HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-06-14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10944 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962-2411
+cicW
FAX(71 d)962-0388
June 8, 1989
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 8 14
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 - 7 :30 P,M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and
date.
secretary
Scheduled Upcoming Meetings :
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 28th, at 5 :00 p.m.
(Tentative)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 28th, at 5 : 30 p.m.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
d ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
109Ga EWB AVENUE
PO BOX 019
Po WM V4 .ME PA921 7
7"UM-tan
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings
June Jun 14, 1989 Jun 28, 1989
July Jul 12, 1989 Jul 26, 1989
LEM
August Aug 09, 1989 None Scheduled
September Sep 13, 2989 Sep 27, 1989
October Oct 11, 1989 Oct 25, 1989
November Nov 08, 1989 None Scheduled
December Dec 13, 1989 None Scheduled
January Jan 10, 1990 Jan 24, 1990
February Feb 14, 1990 Feb 28, 1990
March Mar 14, 1990 Mar 28, 1990
April Apr 11, 1990 Apr 25, 1990
May May 09, 1990 May 23, 1990
June Jun 13, 1990 Jun 27, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
d ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
June 7, 1989
104i ELLI6 aVEMIE
PO BOX 8127
�! FOUNTAIN MLEY.CAWOPMA 92728.9127
✓ '71419624411
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joint Chairman Don Smith
Members of Joint Boards of Directors
RE: Appeal of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143 Limitations
by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson
One of the conventional pollutants for which the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB)
establish limits in our NODES ocean discharge permit is biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD). In order to carry out both the Federal Pretreatment Regulations
and the provisions of the Districts' industrial waste ordinance, staff has
established a maximum 10,000 pound per day average limit for large 60D
dischargers to our sewerage system.
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson (B/H-W) , located in Fullerton, has appealed the 10,000
pound limit imposed on their tomato processing plant discharge. They are the
third industrial discharger that has been subject to the limitation, but the
first to refuse to comply.
We have been advised by several Directors and other members of the political and
business communities that they have received separate communications from the
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson interests regarding this issue. Most of these have not
been officially transmitted to the Districts, but from what we have seen it
appears as if rather than relying purely on the facts to make their case, and
have it presented at a hearing before the District 3 Board of Directors,
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson has felt compelled to resort to a rather vigorous campaign
of inflammatory misinformation.
The District has chosen not to engage in this pre-hearing rhetoric nor respond
or attempt to correct those statements while this appeal is pending. Our
arguments will be made before the District 3 Board at its hearing, after which
a report will be given to all Directors. We do believe, however, that all
Directors should at least have the outline of the issues and procedures.
Basically, the dispute is as follows:
• Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson questions the authority and propriety of the
District staff imposing a BOD limitation and requiring pretreatment
of their industrial discharge and a reduction of BOO from their cannery.
B/H-W further contends that the District's action amounts to a "taking"
of their property.
• The District's staff maintains that there is clear federal , state and
�.J loca au or y and, in fact, a mandate to implement industrial waste
discharge limitations and pretreatment requirements. Nationally,
changing environmental standards have required both public (POTW's) and
private (356 firms in Orange County) dischargers to reduce pollution
(including BOO) by the installation of pretreatment equipment, but B/H-W
has refused to clean up their waste.
Joint Chairman Smith/Board Members
Re: Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson
June 7, 1989
Page Two
At their April 12th meeting, the District 3 Board received and filed the appeal
by B/H-W, and also established rules of procedure for conducting the hearing.
At the May 10th meeting, hearing of the appeal was fixed for the regular June 14
Board Meeting.
Copies of the extensive appeal documents formally filed by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson
have been submitted to the District 3 Directors as have copies of the Districts'
response documents.
At the hearing the appeal will be presented by counsel representing
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson. The response will be presented by the Districts' General
Counsel , representing staff.
As reported to the Directors by memorandum of April 21, 1989, the District has
engaged attorney B. Richard Marsh of the Los Angeles law firm of Knapp, Marsh,
Jones and Doran to act as legal counsel to the District 3 Board during the
hearing to avoid any legal conflict wherein B/ W could argue that they did not
receive a fair hearing or due process*e; al
Pger
JWs:sc
C � }
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P.O. fox 8127. 10844 EIIIs Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
-� JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 14, 1989 - 7 : 30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government
Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written
materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is
proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or
action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or
as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
( 2) Roll call
( 3 ) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts
of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if
any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards
on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
( 6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel
present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general
interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chairman
`J (b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
6/14/89
(7) EACH DISTRICT
ACTIONS no corrections or amendments are made, the
following minutes will be deemed approved as `
mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman:
District 1 - May 10, 1989 regular,
May 17, 1989 adjourned, and
June 1, 1989 adjourned
District 2 - May 10, 1989 regular, and
May 17, 1989 adjourned
District 3 - May 10, 1989 regular, and
May 17, 1989 adjourned
District 5 - May 10, 1989 regular,
May 17, 1989 adjourned, and
May 31, 1989 adjourned
District 6 - May 10, 1989 regular,
May 17, 1989 adjourned, and
May 31, 1989 adjourned
District 7 - May 10, 1989 regular, and
May 17, 1989 adjourned
District 11 - May 10, 1989 regular,
May 17, 1989 adjourned, and
June 7, 1989 adjourned
District 13 - May 10, 1989 regular, and
May 17, 1989 adjourned
District 14 - May 10, 1989 regular, and
May 17, 1989 adjourned
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Cons e�=on of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of
claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows:
(Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will
be regarded as the same for each District represented unless
a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any
District. ) See pages "A" and "B"
5/10/89 5/24/89
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 752,470.45 S 836,257.06
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 4,616,703.09 525,145.87
Joint Working Capital Fund - 186,147.44 158,233.52
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 8,550.72 6,356.25
DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 16.56
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 257,299.64 36,338.50
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 374,794.43 13,024.35
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 25,597.78 4,244.55
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 10,895.43 32,146.04
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 100,294.96 26,428.67
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 1,918.21 6,585.25
DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- 4.08
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 69,771 .56 56,258.71
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 8 6 JOINT - 851,916.41 5,576.40' l I
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - -0- 35.42 fir'
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 6 14 JOINT - 689.14 2,765.27
$7,257,049.26 $1,709,436.50
-2-
p. � 6/14/89
(9 ) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(w)
1 matters placed on the consent calendar are
considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is
requested to be removed from the consent calendar by
a Director, staff member, or member of the public in
attendance, there will be no separate discussion of
these items. All items on the consent calendar will
be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included
on the consent calendar. All items removed from the
consent calendar shall be considered in the regular
order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item
from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by
the chair, state their name, address and designate
by letter the item to be removed from the consent
calendar.
The Chairman will determine if any items are to be
deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items
appearing on the consent calendar not specifically
removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding
Purchase of Twenty-Six (26) Four-Wheel Electric
Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-145, to
W. T. Hillard, Inc. in the total amount of
$116,220.00 plus sales tax. See page "C"
(b) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding
Purchase of One 2'h-Ton Crane-Mounted, Flat Bed
Truck, Specification No. A-147, to Ole Lee, Inc.
in the total amount of $39 ,842.00 plus sales tax.
See page "D"
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue
Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 38042
issued to Continental Graphics for additional
printing services required to print "Action Plan"
Draft Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan, increasing the total authorized amount
from $41,500.00 to $49,443.70, including tax.
-3-
6/14/89
(9) ALL DISTRICTS. - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8
to the plans and specifications for Administration
Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an
addition of $29,180.00 to the contract with
J. R. Roberts Corporation for 11 items of additional
work including flagpole illumination, substitution
of aluminum expansion joint screed joints for
platic screeds, additional electrical circuitry and
ventilation ducting in kitchens; additional bathroom
lighting soffits; and additional valves on HVAC
system; and granting a time extension of 12 calendar
days for completion of said additional work. See
page "E"
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 16 to the plans and specifications for Ocean
Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15, authorizing an addition of $36,700.00 to
the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for
11 items of miscellaneous additional work including
modification of locker-room showers and restrooms
for handicapped persons; miscellaneous modifications
to walkways and ladders; installation of safety
handrail at termination channel; modification of
roof slope; installation of separate grounding for
DACS computer control system and replacement of
current breakers; removal of undisclosed underground
obstructions; and installation of dryers in the air
system and other miscellaneous changes; and granting
a time extension of seven calendar days for
completion of said additional work. Seepage "F"
(f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. I
to the plans and specifications for Warehouse and
Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing
Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an addition
of $30,857.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts
Corporation for modifications to the water
facilities inspection trench required by the City of
Fountain Valley, and removal of unsuitable building
foundation soil; and granting a time extension of
19 calendar days for completion of said additional
work. See page "G"
(g) Consideration of motion approving Change order
No. 18 to the plans and specifications for Headworks
No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition
of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler;
Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of
$82,028.20 to the contract with Xiewit Pacific Co.
for eight items of additional work including removal
of undisclosed obstructions; removal of temporary
paving; additional chlorine piping in future bar
screen channels; installation of a
District-furnished influent pump; reinforcement
modifications in Tunnel No. 4 at the bar screen and
pump room structures; substitution of wall panels at
chlorine area to accommodate future storage tank
changes; and modification of architectural finish to
the building exterior concrete surfaces throughout.
See page "H"
-4-
F tl
6/14/89
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(h) Consideration of the following actions relative to
Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit
Facility "B" , Billings Tunnel and Distribution
Structure "A" , Job No. P2-34:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change order
No. 13 to the plans and specifications for said
job, authorizing an addition of $98,811.72 to
the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc.
for four items of additional work including
caustic pump power modifications; additional
costs due to District-requested delays re
modifications to "H" and "I" scrubbers to
accommodate ongoing odor control operations;
improvements to the steam shunt piping system;
and additional asphaltic concrete curb and
trench paving; and granting a time extension of
121 calendar days for completion of said
additional work. See page ^I"
(2) Consideration of motion approving Change order
No. 14 to the plans and specifications for said
job, authorizing an addition of $96 ,311.08 to
the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc.
for five items of additional work including
modifications to the Plant 1 scrubber complex
drain; construction of concrete pad at diesel
tank fueling areas at Building 4 at Plant No. 1
and removal of deteriorated asphaltic concrete
paving; modifications to foul air ductwork at
Headworks "C" to accommodate the new Conveyor
Building; installation of methane sensors in
each of 17 primary basin dome enclosures; and
rerouting of existing 10-inch digester cleaning
line around the new 48-inch foul air line. See
page J.
(i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2
to the plans and specifications for Entrances, Site,
Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-27, authorizing a net addition of
$26,462.14 to the contract with Riewit Pacific Co.
for eight items of miscellaneous additions and
deletions including security fencing modifications;
relocation of telephone conduit; existing manhole
modifications and repairs; installation of concrete
thrust block on waste hauler drain line;
installation of restroom facility for the guard
shack at the new main entrance; deletion of the
Motor control Center in the Metering and Diversion
Structure; and deletion and modification of asphalt
paving, concrete and piping at the waste Hauler Dump
Station. See page "A"
-5-
o ,
6/14/89
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(j ) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2
to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous
Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing a net
addition of $33,600.00 to the contract with Ziebarth
6 Alper for seven items of additional work including
rerouting of existing gas and water lines at new
meter structure "A" ; modifications to new
containment facility at dewatering building;
increasing ball valve size from 6" to 8" for 20
valves for Digesters "A" and "B" ; deletion of a new
catch basin which will be incorporated into a future
project; rerouting high strength sludge piping and
connections at Digesters "C" "D" "F., and "G", and
exploratory utility location excavation of
underground high strength sludge piping system. See
page "L"
(k) Consideration of the following actions relative to
Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting
Engineers for design of Central Power Generation
Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for design of a
steam turbine system to be incorporated into the
project to take advantage of engine heat to produce
additional electricity:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee certification
of the final negotiated fee for said services.
See page "M"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-51,
approving said Addendum No. 4 to said Agreement
with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers
for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for
labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a
total amount not to exceed $68,972.00,
increasing the total authorized compensation
from $3,592,838 .00 to an amount not to exceed
$3,661,810.00. See page "N"
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-52, approving
Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Jones a Stokes Associates, Inc. for
preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for
the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Element of the
Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan Programmatic EIR, providing for a reallocation
of the costs among categories within said agreement,
with no change in the maximum authorized
compensation of $213,126 .00. See page "0"
-6-
6/14/89
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(m) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the
�✓ Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro
Consulting Engineers for design of Primary Clarifiers
Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-33, to provide for relocation of the
effluent junction box and polymer facility, realignment
of Fuentes Road, and modifications to the equipment and
scum trough hatches on the primary clarifiers.
(n) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager
to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to
attend and participate in meetings, hearings,
conferences facility inspections and other functions
which, in his opinion, will be of value to the
Districts or affect the Districts ' interests,
including, but not limited to, those conducted by state
and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the
California Association of Sanitation Agencies,
California water Pollution Control Association,
Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the
Water Pollution Control Federation; and authorizing
reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental
expenses in accordance with existing Districts'
policies and the approved annual budget for 1989-90.
(o) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager
to execute an agreement with the County of Orange for
Data Processing Center services relative to collection
of the Districts' annual supplemental user fees
(estimated annual processing cost is $42,000)
(p) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of
Temporary Permit for Groundwater Cleanup No. 1-23
issued to the County of Orange John Wayne Airport,
extending said permit from July 11, 1989 to July 10,
1990, to allow the continued emergency discharge of
contaminated groundwater from John Wayne Airport to the
District's sewer for an additional one-year period in
order to complete construction of the Michelson Bridge
included in the general airport expansion project.
(q) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue
purchase orders to soils, concrete and materials
testing firms for services required, beginning June 15,
1989, for the Districts' construction projects over the
next two years, as follows:
Total
Amount not
To to exceed
- Smith-Emery Company $200,000
- Twining Laboratories of 200,000
Southern California, Inc.
- H.V. Lawmaster 6 Company, Inc. 100,000
- Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. 50,000
- Soils and Testing Engineers, Inc. 50,000
-7-
6/14/89
(9) DISTRICT 2 (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(r) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-59-2, approving
plans and specifications for North Branch of the
Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer, 1
Contract No. 2-11-3, and authorizing the General
Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids
(Tentative bid date is July 18, 1989) . See page
"P"
DISTRICT 3
(s) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 5 to the plans and specifications for
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (vault)
Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract
No. 3-28R-1, authorizing an addition of
$72,500.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich
Construction Company for payment of bonus for
early completion of specified manholes and
rehabilitation of one additional manhole; and
granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for
completion of said additional work. See page
"O"
DISTRICTS 5 6 6
(t) Consideration of the following actions relative
to the contract for Replacement of Portions of
Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications
for said contract, authorizing an addition
of $163,677 .00 to the contract with
Christeve Corporation for additional work
due to undisclosed utilities; installation
of three additional pressure access tees and
manholes; removal of contaminated soil;
change in grade for now 36" line to
accommodate utility lines; additional
asphalt paving and backfill due to
undisclosed 27-inch force main; and payment
of bonus for early completion of contract.
See page "R"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-60,
accepting said contract as complete,
authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. See page Is.,
-8-
6/14/89
(9) DISTRICTS 6, 7 8 14 (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(u) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-62, approving
�..i and accepting Grant of Easement from Rancho Tomas,
Inc. , a California Corporation, formerly Apollo
Development Corporation, a California Corporation,
required in connection with construction and
perpetual right-of-way needed relative to the
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to
Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A; and authorizing
payment of $37,700.00 plus costs for said
right-of-way. See page ^T^
DISTRICTS 7 8 14
(v) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-64, approving
agreement with the City of Costa mesa for a
cooperative project to include City street
improvements to Baker Street, between Bristol Street
and Fairview Road, in the District's contract for
construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor,
from Bristol Street t0 Fairview Road, Contract
No. 14-1-1B; and providing for reimbursement to the
District by City for their share of the costs of
said joint project. See page U.
DISTRICT 7
(w) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to negotiate a Professional Services
Agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for
design of the Campus Relief Sewer, between
Jamboree Boulevard and Von Barman Avenue,
Contract No. 7-13 .
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration ern of action on items deleted from Consent
Calendar, if any
...
-9-
6/14/89
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Nom a one for Joint Chairman (Election to be held at
regular July Board Meeting)
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Coca or on of the following actions relative to Sludge
Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-34-2:
(a) Verbal staff report
(b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plane and specifications for said project making
miscellaneous modifications and clarifications.
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-53, receiving and
filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding
contract for said project to Advanco Constructors,
Division of aura Constructors, Inc. in the amount of
$19,085,600.00. Sae page °V°
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
o�mi e�can of the following actions relative to NPDES
Ocean Monitoring Program:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve
Report and Recommendation for WERE Ocean Monitoring
Program Year Five (1989-90) and Selection Committee
Certification of the negotiated fee for Amendment No. 6
to Agreement with Science Applications International
Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract
Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfoll,
Specification No. 5-032 (Copy enclosed with Directors-
agenda material).
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-54, approving
Amendment NO. 6 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean
Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch
Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, extending the
contract from July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990, for an
amount not to exceed $1,609,570.00 for the fifth year of
said contract (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda
material).
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to
administer a Portion of the Year Five NPDES Ocean
Monitoring Program (Specification No. 5-032-1),
previously performed by Science Applications
International Corporation, for monthly and quarterly
water quality sampling and analyses, semi-annual benthic
bioaccumulation sampling, quarterly data submittal and
the October 30th Annual Data Submission Report, for an
estimated cost of $180,120.00, and authorizing
incorporation of the following separate outside
contractual services not to exceed $130,300.00, for a
total estimated, staff-administered amount of
$319,420.00, said work to be implemented pursuant to
Districts' staffing, equipment and project budgetary
authorizations and procurement regulations:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve proposal of Southern California Coastal
Water Research Project (SCCWRP) dated April 19,
1989, to provide ocean current monitoring and
modeling services and prepare a Year Five Ocean
Currents Report (Specification No. 5-032-1A) for a
total amount not to exceed $90,300.00 (Copy
enclosed with Directors' agenda material) .
(2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve proposal of ScoAnalysis, Inc. dated May 24,
1909, to assist staff with data handling and
preparation of required quarterly ODES Reports
(Specification No. 5-032-18) for a total amount not
to exceed $40,000.00 (Copy enclosed with Directors'
agenda material).
-10-
,. 6/14/89
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy
Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file
and approve the Committees' actions and written report
of the meeting on May 24, 1989 (Copy enclosed with
Directors' agenda material) .
(b) Consideration of action on items recommended by said
Committees:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the
Committees' report and recommendations re 1989-90
personnel requirements and joint works operating
and construction budgets.
(2) Consideration of actions re personnel requirements:
(a) Consideration of motion approving 1989-90
personnel requirements
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-55,
amending Classification and Compensation
Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1989-90
personnel requirements
(3) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1989-90
Joint Operating Budget Funds, as follows:
Fund Total Amount
Joint Operating/working Capital $46,581,000
Workers- Compensation Self-Insured 210,000
Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 1,373,000
Public Liability Self-Insured 321,000
(4) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1989-90
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORP Joint
works Construction) in the total amount of
$102,725,000.
(5) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing
the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate proposals
obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and
to place Excess Workers' Compensation insurance
coverage effective July 1, 1989; said action to be
submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or
revision at the regular meeting on July 12, 1989.
(6) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-56, amending
Rules of Procedure Resolution No. 87-51 re
Executive Committee membership. See page "w"
(7) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-57, approving
Amendment No. 10 to Agreement Employing General
Counsel. See page "X"
(8) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-66, amending
Classification and Compensation Resolution
No. 79-20, as amended, re Management and
Supervisory Classifications' salary range
adjustments, pursuant to the Districts' Management
Performance Review Program (MPRP)
-11-
6/14/89 {
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of
Finance to certify claims and forward to the Orange County
auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred
after June 30, 1989, and declaring that such certification
shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10
pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the
Districts until the 1989-90 budgets are adopted by the
respective Districts.
(16 ) ALL DISTRICTS
Closed Session: During the course of conducting the
siness sat orth on this agenda as a regular
meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the
Boards in closed session to consider matters of
pending or potential litigation, or personnel
matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9
or 54957.6.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real
property; (b) matters of pending or potential
litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are
exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards
during a permitted closed session and are not
available for public inspection. At such time as
final actions are taken by the Directors on any of
these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session
(c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered
in closed session.
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Ot ei— business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(18) DISTRICT 2
Ot er business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(20) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(21 ) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-12-
6/14/89
(22) DISTRICT 13
0 er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(23) DISTRICT 13
Condon of motion to adjourn
(24) DISTRICT 14
OEher mess and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(26) DISTRICT 1
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve
Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee Report for Fiscal
Year 1989-90, dated June 1, 1989. See page "Y"
(b) Public hearing re proposed Ordinance No. 112, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111: See page
"Z.
(1) Open hearing
(2) Verbal report of General Counsel
( 3) Oral public comments, if any
(4) Staff response to oralcomments
(5) Close hearing
(c) Consideration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111 :
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance
No. 112 by title only and waive reading of said
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 112.
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-58-1, directing
the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer
service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant
\� to Ordinance No. 112 of County Sanitation District
No. 1 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90
fiscal year. See page "AA"
-13-
6/14/89
(27) DISTRICT 1
0 E eeriness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 1 `
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(29) DISTRICT 5
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve
Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee Report for Fiscal
Year 1989-90, dated May 31, 1989. See page "BB"
(b) Public hearing re proposed Ordinance No. 519, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: See page "CC"
(1) Open hearing
(2) verbal report of General Counsel
.( 3) Oral public comments, if any
(4) Staff response to oral comments
(5) Close hearing
(c) Consideration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance
No. 519 by title only and waive reading of said
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 519.
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-61-5, directing
the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer
service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant
to Ordinance No. 519 of County Sanitation District
No. 5 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90
fiscal year. See page "DD"
(30) DISTRICT 5
O er siness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 31) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-14-
6/14/89
(32) DISTRICT 6
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve
Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee Report for Fiscal
Year 1989-90, dated May 31, 1989. See page "EE"
(b) Public hearing re proposed Ordinance No. 613, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 612: See page "FF"
(1) Open hearing
(2) verbal report of General Counsel
(3) Oral public comments, if any
(4) Staff response to oral comments
(5) Close hearing
(c) Consideration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 613, An Ordinance of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 612:
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance
No. 613 by title only and waive reading of said
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 613.
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 89-63-6, directing
the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer
service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant
to Ordinance No. 613 of County Sanitation District
No. 6 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90
fiscal year. See page "GG"
( 33) DISTRICT 6
others siness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any -
( 34) DISTRICT 6
Con side—ration of motion to adjourn
( 35) DISTRICT 11
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve
�J Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee Report for Fiscal
Year 1989-90, dated June 7, 1989. See page "HH"
[ITEM (35) CONTINUED ON PAGE 16)
-15-
6/14/89
( 35) DISTRICT 11 (Continued from page is)
(b) Public hearing re proposed Ordinance No. 1109, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: See page ^II^
(1) Open hearing
(2) Verbal report of General Counsel
(3 ) Oral public comments, if any
(4) Staff response to oral comments
(5) Close hearing
(c) Consideration of the following actions relative to
proposed Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges:
(1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance
No. 1109 by title only and waive reading of said
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present) .
(2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting
Ordinance No. 1109.
(d) Consideration Of Resolution NO. 89-65-11, directing
the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer
service charges On the property tax bills , pursuant
to Ordinance No. 1109 of County Sanitation District
No. 11 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90
fiscal year. See page ^Jill
( 36) DISTRICT 11
0 E e �ness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 37) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
( 38) DISTRICT 3
(a) RECESS (approximately 5-10 minutes)
(b) RECONVENE 1 '
Via✓
-16-
6/14/89
(39) DISTRICT 3
Consi eration of Appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. of
Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143: (Mailed to
Active Directors only UNDER SEPARATE COVER)
(a) Open hearing
(1) Presentation of historical background of
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. site and Industrial
Waste Discharge Permit
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Appeal
of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. dated March 22, 1989
re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143.
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file
Itemization of Items of Evidence dated May 22,
1969 re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit
No. 3-1-143.
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file
Statement of Facts and Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Support of Appeal dated May 23,
1989 re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit
No. 3-1-143, including:
(a) Declaration of James N. Williams
(b) Declaration of Robert C. Thomas
(c) Declaration of John Baird
(5) Consideration of motion to receive and file
Statement of Facts and Memorandum of Paints and
Authorities In Opposition to Appeal of
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. dated June 2, 1989 re
Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143.
(6) Consideration of motion to receive and file
Itemization of Items of Evidence dated June 2,
1989 re Industrial waste Discharge Permit
No. 3-1-143, including:
(a) Declaration of Richard W. von Langan
(b) Declaration of Stephen C. Hough
(c) Declaration of David Jenkins
(d) Declaration of Kelly Christensen
(a) Declaration of Blake Anderson
(7) Oral presentation by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc.
(8) District's oral response to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson's
appeal by General Counsel
(b) Close hearing
(c) Discussion by Directors
(d) Consideration of action by Directors to affirm, modify
or reverse staff decision re permit limitations
(40) DISTRICT 3
O-der Tiusiness and communications or supplemental agenda
�.►� items, if any
(41) DISTRICT 3
Consi eration of motion to adjourn
-17-
I' MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone:(714) 962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
Meeting Date
June 14, 1989 at 7:30 p.m.
The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine
items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise
self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material
summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
9(a) : AWARD PURCHASE OF TWENTY-SIX (26) FOUR-WHEEL ELECTRIC CARGO CARRIERS,
SPECIFICATION NO. A-145.
The Districts' present-day motor pool consists of 278 vehicles comprised
of 190 trucks, various pieces of heavy equipment and automobiles. The remaining
88 are electric carts. As part of an ongoing effort of evaluating our
operations to assure that we are being as efficient as possible, staff has
studied our motor pool and determined that 54 existing or needed vehicles are
used only for transporting workers, equipment and tools within the confines of
the treatment plants (each treatment plant site is over 100 acres in size) and
do not need to travel on the public streets. We estimate that replacing these
vehicles with electric carts will save approximately $27,000 per year. It would
have the added benefit of reducing vehicular air emissions.
Accordingly, staff has prepared specifications for 26 electric cargo
carriers and 28 electric personnel carriers. Thirty-seven of the carts will
replace existing high-mileage vehicles that are ready for retirement, and 17 are
needed because of the rapidly expanding treatment facilities at the two plant
sites.
Three bids were received for the 26 cargo carts. It is recommended that
award of Twenty-six (26) Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No.
A-145, be made to W. T. Billard, Inc. , low bidder, for their proposed amount of
$116,220.00, plus sales tax. A bid tabulation is attached to the supporting
agenda material .
The personnel carriers are being bid under separate specifications and a
recommendation for purchase of the personnel carts will be forthcoming at a
future Board meeting.
-1-
June 14, 1989
9(b): PURCHASE OF ONE 2-1/2-TON CRANE-MOUNTED FLAT BED TRUCK, SPECIFICATION
N . A-147.
The two treatment plants and 33 outlying pump stations have thousands of
pieces of equipment that must be periodically removed for maintenance or repair
work. For the largest equipment, we generally rent cranes with a capacity of up
to 20 tons. However, most of the equipment can be most efficiently handled by
smaller, Districts'-owned cranes.
Our sewerage facilities are rapidly expanding and it is necessary to
acquire an additional truck-mounted 2-1/2-ton crane to accommodate the
increasing maintenance and repair work.
On May 16, 1989, staff received four sealed bids for One 2-1/2-Tan Crane-
mounted, Flat Bed Truck, Specification No. A-147. Staff recommends award be
made to Ole Lee, Inc. of E1 Monte for their low bid amount of $39,842.00, plus
sales tax. A bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material .
9(c) : CONSIDERATION OF MOTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PURCHASE ORDER
CONTRACT WITH CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS FOR ADDITIONAL PRINTING REQUIRED FOR
ACTION PLAN DOCUMENTS.
In February the Directors authorized the issuance of a purchase order to
Continental Graphics of Irvine in the amount of $41,500.00 for printing the
draft Wastewater Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan and
Executive Summary. The purchase order was issued after receipt of informal bids
• from several printers for each document. Quantities were based on estimates of
printing which' included text, maps, graphics and binding. At that time the
documents were not in final farm. The final report had more pages than
originally anticipated. The extra charges were added printing of additional
pages, revisions, additional color reproductions and changes in binding.
Additional printing was required, therefore, staff recommends the
Directors authorize issuance of Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 38042
issued to Continental Graphics, increasing the total authorized amount from
$41,500.00 to $49,443.70 including sales tax, a $7,943.70 increase.
9(d) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 TO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION,
JOB NO. J-7-4.
Job No. J-7-4, Administration Building Addition, includes the
construction of additional administration building space and remodeling of the
existing administration building and addition of two new parking areas at a cost
of $3,549,000.00. Change Order No. 8 adds $29,180.00 and 12 calendar days to
the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation.
Item 1 adds illumination to the flagpoles in front of the new South
Wing at the request of the Districts' representative and project architect to
allow continuous flag display, for an additional cost of $2,800.00. The
flagpole lighting was not shown on the contract plans. Item 2 provides
additional chilled water piping supports for the HVAC piping requested by the
project structural engineer at an added cost of $331.00. The pipe supports were
not shown on the contract plans. Item 3 adds a 480-volt hot water circuit to
serve a new hot water heater, and addition of two map light receptacles in the
-2-
June 14, 1989
new Board room. These items were not shown on the contract plans and add a cost
of $1,979.00. Item 4 changes building exterior vertical plaster screed joints
from plastic to aluminum and adds additional aluminum moldings. in the soffits
and around all the exterior doors and windows. The plastic screeds are no
longer manufactured. This item resulted 1n an additional cost of $11,110.00.
Item 5 directs the contractor to modify the ceiling framing in the New
South Wing entrance lobby to provide adequate clearance for heating and
ventilating ductwork. This modification was requested by the Districts at an
added cost of $813.00. Item 6 adds new appliance and convenience outlet
circuitry for the kitchens in the new South Wing that was not shown on the
contract plans. This additional circuitry was added to provide power for new
kitchen appliances selected by the Districts and project architect, and for
convenience outlets, at an added cost of $5,287.00.
Item 7 adds a cost of $862.00 for reinforcement of shear panels around
the perimeter of the Board Room in the new South Wing, requested by the project
structural engineer, at locations penetrated by heating and ventilating
ductwork. This reinforcement detail was not shown on the contract plans.
Item 8 adds ventilation ductwork for the two kitchen range hoods in the new
South Wing, requested by the project architect, at an added cost of $1,214.00.
The ductwork was not shown on the contract drawings. Item 9 provides for the
installation of furring strips at various interior and exterior wall locations
to provide a continuous straight surface for drywall or stucco installation.
This item was not shown on the contract drawings and was requested by the
Districts' project architect at an added cost of $630.00. Item 10 adds soffits
and additional lighting over the vanity countertops in the three new South Wing
bathrooms. This change was requested by the project architect and the Districts
to provide more lighting in the bathrooms. The new soffit details were not
shown on the contract drawings and this additional work performed by the
contractor is at an added cost of $2,577.00. Item 11 provides for installation
of valves on the heating and ventilation system hot and cold water lines. The
valves were requested by the project mechanical engineer in order to isolate the
new South Wing from the existing Administration Building. This change will
allow separate start-up and shut-down of each wing without affecting the other.
This additional work cost $1,577.00 and was not shown on the contract drawings.
Staff is reviewing these and other changes with the project designer to
clarify responsibility for certain items, excluding plan omissions, which were
not replacements.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 8 adding $29,180.00 and 12
calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation.
9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 16 TO OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT
PLANT N -1 .
The new $28.5 million master-planned Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at
Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, is being built under several contracts. It includes
five pumps, each capable of pumping 120 mild to the outfall . The capacity of the
station is 480 mild with four pumps operating (the fifth pump is a standby, spare
pump). Change Order No. 16 adds $36,700.00 and seven calendar days to the
contract.
-3-
June 14, 1989
Item 1 is the inclusion of handicapped persons showers, toilets and other
fixtures in employee locker room areas, omitted from the original plans and
specifications, at a cost of $8,815.00. Item 2 is the installation of a closure
section between the walkway and east side of the pump station to alleviate a
possible safety hazard, at a cost of $534.00. Item 3 is for relocations to
avoid an interference problem between water piping, the heat pump and doorway in
the utility room, at a cost of $968.00. Item 4 provides for five miscellaneous
modifications to eliminate various conflicts including an interference between
light fixtures and the bulkhead storage rack, removal of a section of walkway
support interfering with the bulkhead placed in a storage rack, modifications to
ladders to conform to OSHA codes, relocation of electrical switches interfering
with the ladders, modifications to bridge crane ladders interfering with the
structure, and additional seals for a bulkhead, at a cost of $12,364.00.
Item 5 is the installation of a safety handrail at the termination
channel at the demolished Rothrock Building to eliminate a potential safety
hazard, at a cost of $2,014.00. Item 6 is elimination of a ponding condition on
the roof caused by a conflict between the roof slope and an access hatch, at a
cost of $2,081.00. Item 7 is the installation of a separate grounding system to
protect the computer controls and replacing current breakers for sump pump
motors, at a cost of $3,398.00 and a 7-calendar day time extension. Item 8 is
the cost of modifications to avoid unknown underground obstructions encountered
while driving concrete piling at the pipe supports near Rothrock Pump Station,
or removal of the obstructions, at a cost of $4,093.00. Item 9 is the
installation of an air dryer in the air lines operating the variable air volume
dampers to improve their operating efficiency and decrease future maintenance,
at a cost of $1,663.00. Item 10 is the installation of acoustical paneling on
the west wall of the basement on a small area designated for a future doorway
(that will be completed under another contract) , at a cost of $449.00. Item it
Is the extra cost of a new platform grating fastener that will facilitate the
removal of said grating for maintenance purposes at a cost of $321.00. Bolts
were originally specified.
Most of the above described changes are considered by staff to be
corrections which would have been included in the original design if discovered
or known prior to its completion. Item 4 includes changes made after the fact
and applicable back charges will be made to the designer. None of the items are
for replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 16 adding $36,700.00 to the
contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. There is a 7-calendar day time
extension associated with this change order.
9(f) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, AND
IL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20.
Job No. J-20, Warehouse and Maintenance Building, and oil Storage and
Dispensing Improvements, includes the construction of eight new warehouse and
maintenance buildings, remodeling of the existing oil storage facility and
upgrading of the site paving, storm drain and fire protection systems, at a cost
of $3,266,000.00. Change Order No. I adds $30,857.00 and 19 calendar days to
the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation.
-4-
June 14, 1989
Item 1 modifies the requirements for an inspection trench required by the
City of Fountain Valley for verification of the city water system pipelines
serving Plant No. 1. This verification was agreed to by the Districts as a
condition for the City of Fountain Valley to provide a direct water service
connection to the Administration Building, Warehouse and Shop areas, all north
of the new east/west (North Perimeter) plant circulation road. This item
resulted In an additional cost of $10,529.00
Item 2 is to remove and dispose of unsuitable soil found during grading
and recompaction under areas for Buildings 5 and 6 in order to provide a stable
pad for construction of the new buildings, at an added cost of $20,328.00. This
work was directed by the Districts' sails consultant.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which would have been Included in the original design if discovered or known
prior to its completion. None of the items are for replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $30,857.00 and 19
calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation.
9(g): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 18 TO HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NO. P1- , AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMENT
OF B ILER; PIPIN LEANOUTS; AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 2,
JOB NO. P1- 1.
Jab No. P1-20, Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P1-31,
Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts;
and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new 140
million gallon per day influent pumping plant and preliminary treatment
facilities at a cost of $31,458,000.00, the largest single project ever awarded
by the Districts. Change Order No. 18 adds $82,028.20 to the contract.
This change order includes eight items of work for Job No. P1-20.
Item 1, for $1,967.00, and Item 2, for $2,296.00, are for the removal of
undisclosed concrete obstructions at the Middle Road and new Power Building
No. 3A. The unknown underground obstructions conflicted with asphalt paving
grades and were not shown on the contract plans. Item 3, for $1,652.00, is for
the removal of temporary asphalt paving on the North Perimeter Road. The
temporary paving was installed under another contract to maintain continuous
access to the existing main entrance. The removal was necessary before the
second phase of permanent paving could be installed for the North Perimeter
Road. Item 4, for $3,550.00, is for additional chlorine piping at the influent
bar screen channels designated for future use. Installing the additional piping
now eliminates the need for an extensive plant shut down in the future when
these channels are activated.
Item 5, for $15,364.00, is for the placement of the future 70 mgd fifth
influent pump on the pad in the headworks pump room. The fifth pump was
previously purchased by the Districts as a spare or for future use and not
furnished under this contract. Installation of this pump at its designed
location at this time eliminates the need for a more costly relocation in the
future and will also save warehouse storage space. Although the pump will be
bolted to the pad, it is not connected. Item 6, for $7,079.20, is for
`. reinforcement modifications at Tunnel No. 4 and at the bar screen and pump room
structures. The structural section specified for Tunnel No. 4 on the contract
plans had to be modified to satisfy design loading criteria.
-5-
June 14, 1989
Item 7, for $7,997.00, is to substitute removable panels for permanent
panels in front of the bulk chlorine tank facility to accommodate the future
installation and removal of bulk chlorine storage tanks. Item 8 is for
architectural concrete finish modifications for $42,123.00. The Headworks is a
dominant structure at the new Plant No. 1 entrance. The original plans called
for a sandblasted finish to the structures. However, it was subsequently deemed
more appropriate to provide an architectural finish to match other major
facilities within the treatment plant site. The exterior finish of the concrete
structures was rubbed with a dry mortar to obtain an architecturally harmonious
finish. The finish modifications will produce a uniform, smooth, flat
architectural finish to all concrete exposed to view. The net added cost
reflects a deduction for the specified sandblasting.
The above-described modifications are considered by staff to be
corrections or changes which would have been included in the original design if
discovered or known prior to completion of design. None of the items are for
replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 18 for a net addition of
$82,028.20 and no additional time to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co.
9(h): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 13 AND 14 TO COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB
NO. P1-26; COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT N0 2 JOB N0. P2-32; FOUL
AIR RUBBER SYSTEMS AT PLAN N , JOB NO. P2-. ; AND IMPROVEMENTS TO
GRIT FACILITY "B" BILLINGS JUNNLL AND DISTRIBUTI N STRUCTURE "A" , JOB
NU. P -34.
In September 1987, the Directors awarded a contract for construction of
odor control facilities at Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Jobs Nos. P1-25,
P1-26, P2-32, P2-33, and P2-34 which provides for domes over all primary
clarifier basins, as well as associated work. The malodorous air will be
collected and deodorized. When this $20 million project is completed, the
consulting engineer believes that odors will be reduced by 95% at the treatment
plants.
(1) Change Order No. 13
Change Order No. 13 provides for four items of miscellaneous work, a
time extension of 121 calendar days and adds $98,811.72 to the contract.
Item 1, in the amount of $55,387.00, provides for the addition of
electrical equipment, controls and wiring that when installed at each
complex will be utilized to furnish power to the caustic feed pumps at
the three scrubber complexes. The original source of power for the
caustic feed pump was the scrubber control panel , but that was found to
be inadequate to service the caustic pump power load. The discovery of
this deficiency in the plans came after the scrubber control panels were
installed and when the contractor was preparing to start preliminary
equipment testing. The solution was the installation of separate power
circuits and controls for the caustic feed pumps. The scrubber panels
can then be dedicated to scrubber controls. This change delayed the
start of testing at the North Scrubber Complex and ongoing work. The
scrubber start-up activities are on the critical path as are the
activities that follow (the modifications of "H" and "I" Scrubbers, the
demolition of "A" and "B" Scrubbers and the installation of Headworks "C"
foul air ductwork). Thus, Item 1 includes a 51-calendar day time
extension for the delay.
-6-
June 14, 1989
Item 2, in the amount of $22,750.00 and 70 calendar days time
extension, compensates the contractor for direct costs including on-site
supervision and office support caused by the contract delay in the start
of the modification work on existing Scrubbers "H" and "I". The contract
documents state that the contractor will not have more than one of
Scrubbers "H" and "I" out of service at a time. Based on the contract
documents, the contractor scheduled the modification work to start prior
to the completion of the North Scrubber Complex concurrent with other
work. However, when the contractor was ready to start the modification
work, he was directed by staff to wait until after the new North Scrubber
Complex was operationally complete. This revised work sequence will
allow the Districts to use a completed and operating new North Scrubber
to minimize odor impacts on the treatment plant neighbors while "H" or
"I" Scrubbers are decomissioned for the planned modifications.
Item 3, in the amount of $13,839.98, provides for improvements to
the steam shunt piping system. The schematics for the steam shunt piping
system and the system description provided in the specifications
Indicated that the steam heated sludge shunt piping was to be terminated
at the highest of the three digester sludge recirculation system
discharge nozzles. Staff felt that the shunt system could be improved by
having the steam heated sludge enter a typical digester at three
locations instead of one. To accomplish this change in process, the
contractor was instructed to terminate the shunt piping at the suction
side of each digester sludge recirculation pump and allow the heated
sludge to pass through the entire recirculation discharge piping system
and the three discharge nozzles. Item 4, in the amount of $6,834.74,
provides for additional asphaltic concrete curb and asphaltic concrete
trench paving requested by the Districts. The contractor placed 658 feet
of 6-inch high asphaltic concrete curb along the north side of the
Bushard entry road and along the road just to the east of the Plant 2
Construction Management trailers to protect newly landscaped areas. The
additional paving was placed over a trench that was excavated and
backfilled by Districts' crews for the installation of a new underground
city water line between the Harris Tunnel and the Plant 2 warehouse. The
Districts elected to have the contractor perform the curb and paving work
concurrent with other contract paving work on this job to save the cost
of a separate paving contractor's equipment move-in.
(2) Change Order No. 14
Change Order No. 14 provides for five items of miscellaneous work
and adds $96,311.08. There is no time extension to the contract
associated with this change order. Item 1, in the amount of $866.21,
provides for the realignment of an existing 12-inch drain that was to be
used for the Odor Control project contractor for connection to the Plant
No. 1 Scrubber Complex. The existing drain was not in the location shown
on the odor control drawings and could not be used as installed. To
accomplish the realignment, an existing concrete encasement and an
existing concrete thrust block had to be removed from the underground
line. Item 2, in the amount of $2,495.00, provides for the construction
of a reinforced concrete pad at the diesel fuel tank fill areas at the
east side of Power Building 4 at Plant No. 1. The concrete pad replaced
asphaltic concrete paving that was deteriorated from fueling activities.
-7-
June 14, 1989
Item 3, in the amount of $60,577.00, provides for changes to the
foul air ductwork at the north end of Headworks "Cu. When the round
overhead fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) foul air duct was designed
and bid for the "Co Headworks, plans for a new conveyor building (under
separate Job No. P2-37) were not yet complete. After the odor control
project was in progress, the conveyor building design was completed. The
round FRP duct design was changed to a balsa core FRP rectangular shape
and the alignment of the duct changed to allow it to pass through the new
Job No. P2-37 Conveyor Building. This item also provides for the removal
of an existing 72-inch FRP exhaust stack in the "C" Headworks and for two
flanged outlets in the new rectangular duct that will be used in the
future for the removal of foul air from the new Conveyor Building.
Item 4, in the amount of $25,855.00, is for installation of 17
methane sensors in the domes over the circular clarifiers at each
treatment plant. The methane sensors (gas detection instruments) were
shown on the electrical drawings but were omitted from the
specifications. Item 5, in the amount of $6,517.87, provides for the
relocation of an existing 10-inch digested sludge line to avoid
interference with the installation of a new 48-inch high density
polyurethane (HDP) "A-line" underground foul air duct.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which would have been included in the original design, if discovered or known in
the design stage. None of the items are for replacement work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 13 adding $98,811.72
and 121 calendar days time extension and Change Order No. 14 adding $96,311.08
to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc.
9(1) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO ENTRANCES, SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1,—JOB NO. P1-27.
In October 1988 the Directors approved a contract with Kiewit Pacific Co.
for the construction of Jab No. P1-27, Entrances, Site, Security and Interior
Road Improvements at Plant No. 1. This $1.6 million project includes a new
front entrance opposite the southbound 405 freeway offlon ramps and a new
Wastehauler Dump Station. Change Order No. 2 consists of eight items of work
for a net addition of $26,462.14. There is no time extension associated with
this change order.
Item 1 is for $667.75 for modifications to the fencing at the east
property line. Six strands of "V"-type barbed wire and angle supports were
installed on top of the new fence in lieu of the specified three strands of
barbed wire on a single angle support. This modification was necessary to be
consistent with the Districts' new security standards. Item 2 is the adjustment
of a manhole to finished grade in the East Perimeter Road for $1,199.41. The
manhole was not shown on the contract plans and conflicted with new paving
grades in the area. Item 3, for $1,080.50, is for the relocation of a telephone
service conduit at the new main entrance. The original telephone service was
not shown to be relocated on the contract plans and conflicted with new area
paving at the entrance.
-8-
June 14, 1989
Item 4, for $9,218.46, is for the replacement of an existing manhole
section at the new main entrance. The manhole section was badly deteriorated
and conflicted with new paving grades. The deteriorated sections were removed
and a new polyurethane-lined section was installed on the manhole base to the
proper grade. Item 5 is for the addition of a thrust block on the waste hauler
drain line for $1,109.02. The wastehauler drain line was originally designed
to be a gravity line. It was decided during the construction stages of the
project to change the design of the wastehauler drain line to a force main to
minimize solids deposition problems. This required all bends in the line to be
supported by concrete thrust blocks. Item 6, for $20,852.00, included the
addition of a restroom, water supply, and sewer discharge piping to the new
guard shack at the new main entrance. It was deemed desirable to have plumbing
and a restroom at this location, which was not included in the original
contract, to accommodate security personnel . Item 7 is the deletion of a motor
control center (MCC) in the Metering and Diversion Structure for a credit of
$4,400.00. An MCC unit is being installed under another project and it was
determined to be better to extend that MCC in lieu of installing the P1-27 MCC
unit. Item 8 deletes certain paving, concrete and piping work from the Waste-
hauler Dump Station for a credit of $3,265.00. In order to satisfy future
wastehauler sampling requirements established by the Districts' Industrial Waste
Division, modifications now under design will be made to the station under a
separate contract and this work will be incorporated into that project.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known
prior to its completion. None of the items are for replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net addition of
$26,462.14 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. There is no time extension
associated with this change order.
9(j) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND
IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIESAT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37.
This project includes 38 non-related items of rehabilitation and repair
work at Plant No. 2. Major items of work include replacement of the domes on
Digesters "A• and "B•, built in the early 1950's; replacement of two influent
pumps at Headworks "C"; the installation of replacement barscreens at Headworks
"C"; replacement of grit augers; screening conveyors; chlorine system piping and
waste activated sludge pumps; new primary influent flow meters; and waste
activated sludge bypass piping. Change Order No. 2 provides for seven minor
changes to the work and adds $33,600.00 to the contract.
Item 1, in the amount of $9,006.00, provides for the rerouting of
existing underground natural gas and city water lines at the new Meter Structure
"A" to avoid a conflict. Item 2, in the amount of $1,243.00, provides for
modifications of construction details on the north wall of a containment
structure to eliminate a maintenance problem and to improve constructability of
the wall . This item also provides for a change in the construction details for
the utility trench bulkhead to allow for the passage of a multitude of process
lines through the bulkhead instead of just the single line shown in the
plans. Item 3, in the amount of $869.00, provides for the installation of a
fresh air fan at the new conveyor building that will be constructed with
fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) in lieu of the galvanized steel unit
specified. Staff determined that the galvanized unit specified would not
-9-
June 14, 1989
withstand the corrosive atmosphere at Headworks "CO. Item 4, in the amount of
$6,732.00, provides for the change of size for plug valves and knife gates that
are to be installed at Digesters "A" and "B". The plans instructed the
contractor to replace existing 6-inch ball valves with new 6-inch plug valves
and provide additional 6-inch knife gates; however, the line is in fact an
8-inch line (where the line enters the digesters it is, in fact, 6 inches in
size). The change is for the higher cost of twenty 8-inch valves in lieu of the
6-inch valves and includes the return shipping costs for the 6-inch valves.
Item 5, a credit in the amount of $7,193.00, deletes proposed catch
basin and drainage work in the area of the maintenance building and surge
towers. Revised plans now call for improvement of the entire catch basin area
under a future contract. Item 6, in the amount of $16,399.00, provides for a
change in the routing of high strength (i.e. , high BOD) sludge piping at
Digesters "C", "D", "F", and "G". The sludge system discharge locations were
not in the location dictated by the system process. The plans indicated that
the points of discharge were to be in the common pump rooms for the two sets of
digesters. The preferred discharge locations were on the exterior of each of
the four digesters where the Districts had installed valved connections prior to
the start of the work. Item 7, in the amount of $6,544.00, provides for
exploratory excavation of the new underground route selected by staff for a new
high strength sludge pipe. The location of existing underground utilities and
process piping along the proposed underground route was uncertain and it was
determined that it would be more cost-effective to excavate the entire trench
route to locate underground interferences.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known
prior to its completion or changes made by staff for long-term operational
flexibility. None of the items are for replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding $33,600.00 to the
contract with Ziebarth and Alper. There is no time extension associated with
this change order.
9(k): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM
NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-19.
During the design phase for the new Central Power Generation Systems, Job
No. J-19, it became apparent that more engine heat will be available than
envisioned in the project report/permitting phase recently completed. The heat,
in effect, becomes an additional energy source and recovery of that energy by
the installation of a steam turbine/generator system is proposed. The system
would generate about one megawatt of power from the waste heat, with no change
in air emissions. The total cost is estimated to be less than $1 million while
annual power savings of approximately $500,000 would be realized.
In May, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit a
proposal and negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the professional services agreement for
the design contract for Central Power Generation Systems. The addendum would
provide for the design of a steam turbine generating system, including a
multi-stage steam turbine, a vacuum condenser, condenser cooling water pumps, V
condenser vacuum pumps and complete instrumentation and controls for the sytem.
Design of the steam production and control equipment is not included in the
current scope of work.
-10-
June 14, 1989
The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee for the additional design
work for an amount not to exceed $68,972.00, including direct labor plus
overhead at 175%, plus subconsultant fees, direct expenses and profit. The
negotiated addendum will increase the total fee for Job No. J-19 from
$3,592,838.00 to an amount not to exceed $3,661,810.00.
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for Addendum No. 4 to the
professional services agreement and adoption of a resolution approving said
addendum with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for Central Power
Generation Systems, Job No. J-19. Copies of the certification and resolution
are attached with the agenda supporting documents.
9(1 ): APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JONES 8
STOKESASSOCIATES, INC. RE PREPARATION 5F ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
WASTEWATER COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN.
In 1988 the Directors approved a professional services agreement with
Jones 8 Stokes Associates, Inc. to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR)
on the Action Plan Wastewater Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan prepared separately by Carollo-Boyle. Although specific tasks were
identified in the original scope, it was difficult to know exactly what the
needs would be until the master plan work was nearly complete.
The scope of the EIR work has, in fact, been expanded in some areas, but
it appears as if the work will be accomplished well within the $213,126 budget.
However, it is necessary to request a reallocation of funds appropriated to
various categories of work.
Therefore, staff is recommending that contract category amounts be
reallocated to transfer $3,000 from the Direct Labor and Overhead category into
the Direct Expenses category to cover the costs of additional word processing,
travel costs to attend bi-weekly Action Plan Management Group meetings not
contemplated at the time the proposal was submitted, an intermediate preliminary
EIR review document including printing and shipping costs, separate EIR
Executive Summary, and costs for express delivery, overnight mail and facsimile
transmissions to meet revised schedules and transmit additional review
documents. There is no change in the total contract amount.
9(m): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 2 FOR PRIMARY
LARIFIER NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NO. P1-33.
In January 1988, the Directors approved a professional services agreement
with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers to prepare plans and specifications for a
60 mgd primary treatment expansion at Plant No. 1. The Job includes new primary
clarifiers and related facilities. The new primary basins will be located on
the westerly side of the plant, immediately south of the shop and warehouse
area, in an area currently occupied by digester cleaning beds. The basins will
be covered with a parking structure similar to Primary Clarifiers No. 1 and 2
which were recently completed. The design also includes relocation of the
existing digester cleaning beds, influent and effluent piping and related
Junction structures and a new foul air scrubber for odor control . In December
1988, the Directors approved Addendum No. 1 which included modifications to the
-11-
June 14, 1989
waste sidestream pump station, relocation of the digester cleaning beds,
replacement of the supply line to the Orange County Water District's (OCWD)
Water Factory 21, and revisions to the polymer dosing system.
As the design has progressed, the need for additional modifications has
became apparent. The original alignment of the two 108-inch primary effluent
lines and location of the effluent junction box had to be modified to
accommodate the easement requirements of Southern California Edison. The
polymer facility is also proposed to be relocated based on operational
experience gained since the original design. Fuentes Road will also be
realigned along the east side of the new primary clarifiers to facilitate
future expansion needs and to provide better truck access to the relocated
polymer building. Redesign of the equipment and scum trough hatches on the
primary clarifiers is necessary to provide more convenient access for
operations and maintenance personnel , based on operation experience with
recently completed Basins 1 and 2.
The recommended action is to authorize the Selection Committee to
negotiate Addendum No. 2 for the engineering services for the design of the
above-described additional work. Following the Selection Committee
negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Boards for
consideration.
9(n): GENERAL AUTHORIZATION FOR ATTENDANCE OF PERSONNEL AND DIRECTORS AT
MEETINGSIN 1989-90.
On an annual basis the General Manager is routinely authorized to
designate members of the Board and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences,
etc., which he believes will be of value to the Districts. Such attendance is
in accordance with the existing Districts' travel and expense reimbursement
policies and the approved annual budget. It is recommended that this
authorization be renewed for 1989-90.
9(o): AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR DATA PROCESSING SERVICES
RE DISTRICTS SUPPLEMENTAL USER FEE PROGRAMS.
Districts 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 have adopted long-range financial plans
that include the collection of Supplemental User Fees as a separate line item
on the annual County property tax bill. Districts 2 and 7 will consider
implementing similar programs next year.
In past years the data processing required to determine these fees and
to assess the proper parcels was performed under an agreement with the County
Assessor's Office utilizing their property file data base. Late in 1988 the
Assessor's Office notified us that they would no longer be providing such
services to other agencies, and staff has taken steps to find alternative
providers. Directors approved an agreement with Arthur Young in January 1989
for the redevelopment, functional design and installation of a computerized
supplemental user fee system to take the place of what the County Assessor
formerly did for us. This design work, which is nearing completion, was all
done on the basis of using the County Data Processing Center. Districts' staff
and County General Services Agency staff have reached a tentative agreement to
allow the future real-time processing to continue to be performed at the Data
Center.
-12-
June 14, 1989
The action on the agenda is to authorize the General Manager to execute
an agreement with the County of Orange for data processing services required to
`... implement and to process the annual Supplemental User Fee application programs
with the same priority, using the same procedures and at the same cost afforded
other County Data Processing Center users. The estimated annual processing cost
is $42,000.
9(p): APPROVING EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY PERMIT FOR GROUNDWATER CLEANUP AT JOHN
WAYNE AIRPORT.
In 1986 a policy was adopted that authorizes the staff to issue temporary
permits for the discharge of contaminated groundwater to the Districts' sewers
under special circumstances for a period not to exceed one year. Although the
Districts are not compelled to accept the contaminated groundwater into the
sewerage system, we believe that doing so is in the best interests of the
community and citizens because such measures help to protect the underground
fresh water basin.
A temporary permit to allow the emergency discharge of contaminated
groundwater to the sewer was issued to the County of Orange for the John Wayne
Airport facility on July 11, 1988 to allow the construction of the Michelson
Bridge as part of the general airport expansion project. This was done in
cooperation and agreement with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control
Board.
Discharge to the sewer occurs on a temporary and intermittent basis and
only when the effluent meets the Districts' industrial waste ordinance
limitations and when discharge to the storm drain under the airport's NPDES
permit becomes impossible, such as a breakdown in the activated carbon treatment
system, or when the treatment system is moved from one construction venue to
another.
The County has requested an extension of the temporary permit. Because
staff's authority only allows the issuance of a permit for one year, any
extension requires the Boards' approval . Staff recommends that the Boards
approve a one-year renewal of the temporary permit to Jahn Wayne Airport so that
construction may proceed uninterrupted. The project should be concluded within
the term of the renewed permit.
9(q): AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE OF PURCHASE ORDERS TO VARIOUS SOILS, CONCRETE AND
MATERIALS TESTING COMPANIES TO SUPPORT THE DISTRI NSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.
The Directors are well aware of the large construction program now in
progress. The Districts do not have a materials testing laboratory and have
historically contracted with private firms and the County of Orange to provide
soils, concrete and other materials testing. Staff is recommending that
purchase orders be authorized to several firms, listed below, so that the
Districts are assured of adequate testing support. Necessary services include
testing of soils, concrete and asphalt; specialty testing including offsIte
inspection of pipe, fiberglass and other materials; and the testing of specialty
metal and non-ferrous materials.
-13-
June 14, 1989
Smith-Emery is a full service construction material testing firm. The
services that we normally use include soils testing, concrete testing, and
testing of miscellaneous construction materials. This firm will be the prime
source for testing services for the current jobs and upcoming jobs within
treatment plants during the next two years.
Twining Laboratories of Southern California, Inc. specializes in testing
construction materials and shop and field inspection of specific construction
materials including the offsite manufacture of pipe. Inspection is required on
all types of pipe used in our facilities and, in some cases, testing is required
prior to incorporating the pipe into the particular construction project. These
testing services will be used for inspection of all reinforced concrete pipe to
be used for both collection system and treatment plant projects during the next
two years.
H. V. Lawmaster & Company, Inc. provides general construction materials
Inspection and testing services. This firm will be used for soils and concrete
testing in conjunction with the collection sewer system contracts during the
next two years.
Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. will be used primarily for soils
testing (soils compaction and density of backfill material ) as a secondary
source for testing in the collection system. When several contracts are in
progress, the need often arises for soils testing to be performed simultaneously
at different sites. If the primary testing services cannot provide the man
power when needed, we call upon the secondary testing service.
Soils and Testing Engineers, Inc. will be used as a secondary source for
soils and concrete testing in both treatment plants. This company will be used
when the primary testing services cannot provide the crews when needed.
Smith- Twining H. V. Associated Soils 4
Emery Laboratories Lawmaster Soils Testing Engrs.
Example of Charges
Soil Technician/hr. $37.50 $35.00 $35.00 $42.00 $38.00
Field Technician/hr. 36.00 35.00 35.00 N.A. 38-42
Inspector/hr. 37.50 35.00 35.00 N.A. 38.00
Minimum Charge 4 hrs. 2 hrs. 4 hrs. 4 hrs. 2-4 hrs.
Travel Charge Inc. $ 0.50 $ 0.45 Inc. Inc.
Maximum Increase/Yr. 3% $ I/hr. • 5% No Increase
*Quoted one year contract only.
Staff has evaluated proposals from the several firms and recommends
Issuance of purchase orders to the five firms in the maximum amounts listed
below.
Maximum Two-Year
Total
Smith-Emery Company $200,000.00
Twining Laboratories of Southern California, Inc. Z00,000.00 v
H. V. Lawmaster & Company, Inc. 100,000.00
Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. 50,000.00
Soils and Testing Engineers, Inc. 50,000.00
-14-
June 14, 1989
It 1s expected that staff will issue additional purchase orders within
the two-year period. Most of these will be for specialty testing within staff's
�. purchase order authority ($25,000.00). As additional firms are identified which
can provide competitive professional testing services, authority will be
requested from the Directors. Staff recommends issuance of purchase orders to
the above listed firms in the amounts indicated for a two-year period beginning
June 15, 1989.
DISTRICT 2
9(r): APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NORTH BRANCH OF THE ROLLING
HILLS DRIVE RELIEF SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT N -11- .
In 1988, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with
Sam W. Peterson 6 Associates to design the North Branch of the Rolling Hills
Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-3. This sewer has been
Identified as being deficient to serve the future needs of the rapidly
developing North County area in the City of Brea. The City of Brea also has a
portion of their sewer within State College Boulevard and Craig Regional Park
which is in need of relief. This portion, which is tributary to District 2's
proposed relief sewer, is included in the plans and specifications. A
cooperative agreement with the City of Brea for reimbursement of costs for
construction of the City's portion has already been approved by the Directors.
The consulting design engineer has completed the plans and specifications
and staff recommends approval and authorization for the General Manager to
establish the bid date for Contract No. 2-11-3. A tentative bid date of
July 18, 1989 is scheduled. The Engineer's estimate for the combined project is
$750,000.00.
DISTRICT 3
9(s): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE
(VAULT) REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. - 8R-1.
This project is for the repair of 79 sewer manhole vaults from Treatment
Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach to Rosecrans Avenue at Beach Boulevard in the
City of Fullerton. The vaults have deteriorated over the years from the effects
of sulfides in the sewage. Change Order No. 5 adds $72,500.00 to the contract
for the specified bonus payment for certain manholes completed ahead of
schedule, and for reconstruction of one additional manhole.
Item 1 provides a bonus payment of $28,500.00 for the early completion of
Manhole Nos. 59 and 63 as specified in Section 50-8 of the contract
specifications. Twelve manholes, located in extremely busy intersections, were
eligible for early completion bonuses to provide an incentive for the Contractor
to finish the rehabilitation work as quickly as possible, thereby minimizing the
safety hazard and inconvenience to the motoring public. Manhole No. 59 is in
the intersection of Valley View Street and Lincoln Avenue. Manhole No. 63 is
in the intersection of Valley View Street and Crescent Avenue.
Item 2, in the amount of $44,000.00, is for reconstruction of one
additional manhole in the City of Buena Park. The City has scheduled new paving
on Valley View Street in the very near future. The added manhole was to be
-15-
June 14, 1989
reconstructed under a separate project now being designed. It is instead being
included in Contract No. 3-28R-1 by change order at the request of both the
cities of Buena Park and La Palma, so that it would be completed prior to the
city repaving contract. There is a 20-day time extension associated with this
added work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 adding $72,500.00 and 20
calendar days to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company.
DISTRICTS 5 AND 6
9(t): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF COAST
HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 1, AND A P A E RA
COMPLETE.
This contract is for the replacement of an old, existing 27-inch sewer
force main with 36-inch ductile iron pipe. The work includes construction of
manholes, valve and appurtenances located within the City of Newport Beach and
the State of California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) Pacific Coast
Highway right-of-way. The work is now complete.
(1) Change Order No. 1
Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $163,677.00, consists of seven
items. Item 1, in the amount of $1,707.00, is for repairing an
undisclosed sewer service connection encountered when potholing for other
utilities. Item 2, in the amount of $2,567.00, is for the removal and
replacement of a plastic gas line which was found to be in the trench
area although shown and marked to be out of the trench alignment by the
gas company. Item 3, in the amount of $67,593.00, is for the addition of
three pressure access tees and manholes installed in the new line to
accommodate future maintenance and construction access. Item 4, in the
amount of $8,900.00, is for the removal of contaminated soil which had to
be transported to a designated disposal site. There was no provision for
such work in the contract. Item 5, in the amount of $29,327.00, is for
additional excavation to install a portion of the new line at a lower
elevation than designed due to conflicts with several utilities at lower
elevations than shown on the plans. Item 6, in the amount of $32,583.00,
is for additional asphalt paving and backflll in areas where the
contractor was directed to widen the excavation to remove the old 27-inch
line. The old line was not found to be in the location indicated on the
plans.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be
corrections which would have been included in the original design if
discovered or known prior to its completion. None of the items are for
replaced work.
Item 7, in the amount of $21,000.00, is a bonus payment for 42 days
early completion of the contract. The contract included a $500/day
bonus/penalty provision for early/late completion to help assure that the
job will be completed before the busy summer season.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $163,677.00 `✓
to the contract.
-16-
June 14, 1989
(2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete
Christeve Corporation has fulfilled all contractual obligations
within the specified time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the
resolution attached to the agenda material , authorizing acceptance of the
work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of
the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is
$1,655,111.00.
DISTRICTS 6, 7 AND 14
9(u) : ACSITION OF PERMANENT EASEMENT FROM RANCHO TOMAS, INC. FOR CONTRACT
N QUI14-1-1A, BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPT R.
The master-planned Baker-Gisler Interceptor and Baker Force Mains,
Contracts Nos. 14-1-1 and 14-1-2, include the construction of farce main sewers
and gravity trunk sewers from the Main Street Pump Station located within the
"Clear Zone" of the John Wayne Airport to Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain
Valley. A 90-inch sewer is planned between the Fountain Valley Reclamation
Plant No. 1 and Fairview Road, an 81-inch trunk sewer between Fairview Road and
Bristol Street, and dual 42-inch force mains In Baker Street between Bristol
Street and the pump station. The project will benefit all three Districts (6, 7
and 14) and will provide the lowest cost construction per unit of capacity
possible. Plans and specifications for the first phase of the contract, between
Bristol Street and Fairview Road, were approved in April (Contract No. 14-1-1B).
Several permanent and temporary easements are necessary for the
construction of this line. Appraisals have been prepared or are under
preparation for all of them by The Schooler Company of Tustin. The first parcel
ready for acquisition is located between the Santa Ana River Channel and the
Greenville-Banning Channel northerly of Gisler Avenue. The private strip is
owned by Rancho Tomas, Inc.
Schooler appraised the 307,000 square foot easement at 10% of the
appraised value of the surface, or $1 per square foot. Staff has met with the
owner and the owner has agreed to sell for $37,700.0O, $1.23 per square foot
(12.3% of appraised value of fee). The appraiser, General Counsel and staff
believe that it is in the Districts' best interest to settle this matter for the
owner's $37,700 offer. The recommended action is to authorize staff to issue a
purchase order for the purchase of the permanent easement from Rancho Tomas,
Inc. in an amount of $37,700.00.
DISTRICTS 7 AND 14
9(v) : APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF COSTA MESA FOR JOINT CONSTRUCTION
OF PORTIONS OF THE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, BRISTOL STREET TO FAIRVIEW
ROAD, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-18, AND CITY IMPROVEMENTS TO BAKER STREET.
In June 1988, the Directors authorized staff to negotiate with the City
of Costa Mesa to include the City's reconstruction of Baker Street between
Fairview Road and Bristol Street in Districts' Contract No. 14-1-1B, the
Baker-Gisler Interceptor. The cooperative joint project will reduce costs for
both the Districts and the City and minimize disruption to the public during
— construction activities. The agreement provides for reimbursement of all costs
associated with the city's road improvement project.
-17-
June 14, 1989
The reimbursement agreement has been prepared and approved by General
Counsel and the City of Costa Mesa. The action appearing on the agenda is to �..�
authorize the General Manager to execute the agreement with City of Costa Mesa.
Staff recommends approval .
DISTRICT 7
9(w): AUTHORIZING THE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CAMPUS
RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT N -1 , WITH CHURCH ENGINEERING, INC.
The 1983 and 1989 master plan reports have both recognized the need for a
relief sewer within Campus Drive between the Von Karman Trunk Sewer and the east
side of Jamboree Boulevard. The project is most needed to serve future new
development on the east side of Jamboree Boulevard bath north and south of
Campus Drive, and will drain southwesterly to Van Karman Avenue.
Staff is proposing that this project be designed to maximize drainage of
sewage to the Campus Relief Sewer since the alternative is to drain northerly to
the Michelson Pump Station. Church Engineering, Inc. is doing the site design
for a large residential and commercial development located on the northeast
corner of the intersection of Jamboree Boulevard and Campus Drive. Accordingly,
staff believes it would be advantageous and most cost-effective to have Church
design the relief sewer.
Staff is therefore recommending that the Selection Committee be
authorized to negotiate a professional services agreement with Church
Engineering, Inc. for preparation of the plans and specifications for the Campus
Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-13. Following the Selection Committee's
negotiations, the agreement will be presented to the Board for consideration.
ALL DISTRICTS
11: NOMINATIONS FOR JOINT CHAIRMAN.
As provided in the Joint Boards' Rules of Procedures, nominations for
Joint Chairman are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place
at the July regular meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint
Chairman will be conducted at the July regular meeting.
For new Director' s information, we have included below an excerpt from
the current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the
Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization.
118. Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administration Organization.
"A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative
Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at
the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint
Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each
year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100
words stating their qualifications for the office of Chairman. The
statements shall be mailed to members of the Joint Boards of
Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July
regular meeting.
-18-
June 14, 1989
... "The nominations for Vice Joint Chairman shall be made at the
regular Board meeting in July each year and shall be made
immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman.
"The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of a
majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chairman
becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent
prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairman shall
automatically succeed to the office of the Chairman and shall
continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless
sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the
event the office of Vice Chairman becomes vacant prior to the
expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a
Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next
regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the
balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a
result of action by a majority of the Districts."
12: APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR SLUDGE HANDLING
FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PI-34-2.
In February, the Directors approved plans and specifications for
construction of new sludge storage and truck loading facilities, modification of
sludge transfer equipment, and a 12 kV electrical service center, plant water
pump station, and electrical distribution center No. 6.
The new 12 kV service center will allow connection of a new Southern
California Edison electrical service and will supply power for treatment
plant-wide expansions and increase the overall reliability of the plant
facilities. The existing plant water pump station has exceeded its normal
mechanical life expectancy. This new pump station will replace older equipment,
and the design allows for future plant expansion needs. The existing sludge
storage and truck loading facility does not comply with new seismic standards,
and has reached its limit for accommodating rising sludge production and
providing needed storage capacity. Job No. P1-33 primary treatment expansion
which will increase sludge production and increase storage capacity
requirements. Replacing this facility will provide maximum flexibility for
operation of Plant No. 1. Additional work includes replacing the existing
sludge conveyor belt system with a cake pump transfer pipeline to the new sludge
storage and truck loading facility. Eliminating these conveyor belts will
reduce the amount of fugitive odors which occur when transferring sludge and
reduce the amount of foul air which needs to be scrubbed.
(1) Addendum No. 1
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Sludge Handling
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 deletes the use of an automatic
halon fire suppression system in an area which does not need this high
level of protection. The addendum also clarifies the size and material
for cable trays throughout the new utility tunnels and buildings and adds
requirements to facilitate the electrical connection for power which will
be generated at the new Central Power Generation System (J-19-1) under a
separate contract.
Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1.
-19-
June 14, 1989
(2) Award of Job No. P1-34-2
On May 23, 1989, six bids were received for Sludge Handling
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2. The bids ranged
from a high of $23,691,524.00 to a low of $19,085,600.00, submitted by
Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , of Upland,
California. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the agenda.
Staff recommends award to Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn
Constructors, Inc. for their low bid amount of $19,085,600.00. The
Engineer's estimate for this work was $22,400,000.
13: APPROVING YEAR 5 NPDES OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM.
As a condition of the existing five-year NPDES ocean discharge permit
jointly issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) , the Districts must
conduct an extensive monitoring program designed to characterize the effects of
our discharge on the ocean environment. In 1985 the Districts issued a Request
for Proposals to provide Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for the Districts'
120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. 5-032. After evaluation of seven
respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science Applications
International Corporation (SAIC) to provide these services for the five-year
life of the permit, and negotiated a fee for Year 1 (1985-86) in the amount of
$917,680. Between the initial contract and Year 4 (1988-89) the scope of the
monitoring program has been increased significantly to comply with changing EPA
requirements. The Year 4 SAIC effort is $1,942,265. -
Enclosed with the supporting agenda documents is the report and
recommendation of the Selection Committee along with a detailed analysis of the
SAIC proposal for Year 5 (1989-90) of the ocean monitoring program; and the
proposal for a portion of the program to be assumed by Districts' staff and
other outside contractors in order to realize a cost savings.
14: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMBINED EXECUTIVE/FISCAL POLICY
M I MEE
The Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees met jointly on May 24, 1989.
Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its discussions and
recommendations for consideration by the Boards.
15: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS AFTER JUNE 30, 1989.
The individual District's 1989-90 Budgets will not be adopted until the
July Joint Board Meeting and, therefore, it is necessary to have Board
authorization for the payment of claims from July 1 to the date of adoption of
next year's budgets. It is recommended that this routine action, taken
annually, be approved as set forth on the agenda listing.
16: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION.
From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed
session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending
litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public
-20-
June 14, 1989
disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a
situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda,
this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed
session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards.
DISTRICT 1
26: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 112 INCREASING ANNUAL SEWER USER FEES FOR
19 9-90.
At the June 1, 1989 Adjourned Meeting of District No. 1, the Directors
reviewed the District' s long-range financial program. Based on the forecasts
which project significant funding shortfalls due to escalating costs of
wastewater treatment and disposal to comply with increasingly stringent
environmental standards required by federal , state and local regulatory
authorities, the Board of Directors has instituted proceedings to revise
previously adopted ordinances for user fees. The Board approved an increase in
supplemental user fees for 1989-90 and introduced Ordinance No. 112 to adjust
the annual supplemental user fees as follows:
Type of User Proposed Annual Fee
Single-Family Residential $45.00/Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family Residential $27.00/Dwelling Unit
Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $32.00/1000 s.f. of Bldg.
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the annual
sewer use fee report, hold the second reading of Ordinance No. 112 and final
adoption of said ordinance, effective with the 1989-90 Fiscal Year, and adoption
of the necessary resolution authorizing and directing the County
Auditor-Controller to collect the use fee on the annual property tax bill .
DISTRICT 5
29: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 519 INCREASING ANNUAL SEWER USER FEES FOR
1989-90.
At the May 31, 1989 Adjourned Meeting of District No. 5, the Directors
reviewed the District's long-range financial program. Based on the forecasts
which project significant funding shortfalls due to escalating costs of
wastewater treatment and disposal to comply with increasingly stringent
environmental standards required by federal , state and local regulatory
authorities, the Board of Directors has instituted proceedings to revise
previously adopted Ordinances for user fees. The Board approved an increase in
supplemental user fees for 1989-90 and introduced Ordinance No. 519 to adjust
the annual supplemental user fees as follows:
Type of User Proposed Annual Fee
Single-Family Residential $45.00/Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family Residential $27.00/Dwelling Unit
Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $32.00/1000 s.f. of Bldg.
-21-
June 14, 1989
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the annual
sewer use fee report, hold the second reading of Ordinance No. 519 and final v
adoption of said ordinance, effective with the 1989-90 Fiscal Year, and adoption
of the necessary resolution authorizing and directing the County
Auditor-Controller to collect the use fee on the annual property tax bill .
DISTRICT 6
32: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 613 INCREASING ANNUAL SEWER USER FEES FOR
1989-90.
At the May 31, 1989 Adjourned Meeting of District No. 6, the Directors
reviewed the District's long-range financial program. Based on the forecasts
which project significant funding shortfalls due to escalating costs of
wastewater treatment and disposal to comply with increasingly stringent
environmental standards required by federal , state and local regulatory
authorities, the Board of Directors has instituted proceedings to revise
previously adopted ordinances for user fees. The Board approved an increase in
supplemental user fees for 1989-90 and introduced Ordinance No. 613 to adjust
the annual supplemental user fees as follows:
Type of User Proposed Annual Fee
Single-Family Residential $49.00/Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family Residential $29.00/Dwelling Unit
Conercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $35.00/1000 s.f. of Bldg.
• The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the annual
sewer use fee report, hold the second reading of Ordinance No. 613 and final
adoption of said ordinance, effective with the 1989-90 Fiscal Year, and adoption
of the necessary resolution authorizing and directing the County
Auditor-Controller to collect the use fee on the annual property tax bill .
DISTRICT 11
35: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1109 INCREASING ANNUAL SEWER USER FEES FOR
1989-90.
At the June 7, 1989 Adjourned Meeting of District No. 11, the Directors
reviewed the District's long-range financial program. Based on the forecasts
which project significant funding shortfalls due to escalating costs of
wastewater treatment and disposal to comply with increasingly stringent
environmental standards required by federal , state and local regulatory
authorities, the Board of Directors has instituted proceedings to revise
previously adopted ordinances for user fees. The Board approved an increase in
supplemental user fees for 1989-90 and introduced Ordinance No. 1109 to adjust
the annual supplemental user fees as follows:
Type of User Proposed Annual Fee
Single-Family Residential $40.00/Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family Residential $24.00/Dwelling Unit
Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $29.0011000 s.f. of Bldg.
-22-
June 14, 1989
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the annual
�. sewer use fee report, hold the second reading of Ordinance No. 1109 and final
adoption of said ordinance, effective with the 1989-90 Fiscal Year, and adoption
of the necessary resolution authorizing and directing the County
Auditor-Controller to collect the use fee on the annual property tax bill .
DISTRICT 3
39: APPEAL OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT NO. 3-1-143 LIMITATIONS BY
BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON.
One of the conventional pollutants for which the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board
(CRWQCB) establish limits in our NPDES ocean discharge permit is biochemical
oxygen demand (BOO). Accordingly, in carrying out both the Federal Pretreatment
Regulations and the provisions of the Districts' industrial waste ordinance,
staff has established a maximum 10,000 pound per day average limit for large BOD
dischargers to our sewerage system.
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson (B/H-W) , located in Fullerton, has appealed the
10,000 pound limit imposed on their tomato processing plant discharge. They are
the third industrial discharger that has been subject to the limitation, but the
first to appeal it to the Board. District 3 Directors have fixed this meeting
for hearing of the appeal .
Transmitted under separate cover to the District No. 3 active Board
members is a package containing the formal appeal by B/H-W and the District' s
response.
-23-
P.E: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13
F� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
�9 P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
IOBN ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 02708-7018
(714)962-2011
June 8, 1989
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Re: Report and Recommendation for Year 5 NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program
(1989-90) and Certification of Negotiated Fee for Amendment No. 6 to
Agreement With SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for
Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification S-032.
BACKGROUND
As a condition of the existing five-year NPDES ocean discharge permit jointly
issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) , the Districts must conduct an
extensive monitoring program designed to characterize the effects of our
discharge on the ocean environment. In 1985, the Districts issued a Request
for Proposals to provide ocean monitoring contract services for the Districts'
120-inch ocean outfall, Specification No. S-032. After evaluation of seven
respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science Applications
International Corporation (SAIC) to provide these services for the five-year
life of the permit and negotiated a fee for Year 1 in the amount of $917,680.
At the time of the original contract award it was noted for the Boards'
information that the requirements of this unprecedented monitoring program had
been established by the EPA and that it was the first of its kind. Although
the EPA had yet to fully define all of the work to be accomplished, the NPDES
Permit required that the work commence immediately. Because of this, it was
anticipated that as the program proceeded and the requirements were refined,
it would be necessary to modify the contract to provide for the changes that
would be required by EPA. Accordingly, the contract was increased to $940,486
with the addition of Amendment No. 1 for relatively minor changes in the scope
of work. Amendment No. 2 was executed upon initiation of the EPA-required
ocean current study which amended the total cost for Year 1 to $1,002,705.
In Years 2, 3 and 4, the total was increased by addendas 3 through 5 to
$1,530,486, $1,707,294 and $1,942,265, respectively. The changes for Years 2-4
included significant increases in the scope of work required to be performed
to better document the environmental conditions in the vicinity of the
Districts' ocean outfall. The proposed Year 5 program is unique because it
reflects a shift of some of the tasks from SAIC to the Districts and two
additional independent outside contractors to strengthen the program while
realizing a cost savings.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
IAA ELLIS AVENUE
a0 9ozeln
FOUN IMN VALLEY.GUMANIA 92728.9127
01.19624.11
Boards of Directors
June 8, 1989
Page Two
PROPOSED YEAR 5 OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM
SAIC continues to provide competent ocean monitoring services to the
Districts. However, staff has found that there are cost-saving opportunities
by shifting some of the tasks from SAIC to staff and other contractors. It is
therefore recommended that the SAIC contract be amended (Amendment No. 6 to
Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-
Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification S-032) to remove the tasks for water quality
sampling and analysis, benthic bio-accumulation, computer data submission and
the October 30 Annual Data Submission Report, and to extend the SAIC contract
as amended to include the Year 5 period for a total lump sun of $1,609,570.
Staff further recommends that the Districts, with independent outside
contractors' support, assume responsibility for monthly and quarterly water
quality sampling and analysis, semi-annual benthic bioaccumulation sampling,
quarterly data submittal and the October 30 Annual Data Submission Report
under a staff-administered Portion of the Year 5 NPDES Ocean Monitoring
Program, Specification No. S-032-1, for an estimated cost of $189,120; and
that said staff-administered portion incorporate work by the Southern
California Water Research Project (SCCWRP) to conduct a current metering and
analysis program (Specification No. S-032-1A) as described in their proposal
dated April 19, 1989 for a total lump sum price of $90,300, and work by
EcoAnalysis to provide data management and evaluation services (Specification
No. S-032-18) according to their proposal dated May 24, 1989 on a time and
materials basis for a not-to-exceed price of $40,000. This portion of the
work would be implemented pursuant to Districts' staffing, equipment and
project budgetary authorizations and procurement regulations.
The overall Year 5 program is summarized as follows:
SAIC Year 5 Contract (Amendment No. 6). . . . . $1,609,570
SCCWRP Current Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,300
EcoAnalysis Data Management Services . . . . . . 40,000
Staff Activities (Estimated) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189.120
51.928.990
This staff recommendation has several distinct advantages. First, the
technical strength of the program will be enhanced with the addition of two
outside contractors who have specialized expertise in ocean currents and data
management. Second, staff scientist oversight and review will be improved by
assuming some of the field work and by having a computerized data set readily
available for evaluation and interpretation. Third, with a wider group of
involved scientists, the environmental sensitivity of the review process will
be enhanced. And fourth, although the overall monitoring effort has been
increased, the staff recommendation represents a $13.275 cost reduction from
Year 4 and a $216,553 cost reduction from SAIC's initial Year 5 proposal.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
9I ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1184A ELLIS AVENUE
Po e0x91v
EWNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8121
`i Boards of Directors 01e962-2.11
June 8, 1989
Page Three
AMENDMENT 90, 6 TO SAIC OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT
The Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Amendment No. 6
to the Agreement with Science Application International Corporation (SAIC) for
Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall,
Specification No. S-032, in an amount not to exceed $1,609,570:
Amount
Offshore Water Quality $ 0
Benthic Monitoring 737,267
Trawls 179,100
Rigfish 54,236
Data Summary 6 Interpretation 410,567
Additional Services 89,909
Contingencies 12,264
Profit 126,227
Total Amendment No. 6 1.6, 09.570
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result
in excessive profits for the contractor.
