Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-09-14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.sox 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 18844 ELL15.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9Z788-7919 (714)902-2411 September 7, 1988 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 5, 7, 11, 13 8 14 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of county sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of ' Orange county, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Se etary Tentatively-Scheduled upcoming Meetings: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, September 28th, at 5 : 30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS a ORANGE COUNTY. CAUEONNIA o.a Ball 0127 MWANVLL Y,W MAMA W72e-8127 1O Ew6 sWE J � fW MNV< Y.GUN Ie922W`/ vial WC 10 nlal MB 411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings September Sep 14, 1988 Sep 28, 1988 October Oct 12, 1988 Oct 26, 1988 November Nov 09, 1988 None Scheduled December Dec 14, 1988 None Scheduled January Jan 11, 1989 Jan 25, 1989 February Fab 08, 1989 Feb 22, 1989 March Mar 08, 1989 Mar 22, 1989 April Apr 12, 1989 Apr 26, 1989 May May 10, 1989 May 24, 1989 June Jun 14, 1989 Jun 28, 1989 July Jul 10, 1989 Jul 24, 1989 Aug Aug 09, 1989 None Scheduled September Sep 13 , 1989 Sep 27, 1989 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O.sox 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Volley,CA 9 2 72 8-81 2 7 Telephone:(714)962.2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 - 7: 30 P.M. In accordance with a requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call ( 3 ) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on spec fic agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 9/14/88 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as v mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - August 10, 1988 regular District 2 - August 10, 1988 regular District 3 - August 10, 1988 regular District 5 - August 10, 1988 regular District 6 - August 10, 1988 regular District 7 - August 10, 1988 regular District 11 - August 10, 1988 regular District 13 - August 10, 1988' regular District 14 - August 10, 1988 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consi era ion of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" "B" and C. 8/03/88 8/17/88 8/31/88 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $1,020,077.01 $ 379,367.70 $ 1,371,844.19 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 4,682,233.17 411,144. 80 5,060,952. 39 Joint Working Capital Fund - 114,858.01 109,059 .72 602,983 .62 Self-Funded Insurance Funds , - -0- 6,017 .22 60,738.31 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 29 .93 34.88 547.80 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 1,538,636 . 34 5,831.25 166,500.96 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 219,574.13 123,358.45 324,752.48 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 6,166. 37 12, 319.85 32,125.26 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 5,351.90 - 7.65 339.45 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 36,648.17 14,860.08 12,872.74 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 275,810.70 6,264.20 239,861 .61 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- -0- -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - -a- 23 .07 12,000,114.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 51,875.58 548,886 .20 445,161.64 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 7,674.44 -0- 1, 388.68 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT 3,472.46 160.00 3,181. 11 $7,962.408.21 $1,617, 335.07 $20, 323, 364.24 -2- �..� e 'o 9/14/88 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(o) u All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in - attendance; there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. all items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing a net addition of $16,444.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for modification of fire protection water line, additional utility sleeves and Plant 1 directional signs, additional costs due to scheduling change re construction of west parking lot and substitution of materials to be used for an exterior fire stairway, and granting a time extension of 15 calendar days for completion of the additional work. See page "D- (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts, and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of $204,594.00 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for modifications of precast pile required due to subsurface soil conditions encountered and for costs due to delay to contractor during manufacture of said precast piles; for undisclosed utilities; equipment, materials and site modifications; and other modifications and miscellaneous items; and granting a time extension of 17 calendar days for said delays and additional work. See page "E., -3- w � 9/14/88 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 88-125, approving plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at `..� Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, * and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is September 27, 1968) See page "F" (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 88-126, approving Addendum No. 1 to the. Professional Services Agreement with Jones 8 Stokes Associates, Inc. for preparation of an' Environmental Impact Report for the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Element of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Programmatic EIR, deleting the marine subconsultant services of Kinnetics Laboratories, Inc. and substituting Jones a Stokes' personnel for said work, at no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $213,126.00. See page "G" (a) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of membership in the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) for fiscal year 1988-89 and approving payment of membership dues in the amount of $1,400.00. (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 88-127, approving Agreement with the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy, at al. , providing for the implementation of the Huntington Beach wetlands Restoration Plan, the improvement of Orange County Flood Control District facilities at the Santa Ana River and Talbert Valley Channels, and the ' transfer of a Grant of Easement for conservation purposes by Sanitation Districts to the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy with a reservation to Districts of rights to construct and maintain necessary wastewater treatment and support facilities at Plant No. 2. See page "H" DISTRICT 2 (g) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Willdan- Associates for design and construction services required for Portion of Euclid Interceptor sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3, and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "I" v [ITEM (9) (g) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5] -4- 9/14/88 (9) DISTRICT 2 (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (g) (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 88-129-2, V approving said agreement with willdan Associates for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $112,746.00. See page "J" (h) Consideration of the following actions pursuant to the Board's Redevelopment Agency Policy relative to agreements with the Orange Redevelopment Agency for a partial pass-through of that portion of the property tax increment resulting from application of the District No. 2 historical share ofthe property tax roll for Amendment No. 1 to the Tustin Street Redevelopment Plan, Amendment No. . 2 to the Southwest Redevelopment Plan and for the Northwest Redevelopment Plan: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the City of Orange dated July 29, 1988, proposing said pass-through. See page "R" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 88-130-2, approving Agreements with the Orange Revelopment Agency providing for said partial pass-through relative to said Redevelopment Plans. See page "L" DISTRICT 3 (i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1, authorizing an addition of $26,500.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co. pursuant to contract provisions for payment of bonus for early completion of specified manholes. See page I.M. (j ) Consideration of Resolution No. 88-131-3, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Manhole Adjustments and Street Repairs on Knott Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-34R, to Mladen Buntich Construction Co. in the total amount of _ $369,010.00. See page "N" DISTRICTS 5 6 6 (k) Consideration of Resolution No. 88-132, approving plans and specifications for Replacement of r►� Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is October 18, 1989) . See page "0" -5- 9/14/88 (9) DISTRICT 5 (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Robert Bein, William Frost a Associates, for design of Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, and Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-34, to provide for various modifications and additional services required relative to the Bay Bridge Pump Station. DISTRICT 7 (m) Consideration of motion to receive and file petition from Hugh M. Griffin and Lesson F. Pomeroy III requesting annexation of .96 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity south of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated County territory; and consideration of Resolution No. 88-134-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation No. 127 - Griffin-Pomeroy Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "P" (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 88-133-7, approving Reimbursement Agreement with Darlene J. Fields, dba D. J. a Associates, the developer that constructed a sewer line in Circula Panorama Street which will serve 23 lots located within Tracts Nos. 939 and 916, providing for reimbursement of costs to developer, to be collected from the remaining 14 properties connecting to said sewer based on $3,778.83 per lot. See page DISTRICT 11 (p) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute the Disclaimer of Defendant County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, to Complaint in Eminent Domain, relative to Superior Court Case No. 498713, Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach vs. Huntington Beach Company, at al. See page "R" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -6- 4 a 9/14/88 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to `..� Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27: (a) Verbal staff report (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project providing for minor modifications, additions and deletions to accommodate the work with ongoing and upcoming construction projects. (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 88-128, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation; rejecting the sole bid received for said project; determining that the work can be completed at a lesser price by negotiation in the open market; and authorizing the staff to negotiate a contract with a qualified contractor in an amount not to exceed $1,600,000.00, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. See page "S" (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff and consideration of motion to receive, file and. approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on August 31, 1988 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (13 ) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956 .9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (14) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -7- v • � 9/14/88 (15) DISTRICT 1 OEEer u—siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any �../ (16) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (17 ) DISTRICT 3 Oti�iness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (19) DISTRICT 5 Otl�iness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (21) DISTRICT 6 Other usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 6 Consi eration of motion to adjourn (23 ) DISTRICT 11 0 er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 24) DISTRICT 11 Consia—er—afion of motion to adjourn . (25) DISTRICT 14 OtEer �u—slness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26 ) DISTRICT 14 _ Condon of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICTS 2, 7 6 13 (a) verbal report of staff re proposed ordinances amending Ordinances Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities for Districts Nos. 2, 7 and 13 . (b) verbal report of General Counsel reproposed ordinances . (ITEM 27 CONTINUED ON PAGE 9) _8_ 9/14/88 (27) DISTRICTS 2, 7 8 13 (Continued from Page 8) (c) DISTRICT 2 ONLY Cons era on of action on items relative to proposed Ordinance No. 207, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 205 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities: See page "T" (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated August 23, 1988 re District's proposed connection fee program for capital financing. See page "U" (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 207 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 207, and pass to second reading on October 12, 1988. (d) DISTRICT 7 ONLY Consi era ion of action on items relative to proposed ' Ordinance No. 721, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 Of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 718, Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 720: See page "V" (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated August 30, 1988 re District's proposed connection fee program for capital financing. See page W. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 721 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present).. (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 721 and pass to second reading on October 12, 1988. (a) DISTRICT 13 ONLY Consideration oof action on items relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1304, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1301 Establishing Regulations for use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1302: See page "x" (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated September 6, 1986 re District's proposed connection fee program for capital financing. See page "Y. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 1304 by title only, and waive .reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 1304 and pass to second reading on October 12, 1988. -9- 9/14/88 (28) DISTRICT 2 Oti��usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any I (29 ) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 30) DISTRICT 7 0 hominess and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 31 ) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn .( 32) DISTRICT 13 Oti�5u--siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 33) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- McNAZER'S A05NDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date September 14, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. The following. is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION JOB N Job No. J-7-4, Administration Building Addition, includes the construction of a 20,000 square foot addition to the administration building facility, refurbishment of the existing administration building areas, modular office partitioning and furnishings, and addition of two new parking lots, at a cost of $3,549,000.00. Change Order No. 1 adds $16,444.00 to the job now under construction. The major item of additional work is an increase in size and change in location of the building's fire protection water supply line, and accelerating its installation from the Phase 3 demolition to the Phase A parking lot construction, for a total of $17,846.00. Also included are additional sleeves for future utilities under the Phase A and Phase B parking areas, at a cost of $3,898.00, and additional directional signs for public convenience and deliveries for Plant 1 at a cost of $2,200.00. The Districts' also requested that the Contractor construct the new west employee parking lot prior to beginning the Phase A parking area construction instead of concurrently with Phase A to assure adequate parking facilities at all times at an added a cost of $2,500.00 for move-in expenses for grading, paving and striping crews. A change In materials on the building exterior fire stairway from stainless steel to painted carbon steel resulted in a credit of $10,000 to the Districts. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Co. in the net added amount of $16,444.00. -1- September 14, 1988 9(b): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 TO HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB NO. P1-20, AND DEMOLITION DIGESTERS NOS. 1 N 4; REPLA EMEN BOILER• PI PIN LEAN UT AND GRADINGAND PA AT PLANT N0. J B 1- 1. Job No. PI-20, Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P1-31, Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new 140 million gallon per day influent pumping plant and preliminary treatment facilities at a cost of $31,458,000, the largest single project ever awarded by the Districts. Change Order No. 9 adds $204,594.00 to the contract for construction of the new Plant No. 1 headworks and related facilities now under construction. The most significant changes are two items Of additional work totaling $178,403.00 that pertain to the installation of precast piles due to unexpected subsurface soil conditions. The precast pile items, Nos. 7 and 8, include piling material costs, installation of additional pile footage and payment of contractor's direct costs for project delay impacts resulting from the piling modifications. A change in the boiler hot water tube material from copper to brass to provide greater corrosion protection added a cost of $5,541.00 (Item No. 1). Raising the elevations of the new boiler pads one foot to avoid a drainage conflict with existing adjacent asphalt paving and deletion of drain pipe installation resulted Ina net extra cost of $5,746.00 (Item No. 2). Item No. 3, associated with a project delay caused by an in-plant chlorine alarm which resulted in the evacuation of the construction site by all of the Contractor's personnel , added costs of $2,545.00. The flow ratio controller was modified at a cost of $1,921.00, (Item No. 4) , to accommodate the new primary basin project (PI-33). Also included is the cost for investigation and modification of several existing utility lines not shown on the contract drawings that were discovered during excavation for two new 90-inch headworks effluent lines, in the amount of $9,597.00 (Item No. 5). . The removal of an abandoned concrete box conduit not shown on the contract drawings and which conflicted with the installation of the new Fairview/Gisler incoming trunk line stub-out added a cost of $841.00 (Item No. 6). Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 9 adding $204,594.00 and 17 calendar days to to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. 9(c): APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB N . P2- 7. In July 1987, the Directors approved a professional services contract with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers to conduct design studies of some 45 various items of work and prepare plans and specifications for construction or repair. Several items were modified or eliminated during the design studies and the final plans and specifications, now complete, include 38 items. The work includes relatively minor modifications deemed necessary by the Operations and Maintenance staff, plus several larger items of treatment plant improvements identified in the Districts' long-range master plan. 2_ September 14, 1988 The major items of work include replacement of the domes on Digesters "A" and "B" (originally installed in the early 19501s) due to structural problems and excessive gas leakage, the installation of prepurchased bar screens at Headworks "C", and the replacement of two 30 MGD influent pumps with larger (48 MGD) equipment at Headworks "C". Minor projects include replacement of grit augers, screenings conveyor, digester valves, drip traps, a transformer, chlorine system piping and waste activated sludge pumps. Modifications will be made to the scum boxes at "F" and "G" primary basins, digester relief valves, chlorine alarms and supports for building structures at Headworks "C'. New facilities to be installed include sonic flow meters to improve control of primary effluent distribution, a backup air conditioner to improve Plant 2 computer reliability, sheds for in-plant electric work-cart storage, sampling systems, a standby sludge grinder, bypass piping for waste activated sludge and instrumentation for chemical storage facilities. Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Job No. P2-37, Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. The engineer's estimate for this work is $7 million. A tentative bid date of September 27, 1988 is scheduled. 9(d): APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JONES TOKES ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPA REP RT FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL ELEMENT OF THE COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN PROGRAMMATIC EIR. In March, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. in the amount of $213,126 to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) for the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal element of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Programmatic EIR, as set forth in the Districts' Action Plan for Balanced Environmental Management: Protecting Orange County's Coastal Ocean Waters. The Action Plan includes the EIR, a facilities master plan, financial plan, and special technical studies, all a part of the Districts' application for renewal of the ocean discharge permit, due to expire in February of 1990. Part of the work in the Jones & Stokes contract deals with an analysis of ocean monitoring data developed over the last few years under the Districts' ocean monitoring program. Jones & Stokes had proposed to do this work utilizing the services of Kinnetics Laboratories, Inc. and the contract allowed $30,195.00 for subconsultant fees for these services as well as engineering work by Keith Dunbar and Associates. Jones & Stokes and Kinnetics have not been able to mutually agree on Kinnetics level of effort on the project, and Jones'& Stokes personnel , located in the state of Washington, are now available to perform the same services. Jones & Stokes has requested the approval of Addendum No. 1 to the contract deleting subconsulting work by Kinnetics and substituting in-house personnel . Staff believes that the Jones & Stokes personnel are well qualified to do the work and has no objection to -their requested substitution. No cost change is proposed in the contract, however, the $20,195 �... allocated for marine subconsulting services (of the original $30,195 allocated for all subconsultant services) needs to be reallocated to Jones & Stokes for the additional labor including overhead ($15,595) and direct expenses ($4,600). -3- September 14, 1988 Staff recommends authorization of Addendum No. I amending deleting contractual provision for subconsultants and reallocation of the fees in form approved by the General Counsel. 9(e): 1988-89 SARFPA MEMBERSHIP. The Districts have participated as a member of the Santa Ana River Flood - Protection Agency for a number of years. The membership is made up of public agencies in the Santa Ana River flood plain. The purpose of the organization is to promote the improvement of flood protection facilities along the river which parallels our two treatment plants. Staff recommends our continued participation. The Districts' dues for 1988-89 are $1,400.00. 