Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-06-14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10944 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 +cicW FAX(71 d)962-0388 June 8, 1989 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 8 14 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 - 7 :30 P,M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. secretary Scheduled Upcoming Meetings : FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 28th, at 5 :00 p.m. (Tentative) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 28th, at 5 : 30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA 109Ga EWB AVENUE PO BOX 019 Po WM V4 .ME PA921 7 7"UM-tan JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings June Jun 14, 1989 Jun 28, 1989 July Jul 12, 1989 Jul 26, 1989 LEM August Aug 09, 1989 None Scheduled September Sep 13, 2989 Sep 27, 1989 October Oct 11, 1989 Oct 25, 1989 November Nov 08, 1989 None Scheduled December Dec 13, 1989 None Scheduled January Jan 10, 1990 Jan 24, 1990 February Feb 14, 1990 Feb 28, 1990 March Mar 14, 1990 Mar 28, 1990 April Apr 11, 1990 Apr 25, 1990 May May 09, 1990 May 23, 1990 June Jun 13, 1990 Jun 27, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA June 7, 1989 104i ELLI6 aVEMIE PO BOX 8127 �! FOUNTAIN MLEY.CAWOPMA 92728.9127 ✓ '71419624411 MEMORANDUM TO: Joint Chairman Don Smith Members of Joint Boards of Directors RE: Appeal of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143 Limitations by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson One of the conventional pollutants for which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) establish limits in our NODES ocean discharge permit is biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). In order to carry out both the Federal Pretreatment Regulations and the provisions of the Districts' industrial waste ordinance, staff has established a maximum 10,000 pound per day average limit for large 60D dischargers to our sewerage system. Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson (B/H-W) , located in Fullerton, has appealed the 10,000 pound limit imposed on their tomato processing plant discharge. They are the third industrial discharger that has been subject to the limitation, but the first to refuse to comply. We have been advised by several Directors and other members of the political and business communities that they have received separate communications from the Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson interests regarding this issue. Most of these have not been officially transmitted to the Districts, but from what we have seen it appears as if rather than relying purely on the facts to make their case, and have it presented at a hearing before the District 3 Board of Directors, Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson has felt compelled to resort to a rather vigorous campaign of inflammatory misinformation. The District has chosen not to engage in this pre-hearing rhetoric nor respond or attempt to correct those statements while this appeal is pending. Our arguments will be made before the District 3 Board at its hearing, after which a report will be given to all Directors. We do believe, however, that all Directors should at least have the outline of the issues and procedures. Basically, the dispute is as follows: • Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson questions the authority and propriety of the District staff imposing a BOD limitation and requiring pretreatment of their industrial discharge and a reduction of BOO from their cannery. B/H-W further contends that the District's action amounts to a "taking" of their property. • The District's staff maintains that there is clear federal , state and �.J loca au or y and, in fact, a mandate to implement industrial waste discharge limitations and pretreatment requirements. Nationally, changing environmental standards have required both public (POTW's) and private (356 firms in Orange County) dischargers to reduce pollution (including BOO) by the installation of pretreatment equipment, but B/H-W has refused to clean up their waste. Joint Chairman Smith/Board Members Re: Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson June 7, 1989 Page Two At their April 12th meeting, the District 3 Board received and filed the appeal by B/H-W, and also established rules of procedure for conducting the hearing. At the May 10th meeting, hearing of the appeal was fixed for the regular June 14 Board Meeting. Copies of the extensive appeal documents formally filed by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson have been submitted to the District 3 Directors as have copies of the Districts' response documents. At the hearing the appeal will be presented by counsel representing Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson. The response will be presented by the Districts' General Counsel , representing staff. As reported to the Directors by memorandum of April 21, 1989, the District has engaged attorney B. Richard Marsh of the Los Angeles law firm of Knapp, Marsh, Jones and Doran to act as legal counsel to the District 3 Board during the hearing to avoid any legal conflict wherein B/ W could argue that they did not receive a fair hearing or due process*e; al Pger JWs:sc C � } BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. fox 8127. 10844 EIIIs Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 -� JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING JUNE 14, 1989 - 7 : 30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation ( 2) Roll call ( 3 ) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. ( 6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman `J (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 6/14/89 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTIONS no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as ` mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - May 10, 1989 regular, May 17, 1989 adjourned, and June 1, 1989 adjourned District 2 - May 10, 1989 regular, and May 17, 1989 adjourned District 3 - May 10, 1989 regular, and May 17, 1989 adjourned District 5 - May 10, 1989 regular, May 17, 1989 adjourned, and May 31, 1989 adjourned District 6 - May 10, 1989 regular, May 17, 1989 adjourned, and May 31, 1989 adjourned District 7 - May 10, 1989 regular, and May 17, 1989 adjourned District 11 - May 10, 1989 regular, May 17, 1989 adjourned, and June 7, 1989 adjourned District 13 - May 10, 1989 regular, and May 17, 1989 adjourned District 14 - May 10, 1989 regular, and May 17, 1989 adjourned (8) ALL DISTRICTS Cons e�=on of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" and "B" 5/10/89 5/24/89 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 752,470.45 S 836,257.06 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 4,616,703.09 525,145.87 Joint Working Capital Fund - 186,147.44 158,233.52 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 8,550.72 6,356.25 DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 16.56 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 257,299.64 36,338.50 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 374,794.43 13,024.35 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 25,597.78 4,244.55 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 10,895.43 32,146.04 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 100,294.96 26,428.67 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 1,918.21 6,585.25 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- 4.08 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 69,771 .56 56,258.71 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 8 6 JOINT - 851,916.41 5,576.40' l I DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - -0- 35.42 fir' DISTRICTS NOS. 7 6 14 JOINT - 689.14 2,765.27 $7,257,049.26 $1,709,436.50 -2- p. � 6/14/89 (9 ) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(w) 1 matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase of Twenty-Six (26) Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-145, to W. T. Hillard, Inc. in the total amount of $116,220.00 plus sales tax. See page "C" (b) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase of One 2'h-Ton Crane-Mounted, Flat Bed Truck, Specification No. A-147, to Ole Lee, Inc. in the total amount of $39 ,842.00 plus sales tax. See page "D" (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 38042 issued to Continental Graphics for additional printing services required to print "Action Plan" Draft Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, increasing the total authorized amount from $41,500.00 to $49,443.70, including tax. -3- 6/14/89 (9) ALL DISTRICTS. - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $29,180.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for 11 items of additional work including flagpole illumination, substitution of aluminum expansion joint screed joints for platic screeds, additional electrical circuitry and ventilation ducting in kitchens; additional bathroom lighting soffits; and additional valves on HVAC system; and granting a time extension of 12 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "E" (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 16 to the plans and specifications for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, authorizing an addition of $36,700.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for 11 items of miscellaneous additional work including modification of locker-room showers and restrooms for handicapped persons; miscellaneous modifications to walkways and ladders; installation of safety handrail at termination channel; modification of roof slope; installation of separate grounding for DACS computer control system and replacement of current breakers; removal of undisclosed underground obstructions; and installation of dryers in the air system and other miscellaneous changes; and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said additional work. Seepage "F" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. I to the plans and specifications for Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an addition of $30,857.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for modifications to the water facilities inspection trench required by the City of Fountain Valley, and removal of unsuitable building foundation soil; and granting a time extension of 19 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "G" (g) Consideration of motion approving Change order No. 18 to the plans and specifications for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of $82,028.20 to the contract with Xiewit Pacific Co. for eight items of additional work including removal of undisclosed obstructions; removal of temporary paving; additional chlorine piping in future bar screen channels; installation of a District-furnished influent pump; reinforcement modifications in Tunnel No. 4 at the bar screen and pump room structures; substitution of wall panels at chlorine area to accommodate future storage tank changes; and modification of architectural finish to the building exterior concrete surfaces throughout. See page "H" -4- F tl 6/14/89 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (h) Consideration of the following actions relative to Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility "B" , Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A" , Job No. P2-34: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change order No. 13 to the plans and specifications for said job, authorizing an addition of $98,811.72 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for four items of additional work including caustic pump power modifications; additional costs due to District-requested delays re modifications to "H" and "I" scrubbers to accommodate ongoing odor control operations; improvements to the steam shunt piping system; and additional asphaltic concrete curb and trench paving; and granting a time extension of 121 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page ^I" (2) Consideration of motion approving Change order No. 14 to the plans and specifications for said job, authorizing an addition of $96 ,311.08 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for five items of additional work including modifications to the Plant 1 scrubber complex drain; construction of concrete pad at diesel tank fueling areas at Building 4 at Plant No. 1 and removal of deteriorated asphaltic concrete paving; modifications to foul air ductwork at Headworks "C" to accommodate the new Conveyor Building; installation of methane sensors in each of 17 primary basin dome enclosures; and rerouting of existing 10-inch digester cleaning line around the new 48-inch foul air line. See page J. (i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, authorizing a net addition of $26,462.14 to the contract with Riewit Pacific Co. for eight items of miscellaneous additions and deletions including security fencing modifications; relocation of telephone conduit; existing manhole modifications and repairs; installation of concrete thrust block on waste hauler drain line; installation of restroom facility for the guard shack at the new main entrance; deletion of the Motor control Center in the Metering and Diversion Structure; and deletion and modification of asphalt paving, concrete and piping at the waste Hauler Dump Station. See page "A" -5- o , 6/14/89 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (j ) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing a net addition of $33,600.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 6 Alper for seven items of additional work including rerouting of existing gas and water lines at new meter structure "A" ; modifications to new containment facility at dewatering building; increasing ball valve size from 6" to 8" for 20 valves for Digesters "A" and "B" ; deletion of a new catch basin which will be incorporated into a future project; rerouting high strength sludge piping and connections at Digesters "C" "D" "F., and "G", and exploratory utility location excavation of underground high strength sludge piping system. See page "L" (k) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for design of a steam turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of engine heat to produce additional electricity: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "M" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-51, approving said Addendum No. 4 to said Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $68,972.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $3,592,838 .00 to an amount not to exceed $3,661,810.00. See page "N" (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-52, approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Jones a Stokes Associates, Inc. for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Element of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Programmatic EIR, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $213,126 .00. See page "0" -6- 6/14/89 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (m) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the �✓ Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for design of Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, to provide for relocation of the effluent junction box and polymer facility, realignment of Fuentes Road, and modifications to the equipment and scum trough hatches on the primary clarifiers. (n) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in meetings, hearings, conferences facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts ' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1989-90. (o) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement with the County of Orange for Data Processing Center services relative to collection of the Districts' annual supplemental user fees (estimated annual processing cost is $42,000) (p) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of Temporary Permit for Groundwater Cleanup No. 1-23 issued to the County of Orange John Wayne Airport, extending said permit from July 11, 1989 to July 10, 1990, to allow the continued emergency discharge of contaminated groundwater from John Wayne Airport to the District's sewer for an additional one-year period in order to complete construction of the Michelson Bridge included in the general airport expansion project. (q) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue purchase orders to soils, concrete and materials testing firms for services required, beginning June 15, 1989, for the Districts' construction projects over the next two years, as follows: Total Amount not To to exceed - Smith-Emery Company $200,000 - Twining Laboratories of 200,000 Southern California, Inc. - H.V. Lawmaster 6 Company, Inc. 100,000 - Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. 50,000 - Soils and Testing Engineers, Inc. 50,000 -7- 6/14/89 (9) DISTRICT 2 (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (r) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-59-2, approving plans and specifications for North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer, 1 Contract No. 2-11-3, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is July 18, 1989) . See page "P" DISTRICT 3 (s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1, authorizing an addition of $72,500.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company for payment of bonus for early completion of specified manholes and rehabilitation of one additional manhole; and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "O" DISTRICTS 5 6 6 (t) Consideration of the following actions relative to the contract for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said contract, authorizing an addition of $163,677 .00 to the contract with Christeve Corporation for additional work due to undisclosed utilities; installation of three additional pressure access tees and manholes; removal of contaminated soil; change in grade for now 36" line to accommodate utility lines; additional asphalt paving and backfill due to undisclosed 27-inch force main; and payment of bonus for early completion of contract. See page "R" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-60, accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page Is., -8- 6/14/89 (9) DISTRICTS 6, 7 8 14 (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (u) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-62, approving �..i and accepting Grant of Easement from Rancho Tomas, Inc. , a California Corporation, formerly Apollo Development Corporation, a California Corporation, required in connection with construction and perpetual right-of-way needed relative to the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A; and authorizing payment of $37,700.00 plus costs for said right-of-way. See page ^T^ DISTRICTS 7 8 14 (v) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-64, approving agreement with the City of Costa mesa for a cooperative project to include City street improvements to Baker Street, between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, in the District's contract for construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street t0 Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B; and providing for reimbursement to the District by City for their share of the costs of said joint project. See page U. DISTRICT 7 (w) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate a Professional Services Agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for design of the Campus Relief Sewer, between Jamboree Boulevard and Von Barman Avenue, Contract No. 7-13 . END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration ern of action on items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any ... -9- 6/14/89 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Nom a one for Joint Chairman (Election to be held at regular July Board Meeting) (12) ALL DISTRICTS Coca or on of the following actions relative to Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2: (a) Verbal staff report (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plane and specifications for said project making miscellaneous modifications and clarifications. (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-53, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for said project to Advanco Constructors, Division of aura Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $19,085,600.00. Sae page °V° (13) ALL DISTRICTS o�mi e�can of the following actions relative to NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Report and Recommendation for WERE Ocean Monitoring Program Year Five (1989-90) and Selection Committee Certification of the negotiated fee for Amendment No. 6 to Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfoll, Specification No. 5-032 (Copy enclosed with Directors- agenda material). (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-54, approving Amendment NO. 6 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, extending the contract from July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990, for an amount not to exceed $1,609,570.00 for the fifth year of said contract (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to administer a Portion of the Year Five NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program (Specification No. 5-032-1), previously performed by Science Applications International Corporation, for monthly and quarterly water quality sampling and analyses, semi-annual benthic bioaccumulation sampling, quarterly data submittal and the October 30th Annual Data Submission Report, for an estimated cost of $180,120.00, and authorizing incorporation of the following separate outside contractual services not to exceed $130,300.00, for a total estimated, staff-administered amount of $319,420.00, said work to be implemented pursuant to Districts' staffing, equipment and project budgetary authorizations and procurement regulations: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve proposal of Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) dated April 19, 1989, to provide ocean current monitoring and modeling services and prepare a Year Five Ocean Currents Report (Specification No. 5-032-1A) for a total amount not to exceed $90,300.00 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve proposal of ScoAnalysis, Inc. dated May 24, 1909, to assist staff with data handling and preparation of required quarterly ODES Reports (Specification No. 5-032-18) for a total amount not to exceed $40,000.00 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). -10- ,. 6/14/89 (14) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees' actions and written report of the meeting on May 24, 1989 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by said Committees: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the Committees' report and recommendations re 1989-90 personnel requirements and joint works operating and construction budgets. (2) Consideration of actions re personnel requirements: (a) Consideration of motion approving 1989-90 personnel requirements (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-55, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1989-90 personnel requirements (3) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1989-90 Joint Operating Budget Funds, as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Operating/working Capital $46,581,000 Workers- Compensation Self-Insured 210,000 Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 1,373,000 Public Liability Self-Insured 321,000 (4) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1989-90 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORP Joint works Construction) in the total amount of $102,725,000. (5) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and to place Excess Workers' Compensation insurance coverage effective July 1, 1989; said action to be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 12, 1989. (6) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-56, amending Rules of Procedure Resolution No. 87-51 re Executive Committee membership. See page "w" (7) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-57, approving Amendment No. 10 to Agreement Employing General Counsel. See page "X" (8) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-66, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re Management and Supervisory Classifications' salary range adjustments, pursuant to the Districts' Management Performance Review Program (MPRP) -11- 6/14/89 { (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1989, and declaring that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts until the 1989-90 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. (16 ) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the siness sat orth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (17) ALL DISTRICTS Ot ei— business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 2 Ot er business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21 ) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -12- 6/14/89 (22) DISTRICT 13 0 er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 13 Condon of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 14 OEher mess and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 1 (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90, dated June 1, 1989. See page "Y" (b) Public hearing re proposed Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111: See page "Z. (1) Open hearing (2) Verbal report of General Counsel ( 3) Oral public comments, if any (4) Staff response to oralcomments (5) Close hearing (c) Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111 : (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 112 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 112. (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-58-1, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant \� to Ordinance No. 112 of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90 fiscal year. See page "AA" -13- 6/14/89 (27) DISTRICT 1 0 E eeriness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 1 ` Consideration of motion to adjourn (29) DISTRICT 5 (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90, dated May 31, 1989. See page "BB" (b) Public hearing re proposed Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: See page "CC" (1) Open hearing (2) verbal report of General Counsel .( 3) Oral public comments, if any (4) Staff response to oral comments (5) Close hearing (c) Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 519 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 519. (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-61-5, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 519 of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90 fiscal year. See page "DD" (30) DISTRICT 5 O er siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 31) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn -14- 6/14/89 (32) DISTRICT 6 (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90, dated May 31, 1989. See page "EE" (b) Public hearing re proposed Ordinance No. 613, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 612: See page "FF" (1) Open hearing (2) verbal report of General Counsel (3) Oral public comments, if any (4) Staff response to oral comments (5) Close hearing (c) Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 613, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 612: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 613 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 613. (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-63-6, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 613 of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90 fiscal year. See page "GG" ( 33) DISTRICT 6 others siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any - ( 34) DISTRICT 6 Con side—ration of motion to adjourn ( 35) DISTRICT 11 (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve �J Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90, dated June 7, 1989. See page "HH" [ITEM (35) CONTINUED ON PAGE 16) -15- 6/14/89 ( 35) DISTRICT 11 (Continued from page is) (b) Public hearing re proposed Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: See page ^II^ (1) Open hearing (2) Verbal report of General Counsel (3 ) Oral public comments, if any (4) Staff response to oral comments (5) Close hearing (c) Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1109 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1109. (d) Consideration Of Resolution NO. 89-65-11, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges On the property tax bills , pursuant to Ordinance No. 1109 of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90 fiscal year. See page ^Jill ( 36) DISTRICT 11 0 E e �ness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 37) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 38) DISTRICT 3 (a) RECESS (approximately 5-10 minutes) (b) RECONVENE 1 ' Via✓ -16- 6/14/89 (39) DISTRICT 3 Consi eration of Appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143: (Mailed to Active Directors only UNDER SEPARATE COVER) (a) Open hearing (1) Presentation of historical background of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. site and Industrial Waste Discharge Permit (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. dated March 22, 1989 re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143. (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file Itemization of Items of Evidence dated May 22, 1969 re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143. (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file Statement of Facts and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Appeal dated May 23, 1989 re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143, including: (a) Declaration of James N. Williams (b) Declaration of Robert C. Thomas (c) Declaration of John Baird (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file Statement of Facts and Memorandum of Paints and Authorities In Opposition to Appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. dated June 2, 1989 re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143. (6) Consideration of motion to receive and file Itemization of Items of Evidence dated June 2, 1989 re Industrial waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143, including: (a) Declaration of Richard W. von Langan (b) Declaration of Stephen C. Hough (c) Declaration of David Jenkins (d) Declaration of Kelly Christensen (a) Declaration of Blake Anderson (7) Oral presentation by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. (8) District's oral response to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson's appeal by General Counsel (b) Close hearing (c) Discussion by Directors (d) Consideration of action by Directors to affirm, modify or reverse staff decision re permit limitations (40) DISTRICT 3 O-der Tiusiness and communications or supplemental agenda �.►� items, if any (41) DISTRICT 3 Consi eration of motion to adjourn -17- I' MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone:(714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date June 14, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a) : AWARD PURCHASE OF TWENTY-SIX (26) FOUR-WHEEL ELECTRIC CARGO CARRIERS, SPECIFICATION NO. A-145. The Districts' present-day motor pool consists of 278 vehicles comprised of 190 trucks, various pieces of heavy equipment and automobiles. The remaining 88 are electric carts. As part of an ongoing effort of evaluating our operations to assure that we are being as efficient as possible, staff has studied our motor pool and determined that 54 existing or needed vehicles are used only for transporting workers, equipment and tools within the confines of the treatment plants (each treatment plant site is over 100 acres in size) and do not need to travel on the public streets. We estimate that replacing these vehicles with electric carts will save approximately $27,000 per year. It would have the added benefit of reducing vehicular air emissions. Accordingly, staff has prepared specifications for 26 electric cargo carriers and 28 electric personnel carriers. Thirty-seven of the carts will replace existing high-mileage vehicles that are ready for retirement, and 17 are needed because of the rapidly expanding treatment facilities at the two plant sites. Three bids were received for the 26 cargo carts. It is recommended that award of Twenty-six (26) Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-145, be made to W. T. Billard, Inc. , low bidder, for their proposed amount of $116,220.00, plus sales tax. A bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material . The personnel carriers are being bid under separate specifications and a recommendation for purchase of the personnel carts will be forthcoming at a future Board meeting. -1- June 14, 1989 9(b): PURCHASE OF ONE 2-1/2-TON CRANE-MOUNTED FLAT BED TRUCK, SPECIFICATION N . A-147. The two treatment plants and 33 outlying pump stations have thousands of pieces of equipment that must be periodically removed for maintenance or repair work. For the largest equipment, we generally rent cranes with a capacity of up to 20 tons. However, most of the equipment can be most efficiently handled by smaller, Districts'-owned cranes. Our sewerage facilities are rapidly expanding and it is necessary to acquire an additional truck-mounted 2-1/2-ton crane to accommodate the increasing maintenance and repair work. On May 16, 1989, staff received four sealed bids for One 2-1/2-Tan Crane- mounted, Flat Bed Truck, Specification No. A-147. Staff recommends award be made to Ole Lee, Inc. of E1 Monte for their low bid amount of $39,842.00, plus sales tax. A bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material . 9(c) : CONSIDERATION OF MOTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PURCHASE ORDER CONTRACT WITH CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS FOR ADDITIONAL PRINTING REQUIRED FOR ACTION PLAN DOCUMENTS. In February the Directors authorized the issuance of a purchase order to Continental Graphics of Irvine in the amount of $41,500.00 for printing the draft Wastewater Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan and Executive Summary. The purchase order was issued after receipt of informal bids • from several printers for each document. Quantities were based on estimates of printing which' included text, maps, graphics and binding. At that time the documents were not in final farm. The final report had more pages than originally anticipated. The extra charges were added printing of additional pages, revisions, additional color reproductions and changes in binding. Additional printing was required, therefore, staff recommends the Directors authorize issuance of Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 38042 issued to Continental Graphics, increasing the total authorized amount from $41,500.00 to $49,443.70 including sales tax, a $7,943.70 increase. 9(d) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 TO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4. Job No. J-7-4, Administration Building Addition, includes the construction of additional administration building space and remodeling of the existing administration building and addition of two new parking areas at a cost of $3,549,000.00. Change Order No. 8 adds $29,180.00 and 12 calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. Item 1 adds illumination to the flagpoles in front of the new South Wing at the request of the Districts' representative and project architect to allow continuous flag display, for an additional cost of $2,800.00. The flagpole lighting was not shown on the contract plans. Item 2 provides additional chilled water piping supports for the HVAC piping requested by the project structural engineer at an added cost of $331.00. The pipe supports were not shown on the contract plans. Item 3 adds a 480-volt hot water circuit to serve a new hot water heater, and addition of two map light receptacles in the -2- June 14, 1989 new Board room. These items were not shown on the contract plans and add a cost of $1,979.00. Item 4 changes building exterior vertical plaster screed joints from plastic to aluminum and adds additional aluminum moldings. in the soffits and around all the exterior doors and windows. The plastic screeds are no longer manufactured. This item resulted 1n an additional cost of $11,110.00. Item 5 directs the contractor to modify the ceiling framing in the New South Wing entrance lobby to provide adequate clearance for heating and ventilating ductwork. This modification was requested by the Districts at an added cost of $813.00. Item 6 adds new appliance and convenience outlet circuitry for the kitchens in the new South Wing that was not shown on the contract plans. This additional circuitry was added to provide power for new kitchen appliances selected by the Districts and project architect, and for convenience outlets, at an added cost of $5,287.00. Item 7 adds a cost of $862.00 for reinforcement of shear panels around the perimeter of the Board Room in the new South Wing, requested by the project structural engineer, at locations penetrated by heating and ventilating ductwork. This reinforcement detail was not shown on the contract plans. Item 8 adds ventilation ductwork for the two kitchen range hoods in the new South Wing, requested by the project architect, at an added cost of $1,214.00. The ductwork was not shown on the contract drawings. Item 9 provides for the installation of furring strips at various interior and exterior wall locations to provide a continuous straight surface for drywall or stucco installation. This item was not shown on the contract drawings and was requested by the Districts' project architect at an added cost of $630.00. Item 10 adds soffits and additional lighting over the vanity countertops in the three new South Wing bathrooms. This change was requested by the project architect and the Districts to provide more lighting in the bathrooms. The new soffit details were not shown on the contract drawings and this additional work performed by the contractor is at an added cost of $2,577.00. Item 11 provides for installation of valves on the heating and ventilation system hot and cold water lines. The valves were requested by the project mechanical engineer in order to isolate the new South Wing from the existing Administration Building. This change will allow separate start-up and shut-down of each wing without affecting the other. This additional work cost $1,577.00 and was not shown on the contract drawings. Staff is reviewing these and other changes with the project designer to clarify responsibility for certain items, excluding plan omissions, which were not replacements. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 8 adding $29,180.00 and 12 calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. 9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 16 TO OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT N -1 . The new $28.5 million master-planned Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, is being built under several contracts. It includes five pumps, each capable of pumping 120 mild to the outfall . The capacity of the station is 480 mild with four pumps operating (the fifth pump is a standby, spare pump). Change Order No. 16 adds $36,700.00 and seven calendar days to the contract. -3- June 14, 1989 Item 1 is the inclusion of handicapped persons showers, toilets and other fixtures in employee locker room areas, omitted from the original plans and specifications, at a cost of $8,815.00. Item 2 is the installation of a closure section between the walkway and east side of the pump station to alleviate a possible safety hazard, at a cost of $534.00. Item 3 is for relocations to avoid an interference problem between water piping, the heat pump and doorway in the utility room, at a cost of $968.00. Item 4 provides for five miscellaneous modifications to eliminate various conflicts including an interference between light fixtures and the bulkhead storage rack, removal of a section of walkway support interfering with the bulkhead placed in a storage rack, modifications to ladders to conform to OSHA codes, relocation of electrical switches interfering with the ladders, modifications to bridge crane ladders interfering with the structure, and additional seals for a bulkhead, at a cost of $12,364.00. Item 5 is the installation of a safety handrail at the termination channel at the demolished Rothrock Building to eliminate a potential safety hazard, at a cost of $2,014.00. Item 6 is elimination of a ponding condition on the roof caused by a conflict between the roof slope and an access hatch, at a cost of $2,081.00. Item 7 is the installation of a separate grounding system to protect the computer controls and replacing current breakers for sump pump motors, at a cost of $3,398.00 and a 7-calendar day time extension. Item 8 is the cost of modifications to avoid unknown underground obstructions encountered while driving concrete piling at the pipe supports near Rothrock Pump Station, or removal of the obstructions, at a cost of $4,093.00. Item 9 is the installation of an air dryer in the air lines operating the variable air volume dampers to improve their operating efficiency and decrease future maintenance, at a cost of $1,663.00. Item 10 is the installation of acoustical paneling on the west wall of the basement on a small area designated for a future doorway (that will be completed under another contract) , at a cost of $449.00. Item it Is the extra cost of a new platform grating fastener that will facilitate the removal of said grating for maintenance purposes at a cost of $321.00. Bolts were originally specified. Most of the above described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to its completion. Item 4 includes changes made after the fact and applicable back charges will be made to the designer. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 16 adding $36,700.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. There is a 7-calendar day time extension associated with this change order. 9(f) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, AND IL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20. Job No. J-20, Warehouse and Maintenance Building, and oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, includes the construction of eight new warehouse and maintenance buildings, remodeling of the existing oil storage facility and upgrading of the site paving, storm drain and fire protection systems, at a cost of $3,266,000.00. Change Order No. I adds $30,857.00 and 19 calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. -4- June 14, 1989 Item 1 modifies the requirements for an inspection trench required by the City of Fountain Valley for verification of the city water system pipelines serving Plant No. 1. This verification was agreed to by the Districts as a condition for the City of Fountain Valley to provide a direct water service connection to the Administration Building, Warehouse and Shop areas, all north of the new east/west (North Perimeter) plant circulation road. This item resulted In an additional cost of $10,529.00 Item 2 is to remove and dispose of unsuitable soil found during grading and recompaction under areas for Buildings 5 and 6 in order to provide a stable pad for construction of the new buildings, at an added cost of $20,328.00. This work was directed by the Districts' sails consultant. The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which would have been Included in the original design if discovered or known prior to its completion. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $30,857.00 and 19 calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. 9(g): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 18 TO HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1- , AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMENT OF B ILER; PIPIN LEANOUTS; AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P1- 1. Jab No. P1-20, Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P1-31, Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new 140 million gallon per day influent pumping plant and preliminary treatment facilities at a cost of $31,458,000.00, the largest single project ever awarded by the Districts. Change Order No. 18 adds $82,028.20 to the contract. This change order includes eight items of work for Job No. P1-20. Item 1, for $1,967.00, and Item 2, for $2,296.00, are for the removal of undisclosed concrete obstructions at the Middle Road and new Power Building No. 3A. The unknown underground obstructions conflicted with asphalt paving grades and were not shown on the contract plans. Item 3, for $1,652.00, is for the removal of temporary asphalt paving on the North Perimeter Road. The temporary paving was installed under another contract to maintain continuous access to the existing main entrance. The removal was necessary before the second phase of permanent paving could be installed for the North Perimeter Road. Item 4, for $3,550.00, is for additional chlorine piping at the influent bar screen channels designated for future use. Installing the additional piping now eliminates the need for an extensive plant shut down in the future when these channels are activated. Item 5, for $15,364.00, is for the placement of the future 70 mgd fifth influent pump on the pad in the headworks pump room. The fifth pump was previously purchased by the Districts as a spare or for future use and not furnished under this contract. Installation of this pump at its designed location at this time eliminates the need for a more costly relocation in the future and will also save warehouse storage space. Although the pump will be bolted to the pad, it is not connected. Item 6, for $7,079.20, is for `. reinforcement modifications at Tunnel No. 4 and at the bar screen and pump room structures. The structural section specified for Tunnel No. 4 on the contract plans had to be modified to satisfy design loading criteria. -5- June 14, 1989 Item 7, for $7,997.00, is to substitute removable panels for permanent panels in front of the bulk chlorine tank facility to accommodate the future installation and removal of bulk chlorine storage tanks. Item 8 is for architectural concrete finish modifications for $42,123.00. The Headworks is a dominant structure at the new Plant No. 1 entrance. The original plans called for a sandblasted finish to the structures. However, it was subsequently deemed more appropriate to provide an architectural finish to match other major facilities within the treatment plant site. The exterior finish of the concrete structures was rubbed with a dry mortar to obtain an architecturally harmonious finish. The finish modifications will produce a uniform, smooth, flat architectural finish to all concrete exposed to view. The net added cost reflects a deduction for the specified sandblasting. The above-described modifications are considered by staff to be corrections or changes which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to completion of design. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 18 for a net addition of $82,028.20 and no additional time to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. 9(h): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 13 AND 14 TO COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-26; COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT N0 2 JOB N0. P2-32; FOUL AIR RUBBER SYSTEMS AT PLAN N , JOB NO. P2-. ; AND IMPROVEMENTS TO GRIT FACILITY "B" BILLINGS JUNNLL AND DISTRIBUTI N STRUCTURE "A" , JOB NU. P -34. In September 1987, the Directors awarded a contract for construction of odor control facilities at Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Jobs Nos. P1-25, P1-26, P2-32, P2-33, and P2-34 which provides for domes over all primary clarifier basins, as well as associated work. The malodorous air will be collected and deodorized. When this $20 million project is completed, the consulting engineer believes that odors will be reduced by 95% at the treatment plants. (1) Change Order No. 13 Change Order No. 13 provides for four items of miscellaneous work, a time extension of 121 calendar days and adds $98,811.72 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $55,387.00, provides for the addition of electrical equipment, controls and wiring that when installed at each complex will be utilized to furnish power to the caustic feed pumps at the three scrubber complexes. The original source of power for the caustic feed pump was the scrubber control panel , but that was found to be inadequate to service the caustic pump power load. The discovery of this deficiency in the plans came after the scrubber control panels were installed and when the contractor was preparing to start preliminary equipment testing. The solution was the installation of separate power circuits and controls for the caustic feed pumps. The scrubber panels can then be dedicated to scrubber controls. This change delayed the start of testing at the North Scrubber Complex and ongoing work. The scrubber start-up activities are on the critical path as are the activities that follow (the modifications of "H" and "I" Scrubbers, the demolition of "A" and "B" Scrubbers and the installation of Headworks "C" foul air ductwork). Thus, Item 1 includes a 51-calendar day time extension for the delay. -6- June 14, 1989 Item 2, in the amount of $22,750.00 and 70 calendar days time extension, compensates the contractor for direct costs including on-site supervision and office support caused by the contract delay in the start of the modification work on existing Scrubbers "H" and "I". The contract documents state that the contractor will not have more than one of Scrubbers "H" and "I" out of service at a time. Based on the contract documents, the contractor scheduled the modification work to start prior to the completion of the North Scrubber Complex concurrent with other work. However, when the contractor was ready to start the modification work, he was directed by staff to wait until after the new North Scrubber Complex was operationally complete. This revised work sequence will allow the Districts to use a completed and operating new North Scrubber to minimize odor impacts on the treatment plant neighbors while "H" or "I" Scrubbers are decomissioned for the planned modifications. Item 3, in the amount of $13,839.98, provides for improvements to the steam shunt piping system. The schematics for the steam shunt piping system and the system description provided in the specifications Indicated that the steam heated sludge shunt piping was to be terminated at the highest of the three digester sludge recirculation system discharge nozzles. Staff felt that the shunt system could be improved by having the steam heated sludge enter a typical digester at three locations instead of one. To accomplish this change in process, the contractor was instructed to terminate the shunt piping at the suction side of each digester sludge recirculation pump and allow the heated sludge to pass through the entire recirculation discharge piping system and the three discharge nozzles. Item 4, in the amount of $6,834.74, provides for additional asphaltic concrete curb and asphaltic concrete trench paving requested by the Districts. The contractor placed 658 feet of 6-inch high asphaltic concrete curb along the north side of the Bushard entry road and along the road just to the east of the Plant 2 Construction Management trailers to protect newly landscaped areas. The additional paving was placed over a trench that was excavated and backfilled by Districts' crews for the installation of a new underground city water line between the Harris Tunnel and the Plant 2 warehouse. The Districts elected to have the contractor perform the curb and paving work concurrent with other contract paving work on this job to save the cost of a separate paving contractor's equipment move-in. (2) Change Order No. 14 Change Order No. 14 provides for five items of miscellaneous work and adds $96,311.08. There is no time extension to the contract associated with this change order. Item 1, in the amount of $866.21, provides for the realignment of an existing 12-inch drain that was to be used for the Odor Control project contractor for connection to the Plant No. 1 Scrubber Complex. The existing drain was not in the location shown on the odor control drawings and could not be used as installed. To accomplish the realignment, an existing concrete encasement and an existing concrete thrust block had to be removed from the underground line. Item 2, in the amount of $2,495.00, provides for the construction of a reinforced concrete pad at the diesel fuel tank fill areas at the east side of Power Building 4 at Plant No. 1. The concrete pad replaced asphaltic concrete paving that was deteriorated from fueling activities. -7- June 14, 1989 Item 3, in the amount of $60,577.00, provides for changes to the foul air ductwork at the north end of Headworks "Cu. When the round overhead fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) foul air duct was designed and bid for the "Co Headworks, plans for a new conveyor building (under separate Job No. P2-37) were not yet complete. After the odor control project was in progress, the conveyor building design was completed. The round FRP duct design was changed to a balsa core FRP rectangular shape and the alignment of the duct changed to allow it to pass through the new Job No. P2-37 Conveyor Building. This item also provides for the removal of an existing 72-inch FRP exhaust stack in the "C" Headworks and for two flanged outlets in the new rectangular duct that will be used in the future for the removal of foul air from the new Conveyor Building. Item 4, in the amount of $25,855.00, is for installation of 17 methane sensors in the domes over the circular clarifiers at each treatment plant. The methane sensors (gas detection instruments) were shown on the electrical drawings but were omitted from the specifications. Item 5, in the amount of $6,517.87, provides for the relocation of an existing 10-inch digested sludge line to avoid interference with the installation of a new 48-inch high density polyurethane (HDP) "A-line" underground foul air duct. The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which would have been included in the original design, if discovered or known in the design stage. None of the items are for replacement work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 13 adding $98,811.72 and 121 calendar days time extension and Change Order No. 14 adding $96,311.08 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. 9(1) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO ENTRANCES, SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1,—JOB NO. P1-27. In October 1988 the Directors approved a contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for the construction of Jab No. P1-27, Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1. This $1.6 million project includes a new front entrance opposite the southbound 405 freeway offlon ramps and a new Wastehauler Dump Station. Change Order No. 2 consists of eight items of work for a net addition of $26,462.14. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Item 1 is for $667.75 for modifications to the fencing at the east property line. Six strands of "V"-type barbed wire and angle supports were installed on top of the new fence in lieu of the specified three strands of barbed wire on a single angle support. This modification was necessary to be consistent with the Districts' new security standards. Item 2 is the adjustment of a manhole to finished grade in the East Perimeter Road for $1,199.41. The manhole was not shown on the contract plans and conflicted with new paving grades in the area. Item 3, for $1,080.50, is for the relocation of a telephone service conduit at the new main entrance. The original telephone service was not shown to be relocated on the contract plans and conflicted with new area paving at the entrance. -8- June 14, 1989 Item 4, for $9,218.46, is for the replacement of an existing manhole section at the new main entrance. The manhole section was badly deteriorated and conflicted with new paving grades. The deteriorated sections were removed and a new polyurethane-lined section was installed on the manhole base to the proper grade. Item 5 is for the addition of a thrust block on the waste hauler drain line for $1,109.02. The wastehauler drain line was originally designed to be a gravity line. It was decided during the construction stages of the project to change the design of the wastehauler drain line to a force main to minimize solids deposition problems. This required all bends in the line to be supported by concrete thrust blocks. Item 6, for $20,852.00, included the addition of a restroom, water supply, and sewer discharge piping to the new guard shack at the new main entrance. It was deemed desirable to have plumbing and a restroom at this location, which was not included in the original contract, to accommodate security personnel . Item 7 is the deletion of a motor control center (MCC) in the Metering and Diversion Structure for a credit of $4,400.00. An MCC unit is being installed under another project and it was determined to be better to extend that MCC in lieu of installing the P1-27 MCC unit. Item 8 deletes certain paving, concrete and piping work from the Waste- hauler Dump Station for a credit of $3,265.00. In order to satisfy future wastehauler sampling requirements established by the Districts' Industrial Waste Division, modifications now under design will be made to the station under a separate contract and this work will be incorporated into that project. The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to its completion. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net addition of $26,462.14 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(j) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIESAT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37. This project includes 38 non-related items of rehabilitation and repair work at Plant No. 2. Major items of work include replacement of the domes on Digesters "A• and "B•, built in the early 1950's; replacement of two influent pumps at Headworks "C"; the installation of replacement barscreens at Headworks "C"; replacement of grit augers; screening conveyors; chlorine system piping and waste activated sludge pumps; new primary influent flow meters; and waste activated sludge bypass piping. Change Order No. 2 provides for seven minor changes to the work and adds $33,600.00 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $9,006.00, provides for the rerouting of existing underground natural gas and city water lines at the new Meter Structure "A" to avoid a conflict. Item 2, in the amount of $1,243.00, provides for modifications of construction details on the north wall of a containment structure to eliminate a maintenance problem and to improve constructability of the wall . This item also provides for a change in the construction details for the utility trench bulkhead to allow for the passage of a multitude of process lines through the bulkhead instead of just the single line shown in the plans. Item 3, in the amount of $869.00, provides for the installation of a fresh air fan at the new conveyor building that will be constructed with fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) in lieu of the galvanized steel unit specified. Staff determined that the galvanized unit specified would not -9- June 14, 1989 withstand the corrosive atmosphere at Headworks "CO. Item 4, in the amount of $6,732.00, provides for the change of size for plug valves and knife gates that are to be installed at Digesters "A" and "B". The plans instructed the contractor to replace existing 6-inch ball valves with new 6-inch plug valves and provide additional 6-inch knife gates; however, the line is in fact an 8-inch line (where the line enters the digesters it is, in fact, 6 inches in size). The change is for the higher cost of twenty 8-inch valves in lieu of the 6-inch valves and includes the return shipping costs for the 6-inch valves. Item 5, a credit in the amount of $7,193.00, deletes proposed catch basin and drainage work in the area of the maintenance building and surge towers. Revised plans now call for improvement of the entire catch basin area under a future contract. Item 6, in the amount of $16,399.00, provides for a change in the routing of high strength (i.e. , high BOD) sludge piping at Digesters "C", "D", "F", and "G". The sludge system discharge locations were not in the location dictated by the system process. The plans indicated that the points of discharge were to be in the common pump rooms for the two sets of digesters. The preferred discharge locations were on the exterior of each of the four digesters where the Districts had installed valved connections prior to the start of the work. Item 7, in the amount of $6,544.00, provides for exploratory excavation of the new underground route selected by staff for a new high strength sludge pipe. The location of existing underground utilities and process piping along the proposed underground route was uncertain and it was determined that it would be more cost-effective to excavate the entire trench route to locate underground interferences. The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to its completion or changes made by staff for long-term operational flexibility. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding $33,600.00 to the contract with Ziebarth and Alper. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(k): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-19. During the design phase for the new Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, it became apparent that more engine heat will be available than envisioned in the project report/permitting phase recently completed. The heat, in effect, becomes an additional energy source and recovery of that energy by the installation of a steam turbine/generator system is proposed. The system would generate about one megawatt of power from the waste heat, with no change in air emissions. The total cost is estimated to be less than $1 million while annual power savings of approximately $500,000 would be realized. In May, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit a proposal and negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the professional services agreement for the design contract for Central Power Generation Systems. The addendum would provide for the design of a steam turbine generating system, including a multi-stage steam turbine, a vacuum condenser, condenser cooling water pumps, V condenser vacuum pumps and complete instrumentation and controls for the sytem. Design of the steam production and control equipment is not included in the current scope of work. -10- June 14, 1989 The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee for the additional design work for an amount not to exceed $68,972.00, including direct labor plus overhead at 175%, plus subconsultant fees, direct expenses and profit. The negotiated addendum will increase the total fee for Job No. J-19 from $3,592,838.00 to an amount not to exceed $3,661,810.00. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for Addendum No. 4 to the professional services agreement and adoption of a resolution approving said addendum with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the agenda supporting documents. 9(1 ): APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JONES 8 STOKESASSOCIATES, INC. RE PREPARATION 5F ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR WASTEWATER COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN. In 1988 the Directors approved a professional services agreement with Jones 8 Stokes Associates, Inc. to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) on the Action Plan Wastewater Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan prepared separately by Carollo-Boyle. Although specific tasks were identified in the original scope, it was difficult to know exactly what the needs would be until the master plan work was nearly complete. The scope of the EIR work has, in fact, been expanded in some areas, but it appears as if the work will be accomplished well within the $213,126 budget. However, it is necessary to request a reallocation of funds appropriated to various categories of work. Therefore, staff is recommending that contract category amounts be reallocated to transfer $3,000 from the Direct Labor and Overhead category into the Direct Expenses category to cover the costs of additional word processing, travel costs to attend bi-weekly Action Plan Management Group meetings not contemplated at the time the proposal was submitted, an intermediate preliminary EIR review document including printing and shipping costs, separate EIR Executive Summary, and costs for express delivery, overnight mail and facsimile transmissions to meet revised schedules and transmit additional review documents. There is no change in the total contract amount. 9(m): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 2 FOR PRIMARY LARIFIER NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33. In January 1988, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers to prepare plans and specifications for a 60 mgd primary treatment expansion at Plant No. 1. The Job includes new primary clarifiers and related facilities. The new primary basins will be located on the westerly side of the plant, immediately south of the shop and warehouse area, in an area currently occupied by digester cleaning beds. The basins will be covered with a parking structure similar to Primary Clarifiers No. 1 and 2 which were recently completed. The design also includes relocation of the existing digester cleaning beds, influent and effluent piping and related Junction structures and a new foul air scrubber for odor control . In December 1988, the Directors approved Addendum No. 1 which included modifications to the -11- June 14, 1989 waste sidestream pump station, relocation of the digester cleaning beds, replacement of the supply line to the Orange County Water District's (OCWD) Water Factory 21, and revisions to the polymer dosing system. As the design has progressed, the need for additional modifications has became apparent. The original alignment of the two 108-inch primary effluent lines and location of the effluent junction box had to be modified to accommodate the easement requirements of Southern California Edison. The polymer facility is also proposed to be relocated based on operational experience gained since the original design. Fuentes Road will also be realigned along the east side of the new primary clarifiers to facilitate future expansion needs and to provide better truck access to the relocated polymer building. Redesign of the equipment and scum trough hatches on the primary clarifiers is necessary to provide more convenient access for operations and maintenance personnel , based on operation experience with recently completed Basins 1 and 2. The recommended action is to authorize the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 for the engineering services for the design of the above-described additional work. Following the Selection Committee negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Boards for consideration. 9(n): GENERAL AUTHORIZATION FOR ATTENDANCE OF PERSONNEL AND DIRECTORS AT MEETINGSIN 1989-90. On an annual basis the General Manager is routinely authorized to designate members of the Board and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, etc., which he believes will be of value to the Districts. Such attendance is in accordance with the existing Districts' travel and expense reimbursement policies and the approved annual budget. It is recommended that this authorization be renewed for 1989-90. 9(o): AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR DATA PROCESSING SERVICES RE DISTRICTS SUPPLEMENTAL USER FEE PROGRAMS. Districts 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 have adopted long-range financial plans that include the collection of Supplemental User Fees as a separate line item on the annual County property tax bill. Districts 2 and 7 will consider implementing similar programs next year. In past years the data processing required to determine these fees and to assess the proper parcels was performed under an agreement with the County Assessor's Office utilizing their property file data base. Late in 1988 the Assessor's Office notified us that they would no longer be providing such services to other agencies, and staff has taken steps to find alternative providers. Directors approved an agreement with Arthur Young in January 1989 for the redevelopment, functional design and installation of a computerized supplemental user fee system to take the place of what the County Assessor formerly did for us. This design work, which is nearing completion, was all done on the basis of using the County Data Processing Center. Districts' staff and County General Services Agency staff have reached a tentative agreement to allow the future real-time processing to continue to be performed at the Data Center. -12- June 14, 1989 The action on the agenda is to authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with the County of Orange for data processing services required to `... implement and to process the annual Supplemental User Fee application programs with the same priority, using the same procedures and at the same cost afforded other County Data Processing Center users. The estimated annual processing cost is $42,000. 9(p): APPROVING EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY PERMIT FOR GROUNDWATER CLEANUP AT JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT. In 1986 a policy was adopted that authorizes the staff to issue temporary permits for the discharge of contaminated groundwater to the Districts' sewers under special circumstances for a period not to exceed one year. Although the Districts are not compelled to accept the contaminated groundwater into the sewerage system, we believe that doing so is in the best interests of the community and citizens because such measures help to protect the underground fresh water basin. A temporary permit to allow the emergency discharge of contaminated groundwater to the sewer was issued to the County of Orange for the John Wayne Airport facility on July 11, 1988 to allow the construction of the Michelson Bridge as part of the general airport expansion project. This was done in cooperation and agreement with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Discharge to the sewer occurs on a temporary and intermittent basis and only when the effluent meets the Districts' industrial waste ordinance limitations and when discharge to the storm drain under the airport's NPDES permit becomes impossible, such as a breakdown in the activated carbon treatment system, or when the treatment system is moved from one construction venue to another. The County has requested an extension of the temporary permit. Because staff's authority only allows the issuance of a permit for one year, any extension requires the Boards' approval . Staff recommends that the Boards approve a one-year renewal of the temporary permit to Jahn Wayne Airport so that construction may proceed uninterrupted. The project should be concluded within the term of the renewed permit. 9(q): AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE OF PURCHASE ORDERS TO VARIOUS SOILS, CONCRETE AND MATERIALS TESTING COMPANIES TO SUPPORT THE DISTRI NSTRUCTION PROJECTS. The Directors are well aware of the large construction program now in progress. The Districts do not have a materials testing laboratory and have historically contracted with private firms and the County of Orange to provide soils, concrete and other materials testing. Staff is recommending that purchase orders be authorized to several firms, listed below, so that the Districts are assured of adequate testing support. Necessary services include testing of soils, concrete and asphalt; specialty testing including offsIte inspection of pipe, fiberglass and other materials; and the testing of specialty metal and non-ferrous materials. -13- June 14, 1989 Smith-Emery is a full service construction material testing firm. The services that we normally use include soils testing, concrete testing, and testing of miscellaneous construction materials. This firm will be the prime source for testing services for the current jobs and upcoming jobs within treatment plants during the next two years. Twining Laboratories of Southern California, Inc. specializes in testing construction materials and shop and field inspection of specific construction materials including the offsite manufacture of pipe. Inspection is required on all types of pipe used in our facilities and, in some cases, testing is required prior to incorporating the pipe into the particular construction project. These testing services will be used for inspection of all reinforced concrete pipe to be used for both collection system and treatment plant projects during the next two years. H. V. Lawmaster & Company, Inc. provides general construction materials Inspection and testing services. This firm will be used for soils and concrete testing in conjunction with the collection sewer system contracts during the next two years. Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. will be used primarily for soils testing (soils compaction and density of backfill material ) as a secondary source for testing in the collection system. When several contracts are in progress, the need often arises for soils testing to be performed simultaneously at different sites. If the primary testing services cannot provide the man power when needed, we call upon the secondary testing service. Soils and Testing Engineers, Inc. will be used as a secondary source for soils and concrete testing in both treatment plants. This company will be used when the primary testing services cannot provide the crews when needed. Smith- Twining H. V. Associated Soils 4 Emery Laboratories Lawmaster Soils Testing Engrs. Example of Charges Soil Technician/hr. $37.50 $35.00 $35.00 $42.00 $38.00 Field Technician/hr. 36.00 35.00 35.00 N.A. 38-42 Inspector/hr. 37.50 35.00 35.00 N.A. 38.00 Minimum Charge 4 hrs. 2 hrs. 4 hrs. 4 hrs. 2-4 hrs. Travel Charge Inc. $ 0.50 $ 0.45 Inc. Inc. Maximum Increase/Yr. 3% $ I/hr. • 5% No Increase *Quoted one year contract only. Staff has evaluated proposals from the several firms and recommends Issuance of purchase orders to the five firms in the maximum amounts listed below. Maximum Two-Year Total Smith-Emery Company $200,000.00 Twining Laboratories of Southern California, Inc. Z00,000.00 v H. V. Lawmaster & Company, Inc. 100,000.00 Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. 50,000.00 Soils and Testing Engineers, Inc. 50,000.00 -14- June 14, 1989 It 1s expected that staff will issue additional purchase orders within the two-year period. Most of these will be for specialty testing within staff's �. purchase order authority ($25,000.00). As additional firms are identified which can provide competitive professional testing services, authority will be requested from the Directors. Staff recommends issuance of purchase orders to the above listed firms in the amounts indicated for a two-year period beginning June 15, 1989. DISTRICT 2 9(r): APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTH BRANCH OF THE ROLLING HILLS DRIVE RELIEF SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT N -11- . In 1988, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with Sam W. Peterson 6 Associates to design the North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-3. This sewer has been Identified as being deficient to serve the future needs of the rapidly developing North County area in the City of Brea. The City of Brea also has a portion of their sewer within State College Boulevard and Craig Regional Park which is in need of relief. This portion, which is tributary to District 2's proposed relief sewer, is included in the plans and specifications. A cooperative agreement with the City of Brea for reimbursement of costs for construction of the City's portion has already been approved by the Directors. The consulting design engineer has completed the plans and specifications and staff recommends approval and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contract No. 2-11-3. A tentative bid date of July 18, 1989 is scheduled. The Engineer's estimate for the combined project is $750,000.00. DISTRICT 3 9(s): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE (VAULT) REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. - 8R-1. This project is for the repair of 79 sewer manhole vaults from Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach to Rosecrans Avenue at Beach Boulevard in the City of Fullerton. The vaults have deteriorated over the years from the effects of sulfides in the sewage. Change Order No. 5 adds $72,500.00 to the contract for the specified bonus payment for certain manholes completed ahead of schedule, and for reconstruction of one additional manhole. Item 1 provides a bonus payment of $28,500.00 for the early completion of Manhole Nos. 59 and 63 as specified in Section 50-8 of the contract specifications. Twelve manholes, located in extremely busy intersections, were eligible for early completion bonuses to provide an incentive for the Contractor to finish the rehabilitation work as quickly as possible, thereby minimizing the safety hazard and inconvenience to the motoring public. Manhole No. 59 is in the intersection of Valley View Street and Lincoln Avenue. Manhole No. 63 is in the intersection of Valley View Street and Crescent Avenue. Item 2, in the amount of $44,000.00, is for reconstruction of one additional manhole in the City of Buena Park. The City has scheduled new paving on Valley View Street in the very near future. The added manhole was to be -15- June 14, 1989 reconstructed under a separate project now being designed. It is instead being included in Contract No. 3-28R-1 by change order at the request of both the cities of Buena Park and La Palma, so that it would be completed prior to the city repaving contract. There is a 20-day time extension associated with this added work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 adding $72,500.00 and 20 calendar days to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company. DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 9(t): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 1, AND A P A E RA COMPLETE. This contract is for the replacement of an old, existing 27-inch sewer force main with 36-inch ductile iron pipe. The work includes construction of manholes, valve and appurtenances located within the City of Newport Beach and the State of California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) Pacific Coast Highway right-of-way. The work is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $163,677.00, consists of seven items. Item 1, in the amount of $1,707.00, is for repairing an undisclosed sewer service connection encountered when potholing for other utilities. Item 2, in the amount of $2,567.00, is for the removal and replacement of a plastic gas line which was found to be in the trench area although shown and marked to be out of the trench alignment by the gas company. Item 3, in the amount of $67,593.00, is for the addition of three pressure access tees and manholes installed in the new line to accommodate future maintenance and construction access. Item 4, in the amount of $8,900.00, is for the removal of contaminated soil which had to be transported to a designated disposal site. There was no provision for such work in the contract. Item 5, in the amount of $29,327.00, is for additional excavation to install a portion of the new line at a lower elevation than designed due to conflicts with several utilities at lower elevations than shown on the plans. Item 6, in the amount of $32,583.00, is for additional asphalt paving and backflll in areas where the contractor was directed to widen the excavation to remove the old 27-inch line. The old line was not found to be in the location indicated on the plans. The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to its completion. None of the items are for replaced work. Item 7, in the amount of $21,000.00, is a bonus payment for 42 days early completion of the contract. The contract included a $500/day bonus/penalty provision for early/late completion to help assure that the job will be completed before the busy summer season. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $163,677.00 `✓ to the contract. -16- June 14, 1989 (2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Christeve Corporation has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material , authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $1,655,111.00. DISTRICTS 6, 7 AND 14 9(u) : ACSITION OF PERMANENT EASEMENT FROM RANCHO TOMAS, INC. FOR CONTRACT N QUI14-1-1A, BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPT R. The master-planned Baker-Gisler Interceptor and Baker Force Mains, Contracts Nos. 14-1-1 and 14-1-2, include the construction of farce main sewers and gravity trunk sewers from the Main Street Pump Station located within the "Clear Zone" of the John Wayne Airport to Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. A 90-inch sewer is planned between the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Fairview Road, an 81-inch trunk sewer between Fairview Road and Bristol Street, and dual 42-inch force mains In Baker Street between Bristol Street and the pump station. The project will benefit all three Districts (6, 7 and 14) and will provide the lowest cost construction per unit of capacity possible. Plans and specifications for the first phase of the contract, between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, were approved in April (Contract No. 14-1-1B). Several permanent and temporary easements are necessary for the construction of this line. Appraisals have been prepared or are under preparation for all of them by The Schooler Company of Tustin. The first parcel ready for acquisition is located between the Santa Ana River Channel and the Greenville-Banning Channel northerly of Gisler Avenue. The private strip is owned by Rancho Tomas, Inc. Schooler appraised the 307,000 square foot easement at 10% of the appraised value of the surface, or $1 per square foot. Staff has met with the owner and the owner has agreed to sell for $37,700.0O, $1.23 per square foot (12.3% of appraised value of fee). The appraiser, General Counsel and staff believe that it is in the Districts' best interest to settle this matter for the owner's $37,700 offer. The recommended action is to authorize staff to issue a purchase order for the purchase of the permanent easement from Rancho Tomas, Inc. in an amount of $37,700.00. DISTRICTS 7 AND 14 9(v) : APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF COSTA MESA FOR JOINT CONSTRUCTION OF PORTIONS OF THE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, BRISTOL STREET TO FAIRVIEW ROAD, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-18, AND CITY IMPROVEMENTS TO BAKER STREET. In June 1988, the Directors authorized staff to negotiate with the City of Costa Mesa to include the City's reconstruction of Baker Street between Fairview Road and Bristol Street in Districts' Contract No. 14-1-1B, the Baker-Gisler Interceptor. The cooperative joint project will reduce costs for both the Districts and the City and minimize disruption to the public during — construction activities. The agreement provides for reimbursement of all costs associated with the city's road improvement project. -17- June 14, 1989 The reimbursement agreement has been prepared and approved by General Counsel and the City of Costa Mesa. The action appearing on the agenda is to �..� authorize the General Manager to execute the agreement with City of Costa Mesa. Staff recommends approval . DISTRICT 7 9(w): AUTHORIZING THE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT N -1 , WITH CHURCH ENGINEERING, INC. The 1983 and 1989 master plan reports have both recognized the need for a relief sewer within Campus Drive between the Von Karman Trunk Sewer and the east side of Jamboree Boulevard. The project is most needed to serve future new development on the east side of Jamboree Boulevard bath north and south of Campus Drive, and will drain southwesterly to Van Karman Avenue. Staff is proposing that this project be designed to maximize drainage of sewage to the Campus Relief Sewer since the alternative is to drain northerly to the Michelson Pump Station. Church Engineering, Inc. is doing the site design for a large residential and commercial development located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Jamboree Boulevard and Campus Drive. Accordingly, staff believes it would be advantageous and most cost-effective to have Church design the relief sewer. Staff is therefore recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate a professional services agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for preparation of the plans and specifications for the Campus Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-13. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the agreement will be presented to the Board for consideration. ALL DISTRICTS 11: NOMINATIONS FOR JOINT CHAIRMAN. As provided in the Joint Boards' Rules of Procedures, nominations for Joint Chairman are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman will be conducted at the July regular meeting. For new Director' s information, we have included below an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. 118. Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administration Organization. "A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Chairman. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. -18- June 14, 1989 ... "The nominations for Vice Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in July each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman. "The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chairman becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairman shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairman and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Chairman becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Districts." 12: APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PI-34-2. In February, the Directors approved plans and specifications for construction of new sludge storage and truck loading facilities, modification of sludge transfer equipment, and a 12 kV electrical service center, plant water pump station, and electrical distribution center No. 6. The new 12 kV service center will allow connection of a new Southern California Edison electrical service and will supply power for treatment plant-wide expansions and increase the overall reliability of the plant facilities. The existing plant water pump station has exceeded its normal mechanical life expectancy. This new pump station will replace older equipment, and the design allows for future plant expansion needs. The existing sludge storage and truck loading facility does not comply with new seismic standards, and has reached its limit for accommodating rising sludge production and providing needed storage capacity. Job No. P1-33 primary treatment expansion which will increase sludge production and increase storage capacity requirements. Replacing this facility will provide maximum flexibility for operation of Plant No. 1. Additional work includes replacing the existing sludge conveyor belt system with a cake pump transfer pipeline to the new sludge storage and truck loading facility. Eliminating these conveyor belts will reduce the amount of fugitive odors which occur when transferring sludge and reduce the amount of foul air which needs to be scrubbed. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 deletes the use of an automatic halon fire suppression system in an area which does not need this high level of protection. The addendum also clarifies the size and material for cable trays throughout the new utility tunnels and buildings and adds requirements to facilitate the electrical connection for power which will be generated at the new Central Power Generation System (J-19-1) under a separate contract. Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1. -19- June 14, 1989 (2) Award of Job No. P1-34-2 On May 23, 1989, six bids were received for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2. The bids ranged from a high of $23,691,524.00 to a low of $19,085,600.00, submitted by Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , of Upland, California. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the agenda. Staff recommends award to Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for their low bid amount of $19,085,600.00. The Engineer's estimate for this work was $22,400,000. 13: APPROVING YEAR 5 NPDES OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM. As a condition of the existing five-year NPDES ocean discharge permit jointly issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) , the Districts must conduct an extensive monitoring program designed to characterize the effects of our discharge on the ocean environment. In 1985 the Districts issued a Request for Proposals to provide Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for the Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. 5-032. After evaluation of seven respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to provide these services for the five-year life of the permit, and negotiated a fee for Year 1 (1985-86) in the amount of $917,680. Between the initial contract and Year 4 (1988-89) the scope of the monitoring program has been increased significantly to comply with changing EPA requirements. The Year 4 SAIC effort is $1,942,265. - Enclosed with the supporting agenda documents is the report and recommendation of the Selection Committee along with a detailed analysis of the SAIC proposal for Year 5 (1989-90) of the ocean monitoring program; and the proposal for a portion of the program to be assumed by Districts' staff and other outside contractors in order to realize a cost savings. 14: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMBINED EXECUTIVE/FISCAL POLICY M I MEE The Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees met jointly on May 24, 1989. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its discussions and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 15: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS AFTER JUNE 30, 1989. The individual District's 1989-90 Budgets will not be adopted until the July Joint Board Meeting and, therefore, it is necessary to have Board authorization for the payment of claims from July 1 to the date of adoption of next year's budgets. It is recommended that this routine action, taken annually, be approved as set forth on the agenda listing. 