RECOMMENDATION
Attached is a detailed report of the analysis of the combined SAIC and staff-
administered program to conduct the required Year 5 NPDES Ocean Monitoring
Program (1989-90) . The proposed program has been reviewed with EPA. The
Selection Committee recommends approval of Amendment No. 6 to the SAIC
agreement and authorization to expand the program to add two additional
independent scientific contractors and increase staff scientist participation
and overview as described above and in the attached staff report.
\s\ Don E. Smith \s\ Ron Hoesterev
Don E. Smith Ron Hoesterey
Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
\s\ Don R. Griffin \s\ Blake P. Anderson
`i Don R. Griffin Blake P. Anderson
Past Joint Chairman Director of Technical Services
RESOLUTION NO. 89-54
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO AGREEMENT WITH SAIC
FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR C DO
1 - N H OCEA UTFALL,-SPECIFICATION NO. S-032
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO AGREEMENT WITH SCIENCE
APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (SAIC) FOR
OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 120-INCH
OCEAN OUTFALL, SPECIFICATION NO. S-032, EXTENDING
CONTRACT FROM JULY 1, 1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring
Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of.Orange County 120-Inch
Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 provided for the acquisition of additional
laboratory instrumentation and authorized additional laboratory work to perform
analyses on ocean sediments for trace constituents to comply with additional
requirements imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 provided for modifications to the Current
Monitoring Program required by EPA; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 extended the contract from July 1, 1986, to
June 30, 1987; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 extended the contract from July 1, 1987 to
June 30, 1988; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 extended the contract from July 1, 1988 to
June 30, 1989 and provided for program modifications for the contract period
from July 1, 1987 through June 30, 1988 as well as the fourth year of said
contract, July 1, 1988 through June 30, 1989; and provided for a reduction in
fees to be negotiated for years one, two and three of said contract; and,
\� WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement to
extend the existing contract from July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the established procedures for selection of
professional engineering and architectural services, the Selection Committee has
negotiated and certified a fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,- 13 and- 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Amendment No. 6 dated July 1, 1989, to that certain
agreement dated August 7, 1985, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1,
acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14. for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. 5-032,
providing for extension of the existing contract from July 1, 1989 through
June 30, 1990 (Contract Period Five) , is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by
$1,609,570.00 for the fifth year of said contract, increasing the total
authorized compensation from $6,229,523.00 to $7,839,093.00; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Amendment No. 6 in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALWORNIA
10814 ewe AVENUE
P0.BON 8127
June 6 1989 14MWAIN VAL Y.CALIFORNIA B M-8127
0141 BB2.2N1
STAFF REPORT
Amendment No. 6 to Contract With SAIL
Ocean Monitoring Services
Specification No. S-032
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
In August, 1985, the Districts entered a one year agreement with
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to perform
the marine monitoring activities required by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) as part of the Districts'
301(h) ocean discharge permit. The agreement has been modified
and extended by Board actions through Year 2, Year 3, and Year 4
ending June 30, 1989.
For Year 5 SAIC submitted their original proposal (hereafter
referred to as Year 5(1) )on March 14, 1989 for the continuation
of their role as the major contractor through the fifth and final
year of the Districts' existing ocean discharge 301(h) monitoring
program. Following meetings with Districts' staff, SAIC
submitted a revised proposal on April 7, 1989, (Year 5 (2) ) and a
third proposal (Year 5 (3) ) on April 27. The SAIC Year 5(3)
proposal is unique from previous years because it reflects cost
reductions brought about by the Districts' staff proposal to
shift some of the ongoing tasks from SAIC to the Districts ' staff
and other technnical support contractors.
In Table 1, the initial Year 1 proposal costs from the four
qualified vendors that responded to the original RFP in June,
1985 are compared to SAIC costs for Years 1 through 4 and the
proposed 5(3) version of Year 5. The scope of the program has
increased significantly during the last four years, particularly
when the changes in the program are taken into consideration, yet
the costs are still comparable to those of the other vendors
initial proposals.
A comparison of the negotiated Year 5 costs with Years 1 through
4 are presented in Table 2. Figure 1 graphically shows the major
categorical costs from Year 1 of the marine monitoring program
through the three proposals of Year 5, and the combined SAIC Year
5(3) and Districts effort. Also presented in Figure 1 are the
increased costs for the Districts responsibilities for various
portions of the Year 5 program.
1
Table 3 combines the SAIC Year 5(3) proposal costs and the
Districts' costs to obtain the total costs of the proposed Year 5
ocean monitoring program. The Year 5 combined program is
estimated to cost $1,928,990 compared to $1,942,265 for Year 4, a
savings of $13,275. However, additional work is required in
Year 5 and SAIC's proposal 5(2) totaled $2,145,523 for this
change in scope of the monitoring program. The staff is
proposing to assume a portion of the work and contract a portion
to other firms cutting the SAIC Proposal 5(2) by a net of
$216,553, thus reducing the overall Year 5 cost to the $1,928,990
amount.
EVALUATION
one of the major Year 5 cost increases from Year 4 is caused by
charges for a method of organic contaminant analysis for tissues
and sediments. The method, termed "isotope dilution", follows
the EPA recommended guidelines for organic analysis.
Isotope dilution was actually initiated during Year 4, but much
of the cost was absorbed by SAIC. Districts' staff had
originally decided to approach isotope dilution during Year 4
with a scaled-down demonstration project. However, because some
portions of the results from Years 1, 2 and 3 were under review,
staff decided that moving directly to the superior isotope
dilution method during Year 4 was necessary to verify the
veracity of Years 1, 2 and .3. SAIC did not charge the Districts
for the added costs of isotope dilution during Year 4, and offset
approximately $110,000 of it from their profit.
An evaluation and comparison of program costs from Year 4 to
Year 5 follows:
SAIC First Proposal - 5f11
SAIC submitted their first proposal for Year 5 on March 14, 1989.
Table 4 shows the major monitoring task increases and decreases
from Year 4.
The more expensive isotope dilution organic analysis technique
being used year 5 is the major contributing factor for the
increases over Year 4 in the benthic program ($56,568) , trawl
program ($37,910) and the rigfish program ($13,733) . These three
proposed program increases totaled $108,211.
Other proposed increases from Year 4 are data interpretation and
evaluation ($125,322) and additional services ($38,931) , Table 4.
These increases came at the Districts' request for a more
thorough and in-depth evaluation of the data.
The proposed $175,930 increase in the profit is artificially
inflated due to the Year 4 SAIC-sponsored method validation
study. These costs were applied against profit and absorbed by
SAIC, thus reducing the SAIC Year 4 profit.
2
The proposed Year 5(1) increase in total cost over Year 4 is
$379, 358 (Table 4) .
SAIC Second Proposal - 5(2)
After meeting with Districts' staff, SAIC submitted their second
proposal (5(2) ) on April 11, 1989. Further cost reductions from
proposal 5(1) were seen in the water quality program ($303, 668)
due primarily to a reduction in the scope of the ocean currents
subtask. This resulted in a $116,755 net decrease from Year 4.
A $53,803 reduction from SAIC Proposal 5(1) occurred in the
benthic program primarily as a result of the Districts assuming
the responsibility of the benthic bioaccumulation subtask. The
Districts' personnel and contract vessel Enchanter IV would be
utilized. This resulted in only a $2,765 net increase over the
Year 4 effort.
Other reductions from Proposal 5(1) were seen in the ($ 4,368)
trawl and rigfish ($373) programs, permit reapplication
assistance ($7,072) , quarterly staff meetings ($1,466) held with
the Districts, EPA and CRWQCB, and SAIC's profit ($16, 536) .
The overall reduction from the Year 5(1) proposal was $176, 100,
thus decreasing the total to $2,145,523. This is still an
increase of $203,258 over Year 4 (Table 4) .
SAIC third Proposal - 5 M
After further consultation with the Districts, SAIC submitted
their Third Proposal (5(3) ) on April 27, 1989. The major
difference in the Year 5(3) proposal is that the Districts would
assume the responsibility of the water quality program (sampling
and analyses) and the computer data submittal tasks of the ocean
monitoring permit.
The water quality task is reduced from $441, 949 in Proposal 5(2)
to $-0- in Proposal 5(3) . Some of the SAIC field program
management, direct costs and boat expenses that will still be
incurred but had been accounted for in the water quality program
are shifted to the benthic, trawl and rigfish programs. The
proposed 5(3) benthic program increased $26, 303, trawl program
increased $1,812 and the rigfish program increased $900 over the
Year 5(2) proposal.
SAIC Proposal 5(3) reflects a $69,765 reduction from Proposal
5(2) in the data summary and interpretation task because of the
Districts assuming the responsibility of the quarterly data
submittal to EPA and the October 30 annual data submittal to the
CRWQCB. Some of the SAIC data management costs will still be
incurred and are included in the data management subtask in
Proposal 5(3) . Other reductions from Proposal 5 (2) occurred in
the equipment and weather contingencies ($8, 186) and profit
($45,068) .
3
The total for Proposal 5(3) is $1, 609,570 which is a $712, 053
reduction from Proposal 5(1) , and a $332,695 reduction from
�.../ Year 4.
DISCUSSION
The Year 5(3) proposal reduction of $332,695 from Year 4 is due
partly to the Districts assuming the responsibilities for four
tasks of the ocean monitoring program using staff and
miscellaneous contractors. These four tasks are water quality,
benthic animal tissue bioaccumulation sampling, quarterly
computer data submission to EPA, and the October 30 Annual Data
Submission Report. The following paragraphs discuss the
advantages and costs of the Districts assuming these tasks.
The water quality task consists of sampling for a variety of
water quality parameters at nine monthly stations and 11
quarterly stations and characterizing the currents around the
outfall. The Districts' cost for the water quality task is
$187,770. Its major components are: a) a one year $90, 300
current meter program contracted to the Southern California
Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) , b) sampling costs which
total $21,600 (Table 5) , c) laboratory analytical costs (Table 5)
which total $48, 600, d) the one time purchase of a current
profiler for $17,270, and e) the one time purchase of a $10, 000
infrared spectrophotometer for oil and grease analyses.
The benthic animal tissue bioaccumulation task consists of
attempting to gather enough tissue of the small animals living in
the ocean sediments 12 stations to analyze for 128 pollutants.
The Districts will perform this task for an estimated $14 , 400
compared to the SAIL proposal 5(1) of $59,723 . The Districts'
staff and contract vessel Enchanter IV will conduct sampling
using EPA's criteria of a "reasonable amount of effort" in an
attempt to obtain enough tissue to analyze for priority pollutant
bioaccumulation. The SAIL proposal 5 (1) has analysis costs built
into this task which historically has not been used because
sufficient animal tissue has only been infrequently obtained. If
enough tissue is obtained at any of the stations, then analyses
will be performed using either the Districts' Laboratory or under
the existing outside service laboratory.
The third task consists of submitting computer data on a
quarterly basis on magnetic tapes to EPA. The Districts will
assume this task for approximately $115,000 which is a $27, 151
increase over SAIC's proposed $87,849. This includes a $40, 000
data management and analysis contract with EcoAnalysis.
The final task being assumed by the Districts is the October 30
Annual Data Submission Report. This is a summary of all of the
data collected during the year and is submitted on magnetic tape
to EPA. The projected cost of this report is reduced from the
SAIC proposed $6, 639 to the Districts cost of $2, 250, a savings
of $4,389.
4
The advantages of assuming these four tasks are the Districts
will have direct involvement and control by staff scientists and
technicians to ensure the quality of the data that is generated;
and will incur cost savings. The main advantage of assuming the
computer data submission task is that the Districts will have
full control over the data and can ensure its quality and
useability. Also, Districts' staff will input the data into our
data base management system making it more accessible to staff
scientists for analysis and interpretation.
Summary
In summary, staff recommends accepting the SAIC Year 5(3)
proposal for $1, 609,570. The $332,695 reduction from Year 4 (and
$712,053 reduction from SAIC's Year 5(1) proposal) is primarily
due to a reduction in scope of SAIC's responsibilities which will
be assumed by the Districts and other outside contractors.
The overall ocean monitoring program is not being reduced and, in
fact, is being increased. The Districts, under this proposal,
will assume the responsibility of the water quality sampling and
analyses, the benthic bioaccumulation sampling, the computer data
submission and the October 30 Annual Data Submission Report.
SAIC retains the responsibility for the sampling and analyses of
the benthic monitoring, trawls, rigfish, the remainder of the
data summary and interpretation and the task identified as
additional services.
The costs for assuming the abovementioned responsibilities using
Districts staff and miscellaneous contractors are estimated at
$319,420 (See Table 5) . The estimated total of the Districts'
costs and SAIC's proposal 5(3) is $1,928,990. This is a savings
of $216,533 from the SAIC's Year 5(2) proposal. Overall it is a
cost savings of $13,275 from Year 4.
RECOMMENDATION
SAIC continues to provide competent ocean monitoring services to
the Districts. However, staff has found that there are cost
saving opportunities by shifting some of the tasks from SAIC to
staff and other contractors. It is therefore recommended that
the SAIC contract be amended (Amendment No. 6) to remove the
tasks for water quality sampling and analysis, benthic bio-
accumulation, computer data submission and the October 30 Annual
Data Submission Report and to extend the contract as amended to
include the Year 5 period for a total lump sum of $1,609,570.
Staff further recommends the following contracts:
Southern California Water Research Project (SCCWRP)
(Proposal attached) to conduct a current metering and
analysis program as described in their proposal Dated April
�..r 19, 1989 for a total lump sum price of $90, 300.
5
EcoAnalysis (Proposal attached) to provide data management
�....i and evaluation services according to their proposal dated
May 24, 1989 on a time and materials basis for a not to
exceed price of $40,000.
Staff further recommends that the Districts assume responsibility
for monthly and quarterly water quality sampling and analysis,
semi annual benthic bioaccumulation sampling, quarterly data
submittal and the October 30 Annual Data Submission Report for an
estimated cost of $189, 120 to be implemented pursuant to
staffing, equipment and project budget authorizations.
The overall Year 5 program is shown in Table 6 and summarized as
follows:
SAIC Year 5 Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,609,570
SCCWRP Current Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,300
EcoAnalysis Data Management Services . . 40,000
Staff Activities (Estimated) . . . . . . . . . . 189,120
1 .928.990
BPA:MM:au
REF#920117.RP
6
TABLE 1
COST COMPARISON OF SAIC CONTRACT HISTORY AND OTHER QUALIFIED
VENDORS BIDDING ON INITIAL YEAR 1 CONTRACT
Original Year Proposals Year 5
Kimetic Lab/ Brown B Science Applfcatiors Districts
K.P. Lindstrom ECO Caldwell InternatiomI Corporation 8 SAIC
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5(3)
Offshore Water Quality S 282,078 S 672,471 S 466,181 S 136,675 $ 391,225 S 394,252 S 558,7D4 S 187,T70
Benthic 632,001 901,157 706,465 423,013 530,798 582,342 708,199 751,667
Trawls 85,352 92,121 121,778 79,328 105,922 115,576 143,746 179,100
Rfgffsh 54,768 22,142 32,875 20,915 31,614 34,271 39,976 54,236
Date SuamrY interpretfon 413,670 484,402 385,804 162,634 247,075 274,578 342,650 487,817
Additional Services 45,824 21,414 23,846 30,079 39,394 48,723 60,660 89,909
Total Cost $1,513,697 $2,193,707 $1,736,949 $1,002,705 51,530,486 $1,707,294 $1,942,265 S1,928,990
MN:au
REF#920M XLI
WATER QUALITY W/O CURRENTS CURRENTS
aoo 3110
000
zao
2110
. .o lso x0 2110a
0 0 L
: L
Go
me
a 0
1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(2) 5(3) 5- 1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(2) 5(3) 5-
BENTHIC TRAWL
900 — 200
175
750 i
150
600 1 125
x 0 1w
x 0 450 0
0
300 0 73
150 � 2.5
0 i i F,
1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(2) 5(3) 5' 1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(2) 5(3)
RIGFISH DATA INTERPRETATION
as
so 4110
40 376
3w
0
x 00 150
a 30 X0
a
20
I: L L s 7
F
1 2 3 4 3(1) 3(2) 5(3) 1 2 3 4 5(1
) 5(2) 5(3) 5-
Districts estimated costs to take over
Li SAIC Charges portions of program in year 5.
Figure 1. HISTORY OF OCEAN MONITORING CHARGES
(p.,. 1 of 21
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
too
90
b..i 90 sa
ro
1 so $z;
0
2 0 SO a
0 40 fr.
2
10 rt'e
0
1 2 0 4 5(11 3(2) 5(2)
PROFIT
200
175
ISO
1 125
X 0 f00
0 1/
SO '
2/
O
1 2 2 4 S(1) 5(2) S121
TOTAL COST
2400
2100
lam
1 1100
X 0 1200
0 /00
000
000
O
1 2 2 4 5(1) 6(2) 3(2) 5-
Districts estlmated costs to take over
-. SAIC Charges It portions of program In year S.
Figure 1. HISTORY OF OCEAN MONITORING CHARGES
("go 2 of 21
TABLE 2
Sununarizatfon of SAIC Charges
Years 1 - 5
TMK/SOBTASKS Year 1 Yosr 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 MlVear 5 MlYear 5 (3)
A. OFFSHORE WATER MIALITY MONITORINO Cost S
Monthly Chemical & Physical Sampling 66 943 123 662 126.55 141,035 148.01 148,016 0
Monthly Bacterial Sampling 12 120 8 518 9 834 43 087 30 228 23,220 0
Quarterly Chemical & Physical Sampling 28 323 SL 417 55 964 71 908 66 338 66.09 0
Ocean Current Monitoring 32 204.628 201.904 291.416 301.039 204,616 0
Celiferm Sar;aiinq Charges 0 0 O 11,258 0 0 0
Total 136,675 391,225 394.25 558 704 545.61 441,949 0
B. BENTHIC MONITORING
QuartarLy Sampling 26 807 51.1 57.0 60,501 63.10 63,106 81,528
Quarterly Benthic Infaune Identification 78.401 115,7281 122.833 130,485 136.18 136,184 137.148
Qwrterty Chenicel & Ph feel Analysis 184.499 247."Il 265.513 359.3541 379.6571 375,578 380 244
Semiannual aiosccunuletion 41,951 25.7091 38,399 43.2291 59.7231 0 0
Annul Sampling 9,791 9 3i0 10.2 10 941 10.0621 10.662 12,315
Annual Benthie IMaune Identification 12,476 17 320 18.24 19,375 20.809 20.809 20,809
Annuat Chested and Physical Analysis -AS 6L 153 70 894 84 314 105 223 105,223 105.2
Total 402,297 530 798 582.34 708 199 7" 767 710,964 737,26
C. TRAWLS
Semiannual Trawl Survey 16 653 21 672 23 582 25 324 29 694 29,698 31,011
Annual Metapathotogy Studies 10 245 13 825=M 17 933 26 333 26,333 26,6
Annual Priority Pollutant Saeptl na 52.430 70,425 76.55 100,489 125,629 121.25 121.481
Total 79,328 105,9 175 576 143.74 181,656 177.288 179,100
D. RIG FISHING
Fish ComnMtfon Survey 1,071 1.177 1.245 1.344 1.5791 1.579 1,579
Semiannual Fish Survey 6,843_12 566 13.079 13.799 13.7111 13,734 14,632
Semiannual Priority Pollutant S tin 9.5 14,142 19,050 19,059 29.948 29.533 29.533
Areal Kistopethology Studies 3 415 3 729 4 897 5 774 8.451 8,490 8.4
Total 20 915 31 674 36 271 39 976 53,70 53.33 54.23
E. DATA BWMMARY AND INTERPRETATION
MmrterLy ODES Rewrt 4 49B 62,4 77,1 80,003 87,863 87.849 0
October 30 Annual Report 13.228 12,578 13,320 4,202 7,022 6,639 0
January 30 Annual Report 47,089 74 968 80 003 133,122 174,980 198,312 198,312
Data Storage, Management 97.81 97,102 104,066 106,153 113 779 131,730 156,453
Additional Annual Re rt Requirements 0 01 0 19.2001 84 358 55,802 55,802
Total 162.634 247,0751 276 578 342.6501 468.002 480,332 410.5
F. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Liaison with Distrlet/Mena anent 21,106 28 763 37,172 39,690 56,485 56.48 56.48
Quarterly Review Meeting with Districts 7.111 10.241 11.153 12.158 20.066 18,600 18,600
Camera Andy Copy of Reports 1,862 410 399 0 0 0 0
QC Dosunent Review 0 0 0 3,658 5,963 4,817 4.81
Permit Reapplication Assistance 0 0 0 5 154 7 072 0 0
Contract Conptetfon Activities 0 0 0 0 10,005 10,005 10,005
Total 30,0 39 394 48,723 60 660 99,591 89.9 89 909
Equipment Contingencies 0 10 300 10 300 10 225 10 225 10,225 6 132
Weather Contingencies 0 10,30 10,300 10,225 10,225 10,225 6,132
Additional Studio & Costa Not Included 82,953 35.3 110,676 55,949 0 0 0
Profit 87 824 128 549 126 276 it 901 187,831 171,295 126.227
Total with Ammandnents L Options-I 002 705 1 530 486 1 707 2914 1 942 265 2 321 623 2 149,523 1,609,570
7au/REFs920095.ML2
TABLE 3
Combined SAIC Proposal 5(3) and
Districts Costs For The
Preferred Ocean Monitoring Program
TASK/SOBTASKS Year 5 (3) Eat. Distriees Coat SAIC/Distriet Coat
A. OFFSHORE WATER DIMLITY MONITORING
Namthty Chemical 8 Physical Semplim 0 69,400 69,400
Monthly Bacterial SmaNAing 0 10 800 10,800
Quarterly Chemical 8 Physical Samptirs 0 0 0
Ocean Currant Mmiter1rag 0 107,570 107 570
Coliform Sampling Charge, 0 0 0
Total 0 187,770 187,770
B. BEMTMIC NOIITORING
Quarterly Sampling 81.5 0 81.52
Quarterly Benthic Infaune Identification 137.148 0 137.1481
Quarterly Chemical 8 Physical ArmLysla 380 2K 0 380 2K
Semi Amwl 0iamem,m nation 0 14.400 14,400
Auraal Sampling 12,315 0 12,315
Areual Banthic Infaune Identification 20.809 0 20 809
Ammml Chemical aM Physical Aral is 105 223 0 105,223
Total 737,267 14,400 751 667
C. TRAWLS
Semienmml Trawl Su 31,011 0 31,011
Amaal HistopathoLogy Studies 26 60B a 26,605
Arsuml Priority Pollutant Smtim 121.481 0 121,461
Total 179,100 0 179.100
0. RIG FISHING
Fish Cwmurfiptim Survey 1 579 0 1.5
Semi Aural Fish Sury 14 632 0 14,632
Semi Ameal Priority Pollutant Sarpting 29 533 0 29,533
Amaml HistopathoLogy Studies 8 M 0 9,492
Total 54 736 O 54,236
E. DATA SmmART AMP INTERPRETATION
Quarterly ODES Report 0 115 000 75,000
October 30 Ammal Report 0 2.25 2.250
Jaruery 30 Aral Report 1911 312 0 198 312
Data Storage, Management 156 453 0 156,453
Adfiti oral Amael Report Requireenta 55.802 0 55 802
Total 410,567 117,250 527 817
F. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Liaison with District/Maragemorit 56 0 56,487
Quarterly Review Neetirg with Districts 18,600 0 IB 600
Camera Ready Copy of Reports 0 0 0
OC Donment Review 4,81 0 4,817
Permit Reapplication Assistarce 0 0 0
Contract Comptetice Activities 10 005 0 10,005
Total 89 909 0 89,909
Equipment Conti mein 6,1 0 6,13
Weather Conti fes 6 132 0 6,132
Additimml Studies 8 Costs Not Included 0 0 0
Profit 126,227 0 126 227
Total with Anmendmnts d tiara 1,609,570
319,G20 1 928 990
IDI/w/REF0920095.%L3
Sarre/
TABLE 4
Comparison of SAIL Year 4 Coats and
Proposed Year 50), 5(2), end 5(3) Coate
Tasks Year 4 Year 5
50) 5(2) 5(3)
Mcwt M t over Amount Amount Over Aaoutt Aaant Over
Yr 4/(Under) Yr 4/(Under) Tr 4/(Under)
Water Quality $558,704 $545,617 (E13,087) 441,949 ( 116,755) 0 (E558,704)
Senthic 708,199 764,767 56,568 710,964 2,765 737,267 29,068
Trawls 143,746 181,656 37,910 177,285 33,542 179,100 35,354
Ri9fishine 39,976 53,709 13,733 53,336 13,360 54,236 14,260
Data Sumary/ 342,680 468,002 125,322 480,332 137,652 410,567 67,887
Znterprotatior
Additional Survey 60,660 99,591 38,931 89,909 29,249 89,909 29,249
Contin0mciec 20,450 20,450 0 20,450 0 12,264 ( 3,156)
Additimat Studies 55,949 0 ( 55,949) 0 ( 55,949) 0 ( 55,949)
Profit 11,901 187,831 175,930 171,295 159,394 126,227 114,326
Total $1,942,265 S2,321,623 8379,358 $2,145,523 $203.258 $1,609,570 ($332,695)
Ms.
REFB920130.XL1
TABLE 5
Cost* Misc. Outside Equipment
Amluol Mrs. (230/hr.) Contractors Costa Total
Water Quality
Sampling 720 S 21,600 S 21,600
(SCCWRP)
Ocean Currants E 90,300 90,300
Seabird
Current ProfiLer 17,270 17,270
SubtotaL E 129,170
Lab Costs
Fecal 360 10,800 10,800
TSS 504 15,100 15,100
Ammonia 504 15,100 15,100
Graeae 6 OIL 252 7,600 7,600
Subtotal S 48,600
IR Spectrophotometer 10,000 10,000
Total S 187,770
Benthic
Bloeceunulation 480 14,400 14,400
Subtotal S 14,400
Odes Data Submission 2,500 73,000 75,000
Data Management (EcoAnalysis)
Support 40,000 40,000
Subtotal S 115,000
Oct. 30, Annual 75 2,250 2,250
Subtotal 2,250
Total 5 395- S161,850 S 130,300 $ 27,270 $ 319,420
Districts$ Task Sub-Total 319,420
SAIL Contract Total $1,609,570
Ocean Monitoring Program $1,928,990
*Based on hourLy labor rate plus 71 percent cost
allxation as per BILL ALdrich memorandun July 1, 1988.
-Breakout of Annual Hours:
Data Handling SampLing Analysis Total
Compliance Division 2,075 690 1,620 2,755
Laboratory Division Soo 520 1,620 2,640
5,395
Mau
REFB920095.kL4
TABLE 6
YEAR 5 OCEAN MONITORING
MISC.
SAIC Districts Contractors Total
Offshore Water Quality 0 97,470 90,300 187,770
Benthic Monitoring 737,267 14,400 0 751, 667
Trawls 179,100 0 0 179, 100
Rigfish 54,236 0 0 54,236
Data Summary & Interpretation 410,567 77,250 40,000 527,817
Additional Services 89,909 0 0 89,909
Contingencies 12,264 0 0 12,264
Profit 126,227 0 0 126,227
Total $1,609,570 189, 120 130, 300 $1,928,990
MM:au
REF$920130.XLS -
A PROPOSAL ON
SPECIAL STUDIES FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS
FROM
Dr. Terry Hendricks
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
646 West Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California 90806
April 19, 1989
Task 1. Measurement of Currents in the Vicinity of the Wastewater Outfall
Objective:
The transport of wastewater constituents away from the outfall is governed by the movement of
the ambient ocean currents and (in the vicinity of the diffuser) the currents induced by the initial
dilution process.
Measurements of the ambient currents at a single location are conveniently obtained using a
moored current meter. These measurements are useful for estimating the range of initial dilutions
achieved by the diffuser, the availability of the required ambient water for dilution, the dispersion
of wastewater constituents—including the sedimentation and resuspension of effluent and natural
particulates.
Background:
Current measurements have been carried out in the vicinity of the Orange County outfall by
SCCWRP and more recently and extensively,by Science Applications International (SAI). The
SCCWRP measurements focused on the outer portion of the shelf and slope (water depths from
50-350m) and in San Gabriel Canyon. Meter depths generally ranged from 40m to 350m(canyon
measurements to 550m). These measurements were concentrated on the portion of the water
column below the pycnocline and near the bottom. In addition to describing the basic properties
of the currents, these studies examined correlations between changes in the flows on the slope and
over the shelf.
The SAI measurements cover the shelf area(including the head of Newport Canyon), in water
depths ranging from 35m to 80m). Meter depths ranged from 13m to 74m. As in the SCCWRP
studies, the SAI measurements essentially characterize the properties of the currents below the
pycnocline. Measurements were made at depths on the order of 13-14m to characterize the
motion of the surface waters. However,subsequent analysis of temperature data indicated that
this location was often within a region of large temperature gradients. Since significant shear
generally occurs across this region (an approximation to a"thermocline"), during some periods
these shallow records are probably a mix of surface layer and deeper currents due to vertical
motions of the thermocline resulting from internal tides and longer-period baroclinic processes.
Method:
A single sub-surface, taut-line, mooring will be placed in 52-55m of water at the location shown in
Figure 1. This location was selected to measure the ambient currents away from the influence of
the outfall (i.e.the flows induced by the initial dilution process),yet provide estimates of the initial
speed and direction of motion of the wastefleld away from the outfall.
The mooring will contain three current meters. The meters will be positioned at depths of
(approximately) llm,35m, and 53m below the surface to provide records of the motion of the
surface layer, the mid-water (typical wastefleld depth), and near-bottom waters. A depth of 1Im
for the upper meter was selected as a compromise between the desire to ensure that the meter is
2
redominantly within the surface layer, and concerns about the safety and security of the mooring
(pand the requirement of a surface float) if the upper float is shallower than lOm.
The lower meter will be at an elevation of 2m above the bottom Several years of sediment trap
studies of sediment resuspension carried out by SCCWRP in this area indicate that the bulk of
resuspended sediments are transported within the lower few meters (e.g.3m) of the water column
This near-bottom meter will provide data required to estimate the transport of resuspended
material and,in combination with wave data (discussed subsequently), can be used to estimate the
stress on the ocean bottom and the likelihood of sediment resuspension.
The mid-water current meter, at a depth of 36m,will measure currents at a depth comparable with
the probable location of the wastefield in the water column when the water column is stratified.
This information is useful for estimating the transport of wastewater and the distribution of
sedimenting effluent particulates. In combination with the near-bottom measurements, and the
temperamre measurements at both depths, the mid-water currents will also provide a data base
for estimating the initial dilutions achieved with the outfall.
Although the near-surface meter will be positioned closer to the surface than in the SAI
measurements, there is still the potential for contamination of the records by shear across the
thermocline (but less so than at the 12-14m depths). The primary value of ese current
measurements will be during periods when stratification of the water column is a minimum,
resulting in an increased probability of the formation of a surface wastefield. During these periods
of weak stratification, shear can be expected to be reduced and the near-surface measurements
will improve the capability to estimate wastewater transport.
Each current meter will also record the ambient temperature. SCCWRP current meters will be
used at the mid-water and near-bottom depths to maximize the sensitivity and accuracy for weak
flows. An InterOcean S-4 current meter will be used at the near-surface depth to min+mi
distortion of the record by surface gravity waves. This meter will also contain a pressure sensor.
In combination with the near-surface current measurements, this pressure information can be
used to generate a time-series of the surface gravity wave field. This wave data, in combination
with the near-bottom current measurements,would be useful in estimating the magnitude of
increased stress on the bottom, and their frequency of occurrence.
Scope of Work:
Time-series of current velocity, temperature, and water pressure (wave field) will be collected by
the upper meter. Time-series of current speed and direction, and temperature,will be collected at
the mid-water and near-bottom depths. Sampling intervals will be 15 to 45 minutes, and the
measurements will be carried out for twelve consecutive months. The mooring will be serviced at
one or two month intervals, at which time the data will be retrieved and processed.
Summaries of the analysis of each data set will include:
1. Probabilities of current speed and direction for each meter;
2. Characterization of the variations in time (spectral analysis) for the
currents, temperature, and differences in temperature;
3. The monthly net speed and direction of flow, the principal axes of variation,
and the corresponding variance (decomposed into two frequency bands—
sub-tidal and tidal/super-tidal);
4. The average temperatures;
�.. 5. Progressive vector diagrams; and
6. Probability matrix of wave amplitude vs. period.
3
In addition, time-series of currents (spd/dir), temperature, and waves (amp/per) will be
transmitted to Orange County on floppy diskette.
A final report will be submitted. In addition to summaries of the monthly data (described above),
this report will include an analysis of longer-term (e.g.seasonal) changes in the properties of the
currents, temperature, and wave climate.
Work Schedule:
It is anticipated that if this proposal is accepted, the field work will commence in July, 1989. We
expect that notification of funding will allow us time to obtain and test the InterOcean S-4 meter
before it is needed in July. Diskettes containing the monthly time-series will be submitted within 3
weeks of the servicing of the moorings, and the final report will be submitted within 3 months of
the final recovery of the meters.
Budget:
SSaff Hours Solt
T.Hendricks 240
H. Stubbs 200
D. Diehl 200
J. Nelson led.) 40
$39,000
Inter Ocean S-4
current meter 23,000
Supplies 3,400
Total $65,400
4
Task 2_ Identification of Ocean Current Flow Patterns in the Area Around the
Orange County Ocean Outfall
Objective:
Empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis will be applied to the current meter data collected
by Science A plication, Inc. in the vicinityty of the Orange County Sanitation Districts ocean outfall
off Newport untington Beach from 1986 to 1988. This analysts technique identifies reoccurring
flow patterns that exist among the current meter moorings and their respective contributions to
the overall observed (measured) flows.
A streamfunction calculation(equivalent to assuming quasi-geostrophic flow)will be used to
extend these flow patterns away from the immediate vicinity of the current meter moorings to a
larger area. Time-series of the variations in the dominant flow atterns will be constructed from
the original observations, and used to estimate the frequency of occurrenceof these "elemental"
flow patterns and"composite"flow patterns (simultaneous contributions from two, or more,
elemental patterns to the flow).
Usefulness:
This analysis identifies dominant, reoccurring flow patterns that exist in the vicinity of the ocean
outfall. The number of patterns, and their corresponding spatial variations, can be used to
determine the number of current meter moorings that are required to describe the circulation
within the area, and the appropriate locations for these moorings.
In addition, analysis of the frequency of occurrence of these elemental patterns (and their
strength) can be used to describe the speed and direction of transport of wastewater away from
the outfall, and the probability of occurrence of representative composite (i.e. combinations of the
elemental flow patterns) circulations. These results describe the transport of wastewater over
time-scales of several days, and thus for assessing the potential for impact of the discharge on
various sensitive or protected areas.
It is also anticipated that these elemental flow patterns, either in their statistical form (described
above) or in combination with their temporal variations, may provide a useful and improved
method of estimating the transport and initial sedimentation of effluent particulates.
Background:
It is frequently convenient to decompose currents into components on the basis of the spatial and
temporal characteristics. An example of spatial decomposition is the transformation into
"alongshore"and "cross-shore" components. Temporal variations are frequently decomposed into
"tidal , "sub-tidal" (i.e. slowly varying), and"super-tidal" (rapidly varying) frequencies. The relative
contributions of each of these frequency bands to the overall flow generally changes with
direction. For example, tidal and super-tidal frequency fluctuations usually dominate the cross-
shore motions,while sub-tidal (and to a lesser degree, tidal) frequencies dominate the longshore
motions.
5
The distances (length-scales) that water is transported by currents associated with each frequency
band depend on both the frequency (i.e. the duration of the flow in one direction) and the strength
of the flow. In general, the sub-tidal frequencies (e.g. periodicities > 1 day) dominate the
transport over distances in excess of 1-2 kilometers, tidal fluctuations give rise to transport over
distances on the order of 1-2 kilometers, and the super-tidal variations result in small scale
dispersion of the wastefield. It follows that the sub-tidal frequency motions determine the
direction and rapidity of transport of wastewater constituents away from the outfall—except in the
immediate vicinity(1-2 kilometers) of the diffuser.
Examination of the data collected from a single current meter often shows that there is a
preferred axis for the sub-tidal motions. Along sections of the coast with relatively "straight"
bathymetery this axis generally corresponds closely to the orientation of the isobaths. The
direction of this axis is identified from the current meter records by finding the direction
corresponding to the maximum variance. EOF analysis extends this type of flow direction
identification to situations with more than one current meter(i.e. multiple spatial locations--either
vertically, or horizontally).
In areas with more variable bathymetery, the circulation patterns can be expected to be more
complex than a simple alongshore flow. Examples of such areas include Santa Monica Bay, and
the bight lying south of San Diego Bay and Point Loma. We developed an analysis method, using
EOF and streamfunction calculations, to assess the potential impacts of a discharge from a
proposed outfall in the southern portion of the San Diego bight on the nearshore bathing water
and kelp beds along this section of the coast This technique proved to be a convenient,
quantitative, and easily comprehensible method of analysis for these assessments. The technique
and results are described in Appendix A (attached)—more complete details are available in the
study report to Engineering Science (Hendricks and Christensen, 1987).
One result of this study was the identification of two dominant flow patterns. Based on this result,
and the corresponding spatial patterns, it was possible to carry out a second year of current
measurements with only two appropriately located current meter moorings (instead of the original
six) without a significant loss of information on the flow in the area
The bathymetry in the region around the Orange County outfall is also relatively complex.
Downcoast from Newport Canyon, the shelf is relatively narrow (1-3 km). Upcoast, however, the
shelf expands offshore in two steps (separated by San Gabriel Canyon) to a width on the order of
20 km, then contracts back toward the coast in the vicinity of San Pedro Canyon (and the Palos
Verdes headland). In shallower water(e.g. on the order of 30m), however, the bathymetry of the
region between the Palos Verdes headland and Newport Canyon is better described as relatively
straight, or even a mild bight.
This bathymetry may give rise to a more complicated circulation than is observed along relatively
straight sections of the coast, leading to increased cross-shelf transport. For example, a large eddy
was one of the dominant flow patterns identified in the San Diego bight,with potentially
important effects on the siting of the proposed outfall from the standpoint of cross-shelf transport
and the potential for effluent recirculation.
Scope of Work:
We propose to utilize the existing current meter data collected by SAI under contract to the
Orange County Sanitation Districts for the period from mid-1986 to mid-1988.
6
Elements of the analysis include:
1. Inventory of the available data(locations, depths, durations of usable
data, etc);
2. Conversion of the data from NODC format(approx. ?? million bytes) to
SCCWRP format(estimated to be about?? million bytes);
3. Basic analysis (e.g.temporal characteristics,principal axes, etc);
4. Decomposition of-the the data into two frequency bands ( 1-tidal and super-tidal
and,2-sub-tidal.);
5. Generation of the cross-correlation matrix for the sub-tidal components.
6. Use EOF analysis to obtain the flow patterns (modes) and their relative
importance;
7. Calculate the time-series for each flow pattern;
8. Compute the,joint modal probabilities for the dominant modes;
9. Use a streamfunction calculation to compute and illustrate the regional
flow patterns for the dominant modes;
10. Compute and illustrate representative composite flow patterns;
11. Compute the small-scale dispersion associated with the tidal (and higher
frequency) fluctuations;and
12. Describe the results in a report
Work Schedule:
It is anticipated that work can commence on this project immediately after the project is approved.
The final report will be submitted 6 months after commencement of the work
Budget:
Staff Hours cost
T.Hendricks 300
J. Nelson 40
522,100
Supplies 800
Total S2Z900
7
w,o,w nmtaor
0 R. n1lw:an nen oen o�+
ili, y II a 21 / ey { \+ noann9 4m4 c 9ww. me
W iaenonuow w 0eea
$J e:N ai15:.. a,nmw wm ru rnen
\ 9 `
IRb 101, / \ T >pff atit
.
Y /
a54
/ \�i .... Nu' NcxoN■ I 'Al
54
$
114
,
T s IR14
\ e
14 �i s• s
\ I le IwQi e, ^i.x•„ R �;gy ,Lt61
21 21
17
\ is
1. 14 1 p II yr a
ri ti \ u 2
\ Is u 13
is
27
21 ,g e
H � Is 12
1� 42 $ II i\ 22 \ I , 21 21
62 p$y
RA\ Ra
29
y n p/ M6�� ""2e 71
at \ I Imo•• ` �.wl \ F�i.M N'O/
i, wr
K ee 11I \\\\''JJ5$ySST.�.1..r �
\ 20
93 47 1f 1 07
C '14e \\ tl r1 92 sty\ a0i\ a]
. C=7q \\\ Or lxf( ,\�T IM �� -.� \�IB
$ s In la \ 14
170
05
�tJ A i IN 1e4 120 /1"' 145/ I I lac
2R \ 2R4 .3 /\\9\
21
% / 216 / \ 20T/ ` / 1194 174 •"
B9 •SW I \ \2XI m 2R9 \ 22� \ 21 248
6AN PEQRO N\ 7IL �\
5
240 242 tRT iN0158 R 18746 zz9, �xz
b1AACH I , T,9 0./. \1� I x.
i N J i O
1y . \ �� teo / 264
0
+ °
co
..
... ..................
_._._...__._...____..._................. .....................................
w
' . A
..
_.... C7
=- z
..
0
0
00
T
N
6
C nI
r luVl
N I
6
00 -tl£ 3QRLLLHIOv ££
_ Eco na sis
EcoAnalysis, Inc.
Arcade Plaza • Sulte A
221 E. Motlllja Street
Ojai, CA 93023
(805) 646-1461
Proposed Plan for Database Support for the
Orange County Sanitation District
Ocean Monitoring Program
Prepared by EcoAnalysis, Inc.
May 24, 1989
OBJECTIVE
EcoAnalysis proposes to provide data management, programming, and
analytical support services for Orange County Sanitation
District's ocean monitoring program for a cost not to exceed
$40, 000. These services include incorporating new data into the
current database system, technical support, and preparation of
ODES reports. Services will be provided as they are needed and
billed on a time and materials basis.
STATEMENT OF WORK
EcoAnalysis' work will include the following:
o Incorporation of new data into the present database system.
Data are expected to include effluent data from the
laboratory, water quality data from the profiling system, and
data from outside contractors. These will be checked, refor-
matted, and entered into the database in a manner consistent
with the historar-ai data alr=ady present.
o Technical and analytical support. EcoAnalysis programmers and
analysts will be available for use by Orange County personnel
for any programming or analytical applications on an as
needed basis.
o ODES preparation. The database will be expanded to include
quality control and other cross-reference information and
integrated with custom written programs with the goal of
producing ODES reports inhouse.
BUDGET
Services to be provided will not exceed a total cost of $40, 000.
EcoAnalysis- labor categories and rate structure are listed in
the table below.
Labor Category Rate (per hour)
------------------------------------------
Management $ 75.00
Senior Analyst 75.00
senior Programmer 75.00
Analyst 65.00
Programmer 65.00
junior Programmer 50.00
Technical Writing 50.00
Data Entry 25.G0
Administrative Support 25.00
VAX computer time 10.00 / hour
Travel mileage .24 / mile
Expenses cost + 15%
v
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
21 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
May 24, 1989 13844 ELLIS AVENUE
y va.2O%e127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 2272bB127
(71AIN2.2411
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE/FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES
Meeting Date: May 24, 1 _ p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Present: Present:
Don E. Smith Joint Chairman Ron Hoesterey, Chairman
Ron Hoesterey Vice Joint Chairman Bill Mahoney
Robert Hanson Chairman, District 1 James Neal
Buck Catlin Chairman, District 2 Wayne Silzel
Richard Polis Chairman, District 3 Peer A. Swan
John Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5
Richard B. Edgar Chairman, District 7 Absent:
Tom Mays Chairman, District 11
Peer Swan Chairman, District 14 Don R. Griffin
Don Roth County Supervisor James A. Wahner
Roger Stanton County Supervisor
Absent: STAFF PRESENT:
Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
James Wahner, Chairman, District 6 Blake Anderson, Director of Technical Svcs.
Hank Wedaa, Chairman, District 13 Bill Clarke, General Superintendent
Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering
Ed Hodges, Senior Facilities Manager
OTHERS PRESENT: Gary G. Streed, Chief Admin. Assistant
and Acting Director of Finance
Director Charles Sylvia Ray Young, Safety Coordinator
John Dunlap, SCAQMD
Gracie Tucker, SCAQMD
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
1) Presentation on Employee Commuter Program Required by SCAQMD
TFegu9a On
The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has adopted a rule
that requires carpooling. It is one of many measures adopted by SCAQMD for
reducing vehicular air emissions. The rule requires certain employers
(including the Sanitation Districts) to establish an employee commuter program
beginning July 1, 1989.
At last month's meeting, the Committee reviewed the Districts' proposed
program to comply with Regulation XV and considerable discussion ensued
concerning the various requirements of Regulation XV and alternatives for
complying and the Committee decided that it would be helpful to the members to
have a formal presentation at this meeting. SCAQMD representatives John Dunlap
-1-
Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees Report
May 24, 1989
and Gracie Tucker attended the meeting and reviewed the Regulation XV
requirements, some existing approved programs, various incentives to achieve
compliance and distributed information. Enclosed (green) is a copy of
Regulation XV.
Members of the Committees asked several questions of the SCAQMD
representatives regarding Regulation XV, certain of its provisions, incentives
for employees to participate in various program elements and enforcement of the
Regulation. Several Directors indicated a preference for a plan that does not
require payment of cash incentives by the employer.
2) Status Repa rt and Approval of Actions Regarding Pending SCAQMD Permit
to onstruct for 0 MGD Primary Treatment Expansion at Reclamation
Plant No. 1.
At the Committee's April meeting the members discussed at considerable
length the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) evolving
requirements for obtaining a Permit to Construct (PTC) the next master-planned
Increment of primary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1.
In order to provide the required data for the SCAQMD permit processing,
considerable outside technical assistance and specialized consulting services
are needed. To ensure that the required technical data is developed in a timely
manner to keep this important project on schedule and avoid any further permit
processing delays, the Joint Boards on May loth, authorized the Executive
Committee to approve for execution by the General Manager, agreements for
specialized professional consulting services; testing and analytical services;
procurement of materials, equipment and services for installation and operation
of facilities for pilot scale testing; and acquisition of air emission credits
pursuant to SCAQMD new source review regulations. These measures are necessary
to comply with SCAQMD requirements for the proposed 60 mgd primary treatment
expansion of Reclamation Plant No. 1. The permit to construct must be received
from SCAQMD before the Districts can bid the job for construction.
Staff reported that it has been able to engage the necessary technical
assistance required to date within its procurement authority ($25,000) , and
reviewed the enclosed (buff) separate status report and recommended actions.
Following a general discussion the Committee took the following actions:
• Re Preparation of Health Risk Assessment.
1. Ratified the staff action of issuing a purchase order to Dorado
Enterprises in an amount not to exceed $5,000, for fabrication of
enclosures over certain plant facilities to enable gathering of air
samples.
-2-
Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees Report
May 24, 1989
2. Ratified the staff action of issuing a purchase order to VOC, Inc. , in
an amount not to exceed $15,000, for gathering samples in accordance
with SCAQMD protocol , delivery of the samples to a laboratory for
analysis and preparation of a final analytical report.
3. Ratified the staff action of issuing a purchase order to Del Mar
Analytical in an amount not to exceed $10,000, for laboratory
analytical analysis of air samples.
• Re Purchase of Offsite Emission Credits.
1. Ratified the staff action of issuing a purchase order to Carleton
Engineers in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for assistance in
locating, evaluating and permitting offsite emission credits and
related assistance for Job No. P1-33.
2. Approved a purchase agreement with Kimstock Inc., of Santa Ana in an
amount not to exceed $673,750 for 550 pounds per day of VOC credits,
and authorized the General Manager to execute said agreement in a form
meeting General Counsel 's approval.
• Re Issuance of Public Notice.
Ratified staff action in issuing a purchase order to Towne Advertisers
Mailing Service in an amount not to exceed $7,000 for preparation of the
mailer, including postage, for the required SCAQMD public notice.
3) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations re 1989-90 Joint Works Budgets.
Fiscal Policy Chairman Hoesterey reported that the Committee had met
several times over the past few months to consider the 1989-90 Joint Works
Budgets. He reviewed the enclosed booklet containing the following budgetary
recommendations:
(a) Personnel Recommendations (blue): Forty-one new positions are
recommended to provide staffing required by major treatment plant
expansion, new program implementation to comply with changing
regulatory requirements, to operate and maintain the facilities and to
support related activities. Many of these positions will not be
filled until later in the year, and some may not be filled at all if
completion of construction projects is delayed. The recommended
positions are in support of a variety of programs as summarized in the
following:
-3-
Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees Report
May 24, 1989
Program/System Position
Administrative Support (Accounting,
Purchasing, Warehousing, MIS/EDP) 6
Risk Management/Safety Engineering 1
Odor Control and Air Scrubbing Systems 2
Sewage Collection Systems 2
General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 4
Regulatory Compliance 4
Source Control Program 5
Process Monitoring 8 Laboratory 2
Facilities Planning 8 Design 5
Construction Management 10
41
The recommended new positions will raise the authorized staffing level
from 497 to 538 at a maximum annual salary of $1,489,260. Because
additions will be staged based on actual need and completion of new
facilities the estimated cost for 1989-90 is $1,191,689. Employee
benefits add approximately 27% to the salary costs.
(b) Joint Operating Fund (green): The net cost of administering the Joint
Districts ac iv�t es and and maintaining the Joint
Treatment Works for 1989-90 is estimated at $46.2 million. Revenues
and other offsets in the amount of $1.7 million will reduce the net
Joint Operations requirements to $44.5 million, up 14.5% from the
1988-89 budget. Of this, 5.7% (approximately 40%) of the increase is
due to inflation and plant expansion and 8.8% (approximately 60%) is
the result of regulatory mandates.
A little over one-third (35%) of the budget increase is due to
additional staffing requirements as summarized above. Sludge disposal
and utilities each account for approximately 20% of the increase and
the remaining 25% is spread between chemicals, repair and maintenance
materials and other supplies.
1%./
-4-
Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees Report
May 24, 1989
(c) Self-Funded Insurances: Included in the Joint Operating Budget, the
following self-funded budgets are consistent with the Boards' past
Board actions relative to these plans:
1. Workers' Compensation (pink)
2. Self-Funded Health Plan (goldenrod)
3. Liability (salmon)
(d) CORF Joint Works Construction (yellow]: The CORF budget sets forth a
$10 . million rea ent pan cons�ction program for 1989-90 in
accordance with the 30-year Action Plan Master Plan now under
consideration by the Boards.
Recommendations:
The Committees recommend approval of the proposed 1989-90 personnel
requirements and Joint Works Operating and Construction Budgets.
4) A21; Min Fiscal PolicyCommittee to Place Districts' 1988-89 Workers'
Ompensa ion xcess insurance Coverage.
Staff reported that the Districts' Workers' Compensation Excess Coverage
insurance policy expires on July 1, 1989. The Districts' present policy for
statutory workers' compensation coverage (unlimited benefits) with an annual
self-insured retention level of $250,000 carries an annual premium of
$30,040.00.
Because of the way the insurance marketplace works, the Districts' broker
has advised that he may not have quotations for the 1989-90 coverage in time for
consideration by the Boards at the regular June meeting. Inasmuch as the
current coverage will expire between the Boards' June 14th and July 12th regular
meetings, staff recommended that the Fiscal Policy Committee be authorized and
directed to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and
place appropriate excess workers' compensation coverage effective July 1, 1989;
and that the actions taken by the Fiscal Policy Committee be submitted to the
Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 12th.
This is similar to procedures followed by the Boards in past years.
The Committees concur with staff's recommendation to authorize the Fiscal
Policy Committee to place the Workers' Compensation excess coverage insurance
effective July 1, 1989.
5) Amending Boards' Rules of Procedure re Executive Committee Membership.
Joint Chairman Smith reported that the Boards' current Rules of Procedure
�..i provide that the immediate Past Joint Chairman serve as a member of the
Executive Committee. He observed that the insight and knowledge that Joint
Chairmen gain in their almost daily involvement in the Districts' activities
-5-
L
Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees Report
May 24, 1989
during their term of office has proved to be a valuable resource to the
Executive Committee in its deliberations of the many important issues that the
Boards face. He also noted that the sitting Joint Chairmen have found the
advice and assistance of their predecessors to be most helpful as well . Joint
Chairman Smith recommended that the Boards' Rules of Procedures be amended to
provide that each Past Joint Chairman that remains on the Board of Directors be a
member of the Executive Committee.
The Committees recommend that the enclosed (salmon) resolution amending the
Boards' Rules of Procedure to provide for all Past Joint Chairmen to be members
of the Executive Committee be approved.
6) Review of General Counsel 's Compensation.
The Committees discussed the enclosed (gold) proposal from the Districts'
General Counsel for an increase in compensation proposed to take effect
July 1, 1989. The last review and adjustment was in November 1987.
Mr. Woodruff has been very active in both AMSA and CASA. He currently
chairs the CASA Attorneys Committee and is past chairman of AMSA's committee.
Mr. Woodruff represents the Districts in a superior manner in legal matters,
both inside and outside the agency, has a very good relationship with Districts'
staff members, and continues to exhibit enthusiasm and energy in his
representation of our interests. The Committees believe that he provides
excellent legal services to the Districts.
The Committees recommend approval of an amendment to the Agreement for
Employment of General Counsel , incorporating increases to compensation in
accordance with Mr. Woodruff's proposal , effective July 1, 1989.
7) Closed Session re Personnel Matters.
The Joint Chairman convened the Committees into closed session for a
discussion of personnel matters. Enclosed is a separate confidential report and
recommendation from the Committees.
If any Director wishes to further discuss the report or recommendation, the
Joint Chairman will adjourn to closed session at the Board meeting.
-6-
REGULATION XV
TRIP REDUCTION/INDIRECT SOURCR
RULE 1501 GENERAL
RULE 1502 DEFINITIONS
RULE 1503 CONTROL OF INDIRECT SOURCES - INCREASE IN
AVERAGE VEHICLE RIDERSHIP BY EMPLOYERS OF
100 OR MORE EMPLOYEES
RULE 1504 PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANS
RULE 1505 EXEMPTION
�f
(Adopted December 11, 1997)
RULE I501. GENERAL
This regulation sets forth the actions employers which employ 100 or more persons at
any worksite must take to promote employee participation in trip reduction and
ridesharing programs. These programs are intended to reduce emissions from vehicles
used for commuting between home and the worksite. It is the intent of the District to
work with affected employers and local jurisdictions in improving trip reduction
activities, to encourage small employers to pin transportation management
organizations, and to evaluate the effectiveness of this regulation two years after it
has been fully implemented to insure that it is as effective as possible.
It is also the intent of the District to substitute the provisions of Regulation XV for
those of Regulation VII. If the Environmental Protection Agency does not approve
deletion of the traffic abatement requirements of Regulation VII, the District will
consolidate the two regulations so that employers will be required to submit only a
single plan.
The implementation of this regulation will begin July 1, 1999. The regulation requires
the Executive Officer to give notice of plan requirements to the affected employers ga
a phased schedule. Affected employers shall submit plans ninety days after receiving
notice. Affected employers must review and update the plans annually following the
same schedule. Any affected employer subject to a city or county trip reduction
ordinance which is at least as effective as this regulation in increasing average vehicle
ridership (AVR) may be exempted from the requirements of this regulation.
`ash
1501 - 1
(Adopted December 11, 1987)
RULE 1502. DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this regulation, the following definitions apply:
(a) Alternative Transportation means the use of non-motor vehicle mod" of
transportation. Walkiag and bicycling are examples.
(b) Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) means the figure derived by dividing the
employee population at a given worksite that reports to work weekdays between
6:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. by the number of vehicles' driven by these employees
commuting from home to the worksite during these hours. AVR may be
calculated using weekly or biweekly averaging periods. The applicable
employee population is multiplied by the n1imber of weekdays in the selected
averaging period, then divided by the 1014, number of vehicles driven by these
employees to the worksite during the some period.
*Vehicles counted shall exclude bicycles, transit vehicles, buses serving multiple
worksites, and cars stopping on route to other worksites. District-approved low
pollution vehicles shall also be excluded.
(c) Central City Area (CCA) means the Los Angeles City area bounded as described
below:
(1) by the Santa Monica Freeway (Route 10) from Union Avenue to
Alameda Street;
(2) Alameda Street from the Santa Monica Freeway to Sunset Boulevard;
(5) Sunset Boulevard from Alameda Street to the Harbor Freeway (Route
110);
(4) the Harbor Freeway from Sunset Boulevard to the Hollywood Freeway
(Route 101);
(5) the Hollywood Freeway to Temple Street;
(6) Temple Street from Belmont Avenue to Union Avenue; and
(7) Union Avenue from Temple Street to the Santa Monica Freeway.
(d) Employee means any person employed by an employer as defined in Rule
1502(e).
(a) Employer means any person, firm, business, educational institution, government
agency, or other entity which employs 100 or more people at a single worksite
as defined in Rule 1502(k).
1502 - I
(Adopted December 11, 1987)
RULE 1503. CONTROL OF INDIRECT SOURCES -
INCREASEIN AVERAGE VEHICLE RIDERSHIP
BY EMPLOYERS OF 100 OR MORE EMPLOYERS
(a) The Executive Officer will begin sending written aotiees of the requirements
Of this regulation to employers, as defined by Rule 1502(e), In accordance with
the following schedule:
July 1, 1988 employers who employ 500 or more persons at a
worksite
January I, 1989 employers who employ 200 or more persons at a
worksite
January 1, 1990 employers who employ 100 or more persona at ■
worksite
Following written notice employers shall submit to the Executive Officer a trip
reduction plan which shall meet the requirements of this regulation. The trip
reduction plan shall be submitted within 90 days of the notice.
(b) Submitted plans must specify the measures the employer will take to achieve
the specified average vehicle ridership (AVR) for employee vehicles subject to
the regulation.
AVR targets are:
1.75 AVR in the Central City Area of Source Receptor Area 1;
1.5 AVR in Source Receptor Areas 1 (excluding the Central City Area),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 32, 33,
34, and 35;
1.3 AVR in Source Receptor Areas 13, 14, IS, 24, 25, 26, 27. 29, 29, 30,
31, 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40.
(See Attachment I for locations of specific source/receptor areas.)
(e) The plans shall be prepared by a trained transportation coordinator and shall
include:
(1) Designation of a trained transportation coordinator responsible for
implementation of the plan.
(2) An inventory of current measures used by the employer intended to
achieve increases in Average Vehicle Ridership.
1503 - 1
\� (Adopted December 11, 1987)
RULE 1504. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANS
(a) The written notice specified in Rule 1503(a) shall be served personally, or by
registered or certified mail- Each employer so served shall submit to the
Executive Officer the plans and information described in the notice within 90
days after the receipt of the notice. In the event that the employer reasonably
needs more time to prepare and submit a plan meeting the requirements of this
regulation, additional time may be sought from the Executive Officer.
Additional time may be granted for good "use, but such extensions shall only
be effective if in writing, with a new submittal date specified. The Executive
Officer shall notify the employer whether or not the extension has been
granted within 15 days of receipt of request for extension.
(b) After the employer submits the plan, the Executive Officer must either approve
or disapprove the plan within 60 days. Notice of approval or disapproval shall
be given by registered or certified mail. If the plan is disapproved, the reasons
for disapproval shall be given in writing to the employer. Any plan
disapproved by the Executive Officer must be revised by the employer and
resubmitted to the Executive Officer within 30 days of the notice of
disapproval, or the employer shall be deemed to be in violation of Rule 1504(f).
It the employer believes that the plan meets the requirements of this regulation
and that the plan was improperly disapproved, the employer may appeal the
disapproval to the District Hearing Board. An appeal of a disapproval must be
made within 10 days after the employer receives the notice of disapproval.
(c) An approved plan may be revised between plan submittal dates by submitting a
plan revision. The revision shall not be effective until approved by the
Executive Officer.
(d) Each employer must review its implementation of the plan, and update and
resubmit the plan annually. The review shall focus on ridesharing and trip.
reduction incentives offered by the employer. The review and update shall
consist of a report that:
(1) estimates AVR levels attained,
(2) verifies that the plan incentives have been offered,
(3) .describes use of those incentives offered by employers,
(4) evaluates why the plan did or did not work, and an explanation of why
the revised plan is likely to achieve the AVR target levels,
(5) lists additional incentives which can reasonably be expected to correct
deficiencies, and
1504 - 1
(Adopted December 11, 1937)
RULE 1505. EXEMPTIONS
(a) Any employer subject to a city or county ordinance which requires the
implementation of trip reduction measures by that employer may be exempted
from the requirements of this regulation. In order to obtain this exemption, the
employer must make written application to the Executive Officer, and the
Executive Officer must determine that the requirements of the ordinance are at
least as effective as this regulation in increasing AVR at the employer's
worksite. The written application must be made within 30 days after initially
receipt and notice from the Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 1503, or within
30 days after receiving notice of an annual review and update.
(b) In order to maintain this exemption, the employer shall submit an annual report
to the Executive Officer describing the trip reduction incentives being offered
and the actual AVR levels achieved at the employer's worksite. The Executive
Officer may make the exemption conditional upon maintaining a specified
AVR level at the worksite, and may revoke the exemption at such time as he
determines that the specified AVR level is not being maintained. In the event
that the city or county ordinance under which the employer qualified for the
exemption is amended or rescinded, the exemption is void and the employer
must reapply for an exemption within 60 days of the date of amendment or
rescission.
1505 - 1
tVlO JRING, FORECASTING AND REPORTING AIR QUALII Y
\39
13 _ 15B �r . -
'�-s _-i l . All l
- ' y 36 _ '
r— �Y
.22
0• :4/may ..,. /� 110 l i `` 1
- g - 19 ' : . 1' 28
SOITR COMM r [ A M •/10 25 (/
IMP WM-1 Y MMAGEMIMT DISTRKT _W LL (J/
SW11Cf RECEPTOR AREAS 1 / 6 • ~
ImIVWWI..m to Wl.bOlm lu..PElf.Orf\/IRJIo..IO Ert YIpd lO n..f.11.1!
rnf oOl.:nll ru.I.Oo ys. phxamo e.fa"W...am lM..O MM.Ia/1Rvtw ...iOp.aultn,eian rtm/n,..w.Iur..t,111IW e.f
.I[Y rw ro.1..l rol.fl.I1W.ml m,PI. , IMu.....tnr.p.m.mI{4.t.m.Oluu IUY..,..I.IIIurt u1WIIDQ 1.�nMb I.o.1.
TM .rt u..mpmlly b. ro,l.pnilauY...m o...m.IM.iriW lw..ws- mw.n.,.ulion.m.,MbwIm Y1111.mIw r..m lmsPw.Iu.ms cloa.Ilro.ilw..t
lapel .m ., p.lh.io. tlrr.tt.ririq ukiy Imo .cowl ty,Ic.l .im MMmr. wllonwtl.[ni,n...loer,.n..r 4md
mowYl bo.eo.,b.mlr.m rMr IMtuml..Iuie W..,
An.veor.miA.r 1n.M,.e w I.,Rn.Dirti..rtpw.i.u.r a,bm y rs.I.m
. wP.I.il.m w by b rms MW Man M.
FwI PWIk -C.rml Lw Al -Am I:' A.O.bl1m1 Valk,-Amm Va"m
rmh-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
May 18, 1989 1® EWSAWE
GO.BOY 812]
.� EgIMNN VY1FY.LLLIEOPNL 92]2BA12]
nlaesz4411
Status Report and Approval of Actions
Regarding Pen Permit to Construct for
60 MGD Primary Treatment Expansion at Reclamation Plant No. 1
At the Committee's April meeting the members discussed at considerable
length the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) evolving
requirements for obtaining Permit to Construct (PTC) the next master-planned
Increment of primary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1.
In order to provide the required data for the SCAQMD permit processing,
considerable outside technical assistance and specialized consulting services
are needed. To ensure that the required technical data is developed in a timely
manner to keep this important project on schedule and avoid any further permit
processing delays, the Committee recommended and the Joint Boards approved on
May loth, an action authorizing the Executive Committee to approve for execution
by the General Manager, agreements for specialized professional consulting
services; testing and analytical services; procurement of materials, equipment
and services for installation and operation of facilities for pilot scale
testing; and acquisition of air emission credits pursuant to new source review
regulations. These are necessary to comply with SCAQMD requirements for the
proposed 60 mgd primary treatment expansion of Reclamation Plant No. 1. The
permit to construct must be received from SCAQMD prior to the start of
construction.
Several recent meetings have been held between representatives of the
SCAQMD and the Sanitation Districts (CSDOC). The meetings have been most
productive and a schedule has been jointly developed between SCAQMD and CSDOC
for resolution of the remaining issues.
Staff has been able to engage the necessary technical assistance required
to date within its procurement authority ($25,000). The staffs actions are
listed for ratification by the Committee along with the authorizations requested
of the Committee so that the Directors can determine the total effort required.
Preparation of Health Risk Assessment. In April the Directors authorized
the hiring of Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $95,000 to
assist in the acquiring the PTC from SCAQMD including the preparation of
the necessary health risk assessment. SCAQMD, CSDOC and Malcolm Pirnie
have had several meetings regarding the computer model and work is underway
utilizing "dummy" toxic volatile organic compounds (VOC) values.
Independently, CSDOC, with assistance from Malcolm Pirnie, has gathered
samples from various plant processes which will be analyzed and when that
analysis is complete, the values will be input to the computer model in
place of the "dummy" numbers allowing completion of the health risk
assessment. Staff schedules call for submitting the complete health risk
assessment to SCAQMD prior to June 1, 1989.
-1-
Recommended Actions:
It has been necessary to engage the services of several firms to assist to
completing the health risk assessment. Accordingly, the following actions
by the Executive Committee are recommended:
1. Ratify staff action of issuing a purchase order to Dorado Enterprises
In an amount not to exceed $5,000, for fabrication of enclosures over
certain plant facilities to enable gathering of air samples.
2. Ratify staff action of issuing a purchase order to VOC, Inc., in an
amount not to exceed $15,000, for gathering samples in accordance with
SCAQMD protocol , delivered the samples to a laboratory for analysis
and preparation of final analytical report.
3. Ratify staff action of issuing a purchase order to Del Mar Analytical
In an amount not to exceed $10,000.00 for laboratory analytical
analysis of air samples.
> Purchase of Offsite Emission Credits. Preliminary screening analyses
indicated that procurement o additional VOC (non-methane hydrocarbons)
emission credits are necessary for this project. As the Directors are
aware, the SCAQMD Board is considering an amendment to the New Source
Review rules that would exempt POTW's from the requirement to acquire
offset emission credits under certain circumstances. However, the change
would not occur for five months at the earliest. Such a delay would be
more costly to the project from construction inflation ($200,000 per month)
than the estimated price of purchasing the credits ($673,750 - see below).
The exact amount of the required credits has not yet been quantified;
however, the credits must be obtained prior to issuance of the required
public notice by SCAQMD.
Staff has engaged Carleton Engineers to assist in locating and evaluating
emission credits. A local company, Kimstock, Inc. of Santa Ana, is
offering emissions credits for sale, and staff and Counsel have negotiated
with Kimstock for the purchase of 100 tons per year (550 pounds per day) of
Kimstock credits have been certified by SCAQMD and can be immediately
transferred to CSDOC upon approval of a purchase agreement. This 1s of
considerable benefit to the Districts.
Recommended Actions:
1. Ratify staff action in issuing a purchase order to Carleton Engineers
in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for assistance in locating,
evaluating and permitting offsite emission credits and related
assistance for Job No. P1-33.
2. Approve a purchase agreement with Kimstock in an amount not to exceed
$673,750 for 550 pounds per day of VOC credits, and authorize the
General Manager to sign said agreement in a form meeting General
Counsel 's approval.
Issuance of Public Notice. The SCAQMD staff are drafting a public notice
concurren w th the preparation of the health risk assessment and
quantification of the VOCS. If staff delivers the health risk assessment
-2-
to SCAQMD by June 1, SCAQMD has indicated they will authorize mail-out of
the required public notice to residents surrounding the Fountain Valley
plant (within a one-quarter mile radius of the plant perimeter) by
mid-June. The actual mailing by the notice will be done by CSDOC.
Recommended Actions:
Ratify staff action in issuing a purchase order to Towne Advertisers
Mailing Service in an amount not to exceed $7,000 for preparation of the
mailer including postage for the required SCAQMD public notice.
° VOC Reduction Demonstration Project.
When SCAQMD issues the PTC, one of the conditions will be a VOC reduction
demonstration project. CSDOC has prepared a proposal for such a project
and submitted an application to SCAQMD for a PTC the demonstration project.
The project will include a small pilot wet scrubber (50 cfm) using various
chemicals to measure VOC reduction. Those chemicals and operational modes
most successful will be modeled in a second, larger scrubber (500 cfm).
The results will be submitted to SCAQMD.
Depending on the outcome of the demonstration project, the District may
have to modify the existing wet scrubber system to reduce VOCs. The cost
of the demonstration project is not yet known, since the amount of testing
has not been determined.
Recommended Actions:
None at this time. Once the SCAQMD requirements are better defined staff
will advise the Committee at a future meeting.
Future Approval of Final Plan and Specifications and Other Related Actions.
The final plans and specifications will be submitted to the full Boards at the
regular meeting on June 14, 1989 for approval and authorization to receive
construction bids, subject to receipt of the PTC from SCAQMD.
Also requested will be authorization for staff and General Counsel to proceed
with condemnation of an easement from Southern California Edison (SCE) necessary
for the outlet pipe southeasterly of the Plant 1 boundary at Garfield Street and
the Santa Ana River. Although staff and counsel believe that easement
negotiations with SCE will be successful , and may preclude the need for use of
eminent domain, approval of an order of immediate possession 1s recommended so
that the project will not be delayed if easement negotiations break down.
Other recommended actions in June will include authorization for the Selection
Committee to negotiate an addendum to the design contract with Lee and Ro
Consulting Engineers to include any necessary last-minute design changes
required to comply with forthcoming SCAQMD requirements that are outside the
scope of the original design contract.
-3-
Schedule for Receipt of PTC and Award of Construction Contract for Job PI-33.
At the close of the public comment period in mid-July staff will finalize plans
and specifications (assuming no major obstacles are uncovered). Plans and
specifications would then go on sale the day the PTC is received. The plan
described above should lead to the issuance of the PTC on or before
August 17, 1989. It is anticipated that bids for this $40 million project will
be received in September, 1989, with award of a contract scheduled for the
regular meeting in October 1989. If the project proceeds on this schedule, it
will be operational prior to the winter of 1992-93.
-4-
RESOLUTION NO. 89-56
AMENDING RULES OF PROCEDURE RESOLUTION NO. 87-51
RE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-51 ESTABLISHING RULES
OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF THE
DISTRICTS RE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 87-51 established rules of procedure to facilitate
the orderly handling of business to come before the Joint Administrative
Organization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
of Orange County, California; and,
WHEREAS, these Boards deem it desirable and appropriate to amend said rules
of procedure relative to membership of the Executive Committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
Section 1. That Section 13.(a) of Resolution No. 87-51, establishing rules
of procedure for the conduct of business of the Districts, be amended to read as
follows:
13. STANDING COMMITTEES:
(a) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - There shall be a permanent Committee
designated as the Executive Committee which shall consist of the
Chairman of the Board of Directors of each District, or other
District Director as designated by the Chairman, the Directors who
represent the Orange County Board of Supervisors, and the Chairman
and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization.
Each past Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall
also serve as a member of the Executive Committee, provided that
said person serves as an active Director of a District Board. Any
person designated as an alternate member of the Executive
Committee must be an elected official of the same District as the
regular Executive Committee member.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall
be the Chairman of the Executive Committee. The Committee may fix
a regular meeting time and place or may meet at the call of the
Chairman.
The Committee may consider any matters related to the joint
ownership, operation and construction of all the Districts and
make recommendations thereon to the Joint Boards of Directors of
the Districts."
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
1989-90 JOINT WORKS
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
P SITATION
— =may �'e to4olitan Ofo OIST'f'
0
U m N
fq = K
S'nce 195t+
OggNGE COVE
_ MAY 24, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
r. W ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
May 24, 1989 1084 Ears AVENUE
_ vo.BOX 8127
i(WWN V4 EY,GIBOBNIA 92728.8127
UU18822411
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Boards of Directors
FROM: Executive Committee
SUBJECT: Summary Report and Recommendations re 1989-90 Joint Works Budgets
(Personnel , Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund)
y Recommendation
The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee recommendation
to adopt the enclosed 1989-90 Joint Works Personnel , Operating and Construction
Budgets.
Summary Report
The accompanying budget documents provide detailed information concerning the
proposed Joint Works budgets. The following discussion highlights and
summarizes the recommendations for the three elements of the Joint Works budgets.
r
Personnel (See Blue Report)
New Positions -
- Summary: Staff has previously advised the Directors that major treatment
plant expansion underway and new program implementation to comply with
changing regulatory requirements would require significant staffing
increases to operate and maintain the new facilities and to support
related activities and other required programs.
Over these past few years we have completed and placed into service
$43.5 million of new plant facilities and equipment. We currently have
A.. $105 million in new treatment plant facilities under construction that
will be placed into service during the 1989-90 budget year; and $31
million in individual District facilities under construction. An
additional $195 million in treatment facilities and $55 million in
collection facilities are under design and will be constructed and placed
into service over the next few years. The 30-year Master Plan now being
considered by the Boards recommends additional major facilities.
This year our various departments requested 70 new positions. The General
Manager has reviewed these requests with the Department Heads and is
recommending that the Directors authorize 41 new positions in 1989-90.
Many of these positions will not be filled until later in the year, and
some may not be filled at all if completion of construction projects is
delayed. Four of the 41 positions are part-time. The recommended
positions are in support of a variety of programs as summarized in the
following table:
i
Memo to Boards of Directors
Page Two
May 24, 1989
u
Summary of Additional Staffing Requests
Program/System Positions it
Finance and Management
i
Support Services (Accounting, Purchasing, 6 u
Warehousing, MIS/EDP)
Risk Management/Safety Engineering 1
V
Operations and Maintenance
Odor Control and Air Scrubbing Systems 2 y
Sewage Collection Systems - 2
General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 4
Technical Services
Regulatory Compliance 4
Source Control Program 5
Process Monitoring & Laboratory 2
Engineering
u
Facilities Planning & Design 5
Construction Management 10
u
Total 41
I '
u
The recommended new positions would raise the authorized staffing level from 497
to 538, an increase of approximately 8%.
Annual Cost
Based on the anticipated need to fill the new positions over the course of the
next year, the recommendations would add $1,191,689, approximately 6.5%, to the
Fiscal Year 1989-90 salary budget. The maximum future annual salary cost
assuming all positions are filled at the top step is $1,489,260. An additional i .
27% would be added to the total to reflect the costs of employee benefits paid
by the Districts, including retirement, health, life and disability insurance,
workers compensation, unemployment insurance and uniforms.
W
Pending Classification/Organizational Studies
The three-year memoranda of understanding (MOUs) which were,approved by the
Boards for the period from November 1987 through November 1990 contained
provisions for certain classification studies. These studies are now underway
I
u
r
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989
Page Three
r
by two outside consulting firms and are expected to be completed by early
1989-90. It is anticipated that modifications will be recommended to some
existing classifications and salary ranges. The classifications being studied
are:
Unit Classifications
r
Administration & Clerical All except Warehouse classes
Operations & Maintenance Plant Maintenance Division
Four Specialized Sr. Plant Operators
Control Center Clerks
Technical Services Laboratory Division
Compliance Division
Lead Industrial Waste Inspectors
Engineering None
The Districts have several projects under various stages of development or
construction to improve security at the plants. Many of these projects will be
completed during the next year. As part of this effort we are evaluating the
need for security personnel , primarily to monitor and to control access at the
�+ entry gates. Upon completion of the study next fiscal year, a recommendation
will be submitted to the Boards on the staffing requirements for this needed
function.
r
We are also proposing an organizational study over the next year to determine
the need and place in the organization for a customer service type of division.
Soon all Districts (but No. 14) will have implemented supplemental user fee
r° programs and it is expected that this division would be responsible for
administering the user fee program (now in six Districts), and the large
industrial/commercial user fee program in all Districts.
r
Staff will return to the Boards with a specific recommendations as the studies
are completed. There is no appropriation in the 1989-90 budget for any changes
that might be forthcoming from the recommendations. However, any budgetary
increases could be funded from payroll savings or reserves.
The following summarizes the personnel/staffing recommendations:
r
Management Department
Personnel Office: A Risk and Safety Manager position is recommended to
administer all risk management activities including group medical plan
coordination, workers compensation, liability and property insurance and
to expand the existing safety program. ,
Finance Department
r - Accounting: An additional Accounting Technician position is recommended
to assist with accounts receivable and accounts and contracts payable and
to provide needed back-up and relief in other accounting areas.
r
i
W
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989 i..
Page Four
- Warehousing: A Senior Storeskeeper position is recommended to assume
leadman duties as the Plant No. 2 warehouse expands and completes the
transition from a satellite facility. W
- Information Services: This Division was formed last year and minor
reorganization and expansion is now recommended. The existing W
Programmer/Analyst is recommended for an upgrade to Information Services
Specialist and the existing position is recommended to be down-rated to
better reflect responsibilities. One additional Programmer and two i
additional Information Services Technician II positions are recommended to �+
provide repair, maintenance and support services required by our expanding
use of computers.
W
Operations and Maintenance Department
- Plant Maintenance: This Division is requesting a new Foreman position to
be responsible for groundskeeping and landscaping crews and for outside
contractors. Three additional Helper positions are recommended to provide
painting, groundskeeping, digester and general maintenance and ,janitorial I '
services throughout the plants. W
- Collection Facilities: One Collection Facilities Worker II and one
Collection Facilitiei Worker I positions are recommended to supplement
existing crews as several new interceptor sewers are nearing completion
and will be placed into service soon.
- Mechanical Maintenance: One Lead Mechanic position is recommended to W
upgrade the off hours, weekend or swing shift, preventive maintenance
program and an additional Mechanic is recommended primarily for the new
odor control facilities that will be operational next year at both plants. ■,
Technical Services Department
I '
- Compliance: A new classification of Compliance Supervisor is recommended W
to reflect a reorganization of this Division and to provide supervision
for the quality assurance/quality control section and for the marine I '
monitoring/marine science section, allowing the deletion of two Principal W
Environmental Specialist positions. The air quality section is proposed
to be supervised by a new Engineer position which will allow the deletion
of an Associate Engineer position. One additional Environmental y
Specialist III and three additional Environmental Specialist II positions
are requested to support the ongoing quality assurance/quality control
work, the marine studies program, the air quality program and to improve
District-wide sampling, analysis and evaluation.
- Laboratory: A salary range increase is recommended for three vacant
aboratory Supervisor positions to more adequately reflect supervisory W
responsibilities in the three Laboratory sections. An additional
Principal Lab Analyst is recommended for mid-year to operate a new i
$300,000 gas chromatograph/mass spectrophotometer. The transfer of
some quality assurance/quality control work to the Compliance Division
r
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989
Page Five
r
will allow deletion of two Senior Lab Analyst positions. One entry level
Lab Analyst I position and two additional Part-time Assistant positions
.d are also recommended.
- Source Control : A new Engineer position is recommended to assume
supervisory responsibility in the enforcement section, to develop overall
enforcement strategies and procedures and to provide technical supervision.
Two Assistant Engineer positions are recommended to work in the
enforcement and pretreatment sections. Expansion of the monitoring and
enforcement programs will require three additional Industrial Waste
Inspector positions.
d
Engineering Department
- Director of Engineering: All of the clerical staff for the Engineering
Department is budgeted in this office and an additional Senior Steno Clerk
.. position is recommended for the increasing work load.
- Plannin and Desi n: The 30-year Master Plan being considered by the
trec ors points out the need for many new facilities in the future.
Accordingly five new positions are recommended for this Division to
provide project leadership and to allow development of the professional
staff. These positions are an Engineer, an Associate Engineer, an
.. Assistant Engineer, an Engineering Aide II and a Part-time Assistant.
- Construction Management: Project management and construction inspection
needs are also project ea to increase in the future. An Engineer, a
Principal Construction Inspector, a Senior Construction Inspector and
four Construction Inspector positions are recommended to accommodate this
workload and to decrease our dependence on outside consultants. An
Engineering Aide III and a Part-time Assistant are also recommended to
provide needed support to the engineering and inspection staff.
r Projected Payroll Cost
- The full employment payroll estimate is $26.6 million, but we expect to
realize a payroll savings of approximately 10% due to personnel turnover,
delays in filling new positions, tight control over hiring activities,
temporary adjustments in plant operation schedules and procedures to
minimize staffing, and delays in major construction schedules. Our total
—' payroll cost is therefore targeted at $23.7 million.
- Net payroll and benefits, after chargeouts to CORF and the Districts,
,d account for approximately 40% of the total budgeted Joint Operating Costs.
- The actual payroll savings may be affected by pending classification and
organizational studies previously discussed as there are no provisions in
r the budget for any changes that might be forthcoming from those studies.
Any proposed changes will be considered by the full Board prior to
implementation.
r
i
W
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989 �+
Page Six
JOINT OPERATING BUDGET - JO (Green Report)
- The $44.53 million Joint Operating budget finances the operating and W
maintenance costs of the joint treatment works and the joint
administrative activities.
