......... .......... . .........®_ ........__®
........FLEX....
15 Reiroom t Carry-me Free Last Ynr 7,OB6,DOD 9,20,000 12,012,000 15,45760 19,576,00 7,086,OD0 0,976,000 7,M,N0 15
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............ ............
REVENUE
16 CoOatruatien Great. 3,000 3,Oo0 I'm 16
17 Pant Connection 2,275,000 3,S39,00 5,312,000 6L.M.00 7,307,OW 25,115,00 22,4n,ODD 47,587;00 17
19 OSAuOposent.L User 0 yy 00Sp 21y08
10 leeeraet EWR14ra119Maea incaN SB0:0000 737;0000 974;000 1,2682;000 t,Sif 000 5,095;000 9,7055;000 14,0111: 21
22 ",:, at AN 0 0 E2
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
23 TOTAL REVENUE 2,01,00 i,29S,00 6,287,000 7,9]2.000 0,02,00 30,227,00 32,10,00 62,40960 23
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
24 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING p,D47,00 11,578,000 18,299,00 23,309,000 28,328,00 37,313,00 S6,158,00 69.49S,00 24
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
EXPENDITURES �� pp ppp 25 Shore of Joint Wks TreataNnl Plant IN Sao IN,= M,S00 050;000 1, n,ow 4 49R;Oao 5 33509;000 9,057:00 2256
Ei OMer lFRperlit.rsen syatN 117;000 58161000 1,]07;000 2;W4,00 3,045,00 8;1G,DDD 11,904,00 2D,11ii'm 2'7
........... . . . ........... -------1... ............ ............
28 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 664,00 1,566,00 2,842,00 3,813,00 4,452,00 13,3P,0oo 17,615,00 30,955,000 28
29 Reserver S Corry-over to Meat Year ......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 0........ .......... ....... 29
0
COJNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 6/20,89
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Valle 2
FISCAL YEARS 1989-90 THROUGH 1990-99
1215.G0
L INF 1989 90 1990.91 1991.9E 199E•9! 1991-w 5.1aer Total 1994-99 10 Year Total LIU
..-. ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ............ ............ ............. ---
READ FM(S)
30 iNurV a 6 cnry-Cv.r 11m Last Year 0 0 0 0 30
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
REVENUE31 y
m In mast 6 Nie n callnoue latme 0 0 0 0 0 0 32
33 Other INARm .. . 33
34 TOTAL REVENUE ........�. ........�. ........�. .....-..�. .....-..�. ........�. -........�. ............ 3
35 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUMINGO O O 0 O O D 335
EXPENDITURES
36 BOrA Prirciml A Interest 0 36
37 Other ExpeMitures -.•._._. .. 39
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............
38 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 30
39 Reserve R Carry-over to Nut year 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ]9
40 Most Year'v Dry Period! iuMinp Rpui rsmnn 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
41 fu,d wlence or (Def ltiq a--- 0 .m.ea.e. .o.a..eev. ..a...o..:. ..a...e..0 u®e 0 .e.®wv LI _
6UIOMRY (Aal3ute0 for Inter-futl Twofers) aaaaa
<6 ReT07AL REYEXUEY Ovar irm Last Year 3;22w,m 4,630;OE6 16;M6;000 1S:m:ow 10;SB%;G� 36;4561000000 61;B67;OW 77 i 0;00m0 42
........... ........... ........... ........... 2.q ........ ........... ............ ..µ..6...I....
45 TOIALAEXPEN011WE6FLOIDINO 10,mim I21:%I;m 13:5VA,c" E1;�,ODD 5;6606;0000 li;UA,mO 20',607;0w 43;1SY,10 {5
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
46 Raurwe R hrrv-Guar m wu Year 9,930,000 12,1Q,000 15,30a,000 19,311WO 000 M,M,000 ES,921,000 096,0N0 ]0,Egq66,000 46
<9 xaxt Year's Dry Marital FvglM Requiremats I" No 240,000 ]y6,000 00 614,OW 61{,000 ;614,000 1,E14,am 47
........... . . . . ........... ........... ........... ........... . . ............
48 FUND BALANCE OR (DEFICIT) ve:�:�. 1 'm. IS'o:.eeOUeve :.::.�..'OUOa ?]�11�,0� E]�11®.000e i�,Em02v.�0:. ao,—Y2,m {B
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
PNjTATlON
2�d 6e coP°litan o 40Z&
� o
0
U m V b N
N
Since 1954
��gNGE Co�N
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 6/22189
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
DISTRICT #14 SIRpARY
APPROVED APPROVED RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
1987.88 1988.89 1989.90
....................................... ........... ........... -----------
REQUIREMENTS
Operating B Capital Requireamants
--------------------------------
Operating Fund 14,000,000 1,136,000 847,000
Capital Feci li ti es Fund 12,963,000
--------- --------- ----------
SUB-TOTAL OPERATING 8 CAPITAL 118,598,000 8,495,000 13,810,000
----------- ----------- I -----------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 18,598,000 8,495,000 13,810,000
evvvvvvmvv vmvvvcvvvv I evvavvvv '
FUNDING
Operet- 8 Capital Fwd1nB
--
Cash 8 Investments (Appraprlated
Reserves and Carry-Over) 13,078,000 777,000 1,925,000
11,885,000
Other Revenue --------- --------- ----------
SUB-TOTAL OPERATING 8 CAPITAL 18,598,000 8,495,000 13,810,000
----------- I ----------- I -----------
TOTAL FUNDING 18,598,000 8,495,00D 13,810,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.14 Page 1
BUDGET REDUOIENDATIONS 6/26/89
1989.90 FISCAL YEAR
fUNO #14 OPERATING
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
ESTIMATED I I
APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL I I RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET ENPENDITURE I I BUDGET
1987-M I 1988-89 I IM-89 I I 1989-90
_______________________________________ ___________ I ___________ i ----------- ----------- i ___________
OPERATING I I I I I
----"-----
I I I I
Directors' Fees 6,500 I 6,500 I 6,100 I I 6,500
Contractual Services I I I I I
Share of Joint Operating I 619,000 I 731,000 I 712,000 I I 490,000
Trunk Maintenance I 100,000 I 50,000 I 5,800 I I 50,000
Pump Station Maintenance I 86,000 I 50,000 I 31,500 I I 50,000
Inter-district Service Charge I I 52,000 I 75,100 I I 52,000
Permit A Ind. Waste Main. I 2,000 I 3,500 I 8,900 I I 10,000
Treasurer's imestment Ada. I I I I I
8 Banking Fees I 85,000 I 25,000 I 3,700 I I 2,5N
utilities I 20,000 j 20,000 j 34.100 j j 40,000
Professional Services i 10,000 5,000 "a 2,000
Printing 8 PUDtication I 1,500 j 1,000 I I I 1,000
Travel 8 Meeting - Directors 1,000 1,000 200 1,000
I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ( -----------
TOTAL OPERATING I 931,000 I 945,000 I 878,000 I I 705,000
I ----------- I ----------- ----------- I I ___________
NON-OPERATING I I I I I
------------- I I I I I
Expenses applicable to Prior Years t,000 I 1,000 j 1,300 I'm
I .....----- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
TOTAL NON-OPERATING I 1,000 I 1,000 1,30D I 1,000
--- --- --- ---TOTAL OPERATING 8 NON-OPERATING I 932,ODO 946,000 879,300 706,000
I ----------- I ----------- ----------- I -----------
RESERVES I I I I
Appropriation for Contingencies I 186,000 190,000 I I I 141,000
I I I I
1 RL0 Investment Deposit and I I I I
Interest Earnings 112,882,000 I 0 1 I
___________ ___________ I ----------- I I --------___
TOTAL RESERVES 113,0 US,ON I 190,000 I 0 141,000
----------- I ___________ I ----------- _____------
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 114,ON,000 I 1,136,000 I 879,300 847,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.14 Pape 2
BUDGET RECOMMENDATICNS 6/26/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND #14 OPERATING
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- ----------- I ----------- I -----------
ESTIMATED
APPROVED APP0.0VED I ACTUAL I RECOMMENDED
DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE I BUDGET I BUDGET I EXPENDITURE I I BUDGET
1987-88 I 1988-89 I 1988-89 I I 19B9-90
--------------------------------------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------- I -----------
AVAILABLE FUNDING
Cash 6 Investments
(Appropriated Reserves and I I I I I
Carry-Over) 112,729,000 537,000 I 471,600 I I 405,000
I ----------- I ----------- I I -----------
0 8 M Assessment (TRW) I 357,000 I 521,000 I 450,900 I I 423,000
Interest 8 Misc. Receipts 914,000 I 28,000 I 86,300 I I 19,000
----------- I ----------- I ----------- I ----------.
SUBTOTAL 1,271,WO I 549,000 I 537,200 I 442,000
........... I ---------- I ........... I I ..........
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 14,000,000 I 1,136,000 I 1,008,800 I I 847,000
=__________
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.14
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6127/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
FUND 014 CAPITAL FACILITIES
....................................... ........... I ----------- ____ ----------- .._...-_..-
EST IINTEO
APPICAMER, I I I I RECOMMENDEDBUDGET
DDfET IEIDEID TIDES DESCRIPTION OR ACOOIINT TITLE BUDGET
_..__.... 19w_w87--SS... 1908-8D 1988-� 1988-89
PROJECTS AND EXPENDITURES
_________________________
Treatment Plant Expansion - 3,"11,000 5,537,O110 3.931,000 I 5.845,000
Main Street P,np Station 30,000
I
I
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, 14-1-1A,B 757,000 1,340,000 30,700 I 4,403,000
Baker-Gisler Force Mai re, 14-1-2 i 84,000 I 149,000 I 43,300 i I 2,100,000
Earthquake/Flood Damage Reserve I 179,000 I 233,O110 II I I 285,000
Appropriation for District Facilities I I I I I
Iaprovesants and! Extensions i 100.000 I 100,000 I I i 250,000
___________ I ___________ I I __---_-...-
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS I 4,598,000 I 7,359,000 3,964,000 I I 12.963,000
AVAILABLE FUNDING I I I I
_________________ I I I I
Cash 4 1.vaents 349,000 112,190,ODO 112,448,800 I I 1,520,000
Less: IBM Itrvastment Deposit j j 12,000,000 j 12,000,000 I
----------- I ----------- i ----------- -----------
(Appropriated Reserves and
Cerny-over) I 349,000 I 190,000 I 448,800 I I 1,520,000
___________ ___________ i ----------- .-______--- -
Capital Facilities Assessment (IRW01 3,251,000 I 6.194,000 I 4,459,200 I I 10,344,000
Construction Grants 438,000 160,000 j 41000 I j 156,000
Joint Works Equity Sale 256,000 I 475,000 I 546,000 I 530,000
Sale of Capacity Rights j 259,000 j 281,000 j 2,500 j j 267,OOD
Interest and Misc. Receipts I 45,000 I 591
000 I 351,000 I I 146,000
----------- I ........... I -__-_______ I I ______-----
SUB-TOTAL I 4,249,000 I 7,169,000 I 5,363,000 I I 11,443,000
----------- I ........... I ----------- I I ______-----
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 4,598,000 I 7,359,000 I 5,811,800 I I 12,963,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.14 6/14/89
SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS
TOTAL C. A. 1989.90 IM-91 1991-92 199I-W 1993.94 s-Year Tote( 1994.99 10-Year TRIAL
----------- -------•--- ••---••---- .-...-..-.- ..--....--- -..-.-..--- -----•--.-. .-..-.-..... .-.-...-•-- --•-----•...
Baker-Older Intercepter, 14.1.1A,S (D)v 16,450,000 4,000,:. 6,ODD,000 1,OOO,aD0 5,000,000 450,000 16,450.000 16,450,000
eater-Oleler Porce Mains, 14.1.2 (Uv 2,100.000 500,000 1,500,a00 100,000 2,IOO,OW 2,100,000
Mein Street Pwp Station (c) 1,50a,000 I,000,000 1,000,000 50,000 1,500,00
Miscellaneous Projects (a) 250,000 n,000 25,aw 25,000 25,00D n,000 In,O00 In,00o no,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------'- --'----'--- -.---...---
cRAND TOTAL ACO ...D... ......v .. 4s 2s.... v....0.. ...........12 .O25Y00 .....000 ........ . .u6e....0.. e 0]OO,W0
fe) fully fussed 1v Mest.,,iiatnel sec l l l ties We..,ly uale. ..tructiw . vs. vu vu u . ... .0 ...........
• .. w. .ve
(b) Yeh[1..hie [herM py 3. Neater plam eE feclllilec sccheetlduules far FAYY...BnMslONcantrwtlm
District No. 6 area District No. 9
0
COUNTY S017ATIN DISTRLLT NO. 14 6/20/89
STATEMENT 01 PROJECTED MIT FLL11 Par 1
FISCAL YEARS 19M-90 TNROIGN 1998-99
LINE 19M-w IM-91 1991-w 199E-9J 1993-9f 5-Ypr Tetel 1904-W 10 Yeer Taal IINE
-... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....-....... ............ ............. ....
OPERATING FUND
1 Reserves a Carry-Over free Lest Yeer GOS,OoO 1{1,OW 193,000 256,GOD... ....... ....... ..M.w..... -4Z.00------ 1
REVENUE
2 She re of 1%The ALtocetion 2
3 feea flRw) _ An 001 1,005 1 1,3M 08N 1,556,000 2,0§Z,mpoo 6,325,000 21,099,0w 27,424,000 33
L Intere t E xe¢cell eneous Irc� 19;000 12;000 16;OOD 20,000 2f,000 92,0w 265,000 157,000 l
5 Other R<vmue 0 0 3
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
6 TOTAL REVENUE 442,000 Ir01]_r000 1,345 r000 I,ST6,000 2.03f,000 6,4T],000 21,364,000 2TrT61r000 6
. . .. . . ..... .. _
T TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 80,000 1,158,000 1,538,000 1,832,000 2,342,000 6,822,000 21,754,000 28,1N6,OM /
........... ........... ........... .........- ........... ........... ............ ............
EXPENDITURES
a Share of Joint Works X e 0 490,000 TJT,OoO 1,042,000 1,2T3:00,0 /,682,000 5,224,000 18,M2,000 23,466,000 8
9 [oitection Slat am x B 0 AM Other Game. 216,000 228,000 210,00o 25G,0p0 2T0,000 1,208,000 2,1N2,000 3,390,000 9
10 Other fxpeMures 0 0 10
11 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 9116,p00 965,000 1,262,000 I,S2T,0p0 1,952,000 6,432,000 Mp24,000 26,856,000 11
4 Reserves and Carry-ever to Xext Year 141,000 193,000 256,000 305,000 390,000 3Po,000 i,P0,000 1,S30,W0 12
CAPITAL FUNDIS)
......., -.-
13 ReservAA tt &6 Carry-over Trani Lea[ Fear ... D,000..... ......... ......W0 ........ ......... ......... ............0 1,SM,o.. 13
REVENUE
14 Canatruction Gnnts 156,000 156,000 156,000 1{
15 feet: I0.w 10,3G4,000 16,i06,000 T,312,000 8,518,000 1.703.000 {4,501,000 14,2M,C00 58,BOS,poO 15
16 Other 0 p 16
i] Sale of Capacity Rights 26),000 28,000 80,000 811,000 34G,000 1'"0.000 w,ow 1,6M,000 17
18 IntOreat 8 Nbcellmeas I,com 146,000 231,000 220,00D 165,000 116,000 8]8,p00 235,OOD 1,113,p00 18
19 Other Ixame 530,W0 530,000 S3D,000 19
........... .......5,000.... ........... .......0.... ........... ........... ............ ............
20 TOTAL REVENUE 11,W,W0 16,96 T,612,W0 9,l94, 00 2,163,000 4T,6T2,OW 14,5lS,OOD 62,t22,000 M
21 TOTAL AVAILABLE ElRmlxG 12,961,000 19,558,000 11,52l,000 11,M9,000 l,S23,OOD W,19T,p00 15,45g000 W,Ti2,000 21
........... ... ........ ........... ........... ........._.
EXPENDITURES ------------ ---- - -----
22 She of Joint Works Tree[men[ Pont 3,045,000 8,121,000 T,09l,000 4,G14,000 3,143,000 28,61T,000 14,2M,000 42,846,000 22
23 District Collation System l,325,000 T,sn'Do0 2,125,000 S,OG5,0o0 4T5,000 19,6D6,p00 6M,000 20,300,000 23
24 Other ExpeMi[ures 0 0 2{
5 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,3TII,Ow 15,6{b,000 9,219,--- ........ 3,......0 4N,M..... 1l,....... 63,....... M
26 Reserves 8 Carry-over to Meet Year 912,0011 2,3..... ..se..... 905,000 905,000 5%,000 596,000 26
D
CONEY UN17ATION DISTRICT NO. 14 6/20/69
STATEMENT Of PROJECTED CASH iLO Rage 2
q SCAL YEARS 1988-09 THROWN 1997-96
LINE 1989.90 1990-91 1991-98 1902'93 1993-94 5-Year Toasl 1994.990 10 Year Total LINE
.... .... .. ....... ....... ....... ....... .-.......... ...-.-...... ............. ----
BOND FM(S)
23 Roervas i GrrY'Mr free Last Year _ _ 29
28 "AM wwyy
29 Interest i Mi Nel lemala Ine0me 2299
30 Other I.. 30
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
31 TOM NAM 31
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
R TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING R
ENPEYDITURf0
33 ;n Principe\ i Interest I5
u Other EayeMltene ..........^ 34
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............
35 EOTAL EXPENDITURES 35
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
36 RaasrYas d Grry-Owr to Mast Yeer u
3l Neat Year•e Dry Parled fuldiM RA9,OirennOte 39
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
38 Few Sol.. er (Deficit) 18
SIMNARY (AOPated far Inter-field Transfer.) eeemem u}}m.v...e .®......... ............ ..se....... ......em me®m. ............
40 Re TOTAL REVENUerm S E-aar free Last Yasr 11,OOS,OON 11,9BI,0D0__ &,*cm 11,0901,000 4,20,000 54;094,000 35,909,a00 "'Lari,000 0
........... ......... .. ........... ...... ..
41 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 13,810,000 20,916,000 13,062,000 13,631,ON0 6 865,000 56 019,000 N,204,000 91 920,ON0 41
42 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 11,096,0D0 16,611,000 10,501,000 10,966,OOU 5;MITI[) 54;224,000 35,275,000 9d002,ON0 42
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
44 Aeser9as d Cerrv'DNar to Beat Year 2,234,000 4,105,000 2,561,000 2,665,000 1,295,0m 1,293,000 1,926,ON0 1,926,ON0
45 Neat Year-.Ury Parise! Pullin,Re9ulreante 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
46 FOND BALANCE ON (DEFICIT) 2,1S4,OOD {,103.000 2,561,p00 2,665,000 1,295,0O 1,295,O0 1,926,00 1,926,000 46
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
JOINT WORKS
OPERATING BUDGETS
5PNiTATlo v
�� 0 oP°litan 0 �IS,�
t
J a o n
� Since 195A .�
gq�'GE COUNT
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
ADOPTED JUNE 14 , 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
d ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
May 24, 1989
1p EWE AVENUE
vo EOx E127
FWNTNN VALLEY.MIFOPNIA 9272MI27
914)EE23411
MEMORANDUM
TO: Boards of Directors
FROM: Executive Committee
SUBJECT: Summary Report and Recommendations re 1989-90 Joint Works Budgets
(Personnel , Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund)
Recommendation
The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee recommendation
to adopt the enclosed 1989-90 Joint Works Personnel , Operating and Construction
Budgets.
Summary Report
The accompanying budget documents provide detailed information concerning the
proposed Joint Works budgets. The following discussion highlights and
summarizes the recommendations for the three elements of the Joint Works budgets.
Personnel (See Blue Report)
New Positions -
Summary: Staff has previously advised the Directors that major treatment
plant expansion underway and new program implementation to comply with
changing regulatory requirements would require significant staffing
Increases to operate and maintain the new facilities and to support
related activities and other required programs.
Over these past few years we have completed and placed into service
$43.5 million of new plant facilities and equipment. We currently have
$105 million in new treatment plant facilities under construction that
will be placed into service during the 1989-90 budget year; and $31
million in individual District facilities under construction. An
additional $195 million in treatment facilities and $55 million in
collection facilities are under design and will be constructed and placed
Into service over the next few years. The 30-year Master Plan now being
considered by the Boards recommends additional major facilities.
This year our various departments requested 70 new positions. The General
Manager has reviewed these requests with the Department Heads and is
recommending that the Directors authorize 41 new positions in 1989-90.
Many of these positions will not be filled until later in the year, and
some may not be filled at all if completion of construction projects is
delayed. Four of the 41 positions are part-time. The recommended
positions are in support of a variety of programs as summarized in the
following table:
Memo to Boards of Directors
Page Two
May 24, 1989
Summary of Additional Staffing Requests
Program/System Positions
Finance and Management
Support Services (Accounting, Purchasing, 6
Warehousing, MIS/EDP)
Risk Management/Safety Engineering 1
Operations and Maintenance
Odor Control and Air Scrubbing Systems 2
Sewage Collection Systems 2
General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 4
Technical Services
Regulatory Compliance 4
Source Control Program 5
Process Monitoring & Laboratory 2
Engineering ,
Facilities Planning & Design 5
Construction Management 10
Total 41
The recommended new positions would raise the authorized staffing level from 497
to 538, an increase of approximately 8%.
Annual Cost
Based on the anticipated need to fill the new positions over the course of the
next year, the recommendations would add $1,191,689, approximately 6.5%, to the
Fiscal Year 1989-90 salary budget. The maximum future annual salary cost
assuming all positions are filled at the top step is $1,489,260. An additional
27% would be added to the total to reflect the costs of employee benefits.paid
by the Districts, including retirement, health, life and disability insurance,
workers compensation, unemployment insurance and uniforms.
Pending Classification/Organizational Studies
The three-year memoranda of understanding (MOUs) which were approved by the
Boards for the period from November 1987 through November 1990 contained
provisions for certain classification studies. These studies are now underway
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989
Page Three
by two outside consulting firms and are expected to be completed by early
1989-90. It is anticipated that modifications will be recommended to some
existing classifications and salary ranges. The classifications being studied
are:
Unit Classifications
Administration 8 Clerical All except Warehouse classes
Operations 8 Maintenance Plant Maintenance Division
Four Specialized Sr. Plant Operators
Control Center Clerks
Technical Services Laboratory Division
Compliance Division
Lead Industrial Waste Inspectors
Engineering None
The Districts have several projects under various stages of development or
construction to improve security at the plants. Many of these projects will be
completed during the next year. As part of this effort we are evaluating the
need for security personnel , primarily to monitor and to control access at the
entry gates. Upon completion of the study next fiscal year, a recommendation
will be submitted to the Boards on the staffing requirements for this needed
function.
We are also proposing an organizational study over the next year to determine
the need and place in the organization for a customer service type of division.
Soon all Districts (but No. 14) will have implemented supplemental user fee
programs and it is expected that this division would be responsible for
administering the user fee program (now in six Districts) , and the large
industrial /commercial user fee program in all Districts.
Staff will return to the Boards with a specific recommendations as the studies
are completed. There is no appropriation in the 19B9-90 budget for any changes
that might be forthcoming from the recommendations. However, any budgetary
increases could be funded from payroll savings or reserves.
The following summarizes the personnel /staffing recommendations:
Management Department
- Personnel Office: A Risk and Safety Manager position is recommended to
administer all risk management activities including group medical plan
coordination, workers compensation, liability and property insurance and
to expand the existing safety program.
Finance Department
- Accounting: An additional Accounting Technician position is recommended
to assist with accounts receivable and accounts and contracts payable and
to provide needed back-up and relief in other accounting areas.
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989
Page Four
- Warehousing: A Senior Storeskeeper position is recommended to assume
leadman duties as the Plant No. 2 warehouse expands and completes the
transition from a satellite facility.
- Information Services: This Division was formed last year and minor
reorganization and expansion is now recommended. The existing
Programmer/Analyst is recommended for an upgrade to Information Services
Specialist and the existing position is recommended to be down-rated to
better reflect responsibilities. One additional Programmer and two
additional Information Services Technician II positions are recommended to
provide repair, maintenance and support services required by our expanding
use of computers.
Operations and Maintenance Department
- Plant Maintenance: This Division is requesting a new Foreman position to
be responsible for groundskeeping and landscaping crews and for outside
contractors. Three additional Helper positions are recommended to provide
painting, groundskeeping, digester and general maintenance and janitorial
services throughout the plants.
- Collection Facilities: One Collection Facilities Worker II and one
Collection Facilities Worker I positions are recommended to supplement
existing crews as several new interceptor sewers are nearing completion
and will be placed into service soon.
- Mechanical Maintenance: One Lead Mechanic position is recommended to
upgrade the off hours, weekend or swing shift, preventive maintenance
program and an additional Mechanic is recommended primarily for the new
odor control facilities that will be operational next year at both plants.
Technical Services Department
- Compliance: A new classification of Compliance Supervisor is recommended
to reflect a reorganization of this Division and to provide supervision
for the quality assurance/quality control section and for the marine
monitoring/marine science section, allowing the deletion of two Principal
Environmental Specialist positions. The air quality section is proposed
to be supervised by a new Engineer position which will allow the deletion
of an Associate Engineer position. One additional Environmental
Specialist III and three additional Environmental Specialist II positions
are requested to support the ongoing quality assurance/quality control
work, the marine studies program, the air quality program and to improve
District-wide sampling, analysis and evaluation.
- Laboratory: A salary range increase is recommended for three vacant
Laboratory Supervisor positions to more adequately reflect supervisory
responsibilities in the three Laboratory sections. An additional
Principal Lab Analyst is recommended for mid-year to operate a new
$300,000 gas chromatograph/mass spectrophotometer. The transfer of
some quality assurance/quality control work to the Compliance Division
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989
Page Five
will allow deletion of. two Senior Lab Analyst positions. One entry level
Lab Analyst I position and two additional Part-time Assistant positions
are also recommended.
- Source Control : A new Engineer position is recommended to assume
supervisory responsibility in the enforcement section, to develop overall
enforcement strategies and procedures and to provide technical supervision.
Two Assistant Engineer positions are recommended to work in the
enforcement and pretreatment sections. Expansion of the monitoring and
enforcement programs will require three additional Industrial Waste
Inspector positions.
Engineering Department
- Director of Engineering: All of the clerical staff for the Engineering
Department is budgeted in this office and an additional Senior Steno Clerk
position is recommended for the increasing work load.
- Planning and Design: The 30-year Master Plan being considered by the
Directors points out the need for many new facilities in the future.
Accordingly five new positions are recommended for this Division to
provide project leadership and to allow development of the professional
staff. These positions are an Engineer, an Associate Engineer, an
Assistant Engineer, an Engineering Aide II and a Part-time Assistant.
- Construction Management: Project management and construction inspection
needs are also projected to increase in the future. An Engineer, a
Principal Construction Inspector, a Senior Construction Inspector and
four Construction Inspector positions are recomnended to accommodate this
workload and to decrease our dependence on outside consultants. An
Engineering Aide III and a Part-time Assistant are also recommended to
provide needed support to the engineering and inspection staff.
Projected Payroll Cost
- The full employment payroll estimate is $26.6 million, but we expect to
realize a payroll savings of approximately 10% due to personnel turnover,
delays in filling new positions, tight control over hiring activities,
temporary adjustments in plant operation schedules and procedures to
minimize staffing, and delays in major construction schedules. Our total
payroll cost is therefore targeted at $23.7 million.
- Net payroll and benefits, after chargeouts to CORF and the Districts,
account for approximately 40% of the total budgeted Joint Operating Costs.
- The actual payroll savings may be affected by pending classification and
organizational studies previously discussed as there are no provisions in
the budget for any changes that might be forthcoming from those studies.
Any proposed changes will be considered by the full Board prior to
implementation.
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989
Page Six
JOINT OPERATING BUDGET - JO (Green Report)
- The $44.53 million Joint Operating budget finances the operating and
maintenance costs of the joint treatment works and the joint
administrative activities.
- The major factors that are causing increases in our Joint Works operating
and maintenance costs include:
- Regulatory Requirements: more stringent air pollution control
requirements mandated by the South coast Air Quality Management
District (AQMD) for control and reduction of hydrogen sulfide (112S) ,
oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and oxides of sulfur (SOx) emissions,
resulting in significantly higher chemical costs to remove pollutants
from the digester gas produced in our treatment plants and control
emissions from our digester gas-fired engines.
- increased costs for engineering, monitoring, enforcement, outside and
in-house laboratory services and special project activities carried out
by the Compliance, Laboratory and Source Control staffs to comply with
the ocean monitoring and pretreatment program provisions of our NPDES
permit as well as our AQMD permit requirements
- increased costs for use of higher volumes of chemicals such as ferric
chloride and anionic polymer used in our physical /chemical treatment
systems to improve solids removal efficiencies as required to maintain
compliance with the discharge limits set forth in our NPDES permit
- Sludge Disposal : a proposed 50% increase in tipping fees effective
July 1, 1989 at the Coyote Canyon landfill , as well as increased costs
for hauling and disposal in a private landfill of waste-activated
sludge and grit and screenings which the Regional Water Quality Control
Board has determined cannot be disposed of at the Coyote Canyon landfill ;
and higher costs for private reuse alternatives to landfill disposal
- Odor Control : increased chemical usage for expanded odor control
program including 20 new foul air scrubbers as well as increases in
the unit cost of caustic soda
- Repairs and Maintenance: increased maintenance and repair activities
throughout the Districts' expanded and upgraded treatment facilities
- Comparison with 1988-89 Budget: The accompanying excerpt from Schedule A
of the Joint Operating Budget (Green Report) highlights the comparisons
between the proposed 1989-90 budget and last year's budget and also
summarizes the reasons for the increases (and decreases) by major budget
category.
- Increase Over 1988-89 Budget: The $5.6 million increase is 14.5% over the
1988-89 budget. Of this, 8.8% (or more than 60% of the increase) is
directly attributable to regulatory mandates such as improved wastewater
treatment and AQMD regulations requiring significant improvements in
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989
Page Seven
r
control of air emissions, and increased costs for chemicals, as well as
the ocean monitoring, pretreatment and toxics control requirements set
forth in our NPDES permit. The remaining portion of the increase, or
about 5.7% (40% of the increase) is due to inflation-related increases in
the costs of operating and maintaining expanded facilities and to
accommodate additional flows into our treatment facilities.
Self-Funded Insurance Plans
The Districts have been self-insured for several types of coverage for the last
eleven years as a result of Fiscal Policy Committee recommendations that were
implemented by the Joint Boards of Directors.
Workers' Compensation and Public Liability
- The Workers' Compensation and Public Liability plans have been in
existence since 1979.
- The savings realized through these self-insured plans plus in-lieu
premiums deposited and interest earnings on the reserves in these funds
have resulted in a current reserve level of $2.3 million, compared to the
original $500,000 reserve level set by the Boards when the plans were
established. The Committee recommends that the reserve level proposed for
1989-90 for the Workers' Compensation fund be maintained and the reserve
level in the fully self-insured Public Liability Fund be increased to
$1.7 million.
- An appropriation of $155,000 for in-lieu premium contributions by the
Districts is recommended in the Workers' Compensation Fund to maintain the
existing reserve level at $699,000.
- A $265,000 appropriation has been included in the Public Liability Fund
for excess loss insurance in the event the current study and the
potential availability of this coverage is deemed desirable by the
Directors.