16: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public -20- June 14, 1989 disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICT 1 26: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 112 INCREASING ANNUAL SEWER USER FEES FOR 19 9-90. At the June 1, 1989 Adjourned Meeting of District No. 1, the Directors reviewed the District' s long-range financial program. Based on the forecasts which project significant funding shortfalls due to escalating costs of wastewater treatment and disposal to comply with increasingly stringent environmental standards required by federal , state and local regulatory authorities, the Board of Directors has instituted proceedings to revise previously adopted ordinances for user fees. The Board approved an increase in supplemental user fees for 1989-90 and introduced Ordinance No. 112 to adjust the annual supplemental user fees as follows: Type of User Proposed Annual Fee Single-Family Residential $45.00/Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential $27.00/Dwelling Unit Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $32.00/1000 s.f. of Bldg. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the annual sewer use fee report, hold the second reading of Ordinance No. 112 and final adoption of said ordinance, effective with the 1989-90 Fiscal Year, and adoption of the necessary resolution authorizing and directing the County Auditor-Controller to collect the use fee on the annual property tax bill . DISTRICT 5 29: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 519 INCREASING ANNUAL SEWER USER FEES FOR 1989-90. At the May 31, 1989 Adjourned Meeting of District No. 5, the Directors reviewed the District's long-range financial program. Based on the forecasts which project significant funding shortfalls due to escalating costs of wastewater treatment and disposal to comply with increasingly stringent environmental standards required by federal , state and local regulatory authorities, the Board of Directors has instituted proceedings to revise previously adopted Ordinances for user fees. The Board approved an increase in supplemental user fees for 1989-90 and introduced Ordinance No. 519 to adjust the annual supplemental user fees as follows: Type of User Proposed Annual Fee Single-Family Residential $45.00/Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential $27.00/Dwelling Unit Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $32.00/1000 s.f. of Bldg. -21- June 14, 1989 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the annual sewer use fee report, hold the second reading of Ordinance No. 519 and final v adoption of said ordinance, effective with the 1989-90 Fiscal Year, and adoption of the necessary resolution authorizing and directing the County Auditor-Controller to collect the use fee on the annual property tax bill . DISTRICT 6 32: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 613 INCREASING ANNUAL SEWER USER FEES FOR 1989-90. At the May 31, 1989 Adjourned Meeting of District No. 6, the Directors reviewed the District's long-range financial program. Based on the forecasts which project significant funding shortfalls due to escalating costs of wastewater treatment and disposal to comply with increasingly stringent environmental standards required by federal , state and local regulatory authorities, the Board of Directors has instituted proceedings to revise previously adopted ordinances for user fees. The Board approved an increase in supplemental user fees for 1989-90 and introduced Ordinance No. 613 to adjust the annual supplemental user fees as follows: Type of User Proposed Annual Fee Single-Family Residential $49.00/Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential $29.00/Dwelling Unit Conercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $35.00/1000 s.f. of Bldg. • The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the annual sewer use fee report, hold the second reading of Ordinance No. 613 and final adoption of said ordinance, effective with the 1989-90 Fiscal Year, and adoption of the necessary resolution authorizing and directing the County Auditor-Controller to collect the use fee on the annual property tax bill . DISTRICT 11 35: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1109 INCREASING ANNUAL SEWER USER FEES FOR 1989-90. At the June 7, 1989 Adjourned Meeting of District No. 11, the Directors reviewed the District's long-range financial program. Based on the forecasts which project significant funding shortfalls due to escalating costs of wastewater treatment and disposal to comply with increasingly stringent environmental standards required by federal , state and local regulatory authorities, the Board of Directors has instituted proceedings to revise previously adopted ordinances for user fees. The Board approved an increase in supplemental user fees for 1989-90 and introduced Ordinance No. 1109 to adjust the annual supplemental user fees as follows: Type of User Proposed Annual Fee Single-Family Residential $40.00/Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential $24.00/Dwelling Unit Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $29.0011000 s.f. of Bldg. -22- June 14, 1989 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the annual �. sewer use fee report, hold the second reading of Ordinance No. 1109 and final adoption of said ordinance, effective with the 1989-90 Fiscal Year, and adoption of the necessary resolution authorizing and directing the County Auditor-Controller to collect the use fee on the annual property tax bill . DISTRICT 3 39: APPEAL OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT NO. 3-1-143 LIMITATIONS BY BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON. One of the conventional pollutants for which the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) establish limits in our NPDES ocean discharge permit is biochemical oxygen demand (BOO). Accordingly, in carrying out both the Federal Pretreatment Regulations and the provisions of the Districts' industrial waste ordinance, staff has established a maximum 10,000 pound per day average limit for large BOD dischargers to our sewerage system. Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson (B/H-W) , located in Fullerton, has appealed the 10,000 pound limit imposed on their tomato processing plant discharge. They are the third industrial discharger that has been subject to the limitation, but the first to appeal it to the Board. District 3 Directors have fixed this meeting for hearing of the appeal . Transmitted under separate cover to the District No. 3 active Board members is a package containing the formal appeal by B/H-W and the District' s response. -23- P.E: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 F� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �9 P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 IOBN ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 02708-7018 (714)962-2011 June 8, 1989 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Re: Report and Recommendation for Year 5 NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program (1989-90) and Certification of Negotiated Fee for Amendment No. 6 to Agreement With SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification S-032. BACKGROUND As a condition of the existing five-year NPDES ocean discharge permit jointly issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) , the Districts must conduct an extensive monitoring program designed to characterize the effects of our discharge on the ocean environment. In 1985, the Districts issued a Request for Proposals to provide ocean monitoring contract services for the Districts' 120-inch ocean outfall, Specification No. S-032. After evaluation of seven respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to provide these services for the five-year life of the permit and negotiated a fee for Year 1 in the amount of $917,680. At the time of the original contract award it was noted for the Boards' information that the requirements of this unprecedented monitoring program had been established by the EPA and that it was the first of its kind. Although the EPA had yet to fully define all of the work to be accomplished, the NPDES Permit required that the work commence immediately. Because of this, it was anticipated that as the program proceeded and the requirements were refined, it would be necessary to modify the contract to provide for the changes that would be required by EPA. Accordingly, the contract was increased to $940,486 with the addition of Amendment No. 1 for relatively minor changes in the scope of work. Amendment No. 2 was executed upon initiation of the EPA-required ocean current study which amended the total cost for Year 1 to $1,002,705. In Years 2, 3 and 4, the total was increased by addendas 3 through 5 to $1,530,486, $1,707,294 and $1,942,265, respectively. The changes for Years 2-4 included significant increases in the scope of work required to be performed to better document the environmental conditions in the vicinity of the Districts' ocean outfall. The proposed Year 5 program is unique because it reflects a shift of some of the tasks from SAIC to the Districts and two additional independent outside contractors to strengthen the program while realizing a cost savings. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA IAA ELLIS AVENUE a0 9ozeln FOUN IMN VALLEY.GUMANIA 92728.9127 01.19624.11 Boards of Directors June 8, 1989 Page Two PROPOSED YEAR 5 OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM SAIC continues to provide competent ocean monitoring services to the Districts. However, staff has found that there are cost-saving opportunities by shifting some of the tasks from SAIC to staff and other contractors. It is therefore recommended that the SAIC contract be amended (Amendment No. 6 to Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120- Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification S-032) to remove the tasks for water quality sampling and analysis, benthic bio-accumulation, computer data submission and the October 30 Annual Data Submission Report, and to extend the SAIC contract as amended to include the Year 5 period for a total lump sun of $1,609,570. Staff further recommends that the Districts, with independent outside contractors' support, assume responsibility for monthly and quarterly water quality sampling and analysis, semi-annual benthic bioaccumulation sampling, quarterly data submittal and the October 30 Annual Data Submission Report under a staff-administered Portion of the Year 5 NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program, Specification No. S-032-1, for an estimated cost of $189,120; and that said staff-administered portion incorporate work by the Southern California Water Research Project (SCCWRP) to conduct a current metering and analysis program (Specification No. S-032-1A) as described in their proposal dated April 19, 1989 for a total lump sum price of $90,300, and work by EcoAnalysis to provide data management and evaluation services (Specification No. S-032-18) according to their proposal dated May 24, 1989 on a time and materials basis for a not-to-exceed price of $40,000. This portion of the work would be implemented pursuant to Districts' staffing, equipment and project budgetary authorizations and procurement regulations. The overall Year 5 program is summarized as follows: SAIC Year 5 Contract (Amendment No. 6). . . . . $1,609,570 SCCWRP Current Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,300 EcoAnalysis Data Management Services . . . . . . 40,000 Staff Activities (Estimated) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189.120 51.928.990 This staff recommendation has several distinct advantages. First, the technical strength of the program will be enhanced with the addition of two outside contractors who have specialized expertise in ocean currents and data management. Second, staff scientist oversight and review will be improved by assuming some of the field work and by having a computerized data set readily available for evaluation and interpretation. Third, with a wider group of involved scientists, the environmental sensitivity of the review process will be enhanced. And fourth, although the overall monitoring effort has been increased, the staff recommendation represents a $13.275 cost reduction from Year 4 and a $216,553 cost reduction from SAIC's initial Year 5 proposal. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 9I ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1184A ELLIS AVENUE Po e0x91v EWNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8121 `i Boards of Directors 01e962-2.11 June 8, 1989 Page Three AMENDMENT 90, 6 TO SAIC OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT The Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Amendment No. 6 to the Agreement with Science Application International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. S-032, in an amount not to exceed $1,609,570: Amount Offshore Water Quality $ 0 Benthic Monitoring 737,267 Trawls 179,100 Rigfish 54,236 Data Summary 6 Interpretation 410,567 Additional Services 89,909 Contingencies 12,264 Profit 126,227 Total Amendment No. 6 1.6, 09.570 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the contractor. RECOMMENDATION Attached is a detailed report of the analysis of the combined SAIC and staff- administered program to conduct the required Year 5 NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program (1989-90) . The proposed program has been reviewed with EPA. The Selection Committee recommends approval of Amendment No. 6 to the SAIC agreement and authorization to expand the program to add two additional independent scientific contractors and increase staff scientist participation and overview as described above and in the attached staff report. \s\ Don E. Smith \s\ Ron Hoesterev Don E. Smith Ron Hoesterey Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman \s\ Don R. Griffin \s\ Blake P. Anderson `i Don R. Griffin Blake P. Anderson Past Joint Chairman Director of Technical Services RESOLUTION NO. 89-54 APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO AGREEMENT WITH SAIC FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR C DO 1 - N H OCEA UTFALL,-SPECIFICATION NO. S-032 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO AGREEMENT WITH SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (SAIC) FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL, SPECIFICATION NO. S-032, EXTENDING CONTRACT FROM JULY 1, 1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of.Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 provided for the acquisition of additional laboratory instrumentation and authorized additional laboratory work to perform analyses on ocean sediments for trace constituents to comply with additional requirements imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 provided for modifications to the Current Monitoring Program required by EPA; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 extended the contract from July 1, 1986, to June 30, 1987; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 extended the contract from July 1, 1987 to June 30, 1988; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 extended the contract from July 1, 1988 to June 30, 1989 and provided for program modifications for the contract period from July 1, 1987 through June 30, 1988 as well as the fourth year of said contract, July 1, 1988 through June 30, 1989; and provided for a reduction in fees to be negotiated for years one, two and three of said contract; and, \� WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement to extend the existing contract from July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the established procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,- 13 and- 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 6 dated July 1, 1989, to that certain agreement dated August 7, 1985, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14. for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. 5-032, providing for extension of the existing contract from July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990 (Contract Period Five) , is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by $1,609,570.00 for the fifth year of said contract, increasing the total authorized compensation from $6,229,523.00 to $7,839,093.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment No. 6 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALWORNIA 10814 ewe AVENUE P0.BON 8127 June 6 1989 14MWAIN VAL Y.CALIFORNIA B M-8127 0141 BB2.2N1 STAFF REPORT Amendment No. 6 to Contract With SAIL Ocean Monitoring Services Specification No. S-032 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY In August, 1985, the Districts entered a one year agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to perform the marine monitoring activities required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) as part of the Districts' 301(h) ocean discharge permit. The agreement has been modified and extended by Board actions through Year 2, Year 3, and Year 4 ending June 30, 1989. For Year 5 SAIC submitted their original proposal (hereafter referred to as Year 5(1) )on March 14, 1989 for the continuation of their role as the major contractor through the fifth and final year of the Districts' existing ocean discharge 301(h) monitoring program. Following meetings with Districts' staff, SAIC submitted a revised proposal on April 7, 1989, (Year 5 (2) ) and a third proposal (Year 5 (3) ) on April 27. The SAIC Year 5(3) proposal is unique from previous years because it reflects cost reductions brought about by the Districts' staff proposal to shift some of the ongoing tasks from SAIC to the Districts ' staff and other technnical support contractors. In Table 1, the initial Year 1 proposal costs from the four qualified vendors that responded to the original RFP in June, 1985 are compared to SAIC costs for Years 1 through 4 and the proposed 5(3) version of Year 5. The scope of the program has increased significantly during the last four years, particularly when the changes in the program are taken into consideration, yet the costs are still comparable to those of the other vendors initial proposals. A comparison of the negotiated Year 5 costs with Years 1 through 4 are presented in Table 2. Figure 1 graphically shows the major categorical costs from Year 1 of the marine monitoring program through the three proposals of Year 5, and the combined SAIC Year 5(3) and Districts effort. Also presented in Figure 1 are the increased costs for the Districts responsibilities for various portions of the Year 5 program. 1 Table 3 combines the SAIC Year 5(3) proposal costs and the Districts' costs to obtain the total costs of the proposed Year 5 ocean monitoring program. The Year 5 combined program is estimated to cost $1,928,990 compared to $1,942,265 for Year 4, a savings of $13,275. However, additional work is required in Year 5 and SAIC's proposal 5(2) totaled $2,145,523 for this change in scope of the monitoring program. The staff is proposing to assume a portion of the work and contract a portion to other firms cutting the SAIC Proposal 5(2) by a net of $216,553, thus reducing the overall Year 5 cost to the $1,928,990 amount. EVALUATION one of the major Year 5 cost increases from Year 4 is caused by charges for a method of organic contaminant analysis for tissues and sediments. The method, termed "isotope dilution", follows the EPA recommended guidelines for organic analysis. Isotope dilution was actually initiated during Year 4, but much of the cost was absorbed by SAIC. Districts' staff had originally decided to approach isotope dilution during Year 4 with a scaled-down demonstration project. However, because some portions of the results from Years 1, 2 and 3 were under review, staff decided that moving directly to the superior isotope dilution method during Year 4 was necessary to verify the veracity of Years 1, 2 and .3. SAIC did not charge the Districts for the added costs of isotope dilution during Year 4, and offset approximately $110,000 of it from their profit. An evaluation and comparison of program costs from Year 4 to Year 5 follows: SAIC First Proposal - 5f11 SAIC submitted their first proposal for Year 5 on March 14, 1989. Table 4 shows the major monitoring task increases and decreases from Year 4. The more expensive isotope dilution organic analysis technique being used year 5 is the major contributing factor for the increases over Year 4 in the benthic program ($56,568) , trawl program ($37,910) and the rigfish program ($13,733) . These three proposed program increases totaled $108,211. Other proposed increases from Year 4 are data interpretation and evaluation ($125,322) and additional services ($38,931) , Table 4. These increases came at the Districts' request for a more thorough and in-depth evaluation of the data. The proposed $175,930 increase in the profit is artificially inflated due to the Year 4 SAIC-sponsored method validation study. These costs were applied against profit and absorbed by SAIC, thus reducing the SAIC Year 4 profit. 2 The proposed Year 5(1) increase in total cost over Year 4 is $379, 358 (Table 4) . SAIC Second Proposal - 5(2) After meeting with Districts' staff, SAIC submitted their second proposal (5(2) ) on April 11, 1989. Further cost reductions from proposal 5(1) were seen in the water quality program ($303, 668) due primarily to a reduction in the scope of the ocean currents subtask. This resulted in a $116,755 net decrease from Year 4. A $53,803 reduction from SAIC Proposal 5(1) occurred in the benthic program primarily as a result of the Districts assuming the responsibility of the benthic bioaccumulation subtask. The Districts' personnel and contract vessel Enchanter IV would be utilized. This resulted in only a $2,765 net increase over the Year 4 effort. Other reductions from Proposal 5(1) were seen in the ($ 4,368) trawl and rigfish ($373) programs, permit reapplication assistance ($7,072) , quarterly staff meetings ($1,466) held with the Districts, EPA and CRWQCB, and SAIC's profit ($16, 536) . The overall reduction from the Year 5(1) proposal was $176, 100, thus decreasing the total to $2,145,523. This is still an increase of $203,258 over Year 4 (Table 4) . SAIC third Proposal - 5 M After further consultation with the Districts, SAIC submitted their Third Proposal (5(3) ) on April 27, 1989. The major difference in the Year 5(3) proposal is that the Districts would assume the responsibility of the water quality program (sampling and analyses) and the computer data submittal tasks of the ocean monitoring permit. The water quality task is reduced from $441, 949 in Proposal 5(2) to $-0- in Proposal 5(3) . Some of the SAIC field program management, direct costs and boat expenses that will still be incurred but had been accounted for in the water quality program are shifted to the benthic, trawl and rigfish programs. The proposed 5(3) benthic program increased $26, 303, trawl program increased $1,812 and the rigfish program increased $900 over the Year 5(2) proposal. SAIC Proposal 5(3) reflects a $69,765 reduction from Proposal 5(2) in the data summary and interpretation task because of the Districts assuming the responsibility of the quarterly data submittal to EPA and the October 30 annual data submittal to the CRWQCB. Some of the SAIC data management costs will still be incurred and are included in the data management subtask in Proposal 5(3) . Other reductions from Proposal 5 (2) occurred in the equipment and weather contingencies ($8, 186) and profit ($45,068) . 3 The total for Proposal 5(3) is $1, 609,570 which is a $712, 053 reduction from Proposal 5(1) , and a $332,695 reduction from �.../ Year 4. DISCUSSION The Year 5(3) proposal reduction of $332,695 from Year 4 is due partly to the Districts assuming the responsibilities for four tasks of the ocean monitoring program using staff and miscellaneous contractors. These four tasks are water quality, benthic animal tissue bioaccumulation sampling, quarterly computer data submission to EPA, and the October 30 Annual Data Submission Report. The following paragraphs discuss the advantages and costs of the Districts assuming these tasks. The water quality task consists of sampling for a variety of water quality parameters at nine monthly stations and 11 quarterly stations and characterizing the currents around the outfall. The Districts' cost for the water quality task is $187,770. Its major components are: a) a one year $90, 300 current meter program contracted to the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) , b) sampling costs which total $21,600 (Table 5) , c) laboratory analytical costs (Table 5) which total $48, 600, d) the one time purchase of a current profiler for $17,270, and e) the one time purchase of a $10, 000 infrared spectrophotometer for oil and grease analyses. The benthic animal tissue bioaccumulation task consists of attempting to gather enough tissue of the small animals living in the ocean sediments 12 stations to analyze for 128 pollutants. The Districts will perform this task for an estimated $14 , 400 compared to the SAIL proposal 5(1) of $59,723 . The Districts' staff and contract vessel Enchanter IV will conduct sampling using EPA's criteria of a "reasonable amount of effort" in an attempt to obtain enough tissue to analyze for priority pollutant bioaccumulation. The SAIL proposal 5 (1) has analysis costs built into this task which historically has not been used because sufficient animal tissue has only been infrequently obtained. If enough tissue is obtained at any of the stations, then analyses will be performed using either the Districts' Laboratory or under the existing outside service laboratory. The third task consists of submitting computer data on a quarterly basis on magnetic tapes to EPA. The Districts will assume this task for approximately $115,000 which is a $27, 151 increase over SAIC's proposed $87,849. This includes a $40, 000 data management and analysis contract with EcoAnalysis. The final task being assumed by the Districts is the October 30 Annual Data Submission Report. This is a summary of all of the data collected during the year and is submitted on magnetic tape to EPA. The projected cost of this report is reduced from the SAIC proposed $6, 639 to the Districts cost of $2, 250, a savings of $4,389. 4 The advantages of assuming these four tasks are the Districts will have direct involvement and control by staff scientists and technicians to ensure the quality of the data that is generated; and will incur cost savings. The main advantage of assuming the computer data submission task is that the Districts will have full control over the data and can ensure its quality and useability. Also, Districts' staff will input the data into our data base management system making it more accessible to staff scientists for analysis and interpretation. Summary In summary, staff recommends accepting the SAIC Year 5(3) proposal for $1, 609,570. The $332,695 reduction from Year 4 (and $712,053 reduction from SAIC's Year 5(1) proposal) is primarily due to a reduction in scope of SAIC's responsibilities which will be assumed by the Districts and other outside contractors. The overall ocean monitoring program is not being reduced and, in fact, is being increased. The Districts, under this proposal, will assume the responsibility of the water quality sampling and analyses, the benthic bioaccumulation sampling, the computer data submission and the October 30 Annual Data Submission Report. SAIC retains the responsibility for the sampling and analyses of the benthic monitoring, trawls, rigfish, the remainder of the data summary and interpretation and the task identified as additional services. The costs for assuming the abovementioned responsibilities using Districts staff and miscellaneous contractors are estimated at $319,420 (See Table 5) . The estimated total of the Districts' costs and SAIC's proposal 5(3) is $1,928,990. This is a savings of $216,533 from the SAIC's Year 5(2) proposal. Overall it is a cost savings of $13,275 from Year 4. RECOMMENDATION SAIC continues to provide competent ocean monitoring services to the Districts. However, staff has found that there are cost saving opportunities by shifting some of the tasks from SAIC to staff and other contractors. It is therefore recommended that the SAIC contract be amended (Amendment No. 6) to remove the tasks for water quality sampling and analysis, benthic bio- accumulation, computer data submission and the October 30 Annual Data Submission Report and to extend the contract as amended to include the Year 5 period for a total lump sum of $1,609,570. Staff further recommends the following contracts: Southern California Water Research Project (SCCWRP) (Proposal attached) to conduct a current metering and analysis program as described in their proposal Dated April �..r 19, 1989 for a total lump sum price of $90, 300. 5 EcoAnalysis (Proposal attached) to provide data management �....i and evaluation services according to their proposal dated May 24, 1989 on a time and materials basis for a not to exceed price of $40,000. Staff further recommends that the Districts assume responsibility for monthly and quarterly water quality sampling and analysis, semi annual benthic bioaccumulation sampling, quarterly data submittal and the October 30 Annual Data Submission Report for an estimated cost of $189, 120 to be implemented pursuant to staffing, equipment and project budget authorizations. The overall Year 5 program is shown in Table 6 and summarized as follows: SAIC Year 5 Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,609,570 SCCWRP Current Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,300 EcoAnalysis Data Management Services . . 40,000 Staff Activities (Estimated) . . . . . . . . . . 189,120 1 .928.990 BPA:MM:au REF#920117.RP 6 TABLE 1 COST COMPARISON OF SAIC CONTRACT HISTORY AND OTHER QUALIFIED VENDORS BIDDING ON INITIAL YEAR 1 CONTRACT Original Year Proposals Year 5 Kimetic Lab/ Brown B Science Applfcatiors Districts K.P. Lindstrom ECO Caldwell InternatiomI Corporation 8 SAIC Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5(3) Offshore Water Quality S 282,078 S 672,471 S 466,181 S 136,675 $ 391,225 S 394,252 S 558,7D4 S 187,T70 Benthic 632,001 901,157 706,465 423,013 530,798 582,342 708,199 751,667 Trawls 85,352 92,121 121,778 79,328 105,922 115,576 143,746 179,100 Rfgffsh 54,768 22,142 32,875 20,915 31,614 34,271 39,976 54,236 Date SuamrY interpretfon 413,670 484,402 385,804 162,634 247,075 274,578 342,650 487,817 Additional Services 45,824 21,414 23,846 30,079 39,394 48,723 60,660 89,909 Total Cost $1,513,697 $2,193,707 $1,736,949 $1,002,705 51,530,486 $1,707,294 $1,942,265 S1,928,990 MN:au REF#920M XLI WATER QUALITY W/O CURRENTS CURRENTS aoo 3110 000 zao 2110 . .o lso x0 2110a 0 0 L : L Go me a 0 1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(2) 5(3) 5- 1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(2) 5(3) 5- BENTHIC TRAWL 900 — 200 175 750 i 150 600 1 125 x 0 1w x 0 450 0 0 300 0 73 150 � 2.5 0 i i F, 1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(2) 5(3) 5' 1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(2) 5(3) RIGFISH DATA INTERPRETATION as so 4110 40 376 3w 0 x 00 150 a 30 X0 a 20 I: L L s 7 F 1 2 3 4 3(1) 3(2) 5(3) 1 2 3 4 5(1 ) 5(2) 5(3) 5- Districts estimated costs to take over Li SAIC Charges portions of program in year 5. Figure 1. HISTORY OF OCEAN MONITORING CHARGES (p.,. 1 of 21 ADDITIONAL SERVICES too 90 b..i 90 sa ro 1 so $z; 0 2 0 SO a 0 40 fr. 2 10 rt'e 0 1 2 0 4 5(11 3(2) 5(2) PROFIT 200 175 ISO 1 125 X 0 f00 0 1/ SO ' 2/ O 1 2 2 4 S(1) 5(2) S121 TOTAL COST 2400 2100 lam 1 1100 X 0 1200 0 /00 000 000 O 1 2 2 4 5(1) 6(2) 3(2) 5- Districts estlmated costs to take over -. SAIC Charges It portions of program In year S. Figure 1. HISTORY OF OCEAN MONITORING CHARGES ("go 2 of 21 TABLE 2 Sununarizatfon of SAIC Charges Years 1 - 5 TMK/SOBTASKS Year 1 Yosr 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 MlVear 5 MlYear 5 (3) A. OFFSHORE WATER MIALITY MONITORINO Cost S Monthly Chemical & Physical Sampling 66 943 123 662 126.55 141,035 148.01 148,016 0 Monthly Bacterial Sampling 12 120 8 518 9 834 43 087 30 228 23,220 0 Quarterly Chemical & Physical Sampling 28 323 SL 417 55 964 71 908 66 338 66.09 0 Ocean Current Monitoring 32 204.628 201.904 291.416 301.039 204,616 0 Celiferm Sar;aiinq Charges 0 0 O 11,258 0 0 0 Total 136,675 391,225 394.25 558 704 545.61 441,949 0 B. BENTHIC MONITORING QuartarLy Sampling 26 807 51.1 57.0 60,501 63.10 63,106 81,528 Quarterly Benthic Infaune Identification 78.401 115,7281 122.833 130,485 136.18 136,184 137.148 Qwrterty Chenicel & Ph feel Analysis 184.499 247."Il 265.513 359.3541 379.6571 375,578 380 244 Semiannual aiosccunuletion 41,951 25.7091 38,399 43.2291 59.7231 0 0 Annul Sampling 9,791 9 3i0 10.2 10 941 10.0621 10.662 12,315 Annual Benthie IMaune Identification 12,476 17 320 18.24 19,375 20.809 20.809 20,809 Annuat Chested and Physical Analysis -AS 6L 153 70 894 84 314 105 223 105,223 105.2 Total 402,297 530 798 582.34 708 199 7" 767 710,964 737,26 C. TRAWLS Semiannual Trawl Survey 16 653 21 672 23 582 25 324 29 694 29,698 31,011 Annual Metapathotogy Studies 10 245 13 825=M 17 933 26 333 26,333 26,6 Annual Priority Pollutant Saeptl na 52.430 70,425 76.55 100,489 125,629 121.25 121.481 Total 79,328 105,9 175 576 143.74 181,656 177.288 179,100 D. RIG FISHING Fish ComnMtfon Survey 1,071 1.177 1.245 1.344 1.5791 1.579 1,579 Semiannual Fish Survey 6,843_12 566 13.079 13.799 13.7111 13,734 14,632 Semiannual Priority Pollutant S tin 9.5 14,142 19,050 19,059 29.948 29.533 29.533 Areal Kistopethology Studies 3 415 3 729 4 897 5 774 8.451 8,490 8.4 Total 20 915 31 674 36 271 39 976 53,70 53.33 54.23 E. DATA BWMMARY AND INTERPRETATION MmrterLy ODES Rewrt 4 49B 62,4 77,1 80,003 87,863 87.849 0 October 30 Annual Report 13.228 12,578 13,320 4,202 7,022 6,639 0 January 30 Annual Report 47,089 74 968 80 003 133,122 174,980 198,312 198,312 Data Storage, Management 97.81 97,102 104,066 106,153 113 779 131,730 156,453 Additional Annual Re rt Requirements 0 01 0 19.2001 84 358 55,802 55,802 Total 162.634 247,0751 276 578 342.6501 468.002 480,332 410.5 F. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Liaison with Distrlet/Mena anent 21,106 28 763 37,172 39,690 56,485 56.48 56.48 Quarterly Review Meeting with Districts 7.111 10.241 11.153 12.158 20.066 18,600 18,600 Camera Andy Copy of Reports 1,862 410 399 0 0 0 0 QC Dosunent Review 0 0 0 3,658 5,963 4,817 4.81 Permit Reapplication Assistance 0 0 0 5 154 7 072 0 0 Contract Conptetfon Activities 0 0 0 0 10,005 10,005 10,005 Total 30,0 39 394 48,723 60 660 99,591 89.9 89 909 Equipment Contingencies 0 10 300 10 300 10 225 10 225 10,225 6 132 Weather Contingencies 0 10,30 10,300 10,225 10,225 10,225 6,132 Additional Studio & Costa Not Included 82,953 35.3 110,676 55,949 0 0 0 Profit 87 824 128 549 126 276 it 901 187,831 171,295 126.227 Total with Ammandnents L Options-I 002 705 1 530 486 1 707 2914 1 942 265 2 321 623 2 149,523 1,609,570 7au/REFs920095.ML2 TABLE 3 Combined SAIC Proposal 5(3) and Districts Costs For The Preferred Ocean Monitoring Program TASK/SOBTASKS Year 5 (3) Eat. Distriees Coat SAIC/Distriet Coat A. OFFSHORE WATER DIMLITY MONITORING Namthty Chemical 8 Physical Semplim 0 69,400 69,400 Monthly Bacterial SmaNAing 0 10 800 10,800 Quarterly Chemical 8 Physical Samptirs 0 0 0 Ocean Currant Mmiter1rag 0 107,570 107 570 Coliform Sampling Charge, 0 0 0 Total 0 187,770 187,770 B. BEMTMIC NOIITORING Quarterly Sampling 81.5 0 81.52 Quarterly Benthic Infaune Identification 137.148 0 137.1481 Quarterly Chemical 8 Physical ArmLysla 380 2K 0 380 2K Semi Amwl 0iamem,m nation 0 14.400 14,400 Auraal Sampling 12,315 0 12,315 Areual Banthic Infaune Identification 20.809 0 20 809 Ammml Chemical aM Physical Aral is 105 223 0 105,223 Total 737,267 14,400 751 667 C. TRAWLS Semienmml Trawl Su 31,011 0 31,011 Amaal HistopathoLogy Studies 26 60B a 26,605 Arsuml Priority Pollutant Smtim 121.481 0 121,461 Total 179,100 0 179.100 0. RIG FISHING Fish Cwmurfiptim Survey 1 579 0 1.5 Semi Aural Fish Sury 14 632 0 14,632 Semi Ameal Priority Pollutant Sarpting 29 533 0 29,533 Amaml HistopathoLogy Studies 8 M 0 9,492 Total 54 736 O 54,236 E. DATA SmmART AMP INTERPRETATION Quarterly ODES Report 0 115 000 75,000 October 30 Ammal Report 0 2.25 2.250 Jaruery 30 Aral Report 1911 312 0 198 312 Data Storage, Management 156 453 0 156,453 Adfiti oral Amael Report Requireenta 55.802 0 55 802 Total 410,567 117,250 527 817 F. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Liaison with District/Maragemorit 56 0 56,487 Quarterly Review Neetirg with Districts 18,600 0 IB 600 Camera Ready Copy of Reports 0 0 0 OC Donment Review 4,81 0 4,817 Permit Reapplication Assistarce 0 0 0 Contract Comptetice Activities 10 005 0 10,005 Total 89 909 0 89,909 Equipment Conti mein 6,1 0 6,13 Weather Conti fes 6 132 0 6,132 Additimml Studies 8 Costs Not Included 0 0 0 Profit 126,227 0 126 227 Total with Anmendmnts d tiara 1,609,570 319,G20 1 928 990 IDI/w/REF0920095.%L3 Sarre/ TABLE 4 Comparison of SAIL Year 4 Coats and Proposed Year 50), 5(2), end 5(3) Coate Tasks Year 4 Year 5 50) 5(2) 5(3) Mcwt M t over Amount Amount Over Aaoutt Aaant Over Yr 4/(Under) Yr 4/(Under) Tr 4/(Under) Water Quality $558,704 $545,617 (E13,087) 441,949 ( 116,755) 0 (E558,704) Senthic 708,199 764,767 56,568 710,964 2,765 737,267 29,068 Trawls 143,746 181,656 37,910 177,285 33,542 179,100 35,354 Ri9fishine 39,976 53,709 13,733 53,336 13,360 54,236 14,260 Data Sumary/ 342,680 468,002 125,322 480,332 137,652 410,567 67,887 Znterprotatior Additional Survey 60,660 99,591 38,931 89,909 29,249 89,909 29,249 Contin0mciec 20,450 20,450 0 20,450 0 12,264 ( 3,156) Additimat Studies 55,949 0 ( 55,949) 0 ( 55,949) 0 ( 55,949) Profit 11,901 187,831 175,930 171,295 159,394 126,227 114,326 Total $1,942,265 S2,321,623 8379,358 $2,145,523 $203.258 $1,609,570 ($332,695) Ms. REFB920130.XL1 TABLE 5 Cost* Misc. Outside Equipment Amluol Mrs. (230/hr.) Contractors Costa Total Water Quality Sampling 720 S 21,600 S 21,600 (SCCWRP) Ocean Currants E 90,300 90,300 Seabird Current ProfiLer 17,270 17,270 SubtotaL E 129,170 Lab Costs Fecal 360 10,800 10,800 TSS 504 15,100 15,100 Ammonia 504 15,100 15,100 Graeae 6 OIL 252 7,600 7,600 Subtotal S 48,600 IR Spectrophotometer 10,000 10,000 Total S 187,770 Benthic Bloeceunulation 480 14,400 14,400 Subtotal S 14,400 Odes Data Submission 2,500 73,000 75,000 Data Management (EcoAnalysis) Support 40,000 40,000 Subtotal S 115,000 Oct. 30, Annual 75 2,250 2,250 Subtotal 2,250 Total 5 395- S161,850 S 130,300 $ 27,270 $ 319,420 Districts$ Task Sub-Total 319,420 SAIL Contract Total $1,609,570 Ocean Monitoring Program $1,928,990 *Based on hourLy labor rate plus 71 percent cost allxation as per BILL ALdrich memorandun July 1, 1988. -Breakout of Annual Hours: Data Handling SampLing Analysis Total Compliance Division 2,075 690 1,620 2,755 Laboratory Division Soo 520 1,620 2,640 5,395 Mau REFB920095.kL4 TABLE 6 YEAR 5 OCEAN MONITORING MISC. SAIC Districts Contractors Total Offshore Water Quality 0 97,470 90,300 187,770 Benthic Monitoring 737,267 14,400 0 751, 667 Trawls 179,100 0 0 179, 100 Rigfish 54,236 0 0 54,236 Data Summary & Interpretation 410,567 77,250 40,000 527,817 Additional Services 89,909 0 0 89,909 Contingencies 12,264 0 0 12,264 Profit 126,227 0 0 126,227 Total $1,609,570 189, 120 130, 300 $1,928,990 MM:au REF$920130.XLS - A PROPOSAL ON SPECIAL STUDIES FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS FROM Dr. Terry Hendricks Southern California Coastal Water Research Project 646 West Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, California 90806 April 19, 1989 Task 1. Measurement of Currents in the Vicinity of the Wastewater Outfall Objective: The transport of wastewater constituents away from the outfall is governed by the movement of the ambient ocean currents and (in the vicinity of the diffuser) the currents induced by the initial dilution process. Measurements of the ambient currents at a single location are conveniently obtained using a moored current meter. These measurements are useful for estimating the range of initial dilutions achieved by the diffuser, the availability of the required ambient water for dilution, the dispersion of wastewater constituents—including the sedimentation and resuspension of effluent and natural particulates. Background: Current measurements have been carried out in the vicinity of the Orange County outfall by SCCWRP and more recently and extensively,by Science Applications International (SAI). The SCCWRP measurements focused on the outer portion of the shelf and slope (water depths from 50-350m) and in San Gabriel Canyon. Meter depths generally ranged from 40m to 350m(canyon measurements to 550m). These measurements were concentrated on the portion of the water column below the pycnocline and near the bottom. In addition to describing the basic properties of the currents, these studies examined correlations between changes in the flows on the slope and over the shelf. The SAI measurements cover the shelf area(including the head of Newport Canyon), in water depths ranging from 35m to 80m). Meter depths ranged from 13m to 74m. As in the SCCWRP studies, the SAI measurements essentially characterize the properties of the currents below the pycnocline. Measurements were made at depths on the order of 13-14m to characterize the motion of the surface waters. However,subsequent analysis of temperature data indicated that this location was often within a region of large temperature gradients. Since significant shear generally occurs across this region (an approximation to a"thermocline"), during some periods these shallow records are probably a mix of surface layer and deeper currents due to vertical motions of the thermocline resulting from internal tides and longer-period baroclinic processes. Method: A single sub-surface, taut-line, mooring will be placed in 52-55m of water at the location shown in Figure 1. This location was selected to measure the ambient currents away from the influence of the outfall (i.e.the flows induced by the initial dilution process),yet provide estimates of the initial speed and direction of motion of the wastefleld away from the outfall. The mooring will contain three current meters. The meters will be positioned at depths of (approximately) llm,35m, and 53m below the surface to provide records of the motion of the surface layer, the mid-water (typical wastefleld depth), and near-bottom waters. A depth of 1Im for the upper meter was selected as a compromise between the desire to ensure that the meter is 2 redominantly within the surface layer, and concerns about the safety and security of the mooring (pand the requirement of a surface float) if the upper float is shallower than lOm. The lower meter will be at an elevation of 2m above the bottom Several years of sediment trap studies of sediment resuspension carried out by SCCWRP in this area indicate that the bulk of resuspended sediments are transported within the lower few meters (e.g.3m) of the water column This near-bottom meter will provide data required to estimate the transport of resuspended material and,in combination with wave data (discussed subsequently), can be used to estimate the stress on the ocean bottom and the likelihood of sediment resuspension. The mid-water current meter, at a depth of 36m,will measure currents at a depth comparable with the probable location of the wastefield in the water column when the water column is stratified. This information is useful for estimating the transport of wastewater and the distribution of sedimenting effluent particulates. In combination with the near-bottom measurements, and the temperamre measurements at both depths, the mid-water currents will also provide a data base for estimating the initial dilutions achieved with the outfall. Although the near-surface meter will be positioned closer to the surface than in the SAI measurements, there is still the potential for contamination of the records by shear across the thermocline (but less so than at the 12-14m depths). The primary value of ese current measurements will be during periods when stratification of the water column is a minimum, resulting in an increased probability of the formation of a surface wastefield. During these periods of weak stratification, shear can be expected to be reduced and the near-surface measurements will improve the capability to estimate wastewater transport. Each current meter will also record the ambient temperature. SCCWRP current meters will be used at the mid-water and near-bottom depths to maximize the sensitivity and accuracy for weak flows. An InterOcean S-4 current meter will be used at the near-surface depth to min+mi distortion of the record by surface gravity waves. This meter will also contain a pressure sensor. In combination with the near-surface current measurements, this pressure information can be used to generate a time-series of the surface gravity wave field. This wave data, in combination with the near-bottom current measurements,would be useful in estimating the magnitude of increased stress on the bottom, and their frequency of occurrence. Scope of Work: Time-series of current velocity, temperature, and water pressure (wave field) will be collected by the upper meter. Time-series of current speed and direction, and temperature,will be collected at the mid-water and near-bottom depths. Sampling intervals will be 15 to 45 minutes, and the measurements will be carried out for twelve consecutive months. The mooring will be serviced at one or two month intervals, at which time the data will be retrieved and processed. Summaries of the analysis of each data set will include: 1. Probabilities of current speed and direction for each meter; 2. Characterization of the variations in time (spectral analysis) for the currents, temperature, and differences in temperature; 3. The monthly net speed and direction of flow, the principal axes of variation, and the corresponding variance (decomposed into two frequency bands— sub-tidal and tidal/super-tidal); 4. The average temperatures; �.. 5. Progressive vector diagrams; and 6. Probability matrix of wave amplitude vs. period. 3 In addition, time-series of currents (spd/dir), temperature, and waves (amp/per) will be transmitted to Orange County on floppy diskette. A final report will be submitted. In addition to summaries of the monthly data (described above), this report will include an analysis of longer-term (e.g.seasonal) changes in the properties of the currents, temperature, and wave climate. Work Schedule: It is anticipated that if this proposal is accepted, the field work will commence in July, 1989. We expect that notification of funding will allow us time to obtain and test the InterOcean S-4 meter before it is needed in July. Diskettes containing the monthly time-series will be submitted within 3 weeks of the servicing of the moorings, and the final report will be submitted within 3 months of the final recovery of the meters. Budget: SSaff Hours Solt T.Hendricks 240 H. Stubbs 200 D. Diehl 200 J. Nelson led.) 40 $39,000 Inter Ocean S-4 current meter 23,000 Supplies 3,400 Total $65,400 4 Task 2_ Identification of Ocean Current Flow Patterns in the Area Around the Orange County Ocean Outfall Objective: Empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis will be applied to the current meter data collected by Science A plication, Inc. in the vicinityty of the Orange County Sanitation Districts ocean outfall off Newport untington Beach from 1986 to 1988. This analysts technique identifies reoccurring flow patterns that exist among the current meter moorings and their respective contributions to the overall observed (measured) flows. A streamfunction calculation(equivalent to assuming quasi-geostrophic flow)will be used to extend these flow patterns away from the immediate vicinity of the current meter moorings to a larger area. Time-series of the variations in the dominant flow atterns will be constructed from the original observations, and used to estimate the frequency of occurrenceof these "elemental" flow patterns and"composite"flow patterns (simultaneous contributions from two, or more, elemental patterns to the flow). Usefulness: This analysis identifies dominant, reoccurring flow patterns that exist in the vicinity of the ocean outfall. The number of patterns, and their corresponding spatial variations, can be used to determine the number of current meter moorings that are required to describe the circulation within the area, and the appropriate locations for these moorings. In addition, analysis of the frequency of occurrence of these elemental patterns (and their strength) can be used to describe the speed and direction of transport of wastewater away from the outfall, and the probability of occurrence of representative composite (i.e. combinations of the elemental flow patterns) circulations. These results describe the transport of wastewater over time-scales of several days, and thus for assessing the potential for impact of the discharge on various sensitive or protected areas. It is also anticipated that these elemental flow patterns, either in their statistical form (described above) or in combination with their temporal variations, may provide a useful and improved method of estimating the transport and initial sedimentation of effluent particulates. Background: It is frequently convenient to decompose currents into components on the basis of the spatial and temporal characteristics. An example of spatial decomposition is the transformation into "alongshore"and "cross-shore" components. Temporal variations are frequently decomposed into "tidal , "sub-tidal" (i.e. slowly varying), and"super-tidal" (rapidly varying) frequencies. The relative contributions of each of these frequency bands to the overall flow generally changes with direction. For example, tidal and super-tidal frequency fluctuations usually dominate the cross- shore motions,while sub-tidal (and to a lesser degree, tidal) frequencies dominate the longshore motions. 5 The distances (length-scales) that water is transported by currents associated with each frequency band depend on both the frequency (i.e. the duration of the flow in one direction) and the strength of the flow. In general, the sub-tidal frequencies (e.g. periodicities > 1 day) dominate the transport over distances in excess of 1-2 kilometers, tidal fluctuations give rise to transport over distances on the order of 1-2 kilometers, and the super-tidal variations result in small scale dispersion of the wastefield. It follows that the sub-tidal frequency motions determine the direction and rapidity of transport of wastewater constituents away from the outfall—except in the immediate vicinity(1-2 kilometers) of the diffuser. Examination of the data collected from a single current meter often shows that there is a preferred axis for the sub-tidal motions. Along sections of the coast with relatively "straight" bathymetery this axis generally corresponds closely to the orientation of the isobaths. The direction of this axis is identified from the current meter records by finding the direction corresponding to the maximum variance. EOF analysis extends this type of flow direction identification to situations with more than one current meter(i.e. multiple spatial locations--either vertically, or horizontally). In areas with more variable bathymetery, the circulation patterns can be expected to be more complex than a simple alongshore flow. Examples of such areas include Santa Monica Bay, and the bight lying south of San Diego Bay and Point Loma. We developed an analysis method, using EOF and streamfunction calculations, to assess the potential impacts of a discharge from a proposed outfall in the southern portion of the San Diego bight on the nearshore bathing water and kelp beds along this section of the coast This technique proved to be a convenient, quantitative, and easily comprehensible method of analysis for these assessments. The technique and results are described in Appendix A (attached)—more complete details are available in the study report to Engineering Science (Hendricks and Christensen, 1987). One result of this study was the identification of two dominant flow patterns. Based on this result, and the corresponding spatial patterns, it was possible to carry out a second year of current measurements with only two appropriately located current meter moorings (instead of the original six) without a significant loss of information on the flow in the area The bathymetry in the region around the Orange County outfall is also relatively complex. Downcoast from Newport Canyon, the shelf is relatively narrow (1-3 km). Upcoast, however, the shelf expands offshore in two steps (separated by San Gabriel Canyon) to a width on the order of 20 km, then contracts back toward the coast in the vicinity of San Pedro Canyon (and the Palos Verdes headland). In shallower water(e.g. on the order of 30m), however, the bathymetry of the region between the Palos Verdes headland and Newport Canyon is better described as relatively straight, or even a mild bight. This bathymetry may give rise to a more complicated circulation than is observed along relatively straight sections of the coast, leading to increased cross-shelf transport. For example, a large eddy was one of the dominant flow patterns identified in the San Diego bight,with potentially important effects on the siting of the proposed outfall from the standpoint of cross-shelf transport and the potential for effluent recirculation. Scope of Work: We propose to utilize the existing current meter data collected by SAI under contract to the Orange County Sanitation Districts for the period from mid-1986 to mid-1988. 6 Elements of the analysis include: 1. Inventory of the available data(locations, depths, durations of usable data, etc); 2. Conversion of the data from NODC format(approx. ?? million bytes) to SCCWRP format(estimated to be about?? million bytes); 3. Basic analysis (e.g.temporal characteristics,principal axes, etc); 4. Decomposition of-the the data into two frequency bands ( 1-tidal and super-tidal and,2-sub-tidal.); 5. Generation of the cross-correlation matrix for the sub-tidal components. 6. Use EOF analysis to obtain the flow patterns (modes) and their relative importance; 7. Calculate the time-series for each flow pattern; 8. Compute the,joint modal probabilities for the dominant modes; 9. Use a streamfunction calculation to compute and illustrate the regional flow patterns for the dominant modes; 10. Compute and illustrate representative composite flow patterns; 11. Compute the small-scale dispersion associated with the tidal (and higher frequency) fluctuations;and 12. Describe the results in a report Work Schedule: It is anticipated that work can commence on this project immediately after the project is approved. The final report will be submitted 6 months after commencement of the work Budget: Staff Hours cost T.Hendricks 300 J. Nelson 40 522,100 Supplies 800 Total S2Z900 7 w,o,w nmtaor 0 R. n1lw:an nen oen o�+ ili, y II a 21 / ey { \+ noann9 4m4 c 9ww. me W iaenonuow w 0eea $J e:N ai15:.. a,nmw wm ru rnen \ 9 ` IRb 101, / \ T >pff atit . Y / a54 / \�i .... Nu' NcxoN■ I 'Al 54 $ 114 , T s IR14 \ e 14 �i s• s \ I le IwQi e, ^i.x•„ R �;gy ,Lt61 21 21 17 \ is 1. 14 1 p II yr a ri ti \ u 2 \ Is u 13 is 27 21 ,g e H � Is 12 1� 42 $ II i\ 22 \ I , 21 21 62 p$y RA\ Ra 29 y n p/ M6�� ""2e 71 at \ I Imo•• ` �.wl \ F�i.M N'O/ i, wr K ee 11I \\\\''JJ5$ySST.�.1..r � \ 20 93 47 1f 1 07 C '14e \\ tl r1 92 sty\ a0i\ a] . C=7q \\\ Or lxf( ,\�T IM �� -.� \�IB $ s In la \ 14 170 05 �tJ A i IN 1e4 120 /1"' 145/ I I lac 2R \ 2R4 .3 /\\9\ 21 % / 216 / \ 20T/ ` / 1194 174 •" B9 •SW I \ \2XI m 2R9 \ 22� \ 21 248 6AN PEQRO N\ 7IL �\ 5 240 242 tRT iN0158 R 18746 zz9, �xz b1AACH I , T,9 0./. \1� I x. i N J i O 1y . \ �� teo / 264 0 + ° co .. ... .................. _._._...__._...____..._................. ..................................... w ' . A .. _.... C7 =- z .. 0 0 00 T N 6 C nI r luVl N I 6 00 -tl£ 3QRLLLHIOv ££ _ Eco na sis EcoAnalysis, Inc. Arcade Plaza • Sulte A 221 E. Motlllja Street Ojai, CA 93023 (805) 646-1461 Proposed Plan for Database Support for the Orange County Sanitation District Ocean Monitoring Program Prepared by EcoAnalysis, Inc. May 24, 1989 OBJECTIVE EcoAnalysis proposes to provide data management, programming, and analytical support services for Orange County Sanitation District's ocean monitoring program for a cost not to exceed $40, 000. These services include incorporating new data into the current database system, technical support, and preparation of ODES reports. Services will be provided as they are needed and billed on a time and materials basis. STATEMENT OF WORK EcoAnalysis' work will include the following: o Incorporation of new data into the present database system. Data are expected to include effluent data from the laboratory, water quality data from the profiling system, and data from outside contractors. These will be checked, refor- matted, and entered into the database in a manner consistent with the historar-ai data alr=ady present. o Technical and analytical support. EcoAnalysis programmers and analysts will be available for use by Orange County personnel for any programming or analytical applications on an as needed basis. o ODES preparation. The database will be expanded to include quality control and other cross-reference information and integrated with custom written programs with the goal of producing ODES reports inhouse. BUDGET Services to be provided will not exceed a total cost of $40, 000. EcoAnalysis- labor categories and rate structure are listed in the table below. Labor Category Rate (per hour) ------------------------------------------ Management $ 75.00 Senior Analyst 75.00 senior Programmer 75.00 Analyst 65.00 Programmer 65.00 junior Programmer 50.00 Technical Writing 50.00 Data Entry 25.G0 Administrative Support 25.00 VAX computer time 10.00 / hour Travel mileage .24 / mile Expenses cost + 15% v RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 21 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA May 24, 1989 13844 ELLIS AVENUE y va.2O%e127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 2272bB127 (71AIN2.2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE/FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES Meeting Date: May 24, 1 _ p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Present: Present: Don E. Smith Joint Chairman Ron Hoesterey, Chairman Ron Hoesterey Vice Joint Chairman Bill Mahoney Robert Hanson Chairman, District 1 James Neal Buck Catlin Chairman, District 2 Wayne Silzel Richard Polis Chairman, District 3 Peer A. Swan John Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5 Richard B. Edgar Chairman, District 7 Absent: Tom Mays Chairman, District 11 Peer Swan Chairman, District 14 Don R. Griffin Don Roth County Supervisor James A. Wahner Roger Stanton County Supervisor Absent: STAFF PRESENT: Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager James Wahner, Chairman, District 6 Blake Anderson, Director of Technical Svcs. Hank Wedaa, Chairman, District 13 Bill Clarke, General Superintendent Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering Ed Hodges, Senior Facilities Manager OTHERS PRESENT: Gary G. Streed, Chief Admin. Assistant and Acting Director of Finance Director Charles Sylvia Ray Young, Safety Coordinator John Dunlap, SCAQMD Gracie Tucker, SCAQMD Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel 1) Presentation on Employee Commuter Program Required by SCAQMD TFegu9a On The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has adopted a rule that requires carpooling. It is one of many measures adopted by SCAQMD for reducing vehicular air emissions. The rule requires certain employers (including the Sanitation Districts) to establish an employee commuter program beginning July 1, 1989. At last month's meeting, the Committee reviewed the Districts' proposed program to comply with Regulation XV and considerable discussion ensued concerning the various requirements of Regulation XV and alternatives for complying and the Committee decided that it would be helpful to the members to have a formal presentation at this meeting. SCAQMD representatives John Dunlap -1- Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees Report May 24, 1989 and Gracie Tucker attended the meeting and reviewed the Regulation XV requirements, some existing approved programs, various incentives to achieve compliance and distributed information. Enclosed (green) is a copy of Regulation XV. Members of the Committees asked several questions of the SCAQMD representatives regarding Regulation XV, certain of its provisions, incentives for employees to participate in various program elements and enforcement of the Regulation. Several Directors indicated a preference for a plan that does not require payment of cash incentives by the employer. 2) Status Repa rt and Approval of Actions Regarding Pending SCAQMD Permit to onstruct for 0 MGD Primary Treatment Expansion at Reclamation Plant No. 1. At the Committee's April meeting the members discussed at considerable length the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) evolving requirements for obtaining a Permit to Construct (PTC) the next master-planned Increment of primary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. In order to provide the required data for the SCAQMD permit processing, considerable outside technical assistance and specialized consulting services are needed. To ensure that the required technical data is developed in a timely manner to keep this important project on schedule and avoid any further permit processing delays, the Joint Boards on May loth, authorized the Executive Committee to approve for execution by the General Manager, agreements for specialized professional consulting services; testing and analytical services; procurement of materials, equipment and services for installation and operation of facilities for pilot scale testing; and acquisition of air emission credits pursuant to SCAQMD new source review regulations. These measures are necessary to comply with SCAQMD requirements for the proposed 60 mgd primary treatment expansion of Reclamation Plant No. 1. The permit to construct must be received from SCAQMD before the Districts can bid the job for construction. Staff reported that it has been able to engage the necessary technical assistance required to date within its procurement authority ($25,000) , and reviewed the enclosed (buff) separate status report and recommended actions. Following a general discussion the Committee took the following actions: • Re Preparation of Health Risk Assessment. 1. Ratified the staff action of issuing a purchase order to Dorado Enterprises in an amount not to exceed $5,000, for fabrication of enclosures over certain plant facilities to enable gathering of air samples. -2- Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees Report May 24, 1989 2. Ratified the staff action of issuing a purchase order to VOC, Inc. , in an amount not to exceed $15,000, for gathering samples in accordance with SCAQMD protocol , delivery of the samples to a laboratory for analysis and preparation of a final analytical report. 3. Ratified the staff action of issuing a purchase order to Del Mar Analytical in an amount not to exceed $10,000, for laboratory analytical analysis of air samples. • Re Purchase of Offsite Emission Credits. 1. Ratified the staff action of issuing a purchase order to Carleton Engineers in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for assistance in locating, evaluating and permitting offsite emission credits and related assistance for Job No. P1-33. 2. Approved a purchase agreement with Kimstock Inc., of Santa Ana in an amount not to exceed $673,750 for 550 pounds per day of VOC credits, and authorized the General Manager to execute said agreement in a form meeting General Counsel 's approval. • Re Issuance of Public Notice. Ratified staff action in issuing a purchase order to Towne Advertisers Mailing Service in an amount not to exceed $7,000 for preparation of the mailer, including postage, for the required SCAQMD public notice. 3) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations re 1989-90 Joint Works Budgets. Fiscal Policy Chairman Hoesterey reported that the Committee had met several times over the past few months to consider the 1989-90 Joint Works Budgets. He reviewed the enclosed booklet containing the following budgetary recommendations: (a) Personnel Recommendations (blue): Forty-one new positions are recommended to provide staffing required by major treatment plant expansion, new program implementation to comply with changing regulatory requirements, to operate and maintain the facilities and to support related activities. Many of these positions will not be filled until later in the year, and some may not be filled at all if completion of construction projects is delayed. The recommended positions are in support of a variety of programs as summarized in the following: -3- Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees Report May 24, 1989 Program/System Position Administrative Support (Accounting, Purchasing, Warehousing, MIS/EDP) 6 Risk Management/Safety Engineering 1 Odor Control and Air Scrubbing Systems 2 Sewage Collection Systems 2 General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 4 Regulatory Compliance 4 Source Control Program 5 Process Monitoring 8 Laboratory 2 Facilities Planning 8 Design 5 Construction Management 10 41 The recommended new positions will raise the authorized staffing level from 497 to 538 at a maximum annual salary of $1,489,260. Because additions will be staged based on actual need and completion of new facilities the estimated cost for 1989-90 is $1,191,689. Employee benefits add approximately 27% to the salary costs. (b) Joint Operating Fund (green): The net cost of administering the Joint Districts ac iv�t es and and maintaining the Joint Treatment Works for 1989-90 is estimated at $46.2 million. Revenues and other offsets in the amount of $1.7 million will reduce the net Joint Operations requirements to $44.5 million, up 14.5% from the 1988-89 budget. Of this, 5.7% (approximately 40%) of the increase is due to inflation and plant expansion and 8.8% (approximately 60%) is the result of regulatory mandates. A little over one-third (35%) of the budget increase is due to additional staffing requirements as summarized above. Sludge disposal and utilities each account for approximately 20% of the increase and the remaining 25% is spread between chemicals, repair and maintenance materials and other supplies. 1%./ -4- Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees Report May 24, 1989 (c) Self-Funded Insurances: Included in the Joint Operating Budget, the following self-funded budgets are consistent with the Boards' past Board actions relative to these plans: 1. Workers' Compensation (pink) 2. Self-Funded Health Plan (goldenrod) 3. Liability (salmon) (d) CORF Joint Works Construction (yellow]: The CORF budget sets forth a $10 . million rea ent pan cons�ction program for 1989-90 in accordance with the 30-year Action Plan Master Plan now under consideration by the Boards. Recommendations: The Committees recommend approval of the proposed 1989-90 personnel requirements and Joint Works Operating and Construction Budgets. 4) A21; Min Fiscal PolicyCommittee to Place Districts' 1988-89 Workers' Ompensa ion xcess insurance Coverage. Staff reported that the Districts' Workers' Compensation Excess Coverage insurance policy expires on July 1, 1989. The Districts' present policy for statutory workers' compensation coverage (unlimited benefits) with an annual self-insured retention level of $250,000 carries an annual premium of $30,040.00. Because of the way the insurance marketplace works, the Districts' broker has advised that he may not have quotations for the 1989-90 coverage in time for consideration by the Boards at the regular June meeting. Inasmuch as the current coverage will expire between the Boards' June 14th and July 12th regular meetings, staff recommended that the Fiscal Policy Committee be authorized and directed to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and place appropriate excess workers' compensation coverage effective July 1, 1989; and that the actions taken by the Fiscal Policy Committee be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 12th. This is similar to procedures followed by the Boards in past years. The Committees concur with staff's recommendation to authorize the Fiscal Policy Committee to place the Workers' Compensation excess coverage insurance effective July 1, 1989. 5) Amending Boards' Rules of Procedure re Executive Committee Membership. Joint Chairman Smith reported that the Boards' current Rules of Procedure �..i provide that the immediate Past Joint Chairman serve as a member of the Executive Committee. He observed that the insight and knowledge that Joint Chairmen gain in their almost daily involvement in the Districts' activities -5- L Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees Report May 24, 1989 during their term of office has proved to be a valuable resource to the Executive Committee in its deliberations of the many important issues that the Boards face. He also noted that the sitting Joint Chairmen have found the advice and assistance of their predecessors to be most helpful as well . Joint Chairman Smith recommended that the Boards' Rules of Procedures be amended to provide that each Past Joint Chairman that remains on the Board of Directors be a member of the Executive Committee. The Committees recommend that the enclosed (salmon) resolution amending the Boards' Rules of Procedure to provide for all Past Joint Chairmen to be members of the Executive Committee be approved. 6) Review of General Counsel 's Compensation. The Committees discussed the enclosed (gold) proposal from the Districts' General Counsel for an increase in compensation proposed to take effect July 1, 1989. The last review and adjustment was in November 1987. Mr. Woodruff has been very active in both AMSA and CASA. He currently chairs the CASA Attorneys Committee and is past chairman of AMSA's committee. Mr. Woodruff represents the Districts in a superior manner in legal matters, both inside and outside the agency, has a very good relationship with Districts' staff members, and continues to exhibit enthusiasm and energy in his representation of our interests. The Committees believe that he provides excellent legal services to the Districts. The Committees recommend approval of an amendment to the Agreement for Employment of General Counsel , incorporating increases to compensation in accordance with Mr. Woodruff's proposal , effective July 1, 1989. 7) Closed Session re Personnel Matters. The Joint Chairman convened the Committees into closed session for a discussion of personnel matters. Enclosed is a separate confidential report and recommendation from the Committees. If any Director wishes to further discuss the report or recommendation, the Joint Chairman will adjourn to closed session at the Board meeting. -6- REGULATION XV TRIP REDUCTION/INDIRECT SOURCR RULE 1501 GENERAL RULE 1502 DEFINITIONS RULE 1503 CONTROL OF INDIRECT SOURCES - INCREASE IN AVERAGE VEHICLE RIDERSHIP BY EMPLOYERS OF 100 OR MORE EMPLOYEES RULE 1504 PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANS RULE 1505 EXEMPTION �f (Adopted December 11, 1997) RULE I501. GENERAL This regulation sets forth the actions employers which employ 100 or more persons at any worksite must take to promote employee participation in trip reduction and ridesharing programs. These programs are intended to reduce emissions from vehicles used for commuting between home and the worksite. It is the intent of the District to work with affected employers and local jurisdictions in improving trip reduction activities, to encourage small employers to pin transportation management organizations, and to evaluate the effectiveness of this regulation two years after it has been fully implemented to insure that it is as effective as possible. It is also the intent of the District to substitute the provisions of Regulation XV for those of Regulation VII. If the Environmental Protection Agency does not approve deletion of the traffic abatement requirements of Regulation VII, the District will consolidate the two regulations so that employers will be required to submit only a single plan. The implementation of this regulation will begin July 1, 1999. The regulation requires the Executive Officer to give notice of plan requirements to the affected employers ga a phased schedule. Affected employers shall submit plans ninety days after receiving notice. Affected employers must review and update the plans annually following the same schedule. Any affected employer subject to a city or county trip reduction ordinance which is at least as effective as this regulation in increasing average vehicle ridership (AVR) may be exempted from the requirements of this regulation. `ash 1501 - 1 (Adopted December 11, 1987) RULE 1502. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this regulation, the following definitions apply: (a) Alternative Transportation means the use of non-motor vehicle mod" of transportation. Walkiag and bicycling are examples. (b) Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) means the figure derived by dividing the employee population at a given worksite that reports to work weekdays between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. by the number of vehicles' driven by these employees commuting from home to the worksite during these hours. AVR may be calculated using weekly or biweekly averaging periods. The applicable employee population is multiplied by the n1imber of weekdays in the selected averaging period, then divided by the 1014, number of vehicles driven by these employees to the worksite during the some period. *Vehicles counted shall exclude bicycles, transit vehicles, buses serving multiple worksites, and cars stopping on route to other worksites. District-approved low pollution vehicles shall also be excluded. (c) Central City Area (CCA) means the Los Angeles City area bounded as described below: (1) by the Santa Monica Freeway (Route 10) from Union Avenue to Alameda Street; (2) Alameda Street from the Santa Monica Freeway to Sunset Boulevard; (5) Sunset Boulevard from Alameda Street to the Harbor Freeway (Route 110); (4) the Harbor Freeway from Sunset Boulevard to the Hollywood Freeway (Route 101); (5) the Hollywood Freeway to Temple Street; (6) Temple Street from Belmont Avenue to Union Avenue; and (7) Union Avenue from Temple Street to the Santa Monica Freeway. (d) Employee means any person employed by an employer as defined in Rule 1502(e). (a) Employer means any person, firm, business, educational institution, government agency, or other entity which employs 100 or more people at a single worksite as defined in Rule 1502(k). 1502 - I (Adopted December 11, 1987) RULE 1503. CONTROL OF INDIRECT SOURCES - INCREASEIN AVERAGE VEHICLE RIDERSHIP BY EMPLOYERS OF 100 OR MORE EMPLOYERS (a) The Executive Officer will begin sending written aotiees of the requirements Of this regulation to employers, as defined by Rule 1502(e), In accordance with the following schedule: July 1, 1988 employers who employ 500 or more persons at a worksite January I, 1989 employers who employ 200 or more persons at a worksite January 1, 1990 employers who employ 100 or more persona at ■ worksite Following written notice employers shall submit to the Executive Officer a trip reduction plan which shall meet the requirements of this regulation. The trip reduction plan shall be submitted within 90 days of the notice. (b) Submitted plans must specify the measures the employer will take to achieve the specified average vehicle ridership (AVR) for employee vehicles subject to the regulation. AVR targets are: 1.75 AVR in the Central City Area of Source Receptor Area 1; 1.5 AVR in Source Receptor Areas 1 (excluding the Central City Area), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, and 35; 1.3 AVR in Source Receptor Areas 13, 14, IS, 24, 25, 26, 27. 29, 29, 30, 31, 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40. (See Attachment I for locations of specific source/receptor areas.) (e) The plans shall be prepared by a trained transportation coordinator and shall include: (1) Designation of a trained transportation coordinator responsible for implementation of the plan. (2) An inventory of current measures used by the employer intended to achieve increases in Average Vehicle Ridership. 1503 - 1 \� (Adopted December 11, 1987) RULE 1504. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANS (a) The written notice specified in Rule 1503(a) shall be served personally, or by registered or certified mail- Each employer so served shall submit to the Executive Officer the plans and information described in the notice within 90 days after the receipt of the notice. In the event that the employer reasonably needs more time to prepare and submit a plan meeting the requirements of this regulation, additional time may be sought from the Executive Officer. Additional time may be granted for good "use, but such extensions shall only be effective if in writing, with a new submittal date specified. The Executive Officer shall notify the employer whether or not the extension has been granted within 15 days of receipt of request for extension. (b) After the employer submits the plan, the Executive Officer must either approve or disapprove the plan within 60 days. Notice of approval or disapproval shall be given by registered or certified mail. If the plan is disapproved, the reasons for disapproval shall be given in writing to the employer. Any plan disapproved by the Executive Officer must be revised by the employer and resubmitted to the Executive Officer within 30 days of the notice of disapproval, or the employer shall be deemed to be in violation of Rule 1504(f). It the employer believes that the plan meets the requirements of this regulation and that the plan was improperly disapproved, the employer may appeal the disapproval to the District Hearing Board. An appeal of a disapproval must be made within 10 days after the employer receives the notice of disapproval. (c) An approved plan may be revised between plan submittal dates by submitting a plan revision. The revision shall not be effective until approved by the Executive Officer. (d) Each employer must review its implementation of the plan, and update and resubmit the plan annually. The review shall focus on ridesharing and trip. reduction incentives offered by the employer. The review and update shall consist of a report that: (1) estimates AVR levels attained, (2) verifies that the plan incentives have been offered, (3) .describes use of those incentives offered by employers, (4) evaluates why the plan did or did not work, and an explanation of why the revised plan is likely to achieve the AVR target levels, (5) lists additional incentives which can reasonably be expected to correct deficiencies, and 1504 - 1 (Adopted December 11, 1937) RULE 1505. EXEMPTIONS (a) Any employer subject to a city or county ordinance which requires the implementation of trip reduction measures by that employer may be exempted from the requirements of this regulation. In order to obtain this exemption, the employer must make written application to the Executive Officer, and the Executive Officer must determine that the requirements of the ordinance are at least as effective as this regulation in increasing AVR at the employer's worksite. The written application must be made within 30 days after initially receipt and notice from the Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 1503, or within 30 days after receiving notice of an annual review and update. (b) In order to maintain this exemption, the employer shall submit an annual report to the Executive Officer describing the trip reduction incentives being offered and the actual AVR levels achieved at the employer's worksite. The Executive Officer may make the exemption conditional upon maintaining a specified AVR level at the worksite, and may revoke the exemption at such time as he determines that the specified AVR level is not being maintained. In the event that the city or county ordinance under which the employer qualified for the exemption is amended or rescinded, the exemption is void and the employer must reapply for an exemption within 60 days of the date of amendment or rescission. 1505 - 1 tVlO JRING, FORECASTING AND REPORTING AIR QUALII Y \39 13 _ 15B �r . - '�-s _-i l . All l - ' y 36 _ ' r— �Y .22 0• :4/may ..,. /� 110 l i `` 1 - g - 19 ' : . 1' 28 SOITR COMM r [ A M •/10 25 (/ IMP WM-1 Y MMAGEMIMT DISTRKT _W LL (J/ SW11Cf RECEPTOR AREAS 1 / 6 • ~ ImIVWWI..m to Wl.bOlm lu..PElf.Orf\/IRJIo..IO Ert YIpd lO n..f.11.1! rnf oOl.:nll ru.I.Oo ys. phxamo e.fa"W...am lM..O MM.Ia/1Rvtw ...iOp.aultn,eian rtm/n,..w.Iur..t,111IW e.f .I[Y rw ro.1..l rol.fl.I1W.ml m,PI. , IMu.....tnr.p.m.mI{4.t.m.Oluu IUY..,..I.IIIurt u1WIIDQ 1.�nMb I.o.1. TM .rt u..mpmlly b. ro,l.pnilauY...m o...m.IM.iriW lw..ws- mw.n.,.ulion.m.,MbwIm Y1111.mIw r..m lmsPw.Iu.ms cloa.Ilro.ilw..t lapel .m ., p.lh.io. tlrr.tt.ririq ukiy Imo .cowl ty,Ic.l .im MMmr. wllonwtl.[ni,n...loer,.n..r 4md mowYl bo.eo.,b.mlr.m rMr IMtuml..Iuie W.., An.veor.miA.r 1n.M,.e w I.,Rn.Dirti..rtpw.i.u.r a,bm y rs.I.m . wP.I.il.m w by b rms MW Man M. FwI PWIk -C.rml Lw Al -Am I:' A.O.bl1m1 Valk,-Amm Va"m rmh- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA May 18, 1989 1® EWSAWE GO.BOY 812] .� EgIMNN VY1FY.LLLIEOPNL 92]2BA12] nlaesz4411 Status Report and Approval of Actions Regarding Pen Permit to Construct for 60 MGD Primary Treatment Expansion at Reclamation Plant No. 1 At the Committee's April meeting the members discussed at considerable length the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) evolving requirements for obtaining Permit to Construct (PTC) the next master-planned Increment of primary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. In order to provide the required data for the SCAQMD permit processing, considerable outside technical assistance and specialized consulting services are needed. To ensure that the required technical data is developed in a timely manner to keep this important project on schedule and avoid any further permit processing delays, the Committee recommended and the Joint Boards approved on May loth, an action authorizing the Executive Committee to approve for execution by the General Manager, agreements for specialized professional consulting services; testing and analytical services; procurement of materials, equipment and services for installation and operation of facilities for pilot scale testing; and acquisition of air emission credits pursuant to new source review regulations. These are necessary to comply with SCAQMD requirements for the proposed 60 mgd primary treatment expansion of Reclamation Plant No. 1. The permit to construct must be received from SCAQMD prior to the start of construction. Several recent meetings have been held between representatives of the SCAQMD and the Sanitation Districts (CSDOC). The meetings have been most productive and a schedule has been jointly developed between SCAQMD and CSDOC for resolution of the remaining issues. Staff has been able to engage the necessary technical assistance required to date within its procurement authority ($25,000). The staffs actions are listed for ratification by the Committee along with the authorizations requested of the Committee so that the Directors can determine the total effort required. Preparation of Health Risk Assessment. In April the Directors authorized the hiring of Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $95,000 to assist in the acquiring the PTC from SCAQMD including the preparation of the necessary health risk assessment. SCAQMD, CSDOC and Malcolm Pirnie have had several meetings regarding the computer model and work is underway utilizing "dummy" toxic volatile organic compounds (VOC) values. Independently, CSDOC, with assistance from Malcolm Pirnie, has gathered samples from various plant processes which will be analyzed and when that analysis is complete, the values will be input to the computer model in place of the "dummy" numbers allowing completion of the health risk assessment. Staff schedules call for submitting the complete health risk assessment to SCAQMD prior to June 1, 1989. -1- Recommended Actions: It has been necessary to engage the services of several firms to assist to completing the health risk assessment. Accordingly, the following actions by the Executive Committee are recommended: 1. Ratify staff action of issuing a purchase order to Dorado Enterprises In an amount not to exceed $5,000, for fabrication of enclosures over certain plant facilities to enable gathering of air samples. 2. Ratify staff action of issuing a purchase order to VOC, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $15,000, for gathering samples in accordance with SCAQMD protocol , delivered the samples to a laboratory for analysis and preparation of final analytical report. 3. Ratify staff action of issuing a purchase order to Del Mar Analytical In an amount not to exceed $10,000.00 for laboratory analytical analysis of air samples. > Purchase of Offsite Emission Credits. Preliminary screening analyses indicated that procurement o additional VOC (non-methane hydrocarbons) emission credits are necessary for this project. As the Directors are aware, the SCAQMD Board is considering an amendment to the New Source Review rules that would exempt POTW's from the requirement to acquire offset emission credits under certain circumstances. However, the change would not occur for five months at the earliest. Such a delay would be more costly to the project from construction inflation ($200,000 per month) than the estimated price of purchasing the credits ($673,750 - see below). The exact amount of the required credits has not yet been quantified; however, the credits must be obtained prior to issuance of the required public notice by SCAQMD. Staff has engaged Carleton Engineers to assist in locating and evaluating emission credits. A local company, Kimstock, Inc. of Santa Ana, is offering emissions credits for sale, and staff and Counsel have negotiated with Kimstock for the purchase of 100 tons per year (550 pounds per day) of Kimstock credits have been certified by SCAQMD and can be immediately transferred to CSDOC upon approval of a purchase agreement. This 1s of considerable benefit to the Districts. Recommended Actions: 1. Ratify staff action in issuing a purchase order to Carleton Engineers in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for assistance in locating, evaluating and permitting offsite emission credits and related assistance for Job No. P1-33. 2. Approve a purchase agreement with Kimstock in an amount not to exceed $673,750 for 550 pounds per day of VOC credits, and authorize the General Manager to sign said agreement in a form meeting General Counsel 's approval. Issuance of Public Notice. The SCAQMD staff are drafting a public notice concurren w th the preparation of the health risk assessment and quantification of the VOCS. If staff delivers the health risk assessment -2- to SCAQMD by June 1, SCAQMD has indicated they will authorize mail-out of the required public notice to residents surrounding the Fountain Valley plant (within a one-quarter mile radius of the plant perimeter) by mid-June. The actual mailing by the notice will be done by CSDOC. Recommended Actions: Ratify staff action in issuing a purchase order to Towne Advertisers Mailing Service in an amount not to exceed $7,000 for preparation of the mailer including postage for the required SCAQMD public notice. ° VOC Reduction Demonstration Project. When SCAQMD issues the PTC, one of the conditions will be a VOC reduction demonstration project. CSDOC has prepared a proposal for such a project and submitted an application to SCAQMD for a PTC the demonstration project. The project will include a small pilot wet scrubber (50 cfm) using various chemicals to measure VOC reduction. Those chemicals and operational modes most successful will be modeled in a second, larger scrubber (500 cfm). The results will be submitted to SCAQMD. Depending on the outcome of the demonstration project, the District may have to modify the existing wet scrubber system to reduce VOCs. The cost of the demonstration project is not yet known, since the amount of testing has not been determined. Recommended Actions: None at this time. Once the SCAQMD requirements are better defined staff will advise the Committee at a future meeting. Future Approval of Final Plan and Specifications and Other Related Actions. The final plans and specifications will be submitted to the full Boards at the regular meeting on June 14, 1989 for approval and authorization to receive construction bids, subject to receipt of the PTC from SCAQMD. Also requested will be authorization for staff and General Counsel to proceed with condemnation of an easement from Southern California Edison (SCE) necessary for the outlet pipe southeasterly of the Plant 1 boundary at Garfield Street and the Santa Ana River. Although staff and counsel believe that easement negotiations with SCE will be successful , and may preclude the need for use of eminent domain, approval of an order of immediate possession 1s recommended so that the project will not be delayed if easement negotiations break down. Other recommended actions in June will include authorization for the Selection Committee to negotiate an addendum to the design contract with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers to include any necessary last-minute design changes required to comply with forthcoming SCAQMD requirements that are outside the scope of the original design contract. -3- Schedule for Receipt of PTC and Award of Construction Contract for Job PI-33. At the close of the public comment period in mid-July staff will finalize plans and specifications (assuming no major obstacles are uncovered). Plans and specifications would then go on sale the day the PTC is received. The plan described above should lead to the issuance of the PTC on or before August 17, 1989. It is anticipated that bids for this $40 million project will be received in September, 1989, with award of a contract scheduled for the regular meeting in October 1989. If the project proceeds on this schedule, it will be operational prior to the winter of 1992-93. -4- RESOLUTION NO. 89-56 AMENDING RULES OF PROCEDURE RESOLUTION NO. 87-51 RE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-51 ESTABLISHING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF THE DISTRICTS RE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP WHEREAS, Resolution No. 87-51 established rules of procedure to facilitate the orderly handling of business to come before the Joint Administrative Organization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California; and, WHEREAS, these Boards deem it desirable and appropriate to amend said rules of procedure relative to membership of the Executive Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1. That Section 13.