W
- The major factors that are causing increases in our Joint Works operating
and maintenance costs include:
- Regulatory Requirements: more stringent air pollution control
requirements mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (AQMD) for control and reduction of hydrogen sulfide (H2S),
oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and oxides of sulfur (SOx) emissions, u
resulting in significantly higher chemical costs to remove pollutants
from the digester gas produced in our treatment plants and control
emissions from our digester gas-fired engines.
- increased casts for engineering, monitoring, enforcement, outside and
in-house laboratory services and special project activities carried out
by the Compliance, Laboratory and Source Control staffs to comply with
the ocean monitoring and pretreatment program provisions of our NPDES
permit as well as our AQMD permit requirements
- increased costs for use of higher volumes of chemicals such as ferric
chloride and anionic polymer used in our physical/chemical treatment
systems to improve solids removal efficiencies as required to maintain
compliance with the discharge limits set forth in our NPDES permit
- Sludge Disposal: a proposed 50% increase in tipping fees effective
July i, 1989 at the Coyote Canyon landfill , as well as increased costs W
for hauling and disposal in a private landfill of waste-activated
sludge and grit and screenings which the Regional Water Quality Control �
Board has determined cannot be disposed of at the Coyote Canyon landfill ;
and higher costs for private reuse alternatives to landfill disposal
- Odor Control : increased chemical usage for expanded odor control
program including 20 new foul air scrubbers as well as increases in
the unit cost of caustic soda
- Repairs and Maintenance: increased maintenance and repair activities y
throughout the Distn cts' expanded and upgraded treatment facilities
- Comparison with 1988-89 Budget: The accompanying excerpt from Schedule A y
of the Joint Operating-Budget (Green Report) highlights the comparisons
between the proposed 1989-90 budget and last year's budget and also 1
summarizes the reasons for the increases (and decreases) by major budget
category.
- Increase Over 1988-89 Budget: The $5.6 million increase is 14.5% over the
1988-89 budget. Of this, 8.8% (or more than 60% of the increase) is r,
directly attributable to regulatory mandates such as improved wastewater
treatment and AQMD regulations requiring significant improvements in
�.I
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989
Page Seven
control of air emissions, and increased costs for chemicals, as well as
the ocean monitoring, pretreatment and toxics control requirements set
forth in our NPDES permit. The remaining portion of the increase, or
about 5.7% (40% of the increase) is due to inflation-related increases in
the costs of operating and maintaining expanded facilities and to
accommodate additional flows into our treatment facilities.
r
Self-Funded Insurance Plans
The Districts have been self-insured for several types of coverage for the last
eleven years as a result of Fiscal Policy Committee recommendations that were
implemented by the Joint Boards of Directors.
Workers' Compensation and Public Liability
- The Workers' Compensation and Public Liability plans have been in
existence since 1979.
- The savings realized through these self-insured plans plus in-lieu
premiums deposited and interest earnings on the reserves in these funds
have resulted in a current reserve level of $2.3 million, compared to the
original $500,000 reserve level set by the Boards when the plans were
established. The Committee recommends that the reserve level proposed for
—' 1989-90 for the Workers' Compensation fund be maintained and the reserve
level in the fully self-insured Public Liability Fund be increased to
$1.7 million.
- An appropriation of $155,000 for in-lieu premium contributions by the
Districts is recommended in the Workers' Compensation Fund to maintain the
existing reserve level at $699,000.
- A $265,000 appropriation has been included in the Public Liability Fund
for excess loss insurance in the event the current study and the
potential availability of this coverage is deemed desirable by the
Directors.
- The Fiscal Policy Committee is again recommending that the Boards of the
individual Districts continue the practice of setting aside reserve funds
to partially cover deductible levels for the Districts' all-risk property
insurance coverage. The reserves are recommended to increase an additional
$1 million to the $5 million level for 1989-90.
Health Plan (Schedule VII, Goldenrod)
r
- The Self-funded Employee Health Plan has been in existence for the past ten
years. Our claims experience in 1988-89 appears to indicate that the cost
containment provisions enacted in 1984, which include both increased
deductible requirements and co-payment levels, have been somewhat effective
r
W
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989 �+
Page Eight
W
in helping to stabilize our claims levels on a per-employee basis. Although
total costs have increased in response to continuing increases in the total
numbers of active employees, their dependents, and retired employees
participating in the plan, the cost per employee covered has decreased.
- These increased total medical care costs required transfers into this fund
during the past year over and above the anticipated premiums. However, we
have partially recovered some of these expenditures from increased premiums
paid by employees for family coverage. Staff expects that the increased
Districts' and employees contribution level authorized by the Boards during
approval of the salary and benefits agreements negotiated with the employee
groups in 1987-88 will also reduce any required transfers in 1989-90. We
expect these changes, and new cost containment provisions that are also W
included, will enable this fund to be self-supporting by the end of the
three-year MOU period. Budgeted District premiums are equal to premiums
approved for the HMO plans. `+
- Disability payments for short and long-term disability were unusually high in
1988-89. There is a two-year limit for long-term disability payments and
this expense is expected to decrease over the next two years.
CORF BUDGET (Yellow Report)
- Summary: The $102.7 million Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) Budget
finances the construction of the Joint Treatment Works Facilities. It
includes major and minor projects which have generally been previously
presented to the Boards for review as part of the Master Plan and/or W
agenda process. Any project under $15,000 requires informal bidding.
Projects over $15,000 require formal bidding, and any projects over
$25,000 require Board approval in accordance with District procurement W
regulations. The budget is prepared under Scenario 2 assumptions included
in the 30-year Master Plan now under consideration by the Directors. i
- Source of funds: The budget will be financed from existing capital funds
accumulated in the individual Districts' Capital Facilities Funds,
proceeds from the 1986 sale of Certificates of Participation, new
connection fees and from limited Federal and State grant funds. 4'
- Master-Planned Projects: The 1989-90 CORF requirements total
T102,725'000, an increase of $7,745,000 over 1988-89. The budget u
includes funds for several major master-planned projects, including
completing the construction of the new headworks at Plant 1, the new
outfall booster station at Plant 2. Also included are the central power W
generation facilities at both plants, and additional primary treatment
and sludge handling facilities at Plant 1, completion of a new plant
entrance, interior circulation roads, expansion of the administration
building and the construction of a new central laboratory.
- Proiect Categorization: Schedule B-2 entitled Classification of Budgeted
Projects by Revenue Program Categories classifies all the proposed y
1989-90 capital outlay projects into three categories to assist the
W
Memo to Boards of Directors
May 24, 1989
Page Nine
V
Directors in evaluating the need for the proposed levels of expenditures.
These categories are:
- Replacement/Reconstruction Projects - These projects are required to
replace ar rehabil to a agi—ng�teriorated equipment or structures.
- Improvement/Upgrade Projects - These projects are mandated by various
regulatory agencies, including the EPA, State-Regional Water Quality
Control Boards, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and other
local agencies.
- Additional Capacity/Increased Hydraulic Requirements Projects - These
projects are requ red to accommodate increase hydraulic requirements
(additional flows) that the Joint Works facilities must process and
dispose of over the next five to ten years, as identified in the latest
Joint Works Master Plan.
The $102,725,000 in proposed CORF projects is allocated to these three
categories as follows:
Project Category 1989-90 Budget Allocation
Replacement/Reconstruction $ 37,658,000
V
Improvement/Upgrade 6,415,000
Increased Hydraulic Requirements 58,652,000
Total 1989-90 CORF Budget Request $102,725,000
The staff is available to answer any questions from the Directors. If you desire
V additional information before the meeting, please contact Wayne Sylvester or
Gary Streed at (714) 962-2411.
r
r
V '
r.
r
IYFn JOIn OYdlln flPD WRF flNylE A
Ytlln
Mont"6 I.Min to'lM1Y n.Yp<m BYOFI IImEt1EXA M. Ylnn
0) U) Im (0) (E)
rcnfx
Ilyn. IW-n M I. in qu w. roGl
EYGM In&Y mqn IHnol. la nni vimmm wfx vpbtl m.v<itltl
�ry � y<DiWtlu E4WIm � Inn.x Iglaffrrf0<eruml
1. Mt LI<H r.Yyn t tI5,4tl,W] El].Y].YO E MAN Ilm',. U.M.- Lp[t m-I-'-1g1erW.t 1-1 no m n1 DI pintq GMrl W
.1. rlltlnul EI Wltluul pltttw rlll G Yff<D In uu W y<r
p11Mll Y P{pM1 I—no"npltmrr Dogl 1.eHlutlr,.1.10
MIf r .Iy IwGllp.1r W pW.11,MImHq<ulYut W
pilr.W r mnwmin oo,.IGIWIq u+GfOony amr mifnl
W pH.11 G..W.Gun oMgr.
-I gplr.M Irvn W YOI M-
-I.M1tlr�t nqN.Glp"It
.t p.Hlnll Wnlu Ill qnm
nG raNHlm s1 YL
ImgW
f. Wr Wtgl stMul f.lY,pV O.Y).QO 2E1.000 M.. EY,DY DWle.l jWrvfpj Nron.O.—ur fxmWfOgia.fH
qI n
nlarlw NW.[WI Uaq.iergftl E)br<t. I .1..
net plu burl.or Ili mpfp
ux H W<]IIMxf prlq mvNs[lu.
.aft ENt nl.no I.-Mr.1.ulmq W WNmYI
(linos IUugfb) lost <Ir u/Lqf. ppryy)Dfgru G
eb m Ilmi 1 no G Im4.1 Abrw
xnlb l Gum n wr m wGnt rl W.
Ibbgn v.MM (Y,tltl> (Jun elfmttlnq.
,.I YI.Hb In.Ym mewl.gift.In HE.mr D.l(AMP
NI.mewl
r.T<YeHla IY.M t—W pgwlbMlpl wlrY In,
A.utl priory<Ixlnx W.—.
Alm uW fp Alflb...
PoIrWf ol,m— Ufp.lnorw.f rlq Ion—
J....
1. FNgflwl t mn4xt LIM.M I...OY .Y.DY EG.M pt.lpp -Dq GYrM M re.G i Mpn
r.nlm
I. mllb 1-1 E Olmful .,mD.M s.W.Wtl .n,nl W,M I,IY.nI -Iulgf.lA Inblll 11n1.1-
-I-1.CI<pul x.n fp Drinu....I ptlw on.
Iault
01 Avon.mY1nGu p u nIo
L Erlywt Wrpu In.nO fY,RO N.DY ol'. -lip..<.In w.f Mq Igllont.
0. INl rf]Iu111WIn0
i1Y.. f.nl.m W.w I... M.Ml J Ido M1r most..1.W r.p.1n In q.IM W yqW
Sq<Inr/rupllr I.I"Itlp W..mw.l 4ipnt
1. trgM t.l... 2.201 t.DA,tln Ilw.., un,WI -0igf.W G tl.Nir H n I011ltlu 1.qmn dIIMN
ImMM.G il,W.' On"..mpl W Hrqu rnl I.—
e. YNlur e.oY.tln 1.IDl.mo F0.01 eY.DY I.... -Iu1gf..Y 111.enrN pHq IMgq yr Dqt IWIq W.W
.mt,.)uN4.n W IwWG Gmww.
D. YGrww.l..supp". I.... I.MAN M.M In.YD En.6C -I...In WGR olu<uf.GrtW Wlpnl tllwpf.
-sq.twr rer q0 Druid.w pa.up fq..
ID. GGe blq(gr.Hq W.Y].rm Ye.niem Y.Ya.M n.Ns.WO IO.In.Yo
Ipnl..
Il. trvWq W YfrH. I IY IDO On. . On
n. wt blot gr<tlq lY.Y].tt0 Ir.Y1.Yr SI.II..YI Y.IA.M n.W.nD
Ppnx<
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
PERSONNEL
_ RECOMMENDATIONS
PN0TATION
`to4alitan O �l
O
O Snce 19sk +l
�gNGE CO�N�
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
M ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
10AAA ELLIS AVENUE
May 1 1989 vo.eox E127
y , FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
71419624411
MEMORANDUM
TO: Boards of Directors
SUBJECT: Recommended Personnel and Organizational Changes for Fiscal Year 1989-90
BACKGROUND
During the annual budget preparation process the staff evaluates personnel
requirements for the upcoming fiscal year. This review of staffing needs takes
into consideration anticipated new programs, the start-up of new facilities and
the ongoing maintenance and operation of the existing Joint Works Treatment
Facilities and the individual District's collection systems. Staff
recommendations for the 1989-90 fiscal year are contained in this report.
_ SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff has previously advised the Directors that major treatment plant expansion
underway and new program implementation to comply with changing regulatory
.. requirements would require significant staffing increases to operate and
maintain the new facilities and to support related activities and other required
programs.
Over these past few years we have completed and placed into service $43.5 million
of new plant facilities and equipment. We currently have $105 million in new
treatment plant facilities under construction that will be placed into service
during the 1989-90 budget year; and $31 million in individual District facilities
under construction. An additional $195 million in treatment facilities and
$55 million in collection facilities are under design and will be constructed
and placed into service over the next few years. The 30-year Master Plan now
being considered by the Boards recommends additional major facilities.
This year our various departments requested 70 new positions. The General
Manager has reviewed these requests with the Department Heads and is recommending
that the Directors authorize 41 new positions in 1989-90. Many of these
positions will not be filled until later in the year, and some may not be filled
at all if completion of construction projects is delayed. Four of the 41
positions are part-time. The recommended positions are in support of a variety
of programs as summarized in the following table:
Summary of Additional Staffing Requests
Program/System Positions
Finance and Management
Support Services (Accounting, Purchasing, 6
Warehousing, MIS/EDP)
Risk Management/Safety Engineering 1
Operations and Maintenance r
Odor Control and Air Scrubbing Systems 2
Sewage Collection Systems 2
General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 4
Technical Services
Regulatory Compliance 4
Source Control Program 5
Process Monitoring & Laboratory 2
Engineering
Facilities Planning & Design 5
Construction Management 10
Total 41
The recommended new positions would raise the authorized staffing level from 497
to 538, an increase of approximately 8%.
ANNUAL COST •
Based on the anticipated need to fill the new positions over the course of the
next year, the recommendations would add $1,191,689, approximately 6.5%, to the .,
Fiscal Year 1989-90 salary budget. The total net salary cost of the proposed
organizational changes and classification adjustments detailed in this report
for both next year and future years, when all positions are eventually filled,
is summarized on a departmental basis as follows:
Department Net Cost of Salary Changes
r
1989-90 Future Maximum
Management $ 45,423 $ 60,564
Finance 154,989 215,688
Operations & Maintenance 186,720 213,408
Technical Services 287,075 424,956
Engineering 517,482 574,644
Total $1,191,689 $1,489,260
s
An additional 27% would be added to the total to reflect the costs of employee
benefits paid by the Districts, including retirement, health, life and
disability insurance, workers compensation, unemployment insurance and uniforms.
_2-
r
PENDING CLASSIFICATION/ORGANIZATIONAL STUDIES
The three-year memoranda of understanding (MOUs) which were approved by the
Boards for the period from November 1987 through November 1990 contained
-- provisions for certain classification studies. These studies are now underway
by two outside consulting firms and are expected to be completed by early
1989-90. It is anticipated that modifications will be recommended to some
existing classifications and salary ranges. The classifications being studied
are:
Unit Classifications
Administration & Clerical All except Warehouse classes
Operations & Maintenance Plant Maintenance Division
Four Specialized Sr. Plant Operators
Control Center Clerks
Technical Services Laboratory Division
Compliance Division
Lead Industrial Waste Inspectors
Engineering None
_ The Districts have several projects under various stages of development or
construction to improve security at the plants. Many of these projects will be
completed during the next year. As part of this effort we are evaluating the
need for security personnel , primarily to monitor and to control access at the
entry gates. Upon completion of the study next fiscal year, a recommendation
will be submitted to the Boards on the staffing requirements for this needed
function.
We are also proposing an organizational study over the next year to determine
the need and place in the organization for a customer service type of division.
Soon all Districts (but No. 14) will have implemented supplemental user fee
programs and it is expected that this division would be responsible for
_ administering the user fee program (now in six Districts) , and the large
industrial/commercial user fee program in all Districts.
Staff will return to the Boards with a specific recommendations as the studies
are completed. There is no appropriation in the 1989-90 budget for any changes
that might be forthcoming from the recommendations. However, any budgetary
increases could be funded from payroll savings or reserves.
DISCUSSION OF RECOMMENDED STAFFING INCREASES
The following discussion provides a summary explanation of the recommended
changes for 1989-90, the cost of which is detailed by organizational unit in
Exhibit A, and by position classification in Exhibit B. We have also included
revised organizational charts reflecting the changes.
MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
The Management Department includes the General Manager's Office, the Board
Secretary's office, the Public Information Office, the Management Support Office,
- and the Personnel and Safety Office. Nineteen positions are currently
authorized in this department.
r
3-
2150 - Personnel and Safety Office
In addition to the general personnel functions of recruiting,
administering benefits and managing MOUs with employee groups, our
Personnel Office is also responsible for the Districts' safety program.
A Risk and Safety Manager ($3883 - $5047) is recommended to administer
all risk management activities including group medical plan coordination,
workers compensation, liability and property insurance, and to expand the
safety program which currently includes one employee and intermittent use
of an outside consultant.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
The Administration and Finance Department includes the Director of Finance's •
Office, the Accounting Division, the Purchasing and Warehouse Division and the
Information Services Division. Forty positions are currently authorized in this
department. .�
2210 - Director of Finance's Office
No changes are currently recommended in this office.
2220 - Accounting Division
r
An additional Accounting Technician ($1848 - $2301) position is
recommended for this division. This position will assist with accounts -
receivable and accounts payable and will provide needed back-up in other ..
accounting functions.
2230 Purchasing and Warehouse Division
.t
The addition of a Senior Storeskeeper ($2239 - $2788) position is
recommended to assume the leadman duties at the Plant No. 2 warehouse.
This facility has become more active and has changed from a satellite +
operation to a full service warehouse which requires first line
supervision. A new, larger warehousing facility will be built at Plant 2
next year. .,
2240 - Information Services Division
This division was added in the 1988-89 budget to coordinate and maximize r
utilization of computerization in all Departments. The division has been
effective in reducing our reliance on consultants and is in constant
demand for problem solving and implementation of management information ..
systems.
Our existing Programmer/Analyst is recommended for an upgrade to an
Information Services Specialist ($3565 - $4635) position which is more w
commensurate with the duties.
The existing Programmer/Analyst position is then recommended to be r
down-rated following the above reclassification. The new range
($3241 - $4036) will fall midway between Programmer and Information
Services Specialist, better reflecting the respective responsibilities .�
and a more balanced organizational structure.
r
-4-
r
An additional Programmer ($2603 - $3241) is recommended to keep up with
demand for program modifications, especially in the areas of plant
process monitoring and compliance. These programmers assist all
divisions with database management software.
Two Information Services Technician II ($2208 - $2750) positions are
recommended to provide technical and repair service for the many
computers and computerized equipment in use. These positions are also
responsible for providing expertise and assistance with many specialized
software applications, such as desktop publishing and in-house graphic
presentations.
.. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
The Operations and Maintenance Department is responsible for the day-to-day,
ongoing operations and maintenance of the Joint Works Treatment Facilities and
the individual Districts collection systems. There are 323 authorized positions
In the department which consists of the following seven divisions:
3310 - General Superintendent's Office
- No changes are currently recommended in this office.
3330 - Plant Maintenance
The Plant Maintenance Division is responsible for digester cleaning,
.. grounds maintenance, painting, plumbing, carpentry, janitorial services
and general labor assignments throughout the plants, as well as sludge
hauling and disposal. Fifty-three positions are currently authorized for
this division.
One Foreman ($2568 - $3338) position is recommended for the groundskeeping
and landscaping crews. This specialist will be responsible for all
.. grounds maintenance for our more than 200 acres of treatment plant sites;
including the upgraded perimeter and interior landscaping and will also
administer contracts with private firms for related services.
Three new Helper ($1329 - $1655) positions are recommended to provide
painting, groundskeeping, digester and general maintenance and janitorial
services throughout the plants.
3340 - Collection Facilities
One Collection Facilities Worker II ($1821 - $2268) and one Collection
Facilities Worker I ($1329 - $ 1655) are recommended to supplement
existing crews which maintain more than 800 miles of trunkline sewers
with 81 siphons, 33 pumping stations and other spots that require
frequent maintenance. Several new interceptor sewers are nearing
- - completion and will be placed in to service soon.
3350 - Mechanical Maintenance
This division is responsible for maintaining the wide variety of
mechanical equipment throughout the two treatment plants, including
stationary engines, pumps, hydraulic systems and belt filter presses as
well as the vehicle fleet and the portable/emergency equipment.
-5-
r
One Lead Mechanic ($2513 - $3129) position is recommended to upgrade the
preventive maintenance program during off hours and will be assigned to
lead a weekend or swing shift crew.
An additional Mechanic ($1951 - $2429) is recommended to do entry level
work and to assist the ,journeymen, primarily in the new odor control
facilities that will be placed into service next year at bath plants. *'
3360 - Electrical Maintenance
No changes are currently recommended.
3370 - Instrumentation
r
No changes are currently recommended.
3380 - Plant Operations r
No changes are currently recommended.
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The Technical Services Department is responsible for source control
programs, the analytical laboratory which performs testing and analysis r
to monitor treatment plant processes and industrial discharges to assure
compliance with environmental standards, administration of the $2 million
ocean monitoring program and the Districts' efforts to comply with the ..
wide variety of laws and regulations which govern our operations. There
are currently 73 authorized positions in the following Divisions.
3510 - Director of Technical Service's Office r
No changes are currently recommended in this office.
r
3520 - Compliance
Establishment of a new classification for two new Compliance Supervisor av
($3482 - $4527) positions is recommended to provide supervision for the
quality assurance/quality control section and for the marine
monitoring/marine science section. The Districts' source control
program, laboratory, outside contractors and day-to-day plant and
laboratory activities require a major quality assurance/quality control
program. The marine monitoring/marine science program is also proposed
to be expanded and some of the outside contract responsibilities will be •
moved in-house.
An Engineer ($3482 - $4527) position is recommended as section supervisor
and project engineer for regulatory/legislative air quality projects,
technical oversight and evaluation of air quality issues.
The deletion of one Associate Engineer ($3057 - $3974) position is
recommended to provide for the above reclassification to more properly
reflect the expanding duties and responsibilities related to air quality
regulations. - r
Two Principal Environmental Specialist ($3057 - $3974) positions will be
deleted when incumbents are reclassified to the new Compliance Supervisor
recommended above, to more properly reflect the nature of their duties.
-6-
•
_ One Environmental Specialist III ($2675 - $3331) position is recommended
for addition to the quality assurance/quality control section to improve
District-wide sampling, analysis and evaluation.
Three additional Environmental Specialist II ($2398 - $2985) positions
are recommended to support the quality assurance/quality control , the
marine studies program and the air quality engineer.
3580 - Laboratory
A 13.9% salary range adjustment is recommended for three vacant Laboratory
-- Supervisor ($3482 - $4527) positions to more adequately reflect new
section supervisory responsibilities for high level scientific oversight
of lab sections in the organic analysis, general analysis and methods
development sections.
An additional Principal Lab Analyst ($2593 - $3371) position is
_ recommended for mid-year to operate a new $300,000 gas chromatograph/mass
spectrophotometer instrument and to function as a group leader in this
highly technical field.
The transfer of some quality assurance/quality control responsibilities
and the bioassay evaluation work to the Compliance Division will allow
the deletion of two Senior Lab Analyst ($2550 - $3175) positions.
One entry level Lab Analyst I ($2048 - $2550) position is recommended to
provide bench work to cover the increasing work load.
There are currently two part-time classifications in the laboratory. The
Part-time Technician ($8.47/hr. max) position is recommended for deletion
and transfer to the Part-time Assistant ($8.36/hr. max) classification.
- - Two additional Part-time Assistant positions are recommended to provide
economical weekend lab bench work and to take required beach samples.
We generally hire students in the sciences to do much of this work.
3590 - Source Control
This Division needs to expand in high level technical expertise and
- supervision so that we can step up our enforcement efforts against
companies that violate our industrial waste ordinance; and to implement
the new waste minimization program.
Accordingly, a new Engineer ($3482 - $4527) position is recommended to
assume supervisory responsibility in the enforcement section, to develop
overall enforcement strategies and procedures and to provide project
technical management.
Two additional Assistant Engineer ($2577 - $3351) positions are
recommended. One is for the enforcement section to monitor and
administer "significantly violating companies", to perform special
enforcement actions and to assist in preparation of actions to be taken
.- against violators. The other is to work in the permit section to
evaluate and approve pretreatment system submittals and to assist in
administering the permit renewal process. ,
-7-
r
Three additional Industrial Waste Inspector II ($2333 - $2905) positions
are recommended. One will replace an Industrial Waste Inspector I
($2076 - $2585) position to recognize the need for higher level
technicians for the monitoring and enforcement programs. •
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
The three divisions of the Engineering Department include 42 authorized
positions. Additionally ten temporary construction inspectors, who receive no
benefits, are currently employed and eight consultants are on site through
professional services contracts. The Department is responsible for planning and
managing the Districts' facilities expansion and improvement projects. The
recommended Joint Works Treatment Facilities budget estimates capital
expenditures of $640 million over the next ten years.
In order to administer this expansive treatment plant construction program as well
as the trunk sewer construction program, staff is recommending the addition of .,
15 positions in the Engineering Department. Because the program will be
ongoing for many years, several of these new staff positions are intended to
enable us to enhance our in-house capabilities and phase out the need for •
on-site construction management consultants. This will result in considerable
cost savings for administering our capital facilities programs in the future.
3710 - Director of Engineering's Office r
An additional Senior Steno Clerk ($1738 - $2163) is recommended for the
Increasing clerical workload. r,
3520 - Planning and Design
One additional Engineer ($3482 - $4527) position is recommended to •
function as a project manager additional facilities recommended in the
recently completed 30-year master plan.
•
An Associate Engineer ($3057 - $3974) position is recommended to assist
the project managers in facilities planning and design activities.
A new Assistant Engineer ($2577 - $3351) position is recommended to ~`
provide an entry level engineering position to allow development of staff
from within.
r
An Engineering Aide 11 ($2149 - $2675) position is recommended to
provide needed technical support to the professional staff.
A Part-time Assistant ($8.36/hr. max) position, which receives no
benefits, is recommended to provide low cost specialized support
services. Engineering students are generally used to staff these
part-time positions. •
3790 - Construction Management
r
One additional Engineer ($3842 - $4527) position is recommended because
of the increasing number and complexity of construction projects. This
position will function as a project engineer. r
r
-8-
r
One additional Principal Construction Inspector ($3057 - $3974) and one
additional Senior Construction Inspector ($2905 - $3617) position are
recommended to provide supervision and high-level inspection of major
construction projects to ensure compliance with the plans and
specifications.
Four Construction Inspector (E2657 - $3309) positions are recommended
because of the increasing workload, to replace existing temporary
inspectors.
An Engineering Aide III ($2365 - $2945) position is recommended to
perform work related to as-built drawings, change order and engineering
calculations and to provide drafting support to the engineering and
inspection staff.
One new Part-time Assistant ($8.36/hr. max) position, is also recommended
�- to provide low cost specialized support services in this division.
- g_
778/89
.. DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED 1989-90 PERSONNEL CHANGES
A B C D E F
Currently Proposed Revised Annual
_ Dept Authorized New Total Cost
No. Department/ Division Positions Positions Positions (Savings)
2150 GENERAL MANAGER 1 1
Management Support 10 10
,3 Personnel 8 1 9 60.564
19 1 20 60.564
-5
6 2210 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 5 5
2220 Accounting 13 1 14 27,612
.d 2230 Purchasing & Warehouse 16 1 17 33,456
9 2240 Information Systems 6 4 10 154.620
3 40 6 46 215.688
12 3310 GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT 17 17
�3 3330 Plant Maintenance 53 4 57 99,636
,,4 3340 Collection Facilities 25 2 27 47,076
15 3350 Mechanical Maintenance 60 2 62 66.696
'S 3360 Electrical Maintenance 26 26
1 3370 Instrumentation 24 24
18 3380 Plant Operations 118 118
`9 323 8 331 213.408
1
21 3510 DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES 4 4
"? 1 3520 Compliance 9 4 13 167.340
3 3580 Laboratory 31 2 33 49,308
'4 3590 Source Control 29 5 34 208,308
?5 73 .11 84 424.956
a
771 3710 DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING 6 1 7 25,956
2B 3720 Planning & Design 15 5 20 191,712
3 3790 Construction Management 21 9 30 356,976
'A 42 15 57 574,644
31
! TOTAL 497 41 538 1.489,260
PERS90A.XLS i .on ow
5/25/89 PROPOSED PERSONNEL CHANGES EXHIBIT B
By POSITION CLASSIFICATION •
1989.50
A B C D 1 F
Step 5 Annual
Current Proposed Proposed Monthly Coat
No. Classification Auth Add Delete Auth Rate (Savings)
1 2150 General Manager's Office
2 Board Secretary
3 Management Support
4 Personnel ,.
Risk and Safety Manager 1 l 5,e17 60,564
5
6 2210 Director of finance's Office ..
1 2220 Accounting
8 Accounting Technician I 1 2 2,301 21,61E
9 2230 Purchasing/warehousing
10 Senior Storeskeeper 1 1 2 2,788 33.456
11 2240 Information Services
12 Info Services Specialist 1 I 2 4,635 55,520
13 Programmer/ Analyst 1 1 4,527 -54.324
11 Programmer/ Analyst 1 1 2 4,036 48,432
15 Programmer 1 1 2 3,211 38,892 40
16 Info Services Tech II E 2 2,750 66,000
17
18 3310 General Superintendent's Office
19 3330 Plant Maintenance
20 Foreman 4 1 . 5 3,338 40.056
21 Helper 7 3 10 1,655 55,580
22 3340 Collection Facilities ow
23 Coll Pic worker 21 9 1 10 21268 11.216
24 CD11 Pic Yorker I 4 1 5 1,655 19,860
25 3350 Mechanical Maintenance r'
26 Lead Mechanic 10 1 11 3,129 37,540
27 Mechanic 19 1 20 21429 29,148
28 3360 Electrical Maintenance
29 3370 Instrumentation
30 3380 Plant Operations
r
1
PERS90B.XLS 2:23 PN
r
S/25/B9 PROPOSED PERSONNEL CHANGES EXHIBIT B
r BY POSITION CLASSIFICATION
198E-90
r A B C D B P
Step 5 Annual
Current Proposed Proposed Monthly Cost
No. Classification Auth Add Delete Total Rate ISavingsl
31 3510 Director of Technical Services' Office
32 3520 Compliance
33 Compliance supervisor 2 2 4,527 108.648
34 Prim Environmental Specialist 2 2 3,974 -95,376
35 Environmental Specialist III 2 1 3 3,331 39,972
36 Environmental Specialist II 1 3 4 2.985 101.460
37 Engineer 1 1 4,527 541324
38 Associate Engineer 2 1 1 3,974 -47,680
39 3580 Laboratory
40 Laboratory Supervisor 3 3 4,527 162.972
r 41 Laboratory Supervisor 3 3 3,574 -143.064
42 Prin Laboratory Anaylst 1 1 5 3,371 40,452
43 Sr Laboratory Anaylst 5 3 3,175 -76.200
41 Laboratory Anaylst I 3 1 4 2,550 10,600
45 Part-time Technician 1 1 1,468 -17.616
46 Part-tine Assistant 3 3 6 1,449 52,164
�. 47 3590 Source Control
48 Engineer 1 1 4,527 54,324
49 Assistant Engineer 1 2 3 3,351 aO,124
50 Industrial Waste Insp II 6 3 9 2,905 104,580
51 Industrial Snake Insp I 5 1 4 2,505 -31,020
52
53 3710 Director of Engineering's Office
54 Sr Steno Clerk 2 1 3 2,163 25.956
55 3720 Planning a Design
56 Engineer 3 1 4 1,527 54.324
57 Associate Engineer 1 1 2 3,971 47,698
58 Assistant Engineer 1 - 1 3,351 40,212
59 Engineering Aide II 1 1 2,575 32,100
60 Part-time Assistant 1 1 1,m 17,388
61 3790 Construction Management
62 Engineer 4 1 5 4,527 54,324
53 Prig Construction Insp 2 1 3 3,974 47,688
64 Sr Construction Insp 4 1 5 31617 43,404
65 Construction Insp 5 4 9 3,309 158,832
r 66 Engineering Aide III I 1 2 2,945 35,340
67 Part-time Assistant I 1 1,449 17.388
_ 6s TOTAL 119 52 11 160 1,489.260
PBflMMEL$
2:22 PH
iOLWf vJL@Yil4L1.f@R P]W 1
NIIA
av
o@RTas
@rM1VL 9eKILL
MIIT@ 1YY0111'IFU
Sy
®IWL
IVIIW@
1oAw ELLv @@ilrm an@ r@axwet rnul
A to
LNII Aura e[A]RxR
Am o@LfTa
NYIC IISO Ydl SNXR BIFb1P P@Nb6/IAWLL
MLRU wY M EOI Am etl LOI A9r LIII L 9NRV PIKIYp@ LPMFBLL
xALK® Auum a1MSR
EB pKL]rm.RTAIL i@ pAII]Rf YANL
IIYAK[ pp@]il@tl i MAgT[Ipll@ Fffp11CLL wYlf@ 0001[FP1M]
w vl e. n
o@LLM a E@fRAL olAlruA a olLumc
n@w'1 wumwlx T1aonLu r
wnm FYE]YF@@6
LLLRICN WpikT [WICK RfY wFIT [W141 TLW 9YIM} ILFAIfN
6LR I eA�Aa E@}E] 9L OlA w1]l V[fW.� 9GR[i Em61
MISfAV AY®.
\@ 19l
AffiIRAIR Ab111YR
MOIMdLyr yyriL]y,@py]
UPLXNIOY$ MAIVI@WLfl
IKILtt1Fd
,uY@@
eu,wvw Lax
LVOLIAYLL LAOMaY EM[L LtlTLL i m1411 Nirr
Aaanlq aro wLs euwlyusL vWr a@ east 11R2 Lpt rK I¢p uLx IpX
1] U N A N
H IY 11 1@ 9 l/ 6] X M
NVLIAXLL W EMR@ LY401FH:]Y6 ®@LGOG
AMp Iy1p 5W5 FK1 IML IKL rKL FAR ,LILE9@ IILMAG@ Ltl11aL MAYAw IWK@
WII'@ IYXLU@ Eµ G a[t M4L IGp MP IW MA IIAMAaA
K[eAG[]ra OxA1L E@—U w—L- ER 1.1A M MUL 6R.1 5 M KTUL LR IK[6 M @TALL
PPo%6® 1999-1960
NApAGp¢yP Pot 3
rd m
_ GQIRIL
MXQQ
1
______________
mAw wr,s"PICK WASEWIT sGPP01.t PE0.S9NM.L Orrict
CHIEF EQ AEUP eiFwxMEE on
d I
Em9 5509
b RY.IC 1R0"RR W"Eaff mPPoR Rrm IQmMa
REE E SAPER
eOQD RCY W, GQE0.LL
W 1 PAIm AON ZEST RIDC Am ASR ] m0N5a
MI6 0 mli
4001 C001
Q AIM Am R AEN A9R R AIR WIF PQSONNU QAE
1 0
NR )Ny ]CR AAR
QR ISM RR
0
106� 3109 PR PIPS A95R
- 0
J]R
� Af50I 1IM 1ENT
1
,_ 106b m9i
SP PM"C"
e
ICSN 2865
SLERRQP II
y o
1Rto nR
AIM AIDE
� SEQCIQ9 S 1059t MN PER AiSr
e
IC59E EUl 1059A A411
� u srtlro auR
1
Oi nv
R"PICE AIDE
OSQ WE
STND auc IQa AIDE
0
1O55P e0A0 lOSDA 3101
OTR AID[ R[aPEO am
0
I059 1R5 ]OM 1E15
QI am
D o
Y
IMPOSE DewnCHS E MINTENQR 71UH11101,EMCEES MIAEQIDG
DIRECIM" 4LNWL,., rCIQR BIWu1NEQOER nO r
SERVICES
EL
IK " R UAn R PIKE 5 " R 111, SR PIKpPDJ[I1NR6"ICePx
"TQM
E 3
OVAIL
GO RAID
If➢Rm Ia4mp
IWY[!almllp)I )ml)
1f X
ou n ruurcr
1
- 6]n
1 le 11 IJ
antra 1 Ivmlt armann sunaa ]csmnru rwausa a auvnmc
vro m¢Ira
1 XCn N}14a
e� s]A t WIOYSW'R
XT t
m]
oA saa mu
]
Xn
w]w aR
ad Im
I IF
pymRllAL Ml9
m 4ll 6®ime alO
1 I
� Jia >xfB
1(OAIIWI
]Im
R yaplly
lma JMI m Wrm
— 1
tl6t aIM ]lA
1
� Jl%
aN m6 na It]
]
a Ua ILaI a u<tm
1 1
s Wsa ass lass ]om
m ST9L01
a Ima nm
lmlo ne
,� mo sva Im A
x
lml< nA
mlv
w mo faa t[a t 1
o law ms)
— sm t ]Ra uc tm
1 1
Ima xAl leas WI
uc+ml uc tm )]n]stiva Wva sWx
105x1 3ml la]11 3m1 14a11 3%1 lalel nm
� a alw
0
lml nA
sy
a mna)m[
e
Im6e ]PI6
m slao aax a atasn ala
e )
lmsr as ImV mm
� oma xm[ umn aW[
1 0
]ml lAs iml las
�. am sta)mc a]r
0 1
Ia.TM. IOe>/N.
Y R laT
a
PRGPO$®1,P9-1�P
oeEunas c MIMPSAtld oee\Pn¢M eAGA 4
lll
GENERAL
SWfRIMCNEM
1
6 5T
119 14 197
AZr SVIT OR" AES4 SII[T ME
5509 5509
SP PAh IGR
0
AIp1
11G 5 9 57 ZF 63 36 39
PIJM OP®
maim TECH SWWRT PWRR MIM NANCC COLL 10 PARLIMES MOWICAL EIECIRIERI. DISIRNOR
CMIfP Pl.
MRGE 9A FOR OMAIL SE6 PAGC K 6 90 FCP OCI\IL
rNrem 19M-1990
MIMIOIYIC[YMM1M11[ ew6 U
Jn
_ aMMM
seMnnamMr
+' t
wsl
wn rver WM RRsr mer na
%aR ssoe
a nq,im
0
5019
w
- aRR ewc M ra osera as ela 9c l 0 roR oma
- 5 9
Mw6 fSGI somm,
s
SR aER
s 7
v
N➢ .
9sn
eM anwx serc wwcuJx dM
1 1
.� J9'19 J9H
v-a
RS MR
1
1351
sm I
_ J
IMSI MJI dGR 61M i
d �
1Vi9 MO]
V�1
% SIMC
_. a
Jon nv
.. M RECORw¢FM
l
.. lose mm
aMR
AR.v/N.
v IWeO ISOf 19A
awnan s PPLP)rP ou9mav) revs u
9PPLL
swunrtPwwr
r
eP)
119 IT 19
~ WT WR WO e6}LIR IMI fLWLWRG)OIK21
1 1
99M S9N
P Ix6101
9019
su rae 9c v xo m omu sn vlce P m mna
w ue
vuxr Pwnov
e
Wv atula
x
r 9us
mrt Nry wPm mA
16 1
>lY ))N
W
P PWrt NP RR INP G9P
n 9
TI610 >IA E61Y )IN
a
rnA)@wAY
N
A99 xYA
r
Pu P rrxv
u
w ANc m)
Ltt Lsw n
`C� mslo ' AN
wL aw x
c
r Asly IeW
xwv
o
16$$
vrt uL L,^•
r x
n.wn..
WFORR IM-19W
OPQATIdf 9 Q•J16Q3 W WY'JR ele�C
DI
V
BQQIL
94PUOIIOICOII
1 NST
9 19 IN
IYT MI WQ QQ MI Ir¢x
1 OLIOI./f[Q plPKfe 1
5509 SSW
- rm vw u ro ons¢ sQ eAI u ro mP¢
PLIM MIATPNQtt O1LL eK QQ PItR pfn
..e na IuucQ sQ vI,W so ro Qna
wa
Q fMWll
1
as
r rQnlsl so¢W roYHx
>w sxa ....
a
Im PNIn O =VlID =MER
ty 1 x x
ms% xw msA AQ ASA ffiI
PpWe WQ nt
V A59C AN NOL ill N 2 2
AI91 xW IDMS DV
WE QQ 11
ASV %9l
�P APQ WQ n
s
mu xv1 AI1Ax n 1XIx1Q n
x
]OSx N96 AS]c N%
r
' RAT IQOI t
a
r Asw Nx9
Q QuaxW
- :osw nn
PVODQ t Pin I
0
A56 n15 A56 D15
[yWP WQ 1 RPCE NAII pg1p08¢
0 l 0
]Y+Y DQ A55[ LYA MS[ DY
RILIlT101Y IMODIDI I
I I
MPI 2112 ASV NU
N[VQ
10
O 1N91: 1655
P/T ISSI ert eIQ1Q ert VlVY
0
sII.69/M. %.IpW/W. %.W/hf.
lel Lrvr�ty •<rd euWeltP !m smr hlp-vn 1nelWad In 1ete1 evWr1W yemnl aplemt.
93T%a IaY19J0
awanm a lema\rso oounea na e
� m
soma
svrvoreoom
1
� xn
m u m
\ax sure am un sort lea
�p 1 amsslma avvore 1
ssw sm
m ace u m orn¢ sa rsa u ry aau.
n A A i 39
van annol\ea o9ucna r9rnma aaens\s vrnuat vermmrrmu
H m ear x ra mm rxi aoan rw. oaa rxi e\acoi rxi leeesa
1 S 1 I
as ua 9m xss
� Im elm xw om nm my vm nm sw
J 9 0
saJ sou sosJ
Sy oen xrwr von rarmr
an Jea
ou m SIN,,
9 �
wo race rza va ma 9rm
J
ae asJ\ Je\ meJ\ Jsn
A�
9 �
s
om Sml n mn 9rd n
r e
A62, 31V9 3f6L JD9
al➢6p
11
� aslo J9a
uamn
1
%60 J031
InD w
nb 6 W3
'° a IeaYnf alm
19 J
ffi1r lU as9r bU
avn ova nl
� 1
mx as
om IItr J vaio rza l
6
ML Ax A59\ Px
a Jw
" msa xn
elm as m as99 as w
x
aslc vrre asx 9496
uauns
a
also au
w u
to aramw urvv9w
a a Ase o 0
� ass\ �r asss mJ
wr m\a
r mm
N9a 16ss 2Nn I 1655 319n 1653
.1 I I I I , I PRONm 1BR?19JD I
TECKKICAL SERVICES Phu 5
89
D].RECNR OP
TEa sERYICFs
1
6as7
2 1
CLERICAL IF!
fi
.
47
A
CORDS CLR
1
P 2020
RECORDS CLEM
0
1059 1835
CLERK
0
10.17/hr.
13 33 34
ODMIANCE LAEOM?MY SOURCE CONTROL
CtlIPLIINC1 MANAGER LAB MANAGER SOURCE C0111ROL MGA
1
5540 5288 5540
SEE PAGE SA FOR DMIl SEE PAGE 5B FOR DETAIL SEE PAGE SC FOR DETAIL
PPI6t6m lees-lsso
OEamut surlm eEa v
overml ae
0Eu sums
w 1
wsr
z x
w P.EdM.� P.E06E 6
LABWAfOn COV6fPV. 6[101. CI311[2 600Ra COMPRQ.
rE PEE SB FOR OET6Il SEE PEOE 6 PfA DEi61L SEE PE[6 N OfT66 SPE PEE SC PW OET6LL
N@LIARE
w IJ
OMlLIIMa 1011G®
1
5540
w
P 6 P
`" wum ssmEElrcE lu>ME sauce EIP OOEcm a6xluE
cwEz6la sseve mvfiva s0eu ENGIMu
<sn <sa Or
w Pu Plea M ISmc PILP
0 1
J 4 19P6
z
LNnEPLCn FNlIP 6Pft n
P 106E P966 106& 3985
P MI
0
n610 Z 60
R YECW06 aw
1
lw EE
EECR➢5 aw
0
IM IM
MW
0
r $I0.17/hr.
VW .INS-ISN
r RfIM[AL S[PVla3 PWl SL
LMSLO S/E/N
N
DllC W
IWI sull S
� 1
N51
1) 1 3 N
coala P. LLNC i
cwLIAMa a«suv. A4m1. anlcLL Mows cmrrtroL
LEL PWL SA aY OLTAM1 SFL eW[C PU'JaA1L 5[F IW[)PG DETAIL SC[PW[Y M LCTAIL
r
LMCU 1
v
w My ILVI
I $me
r ASTI W IVYWu
a
Lvs
,r 3 I 16 6
%PA IGM L LFVIM IMRaII"CCMM LO6AW OMI M IYa I=Y/V1Rp414t
�V
I
5U%R EMOU"Y OM Lu,)m"I NPW
ti isn un On
MkVWWU U MDWYW MIM w aU
1 11
ll)1 n) 31P1 llil
AL SP W HILL MWAMAL1
31)5 1MA )115 ION 31i5
W au III II WNIL III WAMLL III33N) N11 us uW n w NLL l]
3 n50IW WWI
550 10N 3550 IOW 1 EN
� w MamnW
a
1059E 3%s
N sioio aW
105P 316))
XOJG
O
flo.fsT..
ert rsslnAMt
As 6
eraom Irer.19L
1WOIIrLL MIrD rl4 Y
N
gRIT!q
� Rq f4 lgt
1 N51
U 1 1 ]I
rrGNl.r eqa i
mV1.lY4 ®rRV. 140. OEIICLL LIMiNgI
r m riY v rm aein s¢rw s rm mm rm Na s rm an¢ sa e]q v rm otnu
saga mlia
N
YaMr axIM.IW
t
5510
a e ]
Inannmr ewms sernu 1NrtfB
.. Iwllm
1 a511
�' imanrz tAl® NAIINi r]cma iNvan rsnm
1 1 1
»]e ms me
sma grlva swa
1 NN
sr uY uu
r
%N
atr p3 NSr a�
$ 1
'd ll5l 1)51
Laa l Y llSP
Y ]
la4a ]]61
� IV➢6]II
9
la% ZAS
� IVllI5P1
1
Ia6N II95
O HQe6 ODf
1
s IDSy �
1VA91
laNa Ir16 aaQ6 ClIr
5
Iqe 1!R
a Oa
a
yy rrt iYlsrur
r
p.ee/r.
ramsw xs- sw
amua ouaPumre rue c
sa
DIP[[M OI
amnia
1
Ns>
6 30 w
Rl}ttle PLAIWb4 i DGiIBI GMpeclltll MM
' araano an vaa u ra atan
aassu
sal
s j s s
'� sows ma amps mmmoR setnae exa
se amu
t
alllf!] alae[P
s
w asa
am' natru a
assocurz aawnarz
s
001 M
mw —
t ma
a Aran
ASSWun
tan sna
nst atmn
vsl a Pssac xu—n
r araa rz
tas auc t 1
t law Nat
laa mws
•
s+`AIDE m
t
IDa][ Nas
r
mMn
1
laa an
saanur t
1
Iowa wl lEP altt t
� la9 NN
u a1M 6In
_ la) no
I,rm W
1MV ww
flue
I
j10.tt/4.
n ast
1
PtlD4'9190f19M
r iX1RGpl KIMTDI! PWE N
A
DID[(lO�p'
MIG[GIP4
� 1
un
MIOL MOD6 i D61a NKRVLTIYI MQ
PY[6 M MxnL 5¢PWE 6 PLL DlTi6 OEllfgn4
MVBFB
1
SXI
nY
ID 6 6 I 6
MYP 11 CLL SYnF16 LOtli iDPtiNT 9 m PPN 1W Il
Y Y OE®
1 SMl
OI6OFY mmo FWliFl11 p4PFG
3 1
4511 45 62l 4SV
fll➢I[llLL ftwvLL ASIO[ pGP
NS}16P CWSI 3W 1
x ni
mi ]ni
v tttlT>ffi a 06i 014 SR CUI1 MSi
x x
ICNC Ylt 1D66[ mil 1066f Y11
m6l 1!@ Rin II@ [PoSl PISP
l x i
1061P n'Jf IDW ]M IMIF ]]R
Gli iYF III
Pl MIST nlP x
i4P W6T n.@ 1/11 IKE 3H5
D PIP.W h.
r 1061B IBIS
ml Imc n
x
xos
r Od 0Q(D
IDS9 NIH
PR usl
t
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
JOINT WORKS
OPERATING BUDGETS
P A klATION
litan dO Org ,s 'p
T
0
O sauce 1954
q�NGE COON
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
[ [ [ [ [ [ [. [ [ I [ [ I [
1lMW i41N!OF]AT.V fICD BntET WFaI1F
LII/x
sumac M Isunm/wumlm n.wmnm emir ALmIpB011S ex.lnwx
GI lo) _ IQ (0) (0)
tmau
Ohm lM brie Imuu4u rWl
IM•tl IMM 4 IIW ielmevl P�Ntl Ipr M
tt MOM
f®IalsW
ba.t Ysm{In FawIW 'v..r Ivafa/I'anup)
1. IYt MIWa.Wr\ MI.M.YY ja.19.M \ xl.ml a.011.RO a.m.. {a{[t to wlnble 41n4t bnl It m x{el Wall"AmMW
Yvrin pntlmnt It MHtlial WltlW nil M gwtl In ar tM yu
~IY m...I—f4nmry Mill,.ntlHtla.WMIN
<p11.11 tabll"Hf W aW Qwit,a1mHA 41Pnt W
airy.ala mf Wnln ryHaV IMIMIA fw 40wn..pv mnWl
W aasll mnW nation'nail.
-lY4x 4leynnt IMI 4 N mill
-IM-x MII4nt nyaa bI MAn pHm111 l.Wn a b aM
non IMin1m a!OL
...21 ma mnV'I tlialnl O.M.YO 1.M.m] a).mJ IT.OD \x.m' tMlnl f Nrmfbluon Af Imrul(ee[rua
m pl n
mlMa i<a0.0A 14y
Mm W W Jv mn r<n x eel ra 0011 mnnl.
o.l,.m Or In. Imr<n
ua n avlw a.ft<aslo-..
Will<Y6 TM.m iwuW.fas 1. W Wlll.I
(mlw g0a16) -1 of wlmmi. IMMI M,.m
W m VmC Ilnr to mN't AbAn
n1f16 MIIGq a.a m VYIYIt'Imt.
gaAa M416 <M.Oma W4 nf4tlMn.
euwf W.H. <W.W, Wrtmlf mlfleu In a'..M(im
MI.
F.W.mlalb MI.x' Im..W"i.1/Mrlalw.rw
aims MIa.1 M W IIr W.b.m..
11u.I.f m111b.1.
Nlian x ono uf4 1M4fa n nu I—es.
.a M
!. N.ranaul\ranbut I.Iv.mo I.Btl.lm VG.MI a.M M.am -IW m1n<t fa w W t M plm.
SWI.0
\. blla R-1!.1st—i <.M.M s.M.mo M.mo lm.M I.M.M -1 ..0 m 1.11,tlgtA..
-Ionia to disposal mlts fw print.IaWalq.m eMm H.mutt
a 1.mWMlw.CliM'MaM.1G Ba.
s. salMat mupr lx.m' elp.m' m.m' 10.00' -Imra In M a!rp 4lpavt.
e. Win/wlelaml sJm.aa l.ns.ma IS.. nl.m' M.me -Fair M Nall w1.W rpin m Milli W ygntl
1wIW/9gllr fallllln W Ml am WY.141PW-
). Orurtn a IYn11MA i.im.'a 3.M.M <la.tli> tM.mw Maa Gu b tmar H ryaulGllltla Ion ov�WIA
0M[l.fuomVien• .mn. f�lIW HIem Hll lrc.ya.
e. mllltw e.m.m' /.M.mo IDI.OD m1.M I.Htm -Immu Gw m elm.f mra eMA 1.Aa�r an 1em1A W1oC W
Wnlmml .omer.W tm.4e rnlllnr.
s. am w orl.M. Sinn :.bs.mo x.W.bw ml.. ]x.tla sv.m. -Im..0 m a.pn 11.lmx.M 41{st tlXt14.
. -b rmmm ra p0 pu.ltln W<l llttA I..
10. TM,J.1.m lrul, W.M.. W.M1.M a.M.. a.... a.M...
Im"M
it. l..M.1. iMn. iW at.
• te. Xn bmt mr.nA aB.m.W la.vt.M a.a..M M.M.M a....
mmw.r
[ [ l [ L [ [ [ [ [ t t [ [ [ [ l [ l
SCHEDULE I
JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY 5/11189
COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITURES & ESTIMATED CARRY-OVER
FISCAL YEAR 1989-90
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)
Budget Recommended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est'd Carry-Over
1988-89 Budget or 1987-88 Expenditures or to Fiscal
1989-90 Decrease 1988-89 Decrease Year 1989-90
1. Net Salaries, Wages &
Benefits $15,685,000 $17,687,000 $2,002,000 $12,829,800 $13,694,000 $ 864,200 $1,991,000
2. Odor Control & Chemical
Coagulants 5,189,000 5,687,000 498,000 4,243,100 5,006,000 762,900 183,000
3. Professional & Contract
Services 5,551,000 7,350,000 1,799,000 3,638,900 5,369,000 1,730,100 182,000
4. Equipment Charges 190,000 200,000 10,000 169,500 193,000 23,500 <3,000>
5. Repair & Maintenance
Materials & Services 3,165,000 3,765,000 600,000 2,879,000 3,215,000 336,000 <50,000>
6. Research & Monitoring 2,202,000 2,070,000 <132,000 1,943,900 2,188,000 244,100 14,000
7. Utilities 6,056,000 7,220,000 1,164,000 4,421,800 4,825,000 403,200 1,231,000
8. Other Materials, Supplies
& Outside Services 2,049,000 2,602,000 553,000 2,218,600 2,135,000 <83 600> <86 000>
9. Total Joint Operating
Expenses $40,087,000 $46,581,000 $6,494,000 $32,344,600 $36,625,000 $4,280,400 $3,462,000
10. Revenue and Offsets 1,200,000 2,050,000 850,000 1,771,600 2,091 000 319,400 <891 000>
11. Net Joint Operating $38 887 000 $44,531,000 $5,644,000 1 $30 573.000 $34 534,000 $3,961 000 $4,353,000
Schedule II
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 5/24/89
JOINT OPERATING FUND
Fiscal Year 1989-90
ALLOCATION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES
A 8 C D E F G H I J
GALLONAGE WS -9 60ING I 1 88-89 LUMPARASON
1988-W Estimated Estimated
District Flows Estimated 1989-90 Percent District Estimated Required District Required
No. Past .Year Increase Flows of Total Contribution Carryover Funding Contribution Funding
1 9,083.33 MG 116.67 9,200.00 MG 9.19% $4,092,000 $ 400,000 $ 3,692,000 $ 4,223,000 $ 3,846,000
2 30,570.76 1,431.52 32,002.28 31.96 14,232,000 1,391,000 12,841,000 11,468,000 10,445,000
3 31,189.25 642.40 31,831.65 31.79 14,157,000 1,384,000 12,773,000 12,265,000 11,170,000
5 4,509.53 50.11 4,559.64 4.55 2,026,000 198,000 1,828,000 2,104,000 1,916,000
6 5,390.66 430.43 5,821.09 5.81 2,587,000 253,000 2,334,000 2,050,000 1,867,000
7 7,498.25 687.21 8,185.46 8.17 3,638,000 356,000 3,282,000 2,749,000 2,504,000
11 6,676.47 458.80 7,135.27 7.13 3,175,000 310,000 2,865,000 3,239,000 2,950,000
13 171.55 131.40 302.95 0.30 134,000 13,000 121,000 58,000 53,000
14 2,003.85 <903.85> 1,100.00 1.10 490,000 48,000 442,000 731,000 666,000
TOTALS 97 093.65 MG 3,044.69 MG 100,138.34 M 100.00% $44 531 000 $4,353,000 $40,178 000 $38 887 000 $35 417 000
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III
JOINT OPERATING 6 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5117/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
1966-87 1987-88 1988-89 1988-F 1989-90
ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND
1. SALARIES 6 WAGES 11,191,376 13,149,700 %739,000 16,258,000 18,530,000 la)
2. RETIREMENT 1,888,014 2,191,366 1,983,000 2,938,000 3,384,000 la)
3. WORKERS COMP 120,000 186,000 134,DD0 134,000. 155,000 (a)
4, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 19,237 15,855 51000 25,000 25,000 (a)
5. GROUP INSURANCE 899,901 1,276,752 1,198,000 1,353,000 1,509,000 (a)
6. UNIFORM RENTAL 47,267 51,497 73,ODO 57,000 84,000 (a)
7. TOTAL BENEFITS 2,974,419 3,721,470 3,393,000 4,507,000 5,157,CCO la;
8. SALARIES, WAGES, 6 BENEFITS 14,165,795 16,671,170 18,132,000 20,765,000 23,687,000
9. DIRECT CHARGES-CORF/DIST 11,828,505) (2,249,960) (2,578,000) (2,850,000) (3,500,000)
10. COST ALLOC-CORF/DIST (1,329,824) (1,791,523) (1,860,0001 (2,230,000) (2,500,000)
11. W.O. SALARIES 8 BENEFITS (3,158,3291 (4,041,493) (4,436,000) (5,080,000) (6,000,000) (6)
12. NET J.O. PAYROLL 11,007,466 12,829,687 13,694,000 15,685,000 17,687,000 (c)
13. MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES
14. GASOLIME, DIESEL 6 OIL 207,501 203,102 215,000 265,ODD 250,C00 (d)
15. INSURANCE 589,666 857,352 553,000 646,DO0 600,000 (e)
16. MEMBERSHIPS 16,484 14,742 18,➢➢0 25,000 30,000 (f)
17. OFFICE EXPENSE
18. SUPPLIES 64,144 96,082 84,000 110,000 110,000 (g)
19. OTHER 43,635 49,510 50,000 55,ODD 55,000 (9)
20. OPERATING SUPPLIES
21. CHLORINE 6 ODOR CONTROL 1,457,451 1,804,810 1,900,000 211001000 211001000 (6)
22. SULFIDE CONTROL 622,020 605,154 850,000 850,000 1,C00,D00 (6)
23. CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 974,948 1,833,150 2,256,000 2,239,CDO 2,587,000 (i)
24. LAB CHEMICALS 6 SUPPLIES 55,788 63,529 130.000 100,000 140,000 (j)
25. TOOLS 49,716 75,943 BO,ODO 85,000 85,000 (j)
26. SOLVENTS, PAINTS, 6 JAN. SUPPLIES 145,923 94,562 100,000 150,000 150,000 (j)
27. OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 238,019 198,576 136,000 286,000 200,000 (j)
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III
JOINT OPERATING 8 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5/17/89
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
r
1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90
ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND
r
28. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
.+ 29. GROUMEEPING 27,498 42,975 43,000 67,000 100,000 (k)
30. OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES. 62,320 95,903 125,000 150,000 400,000 (k)
r 31. SOLIDS REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL 2,Z81,199 2,767,538 4,351,COO 4,400,000 5,5GO,ODO (k) -
32. OTHER WASTE DISPOSAL 72,737 25,910 1531000 174,000 185,000 (k)
r
33. OTHER 209,008 240,114 250,C00 255,000 635,000 (k)
r 34. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
35. LEGAL 160,711 267,486 250,000 250,000 Z75,000 (1)
36. AUDIT 8 ACCOUNTING 21,548 19,978 251000 25,000 25,000 (1)
37. ENGINEERING 52,373 39,201 101D00 501000 50,000 (1)
r
38. OTHER 80,039 439,833 1621000 180,000 180,000 (1)
r 39. PRINTING 8 PUBLICATION
40. REPRO-IN-HOUSE 61,508 76,543 82,000 90,000 100,000 (m)
41. PRINTING-OUTSIDE 40,437 49,214 30,0m 59,009 50,000 (m)
42. PHOTO PROCESSING 13,222 19,773 151000 15,000 20,000 (m)
r
43. NOTICES 8 ADS 30,079 26,243 50,090 59,000 75,DO0 (m)
44. RENTS 6 LEASES
45. OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 46,132 68,645 78,000 70,000 100,000 (n)
46. DISTRICT EGUIPMENT RENTAL 86,930 105,864 115,000 120,ODD 100,0W (n)
47. REPAIRS 8 MAINTENANCE
48. MATERIALS 2,174,676 2,755,442 3,100,000 3,000,GO0 3,600,000 (o)
r 49. CONTRACTS 99,923 123,602 115,000 165,000 165,000 (m)
50. RESEARCH 8 MONITORING
51. OCEAN MONITORING 1,386,889 1,759,596 1,977,000 1,990,000 1,700,000 Ip)
52. OCEAN/I.W./OPER RESEARCH 2O7,649 184,303 211,000 212,000 370,000 (p)
r
53. TRAINING, MEETINGS, 8 TRAVEL 53,544 58,854 981000 100,000 125,000 (q)
r
r
JOINT MORNS OPERATING BUM SCHEDULE III
JOINT OPERATING 6 WORMING CAPITAL FUOIS 5/17169
r 1989-W FISCAL YEAR
1986-81 1987-68 1988-89 1998-89 1989-90
ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND
r
54. UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS Ila a a 21000 2,000 (rl
r 55. UTILITIES
Cr 56. DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 159,106 116,2T0 90,0D 250,030 200,O00 (s)
57. PO4ER 4,214,281 3,993,300 4,420,E 5,300,E 6,500,600 (s)
58. NATURAL GAS 351,019 113,916 120,000 316,00 250,000 (5)
59. TE-EPHOL 81,227 105,982 105,000 951000 120,E (s)
r
60. WATER 66,219 92,332 90,O0 95,E 150,000 (s)
r 61. OTHER EXPENSES
- 62. FREIGHT 23,917 35,491 35,000 301000 40,000 (t)
63. GENERAL 158,739 221,745 200,800 200,am 225,COO (t)
64. RON OPERATING FEES 0 a 201000 0 250,000 (t)
65. PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 531884 15,546 203,000 50,000 50,000 (u)
66. OTHER NON-OPERATING EXPENSE 191059 41,805 36,ODO 40,Bb0 45,000 (v)
_ 67, TOTAL MAX, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES 16,761,286 19,514,916 22,931,000 24,702,000 28,894,000
r 68. COST ALLOCATION-CORF 8 OTHER (160,564) (289,277) (300,000) (300,000) (350,00(1) (a)
69. NET J.O. MAT'L, SUPPLIES, 8 SER9 16,600,722 19,225,639 22,631,000 24,402,E 28,544,000 (x)
r
70. REVENUE f1,392,542I (1,482,319) (1,791,000) (1,200,000) 11,700,O001 lyl
71. !ET J.O. EXPENDITURES 26,215,646 30,573,007 34,534,E 36,887,001) 44,531,00 (z)
r
r
r
r
r
r
SCHEDULE IV
5/11/89
REV. 5/19/89
NOTES TO JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR
r
_ (a) Salaries, Wa es and Benefits - See attached Schedule V for 1989-90 salaries
r and benefits est mates and projected payroll savings.
Estimated 1988-89 salaries and benefits are below budget primarily because
delayed construction schedules allowed positions to remain vacant. For
r one-half of the year the Retirement Board reduced the required Districts
contribution by 50%, but the reduction is not expected to last into
1989-90.
(b) Cost Allocations and Direct Char ebacks to CORF and Individual Districts -
Represents direct labor and benefits chargebacks and cost allocation to the
appropriate fund for which the work is actually performed (CORF for work on
treatment plants' capital expansion; respective Capital Facilities funds
_ for work on individual District's collection facilities capital expansion;
and Operating funds for maintenance and repair). Also reflects administra-
tive time chargeable to self-funded insurance programs; and Source Control
Division and Laboratory Division charges to respective Districts for
industrial waste monitoring and enforcement program.
" (c) Net J�O Payroll - This line item represents the net salaries, wages and
enefib is chargeable to Joint Operating Fund for administration and
maintenance/operation of the Joint works facilities, after chargebacks to
�+ other funds for services performed by the labor pool described above in (b).
- - (d) Gasoline, Oil and Fuel - This account Includes gasoline, oil and diesel
fuel required to operate stationary treatment plant equipment as well as
. approximately 300 pieces of major mobile equipment such as vehicles,
cranes, etc.
(e) Insurance - Includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee
fidelity bond, all-risk (earthquake and flood) policy, fire, boiler and
machinery policies. The major elements of this account are $323,000 for
r $35 million in coverage provided by the comprehensive all-risk policy and
$258,000 for in-lieu premiums to increase the reserve levels in the
self-insured public liability fund pursuant to the Boards' decision to
r, fully self-insure liability risk.
(f) Memberships - Districts' memberships in Association of Metropolitan
Sewerage Agencies (AMSA), California Association of Sanitation Agencies
(CASA), Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) , and Long Beach
Safety Council. Current year expenses and 1989-90 appropriations include a
_fee for membership in AMSA's Conference of Coastal Agencies (CCA), which
r works specifically on legislative and regulatory matters relative to ocean
disposal issues.
r (g) Office Expense - This account includes supplies, forms, small office
equ pme�fting materials and postage for all departments.
r
u
Page Two SCHEDULE IV I �
V
I
(h) Chlorine 8 Odor Control Chemicals - The Districts presently use chlorine,
and sodium hydroxide caustic soda) as primary odor control chemicals in
the treatment plants. Usage of chlorine is expected to decrease by
$440,000 during the year as the clarifier covers and foul air scrubbers
are placed into service. Caustic soda use in the foul air scrubbers at
both plants however, is expected to increase over 300% as new scrubbers are I �
placed into service. Caustic soda is also added to trunklines to control
hydrogen sulfide in the lines, and $285,000 has been added to the chemical hw
budget for the Joint Works' share of this expense.
Ferrous chloride use, required to control hydrogen sulfide levels in our
digester gas as required by AQMD Rule 431.1, will decrease by $85,000,
partially as a result of increased ferric chloride for physical/chemical
treatment.
During the course of this year, we expect to optimize use of the various
odor control chemicals, but expect our overall usage levels and budget
requirements to remain high as we maintain compliance with increasingly
stringent air quality regulations and bring 20 additional foul air
scrubbers on line. I !
(i) Chemical Coa ulants - We expect that the polymer usage level increase in L
198 -90 will be partially offset by lower unit prices resulting in a net
increase of $91,000 for the material. Polymer is added to the influent u
wastewater along with ferric chloride via the physical/chemical treatment
systems at both plants to improve solids removal efficiencies in the
primary clarifier basins. It is also added to digested sludge prior to V
dewatering to cause the sludge to coagulate to improve the sludge and water
separation process.
Ferric chloride is used as a backup chemical in the event the primary L
chemical distribution systems are out of service for repairs or
maintenance, but primarily for enhanced primary physical/chemical clarifier
performance. Physical/chemical treatment systems will be fully installed
and operational at both plants this year, and we expect to increase our use
of ferric chloride in these systems by $262,000 to control hydrogen sulfide
emissions and improve solids removal efficiencies in the primary basins. L
(,)) Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as scrubber acids, y
activa a car on, solvents, cleaners, hardware, janitorial supplies, tools, L
laboratory supplies, etc. required to operate and maintain existing and
expanding facilities.
(k) Contractual Services - The major component of this category is sludge L1
removal and disposal . Contracts have been executed with Recyc Inc. , Pima
Gro and Curti Enterprise for agricultural reuse of residual solids. The
Coyote Canyon landfill is capable of accepting less and less solids as its
ultimate closure approaches, the Coyote tipping fee will increase 50% on Lr
July 1, 1989 and no replacement site has yet been approved within the
county. A total of $5.5 million has been budgeted for solids removal and ' ,
disposal . L
I
it
r
r Page Three SCHEDULE IV
" This account also includes appropriations for groundskeeping services,
toxics removal services, outside laboratory services, trash pickup, plant
site sweeping, data processing system maintenance and support services, and
.. temporary help to level out periodic increases in staff workload and
staffing levels. A maintenance and operations contract is anticipated in
-- the next year for the Plant 2 oxygen generation plant and $400,000 has been
budgeted for that service contract.
-- (1) Professional Services - Includes General Counsel , special labor counsel ,
CPA audit and miscellaneous accounting, data processing, engineering and
other consulting services.
(m) Printing and Publications - Budget allows for in-house and outside
r reproduction costs and reflects expanded management information system and
increasingly complex administrative requirements, as well as continuing
- demand by public and regulatory agencies for information on Districts'
activities. The continuing efforts of our Public Information Officer (PIO)
to improve our public education program on Districts' activities is also
. . reflected in the increased budget for this line item.
.+ (n) Rents and Leases - This account includes cost accounting system charges to
e Jo nt Operating Fund for Districts-owned equipment, and outside
equipment rental for major equipment used for emergency repairs. The
_ 1989-90 allocation has been increased slightly to reflect the increased
usage levels of large equipment required over the past four years to
support major repairs and maintenance in our upgraded and expanded
facilities.
., (o) Repairs and Maintenance - This item, which is for parts and services for
repair of plant facilities, reflects an authorization to allow for routine
., equipment maintenance. Should this increased allocation prove to be
Insufficient in the event of major unexpected equipment failures and/or
- repairs, a transfer from the unappropriated reserves of the individual
r Districts would be necessary to meet the increased obligation.
(p) Research and Monitoring - $1,600,000 in this account is for contract
services to carry out the extensive ocean monitoring program required by
�+ EPA Region IX under the provisions of the Districts' NPDES permit, which
_ became effective April 1, 1985. This budget decrease does not reflect a
reduced effort or program, but a reallocation of specific projects to
Districts' staff. The account also includes the Districts' contribution to
the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) being
conducted under a Joint powers agreement with other Southern California
municipal dischargers, and also provides for some operational research and
" evaluation to develop optimum operating parameters in the treatment plants.
(q) Training, Meetings and Travel - Expanding activities of regulatory
.+ agencies have required increased Board member and staff travel in recent
years. It is expected that considerable travel will continue to be
- required in connection with our continued efforts to obtain an extension of
.. our NPDES permit conditions. Also includes ongoing technical training and
r
Page Four SCHEDULE IVY
l
u
materials for staff, expansion of our supervisory training program to help
provide supervisors with the necessary training to more effectively manage
their Divisional groups, and required training for new computerized control L
systems and other "high tech" equipment.
(r) Uncollectible Accounts - For miscellaneous accounts that are determined by
the General Counsel and Director of Finance to be uncollectible.
(s) Utilities - The $6.5 million allocation for purchased power in this item � j
reflects a $1.2 million increase over 1988-89 budgeted levels due to L
anticipated completion of additional air scrubbers and electric motors at
the new Ocean Outfall Booster Station. II
(t) Other Operating Expenses - Expenses not chargeable elsewhere, such as L
freight and miscellaneous items, and annual permit renewal fees and
penalties assessed by the SCAQMD. L
(u) Ex enses A lica%l to Prior Years - Represents adjustments to an operating
or non-operating account balance Trom previous years. II
YY
(v) Other Non�-0-Operating Expenses - Miscellaneous items not chargeable
elsew erTi e.
(w) Cost Allocation and Direct Chargebacks to CORF and Individual Districts -
For materials, supplies and services cost allocation and chargebacks for
same purposes as described above under (b). I �
(x) Net JO Materials, Supplies and Services - This line item represents the net J�
materials, supplies and services chargeable to the Joint Operating Fund for li
administration and maintenance and operation of the Joint Works Facilities,
after chargebacks to other funds.
(y) Net Revenues - Budget amount is for sales of various sewage treatment Lr
process by-products, revenues from the wastehauler disposal facilities at L+
Plant No. 1, sampling chargebacks to individual Districts, and miscellaneous
items. U
(z) Net JO Requirements - This line item represents the net Joint Operating L1
Requirements after reduction of the Total Joint Operating Requirements by
the revenues generated from sale of by-products, charges to other agencies,
and other miscellaneous operating revenues.
L
IL1
L
64
'
JOINT OPERATING FUND SCHEDULE V
(AND WORKING CAPITAL REVOLVING FUND) 5/11/89
PROJECTED SALARIES & BENEFITS
1989-90
_ Anticipated
At Full Payroll Recommended
,. Em to ent Savings Budget
SALARIES & WAGES 20,820,000 2,290,000 18,530,000 1
BENEFITS:
1. Retirement 3,801,000 417,000 3,384,000 (2a
2. Workers' Compensation 155,000 -0- 155,000 (2b
3. Unemployment Insurance 25,000 -0- 25,000 (2c
- 4. Group Medical
- Self-Funded (includes 1,359,000 135,000 1,224,000 (2d
's transfers)
- _ - HMO 264,000 24,000 240,000
- Life 51,000 6,000 45,000
5. Uniforms 94,000 10,000 84,000 (2e
6. Total Benefits 5,749,000 592,000 5,157,000
- TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND BENEFITS 26,569,000 2,882.000 23.687.000
NOTES:
r
1) Salaries & Wa ees�s - Full employment projection based on the assumption that all 537
author zed permanent positions and the 44 Summer Work Program positions are filled as set
forth in the personnel recommendations. Because of our ability to sometimes temporarily
' minimize staffing by adjusting plant operational modes, personnel turnover and strict
controls on filling vacancies, we have targeted our payroll cost at $23.7 million next
year (13.5% over the 1988-89 budget) which will realize a payroll savings of $2,882,000.
If, however, turnover and vacancies are lower, it may be necessary to allocate additional
funds from the unappropriated reserve accounts of the individual Districts.
2) Benefits - Remarks above under Salaries and Wages regarding full employment of
authorized positions also apply to benefits.
(a) Retirement - The Districts' employees are members of the Orange County Employees
°' Retireme�tem pursuant to our MOU's.
W
SCHEDULE V
Page Two
5/11/89 v
(b) Workers' Compensation - Amount includes total estimated expenditures for the y
workers' compensation program set forth in detail in the enclosed Workers'
Compensation Self-Insured Fund Budget on Schedule VI. An appropriation of $155,000
is recommended for 1989-90 to maintain the current level of accumulated reserves as
recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee.
(c) Unemployment Insurance - Because of reserves credited to our account in the
State Unemployment Insurance Fund, only $25,000 in contributions were required for
the last year. We anticipate making similar contributions in 1989-90. ai
(d) Group ca Medil - Includes the Districts' share of employee medical plan benefits
for the prepaid HMO plans, the estimated total costs of the self-funded indemnity
plan and the life insurance premiums. Schedule VII details the expected costs of
the self-funded plan and the second of three annual increased employee contributions
included in current MOUs. The recommended budget increase reflects our increased
staffing level.
(e) Uniforms - This budget projection is in accordance with employee MOU's. We have i
again been able to obtain favorable bids for uniform rental , and the unit costs of ,r
uniform service have not increased for several years.
I "
Y.I
Y,1
I :
r
Ir
v
Y�
I '
r
y
j '
YJ
v
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET
WORKERS' COMPENSATION SELF-INSURED FUND SCHEDULE VI
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR 5/03189
1988-89 1999-30
1988-89 ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED
EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET
............................................................