- The Fiscal Policy Committee is again recommending that the Boards of the
individual Districts continue the practice of setting aside reserve funds
to partially cover deductible levels for the Districts' all-risk property
insurance coverage. The reserves are recommended to increase an additional
$1 million to the $5 million level for 1989-90.
Health Plan (Schedule VII , Goldenrod)
- The Self-funded Employee Health Plan has been in existence for the past ten
years. Our claims experience in 1988-89 appears to indicate that the cost
containment provisions enacted in 1984, which include both increased
deductible requirements and co-payment levels, have been somewhat effective
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989
Page Eight
In helping to stabilize our claims levels on a per-employee basis. Although
total costs have increased in response to continuing increases in the total
numbers of active employees, their dependents, and retired employees
participating in the plan, the cost per employee covered has decreased.
- These increased total medical care costs required transfers into this fund
during the past year over and above the anticipated premiums. However, we
have partially recovered some of these expenditures from increased premiums
paid by employees for family coverage. Staff expects that the increased
Districts' and employees contribution level authorized by the Boards during
approval of the salary and benefits agreements negotiated with the employee
groups in 1987-88 will also reduce any required transfers in 1989-90. We
expect these changes, and new cost containment provisions that are also
included, will enable this fund to be self-supporting by the end of the
three-year MOU period. Budgeted District premiums are equal to premiums
approved for the HMO plans.
- Disability payments for short and long-term disability were unusually high in
1988-89. There is a two-year limit for long-term disability payments and
this expense is expected to decrease over the next two years.
CORF BUDGET (Yellow Report)
- Summary: The $102.7 million Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) Budget
finances the construction of the Joint Treatment Works Facilities. It
includes major and minor projects which have generally been previously
presented to the Boards for review as part of the Master Plan and/or
agenda process. Any project under $15,000 requires informal bidding.
Projects over $15,000 require formal bidding, and any projects over
$25,000 require Board approval in accordance with District procurement
regulations. The budget is prepared under Scenario 2 assumptions included
in the 30-year Master Plan now under consideration by the Directors.
- Source of Funds: The budget will be financed from existing capital funds
accumulated in the individual Districts' Capital Facilities Funds,
proceeds from the 1986 sale of Certificates of Participation, new
connection fees and from limited Federal and State grant funds.
- Master-Planned Projects: The 1989-90 CORF requirements total
$102,725,000, an increase of $7,745,000 over 1988-89. The budget
includes funds for several major master-planned projects, including
completing the construction of the new headworks at Plant 1, the new
outfall booster station at Plant 2. Also included are the central power
generation facilities at both plants, and additional primary treatment
and sludge handling facilities at Plant 1, completion of a new plant
entrance, interior circulation roads, expansion of the administration
building and the construction of a new central laboratory.
- Project Categorization: Schedule B-2 entitled Classification of Budgeted
Projects by Revenue Program Categories classifies all the proposed
1989-90 capital outlay projects into three categories to assist the
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989
Page Nine
Directors in evaluating the need for the proposed levels of expenditures.
These categories are: -
- Replacement/Reconstruction Protects - These projects are required to
replace or rehabilitate aging or deteriorated equipment or structures.
- Improvement/Upgrade Projects - These projects are mandated by various
regulatory agencies, including the EPA, State-Regional Water Quality
Control Boards, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and other
local agencies.
- Additional Capacity/Increased Hydraulic Requirements Projects - These
projects are required to accommodate increase hydraulic requirements
(additional flows) that the Joint Works facilities must process and
dispose of over the next five to ten years, as identified in the latest
Joint Works Master Plan.
The $102,725,000 in proposed CORF projects is allocated to these three
categories as follows:
Project Category 1989-90 Budget Allocation
Replacement/Reconstruction $ 37,658,000
Improvement/Upgrade 6,415,000
Increased Hydraulic Requirements 58,652,000
Total 1989-90 CORF Budget Request $102,725,000
The staff is available to answer any questions from the Directors. If you desire
additional information before the meeting, please contact Wayne Sylvester or
Gary Streed at (714) 962-2411.
ItlP-d Jom mWnr 31.1D SIOtEI IMW!3
s/u/m
a1tPp1 N Inunm/wlnlm n.wxisrm eio¢r SE(U1v11dR nr. sY/re
(3) (I) ICI (b IFI
Inc'...
Wfo< IMQ., a.ra EKIYN WP toYl
U'AAI 1 ., Pup.v brMlm/ n vplmn vI.... w.r vNa'au ry v0tlq
Gtpry wm•L v[m.Jaaum AAA m A . J2py_ IrcryaY/IOJmm1 ,
I. M slJln.qu 3 IIs.a3.gV IIY.M.tl4 3 M. fl.ml.m a.M.ae NIMIn Iml m m tl3N MYIry Suay1PM
.1Y palti.:Y tlHtlwl mIltl..Ill b plAN In.tm SW
MYnI)Y vNNt I--'All"A n mpllw atlntlY.YIMIN
rplr[atll ImYllm nr aN rIm WY1ry Smilbrlry.kl�st W
wN Wl ..I.pyaY 1m1uMry ai p.NorY. m mVo1
W.11 ...Mtlm[mJa[[3.
-IP6m ylgrn Iml v311PmINYry af.
-IiY-tl Mlr�t amN3 Nls WSN{pnY[IIY.�uu M 3 mb
nY MrctIW M fPl
I.w
E. Ob1.n l3Urld1 A.... S.aI.OT IE1.. In.= ttl.Yq �Iul JpWVsnl NM1.N/PNw mr rcryu/(b[w<[I
a m1IM
alum ktd.OT) .,A ppNW 3l bma fm I mi4ol.
u13 mlm Wt.
lYL ImrW
m m bn nllmdr[bMm mvlrmtln.
auatl[ab JES.py 1.dp In¢latlq M.11-1
(Smlu Npmfb) fml Slr uJ4v3. ft, Pg b
tll b 4m't Ilm Am.1 Ipbryn
d1I16"Al."ql Yn b IwYnR W..
IlySgn lNYlY .31.tlp3 bpi ClrM{INLL
I[nd3 alnrlb a3,WI Im1mb dIrIM In GIPnV M(IAO
IVY P31.11•
FM,.. . YE,ro] I.aNlml/UNIYI YNYnt mr
.rdoa onpn aminm IJrery....
.1n nw rm dmr wwl.
NI]Nn )__1�` uap Imrw n nn 1mrw.
Em W
1. vmrnneW Sbmm� s,lss.nA 1.nfO.mE Im,[m Em.YO NE.tlC -p wont{rrc mM Ednn olM.
s.mol
I. X1ba Pmul 3 olpul I...LN s.39o.oW Sd,Pm em.W] I.WAN -1..I.IWIII NpIry ro.
-InlNa.In Mpul maY for V".roWpYnul Wtlml Y 3 nalt
eI lrtadatl naY1mIW It apY YqT W Y[.
A. [ml3vnv tNrAV Im.tlY W.IM Io.W so.® -ImvN m m m bIn plmnt.
0. v In/WInWrtJ 1.163.WJ l.)6s.<d ISO.W p..Wl tmr® -Pnnb lm mylp rlordeW ry11n 1e O.1.11 tN igrvb
smlw/Splln fac"Itlu utl p mX m4n1 [plpnt.
). Pnnrt.3lWlbnm I.M.M1O E.nA.tlA YA.GUI Ila..[Ol -0gNNpb\rwlmmr.pp10111t1n fp<vanmlllbrlp
0MM b Llal[IM' 1Y1L.[odlM Jfwt<nll IrtryN.
B. MV., 3.0%,Ptl ).EM.m) XO.[W W.Pa I.M.. -Ircryan1am MIYr.brlp I.w—mm INPIA W1mW
[bltlml W1tpr1..NYn[r[<111t1u.
P. OWr WYrinla, 1.11.a E01 ,0.y E.fYE.OA I... All M.. -I. .b v{ymt PYnn.aY/I W ylmnl adlliw.
l.. mYl min W..n11p 1N.ml,000 fI3,a1,® a.3N,mo u.va.00e tl.Iw.®
FpY.a
11. vn.uY W MrNY E 0.m m. NS tl0 rM m
v. 4t lulm Wnnum M.Al W.M. a.n... Il.sm.® /S.MI.WI
wrc..a
SCHEDULE I
JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW 8 SUMMARY 5/11/89
COMPARISON OF BUDGETED 8 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 8 ESTIMATED CARRY-OVER
FISCAL YEAR 1989-90
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)
Budget Recommended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est'd Carry-Over
1988-89 Budget or 1987-88 Expenditures or to Fiscal
1989-90 Decrease 1988-89 Decrease Year 1989-90
1. Net Salaries, Wages 8
Benefits $15,685,000 $17,687,000 $2,002,000 $12,829,800 $13,694,000 $ 864,200 $1,991,000
2. Odor Control 8 Chemical
Coagulants 5,189,000 5,687,000 498,000 4,243,100 5,006,000 762,900 183,000
3. Professional 8 Contract
Services 5,551,000 7,350,000 1,799,000 3,638,900 5,369,000 1,730,100 182,000
4. Equipment Charges 190,000 200,000 10,000 169,500 193,000 23,500 <3,000>
5. Repair 8 Maintenance
Materials 8 Services 3,165,000 3,765,000 600,000 2,879,000 3,215,000 336,000 <50,000>
6. Research 8 Monitoring 2,202,000 2,070,000 <132,000 1,943,900 2,188,000 244,100 14,000
7. Utilities 6,056,000 7,220,000 1,164,000 4,421,800 4,825,000 403,200 1,231,000
8. Other Materials, Supplies
8 Outside Services 2,049 000 2,602,000 553,000 2,218,600 2,135,000 <83 600> <86 000>
9. Total Joint Operating
Expenses $40,087,000 $46,581,000 $6,494,000 $32,344,600 $36,625,000 $4,280,400 $3,462,000
10. Revenue and Offsets 1,200,000 2,050,000 850,000 1 771 600 2,091,000 319,400 <891 000>
11. Net Joint Operating $38,887,000 $44 531 000 $5 644,000 $30,573 000 $34,534 000 $3,961 000 $4 353 000
Schedule II
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 5/24/89
JOINT OPERATING FUND
Fiscal Year 1989-90
ALLOCATION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES
A B C D E F G H I J
GALLONAGE FLOwS 1989-90 FUNDING ISON 1988-69 COMPAR
1988-89 Estimated Estimated
District Flows Estimated 1989-90 Percent District Estimated Required District Required
No. Past Year Increase Flows of Total Contribution Carryover Funding Contribution Funding
1 9,083.33 MG 116.67 9,200,00 MG 9.19% $4,092,000 $ 400,000 $ 3,692,000 $ 4,223,000 $ 3,846,000
2 30,570.76 1,431.52 32,002.28 31.96 14,232,000 1,391,000 12,841,000 11,468,000 10,445,000
3 31,189.25 642.40 31,831.65 31.79 14,157,000 1,384,000 12,773,000 12,265,000 11,170,000
5 4,509.53 50.11 4,559.64 4.55 2,026,000 198,000 1,828,000 2,104,000 1,916,000
6 5,390.66 430.43 5,821.09 5.81 2,587,000 253,000 2,334,000 2,050,000 1,867,000
7 7,498.25 687.21 8,185.46 8.17 3,638,000 356,000 3,282,000 2,749,000 2,504,000
11 6,676.47 458.80 7.135.27 7.13 3,175,000 310,000 2,865,000 3,239,000 2,950,000
13 171.55 131.40 302.95 0.30 134,000 13,000 121,000 58,000 53,000
14 2,003.85 <903.85) 1,100.00 1.10 490,000 48,000 442,000 731,000 666,000
TOTALS 1 97,093.65 MG 3,044.69 MG 100,138.34 M 100.00% $44 531 000 $4 353,000 $40,178 000 $38 887.000 $35 417 000
. JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUIX17 SCHEDULE III
JOINT OPERATING 8 WORKING CAPITAL FM 5/17/89
1989-% FISCAL YEAR
1986-87 1987-U 1988-89 1988-89 1989-E
ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BURET RECOMMEND
1. SALARIES 6 WAGS 11,191,376 13,149,700 14,739,000 16,258,000 18,530,000 la)
2. RETIREMENT 1,888,014 2,191,366 1,983,000 2,938,000 3.384,000 lal
3. WORKERS COMP 120,000 186,000 134,000 1341000. 155,000 (a)
4. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 19,237 15,855 5.000 25,000 25,000 (a)
S. GROUP INSURANCE B99,901 1,Z76,752 1,198,000 1,353,0130 1,509,000 (a)
6. UNIFORM RENAL 47,267 51,497 73,000 57,000 84,000 (a)
7. TOTAL BENEFITS 2,974,419 3,721,470 3,393,000 4,507,000 5,157,000 (al
8. SALARIES, WAGES, 8 BENEFITS 14,165,795 16,871,170 18,132,000 20,765,000 23,687,000
9. DIRECT CHARGES-CORF/01ST (1,828,505) (2,249,960) (2.578,000) 12,850.000) (3,500,000)
10. COST ALLOC-CORF/DIST (1,329,824) (1,791,523) (1,860,000) (2,230,000) (2,500,000)
11. W.O. SALARIES 6 BENEFITS (3,158,329) (4,041,482) (4,436,000) (5,080,000) (6,000,000) (6)
12, NET J.O. PAYROLL 11,007,466 12,829,687 13.694,000 15,685,000 17,687,000 (c)
13. MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES
14. GASOLINE, DIESEL 8 OIL 2G7,501 203,102 2151000 265,000 250,000 (d)
15. INSURANCE 58916M 857,352 553,0110 646,000 600,000 (e)
%. MEMBERSHIPS 16,484 14,742 181000 25,000 ,30,000 (T)
".7. OFFICE EXPENSE
18. SUPPLIES 64,144 %,082 84,000 110,MD 110,000 (g)
19. OTHER 43,635 49,510 501000 551000 55,000 (g)
M. OPERATING SUPPLIES
21. CHLORINE 6 ODOR CONTROL - 1,457,451 1,804,810 1,900,000 2,100,000 2,100,000 (h)
22. SULFIDE CONTROL 622,020 605,154 8501000 850,000 110001000 (h)
23. CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 974,948 1,833,150 2,256,000 2,239,000 2,587,000 (i)
Z4. LAB CHEMICALS 8 SUPPLIES 55,788 83,529 1301000 100,0OU 140,000 (j)
25. TOOLS 49,716 75,943 801000 851000 85,000 (j)
26. SOLVENTS, PAINS, 8 JAN. SUPPLIES 145,923 94,562 100,000 150,000 150,000 (j)
27. OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 2381019 198,576 136,000 286,000 200,000 (j)
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III
JOINT OPERATING 8 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5/17/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
1986-87 1997-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90
ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOM1END
29. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
29. GAOUNDSHEEPSNG 27,498 42,775 43,E 67,000 10040 (k)
30. OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES. 62,320 95,903 1251000 1501GOD MOOD (k)
31. SOLIDS REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL 2,281,199 2,767,538 4,351,000 4,400,000 515MIOM (k)
32. OTHER WASTE DISPOSAL 72,737 25,910 153,000 174,000 185,01111 (k)
33. OTHER 209,Mll 240,114 2501000 255,E 63510110 (k)
34. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
35. LEGAL 160,711 267,486 250,000 2501000 275,600 (1)
36. AUDIT 6 ACCOUNTING 21,548 19,978 25,000 25,000 25,000 ll)
37. EENGINEERING 52,373 39,201 10,OW 501000 50,800 (1)
33. OTHER 80,039 139,833 162,0110 1B0,G00 180,0E (1)
37, PRINTING 6 PUBLICATION
40. REPRO-IN-HOUSE 61,508 76,543 82,000 901000 100,000 (m)
41. PRINTING-OUTSIDE 40,437 49,214 30,000 50,000 SO,OOU (0)
42. PHOTO PROCESSING 13,222 19,773 151000 151000 20,000 (m)
43. NOTICES 6 ADS 30,079 26,243 50,000 501000 75,000 (m)
44. RENTS 6 LEASES
45. OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 46,132 4645 78,000 70,000 100,000 (n)
46. DISTRICT EGUIPMENT RENTAL 86,930 105,864 1151000 120,000 100,0E la)
47. REPAIRS 6 MAINTENANCE
48. MATERIALS 2,174,676 2,755,442 3,100,000 3,000,000 3,600,000 (a)
49. CONTRACTS 99,923 123,6C2 115,G00 165,000 165,000 (a)
50. RESEARCH 6 MONITORING
51. OCEAN MONITORING 1,386,889 1,759,596 1,977,000 11990,000 1,700,000 (p)
52. OCEAN/I.W./OPER RESEARCH 2O7,649 184,303 211,000 212,000 370,000 (p)
53. TRAINING, MEETINGS, 8 TRAVEL 53,544 58,854 981000 100,000 125,C00 (q)
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III
JOINT OPERATING 6 ROARING CAPITAL FUNDS 5/17/69
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
19"7 1987-BB 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90
ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND
54. UNCOLJECTABLE ACCOUNTS 118 0 0 2,Oa 2,0010 fr)
55. UTILITIES
56. DIESEL FOR GENBATORS 159,106 116,270 90,m0 250,000 200,000 (s)
57. POWER 4,214,281 3,993,300 4,420,E 5,3a,0a 6,500,MO (sI
58. NATURAL GAS 351,019 113,916 120,aa 316,000 250,000 (s)
59. TELEPHONE 81,227 105,982 1051000 951am 120,000 (s)
60. WATER 66,219 92,332 90,0a 95,000 150,Om (s)
61. OTHER EXPENSES
62. FREIGHT 23,917 35,491 35,000 30,000 4010007 (11
63. GENERAL 158,739 221,745 2a,0a Zm,Om 225,000 (11
64. ARM) OPERATING FEES 0 0 20,E 0 250,000 (Cl
65. PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 53,884 15,546 203,000 50,000 50,000 (u)
66. OTHER NON-OPERATING EXPENSE 19,059 41,805 36,a0 40,000 45,000 (ul
67. TOTAL M1TL, SUPPLIES, 8 SERVICES 16,761,286 19,514,916 22,931,000 24,702,Om 28,89410a
68. COST ALLOCATION{ORF 8 OTHER (160,564) (289,277) (300,000) (Ma'am) 00,ORA) (u)
69. NET J.O, NAT'L, SUPPLIES, 6 SERV 16,600,722 19,225,639 22,631,000 24,402,000 28,50,000 Ix)
70. REVENUE (1,392,542) (1,482,3191 (1,791,000) (1,200,a0) (1,700,0001 (y)
71. NET J.O. EXPENDITURES 26,215,646 30,573,007 34,534,000 38,867,000 44,531,000 (z)
SCHEDULE IV
5/11/89
REV. 5/19/89
NOTES TO JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
(a) Salaries Wa es and Benefits - See attached Schedule V for 1989-90 salaries
an enefits estima es and projected payroll savings.
Estimated 1988-89 salaries and benefits are below budget primarily because
delayed construction schedules allowed positions to remain vacant. For
one-half of the year the Retirement Board reduced the required Districts
contribution by 50%, but the reduction is not expected to last into
1989-90.
(b) Cost Allocations and Direct Char ebacks to CORF and Individual Districts -
Represents direct labor an enefits c argebacks and cost allocation to the
appropriate fund for which the work is actually performed (CORF for work on
treatment plants' capital expansion; respective Capital Facilities funds
for work on individual District's collection facilities capital expansion;
and Operating funds for maintenance and repair) . Also reflects administra-
tive time chargeable to self-funded insurance programs; and Source Control
Division and Laboratory Division charges to respective Districts for
industrial waste monitoring and enforcement program.
(c) Net JO Payroll - This line item represents the net salaries, wages and
benefits chargeable to Joint Operating Fund for administration and
maintenance/operation of the joint works facilities, after chargebacks to
other funds for services performed by the labor pool described above in (b).
(d) Gasoline, Oil and Fuel - This account includes gasoline, oil and diesel
fuel required to operate stationary treatment plant equipment as well as
approximately 300 pieces of major mobile equipment such as vehicles,
cranes, etc.
(e) Insurance - Includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee
fidelity bond, all-risk (earthquake and flood) policy, fire, boiler and
machinery policies. The major elements of this account are $323,000 for
$35 million in coverage provided by the comprehensive all-risk policy and
$258,000 for in-lieu premiums to increase the reserve levels in the
self-insured public liability fund pursuant to the Boards' decision to
fully self-insure liability risk.
(f) Memberships - Districts' memberships in Association of Metropolitan
Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) , California Association of Sanitation Agencies
(CASA), Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) , and Long Beach
Safety Council . Current year expenses and 1989-90 appropriations include a
fee for membership in AMSA's Conference of Coastal Agencies (CCA) , which
works specifically on legislative and regulatory matters relative to ocean
disposal issues.
(g) Office Expense - This account includes supplies, farms, small office
equipment, drafting materials and postage for all departments.
Page Two SCHEDULE IV
(h) Chlorine 8 Odor Control Chemicals - The Districts presently use chlorine,
and sodium hydroxide caustic soda) as primary odor control chemicals in
the treatment plants. Usage of chlorine is expected to decrease by
$440,000 during the year as the clarifier covers and foul air scrubbers
are placed into service. Caustic soda use in the foul air scrubbers at
both plants however, is expected to increase over 300% as new scrubbers are
placed into service. Caustic soda is also added to trunklines to control
hydrogen sulfide in the lines, and $285,000 has been added to the chemical
budget for the Joint Works' share of this expense.
Ferrous chloride use, required to control hydrogen sulfide levels in our
digester gas as required by AQMD Rule 431.1, will decrease by $85,000,
partially as a result of increased ferric chloride for physical/chemical
treatment.
During the course of this year, we expect to optimize use of the various
odor control chemicals, but expect our overall usage levels and budget
requirements to remain high as we maintain compliance with increasingly
stringent air quality regulations and bring 20 additional foul air
scrubbers on line.
(i) Chemical Coagulants - We expect that the polymer usage level increase in
1989-90 will be partially offset by lower unit prices resulting in a net
increase of $91,000 for the material . Polymer is added to the influent
wastewater along with ferric chloride via the physical/chemical treatment
systems at both plants to improve solids removal efficiencies in the
primary clarifier basins. It is also added to digested sludge prior to
dewatering to cause the sludge to coagulate to improve the sludge and water
separation process.
Ferric chloride is used as a backup chemical in the event the primary
chemical distribution systems are out of service for repairs or
maintenance, but primarily for enhanced primary physical/chemical clarifier
performance. Physical/chemical treatment systems will be fully installed
and operational at both plants this year, and we expect to increase our use
of ferric chloride in these systems by $262,000 to control hydrogen sulfide
emissions and improve solids removal efficiencies in the primary basins.
(j) Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as scrubber acids,
activated carbon, solvents, cleaners, hardware, janitorial supplies, tools,
laboratory supplies, etc. required to operate and maintain existing and
expanding facilities.
(k) Contractual Services - The major component of this category is sludge
removal and disposal . Contracts have been executed with Recyc Inc. , Pima
Gro and Curti Enterprise for agricultural reuse of residual solids. The
Coyote Canyon landfill is capable of accepting less and less solids as its
ultimate closure approaches, the Coyote tipping fee will increase 50% on
July 1, 1989 and no replacement site has yet been approved within the
county. A total of $5.5 million has been budgeted for solids removal and
disposal .
Page Three SCHEDULE IV
This account also includes appropriations for groundskeeping services,
toxics removal services, outside laboratory services, trash pickup, plant
site sweeping, data processing system maintenance and support services, and
temporary help to level out periodic increases in staff workload and
staffing levels. A maintenance and operations contract is anticipated in
the next year for the Plant 2 oxygen generation plant and $400,000 has been
budgeted for that service contract.
(1) Professional Services - Includes General Counsel , special labor counsel ,
CPA audit and miscellaneous accounting, data processing, engineering and
other consulting services.
(m) Printing and Publications - Budget allows for in-house and outside
reproduction costs and reflects expanded management information system and
increasingly complex administrative requirements, as well as continuing
demand by public and regulatory agencies for information on Districts'
activities. The continuing efforts of our Public Information Officer (PIO)
to improve our public education program on Districts' activities is also
reflected in the increased budget for this line item.
(n) Rents and Leases - This account includes cost accounting system charges to
the Joint Operating Fund for Districts-owned equipment, and outside
equipment rental for major equipment used for emergency repairs. The
1989-90 allocation has been increased slightly to reflect the increased
usage levels of large equipment required over the past four years to
support major repairs and maintenance in our upgraded and expanded
facilities.
(o) Repairs and Maintenance - This item, which is for parts and services for
repair of plant facilities, reflects an authorization to allow for routine
equipment maintenance. Should this increased allocation prove to be
insufficient in the event of major unexpected equipment failures and/or
repairs, a transfer from the unappropriated reserves of the individual
Districts would be necessary to meet the increased obligation.
(p) Research and Monitoring - $1,600,000 in this account is for contract
services to carry out the extensive ocean monitoring program required by
EPA Region IX under the provisions of the Districts' NPDES permit, which
became effective April 1, 1985. This budget decrease does not reflect a
reduced effort or program, but a reallocation of specific projects to
Districts' staff. The account also includes the Districts' contribution to
the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) being
conducted under a joint powers agreement with other Southern California
municipal dischargers, and also provides for some operational research and
evaluation to develop optimum operating parameters in the treatment plants.
(q) Training, Meetings and Travel - Expanding activities of regulatory
agencies have required increased Board member and staff travel in recent
years. It is expected that considerable travel will continue to be
required in connection with our continued efforts to obtain an extension of
our NPDES permit conditions. Also includes ongoing technical training and
Page Four SCHEDULE IV
materials for staff, expansion of our supervisory training program to help
provide supervisors with the necessary training to more effectively manage
their Divisional groups, and required training for new computerized control
systems and other "high tech" equipment.
(r) Uncollectible Accounts - For miscellaneous accounts that are determined by
the General Counsel and Director of Finance to be uncollectible.
(s) Utilities - The $6.5 million allocation for purchased power in this item
reflects a $1.2 million increase over 1988-89 budgeted levels due to
anticipated completion of additional air scrubbers and electric motors at
the new Ocean Outfall Booster Station.
(t) Other Operating Expenses - Expenses not chargeable elsewhere, such as
freight and miscellaneous items, and annual permit renewal fees and
penalties assessed by the SCAQMD.
(u) Expenses Applicable to Prior Years - Represents adjustments to an operating
or non-operating account balance from previous years.
(v) Other Non-Operating Expenses - Miscellaneous items not chargeable
elsewhere.
(w) Cost Allocation and Direct Chargebacks to CORF and Individual Districts -
For materials, supplies and services cost allocation and chargebacks for
same purposes as described above under (b).
(x) Net JO Materials, Supplies and Services - This line item represents the net
materials, supplies and services chargeable to the Joint Operating Fund for
administration and maintenance and operation of the Joint Works Facilities,
after chargebacks to other funds.
(y) Net Revenues - Budget amount is for sales of various sewage treatment
process by-products, revenues from the wastehauler disposal facilities at
Plant No. 1, sampling chargebacks to individual Districts, and miscellaneous
items.
(z) Net JO Requirements - This line item represents the net Joint Operating
Requirements after reduction of the Total Joint Operating Requirements by
the revenues generated from sale of by-products, charges to other agencies,
and other miscellaneous operating revenues. l
JOINT OPERATING FUND SCHEDULE V
(AND WORKING CAPITAL REVOLVING FUND) 5/11/89
PROJECTED SALARIES & BENEFITS
1989-90
Anticipated
At Full Payroll Recommended
Employment Savings Budget
SALARIES & WAGES 20,820,000 2,290,000 18 530,000 1
BENEFITS:
1. Retirement 3,801,000 417,000 3,384,000 (2a
2. Workers' Compensation 155,000 -0- 155,000 (2b
3. Unemployment Insurance 25,000 -0- 25,000 (2c
4. Group Medical
- Self-Funded (includes 1,359,000 135,000 1,224,000 (2d
transfers)
- HMO 264,000 24,000 240,000
- Life 51,000 6,000 45,000
5. Uniforms 94,000 10,000 84,000 (2e
6. Total Benefits 5,749,000 592,000 5,157,000
TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND BENEFITS 26,569,000 2,882,000 23,687,000
NOTES:
1) Salaries & Wages - Full employment projection based on the assumption that all 537
authorized permanent positions and the 44 Summer Work Program positions are filled as set
forth in the personnel recommendations. Because of our ability to sometimes temporarily
minimize staffing by adjusting plant operational modes, personnel turnover and strict
controls on filling vacancies, we have targeted our payroll cost at $23.7 million next
year (13.5% over the 1988-89 budget) which will realize a payroll savings of $2,882,000.
If, however, turnover and vacancies are lower, it may be necessary to allocate additional
funds from the unappropriated reserve accounts of the individual Districts.
2) Benefits - Remarks above under Salaries and Wages regarding full employment of
authorized positions also apply to benefits.
(a) Retirement - The Districts' employees are members of the Orange County Employees
Retirement Sykem pursuant to our MOU' s.
SCHEDULE V
Page Two
5/11/89
(b) Workers' Compensation - Amount includes total estimated expenditures for the
workers' compensation program set forth in detail in the enclosed Workers'
Compensation Self-Insured Fund Budget on Schedule VI. An appropriation of $155,000
is recommended for 1989-90 to maintain the current level of accumulated reserves as
recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee.
(c) Unemployment Insurance - Because of reserves credited to our account in the
State Unemployment Insurance Fund, only $25,000 in contributions were required for
the last year. We anticipate making similar contributions in 1989-90.
(d) Group Medical - Includes the Districts' share of employee medical plan benefits
for the prepaid HMO plans, the estimated total costs of the self-funded indemnity
plan and the life insurance premiums. Schedule VII details the expected costs of
the self-funded plan and the second of three annual increased employee contributions
included in current MOUs. The recommended budget increase reflects our increased
staffing level .
(a) Uniforms - This budget projection is in accordance with employee MOU' s. We have
again been able to obtain favorable bids for uniform rental , and the unit costs of
uniform service have not increased for several years.
JOINT NORMS OPERATING BUDGET
WORKERS' COMPENSATION SELF-INSURED FUND SCHEDULE VI
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR 5/03/89
1908-89 1989-90
1908-89 ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED
EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET
............................................................
1. Salaries. Wages and Benefits 15,000 14,532 16,000
2. Benefits/Claiss 100,000 100,000 110,000
S. Contractual Services 12,000 12,024 13,000
4. Legal Services 5,000 0 5,000
S. Professional Services 17,000 22,788 25,000
6. Supplies 6 Other 11000 0 1,000
7. Sub-Total 150,000 149,344 170,000
8. Excess Loss Policy 40,000 30,2B5 40,000
9. Total Expenditures 190,000 179,629 210,000
REVENUES 6 RESERVES
10. In-Lieu Preeiues 134,000 134,000 155,000
11. Interest 6 Miscellaneous 56,000 59,912 55,000
12. Total Revenues 190.000 193,912 210,000
12. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 0 14,283 0
13. Reserves and Transfers 708,000 685,069 699,000
14. Ending Reserves 708,000 699,352 699,000
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET
SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN TRUST FUND SCHEDULE VII
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR 5/12/89
1988-89 1989-90 1989-90
1988-89 ESTIMATED AT FULL PAYROLL RECOMMENDED
EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES EMPLOYMENT SAVINGS BUDGET
.........................