(a) of Resolution No. 87-51, establishing rules of procedure for the conduct of business of the Districts, be amended to read as follows: 13. STANDING COMMITTEES: (a) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - There shall be a permanent Committee designated as the Executive Committee which shall consist of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of each District, or other District Director as designated by the Chairman, the Directors who represent the Orange County Board of Supervisors, and the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. Each past Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall also serve as a member of the Executive Committee, provided that said person serves as an active Director of a District Board. Any person designated as an alternate member of the Executive Committee must be an elected official of the same District as the regular Executive Committee member. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be the Chairman of the Executive Committee. The Committee may fix a regular meeting time and place or may meet at the call of the Chairman. The Committee may consider any matters related to the joint ownership, operation and construction of all the Districts and make recommendations thereon to the Joint Boards of Directors of the Districts." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1989-90 JOINT WORKS BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE P SITATION — =may �'e to4olitan Ofo OIST'f' 0 U m N fq = K S'nce 195t+ OggNGE COVE _ MAY 24, 1989 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS r. W ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA May 24, 1989 1084 Ears AVENUE _ vo.BOX 8127 i(WWN V4 EY,GIBOBNIA 92728.8127 UU18822411 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Boards of Directors FROM: Executive Committee SUBJECT: Summary Report and Recommendations re 1989-90 Joint Works Budgets (Personnel , Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund) y Recommendation The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee recommendation to adopt the enclosed 1989-90 Joint Works Personnel , Operating and Construction Budgets. Summary Report The accompanying budget documents provide detailed information concerning the proposed Joint Works budgets. The following discussion highlights and summarizes the recommendations for the three elements of the Joint Works budgets. r Personnel (See Blue Report) New Positions - - Summary: Staff has previously advised the Directors that major treatment plant expansion underway and new program implementation to comply with changing regulatory requirements would require significant staffing increases to operate and maintain the new facilities and to support related activities and other required programs. Over these past few years we have completed and placed into service $43.5 million of new plant facilities and equipment. We currently have A.. $105 million in new treatment plant facilities under construction that will be placed into service during the 1989-90 budget year; and $31 million in individual District facilities under construction. An additional $195 million in treatment facilities and $55 million in collection facilities are under design and will be constructed and placed into service over the next few years. The 30-year Master Plan now being considered by the Boards recommends additional major facilities. This year our various departments requested 70 new positions. The General Manager has reviewed these requests with the Department Heads and is recommending that the Directors authorize 41 new positions in 1989-90. Many of these positions will not be filled until later in the year, and some may not be filled at all if completion of construction projects is delayed. Four of the 41 positions are part-time. The recommended positions are in support of a variety of programs as summarized in the following table: i Memo to Boards of Directors Page Two May 24, 1989 u Summary of Additional Staffing Requests Program/System Positions it Finance and Management i Support Services (Accounting, Purchasing, 6 u Warehousing, MIS/EDP) Risk Management/Safety Engineering 1 V Operations and Maintenance Odor Control and Air Scrubbing Systems 2 y Sewage Collection Systems - 2 General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 4 Technical Services Regulatory Compliance 4 Source Control Program 5 Process Monitoring & Laboratory 2 Engineering u Facilities Planning & Design 5 Construction Management 10 u Total 41 I ' u The recommended new positions would raise the authorized staffing level from 497 to 538, an increase of approximately 8%. Annual Cost Based on the anticipated need to fill the new positions over the course of the next year, the recommendations would add $1,191,689, approximately 6.5%, to the Fiscal Year 1989-90 salary budget. The maximum future annual salary cost assuming all positions are filled at the top step is $1,489,260. An additional i . 27% would be added to the total to reflect the costs of employee benefits paid by the Districts, including retirement, health, life and disability insurance, workers compensation, unemployment insurance and uniforms. W Pending Classification/Organizational Studies The three-year memoranda of understanding (MOUs) which were,approved by the Boards for the period from November 1987 through November 1990 contained provisions for certain classification studies. These studies are now underway I u r Memo to Boards of Directors May 24, 1989 Page Three r by two outside consulting firms and are expected to be completed by early 1989-90. It is anticipated that modifications will be recommended to some existing classifications and salary ranges. The classifications being studied are: Unit Classifications r Administration & Clerical All except Warehouse classes Operations & Maintenance Plant Maintenance Division Four Specialized Sr. Plant Operators Control Center Clerks Technical Services Laboratory Division Compliance Division Lead Industrial Waste Inspectors Engineering None The Districts have several projects under various stages of development or construction to improve security at the plants. Many of these projects will be completed during the next year. As part of this effort we are evaluating the need for security personnel , primarily to monitor and to control access at the �+ entry gates. Upon completion of the study next fiscal year, a recommendation will be submitted to the Boards on the staffing requirements for this needed function. r We are also proposing an organizational study over the next year to determine the need and place in the organization for a customer service type of division. Soon all Districts (but No. 14) will have implemented supplemental user fee r° programs and it is expected that this division would be responsible for administering the user fee program (now in six Districts), and the large industrial/commercial user fee program in all Districts. r Staff will return to the Boards with a specific recommendations as the studies are completed. There is no appropriation in the 1989-90 budget for any changes that might be forthcoming from the recommendations. However, any budgetary increases could be funded from payroll savings or reserves. The following summarizes the personnel/staffing recommendations: r Management Department Personnel Office: A Risk and Safety Manager position is recommended to administer all risk management activities including group medical plan coordination, workers compensation, liability and property insurance and to expand the existing safety program. , Finance Department r - Accounting: An additional Accounting Technician position is recommended to assist with accounts receivable and accounts and contracts payable and to provide needed back-up and relief in other accounting areas. r i W Memo to Boards of Directors May 24, 1989 i.. Page Four - Warehousing: A Senior Storeskeeper position is recommended to assume leadman duties as the Plant No. 2 warehouse expands and completes the transition from a satellite facility. W - Information Services: This Division was formed last year and minor reorganization and expansion is now recommended. The existing W Programmer/Analyst is recommended for an upgrade to Information Services Specialist and the existing position is recommended to be down-rated to better reflect responsibilities. One additional Programmer and two i additional Information Services Technician II positions are recommended to �+ provide repair, maintenance and support services required by our expanding use of computers. W Operations and Maintenance Department - Plant Maintenance: This Division is requesting a new Foreman position to be responsible for groundskeeping and landscaping crews and for outside contractors. Three additional Helper positions are recommended to provide painting, groundskeeping, digester and general maintenance and ,janitorial I ' services throughout the plants. W - Collection Facilities: One Collection Facilities Worker II and one Collection Facilitiei Worker I positions are recommended to supplement existing crews as several new interceptor sewers are nearing completion and will be placed into service soon. - Mechanical Maintenance: One Lead Mechanic position is recommended to W upgrade the off hours, weekend or swing shift, preventive maintenance program and an additional Mechanic is recommended primarily for the new odor control facilities that will be operational next year at both plants. ■, Technical Services Department I ' - Compliance: A new classification of Compliance Supervisor is recommended W to reflect a reorganization of this Division and to provide supervision for the quality assurance/quality control section and for the marine I ' monitoring/marine science section, allowing the deletion of two Principal W Environmental Specialist positions. The air quality section is proposed to be supervised by a new Engineer position which will allow the deletion of an Associate Engineer position. One additional Environmental y Specialist III and three additional Environmental Specialist II positions are requested to support the ongoing quality assurance/quality control work, the marine studies program, the air quality program and to improve District-wide sampling, analysis and evaluation. - Laboratory: A salary range increase is recommended for three vacant aboratory Supervisor positions to more adequately reflect supervisory W responsibilities in the three Laboratory sections. An additional Principal Lab Analyst is recommended for mid-year to operate a new i $300,000 gas chromatograph/mass spectrophotometer. The transfer of some quality assurance/quality control work to the Compliance Division r Memo to Boards of Directors May 24, 1989 Page Five r will allow deletion of two Senior Lab Analyst positions. One entry level Lab Analyst I position and two additional Part-time Assistant positions .d are also recommended. - Source Control : A new Engineer position is recommended to assume supervisory responsibility in the enforcement section, to develop overall enforcement strategies and procedures and to provide technical supervision. Two Assistant Engineer positions are recommended to work in the enforcement and pretreatment sections. Expansion of the monitoring and enforcement programs will require three additional Industrial Waste Inspector positions. d Engineering Department - Director of Engineering: All of the clerical staff for the Engineering Department is budgeted in this office and an additional Senior Steno Clerk .. position is recommended for the increasing work load. - Plannin and Desi n: The 30-year Master Plan being considered by the trec ors points out the need for many new facilities in the future. Accordingly five new positions are recommended for this Division to provide project leadership and to allow development of the professional staff. These positions are an Engineer, an Associate Engineer, an .. Assistant Engineer, an Engineering Aide II and a Part-time Assistant. - Construction Management: Project management and construction inspection needs are also project ea to increase in the future. An Engineer, a Principal Construction Inspector, a Senior Construction Inspector and four Construction Inspector positions are recommended to accommodate this workload and to decrease our dependence on outside consultants. An Engineering Aide III and a Part-time Assistant are also recommended to provide needed support to the engineering and inspection staff. r Projected Payroll Cost - The full employment payroll estimate is $26.6 million, but we expect to realize a payroll savings of approximately 10% due to personnel turnover, delays in filling new positions, tight control over hiring activities, temporary adjustments in plant operation schedules and procedures to minimize staffing, and delays in major construction schedules. Our total —' payroll cost is therefore targeted at $23.7 million. - Net payroll and benefits, after chargeouts to CORF and the Districts, ,d account for approximately 40% of the total budgeted Joint Operating Costs. - The actual payroll savings may be affected by pending classification and organizational studies previously discussed as there are no provisions in r the budget for any changes that might be forthcoming from those studies. Any proposed changes will be considered by the full Board prior to implementation. r i W Memo to Boards of Directors May 24, 1989 �+ Page Six JOINT OPERATING BUDGET - JO (Green Report) - The $44.53 million Joint Operating budget finances the operating and W maintenance costs of the joint treatment works and the joint administrative activities. W - The major factors that are causing increases in our Joint Works operating and maintenance costs include: - Regulatory Requirements: more stringent air pollution control requirements mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) for control and reduction of hydrogen sulfide (H2S), oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and oxides of sulfur (SOx) emissions, u resulting in significantly higher chemical costs to remove pollutants from the digester gas produced in our treatment plants and control emissions from our digester gas-fired engines. - increased casts for engineering, monitoring, enforcement, outside and in-house laboratory services and special project activities carried out by the Compliance, Laboratory and Source Control staffs to comply with the ocean monitoring and pretreatment program provisions of our NPDES permit as well as our AQMD permit requirements - increased costs for use of higher volumes of chemicals such as ferric chloride and anionic polymer used in our physical/chemical treatment systems to improve solids removal efficiencies as required to maintain compliance with the discharge limits set forth in our NPDES permit - Sludge Disposal: a proposed 50% increase in tipping fees effective July i, 1989 at the Coyote Canyon landfill , as well as increased costs W for hauling and disposal in a private landfill of waste-activated sludge and grit and screenings which the Regional Water Quality Control � Board has determined cannot be disposed of at the Coyote Canyon landfill ; and higher costs for private reuse alternatives to landfill disposal - Odor Control : increased chemical usage for expanded odor control program including 20 new foul air scrubbers as well as increases in the unit cost of caustic soda - Repairs and Maintenance: increased maintenance and repair activities y throughout the Distn cts' expanded and upgraded treatment facilities - Comparison with 1988-89 Budget: The accompanying excerpt from Schedule A y of the Joint Operating-Budget (Green Report) highlights the comparisons between the proposed 1989-90 budget and last year's budget and also 1 summarizes the reasons for the increases (and decreases) by major budget category. - Increase Over 1988-89 Budget: The $5.6 million increase is 14.5% over the 1988-89 budget. Of this, 8.8% (or more than 60% of the increase) is r, directly attributable to regulatory mandates such as improved wastewater treatment and AQMD regulations requiring significant improvements in �.I Memo to Boards of Directors May 24, 1989 Page Seven control of air emissions, and increased costs for chemicals, as well as the ocean monitoring, pretreatment and toxics control requirements set forth in our NPDES permit. The remaining portion of the increase, or about 5.7% (40% of the increase) is due to inflation-related increases in the costs of operating and maintaining expanded facilities and to accommodate additional flows into our treatment facilities. r Self-Funded Insurance Plans The Districts have been self-insured for several types of coverage for the last eleven years as a result of Fiscal Policy Committee recommendations that were implemented by the Joint Boards of Directors. Workers' Compensation and Public Liability - The Workers' Compensation and Public Liability plans have been in existence since 1979. - The savings realized through these self-insured plans plus in-lieu premiums deposited and interest earnings on the reserves in these funds have resulted in a current reserve level of $2.3 million, compared to the original $500,000 reserve level set by the Boards when the plans were established. The Committee recommends that the reserve level proposed for —' 1989-90 for the Workers' Compensation fund be maintained and the reserve level in the fully self-insured Public Liability Fund be increased to $1.7 million. - An appropriation of $155,000 for in-lieu premium contributions by the Districts is recommended in the Workers' Compensation Fund to maintain the existing reserve level at $699,000. - A $265,000 appropriation has been included in the Public Liability Fund for excess loss insurance in the event the current study and the potential availability of this coverage is deemed desirable by the Directors. - The Fiscal Policy Committee is again recommending that the Boards of the individual Districts continue the practice of setting aside reserve funds to partially cover deductible levels for the Districts' all-risk property insurance coverage. The reserves are recommended to increase an additional $1 million to the $5 million level for 1989-90. Health Plan (Schedule VII, Goldenrod) r - The Self-funded Employee Health Plan has been in existence for the past ten years. Our claims experience in 1988-89 appears to indicate that the cost containment provisions enacted in 1984, which include both increased deductible requirements and co-payment levels, have been somewhat effective r W Memo to Boards of Directors May 24, 1989 �+ Page Eight W in helping to stabilize our claims levels on a per-employee basis. Although total costs have increased in response to continuing increases in the total numbers of active employees, their dependents, and retired employees participating in the plan, the cost per employee covered has decreased. - These increased total medical care costs required transfers into this fund during the past year over and above the anticipated premiums. However, we have partially recovered some of these expenditures from increased premiums paid by employees for family coverage. Staff expects that the increased Districts' and employees contribution level authorized by the Boards during approval of the salary and benefits agreements negotiated with the employee groups in 1987-88 will also reduce any required transfers in 1989-90. We expect these changes, and new cost containment provisions that are also W included, will enable this fund to be self-supporting by the end of the three-year MOU period. Budgeted District premiums are equal to premiums approved for the HMO plans. `+ - Disability payments for short and long-term disability were unusually high in 1988-89. There is a two-year limit for long-term disability payments and this expense is expected to decrease over the next two years. CORF BUDGET (Yellow Report) - Summary: The $102.7 million Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) Budget finances the construction of the Joint Treatment Works Facilities. It includes major and minor projects which have generally been previously presented to the Boards for review as part of the Master Plan and/or W agenda process. Any project under $15,000 requires informal bidding. Projects over $15,000 require formal bidding, and any projects over $25,000 require Board approval in accordance with District procurement W regulations. The budget is prepared under Scenario 2 assumptions included in the 30-year Master Plan now under consideration by the Directors. i - Source of funds: The budget will be financed from existing capital funds accumulated in the individual Districts' Capital Facilities Funds, proceeds from the 1986 sale of Certificates of Participation, new connection fees and from limited Federal and State grant funds. 4' - Master-Planned Projects: The 1989-90 CORF requirements total T102,725'000, an increase of $7,745,000 over 1988-89. The budget u includes funds for several major master-planned projects, including completing the construction of the new headworks at Plant 1, the new outfall booster station at Plant 2. Also included are the central power W generation facilities at both plants, and additional primary treatment and sludge handling facilities at Plant 1, completion of a new plant entrance, interior circulation roads, expansion of the administration building and the construction of a new central laboratory. - Proiect Categorization: Schedule B-2 entitled Classification of Budgeted Projects by Revenue Program Categories classifies all the proposed y 1989-90 capital outlay projects into three categories to assist the W Memo to Boards of Directors May 24, 1989 Page Nine V Directors in evaluating the need for the proposed levels of expenditures. These categories are: - Replacement/Reconstruction Projects - These projects are required to replace ar rehabil to a agi—ng�teriorated equipment or structures. - Improvement/Upgrade Projects - These projects are mandated by various regulatory agencies, including the EPA, State-Regional Water Quality Control Boards, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and other local agencies. - Additional Capacity/Increased Hydraulic Requirements Projects - These projects are requ red to accommodate increase hydraulic requirements (additional flows) that the Joint Works facilities must process and dispose of over the next five to ten years, as identified in the latest Joint Works Master Plan. The $102,725,000 in proposed CORF projects is allocated to these three categories as follows: Project Category 1989-90 Budget Allocation Replacement/Reconstruction $ 37,658,000 V Improvement/Upgrade 6,415,000 Increased Hydraulic Requirements 58,652,000 Total 1989-90 CORF Budget Request $102,725,000 The staff is available to answer any questions from the Directors. If you desire V additional information before the meeting, please contact Wayne Sylvester or Gary Streed at (714) 962-2411. r r V ' r. r IYFn JOIn OYdlln flPD WRF flNylE A Ytlln Mont"6 I.Min to'lM1Y n.Yp<m BYOFI IImEt1EXA M. Ylnn 0) U) Im (0) (E) rcnfx Ilyn. IW-n M I. in qu w. roGl EYGM In&Y mqn IHnol. la nni vimmm wfx vpbtl m.v<itltl �ry � y<DiWtlu E4WIm � Inn.x Iglaffrrf0<eruml 1. Mt LI<H r.Yyn t tI5,4tl,W] El].Y].YO E MAN Ilm',. U.M.- Lp[t m-I-'-1g1erW.t 1-1 no m n1 DI pintq GMrl W .1. rlltlnul EI Wltluul pltttw rlll G Yff<D In uu W y<r p11Mll Y P{pM1 I—no"npltmrr Dogl 1.eHlutlr,.1.10 MIf r .Iy IwGllp.1r W pW.11,MImHq<ulYut W pilr.W r mnwmin oo,.IGIWIq u+GfOony amr mifnl W pH.11 G..W.Gun oMgr. -I gplr.M Irvn W YOI M- -I.M1tlr�t nqN.Glp"It .t p.Hlnll Wnlu Ill qnm nG raNHlm s1 YL ImgW f. Wr Wtgl stMul f.lY,pV O.Y).QO 2E1.000 M.. EY,DY DWle.l jWrvfpj Nron.O.—ur fxmWfOgia.fH qI n nlarlw NW.[WI Uaq.iergftl E)br<t. I .1.. net plu burl.or Ili mpfp ux H W<]IIMxf prlq mvNs[lu. .aft ENt nl.no I.-Mr.1.ulmq W WNmYI (linos IUugfb) lost <Ir u/Lqf. ppryy)Dfgru G eb m Ilmi 1 no G Im4.1 Abrw xnlb l Gum n wr m wGnt rl W. Ibbgn v.MM (Y,tltl> (Jun elfmttlnq. ,.I YI.Hb In.Ym mewl.gift.In HE.mr D.l(AMP NI.mewl r.T<YeHla IY.M t—W pgwlbMlpl wlrY In, A.utl priory<Ixlnx W.—. Alm uW fp Alflb... PoIrWf ol,m— Ufp.lnorw.f rlq Ion— J.... 1. FNgflwl t mn4xt LIM.M I...OY .Y.DY EG.M pt.lpp -Dq GYrM M re.G i Mpn r.nlm I. mllb 1-1 E Olmful .,mD.M s.W.Wtl .n,nl W,M I,IY.nI -Iulgf.lA Inblll 11n1.1- -I-1.CI<pul x.n fp Drinu....I ptlw on. Iault 01 Avon.mY1nGu p u nIo L Erlywt Wrpu In.nO fY,RO N.DY ol'. -lip..<.In w.f Mq Igllont. 0. INl rf]Iu111WIn0 i1Y.. f.nl.m W.w I... M.Ml J Ido M1r most..1.W r.p.1n In q.IM W yqW Sq<Inr/rupllr I.I"Itlp W..mw.l 4ipnt 1. trgM t.l... 2.201 t.DA,tln Ilw.., un,WI -0igf.W G tl.Nir H n I011ltlu 1.qmn dIIMN ImMM.G il,W.' On"..mpl W Hrqu rnl I.— e. YNlur e.oY.tln 1.IDl.mo F0.01 eY.DY I.... -Iu1gf..Y 111.enrN pHq IMgq yr Dqt IWIq W.W .mt,.)uN4.n W IwWG Gmww. D. YGrww.l..supp". I.... I.MAN M.M In.YD En.6C -I...In WGR olu<uf.GrtW Wlpnl tllwpf. -sq.twr rer q0 Druid.w pa.up fq.. ID. GGe blq(gr.Hq W.Y].rm Ye.niem Y.Ya.M n.Ns.WO IO.In.Yo Ipnl.. Il. trvWq W YfrH. I IY IDO On. . On n. wt blot gr<tlq lY.Y].tt0 Ir.Y1.Yr SI.II..YI Y.IA.M n.W.nD Ppnx< COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PERSONNEL _ RECOMMENDATIONS PN0TATION `to4alitan O �l O O Snce 19sk +l �gNGE CO�N� 1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10AAA ELLIS AVENUE May 1 1989 vo.eox E127 y , FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 71419624411 MEMORANDUM TO: Boards of Directors SUBJECT: Recommended Personnel and Organizational Changes for Fiscal Year 1989-90 BACKGROUND During the annual budget preparation process the staff evaluates personnel requirements for the upcoming fiscal year. This review of staffing needs takes into consideration anticipated new programs, the start-up of new facilities and the ongoing maintenance and operation of the existing Joint Works Treatment Facilities and the individual District's collection systems. Staff recommendations for the 1989-90 fiscal year are contained in this report. _ SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff has previously advised the Directors that major treatment plant expansion underway and new program implementation to comply with changing regulatory .. requirements would require significant staffing increases to operate and maintain the new facilities and to support related activities and other required programs. Over these past few years we have completed and placed into service $43.5 million of new plant facilities and equipment. We currently have $105 million in new treatment plant facilities under construction that will be placed into service during the 1989-90 budget year; and $31 million in individual District facilities under construction. An additional $195 million in treatment facilities and $55 million in collection facilities are under design and will be constructed and placed into service over the next few years. The 30-year Master Plan now being considered by the Boards recommends additional major facilities. This year our various departments requested 70 new positions. The General Manager has reviewed these requests with the Department Heads and is recommending that the Directors authorize 41 new positions in 1989-90. Many of these positions will not be filled until later in the year, and some may not be filled at all if completion of construction projects is delayed. Four of the 41 positions are part-time. The recommended positions are in support of a variety of programs as summarized in the following table: Summary of Additional Staffing Requests Program/System Positions Finance and Management Support Services (Accounting, Purchasing, 6 Warehousing, MIS/EDP) Risk Management/Safety Engineering 1 Operations and Maintenance r Odor Control and Air Scrubbing Systems 2 Sewage Collection Systems 2 General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 4 Technical Services Regulatory Compliance 4 Source Control Program 5 Process Monitoring & Laboratory 2 Engineering Facilities Planning & Design 5 Construction Management 10 Total 41 The recommended new positions would raise the authorized staffing level from 497 to 538, an increase of approximately 8%. ANNUAL COST • Based on the anticipated need to fill the new positions over the course of the next year, the recommendations would add $1,191,689, approximately 6.5%, to the ., Fiscal Year 1989-90 salary budget. The total net salary cost of the proposed organizational changes and classification adjustments detailed in this report for both next year and future years, when all positions are eventually filled, is summarized on a departmental basis as follows: Department Net Cost of Salary Changes r 1989-90 Future Maximum Management $ 45,423 $ 60,564 Finance 154,989 215,688 Operations & Maintenance 186,720 213,408 Technical Services 287,075 424,956 Engineering 517,482 574,644 Total $1,191,689 $1,489,260 s An additional 27% would be added to the total to reflect the costs of employee benefits paid by the Districts, including retirement, health, life and disability insurance, workers compensation, unemployment insurance and uniforms. _2- r PENDING CLASSIFICATION/ORGANIZATIONAL STUDIES The three-year memoranda of understanding (MOUs) which were approved by the Boards for the period from November 1987 through November 1990 contained -- provisions for certain classification studies. These studies are now underway by two outside consulting firms and are expected to be completed by early 1989-90. It is anticipated that modifications will be recommended to some existing classifications and salary ranges. The classifications being studied are: Unit Classifications Administration & Clerical All except Warehouse classes Operations & Maintenance Plant Maintenance Division Four Specialized Sr. Plant Operators Control Center Clerks Technical Services Laboratory Division Compliance Division Lead Industrial Waste Inspectors Engineering None _ The Districts have several projects under various stages of development or construction to improve security at the plants. Many of these projects will be completed during the next year. As part of this effort we are evaluating the need for security personnel , primarily to monitor and to control access at the entry gates. Upon completion of the study next fiscal year, a recommendation will be submitted to the Boards on the staffing requirements for this needed function. We are also proposing an organizational study over the next year to determine the need and place in the organization for a customer service type of division. Soon all Districts (but No. 14) will have implemented supplemental user fee programs and it is expected that this division would be responsible for _ administering the user fee program (now in six Districts) , and the large industrial/commercial user fee program in all Districts. Staff will return to the Boards with a specific recommendations as the studies are completed. There is no appropriation in the 1989-90 budget for any changes that might be forthcoming from the recommendations. However, any budgetary increases could be funded from payroll savings or reserves. DISCUSSION OF RECOMMENDED STAFFING INCREASES The following discussion provides a summary explanation of the recommended changes for 1989-90, the cost of which is detailed by organizational unit in Exhibit A, and by position classification in Exhibit B. We have also included revised organizational charts reflecting the changes. MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT The Management Department includes the General Manager's Office, the Board Secretary's office, the Public Information Office, the Management Support Office, - and the Personnel and Safety Office. Nineteen positions are currently authorized in this department. r 3- 2150 - Personnel and Safety Office In addition to the general personnel functions of recruiting, administering benefits and managing MOUs with employee groups, our Personnel Office is also responsible for the Districts' safety program. A Risk and Safety Manager ($3883 - $5047) is recommended to administer all risk management activities including group medical plan coordination, workers compensation, liability and property insurance, and to expand the safety program which currently includes one employee and intermittent use of an outside consultant. FINANCE DEPARTMENT The Administration and Finance Department includes the Director of Finance's • Office, the Accounting Division, the Purchasing and Warehouse Division and the Information Services Division. Forty positions are currently authorized in this department. .� 2210 - Director of Finance's Office No changes are currently recommended in this office. 2220 - Accounting Division r An additional Accounting Technician ($1848 - $2301) position is recommended for this division. This position will assist with accounts - receivable and accounts payable and will provide needed back-up in other .. accounting functions. 2230 Purchasing and Warehouse Division .t The addition of a Senior Storeskeeper ($2239 - $2788) position is recommended to assume the leadman duties at the Plant No. 2 warehouse. This facility has become more active and has changed from a satellite + operation to a full service warehouse which requires first line supervision. A new, larger warehousing facility will be built at Plant 2 next year. ., 2240 - Information Services Division This division was added in the 1988-89 budget to coordinate and maximize r utilization of computerization in all Departments. The division has been effective in reducing our reliance on consultants and is in constant demand for problem solving and implementation of management information .. systems. Our existing Programmer/Analyst is recommended for an upgrade to an Information Services Specialist ($3565 - $4635) position which is more w commensurate with the duties. The existing Programmer/Analyst position is then recommended to be r down-rated following the above reclassification. The new range ($3241 - $4036) will fall midway between Programmer and Information Services Specialist, better reflecting the respective responsibilities .� and a more balanced organizational structure. r -4- r An additional Programmer ($2603 - $3241) is recommended to keep up with demand for program modifications, especially in the areas of plant process monitoring and compliance. These programmers assist all divisions with database management software. Two Information Services Technician II ($2208 - $2750) positions are recommended to provide technical and repair service for the many computers and computerized equipment in use. These positions are also responsible for providing expertise and assistance with many specialized software applications, such as desktop publishing and in-house graphic presentations. .. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT The Operations and Maintenance Department is responsible for the day-to-day, ongoing operations and maintenance of the Joint Works Treatment Facilities and the individual Districts collection systems. There are 323 authorized positions In the department which consists of the following seven divisions: 3310 - General Superintendent's Office - No changes are currently recommended in this office. 3330 - Plant Maintenance The Plant Maintenance Division is responsible for digester cleaning, .. grounds maintenance, painting, plumbing, carpentry, janitorial services and general labor assignments throughout the plants, as well as sludge hauling and disposal. Fifty-three positions are currently authorized for this division. One Foreman ($2568 - $3338) position is recommended for the groundskeeping and landscaping crews. This specialist will be responsible for all .. grounds maintenance for our more than 200 acres of treatment plant sites; including the upgraded perimeter and interior landscaping and will also administer contracts with private firms for related services. Three new Helper ($1329 - $1655) positions are recommended to provide painting, groundskeeping, digester and general maintenance and janitorial services throughout the plants. 3340 - Collection Facilities One Collection Facilities Worker II ($1821 - $2268) and one Collection Facilities Worker I ($1329 - $ 1655) are recommended to supplement existing crews which maintain more than 800 miles of trunkline sewers with 81 siphons, 33 pumping stations and other spots that require frequent maintenance. Several new interceptor sewers are nearing - - completion and will be placed in to service soon. 3350 - Mechanical Maintenance This division is responsible for maintaining the wide variety of mechanical equipment throughout the two treatment plants, including stationary engines, pumps, hydraulic systems and belt filter presses as well as the vehicle fleet and the portable/emergency equipment. -5- r One Lead Mechanic ($2513 - $3129) position is recommended to upgrade the preventive maintenance program during off hours and will be assigned to lead a weekend or swing shift crew. An additional Mechanic ($1951 - $2429) is recommended to do entry level work and to assist the ,journeymen, primarily in the new odor control facilities that will be placed into service next year at bath plants. *' 3360 - Electrical Maintenance No changes are currently recommended. 3370 - Instrumentation r No changes are currently recommended. 3380 - Plant Operations r No changes are currently recommended. TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT The Technical Services Department is responsible for source control programs, the analytical laboratory which performs testing and analysis r to monitor treatment plant processes and industrial discharges to assure compliance with environmental standards, administration of the $2 million ocean monitoring program and the Districts' efforts to comply with the .. wide variety of laws and regulations which govern our operations. There are currently 73 authorized positions in the following Divisions. 3510 - Director of Technical Service's Office r No changes are currently recommended in this office. r 3520 - Compliance Establishment of a new classification for two new Compliance Supervisor av ($3482 - $4527) positions is recommended to provide supervision for the quality assurance/quality control section and for the marine monitoring/marine science section. The Districts' source control program, laboratory, outside contractors and day-to-day plant and laboratory activities require a major quality assurance/quality control program. The marine monitoring/marine science program is also proposed to be expanded and some of the outside contract responsibilities will be • moved in-house. An Engineer ($3482 - $4527) position is recommended as section supervisor and project engineer for regulatory/legislative air quality projects, technical oversight and evaluation of air quality issues. The deletion of one Associate Engineer ($3057 - $3974) position is recommended to provide for the above reclassification to more properly reflect the expanding duties and responsibilities related to air quality regulations. - r Two Principal Environmental Specialist ($3057 - $3974) positions will be deleted when incumbents are reclassified to the new Compliance Supervisor recommended above, to more properly reflect the nature of their duties. -6- • _ One Environmental Specialist III ($2675 - $3331) position is recommended for addition to the quality assurance/quality control section to improve District-wide sampling, analysis and evaluation. Three additional Environmental Specialist II ($2398 - $2985) positions are recommended to support the quality assurance/quality control , the marine studies program and the air quality engineer. 3580 - Laboratory A 13.9% salary range adjustment is recommended for three vacant Laboratory -- Supervisor ($3482 - $4527) positions to more adequately reflect new section supervisory responsibilities for high level scientific oversight of lab sections in the organic analysis, general analysis and methods development sections. An additional Principal Lab Analyst ($2593 - $3371) position is _ recommended for mid-year to operate a new $300,000 gas chromatograph/mass spectrophotometer instrument and to function as a group leader in this highly technical field. The transfer of some quality assurance/quality control responsibilities and the bioassay evaluation work to the Compliance Division will allow the deletion of two Senior Lab Analyst ($2550 - $3175) positions. One entry level Lab Analyst I ($2048 - $2550) position is recommended to provide bench work to cover the increasing work load. There are currently two part-time classifications in the laboratory. The Part-time Technician ($8.47/hr. max) position is recommended for deletion and transfer to the Part-time Assistant ($8.36/hr. max) classification. - - Two additional Part-time Assistant positions are recommended to provide economical weekend lab bench work and to take required beach samples. We generally hire students in the sciences to do much of this work. 3590 - Source Control This Division needs to expand in high level technical expertise and - supervision so that we can step up our enforcement efforts against companies that violate our industrial waste ordinance; and to implement the new waste minimization program. Accordingly, a new Engineer ($3482 - $4527) position is recommended to assume supervisory responsibility in the enforcement section, to develop overall enforcement strategies and procedures and to provide project technical management. Two additional Assistant Engineer ($2577 - $3351) positions are recommended. One is for the enforcement section to monitor and administer "significantly violating companies", to perform special enforcement actions and to assist in preparation of actions to be taken .- against violators. The other is to work in the permit section to evaluate and approve pretreatment system submittals and to assist in administering the permit renewal process. , -7- r Three additional Industrial Waste Inspector II ($2333 - $2905) positions are recommended. One will replace an Industrial Waste Inspector I ($2076 - $2585) position to recognize the need for higher level technicians for the monitoring and enforcement programs. • ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT The three divisions of the Engineering Department include 42 authorized positions. Additionally ten temporary construction inspectors, who receive no benefits, are currently employed and eight consultants are on site through professional services contracts. The Department is responsible for planning and managing the Districts' facilities expansion and improvement projects. The recommended Joint Works Treatment Facilities budget estimates capital expenditures of $640 million over the next ten years. In order to administer this expansive treatment plant construction program as well as the trunk sewer construction program, staff is recommending the addition of ., 15 positions in the Engineering Department. Because the program will be ongoing for many years, several of these new staff positions are intended to enable us to enhance our in-house capabilities and phase out the need for • on-site construction management consultants. This will result in considerable cost savings for administering our capital facilities programs in the future. 3710 - Director of Engineering's Office r An additional Senior Steno Clerk ($1738 - $2163) is recommended for the Increasing clerical workload. r, 3520 - Planning and Design One additional Engineer ($3482 - $4527) position is recommended to • function as a project manager additional facilities recommended in the recently completed 30-year master plan. • An Associate Engineer ($3057 - $3974) position is recommended to assist the project managers in facilities planning and design activities. A new Assistant Engineer ($2577 - $3351) position is recommended to ~` provide an entry level engineering position to allow development of staff from within. r An Engineering Aide 11 ($2149 - $2675) position is recommended to provide needed technical support to the professional staff. A Part-time Assistant ($8.36/hr. max) position, which receives no benefits, is recommended to provide low cost specialized support services. Engineering students are generally used to staff these part-time positions. • 3790 - Construction Management r One additional Engineer ($3842 - $4527) position is recommended because of the increasing number and complexity of construction projects. This position will function as a project engineer. r r -8- r One additional Principal Construction Inspector ($3057 - $3974) and one additional Senior Construction Inspector ($2905 - $3617) position are recommended to provide supervision and high-level inspection of major construction projects to ensure compliance with the plans and specifications. Four Construction Inspector (E2657 - $3309) positions are recommended because of the increasing workload, to replace existing temporary inspectors. An Engineering Aide III ($2365 - $2945) position is recommended to perform work related to as-built drawings, change order and engineering calculations and to provide drafting support to the engineering and inspection staff. One new Part-time Assistant ($8.36/hr. max) position, is also recommended �- to provide low cost specialized support services in this division. - g_ 778/89 .. DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY EXHIBIT A PROPOSED 1989-90 PERSONNEL CHANGES A B C D E F Currently Proposed Revised Annual _ Dept Authorized New Total Cost No. Department/ Division Positions Positions Positions (Savings) 2150 GENERAL MANAGER 1 1 Management Support 10 10 ,3 Personnel 8 1 9 60.564 19 1 20 60.564 -5 6 2210 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 5 5 2220 Accounting 13 1 14 27,612 .d 2230 Purchasing & Warehouse 16 1 17 33,456 9 2240 Information Systems 6 4 10 154.620 3 40 6 46 215.688 12 3310 GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT 17 17 �3 3330 Plant Maintenance 53 4 57 99,636 ,,4 3340 Collection Facilities 25 2 27 47,076 15 3350 Mechanical Maintenance 60 2 62 66.696 'S 3360 Electrical Maintenance 26 26 1 3370 Instrumentation 24 24 18 3380 Plant Operations 118 118 `9 323 8 331 213.408 1 21 3510 DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES 4 4 "? 1 3520 Compliance 9 4 13 167.340 3 3580 Laboratory 31 2 33 49,308 '4 3590 Source Control 29 5 34 208,308 ?5 73 .11 84 424.956 a 771 3710 DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING 6 1 7 25,956 2B 3720 Planning & Design 15 5 20 191,712 3 3790 Construction Management 21 9 30 356,976 'A 42 15 57 574,644 31 ! TOTAL 497 41 538 1.489,260 PERS90A.XLS i .on ow 5/25/89 PROPOSED PERSONNEL CHANGES EXHIBIT B By POSITION CLASSIFICATION • 1989.50 A B C D 1 F Step 5 Annual Current Proposed Proposed Monthly Coat No. Classification Auth Add Delete Auth Rate (Savings) 1 2150 General Manager's Office 2 Board Secretary 3 Management Support 4 Personnel ,. Risk and Safety Manager 1 l 5,e17 60,564 5 6 2210 Director of finance's Office .. 1 2220 Accounting 8 Accounting Technician I 1 2 2,301 21,61E 9 2230 Purchasing/warehousing 10 Senior Storeskeeper 1 1 2 2,788 33.456 11 2240 Information Services 12 Info Services Specialist 1 I 2 4,635 55,520 13 Programmer/ Analyst 1 1 4,527 -54.324 11 Programmer/ Analyst 1 1 2 4,036 48,432 15 Programmer 1 1 2 3,211 38,892 40 16 Info Services Tech II E 2 2,750 66,000 17 18 3310 General Superintendent's Office 19 3330 Plant Maintenance 20 Foreman 4 1 . 5 3,338 40.056 21 Helper 7 3 10 1,655 55,580 22 3340 Collection Facilities ow 23 Coll Pic worker 21 9 1 10 21268 11.216 24 CD11 Pic Yorker I 4 1 5 1,655 19,860 25 3350 Mechanical Maintenance r' 26 Lead Mechanic 10 1 11 3,129 37,540 27 Mechanic 19 1 20 21429 29,148 28 3360 Electrical Maintenance 29 3370 Instrumentation 30 3380 Plant Operations r 1 PERS90B.XLS 2:23 PN r S/25/B9 PROPOSED PERSONNEL CHANGES EXHIBIT B r BY POSITION CLASSIFICATION 198E-90 r A B C D B P Step 5 Annual Current Proposed Proposed Monthly Cost No. Classification Auth Add Delete Total Rate ISavingsl 31 3510 Director of Technical Services' Office 32 3520 Compliance 33 Compliance supervisor 2 2 4,527 108.648 34 Prim Environmental Specialist 2 2 3,974 -95,376 35 Environmental Specialist III 2 1 3 3,331 39,972 36 Environmental Specialist II 1 3 4 2.985 101.460 37 Engineer 1 1 4,527 541324 38 Associate Engineer 2 1 1 3,974 -47,680 39 3580 Laboratory 40 Laboratory Supervisor 3 3 4,527 162.972 r 41 Laboratory Supervisor 3 3 3,574 -143.064 42 Prin Laboratory Anaylst 1 1 5 3,371 40,452 43 Sr Laboratory Anaylst 5 3 3,175 -76.200 41 Laboratory Anaylst I 3 1 4 2,550 10,600 45 Part-time Technician 1 1 1,468 -17.616 46 Part-tine Assistant 3 3 6 1,449 52,164 �. 47 3590 Source Control 48 Engineer 1 1 4,527 54,324 49 Assistant Engineer 1 2 3 3,351 aO,124 50 Industrial Waste Insp II 6 3 9 2,905 104,580 51 Industrial Snake Insp I 5 1 4 2,505 -31,020 52 53 3710 Director of Engineering's Office 54 Sr Steno Clerk 2 1 3 2,163 25.956 55 3720 Planning a Design 56 Engineer 3 1 4 1,527 54.324 57 Associate Engineer 1 1 2 3,971 47,698 58 Assistant Engineer 1 - 1 3,351 40,212 59 Engineering Aide II 1 1 2,575 32,100 60 Part-time Assistant 1 1 1,m 17,388 61 3790 Construction Management 62 Engineer 4 1 5 4,527 54,324 53 Prig Construction Insp 2 1 3 3,974 47,688 64 Sr Construction Insp 4 1 5 31617 43,404 65 Construction Insp 5 4 9 3,309 158,832 r 66 Engineering Aide III I 1 2 2,945 35,340 67 Part-time Assistant I 1 1,449 17.388 _ 6s TOTAL 119 52 11 160 1,489.260 PBflMMEL$ 2:22 PH iOLWf vJL@Yil4L1.f@R P]W 1 NIIA av o@RTas @rM1VL 9eKILL MIIT@ 1YY0111'IFU Sy ®IWL IVIIW@ 1oAw ELLv @@ilrm an@ r@axwet rnul A to LNII Aura e[A]RxR Am o@LfTa NYIC IISO Ydl SNXR BIFb1P P@Nb6/IAWLL MLRU wY M EOI Am etl LOI A9r LIII L 9NRV PIKIYp@ LPMFBLL xALK® Auum a1MSR EB pKL]rm.RTAIL i@ pAII]Rf YANL IIYAK[ pp@]il@tl i MAgT[Ipll@ Fffp11CLL wYlf@ 0001[FP1M] w vl e. n o@LLM a E@fRAL olAlruA a olLumc n@w'1 wumwlx T1aonLu r wnm FYE]YF@@6 LLLRICN WpikT [WICK RfY wFIT [W141 TLW 9YIM} ILFAIfN 6LR I eA�Aa E@}E] 9L OlA w1]l V[fW.� 9GR[i Em61 MISfAV AY®. \@ 19l AffiIRAIR Ab111YR MOIMdLyr yyriL]y,@py] UPLXNIOY$ MAIVI@WLfl IKILtt1Fd ,uY@@ eu,wvw Lax LVOLIAYLL LAOMaY EM[L LtlTLL i m1411 Nirr Aaanlq aro wLs euwlyusL vWr a@ east 11R2 Lpt rK I¢p uLx IpX 1] U N A N H IY 11 1@ 9 l/ 6] X M NVLIAXLL W EMR@ LY401FH:]Y6 ®@LGOG AMp Iy1p 5W5 FK1 IML IKL rKL FAR ,LILE9@ IILMAG@ Ltl11aL MAYAw IWK@ WII'@ IYXLU@ Eµ G a[t M4L IGp MP IW MA IIAMAaA K[eAG[]ra OxA1L E@—U w—L- ER 1.1A M MUL 6R.1 5 M KTUL LR IK[6 M @TALL PPo%6® 1999-1960 NApAGp¢yP Pot 3 rd m _ GQIRIL MXQQ 1 ______________ mAw wr,s"PICK WASEWIT sGPP01.t PE0.S9NM.L Orrict CHIEF EQ AEUP eiFwxMEE on d I Em9 5509 b RY.IC 1R0"RR W"Eaff mPPoR Rrm IQmMa REE E SAPER eOQD RCY W, GQE0.LL W 1 PAIm AON ZEST RIDC Am ASR ] m0N5a MI6 0 mli 4001 C001 Q AIM Am R AEN A9R R AIR WIF PQSONNU QAE 1 0 NR )Ny ]CR AAR QR ISM RR 0 106� 3109 PR PIPS A95R - 0 J]R � Af50I 1IM 1ENT 1 ,_ 106b m9i SP PM"C" e ICSN 2865 SLERRQP II y o 1Rto nR AIM AIDE � SEQCIQ9 S 1059t MN PER AiSr e IC59E EUl 1059A A411 � u srtlro auR 1 Oi nv R"PICE AIDE OSQ WE STND auc IQa AIDE 0 1O55P e0A0 lOSDA 3101 OTR AID[ R[aPEO am 0 I059 1R5 ]OM 1E15 QI am D o Y IMPOSE DewnCHS E MINTENQR 71UH11101,EMCEES MIAEQIDG DIRECIM" 4LNWL,., rCIQR BIWu1NEQOER nO r SERVICES EL IK " R UAn R PIKE 5 " R 111, SR PIKpPDJ[I1NR6"ICePx "TQM E 3 OVAIL GO RAID If➢Rm Ia4mp IWY[!almllp)I )ml) 1f X ou n ruurcr 1 - 6]n 1 le 11 IJ antra 1 Ivmlt armann sunaa ]csmnru rwausa a auvnmc vro m¢Ira 1 XCn N}14a e� s]A t WIOYSW'R XT t m] oA saa mu ] Xn w]w aR ad Im I IF pymRllAL Ml9 m 4ll 6®ime alO 1 I � Jia >xfB 1(OAIIWI ]Im R yaplly lma JMI m Wrm — 1 tl6t aIM ]lA 1 � Jl% aN m6 na It] ] a Ua ILaI a u<tm 1 1 s Wsa ass lass ]om m ST9L01 a Ima nm lmlo ne ,� mo sva Im A x lml< nA mlv w mo faa t[a t 1 o law ms) — sm t ]Ra uc tm 1 1 Ima xAl leas WI uc+ml uc tm )]n]stiva Wva sWx 105x1 3ml la]11 3m1 14a11 3%1 lalel nm � a alw 0 lml nA sy a mna)m[ e Im6e ]PI6 m slao aax a atasn ala e ) lmsr as ImV mm � oma xm[ umn aW[ 1 0 ]ml lAs iml las �. am sta)mc a]r 0 1 Ia.TM. IOe>/N. Y R laT a PRGPO$®1,P9-1�P oeEunas c MIMPSAtld oee\Pn¢M eAGA 4 lll GENERAL SWfRIMCNEM 1 6 5T 119 14 197 AZr SVIT OR" AES4 SII[T ME 5509 5509 SP PAh IGR 0 AIp1 11G 5 9 57 ZF 63 36 39 PIJM OP® maim TECH SWWRT PWRR MIM NANCC COLL 10 PARLIMES MOWICAL EIECIRIERI. DISIRNOR CMIfP Pl. MRGE 9A FOR OMAIL SE6 PAGC K 6 90 FCP OCI\IL rNrem 19M-1990 MIMIOIYIC[YMM1M11[ ew6 U Jn _ aMMM seMnnamMr +' t wsl wn rver WM RRsr mer na %aR ssoe a nq,im 0 5019 w - aRR ewc M ra osera as ela 9c l 0 roR oma - 5 9 Mw6 fSGI somm, s SR aER s 7 v N➢ . 9sn eM anwx serc wwcuJx dM 1 1 .� J9'19 J9H v-a RS MR 1 1351 sm I _ J IMSI MJI dGR 61M i d � 1Vi9 MO] V�1 % SIMC _. a Jon nv .. M RECORw¢FM l .. lose mm aMR AR.v/N. v IWeO ISOf 19A awnan s PPLP)rP ou9mav) revs u 9PPLL swunrtPwwr r eP) 119 IT 19 ~ WT WR WO e6}LIR IMI fLWLWRG)OIK21 1 1 99M S9N P Ix6101 9019 su rae 9c v xo m omu sn vlce P m mna w ue vuxr Pwnov e Wv atula x r 9us mrt Nry wPm mA 16 1 >lY ))N W P PWrt NP RR INP G9P n 9 TI610 >IA E61Y )IN a rnA)@wAY N A99 xYA r Pu P rrxv u w ANc m) Ltt Lsw n `C� mslo ' AN wL aw x c r Asly IeW xwv o 16$$ vrt uL L,^• r x n.wn.. WFORR IM-19W OPQATIdf 9 Q•J16Q3 W WY'JR ele�C DI V BQQIL 94PUOIIOICOII 1 NST 9 19 IN IYT MI WQ QQ MI Ir¢x 1 OLIOI./f[Q plPKfe 1 5509 SSW - rm vw u ro ons¢ sQ eAI u ro mP¢ PLIM MIATPNQtt O1LL eK QQ PItR pfn ..e na IuucQ sQ vI,W so ro Qna wa Q fMWll 1 as r rQnlsl so¢W roYHx >w sxa .... a Im PNIn O =VlID =MER ty 1 x x ms% xw msA AQ ASA ffiI PpWe WQ nt V A59C AN NOL ill N 2 2 AI91 xW IDMS DV WE QQ 11 ASV %9l �P APQ WQ n s mu xv1 AI1Ax n 1XIx1Q n x ]OSx N96 AS]c N% r ' RAT IQOI t a r Asw Nx9 Q QuaxW - :osw nn PVODQ t Pin I 0 A56 n15 A56 D15 [yWP WQ 1 RPCE NAII pg1p08¢ 0 l 0 ]Y+Y DQ A55[ LYA MS[ DY RILIlT101Y IMODIDI I I I MPI 2112 ASV NU N[VQ 10 O 1N91: 1655 P/T ISSI ert eIQ1Q ert VlVY 0 sII.69/M. %.IpW/W. %.W/hf. lel Lrvr�ty •<rd euWeltP !m smr hlp-vn 1nelWad In 1ete1 evWr1W yemnl aplemt. 93T%a IaY19J0 awanm a lema\rso oounea na e � m soma svrvoreoom 1 � xn m u m \ax sure am un sort lea �p 1 amsslma avvore 1 ssw sm m ace u m orn¢ sa rsa u ry aau. n A A i 39 van annol\ea o9ucna r9rnma aaens\s vrnuat vermmrrmu H m ear x ra mm rxi aoan rw. oaa rxi e\acoi rxi leeesa 1 S 1 I as ua 9m xss � Im elm xw om nm my vm nm sw J 9 0 saJ sou sosJ Sy oen xrwr von rarmr an Jea ou m SIN,, 9 � wo race rza va ma 9rm J ae asJ\ Je\ meJ\ Jsn A� 9 � s om Sml n mn 9rd n r e A62, 31V9 3f6L JD9 al➢6p 11 � aslo J9a uamn 1 %60 J031 InD w nb 6 W3 '° a IeaYnf alm 19 J ffi1r lU as9r bU avn ova nl � 1 mx as om IItr J vaio rza l 6 ML Ax A59\ Px a Jw " msa xn elm as m as99 as w x aslc vrre asx 9496 uauns a also au w u to aramw urvv9w a a Ase o 0 � ass\ �r asss mJ wr m\a r mm N9a 16ss 2Nn I 1655 319n 1653 .1 I I I I , I PRONm 1BR?19JD I TECKKICAL SERVICES Phu 5 89 D].RECNR OP TEa sERYICFs 1 6as7 2 1 CLERICAL IF! fi . 47 A CORDS CLR 1 P 2020 RECORDS CLEM 0 1059 1835 CLERK 0 10.17/hr. 13 33 34 ODMIANCE LAEOM?MY SOURCE CONTROL CtlIPLIINC1 MANAGER LAB MANAGER SOURCE C0111ROL MGA 1 5540 5288 5540 SEE PAGE SA FOR DMIl SEE PAGE 5B FOR DETAIL SEE PAGE SC FOR DETAIL PPI6t6m lees-lsso OEamut surlm eEa v overml ae 0Eu sums w 1 wsr z x w P.EdM.� P.E06E 6 LABWAfOn COV6fPV. 6[101. CI311[2 600Ra COMPRQ. rE PEE SB FOR OET6Il SEE PEOE 6 PfA DEi61L SEE PE[6 N OfT66 SPE PEE SC PW OET6LL N@LIARE w IJ OMlLIIMa 1011G® 1 5540 w P 6 P `" wum ssmEElrcE lu>ME sauce EIP OOEcm a6xluE cwEz6la sseve mvfiva s0eu ENGIMu <sn <sa Or w Pu Plea M ISmc PILP 0 1 J 4 19P6 z LNnEPLCn FNlIP 6Pft n P 106E P966 106& 3985 P MI 0 n610 Z 60 R YECW06 aw 1 lw EE EECR➢5 aw 0 IM IM MW 0 r $I0.17/hr. VW .INS-ISN r RfIM[AL S[PVla3 PWl SL LMSLO S/E/N N DllC W IWI sull S � 1 N51 1) 1 3 N coala P. LLNC i cwLIAMa a«suv. A4m1. anlcLL Mows cmrrtroL LEL PWL SA aY OLTAM1 SFL eW[C PU'JaA1L 5[F IW[)PG DETAIL SC[PW[Y M LCTAIL r LMCU 1 v w My ILVI I $me r ASTI W IVYWu a Lvs ,r 3 I 16 6 %PA IGM L LFVIM IMRaII"CCMM LO6AW OMI M IYa I=Y/V1Rp414t �V I 5U%R EMOU"Y OM Lu,)m"I NPW ti isn un On MkVWWU U MDWYW MIM w aU 1 11 ll)1 n) 31P1 llil AL SP W HILL MWAMAL1 31)5 1MA )115 ION 31i5 W au III II WNIL III WAMLL III33N) N11 us uW n w NLL l] 3 n50IW WWI 550 10N 3550 IOW 1 EN � w MamnW a 1059E 3%s N sioio aW 105P 316)) XOJG O flo.fsT.. ert rsslnAMt As 6 eraom Irer.19L 1WOIIrLL MIrD rl4 Y N gRIT!q � Rq f4 lgt 1 N51 U 1 1 ]I rrGNl.r eqa i mV1.lY4 ®rRV. 140. OEIICLL LIMiNgI r m riY v rm aein s¢rw s rm mm rm Na s rm an¢ sa e]q v rm otnu saga mlia N YaMr axIM.IW t 5510 a e ] Inannmr ewms sernu 1NrtfB .. Iwllm 1 a511 �' imanrz tAl® NAIINi r]cma iNvan rsnm 1 1 1 »]e ms me sma grlva swa 1 NN sr uY uu r %N atr p3 NSr a� $ 1 'd ll5l 1)51 Laa l Y llSP Y ] la4a ]]61 � IV➢6]II 9 la% ZAS � IVllI5P1 1 Ia6N II95 O HQe6 ODf 1 s IDSy � 1VA91 laNa Ir16 aaQ6 ClIr 5 Iqe 1!R a Oa a yy rrt iYlsrur r p.ee/r. ramsw xs- sw amua ouaPumre rue c sa DIP[[M OI amnia 1 Ns> 6 30 w Rl}ttle PLAIWb4 i DGiIBI GMpeclltll MM ' araano an vaa u ra atan aassu sal s j s s '� sows ma amps mmmoR setnae exa se amu t alllf!] alae[P s w asa am' natru a assocurz aawnarz s 001 M mw — t ma a Aran ASSWun tan sna nst atmn vsl a Pssac xu—n r araa rz tas auc t 1 t law Nat laa mws • s+`AIDE m t IDa][ Nas r mMn 1 laa an saanur t 1 Iowa wl lEP altt t � la9 NN u a1M 6In _ la) no I,rm W 1MV ww flue I j10.tt/4. n ast 1 PtlD4'9190f19M r iX1RGpl KIMTDI! PWE N A DID[(lO�p' MIG[GIP4 � 1 un MIOL MOD6 i D61a NKRVLTIYI MQ PY[6 M MxnL 5¢PWE 6 PLL DlTi6 OEllfgn4 MVBFB 1 SXI nY ID 6 6 I 6 MYP 11 CLL SYnF16 LOtli iDPtiNT 9 m PPN 1W Il Y Y OE® 1 SMl OI6OFY mmo FWliFl11 p4PFG 3 1 4511 45 62l 4SV fll➢I[llLL ftwvLL ASIO[ pGP NS}16P CWSI 3W 1 x ni mi ]ni v tttlT>ffi a 06i 014 SR CUI1 MSi x x ICNC Ylt 1D66[ mil 1066f Y11 m6l 1!@ Rin II@ [PoSl PISP l x i 1061P n'Jf IDW ]M IMIF ]]R Gli iYF III Pl MIST nlP x i4P W6T n.@ 1/11 IKE 3H5 D PIP.W h. r 1061B IBIS ml Imc n x xos r Od 0Q(D IDS9 NIH PR usl t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGETS P A klATION litan dO Org ,s 'p T 0 O sauce 1954 q�NGE COON 1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR [ [ [ [ [ [ [. [ [ I [ [ I [ 1lMW i41N!OF]AT.V fICD BntET WFaI1F LII/x sumac M Isunm/wumlm n.wmnm emir ALmIpB011S ex.lnwx GI lo) _ IQ (0) (0) tmau Ohm lM brie Imuu4u rWl IM•tl IMM 4 IIW ielmevl P�Ntl Ipr M tt MOM f®IalsW ba.t Ysm{In FawIW 'v..r Ivafa/I'anup) 1. IYt MIWa.Wr\ MI.M.YY ja.19.M \ xl.ml a.011.RO a.m.. {a{[t to wlnble 41n4t bnl It m x{el Wall"AmMW Yvrin pntlmnt It MHtlial WltlW nil M gwtl In ar tM yu ~IY m...I—f4nmry Mill,.ntlHtla.WMIN <p11.11 tabll"Hf W aW Qwit,a1mHA 41Pnt W airy.ala mf Wnln ryHaV IMIMIA fw 40wn..pv mnWl W aasll mnW nation'nail. -lY4x 4leynnt IMI 4 N mill -IM-x MII4nt nyaa bI MAn pHm111 l.Wn a b aM non IMin1m a!OL ...21 ma mnV'I tlialnl O.M.YO 1.M.m] a).mJ IT.OD \x.m' tMlnl f Nrmfbluon Af Imrul(ee[rua m pl n mlMa i<a0.0A 14y Mm W W Jv mn r<n x eel ra 0011 mnnl. o.l,.m Or In. Imr<n ua n avlw a.ft<aslo-.. Will<Y6 TM.m iwuW.fas 1. W Wlll.I (mlw g0a16) -1 of wlmmi. IMMI M,.m W m VmC Ilnr to mN't AbAn n1f16 MIIGq a.a m VYIYIt'Imt. gaAa M416 <M.Oma W4 nf4tlMn. euwf W.H. <W.W, Wrtmlf mlfleu In a'..M(im MI. F.W.mlalb MI.x' Im..W"i.1/Mrlalw.rw aims MIa.1 M W IIr W.b.m.. 11u.I.f m111b.1. Nlian x ono uf4 1M4fa n nu I—es. .a M !. N.ranaul\ranbut I.Iv.mo I.Btl.lm VG.MI a.M M.am -IW m1n<t fa w W t M plm. SWI.0 \. blla R-1!.1st—i <.M.M s.M.mo M.mo lm.M I.M.M -1 ..0 m 1.11,tlgtA.. -Ionia to disposal mlts fw print.IaWalq.m eMm H.mutt a 1.mWMlw.CliM'MaM.1G Ba. s. salMat mupr lx.m' elp.m' m.m' 10.00' -Imra In M a!rp 4lpavt. e. Win/wlelaml sJm.aa l.ns.ma IS.. nl.m' M.me -Fair M Nall w1.W rpin m Milli W ygntl 1wIW/9gllr fallllln W Ml am WY.141PW- ). Orurtn a IYn11MA i.im.'a 3.M.M <la.tli> tM.mw Maa Gu b tmar H ryaulGllltla Ion ov�WIA 0M[l.fuomVien• .mn. f�lIW HIem Hll lrc.ya. e. mllltw e.m.m' /.M.mo IDI.OD m1.M I.Htm -Immu Gw m elm.f mra eMA 1.Aa�r an 1em1A W1oC W Wnlmml .omer.W tm.4e rnlllnr. s. am w orl.M. Sinn :.bs.mo x.W.bw ml.. ]x.tla sv.m. -Im..0 m a.pn 11.lmx.M 41{st tlXt14. . -b rmmm ra p0 pu.ltln W<l llttA I.. 10. TM,J.1.m lrul, W.M.. W.M1.M a.M.. a.... a.M... Im"M it. l..M.1. iMn. iW at. • te. Xn bmt mr.nA aB.m.W la.vt.M a.a..M M.M.M a.... mmw.r [ [ l [ L [ [ [ [ [ t t [ [ [ [ l [ l SCHEDULE I JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY 5/11189 COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITURES & ESTIMATED CARRY-OVER FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) Budget Recommended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est'd Carry-Over 1988-89 Budget or 1987-88 Expenditures or to Fiscal 1989-90 Decrease 1988-89 Decrease Year 1989-90 1. Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits $15,685,000 $17,687,000 $2,002,000 $12,829,800 $13,694,000 $ 864,200 $1,991,000 2. Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants 5,189,000 5,687,000 498,000 4,243,100 5,006,000 762,900 183,000 3. Professional & Contract Services 5,551,000 7,350,000 1,799,000 3,638,900 5,369,000 1,730,100 182,000 4. Equipment Charges 190,000 200,000 10,000 169,500 193,000 23,500 <3,000> 5. Repair & Maintenance Materials & Services 3,165,000 3,765,000 600,000 2,879,000 3,215,000 336,000 <50,000> 6. Research & Monitoring 2,202,000 2,070,000 <132,000 1,943,900 2,188,000 244,100 14,000 7. Utilities 6,056,000 7,220,000 1,164,000 4,421,800 4,825,000 403,200 1,231,000 8. Other Materials, Supplies & Outside Services 2,049,000 2,602,000 553,000 2,218,600 2,135,000 <83 600> <86 000> 9. Total Joint Operating Expenses $40,087,000 $46,581,000 $6,494,000 $32,344,600 $36,625,000 $4,280,400 $3,462,000 10. Revenue and Offsets 1,200,000 2,050,000 850,000 1,771,600 2,091 000 319,400 <891 000> 11. Net Joint Operating $38 887 000 $44,531,000 $5,644,000 1 $30 573.000 $34 534,000 $3,961 000 $4,353,000 Schedule II BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 5/24/89 JOINT OPERATING FUND Fiscal Year 1989-90 ALLOCATION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES A 8 C D E F G H I J GALLONAGE WS -9 60ING I 1 88-89 LUMPARASON 1988-W Estimated Estimated District Flows Estimated 1989-90 Percent District Estimated Required District Required No. Past .Year Increase Flows of Total Contribution Carryover Funding Contribution Funding 1 9,083.33 MG 116.67 9,200.00 MG 9.19% $4,092,000 $ 400,000 $ 3,692,000 $ 4,223,000 $ 3,846,000 2 30,570.76 1,431.52 32,002.28 31.96 14,232,000 1,391,000 12,841,000 11,468,000 10,445,000 3 31,189.25 642.40 31,831.65 31.79 14,157,000 1,384,000 12,773,000 12,265,000 11,170,000 5 4,509.53 50.11 4,559.64 4.55 2,026,000 198,000 1,828,000 2,104,000 1,916,000 6 5,390.66 430.43 5,821.09 5.81 2,587,000 253,000 2,334,000 2,050,000 1,867,000 7 7,498.25 687.21 8,185.46 8.17 3,638,000 356,000 3,282,000 2,749,000 2,504,000 11 6,676.47 458.80 7,135.27 7.13 3,175,000 310,000 2,865,000 3,239,000 2,950,000 13 171.55 131.40 302.95 0.30 134,000 13,000 121,000 58,000 53,000 14 2,003.85 <903.85> 1,100.00 1.10 490,000 48,000 442,000 731,000 666,000 TOTALS 97 093.65 MG 3,044.69 MG 100,138.34 M 100.00% $44 531 000 $4,353,000 $40,178 000 $38 887 000 $35 417 000 JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III JOINT OPERATING 6 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5117/89 1989-90 FISCAL YEAR 1966-87 1987-88 1988-89 1988-F 1989-90 ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND 1. SALARIES 6 WAGES 11,191,376 13,149,700 %739,000 16,258,000 18,530,000 la) 2. RETIREMENT 1,888,014 2,191,366 1,983,000 2,938,000 3,384,000 la) 3. WORKERS COMP 120,000 186,000 134,DD0 134,000. 155,000 (a) 4, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 19,237 15,855 51000 25,000 25,000 (a) 5. GROUP INSURANCE 899,901 1,276,752 1,198,000 1,353,000 1,509,000 (a) 6. UNIFORM RENTAL 47,267 51,497 73,ODO 57,000 84,000 (a) 7. TOTAL BENEFITS 2,974,419 3,721,470 3,393,000 4,507,000 5,157,CCO la; 8. SALARIES, WAGES, 6 BENEFITS 14,165,795 16,671,170 18,132,000 20,765,000 23,687,000 9. DIRECT CHARGES-CORF/DIST 11,828,505) (2,249,960) (2,578,000) (2,850,000) (3,500,000) 10. COST ALLOC-CORF/DIST (1,329,824) (1,791,523) (1,860,0001 (2,230,000) (2,500,000) 11. W.O. SALARIES 8 BENEFITS (3,158,3291 (4,041,493) (4,436,000) (5,080,000) (6,000,000) (6) 12. NET J.O. PAYROLL 11,007,466 12,829,687 13,694,000 15,685,000 17,687,000 (c) 13. MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES 14. GASOLIME, DIESEL 6 OIL 207,501 203,102 215,000 265,ODD 250,C00 (d) 15. INSURANCE 589,666 857,352 553,000 646,DO0 600,000 (e) 16. MEMBERSHIPS 16,484 14,742 18,➢➢0 25,000 30,000 (f) 17. OFFICE EXPENSE 18. SUPPLIES 64,144 96,082 84,000 110,000 110,000 (g) 19. OTHER 43,635 49,510 50,000 55,ODD 55,000 (9) 20. OPERATING SUPPLIES 21. CHLORINE 6 ODOR CONTROL 1,457,451 1,804,810 1,900,000 211001000 211001000 (6) 22. SULFIDE CONTROL 622,020 605,154 850,000 850,000 1,C00,D00 (6) 23. CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 974,948 1,833,150 2,256,000 2,239,CDO 2,587,000 (i) 24. LAB CHEMICALS 6 SUPPLIES 55,788 63,529 130.000 100,000 140,000 (j) 25. TOOLS 49,716 75,943 BO,ODO 85,000 85,000 (j) 26. SOLVENTS, PAINTS, 6 JAN. SUPPLIES 145,923 94,562 100,000 150,000 150,000 (j) 27. OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 238,019 198,576 136,000 286,000 200,000 (j) JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III JOINT OPERATING 8 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5/17/89 1989-90 FISCAL YEAR r 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90 ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND r 28. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .+ 29. GROUMEEPING 27,498 42,975 43,000 67,000 100,000 (k) 30. OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES. 62,320 95,903 125,000 150,000 400,000 (k) r 31. SOLIDS REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL 2,Z81,199 2,767,538 4,351,COO 4,400,000 5,5GO,ODO (k) - 32. OTHER WASTE DISPOSAL 72,737 25,910 1531000 174,000 185,000 (k) r 33. OTHER 209,008 240,114 250,C00 255,000 635,000 (k) r 34. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 35. LEGAL 160,711 267,486 250,000 250,000 Z75,000 (1) 36. AUDIT 8 ACCOUNTING 21,548 19,978 251000 25,000 25,000 (1) 37. ENGINEERING 52,373 39,201 101D00 501000 50,000 (1) r 38. OTHER 80,039 439,833 1621000 180,000 180,000 (1) r 39. PRINTING 8 PUBLICATION 40. REPRO-IN-HOUSE 61,508 76,543 82,000 90,000 100,000 (m) 41. PRINTING-OUTSIDE 40,437 49,214 30,0m 59,009 50,000 (m) 42. PHOTO PROCESSING 13,222 19,773 151000 15,000 20,000 (m) r 43. NOTICES 8 ADS 30,079 26,243 50,090 59,000 75,DO0 (m) 44. RENTS 6 LEASES 45. OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 46,132 68,645 78,000 70,000 100,000 (n) 46. DISTRICT EGUIPMENT RENTAL 86,930 105,864 115,000 120,ODD 100,0W (n) 47. REPAIRS 8 MAINTENANCE 48. MATERIALS 2,174,676 2,755,442 3,100,000 3,000,GO0 3,600,000 (o) r 49. CONTRACTS 99,923 123,602 115,000 165,000 165,000 (m) 50. RESEARCH 8 MONITORING 51. OCEAN MONITORING 1,386,889 1,759,596 1,977,000 1,990,000 1,700,000 Ip) 52. OCEAN/I.W./OPER RESEARCH 2O7,649 184,303 211,000 212,000 370,000 (p) r 53. TRAINING, MEETINGS, 8 TRAVEL 53,544 58,854 981000 100,000 125,000 (q) r r JOINT MORNS OPERATING BUM SCHEDULE III JOINT OPERATING 6 WORMING CAPITAL FUOIS 5/17169 r 1989-W FISCAL YEAR 1986-81 1987-68 1988-89 1998-89 1989-90 ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND r 54. UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS Ila a a 21000 2,000 (rl r 55. UTILITIES Cr 56. DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 159,106 116,2T0 90,0D 250,030 200,O00 (s) 57. PO4ER 4,214,281 3,993,300 4,420,E 5,300,E 6,500,600 (s) 58. NATURAL GAS 351,019 113,916 120,000 316,00 250,000 (5) 59. TE-EPHOL 81,227 105,982 105,000 951000 120,E (s) r 60. WATER 66,219 92,332 90,O0 95,E 150,000 (s) r 61. OTHER EXPENSES - 62. FREIGHT 23,917 35,491 35,000 301000 40,000 (t) 63. GENERAL 158,739 221,745 200,800 200,am 225,COO (t) 64. RON OPERATING FEES 0 a 201000 0 250,000 (t) 65. PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 531884 15,546 203,000 50,000 50,000 (u) 66. OTHER NON-OPERATING EXPENSE 191059 41,805 36,ODO 40,Bb0 45,000 (v) _ 67, TOTAL MAX, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES 16,761,286 19,514,916 22,931,000 24,702,000 28,894,000 r 68. COST ALLOCATION-CORF 8 OTHER (160,564) (289,277) (300,000) (300,000) (350,00(1) (a) 69. NET J.O. MAT'L, SUPPLIES, 8 SER9 16,600,722 19,225,639 22,631,000 24,402,E 28,544,000 (x) r 70. REVENUE f1,392,542I (1,482,319) (1,791,000) (1,200,000) 11,700,O001 lyl 71. !ET J.O. EXPENDITURES 26,215,646 30,573,007 34,534,E 36,887,001) 44,531,00 (z) r r r r r r SCHEDULE IV 5/11/89 REV. 5/19/89 NOTES TO JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET 1989-90 FISCAL YEAR r _ (a) Salaries, Wa es and Benefits - See attached Schedule V for 1989-90 salaries r and benefits est mates and projected payroll savings. Estimated 1988-89 salaries and benefits are below budget primarily because delayed construction schedules allowed positions to remain vacant. For r one-half of the year the Retirement Board reduced the required Districts contribution by 50%, but the reduction is not expected to last into 1989-90. (b) Cost Allocations and Direct Char ebacks to CORF and Individual Districts - Represents direct labor and benefits chargebacks and cost allocation to the appropriate fund for which the work is actually performed (CORF for work on treatment plants' capital expansion; respective Capital Facilities funds _ for work on individual District's collection facilities capital expansion; and Operating funds for maintenance and repair). Also reflects administra- tive time chargeable to self-funded insurance programs; and Source Control Division and Laboratory Division charges to respective Districts for industrial waste monitoring and enforcement program. " (c) Net J�O Payroll - This line item represents the net salaries, wages and enefib is chargeable to Joint Operating Fund for administration and maintenance/operation of the Joint works facilities, after chargebacks to �+ other funds for services performed by the labor pool described above in (b). - - (d) Gasoline, Oil and Fuel - This account Includes gasoline, oil and diesel fuel required to operate stationary treatment plant equipment as well as . approximately 300 pieces of major mobile equipment such as vehicles, cranes, etc. (e) Insurance - Includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity bond, all-risk (earthquake and flood) policy, fire, boiler and machinery policies. The major elements of this account are $323,000 for r $35 million in coverage provided by the comprehensive all-risk policy and $258,000 for in-lieu premiums to increase the reserve levels in the self-insured public liability fund pursuant to the Boards' decision to r, fully self-insure liability risk. (f) Memberships - Districts' memberships in Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA), California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA), Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) , and Long Beach Safety Council. Current year expenses and 1989-90 appropriations include a _fee for membership in AMSA's Conference of Coastal Agencies (CCA), which r works specifically on legislative and regulatory matters relative to ocean disposal issues. r (g) Office Expense - This account includes supplies, forms, small office equ pme�fting materials and postage for all departments. r u Page Two SCHEDULE IV I � V I (h) Chlorine 8 Odor Control Chemicals - The Districts presently use chlorine, and sodium hydroxide caustic soda) as primary odor control chemicals in the treatment plants. Usage of chlorine is expected to decrease by $440,000 during the year as the clarifier covers and foul air scrubbers are placed into service. Caustic soda use in the foul air scrubbers at both plants however, is expected to increase over 300% as new scrubbers are I � placed into service. Caustic soda is also added to trunklines to control hydrogen sulfide in the lines, and $285,000 has been added to the chemical hw budget for the Joint Works' share of this expense. Ferrous chloride use, required to control hydrogen sulfide levels in our digester gas as required by AQMD Rule 431.1, will decrease by $85,000, partially as a result of increased ferric chloride for physical/chemical treatment. During the course of this year, we expect to optimize use of the various odor control chemicals, but expect our overall usage levels and budget requirements to remain high as we maintain compliance with increasingly stringent air quality regulations and bring 20 additional foul air scrubbers on line. I ! (i) Chemical Coa ulants - We expect that the polymer usage level increase in L 198 -90 will be partially offset by lower unit prices resulting in a net increase of $91,000 for the material. Polymer is added to the influent u wastewater along with ferric chloride via the physical/chemical treatment systems at both plants to improve solids removal efficiencies in the primary clarifier basins. It is also added to digested sludge prior to V dewatering to cause the sludge to coagulate to improve the sludge and water separation process. Ferric chloride is used as a backup chemical in the event the primary L chemical distribution systems are out of service for repairs or maintenance, but primarily for enhanced primary physical/chemical clarifier performance. Physical/chemical treatment systems will be fully installed and operational at both plants this year, and we expect to increase our use of ferric chloride in these systems by $262,000 to control hydrogen sulfide emissions and improve solids removal efficiencies in the primary basins. L (,)) Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as scrubber acids, y activa a car on, solvents, cleaners, hardware, janitorial supplies, tools, L laboratory supplies, etc. required to operate and maintain existing and expanding facilities. (k) Contractual Services - The major component of this category is sludge L1 removal and disposal . Contracts have been executed with Recyc Inc. , Pima Gro and Curti Enterprise for agricultural reuse of residual solids. The Coyote Canyon landfill is capable of accepting less and less solids as its ultimate closure approaches, the Coyote tipping fee will increase 50% on Lr July 1, 1989 and no replacement site has yet been approved within the county. A total of $5.5 million has been budgeted for solids removal and ' , disposal . L I it r r Page Three SCHEDULE IV " This account also includes appropriations for groundskeeping services, toxics removal services, outside laboratory services, trash pickup, plant site sweeping, data processing system maintenance and support services, and .. temporary help to level out periodic increases in staff workload and staffing levels. A maintenance and operations contract is anticipated in -- the next year for the Plant 2 oxygen generation plant and $400,000 has been budgeted for that service contract. -- (1) Professional Services - Includes General Counsel , special labor counsel , CPA audit and miscellaneous accounting, data processing, engineering and other consulting services. (m) Printing and Publications - Budget allows for in-house and outside r reproduction costs and reflects expanded management information system and increasingly complex administrative requirements, as well as continuing - demand by public and regulatory agencies for information on Districts' activities. The continuing efforts of our Public Information Officer (PIO) to improve our public education program on Districts' activities is also . . reflected in the increased budget for this line item. .+ (n) Rents and Leases - This account includes cost accounting system charges to e Jo nt Operating Fund for Districts-owned equipment, and outside equipment rental for major equipment used for emergency repairs. The _ 1989-90 allocation has been increased slightly to reflect the increased usage levels of large equipment required over the past four years to support major repairs and maintenance in our upgraded and expanded facilities. ., (o) Repairs and Maintenance - This item, which is for parts and services for repair of plant facilities, reflects an authorization to allow for routine ., equipment maintenance. Should this increased allocation prove to be Insufficient in the event of major unexpected equipment failures and/or - repairs, a transfer from the unappropriated reserves of the individual r Districts would be necessary to meet the increased obligation. (p) Research and Monitoring - $1,600,000 in this account is for contract services to carry out the extensive ocean monitoring program required by �+ EPA Region IX under the provisions of the Districts' NPDES permit, which _ became effective April 1, 1985. This budget decrease does not reflect a reduced effort or program, but a reallocation of specific projects to Districts' staff. The account also includes the Districts' contribution to the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) being conducted under a Joint powers agreement with other Southern California municipal dischargers, and also provides for some operational research and " evaluation to develop optimum operating parameters in the treatment plants. (q) Training, Meetings and Travel - Expanding activities of regulatory .+ agencies have required increased Board member and staff travel in recent years. It is expected that considerable travel will continue to be - required in connection with our continued efforts to obtain an extension of .. our NPDES permit conditions. Also includes ongoing technical training and r Page Four SCHEDULE IVY l u materials for staff, expansion of our supervisory training program to help provide supervisors with the necessary training to more effectively manage their Divisional groups, and required training for new computerized control L systems and other "high tech" equipment. (r) Uncollectible Accounts - For miscellaneous accounts that are determined by the General Counsel and Director of Finance to be uncollectible. (s) Utilities - The $6.5 million allocation for purchased power in this item � j reflects a $1.2 million increase over 1988-89 budgeted levels due to L anticipated completion of additional air scrubbers and electric motors at the new Ocean Outfall Booster Station. II (t) Other Operating Expenses - Expenses not chargeable elsewhere, such as L freight and miscellaneous items, and annual permit renewal fees and penalties assessed by the SCAQMD. L (u) Ex enses A lica%l to Prior Years - Represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance Trom previous years. II YY (v) Other Non�-0-Operating Expenses - Miscellaneous items not chargeable elsew erTi e. (w) Cost Allocation and Direct Chargebacks to CORF and Individual Districts - For materials, supplies and services cost allocation and chargebacks for same purposes as described above under (b). I � (x) Net JO Materials, Supplies and Services - This line item represents the net J� materials, supplies and services chargeable to the Joint Operating Fund for li administration and maintenance and operation of the Joint Works Facilities, after chargebacks to other funds. (y) Net Revenues - Budget amount is for sales of various sewage treatment Lr process by-products, revenues from the wastehauler disposal facilities at L+ Plant No. 1, sampling chargebacks to individual Districts, and miscellaneous items. U (z) Net JO Requirements - This line item represents the net Joint Operating L1 Requirements after reduction of the Total Joint Operating Requirements by the revenues generated from sale of by-products, charges to other agencies, and other miscellaneous operating revenues. L IL1 L 64 ' JOINT OPERATING FUND SCHEDULE V (AND WORKING CAPITAL REVOLVING FUND) 5/11/89 PROJECTED SALARIES & BENEFITS 1989-90 _ Anticipated At Full Payroll Recommended ,. Em to ent Savings Budget SALARIES & WAGES 20,820,000 2,290,000 18,530,000 1 BENEFITS: 1. Retirement 3,801,000 417,000 3,384,000 (2a 2. Workers' Compensation 155,000 -0- 155,000 (2b 3. Unemployment Insurance 25,000 -0- 25,000 (2c - 4. Group Medical - Self-Funded (includes 1,359,000 135,000 1,224,000 (2d 's transfers) - _ - HMO 264,000 24,000 240,000 - Life 51,000 6,000 45,000 5. Uniforms 94,000 10,000 84,000 (2e 6. Total Benefits 5,749,000 592,000 5,157,000 - TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND BENEFITS 26,569,000 2,882.000 23.687.000 NOTES: r 1) Salaries & Wa ees�s - Full employment projection based on the assumption that all 537 author zed permanent positions and the 44 Summer Work Program positions are filled as set forth in the personnel recommendations. Because of our ability to sometimes temporarily ' minimize staffing by adjusting plant operational modes, personnel turnover and strict controls on filling vacancies, we have targeted our payroll cost at $23.7 million next year (13.5% over the 1988-89 budget) which will realize a payroll savings of $2,882,000. If, however, turnover and vacancies are lower, it may be necessary to allocate additional funds from the unappropriated reserve accounts of the individual Districts. 2) Benefits - Remarks above under Salaries and Wages regarding full employment of authorized positions also apply to benefits. (a) Retirement - The Districts' employees are members of the Orange County Employees °' Retireme�tem pursuant to our MOU's. W SCHEDULE V Page Two 5/11/89 v (b) Workers' Compensation - Amount includes total estimated expenditures for the y workers' compensation program set forth in detail in the enclosed Workers' Compensation Self-Insured Fund Budget on Schedule VI. An appropriation of $155,000 is recommended for 1989-90 to maintain the current level of accumulated reserves as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. (c) Unemployment Insurance - Because of reserves credited to our account in the State Unemployment Insurance Fund, only $25,000 in contributions were required for the last year. We anticipate making similar contributions in 1989-90. ai (d) Group ca Medil - Includes the Districts' share of employee medical plan benefits for the prepaid HMO plans, the estimated total costs of the self-funded indemnity plan and the life insurance premiums. Schedule VII details the expected costs of the self-funded plan and the second of three annual increased employee contributions included in current MOUs. The recommended budget increase reflects our increased staffing level. (e) Uniforms - This budget projection is in accordance with employee MOU's. We have i again been able to obtain favorable bids for uniform rental , and the unit costs of ,r uniform service have not increased for several years. I " Y.I Y,1 I : r Ir v Y� I ' r y j ' YJ v JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET WORKERS' COMPENSATION SELF-INSURED FUND SCHEDULE VI 1989-90 FISCAL YEAR 5/03189 1988-89 1999-30 1988-89 ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET ............................................................ 1. Salaries. Wages and Benefits 15,000 14,532 16,000 2. Benefits/Claims 100,000 100.000 110,000 S. Contractual Services 12,000 12,024 13,000 4. Legal Services 5,000 0 5,000 5. Professional Services 17,000 22,788 25,000 6. Supplies 6 Other 1,000 0 1,000 7. Sub-Total 150,000 149,344 170,000 8. Excess Loss Policy 40,000 30,285 40,000 9. Total Expenditures 190.000 179,629 210,000 REVENUES 6 RESERVES 10. In-Lieu Premiums 134,000 134,000 155,000 It. Interest 6 Miscellaneous 56.000 59,912 55,000 12. Total Revenues 190,000 193,912 210,000 12. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 0 14,283 0 13. Reserves and Transfers 708,000 685,069 699,000 14. Ending Reserves 708,000 699,352 699,000 JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN TRUST FUND SCHEDULE VII 19B9-90 FISCAL YEAR 5112189 19B8.89 1989-90 1989.90 -- I988-89 ESTIMATED AT FULL PAYROLL RECOMMENDED _ EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES EMPLOYMENT SAVINGS BUDGET ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. 1. Claims - Medical 926,000 745,980 1.045,000 (105,000) 940,000 2. - Disability 11,000 45,753 31,000 (3,000) 2B4O00 S. - Long Ten Disability 0 48,715 99,000 (9,000) 90,000 4. Dental 117,000 161,964 210,000 (21,000) IB9,000 5. Sub-Total 1,054,000 1,002,412 1,385,000 (138.000) 1,247,000 7. Contractual Services 47,000 37,714 47.000 (5,000) 42,000 6. Stop Loss Insurance 95,000 73,309 93,000 (9,000) 84,000 8. Total Expenditures 1,196,000 1,113,435 1,525,000 (152,D00) 1,373,000 REVENUES 6 RESERVES 9. In-Lieu Premiums From - CSDOC 790,000 640,690 1,112,000 (111,000) 1,001,000 . Employee 135,000 118,324 171,000 (17,000) 154,000 10. Interest a Miscellaneous 0 17,952 0 0 0 11. Reimburse from Stop Loss Insurance 0 0 0 0 0 12. Total Revenue 925,000 776,966 1,283,000 (128,000) 1,155,000 13. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) (271,000) (336.469) (242,000) 24,000 (218.000) 14. Transfers 304,000 260,000 247,000 (24,000) 223,0DO 15. Beginning Reserves 198,000 231,665 198,000 155,000 16. Ending Reserves 231,000 155,196 203,000 0 160,000 JOINT WORTS OPERATING BUDGET PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF-INSURED FUND SCHEDULE VIII 1989-90 FISCAL YEAR 5103189 1988-89 1989.90 1988.89 ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Salaries, Wages and Benefits 1,000 0 1,000 2. Benefits/Claims 20,000 8,736 20,000 3. Contractual Services 8,000 4,522 8,000 4. Legal Services 15,000 40,000 25,000 S. Professional Services 1,000 0 1,000 6. Supplies B Other 1,000 0 1,000 7. Sub-Total 46,000 53,258 56,000 8. Excess Loss Policy 265,000 9. Total Expenditures 46,000 53.258 321,000 REVENUES 6 RESERVES 10. In-Lieu Premiums 258,000 258,000 258,000 It. Interest 6 Miscellaneous 75,000 123.272 120,000 12. Allocation to Other Funds 10.000 0 0 12. Total Revenues 343,000 381,272 370,000 12. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 297,000 328,014 57.000 13. Reserves and Transfers 1,255,000 1,320,373 1,648,000 14. Ending Reserves 1,552,000 1,648,387 1,705,000 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _ JOINT WORKS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND PNjlATION +� 11 ,politan Or CIS, J sA en S c U m ay U U) = '< p S'ace 195Q y ggNGE COUNA 1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 CORF A.\LS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUM14ARY OF DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE A AND COMPARISON TO LAST YEAR 1989-90 1989-90 1988-89 BUDGET COMPARABLE DISTRICTI EQUITY BUDGET BEGINNING GRANT BUDGET PERCENT REQUIREMENTS RESERVES FUNDS —REQUIREMENTS 1 10.44X 10,724.000 11.350,000 287,000 9.859,000 (a) 2 28.78% 29.564.000 45.815,000 790.000 27.354.000 3 31.26% 32.112,000 39,217,000 858.000 29,540,000 5 5.12% 5.260.000 1,856.000 140.000 4.967.000 (a) 6 4.83% 4.962.000 1.776.000 133.000 4.711,000 (a) 7 6.84% 7.026.000 16,471,000 188.000 6,126.000 11 6.91% 7,098.000 2.592.000 190,000 6,791,000 (a) 13 0.13% 134.000 3.100,000 3.000 95.000 14 5.69% 5.845,000 156.000 5.537.000 (b) TOTAL 100.00% I 102.725.000 122.177,000 2.745.000 L 94.980.000 (a) Long-range financial projections indicate these Districts may need to issue debt in 1989-90 (b) Funds will be provided by required deposits form IRWD CORFR9 ELLS CAPITAL OVIA7 REVOLVING NOD SCBEDULL 64 5'I1;B9 10:01 AN SUNBURY 07 JOINT WORKS CGA57RVCTIOA RIDVIIENtNTS Page 1 1999-199D TO 1998-1996 A B C 0 L P G A I J I RSTINATN I ISTINATLD II REQUIRED WINAT10 I ESTIMATED ESTIMATED 1 ISTINATRO FIVE ISTINATID TIN COST TO PROJECT I C.I.P. II BODGE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUNIT 11 IRAN DUMB? HAS II CONPLIT9 TOTAL I 6130189 II 19H-90 I 1990-91 I 1991-12 I 19N-93 1 1993-94 II TOTAL I 199/-99 I TOTAL II PIOJICTS ..............I------------ I I............ 1------------ t............ I............ 1----------- I I------------ t............ ------------ I I ----------- I II I I I I II I I II 1. New and Rebudgeted Major Projects I I II I I I II I I I I II I I II A. Reclamation Plant 1 II II I II 1. Expansion to RD MID, PI-16-1 11,511,000 1 II 100,000 1 537.000 1 1,000,000 1 12,001,000 1 1,300,000 11 17,531,000 1 17,537,000 It 2. Ntadworks 90.2 1 Plant 10.1. PI-N/PI-11 19,455,000 1 15,455,000 11 4,000,000 1 1 II 1,000,000 1 4,500,001 It 3. Odor control facilities 1 11 1 1 II 1 11 a. covert for Primary Basins, P1-25 1,311,0001 1,281,000 11 100,0001 I II 100.000 1 I 111,001 II I. Foul Air Scrubber Syntax, PI.26 2,101,DOD 1 2.201,000 II 200,000 1 I II 100,000 1 I 200,060 11 1. Entrances/SecuritT/Interior loads/Landscaping PI-27 3,561,0001 1,561,000 11 900100D 1 500,000 1 600400 1 1 2,000,000 1 1 21000,000 II S. Prioary Clarifiers Nos. 6.15, PI-33 10,811,000 t 811,000 12,000,000 15,000,000 1 12,000,OOD I I,OD0,0001 II 40,000,000 1 1 /0,0001000 II 6. Digesters II-16 and Gas Kindling Systea, 71d4-1 18,760,000 E 205,000 12,000,000 13.555,0001 12,000,000 1 1,000,0001 II 31,555,000 1 I 31,555,000 II 7. Sludge Kindling Facilities, PI-34-2 22,500,000 1 100,000 It I0,000,DDD 1 10.000,000 1 2,100,000 1 1 22,400,001 1 I 22,140,000 11 R. Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 6 8, PI-35.1 2,553,000 1 243,000 II 2,250,000 1 100.000 1 1 1 If 2,350.000 1 1 2,351,000 II 9. Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 1 10, P1-33-2 1,500,000 1 11 1 1 2.000,000 I,SO0,000 1 I 3.500,000 1 1 315111011 11 10. Underground Tank Replaceaent At Plat 1, R-027-1 551,000 E 516,000 1 10,000 1 I I I 10,000 I 10,16011 11. Fuel System lnpmvemmts, R-D33-1 170,000 E 20,000 II 150,000 1 I II 150,000 I 150,000 [1 12, Central Air Compressor Station 230,ODD I 1 50,000 1 200,000 1 1 II 250,000 1 I 25D,000 II 13. Electrification Project 2.100,000 1 II 100,000 1 1,000,o0D 1 1.000,000 1 1 II 2,100.000 1 I 2,100,000 II 11. Primary Trauenl 36 MOD 16,250,000 I ID0,000 3,000,000 9.000,000 4,150,000 1 II 16,250,000 1 I 16,250,Doo II 15. Primary Treatment 36 ROD 16,250,000E I 1 II 1 16,250,000 1 16,250,00011 16. Belt Prena 11 Units) 11,10D,000I I 1,500,0001 6,400,0001 6,400,0001 II 14,300,0001 1 14,300,00011 17. Raw Sewage Emergency Bypass 1,592,000 I II 1 1 1 II 1 1,992,000 1 1,952,000 It 18. DAF's: 3 1 10' Diameter I,I60.000 1 100.000 1 1.500,000 1 1.500,000 1 760,000 1 11 4,160,000 1 1 4.160,000 It 59. Solids Storage 11 Bins) 10,117,000 1 I1 1 1 1 11 1 5,577,000 1 5,577,000 II 4,600,000 N. Standby Power Generation 7,115,000 1 11 1 1 1 2,300,000 1 5,435,000 11 7,735,000 1 1 7,735,004 11 21. Meoitmrlm9/Control System 5,070,0DO I 1,000.000 1 2.410,000 1 I,00,000 1 1 11 5,070,000 1 1 5,016,064 II 22. Digesters: 2 1 11D' Diameter 9,110,OOD I I 900,000 3,200,000 1 3,200,000 11 7,100,000 1 1,800,000 1 1,100,000 11 N. Remove 7rickliog Filters lu 1,100,000 I I 1,300,000 1 11 1.300,000 1 1 1,100,000 11 21. IN, Electrical Fewer Distribution 2.477,000 I II i I 800,000 11 800,000 1 1.671,000 1 2.177,00D 11 25. 40 DID Oxygen Activated Sludge 6 DAFE 61.461,000 1 I 11 1 655.000 1 655,000 11 64.501,000 H. misc. ProjectE 10,000,0001 II 1,000,0001 1.000,0001 1,000,000 1 1,000,0001 1,000,000 11 5,000,000 1 5,000,000 1 10,0ao,00011 ...........1 ---------- ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I I ----------- ---------- ----------- 11 ----------- SDB-TOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANT 1 339,951,000 42,421,000 11 11,310,000 1 50,212,000 1 51,600,000 1 34,610,000 1 12,335,000 11 195,067,060 32,951,000 I 221,018,000 11 61d01,000 ...........I .......... I I .......... I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I I ----------. 