1. Salaries. Wages and Benefits 15,000 14,532 16,000
2. Benefits/Claims 100,000 100.000 110,000
S. Contractual Services 12,000 12,024 13,000
4. Legal Services 5,000 0 5,000
5. Professional Services 17,000 22,788 25,000
6. Supplies 6 Other 1,000 0 1,000
7. Sub-Total 150,000 149,344 170,000
8. Excess Loss Policy 40,000 30,285 40,000
9. Total Expenditures 190.000 179,629 210,000
REVENUES 6 RESERVES
10. In-Lieu Premiums 134,000 134,000 155,000
It. Interest 6 Miscellaneous 56.000 59,912 55,000
12. Total Revenues 190,000 193,912 210,000
12. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 0 14,283 0
13. Reserves and Transfers 708,000 685,069 699,000
14. Ending Reserves 708,000 699,352 699,000
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET
SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN TRUST FUND SCHEDULE VII
19B9-90 FISCAL YEAR 5112189
19B8.89 1989-90 1989.90
-- I988-89 ESTIMATED AT FULL PAYROLL RECOMMENDED
_ EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES EMPLOYMENT SAVINGS BUDGET
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
1. Claims - Medical 926,000 745,980 1.045,000 (105,000) 940,000
2. - Disability 11,000 45,753 31,000 (3,000) 2B4O00
S. - Long Ten Disability 0 48,715 99,000 (9,000) 90,000
4. Dental 117,000 161,964 210,000 (21,000) IB9,000
5. Sub-Total 1,054,000 1,002,412 1,385,000 (138.000) 1,247,000
7. Contractual Services 47,000 37,714 47.000 (5,000) 42,000
6. Stop Loss Insurance 95,000 73,309 93,000 (9,000) 84,000
8. Total Expenditures 1,196,000 1,113,435 1,525,000 (152,D00) 1,373,000
REVENUES 6 RESERVES
9. In-Lieu Premiums From - CSDOC 790,000 640,690 1,112,000 (111,000) 1,001,000
. Employee 135,000 118,324 171,000 (17,000) 154,000
10. Interest a Miscellaneous 0 17,952 0 0 0
11. Reimburse from Stop Loss Insurance 0 0 0 0 0
12. Total Revenue 925,000 776,966 1,283,000 (128,000) 1,155,000
13. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) (271,000) (336.469) (242,000) 24,000 (218.000)
14. Transfers 304,000 260,000 247,000 (24,000) 223,0DO
15. Beginning Reserves 198,000 231,665 198,000 155,000
16. Ending Reserves 231,000 155,196 203,000 0 160,000
JOINT WORTS OPERATING BUDGET
PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF-INSURED FUND SCHEDULE VIII
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR 5103189
1988-89 1989.90
1988.89 ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED
EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET
------------------------------------------------------------
1. Salaries, Wages and Benefits 1,000 0 1,000
2. Benefits/Claims 20,000 8,736 20,000
3. Contractual Services 8,000 4,522 8,000
4. Legal Services 15,000 40,000 25,000
S. Professional Services 1,000 0 1,000
6. Supplies B Other 1,000 0 1,000
7. Sub-Total 46,000 53,258 56,000
8. Excess Loss Policy 265,000
9. Total Expenditures 46,000 53.258 321,000
REVENUES 6 RESERVES
10. In-Lieu Premiums 258,000 258,000 258,000
It. Interest 6 Miscellaneous 75,000 123.272 120,000
12. Allocation to Other Funds 10.000 0 0
12. Total Revenues 343,000 381,272 370,000
12. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 297,000 328,014 57.000
13. Reserves and Transfers 1,255,000 1,320,373 1,648,000
14. Ending Reserves 1,552,000 1,648,387 1,705,000
_ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
_ JOINT WORKS CAPITAL OUTLAY
REVOLVING FUND
PNjlATION
+� 11 ,politan Or CIS,
J sA en S
c
U m ay U
U) = '<
p S'ace 195Q y
ggNGE COUNA
1989-1990 FISCAL YEAR
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
CORF A.\LS
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
SUM14ARY OF DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE A
AND COMPARISON TO LAST YEAR
1989-90 1989-90 1988-89
BUDGET COMPARABLE
DISTRICTI EQUITY BUDGET BEGINNING GRANT BUDGET
PERCENT REQUIREMENTS RESERVES FUNDS —REQUIREMENTS
1 10.44X 10,724.000 11.350,000 287,000 9.859,000 (a)
2 28.78% 29.564.000 45.815,000 790.000 27.354.000
3 31.26% 32.112,000 39,217,000 858.000 29,540,000
5 5.12% 5.260.000 1,856.000 140.000 4.967.000 (a)
6 4.83% 4.962.000 1.776.000 133.000 4.711,000 (a)
7 6.84% 7.026.000 16,471,000 188.000 6,126.000
11 6.91% 7,098.000 2.592.000 190,000 6,791,000 (a)
13 0.13% 134.000 3.100,000 3.000 95.000
14 5.69% 5.845,000 156.000 5.537.000 (b)
TOTAL 100.00% I 102.725.000 122.177,000 2.745.000 L 94.980.000
(a) Long-range financial projections indicate these Districts may need to issue debt in 1989-90
(b) Funds will be provided by required deposits form IRWD
CORFR9 ELLS CAPITAL OVIA7 REVOLVING NOD SCBEDULL 64 5'I1;B9 10:01 AN
SUNBURY 07 JOINT WORKS CGA57RVCTIOA RIDVIIENtNTS Page 1
1999-199D TO 1998-1996
A B C 0 L P G A I J I
RSTINATN I ISTINATLD II REQUIRED WINAT10 I ESTIMATED ESTIMATED 1 ISTINATRO FIVE ISTINATID TIN COST TO
PROJECT I C.I.P. II BODGE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUNIT 11 IRAN DUMB? HAS II CONPLIT9
TOTAL I 6130189 II 19H-90 I 1990-91 I 1991-12 I 19N-93 1 1993-94 II TOTAL I 199/-99 I TOTAL II PIOJICTS
..............I------------ I I............ 1------------ t............ I............ 1----------- I I------------ t............ ------------ I I -----------
I II I I I I II I I II
1. New and Rebudgeted Major Projects I I II I I
I II I I I I II I I II
A. Reclamation Plant 1 II II I II
1. Expansion to RD MID, PI-16-1 11,511,000 1 II 100,000 1 537.000 1 1,000,000 1 12,001,000 1 1,300,000 11 17,531,000 1 17,537,000 It
2. Ntadworks 90.2 1 Plant 10.1. PI-N/PI-11 19,455,000 1 15,455,000 11 4,000,000 1 1 II 1,000,000 1 4,500,001 It
3. Odor control facilities 1 11 1 1 II 1 11
a. covert for Primary Basins, P1-25 1,311,0001 1,281,000 11 100,0001 I II 100.000 1 I 111,001 II
I. Foul Air Scrubber Syntax, PI.26 2,101,DOD 1 2.201,000 II 200,000 1 I II 100,000 1 I 200,060 11
1. Entrances/SecuritT/Interior loads/Landscaping PI-27 3,561,0001 1,561,000 11 900100D 1 500,000 1 600400 1 1 2,000,000 1 1 21000,000 II
S. Prioary Clarifiers Nos. 6.15, PI-33 10,811,000 t 811,000 12,000,000 15,000,000 1 12,000,OOD I I,OD0,0001 II 40,000,000 1 1 /0,0001000 II
6. Digesters II-16 and Gas Kindling Systea, 71d4-1 18,760,000 E 205,000 12,000,000 13.555,0001 12,000,000 1 1,000,0001 II 31,555,000 1 I 31,555,000 II
7. Sludge Kindling Facilities, PI-34-2 22,500,000 1 100,000 It I0,000,DDD 1 10.000,000 1 2,100,000 1 1 22,400,001 1 I 22,140,000 11
R. Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 6 8, PI-35.1 2,553,000 1 243,000 II 2,250,000 1 100.000 1 1 1 If 2,350.000 1 1 2,351,000 II
9. Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 1 10, P1-33-2 1,500,000 1 11 1 1 2.000,000 I,SO0,000 1 I 3.500,000 1 1 315111011 11
10. Underground Tank Replaceaent At Plat 1, R-027-1 551,000 E 516,000 1 10,000 1 I I I 10,000 I 10,16011
11. Fuel System lnpmvemmts, R-D33-1 170,000 E 20,000 II 150,000 1 I II 150,000 I 150,000 [1
12, Central Air Compressor Station 230,ODD I 1 50,000 1 200,000 1 1 II 250,000 1 I 25D,000 II
13. Electrification Project 2.100,000 1 II 100,000 1 1,000,o0D 1 1.000,000 1 1 II 2,100.000 1 I 2,100,000 II
11. Primary Trauenl 36 MOD 16,250,000 I ID0,000 3,000,000 9.000,000 4,150,000 1 II 16,250,000 1 I 16,250,Doo II
15. Primary Treatment 36 ROD 16,250,000E I 1 II 1 16,250,000 1 16,250,00011
16. Belt Prena 11 Units) 11,10D,000I I 1,500,0001 6,400,0001 6,400,0001 II 14,300,0001 1 14,300,00011
17. Raw Sewage Emergency Bypass 1,592,000 I II 1 1 1 II 1 1,992,000 1 1,952,000 It
18. DAF's: 3 1 10' Diameter I,I60.000 1 100.000 1 1.500,000 1 1.500,000 1 760,000 1 11 4,160,000 1 1 4.160,000 It
59. Solids Storage 11 Bins) 10,117,000 1 I1 1 1 1 11 1 5,577,000 1 5,577,000 II 4,600,000
N. Standby Power Generation 7,115,000 1 11 1 1 1 2,300,000 1 5,435,000 11 7,735,000 1 1 7,735,004 11
21. Meoitmrlm9/Control System 5,070,0DO I 1,000.000 1 2.410,000 1 I,00,000 1 1 11 5,070,000 1 1 5,016,064 II
22. Digesters: 2 1 11D' Diameter 9,110,OOD I I 900,000 3,200,000 1 3,200,000 11 7,100,000 1 1,800,000 1 1,100,000 11
N. Remove 7rickliog Filters lu 1,100,000 I I 1,300,000 1 11 1.300,000 1 1 1,100,000 11
21. IN, Electrical Fewer Distribution 2.477,000 I II i I 800,000 11 800,000 1 1.671,000 1 2.177,00D 11
25. 40 DID Oxygen Activated Sludge 6 DAFE 61.461,000 1 I 11 1 655.000 1 655,000 11 64.501,000
H. misc. ProjectE 10,000,0001 II 1,000,0001 1.000,0001 1,000,000 1 1,000,0001 1,000,000 11 5,000,000 1 5,000,000 1 10,0ao,00011
...........1 ---------- ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I I ----------- ---------- ----------- 11 -----------
SDB-TOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANT 1 339,951,000 42,421,000 11 11,310,000 1 50,212,000 1 51,600,000 1 34,610,000 1 12,335,000 11 195,067,060 32,951,000 I 221,018,000 11 61d01,000
...........I .......... I I .......... I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I I ----------. 1 ---------- ----------- 11 -----------
CORB19 1.ILS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TURD SCMIDUII 0-1 5J17/119 10:01 MY
SUMMARY Of JOIXT FORKS M13IEOC1301 R!oull.!MIYTS Page 2
1919-1990 70 1991.1999
A B C 0 1 R G B I J I
[STIMATIO I ISTIME79D IIQUIRID I ISTIMATID I ISTIMATID I WIMATID I ISTIMATIO IIV6 I 6S13RAIRD 1 711 I MST 70
PROXY C.I.P. BUCG11 SUDGRT I BUDGET I BUDCIT I SWAP 11 FIAT I BUDGET I Text COMPLETI
TOTAL I 1f)0/19 II 1119-90 119D-91 1591-92 I I992-93 1991-51 II TOTAL 1994-99 1 TOTAL P10JE[Ts
-------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ I------------ I----------- ------------ 1------------ ------------ -----------
B. Treatment 11ant ! I I 1 II 1
1. Additional 105 Boot Digester 3,05,000 II I I II 21145,000 1 2,10,000 II 1,150,000
2. Dpmntt00s Building, Pi-2]-S-I 3,125,000 E II 500,000 1,800,000 825,000 I II 3,125.0001 3,125,00011
3. Upgrade Activated Sludge System, P2-50 L300,0001 II 100,000 1 1,000,000 1 4,000,0001 2,700,0001 It 71800,0001 I 71600,00011
4. Additional OAF 2,600,000 E 100,000 1,000,000 1 11000,000 1 500,000 1 I 2,600,000 1 2,600,000 11
S. Odor Central facilities II I I I I II I I II
a. Primary 1161os •A• thin Q. Covers, P2-12 5,511.000 E 5,064,000 11 450,000 1 1 II 450,0001 I 150,000 II
b. Foul Air ScruEbers system, P2-33 6.583,0001 61333,000 11 250,000 1 I II 250,0001 I 250,DDO 11
C. lapronnts to Grit facility B, Billings Falls] 1 11 1 I II I II
and Distribution structure A, P2-34 6.209,000 I 6,159,000 50,000 1 II 50,DM I 50,000 II
1, Landscape Rod Support Facilities I I I II I
i. Warehouse Building, P2-35-2 4,950,0001 11 500,000 1 21200,000 1 21250,000 1 II [,950,0001 I 41150,00011
b. Intimater Building , P2-35-3 1,200,DOo 1 II 100,000 1 2,500,0001 1,600,000 1 I II 4.200.0001 1 1,200,00611
c. Constructive Management Office, 12-35-4 11211,000 1 S00,000 1 700,000 1 16,000 1 I I 1,201,006 1 I I,H1,010 11
d. Phase 11 Site Rod Security Improvements, R-35.5 2,300,0001 100,000 1 11300.000 1 900,0001 I II 2,300,0051 I 2,IDo'lle II
7. Mile Modifos 6 Improvements to facilities, 12-37 7,162,000 1 4,862,000 It 2,100,000 1 11 I 2,300,000 1 I 2,300,006 11
1. Rehabilitation of Digesters I,J,[,4,M,Y 6 0, P2-39 1.171,000 178,000 11 31000,000 1 1,000,000 1 1 I 1 1'015,010 1 1 6,000,900 11
9. Process Control Computer Molitor Improvements, 12-10 270,000 20,000 It 250,000 1 1I II 250,100 1 I 2S0,000 II
10. Primary tratmat 24 IGD,R-41 11,300,0001 11 510,000 1 6,I00,DOD 1 1,4001000 1 1,000,0001 II 11,)OO,DDQ I I 11,301,060 II
11. 0mdergre0nd Tani leplacemenl, R-027-2 551,000 1 518,000 11 10,000 1 1 1 1 II 10,000 1 10,000 11
12. fuel System inproveents, 1-033-2 170.0001 20,00011 150.000 1 1 1 I II ISo,loO I 1 1S0,00011
1). Overflow Pulp Station 250,000 1 50,0001 200,000 1 I 250.000 1 1 250,00411
if. Electrification Project 6,500,000 2D0,000 1 1,000,0001 2,300,000 1 I 6,500,000 1 I 6,500,00011
15. Solids Storage: 2 Bans 5,200,000 E I 4DO,DDD I 2,400,000 2,100,000 E I 5,200.000 1 I 51200,000 11
16. Potable Water Distribution System 3.809,000E I 1 300,000 300,0001 3,509,000 3,809,000 11
17. Monitoringicoatrol System 5,330,000 II 30,000 600,000 1 3,700,000 1 1,000,000 1 11 5,330,000 1 1 5,330,100 II
16. Standby Plant Generation 9,200,000 1 1 I 1 91200,000 1 91200,000 11
19. Plant Voter Pump Station 1,170,000 II I I I I 11170,0001 1,170,00011
2D. RISC. Projects 10,000,000 II 1,000,D0o 1 1,000,0001 1.000,000 1 1,ODD,o00 1 1,000,00011 5,000,0001 5,000,0001 10,000,00011
...........I ---------- I ---------- I .......... I ---------- I -----.---- I ---------- I I ----------- I ---------- I ----------- it -----------
SUB-10TAL - TRIATAW PIAMT 2 111,561,000 1 23.104,000 11 16,419,00E 1 25,950,000 1 26,663,000 1 1.600.000 1 1.300,000 11 72,603,000 1 21,011,000 1 93,617,000 11 1,79,E00
........... .......... I ---------- I ---------- ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 11 ----------- I ---------- I ----------- 11 -----------
1
1 I 1 1 4 1 / 1 1 1 4 1 J 1 1 1 I / 1
CORTS9 I.ILS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE 8-1 5111119 10:01 AN
SUMMARY OF JOIN} VORIS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 1
19894990 TO 1990-1999
A B C 0 8 L
G B I J R
ISTIXA1ID ESTIMATED I RIQUIRID 8STIMAT80 89TIMATIO E ISTIMA}ID E ESTIMATED II I VI I IS}5XAT10 }6M II COS} }0
PROJBCT C.I.P. DODGE? I BUDGET BUOGIT BUDGET BUDGET II TEAR I AUGUST I TZAR II COMPLITI
-- 70TA4PROJECTS--
C. Eeclaaation Plant Sites I II I I I I II I II
1. Site Acquisition 15,000,000 II 1,500,0001 10,500,000 E I II 1s,00i,000 I 15,000,000 II
2. Reclamation Plant 62,000,000E �I - 100_000I - 100_000 i:B00t000I 1150005000 118,000,000 3950005000E i3t000:000I 62,ODOt000 I -----------
SUB-707AL - RECLAMATION PLANTS 77,000 000 II II 1 600 OOo I 10 600 000 i B00 000 I II 000 000 I IB 000 000 51 000'5000 23 OOOt000 I 77 000 000 II -----------
D. Interpliat and Join[ II II I I I I
1. Admin. Building Expin. 6 Rehab. J-7-1, J-7-5 5,710,000 3,740,000 II 2,000,000 E 11 2,000,000 E I 2,000,0001E
2. rehab/Cone gist Lab 0o Office it ?It 1, J-11-1 040,000 1 11 50,000 E 50,000 E 100,000 E 11 900,000 E 1 900,000 1E
3. Ootfill Booster Station, Jd S,J-1SA 27,269,000 1 25,719,00011 1,500,000 1 1I I 1,500,000 E 1,500,000
I. Central Laboratory, J-17 1,775,000 E 175,0001E I,000,000 3,000,000 E 500,000 I 7,500,000 E 7,500,000 11
S. Central Damietta, facility II 1 I I II II
1. Iquipaeet Preporckite, J-IfA 22,000,0001 5,000,00011 u,000,000 1 1,000,000 1 1,000,000 1 1,000,100 1 1,000,00011 17,0DO,000 1 1 17,000,000 11
In. Imissiog Pnrcbase, J-15D 3,010,000 E 3,050,000 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11
C. Plant 1 facility, J-19-1 15,799,500 E 799,500 11 31000,0001 6,100,0001 1,000,0001 1 11 15,000,000 1 1 15,000,000 11
d. Plant 2 facility, J-19.2 25,799,500 E 799,500 II 9,000,0001 12,000,0001 1'000,0011 1 II 25,000,000 I I IS1010,000 II
6. Warehouse/Maintenance Bldg,. 6 Oil Dock, J-20 3,184,0001 1,381,000 11 2,500,0001 1 II 2,500,0001 I 2,500,000 11
7. Waste Gas Flares,J-21, J-21A 762,000 I 112,0001E 650,000 E I I I 650,000 E 630,000 II
1. Outfall 6 Booster Pulp stations II I I II II
1. Replacement of TO- Outfall Sever, J-22-1 (Land) 2,029,000 E 29,0001E 1,000,0001 900,0001 100,0001 II 2,000,0001 21000,000 11
b. Replace Outfall He. 1 Land Section, J-22-2 2,IIB,OOo 1 11 2,000,000 2,000,000 II8,0001 2,111,000 11
C. New Surge Tower No. 1, J-22-1 1,300,0001 II 1,000,000 II 1,000,000 100,000 E I,Io0,000 11
d. }sop Cl2 Station for Outtall No, 1 2,600,0001 11 1 1 II 2,600,000E 2,600,000 II
I. Second Discharge leader CURB 'C' 3,960,0001 11 1 1 100,000 400,000 3,510,000 E 3,160,000
f. Extend 7B' to Deep Water Silb 120. Oradell 36,209,0001 II1 1I II I 291019,o00I 29,089,000 7,200,000
9. Operations Building, J-23-1 6 2 3,500,000 E 8,000 1,500,000 E 2,000,000 E I I II 3,500,000 I 3,504,000 II
10. influent floneter and test fac111ty,J-21121A/HB 500,000 E II 500,000 E I I II 500,000 E I $00,000 II
11. Personnel Building at ?It I, J-26 908,000 E E1 100,004 500,000 E 398,000 I 906,000 E 911,000
12. Ileclriral Power Systems Rebabllitatioa 3,000,000 E II I I I II 1 3,000,000 E 3,000,0001E
13. Earthquake Preparedness 7,305,000 E 11 400,000 E 400,000 E 130,000 330,ice 330,000 E 1,790,000 E 1,525,00D 1 3,115,000 3,190,000
14, laterpliat Ficilite,, 1-9 II I 11 II
a. 120- laterplant line 21,600,000 E II 2,000,000 1 12,400,000 1 12,400,000 1 E I 27,600,000 1 1 27,600,000 II
b, taterpl,st Utility Chase 1,010,000 E II BIO,oDo 31600,000 3,600,000 I II 8,010,000 I I,DI0,000 11
C. Industrial Water Line 600,000 E I 60,000 270,000 270,000 600,000 I 600,000
d. Digester Gas Line 900,000 100,000 100,000E 100,000 I 900,000E I 900,000
e. COBRNllicatlaa, Cable 120,0DO I 10,000 1 $5,000 1 55,000 1 1 II 120,000 1 I 120,600 11
15. Sludge Disposal I I I I 11 1 I 11
a. CONPOSL Demonstration Plant 9,000,000 E I 2,700,000E 6,IDO,DOO I 9,S0U,000 1 I 9,000,000,11
B. land Aqulsitioo 22,000,000 E II I 1,000,D0o 11 L,ODO,000 1 21,000,000 1 22,o0o,000 11
C. Landfill Developaent Phase I 20,600,000 E 11 13,000,000 13,DD0,00011 15,600,000
d. Coaposl facility 50,100,000 E I I II 5,010,000 E 5,040,000 IE 45,160,000
It. Busbard latetpliat Replacement 26,370,000 I II 12,000,000 1 12,000,000 It 11,170,000
17. list fro3ects 1000,000 II - 5005000 I - soo5oi0 I - SOOt000 I - s00,o00 - 5005000 I - 25S0o50D0 I 353005000 - 550005000 I ...........
SUB-TOTAL - IN71R7LAU} 1 JOINT 355,536 000 10 966 000 I U SIO 000 I /7 075 000 I 8 11] 000 1 S70 000 @ 910 000 111 9B1 000 91 Ofit 000 2t8 OSO 000 II B6:S2D5000
----
SUB-70TAL - MAJOR PROJECTS 190191E 000 I 106 S73 000 II IOo.510 000 I 133 B77 000 I 111 106 000 6S 710 000 11 165 000 I ISS 65i 000 171 017:000 I 636 69S 000 II IS7:671:OOD
CORP89_1.1ts 5117189_10:01 AM
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING ?END SCRIDULI B-I
SUMMARY OF Jet MT volts COMSTBOCTION PIQUIRININTS Page 1
1989-1990 to 1999-1999
A B C D I 1 D M I J A
ISTINA71D I ISTIHATHD REQUIRED I ESTIMATED I ESTIMATED I ISTINATID I ISTINATID II 11VE I ISTIHATIO 1 790 COST TO
?toilet I C.I.P. BUDGET BUDGET I BUDGIT BOUGHT BUDGE? II TSAR BUDGET I TEAM II COMPLITI
TOTAL I 6130109 1919-10 I 1990-51 I 1991-92 I 1992-93 I 1993-94 TOTAL I 1994-99 TOTAL PROJECTS
2. Special Projects I II I II I II
II I I II I II
A. mister PIan161B RepOrt6 I II I I I II I I
1. Action Plan - Environmental Assexsaent Program 601,0001 107,000 200,000 E 300,0061 I I II 500,000 E I 500,00011
2, Action Plan - COmlanity, Outreach Program 342,000.1 3o2,000 25,000 1 10,609 1 5,000 I II 10,001 I 10,000 11
3. Action Flat - Facilities Plan/Master Plan 2,337,000 I 2,287,000 II 50,000 1 1 1 1 II 50,000 1 1 50,ODO II I. Action Plan - Legislative/Regulatory Program 43,000E 10,000 II 25,000 I I I 25,000 I 25,000
S. Attloo Plan - Financial Plan 90,000 I 80,000 II 10,000 I I I I 10,000 I 10,000 II
6. Active Plan - NPDE6 Perait Application 53,000E 33,000 II 20,000 I I I 20,000 I 20,000
7. Action Plan - Management 8 Coordination 36,000E 26,000 II 10,000 I II 10,000 1 I 10,00011
B. Solids Treatment and Disposal Projects 196,0001 46,00011 50,000 I 50,Ooo 1 50,0001 1 II 150,000 1 " I 150,00011
C. Deep Octal Disposal Evaluation 519,0001 579,00011 1 I I 10,000 11 10,0001 1 10,000 II
D. Air Quality Control Progral 1 II 1 I I I 11 1 1 II
1. Air Toxic$ Inventory 1AB250BI 100,0001 II 50,0001 25,0001 25,000 I II 100,0001 100,00011
2. VOC/vas RACE Demonstration Ptogral 250,000 E II 50,000 E 75,000 75,000 25,000 E 25,000 II 250,000 E 250,000 II
1. Cbetical Handling and Control Improvements 25,000E II 10,000E 15,000E I II 25,000 I 25,000 II
P. Oman Discharge foapllwe Program I I I II I I
1. BioassT Project 50,0001 11 15,000 1 20,0001 15,0001 1 II 50,000 1 1 50,00011
2. ocean Monitoring Studies 150,000 1 II 50,000 I 50,0001 50,0001 1 II 150,000 1 1 150,000 It
3. Toxins Reduction Evalualloo (TEE) Project 250,0001 II I 50,000 1 200,0001 I II - 250,000 1 1 250,000 II
G. Soiree Control and Amite Management Program I I I I I I II I 1 11
1. In-House Hazardous Waste Management Program 25,000 1 15,000 1 10,000 1 11 25,060 1 25,000 11
2. 7runAline Monitoring 320,000 20,000 150,000 1 150,000 1 I 320,000 1 320,000 II
3. Waste Minimization 70,000 30,000 10,000 E I 70,000 I 70,000 11
1. Pertinent Household Waste Collection Sites 250,000E 125,000E 125,000E I I I 250,000 250,000 II
H. Laboratory Development Program 125,000E II 25,000 E 100,000E I II 125,000 125,000 II
----------- ---------- ---------- I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- 11 -----------
SOF-TOTAL - SPECIAL PROJECTS 5,111,000 I 3,178,000 56S,000 I 595,000 120,000 I 25,000 35,000 11 1,640,000 1 I 1,610,000 II
...........I ---------- I I ---------- I ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- II ........... I ---------- ........... 11 -----------
3. Eguipmeat items 32,S50,090I II 1,650,000 I I,SO0,000 1,250,000 1,250,000E 1,250,060 II 6,900,000 E 6,250,0001 13,150,0o011 19,100,000
........... .......... I ---------- ---------- I ---------- ---------- I ---------- I I ----------- I ---------- I ----------- -----------
TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL F.EQUIREHINfS 920,616,0001 110,093,000 II 102,72S,000 135,932,0001 113,016,000 67,015,0001 15,450,000 11 16/,198,000 177,287,000 641,485,000 117,078,000
I ::::::::::: 11 , I ::::::::: :t*%zzzzzzI 11 1zzr=zz=t=t
70AL WITH St INFLATION PEI YEAH 1,181,791,116 110,05J,800 102,725,000 112,728,600 124,666,290 77,570,239 55,211,118 502,912,877 250,054,039 752,997,716 318,740,400
............. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
f ! t I I I I I I - 1 4 t I t l
4 1 1 4 4 4 4 1 4 1 1 4 1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SCHEDULE C
COAF EQUIPMENT BUDGET 4/I8189
1989-50
TRUCES A OTHER MACHINE COMMON INSIA 6 TEST SAFETY OFFICE
DEPT VEHICLES MOBILE EQ. EQ G toots EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT 6 TRAFFIC EQ FIX 6 EQ 07HER TOTAL
NO. DEPARTMENT SSS61-1-00 55562-1-00 55563-N-00 55S64-1-00 55566-1-00 55567-1-00 5556E-1-00 55569-1-00 BUDGET
...- --........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ..........
2150 Management Office
Managesenl Support 15,000 15,000
Personnel 100.000 55,800 1S5,800
2210 Director Of Finance 15,000 15,000
2220 Accounting 61,800 61.800
2230 Purchasing/Warehousing 3,000 10,000 13.000
2240 Information Systems 25,000 11.735 31,350 11,500 105.388 266,973
3310 General Superintendent 11,600 10.600 14,550 66.750
3330 Plant Maintenance 43,000 17,700 95,150 5,000 160.650
3340 Collection Facilities 8,000 31.200 8,100 ITS 47,475
JSSO Aschaniul Maintenance 25,400 65,000 15,915 3,m 22.025 1111900
3360 Electrical Maintenance 21,200 1.889 4,081 2S,000 5.678 2,619 60,467
3370 Instrument. Maintenance 11,60 12,050 4,805 3,880 32,335
3380 Treatment Plant Ober. 29,225 16,850 10.000 S,S00 11.000 70,575
3510 Director of Technical Bar. 12,630 12,630
3520 Compliance 38.010 38,010
3580 Laboratories 3,200 I04,490 3.310 191.000
3590 Industrial Waste 32,000 15,050 16,000 2,700 19.950 85,700
3710 Director of Engineering 2,700 2.700
3720 Planning and Design 8,500 71,000 79.500
3790 Construction Managesenl 41,500 46,600 46,450 7,485 3,800 16,900 162,535
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
T07AL 89.90 REQUESTS 316,200 163.549 1a9,N06 137.050 283,305 30,770 569,112 0 1.650.000
--'-------- ----------- -----"-"--- ........... -...-"-""-- ----------- ----------- ---........ , ......-"---
a 4 o 1 4 4 1 4 4 1 A 4 1 1 ti t
:01989 1.ILS CAPITAL 6MAY REVOLVING POND
CLASSIFICATION Of BUDGETED PROJECTS It REVENUE PIOGRAN CATEGORIES SCHEDULE B-2
FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 Page 1
8 f 0 1 P G
1EQUIRiC 11PLACINNT INPIOVID ADDITIONAL I RAPLACINN7 INPROVID ADDITIONAL
BUDGE? R TREATMENT CAPACITY 6 7RIATNINT CAPIICITT
1919.9E AACOXS71 RICOXSTA
1. New and Iebudgeted Nator Protects
A. Retlamatilw Pilot 1
1. lapansiom to BO AGO, PI.16-1 100,000 loot 100,000
2, Missile No.2 I Mist 10.1, ?1-2001-01 1,000,000 lot 601 11600.000 211001000
J. odor Central facilities
a. Coven for Primary Basins. 11-25 I 100.000 100E 100,000
I. Foal Air Scrubber System, PI.26 :00.000 100E 200,000
4. lntraaaell5ecmrltyllaterior 1madsILasdfCOpmog Pt-:i 900.000 50% 59% 450,000 450,000
S. Primary Clarifiers gas. 6.15, PI-SS 12,000,000 100E 12,000,000
6. Digesters 11-16 aad Gas Doodling System, PI.71-1 11,000,600 201 sot 21400,000 1,600,00e
7. Sludge Ramdling facilities, PI-3I-2 10,000.000 501 50% 5,000,000 5,000,000
8. Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 a 8. P1.95-1 :.501000 loot 2,250.000
9. Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 a 10, PI-35.2 loot
10. Underground Tank leplaCtieftt At Floor 1, HIM 10,000 1001 I01000
11. Fuel System IAprovemeats. 1-033-1 ISO1006 100% 150,000
12. Central Air Osapresmor Station 50% 50%
11. Electrlflcetloa Protect 100.000 100% 1001600
14. Primary ireetfeat 36 NGD 100,000 1001 100.000
15. Primary Treatment l6 KID ISO%
16, Belt Presses 11 laitel 1001
17. law Sewage laergency Bypass loot
10. DAPs: J 0 10' Diameter (00,000 1001 100,000
19. Solids Storage II stool 1001
20. Staidly Power Geearation 15ol
21. MsaitoriaglComarol System 1,000,000 tool 1.000,000
22. Digesters: 2 1110' Disaster loot
27. always trickling filters 163 1 100E
24. l2kv Electrical Power Distribution 100E
25. 10 NGD Oeygea Activated Sludge a DAI's 100E
26. misc. Protects 11000.000 bat 201 101 600.000 iD0,000 100.000
12,510,00o
SOB-TOTAL - RICLANATION PLANT 1 a.310100D fii0,000 51,ES0,000
COAl39 1.its CAPITAL OUTLAY SHOVING FUND
^-USSIIICA}ION Of BUDGITID PAOJICTS BY RIVIA01 PROGRAM CATIGOIIIS SCNROULI B-2
FISCAL TIAN 1989-90 Page 2
A B D 1 f G
RIGUIIID 1 ILPLACRXRT 11PPOVID ADDITIONAL A9PLACINMT INPIOVID ADDITIONAL
WD6R S TRIAUJIT CAPA[I}T i TRIATNIII CAPACITT
19P!-90 AICOASTI AIf0A5T1
B. Treatment Pleat 2
1. Additional 165 TOOL %gestet 10%
2. operations Building, P2-23-5-1 500.100 1001 500.000
3. Upgrade Activated slvdge System. P2.50 100.000 1001 100,000
1. Additional OAF 100.000 loci 100,040
5. Odor Coatrol Facilities
a. Primary Bastes 'A' tbru 'C' Cuvers, P2-31 450.000 100% 450.000
I. foil Air scrabbers system. PZ-33 :50,000 loot :50.000
C. Ispronols Ln Grit facility R. Billings Tunael
and Distribution Warner' A. P2-31 WHO 1001 ( 50,000
6. Landscape and Support facilities I
i. VireBouse Buildima, P2-JS-f $00.000 loot SWOON
b. Xaictesue BBaldiag , V-35-3 100.006 1001 100.000
C. Construction Management Office, P245-1 $00.000 Ioat 510.000
d. Phase II Site and Security loprovesemts, P2-35-5 IOO,000 100% 100,000
7. Misc Xodifas a Isprovesents to facilities, P2-37 2.300.000 loot :,300,000
1. Ithabil:tltioa 0! Digesters I,J,6L,N,N a 0. P2-39 3.000,000 100% 3,000,000
1. Process Control :ospater Monitor Jsproveients. P2.1D :50.000 50% Hi I2L 000 !E5.000
to. Primary Treatment Es NGD.P2-11 100.000 1001 590.000
I1. Undergromad Lot Replacement. R427-3 II.000 1 1001 ......
12. Joel System IBproeemtats. 1-033-2 I50,000 loci 150,000
13. Overflow PUP Station ID01
Is. llectrification Prolett l00,000 100% 200,100
15. Solids Storage: 2 Bins 100%
IS. Potable water Distribution $raise I 1'301
if. Molitor!B91control system JD.00c 501 SOt IS,000 IS A00
it. Standby Power Generation loci
19, Plant water Pulp Station loci
20. MISC. Pro7rts L000.000 to% -'01 a-01 600.000 E00.000 -'00,000
ROB-}OVAL - '.!SA}NfNi PLANT ! 1.).090.OD0 7.950:000 I - 900,000 1.290:coo
:OIF99 i.I1i CIPITIL OMUT GROWING Trip
:W51TIUTi%of BUGETIO PIWIMS IT allies[ pimm%UfOI115 SCIRDOU 1-E
KSCAL Tug 1969-90 Page 1
A e C 0 3 P G
RICOIRIL 21PUCU! :RMID A%ITIOBAL I ftpUCU% Uf10VID AODinoo L j
PROGn S TalA"IR UPACITT 4 TREAT CAPACITT
1919-90 RICOUTR R9CORSTI
C. Lecla tloa Plant Gates
:. Si:e Acquisition g.asA,OOA SAI 01 I 21211,000 :,ESO,AAO
:. ieclaeatlu Plant 3 Am. so 57i S•% 50.000 50.000
SOB-yMAL - 31CUMUM FPS 1.600,000 2,300,000 E.1oo.ec,
0. laterplant led Joint -
1. Adun. Euildiag loran. A Leub. 3 1.1. J-7-5 I ±1000.000 10% lot lot 1
Ao,0o/ a0.010 1.40/.000
2. RAWCOUT. list. tab it pal 1 In Otllce. J-!I-1 1 5^..Oas loot 1 50.000
3. Ortfill Booster Station. J-!S.J-I:A !,`.0AJa0 701 1 201 1.050.001 !:LOBO '
R. Logical Laboratory, J-17 i 1300.040 flat 4,100:400
S. Central Brw%tio,flulity
1. luipleat propensities, J-19A I 11.000,000 Sol Sot 5.500.000 5,500.000
b. biomass Petcuse. MOB
C. ?lilt 1 !ullltT, J-19-1 1.8001000 51% ion :.500.000 L:as,000
d. Plan! '. lactlttl. J-19-1 i.000.000 50% S% j OWN. LSOO,OOo
6. olse'Nustfunce a ides. ISA,100 1total651,Ias A Oil sock, J-25 E.500.060 5a1 Sol LESp'009 I 1,250,000
1, garte
I. 0u[flli A Buster Pup$Latlw$
a. Replacement of TB' Britoil Semen. J-:2,1 ILoad) I,0/0.0% fOBi I,Oo0.as0
). Replace Outfall ea. 1 Laid tactics. 3- I IOOi
r. New Sorge?net so. 1, J-'N last
d. Temp C12 Starts. for 0 tfall ec. 1 !ast
e. Second Discharge HERZ Idea 'C' I tat 34%
f. Intend 78' to Deep Utar Vitt 120' Utfall I 1301
9. operatic., Staining, J-E1-1 S : 1.91.000 501 50% j '11,001 I 751.000
N. Influent flowerer and Test tic llty.l`-l:?:b:IB 500 DAD 100% j 100,000 ,
11. Feistiest Building at Pit !, ld9 % '000 IOOt Ias.D00
12. Electrical Pacer System,Rouralut¢g loot
❑. tar%Ouake Preparedness 400.000 1001 440,100
11. Interplant Militia. I.?
1. '_'o' Iaterplut Ill, :,840,000 . ill 50% :10.000 I E,51a.otO
I. isterplut ftil#y West H0.011 :11 lot 153.000 /71.asp !
c. Iuutnml later Line WOOD Sot 50% I0.000 l/,Vas
I. minister Gas Lt., 100.1 5% 50% 50.000
e, lau,uratilos Cult 0.100 S/i 501 5,000 5,000
I!. Slide, slag wal j
a. Cwposl Demonstutlaa Plant in 501
I. Land AnuiSILlw iJl :at
c. Landfill DAIAI.P,est %ase I :d1 SOt
d. Compost lacll:[y :It 50%
15. Bombard Interplant Replace...t at :of
:7. ease Project, 540,Goo 401 j Hi 201 100,000 100.000 ....... I
MMOTAL - IRiIIPLtrt 1 401" 11,511,Ias li,U1,000 3,1as.010 EE.fEi,Ul
SUMOTAL - MAJOR PROJICTS 100,510,000 31,/93 000 51200,000 57,1.7,00a
COAP89 L34S
CAPITAL 0"LAY RIVOLVING ➢Igo
:LASSIP3CATIO1 GP BOOGBTIO PROJKC75 BY RIVINUI PROGRAM CATEGORIIS SCHIDOLE 2-2
FISCAL TEAR 1989-90 Page 1
9 B C D I G
REQUIRED BEPLACINNE IMPROVED ADDITIONAL RIPLACAMNT IMPROVED RIQUIRID
BUDGIT B CAEATMINT CAPACITY 6 TREATMENT CAPACITY
1989-90 RECORDER RICONSTR
;. Special Projects
1. Paste[ planjIII Reports
1. Action Plan - Environmental Assessment Program 200,000 LOOT 200,000
2. Action Plan - Cosmuaity Outreach Program 2S.000 ton 25.000
7. Action Plan • !scllitles Plaalm ester ?Ian 50,000 i5oi 50,000
a. ActlOn Plan - Leglslativeileguletory Program 25,000 104% 25,000
S. Action Plan - Financial Plan 10,000 t00% 10,000
6. Action Plan - RYDER Permit Implicating 20.000 1001 20,000
7. Action Plan - Management i Coordination 10,000 100E 10,000
S. Solids Treatment and Disposal Project: WOOD 1001 50,000
C. Deep Ocean Disposal Evaluation 100E
D. Air Quality Control ?sons.
1. Air Toxlcs Inventory IASJSBB1 5010DO 100E 50,000
2. VOUROG BACT Dncns[ratloa Program 50,000 toot 50,000
1. Chemical Handling and Control [mproveoeu[s IQ,goo Two% 10.000
!. Ocean Discharge Cgep113nte P[ggla0
I. BJgeasy Project 15.000 loot 1`.1000
2. Ocean Monitoring Studies 50,000 100% 50,000
3. Toxits Reduction Evaluation ITRBI Project 100E
G. Source Control and waste Managesea[ Pngran
1. !a-HUU6e Hazardous waste Management Program 15,000 100E 15,000
2. Trunktlae RDnitoling 20,000 !Do% 20,000
3. waste NinSmstatlon 30,000 I001 30,000
a. permanent Rcusebold waste Collection Sites 125.000 100% 121,000
A. Laboratory Development Program 2f.000 loot 25 000
SOB-TOTAL • SPECIAL PROJECTS SfiS,0o0 IiS.000 340.000
-.--...... .......... .......... .......
S. Equipment items I,6SO.00D lot 60% 30% 165,000 190,000 193.000
.......... '37" .;Do .......... ..........
TOTAL JOINT VORIS CAPITAL IEQOJRINERTS 1
OE,12S,000 71.6SI,o00S2.000
q
i
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 - 7: 30 P.M.
1 ` l
~ FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5104/89 PAGE 1
E
- REPORT NUMBER APOJ _
UM ON
TRrrve
tmar
CLAIMS PAtD 05/30/B9 POSTING DATE 05/16/89
^oAN7-N0� •'ENDOR— AROWIi OES Co IeT rnu
099451 A.M. SCSI COMPANY $90.1O PUBLICATION
f111—. fi 563 06 —.`.^,Gt;,BBR6NGd6RV2G68 R46T 6
099453 ACME WELDING $3,915.70 TRAILER REPAIR
199454 AOVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. $1.391,678.97 CONSTRUCTION 0-15
099455 A7ERICAN COMPUTER
'265.00 ---- —A}RIA6-ptl0iG6 ----
099456 AMERICAN COMPUTER SUPPLY s27.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES
..b 099457 AMERICAN MEDIA. INC. $557.95 VIDEO
9456 •LE ALCAA�LCNMICAL�11^^• • 11.4_^°.•• - SILK
IT7 099459 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $4,366.32 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7
Z 399460 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. s40.04 MECHANICAL PARTS
-� Ogg-,- -4R&u&_sysT a& tl.31B..El -- NOTEGR6 6-06
099462 ARATEA SERVICES. INC. 1540.35 UNIFORMS
099463 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $99.341.22 MIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88
�.T 689464 BAY E77� SUPPLY s954 ^0 fiAPS'TY SIIPPLLR4
099465 BACHARACH. INC. 3221.4E INSTRUMENT MAIM
1199466 P.Y. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. f61940.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-25626.P2-32.33.34.37
-00 C99468 —BAXTER}SCIENTIFIC PR --LABC�
W C9946B BEATER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $14146.85 LAB SUPPLIES
499969 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES. INC. 5146.85 CAR WASH
WM 1- TICKETS
mA
99471 ROBERT BEIN.WILRERD0.0ROST b 664 B5 - --------ENGINJOINT-SERVICE - —_
n 099472 BOISET CASCADE
I OFFICLIAME
FROST 6 AS $
$1.641.32 OFFICE
SERVICES 80-I44-5.89-I4
09947E BOISE CAECADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 3L641.SL OFFICE ARTS
C7CORP 09947 BOYLE ENGINEERING
ILRIN6 $64.821.93 NATCRMTG SERVICES E6 88-I05
099415 BRENNN-FIEDLEP L ASSOC.. INC. 3386.64 INSTRUMENT GBPPLI¢S
M ! ' ETREE 55 0 BG WATER
09947 BROWN f CALWELL $220.00 LAG SERVICES 099078 BROWN f CALDYELL CONSULTING f27.518.56
-
ENGINEERING SERVICES P3-37
:---A 099480'.. —._--BURKE-ENGINEERING
CO. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
-1 099481 BUPNC G.
STNEERIXG CO. $44.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
CA 0994tl1 6ARY G. STR EEO 3460.56 PlTTY CAStl REIMBURSEMENT
_--Y9948! H-N-REEBNDI T-3ONdM6 08 0378+a0-
099483 CS COMPANY $3,342.11 VALVE
C99484 CSI-CALTROL 14.503.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS
.. ._—. 4"465--..—. _.BAk-KASS-FOP-RESEAR".r NC----:}}.}i ______.____
699486 CAL-FAC CHEMICAL CO., INC. $60.05 CHEMICALS
099467 CARLETON ENGINEERS $4.466.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES
-CAR0kl4 EN6}NEER' —iBWrV1150r47 —----eNGIN88RIBG-6ERViC¢6--J-kS.f}-20=.--_-
., 099489 CASE POWER f EQUIPMENT 31.938.39 I== PARTS
099496 CENTURY SAFETY INS7. f BUFF. f118.08 SAP6TY SUPPLIES
1.
._-_. 094492
94493 --'-CHHEEMM SERVICE CE-COr_---_-----A2$45 O.100---- __--W SUPPLIES
099493 CXEMYEST INDUSTRIES. INC. f80.574.40 FERIC CHLORIDE
M.O.I1-09-09
099495 CHEVRON U.S.A.. IMC. $13.595.30 OIL A GREASE
099496 CHRISTEVE CORP. 1804.152.T5 - COMBTWCTI0N 5-31
,
D
N FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 5/64/89 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID OS/10/89 POSTING GATE O5/30/89
,•� .WARRANT NO __ MS.NP.O IL 4MOUNT DESCRIPTION
C99497 WILLIAM N. CLARKE 596.00 MEETING MERGE
09949R CORINNE CLAWSON $423.05 MEETING MUSE _
^I 099499 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY $323.40B.00 INSURANCE M.O. 4-12-89
� 099500 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF 52.080.00 ALUMINUM PLATING
°t 099501 — TRUCK PARTS
099502 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 52.632.01 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
099563 CONSOLIDATED FREIGhTYAYS $944.99 FREIGHT
" D 099509 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES 52.590 .9 NECNANCIAL SUPPLIES
� 099505 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2.269.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
Z 099506 CRANE VEYOR CORP. $442.83 BUILDING MATERIALS
_CHARLES—P__CB➢WLELSO.• 556.76 _ _ PUMP PARTS —
099503 CAL WATER 9165.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
099509 CYBEREX i2.250.0C SERVICE AGREEMENT
� 99 510 D.G. ENGINEERING 5950.03 TRUCK REPAIRS —
M 099511 ORE. INC. $273.30 HARDIRM
` 3 099512 DANICLS TIRE SERVICE $5.580.01 TIMES
A 99513_ TOM OANE9_— 5105.58 ____-MEETING EXPENSE
9t 099514 DECO $676.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
099515 OEZURIM ANO/OR CS CO. 52.812.94 VALVE PARTS
' I R99 DIA,IE.C_EDLYMFRS 1P.A05.90 _ _ ANIONIC POLYMER H.Q.8-10-88
191511 DICKSONS 598.55 ELECTRIC PARTS
r 099510 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $3,903.22 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIR
nONN.EDVARIIS.SLRE. .i1R.2R -_—_ PAINT sueeLies __..
099520 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. $499.79 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT
tZJ 099521 EPE TECHNOL06TES 51.879.13 REFUND USSR PER OVERPAYMENT
09952 V. M. E BERT CORP. $10 . . CONST2-27
RUCTION
099524 ECOSYSTEMS EN6.6 ANALYSIS i1.260.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
u.
.... .-. <i ae9-ia __.______ - ACTTOtl PLAN SLIOPfi _ _ �
099 n1c DWARD L. VISUAL.IMAGE°• -
�099526 114
ED WRD L. ELLIOT. JF. 5752.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 14.
N 099527 EMERY S PUROLATOR $35.00 FREIGHT
nec ENEMANIEE.. At- a Inn.1n OCEANOOP_APNIC RESEARCH M.0.6.10-R7
099529 EVERECT EQUIPMENT $7,618.18 LOCKERS
099530 FACTORY REPRESENTATIVE. INC. 5686.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS
--D9951L--.--JONN��FALNE NS TEIb._P C '3 SID-LO CO SMUCII07♦_SRRv�S_J_-7="-20_.
C99532 FARR SALES R SERVICE $220.44 FILTER
C99533 FAST TRACK. INC. $69.00 COMPUTER SOFMIARE n
- 'i85`1A rE-0ERAL-ESRR SS CORP 'iR6.5° —AIM PRRLGNr _- i..
999535 FERRELLGAS $9.75 PROPANE
099536 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1.387.50 HECNANICAL PARTS -
.`--.-099513--..—_.._ . 114-SYSTEMS.__.----_—.. ee_.5n_yb PU@ PARTR _ _____ _
099`_38 GELDER PUMPS. INC. $251.02 PUMP PARTS
` 099539 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $203.01 PAINT SUPPLIES
p3g5A0 —LAIEiFLE8LLA5S_1NSI. re< ay iee_an .._ _CORTBACTSRRVTrrs
094541 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. $5,650.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-13
099542 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION $100.267.30 CONSTRUCTION J-13A
D
.. I
a
1
W FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04/49 PAGE 3
- REPORT NUMBER AP43 ..
CLAIMS PAID 05/10/89 POSTING DATE 05/10/69 _
V`"AAHT " --.YENOOP ---_ nrc�e r0.mu
099593 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.263.84 TELRPNONE
09954E SI - MECRANIf PARTS
099546 GILDLICK-MTTCBIOMA INC. f19$868.41 ROBAHICAL PARTS
0995A6 60LDEN COAST BIOMASS ENERGY CO f868.A. ROBUST
TRONA0995i7 GREAT .ACIFIC ASSOC INC ....
116 40 ------- AUTOMOTIVE
TMO TY673Nf
099549 GREAT PAC iF IC ASSOCIATES
CO. ,293.51 ENGINEERING
PARTS
n 0995A9 DON 6RE EM { R IORRIULA IA TCS f6.293.51 ENCIN6ERLNG SERVICES IIES88-Ib1-2 In
m 099551 —GALPRINLSUPPLY lirnu '8`-'• W[NIGHT _
Z 099551 NpLopIN SUPPLY CO. $40.83 FITTINGS
099552 HARBOUR ENGINEERING 99,241.33 PUMP PARTS
— 199553----HEWLETG-K-TNK.-3NG. 3 2517.24 -- INSTRUMENT REPAIR
—_
099559 NEY LETT PAC KARD a517.2A INSTRUMENT REPAIR
099555 MllT 1. INC. $58.78 PUHP PARTS
"6 IIOOGiON-ELL CTR7t L1.BOS.A4 ®......�68RVI68G
fYl 099557 MOERGIBER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 31.899.08 MPACHANTCAL PARTS
3 099558 NOSE DOCTOR 3151.96 PUMP PARTS
��.9559 -MBUSE OF BATTERIES ......8-- --- BATIUTES -
099560 A.S. MUGMES CO.. INC. 5358.54 HARDWARE
099561 HUGHES MICROELECTRONIC $949.44 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
_- 09956P-- '. .vNTi MG4NI BEA6M i}}.g" " --- �AT8B-U6"dG5
099563 HUKTIN6TON SUPPLY 312T.2C BARDRARE
f' 099564 IND DELAVAL INC. $1.608.56 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
-L-09966fi —id60-99NPAN9— ` --------iNS'ERUM�9 -----
Cy 099566 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,191:09 FITTINGS
099567 INGRAM PAPER A256.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES
---++w----- — 'AViN`..-RINGi:- AYER DISTRICT
IA 099569 RIVIERA FINANCE $678.82 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
.� 099578 KAMAN BEARINGS t SUPPLY 386.99 FITTINGS
--�T-19957Y----. ._ NRNER-COMPANY___-- „-,tfi _ ..-._ _ .-_ -TDOLS
N 399572 KEENAN SUPPLY $570.49 VALVE
099573 THE KEITH COMPANIES 39.418.04 ENGINEERING SERVICES MS 88-65-5
---R99S9f--M}EVifi-PAOIFI —CONSTRUCTION ERVICEB-PI-2"I-3F— '- ---.
695575 KING BEARING. INC. $13.339.45 MACHINE SUPPLIES
099576 KIRST PUMP A MACHINE WORKS $1.855.00 PURR, PARTS
—0999"---NARTIN-e ORDtCMr SP— .YPM2rR8---- --�ONeTRUCVEON�eRviCe9-5-Y9:5-31--- -- ----
,. 099570 L.A. LIQUID MANGLING SYSTEMS 51.367.52 PIRG PARTS
099579 L.B.Y.S., INC. 521.69 WELDING SUPPLIES
.,, 099500 "SEA-SUPPLiE9-i-SERVIBE ----35Hs1}-----PRSNT'-SUPPtte9 --- -
,, 099561 ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE $300.00 PUBLICATIONS
099582 LEARN - PC VIDEO SYSTEMS $703.50 COMPUTER VIDEO
-------;-LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE-BUPFN ----SY5s00---- - --- CYLIMOERREPALRB---- -- - - - - —;-
0995b0 LIMITOPOUC CORP. $1,876.35 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
099585 K.F. LINDSTROM, INC. 313.359.A0 CONSULTING SERVICES-MASTER PLO
'—�99566------NBC-IPPLIEO-ENVIRONM 16rOO ------ -OCEAR-MONITORING-- - ---
099587 NPS $52.37 PHOTO SERVICES
09958E MACOMCO f109.80 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
b
i
W
ri
-� FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/09/89 PAGE 9
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
05/
CLAIMS PAID OS/l0/0/B9 POSTING GATE OS/10/89 I�
A
:_—WARRAN.T 0. ._. —YEYDDR ANDUYT _--_DESCRIPTION
099589 MALCOLM FINNIE A INC. 3406.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES - MASTER PLAN
099590 MARSHALL MAINT. PRODUCTIONS 3283.0E SAPETT VIDEOS
099592 NARVAC ELECTRONICS $31.58 INSTRUKU T SUPPLIES "
099592 MASTER TOOLS SERVICES $512.84 TOOL REPAIR �•
IvI 099593 MATT . CHLOR. IMC, $1,753,67 _____CHLORINATION PARTS
•` 099594 MCNENNA CRAG. L EQUIP. $16,496.87 PUMP PARTS
a 099595 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP 5572.27 TRUCK PARTS
099596 MEDLIN CONK _
;T 099597 MILLIPORE AND/OR WATERS $1,166.00 LAB EQUIPMENT
" 2 099598 NLAOEN BUNTICN CONSTPUCTION CO S355.585.99 CONSTRUCTION 3-34R
099599 NONITEK, INC_ 3329.S2 -__ nF rr REPAIRS
'^ 099600 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO. 9300.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS
C99601 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $2.865.02 LAB SERVICES lu
OTfGM pDf,$]$Lfi3. Ib[. 3]31_61 RUBBER PROD11ET5 _
3 099603 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES $73.83 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
099609 NATIONAL ELECTRIC TEST. ASS DC. 3131.00 PUBLICATION
n99AO5— A.ELONAL.EJL7ER_%rnIA CGRE. -9,429.14
00 099606 NEAL SUPPLY GO. 6360.8R HARDWARE
099601 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $21.74 WATER USEAGE
a99[n. _NQRIMur9T MOTOR UrI ntum. INL .919_6C —_----_ Imruaxrnl. nears
099609 O.M.S. $1.560.00 TRASX BINS
r 099610 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $194.29 SAFETY CLASSES
—999A3` OEEICE PAxn ,ON/SNTEDUR 9ra_ _A• nrnry nmxmmF ______
17 099612 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDES .. 965.00 SUBCRIPTION
099613 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. $39.681.28 CHLORINE M.O. 10-12-88
—ALcn.n 9UPa�.Pa
099615 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $164.75 TRUCK PARTS
'-• 099616 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $30.16 CHEMICALS
_ORANGE_YALWC_LIITTOIR rA_ anrA_a9_-- FTWT r,,G
" 099618 OXYGEN SERVICE S912.91 SPECIALTY GASSES
N 099619 COUNTY OF ORANGE $3,982.9` ENGINEERING SERVICES
_ 'ON" S _._ RRTxanaar lJQRYFRG rONP TNaORdW!F
099621 PACIFIC DATA CON SYSTEMS S415.88 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
099622 PACO PUMPS S1,407.65 PUP PARTS
Q99623--WC1E3C-S.AELT-Y-EOUL"MZ CO- " ,.3A6.•a _._. —_-SAFnSSUY1IIle
099624 PACIFIC BELL $13.38 TELEPHONE
099625 PAK WEST S329.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
ARXEL2RODUCZ1OlG- IS1f . __ avry aTnrna _
099627 PARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY 1106.36 MECHANICAL PARTS
099628 PHOTO A SOUND CO. 3361.72 OFFICE EQUIPMENT'
--0 996 2 9---._-R.ILXUICX_PAPER-... — •^.17--.-__. ,IAXIrnaT., en2p...a —___.__
" 099636 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES S191.75 PWSTIC BOTTLES
099631 POLYPURE. INC. SIS,969.67 CATIONIC POLYMEIIS N.0.3-8-89
-00532 _JONELELEf IJ ZUERLa • - IpS:on ........
$99633 POWER MACHINE CO. $318.04 MHCHANICAL PARTS
099634 POWERWF $52.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
w•
FUND NO 9194 J7 DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04/89 PAGE 5
- REPORT NUMBER AP43 _
._i CLAIMS PAID 05/10/89 POSTING DATE 05/10/89 �.
�a ^0 -YEM Dne ___ nrvq.en nu is
099635 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $99.00 ICE -
,7 -�NSTRUM&VT�NSBRCT30N-Y1-20.J-45.g2-T3a3i- �
099637 RNI MARKETING $140.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES
099638 PECYC. INC. 339.140.09 SLUDGE REMOVAL X.0.5-11-88
899679 OGS .... ". _--�pgggKSiN1R5
099640 REMEDY TEMP '$1.026.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES
199641 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 3438.F5 PIPE FITTINGS
- n 6YNOL�PLWER TT4AX6M;S- S8t2`" - ..w"DARCiAI, REPAIRS �-
,�m 099643 J. R. :OBERT3 CORP. $444:228.39 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4,J-20
099644 ROB INSN FE RT IL"ER CO. 36852.46 CHEMICALS
n •'"64R_ ROSAN:.:E-MAM INC. i87-I ^..%� REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT --__ ,•.
p 99646 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL 33N54.9J INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES P;
.1996
99647 POTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. $268.06 - ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
I 099648 541"4 KLEEM-LORP
!�e m 099649 SANCON ENGINEERING INC. $27.800.00 SURE REPAIRS
099650 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO. $356.61 - LAB SUPPLIES
;_.- --GRO.G., SCN4EFTR--0{KON-ASSOCIATES i39.8B6 21 --- z.,O:NEERING-SERVICES DI T-a-E-Id----- ?'
CO 099652 THE SCHOOLEP CO. S3.753.00 APPRAISAL SERVICES _
099653 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS. INC. 1220.00 LAB SUPPLIES
899669 SE#-TOAST £81GN6 11 189eo.21 - PPIOB-REPAIRS --
�� n 099655 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $456.53 TOOLS
099656 SIGMA CIRCUTS $1,733.69 REFUND USER FEE OVEPAYMENNT
- F d9^657 -ar:Fe. M KERS-yESI 63i Be -- SDIDB-SERNIOES - -
21 0996598 SNITH.EHERY CO. $637.50 SOIL TESTING
095659 SNI rH FIPE A SUPPLY. INC $104.99 PLUNGING SUPPLIES
B99660 SOIL AND TEST-INS ENGINEERS H-r1 B1.iv- SOIL TESTING ---
;: --1 099661 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY S500.09 PERMIT FEES
099662 SOUTH COAST DODGE $37.14 TRUCK PARTS
v n�'99663-------SOUTHER N-SALE F.-EDIT DN-EO d1---------POWER ----
a: -1 G99664 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $23.263.88 DIESEL PUEL
099665 SPEAR PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION 311.932.68 CONSTRUCTION DIST 16
- PEE-TECH-YES TERN i'r---------YBLDINO-9HPPtIE9 -- -
099667 SPEECO 31.856.38 SCALE MAINTENANCE
jot! 099668 ROBERT SPIES $600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ANNUAL REPORT
-._-0996b9.----RTOR-TOOL-B-SUPPtT C E8- .___ S _-___-__ .__ ___
09967A SCOTT STEVENS $39.75 MEETING MUSE 'n.
099671 SUPELCO, INC. S1.345.80 LAB SUPPLIES
w: SUPP C*S
4.I 099E TS SUR-LITE CORPORATION $6.384.93 BURNER REPLACEMENTS
099674 7AQGINa WAGGON MOPILHONE PARK 3945.4E REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
nv
a
._.-.-b99695-.--.__.._.TAN-TAN AX IMF.-- -- -_ ---39T765:fi9--_- -_- EOMTRACYLNRSCAPING-._.__- .___ ..____..
099676 TAYLOR-DUNN $107.06 TRUCK PARTS 0-
099677 TELEPRODUCTS CORP. 1489.00 INSTRUMENT
�99693----i-PEAR-F1ilF INSUR6NCE 75B.d6— ---CRANT-DEEUS- ----- ---
G 99679 TRAVEL TRAVEL S46 T.d0 TRAYEL SERVICES
099606 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY. INC. 3582.17 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
1
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/O4189 PACE 6
D REPORT NUMBER AP43
M COUNTY SANITA ION DIS IC S OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/10/69 POSTING DATE 05/10/89
DESCRIPTIONWARRANT NO, vrmnoR AMOUNT
' 099681 TWINING LABORATORIES S11r852.25 PIPE INSPECTION
i• A CRIMMINS, INC f9.261.49 ENGINEERING 9¢RVLCBB P2-60
099663 UNOCAL $125.66 GASOLINE
I• 099689 THE UN180 URGE CORP. 3154.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
• 099685 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE PARCEL SERVICES
��1 099686 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE $1,268.03 REFUND USSR Pe¢ OVERPAYMENT
099687 URBAN ALTERNATIVES 38.166.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - COIOIUNITY OUTREACH PP.00 �1a
099AAN VYR SCIENTIFIC $2,323.55 LAB SUPPLIES
099689 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3,216.06 RARONAR¢
D 099690 VAREC DIVISION $9,158.58 MICHALIICAL PARTS
Gl 099691 VAR 11tl itl3TBYNENFJGROUP __._ ...
099692 VEHICLE SPRING SEPYICE $593.90 TRUCK REPAIRS
Z 099693 VEPTE} SYSTEMS 543975.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
0999 VILLAS (NSERES SUPPLY _
99695 VILLAGE NURSERIES 403.00 GROUND COVER
-n 029696 VORTEX INDUSTRIES fS 1900.00 BUILDING SSPAIR9 !gin
Fn n_ R91 .InNR R—MAPWARREN rc 5444.49 npUS MNSURL CE "MIN.
099699 CART WARREN i CO. 3300.J4 LIAR. INSURANCE OVERPAYMENT
G99699 WASTE WATER OISP05Al f30L306.19 R¢PDNO U380. PEE OV¢RPAYMBNT
" CK 099702 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY f12$440.54 GESTIC SODA N.0.8-10-88
'! I 099701 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. 3990.5E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
099 WOODYAulLSGftY3_ELYDE FMlCONSULTANTS *ur y$1 5LSAS78.30 _ ENG.INEERING SERVICES 1-12
099705 XEROXYARD CLTDE CONSULTANTS TB $5,849.74 COPIER LEASES
SERVICES - PILE DBIVIHC
099745 %EE CORP. f518A9.T9 COPIER LFASGS
�'DH3TRIIrTTI1M P9AI
.m O . ul
aP CA t-
--.- .—.TPTJ4lLAlxs sAm nS43189_ v7.7a l,as9_Pc „'
I� � 99RR SEERESS=SEVER
xl ati
m
:a
nl
i
m
D FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST NURSING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/04/89 PAGE 7
V REPORT NBMRER AP43
CODN' OUSITY
Cl SANITAD 0 DISTRI/10/89CSP OF POSTING
UP G'5/10/
CLAIMS PAID OS/10/B9 POSTING DATB 5/10/89
SUMMIT 1MOONI
/2 OPER PDND S 35.18
i2 ACO PUNp 3.997.51
'O /2 P FOND 253,266.95
/3 OPEe R FUND 116.149.38 _
_aL /3 AM FUND 258,070.05
G 3 F/l PUND 575.00
'.a /5 OPEN FUND 2.485.95
-c-f /5 P/R FUND 23,111.43
"y /6 AGO FUND 8.394.93
f6 F/H FUND 2.500.50
i] OPER PUND 7,241_49
1 j /] ACO POND 31,189.87
"-3 n P/R POND 61.863.60
/Il OPBR FUND 1,918.21
00 /14 OPEN FUND -_____—._._.- __._.___
00 /I4 ACD NND 11.40
/566 ACO FUND 69.160.1I _
' /1614 OPER FIRM B51 689.14 _
�n 470.45
r JT OPEN PINK, 752.470.45
gou 4,A16.7U3.
SELF 09 -
SELF FUNDED
UR WORNURSING
CAS COMP INSURANCE FUND 8.550.72
JT GIST 4XIRRING CAPITAL POND I86.147.41
"y 8 7.257.049.26In
-
-1
a -
110
...1 % FUND NO 9299 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/P9 RAGE I _
REPORT NUMBER AP43
G CLAIMS PAID U5124189 POSTING DATE 05/24/89
al
.I
0997SR ARM BUSINESS MACHINES $21.2G SERVICE AGREEMENT
A 099761 ADAMSON UNIFORM S EQUIP. 31,568.15 LAB SUPPLIES
099762 AIM PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL INC. $4,748.90 START-UP FEES "!
MI 099764 AMERICAN CHAIN A BEAR CO. S872.36 - PUMP PARTS
iA D 099769 AMERI I CH 3261.60 COPIER LEASES 1°I
�311781[—XEMIX DM 2— M
u RI 09976T THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 42,417.13 O'RINGS 6 GASKDTS
2 099768 BLACE PA ANDERSON $1,410.55 MEETING EXPENSE
f
nip 09977E ARAiEN SERVICES. MAC. i5A 791.8E UNIFORM RENTALS
I 099711 NICHOLAS ARMONTES $316.75 TRAINING 6 MEETING MMSB
ho 099773 ASSOCIATED BAG CO. 966.15 OPERATING SUPPLIES
bi 099774 B S K FRECISION $85.06 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
um U'pPFA 099776 BANK OF A r ICA NTSSA f$11.66 BANG CARDS
4� 1 199777 G.R. BARGY71 AND ASSOC. S5,610.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P2-33.34,32,37
n 095779 B. BATEMAN $575.00 DEFERRED CORP ➢ISTRIBOTIOM
ias f— 099780 BATTERIES NEST. INC. 34111.89 TRUCK PARTS
LAN 5UFFLLES
ty 0997k2 RC F:7 ENGINEERING. INC. $67.42 COMPRESSOR PARTS
Mo;•�-� 099703 BLACK BON CORP SS02.15 COMPUTER NARBWME
a �7 095T85 BONNEVILLE EQUIP.. INC. 54.790.06 CRANE SAFETY CERTIFICATES
D99786 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $137,699.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES 16-1
IPW1 . 0991tlP BUPRC ENGINEERING CO. 5152.71 ELECTRIC SNPPLI86
6.ICn 099189 PUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 51,827.UD LAND SURVEYING M.0.6-8-88
099791 C G R RECONDITIONING CO. 3390.00 MBCBARICAL PARTS
AA
099792 CS COMPANY $15.54 OXYGEN SUPPLIES �
'099796 CALIROL . INC. $809.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
A C99795 JOHN CAROLLP. CN61NEERS $196,494.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34,PI-20,J-I3 Mo
ni
099797 CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. $2.551.68 OIL 6 CREASE AN
D99198 CLARK CONSULTANTS $2.640.00 CONSULTING SERVICES AM
0f9bRV CUMGRCSSOR CGPFONLNTS OF CALIF 52,125.0E CARDS 6 CHAIN
095tl01 CONSOLIDATES LLECTPICAL DI 51. S6.552.1G ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
099B05 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $285.51 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
099804 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 51,086.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
s>IW
- vl A
r,
^j LG
FUND NO 919P - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/09 PAGE P `
REPORT NUMRFR AP43
CLAIMS PAID 95/24/89 POSTING DATE 05124/B9
099805 CAL WATER $312.32 RENTAL EQUIPMENT A�
099007 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $2,965.76 TI88S
099888 DEZURIK AND/DR CS Co. S3.953.23 VALVE PARTS
1.' 099810 DORP-OLIVER. INC. $049.79 MECHANICAL PARTS
E. 299811 O4C SEER IRO US TRIES. INC. f2.9T2.24 MECHANICAL PARTS
n Z 09961J •EASTMAN. INC. $9,935.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES ..I
D99814 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT S46.00 TBUCE PUTS
D
In 0996169E17 LTEQCRT COPP 62.70V.0G PIIEVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
09 ENGINEERING NEWS PECOPL $70.60 PUBLICATION
M.I fT 0l5619 JEFF ESSER $130.08 MILEAGE MUSE
� 1 3 099820 NARSHALL i11PRE5 q40.00 DEFERRED CXW DISTRIBUTION
w—LL�99581T DORM . . PALEE RSI[TIPYS. T.f.....a WNSIROCIIUN SEROICOR ]-1 FLJ 20
i 00 099622 FEDERAL EXPRESS CDRP. $336.00 AIR FREIGHT
m' 1 099823 FEPRELLGAS $29.25 PROPANE
•3a 099IT5 FISCHER A PORTER CO. $9,062.98 CNEORINAIION PARTS
s P"' 099826 FOUNTAIN VALLCY CAMERA $302.04 FILM
P.: C7 09902b FOUNTAIN VALLEY
Cv PAIk1 f724.20 PAINT SUPPLIES
pepe i--i 699A29 THE FOVBORO CO. S41348.57 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
la. W99831 FRUEHAUF DIVISION S12.405.87 TRUCK SWAIM •i'
p. 099R32 CITY OF FULLERTON $98.21 WATER USEAOE
6: H—I 09963 GIF.P LICH-KIT NCLL. INC. SI1 . PUMP PARTE
b•I 09963
5 J.X. GL AEC. I $5
0C. , 110 14.50 '[RAINING VIDEO
099831 VUST
GRAPHIC CONTROLS 4331.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
0998SP TONY GUTIERREZ $110.02 TRAINING MUSE
N
09940 FPLU A. HARPER f1.456.66 ME COMP DISTRIBUTION
I 099813 HATCH G MIRK, INC. $5.5)].a} MECHANICAL
AL PARTS
0 099843 HOLRBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. S507.95 COMPRESSOR PARTS
099844 DONALD D. HONOMICHL S300.V0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
Al
.11 099846 R.S. HUGHLS CO.. INC. $857.2G HARDWARE
LP 19SO47 CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH f14.31 WATER USEAGE w'
099b49 HYDROTEX $79461.13 TEST EQUIPMENT
09965C ENTERPRISE ENGINE DIV. $46.71 FREIGHT
tD
0 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/69 PAGE 3 `
REPORT NUMBER AP93
CLAIMS PAID 05/24/09 POSTING DATE 05/24/89
41
099B51 ISCO COMPANY SA•Jb6.00 W SUPPLIES
099E53 J A V SCIENTIFIC $479.66 LAB SUPPLIES x
099b54 RIVIERA FINANCE f301.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
MW SUM
099656 JONES 1 STOKES ASSOC...INC. 39.729.A0 CONSULTING SERVICES US 89-27
rah 099657 FAMA" BEARINGS f SUPPLY 3990.61 FITTINGS
yam 099859 KEENAN SUPPLY $1.134.03 VALVE PARTS
•� 099660 KING BEARING, INC. $2.000.16 NACRINE SUPPLIES
y
C99662 MARTIN KOROICK. SF $2.583.9E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-29.5-30 =
uI C95863 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 5185.54 CHEMICALS
n°Fri uv'bbqr
Pol3 099865 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY 3010.91 CYLINDER 6EPAIR3
C9
bb 9866 LIMITOROUE CORP. $1.082.84 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
y V4>TS7 X.J. LYNCF. C 5:6T 1Al1FTDF.I7S�01F LIES Iv.
6ab1
099868 MRC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL f585.6t OCEAN MONITORING - LAB SERVICES
�.d l 699869 IDS $6.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS
M>
099871 NS DATA SERVICE CORP. f127.20 DATA TRANSFERS
099872 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. $661.76 FILTER PRODUCTS
VMW
eF7 095074' MATT - C6LOF, IN[. 5373.1: CHLORINATION PARTS
099875 MCMASTFR-CARR SUFrLY CO, $80.41 SHARP SUPPLIES
6 095P77 MEDLIN CONPOLS CO. $102.83 GAUGE
6a 099878 MICROAGE COMPUTER $25.642.52 SOFTWARE/COMPUTERS
'W'.4 0956P v` MIDLAND MFG. CORP. • 1646.12 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
®N C99061 MIDLAND
LIPOFE ANO/OP VAT ERS f]29.16 LAB SUPPLIES
x
spa •C-9085 JAKES M. MOKTGOMERY S/2.628.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES - FOUL AIR SCRUBBERS •A
;a. 099bB9 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. 32.308.79 HARDWARE
BOOK XErLAVEMENI
6,; C996HE NATIONAL FEKCE RENTALS 3566.OS FENCING
095697 NATIONAL LUMBER 9530.16 MAKUWARE
r •099889 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $842.59 PIPE 6 FITTINGS x
099698 NEWARK ELECTRONICS S48.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS .o
t99 91 tlttiCiA[ 1 CIMi G lOES SI76 OC SUBSCRIFIFUN
ri9E 92 OLYPFIC CPr KTCAL CO. $13.677.46 CHLORINE M.O. LO-12-88
r.99893 POGEPT J. MEN $293.96 TWINING EXPENSE .
099895 ORANGC COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 3140.22 AUTONOTIVE PARTS
6, FITTINGS
C99696 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING [0. 3289.0
I
r
S FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 5/17/09 PAGE 0
REPORT NUMBED AP41
CLAIMS PAID 05/24/89 POSTING DATE 05/24/89
sI ;I
099897OSCPR•S LOOP A SAFE 5130.02 LOOK 6 KEYS
re
099899 COUNTY OF ORANGE i;6.100.00 DISPOSAL CATS PIES
699900 COUNTY OF ORANGE t10.000.00 CLAIM 57-66-78
m
0999" PACIF EC FARTS 11.96T.OY PUMP PARTS
nl� G99903 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 11.519.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES
' fTl 099905 PANEL CELLUL AP 373.50 CELLULAR TEtEP80NE SERVICES
11.1 O 099906 FARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $434.37 NECBANICAL PARTS I'^'
PO PYMBCPOr OFi 044p 00 0110(RYD-LO!@ OIlIRIIOTI[p p
09990b SAM W. PCTEASON S ASSOC. ST.170.93 ENGINlIRING SERVICES 2-11-3 lu-
i�qq 099909 PHOTO 9 SOUND CO. $381.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES
0:9 099911 PITNEY HOWES $126.00 SCALE REPAIR
I 099912 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $163.30 HARDWARE
y 09941
3
Pot+ I9 eR1C. 22,061. 3 GuIE.I.. ....TRES la
099910 FOLYFUPE. INC. $33,530.65 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-8-89
_.�. 1 09ggl5 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $312.58 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
pp 099917
TH"Ell
PROJECTS
SOLU 110N Co.
39.0 00.0us IdSTR@IRNTATIDN INSPECTION M.0.8-10-68
6+I rr 099910 PULSAFEEDEP 5081:G5 PUMP PARTS
19917 �URF7lTELR7A"T A"I" 9 FIRM P"
m.J 09992P QUALITY pUILDINI SUPPLY .90 AOILDIN 170G MATERIALS
P94921 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $744.56 TRASN DISPOSAL
099923 RED WING SHOES .180.03 SAFETY GROSS
J99424 REMEDY TEMP $1.136.4♦ THMORARY SERVICES
Oo99P
e926 TMF LIC SUPPLY CO. 51.210— PIPE 6 FITTINGS
095927 PICUH CORPCOR 3660.G.^ COPIER LEASES 771
099929 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. S211.305.50 CONSTRUCTION -7-4 .9
�• 09g930 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $331.66 ELECTRIC MOTOR n�
�9^931
.. P99532 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS. INC. i5.565.00 OFFICE MACHINE
P99933 SEA COAST OESIGAS A45.66 OFFICE REPAIRS lu.
•al 095939 $MI 1M A... 0 SOPPt7. T0C Y021T7Y--�IEOMBffiG .AFF EfI.
w 194935 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS S4I6.00 SOIL TESTING
099936 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY S7.667.00 PERMIT PEPS I'S
)37 SO COESI PIP 00 LIT. $5.000.00 PRTIPLI S33Ui
P 95938 SOUTHEPA CALIF. EDISON CO. $364.673.59 POWER m
W 099539 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $5.161.86 NATURAL GAS
099941 BP AP NLE?TS DPIMNIMG WATER 51.550:23 GRINNING WATER/COOLRR RENTAL
'wl - 099942 SPEC TECN WESTERN $332.84 WELDING SUPPLIES
I°3.'JO
i J �•
W
J LIT FUND NO 919- - JT FIST WORKING Cepi lAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/89 PAGE 5 `
REPORT NUXBEP 4P43
CLAIMS FAID 05/24/89 POSTING DATE 05/24/89 ai
099943 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYS TCMS. INC. $65.72 TOEING
y
099945 STAROW STEEL 9232.91 METAL
099946 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. $498.69 TOOLS
al 09994N SUMMIT STEEL • 12,871.77 MAL
099949 SUNSET FORD $15.01 TRUCK PARTS
u ITI 0999" THE SUPPLIERS $1,457.66 TOOLS/HARDWARE
.> Z 099952 SURVIVAIR $325.61 ANRIAL INSPECTION
'•�]7 099954 TAYLOR-DUNN SL73.24 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
P9.155 TECH-CCSSORIES $52.9p OFFICE SUPPLIES
,a fTl C99957 THERMO ANALYTICAL. INC./NOPCAL >A 2.00 LAB SERVICES
p� 3 099956 TILLINGHAST 51.100.30 CONSULTING SERVLC85
W
4a; 00 09946f. TRUCK L AUTO SUFFLV, INC. 3949.94 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
�.J 099561 J.G. TUCKER. A SON. INC. 56.875.16 ANALYZER PARTS
D 099963 UNITED PARCEL•SERVICE $482.74 PARCEL SBHVICES
a 1— 099964 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR $319.75 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
tv 099966 V4h SC]ENTI;IC 36.T22.79 LAE SUPPLIES
699967 VALLFY CITIES SUFFLV CO. $4.851.00 HARDWARE/PIITINGS
jn 099969 VISTA FAINT CORP. 9020.19 PAINT SUPPLIES
YELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE 52.716.59 SEMI" SERVICES
Ate, --I099972 YILLPAN ASSCCIATES $21.242.34 ENGIIA.ING SERVICES 2-26-2.2-27
C999T3 ROURKE 6 WOCDP16F $32.613.5f• LEGAL SERVICES M.O. 10-14-87
�- 099975 GEORGE YANDLEY ASSOCIATES $293 AO VALVE
„I 099976 ARTHUR YOUNG 55.993.00 PROPESSIONAL SERVICES-----------------
'
L
ya; TLitL CLAIMS PAID C5/24/85 31.719.936.5P
I�
a.l �
1 PUWO RD 9199 — 3Y DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/17/89 PAGE 6
C73 REPORT NMER AP43
COUMIY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAtHE PAID OS 24 POSTLNC GATE 0 4 89
1%
Y AMOUNT le
it OPER FOND i 4316.56 11°
.
02 F/R FORM2. .13
"
^I 03 OPER POD12.701]01.6666 I„
' B5 OPEN FUND 6,068.55
BS F/R POND 156.00
�6 o9eR mien _ M.01 _
I� 06 ACO FUND 8,145.69 k
r 06 F/R FUND 23,168.32 _
D9FR plron _,$.4 E2.R2
'F1l B7 AM FUND 21,688.91
B1 F/R FOND 287.24 _
9 H n9RR 91ND A�3R4.08
Q0 014 OPER POND 8.71
�a1 'B14 AOF PUNO 52,895.71
%'1 HR66 AIDR Phan — 2,680.70
�" 666 A/1R 6 IGIDFYVF AN 2,fi 35.70
42
8667 OPEB POND 35.42 °
17
Pla
2.781.
lT OPER FUND 6.257.06
525.145.87
— la•
�JT WORI[INGOCAPITAL POND 158,233.32
is
1% M'
M,
n;
4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
0 ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORN"
10644 eU5 AN NUE
va.BOX 0127 v
FOUWWNVN Y.0 UFOWX 92725d+27
n+41962z4n
May 24, 1989
MEMORANDUM
TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
FM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager
RE: PURCHASE OF TWENTY-SIX ( 26) FOUR WHEEL ELECTRIC CARGO CARRIERS,
SPECIFICATION NO. A-145
Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday, April 4, 1989 for the purchase of
twenty-six ( 26) four wheel electric cargo carriers. Tabulation of
bids is as follows:
BID PRICES
DEALER UNIT TOTAL
1. W. T. Hillard, Inc. $4,470.00 $116,220.00
Santa Fe Springs, CA
2. Taylor-Dunn Mfg. 5,161.90 134,209.40
Anaheim, CA
3. Karrior Mfg. Co. 5,549.00 152,930.44
Gardena, CA
It is recommended the award for Purchase of Twenty-Six ( 26) Four
Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers be made to W.T. Hillard, Inc. , lowest
responsible bidder, in the amount of $116,220.00, plus sales tax.
Ted Hoffman,
Purchasing Manager
"C-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1"
Purchase of Twenty-Six Four Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers,
Specification No. A-145
Page 2
We herebyconcur with the foregoing recommendation:
/�+�+"�
ary G. treed,
lh of A inistrative Assistant and
Acting Director of Finance
✓/� . .
W �6`U.vi"'�
William N. Clarke,
General Superintendent
TN:sw
"C-2" AGENDA ITEM k9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORM"
19BAAEUUS AVENUE I�
PO BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9212E-6121
41141 SV4411
May 22, 1989
MEMORANDUM
TO: Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
via: Gary Streed, Chief Administrative Assistant and
Acting Director of Finance
FM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager
RE: PURCHASE OF ONE, 2 1/2 TON CRANE-MOUNTED, FLAT BED
TRUCK,
SPECIFICATION NO. A-147
Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, May 16, 1989, for the purchase
of One, 2 1/2 Ton, Crane-Mounted, Flat Bed Truck. Tabulation of
bids is as follows:
Dealer Bid Price
1. Ole Lee, Inc. $39,842
El Monte
2. Allen GMC 40,000
Laguna Niguel
3. Morgan Crane 41,945
Santa Ana
4. GMC Truck Division 43 ,432
Santa Fe Springs
"D-1" AGENDA ITEM N9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1"
a
Page 2
Specification No. A-147
It is recommended the award for purchase of One, 2 1/2 Ton,
Crane-Mounted, Flat Bed Truck be made to Ole Lee, Inc. of El
Monte, CA, lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of
$39,842.00, plus sales tax. Sufficient funds have been budgeted
for this
purchase.
Ted Hof
Purchasing Manager
We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendation.
ry G. treed,
C ief Aftinistrative Assistant and
Acct]i�ngg Director of Finance
W // / /u_
William D . Clarke,
General Superintendent
TH:sw
"D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS ^D-2"
a
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Ei (8)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE uneht
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Ded*") S 29,180.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 FLAGPOLE ILLUMINATION ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to add two direct burial sealed light fixtures with
associated conduit and wiring far illumination of two flagpoles adjacent to the
east side of the New South Wing. The illumination of the flagpoles was suggested
by the project architect in order to have the flags flying continuously on a
24-hour basis resulting in a daily labor savings to the Districts of raising and
lowering the flags. The flagpole lighting was not shown on the contract drawings
or included in the contract specifications. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference
PCH #26)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 2,800.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 ADDITIONAL PIPE SUPPORTS
The Contractor was directed to install additional pipe supports to span four roof
truss joists in order to provide more support for the 6-inch chilled water piping
running in the ceiling of Room No. 120. This change was required by the project
architect and structural engineer to provide additional support for the HVAC
piping. The pipe supports were not shown on the contract drawings. This work was
negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference FCO #30)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 331.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Ei ht (8)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE une 989
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4
Item 3 HOT WATER HEATER CIRCUIT ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to install a 480 volt hat water heater circuit for the
new water heater in Kitchen No. 111. Due to the limited capacity of the
electrical panels in Room No. 104, it was necessary to run the circuit across the
building to Room No. 130. This change was requested by the Districts in order to
provide power for the hot water heater. Also included in this change are the
addition of two map light receptacles in the Board Room. The circuits were not
shown on the contract drawings or included in the contract specifications. This
work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #35)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,979.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 PLASTER SCREED ADDITIONS
The Contractor was directed to use aluminum vertical plaster expansion joint
screeds for all the vertical plaster joints in both the existing Administration
Building and new South Wing. The contract specifications called for a plastic
vertical screed which is no longer manufactured and the project architect
requested the use of aluminum vertical screed material to match the contract
specified aluminum horizontal screed. Also included in this change is the
installation of additional aluminum drip molding in the soffits and J-molding
around all the doors and windows. This molding was not shown on the contract
plans or included in the contract specifications. The additional molding was
necessary to provide a finished plaster edge around the doors and windows and was
requested by the project architect. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section
10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #43)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 11,110.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 6'
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO.Eight (8)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO: J-7-4
Item 5 CEILING JOIST REWORK
The Contractor was directed to reframe the ceiling in Room No. 108 in order to
provide clearance for heating and ventilating ductwork. The framing modification
was requested by the Districts as the mechanical subcontractor was not able to
install the required ductwork with the ceiling framed as shown on the contract
drawings. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO #33)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 813.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 6 KITCHEN ELECTRICAL ADDITIONS
The Contractor was directed to add additional convenience outlets, circuit
breakers, conduit and wiring for the new appliances to be installed in Kitchen
Nos. 111 and 146. This change was requested by the Districts to supply power for
the additional kitchen appliances selected by the Districts and specified by the
project architect. The additional circuitry was not shown on the contract plans
or included in the contract specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH #28)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,287.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 7 SHEARWALL PENETRATION REINFORCEMENT
The Contractor was directed to reinforce shear panel walls in Room Nos. 103 and
107 where they are penetrated by heating and ventilating ductwork. This change
was required by the project structural engineer to insure the integrity of the
shear walls to provide restraint for building lateral loads. Reinforcement
details were not shown on the contract drawings. This work was negotiated
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #32)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 862.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day
"E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
�i FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. E1 ht (8)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE une 9
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4
Item 8 KITCHEN RANGE HOOD VENT DUCTS
The Contractor was directed to install ventilation ducting from the kitchen range
hoods up through the roof of the new South Wing. The ducting was requested by the
project architect to provide ventilation for cooking equipment in Kitchen Nos. 111
and 146. The ventilation ducting was not shown on the contract drawings or
included in the contract specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #44)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,214.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 9 FURRING STRIP ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to add furring strips on interior and exterior walls
in a number of locations on the New South Wing. The furring strips were requested
by the project architect in order to provide a continuous surface for installation
of stucco or drywall where plywood shear panels are discontinuous in a straight
wall line. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #36)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 630.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 10 BATHROOM SOFFIT ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to add three soffits over the lavatory countertops in
Bathroom Nos. 113, 116 and 118. This change was requested by the Districts and
the project architect and includes the soffit framing, drywall, painting and
installation of nine additional light fixtures with associated conduit and wiring.