1. Claus - Medical 926,000 745,980 1,045,000 (lO5,000) 910,000
2. - Disability 11,000 45,753 31,000 (3,000) 28,000
3. - Long Tore Disability 0 48,715 99,000
4. - Dental 117,000 161,964 210,000 (2121.000) ,000
000) 189,000
S. Sub-Total 1,054,000 1,002,412 11385.000 (138,000) 1,247,000
7. Contractual Services 47,000 37,714 47,000 (5,000) 42,000
6. Stop Lass Insurance 95,000 73,309 93,000 (9,000) 94,000
8. Total Expenditures 1,196,000 1,113,435 1,525,000 (152,000) 1,373,000
REVENUES 6 RESERVES
9. In-Lieu Premiums From - CSDOC 790,000 640,690 1,112,000 (111.000) 1,001,000
- Employee 135,000 118,324 171,000 (17,000) 154,000
10. Interest 6 Miscellaneous 0 17,952 0 0 0
11. Reimburse from Stop Loss Insurance 0 0 0 0 0
12. Total Revenue 925,000 776,966 1,283,000 (128,000) 1,155,000
13. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) (271,000) (336,469) (242,000) 24,000 (218,000)
14. Transfers 304,000 260,000 247.000 (24,000) 223,000
15. Beginning Reserves 198,000 231,665 198,000 155,000
16. Ending Reserves 231,000 155,196 203,000 0 160,000
JOINT NORMS OPERATING BUDGET
PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF-INSURED FUND SCHEDULE VITT
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR 5/03/09
1988-89 1989-90
L908-89 ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED
EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET
--------------------------------------------------------
1. Salaries, Wages and Benefits 1.000 0 1.000
2. Benefits/Claims 20,000 8,736 20,000
3. Contractual Services 8,000 e,522 8,000
a. Legal Services 15,000 40,000 25,000
5. Professional Services 11000 0 1,000
6. Supplies a Other 1,000 0 1,000
7. Sub-Total 46,000 53,258 56,000
8. Excess Loss Policy 265,000
9. Total Expenditures 46,000 53,258 321,000
REVENUES 6 RESERVES
10. In-Lieu Premiums 258,000 258,000 258,000
11. Interest 6 Miscellaneous 75,000 123,272 120,000
12. Allocation to Other Funds 10,000 0 0
12. Total Revenues 343,000 381,272 378,000
12. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 297,000 328.014 57,000
13. Reserves and Transfers 1,255,000 1,320,373 1,648,000
14. Ending Reserves 1,552.000 1,648,387 1,705,000
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
JOINT WORKS CAPITAL OUTLAY
REVOLVING FUND
PNITA'floV
50`topolitan pro 4!)IS�
9e
p S'ace
)'GE COON
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
ADOPTED JUNE 14, 1989
CORF A.U.S
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE A
AND COMPARISON TO LAST YEAR
1989-90 1989-90 1988-89
BUDGET COMPARABLE
DISTRICT EQUITY BUDGET BEGINNING GRANT BUDGET
PERCENT REQUIREMENTS RESERVES FUNDS —REQUIREMENTS
1 10.44% 10.724.000 11.350,000 287,000 9.859,000 (a)
2 28.78% 29.564.000 45,815,000 790.000 27,354.000
3 31.26% 32,112.000 39,217,000 858,000 29,540,000
5 5.12% 5,260.000 1,856.000 140.000 4.967,000 (a)
6 4.83% 4,962,000 1,776,000 133,000 4,711.000 (a)
7 6.84% 7,026.000 16,471,000 188.000 6.126,000
11 6.91% 71098,000 2.592,000 190,000 6,791,000 (a)
13 0.13% 134.000 3.100,000 3.000 95.000
14 5.69% 5,845,000 156,000 5,537.000 (b)
TOTAL 100.00% 102.725.000 122,177,000 2.745.000 94.980,000
(a) Long-range financial projections indicate these Districts may need to issue debt in 1989-90
(b) Funds will be provided by required deposits form IRND
CURF39 1.ELS CAPI7AL OUTLAY REVOLVING IUNC SCBBOULI B-1 $11719 10:01 AN
BUNNART of JOINT IORAS CONSTRUCTION RIQVIRIKIITS Page 1
1989.1990 TO 1998.1999
A B C 0 1 1 G N I J I
ISTINATED I ISTINATID I I RIpUIRID 9671HATID I ISTIK479D I ISTINATED I ISTINBTID II fly[ I 1311UTIO I TIR II 627 TO
FROM? I C.I.P. II BUDGET BROOKS I SUNNIT I BODGBT I BUOGIT 11 IRAN I BUDGIT 1 1141 II CORPLITI
TOTAL I 6/30161 II 1961-90 1 1190.91 1 ID91-92 1 1592-93 1 1953.14 II TOTAL 1 1991.99 1 TOTAL 11 PROIICTR
..............I............ 11............ ............ I............ ------------ ----------- II............ I............ ............ 11 ...........
I II I I I I II I I II
1. New and lebudgeted Kept Projects I I I I I II I I II
I II I I I I II I I II
A. Reclamation Plant I II I I I I II I I II
1. Expansion to 80 NON, PI-16-1 11,537,0001 100,000 537,0001 3,000,0001 22,000,400 1,900,00011 17,537,0001 I 17,537,00011
2. Neidworks IIo.2 I Plant 10.1, P1.20/f1.31 39,05,0001 35,455.00011 4,000,000 I I I II 11000,0001 I 4,000,00011
3. Odor Control facilities I I I II I I
a. Covers for Primary Basins, PI-25 1,361,000I 1,211,000 II 100,000 I II 100,000I I 100,000 II
A. Soul Air Scrobber System, PI.26 2,101,0001 2,201,00011 200,040 - II 200,004 I I Mooa011
1. Bntrancea/Secorty/Interior loads/Liadscaping FI.27 3,561,000 11561,00011 900,000 500,0001 600,0001 II 2,000,0001 I 2,000,0001
S. Primary Clariliers Nos. 6-15, PI.33 40,811,000 811,00011 12,000,004 15,000,000 12,000,000I 1,000,0001 II 40,000,0001 I 40,000,00011
6. Digesters 11.16 and Gas Rsadllag System, P1-31.1 31,760,000 1 215,00011 12,000,000 1 13,555,000 1 12,000,0001 1,040,0001 11 31,555,0001 1 31,555,00011
7. Sludge DRAMAS facilities, PI-31-2 22,500,000 1 100,00011 10,000,000 1 10,000,000 1 2,400,0001 1 22,100,0001 1 12,160,000 II
S. Rebabilitattoo of Digesters 7 f 8, PI-35-1 21553,000 1 243,00011 1,250,000 1 100,000 1 1 1 2,350,0001 1 2,3SO,BOO 11
9. Rebabilitition of Digesters 9 1 10, Pi45.2 3,500,000 1 11 1 1 2,000,0001 1,500,0001 II 3,500,0001 1 3,500,001 II
1D. Underground Tank Replacemeat at Plant 1, 1-027-1 556,0001 511,00011 10,0001 1 10,0001 1 10,000 I1
11. fuel System Improvements, 1-033-1 170,0001 10,000 II 150,0001 1 150,0001 1 150,000 II
12. Central Air Compressor Statloa 250,0001 11 1 50,0001 200,0001 1 II 250,0001 1 250,00011
13, Electrification Project 2,100,0001 II 10010001 11000,0001 11000,0001 1 II 2,100,oao 1 1 2.100,00011
14. Primary Trealmeat 36 HD 16,250,0001 11 100,060 1 310001000 1 91000,0001 4,150,0001 II 16,250,0001 1 16,250,00011
13. Primary Trenchant 16 AND 16,250,0001 1 1 1 1 1II 1 16,250,000 1 16,250,00011
16. Belt Presses it Units) 14,300,0001 II 1 1,500,000 1 6,400,0011 6,400,0001 II 14,300,0001 1 14,300,00011
17. Raw Sewage Emergency Bypass 1,992,0001 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1,992,0041 1,192,00011
16. DAPS: 3110' Diameter 4,160,0001 11 100,0001 1,500,0001 1,500,0001 760,0001 11 4,160,0001 1 4,160,000 II
19. Solids Storage 11 Banal 10,177,0001 II I _ I I 1 II . 1 5,577,0001 5,511,00011 1'500,006
20, Standby Power Recitation i,DS,000 11 I 1 21304,0061 51135,00011 7,135,0001 I 7,135,00011
21, Ncoltoriagleoatrol System 5,070,000 11 1.000,0001 2,470,0001 1,600,000 I 1 11 51070,0001 I 5,070,00011
22. Digesters: 11110' Diameter 91100,000 II I I 900,4001 3.200,0001 3,200,00011 7,300,0001 1,000,0001 9,100,00011
23. Remove Trickling Yilters 111 1,100,1001 II I 11300,0001 11 11300,0001 1 1,300,00011
24. i2Av Electrical Power Distribution 2,/77,000 II I 000,00011 600,0001 1,677,0001 2,477,00011
25. 10 BUD Galles Activated Sludge 6 OAF'[ 65,1411000 11 I II 655,000 1 655,000 11 61,110,000
26. xisc. Protect[ 10,000,000I 11 1,000,060I 1,000,000I 1,010,Ogo I 1,000,000I 1,000,000II 5,000,0001 S,001,000I 10,000,00011
........... .......... 11 .......... 1 ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I .......... 11 ........... 1 .......... I ........... 11 ...........
SUB-70TAL - RBCLINATION PLAIT 1 319105000 1 12,125,00011 11,710.0001 50,212,0001 $3,600,000 1 34,610,0001 12,335,00011 195,067,060 31,951,0001 221,011,00011 69,101,000
...........I .......... 11 .......... I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I .......... 11 ........... I .......... ........... 11 ...........
COBEB9_i.IIS CAPITAL OUILAB REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1 1117111 10:01 AN
SUMMARY DF JOINT NUMBS CONSTRUCTION 119011INIOTS Page 2
1969-1990 TO 191E.1999
A 6 C D 1 2 G A I J I
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED II REQUIRED I ESTIMATED I ESTIM71D I ESTIMATED I ISTINATBD 11 FIVE I ESTIMATED I TIN II COST TO
PIOJICT C.F.P. 11 BUDGET BUDGET I BUDGET BOOGIT BUDGET 11 TEAM BUDGET 1 TEAM 11 COMPLETE
TOTAL I 6/30189 II 1991-90 I 1990-91 1951-92 1992-93 1993-94 It TOTAL 1931-55 I TOTAL 1 PIOJICTS
..............I------------ II------------ I------------ I------------ I------------ I----------- It------------ I...-.------. I............ 11 -----------
A. Treatment Plant 2 1 11
1. Additional IDS Foot Digester 3,695,000 1 II I I I II 2,115,000 2,I15,000 II 1,750,000
2. Operations Building, P2-23-S-1 3,125,0001 II 500,0001 1,800,0001 025,0001 I II 3,125.0001 3,115,000 II
3. Upgrade Activated Sludge System, Pb SO 7,J00,000 1 II 100,000 1 1,000,000 1 4,000,000 1 2,700,000 1 II 7,000,000 1 7,100,000 II
1. Additional OAF 2,600,000E II 100,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1 501,000 1 11 2,600,0001 I 2,600,000 II
5. odor Coatrol Facilities II I I II I II
a. ?Itself musics 'A' thin 'Q' Covers, P2-32 5,511,0001 5,064,000 150,000 I I I II 150,000 I 9s0,000
b. 1.1 Air 5cr4lbers System, P2-33 6,581,0001 6,133,000 I 250,OD0 1 I I I II 250,000E 250,000 II
C. leprDeent6 t0 Grit Facility B, 01111196 TOOOeI I I I II 11
and Distribution Structure A, P2-31 6,201,000 E 6,159,000 II 50,000 I 1 1 11 50,0001 1 50,000 11
6. Laadscape Bud Support facilities II I I I I II 'I I II
a. Vareboase Building, P2-35-2 1,950,000 I 500,000 2,200,000 T,210,000 I I 1,150,000 E 4,950,000 11
I. Mainlmaace Building , 12-35-3 1,200,0001 100,000 2,500,000 1,600,000 1 I II /,200,0001 1,200,000 II
c. Construction Management Office, P2-35-1 1,288,000 500,000 700,000 88,000 1 I 1,180,000 1 1.2881000 11
d. Phase 11 Site aad Security Improvements, P2-35-5 2,300,000 100,DDO 1,300,000 1 900,000 1 I I Z,100,000I I 2,300,000 II
1. Misc NOdifas 6 lmprovements to Facilities, P2-37 7,162,000 1 1,B2,000 It 2,300,DD0 I I I I It 2,300,8001 2,300,000 II
A. lebabilitati DO of Digesters I,J,I,L,M,X a D, 12-39 6,170,000 176,000 II 3,000,D00 3,000,000 I I I I 6,000,000 6,000.0QD 11
5. Process Control Coaputer Monitor leprovemeats, P2-10 270,000 20,000 II 250,000 I I I I 250,000 E 250,000
10. Primary Treatment 24 NGD,P2-61 11,300,000 E II 500,000 6,400,000 6,400,000 1,000,000E II 14,100,000 1 I 14,300,000 II
it. Understand taut 1'-placemmat, 1-027-2 510,000 E 511,060 II 10,000 1 I I I 10,000 10,000
12. Fuel System Improvement6, 1-033-2 170.0001 20,00911 150,000 1 I I I Ise'DOO I 150,000 11
11. 07erflou Pump Station 250,000 t II 1 50,000 200,000 F II 250,000 250.000 11
If. Electrification Pro)eet 6,500,0001 11 200,0001 4,000,0001 2,300,0001 1 1 5,500,0061 61500,000 It
15. Soilds Storage: 2 Bins 1,200,0001 I 400,000 I 2,100,000 2,000,000 I S,200,000 $1200,00011
16. Potable later Distribution System 3.809,000 I 100,000 300,000 E 1,505,000 3,009,000 II
17. Monitor iog.¢ontrol System 5,330,0001 I 10,000 I 600,0001 3,700,000 1,000,000 5,330,000 5,330,000 II
H. Standby Power Generation 9,200,000 I I I 1 I 9,100,000 I 9,200,000 II
19. Plant Dater Pump station 1,110,000 I II I I 111101000 11170,000 II
20. Misc. Protects 10.000,000 I 1,0OD,a0a 1 1,000,000 1 1,000,000 1 1,000,000 1 1,000,000 11 5,000,000 1 5,000,000 1 10,000,000 11
----------- ---------- I I ---------- ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 11 ----------- I ---------- I ----------- 11 --- -------
SUB-707AL - 7111TMEAT PLANT 2 110,561,000 23,184,00011 10,010,000 25,950,000 26,663,0001 8,600,0001 1,300,000 11 72,603,000 1 21,024,000 1 53,627,00011 1,750,000
----------- ---------- II ---------- ---------- ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 11 ---------- ---------- I ----------- I1 -----------
COP189 1.ILS CAPITAL OUTLAY RI6OLMING FUND SCRIDDLi 1-1 s!u/u m:11 AN
SUNMAIT of JOINT BORIS COISTIDCIIOI ILDDINININTS Page 1
1991-1590 TO 1998-1999
A B 0 6 L G tl 1 J 1
ISTIMILD I ISTIMATLD I ISgUI11D ISTIMATED I 1371UTIO I IBTIMATID ISTINATID I Flgl I ISTItlATID I ?go COST TO
PIOJICT 1 O.I.P. BUDGIT I BUDGIT BUDGIT 000017 I BUDGIT II IIAI I BOOGIT TIAI I COMPL@I
TOTAL I I I I IIPJICS......... _ --
C. lecliaatlon Plant $life I II I I II I I II
I. Site AnquISItinn 15,000,0001 II bsoo,DOO 10,500,040 I II 15,006,000I I 15,000,000II
2. Reflmsalin9 Pilot 3 62:000:000 II 100:000 I -1000000 ESIB0:000 I 11:080:000 I 11:000:A00 11s0000000 i]SOO00000 I 62E000:000 II -----------
SUB-707AL - RECLAMATION PLANTS it 000 000 I ------- -I I 1 f00 000 I 10 600 000 3 100 000 I le OOo 000 1 11 000 000 S/ 000 000 EI 000 000 it A00 000 I I -----------
D. mterplaat and Joint II I I II I I II
1. Admin. Building U.pin. L Rehab. J-7-4, J-7-5 5,740,000 1 IM0,000 11 2,000,000 1 1 II 2,000,000 1 2,000,000 11
2. lebab/Conv Last Lab to Office at Pit 1, J-11-1 900,000 1 II 50,000 1 50,000 1 $00,001 I I II f00,000 I 900,0101
3. Dutfall Booster Station, J-15,J-15A 31,269,000 1 25,7/9,000 11 1,500,0001 1 1 1 11 1,500,000 1 1 I,S00,Ooo 11
4. Central Laboratory, J-11 7.775,000 1 275,000 11 1,000,0001 3,000,0001 500,000 1 1 7,500,0001 7,500,00011
S. Central Geoeratioo Facility 1 II 1 1 1 1 II 1 11
1. Equipaenl Prepurchase, J-10 22,000,000 1 5,040,000 11 11,000,0001 1,000.0001 1,001,000 1 1,000,0061 1,110,00011 11,001,0001 I 17,000,000 II
I. [Mission Purchase, J-19B 11050,000 1 3,050,000 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11
C. Plant I Facility, 3-15.1 15,199,500I 19f,500 II 3,000,OIO 1 8,000,0061 1,000,000 1 1 11 15,100,0001 1 IS,0011,00011
d. Plant 2 Facility, J-19-2 2S,799,5001 199,S00 II 1,000,0001 12,000,6001 (,000,0001 1 I 25,000,0001 1 25,000,10011
6. Narehouse/Naittenance Mir. 1 Oil Dock, J-20 3,684,000 1 1,314,00011 2,500.0001 1 1 1 II 2,500,0001 1 2,S00,000 11
7. waste Gas rlares,J-31, J-21A 7621000 1 112,000 II 650,000 1 I I 650,000 1 650,000 11
8. cut!ill a Booster Pulp stations 1 II 1 I I 1 11
a. Replacement of 18. Oulfall Serer, J-22-1 ILmsd) 2,029,000 1 29,00011 1,000,000 1 500,000 1 100,000 1 2,000,000 1 I 2,000,000 11
R. Replace Dutfall No. 1 Land Section, J-22-2 2,411,000 1 II I I 21010,00011 21600,0001 111,000 1 2,441,000 II
c. yet Surge Tower No. I, J-22-1 1.300,000 1 II I I 1,000,000 11 1,000,000 1 300,000 1 1,300,000 II
d. leap III Station for Outfall No. I E,6GO,D00 11 I I 11 1 2,601,000 1 2,604,000 11
e. Second Discharge Heider DOSS 'C' 3.960,000 I I I 400,000 II 100,000I 3,566,000 1 3,50,000 11
f. Extend 76' to Deep Niter With 120- Outlall 36,209,000 1 11 1 1 I 1 11 1 25,011,000 1 29,011,000 11 7,200,000
9. Operations Building, J-21-1 A 2 3,508,0001 1,00011 I,S00,000 1 2,000,000 1 - 1 1 3,500,0001 1 000,000 II
ID. IOfIttat rlevieler and text r1cility,J-2412n/211 500,0001 II SD0,0o0I I 1 I II 510,0001 seo,oho 11
11. Personnel Building at Pll 1, J-26 908,000I 100,000 I 500,000 I 3881000 1 I 981,0001 f1I,000 11
12. Electrical Power Systems Rehabilitation 3,000,000I 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 3,001,000 1 3,000,000 11
13. lartbquale Preparedness 7,105,0001 I 400,000 1 400,0001 330,040 I 130,0001 110,000 II 1,110,000 1,52S,000 1,115,000 II 1,S90,000
IL loterplant tacllltes, 1.9 I I II
a. 120' Interplant line 17,600,000 II 2,800,000 I 12,400,000 1 12,400,000 1 I I 21'ao.n0 1 I 27,600,000 11
b. Iaterplist Utility Chase 1,040,000 II 040,000 1 3,600,000 1 3,600,000 1 1 1,040,000 1 1 1,010,000 11
c. Industrial water Line 600,000I I 60,000I 270,0001 270,010 1 1 1 600,000 1 1 BOMBS II
d. Digester Gas Lice 900.000 II 100,000 1 400,00 1 400,600 1 1 900,000 1 1 500,000 11
A. COLML41Citi095 Cable 120,000 I II 10,000 1 55,000 1 55.000 I 1 II 120,000 1 1 I20,DoO 11
15. Sludge Disposal I I 11 I 1 11
a. Colpcst Demooslration Pilot 9,000,000 1 2,750,000 1 1,100,000 II 9.001,0001 1 9,060,000.11
D. Laud Aquisiliom 22.900,9DO II 1,000,006 II 1,010,000 ( 21,000,500 22,000,00E 11
c. Landfill Development Phase I 2a,600,000 I I 13,001,000 I 13,000,000 Is,600,000
d. Cceposl Facility 50.400,000 I I 5,040,000 5,040,001 IS,110,000
16, Bl,hard Iotesplaot IepliCtIMFL 26,110,000 1 11 I 1 12,000,000 1 12,606,000 11 11,316,000
17, Nlsc MIMI 5: . g 4 0- 0I O0I -----------
SUB-TOAL - 1I MPLAYT L JOINT 355,516 000 I 10 9fi6 000 II 11 510 000 I I7 015 000 I 1 11] OOD 1 51 000 I 12 SID 000 II T 911 000 I 91 OI2 D00 E29 O50 000 I li Si00010
SUB-lOTAL - MAJOR PROJLCIS 39D,911 000 I 10a vs Doo II IDO 510 000 117 Bat ODO I 111 106 000 15 110 000 I 11 I65 000 I I55 fSd 000 I I11 077 000 6E6 HS D00 I I51 F71.000
CORF89_I,IL6 S/11/19 10:A1 AM
CAPITAL 017LAT REVOLVING FUND SCHOOLS B-1
SUMMARY DP JOINT GOING CONSTRUCTION BIQUIRENIES Page 1
1909-1990 To 1996-1159
A B C D B P G tl I J 6
ESTIMATED I ESTIMATED REQUIRED ESTIMATED l ESTIMATED ESTIMATED I ISTIMATRO IIVI ESTIMATED I TIN COST TO
PROJECT I C.I.P. 11 BUDGET 1 BUDGET BUDGE BUDGET BUDGET TEAR BUDGE I ISBN I COMPLETE
TOTAL I 6/30109 II 1509-50 I 1590-51 199E-92 1992-93 I 1993-51 II TOTAL I 199E-51 I TOTAL 11 PROJECTS
.............. ............ 11----..------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------ I I ------....-
2. special Flolects - I II I I I II I I II
I II I I I I II I I II
A. Master Plan/EIR Reports I II I I I II I I II
1. Action Plan - imvirouaeatal Assessment Program 607,000 107,000 II 200,000 300,000 II 500,000 I 500,000 II
1. Action Plan - Community Outreach Program %,600 302,000 25,000 10,000 I 5,000 I II 40,000 I 40,000
3. Action ?lam - facilities Plan/Master Plan 2,117,000 2,211,000 50,000 I I I II 50,000 I $0,000
1. Action Plan - Legislative/Rsgularory Program 41,000 1 11,000 II 25,000 I I I II 25,000 I 25,000
5. Anion Plan - It...Coal Plan 90,000 80,00011 10,000 1 1 1 11 I0,0oo I 10,000 II
6. Atkin Plan - AIDES Permit Application 51,000 13,000 II 20,000 I I II 20,000 I I 20,000 II
7. Action Plan - Management 6 Ciordloalion 36,000 26,00011 10,000 I I 1 II 10,000 1 1 10,000 11
B. Solids Treatment aid Disposal Projects 196,000 1 46,00011 50,0001 50,000 1 50,000 1 11 150,000 1 1 150,000
C. Deep Ocean Disposal Evaluative 589,000 1 579,00011 1 10,000 II 10,0001 I 10,000 II
D. Air Quality Control Program I II I II I I II
1. Air Yclivs Inventory (AB25BF) 100,000 II 50,000 E 25,0001 25,000 1 1 11 100,000 1 100,000 11
2. VOC/BOG FACT Deioislration Program 250,000 1 II 50,000 1 75,000 1 75,000 1 25,000 1 25,000 11 250,000 1 I 250,000 11
1. Chemival handling and Control liprovemeits 25,000 II 10,000 E 15,000 E I I 25,000 1 I 25,000 11
1. Ocean Discharge Compliance Program I II I II I 1 II
1. Bleassy Pro7ecl 50,000 II 15,0001 20,0001 15,000 1 II 50,000 1 I 50,000 II
2. Does. Monitoring studies 150,000 50,0001 50,0001 50,000 1 1 11 150,000 1 I 150,000 11
3. Tomes Reduction Evaluation (TEE) Pro]ecl 250,000 II 1 50,0061 200,000 1 11 250,000 1 I 250,000 11
G. Source Control and Waste Management Program I I I I II 1 I II
I. In-Mouse Marardous Waste Xauagemeat Program 25,000 1 11 15,000 1 10,0001 I I 25,000 1 I 25,000
2. Yruiihne X)D1ter1ng 320.000 1 11 20,000 1 150.0001 150,000 I 1 II 320,000 I 320,000 11
3. Waste Mansmiration 70,000 I II 30,000 40,0001 II 70,000 I 70,000 II
1. Permanent MOUStIDld Waste Collection Sites 250,000 II 125,000 125.000 1 1 250,000 1 I 250,000 11
B. LiEoratcry Development Program id5,000 I II 25,000 100,0001 1 125,000 1 1 1251000 II
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- I ---------- I ---------- ---------- 11 ----------- I ---------- ----------- 11 --.--------
SUB-TOTAL - SPECIAL PIGJFC75 5,118,000 I I,Ea,000 11 565.000 1 595.0001 E0,004 1 25,0001 35,00011 1,110,000 1 I 1,640,000.11
...........1 ---------- 11 ---------- ---------- 1 ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 11 ----------- I ---------- 1 ----------- 11 .--.-------
3. Eguipaevl Items 32,550.000 1 11650.000 11500,000 I 1,250,000 1 1,250,000 1 1,250,000 11 6,900,000 1 6,250,000 1 13,150,000 11 19,400,000
..---......I ---------- I I ---------- ---------- 1 ---------- ---------- ---------- 11 ----------- ---------- ----------- -----------
TOTAL JOINT YCRMS CIPITAL EEpERENEGTE 928,616,000 I 110.053,000 ll 102,725,000 115,932,000 I 113,076,OOD 67,015,000 15,450,000 11 464,190,000 177,287,000 1 611,465,000 171,078,000
,:,:a:::::::1 ::::,,::::: 11 ::::::::::: ::::::::::: I ::::::::::: :::::::::: :::::::::: 11 ::::::::::: ::::::::::: 1 ::::::::::: :::::::::::
TOTAL WITH St INFLATION PER YEAR 1,131,791,116 110,053,000 IOZ,725,000 111,720,600 121.666,150 17,570,211 55,247,718 502,942,877 250,051,839 752,997,716 3ie,710,100
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SCHEDULE
UI89C
COAT EQUIPMENT BUDGET
1989-90
IRUCCS B OTHER MACHINE COMMUN INSTA B TEST SAFETY OFFICE
OFpI VEHICLES X08ILE EQ. EQ B TOOLS EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT B TRAFFIC EQ FIW C EQ OTHER TOTAL
NFTo. DEPARTMENT 55561-A-00 5556Pkp0 55563-8-00 55561-8-00 55566-1-00 55561_F_00 55568.8.00 55569_9-00 BUDGET
_..._...._ ..-__.__.._ ______ ________ ;
2150 Xana9esenl Office 15,000 15,000
"All'seat Support 55,800 155.GAS
Personnel 100.000
15,000 15.000
2210 Director of Finable
61.800 61,800
2220 Accounting
3.000 10,000 13.000
2230 purchasinglWarehouslog
13,500 1851398 286,913
2240 Information Systns
25,000 11,735 ll,l50
10,600 1/,550 66.750
flip General Superintendent 11,600
5,000 160,050
3330 plant Maintenance
43.000 17,700 95,150
8.100 175 41,475
3140 collection Facilities
8,000 S1100
25,/00 I5,000 15,915 3.500 22.025
11,900
3550 Xecmnical Maintenance
25.000 5,618 2,619 60,467
3360 Electrical Mai ntaname 21.200 1.889
4,081
11,600 12,050 4,005 3,890 32,335
$370 Inslrueenl. Maintenance
29 225
33SO Treatmant Plant Oper. 14,850 10.000 5.500 11,000 70,575
12,630 12,670
3510 Director of Technical Ser.
38.010 38,010
3520 Compliance
3,200 18/,/90 3,310 191,000
3580 Laboratories
I5,OSO 16,000 2.700 19,950 85.700
3590 Industrial Waste 32,000
2,7m 2.700
3710 Director of Eagimering
71.000 19,500
3720 Planning and Design 0,500
3790 Construction Management 41,500 46,400 46,450 7,I15 3,B00 16,900 162.535
..... ........... ........... ........... ...........