9(f): APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH HUNTINGTON BEACH WETLANDS CONSERVANCY ET AL GRANTING A WETLANDS EASEMENT OVER SANITATION DISTRICTS' FEE PROPERTY SOUTH OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TREATMENT PLANT. In September 1987, the Directors authorized the General Counsel and staff to prepare necessary documents to transfer a portion of the Districts' property along the southwesterly border of Plant No. 2 to the Orange County Flood Control District and/or the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy and/or CALTRANS for widening of the Santa Ana River mouth, relocation of the Talbert Flood Control Channel , and to allow restoration of the wetlands bordered by the Talbert Channel adjacent to Plant 2 on the north, the Santa Ana River on the east, the Pacific Coast Highway on the south and Brookhurst Street on the west. The eight parties entering into the agreement are the Orange County Flood Control District, Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy, State Coastal Conservancy, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game, California Coastal Commission, City of Huntington Beach and the County Sanitation Districts. The transfer will be made to the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy and will include the granting of a wetlands conservation easement over Districts' fee parcels. The parcels in question are now encumbered by a flood control easement. The conveyance of these property rights does not affect the ability of the Sanitation Districts' to construct or operate facilities at the treatment plant and, in fact, enhances it. The project is part of a cooperative effort with the County of Orange and CALTRANS to provide flood control and highway and wetlands improvements and staff believes the agreement is beneficial to all parties involved. The Directors will recall that the Districts, in related work, will replace deteriorated portions of the old 78-inch ocean outfall sewer underneath Pacific Coast Highway and within the proposed wetlands area to avoid disruption of this area at a later date. The transfer agreement provides that in the event the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy is dissolved, the easement will be transferred to a successor conservancy or revert back to the Sanitation Districts. There is no fee proposed for the granting of the easement. Staff recommends approval of the agreement providing for the property rights transfer and execution of necessary documents in form approved by the General Counsel. -4- September 14, 1988 DISTRICT 2 9(g): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR PORTION OF EU LID INTERCEPTOR SEWER BETWEEN BROADWAY AND ORANGETHORPE AVENUE ONTRA T N0. -2 - AND KATELLA RELIEF EWER, NTRA T N0. -28. In July, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate an engineering services agreement for the preparation of plans and specifications and construction support for a Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-26-3, and Katella Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-28. This work, the last in a series of contracts to construct a new interceptor line in Euclid Street between the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant and Orangethorpe Avenue in the City of Fullerton, is pursuant to Amendment No. 1 to the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts 2, 3 and 11 adopted in June of 1987. As the Directors are aware, the Contract No. 2-26-1 project, between Lampson Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, is now under construction and includes a joint project with the City of Garden Grove. The Contract No. 2-26 project, between Orangewood Avenue northerly to Broadway Street, has been awarded under a joint contract administered by the City of Anaheim. Another project, Contract No. 2-26-2, extending south from Lampson Avenue to Edinger Avenue is under design and will connect to a project that constructed the new Euclid Interceptor from the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant to Edinger Avenue, completed about three years ago. The work under Contract No. 2-26-3 will complete the new Euclid Interceptor Sewer and extend it northerly from Broadway Street in the City of Anaheim to Orangethorpe Avenue in the City of Fullerton, connecting to the new Fullerton-Brea Interceptor Sewer completed last year. Also included is the construction of the Katella Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-28, which will divert water from the overloaded South Anaheim Sewer, a portion of the Newhope-Placentia Trunk Sewer system, to the new Euclid Interceptor Sewer system. The Katella Relief Sewer will extend from Euclid Street easterly to Walnut Street within Katella Avenue. The project requires significant coordination with CALTRANS for a crossing of the Santa Ana Freeway at Euclid Street, and will complement the CALTRANS project to increase lanes on the Santa Ana Freeway. The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee with Willdan Associates for an amount not to exceed $112,746.00 for the work based on hourly rates for labor including overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit. The work includes preparation of a project report which will set the routing alignment, recommend contract units, possible cooperative public works projects with other agencies and provides a basis for construction drawings. Also included in the scope of work is the preparation of the detailed plans and specifications, including preliminary surveys and, finally, construction support. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work, and adoption of a resolution approving a professional services agreement with Willdan Associates to provide the necessary engineering services. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. -5- September 14, 1988 9(h): APPROVE CITY OF ORANGE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TAX PASS-THROUGH AGREEMENT. The Orange Redevelopment Agency and the City of Orange have recently approved development plans for approximately 1,932 acres within District No. 2. These plans are known as Amendment No. 1 to the Tustin Street Development Plan, Amendment No. 2 to the Southwest Development Plan and the Northwest Development Plan. Typical redevelopment agency tax increment financing has been proposed for all three areas. Pursuant to Board policy, staff and the General Counsel have met several times with representatives of the Redevelopment Agency, their consultant and their counsel to negotiate for a tax pass-through. We have agreed to a partial pass-through of the increment of the District's historical 2.85 percent share of the ad valorem taxes allowed under Proposition 13. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the letter from the City of Orange proposing the negotiated pass-through of one-third of the historical District No. 2 share of the property tax and to approve an agreement with the City to provide for the pass-through. Staff recommends approval of the agreement and authorization for the General Manager to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. DISTRICT 3 9(1): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE (VAULT) REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS- N NTRA N -28R-1. Change Order No. 3 adds $26,500.00 to the contract for the rehabilitation of 79 manholes and vaults at various locations on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R-1. The contract is for repair of structures which have deteriorated from the corrosive effects of sewer gases. Change Order No. 3 provides a bonus payment of $26,500.00 for early completion of Manholes Nos. 8 and 30 as specified in Section 50-8 of the contract specifications. Up to twelve manholes are eligible for bonuses because they are located in extremely busy intersections, and the bonus provision was added to provide an incentive for the Contractor to finish the rehabilitation work in these intersections as quickly as possible to minimize the safety hazards as well as the disruption and inconvenience to the motoring public. Manhole No. 8 is in the intersection of Magnolia Street and Hamilton Avenue while Manhole No. 3 is located in the intersection of Warner Avenue and Beach Boulevard. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 adding $26,500.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company. 9(j): AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS AND STREET REPAIRS ON KNOTT INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRA N - 4R. In June, the Directors approved plans and specifications for manhole adjustments and street repairs on Knott Interceptor Sewer from Plant No. 2 to approximately Katella Avenue. This project is located in the Cities of -6- September 14, 1988 Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Westminster, Garden Grove and Stanton, and Includes the Interplant Interceptor in Brackhurst Street, and Reaches 1 through 6, inclusive, of the Knott Interceptor Sewer. Backfill settling around the manholes has resulted in pavement settling and accelerated wear of manhole rings and covers since their installation between 1971 and 1976. The work to be done on 77 manholes includes removal and replacement of the pavement structural section, consolidation of backfill , repair of P.V.C. lining to the manholes and replacement of manhole rings and covers. The work is expected to take place between October 1988 and July 1989. The project drawings have been approved by all affected cities. On August 23, three bids were received for the Manhole Adjustments and Street Repairs on Knott Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-34R. The bids ranged from a high of $542,874.00 to a low of $369,010.00, submitted by Mladen Buntich Construction Co. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the agenda. The original engineer's estimate for this work was $250,000.00, however, the Director of Engineering believes the costs of extensive traffic control measures required for safety and to minimize the inconvenience to the public were underestimated. He believes that with the three bids received, the low bid represents the marketplace cost of the work. Staff recommends award to Mladen Buntich Construction Co. for their low bid amount of $369,010.00. DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 9(k): APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 5- 1. In April , the Directors approved the professional services agreement with Robert Bein, William Frost a Associates, for design and construction services regarding Contract No. 5-31. The ,job includes replacement of approximately 4,500 feet of deteriorated 27-inch diameter mortar-lined and coated steel cylinder pipe force main on the south side of Pacific Coast Highway, from 59th Street to ,just west of the Arches at Newport Boulevard, with 36-inch pipe. The construction is scheduled to precede a CALTRANS highway widening job which will occur in the same stretch of Pacific Coast Highway in early 1989. The work is being closely coordinated with the City of Newport Beach which is managing the CALTRANS ,job. Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31. The engineer's estimate for this work is $1,755,000.00. A tentative bid date of October 18, 1988 is scheduled. DISTRICT 5 90) : AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVI E AGREEMENT ITN R BERT BEIN WILLIAM FROST ASSOCIATES. FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. AND IMPROVEMENT5 TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK bLWER, CONTRACT NO 5- 4. In May, the Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with Robert Bein, William Frost 8 Associates, for design and construction services for Contracts Nos. 5-33 and 5-34. -7- AV- September 14, 1988 Contract No. 5-33, Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, includes the upgrade of the existing Bay Bridge Pump Station constructed in 1966 which is located along the north side of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) in Newport Beach, immediately south of the Upper Bay Channel and Bridge. The original scope of work for the design of Contract No. 5-33 included installing new pumps, motors, drives and shafts for Pumps Nos. 1 and 5 and upgrading Pumps Nos. 2, 3 and 4 with new impellers, motors and shafts. This scope also specified a complete renovation of the existing electrical system in the pump station. During preliminary design, several important items were discovered. CALTRANS is presently planning a widening project along PCH in front of the pump station which will severely restrict necessary access to the pump station for maintenance vehicles. The driveway, street and parking access approaches need to be redesigned in order to accommodate the required vehicle access and street related improvements. Upon closer inspection, structural condition of the pump station has revealed the need for further improvements, and staff is also recommending that the architectural treatment be renovated so that it blends better with the surrounding development. Structural improvements also need to be made to accommodate the latest seismic safety requirements and to accommodate an interior traveling bridge crane needed for servicing the new pumps. Finally, upon review of the design of the existing pump discharge header, it is apparent that it should be replaced to enhance the pump station's reliability. Staff is, therefore, recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate Addendum No. 1 for the additional engineering services required for the above-described modifications to the Bay Bridge Pump Station. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed Addendum will be presented to the Boards for consideration. DISTRICT 7 9(m): RECEIVE FILE AND INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION NO. 127 GRIFFIN- POMER Y ANNEXATION UNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7. The District has received a request from Messrs. High Griffin and Leason Pomeroy to annex 0.96 acres of territory consisting of two parcels in the vicinity south of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated county territory. There is a single-family residence on one parcel and one under construction on the other. The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8, tax exchange for annexing properties. Staff recoimends the actions appearing on the agenda to receive and file the annexation request, and approval of the resolution attached to the supporting documents initiating proceedings for said Annexation No. 127. 9(n): APPROVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR SEWERLINE CONSTRUCTION WITHIN CIRCULA PANORAMA WITH DARLENE J. FIELDS, DBA D.J. 8 ASSOCIATES. D.J. 6 Associates has completed the construction of a sewerline within Circula Panorama Street in unincorporated territory which will serve 23 lots included within Tracts Nos. 916 and 939. The line, constructed in accordance with the District's specifications, was necessary to serve the D.J. & Associates development on five of the 23 lots. Owners of four other lots shared directly in the cost of the construction. -8- September 14, 1988 D.J. & Associates has requested that the District approve a reimbursement agreement which will spread the total cost of $86,913 equally over the 23 benefiting lots. The developer's five lots and the other four prepaid lots are not subject to the reimbursement agreement, leaving 14 lots in the amount of $52,903.62 to be reimbursed at the time a connection permit is issued. The District's standard form reimbursement agreement provides that properties connecting to the sewer pay, in addition to the District's regular connection fee, a fee of $3,778.83 to the District as the fair share of the construction of the sewer. The District would then pay D.J. & Associates, less a 5% administrative charge, the reimbursement amount. The reimbursement period is five years; after that, the reimbursement fee will revert to the District (this is done partially to discourage owners from waiting for the expiration of the agreement before connecting). Staff recommends that the Directors approve the reimbursement agreement with Darlene J. Fields, dba D.J. & Associates in farm approved by the General Manager. DISTRICT 11 9(o): AUTHORIZING FILING OF DISCLAIMER OF INTENT RE EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS OF HUNTIN T N BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. As reported by the General Counsel in closed session at last month's Board meeting, the District was named and served as a party in the eminent domain proceedings being prosecuted by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency in the vicinity of Pacific Coast Highway and Lake Street. Investigation by staff and General Counsel has confirmed that the area of proposed acquisition by the Redevelopment Agency does not include either property interests owned by the District or any facilities owned and operated by the District. The General Counsel has, therefore, recommended the action appearing on the agenda to file a disclaimer of interest and terminate all further participation in these proceedings. ALL DISTRICTS 11: APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1, REJECTION OF SOLE BID RECEIVED FOR ENTRANCES, SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27; AND AUTHORIZIN TAFF TO NEGOTIATE A CONSTRUCTI N RA NTCT FOR SAID WORK. The new main entrance to Plant No. 1 at the southbound 405 Freeway on/off ramp, some interior treatment plant site circulation roads, fencing, a new waste hauler dump site and landscaping are to be constructed under Job No. PS-27, Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1. Significant portions of the interior roads and fencing area also being constructed under Jab No. P1-20, Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, or will be constructed under future Job No. P1-33, Primary Basins 6 through 15, to accommodate multiple construction project interfacing. The one-half acre triangular area ,just outside the new main entrance has been conveyed to the Districts by the City of Fountain Valley and will be landscaped and a bus turnout constructed to improve traffic circulation and public safety and enhance the appearance. Other work designed for future construction contracts includes -9- September 14, 1988 the closing of existing entrances, a new entrance/exit for Districts' maintenance vehicles on Garfield Avenue and perimeter fencing. This project work under Job No. P1-27 requires extensive coordination with several other concurrent Plant 1 construction projects, most particularly with the $31.5 million new headworks job, now under construction by Kiewit Pacific Co., Jobs Nos. R1-20 and P1-31. 1. Addendum No. 1. Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, includes minor piping revisions, electrical service and conduit routing to accommodate construction of the new headworks, administration building, laboratory, warehouse building and city water pump station. Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1. 2. Rejection of Sole Bid Received for Job No. P1-27; and Authorizing Staff to Negotiate a Construction Contract for aid Wa rk. In accordance with applicable- state laws and Districts' policies and procedures for public works projects, Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements in Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, was advertised and sealed bids called for on August 23rd. Only one bid was received in the amount of $1,772,281, submitted by G. A. MacDonald Construction Co. , Inc. The engineer's estimate for this work was $1.5 million. A bid tabulation is attached to the agenda. This contract is primarily a road construction and traffic signalization job, however, it also includes significant piping, landscaping, electrical and control work and relocation of the waste hauler dump station. It appears that the multiple disciplines, coupled with tight working conditions and coordination requirements with other concurrent projects and time restrictions, discouraged road contractors who traditionally use massive grading techniques from bidding the project. The Districts have three options: award the contract to the single bidder; reject the bid and re-bid the project; or, reject the bid as excessive and negotiate a contract with a qualified contractor. We have no reason to believe that rebidding would attract more or lower bids. Staff feels that the work can be accomplished for less than the single bid amount by negotiating in the open market and recommends that the bid be rejected and that the Directors authorize staff to negotiate with qualified contractors for the work in an amount not to exceed $1,600,000.00, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. The General Counsel has reviewed this proposed action and has advised that it is within the Boards' discretion under applicable requirements for public works bidding and contracting. 12: REPORT OF SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF. The Committee met on August 315t, and enclosed for Board members is a written report of their discussions. -10- September 14, 1988 13: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICTS 2, 7 AND 13 27: REVISIONS TO CONNECTION FEE SCHEDULES. Enclosed with the supporting agenda material are separate staff reports for Districts 2, 7 and 13 recommending changes in the respective Districts' sewer connection fee schedules to reflect the current cost of providing sewerage system capacity. -11- RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Al ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA August 31, 1988 ,oaAA Ews AVENUE V O EMS," EW WAIN VALLEY.CALIEORMA W728-8127 n,119622A1 I REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE Meeting Date: August 31, 1988 - 5:30 p.m. SELECT COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Gary Robbins, Urban Alternatives Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don E. Smith, Joint Chairman Ron Hoesterey, Vice Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chairman STAFF PRESENT: Buck Catlin Sally Anne Miller J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Philip Maurer Blake Anderson, Director of Tech. Services Don Roth W.N. Clarke, Sr., General Superintendent Corinne Clawson, Public Information Officer Absent: Richard B. Edgar Tom Mays James Neal 1) Update on Action Plan's Public Participation/Community Outreach Program. The Directors have previously approved the Community Outreach Program and Public Participation Plan prepared by Gary Robbins of Urban Alternatives, the firm engaged by the Joint Boards to provide public participation consulting services to support the Districts' Action Plan. Mr. Robbins reported that one of the early steps in the Public Participation/ Community Outreach Program is to form a focus group to provide a forum for a structured round table discussion of Action Plan issues among participants representing a cross section of interests, to identify important public attitudes and concerns regarding the Districts' wastewater management plans. Focus groups have no statistical validity; they are designed to provide a deeper understanding of the attitudes, values and perspectives underlying a given issue than might otherwise be available through conventional Opinion polling. While the basic ground rules allow for points of information to be exchanged between the facilitator and the participants, extensive "point-counterpoint" interaction between facilitator and participants is discouraged (Districts' staff are not in attendance and the group interaction is led by a moderator/facilitator) because one of the principal objectives of a focus group is to ascertain the existing perceptions and opinions of the participants. Thus, focus groups are more a source of ideas, questions and concerns than of answers and solutions. ..� Mr. Robbins reviewed the feedback from the focus group meeting held On July 14th as outlined in the enclosed summary analysis. The input will be used to help focus the Districts' Action Plan efforts in the upcoming months. -1- Select Committee Report August 31, 1988 Mr. Robbins also reported that the next step in the program would be to conduct a series of public workshops throughout the Districts' service area and reviewed preliminary plans for conducting the sessions. Information on the first round of work shops is being provided to Directors under separate cover. 