1 ---------- ----------- 11 ----------- CORB19 1.ILS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TURD SCMIDUII 0-1 5J17/119 10:01 MY SUMMARY Of JOIXT FORKS M13IEOC1301 R!oull.!MIYTS Page 2 1919-1990 70 1991.1999 A B C 0 1 R G B I J I [STIMATIO I ISTIME79D IIQUIRID I ISTIMATID I ISTIMATID I WIMATID I ISTIMATIO IIV6 I 6S13RAIRD 1 711 I MST 70 PROXY C.I.P. BUCG11 SUDGRT I BUDGET I BUDCIT I SWAP 11 FIAT I BUDGET I Text COMPLETI TOTAL I 1f)0/19 II 1119-90 119D-91 1591-92 I I992-93 1991-51 II TOTAL 1994-99 1 TOTAL P10JE[Ts -------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ I------------ I----------- ------------ 1------------ ------------ ----------- B. Treatment 11ant ! I I 1 II 1 1. Additional 105 Boot Digester 3,05,000 II I I II 21145,000 1 2,10,000 II 1,150,000 2. Dpmntt00s Building, Pi-2]-S-I 3,125,000 E II 500,000 1,800,000 825,000 I II 3,125.0001 3,125,00011 3. Upgrade Activated Sludge System, P2-50 L300,0001 II 100,000 1 1,000,000 1 4,000,0001 2,700,0001 It 71800,0001 I 71600,00011 4. Additional OAF 2,600,000 E 100,000 1,000,000 1 11000,000 1 500,000 1 I 2,600,000 1 2,600,000 11 S. Odor Central facilities II I I I I II I I II a. Primary 1161os •A• thin Q. Covers, P2-12 5,511.000 E 5,064,000 11 450,000 1 1 II 450,0001 I 150,000 II b. Foul Air ScruEbers system, P2-33 6.583,0001 61333,000 11 250,000 1 I II 250,0001 I 250,DDO 11 C. lapronnts to Grit facility B, Billings Falls] 1 11 1 I II I II and Distribution structure A, P2-34 6.209,000 I 6,159,000 50,000 1 II 50,DM I 50,000 II 1, Landscape Rod Support Facilities I I I II I i. Warehouse Building, P2-35-2 4,950,0001 11 500,000 1 21200,000 1 21250,000 1 II [,950,0001 I 41150,00011 b. Intimater Building , P2-35-3 1,200,DOo 1 II 100,000 1 2,500,0001 1,600,000 1 I II 4.200.0001 1 1,200,00611 c. Constructive Management Office, 12-35-4 11211,000 1 S00,000 1 700,000 1 16,000 1 I I 1,201,006 1 I I,H1,010 11 d. Phase 11 Site Rod Security Improvements, R-35.5 2,300,0001 100,000 1 11300.000 1 900,0001 I II 2,300,0051 I 2,IDo'lle II 7. Mile Modifos 6 Improvements to facilities, 12-37 7,162,000 1 4,862,000 It 2,100,000 1 11 I 2,300,000 1 I 2,300,006 11 1. Rehabilitation of Digesters I,J,[,4,M,Y 6 0, P2-39 1.171,000 178,000 11 31000,000 1 1,000,000 1 1 I 1 1'015,010 1 1 6,000,900 11 9. Process Control Computer Molitor Improvements, 12-10 270,000 20,000 It 250,000 1 1I II 250,100 1 I 2S0,000 II 10. Primary tratmat 24 IGD,R-41 11,300,0001 11 510,000 1 6,I00,DOD 1 1,4001000 1 1,000,0001 II 11,)OO,DDQ I I 11,301,060 II 11. 0mdergre0nd Tani leplacemenl, R-027-2 551,000 1 518,000 11 10,000 1 1 1 1 II 10,000 1 10,000 11 12. fuel System inproveents, 1-033-2 170.0001 20,00011 150.000 1 1 1 I II ISo,loO I 1 1S0,00011 1). Overflow Pulp Station 250,000 1 50,0001 200,000 1 I 250.000 1 1 250,00411 if. Electrification Project 6,500,000 2D0,000 1 1,000,0001 2,300,000 1 I 6,500,000 1 I 6,500,00011 15. Solids Storage: 2 Bans 5,200,000 E I 4DO,DDD I 2,400,000 2,100,000 E I 5,200.000 1 I 51200,000 11 16. Potable Water Distribution System 3.809,000E I 1 300,000 300,0001 3,509,000 3,809,000 11 17. Monitoringicoatrol System 5,330,000 II 30,000 600,000 1 3,700,000 1 1,000,000 1 11 5,330,000 1 1 5,330,100 II 16. Standby Plant Generation 9,200,000 1 1 I 1 91200,000 1 91200,000 11 19. Plant Voter Pump Station 1,170,000 II I I I I 11170,0001 1,170,00011 2D. RISC. Projects 10,000,000 II 1,000,D0o 1 1,000,0001 1.000,000 1 1,ODD,o00 1 1,000,00011 5,000,0001 5,000,0001 10,000,00011 ...........I ---------- I ---------- I .......... I ---------- I -----.---- I ---------- I I ----------- I ---------- I ----------- it ----------- SUB-10TAL - TRIATAW PIAMT 2 111,561,000 1 23.104,000 11 16,419,00E 1 25,950,000 1 26,663,000 1 1.600.000 1 1.300,000 11 72,603,000 1 21,011,000 1 93,617,000 11 1,79,E00 ........... .......... I ---------- I ---------- ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 11 ----------- I ---------- I ----------- 11 ----------- 1 1 I 1 1 4 1 / 1 1 1 4 1 J 1 1 1 I / 1 CORTS9 I.ILS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE 8-1 5111119 10:01 AN SUMMARY OF JOIN} VORIS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 1 19894990 TO 1990-1999 A B C 0 8 L G B I J R ISTIXA1ID ESTIMATED I RIQUIRID 8STIMAT80 89TIMATIO E ISTIMA}ID E ESTIMATED II I VI I IS}5XAT10 }6M II COS} }0 PROJBCT C.I.P. DODGE? I BUDGET BUOGIT BUDGET BUDGET II TEAR I AUGUST I TZAR II COMPLITI -- 70TA4PROJECTS-- C. Eeclaaation Plant Sites I II I I I I II I II 1. Site Acquisition 15,000,000 II 1,500,0001 10,500,000 E I II 1s,00i,000 I 15,000,000 II 2. Reclamation Plant 62,000,000E �I - 100_000I - 100_000 i:B00t000I 1150005000 118,000,000 3950005000E i3t000:000I 62,ODOt000 I ----------- SUB-707AL - RECLAMATION PLANTS 77,000 000 II II 1 600 OOo I 10 600 000 i B00 000 I II 000 000 I IB 000 000 51 000'5000 23 OOOt000 I 77 000 000 II ----------- D. Interpliat and Join[ II II I I I I 1. Admin. Building Expin. 6 Rehab. J-7-1, J-7-5 5,710,000 3,740,000 II 2,000,000 E 11 2,000,000 E I 2,000,0001E 2. rehab/Cone gist Lab 0o Office it ?It 1, J-11-1 040,000 1 11 50,000 E 50,000 E 100,000 E 11 900,000 E 1 900,000 1E 3. Ootfill Booster Station, Jd S,J-1SA 27,269,000 1 25,719,00011 1,500,000 1 1I I 1,500,000 E 1,500,000 I. Central Laboratory, J-17 1,775,000 E 175,0001E I,000,000 3,000,000 E 500,000 I 7,500,000 E 7,500,000 11 S. Central Damietta, facility II 1 I I II II 1. Iquipaeet Preporckite, J-IfA 22,000,0001 5,000,00011 u,000,000 1 1,000,000 1 1,000,000 1 1,000,100 1 1,000,00011 17,0DO,000 1 1 17,000,000 11 In. Imissiog Pnrcbase, J-15D 3,010,000 E 3,050,000 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 C. Plant 1 facility, J-19-1 15,799,500 E 799,500 11 31000,0001 6,100,0001 1,000,0001 1 11 15,000,000 1 1 15,000,000 11 d. Plant 2 facility, J-19.2 25,799,500 E 799,500 II 9,000,0001 12,000,0001 1'000,0011 1 II 25,000,000 I I IS1010,000 II 6. Warehouse/Maintenance Bldg,. 6 Oil Dock, J-20 3,184,0001 1,381,000 11 2,500,0001 1 II 2,500,0001 I 2,500,000 11 7. Waste Gas Flares,J-21, J-21A 762,000 I 112,0001E 650,000 E I I I 650,000 E 630,000 II 1. Outfall 6 Booster Pulp stations II I I II II 1. Replacement of TO- Outfall Sever, J-22-1 (Land) 2,029,000 E 29,0001E 1,000,0001 900,0001 100,0001 II 2,000,0001 21000,000 11 b. Replace Outfall He. 1 Land Section, J-22-2 2,IIB,OOo 1 11 2,000,000 2,000,000 II8,0001 2,111,000 11 C. New Surge Tower No. 1, J-22-1 1,300,0001 II 1,000,000 II 1,000,000 100,000 E I,Io0,000 11 d. }sop Cl2 Station for Outtall No, 1 2,600,0001 11 1 1 II 2,600,000E 2,600,000 II I. Second Discharge leader CURB 'C' 3,960,0001 11 1 1 100,000 400,000 3,510,000 E 3,160,000 f. Extend 7B' to Deep Water Silb 120. Oradell 36,209,0001 II1 1I II I 291019,o00I 29,089,000 7,200,000 9. Operations Building, J-23-1 6 2 3,500,000 E 8,000 1,500,000 E 2,000,000 E I I II 3,500,000 I 3,504,000 II 10. influent floneter and test fac111ty,J-21121A/HB 500,000 E II 500,000 E I I II 500,000 E I $00,000 II 11. Personnel Building at ?It I, J-26 908,000 E E1 100,004 500,000 E 398,000 I 906,000 E 911,000 12. Ileclriral Power Systems Rebabllitatioa 3,000,000 E II I I I II 1 3,000,000 E 3,000,0001E 13. Earthquake Preparedness 7,305,000 E 11 400,000 E 400,000 E 130,000 330,ice 330,000 E 1,790,000 E 1,525,00D 1 3,115,000 3,190,000 14, laterpliat Ficilite,, 1-9 II I 11 II a. 120- laterplant line 21,600,000 E II 2,000,000 1 12,400,000 1 12,400,000 1 E I 27,600,000 1 1 27,600,000 II b, taterpl,st Utility Chase 1,010,000 E II BIO,oDo 31600,000 3,600,000 I II 8,010,000 I I,DI0,000 11 C. Industrial Water Line 600,000 E I 60,000 270,000 270,000 600,000 I 600,000 d. Digester Gas Line 900,000 100,000 100,000E 100,000 I 900,000E I 900,000 e. COBRNllicatlaa, Cable 120,0DO I 10,000 1 $5,000 1 55,000 1 1 II 120,000 1 I 120,600 11 15. Sludge Disposal I I I I 11 1 I 11 a. CONPOSL Demonstration Plant 9,000,000 E I 2,700,000E 6,IDO,DOO I 9,S0U,000 1 I 9,000,000,11 B. land Aqulsitioo 22,000,000 E II I 1,000,D0o 11 L,ODO,000 1 21,000,000 1 22,o0o,000 11 C. Landfill Developaent Phase I 20,600,000 E 11 13,000,000 13,DD0,00011 15,600,000 d. Coaposl facility 50,100,000 E I I II 5,010,000 E 5,040,000 IE 45,160,000 It. Busbard latetpliat Replacement 26,370,000 I II 12,000,000 1 12,000,000 It 11,170,000 17. list fro3ects 1000,000 II - 5005000 I - soo5oi0 I - SOOt000 I - s00,o00 - 5005000 I - 25S0o50D0 I 353005000 - 550005000 I ........... SUB-TOTAL - IN71R7LAU} 1 JOINT 355,536 000 10 966 000 I U SIO 000 I /7 075 000 I 8 11] 000 1 S70 000 @ 910 000 111 9B1 000 91 Ofit 000 2t8 OSO 000 II B6:S2D5000 ---- SUB-70TAL - MAJOR PROJECTS 190191E 000 I 106 S73 000 II IOo.510 000 I 133 B77 000 I 111 106 000 6S 710 000 11 165 000 I ISS 65i 000 171 017:000 I 636 69S 000 II IS7:671:OOD CORP89_1.1ts 5117189_10:01 AM CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING ?END SCRIDULI B-I SUMMARY OF Jet MT volts COMSTBOCTION PIQUIRININTS Page 1 1989-1990 to 1999-1999 A B C D I 1 D M I J A ISTINA71D I ISTIHATHD REQUIRED I ESTIMATED I ESTIMATED I ISTINATID I ISTINATID II 11VE I ISTIHATIO 1 790 COST TO ?toilet I C.I.P. BUDGET BUDGET I BUDGIT BOUGHT BUDGE? II TSAR BUDGET I TEAM II COMPLITI TOTAL I 6130109 1919-10 I 1990-51 I 1991-92 I 1992-93 I 1993-94 TOTAL I 1994-99 TOTAL PROJECTS 2. Special Projects I II I II I II II I I II I II A. mister PIan161B RepOrt6 I II I I I II I I 1. Action Plan - Environmental Assexsaent Program 601,0001 107,000 200,000 E 300,0061 I I II 500,000 E I 500,00011 2, Action Plan - COmlanity, Outreach Program 342,000.1 3o2,000 25,000 1 10,609 1 5,000 I II 10,001 I 10,000 11 3. Action Flat - Facilities Plan/Master Plan 2,337,000 I 2,287,000 II 50,000 1 1 1 1 II 50,000 1 1 50,ODO II I. Action Plan - Legislative/Regulatory Program 43,000E 10,000 II 25,000 I I I 25,000 I 25,000 S. Attloo Plan - Financial Plan 90,000 I 80,000 II 10,000 I I I I 10,000 I 10,000 II 6. Active Plan - NPDE6 Perait Application 53,000E 33,000 II 20,000 I I I 20,000 I 20,000 7. Action Plan - Management 8 Coordination 36,000E 26,000 II 10,000 I II 10,000 1 I 10,00011 B. Solids Treatment and Disposal Projects 196,0001 46,00011 50,000 I 50,Ooo 1 50,0001 1 II 150,000 1 " I 150,00011 C. Deep Octal Disposal Evaluation 519,0001 579,00011 1 I I 10,000 11 10,0001 1 10,000 II D. Air Quality Control Progral 1 II 1 I I I 11 1 1 II 1. Air Toxic$ Inventory 1AB250BI 100,0001 II 50,0001 25,0001 25,000 I II 100,0001 100,00011 2. VOC/vas RACE Demonstration Ptogral 250,000 E II 50,000 E 75,000 75,000 25,000 E 25,000 II 250,000 E 250,000 II 1. Cbetical Handling and Control Improvements 25,000E II 10,000E 15,000E I II 25,000 I 25,000 II P. Oman Discharge foapllwe Program I I I II I I 1. BioassT Project 50,0001 11 15,000 1 20,0001 15,0001 1 II 50,000 1 1 50,00011 2. ocean Monitoring Studies 150,000 1 II 50,000 I 50,0001 50,0001 1 II 150,000 1 1 150,000 It 3. Toxins Reduction Evalualloo (TEE) Project 250,0001 II I 50,000 1 200,0001 I II - 250,000 1 1 250,000 II G. Soiree Control and Amite Management Program I I I I I I II I 1 11 1. In-House Hazardous Waste Management Program 25,000 1 15,000 1 10,000 1 11 25,060 1 25,000 11 2. 7runAline Monitoring 320,000 20,000 150,000 1 150,000 1 I 320,000 1 320,000 II 3. Waste Minimization 70,000 30,000 10,000 E I 70,000 I 70,000 11 1. Pertinent Household Waste Collection Sites 250,000E 125,000E 125,000E I I I 250,000 250,000 II H. Laboratory Development Program 125,000E II 25,000 E 100,000E I II 125,000 125,000 II ----------- ---------- ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- 11 ----------- SOF-TOTAL - SPECIAL PROJECTS 5,111,000 I 3,178,000 56S,000 I 595,000 120,000 I 25,000 35,000 11 1,640,000 1 I 1,610,000 II ...........I ---------- I I ---------- I ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- II ........... I ---------- ........... 11 ----------- 3. Eguipmeat items 32,S50,090I II 1,650,000 I I,SO0,000 1,250,000 1,250,000E 1,250,060 II 6,900,000 E 6,250,0001 13,150,0o011 19,100,000 ........... .......... I ---------- ---------- I ---------- ---------- I ---------- I I ----------- I ---------- I ----------- ----------- TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL F.EQUIREHINfS 920,616,0001 110,093,000 II 102,72S,000 135,932,0001 113,016,000 67,015,0001 15,450,000 11 16/,198,000 177,287,000 641,485,000 117,078,000 I ::::::::::: 11 , I ::::::::: :t*%zzzzzzI 11 1zzr=zz=t=t 70AL WITH St INFLATION PEI YEAH 1,181,791,116 110,05J,800 102,725,000 112,728,600 124,666,290 77,570,239 55,211,118 502,912,877 250,054,039 752,997,716 318,740,400 ............. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... f ! t I I I I I I - 1 4 t I t l 4 1 1 4 4 4 4 1 4 1 1 4 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SCHEDULE C COAF EQUIPMENT BUDGET 4/I8189 1989-50 TRUCES A OTHER MACHINE COMMON INSIA 6 TEST SAFETY OFFICE DEPT VEHICLES MOBILE EQ. EQ G toots EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT 6 TRAFFIC EQ FIX 6 EQ 07HER TOTAL NO. DEPARTMENT SSS61-1-00 55562-1-00 55563-N-00 55S64-1-00 55566-1-00 55567-1-00 5556E-1-00 55569-1-00 BUDGET ...- --........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... 2150 Management Office Managesenl Support 15,000 15,000 Personnel 100.000 55,800 1S5,800 2210 Director Of Finance 15,000 15,000 2220 Accounting 61,800 61.800 2230 Purchasing/Warehousing 3,000 10,000 13.000 2240 Information Systems 25,000 11.735 31,350 11,500 105.388 266,973 3310 General Superintendent 11,600 10.600 14,550 66.750 3330 Plant Maintenance 43,000 17,700 95,150 5,000 160.650 3340 Collection Facilities 8,000 31.200 8,100 ITS 47,475 JSSO Aschaniul Maintenance 25,400 65,000 15,915 3,m 22.025 1111900 3360 Electrical Maintenance 21,200 1.889 4,081 2S,000 5.678 2,619 60,467 3370 Instrument. Maintenance 11,60 12,050 4,805 3,880 32,335 3380 Treatment Plant Ober. 29,225 16,850 10.000 S,S00 11.000 70,575 3510 Director of Technical Bar. 12,630 12,630 3520 Compliance 38.010 38,010 3580 Laboratories 3,200 I04,490 3.310 191.000 3590 Industrial Waste 32,000 15,050 16,000 2,700 19.950 85,700 3710 Director of Engineering 2,700 2.700 3720 Planning and Design 8,500 71,000 79.500 3790 Construction Managesenl 41,500 46,600 46,450 7,485 3,800 16,900 162,535 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- T07AL 89.90 REQUESTS 316,200 163.549 1a9,N06 137.050 283,305 30,770 569,112 0 1.650.000 --'-------- ----------- -----"-"--- ........... -...-"-""-- ----------- ----------- ---........ , ......-"--- a 4 o 1 4 4 1 4 4 1 A 4 1 1 ti t :01989 1.ILS CAPITAL 6MAY REVOLVING POND CLASSIFICATION Of BUDGETED PROJECTS It REVENUE PIOGRAN CATEGORIES SCHEDULE B-2 FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 Page 1 8 f 0 1 P G 1EQUIRiC 11PLACINNT INPIOVID ADDITIONAL I RAPLACINN7 INPROVID ADDITIONAL BUDGE? R TREATMENT CAPACITY 6 7RIATNINT CAPIICITT 1919.9E AACOXS71 RICOXSTA 1. New and Iebudgeted Nator Protects A. Retlamatilw Pilot 1 1. lapansiom to BO AGO, PI.16-1 100,000 loot 100,000 2, Missile No.2 I Mist 10.1, ?1-2001-01 1,000,000 lot 601 11600.000 211001000 J. odor Central facilities a. Coven for Primary Basins. 11-25 I 100.000 100E 100,000 I. Foal Air Scrubber System, PI.26 :00.000 100E 200,000 4. lntraaaell5ecmrltyllaterior 1madsILasdfCOpmog Pt-:i 900.000 50% 59% 450,000 450,000 S. Primary Clarifiers gas. 6.15, PI-SS 12,000,000 100E 12,000,000 6. Digesters 11-16 aad Gas Doodling System, PI.71-1 11,000,600 201 sot 21400,000 1,600,00e 7. Sludge Ramdling facilities, PI-3I-2 10,000.000 501 50% 5,000,000 5,000,000 8. Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 a 8. P1.95-1 :.501000 loot 2,250.000 9. Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 a 10, PI-35.2 loot 10. Underground Tank leplaCtieftt At Floor 1, HIM 10,000 1001 I01000 11. Fuel System IAprovemeats. 1-033-1 ISO1006 100% 150,000 12. Central Air Osapresmor Station 50% 50% 11. Electrlflcetloa Protect 100.000 100% 1001600 14. Primary ireetfeat 36 NGD 100,000 1001 100.000 15. Primary Treatment l6 KID ISO% 16, Belt Presses 11 laitel 1001 17. law Sewage laergency Bypass loot 10. DAPs: J 0 10' Diameter (00,000 1001 100,000 19. Solids Storage II stool 1001 20. Staidly Power Geearation 15ol 21. MsaitoriaglComarol System 1,000,000 tool 1.000,000 22. Digesters: 2 1110' Disaster loot 27. always trickling filters 163 1 100E 24. l2kv Electrical Power Distribution 100E 25. 10 NGD Oeygea Activated Sludge a DAI's 100E 26. misc. Protects 11000.000 bat 201 101 600.000 iD0,000 100.000 12,510,00o SOB-TOTAL - RICLANATION PLANT 1 a.310100D fii0,000 51,ES0,000 COAl39 1.its CAPITAL OUTLAY SHOVING FUND ^-USSIIICA}ION Of BUDGITID PAOJICTS BY RIVIA01 PROGRAM CATIGOIIIS SCNROULI B-2 FISCAL TIAN 1989-90 Page 2 A B D 1 f G RIGUIIID 1 ILPLACRXRT 11PPOVID ADDITIONAL A9PLACINMT INPIOVID ADDITIONAL WD6R S TRIAUJIT CAPA[I}T i TRIATNIII CAPACITT 19P!-90 AICOASTI AIf0A5T1 B. Treatment Pleat 2 1. Additional 165 TOOL %gestet 10% 2. operations Building, P2-23-5-1 500.100 1001 500.000 3. Upgrade Activated slvdge System. P2.50 100.000 1001 100,000 1. Additional OAF 100.000 loci 100,040 5. Odor Coatrol Facilities a. Primary Bastes 'A' tbru 'C' Cuvers, P2-31 450.000 100% 450.000 I. foil Air scrabbers system. PZ-33 :50,000 loot :50.000 C. Ispronols Ln Grit facility R. Billings Tunael and Distribution Warner' A. P2-31 WHO 1001 ( 50,000 6. Landscape and Support facilities I i. VireBouse Buildima, P2-JS-f $00.000 loot SWOON b. Xaictesue BBaldiag , V-35-3 100.006 1001 100.000 C. Construction Management Office, P245-1 $00.000 Ioat 510.000 d. Phase II Site and Security loprovesemts, P2-35-5 IOO,000 100% 100,000 7. Misc Xodifas a Isprovesents to facilities, P2-37 2.300.000 loot :,300,000 1. Ithabil:tltioa 0! Digesters I,J,6L,N,N a 0. P2-39 3.000,000 100% 3,000,000 1. Process Control :ospater Monitor Jsproveients. P2.1D :50.000 50% Hi I2L 000 !E5.000 to. Primary Treatment Es NGD.P2-11 100.000 1001 590.000 I1. Undergromad Lot Replacement. R427-3 II.000 1 1001 ...... 12. Joel System IBproeemtats. 1-033-2 I50,000 loci 150,000 13. Overflow PUP Station ID01 Is. llectrification Prolett l00,000 100% 200,100 15. Solids Storage: 2 Bins 100% IS. Potable water Distribution $raise I 1'301 if. Molitor!B91control system JD.00c 501 SOt IS,000 IS A00 it. Standby Power Generation loci 19, Plant water Pulp Station loci 20. MISC. Pro7rts L000.000 to% -'01 a-01 600.000 E00.000 -'00,000 ROB-}OVAL - '.!SA}NfNi PLANT ! 1.).090.OD0 7.950:000 I - 900,000 1.290:coo :OIF99 i.I1i CIPITIL OMUT GROWING Trip :W51TIUTi%of BUGETIO PIWIMS IT allies[ pimm%UfOI115 SCIRDOU 1-E KSCAL Tug 1969-90 Page 1 A e C 0 3 P G RICOIRIL 21PUCU! :RMID A%ITIOBAL I ftpUCU% Uf10VID AODinoo L j PROGn S TalA"IR UPACITT 4 TREAT CAPACITT 1919-90 RICOUTR R9CORSTI C. Lecla tloa Plant Gates :. Si:e Acquisition g.asA,OOA SAI 01 I 21211,000 :,ESO,AAO :. ieclaeatlu Plant 3 Am. so 57i S•% 50.000 50.000 SOB-yMAL - 31CUMUM FPS 1.600,000 2,300,000 E.1oo.ec, 0. laterplant led Joint - 1. Adun. Euildiag loran. A Leub. 3 1.1. J-7-5 I ±1000.000 10% lot lot 1 Ao,0o/ a0.010 1.40/.000 2. RAWCOUT. list. tab it pal 1 In Otllce. J-!I-1 1 5^..Oas loot 1 50.000 3. Ortfill Booster Station. J-!S.J-I:A !,`.0AJa0 701 1 201 1.050.001 !:LOBO ' R. Logical Laboratory, J-17 i 1300.040 flat 4,100:400 S. Central Brw%tio,flulity 1. luipleat propensities, J-19A I 11.000,000 Sol Sot 5.500.000 5,500.000 b. biomass Petcuse. MOB C. ?lilt 1 !ullltT, J-19-1 1.8001000 51% ion :.500.000 L:as,000 d. Plan! '. lactlttl. J-19-1 i.000.000 50% S% j OWN. LSOO,OOo 6. olse'Nustfunce a ides. ISA,100 1total651,Ias A Oil sock, J-25 E.500.060 5a1 Sol LESp'009 I 1,250,000 1, garte I. 0u[flli A Buster Pup$Latlw$ a. Replacement of TB' Britoil Semen. J-:2,1 ILoad) I,0/0.0% fOBi I,Oo0.as0 ). Replace Outfall ea. 1 Laid tactics. 3- I IOOi r. New Sorge?net so. 1, J-'N last d. Temp C12 Starts. for 0 tfall ec. 1 !ast e. Second Discharge HERZ Idea 'C' I tat 34% f. Intend 78' to Deep Utar Vitt 120' Utfall I 1301 9. operatic., Staining, J-E1-1 S : 1.91.000 501 50% j '11,001 I 751.000 N. Influent flowerer and Test tic llty.l`-l:?:b:IB 500 DAD 100% j 100,000 , 11. Feistiest Building at Pit !, ld9 % '000 IOOt Ias.D00 12. Electrical Pacer System,Rouralut¢g loot ❑. tar%Ouake Preparedness 400.000 1001 440,100 11. Interplant Militia. I.? 1. '_'o' Iaterplut Ill, :,840,000 . ill 50% :10.000 I E,51a.otO I. isterplut ftil#y West H0.011 :11 lot 153.000 /71.asp ! c. Iuutnml later Line WOOD Sot 50% I0.000 l/,Vas I. minister Gas Lt., 100.1 5% 50% 50.000 e, lau,uratilos Cult 0.100 S/i 501 5,000 5,000 I!. Slide, slag wal j a. Cwposl Demonstutlaa Plant in 501 I. Land AnuiSILlw iJl :at c. Landfill DAIAI.P,est %ase I :d1 SOt d. Compost lacll:[y :It 50% 15. Bombard Interplant Replace...t at :of :7. ease Project, 540,Goo 401 j Hi 201 100,000 100.000 ....... I MMOTAL - IRiIIPLtrt 1 401" 11,511,Ias li,U1,000 3,1as.010 EE.fEi,Ul SUMOTAL - MAJOR PROJICTS 100,510,000 31,/93 000 51200,000 57,1.7,00a COAP89 L34S CAPITAL 0"LAY RIVOLVING ➢Igo :LASSIP3CATIO1 GP BOOGBTIO PROJKC75 BY RIVINUI PROGRAM CATEGORIIS SCHIDOLE 2-2 FISCAL TEAR 1989-90 Page 1 9 B C D I G REQUIRED BEPLACINNE IMPROVED ADDITIONAL RIPLACAMNT IMPROVED RIQUIRID BUDGIT B CAEATMINT CAPACITY 6 TREATMENT CAPACITY 1989-90 RECORDER RICONSTR ;. Special Projects 1. Paste[ planjIII Reports 1. Action Plan - Environmental Assessment Program 200,000 LOOT 200,000 2. Action Plan - Cosmuaity Outreach Program 2S.000 ton 25.000 7. Action Plan • !scllitles Plaalm ester ?Ian 50,000 i5oi 50,000 a. ActlOn Plan - Leglslativeileguletory Program 25,000 104% 25,000 S. Action Plan - Financial Plan 10,000 t00% 10,000 6. Action Plan - RYDER Permit Implicating 20.000 1001 20,000 7. Action Plan - Management i Coordination 10,000 100E 10,000 S. Solids Treatment and Disposal Project: WOOD 1001 50,000 C. Deep Ocean Disposal Evaluation 100E D. Air Quality Control ?sons. 1. Air Toxlcs Inventory IASJSBB1 5010DO 100E 50,000 2. VOUROG BACT Dncns[ratloa Program 50,000 toot 50,000 1. Chemical Handling and Control [mproveoeu[s IQ,goo Two% 10.000 !. Ocean Discharge Cgep113nte P[ggla0 I. BJgeasy Project 15.000 loot 1`.1000 2. Ocean Monitoring Studies 50,000 100% 50,000 3. Toxits Reduction Evaluation ITRBI Project 100E G. Source Control and waste Managesea[ Pngran 1. !a-HUU6e Hazardous waste Management Program 15,000 100E 15,000 2. Trunktlae RDnitoling 20,000 !Do% 20,000 3. waste NinSmstatlon 30,000 I001 30,000 a. permanent Rcusebold waste Collection Sites 125.000 100% 121,000 A. Laboratory Development Program 2f.000 loot 25 000 SOB-TOTAL • SPECIAL PROJECTS SfiS,0o0 IiS.000 340.000 -.--...... .......... .......... ....... S. Equipment items I,6SO.00D lot 60% 30% 165,000 190,000 193.000 .......... '37" .;Do .......... .......... TOTAL JOINT VORIS CAPITAL IEQOJRINERTS 1 OE,12S,000 71.6SI,o00S2.000 q i RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 - 7: 30 P.M. 1 ` l ~ FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5104/89 PAGE 1 E - REPORT NUMBER APOJ _ UM ON TRrrve tmar CLAIMS PAtD 05/30/B9 POSTING DATE 05/16/89 ^oAN7-N0� •'ENDOR— AROWIi OES Co IeT rnu 099451 A.M. SCSI COMPANY $90.1O PUBLICATION f111—. fi 563 06 —.`.^,Gt;,BBR6NGd6RV2G68 R46T 6 099453 ACME WELDING $3,915.70 TRAILER REPAIR 199454 AOVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. $1.391,678.97 CONSTRUCTION 0-15 099455 A7ERICAN COMPUTER '265.00 ---- —A}RIA6-ptl0iG6 ---- 099456 AMERICAN COMPUTER SUPPLY s27.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES ..b 099457 AMERICAN MEDIA. INC. $557.95 VIDEO 9456 •LE ALCAA�LCNMICAL�11^^• • 11.4_^°.•• - SILK IT7 099459 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $4,366.32 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7 Z 399460 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. s40.04 MECHANICAL PARTS -� Ogg-,- -4­R&u&_sysT a& tl.31B..El -- NOTEGR6 6-06 099462 ARATEA SERVICES. INC. 1540.35 UNIFORMS 099463 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $99.341.22 MIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 �.T 689464 BAY E77� SUPPLY s954 ^0 fiAPS'TY SIIPPLLR4 099465 BACHARACH. INC. 3221.4E INSTRUMENT MAIM 1199466 P.Y. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. f61940.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-25626.P2-32.33.34.37 -00 C99468 —BAXTER}SCIENTIFIC PR --LABC� W C9946B BEATER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $14146.85 LAB SUPPLIES 499969 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES. INC. 5146.85 CAR WASH WM 1- TICKETS mA 99471 ROBERT BEIN.WILRERD0.0ROST b 664 B5 - --------ENGINJOINT-SERVICE - —_ n 099472 BOISET CASCADE I OFFICLIAME FROST 6 AS $ $1.641.32 OFFICE SERVICES 80-I44-5.89-I4 09947E BOISE CAECADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 3L641.SL OFFICE ARTS C7CORP 09947 BOYLE ENGINEERING ILRIN6 $64.821.93 NATCRMTG SERVICES E6 88-I05 099415 BRENNN-FIEDLEP L ASSOC.. INC. 3386.64 INSTRUMENT GBPPLI¢S M ! ' ETREE 55 0 BG WATER 09947 BROWN f CALWELL $220.00 LAG SERVICES 099078 BROWN f CALDYELL CONSULTING f27.518.56 - ENGINEERING SERVICES P3-37 :---A 099480'.. —._--BURKE-ENGINEERING CO. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES -1 099481 BUPNC G. STNEERIXG CO. $44.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES CA 0994tl1 6ARY G. STR EEO 3460.56 PlTTY CAStl REIMBURSEMENT _--Y9948! H-N-REEBNDI T-3ONdM6 08 0378+a0- 099483 CS COMPANY $3,342.11 VALVE C99484 CSI-CALTROL 14.503.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS .. ._—. 4"465--..—. _.BAk-KASS-FOP-RESEAR".r NC----:}}.}i ______.____ 699486 CAL-FAC CHEMICAL CO., INC. $60.05 CHEMICALS 099467 CARLETON ENGINEERS $4.466.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES -CAR0kl4 EN6}NEER' —iBWrV1150r47 —----eNGIN88RIBG-6ERViC¢6--J-kS.f}-20=.--_- ., 099489 CASE POWER f EQUIPMENT 31.938.39 I== PARTS 099496 CENTURY SAFETY INS7. f BUFF. f118.08 SAP6TY SUPPLIES 1. ._-_. 094492 94493 --'-CHHEEMM SERVICE CE-COr_---_-----A2$45 O.100---- __--W SUPPLIES 099493 CXEMYEST INDUSTRIES. INC. f80.574.40 FERIC CHLORIDE M.O.I1-09-09 099495 CHEVRON U.S.A.. IMC. $13.595.30 OIL A GREASE 099496 CHRISTEVE CORP. 1804.152.T5 - COMBTWCTI0N 5-31 , D N FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 5/64/89 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OS/10/89 POSTING GATE O5/30/89 ,•� .WARRANT NO __ MS.NP.O IL 4MOUNT DESCRIPTION C99497 WILLIAM N. CLARKE 596.00 MEETING MERGE 09949R CORINNE CLAWSON $423.05 MEETING MUSE _ ^I 099499 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY $323.40B.00 INSURANCE M.O. 4-12-89 � 099500 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF 52.080.00 ALUMINUM PLATING °t 099501 — TRUCK PARTS 099502 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 52.632.01 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 099563 CONSOLIDATED FREIGhTYAYS $944.99 FREIGHT " D 099509 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES 52.590 .9 NECNANCIAL SUPPLIES � 099505 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2.269.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES Z 099506 CRANE VEYOR CORP. $442.83 BUILDING MATERIALS _CHARLES—P__CB➢WLELSO.• 556.76 _ _ PUMP PARTS — 099503 CAL WATER 9165.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 099509 CYBEREX i2.250.0C SERVICE AGREEMENT � 99 510 D.G. ENGINEERING 5950.03 TRUCK REPAIRS — M 099511 ORE. INC. $273.30 HARDIRM ` 3 099512 DANICLS TIRE SERVICE $5.580.01 TIMES A 99513_ TOM OANE9_— 5105.58 ____-MEETING EXPENSE 9t 099514 DECO $676.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 099515 OEZURIM ANO/OR CS CO. 52.812.94 VALVE PARTS ' I R99 DIA,IE.C_EDLYMFRS 1P.A05.90 _ _ ANIONIC POLYMER H.Q.8-10-88 191511 DICKSONS 598.55 ELECTRIC PARTS r 099510 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $3,903.22 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIR nONN.EDVARIIS.SLRE. .i1R.2R -_—_ PAINT sueeLies __.. 099520 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. $499.79 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT tZJ 099521 EPE TECHNOL06TES 51.879.13 REFUND USSR PER OVERPAYMENT 09952 V. M. E BERT CORP. $10 . . CONST2-27 RUCTION 099524 ECOSYSTEMS EN6.6 ANALYSIS i1.260.00 CONSULTING SERVICES u. .... .-. <i ae9-ia __.______ - ACTTOtl PLAN SLIOPfi _ _ � 099 n1c DWARD L. VISUAL.IMAGE°• - �099526 114 ED WRD L. ELLIOT. JF. 5752.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 14. N 099527 EMERY S PUROLATOR $35.00 FREIGHT nec ENEMANIEE.. At- a Inn.1n OCEANOOP_APNIC RESEARCH M.0.6.10-R7 099529 EVERECT EQUIPMENT $7,618.18 LOCKERS 099530 FACTORY REPRESENTATIVE. INC. 5686.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS --D9951L--.--JONN��FALNE NS TEIb._P C '3 SID-LO CO SMUCII07♦_SRRv�S_J_-7="-20_. C99532 FARR SALES R SERVICE $220.44 FILTER C99533 FAST TRACK. INC. $69.00 COMPUTER SOFMIARE n - 'i85`1A rE-0ERAL-ESRR SS CORP 'iR6.5° —AIM PRRLGNr _- i.. 999535 FERRELLGAS $9.75 PROPANE 099536 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1.387.50 HECNANICAL PARTS - .`--.-099513--..—_.._ . 114-SYSTEMS.__.----_—.. ee_.5n_yb PU@ PARTR _ _____ _ 099`_38 GELDER PUMPS. INC. $251.02 PUMP PARTS ` 099539 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $203.01 PAINT SUPPLIES p3g5A0 —LAIEiFLE8LLA5S_1NSI. re< ay iee_an .._ _CORTBACTSRRVTrrs 094541 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. $5,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-13 099542 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION $100.267.30 CONSTRUCTION J-13A D .. I a 1 W FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04/49 PAGE 3 - REPORT NUMBER AP43 .. CLAIMS PAID 05/10/89 POSTING DATE 05/10/69 _ V`"AAHT " --.YENOOP ---_ nrc�e r0.mu 099593 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.263.84 TELRPNONE 09954E SI - MECRANIf PARTS 099546 GILDLICK-MTTCBIOMA INC. f19$868.41 ROBAHICAL PARTS 0995A6 60LDEN COAST BIOMASS ENERGY CO f868.A. ROBUST TRONA0995i7 GREAT .ACIFIC ASSOC INC .... 116 40 ------- AUTOMOTIVE TMO TY673Nf 099549 GREAT PAC iF IC ASSOCIATES CO. ,293.51 ENGINEERING PARTS n 0995A9 DON 6RE EM { R IORRIULA IA TCS f6.293.51 ENCIN6ERLNG SERVICES IIES88-Ib1-2 In m 099551 —GALPRINLSUPPLY lirnu '8`-'• W[NIGHT _ Z 099551 NpLopIN SUPPLY CO. $40.83 FITTINGS 099552 HARBOUR ENGINEERING 99,241.33 PUMP PARTS — 199553----HEWLETG-K-TNK.-3NG. 3 2517.24 -- INSTRUMENT REPAIR —_ 099559 NEY LETT PAC KARD a517.2A INSTRUMENT REPAIR 099555 MllT 1. INC. $58.78 PUHP PARTS "6 IIOOGiON-ELL CTR7t L1.BOS.A4 ®......�68RVI68G fYl 099557 MOERGIBER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 31.899.08 MPACHANTCAL PARTS 3 099558 NOSE DOCTOR 3151.96 PUMP PARTS ��.9559 -MBUSE OF BATTERIES ......8-- --- BATIUTES - 099560 A.S. MUGMES CO.. INC. 5358.54 HARDWARE 099561 HUGHES MICROELECTRONIC $949.44 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT _- 09956P-- '. .vNTi MG4NI BEA6M i}}.g" " --- �AT8B-U6"dG5 099563 HUKTIN6TON SUPPLY 312T.2C BARDRARE f' 099564 IND DELAVAL INC. $1.608.56 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -L-09966fi —id60-99NPAN9— ` --------iNS'ERUM�9 ----- Cy 099566 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,191:09 FITTINGS 099567 INGRAM PAPER A256.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES ---++w----- — 'AViN`..-RINGi:- AYER DISTRICT IA 099569 RIVIERA FINANCE $678.82 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES .� 099578 KAMAN BEARINGS t SUPPLY 386.99 FITTINGS --�T-19957Y----. ._ NRNER-COMPANY___-- „-,tfi _ ..-._ _ .-_ -TDOLS N 399572 KEENAN SUPPLY $570.49 VALVE 099573 THE KEITH COMPANIES 39.418.04 ENGINEERING SERVICES MS 88-65-5 ---R99S9f--M}EVifi-PAOIFI —CONSTRUCTION ERVICEB-PI-2"I-3F— '- ---. 695575 KING BEARING. INC. $13.339.45 MACHINE SUPPLIES 099576 KIRST PUMP A MACHINE WORKS $1.855.00 PURR, PARTS —0999"---NARTIN-e ORDtCMr SP— .YPM2rR8---- --�ONeTRUCVEON�eRviCe9-5-Y9:5-31--- -- ---- ,. 099570 L.A. LIQUID MANGLING SYSTEMS 51.367.52 PIRG PARTS 099579 L.B.Y.S., INC. 521.69 WELDING SUPPLIES .,, 099500 "SEA-SUPPLiE9-i-SERVIBE ----35Hs1}-----PRSNT'-SUPPtte9 --- - ,, 099561 ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE $300.00 PUBLICATIONS 099582 LEARN - PC VIDEO SYSTEMS $703.50 COMPUTER VIDEO -------;-LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE-BUPFN ----SY5s00---- - --- CYLIMOERREPALRB---- -- - - - - —;- 0995b0 LIMITOPOUC CORP. $1,876.35 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 099585 K.F. LINDSTROM, INC. 313.359.A0 CONSULTING SERVICES-MASTER PLO '—�99566------NBC-IPPLIEO-ENVIRONM 16rOO ------ -OCEAR-MONITORING-- - --- 099587 NPS $52.37 PHOTO SERVICES 09958E MACOMCO f109.80 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT b i W ri -� FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/09/89 PAGE 9 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 05/ CLAIMS PAID OS/l0/0/B9 POSTING GATE OS/10/89 I� A :_—WARRAN.T 0. ._. —YEYDDR ANDUYT _--_DESCRIPTION 099589 MALCOLM FINNIE A INC. 3406.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES - MASTER PLAN 099590 MARSHALL MAINT. PRODUCTIONS 3283.0E SAPETT VIDEOS 099592 NARVAC ELECTRONICS $31.58 INSTRUKU T SUPPLIES " 099592 MASTER TOOLS SERVICES $512.84 TOOL REPAIR �• IvI 099593 MATT . CHLOR. IMC, $1,753,67 _____CHLORINATION PARTS •` 099594 MCNENNA CRAG. L EQUIP. $16,496.87 PUMP PARTS a 099595 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP 5572.27 TRUCK PARTS 099596 MEDLIN CONK _ ;T 099597 MILLIPORE AND/OR WATERS $1,166.00 LAB EQUIPMENT " 2 099598 NLAOEN BUNTICN CONSTPUCTION CO S355.585.99 CONSTRUCTION 3-34R 099599 NONITEK, INC_ 3329.S2 -__ nF rr REPAIRS '^ 099600 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO. 9300.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS C99601 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $2.865.02 LAB SERVICES lu OTfGM pDf,$]$Lfi3. Ib[. 3]31_61 RUBBER PROD11ET5 _ 3 099603 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES $73.83 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 099609 NATIONAL ELECTRIC TEST. ASS DC. 3131.00 PUBLICATION n99AO5— A.ELONAL.EJL7ER_%rnIA CGRE. -9,429.14 00 099606 NEAL SUPPLY GO. 6360.8R HARDWARE 099601 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $21.74 WATER USEAGE a99[n. _NQRIMur9T MOTOR UrI ntum. INL .919_6C —_----_ Imruaxrnl. nears 099609 O.M.S. $1.560.00 TRASX BINS r 099610 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $194.29 SAFETY CLASSES —999A3` OEEICE PAxn ,ON/SNTEDUR 9ra_ _A• nrnry nmxmmF ______ 17 099612 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDES .. 965.00 SUBCRIPTION 099613 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. $39.681.28 CHLORINE M.O. 10-12-88 —ALcn.n 9UPa�.Pa 099615 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $164.75 TRUCK PARTS '-• 099616 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $30.16 CHEMICALS _ORANGE_YALWC_LIITTOIR rA_ anrA_a9_-- FTWT r,,G " 099618 OXYGEN SERVICE S912.91 SPECIALTY GASSES N 099619 COUNTY OF ORANGE $3,982.9` ENGINEERING SERVICES _ 'ON" S _._ RRTxanaar lJQRYFRG rONP TNaORdW!F 099621 PACIFIC DATA CON SYSTEMS S415.88 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 099622 PACO PUMPS S1,407.65 PUP PARTS Q99623--WC1E3C-S.AELT-Y-EOUL"MZ CO- " ,.3A6.•a _._. —_-SAFnSSUY1IIle 099624 PACIFIC BELL $13.38 TELEPHONE 099625 PAK WEST S329.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ARXEL2RODUCZ1OlG- IS1f . __ avry aTnrna _ 099627 PARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY 1106.36 MECHANICAL PARTS 099628 PHOTO A SOUND CO. 3361.72 OFFICE EQUIPMENT' --0 996 2 9---._-R.ILXUICX_PAPER-... — •^.17--.-__. ,IAXIrnaT., en2p...a —___.__ " 099636 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES S191.75 PWSTIC BOTTLES 099631 POLYPURE. INC. SIS,969.67 CATIONIC POLYMEIIS N.0.3-8-89 -00532 _JONELELEf IJ ZUERLa • - IpS:on ........ $99633 POWER MACHINE CO. $318.04 MHCHANICAL PARTS 099634 POWERWF $52.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE w• FUND NO 9194 J7 DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04/89 PAGE 5 - REPORT NUMBER AP43 _ ._i CLAIMS PAID 05/10/89 POSTING DATE 05/10/89 �. �a ^0 -YEM Dne ___ nrvq.en nu is 099635 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $99.00 ICE - ,7 -�NSTRUM&VT�NSBRCT30N-Y1-20.J-45.g2-T3a3i- � 099637 RNI MARKETING $140.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 099638 PECYC. INC. 339.140.09 SLUDGE REMOVAL X.0.5-11-88 899679 OGS .... ". _--�pgggKSiN1R5 099640 REMEDY TEMP '$1.026.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES 199641 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 3438.F5 PIPE FITTINGS - n 6YNOL�PLWER TT4AX6M;S- S8t2`" - ..w"DARCiAI, REPAIRS �- ,�m 099643 J. R. :OBERT3 CORP. $444:228.39 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4,J-20 099644 ROB INSN FE RT IL"ER CO. 36852.46 CHEMICALS n •'"64R_ ROSAN:.:E-MAM INC. i87-I ^..%� REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT --__ ,•. p 99646 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL 33N54.9J INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES P; .1996 99647 POTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. $268.06 - ELECTRIC SUPPLIES I 099648 541"4 KLEEM-LORP !�e m 099649 SANCON ENGINEERING INC. $27.800.00 SURE REPAIRS 099650 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO. $356.61 - LAB SUPPLIES ;_.- --GRO.G., SCN4EFTR--0{KON-ASSOCIATES i39.8B6 21 --- z.,O:NEERING-SERVICES DI T-a-E-Id----- ?' CO 099652 THE SCHOOLEP CO. S3.753.00 APPRAISAL SERVICES _ 099653 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS. INC. 1220.00 LAB SUPPLIES 899669 SE#-TOAST £81GN6 11 189eo.21 - PPIOB-REPAIRS -- �� n 099655 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $456.53 TOOLS 099656 SIGMA CIRCUTS $1,733.69 REFUND USER FEE OVEPAYMENNT - F d9^657 -ar:Fe. M KERS-yESI 63i Be -- SDIDB-SERNIOES - - 21 0996598 SNITH.EHERY CO. $637.50 SOIL TESTING 095659 SNI rH FIPE A SUPPLY. INC $104.99 PLUNGING SUPPLIES B99660 SOIL AND TEST-INS ENGINEERS H-r1 B1.iv- SOIL TESTING --- ;: --1 099661 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY S500.09 PERMIT FEES 099662 SOUTH COAST DODGE $37.14 TRUCK PARTS v n�'99663-------SOUTHER N-SALE F.-EDIT DN-EO d1---------POWER ---- a: -1 G99664 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $23.263.88 DIESEL PUEL 099665 SPEAR PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION 311.932.68 CONSTRUCTION DIST 16 - PEE-TECH-YES TERN i'r---------YBLDINO-9HPPtIE9 -- - 099667 SPEECO 31.856.38 SCALE MAINTENANCE jot! 099668 ROBERT SPIES $600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ANNUAL REPORT -._-0996b9.----RTOR-TOOL-B-SUPPtT C E8- .___ S _-___-__ .__ ___ 09967A SCOTT STEVENS $39.75 MEETING MUSE 'n. 099671 SUPELCO, INC. S1.345.80 LAB SUPPLIES w: SUPP C*S 4.I 099E TS SUR-LITE CORPORATION $6.384.93 BURNER REPLACEMENTS 099674 7AQGINa WAGGON MOPILHONE PARK 3945.4E REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT nv a ._.-.-b99695-.--.__.._.TAN-TAN AX IMF.-- -- -_ ---39T765:fi9--_- -_- EOMTRACYLNRSCAPING-._.__- .___ ..____.. 099676 TAYLOR-DUNN $107.06 TRUCK PARTS 0- 099677 TELEPRODUCTS CORP. 1489.00 INSTRUMENT �99693----i-PEAR-F1ilF INSUR6NCE 75B.d6— ---CRANT-DEEUS- ----- --- G 99679 TRAVEL TRAVEL S46 T.d0 TRAYEL SERVICES 099606 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY. INC. 3582.17 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 1 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/O4189 PACE 6 D REPORT NUMBER AP43 M COUNTY SANITA ION DIS IC S OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/10/69 POSTING DATE 05/10/89 DESCRIPTIONWARRANT NO, vrmnoR AMOUNT ' 099681 TWINING LABORATORIES S11r852.25 PIPE INSPECTION i• A CRIMMINS, INC f9.261.49 ENGINEERING 9¢RVLCBB P2-60 099663 UNOCAL $125.66 GASOLINE I• 099689 THE UN180 URGE CORP. 3154.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES • 099685 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE PARCEL SERVICES ��1 099686 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE $1,268.03 REFUND USSR Pe¢ OVERPAYMENT 099687 URBAN ALTERNATIVES 38.166.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - COIOIUNITY OUTREACH PP.00 �1a 099AAN VYR SCIENTIFIC $2,323.55 LAB SUPPLIES 099689 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3,216.06 RARONAR¢ D 099690 VAREC DIVISION $9,158.58 MICHALIICAL PARTS Gl 099691 VAR 11tl itl3TBYNENFJGROUP __._ ... 099692 VEHICLE SPRING SEPYICE $593.90 TRUCK REPAIRS Z 099693 VEPTE} SYSTEMS 543975.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0999 VILLAS (NSERES SUPPLY _ 99695 VILLAGE NURSERIES 403.00 GROUND COVER -n 029696 VORTEX INDUSTRIES fS 1900.00 BUILDING SSPAIR9 !gin Fn n_ R91 .InNR R—MAPWARREN rc 5444.49 npUS MNSURL CE "MIN. 099699 CART WARREN i CO. 3300.J4 LIAR. INSURANCE OVERPAYMENT G99699 WASTE WATER OISP05Al f30L306.19 R¢PDNO U380. PEE OV¢RPAYMBNT " CK 099702 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY f12$440.54 GESTIC SODA N.0.8-10-88 '! I 099701 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. 3990.5E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 099 WOODYAulLSGftY3_ELYDE FMlCONSULTANTS *ur y$1 5LSAS78.30 _ ENG.INEERING SERVICES 1-12 099705 XEROXYARD CLTDE CONSULTANTS TB $5,849.74 COPIER LEASES SERVICES - PILE DBIVIHC 099745 %EE CORP. f518A9.T9 COPIER LFASGS �'DH3TRIIrTTI1M P9AI .m O . ul aP CA t- --.- .—.TPTJ4lLAlxs sAm nS43189_ v7.7a l,as9_Pc „' I� � 99RR SEERESS=SEVER xl ati m :a nl i m D FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST NURSING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/04/89 PAGE 7 V REPORT NBMRER AP43 CODN' OUSITY Cl SANITAD 0 DISTRI/10/89CSP OF POSTING UP G'5/10/ CLAIMS PAID OS/10/B9 POSTING DATB 5/10/89 SUMMIT 1MOONI /2 OPER PDND S 35.18 i2 ACO PUNp 3.997.51 'O /2 P FOND 253,266.95 /3 OPEe R FUND 116.149.38 _ _aL /3 AM FUND 258,070.05 G 3 F/l PUND 575.00 '.a /5 OPEN FUND 2.485.95 -c-f /5 P/R FUND 23,111.43 "y /6 AGO FUND 8.394.93 f6 F/H FUND 2.500.50 i] OPER PUND 7,241_49 1 j /] ACO POND 31,189.87 "-3 n P/R POND 61.863.60 /Il OPBR FUND 1,918.21 00 /14 OPEN FUND -_____—._._.- __._.___ 00 /I4 ACD NND 11.40 /566 ACO FUND 69.160.1I _ ' /1614 OPER FIRM B51 689.14 _ �n 470.45 r JT OPEN PINK, 752.470.45 gou 4,A16.7U3. SELF 09 - SELF FUNDED UR WORNURSING CAS COMP INSURANCE FUND 8.550.72 JT GIST 4XIRRING CAPITAL POND I86.147.41 "y 8 7.257.049.26In - -1 a - 110 ...1 % FUND NO 9299 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/P9 RAGE I _ REPORT NUMBER AP43 G CLAIMS PAID U5124189 POSTING DATE 05/24/89 al .I 0997SR ARM BUSINESS MACHINES $21.2G SERVICE AGREEMENT A 099761 ADAMSON UNIFORM S EQUIP. 31,568.15 LAB SUPPLIES 099762 AIM PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL INC. $4,748.90 START-UP FEES "! MI 099764 AMERICAN CHAIN A BEAR CO. S872.36 - PUMP PARTS iA D 099769 AMERI I CH 3261.60 COPIER LEASES 1°I �311781[—XEMIX DM 2— M u RI 09976T THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 42,417.13 O'RINGS 6 GASKDTS 2 099768 BLACE PA ANDERSON $1,410.55 MEETING EXPENSE f nip 09977E ARAiEN SERVICES. MAC. i5A 791.8E UNIFORM RENTALS I 099711 NICHOLAS ARMONTES $316.75 TRAINING 6 MEETING MMSB ho 099773 ASSOCIATED BAG CO. 966.15 OPERATING SUPPLIES bi 099774 B S K FRECISION $85.06 INSTRUMENT REPAIR um U'pPFA 099776 BANK OF A r ICA NTSSA f$11.66 BANG CARDS 4� 1 199777 G.R. BARGY71 AND ASSOC. S5,610.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P2-33.34,32,37 n 095779 B. BATEMAN $575.00 DEFERRED CORP ➢ISTRIBOTIOM ias f— 099780 BATTERIES NEST. INC. 34111.89 TRUCK PARTS LAN 5UFFLLES ty 0997k2 RC F:7 ENGINEERING. INC. $67.42 COMPRESSOR PARTS Mo;•�-� 099703 BLACK BON CORP SS02.15 COMPUTER NARBWME a �7 095T85 BONNEVILLE EQUIP.. INC. 54.790.06 CRANE SAFETY CERTIFICATES D99786 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $137,699.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES 16-1 IPW1 . 0991tlP BUPRC ENGINEERING CO. 5152.71 ELECTRIC SNPPLI86 6.ICn 099189 PUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 51,827.UD LAND SURVEYING M.0.6-8-88 099791 C G R RECONDITIONING CO. 3390.00 MBCBARICAL PARTS AA 099792 CS COMPANY $15.54 OXYGEN SUPPLIES � '099796 CALIROL . INC. $809.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES A C99795 JOHN CAROLLP. CN61NEERS $196,494.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34,PI-20,J-I3 Mo ni 099797 CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. $2.551.68 OIL 6 CREASE AN D99198 CLARK CONSULTANTS $2.640.00 CONSULTING SERVICES AM 0f9bRV CUMGRCSSOR CGPFONLNTS OF CALIF 52,125.0E CARDS 6 CHAIN 095tl01 CONSOLIDATES LLECTPICAL DI 51. S6.552.1G ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 099B05 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $285.51 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 099804 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 51,086.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES s>IW - vl A r, ^j LG FUND NO 919P - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/09 PAGE P ` REPORT NUMRFR AP43 CLAIMS PAID 95/24/89 POSTING DATE 05124/B9 099805 CAL WATER $312.32 RENTAL EQUIPMENT A� 099007 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $2,965.76 TI88S 099888 DEZURIK AND/DR CS Co. S3.953.23 VALVE PARTS 1.' 099810 DORP-OLIVER. INC. $049.79 MECHANICAL PARTS E. 299811 O4C SEER IRO US TRIES. INC. f2.9T2.24 MECHANICAL PARTS n Z 09961J •EASTMAN. INC. $9,935.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES ..I D99814 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT S46.00 TBUCE PUTS D In 0996169E17 LTEQCRT COPP 62.70V.0G PIIEVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 09 ENGINEERING NEWS PECOPL $70.60 PUBLICATION M.I fT 0l5619 JEFF ESSER $130.08 MILEAGE MUSE � 1 3 099820 NARSHALL i11PRE5 q40.00 DEFERRED CXW DISTRIBUTION w—LL�99581T DORM . . PALEE RSI[TIPYS. T.f.....a WNSIROCIIUN SEROICOR ]-1 FLJ 20 i 00 099622 FEDERAL EXPRESS CDRP. $336.00 AIR FREIGHT m' 1 099823 FEPRELLGAS $29.25 PROPANE •3a 099IT5 FISCHER A PORTER CO. $9,062.98 CNEORINAIION PARTS s P"' 099826 FOUNTAIN VALLCY CAMERA $302.04 FILM P.: C7 09902b FOUNTAIN VALLEY Cv PAIk1 f724.20 PAINT SUPPLIES pepe i--i 699A29 THE FOVBORO CO. S41348.57 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES la. W99831 FRUEHAUF DIVISION S12.405.87 TRUCK SWAIM •i' p. 099R32 CITY OF FULLERTON $98.21 WATER USEAOE 6: H—I 09963 GIF.P LICH-KIT NCLL. INC. SI1 . PUMP PARTE b•I 09963 5 J.X. GL AEC. I $5 0C. , 110 14.50 '[RAINING VIDEO 099831 VUST GRAPHIC CONTROLS 4331.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 0998SP TONY GUTIERREZ $110.02 TRAINING MUSE N 09940 FPLU A. HARPER f1.456.66 ME COMP DISTRIBUTION I 099813 HATCH G MIRK, INC. $5.5)].a} MECHANICAL AL PARTS 0 099843 HOLRBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. S507.95 COMPRESSOR PARTS 099844 DONALD D. HONOMICHL S300.V0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION Al .11 099846 R.S. HUGHLS CO.. INC. $857.2G HARDWARE LP 19SO47 CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH f14.31 WATER USEAGE w' 099b49 HYDROTEX $79461.13 TEST EQUIPMENT 09965C ENTERPRISE ENGINE DIV. $46.71 FREIGHT tD 0 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/69 PAGE 3 ` REPORT NUMBER AP93 CLAIMS PAID 05/24/09 POSTING DATE 05/24/89 41 099B51 ISCO COMPANY SA•Jb6.00 W SUPPLIES 099E53 J A V SCIENTIFIC $479.66 LAB SUPPLIES x 099b54 RIVIERA FINANCE f301.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES MW SUM 099656 JONES 1 STOKES ASSOC...INC. 39.729.A0 CONSULTING SERVICES US 89-27 rah 099657 FAMA" BEARINGS f SUPPLY 3990.61 FITTINGS yam 099859 KEENAN SUPPLY $1.134.03 VALVE PARTS •� 099660 KING BEARING, INC. $2.000.16 NACRINE SUPPLIES y C99662 MARTIN KOROICK. SF $2.583.9E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-29.5-30 = uI C95863 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 5185.54 CHEMICALS n°Fri uv'bbqr Pol3 099865 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY 3010.91 CYLINDER 6EPAIR3 C9 bb 9866 LIMITOROUE CORP. $1.082.84 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS y V4>TS7 X.J. LYNCF. C 5:6T 1Al1FTDF.I7S�01F LIES Iv. 6ab1 099868 MRC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL f585.6t OCEAN MONITORING - LAB SERVICES �.d l 699869 IDS $6.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS M> 099871 NS DATA SERVICE CORP. f127.20 DATA TRANSFERS 099872 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. $661.76 FILTER PRODUCTS VMW eF7 095074' MATT - C6LOF, IN[. 5373.1: CHLORINATION PARTS 099875 MCMASTFR-CARR SUFrLY CO, $80.41 SHARP SUPPLIES 6 095P77 MEDLIN CONPOLS CO. $102.83 GAUGE 6a 099878 MICROAGE COMPUTER $25.642.52 SOFTWARE/COMPUTERS 'W'.4 0956P v` MIDLAND MFG. CORP. • 1646.12 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES ®N C99061 MIDLAND LIPOFE ANO/OP VAT ERS f]29.16 LAB SUPPLIES x spa •C-9085 JAKES M. MOKTGOMERY S/2.628.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES - FOUL AIR SCRUBBERS •A ;a. 099bB9 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. 32.308.79 HARDWARE BOOK XErLAVEMENI 6,; C996HE NATIONAL FEKCE RENTALS 3566.OS FENCING 095697 NATIONAL LUMBER 9530.16 MAKUWARE r •099889 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $842.59 PIPE 6 FITTINGS x 099698 NEWARK ELECTRONICS S48.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS .o t99 91 tlttiCiA[ 1 CIMi G lOES SI76 OC SUBSCRIFIFUN ri9E 92 OLYPFIC CPr KTCAL CO. $13.677.46 CHLORINE M.O. LO-12-88 r.99893 POGEPT J. MEN $293.96 TWINING EXPENSE . 099895 ORANGC COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 3140.22 AUTONOTIVE PARTS 6, FITTINGS C99696 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING [0. 3289.0 I r S FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 5/17/09 PAGE 0 REPORT NUMBED AP41 CLAIMS PAID 05/24/89 POSTING DATE 05/24/89 sI ;I 099897OSCPR•S LOOP A SAFE 5130.02 LOOK 6 KEYS re 099899 COUNTY OF ORANGE i;6.100.00 DISPOSAL CATS PIES 699900 COUNTY OF ORANGE t10.000.00 CLAIM 57-66-78 m 0999" PACIF EC FARTS 11.96T.OY PUMP PARTS nl� G99903 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 11.519.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES ' fTl 099905 PANEL CELLUL AP 373.50 CELLULAR TEtEP80NE SERVICES 11.1 O 099906 FARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $434.37 NECBANICAL PARTS I'^' PO PYMBCPOr OFi 044p 00 0110(RYD-LO!@ OIlIRIIOTI[p p 09990b SAM W. PCTEASON S ASSOC. ST.170.93 ENGINlIRING SERVICES 2-11-3 lu- i�qq 099909 PHOTO 9 SOUND CO. $381.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0:9 099911 PITNEY HOWES $126.00 SCALE REPAIR I 099912 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $163.30 HARDWARE y 09941 3 Pot+ I9 eR1C. 22,061. 3 GuIE.I.. ....TRES la 099910 FOLYFUPE. INC. $33,530.65 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-8-89 _.�. 1 09ggl5 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $312.58 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES pp 099917 TH"Ell PROJECTS SOLU 110N Co. 39.0 00.0us IdSTR@IRNTATIDN INSPECTION M.0.8-10-68 6+I rr 099910 PULSAFEEDEP 5081:G5 PUMP PARTS 19917 �URF7lTELR7A"T A"I" 9 FIRM P" m.J 09992P QUALITY pUILDINI SUPPLY .90 AOILDIN 170G MATERIALS P94921 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $744.56 TRASN DISPOSAL 099923 RED WING SHOES .180.03 SAFETY GROSS J99424 REMEDY TEMP $1.136.4♦ THMORARY SERVICES Oo99P e926 TMF LIC SUPPLY CO. 51.210— PIPE 6 FITTINGS 095927 PICUH CORPCOR 3660.G.^ COPIER LEASES 771 099929 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. S211.305.50 CONSTRUCTION -7-4 .9 �• 09g930 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $331.66 ELECTRIC MOTOR n� �9^931 .. P99532 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS. INC. i5.565.00 OFFICE MACHINE P99933 SEA COAST OESIGAS A45.66 OFFICE REPAIRS lu. •al 095939 $MI 1M A... 0 SOPPt7. T0C Y021T7Y--�IEOMBffiG .AFF EfI. w 194935 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS S4I6.00 SOIL TESTING 099936 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY S7.667.00 PERMIT PEPS I'S )37 SO COESI PIP 00 LIT. $5.000.00 PRTIPLI S33Ui P 95938 SOUTHEPA CALIF. EDISON CO. $364.673.59 POWER m W 099539 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $5.161.86 NATURAL GAS 099941 BP AP NLE?TS DPIMNIMG WATER 51.550:23 GRINNING WATER/COOLRR RENTAL 'wl - 099942 SPEC TECN WESTERN $332.84 WELDING SUPPLIES I°3.'JO i J �• W J LIT FUND NO 919- - JT FIST WORKING Cepi lAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/89 PAGE 5 ` REPORT NUXBEP 4P43 CLAIMS FAID 05/24/89 POSTING DATE 05/24/89 ai 099943 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYS TCMS. INC. $65.72 TOEING y 099945 STAROW STEEL 9232.91 METAL 099946 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. $498.69 TOOLS al 09994N SUMMIT STEEL • 12,871.77 MAL 099949 SUNSET FORD $15.01 TRUCK PARTS u ITI 0999" THE SUPPLIERS $1,457.66 TOOLS/HARDWARE .> Z 099952 SURVIVAIR $325.61 ANRIAL INSPECTION '•�]7 099954 TAYLOR-DUNN SL73.24 ELECTRIC CART PARTS P9.155 TECH-CCSSORIES $52.9p OFFICE SUPPLIES ,a fTl C99957 THERMO ANALYTICAL. INC./NOPCAL >A 2.00 LAB SERVICES p� 3 099956 TILLINGHAST 51.100.30 CONSULTING SERVLC85 W 4a; 00 09946f. TRUCK L AUTO SUFFLV, INC. 3949.94 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS �.J 099561 J.G. TUCKER. A SON. INC. 56.875.16 ANALYZER PARTS D 099963 UNITED PARCEL•SERVICE $482.74 PARCEL SBHVICES a 1— 099964 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR $319.75 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT tv 099966 V4h SC]ENTI;IC 36.T22.79 LAE SUPPLIES 699967 VALLFY CITIES SUFFLV CO. $4.851.00 HARDWARE/PIITINGS jn 099969 VISTA FAINT CORP. 9020.19 PAINT SUPPLIES YELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE 52.716.59 SEMI" SERVICES Ate, --I099972 YILLPAN ASSCCIATES $21.242.34 ENGIIA.ING SERVICES 2-26-2.2-27 C999T3 ROURKE 6 WOCDP16F $32.613.5f• LEGAL SERVICES M.O. 10-14-87 �- 099975 GEORGE YANDLEY ASSOCIATES $293 AO VALVE „I 099976 ARTHUR YOUNG 55.993.00 PROPESSIONAL SERVICES----------------- ' L ya; TLitL CLAIMS PAID C5/24/85 31.719.936.5P I� a.l � 1 PUWO RD 9199 — 3Y DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/17/89 PAGE 6 C73 REPORT NMER AP43 COUMIY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAtHE PAID OS 24 POSTLNC GATE 0 4 89 1% Y AMOUNT le it OPER FOND i 4316.56 11° . 02 F/R FORM2. .13 " ^I 03 OPER POD12.701]01.6666 I„ ' B5 OPEN FUND 6,068.55 BS F/R POND 156.00 �6 o9eR mien _ M.01 _ I� 06 ACO FUND 8,145.69 k r 06 F/R FUND 23,168.32 _ D9FR plron _,$.4 E2.R2 'F1l B7 AM FUND 21,688.91 B1 F/R FOND 287.24 _ 9 H n9RR 91ND A�3R4.08 Q0 014 OPER POND 8.71 �a1 'B14 AOF PUNO 52,895.71 %'1 HR66 AIDR Phan — 2,680.70 �" 666 A/1R 6 IGIDFYVF AN 2,fi 35.70 42 8667 OPEB POND 35.42 ° 17 Pla 2.781. lT OPER FUND 6.257.06 525.145.87 — la• �JT WORI[INGOCAPITAL POND 158,233.32 is 1% M' M, n; 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORN" 10644 eU5 AN NUE va.BOX 0127 v FOUWWNVN Y.0 UFOWX 92725d+27 n+41962z4n May 24, 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager FM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager RE: PURCHASE OF TWENTY-SIX ( 26) FOUR WHEEL ELECTRIC CARGO CARRIERS, SPECIFICATION NO. A-145 Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday, April 4, 1989 for the purchase of twenty-six ( 26) four wheel electric cargo carriers. Tabulation of bids is as follows: BID PRICES DEALER UNIT TOTAL 1. W. T. Hillard, Inc. $4,470.00 $116,220.00 Santa Fe Springs, CA 2. Taylor-Dunn Mfg. 5,161.90 134,209.40 Anaheim, CA 3. Karrior Mfg. Co. 5,549.00 152,930.44 Gardena, CA It is recommended the award for Purchase of Twenty-Six ( 26) Four Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers be made to W.T. Hillard, Inc. , lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $116,220.00, plus sales tax. Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" Purchase of Twenty-Six Four Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-145 Page 2 We herebyconcur with the foregoing recommendation: /�+�+"� ary G. treed, lh of A inistrative Assistant and Acting Director of Finance ✓/� . . W �6`U.vi"'� William N. Clarke, General Superintendent TN:sw "C-2" AGENDA ITEM k9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORM" 19BAAEUUS AVENUE I� PO BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9212E-6121 41141 SV4411 May 22, 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: Wayne Sylvester, General Manager via: Gary Streed, Chief Administrative Assistant and Acting Director of Finance FM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager RE: PURCHASE OF ONE, 2 1/2 TON CRANE-MOUNTED, FLAT BED TRUCK, SPECIFICATION NO. A-147 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, May 16, 1989, for the purchase of One, 2 1/2 Ton, Crane-Mounted, Flat Bed Truck. Tabulation of bids is as follows: Dealer Bid Price 1. Ole Lee, Inc. $39,842 El Monte 2. Allen GMC 40,000 Laguna Niguel 3. Morgan Crane 41,945 Santa Ana 4. GMC Truck Division 43 ,432 Santa Fe Springs "D-1" AGENDA ITEM N9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" a Page 2 Specification No. A-147 It is recommended the award for purchase of One, 2 1/2 Ton, Crane-Mounted, Flat Bed Truck be made to Ole Lee, Inc. of El Monte, CA, lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $39,842.00, plus sales tax. Sufficient funds have been budgeted for this purchase. Ted Hof Purchasing Manager We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendation. ry G. treed, C ief Aftinistrative Assistant and Acct]i�ngg Director of Finance W // / /u_ William D . Clarke, General Superintendent TH:sw "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS ^D-2" a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Ei (8) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE uneht JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Ded*") S 29,180.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 FLAGPOLE ILLUMINATION ADDITION The Contractor was directed to add two direct burial sealed light fixtures with associated conduit and wiring far illumination of two flagpoles adjacent to the east side of the New South Wing. The illumination of the flagpoles was suggested by the project architect in order to have the flags flying continuously on a 24-hour basis resulting in a daily labor savings to the Districts of raising and lowering the flags. The flagpole lighting was not shown on the contract drawings or included in the contract specifications. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference PCH #26) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 2,800.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 ADDITIONAL PIPE SUPPORTS The Contractor was directed to install additional pipe supports to span four roof truss joists in order to provide more support for the 6-inch chilled water piping running in the ceiling of Room No. 120. This change was required by the project architect and structural engineer to provide additional support for the HVAC piping. The pipe supports were not shown on the contract drawings. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO #30) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 331.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Ei ht (8) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE une 989 JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4 Item 3 HOT WATER HEATER CIRCUIT ADDITION The Contractor was directed to install a 480 volt hat water heater circuit for the new water heater in Kitchen No. 111. Due to the limited capacity of the electrical panels in Room No. 104, it was necessary to run the circuit across the building to Room No. 130. This change was requested by the Districts in order to provide power for the hot water heater. Also included in this change are the addition of two map light receptacles in the Board Room. The circuits were not shown on the contract drawings or included in the contract specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #35) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,979.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 PLASTER SCREED ADDITIONS The Contractor was directed to use aluminum vertical plaster expansion joint screeds for all the vertical plaster joints in both the existing Administration Building and new South Wing. The contract specifications called for a plastic vertical screed which is no longer manufactured and the project architect requested the use of aluminum vertical screed material to match the contract specified aluminum horizontal screed. Also included in this change is the installation of additional aluminum drip molding in the soffits and J-molding around all the doors and windows. This molding was not shown on the contract plans or included in the contract specifications. The additional molding was necessary to provide a finished plaster edge around the doors and windows and was requested by the project architect. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #43) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 11,110.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 6' P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO.Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO: J-7-4 Item 5 CEILING JOIST REWORK The Contractor was directed to reframe the ceiling in Room No. 108 in order to provide clearance for heating and ventilating ductwork. The framing modification was requested by the Districts as the mechanical subcontractor was not able to install the required ductwork with the ceiling framed as shown on the contract drawings. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #33) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 813.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 KITCHEN ELECTRICAL ADDITIONS The Contractor was directed to add additional convenience outlets, circuit breakers, conduit and wiring for the new appliances to be installed in Kitchen Nos. 111 and 146. This change was requested by the Districts to supply power for the additional kitchen appliances selected by the Districts and specified by the project architect. The additional circuitry was not shown on the contract plans or included in the contract specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH #28) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,287.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 SHEARWALL PENETRATION REINFORCEMENT The Contractor was directed to reinforce shear panel walls in Room Nos. 103 and 107 where they are penetrated by heating and ventilating ductwork. This change was required by the project structural engineer to insure the integrity of the shear walls to provide restraint for building lateral loads. Reinforcement details were not shown on the contract drawings. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #32) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 862.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �i FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. E1 ht (8) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE une 9 JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4 Item 8 KITCHEN RANGE HOOD VENT DUCTS The Contractor was directed to install ventilation ducting from the kitchen range hoods up through the roof of the new South Wing. The ducting was requested by the project architect to provide ventilation for cooking equipment in Kitchen Nos. 111 and 146. The ventilation ducting was not shown on the contract drawings or included in the contract specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #44) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,214.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 9 FURRING STRIP ADDITION The Contractor was directed to add furring strips on interior and exterior walls in a number of locations on the New South Wing. The furring strips were requested by the project architect in order to provide a continuous surface for installation of stucco or drywall where plywood shear panels are discontinuous in a straight wall line. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #36) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 630.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days Item 10 BATHROOM SOFFIT ADDITION The Contractor was directed to add three soffits over the lavatory countertops in Bathroom Nos. 113, 116 and 118. This change was requested by the Districts and the project architect and includes the soffit framing, drywall, painting and installation of nine additional light fixtures with associated conduit and wiring. The bathroom soffits were not shown on the contract drawings and were not included in the contract specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(8) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH #29 and #29A) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,577.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days "E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS .,E-4^ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. E 19 ht (8) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE une 14, 1989 JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4 Item 11 CHILLER PIPING VALVE ADDITION The Contractor was directed to furnish and install two 4-inch gate valves on the chilled water supply and return lines and two 2-inch gate valves on the hot water supply and return lines where the lines enter the existing Administration Building. The valves were requested by the project mechanical engineer in order to connect chiller piping to the existing Administration Building without shutting down and draining the system which will be in operation serving the new South Wing. These valves were not shown on the contract drawings or included in the contract specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO d37) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,577.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 29,180.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 12 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Changes Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 12 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Items 1 - 11 above constitute full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "E-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92798 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION JOB NO. J-7-4 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date July 11, 1988 Original Contract Time 602 Calendar Days Original Completion Date March 4, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 12 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 31 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 633 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date April 4, 1990 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 3 549 000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0 This Change (Add) WeAuet) $ Amended Contract Price $ 3,737,'959.00 Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: 4k'p- gz /.'? on ruction manager CiiEe J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION i ACCEPTED/BY: APPROV 3Y: Contractor Date i or o ngineen ng Date "E-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-6" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �J FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER - C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16) CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC. DATE June JOB: L AT PLA N N - Amount of this Change Order (Add) (8eduet:) $ 36,700.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - ACCOMMODATIONS FOR HANDICAPPED PERSONS The contract drawings and specifications did not provide toilets and showers in the men's and women's restrooms to meet Title 24, State of California Building Standards, for handicapped persons. The Contractor was instructed to modify showers that included framework .and tile in lieu of standard molded plastic stalls along with seats, grab bars and special lighting. Alterations were also required to the toilets and their fixtures. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 40, 40A and 408). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,815.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - INSTALL PLATFORM CLOSURE A 6-inch opening between the north-south walkway on the top of the pipe pit and the east side of the pump station at the east man-door was considered a possible safety hazard. A special section of walkway was fabricated and placed in the opening. This work was accomplished by Contractor' s force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)28 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 534.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 3 - UTILITY ROOM PIPING The contract drawings created an interference problem in the utility room. The water piping as designed would block the access door to the room and a sanitary sewer drain blocked access for placement of the heat pump. The Contractor was instructed to move the piping and provide a new location for the janitor's sink and the access door. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 078). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 968.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE Via.✓ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16) CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC. DATE June 14 989 JOB: AT PLA NT Item 4 - MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS TO WALKWAYS AND LADDERS The contract drawings provided various interferences with ladders, walkways and electrical fixtures. The Contractor was directed to perform the following work. a. Relocate a light fixture at the north end of the pipe pit that interfered with bulkhead storage rack. b. Modify walkway support by removing a section of the stainless steel angle that interfered with bulkheads stored in rack at north end of pipe pit. c. Modify six pipe pit ladders and handrail connections by adding 3x3 aluminum angles on side rail in order for ladders to conform to OSHA standards. d. Relocate electrical switches at the top of each pipe pit ladder due to ladder modifications. e. Modify bridge crane access ladder and cage that interfered with corbel support of bridge crane runway at southeast corner of building. f. Add an additional neoprene rubber seal on bottom of Bulkhead No. 1 due to insufficient sealing as designed. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2B of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 080) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,364.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - HANDRAIL AT TERMINATION CHANNEL When the Rothrock Pump Station Building was demolished, the south side of the termination channel was left open creating a hazardous condition to personnel . The Contractor was instructed to install 25 feet of aluminum handrail . This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 087) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,014.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE 1 / FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16) CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC. un DATE Je 989 JOB: N L N AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB Item 6 - MODIFY ROOF SLOPE The contract drawings did not provide for proper drainage of the northwest corner of the roof due to the personnel access hatch causing a damming condition. The Contractor was instructed to build up the roof two inches to channel water to the roof drains. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 096) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,081.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - INSTALL GROUNDING FOR COMPUTER AND REPLACE CURRENT BREAKERS FOR SUMP PUMPS The contract drawings and specifications did not provide for a separate grounding system for the booster plants DACS (Data Accumulated Control System) computer control system which is required to protect the equipment. Also, the wiring and breakers were designed undersize for the 7} H.P. sump pump motors. The Contractor was instructed to install the grounding system and replace the wiring and breakers to meet the electical requirements. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 097A) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,398.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days Item 8 - CLEAR UNKNOWN UNDERGROUND OBSTRUCTIONS During the pile driving operations for the 120-inch outfall pipe supports ES-1 and AB-1 at the Rothrock Pump Station, underground obstructions of abandoned pipe and concrete footings were encountered that were not shown on the plans. This caused the Contractor delay and additional costs in repositioning piling for driving or excavating and removing the obstructions. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2B of the General Provisions. (Reference Claim ES-1 and AB-I) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,093.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS 7-3- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16) CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC. DATE une 4, 989 JOB: AT PLA Item 9 - INSTALL AIR DRYER The contract drawings and specifications did not provide for an air dryer in the pneumatically operated variable air volume dampers in the Booster Station. The addition of the air dryers provides for a more efficient operation and reduced maintenance. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2B of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 084) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,663.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 10 - INSTALL ACOUSTICAL PANELING The contract drawings did not provide for acoustical paneling at the future doorway to the future Cogeneration Building located in the west wall of the basement in the booster station. Because the new building is not scheduled for completion for at least two years, it was determined that the door area should be covered with acoustical paneling as is the entire west wall. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 089) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 449.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 11 - REVISE GRATING FASTENERS The Contractor was instructed to provide a fastener called "rivnuts" that would replace ordinary bolts and nuts and therefore facilitate grating removal for servicing the motor components. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 098) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 321.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 36,700.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 7 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Changes Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 7 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Items 1 through 11 above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or con- sequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "F-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS 7-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �f FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16) CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC. DATEJune 989 JOB: E N OU L OST R TATION ' " AT PLA N 0 Nu. - 5 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date July 20, 1987 Original Contract Time 940 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 13, 1990 Time Extension This C.O. 7 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 74 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 1014 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date April 28, 1990 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $18,476 243.00 Prev. Auth. Changes T--98,502.79 This Change (Add) (Deduct) 700-06 Amended Contract Price 9,0 5. 9 Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: 'p- C-6- P Construction Manager Date ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: APPROV BY: R�sb UbM DeLl Co tr for to it ctor of Engineering Date "F-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 �i P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 989 JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS, JOB N . J-20 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduet) $ 30,857.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - WATER FACILITIES INSPECTION TRENCH MODIFICATION The Contractor was directed to do additional work on the Districts' water facilities inspection trench along the north side of the New North Road from the Districts' west property line to the new main entrance to Plant No. 1. This work included increasing the depth of the inspection trench from three feet to five feet, adding an additional 600 linear feet of trench and potholing and locating four known water lines crossing the New North Road in order to provide inspection by City of Fountain Valley water personnel. These changes were requested by the City of Fountain Valley in order to provide better verification of existing city water system pipelines crossing the New North Road into the Plant 1 treatment facility complex. This additional work was not shown on the contract drawings nor included in the contract specifications. This item of work was accomplished on a time and material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #2). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 10,529.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 14 Calendar Days Item 2 - REMOVAL OF UNSUITABLE SOIL UNDER BUILDINGS 5 AND 6 The Contractor was directed to remove and dispose of an additional two feet of unsuitable oversaturated clay sail material from under the building pads of Buildings 5 and 6. The removal was directed by the Districts' Soils Consultant in order to provide a stable pad for construction of the buildings. This item also includes an additional foot of overexcavation at the east end of Building 6 In order to remove unsuitable sail. The contract plans or specifications did not include this additional work. This item of work was accomplished on a time and material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-#5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 20,328.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 5 Calendar Days �.../ TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 30,857.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 19 Calendar Days "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3' P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20 The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Changes Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 19 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Items 1 and 2 above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 27, 1989 Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 25, 1989 Time Extension this C.O. 19 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 19 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 259 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date November 13, 1989 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 3,266,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes S U This Change (Add) (9edu6t) S— JU'Sb/.UU Amended Contract Price S ,296! 8 "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts DATE June JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING B Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMM iDED BY: o_ c--89 ons ruc ion Manager ate J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION ACCEPT , BY, o ,% A R D BY: on ractor ate irec or of Engl"neering ate "G-3.. AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 I P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �J FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Ei hteen (18) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 4, 1989 JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. P1-20; AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS N PAVLNUFLANI NU. i, JOB NO. PI-31 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 82,028.20 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. P1-20 Item 1 CONCRETE OBSTRUCTION AT MIDDLE ROAD The Contractor was directed to remove a concrete obstruction at the Middle Road. The existing concrete obstruction was not shown on the contract plans and conflicted with the installation of the Middle Road. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisons. (Reference FCO # 128) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,967.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 CONCRETE OBSTRUCTION AT PAVING AREA NEAR POWER BUILDING 3A The Contractor was directed to remove a concrete obstruction at the area paving between Power Building 3A and the Middle Road. The existing concrete obstruction was not shown on the contract plans and conflicted with the finished asphalt paving grades. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)8 of the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #130) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,296.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE une 4, 98 JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. P1-20; AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS D L M N L N AND N N FAVINb Al L N Job No. P1-20 Item 3 TEMPORARY ASPHALT PAVING REMOVAL The Contractor was directed to remove a section of temporary asphalt paving on the North Perimeter Road. The P1-20 contract construction schedule calls for the installation of the North Road in two phases. The temporary paving was installed on the North Road in between the two phases by another contractor to maintain access to the existing main entrance. The temporary paving needed to be removed ,just before the installation of the second phase of the North Road permanent paving and was not shown on the contract plans. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #127) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,652.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 ADDITIONAL CHLORINE PIPE AT BAR SCREEN CHANNELS The Contractor was directed to install additional chlorine piping in bar screen channel numbers 3 and 4. These channels are designated for future flows. The contract drawings do not include chlorine piping in the referenced channels. Installing the additional piping now would result in a safer working area and eliminate the need for an extensive plant shut down in the future due to the orientation of the operating channels. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #135) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,550.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS °H-2^ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Ei hteen (18) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Company DATE une 8 JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1 JOB N0. P1-20• AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS NO AN • RE LACEMENT 0 BOILE IPING LE NOUTS; ND G ADIN AN Job No. P1-20 Item 5 INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL INFLUENT PUMP The Contractor was directed to install a Districts-furnished influent pump on a pump pad in the pump room. This pump will be stored at this location and will not be connected electrically or mechanically to the new influent pumping system. The extra costs involved in this item include new sole plates, blind flange bolts, pump installation and painting, and modifications to the existing testing pipe. The storage of this future pump, actually in its designed location at thi3 time, was found to be cost effective and eliminated the need of multiple relocations due to the ongoing rehabilitation project to the existing Warehouse. The contract plans did not include the installation of this future pump. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference PCH #78, FCO #118) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,364.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 REINFORCEMENT MODIFICATIONS AT TUNNEL NO. 4 The Contractor was directed to modify the steel reinforcement in Tunnel No. 4 at the bar screen and pump room structures. The structural section specified for Tunnel No. 4 in the contract plans was in error and needed modification to satisfy design loading criteria. These modifications involved additional reinforcement for tunnel walls and decks. Also, a conflict existed with the pump room exterior counterforts and Tunnel No. 4 walls and decks. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference PCH #64, FCO #86) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,079.20 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Ei hteen (18) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 4, 9 JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1 JOB N0. P1-20• AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS RE EM IN N A N N Job No. P1-20 Item 7 REMOVABLE WALL PANELS AT CHLORINE BUILDING The Contractor was directed to modify the walls in front of the bulk chlorine storage tank facility at the Chlorine Building. The walls were modified to be easily removable to accommodate the future addition or removal of bulk chlorine storage tanks. The modifications included additional wall steel reinforcing, new support angles and new lifting eyes. These modifications were not part of the original contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #111, PCH #73) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,997.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 8 ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE FINISH MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to modify the finish to the exterior concrete surfaces exposed to view throughout the job site. An architectural finish consisting of sand and cement will be applied to non-fluted concrete surfaces in lieu of the specified sandblast finish. Upon review of a test panel of the specified sandblast finish, it was determined to change the finish requirement to a smooth, flat finish. This item also includes the costs for modifying the concrete finish of all fluted surfaces. The fluted surfaces will then match the above-mentioned architectural finish. The Contractor was also directed to provide a similar architectural finish to the existing Metering and Diversion (M&D) Structure's concrete walls. The specifications do not require fluted concrete or the existing M&D structure to receive any special architectural concrete finish. These modifications will attain the desired harmonious architectural finish to all concrete exposed to view. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference PCH #89, FCO #141) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 42,123.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM; 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 82,028.20 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extension to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor. "H-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE v FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Ei hteen (18) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE une 4, 9 JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. P1-20; AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS L L N A DN AN FAVINb AlN SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date October 21, 1987 Original Contract Time 920 Calendar Days Original Completion Date April 27, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 63 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 983 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date June 29, 1990 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 31111 110.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1:6 3'614 91 This Change (Add) (Aed"4) $SF- Amended Contract Price $ 33, 3,643.1 Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: KIEWIT PACIFIC CO ` Q 9—/-87 o truction . anager Date ACCEPTED BY: APP E BY: 0on ractor ate Director of Engineering ate "H-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE June Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM A PLANT N0. 1 JOB N0. P -2 ; C R FOR RIMARY B SIN Al PLANT NO. 2. juts NO. FZ-jZ; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEMS AT PLANT N . 2 JOB N . N L N L B Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Beduet) S 98,811.72 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. P2-33 Item 1 - ADDED CAUSTIC PUMP CIRCUITS According to the contract documents, power to operate the caustic feed pumps at each of the three scrubber complexes was to be provided in each of the three scrubber control panels. Power and control circuitry in the scrubber control panels was, in each case, inadequate to service the electrical load created by the caustic feed pumps during the operation of a scrubber complex. New power panels, control panels and additional wiring will be furnished and installed to provide ample power to operate the caustic feed pumps. Work will be performed on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. At the time the conflict was uncovered the scrubber control panels were fabricated and installed at each of the scrubber complexes and the Contractor was in the process of scheduling and coordinating equipment start-up activities. The long lead time for delivery of the electrical equipment required to execute the change work delayed the start of equipment testing. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 55,387.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 51 Calendar Days Item 2 DELAY IN START OF "H and "I" SCRUBBER MODIFICATIONS The contract requires the Contractor to modify existing foul air scrubbers "H" and "I." Specifications for the modification work limit the Contractor to working an one of the scrubbers at a time so that one scrubber remains in operation at all times. The Contractor planned to perform the scrubber work at an appropriate time prior to the completion of the North Scrubber Complex. During a meeting that was held to discuss procedures for the modification work, the Contractor was advised by staff that he could not start the "H" and "I" "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE June Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT N0. 1 JOB N0. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER N - N 2 8 -3 • UL AE SYSTEMS AT PLAN N N . - 3; N MPR EME TO LI B" BILLIN NN AND DISTRIBUTION TR TU E "A", JOB NO. P2-T4—.- scrubber modifications until after the North Scrubber Complex was operating on a permanent basis. Placing the North Scrubber Complex into permanent operation is a critical path activity. Performing the "H" and "I" scrubber modifications after the North Scrubber Complex completion will extend the contract for the duration of the "H" and "I" work. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 22,750.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 70 Calendar Days Job No. P2-34 Item 3 STEAM SHUNT PIPING CHANGES The schematic diagrams in the plans and the written portion of the detailed specifications provided the design for the steam shunt piping for thirteen digesters at Plant No. 2. The locations selected by the Engineer for the entry of "shunted" heated sludge piping into the various digesters was not consistant with the locations selected by the staff. This change order item provides for the changes to the original routing and connection points of the steam shunt piping systems. Work has been performed on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13,839.98 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 ADDED ASPHALTIC CONCRETE CURB AND TRENCH PAVING The curb and paving provided by this item is work that was added to the scope of the original contract. The curb was placed by the Contractor at the request of the Districts to protect the new landscaping along the Bushard entry road to the east of the Construction Management trailers. In addition, the Maintenance Department installed a new underground city water line between Harris Tunnel and the Plant No. 2 Warehouse. The resulting trench was paved by the Contractor at the request of the Districts. Work was performed on a direct cost plus percentage/ basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,834.74 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "1-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "1-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE June 14, 89 Zurn Constructors, nc. JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM AT N N N PRI R N L N WE . OUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEMS AT PLAN N . N AN DISTRIBUTION U U DB N . FZ-34. TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: S 98,811.72 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 121 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time-made by this and all previously issued Changes Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 121 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Items 1 through 4 above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract ate November 24, 1987 Original Contract Time 540 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 16, 1989 Time Extension This C.O. 121 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 121 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 661 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date September 14, 1989 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price S 15,893,393.00 Prev. Auth.Changes $ 9 ' This Change (Add) (Deduct) S I'72 Amended Contract Price $ 19,951,432.34 "I-3" AGENDA ITEM ##9(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE v FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE June Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS Al PLANT N0. 