TOTAL 89-90 REQUESTS 316.200 163,549 119,106 137.050- -- 283,505- --_30,178 569,112 ----_--. 0 1,650,000-
:71P891.13 CA?I'.6: .^.^.lT MOLTING BUBO
C115531ICATTV OF BHDGITIO PIOJICTS By IIVIVDI PIOGRAB CAM1115 SCBIDOLI 3-2
?IiCAL Fiat 1965-ID Page 1
9 D 8 P G
j P.PQUTABI B[P LAC IMy 18PROVBD ADDITIOMAL RIPLACINMT INPIOVID ADDITIONAL
BO"-GEy S 711ATNENT CAPICM i MATNRAT CAPACITT
15E°.-3F pIC0A5Tl ABCOISTI
1. New and Rebudgeted major Projects
A. 1e[lila[100 Plant I
1, ixpilslna In ID MGD, P1-I6-1 100.000 100% I 100,000
1. Neldvorks RO.3 1 Plant 10.1, PIQOyPI-Cl 1'000.000 • 441 601 1,600,000 2,400,400
3. Odor Caatrol Facilities
a. Covers for Primary Mine, Pldy 100.100 100% 100,000
b. foal Air Scrubber System, V-2f :C0.000 IDOi 1 1100.000
'. Iu[uucesfsecuuty;lnterlor load.Bams[apsn4 P!-.1 9CO.ODO 501 SOi 450,000 450.000
5. Primary Clarifiers Its. 6-15, 1I-33 I 13,000A00 1001 12,001,000
6. Digesters 11-16 aid Gas Handling System. P1-34-1 11,000,000 30% BOt '.,i00.000 91600,000
i. Sludge Sandhog Facilities, PI.31: I 10,000.000- 501 50% 5,000,000 $1000,000
E. Aebabilititien cf Digesters 7 A E. PI-35-1 [.iS0.i00 1001 MS01000
3. Aebabll:tatloo of Digesters 5 S 1G. PL-35-: !001 1
:0. Underground yank Replacement at Plan[ 1, !-DE'-1 301000 100% IC1000
11. fuel System laprovemeets, R-033-1 150,000 1001 150.000
IL Central Air Compressor Stauoa 50% SOt
13. Ileetrificitica Project I 100.000 100% 100,000
:6. fr:miry Sreauen[ 3fi NG3 LOD.100 :DOA � I IOO.000
15. Primary Treatment 36 IGi 1101
16. Belt Presses II Hnitsl IO01
17. tar Sewage Emergency Bypass IPOI
Is. DAPS: 3 1 40' Diameter 1".BOB IOU% 100,000
'5. Scuds Storage It Bins 1001
:0. Standby Power Generation 1!0j
:1. Moot[:rsngl C:ntm3 System I 1.330,i0L 100% 1.300,000
13. Digesters: 3 1 110' Diameter IO01
N. Remove Tri[klina Filters lit 100%
34. Illy Ilentriel Power Dislritatioe IOOt
35. to MGD Oxygen Actrgted Sludge 6 DAT's Feel
N. Misc. Projects 1.000.000 60% 10% 307 I - fi00A00 :00,000 - :00.000
SUB-TOTAL - RICUMATION PLAN? 1 tt.310.000 11,110.000 -650,000 11-350,000
Cc A I SU Its CAPITAL OOTLAT AIV06VIMG SAND
CLASS111CAFION Of BOOGITID PAOJIRS BY IIVI101 PROGRAM C17I0II98 SCBIRLI 3-2
IISCAL TIAI 1989-90 ,page 2
A A C A I P G
IIAOIRID 9IPLICIMIT IMP'RIO ADDITIONAL IIPLACIIXT 11110VID ADDITIONAL
IODGIT A TIIATRR CAPACITT a TRIATX®T CAPACITT
1989-90 I AIC0IST8 11CONSTI
A. Treatment Plait 2
1. Additional 105 Foot Digester 1001
2. operations Bulldin9. P2-23.5-1 500.000 loot 500,000
3. Upgrade Activated Sludge Systea. P2-50 100,000 1001 100,0o0
I. Additional BAY 100.000 100% 100,000
S. Odor Control facilities
a. Primary Basins 'A' ttru 'G' Covers. PZ-32 HOMO 1001 450,000
D. foul Air Icrubbers Systel, PS-33 :50.000 100% 250,000
c. liprovantS to Grit facility 1, /1111095 Tunnel
and Distribution StIUCUTl A. P2.31 51,000 1001 50,000
6. Landscape aid Support Facilities
a. Meaning Building, P2.35-2 HAMA IDOL 500,000
b. Xatatenace Building , PI.35-3 100,000 100% 100.000
c. Construction MaDigtaeAt Office, R-35-8 5001000 I look 500.000
d. these II site and Security Iaprovelests, P2-05-5 100,000 100% 1001000
7. disc Modifco a toproveamets to facilities, PI-07 2.300.000 loot 21300,000
I. IeBabilitatiao of Digesters [,J,[,L,M,I a 0, P2-19 3.000.000 100% 31000,000
9, Process Control Computer Monitor lmprovmemeta. P2-ID 150.000 SOt Sst I25,st0 125.000
10. Primary Treatment 21 XGD.PNI 500.000 1001 $00.000
11, oadergrovid Tank Ieplaelebt, I-027-2 10.000 loot 10,000
12. fuel System loproveleots, 1-033.2 150,000 loot 150,000
13. overflow Pup Stating loot
16. Ilectrification Project 200,000 loot 200,060
15, Solids Storage: 2 gifts 1001
16. Potable eater Distribution Rsteo 1001
17. NooitoriaglContul System 30,000 IDl $01 15,000 11,000
Is. Bill of Power Gemeratloa 1001
19. ?list eater Pup Station lost
20. Misc. Projects 1000.000 601 20% 3st 600.000 200 goo 2AOAB0
SOB-TOTAL - MATMIR PUTT 1 19.050.000 7.950,000 9001000 1120.000
:01I99 '..us .:WITAL amid 9HOLYIIO fm
AOSUIu1101 H INGETx emim IS Ixml PIMM CATewuls sclicau 1.2
M1. TW 1919.90 age 1
1 B C 0 3 I G
Pgalxl 1 HIFUCINT :NiNID m1?lam HPu[Im 1"13YID A001510[IL
Ism i Monday CAPAtIlt Y TIm01N CAPACITY
1019.90 I IImOH I Nulm
L. tech ltim Pilot Ltd
:. Sl:e Arydatulo 1.560.I0 Sot SOt ' 2.254,066 2.254,N1
:. ft:lmlltn Platt 3 :00.196 sit SH 50.N1 1 $0,001
SO-TVIAL - 31CWIAT101 PUM 1.640.410 1,110.111 2.166.001
.......... .......... ........ ......
a. lanrplut add Joatl
1. Aide. Edlding league. i lead. :-1.1. 1-7•5 I M11.IN ill lot lot ''-N.m 200.006 i'soo'00
'. lebablCou. test. ub at ?It 1 to O2fin. 3.11.1 55.x0 list 1 1 SL111
1. Oflbll 3oorte[ fund. J-15.1-1:1 1.511.111 ill 1 111 IAN.m so.000
A. Council :abort¢ff. J-❑ I 1.311A10 lift
S. Control guer,taod facility
a. national pup[rebm. J•19A I II.m.IN sit sit 1.100.000 5,900.aw
b. deisuN?,rebels. J-111
o. ollot I htllltf. J-19.1 1.3N.101 sit Sol i :.500.040 1.500.000
d. Pilot : Facility. 1-19-i i.160.000 'At $01 j 1.50 1 06 11540,000
6. larolodersautuuce Ilxl. .Oil late, J•2: 2.5A0.060 sit I ads I 11254,161 1,H1.IN
t. paste Gat Flarn.J-:1. J-211 MASS I 1111 651,10
1. Oetfoll 6 Water Pup Stations -
a. IeNatlou[ of 71- Ntfill Seer. J-.,-i Itldd, I.ON.IN 100% 1.111.60
b. action Ootttll le. 1 Lind issues, 2-::•: j Ilot
C. let Sdge Mee[ H. 1, J>;•i 1Nt
d. Map Cl2 statlao for OOttlil Ic. 1 301
t. Sinai Dlaad:le Under Was 'C' I 7H 301
f. defend il' to Deep glee Tits 120- Ntll12 IN\
5. Operations Building, J-23-1 3 : 1 1.91.111 Set sot 'SOA10 ?51.111
:D. ?alluut Fluently ad Teat facility.J"I"A.:11 MAN toot , 501.000
11. formal IuldJal at Pit I. J-21 I u6,lx lit LOAN
1:. Ilamcil Putt $Intel,means aues
1!. dertbNlle estimates III,AN loll Ix,m
it. Aterality Unlltes, 1•i 1
a. ::a' litirplint an :A10.wo lit 91l j :31.010 I 2.20.00o
E. u[e:pint Ctisry Cltse 310.Ow :Ol in 163.000
c. ladu[nil later late 60.010 ... set RAII i 30,w0
Sw
d. Distant Gal list IN.1/1 SH s1.uo !1:-:::a. Communication fable ILHo litsot s,af 5,000
1!. Sludge Llanelli j
1. :eapdt Ham ann nut it% SH
In. tied Aguilltaa Sit SOt
C. 01[dfill Ddalwlort Plate [ 501 511
d. Cnpod facility sit ;:It
15. [ailed Interplant III name 101 Ht
:J. Ilse pit;'as ' In Goo 6"
Ep lot j 306.10 100.060 100'an
m•Tmu • 1 m0l pwnnsrt u1,u1,IN I n_NJ,lo1 saol.oN stut000
:OIF89 1.'Li
CAPITA', OUTLAY REVOLVING I010
:!ASSIT'-[AT49 Cl EXCITED PROJECTS BY IBV1N01 PROGW CATIG01I1S SCHEDULE 1.2
!ISCAL YEAR 1919-90 Page 4
B C O E G
a001RED 31PUCIM INPROVID ADDITIONAL RIPUCINIT INPIOVts II401110
OUDG97 A ^.IRA'- CAPACITY f TIIRTNOT CAPACITY
190-ID RICORTR lEC015T1
7. Special ?ro7e<ts
A. Nester Plamilll Reports
1. Actla Pile - :oviroolenill A6se3faat Program 200,000
:DOA 200,000
2. Action Pilo • Coamalty 0u[reae lrogne :S.OsI I 100E 25.410
3. Action Pill - 2lcil:ues Plammister ?ian i0.fD0 I :lei %000
4. Action ?lll • LtglslauvellegVlaloty Pm?ran :Sloss loot :5,004
S. Agtun ?Ran - Financial P11B 101000 loot 10,000
5. Action flag - VPDES Permit Appluuoce 20,000 011% 20,000
7, Action Plem - Nanegoeet L CootdiatlGo 10.410 1001 10,400
B. Solids treateeot and Disposal trg7acte SLAW tool $0,000
C. Beep Ccall Disposal LValatuo loot
D. Air Duality Colu:l Program
1. Air Toiics inventory IAB25691 i 501000 140% 50.000
:. 70CIaG BAR Deloostfluou ?rwia 50,000 100% 50,000
E. Chemical Nandleng and Contra Ilgr"flale 10,000 100% 10,000
F. 7ceae Discharge I01p190ce it it,al
1. B:osssy Prs7ect 15.000 leg% V.000
2. ocean Nooitorion Studies 50,000 100% I 50,000
,. Torms Redaction Wlatioc ,TL'1 Prolect 1001
G.,Scarce Cootrol and Vista Naoagelent Program
I. to-Mouse Warning Vat, Nmacestot Progra 15.000 1001 I 15,000
-. TrallJne Monitoring :0,100 :so% i 20,000
.. visit N:meuation 75,000 1005 7C,000
1. Peaaneat NcusehOld Waste Collection Sites 125.000 1001 I2S,000
H. Laboratory Deveinplut Progra 2S.Am0 1001 7S,as
508.10AL - SPICIAL PROJECTS f6f,000 ::S.000 ]10.400
: --...-•--- ---------- ---------- ..........
EquipleaE items 1,6so.tlCa iDi 50t 711 165.000 990,000 495.000
TOTAL JOINT VO IS CAPITAL AIgOiERRRS 102.�2s,D00 71.6Sa,coo 015.000 56,652.000
WASTEWATER
DISCHARGE REGULATIONS
JULY 129 1989
w
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
r
SECTION PAGE
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
r
ARTICLE 1
r
GENERAL PROVISIONS
101. PURPOSE AND POLICY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
r
102. DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
r
103 . CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
104. PERMIT TRANSFER PROHIBITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
r 105. PERMIT - CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
106. AUTHORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
W 107. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
108. SIGNATORY REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
W
W ARTICLE 2
GENERAL PROHIBITIONS AND LIMITATIONS ON DISCHARGES
W
201. PROHIBITED DISCHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
W 202. PROHIBITION ON DILUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
203. LIMITATIONS ON SURFACE RUNOFF AND GROUNDWATER. . . . 21
204. LIMITATIONS ON UNPOLLUTED WATER . . . . . . . . . . .21
205. LIMITATIONS ON RADIOACTIVE WASTES . . . . . . . . . .22
W
206. LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF GRINDERS. . . . . . . . . .22
207. LIMITATIONS ON POINT OF DISCHARGE. . . . . . . . . . 22
r
208. LIMITATIONS ON WASTEHAULER DISCHARGES. . . . . . . . 23
r
W
u
L
SECTION PAGE
209. LIMITATIONS ON WASTEWATER STRENGTH AND
CHARACTERISTICS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
210. MASS EMISSION RATE DETERMINATION . . . . . . . . . . 24
211. PROHIBITION ON INFECTIOUS WASTE. 26
212. LIMITATIONS ON DISPOSAL OF SPENT INDUSTRIAL
SOLUTIONS AND SLUDGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26
ARTICLE 3
DISCHARGE PERMITS, CHARGES, AND FEES iy
301. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
V
302. CLASS I WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS . . . . . . . . 27
302.1 CLASS I WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION. . . 28 'L
302.2 CLASS I PERMIT CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS . . . . . .29
302.3 CLASS I PERMIT FEE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 �+
302.4 TERMS AND CONDITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30
302.5 PERMIT DURATION AND RENEWAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
302.6 CLASS I CHARGE FOR USE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31
303. CLASS II WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS . . . . . . . .34
i
303.1 CLASS II WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION. . .35
303.2 CLASS II PERMIT CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS . . . . . 36
303.3 CLASS II PERMIT FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37
303.4 TERMS AND CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 j
V
303.5 PERMIT DURATION AND RENEWAL . . . . . . . . . . . . .38
303.6 CLASS II CHARGE FOR USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38
u
304. CLASS III WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS . . . . . . . 41
304.1 CLASS III WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION . .42 Ir
i
L
SECTION PAGE
304.2 CLASS III PERMIT CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS. . . . . 43
m
304.3 CLASS III PERMIT FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
304.4 TERMS AND CONDITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43
304.5 PERMIT DURATION AND RENEWAL . . . . . . . . . . . . .44
m 304.6 CLASS III CHARGE FOR USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
305. SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITS. . . . . . . . . . 46
305.1 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION. . . . .46
305.2 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMIT CONDITIONS AND
LIMITATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47
305.3 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMIT FEE. . . . . . . . .47
r 305.4 TERMS AND CONDITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47
305.5 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMIT DURATION AND
RENEWAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
305.6 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMIT CHARGE FOR USE. . . 48
.. 306. WASTEHAULER DISCHARGE PERMIT. . . . . . . . . . . . .48
306.1 WASTEHAULER DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION. . . . . . .49
306.2 WASTEHAULER DISCHARGE PERMIT CONDITIONS AND
LIMITATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
306.3 WASTEHAULER DISCHARGE PERMIT FEE. .50
306.4 TRANSFERABILITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
306.5 TERMS AND CONDITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50
306.6 PERMIT DURATION AND RENEWAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
306.7 WASTEHAULER DISCHARGE PERMIT CHARGE FOR USE. . . . . 51
307. TRANSPORTABLE TREATMENT UNIT (TTU) DISCHARGE
PERMIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
r 307.1 TRANSPORTABLE TREATMENT UNIT DISCHARGE PERMIT
APPLICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51
.e
307.2 TTU PERMIT CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS . . . . . . . .52
307.3 TTU DISCHARGE PERMIT FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
m
W
SECTIO PAGE
307.4 TERMS AND CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
W
307.5 PERMIT DURATION AND RENEWAL . . . . . . . . . . . . .54
308. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY EXEMPTION FROM CHARGES. . . .54 y
309. EXCESS CAPACITY CHARGE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54
310. OUT OF DISTRICT PERMITS/DISCHARGERS. . . . . . . . . 54 r
ie
ARTICLE 4
FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS
W
401. PRETREATMENT FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56
:r
402. SPILL CONTAINMENT FACILITIES. . . . . . . . . . . . .56
403. MONITORING/METERING FACILITIES. . . . . . . . . . . .56 ti
404. DRAWING SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . .57
405. WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . 58 V
r
ARTICLE 5
MONITORING, REPORTING, NOTIFICATION, AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS
r
501. MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS. . . . . . . . . 59
W
501.1 INSPECTION AND SAMPLING CONDITIONS. . . . . . . . . .60
501.2 RIGHT OF ENTRY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60
W
501.3 NOTIFICATION OF SPILL OR SLUG LOADING . . . . . . . .61
i
501.4 NOTIFICATION OF BYPASS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 r.
W
r
W
60
SECTION PAGE
r ARTICLE 6
ENFORCEMENT
r
600. PURPOSE AND SCOPE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
r 601. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS AND
APPLICABLE FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64
r 602. PROBATION ORDER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67
603. ENFORCEMENT COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE AGREEMENT (ECSA) 68
r 604. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE AGREEMENT (RCSA) . . .70
605. PERMIT SUSPENSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70
606. PERMIT REVOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72
607. WASTERAULER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS. 75
r
608. DAMAGE TO FACILITIES OR INTERRUPTION OF NORMAL
OPERATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76
r
609. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PASS THROUGH .76
610. BATCH DUMPS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
611. PUBLISHED NOTICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .77
612. PUBLIC NUISANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .77
613. TERMINATION OF SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
r' 614. EMERGENCY SUSPENSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
615. INJUNCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
r
616. CIVIL PENALTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .78
r 617. CRIMINAL PENALTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
618. APPEALS TO GENERAL MANAGER . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
r 619. APPEALS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS . . . . . . . . . .80
619.1 APPEAL OF CHARGES AND FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
r
620. PAYMENT OF CHARGES 82
r
r
SECTION PAGE u
621. COLLECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
622. RECOVERY OF COSTS INCURRED BY DISTRICT. . . . . . . .83
623. FINANCIAL SECURITY/AMENDMENTS TO PERMIT . . . . . . .83
u
624. JUDICIAL REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .85
I
ARTICLE 7 V
CONNECTION PERMITS/CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
V
701. INTRODUCTION - ALL DISTRICTS . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
702. DISTRICT NO. 1 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION u
CHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .88
702. DISTRICT NO. 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION V
CHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90
702. DISTRICT NO. 3 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION
CHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92
702. DISTRICT NO. 5 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION
CHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94 u
702. DISTRICT NO. 6 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION
CHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96 u�
702. DISTRICT NO. 7 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION
CHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98
702. DISTRICT NO. 11 CAPITAL. FACILITIES CONNECTION
CHARGES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 I
V
702. DISTRICT NO. 13 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION
CHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .103
703. ANNUAL SUPPLEMENTAL SANITARY SEWER USE CHARGE . . . .104 u
704. EXCEPTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 1
V
705. EXEMPTIONS AND APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105 -
706. CREDIT FOR INDUSTRIAL PERMITTEES . . . . . . . . . . 105
V
I
V
w
r SECTION PAGE
r ARTICLE 8
SEVERABILITY
r
801. SEVERABILITY .106
r ARTICLE 9
r (RESERVED)
901. (RESERVED) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107
ARTICLE 10
r
EFFECTIVE DATE
1001. EFFECTIVE DATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .108
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
m
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
m
m
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County were formed
during 1946-47, but did not commence operation until 1954 with
the acquisition of treatment facilities in Fountain Valley and
completion of the treatment plant and ocean outfall in Huntington
Beach. Recognizing the need to control the quantity and quality
of wastewaters discharged to the sewer system, the Districts'
m Hoards of Directors adopted their first ordinance regulating the
use of the sewerage systems in February 1954. This Ordinance was
later amended in February 1958 and again in April 1970. The 1970
revision formally established the Districts' Industrial Waste
Division for the purpose of issuing permits, setting flow and
quality limits, monitoring discharges to the system, and
conducting enforcement activities.
m The administrative procedures and use charges were modified with
each revision, but the basic quality requirements remained
essentially unchanged until July 1, 1976, when the Ordinance was
m changed to include heavy metal limits. On July 1, 1983, the
Ordinance was again amended to include enforcement of the
Environmental Protection Agency's categorical limits and to
m modify some of the non-compatible pollutant limitations such as
heavy metals.
This Ordinance reflects the changes and the need to clarify and
streamline procedures. The primary goals of this Ordinance are:
o To ensure District compliance with various Regulatory
m Agencies and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) requirements.
,r o To prevent pass through of pollutants and interference
with District operations from heavy metals, non-compatible
wastes and conventional pollutants discharged to the sewer
system.
o To enforce Federal Categorical .Pretreatment Standards.
,r o To prevent municipal sludge contamination.
o To encourage the recycle, reuse, and conservation of
non-renewable resources.
m
1
r
m
o To require waste minimization and material substitution by u
industrial users.
o To minimize the discharge of volatile organic compounds
that separately or collectively contribute to air
emissions from the Districts' sewerage facilities.
o To prevent exposure of District employees to chemical u
hazards created by industrial discharges.
o To require the reduction of water discharged to the sewer
r
system.
o To establish an effective monitoring program for the
control of industrial wastewaters, with enforcement to u
ensure equal treatment to all dischargers.
o To equitably allocate treatment costs. L
This document incorporates necessary modifications to implement
and enforce current Federal, State and District standards and
goals. N
It will continue to be the District's objective to issue permits
to all Industrial/Commercial Users who discharge, or have the L,
potential to discharge, non-compatible pollutants to the sewerage
system and/or whose charge for use exceeds that amount allocated
to the District through the ad valorem tax bill.
u
it
r
V
Yy
w
r
2
Yd
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS
FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES
m
ARTICLE 1
GENERAL PROVISIONS
s
101. PURPOSE AND POLICY
A. The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide for the
maximum public benefit from the use of District's
facilities. This shall be accomplished by
regulating sewer use and wastewater discharges, by
providing equitable distribution of costs in
compliance with applicable State and Federal
Regulations, and by providing procedures that will
o, allow the District to comply with requirements
placed upon the District by other regulatory
agencies. The revenues to be derived from the
application of this Ordinance shall be used to
defray all costs of providing sewerage service by
the District, including, but not limited to,
administration, operation, monitoring, maintenance,
financing, capital construction, replacement and
recovery, and provisions for necessary reserves.
B. This Ordinance shall be interpreted in accordance
r' with the definitions set forth in Section 102. The
provisions of the Ordinance shall apply to the
direct or indirect discharge of all liquid wastes
carried to facilities of the District.
C. To comply with Federal and State of California
policies and to permit the District to meet
applicable standards of treatment plant effluent
quality, provisions are made in this Ordinance for
the regulation of wastewater discharges to the
public sewer. This Ordinance establishes quantity
and quality limitations on all wastewater discharges
which may adversely affect the District's sewerage _
systems, processes, effluent quality, sludge
quality, or inhibit the District's ability to
beneficially reuse or dispose of its sludge or meet
discharge criteria. It is the intent of these
r limitations to improve the quality of wastewater
being received for treatment and to encourage water
conservation and waste minimization by all users
connected to a public sewer. It is the District's
3
e.
I
W
intent to limit future increases in the quantity I
(mass emission) of waste constituents being
discharged. This Ordinance also provides for
regulation of the degree of waste pretreatment
required, the issuance of permits for wastewater
discharge and connections and other miscellaneous
permits, and establishes penalties for violation of
the Ordinance. v
D. since the District is committed to a policy of
wastewater reclamation and reuse in order to provide
an alternate source of water supply, the adoption of
programs for reclamation through secondary and
tertiary wastewater treatment processes may
necessitate more stringent quality requirements on �+
wastewater discharges. In the event that more
stringent quality requirements are necessary, the
Ordinance will be amended to reflect those changes.
V
E. Since the District is also committed to a policy of
the beneficial use of sludge, the adoption of
programs to land-apply or provide for the marketing
and distribution of sludge may necessitate more
stringent quality requirements on wastewater
discharges. In the event that more stringent W
quality requirements are necessary, the Ordinance
will be amended to reflect those changes.
i
u
102. DEFINITIONS
A. Unless otherwise defined herein, terms related to W
water quality shall be as adopted in the latest
edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of
Water and Wastewater, published by the American
Public Health Association, the American Water Works
Association and the Water Pollution Control
Federation.
u
The testing procedures for waste constituents and
characteristics shall be as provided in 40 CER 136
(Code of Federal Regulations; Title 40; Protection
of Environment; Chapter I, Environmental Protection
Agency; Part 136, Test Procedures for the Analyses
of Pollutants) , or as specified. 1
r
Other terms not herein defined are defined as being
the same as set forth in the International
Conference of Building Officials Uniform Building
Code. Current Edition.
V
4
L
1. Ad Valorem Tax shall mean that portion of the
basic tax allocated for the benefit of an
individual District on the assessed value of
land and improvements within its boundaries,
exclusive of bonded indebtedness.
2. Assessed Value shall mean that portion of the
total assessed value of the land and
improvements upon which taxes are collected and
allocated.
3. Batch Dumps shall mean the discharge of
concentrated pollutants of a quality or quantity
r and in a manner or method that is not approved
by the District.
4. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) shall mean the
w measure of biodegradable organic material in
domestic or other wastewaters as represented by
the oxygen utilized over a period of five days
at 20 degrees centigrade and as determined by
the appropriate testing procedures, and
expressed in terms of milligrams per liter.
5. Board shall mean the Board of Directors of the
County Sanitation District No. of orange
County, California. References to the "Joint
Boards of Directors" shall mean the combined
governing Boards of all Districts that are
signatory to the Joint Ownership, Operation and
Construction Agreement of July 1, 1985.
r
6. BVDaSS shall mean the intentional diversion of
wastestreams from any portion of an Industrial
User's treatment facility.
7. Capital Facilities Connection Charge shall mean
the one-time payment of a fee, imposed by the
governing Board of the District, to pay for the
future costs of constructing new sewerage
collection, treatment, and disposal facilities;
the replacement, rehabilitation, or
reconstruction of existing facilities; and as a
contributive share of the cost of the existing
facilities. Said charge shall be paid by all
' property owners at the time they develop the
property and connect directly or indirectly to
the District sewerage facilities as a new system
d user. This charge, as set forth in Article 7 of
this Ordinance, is expressly authorized by the
provisions of California Health & Safety Code
Section 5471.
5
r
8. Capital Facilities Replacement Service Charge V
shall mean a charge imposed on a user of the
treatment works, pursuant to Sections 302.6(F) 2,
303.6(F) 2 or 304.6(B)2 of this Ordinance, which
may be used to recover the costs of operation
and maintenance, which charges shall be
allocated to the District's Operating Fund.
9. Charge For Use shall mean a charge established
and levied by the District upon residential,
commercial and industrial users in proportion to
the use of the treatment works by their
respective class, that provides for the
operation and maintenance expenses, capital
facilities rehabilitation or replacement, and Ir
adequate reserves for the sewage treatment
works.
t
10. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) shall mean the
measure of chemically oxidizable material in
domestic or other wastewaters as determined by
appropriate testing procedures and expressed 6J
in terms of milligrams per liter.
11. Class I User shall mean any user who:
a) Discharges wastewater which may contain, at
any given time, any of the components as I
specified in Section 205, Limitations on
Radioactive Wastes, Section 209, Limitations
on Wastewater Strength and characteristics,
or Section 210, Mass Emission Rate V
Determination, Table I Discharge Limits
or Mass Emission Rate Determination;
b) Is subject to Federal Categorical
Pretreatment Standards as defined by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ;
u
c) Discharges wastewater which may cause, as
determined by the General Manager, pass
through or interference with the District
system.
12. Class II User shall mean any industrial user I
whose charge for use is greater than the ad r
valorem tax basic levy allocated to the
District, exclusive of debt service, that
discharges wastes other than sanitary, and that y
is not otherwise required to obtain a Class I
permit.
y
6
I
13. Class III User shall mean any user that
discharges only sanitary waste and whose charge
for use is greater than the ad valorem tax basic
levy allocated to the District, exclusive of
debt service, and is not otherwise required to
obtain a Class I or Class II permit. Unless
w otherwise stipulated in the permit, Class III
users shall be considered discharging a
domestic waste equivalent for B.O.D. and
suspended solids.
w
14. Code of Federal Reculations (CFR) shall mean the
codification of the general and permanent rules
published in the Federal Register by the
Executive departments and agencies of the
Federal Government.
w 15. compatible Pollutant shall mean a combination of
biochemical oxygen demand, suspended solids, pH,
fecal coliform bacteria, plus other pollutants
that the District's treatment facilities are
designed to accept and/or remove. Compatible
- pollutants are non-compatible when discharged in
quantities that have an adverse effect on the
w District's system or NPDES permit.
16. Composite Sample shall mean a collection of
individual samples obtained at intervals during
a specified period of time. The resulting
mixture (composite sample) forms a
representative sample of the wastestream
w discharged during the sample period. Samples
will be collected during the time manufacturing,
processing, and/or sewer discharge occurs.
17. Connection Permit shall mean a permit issued by
the governing District, upon payment of a
capital facilities connection charge,
authorizing the permittee to connect directly to
a District sewerage facility or to a sewer which
ultimately discharges into a District sewerage
w facility.
18. CSDOC shall mean County Sanitation Districts of
w
Orange County.
19. Cyanide. (Amenable) shall mean those cyanides
amenable to chlorination as described in 40 CFR
m 136.3.
20. Department Head shall mean that person duly
w
designated by the General Manager to direct the
7
r
w
V
Source Control Division and perform those
delegated duties as specified in this Ordinance.
21. Development shall mean parcel of land on which
dwelling units, commercial or industrial
buildings or other improvements are built.
22. Discharger shall mean any person who discharges .w
or causes a discharge of wastewater directly or
indirectly to a public sewer. Discharger shall
mean the same as User.
23. District shall mean any individual or
combination of individual County Sanitation i
Districts No. 11 21 3, 51 61 71 11, 13, or 14 of
Orange County and shall include any Districts
that are formed after the effective date of this
Ordinance that are included in the Joint '�
Administrative Organization.
24. District Sewerage Facility shall mean any
property belonging to the District used in the 6d
treatment, reclamation, reuse, transportation,
or disposal of wastewater.
25. Division Head shall mean that person duly
designated by the General Manager to implement
the District's Industrial Waste Pretreatment
Program and perform the duties as specified in
this Ordinance.
26. Domestic Wastewater shall mean the liquid and W
solid waterborne wastes derived from the
ordinary living processes of humans of such
character as to permit satisfactory disposal,
without special treatment, into the public sewer
or by means of a private disposal system.
27. Dwelling Unit shall mean a single unit providing
complete, independent living facilities for one
or more persons, which may include permanent
provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking v
and sanitation.
For the purpose of this Ordinance, a mobile home
shall be considered as a Dwelling Unit. More it
than one Dwelling Unit per structure and/or lot
shall be deemed multiple Dwelling Units.
28. Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA)
shall mean a mutual agreement between the
District and permittee amending the permit to
V
8
y
y
require implementation of necessary pretreatment
practices and/or installation of equipment to
ensure permit compliance.
29. Executive Committee shall mean the Executive
Committee of the combined governing Boards
(Joint Boards of Directors) of all Districts
` that are signatory to the Joint ownership,
Operation and Construction Agreement of July 1,
1985.
r
30. Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards shall
- mean those standards promulgated by EPA in
accordance with 40 CFR 401-471, Section 307(b)
and (c) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1317)
and which applies to a specific category of
industrial user.
w
31. Floor Area shall mean the area included within
the surrounding exterior walls of a building or
.. portion thereof, exclusive of ramps, docks, vent
shafts, and courts. The floor area of a
building, or portion thereof, not provided with
surrounding exterior walls shall be the usable
r area under the horizontal projection of the roof
or floor above.
a 32. Flow Monitoring Facilities shall mean equipment
and structures approved by the District provided
at the user's expense to measure, totalize,
and/or record, the incoming water to the
facility or the wastewater discharged to the
sewer.
33. General Manager shall mean the individual duly
designated by the Board of Directors of the
District to administer this Ordinance (REFER TO
r
SECTION 107) .
34. Grab Sample shall mean an individual sample
collected over a period of time not exceeding
w fifteen (15) minutes.
35. Industrial Use shall mean any user that
discharges water-carried wastes and wastewaters
to the District's sewerage facilities, as
defined by EPA regulations set forth in 40 CFR
403.3 (h) and as identified in the Standard
d+ Industrial Classification Manual, 1987, Office
of Management and Budget, as amended and
supplemented.
.d
9
V
d
b1
36. Industrial Wastewater shall mean all it
water-carried wastes and wastewater of the
community, excluding domestic wastewater, and
shall include all wastewater from any producing,
manufacturing, processing, agricultural, or
other operation. These may also include wastes
of human origin similar to domestic wastewaters.
37. Infectious Waste shall mean materials which are
likely to transmit etiologic agents- which cause,
or significantly contribute to the cause of,
increased morbidity or mortality of human
beings, as more specifically set forth in Health
and Safety Code Section 25117.5.
Ir
38. Inspector shall mean a person authorized by the
General Manager to inspect any development
discharging or anticipating discharge to '4
wastewater conveyance, processing and disposal
facilities.