The bathroom soffits were not shown on the contract drawings and were not included
in the contract specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)2(8) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH #29 and #29A)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,577.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
"E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS .,E-4^
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. E 19
ht (8)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE une 14, 1989
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4
Item 11 CHILLER PIPING VALVE ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install two 4-inch gate valves on the
chilled water supply and return lines and two 2-inch gate valves on the hot water
supply and return lines where the lines enter the existing Administration
Building. The valves were requested by the project mechanical engineer in order
to connect chiller piping to the existing Administration Building without shutting
down and draining the system which will be in operation serving the new South
Wing. These valves were not shown on the contract drawings or included in the
contract specifications. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B)
of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO d37)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,577.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 29,180.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 12 Calendar Days
The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Changes
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 12 days extension of time to
perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor
agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime
work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime
work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Items 1 - 11
above constitute full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by
the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
"E-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-5"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92798
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Eight (8)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION JOB NO. J-7-4
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date July 11, 1988
Original Contract Time 602 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date March 4, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 12 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 31 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 633 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date April 4, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 3 549 000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0
This Change (Add) WeAuet) $
Amended Contract Price $ 3,737,'959.00
Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
4k'p- gz /.'?
on ruction manager CiiEe
J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION
i
ACCEPTED/BY: APPROV 3Y:
Contractor Date i or o ngineen ng Date
"E-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-6"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �J
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER -
C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16)
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC. DATE June
JOB: L AT PLA N N -
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (8eduet:) $ 36,700.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - ACCOMMODATIONS FOR HANDICAPPED PERSONS
The contract drawings and specifications did not provide toilets and showers in
the men's and women's restrooms to meet Title 24, State of California Building
Standards, for handicapped persons. The Contractor was instructed to modify
showers that included framework .and tile in lieu of standard molded plastic stalls
along with seats, grab bars and special lighting. Alterations were also required
to the toilets and their fixtures. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section
10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 40, 40A and 408).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,815.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - INSTALL PLATFORM CLOSURE
A 6-inch opening between the north-south walkway on the top of the pipe pit and
the east side of the pump station at the east man-door was considered a possible
safety hazard. A special section of walkway was fabricated and placed in the
opening. This work was accomplished by Contractor' s force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)28 of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 534.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 3 - UTILITY ROOM PIPING
The contract drawings created an interference problem in the utility room. The
water piping as designed would block the access door to the room and a sanitary
sewer drain blocked access for placement of the heat pump. The Contractor was
instructed to move the piping and provide a new location for the janitor's sink
and the access door. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2A of
the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 078).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 968.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
Via.✓ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16)
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC. DATE June 14 989
JOB: AT PLA NT
Item 4 - MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS TO WALKWAYS AND LADDERS
The contract drawings provided various interferences with ladders, walkways and
electrical fixtures. The Contractor was directed to perform the following work.
a. Relocate a light fixture at the north end of the pipe pit that interfered with
bulkhead storage rack.
b. Modify walkway support by removing a section of the stainless steel angle that
interfered with bulkheads stored in rack at north end of pipe pit.
c. Modify six pipe pit ladders and handrail connections by adding 3x3 aluminum
angles on side rail in order for ladders to conform to OSHA standards.
d. Relocate electrical switches at the top of each pipe pit ladder due to ladder
modifications.
e. Modify bridge crane access ladder and cage that interfered with corbel support
of bridge crane runway at southeast corner of building.
f. Add an additional neoprene rubber seal on bottom of Bulkhead No. 1 due to
insufficient sealing as designed.
This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b)2B of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 080)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,364.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 - HANDRAIL AT TERMINATION CHANNEL
When the Rothrock Pump Station Building was demolished, the south side of the
termination channel was left open creating a hazardous condition to personnel .
The Contractor was instructed to install 25 feet of aluminum handrail . This work
was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions.
(Reference PCH 087)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,014.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE 1 /
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16)
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC. un DATE Je 989
JOB: N L N AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB
Item 6 - MODIFY ROOF SLOPE
The contract drawings did not provide for proper drainage of the northwest corner
of the roof due to the personnel access hatch causing a damming condition. The
Contractor was instructed to build up the roof two inches to channel water to the
roof drains. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2A of the
General Provisions. (Reference PCH 096)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,081.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 7 - INSTALL GROUNDING FOR COMPUTER AND REPLACE CURRENT BREAKERS FOR SUMP
PUMPS
The contract drawings and specifications did not provide for a separate grounding
system for the booster plants DACS (Data Accumulated Control System) computer
control system which is required to protect the equipment. Also, the wiring and
breakers were designed undersize for the 7} H.P. sump pump motors. The Contractor
was instructed to install the grounding system and replace the wiring and breakers
to meet the electical requirements. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section
10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 097A)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,398.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days
Item 8 - CLEAR UNKNOWN UNDERGROUND OBSTRUCTIONS
During the pile driving operations for the 120-inch outfall pipe supports ES-1 and
AB-1 at the Rothrock Pump Station, underground obstructions of abandoned pipe and
concrete footings were encountered that were not shown on the plans. This caused
the Contractor delay and additional costs in repositioning piling for driving or
excavating and removing the obstructions. This work was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2B of the General
Provisions. (Reference Claim ES-1 and AB-I)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,093.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS 7-3-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16)
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC. DATE une 4, 989
JOB: AT PLA
Item 9 - INSTALL AIR DRYER
The contract drawings and specifications did not provide for an air dryer in the
pneumatically operated variable air volume dampers in the Booster Station. The
addition of the air dryers provides for a more efficient operation and reduced
maintenance. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)2B of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 084)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,663.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 10 - INSTALL ACOUSTICAL PANELING
The contract drawings did not provide for acoustical paneling at the future
doorway to the future Cogeneration Building located in the west wall of the
basement in the booster station. Because the new building is not scheduled for
completion for at least two years, it was determined that the door area should be
covered with acoustical paneling as is the entire west wall. This work was
negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions. (Reference
PCH 089)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 449.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 11 - REVISE GRATING FASTENERS
The Contractor was instructed to provide a fastener called "rivnuts" that would
replace ordinary bolts and nuts and therefore facilitate grating removal for
servicing the motor components. This work was negotiated pursuant to Section
10-6(b)2A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 098)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 321.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 36,700.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 7 Calendar Days
The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Changes
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 7 days' extension of time to
perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor
agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime
work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime
work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Items 1
through 11 above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts
incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or con-
sequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by
Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
"F-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS 7-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �f
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Sixteen (16)
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC. DATEJune 989
JOB: E N OU L OST R TATION ' " AT PLA N 0 Nu. - 5
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date July 20, 1987
Original Contract Time 940 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date February 13, 1990
Time Extension This C.O. 7 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 74 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 1014 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date April 28, 1990
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $18,476 243.00
Prev. Auth. Changes T--98,502.79
This Change (Add) (Deduct) 700-06
Amended Contract Price 9,0 5. 9
Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
'p- C-6- P
Construction Manager Date
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
ACCEPTED BY: APPROV BY:
R�sb UbM DeLl
Co tr for to it ctor of Engineering Date
"F-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-5"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
�i P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 989
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB N . J-20
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduet) $ 30,857.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - WATER FACILITIES INSPECTION TRENCH MODIFICATION
The Contractor was directed to do additional work on the Districts' water
facilities inspection trench along the north side of the New North Road from the
Districts' west property line to the new main entrance to Plant No. 1. This work
included increasing the depth of the inspection trench from three feet to five
feet, adding an additional 600 linear feet of trench and potholing and locating
four known water lines crossing the New North Road in order to provide inspection
by City of Fountain Valley water personnel. These changes were requested by the
City of Fountain Valley in order to provide better verification of existing city
water system pipelines crossing the New North Road into the Plant 1 treatment
facility complex. This additional work was not shown on the contract drawings nor
included in the contract specifications. This item of work was accomplished on a
time and material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #2).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 10,529.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 14 Calendar Days
Item 2 - REMOVAL OF UNSUITABLE SOIL UNDER BUILDINGS 5 AND 6
The Contractor was directed to remove and dispose of an additional two feet of
unsuitable oversaturated clay sail material from under the building pads of
Buildings 5 and 6. The removal was directed by the Districts' Soils Consultant in
order to provide a stable pad for construction of the buildings. This item
also includes an additional foot of overexcavation at the east end of Building 6
In order to remove unsuitable sail. The contract plans or specifications did not
include this additional work. This item of work was accomplished on a time and
material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO-#5)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 20,328.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 5 Calendar Days
�.../ TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 30,857.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 19 Calendar Days
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3'
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Changes
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 19 days extension of time to
perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor
agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime
work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime
work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Items 1
and 2 above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts
incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred
by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date February 27, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date October 25, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 19 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 19 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 259 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date November 13, 1989
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 3,266,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes S U
This Change (Add) (9edu6t) S— JU'Sb/.UU
Amended Contract Price S ,296! 8
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts DATE June
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
B
Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMM iDED BY:
o_ c--89
ons ruc ion Manager ate
J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION
ACCEPT , BY, o ,% A R D BY:
on ractor ate irec or of Engl"neering ate
"G-3.. AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS
"G-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 I
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �J
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Ei hteen (18)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 4, 1989
JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. P1-20; AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS
N
PAVLNUFLANI NU. i, JOB NO. PI-31
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 82,028.20
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Job No. P1-20
Item 1 CONCRETE OBSTRUCTION AT MIDDLE ROAD
The Contractor was directed to remove a concrete obstruction at the Middle Road.
The existing concrete obstruction was not shown on the contract plans and
conflicted with the installation of the Middle Road. This item was accomplished
by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General
Provisons. (Reference FCO # 128)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,967.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 CONCRETE OBSTRUCTION AT PAVING AREA NEAR POWER BUILDING 3A
The Contractor was directed to remove a concrete obstruction at the area paving
between Power Building 3A and the Middle Road. The existing concrete obstruction
was not shown on the contract plans and conflicted with the finished asphalt
paving grades. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant
to Section 10-6(b)(2)8 of the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #130)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,296.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Eighteen (18)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE une 4, 98
JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. P1-20; AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS
D L M N L N AND N N
FAVINb Al L N
Job No. P1-20
Item 3 TEMPORARY ASPHALT PAVING REMOVAL
The Contractor was directed to remove a section of temporary asphalt paving on
the North Perimeter Road. The P1-20 contract construction schedule calls for the
installation of the North Road in two phases. The temporary paving was installed
on the North Road in between the two phases by another contractor to maintain
access to the existing main entrance. The temporary paving needed to be removed
,just before the installation of the second phase of the North Road permanent
paving and was not shown on the contract plans. This item was negotiated with
the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons.
(Reference FCO #127)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,652.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 ADDITIONAL CHLORINE PIPE AT BAR SCREEN CHANNELS
The Contractor was directed to install additional chlorine piping in bar screen
channel numbers 3 and 4. These channels are designated for future flows. The
contract drawings do not include chlorine piping in the referenced channels.
Installing the additional piping now would result in a safer working area and
eliminate the need for an extensive plant shut down in the future due to the
orientation of the operating channels. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons.
(Reference FCO #135)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,550.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS °H-2^
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Ei hteen (18)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Company DATE une 8
JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1 JOB N0. P1-20• AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS
NO AN • RE LACEMENT 0 BOILE IPING LE NOUTS; ND G ADIN AN
Job No. P1-20
Item 5 INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL INFLUENT PUMP
The Contractor was directed to install a Districts-furnished influent pump on a
pump pad in the pump room. This pump will be stored at this location and will
not be connected electrically or mechanically to the new influent pumping system.
The extra costs involved in this item include new sole plates, blind flange
bolts, pump installation and painting, and modifications to the existing testing
pipe. The storage of this future pump, actually in its designed location at thi3
time, was found to be cost effective and eliminated the need of multiple
relocations due to the ongoing rehabilitation project to the existing Warehouse.
The contract plans did not include the installation of this future pump. This
item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the
General Provisons. (Reference PCH #78, FCO #118)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,364.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 6 REINFORCEMENT MODIFICATIONS AT TUNNEL NO. 4
The Contractor was directed to modify the steel reinforcement in Tunnel No. 4 at
the bar screen and pump room structures. The structural section specified for
Tunnel No. 4 in the contract plans was in error and needed modification to
satisfy design loading criteria. These modifications involved additional
reinforcement for tunnel walls and decks. Also, a conflict existed with the pump
room exterior counterforts and Tunnel No. 4 walls and decks. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisons. (Reference PCH #64, FCO #86)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,079.20
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Ei hteen (18)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 4, 9
JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1 JOB N0. P1-20• AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS
RE EM IN N A N N
Job No. P1-20
Item 7 REMOVABLE WALL PANELS AT CHLORINE BUILDING
The Contractor was directed to modify the walls in front of the bulk chlorine
storage tank facility at the Chlorine Building. The walls were modified to be
easily removable to accommodate the future addition or removal of bulk chlorine
storage tanks. The modifications included additional wall steel reinforcing, new
support angles and new lifting eyes. These modifications were not part of the
original contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons. (Reference FCO #111, PCH #73)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,997.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 8 ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE FINISH MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to modify the finish to the exterior concrete
surfaces exposed to view throughout the job site. An architectural finish
consisting of sand and cement will be applied to non-fluted concrete surfaces
in lieu of the specified sandblast finish. Upon review of a test panel of the
specified sandblast finish, it was determined to change the finish requirement to
a smooth, flat finish. This item also includes the costs for modifying the
concrete finish of all fluted surfaces. The fluted surfaces will then match the
above-mentioned architectural finish. The Contractor was also directed to
provide a similar architectural finish to the existing Metering and Diversion
(M&D) Structure's concrete walls. The specifications do not require fluted
concrete or the existing M&D structure to receive any special architectural
concrete finish. These modifications will attain the desired harmonious
architectural finish to all concrete exposed to view. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisons.
(Reference PCH #89, FCO #141)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 42,123.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM; 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 82,028.20
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extension to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
"H-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE v
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Ei hteen (18)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE une 4, 9
JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. P1-20; AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS
L L N A DN AN
FAVINb AlN
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date October 21, 1987
Original Contract Time 920 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date April 27, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 63 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 983 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date June 29, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 31111 110.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1:6 3'614 91
This Change (Add) (Aed"4) $SF-
Amended Contract Price $ 33, 3,643.1
Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
KIEWIT PACIFIC CO ` Q 9—/-87
o truction . anager Date
ACCEPTED BY:
APP E BY: 0on ractor ate Director of Engineering ate
"H-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-5"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE June
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
SYSTEM A PLANT N0. 1 JOB N0. P -2 ; C R FOR RIMARY B SIN Al PLANT
NO. 2. juts NO. FZ-jZ; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEMS AT PLANT N . 2 JOB N .
N L N L
B
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Beduet) S 98,811.72
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Job No. P2-33
Item 1 - ADDED CAUSTIC PUMP CIRCUITS
According to the contract documents, power to operate the caustic feed pumps at
each of the three scrubber complexes was to be provided in each of the three
scrubber control panels. Power and control circuitry in the scrubber control
panels was, in each case, inadequate to service the electrical load created by
the caustic feed pumps during the operation of a scrubber complex. New power
panels, control panels and additional wiring will be furnished and installed to
provide ample power to operate the caustic feed pumps. Work will be performed
on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
At the time the conflict was uncovered the scrubber control panels were
fabricated and installed at each of the scrubber complexes and the Contractor
was in the process of scheduling and coordinating equipment start-up activities.
The long lead time for delivery of the electrical equipment required to execute
the change work delayed the start of equipment testing.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 55,387.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 51 Calendar Days
Item 2 DELAY IN START OF "H and "I" SCRUBBER MODIFICATIONS
The contract requires the Contractor to modify existing foul air scrubbers "H"
and "I." Specifications for the modification work limit the Contractor to
working an one of the scrubbers at a time so that one scrubber remains in
operation at all times. The Contractor planned to perform the scrubber work at
an appropriate time prior to the completion of the North Scrubber Complex.
During a meeting that was held to discuss procedures for the modification work,
the Contractor was advised by staff that he could not start the "H" and "I"
"I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE June
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT N0. 1 JOB N0. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
N - N
2 8 -3 • UL AE SYSTEMS AT PLAN N N .
- 3; N MPR EME TO LI B" BILLIN NN AND
DISTRIBUTION TR TU E "A", JOB NO. P2-T4—.-
scrubber modifications until after the North Scrubber Complex was operating on a
permanent basis. Placing the North Scrubber Complex into permanent operation is
a critical path activity. Performing the "H" and "I" scrubber modifications
after the North Scrubber Complex completion will extend the contract for the
duration of the "H" and "I" work.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 22,750.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 70 Calendar Days
Job No. P2-34
Item 3 STEAM SHUNT PIPING CHANGES
The schematic diagrams in the plans and the written portion of the detailed
specifications provided the design for the steam shunt piping for thirteen
digesters at Plant No. 2. The locations selected by the Engineer for the entry
of "shunted" heated sludge piping into the various digesters was not consistant
with the locations selected by the staff. This change order item provides for
the changes to the original routing and connection points of the steam shunt
piping systems. Work has been performed on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13,839.98
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 ADDED ASPHALTIC CONCRETE CURB AND TRENCH PAVING
The curb and paving provided by this item is work that was added to the scope of
the original contract. The curb was placed by the Contractor at the request of
the Districts to protect the new landscaping along the Bushard entry road to the
east of the Construction Management trailers. In addition, the Maintenance
Department installed a new underground city water line between Harris Tunnel and
the Plant No. 2 Warehouse. The resulting trench was paved by the Contractor at
the request of the Districts. Work was performed on a direct cost plus percentage/
basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,834.74
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"1-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "1-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE June 14, 89
Zurn Constructors, nc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
SYSTEM AT N N N PRI R N L N
WE . OUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEMS AT PLAN N .
N AN
DISTRIBUTION U U DB N . FZ-34.
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: S 98,811.72
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 121 Calendar Days
The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract Time-made by this and all previously issued Changes
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 121 days' extension of time to
perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor
agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime
work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime
work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Items
1 through 4 above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the
impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental
or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be
incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change
Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract ate November 24, 1987
Original Contract Time 540 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date May 16, 1989
Time Extension This C.O. 121 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 121 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 661 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date September 14, 1989
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price S 15,893,393.00
Prev. Auth.Changes $ 9 '
This Change (Add) (Deduct) S I'72
Amended Contract Price $ 19,951,432.34
"I-3" AGENDA ITEM ##9(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE v
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE June
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS Al PLANT N0. 1 JOB NO. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
M A l NT B N - 6; KS FOR PRIMARY ASINS AT PLANT
JOB NO. P -• UL AIR SCRUBOER SYSTEMSPLANT
N
DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE A NO.
Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
tion Manager Uate
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF
ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
ACCEPTED BY: ;APPZRDBY:
wapt /.Q 1aractor — hteate rector of Engineering Date
"I-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE June 14. 1989
Zurn onstructors, nc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
SYSTEM AT PLANT NJOB NO. P - ; COVERS FOR RIMARY BASINS AT PLANT
PLAN] N
L NN LANU
�B A-, J B P -34.
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduet) $ 96,311.08
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Job No. P1-26
Item 1 PLANT NO. 1 SCRUBBER COMPLEX DRAIN CHANGES
The existing 12-inch drain line that was to be utilized by the Odor Control
Contractor for the Plant No. 1 Scrubber Complex Drain System was not in the
location shown on the drawings. The line was partially encased in concrete and
was provided with a concrete thrust block. Neither of these conditions were
addressed on the plans. This change order item provides for the removal of
concrete and for the realignment of the 12-inch drain. Work was performed on a
direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 866.21
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 PROVIDE CONCRETE PAD AT PLANT NO. 1, POWER BUILDING 4 DIESEL TANK FILL
BOXES
The fill boxes as originally placed were set in asphaltic concrete paving. Diesel
spills during the process of placing fuel in the underground tanks deteriorated
the paving. This change order item provides for the removal of the existing
asphaltic paving and for the construction of a new reinforced concrete pad to take
its place. Work was performed on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,495.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4�
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE June 9
urn Constructors, nc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB N0. P1-25• FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
SYSitM Ai PLANT NO. XB LAN
N L BLLN ANU
N NU.
Job No. P2-33
Item 3 MODIFICATIONS TO FOUL AIR DUCTWORK AT HEADWORKS "C"
At the time the P2-33 FRP Foul Air Ductwork system for Headworks "C" was designed,
the plans for the construction of the P2-37 Conveyor Building were not available
to the P2-33 designer. The 54-inch round FRP system as originally designed would
have passed horizontally through the roof section and parapet walls of the new
P2-37 Conveyor Building. To eliminate the conflict with the new structure and to
minimize the height of the new foul air ductwork, the line was designed to pass
through the new Conveyor Building ,just under the roof and between the new roof
trusses. The ductwork was changed for 54-inch round FRP to 36-inch by 70-inch
balsa core ductwork.
In addition, this item provides for the removal of the abandoned 72-inch exhaust
stack at Headworks "C", inclusion of a roof hatch to cover the 72-inch roof
opening and for a 72-inch cover plate to cover the opening in grade floor where
the stack once existed. The cost of the added work associated with this change
was negotiated with the Contractor. Work will be performed on a lump sum basis
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 60,577.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 METHANE SENSORS FOR CIRCULAR PRIMARY CLARIFIERS
The Contractor was directed to install methane sensors (gas detection sensors) in
each dome enclosure (17 domes) . Specifications for the sensors were not included
in the specifications. The sensors were provided in accordance with Section
10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 25,855.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE June
urn onstructors, nc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
SYSTEM AT PLAN N JOB NO. . CO PRIMARY BASINS AT L T
L N . B N .
FZ N BL NL AN
U JBN
Item 5 RELOCATION OF 10-INCH DIGESTER CLEANING LINE
The existing 10-inch digester cleaning line that is routed through the plant
tunnel system leaves the tunnels through the east wall of the Carney Tunnel
Extension and runs easterly in the underground to the sludge drying beds. New
underground Foul Air Line "A" was shown on the plans to have the same general
alignment as the 10-inch sludge line. The resulting conflict: was eliminated by
re-routing the 10-inch line around the new 48-inch foul air line. Work was
performed on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B
of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,517.87
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 96,311.08
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
revisions to the Contract Time made by this and any previously issued Change
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this
Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or
expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
"J-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. 40. Fourteen (14)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE one
urn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB N0. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER
SYSTEM AT PLA�T N9.;1N -
UUL AIK bLKUbk5LK NYSILM Al FLANIN N .
--ff1,—ffT1CrffGT-TUffN-ET AND
N STRUCTURE "A", JOB N -34.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Da-Fe— November 24, 1987
Original Contract Time 540 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date May 16, 1989
Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 121 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 661 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date September 14, 1989
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 15 893,393.00
Prev. Auth.Changes $
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 9b'3T1. OB
Amended Contract Price $Z6,b3Yd3.42
Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
4;�'? a-/a,
onstruction Manager Uate
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF
ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
ACCEPTED BY: APPR VET BY:
T�Qfra or a e/ irec or of •ngineering a e
"J-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: ENTRANCES, SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1
JOB NO.
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $26,462.14
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 FENCING MODIFICATION
The Contractor was directed to install six stands of "V"-type barbed wire on top
of the fencing at the east property line. The plans specified a 45 degree angle
with three strands of barbed wire which is not consistent with Districts' new
fencing standards. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #9)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 667.75
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 MANHOLE ADJUSTMENT
The Contractor was directed to adjust the Newhope trunk line manhole to grade in
preparation for new paving in the area. The manhole was located in the new east
perimeter roadway and was not shown on the the contract drawings. The manhole had
a PVC liner which needed repairs after the adjustment was performed. This item
was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO #13)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,199.41
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 3 RELOCATION OF TELEPHONE CONDUIT
The Contractor was directed to install approximately 250 feet of 2-inch PVC
conduit for telephone lines at the new main entrance roadway. The original
telephone service conduit was not shown to be relocated on the contract plans and
conflicted with new area paving at the new entrance. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #14)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,080.50
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June
JOB: ENTRANCES SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1
B0.
Item 4 MANHOLE SECTION REPLACEMENT
The Contractor was directed to replace the manhole flat top section of the
existing Ellis Avenue manhole located at the new main entrance. The flat top
section conflicted with new paving grades as shown on the contract plans. Upon
investigation, the existing manhole section was badly deteriorated and it was
decided to replace it. The new manhole section was polyurethane coated to prevent
future deterioration. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 9,218.46
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 THRUST BLOCK ADDITION _
The Contractor was directed to install a concrete thrust block on the 8-inch DIP
waste hauler drain line near the Metering and Diversion Structure. The drain line
was originally designed as a gravity line. It was decided during the construction
stages of the project to change the design of the drain line to a force main due
to the amount of solids in the flow and possible pipe slope problems. This change
required the re-excavation of this line and the installation of a concrete thrust
block at a fitting approximately 10 feet below finished grade. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) MA of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO #16)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 1,109.02
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 6 RESTROOM ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a new restroom facility and
attach it to the contract-specified guard shack at the new main entrance. It was
determined that a restroom was needed at the guard shack and it was not provided
for in the contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH N7)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 20,852.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"K-2" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: ENTRANCES SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1,
No.
Item 7 MCC DELETION
The Contractor was directed to delete the Motor Control Center (MCC) "U" in the
Metering and Diversion Structure. An MCC unit is being installed in another
project in the same location and it was determined to be more feasible to extend
this MCC in lieu of installing an MCC "U". This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH #1)
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 4,400.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 8 WASTE HAULER DUMP STATION DELETIONS
The Contractor was directed to delete and modify asphalt paving, concrete and
piping at the Waste Hauler Dump Station. During construction of the project, it
was determined that modifications were required to the waste hauler dump drains.
These modifications were needed to satisfy the sampling requirements of the
Districts' Industrial Waste Department. It was determined to be more cost
effective to perform the modifications in a future project. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General
Provisions. (Reference: PCH p8)
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 3,265.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 26,462.14
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
K-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 `
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �..r
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: ENTRANCES SITE SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date November 10, 1988
Original Contract Time 250 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date July 17, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days _
Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 250 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date July 17, 1989
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 1 590 000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $�I5,7�5)
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 14
Amended Contract Price $ 4
Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOM MH DED BY:
�& �-/-a9
ons ruc ion Manager Date
KIEWIT PACIFIC CO.
ACCEPTED BY: APPRO/V)�O BY:
ntract r ate Director of Lngineering liateW
"K-4" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
AN NO.
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dedu6t) $ 33,600.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item No. 1 - RE-ROUTE EXISTING UTILITIES AT NEW METER "A" STRUCTURE
During the initial excavation for the placement of shoring for and the
construction of new meter "A" structure, the Contractor uncovered an existing
natural gas line and an existing city water line. Both of the existing utilities
were in direct conflict with the shoring system and the new reinforced concrete
meter box. The two utilities were not shown on the plans and had to be re-routed
around the new meter box construction area. Work was performed on a direct cost
plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)8 of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,006.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item No. 2 - CHANGES TO NEW CONTAINMENT FACILITY AT DEWATERING
Details for the construction of the 2-foot, 6-inch high north wall of the new
containment structure at the existing dewatering building created a 3-inch void
between the two structures. In addition to the problem of forming and stripping
the 3-inch void, the void itself would have become a collector of debris and
chemically laden wash-down water. Modification of the details provided for the
wall to be capped to eliminate the void and to still maintain separation of the
two concrete structures. In addition to the wall detail change, the means that
were to be utilized by the Contractor to build a bulkhead in the containment area
utility trench was also changed. Details of the trench bulkhead indicated that
only one existing chemical line would pass through the new bulkhead but there were
two existing chemical lines (one insulated) and three existing electrical
conduits. Due to the existence of the additional lines, details were provided for
a grouted bulkhead in lieu of the concrete specified. Work was performed on a
direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General
Provisions.
��- ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,243.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"L-1'" AGENDA ITEM #9( j ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5'
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-37
Item No. 3 - CHANGE TYPE FRESH AIR FAN AT NEW CONVEYOR BUILDING
The fresh air fan specified for installation at the new conveyor building was to
be a galvanized steel unit. Due to the highly corrosive atmosphere at the
location of fan installation, immediately north of Headworks "C", staff determined
that a fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) type fan should be installed.
Additional cost for this change was calculated on a lump sum basis pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 869.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item No. 4 - INCREASE SIZE - PLUG VALVES AND KNIFE GATES FOR DIGESTERS "A" AND "B"
Plans for the replacement of existing ball valves and for the installation of new
knife gates indicated that all new valves were to be 6-inch. The size of existing
piping associated with the installation of new valves was actually 8-inch. The
6-inch size valves were approved and delivered to the site. This change order
item provides for the increase in valve size for 20 valves, increase in the size
and quantity of bolts, and for additional shipping. Additional costs calculated
on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,732.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item No. 5 - DELETE CATCH BASIN AND DRAINAGE WORK AT MAINTENANCE BUILDING
Plans call for the construction of a new catch basin and for the improvement of
site drainage in an area east of the maintenance building in the vicinity of the
surge tower. This change order item provides for the deletion of these
improvements because of plans to renovate the entire maintenance building area
under a future contract. The Contractor provided a fair and reasonable credit for
the deleted work on a direct cost basis.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: (S 7,193.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5
�.,./ P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
Item No. 6 - CHANGE ROUTING - HIGH STRENGTH SLUDGE PIPING SYSTEM
Plans for the high strength sludge piping system indicated that the four system
discharge locations were in the pump rooms for Digesters "C", "D", "F", and "G".
At a point in time prior to the start of work on the P2-37 contract, the Districts
selected the location of the four discharge connections and installed valved
fittings in the walls of Digesters "C", "D", "F" and "G". The four locations
prepared by the Districts, on the exterior portion of the digester walls, were not
addressed in the high strength sludge system piping plans. This change order item
provides for the change of the sludge system pipe routing and for the connection
of same to the fittings installed by the Districts. Additional costs calculated
on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 16,399.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item No. 7 - EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION - ROUTING CHANGE - HIGH STRENGTH SLUDGE
PIPING
This change order item provides for the exploratory excavation of the underground
high strength sludge piping system described in Item 6 above. The underground
route selected by the Districts for the change in the high strength sludge piping
installation was located to the west of Digester "C", "D", "F" and "G". Staff
was not certain of the quantity and location of existing utilities and process
piping along the selected route and determined that it would be cost effective to
excavate the entire trench line for possible conflicts. Only minor conflicts
existed but were eliminated in the design of the modified piping sytem. Costs for
this added pipe work were calculated on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 69544.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 33,600.00
TOTAL TIMES EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days
"L-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(j ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
GRANT NO. N/A
C. 0. NO. Two
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF DIGESTER MILESTONE TIME
Original Activity Start Date November 2, 1988
Original Activity Duration Time 300 Calendar Days
Original Activity Completion Date August 28, 1988
Adjustment Milestone Time This Change Order 0 Calendar Days
Total Adjustment Milestone Time 6 Calendar Days
Revised Activity Duration 306 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Date September 3, 1989
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date November 2, 1988
Original Contract Time 425 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date December 31, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time No Change
Revised Final Completion Due Date No Change
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
"L-4" AGENDA ITEM #90) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-4"
i
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5
�.. P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE June
JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB N . P2-37 Contract Price $ 5 395 000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ —
This Change (Add) (8edust) $" 33:600.00
Amended Contract Price $ 5, 5� 69� 1.UU
Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
REC01 NDED BY:
-
ZonS ruction Manager Uate
ZIEBARTH AND ALPER
ACCEPTED BY: APPRO D Y:
2/etooaY:
i
on ac or Date Actor or of Engineering ate
"L-5" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-5"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
108"ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962-2411
May 24, 1989
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 4 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell
Consulting Engineer in Connection with Central Power Generation
Systems, Job No. J-19
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following
fee for Addendum No. 4 with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for
design of a steam turbine system to utilize excess heat to produce power,
on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultants and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $68,962.00, as.
follows:
Engineering Services, (hourly rates
Including labor plus overhead
at 175%), not to exceed $ 58,602
subconsultants, not to exceed 2,700
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 1,400
Fixed Profit 6,270
Total Addendum No. 4, not to exceed $ 68,972
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee
as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not
result in excessive profits for the consultant.
Is/Don E. Smith /s/Rona rey
Ronald B
Don mith oeety Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes 1 '
Director of Engineering �..✓
Selection Committee
"M" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "M"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-51
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT WITH
BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS RE
�►� DESIGN OF JOB NO. J-19
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN
AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR
PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF CENTRAL POWER GENERATION
SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-19, PROVIDING FOR DESIGN OF
STEAM TURBINE SYSTEM TO BE INCORPORATED INTO
SAID PROJECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with
Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for preliminary design of Central Power
Generation Systems, Job No. J-19; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for additional services
necessary relative to application and processing of a Permit to Construct from
the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) ; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for additional services
required for background NOx and health risk assessment modeling information
required by SCAQMD; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to said agreement provided for phased final design
of said project; Phase I work to commence immediately for electrical system
configuration studies, digester gas system modifications and ongoing South Coast
Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) permitting interface, and Phase II work
for final design, construction and training services to commence upon receipt of
a permit to construct from SCAQMD; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with
Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers to provide for design of a steam turbine
system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of engine heat to
`..d produce additional electricity; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on May 10,
"N-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1"
1989, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said
additional services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection
of professional engineering and architectural services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 4 dated June 14, 1989, to that certain
Professional Services Agreement dated July 9, 1986, by and between County
Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, for
preliminary design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing
for design of a steam turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take
advantage of engine heat to produce additional electricity, is hereby approved
and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount
not to exceed $68,972.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized
compensation from $3,592,838.00 to an amount not to exceed $3,661,810.00:
Professional Services, at hourly
rates for labor plus overhead
at 175%, not to exceed $58,602.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 2,700.00
Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 1,400.00
Fixed Profit 6,270.00
TOTAL Addendum No. 4, not to exceed $68,972.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 4 in form approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
"N-2" AGENDA ITEM N9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-52
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
�.►� AGREEMENT WITH JONES 8 STOKES AS IATES, IN .
FOR PREPARATION OF AN EIR FOR THE WASTEWATER
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE
COLLECT ON, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
MASTER PLAN PROGRAMMATIC EIR
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH JONES 8 STOKES ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PREPARATION
OF AN EIR FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL
FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE COLLECTION, TREATMENT
AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN PROGRAMMATIC
EIR, PROVIDING FOR A REALLOCATION OF THE COSTS AMONG
CATEGORIES WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT
k t * * * * k * * * * k k k * * k
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional
Services Agreement with Jones 8 Stokes Associates, Inc. for preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report for the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Element of
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Programmatic EIR;
and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said Agreement with Jones 8 Stokes Associates,
Inc. provided for deletion of the marine subconsultant services of Kinnetics
Laboratories, Inc. and substitute Jones 8 Stokes' personnel for said work; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with
Jones 8 Stokes Associates to provide for a reallocation of the costs among the
categories within said agreement with no change in the maximum authorized
compensation.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated June 14, 1989, to that certain
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-11,
Professional Services Agreement dated March 9, 1988, by and between County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and
Jones 8 Stokes Associates, Inc., for preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report for the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities element of the
Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Programmatic
Environmental Impact Report, providing for a reallocation of the costs among
the categories within said agreement, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That said reallocation of costs shall not change the maximum
authorized compensation of $213,126.00; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
"0-2" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-59-2
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR CONTRACT N -11-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR NORTH BRANCH OF THE ROLLING HILLS DRIVE RELIEF
SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-11-3
WHEREAS, Sam W. Peterson & Associates, Inc. . District's engineers, have
completed preparation of the plans and specifications for North Branch of the
Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-3.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 2of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the project for construction of the North Branch of the
Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-3, is hereby
approved. Said project was included in the Final Focused Environmental Impact
Report on Amendment No. 1 to the Consolidated Master Plan of Treatment
Facilities for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 relative to District No. 2
Euclid/Newhope-Placentia Drainage Area approved by the Board of Directors an
June 10, 1987. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on June 11,
1987, in accordance with the District's Guidelines Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Sam W. Peterson & Associates,
Inc. , District's engineers, for construction of North Branch of the Rolling
Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-3, are hereby approved and
adopted; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
"P-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICT 2 11P-1"
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of 1
the State of California; and, �•r�
Section 4. . That the General Nanager be authorized to establish the date
and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section S. That the Secretary and the District's Director of Engineering
or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of
Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June, 14, 1989.
"P-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICT 2 "P-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: Mladen Buntich Construction Company DATE une 14, 1989
JOB: MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE (VAULT) REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS
LOCATION5, CONTRACT NO. 3-28R-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Aedust:) $ 72,500.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 BONUS MANHOLES
Section 50-8 of the contract specifications provides for a $500.00 per day bonus
for certain manholes completed before the specified time of completion. This
change order item provides compensation for early completion of two "bonus
manholes" which have been completed since Change Order No. 4, executed on
April 12, 1989 for bonus on three manholes.
Manhole No. Specified Time Actual Time Bonus Time Bonus Due
59 40 Days 11 Days 29 Days $ 14,500.00
63 40 Days 12 Days 28 Days $ 14000.0.00
'500
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 28,500.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 ADD MANHOLE REHABILITATION AT VALLEY VIEW STREET AND LA CANADA AVENUE
The Contractor was directed to furnish all labor, materials and equipment for
reconstruction of manhole at the intersection of Valley View Street and La Canada
Avenue in Buena Park. Also included are bypass facilities, traffic control and
safety requirements. It was determined in the best interests of the District to
include this work now versus doing the work in a few months under a new contract.
The City of Buena Park will be repairing Valley View Street before our new
contract can be awarded. If we waited to reconstruct this manhole we would be
excavating in the newly paved street. This item was negotiated for a fixed cost
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 44,000.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 20 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 72,500.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 20 Calendar Da s
"!d-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) - DISTRICT 3 �0-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92798
CHANGE ORDER �'••'
C.O. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: Mladen Buntich Construction Company DATE June 14, 989
JOB: MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE (VAULT) REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS
LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO.
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and any
previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 20 days
extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that
no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as previously granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date July 9, 1987
Original Contract Time 750 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date - July 27, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 20 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 38 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 788 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date September 3, 1989
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 4 317 000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ ,3 4
This Change (Add) (Dedwet:) $ 56OT�—
Amended Contract Price $ 4,537,135.94
Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECO NDED BY:
Topttruction manager Date
MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
ACCEPTED BY.
BY: APPR EC Bq4UZI,
(,
on tractor
a e � ector o •ngtneertng ate
"(a-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) - DISTRICT 3 "0-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: Christeve Corporation DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Pedwet) $ 163,677.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 UNDISCLOSED SERVICE CONNECTION
The Contractor encountered an undisclosed 6-inch VCP sewer service connection at
Station No. 27+50 while potholing for other utilities. The Contractor was
directed to repair the sewer connection. This item was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,707.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 UNDISCLOSED NATURAL GAS LINE
The Contractor encountered a 2-inch plastic natural gas line within the area of
the trench excavation at Station No. 30+07. The gas line was shown outside of the
excavation area on the drawings and marked on the pavement by the utility company
as outside of the excavation. The Contractor was directed to move the plastic gas
line out of the way during excavation and placement of the sewer pipe and then
move it back. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant
to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,567.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 3 ADD THREE ACCESS TEES AND MANHOLES
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install three accesses to the force
main at Station Nos. 5+00, 25+30 and 39+20. Each access consists of a 36x20 MJ
tee and flange, two flex couplings, stainless steel nuts and bolts, polyurethane
coating, a 72-inch manhole and all appurtenances, plus labor and equipment to
construct same in the amount of $22,531.00 The accesses are needed for
maintenance purposes and dewatering adjacent gravity sewer lines when required for
maintenance and construction. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 67,593.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"R-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) (1) - DISTS. 5 & 6 "R-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: Christeve Corporation DATE June
JOB: Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31
Item 4 REMOVAL OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
Reference is made to the Detailed Specifications, Section 52-16. The referenced
specifications indicated that contaminated soil may or may not be present and
therefore no provisions for payment for the removal of contaminated soil were
included in the contract. The Contractor did, in fact, encounter contaminated
soil and was directed to take special precautions and transport the material to a
designated disposal site. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: E 8,900.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 INSTALL NEW 36-INCH LINE AT LOWER GRADE
The Contractor encountered several existing utilities between Station Nos. 21+25
and 45+20 which were lower in elevation than shown on the drawings. The
Contractor was directed to lower the grade of the new 36-inch ductile iron pipe in
order to accommodate the utility lines. The cost of this item includes additional
excavation and Class II aggregate base backfill as specified in Section 52-16 of
the contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: E 29,327.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 6 ADDITIONAL ASPHALT PAVING AND BACKFILL
The Contractor was directed to widen the. excavation between Station Nos. 21+00 and
27+65, and between Station Nos. 36+50 and 45+20'to remove the old existing 27-inch
steel force main. The old line varied from the location shown on the drawings and
from the location of the new 36-inch line being installed at the above-noted
stations. In order to keep the new 36-inch line on the correct alignment, the
excavation was widened which resulted in additional Class II aggregate base
backfill and asphalt paving. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)8 of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 32,583.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days �...�
"R-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) (1) - DISTS, 5 & 6 "R-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: Christeve Corporation DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31
Item 7 BONUS PAYMENT
The contract specified 180 days for contract completion with provisions including
liquidated damages of $500.00 per day for each day of delay past the 180 days and
bonus payments of $500.00 per day for each day of completion prior to
June 16, 1989. (Reference: Detailed Specifications, Section 50-8)
Actual
Original Completion Days
Completion Date Bonus Date Date Bonus Bonus/Day Bonus
July 9, 1989 June 16, 1989 May 5, 1989 42 $500.00 $ 21,000.00
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 21,000.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 163,677.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract Time made by any previously issued Change Orders. It
is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order and no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages
have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date January 11,1989
Original Contract Time 180 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date July 9, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 180 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date July 9, 1989
Actual Final Completion Date May 5, 1989
�i Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
"R-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) (1) - DISTS. 5 & 6 "R-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: Christeve Corporation DATE June 14, 1989
JOB: Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31
Original Contract Price $ 1,491 434.01
Prev. Auth. Changes $—
This Change (Add) (Dedus%) $
Amended Contract Price $�5,1T1 DO
Board Authorization Date: June 14, 1989
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
REC NMENDED BY:
car
nstruc tion manager ate
CHRISTEVE CORPORATION
' EP APP 0 BY:
F�4
o ractor Date rector o Engineering—L e
"R-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) (1) - DISTS. 5 & 6 "R-4"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-60
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-31 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 5 AND 6 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING REPLACEMENT
OF PORTIONS OF COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN,
CONTRACT NO. 5-31, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING
FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of
Orange County, California,
00 HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Christeve Corporation, has completed the
construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Replacement of
Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, on May 5, 1989; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract, which said recomnendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Farce Main,
Contract No. 5-31, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms
of the contract therefor, dated January 11, 1989; and,
Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Christeve Corporation
setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Replacement of Portions
of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, is hereby approved and accepted
in form approved by the General Counsel ; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 5, acting for
itself and on behalf of District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to
�...� execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
S"' AGENDA ITEM #9(t ) (2) - DISTS. 5 & 6 "S"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-62
ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM RANCHO TOMAS,
IN LI FORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY APOLL
D V L PMENT CORP RATION RE C NTRA T NO. 14-1-1A
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 6, 7 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM RANCHO TOMAS,
INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FORMERLY APOLLO
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,
IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE BAKER-
GISLER INTERCEPTOR, FROM FAIRVIEW ROAD TO PLANT
NO. 1, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1A
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of
Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated May 23, 1989, wherein
a permanent ingress and egress easement, in the vicinity of the Santa Ana River
Channel to the Greenvilee-Banning Channel northerly of Gisler Avenue, for right
of way required in connection with construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor,
from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, is granted to County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14, is hereby accepted from Rancho Tomas
Inc., a California Corporation, formerly Apollo Development Corporation, a
California Corporation; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is
more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That payment in the amount of $37,700.00 plus costs for said
right-of-way is hereby authorized; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards of Directors is hereby
authorized and directed to record said permanent Grant of Easement in the
Official Records of Orange County, California. l
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989. v
"T" AGENDA ITEM #9(u) - DISTS. G, 7 & 14 "T"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-64
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF COSTA
MESA-FOR A COOPERATIVE PROJECT TO INCLUDE
CITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO BAKER STREET IN
DISTRICT'S CONTRACT N . 14-1-1B
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 7 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF COSTA MESA FOR A
COOPERATIVE PROJECT TO INCLUDE CITY STREET
IMPROVEMENTS TO BAKER STREET IN THE DISTRICT'S
CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE BAKER-GISLER
INTERCEPTOR, FROM BRISTOL STREET TO FAIRVIEW
ROAD, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1B
WHEREAS, the Districts have identified the need for an interceptor line in
Baker Street, designated as the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to
Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa has identified the need for street
Improvements and maintenance of Baker Street between Bristol Street and Fairview
Road; and,
WHEREAS, public inconvenience can be minimized and a cost savings can be
realized by the joint construction of the Districts' sewer line project and the
City's street improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 7 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated June 14, 1989, by and between
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 7 and 14 and the City of Costa Mesa, relative
to a cooperative project to include City street improvements to Baker Street in
the Districts' contract for construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor,
from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B, is hereby approved
and accepted; and,
"U-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "U-1"
Section 2. That said cooperative project shall be administered by the
� Ir
Sanitation Districts, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the `�►'
agreement. The City of Costa Mesa shall pay all costs associated with street
Improvements to Baker Street between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, including
engineering, design, excavation, surveying and inspection, estimated to be
$1,600,000.00; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to
execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts in form approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
"U-2" AGENDA ITEM #S(v) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "U-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-53
AWARDING JOB NO. P1-34-2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2
* * k k * k k k * * * * k k k
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which
Is a portion of the previously-approved Master Plan Report for the Joint
Treatment Works. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan
approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Joint Treatment
Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report covering this project
was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 10, 1985; and,
Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of
contract be made to Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc.
for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, and
bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That the contract for Sludge Handling Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, be awarded to Advanco Constructors,
Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. in the total amount of $19,085,600.00 in
accordance with the terns of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
`..,.� Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
"V-1" AGENDA ITEM k12(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "�-1 "
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor j
for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, `•••'
In form approved by the General Counsel ; and,
Section S. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
"V-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
/ May 23, 1989
11:00 a.m. IW40 EW5 AVENUE
60.8127
ONE ADDENDUM Aa. AUNDAN
wUNieix VeIU0 UALIw RNie 921289121
0IA19W.9a11
BID TABULATION
SHEET
JOB NO. P1-34-2
PROJECT TITLE Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION New Truck Loading Facility, Sludge Transfer System,
Plant Water Pump Station, and 12 KV Service Center
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 22.4 Million BUDGET AMOUNT $ 24.0 Million
====x=======CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID=====__
1. Advanco Constructors, Div. of $19,085,600.00
Zurn Constructors, Inc., Upland, CA
2. Brinderson Corporation, Irvine, CA $19,730,000.00
3. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. $19,800,000.00
Camarillo, CA
4. Steve P. Rados, Inc., Santa Ana, CA $20,686,289.00
S. Kiewit Pacific Co., Santa Fe Springs, CA $20,882,000.00
6. S. A. Healy Co. , Azusa, CA $23,691,524.00
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the
low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Advanco
Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. in the bid amount of
$19,085,600.00 as the lowest and best bid.
`..d "ff&ei M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
"V-3" AGENDA ITEM #12(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-56 r
AMENDING RULES OF PROCEDURE RESOLUTION NO. 87-51
RE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-51 ESTABLISHING RULES
OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF THE
DISTRICTS RE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 87-51 established rules of procedure to facilitate
the orderly handling of business to come before the Joint Administrative
Organization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
of Orange County, California; and,
WHEREAS, these Boards deem it desirable and appropriate to amend said rules
of procedure relative to membership of the Executive Committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
Section 1. That Section 13.(a) of Resolution No. 87-51, establishing rules
of procedure for the conduct of business of the Districts, be amended to read as
follows:
13. STANDING COMMITTEES:
(a) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - There shall be a permanent Committee
designated as the Executive Committee which shall consist of the
Chairman of the Board of Directors Of each District, or other
District Director as designated by the Chairman, the Directors who
represent the Orange County Board of Supervisors, and the Chairman
and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization.
Each past Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall
also serve as a member of the Executive Committee, provided that
said person serves as an active Director of a District Board. Any
"W-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (6) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-1"
person designated as an alternate member of the Executive
..
Committee must be an elected official of the same District as the
regular Executive Committee member.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall
be the Chairman of the Executive Committee. The Committee may fix
a regular meeting time and place or may meet at the call of the
Chairman.
The Committee may consider any matters related to the ,joint
ownership, operation and construction of all the Districts and
make recommendations thereon to the Joint Boards of Directors of
the Districts."
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
"W-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (6) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-57
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO AGREEMENT FOR
EMPLOYMENT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO AGREEMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT
OF GENERAL COUNSEL
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Amendment No. 10 to that certain Agreement for Employment
of General Counsel dated May 1, 1975, by and between County Sanitation District
No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California, and Thomas L. Woodruff, Attorney at Law,
providing for an adjustment of the fee schedule for legal services performed as
General Counsel for said Districts, as indicated on Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and by reference made a part of this resolution, effective July 1, 1989, is
hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said amendment on behalf of itself and
Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
"X-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (7) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-1"
FEE SCHEDULE FOR LEGAL SERVICES PERFORMED BY THOMAS L. WOODRUFF AS GENERAL COUNSEL
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1989
Thomas L. Woodruff - $140.00/hour
Other Partners of Firm - 140.00/hour
Associate Attorneys - 115.00/hour
Paralegals - 60.00/hour
Appearance by Counsel at
conferences or meetings - 400.00/day (or $140.00/hour whichever is less)
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 89-57
"X-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(5)(7) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
June 1, 1989 EI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
,BBAA Ews AVENUE
Pa BOX Biel /
County Sanitation District No. 1 EWNTUN V4 Y,CAU, .We
Supplemental Sewer Service User Fee Report
Fiscal 1989-90
District No. 1 modified its long-range financial plan in 1984 to include a supplemental
user fee for single family residences, multi-family residences and non-residential
properties. The fee was and continues to be necessary to make up a shortfall in ad valorem
tax revenues and to provide increased funding necessary for operations and maintenance as
well as necessary modification and replacement of capital facilities.
The proposed sewer use fee amounts are based upon financial studies and analysis by
District staff as reflected in the 1989-90 budget recommendations by the Fiscal Policy
Committee and the Executive Committee for Joint Works Operating and Working Capital Funds
which include increases in anticipated expenses to maintain and operate the joint
treatment plants. Personnel related expenses are expected to increase as a result of
newly authorized positions, filling currently authorized but unfilled positions and salary
and wage adjustments provided in existing MOU's with employee groups. Chemical expenses
are expected to increase as new odor control facilities requiring chemical additions are
placed into service and as more flow receives advanced primary or physical/chemical
treatment. Increased solids handling and disposal costs are budgeted as landfill disposal
costs are increased and as sludge reuse/disposal options become more costly because of
regulatory requirements and increased production of sludge. New odor control facilities
will also require additional use of utilities and those expenses are budgeted to increase.
Other general repair, maintenance and operating expenses are also budgeted to increase as
a result of inflation, additional flow, regulatory requirements and increased complexity
and age of the facilities.
District No. 1 shares in these joint works operations and maintenance expenses on the basis
of flaw. Engineering estimates for 1989-90 indicate that the District's share of joint
works operations and maintenance expenses will be $4,092,000. When the individual
District operations and maintenance expenses and dry period funding requirements are added
and the other projected revenue sources are deducted, the aggregate amount of supplemental
user fees required is calculated to be $3,202,000.
Using the Orange County Assessor's Office report of residential units and non-residential
building square feet, the Finance Department has calculated the following supplemental
user fee data:
Class Number Rate Amount Raised
Single Family Residence 28,068 $45/unit $1,263,000
Multi-Family Residence 17,100 $27/unit 462,000
Non Residential 46,166,558 sq. ft. $32/1000 sq. ft. 1.477,000
Total $3,202,000
This report is based upon data received from all Departments of the County Sanitation
Districts, the Orange County Assessor's Office and various regulatory agencies. The calcu-
lations are based on metered and historical data and estimates and were performed by staff.
The fees are reasonable, directly related to costs and based upon average sewer use by `,�/
property type. Users placing a heavy demand on the sewerage system, either by quantity or
nature of discharge, are assessed a separate additional fee.
"Y" AGENDA ITEM #26(a) - DISTRICT 1 "Y"
ORDINANCE NO. 112
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 109 ESTABLISHING SANITARY
SEWER SERVICE CHARGES, AND REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO. 111
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, does hereby FIND:
A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth
the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the
District; and,
B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to
the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992;
and,
C. That the new sewer use fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed
the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is
levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Table A, as adopted by Section 2 of Ordinance No. 109, is hereby
amended to read as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance.
Section 2: This Ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1989.
Section 3: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to .the adoption of
this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of
general circulation in the District as required by law.
"Z-1" AGENDA ITEM #26(b) - DISTRICT 1 "Z-1"
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 1 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
Chairman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of erectors
County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California
_2- �..�
"Z-2" AGENDA ITEM #26(b) - DISTRICT 1 "Z-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-58-1
DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO
COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 1989-90
PROPERTY TAX BILLS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE
CHARGES ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 has
heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
-County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111; and,
WHEREAS, California Health 8 Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such
charges, as adopted by District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax
roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together
with and not separate from, its general taxes.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 1 of Orange County, California.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to California Health 8 Safety Code Section 5473,
the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer
service charges, as established by Ordinance No. 112, on the 1989-90 property
tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as,
together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer
service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year
thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this resolution remains
in effect; and,
`..� Section 2. That pursuant to California Health 8 Safety Code Section 5473,
this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed
"AA-1" AGENDA ITEM #26(d) - DISTRICT 1 "AA-1"
or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by I
Ordinance No. 112, is changed; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and
directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order
set forth in Section 1 herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
"AA-2" AGENDA ITEM #26(d) - DISTRICT 1 "AA-2"
COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICTS
May 31, 1989 of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
11 ELLISAVENUE
10A
Count "Sanitation District No. 5 AG.a011 aouxruN VALLEr.nUEoaNA 92lae•e+21
Supplemental Sewer Service User Fee Report nt.i asa.a.,t
Fiscal 1989-90
District No. 5 modified its long-range financial plan in 1981 to include a supplemental
user fee for single family residences, multi-family residences and non-residential
properties. The fee was and continues to be necessary to make up a shortfall in ad valorem
tax revenues and to provide increased funding necessary for operations and maintenance as
well as necessary modification and replacement of capital facilities.
The proposed sewer use fee amounts are based upon financial studies and analysis by
District staff as reflected in the 1989-90 budget recommendations by the Fiscal Policy
Committee and the Executive Committee for Joint Works Operating and Working Capital Funds
which include increases in anticipated expenses to maintain and operate the joint
treatment plants. Personnel related expenses are expected to increase as a result of
newly authorized positions, filling currently authorized but unfilled positions and salary
and wage adjustments provided in existing MOD's with employee groups. Chemical expenses
are expected to increase as new odor control facilities requiring chemical additions are
placed into service and as more flaw receives advanced primary or physical/chemical
treatment. Increased solids handling and disposal costs are budgeted as landfill disposal
costs are increased and as sludge reuse/disposal options become more costly because of
regulatory requirements and increased production of sludge. New odor control facilities
will also require additional use of utilities and those expenses are budgeted to increase.
Other general repair, maintenance and operating expenses are also budgeted to Increase as
a result of inflation, additional flow, regulatory requirements and increased complexity
and age of the facilities.
District No. 5 shares in these joint works operations and maintenance expenses on the basis
of flow. Engineering estimates for 1989-90 indicate that the District's share of joint
works operations and maintenance expenses will be $2,026,000. When the individual
District operations and maintenance expenses and dry period funding requirements are added
and the other projected revenue sources are deducted, the aggregate amount of supplemental
user fees required is calculated to be $1,149,000.
Using the Orange County Assessor's Office report of residential units and non-residential
building square feet, the Finance Department has calculated the following supplemental
user fee data:
Class Number Rate Amount Raised
Single Family Residence 14,064 $45/unit S 633,000
Multi-Family Residence 10,670 $27/unit 288,000
Non Residential 7,132,191 sq. ft. $32/1000 sq. ft. 228,000
Total $1,149,000
This report is based upon data received from all Departments of the County Sanitation
Districts, the Orange County Assessor's Office and various regulatory agencies. The calcu-
lations are based on metered and historical data and estimates and were performed by staff.
�''The fees are reasonable, directly related to costs and based upon average sewer use by
property type. Users placing a heavy demand on the sewerage system, either by quantity or
nature of discharge, are assessed a separate additional fee.
"BB" AGENDA ITEM #29(a) - DISTRICT 5 "BB"
ORDINANCE NO. 519
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 516 ESTABLISHING SANITARY
SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, does hereby FIND: . . ..
A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth
the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the
District; and,
B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to
the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992;
and,
C. That the new sewer use fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed
the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is
levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Table A, as adopted by Section 2 of Ordinance No. 516, is hereby
amended to read as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance.
Section 2: This Ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1989.
Section 3: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of
general circulation in the District as required by law.
•CC-1" AGENDA ITEM #29(b) - DISTRICT 5 "CC-1"
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 5 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
Chairman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
-2
"CC-2" AGENDA ITEM #29(b) - DISTRICT 5 "CC-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-61-5
DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO
COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 198 70
PRFERTY TAX BILLS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE
CHARGES ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 has
heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; and,
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such
charges, as adopted by District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax
roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together
with and not separate from, its general taxes.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 5 of Orange County, California.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473,
the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer
service charges, as established by Ordinance No. 519, on the 1969-90 property
tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as,
together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer
service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year
thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this resolution remains
in effect; and,
Section 2. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473,
this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed
"DD-l " AGENDA ITEM #29(d) - DISTRICT 5 "DD-1"
or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by
Ordinance No. 519, is changed; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and
directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order
set forth in Section I herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
"DD-2" AGENDA ITEM #29(d) - DISTRICT 5 "DD-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DisTPoCTS
May 31, 1989 N ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
10W EW9 AVENNE
0 WX O1]7
County Sanitation District No. 6 FOUNTAIN VALY.M110A IA 227E .
Supplemental Sewer Service User Fee Report 71..96E-aa11
Fiscal 1989-90
District No. 6 modified its long-range financial plan in 1983 to include a supplemental
user fee for single family residences, multi-family residences and non-residential
properties. The fee was and continues to be necessary to make up a shortfall in ad valorem
tax revenues and to provide increased funding necessary for operations and maintenance as
well as necessary modification and replacement of capital facilities.
The proposed sewer use fee amounts are based upon financial studies and analysis by
District staff as reflected in the 1989-90 budget recommendations by the Fiscal Policy
Committee and the Executive Committee for Joint Works Operating and Working Capital Funds
which include increases in anticipated expenses to maintain and operate the joint
treatment plants. Personnel related expenses are expected to increase as a result of
newly authorized positions, filling currently authorized but unfilled positions and salary
and wage adjustments provided in existing MOD's with employee groups. Chemical expenses
are expected to increase as new odor control facilities requiring chemical additions are
placed into service and as more flow receives advanced primary or physical/chemical
treatment. Increased solids handling and disposal costs are budgeted as landfill disposal
costs are Increased and as sludge reuse/disposal options become more costly because of
regulatory requirements and increased production of sludge. New odor control facilities
will also require additional use of utilities and those expenses are budgeted to increase.
Other general repair, maintenance and operating expenses are also budgeted to increase as
a result of inflation, additional flow, regulatory requirements and increased complexity
and age of the facilities.
District No. 6 shares in these joint works operations and maintenance expenses on the basis
of flow. Engineering estimates for 1989-90 indicate that the District's share of joint
works operations and maintenance expenses will be $2,587,000. When the individual
District operations and maintenance expenses and dry period funding requirements are added
and the other projected revenue sources are deducted, the aggregate amount of supplemental
user fees required is calculated to be $2,077,000.
Using the Orange County Assessor's Office report of residential units and non-residential
building square feet, the Finance Department has calculated the following supplemental
user fee data:
Class Number Rate Amount Raised
Single Family Residence 19,154 $49/unit $ 939,000
Multi-Family Residence 17,664 $29/unit 512,000
Non Residential 17,874,795 sq. ft. $35/1000 sq. ft. 626,000
Total JL2L7 000
This report is based upon data received from all Departments of the County Sanitation
Districts, the Orange County Assessor's Office and various regulatory agencies. The calcu-
lations are based on metered and historical data and estimates and were performed by staf'
The fees are reasonable, directly related to costs and based upon average sewer use by
property type. Users placing a heavy demand on the sewerage system, either by quantity or
nature of discharge, are assessed a separate additional fee.
"EE" AGENDA ITEM #32(a) - DISTRICT 6 "EE"
ORDINANCE NO. 613
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 609 ESTABLISHING SANITARY
SEWER SERVICE CHARGES, AND REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO. 612
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, does hereby FIND:
A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth
the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the
District; and,
B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to
the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992;
and,
C. That the new sewer use fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed
the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is
levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Table A, as adopted by Section 2 of Ordinance No. 609, is hereby
amended to read as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance.
Section 2: This Ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1989.
Section 3: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of
general circulation in the District as required by law.
"FF-1" AGENDA ITEM #32(b) - DISTRICT 6 "FF-1"
+ � s
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 6 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
Chairman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 6
of Orange County, California
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 6
of Orange County, California
-2_ �.✓
"FF-2" AGENDA ITEM #32(b) - DISTRICT 6 "FF-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 89-63-6
...i
DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO
COLLECT SEWER SERVICEON 1989-gO
PR PERTY TAX BILLS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE
CHARGES ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 has
heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 613, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 612; and,
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such
charges, as adopted by District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax
roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together
with and not separate from, its general taxes.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 6 of Orange County, California.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473,
the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer
service charges, as established by Ordinance No. 613, on the 1989-90 property
tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as,
together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer
service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year
thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this resolution remains
`...� in effect; and,
Section 2. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473,
"GG-1" AGENDA ITEM #32(d) - DISTRICT 6 "GG-l "
this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed
or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by
Ordinance No. 613, is changed; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and
directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order
set forth in Section 1 herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
"GG-2" AGENDA ITEM #32(d) - DISTRICT o GG-2"
` • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
June 7, 1989 el ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
,OaM ELUE AVENUE
County Sanitation District No. 11 ac.eo.e+ao
fflUNraiN vaLLEr.CALIFORNIA 92)28.6+2)
Supplemental sewer Service User Fee Report 111.1 acaaa+,
Fiscal 1989-90
District No. 11 modified its long-range financial plan in 1987 to include a supplemental
user fee for single family residences, multi-family residences and non-residential
properties. The fee was and continues to be necessary to make up a shortfall in ad valorem
tax revenues and to provide increased funding necessary for operations and maintenance as
well as necessary modification and replacement of capital facilities.
The proposed sewer use fee amounts are based upon financial studies and analysis by
District staff as reflected in the 1989-90- budget recommendations by the Fiscal Policy
Committee and the Executive Committee for Joint Works Operating and Working Capital Funds
which include increases in anticipated expenses to maintain and operate the joint
treatment plants. Personnel related expenses are expected to increase as a result of
newly authorized positions, filling currently authorized but unfilled positions and salary
and wage adjustments provided in existing MOU' s with employee groups. Chemical expenses
are expected to increase as new odor control facilities requiring chemical additions are
placed into service and as more flow receives advanced primary or physical/chemical
treatment. Increased solids handling and disposal costs are budgeted as landfill disposal
costs are increased and as sludge reuse/disposal options become more costly because of
regulatory requirements and increased production of sludge. New odor control facilities
will also require additional use of utilities and those. expenses are budgeted to increase.
Other general repair, maintenance and operating expenses are also budgeted to increase as
a result of inflation, additional flow, regulatory requirements and increased complexity
and age of the facilities.
District No. 11 shares in these joint works operations and maintenance expenses on the basis
of flow. Engineering estimates for 1989-90 indicate that the District's share of joint
works operations and maintenance expenses will be $3,175,000. When the Individual
District operations and maintenance expenses and dry period funding requirements are added
and the other projected revenue sources are deducted, the aggregate amount of supplemental
user fees required is calculated to be $1,851,000.
Using the Orange County Assessor's Office report of residential units and non-residential
building square feet, the Finance Department has calculated the following supplemental
user fee data:
Class Number Rate Amount Raised
Single Family Residence 29,036 $40/unit $1,161,000
Multi-Family Residence 12,898 $24/unit 309,000
Non Residential 13,162,482 sq. ft. $29/1000 sq. ft. 381,000
Total 1 851,000
This report is based upon data received from all Departments of the County Sanitation
Districts, the Orange County Assessor's Office and various regulatory agencies. The calcu-
lations are based on metered and historical data and estimates and were performed by staff.
The fees are reasonable, directly related to costs and based upon average sewer use by
property type. Users placing a heavy demand on the sewerage system, either by quantity or
nature of discharge, are assessed a separate additional fee.
"HH" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 11 "HH"
ORDINANCE NO. 1109
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 1108 ESTABLISHING SANITARY
SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California, does hereby FIND:
A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth
the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the
District; and,
B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to
the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992;
and,
C. That the new sewer use fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed
the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is
levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Table A, as adopted by Section 2 of Ordinance No. 1108, is hereby
amended to read as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance.
Section 2: This Ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1989.
Section 3: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of
general circulation in the District as required by law.
"II-1" AGENDA ITEM #35(b) - DISTRICT 11
`...� PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 11 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
a rman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 11
of Orange County, California
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 11
of Orange County, California
-2-
"II-2" AGENDA ITEM #35(b) - DISTRICT 11 "II-2"
o
RESOLUTION NO. 89-65-11 l ��
DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO
COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 1989-95
ERTY TAX BILL
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE
CHARGES ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILLS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 has
heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; and,
WHEREAS, California Health 8 Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such
charges, as adopted by District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax
roll to the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together
with and not separate from, its general taxes.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 11 of Orange County, California.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to California Health 6 Safety Code Section 5473,
the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer
service charges, as established by Ordinance No. 1109, on the 1989-90 property
tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as,
together with and not separate from, the general taxes; and that such sewer
service charges be included in the annual property tax bills for each year
thereafter, for so long as the rates do not change and this resolution remains
in effect; and,
Section 2. That pursuant to California Health 6 Safety Code Section 5473,
this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed
""JJ-1" AGENDA ITEM #35(d) - DISTRICT 11 "JJ-1"
.r'
or until such time as the rate of sewer service charges, as established by
�,..� Ordinance No. 1109, is changed; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and
directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order
set forth in Section 1 herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 14, 1989.
"JJ-2" AGENDA ITEM #35(d) - DISTRICT 11 "JJ-2"
i
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 11 2, 3, 59 61 71 112 13 AND 14
OF
w
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
MAY 10, 1989
P�ITAT1GN
o C C
J o
N
Slee. 19g
0
GE co
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 El T. AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
i
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on May 10, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., in
the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the
roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chai man Orma Crank
x Dan Griset, Chai man pro tem —Dan Young
z Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula Kennedy
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: x A.B. -Buck" Catlin, Chairnan _Chris Norby
x W1111am D. Mahoney, Chairman pro tem —HenryBeth Graham
x Roland E. Bigonger _ W. Wades
x Dan Griset _Dan Young
x Ron Isles _Garrey Nelson
z James Neal _George Scott
a= Arthur G. Newton _Carol Downey
z Bob Perry _Norman Culver
x Iry Pickler _Fred Hunter
x Wayne Silzel _James T. Fasbender
x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
z Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Palls, Chairman Orbrey Duke
z Garrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
x Edward L. Allen _Paul Verellen
a Wes Bannister _John Erskine
z A.B. -Buck- Catlin —BobChris Norby
x Norman Culver _ Perry
a Don R. Griffin Donna L. Chessen
7—Dan Griset _Dan Young
x John Kanel x _
William D. Mahoney Beth Graham
i 7—James Neal _George Scott
x Iry Pickler _Fred Hunter
x J.R. -Bob- Stefen _Dewey Wiles
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
x Charles Sylvia _Robert Wahistrom
x Edna Wilson _Joe Hunt
DISTRICT NO. 5: John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman x Evelyn Hart
a Donald A. Strauss, Chai man pro tem Evelyn Hart
x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wanner, Chairman _Harry Green
x Ruthelyn Plummer. Chat moan pro teen Evelyn Hart
x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman Fred Barrera
x Rlcharo Edgar, Chairman pro tem —_Ursula Kennedy
z Dan Griset —RogerDan Young
x Don R. Roth _ Stanton
x Sally Anne Sheridan _Larry Agran
r° a Donald A. Strauss _John C. Cox, Jr.
x James Wahner _Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tom Mays, Chairman _Jim Silva
z Grace Winchell, Chairman pro tem Wes Bannister
x Roger Stanton —Dan R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Medea, Chairman _Roland E. Sigonger
x Iry Pickler, Chairman pro tem Fred Hunter
z Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
_Wayne Wedin z Ron Isles
\„,/ DISTRICT NO. 14: Peer A. Swan, Chairman x Darryl Miller
7—Ursula Kennedy, Chai man pro tem —Richard B. Edgar
7—Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
-7—Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran
x Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera
2
05/10/89
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P.
Anderson, William N. Clarke, Thomas
M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle,
Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges, John Linder,
Bob Ooten, Rich von Langen, Chuck Winsor,
Jack Vincent, Ray Young
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark
Ide, Pervaiz Anwar, Jamel Demir, Conrad
Hohener, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, Bill
Fleming, Tom Mossinger, Gregory S. Keeler
e t x t f • x x e e :t t x
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excerpt
from t e osta Mesa Sanitary That the minute excerpt from the Costa
District Mesa Sanitary District re appointment of
alternate Director, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed, as follows:
District Active Director Alternate Director
i
6 James A. Wahner Harry S. Green
DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1.
It was then moved: That Director Robert Hanson be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled
i
and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hanson as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Dan Griset be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Griset as
Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
C airman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary -
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2.
It was then moved: That Director A. B. "Buck" Catlin be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Catlin as
Chairman. l I
It was further moved: That Director William D. Mahoney be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations,
the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Mahoney as Chairman pro tem.
-3-
05/10/89
DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
j Boards of Directors, the Secretary
�.J declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3.
It was then moved: That Director Richard T. Polis be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
- polled and. the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Polis as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Carrey Nelson be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote
was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Nelson as
Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
hairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5.
It was then moved: That Director John C. Cox, Jr. be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Cox as Chairman.
_ It was further moved: That Director Donald A. Strauss be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations,
the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Strauss as Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual elect on of Chal man and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6.
i
It was then moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chai man. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled
and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Ruthelyn Plummer be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote
was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Plummer as
Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7.
... 4
05/10/89
It was then moved: That Director Don E. Smith be nominated as a candidate for
111111I the office of Chai man. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled
and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Smith as Chairman. \ //
It was further moved: That Director Richard B. Edgar be nominated as a candidatE
for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote
was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Edgar as
Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary -
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11.
It was then moved: That Director Tom Mays be nominated as a candidate for the
office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and
the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Mays as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Grace Winchell be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote
was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winchell as
Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 13 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13.
It was then moved: That Director Henry W. Wedaa be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled
and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wedaa as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Iry Pickler be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Pickler as
Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 14 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
hairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14.
It was then moved: That Director Peer A. Swan be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman. Director Iry Pickler was also nominated but declined the
nomination. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the
Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Swan as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Ursula E. Kennedy be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations,
the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Kennedy as Chairman pro tem.
-5-
05/10/89
I DISTRICT 5 In the absence of Chairman John C. Cox,
Appointment of Chairman pro tem Jr. and Chairman pro tem Donald
! A. Strauss, Director Evelyn Hart was
appointed Chairman pro tem of District No. S.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported on the
Repor o t e Joint Chairman Directors' orientation and plant tour
conducted by staff the previous week
which was structured specifically for the newer Directors. It included a review
of the Districts' , Boards' and staff organizational structures and their various
activities. Staff also presented an overview of the various environmental and
public health programs, personnel matters, and financing and budget procedures of
the Districts. Chairman Smith indicated very favorable comments had been received
from the 14 Directors that attended the orientation and tour.
The Joint Chairman then noted that the Board had previously been sent a
memorandum from Director Hank Wedaa with regard to the Annual Meeting and
Exhibition of the Air 8 Waste Management Association to be held in Anaheim on
June 25 through 30. Mr. Smith commented that this conference would provide a
good opportunity for the Directors to learn about evolving air quality issues
that will affect the Districts, their cities, the County and virtually everyone.
Accordingly, Directors would be reimbursed for the registration cost if they
wished to attend.
Director Bob Siefen, who is also Vice Chairman of the Solid Waste Management
Commission, then briefly addressed the Board relative to the proposed revised
County Solid Waste Plan. He advised that the Commission had just spent 14 months
revising the plan which was recently forwarded for approval by the Directors'
respective cities. ye urged Directors to support and help get the proposed plan
approved. He noted that they must receive 51% approval before it may be
submitted to the State. If they don't receive the necessary approval , it will
return to the Commission for further revisions and the process would then have to
begin all over again.
Chairman Smith then noted that the joint Boards would be adjourning that evening
to Wednesday, May 17th, at 7:30 p.m. , at the Garden Grove Community Center, for a
i public hearing on the "Action Plan" Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
He also reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on
Thursday, May 18th, at 5:30 p.m.
The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for
Wednesday, May 24th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Charles Sylvia and Wayne
Wedin to attend and participate in the discussions.
Chairman Smith also noted that Districts Nos. 5 and 6 would be adjourning to
Wednesday, May 31st, District 1 to Thursday, June 1st, and District 11 to
Wednesday, June 7th, to consider modifications to their supplemental user fee
programs for 1989-90.
Chairman Smith advised Directors that nominations for the annual election of
Joint Chairman would be accepted at the June Board meeting, with election at the
July meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman will be at the
regular July meeting.
...
-6-
05/10/89
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Smith reported that at
Recognl on of Industrial Discharger, its annual conference in April , the
Aluminum Precision Products for California Water Pollution Control /
receiving PCA award of for
Association (CWPCA) had presented an
award of excellence to Aluminum
Precision Products, an Orange County firm that discharges under permit into the
Districts' sewage system. The purpose of the award is to stimulate interest on
the part of industry to take positive steps to meet strict water pollution
control standards. This firm, nominated by the Districts' Industrial Waste
Division inspectors,, was recognized for their efforts over the past year to
comply with discharge requirements and foster an awareness in the business
community for the need to control industrial wastewater to help protect public
health and the environment.
The Joint Chairman then recognized Mr. Greg Keeler, Manufacturing Manager of
Aluminum Precision Products. Chairman Smith then presented the award of
excellence to Mr. Keeler, recognizing their efforts over the past year to comply
with the Districts' discharge requirements. On behalf of the Boards of
Directors, Chairman Smith commended the firm and expressed the Boards'
appreciation for their efforts.
Mr. Keeler thanked the Boards for the recognition. He noted that his firm had
worked very hard and invested a lot of money and effort in their treatment system
In order to comply with the Districts' requirements.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented further on
Repor of the General Manager the new Directors' orientation/plant
tour held on May 3rd. He advised
Directors that may have been unable to attend, but still wished to tour the
plants, to contact staff and they would be happy to arrange a tour at the
Directors' convenience.
Mr. Sylvester then briefly commented on the public hearing on the "Action Plan"
Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and
Disposal Facilities Master Plan scheduled for May 17th. The purpose of the
meeting is to hear public comments on the EIR which is part of the Districts'
30-year "Action Plan". Fallowing the hearing, the Boards will direct staff and
consultants to take both written and oral comments into account and respond to
them in the Final Program EIR which will be presented to the Boards for their
consideration at an adjourned Joint meeting on July 19th. At that meeting the
Boards will also make a determination on the appropriate wastewater management
program for the Districts and the terms of application to the Environmental
Protection Agency and California Regional Water Quality Control Board for renewal
of the Districts' NPDES ocean discharge permit for the next five-year period.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that staff
Report of the ueneral counsel and he had been working on a new
Industrial Waste Ordinance for the
Districts for over a year. A draft of the document was reviewed by the Executive
Committee at their April meeting. He then commented on the proposed ordinance
which will be submitted to the Boards for first reading in the near future.
-7-
05/10/89
Mr. Woodruff also reported on the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies'
Conference in New York the previous week, which he attended along with the
General Manager. He advised that Mr. Jim Elder, the key person heading up EPA' s
Division of Enforcement, addressed AMSA's Legal Affairs Committee. His message
was very clear that EPA is serious about enforcement of their pretreatment
program requirements. Their initial enforcement program is currently underway.
EPA can take enforcement actions against industries even if the local POTW
(publicly-awned treatment works) has not taken any action. They have indicated
that they will be tough on both industries and POTW's. On August 31st the
Environmental Protection Agency, by national press release, will itemize every
company or POTW upon which they will be assessing monetary fines, or filing
Judicial actions because of noncompliance with their pretreatment program.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered
i that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held April 12, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meeting held April 27, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments
�✓ Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held April 12, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-8-
05/10/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ra ification of a ent of Joint
and Individual District taims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages "A" and
"B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, l f
and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. `..�
4/12/89 4/26/89
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 562,165.34 $1,189,096.87
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,206,902.25 255,754.16
Joint Working Capital Fund - 129,639.99 246,122.13
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 101,989.95 7,937.36
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 3.50 -0-
DI TRAIL N7�L0. - 1,726.88 111,434.47
DI RICT N0. - 9,805.51 49,835.79
DI TRICT NO. 5 - 82,502.51 6,512.22
DI TR-3 ICT N0. 6 - -0- 292.87
DIDI TRH. 77 - 77,991.25 54,863.98
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 183.26 7,920.31
DI TROT-NO. - -O- -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 _ 1,137.50 948.19
DISTRICT N 5 & 6 JOINT 29,209.25 7,657.31
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,816.56 32.74
DISTRICTS NO5. 7 & 14 JOINT - 428.42 3,470.41
3,2 6,5 2.17 1,942,678.81
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase of Safety
Breathing Res iratory Systems, That the bid tabulation and
ec fication N2. E-1 7 to Pacific recommendation re award of Purchase of
Safety quipment ompany Safety Breathing Respiratory Systems,
Specification No. E-187, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Pacific Safety
Equipment Company for the total amount of $81,431.00 plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing s aff to issue a
purchase order contract to That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
Munici a1 Industrial Sates Com an to negotiate and issue a purchase order
for purchase of zierpentix Conveyor contract to Municipal Industrial Sales
Re lacement Parts and Materials Company in an amount not to exceed -
Specif cation No. -188 $41,500.00, plus sales tax and shipping
charges, for purchase of Serpentix
Conveyor Replacement Parts and Materials (Specification No. E-188).
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff t0 issue Change
Order No. 1 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby,
No. 38045 issued to Sierra Copy authorizied to issue Change Order No. 1
for printing "Action Plan" Draft to Purchase Order No. 38045 issued to
EIR Sierra Copy for additional printing
services required to print "Action Plan"
Draft EIR on Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, increasing
the total authorized amount from $3,995.00 to $4,386.54, including tax and
shipping charges.
-9-
05/10/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin an a rder No. 7 o he
ions and s ecif cations for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans and
jJob NO. J-7-4 specifications for Administration
�..✓ Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4,
authorizing an addition of $22,409.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts
Corporation for modification of ten free-standing pilasters, additional framing of
the walls and roof of the second floor, additional tresses under second floor,
rerouting of 22-inch HVAC duct and Chiller Building drain, additional posts to
stiffen curtain and window walls and for a 20-year bond to guarantee the roof
against leaks, be, and is hereby, approved.
• ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change [
der No. 15 o
the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 15 to the plans
• Job No. J-15 and specifications for Ocean Outfall
Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15, authorizing an addition of $5,376.00 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. for upgrading existing circuit transformers in the 12 kv
Service Center and additional safety handrailing at the Booster Station, be, and
Is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 3 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
Job No. J-15A specifications for Prepurchase and
Installation of Variable Frequency Drive
Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15A, authorizing an addition of $3,990.00 to the contract with General
Electric Company for fabrication and installation of vibration monitors as a
safety measure for protection of the five 2600 hp electric pump motors, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to e
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
Job No. J-16 specifications for Lighting Conservation
Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job
No. J-16, authorizing a net addition of $43,398.00 to the contract with Pacific
Electric, Inc. for eight items of miscellaneous modifications and additional work;
granting a time extension of 48 calendar days for completion of said additional
work; and assessment of liquidated damages for late completion of the project, be,
and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Job No. J-15 as complete
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 89-42, accepting Lighting Conservation Facilities at Plants 1
and 2, Job No. J-16, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion
and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
\� -10-
05/10/89
i
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin Chan a Order No. 17 to
he plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 17 to the plans
Job NOS. P1-20 and P1-31 and specifications for Headworks No. 2
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and
Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleancuts;
and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of
j $36,864.59 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for construction of a
containment wall at the foul air/chemical area; modifications to HVAC circuit in
Power Building 3A and frame and cover at Sunflower Pump Station; installation of
concrete beam at Tunnel No. 1; installation of nine conduits across roadway;
modification of the type of concrete block required; and removal of an undisclosed
concrete structure, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change rder No. 1 to
the plans antl specifications for That Change Order No. 12 to the plans
Job Nos. FI-25, PS-26 P2-31 and specifications for Covers for
PZ-JJ and P -34 Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and
Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A"
Job No. P2-34, authorizing a net addition of $72,969.50 to the contract with
Advanco Constructors, Inc. for modifications to foul air ducting, the addition of
tunnel covers and stairs for added safety, and deletion of aluminum covers, walks
and railings over Distribution Boxes "A", "B" and "Cu to be completed under a
separate project in the future, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
tans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
ob No. P1-27 specifications for Entrances, Site and
Security and Interior Road Improvements
at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-27, authorizing a net deduction of $15,791.20 to the
contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for substitution of road surface material ,
utility modifications and undisclosed obstructions, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS
Rea ection of bitls for Specification
Nos. R-033-i R-033-2 and Job
No. P -40 and authorizing General
Manager to combine work with
upcoming projects
Receive and file letter from Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Fleming Engineering, Inc.