1 JOB NO. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER M A l NT B N - 6; KS FOR PRIMARY ASINS AT PLANT JOB NO. P -• UL AIR SCRUBOER SYSTEMSPLANT N DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE A NO. Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: tion Manager Uate ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: ;APPZRDBY: wapt /.Q 1aractor — hteate rector of Engineering Date "I-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE June 14. 1989 Zurn onstructors, nc. JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM AT PLANT NJOB NO. P - ; COVERS FOR RIMARY BASINS AT PLANT PLAN] N L NN LANU �B A-, J B P -34. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduet) $ 96,311.08 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. P1-26 Item 1 PLANT NO. 1 SCRUBBER COMPLEX DRAIN CHANGES The existing 12-inch drain line that was to be utilized by the Odor Control Contractor for the Plant No. 1 Scrubber Complex Drain System was not in the location shown on the drawings. The line was partially encased in concrete and was provided with a concrete thrust block. Neither of these conditions were addressed on the plans. This change order item provides for the removal of concrete and for the realignment of the 12-inch drain. Work was performed on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 866.21 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 PROVIDE CONCRETE PAD AT PLANT NO. 1, POWER BUILDING 4 DIESEL TANK FILL BOXES The fill boxes as originally placed were set in asphaltic concrete paving. Diesel spills during the process of placing fuel in the underground tanks deteriorated the paving. This change order item provides for the removal of the existing asphaltic paving and for the construction of a new reinforced concrete pad to take its place. Work was performed on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,495.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4� P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE June 9 urn Constructors, nc. JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB N0. P1-25• FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSitM Ai PLANT NO. XB LAN N L BLLN ANU N NU. Job No. P2-33 Item 3 MODIFICATIONS TO FOUL AIR DUCTWORK AT HEADWORKS "C" At the time the P2-33 FRP Foul Air Ductwork system for Headworks "C" was designed, the plans for the construction of the P2-37 Conveyor Building were not available to the P2-33 designer. The 54-inch round FRP system as originally designed would have passed horizontally through the roof section and parapet walls of the new P2-37 Conveyor Building. To eliminate the conflict with the new structure and to minimize the height of the new foul air ductwork, the line was designed to pass through the new Conveyor Building ,just under the roof and between the new roof trusses. The ductwork was changed for 54-inch round FRP to 36-inch by 70-inch balsa core ductwork. In addition, this item provides for the removal of the abandoned 72-inch exhaust stack at Headworks "C", inclusion of a roof hatch to cover the 72-inch roof opening and for a 72-inch cover plate to cover the opening in grade floor where the stack once existed. The cost of the added work associated with this change was negotiated with the Contractor. Work will be performed on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 60,577.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 METHANE SENSORS FOR CIRCULAR PRIMARY CLARIFIERS The Contractor was directed to install methane sensors (gas detection sensors) in each dome enclosure (17 domes) . Specifications for the sensors were not included in the specifications. The sensors were provided in accordance with Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 25,855.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE June urn onstructors, nc. JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM AT PLAN N JOB NO. . CO PRIMARY BASINS AT L T L N . B N . FZ N BL NL AN U JBN Item 5 RELOCATION OF 10-INCH DIGESTER CLEANING LINE The existing 10-inch digester cleaning line that is routed through the plant tunnel system leaves the tunnels through the east wall of the Carney Tunnel Extension and runs easterly in the underground to the sludge drying beds. New underground Foul Air Line "A" was shown on the plans to have the same general alignment as the 10-inch sludge line. The resulting conflict: was eliminated by re-routing the 10-inch line around the new 48-inch foul air line. Work was performed on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,517.87 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 96,311.08 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any revisions to the Contract Time made by this and any previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. "J-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. 40. Fourteen (14) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE one urn Constructors, Inc. JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB N0. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM AT PLA�T N9.;1N - UUL AIK bLKUbk5LK NYSILM Al FLANIN N . --ff1,—ffT1CrffGT-TUffN-ET AND N STRUCTURE "A", JOB N -34. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Da-Fe— November 24, 1987 Original Contract Time 540 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 16, 1989 Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 121 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 661 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date September 14, 1989 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 15 893,393.00 Prev. Auth.Changes $ This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 9b'3T1. OB Amended Contract Price $Z6,b3Yd3.42 Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: 4;�'? a-/a, onstruction Manager Uate ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: APPR VET BY: T�Qfra or a e/ irec or of •ngineering a e "J-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: ENTRANCES, SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $26,462.14 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 FENCING MODIFICATION The Contractor was directed to install six stands of "V"-type barbed wire on top of the fencing at the east property line. The plans specified a 45 degree angle with three strands of barbed wire which is not consistent with Districts' new fencing standards. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #9) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 667.75 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 MANHOLE ADJUSTMENT The Contractor was directed to adjust the Newhope trunk line manhole to grade in preparation for new paving in the area. The manhole was located in the new east perimeter roadway and was not shown on the the contract drawings. The manhole had a PVC liner which needed repairs after the adjustment was performed. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #13) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,199.41 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 3 RELOCATION OF TELEPHONE CONDUIT The Contractor was directed to install approximately 250 feet of 2-inch PVC conduit for telephone lines at the new main entrance roadway. The original telephone service conduit was not shown to be relocated on the contract plans and conflicted with new area paving at the new entrance. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #14) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,080.50 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June JOB: ENTRANCES SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1 B0. Item 4 MANHOLE SECTION REPLACEMENT The Contractor was directed to replace the manhole flat top section of the existing Ellis Avenue manhole located at the new main entrance. The flat top section conflicted with new paving grades as shown on the contract plans. Upon investigation, the existing manhole section was badly deteriorated and it was decided to replace it. The new manhole section was polyurethane coated to prevent future deterioration. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #15) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 9,218.46 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 THRUST BLOCK ADDITION _ The Contractor was directed to install a concrete thrust block on the 8-inch DIP waste hauler drain line near the Metering and Diversion Structure. The drain line was originally designed as a gravity line. It was decided during the construction stages of the project to change the design of the drain line to a force main due to the amount of solids in the flow and possible pipe slope problems. This change required the re-excavation of this line and the installation of a concrete thrust block at a fitting approximately 10 feet below finished grade. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) MA of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #16) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 1,109.02 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 RESTROOM ADDITION The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a new restroom facility and attach it to the contract-specified guard shack at the new main entrance. It was determined that a restroom was needed at the guard shack and it was not provided for in the contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH N7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 20,852.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: ENTRANCES SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, No. Item 7 MCC DELETION The Contractor was directed to delete the Motor Control Center (MCC) "U" in the Metering and Diversion Structure. An MCC unit is being installed in another project in the same location and it was determined to be more feasible to extend this MCC in lieu of installing an MCC "U". This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH #1) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 4,400.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 8 WASTE HAULER DUMP STATION DELETIONS The Contractor was directed to delete and modify asphalt paving, concrete and piping at the Waste Hauler Dump Station. During construction of the project, it was determined that modifications were required to the waste hauler dump drains. These modifications were needed to satisfy the sampling requirements of the Districts' Industrial Waste Department. It was determined to be more cost effective to perform the modifications in a future project. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH p8) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 3,265.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 26,462.14 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor. K-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 ` P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �..r FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: ENTRANCES SITE SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date November 10, 1988 Original Contract Time 250 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 17, 1989 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days _ Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 250 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date July 17, 1989 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1 590 000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $�I5,7�5) This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 14 Amended Contract Price $ 4 Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOM MH DED BY: �& �-/-a9 ons ruc ion Manager Date KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. ACCEPTED BY: APPRO/V)�O BY: ntract r ate Director of Lngineering liateW "K-4" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT AN NO. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dedu6t) $ 33,600.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item No. 1 - RE-ROUTE EXISTING UTILITIES AT NEW METER "A" STRUCTURE During the initial excavation for the placement of shoring for and the construction of new meter "A" structure, the Contractor uncovered an existing natural gas line and an existing city water line. Both of the existing utilities were in direct conflict with the shoring system and the new reinforced concrete meter box. The two utilities were not shown on the plans and had to be re-routed around the new meter box construction area. Work was performed on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)8 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,006.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item No. 2 - CHANGES TO NEW CONTAINMENT FACILITY AT DEWATERING Details for the construction of the 2-foot, 6-inch high north wall of the new containment structure at the existing dewatering building created a 3-inch void between the two structures. In addition to the problem of forming and stripping the 3-inch void, the void itself would have become a collector of debris and chemically laden wash-down water. Modification of the details provided for the wall to be capped to eliminate the void and to still maintain separation of the two concrete structures. In addition to the wall detail change, the means that were to be utilized by the Contractor to build a bulkhead in the containment area utility trench was also changed. Details of the trench bulkhead indicated that only one existing chemical line would pass through the new bulkhead but there were two existing chemical lines (one insulated) and three existing electrical conduits. Due to the existence of the additional lines, details were provided for a grouted bulkhead in lieu of the concrete specified. Work was performed on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ��- ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,243.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "L-1'" AGENDA ITEM #9( j ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5' P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-37 Item No. 3 - CHANGE TYPE FRESH AIR FAN AT NEW CONVEYOR BUILDING The fresh air fan specified for installation at the new conveyor building was to be a galvanized steel unit. Due to the highly corrosive atmosphere at the location of fan installation, immediately north of Headworks "C", staff determined that a fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) type fan should be installed. Additional cost for this change was calculated on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 869.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item No. 4 - INCREASE SIZE - PLUG VALVES AND KNIFE GATES FOR DIGESTERS "A" AND "B" Plans for the replacement of existing ball valves and for the installation of new knife gates indicated that all new valves were to be 6-inch. The size of existing piping associated with the installation of new valves was actually 8-inch. The 6-inch size valves were approved and delivered to the site. This change order item provides for the increase in valve size for 20 valves, increase in the size and quantity of bolts, and for additional shipping. Additional costs calculated on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,732.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item No. 5 - DELETE CATCH BASIN AND DRAINAGE WORK AT MAINTENANCE BUILDING Plans call for the construction of a new catch basin and for the improvement of site drainage in an area east of the maintenance building in the vicinity of the surge tower. This change order item provides for the deletion of these improvements because of plans to renovate the entire maintenance building area under a future contract. The Contractor provided a fair and reasonable credit for the deleted work on a direct cost basis. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: (S 7,193.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 �.,./ P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT Item No. 6 - CHANGE ROUTING - HIGH STRENGTH SLUDGE PIPING SYSTEM Plans for the high strength sludge piping system indicated that the four system discharge locations were in the pump rooms for Digesters "C", "D", "F", and "G". At a point in time prior to the start of work on the P2-37 contract, the Districts selected the location of the four discharge connections and installed valved fittings in the walls of Digesters "C", "D", "F" and "G". The four locations prepared by the Districts, on the exterior portion of the digester walls, were not addressed in the high strength sludge system piping plans. This change order item provides for the change of the sludge system pipe routing and for the connection of same to the fittings installed by the Districts. Additional costs calculated on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. . ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 16,399.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item No. 7 - EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION - ROUTING CHANGE - HIGH STRENGTH SLUDGE PIPING This change order item provides for the exploratory excavation of the underground high strength sludge piping system described in Item 6 above. The underground route selected by the Districts for the change in the high strength sludge piping installation was located to the west of Digester "C", "D", "F" and "G". Staff was not certain of the quantity and location of existing utilities and process piping along the selected route and determined that it would be cost effective to excavate the entire trench line for possible conflicts. Only minor conflicts existed but were eliminated in the design of the modified piping sytem. Costs for this added pipe work were calculated on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 69544.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 33,600.00 TOTAL TIMES EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days "L-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(j ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Two CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF DIGESTER MILESTONE TIME Original Activity Start Date November 2, 1988 Original Activity Duration Time 300 Calendar Days Original Activity Completion Date August 28, 1988 Adjustment Milestone Time This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Adjustment Milestone Time 6 Calendar Days Revised Activity Duration 306 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date September 3, 1989 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date November 2, 1988 Original Contract Time 425 Calendar Days Original Completion Date December 31, 1989 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time No Change Revised Final Completion Due Date No Change Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable "L-4" AGENDA ITEM #90) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-4" i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 �.. P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE June JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB N . P2-37 Contract Price $ 5 395 000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ — This Change (Add) (8edust) $" 33:600.00 Amended Contract Price $ 5, 5� 69� 1.UU Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REC01 NDED BY: - ZonS ruction Manager Uate ZIEBARTH AND ALPER ACCEPTED BY: APPRO D Y: 2/etooaY: i on ac or Date Actor or of Engineering ate "L-5" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 108"ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 May 24, 1989 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineer in Connection with Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 4 with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for design of a steam turbine system to utilize excess heat to produce power, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $68,962.00, as. follows: Engineering Services, (hourly rates Including labor plus overhead at 175%), not to exceed $ 58,602 subconsultants, not to exceed 2,700 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 1,400 Fixed Profit 6,270 Total Addendum No. 4, not to exceed $ 68,972 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Is/Don E. Smith /s/Rona rey Ronald B Don mith oeety Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes 1 ' Director of Engineering �..✓ Selection Committee "M" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "M" RESOLUTION NO. 89-51 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS RE �►� DESIGN OF JOB NO. J-19 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-19, PROVIDING FOR DESIGN OF STEAM TURBINE SYSTEM TO BE INCORPORATED INTO SAID PROJECT xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for preliminary design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for additional services necessary relative to application and processing of a Permit to Construct from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) ; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for additional services required for background NOx and health risk assessment modeling information required by SCAQMD; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to said agreement provided for phased final design of said project; Phase I work to commence immediately for electrical system configuration studies, digester gas system modifications and ongoing South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) permitting interface, and Phase II work for final design, construction and training services to commence upon receipt of a permit to construct from SCAQMD; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers to provide for design of a steam turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of engine heat to `..d produce additional electricity; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on May 10, "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" 1989, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said additional services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 4 dated June 14, 1989, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated July 9, 1986, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, for preliminary design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for design of a steam turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of engine heat to produce additional electricity, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $68,972.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $3,592,838.00 to an amount not to exceed $3,661,810.00: Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 175%, not to exceed $58,602.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 2,700.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 1,400.00 Fixed Profit 6,270.00 TOTAL Addendum No. 4, not to exceed $68,972.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 4 in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. "N-2" AGENDA ITEM N9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" RESOLUTION NO. 89-52 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES �.►� AGREEMENT WITH JONES 8 STOKES AS IATES, IN . FOR PREPARATION OF AN EIR FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE COLLECT ON, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN PROGRAMMATIC EIR A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JONES 8 STOKES ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PREPARATION OF AN EIR FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN PROGRAMMATIC EIR, PROVIDING FOR A REALLOCATION OF THE COSTS AMONG CATEGORIES WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT k t * * * * k * * * * k k k * * k WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Jones 8 Stokes Associates, Inc. for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Element of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Programmatic EIR; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said Agreement with Jones 8 Stokes Associates, Inc. provided for deletion of the marine subconsultant services of Kinnetics Laboratories, Inc. and substitute Jones 8 Stokes' personnel for said work; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with Jones 8 Stokes Associates to provide for a reallocation of the costs among the categories within said agreement with no change in the maximum authorized compensation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated June 14, 1989, to that certain "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-11, Professional Services Agreement dated March 9, 1988, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and Jones 8 Stokes Associates, Inc., for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities element of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Programmatic Environmental Impact Report, providing for a reallocation of the costs among the categories within said agreement, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said reallocation of costs shall not change the maximum authorized compensation of $213,126.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" RESOLUTION NO. 89-59-2 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT N -11- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTH BRANCH OF THE ROLLING HILLS DRIVE RELIEF SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-11-3 WHEREAS, Sam W. Peterson & Associates, Inc. . District's engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-3. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the project for construction of the North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-3, is hereby approved. Said project was included in the Final Focused Environmental Impact Report on Amendment No. 1 to the Consolidated Master Plan of Treatment Facilities for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 relative to District No. 2 Euclid/Newhope-Placentia Drainage Area approved by the Board of Directors an June 10, 1987. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on June 11, 1987, in accordance with the District's Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Sam W. Peterson & Associates, Inc. , District's engineers, for construction of North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-3, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICT 2 11P-1" bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of 1 the State of California; and, �•r� Section 4. . That the General Nanager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section S. That the Secretary and the District's Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June, 14, 1989. "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICT 2 "P-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Mladen Buntich Construction Company DATE une 14, 1989 JOB: MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE (VAULT) REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS LOCATION5, CONTRACT NO. 3-28R-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Aedust:) $ 72,500.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 BONUS MANHOLES Section 50-8 of the contract specifications provides for a $500.00 per day bonus for certain manholes completed before the specified time of completion. This change order item provides compensation for early completion of two "bonus manholes" which have been completed since Change Order No. 4, executed on April 12, 1989 for bonus on three manholes. Manhole No. Specified Time Actual Time Bonus Time Bonus Due 59 40 Days 11 Days 29 Days $ 14,500.00 63 40 Days 12 Days 28 Days $ 14000.0.00 '500 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 28,500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 ADD MANHOLE REHABILITATION AT VALLEY VIEW STREET AND LA CANADA AVENUE The Contractor was directed to furnish all labor, materials and equipment for reconstruction of manhole at the intersection of Valley View Street and La Canada Avenue in Buena Park. Also included are bypass facilities, traffic control and safety requirements. It was determined in the best interests of the District to include this work now versus doing the work in a few months under a new contract. The City of Buena Park will be repairing Valley View Street before our new contract can be awarded. If we waited to reconstruct this manhole we would be excavating in the newly paved street. This item was negotiated for a fixed cost pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 44,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 20 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 72,500.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 20 Calendar Da s "!d-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) - DISTRICT 3 �0-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92798 CHANGE ORDER �'••' C.O. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Mladen Buntich Construction Company DATE June 14, 989 JOB: MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE (VAULT) REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and any previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 20 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as previously granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date July 9, 1987 Original Contract Time 750 Calendar Days Original Completion Date - July 27, 1989 Time Extension this C.O. 20 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 38 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 788 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date September 3, 1989 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 4 317 000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ ,3 4 This Change (Add) (Dedwet:) $ 56OT�— Amended Contract Price $ 4,537,135.94 Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECO NDED BY: Topttruction manager Date MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ACCEPTED BY. BY: APPR EC Bq4UZI, (, on tractor a e � ector o •ngtneertng ate "(a-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) - DISTRICT 3 "0-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Christeve Corporation DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Pedwet) $ 163,677.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 UNDISCLOSED SERVICE CONNECTION The Contractor encountered an undisclosed 6-inch VCP sewer service connection at Station No. 27+50 while potholing for other utilities. The Contractor was directed to repair the sewer connection. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,707.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 UNDISCLOSED NATURAL GAS LINE The Contractor encountered a 2-inch plastic natural gas line within the area of the trench excavation at Station No. 30+07. The gas line was shown outside of the excavation area on the drawings and marked on the pavement by the utility company as outside of the excavation. The Contractor was directed to move the plastic gas line out of the way during excavation and placement of the sewer pipe and then move it back. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,567.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 3 ADD THREE ACCESS TEES AND MANHOLES The Contractor was directed to furnish and install three accesses to the force main at Station Nos. 5+00, 25+30 and 39+20. Each access consists of a 36x20 MJ tee and flange, two flex couplings, stainless steel nuts and bolts, polyurethane coating, a 72-inch manhole and all appurtenances, plus labor and equipment to construct same in the amount of $22,531.00 The accesses are needed for maintenance purposes and dewatering adjacent gravity sewer lines when required for maintenance and construction. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 67,593.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "R-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) (1) - DISTS. 5 & 6 "R-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Christeve Corporation DATE June JOB: Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31 Item 4 REMOVAL OF CONTAMINATED SOIL Reference is made to the Detailed Specifications, Section 52-16. The referenced specifications indicated that contaminated soil may or may not be present and therefore no provisions for payment for the removal of contaminated soil were included in the contract. The Contractor did, in fact, encounter contaminated soil and was directed to take special precautions and transport the material to a designated disposal site. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: E 8,900.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 INSTALL NEW 36-INCH LINE AT LOWER GRADE The Contractor encountered several existing utilities between Station Nos. 21+25 and 45+20 which were lower in elevation than shown on the drawings. The Contractor was directed to lower the grade of the new 36-inch ductile iron pipe in order to accommodate the utility lines. The cost of this item includes additional excavation and Class II aggregate base backfill as specified in Section 52-16 of the contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: E 29,327.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 ADDITIONAL ASPHALT PAVING AND BACKFILL The Contractor was directed to widen the. excavation between Station Nos. 21+00 and 27+65, and between Station Nos. 36+50 and 45+20'to remove the old existing 27-inch steel force main. The old line varied from the location shown on the drawings and from the location of the new 36-inch line being installed at the above-noted stations. In order to keep the new 36-inch line on the correct alignment, the excavation was widened which resulted in additional Class II aggregate base backfill and asphalt paving. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)8 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 32,583.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days �...� "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) (1) - DISTS, 5 & 6 "R-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Christeve Corporation DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31 Item 7 BONUS PAYMENT The contract specified 180 days for contract completion with provisions including liquidated damages of $500.00 per day for each day of delay past the 180 days and bonus payments of $500.00 per day for each day of completion prior to June 16, 1989. (Reference: Detailed Specifications, Section 50-8) Actual Original Completion Days Completion Date Bonus Date Date Bonus Bonus/Day Bonus July 9, 1989 June 16, 1989 May 5, 1989 42 $500.00 $ 21,000.00 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 21,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 163,677.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by any previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date January 11,1989 Original Contract Time 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 9, 1989 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 180 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date July 9, 1989 Actual Final Completion Date May 5, 1989 �i Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable "R-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) (1) - DISTS. 5 & 6 "R-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Christeve Corporation DATE June 14, 1989 JOB: Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31 Original Contract Price $ 1,491 434.01 Prev. Auth. Changes $— This Change (Add) (Dedus%) $ Amended Contract Price $�5,1T1 DO Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REC NMENDED BY: car nstruc tion manager ate CHRISTEVE CORPORATION ' EP APP 0 BY: F�4 o ractor Date rector o Engineering—L e "R-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) (1) - DISTS. 5 & 6 "R-4" RESOLUTION NO. 89-60 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-31 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 5-31, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, 00 HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Christeve Corporation, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, on May 5, 1989; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recomnendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Farce Main, Contract No. 5-31, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated January 11, 1989; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Christeve Corporation setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 5, acting for itself and on behalf of District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to �...� execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. S"' AGENDA ITEM #9(t ) (2) - DISTS. 5 & 6 "S" RESOLUTION NO. 89-62 ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM RANCHO TOMAS, IN LI FORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY APOLL D V L PMENT CORP RATION RE C NTRA T NO. 14-1-1A A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 6, 7 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM RANCHO TOMAS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY APOLLO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE BAKER- GISLER INTERCEPTOR, FROM FAIRVIEW ROAD TO PLANT NO. 1, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1A The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated May 23, 1989, wherein a permanent ingress and egress easement, in the vicinity of the Santa Ana River Channel to the Greenvilee-Banning Channel northerly of Gisler Avenue, for right of way required in connection with construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, is granted to County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14, is hereby accepted from Rancho Tomas Inc., a California Corporation, formerly Apollo Development Corporation, a California Corporation; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That payment in the amount of $37,700.00 plus costs for said right-of-way is hereby authorized; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. l PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. v "T" AGENDA ITEM #9(u) - DISTS. G, 7 & 14 "T" RESOLUTION NO. 89-64 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF COSTA MESA-FOR A COOPERATIVE PROJECT TO INCLUDE CITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO BAKER STREET IN DISTRICT'S CONTRACT N . 14-1-1B A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 7 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF COSTA MESA FOR A COOPERATIVE PROJECT TO INCLUDE CITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO BAKER STREET IN THE DISTRICT'S CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, FROM BRISTOL STREET TO FAIRVIEW ROAD, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1B WHEREAS, the Districts have identified the need for an interceptor line in Baker Street, designated as the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B; and, WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa has identified the need for street Improvements and maintenance of Baker Street between Bristol Street and Fairview Road; and, WHEREAS, public inconvenience can be minimized and a cost savings can be realized by the joint construction of the Districts' sewer line project and the City's street improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated June 14, 1989, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 7 and 14 and the City of Costa Mesa, relative to a cooperative project to include City street improvements to Baker Street in the Districts' contract for construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B, is hereby approved and accepted; and, "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "U-1" Section 2. That said cooperative project shall be administered by the � Ir Sanitation Districts, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the `�►' agreement. The City of Costa Mesa shall pay all costs associated with street Improvements to Baker Street between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, including engineering, design, excavation, surveying and inspection, estimated to be $1,600,000.00; and, Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #S(v) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "U-2" RESOLUTION NO. 89-53 AWARDING JOB NO. P1-34-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2 * * k k * k k k * * * * k k k The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which Is a portion of the previously-approved Master Plan Report for the Joint Treatment Works. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report covering this project was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 10, 1985; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, be awarded to Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. in the total amount of $19,085,600.00 in accordance with the terns of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, `..,.� Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby "V-1" AGENDA ITEM k12(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "�-1 " authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor j for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, `•••' In form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section S. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. "V-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA / May 23, 1989 11:00 a.m. IW40 EW5 AVENUE 60.8127 ONE ADDENDUM Aa. AUNDAN wUNieix VeIU0 UALIw RNie 921289121 0IA19W.9a11 BID TABULATION SHEET JOB NO. P1-34-2 PROJECT TITLE Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION New Truck Loading Facility, Sludge Transfer System, Plant Water Pump Station, and 12 KV Service Center ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 22.4 Million BUDGET AMOUNT $ 24.0 Million ====x=======CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID=====__ 1. Advanco Constructors, Div. of $19,085,600.00 Zurn Constructors, Inc., Upland, CA 2. Brinderson Corporation, Irvine, CA $19,730,000.00 3. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. $19,800,000.00 Camarillo, CA 4. Steve P. Rados, Inc., Santa Ana, CA $20,686,289.00 S. Kiewit Pacific Co., Santa Fe Springs, CA $20,882,000.00 6. S. A. Healy Co. , Azusa, CA $23,691,524.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. in the bid amount of $19,085,600.00 as the lowest and best bid. `..d "ff&ei M. Dawes Director of Engineering "V-3" AGENDA ITEM #12(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-3" RESOLUTION NO. 89-56 r AMENDING RULES OF PROCEDURE RESOLUTION NO. 87-51 RE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-51 ESTABLISHING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF THE DISTRICTS RE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP WHEREAS, Resolution No. 87-51 established rules of procedure to facilitate the orderly handling of business to come before the Joint Administrative Organization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California; and, WHEREAS, these Boards deem it desirable and appropriate to amend said rules of procedure relative to membership of the Executive Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1. That Section 13.(a) of Resolution No. 87-51, establishing rules of procedure for the conduct of business of the Districts, be amended to read as follows: 13. STANDING COMMITTEES: (a) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - There shall be a permanent Committee designated as the Executive Committee which shall consist of the Chairman of the Board of Directors Of each District, or other District Director as designated by the Chairman, the Directors who represent the Orange County Board of Supervisors, and the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. Each past Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall also serve as a member of the Executive Committee, provided that said person serves as an active Director of a District Board. Any "W-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (6) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-1" person designated as an alternate member of the Executive .. Committee must be an elected official of the same District as the regular Executive Committee member. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be the Chairman of the Executive Committee. The Committee may fix a regular meeting time and place or may meet at the call of the Chairman. The Committee may consider any matters related to the ,joint ownership, operation and construction of all the Districts and make recommendations thereon to the Joint Boards of Directors of the Districts." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (6) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-2" RESOLUTION NO. 89-57 APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO AGREEMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT OF GENERAL COUNSEL A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO AGREEMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT OF GENERAL COUNSEL The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 10 to that certain Agreement for Employment of General Counsel dated May 1, 1975, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, and Thomas L. Woodruff, Attorney at Law, providing for an adjustment of the fee schedule for legal services performed as General Counsel for said Districts, as indicated on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution, effective July 1, 1989, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said amendment on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. "X-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (7) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-1" FEE SCHEDULE FOR LEGAL SERVICES PERFORMED BY THOMAS L. WOODRUFF AS GENERAL COUNSEL EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1989 Thomas L. Woodruff - $140.00/hour Other Partners of Firm - 140.00/hour Associate Attorneys - 115.00/hour Paralegals - 60.00/hour Appearance by Counsel at conferences or meetings - 400.00/day (or $140.00/hour whichever is less) EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 89-57 "X-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(5)(7) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS June 1, 1989 EI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ,BBAA Ews AVENUE Pa BOX Biel / County Sanitation District No. 1 EWNTUN V4 Y,CAU, .We Supplemental Sewer Service User Fee Report Fiscal 1989-90 District No. 1 modified its long-range financial plan in 1984 to include a supplemental user fee for single family residences, multi-family residences and non-residential properties. The fee was and continues to be necessary to make up a shortfall in ad valorem tax revenues and to provide increased funding necessary for operations and maintenance as well as necessary modification and replacement of capital facilities. The proposed sewer use fee amounts are based upon financial studies and analysis by District staff as reflected in the 1989-90 budget recommendations by the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee for Joint Works Operating and Working Capital Funds which include increases in anticipated expenses to maintain and operate the joint treatment plants. Personnel related expenses are expected to increase as a result of newly authorized positions, filling currently authorized but unfilled positions and salary and wage adjustments provided in existing MOU's with employee groups. Chemical expenses are expected to increase as new odor control facilities requiring chemical additions are placed into service and as more flow receives advanced primary or physical/chemical treatment. Increased solids handling and disposal costs are budgeted as landfill disposal costs are increased and as sludge reuse/disposal options become more costly because of regulatory requirements and increased production of sludge. New odor control facilities will also require additional use of utilities and those expenses are budgeted to increase. Other general repair, maintenance and operating expenses are also budgeted to increase as a result of inflation, additional flow, regulatory requirements and increased complexity and age of the facilities. District No. 1 shares in these joint works operations and maintenance expenses on the basis of flaw. Engineering estimates for 1989-90 indicate that the District's share of joint works operations and maintenance expenses will be $4,092,000. When the individual District operations and maintenance expenses and dry period funding requirements are added and the other projected revenue sources are deducted, the aggregate amount of supplemental user fees required is calculated to be $3,202,000. Using the Orange County Assessor's Office report of residential units and non-residential building square feet, the Finance Department has calculated the following supplemental user fee data: Class Number Rate Amount Raised Single Family Residence 28,068 $45/unit $1,263,000 Multi-Family Residence 17,100 $27/unit 462,000 Non Residential 46,166,558 sq. ft. $32/1000 sq. ft. 1.477,000 Total $3,202,000 This report is based upon data received from all Departments of the County Sanitation Districts, the Orange County Assessor's Office and various regulatory agencies. The calcu- lations are based on metered and historical data and estimates and were performed by staff. The fees are reasonable, directly related to costs and based upon average sewer use by `,�/ property type. Users placing a heavy demand on the sewerage system, either by quantity or nature of discharge, are assessed a separate additional fee. "Y" AGENDA ITEM #26(a) - DISTRICT 1 "Y" ORDINANCE NO. 112 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 109 ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 111 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the District; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992; and, C. That the new sewer use fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Table A, as adopted by Section 2 of Ordinance No. 109, is hereby amended to read as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance. Section 2: This Ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1989. Section 3: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to .the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. "Z-1" AGENDA ITEM #26(b) - DISTRICT 1 "Z-1" PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of erectors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California _2- �..� "Z-2" AGENDA ITEM #26(b) - DISTRICT 1 "Z-2" RESOLUTION NO. 89-58-1 DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 1989-90 PROPERTY TAX BILLS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of -County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111; and, WHEREAS, California Health 8 Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such charges, as adopted by District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, its general taxes. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to California Health 8 Safety Code Section 5473, the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer service charges, as established by Ordinance No. 112, on the 1989-90 property tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this resolution remains in effect; and, `..� Section 2. That pursuant to California Health 8 Safety Code Section 5473, this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed "AA-1" AGENDA ITEM #26(d) - DISTRICT 1 "AA-1" or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by I Ordinance No. 112, is changed; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order set forth in Section 1 herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. "AA-2" AGENDA ITEM #26(d) - DISTRICT 1 "AA-2" COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICTS May 31, 1989 of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 11 ELLISAVENUE 10A Count "Sanitation District No. 5 AG.a011 aouxruN VALLEr.nUEoaNA 92lae•e+21 Supplemental Sewer Service User Fee Report nt.i asa.a.,t Fiscal 1989-90 District No. 5 modified its long-range financial plan in 1981 to include a supplemental user fee for single family residences, multi-family residences and non-residential properties. The fee was and continues to be necessary to make up a shortfall in ad valorem tax revenues and to provide increased funding necessary for operations and maintenance as well as necessary modification and replacement of capital facilities. The proposed sewer use fee amounts are based upon financial studies and analysis by District staff as reflected in the 1989-90 budget recommendations by the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee for Joint Works Operating and Working Capital Funds which include increases in anticipated expenses to maintain and operate the joint treatment plants. Personnel related expenses are expected to increase as a result of newly authorized positions, filling currently authorized but unfilled positions and salary and wage adjustments provided in existing MOD's with employee groups. Chemical expenses are expected to increase as new odor control facilities requiring chemical additions are placed into service and as more flaw receives advanced primary or physical/chemical treatment. Increased solids handling and disposal costs are budgeted as landfill disposal costs are increased and as sludge reuse/disposal options become more costly because of regulatory requirements and increased production of sludge. New odor control facilities will also require additional use of utilities and those expenses are budgeted to increase. Other general repair, maintenance and operating expenses are also budgeted to Increase as a result of inflation, additional flow, regulatory requirements and increased complexity and age of the facilities. District No. 5 shares in these joint works operations and maintenance expenses on the basis of flow. Engineering estimates for 1989-90 indicate that the District's share of joint works operations and maintenance expenses will be $2,026,000. When the individual District operations and maintenance expenses and dry period funding requirements are added and the other projected revenue sources are deducted, the aggregate amount of supplemental user fees required is calculated to be $1,149,000. Using the Orange County Assessor's Office report of residential units and non-residential building square feet, the Finance Department has calculated the following supplemental user fee data: Class Number Rate Amount Raised Single Family Residence 14,064 $45/unit S 633,000 Multi-Family Residence 10,670 $27/unit 288,000 Non Residential 7,132,191 sq. ft. $32/1000 sq. ft. 228,000 Total $1,149,000 This report is based upon data received from all Departments of the County Sanitation Districts, the Orange County Assessor's Office and various regulatory agencies. The calcu- lations are based on metered and historical data and estimates and were performed by staff. �''The fees are reasonable, directly related to costs and based upon average sewer use by property type. Users placing a heavy demand on the sewerage system, either by quantity or nature of discharge, are assessed a separate additional fee. "BB" AGENDA ITEM #29(a) - DISTRICT 5 "BB" ORDINANCE NO. 519 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 516 ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: . . .. A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the District; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992; and, C. That the new sewer use fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Table A, as adopted by Section 2 of Ordinance No. 516, is hereby amended to read as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance. Section 2: This Ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1989. Section 3: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. •CC-1" AGENDA ITEM #29(b) - DISTRICT 5 "CC-1" PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California -2 "CC-2" AGENDA ITEM #29(b) - DISTRICT 5 "CC-2" RESOLUTION NO. 89-61-5 DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 198 70 PRFERTY TAX BILLS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; and, WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such charges, as adopted by District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, its general taxes. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer service charges, as established by Ordinance No. 519, on the 1969-90 property tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this resolution remains in effect; and, Section 2. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed "DD-l " AGENDA ITEM #29(d) - DISTRICT 5 "DD-1" or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by Ordinance No. 519, is changed; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order set forth in Section I herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. "DD-2" AGENDA ITEM #29(d) - DISTRICT 5 "DD-2" COUNTY SANITATION DisTPoCTS May 31, 1989 N ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10W EW9 AVENNE 0 WX O1]7 County Sanitation District No. 6 FOUNTAIN VALY.M110A IA 227E . Supplemental Sewer Service User Fee Report 71..96E-aa11 Fiscal 1989-90 District No. 6 modified its long-range financial plan in 1983 to include a supplemental user fee for single family residences, multi-family residences and non-residential properties. The fee was and continues to be necessary to make up a shortfall in ad valorem tax revenues and to provide increased funding necessary for operations and maintenance as well as necessary modification and replacement of capital facilities. The proposed sewer use fee amounts are based upon financial studies and analysis by District staff as reflected in the 1989-90 budget recommendations by the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee for Joint Works Operating and Working Capital Funds which include increases in anticipated expenses to maintain and operate the joint treatment plants. Personnel related expenses are expected to increase as a result of newly authorized positions, filling currently authorized but unfilled positions and salary and wage adjustments provided in existing MOD's with employee groups. Chemical expenses are expected to increase as new odor control facilities requiring chemical additions are placed into service and as more flow receives advanced primary or physical/chemical treatment. Increased solids handling and disposal costs are budgeted as landfill disposal costs are Increased and as sludge reuse/disposal options become more costly because of regulatory requirements and increased production of sludge. New odor control facilities will also require additional use of utilities and those expenses are budgeted to increase. Other general repair, maintenance and operating expenses are also budgeted to increase as a result of inflation, additional flow, regulatory requirements and increased complexity and age of the facilities. District No. 6 shares in these joint works operations and maintenance expenses on the basis of flow. Engineering estimates for 1989-90 indicate that the District's share of joint works operations and maintenance expenses will be $2,587,000. When the individual District operations and maintenance expenses and dry period funding requirements are added and the other projected revenue sources are deducted, the aggregate amount of supplemental user fees required is calculated to be $2,077,000. Using the Orange County Assessor's Office report of residential units and non-residential building square feet, the Finance Department has calculated the following supplemental user fee data: Class Number Rate Amount Raised Single Family Residence 19,154 $49/unit $ 939,000 Multi-Family Residence 17,664 $29/unit 512,000 Non Residential 17,874,795 sq. ft. $35/1000 sq. ft. 626,000 Total JL2L7 000 This report is based upon data received from all Departments of the County Sanitation Districts, the Orange County Assessor's Office and various regulatory agencies. The calcu- lations are based on metered and historical data and estimates and were performed by staf' The fees are reasonable, directly related to costs and based upon average sewer use by property type. Users placing a heavy demand on the sewerage system, either by quantity or nature of discharge, are assessed a separate additional fee. "EE" AGENDA ITEM #32(a) - DISTRICT 6 "EE" ORDINANCE NO. 613 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 609 ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 612 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the District; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992; and, C. That the new sewer use fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Table A, as adopted by Section 2 of Ordinance No. 609, is hereby amended to read as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance. Section 2: This Ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1989. Section 3: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. "FF-1" AGENDA ITEM #32(b) - DISTRICT 6 "FF-1" + � s PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California -2_ �.✓ "FF-2" AGENDA ITEM #32(b) - DISTRICT 6 "FF-2" RESOLUTION NO. 89-63-6 ...i DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO COLLECT SEWER SERVICEON 1989-gO PR PERTY TAX BILLS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 613, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 612; and, WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such charges, as adopted by District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, its general taxes. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer service charges, as established by Ordinance No. 613, on the 1989-90 property tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this resolution remains `...� in effect; and, Section 2. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, "GG-1" AGENDA ITEM #32(d) - DISTRICT 6 "GG-l " this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by Ordinance No. 613, is changed; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order set forth in Section 1 herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. "GG-2" AGENDA ITEM #32(d) - DISTRICT o GG-2" ` • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS June 7, 1989 el ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ,OaM ELUE AVENUE County Sanitation District No. 11 ac.eo.e+ao fflUNraiN vaLLEr.CALIFORNIA 92)28.6+2) Supplemental sewer Service User Fee Report 111.1 acaaa+, Fiscal 1989-90 District No. 11 modified its long-range financial plan in 1987 to include a supplemental user fee for single family residences, multi-family residences and non-residential properties. The fee was and continues to be necessary to make up a shortfall in ad valorem tax revenues and to provide increased funding necessary for operations and maintenance as well as necessary modification and replacement of capital facilities. The proposed sewer use fee amounts are based upon financial studies and analysis by District staff as reflected in the 1989-90- budget recommendations by the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee for Joint Works Operating and Working Capital Funds which include increases in anticipated expenses to maintain and operate the joint treatment plants. Personnel related expenses are expected to increase as a result of newly authorized positions, filling currently authorized but unfilled positions and salary and wage adjustments provided in existing MOU' s with employee groups. Chemical expenses are expected to increase as new odor control facilities requiring chemical additions are placed into service and as more flow receives advanced primary or physical/chemical treatment. Increased solids handling and disposal costs are budgeted as landfill disposal costs are increased and as sludge reuse/disposal options become more costly because of regulatory requirements and increased production of sludge. New odor control facilities will also require additional use of utilities and those. expenses are budgeted to increase. Other general repair, maintenance and operating expenses are also budgeted to increase as a result of inflation, additional flow, regulatory requirements and increased complexity and age of the facilities. District No. 11 shares in these joint works operations and maintenance expenses on the basis of flow. Engineering estimates for 1989-90 indicate that the District's share of joint works operations and maintenance expenses will be $3,175,000. When the Individual District operations and maintenance expenses and dry period funding requirements are added and the other projected revenue sources are deducted, the aggregate amount of supplemental user fees required is calculated to be $1,851,000. Using the Orange County Assessor's Office report of residential units and non-residential building square feet, the Finance Department has calculated the following supplemental user fee data: Class Number Rate Amount Raised Single Family Residence 29,036 $40/unit $1,161,000 Multi-Family Residence 12,898 $24/unit 309,000 Non Residential 13,162,482 sq. ft. $29/1000 sq. ft. 381,000 Total 1 851,000 This report is based upon data received from all Departments of the County Sanitation Districts, the Orange County Assessor's Office and various regulatory agencies. The calcu- lations are based on metered and historical data and estimates and were performed by staff. The fees are reasonable, directly related to costs and based upon average sewer use by property type. Users placing a heavy demand on the sewerage system, either by quantity or nature of discharge, are assessed a separate additional fee. "HH" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 11 "HH" ORDINANCE NO. 1109 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1108 ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the District; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992; and, C. That the new sewer use fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Table A, as adopted by Section 2 of Ordinance No. 1108, is hereby amended to read as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance. Section 2: This Ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1989. Section 3: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. "II-1" AGENDA ITEM #35(b) - DISTRICT 11 `...� PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. a rman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California -2- "II-2" AGENDA ITEM #35(b) - DISTRICT 11 "II-2" o RESOLUTION NO. 89-65-11 l �� DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 1989-95 ERTY TAX BILL A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; and, WHEREAS, California Health 8 Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such charges, as adopted by District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax roll to the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, its general taxes. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to California Health 6 Safety Code Section 5473, the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer service charges, as established by Ordinance No. 1109, on the 1989-90 property tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this resolution remains in effect; and, Section 2. That pursuant to California Health 6 Safety Code Section 5473, this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed ""JJ-1" AGENDA ITEM #35(d) - DISTRICT 11 "JJ-1" .r' or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by �,..� Ordinance No. 1109, is changed; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order set forth in Section 1 herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. "JJ-2" AGENDA ITEM #35(d) - DISTRICT 11 "JJ-2" i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 11 2, 3, 59 61 71 112 13 AND 14 OF w ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MAY 10, 1989 P�ITAT1GN o C C J o N Slee. 19g 0 GE co ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 El T. AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA i ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on May 10, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chai man Orma Crank x Dan Griset, Chai man pro tem —Dan Young z Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula Kennedy x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: x A.B. -Buck" Catlin, Chairnan _Chris Norby x W1111am D. Mahoney, Chairman pro tem —HenryBeth Graham x Roland E. Bigonger _ W. Wades x Dan Griset _Dan Young x Ron Isles _Garrey Nelson z James Neal _George Scott a= Arthur G. Newton _Carol Downey z Bob Perry _Norman Culver x Iry Pickler _Fred Hunter x Wayne Silzel _James T. Fasbender x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera z Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Palls, Chairman Orbrey Duke z Garrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin x Edward L. Allen _Paul Verellen a Wes Bannister _John Erskine z A.B. -Buck- Catlin —BobChris Norby x Norman Culver _ Perry a Don R. Griffin Donna L. Chessen 7—Dan Griset _Dan Young x John Kanel x _ William D. Mahoney Beth Graham i 7—James Neal _George Scott x Iry Pickler _Fred Hunter x J.R. -Bob- Stefen _Dewey Wiles x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth x Charles Sylvia _Robert Wahistrom x Edna Wilson _Joe Hunt DISTRICT NO. 5: John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman x Evelyn Hart a Donald A. Strauss, Chai man pro tem Evelyn Hart x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wanner, Chairman _Harry Green x Ruthelyn Plummer. Chat moan pro teen Evelyn Hart x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman Fred Barrera x Rlcharo Edgar, Chairman pro tem —_Ursula Kennedy z Dan Griset —RogerDan Young x Don R. Roth _ Stanton x Sally Anne Sheridan _Larry Agran r° a Donald A. Strauss _John C. Cox, Jr. x James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tom Mays, Chairman _Jim Silva z Grace Winchell, Chairman pro tem Wes Bannister x Roger Stanton —Dan R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Medea, Chairman _Roland E. Sigonger x Iry Pickler, Chairman pro tem Fred Hunter z Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera _Wayne Wedin z Ron Isles \„,/ DISTRICT NO. 14: Peer A. Swan, Chairman x Darryl Miller 7—Ursula Kennedy, Chai man pro tem —Richard B. Edgar 7—Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton -7—Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran x Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera 2 05/10/89 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Bob Ooten, Rich von Langen, Chuck Winsor, Jack Vincent, Ray Young OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark Ide, Pervaiz Anwar, Jamel Demir, Conrad Hohener, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, Bill Fleming, Tom Mossinger, Gregory S. Keeler e t x t f • x x e e :t t x DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt from t e osta Mesa Sanitary That the minute excerpt from the Costa District Mesa Sanitary District re appointment of alternate Director, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: District Active Director Alternate Director i 6 James A. Wahner Harry S. Green DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1. It was then moved: That Director Robert Hanson be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled i and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hanson as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Dan Griset be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Griset as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman C airman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary - declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2. It was then moved: That Director A. B. "Buck" Catlin be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Catlin as Chairman. l I It was further moved: That Director William D. Mahoney be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Mahoney as Chairman pro tem. -3- 05/10/89 DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the j Boards of Directors, the Secretary �.J declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3. It was then moved: That Director Richard T. Polis be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was - polled and. the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Polis as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Carrey Nelson be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Nelson as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman hairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5. It was then moved: That Director John C. Cox, Jr. be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Cox as Chairman. _ It was further moved: That Director Donald A. Strauss be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Strauss as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which Annual elect on of Chal man and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6. i It was then moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chai man. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Ruthelyn Plummer be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Plummer as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7. ... 4 05/10/89 It was then moved: That Director Don E. Smith be nominated as a candidate for 111111I the office of Chai man. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Smith as Chairman. \ // It was further moved: That Director Richard B. Edgar be nominated as a candidatE for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Edgar as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary - declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11. It was then moved: That Director Tom Mays be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Mays as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Grace Winchell be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winchell as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 13 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13. It was then moved: That Director Henry W. Wedaa be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wedaa as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Iry Pickler be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Pickler as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 14 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman hairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14. It was then moved: That Director Peer A. Swan be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. Director Iry Pickler was also nominated but declined the nomination. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Swan as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Ursula E. Kennedy be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Kennedy as Chairman pro tem. -5- 05/10/89 I DISTRICT 5 In the absence of Chairman John C. Cox, Appointment of Chairman pro tem Jr. and Chairman pro tem Donald ! A. Strauss, Director Evelyn Hart was appointed Chairman pro tem of District No. S. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported on the Repor o t e Joint Chairman Directors' orientation and plant tour conducted by staff the previous week which was structured specifically for the newer Directors. It included a review of the Districts' , Boards' and staff organizational structures and their various activities. Staff also presented an overview of the various environmental and public health programs, personnel matters, and financing and budget procedures of the Districts. Chairman Smith indicated very favorable comments had been received from the 14 Directors that attended the orientation and tour. The Joint Chairman then noted that the Board had previously been sent a memorandum from Director Hank Wedaa with regard to the Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the Air 8 Waste Management Association to be held in Anaheim on June 25 through 30. Mr. Smith commented that this conference would provide a good opportunity for the Directors to learn about evolving air quality issues that will affect the Districts, their cities, the County and virtually everyone. Accordingly, Directors would be reimbursed for the registration cost if they wished to attend. Director Bob Siefen, who is also Vice Chairman of the Solid Waste Management Commission, then briefly addressed the Board relative to the proposed revised County Solid Waste Plan. He advised that the Commission had just spent 14 months revising the plan which was recently forwarded for approval by the Directors' respective cities. ye urged Directors to support and help get the proposed plan approved. He noted that they must receive 51% approval before it may be submitted to the State. If they don't receive the necessary approval , it will return to the Commission for further revisions and the process would then have to begin all over again. Chairman Smith then noted that the joint Boards would be adjourning that evening to Wednesday, May 17th, at 7:30 p.m. , at the Garden Grove Community Center, for a i public hearing on the "Action Plan" Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. He also reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, May 18th, at 5:30 p.m. The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, May 24th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Charles Sylvia and Wayne Wedin to attend and participate in the discussions. Chairman Smith also noted that Districts Nos. 5 and 6 would be adjourning to Wednesday, May 31st, District 1 to Thursday, June 1st, and District 11 to Wednesday, June 7th, to consider modifications to their supplemental user fee programs for 1989-90. Chairman Smith advised Directors that nominations for the annual election of Joint Chairman would be accepted at the June Board meeting, with election at the July meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman will be at the regular July meeting. ... -6- 05/10/89 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Smith reported that at Recognl on of Industrial Discharger, its annual conference in April , the Aluminum Precision Products for California Water Pollution Control / receiving PCA award of for Association (CWPCA) had presented an award of excellence to Aluminum Precision Products, an Orange County firm that discharges under permit into the Districts' sewage system. The purpose of the award is to stimulate interest on the part of industry to take positive steps to meet strict water pollution control standards. This firm, nominated by the Districts' Industrial Waste Division inspectors,, was recognized for their efforts over the past year to comply with discharge requirements and foster an awareness in the business community for the need to control industrial wastewater to help protect public health and the environment. The Joint Chairman then recognized Mr. Greg Keeler, Manufacturing Manager of Aluminum Precision Products. Chairman Smith then presented the award of excellence to Mr. Keeler, recognizing their efforts over the past year to comply with the Districts' discharge requirements. On behalf of the Boards of Directors, Chairman Smith commended the firm and expressed the Boards' appreciation for their efforts. Mr. Keeler thanked the Boards for the recognition. He noted that his firm had worked very hard and invested a lot of money and effort in their treatment system In order to comply with the Districts' requirements. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented further on Repor of the General Manager the new Directors' orientation/plant tour held on May 3rd. He advised Directors that may have been unable to attend, but still wished to tour the plants, to contact staff and they would be happy to arrange a tour at the Directors' convenience. Mr. Sylvester then briefly commented on the public hearing on the "Action Plan" Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan scheduled for May 17th. The purpose of the meeting is to hear public comments on the EIR which is part of the Districts' 30-year "Action Plan". Fallowing the hearing, the Boards will direct staff and consultants to take both written and oral comments into account and respond to them in the Final Program EIR which will be presented to the Boards for their consideration at an adjourned Joint meeting on July 19th. At that meeting the Boards will also make a determination on the appropriate wastewater management program for the Districts and the terms of application to the Environmental Protection Agency and California Regional Water Quality Control Board for renewal of the Districts' NPDES ocean discharge permit for the next five-year period. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that staff Report of the ueneral counsel and he had been working on a new Industrial Waste Ordinance for the Districts for over a year. A draft of the document was reviewed by the Executive Committee at their April meeting. He then commented on the proposed ordinance which will be submitted to the Boards for first reading in the near future. -7- 05/10/89 Mr. Woodruff also reported on the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' Conference in New York the previous week, which he attended along with the General Manager. He advised that Mr. Jim Elder, the key person heading up EPA' s Division of Enforcement, addressed AMSA's Legal Affairs Committee. His message was very clear that EPA is serious about enforcement of their pretreatment program requirements. Their initial enforcement program is currently underway. EPA can take enforcement actions against industries even if the local POTW (publicly-awned treatment works) has not taken any action. They have indicated that they will be tough on both industries and POTW's. On August 31st the Environmental Protection Agency, by national press release, will itemize every company or POTW upon which they will be assessing monetary fines, or filing Judicial actions because of noncompliance with their pretreatment program. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered i that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 12, 1989, nor the adjourned regular meeting held April 27, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments �✓ Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -8- 05/10/89 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ra ification of a ent of Joint and Individual District taims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, l f and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. `..� 4/12/89 4/26/89 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 562,165.34 $1,189,096.87 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,206,902.25 255,754.16 Joint Working Capital Fund - 129,639.99 246,122.13 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 101,989.95 7,937.36 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 3.50 -0- DI TRAIL N7�L0. - 1,726.88 111,434.47 DI RICT N0. - 9,805.51 49,835.79 DI TRICT NO. 5 - 82,502.51 6,512.22 DI TR-3 ICT N0. 6 - -0- 292.87 DIDI TRH. 77 - 77,991.25 54,863.98 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 183.26 7,920.31 DI TROT-NO. - -O- -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 _ 1,137.50 948.19 DISTRICT N 5 & 6 JOINT 29,209.25 7,657.31 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,816.56 32.74 DISTRICTS NO5. 7 & 14 JOINT - 428.42 3,470.41 3,2 6,5 2.17 1,942,678.81 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Safety Breathing Res iratory Systems, That the bid tabulation and ec fication N2. E-1 7 to Pacific recommendation re award of Purchase of Safety quipment ompany Safety Breathing Respiratory Systems, Specification No. E-187, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Pacific Safety Equipment Company for the total amount of $81,431.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing s aff to issue a purchase order contract to That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Munici a1 Industrial Sates Com an to negotiate and issue a purchase order for purchase of zierpentix Conveyor contract to Municipal Industrial Sales Re lacement Parts and Materials Company in an amount not to exceed - Specif cation No. -188 $41,500.00, plus sales tax and shipping charges, for purchase of Serpentix Conveyor Replacement Parts and Materials (Specification No. E-188). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff t0 issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, No. 38045 issued to Sierra Copy authorizied to issue Change Order No. 1 for printing "Action Plan" Draft to Purchase Order No. 38045 issued to EIR Sierra Copy for additional printing services required to print "Action Plan" Draft EIR on Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, increasing the total authorized amount from $3,995.00 to $4,386.54, including tax and shipping charges. -9- 05/10/89 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin an a rder No. 7 o he ions and s ecif cations for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans and jJob NO. J-7-4 specifications for Administration �..✓ Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $22,409.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for modification of ten free-standing pilasters, additional framing of the walls and roof of the second floor, additional tresses under second floor, rerouting of 22-inch HVAC duct and Chiller Building drain, additional posts to stiffen curtain and window walls and for a 20-year bond to guarantee the roof against leaks, be, and is hereby, approved. • ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change [ der No. 15 o the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 15 to the plans • Job No. J-15 and specifications for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, authorizing an addition of $5,376.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for upgrading existing circuit transformers in the 12 kv Service Center and additional safety handrailing at the Booster Station, be, and Is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and Job No. J-15A specifications for Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A, authorizing an addition of $3,990.00 to the contract with General Electric Company for fabrication and installation of vibration monitors as a safety measure for protection of the five 2600 hp electric pump motors, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to e plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. J-16 specifications for Lighting Conservation Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-16, authorizing a net addition of $43,398.00 to the contract with Pacific Electric, Inc. for eight items of miscellaneous modifications and additional work; granting a time extension of 48 calendar days for completion of said additional work; and assessment of liquidated damages for late completion of the project, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. J-15 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-42, accepting Lighting Conservation Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-16, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. \� -10- 05/10/89 i ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Chan a Order No. 17 to he plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 17 to the plans Job NOS. P1-20 and P1-31 and specifications for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleancuts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of j $36,864.59 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for construction of a containment wall at the foul air/chemical area; modifications to HVAC circuit in Power Building 3A and frame and cover at Sunflower Pump Station; installation of concrete beam at Tunnel No. 1; installation of nine conduits across roadway; modification of the type of concrete block required; and removal of an undisclosed concrete structure, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change rder No. 1 to the plans antl specifications for That Change Order No. 12 to the plans Job Nos. FI-25, PS-26 P2-31 and specifications for Covers for PZ-JJ and P -34 Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A" Job No. P2-34, authorizing a net addition of $72,969.50 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for modifications to foul air ducting, the addition of tunnel covers and stairs for added safety, and deletion of aluminum covers, walks and railings over Distribution Boxes "A", "B" and "Cu to be completed under a separate project in the future, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the tans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and ob No. P1-27 specifications for Entrances, Site and Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-27, authorizing a net deduction of $15,791.20 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for substitution of road surface material , utility modifications and undisclosed obstructions, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Rea ection of bitls for Specification Nos. R-033-i R-033-2 and Job No. P -40 and authorizing General Manager to combine work with upcoming projects Receive and file letter from Moved, seconded and duly carried: Fleming Engineering, Inc. That the letter from Fleming Engineering, Inc. dated April 24, 1989, requesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid for Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-033-1; Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-033-2; and Instrumentation Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-40, due to a mathematical error, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -11- 05/10/89 Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried: emorandum That the General Counsel 's Memorandum dated May 2, 1989, regarding rejection of bids for Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-033-1; Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-033-2; and Instrumentation Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-40, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. I A rovin re nest of Flemin Moved, seconded and duly carried: n neerin Inc. far wi drawal ' of their bid That the request of Fleming Engineering, Inc. for withdrawal of their bid for Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-033-1; Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-033-2; and Instrumentation Improvements at Plant No. 2, Jab No. P2-40, be, and is hereby approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid bond submitted in connection with said bid be, and is hereby, exonerated. Rejecting all bids and authorizing Moved, seconded and duly carried: eneral Manager to combine work with upcoming projects That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-43, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation; rejecting all bids for Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-033-1; Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-033-2; and Instrumentation Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-40; and authorizing the General Manager to combine said work with similar upcoming projects to be bid in the future. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby withUr—ban Alternatives re adopt Resolution No. 89-44, approving Districts' Community Outreach Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Program Services Agreement with Urban Alternatives for public participation consulting services required in connection with the Districts' Community Outreach Program, providing for a reallocation of the costs for said services among the various categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $170,544.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee o_ negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services reent hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum with Brown antl al welAme onsulting No. 4 to the Professional Services Engineers re Job No. J-19 Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, to provide for design of a steam turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of engine heat to produce additional electricity. -12- 05/10/89 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell That the Selection Committee Consulting Engineers for planning, certification of the final negotiated design and construction services re fee relative to the Professional Jobs Nos. J-11-1 J-2 J-27 Services Agreement with Brown and P2-2 -5-1 P2-35-2 P2-35-3 Caldwell Consulting Engineers for PZ-J5-4 and P - 5-5 planning, design and construction services In connection with master-planned support facilities at Plants 1 and 2, to include the fallowing, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved: ° Rehabilitation and Conversion of Existing Laboratoryat Plant No. 1 to Office Space, Job No. J-11-1 ° Personnel Building at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-26 ° Demolition and Removal of Abandoned Structures at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-27 ° Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Jab No. P2-23-5-1 ° Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-2 ° Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3 ° Construction Management Office at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-4 ° Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-45, approving said agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a maximum amount not to exceed $865,000.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a j part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of Thomas J. Mendez That the claim of Thomas J. Mendez dated April 10, 1989, in the amount of $626.79 plus tax for damage to his motorcycle allegedly caused by excess sand and gravel at stop sign by grit chamber at Plant 1, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts, General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. -13- 05/10/89 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve wri en report of the Executive committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on April 26, 1989, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Executive Committee to approve a reements for services That the Executive Committee be, and is and acquisition of air emission hereby, authorized to approve, for credits to comply with S AQMD execution by the General Manager, requirements for the proposed agreements for specialized professional 0 m9d primary treatment expansion consulting services; testing and of Reclamation Plant No. 1 analytical services; procurement of materials, equipment and services for Installation and operation of facilities for pilot scale testing; and acquisition of air emission credits pursuant to new source review regulations, to comply with SCAQMD requirements for the proposed 60 mgd primary treatment expansion of Reclamation Plant No. 1. ALL DISTRICTS Ac ions re im lementation of Emp oyee ommuter Program required by SCAQMD Rule 1bu3 Authorizing the General Mana er to Moved, seconded and duty carried: file the proposed Employee omnuter Program with SCAQMD, and to That the General Manager be, and is im lament said grogram upon hereby, authorized to file the approya by AQMD proposed Employee Commuter Program with SCAQMD, and to implement said program, subject to approval by SCAQMD and approval by the Boards of Directors of recommended vanpooling and fleet vehicle conversion to clean-burn fuel program elements. Authorizing staff and General Moved, seconded and duly carried: Counsel to investigate alternatives on the vanpooling program element That the staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to investigate alternatives, including potential liability exposure, and submit a recommendation for consideration by the Boards of Directors on the vanpooling program element. Authorizing staff to investigate Moved, seconded and duly carried: alternat ves on the conversion of fleet vehicles to clean-burn fuel That staff be, and is hereby, program element authorized to investigate alternatives and submit a recommendation for consideration by the Boards of Directors on the conversion of fleet vehicles to clean-burn fuel program element. . r -14- 05/10/89 Tabling consideration Of Dayment One element of the staff's proposed for bus passes for employees_ using Employee Commuter Program to comply i ublic transportation to commute to with SCAQMD Rule 1503 includes an work as part of Districts' Employee incentive for employees to ride publi,..,/ Commuter Program re compliance with transportation to work by offering to SCAQMD Rule 1503 reimburse the monthly cost up to $28 for bus passes. ' Directors inquired as to whether computer information would be available prior to authorizing payment for the bus passes to determine if there would be a significant number of new riders or if only existing bus riders would benefit. Staff reported that in June 1988 an employee commuter survey was conducted with the assistance of the Orange County Transit District which indicated there were only eight potential employees that could use the public transportation system. At the present time, one employee uses the bus on a i part-time basis. Directors also discussed the possibility of charging employees for parking spaces to encourage car pooling or the use of the public transportation system. The General Counsel pointed out that such a proposal would probably be subject to the meet-and-confer process. It was then moved and seconded: That purchase of bus passes or reimbursement of cost for up to $28 per month for employees using this form of public transportation to commute to work be authorized as part of the Districts' Employee Commuter Program for complying with SCAQMD's Rule 1503. Following further discussion during which several Directors indicated their opposition to the motion authorizing purchase of bus passes for employees, a substitute motion was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That consideration of a motion authorizing purchase of bus passes or reimbursement of cost for up to $28 per month for employees using this form of public transportation to commute to work as part of the Districts' Employee Commuter Program for complying with SCAQMD Rule 1503, be, and is hereby, tabled. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Waste Minimization Pro ram to be incor orated into That the Waste Minimization Program, revised .W. r inance outlined in the Staff Report dated April 20, 1989, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to incorporate its provisions into the revised Industrial Waste Ordinance now under preparation. _ ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Pentlin lassification and om ensation ResolulEion No. 9- 0 That the Boards of Directors hereby as amended, establishing a 1989 adopt Resolution No. 89-46, Amending Summer Work Program Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1989 Summer Work Program for painting and grounds maintenance wor� A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -15- 05/10/89 i ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Final upplement No. 2 to Joint Treatment Works Wastewater �J Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Verbal staff report The Districts' Director of Engineering reported that the action before the Boards was to approve the Final Supplement No. 2 to the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report which addresses the impact of constructing the two additional digesters included in Job No. P1-34-1, Digesters Nos. 11 - 16 and Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1. He advised that two comments were received after the close of the public comment period from State agencies; however, their comments did not directly relate to the project. They addressed the development of a sludge management program and SCAQMD air quality management plan conformity issues. Mr. Dawes noted that this project is contingent upon approval by the South Coast Air Quality Management District; therefore, that issue has been addressed. Receive and file Staff Report and Moved, seconded and duly carried: umnary That the Staff Report and Summary dated May 1, 1989, re Final Supplement No. 2 to Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly carried: received after the public hearing That the following written comments received after the public hearing on April 12, 1989, be, and are hereby, received and filed: Comments Received From Dated California Regional Water Quality Control Board April 17, 1989 State of California, Office of Planning and Research April 24, 1989 State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Loans and Grants April 18, 1989 Receive, file and approve Final Moved, seconded and duly carried: Supplement No. 2 t0 Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan That the Final Supplement No. 2 to Environmental Impact Report Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby certify that said Final Supplement No. 2 to Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the State and Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. -16- 05/10/89 j Certifying Final Supplement No. 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: to the Joint Treatment orks Waste- water Master Plan Environmental That the Boards of Directors hereby Impact Report adopt Resolution No. 89-47, certifying Final Supplement No. 2 to the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report; making certain findings in connection therewith; adopting a statement of overriding considerations; and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination re said project. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment - That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17, 1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the lams and s eclfications for That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and Contract No. -14R specifications for Santa Ana River Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 2-14R, transmitting minor revisions to the plans, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awar n ontract No. -14R to ancon Engineering, Inc. That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 89-48-2. receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Santa Ana River Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 2-14R, to Sancon Engineering, Inc. in the total amount of $312,550.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive file and deny claim of raig R. and Darralyn A. larke re That the claim of Craig R. and Darralyn Contract No. 2-26 A. Clarke dated April 11, 1989, in the amounts of $1,500,000 and $150,000, respectively, for general damages, plus medical damages and lost earnings in undetermined amounts, allegedly resulting from an industrial accident in connection with construction of Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-26, which was awarded and is being administered by the City of Anaheim, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the District's General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and the City of Anaheim for appropriate action. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17,�.) 1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989. -17- 05/10/89 1 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 7 to the ! - lams and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans and Con ract No. 5- 9 specifications for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29, authorizing an addition of $84,274.00 to the j contract with W. H. Ebert Corporation for additional work due to undisclosed utilities and obstructions, and for alignment adjustments, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans and ontract N0. 5-29 specifications for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29, authorizing an addition of $119,854.00 to the i contract with W. H. Ebert Corporation for additional work to realign a City of Newport Beach water line due to undisclosed utilities and obstructions, and granting a time extension of 29 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 9 to the lams and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 9 to the plans and ontract No. 5-29 specifications for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Farce Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29, authorizing adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net deduction of $6,804.00 from the contract with W. H. Ebert Corporation, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 5-29 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-49, accepting Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17, 1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grave, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Atl ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17, 1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then `.✓ declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989. -18- 05/10/89 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation re proposed Annexation_ That the request from Mr. and No. ITT - Nowling Annexation Mrs. Richard Nowling for annexation of / 1.17 acres to the District located in �.../ the vicinity of Orange Park Boulevard and Amapola Avenue in unincorporated County territory, be, and 1s hereby, received, ordered filed and referred to staff for study and recommendation (proposed Annexation No. 131 - Nowling Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17, 1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17, 1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17, 1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Roam A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: djournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17, 1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10. 1989. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to issue purchase order to Wilson's That the General Manager be, and is Equipment Rentals, Inc. for hereby, authorized to issue a purchase Contract No. 3-21-1R1 order to Wilson's Equipment Rentals, Inc. in the amount of $32,655.39 for Trench Repair, Westside Relief Interceptor, Contract No. 3-21-1R1. 19 �`/ 05/10/89 DISTRICT 3 Public Hearing re proposed - Ordinance No. 310 Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:23 p.m. Close Public Hearing There being no public oral comments, the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:24 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. J1U That proposed Ordinance No. 310, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 306 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities and Repealing Ordinance No. 308, be read by title only; and, I FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 310 by title only. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. JIU following roll call vote: AYES: Richard T. Polis, Chairman, Edward L. Allen, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Norman E. Culver, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, John Kanel , William D. Mahoney, i James Neal , Carrey Nelson, Iry Pickler, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Edna Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: Wes Bannister That Ordinance No. 310, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 306 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities and Repealing Ordinance No. 308, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 3 ctions relative to continuation o appeal of Beatrice Hunt-Wesson Foods re Industrial Waste Permit No. 3-1-143 to June 14, 1989 i Receive and file letter of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson That the letter of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson Foods dated April 14, 1989, re continuation of appeal hearing re Industrial Waste Permit No. 3-1-143 from May 10, 1989 to June 14, 1989, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. I -20- 05/10/89 i Receive file and a rove General Moved, seconded and duly carried: ounsel s emorandum and letter i That the General Counsel ' s Memorandum dated April 17, 1989, and letter dated April 17, 1989, to Joel S. Moskowitz, Esq. re continuation of appeal hearing re Industrial Waste Permit No. 3-1-143 from May 10, 1989 to June 14, 1989, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Author izin continuation of appeal Moved, seconded and duly carried: of Beatrice un -Wesson Foods to June 14, 1989 That the appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson Foods be, and is hereby, continued to June 14, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , in the District's Administrative Office, or as soon thereafter as it may be heard. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17, 1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:26 p.m. , May 10, 1989. 5ecre ary, boarasuof Directors i County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -21- FUND NO 9199 . JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/05169 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGE CDUN IT CLAIM 0110 24112109POSTING DATE W 12 B9 -i WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT A DESCRIPTION 09F886 AGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 58.204.4E ENGINEHRING SERVICES DIST 5 09Fb87 ANC INCORPORATED $427.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 09l P8B ACME WELpI MI 53.985.60 TRAILER MAIM 098889 ADAMSON UNIFOPM L EGUIP. $97.35 SAVER SUPPLIES ' 09PR90 ROY A NCO CON37_DICTCTORB. INC. 575.451.95 CONSTRUCTION 7-10-1 E9R891 ALL AMERICAN ASFHALT 531.27 ASPHALT 0986T2 ALLEN ELECTRIC CO. $9.835.30 PLOW INDICATOR .op oq} _AL IEO C RONICS $109.06 INSTRUMENT PARS P 9P894 1MER CAN TECHNICAL BUFFET $1.719.11 - --- --_- - UPPIC6 SUPPLIES ----- 098F95 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $2.314.19 MECHANICAL PARTS _ r9 FE96 BLAKE P. ANOEFSON $121 50 __ T BANG BUYING MUSE C 9P E97 ANGELUS PACIFIC CO. $143.10 PERNPERS 092096 ANTHOMV.S MECH. L MACHINE, INC 5800.19 MECHANICAL PARTS PCRP99 gPDY iRNs,Y ARDlES A FODPPPFNT 31.151.1E _, ____._._ .. TOOLS 098900 RALPH W. ATKINSON 5127.91 PUMP PARTS - R9P901 ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY $29.00 SUBSCRIPTION _ Fn r5R9R2_._AD0la-MEO.RECOPTING 9EP.VICE saa,at - _ _ VIDEO TAPES X I9E96T AUTO WEIGHUTRO CO. $576.47 INSTRUMENT PART = GgPggs RRl INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, .733.44 PLAQUES- 09P905 9C ISAFETRI AL ST R 4 __ _ SAFETY PARTS _ .a0.•W 09P906 BAN SAFETY L GALLERY $190.62 FRAMES SOPPLI88 P98907 BACKSTREET GALLERY $190.82 PUBLIC P9f90R BAN e0 i- THEY CO. 51$9.55 PUBLICATION 1 b9P9V9 PAN. OF APF9I CA-C.ASOC. 59.55 CONSTRUCTIONCSERV ` 1 09F911 P.W. RAR0T71 AND ASSOC. i5.2P0.0 C. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-25626,P2-32,33.34,37 _ -_ 1--• rgrgtt _ TRUCK PARTS C98912 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS S3082.66 LAB SUPPLIES -` IS8913 BEACON BAT ENTERPRISES. INC. 5657.90 CAR WASHES , ' n9R91a -_RDPFRT Rrm.MIn uN Fo n9♦ a eA AT,nl_T> __ . .. _.._ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-31,32,33,34.29 09P915 BENT ENGINEER INS. INC. $69.19 NLCPANICAL PARTS - v98916 BIDCTCLE 355.9I SUBSCRIPTION 91Y _ FnTIF EA. _. _—_--_ORRICE SUPPLIES 19P91B MARILYN BOOTH 5539.23 MUTING EXPENSE '- 0Ppg19 RALPH BOYER $62.30 REGISTRATION "P892i1— ._IREMLMyFTFEx FR a ASSIIC.�ENC- A4A_tA _._ _. .__. . NBCRANIr•• PARTS _ ___ P9F521 9RITPI"EE ELECTRIC 511.280.i7 PUNP PARTS f 5f a2i PRGOKS PRODUCTS iB.130.E0 VAULTS ^Bi 925 8 'NiCALJ'Pr, APsn_-• P9E92s B"OUR L CALDWELL CONSULTING $61.402.46 BWGINEERING SCBVIC85 P2-37.79.P1-35.3-19 „ 09E92F BUENA PAR LU MEER L HARDWARE $21.-49 BUILDING MATERIALS u. __rgarnr — yr _ .9..TA_g.___._ .. POBLIEATIO N79 AP Tv TRRI ALS 9E927 VUSIN O. INC. f2 .V EPIC¢ SUPPLIES 09P9 G. STREED SBN4.q} BETTY CASH EEIMBURS@ffH -4 r -L e rn _____ --- _ QA IfAIPAM 09P930 CST-CALTROL 577.2E METER EEIR 09E931 C.Y.G.CJ. f1.5439O CONFERENCE RECISTPARON FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/05/89 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 04/12/89 POSTING DATE 04/12/89 -�-YeGGeYT Yn-___ __�yENnne pMll nrt _�IIFSrR 1GT1nY 09F932 CAL-CMEM SALES 5201.64 HARDWARE .9141- ft .r-I LSR ' 098934 CALLY CURTIS CO. f80.98 VIDEO 1. ne0e35 CAPITAL WESTWARD 5828.80 ABCHANICAL PARTS ee. FTnY_ENcrYrrRA -leY-ca _ - _ _ _ EHGIFH;¢glyG.-$gBEinn_9_v_A0101 1-0937 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $1.627.76 PHONE EQUIPMENT C9N9SE CENTURY SAFETY JUST. 6 SUFF. $1.378.16 SAPRTY SUPPLIES Kea - ru FNWEST pxn clopre-]ur_ •v.eea-�c__ ,_-_, - _-_ RTC, rmnomv w n .L_O9-8R ". 098R40 CMESSELL CORP. $295.79 CHARTS 09P!41 A.Y. CHESTER70K CO. f1.5111.27 PUMP TESTING ' •RN-CONSYWSON S n 121.50 5 -.-.— - ENSE ZL 0-6-44 COAST T CLA YSON f21.5C OFFIIEGTETPSNRA 0!E!s4 COAST TECH COMPUTERS f2.522.0P OFFICE BQEIPI�MT - "' 09P946 COMPRESSOR COMPONENi3 OF CALIF $549.67 COMPUTER 09 P.947 COMPUTER DA TA CON i589.67 COMPUTER PARTS .. LONNEL4JLN.ILRIS A OJ"- _ u._ca _.__.- _-_ __-ELECTRICRSU --__ 396949 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL OI ST. f1 3113.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES '2 r98950 CONSOLIDATED 4EVR OE ApFNIC3 .... .. BLUEPRINTING LGS TAIL' •256 •4 ---------. CLALB 098952 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY f25R.95 ENGINE C M.D. 5-13- - ;.j-I 09E953 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES 31.—4903.28 ENGINE O. 5-13-07 J-13A 09P954 BOP-E. COULTER;O-.SNP PREN $925.7.-- FIND? -y C9E955 R. E. COULTER CRANE ELECTRIC 5915.75 P@B PARTS a,l 99P954 COUNTY WHOLESALE EL ECTPiC f365.39_ O.ECTRIC PARTS N- 096958 ---CALAWATER -EAOWL-FY�O. i888.9O-___ .-..- . StUrraARTS __•: 098959 STATE WATER f00.T4 APPLIC EQUIAPPLICATION mEtTir FEE 990959 STATE OF CA HIGHWAY PATROL $40O.CO APPL[C-MATS P8¢ .. .- �.-0...-- _ .,a� R;•IENT--0E-6ENGP#L-REAVICFR •^^ "_ _ -___ . . .__ __. SAYBFK-MAiBRIALR P!P961 CIATEC POLYMERS f4.950.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES tl.0.8-10-0R v. C 9P9E2 OIFIL iF PO ASSOCIATES -2 31.6.76 ORRICE SIRPLIES ..- 098DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. iNF. — S5.SE6.g4._.._ _FLANT MAINTENANCE 6 _ 090964 DUNAD0 BRADSTREEF3. INC. 35.605.Dr PLANT NA"GISCRC¢ 6 eRPAIA O SE 9b5 DUNN 8 BAAOSTREET f300.04 SQIltlAR 6ECISteATION - &9F966--._-_— OL PONTCO., SAFETY •192 5P-- _..--BOOKS OPPLF6R O 9f 967 DL' PNT CO. CO.SAFETY SERVICES f192.39 30E83 ,. 996960 SIVSLS SALES CO. f68.46 YITf[NGS b96970 EAGLE ENTERPRISE. H61..i - ------HARDWARE �P8PAIA- - f!8971 EAGLE ENTERPRISES $551:2.87 OFFICES •� r9S971 E45 THAN. INC.T f172.87 ENGINE SUPPLIES -.--.969i2--_--- --rmEpsoh INDUSTGF.-.IP._ .____ ._- 971.0(--_._____ .._- _.�16[N¢BRING-b8RVF6E6-DIGT-2614--.__.__. E 9E973 FME P.SDO IMOUS TPIRL CONTROLS 3}.973.62 DRIVE UNITS f9P974 ENCHANTER. INC. f4.200.9n OCEAMOGWHIC SERVICES M.O.M.0.6-10-87 • EEERIEG-68R9[GEb-X86 098976 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. f260.00 LAB 07-i58--- ------ --=-F9i! —ENO NEE#-I-N" iEWOE-- PE -ENGINEERING SERVICES ' 09F577 JOMN P. iALNENSTF IN F.C. f3.S3B.40 CONTkUCTION SERVICES J-7-4 6 3-20 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9105/B9 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY a CLAIMS PAID 09 12 69 POSTING DATE 04/22/89 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT I DESCRIPTION .` li 09P970 FEDERAL ENVELOPEY f ORRICE SUPPLIES 9 EXPRESS CORP. $62,50 K1H FARIGHT I 099 FILTER SUPPLYCO. f198.09 MECHANICALS PART 096901 B1 FISCNER i PORTER CO. s6.1T2.09 LAS SINATION PARTS FTEHER SE 1'I SUPFLIES 09898 FLY SYSTEMS. INC. 6.0 JLLITOR SUPPLIES 098984 O-S STE TEMP $15.46 PUMP PARTS GELBER S PUMPS, INC, $365,60 990956 FLUKE TECHNICAL CENTER.. 2257.63 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 1' 096987 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $8.297.09 BUILDING PERMIT6989en FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 6200,'0 'rl 09E9B9 DONALD L. FOX i ASSOCIATES f1.825.00 SAFM CONSULTING u. C98990 NAG SYSTEMS / FOXBORO 6117.95 INSTRUMENT n998tl99992e BiE6Nx R AGDFx.I Il Nu C. f958.92 IMMINENT HPA IB C98993 6EOR6E LEECH ASSOCIATES i80122 ELECTRIC PUTS E235 nR lixG BYVRNRR - MY AD 09E995 GIIILICH-MITCHELL. INC. f3.63C.48 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 09P996 OON GREEK L ASSOCIATES 53.903.7! ENGINEERING SERVICES 88-72 Ib 098998 HARBOUR ENGINEERING S50B2.72 MECHANICAL PARTS Iy l� 09PS99 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $170.01 PUMP Pan 'y ° xncwex7EAT. PARTa 69-001 S. A. MEALY CO. S252.213.22 CONSTRUCTION PI-23R �IW 09-0O2 HERPAN-PHINNEY•KODMUR $1.901.73 PUMP PARTS Im Y h•1 FT7 oeE Keon nwwmw xecwmR P'� 099009 HOEMBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. A INC. i1.263.11 COMPRESOR PARTS " a. 099P05 MOUSE OF BATTERIES s699.60 BATTERIES n •-n- Y ! f,._, .Y!_ 1 .1.A-11 _wG a11ww1Tan �. i 09w007 CITY OF aHUNTINGTON PEACH $17.60 WATER USEAGE 099^"9B HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP 693.55 RUBBER STAMPS H M bed 099010 HURLEY ELECTRONICS. INC. $9.44 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES C99021 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,135.96 CONNECEORS �a 099P13 INGRAM PAPER $1,693.35 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1'99E19 INSTITUTE FOR ROW. TECH. f1.580.10 VIDEOS lu 099CIS IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 19900 WATER USAGE •° P99017 CHARLES A. JAM 5260.98 MEETING MUSE - TRAINING pr P 99CI9 JOE•S SWEEPING'SERVICE $1.316.:0 STREET SWEEPING w' 099n2C JOHNSTONE SUPPLY f97.24 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ar ur w.009. .._._..._. . aYC w. 114_,l. P 'T.C. W 099122 KEENAN SUPPLY $156.56 MECHANICAL PASTS y� I , 099223 THE NE17H COMPANIES 614.225.5D ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35636 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/05189 PAGE 4 J REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 04/12/89 POSTING DATE 04/12/89 P99024 KING BEARING. INC. $10.880.67 MECHANICAL PARTS US 099026 MARTIN KOROICK. SR f2.771.00 WESTBOCTION SERVICES 5-29631 099027 KRONNE AMERICA. INC. $1.193.64 INSTRUMENT 8— PARTS I° 099929 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS f431.04 CHLORINATION PARTS 09903E LEE S RO CONSULTING ENDR. $25.786.10 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33 BILL SSO 111112 LEVIS PUBLISNERSa INC. f63.85 PUBLICATION 099053 LILLY TYPESETTING f127.20 PRINTING Iu .ucran.mue 499035 M.P. LINDSTROM. INC. $13.602.85 CONSULTING SERVICES — MASTER PLAN 099036 LBRAIN PRODUCTS f1.47.3.80 RELIANCE POWER SERVICE AGREEMENT � 1° a 099038 MDS f52.98 INSTRUMENT PART L`99C39 MPS f24.49 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES P99541 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. 5951.39 EFILM NGINE N"DC D99042 MALT OLM PIRNIE r INC.INC 511.938.01 ENGINEERING S¢BVIC¢S PI-25.26.P2-32,13,34 iv .0 - R F SP TTVC 099044 ANUFA . OFFICE SUPPLIES 0099P45 HATT CHEDR. INC. 4262.57 C® BNATION ?ARTS A8T3 9^896 PCCBT SWEET ETA WORKS lI�aaY tL66.82 -- --PAST PARTS Iu!n 0998N MCNINLEY EQUIPMENT CORE 3266.82 CART PUTS Ir �aa! I 099UAR MCR AS TER—CARR SUPPLY CO. 596.53 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES49 'a• 09995C MICROAGE COMPUTER $16,505.26 COMPUTER/SOFTWARH Taal .99C51 MICROWAVE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS S204.74 ANTENNA — ..•'2----�IBRHN—GRMIJr{B ING i% 394 S6 ----- --FRIIGK PABF6 C99^53 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $8,220.23 NBCLINICAL PARTS Na 699 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. S1.550.00 VACUUM SERVICE Nn 099356 NEAL SUPPLY CO. f2S9.90 PIPE FITTINGS 099057 NEWARK ELECTRONICS f5.096.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS 9060 NUM -- —ME6BR91{GAL SARF ,j 09• 59 O fi335020.6O0 TRAH REMOVAL w DESSA BABBITT BEARING CO. 9 ENGINE PUTS099660 O ^. �. 099062 THE OHMART.CORP• f123.46 CABLE --h N.I P99P63 BIT" C CHEMICAL CO. S28 a033.62 CHLORINE N.O. 10-12-68 h°I 099165 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY f711.17 ELECIBIC SUPPLIES µ: h.� C99566 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. S224.76 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS t 099068 ORANGE VALVE S FITTING CO. $382.42 TIMINGS At ���� "99069 OSCAR-$ LOCK S SAFE S225.66 SECURITY d LOCHS M. FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/05/89 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 4 12189 POSTING DATE 04/12/89 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 0 DESCRIPTION Is� 09907E OXYGEN SERVICE $485.96 SPECIALTY CASES COUNTY f RANGE f 4 .45 DISPOSAL GATT PEN 0990T2 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS S100.000.00 PRBIRUN ADVANCE 099073 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $1,909.95 REMORSE NOG®e C01@ INgO m SIGN) p 99074 PACs CC" SYSTEMS S19 06 ROMANS w 099075 PACIFIC PARTS .e s2.268.10 INSTRIIMIEFT REPAIR 'rl 09-076 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $3,173.84 SAFETY SUPPLIES I; C99077 _ _ PACT EL CELLULAR 699.12 JASTIRONE SSERVIC I p 99079 PAK WEST 1594.95 OBIITORENT SERVICE 099979 PARKER PRODUCTIONS. INC. s94.95 9IDPA RENTAL 09e PA S 099081 PHOTO B SOUND CO. f75.26 RENTAL Eg01FMRNT 09%1,12 PICKWICK PAPER $739.54 PAPER PRODUCTS P_ 0 R9 '85 PR A Ell S ET M C. f4 2 0 SLUDGE mom H.O.5-11-ag P°j 099084 PY ENTERPPlS ESr INC. $595.72 SdPEi4 SUPPLIES 999C85 POLY FABRICS $438.84 PIPE p 990R6 PO p RF in 9 g] CATIONIC PfILMRR M.OA-11-R] ".FYI 099C87 SHEPHERD $11.01 MECHANICAL PARTS C99GSP HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE f66.00 ICE GO 999090 RECTO. INC. f45.600.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O. 5-11-80 099091 RED WING SHOES $06.45 SAFETY SHOES u n 099093 RENEE ENGINEERING CO. S1_.174.48 MANHOLE COVERS Ir` 1 099P94 RICHARDS. WATSON. OREYFUSS S9.094.50 LEGAL SERVICES M 099096 RICHARD ROLFE $239.57 MEETING EXPENSE tt�� 099097 ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY $185.57 ELECTRIC PARTS Ha �" na9ne _ Iucmnwn* n 61 099999 RYAN-NERCO 606.0E RARDM RE a �" 099100 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. f66.40 PARTS CLEANER Iu' 099102 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT-L S99.112.03 OCEANOGRAPHIC RESSARCB M.0.8-10-BB 099103 SEA COAST DESIGNS 5168.54 OFFICE MACHINE"112 r. p ' _ ra'uNeTRr n r 099106 SHAMROCK• INC. $391.80 HARDWARERT SOPPLIBS t` 099106 SHAMROCK SUPPLY f391.80 IIARWARE p 099298 SLIDE MAKERS WEST 633.00 SLIDE SERUM 099109 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1.870.43 TOOLS IV 199111 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $32:119.[4 AQMD FEES*Pr ` 099112 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. a9.410.iE POWER L"I 099114 STARBUCK TRUCK REFINISHING 51.95C.OA VEeICLC REPAIR 099118 STAROW STEEL S531.58 METAL Y. FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/05/89 PAGE 6 j REPORT NUMBER AP13 Ia CLAIMS PAID 01/12109 POSTING DATE 04/12/09 D 099116 STAR TOOL A SUPPLI CO. SIi915.23- TOOLS 099118 SUMMIT STEEL $1.616.56 MEYAL 099119 THE SUPPLIERS 94.116.80 YOOLS/RARDYAME •� 099122 TeR TAKAMINE $2.440.06 CUNYRACT LANDSCAPING C99122 TeYLOR-DU NN $516.65 =I PARTS 1fI 099124 TEKTRONIX. INC. 5184.00 INSTRUMENT MALES 099121 TELAUT0GRAPH CORPORATION S2.369.24 OFFICE McKIm („ b, 09112) TXOMAS TEMPORARIES 6330:36 TEMPORARY SERVICES btl 099128 TRAVEL TRAVEL SIS43O.16 TRAVEL SERVICES n winTRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY9 INC. $6.29 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES ` N•j 099131 IN UNSFECT $943.2- ROAD TESTING .- 000152 "`iR1NT. X 099133 ULTRA SYSTEMS52.221.WC' ENGINEERING SERVICES �• 24 09?]34 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3173.5/ PARCEL SERVICES I]O 099136 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. :2.739.SC FITTINGS �!� 09913) J.J. VAN HOUTEN 6 ASSOC . INC. 36.213.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES FLY 2 "N NBSTOANO R6INIIOGN Si1F OF — LAMP SFJIVifRS 1" °ein 09?139 VARIAN ASSOCIATES. INC. 984.918.60 INSTRUMENT M.O. 12-14-88 N`I I 999196 RICHARD Y. VON LARGER $81.10 MEETING MUSE N:. 1>• 099112 WAUKESHA-PEARCE IND..INC. $6,710.75 MECHANICAL PARTS 099113 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SEE. S1.760.DC LAR SERVICES X. �1 ""-•'1-- WESfER•• "v--v.A-TE--eHf*itLAL 9"PPbV -^ '" -- CAIISYIC 600A 11 0 1-CO 8/ 099145 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. "•5617.87 ELECRIC SUPPLI85 6,! CSO146 WILLOAN ASSOCIATES 5332.5; ENGINEERING SERVICES DIST 2 I. !t3-AN9 ffifto of __ `••DSPORODUCt101>— j 099118 XEROX CORP. 56.320.06 COPIER LEASES {tl� 099119 EVERETT M. YORK CO. 5506.09 MECHANICAL PARTS P- lSB ' RICH No YOUNG PROO wt ap YFTCR SUROLIIR ----------------- le' 4.1 coeeeexaeec acaea h,. i.a w N` I.a k If It: • POND NO 9199 - IT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/05/89 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER M43 j COONf4 SAMITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/12/89 POSTING DATE 04/12/89 �S a� OUNeY ARDEW I a SI OPER PODS 4 3.50 I•! 42 OPER POND 345.63 :I 12 F/R POND 450.00 1� P3 OPER FOES 7,913.47 T PO 93 P/R FFUN 1.725.00 +' 95 OPER POND _ 5.280.26 SS P/R PUD 53.43823 .71 "a P7 OPER POND 2,340.20 al R15,42L.05 � 9ll OPER FUND 183.26 p:•� 914 AC0 FUND 1,137.50 6 EH i•�; 9566 ACO POND 28,727.94 0667 OPER POND 2,816.56 P+ 76 OPER FUND 429.42 ua X JT GPM FUND 6.1 CORP 206,902.25 2.101,989.95 CO ;n PON88D NORERR$FUND INSUMNCR POND JT WRKING CAPITAL POND 139.639.99 �a oc V u: Iac� W- I•: b. Iva Iw ' FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/20199 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 BOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE E8UNF' CLAIMS PAID 04/26/BT POSTING DATE 04/26/89 ARRANT NO. VENDOR BESERIPTION �a 099169 NSL CONSULTING ENGINEERS fl•195.39 - LONG DISTANCE EETEIEPS DIST 3 _LONG BISrANCB TELEPHONE 099167 ACLU C SLUDGE CONST $243.93 SANI'LCONSTRUCTION 099167 ADVAMCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. f35... RO CON6TRIGAIp 7-30-I P.i1B- 39 ASPHANiCbb FAA76 099170 ALL ANCRICAN ASPHALT f26.76 ASPHALT h; 099I70 LEASING ASSOC]AYES/ALLSTATE it•532.98 "FICL8 IiASE3 F 6r8 099172 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH $60.08 SECURITY DUPLICATION 099173 AM ERIWM SOUND t VIDEO S/4.99 GODPA DUPLICATION GXCAVA ION6B F 099176 THE ANCHOR SEWER KING CO.TION $2.651.35 EXCAVATION L 099176 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. it•651.35 MECHANICAL PASTS w- d. VALVE LUL£811FB — 099178 APCO VALVE t PRIMER CORD $ 07.06 VALVE PASTS 699179 ARALUN SYSTEMS $1.307.86 UNIFORM mHNd2SG — y3.2.1133.6j- -- INSTRUMENT NT S666 ' 1�fT1 099181 ARENS A INSTRUMENTS INC. f2$920.90 IIERUPART SUPPLIES m �= 099--- ARIZONA INSTRUMENTS CORP. f921 A0 l2TER PARTS 9.00 SOILPREO-9UPP6FE"r b0 099105 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING f1.113.60 SOIL NESTING 099185 3M50 31.SOB.00 NESTING REGISTRATION 1. .-iMIR. :i6 --IM9TRUlB!N�Rid'k .. 099187 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE f138.990.91 GRIT REMOVAL M.O. 7-13-88 Ili 099188 BANK OF AMERICA N7iSA $5.00 BANK CARDS C ASSOC. 84,29C.Co - BSYTOS-3,34,32,3? — C9.190 B. BATSMAN $575.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 799191 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 3507.66 LLB SUPPLIES "- 'IREPUND-USER MIPFRRPA 099193 BECK-3 TREE SERVICE $10.196.00 LANDSCAPING r 09919. JANES BENIIE S362.31 MEETING EXPENSE - TRAINING . 5- OFF.C. SBPPCEEN 099196 SOILA RADIATOR SERVICE 3333.90 RADIATOR NEPAIR 099197 BON-AMIUES $96.50 TSIICK REPAIRS P e 0199 STEVE BUBALD CONSTRUCTION CO. S70.192.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-1 99 099200 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. S95.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES BUSH AMU • AN6, �j VO�B---- RVErIN� 099202 GARY S. STREED $l•6A2.92 PETTY CASH pSUfBUBSp®IT M 099203 C t R RECONDITIDNING CO. f630.00 MECHANICAL PARTS Y — I1RN0 - 099205 CS COMPANY S5#460,77 RESTOCKING CBARCC k e� 099206 CAL-CMEN SALES $95.3232 GASKET sMH6aE'—__ 2992 DB CALTROL . INC. f38.96 REGULATOR PUTS 6 �m 099209 CALIFORNIA PANEL 6 VENEER $55.46 BUILDING HSTERIALS h FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/20/99 PAGE 2 - REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 04/26/87 POSTING DATE D4/26/69 AMOUNT _nrtCRTPTlftN S �c 099210 CAp pLLO-B OTLE.4 JOINT VENTURE 351. 61 ENGINEERING R9IC88 us B)-181 152 099212 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM SIS.OB7.52 TELEPHONE EQ9IMIST/SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 099213 CHEM SERVICE $1.129.21 LAB SUPPLIES °gSFS65.36_ 099215 I.V. CNESTERTON CO. S1.070.24 PACRLNG MATERIALS i'. C99216 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. S13.072.19 GASOLINE/OIL 6 GREASE 099218 KELLY CHRISTENSEN 3462.86 MRRTING CRPEEBE - SRAINIHC 099219 COLDYELL BANKER $22.92 REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT e RBBA3Ri 099221 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF f1.799.90 MECHANINI CAL PARTS I�I.`. 099222 COMPUTSERVE 111.95 COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES e °.03 AUTOMOTTVA RAATS 899224 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $3,193.35 ELECTRIC MIS " 099225 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $4,411.33 BLUEPRINTING "SII.2P---- Pu1¢'-YARis X 099227 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $167.01 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 2 09922E COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $408.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES • - RBPIFAL EQUZPM641i 099230 LARRY CURTI TRUCK S EQUIPMENT $26,220.00 ELMS REMOVAL M.0.4-13-88 7 q 099231 HORNET FOUNDATION. CSUS S116.60 TECHNICAL MANUALS � a— �T6- mp6BY1BD7F;N6URANGF AS EIIBNI6flRMF b10 099233 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S60.62 DIESEL USE TAR N 999234 STATE BOARD OF EQUALISATION 9450.45 BAZARDOUS WASTE TAX 17 ALLLolADVBRTI6EP16 099236 DANNY DEMTER 3311.23 TRAVEL MOSES - TRAINING 099237 DEW-PAR SALES f SERVICE 31.676.27 TRUCE PARTS 0 OHT{6 PO,V"9R6 ...985.86 M..,A 10 BB it 099239 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $63.60 PRINTING �< 099240 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $690.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT i< wiL P2— ^<ANT 099242 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $702.14 PAINT SUPPLIES 099243 DWYER INSTRUMENT. INC. f3R4.49 IKSTRmENT PUTS 99244 ­66 FITTINGS - 099245 ENS RESOURCES. INC. $734.80 CONSULTING SERVICES 099246 EASTMAN. INC. $218.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6 FR8IN B6Ryi 8EG 099248 ENGINEERING-SCIENCE s15.168.39 BNGINEIMNI SERVICES 12-18-2. J-19 099249 MARSHALL FAIRRES f340.00 DEFERRED CORP DISTRIBUTION 899298 JA 16 FAk GONER Sol SULTI11B-BBR 099251 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3,500.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3-7-4.J-20 094252 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP. $440.75 AIR MINT 099254 FERRELLGAS is39.00 PR00 MEART6 099255 FILTER SUPPLY CO. S1.766.02 FILTERS ..I FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/20/89 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 E COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/26/87 POSTING DATE 04/26/89 1 li E5CP1PTI OM 099256 FISCHER A PORTER CO. $6.439.84 CHLORINATION PARTS 099256 FLD-SYSTEMS $31,972.95 PUMP PARn 099259 OELBER PUMPS. INC. $1.283.68 Pw PARTS 099261 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT S1•391.T9 PAINT SUPPLIES I' 099262 DONALD L. FOR S ASSOCIATES S1r825.06 SAFETY CONSULTING 099264 CITY OF FULLERTON 53587.89.93 WATER USEAGE 099265 P. GARLAND 513.5 DEFERRED COMP PAY-OP7 ' ---�CELBPtl 099267 GERARDS PHOTO LAB $61.50 PHOTO LAR SERVICES 099266 GIEPLICH-NITCHELL• INC. 94.544.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS ENGINSERVICES HER 08-72 091270 M.R. HOLLYWOOD REFIG. DISYB. $573.35 LAB EQUIPMENT 099271 HACM COMPANY S38.10 LAB SUPPLIES 83T954990_ —....___—_.--uEPERMJUU ID'-MTTRIBUTION x099273 MARRINGTO; DU INSTPIAL PLASTICS S529.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS 099274 MATCH R KIRK. INC. 64.250.09 MECHANICN PARTS pD 099277 MARTIN MO C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. sir$50.99 DEFERESSORRED PUTS 099277 MARTIN ROLL SS 0.99 DEPERPED ROMP PAY-OFF '•' ..TOC-- 099279 ROUSE OF•BATT[PIES $2,613.05 BAPPERIES t: �j 09928E R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. 9999.57 PAINT SUPPLIES 999262 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 5198.94 SEWER REPAIRS i 999283 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $15.90 RUBBER STAMPS l' 099205 IMO OELAVAL INC. $30.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 099286 I.S.I. WEST $1,193.24 ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES I� 099288 INGRAM PAPER $253.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 099289 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 632.19 WATER USEAGE 9- 099291 JO0.N•S FABR S i ALTERATIONS f2]0.00 UNIFORM ALTERATIONS 099292 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $217.04 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 3:5'r -271F 099294 KAMAN BEARINGS S SUPPLY $472.17 FITTINGS '• 099295 KAMER COMPANY $2r233.C2 MECHANICAL PARTS i`' r �5- 099297 RUSSELL NEG6 519.3E DEFERRED COMP PAY-0F'P 099298 KIMMERLE EN S- INC. f70.A0 TOOL .11.11 . .02 _.-..- ' IICIICSGPPCiE3 09930E DONALD E. NINNEY 3835.0E DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTIONP P' 099503 KIPST PUMP S MACHINE WORKS f839.7^ _ _ PUMP PARTS a r Hal Y�I . FUND NO 9199 - JT 0187 WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0120/69 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 04/26/87 POSTING DATE 04/26/89 I . � +nx 099382 MARTIN KORDICK. SR $2.782.60 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-29.5-30 - 099304 L.B.W.S.. INC. S309.6T WELDING SUPPLIES 099305 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $38.88 LAW SUPPLIES ju MEETING EXPENSE - TRATNTNC 099307 LEE S RO CONSULTING ENGR. f507.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 09930E HOWARD LENORE $253.56 MUING EXPENSE - TRAINING sw+_nn 099310 in ITOpOUE CORP. $3.202.93 GATE REPAIRS P99311 LOD1 DOOR f35.05 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT r r ^RO 09931AINTENSNCE PRODUCTS. INC. . BEARINGS F 099314 HARDEN SU SCO $286 5206.20H6 20 REGIME EETIN REPAIRS -71 -MEBTINC EXPENSE - T6AININC 099317 MARVAC ELECTRONICS `$69.86 18STRU[4N1' SUPPLIES 09931T RASTER TOOLS SERVICES fe9.e6 TOOL �X 099329 MCFARLA ND PARTITIONS TI ONS f1.600.01 PARTITIONS • = 099129 NONE NNA EN6P. E IDUIP. f10 N59.30 PUMP PARTS f22 TS G7 099322 MEDLIN CONPOLS CO. fT86.96 GAUGE 099323 MICROAGE COMPUTER 53.671.89 COMPUTER ' -490.40--- — MANHOLE FRAM E _ t°to 099325 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. --'T$312.24 MECHANICAL PARTS 099326 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES SID7.9/ CELLULAR SERVICES 999328 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $5.440.16 VACUUM SERVICES 099329 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $130.28 PIPE FITTINGS .. 099331 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 4S4.00 WATER USEApgFL1SS 099332 NORTHWEST MOTOR WELDING. INC. $11,108.00 MECHANICAL PARTST" go v 099334 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $96.02 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 099335 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $296.60 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 99337 —$250.6I ^-^^•M STRIPING 099338 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE 5250.06 ROAD STRIPING 09933E ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING ING CO. S376.56 FITTINGS 3 --WLOYEEAp,cwwHEALTH 099341 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $63.92 PEMORS HEALTH ORKE PLAN INSURANCE 099391 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT f6.829.8s REMORSE WORKERS COMP INSUBAXCB POIm 99342 PAOIFI6 PARTS S898.iS —ItiGTRPARTIT-PAR28 099343 PACO PUMPS SA S186.81 PUMP PARTS J 099349 PACIFIC 866ETT EQUIPMENT CO. 2691.15 SAFETY SUPPLIES PACIFIC �--E099346HPARKER PRODUCTIONS. INC. 9289.8E VIDEO RENTALS PARTS ENGINEERING ON COMPANY 9988.62 COMPRESSOR PARTS -� FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/20189 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 04/26/87 POSTING DATE 04/26/89 HANSA 6T NO- VENDOR DESCRIPTION �e 09939E PARTS UNLIMITED 31.982.04 AUTUMOTIVE PARTS I' 9 IPIIITMI ... 611PPLE66 099350 PEL BOOKBINDING CORP. $26.76 PAPER In 099351 ROY PENDERGRAFT 3440.00 DEPERR® COMP DISTRIBUTION 099353 PIMA 600 SYSTEMS. INC. 699.330.55 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-II-89 099354 PITNEY BONES $159.21 POSTAGE METER SERIAL p+ 099356 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. 51.834.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 099357 POWER SPECIALISTS. INC. 6612.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS - $256.62-- TPPRBRPi1N.. !. 099359 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. 64.250.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.5-11-88 u 099360 PULSAFEEOER 5980.6C PUMP PARTS P .56— FRANK REIB m099362 RECYC. INC. $42,180.08 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 099363 RED WINO SHOES $248.35 SAFETY SHOES m 9 14t" - 49"olr--. ._ -NBYICE9 6 ADS ..x 099365 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $102.26 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ..S 099366 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM $3.000.00 POSTAGE —y1yy60.86 REFRIGERATOR 099368 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 63•092.93 FITTINGS •�� 099369 RICOH CORPORATION $194.78 COPIER LEASES — _ OiFii'E GO INS `IA 099371 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL S671.90 INSUDKER PARTS I� M 099372 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC S329.35 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 1 tlARDNAR6 099371 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTOL $269.634.51 OCEANOGEAPRIC RESEARCH M.0.8-10-88 099575 SEA COAST DESIGNS $506.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT .SOT— '--YI9Clr.... TOOLS p. 099377 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 6903.34 OFFICE FURNITURE 099378 SIGNAL FLASH CO. 9319.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES EtCpL-ERffiWDRIPER TESTEHl 099380 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS 9954.00 SOIL TESTING P99381 SOLMAR CORP. $19.951.50 "EIICALB O.DD- 099383 SOUTN COAST DODGE $9.09 TRUCK PARTS 099384 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $361.061.09 POWER 099386 SDUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $722.92 DIESEL FUEL 099387 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $1.523.30 MASER/COOLER RENTALS �893:78'-..._— TRLDTND'SOP 099389 SPEEDE SPEEDOMETER `75.42 DRIVER TESTING 099390 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. 6818.65 TOOLS • 265.0" '-�H01V6'1017RTZC-SeRV10ES-- �.: 099392 SUMMIT STEEL 92.951.19 METAL �• 099393 SUNSET FORD 9231.21 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/20/89 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 04/26/97 POSTING DATE 04/26/69 ' 1= 099194 SUPER CHEM CORP f50.88 PAINT SUPPLIES '1320 099396 TIE SUPPLIERS 12,638.7E UAROAAR¢ - 099397 T S C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS, INC $1,174.27 ELECTRIC PARSE xgygL. mnnonvsev svvmrv. 099399 THOMPSON BLUEPRINT f572.40 PRINTING D99400 TIDY DIDY SERVICE $671.10 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT �n yyR 099402 TRAVEL TRAVEL 11.481.01 TRAVEL SERVICES 099403 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY. INC. f1,632.29 TRUCK PARTS 099405 CITY OF TUSTIN f229.D9 WATER USEAGE 099.06 UNOCAL $168.07 GASOLINE - 099408 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE av$273 Be PARCEL SERVICES 099409 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR 1319:75 SERVICE ROUGHEST r a311.07_ OEI= n rnw L'.2E pp 099412 VAR SCIFNTIETL f2s313.07 OPERATING SUPPLIES = 099412 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 15,678.9C FITTINGS 099414 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL 557.22 G�2;Nz ;.rPARTSU.r 7 099415 VALVE SERVICES, INC. 5210.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS • bCl -- -4r172 44 _ .. D 99417 VERTEX SYSTEMS 51,850.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 07 099438 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $241.68 SAFETY SUPPLIES 099420 WARRINGTON $458.99 METER REPAIR 099421 PENNY WATKINS 546.33 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT ES! SoaSfSAMy+1ggQ.d¢—___ LAB SEPUIfRS 999423 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $51.868.22 CAUSTIC SODA H.0.8-10-88 C99424 WEST-L ITE SUPPLY CO. $151.50 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 029 ii; Si KNOTS IN 099426 WILSON-S EQUIPMENT RENTALS.INC $23,853.02 CONSTRUCTION SEBVIC68 7-12 _ 099427 ROURKE S WOODRUFF $19.920.23 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.10-14-87 .v 5— VALVE 099429 ARTHUR YOUNG $13.956.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - USER PEES 099430 RICHARD YOUNG PR00. $1.373.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES n� ps TOTAL CLAIMS PAID A4/26/87 $1.942.378.82 s<. I e' FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/20/89 PAGE 7 (AUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REPORT NUNBER AP43 AMMINT 02 OPER FUND E 5.306.53 03 OPEN.FUND 49.319.79 03 ACO FUND 171.00 - k al FIR mun an¢ nn 05 OPER FUND 4,885.42 1' 05 F/R FUND 1,626.80 ' _ �.. 07 OPER FUND 12.172.56 07 ACO FUND 5.521.64 011 OPEN FUND 7,721.37 r 011 ACO FUND 198.94 ¢ 248.19 ---_ 114 ACO FUND 700.00 05&6 OPEN FUND 4.949.21 i X 06&7 OPER FUND 32.74 s 07&14 OPER FUND 3.470.41 W CORP 255,754.16 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 7.937.36 i. KING CAPITA& FlINO --246.12&43 W13 1 & 1,942,078.81 h k- it s r: • .. _ _. .ice Y 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 11 21 32 51 61 71 112 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING ON MAY 17, 1989 p,T11TATlp,1, yaaovout= pro QlST: OGE 1co GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY CENTER ROOM A 11300 STANFORD AVENUE GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL An adjourned regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on May 17, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., at the Garden Grove Community Center, Roam A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman —Dan Crank -7—Dan Griset, Chairman pro in Dan Young = _ Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula Kennedy =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: A.B. "Buck' Catlin, Chairman _L__Chris Norby x William D. Mahoney, Chairman pro tem Beth Graham Roland E. Bigonger -7--Henry W. Wades -7—Dan Griset Dan Young Ron Isles x Carrey Nelson x James Neal _George Scott x Arthur G. Newton _Carol Downey =Bob Perry _Norman Culver x Iry Pickier _Fred Hunter 7—Wayne Silzel _James T. Fasbender =Don E. Smith Fred Barrera =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chai man Orbrey Duke xcarrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin =Edward L. Allen _Paul Yerellen -7—Wes Bannister John Erskine A.B. "Buck" Catlin =Chris Norby =Norman Culver _Bob Perry =Don R. Griffin Donna L. Chessen =Dan Griset _Dan Young x John Karel _ =William D. Mahoney _Beth Graham =James Neal George Scott =Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter -7—J.R. --Bob- Siefen —_Dewey Wiles x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth —7—Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom =Edna Wilson —Joe Hunt DISTRICT NO. 5: x John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman Evelyn Hart Donald A. Strauss, Chairman pro tem -7--Evelyn Hart =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman _Eric Johnson =Ruthelyn PI unmer, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart 7—Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman _Fred Barrera x Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tem _Ursula Kennedy 7-Dan Griset Dan Young 7--Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton =Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran Donald A. Strauss xJohn C. Cox, Jr. x James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tom Mays, Chairman _Jim Silva -7—Grace Winchell, Chairman pro tem Wes Bannister _L__Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Medea, Chairman Roland E. Bigonger a Iry Pickier, Chairman pro tem —Fred Hunter 7-Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton =Dan E. Smith Fred Barrera \� x Wayne Wedin _Ron Isles DISTRICT NO, 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller x Ursula Kennedy, Chairman pro tem —Richard B. Edgar =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton _2__Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran x Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera -2 05/17/89 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, / Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P.\.. Anderson, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Bob Oaten and Rich von Langen OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Jamel Demir, Kris Lindstrom, Curtis Spencer, Gary Robbins, Dewey Wiles, Andrea Berens, Jim Bevington, Renee Bevington, Rich ten Bosch, Chuck Bragg, Steve Brown, C. Burns, Roseann Cacciola, Allyn Cooksey, Larry Coonradt, Jeff Cross, Ed Evans, Scott 0. Flodin, Glen Frank, Kelly Hamilton, Mike Heineke, John S. Hingtgen, Gary Hoffman, Trude Hurd, Shannon Jakosky, Margaret Johnson, Sonja Klick, Bill Knopf, Beth Leeds, James Lenoci , Bernard Lipman, John Locke, Chris Ludlow, Mark S. Ludlow, Mike Luke, Dr. Yash Manchanda, Marcia Manker, Will Manker, Mitch Martinez, Monica Maur, Richard G. Maus, Patrick McNelly, Barry McPhee, Mark Melgian, Douglas Montague, Jerrell Lofton Moore, Jr., Moira Nonnweiler, Matt Nussbaum, J.A. Oliger, Jeff Page, Michael Pearson, Sam W. Peterson, Noelle Plack, Thomas Pratte, Lee Risner, Mary E. Rossi , Amy Rudell , Bill Samuel , R.J. Schwichtenberg, Bob Stokes, Jerry Thibeault, Patrick Wall , Roger Warren, Rick Wilson, Jean Winterfect * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 1 This 17th day of May, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , Adjournment of meeting due to lack being the time and place for the of quorum adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 1, the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary to 5:30 p.m. , Thursday, June 1, 1989 to consider modifications to the District's supplemental user fee program. DISTRICT 13 This 17th day of May, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , Ad-ournment of meeting due to lack being the time and place for the o quorum adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 13, the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. -3- 4 5/17/89 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that for Public Hearn on Draf Pro ram EIR the past two years a team of on Collec on, reatment and consulting experts and staff have been Disposal Facilities Master Plan engaged in a comprehensive evaluation of the engineering, environmental , public health, social and economic aspects of the County Sanitation Districts' plan of action for their wastewater management program for the next 30 years. He advised that one of the major elements of the "Action Plan" has been the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report that will be used as the basis for application to the EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for renewal of the Districts' ocean discharge permit for the next five-year period. Mr. Smith stated that the purpose of the hearing was to receive public commentary on the Draft Program Environmental but that the official comment period remains open through May 30th. He added that it is not intended that there will be any response to the public comments at the hearing that evening. Rather, following the hearing, the Boards will direct the consultants to address the oral and written comments received in the Final Program Environmental Impact Report which will be considered by the Boards at a later date. Open Public Hearing The Joint Chairman declared the hearing open at 7:42 p.m. Smnnar of Draft Pro ram EIR b environmental consu ant The Chair recognized Mr. Curtis Spencer of Jones and Stokes Associates, Inc., the independent environmental consultant that prepared the Draft EIR. Mr. Spencer briefly explained the Districts' function and presented a five-minute video on its operations. He reported that the Sanitation Districts serve 450 square miles of Metropolitan Orange County from the Newport Beach-Irvine area north and west to county lines. The Districts today serve a population of 1.8 million. Service Is provided by nine Sanitation Districts serving 23 cities and unincorporated County territory within this highly urbanized area. The Sanitation Districts treat an average of 260 millon gallons per day of wastewater. The wastewater reaches the two treatment plants through more than 800 miles of Sanitation Districts' sewers, fed by local sewers in upstream communities. Mr. Spencer further reported that the Districts control hazardous materials entering sewers through an aggressive industrial toxics source control program. Mr. Spencer stressed that this was an important means of reducing toxics in wastewater and sludge. All of the Districts' flows receive primary or advanced primary treatment and about half receive secondary treatment. Seventy-five percent of suspended solids reaching the plant are separated from the waste stream before discharge and come off as a wet sludge. Chemicals are also added to facilitate treatment and control odors. -4- 5/17/89 Mr. Curtis briefly described and showed the various treatment processes used by the Districts. The residual solids called sludge are trucked to disposal and reuse locations. About half of the sludge is disposed of �•r� at landfills where it is mixed with municipal refuse. The balance of the sludge is reused in agricultural applications to enhance soil fertility. Composting and use as a soil amendment is also practiced. The video also showed the Districts' ocean outfall where treated effluent is discharged from the plants to the ocean through a booster pumping station pipeline and diffuser complex. The diffuser begins discharging four miles offshore and extends another 6,000 feet, releasing effluent at depths from 170 to 195 feet. The underwater views of the pipe structure showed the marine life that live on and around it. He also advised that not all of the Districts' wastewater goes to the ocean, up. to 15 million gallons per day currently receive tertiary teatment and is reused for groundwater recharge and landscape irrigation. The consultant stated that the Sanitation Districts undertook preparation of an "Action Plan" study to evaluate how to best accommodate future service demands and treatment requirements. The actions proposed to meet those future needs are evaluated in the Environmental Impact Report, which he noted was the subject of the meeting that evening. Mr. Spencer then began his overview of the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilites Master Plan. A slide presentation accompanied his report depicting the various elements covered by the EIR. The Program EIR is just one element of the Districts' 30-year "Action Plan" for wastewater management. This "Action Plan" study began in 1987 with issuance of the Districts' - proposed "Action Plan for Balanced Environmental Management: Preserving Orange County' s Coastal Ocean Waters" and incoporates a complete review of the Sanitation Districts' activities including the following: " Scientific review of the Districts' comprehensive, five-year, $8 million, ocean monitoring program " A 30-Year Facilities Master Plan by Carollo-Boyle, a Joint Venture " An Environmental Impact Report by Jones 8 Stokes Associates and Willdan Associates " A Financial Plan by Bartle-Wells " A Public Participation Program by Urban Alternatives The consultant noted that all of these studies, programs and documents will culminate in the Districts' application to the Environmental Protection Agency and Regional Water Quality Control Board for a new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit in August 1989, for the next five-year period. -5- 5/17/89 Mr. Spencer itemized the major facilities identified in the 30-year Facilities Master Plan which could have environmental impacts including V� trunk sewers, expansion of treatment plant capacity, a second ocean outfall and additional satellite water reclamation plants. He also defined some of the terminology used in the Facilities Plan and EIR as a measure of treatment effectiveness and effluent quality. One term commonly used is "Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOO)" which is a laboratory test which measures the wastewater's potential effect upon the oxygen levels of a receiving water. The treatment plants are expected to expand to 399 mgd capacity by 2020 to keep pace with the anticipated flow increases. These flow estimates are based on the City and County general plans and are consistent with the Southern California Association of Governments regional growth projections. The consultant emphasized that treatment would be provided, as necessary, to protect beneficial uses of the Pacific Ocean and meet environmental regulations and permit requirements. Mr. Spencer then reviewed the three alternative treatment levels under consideration by the Boards of Directors to achieve the above-referenced objectives, as follows: SCENARIO NO. 1 - California Ocean Plan " 30% Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal " 75% Solids Removal (One-third of flow would receive secondary treatment) SCENARIO NO. 2 - Existing Permit Conditions " 60% Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal " 75% Solids Removal (One-half of flow would receive secondary treatment, same as existing concentration) SCENARIO NO. 3 - Full Secondary Treatment (by 2005) " 85% Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal " 85% Solids Removal The consultant continued with his summary of the proposed future treatment facilities and operations that may have an impact on the environment. With regard to sludge management, the Districts' objective is to promote multiple, independent reuse alternatives and maintain at least one reliable disposal alternative. He pointed out three possible satellite water reclamation plants. Reclaimed water would be used for groundwater recharge, landscape irrigation and industrial supplies. The Districts are considering from one to three plants which would supplement the existing Water Factory 21 and the planned Green Acres V...� Project, for a total reclamation capacity of 50 mgd. -6- 5/17/89 Mr. Spencer reiterated that an important part of the "Action Plan" is continuation of the toxics source control program. Under the Districts' I current program, heavy metals have decreased from over 2,000 pounds per day to 500 pounds per day, a 75% reduction over the last 12 years. A cornerstone of the Districts' °Action Plan" is continuation of the aggressive source control program. The cost of the proposed facilities included in the 30-year Facilities Plan will be about $3 to 3.8 billion in 1989 dollars. Approximately half of that cost is for operations and maintenance over the 30-year period. If the effects of inflation are taken into account, total costs reach from $7 to over $9 billion at 5% inflation. The cost to the users will increase from 1.5 to 3 times the current charges within the next 10-15 years. This will vary by service area and depending which Scenario of treatment level is selected by the Boards. The consultant advised that the Program Environmental Impact Report covers the entire Master Plan and evaluated the Master Plan facilities In comparison to existing conditions relative to growth impacts, construction impacts, resource impacts, operations impacts, public health and marine environmental issues. Said EIR also addresses alternatives to meet the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The alternatives considered Include the three treatment scenarios, a no-project alternative, 18 reclamation sites, 36 sludge management alternatives and trunk sewer alternatives. Mr. Spencer added that a Supplemental EIR would be necessary prior to construction of the second outfall , the reclamation plants and interplant pipeline. The "Do-Nothing Option" or no-project alternative would result in significant adverse impacts, such as sewer overflows, inadequate sewage treatment, environmental and public health impacts, construction moratoriums and fines against the Districts. He also addressed the growth-inducing issue in connection with plant expansion. He concluded that sewerage system expansion is growth inducing as defined by CEQA. However, he observed that the Sanitation Districts do not have land use authority, responsibilities nor mitigation responsibilities. The County of Orange and the cities do have that authority and responsibility. Flow projections are based on their land use plans. Growth and population projections used are consistent with the projections of SLAG and SCAQMD. Mr. Spencer stated that there is no difference between the treatment scenarios in terms of growth impacts. Impacts resulting from construction of the proposed facilities were also reviewed by the consultant. He pointed out that whenever waste is generated, it has to go somewhere. There are only three media to assimilate wastes--air, land and water. The EIR evaluated all of these. It found that all air quality standards would be met under all three scenarios. -7- 5/17/89 There would be a significant impact on the land from the additional sludge resulting from higher treatment levels. He noted that impacts on the water were especially important. Public health is of primary concern. Environmental issues evaluated relative to discharge to the Pacific Ocean included toxics, bacteria/viruses, water quality, marine life, beneficial uses of marine environment, and cumulative impacts of the Sanitation Districts' discharge considered in context with other ocean dischargers. With respect to viruses and bacteria, he pointed out that the EIR concludes for all three scenarios the location and depth of the outfall and favorable current conditions effectively preclude adverse impacts on public health. Mr. Spencer reiterated that industrial toxics control will remain an important part of the Sanitation Districts' program. He reviewed a graph showing the beneficial impacts of the ongoing industrial waste source control program. He added that there are no environmentally significant differences between the three scenarios with respect to discharge of toxics because of the source control program. He reported that some of the remaining suspended solids may settle near the diffuser including degradable organic matter, heavy metals and trace toxicants. It was pointed out that the area of impact by deposition, as estimated by change to feeding patterns of life forms near the diffusers, was approximated to be 28 acres for Scenario 1, 18 acres for Scenario 2, and 5 acres for Scenario 3. If the two outfalls were separated, the acreage impacted would only be about 1/3 of these figures. The consultant summarized the findings of the EIR indicating the document addressed each of the following major public health and environmental issues: ° Toxics ° Bacteria/viruses ° Water quality ° Marine life ° Beneficial uses ° Cumulative impacts Based on their study of the above issues, they concluded that they predict no standards violations will occur for any of the three scenarios, and expect no significant adverse marine impacts for any of the three scenarios. Water quality standards would be met by all three scenarios. Marine life would be protected and there would be no significant adverse impacts on beneficial uses. In looking at the cumulative impacts, they looked at long-term trends and found a decreasing level of impacts for the last decade. Mr. Spencer reiterated that the EIR indicates no significant adverse impacts on the marine environment. There would be significant increase in energy demands for the new �...i treatment facilities. The Districts do, however, produce energy from digester gas. Under Scenario No. 1 the least energy would be required to be purchased and Scenario No. 3 would require the most. -8- 5/17/89 Other resources affected by the various scenarios would be construction materials, chemicals used, personnel requirements and costs to / construct, operate and maintain additional facilities. Mr. Spencer said that Jones & Stokes concluded that resource allocations would increase, with Scenario No 3 requiring the greatest amount of resources. The land impact increases with Scenario 3 also. The marine environment impact decreases under Scenario 3. He reiterated that the Draft EIR finds that all three scenarios meet existing regulations; protect beneficial uses; and protect the environment from significant impairment. Mr. Spencer stated that the Districts must weigh the tradeoffs of alternatives, balancing small changes in the ocean against larger changes on land. Receive and file written comments It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written comments received from the persons listed on Attachment 1 to these minutes relative to the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Oral public comments Chairman Smith reiterated that the purpose of the meeting was to receive comments on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report. He requested that their remarks be kept to approximately five minutes and that in the interest of time that speakers not repeat previous commentary. The Chair then recognized the following persons who addressed the Boards: - Mar aret Johnson, 19742 Shorecliff Lane, Huntington Beach rs. Johnson stated that she represented t e Huntington Beach Homeowners Association as well as the American Cetacean Society and that she was there to request the Boards to go to full secondary treatment. She questioned the validity of the facts contained in the EIR relative to biological community. She commented on her view of the ocean conditions based on her personal observations. She also commented on the condition of the mouth of the Santa Ana River after a heavy rain. She also expressed concern relative to the sludge issue. She questioned whether different levels of purity were required for the sludges used for agricultural purposes and those that were discharged into the ocean. Mrs. Johnson added that in her view the organisms in the ocean are showing short and long-term changes, and she felt that something must be impacting them. - Shannon Jakosky, R W. Bay Avenue, Balboa Ms. Jakosky stated that she represented the Balboa community as well as the American Cetacean Society. Her comment was that she believed Orange County should strive to be the best that money can buy which, in her opinion, included the best sewage treatment available. She urged full secondary treatment. -9- 5/17/89 Shannon Jakosky (Continued) She also questioned whether data in the EIR was up to date quoting . surveys done in 1981, 1983 and 1984. Ms. Jakosky claimed that information in the document relative to the Pinneped (sea lion) community was inaccurate. She recommended that more current marine samples be taken and analyzed. She commented that she believed that toxicity, the public health issue and the marine environment were all interdependent and she didn't think that standard changes or any damaging changes were acceptable. - Moira Nonnweiler, 602 N. Linwood Avenue, Santa Ana Ms. Nonwe ler stated that she fully agreed with previous speakers. In addition, she commented that she did not think the greater amount of sludge produced under Scenario 3 was a significant disadvantage because one year ago all sludge went to landfills and now 50% is being used for agricultural purposes. She believed if that change could come about in one year, more uses could be found in the future. She requested that her recommendation for full secondary treatment be made a matter of record. - R. J. Schwichtenberg, 4141 Fireside Circle Irvine r. chwichtenberg expressed concern for future generations with regard to a clean environment. He felt it is a matter of cost and that this area could afford to implement the best treatment method. He stated that his recommendation was to do better than Scenario 3. - Ed Evans, 4793 Grace Avenue Cypress r. Evans stated he represented Coyote Creek Greens. He stated that he didn't feel the EIR addressed a broad enough environmental range. It does not discuss the full ethological consequences. It should be based on bioregionalism. He indicated that human wastes should be controlled at home, source reduction, and should be recycled and used for agricultural purposes. Beth Leeds, 1645 Pm0yd Drive, Laguna Beach Ms. Leeds stated that she�ident of the Orange County "Save Our Shores". She added that they believed that the projected growth of Orange County from 1.9 million to 2.8 million within the next 30 years will add to the degradation of the ocean, as well as the quality of life in Orange County. Of paramount concern to her is the capacity/growth issues and potential related health concerns. She urged the public to find ways to clean up the environment and stop future pollution. She opposed the 301(h) waiver and questioned whether the no-project scenario wasn't viable if the current system was upgraded. Ms. Leeds reiterated that she was against any growth-inducing projects. - Bernard Lioman, 2208 Via Caliente Fullerton Mr. Lipman indicated that he was a concerned citizen and was also representing the Orange County Group of the Sierra Club. The Sierra Club has gone on record as opposing the 301(h) waiver from the Environmental Protection Agency. He stated that the EIR does not address the cumulative demands on the ocean from storm drains, nor the effects of toxic dumping of dredge materials. He did not feel that the Districts should discharge any wastewater into the ocean unless it received secondary treatment. -10- 5/17/89 -Bernard Lipman (Continued) He also commented on the differences in heavy metal concentrations between Scenarios 2 and 3, and expressed his view that these materials could cause a tremendous deleterious effect on the environment. With regard to differences in cast of the scenarios, Mr. Lipman stated that he felt the additional sludge handling costs were minimal compared to the total cost of the initial construction of facilities. He concluded that the Sierra Club feels that full secondary treatment of sewage is necessary. - Scott Flodin 200 E. 16th Street Costa Mesa Mr. odin state2 that he represented the students of Orange Coast College, more particularly the Marine Mammal Research Group on campus. He agreed with previous comments. He also stated he believed that the marine mammals off the coast are not being monitored adequately. He referred to a 1984 survey listed in the EIR and stated that he felt more recent data should be collected. He stated that if there is not a fourth scenario, he would have to support Scenario 3. - John Hingtgen, 916 W. North, Anaheim Mr. Hingtgen commented that he felt the graphs in the EIR were misleading. In his opinion they appeared to minimize the differences between the three scenarios. He pointed out several examples which he felt distorted the information because of the scales used. He added that he believed the EIR understates the benefits of going to full secondary treatment while exaggerating the negative effects. Mr. Hingtgen suggested a new EIR be prepared. - Jim Bevington, 13761 Marquette Street, Westminster Mr. Bevtngtan indicated that he was a member of the Surf Rider Organization of Orange County. He asked that it be recorded that he is against the 301(h) waiver. We should utilize the best technology at hand and use the best available treatment processes, he said. He believed the added cost would be worthwhile. He added that facilities would have to be increased to meet the added demand by the year 2000 or 2020, and felt that the Districts should upgrade the facilities at the same time. He didn't think the people of Orange County would object to the additional cost. - Jerrell Lofton Moore, Jr. , 913 Huntington Street, Huntington Beach Mr. Moore agreed that the additional charge for fu11 secondary treatment seemed like a small price to pay. He didn't think it was the best solution but was the better one for now. He believed that additional study must be done and new solutions found. Mr. Moore added that secondary treatment is necessary in his view no matter what the costs are. - Thomas Pratte (na adthdress given) r. Pratte stated at he was representing the Surf Rider Foundation. He indicated that they felt the current 50% secondary treatment was inadequate. He noted that the EIR states that there is a 10-fold difference between Scenario 2 and full secondary treatment with regard to bacteria and viruses. He disagreed with those figures and observed that he believed there are a lot of unknowns with regard to the viruses. -11- • 5/17/89 Thomas Pratte (Continued) He also questioned why it would take until 2005 to complete the full secondary treatment facilities and whether it would be possible to obtain that treatment before the year 2000. Mr. Pratte encouraged the Sanitation Districts to take a very conservative approach towards handling their wastewater. He stated that there are less impacts on the marine environment with full secondary treatment, as well as less bioaccumulation and, in his opinion, less risk to swimmers and surfers. Close Public Hearing The Joint Chairman then announced that there being no further oral comments, he would declare the hearing closed at 9:07 p.m. Mr. Smith reminded the attendees..that there would be no response to the community at this meeting. Rather, after the close of the official comment period on May 30th, the consultants would address all the oral and written comments in a Final EIR to be considered by the Boards at a later date. Directing consultants to address Moved, seconded and duly carried: written and oral comments received on the Draft EIR and prepare Final That the consultants be, and are Program EIR after close of the hereby, directed to address oral comment period on May 30, 1989 and written comments received on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan and to prepare the Final Program EIR after the close of the comment period on May 30, 1989. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , May 17, 1989. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , May 17, 1989. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adj7ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m. , Wednesday, May 31. 1989, to consider modifications to the District's supplemental user fee program. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:10 p.m. , May 17, 1989. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Tdicurnment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 4:00 p.m., Wednesday, May 31, 1989, to consider modifications to the District' s supplemental user fee program. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:10 p.m. , May 17, 1989. -12- 5117/89 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: / Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , May 17, 1989. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m. , Wednesday, June 7, 1989, to consider modifications to the District's supplemental user fee program. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:10 p.m. , May 17, 1989. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , May 17, 1989. Secretary, Bids of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 8 14 -13- i "ATTACHMENT 1" Written comments have been received from the following relative to the Draft Pro ram Environmental Im act Report on the Collection Treatment and sposa ac lities Mas er an. Mark Astor City of La Habra 25471 Shoshone 201 E. La Habra Boulevard E1 Toro, CA 92630 La Habra, CA 90633-0337 William M. Behrens Robert Lindsey 1004 Carbon Canyon Road (Address not given) Chino Hills, CA 91709 Mechelle Matson Jim Bevington 21472 Redroso 13761 Marquette Street Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Westminster, CA 92683 William J. Mautz Charles A. Brewer III and family 1860 Genneyre Street 20960 Charter Oak Terrace Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Marie Mulroy California State Lands Commission 1739 Candlestick Lane 1807 - 13th Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 Sacramento, CA 95814 Mrs. E. R. Robison Costa Mesa Sanitary District 4682 Warner P. 0. Box 1200 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200 Gordon B. Ruser R. L. Davis 1221 South Sycamore Street 7 Hawkridge Santa Ana, CA 92707 Irvine, CA 92714 Fred E. Switger Theresa Ebeling 717 E. Virginia Road 5318 W. Lucky Way Fullerton, CA 92631 Santa Ana, CA 92704 U.S. Marine Corps Terri Gautier Marine Corps Air Bases P. 0. Box 15262 Western Area Newport Beach, CA El Toro (Santa Ana) , CA 92709 Warner George Elsa L. Weber 862 N. Prospect Park 18091 Westlake Avenue Tustin, CA 92680 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Anita Griffin Martha Wida 2080 Santa Ora, #8 6441 Shawnee Road Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Westminster, CA 92683 Jean Hermanson Jean Winterfelt 17587 Mead Street 1945 Port Weybridge Place Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Newport Beach, CA Eber 8 Lorraine Knapp Barbara Wood 7152 Santee Avenue 40 Navarre, #301 ..J Westminster, CA 92684-0001 Irvine, CA 92715 David Kobel 16736 Barefoot Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92649 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 F ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING MAY 17, 1989 - 7:30 p.m. Garden Grove Community Center 11300 Stanford Avenue, Room A Garden Grove, California Adjournment of meeting by Secretary This 17th day of May, 1989, at due to lack of quorum 7:30 p.m. , being the time and place for the Adjourned Regular Meeting of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District No. 1 was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary to 5:30 p.m. , Thursday, June 1, 1989, to consider modifications to the District's supplemental user fee program. Secretary of tlfe Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORN A MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING MAY 17, 1989 - 7:30 p.m. Garden Grove Community Center 11300 Stanford Avenue, Roam A Garden Grove, California • � e e x : x e e f f x ■ : : f Adjournment of meeting by Secretary This 17th day of May, 1989, at due to lack of quorum 7:30 p.m. , being the time and place for the Adjourned Regular Meeting of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District No. 13 was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. Secretary of he Board Of D rectors County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California °+• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING May 31. 1989 - 4:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the adjourned regular meeting of May 17, 1989, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:12 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Ruthelyn Plummer, Don R. Roth DIRECTORS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes and Gary G. Streed OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Steven Wolff, Alan D. Aronson and Michael Goodman Actions re appeal of Norlyn Builders regarding District connection fees charged far property located at 1455 Superior Avenue, Newport Beach Receive and file a eal submitted Moved, seconded and duly carried: by Rosenfel indsey 8 Wo ff on behalf of Norlyn Builders That the notice of appeal submitted by Rosenfeld, Lindsey 8 Wolff, dated May 4, 1989, on behalf of Norlyn Builders, regarding connection fees charged pursuant to Ordinance No. 612 for property located at 1455 Superior Avenue, Newport Beach, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Report of General Counsel The District' s General Counsel reported on the appeal of Norlyn Builders which included their letter dated May 4, 1989, and attachments consisting of several letters between Norlyn, the City of Newport Beach and the Sanitation District. He reported that Norlyn Builders was assessed a $219,000 connection fee for the 146-unit senior citizens residence inn, based on the connection charge of $1,500 per unit, in accordance with District' s Ordinance No. 612. Mr. Woodruff stated that Norlyn Builders contend that they should have been y� assessed as a commercial property, like a hotel , rather than as a residential building. The District contends that Norlyn was correctly assessed as residential property similar to that of any other building with individual living quarters is assessed, for each individual unit. -1- 5/31189 DISTRICT 6 The General Counsel briefly reviewed the arguments and conclusion contained In his Memorandum of May 24, 1989, making comparisons between the definition, and uses of a "hotel" versus a "residence". He stated that there is no meri. to Norlyn's contention that it is a "hotel " facility rather than a �•J "residential " facility for the purposes of connection fees. The facility' s use of the sewage system is at least as intensive as that of an apartment house which is required to pay a residential connection fee for each unit. Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried: Memorandum dated May 24, 1989 That the General Counsel ' s Memorandum dated May 24, 1989, regarding said appeal , be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Presentation by Norlyn Builders The Chairman recognized Mr. Steven Wolff, of Rosenfeld, Lindsey 8 Wolff, attorneys representing Norlyn Builders. Mr. Wolff stated that the facility located at 1455 Superior Avenue, Newport Beach, is licensed and regulated by the State Department of Social Services. He advised that the development is in an area zoned for conrnercial buildings. Mr. Wolff contended that the project has unique requirements that do not generally apply to typical residential units. Because of construction obligations, they paid the connection fees under protest in order to proceed with the project. Mr. Wolff further commented on conversations with the District and correspondence included in their appeal submittal between Norlyn, the District and the City regarding the connection fee assessment. Mr. Wolff stated that this facility is an interim, assisted-care facility for the aged, and the owners will be providing many of the same services as a convalescent home. He also commented on the parking requirements for commercial versus residential developments, indicating that their one-quarter space per unit more closely met the commercial requirements rather than the residential requirements. Mr. Wolff also contended that the absence of a complete kitchen in each unit would preclude them from being classified as "dwelling units" as defined by the District's ordinance. He questioned the criteria used in the General Counsel 's Memorandum relative to the residents' permanent address which would be used for their mail , voter registration, etc. He reiterated that their facility more closely resembles a convalescent hospital which is classified as a commercial establishment. Mr. Wolff also noted that if said facility was determined to be a hotel by the City of Newport Beach, they were prepared to pay whatever hotel tax was assessed them. Mr. Goodman, one of the owners of the facility, also addressed the Board. He reiterated that the State Department of Social Services regulates this type of facility and they do not consider it as an apartment-type unit. He also advised that when the project was originally conceived, the land was zoned for administrative, professional and commercial . -2- 5/31/89 DISTRICT 6 Response by General Counsel and The District's General Counsel staff responded to what he indicated were some rather gross inconsistencies in the statements and documents of Norlyn Builders. Norlyn stated that if the hotel bed tax was appropriate, they would be prepared to pay the annual tax of $236,520. However, they also stated to the Sanitation District that they had not planned on, nor were prepared to pay, the one-time District connection charge of $219,000. He also pointed out that the original set of plans submitted to the City of Newport Beach contained the term retirement "home° while the set of plans given to the Sanitation District had been changed to read retirement "hotel ". Mr. Woodruff refuted Mr. Wolff's comment regarding parking and stated that if this facility was classified as a hotel , the parking requirement would be greater than for residences, not less. He added that the high density land use of the 146-unit complex on 8/10 of an acre places a tremendous load on the Sanitation District's facilities. Director Plummer expressed concern that perhaps this type of development did not fit into either category--commercial or residential , but that a separate category should be established to address this type of user as there are several more establishments of this type planned for the future. It was pointed out that the issue before the Board that evening was whether this is a residential unit or a commercial building based on use of the building and the impact on the sewer system. - Denying appeal of Norlyn Builders It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the appeal of Norlyn Builders, dated May 4, 1989, regarding the connection fee charges pursuant to District Ordinance No. 612 for property located at 1455 Superior Avenue, Newport Beach, be, and is hereby, denied. Director Ruthelyn Plummer requested that her abstention from voting on the motion be made a matter of record. Status Re art on District' s sewer The Director of Engineering reviewed the rehabil its t on program and Master status of the District' s rehabilitation Plan of facilities program and the master-planned facilities included in the new Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan currently being considered by the Directors as part of the Joint Districts' 30-year "Action Plan" program. The District has embarked on a major rehabilitation and construction program relative to trunk sewers that will serve approximately two-thirds of the City of Costa Mesa. District 6 will participate in a portion of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, between Fairview Road and Treatment Plant No. 2, along with Districts 7 and 14. District 6 will also have to build a parallel trunk sewer in Fairview Road to relieve the existing line. Districts Nos. 5 and 6 have completed rehabilitation of the Coast Highway Force �.. Main. He added that District 6 also has a gravity sewer in Coast Highway that needs to be replaced but because of the District's financial condition, staff will try to postpone that work for as long as possible. -3- 5/31/86 DISTRICT 6 Mr. Dawes also advised that the trunk sewer in Newport Boulevard, which serves the development around Hoag Hospital , needs to be supplemented with a parallel line. The sewer system improvements which will be needed over the next SO-year period �•J total $SO million. Mr. Dawes noted that this was a little higher than previously anticipated because of projected higher density land uses. Update on long-range financial The General Manager reported that in program and consideration of 1983 the Board modified their long-range amendments to existing sanitary777 financial program and implemented a sewer service Charges supplemental user fee to make up the shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and provide the additional financing necessary for both operations and maintenance costs as well as major facilities' rehabilitation. User fees are charged to all properties connected to the sewer. Funds for facilities' expansion are Currently provided from connection fees on new development paid by the developer. In 1986 the Board also considered the issuance of Certificates of Participation (COP' s) to partially finance their share of the joint works construction at the treatment plants but the District 6 Board decided against this proposal . The Acting Director of Finance then reviewed the District' s financial projections for the next ten years. Based upon the Facilities' Master Plan and the Financial Plan recommendations contained in the 30-year "Action Plan" now under consideration by the Joint Boards, District No. 6 will exhaust its capital funds as soon as 1990-91. The "Action Planu recommends that the District's share of the treatment plant construction and the trunk sewer construction be financed by a combination of borrowing (i.e., COP' s) and increased connection fees. Debt retirement and escalating operating and maintenance costs would be paid by annually increasing the supplemental user fees. He noted that the user fee is projected to escalate at an accelerated pace to maintain the District' s financial integrity. However, there are several unknowns that may have a major impact on the District's funding requirements. Staff reported that a considerable portion of the District' s major funding shortfalls are for capital financing. Staff' s projections assume that all construction projects proceed on schedule. Thus, the estimates can be considered "worst case" scenarios. However, the Districts continue to experience delays in major projects because of SCAQMD requirements. Further delays in these projects would also delay, or at least spread out, the need for capital funds. It was also pointed out that, conversely, as the Directors were aware, if the secondary treatment waiver is not renewed in 1990, the Districts' capital needs will increase substantially. All projections currently being submitted to the Directors assume the renewal of the Districts' 301(h) waiver permit. Mr. Streed then reviewed the current fee schedules of the District, as follows: Single-Family Multi-Family Comnercia/Industrial / Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other One-time Connection $1,500 per $1,500 per $300 per 1,000 sq. Fee dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building �...