39. Interference shall mean any discharge which, N
alone or in conjunction with discharges from
other sources, inhibits or disrupts the
District's treatment processes or operations, or
its sludge processes, use, or disposal; or is a
cause of violation of the District's NPDES
permit or prevents lawful sludge use or
disposal.
40. LEL (Lower Explosive Limit) shall mean the
minimum concentration of a combustible gas or
vapor in air (usually expressed in percent by
volume at sea level) which will ignite if an
ignition source (sufficient ignition energy) is b
present.
41. Local Sewerinc Agency shall mean any public
agency or private corporation responsible for
the collection and disposal of wastewater to the
District's sewerage facilities duly authorized
under the laws of the State of California to L
construct and/or maintain public sewers.
42. Maior Violation shall mean a discharge over the 1
maximum permitted discharge limit by an amount ►r
equal to or greater than one pound per day of
the constituents set forth in Table I or having
a pH discharge of less than 5.0. `,
43. Mass Emission Rate shall mean the weight of
material discharged to the sewer system during a
L+
10
i
L
r
given time interval. Unless otherwise
specified, the mass emission rate shall mean
pounds per day of a particular constituent or
combination of constituents.
44. May shall mean permissive.
45. Milligrams Per Liter (LWL) shall mean a unit of
the concentration of water or wastewater
constituent. It is 1 gram of the constituent in
w 1,000 liters of water. It has replaced the unit
formerly used, parts per million, to which it is
approximately equivalent in reporting the
results of water and wastewater analysis.
46. Minor Violation shall mean a discharge over the
maximum permitted discharge limit by an amount
less than one pound per day of the constituents
set forth in Table I or having a pH discharge of
between 5.0 - 5.9.
47. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) shall mean the permit issued to control
the discharge to surface waters of the United
States as detailed in Public Law 92-500, Section
402.
e, 48. New Construction shall mean any structure
planned or under construction for which a
connection permit has not been issued.
49. New Source shall mean those sources that are new
as defined by 40 CFR 403. 3 (k) as revised October
17, 1988.
50. Non-Compatible Pollutant shall mean any
pollutant which is not a compatible pollutant as
defined herein.
51. Normal Working Day shall mean the period of time
during which production and/or operation is
d+ taking place and/or any period of discharge to
the sewer.
e 52. Operation and Maintenance Service Charge shall
mean a charge imposed on a user of the treatment
works, pursuant to Sections 302.6(F) 1, 303.6(F) 1
or 304.6(B) 1 of this Ordinance, which may be
used to recover the costs of operation and
maintenance, which charges shall be allocated to
the District's Operating Fund.
- 11
.s
r
53. Ordinance shall mean that document entitled ,.
"Wastewater Discharge Regulations" containing
District requirements, conditions, and
limitations for connecting and discharging to V
the sewer system, as may be amended and
modified.
54. pH shall mean both acidity and alkalinity on a y
scale ranging from 0 to 14 where 7 represents
neutrality, numbers less than 7 increasing
acidity, and more than 7 increasing alkalinity,
and is the logarithm of the reciprocal of the
quantity of hydrogen ions in moles per liter of
solution.
1.+
55. Pass Through shall mean discharge through the
Districts' facilities to navigable water which,
alone or in conjunction with discharges from W
other sources, is a cause of a violation of the
District's NPDES permit.
56. Permittee shall mean a person who has received a
permit to discharge wastewater pollutants into
the District's sewerage system subject to the
requirements and conditions established by
the District.
57. Person shall mean any individual, partnership,
firm, association, corporation or public agency,
including the State of California and the United
States of America.
58. Pesticides shall mean those compounds including,
but not limited to DDT (dichlorodiphenyl-
trichloroethane, both isomers) , DDE (dichloro- '
diphenylethylene) , DDD (dichlorodiphenyl-
dichloroethane) , Aldrin, Benzene Hexachloride
(alpha, beta and gamma isomers) , Chlordane,
Endrin, Endrin aldehyde, 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) , toxaphene,
Alpha-endosulfan, Beta-endosulfan, Endosulfan
sulfate, Heptachlor, Heptachlor epoxide, and
Dieldrin.
59. Pollutant shall mean any constituent or
characteristic of wastewaters on which a )r
discharge limitation may be imposed either by
the District or the regulatory bodies empowered
to regulate the District. r,
60. Polychlorinated Biohenvls (PCB) shall mean those
compounds including, but not limited to
12
L'
Aroclors, 1016, 1221, 1228, 1232, 1248, 1254,
1260, and 1262.
d' 61. Pretreatment shall mean the reduction of the
_ amount of pollutants, the elimination of
pollutants, or the alteration of the nature of
pollutant properties in wastewater to a level
authorized by the District prior to discharge of
the wastewater into the District's system. The
reduction or alteration can be obtained by
physical, chemical or biological process, or
process changes by other means.
s, 62. Pretreatment Facility shall mean any works or
devices for the treatment or flow limitation of
wastewater prior to discharge into a public
sewer.
63. Priority Pollutants shall mean the toxic
pollutants identified and listed by EPA as
,m having the greatest environmental impact. They
are classified as non-compatible pollutants and
may require pretreatment prior to discharge in
order to prevent interference with District's
operation, sludge contamination, or treatment
system pass through into receiving waters or
into the atmosphere.
m
64. Public Agency shall mean the State of California
and any city, county, district, other local
authority or public body of or within this
State.
65. Public Sewer shall mean a sewer owned and
m operated by the District, a city or other local
sewering agency which is tributary to treatment
facilities operated by the District.
All public sewers must be constructed in
accordance with District's regulations and
specifications for construction of sanitary
sewers.
66. RCRA shall mean Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6901, et seq. )
and as amended.
67. Regulatory Agencies shall mean those agencies
having jurisdiction over the operation of the
District including, but not limited to, the
following:
13
m
u
a) United states Environmental Protectionv
Agency, Region IX, San Francisco and
Washington, DC (EPA) ;
b) California state Water Resources Control w
Board (SWRCB) ;
c) California Regional water Quality Control
Board, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB) ;
d) South Coast Air Quality Management District L
(SCAQMD) ; and
e) California Department of Health Services
(DOHS) . Ir
68. Regulatory Compliance Schedule Aareement (RCSA)
shall mean an agreement between the District and
permittee requiring the permittee to implement
pretreatment practices and/or install equipment
to ensure compliance with future revised
categorical pretreatment standards or revised W
discharge limitations.
69. Representative Sample Point shall mean a
location approved by the District, from which
wastewater can be collected that is as nearly
identical in content and consistency as possible
to that of the entire flow of wastewater being
sampled.
70. Routine sampling shall mean sampling conducted L
prior to any enforcement action(s) initiated by
the District. Sampling shall consist of either
grab or composite sampling which may be
conducted at the District's discretion. V
71. Sampling Facilities shall mean structure(s)
approved by the District provided at the user's
expense for the District or user to measure and
record wastewater constituent levels, collect a
representative sample, and/or provide access to
plug/terminate the discharge.
72. Sanitary Waste shall mean domestic wastewater.
73. Sewage shall mean wastewater.
74. Sewerage Facilities shall mean any and all I
iw
facilities used for collecting, conveying,
pumping, treating, and disposing of wastewater
and sludge.
L.
14
iy
V
75. shall means mandatory.
,. 76. Significant Non-Compliance shall mean a
compliance status a) in which a major violation
remains uncorrected 45 days after notification
of non-compliance; or b) which is a result of
chronic violations (66% or more of all samples
which exceed the daily maximum limit of the same
constituent during a 12-month period) , or acute
r, violations (33% or more of all samples which are
a major violation of the daily maximum limit of
- - the same constituent) ; or c) which is a result
of failure to provide reports in response to
Notice of Violation, permit application
information, Report of Progress, a Report of
Non-Compliance, or other reports required to
administer the ordinance, within 30 days from
the due date; or d) which resulted in the
District issuing a Cease and Desist Order or
exercising its emergency authority.
77. Slug Load shall mean a discharge that exceeds
the prohibitions stated in Section 209 and
d significantly exceeds the usual user flow and/or
pollutant loading.
78. Sludge shall mean any solid, semi-solid or
liquid decant, subnate or supernate from a
manufacturing process, utility service, or
pretreatment facility.
79. Special Purpose User shall mean any discharger
who is granted a Special Purpose Discharge
,r Permit by the District to discharge unpolluted
water, storm runoff or groundwater to the
District's sewerage facilities.
80. Spent Solutions shall mean any substance defined
as a hazardous waste by RCRA, 40 CFR 261.21
through 261.24, and unable to be used for its
,. original purpose.
81. Spill Containment shall mean a District-approved
protection system installed by the permittee to
prohibit the discharge to the sewer of
non-compatible pollutants.
. 82. Standard Industrial Classification f5 I C t
shall mean a system of classifying industries as
identified in the S.I.C. Manual, 1987, or
r
15
w
r
y
subsequent edition, as prepared by the Office of ly
Management and Budget.
83. Standard Methods shall mean procedures described v
in the current edition of Standard Methods for
the Examination of Water and Wastewater, as
published by the American Public Health
Association, the American water Works L+
Association and Water Pollution Control
Federation.
84. Suspended Solids shall mean any insoluble
material contained as a component of wastewater
and capable of separation from the liquid
portion of said waste by laboratory filtration
as determined by the appropriate testing
procedure and expressed in terms of milligrams
per liter. V
85. Tax Credit shall mean that portion of the basic
levy on the discharger-s County of Orange Ad
Valorem Tax Bill allocated to the District. The
basic levy does not include taxes for bonded
indebtedness.
86. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) shall mean the
measure of total organic carbon in domestic or
other wastewater as determined by the
appropriate testing procedure. i.0
87. Unpolluted Water shall mean water to which no
constituent has been added either intentionally
or accidentally.
88. User shall mean any person who discharges or
causes a discharge of wastewater directly or 6W
indirectly to a public sewer. User shall mean
the same as Discharger or Industrial User.
N
$9. waste shall mean sewage and any and all other
waste substances, liquid, solid, gaseous or
radioactive, associated with human habitation or
of human or animal nature, including such wastes
placed within containers of whatever nature
prior to and for the purpose of disposal.
w
90. Waste Manifest shall mean that receipt which is
retained by the generator of hazardous wastes as
required by the State of California and/or the
United States Government pursuant to RCRA, or
the California Hazardous Materials Act, or that
receipt which is retained by the generator for '
1r
16
y
recyclable wastes or liquid non-hazardous wastes
as required by the District.
91. Wastehauler shall mean any person carrying on or
engaging in vehicular transport of waste as part
- of, or incidental to, any business for the
purpose of discharging said waste into the
District's system.
92. Wastewater shall mean waste and water, whether
treated or untreated, discharged into or
permitted to enter a public sewer.
93. Wastewater Constituents and Characteristics
shall mean the individual chemical, physical,
bacteriological, and radiological parameters,
including volume and flow rate and such other
.. parameters that serve to define, classify or
measure the quality and quantity of wastewater.
B. Words used in this Ordinance in the singular may
include the plural and the plural the singular. Use
of masculine shall mean feminine and use of feminine
shall mean masculine.
103. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
All user information and data on file with the District
shall be available to the public and governmental agencies
without restriction unless the user specifically requests
+ and is able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
District that the release of such information would
divulge information, processes or methods which would be
detrimental to the user's competitive position. The
demonstration of the need for confidentiality made by the
permittee must meet the burden necessary for withholding
such information from the general public under applicable
State and Federal Law. Any such claim must be made at the
time of submittal of the information by marking the
submittal "Confidential Business Information" on each page
containing such information. Information which is
demonstrated to be confidential shall not be transmitted
to anyone other than a governmental agency without prior
notification to the user. Information concerning
wastewater quality and quantity will not be deemed
confidential.
.d
-- 17
v
104. PERMIT TRANSFER PROHIBITIONS
Permits issued under this Ordinance are for a specific
user, for a specific operation at a specific location or a F"
specific wastehauler, and create no vested rights.
Discharge permits or their mass emission rates shall not
be transferred for an operation at a different location. Ld
105. PERMIT - CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP
�w
Upon the sale or transfer of ownership of any business
operating under a permit issued by the District, the
permittee shall notify the District in writing prior to it
the transfer. The successor owner shall be required to
apply for a new permit within 15 days of the sale or
transfer of ownership in accordance with the provisions of
this Ordinance.
106. AUTHORITY
The District is regulated by several agencies of the
United States Government and the State of California,
pursuant to the provisions of Federal and State Law.
Federal and State Laws grant to the District the authority
to regulate and/or prohibit, by the adoption of ordinances
or resolutions, and by issuance of discharge permits, the �+
discharge of any waste, directly or indirectly, to the
District's sewerage facilities. Said authority includes
the right to establish limits, conditions, and 'W
prohibitions; to establish flow rates or prohibit flows
discharged to the District's sewerage facilities; to
require the development of compliance schedules for the
installation of equipment systems and materials by all
users; and to take all actions necessary to enforce its
authority, whether within or outside the District's
boundaries, including those users that are tributary to
the District or within areas for which the District has
contracted to provide sewerage services.
The District has the authority pursuant to California
Health and Safety Codes 5471 and 5474 to prescribe,
revise, and collect all fees and charge for services and 1
facilities furnished by the District either within or r
without its territorial limits.
w
la
L.
u
P
107. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
P Whenever any power is granted to or a duty is imposed upon
the General Manager, the power may be exercised or the
duty may be performed by a person authorized by the
General Manager.
108. SIGNATORY REQUIREMENTS
m
Reports and permit applications required by the Ordinance
for Federal Regulations shall contain the following
certification statement:
- "I have personally examined and am familiar with the
information submitted in the attached document, and I
d hereby certify under penalty of law that this information
_ was obtained in accordance with the Federal Pretreatment
Requirements. Moreover, based upon my inquiry of those
m individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the
information reported herein, I believe that the submitted
information is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware
that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fine and
imprisonment."
The statement shall be signed by an authorized
representative of the industrial user as defined in 40 CFR
403.12 (1) (1-4) .
w
19
r
ARTICLE 2
GENERAL PROHIBITIONS AND LIMITATIONS ON DISCHARGES
r
201. PROHIBITED DISCHARGES
A. No person shall discharge a quantity or quality of
wastewater directly or indirectly to sewerage
facilities owned by or tributary to the District's
sewerage system which causes, or is capable of
causing, either alone or by interaction with other
substances:
1. A fire or explosion;
2. Obstruction to the flow in the sewer system
resulting in interference or damage to the
r, sewerage facilities;
3. Danger to life or safety of any person;
4. Impairment of the effective maintenance or
operation of the sewerage system;
5. The release of toxic or malodorous gas-producing
substances;
6. Interference with the wastewater treatment
process;
7. The District's effluent or any other product of
W the treatment process, residues, sludges or scums,
to be unsuitable for reclamation, reuse or
disposal;
8. Discoloration, pass through, or any other
condition which affects the quality of the
District's treatment works effluent in such a
manner that receiving water quality requirements
established by Regulatory Agencies cannot be met;
9. Conditions which violate any statute or any rule,
regulation, or ordinance of any public agency or
Regulatory Agency having jurisdiction over the
discharge of wastewater through the sanitary
sewer system.
B. No person shall discharge wastewater delivered by
vehicular transport, rail car, or dedicated pipeline
20
r
Wo
directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage a,+
facilities any substance that is defined as a
hazardous waste by the Regulatory Agencies.
C. No person shall transport waste from one location or
facility to another for the purpose of treating or
discharging it directly or indirectly to a publicly
owned sewer without written permission from the u
District.
D. No user shall increase the contribution of flow,
pollutants, or change the nature of pollutants where
such contribution or change does not meet applicable
standards and requirements or where such contribution
would cause the District to violate its NPDES permit. it
202. PROHIBITION ON DILUTION
No user shall increase the use of water or in any other L
manner attempt to dilute a discharge as a partial or
complete substitute for treatment to achieve compliance
with this Ordinance and the user's permit or to establish
an artificially high flow rate for permit mass emission
rates.
203. LIMITATIONS ON SURFACE RUNOFF AND GROUNDWATER
A. Groundwater, surface runoff, or subsurface drainage
shall not be discharged directly or indirectly to the
District's sewerage facilities except as provided
herein. Pursuant to Section 305, et seq. , the y„
District may approve the discharge of such water only
when no alternate method of disposal is reasonably
available or to mitigate an environmental risk or
health hazard.
B. The discharge of such waters shall require a Special
Purpose Discharge Permit from the District.
C. If a permit is granted for the discharge of such water
into a public sewer, the user shall pay the applicable b
charges established herein and shall meet such other
conditions as required by the District.
5
YY
204. LIMITATIONS ON UNPOLLUTED WATER
A. Unpolluted water such as single pass cooling water
shall not be discharged directly or indirectly to the
District's sewerage facilities except as provided
herein. Pursuant to Section 305, et seq. , the
�r
21
IN
District may approve the discharge of such water only
when no alternate method of disposal or reuse is
reasonably available or to mitigate an environmental
e risk or health hazard.
- B. The discharge of such waters shall require a Special
Purpose Discharge Permit from the District.
w
C. If a permit is granted for the discharge of such water
into a public sewer, the user shall pay the applicable
charges established herein and shall meet such other
conditions as required by the District.
®' 205. LIMITATIONS ON RADIOACTIVE WASTES
No person shall discharge, or cause to be discharged, any
radioactive waste into a public sewer except:
A. When the person is authorized to use radioactive
materials by the State Department of Health or other
governmental agency empowered to regulate the use of
radioactive materials;
.. B. When the waste is discharged in strict conformity with
current California Radiation Control Regulations
(California Administrative Code, Title 17) for safe
m disposal;
C. When the person is in compliance with all rules and
regulations of all other applicable regulatory
agencies; and,
D. When a Class I permit has been obtained from CSDOC.
w
206. LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF GRINDERS
Waste from industrial or commercial grinders shall not be
discharged into a public sewer, except wastes generated in
packing or preparing food or food products. Such grinders
must shred the waste to a degree that all particles will
be carried freely under normal flow conditions prevailing
in the public sewer.
207. LIMITATIONS ON POINT OF DISCHARGE
a„ No person, except local sewering agencies involved in
maintenance functions of sanitary sewer facilities, shall
discharge any wastewater directly into a manhole or other
r
opening in a sewer other than through an approved building
22
V
er
sewer, unless approved by District upon written �
application by the user and payment of the applicable fees
and charges established herein.
b
208. LIMITATIONS ON WASTEHAULER DISCHARGES
A wastehauler/user proposing to discharge septic tank,
cesspool wastes or other biodegradable or compatible
material into a District's facility must have both a valid
Orange County Health Department Permit and a CSDOC
Wastehauler Permit as required by Section 306. Such
wastewaters shall be discharged only at a location
specified by the District.
y
No wastehauler/user shall discharge constituents in excess
of those specified in the respective permit based on the
limits in Table I.
No wastehauler shall discharge to the District any
material defined as hazardous waste by RCRA or 40 CFR 261.
209. LIMITATIONS ON WASTEWATER STRENGTH AND CHARACTERISTICS
A. No person shall discharge wastewater in excess of the L'
permitted mass emission rates or limits as determined
in accordance with Section 210 and/or Table I.
b
B. No person shall discharge wastewater:
1. Having a temperature higher than 140 degrees y,
Fahrenheit, (60 degrees Centigrade) , or which
causes the temperature at the treatment plant to
exceed 104 degrees Fahrenheit (40 degrees
Centigrade) . W
2. Having a pH less than 6.0 or greater than 12.0. i
w
3. Containing in excess of 0.01 mg/L of
polychlorinated biphenyls as a daily maximum to
include, but not limited to the following: V
Aroclors 1016, 1221, 1228, 1232, 1242; 1248, 1254,
1260, and 1262.
7
4. Containing in excess of 0.01 mg/L of pesticides as w
a daily maximum, to include, but not limited to
the following: DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloro-
ethane, both isomers) , DOE (dichlorodiphenyl-
ethylene) , DDD (dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane) ,
Aldrin, Benzene Hexachloride (alpha [a] , beta [p] ,
and gamma isomers) , Chlordane, Endrin, Endrin
23
6
v
aldehyde, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
_ (TCDD) , toxaphene, a-endosulfan, P-endosulfan,
Endosulfan sulfate, Heptachlor, Heptachlor
.. epoxide, and Dieldrin.
5. Having a maximum Biochemical Oxygen Demand (HOD)
w greater than 15,000 pounds per day; or exceeding a
30-day SOD average of 10,000 pounds per day.
6. Containing excessive flow or other materials,
including, but not limited to, ammonia, chemical
oxygen demand, total organic carbon, priority
pollutants, suspended solids, oil and grease of
animal or vegetable origin, total dissolved
solids, and phenolic compounds released in a
discharge at a flow rate and/or concentration
which will cause problems, pass through, or
.. interference with the sewerage facilities.
7. Producing a gaseous mixture that is 10% or greater
of the lower explosive limit (LEL) . Prohibited
materials include, but are not limited to,
gasoline, kerosenes, naphtha, benzene, toluene,
xylene, ethers, ketones, and alcohols.
w
S. Containing material which will readily settle or
cause an obstruction to flow in the sewer
resulting in interference, such as, but not
limited to, sand, mud, glass, metal filings,
diatomaceous earth, asphalt, dead animals, wood,
bones, hair, and fleshings.
9. In violation of any applicable Federal Categorical
Pretreatment Standards, State standards or other
local regulations covering wastewater disposal.
210. MASS EMISSION RATE DETERMINATION
r
A. Mass emission rates for non-compatible and/or
compatible pollutants that are present or anticipated
in the user's wastewater discharge may be set for each
user and made an applicable part of each user's
permit. These rates shall be based on Table I, Local
Discharge Limits, or Federal Categorical Pretreatment
Standards, and the user's average daily wastewater
discharge for the past three years, the most recent
representative data, or other data acceptable to the
¢+ District. All mass emission rates must receive final
approval by the General Manager.
24
r
b
N
B. To verify the user's operating data, the District may
require a user to submit an inventory of all
wastewater streams and/or records indicating
production rates.
TABLE 1
w
LOCAL DISCHARGE LIMITS, mg/1
M
CONSTITUENT MILLIGRAMS/LITER
Arsenic 2.0 'ow
Cadmium 1.0
Chromium (Total) 2.0
Copper 3.0 ,
Lead 2.0
Mercury 0.03
Nickel 10.0
Silver 5.0 id
Zinc 10.0
Cyanide (Total) 5.0
Cyanide (Amenable) 1.0 yr
Polychlorinated Biphenyls 0.01
Pesticides 0.01
Total Toxic Organics 0.58
Sulfide (Total) 5.0 1'
Sulfide (Dissolved) 0.5,
Oil and grease of mineral, petroleum,
origin 100.0
DOMESTIC WASTE DISCHARGE LIMITS
FOR
WASTEBAULERS
CONSTITUENT MILLIGRAMS/LITER Ipd
Cadmium 1.0
Chromium 2.0
Copper 25.0
Lead 10.0
Nickel 10.0
Zinc 50.0 L+
a: Subject to more stringent standards as established by
Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards. y
,
b
25
.+
C. The District may revise limits or mass emission rates
previously established in the discharger's permit at
any time, based on: current or anticipated operating
r data of the discharger or the District; the District's
ability to meet NPDES limits; or changes in the
requirements of Regulatory Agencies.
D. The excess use of water to establish an artificially
high flow rate for mass emission rate determination is
prohibited.
r
r 211. PROHIBITION ON INFECTIOUS WASTE
The District shall have the authority to require that any
discharge of an infectious waste to the sewer be rendered
r non-infectious prior to discharge if the infectious waste
is deemed to pose a threat to the public health and
safety, or will result in any violation of applicable
® waste discharge requirements.
212. LIMITATIONS ON DISPOSAL OF SPENT INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS AND
'+ SLUDGES
A. Spent solutions, sludges, and materials of quantity or
quality in violation of, or prohibited by this
Ordinance, or any permit issued under this Ordinance
must be disposed of in a legal manner at a legally
acceptable point of disposal as defined by the
District or appropriate Regulatory Agency. All waste
manifests shall be retained for a minimum of three
years, and made available to the District upon
request.
B. No person shall batch dump. Non-compliance fees
applicable for such discharge will be as shown in
Article 6, Schedule C of Tables II and III, Fees for
Non-Compliance with Permit Conditions and Mass
Emission Rate Limits,
4
V"
26
ARTICLE 3
DISCHARGE PERMITS, CHARGES, AND FEES
w 301. INTRODUCTION
A. To provide the maximum public benefit from the use
.c of District facilities, written authorization to use
said facilities is required. This written
authorization shall be in the form of a discharge
permit. No vested right shall be given by issuance
of permits provided for in this ordinance.
B. The discharge permit shall be in one of six forms
=e and is dependent upon the type of discharger,
volume, and characteristics of discharge. The six
discharge permits are:
1. Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit.
2. Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit.
r
3. Class III Wastewater Discharge Permit.
4. Special Purpose Discharge Permit.
5. Wastehauler Discharge Permit.
^� 6. Transportable Treatment Unit Discharge Permit.
302. CLASS I WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS
- A. Class I wastewater discharge permits shall be
expressly subject to all provisions of this Ordinance
'y and all other regulations, charges for use, and fees
established by the District. The conditions of
wastewater discharge permits shall be uniformly
,.. enforced by the District in accordance with this
Ordinance and applicable State and Federal
Regulations.
B. All Class I users proposing to discharge into a public
sewer shall obtain a wastewater discharge permit by
filing an application pursuant to Section 302.1 and
paying the applicable fees pursuant to Section 302.3
before discharging. For purposes of this Ordinance, a
Class I user is any user:
v
27
r
1. Discharging wastewater which may contain at any y
given time, any of the components that the
Districts determine necessary to regulate as
specified in Section 205, Limitations on
Radioactive Wastes; Section 209, Limitations on
Wastewater Strength and Characteristics, or
Section 210, Mass Emission Rate Determination,
Table I. Local Discharge Limits; 1.+
2. Subject to Federal Categorical Pretreatment
Standards.
M
3. Discharging wastewater which may cause, as
determined by the General Manager, pass through or
interference with the District's system.
302.1 Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit Application
A. Users seeking a Class I wastewater discharge permit
shall complete and file with the District, prior to
commencing discharge, an application on the form
_ prescribed by the District. The user shall be e+
required to submit, in units and terms appropriate
for evaluation, the following information:
1. Name, address, assessor's parcel number(s) ,
S.I.C. number(s) , description of the
manufacturing process or service activity,
b
2. (Whichever is applicable) name, address of any
and all principals/owners/major shareholders of
company; Articles of Incorporation; most recent
Report of the Secretary of State; Business
License;
3. Volume of wastewater to be discharged; ~'
4. Name of individual who can be served with
notices other than officers of corporation; y
5. Name and address of property owner, landlord
and/or manager of the property; L.
6. Water supplier and water account numbers;
7. Wastewater constituents and characteristics as it
deemed necessary by the District, including, but
not limited to, those mentioned in Section 210,
Mass Emission Rate Determination. Table I.
Discharge Limits, of this Ordinance. These
constituents and characteristics shall be
w
28
V
determined by a laboratory of the discharger
approved by the District;
S. Time and duration of discharge;
9. Number of employees and average hours of work
V per employee per day;
10. Waste minimization and water conservation
practices;
w
11. Production records, if applicable;
.y 12. Waste manifests, if applicable;
13. Landscaped area in square feet, if applicable;
., 14. Tons of cooling tower capacity, if applicable;
15. EPA Hazardous Waste Generator Number, if
applicable.
B. Users may also be required to submit site plans,
floor plans, mechanical and plumbing plans, and
details to show all sewers, spill containment,
clarifiers and appurtenances by size, location and
elevation for evaluation.
e
C. Other information may be required to properly
evaluate the permit application.
^V D. After evaluation of the data, the District may issue
a wastewater discharge permit, subject to terms and
conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as
otherwise determined by the General Manager to be
necessary to protect the District's system.
302.2 Class I Permit Conditions, and Limitations
The issuance of a Class I permit may contain any of the
following conditions or limitations:
A. Mass emission rates regulating non-compatible
pollutants;
® B. Limits on rate and time of discharge or requirements
for flow regulation and equalization;
C. Requirements to notify the District in writing prior
to the physical expansion of any wet processes;
w
29
I�
D. Requirements for the user to construct and maintain, W
at his own expense, pH control, flow monitoring
and/or sampling facilities;
E. Requirements for submission of technical reports,
production data, discharge reports, and/or waste
manifests;
w
F. Requirements to self-monitor;
G. Requirements for maintaining a minimum of three
years, plant records relating to wastewater
discharge and waste manifests as specified by
District; i .
H. Predetermined rates or values for wastewater
strength characteristics;
I. Requirements to submit copies of tax and water
bills;
J. Other provisions which may be applicable to ensure
compliance with this Ordinance;
K. Other terms and conditions determined by the General
Manager to be necessary to protect the District's
system.
i
302.3 Class I Permit Fee 6'
A. The Class I permit fee shall be in an amount adopted
by resolution of the Board of Directors. The permit L
fee shall be payable within forty-five . (45) days of
invoicing by the District. Payment of permit must
be received by the District prior to issuance of
either a new permit or a renewed permit. Permittee
shall also pay any delinquent invoices in full prior
to permit renewal. -
w
B. Any permit issued for a location wherein the
Permittee is not the property owner may be
conditioned upon depositing financial security to
guarantee payment of all annual fees and charges to
be incurred, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 623 . (E) of this Ordinance. 1 .
V
302.4 Terms and Conditions
A. The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be
subject to modification and change in the sole w
determination by the District during the life of the
permit based on: `
30 Yr
L
1. The discharger's current or anticipated
operating data.
2. The District's current or anticipated operating
data.
3. Changes in the requirements of Regulatory
Agencies which affect the District.
^� B. New source indirect dischargers shall be required to
install and start up any necessary pollution control
equipment before beginning discharge, and comply
,r with applicable Federal Categorical Pretreatment
Standards not to exceed thirty (30) days after the
commencement of discharge.
C. The permittee shall request a modification to the
terms and conditions of an issued permit prior to
increasing the contribution of flow, pollutants, or
,r changing the nature of pollutants where such
contribution or change will cause the permittee to
be in violation of their permit or this Ordinance.
The request shall be in writing stating the
requested change, and the reasons for the change.
The District shall review the request, make a
determination on the request, and respond in
,., writing. The Districts' approval may be granted or
denied.
D. Permittee shall be informed of any change in the
permit limitations, conditions, or requirements at
least forty-five (45) days prior to the effective
date of change. Any changes or new conditions in
,F the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule
for compliance.
302.5 Permit Duration and Renewal
Class I permits shall normally be issued for a period
not to exceed one (1) year. Upon expiration of the
d permit, the user shall apply for renewal of the permit
in accordance with the provisions of this Article 3.
W 302.6 Class I Charge for Use
A. The purpose of a charge for use is to ensure that
each recipient of sewerage service from the District
pays its reasonably proportionate share of all the
costs of providing that sewerage service. Charges
for use to recover the cost of conveying, treating
w
and disposing of sewage in District facilities are
31
.d
I4d
exclusive of any fees levied by local sewering W
agencies. The charge for use shall be based on the
total maintenance, operation, capital expenditures
and reserve requirements for providing wastewater 6o
collection, treatment and disposal.