2) Status Report on New Bee Canyon Landfill Sludge Disposal Alternative. Because landfill co-disposal of sludge with municipal refuse is the most reliable and environmental method it is the Districts' preferred long-term disposal option. However, the Districts' Solids Residuals Management Plan also incorporates a policy of practicing multiple reuse and/or disposal options to maximize recycling and ongoing disposal reliability. Nonetheless, there continues to be a need for a landfill backup disposal option in case other disposal alternatives disappear. Accordingly, the Districts requested that the County of Orange Solid Waste Management Office indicate the potential for future sludge disposal at the new Bee Canyon Landfill when submitting its application to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for a permit to build and operate Bee Canyon northeast of the Irvine City boundary. Coyote Canyon, where we currently dispose of approximately 33% of our sludge production, will be replaced by Bee Canyon when it closes next year. Although the Districts have no immediate plans to propose sludge disposal at Bee because of other existing disposal/reuse alternatives being practiced, it was deemed prudent by our staff to indicate the potential of future sludge disposal at Bee so that the Regional Board would take that into consideration and the landfill could be engineered to accept waste under the most favorable environmental conditions, to the benefit of the citizens of Irvine and Orange County. Further, the Districts pay as much as $3,000,000 per year in tipping fees to the County of Orange based on the proposed new fee schedule. Disposal of sludge at the County's new Bee Canyon Landfill is precluded until CEQA and other requirements are satisfied in accordance with a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the County and Irvine. The Districts fully support its provisions and have proposed to proceed in a manner consistent with its terms and conditions. Staff reported that unfortunately some residents from the North Irvine area, in the vicinity of Bee Canyon and the Irvine City Council have expressed concern over the Districts' request of the County and threatened possible legal action which could delay the opening of Bee. So as not to delay the opening of Bee Canyon next March, the County has, therefore, acceded to the City's request and will not indicate the potential for future sludge disposal in its application to the RWQCB for an operating permit. The Districts are certainly sensitive to the issue and do not wish to impair the opening of Bee Canyon Landfill on schedule. The matter remains open for the future pursuant to the conditions of the MOU between the County and Irvine. Enclosed is a separate staff status report summarizing the Bee Canyon Issue. Staff will continue to work with interested parties to resolve some apparent misunderstandings as to sludge management practices and will keep the �.. Select Committee apprised. -2- URBAN A.LTER NATIVE S • Urban Research • Environmerrial Planning • Housing Program Management FINAL DRAFT SUMMARY ANALYSIS FOCUS GROUP ON CSDOC WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN HELD JULY 14, 1988 AT THE HYATT HOTEL, ANAHEIM Prepared For: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY Action Plan for Balanced Environmental Management Community Outreach Program Fountain Valley, CA. August 24, 1988 FINAL DRAFT SUMMARY ANALYSIS FOCUS CROUP ON CSDOC WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN HELD JULY 14, 1988 AT THE HYATT HOTEL, ANAHEIM INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND A Focus Group is a structured round-table discussion about an issue or topic of mutual concern among individuals representing a cross-section of interests in the community. Focus Groups have no statistical validity; they are designed to provide a deeper understanding of the attitudes, values and perspectives underlying a given issue than might otherwise be available through conventional opinion polling. While the basic ground rules allow for points of information to be exchanged bev, een the facilitator and the participants, extensive" ooint-counterooint" interaction between facilitator and participants is discouraged because one of the principal obiectives of a Focus Group is to ascertain the existing perceptions and opinions of the participants. Thus. Focus Groups are more a source of ideas, auestions and concerns than of answers and solutions. A Focus Group is led by a moderator. The proceedings are completely informal and are recorded by audio equipment and, in most cases, a certified court reporter. A Focus Croup comprised of selected individuals interested in Southern California wastewater management and environmental issues was convened on Thursday, July 14ch, 1988 at the Hyatt Hotel in Anaheim, California. Eight (8) individuals were originally selected and had agreed to participate. Regrettably, the representative from the Orange County Taxpayers Association was unable to attend due to a last- minute illness. As a result, seven (7) individuals participated in the three and 'one-half hour session. The Focus Group was sponsored by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) and was planned and facilitated by the Districts' public participants consultants, Urban Alternatives of Berkeley, California. Representatives from the CSDOC were not present. A complete transcript of the proceedings was prepared and is available for interested parties to review. The specific objectives of this Focus Group were to: (1) present key Action Plan information to a small but reasonably well informed segment of the public; (2) identify and understand the perceptions, priorities and viewpoints of these interests with respect to the Action Plan; and (3) identify concerns, ideas and approaches for consideration in carrying out on- going Action Plan engineering, environmental and fiscal studies. The composition of the Focus Group is presented on the following page. 1 COMPOSITION OF CSDOS JULY 14, 1988 FOCUS GROUP REPRESENTATIVE FOCUS INTEREST CATEGORY GROUP PARTICIPANT Industrial Dennis Archer Anaheim Citrus Products Anaheim, CA Marine Environment/ Richard Simonetti General Environment Chairman Sierra Club, Clean Coastal Waters Task Force Los Angeles, CA Sludge Management Pat McNally Former Member Orange County Solid Waste Management Commission Fullerton, CA Economic/Fiscal Susan DeSantis Executive Director Orange County Taxpayers Association Huntington Beach, CA (Did not attend due to illness) Manger/Controlled Growth Norman Grossman Vice President Citizens for Sensible Growth and Traffic Solutions Laguna Beach, CA Air Quality Mark Abramowitz Coalition for Clean Air Santa Monica, CA General Orange County Mike Ruane, Planner Planning.and Environment Environmental Management Agency of Orange County Santa Ana, CA Marine Recreation Tom Pratte Executive Director Surfrider Foundation Huntington Beach, CA 2 FOCUS GROUP OPINIONS. IDEAS AND FINDINGS The proceedings opened with a slide show providing a synopsis of the Action Plan and reflecting the current thinking of the CSDOC. A lively discussion followed and elicited the following viewpoints: 1. Most Focus Group participants felt that the Action Plan and its associated Facilities Master Plan should be reclamation-driven. The group generally felt that the Action Plan is based on a questionable premise: namely, that water availability will keep pace with the projected wastewater flow over the next 20 to 30 years. While group members noted that the need for significant water reclamation is highlighted by the coincidence of a drought year, most participants felt that in semi-arid Southern California, the continued expectation of an ample, cheap water supply was not a responsible planning assumption. Arizona, they noted, might soon have claim to Colorado River water which could further reduce the supply available to Southern California in the near future. It was argued that the Facilities Master Plan should be conceived around large-scale, upstream reclamation facilities designed to intercept wastewater -flows before they reach the Districts' treatment plants. The 260 million gallons of wastewater treated and discharged by the Districts to the ocean on an average day was seen as a lost resource which should be recaptured. Finally, some members of the group noted that the size of the downstream treatment facilities needed to achieve full secondary, or any other level of treatment, could be substantially reduced if the full range of attainable recycling, conservation and upstream reclamation options were evaluated and implemented. Several participants acknowledged that the overall level of investment needed to implement this type of comprehensive solution would almost certainly be greater than the investment needed to achieve full secondary treatment through expansion of existing plants. This additional investment, they believed, could be amortized, in part, through potential revenues from the sale of high quality reclaimed water and through increases in sewer bills throughout the- Districts. The participants thought that current sewer bills were such a small percentage of the county's average household income that the public would be willing to pay for more progressive wastewater management approaches. DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: A major focus of the Facilities Master Plan now being developed by Carollo-Boyle Engineers will be to address long-term wastewater reclamation. The engineers will be evaluating a wide range of cooperative reclamation opportunities and reclamation plant sites in an attempt to identify feasible options. The Districts currently reclaim up to 15 million gallons of their average daily flow of 260 million gallons of wastewater. The present Facilities Plan objective is to reclaim as much as is feasible of the approximately 400 MGD wastewater flow anticipated by the year 2020. Upstream reclamation facilities will not reduce the facilities to be built in the Districts' overall wastewater management system and, in fact, will increase them. 3 `.." A direct offset of facilities needs won't occur because of system reliability considerations. The Facilities Plan will also address the costs per household and overall capital costs for each reclamation alternative under consideration. Public health and water quality requirements will dictate the type of treatment provided. We know that several practical constraints exist. The current demand for reclaimed water is relatively weak, even at a market price equivalent to 80% of the price of conventional water. Therefore, reliable markets for reclaimed water must first be developed and, need to be located in close proximity to any reclamation facility to be cost effective. In addition, siting upstream reclamation facilities can be very difficult. Reclamation facilities are subject to the same "NIMBY (not in my backyard) Syndrome which affects all public facilities. Finding reclamation facility locations which are both publicly acceptable and in reasonable proximity to the areas in which the reclaimed water would be used represents a difficult challenge. Nevertheless, we are committed to taking advantage of all potential reclamation opportunities within the context of our current Action Plan and in our future wastewater planning efforts. 2. Most of the participants felt that the concept of cross-media trade-offs is conceptually misleading and masks a lack of commitment to attain the maximum achievable environmental standard within each medium. All the participants acknowledged that the wastewater treatment options being considered would create cross-media impacts. But, most argued that it was misleading and counter-productive to pit one media against the other in order to avoid achieving the optimum standard in any one medium. Several Focus Group members stressed that before any cross- media trade-offs are considered, impacts to the various media must first be reduced by minimizing wastes. They contended that it would be more effective to base the Action Plan upon the maximum feasible reduction in wastes, before the Districts are forced to make any choices among the media. They also suggested that the Action Plan emphasis on cross-media trade-offs reduces the possibilities for Facilities Plan problem solving and innovation. Wastewater planning, some insisted, should begin with the objective of attaining the maximum environmental standard feasible within each medium rather than upon the trade-offs which might be needed to meet minimum environmental requirements. In other words, within the constraints of the willingness and ability to pay, the guiding criteria for the planning process should be: what are the least adverse environmental consequences which can be obtained with proven, progressive waste management technologies rather than: which of the disposal media should carry the principal burden and, as a result, require the greatest level of mitigation? DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: Unfortunately, there is an apparent misconception as to the term "cross-media trade-off's". The Action Plan is not ..r designed to pit one medium against another. Our environmental and 4 engineering consultants have been directed to work together to fairly .... and objectively evaluate the impacts and potential mitigations for each medium. Proceeding in this manner will enable us to identify the least adverse/most beneficial environmental consequences which could result from the various actions and plans we are evaluating. We believe the better we understand the cross-media impacts, including their associated costs, the more opportunities we will have for developing Facilities Plan solutions which are not only innovative but implementable. The way in which the concept of balancing cross-media impacts was presented in the slide show may have been misleading. Based on your reaction, we will attempt to present it more clearly. 3. Some participants concluded that the engineering and environmental analysis of the impacts of a single variable-- suspended solids removal over a 75% to 85% range--vas too simplistic a formulation of the problem. Several participants suggested that the three wastewater treatment alternatives represented a very limited, linear conceptualization of the overall range of worthwhile solutions. Instead, the Districts should be considering wastewater planning options which attempt to solve and respond to long-range environmental and quality of life problems likely' to be faced within the region over the next 20 to 30 years. The important problem, they stressed,• is a multi-variare one involving the future quality of life in Orange County and Southern California. The quality of life issue is comprised of numerous variables (e.g. , population growth, employment, housing, technology, etc. ) all of which are affected, in part, by wastewater planning and decision-making. The options presented should address this larger problem and seek the attainment of maximum environmental and public health protection in the process. Some participants theorized that the permit renewal process had, perhaps, cast the problem in a regulatory framework which, in turn, had desensitized the CSDOC to the opportunities for more imaginative and technologically-innovative alternatives. DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: We agree that the Districts' planning efforts should be directed at long-term environmental and quality of life problems specific to Southern California. We must point out that a wastewater agency's influence is somewhat limited by the public policy elements over which it has jurisdiction. The three treatment level alternatives presented at the Focus Group actually comprise a continuum of possibilities. They represent the starting point for the kind of wastewater planning program you envision. In combining this wastewater treatment continuum with systematic cross- media analysis, we believe, we are taking an important step toward solving some of the larger, regional quality of life problems discussed by the Focus Group. This approach is really the essence of cross-media assessment. �r 5 4. There was mixed opinion among Focus Croup members about the range of treatment options that should be considered in the Action Plan. Several Focus Group members felt that the full range of treatment options was not being considered in the Action Plan study process. They felt that two versions of partial secondary treatment (75t and 808 solids removal) , in addition to the full secondary treatment option, represented too limited a range of alternatives. They urged that tertiary treatment be considered along with these other options in order to provide a full spectrum of choices to the public. The representative from the Sierra Club countered this contention by noting that it was unnecessary to produce an effluent of pure water in order to protect_public health. He noted that "full secondary is the best we can get" and "secondary treatment reduces a sufficient number of chemicals and toxics so that it makes the effluent safe--as safe as it can be to the environment." He also stressed the point that achieving tertiary treatment is simply not politically realistic. DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: It is true that the technology exists for wastewater treatment plants to produce the equivalent of drinking water. Not only would the cost of this approach be staggering, but discharging tertiary treated wastewater to the ocean (even assuming 508 of it was reclaimed) is a misallocation of the public's financial resources to produce it because it is highly questionable whether tertiary treated wastewater discharged to the marine environment would constitute an incremental benefit to the ocean ecosystem. That is why the fundamental question guiding our Action Plan studies is: "What is the optimum level of wastewater treatment needed to protect public health and provide balanced environmental protection?" Subjecting 100% of our wastewater flow to full tertiary treatment does not appear to be a.prudent policy -- even if a moderate to healthy demand for reclaimed water is assumed. 5 There was a general consensus among the group that Orange County residents would willingly pay for high levels of environmental protection. There was general agreement that most Orange County residents would have little resistance to paying for the increased cost of advanced levels of wastewater treatment and environmental protection. It was presumed by most participants that the cost for full secondary treatment and beyond would not exceed $100 to $200 annually for Orange County households. One participant cited the example of south county residents who have absorbed annual sewer increases for the past six years without protest. However, several participants mentioned that Orange County inland communities northeast of the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5) might be less receptive to supporting increased levels of wastewater treatment than those located southwest of I-5. Some participants noted that a survey to measure payment tolerance in relation to advanced treatment levels among Orange County service recipients might be worth v considering. 6 DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: Your perceptions about the willingness of Orange County residents to pay for various levels of environmental protection may or may not be accurate. Increasing the "assessments" to support public activities has historically met with considerable resistance in Orange County. Because we are a public agency and charged, among other things, with the responsibility of prudently managing the public's funds, we must consider the cost impacts of alternative policies on all our service recipients. We cannot ignore ratepayers who are poor, aged or who have marginal incomes. Part of our Action Plan includes a fifteen month Community Outreach Program which will help us ascertain public attitudes regarding cost and payment issues. Your views on this question have provided us with the first early indication of public opinion. 6. One Focus Group member felt that several promising new sludge management techniques could reduce land impacts as an important factor in the treatment level policy decision. One Focus Group member suggested that several new technical advances in sludge processing have demonstrated significant levels of public acceptance and environmental safety when used in land applications in several locations in the U.S. Midwest. He felt that new sludge stabilization processes such as CKD (an admixture of cement, kiln dust and lime) could expand the Districts' land-based sludge management options by effectively increasing its acceptability for land application and disposal. He, therefore, urged that the land element of the cross- media impacts equation not be given excessive weight and that Chase new sludge processing technologies be factored into the upcoming treatment level policy decision. DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: We think the case for significantly increased public acceptance of land-based sludge disposal options is somewhat overstated. The CKD process, for example, has several advantages. It significantly reduces pathogens and raises ph levels. However, its major drawback is that it does not significantly reduce potential risks associated with heavy metals. Our experience has been that the public perception of sludge, no matter how it is processed or packaged, still reflects a stigma which makes siting land-based options extremely difficult. Many of the potential land-based disposal/reuse solutions are out-of-county options. Unfortunately, these are beginning to be impacted by local legislative requirements and prohibitions against sludge from other jurisdictions. Within Orange County itself, local opposition to sludge disposal and reuse options may impact future management options. New sludge technologies and approaches are continually being developed. The Districts will consider all ideas, so please keep us informed of any information that you think will be helpful. We have made some dramatic changes in our own sludge management program in the last ten to fifteen months. The Districts now recycle nearly 50% of the sludge we produce. The goal of our Action Plan is to secure independent, multiple sludge disposal options, so that the Districts have the flexibility needed to 7 ensure that the necessary disposal capability is available at all times. 