That the letter from Fleming
Engineering, Inc. dated April 24, 1989, requesting that they be allowed to
withdraw their bid for Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1,
Specification No. R-033-1; Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 2,
Specification No. R-033-2; and Instrumentation Improvements at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-40, due to a mathematical error, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed.
-11-
05/10/89
Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried:
emorandum
That the General Counsel 's
Memorandum dated May 2, 1989, regarding rejection of bids for Fuel System
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-033-1; Fuel System
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-033-2; and Instrumentation
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-40, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed.
I
A rovin re nest of Flemin Moved, seconded and duly carried:
n neerin Inc. far wi drawal
' of their bid That the request of Fleming
Engineering, Inc. for withdrawal of
their bid for Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification
No. R-033-1; Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 2, Specification
No. R-033-2; and Instrumentation Improvements at Plant No. 2, Jab No. P2-40,
be, and is hereby approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the bid bond submitted in connection with said bid be,
and is hereby, exonerated.
Rejecting all bids and authorizing Moved, seconded and duly carried:
eneral Manager to combine work
with upcoming projects That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 89-43,
receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation; rejecting all bids
for Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-033-1; Fuel
System Improvements at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-033-2; and
Instrumentation Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-40; and authorizing
the General Manager to combine said work with similar upcoming projects to
be bid in the future. A certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby
withUr—ban Alternatives re adopt Resolution No. 89-44, approving
Districts' Community Outreach Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
Program Services Agreement with Urban
Alternatives for public participation
consulting services required in connection with the Districts' Community Outreach
Program, providing for a reallocation of the costs for said services among the
various categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized
compensation of $170,544.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
o_ negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is
Professional Services reent hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
with Brown antl al welAme
onsulting No. 4 to the Professional Services
Engineers re Job No. J-19 Agreement with Brown and Caldwell
Consulting Engineers for design of
Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, to provide for design of a steam
turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of engine
heat to produce additional electricity.
-12-
05/10/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with Brown and Caldwell That the Selection Committee
Consulting Engineers for planning, certification of the final negotiated
design and construction services re fee relative to the Professional
Jobs Nos. J-11-1 J-2 J-27 Services Agreement with Brown and
P2-2 -5-1 P2-35-2 P2-35-3 Caldwell Consulting Engineers for
PZ-J5-4 and P - 5-5 planning, design and construction
services In connection with
master-planned support facilities at Plants 1 and 2,
to include the fallowing, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved:
° Rehabilitation and Conversion of Existing
Laboratoryat Plant No. 1 to Office Space,
Job No. J-11-1
° Personnel Building at Plant No. 1,
Job No. J-26
° Demolition and Removal of Abandoned
Structures at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-27
° Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2,
Jab No. P2-23-5-1
° Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-35-2
° Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-35-3
° Construction Management Office at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-35-4
° Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-45,
approving said agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for said
services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a maximum amount not to exceed
$865,000.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
j part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and deny claim of
Thomas J. Mendez That the claim of Thomas J. Mendez dated
April 10, 1989, in the amount of $626.79
plus tax for damage to his motorcycle allegedly caused by excess sand and gravel
at stop sign by grit chamber at Plant 1, be, and is hereby, received, ordered
filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts,
General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action.
-13-
05/10/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve wri en
report of the Executive committee That the written report of the Executive
Committee's meeting on April 26, 1989,
be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Executive Committee
to approve a reements for services That the Executive Committee be, and is
and acquisition of air emission hereby, authorized to approve, for
credits to comply with S AQMD execution by the General Manager,
requirements for the proposed agreements for specialized professional
0 m9d primary treatment expansion consulting services; testing and
of Reclamation Plant No. 1 analytical services; procurement of
materials, equipment and services for
Installation and operation of facilities for pilot
scale testing; and acquisition of air emission
credits pursuant to new source review regulations,
to comply with SCAQMD requirements for the proposed
60 mgd primary treatment expansion of Reclamation
Plant No. 1.
ALL DISTRICTS
Ac ions re im lementation of
Emp oyee ommuter Program required
by SCAQMD Rule 1bu3
Authorizing the General Mana er to Moved, seconded and duty carried:
file the proposed Employee omnuter
Program with SCAQMD, and to That the General Manager be, and is
im lament said grogram upon hereby, authorized to file the
approya by AQMD proposed Employee Commuter Program
with SCAQMD, and to implement said
program, subject to approval by SCAQMD and approval by the Boards of
Directors of recommended vanpooling and fleet vehicle conversion to
clean-burn fuel program elements.
Authorizing staff and General Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Counsel to investigate alternatives
on the vanpooling program element That the staff and General Counsel
be, and are hereby, authorized to
investigate alternatives, including potential liability exposure, and submit
a recommendation for consideration by the Boards of Directors on the
vanpooling program element.
Authorizing staff to investigate Moved, seconded and duly carried:
alternat ves on the conversion of
fleet vehicles to clean-burn fuel That staff be, and is hereby,
program element authorized to investigate
alternatives and submit a
recommendation for consideration by the Boards of Directors on the
conversion of fleet vehicles to clean-burn fuel program element.
. r
-14-
05/10/89
Tabling consideration Of Dayment One element of the staff's proposed
for bus passes for employees_ using Employee Commuter Program to comply
i ublic transportation to commute to with SCAQMD Rule 1503 includes an
work as part of Districts' Employee incentive for employees to ride publi,..,/
Commuter Program re compliance with transportation to work by offering to
SCAQMD Rule 1503 reimburse the monthly cost up to $28
for bus passes.
' Directors inquired as to whether computer information would be available
prior to authorizing payment for the bus passes to determine if there would
be a significant number of new riders or if only existing bus riders would
benefit.
Staff reported that in June 1988 an employee commuter survey was conducted
with the assistance of the Orange County Transit District which indicated
there were only eight potential employees that could use the public
transportation system. At the present time, one employee uses the bus on a
i part-time basis.
Directors also discussed the possibility of charging employees for parking
spaces to encourage car pooling or the use of the public transportation
system. The General Counsel pointed out that such a proposal would probably
be subject to the meet-and-confer process.
It was then moved and seconded: That purchase of bus passes or
reimbursement of cost for up to $28 per month for employees using this form
of public transportation to commute to work be authorized as part of the
Districts' Employee Commuter Program for complying with SCAQMD's Rule 1503.
Following further discussion during which several Directors indicated their
opposition to the motion authorizing purchase of bus passes for employees, a
substitute motion was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That consideration of a motion authorizing purchase of bus passes or
reimbursement of cost for up to $28 per month for employees using this form
of public transportation to commute to work as part of the Districts'
Employee Commuter Program for complying with SCAQMD Rule 1503, be, and is
hereby, tabled.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Waste Minimization
Pro ram to be incor orated into That the Waste Minimization Program,
revised .W. r inance outlined in the Staff Report dated
April 20, 1989, be, and is hereby,
approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to incorporate its
provisions into the revised Industrial Waste Ordinance now under preparation. _
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Pentlin lassification and
om ensation ResolulEion No. 9- 0 That the Boards of Directors hereby
as amended, establishing a 1989 adopt Resolution No. 89-46, Amending
Summer Work Program Classification and Compensation
Resolution No. 79-20, as amended,
establishing a 1989 Summer Work Program for painting and grounds maintenance wor�
A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
-15-
05/10/89
i
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Final upplement No. 2
to Joint Treatment Works Wastewater
�J Master Plan Environmental Impact
Report
Verbal staff report The Districts' Director of
Engineering reported that the
action before the Boards was to approve the Final Supplement No. 2 to the
Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report
which addresses the impact of constructing the two additional digesters
included in Job No. P1-34-1, Digesters Nos. 11 - 16 and Gas Handling
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1.
He advised that two comments were received after the close of the public
comment period from State agencies; however, their comments did not directly
relate to the project. They addressed the development of a sludge
management program and SCAQMD air quality management plan conformity issues.
Mr. Dawes noted that this project is contingent upon approval by the South
Coast Air Quality Management District; therefore, that issue has been
addressed.
Receive and file Staff Report and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
umnary
That the Staff Report and Summary
dated May 1, 1989, re Final Supplement No. 2 to Joint Treatment Works
Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed.
Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly carried:
received after the public hearing
That the following written comments
received after the public hearing on April 12, 1989, be, and are hereby,
received and filed:
Comments Received From Dated
California Regional Water Quality Control Board April 17, 1989
State of California, Office of Planning and Research April 24, 1989
State Water Resources Control Board,
Division of Loans and Grants April 18, 1989
Receive, file and approve Final Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Supplement No. 2 t0 Joint Treatment
Works Wastewater Master Plan That the Final Supplement No. 2 to
Environmental Impact Report Joint Treatment Works Wastewater
Master Plan Environmental Impact
Report be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby certify that said Final
Supplement No. 2 to Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan
Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the State
and Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as amended.
-16-
05/10/89
j Certifying Final Supplement No. 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
to the Joint Treatment orks Waste-
water Master Plan Environmental That the Boards of Directors hereby
Impact Report adopt Resolution No. 89-47,
certifying Final Supplement No. 2 to
the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact
Report; making certain findings in connection therewith; adopting a
statement of overriding considerations; and authorizing filing of a Notice
of Determination re said project. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment -
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17,
1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden
Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the
lams and s eclfications for That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
Contract No. -14R specifications for Santa Ana River
Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation,
Contract No. 2-14R, transmitting minor revisions to the plans, be, and is hereby,
approved.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awar n ontract No. -14R to
ancon Engineering, Inc. That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 89-48-2. receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Santa Ana
River Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 2-14R, to Sancon
Engineering, Inc. in the total amount of $312,550.00. A certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive file and deny claim of
raig R. and Darralyn A. larke re That the claim of Craig R. and Darralyn
Contract No. 2-26 A. Clarke dated April 11, 1989, in the
amounts of $1,500,000 and $150,000,
respectively, for general damages, plus medical damages and lost earnings in
undetermined amounts, allegedly resulting from an industrial accident in
connection with construction of Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Contract
No. 2-26, which was awarded and is being administered by the City of Anaheim, be,
and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the District's
General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and the City of
Anaheim for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17,�.)
1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden
Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989.
-17-
05/10/89
1 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 7 to the
! - lams and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans and
Con ract No. 5- 9 specifications for Replacement of
Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and
Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29, authorizing an addition of $84,274.00 to the
j contract with W. H. Ebert Corporation for additional work due to undisclosed
utilities and obstructions, and for alignment adjustments, be, and is hereby,
approved.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 8 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans and
ontract N0. 5-29 specifications for Replacement of
Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and
Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29, authorizing an addition of $119,854.00 to the
i contract with W. H. Ebert Corporation for additional work to realign a City of
Newport Beach water line due to undisclosed utilities and obstructions, and
granting a time extension of 29 calendar days for completion of said additional
work, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 9 to the
lams and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 9 to the plans and
ontract No. 5-29 specifications for Replacement of
Portions of Coast Highway Farce Main and
Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29, authorizing adjustment of engineer's quantities
for a net deduction of $6,804.00 from the contract with W. H. Ebert Corporation,
be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Contract No. 5-29
as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 89-49, accepting
Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract
No. 5-29, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and
approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17,
1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden
Grave, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Atl ournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17,
1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden
Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then
`.✓ declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989.
-18-
05/10/89
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file request for
annexation re proposed Annexation_ That the request from Mr. and
No. ITT - Nowling Annexation Mrs. Richard Nowling for annexation of /
1.17 acres to the District located in �.../
the vicinity of Orange Park Boulevard and Amapola Avenue in unincorporated County
territory, be, and 1s hereby, received, ordered filed and referred to staff for
study and recommendation (proposed Annexation No. 131 - Nowling Annexation to
County Sanitation District No. 7).
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17,
1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden
Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17,
1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden
Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17,
1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Roam A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden
Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10, 1989.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
djournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17,
1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden
Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. , May 10. 1989.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to
issue purchase order to Wilson's That the General Manager be, and is
Equipment Rentals, Inc. for hereby, authorized to issue a purchase
Contract No. 3-21-1R1 order to Wilson's Equipment Rentals,
Inc. in the amount of $32,655.39 for
Trench Repair, Westside Relief Interceptor, Contract No. 3-21-1R1.
19 �`/
05/10/89
DISTRICT 3
Public Hearing re proposed
- Ordinance No. 310
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
open at 8:23 p.m.
Close Public Hearing There being no public oral comments,
the Chairman declared the hearing
closed at 8:24 p.m.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. J1U That proposed Ordinance No. 310, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 306 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities and
Repealing Ordinance No. 308, be read by title only; and,
I
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and
is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 310 by title only.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting Ordinance No. JIU following roll call vote:
AYES: Richard T. Polis, Chairman, Edward L. Allen, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Norman
E. Culver, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, John Kanel , William D. Mahoney,
i James Neal , Carrey Nelson, Iry Pickler, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Roger R.
Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Edna Wilson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Wes Bannister
That Ordinance No. 310, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 306 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities and
Repealing Ordinance No. 308, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 3
ctions relative to continuation o
appeal of Beatrice Hunt-Wesson
Foods re Industrial Waste Permit
No. 3-1-143 to June 14, 1989
i
Receive and file letter of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson
That the letter of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson
Foods dated April 14, 1989, re continuation of appeal hearing re Industrial
Waste Permit No. 3-1-143 from May 10, 1989 to June 14, 1989, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed.
I
-20-
05/10/89
i
Receive file and a rove General Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ounsel s emorandum and letter
i That the General Counsel ' s
Memorandum dated April 17, 1989, and letter dated April 17, 1989, to
Joel S. Moskowitz, Esq. re continuation of appeal hearing re Industrial
Waste Permit No. 3-1-143 from May 10, 1989 to June 14, 1989, be, and are
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
Author izin continuation of appeal Moved, seconded and duly carried:
of Beatrice un -Wesson Foods to
June 14, 1989 That the appeal of
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson Foods be, and
is hereby, continued to June 14, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , in the District's
Administrative Office, or as soon thereafter as it may be heard.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A ournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , May 17,
1989, at the Garden Grove Community Center, Room A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden
Grove, for a public hearing on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report on
the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:26 p.m. , May 10, 1989.
5ecre ary, boarasuof Directors
i County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-21-
FUND NO 9199 . JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/05169 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGE CDUN IT
CLAIM 0110 24112109POSTING DATE W 12 B9
-i
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT A DESCRIPTION
09F886 AGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 58.204.4E ENGINEHRING SERVICES DIST 5
09Fb87 ANC INCORPORATED $427.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
09l P8B ACME WELpI MI 53.985.60 TRAILER MAIM
098889 ADAMSON UNIFOPM L EGUIP. $97.35 SAVER SUPPLIES
' 09PR90 ROY A NCO CON37_DICTCTORB. INC. 575.451.95 CONSTRUCTION 7-10-1
E9R891 ALL AMERICAN ASFHALT 531.27 ASPHALT
0986T2 ALLEN ELECTRIC CO. $9.835.30 PLOW INDICATOR
.op oq} _AL IEO C RONICS $109.06 INSTRUMENT PARS
P 9P894 1MER CAN TECHNICAL BUFFET $1.719.11 - --- --_- - UPPIC6 SUPPLIES -----
098F95 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $2.314.19 MECHANICAL PARTS
_ r9 FE96 BLAKE P. ANOEFSON $121 50 __ T BANG
BUYING MUSE
C 9P E97 ANGELUS PACIFIC CO. $143.10 PERNPERS
092096 ANTHOMV.S MECH. L MACHINE, INC 5800.19 MECHANICAL PARTS
PCRP99 gPDY iRNs,Y ARDlES A FODPPPFNT 31.151.1E _, ____._._ .. TOOLS
098900 RALPH W. ATKINSON 5127.91 PUMP PARTS -
R9P901 ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY $29.00 SUBSCRIPTION
_ Fn r5R9R2_._AD0la-MEO.RECOPTING 9EP.VICE saa,at - _ _ VIDEO TAPES
X I9E96T AUTO WEIGHUTRO CO. $576.47 INSTRUMENT PART
= GgPggs RRl INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, .733.44 PLAQUES-
09P905 9C ISAFETRI AL ST R 4 __ _ SAFETY
PARTS _
.a0.•W 09P906 BAN SAFETY L GALLERY
$190.62 FRAMES SOPPLI88
P98907 BACKSTREET GALLERY $190.82 PUBLIC
P9f90R BAN e0 i- THEY CO. 51$9.55 PUBLICATION
1 b9P9V9 PAN. OF APF9I CA-C.ASOC. 59.55 CONSTRUCTIONCSERV
` 1 09F911 P.W. RAR0T71 AND ASSOC. i5.2P0.0 C. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-25626,P2-32,33.34,37 _
-_ 1--• rgrgtt _ TRUCK PARTS
C98912 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS S3082.66 LAB SUPPLIES
-` IS8913 BEACON BAT ENTERPRISES. INC. 5657.90 CAR WASHES ,
' n9R91a -_RDPFRT Rrm.MIn uN Fo n9♦ a eA AT,nl_T> __ . .. _.._ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-31,32,33,34.29
09P915 BENT ENGINEER INS. INC. $69.19 NLCPANICAL PARTS
- v98916 BIDCTCLE 355.9I SUBSCRIPTION
91Y _ FnTIF EA. _. _—_--_ORRICE SUPPLIES
19P91B MARILYN BOOTH 5539.23 MUTING EXPENSE
'- 0Ppg19 RALPH BOYER $62.30 REGISTRATION
"P892i1— ._IREMLMyFTFEx FR a ASSIIC.�ENC- A4A_tA _._ _. .__. . NBCRANIr•• PARTS _ ___
P9F521 9RITPI"EE ELECTRIC 511.280.i7 PUNP PARTS
f 5f a2i PRGOKS PRODUCTS iB.130.E0 VAULTS
^Bi 925 8 'NiCALJ'Pr, APsn_-•
P9E92s B"OUR
L CALDWELL CONSULTING $61.402.46 BWGINEERING SCBVIC85 P2-37.79.P1-35.3-19 „
09E92F BUENA PAR LU MEER L HARDWARE $21.-49 BUILDING MATERIALS
u.
__rgarnr — yr _ .9..TA_g.___._ ..
POBLIEATIO N79 AP
Tv TRRI ALS
9E927 VUSIN O. INC. f2 .V EPIC¢ SUPPLIES 09P9 G. STREED SBN4.q} BETTY CASH EEIMBURS@ffH
-4 r -L e rn _____ --- _ QA IfAIPAM
09P930 CST-CALTROL 577.2E METER EEIR
09E931 C.Y.G.CJ. f1.5439O CONFERENCE
RECISTPARON
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/05/89 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 04/12/89 POSTING DATE 04/12/89
-�-YeGGeYT Yn-___ __�yENnne pMll nrt _�IIFSrR 1GT1nY
09F932 CAL-CMEM SALES 5201.64 HARDWARE
.9141- ft .r-I LSR
' 098934 CALLY CURTIS CO. f80.98 VIDEO
1. ne0e35 CAPITAL WESTWARD 5828.80 ABCHANICAL PARTS
ee. FTnY_ENcrYrrRA -leY-ca _ - _ _ _ EHGIFH;¢glyG.-$gBEinn_9_v_A0101
1-0937 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $1.627.76 PHONE EQUIPMENT
C9N9SE CENTURY SAFETY JUST. 6 SUFF. $1.378.16 SAPRTY SUPPLIES
Kea - ru FNWEST pxn clopre-]ur_ •v.eea-�c__ ,_-_, - _-_ RTC, rmnomv w n .L_O9-8R
". 098R40 CMESSELL CORP. $295.79 CHARTS
09P!41 A.Y. CHESTER70K CO. f1.5111.27 PUMP TESTING
' •RN-CONSYWSON S n 121.50
5 -.-.— - ENSE ZL
0-6-44 COAST T CLA YSON f21.5C OFFIIEGTETPSNRA
0!E!s4 COAST TECH COMPUTERS f2.522.0P OFFICE BQEIPI�MT -
"' 09P946 COMPRESSOR COMPONENi3 OF CALIF $549.67 COMPUTER
09 P.947 COMPUTER DA TA CON i589.67 COMPUTER PARTS
.. LONNEL4JLN.ILRIS A OJ"- _ u._ca _.__.- _-_ __-ELECTRICRSU --__
396949 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL OI ST. f1 3113.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
'2 r98950 CONSOLIDATED 4EVR OE ApFNIC3 .... .. BLUEPRINTING
LGS TAIL' •256 •4 ---------. CLALB
098952 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY f25R.95 ENGINE C M.D. 5-13- -
;.j-I 09E953 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES 31.—4903.28 ENGINE O. 5-13-07 J-13A
09P954 BOP-E. COULTER;O-.SNP PREN $925.7.-- FIND?
-y C9E955 R. E. COULTER CRANE ELECTRIC
5915.75 P@B PARTS
a,l 99P954 COUNTY WHOLESALE EL ECTPiC f365.39_ O.ECTRIC PARTS
N- 096958 ---CALAWATER -EAOWL-FY�O. i888.9O-___ .-..- . StUrraARTS __•:
098959 STATE
WATER f00.T4 APPLIC EQUIAPPLICATION
mEtTir
FEE
990959 STATE OF CA HIGHWAY PATROL $40O.CO APPL[C-MATS P8¢
.. .- �.-0...-- _
.,a� R;•IENT--0E-6ENGP#L-REAVICFR •^^ "_ _ -___ . . .__ __. SAYBFK-MAiBRIALR
P!P961 CIATEC POLYMERS f4.950.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES
tl.0.8-10-0R
v.
C 9P9E2 OIFIL iF PO ASSOCIATES -2 31.6.76 ORRICE SIRPLIES
..- 098DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. iNF. — S5.SE6.g4._.._ _FLANT MAINTENANCE
6
_ 090964 DUNAD0 BRADSTREEF3. INC. 35.605.Dr PLANT NA"GISCRC¢ 6 eRPAIA
O SE 9b5 DUNN 8 BAAOSTREET f300.04 SQIltlAR 6ECISteATION
- &9F966--._-_— OL PONTCO., SAFETY •192 5P-- _..--BOOKS OPPLF6R
O 9f 967 DL' PNT CO. CO.SAFETY SERVICES f192.39 30E83 ,.
996960 SIVSLS SALES CO. f68.46 YITf[NGS
b96970 EAGLE
ENTERPRISE. H61..i - ------HARDWARE �P8PAIA- -
f!8971 EAGLE ENTERPRISES $551:2.87 OFFICES
•� r9S971 E45 THAN. INC.T f172.87 ENGINE SUPPLIES
-.--.969i2--_--- --rmEpsoh INDUSTGF.-.IP._ .____ ._- 971.0(--_._____ .._- _.�16[N¢BRING-b8RVF6E6-DIGT-2614--.__.__.
E 9E973 FME P.SDO IMOUS TPIRL CONTROLS 3}.973.62 DRIVE UNITS
f9P974 ENCHANTER. INC. f4.200.9n OCEAMOGWHIC SERVICES M.O.M.0.6-10-87
• EEERIEG-68R9[GEb-X86
098976 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. f260.00 LAB 07-i58--- ------ --=-F9i! —ENO NEE#-I-N" iEWOE-- PE -ENGINEERING
SERVICES
' 09F577 JOMN P. iALNENSTF IN F.C. f3.S3B.40 CONTkUCTION SERVICES J-7-4 6 3-20
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9105/B9 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
a
CLAIMS PAID 09 12 69 POSTING DATE 04/22/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT I DESCRIPTION
.` li
09P970 FEDERAL ENVELOPEY f ORRICE SUPPLIES
9 EXPRESS
CORP. $62,50 K1H FARIGHT
I 099 FILTER SUPPLYCO. f198.09 MECHANICALS PART
096901 B1 FISCNER i PORTER CO. s6.1T2.09 LAS SINATION PARTS
FTEHER SE
1'I SUPFLIES
09898 FLY SYSTEMS. INC. 6.0 JLLITOR SUPPLIES
098984 O-S STE TEMP $15.46 PUMP PARTS
GELBER S PUMPS, INC, $365,60
990956 FLUKE TECHNICAL CENTER.. 2257.63 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 1'
096987 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $8.297.09 BUILDING PERMIT6989en FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 6200,'0
'rl 09E9B9 DONALD L. FOX i ASSOCIATES f1.825.00 SAFM CONSULTING u.
C98990 NAG SYSTEMS / FOXBORO 6117.95 INSTRUMENT
n998tl99992e BiE6Nx R AGDFx.I Il Nu C. f958.92 IMMINENT HPA IB
C98993 6EOR6E LEECH ASSOCIATES i80122 ELECTRIC PUTS
E235 nR lixG BYVRNRR - MY AD
09E995 GIIILICH-MITCHELL. INC. f3.63C.48 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
09P996 OON GREEK L ASSOCIATES 53.903.7! ENGINEERING SERVICES 88-72
Ib 098998 HARBOUR ENGINEERING S50B2.72 MECHANICAL PARTS Iy
l� 09PS99 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $170.01 PUMP Pan 'y
° xncwex7EAT. PARTa
69-001 S. A. MEALY CO. S252.213.22 CONSTRUCTION PI-23R
�IW 09-0O2 HERPAN-PHINNEY•KODMUR $1.901.73 PUMP PARTS Im
Y h•1 FT7 oeE Keon nwwmw xecwmR
P'� 099009 HOEMBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. A INC. i1.263.11 COMPRESOR PARTS "
a.
099P05 MOUSE OF BATTERIES s699.60 BATTERIES
n •-n- Y ! f,._, .Y!_ 1 .1.A-11 _wG a11ww1Tan �.
i 09w007 CITY OF aHUNTINGTON PEACH $17.60 WATER USEAGE
099^"9B HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP 693.55 RUBBER STAMPS H
M
bed 099010 HURLEY ELECTRONICS. INC. $9.44 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
C99021 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,135.96 CONNECEORS �a
099P13 INGRAM PAPER $1,693.35 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
1'99E19 INSTITUTE FOR ROW. TECH. f1.580.10 VIDEOS lu
099CIS IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 19900 WATER USAGE •°
P99017 CHARLES A. JAM 5260.98 MEETING MUSE - TRAINING pr
P 99CI9 JOE•S SWEEPING'SERVICE $1.316.:0 STREET SWEEPING w'
099n2C JOHNSTONE SUPPLY f97.24 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ar
ur w.009. .._._..._. . aYC w. 114_,l. P 'T.C. W
099122 KEENAN SUPPLY $156.56 MECHANICAL PASTS y�
I , 099223 THE NE17H COMPANIES 614.225.5D ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35636
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/05189 PAGE 4
J REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 04/12/89 POSTING DATE 04/12/89
P99024 KING BEARING. INC. $10.880.67 MECHANICAL PARTS
US
099026 MARTIN KOROICK. SR f2.771.00 WESTBOCTION SERVICES 5-29631
099027 KRONNE AMERICA. INC. $1.193.64 INSTRUMENT
8— PARTS I°
099929 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS f431.04 CHLORINATION PARTS
09903E LEE S RO CONSULTING ENDR. $25.786.10 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33
BILL
SSO
111112 LEVIS PUBLISNERSa INC. f63.85 PUBLICATION
099053 LILLY TYPESETTING f127.20 PRINTING Iu
.ucran.mue
499035 M.P. LINDSTROM. INC. $13.602.85 CONSULTING SERVICES — MASTER PLAN
099036 LBRAIN PRODUCTS f1.47.3.80 RELIANCE POWER SERVICE AGREEMENT �
1° a 099038 MDS f52.98 INSTRUMENT PART
L`99C39 MPS f24.49 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
P99541 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. 5951.39 EFILM
NGINE
N"DC D99042 MALT OLM PIRNIE r INC.INC 511.938.01 ENGINEERING S¢BVIC¢S PI-25.26.P2-32,13,34 iv
.0
- R F SP
TTVC
099044 ANUFA . OFFICE SUPPLIES
0099P45 HATT CHEDR. INC. 4262.57 C® BNATION ?ARTS
A8T3
9^896 PCCBT SWEET ETA WORKS lI�aaY
tL66.82 -- --PAST PARTS
Iu!n 0998N MCNINLEY EQUIPMENT CORE 3266.82 CART PUTS Ir
�aa! I 099UAR MCR AS TER—CARR SUPPLY CO. 596.53 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES49
'a•
09995C MICROAGE COMPUTER $16,505.26 COMPUTER/SOFTWARH
Taal .99C51 MICROWAVE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS S204.74 ANTENNA
— ..•'2----�IBRHN—GRMIJr{B ING i% 394 S6 ----- --FRIIGK PABF6
C99^53 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $8,220.23 NBCLINICAL PARTS
Na 699 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. S1.550.00 VACUUM SERVICE
Nn 099356 NEAL SUPPLY CO. f2S9.90 PIPE FITTINGS
099057 NEWARK ELECTRONICS f5.096.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS
9060 NUM -- —ME6BR91{GAL SARF
,j 09• 59 O fi335020.6O0 TRAH REMOVAL
w DESSA BABBITT BEARING CO. 9 ENGINE PUTS099660 O ^.
�.
099062 THE OHMART.CORP• f123.46 CABLE --h
N.I P99P63 BIT"
C CHEMICAL CO. S28 a033.62 CHLORINE N.O. 10-12-68
h°I 099165 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY f711.17 ELECIBIC SUPPLIES µ:
h.� C99566 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. S224.76 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS t
099068 ORANGE VALVE S FITTING CO. $382.42 TIMINGS At
���� "99069 OSCAR-$ LOCK S SAFE S225.66 SECURITY d LOCHS M.
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/05/89 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 4 12189 POSTING DATE 04/12/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 0 DESCRIPTION
Is� 09907E OXYGEN SERVICE $485.96 SPECIALTY CASES
COUNTY f RANGE f 4 .45 DISPOSAL GATT PEN
0990T2 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS S100.000.00 PRBIRUN ADVANCE
099073 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $1,909.95 REMORSE NOG®e C01@ INgO m SIGN)
p 99074 PACs CC" SYSTEMS S19 06 ROMANS
w 099075 PACIFIC PARTS .e s2.268.10 INSTRIIMIEFT REPAIR
'rl 09-076 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $3,173.84 SAFETY SUPPLIES I;
C99077 _ _ PACT EL CELLULAR 699.12 JASTIRONE SSERVIC I
p 99079 PAK WEST 1594.95 OBIITORENT SERVICE
099979 PARKER PRODUCTIONS. INC. s94.95 9IDPA RENTAL
09e PA S
099081 PHOTO B SOUND CO. f75.26 RENTAL Eg01FMRNT
09%1,12 PICKWICK PAPER $739.54 PAPER PRODUCTS P_
0 R9 '85 PR
A Ell
S ET M C. f4 2 0 SLUDGE mom H.O.5-11-ag
P°j 099084 PY ENTERPPlS ESr INC. $595.72 SdPEi4 SUPPLIES
999C85 POLY FABRICS $438.84 PIPE
p 990R6 PO p RF in 9 g] CATIONIC PfILMRR M.OA-11-R]
".FYI 099C87 SHEPHERD $11.01 MECHANICAL PARTS
C99GSP HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE f66.00 ICE
GO 999090 RECTO. INC. f45.600.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O. 5-11-80
099091 RED WING SHOES $06.45 SAFETY SHOES
u
n 099093 RENEE ENGINEERING CO. S1_.174.48 MANHOLE COVERS Ir`
1 099P94 RICHARDS. WATSON. OREYFUSS S9.094.50 LEGAL SERVICES M
099096 RICHARD ROLFE $239.57 MEETING EXPENSE tt��
099097 ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY $185.57 ELECTRIC PARTS Ha
�" na9ne _ Iucmnwn* n
61
099999 RYAN-NERCO 606.0E RARDM RE a �"
099100 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. f66.40 PARTS CLEANER Iu'
099102 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT-L S99.112.03 OCEANOGRAPHIC RESSARCB M.0.8-10-BB
099103 SEA COAST DESIGNS 5168.54 OFFICE MACHINE"112
r.
p ' _
ra'uNeTRr n r
099106 SHAMROCK• INC. $391.80 HARDWARERT SOPPLIBS t`
099106 SHAMROCK SUPPLY f391.80 IIARWARE p
099298 SLIDE MAKERS WEST 633.00 SLIDE SERUM
099109 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1.870.43 TOOLS IV
199111 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $32:119.[4 AQMD FEES*Pr
` 099112 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. a9.410.iE POWER
L"I 099114 STARBUCK TRUCK REFINISHING 51.95C.OA VEeICLC REPAIR
099118 STAROW STEEL S531.58 METAL
Y.
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/05/89 PAGE 6
j REPORT NUMBER AP13
Ia CLAIMS PAID 01/12109 POSTING DATE 04/12/09
D
099116 STAR TOOL A SUPPLI CO. SIi915.23- TOOLS
099118 SUMMIT STEEL $1.616.56 MEYAL
099119 THE SUPPLIERS 94.116.80 YOOLS/RARDYAME
•� 099122 TeR TAKAMINE $2.440.06 CUNYRACT LANDSCAPING
C99122 TeYLOR-DU NN $516.65 =I PARTS
1fI 099124 TEKTRONIX. INC. 5184.00 INSTRUMENT MALES
099121 TELAUT0GRAPH CORPORATION S2.369.24 OFFICE McKIm („
b,
09112) TXOMAS TEMPORARIES 6330:36 TEMPORARY SERVICES
btl 099128 TRAVEL TRAVEL SIS43O.16 TRAVEL SERVICES n
winTRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY9 INC. $6.29 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES `
N•j 099131 IN UNSFECT $943.2- ROAD TESTING .-
000152 "`iR1NT.
X 099133 ULTRA SYSTEMS52.221.WC' ENGINEERING SERVICES
�• 24 09?]34 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3173.5/ PARCEL SERVICES
I]O 099136 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. :2.739.SC FITTINGS
�!� 09913) J.J. VAN HOUTEN 6 ASSOC . INC. 36.213.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES FLY 2
"N NBSTOANO R6INIIOGN Si1F OF — LAMP SFJIVifRS 1"
°ein 09?139 VARIAN ASSOCIATES. INC. 984.918.60 INSTRUMENT M.O. 12-14-88
N`I I 999196 RICHARD Y. VON LARGER $81.10 MEETING MUSE
N:. 1>•
099112 WAUKESHA-PEARCE IND..INC. $6,710.75 MECHANICAL PARTS
099113 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SEE. S1.760.DC LAR SERVICES X.
�1 ""-•'1-- WESfER•• "v--v.A-TE--eHf*itLAL 9"PPbV -^ '" -- CAIISYIC 600A 11 0 1-CO 8/
099145 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. "•5617.87 ELECRIC SUPPLI85
6,! CSO146 WILLOAN ASSOCIATES 5332.5; ENGINEERING SERVICES DIST 2 I.
!t3-AN9 ffifto of __ `••DSPORODUCt101>—
j 099118 XEROX CORP. 56.320.06 COPIER LEASES
{tl� 099119 EVERETT M. YORK CO. 5506.09 MECHANICAL PARTS
P- lSB ' RICH No YOUNG PROO wt ap YFTCR SUROLIIR
----------------- le'
4.1
coeeeexaeec acaea h,.
i.a w
N`
I.a k
If
It: •
POND NO 9199 - IT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/05/89 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER M43
j COONf4 SAMITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/12/89 POSTING DATE 04/12/89
�S a� OUNeY ARDEW I a
SI OPER PODS 4 3.50
I•! 42 OPER POND 345.63
:I 12 F/R POND 450.00 1�
P3 OPER FOES 7,913.47
T PO
93 P/R FFUN 1.725.00 +'
95 OPER POND _ 5.280.26
SS P/R PUD 53.43823 .71
"a P7 OPER POND 2,340.20
al R15,42L.05
�
9ll OPER FUND 183.26 p:•� 914 AC0 FUND 1,137.50
6 EH
i•�; 9566 ACO POND 28,727.94
0667 OPER POND 2,816.56
P+ 76 OPER FUND 429.42
ua X JT GPM FUND
6.1 CORP 206,902.25
2.101,989.95
CO ;n PON88D NORERR$FUND
INSUMNCR POND
JT WRKING CAPITAL POND 139.639.99 �a
oc V u:
Iac�
W-
I•:
b.
Iva
Iw '
FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/20199 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
BOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE E8UNF'
CLAIMS PAID 04/26/BT POSTING DATE 04/26/89
ARRANT NO. VENDOR BESERIPTION
�a
099169 NSL CONSULTING ENGINEERS fl•195.39 - LONG DISTANCE
EETEIEPS DIST 3
_LONG BISrANCB TELEPHONE
099167 ACLU C SLUDGE CONST $243.93 SANI'LCONSTRUCTION
099167 ADVAMCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. f35... RO CON6TRIGAIp 7-30-I
P.i1B- 39 ASPHANiCbb FAA76
099170 ALL ANCRICAN ASPHALT f26.76 ASPHALT h;
099I70 LEASING ASSOC]AYES/ALLSTATE it•532.98 "FICL8 IiASE3 F
6r8
099172 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH $60.08 SECURITY DUPLICATION
099173 AM ERIWM SOUND t VIDEO S/4.99 GODPA DUPLICATION
GXCAVA ION6B F
099176 THE ANCHOR
SEWER KING CO.TION $2.651.35 EXCAVATION L
099176 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. it•651.35 MECHANICAL PASTS w-
d. VALVE
LUL£811FB —
099178 APCO VALVE t PRIMER CORD $
07.06 VALVE PASTS
699179 ARALUN SYSTEMS $1.307.86 UNIFORM mHNd2SG
— y3.2.1133.6j- -- INSTRUMENT
NT S666 '
1�fT1 099181 ARENS A INSTRUMENTS
INC. f2$920.90 IIERUPART SUPPLIES m
�= 099--- ARIZONA INSTRUMENTS CORP. f921 A0 l2TER PARTS
9.00 SOILPREO-9UPP6FE"r
b0 099105 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING f1.113.60 SOIL NESTING
099185 3M50 31.SOB.00 NESTING REGISTRATION 1.
.-iMIR. :i6 --IM9TRUlB!N�Rid'k ..
099187 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE f138.990.91 GRIT REMOVAL M.O. 7-13-88
Ili 099188 BANK OF AMERICA N7iSA $5.00 BANK CARDS C
ASSOC. 84,29C.Co - BSYTOS-3,34,32,3? —
C9.190 B. BATSMAN $575.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
799191 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 3507.66 LLB SUPPLIES "-
'IREPUND-USER MIPFRRPA
099193 BECK-3 TREE SERVICE $10.196.00 LANDSCAPING r
09919. JANES BENIIE S362.31 MEETING EXPENSE - TRAINING
. 5- OFF.C. SBPPCEEN
099196 SOILA RADIATOR SERVICE 3333.90 RADIATOR NEPAIR
099197 BON-AMIUES $96.50 TSIICK REPAIRS P
e 0199 STEVE BUBALD CONSTRUCTION CO. S70.192.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-1 99
099200 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. S95.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
BUSH AMU • AN6, �j VO�B---- RVErIN�
099202 GARY S. STREED $l•6A2.92 PETTY CASH pSUfBUBSp®IT M
099203 C t R RECONDITIDNING CO. f630.00 MECHANICAL PARTS Y
— I1RN0 -
099205 CS COMPANY S5#460,77 RESTOCKING CBARCC k
e� 099206 CAL-CMEN SALES $95.3232 GASKET
sMH6aE'—__
2992 DB CALTROL . INC. f38.96 REGULATOR PUTS 6
�m 099209 CALIFORNIA PANEL 6 VENEER $55.46 BUILDING HSTERIALS
h
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/20/99 PAGE 2 -
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 04/26/87 POSTING DATE D4/26/69
AMOUNT _nrtCRTPTlftN
S �c
099210 CAp pLLO-B OTLE.4 JOINT VENTURE 351. 61 ENGINEERING
R9IC88 us B)-181 152
099212 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM SIS.OB7.52 TELEPHONE EQ9IMIST/SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
099213 CHEM SERVICE $1.129.21 LAB SUPPLIES
°gSFS65.36_
099215 I.V. CNESTERTON CO. S1.070.24 PACRLNG MATERIALS i'.
C99216 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. S13.072.19 GASOLINE/OIL 6 GREASE
099218 KELLY CHRISTENSEN 3462.86 MRRTING CRPEEBE - SRAINIHC
099219 COLDYELL BANKER $22.92 REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT
e RBBA3Ri
099221 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF f1.799.90 MECHANINI CAL PARTS I�I.`.
099222 COMPUTSERVE 111.95 COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES e
°.03 AUTOMOTTVA RAATS
899224 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $3,193.35 ELECTRIC MIS "
099225 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $4,411.33 BLUEPRINTING
"SII.2P---- Pu1¢'-YARis
X 099227 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $167.01 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
2 09922E COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $408.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
• - RBPIFAL EQUZPM641i
099230 LARRY CURTI TRUCK S EQUIPMENT $26,220.00 ELMS REMOVAL M.0.4-13-88
7 q 099231 HORNET FOUNDATION. CSUS S116.60 TECHNICAL MANUALS �
a— �T6- mp6BY1BD7F;N6URANGF AS EIIBNI6flRMF
b10 099233 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S60.62 DIESEL USE TAR
N 999234 STATE BOARD OF EQUALISATION 9450.45 BAZARDOUS WASTE TAX 17
ALLLolADVBRTI6EP16
099236 DANNY DEMTER 3311.23 TRAVEL MOSES - TRAINING
099237 DEW-PAR SALES f SERVICE 31.676.27 TRUCE PARTS
0 OHT{6 PO,V"9R6 ...985.86 M..,A 10 BB it
099239 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $63.60 PRINTING �<
099240 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $690.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT i<
wiL P2— ^<ANT
099242 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $702.14 PAINT SUPPLIES
099243 DWYER INSTRUMENT. INC. f3R4.49 IKSTRmENT PUTS
99244 66 FITTINGS -
099245 ENS RESOURCES. INC. $734.80 CONSULTING SERVICES
099246 EASTMAN. INC. $218.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6
FR8IN B6Ryi 8EG
099248 ENGINEERING-SCIENCE s15.168.39 BNGINEIMNI SERVICES 12-18-2. J-19
099249 MARSHALL FAIRRES f340.00 DEFERRED CORP DISTRIBUTION
899298 JA 16 FAk GONER Sol SULTI11B-BBR
099251 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3,500.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3-7-4.J-20
094252 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP. $440.75 AIR MINT
099254 FERRELLGAS is39.00 PR00 MEART6
099255 FILTER SUPPLY CO. S1.766.02 FILTERS
..I
FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/20/89 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
E COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/26/87 POSTING DATE 04/26/89
1 li
E5CP1PTI OM
099256 FISCHER A PORTER CO. $6.439.84 CHLORINATION PARTS
099256 FLD-SYSTEMS $31,972.95 PUMP PARn
099259 OELBER PUMPS. INC. $1.283.68 Pw PARTS
099261 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT S1•391.T9 PAINT SUPPLIES I'
099262 DONALD L. FOR S ASSOCIATES S1r825.06 SAFETY CONSULTING
099264 CITY OF FULLERTON 53587.89.93 WATER USEAGE
099265 P. GARLAND 513.5 DEFERRED COMP PAY-OP7 '
---�CELBPtl
099267 GERARDS PHOTO LAB $61.50 PHOTO LAR SERVICES
099266 GIEPLICH-NITCHELL• INC. 94.544.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS
ENGINSERVICES HER 08-72
091270 M.R. HOLLYWOOD REFIG. DISYB. $573.35 LAB EQUIPMENT
099271 HACM COMPANY S38.10 LAB SUPPLIES
83T954990_ —....___—_.--uEPERMJUU ID'-MTTRIBUTION
x099273 MARRINGTO; DU INSTPIAL PLASTICS S529.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS
099274 MATCH R KIRK. INC. 64.250.09 MECHANICN PARTS
pD 099277 MARTIN MO C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. sir$50.99 DEFERESSORRED
PUTS
099277 MARTIN ROLL SS 0.99 DEPERPED ROMP PAY-OFF '•'
..TOC--
099279 ROUSE OF•BATT[PIES $2,613.05 BAPPERIES t:
�j 09928E R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. 9999.57 PAINT SUPPLIES
999262 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 5198.94 SEWER REPAIRS i
999283 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $15.90 RUBBER STAMPS l'
099205 IMO OELAVAL INC. $30.89 MECHANICAL PARTS
099286 I.S.I. WEST $1,193.24 ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES I�
099288 INGRAM PAPER $253.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES
099289 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 632.19 WATER USEAGE
9-
099291 JO0.N•S FABR S i ALTERATIONS f2]0.00 UNIFORM ALTERATIONS
099292 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $217.04 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
3:5'r -271F
099294 KAMAN BEARINGS S SUPPLY $472.17 FITTINGS '•
099295 KAMER COMPANY $2r233.C2 MECHANICAL PARTS i`'
r �5-
099297 RUSSELL NEG6 519.3E DEFERRED COMP PAY-0F'P
099298 KIMMERLE EN S- INC. f70.A0 TOOL
.11.11 . .02 _.-..- ' IICIICSGPPCiE3
09930E DONALD E. NINNEY 3835.0E DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTIONP
P' 099503 KIPST PUMP S MACHINE WORKS f839.7^ _ _ PUMP PARTS
a r
Hal
Y�I .
FUND NO 9199 - JT 0187 WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0120/69 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 04/26/87 POSTING DATE 04/26/89 I .
� +nx
099382 MARTIN KORDICK. SR $2.782.60 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-29.5-30 -
099304 L.B.W.S.. INC. S309.6T WELDING SUPPLIES
099305 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $38.88 LAW SUPPLIES ju
MEETING EXPENSE - TRATNTNC
099307 LEE S RO CONSULTING ENGR. f507.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
09930E HOWARD LENORE $253.56 MUING EXPENSE - TRAINING
sw+_nn
099310 in ITOpOUE CORP. $3.202.93 GATE REPAIRS
P99311 LOD1 DOOR f35.05 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT r
r ^RO
09931AINTENSNCE PRODUCTS. INC. . BEARINGS F
099314 HARDEN SU SCO $286 5206.20H6 20 REGIME
EETIN REPAIRS
-71 -MEBTINC EXPENSE - T6AININC
099317 MARVAC ELECTRONICS `$69.86 18STRU[4N1' SUPPLIES
09931T RASTER TOOLS SERVICES fe9.e6 TOOL
�X 099329 MCFARLA ND PARTITIONS TI ONS f1.600.01 PARTITIONS
• = 099129 NONE NNA EN6P. E IDUIP. f10 N59.30 PUMP PARTS
f22 TS
G7 099322 MEDLIN CONPOLS CO. fT86.96 GAUGE
099323 MICROAGE COMPUTER 53.671.89 COMPUTER
' -490.40--- — MANHOLE FRAM E _
t°to 099325 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. --'T$312.24 MECHANICAL PARTS
099326 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES SID7.9/ CELLULAR SERVICES
999328 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $5.440.16 VACUUM SERVICES
099329 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $130.28 PIPE FITTINGS ..
099331 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 4S4.00 WATER USEApgFL1SS
099332 NORTHWEST MOTOR WELDING. INC. $11,108.00 MECHANICAL PARTST" go v
099334 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $96.02 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
099335 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $296.60 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
99337 —$250.6I ^-^^•M STRIPING
099338 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE 5250.06 ROAD STRIPING
09933E ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING ING CO. S376.56 FITTINGS
3
--WLOYEEAp,cwwHEALTH
099341 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $63.92 PEMORS HEALTH
ORKE PLAN INSURANCE
099391 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT f6.829.8s REMORSE WORKERS COMP INSUBAXCB POIm
99342 PAOIFI6 PARTS S898.iS —ItiGTRPARTIT-PAR28
099343 PACO PUMPS SA S186.81 PUMP PARTS
J 099349 PACIFIC 866ETT EQUIPMENT CO. 2691.15 SAFETY SUPPLIES
PACIFIC �--E099346HPARKER PRODUCTIONS. INC. 9289.8E VIDEO RENTALS
PARTS ENGINEERING ON COMPANY 9988.62 COMPRESSOR PARTS
-� FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/20189 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 04/26/87 POSTING DATE 04/26/89
HANSA 6T NO- VENDOR DESCRIPTION
�e
09939E PARTS UNLIMITED 31.982.04 AUTUMOTIVE PARTS I'
9 IPIIITMI ... 611PPLE66
099350 PEL BOOKBINDING CORP. $26.76 PAPER In
099351 ROY PENDERGRAFT 3440.00 DEPERR® COMP DISTRIBUTION
099353 PIMA 600 SYSTEMS. INC. 699.330.55 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-II-89
099354 PITNEY BONES $159.21 POSTAGE METER SERIAL p+
099356 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. 51.834.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
099357 POWER SPECIALISTS. INC. 6612.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS
- $256.62-- TPPRBRPi1N.. !.
099359 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. 64.250.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.5-11-88 u
099360 PULSAFEEOER 5980.6C PUMP PARTS P
.56— FRANK REIB
m099362 RECYC. INC. $42,180.08 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
099363 RED WINO SHOES $248.35 SAFETY SHOES m 9 14t" - 49"olr--. ._ -NBYICE9 6 ADS
..x 099365 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $102.26 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
..S 099366 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM $3.000.00 POSTAGE
—y1yy60.86 REFRIGERATOR
099368 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 63•092.93 FITTINGS
•�� 099369 RICOH CORPORATION $194.78 COPIER LEASES
— _ OiFii'E GO INS
`IA 099371 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL S671.90 INSUDKER PARTS I�
M 099372 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC S329.35 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 1
tlARDNAR6
099371 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTOL $269.634.51 OCEANOGEAPRIC RESEARCH M.0.8-10-88
099575 SEA COAST DESIGNS $506.51 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
.SOT— '--YI9Clr.... TOOLS p.
099377 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 6903.34 OFFICE FURNITURE
099378 SIGNAL FLASH CO. 9319.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES
EtCpL-ERffiWDRIPER TESTEHl
099380 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS 9954.00 SOIL TESTING
P99381 SOLMAR CORP. $19.951.50 "EIICALB
O.DD-
099383 SOUTN COAST DODGE $9.09 TRUCK PARTS
099384 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $361.061.09 POWER
099386 SDUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $722.92 DIESEL FUEL
099387 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $1.523.30 MASER/COOLER RENTALS
�893:78'-..._— TRLDTND'SOP
099389 SPEEDE SPEEDOMETER `75.42 DRIVER TESTING
099390 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. 6818.65 TOOLS
• 265.0" '-�H01V6'1017RTZC-SeRV10ES-- �.:
099392 SUMMIT STEEL 92.951.19 METAL �•
099393 SUNSET FORD 9231.21 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/20/89 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 04/26/97 POSTING DATE 04/26/69 '
1=
099194 SUPER CHEM CORP f50.88 PAINT SUPPLIES
'1320
099396 TIE SUPPLIERS 12,638.7E UAROAAR¢
- 099397 T S C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS, INC $1,174.27 ELECTRIC PARSE
xgygL. mnnonvsev svvmrv.
099399 THOMPSON BLUEPRINT f572.40 PRINTING
D99400 TIDY DIDY SERVICE $671.10 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT �n
yyR
099402 TRAVEL TRAVEL 11.481.01 TRAVEL SERVICES
099403 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY. INC. f1,632.29 TRUCK PARTS
099405 CITY OF TUSTIN f229.D9 WATER USEAGE
099.06 UNOCAL $168.07 GASOLINE
-
099408 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE av$273 Be PARCEL SERVICES
099409 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR 1319:75 SERVICE ROUGHEST r
a311.07_ OEI= n rnw L'.2E pp
099412 VAR SCIFNTIETL f2s313.07 OPERATING SUPPLIES
= 099412 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 15,678.9C FITTINGS
099414 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL 557.22 G�2;Nz ;.rPARTSU.r
7 099415 VALVE SERVICES, INC. 5210.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
• bCl -- -4r172 44 _ ..
D 99417 VERTEX SYSTEMS 51,850.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
07 099438 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $241.68 SAFETY SUPPLIES
099420 WARRINGTON $458.99 METER REPAIR
099421 PENNY WATKINS 546.33 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
ES! SoaSfSAMy+1ggQ.d¢—___ LAB SEPUIfRS
999423 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $51.868.22 CAUSTIC SODA H.0.8-10-88
C99424 WEST-L ITE SUPPLY CO. $151.50 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
029 ii; Si KNOTS IN
099426 WILSON-S EQUIPMENT RENTALS.INC $23,853.02 CONSTRUCTION SEBVIC68 7-12 _
099427 ROURKE S WOODRUFF $19.920.23 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.10-14-87
.v 5— VALVE
099429 ARTHUR YOUNG $13.956.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - USER PEES
099430 RICHARD YOUNG PR00. $1.373.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES n�
ps
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID A4/26/87 $1.942.378.82
s<.
I
e'
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/20/89 PAGE 7
(AUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REPORT NUNBER AP43
AMMINT
02 OPER FUND E 5.306.53
03 OPEN.FUND 49.319.79
03 ACO FUND 171.00 - k
al FIR mun
an¢ nn
05 OPER FUND 4,885.42 1'
05 F/R FUND 1,626.80 '
_ �..
07 OPER FUND 12.172.56
07 ACO FUND 5.521.64
011 OPEN FUND 7,721.37 r
011 ACO FUND 198.94 ¢
248.19 ---_
114 ACO
FUND 700.00
05&6 OPEN FUND 4.949.21
i X 06&7 OPER FUND 32.74
s 07&14 OPER FUND 3.470.41
W CORP 255,754.16
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 7.937.36 i.
KING CAPITA& FlINO --246.12&43
W13
1 & 1,942,078.81
h
k-
it
s
r:
• .. _ _. .ice
Y
6
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 11 21 32 51 61 71 112 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
ON
MAY 17, 1989
p,T11TATlp,1,
yaaovout= pro QlST:
OGE 1co
GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY CENTER
ROOM A
11300 STANFORD AVENUE
GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
An adjourned regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on May 17, 1989, at
7:30 p.m., at the Garden Grove Community Center, Roam A, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove.
Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary
reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman —Dan
Crank
-7—Dan Griset, Chairman pro in Dan Young
= _
Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula Kennedy
=Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: A.B. "Buck' Catlin, Chairman _L__Chris Norby
x William D. Mahoney, Chairman pro tem Beth Graham
Roland E. Bigonger -7--Henry W. Wades
-7—Dan Griset Dan Young
Ron Isles x Carrey Nelson
x James Neal _George Scott
x Arthur G. Newton _Carol Downey
=Bob Perry _Norman Culver
x Iry Pickier _Fred Hunter
7—Wayne Silzel _James T. Fasbender
=Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
=Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chai man Orbrey Duke
xcarrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
=Edward L. Allen _Paul Yerellen
-7—Wes Bannister John Erskine
A.B. "Buck" Catlin =Chris Norby
=Norman Culver _Bob Perry
=Don R. Griffin Donna L. Chessen
=Dan Griset _Dan Young
x John Karel _
=William D. Mahoney _Beth Graham
=James Neal George Scott
=Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter
-7—J.R. --Bob- Siefen —_Dewey Wiles
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
—7—Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom
=Edna Wilson —Joe Hunt
DISTRICT NO. 5: x John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman Evelyn Hart
Donald A. Strauss, Chairman pro tem -7--Evelyn Hart
=Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman _Eric Johnson
=Ruthelyn PI unmer, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart
7—Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman _Fred Barrera
x Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tem _Ursula Kennedy
7-Dan Griset Dan Young
7--Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
=Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran
Donald A. Strauss xJohn C. Cox, Jr.
x James Wahner _Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tom Mays, Chairman _Jim Silva
-7—Grace Winchell, Chairman pro tem Wes Bannister
_L__Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Medea, Chairman Roland E. Bigonger
a Iry Pickier, Chairman pro tem —Fred Hunter
7-Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
=Dan E. Smith Fred Barrera
\� x Wayne Wedin _Ron Isles
DISTRICT NO, 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller
x Ursula Kennedy, Chairman pro tem —Richard B. Edgar
=Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
_2__Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran
x Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera
-2
05/17/89
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, /
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P.\..
Anderson, William N. Clarke, Thomas M.
Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson,
Bob Oaten and Rich von Langen
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Jamel Demir, Kris Lindstrom, Curtis
Spencer, Gary Robbins, Dewey Wiles,
Andrea Berens, Jim Bevington, Renee
Bevington, Rich ten Bosch, Chuck Bragg,
Steve Brown, C. Burns, Roseann
Cacciola, Allyn Cooksey, Larry
Coonradt, Jeff Cross, Ed Evans, Scott
0. Flodin, Glen Frank, Kelly Hamilton,
Mike Heineke, John S. Hingtgen, Gary
Hoffman, Trude Hurd, Shannon Jakosky,
Margaret Johnson, Sonja Klick, Bill
Knopf, Beth Leeds, James Lenoci ,
Bernard Lipman, John Locke, Chris
Ludlow, Mark S. Ludlow, Mike Luke,
Dr. Yash Manchanda, Marcia Manker, Will
Manker, Mitch Martinez, Monica Maur,
Richard G. Maus, Patrick McNelly,
Barry McPhee, Mark Melgian, Douglas
Montague, Jerrell Lofton Moore, Jr.,
Moira Nonnweiler, Matt Nussbaum, J.A.
Oliger, Jeff Page, Michael Pearson, Sam
W. Peterson, Noelle Plack, Thomas
Pratte, Lee Risner, Mary E. Rossi , Amy
Rudell , Bill Samuel ,
R.J. Schwichtenberg, Bob Stokes, Jerry
Thibeault, Patrick Wall , Roger Warren,
Rick Wilson, Jean Winterfect
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 1 This 17th day of May, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. ,
Adjournment of meeting due to lack being the time and place for the
of quorum adjourned regular meeting of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 1, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 1, the
meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary to 5:30 p.m. ,
Thursday, June 1, 1989 to consider modifications to the District's
supplemental user fee program.
DISTRICT 13 This 17th day of May, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. ,
Ad-ournment of meeting due to lack being the time and place for the
o quorum adjourned regular meeting of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 13, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 13, the
meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary.
-3-
4
5/17/89
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that for
Public Hearn on Draf Pro ram EIR the past two years a team of
on Collec on, reatment and consulting experts and staff have been
Disposal Facilities Master Plan engaged in a comprehensive evaluation
of the engineering, environmental ,
public health, social and economic aspects of the County Sanitation
Districts' plan of action for their wastewater management program for the
next 30 years.
He advised that one of the major elements of the "Action Plan" has been the
preparation of an Environmental Impact Report that will be used as the basis
for application to the EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for
renewal of the Districts' ocean discharge permit for the next five-year
period.
Mr. Smith stated that the purpose of the hearing was to receive public
commentary on the Draft Program Environmental but that the official comment
period remains open through May 30th. He added that it is not intended
that there will be any response to the public comments at the hearing that
evening. Rather, following the hearing, the Boards will direct the
consultants to address the oral and written comments received in the Final
Program Environmental Impact Report which will be considered by the Boards
at a later date.
Open Public Hearing
The Joint Chairman declared the hearing open at 7:42 p.m.
Smnnar of Draft Pro ram EIR b
environmental consu ant
The Chair recognized Mr. Curtis Spencer of Jones and Stokes Associates,
Inc., the independent environmental consultant that prepared the Draft
EIR. Mr. Spencer briefly explained the Districts' function and
presented a five-minute video on its operations. He reported that the
Sanitation Districts serve 450 square miles of Metropolitan Orange
County from the Newport Beach-Irvine area north and west to county
lines. The Districts today serve a population of 1.8 million. Service
Is provided by nine Sanitation Districts serving 23 cities and
unincorporated County territory within this highly urbanized area. The
Sanitation Districts treat an average of 260 millon gallons per day of
wastewater. The wastewater reaches the two treatment plants through
more than 800 miles of Sanitation Districts' sewers, fed by local sewers
in upstream communities.
Mr. Spencer further reported that the Districts control hazardous
materials entering sewers through an aggressive industrial toxics
source control program. Mr. Spencer stressed that this was an important
means of reducing toxics in wastewater and sludge.
All of the Districts' flows receive primary or advanced primary
treatment and about half receive secondary treatment. Seventy-five
percent of suspended solids reaching the plant are separated from the
waste stream before discharge and come off as a wet sludge. Chemicals
are also added to facilitate treatment and control odors.
-4-
5/17/89
Mr. Curtis briefly described and showed the various treatment processes
used by the Districts. The residual solids called sludge are trucked to
disposal and reuse locations. About half of the sludge is disposed of �•r�
at landfills where it is mixed with municipal refuse. The balance of
the sludge is reused in agricultural applications to enhance soil
fertility. Composting and use as a soil amendment is also practiced.
The video also showed the Districts' ocean outfall where treated
effluent is discharged from the plants to the ocean through a booster
pumping station pipeline and diffuser complex. The diffuser begins
discharging four miles offshore and extends another 6,000 feet,
releasing effluent at depths from 170 to 195 feet. The underwater views
of the pipe structure showed the marine life that live on and around it.
He also advised that not all of the Districts' wastewater goes to the
ocean, up. to 15 million gallons per day currently receive tertiary
teatment and is reused for groundwater recharge and landscape
irrigation.
The consultant stated that the Sanitation Districts undertook
preparation of an "Action Plan" study to evaluate how to best
accommodate future service demands and treatment requirements. The
actions proposed to meet those future needs are evaluated in the
Environmental Impact Report, which he noted was the subject of the
meeting that evening.
Mr. Spencer then began his overview of the Draft Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilites Master
Plan. A slide presentation accompanied his report depicting the various
elements covered by the EIR. The Program EIR is just one element of the
Districts' 30-year "Action Plan" for wastewater management. This
"Action Plan" study began in 1987 with issuance of the Districts' -
proposed "Action Plan for Balanced Environmental Management: Preserving
Orange County' s Coastal Ocean Waters" and incoporates a complete review
of the Sanitation Districts' activities including the following:
" Scientific review of the Districts' comprehensive,
five-year, $8 million, ocean monitoring program
" A 30-Year Facilities Master Plan by Carollo-Boyle,
a Joint Venture
" An Environmental Impact Report by Jones 8 Stokes
Associates and Willdan Associates
" A Financial Plan by Bartle-Wells
" A Public Participation Program by Urban Alternatives
The consultant noted that all of these studies, programs and documents
will culminate in the Districts' application to the Environmental
Protection Agency and Regional Water Quality Control Board for a new
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit in
August 1989, for the next five-year period.
-5-
5/17/89
Mr. Spencer itemized the major facilities identified in the 30-year
Facilities Master Plan which could have environmental impacts including
V� trunk sewers, expansion of treatment plant capacity, a second ocean
outfall and additional satellite water reclamation plants.
He also defined some of the terminology used in the Facilities Plan and
EIR as a measure of treatment effectiveness and effluent quality. One
term commonly used is "Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOO)" which is a
laboratory test which measures the wastewater's potential effect upon
the oxygen levels of a receiving water.
The treatment plants are expected to expand to 399 mgd capacity by 2020
to keep pace with the anticipated flow increases. These flow estimates
are based on the City and County general plans and are consistent with
the Southern California Association of Governments regional growth
projections. The consultant emphasized that treatment would be
provided, as necessary, to protect beneficial uses of the Pacific Ocean
and meet environmental regulations and permit requirements.
Mr. Spencer then reviewed the three alternative treatment levels under
consideration by the Boards of Directors to achieve the above-referenced
objectives, as follows:
SCENARIO NO. 1 - California Ocean Plan
" 30% Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal
" 75% Solids Removal
(One-third of flow would receive secondary treatment)
SCENARIO NO. 2 - Existing Permit Conditions
" 60% Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal
" 75% Solids Removal
(One-half of flow would receive secondary treatment,
same as existing concentration)
SCENARIO NO. 3 - Full Secondary Treatment (by 2005)
" 85% Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal
" 85% Solids Removal
The consultant continued with his summary of the proposed future
treatment facilities and operations that may have an impact on the
environment. With regard to sludge management, the Districts' objective
is to promote multiple, independent reuse alternatives and maintain at
least one reliable disposal alternative. He pointed out three possible
satellite water reclamation plants. Reclaimed water would be used for
groundwater recharge, landscape irrigation and industrial supplies.
The Districts are considering from one to three plants which would
supplement the existing Water Factory 21 and the planned Green Acres
V...� Project, for a total reclamation capacity of 50 mgd.
-6-
5/17/89
Mr. Spencer reiterated that an important part of the "Action Plan" is
continuation of the toxics source control program. Under the Districts' I
current program, heavy metals have decreased from over 2,000 pounds per
day to 500 pounds per day, a 75% reduction over the last 12 years. A
cornerstone of the Districts' °Action Plan" is continuation of the
aggressive source control program.
The cost of the proposed facilities included in the 30-year Facilities
Plan will be about $3 to 3.8 billion in 1989 dollars. Approximately
half of that cost is for operations and maintenance over the 30-year
period. If the effects of inflation are taken into account, total costs
reach from $7 to over $9 billion at 5% inflation. The cost to the users
will increase from 1.5 to 3 times the current charges within the next
10-15 years. This will vary by service area and depending which
Scenario of treatment level is selected by the Boards.
The consultant advised that the Program Environmental Impact Report
covers the entire Master Plan and evaluated the Master Plan facilities
In comparison to existing conditions relative to growth impacts,
construction impacts, resource impacts, operations impacts, public
health and marine environmental issues.
Said EIR also addresses alternatives to meet the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act. The alternatives considered
Include the three treatment scenarios, a no-project alternative,
18 reclamation sites, 36 sludge management alternatives and trunk sewer
alternatives.
Mr. Spencer added that a Supplemental EIR would be necessary prior to
construction of the second outfall , the reclamation plants and
interplant pipeline.
The "Do-Nothing Option" or no-project alternative would result in
significant adverse impacts, such as sewer overflows, inadequate sewage
treatment, environmental and public health impacts, construction
moratoriums and fines against the Districts.
He also addressed the growth-inducing issue in connection with plant
expansion. He concluded that sewerage system expansion is growth
inducing as defined by CEQA. However, he observed that the Sanitation
Districts do not have land use authority, responsibilities nor
mitigation responsibilities. The County of Orange and the cities do
have that authority and responsibility. Flow projections are based on
their land use plans. Growth and population projections used are
consistent with the projections of SLAG and SCAQMD. Mr. Spencer stated
that there is no difference between the treatment scenarios in terms of
growth impacts.
Impacts resulting from construction of the proposed facilities were also
reviewed by the consultant.
He pointed out that whenever waste is generated, it has to go somewhere.
There are only three media to assimilate wastes--air, land and water.
The EIR evaluated all of these. It found that all air quality
standards would be met under all three scenarios.
-7-
5/17/89
There would be a significant impact on the land from the additional
sludge resulting from higher treatment levels.
He noted that impacts on the water were especially important. Public
health is of primary concern. Environmental issues evaluated relative
to discharge to the Pacific Ocean included toxics, bacteria/viruses,
water quality, marine life, beneficial uses of marine environment, and
cumulative impacts of the Sanitation Districts' discharge considered in
context with other ocean dischargers. With respect to viruses and
bacteria, he pointed out that the EIR concludes for all three scenarios
the location and depth of the outfall and favorable current conditions
effectively preclude adverse impacts on public health.
Mr. Spencer reiterated that industrial toxics control will remain an
important part of the Sanitation Districts' program. He reviewed a
graph showing the beneficial impacts of the ongoing industrial waste
source control program. He added that there are no environmentally
significant differences between the three scenarios with respect to
discharge of toxics because of the source control program.
He reported that some of the remaining suspended solids may settle near
the diffuser including degradable organic matter, heavy metals and trace
toxicants. It was pointed out that the area of impact by deposition, as
estimated by change to feeding patterns of life forms near the
diffusers, was approximated to be 28 acres for Scenario 1, 18 acres for
Scenario 2, and 5 acres for Scenario 3. If the two outfalls were
separated, the acreage impacted would only be about 1/3 of these
figures.
The consultant summarized the findings of the EIR indicating the
document addressed each of the following major public health and
environmental issues:
° Toxics
° Bacteria/viruses
° Water quality
° Marine life
° Beneficial uses
° Cumulative impacts
Based on their study of the above issues, they concluded that they
predict no standards violations will occur for any of the three
scenarios, and expect no significant adverse marine impacts for any of
the three scenarios.
Water quality standards would be met by all three scenarios. Marine
life would be protected and there would be no significant adverse
impacts on beneficial uses. In looking at the cumulative impacts, they
looked at long-term trends and found a decreasing level of impacts for
the last decade. Mr. Spencer reiterated that the EIR indicates no
significant adverse impacts on the marine environment.
There would be significant increase in energy demands for the new
�...i treatment facilities. The Districts do, however, produce energy from
digester gas. Under Scenario No. 1 the least energy would be required
to be purchased and Scenario No. 3 would require the most.
-8-
5/17/89
Other resources affected by the various scenarios would be construction
materials, chemicals used, personnel requirements and costs to /
construct, operate and maintain additional facilities.
Mr. Spencer said that Jones & Stokes concluded that resource allocations
would increase, with Scenario No 3 requiring the greatest amount of
resources. The land impact increases with Scenario 3 also. The marine
environment impact decreases under Scenario 3.
He reiterated that the Draft EIR finds that all three scenarios meet
existing regulations; protect beneficial uses; and protect the
environment from significant impairment. Mr. Spencer stated that the
Districts must weigh the tradeoffs of alternatives, balancing small
changes in the ocean against larger changes on land.
Receive and file written comments
It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the written comments received from the persons listed on
Attachment 1 to these minutes relative to the Draft Program
Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
Oral public comments
Chairman Smith reiterated that the purpose of the meeting was to receive
comments on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report. He requested
that their remarks be kept to approximately five minutes and that in the
interest of time that speakers not repeat previous commentary.
The Chair then recognized the following persons who addressed the Boards:
- Mar aret Johnson, 19742 Shorecliff Lane, Huntington Beach
rs. Johnson stated that she represented t e Huntington Beach
Homeowners Association as well as the American Cetacean Society and
that she was there to request the Boards to go to full secondary
treatment. She questioned the validity of the facts contained in the
EIR relative to biological community. She commented on her view of the
ocean conditions based on her personal observations. She also
commented on the condition of the mouth of the Santa Ana River after a
heavy rain.
She also expressed concern relative to the sludge issue. She
questioned whether different levels of purity were required for the
sludges used for agricultural purposes and those that were discharged
into the ocean. Mrs. Johnson added that in her view the organisms in
the ocean are showing short and long-term changes, and she felt that
something must be impacting them.
- Shannon Jakosky, R W. Bay Avenue, Balboa
Ms. Jakosky stated that she represented the Balboa community as well as
the American Cetacean Society. Her comment was that she believed
Orange County should strive to be the best that money can buy which, in
her opinion, included the best sewage treatment available. She urged
full secondary treatment.
-9-
5/17/89
Shannon Jakosky (Continued)
She also questioned whether data in the EIR was up to date quoting .
surveys done in 1981, 1983 and 1984. Ms. Jakosky claimed that
information in the document relative to the Pinneped (sea lion)
community was inaccurate. She recommended that more current marine
samples be taken and analyzed. She commented that she believed that
toxicity, the public health issue and the marine environment were all
interdependent and she didn't think that standard changes or any
damaging changes were acceptable.
- Moira Nonnweiler, 602 N. Linwood Avenue, Santa Ana
Ms. Nonwe ler stated that she fully agreed with previous speakers. In
addition, she commented that she did not think the greater amount of
sludge produced under Scenario 3 was a significant disadvantage because
one year ago all sludge went to landfills and now 50% is being used for
agricultural purposes. She believed if that change could come about in
one year, more uses could be found in the future. She requested that
her recommendation for full secondary treatment be made a matter of
record.
- R. J. Schwichtenberg, 4141 Fireside Circle Irvine
r. chwichtenberg expressed concern for future generations with regard
to a clean environment. He felt it is a matter of cost and that this
area could afford to implement the best treatment method. He stated
that his recommendation was to do better than Scenario 3.
- Ed Evans, 4793 Grace Avenue Cypress
r. Evans stated he represented Coyote Creek Greens. He stated that he
didn't feel the EIR addressed a broad enough environmental range. It
does not discuss the full ethological consequences. It should be based
on bioregionalism. He indicated that human wastes should be controlled
at home, source reduction, and should be recycled and used for
agricultural purposes.
Beth Leeds, 1645 Pm0yd Drive, Laguna Beach
Ms. Leeds stated that she�ident of the Orange County "Save Our
Shores". She added that they believed that the projected growth of
Orange County from 1.9 million to 2.8 million within the next 30 years
will add to the degradation of the ocean, as well as the quality of
life in Orange County. Of paramount concern to her is the
capacity/growth issues and potential related health concerns. She
urged the public to find ways to clean up the environment and stop
future pollution. She opposed the 301(h) waiver and questioned whether
the no-project scenario wasn't viable if the current system was
upgraded. Ms. Leeds reiterated that she was against any
growth-inducing projects.
- Bernard Lioman, 2208 Via Caliente Fullerton
Mr. Lipman indicated that he was a concerned citizen and was also
representing the Orange County Group of the Sierra Club. The Sierra
Club has gone on record as opposing the 301(h) waiver from the
Environmental Protection Agency. He stated that the EIR does not
address the cumulative demands on the ocean from storm drains, nor the
effects of toxic dumping of dredge materials. He did not feel that the
Districts should discharge any wastewater into the ocean unless it
received secondary treatment.
-10-
5/17/89
-Bernard Lipman (Continued)
He also commented on the differences in heavy metal concentrations
between Scenarios 2 and 3, and expressed his view that these materials
could cause a tremendous deleterious effect on the environment. With
regard to differences in cast of the scenarios, Mr. Lipman stated that
he felt the additional sludge handling costs were minimal compared to
the total cost of the initial construction of facilities.
He concluded that the Sierra Club feels that full secondary treatment
of sewage is necessary.
- Scott Flodin 200 E. 16th Street Costa Mesa
Mr. odin state2 that he represented the students of Orange Coast
College, more particularly the Marine Mammal Research Group on campus.
He agreed with previous comments. He also stated he believed that the
marine mammals off the coast are not being monitored adequately. He
referred to a 1984 survey listed in the EIR and stated that he felt
more recent data should be collected. He stated that if there is not a
fourth scenario, he would have to support Scenario 3.
- John Hingtgen, 916 W. North, Anaheim
Mr. Hingtgen commented that he felt the graphs in the EIR were
misleading. In his opinion they appeared to minimize the differences
between the three scenarios. He pointed out several examples which he
felt distorted the information because of the scales used. He added
that he believed the EIR understates the benefits of going to full
secondary treatment while exaggerating the negative effects. Mr.
Hingtgen suggested a new EIR be prepared.
- Jim Bevington, 13761 Marquette Street, Westminster
Mr. Bevtngtan indicated that he was a member of the Surf Rider
Organization of Orange County. He asked that it be recorded that he is
against the 301(h) waiver. We should utilize the best technology at
hand and use the best available treatment processes, he said. He
believed the added cost would be worthwhile. He added that facilities
would have to be increased to meet the added demand by the year 2000 or
2020, and felt that the Districts should upgrade the facilities at the
same time. He didn't think the people of Orange County would object to
the additional cost.
- Jerrell Lofton Moore, Jr. , 913 Huntington Street, Huntington Beach
Mr. Moore agreed that the additional charge for fu11 secondary
treatment seemed like a small price to pay. He didn't think it was the
best solution but was the better one for now. He believed that
additional study must be done and new solutions found. Mr. Moore
added that secondary treatment is necessary in his view no matter what
the costs are.
- Thomas Pratte (na adthdress given)
r. Pratte stated at he was representing the Surf Rider Foundation.
He indicated that they felt the current 50% secondary treatment was
inadequate. He noted that the EIR states that there is a 10-fold
difference between Scenario 2 and full secondary treatment with regard
to bacteria and viruses. He disagreed with those figures and observed
that he believed there are a lot of unknowns with regard to the
viruses.
-11-
• 5/17/89
Thomas Pratte (Continued)
He also questioned why it would take until 2005 to complete the full
secondary treatment facilities and whether it would be possible to
obtain that treatment before the year 2000. Mr. Pratte encouraged the
Sanitation Districts to take a very conservative approach towards
handling their wastewater. He stated that there are less impacts on
the marine environment with full secondary treatment, as well as less
bioaccumulation and, in his opinion, less risk to swimmers and surfers.
Close Public Hearing
The Joint Chairman then announced that there being no further oral
comments, he would declare the hearing closed at 9:07 p.m.
Mr. Smith reminded the attendees..that there would be no response to the
community at this meeting. Rather, after the close of the official
comment period on May 30th, the consultants would address all the oral
and written comments in a Final EIR to be considered by the Boards at a
later date.
Directing consultants to address Moved, seconded and duly carried:
written and oral comments received
on the Draft EIR and prepare Final That the consultants be, and are
Program EIR after close of the hereby, directed to address oral
comment period on May 30, 1989 and written comments received on
the Draft Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan and to prepare the Final Program EIR after the close of the comment
period on May 30, 1989.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , May 17, 1989.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , May 17, 1989.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adj7ournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, May 31. 1989, to consider modifications to the District's
supplemental user fee program. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 9:10 p.m. , May 17, 1989.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Tdicurnment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 4:00 p.m.,
Wednesday, May 31, 1989, to consider modifications to the District' s
supplemental user fee program. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 9:10 p.m. , May 17, 1989.
-12-
5117/89
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: /
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , May 17, 1989.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 5:30 p.m. ,
Wednesday, June 7, 1989, to consider modifications to the District's
supplemental user fee program. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 9:10 p.m. , May 17, 1989.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , May 17, 1989.
Secretary, Bids of Directors
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 8 14
-13-
i
"ATTACHMENT 1"
Written comments have been received from the following relative to the
Draft Pro ram Environmental Im act Report on the Collection Treatment and
sposa ac lities Mas er an.
Mark Astor City of La Habra
25471 Shoshone 201 E. La Habra Boulevard
E1 Toro, CA 92630 La Habra, CA 90633-0337
William M. Behrens Robert Lindsey
1004 Carbon Canyon Road (Address not given)
Chino Hills, CA 91709
Mechelle Matson
Jim Bevington 21472 Redroso
13761 Marquette Street Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Westminster, CA 92683
William J. Mautz
Charles A. Brewer III and family 1860 Genneyre Street
20960 Charter Oak Terrace Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Marie Mulroy
California State Lands Commission 1739 Candlestick Lane
1807 - 13th Street Newport Beach, CA 92660
Sacramento, CA 95814
Mrs. E. R. Robison
Costa Mesa Sanitary District 4682 Warner
P. 0. Box 1200 Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200
Gordon B. Ruser
R. L. Davis 1221 South Sycamore Street
7 Hawkridge Santa Ana, CA 92707
Irvine, CA 92714
Fred E. Switger
Theresa Ebeling 717 E. Virginia Road
5318 W. Lucky Way Fullerton, CA 92631
Santa Ana, CA 92704
U.S. Marine Corps
Terri Gautier Marine Corps Air Bases
P. 0. Box 15262 Western Area
Newport Beach, CA El Toro (Santa Ana) , CA 92709
Warner George Elsa L. Weber
862 N. Prospect Park 18091 Westlake Avenue
Tustin, CA 92680 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Anita Griffin Martha Wida
2080 Santa Ora, #8 6441 Shawnee Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Westminster, CA 92683
Jean Hermanson Jean Winterfelt
17587 Mead Street 1945 Port Weybridge Place
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Newport Beach, CA
Eber 8 Lorraine Knapp Barbara Wood
7152 Santee Avenue 40 Navarre, #301
..J Westminster, CA 92684-0001 Irvine, CA 92715
David Kobel
16736 Barefoot Circle
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
F ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
MAY 17, 1989 - 7:30 p.m.
Garden Grove Community Center
11300 Stanford Avenue, Room A
Garden Grove, California
Adjournment of meeting by Secretary This 17th day of May, 1989, at
due to lack of quorum 7:30 p.m. , being the time and place
for the Adjourned Regular Meeting of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, and there
not being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District No. 1
was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary to 5:30 p.m. , Thursday, June 1,
1989, to consider modifications to the District's supplemental user fee
program.
Secretary of tlfe Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORN A
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
MAY 17, 1989 - 7:30 p.m.
Garden Grove Community Center
11300 Stanford Avenue, Roam A
Garden Grove, California
• � e e x : x e e f f x ■ : : f
Adjournment of meeting by Secretary This 17th day of May, 1989, at
due to lack of quorum 7:30 p.m. , being the time and place
for the Adjourned Regular Meeting of
County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, and there
not being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District No. 13
was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary.
Secretary of he Board Of D rectors
County Sanitation District No. 13
of Orange County, California
°+• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
May 31. 1989 - 4:00 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the adjourned regular meeting of May 17, 1989, the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, met in
an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:12 p.m. The roll was called and the
Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Ruthelyn
Plummer, Don R. Roth
DIRECTORS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes
and Gary G. Streed
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Steven Wolff, Alan D. Aronson and
Michael Goodman
Actions re appeal of Norlyn
Builders regarding District
connection fees charged far
property located at 1455 Superior
Avenue, Newport Beach
Receive and file a eal submitted Moved, seconded and duly carried:
by Rosenfel indsey 8 Wo ff on
behalf of Norlyn Builders That the notice of appeal submitted
by Rosenfeld, Lindsey 8 Wolff, dated
May 4, 1989, on behalf of Norlyn Builders, regarding connection fees charged
pursuant to Ordinance No. 612 for property located at 1455 Superior Avenue,
Newport Beach, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Report of General Counsel The District' s General Counsel
reported on the appeal of Norlyn
Builders which included their letter dated May 4, 1989, and attachments
consisting of several letters between Norlyn, the City of Newport Beach and
the Sanitation District. He reported that Norlyn Builders was assessed a
$219,000 connection fee for the 146-unit senior citizens residence inn, based
on the connection charge of $1,500 per unit, in accordance with District' s
Ordinance No. 612.
Mr. Woodruff stated that Norlyn Builders contend that they should have been
y� assessed as a commercial property, like a hotel , rather than as a residential
building. The District contends that Norlyn was correctly assessed as
residential property similar to that of any other building with individual
living quarters is assessed, for each individual unit.