B. A discharger who is issued a Class I wastewater 6
discharge permit under the provisions of this
Ordinance shall pay a charge for use in accordance
with the formula contained herein and the unit L
charge rates adopted annually by resolution of the
Board of Directors. These fees shall be invoiced on
a quarterly basis. The quarterly invoice shall be
based upon an estimate of the annual use as 1.+
determined by the District. Annually, the District
shall compute the charge for use based upon actual
use for the preceding 12-month period on an annual
reconciliation statement. The charge for use is
payable within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by
the District. A credit will be allowed for the
annual ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the b
District for the property for which a permit has
been issued by the District. A credit will also be
allowed for any supplemental user fee adopted by the
Board of Directors by separate ordinance.
C. If current property tax bills are not supplied by
the permittee to the District by May 31 of each year
for use in determining the ad valorem tax credit
and/or the supplemental user fee credit, the
District will endeavor to obtain the correct data. 1
61
Data obtained by the District will be considered
correct and will not be adjusted before the next
annual reconciliation statement. There will be a
fee levied for District administrative costs when ad
valorem property tax and/or supplemental user fee
data is obtained by the District. The amount of the
fee shall be adopted by the District's Board of v
Directors.
D. To determine actual annual water use the District L
normally requires copies of actual water bills as a
permit condition. If these water bill copies are
not received by July 31 of each year for the
12-month period ended closest to June 30, the L
District will endeavor to obtain the correct water
use data. Data obtained by the District will be
considered correct and will not be adjusted before L
the next annual reconciliation statement. There
will be a fee levied for District administrative
costs when water use data is obtained by the
32
6
Li
District. The amount of the fee shall be adopted by
the District's Board of Directors.
E. The charge for use shall be computed by the
following formula:
Charge for Use = V,V + B,B + S,S - Tax Credit
Where V = total annual volume of flow, in millions
of gallons
B = total annual discharge of biochemical oxygen
demand, in thousands of pounds
.. S = total annual discharge of suspended solids, in
thousands of pounds
.. V„B„S, = unit charge rates adopted annually by
resolution of the District's Board of Directors,
based upon the funding requirements of providing
sewerage service, in dollars per unit as described
in Paragraph F below:
F. The unit charge rates in the charge for use formula
shall be established annually and shall be
determined by the following method:
`. 1. An Operations and Maintenance Service Charge for
the total annual operation and maintenance
funding requirements of the sewerage system
shall be allocated among the three wastewater
^' charge parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD) , and suspended solids in accordance
with the General Manager's determination as to
the costs associated with each parameter and
pursuant to applicable requirements of State and
Federal Regulatory Agencies. The operation and
maintenance costs as distributed to flow,
biochemical oxygen demand, and suspended solids
shall be divided by the projected annual total
flow volume and weights of biochemical oxygen
r. demand and suspended solids to be treated by the
sewerage system in the budgeted year.
2. A Capital Facilities Replacement Service charge
for capital replacement and capital improvement
shall be levied at a rate to be determined
annually the Board of Directors. This charge
shall be allocated among wastewater charge
parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen demand,
and suspended solids in accordance with the
General Manager's determination of which portion
33
r
L
of the charge predominantly relates to each
parameter. The capital facilities charge
distributed to biochemical oxygen demand, and
suspended solids shall be divided by the
projected annual weights of biochemical oxygen
demand and suspended solids to be treated by the
sewerage system in the budgeted year. L
3. The unit charge rates for each respective LL..aa
wastewater parameter in (1) and (2) above shall
be summed. The unit wastewater charge rates so L
determined will be expressed in dollars per
million gallons for V„ and in dollars per
thousand pounds for B. and S..
U
G. Other measurements of the organic content of the
wastewater of a discharger, such as COD or TOC, may
be used instead of BOD. However, the discharger
must establish to the General Manager's satisfaction Lr
a relationship between the SOD of the wastewater and
the parameter of measure. This relationship shall
be used by the District in determining the charge
for use. When wastewater from sanitary facilities
is discharged separately from the other wastewater
of a discharger, the charge for use for discharging W
the sanitary wastewater may be determined by using
the following:
1. 10,000 gallons per employee per year; W
2. BOD and suspended solids to be calculated at
domestic wastewater strength per employee per
year.
The number of employees will be considered as the
average number of people employed full-time on a 6'
daily basis. This may be determined by averaging
the number of people employed at the beginning and
end of each quarter, or other period that reflects jN
normal employment fluctuations.
303 . CLASS II WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS L
A. Class II wastewater discharge permits shall be
expressly subject to all provisions of this 6W
Ordinance and all other regulations, charges for use
and fees established by the District. The
conditions of wastewater discharge permits shall be
uniformly enforced by the District in accordance
with this Ordinance and applicable State and Federal
Regulations.
34
Ir
L
ti
B. All Class II users proposing to discharge into a
public sewer shall a wastewater discharge permit by
filing an application pursuant to Section 303.1 and
paying the applicable fees pursuant to Section 303.3
before discharging. For purposes of this Ordinance,
r a Class II user is any user:
1. Whose charge for use is greater than the ad
valorem tax basic levy allocated to the
District.
2. Discharging waste other than sanitary; and,
3. Not otherwise required to obtain a Class I
permit.
303.1 Class II Wastewater Discharge permit Application
A. Users seeking a Class II wastewater discharge permit
.. shall complete and file with the District, prior to
commencing discharge, an application on the form
prescribed by the District. The user shall be
required to submit, in units and terms appropriate
for evaluation, the following information:
1. Name, address, assessor's parcel number(s) and
S.I.C. number(s) ; description of the
manufacturing process or service activity.
2. (Whichever is applicable) Name, address of any
and all principals/owners/major shareholders of
company; Articles of Incorporation; most recent
Report of the Secretary of State; Business
,r License;
3. Volume of wastewater to be discharged;
"0 4. Name of individual who can be served with
notices other than officers of corporation;
.. 5. Name and address of property owner, landlord
and/or manager of the property;
6. Water supplier and water account numbers;
7. Wastewater constituents and characteristics as
deemed necessary by the District, including, but
not limited to, those mentioned in Section 210,
Mass Emission Rate Determination. Table I.
Discharge Limits of this Ordinance. These
w
constituents and characteristics shall be
35
r
determined by a laboratory of the discharger
approved by the District;
8. Time and duration of discharge;
9. Number of employees and average hours of work �J
per employee per day;
�i
10. Waste minimization and water conservation
practices.
11. Production records, if applicable;
i
12. Waste manifests, if applicable;
W
13. Landscaped area in square feet, if applicable;
14. Tons of cooling tower capacity, if applicable; y
15. EPA Hazardous Waste Generator Number, if
applicable.
V'
B. Users may also be required to submit site plans,
floor plans, mechanical and plumbing plans, and
details to show all sewers, spill containment,
clarifiers, pretreatment systems, and appurtenances
by size, location and elevation for evaluation.
C. Other information may be required to properly
evaluate the permit application.
D. After evaluation of the data furnished, the District r,
may issue a wastewater discharge permit, subject to
terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and
as otherwise determined by the General Manager to be
necessary to protect the District's system.
303.2 Class II Permit Conditions and Limitations
The issuance of a Class II permit may contain any of the
following conditions or limitations.
A. Limits on rate and time of discharge or requirements
for flow regulations and equalization;
B. Requirements to notify the District in writing prior �.
to the physical expansion of any wet processes;
C. Requirements for the user to construct and maintain,
at his own expense, pH control, flow monitoring
and/or sampling facilities;
W
36 II
L
b
D. Requirements for submission of technical reports or
discharge reports and waste manifests;
.. E. Requirements to self-monitor;
F. Requirements for maintaining plant records relating
to wastewater discharge and waste manifests as
specified by District;
G. Predetermined rates or values for wastewater
v strength characteristics;
H. Requirement to submit copies of tax and water bills;
.. I. other provisions which may be applicable to ensure
compliance with this ordinance;
.d J. Other terms and conditions determined by the General
Manager to be necessary to protect the District's
system.
303.3 Class II Permit Fee
A. The Class II permit fee shall be in an amount
adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors.
The permit fee shall be payable within forty-five
(45) days of invoicing by the District. Payment of
permit fees must be received by the District prior
to issuance of either a new permit or a renewed
permit. Permittee shall also pay any delinquent
invoices in full prior to permit renewal.
r
B. Any permit issued for a location wherein the
Permittee is not the property owner may be
conditioned upon depositing financial security to
guarantee payment of all annual fees and charges to
be incurred, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 623. (E) of this Ordinance.
303.4 Terms and Conditions
,. A. The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be
subject to modification and change in the sole
determination by the District during the life of the
permit based on:
1. The discharger's current or anticipated
operating data.
to
2. The District's current or anticipated operating
data.
37
m
Y.
3. Changes in the requirements of Regulatory 1r
Agencies.
B. The permittee shall request a modification to the L
terms and conditions of an issued permit prior to
increasing the contribution of flow, pollutants, or
changing the nature of pollutants where such
contribution or change will cause the permittee to 6.
be in violation of their permit or this Ordinance.
The request shall be in writing stating the
requested change, and the reasons for the change. `,
The District shall review the request, make a
determination on the request, and respond in
writing. The Districts' approval may be granted or
denied. r
C. Permittee shall be informed of any change in the
permit limitations, conditions, or requirements at
least forty-five (45) days prior to the effective
date of change. Any changes or new conditions in
the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule
for compliance. 6+
303.5 Permit Duration and Renewal
Class II permits shall be issued for a period not to v
exceed three (3) years. Upon expiration of the permit
the user shall apply for renewal of the permit in
accordance with the provisions of this Article 3.
303.6 Class II Charce for Use
A. The purpose of a charge for use is to ensure that V
each recipient of sewerage service from the District
pays its reasonably proportionate share of all the L
costs of providing that sewerage service. Charges
for use to recover the cost of conveying, treating,
and disposing of sewage in District facilities are
exclusive of any fees levied by local sewering
agencies. The charge for use shall be based on the
total maintenance, operation, capital expenditures
and reserve requirements for providing wastewater L
collection, treatment and disposal.
B. A discharger who is issued a Class II wastewater `
discharge permit under the provisions of this u
Ordinance shall pay a charge for use in accordance
with the formula contained herein and the unit
charge rates adopted annually by resolution of the L,
Board of Directors. These fees shall be invoiced on
a quarterly basis. The quarterly invoice shall be
based upon an estimate of the annual use as L
38
L
determined by the District. Annually, the District
shall compute the charge for use based upon actual
use for the preceding 12-month period on an annual
reconciliation statement. The charge for use is
payable within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by
the District. A credit will be allowed for the
annual ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the
District for the property for which a permit has
been issued by the District. A credit will also be
allowed for any supplemental user fee adopted by the
Board of Directors by separate ordinance.
C. If current property tax bills are not supplied by
the permittee to the District by May 31 of each year
for use in determining the ad valorem tax credit
and/or the supplemental user fee credit, the
District will endeavor to obtain the correct data.
Data obtained by the District will be considered
correct and will not be adjusted before the next
annual reconciliation process. There will be a fee
levied for District administrative costs when ad
valorem property tax and/or supplemental user fee
data is obtained by the District. The amount of the
fee is to be adopted by the District's Board of
Directors.
D. To determine actual annual use the District normally
m requires copies of actual water bills as a permit
condition. If these water bill copies are not
received by July 31 of each year for the 12-month
period ended closest to June 30, the District will
endeavor to obtain the correct water use data. Data
obtained by the District will be considered correct
and will not be adjusted before the next annual
reconciliation process. There will be a fee levied
for District administrative costs when water use
data is obtained by the District. The amount of the
fee shall be adopted by the District's Board of
Directors.
E. The charge for use shall be computed by the
w following formula:
Charge for Use = V,V + B,B + S,S - Tax Credit
Where V = total annual volume of flow, in millions
of gallons
B = total annual discharge of biochemical oxygen
demand, in thousands of pounds
39
S = total annual discharge of suspended solids, in 'y
thousands of pounds
V„B„S, - unit charge rates adopted annually by
resolution of the District's Board of Directors,
based upon the funding requirements of providing
sewerage service, in dollars per unit as described
in Paragraph F below.
F. The unit charge rates in the charge for use formula
shall be established annually and shall be V
determined by the following method:
1. An Operations and Maintenance Service Charge for
1
the total annual operation and maintenance V
funding requirements of the sewerage system
shall be allocated among the three wastewater
charge parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen
demand and suspended solids in accordance with �•
the General Manager's determination as to the
costs associated with each parameter and
pursuant to applicable requirements of State and v
Federal Regulatory Agencies. The operation and
maintenance costs as distributed to flow,
biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids
shall be divided by the projected annual total
flow volume and weights of biochemical oxygen
demand and suspended solids to be treated by the
sewerage system in the budgeted year. V
2. A capital Facilities Replacement Service charge
for capital replacement and capital improvement r,
shall be levied at a rate to be determined
annually by the Board of Directors. This charge
shall be allocated among the three wastewaterI,
charge parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen r'
demand and suspended solids in accordance with
the General Manager's determination of which
portion of the charge predominantly relates to
each parameter. The capital facilities charge
distributed to biochemical oxygen demand and
suspended solids shall be divided by the
projected annual weights of biochemical oxygen W
demand and suspended solids to be treated by the
sewerage system in the budgeted year.
3. The unit charge rates for each respective
wastewater parameter in (1) and (2) above shall
be summed. The unit wastewater charge rates so
determined will be expressed in dollars per 6.0
million gallons for V„ and in dollars per
thousand pounds for B. and S..
4 L.0
W
Ir
G. Other measurements of the organic content of the
wastewater of a discharger, such as COD or TOC, may
be used instead of BOD. However, the discharger
must establish to the General Manager's satisfaction
a relationship between the BOD of the wastewater and
the other parameter of measure. This relationship
shall be used by the District in determining the
charge for use. When wastewater from sanitary
facilities is discharged separately from the other
wastewater of a discharger, the charge for use for
discharging the sanitary wastewater may be
determined by using the following:
d
1. 10,000 gallons per employee per year;
2. BOD and suspended solids to be calculated at
domestic wastewater strength per employee per
year.
(The number of employees will be considered as
the average number of people employed full-time
on a daily basis. This may be determined by
` averaging the number of people employed at the
beginning and end of each quarter, or other
period that reflects normal employment
d+ fluctuations. )
304. CLASS III WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS
A. Class III wastewater discharge permits shall be
expressly subject to all provisions of this
Ordinance and all other regulations, charges for use
and fees established by the District. The
conditions of wastewater discharge permits shall be
r uniformly enforced by the District in accordance
with this Ordinance and applicable State and Federal
Regulations.
B. All Class III users proposing to discharge into a
public sewer shall obtain a wastewater discharge
permit by filing an application pursuant to Section
304.1 and paying the applicable fees pursuant to
Section 304.3 before discharging. For purposes of
this Ordinance, a Class III user is any user:
1. Discharging only sanitary waste;
2. Not required to obtain a Class I or Class Ii
,d permit; and
3. Whose charge for use is greater than the ad
valorem basic levy tax paid to the District.
41
N
C. Unless otherwise stipulated in the permit, Class I22
users shall be considered to discharge a domestic
waste equivalent for BOD and suspended solids.
304.1 Class III Wastewater Discharge Permit Application
A. Users seeking a Class III wastewater discharge L,
permit shall complete and file with the District,
prior to commencing discharge, an application on the
form prescribed by the District. The user may be
required to submit, in units and terms appropriate
for evaluation, the following information:
1. Name, address, assessor's parcel number(s) , Ir
S.I.C. number(s) , description of the
manufacturing process or service activity;
2. (Whichever is applicable) name, address of any
and all principals/owners/major shareholders of
company; Articles of Incorporation; most recent
Report of the Secretary of State; Business it
License;
3. Volume of wastewater to be discharged;
4. Name of individual who can be served with
notices other than officers of corporation;
V
5. Name and address of property owner, landlord
and/or manager of the property;
v
6. water supplier and water account numbers;
7. Time and duration of discharge;
8. Water conservation practices. .d
9. Tons of cooling tower capacity;
10. Number of employees and average hours of work
per employee per day;
11. Landscaped area in square feet, if applicable;
B. Users may also be required to submit site plans, Ir
floor plan, mechanical and plumbing plans and
details to show all sewers, spill containment,
clarifiers, pretreatment systems, and appurtenances
by size, location and elevation for evaluation.
1
42
6w
V
m C. Other information may be required to properly
evaluate the permit application.
m D. After evaluation and acceptance of the data
furnished, the District may issue a discharge
permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in
this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the
' General Manager to be necessary to protect the
District's system.
r 304.2 Class III Permit Conditions and Limitations
The issuance of a Class III permit may contain any of
m the following conditions or limitations:
A. Requirement to submit tax and water bills;
m B. Predetermined rate or value for BOO and suspended
solids.
304.3 Class III Permit Fee
A. The Class III permit fee shall be in an amount
adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors.
The permit fee shall be payable within forty-five
(45) days of invoicing by the District. Payment of
permit fees must be received by the District prior
to issuance of either a new permit or a renewed
permit. Permittee shall also pay any delinquent
invoices in full prior to permit renewal.
B. Any permit issued for a location wherein the
Permittee is not the property owner may be
conditioned upon depositing financial security to
guarantee payment of all annual fees and charges to
be incurred, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 623. (E) of this Ordinance.
304.4 Terms and Conditions
A. The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be
r subject to modification and change in the sole
determination by the District during the life of the
permit based on:
1. The discharger-s current or anticipated
operating data.
2. The District's current or anticipated operating
data.
d
43
d
3. Changes in the requirements of Regulatory V
Agencies.
B. Permittee may request a modification to the terms L
and conditions of an issued permit. The request
shall be in writing stating the requested change,
and the reasons for the change. The Districts shall
review the request, make a determination on the L+
request, and respond in writing.
C. Permittee shall be informed of any changes in the b
permit limitations, conditions, or requirements at
least forty-five (45) days prior to the effective
date of change. Any changes or new conditions in
the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule V
for compliance.
304.5 Permit Duration and Renewal V
Class III permits shall be issued for a period not to
exceed three (3) years. Upon expiration of the permit,
the user shall apply for renewal of the permit in
accordance with the provisions of this Article 3.
304.6 Class III Charge For Use y
A. The purpose of a charge for use is to ensure that
each recipient of sewerage service from the District
pays its reasonably proportionate share of all costs
of providing that sewerage service. Charges for use
to recover the cost of conveying, treating, and
disposing of sewage in District's facilities are Lr
exclusive of any fees levied by local severing
agencies. The charge for use shall be based on the
total maintenance, operation, capital expenditures
and reserve requirements for providing wastewater
collection, treatment and disposal.
B. A discharger who is issued a Class III wastewater Li
discharge permit under the provisions of this
Ordinance shall pay a charge for use in accordance
with the provisions contained herein and the unit
charge rates adopted annually by resolution of the
Board of Directors. This charge shall be determined
as follows:
u
1. An operations and Maintenance service Charge for
the total annual operation and maintenance
funding requirements of the sewerage system - L,
established in the adopted budget shall .be
allocated to a wastewater flow charge. The
operation and maintenance costs as distributed 'L
44
V
y
to flow shall be divided by the projected annual
flow volume to be treated by the sewerage system
in the budgeted year.
e.
2. A Capital Facilities Replacement Service charge
for capital replacement and capital improvements
shall be levied at a rate determined by the
Board of Directors.
3. The charge rate for the wastewater parameter of
flow as determined in (1) and (2) above shall be
summed, and the rate so determined will be
expressed in dollars per million gallons.
` 4. The District shall invoice the user on a
quarterly basis in accordance with policies and
procedures adopted by the General Manager. The
.+ quarterly estimatedcharge for use shall be
calculated by multiplying the charge rate as
determined in (3) above and the estimated volume
of wastewater discharged. Annually, the
District shall compute the charge for use based
upon actual use for the preceding 12-month
period on an annual reconciliation statement.
The charge for use is payable within forty-five
(45) days of invoicing by the District. A
credit will be allowed for the annual ad valorem
tax basic levy allocated to the District for the
property for which a permit has been issued by
the District. A credit will also be allowed for
any supplemental user fee adopted by the Board
of Directors by separate ordinance.
C. If current property tax bills are not supplied by the
permittee to the District by May 31 of each year for
use in determining the ad valorem tax credit and/or
the supplemental user fee credit, the District will
endeavor to obtain the correct data.
Data obtained by the District will be considered
correct and will not be adjusted before the next
r annual reconciliation process. There will be a fee
levied for District administrative costs when ad
valorem property tax and/or supplemental user fee data
is obtained by the District. The amount of the fee
shall be adopted by the District's Board of Directors.
D. To determine actual annual use the District normally
requires copies of actual water bills as a permit
condition. If these water bill copies are not
received by July 31 of each year for the 12-month
m period ended closest to June 30, the District will
45
m
L
endeavor to obtain the correct water use data. Data y
obtained by the District will be considered correct
and will not be adjusted before the next annual
reconciliation statement. There will be a fee levied L
for District administrative costs when water use data
is obtained by the District. The amount of the fee
shall be adopted by the District's Board of Directors.
y
305. SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITS
A. Special purpose discharge permits shall be expressly v
subject to all provisions of this Ordinance and all
other regulations, charges for use, and fees
established by the District. The conditions of �r
wastewater discharge permits shall be uniformly
enforced by the District in accordance with this
Ordinance and applicable State and Federal u
Regulations.
B. A special purpose user proposing to discharge
groundwater, surface runoff, subsurface drainage, or
unpolluted water directly or indirectly to the
District's sewerage facilities (see Section 203, v
Limitations on Surface Runoff and Groundwater, and
Section 204, Limitations on Unpolluted Water) shall
obtain a special purpose discharge permit before
discharging. This discharge permit may be granted 6.
when no alternative method of disposal is reasonably
available, or to mitigate an environmental risk or
health hazard. r,
305.1 Special Purpose Discharce Permit Application
I
A. Users seeking a special purpose wastewater
permit shall complete and file with the District,
prior to commencing discharge, an application in the
form prescribed by the District. This application 6W
shall be accompanied by the applicable fees, plumbing
plans, a detailed analysis of the alternatives for
water disposal, or other data as needed by the iW
District for review.
B. After evaluation of the data furnished, the District I .
may issue a special purpose wastewater discharge i..
permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in
this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the
General Manager to be necessary to protect the
District's system, NPDES Permit criteria, sludge
management criteria, or the reuse potential of the
L
46
L
r
water by the District or the Orange County Water
District.
m 305.2 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Conditions and
Limitations
A. Discharge conditions and limitations shall be no less
stringent than Section 205, Limitations on Radioactive
Wastes; Section 209, Limitations on Wastewater
Strength and Characteristics; and Section 210, Mass
Emission Rate Determination. Table I. Local Discharge
Limits.
B. Monitoring requirements for contaminated groundwater
. shall be for those non-compatible pollutants known to
exist in the discharge and at least one analysis prior
to sewer discharge shall be performed for all
constituents contained in the most current
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "Priority
Pollutant" list, excluding asbestos.
C. The District may specify and make part of each
Special Purpose Discharge Permit specific pretreatment
requirements or other terms and conditions determined
by the General Manager to be necessary to protect the
District's Sewerage Facility, Local Sewering Agency,
or to comply with Regulatory Agencies' requirements
,r and to assess user charges.
305.3 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Fee
The special purpose discharge permit fee shall be
paid by the applicant in an amount adopted by resolution
of the Board of Directors. Payment of permit fees must be
v received by the District prior to issuance of either a new
permit or a renewed permit. Permittee shall also pay
delinquent invoices in full prior to permit renewal.
r 305.4 Terms and Conditions
A. The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be
• subject to modification and change in the sole
determination by the District during the life of the
permit based on:
1. The discharger-s current or anticipated operating
data.
^" 2. The District's current or anticipated operating
data.
47
v
3. Changes in the requirements of Regulatory
Agencies.
B. Permittee may request a modification to the terms and V
conditions of an issued permit. The request shall be
in writing stating the requested change, and the
reasons for the change. The District shall review the
L.
request, make a determination on the request, and
respond in writing.
C. Permittee shall be informed of any changes in the 6.
permit at least forty-five (45) days prior to the
effective date of change. Any changes or new
conditions in the permit shall include a reasonable i..
time schedule for compliance.
305.5 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Duration and Renewal y
Special purpose discharge permits shall be issued for a
period not to exceed one (1) year, but may be renewed as
determined by the General Manager. Users seeking permit �+
renewal shall comply with all provisions of this Article
3.
305.6 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Charge for Use y
A charge for use to cover all costs of the District for
providing sewerage service and monitoring shall be V
established by the General Manager. A deposit determined
by the General Manager to be sufficient to pay the
estimated charges for use shall accompany the Special
Purpose Discharge Permit application., and said deposit
shall be applied to the charges for use.
306. WASTERAUIER DISCHARGE PERMIT
A. Wastehauler discharge permits shall be expressly W
subject to all provisions of this Ordinance and all
other regulations, charges for use, and fees
established by the District. The conditions of L
wastehauler discharge permits shall be uniformly
enforced by the District in accordance with this
Ordinance and applicable State and Federal
Regulations.
B. A wastehauler proposing to discharge waste into the
District disposal station shall obtain both
a valid Orange County Health Department Permit (where
applicable) , and a CSDOC Wastehauler Permit.
L
48
Ir
306.1 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Application
A. Users seeking a wastehauler discharge permit shall
complete and file with the District prior to
commencing discharge, an application in a form
prescribed by the District. This application shall be
accompanied by the applicable fees. The user shall be
required to submit, in units and terms appropriate for
evaluation, the following information:
r
1. Name, address, telephone number, and description
of the industries, or clients using the user's
r
services;
2. (Whichever is applicable) Name, address of any
and all principals/owners/major shareholders of
the company; Articles of Incorporation; most
recent Report of the Secretary of State;
Business License;
3. Name and address of leaseholder of the vehicle
or trailer, if applicable;
4. Number of trucks and trailers and the license
numbers and tank hauling capacity of each.
m 5. Orange County Health Department Number.
B. Other information may be required to properly evaluate
the permit application.
C. After evaluation of the data furnished, the District
may issue a wastehauler discharge permit, subject to
terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and
as otherwise determined by the General Manager to be
necessary to protect the District's system.
306.2 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Conditions and Limitations
The issuance of a wastehauler permit may contain any of
the following conditions or limitations:
A. Limitations on discharge of heavy metals and other
priority pollutants.
r
B. Requirements for maintaining and submitting
wastehauling records and waste manifests.
C. Additional requirements as otherwise determined
necessary by the General Manager to protect the
49
r
m
V
District's system or as specified by other Regulatory u
Agencies.
306.3 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Fee �L
The wastehauler discharge permit fee shall be paid by
the applicant in an amount adopted by resolution of the
Boards of Directors. Payment of permit fees must be r
received by the District prior to issuance of either a
new permit or a renewed permit. A permittee shall also
pay any delinquent invoices in full prior to permit V
renewal.
306.4 Transferability � .
The identification decal is non-transferable.
The gate access card is issued to specific permitted
vehicle and is non-transferable unless previously
authorized in writing by the District.
306.5 Terms and Conditions 1.0
A. The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be
subject to modification and change in the sole y
determination by the District during the life of the
permit based on:
I
1. The discharger's current or anticipated u
operating data.
2. The District's current or anticipated operating
data.
3. Changes in the requirements of Regulatory
Agencies.
B. Permittee may request a modification to the terms
and conditions of an issued permit. The request 6W
shall be in writing stating the requested change,
and the reasons for the change. The District shall
review the request, make a determination on the
request, and respond in writing.
C. Permittee shall be informed of any change in the I .
permit limitations, conditions, or requirements at r
least forty-five (45) days prior to the effective
date of change. Any changes or new conditions in
the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule
for compliance.
L
50
V
r
r
306.6 Permit Duration and Renewal
Wastehauler discharge permits shall be issued for a
period not to exceed one (1) year. Upon expiration of
the permit, the user shall apply for renewal of the
permit in accordance with the provisions of this Article
r 3.
306.7 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Charge for Use
A charge for use to cover all costs of the District for
providing the disposal station service and monitoring
shall be established by resolution of the Board of
' Directors.
r 307. TRANSPORTABLE TREATMENT UNIT (TTU) DISCHARGE PERMIT
A. TTU discharge permits shall be expressly subject to
r all provisions of this Ordinance and all other
regulations, charges for use, and fees established
by the District. The conditions of TTU discharge
permits shall be uniformly enforced by the District
r in accordance with this Ordinance and applicable
State and Federal Regulations.
d 307.1 Transportable Treatment Unit Discharge Permit
Application
A. Users seeking a TTU wastewater discharge permit
r shall complete and file with the District, prior to
commencing discharge, an application on the form
prescribed by the District. The user shall be
required to submit, in units and terms appropriate
for evaluation, the following information:
1. Name, address, description of the service
activity, copy of the permit to operate issued
by the State of California;
,a 2. (Whichever is applicable) name, address of any
and all principals/owners/major shareholders of
company; Articles of Incorporation; most recent
Report of the Secretary of State; Business
License;
3. Volume of wastewater to be discharged;
r
4. Name of individual, other than officers of
corporation, who can be served with notices.
51
r
r
V
5. Department of Motor vehicle license plate W
number.
6. EPA Identification Number.
r
B. Users may also be required to submit mechanical and
plumbing plans, and details to show all spill
containment, clarifiers and apurtenances by size, r
location, and elevation for evaluation.
C. Other information may be required to properly
evaluate the permit application.
D. After evaluation of the data furnished, the District
may issue a TTU wastewater discharge permit, subject :.
to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance
and as otherwise determined by the General Manager
to be necessary to protect the District's system.
307.2 TTU Permit Conditions and Limitations
The issuance of a TTU permit may contain any of the �r
following conditions or limitations:
A. Mass emission rates or concentrations regulating heavy
metals and other priority pollutants;
B. Limits on rate and time of discharge or requirements
for flow regulation and equalization; �+
C. Requirements to notify the District in writing 72
hours prior to the discharge of any wet processes.
D. Requirements for the user to construct and maintain,
at his own expense, pH control, flow monitoring, or
sampling facilities;
E. Requirements for submission of technical reports,
discharge reports, wastehauling records, and waste 6w
manifests;
P. Requirements to self-monitor; 1W
G. Requirements for maintaining plant records relating to
wastewater discharge and waste manifests as specified
by District; L,
H. Other provisions which may be applicable to ensure .
compliance with this Ordinance.
y
52
V
YI
" 1. Other terms and conditions determined by the General
Manager to be necessary to protect the District's
system.
m
307.3 TTU Discharae Permit Fee
.d A. The Class TTU permit fee shall be in an amount adopted
by resolution of the Board of Directors. The permit
fee shall be payable within forty-five (45) days of
invoicing by the District. Payment of permit fees
must be received by the District prior to issuance of
either a new permit or a renewed permit. Permittee
shall also pay any delinquent invoices in full prior
to permit renewal.
B. Any permit issued may be conditioned upon depositing
financial security to guarantee payment of all annual
m fees and charges to be incurred, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 623. (E) of this Ordinance.
307.4 Terms and Conditions
A. The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be
subject to modification and change in the sole
.. determination by the District during the life of the
permit based on:
1. The discharger-s current or anticipated operating
data.
2. The Districts' current or anticipated operating
data.
3. Changes in the requirements of Regulatory
Agencies.
B. The permittee shall request a modification to the
terms and conditions of an issued permit prior to
increasing the contribution of flow, pollutants, or
changing the nature of pollutants where such
contribution or change will cause the permittee to be
.� in violation of their permit or this Ordinance. The
request shall be in writing stating the requested
change, and the reasons for the change. The District
shall review the request, make a determination on the
request, and respond in writing. The Districts'
approval may be granted or denied.