7. Most participants believed that the greatest obstacles to meeting wastewater-based air quality requirements are procedural, not engineering. Several members of the Focus Group concurred that the South Coast AQMD's tortuous regulatory compliance process represents the Districts' greatest obstacle to meeting Basin air quality emissions standards. The representative from the Orange County Environmental Management Agency (EMA) noted that the Districts might be unable to implement a higher level of wastewater treatment because of the AQMD's confusing and contradictory procedural, administrative and permit requirements. Several participants concurred. They maintained that the process is excessively confrontational, is characterized by enormous backlogs and forces the applicant to adopt the media trade-off viewpoint expressed in the Action Plan. The EMA representative indicated that the two regulatory tracks for clean water and clean air currently don't "mesh" and, as a result, transmit the implicit message that "If you want clean water, you can't have clean air. " The Districts, he felt, must push for some kind of coordinated air/water package and should forcefully challenge the air regulatory environment during the Action Plan process. The representative from the Coalition for Clean Air noted that the current AQMD regulatory framework discourages public agencies like the Districts from seeking innovative solutions to environmental problems, although he did feel that the AQMD's organizational efficiency was gradually improving with the addition of new staff and a bigger budget. DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: While some of the air quality problems experienced by the Districts today have no available technological solutions, we concur that AQMD procedural requirements are a greater obstacle to achieving clean water/ clean air compatibility. The Districts recognize that they must make a concerted effort to obtain coordinated air/water regulations. We have been instrumentally in bringing the air/water regulatory players on a regional, state and federal level to address this issue. Key members of our staff make continual personal contact with regulators at each of these levels to make them aware of some of the inherent conflicts and incompatibilities in air/water regulations. Progress has been made and Districts' staff and consultants played a principal role in the preparation of the recent report "The Impact of Toxic Air Quality Regulations on California Publicly Owned Treatment Works", a joint effort of federal, state, regional and local regulatory agencies and POTW's, to help address the issues. At the risk of sounding immodest, we believe no one in the country does more than the Districts in trying.to resolve this and other wastewater management issues. ..r 8 8. One Focus Group member argued that meeting air quality and water quality �r standards may not be as insurmountable as currently believed. But, major treatment plant expansion might, he suggested, conflict with the Clean Air Act. The Coalition for Clean Air representative indicated that he was not convinced that the Districts actual emission could not meet Los Angeles Basin adopted air quality requirements under a full secondary treatment scenario. It was his belief that all treatment plant emissions, including VOCs, could be adequately treated. In his view, meeting Basin air quality physical requirements need not be a major trade-off factor in the treatment level policy decision. One Focus Group member and one of the co-facilitators suggested that the representative from the Coalition for Clean Air should consider providing the Districts with any technical information that he might have that demonstrates a way to resolve this air/water regulatory dilemma. In addition, the Coalition for Clean Air representative noted that, in some cases, the expansion of treatment plant facilities could be illegal under the Clean Air Act. Treatment plant expansion, he noted, may be subject to regulation under the Act, due to the air pollution effects of population growth attributable to the increased capacity. He pointed out that a public directive about this point and its applicability to a San Fernando Valley treatment plant built by the City of Los Angeles. in 1982 was about to be issued by EPA. The essence of the directive, he reported, was that the plant's capacity could not be expanded above specific levels because of the growth-induced air quality emissions which would result. The participant from the EMA countered that a freeze in sewer capacity and a resulting decrease in housing growth would still result in an increased flow. To compensate for the static housing supply, he argued, the average number of persons per household would eventually increase, thereby increasing the flow anyway. The Clean Air Coalition representative's response was that effective conservation policies could offset this anticipated increase in residential flow. DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: The Districts are not aware of any existing technologies that could adequately address the problems of certain treatment plant emissions, including VOCs. We would be most receptive to any technical information that could help us with these air quality issues. It is currently unclear to us whether treatment plant expansion would be subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act due to the air pollution impacts associated with increased plant capacity. Recent amendments to California Air Resources Board regulations might make this a moot point. We will continue to check on this point to obtain a definitive answer. In any event, this is an issue that will be addressed in the Facilities Master Plan EIR. 9 9. Most group members agreed that the Action Plan should include a comprehensive cost/benefit evaluation of all the most promising wastewater management options. Most of the participants felt that the three Action Plan treatment options, as well as other planning options suggested by the Focus Group (e.g. , 60 MGD upstream reclamation facilities) , should be subject to a thorough cost/benefit evaluation in order to determine the most favorable wastewater management alternatives for Orange County. Several individuals expressed the need for a market study of the absorptive capacity of the service area and the region for the use of reclaimed water at various levels of purity and the use of sludge at various levels of processing and treatment. It was noted that the Action Plan financial study covers the attainment of a balance by the CSDOC between revenues, on the one hand, and debt service and operating expenses on the ocher. But, some participants noted, what is also needed is an economic analysis to show the benefits and costs of the various wastewater management options considered and to whom these might accrue. In effect, a "total balance sheet" was suggested. DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: A comparison of the capital, operational and maintenance costs for each alternative will be completed as part of the facilities planning effort. It is difficult to assign dollar "benefits" to all of the effects of the various treatment options (i.e. the benefit in monetary terms of different solids and organic loadings of the various treatment levels on the marine environment or the benefit of reduced visual impacts of facilities on the surrounding community.) However, based on the facilities planning cost comparisons, it will be possible to evaluate the potential "tradeoffs" , both environmental and financial, associated with the various levels of treatment. 10. The Focus Group industrial spokesman indicated that more stringent levels of wastewater treatment could reduce the viability of some Orange County businesses and could force others to cease operation or leave the area. The industrial representative reasoned that, for industry in general, any additional costs involved in increasing the level of treatment would be primarily allocated to BOD discharge. High BOO dischargers, like his company, would expect a significantly greater cost burden under a full secondary treatment regime. These costs, he believed, would have to be passed along in the price of goods and could eventually render many businesses noncompetitive. He indicated that his own business (citrus processing) would face strong competition from similar businesses in South America which do not have environmental regulatory cost pressures. He emphasized that wastewater treatment regulations are one of the disincentives that would force him to consider locating outside of Southern California, if he were starting up his current business today. 10 DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: The economic impacts of the alternative wastewater `✓ treatment and facilities options will be addressed in the EIR. The impacts of each option upon industry, business and employment will be thoroughly examined. 11. The industrial representative suggested that industrial plants in the food processing industry have not reached their potential for recycling and reusing water. The Focus Group industrial representative also felt that the possibilities for recycling water within the food processing industry hadn't begun to approach their full potential. DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: The Districts' Industrial Use Ordinance has existing provisions to encourage water conservation. We will explore the potential for further water recycling in the waste discharge process with the Districts' industrial permittees. 12. One participant contended that the Districts' industrial pre- treatment program is seriously deficient and does not meet accepted standards for removal of toxic constituents and heavy metals. The representative from the Coalition for Clean Air stated that he understood that the CSDOC's "pre-treatment standards were severely lacking". He indicated that he had participated in writing a report on the subject of industrial pre-treatment several years ago and that his impression was that there was widespread non-compliance by the Districts. One of the co-facilitators pointed out that this was an erroneous impression and that the Districts are in compliance with the California Ocean Plan and, in fact, meet or exceed all of the P1an0s performance standards for the removal of toxic constituents and heavy metals. DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: The Sanitation Districts' have an Industrial Waste Pretreatment Program that has been approved by the EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. As a result of cooperation from the Orange County industrial community and the Districts' aggressive enforcement program, industrial discharges have decreased substantially in the last 12 years. All California Ocean Plan constituent limits are consistently achieved with a wide margin of safety. The success of our program was instrumental in EPA/CRWQCB's decision to issue our current 301(h) NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit. 13. Two participants felt that the CSDOC should be formally brought into the ' emerging growth management structure now being developed by county government. . Two Focus Group participants currently serve on a county-sponsored citizens committee charged with developing a growth management plan for Orange County. One of these individuals noted that county government is moving towards a more active role in planning for local growth, partly in response to the recently defeated growth control measure. Because 11 �+ sewer capacity planning tends to have far-reaching consequences on community development and growth patterns, he felt that the CSDOC should be included in whatever formal organizational structure is recommended by the committee and adopted by the county. There was mixed opinion within the group about whether the Districts are a passive service agency or a direct, but unofficial, participant in the growth-planning process. DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: This is a policy decision to be made by the Districts' Directors and other local Orange County elected officials. 14. The marine recreational representative noted that new studies suggest some bacteria and viruses presumed dormant reactivate after several days in the ocean. The Focus Group marine recreational participant pointed out that recent studies by Dr. J. Williams on the U.S. East Coast have shown that some bacteria and viruses do not die off in the ocean within a week, as originally thought. Some have been observed to enter a dormant stage and become active again. He explained that some of these pathogens were found to be noncultureable in an ocean environment. As a result, they are not detectable through the existing monitoring program and, he concluded, provide a compelling reason for achieving "zero discharge". DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: The theory and hypotheses that enteric pathogens survive for very long periods of time in seawater has been advanced by several researchers on the U.S. East Coast. Research to date has only been able to hypothesize or speculate that these noncultureable bacteria are a potential public health hazard. There has been no evidence to link these bacteria with any form of illness and the research applicability to California coastal waters remains to be investigated. This issue will require continued investigation and monitoring, but until there is evidence of linkage between these noncultureable bacteria and a tangible public health effect, these bacteria would not be a major factor in wastewater treatment public policy. 15. It was noted by one participant that some Districts' officials had publicly asked for support in obtaining a new waiver and that this could undermine the credibility of the Action Plan process. One Focus Group member was concerned because of his impression that a CSDOC Board member had publicly sought support for 1990 renewal of the Districts' ocean waiver. He was concerned that, if true, it left the impression that a representative of the Districts had already made up his mind about the treatment level policy decision well before any of the Action Plan factual data had been collected and analyzed. He suggested that greater public awareness of who the Districts' Board members are might help sensitize each Board member to the full range of public sentiment about the waiver issue. To accomplish this, he proposed that the Community Outreach Program routinely include the names and municipal affiliations of the Districts' Board members as an attachment to all written public information products. . 12 DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: By early September, 1988, all CSDOC Board members, managers and officials will review an informational video and other printed material that provides the necessary background information on the Action Plan and the wastewater treatment policy question. The purpose of the Action Plan is to bring together all the environmental, engineering and fiscal information needed to evaluate the alternative treatment and facilities options. When the video is previewed, we will be certain to reinforce one of the key points of the video -- that the Action Plan is an open, independent investigation of the treatment level policy question. While each of us may have a preconceived outlook on this issue, we will urge that everyone, including our staff and the interested public, review and evaluate the facts as they become available and that they reach a conclusion on that basis. 16. Various participants raised the following factual questions which may be brought up again in later public meetings as the planning process proceeds: A. Is monitoring required at an 85% level of solids removal? CSDOC Response: Yes, monitoring at the full secondary level is required by EPA and the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. B. Did the 1972 Clean Water Act call for zero discharge? CSDOC Response: The 1972 legislation indicates that "zero discharge" was the national goal, but communities which could not achieve zero discharge by 1981 and after a good faith effort, were required to apply "best available technology" to the problem. C. What water quality standards are found in the California Ocean Plan? CSDOC Response: The California Ocean Plan requires 75% level of solids removal and sets specific discharge limits for heavy metals and toxic constituents. These latter regulations are not specifically found in the U.S. Clean Water Act. 17. Most of the Focus Group participants felt that the Action Plan slide presentation was adequate and appropriate for presentation to lay audiences but too simplistic for more environmentally sophisticated viewers. Informal, off-the-record discussions with the participants indicated that they believed the slide presentation would be useful for lay audiences but was too simplistic for their own needs. Several Focus Group members said that they were more concerned about toxic constituents and heavy metals in treated wastewater than they were about the level of solids removal. While they understood that these two components were closely related, they felt it would be useful to have additional slides indicating the Districts' level of performance with respect to California Ocean Plan toxic constituents standards. Several participants had difficulty understanding the concept that the increase 13 in plant facilities required to achieve the two most stringent treatment standards represented an additional increment to the facilities needed to meet increasing future flows. Several group members suggested that a slide depicting this relationship would be helpful. DISTRICTS' RESPONSE: These suggestions to improve our presentation are excellent and quite helpful. We will be adding the information suggested to our slide presentation and to some of the informational materials used in the Action Plan public participation program. The presentation will also be tailored to the specific audiences. CONCLUSIONS 1. The straight-line engineering approach inherent in the 75%-808-858 solids removal options may not meet the expectations of some members of the public for responsible, progressive wastewater planning for the next generation of Orange County residents. The Focus Group participants generally viewed the Action Plan's scope and purpose as less ambitious and innovative than they would like. While they saw the treatment alternatives policy decision as a very important element of the Action Plan process, they wanted to see a Facilities Master Plan designed to directly address some of the wastewater-related quality of life problems (e.g. , water availability, population growth, air pollution, etc. ) facing Orange County and Southern California. The fact ;hat the Facilities Master Plan has a long-term (30 year) planning horizon may have contributed to inflating the group's expectations. In their view, perhaps the fundamental Action Plan question is: "What is the optimum wastewater management plan to enhance the quality of life and protect public health and the environment?" Whether this point of view is representative of other members of the public remains to be seen. 2. The concept of cross-media trade-offs, the fundamental Action Plan conceptual approach, may be perceived as a major programmatic "cop-out" by the more environmentally and politically-sophisticated members of the public. 3. The integrity and credibility of the Action Plan investigative process could be quickly eroded if Districts' officials give the public the impression that the treatment level policy decision has already been made. 4. A cost/benefit analysis of the various wastewater planning alternatives may be as or more important than financial and revenue studies in influencing public opinion about a preferred treatment option and any associated wastewater management alternatives. 5. The current attempt by the county to integrate selected growth management values into the established Orange County planning structure may draw the Districts into a more formal, active role in local land use and development decisions in the future. 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d ORANGE COUNTY.CAUFORNIA _ August 31 , 1988 1a Ews AVENUE V0 BOA e+z) E WAM VA4Er.MIM MA 92728.8127 mei sea2A11 STAFF REPORT RE STATUS ON NEW BEE CANYON LANDFILL SLUDGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVE In 1983 the Boards adopted a short and long-term sludge management plan that selected as the preferred long-term disposal option, the continuation of the cooperative program with the County of Orange for co-disposal of sludge and refuse at County landfills. The plan also provided for pursuit of other disposal alternatives which the Districts have continued to study and implement. The Boards have since adopted a policy of practicing multiple options to maximize reuse and disposal alternatives and reliability. For example, we have recently entered into contracts with several private firms for sludge reuse and almost one-half of our daily sludge production is presently recycled for beneficial use by direct application to agricultural land or as a compost material. Nonetheless, there continues to be a need for a landfill backup disposal option in case other disposal alternatives disappear. Historically, landfill co-disposal is the most cost- effective and reliable method. The logical long-term co-disposal site is the County's new Bee Canyon Landfill in Irvine. There are several reasons for this, including that Bee is the replacement for Coyote Canyon where, heretofore, the majority of our sludge has been taken (Coyote Canyon Landfill is now scheduled to begin closure in March, 1989 ) ; it will have adequate refuse to meet the required mix ratios; it is remote yet close and centrally located; it is the most reliable, cost-effective site; it is a new landfill and thus, can be engineered to accept waste under the most favorable environmental conditions; and Irvine- s and Orange County's taxpayers would benefit from the annual tipping fee paid by the Districts, estimated to be over $3 million per year (based on the proposed new fee) . Disposal of sludge at the County's new Bee Canyon Landfill is precluded until CEQA and other requirements are satisfied in accordance with a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the County and Irvine. The Districts fully support its provisions and have proposed to proceed in a manner consistent with its terms and conditions. The first step for the County to obtain an operating permit from the Regional Water Control Board (RWQCB) for Bee Canyon Landfill is the submittal of an "Application for Facility Permit/waste Discharge, " Form 200. In order to assure that the -1- August 31, 198P r RWQCB would consider the Bee Canyon application and issue the permit in a manner so as not to preclude sludge disposal at Bee Canyon some time in the future, the Districts proposed to the County that when submitting its application to RWQCB for Bee Canyon, the box on the application form indicating the potential for future sewage sludge disposal be checked, with the qualification that such disposal would be subject to completion of an environmental assessment and environmental impact report in full satisfaction of the terms and conditions of the MOU between the County and the City of Irvine. This would avoid future delays and duplication of regulatory hearings. It is also in keeping with the full spirit and intent of the MOU. Checking the box is not a request for disposal of sludge in Bee Canyon, but, rather, an indication to the RWQCB that the future potential is there as set forth in the MOU. Although we have no immediate plans for sludge disposal at Bee because we have been able to develop other disposal options since adoption of the original plan by the Boards in 1983, if sludge disposal is proposed at some time in the future, it would be only after completion of the environmental assessment and EIR in full compliance with the terms and conditions of the MOU. Consideration of the Bee Canyon permit by the RWQCB in the context of future potential for sludge disposal would be in the best interests of the residents of Irvine and the entire County, with or without sludge. Again, it would assure that the Regional Water Quality Control Board would consider the operating permit in a manner so as not to preclude sludge disposal at Bee Canyon should it be proposed and approved some time in the future if the MOU provisions are satisfied; and require its construction in an environmentally sound manner in accordance with the latest technology. If the County proceeds as proposed by the Districts, we have offered to provide funding assistance for appropriate construction of the Bee Canyon Landfill to assure these goals are achieved. In May, staff reported to the Directors that the City of Irvine, anticipating reaction from the Irvine communities in Northwood which are the closest residents to the Bee Canyon Landfill site, had expressed concern over our request to the County with regard to the Bee Canyon.Landfill permit application. In order to allay these concerns, on May 17th Districts' staff, along with County Solid Waste Management Office' s staff met with representatives of the North Irvine Villages Association (NIVA) and City of Irvine officials. The outcome of that meeting was a consensus that what had been proposed was reasonable and that City staff and NIVA had no concerns with the proposed action (see Item 1 of enclosed yellow copy of City of Irvine memorandum dated May 27 , 1988) . Since that meeting, the following events have taken place: • On July 11, 1988 the County of orange General Services Agency, Waste Management Program Office, submitted the -2- f i August 31, 198A Bee Canyon Landfill permit application to the RWQCB. (See attached gray copy of application facsimile indicating Distr cts ' request. ) • On July 18, 1988 NIVA wrote to the Districts apparently reversing their May 17 position. (See enclosed buff copy of NIVA letter. ) • On July 20, 1988 NIVA met with City of Irvine officials to discuss the Bee Canyon Landfill, including the- issue of potential sludge disposal. (See enclosed blue copy of NIVA discussion outline dated July 13, 1988. ) • On August 4, 1988 Districts' staff, along with County Waste Management Program office staff met with City of Irvine staff who reiterated the concerns expressed by NIVA and advised that NIVA now appeared to be unalterably opposed to sludge disposal at Bee Canyon and further advised that NIVA would probably have the support of a majority of the City Council. The City suggested that the Districts and the County consider amending the Bee Canyon permit application deleting the check in the box indicating the potential for future sludge disposal to avoid any possible confrontation at this time which could delay the opening of Bee. • During the discussions with the City staff on August 4, it became apparent that the course of action regarding the Bee Canyon permit application was misunderstood by some and that there were several misconceptions concerning the practice of sludge disposal. Accordingly, on July 9, Districts ' staff formally requested that the County delay consideration of amending the Bee Canyon permit application pending an opportunity to meet with the affected parties in an attempt to clarify the misinformation or misunderstandings. (See enclosed green copy of letter to GSA Director dated August 9, 1988. ) • On August 18, 1988, The Districts received notification that the County had amended its application to the RWQCB for the Bee Canyon Landfill permit, deleting the check from Box IV.A. indicating the potential for future sludge disposal at the landfill. (See enclosed lavender copy of letter from the County to the Districts dateTAugust 16, 1988; and pink copy of letter from the County to the RWQCB dated August 16, 1988. ) The County' s letter indicates their decision was based on concerns that the issue might affect the timely opening of Bee Canyon; a concern that the Districts are certainly sensitive to. ..r -3- August 31 , 198? On August 23 , 1988 the Irvine City Council considered and .... approved a Bee Canyon Landfill Status Report from its staff. (See enclosed white copy of status report cover memorandum, and attached section relating to sludge disposal excerpted from said Irvine City staff' s status report to the Council. ) Staff will continue to work on the Bee Canyon situation and keep the Directors apprised. -4- ;rwz MAY 27, 1988 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: MANAGER OF PLANNING SERVICES SUBJECT: BEE CANYON LANDFILL - STATUS REPORT On May 17, 1988, the City Manager and staff met with Councilwoman Sally Anne Miller, Frank Bowerman of County General Services Agency, Wayne Sylvester of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSO) , and representatives from the North Irvine Villages Association (VIVA) to discuss issues pertaining to the construction and operation of Bee Canyon Landfill. The following summarizes items discussed: 1. Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB) Permit Application for Bee Canyon Landfill - The Orange County Sanitation District is requesting the County of Orange Waste Management Program to indicate, on their application to the California RWQCB (for a permit to construct and operate the Bee Canyon Landfill) the potential for sludge disposal (Attachment 1) . This application is not a_ request for sludge disposal, but rather to . indicate that the future potential is there as set forth in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the County of Orange, so that the RWQCB will take this issue into account when considering the permit for Bee Canyon. As indicated in the MOD, sludge disposal is prohibited unless and until a new environmental assessment and an environmental impact report is prepared in full satisfaction with the terms and conditions of the MOU. Staff and NIVA have reviewed OCSD's .request and have no concerns with this action. 2 . Bee Canyon Conditional Use Permit 87-23P & Addendum to EIR 018 (County of Orange) - During the past year, staff has been working closely with the County Environmental Management and General Services Agencies to ensure that the requirements identified in the Memorandum of Understanding for Bee Canyon Lar'dfill are identified and implemented through the proposed Conditional Use Permit and EIR Addendum. Staff has reviewed the proposed mitigation measures and response to City comments and determined that the environmental addendum adequately addressed the . requirements identified in the MOD (Attachment 2) . On May 12, 1988, staff met with representatives of NIVA to review Page 2 .r and discuss the County's response. NIVA's concerns included the timing of the installation of landscaping for the access road, the County's position on resource recovery, and the proposed truck routes for Bee Canyon Landfill disposal. These issues were further discussed and resolved on May 17, 1988. 3 . Hearing date for Conditional Use Permit & EIR Addendum - The hearing date for the Conditional Use Permit and EIR Addendum before the County Planning Commission will be held on June 6, 1988. Staff is currently finalizing City comments on this issue. Any additional comments associated with the Conditional Use Permit and EIR Addendum will need to be forwarded to the County by June 3, 1968. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please contact Charlene Gallina at 660-3934 by June 1, 1988. TaC PA L IRELAND ` rector of Community Development Attachments PI/CG:camd/cg-bee Attachments cc: Frank Bowerman Tom Wright Michael Ruane - Grace Fong Wayne Sylvester Jim Frisbee Diana Von Bores Joe Belles Files: General 87-GS-0163 r �. .1 -r r�iJ ]tj , n STATE OF CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD DEPARTMENT Or HE'+LTH SERVICE—. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMCHT BOARD nARTMENT Or rORESE RY A • APPLICATION FOR FACILITY PERMIT/WASTE DISCHARGE This tam is to be used for filing a/an: (check all appropriate) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1. ❑ REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE F..m=0 Reed Ipuraaaet to DiVsian T of the Soft Wa.r Cadd F.IRWQCSI_(SwIldel _ Z APPLICATION FOR A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PERMIT Lester w 01frherger Ipunuant w Health and Safety Cade Section 25300) Resort Redd 3. Q APPLICATION FOR A SOLID WASTE FACILITIES PERMIT Ipnwaee ItsGowmmmt Code Senior 66798.301 EffanM Dau 4. APPLICATION FOR A RUBBISH DUMP PERMIT - COF Ndtined oument Is Publl[Reeura.Cowi SevoiE,4071 SOTS and 44381 DONS No. SWMB No. I. rwnuTY .. x.INr Or r.ao.0 c.xa•e. r.crur. (.......). C. PAINE er.u.e..af O.vAL.....CIUT. .....••) v. ae5.1.Frdwl.wlNip..+Ine •c.❑u+ pastneMic, � Cawawhon Gowmrpent AgErOr .. .... ....n I ) n, wtwsan . n Hunt A. New discie"m oxfaOlitT 0. Change in chreewr of disreuna. G. Change in brumete awranng faclltV a. Eaenwgdisonsg. crooliry E. Ch.ng.jn.late air .th mao efolisofte H. Eno ofte.Ofinmeg Ndliw C. Inceae in ouandry al dishary� F. Change in deign w acrason I. Other lexcler,wldwl I.. TV..ar o.cwwrran t� A. Tra.fr mean O. 15 -Z metmmt -G. I Wvmwgw sift S. 1 SohIPftoomouivo E. I.dunrt bn•fue disoaMl la[diryl H. Other le.plain wlowl C. CJ Hvamms thaw doom.use F IedwnT Idi¢earg.w wr.. 1 IV. TYPE !Tc A. Eewag.,(.thee pumaurg sludget:agw rra wt on /ar E. I Aglwwl water I. Ines materialf edu[tN. a. Indu ,Pe F. F Ansme Pease J. Oath ammm Cl I Muni..Mid wan. G. CI Fgwft pwoun were K. rear o. 1 He .... nE H. Canftruttlrudemalinian weuq L Other le.oum wlpwl *Po FenCial for slug a die Deal in`che future but only after env ro mental ssessm nt 3 EIR in full sa[isfactidn of PCondit+ons of MOU between Orange Count' a �GitV 0f twin e(a ttached) . leTt p6sIGN CA.aUTY r ..u�u.v.uunv.a.'.note uwm+. u.. p.vvu ♦ Lour .e...as 1•tr.eery (OVER, 5104/88 EXCERPT from SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF IRVINE and THE COUNTY OF ORANGE REGARDING THE BEE CANYON LANDFILL "4. Refuse Composition and Toxicity: a. This Agreement supersedes Orange County Resolution No. 81-1106 to the extent that, not only sludge treatment, but also the drying, mixing or dumping of sludge will be prohibited, unless and until the County shall have fully complied with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect thereto, including but not limited to preparation of a new Environmental Assessment and Environmental Impact Report, with the City of Irvine serving as a responsible agency, and further provided that: (1) Any sludge dumped on the site shall be disposed of at a solid to liquid ratio of ten to one; (2) All sludge to be dumped will be treated so as to achieve a toxicity content no greater than other materials which may be lawfully disposed of in the landfill ; (3) The City of Irvine will receive copies of all toxicity reports on sludge to be disposed of on the site; and, (4) The operating agency will explore and implement technological advances as they develop so as to further reduce the hazards relating to sludge disposal an the site. (5) That any sludge dumped on the site will be counted in the daily tonnage limit stipulated in Section D.2. , below." 'IVNorth Irvine Villages Association Orange County Sanitation District July 18, 1988 P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attn: Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester Upon reviewing the attached memo from Mr. Paul Ireland to Mr. William Wollett (both of the City of Irvine) , it is felt that NIVA's position regarding the disposal of sewage sludge at the Bee Canyon landfill should be clarified. Niva is concerned about OCSD's request to indicate the potential for sewage sludge disposal on the RWQCB's application for Bee Canyon. Our main concerns are: o Sewage Sludge Odor o Heavy Metal Leachate The basis for these concerns are 1) the odor and leachate problems which exist/have existed at the Coyote Canyon landfill and 2) the cessation of sewage sludge dumping at the Olinda landfill, after odor problems resulted in numerous citizen complaints. Other concerns include: o Shorter Effective Dump Lifetime o Increased Road Deterioration o Increased Insect Problems o Increased Bird Problems o Leakage of Sludge/Liquids from Unlined/Poorly Sealed Trucks We appreciate you taking the time to meet with NIVA representatives on May 17, 1988. However, we feel that we are _nabl= tc eliminate the above concerns of our members, as _ result of the meeting. Therefore, the following is requested: o A copy of the study which analyzes the dumping/disposal/ reclamation alternatives available to the OCSD and the proposals and conclusions resulting from this analysis. o A Public Hearing in Irvine which would seek to address the public concerns of disposing of sewage .sludge in our neighborhood. Very truly yours, fjorth Irv�illages Assoc. i �..i �� Jim Frisbee President cc: Frank Bowerman Paul Ireland 4790 IR VINE BOULEVARD, SUI E 105 ; BOX 254 IRVIN E, CALIFORNIA 92720 NIVANorth Irvine Villaqes Association Bee Canyon Landfill Discussion July 13, 1988 The City as an Advocate Control & Trust City as an Inspector & Advocate City to Inspect Working Face Demand of Repayment of Costs Personnel Costs—Staff time Special Consultant Costs Establish base for 35 year history Reduction of Solid Wastes Only way to save wildlife resources such as Bee Canyon The County has no viable plan pull out the plastics industry as a corporate partner Sludge I No Sludge at Fee Canyon. Period. , j There is precedent { 'r,'hen & If the EPA waiver for ocean dumping is disallowed I then landfills will become prime alternatives. The Odor problem has been experienced and well ` documented by Irvine Residents adjacent to Coyote Canyon Landfill. Impact of Sludge? Sleight Variance of Trucks Takgs up room for Solid Waste What changes will be required to modify the operation? Disclosure of sludge dumping to new home buyers in N.I.? Septic tank pumpings? Could this hold up the opening of the Dump? What need can the Sanitation District show for this? Is the Sanitation District overburdened ? SAR4tOCB hEARINGS should be held in Irvine. OCSD. public hearing to demonstrate need for Bee Canyon. What are the alternative disposal methods for the Sanitation District? '-'hat are the odor & leachate problems that have been associated with Coyote Canyon Landfill and olinda Landfill in regards to sewage sludge disposal? Landscaping Aspects The present Access road . . .No discussion with N.N. residents Where is. the plan from the County. Lots of delays. 1790 IRVINE BOULEVARD, SUITE 105 ; BOX 254 1 RV INE, CALI FO R NIA 92720 r - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.Box 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272E-0127 IN"ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9270b7018 (714)9E2-2411 August 9, 1988 HAND DELIVERED Mr. R. A. Scott _ Director General Services Agency County of Orange 14 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Subject: RWQCB Permit Application for Bee Canyon Landfill Dear Bert: It has come to our attention that you are considering amending the County's previously submitted application to the Regional water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for a permit for Bee Canyon LdndfiTI , to delete the check in the box that indicated the potential for future sludge disposal. We respectfully request that you delay any action on amending the permit application pending an opportunity for the various interested and affected parties to meet and resolve some apparent misunderstandings over the issue. As you know, the County's Waste Management Office, after a May 17th meeting and agreement with representatives of the Districts, the City of Irvine and the North Irvine Villages Association (NIVA), filed an "Application for Facility Permit/Waste Discharge", Form 200, with the RWQCB for Bee Canyon Landfill , with a •check in Box IV.A. (at our request) indicating the potential for sludge disposal in the future. We further requested that the application carry the notation that such disposal would be only after completion of an environmental assessment and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in full satisfaction of the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding between the County and the City of Irvine regarding Bee Canyon Landfill (see attached). Apparently, NIVA and some City officials now have reservations over this ministerial action and have requested that your office amend the application to delete this item. However, based on recent discussions and correspondence, it appears as if the expressed concerns of NIVA and City officials are based on a misunderstanding or misinformation. Clearly, checking Box IV.A. is not a request for disposal of sludge at Bee Canyon, but, rather, to indicate that the future potential is there as set forth in the MOU so that the RWQCB wi 11 take that into account when considering the .permit for Bee Canyon. If sludge disposal is proposed at some time in the future, it would be only after completion of an environmental assessment and an EIR in full compliance with the terms and conditions of the MOU. We have fully supported the MOU provisions and our request to the County is consistent with the spirit and letter of the Memorandum of Understanding. As you are well aware, the Districts are continuing to pursue other disposal alternatives. As one example, we have executed contracts with several private firms for recycling sludge. Almost one-half of our sludge is now being recycled for COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA August 9, 1988 1081 EW5 AVENUE Mr. R. A. Scott Ro.Box 81E7 General Services Agency FOUNTAIN VALLEY.C UFORNa EP728­B127 Page Two 01.1 B824.11 beneficial use. Although we have no immediate plans to propose sludge disposal at Bee, if for no other reason, a landfill back-up disposal option is needed in case other disposal and reuse alternatives disappear. Historically, landfill disposal has proven to be the most economical and reliable method. It is for these reasons that the Districts requested that the County, when applying for an operating permit from the RWQCB for Bee Canyon Landfill , check the box on the permit application indicating the potential for future sewage sludge disposal . It is intended to assure that the Regional Water Quality Control Board will consider the operating permit in a manner so as not to preclude sludge disposal at Bee Canyon should it be proposed and approved some time in the future if the MOU provisions are satisfied; and require its construction in an environmentally sound manner in accordance with the latest technology. It would be in the best interests of the residents of Irvine, with or without sludge. If the County proceeds as proposed by the Districts, we have offered to provide funding assistance for the construction of the Bee Canyon Landfill to assure that these goals are achieved. It is worth noting that a major consideration by the Sanitation Districts' Boards of Directors in agreeing to form new County Sanitation District 14 to serve the Irvine community was based largely upon recognition of the benefits to the community of Irvine of allowing for the conveyance of sewage and industrial waste from Irvine to the Districts' regional treatment and disposal facilities in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach, and the reciprocal benefit to the Orange County community-at-large of the ability to co-dispose of the community's wastewater residuals at Irvine's landfills, if needed. In furtherance of that philosophy, the Sanitation Districts' Boards of Directors, since approving formation of District 14, have also authorized acceptance of sludge from the Irvine wastewater treatment plant to the Sanitation Districts' ,joint treatment and disposal facilities. Certainly, this exemplifies the cooperative 'spirit that prevails between our respective agencies that helps enable us to best serve the interests of Orange County' s citizens. Let me reassure you that we are very sensitive to the need for Bee Canyon to proceed on schedule and we will not impede that in any way. Toward that end, it seems in the best interest of all affected parties and their respective constituents to meet further and hopefully resolve this matter bef a considering a change in course. n r#1y . WayesterG neraer JWS:sc Attachment cc: Board Members Mr. Frank Bowerman, Director and Chief Engineer, Waste Management Program Mr. William Woollett, Jr. , City Manager, Irvine . 0.A SCOTT .. CID ucrvc cEnrFAvww,,wsr c�ooa S TA/iMA G9ZlptW,] l 1E1EP110ME.1]1,18LSSfO County of Orange GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY August 16, 1988 Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Wayne: SUBJECT: RWQCB PERMIT APPLICATION FOR BEE CANYON LANDFILL After careful consideration, I have determined to withdraw the check from Box IV. A. on the 'Application for Facility Permit/Waste Discharge", Form 200, for the Bee Canyon Landfill. That check mark indicated that the disposal of digested sewage sludge at the Bee Canyon Landfill would be done subsequent to the successful completion of an environmental impact report (EIR), in full satisfaction of the terms and conditions of a Memorandum of Understanding ' (MOU) between the County and the City of Irvine. My decision to rescind that request for consideration at this time is because it is imperative that the Bee Canyon landfill be implemented in a timely manner. It is our intent to pursue that goal as a primary objective; the issue of digested sewage sludge disposal would be considered under the terms of the MOU at the time that the County Sanitation Districts determines that it is appropriate to proceed with an EIR. Please be assured of our continued desire to be supportive of you in your pursuit of suitable procedures for the disposal of digested sewage sludge. I believe it is of primary importance to proceed with the opening of Bee Canyon in March of 1989, as planned. Sincerely, R. A. Scott, Director General Services Agency FRB:sma cc: James R. Bennett, California Regional Water Quality Control Board William Woollett, Jr., City of Irvine Paul Brady, City of Irvine Charlene Gallina, City of Irvine Frank R. Bowerman, GSA/Waste Management Program R.A.SCOV 11,11*1 General Service9 Agency Z��OUNTY OF ORANGE FUNK SOWEOMAN Director 3 Chief En ineer �5 �3 GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY K.WILUAM KIRKWOOD Assistant Olrector WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 12M N.Main St.,Suite M Santa Ana,Callfamla 92101 R14l 80 8100 August 16, 1988 James R. Bennett Executive Officer - California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region 6809 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92506 Dear Jim: This is to confirm my telephone discussion with you on August 16, 1988 regarding an amendment to the "Application for Facility Permit/Waste Discharge", Form 200, dated July 11 , 1988, for the Bee Canyon Landfill . This request for amendment is to remove the check from the Box, IV. A. , indicating the potential for digested sewage sludge disposal . It is not our intent to pursue the application under that condition at this time. , Best personal regards. Sincerely, Frank Frank R. Bowerman Director & Chief Engineer GSA/Waste Management Program FRB:sma cc: R. A. Scott, General Services Agency William Woollett, Jr. , City of Irvine Paul Brady, City of Irvine Charlie Gallina, City of Irvine c-Wayhe Sylvester, Orange County Sanitation Districts `.i GSA/WMP/3351FRB l..✓ AUGUST 23, 1988 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: MANAGER OF PLANNING SERVICES FOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF'AUGUST 23, 1988 SUBJECT: BEE CANYON LANDFILL - STATUS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Receive staff report. 2. Council discussion and questions. 3. Direct staff to: Continue monitoring, at the current level of participation, the implementation of the 1984 Settlement Agreement for Bee Canyon Landfill to ensure that the proposed landfill will be constructed and operated in an environmentally safe manner acceptable to the City of Irvine. OR Direct staff to increase the monitoring activities relative to the implementation of the 1984 Settlement Agreement for Bee Canyon Landfill to ensure that the proposed Landfill will be constructed and operated in an environmentally safe manner acceptable to the City of Irvine. ISSUE: Should the City Council direct staff to continue monitoring, at the current level of participation, the construction and operation of Bee Canyon Sanitary Landfill? Should the City Council direct staff to increase the monitoring activities relative to the construction and operation of Bee Canyon Sanitary Landfill? (See Location Map, Attachment 1). HISTORY: On August 1, 1984, the City of Irvine and the County of Orange entered into a Settle- ment Agreement to resolve litigation between the City and County over the proposed Bee Canyon Landfill (Attachment 2). The Settlement Agreement created a binding agreement with respect to the construction and operation of the Bee Canyon Landfill and other matters of mutual concern by stipulating additional limitations and controls to be . implemented at the time of construction and operation of the Bee Canyon Landfill. On June 7, 1988, the County of Orange Planning Commission unanimously voted to approve Use Permit 87-23P and recertify final EIR 018 and Addendum IP 87-026. The Use Permit allows the General Services Agency (GSA) to commence development and operation of 6HH211-03/CDD(3) 7-/ City Council August 23, 1988 - Page 2 Bee Canyon Sanitary Landfill to serve as the replacement site for Coyote Canyon Landfill, which is scheduled to closed in 1989. All conditions identified in the 1984 Settlement Agreement were addressed and Incorporated into the Use Permit and EIR Addendum (Attachment 3). On July 20, 19889 staff met with Mayor Agran, Councilman Dornan, and several representatives from the North Irvine Villages Association (NIVA) to discuss the level of monitoring activities associated with the' implementation of the 1984 Settlement Agreement. As a result of this meeting, the City Manager's office directed staff to assess the progress on monitoring the construction and operation activities of Bee Canyon Landfill and to determine whether additional staffing and technical resources are warranted to ensure that the Settlement Agreement is adequately implemented. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: Issue 1: Settlement Agreement Assessment Attachment 4 provides an assessment of the conditions included in the 1984 Settlement Agreement. The purpose of this assessment is to determine whether the County of Orange is in compliance with the Settlement Agreement and to ensure that Bee Canyon Landfill is constructed and operated in an environmentally safe manner acceptable to the City of Irvine. Issue 2: Staff Allocation Levels To date,'staff has been actively monitoring activities associated with Bee Canyon Landfill, attending monthly meetings of the Waste Management Commission, reviewing and commenting on environmental documents, technical studies, and has engaged in discussions with County staff involved in the construction and operation of Bee Canyon Landfill. However, due to limited staff, the City has not been as fully involved as possible. Specifically, staff has not attended county meetings with other regulatory agencies, consultants, refuse service operators, etc. The present level of activity is based upon the Planning Services Division 1988-1989 Budget which only allocates approximately 1,000 hours towards monitoring, not only the Bee Canyon Landfill Settlement Agreement, but also Coyote Canyon Landfill operation and closure (September 1989) and revision of the 1985 County Solid Waste Management Plan (February 1989). Currently, staff time is fully committed to this and other City Council priority items. Any reallocation of existing staff.would adversely impact those items. If Council desires to increase the level of staff activities relative to the Bee Canyon Landfill, then it is recommended that additional staff be retained. BUDGETIMPACT: The 1988-89 Budget and Work Program for the Planning Services Division allocates .60 staff to monitor solid waste issues such as Coyote Canyon Landfill, Bee Canyon Landfill, and the 1985 County Solid Waste Management Plan revision. If the City Council increases activity on Bee Canyon Landfill, additional funding to secure staff or retain consultant services would need to be further analyzed. 