-1-
5/31189
DISTRICT 6
The General Counsel briefly reviewed the arguments and conclusion contained
In his Memorandum of May 24, 1989, making comparisons between the definition,
and uses of a "hotel" versus a "residence". He stated that there is no meri.
to Norlyn's contention that it is a "hotel " facility rather than a �•J
"residential " facility for the purposes of connection fees. The facility' s
use of the sewage system is at least as intensive as that of an apartment
house which is required to pay a residential connection fee for each unit.
Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Memorandum dated May 24, 1989
That the General Counsel ' s
Memorandum dated May 24, 1989, regarding said appeal , be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed.
Presentation by Norlyn Builders The Chairman recognized Mr. Steven
Wolff, of Rosenfeld, Lindsey 8
Wolff, attorneys representing Norlyn Builders. Mr. Wolff stated that the
facility located at 1455 Superior Avenue, Newport Beach, is licensed and
regulated by the State Department of Social Services. He advised that the
development is in an area zoned for conrnercial buildings. Mr. Wolff
contended that the project has unique requirements that do not generally
apply to typical residential units. Because of construction obligations,
they paid the connection fees under protest in order to proceed with the
project.
Mr. Wolff further commented on conversations with the District and
correspondence included in their appeal submittal between Norlyn, the
District and the City regarding the connection fee assessment.
Mr. Wolff stated that this facility is an interim, assisted-care facility for
the aged, and the owners will be providing many of the same services as a
convalescent home. He also commented on the parking requirements for
commercial versus residential developments, indicating that their one-quarter
space per unit more closely met the commercial requirements rather than the
residential requirements.
Mr. Wolff also contended that the absence of a complete kitchen in each unit
would preclude them from being classified as "dwelling units" as defined by
the District's ordinance. He questioned the criteria used in the General
Counsel 's Memorandum relative to the residents' permanent address which would
be used for their mail , voter registration, etc.
He reiterated that their facility more closely resembles a convalescent
hospital which is classified as a commercial establishment.
Mr. Wolff also noted that if said facility was determined to be a hotel by
the City of Newport Beach, they were prepared to pay whatever hotel tax was
assessed them.
Mr. Goodman, one of the owners of the facility, also addressed the Board. He
reiterated that the State Department of Social Services regulates this type
of facility and they do not consider it as an apartment-type unit. He also
advised that when the project was originally conceived, the land was zoned
for administrative, professional and commercial .
-2-
5/31/89
DISTRICT 6
Response by General Counsel and The District's General Counsel
staff responded to what he indicated were
some rather gross inconsistencies in
the statements and documents of Norlyn Builders.
Norlyn stated that if the hotel bed tax was appropriate, they would be
prepared to pay the annual tax of $236,520. However, they also stated to the
Sanitation District that they had not planned on, nor were prepared to pay,
the one-time District connection charge of $219,000.
He also pointed out that the original set of plans submitted to the City of
Newport Beach contained the term retirement "home° while the set of plans
given to the Sanitation District had been changed to read retirement "hotel ".
Mr. Woodruff refuted Mr. Wolff's comment regarding parking and stated that if
this facility was classified as a hotel , the parking requirement would be
greater than for residences, not less. He added that the high density land
use of the 146-unit complex on 8/10 of an acre places a tremendous load on
the Sanitation District's facilities.
Director Plummer expressed concern that perhaps this type of development did
not fit into either category--commercial or residential , but that a separate
category should be established to address this type of user as there are
several more establishments of this type planned for the future.
It was pointed out that the issue before the Board that evening was whether
this is a residential unit or a commercial building based on use of the
building and the impact on the sewer system. -
Denying appeal of Norlyn Builders It was moved, seconded and duly
carried:
That the appeal of Norlyn Builders, dated May 4, 1989, regarding the
connection fee charges pursuant to District Ordinance No. 612 for property
located at 1455 Superior Avenue, Newport Beach, be, and is hereby, denied.
Director Ruthelyn Plummer requested that her abstention from voting on the
motion be made a matter of record.
Status Re art on District' s sewer The Director of Engineering reviewed the
rehabil
its t on program and Master status of the District' s rehabilitation
Plan of facilities program and the master-planned
facilities included in the new
Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan currently being
considered by the Directors as part of the Joint Districts' 30-year "Action Plan"
program.
The District has embarked on a major rehabilitation and construction program
relative to trunk sewers that will serve approximately two-thirds of the City of
Costa Mesa. District 6 will participate in a portion of the Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, between Fairview Road and Treatment Plant No. 2, along with
Districts 7 and 14. District 6 will also have to build a parallel trunk sewer in
Fairview Road to relieve the existing line.
Districts Nos. 5 and 6 have completed rehabilitation of the Coast Highway Force
�.. Main. He added that District 6 also has a gravity sewer in Coast Highway that
needs to be replaced but because of the District's financial condition, staff
will try to postpone that work for as long as possible.
-3-
5/31/86
DISTRICT 6
Mr. Dawes also advised that the trunk sewer in Newport Boulevard, which serves
the development around Hoag Hospital , needs to be supplemented with a parallel
line.
The sewer system improvements which will be needed over the next SO-year period �•J
total $SO million. Mr. Dawes noted that this was a little higher than previously
anticipated because of projected higher density land uses.
Update on long-range financial The General Manager reported that in
program and consideration of 1983 the Board modified their long-range
amendments to existing sanitary777 financial program and implemented a
sewer service Charges supplemental user fee to make up the
shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and
provide the additional financing necessary for both operations and maintenance
costs as well as major facilities' rehabilitation. User fees are charged to all
properties connected to the sewer. Funds for facilities' expansion are Currently
provided from connection fees on new development paid by the developer.
In 1986 the Board also considered the issuance of Certificates of Participation
(COP' s) to partially finance their share of the joint works construction at the
treatment plants but the District 6 Board decided against this proposal .
The Acting Director of Finance then reviewed the District' s financial projections
for the next ten years. Based upon the Facilities' Master Plan and the Financial
Plan recommendations contained in the 30-year "Action Plan" now under
consideration by the Joint Boards, District No. 6 will exhaust its capital funds
as soon as 1990-91. The "Action Planu recommends that the District's share of
the treatment plant construction and the trunk sewer construction be financed by
a combination of borrowing (i.e., COP' s) and increased connection fees. Debt
retirement and escalating operating and maintenance costs would be paid by
annually increasing the supplemental user fees.
He noted that the user fee is projected to escalate at an accelerated pace to
maintain the District' s financial integrity. However, there are several unknowns
that may have a major impact on the District's funding requirements.
Staff reported that a considerable portion of the District' s major funding
shortfalls are for capital financing. Staff' s projections assume that all
construction projects proceed on schedule. Thus, the estimates can be considered
"worst case" scenarios. However, the Districts continue to experience delays in
major projects because of SCAQMD requirements. Further delays in these projects
would also delay, or at least spread out, the need for capital funds.
It was also pointed out that, conversely, as the Directors were aware, if the
secondary treatment waiver is not renewed in 1990, the Districts' capital needs
will increase substantially. All projections currently being submitted to the
Directors assume the renewal of the Districts' 301(h) waiver permit.
Mr. Streed then reviewed the current fee schedules of the District, as follows:
Single-Family Multi-Family Comnercia/Industrial /
Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other
One-time Connection $1,500 per $1,500 per $300 per 1,000 sq.
Fee dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building �...�
Annual User Fee $34.85 per $20.92 per $24.95 per 1,000 sq.
dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building
-4-
• - 5/31/89
DISTRICT 6
The Acting Director of Finance explained the District's cash flow projections
were based on several assumptions. Scenario 2 of the "Action Plan", which
recommends continuation of the current treatment levels under the 301(h) waiver,
is the staff's preliminary preferred alternative recommendation. It represents
the minimum probable level of construction, operation and maintenance costs. For
the first five years of the planning period, the differences between Scenarios 2
and 3 (full secondary treatment) would not be significant. Additional flow and
sewer connection assumptions are also consistent with the Master Plan.
With regard to connection fees, the Master Plan Financial Plan recommends a
change in the method of determining connection fees. The recommended change,
which Mr. Streed indicated was incorporated in the cash flow projections, is to
include the cost of future facilities on a per-unit basis. The reason for
including these costs is that the Districts currently operate near capacity and
any new flow will require new additional facilities. He noted that once the
Boards determine the appropriate wastewater management program under the "Action
Plan", a change would be reflected when the residential connection fee is
projected to be $2,260 under Scenario 2.
Mr. Streed reported further that over the next 10 years COP-type borrowing
totaling $29 million is projected to be needed to meet ,joint works treatment and
District sewer capital requirements, the first issue probably In 1990. He
indicated that a more detailed analysis would be performed and presented to the
Directors before any debt is issued. The cash flow projections are for several
small issues on the theory of borrowing as little as possible and only when
absolutely necessary. All issues are assumed to be at a fixed rate of 81. for
20 years.
It was pointed out that the Health and Safety Code permits the user fees to repay
debt; and as the only controllable source of revenue for the District, they are
projected for use to repay the necessary new debt.
The Directors then entered into a discussion of the District' s financial
condition and alternative means of funding the needs, particularly the possible
issuance of debt certificates. The General Manager reiterated that the decision
as to whether or not to issue debt was not before the Directors at this time. He
noted that the purpose of this meeting was ,just to consider adjusting the user
fees for next year. Before a decision is required relative to Incurring debt,
staff will provide a more detailed analysis of the District' s needs and the Board
will make a decision at that time. If the Board should decide against borrowing,
the near-term user fees would probably need to be double what they would
otherwise be.
The General Manager then reviewed the draft ordinance included with the agenda
material which increases the supplemental user fees, as follows:
Single-Family Multi-Family Commercia/Industrial/
Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other
Annual User Fee $49.00 per $29.00 per $35.00 per 1,000 sq.
dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building
Staff added that no change in the connection fee schedule was recommended at this
time. After a final decision is made by the Boards regarding the NPDES Permit
`...✓ renewal , they would be presenting their recommendations to the Board relative to
increasing the connection fees.
-5-
5/31/89
DISTRICT 6
Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. 6 33
First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
...
Ordinance No. 613
That proposed Ordinance No. 613, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 612, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 613 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 613, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance
No. 612, be introduced and passed to second reading on June 14, 1989, at
7:30 p.m. , at the Districts' administrative office.
Makin flndin that adoption of Following a verbal report by the
Ordinance No. 13 1s categorically General Counsel it was moved,
exempt per CEQA Guidelines seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 613
is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines Section 15273, in that the Ordinance establishes fees for
operation and maintenance expenses of the District.
Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6
be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:34 p.m. ,
May 31, 1989.
Secretary, boara of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 6 of
Orange County, California
-6-
w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
F ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
May 31, 1989 - 5:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the adjourned regular meeting of May 17, 1989, the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, met in
an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. The roll was called and the
Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT: Jahn C. Cox, Jr. , Chairman, Evelyn Hart,
Don R. Roth
DIRECTORS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes
and Gary G. Streed
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
4 1 f • f • / ! ! !t 1 ! R t \ Y Y 4 * Y k k ! f ! t
Status Re ort on District's sewer The Director of Engineering reviewed the
rehab tation program and Master status of the District's rehabilitation
Plan of facilities program and the master-planned
facilities included in the new
Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan currently being
considered by the Directors as part of the Joint Districts' 30-year "Action Plan"
program. There have been multiple contracts completed over the past eight or nine
years and the Districts 5 and 6 dual force main in Pacific Coast Highway has been
completely rehabilitated. The new Master Plan has identified additional future
deficiencies with regard to the gravity sewer built in 1936 in Pacific Coast
Highway but replacement of the sewer is not planned for several years depending on
the District' s financial resources.
Other upcoming major projects proposed in the Master Plan are improvements to the
Bay Bridge Pump Station and the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. Staff also noted that
it will be necessary to replace the sewer line beneath Big Canyon Golf Course in
approximately 10 years.
With regard to the downcoast area, Mr. Dawes reported that it will be necessary
to build a sewer and a pump station in accordance with the agreement previously
entered into with the Irvine Ranch Water District. They have prepaid the
required connection fees and the agreement provides for payment of 100% of the
cost for all of the facilities south of the existing City of Newport Beach limit.
The cost for the facilities will total approximately $4.5 million but this will
be borne entirely by Irvine Ranch Water District.
Several of the projects will be required in the late 1990' s and Mr. Dawes
reported that sewer system improvements over the next 10-year period would total
over $17 million.
-1-
5/31/89
DISTRICT 5
Update on long-range financial The General Manager reported that
program and consideration of in 1981 District 5 was the first of the
amendments to existing sans ary Districts to Implement a supplemental
sewer service charges user fee program to make up the
shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and
provide needed additional financing for operations and major rehabilitation work
on the sewer system. New development pays a separate connection fee for sewage
system capacity.
He further advised that when the program was originally presented to the public
and adopted by the Board, it was anticipated that it would be necessary to
increase the fees by approximately 77% beginning with the second year to finance
the rehabilitation work on the trunk sewer system. The District has been able to
delay any increase In the supplemental user fees originally adopted in 1981 due
to a significant decline in inflation rates, receipt of favorable bids on various
District and joint works construction and rehabilitation projects, and delays in
various major plant projects, all of which have reduced District expenditures and
cash flow requirements well below originally anticipated levels.
In response to a State Water Resources Control Board ruling, the Directors
ordered a change in the supplemental user fee program from a water-meter-size
basis to a flat fee for single and multi-family residences, and fees for other
facilities based on square footage of improvements. This change was effective
for the 1987-88 fiscal year.
In 1986 the Board considered and rejected the issuance of Certificates of
Participation (COP' s) in concert with other Districts to partially finance the
District' s share of joint treatment works construction.
The Acting Director of Finance then reviewed the District' s financial projections
for the next ten years. Based upon the Facilities' Master Plan and the Financial
Plan recommendations contained in the 30-year "Action Plan" now under
consideration by the Joint Boards, District No. 5 will exhaust its capital funds
as soon as 1990-91. The "Action Plan" recommends that the District's share of
the treatment plant construction and trunk sewer construction be financed by a
combination of borrowing (i.e. , COP' s) and increased connection fees. Debt
retirement and escalating operating and maintenance costs would be paid by
annually increasing the supplemental user fees.
He noted that the user fee is projected to escalate at an accelerated pace to
maintain the District's financial integrity. However, there are several unknowns
that will have a major impact on the District' s cash flow requirements.
Staff reported that a considerable portion of the District's major funding
shortfalls are for capital financing. Staff's projections assume that all
construction projects proceed on schedule. Thus, the estimates can be considered
"worst case" scenarios. However, the Districts continue to experience delays in
major projects because of SCAQMD requirements. Further delays in these projects
would also delay, or at least spread out, the need for capital funds.
It was also pointed out that, conversely, as the Directors were aware, If the
secondary treatment waiver is not renewed In 1990, the Districts' capital needs
will increase substantially. All projections currently being submitted to the
Directors assume the renewal of the Districts' 301(h) waiver permit.
-2-
5/31/89
DISTRICT 5
Mr. Streed then reviewed the current fee schedules of the District, as follows:
Single-Family Multi-Family Commercia/Indust rial/
d./ Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other
One-time Connection $1,500 per $1,500 per $300 per 1,000 sq.
Fee dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building
Annual User Fee $26.40 per $15.85 per $18.90 per 1,000 sq.
dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building
The Acting Director of Finance explained the District's cash flow projections
were based on several assumptions. Scenario 2 of the "Action Plan", which
recommends continuation of the current treatment levels under the 301(h) waiver,
is the staff's preliminary preferred alternative recommendation. It represents
the minimum probable level of construction, operation and maintenance costs. For
the first five years of the planning period, the differences between Scenarios 2
and 3 (full secondary treatment) would not be significant. Additional flow and
sewer connection assumptions are also consistent with the Master Plan.
With regard to connection fees, the Master Plan Financial Plan recommends a
change in the method of determining connection fees. The recommended change,
which Mr. Streed indicated was incorporated in the cash flow projections, is to
include the cost of future facilities on a per-unit basis. The reason for
including these costs is that the Districts currently operate near capacity and
any new flow will require additional facilities. He reported that no change in
the connection fee schedule was recommended at this time. After a final decision
is made by the Boards regarding the NPDES Permit renewal , staff would be
presenting their recommendations to the Board relative to increasing the
connection fees, probably to take effect October 1, 1989, when the residential
connection fee is projected to be $2,260 under Scenario 2.
Mr. Streed reported further that over the next 10 years COP-type borrowing
totaling $42 million is projected to be needed to meet joint works treatment and
District sewer capital requirements. The first issue is projected for 1990. He
indicated that a more detailed analysis would be performed and presented to the
Directors before any debt is issued. The cash flow projections are for several
small issues on the theory of borrowing as little as possible and only when
absolutely necessary. All issues are assumed to be at a fixed rate of 8% for 20
years.
It was pointed out that the Health and Safety Code permits user fees to repay
debt; and as the only controllable source of revenue for the District, they are
projected for use to repay the necessary new debt.
The Board then entered into a discussion of the possible increases in user fees
based on different assumptions, including Scenario 3 requiring full secondary
treatment, and the financing alternatives. Staff indicated that the biggest
increase under a full secondary treatment scenario would be required around the
turn of the century and again when the treatment facilities would first come on
line in the year 2005. At this time, it is estimated that the user fees would
increase by an additional $50-75 per year.
-3-
5/31/89 a,
DISTRICT 5
The General Manager then reviewed the draft ordinance included with the agenda
material which increases the supplemental user fees, as follows:
Single-Family Multi-Family Conmercia/Industrial/
Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other
Annual User Fee $45.00 per $27.00 per $32.00 per 1,000 sq.
dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building
Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. 51
First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance No. 519
That proposed Ordinance No. 519, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 519 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be introduced and passed
to second reading on June 14, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., at the Districts,
administrative office.
Makin findin that adoption of Following a verbal report by the
Ordinance No. 51 is categorically General Counsel , it was moved,
exempt per CEQA Guidelines seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 519
is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines Section 15273, in that the Ordinance establishes fees for
operation and maintenance expenses of the District.
Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5
be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 6:08 p.m. ,
May 31, 1989.
Secretary, Boary of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5 of
Orange County, California
-4-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
June 1, 1989 - 5:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to adjournment by the Secretary of the adjourned regular meeting of May 17,
1989, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:49 p.m. The roll was called and the
Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT: Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset and
Ronald B. Hoesterey
DIRECTORS ABSENT: Roger R. Stanton
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes
and Gary G. Streed
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
k k k # k k k # # # # k # # # # # k k k # # # k # Y
Update on long-range financial The General Manager reported that in
program and consideration of 1984 District 1 modified its long-range
amendments to existing sanitary financial plan. This plan established
sewer service charges one-time sewer connection fees for new
development to finance facilities
expansion, and a supplemental user fee to make up a shortfall in ad valorem tax
revenues and provide the additional financing necessary for both operations and
maintenance as well as major facilities rehabilitation. The financial plan was
adopted after considerable study to avoid projected short and long-range funding
shortfalls in revenues required to finance the District's operating and capital
expenses, which are escalating due to the rising cost of meeting environmental
and public health standards established by state and federal regulatory agencies.
Mr. Sylvester then reviewed the current fee schedules of the District, as
follows:
Single-Family Multi-Family Cortmercia/Industrial /
Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other
One-time Connection $1,500 per $1,500 per $300 per 1,000 sq.
Fee dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building
Annual User Fee $34.32 per $20.60 per $24.57 per 1,000 sq.
dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building
�/ -I-
6/01/89
DISTRICT 1
He further reported that the Districts all have a separate industrial user fee
billed annually by the Districts for users that place a higher demand on the
Districts' sewerage system.
In 1986 the Board also elected to issue $24,700,000 in Certificates of
Participation (COP's) in concert with Districts Nos. 2 and 3 to partially finance
District 1's share of joint treatment works construction and to purchase
additional equity in the joint treatment works to reflect the new flow-based
joint works equity formula.
The Acting Director of Finance then reviewed the District's financial projections
for the next ten years. Based upon the Facilities' Master Plan and the Financial
Plan recommendations contained in the 30-year "Action Plan" now under
consideration by the Joint Boards, District No. 1 will exhaust its capital funds
as soon as 1990-91. The nAction Plan" recommends that the District' s share of
the treatment plant construction and trunk sewer construction be financed by a
combination of borrowing (i.e. , COP's) and increased connection fees. Debt
retirement and escalating operating and maintenance costs would be paid by
annually increasing the supplemental user fees.
He noted that in 1988-89 the District had increased the user fees by 30% to
finance District activities. Staff's recommendation for 1989-90 is for another
30% increase. However, in the next few years the user fees may have to escalate
at an accelerated pace to maintain the District's financial integrity. However,
there are several unknowns that may have a major impact on the District' s cash
flow requirements.
Staff reported that a considerable portion of the District' s major funding
shortfalls are for capital financing. Staff's projections assume that all
construction projects proceed on schedule. Thus, the estimates can be considered
"worst case" scenarios. However, the Districts continue to experience delays in
major projects because of SCApMD requirements. Further delays in these projects
would also delay, or at least spread out, the need for capital funds.
It was also pointed out that, conversely, as the Directors were aware, if the
secondary treatment waiver is not renewed in 1990, the Districts' capital needs
will increase substantially. All projections currently being submitted to the
Directors assume the renewal of the Districts' 301(h) waiver permit.
Mr. Streed explained the District' s cash flow projections were based on several
assumptions. Scenario 2 of the uAction Plan", which recommends continuation of
the current treatment levels under the 301(h) waiver, is the staff's preliminary
preferred alternative recommendation. It represents the minimum probable level
of construction, operation and maintenance costs. For the first five years of
the planning period, the differences between Scenarios 2 and 3 (full secondary
treatment) would not be significant. Additional flow and sewer connection
assumptions are also consistent with the Master Plan.
With regard to connection fees, the Master Plan Financial Plan recommends a
change in the method of determining connection fees. The recommended change,
which Mr. Streed indicated was incorporated in the cash flow projections, is to
Include the cost of future facilities on a per-unit basis. The reason for
including these casts is that the Districts currently operate near capacity and
any new flow will require new facilities. He noted that a determination would E�
made by the Board after a decision is made on the permit renewal application and
any revised connection fees would probably be effective October 1, 1989, when the
residential connection fee is projected to be $2,260 under Scenario 2.
-2-
' 6/01/89
DISTRICT 1
He further reported that Over the next 10 years COP-type borrowing totaling
$80 million is projected to be needed to meet joint works treatment and District
sewer capital requirements. He indicated that a more detailed analysis would be
�..d performed and presented to the Directors before any debt is Issued. The cash
flow projections are for several small issues on the theory of borrowing as
little as possible and only when absolutely necessary. All issues are assumed to
be at a fixed rate of 8% for 20 years.
It was pointed out that the Health and Safety Code permits user fees to repay
debt; and as the only controllable source of revenue for the District, they are
projected for use to repay the necessary new debt. Existing debt continues to be
repaid from capital funds.
The Board then entered into a general discussion of the District's financial
situation and the alternatives for funding the District's needs. Directors
questioned whether any of the other Sanitation Districts were in a position to
loan money to District 1 rather than issue debt certificates. Staff reported
that based on recommendations included In the Financial Plan of the new Master
Plan, all of the Districts will have to go into the debt market. A desire to
minimize borrowing and to build District reserves by other means was also
expressed.
The General Manager then reviewed the draft ordinance included with the agenda
material which increases the supplemental user fees, as follows:
Single-Family Multi-Family Comnercia/Industrial/
Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other
Annual User Fee $45.00 per $27.00 per $32.00 per 1,000 sq.
dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. Of building
Staff reported that no change in the connection fee schedule was recommended at
this time. After a final decision is made by the Boards regarding the NPDES
Permit renewal , staff will present their recommendations to the Board relative to
increasing the connection fees. The Directors commented that they would prefer
to increase the connection fees gradually and build a reserve for their future
facilities' requirements. Mr. Sylvester reiterated that the recommended change
In the policy for computing connection fees would increase the fee from $1,50o to
$2,260. Thereafter, the connection fee would probably increase 5% annually based
on the construction cost index. He added that those projections are based on the
assumption of Scenario 2, continuing with the current level Of treatment. If the
Boards choose to go to Scenario 3, full secondary treatment, the current fee
would increase to $2,500. Staff assured Directors that the connection fees would
be escalated annually to keep pace with inflation.
Actions re proposed Ordinance
NO. 112
Firs t�reading�of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
rd nan0 1 ce No. 112
That proposed Ordinance No. 112, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111, be read by title only;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 112 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
-3-
6/01/89
DISTRICT 1
That Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance
No. 111, be introduced and passed to second reading on June 14, 1989, at
7:30 p.m. , at the Districts' administrative office.
Making finding that adoption of Following a verbal report by the
Ordinance No. 112 1s categorically General Counsel , it was moved,
exempt per CEQA Guidelines seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 112
is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines Section 15273, in that the Ordinance establishes fees for
operation and maintenance expenses of the District.
Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1
be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 6:14 p.m. ,
June 1, 1989.
Secretary, Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California
-4-
. . . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
June 7, 1989 - 5:30 p.m.
�..� 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the adjourned regular meeting of May 17, 1989, the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, met
in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. The roll was called and the
Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT: Tom Mays, Chairman, Grace Winchell
DIRECTORS ABSENT: Roger R. Stanton
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Secretary, William N.
Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes and Gary G. Streed
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Conrad
Hohener
Update on long-range financial The General Manager reported that in
program and consideration of 1987 the Board modified their long-range
amendments to existing sanitary77 financial program and implemented a
sewer service charges supplemental user fee to make up the
shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and
provide the additional financing necessary for bath operations and maintenance
costs as well as major facilities' rehabilitation. User fees are charged to all
properties connected to the sewer. Funds for facilities' expansion are currently
provided from connection fees on new development paid by the developer.
In 1986 the Board also considered the issuance of Certificates of Participation
(COP's) to partially finance their share of the joint works construction at the
treatment plants but the District 11 Board decided against this proposal .
Mr. Sylvester then reviewed the current fee schedules of the District, as
follows:
Single-Family Multi-Family Commercia/Industrial/
Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other
One-time Connection $1,500 per $1,500 per $300 per 1,000 sq.
Fee dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building
Annual User Fee $26.40 per $15.83 per $18.90 per 1,000 sq.
dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building
-I-
6/07/89
DISTRICT 11
He further reported that the Districts all have a separate industrial user fee
billed annually by the Districts for users that place a higher demand on the
Districts' sewerage system.
The Acting Director of Finance then reviewed the District's financial projections/
for the next ten years. Based upon the Facilities' Master Plan and the Financial
Plan recommendations contained in the 30-year "Action Plan" now under
consideration by the Joint Boards, District No. 11 will exhaust its capital funds
as soon as 1990. The "Action Plan" recommends that the District's share of the
treatment plant construction and trunk sewer construction be financed by a
combination of borrowing (i.e. , COP's) and increased connection fees. Debt
retirement and escalating operating and maintenance costs would be paid by
annually increasing the supplemental user fees. He noted that in the next few
years the user fees may have to escalate at an accelerated pace to maintain the
District's financial integrity. However, there are several unknowns that may
have a major impact on the District's cash flow requirements.
Staff reported that a considerable portion of the District's major funding
shortfalls are for capital financing. Staff's projections assume that all
construction projects proceed on schedule. Thus, the estimates can be considered
"worst case" scenarios. However, the Districts continue to experience delays in
major projects because of SCAQMD requirements. Further delays in these projects
would also delay, or at least spread out, the need for capital funds.
It was also pointed out that, conversely, as the Directors were aware, if the
secondary treatment waiver is not renewed in 1990, the Districts' capital needs
will increase substantially. All projections currently being submitted to the
Directors assume the renewal of the Districts' 301(h) waiver permit.
Mr. Streed explained the District's cash flow projections were based on several
assumptions. Scenario 2 of the "Action Plan", which recommends continuation of
the current treatment levels under the 301(h) waiver, is the staff's preliminary
preferred alternative recommendation. It represents the minimum probable level
of construction, operation and maintenance costs. For the first five years of
the planning period, the differences between Scenarios 2 and 3 (full secondary
treatment) would not be significant. Additional flow and sewer connection
assumptions are also consistent with the Master Plan.
With regard to connection fees, the Master Plan Financial Plan recommends a
change in the method of determining connection fees. The recommended change,
which Mr. Streed indicated was incorporated in the cash flow projections, is to
Include the cost of future facilities on a per-unit basis. The reason for
Including these costs 1s that the Districts currently operate near capacity and
any new flow will require new facilities. He noted that a determination would be
made by the Board after a decision is made on the permit renewal application and
any revised connection fees would probably be effective October 1, 1989, when the
residential connection fee is projected to be $2,260 under Scenario 2.
He further reported that over the next 10 years COP-type borrowing totaling
$54 million is projected to be needed to meet joint works treatment and District
sewer capital requirements. He indicated that a more detailed analysis would be
performed and presented to the Directors before any debt is issued. The cash
flow projections are for several small issues on the theory of borrowing as
little as possible and only when absolutely necessary. All issues are assumed t�
be at a fixed rate of 8% for 20 years.
-2-
6/07/89
DISTRICT 11
It was pointed out that the Health and Safety Code permits user fees to repay
debt; and as the only controllable source of revenue for the District, they are
projected for use to repay the necessary new debt.
Staff reported that the projections assume that the Balsa Chica will annex to the
District and that annexation fees in the amount of $3,020,000 will be received in
1989-90. However, if the annexation fees are not received in 1989-90, District
No. 11 will probably have to accelerate its issuance of $30,000,000 in COP's from
1990-91 to 1989-90. Sufficient information is not available to the District at
this time on the projected development of the Bolsa Chica to enable an estimate
of connection fee revenues from this area. Any connection fees received would
partially reduce the projected $54,000,000 estimated CDP's over the next 10-year
period.
The Board then entered Into a lengthy discussion of the District's financial
condition and estimated fee schedules for the future. Considerable time was
devoted to alternatives relative to financing the capital facilities requirements
and a review of connection fees and the proposed development within the
District's existing boundaries, as well as the anticipated annexation of the
Bolsa Chica, and a fee structure that provides that new development pays the
appropriate amount for sewerage system capacity. Staff reiterated that the
current annexation fee and the proposed connection fee formula recommended by the
Master Plan financial consultant assures that new development pays its fair share
of existing and needed future facilities.
The General Manager then reviewed the draft ordinance included with the agenda
material which increases the supplemental user fees, as follows:
Single-Family Multi-Family Commercia/Industrial/
Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other
Annual User Fee $40.00 per $24.00 per $29.00 per 1,000 sq.
dwelling unit dwelling unit ft. of building
Staff reiterated that no change in the connection fee schedule was recommended at
this time. After a final decision is made by the Boards regarding the NPDES
Permit renewal , staff will present their recommendations to the Board relative to
increasing the connection fees. Mr. Sylvester also reiterated that the
recommended change in the policy for computing connection fees would increase the
fee from $1,500 to $2,260. Thereafter, the connection fee would probably
increase 5% annually based on the construction cost index. He added that those
projections are based on the assumption of Scenario 2, continuing with the
current level of treatment. If the Boards choose to go to Scenario 3, full
secondary treatment, the current fee would increase to $2,500.
Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. 1109
First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance—Ro. 1109
That proposed Ordinance No. 1109, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
-3-
6/07/89
DISTRICT 11
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1109 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be introduced and
passed to second reading on June 14, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the Districts'
administrative office.
Makin findin that ado tion of Following a verbal report by the
r nance No. 1109 is sate oricall General Counsel , it was moved,
exempt per CEQA uidelines seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1109
is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines Section 15273, in that the Ordinance establishes fees for
operation and maintenance expenses of the District.
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers for re ar&tion of Phase I
Preliminary Pro ect sport for
blater Avenue Pump Station Sewage
System Im rovements
contract o. 11-1
Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported
that the new sewerage facilities Master
Pla0 report prepared for the Joint Districts as part of the "Action Plan"
effort includes both the joint treatment and disposal facilities, as well as
the sewer conveyance systems for each of the sanitation districts. In
District 11 the consultants have found that Slater Avenue Pump Station and
certain trunk sewer facilities will be deficient for meeting future
short-term and long-term capacity requirements; the most notable deficiency
being the Slater Avenue Pump Station.
The long-term solution had been identified in previous master plan reports as
the extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer from its present terminus at Golden
West Street in Orange Avenue northwesterly through the Bolsa Chica area to
Edwards Street at Slater Avenue. Under this plan a line extending easterly
in Slater Avenue would relieve the Slater Avenue Pump Station, while a line
extended north in Edwards Street would relieve the Springdale Street sewer
collection facilities, all at an estimated cost of $21.9 million.
The new master planning team reviewed this and other alternate ways to
provide the needed sewer improvements. The alternatives included diverting a
portion of the area tributary to the Slater Avenue Pump Station easterly to
the Knott Interceptor, thereby reducing the quantity of flow through the
Slater Avenue Pump Station at an estimated cost of $16.6 million; and
rebuilding the Slater Avenue Pump Station at an estimated cost of $14.2
million. The latter is the most economical method.
The Slater Avenue Pump Station is currently operating at or near capacity.
With continuing development taking place within the drainage area served by 1-
the pump station, a project to correct the projected deficiencies is urgentlg�
needed.
-4-
6/07/89
DISTRICT 11
The pending Master Plan recommends that the Slater Avenue Pump Station be
rebuilt at essentially the same location. It appears that the station could
best be built adjacent to the existing station on lands now owned by General
Telephone (GTE).
Three phases of work for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System
Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, are envisioned:
Phase I includes preparation of a project report detailing the size and
construction requirements of the pump station elevations and the trunk
sewer improvements tributary to the station. The engineering documents
will also provide the necessary data for acquisition of a site from GTE.
Phase II will include preparation of detailed construction plans and
specifications, and an addendum to the professional services agreement
will be negotiated and presented to the Directors for consideration at a
later date.
Phase III will be the actual construction of the facilities.
In February, staff recommended that the Board proceed with the Phase I work
for preliminary engineering work in advance of the "Action Plan" completion
and certification in order to ensure that District 11 can continue to provide
adequate sewer service. The Board authorized solicitation of proposals for
the Phase I work.
Mr. Dawes reviewed the proposals received from John Carollo Engineers, Boyle
Engineering Corporation and Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, and
recommended approval of a professional services agreement with John Carollo
Engineers for preparation of Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater
Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, on an
hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, and fixed profit, for an
amount not to exceed $44,738.00.
Mr. Dawes also noted that it is anticipated that engineering services for
Phase II and Phase III will be negotiated upon completion of Phase I. This
portion of the contract will be negotiated separately and presented to the
Board for approval at that time.
Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried:
dated May 31, 1989
That the Staff Report dated May 31,
1989 re selection of engineering consultant for preparation of Phase I
Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System
Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
Approving Professional Services Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Agreement with John Car-- ollo
Engineers re contract No. 11-17 That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 89-50-11,
approving Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for
preparation of Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump
Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, on an hourly-rate
`...� basis for labor plus overhead, plus fixed profit, for a total amount not to
exceed $44,738.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
-5-
6/07/89 =
DISTRICT 11
Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11�—J
be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 6:44 p.m. ,
June 7, 1989.
Secretary, doard of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 11 of
Orange County, California
-6-
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
-� JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14; 1989 - 7 :30 P .M.
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant
to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and
file said excerpts:
DISTRICTS 2 & 3
(4) (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept
resignation of Mayor Laurann Cook of the City of
Fountain valley from the Boards of Directors of
Districts Nos. 2 and 3, and to receive and file
Resolution No. 8297 seating first and second alternates
to the mayor, as follows:
Districts Active Director Alternate Director
2 5 3 James Neal George Scott
DISTRICTS 3 6 6
(4) (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts
and resolutions from the following re election of mayors,
appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members
of the Boards: (*Mayor)
Agency District(s ) Active Director Alternate Director
Costa Mesa 6 James A. wahner James M. Ferryman
Sanitary
District
Huntington 3 Was Bannister* Peter Green
Beach /��
Seal Beach 3 victor Grgas* Edna Wilson
AGENDA ITEM NO. 39 - RE: BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON APPEAL
CHAIRMAN POLIS :
PRIOR TO OPENING HEARING:
- I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE RICHARD MARSH, A PRINCIPAL
IN THE LOS ANGELES LAW FIRM OF KNAPP, MARSH, JONES AND
DORAN.
- MR . MARSH WILL ACT AS THE COUNSEL TO THE BOARD FOR
THE HEARING TONIGHT.
- BEFORE WE OPEN THE HEARING, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK MR. MARSH
TO REVIEW THE PROCEEDINGS FOR CONDUCTING THE HEARING FOR
THE DIRECTORS .
AFTER OPENING THE HEARING: ( Item 39 ( a ) ( 1 ) ]
- PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE EVIDENCE AND HEARING THE PRESENTATION
BY REPRESENTATIVES OF BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON AND THE DISTRICT
STAFF, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THAT THE DIRECTORS RECEIVE A
BRIEF ORIENTATION OF THE DISTRICT' S TREATMENT PROCESS AND
THE BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON SITE LOCATION.
- MR . BLAKE ANDERSON, COULD YOU PLEASE PROCEED TO DO THAT .
i
.. 2
4
4
5
6
7
BEFORE THE
8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER 3
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
9
10 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL ) Permit No. 3-1-143
11 OF BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON, INC. )
j FINDINGS
12 )
13
14 1 . On February 15, 1989 , the District issued Permit
15 No. 3-1-143 ( "Permit" ) to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ( "Beatrice.. ) .
16 2. This Permit contains limits on the discharge of
17 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) as set forth therein.
18 3 . These BOD limits are in accord with previously developed
19 discharge limits applicable to industrial dischargers of dispropor-
20 tionately large amounts 'of BOD.
21 4. The SOD limits set forth in the Permit are necefsar
i
22 � order to meet NPDES permit requirements and prevent^i^tarference
23i with the treatment processes of Plant No. 2.
24 5. The methodology of restricting the introduction of BOD
25 into Plant No. 2 as evidenced by the Permit is consistent with the
26 guidelines promulgated by EPA.
27 /
28 /
5450.2F1-1 - --
i
A
1 6. The Permit was validly issued under the laws of the State
2 of California and the District' s Regulations For Use of District
\� 3 Sewerage Facilities.
4 7 . The issuance of the Permit is exempt from the require-
5 ments of the California Environmental Quality Act because
6 - a) The issuance of this permit is not a project
7 or
8 b) If the issuance of the permit is determined to be a
9 project, it is categorically exempt under 14 Cal Code
10 of Regulations sections 15307 ; 15308 and 15321 .
11 8 . The classification which distinguishes Beatrice and other
12 high strength BOD dischargers from other users of the District' s
13 sewerage system is reasonable.
14 9• There are feasible methods by which Beatrice can obtain
15 the BOD levels set forth in the Permit.
i
16 10. These methods can be implemented for costs which are
17 reasonable in light of all the circumstances prevailing.
18 NOW, THEREFORE, this Board does hereby deny the appeal of
19 Beatrice/Hunt-wesson, Inc. , does ratify the action taken by the
20 District staff in issuing Permit No. 3-1-143 and does confirm all
21 the provisions thereof.
22
23
24
25
26
27
�. 28
5450. 2F1-2/sa -- 2.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Clean Water Act") mandated the
development by the U.S. EPA of a National Pretreatment Program designed
to prevent the discharge to POTW's of pollutants which interfere with, pma
through or are otherwise incompatible with the treatment facilities.
(Clean Water Act, Section 307 (b) (c) .)
The U.S. EPA has adopted a comprehensive national program regulating
dischargers and establishing pretreatment standards and requirements for
industrial users and mandating local POTW's to implement this program by
adoption of their own pretreatment programs.
(Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 403.)
The Federal Pretreatment Regulations prohibit any user from introducing into
any POTW, any pollutant, including BOD, which passes through or causes
interference with the POTW's treatment processes or operations.
(Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 4035(b)(4).)
Both state and local law authorize the Districts to regulate Beatrice's BOD
discharge into the sewer system.
(California Government Code Section 54739;
Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201, 2O8(B)(4)and 302.1(c).)
The Districts complied with applicable federal, state and local regulations in
developing the BOD discharge limitation policy.
(Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 403.1, et seq.;
California Government Code Section 54739;
Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201 and 208(B) (4).)
Locally established limits imposed upon individual industrial users should be
preventative rather than reactive.
The Districts have followed the express published guidelines of EPA for
pretreatment regulation and implementation, by considering all relevant
treatment plant and environmental information, together with sound
engineering and scientific data in establishing the Districts' BOD discharge
limits.
(EPA Guidance Manual on Development and Implementation of Local
Discharge Limitations Under the Pretreatment Program (Dec. 1987), Section
13.2.)
v District's Ordinance No. 306 authorizes the District's staff to impose
pretreatment and discharge limitations conditions on industrial users.
(Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 302.1 and 302.2.)
302.1 Class I Permit Application
A. . . .
B. . . .
C. Other information may be required to properly evaluate the
permit application. After evaluation and acceptance of the
data furnished, the District may issue a Class I wastewater
discharge permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in
this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the Chief
Engineer to be necessary to protect the District's system.
302.2 Class I Permit Conditions, Limitations and
Stipulations that may be in Permit:
A. Mass emission rates regulating incompatible pollutants;
I Other provisions which may be applicable to insure compliance
with all provisions of this Ordinance;
K. Other terms and conditions determined by the Chief Engineer
to be necessary to protect the District's system.
The Districts' past experience has established that excessive BOD discharges
seriously threaten to both apes through and interfere with the operation of the
Districts' wastewater treatment plants and jeopardize the Districts' 301(h)
waiver in its NPDES permit.
(Declaration of D. Jenkins, pp. 3-5;
Declaration of R. von Langen, p. 13.)
Beatrice has the ability to implement procedures to significantly reduce BOD
discharges even without construction of a pretreatment facility.
(Declaration of K. Christensen, pp. 2-3; Declaration of R. von Langen, pp.
16-17.)
Beatrice will be able to efficiently operate a pretreatment facility on a
seasonal basis.
(Declaration of D. Jenkins, pp. 5-6; Declaration of R. von Langen, pp.
15-16.)
.� In peak season, Beatrice's BOD discharge is twice the amount generated by
the total population of the City of Fullerton.
(Declaration of R. von Langen, "Local Limits Review for Biochemical Oxygen
Demand", p. 12, Exhibit "A".)
In peak season, Beatrice's discharge of BOD increased approximately 18%
between 1984 and 1987.
Without the Districts' BOD limitations, in peak season, Beatrice and other
high volume BOD dischargers would cause violations of the Districts' NPDES
permit limits.
(Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 3, 13- 14.)
Since 1974, the Districts have spent over $300 million, and over the next 10
years, will spend $1 billion to expand and improve the Districts' treatment
facilities.
(Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 14-15.)
Without enforcement of the Districts' BOD policy, the Districts will be
required to expend $22 million in capital costs for construction of treatment
facilities merely to treat Beatrice's BOD discharges.
(Declaration of S. Hough, p. 6.)
The Districts' action to issue a permit with conditions to protect the
environment, is not a "project", but even if it were, the action is exempt from
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA").
(California Code Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15307, 15308 and 15321.)
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
JUNE 14, 1989
1) UPCOMING MEETINGS
A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - TENTATIVELY, THE FISCAL
POLICY COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28TH
AT 5:00 P.M.
B. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL MEET
ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28TH AT 5:30 P.M.
( INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: )
RA CHELL N
AND
EDWARD ALLEN
- OR -
(WES BANNISTER) yS
Air �F'5
�./ -END OF REPORT-
-1-
AGENDA ITEM 38: RECESS ANNOUNCEMENT
WE WILL TAKE ABOUT A 5-MINUTE RECESS NOW TO SET UP FOR THE
DISTRICT 3 HEARING.
WE WOULD ASK THAT ALL DISTRICT 3 DIRECTORS MOVE TO THE
CENTER TABLES IN THE FIRST TWO ROWS FOR THE HEARING.
IF YOU ARE NOT A DISTRICT 3 DIRECTOR BUT WISH TO STAY FOR
THE HEARING. PLEASE ALLOW THE DISTRICT 3 DIRECTORS TO MOVE TO THE
FRONT CENTER TABLES.
WE WILL RECONVENE IN 5 MINUTES.
METING DATE June 16, 1989 TIME 7:30 ).m. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7. 11. 13 a Ib
DISTRICT I JOINT BOARDS �n�r
(CRANK)........HANSON....... (VERELLEN).........ALLEN.......
(YOUNG)........GRISET......7 (GREEN)............BANNISTER...
(KENNEDY)......HOESTEREY...A/ (WEDAA)............BIGONGER....
<POTH).........ST.NTON..... (NORBY)............CA TLIN......I
\ (HAFT).............COX..........X_ 4
DISTRICT 2 (PERRY)............CULLER......
(KENNEDY)..........EDGAR....... �
<NORBYI........CATLIN...... ✓ (YILSON)...........MNRO.......y_
_
(GRAHAM).......MAHOMEY.....� _ _ (CHESSEN)..........GRIFFIN..... V V
(WEDAA)........BIGONGER....� (YOUNG)............GRISET...... V y_
(YOUNG)........GRISET...... ✓ (CRANK)............HANSON......
(NELSON).......•BMfiS........
JG (KENNEDY)..........HOE STEREY...
(S[OTi)........NEUL........�G (NELSON)...........61MMP,......
(DOWNEY).......NEWTON....... ( )............KANEL.......� -V—
(CULVER).......PERRY....... (EDGAR)............KENNEDY......Y--- _71
(HUNTER).......PICKLER...... (GRAHAM)...........MAHONEY..... 4 V
(FASBENDER)....SILIEL...... (SILVA)............MAYS........
(BARRERA)......SMITH....... (SCOTT)............NEAL........
(ROTH).........STUNTON....._ (WEDIN)............NE LSD....... L
(DOWNEY)...........NEWTON......
DISTRICT } (HUNTER)...........PERRY.......
(HUNTER)...........PICKLER.....
(DUDE).........POLLS ......JG ( UK ).............PLUMMER..... L
(VEDIN)........ALLEN.......JG _ (DUKE)STNTON)..........ROTH.
(GREEN)........BANNISTE ...�_ �_ (ATANT)............ROT.........
(GREEN)........CATLIS......_G = (WILES)............SSEPIOAN....
(MERRY)........CUTLER...... A/ (MILES)............SIEFEN......
(PERRY)........CULVER......�G (FRSBENDER)........SILIEL......
(WILSON).......BABMl.......� (BURRERU)..........SMITH.
......
(CHESSEN)......GRIFFIN..... / (ROTH).............STANTON..... �O,n
(YDUNG)........GR15E T...... _ (HART/BIN('.........9MIIIMRl..... _
( )........KANEL.......JG (MILLER)...........SWAN........
(GRAM MI.......MAXONEY....• L (WWHLSTROM)........SYLVIA......� L
(SCOTT)........NEAL........ ? (FERRYMAN/GREEN)...MANNER...... v_
(HUNTER).......PICKLER.....JL (BICONGER).........WEDAA.......
(WILES)........SIEFEN...... (ISLES)............WEDIN.......
(ROTH).........STANTON..... (BANNISTER)........WINCHELL....
(WAHLSTROM)....SYLVIA......JG
DISTRICT 5 �� STAFF:
SYLVESTER... Lt
(HART).........COX......... . _ — BROWN.......JL
(HART).........STRPM...... y— ANDERSON....JL
(STANTON)......ROTH........ �_ CLARKE......J�
CLAWSON.....JG
DISTRICT 6 DAWES....... v
. _ FILECCIA....
(FERRYMAN).....MANNER...... V Y HODGES......JG_
(HART).. .PLUMEN..... KYLE........�
(STA.TON...... ROTH.. .....
LINGER......JG
OOTEN.......JG
DISTRICT 7 STREED......JL
VON LANGEN J�
(BARRERA)......SMITH.......y WINSOR......
(KENNED. ......EDGAR.......JC
(YOUNG)........GRISET......
(STANTON)......ROTH........ �wLLQJiAA{Wi,�.
(AGRAH)........SHERIDAN....JC
(COX)..........RRRCST.....�G
(GREEN)........YAHMER......,K _ _ O p"
T HERS: MOOERU .... ✓ M,.X�.�Vga WI/14L.,.
DISTRICT 11 IDS...........
AO ANWAR.......
(SILYA) . MAYS........ DEMIR ......__(GC Q A,, 4(B.NN1iTER) YINCNELL.... FLEMING.....
(ROTH).........ST HOHENER.....J aQVHDUGX.. 'DISTRICT 13 HOWWRD......JC Q . 4 ,Ao .�.
HUNT........_
(BICONCER).....XEDUA....... KNOPF....... V`
(HUNTER).......PI CKLER..... LINDSTROM..._ a 4
(STANTON)......RO TH........ LYNCH....... SVI.)L
(ISLES).)......SMITH....... STONE........ �
DISTRICT 16
(ISLES)........YEDlN........ �_ STONE......._ `Y 1�O1w+Ww^
YOUNG......._
d� Q
(MILLER).......SWAM........ �9�LL'yC
(EDCUR)........NENNEDY.....
N).(STRNTO .....LOTH........_ , w, ,Sl(NGRRN)........SHERIDAN.... ✓
(BARRERA)......WITH.......J/
06/14/89 C• -��
PLEASE SIGN IN
June 14, 1989 Board Meeting
\� NAME AGENCY/FIRM
JVA^ /rtGGr Oc5! 0
el (is'r'q �7 r` `,V
7A nN D A I-L i V1U?;Vvf 04-L ( AUp 5
52
/��/C��vfJ'FS/�r�ri/X�nx�) /c-ea4ke7�L �C•,Q/`/i�F
F d 1-I o dges
`l �S�l W /ems /7 d.'A�• C!�S�a•:�j
_� bt.(j &A/L r2_ p _9,tATR-tct
6d �G U461141 �uQ
�BG7LT C TIIOM(4-S /I�N.xv/rrn�G 4/u�sr�,mrts C/E�3/h-��
el,� / 1 ° Sl�aar � Z— l�rb .rnr .Vvn,. 4l,r�rf"�/j
6-14-89 JOINT MEETING NOTES
&6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman
The Joint Chairman announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee was tentatively
scheduled to meet on Wednesday, June 28th, at 5:00 p.m.
He then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, June 28th, at
5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Wes Bannister and Roland Bigonger to attend.
/6(b) - Report of the General Manager
The General Manager reported that the Districts were the recipient of AMSA's
Gold Award because we have met all NPDES Permit requirements. They also
received EPA's Award of Excellence for the last two years. Staff is quite proud
of these achievements and are able to accomplish these things because of the
Boards' support. Smith commented that the Directors are very proud of staff.
Mr. Sylvester requested that the Directors' return the form included in some of
their folders with regard to their attendance at the upcoming workshops on the
Action Plan.
N6(c) - Report of the General Counsel
The General Counsel reported that there would be a closed session under Agenda
Item No. 16 concerning a matter of possible litigation.
He also noted with regard to Item 12, the Districts just received a couple hours
ago a letter of protest relating to the bid on Job No. PI-34-2. He recommended
that the matter be deferred until the next regular Board meeting in July in
order to give his office an opportunity to investigate the matter.
I7 - Approval of minutes
Director Catlin commented on the May 17th Minutes of the Joint Adjourned
Meeting. He said they were exceptionally well done and commended staff for an
excellent job.
ill - Nominations for Joint Chairman
Director Griffin nominated Ronald B. Hoesterey for Joint Chairman. It was
moved, seconded and duly carried that nominations be closed.
#12 - Award of Job No. PI-34-2
Joint Chairman Smith reiterated that the staff recommended that this item be
continued to the next regular meeting in July since there as been a protest
received regarding it. It was so moved and seconded to do so.
N14(b)(3) re budget
Director Hart asked what the total budget amount was. Gary Streed replied that
this was just two parts of the budget and the individual District budgets would
be submitted to the Boards also. The total of the two is $
816(a) - CLOSED SESSION
The Boards convened in closed session at 7:50 p.m. regarding a matter involving
possible litigation. They reconvened in regular session at 8:03 p.m.
M39 - DISTRICT 3 re Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc.
Richard Marsh, of the Los Angeles law firm of Knapp, Marsh, Jones and Doran, who
was acting as Special Counsel to the Board for the hearing, briefly reviewed the
proceedings for conducting the hearing . He stated that the purpose of the
hearing was to consider appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. Appeal is from the
decision of the General Manager to issue Permit No. 3-1-143 on February 15,
1989. Appeal procedure is provided in District Ordinance Establishing
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities. Hearing Procedure is also
in accordance with Rules on Appeal adopted by the Board. shall be
given to file certain documentary evidence on behalf of BeatrTc_er_a_n3 Districts'
staff. The hearing is being conducted based on basis of written statements and
contentions of both parties. Beatrice has submitted declarations of James N.
Williams, Robert C. Thomas and John Baird. The Districts' staff has submitted
under penalty of perjury, declarations by Richard W. von Langen, Stephen C.
Hough, David Jenkins, Kelly Christensen and Blake Anderson.
These declarations and exhibits attached to declarations, together with oral
testimoney, constitute the record upon whish this Board should case its
decision. Beatrice has also filed a request to cross examine each of the
individuals who filed declarations on behalf of the Districts.
The issue before the Board is whether or not this Board should grant the
appeal or reaffirm staff's decision on permit limits and deny appeal.
With regard to Rules on Appeal , this Board is not bound by any technical
information. Heresay is admissable to support evidence that is otherwise
supported in the record. Each party can make opening and closing statements.
Following conclusion of statements, this Board should undertake deliberation in
open session.
Chairman Polis stated that he wanted to clear the record on one item with regard
to a letter from Mr. Blodget wherein he made reference to the fact that staff
had not sent out all documents to Directors. Director Polis stated that staff
had been sending everything to him.
(a) Opened hearing at 8:28 p.m.
(1) Blake Anderson gave the Directors a brief presentation on the historical
background of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. and the Beatrice site location. He
also gave a brief orientation on the Districts' treatment process and the
Beatrice site location. He explained terminology such as BOO (biological oxygen
demand) which is a measure of strength of the wastewater. He added that
bacteria require oxygen to live. Also reviwed suspended solids or non-dissolved
material versus dissolved material. He reviewed the diagrams on the wall
showing the various steps in the Districts' treatment processes: Primary
Treatment - Secondary Treatment; 1/3 of flow receives secondary treatment.
Plant 1 and Plant 2 effluent goes out to the ocean after having received primary
and partial secondary treatment.
Districts are under permit by EPA and State of California. Requirements for BOD
have become increasingly stringent. Influent BOO is 500,000; effluent is
300,000. We are down to 180,000. We need to constantly remain below permit
limits.
-2-
Since 1978 have added 101 mgd in primary treatment and 121 mgd in secondary.
Within the next five years, will need an additional 60 mgd primary and 44 mgd
secondary treatment. The 30-year Master Plan indicates a need for 400 mgd
capacity. He stated that it is the Districts' intention to remain in compliance
�..i constantly with regulations imposed by EPA and State of California.
One part of the story is industrial source control which (1) Prevents the
pass-through of untreated BOD to the ocean. We have limited the amount of
soluable BOB because only a portion is treated with secondary treatment; and
(2) Protects the secondary part of the treatment plant. Bacteria culture has to
have optimum conditions to provide proper treatment. If there is a major change
in sewage content, we don't get performance we need to. The secondary part of
the plant is a living, breathing organism and must be stable.
Mr. Anderson then showed an aerial video of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson's facilities.
(7) (8:43 p.m.) Joel Moskowitz of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. stated that for
the record, the Districts' staff has not asked to cross examine their
representatives but they are here if they wish to.
Said he wanted to make two points. What has happened to Beatrice here in this
new permit is to restrict them from 40,000 lbs. to 26,700 lbs. with three months
just before canning season. Beatrice is the same. It hasn't grown. There are
seasonal variations.
The reason why this restriction is being placed on Beatrice is to accommodate
growth that moved into the County. That is why. We suggest that you go to your
old users and say that they have to move out of town or partially shut down
operations and spend millions of dollars. Unfair to ask Beatrice to do this.
Even if it were fair and reasonable to spend $4 million to accommodate growth,
to ask us just three months before canning season is now fair. We need to
address the interim limits. Can't build a plant in three months. It is unfair
to ask us to partially shut down and lay off employees. Isn't fair.
He then stated he would like to cross examine Districts' staff.
He then cross examined Rich von Langen. Tom Woodruff responded to cross
examination also. (9:27 p.m.)
Moskowitz then cross examined Kelly Christensen (9:44 p.m.) ; Steve Hough
(9:51 p.m.) ; Blake Anderson (10:06 p.m.); and David Jenkins (10:24 p.m.)
RECESS called from 10:25 to 10:40 p.m. Then finished cross examination of David
Jenkins.
Moskowitz closing statement. The real concern of Beatrice is that they have to
take $4 million and became Orange County Sanitation Districts. What worries me
is if they have to build a treatment plant in the middle of a residential
neighborhood. If we can't build this plant, we can't run. They don't have to
consider CEQA. We do. If we can't get this thing done, then the days of the
plant are numbered. In 30-year plan will charge another $2 million. We have
been here since the beginning. Not complaining about additional money. This
particular project is senseless to build an satellite anerobic treatment plant
in a residential neighborhood. The Districts already have one and we don't. If
we can't get the thing permitted, we are gone. Orange County is the fastest
growing area in the country. You have to shoulder the load of new growth. Not
opposed to contribution. We haven't changed. Shouldn't ask us to do this.
-3-
Re big issue of anerobic plants, you can't let them do it to us this canning
season. We have to cut back 30%. We have contracted with tomatoe growers.
Don't mind paying a lot of money. This short-range thing to cut back by 1/3
isn't right and we can't do it without partial shutdown of our operation. Are
asking you not to do that. What kind of operation do you want in the long term?
Don't think you can get an anerobic treatment plant in a neighborhood. The air
quality permit could take 211 years. In the long-run this just isn't going to
happen. Thank you. (10:50 p.m.)
Tom Woodruff then presented his closing statement. He stated that his job now
is not to put in any more evidence. I have prepared Items of Evidence and
declarations of staff and consultants and that document really says the whole
case. Would like to summarize what we have put forward and what the issues
really are and why what the staff has done is only right and fair and is fully
authorized under the provisions of law and fully in accordance with what is
necessary for the overall wellbeing of this District, and more particularly, the
2 million residents and businesses, both commercial and industrial , that are
served by the Districts and the hundreds and thousands of other people who must
use the marine offshore facilities for fishing and sailing and boating to ensure
that the environment is at all times protected in accordance with policies
established and enforced by the Districts for many many years.
Said he had prepared a summary of remarks which he displayed on an overhead
projector while he reviewed them. (SEE ATTACHED LISTING)
TLW advised that negotiations with Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson weren't new. Referred
to 1985 letter telling them that we are experiencing BOD problems and the
Districts were going to be mandating the reduction of their limits. There has
been this dialogue for many months conducted on a high professional level
between the engineering and technical people. Said he got involved also when
the thing started to heat up. He thought the Directors had been unfairly
disparaged in the last couple weeks with a lot of misinformation going to them.
Re requiringy a satellite treatment plant, 356 other industries have spent from
$25,000 to 55 million to build pretreatment facilities. The issues were dollars
and when they filed the appeal , they have filed a lot of challenges.
With regard to Beatrice's contention that the District has no legal basis to
impose these limits, Mr. Woodruff began listing the federal laws and District
ordinances mandating these actions. (See attached report, pages 1 and 2)
He added this is simply a sham to say that this District doesn't have authority
just because there is no 10,000 lb. number in the Ordinance. The original
universe was Anaheim Citrus and then we received information from IPT.
Geographically, that is outside the District but in 1972 the District entered
into an agreement with SAWPA and they have ownership of capacity rights for
30 mgd. IPT is within their service area and they have all the legal right to
be here. Contractually, they are within the Districts.
The authority is key. We comply with all legal requirements. Beatrice
understood obligations and chances are for this year there will probably only be
one month in 1989 that they will have to do something out of the ordinary. May
have to bring it to the Districts. They are now playing on your sympathies
saying that they are going to shut down. Have had all sorts of planning and
warnings. As indicated by Dr. Jenkins, they can operate a pretreatment
facility. They could come down here and get a starter for their anerobic plant
from the Districts. You would think this was some beautiful garden. There are
v
-4-
residences on the easterly boundary. An airport on the western boundary.
Hughes factory to north and hundreds of acres of industries including
refineries. This is an industrial park. The treatment plant in the middle of a
residential community is not the case. The residential area is 15-20 feet below
o..i grade which doesn't protect them against odors but does protect them against
noise, etc.
He referred to charts and District map and City of Fullerton location. They say
let us send down the pipe all that we generate because it the growth in Orange
County that is causing this. There is growth in Orange County. We have built
expansions in both primary and secondary treatment. This District has the
responsibility to provide treatment for all areas and for new growth. Re BOD
graph we were ordered by EPA to cut amount of BOD to 1/2 from 377,000 lbs. to
187,000 lbs. We didn't like it but have to do it. The philosophy of this
District is that we protect them all--land, air and water. In the peak season
we are operating facilities close to full. We can't operate at red line but
don't have a lot of room.
When the decision relative to limits for Anaheim Citrus, the parent company,
Farley Industries, said that their capital investment exceeded their net worth.
It is not an undue obligation we are putting on them. Re CEQA requirements,
this is a legal plant. If they choose to build a treatment plant, we have set
the schedule and they will have to go to City Hall and maybe they will have a
CEQA issue. We are only concerned with the flow of the liquid coming down the
pipe and conditions related to it. There are many other concerns. I think the
thrust of this is that they say they are unduly being singled out. They are
doing nothing different. They may not be handling any more tomatoes. Maybe it
Is mutations, don't know. Whatever is happening, they are sending us a lot more
BOD but they will not do anything about it. That is the whole issue. They have
got to step with the rest of their fellows in the industries out there. Whether
they are plating industries or printed circuit manufacturers, our concern is BOD
discharge. Beatrice has other industries in Orange County. They operate a
plant in Santa Ana. They are not now in compliance with EPA. With regard to
air emissions, is the water any less important to protect? Of course not. They
can handle it. With the limit of 27,600 lbs., maybe will have one month that
they can do something. I think the Board is familiar enough with all of this to
know what has to be done to protect the Districts and the environment.
In closing, referred to Ordinance 306 for District No. 3 which is part of the
record that we are operating under. Also referred to the Districts' discharge
permit of 1985 from EPA. Indicated it was available to read. We have specific
sanctions and authorization for imposing these conditions. Nothing further to
say. (11:20 p.m.)
Director Catlin asked if any industries were to come in and add a large plant,
would the Districts be obligated to take it or would they give them the same
type of conditions? Blake replied that we wouldn't allow them to discharge over
the 10,000 lb. per day limit.
Question asked, why would one industry be singled out? Should we have the same
type of thing for residences? BPA answered, an individual discharger does not
impose the variations in BOD strength as a food processor does. We have to
tried to be as practical as we can. Larger dischargers could more adequately
operate a system like this. Wouldn't advise getting down to smaller industries.
Catlin asked, if the size of other industries exceed the limit, would you
a./ restrict them also? He was told yes but Beatrice and two others are in a class
by themselves. He added that we might change the category sometime in the
future to 5,000-10,000 lbs.
-5-
Asked, what about large restuarants, such as Knott's Berry Farm? If they were
discharging greater than 10,000 lbs. per day, perhaps would need to limit them
also.
.... Is there a place in Orange County where we can't accept any more residences
because of BOD? Answered, no, we are constructing new facilities to take care
of those demands.
Director Griset noted that reference was made earlier to the cost if Beatrice
was to undertake pretreatment facilities. Is $4 million a good estimate? Rich
von Langen replied that that was an estimate we received from someone who has
been to the site. If we didn't limit their BOD, the Districts would be required
to spend $22 million merely to treat Beatrice's BOD discharge.
Steve Hough added that if the District were to receive this waste and have to
treat it in order to reduce the 40,000 lbs. of BOD, it would require 15 mgd
capacity which has an estimated capital cost of E22 million.
Griset suggested it would be prudent to spend $4 million to avoid paying
E22 million in Huntington Beach. We seem to be having a great deal of BOD
growth in this District. We have a contributor to the BOD problem whose
amount is stable. In fact, this service area is growing in BOD content.
Steve Hough replied that the 40,000 lbs. is diluted by wastewater so we don't
treat 5 mgd, have to treat 15 mdg. Would be cheaper for them to build a
pretreatment plant.
Catlin commented that in absolute amounts, this industry has a reasonably stable
amount of BOD over the past five years. Has increased 18%. We are not as
concerned over the percentage of increase of this user compared to the growth as
a whole, is that correct? Blake answered, in terms of soluble BOD, it is not
quite true. We can't trace down what pump, etc. is causing the problem.
Beatrice has paid $1.7 million in operations and maintenance costs and
$1 million in capital replacement. This doesn't provide full cost to treat
their wastewater. They have not been singled out. Have been doing quite well
with us over the last few years.
Director Allen asked what type of response we received when we offered to take
their excess by truck? Rich replied we didn't receive any response. We offered
but no response.
Pickler asked if this appeal is denied, what will they do? Tom Woodruff replied
that he would like to think they would come in and sign their permit and
continue as a good neighbor. If they choose not to, we will see them in court.
This is the last step here.
Question asked, does the District have the right or power to force them to stop
causing the problem with BOD? TLW answered, I would recommend that this Board
adopt a position that we place them on notice that in fact we are going to hold
them to the schedule. If they win, we will address it then. If they lose, we
would expect to hold them to this time limit. When 1991-92 comes around they
may end up trucking a lot of waste because they will be at the 10,000 lb. limit.
Very strongly urged that the Board adopt that position. Said to Board, you have
to make that decision.
-6-
Polls asked Dr. Jenkins re odors associated with anaerobic plants. Is there a
way of substantially cutting down this odor where you wouldn't be offended over
the smell of the tomatoes. Ripening will be continuing within the tanks. This
smell would probably be better than that. Dr. Jenkins said he has visited other
anaerobic plants and they have operated with substantially odor-free conditions.
Polls also commented that two figures were given re amount of land needed for
anaerobic plant, which one is right--2 acres or .7 acres? He was told the
estimate made by Beatrice was for 2 acres. Our estimate was from two equipment
vendores based on information we had on record. Disparity could be engineering
judgment or it could be that Beatrice was planning to locate about one mile away
from where we chose and pipe cost could then be E1-91 million. Figure is closer
to the .7 acres.
Catlin commented on results of CSDOC industrial pretreatment program which is
the basic element of Orange County's successful industrial treatment program.
It started in July 1976. In July 1978 we requested installation of pretreatment
facilities to maintain California Ocean requirements re Phase III additional
facilities. This indicates a knowledge that this type of program was in
progress. Were the industries in O.C. involved in that study? TLW replied
that the last three ordinances, in 1976, 1983 and the one coning up next month,
all worked with industries. The new ordinances was revised 23 or 24 times.
Took us 18 months to do that ordinance. The industrial sector and ad hoc
committee participated with staff here to talk about limitations on metals,
pollutants, etc. Rich von Langan added that Mr. Baird participated in the last
revision. Catlin asked, was this general knowledge within the industries? Rich
answered yes.
Griset asked if the Board acts here to deny their appeal and Beatrice were to
comply and build this treatment facility, is it your understanding that they
would need to go to the Fullerton City Council to get certain approvals for this
facility? TLW indicated that he couldn't say for certain. It is a 63-acre
site. I expect it is subject to existing land use permits from the City.
Whether they would require additional permits I don't really know. This is just
one more piece of equipment and would be processed as part of their overall
operation. In terms of approval re CEQA, would have to get City to sign off or
say no impact or may need to prepare an EIR. Griset then asked if City would
not authorize such a facility, does this Board have the authority to mandate the
construction of this facility over objections of City Council? Answered, no, I
don't believe so.
Director Kanel comnented he had the race track in his City. They don't make
them come before the Council every time they make a change. Said I believe that
is an industrial plant and they would be adding more machinery. Just bigger
machinery. This whole thing is affecting the entire Districts. I don't see why
a big corporation like this is not complying and doing what should be done. I
would be ready to deny their appeal.
Pickler(?) MOVED to deny appeal . Motion SECONDED.
Special Counsel Marsh then suggested some findings that should be included in
motion and that the motion should read as follows:
(1) On February 15, 1989, the District issued Permit No. 3-1-143 ("Permit") to
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ("Beatrice").
(2) This Permit contains limits on the discharge of Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(BOO) as set forth herein.
-7-
(3) The BOD limits are in accord with previously developed discharge limits
applicable to industrial dischargers of disproportionately large amounts of
BOD.
(4) The BOD limits set forth in the Permit are necessary in order to meet NPDES
Permit requirements and prevent pass-through interference with the
treatment processes of Plant No. 2.
(5) The methodology of restricting the introduction of BOD into Plant No. 2 as
evidenced by the Permit is consistent with the guidelines promulgated by
EPA.
(6) The Permit was validly issued under the laws of the State of California and
the District's Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities.
(7) The issuance of the permit is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act because (a) The issuance of this
permit is not a project or (b) If the issuance of the permit is determined
to be a project, it is categorically exempt under 14 Cal Code of
Regulations Sections 15307; 15308 and 15321.
(8) The classification which distinguishes Beatrice and other high-strength BOD
dischargers from other users of the Districts' sewerage system is
reasonable.
(9) There are feasible methods by which Beatrice can obtain the BOD levels set
forth in the Permit.
(10) These methods can be implemented for costs which are reasonable in light of
all the circumstances prevailing.
Now, therefore, this Board does hereby deny the appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson,
Inc. ; does ratify the action taken by the District staff in issuing Permit
No. 3-1-143; and does confirm all the provisions thereof.
Director Catlin commented that he had examined all the this material very
carefully. I have read every word and heard everyone. Said he asked himself,
has the District staff and Board proceeded with administrative due process (?)
in setting limits? Does the Boards have approved ordinances and can you do
this? Does the industrial user of the wastewater system have a grandfathered
right to discharged under past standards? Don't think so. Do we have authority
to establish permit limitations that might create an economical problem? I
think the Districts have a mandate, as well as a moral obligation, to protect
the environment. That is the community responsibility. We have an obligation
to meet the standards. There has to be a start somewhere to preserve the
environmental integrity. Don't think Districts should be guided by lesser
standards of other POTW's. It is hard to believe that a professional
organization with expertise and knowledge of wastewater industries would not
have their ear to the ground a long time ago. I can't believe Beatrice doesn't
know what is going on. I think we have the responsibility to take the
leadership in this. I speak for the motion that has been made.
CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
Griset added, what I am looking for is equity--if we could agree on what is
an equitable allocation of costs would be for each of the systems. How do we
-8-
schedule those impacts? What I have heard from Beatrice is what are they going
to do with business arrangements in the next few weeks. I wonder what this
decision will do re immediate impacts. Does this reflect a process we can be
proud of? I can't immediately respond to this motion. Each of us needs to pay
our way.
Siefen commented that they acted on five ordinances that night increasing fees.
The people I represent are having to look at increased costs. We have people
who are contributing to the growth. I don't think we will get any results this
year but we have to start. Everybody in this District is trying to pay their
own way and looking forward to the future. I vote for the denial .
CALLED FOR THE QUESTION AGAIN.
Griffin stated, I am inclined to think, through what I have heard this evening,
that staff, in fact, will continue to exercise cooperation and its willingness
to allow for a reasonable transition to the ultimate final decision. Don't
think any of us have any idea of what the final design will be. There is
certainly competent and professional people on both sides.
Polis noted that the question had been called for.
ROLL CALL VOTE on motion including findings and wording suggested by Special
Counsel . MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned 11:55 p.m.
-9-
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Clean Water Act") mandated the
development by the U.S. EPA of a National Pretreatment Program designed
to p=n the discharge to POTW's of pol
through or are otherwise incompatible with
(Clean Water Act, Section 307 (b) (c)
7 ?
The U.S. EPA has adopted a comprehens
dischargers and establishing pretreatment standards and requirements for
industrial users and mandating local POTW's to implement this program by
adoption of their own pretreatment programs.
(Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 403.)
The Federal Pretreatment Regulations prohibit any user from introducing into
any POTW, any pollutant, including BOD, which passes through or causes
interference with the POTW's treatment processes or operations.
(Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 4035(b)(4).)
r..
Both state and local law authorize the Districts to regulate Beatrice's BOD
discharge into the sewer system.
(California Government Code Section 54739;
Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201, 2O8(B)(4)and 302.1(c).)
The Districts complied with applicable federal, state and local regulations in
developing the BOD discharge limitation policy.
(Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 403.1, et seq.;
California Government Code Section 54739;
Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201 and 208(B) (4).)
Locally established limits imposed upon individual industrial users should be
preventative rather than reactive.
The Districts have followed the express published guidelines of EPA for
pretreatment regulation and implementation, by considering all relevant
treatment plant and environmental information, together with sound
engineering and scientific data in establishing the Districts' BOD discharge
limits.
(EPA Guidance Manual on Development and Implementation of Local
Discharge Limitations Under the Pretreatment Program (Dec. 1987), Section
1.3.2.)
District's Ordinance No. 306 authorizes the District's staff to impose
pretreatment and discharge limitations conditions on industrial users.
(Districts' Ordinance No. 306, Sections 302.1 and 302.2.)
302.1 Class I Permit Application
A. . . .
B. . . .
C. Other information may be required to properly evaluate the
permit application. After evaluation and acceptance of the
data furnished, the District may issue a Class I wastewater
discharge permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in
this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the Chief
Engineer to be necessary to protect the Districts system.
302.2 Class I Permit Conditions, Limitations and
Stipulations that may be in Permit:
A. Mass emission rates regulating incompatible pollutants;
J. Other provisions which may be applicable to insure compliance
with all provisions of this Ordinance;
K. Other terms and conditions determined by the Chief Engineer
to be necessary to protect the District's system.
The Districts' past experience has established that excessive BOD discharges
seriously threaten to both pm throughand interfere with the operation of the
Districts' wastewater treatment plants and jeopardize the Districts' 301(h)
waiver in its NPDES permit.
(Declaration of D. Jenkins, pp. 3-5;
Declaration of R. von Langen, p. 13.)
Beatrice has the ability to implement procedures to significantly reduce BOD
discharges even without construction of a pretreatment facility.
(Declaration of K. Christensen, pp. 2-3; Declaration of R. von Langen, pp.
16-17.)
Beatrice will be able to efficiently operate a pretreatment facility on a
seasonal basis.
(Declaration of D. Jenkins, pp. 5-6; Declaration of R. von Langen, pp.
15-16.)
u
.� In peak season, Beatrice's BOD discharge is twice the amount generated by
the total population of the City of Fullerton.
(Declaration of R. von Langen, Tocal Limits Review for Biochemical Oxygen
Demand", p. 12, Exhibit "A".)
In peak season, Beatrice's discharge of BOD increased approximately 18%
between 1984 and 1987.
Without the Districts' BOD limitations, in peak season, Beatrice and other
high volume BOD dischargers would cause violations of the Districts' NPDES
permit limits.
(Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 3, 13- 14.)
Since 1974, the Districts have spent over $300 million, and over the next 10
years, will spend $1 billion to expand and improve the Districts' treatment
facilities.
(Declaration of R. von Langen, pp. 14-15.)
Without enforcement of the Districts' BOD policy, the Districts will be
required to expend $22 million in capital costs for construction of treatment
facilities merely to treat Beatrice's BOD discharges.
(Declaration of S. Hough, p. 6.)
The Districts' action to issue a permit with conditions to protect the
environment, is not a "project", but even if it were, the action is exempt from
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA").
(California Code Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15307, 15308 and 15321.)
1
`.✓ 2
3
4
5
6
7
BEFORE THE BOARD OF
8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NUMBER 3
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
9
10 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL ) Permit No. 3-1-143
11 OF BEATRICE/HUNT-WESSON, INC. )
FINDINGS
12 )
13
i
14 1. On February 15, 1989, the District issued Permit
15 No. 3-1-143 ( "Permit" ) to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ( "Beatrice" ) . i
16 2. This Permit contains limits on the discharge of
17 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) as set forth therein.
18 3 . These BOD limits are in accord with previously developed
19 discharge limits applicable to industrial dischargers of dispropor-
20 tionately large amounts of BOD.
21 4. The BOD limits set forth in the Permit a ,a _ne3eAsar
I
22 � order to meet NPDES permit requirements and prevent^i.^.�erference ,
23 � with the treatment processes of Plant No. 2 .
24 � 5 . The methodology of restricting the introduction of BOD
25 into Plant No. 2 as evidenced by the Permit is consistent with the
26 guidelines promulgated by EPA.
27 /
28 /
5450.2F1-1
1 6 . The Permit was validly issued under the laws of the State (.
2 of California and the District's Regulations For use of District' i
3 Sewerage Facilities. I
i
4 7 . The issuance of the Permit is exempt from the recuire-
6 ments of the California Environmental Quality Act because
6 a) The issuance of this permit is not a project
7 or
8 b) If the issuance of the permit is determined to be a
9 project, it is categorically exempt under 14 Cal Code
10 of Regulations sections 15307; 15308 and 15321 .
11 8. The classification which distinguishes Beatrice and other
12 high strength SOD dischargers from other users of the District' s
13 sewerage system is reasonable.
14 9. There are feasible methods by which Beatrice can obtain
15 the BOD levels set forth in the Permit.
16 10 . These methods can be implemented for costs which are
17 reasonable in light of all the circumstances prevailing.
18
NOW, THEREFORE, this Board does hereby deny the appeal of
19
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. , does ratify the action taken by the
20 District staff in issuing Permit No. 3-1-143 and does ccrfirm all
21 the provisions thereof.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5450.2F1-2/sa 2•
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
JUNE 149 1989
Ppt1TATfON
Y aaav°lava OOI,,
O .l
U � N
Sloee 1954
NgryGE co
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1. 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on June 14, 1989. at 7:30 p.m.,
in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Foilwing the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation
the roll was called and the Secretary reported a Quarum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as fell ws:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman —Dan
Crank
x Dan Griset, Chairman pro tan Dan Young
x Ronald B. Hoesterey —Ursula Kennedy
_L__Roger Stanton -Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: x A.B. -Buck- Catlin, Chairman _Chris Norby
x Nil l tam 0. Mahoney, Chairman pro tan Beth Graham
%Roland E. Bigonger —Henry W. Weiss
x Oan Griset —Dan Young
Ron Isles %Carrey Nelson
7—James Neal —George Scott
%Arthur G. Newton —Carol Owney
%Bob Perry Norman Culver
%Iry Pickier Fred Hunter
x Wayne Silzel —James T. Fasbender
%Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera
%Roger Stanton _Dan R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman Orbrey Duke
%Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
%Edward L. Allen Paul Verellen
x Wes Bannister —Peter Green
%A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chria Norby
%Norman Culver —Bob Perry
%Don R. Griffin _—Donna L. Chessen
x Dan Griset _Dan Young
%John Kemal
%william D. Mahoney am_Beth Grah
z James Neal George Scott
x Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter
x J.R. -Bob- Siefen —_Owey wiles
a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
%Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom
%Edna Nilson _Victor Grgas
DISTRICT NO. 5: x John C. Cox, Jr., Choi men Evelyn Hart
Donald A. Strauss, Chairman pro tan %Evelyn Hart
7—Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman _James M. Ferryman
x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tom Evelyn Hart
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Choi neon _Fred Barrera
%Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tan Ursula Kennedy
x Dan Griset —Dan Young
a Dan R. Roth —Roger Stanton
x Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran
Donald A. Strauss %John C. Cox, Jr.
x James Wahner _Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tom Mays, Chairman _Jim Silva
x Grace Winchell, Choi roan pro tiesWes Bannister
a Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth
DISTRICT MD. 13: x Henry W. Macias, Chairmen Roland E. Bigonger
%Iry Pickier, Chairman pro tem —Fred Hunter
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
%Wayne Wedin _Ron Isles
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller
%Ursula Kennedy, Chairman pro in —Roger
B. Edgar
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
%Sally Anne Sheridan _Larry Agran
x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
-2-
06/14/89
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P.
Anderson, William N. Clarke, Thomas
M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle,
Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges, John Linder,
Bob Oaten, Rich von Langen, Jim Herberg,
Dan Dillon, Stasia Allen, Mahin Talebi ,
Mike Deblieux
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark
Ide, Richard Marsh, Thomas Nixon, Jamel
Demir, Stephen Hough, Walt Howard, Phil
Stone, Dewey Wiles, David Jenkins, Bob
Finn, George A. Randall , Paul Dunning, John
Baird, Joel S. Moskowitz, Gary Stetzel ,
Bill Blodgett, James N. Williams, Yvonne ..
Castle, Robert C. Thomas
DISTRICTS 2 8 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file an accept resigna-
tion of Ma or Laurann Cook of the That the letter from Mayor Laurann Cook
city of Fountain vaiiey and seating resigning from the Boards of Directors
first and second alternates to the of District Nos. 2 and 3, be, and is
Mayor hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be
seated as members of the Boards:
Districts Active Director Alternate Director '
2 a 3 James Neal George Scott
DISTRICTS 3 8 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute-excerpts
re Boar ppointments That the minute excerpts and resolutions
from the fallowing re election of
mayors, appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards,
be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor)
Agency District(s) Active Director Alternate Director
Costa Mesa 6 James A. Wahner James M. Ferryman
Sanitary
District
Huntington 3 Wes Bannister* Peter Green
Beach
Seal Beach 3 Edna Wilson Victor Grgas*
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that the
Report of the Joint Chairman Fiscal Policy Committee was tentatively
scheduled to meet on Wednesday, June 28th,
at 5:00 p.m.
Chairman Smith then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday,
June 28th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Wes Bannister and Roland Bigonger
to attend and participate in the discussions.
-3-
06/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the
Report of the General Manager Districts were the recipients of the
Association of Metropolitan Sewerage
Agencies' Gold Award for 1988. This award recognizes the Districts' continuous
compliance with all requirements of their National Pollutant Discharge Elmination
System (NPDES) Permit. He noted that the Districts had also received the
Environmental Protection Agency's Award of Excellence for the last two years.
Mr. Sylvester commented briefly on the upcoming workshops for Directors on the
Districts' "Action Plan" and requested that the Directors return the form
provided to them indicating whether they would be attending one of the four
workshops scheduled for the following week.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that the
Report of the General Counsel Boards would convene in closed session
later in the meeting concerning a matter
involving possible litigation.