C. Permittee shall be informed of any change in the
permit limitations, conditions, or requirements at
least forty-five (45) days prior to the effective date
.. of change. Any changes or new conditions in the
53
permit shall include a reasonable time schedule for it
compliance.
307.5 Permit Duration and Renewal
1.i
TTU permits shall normally be issued for a period not to
exceed one (1) year.
V
308. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY EXEMPTION FROM CHARGES
A. No sewer use charges, as specified in Sections 302.6, u
303.6, and 304.6 herein, shall be payable for the
discharge of sewage or industrial waste from property
within the District boundaries owned or leased by it
local public agencies, provided, that such property is
not used for proprietary purposes. If the District
determines the local public agency is placing a
significant demand on the District's sewerage system,
it may rescind the exemption provided for herein and
assess a charge in an amount related to the cost to
the District of providing the service.
B. Local agencies, for purposes of this Section, shall
include cities, the county, special districts and r,
school districts, but shall not include the United
States Government or the State of California or any
agencies thereof.
v
C. This exemption applies only in those Districts which
do not have an Annual Supplemental Sanitary Sewer Use
Charge established in accordance with Section 703. v
309. EXCESS CAPACITY CHARGE
r
New developments or existing developments that expand
operations that require substantial sewerage facilities
capacity may be subject to an excess capacity facilities Ir
charge in an amount and method to be determined by the
Board of Directors on a case-by-case basis.
310. OUT OF DISTRICT PERMITS/DISCHARGERS
i
Industrial wastewater discharge permits for dischargers r
located outside of the District's service area but
tributary to the District's sewerage facilities, may be
issued by a local sewering agency after approval by the v
District. The District shall have the right of inspection
and sampling of the user's discharge to determine
compliance with industrial waste discharge regulations and
L
54
W
L
will be made under a coordinated plan developed with the
local agency. The more stringent of the industrial waste
discharge regulations and effluent limitations of the
d District and the local agency shall apply to the
discharger.
The fees for use shall be determined by the District and
set forth in a use agreement with the local sewering
agency.
Yd
i
r
.r
55
m
ARTICLE 4
FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS
401. PRETREATMENT FACILITIES
A. All users shall provide wastewater acceptable to the
District, under the limitations established herein
before discharging to any public sewer. Any
facilities required to pretreat or transport
wastewater shall be provided and maintained by a
qualified operator and in proper operating condition
at the user's expense.
B. All users may also be required by the District to
submit waste analysis plans, contingency plans, and
meet other necessary requirements to ensure proper
v, operation of the pretreatment facilities and
compliance with permit limits and this Ordinance.
C. No user shall increase the use of water or in any
other manner attempt to dilute a discharge as a
partial or complete substitute for treatment to
achieve compliance with this Ordinance and the user's
Permit.
402. SPILL CONTAINMENT FACILITIES
r
All users shall provide spill containment for protection
against discharge of prohibited materials or other wastes
s, regulated by this Ordinance. Such protection shall be
designed to secure the discharges and to prevent them from
entering into the system in accordance with reasonable
engineering standards. Such facilities shall be provided
and maintained at the user's expense.
403 . MONITORING/METERING FACILITIES
A. District may require the user to construct and
maintain in proper operating condition at the user's
sole expense, flow monitoring, constituent monitoring
and/or sampling facilities.
B. Any sample taken from a sample box or other
representative sampling location is considered to be
representative of the discharge to the public sewer.
m
56
w
r
C. Monitoring or metering facilities may be required L.i
to include a security closure that can be locked with
a District provided hasp lock during sampling or upon
termination of service. L
D. Location of the monitoring or metering facilities
shall be subject to approval by the District.
Lr
E. Location of the monitoring or metering facilities
shall provide clear and uninterrupted access by the
District. `,
404. DRAWING SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
y
A. Detailed plans shall be submitted to the District for
review of existing or proposed construction of
pretreatment facilities, spill containment facilities,
monitoring facilities, metering facilities, and
operating procedures. District approval shall be
received prior to commencement of construction. The
review of the plans and procedures shall in no way V
relieve the user of the responsibility of modifying
the facilities or procedures in the future, as
necessary, to meet the requirements of this Ordinance
or any requirements of other Regulatory Agencies.
B. Three copies of all drawings shall be submitted for �
review.
C. All drawings shall include:
1. North arrow;
2. Scale size;
r
3. User name and address;
4. Drawing name and drawing number; Ir
5. Date drawn or revised;
6. Name of draftsman and name of person approving
drawing.
D. The District may require drawings to scale depicting
the manufacturing process (waste generating sources) ,
spill containment, pretreatment facilities, and/or
monitoring/metering facilities.
E. The District may require a schematic drawing of the
pretreatment facilities.
57
y
L
F. The District may require the drawings be prepared by a
California Registered Chemical, Mechanical, or Civil
. Engineer.
405. WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS
User shall provide waste minimization plans to conserve
water, investigate product substitution, provide inventory
control, implement employee education, and other steps as
necessary to minimize waste produced.
.y
r
w
r
58
.e
ARTICLE 5
r
MONITORING, REPORTING, NOTIFICATION, AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS
r
501. MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS
r
A. Monitoring for Annual Charge for Use
The wastewater constituents and characteristics of a
discharger needed for determining the annual charge
for use shall be submitted in the form of
self-monitoring reports by the user to the
"^ District, if requested. The frequency of analyses
and reporting shall be set forth in the user's
permit. The analyses of these constituents and
characteristics shall be by a laboratory approved by
the District, and at the sole expense of the
permittee. Analyses performed by District's
personnel may used in the determination of the
annual charge for use.
B. Monitoring for Compliance with Permit Conditions or
r Reporting Reauirements
The District may require reports for self-monitoring
of wastewater constituents and characteristics of
1e the discharger needed for determining compliance
with any limitation, or requirements as specified in
the user's permit, Federal Regulations, or this
r Ordinance. These reports include:
(1) Baseline Monitoring Reports
(2) Compliance Schedule Progress Reports
.. (3) 90-Day Compliance Reports
(4) Periodic Reports on continued compliance
(5) Other reports as required by the District
r
Monitoring reports of the analyses of wastewater
constituents and characteristics shall be in a
r manner and form approved by the District and shall
be submitted upon request of the District. When
applicable, the self-monitoring requirement and
frequency of reporting shall be set forth in the
v user's permit. The analyses of wastewater
constituents and characteristics and the preparation
of the monitoring report shall be done at the sole
expense of the user. Failure by the user to perform
59
r
r
V
any required monitoring and/or to submit monitoring y
reports required by the District shall be a
violation of this Ordinance, may result in
determining whether the permittee is in significant 16.
non-compliance, and be cause for the District to
initiate all necessary tasks and analyses to
determine the wastewater constituents and
characteristics for any limitations and requirements it
specified in the user's permit or in this Ordinance.
The user shall be responsible for any and all
expenses of the District in undertaking such L.
monitoring analyses and preparation of reports.
501.1 Inspection and Sampling Conditions
ri
A. The District may inspect and sample the wastewater
generating and disposal facilities of any user to
ascertain whether the intent of this Ordinance is `,
being met and the user is complying with all
requirements.
H. The District shall have the right to set up on the
user's property or other locations as determined by
the District, such devices as are necessary to conduct
sampling or metering operations. Where a user has
security measures in force, the user shall make
necessary arrangements so that personnel from the
District will be permitted to enter without delay for
the purpose of performing their specific
responsibilities.
C. In order for the District to determine the wastewater it
characteristics of the discharger for purposes of
determining the annual use charge and for compliance
with permit requirements, the user is required to
make available for inspection and copying by the
District all notices, self-monitoring reports, waste
manifests, and records including, but not limited to,
those required in the Federal Pretreatment Ir
Requirements without restriction but subject to the
confidentiality provision set forth in Section 103
herein. All records are to be kept a minimum of three u
(3) years.
501.2 Right of Entry
V
Persons or occupants of premises where wastewater is
created or discharged shall allow the District, or its
representatives, reasonable access during the normal 6+
working day to all parts of the wastewater generating and
disposal facilities for the purposes of inspection and
sampling.
60
y
501.3 Notification of Spill or Slug Loading
A. In the event the discharger is unable to comply with
any of the permit conditions due to a breakdown of
equipment, accidents caused by human error or acts of
God, or the discharge will exceed the provisions of
Section 209, the discharger shall notify the District
by telephone as soon as the discharger has knowledge
of the incident.
B. Confirmation of this notification shall be made in
,r writing as soon as possible, but no later than five
(5) working days from the telephone notification. The
written notification shall state the date of the
incident, the reasons for the discharge or spill, what
^� steps were taken to immediately correct the problem,
and what steps are being taken to prevent the problem
from recurring.
C. Such notification shall not relieve the user of any
expense, loss, damage or other liability which may be
incurred as a result of damage or loss to the District
or any other damage or loss to person or property; nor
_ shall such notification relieve the user of any fees
or other liability which may be imposed by this
Ordinance or other applicable law.
501.4 Notification of Bypass
A. Bypass of industrial wastewater to the sewer is
prohibited. The District may take enforcement action
against the user, unless:
.d
1. Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life,
personal injury, or severe property damage;
2. There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass,
such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities,
retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance
d during normal periods of equipment downtime. This
condition is not satisfied if adequate backup
equipment should have been installed in the
m exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to
prevent a bypass which occurred during normal
periods of equipment downtime or preventative
maintenance; and
3. The permittee submitted notices as required under
Article 501.4(B) .
61
B. if a permittee knows in advance of the need for a 1.r
bypass, it shall submit prior notice to the District,
if possible at least ten (10) days before the date of
the bypass.
i.
C. The District may approve an anticipated bypass after
considering its adverse effects, if the District
determines that it will meet the conditions listed in Lr
501.4 (A) (1-3) .
D. A permittee shall submit oral notice of an
unanticipated bypass that exceeds their permitted
discharge limitations, to the District, within 24
hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the
bypass. A written report shall also be provided V
within five (5) days of the time the permittee becomes
aware of the bypass. The report shall contain a
description of the bypass and its cause; the duration
of the bypass, including exact dates and times, and,
if the bypass has not been corrected, the anticipated
time it is expected to continue; and steps taken or
planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence
of the bypass. Failure to submit oral notice or
written report may be grounds for permit revocation.
E. Such notification shall not relieve the user of any W,
expense, loss, damage, or other liability which may be
incurred as a result of damage or loss to the District
or any other damage or loss to person or property; nor
shall such notification relieve the user of any fees
or other liability which may be imposed by this
Ordinance or other applicable law.
V
Ir
W
V
1N
V
62
I
4
I
V
e
ARTICLE 6
a, ENFORCEMENT
600. PURPOSE AND SCOPE
A. The Board finds that in order for the District to
comply with the laws, regulations, and rules imposed
upon it by Regulatory Agencies and to ensure that the
District's facilities and treatment processes are
protected and are able to operate with the highest
degree of efficiency, and to protect the public health
and environment, specific enforcement provisions must
be adopted to govern the discharges to the District's
system by industrial discharge permittees.
B. To ensure that all interested parties are afforded due
process of law and that non-compliance and violations
are resolved as soon as possible, the general policy
of the District is that any Probation Order,
Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) , or
Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreement (RCSA) will
be determined and made by the Division Head of the
Source Control Division, with a right of appeal by the
e pernittee to the General Manager pursuant to the
procedures set forth in Section 618. A user,
pernittee, or applicant for a permit may request the
Executive committee to hear an appeal on the General
Manager's decision pursuant to Section 619. Such
request may be granted or denied by the Executive
Committee. Any permit suspension or revocation
proposed by the Source Control Division staff will be
heard and a recommendation made to the General Manager
by a District Department Head or other person
designated by the General Manager with a right of
appeal of the General Manager's order by the permittee
to the Executive Committee pursuant to the provisions
of Section 619. Actions and decisions by the Division
Head or Department Head are made pursuant to a
delegation of authority by the General Manager as
authorized by Section 107 of this Ordinance.
® C. Non-compliance fees as specified in Tables II and III
may be revised from time to time as adopted by the
District Board of Directors.
r
m
63
e
v
N
601. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS AND APPLICABLE FEES
A. Routine sampling - Procedures
1. Routine sampling of all permittees shall be
conducted in the time, place, manner, and
frequency determined at the sole discretion of the `+
District.
2. Non-compliance with mass emission rate limits,
concentrations, permit discharge conditions,
and/or this Ordinance may be determined by an
analysis of a grab or a composite sample of the
effluent of a permittee. `±
B. Routine Sampling - Non-Compliance Fees
1. If routine sampling of the effluent of a permittee
reveals non-compliance by the permittee with the
mass emission rates or other conditions and
limitations specified in the permittee's discharge M'
permit, or with any provisions of this Ordinance,
then the permittee shall pay fees to the District
as specified in Article 6, Schedule A of Tables II y
and III. The purpose of the non-compliance fees
is to compensate the District for additional costs
of sampling, monitoring, laboratory analysis,
treatment, disposal, and administrative processing 4i
incurred as a result of the non-compliance, and
shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any
penalties as may be assessed pursuant to Sections
W
616 and 617.
2. The fees specified shall commence on the date the
sampling is started and shall continue to
accumulate for each day sampled.
ti
u
Yq
4
y
64
r
TABLE II
FEES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS
AND MASS EMISSION RATE LIMITS
r
Dollars Per Pound Per Day
r in Excess of Limit*
Schedule Schedule Schedule
ngn ugn .'C.
r
Arsenic $ 150.00 $ 300.00 $ 450.00
Cadmium 1,500.00 3,000.00 4,500.00
Chromium (Total) 150.00 300.00 450.00
Copper 150.00 300.00 450.00
Lead 120.00 240.00 360.00
Mercury 150.00 300.00 450.00
Nickel 75.00 150.00 225.00
Silver 150.00 300.00 450.00
r Zinc 75.00 150.00 225.00
Cyanide (Total) 75.00 150.00 225.00
r Cyanide (Amenable) 150.00 300.00 450.00
PCB's 10,000.00 20,000.00 30,000.00
Pesticides 10,000.00 20,000.00 30,000.00
Total Toxic Organics 150.00 300.00 450.00
Phenols 75.00 150.00 225.00
Dissolved Sulfides 75.00 150.00 225.00
+ There is an additional administration fee, adopted by the
., Board of Directors, to process each non-compliance invoice.
r
65
r
r
r
TABLE III �►'
FEES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS
AND MASS EMISSION RATE LIMITS
F+
it
Dollars Per Hundred Pounds
Per Day in Excess of Limit*
Schedule Schedule Schedule `+
np" "B" '.C"
B.O.D. $ 15.00 $ 30.00 $ 45.00 we
Suspended Solids 15.00 30.00 45.00
Oil and Grease (Animal or
Vegetable Origin) 200.00 400.00 600.00
Oil and Grease (Mineral or
Petroleum Origin) 300.00 600.00 900.00
Total Dissolved Solids 20.00 40.00 60.00 yr
Ammonia 20.00 40.00 60.00
b
Dollars Per Hour
In Excess of Limit* L
pH Range Schedule "A" Schedule "B & C"
<1.0 $ 125.00 $ 165.00
r
1.0 - 2.0 100.00 130.00
2.1 - 3.0 75.00 100.00 Lr
3.1 - 4.0 50.00 65.00 1
4.1 - 5.0 25.00 35.00 N
Hourly pH non-compliance will be determined by pH 4
recording data or grab sample(s) or hourly composite w
sample(s) .
* There is an additional administration fee, adopted by the b
Board of Directors, to process each non-compliance invoice.
�y
66
i
V
V
m 602. PROBATION ORDER
® A. Grounds
In the event the Division Read determines that a
permittee has discharged in violation of any provision
of this ordinance, or the terms, conditions and
limitations of its discharge permit, or has not made
payment of all amounts owed to the District for user
.. charges, non-compliance fees or any other fees, the
General Manager may issue a Probation Order, whereby
the permittee must comply with all directives,
conditions and requirements therein within the time
prescribed.
B. Provisions
r The issuance of a Probation Order may contain terms
and conditions including, but not limited to,
installation of pretreatment equipment and facilities,
' submittal of drawings or technical reports, payment of
fees, limits on rate and time of discharge, or other
provisions to ensure compliance with this Ordinance.
a
C. Probation Order - Non-Compliance Charges
If at any time while a Probation Order is in effect, a
permittee discharges wastewater to the District's
sewerage system which is not in compliance with the
Probation Order, the terms, conditions, or limitations
specified in the permittee's discharge permit, or with
any provision of the ordinance, then the permittee
shall pay fees to the District as specified in Article
6, Schedule B of Tables II and III of Section 601, and
the permittee may be assessed all other costs incurred
during the sampling, including labor, equipment,
materials, and overhead.
r
D. Probation Order - Permit Suspension
If at any time while a Probation Order is in effect, a
permittee discharges wastewater to the District's
sewerage system which is not in compliance with the
Probation Order, the terms, conditions or limitations
specified in the permittee's discharge permit, or with
any provision of this Ordinance, the permittee may be
subject to permit suspension pursuant to the
® provisions of Section 605 of this Ordinance.
e 67
v
r
L
E. Probation Order - Expiration w
A Probation order issued by the General Manager shall
be in effect for a period not to exceed ninety (90)
days. Upon satisfactory compliance with the terms of
the Probation Order and expiration thereof, any fees
to be assessed due to subsequent non-compliance by
Permittee shall be in accordance with this ordinance, Ir
re-established at the rate set forth in Article 6,
Schedule A of Tables II and III. All enforcement
actions thereafter shall be based on applicable
provisions of this Ordinance.
603. ENFORCEMENT COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE AGREEMENT (ECSA) y
A. Grounds
L
Upon determination that a permittee is in
non-compliance with the terms, conditions or
limitations specified in its permit or any provision
of this Ordinance, and needs to construct and/or
acquire and install equipment related to pretreatment,
the General Manager may require the permittee to enter
into an ECSA which will, upon the effective date of y
the ECSA, amend the permittee's permit. The ECSA
shall contain the terms and conditions by which a
permittee must operate during its term and shall
provide specific dates for achieving compliance with
each term and condition for construction and/or
acquisition and installation of required equipment
related to pretreatment. L
An ECSA shall have a maximum term of one hundred-
eighty (180) days, and upon showing of good cause,
including but not limited to reasonable progress under
the terms of the ECSA, it may be extended by the
General Manager for an additional period not to exceed
one hundred-eighty (180) days. No further extensions Eft
shall be granted except upon approval of the Boards of
Directors.
i
B. Provisions 6'
The issuance of an ECSA may contain terms and
conditions including but not limited to requirements r
for self-monitoring, installation of pretreatment
equipment and facilities, submittal of drawings or
reports, operator certification, audit of waste
minimization practices, payment of fees, limits on
rate and time of discharge, deposit of performance
68 r
y
guarantee, or other provisions to ensure compliance
with this Ordinance.
... C. ECSA - Payment of Amounts Owed
An ECSA shall not be approved by the District until
such time as all amounts owed to the District,
including user fees, non-compliance fees, deposits, or
civil penalties are paid in full, or an agreement for
deferred payment secured by collateral or a third
party, is approved by the District. Failure to pay
all amounts owed to the District shall be grounds for
permit suspension or permit revocation as set forth in
Section 605 and 606.
D. ECSA - Non-Compliance Charges
If, during the term of an ECSA, sampling reveals
non-compliance by the permittee with the terms,
conditions or limitations specified in the ECSA,
user's permit, or any provision of this Ordinance, the
permittee shall pay the fees as specified in Article
6, Schedule B of Tables II and III, and may be
assessed all other costs incurred during the sampling,
including labor, equipment, materials, and overhead.
E. ECSA - Permit Suspension/Revocation
r
IP compliance is not achieved in accordance with the
terms and conditions of an ECSA during its term, the
General Manager may issue an order suspending or
revoking the discharge permit pursuant to Section 605
or 606 of this Ordinance.
F. ECSA - Expiration
If, following the expiration of an ECSA, sampling
reveals non-compliance by the permittee with the
terms, conditions or limitations specified in the
permit, or any provisions of this ordinance, the
permittee shall pay an amount based on the fees set
a forth in Article 6, Schedule B of Tables II and III
for each violation.
If the permittee remains in consistent compliance for
a two-year period following ECSA expiration, then fees
shall be re-established in accordance with Article 6,
Schedule A, Tables II and III. All enforcement
.. actions thereafter shall be based on applicable
provisions of this ordinance.
r
69
l�
604. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE AGREEMENT (RCSA) L
A. Grounds
If at any time subsequent to the issuance of a wastewater
discharge permit to an industrial user, Federal
Categorical Pretreatment Standards are adopted or revised
by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, or 110
in the event the District enacts revised discharge
limitations, the General Manager, upon determination that
an industrial user would not be in compliance with the �.
future limitations, may require the industrial user to
enter into a RCSA with the District under terms and
conditions that would provide for achieving compliance
with all new standards by the industrial user on a r'
specific date. The RCSA shall have a maximum term of two
hundred-seventy (270) days.
i
Yr
B. Provisions
The issuance of a RCSA may contain terms and conditions
including but not limited to requirements for installation
of pretreatment equipment and facilities, submittal of
drawings or reports, waste minimization practices or other
provisions to ensure compliance with this Ordinance.
C. RCSA - Non-Compliance Charges
I
During the period said RCSA is in effect, any discharge by r
permittee in violation of the RCSA will require payment of
non-compliance fees in accordance with Article 6, Schedule j
A of Tables II and III. L
D. RCSA - Expiration
Upon RCSA expiration, and in the event of non-compliance
by permittee, non-compliance fees shall be established in
accordance with Article 6, Schedule A of Tables II and
III. All enforcement actions thereafter shall be based on
applicable provisions of this ordinance.
605. PERMIT SUSPENSION L
A. Grounds
The General Manager may suspend any permit when it is
determined that a permittee:
1. Fails to comply with the terms and conditions of Lr
either an ECSA or RCSA;
i
V
70
Ir
64
m
2. Knowingly provides a false statement,
representation, record, report, or other document
to the District;
A
3. Refuses to provide records, reports, plans, or
other documents required by the District to
determine permit terms, conditions, or
limitations, discharge compliance, or compliance
with this Ordinance;
m 4. Falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders
inaccurate any monitoring device or sample
collection method;
m S. Fails to report significant changes in operations
or wastewater constituents and characteristics;
- 6. Violated a Probation Order;
7. Refuses reasonable access to the permittee's
w premises for the purpose of inspection and
monitoring;
8. Does not make timely payment of all amounts owed
.r to the District for user charges, non-compliance
fees, or any other fees;
9. Discharges batch dumps to the District's sewerage
system;
10. Violates any condition or limitation of its
discharge permit or any provision of the
District's Ordinance.
B. Notice/Hearing
When the General Manager has reason to believe that
grounds exist for permit suspension, he shall give
m written notice thereof by certified mail to the
permittee setting forth a statement of the facts and
grounds deemed to exist, together with the time and
,d place where the charges shall be heard by the General
Manager's designee. The hearing date shall be not
less than fifteen (15) calendar days nor more than
forty-five (45) calendar days after the mailing of
such notice.
1. At the suspension hearing, the permittee shall
,b have an opportunity to respond to the allegations
set forth in the notice by presenting written or
oral evidence. The hearing shall be conducted in
accordance with procedures established by the
71
m
r
L
General Manager and approved by the District's �+
General Counsel.
2. After the conclusion of the hearing, the General
Manager's designee shall submit a written report
to the General Manager setting forth a brief
statement of facts found to be true, a j
determination of the issues presented,
conclusions, and a recommendation.
Upon receipt of the written report, the General V,
Manager shall make his determination and should he
find that grounds exist for suspension of the
permit, he shall issue his decision and order in
writing within thirty (30) calendar days after the
conclusion of the hearing by his designee. The
written decision and order of the General Manager
shall be sent by certified mail to the permittee W
or its legal counsel/representative at the
permittee's business address.
C. Effect
1. Upon an order of suspension by the General Manager
becoming final, the permittee shall have no right
to discharge any industrial wastewater, directly W
or indirectly to the District's system for the
duration of the suspension. All costs for
physically terminating and reinstating service
shall be paid by the permittee.
2. Any owner or responsible management employee of
the permittee shall be bound by the order of
suspension.
3. An order of permit suspension issued by the L
General Manager shall be deemed final upon
delivery to the permittee, unless appealed to the '
Executive Committee pursuant to Section 619. it
606. PERMIT REVOCATION L
A. Grounds
The General Manager may revoke any permit when it is it
determined that a permittee:
1. Knowingly provides a false statement, V
representation, record, report, or other document
to the District;
L
72
r
2. Refuses to provide records, reports, plans, or
other documents required by the District to
determine permit terms, conditions, or
limitations, discharge compliance, or compliance
with this Ordinance;
3. Falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders
inaccurate any monitoring device or sample
collection method;
4. Fails to report significant changes in operations
or wastewater constituents and characteristics;
5. Fails to comply with the terms and conditions of
an ECSA, permit suspension, or probation order;
6. Discharges effluent to the District's sewerage
system while its permit is suspended;
7. Refuses reasonable access to the permittee's
premises for the purpose of inspection and
monitoring;
8. Does not make timely payment of all amounts owed
to the District for user charges, non-compliance
fees, or any other fees;
9. Discharges a batch dump to the District's sewerage
system;
10. Discharges effluent that causes pass through or
interference with the Districts' collection,
treatment, or disposal system;
11. Fails to submit oral notice or written report of
bypass occurrence;
12. Violates any condition or limitation of its
discharge permit or any provision of the
District's Ordinance;
B. Notice/Hearin
When the General Manager has reason to believe that
grounds exist for the revocation of a permit, he shall
`a give written notice by certified mail thereof to the
permittee setting forth a statement of the facts and
grounds deemed to exist together with the time and
place where the charges shall be heard by the General
Manager's designee. The hearing date shall be not
less than fifteen (15) calendar days nor more than
d
73
m
w
forty-five (45) calendar days after the mailing of W
such notice.
1. At the hearing, the permittee shall have an
opportunity to respond to the allegations set
forth in the notice by presenting written or oral
evidence. The revocation hearing shall be l
conducted in accordance with the procedures
established by the General Manager and approved by
the District's General Counsel.
2. After the conclusion of the hearing, the General V
Manager's designee shall submit a written report
to the General Manager setting forth a brief
statement of facts found to be true, a W
determination of the issues presented,
conclusions, and a recommendation.
y
Upon receipt of the written report, the General
Manager shall make his determination and should he
find that grounds exist for permanent revocation
of the permit, he shall issue his decision and
order in writing within thirty (30) calendar days
after the conclusion of the hearing by his
designee. The written decision and order of the
General Manager shall be sent by certified mail to
the permittee or its legal counsel/representative
at the permittee's business address.
v
In the event the General Manager determines to not
revoke the permit, he may order other enforcement
actions, including, but not limited to, a L
temporary suspension of the permit, under terms
and conditions that he deems appropriate.
C. Effect V
1. Upon an order of revocation by the General Manager
becoming final, the permittee shall permanently u
lose all rights to discharge any industrial
wastewater directly or indirectly to the
District's system. All costs for physical LW
shall be paid by the permittee.
2. Any owner or responsible management employee of
the permittee shall be bound by the order of `e
revocation.
3. Any future application for a permit at any
location within the District by any person subject
to an order of revocation will be considered by
the District after fully reviewing the records of
L,
74
L
►I
r
the revoked permit, which records may be the basis
for denial of a new permit.
r 4. An order of permit revocation issued by the
General Manager shall be deemed final upon
delivery to the permittee, unless appealed to the
r Executive Committee pursuant to Section 619.
607. WASTEHAULER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS
r
A wastehauler's non-compliance with permit requirements
shall be determined by an analysis of a sample of the
discharge for any constituent or conditions specified in
r the wastehauler's discharge permit. If the discharge of a
wastehauler is found by the analysis to be in excess of
the concentrations specified in the wastehauler's
discharge permit, the wastehauler shall, after receiving a
demand from the District, identify in writing, all sources
of the discharge.
r If it can be proven to the satisfaction of the General
Manager that the discharge is of septic tank/cesspool or
non-industrial origin, then the District may elect not to
r accept waste from that particular source.
If the discharge is from an industrial source(s) and
exceeds permit limits, the following shall apply:
A. First Violation
1. Permittee shall pay a non-compliance fee of Five
Hundred Dollars ($500. 00) .
2. The wastehauler permit for disposal privileges
shall be suspended for five (5) days.
S. Second Violation
1. The permittee shall pay a non-compliance fee of
One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) .
r
2. The wastehauler permit for disposal privileges
shall be suspended for ten (10) days.
3. The wastehauler permit may be revoked in
accordance with Section 606.
r
75
6.
608. DAMAGE TO FACILITIES OR INTERRUPTION OF NORMAL OPERATIONS L
ER
A. When a discharge of wastes causes an obstruction,
interference, damage, or any other impairment to the
District's facilities or to the operation of those
facilities, the District may assess the costs against
the discharger for the work required to clean or
repair the facility together with expenses incurred to
resume normal operations, and shall be grounds for
permit revocation. A service charge of twenty-five
percent (25%) of District's costs shall be added to
the costs and charges to reimburse the District for
miscellaneous overhead, including administrative
personnel and record keeping. The total amount shall it
be payable within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by
the District.
B. If it can be shown that the discharge is the cause of
the District violating its discharge requirements
established by any Regulatory Agency or incurring
additional expenses or suffering losses or damage to V
the facilities, then that discharger shall be
responsible for any costs or expenses incurred by the
District, including regulatory fines, penalties, and
assessments made by other agencies or a court.
609. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PASS THROUGH
If an industrial waste discharge results in a pass through
event affecting the District or its facilities, all costs L
associated with the event, including treatment costs,
regulatory fines, penalties, assessments, and other
indirect costs shall be levied against the discharger.
Furthermore, the discharger shall submit to the District 'r
plans to prevent future recurrences to the satisfaction of
the District. A second occurrence shall be grounds for
permit revocation.
610. BATCH DUMPS L
When the District determines that a user has discharged
concentrated pollutants to the sewerage system in a manner i ,
or method that is not approved by the District, 6,
non-compliance fees shall be assessed as set forth in
Article 6, Schedule C in Tables II and III. In addition,
the user may be subject to permit suspension or permit L
revocation in accordance with Sections 605 and 606 as well
as additional legal enforcement remedies available to the
District. I .
L.
76
L
LI
611. PUBLISHED NOTICES
In accordance with the requirements of Federal Law, the
District shall annually cause to be published the names of
all industrial users in significant non-compliance. Upon
a minimum of a thirty (30) -day notification to the
permittee, said publication shall be in the newspaper of
the largest daily circulation published in the District's
service area.
r 612. PUBLIC NUISANCE
Discharge of wastewater in any manner in violation of this
Ordinance or of any order issued by the General Manager,
as authorized by this ordinance, is hereby declared a
public nuisance and shall be corrected or abated as
directed by the General Manager. Any person creating a
,r public nuisance is guilty of a misdemeanor.
613. TERMINATION OF SERVICE
m
The District, by order of the General Manager, may
physically terminate sewerage service to any property as a
term of any order of suspension or revocation of a permit.
All costs for physical termination shall be paid by the
permittee as well as all costs for reinstating service.