6HH2i 1-03/CDD(3) City Council August 23, 1988 _ Page-3 CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to continue monitoring the construction and operation of Bee Canyon Sanitary Landfill to ensure compliance with the 1984 Settlement Agreement. Prepared by: Charlene Gallina, Senior Planner Submi Approved by: PA IR LAND `-R'fI.LIAM WbbGL , J Manager of Planning Services City Manager PI/CG:lk Attachments. 1. Vicinity Map 2. 1984 Settlement Agreement 3. Orange County Planning Commission Reso. No. 88-51 & 88-52 (Use Permit 87-23P) 4. 1984 Settlement Agreement Assessment cc: Jim Frisbee, NIVA, 5 W. Trenton, Irvine, CA 92720 Diana Von Borries 23 Terra Cline, Irvine, CA 92720 Joe Belles 800 N. Eckhoff Street, Orange, CA 92613 Gen Guilano 5 E. Delamesa, Irvine, CA 92720 Hal Maloney 141 West Remington, Irvine, CA 92720 Frank Bowerman, Director of Waste Management Program, General Services Agency 1200 N. Main St., Suite 206, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Tom Wright, GSA 1200 N. Main St., Suite 206, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 " Flies: 87-GS-0163 General 6HH211-03/CDD(3) -'"; (EXCERPT) 4. Refuse Comoosition and Toxicity: a. "This Agreement supersedes Orange County Resolution No. 81-1106 to the extent that, not only sludge treatment, but also the drying, mixing or dumping of sludge will be prohibited, unless and until the County shall have fully complied with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect thereto, including but not limited to preparation of a new Environmental Assessment and Environmental Impact Report, with the City of Irvine serving as a responsible agency, and further provided that: (1) Any Sludge dumped on the site shall be disposed of at a solid to liquid ratio of ten to one; (2) All sludge to be dumped will be treated so as to achieve a toxicity content no greater than other materials which may be lawfully disposed of in the landfill; (3) The City of Irvine will receive copies of all toxicity reports on sludge to be disposed of on the site; and, (4) The operating agency will explore and implement technological advances as they develop so as to further reduce the hazards relating to sludge disposal on the site. (5) That any sludge dumped on the site will be counted in the daily tonnage limit stipulated in Section D.2., below." Intent of Condition - Condition was imposed to ensure that sewage sludge was not disposed at Bee Canyon Landfill prior to completion a new environmental assessment and EIR. Compliance Activities to Date - On July 11, 1988, the County GSA submitted an application for a waste discharge permit to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). On this application, GSA indicated the potential for sewage sludge disposal. According to GSA, this application is not a request for sludge disposal, but rather to indicate that the future potential is there as set forth in the Settlement Agreement between the City and County of Orange, so that the RWQCB will take this issue into account when considering the permit for Bee Canyon (Exhibit 4). On July 20, 1988, staff met with Mayor Agran, Councilman Dornan, and several representatives from the North Irvine Villages Association (NIVA) to discuss the implication of the sewage sludge notation on the RWQCB Waste Discharge Permit application. At this meeting, NIVA expressed concerns with sewage sludge disposal in the Bee Canyon Landfill and stated that the County would be violating the terms of the Settlement Agreement if RWQCB issued the Waste Discharge Rermit. NIVA requested the City to investigate this action and to develop an action plan to counter the sewage sludge proposal. On August 4, 1988, staff met with Frank Bowerman and Tom Wright of GSA and Wayne Sylvester of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) to discuss the RWQCB application for a Waste Discharge Permit and NIVA's concerns. At this meeting, Mr. Bowerman and Mr. Sylvester indicated that they fully supported the provisions of the Settlement Agreement and acknowledged the concerns of NIVA. By denoting the potential for sewage sludge disposal, it was the County's intent to have the RWQCB• consider the operating permit in a manner so as not to preclude sludge disposal should it be proposed and approved some time in the future after Settlement agreement provisions were satisfied; and to request its construction in an environmentally sound manner. This action was considered to be in the best interest of the City, with or without sludge. In response to the County's action and NEVA's concerns, staff requested that the County seriously consider revising the RWQCB Waste Discharge Permit application to delete the notation that sewage sludge disposal is a potential at Bee Canyon landfill. On August 9, 1988, Mr. Bowerman informed staff that the County agreed to revise the RWQCB Waste Discharge Permit application deleting the sewage sludge notation. Staff will be closely monitor this decision to ensure that the County submits a revised application. � � 1 'ate' RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. F lk0 '1'• JT LIST WORKING CAPITAL FPOCSSSING DATE 7/2P/PP P.JE 1 ■!/ ^ 4 SSCCRT HU"E0 AP43 ,h D ._.._ _ __.. ..... _ ._ .. _ .... CLAIMS:PAI:TIA/.3/SLP ItI9_➢f�LBE'1LLCLDt.iT CLtl N3 PAID rP/-3/P9 F+ x YAMA �o ____TENROP _ .._ . ___.ASNNNI__ ___._.__ P9402 KRA CLEAN S144.22 CLEANING SUPPLIES .._._1-4:;1 . ... PCP. EeAPEPv CO. 044094 ACTION INSTPUMENTS. INC. $532.56 1'LVISMIITCR C94695 ADAE30k IN01TSTRICS. INC. 1547.91 SAFETY LIGHTS ._JP!694. . .. . . ._ .A9VF4C9_C9PSTRUCTCQS. I9CL S2AS17F 321d!_ ... .___._. rnNs70nrnON -15 __ ]94:97 AIF COLD SUFFLY II.C. 1125J4S ELECTRONIC PUTS 49169t ALFA-LAVAL. INC. $2.731.16 MECHUICN. PUTS _AL.LLCD SOPF.0PAT1ON ._. ... . . ..._.W.Gu.2C__... �991]U ALLIED SUPPLY CO. E1.314.83 C160RIIUTION PUTS 044101 ALL FURE CHEMICAL 533.622.SJ CHLORINE N.O. 10-14-87 _ C•9411 e, _CITY OF ASPI'C IN_ _3197L96L57..___ CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DA. :441 3 ANAnE1M SEWER CONSTRUCTION SSTI.JC WASTEWATER SAMPLE '- m 194101 THE ANCNO0. FLCRIN6 CO. S2.2'I.82 HARDWARE 2 _ y911O5 _ . APCQ Y­L9E._!, fP. P. COPE _._ . ._ f7Z7.5L vA1 V85 p 09410 :PLUS SYSTEPS f2,713.82 PERSONNEL ADS n C94147 APPLE ONE S357.10 TEMPoRUY SERVICES ..- :9-IOh _ _AAIZONA INSTEl. A[NTAMPRF.PUTS __ •µ :1111, LIS OCIA INS TPURENI S6l]JS INSTRUMENT PUTS j G9111. ASS OC]AiEE LA P.DP AT7F IES fNn.:: LAB sC3VICCs ., j . . .9994112 . _ AUTOMOBILE CLUEESALE ELELTFIC _ __$491.77 _ ___ R•FUNDCER FEEBO .. . u 0941113 AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SO.0 AI If. 1491.27 TRAILER USER PER OV[VASN[IR 094113 AYNIN6 MASTERS S4fi2.27 WAILER PUT 00 _._4941.1.4, _ _P.N. e.,O13F0S AL 'Assoc. -_s25.5!).56 _._ ._ CONSTRUCTION HU_1031=86.__ .____ . ____. 69411E V.L. BEMO TTI AAO ASSOC. H.I3T.J0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-36.Pl-06.P3-33fi34 P9411h e. F.E TENLN f535.:C DEFERRED COMP DISSRIBUTION _4413T , _ eSET EP .E6LTMCARL {neF. , __. .....MS.A __. . _aPlilt✓D-•5QB3ECJIYEHPAYNENI' _____ r C94 j]L - 6AATU SCIFATIFIC FFODUCTS $766.21 LAS SUPPLIES ]94)c BEACON BAY FNTEP.FPIFFS, INC. S62.3: CAR WASH SERVICES G )94120 PCNZ ENGINEERING. INC. _. .123.86 :941i1 COLS' RADIATOR SCFVICE 5752.6J RADIATOR REPAIR Cl) :44122 60A-'.RUES SSS.h: TRUCK PUTS A _ _JS41P2 _ 2OUZY ROUSE CAPE _. _ J1W.1.29. _._UfNffR_U= FEE.9YERPAYNENi C94224 ERCYN 4 CALCWELL 3623.): LAB SERVICES Cf 194125 ERG i1I 4 CALDWELL COkSULTINE S23.647.26 ENGINEERING SERVICES US 88-57 09417f PUILOING NEW'. INC. -. _. ...N 4.25 --WWI" ATIQN CA - :91i.? TnC LU04E COMPANY S341.51 "MAKE T9112. GAR T S. STF EEG 1415.29 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 19112- _ _ __CS COMPANY 94 USF CAL -GLASS FOP PESiARC" INC. S2.534.46 LAB SUPPLIES 394131 CALLY CURTIS CO. S49.71 PUBLICATION J94132 CNIOLLO-BDTAR.A JOINT VENTURE .. 3152.3.4.53 __.__...�YtlDEHENPINS.SERVIQE$ R$S 07-13I m.P423' :EMTURT SAFETY INST. A 1UF7. $922.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES L9413. CENTWFT HH(FL ) PIx 1335.39 VEHICLE PARTS _.94135 CHF•WCST 1kC. ... _111R.E4 A9423F C..RWEST INDUSTPIFS. VIC. SI)0.415.71 FERRIC CHLORIDE N.O. 11-18-87 4f415T CN.VFON U.S.L., II.C. 10.06.92 PSTROLEUM PRODUCTS D MI- x FUNC VO 4114 JT FIST JC9MIN6 C"ITAL FPOCESSING GATE 7/29/PP -AGE .. 4 PEFORT I:UF=EP AP43 'n .. .. CDUN.TVJAI:ITATIOn ES SIEIL.IS.SF_DBAMGLGGIl6LTr —_—__._ .. . ____ N GRAINS SLID '}/.W5F , 3 .__YIRIA NT_MO•_.._...-- ._._. _._YC NDOP 9•1.3t CN=ISTEVL COP-. S215,495.15 --_--_. _ _— CONSTRUCTION 11-16, 11-10-3R _ i13?. ___.. . .. CLEMENT T EOMLT'ItTSMUNICA ... .. _ . .J. __ ... .__ __., ._.._SONSULFSNc_SIFY1¢5@-FhR9'¢ICA44eMeMTiox 394141 CLEMENT COMNUN1C Ail DNS. INC. 615.95 SAF6TY SUPPLIES J94141 COAST AUTOMATIC ELECTRICAL 4612.9E AUTIMIO[IV8 REPAIR _ . li4lu94.4; _.. CO63DLINILG ELECTRICAL GIST, __ lt.?]2..1T_. RINE -194144 R.CONTINENTAL R CRANE CO $2.6.2.73 CHLORIN[ N.O.13-10-86 -ULM5 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL S2$An.17 CLANG REMITTAL _ __.. C9411?..._.._. ....CO.LNI Nk TV TTM,alF334� FLE£TRIC .. ... ..__..i61.1T_ __.._-.—_- RRALic EQUIPMENT ..___.—_ C94146 CAL YA TEA 512J.00 SLOGS REMOVALM L94141 CARRY CUP TI TRUCK , i 6 EDOf. GENT fRq,i`71.05 SLOGS REMOVAL M.O. E-l3-BB y . _S-412'._ _. _._. DANIE .$ IREI F. ALE.*_..Of. eeN. _ _ _ ..9635.i:� TIMES rn J44149 OCNIELS TIFF SCR VICE f141.66 TIRED fT1 `9435:: CEC 0 491.6E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES POST..OP.__. n ;9q]SE DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 5199.2E PRINTING 094151 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. 5345.4J SERVICE AGREEMENT ui Fy _AY 154 _. _ _O1S,PQBT!NL E.JU eI¢ 53.8_TIAS. II.C. .. ._... ._._—LS3LAZ MECHANICAL PARTS •u :9415^ DORADO ENTEPPRISES, INC. $05.552.11 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS EFI 94156 EUI!L E9 YAFOS CORP. 6641.'IS PAINT SUPPLIES 3 : 9L15] E.I.L. IN STRUMS NTb ,1 NC. TNSTURI T49PPUE3. rx C9415b EINCO FROCCES CQUIF. CO. S1.b44.62 MECHANICAL SERVICES 594159 LASTMAN, INC. S1,253.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES „_, 4f416J 4.. x, E.PERI. SA9F• I J44161 JEFF ESOEF S94.2t EMPLOYEE MILEAGE D '94162 MAPSNALL FAIPRES S33J. 'o DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ..JJ:.N r J9NH FAPA SALES Y SERVICE /65.CP ELECTRIC PARTS :9.165 FCDARAL EXPRESS CORn , 4314.5V AIR FREIGHT p _._ Y941E6 FISCMEP R FORTCR CO. .._ 4238.17 -144167 FISHEP SCIELTIFIC Cn, 4225.1E LAB SUPPLIES N L941f3 FLFT S VEPTICAL CCNCRETF 1222..i CORE DRILLING A . .._.._i"I" FLC SYSTEMS S)S.LiE- __._. ..__.. _19NANICAL PARTS__._.._—_.. _.— .. _ ..._.__-�. . 09411J GELGEN PUMFS, INC. S645.21 Pump PARTS n 094111 FOOTHILL ENGINE A EQUIPMENT CO 127.00.0: BELL DRILLING H.O. 6-18-88 N199112 „ -.,CITY OF rOUNlA1N VALLEY 513.416.CA„ I.wdp,PU9S11A3S.N.0.7:13-¢8_y9.113 FOUMTLI•I VALLEY PSTVT f64S.-:4 PAINT SUPPLIES :94174 GOAALC L. FIR 6 AFS)CILTFS 61.A25.;u CONSULTING SERVICES 554115 1YC /CX Fa JFG CO. ..... L9.¢7P2. _.. . . .___ I_ _QHWL§UPPL1ES - .. L 941Tfi GANAML LUMPE4 CO. 41,J25.11 BUILDING SUPPLIES 094177 SATES FIBEPGLASS INSTALLLAS S441.JC FIBERGLASS REPAIR ., :94178 -GENEAAL TELEFMUNE Co' , 42.d35.17 ,94:79 GEOPGE LF.ECF G ASSOCIATES S3,u38.8V E.ECTPIC PART :9416J COULD 14C. S546.)6 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS .0.1.1 _ GREET LINES .•VORAULICf _.92A2.91. ._ _ -. CONTROL,PART —. - ... . . .. .- .....__:" uS.'.e2 6011,6ELL CORPORATION 14.734.50 VALVES .94153 F4ED A. nLFK9 SIA63.;J WEARIES COMP DISTRIBUTION 1 N fuhr I.e -I!Q JT ^1ST VTPMIM: C:FITAL Px OCESSING DATE 7/2P/6F as 6E a PEPOAT N4MSFA AF93 C-AftoE1L'LNSL . . W CLAIMS YAIC ;6/c3/80 x VARRA NI N n[cWe.an nu • J941F4 NAJCP L KIRK. INC. $5,713.41 I000NANI= FARTS :9A 1l5 iNGFMF6iili�{a. 90 ._-91166 _._.__._ S. i.' rWO LY CO. . .. 3239.:61.67 -. COXStHVCTION PI-23H 094167 MOCKER CANC-1 STOKES 226.75 BATTERIES 9R0A,pU6ryES cqA INC. . }L eP7.72..._._ CITY OF MURTIN6TOk EEFCP S16.5. WATER USEAGE 194190 eUNTIhG7ON BEACH PURSER STAW S369.A1 RUBBER STAMPS 694191 _______.UNTINRTON fgtPST _ _ t15.eS NAROVAAE '9.j92 NTRLCYE LE CtRONICS. INC. f722.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 09.19E [CC INSTRUMENT $61.29 METER REPAIR _ J941^9_ I.NMA[. 'D,Y :9I 195 iNL EF EN DENT CRPLCPATIOk 1216.74 REFUND USER PEE OV132AYMENT m E941PA INDEFEMDERT FOPGE CO. $4.911.31 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT :9N97___ IACUSMUL_IEF_T_COa. .._ _.. . .. ._i111.R1_.___...__._ PUBLICATIONS Z ....___ _ p 094199 -INDUSTRIAL IIL RMMFNDED PRODUCTS flB9.l9 FITTINGS n 099199 IMF tLCO OE6pEMOML INC. $394.924.68 BAR SCREENS SPEC E-178 RIVIEE RAJFINAN rj4Mg9LP¢r__ 317.u1D_. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES E QYIERA FINANCE - f312.N. JAXITORIN. SUPPLIES In 1942C2 JONES B STORES ASSOC..I4C. $1.635.76 CONSULTING SERVICES RER 88-27 g.IENIIFIC 1'.SIAUPENTS CC ..._.F31L EiJ_M_]OEELICS L94204 MAHAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY f139.5I FITTINGS ' +� 094245 RAS SAFETY PRODUCTS $151.24 SAFETY SHOES 00 _____.Y91226_ _ MIENIT PACIFIC CO. S.I"91.9J6.E3.._. _SOtlS]'WCTION_PM-2D W 094247 KILO FEARING. INC. $1.113.15 BEARINGS/MACHINE SUPPLIER -- -- :9.2.6 CON.LD E. MINNEY fd15.2L DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION PP. `APTIx NOICM. Sq. _.._SSAALI. C___.__-___INSPFCll41LEERVSC6S1_SbL5-1L.... r r9.21t LEE . R O COMDNSULT V•4 EkGP. S53.719.:: ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33 :542I1 Lif ECOP.SAFEIV SEFVICE SUPPLY S299.8C CYLINDER REPAIRS T7 _IS4212 _ MAY _02.51__._... 39.11] Y.a1M Fr OTO 1175.4• FILM CA 19A214 PALC4LK PIRNIE . I4C. 11i.196.43 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-20 --1 :99215 ..MATT -.Ca LCP. INC. _ _._FAA ::S.]R 90FUN IRSTiUMENTS _ 5315.94 MINTENANCE CONTRACT ("t .94217 YCOAPPY CENTRAL TYPEVRITEP INC %I.N:.Co SERVICE AGREEMEMYS 1,94916 _ , . PEOLIN„COMP OLS CO. .. _. . _. ...}}4'a.x_ _-_-INSTRUNEHT_SllPPISLi._-.-.._ CO F9.Pl• Mf.6A COnSOLIDAICC NATEP S6.IC HATER USEAGE ..94221 PIC-1 43TION S266.61 FIRINGS _C5AE21 _ ILLE95. PPINTEFY E 9A xi2 MIME SAFETY ApFLIANCES CO. i1.662.42 SAFETY SUPPLIES s9223 PLACER BUNTICM COI.STRL'CTION CC 1249095.35 CONSTRUCTION 3-28R-I ' L94224 _ MOPiT2 FGUNCR 7, __._..S5.gL9.[V __........__-INNHOLE-OVER.- .__.....__... _ E9A225 MOTION TNDUSTPtES. TNT. $491.91 PITTING 494226 NOTSROLA CELLULAR SENViers 597.:4 MOBILE PHONES .. 94227 _ NATICIIAL.,LUMP41 OfV2F - NATIONAL PLANT SEPVI CC$. RAT. fe25.:J PLANS MINTEXAC6 6 REPAIRS 19.229 HELL SUPPLY CC. $596.51 HARDWARE D W x FUND NO 9199 - JT CAST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINR DATE 712P/88 PAGE 4 REPORT NURSER IF43 D ._�.._.._. . .. - ._ . .. ._ ..._C!lUATV SIN1TITICO SJST.AICTS_DLDB.ANGE_CDUMIJ_ I CLA VS 9010 -8113/4S t WAFRINT NO• ._� YEHDOR . _... .. AgOUNT C9423] NEELY P. WALKF4. INC. 462.41 AUTO REPAIR UYI TI'0 UOTTIN4NAn 71e232 - - G.N.S. f1.H93.!0 TRAIN BIN REMOVAL ^.94233 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICAS 5199.96 SAFETY GLASSES 39.. _ _.,. . CBAYGC COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLI _ 171.33 .__ ..._... nFcrf+cSI@PL[ES_ Z94235 9A4.IGC COUNTY FAPP SUPPLY C6. 577.3i LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES :94236 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. 1227.:5 LAB SUPPLIG _. ..OACAP-S_.LQCM 1..9AFI _. .. . ... ..119.3E-... _. STUCK rAHE ______ G94238 COUNTY OF ORANGE 5913.94 CONSULTING SERVICES 7-10 391239 COUNTY OF ORANGE Sb.bGL.32 SURVEYING/MAPPING 994,24q __.. .0414TT.SANITATION DISTINCT . . ..._. . _..$91.f1__.-.___-_ffiLOvry xrl+Tu PL_+RUTION 94241 ORANGE CO.' FLOOD CONTROL DIST. t528.b46.25 CONSTRUCTION W0.0 6-12-87 M1I 094242 PSG SEWER SERVICES, INC. 527.314.39 SUER CCTV Z. ._..__. ."94 2A3 .. .. . . ....9>CIFIC,[AC CT AJ C.. INC'. __TA1.115.d_ .__..__. COM9TRUCTLULl-ib- _._.___....___.. 7 094244 PACIFIC PARTS $63.11 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES n •• 094249 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT _ •' _. -- C_ _ _.. _ 5715.39 SAFETY SMELTER094A46 ---„ AACIFC .9CNEA.NAIATCNANCECORc 7.968 - _ ENrac.eAw7uc ._ ___u94E41 PACIFIC o BELL fS63.11 TELEPHONE - .'o � 094240 PACTEL CELLULAR 363.3E TELEPHONE SERVICE rCl y4249 NAd TB, FN _ N .942B6 .. ._.__._. . ._ LYMITE.1 NG CANF ONv _..31,155..i._____ ._... AlrOONOTIVE J942!1 PARTS UNLTNITEC f1$435. 30 AUTOMOTIVE PARE X 994E01 ROM FEN PETERSON S43S.J0 0¢PEPBED COMP DISTRIBUTION .v 1 ., M]942!E P4M_W• PSOUND N { ASSOC. OFFICE MACHPPv4+CPv.1-.1L-1._____ '-• 0942!3 FHUTO C SOUSE CO. iS72.F0 JANITORIAL MACHINE REPAIR :942!9 PICRVIAD SFA-ERYSTE 31E.GP JANITORIAL SUPPLI83 - y _ . 9o2r. , . ., PIA,A GR0 5Y9TC NS. INC. .. _. .J 36....]5.&1 ____..31.ODGE_SEtlOVdLtl•O. 5-11-88 ........ r 994 E56 POWER HOUSE FORD ENGINES S352.0P AUTOMOTIVE PARTS n94257 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $60.00 ICE 0025P. PRINCETON TYPESETTING SA32.92. _. _ ___ YYPESETLIBCi__. _.. C94P59 THE FRCJECTS SOLUYIDN CO. 43.761.:4 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION N 094260 PUL3AFECDER 1437.11 PUMP PARTS -t 194261 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. .. 1294.1E w n94262 GUEST DATA SYSTEMS. INC. 1416.!2 TRAINING ' f'Y 094263 ING ENGINEERING. INC. t9.00.[5 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20 -1 „ _ 094264 41TTRAY AND ASSOCIATES. INC. ... 5130.90. __ENOINEP.BING.9GEIC68_. .... In R9a763 PE REMOVAL CYC. INC. 567.260.:. SLUDGE ROVAL M.0.2-10-88 .:9A266 REO WIND SHGES $211.96 GPETY SHOW C942f T_ _ _. M.R. REED ELECTRIC .,13..311,36 0942 CP REMEDY TEMP S1N56.b3 TENORARY SERVICE .94269 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM 33.J30.60 POSTAGE U9427J THE FEPUBLIC SUFFLY CO. _ t1.3l1.19 09A271 RICHAP CS. WATSON, CREYFU55 112.9:2.02 EERI SERVICES RIGOR CORPORATION t1.320,•:i DOPIER R LGSW _ _594273 ROEExi 6. MUST CC. _ tt.9.lE.!0. ._ _ __......._._INBPECS30N-PEWRW8I9B PAIR[CATOW :94 274 - POE INNOJD MOTEL $321.63 RRNPO USER FEE OVERPAYMENT C942f8 P0[•INSON FEvTILIZLP CC. 91"40.59 INSECTICIDE 47 % F FUME 1 •199 - JS !MST NJP VINO CAPITAL FFGCESSIN6 CUE 7126/ds PART FEPORT NUM?EK AF43 ' •` n _.. CCUNT'.Gml7s7ISN VI CLAIMS FAIT. 'P/.:3/AB WARRANT, NO. VENDOR _. , _ _ . 41f0,UHT ..--__ ...... _.....--J1ESD31F iinu A54276 RUSTIC INN S96.J8 REPUTED USER FEE OVEEPAYXEHI' _ 1-4777 RVAN-nERCO _ $517.;1 PUMP PABTS _------- ' 39A2TR - JOSEPH T. FYERSON 6 50N• INC. $571.2fi ST¢T1: 194279 SCIENCJECOAST APPLICATIONS INT•L 319A::7.85 OCPACE.E!BHIC RESEARCH X.O. 6-10-6] 1942BR _. SEA COt ST DESIGNS _ _ 421.1`.. _ __.-aLPIC¢._WUIPNIX[_. - - 6542E1 SIERRA INDUSTRIES SUPPLY SS53.5c TOOLS 19428! SIEPRA ftl•453.5C XBCHANICAL PA8T8 994283 ___ Sk AP-ON TOOLS_ COP CORP. s5s5.1._.___..____ TOOLS C942S4 SOIL AND TESTING -NGIVISONECC. .936.41 SOIL TESTING 4942P5 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CC. f487.93E.U1 POWER ?94'8? _._ _.. SO. CALIF. EUISON CO. s4s'.2S.._....__.__-- ELECTRICAL SUPPLB$.CU[bfj n 3912RT SO.SOUTHERN C TPARE FERMI CF N54.i1 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES nT 39428E SOUTMERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 37.719.a9 DIESEL NEL ` n _a^4?F4 _SFtRFLC TTS OPINNIGti W ET EP 1 .45 WATER _ _ 1 . $532.69 DRIVER TESTING G54291 STA000 STEEL fI44.lE MEFA6 _. d94292 _ .._ _ STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. _ _ _ ,. _ ._ -_13IIe 2."_._-.__ WARUXARE/TODLS _ C54213 SUFMCO. INC. 1I13.F2 LAB SUPPLIES ITS .9.294 SURER ICE CORP. $126.51 ICE -�• ,394295 THE SUPPLIERS_ ,_ 34P 09125E TARGET $53.36 SIGNS p 094291 Cx ARLES E. iHO8 45 12.336.40 IWSTRUI¢NTS .. _ D9129E TH.rE H AEPA1R SE?VICES _ _.FES.eNk._._._._.-____- OPPICB SUPPLIES I .9424' TO'1V•S LOCK d SAFE SERVICE 5273.96 SECURITY ic433: IXO CELAVAL IMC. 51.216.71 M!¢CNANICAL PARTS L'�43z:1 _ TRAVEL TRAVEL ,R,9l.il. .._.__ TMVEL 5¢RVIC65_, ' _ _ _ -- ' . _.._._.._.._.- I- i9L[2 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY. 19C. 073.76 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS G 94393 J.G. TUCKER 6 SON. INC. 5716.34 HIS CELLS 0 694IC4 CITY OF TUSTNN _. . 1275.21 _ _ NATBe,YQPAGE En 94 ai5 UNIVERSITY SALES E SERVICE 5211.1f TRUCE PARTS 194?Sfi VWR SCIENTIFIC 519P.7? LAB SUPPLIES '54]47 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. fS.iS b,.l . .. HARDWARE. _.____ 99430a VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE, INC. IIB.sil.dA - COGSYGUCEIOH P2-35-1 (l ".94309 THE VAN SHACF 1737.76 VEHICLE REPAIRS 554313 VAN GOREN RUBBER CO. SI,J58F67 ATTEND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 19.312 VA RC, TEAT 1F UTNCA7 Cr. 517..: COEIGHT! R - -- 594312 VA-EC CIS. OF ESERVIC f3J.11 FREIGHT! C54.1• _,,.__ WES VF�ICLE SPRING SERVICE tjf 3..l _ ,. . _ TRUER PARTS 1513 L1 - WES PRIMER COAST ANALYTICAL 113.752.11 LAB n94316 WEST COAST TIEIYTILSL S45"..:+ LAB SERVICES 354316 WEST RNCOAST TEA.NINAL3A INC.MAC _._. 1275ARY . ._ 3EeSTIC SO 35a 31T -� WESTERN STATE ' --- - ---u HEFICAL SUPPLY S42_25.55 LAB SERVICES X.0.5-U-8] :54.•ls FOT F. WE SIONA MAC. 32•.23. : LAB SERVICES 354315 WILE011•5 EOUIPMEHI SEN lAL3.IkC S .SC PLEET NENTGL t PARK 122.6C EMPLOYEE HILEAGE EVal WOODWIND CLYDE CONSULTANTS S1.553.71 CNSULTING ENGINEERS a krl FUP0 NO 41- - JT ]1ST YORYING CAPITAL FACCESSINC DATE 7/25/BP PA6E c y PEPCRT I:UYSER AP43 SCQIITY 4 PL&ITATIC.y.?lU-R-LL OF-98LPILE..C;JItSY YARPALT NO. i9sS22 YEP0 COPP. S4.;12.:7 COPIER LWW GEOPGE YAPULEY- ASSOCIATES .- _ __—T.223.c2 VALVE C 54324 JEFF YOILxEPS 627,06 8lRL0488 MILEAGE ----------------- T OTiL CL 41N5 �A L. 7,962,408,21 --- ---- ---�- ----)P/63/PB c> m -L' Rl OPER FUND C -.._.... P2RPIINp_ _.L 29.93 i2 D -810.58 n + 92 FIR FUND 1.537.825.76 _ 03 OPEN FUND 9,49].28 -1 —fJ7kO-FUND_ _._ .__._._.. 2I0.080.]S - 3 IS OPER FUND 2.005.35 05 AM FUND _ 6.1§i..02 _. —�6 DPE& FUND - Ep . 5,351.90 7 OPER FUND. 35,221.I3 "_._._.iF P/0. FUND _ _ - - 1.4T6.44._. . __—._-__ I 911 0PER FUND - 16.54 n Ill AM FUND 275J94.16 0566 OPER FUND _},qyl,]¢ r -_-.-.i566 .(CO FUND 45.BB4.20 0667 OPEN FUND 2,674.44 17 _ P7614 OPER FUND 3.632.46 N - JT OPER FUND 1,020,037.01 -- - CORP 4,6B2,233.12 JT YORNINO CAPITAL FUND 114,858.01 n _ B 7,966,548.49 I -- . QY 0. PyG .0 - IT '1ST sa-+1\0 C11IT14 PROCESSING DATE Eryt/P. P43e 1 I7T REOCRT 14UPOER AF41 I -- A.IMh-Yawi *R+0N.419i% "S-OF-GIN tse BUNTT - I= �+ CLAIMS -AID 98/L7/!S POSTING DATE 98/17/89 �1 � f ��' •P♦p.P pq5 STSlf VS. um 1135.:5 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES T *Ss -I TShOPHONS 1.I [Y S4R A-v10D $2r 326.7e GENERATOR O94347 LYC IYCOPPOPATCO 12.58 PREIGHT .___ .-.._ 4, dI a,y„!y�•v1t .___._.�.YS4rP�- PN PRBSS0R-PARTS 1I 1943.a LICCLN Cw1rT5 '. 1N1ii 1Co3 SSC2.^A FLOORING C9A.5: iCT[Oh 1':STh L'HPNTS. VC. 11ri19.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS ! � - mobs 9! REFUND USSR FEE RPAVHSN hq U94-52 AEPO TECY SURVEYS. INC. i5U.10 RENTAL EQUIPMENT I 194753 AIR COLO SUnPL• INC. 125.94 ELECTRIC PARTS n a hP•�1`ti kk �- 4R9-r?l AGPHAW L^JIYi :Y L`C 1•TC!/)LI STCTF 11.932.4 VEHICLE LEASES Z ,� 9HSE :LLif] CORF::PATIOe 116.498.2E CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-87 LH '.4dGi kk PURE VALVES 09♦!5Y ALL PUPE CHEMICAL 556,134.15 CHLORINE M.0.10-14-E7 'ul 09.35n ANAHEIM SEVCR CONSTRUCTION 32.211.n4 MANHOLE REPAIRS n 'u e i _ 'ARHWAR ar LVCP<ON A9FFALT FAVI"tl- cc. %Ill ,• PARKING LOT STRIPING •EE2 ASSICILTE! LAe'9PTfa15' 116'.." LAB SERVICES .9, F+LBIN 9!5.-65+k 6FPWl8 63,950,S _Ri9 RBM0%hRIm " - 39-86'�T 3! Ll4564 6.C.APACH. INC. $54.34 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 00 ;n' ^94365 FAKER CCUIFBERT REkTALS 4132.90 RENTAL EQUIPMENT >✓ BRV-8EEGP! 2S 6r3Sr PN i _ +nA•1,) etrTSu lCIi YT IiIC .10n0C 15 11.'65.5C LAB SUPPLIES n •y� PAS •)'•CIT :I_:'..HILL I :a' 'FCST F33.'93.17 ENGINEERING SERVICES AES 88-53 !n r ---502.PC eoNdIETB T- a let�7L POL}oONty ;•li -AT47CHANCE t180.)1 MANITERANCE CONTRACT LM L7 .aa; :'9`371 20N•a.o 4E1 1156.lT TRUCE PARTS Ls ..._.._...__..._- ter_.-- �v:nR-bIN6-MOV IHG .___.._...__. •u r.y �P--"---SRP1.9�0E`IPIL'LLH.I:IYL7141' W.. . N n ie.iE nd(\N ! CLL'YSLL fOPil'LlIv1' Hbr III_" LAB SERVICES .aP.i1 aU1LDING ':1.6<. IL'C. III_" PUBLICATION %a FLftY I•..E'F'!Cf- L£EAT20N- : � ]9A37E eUSN AND ARSOCIATIS. INC. f1.a7t.f4 SURVEYING SERVICES P1-20 ,.i 4P4-77 -GARY 0. STPIED F2.375:25 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT oa 4+am- ' w_..