Mr. Woodruff also advised that a letter of protest had been received that
afternoon relative to the award of Job No. P1-34-2, Sludge Handling Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1. Therefore, staff recommended that this matter be
removed from this agenda and deferred to the next regular Board meeting in July
in order to provide an opportunity for his office to investigate the matter.
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Smith stated that the
Deferring consideration of award staff and General Counsel had recommended
of Job No. Pl-34-Z to Advanco that award of Job No. P1-34-2 be removed
Constructors, Inc. from the agenda and deferred to the next
regular meeting of the Boards on July 12 in
order for the General Counsel 's office to investigate and comment on a letter of
protest received relative to award of said job to Advanco Constructors, Inc.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That consideration of award of Job No. P1-34-2, Sludge Handling Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, be, and is hereby, deferred to the regular meeting of
the Boards of Directors on July 12, 1989.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and June 1, 1989, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
-4-
06/14/89
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and May 31, 1989, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and May 31, 1989, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned -
regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be _
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of inutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meetings held May 17, 1989 and June 7, 1989, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meeting held May 17, 1989, the Chair an ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 10, 1989, nor the adjourned
regular meeting held May 179 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be
deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of a ent of Joint
and Individual District uialms That payment of Joint and Individual
District claims set forth on pages "A" and
"B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be,
and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
5/10/89 5/24/89
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Fund - $ 752,470.45 $ 836,257.06
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 4,616,703.09 525,145.87
Joint Working Capital Fund - 186,147.44 1589233.52 -
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 89550.72 6,356.25
DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 16.56
DISTRICT N .'1 - 257,299.64 36,338.50
DISTRICTS - 374,794.43 13,024.35
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 25,597.78 4,244.55
DISTRIC N - 10,895.43 32,146.04 _
DISTRICT - 100,294.96 26,428.67
DISTRICT NK.71 - 1,918.21 6,585.25
DI STRICT NO. 13 - -0- 4.08
DI5TRI� - 69,771.56 56,258.71
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 a 6 JOINT - 851,916.41 5,576.40
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 a 7 JOINT - -0- 35.42
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 689.14 2,785.27
7,257,049.26 51,70KTT670
-5-
06/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase of Twenty-Six
our- ea"ur-wheal Electric uargo That the bid tabulation and
arr ers ecITIca onE1 . A-=, recommendation re award of Purchase of
o w. T. Biiiara, Lnc. Twenty-Six (26) Four-Wheel Electric
cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-145,
be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to W. T. Bitlard,
Inc. for the total amount of $116,220.00 plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase of One - on
urane-mountea, FlatBed T ruck That the bid tabulation and
ecif cation O. -14 o e recommendation re award of Purchase of
Lee, Inc. One 2M-Ton Crane-Mounted, Flat Bed
Truck, Specification No. A-147, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Ole Lee, Inc.
for the total amount of $39,842.00 plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
AuthorIzInq staff to issue Change
rder No. 1 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
No. 38042 issuedo Continental to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase
Graohics for additional printing Order No. 38042 Issued to Continental
services re "Action Plan" Oraft Graphics for additional printing
Collection, Treatment and Disposal services required to print "Action Plan'-
Tacilities Master Plan Draft Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan, increasing the
total authorized amount from $41,500.00 to $49,443.70, including tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
rov n han e Order o. o e
ons and specifications or That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and
ob NO. - specifications for Administration
Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4,
authorizing an addition of $29,180.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts
Corporation for 11 Items of additional work including flagpole illumination,
substitution of aluminum expansion Joint screed Joints for platic screeds,
additional electrical circuitry and ventilation ducting in kitchens; additional
bathroom lighting soffits; and additional valves on HVAC system; and granting a
time extension of 12 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and
is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Chance Order No. 16 to
the p1an5 and sec cat ons 'or That Change Order No. 16 to the plans
Job No. J-1b and specifications for Ocean Outfall
Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15, authorizing an addition of $36,700.00 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. for 11 items of miscellaneous additional work including
modification of locker-room showers and restrooms for handicapped persons;
miscellaneous modifications to walkways and ladders; installation of safety
handrail at termination channel ; modification of roof slope; installation of
separate grounding for DACS computer control system and replacement of current
breakers; removal of undisclosed underground obstructions; and installation of
dryers in the air system and other miscellaneous changes; and granting a time
extension of seven calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and
is hereby, approved.
-6-
06/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
PproV n9 ange r er o. 1 o e
ens and s ecif ca onsf� orb That change order No. 1 to the plans and ,
Job NO. J-ZU specifications for Warehouse and v
Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and
Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an addition of $30,857.00 to
the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for modifications to the water
facilities inspection trench required by the City of Fountain Valley, and removal
of unsuitable building foundation soil; and granting a time extension of
19 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby,
approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving han e Order No. 18 t0
the pians and sec ca ons or That Change Order No. 18 to the plans
Job NOS. an and specifications for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and -
Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cieanouts;
and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of -
$82,028.20 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for eight items of additional
work including removal of undisclosed obstructions; removal of temporary paving;
additional chlorine piping in future bar screen channels; installation of a
District-furnished influent pump; reinforcement modifications in Tunnel No. 4 at
the bar screen and pump roam structures; substitution of wall panels at chlorine
area to accommodate future storage tank changes; and modification of architectural
finish to the building exterior concrete surfaces throughout, be, and is hereby,
approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aoorovinqhen a Order o. 1 0
the ens and sec cations for That Change Order No. 13 to the plans
• ob NOS. P1-n% ?I-Zb, P2- 1 and specifications for Covers for
FZ-JJ and PZ-J4 Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and
Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A",
Job No. P2-34, authorizing an addition of $98,811.72 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. for four items of additional work including caustic pump power
modifications; additional costs due to District-requested delays re modifications
to "H" and uI" scrubbers to accommodate ongoing odor control operations;
Improvements to the steam shunt piping system; and additional asphaltic concrete
curb and trench paving; and granting a time extension of 121 calendar days for
completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A roV n han a rder No. 14 to
the ans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 14 to the plans
ob Nos. P1-Zb, PI-ZbP - 1 and specifications for Covers for
P -33 and P - 4 Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at
Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and
Improvements to Grit Facility 084, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A",
Job No. P2-34, authorizing an addition of $96,311.08 to the contract with Advanco -
Constructors, Inc. for five items of additional work including modifications to
the Plant 1 scrubber complex drain; construction of concrete pad at diesel tank
fueling areas at Building 4 at Plant No. 1 and removal of deteriorated asphaltic
concrete paving; modifications to foul air ductwork at Headworks "C" to
accommodate the new Conveyor Building; installation of methane sensors in each of .
17 primary basin dome enclosures; and rerouting of existing 10-inch digester
cleaning line around the new 48-inch foul air line, be, and is hereby. approved.
-7-
06/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aoorovinq Chanqe Order No. 2 to the
ans and sReciticatiEns for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
Job NO. 1- 7 specifications for Entrances, Site,
Security and Interior Road Improvements
at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, authorizing a net addition of $26,462.14 to the
contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for eight items of miscellaneous additions and
deletions including security fencing modifications; relocation of telephone
conduit; existing manhole modifications and repairs; installation of concrete
thrust block on waste hauler drain line; installation of restroom facility for the
guard shack at the new main entrance; deletion of the Motor Control Center in the
Metering and Diversion Structure; and deletion and modification of asphalt paving,
concrete and piping at the Waste Hauler Dump Station, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ADprovIn Change Order No. 2 to the
tans ango s ecificat ons for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
Job No. - 7 specifications for Miscellaneous
Modifications and Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing a net addition of $33,600.00
to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for seven items of additional work including
rerouting of existing gas and water lines at new meter structure "A";
modifications to new containment facility at dewatering building; increasing ball
valve size from 6" to 8" for 20 valves for Digesters "A" and 08"-; deletion of a
new catch basin which will be incorporated into a future project; rerouting high
strength sludge piping and connections at Digesters "C", "D", "F" and "G"; and
exploratory utility location excavation of underground high strength sludge piping
system, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rov n Adden um No_ to e
Profess onal Services reement That the Selection Committee
with Brown and CaldwelyConsulting certification of the final negotiated
n neers 0r des n o fee relative to Addendum No. 4 to the
ob No. -1 Professional Services Agreement with
Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers
for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for design
of a steam turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of
engine heat to produce additional electricity, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-51,
approving Addendum No. 4 to said Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting
Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead,
plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not
to exceed $68,972.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from
$3,592,838.00 to an amount not to exceed $3,661,810.00. A certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly-carried:
A rov n Addendum No. to the
Pro ess ona ervices A reement That the Boards of Directors hereby
with ones 8 Stokes Associates, adopt Resolution No. 89-52, approving
Inc. for preparation of EIR for Addendum No. 2 to the Professional
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Services Agreement with Jones a Stokes
Element of Master Plan7rogrammatic Associates, Inc. for preparation of an
R Environmental Impact Report for the
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
Element of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan
Programmatic EIR, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories
�..r� within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of
$213,126.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
-8-
06/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizino the a ec on omn ee
o ne o late endum No. to the That the Selection Committee be, and is
Profess ono ery ces reemen hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
with Lee and Ro onsu n No. 2 to the Professional Services
FEn veersP1-re design a Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting
ob o. Engineers for design of Primary
Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, to provide for relocation of
the effluent junction box and polymer facility, realignment of Fuentes Road, and
modifications to the equipment and scum trough hatches on the primary clarifiers.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager o
desi rate members of the Boards That the General Manager be, and is .
and or staff to attend and ar ci- hereby, authorized to designate members
ate in meet n s hearings of the Boards and/or staff to attend and
nf coerences factinspections participate in meetings, hearings,
and other functions conferences facility inspections and
Other functions which, in his opinion,
will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including,
but not limited to, those conducted by state and federal legislative and,
regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies,
California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan
Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel , meals, lodging and incidental -
expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts'
policies and the approved annual budget for 1989-90.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to
execute an agreement with the That the General Manager be, and is
County of Urange for Oata hereby, authorized to execute an
Processing Center services agreement with the County of Orange for
Data Processing Center services relative
to collection of the Districts' annual supplemental user fees.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizi 29 renewala em orar
Permit for Groundwater eanup That renewal of Temporary Permit for
No. 1-23 issued to the County of Groundwater Cleanup No. 1-23 issued to
Orange John Wayne Airport the County of Orange John Wayne Airport,
extending said permit from July 11, 1989
to July 10, 1990, to allow the continued emergency discharge of contaminated
groundwater from Jahn Wayne Airport to the District' s sewer for an additional
one-year period in order to complete construction of the Michelson Bridge included
in the general airport expansion project, be', and is hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue purchase _
orders to soils, concrete and That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
materials testing firms for to issue purchase orders to soils,
services reguiretl for Districts' concrete and materials testing firms for
construction projects services required, beginning June 15,
1989, for the Districts' construction
projects over the next two years, as follows:
-9-
06/14/89
Total
Amount not
To to exceed
��.✓ - Smith-Emery Company $200,000
- Twining Laboratories of 200,006
Southern California, Inc.
- H.V. Lawmaster 8 Company, Inc. 100,000
- Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. 50,000
- Soil and Testing Engineers, Inc. 50,000
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly reviewed the
Annual nomination for Chairman provisions of the Districts' Rules of
of the Joint Administrative Procedure relating to nomination and
Organization election of the Joint Chairman and Vice
Joint Chairman.
This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be
made for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the
Secretary then declared the nominations open.
Director Ronald B. Hoesterey was nominated as a candidate for the office of
Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization.
There being no further nominations, it was moved, seconded and duly carried that
nominations be closed. The Secretary then reported that the election would be
held at the regular July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of
Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts.
Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chairman will also be held at the
regular July meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re NPOES Ocean Monitoring
Program
Receive file and approve
Re ort Moved, seconded and duly carried:
and Recommendation for NPOES cean
Monitoring Program Year Five That the Report and Recommendation
(1989-90) and Selection Committee for NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program
Certification re Amendment No. 6 Year Five (1989-90) and Selection
to Agreement with 5AIC re Committee certification of the
Specification No. 5-032 negotiated fee for Amendment No. 6
to Agreement with Science Applications
International Corporation (5AIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for
Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
Approving Amendment No. 6 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Agreement with 5AIC re
Specification No. 5-032 That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 89-53, approving
Amendment No. 6 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract
Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. 5-032,
extending the contract from July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990, for an amount nec
to exceed 51,609,570.00 for the fifth year of said contract. A certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part Of these minutes.
-10-
06/14/89
Authoriz1 staff to administer a Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ortion of t e Year- ve NPDE cean
Monitoring Program S ecification That staff be, and is hereby,
No. - 32-1 to include outside authorized to administer a Portion
contractual services 15pecitication of the Year Five NPDES Ocean Monitorirk
NO. -0 2- A andSpecification Program (Specification No. S-032-1),
No. - -1B previously performed by Science
Applications International Corporation,
for monthly and quarterly water quality sampling and analyses, semi-annual
benthic bioaccumulation sampling, quarterly data submittal and the
October 30th Annual Data Submission Report, for an estimated cost of
$180,120.00; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to incorporate
separate outside contractual services in an amount not to exceed
$130.300.00, as itemized below, for a total estimated, staff-administered
amount of $319,420.00, said work to be implemented pursuant to Districts'
staffing, equipment and project budgetary authorizations and procurement
regulations.
Receive file and a rove ro osal Moved, seconded and duly carried:
of Southern a form a coastal
Water Research Project re ocean That the proposal of Southern
current monitoring and modeling California Coastal Water Research
services and re oration of a Project (SCCWRP) dated April 19,
Year-Five Ocean urrents Re ort 1989, to provide ocean current
pec f cation No. b-03 -SA monitoring and modeling services
and the preparation of a Year-Five
Ocean Currents Report (Specification No. S-032-IA) for a total amount
not to exceed $90,300.00, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed
and approved.
Receive file and a rove ro osal Moved, seconded and duly carried:
of EcoAnal sIs nc. to assist
staff with data handlin an That the proposal of EcoAnalysis,
preparation of require uarter Inc. dated May 24, 1989, to assist
ODES Reports pec f cation staff with data handling and
NO. -18 preparation of required quarterly
ODES Reports (Specification
No. S-032-1B) for a total amount not to exceed $40,000.00, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive a and approve written
report of the Executive LOffFnittee That the written report of the joint
and Fiscal Policy Comnittee meeting of the Executive Committee and
the Fiscal Policy Committee held on
May 24, 1989, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Fiscal Polic
omnittee Report re 1989-90 That the Fiscal Policy Committee's
personnel requirements and joint report and recommendations re 1989-90
works budgets personnel requirements and joint works
operating and construction budgets, be,
and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
-11-
06/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving 1personnel
requirements and wen din That the 1989-90 personnel requirements
ass ca on andCompensat on be, and are hereby, approved; and,
eso u on NO. , as amended
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of
Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-55, amending Classification and
Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1989-90 personnel requirements.
A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Approving e 1989-90 Joini Join following roll call vote:
Operating Budget
AYES: Edward L. Allen, Wes Bannister, Roland E. Bigonger, A. S. "Buck" Catlin,
Jahn C. Cox, Jr., Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Dan R. Griffin,
Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, Ronald B. Hoesterey, John Kanel ,
Ursula E. Kennedy, William D. Mahoney, Tom Mays, James Neal , Carrey
J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Bob Perry, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer,
Richard T. Polls, Sally Anne Sheridan, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Wayne Silzel ,
Don E. Smith, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry
W. Wedaa, Wayne D. Wedin, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Don R. Roth. Roger R. Stanton
That the proposed 1989-90 Joint Operating Budget Funds of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1989-90 fiscal year, be,
• and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows:
Fund Total Amount
Joint Operating/Working Capital $46,581,000
Workers' Compensation Self-Insured 210,000
Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 1,373,000
Public Liability Self-Insured 321,000
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by
gA rovin the 1 a to the following roll call vote:
u ay evo v ng un u get
AYES: Edward L. Allen, Wes Bannister, Roland E. Bigonger, A. B. "Buck" Catlin,
John C. Cox, Jr. , Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Don R. Griffin,
Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, Ronald B. Hoesterey, Jahn Kanel ,
Ursula E. Kennedy, William D. Mahoney, Tom Mays, James Neal , Carrey
J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Bob Perry, Iry Pickier, Ruthelyn Plumner,
Richard T. Polis, Sally Anne Sheridan, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Wayne Silzel ,
Dan E. Smith, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry
W. Wedaa, Wayne D. Wedin, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Don R. Roth, Roger R. Stanton
That the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF Joint Works Construction) of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, be, and is
hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of $102,725,000.00.
-12-
06/14/89
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aut or z ng the isca Po icy
Committee to evaluate ro osals That the Fiscal Policy Committee be, and
Fand to lace Excess orkers' is hereby, authorized and directed to /
om ensation nsurance coverage evaluate proposals obtained by the
effective July Districts' insurance broker and to place
Excess Workers' Compensation insurance
coverage effective July 1, 1989; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said action shall be submitted to the Joint Boards for
ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 12, 1989.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amending Rules of Procedure
Resolution No. 7- 1 re That the Boards of Directors hereby
Execu ve ommittee membership adopt Resolution No. 89-56, amending •_
Rules of Procedure Resolution No. 87-51
re Executive Committee membership. A certified copy of this resolution is _
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Amendment No. 10 to
Agreement Employing General counseTThat the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 89-57, approving
Amendment No. 10 to Agreement Employing General Counsel . A certified copy of
this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
endin laasification and com en-
sation Resolution No. 7 -20, as That the Boards of Directors hereby
amended re Mana ement and adopt Resolution No. 89-66, amending
upervisory Classifications' salary Clasification and Compensation
range adjustments Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re
Management and Supervisory
Classifications' salary range adjustments, pursuant to the Districts' Management
Performance Review Program. A certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Director of
Finance to cer c aims and That the Director of Finance be, and is
forward to County Auditor for hereby, authorized to certify claims and
payment forward to the Orange County auditor for
immediate payment for expenditures
incurred after June 30, 1989, and that he declare that such certification shall
comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 87-51 pertaining to procedures for
payment of claims against the Districts until the 1989-90 budgets are adopted by
the respective Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS The Boards convened in closed session at
Convene in closed session ursuan 7:50 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
to Government ode Section 54956.9(b)(1).
Section b 1
ALL DISTRICTS At 8:03 p.m. the Boards reconvened in
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
-13-
06/14/89
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin ans an sec ca ans
re on tract No. 2-11-3 That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 89-59-2, approving
plans and specifications for North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief
Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-3, and authorizing the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting temporary and permanent
Grants of Easement from Rancho That the Boards of Directors hereby
Tomas, Inc. , formerly Apollo adopt Resolution No. 89-62, approving
Development Corporation, re and accepting Grants of Easement from
Contract No. 14-1-1A Rancho Tomas, Inc. , a California
Corporation, formerly Apollo Development
Corporation, a California Corporation, required in connection with temporary
construction and perpetual right-of-way needed relative to the Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, and
authorizing payment of $37,700.00 plus costs for said right-of-way. A certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving agreement with a ity
of Costa Mesa for ,
coo erative That the Boards of Directors hereby
pro ec re Contract No. 14-1-18 adopt Resolution No. 89-64, approving
agreement with the City of Costa Mesa
for a cooperative project to include City street improvements to Baker Street,
between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, in the District's contract for
construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview
Road, Contract No. 14-1-18, and providing for reimbursement to the District by
City for their share of the costs of said joint project. A certified copy of
this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate a Professional That the Selection Committee be, and is
Services Agreement with Church hereby, authorized to negotiate a
Engineering, Inc. re design of Professional Services Agreement with
Contract No. 7-13 Church Engineering, Inc. for design of
the Campus Relief Sewer, between
Jamboree Boulevard and Van Karman Avenue, Contract No. 7-13.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
`.r DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
-14-
O6/14/89
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
d ournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then , /
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:04 p.m. , June 14, 1989. `..�
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive le and approve
Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee That the Supplemental Sewer Service Use
Report for Fiscal Year 1 Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90,
dated June 1, 1989, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICT 1 -
Public Hearing re proposed
Ordinance No. 112
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
open at 8:05 p.m.
Close Hearing There being no public oral comments,
the Chairman declared the hearing
closed at 8:05 p.m.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
rdinance No. 112 That proposed Ordinance No. 112, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and
is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 112 by title only.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting Ordinance No. 112 following roll call vote:
AYES: Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset, Ronald B. Hoesterey
NOES: None
ABSENT: Roger R. Stanton
That Ordinance No. 112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Ordinance No. 111, be, and is hereby,
adopted.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: _
Directing the County Auditor-
Controller to include sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby
charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-58-1, directing
the County Auditor-Controller to include
sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 112 of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90
fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
-15-
06/14/89
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
AdJournmen
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:06 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
Contract No. 5-31 specifications for Replacement of
Portions of Coast Highway Force Main,
Contract No. 5-31, authorizing an addition of $163,677.00 to the contract with
Christeve Corporation for additional work due to undisclosed utilities;
installation of three additional pressure access tees and manholes; removal of
contaminated soil ; change in grade for new 36" line to accommodate utility lines;
additional asphalt paving and backfill due to undisclosed 27-inch force main; and
payment of bonus for early completion of contract, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Contract No. 5-31
as complete . That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 89-60, accepting
Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, as
complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final
Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve
Supplemental Sewer Service Use Fee That the Supplementai, Sewer Service Use
Report for Fiscal Year 1959-90 Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90,
dated May 31, 1989, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICT 5
Public Hearing re proposed
Ordinance No. 519
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
open at 8:07 p.m.
Close Hearing There being no public oral comments,
the Chairman declared the hearing
closed at 8:07 p.m.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 519 That proposed Ordinance No. 519, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and
is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 519 by title only.
-16-
06/14/89
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
A op ing Ordinance No. 519 following roll call vote:
AYES: John C. Cox, Jr. , Chairman, Evelyn Hart /
NOES: None
ABSENT: Don -R. Roth
That Ordinance No. 519, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried;
Directing the County Auditor-
controller to include sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby
charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-61-5, directing
the County Auditor-Controller to include
sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 519 of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90
fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:08 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and a prove
u lementa ewer Service Use Fee That the Supplemental Sewer Service Use
Report or kiscal Year 1989- 0 Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90,
dated May 31, 1989, .be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICT 6
Public Hearing re proposed
Ordinance No. 613
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
open at 8:08 p.m.
Close Hearing There being no public oral comments,
the Chairman declared the hearing
closed at 8:08 p.m.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
rdinance No. 613 That proposed Ordinance No. 613. An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance
No. 612, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, ands/
is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 613 by title only.
-17-
O6/14/89
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting Ordinance No. 613 following roll call vote:
AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Ruthelyn Plummer
NOES: None
ABSENT: Don R. Roth
That Ordinance No. 613, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance
No. 612, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Directingthe our u itor-
on ro ler to include sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby
charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-63-6, directing
the County Auditor-Controller to include
sewer service charges an the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance No. 613 of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, commencing with the 1989-90
fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
,Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:10 p.m., June 14, 1989.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive file and a rove
Su lementa Sewer Service Use Fee That the Supplemental Sewer Service Use
,
port for Fiscal Year 1989-90 Fee Report for Fiscal Year 1989-90,
dated June 7, 1989, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICT 11
Public Hearin re proposed
OrdinanceNa. 1
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
open at 8:11 p.m.
Close Hearing There being no public oral comments,
the Chairman declared the hearing
closed at 8:11 p.m.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Readin of Proposed
Ordinance No. 1 09 That proposed Ordinance No. 1109, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. it of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and
Is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1109 by title only.
-18-
06/14/89
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting rtl nance No. 1109 following roll call vote:
AYES: Tom Mays, Chairman, Grace Winchell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Roger R. Stanton
That Ordinance No. 1109, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and is hereby, adapted.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Directinq the County Auditor-
Controller to include sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby
charges on property tax bills adopts Resolution No. 89-65-11,
directing the County Auditor-Controller
to include sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinance
No. 1109 of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, commencing with
the 1989-90 fiscal year. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto
and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m. , June 14, 1989.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change rder No. 5 to the
lans and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and
contract No. - R-1 specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk
Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at
Various Locations, Contract No. 3-2BR-(,. authorizing an addition of $72,500.00 to
the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company for payment of bonus for
early completion of specified manholes and rehabilitation of one additional
manhole; and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of said
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -
DISTRICT 3 The Chairman declared a recess at
Recess 8:12 p.m.
DISTRICT 3 The Chairman reconvened the meeting at
Reconvene 8:25 p.m.
DISTRICT 3 Richard Marsh, Special Counsel to the
Actions re a eal of Beatrice/Hunt- Board, briefly reviewed the proceedings for
Wesson, Inc. re Industrial Waste conducting the hearing on the appeal of
Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143 Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. relative to °
Industrial Waste Discharge Permit
No. 3-1-143. The hearing procedures are governed by the District's Ordinance _
Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, as well as the
Rules on Appeal adopted by the Board of Directors on April 12, 1989.
Mr. Marsh stated that the hearing was being conducted based on written statements
and declarations from both parties. He advised that these declarations, togethe,
with oral testimoney, constitute the record upon which the Board should case its /
decision. The issue before the Board was whether or not they should grant the
appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson or deny the appeal and reaffirm staff's decision
relative to pe rnit limits.
-19-
O6/14/89
Open hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
open at 8:28 p.m.
Staff presentation The Districts' Director of Technical
Services gave a brief presentation on
the Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson operation and wastewater discharge. For the
Directors' information, he also gave a brief orientation on the Districts'
treatment process, defining some of the terminology used in the statements
submitted to Directors as measures of treatment effectiveness and effluent
quality. One term commonly used is "Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)" which
is a laboratory test which measures the wastewater's potential effect upon
the oxygen levels of a receiving water.
Mr. Anderson added that the Districts are operating under permits from the
Environmental Protection Agency and the State of California. The BOO
requirements of these permits are becoming increasingly stringent, and the
Districts must constantly remain below permit limits. Currently, on an
average, the Districts' influent contains 500,000 lbs. per day of BOD, and
after treatment the BOD in the effluent must be reduced to no more than
180,000 lbs. per day.
He pointed out that the treatment plants treat an average of 260 million
gallons per day of wastewater. The Districts' 30-year Facilities Master
Plan indicates a need for an expanded capacity to 399 mgd by 2020.
Mr. Anderson reiterated that it is the Districts' intention to remain in
compliance constantly with regulations imposed by EPA and the State of
California.
In order to accomplish this goal , it is important to strictly enforce the
Districts' source control program. This will help prevent the pass-throdgh
of untreated BOD to the ocean and protect the secondary treatment process.
The bacterial culture used in the secondary treatment process must be stable
and maintained under optimum conditions to provide proper treatment. If
there is a major change in the sewage content, the treatment process is
affected.
The Director of Technical Services also showed the Directors an aerial video
of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson's site and facilities in Fullerton pointing out the
areas where various stages of the canning process take place and open space
areas available for future facilities.
Receive and file A eal of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Beatrice Hun -Wesson, Inc.
That the Appeal of
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. dated March 22, 1989, re Industrial Waste
Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file Itemization of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Items of Evidence submitted on
behalf of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. That the Itemization of Items of
Evidence dated May 22, 1989, submitted
on behalf of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit
No. 3-1-143, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
-20-
06/14/89
Receive and file Statement of Facts Moved, seconded and duly carried:
and Memorandum of Po nts an
Authorities in Support of Appeal That the Statement of Facts and
Memorandum of Points and Authorities , /
in Support of Appeal , dated May 23, 1989, re Industrial Waste Discharge
Permit No. 3-1-143, including:
- Declaration of James N. Williams
- Declaration of Robert C. Thomas
- Declaration of John Baird
be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file Statement of Facts Moved, seconded and duly carried:
and Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Opposition o opeal That the Statement of Facts and
Memorandum of Points and Authorities
in Opposition to Appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. , dated June 2, 1989,
re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143, be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed.
Receive and file Itemization of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Items of Evidence submitted on
behalf of the District That the Itemization of Items of
Evidence dated June 2, 1989, submitted
on behalf of the District, re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 3-1-143,
including:
- Declaration of Richard W. von Langan
- Declaration of Stephen C. Hough
- Declaration of David Jenkins
- Declaration of Kelly Christensen
- Declaration of Blake Anderson
be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
Oral resentation b The Chair recognized Mr. Joel
Beatrice Hunt-Wesson, Inc. Moskowitz, of the law firm of Gibson,
Dunn 8 Crutcher, representing
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. Mr. Moskowitz questioned the authority and
propriety of the District's staff imposing a BOD limitation and requiring
pretreatment of their industrial discharge and a reduction of BOD from their
cannery. He contended that the canning facility in question had not grown,
although he admitted there were seasonal variations, and did not feel it was
fair to reduce their BOD limits three months prior to canning season. He
also contended that the reason for the restrictions placed upon Beatrice was
to accommodate the growth of Orange County.
Mr. Moskowitz then cross examined the Districts' declarants Rich von Langan,
Kelly Christensen, Stephen Hough, Blake Anderson and David Jenkins. Thomas _
L. Woodruff, General Counsel for the staff, also responded to Mr. Moskowitz'
cross examination.
In closing, Attorney Moskowitz expressed Beatrice's concerns regarding the
necessary investment to build a pretreatment facility on their site. He
felt that there was not sufficient time to obtain the necessary approvals.
He also felt that the surrounding residential areas would object to this
-21-
06/14/89
type of facility. Mr. Moskowitz contended that the District already had
treatment facilities and Beatrice should not be required to build such
facilities. He reiterated that their plant size had not increased and
Beatrice did not feel they should have to shoulder the burden he alleged was
caused by the growth in Orange County.
He also objected to the possibility that Beatrice may have to cut back their
production in order to meet the Districts' restrictions during this canning
season.
District's oral res on$e to Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
ea r ce un -Wesson's a eal reviewed a prepared summary of remarks
y ueneral Counsel and responses which were itemized for
Directors and displayed via an
overhead projector for them to follow. He advised that negotiations with
Beatrice regarding possible future limitations on their discharge began as
early as 1985 and referred to a letter included in the declarations
submitted by the District which advised Beatrice of this. He commented that
the Directors had been unfairly disparaged recently by a lot of
misinformation that had been mailed to them by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson
interests.
In response to Beatrice's contention that it was unfair to ask them to build
pretreatment facilities, he noted that 356 other industries have spent from
$25,000 to $5 million to build such facilities In order to comply with
environmental requirements.
With regard to the question posed by Beatrice relative to the legal basis by
which the District has the right to impose said limitations, Mr. Woodruff
responded as follows:
- The Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Clean Water Act")
mandated the development by the U.S. EPA of a National
Pretreatment Program designed to prevent the discharge to
POTW's of pollutants which interfere with, ass throw h or
are otherwise incompatible with the treatment facilities.
[Clean Water Act, Section 307(b)(c)]
- The U.S. EPA has adopted a comprehensive national program
regulating dischargers and establishing pretreatment
standards and requirements for industrial users and
mandating local POTW's to implement this program by adoption
of their own pretreatment programs. [Title 40, Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 403]
- The Federal Pretreatment Regulations prohibit any user from
introducing into any POTW any pollutant, including BOD,
which passes through or causes Interference with POTW' s
treatment processes or operations. [Title 40, Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 4033.5(b)(4)]
- Both state and local law authorize the Districts to regulate
Beatrice' s BOD discharge into the sewer system. [California
Government Code Section 54739; Districts' Ordinance No. 306,
Sections 201, 208(B)(4) and 302.1(c)]
-22-
06/14/89
- The Districts complied with applicable federal , state and
local regulations in developing the BOO discharge limitation
policy. [Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 403.1 at seq. ; California Government Code
Section 54739; District's Ordinance No. 306, Sections 201
and 208(B) (4)]
- Locally established limits imposed upon individual
industrial users should be preventative rather than
reactive.
- The Districts have followed the express published guidelines
of EPA for pretreatment regulation and implementation, by
considering all relevant treatment plant and environmental
information, together with sound engineering and scientific
data, in establishing the Districts' BOO discharge limits.
[EPA Guidance Manual on Development and Implementation of
Local Discharge Limitations Under the Pretreatment Program
(December 1987) , Section 1.3.2]
- District's Ordinance No. 306 authorizes the District's staff
to impose pretreatment and discharge limitation conditions
on industrial users. [District' s Ordinance No. 306,
Sections 302.1 and 302.2] Mr. Woodruff quoted portions of
those sections of the Ordinance, as follows:
11302.1 Class I Permit Application:
A. ......
B. .
C. Other Information may be required to properly
evaluate the permit application. After
evaluation and acceptance of the data
furnished, the District may issue a Class I
wastewater discharge permit, subject to terms
and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and
as otherwise determined by the Chief Engineer
to be necessary to protect the District's
system."
11302.2 Class I Permit Conditions, Limitations and
Stipulations that may be in Permit:
A. Mass emission rates regulating incompatible
pollutants;
B. ......
C. ......
D. ......
E. ......
F. ......
G. ..
H. ......
I.
J. Other provisions which may be applicable to
ensure compliance with all provisions of this
Ordinance;
K. Other terms and conditions determined by the
Chief Engineer to be necessary to protect the
District's system."
-23-
06/14/89
Mr. Woodruff emphasized that based on the above, it is simply not true that
the District does not have authority to impose limits on Beatrice just
because the classification relative to industries discharging over
10,000 lbs. of BOO was not specifically listed in the District's Ordinance.
To date there have only been two other industries in this category--Anaheim
Citrus Products (ACP) and Integrated Protein Technology (IPT). They have
both built pretreatment facilities and modified their procedures to meet the
same discharge standards imposed upon Beatrice.
He noted that the Districts' past experience establishes that excessive BOO
discharges seriously threaten the Districts' wastewater treatment plants as
they pass through and interfere with the operation of the plants and,
therefore, jeopardize th�>:ri_cTs' 301(h) waiver in its NPDES Permit, as
stated in the declarations of David Jenkins and Richard von Langan.
Mr. Woodruff added that Beatrice has the ability to implement procedures to
significantly reduce BOD discharges even without construction of a
pretreatment facility. He referred to declarations of Kelly Christensen and
Richard van Langan which detail some possible procedures.
Declarations of David Jenkins and Richard von Langen indicate that Beatrice
will be able to efficiently operate a pretreatment facility on a seasonal
basis. In peak season, Beatrice's BOD is twice the amount generated by the
total population of the City of Fullerton. Also, in peak season, Beatrice's
discharge of BOD increased approximately 18% between 1984 and 1987. He
reiterated that without the District's BOD limitations, in peak season,
Beatrice and other high volume BOD dischargers would cause violations of the
Districts' NPDES Permit limits.
The General Counsel noted that the Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson facility in
Fullerton was not, in fact, in the middle of a residential development, as
Beatrice had alleged. There are residences on the eastern boundary, with an
airport on the western boundary, and the Hughes factory to the north. The
area is basically an industrial park with many industries and a refinery.
Mr. Woodruff agreed that Orange County is fast growing and stated that it is
the Districts' responsibility to provide treatment facilities for all areas
and the new growth. They must, at the same time, comply with all
regulations placed on them by federal and state regulatory agencies. The
philosophy of the Districts is to protect the land, air and water. Since
1974 the Districts have spent over $300 million, and over the next 10 years
they will spend $1 billion to expand and improve the Districts' treatment
facilities. Without enforcement of the Districts' BOD policy, the Districts
would be required to expend an additional $22 million in capital costs for
construction of treatment facilities merely to treat Beatrice's BOD
discharges, as indicated in the declaration of Stephen Hough.
The General Counsel added that the District's action to issue a permit with
conditions to protect the environment does not constitute a "project"; but
even if it were, the action is exempt from compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") , pursuant to California Code Regulations,
Title 14, Sections 15307, 15308 and 15321.
He advised Directors that the District's Ordinance No. 306 and the
Districts' 1985 NPDES Permit, bath of which are part of the record, were
available for further review.
Close hearing The Chairman declared the hearing
closed at 11:20 p.m.
-P4-
06/14/89
Discussion by Directors The Board of Directors then entered
into a lengthy discussion. They
asked whether the requirements placed on Beatrice were consistent with other
dischargers of their volume and were informed that the 10,000 lb. per day
BOD limitation would apply District-wide.
Board members inquired about the $4 million estimate for Beatrice to
construct pretreatment facilities. Staff reiterated that if Beatrice did
not limit their BOD, the District would have to build treatment plant
facilities to provide for an additional 15 mgd capacity which has an
estimated capital cost to the District of $22 million.
Directors reviewed the possible alternative procedures available to Beatrice
during the peak period when they would exceed their BOO limitation. Staff
noted that they had offered to allow Beatrice to truck their excess
wastewater directly to the Districts for disposal but thus far have had no
response to that.offer.
The Board also discussed possible legal actions available to the District in
order to stop the excess BOO discharge from the Beatrice facility.
It was pointed out by Dr. Jenkins that Beatrice could operate a
substantially odor-free anaerobic pretreatment facility, based on his
observations of other similar operations. The amount of land needed for
this system would depend upon the design but based on information available
to the District, staff estimated .7 acres would be needed.
Directors noted that the Districts' industrial wastewater treatment program
began in 1976, with pretreatment facilities being required beginning in
1978. Industries in Orange County were involved in the preliminary
workshops prior to adoption of Ordinances in 1976, 1983 and the new
ordinance to be introduced at the next regular Board meeting. Staff pointed
out that the industrial sector and an ad hoc committee had participated with
staff in determining the limitations on metals, pollutants, etc. Mr. Baird
of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson participated in the last revision of the proposed
new ordinance also.
The Board questioned whether a pretreatment facility at the Beatrice site
would require City of Fullerton permits or CEQA approval . The District's
General Counsel indicated that they would be subject to the City's land use
requirements but did not know if additional permits would be required. The
project would also be subject to CEQA guidelines, requiring preparation of a
negative declaration or an EIR, as appropriate.
Directors expressed concern that a large industry like Beatrice would not
take measures to meet environmental standards and the District's
requirements in order to avoid adverse impacts on the treatment process of
all of the Districts and, ultimately, on the ocean. They observed that a
large industry such as Beatrice should take the responsibility and '
leadership in such a program.
It was pointed out by Directors that the Districts have a mandate, as well
as an obligation, to protect the environment and to comply with federal and
state standards.
The Board discussed the issue of equitability of the allocation of costs to
all users for the treatment of wastewater by the Districts' facilities, as
well as the requirement for industry to build pretreatment facilities.
Staff stated that the Districts are concerned with these issues also and
felt that the Ordinance provided equitability.
-25-
O6/14/89
Denial of appeal of Beatrice/Hunt- A motion was made, seconded and, after
Wesson Inc. re Industrial Waste discussion, amended, as follows:
D scharge Permit No. -1-14
That the Board of Directors of County
�...� Sanitation District No. 3 hereby finds that:
- On February 15, 1989, the District issued Permit No. 3-1-143
("Permit") to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ("Beatrice").
- This Permit contains limits on the discharge of Biochemical Oxygen
Demand (BOD) as set forth herein.
- The BOO limits are in accord with previously developed discharge
limits applicable to industrial dischargers of disproportionately
large amounts of BOO.
- The BOD limits set forth in the Permit are necessary in order to meet
NPDES Permit requirements and prevent pass-through or interference
with the treatment processes of Plant No. 2.
- The methodology of restricting the introduction of BOD into Plant
No. 2 as evidenced by the Permit is consistent with the guidelines
promulgated by EPA.
- The Permit was validly issued under the laws of the State of
California and the District's Regulations for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities.
- The issuance of the permit is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act because (a) The issuance of this
permit is not a project or (b) If the issuance of the permit is
determined to be a project, it is categorically exempt under 14
California Code of Regulations Sections 15307; 15308 and 15321.
- The classification which distinguishes Beatrice and other
high-strength BOD dischargers from other users of the Districts'
sewerage system is reasonable.
- There are feasible methods by which Beatrice can obtain the BOD levels
set forth in the Permit.
- These methods can be implemented for costs which are reasonable in
light of all the circumstances prevailing.
and, therefore, does hereby deny the appeal of Beatric/Hunt-Wesson, Inc.
dated May 22, 1989; does ratify the action taken by the District staff in
issuing Permit No. 3-1-143; and does confirm all the provisions thereof.
The Directors commented further on the Districts' legal and environmental
responsibilities and obligations, as well as the equitability of the costs
associated with treatment of wastewater.
Following a call for the question, a roll call vote was taken on the motion
to deny the appeal of Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. The Secretary reported
that the motion had carried.
-26-
06/14/89
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 11:55 p.m., June 14, 1989.
Secretary, Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-27-
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04/85 PAGE I
._. REPORT NUMBER AP43 _
rnm .eun IT1n1 .1.1RICIA OF M..AL_000NEg
CLAIMS PAID 05/10/89 POSTING DATE 05/14/69
_.__YARRAN C-NO�_--_._. - YE N00R—__- •II0D11• -.—.____.__ _._._ ._.--0ES CR1P.7 rnu ._
0q.451 A.M. BEST COMPANY 590.13 PUBLICATION
"2----A DL7-ING-CN6LMC ENS Si 0f—_——__-_---TRIN88RFNG-SRRVIC85-0IST-S— --
099453 ACHE MELDING 015. TRAILER REPAIR
19.954 AOVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. f1.391,678.97
CONSTRUCTION ]-IS
099456--AIERICAN 3NFUTERL— $27.8n __.. _- _ __OFFICE SMOTM
UPPLI --.--_
099457 AMERICAN COMPUTER SUPPLY S557.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES
099457 AM E0.ICAN MEDIA. INC. f55 T•95 VIDEO Ir
9459---ANAMELAN-TECNNIGSTRUCTIO �4.366.32
099460 THE
ANC SEVER CONSTRUCTION $9.$40.04 MECHANICAL
REPRISE DIRT 7
099g64 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 3q0.➢q MIFFIG WL PARTS
"i---ARATEX SERTENS-- SS 543- B6 -._....__—UOIFOR6-FAD6 n'
099463 FALTER SERVICES. INC. ,341.22 MITOREM I'
099963 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE s99.... 22 WIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88Ogg,
0"164---BRNSRACHo INC, ^LY ---- INSTRUMENT
NST UMEOPPLIE•
099466 9ACH ABAR07 INC. f221.00 CONSTRUCTION
REPAIRNSERV4 �a
- 099966 P.W. RIES-T7 AND ASSOC. $6_... I0 CONSTHVCTIOM SERVICES PI-25626.P2-32.99.94.37
X-C9946-T-------BATIERI SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS
,781.9E __ _.__._-_—LAVE• PARTS
D99469 BEATER SCIENTIFIC PROOUC TS $3$246.85 LAB SUPPLIES
2 499469 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES. INC. f196•B5 CAR WASH TICKETS
99471 MARERT BEIBN-VAFFRPROROST •• !.,a 7RG
5 G SERVICE b:
099472 ROISET CASCADE
LLIAM OFFICE
FROST f AS $
$1.641.32 ENGOFFICE
IERVIGE$ 88-I44-5.99-16
099472 RGISE CASCADE OFi ICE PRODUCTS f1.641.32 OPPICB ARTS
- 099475 BOYLERENN R-FIEDLER 4 CORE f64$386.64 INSTRUMENT
SUPPLIES
RES 88-103
09"75 BRENNER-FIEOLEP 6 ASSOC., INC. f396.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLI69
. - 1---09M i6 DA-I4iHNEE{i:E[-SA-7 -- -- ---BLRQRi6-MtTBR I�,
099477 RROVN S CALDWELL $220.00 LAB SERVICES Ic'
899478 BROWN C CALOWELL CONSULTING $27.516.56 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-37
o
------0999T9---------9TEYE ENGINEECONS TRUCTfON�Or --SiB5Y$4TMR------------ ---GOECTRUCFHPPLIER
099461 PUPNE G.
ENGINEERING CO. f44.64 08CTRIC HREIIBU
099461 GA P.Y 6. STR EEO f460.06 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
--b994Gl --f6-k-S ECBNDITIONINs5ve so ---------MBTRRiARFG --- -
099463 CS COMPANY f3.042.11 VALVE
r C99484 CSI-CALTROL $4,503.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS'
---- -099486--- --CAL-BALSA-FOR-RES EAROM r-ONC-E- ----N9.05 CHEMICALSFB� "'
- 099487 CAL-FAO CHEMICAL NEE CO.. INC, 466.05 ENGINEERS
0...E7 CARLETOR ENGINEERS f4.466.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES
099489 CAHN-GARERLB-ENGINEERS-- —'LP91.45M9---- TRUCK PUTS-6ERV0W6-J-I3.Pi-20 -
;,, 095496 CASE ROVER f E6DIPME NT 31.938.39 TRUCK PARSE R�
099494 CENTURY SAFETY INST. f SUMP. S11B.08 SAFETY SWPLISS iu
`. -C 99491--_ . " GMAM PION-FENC['C0•--.----_.-----.._--327iMr04—_-.
099492 CHEM SERVICE $432.10 LAS SUPPLIES p(
099493 CHEMVEST INDUSTRIES, INC. fBC.574.40 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-09-88 M=.
---- 099 M4 CMESSEw CORP.-- .— i:Bs:B --
099495 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $23.595.30 OIL 6 GREASE
099496 OHRISTEVE CORP. f804.152.T5 CONSTRUCTION 5-31
FUND NO 91?^ - JT CIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/69/B9 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT o5 F ORANGE Coux T1'_..
CLAIMS PAID 05/10/89 POSTING DATE O5/10/89
ARRANT NyiyEM00� AMOUNT _ _ O[SCRIPTION
P99497 WILLIAM N. CLARKE $96.00 MEETING MUSE
_ 09949e CQ@(NNE,CJ.693 oy 3123.85 MIE11CM MUSE
099199 COAST INSUR LACE AGENCY 3323,400.00 INSURANCE M.O. 1-12-89 ".
095500 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF. CALIF 32,OSO.OQ ALUMINUM PLATING
099501 CONNELL._GA.N._PARIX_"IV. 51 B3.61___._. ---TRUCK PARTS
999502 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CIST. $2,632.01 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
099563 CONSOLIDATED FREIGhTWAYS $911.99 mim
099504 COOP A__ME0..Y_SERVICFS 91.594.41 _ MECBANCIAL SUPPLIES ��..
' 099505 COUNT WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 32,269.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES -
099506 CRANE VETOR COPP. S02.83 WILDING MATERIALS
_._R99517 _ _SMARLES_P-_CROWLE]L_ 0. __ 356.76 _ PAIR PARTS
099500 CAL WATER S165.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
099509 CYBEPES S2,250.0C SERVICE AGREEMENT
n 99v10 O.Q`EN.6LHEERIMG i190.Oj_ TRUCK REPAIRS
099511 ONE. INC. 3273.30 HARDWARE
099512 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 25.580.01 TINES
FM—602513 ___.._70N..DAVF3.--- _.___ $f OB.50 , __.. ___Mg871NC a%PW3H
C99514 DECO $676.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
2 099515 DE2URTK AND/OP. CS CO. $2,812.94 VALVE PARTS
022216 _fIl3.TFC_POLY_MtRS__ $2,645,94 _ANIPEISEYQ=M M.O.B-10-RD
-� 099517 DICKSOMS 49B.55 ELECTRIC PARTS
-4 099518 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $3,943.22 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIR
++1——ouxx.EOW3aos.Dnae. SL7R.2�,_ PAM.SUPPLTES Iv
n 099520 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. $499.79 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT
N 099521 EFE TECHNOL06TES $1,879.13 RBFUW USER PEE OVERPAYHOUT
...g11 F^e Y MANR-1NC__ a.1A-.p QFPILE SUPPLIES lo-
099523 W. M. EBERT CORP. $100.711.47 CONSTRUCTION 2-27
099524 ECOSYSTEMS ENG.A ANALYSIS f13260.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
VISUAL.-IMAGE01 -_. •R•+l2...SA_.—.__-__-.___ .ACTIQN PLAN NUDES _ «
099526 EDVAFD L. ELLIOT. JR. 9752.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES wn�
099527 EMERY L PUROLATOR $35.00 FREIGHT
___ENCHAMTEB._lNC._ ........ OLEANOGMPNTC RESFARCJ! M.D.f-IGF97 _ Mi
049529 EVERECT EQUIPMENT f7.618.18 MISCUE
099530 FACTORY REPRESENTATIVE, INC. f6B6.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS .,{
_ ---099531--.--.JOHN_N.-GALKEMSTCIN�C- 'S.S70 OO --. __CONSTRUCTION 9F VTCAP J_-7d._110-_ -
` 999532 FARR SALES 3 SERVICE 3220.11 FILTER
99533 FAST TRACK. INC. $69.00 CONFUTER SOFTWARE pe.
099535 -FEDERALES3RESS-.CWP •$9.56 __ ATR PPEICPT
099536 FILTER GAS ( 37.50 PWHANI
099536 FILTER SUPPLY CO. f1r33 7.S0 MECHANICAL PARTS
__-09933T____.__.. SUPER
O.SYS TEMP... •51..16..__________._-PUMEPARTR
099539 FOUNTAIN
PUMPS. INC. "$203.01 PUMP PARTS
` 099539 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 3203.J1 PAINT SUPPLIES
__ 9-5A0 __GENGAIERAL I ELECLASSTRIC CO.SIn� ER3 ay6u_.^ _ __.. ENGINEERING
YTCES
SERVICES
_
099511 GENERAL ELECTRIC C $5.650.00 WNSTRUCIIO SERVICES J-IS y`L
` 099512 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION f18V.267.39 CONSTRUCTION 1-13A
x� nq
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04199 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
—_ _.—_—_.__..----LG➢LAIMS PAID 05/1RISER-IGIS-ING DATEC-LOYILIT__
CLAIMS PAID OS/IO/e9 POSTING DATE .^5/10/69
-- AMOUNT - __..._._... - _➢ESCRSPSlOu
099543 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,263.04 TELEPHONE
0G95•• 6E.ORGL-LEECN_L-ASS CCI•TLS fl 39-•• eLICCTRIC-cARTs
399545 GIERLICH-NITCHCLL. INC. 819.209.30 MECHANICAL PARTS
099596 GOLDEN COAST BIOMASS ENERGY CO $368.41 SAWDUST
--OGGS97 T.NONAS_IRAV- S-ASSOC.,INC .--iR58.00-- - -- —SAP TSSTIM
099590 GREAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. 5110.98 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
099549 DON GREEK L ASSOCIATES $6,293.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES RU88-I41-2
_.�53556—.--_6RiNNELIrCORRORAUOu ... ..
099551 MALFRIN SUPPLY CO. 590.83 FITTINGS 0'
099552 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $9.241.33 PUMP PARTS
---09955]- ----- HATCH S-KIAM.-IMC.-- - --ti9611.1b-- -- - ---- ----MECHANICAL-PART6 --
099559 HEWLETT PACKARD $517.24 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
099555 MILTI, INC. S88.78 PUMP PARTS
"SSG--a100080N-ELE CiRiC— 92.801 AO -- 6LEGTAEGA4688Vi68E itr
u.
099557 HOERSIGER C.Y.S. CALIF. • INC. 11.899.O0 MEACHANICAL PUTS in
099558 HOSE DOCTOR 5151.90 PUMP PUTS
-.FS1-099559-- -- -- --HOUSE-OF. BATTERIES—
X 09-560 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. 3388.50 HARDWARE
= 099561 HUGHES MICROELECTRONIC 5999.99 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
___Gli-Y-OF-HUN11N6i0N-BE AGM FN�659�2b—.—_... - --YAS'eR-U6EA68
099563 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY 5127.2C H Alue
Ao� 099564 IMD DELAYAL INC. $1.608.58 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
:D 099866----T8"-COMPANF-- —SN�696.i9—._-------_IxSmUMe•" :a
C99566 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,291.69 FITTINGS
W 099567 INGRAM PAPER $256.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES
,993,,---iRY-FNE-R AN6IF YAiEF-6}9iR:vT Li4 66 --------- NAT6 S &es I•
099569 RIVIERA FINANCE $676.82 JUITORIAL SUPPLIES
099570 MAMAN BEARINGS S SUPPLY 886.99 FITTINGS
•,-----099591--------'KAkER-COMPANY ----- --$1 16---- TOOLS
-, 399572 KEENAN SUPPLY $570.49 VALVE
0995" THE KEITH COMPANIES 89.918.9G ENGINEERING SERVICES BEG 88-65-3
-- .99591---- KIEVIF-PACIF-1Ci-0 iT5SBi'lYBr39-- ----nON6TRUC9f0N3BRtlClEB-Pt-YO;PI-Ii—'-
099575 KING BEARING. INC. $13,339.45 MACHINE SUPPLIES
099576 KIRST PUMP R MACHINE WORKS $1.055.00 PUMP PARTS
MARTIN-KORDICK.-SP--- 3evBEYv26-- --'-'-- --'-00NSTRUCTLO"ERVICE"-29s5-31--
099570 L.A. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $1.367.52 PUMP PARTS
099579 L.B.Y.S.. INC. $21.B9 NET SUPPLIES W'
kAGE"UPpLie"_SEMYSOE-- ----G5E9 94----- ----PRIWt9UPPLt85 -- b_
0.99501 ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE $340.80 PUBLICATIONS F.
099502 LEARN - PC VIDFO SYSTEMS ' 5703.5C COMPUTER VIDEO
o.
- --M99583---- - LIf ECOM-SAFETY CYLINDER REPA[R9---- - ----- ----- -
0995b9 LIMITOPDUC CORP. 51076.35 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
399585 N.F. LINDSTROM. INC. 510.359.40 CONSULTING SERVICES-MASTER PLAN
•:
��-- 099566---'-NBC-APPLICB-EMVIR ONNEM7A 16./0---- - - ' --OCGN MONITORING-- ---------�'
099507 MPS $52.37 PHOTO SERVICES x'
09958E PACONC0 $109.80 MAINTeN:1NCE CONTRACT
FUND NO 9199 JT DIST MOANING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5104/89 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION OILTRICTS OF OPAl1aEL_COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 55/10/89 POSTING DATE 05/10/89
_VENDOR-__.... _-_____AMOUNT
099589 MALCOLM PIRNIE . INC. 3106.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES - MASTER PLAN �.
099590 _NIRSMALL MAIM]__9P000CTION3 3283.OP - SAFm VIDEOS
099591 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S31.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES F•
099592 MASTER TOOLS SERVICES 3512.84 TOOL REPAIR p
-2952L____aII_S�NLOf,T_3NE.__ $1,753.67 CNIQINATION PARTS
099594 MCKENNA ENGR. R EQUIP. $I6.198.P7 PUMP FARTS
099595 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP S572.27 THUM PARTS
099596 _ PEOLI_N CONRQLaS CO. 3380.49 _._yOUC¢ �'•
099597 MILLIPORE AND/UA HATERS $1.166.05 LAB EQUIPMENT
-"' 099598 MLADEN SUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO $355,595.99 CONSTRUCTION 3-34R
099599 _-NQMIT4K.JYC. _ $328.52 __ _ OTPICB REPAIRS I+-
-' 099600 MONITD2 PUBLISHING CO. $300.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS c
C99601 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES f2.865.00 LAB SERVICES N
I ON..INGumitS.A INC. $337.61 RDBIRR PPOMIPI'S �'
099683 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES S73.63 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES TI
099604 NATIONAL ELECTRIC TEST. ASSOC. S131.J0 PUBLICATION
BTS-099605___. __.-_NATIONAL FILM -AEOIA-CORR• _ AA•125.13___.__,_ x,C....CAI. --
"S 09960E NEAL SUPPLY CO. S360.86 HARDHARE
_ 099607 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $21.74 WATER USEAGE n•
_W (a9RD8___yDRIMHE$3_S.QIIR-.YELDINEt. IMC_ SP19.Qu _____ _ MRfNANfIAI P1PTS
099689 O.M.S. 31.560.06 TRASH BINS
099610 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 6194.29 SAPEIY GLASSES
: IEPICE-el l 10MAIYLvelne ovu- a t>._yl__ __.Ovvic¢ mmxlnmv ___
M 099612 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDES 369.00 SURCRIPTION
r 099613 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. 339.601.28 CHLORINE M.O. 10-12-88 m:
,Alk -ORAN-F COAST-ELE11211 anooM . S.c9-u -ELCTRIC RTT"TTRR
099615 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 3164.75 TRUCK PARTS
099616 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $38.16 CHEOICALS
u:
-- 99617- __.__._.. __ORANGE-WLVE-L_E3 T71YG
0
' 9961 OXYGEN C 39I2.91 SPECIALTY GASSES p.
a 099619 OF ORANGE
COUNTY OF ORANGE ...982.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES
t. 9621 rnCIIIIC AJILTDATA
SYSTEMS
So.>ce-t8 REINBIERF OFTWARE cnw Txcneeufv _ I•'
099622 PACIFIC DS Td CON SY STE XS $115.68 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
099622 PACO PUMPS 31 NO3.65 PUMP PARTS
= ---099623----PACIFIC SAL ET.T-EOYIRMEM310- t3.6�.83- - ETY_SPPLTuc
09962♦ PACIFIC BELL 513.3ETGONE o-a
099625 PAN WEST 3321.31 TELEPHONE
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES I^�
^ 96^6 PARTS ENGTDUCLIUNS - .
w� 099628 PARTS EN67MED CO. COMPANY $361.72 MECHANICAL PARTS
MENT
' 099628 PHOTO L SOUND CO. f361.72 ORRICE EQUIPMENT
99629.-.__.._ _ _RICKWICR-PAPER -- _ +AS.SL---- -- TAW ImvT: almm T,,
099630 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $191.15 PLASTIC BOTTLES
099631 POLYPURE. INC. 513.961.67 CATIONIC POLYMERS M.0.3-8-89
^61^ _.pOMM-CLECTROSUPPL.
099633 POWER MACHINE CO. S318.00 MP SOMECHANCIAL PARTS w
C99630 POWER-UF f52.95 COMPUTER FTWARE
FUND NO 919^ JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/04189 PACE 5
_. REPORT NUMBER AP43
" , •.S3OALDL"• ne u6E_COUML7— '
' CLAIMS PAID 05/10/09 •POSTING DATE 05/13/09
. _ VENDOR—_ --..__ .. . —DES L.......
099635 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 999.0C ICE
.--099636 OLUT"N CO SM 000 Lf -------___SM6TIUM®1'C-INSPRCSIOH-➢1-20,J-IS,P2-)3,37--�.
099637 RNI MARKETING $143.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES i.
099638 RECTC. INC. 339.140.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-I1-88
0996a9---REM-YIN G-SHOE&— •"80,04------- TEMPORARY
RY '
099641 REMEDY TEMP Si$438.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES
099691 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. f930.lS PIPE FITTINGS
—Y 9964B----REYNOLD-POWER TMANSKUS1ON •`-""".OG---- MBGNANCZA6-pePAiRB I�._
099643 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. $444.226.39 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4,J-20
099644 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. $2.852.46 CHEMICALS
099"S5 --.—ROSAN/REYNOPD-1MG REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
099646 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL $3.454.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
09964] ROTANIU4 PRODUCTS CO. $268.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
—049 NB FARE33-K LEEK-CORP •"• "0 PART ems•"" M
M 9649 SANCON ENGINEERING INC. $17.830.00 GENRE REPAIRS
..i 099650 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO. 1]56.61 W SUPPLIES
.f,^ SCNAEFER-6}#ON-ASG0C4ATCi AEA.BB6�}1-------------ENGINEERftIF6ERVIGEb-OESF}HA-- _
a x 099652 THE SCMOOLEP CO. $5,753.00 APPRAISAL SERVICES 'y
= 099653 SEA-BIRO ELECTRONICS. INC. $220.00 LAB SUPPLIES
"`9 "' ^0k6i-Ofd ISMS r1M.i7— OFFICE EPAER6
Q1 w 099655 SHAMROCK SUPPLY Rf458.53 TOOLS 'r
099656 SIGMA CIRCUTS 31033.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
099657-----SL-IDE-M/EERS-VEST— '8---------SOIL TESTINCE9 --
699658 SMITH-FIFEMERY CO. $637$104.94 SOIL INGTIUP !"
69% SMITH FIFE L SUPPLY. INC 3304.94 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
595'%6tr $0. COAST AIR QU-ENT#NEH19 '8-- - SOIL TESTINGES
099E62 SOU COAST AIR DODGE
QUALITY $$37.14 TRUCK FEES
099662 SOUTH COAST DODGE i3T•S4 ]'ROCK PARTS i..
--l99hh]-- --' --'8W7MfR N-CANE Fr-E DISON t0. ----i4
,.�
699664 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $23,263.60 DIESEL FUEL
099665 SPEAR PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION $11,932.60 CONSTRUCTION DIST 14 �.�.
— Yfi,6h SPEC TECH WESTERN— Osviivs ----- --NELDFNOSUPPtFES ---
099667 SPEECO $1.056.33 SCALE MAINTENANCE
o. 099660 ROBERT SPIES $600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ANNUAL REPORT
_. 099670 SCOTT STEVENS $39.75 MEETING MUSE
099671 SUPELCO. INC. $1.145.80 LAS SUPPLIES n.
" E-SUPPotRS-- --3'7Y7'J93'A9
099E73 SUR-LITE CORPORATION $6.384.13 BURNER REPLACEMENTS
099674 7AGGIN• WAGGON MOFILMOME PARK f945.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPATNBMI'
._._. ._.-09969y_..__. .__ TAN-T AN AMINE-. ..
099676 TAYLOR-DUNN $187.06 TRUCK PARTS a 099677 TELEPROOUCTS CORP. $490.40 INSTRUMENT
99*78-- +I-Co HiHE-INSURANCE 3.75B.bB--------- -CRAMT-DEEDS- - ----
C99679 TRAVEL TRAVEL $467.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
899688 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $382.17 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
�n
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/94/89 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITITION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID L15113/89 POSTING DATE 05/10Y09
WARRANT NQi_ YFNOQB AMOUNT ._, DESCRIPTION
�I 099681 TWINING LABORATORIES $I L d52.29 PIPC INSPICTION
099682 UTA-ENINEEA.LbiA INC, 1..261.59 1pg�RI_NC SERVICES P2-60 —. •+
099663 UNOCAL f129.66 GASOLINE
099689 THE UNISOURCE CORP. $154.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
":::Is ___04ITCO PAPM SERVICE 2131.11 ___PARCEL SERVICES
099686 UNITED STATES POSTAL SEPVICE $1,268.03 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
099687 URBAN ALTERNATIVES 98.366.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROD n
p 996Bb V� 6
^� 099689 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. fS.tlb 06 HARDWARE
099690 YAREC DIVISION SA2.58 MlB AHECAL PARTS — �1�
_' p99641 ._V6PfAtl_1NSLRYMENTJiB.QLLP _ f32SzQ-s13 _J,68.SIBpyLes --J'+vl 099692 VEHICLE SPRING SERVICE 6583.99 TRUCK REPAIRS
099693 VERTEX SYSTEMS $4.975.00 COMPUTER SOMME 'a
nggL9e W1ILLNQ_LNDUSI81A1 ex PPLY <e93 n• _ EM7YY SUPP.TP9 —�
099699 VILLAGE NURSERIES $63.94 GROUND COVER 'w
099696 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $5.403.00 WILDING REPAIRS
n9e197 —_.JQMN_R. NAP.LES .. ____ s915.99 _._ppBgyOTROT CQHSULnNc ___.
099698 CARL WARREN 6 CO. 5300.30 LIAR. INSURANCE ADHIN.
C99699 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL S30.196.24 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
Qom ]95)p° PAN.CG__.. S1y62e•99 _MECHASTCAT. PARTS __ a
"= 099701 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $12.360.60 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-10-88 '
099702 VEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. f990.54 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
a
,'bT nee)ns YLLSON t5J.0Y1RNENI_arx)e.<..ur _..— <....9)a_aP vru:Txvvorxn MRYLCR=�_-12— _ IN
-A-i 699704 YOOOWARD CLYDE CONSULTANTS $1,578.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES - PILE DRIVING
099705 XEROX CORP. f5.849.79 COPIER LEASES —
x nee)nc llFRARtM AND_A•PER , nsL PPa"aa rnxSTRnrrmx vn_aT
.u� —---------------
� i y
'P s).2s
---.-... .. . . ... ......TOTAL CL►1M8_RA1D_05/1]L89__
qi 5arrrerPa_Pq s99Rs
v�
:v
�x
w ..d
.Y
_-- _—__-__�.y7
• vl
'+1
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST NORRINO CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/04/89 PACE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
M AINE PAID 05/10/89 POSTING DATE 5/10/89
SUMeNRY ... _-- AMOUNT _.__. __ _ . . _ _—_"__—__ —._ ___ •r
i• 92 AM POND { .
92 AM POND 3,997.51
92 F R POND 253,266266.9595 --_
13 OPER FUND 238,070.38
05
23 AGO FUND 238.575.00 _
•- 3 P R FUNo--�- ------- 575.00 p�
95 OPEN FUND 2,465.95
or
23,111.83
96 ACO FUND 8.396.93 n.
96 P/R FUND 7,SOU.
97 OPER FUND _.__.... _.._ .241.4969 ._
97 AGO FUND
3L.189.87
•' _ , .
97 P FUND 6, 863.60
SIOPEN
6�
FUND.
OPE
FUN
P1T /14 AM FUND
60.16
= /14 AM FUND 69,760.16 �—
11516 AM FUND AS1,91fi.41 ___..___
f7614 OPER FUND 689.14
JT OPER FUND 752.470.45 u.
"E�__.____. 8.550.72 _ b.
D 6ELP FUNDED NURSING
CRS CAMP FUND
FUND 6,147.44 rc
1 JT DIST NOPRINC CAPITAL FUND 186,167.44 la•
r V
--� — f 7.257.049.26
W
Lr
r t.
4'
w
v:
ue v
sa�
..I FULD NO 91b- - JT LIST WONKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/P4 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID C5/24/89 POSTING DATE 05/24/89 •�
A :1
Ir 09975P ARM OUSINCSB MACHINES $21.26 SERVICE AGREEMENT
099761 ADAMSON UNIFORM G EQUIP. $1.568.25 LAB SUPPLIES
• 099762 AIP PRODUCTS S CHEMICAL INC. S4048.90 START-UP FEES
LJ 59976- AMERICAN CHAIN S GEAR CO. $872.36 PUMP PARTS '•�,
399)65 AMERITECH $261.60 COPIER LEASES
p.l 09976 1 7 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $2.417.13 O'RINGS 6 GASKETS
099768 BLAKE P. ANDEPSON $1.410.55 MEETING EXPENSE
jq 099 ATEXSCRYICES. INC. .8491 UNIFORM RENTALS
099771 NICHOLAS ARHONTES 1316.75 MINING 6 MEETING EXPENSE y�
hLEUIXIC SUPPLIER
r.
So 191773 ASB0C1ATEp 8A6 CO. $66.15 OPERATING SUPPLIES Ae
w 099774 B L K PRECISION f85.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR A.
P , .
6n X P90 776 BANK OF AMERICA ^T1SA 111.66 BANK CARDS ev
N•.�=,� 399777 P,L'. 6APOTTI Apo ASSOC. 15.640.3E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P2-33.34,32.37 y
>J
095779 8. BATEMAN $575.00 DEFERRED CRAB DISTRIBUTION N
—1 099780 BATTERIES NEST INC. f419.89 TRUCK PARTS .
P• P497E3 6TTFTSCTETTFT'C-I IIUUL14 TLCER
w I 099)F2 PCY) ENGI NCERING. ITC. S67 d2 COMPRESSOR PARTS
p997P3 6LACK P9A CORP $602.79 COMPUTER HARDWARE
099785 BONNEVILLE EQUIP.. INC. f9.790.0G CRANE SAFETY CERTIPIMTBS
099786 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP S107r699.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES 14-1
PUBLICATION A'
w� p9975R RU.RE ENGINEERING CO. $162.71 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
6t 499789 PUSH AND ASSOCIATLS. INC. f1 027.00 LAND SURVEYING M.0.6-8-88
1 C G R PECONOITIONINC CO. f390.00 MECRANICAI. PARTS _
095)9095)9 CS CDMPAXY 315.59 OXYGEN SUPPLIES
a A99794 CALTROL . INC. 1989.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
.ei 099795 JOHN CAROLLC ENGINEIRS f196094.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34•PI-20.J-15
099797 CHEVRON' U.S.A.. INC. • S2.551.68 OIL 6 DEBASE
099798 CLARK CONSULTANTS $2,640.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
.I C998p6 CUMPRE6SOR COFFORLNTS OF CALIF $2.725.0C GEARS 6 CHAIN
•� 09"bCl CONSOLIDATEC LLECTFICAL GIST. $6,552.16 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
099803 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $285.51 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
099804 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELCCTRIC 91.088.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
p�
o.
FUND AO 919- - JT UIST L'OPYING CLhITAL PROCESSING OATS 5/17/89 PAGE P
REPORT NUMRFR AP43
! CLAIMS PAID 55/24/09 POSTING DATE C5/24/89 t�
099815 CAL WATER $312.32 REVEAL EQUIPMP.NI'
099B4i 2ANl El$ TIRE SERVICE $2.265.76 TIRES
099808 OEZURIN AND/OR CS CC. $3.953.23 VALVE PARTS
fl-�ltlll A-
G45bI6 DORR-OLIVEM. INC. S849.i5 MECHANICAL PARTS
I.a� P99bll DRESSER INOUSTRIFS. INC. $2.472.24 MECHANICAL PARTS
C59613 EASTPAN. INC. $2.935.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES1.
G> 09981. EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $46.00 TRUCK PARTS 1.
6-0 599616 LIEPCRT COIF r • 12.100•41L PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
"• 099F.17 ENGINEERING NE0 RECOIL STO.fO PUBLICATION
099RIR ERYSI COYCC E [ C OVIC2 $t 592 25 LEG11T SER ETLES
jml 095615 JEFF ESSER $130.08 MLMGE E%PBNSF as
09982D NAASMALL FAIRRES 1340.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _ l
w: •
t .
2 099622 FEDEPAL EXPRESS CORA. 6356.0C AIR FREIGHT a
m 099623 FEPRELLGAS $29.25 PROPANE
v.a � •059E25 FISCHER S PORTER CO. $9,862.96 CHLOR MTION PARTS
099826 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $302.64 FILM
v.'�j )59 V2P FOUNTAIN VALLEY FLIRT f724.28 PAINT SUPPLIES
m N P95929 THE FOXBORO CO. s4.348.57 INSTSUMENT SUPPLIES
Ptl
G99831 FRUEHAUF DIVISION $12.455.81 TRUCK REPAIRS
099RJ2 CITY OF FULLERTON 590.21 WATER USEAGE
395634 GICRLICn-P.ITCHFLL, INC. AI.044.05 POMP PARTS
6. 095835 J.Y. GLASC. INC. $511.51 TRAINING VIDEO
099837 GRAPHIC CONTROLS s331.04 INSTRVMENT SUPPLIES p!
099838 TORY GUTIERREZ 1118.02 MININGERPENSE aN
C99b4P FALL, A. HARPER $1.45G.GG DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
099P41 MLTCM E EA RN. INC. 15,577.43 MECHANICAL PARTS
w
099843 HOLRBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 158i.95 COMPRESSOR PARTS
099844 DONALD 0. HONOMICHL 5300.20 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
,.. -t UT 1l TEVI[9 ST56 TI RE[T 1Ny� 695846 R.S. NUGMES CO.. IhP i . 1 RAMOS
]9904] CITY OF MUNTIN6T01i PEACH $143 WATER U
EA.— .S HHpp
xx
Wj
Iw' C99b49 HYOROTEX $7.461.13 TEST EQUIPMENT F6�.•1
09965O ENTERPRISE ENGINE DIV. $46.71 MIGHT PpMpoo.
V6i
6ae
J FUND NO -1- - JT GISI WORMING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 5117/99 PACE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
a CLAIMS PAID 05/24/89 POSTING DATE 05/24/P.9 �I
,
399P51 1SCn C04PAMY 31.066.09 LAB SUPPLIES
111*2711
C99853 J L 6SCIEN7IFIC f17..11 MR. PLIES ui
099654 RIVIERA FINANCE $301.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIER
Im . . 1.4
II C99656 JONES I STONES ASSGC..iNC. 19.729.IP CONSULTING SERVICES RES 88-27
,d 0996.7 PAMAN PEAPINGS T SUPPLY f99O.01 FITTINGS n�
lu 099860 NC CX AN SUPPLY i1.131.03 VALVE PARTS
,u C99060 KING BEARING. INC. $2,004.16 MACHINE SUPPLIES
. , f99062 -ART]'.' KORDICK, SP 12.383.1E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-29.5-30
.95863 LA POTTL ChEMICAL FPODUCTS f185.51 CHEMICALS
!!te�a 0
998
65 LIFCCON-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY $474.41 CYLINDER SEPAin
N.I C95066 LIMITONOUE CORP. 11.082.04 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
Pa ITT N35ES7 Z.T. ETNGF L r IbUl,bi AHCl9A'IAL SOPPI."TES
w X 099866 NPC AFFLIED ENVIRONMENTAL i585.G( OCEAN MONITORING - LAB SERVICES
W�= 699069 P05 36.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS
v. 001.71 MS DATA SERVICE VI CC CORP. i127.20 DATA TRANSFERS
6. -I 099872 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. f661.76 FILTER PRODUCTS
:� b0 099.74 NATI - CPLOA. INC. $37}.1. CHLORINATION PARTS
u. W P99875 MCNASTf R_pARR SUPPLY CO, 383.11 SHAFT SUPPLIES .90
u PS
A99B77 MEDLIN CONROLS CO. f101.83 GAVGE •,
w�099878 HICROAGE COFPUTER $25,692.52
H SOFIVARB/COMPUTERS
u 09986E PIOLAND MFG. CORF. $646.12 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
C99f.61 MILLIPOPC AND/OR WATERS 1129.16 LAB SUPPLIES
e.--Z .
C-9863 JARES M. POKTGOMERY 112:626.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES - POOL AIR SCRUBBERS
U.I 099889 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $2.308.79 HARDWARE
-�9
• REPLACEMENT
Ni. C99606 NATIONAL PLACE RENTALS 3566.43 FENCING
jd A95697 KATIOKAL LUMBER f530.16 HARDWARE
099889 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $842.59 PIPE 6 FITTINGS
�i�969P NEWARK ELECTRONICS 318.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS
�.J f99P92 OLYPPIC CPCUICAL CO. 313,677,16 CHLORINE M.O. 10-12-88
CP9893 ROb EPT J. CCTE1. SM.% TMINING EXPENSE j
Ga9895 ORA116E COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $140.22 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS b.l
G99696 ORANGE VALVE C FITTING CO. f2B9.11 PITTIHGB Iw
�I
FUND NO 41?q - JT LIST WCRKING CAFITLL PROCESSING DATE 5/17189 PAGE r
REPORT NUMBER AP43 _
• CLAIMS PAID 05/24/89 POSTING DATE 35/24/89
'I
la'
499697 OSCAR-$ LOCb A SAFE S130.02 LOCK 6 GETS
allse. SERVICE
+ 094899 COUNTY OF ORANGE $36.100.00 DISPOSAL GATE FEES
699900 COUNTY OF ORANGE S10.000.00 CLAIM 57-66-7B
0999C2 PACIFIC FARTS 61 N67.44 PUMP PARTS
G9?9A5 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMEAI CC. SI.534.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES InI
•1 D9 90N PRCTFTC BECE i$73 SO CELLULAR
�., 099905 FARTCL CELLULAR 434.37 MECHANIC TELEPHONE SERVICES
In1 099906 FARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $g34.37 MECHANICAL PARTS
-�-- - -1 -- ----1 --T l44B 0] IEFYRIIED LRR pISfRIB0TI0R��J'_
w C9996b SAN W. PCTEAS01: S ASSOC. S7.770.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-I1-3
W
099909 PHOTO A SOUND CO. 33N1.60 OFFICE SUPPLICS
099911 PITNEY BONES $126.00 SCALE REPAIR
n� 699912 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $163.30 HARDWARE
s= 09991A POLYFURE. INC. 333.538.65 CATIONIC POLYMER H.0.3-8-89 Iw
09°915 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. 6312.5E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
d94917 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. S4.000.00 INS'IRIIMENTATION IMSP=ION M.0.8-10-all "'
4+1 099918 PULSAFEEDEP $481.05 PIRG PARTS ay.�
R171'1 PUMP LhoINE'E0'f1T"""L !1 Lll:.l PNR PTIG
m 1 09-12R QUALITY PUILOIMC SUPPLY 674.94 BUILDING MATERIALS
vor 09-921 RAINBOW DISFOSAL CO. 3744.56 TRASH DISPOSAL
PI0.3-22-88
099923 0.E0 WING SNCES S1BO.03 SAPEfY SHOES
o 399924 REMECY TEMP S1.136.44 TEMPORARY SERVICES
--099"971 E,,
Aeeg26 TMF RESUPLIC SUFFLV CO. 31.214 PIPE 6 FITTINGS yl
0gg927 PICON COgF 3660.00 COPIES LEASES
oaf 099929 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. 9211.305.58 CONSTRUCTION J-T-A
09°936 SANTA ARA ELECTRIC MOTORS $331.46 ELECTRIC MOTOR
b9493 Y_ �a
P99432 SEA-CIRO CLECTPONICS. INC. $6.565.00 OFFICE MACHINE P'I
1199933 SEA COAST DESIGNS $45.66 OFFICE REPAIRS
My
1... 09°935 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS $416.00 COIL TESTING
4. 099936 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY 17.667.00 PERMIT PIECE
SO I.E., TIP 102ts1 GO 1300 0 PlIlSpll 433043 •
199938 SGUTHERA CALIF. EDISON CO. 2364.673.59 POWER I11I..•ee
09?43q SO. CAL. GAS CO. $5,161.86 NATURAL GAS N^
IMM.P. -sin DBMS
I.we' 09o94I SPARKLETTS ORINKINC•WATER 11.556.23 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RRITAL 1IIL.......
�.� 099942 SPEC TECH WESTERN $332.84 WELDING SUPPLIES H+;
�I he
..J FUND NO 9199 JT LIST WOPVINC CAPITAL PPOP.ESSING 007E 4/17/0° FA6F '
PEPORT NUPREP AP43
'a CLAIMS FAID 05/24/R9 POSTING DATE 05/24/89
a
.I 699943 SPECIAL FLASTIC SYSTEMS, INC. $65.12 TUBING
09991y STAR OW STEEL 3232.91 XSEAL •�I
099946 STAR TOOL R SUPPLY CO. $498.69 TOOLS
u 099916 SUMMIT STEEL 12.tl71.71 METAL
099^99 SUBSFT FORD 615•CI TRUCK PARTS u
099951 THE SUP PLI[AS $1,457.66 TOOLS/HARDWARE
;:I
099952 SURVIVAIR $325.61 ANNUAL INSPECTION
RAINING .1
09995e TAYLOR-OUNN J $173.24 ELECTRIC CART PARTS wi
bay 099995 TEEM-CCSSORIES S52.9V OFFICE SUPPLIES
0
99951 INER NO
ANALYTICAL. INC./NO RC AL 672.04 LAB SERVICES
099956 TILLIM6MAST S1.100.30 CONSULTING SERVICES
v X 09996L. TRUCK 3 AUT6 SUF P LT. .INC. 5919.94 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS f°
W.,= 099a 61 J.G. TUCKER 3 SOL. INC. $6.675.16 ANALYZER PARTS ash
899963 UNITED PAP C E L•SERVICE 14 2.71 PARCEL SERVICES
6. 1 099964 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR $319.75 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Ibl.lb SAE IT SUPPLIES
099966 VVh SCIINT7FIC $6,722.79 US SUPPLIES
iw LJ1 499967 VALLFT CITIES SUFFLY CO. $1.051.00 HARDWARE/FITTINGS .d
099969 VISTA PAINT CORP. f820.19 PAINT SUPPLIES
yi 0999970 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE $2.716.09 SECURITY SERVICES .J
09-972 WILLPAN ASSCCIATE3 S21.242.34 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-2.2-27 �{
0-9979 ROURKE L WCCDPUFF f32.613.51- LEGAL SERVICES M.O. 10-14-87
COPIER LEASES
9-975 GEORGE TA RDLEY ASSOCIATES $193.70 VALVE
099976 ARTHUR YOU h f• f5.993.00 PROPESSIONAL SERVICES
-----------------
ICIAL CLAIPS PAID C5/24/P9 31,739,436.50 .
;I
ry
Imo'
C� ~I'
FUND NO 9199 - IT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/11/89 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP47
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
+i cu2xs PAID 4[B4_F9s;Ipc DAYC 0£LLt3s _ _
H i�
a. .
al UMMA0.Y
• II OPER FUND f 16.56
•• BRFUNO____..
! f2 F/R FUND 32.255.13 �.
1_. 03 OPER FUND l2,701.66
r 13 ADD.FUND-...____ 222,69
J /5 UP ER FOND L.OBB.55 n.
i5 F/R FUND
Pa_B6_OPER FUNK__... _872.01
16 AM FUND 8.145.69
n
/fi FIR FUND 23,160.32 �•'
n'u CPER FOND_ ..._.. _..... is
! 7 AD FUND 21.686.91
I7 P/R FUND 287.24 a
..#113 6O_POPEEOPER
eB._NF2U.NNDD 4..06
f14 AM FUND 5 , 8.71
2895.70
.I 0566 AM FUND 2.680.70
/ E FUND 35.42
7.I6TOPEEFUNn
''..
. 727
.
U b.
FUND836
7T OPER ND .25 .06
11 525 v'
CORP 525.145145.878] I•'
(71 SELP.NNOED.NOHCERiLOULINS IReucF vlixn _6,351
�I IT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 158.277.52
u
+ f1.709.436.50 I�
I✓
Ix M'
14
M:
rc�
i
i
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting
on , 19_n was duly posted for public inspection
at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on
19 % \. u
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this g
day of 1989.
Rita J. Brown, Secretary o
each of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 &
14 of Orange County, California
P