614. EMERGENCY SUSPENSION
The District may, by order of the General Manager, suspend
sewerage service or wastehauler discharge service when
such suspension is necessary, in order to stop an actual
or impending discharge which presents or may present an
imminent or substantial endangerment to the health and
welfare of persons, or to the environment, or may cause
interference to the District's sewerage facilities, or may
,d cause the District to violate any State or Federal Law or
Regulation. An Emergency Suspension order is final and
not appealable.
v
615. INJUNCTION
r Whenever a discharger of wastewater is in violation of or
may potentially violate the provisions of this Ordinance,
the discharger's permit conditions, or any Federal
Pretreatment Standards or Requirements for dischargers, as
Ytl
77
6d
set forth in 40 CPR Section 403.8 at seq. , or fails to L►
submit required reports or refuses to allow the Districts
entry to inspect the premises, the District may petition
the Superior Court for the issuance of a preliminary or
permanent injunction, or both, as may be appropriate to
restrain the continued violation or to prevent violations
by the discharger. L
616. CIVIL PENALTIES I
A. Authority L
All users of the District's system and facilities are j
subject to enforcement actions administratively or Lr
judicially by the District, U.S. EPA, State of
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, or
the County of orange District Attorney. Said actions L.
may be taken pursuant to the authority and provisions
of several laws, including but not limited to: (1)
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as L
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. Section 1251 at
seg.) ; (2) California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act
(California Water Code Section 13000 et seq.) ; (3)
California Hazardous Waste Control Law (California L
Health & Safety Code Sections 25100 to 25250) ; and (4)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (42
U.S.C.A Section 6901 at seq. ) . L
B. Recovery of Fines or Penalties
i
In the event District is subject to the payment of L
fines or penalties pursuant to the legal authority and
actions of other regulatory or enforcement agencies
based on a violation of law or regulation or its L
permits, and said violation can be established by
District, as caused by the discharge of any user of
the District's system which is in violation of any
provision of the District's Ordinance or the user's L
permit, District shall be entitled to recover from the
user all costs and expenses, including, but not L
limited to, the full amount of said fines or penalties
to which it has been subjected.
C. Ordinance
L
Pursuant to the authority of California Government
Code Sections 54739 - 54740, any person who violates ,
any provision of this Ordinance; any permit condition, L
prohibition or effluent limitation; or any suspension
or revocation order shall be liable civilly for a
penalty not to exceed $6,000.00 for each day in which li
v
78
L
V
such violation occurs. The General Counsel of the
District, upon order of the General Manager, shall
petition the Superior Court to impose, assess, and
recover such penalties.
617. CRIMINAL PENALTIES
Any person who violates any provision of this Ordinance is
guilty of a misdemeanor, which upon conviction is
.d punishable by a fine not to exceed $1, 000.00, or
imprisonment for not more than thirty (30) days, or both.
Each violation may constitute a new and separate violation
and shall be subject to the penalties contained herein.
618. APPEALS TO GENERAL MANAGER
w
A. General
Any user, permit applicant or permittee affected by
any decision, action or determination made by the
Division Head may file with the General Manager a
written request for an appeal hearing. The request
d must be made within fifteen (15) days of mailing of
the staffs original decision. The request for
hearing shall set forth in detail all facts supporting
W the appellant-s request.
B. Notice
�+ The General Manager shall, within fifteen (15) days of
receiving the request for appeal, and pursuant to
Section 107, designate a Department Head or other
d person to hear the appeal and provide written notice
to the user of the hearing date, time and place. The
hearing date shall not be more than thirty (30) days
from the mailing of such notice by certified mail to
the appellant unless a later date is agreed to by the
appellant. If the hearing is not held within said
time due to actions or inactions of the appellant,
!, then the staff decision shall be deemed final.
C. Hearing
At the hearing, the appellant shall have the
opportunity to present information supporting its
position concerning the staff's original decision,
action or determination. The hearing shall be
conducted in accordance with procedures established by
the General Manager and approved by the District's
General counsel.
79
w
Y/
Id
D. Written Determination
After the conclusion of the hearing, the Department
Head shall submit a written report to the General
Manager setting forth a brief statement of facts found
to be true, a determination of the issues presented,
conclusions, and a recommendation whether to uphold, `+
modify or reverse the staff's original decision,
action or determination. Upon receipt of the written
report, the General Manager shall make his `,
determination and shall issue his decision and order
within thirty (30) calendar days of the hearing by his
designee. The written decision and order of the
General Manager shall be sent by certified mail to the
appellant or its legal counsel/representative at the
appellant's business address.
b
The order of the General Manager shall be final in all
respects fifteen (15) days after it is mailed to the
appellant unless a request for hearing is filed with
the Executive Committee pursuant to Section 619.
619. APPEALS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
A. General
If the General Manager's order is adverse to the user,
permit applicant, or permittee, it may, prior to the
date that the General Manager's order becomes final,
file a written request for hearing to the Executive L
Committee of the Joint Boards of Directors accompanied
by an appeal fee in an amount established by a
separate resolution of the District's Board of
Directors. The request for hearing shall set forth in
detail all the issues in dispute for which the
appellant seeks determination and all facts supporting
appellant's request. Id
No later than sixty (60) days after receipt of the
request for hearing, the Executive Committee shall v
either set the matter for a hearing, or deny the
request for a hearing.
The Executive Committee shall grant all requests for a V
hearing on appeals concerning permit suspension or
revocation. Whether to grant or deny the request for
a hearing on appeals of other final decisions of the V
General Manager shall be the sole discretion of the
Executive Committee.
Ir
so
W
r The appeal fee shall be refunded if the Executive
Committee denies a hearing or reverses or modifies the
order of the General Manager. The fee is not refunded
r if the Executive Committee denies the appeal.
A hearing shall be held by the Executive Committee
within sixty-five (65) days from the date of
determination granting a hearing, unless a later date
is agreed to by the permittee and the Executive
Committee. If the matter is not heard within the
required time, due to actions or inactions of the
appellant, the General Manager's order shall be deemed
final.
r
B. Notice
The Board Secretary shall, within fifteen (15) days of
the Executive Committee's determination, provide
written notice to the appellant by certified mail of
the hearing date, time, and place, or the denial. If
a hearing is denied, the General Manager's decision
shall be final fifteen (15) days after the date such
notice is mailed.
C. Hearing
Except as provided hereafter in Section 619.1, all
r matters of appeal by a permittee under this Section
shall be referred to the Executive Committee. A
member of the Executive Committee may designate
another member or alternate member of the Governing
Board of the same District that the Executive
Committee member represents to serve in the member's
place for purposes of hearing and deciding an appeal
pursuant to this Section. The term Executive
Committee shall thereafter mean the Executive
Committee as modified.
At the hearing, the appellant shall have the
opportunity to present written or oral evidence
supporting its position concerning the original
decision, action or determination, in accordance with
adopted Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Directors.
r
D. Written Determination
After the hearing, the Executive Committee shall make
a determination whether to uphold, modify, or reverse
r the staff's original decision, action, or
determination as ordered by the General Manager.
r
81
r
r
i
u
The decision of the Executive Committee shall be set v
forth in writing within sixty-five (65) days after the
close of the hearing and shall contain a finding of
the facts found to be true, the determination of
issues presented, and the conclusions. The written
decision and order of the Executive Committee shall be
sent by certified mail to the appellant or its legal
counsel/representative at the appellant's business
address.
The order of the Executive Committee shall be final L,
upon its adoption. In the event the Executive
Committee fails to reverse or modify the General
Manager's order, it shall be deemed affirmed.
619.1 Appeal of Charges and Fees
Any user, permit applicant, or permittee affected by any
decision, action, or determination by the District staff,
relating to fiscal issues of the District in which the
user, applicant, or permittee is located, including but
not limited to the imposition and collection of fees, such 6W
as connection charges, sewer use charges, special purpose
discharge use charges and wastehauler fees, but excluding
non-compliance fees set forth in Article 6, may file an v
appeal which shall be heard by the Board of Directors of
the District in which the appellant's property is located.
All appeals under this Section 619.1 shall be conducted by
the Board of Directors in the same manner and under the
same rules as appeals to the Executive Committee set forth L
in Section 619 A through D, inclusive, above.
620. PAYMENT OF CHARGES
A. Except as otherwise provided, all fees, charges and
penalties established by this Ordinance are due and
payable upon receipt of notice thereof. All such Ir
amounts are delinquent if unpaid forty-five (45) days
after date of invoice.
B. Any charge that becomes delinquent shall have added to L
it a penalty in accordance with the following:
i
1. Forty-six (46) days after date of invoice, a 6+
penalty of ten percent (10%) of the base invoice
amount, not to exceed a maximum of $1,000.00.
2. Ninety (90) days after data of invoice, a total
penalty of ten percent (10%) of the base invoice
amount, not to exceed a maximum of $4, 000.00. L
82
V
y
C. Any invoice outstanding and unpaid after ninety (90)
days shall be cause for immediate initiation of permit
.. revocation proceedings or immediate suspension of the
permit.
D. Penalties charged under this Section shall not accrue
to those invoices successfully appealed, provided the
District receives written notification of said appeal .
prior to the payment due date.
r
E. Payment of disputed charges is still required by the
due date during District review of any appeal
submitted by permittees.
621. COLLECTION
... Collection of delinquent accounts shall be in accordance
with the District's policy resolution establishing
procedures for collection of delinquent obligations owed
to the District, as amended from time to time by the Board
of Directors. Any such action for collection may include
an application for an injunction to prevent repeated and
^ recurring violations of this ordinance.
622. RECOVERY OF COSTS INCURRED BY DISTRICT
In the event permittee fails to comply with any of the
terms and conditions of the District's Ordinance, a
probationary order, a permit suspension or revocation, an
ECSA or a permit issued hereunder, the District shall be
entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs which may
be incurred in order to enforce any of said terms and
conditions, with or without filing proceedings in court.
623. FINANCIAL SECURITY/AMENDMENTS TO PERMIT
A. Compliance Deposit
Permittees that have been subject to enforcement
and/or collection proceedings may be required to
deposit with the District an amount determined by the
General Manager as necessary to guarantee payment to
District of all charges, fees, penalties, costs and
expenses that may be incurred in the future, before
permission is granted for further discharge to the
sewer.
83
V
B. Delincuent Accounts r'
The District may require an amendment to the permit of
any permittee who fails to make payment in full of all `,
fees and charges assessed by the District, including
reconciliation amounts, delinquency penalties, and
other costs or fees incurred by Permittee.
u
C. Bankruptcy
Every Permittee filing any legal action in any courtV
of competent jurisdiction, including the United States
Bankruptcy Court, for purposes of discharging its
financial debts or obligations or seeking
court-ordered, protection from its creditors, shall, W
within ten (10) days of filing such action, apply for
and obtain the issuance of an amendment to the permit
by the District.
D. Permit Amendments
The District shall review and examine Permittee's
account to determine whether previously incurred fees
and charges have been paid in accordance with time
requirements prescribed by this Ordinance. District r,
may thereafter issue an amendment to the User's permit
in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 and
Section 623(E) of this Ordinance.
E. Security
An amendment to a waste discharge permit issued
pursuant to Sections 623 (B) , (C) , and (D) , may be
conditioned upon the Permittee depositing financial
security in an amount equal to the average total fees J
and charges for two (2) calendar quarters during the
preceding year. Said deposit shall be used to
guarantee payment of all fees and charges incurred for
future services and facilities furnished by District
and shall not be used by the District to recover
outstanding fees and charges incurred prior to the
Permittee filing and receiving protection from
creditors in the United States Bankruptcy Court. W
F. Return of Security
u
In the event the Permittee makes payment in full
within the time prescribed by this Ordinance of all
fees and charges incurred over a period of two (2)
years following the issuance of an amendment to the W
permit pursuant to Sections 623 (B) , (C) , and (D) , the
W
84
W
W
r
`r District shall either return the security deposit
posted by the Permittee or credit their account.
r 624. JUDICIAL REVIEW
a..
A. Purpose and Effect
Pursuant to Section 1094.6 of the California Code of
Civil Procedure, the District hereby enacts this part
to limit to ninety (90) days following final decisions
in adjudicatory administrative hearings the time
within which an action can be brought to review such
decisions by means of administrative mandamus.
B. Definitions
r As used in this Section, the following terms and words
shall have the following meanings:
1. Decision shall mean and include adjudicatory
" administrative decisions that are made after
hearing, or after revoking, suspending, or denying
an application for a permit or a license;
r
2. Complete Record shall mean and include the
transcript of the proceedings, all pleadings, all
notices and orders, any proposed decision by the
General Manager, the final decision, all admitted
exhibits, all rejected exhibits in the possession
of the District or its offices or agents, all
written evidence, and any other papers in the
case;
e. 3. Party shall mean a person whose permit has been
denied, suspended, or revoked.
C. Time Limit for Judicial Review
r
Judicial review of any decision of the District or its
officer or agent may be made pursuant to Section
m 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure only if the
petition for writ of mandate is filed not later than
the ninetieth (90th) day following the date on which
the decision becomes final. If there is no provision
for reconsideration in the procedures governing the
proceedings, the decision is final on the date it is
made. If there is provision for reconsideration, the
decision is final upon the expiration of the period
during which such reconsideration can be sought;
provided that if reconsideration is sought pursuant to
such provision the decision is final for the purposes
85
it
b
of this Section on the date that reconsideration is
rejected.
D. Preparation of the Record
V
The complete record of the proceedings shall be
prepared by the District officer or agent who made the
decision and shall be delivered to the petitioner �+
within ninety (90) days after he has filed written
request therefor. The District may recover from the
petitioner its actual costs for transcribing or
otherwise preparing the record.
E. Extension -
r
If the petitioner files a request for the record
within ten (10) days after the date the decision
becomes final, the time within which a petition,
pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, may be filed shall be extended to not later
than the thirtieth (30th) day following the date on
.which the record is either personally delivered or
mailed to the petitioner or the petitioner's attorney
of record, if appropriate.
u
F. Notice
In making a final decision, the District shall provide
notice to the party that the time within which r
judicial review must be sought is governed by Section
1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
V
r
r
Ir
V
bl
r
86
V
r
ARTICLE 7
m
CONNECTION PERMITS/CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
701. INTRODUCTION - ALL DISTRICTS
d
A. Connection permits may be required of dwelling units,
buildings and developments connecting directly or
indirectly to District's sewerage facilities.
Included are the connections of laterals to local
municipal sewerage facilities and the connection of
local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to
District's facilities.
B. No permit shall be valid unless the real property to
be served by use of the permit is included within the
boundaries of the District and within the boundaries
of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain
public sewering facilities. However, a permit may be
,., issued for property to be served outside the
boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local
sewering agency makes application for the issuance of
such permit.
C. Except as may be provided by an individual District,
there will be no capital facilities connection charges
assessed to local government agencies for connecting
directly or indirectly to District's sewerage
facilities; however, a connection permit must be
obtained.
D. Payment of capital facilities connection charges for
connection to District's sewerage facilities shall be
r required at the time of issuance of the building
permit for all construction within the District,
excepting in the case of a building legally exempt
from the requirement of obtaining a building permit.
The payment of the sewer capital facilities connection
charge for such buildings will be required at the time
of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection
d permit for any construction within the territorial
limits of the District.
E. A schedule of charges specified herein will be on file
in the office of the Secretary of the District and in
the Building Department of each City within the
District.
r 87
W
W
702. DISTRICT NO. 1 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
A. District Connection Permit Recuired W
No application for a permit for a connection to a District
sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which `+
discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be
considered until a District capital facilities connection
charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit V
shall be issued unless there is an established use of the
property to be served or a valid building permit issued
which establishes the use of said property.
r
B. District Connection Charoe Amounts
(1) Capital facilities connection charge for new ,
construction, dwelling buildings:
For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per
dwelling unit.
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing W
dwelling buildings:
For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the
capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500
per dwelling unit.
i
(3) Capital facilities connection charge for new W
construction and existing structures, other than
dwelling buildings:
For all other new construction, including, but not
limited to, commercial and industrial buildings,
hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 �r
square feet of floor area contained within such
construction, provided that the minimum capital
facilities connection charge for such new construction
shall be $1,500.
(4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement
buildings: u
For new construction replacing former buildings, the
capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs
(A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction
is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or
W
88
V
W
destruction of the former building, a credit against
such charge shall be allowed and shall be the
equivalent capital facilities connection charge for
^d the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated
on the basis of current charges for new construction.
In no case shall such credit exceed the capital
facilities connection charges.
(5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or
alterations of existing buildings:
In the case of structures where further new
construction or alteration is made to increase the
,p occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of
buildings to be used for other than family dwelling
buildings, the capital facilities connection charge
shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or
created, and, in the case of new construction other
than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per
1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained
within such new construction, provided such new
construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture
units.
89
I
V
702. DISTRICT NO, 2 CAPITAL FACILITUS CONNECTION CHARGES V
A. District Connection Permit Reguired
No application for a permit for a connection to a District y
sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which
discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be
considered until a District capital facilities connection �+
charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit
shall be issued unless there is an established use of the
property to be served or a valid building permit issued ,r
which establishes the use of said property.
S. District Connection Charge Amounts
(1) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction, dwelling buildings:
For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital 6d
facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per
dwelling unit.
L.
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing
dwelling buildings:
V
For the connection of each existing dwelling building,
the capital facilities connection charge shall be
$1,500 per dwelling unit. '
r
(3) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction and existing structures, other than i .
dwelling buildings: L,
For all other new construction, including, but not
limited to, commercial and industrial buildings,
hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1, 000
square feet of floor area contained within such
construction, provided that the minimum capital it
facilities connection charge for such new construction
shall be $1,500.
(4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement r
buildings:
For new construction replacing former buildings, the iJ
capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs
(A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction
is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or
destruction of the former building, a credit against
such charge shall be allowed and shall be the
u
90
V
v
m equivalent capital facilities connection charge for
the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated
on the basis of current charges for new construction.
In no case shall such credit exceed the capital
facilities connection charges.
(5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or
alterations of existing buildings:
In the case of structures where further new
construction or alteration is made to increase the
occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of
buildings to be used for other than dwelling
buildings, the capital facilities connection charge
shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or
created, and, in the case of new construction other
than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per
1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained
within such new construction, provided such new
construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture
units.
r
w
91
702. DISTRICT NO. 3 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
A. District Connection Permit Reouired Lr
No application for a permit for a connection to a District
sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which it
discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be
considered until a District capital facilities connection
charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit
shall be issued unless there is an established use of the V
property to be served or a valid building permit issued
which establishes the use of said property.
y
B. District Connection Charge Amounts
(1) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction dwelling buildings:
For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per V
dwelling unit.
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing y
dwelling buildings:
For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the L
capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500
per dwelling unit.
(3) Capital facilities connection charge for new y
construction and existing structures, other than
dwelling buildings:
For all other new construction, including, but not V
limited to, commercial and industrial buildings,
hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1, 000 ri
square feet of floor area contained within such
construction, provided that the minimum capital
facilities connection charge for such new construction
shall be $1,500.
(4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement
buildings:
For new construction replacing former buildings, the
capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs
(A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction
is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or
u
92
V
destruction of the former building, a credit against
such charge shall be allowed and shall be the
equivalent capital facilities connection charge for
the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated
on the basis of current charges for new construction.
In no case shall such credit exceed the capital
,d facilities connection charges.
(5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or
alterations of existing buildings:
In the case of structures where further new
construction or alteration is made to increase the
r occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of
buildings to be used for other than dwelling
buildings, the capital facilities connection charge
shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or
i° created, and, in the case of new construction other
than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per
1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained
within such new construction, provided such new
construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture
units.
r
r
r
93
r
r
702 DTSTRICS' NO. 5 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
A. District Connection Permit Recuired V
No application for a permit for a connection to a District
sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which
discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be r
considered until a District capital facilities connection
charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit
shall be issued unless there is an established use of the r
property to be served or a valid building permit issued
which establishes the use of said property.
B. District Connection Charae Amounts
(1) Capital facilities connection charges for new ,
construction, dwelling buildings:
For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital
facilities connection charges shall be $1,500 per
dwelling unit. 6+
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing
dwelling buildings: `,
For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the
capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 �L
per dwelling unit.
(3) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction and existing structures, other than 6W
dwelling units:
For all other new construction, including, but not
limited to, commercial and industrial buildings,
hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital
facilities connection charges shall be $300 per 1,000
square feet of floor area contained within such �r
construction, provided that the minimum capital
facilities connection charge for such new construction
shall be $1,500. y
(4) Capital facilities connection charges for replacement
buildings:
r
For new construction replacing former buildings, the
capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs
(A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction
is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or
destruction of the former building, a credit against
W
94
V
r
such charge shall be allowed, calculated on the basis
of the current capital facilities connection charge
applicable for the new construction of the building
demolished or destroyed. In no case shall such credit
exceed the capital facilities connection charge.
W (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or
alterations of existing buildings:
In the case of structures where further new
Otl construction or alteration is made to increase the
occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of
buildings to be used for other than dwelling
buildings, . the capital facilities connection charge
shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in
paragraphs (A) and (C) above for each dwelling unit
added or created or each 1,000 square feet of
additional floor area contained within such new
construction, provided that new construction shall
contain additional plumbing fixture units.
r
(6) Payment of capital facilities connection charges shall
be required at the time of issuance of the building
permit for all construction within the District,
excepting in the case of a building legally exempt
from the requirement of obtaining a building permit in
the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the capital
�+ facilities connection charge for such exempt buildings
will be required at the time of, or prior to, the
issuance of a plumbing connection permit for any
construction within the District.
W
d
W
95
V
Yam'
702. DISTRICT NO. 6 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
A. District Connection Permit Required V
No application for a permit for a connection to a District
sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which
discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be it
considered until a District capital facilities connection
charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit
shall be issued unless there is an established use of the
property to be served or a valid building permit issued
which establishes the use of said property.
H. District Connection Charge Amounts .
(1) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction, dwelling buildings:
For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per
dwelling unit. b
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing
dwelling buildings:
For the connection of each existing dwelling building,
the capital facilities connection charge shall be
$1,500 per dwelling unit. 6
(3) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction and existing structures, other than
dwelling buildings:
For all other new construction, including, but not
limited to, commercial and industrial buildings,
hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000
square feet of floor area contained within such u
construction, provided that the minimum capital
facilities connection charge for such new
construction shall be $1,500. V
(4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement
buildings:
For new construction replacing former buildings, the
capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs
(A) and(C) above. If such replacement construction is
commenced within two (2) years after demolition or
destruction of the former building, a credit against
Ir
96
u
r
such charge shall be allowed and shall be the
equivalent capital facilities connection charge for
the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated
on the basis of current charges for new construction.
In no case shall such credit exceed the capital
facilities connection charges.
r
(5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or
alterations of buildings:
Otl In the case of structures where further new
construction or alteration is made to increase the
occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of
buildings to be used for other than family dwelling
buildings, the capital facilities connection charge
shall be $1,500 for dwelling unit added or created,
and, in the case of new construction other than family
dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per 1,000 square
feet of additional floor area contained within such
new construction, provided such new construction shall
,r contain additional plumbing fixture units.
r
r
r
r
W
r
r
97
y
u
702 DISTRICT NO 7 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
r
A. District Connection Permit Reauired
No application for a permit for a connection to a District y
sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which
discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be
considered until a District capital facilities connection L.
charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit
shall be issued unless there is an established use of the
property to be served or a valid building permit issued
which establishes the use of said property. it
B. District Connection Charge Amounts
(1) Capital facilities connection charge for new u
construction, dwelling buildings:
For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital Ir
facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per
dwelling unit.
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing u
dwelling buildings:
i
For the connection of each existing dwelling building, u
the capital facilities connection charge shall be
$1,500 per dwelling unit.
(3) Capital facilities connection charge for new y
construction and existing structures, other than
dwelling buildings:
r
For all other new construction, including but not
limited to, commercial and industrial buildings,
hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital ;r
facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000
square feet of floor area contained within such
construction, provided that the minimum capital y facilities connection charge for such new construction
shall be $1,500.
(4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement
buildings:
For new construction replacing former buildings, the
capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in
paragraphs(A) and (C) above. If such replacement
it
98
r
construction is commenced within two (2) years after
demolition or destruction of the former building, a
credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall
m be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge
for the building being demolished or destroyed,
calculated on the basis of current charges for new
construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the
capital facilities connection charges.
(5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or
alterations of existing buildings:
In the case of structures where further new
construction or alteration is made to increase the
occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of
buildings to be used for other than dwelling
buildings, the capital facilities connection charge
shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or
created, and, in the case of new construction other
than dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per 1,000
,e square feet of additional floor area contained within
such new construction, provided such new construction
shall contain additional plumbing fixture units.
(6) Trunk capital facilities connection charge,
residential uses:
Family dwelling unit: $6 per front foot for the real
property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer,
provided that no such charge shall be less than $400,
plus the applicable regular capital facilities
` connection charge for dwelling units hereinabove
specified. -
(7) Trunk capital facilities connection charge, commercial
or industrial establishments:
$10 per front foot for the real property fronting on
and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such
front foot charge shall be less than $500.00 plus the
applicable regular capital facilities connection
W charge for new construction and existing structures
other than dwelling buildings hereinabove specified.
(8) Capital facilities connection charge, off-site sewers
not a part of Master Plan relative to reimbursement
agreements:
m The charges for connections to off-site sewers which
are not included as part of the District Master Plan
and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement
Agreement has been entered into between the District
99
6W
and the property owner shall be in the amount provided 40
for in said Agreement. The amount set forth in said
Agreement shall be the amount due whether the original
Agreement is still in force, has been extended, or has
expired. These capital facilities connection charges
shall be in addition to any other charges hereinabove
established for the property connecting to said
facilities. 4
(9) Assessment District capital facilities connection
charge:
The regular capital facilities connection charges
provided in the preceding subsections of this section,
plus a sum of money equal to the assessment charge V
without interest, or Treasurer's charge which would
have been made against the real property on which said
improvements are located had said real property been
assessed within the Assessment District which
constructed or acquired the Assessment District sewer
to which connection is made.
L+
WO
I ,
u
V
V
M
`.I
U
100
u
u
r
702. DISTRICT NO, 11 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
A. District Connection Permit Recuired
.. No application for a permit for a connection to a District
sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which
discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be
considered until a District capital facilities connection
charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit
shall be issued unless there is an established use of the
property to be served or a valid building permit issued
which establishes the use of said property.
B. District Connection Charge Amounts
(1) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction, dwelling buildings:
.d For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per
dwelling unit.
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing
dwelling buildings:
For the connection of each existing dwelling building,
the capital facilities connection charge shall be
$1,500 per dwelling unit.
(3) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction and existing structures, other than
dwelling buildings:
r
For all other new construction, including, but not
limited to, commercial and industrial buildings,
_ hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000
square feet of floor area contained within such
construction, provided that the minimum capital
facilities connection charge for such new construction
shall be $1,500.
(4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement
buildings:
For new construction replacing former buildings, the
capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs
(A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction
® is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or
101
destruction of the former building, a credit against
such charge shall be allowed and shall be the
equivalent capital facilities connection charge for
the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated
on the basis of current charges for new construction.
In no case shall such credit exceed the capital
facilities connection charges.
V
(5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or
alterations of existing buildings:
In the case of structures where further new V
construction or alteration is made to increase the
occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of
buildings to be used for other than family dwelling
buildings, the capital facilities connection charge
shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or i
created, and, in the case of new construction other
than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per
1, 000 square feet of additional floor area contained
within such new construction, provided such new
construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture V
units.
v
r
Ir
it
4
v
V
v
102
LI
II
r
702 DISTRICT NO. 13 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES
A. District Connection Permit Recuired
P
No application for a permit for a connection to a District
sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which
discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be
considered until a District capital facilities connection
charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit
shall be issued unless there is an established use of the
r property to be served or a valid building permit issued
which establishes the use of said property.
S. District Connection Charce Amounts
(1) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction, dwelling buildings:
r
For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital
facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per
dwelling unit.
r
(2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing
dwelling buildings:
For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the
capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500
r
per dwelling unit.
(3) Capital facilities connection charge for new
construction and existing structures, other than
.� dwelling buildings:
For all other new construction, including but not
limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotel
and motels and buildings, the capital facilities
connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet
of floor area contained within such construction,
�e provided that the minimum capital facilities
connection charge for such new construction shall be
$1,500.
(4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement
buildings:
For new construction replacing former buildings, the
capital facilities connection charge shall be
calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs
r (A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction
103
r
6W
is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or it
destruction of the former building, a credit against
such charge shall be allowed and shall be the
equivalent capital facilities connection charge for v
the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated
on the basis of current charges for new construction.
In no case shall such credit exceed the capital
facilities connection charges. !r
(5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or
alterations to existing buildings: V
In the case of structures where further new
construction or alteration is made to increase the
occupancy of dwelling buildings, the capital L
facilities connection charge shall be calculated on
the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (A) and (C)
above for each dwelling unit added or created, or each
1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained
within such new construction, provided such new
construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture
units.
(6) Capital facilities connection charges will be assessed
to local government agencies for connecting directly Ld
or indirectly to the Districts' sewerage facilities.
I
703. ANNUAL SUPPLEMENTAL SANITARY SEWER USE CHARGE V
Every parcel of real property located within the District
which is improved with structures designed for r;
residential, commercial, or industrial use, and connected
to the District's system, may be subject to an annual
supplemental sanitary sewer use charge in an amount
adopted by the Board of Directors by separate Ordinance. L'
704. EXCEPTIONS W
Except as expressly provided in Sections 307 and 705
hereof, relating to exemptions from the payment of
charges, the provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to
all properties within the District, including those
properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes
or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or
statute, including properties owned by other public
agencies or tax exempt organizations.
u
104
W
r
r 705. EXEMPTIONS AND APPEALS
In recognition that certain legal parcels of real property
exist within the District which are not connected to the
District system, it is the intent of the District that
said parcels be exempt totally or in part from the payment
of charges as prescribed herein.
Any property owner may appeal the assessment of the
charges and submit a claim for rebate to the District on
the forms prescribed and provided by the District, within
one hundred twenty (120) days after the annual bill is
mailed. All applications for rebate of the annual sewer
.. service charge will be determined by the General Manager
of the District, who may grant a partial or full rebate or
adjustment of the charge based on receiving satisfactory
proof than an inequity exists between the amount charged
and the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's
systems. Such inequities may include, but are not limited
to the following instances:
.d A. The use of parcel differs from the use indicated by
the charge;
.. B. No service connection to the District's system exists
for the parcel charged;
C. The principal water use is agricultural;
D. Any other use wherein the amount of wastewater
discharged to the District's system is significantly
less on a regular basis than the amount that would
normally be expected to be discharged by the class
of property in question.
706. CREDIT FOR INDUSTRIAL PERMITTEES
A credit shall be allowed to all dischargers permitted
pursuant to Article 3 of this Ordinance in an amount equal
to the annual supplemental sanitary sewer service charge.
Said credit shall be made in the same manner as credit is
allowed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Section 302.6,
303.6, and 304.6(B) (4) above.
105
r ARTICLE 8
SEVERABILITY
r
801. SEVERABILITY
r If any provision of these regulations or the application
to any or circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of
the regulations or the application of such provision to
r other persons or other circumstances shall not be
affected.
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
dV
r
r
106
I ARTICLE 9
W (RESERVED)
µ
' ( 901.
LI
J
u
J
' f .
W
J
rl
w
107
r
ARTICLE 10
ee 1001 EFFECTIVE DATE
The effective date of this ordinance shall be September 8,
1989.
.a
r
r
m
r
Ye
108