-..._-.__._....-_. ......-______iSt.t'-.-- ---- -PRE£BHP- -.._.-..._..-_. ,'I 4•ta C:L•SLiSe PIP IhC. 11.563.•. LAB REPAIRS La C:.i+GL 1'C. 1766., REGULATOR PARTS tiAe'. 1 WFi iSF1v! t bf! •8-----"--"150trs5.1-"- P:RS-PAGTEETION-MAFNTSNACE-- ]P.a62 CAvPt IOGC FILTi.R CCRP. $521.52 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES T94303 C.STLE ' 4223.•:1 SERVICE AGREEMENT ,w _ ^.ir9!.PY-PI k.S TAa'!S T11Ct'V+v. ..... 25.34'a FERRIC-CHLORIDE.-__-._... ._. . _ CEI^VEST 1'I VS IBICFE IYC. I±5.34E05 FERRIC CHLORIDE 9.0.11-18-87 Cn:\HIh+ VIDt.. dET [C. fU±.79 DPPICB MACHINE REPAIR C.L.C.S. CO. . INC. 4156.9E MAINTENANCEPARTS .1-u. COYSDl1341fL ELCCTiICAL C1:T. t2.334.49 ELECTRICAL PARTS d D� 0U+ FUNC Cf - JT ' EST 4.a41'IG CAFITAL FFOCFSSING DATE A/y/32 PAGE 2 I@' 4E20RT 'IUM3E1 SPAS N ' CLAIMS PAID CS/1T/PS POSTING DATE 1S /66 . R hI �•I q^ VFM OOP `OYNI PP6F'FPTI OM - ;ES•9, COV 9'iLIOATEL •.f- a°HIfS f1.A25.T2 BLUEPRINTING 19'k a) Jog!92 CONTROL DATA COP P. 3129.35 COMPUTER REPAIRS C91393 COSTA MESA AUTO SUFFLY 6264.55 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS W.T a1'a5 CHEST GFTING IVC. 1212.+1. LAB SUPPLIES I'� fy'9c C11 v Iff 1.11.21 RENTAL EQUIPMENT wl 999 yl 6T Ti-0 i;A i, pun,. 191!!8 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE S2.12A.62 TIRES D 11A?a9 DECKER INSTRUMENT SUFPLV CO. 1224.16 INSTRUMENT PARTSC71 lal ., a .. 4,r— -iFaST•+�--- :.AD-SHRVICE6 FYI a . .•°'1 DOPa00 ENTT.PP ISES. [P.C. 95•T35.•. EMERGENCY REPAIRS SEWER PIPE - = IN .,,Po2 OR!9GiR INDUSTHICEP INC. 1124.!3 MECHANICAL PARTS p 6 i"'9 FF--FliY6i 'F46 WAS P! PFIM JPP.:G ri n wl C944^A OUNN EOVARDS COAF. 91,745.65 PAINT SUPPLIES w .. �.: 094405 E.I.L.•iNS1RUMFNTS, INC. 193.29 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES �•• m FN N. .. -HEAT COFP. Nee.264.55 CONSTRUCTI0 5, • 29 j 'n•°^5 -,. A SENVIf.FS. IMI.C• i122.a: CONSULTING SERVICES INS Go '� 091o1J EC2 EL 21. OFFICE SUPPLIES IN 09FF11 AGFA P.. FALME99TFIN F.F. 13.2 GM 10 51 CONSTRUCTION SeRVICEB P1-20 FREIGHT F as eE LL Yti t121.2" PROPANE w Tw' '9••'+ a1..Le fltca ST.UCIU•AL I!.F-, S194. 1• ENGINEERING SERVICES :M , r a„ F i' PILAFF SwAPhV YO _ NeemweRii PARTS mi C9FF16 FISCHER C Py Tr- CC. S3,M?.e2 CHLORINATION PARTS 'lyq w In. OS4437 FLO-SYSTEMS S333.J4 MECHANICAL PARTS 1+1 FEb-•E. RUAG9-r- 14E.---.-_---..-- 55•4F.+fi-- FveiP-PARTS (q ' � •a.Is FILLIATII VALLEY C*04 S11.9F PHOTO PROCESSING FPA9CE CO"PiEaSDF Fa0',LCT A3.3Ji.3! COMPRESSOR PARTS 9-.21 Sit 2 TYkk-'FB $1 i.41 CARER-YSEAES-- ' n 'wi J94422 6FS CHEMICAL! 161.44 CAR SUPPLIES �w CAP n9 N 2! OFNAML LUMMFP ARE i1 r361.11 LUMBER/HARDWARE •^ .r N ,w ." P -FP 4FPIF--TEND, LAE Ef.-.-- .-_.__..-._._..___iti{2}.-Sa.._..._. ._- TzLEPHONE--.-._--__.___—.___._ . 'aa•2°. - nf•5 ':-D to LaH fc,+' FILM 'e°•P6 11?'L itn-Tli:of LL. Y.C. SIi.23?.a. MECHANICAL PART aF 'T 49'k' b6' F iM+l.fr-�aF•SOF---- —64.6E+./fi NSINHHR£N6-SERVICES-PS-20- 29412M GDNDOY•S. IVC. i2T1.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES J9F129 DGN GREEM S ASSOCIATES lB.N35.5, ENGINEERING SERVICES DIST 267 4-3V cvaY-P�I:i4FY-aiDMl' — .._._.. _F3T!SilY3- POTIP-PARTS- —-—- ."431 —�ti El'oFa C.V.1. CIL:F. • P.C. 13S,o1 MECHANICAL PARTS i.n 'a1+�2 a,f •q.FFf:', aP0/Lf ISCO 5131.EC INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ib TFP• """ '9T 1I Fa.Ago HAND "S eWST! — Iµ •9F 434 HOUSE OR FATTEFIES 52.365.9E HASTERffi8 i--N Igo- C91F35 HUFFY CDAPOf ATIGA 591.2E BICYCLE PARTS to N FPvL IC .I. I .. JT :1ST >Oe*IyP E•. IF.L a0'ISSIXS )AT! ./;i/5P P13E S - fCaORT t1UM3Ei fR it fiftlwf 4.a,FPAF 0514 eF9 OF RE--C9tlhTY W:y, CLaINE TITO .8/17/43 POSTING DATE :8/I7/88 I�i C°a Cf ^W,^<^ Co.. VC. HARDWARE F at RUM TM"---- 0.4.31 wUNTINSTOM SIIFFL- 193.9E HARDWARE , �.i 09.93. INCall SYSTEMS, INC./ f29.6e7.77 EMMISIONS CONTROLS — PITT NOS IVSUST.I.L is9TC $56.10 SUBSCRIPTION 1'rtdROATICMAL -U:IN:S< 'AC.IEE f591.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES !� 1"1 141 9 11l EBR tlSESG Te45i5♦ XAMAN NEAPINGS E SUFPLY E537.22 PITTING& �` : wElTF• 9 ASS"I•TES f7.123.1C ENGINEERING SERVICES D�� -cY==4 wiPP. —..--_____ 91 RRRY-9¢RVECEB :^.a.i •:Y'. tE:e IN4. iiC. 32.74e.29 MACHINE SUPPLIES 2 JULY LEE_ t15.F3 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE vEM"I"BE-11EETENG--a TRAVEL--- y, :91131 L1iECCx.SAFfYY SEAYICE SUPILY f171.a5 CYLINOBR REPAIR l.. „i ES4591 ,.F. LINDSTPOM. I.C. f9,/14.61 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES •' :....5 ••iL`CLP FIAHIF . 11C. t13,776.71 ENGINEERING SERVICES US 86-146 3�u :SU S1 a1C•.iC NABSELIV i0a,2E EMPLOYEE MEETING 6 TRAVEL 09.936 PITT - CNLOP. INC. E13i.7. CHLORINATION SUPPLIES ^9a a57 MCw IML[T V:UIPR NT CORP f215.69 TRUCK PARTS 'w 1 �^ sbwep -��94YsT C •T OP ASS FC IAIE:. I.C. 11.347. INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES 1325.6 • COMPUTER PARTS 56,12 tics r n� C9.45P °L:^.EU IUkTICF COhSTPUCTIOL CC 196.10i.eep CONSTRUCTION 3-29R-1 YOTCXCL 4 IM. f94.1. BATTERY. N m °a.65 -TICURL `A`.1 n:T Sl•a:LT 5155.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES a•aff '.E•L Sl;Ie L• It. 141T.d2 PITTINGS w A r - MKAtPART3- � kCUTRON 13.611.:. ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-12-57 iw w 99..Ea XENAP4 ELLCTPC'IIC: f25LC9 CINATSTERRUMOESNETA GSLUPPLIES IV n-- s 8-v 9t: A..TI tC^T` _< ;T:AL ' RIS.'- INSTRUMENT PARTS :F F ICE =A V IL I C%'a SIC• Y! <, Ia5.127.E OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-5 ' E9t9i-6be a;l Ie-suR ha--.---_—.-E1Hv-7} 99..11 SPIKE COUNTY PUTS FIAT! CO. f764.I6 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS :91.13 O9INSE VALVF % FITTIY6 CO. f191.39 PITTING$ t w ••• "'.a5�— .—i'IW)Y-T•F-'w+,S�- -._.. ._--.__. .. _.—may rtt r3I--- ---SpRVESYDrBPOSAs_.__. _ - •?' 9a•T7 C01-'.Tl SAA[T.TTCH L!STPICT SS.717.22 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE ••Or CACIFit :..<^ 15A.•9 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT -491-Fu-! MECHANICAL PARTS ^ 954e2 F.CIFIC ^L(ETY E4UIFP947 L.I. t3Z8.1` SAFETY SUPPLIES F.°..71 PACIFIC ]CLL Us.?- TELEPHONE CV FUG. l0 .-i dT i'T :. c+1D� C_rIIAI =POCESSIMG CATE a/i A/95 PAGE AEPORT NUMIE+ AF13 I CLAIMS PAID IP/17/86 POSTING DATE C'9/17/38 'al Y•R^ IT VL -'y-' YNT BESE'ti• I9N p� PAC IEI CELLLLI+ 151.1+ CELULAA PHONE SBRVICE ' -3 E"I ki59.iC--BAN c' 17+I 95A914 oAOI cSPA OCF s656.75 PEER REVIEN COIRITEE EXPENSES jRl Q ..85 EAT. MARWICK, MAIL: V CO. R11.923.:: PROPESIONAL SERVICES aI '• 4A... `Y" 'T UERS.--.RE. --- iN3iROMEN. FARES ,. 1 aiaN c-Ila ? SM',v C. 142.21 COMPUTER SOFTWARE "•' I'+I ^•AFa iIrlllc+ <t P I?}S.SF JANITORIAL SUPPLIES r "' ' ' ""' "F d 32i 1" SDOECE R1 .113] M.O.S Ti CE— ,^•`.�� C9-.9V PITUEY -DUE- 115E 35 POSTAGE METER RENTAL C94-91 POLY ENTEFPRISES. INC. $553.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES n�al 9••^2 kE P.w RF IE_ —_— ____ _+es - —__ - m `+•eoa PrP•SS1ONIL TF113.IUL =SSDf 135.: 1 SUBSRIPTION " •^r �I uF=TTC%AL ]9F[ f}.5::." .. Z - TREE REMOVAL " tza5 , .- . ��� C9+59E PULSAFE A CONSTRUCTION SERVIC138 P ir22.BC PUMP PACTS 5•497 PE. MAP. s6.535.48 +'I �m0 a A_� .a. fTl ;. v TE Mc Sa;a.3^ TEMPORARY SERVICES +� 31 I•: N`F�JFL. . $1• L1 : `. PIPE/FITTINGS Ian`5•E.1 0 >1•J53.• _ ._ .. .R awi 3t 39.552 RICOH CORPO+ATION f92.10 I� al +aI Co•PY} PJY tE INS 1?UMFNT R2.181.3t COPIER LEASES OVERSPMY REPAIR .A`.•: aT%VIA • _ ELECTRIC MOTOR n'M °•'1' ' If ..pT:a. t.FS l.SI TerSaP —�[1Tv IF tC AL•i EA LM .-- s]3.]2 WATER USEAGPP ES �•+ m+29 SE..... a0E""CM A. CC• S335.]C O:a AFETER —r•�r-I� 5f.il.F.41'1P. cL.R is-i9c F. —il3A2.L,1.— ._ [ I[i taP r•lr. 1'd 'S SAFETY SIGNS 1+.+2. va-. COIL At:: R!TI`G ":'14TC=S .•13 SUPPLIES PLUMBING SUPPL •'• F ']-�'-.'dam— ••••.•_-..a-F=4i1+-«bte:.N-LOB-. ._.__ " SOIL TESTING lzi ae 5. Cro'wi a9eElA -0. CAL. GAS CO. 34'.0.]E NATURAL GAS >9.5!5 RUL'•T-EFN CG'JNTIES CIL CO. i•.55].+• •4 -I'... DISEL FUEL ry 5OOLE .•1.:1] - TC dL cUrrlr C:;, 3+P..°? TOOLS ' o••L So-IA. I"t. 315.415.33 VIDEO SERVIC83 ACTION PLAN •" 99•+2.1 sur LP C9EM COPC .1657.21 ••• -ot<21 T.r CHEMICALS � S'JP=LIE=S 53.593.19 '• ••. •+•.��__ .-TLRpD"Lw._ TOOLS/tlARDWAR6 •^ 19oe2^ •'-i ±LI`.[ [: [3J.e. - FITTINGS—__- ____ • OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR c.w +a•13'+•• CONTRACT GROUDSKBEPIND A`Z. A-As b»-LY:.�--- _.._-.___:;.Si.+S-- C3UtT RTS--__..____.-.___ '915?6 TRL CELAVAL INC. il.N9HF '94R27 PC DELAVAL IdC. 15.951. -9 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES MECHANICAL PARTS Irs eM 1 PU 9C "G _ -'ISI V^4•I�;�. �C=11SL "OCPSSING DATE ?/7^/SA FIG. _ G'Y 9EP ORi I:UP6E4 5443 I --to.N.{Y-5fx}Fii}Oi-t-I-SFI(C;ir9f o%q 6 �{ CLAIPS EA10 '6/17/03 POSTING DATE 48/I7/88 l T� :YEL rc IV0. 54l%.4 TRAVEL SERVICES T S. I1+49!rlr :..eo ARVS L9.E3: TVININE LAP0RATPAIC3 $1,789.SL LAB SERVICES J9.531 UNOCAL 1145.41 GASOLINE _ _ - IrSERVEC'ES - 1 ` .-7. ,YR SCIE3TTAIC 13.A31.46 LAB SUPPLIES �� •9..3a VALLEY :[TITS 'U:aLY C�. 12,121.oj HARDWARE a� ON _ 6R0&fEHT :+I ;�4 $94536 VOP T21 IN UUETRIE3 s2.E14.15 BUILDING REPAIRS 194537 40-4 R. VA-LES Si54.42 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT �• !-YYA-. . — NSBHP£NG-SBRVICES— � � s4539 ELT COAST 9:ALYTKLL CPV. i1.15C. `C CAN SERVICES m 2 .Y4 TERN STATE :.EAICAL SLFLLY 12.07';.EE CAUSTIC SODA M.0.5-13-87 n it 094?.2 NILSOM.S F.BUIFYENT CIATaLS.IMr $S9L21 HARDWARE RENALE ]945.3 be EtsE --EH Ac cGCItTES $96.41 HARDWARE F =E EBIr. -:I:MI .Y;P9"^. 2559.i� FREIGHT '� 3 � TBFKZL�-ffir Prr'YDo -�'YNYt£—�i�rli'��' ,M L +ry UMMARF —_- - AMOUNT . n;.a r am: 92 'OPEN FUND s 90.75 r 'z�1 1 OPEN FUND 2,240.50 0 12 OF/FtPEN FUND 2,240.SD u 13 OPER FUND 96,117.56 6117 5 �u fA +' 15 ACO FUND 96,200.66 w-j 15 OPEN FUND 039.66 A7 eN /S ACO FUND 12,037.19-_ 16 OPEN FUND 0.08 17 OPEN POND 14,860.08 n /11 OPBR PUND_ . q,264.20-_ sz 15& OPER FUND 6. /566 ACO FUND 548,166 .20 17a 14 OPEN FUND 3670.00 ST OPEN FUND ---- --J79.I61.70 - MAP 411,144.80 _ _SELF PUNDED.WORRERS COMP INSURANCE FONDa- ___._ - ,059. 2 __ ... OT OPBR FUND � 309.059.72 $1.y,�lj617.335.07 to A Fb RE RC 'I?^ - Jr 'IST 4JMMICG CLFITPL PROCESSING DATE 1/2410F CAGE J REFORT UUP.BER AF.3 CRATV Sf! IT=TICK 01STRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY F� WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION � - .I 9eS49 AA ::UIF✓ERIT s25.-E TRUCK PARTS +^] A.F. 1P:uU!T°IAL EGGItlEEPING 32.05-w MECHANICAL PARTS 094599 ACACIA/VWR ELECTRONICS $331.56 INSTRUNENT PART P94601 ACCESSORIE AIR COMPRESSOR SYS. 51.991.37 AIR DRYER ;e46N2 AOVANCO CUI.STRUCTCRS. INC. S1.F95.435.41 CONSTRUCTION J-15 19.F03 RIP PRODUCTS 4 CHEMICAL INC. t40.4d CHEMICALS J94605 ALLIED CORPORATION sI1.88B.54 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O. 3-11-87 P94646 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. S12.71 FREIGHT n IiT e.f3R AVryICAV CAST IRON mlFE CO./ 59.454.R2 MECHANICAL PARTS 'n .940:9 AMFa1TECF COPIER SUPPLIES m l7 ••I 694611 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 3S.:13.83 RACAVATION/SEWER REPAIR 294612 THE ANCHOR FACKIMG CO. s2.591.09 P@@ PANTS i C t OE 09. 9 0 TM%99b 6 MOISTENS EXPENSE :A9E31 A-a LUS SYSTEMS 14.693.a1 NOTICES 6 AGE rn lSAfI5 APPLIEC FILT°ATIOO 32. 43.62 PIPE STOPPER 3 I y M C9461] ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES s32C.JO LAB SUPPLIES 394616 ASSOCIATE' SOILS ENGINEERING 111.554.50 SOIL TESTING 1^ 910 G I I 0 C[ C C I 959 !R RBEEEFEE SUPPLIES I •62i RMSA - CONF?RENCC OF COASTAL 14. •51... MEMBERSHIP DUES •AG21 ✓SR SSiS.:' CONPERENCE FEES n pp R r 6.� N9R623 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY. INC. $296.64 SLINGS j.� ✓99 E24 14Lt OS DISPOSAL SERVICE 335.719.47 GRIT REMOVAL N.O.10-29-86 m °e 42f 2.I. 6RAOTTI ANS ASSOC. S4.732.U9 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-25.26.P1-32R33 4R627 2. r'TE✓lil 5565.:: DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION I ]OURS supphiss ti ,WR+J !94629 BECMPAN 140USTRIAL CO. 351.O0 REPAIRS Cl It.'i 09A630 ROBERT BEIN.JILLIAM FROST t AS s1.313:;0 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 88-52 -LACK S - IC .3 PNOPESSEBIIAbSERVE2E9 " 7 N • �..I :94E3e PLUS DIAMOND MATER19L6 t535.2F CONCRETE L.. 114R33 EULSA 4ROIATOP SERViCC 5.5.•C RADIATOR REPAIR !ON POCS ! S C TRUER PARTS Iw .39.635 BROUN A CALCVELL SS.251.:G LAB SERVICES nl G94636 5404N 6 CALDWELL CONSULTING 52..345.55 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 08-40 °IT le .LOOM B✓OFFE BENIs:Rvl'PEONz2 26-1 INC. • •.531:. CLOCK REPAIRS 94f 3° GRIT a sr-r-o 55^1.77 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT °R94E41 C.S.R. SERVICE CO. s19i.3. VAL VE 'W fl f:•-u� JT -ISl :ORAIRC CFFITAL =bOCE3SING DATE P/24/85 FACE P EFT UUN3ER AFi3 C,-UUTT S-%174L ICR DISTRICTS OF Di ANCE CCUL TY (l q, -i"A I W4PPANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESC4IAT70N =.6.2 C. e, ], [)T.]S INSTRUMENT REPAIR s4641 CAL ChrV C FF. 32.E2s,IL CHEMICALS A..1. INSTRUMENT NINEPINS '94645 CAFOLLO-BOYLE.s JOINT Vf RTUFF 3125.412.3S ENGINEERING SERVICES US 87-131 C'94k4E JONN CAROLED ENGINE IRS $109.556.13 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-21,J-6-2,P1-22 _ DI TION9- =4k4E CEITURT SAFETT INST, 3 SCFi. AR,12.r♦ SAFETY SUPPLIES Alf4= FIFCPGRATF 379.13 CLIPS '•' 1102 054691 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. 14.765.19 UNLEADED GAEOLINE 394652 CHR15TEVE CORP. $237•J52.3G CONSTRUCTION 11-16 a ._ ,. , _ sDtTlt]e-seRVTces n 94E54 CJLSTU 9E CCHSTAUCIISM 329.465. ] CONSTRUCTION 5-27 'Z is kES LOFARESSCP CLNFONILTS EF CFLis i+'•iAS.-4 ENGINE PARTS C7 n ESTE .94657 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. S4.562.24 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES �x :9465F CONSOLIDATED RCPP06R ACMICS 35.351.4♦ BLUEPRINTING ==ke.. CDATPOL DATA COAFSR:UOI' 1I.5i9.b] COMPUTER REPAIR T :945R1 R. Z. COULTER CRANE RENTAL 1519.7F CRANE RENTAL 3l l! G94661 CAL V6TER 384.56 RENTAL EQUIPMENT �� u5=E64 4A00T CURTI TRUCK A EOUIFPiNT 326.830.c0 SLUDGE REMOVAL 4-13-88 A94rbe STLr.- OF C-IIF.RN1- Lltl,..I: REORGANIZATION 111 PROCESSING PEE :-4E6] TRUCK PARTS D t- ..0 Etr-a--MEETING-EXPENSES - r ..aa,vI :R4665 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS S173.67 LAB SUPPLIES 6EN•FAR SALES R SERVICE S3.225.29 MECHANICAL PARTS "S;n"eLZ 4AS11. SY5 N bl "94EY N SF05teLE eA ST GY3 ME. I:C. 15.5b5•F7 MECHANICAL PARTS -I �J =•FT} OOf FCG �hTiRPPISEf.. IVC. 112.67i• '. INSTRUMENT REPAIRS/PLANT MAINTENACE ' A • • • IFA1�hRTS-. -.____ 194675 DOVHEYRS 601LES S VFLDIN6 FCF• 61.921.60 WELDING SERVICES 65462E DUNN COWARDS CORP. 32.353.84 PAINT SUPPLIES CA, - . .. . .: —�LN3TRUMEFM�PART9- 'SAF]r E1FC0 77C:3 FLVI=. CA. •?>S.fi; MECHANICAL PARTS 'R RIC" CiITVAN. I=.C. 3S1_I.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES V. M• I. -. '- R NSTRUCTION-S-29------'-- ^F4.21 ENFPSON INPUSTAIAL CONTROL$ 32.2 a.i4 MAINTENACE AGREEMENT L94BR2 E9VINONNERTLL AESOUPCE ASSCC. 3269•WR LAB SAMPLING *r- JcfF�$P FDorae-Mrl�Ace .5ckd+ FIT SAND •:C ..VtL. INC. $269.6: GRAVEL '4 yt3 %A.G..:LL F:IFF.=.P S33i. -D DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION „I 5 b f t N TEI F t f3i S CBNSTRUcTI sERVIEEB-P1-20-— L94RFT FAIR SALES 5 SERVICE 325J.R2 ELECTRIC PARTS Cl CUNL NO .199 - JT !19T 60FAIM6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 61241PS PAGE , J REi CRT %UHIEA AP41 COUNTY SANITATION VJST-IC73 OF ORA6FE COUNTY V! WARRANT N0. VENDOR 1NOUNT DESCRIPTION q A9LL FELLPAL Ev"ESS CO9=, 5271.25 AIR FREIGHT 9e40 FERFELLGAS 575.92 PROPANE 94691 FIS.EA SCIENTIFIC CO. $31.27 LAB SUPPLIES Ise 694692 FLAT L VERTICAL CONCRETE 2133.30 ASPHALT CUTTING 1' :94094 GCL^CR AUNTS, INC. 1279.JJ PUMP PARTS ]9.695 FOUVTAIN VALLEY CA-EPA $41.79 FILM 1^' 094497 DONALD L. FDA L ASSOCIATES 55.475.00 SAFETY CONSULTING C94696 FREDSON $93.67 TRUCE PARTS Iv a .iAP iA TT-CALLAHAI CONpa6Y 37I7.4C CHEMICALS En ill •!447P1 GENERAL TCLIFNONE CO. 15.619.16 TELEPHONE Z 9GrVESE 694795 GIERLICN-MITCMELL, INC. 516.982.62 MECHANICAL PARTS 094764 GORDON•$. INC. %311.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES •.947.16 FRANK -. GCINNF 733.571.iC USED VEHICLE 3 ,.9.7.7 GRI'MELL CO"GRATI01. S1d61..4 VALVES it 094109 FRED A. HARPER $1,512.94 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION :. 0947tS HARRINGTONINDUSTRIAL LAB SUPPLI8590 v 1 !94T12 9. f, NEALY CO. 1. iP s1.945.51 CONSTRUCTION P1-23R DO- 9e1U "EiPlGi4 C.V,!, CALIF. , 1'•'C, •224.sn MECHANICAL PARTS r r 1`d •194715 HOOTER CAMERA STORES 1163.46 FILM t7 ,,.1 C94716 ROD HOUSER 53.66 REFUND OVERPAYMENT .. PC. es- — N !„ "Ti2 CI7Y OF .•UhTINSTOH PERCH 546.56 WATER USEAGE On 9171^ ,U'tTTNGT0\ ECP CONV, PDSPITAL a1.9a7.RE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT BBR--STAMPB — A•9V21 I INCUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,233.99 FITTINGS INTF.RNATIORAL TE CMN OLOGY 675.:J TECHNICAL COMPUTER SUPPORT N L_ .11. II IC. N'11C Ra[ .. —�PFSCE�tlPPIrEE9 „rl 9172 IRVIUE CA.C•A t15S.Ee FILM Lil 9`19: li3. =acLF 4itiP OISTNICT fli. !,. ;;...'•. DIS CAR 11 DEPOSIT REFUND el MG----- ..� 34.727 CMAPLES 4. JACKS At :L EMPLOYBE TRAVEL 6 MEETING EXPENSE .9972R RIVIERA FINANCE i8l9.IT JANITORIAL SUPPLIES '�T9YTS!- O'.m E IY!'TOKIS LSSOC.,IUC. PROFESSIONAL SE I •- I,N� T!l JO7EE f ORDAN e9SOt..IOC. t3 d79.12 PROFLSEE TM SERVICES LNG STUDY Y.TS1 AJPEPT JO ROAM 491. .5 EMPLOYEE TRAVEL c MEETING EXPENSE N9 C1Y132 FA V;qp CJVA i.NY4 A S LpFC1 22.244 HARDWARREEAirPART6 — -- .tl 11 W FUNF`-_ '1:9 - JI LIST Wn4KI%G CLIITLL F%OCESSING DATE 1/21/RF FACE r • - .._I --raQT 'LUPSEP AF13 C^ULTY 3LNIT:TIOf. DISTPICTO DF ORANGE CCUN TY 1 .Q =� NARNANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION AE.NEDY MYGFAULICS tA95.6! P PARTS a.735 r11.IT PACIFI UMP C P. [I H1.•Ai:.2e CONSTRUCTION P1-20,P1-31 '114•! 09e00 737 DONALD E. NINNEY • • 1815.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 65V T36 MIDST PUMP S MACHINE WORMS S319.36 MECHANICAL PARTS INSTECITCH FEES 941.1 LL6 SAFETY SU'.FLY CO. • 3295.d3 SEMINAR • 9e74: LE' 1 RO CONSULTIMG ENG0. 145.932.a3 ENGINEERING SERVICES C94 W3 LIMITORGUE CORP. 5911.3E MECHANICAL REPAIRS JS41e. M.P. LINCSTRGM. INC. S2.13V.1J TECHNICAL SUPPORT m `e Tr6 MIS t13..63 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES Iq .q 54747 P.IR FFAME !ERVICES SI•722.:C INSTRUMENT REPAIR Z d ENGINEERING ERVH'ES--RH,S-8T---+4- D O5.Te9 MARTIN SUPPLY CO. S160.58 HARDWARE I•• u9e)55 MAOVAC ELECTRONICS $253.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLY "AMCJdb "To IT ,9e 152 RAPT - [nI LP. INC. 1325.r• CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 3 'Sr T!3 L. A. PAITNEWS L ASFOCILTFS S1•292.01 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 4k 994 T55 MCKENNn ENGR. L EQUIP. $5•625.13 MECHANICAL PARTS CO C91156 METAL FINISHING S29.g0 SUBSCRIPTION I" 'II YE MIMRS PRI3TE%Y 51.5.5..6 PRINTING SA T59 1,MC S:FET. AFFLILSCYE CO. fl•.a2.ad SAFETY SUPPLIES ENGINEERING SERVICES 1- L_� 09V161 •OF FeTF FICMOL ENGINEERS EIe.193 A! ENGINEERING SERVICES - C7 w� 09e)E2 MICHAEL D. "GORE S62.12 ENP YEE TRAVEL 6 MEETING EXPENSE 5.764 vOTOPL•L:• T%C. •4:35.12 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS >6' i C:P3TCPOL CiLLULFR SEWVI - 3FL a. CELLULAR SERVICES n •19r T6) N4TIONLL LUMf.E9 5251.99 HAR E R � ]91 i68 NA IIONSL PLANT SE RV lCE3♦ 11lC. 562S.T INSPECTIONS TV INSPECTIONCTION S `S.Ti' U:lf TEC+'.OITIP.GrLY t29%N: RENTAL UNITS TRASH BINS --- -8-14-BT- �,,; 39q73 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SEFVICf3 $339.94 SAFETY GLASSES E•9.714 DRANGc COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $255.56 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES TT- OCRECHRIC-ACID "94776 CALVLE •IALVt L fITTV:C CC. 55.9J FITTINGS .Ar»1 5CTr•S L XC t SAFL 1519.. 5 SECURITY/KEYS . ----- . _ NG-REPRIRS.-- �Ae.T. O.YGEM SCJVICE S662AF SPECIALTY GASSES n•I z ri FU16 ':D -I-- JT DIST VORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9129/PS PAGE l REPORT 6URu ER 6P43 J CCIIM TY S:FiTa 10V :I STR ICiS OF OR 44GE [CUNiY Cl I U: WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION R� .I 9A7Ev CJCNTY ^F JPANGE $4,612.93 SERVICE AGREEMENT 9e 761 COUNTY OF 'PANEL SI .7043 .; DISPOSAL FEES .394783 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS S50.000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 094794 COUNTY SANITATION OISTR ICT $4.253.66 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE -:99786 FS3 SFNER SERVICE!. INC'. f1.>Y].1i TV INSPECTION :9V7R7 PACIFIC ELECTAIC. INC. f132.12a.:: CONSTRUCTION G-16 099789 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. s162.43 SAFETY SUPPLIES �p 094790 PACIFIC BELL 5545.45 TELEPHONE n 79 PRLLEiSR ACC ESSCPIES G0. tL 919.R: PALET LS CFI ;S."! .PARTS UNLINITEC NR9.5P AUTOMOTIVE PARTS L C7 � 099 T95 ory OTO 6 SOUND CO. t5.287.18 COMPUTER PARTS I>' .99796 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS. INC. $39,620.45 SLUDGE REMOVAL N.O. 5-11-68 PL%SI IC"1NT103TTT .. sgl..l ASTIC—EOTTLBB •T1 '•9179B •AROLD PRIMPGSE ICE 1231...0 ICE 3 L547-9 TryE PROJECTS SOLUTIOM CO. LR.279.91 INSTRUMENT INSPECTION # 99 R01 PTR ANIC FENCE COMPANY 162 T.OJ FENCING {� W 094EC2 QUEST INTL. MONITCR SERVICE. 11.166.50 INSTRUMENT REPAIR I a. e.. . .... . . — — •.SVR:9 RE0 VIAG 9a0ES �01.37 SAFETY $NDE$- A S557.62 INDEXES ' r r ly ;SOFPT TnE•REFUBLIC SUFPLY CO. t1.3S5.91 FITTINGS I'> p I3i i99EG2 RICGM CORPORATION $144.78 COPIER LEASES . FeP s 1. R. P]9 Ea;> .ARP. (/) WI 1'1• PO CC•F TRUCK ;:RECKI!.0 5132.5; TRUCK PARTS — — A.1Y AUCiUSTERS . IRE. L4ie.9: BUILDING REPAIRS IRE—� G 99 P13 BECKMAN INDUSTRIAL/ $1.698.29 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 69♦EI4 JOSEPH T. RTEPSON 6 SON, If1C. 29.900.86 METAL PUDIPNEI91'—RETITAL Ag -.— 51'1s SCIENCE 4FFLICLTICkS INTIL S.^S2r>11.21 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 6-10-87 . 94417 SEA CC:ST DESIGNS f133.6! OFFICE FURNITURE _—_ . FAINT A. SUPPLIES-.._--.__ IT '9VF19 SNRF•CN TOOLS CORP. t24.16 TOOLS '54820 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS s210.G1 SOIL TESTING —...—•'+'Ft] �JeYJ:O'?RCTJCI'3—R• —.—__— �.'E£—OVERPAYMEIfl'-"—. i4 VV•+ SOUTR COAST COCGF •f22.99 TRUCK PARTS j..� . ^412] SOVIFCFV CALIF. LCISON CO. 513e.:97.L3 POWER _ Prn.N..ccDRrtLs�Tr-cr.--- . . '9Vb25 SPARML TTS DRINKING NATEF 11.493.46 WATER/COOLER RENTALS L_ fl � F rJ 51a' JT ]IST VOFMING CAFITAL FPCCESSING DATE 8/21/8R PAGE f ■ ' J REPORT HOMIER AF41 C3L'NlY SfP.ITATION CISTRICTS OF OPANCE COON TV Cl i al Ell IAf WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCRI-TION �� L� 'a2i SPIRAL 51301NG CO.. INC. 2I'96.5F OFFICE SUPPLIES .� .S.;2? SPIRES ACSTRUFANTE. IPC. sGR.3R REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT CM h99EE9 SUBIe. IMC. Co. 21.TB9.95 VIDEO TAPE PRODUCTION ACTION PLAN ml C94635 SUPELCO. IHC. fp0.i2 LAG SUPPLIES •:9R k 32 TAVLOR-YUNM T235.27 TRUCE PARTS •.94p!S rEARAR COMFRNY to,LR3.7U L118 EQUIPMENT rrI1ah tY pN I IOIIFSON MCC I IC C CONF R 830 00 I�CR]EIIC1� SEOI CES R I, 49.P35 TINAER L RASOR S46B.63 DETECTOR 1 H9636 IMO DELAVRL INC. i1.T86.IG MECHANICAL PARTS a :l :5.Fie R.O. TRERICE CO. 1196.33 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 01 •9.%39 TROPCETTA CORPORATION fil• dO.2k VALVE PARTS 091pA1 J.6. TU CHEN L SON. INC. 6392.20 FANRP 7A• ?9.R42 TWINING LAP...T OR IES 1280.16 CONCRETE TESTING •:5."% THE UNISOCRIC COFF. ' 1941.R6 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3 '94F.5 UYITCD PADCTL SERVICE 1221.1A PARCEL SERVICES up eve a 10R-PDIIRTERA v A 694447 URBAN ALTERNATIVES 911.54S.VV ACTION PLAN COMMUNITY OUREACH I'J 00 39.h1tl VYP SCIENTIFIC i3.543.3C r.e SUPPLIES VALLEY CREST LaNOSCAPR, INC. S132.612. E CONSTRUCTION P2-35-1 R941.1 VALLEY CETPVT DIESEL RS•3T3.-. GENERATOR rINSMUMENT PA r— v 091h53 VAAIAN INSTRUMENT GROUF $135.16 CABLE Zvi 5549!4 YINING IMOUSTRIAL SUPPLY S614.3P SOFTWARE O 5 OA LLRCF R I [P R ' (n .5A eye ALTEPS MOEIL'_ POPE FFFYGCC 2.77.F ' BUILDING MATERIALS ...I 'S1.57 CARL UAkOEX I CC. 1277.': INSURANCE SERVICES RT T L94E59 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPFLV 823..87.11 CAUSTIC SODA N.O. 5-13-87 :91R6F WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. S319.44 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ''aRh2 ROURKE UQXRUFF s21.a3L MR LEGAL SERVICES M.O. 10-14-07 A -...5! VOl CUAAO CLEF COLSI!LTFNTS 12. .26.22 CONSTRUCTION FEIM SERVICES FtRYUrK't_ _ CES-- 691P65 XEROX CORP. f3.i6B.66 COPIER LEASES :94666 GE2PGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATFS $63.55 SATURNINE • • .---------------- MC CCOlto.m op �•al fY El :Il FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/24/88 PAGE ] REPORT NUMBER AP43 „j COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ri CLAIMS PAID 08 31 80 POSTING DATE 0 31 SS I V SUMMARY AMOUNT tl 3 547.00 S. J82 06 12 163, fi l,961.68 y+ddll 93 . 