� Annual User Fee $34.85 per $20.92 per $24.95 per 1,000 sq. dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building -4- • - 5/31/89 DISTRICT 6 The Acting Director of Finance explained the District's cash flow projections were based on several assumptions. Scenario 2 of the "Action Plan", which recommends continuation of the current treatment levels under the 301(h) waiver, is the staff's preliminary preferred alternative recommendation. It represents the minimum probable level of construction, operation and maintenance costs. For the first five years of the planning period, the differences between Scenarios 2 and 3 (full secondary treatment) would not be significant. Additional flow and sewer connection assumptions are also consistent with the Master Plan. With regard to connection fees, the Master Plan Financial Plan recommends a change in the method of determining connection fees. The recommended change, which Mr. Streed indicated was incorporated in the cash flow projections, is to include the cost of future facilities on a per-unit basis. The reason for including these costs is that the Districts currently operate near capacity and any new flow will require new additional facilities. He noted that once the Boards determine the appropriate wastewater management program under the "Action Plan", a change would be reflected when the residential connection fee is projected to be $2,260 under Scenario 2. Mr. Streed reported further that over the next 10 years COP-type borrowing totaling $29 million is projected to be needed to meet ,joint works treatment and District sewer capital requirements, the first issue probably In 1990. He indicated that a more detailed analysis would be performed and presented to the Directors before any debt is issued. The cash flow projections are for several small issues on the theory of borrowing as little as possible and only when absolutely necessary. All issues are assumed to be at a fixed rate of 81. for 20 years. It was pointed out that the Health and Safety Code permits the user fees to repay debt; and as the only controllable source of revenue for the District, they are projected for use to repay the necessary new debt. The Directors then entered into a discussion of the District' s financial condition and alternative means of funding the needs, particularly the possible issuance of debt certificates. The General Manager reiterated that the decision as to whether or not to issue debt was not before the Directors at this time. He noted that the purpose of this meeting was ,just to consider adjusting the user fees for next year. Before a decision is required relative to Incurring debt, staff will provide a more detailed analysis of the District' s needs and the Board will make a decision at that time. If the Board should decide against borrowing, the near-term user fees would probably need to be double what they would otherwise be. The General Manager then reviewed the draft ordinance included with the agenda material which increases the supplemental user fees, as follows: Single-Family Multi-Family Commercia/Industrial/ Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other Annual User Fee $49.00 per $29.00 per $35.00 per 1,000 sq. dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building Staff added that no change in the connection fee schedule was recommended at this time. After a final decision is made by the Boards regarding the NPDES Permit `...✓ renewal , they would be presenting their recommendations to the Board relative to increasing the connection fees. -5- 5/31/89 DISTRICT 6 Actions re proposed Ordinance No. 6 33 First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: ... Ordinance No. 613 That proposed Ordinance No. 613, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 612, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 613 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 613, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 612, be introduced and passed to second reading on June 14, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the Districts' administrative office. Makin flndin that adoption of Following a verbal report by the Ordinance No. 13 1s categorically General Counsel it was moved, exempt per CEQA Guidelines seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 613 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273, in that the Ordinance establishes fees for operation and maintenance expenses of the District. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:34 p.m. , May 31, 1989. Secretary, boara of Directors County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California -6- w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 F ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING May 31, 1989 - 5:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the adjourned regular meeting of May 17, 1989, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Jahn C. Cox, Jr. , Chairman, Evelyn Hart, Don R. Roth DIRECTORS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes and Gary G. Streed OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel 4 1 f • f • / ! ! !t 1 ! R t \ Y Y 4 * Y k k ! f ! t Status Re ort on District's sewer The Director of Engineering reviewed the rehab tation program and Master status of the District's rehabilitation Plan of facilities program and the master-planned facilities included in the new Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan currently being considered by the Directors as part of the Joint Districts' 30-year "Action Plan" program. There have been multiple contracts completed over the past eight or nine years and the Districts 5 and 6 dual force main in Pacific Coast Highway has been completely rehabilitated. The new Master Plan has identified additional future deficiencies with regard to the gravity sewer built in 1936 in Pacific Coast Highway but replacement of the sewer is not planned for several years depending on the District' s financial resources. Other upcoming major projects proposed in the Master Plan are improvements to the Bay Bridge Pump Station and the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. Staff also noted that it will be necessary to replace the sewer line beneath Big Canyon Golf Course in approximately 10 years. With regard to the downcoast area, Mr. Dawes reported that it will be necessary to build a sewer and a pump station in accordance with the agreement previously entered into with the Irvine Ranch Water District. They have prepaid the required connection fees and the agreement provides for payment of 100% of the cost for all of the facilities south of the existing City of Newport Beach limit. The cost for the facilities will total approximately $4.5 million but this will be borne entirely by Irvine Ranch Water District. Several of the projects will be required in the late 1990' s and Mr. Dawes reported that sewer system improvements over the next 10-year period would total over $17 million. -1- 5/31/89 DISTRICT 5 Update on long-range financial The General Manager reported that program and consideration of in 1981 District 5 was the first of the amendments to existing sans ary Districts to Implement a supplemental sewer service charges user fee program to make up the shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and provide needed additional financing for operations and major rehabilitation work on the sewer system. New development pays a separate connection fee for sewage system capacity. He further advised that when the program was originally presented to the public and adopted by the Board, it was anticipated that it would be necessary to increase the fees by approximately 77% beginning with the second year to finance the rehabilitation work on the trunk sewer system. The District has been able to delay any increase In the supplemental user fees originally adopted in 1981 due to a significant decline in inflation rates, receipt of favorable bids on various District and joint works construction and rehabilitation projects, and delays in various major plant projects, all of which have reduced District expenditures and cash flow requirements well below originally anticipated levels. In response to a State Water Resources Control Board ruling, the Directors ordered a change in the supplemental user fee program from a water-meter-size basis to a flat fee for single and multi-family residences, and fees for other facilities based on square footage of improvements. This change was effective for the 1987-88 fiscal year. In 1986 the Board considered and rejected the issuance of Certificates of Participation (COP' s) in concert with other Districts to partially finance the District' s share of joint treatment works construction. The Acting Director of Finance then reviewed the District' s financial projections for the next ten years. Based upon the Facilities' Master Plan and the Financial Plan recommendations contained in the 30-year "Action Plan" now under consideration by the Joint Boards, District No. 5 will exhaust its capital funds as soon as 1990-91. The "Action Plan" recommends that the District's share of the treatment plant construction and trunk sewer construction be financed by a combination of borrowing (i.e. , COP' s) and increased connection fees. Debt retirement and escalating operating and maintenance costs would be paid by annually increasing the supplemental user fees. He noted that the user fee is projected to escalate at an accelerated pace to maintain the District's financial integrity. However, there are several unknowns that will have a major impact on the District' s cash flow requirements. Staff reported that a considerable portion of the District's major funding shortfalls are for capital financing. Staff's projections assume that all construction projects proceed on schedule. Thus, the estimates can be considered "worst case" scenarios. However, the Districts continue to experience delays in major projects because of SCAQMD requirements. Further delays in these projects would also delay, or at least spread out, the need for capital funds. It was also pointed out that, conversely, as the Directors were aware, If the secondary treatment waiver is not renewed In 1990, the Districts' capital needs will increase substantially. All projections currently being submitted to the Directors assume the renewal of the Districts' 301(h) waiver permit. -2- 5/31/89 DISTRICT 5 Mr. Streed then reviewed the current fee schedules of the District, as follows: Single-Family Multi-Family Commercia/Indust rial/ d./ Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other One-time Connection $1,500 per $1,500 per $300 per 1,000 sq. Fee dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building Annual User Fee $26.40 per $15.85 per $18.90 per 1,000 sq. dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building The Acting Director of Finance explained the District's cash flow projections were based on several assumptions. Scenario 2 of the "Action Plan", which recommends continuation of the current treatment levels under the 301(h) waiver, is the staff's preliminary preferred alternative recommendation. It represents the minimum probable level of construction, operation and maintenance costs. For the first five years of the planning period, the differences between Scenarios 2 and 3 (full secondary treatment) would not be significant. Additional flow and sewer connection assumptions are also consistent with the Master Plan. With regard to connection fees, the Master Plan Financial Plan recommends a change in the method of determining connection fees. The recommended change, which Mr. Streed indicated was incorporated in the cash flow projections, is to include the cost of future facilities on a per-unit basis. The reason for including these costs is that the Districts currently operate near capacity and any new flow will require additional facilities. He reported that no change in the connection fee schedule was recommended at this time. After a final decision is made by the Boards regarding the NPDES Permit renewal , staff would be presenting their recommendations to the Board relative to increasing the connection fees, probably to take effect October 1, 1989, when the residential connection fee is projected to be $2,260 under Scenario 2. Mr. Streed reported further that over the next 10 years COP-type borrowing totaling $42 million is projected to be needed to meet joint works treatment and District sewer capital requirements. The first issue is projected for 1990. He indicated that a more detailed analysis would be performed and presented to the Directors before any debt is issued. The cash flow projections are for several small issues on the theory of borrowing as little as possible and only when absolutely necessary. All issues are assumed to be at a fixed rate of 8% for 20 years. It was pointed out that the Health and Safety Code permits user fees to repay debt; and as the only controllable source of revenue for the District, they are projected for use to repay the necessary new debt. The Board then entered into a discussion of the possible increases in user fees based on different assumptions, including Scenario 3 requiring full secondary treatment, and the financing alternatives. Staff indicated that the biggest increase under a full secondary treatment scenario would be required around the turn of the century and again when the treatment facilities would first come on line in the year 2005. At this time, it is estimated that the user fees would increase by an additional $50-75 per year. -3- 5/31/89 a, DISTRICT 5 The General Manager then reviewed the draft ordinance included with the agenda material which increases the supplemental user fees, as follows: Single-Family Multi-Family Conmercia/Industrial/ Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other Annual User Fee $45.00 per $27.00 per $32.00 per 1,000 sq. dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building Actions re proposed Ordinance No. 51 First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 519 That proposed Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 519 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading on June 14, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., at the Districts, administrative office. Makin findin that adoption of Following a verbal report by the Ordinance No. 51 is categorically General Counsel , it was moved, exempt per CEQA Guidelines seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 519 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273, in that the Ordinance establishes fees for operation and maintenance expenses of the District. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 6:08 p.m. , May 31, 1989. Secretary, Boary of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California -4- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING June 1, 1989 - 5:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment by the Secretary of the adjourned regular meeting of May 17, 1989, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:49 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset and Ronald B. Hoesterey DIRECTORS ABSENT: Roger R. Stanton STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes and Gary G. Streed OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel k k k # k k k # # # # k # # # # # k k k # # # k # Y Update on long-range financial The General Manager reported that in program and consideration of 1984 District 1 modified its long-range amendments to existing sanitary financial plan. This plan established sewer service charges one-time sewer connection fees for new development to finance facilities expansion, and a supplemental user fee to make up a shortfall in ad valorem tax revenues and provide the additional financing necessary for both operations and maintenance as well as major facilities rehabilitation. The financial plan was adopted after considerable study to avoid projected short and long-range funding shortfalls in revenues required to finance the District's operating and capital expenses, which are escalating due to the rising cost of meeting environmental and public health standards established by state and federal regulatory agencies. Mr. Sylvester then reviewed the current fee schedules of the District, as follows: Single-Family Multi-Family Cortmercia/Industrial / Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other One-time Connection $1,500 per $1,500 per $300 per 1,000 sq. Fee dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building Annual User Fee $34.32 per $20.60 per $24.57 per 1,000 sq. dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building �/ -I- 6/01/89 DISTRICT 1 He further reported that the Districts all have a separate industrial user fee billed annually by the Districts for users that place a higher demand on the Districts' sewerage system. In 1986 the Board also elected to issue $24,700,000 in Certificates of Participation (COP's) in concert with Districts Nos. 2 and 3 to partially finance District 1's share of joint treatment works construction and to purchase additional equity in the joint treatment works to reflect the new flow-based joint works equity formula. The Acting Director of Finance then reviewed the District's financial projections for the next ten years. Based upon the Facilities' Master Plan and the Financial Plan recommendations contained in the 30-year "Action Plan" now under consideration by the Joint Boards, District No. 1 will exhaust its capital funds as soon as 1990-91. The nAction Plan" recommends that the District' s share of the treatment plant construction and trunk sewer construction be financed by a combination of borrowing (i.e. , COP's) and increased connection fees. Debt retirement and escalating operating and maintenance costs would be paid by annually increasing the supplemental user fees. He noted that in 1988-89 the District had increased the user fees by 30% to finance District activities. Staff's recommendation for 1989-90 is for another 30% increase. However, in the next few years the user fees may have to escalate at an accelerated pace to maintain the District's financial integrity. However, there are several unknowns that may have a major impact on the District' s cash flow requirements. Staff reported that a considerable portion of the District' s major funding shortfalls are for capital financing. Staff's projections assume that all construction projects proceed on schedule. Thus, the estimates can be considered "worst case" scenarios. However, the Districts continue to experience delays in major projects because of SCApMD requirements. Further delays in these projects would also delay, or at least spread out, the need for capital funds. It was also pointed out that, conversely, as the Directors were aware, if the secondary treatment waiver is not renewed in 1990, the Districts' capital needs will increase substantially. All projections currently being submitted to the Directors assume the renewal of the Districts' 301(h) waiver permit. Mr. Streed explained the District' s cash flow projections were based on several assumptions. Scenario 2 of the uAction Plan", which recommends continuation of the current treatment levels under the 301(h) waiver, is the staff's preliminary preferred alternative recommendation. It represents the minimum probable level of construction, operation and maintenance costs. For the first five years of the planning period, the differences between Scenarios 2 and 3 (full secondary treatment) would not be significant. Additional flow and sewer connection assumptions are also consistent with the Master Plan. With regard to connection fees, the Master Plan Financial Plan recommends a change in the method of determining connection fees. The recommended change, which Mr. Streed indicated was incorporated in the cash flow projections, is to Include the cost of future facilities on a per-unit basis. The reason for including these casts is that the Districts currently operate near capacity and any new flow will require new facilities. He noted that a determination would E� made by the Board after a decision is made on the permit renewal application and any revised connection fees would probably be effective October 1, 1989, when the residential connection fee is projected to be $2,260 under Scenario 2. -2- ' 6/01/89 DISTRICT 1 He further reported that Over the next 10 years COP-type borrowing totaling $80 million is projected to be needed to meet joint works treatment and District sewer capital requirements. He indicated that a more detailed analysis would be �..d performed and presented to the Directors before any debt is Issued. The cash flow projections are for several small issues on the theory of borrowing as little as possible and only when absolutely necessary. All issues are assumed to be at a fixed rate of 8% for 20 years. It was pointed out that the Health and Safety Code permits user fees to repay debt; and as the only controllable source of revenue for the District, they are projected for use to repay the necessary new debt. Existing debt continues to be repaid from capital funds. The Board then entered into a general discussion of the District's financial situation and the alternatives for funding the District's needs. Directors questioned whether any of the other Sanitation Districts were in a position to loan money to District 1 rather than issue debt certificates. Staff reported that based on recommendations included In the Financial Plan of the new Master Plan, all of the Districts will have to go into the debt market. A desire to minimize borrowing and to build District reserves by other means was also expressed. The General Manager then reviewed the draft ordinance included with the agenda material which increases the supplemental user fees, as follows: Single-Family Multi-Family Comnercia/Industrial/ Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other Annual User Fee $45.00 per $27.00 per $32.00 per 1,000 sq. dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. Of building Staff reported that no change in the connection fee schedule was recommended at this time. After a final decision is made by the Boards regarding the NPDES Permit renewal , staff will present their recommendations to the Board relative to increasing the connection fees. The Directors commented that they would prefer to increase the connection fees gradually and build a reserve for their future facilities' requirements. Mr. Sylvester reiterated that the recommended change In the policy for computing connection fees would increase the fee from $1,50o to $2,260. Thereafter, the connection fee would probably increase 5% annually based on the construction cost index. He added that those projections are based on the assumption of Scenario 2, continuing with the current level Of treatment. If the Boards choose to go to Scenario 3, full secondary treatment, the current fee would increase to $2,500. Staff assured Directors that the connection fees would be escalated annually to keep pace with inflation. Actions re proposed Ordinance NO. 112 Firs t�reading�of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: rd nan0 1 ce No. 112 That proposed Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 112 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: -3- 6/01/89 DISTRICT 1 That Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111, be introduced and passed to second reading on June 14, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the Districts' administrative office. Making finding that adoption of Following a verbal report by the Ordinance No. 112 1s categorically General Counsel , it was moved, exempt per CEQA Guidelines seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 112 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273, in that the Ordinance establishes fees for operation and maintenance expenses of the District. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 6:14 p.m. , June 1, 1989. Secretary, Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California -4- . . . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING June 7, 1989 - 5:30 p.m. �..� 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the adjourned regular meeting of May 17, 1989, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Tom Mays, Chairman, Grace Winchell DIRECTORS ABSENT: Roger R. Stanton STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Secretary, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes and Gary G. Streed OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Conrad Hohener Update on long-range financial The General Manager reported that in program and consideration of 1987 the Board modified their long-range amendments to existing sanitary77 financial program and implemented a sewer service charges supplemental user fee to make up the shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and provide the additional financing necessary for bath operations and maintenance costs as well as major facilities' rehabilitation. User fees are charged to all properties connected to the sewer. Funds for facilities' expansion are currently provided from connection fees on new development paid by the developer. In 1986 the Board also considered the issuance of Certificates of Participation (COP's) to partially finance their share of the joint works construction at the treatment plants but the District 11 Board decided against this proposal . Mr. Sylvester then reviewed the current fee schedules of the District, as follows: Single-Family Multi-Family Commercia/Industrial/ Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other One-time Connection $1,500 per $1,500 per $300 per 1,000 sq. Fee dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building Annual User Fee $26.40 per $15.83 per $18.90 per 1,000 sq. dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building -I- 6/07/89 DISTRICT 11 He further reported that the Districts all have a separate industrial user fee billed annually by the Districts for users that place a higher demand on the Districts' sewerage system. The Acting Director of Finance then reviewed the District's financial projections/ for the next ten years. Based upon the Facilities' Master Plan and the Financial Plan recommendations contained in the 30-year "Action Plan" now under consideration by the Joint Boards, District No. 11 will exhaust its capital funds as soon as 1990. The "Action Plan" recommends that the District's share of the treatment plant construction and trunk sewer construction be financed by a combination of borrowing (i.e. , COP's) and increased connection fees. Debt retirement and escalating operating and maintenance costs would be paid by annually increasing the supplemental user fees. He noted that in the next few years the user fees may have to escalate at an accelerated pace to maintain the District's financial integrity. However, there are several unknowns that may have a major impact on the District's cash flow requirements. Staff reported that a considerable portion of the District's major funding shortfalls are for capital financing. Staff's projections assume that all construction projects proceed on schedule. Thus, the estimates can be considered "worst case" scenarios. However, the Districts continue to experience delays in major projects because of SCAQMD requirements. Further delays in these projects would also delay, or at least spread out, the need for capital funds. It was also pointed out that, conversely, as the Directors were aware, if the secondary treatment waiver is not renewed in 1990, the Districts' capital needs will increase substantially. All projections currently being submitted to the Directors assume the renewal of the Districts' 301(h) waiver permit. Mr. Streed explained the District's cash flow projections were based on several assumptions. Scenario 2 of the "Action Plan", which recommends continuation of the current treatment levels under the 301(h) waiver, is the staff's preliminary preferred alternative recommendation. It represents the minimum probable level of construction, operation and maintenance costs. For the first five years of the planning period, the differences between Scenarios 2 and 3 (full secondary treatment) would not be significant. Additional flow and sewer connection assumptions are also consistent with the Master Plan. With regard to connection fees, the Master Plan Financial Plan recommends a change in the method of determining connection fees. The recommended change, which Mr. Streed indicated was incorporated in the cash flow projections, is to Include the cost of future facilities on a per-unit basis. The reason for Including these costs 1s that the Districts currently operate near capacity and any new flow will require new facilities. He noted that a determination would be made by the Board after a decision is made on the permit renewal application and any revised connection fees would probably be effective October 1, 1989, when the residential connection fee is projected to be $2,260 under Scenario 2. He further reported that over the next 10 years COP-type borrowing totaling $54 million is projected to be needed to meet joint works treatment and District sewer capital requirements. He indicated that a more detailed analysis would be performed and presented to the Directors before any debt is issued. The cash flow projections are for several small issues on the theory of borrowing as little as possible and only when absolutely necessary. All issues are assumed t� be at a fixed rate of 8% for 20 years. -2- 6/07/89 DISTRICT 11 It was pointed out that the Health and Safety Code permits user fees to repay debt; and as the only controllable source of revenue for the District, they are projected for use to repay the necessary new debt. Staff reported that the projections assume that the Balsa Chica will annex to the District and that annexation fees in the amount of $3,020,000 will be received in 1989-90. However, if the annexation fees are not received in 1989-90, District No. 11 will probably have to accelerate its issuance of $30,000,000 in COP's from 1990-91 to 1989-90. Sufficient information is not available to the District at this time on the projected development of the Bolsa Chica to enable an estimate of connection fee revenues from this area. Any connection fees received would partially reduce the projected $54,000,000 estimated CDP's over the next 10-year period. The Board then entered Into a lengthy discussion of the District's financial condition and estimated fee schedules for the future. Considerable time was devoted to alternatives relative to financing the capital facilities requirements and a review of connection fees and the proposed development within the District's existing boundaries, as well as the anticipated annexation of the Bolsa Chica, and a fee structure that provides that new development pays the appropriate amount for sewerage system capacity. Staff reiterated that the current annexation fee and the proposed connection fee formula recommended by the Master Plan financial consultant assures that new development pays its fair share of existing and needed future facilities. The General Manager then reviewed the draft ordinance included with the agenda material which increases the supplemental user fees, as follows: Single-Family Multi-Family Commercia/Industrial/ Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other Annual User Fee $40.00 per $24.00 per $29.00 per 1,000 sq. dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building Staff reiterated that no change in the connection fee schedule was recommended at this time. After a final decision is made by the Boards regarding the NPDES Permit renewal , staff will present their recommendations to the Board relative to increasing the connection fees. Mr. Sylvester also reiterated that the recommended change in the policy for computing connection fees would increase the fee from $1,500 to $2,260. Thereafter, the connection fee would probably increase 5% annually based on the construction cost index. He added that those projections are based on the assumption of Scenario 2, continuing with the current level of treatment. If the Boards choose to go to Scenario 3, full secondary treatment, the current fee would increase to $2,500. Actions re proposed Ordinance No. 1109 First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance—Ro. 1109 That proposed Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. -3- 6/07/89 DISTRICT 11 Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1109 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading on June 14, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the Districts' administrative office. Makin findin that ado tion of Following a verbal report by the r nance No. 1109 is sate oricall General Counsel , it was moved, exempt per CEQA uidelines seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1109 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273, in that the Ordinance establishes fees for operation and maintenance expenses of the District. Approving Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for re ar&tion of Phase I Preliminary Pro ect sport for blater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Im rovements contract o. 11-1 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that the new sewerage facilities Master Pla0 report prepared for the Joint Districts as part of the "Action Plan" effort includes both the joint treatment and disposal facilities, as well as the sewer conveyance systems for each of the sanitation districts. In District 11 the consultants have found that Slater Avenue Pump Station and certain trunk sewer facilities will be deficient for meeting future short-term and long-term capacity requirements; the most notable deficiency being the Slater Avenue Pump Station. The long-term solution had been identified in previous master plan reports as the extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer from its present terminus at Golden West Street in Orange Avenue northwesterly through the Bolsa Chica area to Edwards Street at Slater Avenue. Under this plan a line extending easterly in Slater Avenue would relieve the Slater Avenue Pump Station, while a line extended north in Edwards Street would relieve the Springdale Street sewer collection facilities, all at an estimated cost of $21.9 million. The new master planning team reviewed this and other alternate ways to provide the needed sewer improvements. The alternatives included diverting a portion of the area tributary to the Slater Avenue Pump Station easterly to the Knott Interceptor, thereby reducing the quantity of flow through the Slater Avenue Pump Station at an estimated cost of $16.6 million; and rebuilding the Slater Avenue Pump Station at an estimated cost of $14.2 million. The latter is the most economical method. The Slater Avenue Pump Station is currently operating at or near capacity. With continuing development taking place within the drainage area served by 1- the pump station, a project to correct the projected deficiencies is urgentlg� needed. -4- 6/07/89 DISTRICT 11 The pending Master Plan recommends that the Slater Avenue Pump Station be rebuilt at essentially the same location. It appears that the station could best be built adjacent to the existing station on lands now owned by General Telephone (GTE). Three phases of work for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, are envisioned: Phase I includes preparation of a project report detailing the size and construction requirements of the pump station elevations and the trunk sewer improvements tributary to the station. The engineering documents will also provide the necessary data for acquisition of a site from GTE. Phase II will include preparation of detailed construction plans and specifications, and an addendum to the professional services agreement will be negotiated and presented to the Directors for consideration at a later date. Phase III will be the actual construction of the facilities. In February, staff recommended that the Board proceed with the Phase I work for preliminary engineering work in advance of the "Action Plan" completion and certification in order to ensure that District 11 can continue to provide adequate sewer service. The Board authorized solicitation of proposals for the Phase I work. Mr. Dawes reviewed the proposals received from John Carollo Engineers, Boyle Engineering Corporation and Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, and recommended approval of a professional services agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed $44,738.00. Mr. Dawes also noted that it is anticipated that engineering services for Phase II and Phase III will be negotiated upon completion of Phase I. This portion of the contract will be negotiated separately and presented to the Board for approval at that time. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: dated May 31, 1989 That the Staff Report dated May 31, 1989 re selection of engineering consultant for preparation of Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Approving Professional Services Moved, seconded and duly carried: Agreement with John Car-- ollo Engineers re contract No. 11-17 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 89-50-11, approving Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, on an hourly-rate `...� basis for labor plus overhead, plus fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $44,738.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -5- 6/07/89 = DISTRICT 11 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11�—J be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 6:44 p.m. , June 7, 1989. Secretary, doard of Directors County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California -6- BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 -� JOINT BOARDS AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14; 1989 - 7 :30 P .M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: DISTRICTS 2 & 3 (4) (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Laurann Cook of the City of Fountain valley from the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 2 and 3, and to receive and file Resolution No. 8297 seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows: Districts Active Director Alternate Director 2 5 3 James Neal George Scott DISTRICTS 3 6 6 (4) (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts and resolutions from the following re election of mayors, appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor) Agency District(s ) Active Director Alternate Director Costa Mesa 6 James A. wahner James M. Ferryman Sanitary District Huntington 3 Was Bannister* Peter Green Beach /�� Seal Beach 3 victor Grgas* Edna Wilson AGENDA ITEM NO. 39 - RE: BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON APPEAL CHAIRMAN POLIS : PRIOR TO OPENING HEARING: - I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE RICHARD MARSH, A PRINCIPAL IN THE LOS ANGELES LAW FIRM OF KNAPP, MARSH, JONES AND DORAN. - MR . MARSH WILL ACT AS THE COUNSEL TO THE BOARD FOR THE HEARING TONIGHT. - BEFORE WE OPEN THE HEARING, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MR. MARSH TO REVIEW THE PROCEEDINGS FOR CONDUCTING THE HEARING FOR THE DIRECTORS . AFTER OPENING THE HEARING: ( Item 39 ( a ) ( 1 ) ] - PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE EVIDENCE AND HEARING THE PRESENTATION BY REPRESENTATIVES OF BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON AND THE DISTRICT STAFF, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THAT THE DIRECTORS RECEIVE A BRIEF ORIENTATION OF THE DISTRICT' S TREATMENT PROCESS AND THE BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON SITE LOCATION. - MR . BLAKE ANDERSON, COULD YOU PLEASE PROCEED TO DO THAT . i .. 2 4 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER 3 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 10 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL ) Permit No. 3-1-143 11 OF BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON, INC. ) j FINDINGS 12 ) 13 14 1 . On February 15, 1989 , the District issued Permit 15 No. 3-1-143 ( "Permit" ) to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ( "Beatrice.. ) . 16 2. This Permit contains limits on the discharge of 17 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) as set forth therein. 18 3 . These BOD limits are in accord with previously developed 19 discharge limits applicable to industrial dischargers of dispropor- 20 tionately large amounts 'of BOD. 21 4. The SOD limits set forth in the Permit are necefsar i 22 � order to meet NPDES permit requirements and prevent^i^tarference 23i with the treatment processes of Plant No. 2. 24 5. The methodology of restricting the introduction of BOD 25 into Plant No. 2 as evidenced by the Permit is consistent with the 26 guidelines promulgated by EPA. 27 / 28 / 5450.2F1-1 - -- i A 1 6. The Permit was validly issued under the laws of the State 2 of California and the District' s Regulations For Use of District \� 3 Sewerage Facilities. 4 7 . The issuance of the Permit is exempt from the require- 5 ments of the California Environmental Quality Act because 6 - a) The issuance of this permit is not a project 7 or 8 b) If the issuance of the permit is determined to be a 9 project, it is categorically exempt under 14 Cal Code 10 of Regulations sections 15307 ; 15308 and 15321 . 11 8 . The classification which distinguishes Beatrice and other 12 high strength BOD dischargers from other users of the District' s 13 sewerage system is reasonable. 14 9• There are feasible methods by which Beatrice can obtain 15 the BOD levels set forth in the Permit. i 16 10. These methods can be implemented for costs which are 17 reasonable in light of all the circumstances prevailing. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, this Board does hereby deny the appeal of 19 Beatrice/Hunt-wesson, Inc. , does ratify the action taken by the 20 District staff in issuing Permit No. 3-1-143 and does confirm all 21 the provisions thereof. 22 23 24 25 26 27 �. 28 5450. 2F1-2/sa -- 2. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Clean Water Act") mandated the development by the U.S. EPA of a National Pretreatment Program designed to prevent the discharge to POTW's of pollutants which interfere with, pma through or are otherwise incompatible with the treatment facilities. (Clean Water Act, Section 307 (b) (c) .) The U.S. EPA has adopted a comprehensive national program regulating dischargers and establishing pretreatment standards and requirements for industrial users and mandating local POTW's to implement this program by adoption of their own pretreatment programs. (Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 403.) The Federal Pretreatment Regulations prohibit any user from introducing into any POTW, any pollutant, including BOD, which passes through or causes interference with the POTW's treatment processes or operations. (Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 4035(b)(4).) Both state and local law authorize the Districts to regulate Beatrice's BOD discharge into the sewer system. (California Government Code Section 54739; Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201, 2O8(B)(4)and 302.1(c).) The Districts complied with applicable federal, state and local regulations in developing the BOD discharge limitation policy. (Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 403.1, et seq.; California Government Code Section 54739; Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201 and 208(B) (4).) Locally established limits imposed upon individual industrial users should be preventative rather than reactive. The Districts have followed the express published guidelines of EPA for pretreatment regulation and implementation, by considering all relevant treatment plant and environmental information, together with sound engineering and scientific data in establishing the Districts' BOD discharge limits. (EPA Guidance Manual on Development and Implementation of Local Discharge Limitations Under the Pretreatment Program (Dec. 1987), Section 13.2.) v District's Ordinance No. 306 authorizes the District's staff to impose pretreatment and discharge limitations conditions on industrial users. (Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 302.1 and 302.2.) 302.1 Class I Permit Application A. . . . B. . . . C. Other information may be required to properly evaluate the permit application. After evaluation and acceptance of the data furnished, the District may issue a Class I wastewater discharge permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the District's system. 302.2 Class I Permit Conditions, Limitations and Stipulations that may be in Permit: A. Mass emission rates regulating incompatible pollutants; I Other provisions which may be applicable to insure compliance with all provisions of this Ordinance; K. Other terms and conditions determined by the Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the District's system. The Districts' past experience has established that excessive BOD discharges seriously threaten to both apes through and interfere with the operation of the Districts' wastewater treatment plants and jeopardize the Districts' 301(h) waiver in its NPDES permit. (Declaration of D. Jenkins, pp. 3-5; Declaration of R. von Langen, p. 13.) Beatrice has the ability to implement procedures to significantly reduce BOD discharges even without construction of a pretreatment facility. (Declaration of K. Christensen, pp. 2-3; Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 16-17.) Beatrice will be able to efficiently operate a pretreatment facility on a seasonal basis. (Declaration of D. Jenkins, pp. 5-6; Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 15-16.) .� In peak season, Beatrice's BOD discharge is twice the amount generated by the total population of the City of Fullerton. (Declaration of R. von Langen, "Local Limits Review for Biochemical Oxygen Demand", p. 12, Exhibit "A".) In peak season, Beatrice's discharge of BOD increased approximately 18% between 1984 and 1987. Without the Districts' BOD limitations, in peak season, Beatrice and other high volume BOD dischargers would cause violations of the Districts' NPDES permit limits. (Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 3, 13- 14.) Since 1974, the Districts have spent over $300 million, and over the next 10 years, will spend $1 billion to expand and improve the Districts' treatment facilities. (Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 14-15.) Without enforcement of the Districts' BOD policy, the Districts will be required to expend $22 million in capital costs for construction of treatment facilities merely to treat Beatrice's BOD discharges. (Declaration of S. Hough, p. 6.) The Districts' action to issue a permit with conditions to protect the environment, is not a "project", but even if it were, the action is exempt from compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). (California Code Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15307, 15308 and 15321.) REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN JUNE 14, 1989 1) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - TENTATIVELY, THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28TH AT 5:00 P.M. B. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28TH AT 5:30 P.M. ( INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: ) RA CHELL N AND EDWARD ALLEN - OR - (WES BANNISTER) yS Air �F'5 �./ -END OF REPORT- -1- AGENDA ITEM 38: RECESS ANNOUNCEMENT WE WILL TAKE ABOUT A 5-MINUTE RECESS NOW TO SET UP FOR THE DISTRICT 3 HEARING. WE WOULD ASK THAT ALL DISTRICT 3 DIRECTORS MOVE TO THE CENTER TABLES IN THE FIRST TWO ROWS FOR THE HEARING. IF YOU ARE NOT A DISTRICT 3 DIRECTOR BUT WISH TO STAY FOR THE HEARING. PLEASE ALLOW THE DISTRICT 3 DIRECTORS TO MOVE TO THE FRONT CENTER TABLES. WE WILL RECONVENE IN 5 MINUTES. METING DATE June 16, 1989 TIME 7:30 ).m. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7. 11. 13 a Ib DISTRICT I JOINT BOARDS �n�r (CRANK)........HANSON....... (VERELLEN).........ALLEN....... (YOUNG)........GRISET......7 (GREEN)............BANNISTER... (KENNEDY)......HOESTEREY...A/ (WEDAA)............BIGONGER.... <POTH).........ST.NTON..... (NORBY)............CA TLIN......I \ (HAFT).............COX..........X_ 4 DISTRICT 2 (PERRY)............CULLER...... (KENNEDY)..........EDGAR....... � <NORBYI........CATLIN...... ✓ (YILSON)...........MNRO.......y_ _ (GRAHAM).......MAHOMEY.....� _ _ (CHESSEN)..........GRIFFIN..... V V (WEDAA)........BIGONGER....� (YOUNG)............GRISET...... V y_ (YOUNG)........GRISET...... ✓ (CRANK)............HANSON...... (NELSON).......•BMfiS........ JG (KENNEDY)..........HOE STEREY... (S[OTi)........NEUL........�G (NELSON)...........61MMP,...... (DOWNEY).......NEWTON....... ( )............KANEL.......� -V— (CULVER).......PERRY....... (EDGAR)............KENNEDY......Y--- _71 (HUNTER).......PICKLER...... (GRAHAM)...........MAHONEY..... 4 V (FASBENDER)....SILIEL...... (SILVA)............MAYS........ (BARRERA)......SMITH....... (SCOTT)............NEAL........ (ROTH).........STUNTON....._ (WEDIN)............NE LSD....... L (DOWNEY)...........NEWTON...... DISTRICT } (HUNTER)...........PERRY....... (HUNTER)...........PICKLER..... (DUDE).........POLLS ......JG ( UK ).............PLUMMER..... L (VEDIN)........ALLEN.......JG _ (DUKE)STNTON)..........ROTH. (GREEN)........BANNISTE ...�_ �_ (ATANT)............ROT......... (GREEN)........CATLIS......_G = (WILES)............SSEPIOAN.... (MERRY)........CUTLER...... A/ (MILES)............SIEFEN...... (PERRY)........CULVER......�G (FRSBENDER)........SILIEL...... (WILSON).......BABMl.......� (BURRERU)..........SMITH. ...... (CHESSEN)......GRIFFIN..... / (ROTH).............STANTON..... �O,n (YDUNG)........GR15E T...... _ (HART/BIN('.........9MIIIMRl..... _ ( )........KANEL.......JG (MILLER)...........SWAN........ (GRAM MI.......MAXONEY....• L (WWHLSTROM)........SYLVIA......� L (SCOTT)........NEAL........ ? (FERRYMAN/GREEN)...MANNER...... v_ (HUNTER).......PICKLER.....JL (BICONGER).........WEDAA....... (WILES)........SIEFEN...... (ISLES)............WEDIN....... (ROTH).........STANTON..... (BANNISTER)........WINCHELL.... (WAHLSTROM)....SYLVIA......JG DISTRICT 5 �� STAFF: SYLVESTER... Lt (HART).........COX......... . _ — BROWN.......JL (HART).........STRPM...... y— ANDERSON....JL (STANTON)......ROTH........ �_ CLARKE......J� CLAWSON.....JG DISTRICT 6 DAWES....... v . _ FILECCIA.... (FERRYMAN).....MANNER...... V Y HODGES......JG_ (HART).. .PLUMEN..... KYLE........� (STA.TON...... ROTH.. ..... LINGER......JG OOTEN.......JG DISTRICT 7 STREED......JL VON LANGEN J� (BARRERA)......SMITH.......y WINSOR...... (KENNED. ......EDGAR.......JC (YOUNG)........GRISET...... (STANTON)......ROTH........ �wLLQJiAA{Wi,�. (AGRAH)........SHERIDAN....JC (COX)..........RRRCST.....�G (GREEN)........YAHMER......,K _ _ O p" T HERS: MOOERU .... ✓ M,.X�.�Vga WI/14L.,. DISTRICT 11 IDS........... AO ANWAR....... (SILYA) . MAYS........ DEMIR ......__(GC Q A,, 4(B.NN1iTER) YINCNELL.... FLEMING..... (ROTH).........ST HOHENER.....J aQVHDUGX.. 'DISTRICT 13 HOWWRD......JC Q . 4 ,Ao .�. HUNT........_ (BICONCER).....XEDUA....... KNOPF....... V` (HUNTER).......PI CKLER..... LINDSTROM..._ a 4 (STANTON)......RO TH........ LYNCH....... SVI.)L (ISLES).)......SMITH....... STONE........ � DISTRICT 16 (ISLES)........YEDlN........ �_ STONE......._ `Y 1�O1w+Ww^ YOUNG......._ d� Q (MILLER).......SWAM........ �9�LL'yC (EDCUR)........NENNEDY..... N).(STRNTO .....LOTH........_ , w, ,Sl(NGRRN)........SHERIDAN.... ✓ (BARRERA)......WITH.......J/ 06/14/89 C• -�� PLEASE SIGN IN June 14, 1989 Board Meeting \� NAME AGENCY/FIRM JVA^ /rtGGr Oc5! 0 el (is'r'q �7 r` `,V 7A nN D A I-L i V1U?;Vvf 04-L ( AUp 5 52 /��/C��vfJ'FS/�r�ri/X�nx�) /c-ea4ke7�L �C•,Q/`/i�F F d 1-I o dges `l �S�l W /ems /7 d.'A�• C!�S�a•:�j _� bt.(j &A/L r2_ p _9,tATR-tct 6d �G U461141 �uQ �BG7LT C TIIOM(4-S /I�N.xv/rrn�G 4/u�sr�,mrts C/E�3/h-�� el,� / 1 ° Sl�aar � Z— l�rb .rnr .Vvn,. 4l,r�rf"�/j 6-14-89 JOINT MEETING NOTES &6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman The Joint Chairman announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee was tentatively scheduled to meet on Wednesday, June 28th, at 5:00 p.m. He then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, June 28th, at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Wes Bannister and Roland Bigonger to attend. /6(b) - Report of the General Manager The General Manager reported that the Districts were the recipient of AMSA's Gold Award because we have met all NPDES Permit requirements. They also received EPA's Award of Excellence for the last two years. Staff is quite proud of these achievements and are able to accomplish these things because of the Boards' support. Smith commented that the Directors are very proud of staff. Mr. Sylvester requested that the Directors' return the form included in some of their folders with regard to their attendance at the upcoming workshops on the Action Plan. N6(c) - Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported that there would be a closed session under Agenda Item No. 16 concerning a matter of possible litigation. He also noted with regard to Item 12, the Districts just received a couple hours ago a letter of protest relating to the bid on Job No. PI-34-2. He recommended that the matter be deferred until the next regular Board meeting in July in order to give his office an opportunity to investigate the matter. I7 - Approval of minutes Director Catlin commented on the May 17th Minutes of the Joint Adjourned Meeting. He said they were exceptionally well done and commended staff for an excellent job. ill - Nominations for Joint Chairman Director Griffin nominated Ronald B. Hoesterey for Joint Chairman. It was moved, seconded and duly carried that nominations be closed. #12 - Award of Job No. PI-34-2 Joint Chairman Smith reiterated that the staff recommended that this item be continued to the next regular meeting in July since there as been a protest received regarding it. It was so moved and seconded to do so. N14(b)(3) re budget Director Hart asked what the total budget amount was. Gary Streed replied that this was just two parts of the budget and the individual District budgets would be submitted to the Boards also. The total of the two is $ 816(a) - CLOSED SESSION The Boards convened in closed session at 7:50 p.m. regarding a matter involving possible litigation. They reconvened in regular session at 8:03 p.m. M39 - DISTRICT 3 re Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. Richard Marsh, of the Los Angeles law firm of Knapp, Marsh, Jones and Doran, who was acting as Special Counsel to the Board for the hearing, briefly reviewed the proceedings for conducting the hearing . He stated that the purpose of the hearing was to consider appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. Appeal is from the decision of the General Manager to issue Permit No. 3-1-143 on February 15, 1989. Appeal procedure is provided in District Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities. Hearing Procedure is also in accordance with Rules on Appeal adopted by the Board. shall be given to file certain documentary evidence on behalf of BeatrTc_er_a_n3 Districts' staff. The hearing is being conducted based on basis of written statements and contentions of both parties. Beatrice has submitted declarations of James N. Williams, Robert C. Thomas and John Baird. The Districts' staff has submitted under penalty of perjury, declarations by Richard W. von Langen, Stephen C. Hough, David Jenkins, Kelly Christensen and Blake Anderson. These declarations and exhibits attached to declarations, together with oral testimoney, constitute the record upon whish this Board should case its decision. Beatrice has also filed a request to cross examine each of the individuals who filed declarations on behalf of the Districts. The issue before the Board is whether or not this Board should grant the appeal or reaffirm staff's decision on permit limits and deny appeal. With regard to Rules on Appeal , this Board is not bound by any technical information. Heresay is admissable to support evidence that is otherwise supported in the record. Each party can make opening and closing statements. Following conclusion of statements, this Board should undertake deliberation in open session. Chairman Polis stated that he wanted to clear the record on one item with regard to a letter from Mr. Blodget wherein he made reference to the fact that staff had not sent out all documents to Directors. Director Polis stated that staff had been sending everything to him. (a) Opened hearing at 8:28 p.m. (1) Blake Anderson gave the Directors a brief presentation on the historical background of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. and the Beatrice site location. He also gave a brief orientation on the Districts' treatment process and the Beatrice site location. He explained terminology such as BOO (biological oxygen demand) which is a measure of strength of the wastewater. He added that bacteria require oxygen to live. Also reviwed suspended solids or non-dissolved material versus dissolved material. He reviewed the diagrams on the wall showing the various steps in the Districts' treatment processes: Primary Treatment - Secondary Treatment; 1/3 of flow receives secondary treatment. Plant 1 and Plant 2 effluent goes out to the ocean after having received primary and partial secondary treatment. Districts are under permit by EPA and State of California. Requirements for BOD have become increasingly stringent. Influent BOO is 500,000; effluent is 300,000. We are down to 180,000. We need to constantly remain below permit limits. -2- Since 1978 have added 101 mgd in primary treatment and 121 mgd in secondary. Within the next five years, will need an additional 60 mgd primary and 44 mgd secondary treatment. The 30-year Master Plan indicates a need for 400 mgd capacity. He stated that it is the Districts' intention to remain in compliance �..i constantly with regulations imposed by EPA and State of California. One part of the story is industrial source control which (1) Prevents the pass-through of untreated BOD to the ocean. We have limited the amount of soluable BOB because only a portion is treated with secondary treatment; and (2) Protects the secondary part of the treatment plant. Bacteria culture has to have optimum conditions to provide proper treatment. If there is a major change in sewage content, we don't get performance we need to. The secondary part of the plant is a living, breathing organism and must be stable. Mr. Anderson then showed an aerial video of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson's facilities. (7) (8:43 p.m.) Joel Moskowitz of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. stated that for the record, the Districts' staff has not asked to cross examine their representatives but they are here if they wish to. Said he wanted to make two points. What has happened to Beatrice here in this new permit is to restrict them from 40,000 lbs. to 26,700 lbs. with three months just before canning season. Beatrice is the same. It hasn't grown. There are seasonal variations. The reason why this restriction is being placed on Beatrice is to accommodate growth that moved into the County. That is why. We suggest that you go to your old users and say that they have to move out of town or partially shut down operations and spend millions of dollars. Unfair to ask Beatrice to do this. Even if it were fair and reasonable to spend $4 million to accommodate growth, to ask us just three months before canning season is now fair. We need to address the interim limits. Can't build a plant in three months. It is unfair to ask us to partially shut down and lay off employees. Isn't fair. He then stated he would like to cross examine Districts' staff. He then cross examined Rich von Langen. Tom Woodruff responded to cross examination also. (9:27 p.m.) Moskowitz then cross examined Kelly Christensen (9:44 p.m.) ; Steve Hough (9:51 p.m.) ; Blake Anderson (10:06 p.m.); and David Jenkins (10:24 p.m.) RECESS called from 10:25 to 10:40 p.m. Then finished cross examination of David Jenkins. Moskowitz closing statement. The real concern of Beatrice is that they have to take $4 million and became Orange County Sanitation Districts. What worries me is if they have to build a treatment plant in the middle of a residential neighborhood. If we can't build this plant, we can't run. They don't have to consider CEQA. We do. If we can't get this thing done, then the days of the plant are numbered. In 30-year plan will charge another $2 million. We have been here since the beginning. Not complaining about additional money. This particular project is senseless to build an satellite anerobic treatment plant in a residential neighborhood. The Districts already have one and we don't. If we can't get the thing permitted, we are gone. Orange County is the fastest growing area in the country. You have to shoulder the load of new growth. Not opposed to contribution. We haven't changed. Shouldn't ask us to do this. -3- Re big issue of anerobic plants, you can't let them do it to us this canning season. We have to cut back 30%. We have contracted with tomatoe growers. Don't mind paying a lot of money. This short-range thing to cut back by 1/3 isn't right and we can't do it without partial shutdown of our operation. Are asking you not to do that. What kind of operation do you want in the long term? Don't think you can get an anerobic treatment plant in a neighborhood. The air quality permit could take 211 years. In the long-run this just isn't going to happen. Thank you. (10:50 p.m.) Tom Woodruff then presented his closing statement. He stated that his job now is not to put in any more evidence. I have prepared Items of Evidence and declarations of staff and consultants and that document really says the whole case. Would like to summarize what we have put forward and what the issues really are and why what the staff has done is only right and fair and is fully authorized under the provisions of law and fully in accordance with what is necessary for the overall wellbeing of this District, and more particularly, the 2 million residents and businesses, both commercial and industrial , that are served by the Districts and the hundreds and thousands of other people who must use the marine offshore facilities for fishing and sailing and boating to ensure that the environment is at all times protected in accordance with policies established and enforced by the Districts for many many years. Said he had prepared a summary of remarks which he displayed on an overhead projector while he reviewed them. (SEE ATTACHED LISTING) TLW advised that negotiations with Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson weren't new. Referred to 1985 letter telling them that we are experiencing BOD problems and the Districts were going to be mandating the reduction of their limits. There has been this dialogue for many months conducted on a high professional level between the engineering and technical people. Said he got involved also when the thing started to heat up. He thought the Directors had been unfairly disparaged in the last couple weeks with a lot of misinformation going to them. Re requiringy a satellite treatment plant, 356 other industries have spent from $25,000 to 55 million to build pretreatment facilities. The issues were dollars and when they filed the appeal , they have filed a lot of challenges. With regard to Beatrice's contention that the District has no legal basis to impose these limits, Mr. Woodruff began listing the federal laws and District ordinances mandating these actions. (See attached report, pages 1 and 2) He added this is simply a sham to say that this District doesn't have authority just because there is no 10,000 lb. number in the Ordinance. The original universe was Anaheim Citrus and then we received information from IPT. Geographically, that is outside the District but in 1972 the District entered into an agreement with SAWPA and they have ownership of capacity rights for 30 mgd. IPT is within their service area and they have all the legal right to be here. Contractually, they are within the Districts. The authority is key. We comply with all legal requirements. Beatrice understood obligations and chances are for this year there will probably only be one month in 1989 that they will have to do something out of the ordinary. May have to bring it to the Districts. They are now playing on your sympathies saying that they are going to shut down. Have had all sorts of planning and warnings. As indicated by Dr. Jenkins, they can operate a pretreatment facility. They could come down here and get a starter for their anerobic plant from the Districts. You would think this was some beautiful garden. There are v -4- residences on the easterly boundary. An airport on the western boundary. Hughes factory to north and hundreds of acres of industries including refineries. This is an industrial park. The treatment plant in the middle of a residential community is not the case. The residential area is 15-20 feet below o..i grade which doesn't protect them against odors but does protect them against noise, etc. He referred to charts and District map and City of Fullerton location. They say let us send down the pipe all that we generate because it the growth in Orange County that is causing this. There is growth in Orange County. We have built expansions in both primary and secondary treatment. This District has the responsibility to provide treatment for all areas and for new growth. Re BOD graph we were ordered by EPA to cut amount of BOD to 1/2 from 377,000 lbs. to 187,000 lbs. We didn't like it but have to do it. The philosophy of this District is that we protect them all--land, air and water. In the peak season we are operating facilities close to full. We can't operate at red line but don't have a lot of room. When the decision relative to limits for Anaheim Citrus, the parent company, Farley Industries, said that their capital investment exceeded their net worth. It is not an undue obligation we are putting on them. Re CEQA requirements, this is a legal plant. If they choose to build a treatment plant, we have set the schedule and they will have to go to City Hall and maybe they will have a CEQA issue. We are only concerned with the flow of the liquid coming down the pipe and conditions related to it. There are many other concerns. I think the thrust of this is that they say they are unduly being singled out. They are doing nothing different. They may not be handling any more tomatoes. Maybe it Is mutations, don't know. Whatever is happening, they are sending us a lot more BOD but they will not do anything about it. That is the whole issue. They have got to step with the rest of their fellows in the industries out there. Whether they are plating industries or printed circuit manufacturers, our concern is BOD discharge. Beatrice has other industries in Orange County. They operate a plant in Santa Ana. They are not now in compliance with EPA. With regard to air emissions, is the water any less important to protect? Of course not. They can handle it. With the limit of 27,600 lbs., maybe will have one month that they can do something. I think the Board is familiar enough with all of this to know what has to be done to protect the Districts and the environment. In closing, referred to Ordinance 306 for District No. 3 which is part of the record that we are operating under. Also referred to the Districts' discharge permit of 1985 from EPA. Indicated it was available to read. We have specific sanctions and authorization for imposing these conditions. Nothing further to say. (11:20 p.m.) Director Catlin asked if any industries were to come in and add a large plant, would the Districts be obligated to take it or would they give them the same type of conditions? Blake replied that we wouldn't allow them to discharge over the 10,000 lb. per day limit. Question asked, why would one industry be singled out? Should we have the same type of thing for residences? BPA answered, an individual discharger does not impose the variations in BOD strength as a food processor does. We have to tried to be as practical as we can. Larger dischargers could more adequately operate a system like this. Wouldn't advise getting down to smaller industries. Catlin asked, if the size of other industries exceed the limit, would you a./ restrict them also? He was told yes but Beatrice and two others are in a class by themselves. He added that we might change the category sometime in the future to 5,000-10,000 lbs. -5- Asked, what about large restuarants, such as Knott's Berry Farm? If they were discharging greater than 10,000 lbs. per day, perhaps would need to limit them also. .... Is there a place in Orange County where we can't accept any more residences because of BOD? Answered, no, we are constructing new facilities to take care of those demands. Director Griset noted that reference was made earlier to the cost if Beatrice was to undertake pretreatment facilities. Is $4 million a good estimate? Rich von Langen replied that that was an estimate we received from someone who has been to the site. If we didn't limit their BOD, the Districts would be required to spend $22 million merely to treat Beatrice's BOD discharge. Steve Hough added that if the District were to receive this waste and have to treat it in order to reduce the 40,000 lbs. of BOD, it would require 15 mgd capacity which has an estimated capital cost of E22 million. Griset suggested it would be prudent to spend $4 million to avoid paying E22 million in Huntington Beach. We seem to be having a great deal of BOD growth in this District. We have a contributor to the BOD problem whose amount is stable. In fact, this service area is growing in BOD content. Steve Hough replied that the 40,000 lbs. is diluted by wastewater so we don't treat 5 mgd, have to treat 15 mdg. Would be cheaper for them to build a pretreatment plant. Catlin commented that in absolute amounts, this industry has a reasonably stable amount of BOD over the past five years. Has increased 18%. We are not as concerned over the percentage of increase of this user compared to the growth as a whole, is that correct? Blake answered, in terms of soluble BOD, it is not quite true. We can't trace down what pump, etc. is causing the problem. Beatrice has paid $1.7 million in operations and maintenance costs and $1 million in capital replacement. This doesn't provide full cost to treat their wastewater. They have not been singled out. Have been doing quite well with us over the last few years. Director Allen asked what type of response we received when we offered to take their excess by truck? Rich replied we didn't receive any response. We offered but no response. Pickler asked if this appeal is denied, what will they do? Tom Woodruff replied that he would like to think they would come in and sign their permit and continue as a good neighbor. If they choose not to, we will see them in court. This is the last step here. Question asked, does the District have the right or power to force them to stop causing the problem with BOD? TLW answered, I would recommend that this Board adopt a position that we place them on notice that in fact we are going to hold them to the schedule. If they win, we will address it then. If they lose, we would expect to hold them to this time limit. When 1991-92 comes around they may end up trucking a lot of waste because they will be at the 10,000 lb. limit. Very strongly urged that the Board adopt that position. Said to Board, you have to make that decision. -6- Polls asked Dr. Jenkins re odors associated with anaerobic plants. Is there a way of substantially cutting down this odor where you wouldn't be offended over the smell of the tomatoes. Ripening will be continuing within the tanks. This smell would probably be better than that. Dr. Jenkins said he has visited other anaerobic plants and they have operated with substantially odor-free conditions. Polls also commented that two figures were given re amount of land needed for anaerobic plant, which one is right--2 acres or .7 acres? He was told the estimate made by Beatrice was for 2 acres. Our estimate was from two equipment vendores based on information we had on record. Disparity could be engineering judgment or it could be that Beatrice was planning to locate about one mile away from where we chose and pipe cost could then be E1-91 million. Figure is closer to the .7 acres. Catlin commented on results of CSDOC industrial pretreatment program which is the basic element of Orange County's successful industrial treatment program. It started in July 1976. In July 1978 we requested installation of pretreatment facilities to maintain California Ocean requirements re Phase III additional facilities. This indicates a knowledge that this type of program was in progress. Were the industries in O.C. involved in that study? TLW replied that the last three ordinances, in 1976, 1983 and the one coning up next month, all worked with industries. The new ordinances was revised 23 or 24 times. Took us 18 months to do that ordinance. The industrial sector and ad hoc committee participated with staff here to talk about limitations on metals, pollutants, etc. Rich von Langan added that Mr. Baird participated in the last revision. Catlin asked, was this general knowledge within the industries? Rich answered yes. Griset asked if the Board acts here to deny their appeal and Beatrice were to comply and build this treatment facility, is it your understanding that they would need to go to the Fullerton City Council to get certain approvals for this facility? TLW indicated that he couldn't say for certain. It is a 63-acre site. I expect it is subject to existing land use permits from the City. Whether they would require additional permits I don't really know. This is just one more piece of equipment and would be processed as part of their overall operation. In terms of approval re CEQA, would have to get City to sign off or say no impact or may need to prepare an EIR. Griset then asked if City would not authorize such a facility, does this Board have the authority to mandate the construction of this facility over objections of City Council? Answered, no, I don't believe so. Director Kanel comnented he had the race track in his City. They don't make them come before the Council every time they make a change. Said I believe that is an industrial plant and they would be adding more machinery. Just bigger machinery. This whole thing is affecting the entire Districts. I don't see why a big corporation like this is not complying and doing what should be done. I would be ready to deny their appeal. Pickler(?) MOVED to deny appeal . Motion SECONDED. Special Counsel Marsh then suggested some findings that should be included in motion and that the motion should read as follows: (1) On February 15, 1989, the District issued Permit No. 3-1-143 ("Permit") to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ("Beatrice"). (2) This Permit contains limits on the discharge of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOO) as set forth herein. -7- (3) The BOD limits are in accord with previously developed discharge limits applicable to industrial dischargers of disproportionately large amounts of BOD. (4) The BOD limits set forth in the Permit are necessary in order to meet NPDES Permit requirements and prevent pass-through interference with the treatment processes of Plant No. 2. (5) The methodology of restricting the introduction of BOD into Plant No. 2 as evidenced by the Permit is consistent with the guidelines promulgated by EPA. (6) The Permit was validly issued under the laws of the State of California and the District's Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities. (7) The issuance of the permit is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act because (a) The issuance of this permit is not a project or (b) If the issuance of the permit is determined to be a project, it is categorically exempt under 14 Cal Code of Regulations Sections 15307; 15308 and 15321. (8) The classification which distinguishes Beatrice and other high-strength BOD dischargers from other users of the Districts' sewerage system is reasonable. (9) There are feasible methods by which Beatrice can obtain the BOD levels set forth in the Permit. (10) These methods can be implemented for costs which are reasonable in light of all the circumstances prevailing. Now, therefore, this Board does hereby deny the appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ; does ratify the action taken by the District staff in issuing Permit No. 3-1-143; and does confirm all the provisions thereof. Director Catlin commented that he had examined all the this material very carefully. I have read every word and heard everyone. Said he asked himself, has the District staff and Board proceeded with administrative due process (?) in setting limits? Does the Boards have approved ordinances and can you do this? Does the industrial user of the wastewater system have a grandfathered right to discharged under past standards? Don't think so. Do we have authority to establish permit limitations that might create an economical problem? I think the Districts have a mandate, as well as a moral obligation, to protect the environment. That is the community responsibility. We have an obligation to meet the standards. There has to be a start somewhere to preserve the environmental integrity. Don't think Districts should be guided by lesser standards of other POTW's. It is hard to believe that a professional organization with expertise and knowledge of wastewater industries would not have their ear to the ground a long time ago. I can't believe Beatrice doesn't know what is going on. I think we have the responsibility to take the leadership in this. I speak for the motion that has been made. CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. Griset added, what I am looking for is equity--if we could agree on what is an equitable allocation of costs would be for each of the systems. How do we -8- schedule those impacts? What I have heard from Beatrice is what are they going to do with business arrangements in the next few weeks. I wonder what this decision will do re immediate impacts. Does this reflect a process we can be proud of? I can't immediately respond to this motion. Each of us needs to pay our way. Siefen commented that they acted on five ordinances that night increasing fees. The people I represent are having to look at increased costs. We have people who are contributing to the growth. I don't think we will get any results this year but we have to start. Everybody in this District is trying to pay their own way and looking forward to the future. I vote for the denial . CALLED FOR THE QUESTION AGAIN. Griffin stated, I am inclined to think, through what I have heard this evening, that staff, in fact, will continue to exercise cooperation and its willingness to allow for a reasonable transition to the ultimate final decision. Don't think any of us have any idea of what the final design will be. There is certainly competent and professional people on both sides. Polis noted that the question had been called for. ROLL CALL VOTE on motion including findings and wording suggested by Special Counsel . MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned 11:55 p.m. -9- The Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Clean Water Act") mandated the development by the U.S. EPA of a National Pretreatment Program designed to p=n the discharge to POTW's of pol through or are otherwise incompatible with (Clean Water Act, Section 307 (b) (c) 7 ? The U.S. EPA has adopted a comprehens dischargers and establishing pretreatment standards and requirements for industrial users and mandating local POTW's to implement this program by adoption of their own pretreatment programs. (Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 403.) The Federal Pretreatment Regulations prohibit any user from introducing into any POTW, any pollutant, including BOD, which passes through or causes interference with the POTW's treatment processes or operations. (Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 4035(b)(4).) r.. Both state and local law authorize the Districts to regulate Beatrice's BOD discharge into the sewer system. (California Government Code Section 54739; Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201, 2O8(B)(4)and 302.1(c).) The Districts complied with applicable federal, state and local regulations in developing the BOD discharge limitation policy. (Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 403.1, et seq.; California Government Code Section 54739; Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201 and 208(B) (4).) Locally established limits imposed upon individual industrial users should be preventative rather than reactive. The Districts have followed the express published guidelines of EPA for pretreatment regulation and implementation, by considering all relevant treatment plant and environmental information, together with sound engineering and scientific data in establishing the Districts' BOD discharge limits. (EPA Guidance Manual on Development and Implementation of Local Discharge Limitations Under the Pretreatment Program (Dec. 1987), Section 1.3.2.) District's Ordinance No. 306 authorizes the District's staff to impose pretreatment and discharge limitations conditions on industrial users. (Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 302.1 and 302.2.) 302.1 Class I Permit Application A. . . . B. . . . C. Other information may be required to properly evaluate the permit application. After evaluation and acceptance of the data furnished, the District may issue a Class I wastewater discharge permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the Districts system. 302.2 Class I Permit Conditions, Limitations and Stipulations that may be in Permit: A. Mass emission rates regulating incompatible pollutants; J. Other provisions which may be applicable to insure compliance with all provisions of this Ordinance; K. Other terms and conditions determined by the Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the District's system. The Districts' past experience has established that excessive BOD discharges seriously threaten to both pm throughand interfere with the operation of the Districts' wastewater treatment plants and jeopardize the Districts' 301(h) waiver in its NPDES permit. (Declaration of D. Jenkins, pp. 3-5; Declaration of R. von Langen, p. 13.) Beatrice has the ability to implement procedures to significantly reduce BOD discharges even without construction of a pretreatment facility. (Declaration of K. Christensen, pp. 2-3; Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 16-17.) Beatrice will be able to efficiently operate a pretreatment facility on a seasonal basis. (Declaration of D. Jenkins, pp. 5-6; Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 15-16.) u .� In peak season, Beatrice's BOD discharge is twice the amount generated by the total population of the City of Fullerton. (Declaration of R. von Langen, Tocal Limits Review for Biochemical Oxygen Demand", p. 12, Exhibit "A".) In peak season, Beatrice's discharge of BOD increased approximately 18% between 1984 and 1987. Without the Districts' BOD limitations, in peak season, Beatrice and other high volume BOD dischargers would cause violations of the Districts' NPDES permit limits. (Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 3, 13- 14.) Since 1974, the Districts have spent over $300 million, and over the next 10 years, will spend $1 billion to expand and improve the Districts' treatment facilities. (Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 14-15.) Without enforcement of the Districts' BOD policy, the Districts will be required to expend $22 million in capital costs for construction of treatment facilities merely to treat Beatrice's BOD discharges. (Declaration of S. Hough, p. 6.) The Districts' action to issue a permit with conditions to protect the environment, is not a "project", but even if it were, the action is exempt from compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). (California Code Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15307, 15308 and 15321.) 1 `.✓ 2 3 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER 3 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 10 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL ) Permit No. 3-1-143 11 OF BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON, INC. ) FINDINGS 12 ) 13 i 14 1. On February 15, 1989, the District issued Permit 15 No. 3-1-143 ( "Permit" ) to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ( "Beatrice" ) . i 16 2. This Permit contains limits on the discharge of 17 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) as set forth therein. 18 3 . These BOD limits are in accord with previously developed 19 discharge limits applicable to industrial dischargers of dispropor- 20 tionately large amounts of BOD. 21 4. The BOD limits set forth in the Permit a ,a _ne3eAsar I 22 � order to meet NPDES permit requirements and prevent^i.^.�erference , 23 � with the treatment processes of Plant No. 2 . 24 � 5 . The methodology of restricting the introduction of BOD 25 into Plant No. 2 as evidenced by the Permit is consistent with the 26 guidelines promulgated by EPA. 27 / 28 / 5450.2F1-1 1 6 . The Permit was validly issued under the laws of the State (. 2 of California and the District's Regulations For use of District' i 3 Sewerage Facilities. I i 4 7 . The issuance of the Permit is exempt from the recuire- 6 ments of the California Environmental Quality Act because 6 a) The issuance of this permit is not a project 7 or 8 b) If the issuance of the permit is determined to be a 9 project, it is categorically exempt under 14 Cal Code 10 of Regulations sections 15307; 15308 and 15321 . 11 8. The classification which distinguishes Beatrice and other 12 high strength SOD dischargers from other users of the District' s 13 sewerage system is reasonable. 14 9. There are feasible methods by which Beatrice can obtain 15 the BOD levels set forth in the Permit. 16 10 . These methods can be implemented for costs which are 17 reasonable in light of all the circumstances prevailing. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, this Board does hereby deny the appeal of 19 Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. , does ratify the action taken by the 20 District staff in issuing Permit No. 3-1-143 and does ccrfirm all 21 the provisions thereof. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5450.2F1-2/sa 2• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JUNE 149 1989 Ppt1TATfON Y aaav°lava OOI,, O .l U � N Sloee 1954 NgryGE co ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on June 14, 1989. at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Foilwing the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a Quarum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as fell ws: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman —Dan Crank x Dan Griset, Chairman pro tan Dan Young x Ronald B. Hoesterey —Ursula Kennedy _L__Roger Stanton -Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: x A.B. -Buck- Catlin, Chairman _Chris Norby x Nil l tam 0. Mahoney, Chairman pro tan Beth Graham %Roland E. Bigonger —Henry W. Weiss x Oan Griset —Dan Young Ron Isles %Carrey Nelson 7—James Neal —George Scott %Arthur G. Newton —Carol Owney %Bob Perry Norman Culver %Iry Pickier Fred Hunter x Wayne Silzel —James T. Fasbender %Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera %Roger Stanton _Dan R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman Orbrey Duke %Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin %Edward L. Allen Paul Verellen x Wes Bannister —Peter Green %A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chria Norby %Norman Culver —Bob Perry %Don R. Griffin _—Donna L. Chessen x Dan Griset _Dan Young %John Kemal %william D. Mahoney am_Beth Grah z James Neal George Scott x Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter x J.R. -Bob- Siefen —_Owey wiles a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth %Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom %Edna Nilson _Victor Grgas DISTRICT NO. 5: x John C. Cox, Jr., Choi men Evelyn Hart Donald A. Strauss, Chairman pro tan %Evelyn Hart 7—Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman _James M. Ferryman x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tom Evelyn Hart a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Choi neon _Fred Barrera %Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tan Ursula Kennedy x Dan Griset —Dan Young a Dan R. Roth —Roger Stanton x Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran Donald A. Strauss %John C. Cox, Jr. x James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tom Mays, Chairman _Jim Silva x Grace Winchell, Choi roan pro tiesWes Bannister a Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth DISTRICT MD. 13: x Henry W. Macias, Chairmen Roland E. Bigonger %Iry Pickier, Chairman pro tem —Fred Hunter a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera %Wayne Wedin _Ron Isles DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller %Ursula Kennedy, Chairman pro in —Roger B. Edgar a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton %Sally Anne Sheridan _Larry Agran x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera -2- 06/14/89 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Bob Oaten, Rich von Langen, Jim Herberg, Dan Dillon, Stasia Allen, Mahin Talebi , Mike Deblieux OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark Ide, Richard Marsh, Thomas Nixon, Jamel Demir, Stephen Hough, Walt Howard, Phil Stone, Dewey Wiles, David Jenkins, Bob Finn, George A. Randall , Paul Dunning, John Baird, Joel S. Moskowitz, Gary Stetzel , Bill Blodgett, James N. Williams, Yvonne .. Castle, Robert C. Thomas DISTRICTS 2 8 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file an accept resigna- tion of Ma or Laurann Cook of the That the letter from Mayor Laurann Cook city of Fountain vaiiey and seating resigning from the Boards of Directors first and second alternates to the of District Nos. 2 and 3, be, and is Mayor hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be seated as members of the Boards: Districts Active Director Alternate Director ' 2 a 3 James Neal George Scott DISTRICTS 3 8 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute-excerpts re Boar ppointments That the minute excerpts and resolutions from the fallowing re election of mayors, appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) Agency District(s) Active Director Alternate Director Costa Mesa 6 James A. Wahner James M. Ferryman Sanitary District Huntington 3 Wes Bannister* Peter Green Beach Seal Beach 3 Edna Wilson Victor Grgas* ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that the Report of the Joint Chairman Fiscal Policy Committee was tentatively scheduled to meet on Wednesday, June 28th, at 5:00 p.m. Chairman Smith then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, June 28th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Wes Bannister and Roland Bigonger to attend and participate in the discussions. -3- 06/14/89 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the Report of the General Manager Districts were the recipients of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' Gold Award for 1988. This award recognizes the Districts' continuous compliance with all requirements of their National Pollutant Discharge Elmination System (NPDES) Permit. He noted that the Districts had also received the Environmental Protection Agency's Award of Excellence for the last two years. Mr. Sylvester commented briefly on the upcoming workshops for Directors on the Districts' "Action Plan" and requested that the Directors return the form provided to them indicating whether they would be attending one of the four workshops scheduled for the following week. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that the Report of the General Counsel Boards would convene in closed session later in the meeting concerning a matter involving possible litigation. Mr. Woodruff also advised that a letter of protest had been received that afternoon relative to the award of Job No. P1-34-2, Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Therefore, staff recommended that this matter be removed from this agenda and deferred to the next regular Board meeting in July in order to provide an opportunity for his office to investigate the matter. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Smith stated that the Deferring consideration of award staff and General Counsel had recommended of Job No. Pl-34-Z to Advanco that award of Job No. P1-34-2 be removed Constructors, Inc. from the agenda and deferred to the next regular meeting of the Boards on July 12 in order for the General Counsel 's office to investigate and comment on a letter of protest received relative to award of said job to Advanco Constructors, Inc. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That consideration of award of Job No. P1-34-2, Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, be, and is hereby, deferred to the regular meeting of the Boards of Directors on July 12, 1989. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and June 1, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 06/14/89 DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and May 31, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and May 31, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned - regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be _ deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of inutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and June 7, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chair an ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned regular meeting held May 179 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of a ent of Joint and Individual District uialms That payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 5/10/89 5/24/89 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Fund - $ 752,470.45 $ 836,257.06 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 4,616,703.09 525,145.87 Joint Working Capital Fund - 186,147.44 1589233.52 - Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 89550.72 6,356.25 DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 16.56 DISTRICT N .'1 - 257,299.64 36,338.50 DISTRICTS - 374,794.43 13,024.35 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 25,597.78 4,244.55 DISTRIC N - 10,895.43 32,146.04 _ DISTRICT - 100,294.96 26,428.67 DISTRICT NK.71 - 1,918.21 6,585.25 DI STRICT NO. 13 - -0- 4.08 DI5TRI� - 69,771.56 56,258.71 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 a 6 JOINT - 851,916.41 5,576.40 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 a 7 JOINT - -0- 35.42 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 689.14 2,785.27 7,257,049.26 51,70KTT670 -5- 06/14/89 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Twenty-Six our- ea"ur-wheal Electric uargo That the bid tabulation and arr ers ecITIca onE1 . A-=, recommendation re award of Purchase of o w. T. Biiiara, Lnc. Twenty-Six (26) Four-Wheel Electric cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-145, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to W. T. Bitlard, Inc. for the total amount of $116,220.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of One - on urane-mountea, FlatBed T ruck That the bid tabulation and ecif cation O. -14 o e recommendation re award of Purchase of Lee, Inc. One 2M-Ton Crane-Mounted, Flat Bed Truck, Specification No. A-147, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Ole Lee, Inc. for the total amount of $39,842.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: AuthorIzInq staff to issue Change rder No. 1 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, authorized No. 38042 issuedo Continental to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Graohics for additional printing Order No. 38042 Issued to Continental services re "Action Plan" Oraft Graphics for additional printing Collection, Treatment and Disposal services required to print "Action Plan'- Tacilities Master Plan Draft Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, increasing the total authorized amount from $41,500.00 to $49,443.70, including tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: rov n han e Order o. o e ons and specifications or That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and ob NO. - specifications for Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $29,180.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for 11 Items of additional work including flagpole illumination, substitution of aluminum expansion Joint screed Joints for platic screeds, additional electrical circuitry and ventilation ducting in kitchens; additional bathroom lighting soffits; and additional valves on HVAC system; and granting a time extension of 12 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chance Order No. 16 to the p1an5 and sec cat ons 'or That Change Order No. 16 to the plans Job No. J-1b and specifications for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, authorizing an addition of $36,700.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for 11 items of miscellaneous additional work including modification of locker-room showers and restrooms for handicapped persons; miscellaneous modifications to walkways and ladders; installation of safety handrail at termination channel ; modification of roof slope; installation of separate grounding for DACS computer control system and replacement of current breakers; removal of undisclosed underground obstructions; and installation of dryers in the air system and other miscellaneous changes; and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -6- 06/14/89 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: PproV n9 ange r er o. 1 o e ens and s ecif ca onsf� orb That change order No. 1 to the plans and , Job NO. J-ZU specifications for Warehouse and v Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an addition of $30,857.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for modifications to the water facilities inspection trench required by the City of Fountain Valley, and removal of unsuitable building foundation soil; and granting a time extension of 19 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving han e Order No. 18 t0 the pians and sec ca ons or That Change Order No. 18 to the plans Job NOS. an and specifications for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and - Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cieanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of - $82,028.20 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for eight items of additional work including removal of undisclosed obstructions; removal of temporary paving; additional chlorine piping in future bar screen channels; installation of a District-furnished influent pump; reinforcement modifications in Tunnel No. 4 at the bar screen and pump roam structures; substitution of wall panels at chlorine area to accommodate future storage tank changes; and modification of architectural finish to the building exterior concrete surfaces throughout, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovinqhen a Order o. 1 0 the ens and sec cations for That Change Order No. 13 to the plans • ob NOS. P1-n% ?I-Zb, P2- 1 and specifications for Covers for FZ-JJ and PZ-J4 Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A", Job No. P2-34, authorizing an addition of $98,811.72 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for four items of additional work including caustic pump power modifications; additional costs due to District-requested delays re modifications to "H" and uI" scrubbers to accommodate ongoing odor control operations; Improvements to the steam shunt piping system; and additional asphaltic concrete curb and trench paving; and granting a time extension of 121 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A roV n han a rder No. 14 to the ans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 14 to the plans ob Nos. P1-Zb, PI-ZbP - 1 and specifications for Covers for P -33 and P - 4 Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility 084, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A", Job No. P2-34, authorizing an addition of $96,311.08 to the contract with Advanco - Constructors, Inc. for five items of additional work including modifications to the Plant 1 scrubber complex drain; construction of concrete pad at diesel tank fueling areas at Building 4 at Plant No. 1 and removal of deteriorated asphaltic concrete paving; modifications to foul air ductwork at Headworks "C" to accommodate the new Conveyor Building; installation of methane sensors in each of . 17 primary basin dome enclosures; and rerouting of existing 10-inch digester cleaning line around the new 48-inch foul air line, be, and is hereby. approved. -7- 06/14/89 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovinq Chanqe Order No. 2 to the ans and sReciticatiEns for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Job NO. 1- 7 specifications for Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, authorizing a net addition of $26,462.14 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for eight items of miscellaneous additions and deletions including security fencing modifications; relocation of telephone conduit; existing manhole modifications and repairs; installation of concrete thrust block on waste hauler drain line; installation of restroom facility for the guard shack at the new main entrance; deletion of the Motor Control Center in the Metering and Diversion Structure; and deletion and modification of asphalt paving, concrete and piping at the Waste Hauler Dump Station, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: ADprovIn Change Order No. 2 to the tans ango s ecificat ons for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Job No. - 7 specifications for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing a net addition of $33,600.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for seven items of additional work including rerouting of existing gas and water lines at new meter structure "A"; modifications to new containment facility at dewatering building; increasing ball valve size from 6" to 8" for 20 valves for Digesters "A" and 08"-; deletion of a new catch basin which will be incorporated into a future project; rerouting high strength sludge piping and connections at Digesters "C", "D", "F" and "G"; and exploratory utility location excavation of underground high strength sludge piping system, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rov n Adden um No_ to e Profess onal Services reement That the Selection Committee with Brown and CaldwelyConsulting certification of the final negotiated n neers 0r des n o fee relative to Addendum No. 4 to the ob No. -1 Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for design of a steam turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of engine heat to produce additional electricity, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-51, approving Addendum No. 4 to said Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $68,972.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $3,592,838.00 to an amount not to exceed $3,661,810.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly-carried: A rov n Addendum No. to the Pro ess ona ervices A reement That the Boards of Directors hereby with ones 8 Stokes Associates, adopt Resolution No. 89-52, approving Inc. for preparation of EIR for Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Services Agreement with Jones a Stokes Element of Master Plan7rogrammatic Associates, Inc. for preparation of an R Environmental Impact Report for the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Element of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Programmatic EIR, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories �..r� within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $213,126.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -8- 06/14/89 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizino the a ec on omn ee o ne o late endum No. to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Profess ono ery ces reemen hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum with Lee and Ro onsu n No. 2 to the Professional Services FEn veersP1-re design a Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting ob o. Engineers for design of Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, to provide for relocation of the effluent junction box and polymer facility, realignment of Fuentes Road, and modifications to the equipment and scum trough hatches on the primary clarifiers. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager o desi rate members of the Boards That the General Manager be, and is . and or staff to attend and ar ci- hereby, authorized to designate members ate in meet n s hearings of the Boards and/or staff to attend and nf coerences factinspections participate in meetings, hearings, and other functions conferences facility inspections and Other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by state and federal legislative and, regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel , meals, lodging and incidental - expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1989-90. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement with the That the General Manager be, and is County of Urange for Oata hereby, authorized to execute an Processing Center services agreement with the County of Orange for Data Processing Center services relative to collection of the Districts' annual supplemental user fees. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizi 29 renewala em orar Permit for Groundwater eanup That renewal of Temporary Permit for No. 1-23 issued to the County of Groundwater Cleanup No. 1-23 issued to Orange John Wayne Airport the County of Orange John Wayne Airport, extending said permit from July 11, 1989 to July 10, 1990, to allow the continued emergency discharge of contaminated groundwater from Jahn Wayne Airport to the District' s sewer for an additional one-year period in order to complete construction of the Michelson Bridge included in the general airport expansion project, be', and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue purchase _ orders to soils, concrete and That staff be, and is hereby, authorized materials testing firms for to issue purchase orders to soils, services reguiretl for Districts' concrete and materials testing firms for construction projects services required, beginning June 15, 1989, for the Districts' construction projects over the next two years, as follows: -9- 06/14/89 Total Amount not To to exceed ��.✓ - Smith-Emery Company $200,000 - Twining Laboratories of 200,006 Southern California, Inc. - H.V. Lawmaster 8 Company, Inc. 100,000 - Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. 50,000 - Soil and Testing Engineers, Inc. 50,000 ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly reviewed the Annual nomination for Chairman provisions of the Districts' Rules of of the Joint Administrative Procedure relating to nomination and Organization election of the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary then declared the nominations open. Director Ronald B. Hoesterey was nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. There being no further nominations, it was moved, seconded and duly carried that nominations be closed. The Secretary then reported that the election would be held at the regular July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts. Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chairman will also be held at the regular July meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re NPOES Ocean Monitoring Program Receive file and approve Re ort Moved, seconded and duly carried: and Recommendation for NPOES cean Monitoring Program Year Five That the Report and Recommendation (1989-90) and Selection Committee for NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program Certification re Amendment No. 6 Year Five (1989-90) and Selection to Agreement with 5AIC re Committee certification of the Specification No. 5-032 negotiated fee for Amendment No. 6 to Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (5AIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Approving Amendment No. 6 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: Agreement with 5AIC re Specification No. 5-032 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-53, approving Amendment No. 6 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. 5-032, extending the contract from July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990, for an amount nec to exceed 51,609,570.00 for the fifth year of said contract. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part Of these minutes. -10- 06/14/89 Authoriz1 staff to administer a Moved, seconded and duly carried: ortion of t e Year- ve NPDE cean Monitoring Program S ecification That staff be, and is hereby, No. - 32-1 to include outside authorized to administer a Portion contractual services 15pecitication of the Year Five NPDES Ocean Monitorirk NO. -0 2- A andSpecification Program (Specification No. S-032-1), No. - -1B previously performed by Science Applications International Corporation, for monthly and quarterly water quality sampling and analyses, semi-annual benthic bioaccumulation sampling, quarterly data submittal and the October 30th Annual Data Submission Report, for an estimated cost of $180,120.00; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to incorporate separate outside contractual services in an amount not to exceed $130.300.00, as itemized below, for a total estimated, staff-administered amount of $319,420.00, said work to be implemented pursuant to Districts' staffing, equipment and project budgetary authorizations and procurement regulations. Receive file and a rove ro osal Moved, seconded and duly carried: of Southern a form a coastal Water Research Project re ocean That the proposal of Southern current monitoring and modeling California Coastal Water Research services and re oration of a Project (SCCWRP) dated April 19, Year-Five Ocean urrents Re ort 1989, to provide ocean current pec f cation No. b-03 -SA monitoring and modeling services and the preparation of a Year-Five Ocean Currents Report (Specification No. S-032-IA) for a total amount not to exceed $90,300.00, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Receive file and a rove ro osal Moved, seconded and duly carried: of EcoAnal sIs nc. to assist staff with data handlin an That the proposal of EcoAnalysis, preparation of require uarter Inc. dated May 24, 1989, to assist ODES Reports pec f cation staff with data handling and NO. -18 preparation of required quarterly ODES Reports (Specification No. S-032-1B) for a total amount not to exceed $40,000.00, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive a and approve written report of the Executive LOffFnittee That the written report of the joint and Fiscal Policy Comnittee meeting of the Executive Committee and the Fiscal Policy Committee held on May 24, 1989, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Fiscal Polic omnittee Report re 1989-90 That the Fiscal Policy Committee's personnel requirements and joint report and recommendations re 1989-90 works budgets personnel requirements and joint works operating and construction budgets, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -11- 06/14/89 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving 1personnel requirements and wen din That the 1989-90 personnel requirements ass ca on andCompensat on be, and are hereby, approved; and, eso u on NO. , as amended FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-55, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1989-90 personnel requirements. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Approving e 1989-90 Joini Join following roll call vote: Operating Budget AYES: Edward L. Allen, Wes Bannister, Roland E. Bigonger, A. S. "Buck" Catlin, Jahn C. Cox, Jr., Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Dan R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, Ronald B. Hoesterey, John Kanel , Ursula E. Kennedy, William D. Mahoney, Tom Mays, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Bob Perry, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polls, Sally Anne Sheridan, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Wayne Silzel , Don E. Smith, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry W. Wedaa, Wayne D. Wedin, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Don R. Roth. Roger R. Stanton That the proposed 1989-90 Joint Operating Budget Funds of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1989-90 fiscal year, be, • and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Operating/Working Capital $46,581,000 Workers' Compensation Self-Insured 210,000 Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 1,373,000 Public Liability Self-Insured 321,000 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by gA rovin the 1 a to the following roll call vote: u ay evo v ng un u get AYES: Edward L. Allen, Wes Bannister, Roland E. Bigonger, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John C. Cox, Jr. , Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, Ronald B. Hoesterey, Jahn Kanel , Ursula E. Kennedy, William D. Mahoney, Tom Mays, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Bob Perry, Iry Pickier, Ruthelyn Plumner, Richard T. Polis, Sally Anne Sheridan, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Wayne Silzel , Dan E. Smith, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry W. Wedaa, Wayne D. Wedin, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Don R. Roth, Roger R. Stanton That the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF Joint Works Construction) of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of $102,725,000.00. -12- 06/14/89 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aut or z ng the isca Po icy Committee to evaluate ro osals That the Fiscal Policy Committee be, and Fand to lace Excess orkers' is hereby, authorized and directed to / om ensation nsurance coverage evaluate proposals obtained by the effective July Districts' insurance broker and to place Excess Workers' Compensation insurance coverage effective July 1, 1989; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said action shall be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 12, 1989. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Rules of Procedure Resolution No. 7- 1 re That the Boards of Directors hereby Execu ve ommittee membership adopt Resolution No. 89-56, amending •_ Rules of Procedure Resolution No. 87-51 re Executive Committee membership. A certified copy of this resolution is _ attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No. 10 to Agreement Employing General counseTThat the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-57, approving Amendment No. 10 to Agreement Employing General Counsel . A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: endin laasification and com en- sation Resolution No. 7 -20, as That the Boards of Directors hereby amended re Mana ement and adopt Resolution No. 89-66, amending upervisory Classifications' salary Clasification and Compensation range adjustments Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re Management and Supervisory Classifications' salary range adjustments, pursuant to the Districts' Management Performance Review Program. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Director of Finance to cer c aims and That the Director of Finance be, and is forward to County Auditor for hereby, authorized to certify claims and payment forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1989, and that he declare that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 87-51 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts until the 1989-90 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. ALL DISTRICTS The Boards convened in closed session at Convene in closed session ursuan 7:50 p.m. pursuant to Government Code to Government ode Section 54956.9(b)(1). Section b 1 ALL DISTRICTS At 8:03 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. -13- 06/14/89 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin ans an sec ca ans re on tract No. 2-11-3 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 89-59-2, approving plans and specifications for North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-3, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m. , June 14, 1989. DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting temporary and permanent Grants of Easement from Rancho That the Boards of Directors hereby Tomas, Inc. , formerly Apollo adopt Resolution No. 89-62, approving Development Corporation, re and accepting Grants of Easement from Contract No. 14-1-1A Rancho Tomas, Inc. , a California Corporation, formerly Apollo Development Corporation, a California Corporation, required in connection with temporary construction and perpetual right-of-way needed relative to the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, and authorizing payment of $37,700.00 plus costs for said right-of-way. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving agreement with a ity of Costa Mesa for , coo erative That the Boards of Directors hereby pro ec re Contract No. 14-1-18 adopt Resolution No. 89-64, approving agreement with the City of Costa Mesa for a cooperative project to include City street improvements to Baker Street, between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, in the District's contract for construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-18, and providing for reimbursement to the District by City for their share of the costs of said joint project. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate a Professional That the Selection Committee be, and is Services Agreement with Church hereby, authorized to negotiate a Engineering, Inc. re design of Professional Services Agreement with Contract No. 7-13 Church Engineering, Inc. for design of the Campus Relief Sewer, between Jamboree Boulevard and Van Karman Avenue, Contract No. 7-13. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m. , June 14, 1989. `.r DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m. , June 14, 1989. -14- O6/14/89 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: d ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then , / declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m. , June 14, 1989. `..� DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive le and approve Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee That the Supplemental Sewer Service Use Report for Fiscal Year 1 Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90, dated June 1, 1989, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICT 1 - Public Hearing re proposed Ordinance No. 112 Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:05 p.m. Close Hearing There being no public oral comments, the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:05 p.m. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed rdinance No. 112 That proposed Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 112 by title only. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 112 following roll call vote: AYES: Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset, Ronald B. Hoesterey NOES: None ABSENT: Roger R. Stanton That Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: _ Directing the County Auditor- Controller to include sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-58-1, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 112 of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90 fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -15- 06/14/89 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: AdJournmen That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:06 p.m. , June 14, 1989. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Contract No. 5-31 specifications for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, authorizing an addition of $163,677.00 to the contract with Christeve Corporation for additional work due to undisclosed utilities; installation of three additional pressure access tees and manholes; removal of contaminated soil ; change in grade for new 36" line to accommodate utility lines; additional asphalt paving and backfill due to undisclosed 27-inch force main; and payment of bonus for early completion of contract, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 5-31 as complete . That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-60, accepting Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee That the Supplementai, Sewer Service Use Report for Fiscal Year 1959-90 Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90, dated May 31, 1989, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICT 5 Public Hearing re proposed Ordinance No. 519 Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:07 p.m. Close Hearing There being no public oral comments, the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:07 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 519 That proposed Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 519 by title only. -16- 06/14/89 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the A op ing Ordinance No. 519 following roll call vote: AYES: John C. Cox, Jr. , Chairman, Evelyn Hart / NOES: None ABSENT: Don -R. Roth That Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried; Directing the County Auditor- controller to include sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-61-5, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 519 of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90 fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:08 p.m. , June 14, 1989. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and a prove u lementa ewer Service Use Fee That the Supplemental Sewer Service Use Report or kiscal Year 1989- 0 Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90, dated May 31, 1989, .be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICT 6 Public Hearing re proposed Ordinance No. 613 Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:08 p.m. Close Hearing There being no public oral comments, the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:08 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed rdinance No. 613 That proposed Ordinance No. 613. An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 612, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, ands/ is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 613 by title only. -17- O6/14/89 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 613 following roll call vote: AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Ruthelyn Plummer NOES: None ABSENT: Don R. Roth That Ordinance No. 613, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 612, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Directingthe our u itor- on ro ler to include sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-63-6, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges an the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 613 of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90 fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ,Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:10 p.m., June 14, 1989. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive file and a rove Su lementa Sewer Service Use Fee That the Supplemental Sewer Service Use , port for Fiscal Year 1989-90 Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90, dated June 7, 1989, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICT 11 Public Hearin re proposed OrdinanceNa. 1 Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:11 p.m. Close Hearing There being no public oral comments, the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:11 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Readin of Proposed Ordinance No. 1 09 That proposed Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. it of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and Is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1109 by title only. -18- 06/14/89 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting rtl nance No. 1109 following roll call vote: AYES: Tom Mays, Chairman, Grace Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Roger R. Stanton That Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and is hereby, adapted. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Directinq the County Auditor- Controller to include sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-65-11, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 1109 of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90 fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m. , June 14, 1989. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change rder No. 5 to the lans and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and contract No. - R-1 specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-2BR-(,. authorizing an addition of $72,500.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company for payment of bonus for early completion of specified manholes and rehabilitation of one additional manhole; and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. - DISTRICT 3 The Chairman declared a recess at Recess 8:12 p.m. DISTRICT 3 The Chairman reconvened the meeting at Reconvene 8:25 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Richard Marsh, Special Counsel to the Actions re a eal of Beatrice/Hunt- Board, briefly reviewed the proceedings for Wesson, Inc. re Industrial Waste conducting the hearing on the appeal of Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143 Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. relative to ° Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143. The hearing procedures are governed by the District's Ordinance _ Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, as well as the Rules on Appeal adopted by the Board of Directors on April 12, 1989. Mr. Marsh stated that the hearing was being conducted based on written statements and declarations from both parties. He advised that these declarations, togethe, with oral testimoney, constitute the record upon which the Board should case its / decision. The issue before the Board was whether or not they should grant the appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson or deny the appeal and reaffirm staff's decision relative to pe rnit limits. -19- O6/14/89 Open hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:28 p.m. Staff presentation The Districts' Director of Technical Services gave a brief presentation on the Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson operation and wastewater discharge. For the Directors' information, he also gave a brief orientation on the Districts' treatment process, defining some of the terminology used in the statements submitted to Directors as measures of treatment effectiveness and effluent quality. One term commonly used is "Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)" which is a laboratory test which measures the wastewater's potential effect upon the oxygen levels of a receiving water. Mr. Anderson added that the Districts are operating under permits from the Environmental Protection Agency and the State of California. The BOO requirements of these permits are becoming increasingly stringent, and the Districts must constantly remain below permit limits. Currently, on an average, the Districts' influent contains 500,000 lbs. per day of BOD, and after treatment the BOD in the effluent must be reduced to no more than 180,000 lbs. per day. He pointed out that the treatment plants treat an average of 260 million gallons per day of wastewater. The Districts' 30-year Facilities Master Plan indicates a need for an expanded capacity to 399 mgd by 2020. Mr. Anderson reiterated that it is the Districts' intention to remain in compliance constantly with regulations imposed by EPA and the State of California. In order to accomplish this goal , it is important to strictly enforce the Districts' source control program. This will help prevent the pass-throdgh of untreated BOD to the ocean and protect the secondary treatment process. The bacterial culture used in the secondary treatment process must be stable and maintained under optimum conditions to provide proper treatment. If there is a major change in the sewage content, the treatment process is affected. The Director of Technical Services also showed the Directors an aerial video of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson's site and facilities in Fullerton pointing out the areas where various stages of the canning process take place and open space areas available for future facilities. Receive and file A eal of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Beatrice Hun -Wesson, Inc. That the Appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. dated March 22, 1989, re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Itemization of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Items of Evidence submitted on behalf of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. That the Itemization of Items of Evidence dated May 22, 1989, submitted on behalf of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -20- 06/14/89 Receive and file Statement of Facts Moved, seconded and duly carried: and Memorandum of Po nts an Authorities in Support of Appeal That the Statement of Facts and Memorandum of Points and Authorities , / in Support of Appeal , dated May 23, 1989, re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143, including: - Declaration of James N. Williams - Declaration of Robert C. Thomas - Declaration of John Baird be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Statement of Facts Moved, seconded and duly carried: and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition o opeal That the Statement of Facts and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. , dated June 2, 1989, re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Itemization of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Items of Evidence submitted on behalf of the District That the Itemization of Items of Evidence dated June 2, 1989, submitted on behalf of the District, re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143, including: - Declaration of Richard W. von Langan - Declaration of Stephen C. Hough - Declaration of David Jenkins - Declaration of Kelly Christensen - Declaration of Blake Anderson be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Oral resentation b The Chair recognized Mr. Joel Beatrice Hunt-Wesson, Inc. Moskowitz, of the law firm of Gibson, Dunn 8 Crutcher, representing Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. Mr. Moskowitz questioned the authority and propriety of the District's staff imposing a BOD limitation and requiring pretreatment of their industrial discharge and a reduction of BOD from their cannery. He contended that the canning facility in question had not grown, although he admitted there were seasonal variations, and did not feel it was fair to reduce their BOD limits three months prior to canning season. He also contended that the reason for the restrictions placed upon Beatrice was to accommodate the growth of Orange County. Mr. Moskowitz then cross examined the Districts' declarants Rich von Langan, Kelly Christensen, Stephen Hough, Blake Anderson and David Jenkins. Thomas _ L. Woodruff, General Counsel for the staff, also responded to Mr. Moskowitz' cross examination. In closing, Attorney Moskowitz expressed Beatrice's concerns regarding the necessary investment to build a pretreatment facility on their site. He felt that there was not sufficient time to obtain the necessary approvals. He also felt that the surrounding residential areas would object to this -21- 06/14/89 type of facility. Mr. Moskowitz contended that the District already had treatment facilities and Beatrice should not be required to build such facilities. He reiterated that their plant size had not increased and Beatrice did not feel they should have to shoulder the burden he alleged was caused by the growth in Orange County. He also objected to the possibility that Beatrice may have to cut back their production in order to meet the Districts' restrictions during this canning season. District's oral res on$e to Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , ea r ce un -Wesson's a eal reviewed a prepared summary of remarks y ueneral Counsel and responses which were itemized for Directors and displayed via an overhead projector for them to follow. He advised that negotiations with Beatrice regarding possible future limitations on their discharge began as early as 1985 and referred to a letter included in the declarations submitted by the District which advised Beatrice of this. He commented that the Directors had been unfairly disparaged recently by a lot of misinformation that had been mailed to them by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson interests. In response to Beatrice's contention that it was unfair to ask them to build pretreatment facilities, he noted that 356 other industries have spent from $25,000 to $5 million to build such facilities In order to comply with environmental requirements. With regard to the question posed by Beatrice relative to the legal basis by which the District has the right to impose said limitations, Mr. Woodruff responded as follows: - The Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Clean Water Act") mandated the development by the U.S. EPA of a National Pretreatment Program designed to prevent the discharge to POTW's of pollutants which interfere with, ass throw h or are otherwise incompatible with the treatment facilities. [Clean Water Act, Section 307(b)(c)] - The U.S. EPA has adopted a comprehensive national program regulating dischargers and establishing pretreatment standards and requirements for industrial users and mandating local POTW's to implement this program by adoption of their own pretreatment programs. [Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 403] - The Federal Pretreatment Regulations prohibit any user from introducing into any POTW any pollutant, including BOD, which passes through or causes Interference with POTW' s treatment processes or operations. [Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 4033.5(b)(4)] - Both state and local law authorize the Districts to regulate Beatrice' s BOD discharge into the sewer system. [California Government Code Section 54739; Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201, 208(B)(4) and 302.1(c)] -22- 06/14/89 - The Districts complied with applicable federal , state and local regulations in developing the BOO discharge limitation policy. [Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 403.1 at seq. ; California Government Code Section 54739; District's Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201 and 208(B) (4)] - Locally established limits imposed upon individual industrial users should be preventative rather than reactive. - The Districts have followed the express published guidelines of EPA for pretreatment regulation and implementation, by considering all relevant treatment plant and environmental information, together with sound engineering and scientific data, in establishing the Districts' BOO discharge limits. [EPA Guidance Manual on Development and Implementation of Local Discharge Limitations Under the Pretreatment Program (December 1987) , Section 1.3.2] - District's Ordinance No. 306 authorizes the District's staff to impose pretreatment and discharge limitation conditions on industrial users. [District' s Ordinance No. 306, Sections 302.1 and 302.2] Mr. Woodruff quoted portions of those sections of the Ordinance, as follows: 11302.1 Class I Permit Application: A. ...... B. . C. Other Information may be required to properly evaluate the permit application. After evaluation and acceptance of the data furnished, the District may issue a Class I wastewater discharge permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the District's system." 11302.2 Class I Permit Conditions, Limitations and Stipulations that may be in Permit: A. Mass emission rates regulating incompatible pollutants; B. ...... C. ...... D. ...... E. ...... F. ...... G. .. H. ...... I. J. Other provisions which may be applicable to ensure compliance with all provisions of this Ordinance; K. Other terms and conditions determined by the Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the District's system." -23- 06/14/89 Mr. Woodruff emphasized that based on the above, it is simply not true that the District does not have authority to impose limits on Beatrice just because the classification relative to industries discharging over 10,000 lbs. of BOO was not specifically listed in the District's Ordinance. To date there have only been two other industries in this category--Anaheim Citrus Products (ACP) and Integrated Protein Technology (IPT). They have both built pretreatment facilities and modified their procedures to meet the same discharge standards imposed upon Beatrice. He noted that the Districts' past experience establishes that excessive BOO discharges seriously threaten the Districts' wastewater treatment plants as they pass through and interfere with the operation of the plants and, therefore, jeopardize th�>:ri_cTs' 301(h) waiver in its NPDES Permit, as stated in the declarations of David Jenkins and Richard von Langan. Mr. Woodruff added that Beatrice has the ability to implement procedures to significantly reduce BOD discharges even without construction of a pretreatment facility. He referred to declarations of Kelly Christensen and Richard van Langan which detail some possible procedures. Declarations of David Jenkins and Richard von Langen indicate that Beatrice will be able to efficiently operate a pretreatment facility on a seasonal basis. In peak season, Beatrice's BOD is twice the amount generated by the total population of the City of Fullerton. Also, in peak season, Beatrice's discharge of BOD increased approximately 18% between 1984 and 1987. He reiterated that without the District's BOD limitations, in peak season, Beatrice and other high volume BOD dischargers would cause violations of the Districts' NPDES Permit limits. The General Counsel noted that the Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson facility in Fullerton was not, in fact, in the middle of a residential development, as Beatrice had alleged. There are residences on the eastern boundary, with an airport on the western boundary, and the Hughes factory to the north. The area is basically an industrial park with many industries and a refinery. Mr. Woodruff agreed that Orange County is fast growing and stated that it is the Districts' responsibility to provide treatment facilities for all areas and the new growth. They must, at the same time, comply with all regulations placed on them by federal and state regulatory agencies. The philosophy of the Districts is to protect the land, air and water. Since 1974 the Districts have spent over $300 million, and over the next 10 years they will spend $1 billion to expand and improve the Districts' treatment facilities. Without enforcement of the Districts' BOD policy, the Districts would be required to expend an additional $22 million in capital costs for construction of treatment facilities merely to treat Beatrice's BOD discharges, as indicated in the declaration of Stephen Hough. The General Counsel added that the District's action to issue a permit with conditions to protect the environment does not constitute a "project"; but even if it were, the action is exempt from compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") , pursuant to California Code Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15307, 15308 and 15321. He advised Directors that the District's Ordinance No. 306 and the Districts' 1985 NPDES Permit, bath of which are part of the record, were available for further review. Close hearing The Chairman declared the hearing closed at 11:20 p.m. -P4- 06/14/89 Discussion by Directors The Board of Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion. They asked whether the requirements placed on Beatrice were consistent with other dischargers of their volume and were informed that the 10,000 lb. per day BOD limitation would apply District-wide. Board members inquired about the $4 million estimate for Beatrice to construct pretreatment facilities. Staff reiterated that if Beatrice did not limit their BOD, the District would have to build treatment plant facilities to provide for an additional 15 mgd capacity which has an estimated capital cost to the District of $22 million. Directors reviewed the possible alternative procedures available to Beatrice during the peak period when they would exceed their BOO limitation. Staff noted that they had offered to allow Beatrice to truck their excess wastewater directly to the Districts for disposal but thus far have had no response to that.offer. The Board also discussed possible legal actions available to the District in order to stop the excess BOO discharge from the Beatrice facility. It was pointed out by Dr. Jenkins that Beatrice could operate a substantially odor-free anaerobic pretreatment facility, based on his observations of other similar operations. The amount of land needed for this system would depend upon the design but based on information available to the District, staff estimated .7 acres would be needed. Directors noted that the Districts' industrial wastewater treatment program began in 1976, with pretreatment facilities being required beginning in 1978. Industries in Orange County were involved in the preliminary workshops prior to adoption of Ordinances in 1976, 1983 and the new ordinance to be introduced at the next regular Board meeting. Staff pointed out that the industrial sector and an ad hoc committee had participated with staff in determining the limitations on metals, pollutants, etc. Mr. Baird of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson participated in the last revision of the proposed new ordinance also. The Board questioned whether a pretreatment facility at the Beatrice site would require City of Fullerton permits or CEQA approval . The District's General Counsel indicated that they would be subject to the City's land use requirements but did not know if additional permits would be required. The project would also be subject to CEQA guidelines, requiring preparation of a negative declaration or an EIR, as appropriate. Directors expressed concern that a large industry like Beatrice would not take measures to meet environmental standards and the District's requirements in order to avoid adverse impacts on the treatment process of all of the Districts and, ultimately, on the ocean. They observed that a large industry such as Beatrice should take the responsibility and ' leadership in such a program. It was pointed out by Directors that the Districts have a mandate, as well as an obligation, to protect the environment and to comply with federal and state standards. The Board discussed the issue of equitability of the allocation of costs to all users for the treatment of wastewater by the Districts' facilities, as well as the requirement for industry to build pretreatment facilities. Staff stated that the Districts are concerned with these issues also and felt that the Ordinance provided equitability. -25- O6/14/89 Denial of appeal of Beatrice/Hunt- A motion was made, seconded and, after Wesson Inc. re Industrial Waste discussion, amended, as follows: D scharge Permit No. -1-14 That the Board of Directors of County �...� Sanitation District No. 3 hereby finds that: - On February 15, 1989, the District issued Permit No. 3-1-143 ("Permit") to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ("Beatrice"). - This Permit contains limits on the discharge of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) as set forth herein. - The BOO limits are in accord with previously developed discharge limits applicable to industrial dischargers of disproportionately large amounts of BOO. - The BOD limits set forth in the Permit are necessary in order to meet NPDES Permit requirements and prevent pass-through or interference with the treatment processes of Plant No. 2. - The methodology of restricting the introduction of BOD into Plant No. 2 as evidenced by the Permit is consistent with the guidelines promulgated by EPA. - The Permit was validly issued under the laws of the State of California and the District's Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities. - The issuance of the permit is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act because (a) The issuance of this permit is not a project or (b) If the issuance of the permit is determined to be a project, it is categorically exempt under 14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15307; 15308 and 15321. - The classification which distinguishes Beatrice and other high-strength BOD dischargers from other users of the Districts' sewerage system is reasonable. - There are feasible methods by which Beatrice can obtain the BOD levels set forth in the Permit. - These methods can be implemented for costs which are reasonable in light of all the circumstances prevailing. and, therefore, does hereby deny the appeal of Beatric/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. dated May 22, 1989; does ratify the action taken by the District staff in issuing Permit No. 3-1-143; and does confirm all the provisions thereof. The Directors commented further on the Districts' legal and environmental responsibilities and obligations, as well as the equitability of the costs associated with treatment of wastewater. Following a call for the question, a roll call vote was taken on the motion to deny the appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. The Secretary reported that the motion had carried. -26- 06/14/89 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:55 p.m., June 14, 1989. Secretary, Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -27- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04/85 PAGE I ._. REPORT NUMBER AP43 _ rnm .eun IT1n1 .1.1RICIA OF M..AL_000NEg CLAIMS PAID 05/10/89 POSTING DATE 05/14/69 _.__YARRAN C-NO�_--_._. - YE N00R—__- •II0D11• -.—.____.__ _._._ ._.--0ES CR1P.7 rnu ._ 0q.451 A.M. BEST COMPANY 590.13 PUBLICATION "2----A DL7-ING-CN6LMC ENS Si 0f—_——__-_---TRIN88RFNG-SRRVIC85-0IST-S— -- 099453 ACHE MELDING 015. TRAILER REPAIR 19.954 AOVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. f1.391,678.97 CONSTRUCTION ]-IS 099456--AIERICAN 3NFUTERL— $27.8n __.. _- _ __OFFICE SMOTM UPPLI --.--_ 099457 AMERICAN COMPUTER SUPPLY S557.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 099457 AM E0.ICAN MEDIA. INC. f55 T•95 VIDEO Ir 9459---ANAMELAN-TECNNIGSTRUCTIO �4.366.32 099460 THE ANC SEVER CONSTRUCTION $9.$40.04 MECHANICAL REPRISE DIRT 7 099g64 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 3q0.➢q MIFFIG WL PARTS "i---ARATEX SERTENS-- SS 543- B6 -._....__—UOIFOR6-FAD6 n' 099463 FALTER SERVICES. INC. ,341.22 MITOREM I' 099963 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE s99.... 22 WIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88Ogg, 0"164---BRNSRACHo INC, ^LY ---- INSTRUMENT NST UMEOPPLIE• 099466 9ACH ABAR07 INC. f221.00 CONSTRUCTION REPAIRNSERV4 �a - 099966 P.W. RIES-T7 AND ASSOC. $6_... I0 CONSTHVCTIOM SERVICES PI-25626.P2-32.99.94.37 X-C9946-T-------BATIERI SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS ,781.9E __ _.__._-_—LAVE• PARTS D99469 BEATER SCIENTIFIC PROOUC TS $3$246.85 LAB SUPPLIES 2 499469 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES. INC. f196•B5 CAR WASH TICKETS 99471 MARERT BEIBN-VAFFRPROROST •• !.,a 7RG 5 G SERVICE b: 099472 ROISET CASCADE LLIAM OFFICE FROST f AS $ $1.641.32 ENGOFFICE IERVIGE$ 88-I44-5.99-16 099472 RGISE CASCADE OFi ICE PRODUCTS f1.641.32 OPPICB ARTS - 099475 BOYLERENN R-FIEDLER 4 CORE f64$386.64 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES RES 88-103 09"75 BRENNER-FIEOLEP 6 ASSOC., INC. f396.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLI69 . - 1---09M i6 DA-I4iHNEE{i:E[-SA-7 -- -- ---BLRQRi6-MtTBR I�, 099477 RROVN S CALDWELL $220.00 LAB SERVICES Ic' 899478 BROWN C CALOWELL CONSULTING $27.516.56 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-37 o ------0999T9---------9TEYE ENGINEECONS TRUCTfON�Or --SiB5Y$4TMR------------ ---GOECTRUCFHPPLIER 099461 PUPNE G. ENGINEERING CO. f44.64 08CTRIC HREIIBU 099461 GA P.Y 6. STR EEO f460.06 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT --b994Gl --f6-k-S ECBNDITIONINs5ve so ---------MBTRRiARFG --- - 099463 CS COMPANY f3.042.11 VALVE r C99484 CSI-CALTROL $4,503.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS' ---- -099486--- --CAL-BALSA-FOR-RES EAROM r-ONC-E- ----N9.05 CHEMICALSFB� "' - 099487 CAL-FAO CHEMICAL NEE CO.. INC, 466.05 ENGINEERS 0...E7 CARLETOR ENGINEERS f4.466.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES 099489 CAHN-GARERLB-ENGINEERS-- —'LP91.45M9---- TRUCK PUTS-6ERV0W6-J-I3.Pi-20 - ;,, 095496 CASE ROVER f E6DIPME NT 31.938.39 TRUCK PARSE R� 099494 CENTURY SAFETY INST. f SUMP. S11B.08 SAFETY SWPLISS iu `. -C 99491--_ . " GMAM PION-FENC['C0•--.----_.-----.._--327iMr04—_-. 099492 CHEM SERVICE $432.10 LAS SUPPLIES p( 099493 CHEMVEST INDUSTRIES, INC. fBC.574.40 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-09-88 M=. ---- 099 M4 CMESSEw CORP.-- .— i:Bs:B -- 099495 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $23.595.30 OIL 6 GREASE 099496 OHRISTEVE CORP. f804.152.T5 CONSTRUCTION 5-31 FUND NO 91?^ - JT CIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/69/B9 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT o5 F ORANGE Coux T1'_.. CLAIMS PAID 05/10/89 POSTING DATE O5/10/89 ARRANT NyiyEM00� AMOUNT _ _ O[SCRIPTION P99497 WILLIAM N. CLARKE $96.00 MEETING MUSE _ 09949e CQ@(NNE,CJ.693 oy 3123.85 MIE11CM MUSE 099199 COAST INSUR LACE AGENCY 3323,400.00 INSURANCE M.O. 1-12-89 ". 095500 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF. CALIF 32,OSO.OQ ALUMINUM PLATING 099501 CONNELL._GA.N._PARIX_"IV. 51 B3.61___._. ---TRUCK PARTS 999502 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CIST. $2,632.01 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 099563 CONSOLIDATED FREIGhTWAYS $911.99 mim 099504 COOP A__ME0..Y_SERVICFS 91.594.41 _ MECBANCIAL SUPPLIES ��.. ' 099505 COUNT WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 32,269.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES - 099506 CRANE VETOR COPP. S02.83 WILDING MATERIALS _._R99517 _ _SMARLES_P-_CROWLE]L_ 0. __ 356.76 _ PAIR PARTS 099500 CAL WATER S165.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 099509 CYBEPES S2,250.0C SERVICE AGREEMENT n 99v10 O.Q`EN.6LHEERIMG i190.Oj_ TRUCK REPAIRS 099511 ONE. INC. 3273.30 HARDWARE 099512 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 25.580.01 TINES FM—602513 ___.._70N..DAVF3.--- _.___ $f OB.50 , __.. ___Mg871NC a%PW3H C99514 DECO $676.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 2 099515 DE2URTK AND/OP. CS CO. $2,812.94 VALVE PARTS 022216 _fIl3.TFC_POLY_MtRS__ $2,645,94 _ANIPEISEYQ=M M.O.B-10-RD -� 099517 DICKSOMS 49B.55 ELECTRIC PARTS -4 099518 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $3,943.22 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIR ++1——ouxx.EOW3aos.Dnae. SL7R.2�,_ PAM.SUPPLTES Iv n 099520 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. $499.79 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT N 099521 EFE TECHNOL06TES $1,879.13 RBFUW USER PEE OVERPAYHOUT ...g11 F^e Y MANR-1NC__ a.1A-.p QFPILE SUPPLIES lo- 099523 W. M. EBERT CORP. $100.711.47 CONSTRUCTION 2-27 099524 ECOSYSTEMS ENG.A ANALYSIS f13260.00 CONSULTING SERVICES VISUAL.-IMAGE01 -_. •R•+l2...SA_.—.__-__-.___ .ACTIQN PLAN NUDES _ « 099526 EDVAFD L. ELLIOT. JR. 9752.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES wn� 099527 EMERY L PUROLATOR $35.00 FREIGHT ___ENCHAMTEB._lNC._ ........ OLEANOGMPNTC RESFARCJ! M.D.f-IGF97 _ Mi 049529 EVERECT EQUIPMENT f7.618.18 MISCUE 099530 FACTORY REPRESENTATIVE, INC. f6B6.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS .,{ _ ---099531--.--.JOHN_N.-GALKEMSTCIN�C- 'S.S70 OO --. __CONSTRUCTION 9F VTCAP J_-7d._110-_ - ` 999532 FARR SALES 3 SERVICE 3220.11 FILTER 99533 FAST TRACK. INC. $69.00 CONFUTER SOFTWARE pe. 099535 -FEDERALES3RESS-.CWP •$9.56 __ ATR PPEICPT 099536 FILTER GAS ( 37.50 PWHANI 099536 FILTER SUPPLY CO. f1r33 7.S0 MECHANICAL PARTS __-09933T____.__.. SUPER O.SYS TEMP... •51..16..__________._-PUMEPARTR 099539 FOUNTAIN PUMPS. INC. "$203.01 PUMP PARTS ` 099539 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 3203.J1 PAINT SUPPLIES __ 9-5A0 __GENGAIERAL I ELECLASSTRIC CO.SIn� ER3 ay6u_.^ _ __.. ENGINEERING YTCES SERVICES _ 099511 GENERAL ELECTRIC C $5.650.00 WNSTRUCIIO SERVICES J-IS y`L ` 099512 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION f18V.267.39 CONSTRUCTION 1-13A x� nq FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04199 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 —_ _.—_—_.__..----LG➢LAIMS PAID 05/1RISER-IGIS-ING DATEC-LOYILIT__ CLAIMS PAID OS/IO/e9 POSTING DATE .^5/10/69 -- AMOUNT - __..._._... - _➢ESCRSPSlOu 099543 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,263.04 TELEPHONE 0G95•• 6E.ORGL-LEECN_L-ASS CCI•TLS fl 39-•• eLICCTRIC-cARTs 399545 GIERLICH-NITCHCLL. INC. 819.209.30 MECHANICAL PARTS 099596 GOLDEN COAST BIOMASS ENERGY CO $368.41 SAWDUST --OGGS97 T.NONAS_IRAV- S-ASSOC.,INC .--iR58.00-- - -- —SAP TSSTIM 099590 GREAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. 5110.98 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 099549 DON GREEK L ASSOCIATES $6,293.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES RU88-I41-2 _.�53556—.--_6RiNNELIrCORRORAUOu ... .. 099551 MALFRIN SUPPLY CO. 590.83 FITTINGS 0' 099552 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $9.241.33 PUMP PARTS ---09955]- ----- HATCH S-KIAM.-IMC.-- - --ti9611.1b-- -- - ---- ----MECHANICAL-PART6 -- 099559 HEWLETT PACKARD $517.24 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 099555 MILTI, INC. S88.78 PUMP PARTS "SSG--a100080N-ELE CiRiC— 92.801 AO -- 6LEGTAEGA4688Vi68E itr u. 099557 HOERSIGER C.Y.S. CALIF. • INC. 11.899.O0 MEACHANICAL PUTS in 099558 HOSE DOCTOR 5151.90 PUMP PUTS -.FS1-099559-- -- -- --HOUSE-OF. BATTERIES— X 09-560 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. 3388.50 HARDWARE = 099561 HUGHES MICROELECTRONIC 5999.99 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT ___Gli-Y-OF-HUN11N6i0N-BE AGM FN�659�2b—.—_... - --YAS'eR-U6EA68 099563 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY 5127.2C H Alue Ao� 099564 IMD DELAYAL INC. $1.608.58 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES :D 099866----T8"-COMPANF-- —SN�696.i9—._-------_IxSmUMe•" :a C99566 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,291.69 FITTINGS W 099567 INGRAM PAPER $256.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES ,993,,---iRY-FNE-R AN6IF YAiEF-6}9iR:vT Li4 66 --------- NAT6 S &es I• 099569 RIVIERA FINANCE $676.82 JUITORIAL SUPPLIES 099570 MAMAN BEARINGS S SUPPLY 886.99 FITTINGS •,-----099591--------'KAkER-COMPANY ----- --$1 16---- TOOLS -, 399572 KEENAN SUPPLY $570.49 VALVE 0995" THE KEITH COMPANIES 89.918.9G ENGINEERING SERVICES BEG 88-65-3 -- .99591---- KIEVIF-PACIF-1Ci-0 iT5SBi'lYBr39-- ----nON6TRUC9f0N3BRtlClEB-Pt-YO;PI-Ii—'- 099575 KING BEARING. INC. $13,339.45 MACHINE SUPPLIES 099576 KIRST PUMP R MACHINE WORKS $1.055.00 PUMP PARTS MARTIN-KORDICK.-SP--- 3evBEYv26-- --'-'-- --'-00NSTRUCTLO"ERVICE"-29s5-31-- 099570 L.A. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $1.367.52 PUMP PARTS 099579 L.B.Y.S.. INC. $21.B9 NET SUPPLIES W' kAGE"UPpLie"_SEMYSOE-- ----G5E9 94----- ----PRIWt9UPPLt85 -- b_ 0.99501 ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE $340.80 PUBLICATIONS F. 099502 LEARN - PC VIDFO SYSTEMS ' 5703.5C COMPUTER VIDEO o. - --M99583---- - LIf ECOM-SAFETY CYLINDER REPA[R9---- - ----- ----- - 0995b9 LIMITOPDUC CORP. 51076.35 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 399585 N.F. LINDSTROM. INC. 510.359.40 CONSULTING SERVICES-MASTER PLAN •: ��-- 099566---'-NBC-APPLICB-EMVIR ONNEM7A 16./0---- - - ' --OCGN MONITORING-- ---------�' 099507 MPS $52.37 PHOTO SERVICES x' 09958E PACONC0 $109.80 MAINTeN:1NCE CONTRACT FUND NO 9199 JT DIST MOANING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5104/89 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION OILTRICTS OF OPAl1aEL_COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 55/10/89 POSTING DATE 05/10/89 _VENDOR-__.... _-_____AMOUNT 099589 MALCOLM PIRNIE . INC. 3106.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES - MASTER PLAN �. 099590 _NIRSMALL MAIM]__9P000CTION3 3283.OP - SAFm VIDEOS 099591 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S31.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES F• 099592 MASTER TOOLS SERVICES 3512.84 TOOL REPAIR p -2952L____aII_S�NLOf,T_3NE.__ $1,753.67 CNIQINATION PARTS 099594 MCKENNA ENGR. R EQUIP. $I6.198.P7 PUMP FARTS 099595 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP S572.27 THUM PARTS 099596 _ PEOLI_N CONRQLaS CO. 3380.49 _._yOUC¢ �'• 099597 MILLIPORE AND/UA HATERS $1.166.05 LAB EQUIPMENT -"' 099598 MLADEN SUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO $355,595.99 CONSTRUCTION 3-34R 099599 _-NQMIT4K.JYC. _ $328.52 __ _ OTPICB REPAIRS I+- -' 099600 MONITD2 PUBLISHING CO. $300.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS c C99601 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES f2.865.00 LAB SERVICES N I ON..INGumitS.A INC. $337.61 RDBIRR PPOMIPI'S �' 099683 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES S73.63 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES TI 099604 NATIONAL ELECTRIC TEST. ASSOC. S131.J0 PUBLICATION BTS-099605___. __.-_NATIONAL FILM -AEOIA-CORR• _ AA•125.13___.__,_ x,C....CAI. -- "S 09960E NEAL SUPPLY CO. S360.86 HARDHARE _ 099607 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $21.74 WATER USEAGE n• _W (a9RD8___yDRIMHE$3_S.QIIR-.YELDINEt. IMC_ SP19.Qu _____ _ MRfNANfIAI P1PTS 099689 O.M.S. 31.560.06 TRASH BINS 099610 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 6194.29 SAPEIY GLASSES : IEPICE-el l 10MAIYLvelne ovu- a t>._yl__ __.Ovvic¢ mmxlnmv ___ M 099612 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDES 369.00 SURCRIPTION r 099613 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. 339.601.28 CHLORINE M.O. 10-12-88 m: ,Alk -ORAN-F COAST-ELE11211 anooM . S.c9-u -ELCTRIC RTT"TTRR 099615 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 3164.75 TRUCK PARTS 099616 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $38.16 CHEOICALS u: -- 99617- __.__._.. __ORANGE-WLVE-L_E3 T71YG 0 ' 9961 OXYGEN C 39I2.91 SPECIALTY GASSES p. a 099619 OF ORANGE COUNTY OF ORANGE ...982.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES t. 9621 rnCIIIIC AJILTDATA SYSTEMS So.>ce-t8 REINBIERF OFTWARE cnw Txcneeufv _ I•' 099622 PACIFIC DS Td CON SY STE XS $115.68 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 099622 PACO PUMPS 31 NO3.65 PUMP PARTS = ---099623----PACIFIC SAL ET.T-EOYIRMEM310- t3.6�.83- - ETY_SPPLTuc 09962♦ PACIFIC BELL 513.3ETGONE o-a 099625 PAN WEST 3321.31 TELEPHONE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES I^� ^ 96^6 PARTS ENGTDUCLIUNS - . w� 099628 PARTS EN67MED CO. COMPANY $361.72 MECHANICAL PARTS MENT ' 099628 PHOTO L SOUND CO. f361.72 ORRICE EQUIPMENT 99629.-.__.._ _ _RICKWICR-PAPER -- _ +AS.SL---- -- TAW ImvT: almm T,, 099630 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $191.15 PLASTIC BOTTLES 099631 POLYPURE. INC. 513.961.67 CATIONIC POLYMERS M.0.3-8-89 ^61^ _.pOMM-CLECTROSUPPL. 099633 POWER MACHINE CO. S318.00 MP SOMECHANCIAL PARTS w C99630 POWER-UF f52.95 COMPUTER FTWARE FUND NO 919^ JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04189 PACE 5 _. REPORT NUMBER AP43 " , •.S3OALDL"• ne u6E_COUML7— ' ' CLAIMS PAID 05/10/09 •POSTING DATE 05/13/09 . _ VENDOR—_ --..__ .. . —DES L....... 099635 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 999.0C ICE .--099636 OLUT"N CO SM 000 Lf -------___SM6TIUM®1'C-INSPRCSIOH-➢1-20,J-IS,P2-)3,37--�. 099637 RNI MARKETING $143.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES i. 099638 RECTC. INC. 339.140.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-I1-88 0996a9---REM-YIN G-SHOE&— •"80,04------- TEMPORARY RY ' 099641 REMEDY TEMP Si$438.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES 099691 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. f930.lS PIPE FITTINGS —Y 9964B----REYNOLD-POWER TMANSKUS1ON •`-""".OG---- MBGNANCZA6-pePAiRB I�._ 099643 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. $444.226.39 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4,J-20 099644 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. $2.852.46 CHEMICALS 099"S5 --.—ROSAN/REYNOPD-1MG REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 099646 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL $3.454.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 09964] ROTANIU4 PRODUCTS CO. $268.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES —049 NB FARE33-K LEEK-CORP •"• "0 PART ems•"" M M 9649 SANCON ENGINEERING INC. $17.830.00 GENRE REPAIRS ..i 099650 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO. 1]56.61 W SUPPLIES .f,^ SCNAEFER-6}#ON-ASG0C4ATCi AEA.BB6�}1-------------ENGINEERftIF6ERVIGEb-OESF}HA-- _ a x 099652 THE SCMOOLEP CO. $5,753.00 APPRAISAL SERVICES 'y = 099653 SEA-BIRO ELECTRONICS. INC. $220.00 LAB SUPPLIES "`9 "' ^0k6i-Ofd ISMS r1M.i7— OFFICE EPAER6 Q1 w 099655 SHAMROCK SUPPLY Rf458.53 TOOLS 'r 099656 SIGMA CIRCUTS 31033.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 099657-----SL-IDE-M/EERS-VEST— '8---------SOIL TESTINCE9 -- 699658 SMITH-FIFEMERY CO. $637$104.94 SOIL INGTIUP !" 69% SMITH FIFE L SUPPLY. INC 3304.94 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 595'%6tr $0. COAST AIR QU-ENT#NEH19 '8-- - SOIL TESTINGES 099E62 SOU COAST AIR DODGE QUALITY $$37.14 TRUCK FEES 099662 SOUTH COAST DODGE i3T•S4 ]'ROCK PARTS i.. --l99hh]-- --' --'8W7MfR N-CANE Fr-E DISON t0. ----i4 ,.� 699664 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $23,263.60 DIESEL FUEL 099665 SPEAR PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION $11,932.60 CONSTRUCTION DIST 14 �.�. — Yfi,6h SPEC TECH WESTERN— Osviivs ----- --NELDFNOSUPPtFES --- 099667 SPEECO $1.056.33 SCALE MAINTENANCE o. 099660 ROBERT SPIES $600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ANNUAL REPORT _. 099670 SCOTT STEVENS $39.75 MEETING MUSE 099671 SUPELCO. INC. $1.145.80 LAS SUPPLIES n. " E-SUPPotRS-- --3'7Y7'J93'A9 099E73 SUR-LITE CORPORATION $6.384.13 BURNER REPLACEMENTS 099674 7AGGIN• WAGGON MOFILMOME PARK f945.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPATNBMI' ._._. ._.-09969y_..__. .__ TAN-T AN AMINE-. .. 099676 TAYLOR-DUNN $187.06 TRUCK PARTS a 099677 TELEPROOUCTS CORP. $490.40 INSTRUMENT 99*78-- +I-Co HiHE-INSURANCE 3.75B.bB--------- -CRAMT-DEEDS- - ---- C99679 TRAVEL TRAVEL $467.00 TRAVEL SERVICES 899688 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $382.17 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS �n FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/94/89 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITITION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L15113/89 POSTING DATE 05/10Y09 WARRANT NQi_ YFNOQB AMOUNT ._, DESCRIPTION �I 099681 TWINING LABORATORIES $I L d52.29 PIPC INSPICTION 099682 UTA-ENINEEA.LbiA INC, 1..261.59 1pg�RI_NC SERVICES P2-60 —. •+ 099663 UNOCAL f129.66 GASOLINE 099689 THE UNISOURCE CORP. $154.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES ":::Is ___04ITCO PAPM SERVICE 2131.11 ___PARCEL SERVICES 099686 UNITED STATES POSTAL SEPVICE $1,268.03 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 099687 URBAN ALTERNATIVES 98.366.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROD n p 996Bb V� 6 ^� 099689 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. fS.tlb 06 HARDWARE 099690 YAREC DIVISION SA2.58 MlB AHECAL PARTS — �1� _' p99641 ._V6PfAtl_1NSLRYMENTJiB.QLLP _ f32SzQ-s13 _J,68.SIBpyLes --J'+vl 099692 VEHICLE SPRING SERVICE 6583.99 TRUCK REPAIRS 099693 VERTEX SYSTEMS $4.975.00 COMPUTER SOMME 'a nggL9e W1ILLNQ_LNDUSI81A1 ex PPLY <e93 n• _ EM7YY SUPP.TP9 —� 099699 VILLAGE NURSERIES $63.94 GROUND COVER 'w 099696 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $5.403.00 WILDING REPAIRS n9e197 —_.JQMN_R. NAP.LES .. ____ s915.99 _._ppBgyOTROT CQHSULnNc ___. 099698 CARL WARREN 6 CO. 5300.30 LIAR. INSURANCE ADHIN. C99699 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL S30.196.24 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT Qom ]95)p° PAN.CG__.. S1y62e•99 _MECHASTCAT. PARTS __ a "= 099701 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $12.360.60 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-10-88 ' 099702 VEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. f990.54 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES a ,'bT nee)ns YLLSON t5J.0Y1RNENI_arx)e.<..ur _..— <....9)a_aP vru:Txvvorxn MRYLCR=�_-12— _ IN -A-i 699704 YOOOWARD CLYDE CONSULTANTS $1,578.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES - PILE DRIVING 099705 XEROX CORP. f5.849.79 COPIER LEASES — x nee)nc llFRARtM AND_A•PER , nsL PPa"aa rnxSTRnrrmx vn_aT .u� —--------------- � i y 'P s).2s ---.-... .. . . ... ......TOTAL CL►1M8_RA1D_05/1]L89__ qi 5arrrerPa_Pq s99Rs v� :v �x w ..d .Y _-- _—__-__�.y7 • vl '+1 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST NORRINO CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/04/89 PACE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY M AINE PAID 05/10/89 POSTING DATE 5/10/89 SUMeNRY ... _-- AMOUNT _.__. __ _ . . _ _—_"__—__ —._ ___ •r i• 92 AM POND { . 92 AM POND 3,997.51 92 F R POND 253,266266.9595 --_ 13 OPER FUND 238,070.38 05 23 AGO FUND 238.575.00 _ •- 3 P R FUNo--�- ------- 575.00 p� 95 OPEN FUND 2,465.95 or 23,111.83 96 ACO FUND 8.396.93 n. 96 P/R FUND 7,SOU. 97 OPER FUND _.__.... _.._ .241.4969 ._ 97 AGO FUND 3L.189.87 •' _ , . 97 P FUND 6, 863.60 SIOPEN 6� FUND. OPE FUN P1T /14 AM FUND 60.16 = /14 AM FUND 69,760.16 �— 11516 AM FUND AS1,91fi.41 ___..___ f7614 OPER FUND 689.14 JT OPER FUND 752.470.45 u. "E�__.____. 8.550.72 _ b. D 6ELP FUNDED NURSING CRS CAMP FUND FUND 6,147.44 rc 1 JT DIST NOPRINC CAPITAL FUND 186,167.44 la• r V --� — f 7.257.049.26 W Lr r t. 4' w v: ue v sa� ..I FULD NO 91b- - JT LIST WONKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/P4 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID C5/24/89 POSTING DATE 05/24/89 •� A :1 Ir 09975P ARM OUSINCSB MACHINES $21.26 SERVICE AGREEMENT 099761 ADAMSON UNIFORM G EQUIP. $1.568.25 LAB SUPPLIES • 099762 AIP PRODUCTS S CHEMICAL INC. S4048.90 START-UP FEES LJ 59976- AMERICAN CHAIN S GEAR CO. $872.36 PUMP PARTS '•�, 399)65 AMERITECH $261.60 COPIER LEASES p.l 09976 1 7 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $2.417.13 O'RINGS 6 GASKETS 099768 BLAKE P. ANDEPSON $1.410.55 MEETING EXPENSE jq 099 ATEXSCRYICES. INC. .8491 UNIFORM RENTALS 099771 NICHOLAS ARHONTES 1316.75 MINING 6 MEETING EXPENSE y� hLEUIXIC SUPPLIER r. So 191773 ASB0C1ATEp 8A6 CO. $66.15 OPERATING SUPPLIES Ae w 099774 B L K PRECISION f85.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR A. P , . 6n X P90 776 BANK OF AMERICA ^T1SA 111.66 BANK CARDS ev N•.�=,� 399777 P,L'. 6APOTTI Apo ASSOC. 15.640.3E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P2-33.34,32.37 y >J 095779 8. BATEMAN $575.00 DEFERRED CRAB DISTRIBUTION N —1 099780 BATTERIES NEST INC. f419.89 TRUCK PARTS . P• P497E3 6TTFTSCTETTFT'C-I IIUUL14 TLCER w I 099)F2 PCY) ENGI NCERING. ITC. S67 d2 COMPRESSOR PARTS p997P3 6LACK P9A CORP $602.79 COMPUTER HARDWARE 099785 BONNEVILLE EQUIP.. INC. f9.790.0G CRANE SAFETY CERTIPIMTBS 099786 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP S107r699.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES 14-1 PUBLICATION A' w� p9975R RU.RE ENGINEERING CO. $162.71 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 6t 499789 PUSH AND ASSOCIATLS. INC. f1 027.00 LAND SURVEYING M.0.6-8-88 1 C G R PECONOITIONINC CO. f390.00 MECRANICAI. PARTS _ 095)9095)9 CS CDMPAXY 315.59 OXYGEN SUPPLIES a A99794 CALTROL . INC. 1989.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES .ei 099795 JOHN CAROLLC ENGINEIRS f196094.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34•PI-20.J-15 099797 CHEVRON' U.S.A.. INC. • S2.551.68 OIL 6 DEBASE 099798 CLARK CONSULTANTS $2,640.00 CONSULTING SERVICES .I C998p6 CUMPRE6SOR COFFORLNTS OF CALIF $2.725.0C GEARS 6 CHAIN •� 09"bCl CONSOLIDATEC LLECTFICAL GIST. $6,552.16 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 099803 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $285.51 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 099804 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELCCTRIC 91.088.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES p� o. FUND AO 919- - JT UIST L'OPYING CLhITAL PROCESSING OATS 5/17/89 PAGE P REPORT NUMRFR AP43 ! CLAIMS PAID 55/24/09 POSTING DATE C5/24/89 t� 099815 CAL WATER $312.32 REVEAL EQUIPMP.NI' 099B4i 2ANl El$ TIRE SERVICE $2.265.76 TIRES 099808 OEZURIN AND/OR CS CC. $3.953.23 VALVE PARTS fl-�ltlll A- G45bI6 DORR-OLIVEM. INC. S849.i5 MECHANICAL PARTS I.a� P99bll DRESSER INOUSTRIFS. INC. $2.472.24 MECHANICAL PARTS C59613 EASTPAN. INC. $2.935.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES1. G> 09981. EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $46.00 TRUCK PARTS 1. 6-0 599616 LIEPCRT COIF r • 12.100•41L PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE "• 099F.17 ENGINEERING NE0 RECOIL STO.fO PUBLICATION 099RIR ERYSI COYCC E [ C OVIC2 $t 592 25 LEG11T SER ETLES jml 095615 JEFF ESSER $130.08 MLMGE E%PBNSF as 09982D NAASMALL FAIRRES 1340.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _ l w: • t . 2 099622 FEDEPAL EXPRESS CORA. 6356.0C AIR FREIGHT a m 099623 FEPRELLGAS $29.25 PROPANE v.a � •059E25 FISCHER S PORTER CO. $9,862.96 CHLOR MTION PARTS 099826 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $302.64 FILM v.'�j )59 V2P FOUNTAIN VALLEY FLIRT f724.28 PAINT SUPPLIES m N P95929 THE FOXBORO CO. s4.348.57 INSTSUMENT SUPPLIES Ptl G99831 FRUEHAUF DIVISION $12.455.81 TRUCK REPAIRS 099RJ2 CITY OF FULLERTON 590.21 WATER USEAGE 395634 GICRLICn-P.ITCHFLL, INC. AI.044.05 POMP PARTS 6. 095835 J.Y. GLASC. INC. $511.51 TRAINING VIDEO 099837 GRAPHIC CONTROLS s331.04 INSTRVMENT SUPPLIES p! 099838 TORY GUTIERREZ 1118.02 MININGERPENSE aN C99b4P FALL, A. HARPER $1.45G.GG DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 099P41 MLTCM E EA RN. INC. 15,577.43 MECHANICAL PARTS w 099843 HOLRBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 158i.95 COMPRESSOR PARTS 099844 DONALD 0. HONOMICHL 5300.20 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ,.. -t UT 1l TEVI[9 ST56 TI RE[T 1Ny� 695846 R.S. NUGMES CO.. IhP i . 1 RAMOS ]9904] CITY OF MUNTIN6T01i PEACH $143 WATER U EA.— .S HHpp xx Wj Iw' C99b49 HYOROTEX $7.461.13 TEST EQUIPMENT F6�.•1 09965O ENTERPRISE ENGINE DIV. $46.71 MIGHT PpMpoo. V6i 6ae J FUND NO -1- - JT GISI WORMING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 5117/99 PACE REPORT NUMBER AP43 a CLAIMS PAID 05/24/89 POSTING DATE 05/24/P.9 �I , 399P51 1SCn C04PAMY 31.066.09 LAB SUPPLIES 111*2711 C99853 J L 6SCIEN7IFIC f17..11 MR. PLIES ui 099654 RIVIERA FINANCE $301.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIER Im . . 1.4 II C99656 JONES I STONES ASSGC..iNC. 19.729.IP CONSULTING SERVICES RES 88-27 ,d 0996.7 PAMAN PEAPINGS T SUPPLY f99O.01 FITTINGS n� lu 099860 NC CX AN SUPPLY i1.131.03 VALVE PARTS ,u C99060 KING BEARING. INC. $2,004.16 MACHINE SUPPLIES . , f99062 -ART]'.' KORDICK, SP 12.383.1E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-29.5-30 .95863 LA POTTL ChEMICAL FPODUCTS f185.51 CHEMICALS !!te�a 0 998 65 LIFCCON-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY $474.41 CYLINDER SEPAin N.I C95066 LIMITONOUE CORP. 11.082.04 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS Pa ITT N35ES7 Z.T. ETNGF L r IbUl,bi AHCl9A'IAL SOPPI."TES w X 099866 NPC AFFLIED ENVIRONMENTAL i585.G( OCEAN MONITORING - LAB SERVICES W�= 699069 P05 36.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS v. 001.71 MS DATA SERVICE VI CC CORP. i127.20 DATA TRANSFERS 6. -I 099872 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. f661.76 FILTER PRODUCTS :� b0 099.74 NATI - CPLOA. INC. $37}.1. CHLORINATION PARTS u. W P99875 MCNASTf R_pARR SUPPLY CO, 383.11 SHAFT SUPPLIES .90 u PS A99B77 MEDLIN CONROLS CO. f101.83 GAVGE •, w�099878 HICROAGE COFPUTER $25,692.52 H SOFIVARB/COMPUTERS u 09986E PIOLAND MFG. CORF. $646.12 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES C99f.61 MILLIPOPC AND/OR WATERS 1129.16 LAB SUPPLIES e.--Z . C-9863 JARES M. POKTGOMERY 112:626.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES - POOL AIR SCRUBBERS U.I 099889 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $2.308.79 HARDWARE -�9 • REPLACEMENT Ni. C99606 NATIONAL PLACE RENTALS 3566.43 FENCING jd A95697 KATIOKAL LUMBER f530.16 HARDWARE 099889 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $842.59 PIPE 6 FITTINGS �i�969P NEWARK ELECTRONICS 318.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS �.J f99P92 OLYPPIC CPCUICAL CO. 313,677,16 CHLORINE M.O. 10-12-88 CP9893 ROb EPT J. CCTE1. SM.% TMINING EXPENSE j Ga9895 ORA116E COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $140.22 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS b.l G99696 ORANGE VALVE C FITTING CO. f2B9.11 PITTIHGB Iw �I FUND NO 41?q - JT LIST WCRKING CAFITLL PROCESSING DATE 5/17189 PAGE r REPORT NUMBER AP43 _ • CLAIMS PAID 05/24/89 POSTING DATE 35/24/89 'I la' 499697 OSCAR-$ LOCb A SAFE S130.02 LOCK 6 GETS allse. SERVICE + 094899 COUNTY OF ORANGE $36.100.00 DISPOSAL GATE FEES 699900 COUNTY OF ORANGE S10.000.00 CLAIM 57-66-7B 0999C2 PACIFIC FARTS 61 N67.44 PUMP PARTS G9?9A5 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMEAI CC. SI.534.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES InI •1 D9 90N PRCTFTC BECE i$73 SO CELLULAR �., 099905 FARTCL CELLULAR 434.37 MECHANIC TELEPHONE SERVICES In1 099906 FARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $g34.37 MECHANICAL PARTS -�-- - -1 -- ----1 --T l44B 0] IEFYRIIED LRR pISfRIB0TI0R��J'_ w C9996b SAN W. PCTEAS01: S ASSOC. S7.770.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-I1-3 W 099909 PHOTO A SOUND CO. 33N1.60 OFFICE SUPPLICS 099911 PITNEY BONES $126.00 SCALE REPAIR n� 699912 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $163.30 HARDWARE s= 09991A POLYFURE. INC. 333.538.65 CATIONIC POLYMER H.0.3-8-89 Iw 09°915 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. 6312.5E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES d94917 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. S4.000.00 INS'IRIIMENTATION IMSP=ION M.0.8-10-all "' 4+1 099918 PULSAFEEDEP $481.05 PIRG PARTS ay.� R171'1 PUMP LhoINE'E0'f1T"""L !1 Lll:.l PNR PTIG m 1 09-12R QUALITY PUILOIMC SUPPLY 674.94 BUILDING MATERIALS vor 09-921 RAINBOW DISFOSAL CO. 3744.56 TRASH DISPOSAL PI0.3-22-88 099923 0.E0 WING SNCES S1BO.03 SAPEfY SHOES o 399924 REMECY TEMP S1.136.44 TEMPORARY SERVICES --099"971 E,, Aeeg26 TMF RESUPLIC SUFFLV CO. 31.214 PIPE 6 FITTINGS yl 0gg927 PICON COgF 3660.00 COPIES LEASES oaf 099929 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. 9211.305.58 CONSTRUCTION J-T-A 09°936 SANTA ARA ELECTRIC MOTORS $331.46 ELECTRIC MOTOR b9493 Y_ �a P99432 SEA-CIRO CLECTPONICS. INC. $6.565.00 OFFICE MACHINE P'I 1199933 SEA COAST DESIGNS $45.66 OFFICE REPAIRS My 1... 09°935 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS $416.00 COIL TESTING 4. 099936 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY 17.667.00 PERMIT PIECE SO I.E., TIP 102ts1 GO 1300 0 PlIlSpll 433043 • 199938 SGUTHERA CALIF. EDISON CO. 2364.673.59 POWER I11I..•ee 09?43q SO. CAL. GAS CO. $5,161.86 NATURAL GAS N^ IMM.P. -sin DBMS I.we' 09o94I SPARKLETTS ORINKINC•WATER 11.556.23 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RRITAL 1IIL....... �.� 099942 SPEC TECH WESTERN $332.84 WELDING SUPPLIES H+; �I he ..J FUND NO 9199 JT LIST WOPVINC CAPITAL PPOP.ESSING 007E 4/17/0° FA6F ' PEPORT NUPREP AP43 'a CLAIMS FAID 05/24/R9 POSTING DATE 05/24/89 a .I 699943 SPECIAL FLASTIC SYSTEMS, INC. $65.12 TUBING 09991y STAR OW STEEL 3232.91 XSEAL •�I 099946 STAR TOOL R SUPPLY CO. $498.69 TOOLS u 099916 SUMMIT STEEL 12.tl71.71 METAL 099^99 SUBSFT FORD 615•CI TRUCK PARTS u 099951 THE SUP PLI[AS $1,457.66 TOOLS/HARDWARE ;:I 099952 SURVIVAIR $325.61 ANNUAL INSPECTION RAINING .1 09995e TAYLOR-OUNN J $173.24 ELECTRIC CART PARTS wi bay 099995 TEEM-CCSSORIES S52.9V OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 99951 INER NO ANALYTICAL. INC./NO RC AL 672.04 LAB SERVICES 099956 TILLIM6MAST S1.100.30 CONSULTING SERVICES v X 09996L. TRUCK 3 AUT6 SUF P LT. .INC. 5919.94 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS f° W.,= 099a 61 J.G. TUCKER 3 SOL. INC. $6.675.16 ANALYZER PARTS ash 899963 UNITED PAP C E L•SERVICE 14 2.71 PARCEL SERVICES 6. 1 099964 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR $319.75 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Ibl.lb SAE IT SUPPLIES 099966 VVh SCIINT7FIC $6,722.79 US SUPPLIES iw LJ1 499967 VALLFT CITIES SUFFLY CO. $1.051.00 HARDWARE/FITTINGS .d 099969 VISTA PAINT CORP. f820.19 PAINT SUPPLIES yi 0999970 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE $2.716.09 SECURITY SERVICES .J 09-972 WILLPAN ASSCCIATE3 S21.242.34 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-2.2-27 �{ 0-9979 ROURKE L WCCDPUFF f32.613.51- LEGAL SERVICES M.O. 10-14-87 COPIER LEASES 9-975 GEORGE TA RDLEY ASSOCIATES $193.70 VALVE 099976 ARTHUR YOU h f• f5.993.00 PROPESSIONAL SERVICES ----------------- ICIAL CLAIPS PAID C5/24/P9 31,739,436.50 . ;I ry Imo' C� ~I' FUND NO 9199 - IT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/11/89 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP47 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY +i cu2xs PAID 4[B4_F9s;Ipc DAYC 0£LLt3s _ _ H i� a. . al UMMA0.Y • II OPER FUND f 16.56 •• BRFUNO____.. ! f2 F/R FUND 32.255.13 �. 1_. 03 OPER FUND l2,701.66 r 13 ADD.FUND-...____ 222,69 J /5 UP ER FOND L.OBB.55 n. i5 F/R FUND Pa_B6_OPER FUNK__... _872.01 16 AM FUND 8.145.69 n /fi FIR FUND 23,160.32 �•' n'u CPER FOND_ ..._.. _..... is ! 7 AD FUND 21.686.91 I7 P/R FUND 287.24 a ..#113 6O_POPEEOPER eB._NF2U.NNDD 4..06 f14 AM FUND 5 , 8.71 2895.70 .I 0566 AM FUND 2.680.70 / E FUND 35.42 7.I6TOPEEFUNn ''.. . 727 . U b. FUND836 7T OPER ND .25 .06 11 525 v' CORP 525.145145.878] I•' (71 SELP.NNOED.NOHCERiLOULINS IReucF vlixn _6,351 �I IT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 158.277.52 u + f1.709.436.50 I� I✓ Ix M' 14 M: rc� i i STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on , 19_n was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 19 % \. u IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this g day of 1989. Rita J. Brown, Secretary o each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California P