13 120.]90.80 15 9,565.07 IS 29r5fi4.56 IS 9.45 6,a11 l al 16 339.45 2 Il 10r 610.00 ''� Il 673.00 t7 1r873.00 h 113 2,779.51 P'I I11 23J.081.06 14 12,000,114.00 I IW1� 1566 9,794.52 r t 66] 1,386.68 �y 17 614 3.181.11 .TT nPER Flnm 1.171.911 19 CORF 5,060,952.39 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FOND 60,736.31 r JT WORKING CAPITAL FOND 602.992.62 r +" C7 'HI i 20,323,364.24 -Hy-I • >al C1 'aJ _— ------------f a1 �n I V �..r/ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. One CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 17, 1988 JOB: Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4 Amount of this Change Order (Add) Wedust) $ 16,444.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 MODIFICATION OF FIRE PROTECTION WATER LINE The Contractor was directed to change the size of the new Administration Building fire protection water line and valves from 8" to 10" and install the water line under the new Phase "A" parking area. These changes included the cost of premium time to perform the work across the existing laboratory rear parking lot after work hours and steel plate rental to maintain access. Also, additional effort in labor and materials required by working around and under undisclosed conduit encased electrical duct banks. The above items were not shown on the contract plans or in the specifications as scheduled by the Contractor to be included in the Phase 3 demolition and renovation. This item of work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #1). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $17,846.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 STAIRWAY CHANGE IN MATERIALS The Contractor was directed to install four additional 4" schedule 80 conduit Incased sleeves under the Phase A and Phase B parking lots to provide for irrigation lines for future new north road landscaping without disrupting the J-7-4 parking area improvements now being installed under this contract. The conduits were not shown on the contract plans or included in the contract specifications. This item of work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A. of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #i). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 3,898.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days D-1"' AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. One ) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 988 JOB: Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4 Item 3 PLANT 1 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS The Contractor was directed to fabricate and install an additional sixteen signs in Plant No. 1 facilities. The additional signs were not included in the contract plans and specifications and were necessary due to vehicular access disruptions caused by construction of the Administration Building addition. (Reference: FCO $1). This item was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHARGE ORDER ITEM: $2,200.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar-Days Item 4 WEST EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT SCHEDULE CHANGE The Contractor was directed to complete construction of the west employee parking lot prior to beginning the Phase A parking area construction adjacent to the existing Administration Building. This item included the cost of an additional move-in for a paving crew, grading equipment and striping contractor to complete the west employee parking lot prior to the beginning Phase A construction. The contract specifications required the Contractor to complete the west employee parking- lot concurrently with the Phase A parking area. (Reference: FCO #I). This item was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 15 Calendar Days Item 5 STAIRWAY MATERIALS CHANGE The Contractor was directed to change the material specified for the Administration Building exterior stairway No. 3, located on the west side of the building, from stainless steel to painted carbon steel resulting in a cost savings. The material was changed to reflect that used in the past on the existing Administration Building where corrosion is not a-problem. (Reference: FCO t2). This item was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($10,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $16,444.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 15 Calendar Days "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92798 CHANGE ORDER - GRANT NO. N/A C.O. NO. One CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE ugust 8 JOB: Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4 The. additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any revisions to the Contract Time made by this and previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 15 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been and will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressely granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Ur-iginal Contractate July 11, 1988 Original Contract Time 602 Calendar Days Original Completion Date March 4, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 15 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 15 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 617 Calendar Days - Revised Completion Date March 19, 1990 Original Contract Price $ 3,549,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $�— This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 6�- Amended Contract Price $ 3,56 Board u orizat on Date: September 14, 1988 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMM DED BY: 08/23/88 o ruct on Manager J.R. ROBERTS .CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: APP BY: 08/23/88 08/23/88 ontrac or r c or o ngineering "D-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Nine 9 CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE August 11, 1988 JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20 AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS OS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMENT B ILER• P N LEANOUTS; AND URADINU AND PAVING Al PLANT NU. 1, J B NU. P1-31 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Bedaet:) $ 204,594.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. P1-20 Item 1 HOT WATER CONVERTER TUBE MATERIAL CHANGE The Contractor was directed to change the boiler hat water tube bundle material from copper to admiralty brass. The tube material was changed to give added corrosion protection over the life of the unit. Admiralty brass tube material was not included in the contract specifications, resulting in a higher additional material cost for the boiler package. (Reference: Submittal 0120-088.) This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)Q of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,541.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 BOILER AREA MODIFICATIONS In the area designated for the new boiler, the Contractor was directed to excavate carefully around undisclosed utilities, add an additional 12 inches of aggregate base material under the concrete boiler base pad and delete approximately 70. LF of drain pipe. It was necessary to raise the new concrete boiler pad an additional 12 inches to avoid surface water runoff conflicts with the elevations of adjacent existing paving. The deletion of drain piping reflects a credit for installation only which is incorporated in the net additional costs of this item. The drain piping material was delivered to Districts' Maintenance Department for its use. (Reference: PCH #44.) This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,746.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Nine CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE August 11, 1988 JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT N0. 1 JOB NO. PI-20 AND DEMOLITION OF - DIGESTERS NOS. 1 2 AND PLA EM N OF ER• PIPING C EAN UT ND RADING AND FAVINU Al FLANI NU. 1, JOB NU. Item 3 PROJECT DELAY COSTS The Contractor was directed to evacuate the project site and Contractor's administration areas of all personnel due to an emergency condition at the Bulk Chlorine Station on July 6, 1988. The chlorine alarm was set off while maintenance work was being performed on the bulk chlorine tank. The extra costs associated with this item include the expenses of a total work stoppage along with the disruption of the entire project for approximately one (1) hour. This item is based on a direct cost plus percentage basis, pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)8 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,545.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 FLOW RATIO CONTROLLER MODIFICATION The Contractor was directed to modify the specified Flaw Ratio Controller to accommodate the flow input signals from future Flow Meters Nos. 1 and 2 on the recently installed 90" process influent (PI) lines. This modification was required to accommodate the future primary clarifier project (P1-33) (located at the outlet of the P1 lines) which will be installed at an earlier date than previously anticipated. (Reference: PCH #28.) This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,921.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES AT 90" PI LINES During the excavation for the 90" PI lines, the Contractor encountered several undisclosed utilities which conflicted with the installation of the specified piping. The Contractor was directed to remove and modify the conflicting utilities. The costs of this item also include project downtime while the utilities were investigated by the Districts staff. (Reference: FCO #75.) This item was accomplished on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,597.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Nine 9 CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE August 11, 1988 JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20, AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMENT OF B ILER• IPING CLEANOUTS; AND GRADIN AND AVIN AT PLA N0. , JOB NO. P1- 1 Item 6 CONCRETE BOX CONDUIT REMOVAL The Contractor was directed to remove a concrete box conduit that conflicted with the installation of the 78" Fairview/Gisler trunk line. The box conduit was abandoned and not shown on the contract plans. (Reference; FCO #76.) This item was accomplished on a direct cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 841.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 DELAY IMPACT, CONTRACTOR'S DIRECT COST The Contractor encountered additional costs from precast pile operations due to unanticipated subsurface soil conditions. These costs included 36 piles added and 58 piles partially undriven due to substitution of different length piles. The different length piles were needed as a result of the varying level of the soils bearing layer necessary to support the pile foundation. It was not possible for the Contractor to drive the piles uniformly to the tip elevation that had been directed by the Districts' geotechnical consultant. Other costs included removal of an excessive amount of concrete pile cut-offs; added pile butt reinforcement bars in the 36 added piles; added move-in costs that the subcontractor experienced from moving his equipment to a different work area during re-analysis of the subsurface conditions by the Districts' geotechnical consultant; extension of piles driven too law; additional pump room piping slab costs due to relocation of several piles; and exposing the tops of buried piles for sonic integrity testing. In addition, the Contractor was delayed a total of 17 calendar days due to the time required to manufacture and install additional precast piles in the pump roam. This resulted from the varying elevation of the soils bearing layer making it necessary to install piles of a longer length in lieu of those piles that the Contractor had previously been directed to manufacture and install. Incorporated in this item are the Contractor's direct and indirect costs, together with certain incidental and consequential costs including but not limited to onsite supervision and office staff expenses. This item is pursuant to and was negotiated pursuant to Sections 10-6(b) (1) and 10-6(b)(2) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 157,987.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 `..� P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Nine 9 CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE August 11, 1988 JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT JEB . -20 RD DEMOLITION OF AD O 0 PIPINGCDIGESTERSNOS. 1, 2 R A LEANOU T : AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Item 8 ADDITIONAL PILE FOOTAGE - ADJUSTMENT OF QUANTITIES The Contractor was directed to install 1,276 linear feet of additional precast piles due to the varying level of the foundation soils bearing layer. The additional pile footage is represented as Bid Item A in the Schedule of Prices in the Contract bidding documents (an add• or delete adjustment). The unit price bid, per foot of add or deduct pile was $16.00 per foot. Therefore, this item consists of: 1,276 LF x $16/LF - $20,416.00. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 20,416.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 204,594.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 17 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any revisions to the Contract Time made by this and any previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 17 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Item 7 "E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Nine 9 CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE August 11, i 6S JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20, AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMENT OF BOILER; PIPING CLEAN U ; AND RADIN AND PAVING A PLANT N 1, J B N . P1- 1 above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses Or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date October 21, 1987 Original Contract Time 920 Calendar Days Original Completion Date April 21, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 17 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 17 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 937 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date May 14, 1990 Original Contract Price $ 31,458,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 915,219.84 This Change (Add) (DeAweg) $ ZU4,b94.UU Amended Contract Price $ JZ,b1/,t3lJ.84 Board Authorization Date: September 14, 1988 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMF�1 D BY: ( 8- r 8/22188 KI EWIT PACIFIC CO. Const uction Manager Date ACCEPTED BY: gppl By: /• / 8/22/88 „- L/ ' l• („ r 8/22/88 Contractor Date Director of- Enq ineering Date "E-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-5" �...i RESOLUTION NO. 88-125 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37 WHEREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37. NOW. THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby determine that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements; and, Section 2. That the project for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, Districts' engineers, for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, are hereby "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" approved and adopted; and, Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section S. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1988. "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" `..� RESOLUTION NO. 88-126 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JONES & STOKES ASS OCIA IN . FOR PREPARATION OF AN-EIR FOR THE WASTEWATE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MA T R PLAN FRUERAMMATLU UR A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PREPARATION OF AN EIR FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN PROGRAMMATIC EIR, DELETING SUBCONSULTANT'S SERVICES OF KINNETICS LABORATORIES, INC. AND SUBSTITUTING JONES & STOKES PERSONNEL FOR SAID WORK t t f t f t t f t f f t f f f < f WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Element of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Programmatic EIR; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. to delete the marine subconsultant services of Kinnetics Laboratories, Inc. and substitute Jones &.Stokes' personnel for said work. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, 00 HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated September 14, 1988, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated March 9, 1988, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. , for preparation of an Environmental Impact "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "6-1" Report for the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities element of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Waster Plan Programmatic Environmental Impact Report, deleting the marine subconsultant services of Kinnetics Laboratories, Inc. and substituting Jones 8 Stokes' personnel for said work, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said substitution shall not change the maximum authorized compensation of $213,126.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1988. „G-2„ AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS ^G-Z^ RESOLUTION NO 88-127 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH HUNTINGTON BEACH WETLANDS CONSERVANCY, ET AL. RE EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY INTERESTS AND EASEMENTS AT DISTRICT PLANT NO. 2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3 , 5 , 6 , 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH WETLANDS RESTORATION PLAN, THE IMPROVEMENT OF ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FACILITIES AT THE SANTA AMA RIVER AND TALBERT VALLEY CHANNELS, AND THE TRANSFER OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR CONSERVATION PURPOSES BY SANITATION DISTRICTS TO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH WETLANDS CONSERVANCY WITH A RESERVATION TO DISTRICTS OF RIGHTS TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN NECESSARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND SUPPORT FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 + + + x x WHEREAS, the Orange County Flood Control District owns and maintains certain flood control facilities in the vicinity of Districts' Plant No. 2 , including the Talbert Valley Channel System and the Ocean Outlet for said System; and, WHEREAS,, the Flood Control District has developed a Plan to improve the Talbert Valley Channel System and to implement a Plan for the restoration and enhancement of .the Wetlands located in the vicinity of the Talbert Valley Channel and the Sanitation District Plant No . 2 , as prepared by the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy, together with making improvements to the Flood Control District ' s properties and the Sanitation Districts' properties; and, WHEREAS, the Sanitation Districts' properties are needed, in part, by the Flood Control District and the Wetlands Conservancy to implement the new Flood Control Plan and the Conservancy Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Sanitation Districts have determined that they "4-1" AENDA ITEM #°(f) - .ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" can provide an easement for Conservancy purposes to the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy to allow for the implementation of its Conservancy Plan and the Flood Control District Plan, provided that Sanitation Districts are allowed continued joint uses of their properties and facilities for the development and future maintenance of their wastewater treatment and support facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 3 , 5 , 6, 7 , 11 , 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That certain Agreement by and among the Orange County Flood Control District , the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy, the State Coastal Conservancy, United States of America Fish & Wildlife Service - United States Department of Interior , State of California Department of Fish & Game , California Coastal Commission, City of Huntington Beach, and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, providing for the development of improved flood control facilities, the implementation of the Huntington Beach Wetlands Restoration Plan, and the transfer of a Conservancy easement by the County Sanitation Districts to the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy is hereby approved.. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held Sepcember 14 , 1988. (B50) "H-Z" AGENDA IT=M K9M - ALL DISTRICTS "4-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA iE P.O. BOX$127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-6127 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708.7018 (714)062.2411 September 1, 1988 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates in Connection with Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-26-3 and Katella Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-28 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Willdan Associates for the preparation of design and plans and specifications and construction services for Portion of Euclid Interceptor , Sewer, Contract No. 2-26-3 and Katella Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-28, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $112,746. Engineering Services, (hourly rates Including labor plus overhead at 170%) , not to exceed $ 81,380 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 16,660 Fixed Profit 14,706 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $ 112,746 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. "Buck" Catlin /s/William D. Mahone A. B. "Buck" Catlin am . a oney District No. 2 Chairman District No. Chairman pro tem Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "I" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "I" RESOLUTION NO. 88-129-2 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF CONTRACTSNOS. 2-26-3 AND 2-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES REQUIRED RE PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER, BETWEEN BROADWAY AND ORANGETHORPE AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 2-26-3, AND KATELLA RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN - EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT STREET, CONTRACT NO. 2-28 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with Willdan Associates for design and construction services required re Portion of Euclid Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3, and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on July 13, 1988, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed Professional Services Agreement is for projects which are included in Amendment No. 1 to the Consolidated Master Plan "J 1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g)(2) - DISTRICT 2 "J-1" of Trunk Sewers for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11. '.The projects are to be designed as per the Master Plan approval . In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 15090 of the District's CEQA Guidelines, a Final Focused Environmental. Impact Report for Amendment No. 1 covering these projects was approved by the District's Board of Directors on June 10, 1987; and Section 2. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated September 14, 1988, by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 and Willdan Associates, for design and construction services required re Portion of Euclid Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3, and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 3. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor including overhead at 170%, not to exceed $ 81,380.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 16,660.00 Fixed Profit 14,706.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $112,746.00 Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in farm approved by the General Counsel . - PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1988. "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(9) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "J-2` S eXOe CITY OF ORANGE ee••eee ORANGE CIVIC CENTER • 300 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE • ORANGE,CALIFORNIA 92666 • POST OFFICE BOX 449 OFFICE OF CRY MANAGER (714)532-0321 July 29, 1988 Gary Streed Orange County Sanitation District P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Re: Orange Redevelopment Agency Dear Mr. Streed: Following review of the materials submitted by the staff of the Orange County Sanitation District, the following offer is made on behalf of the Orange Redevelopment Agency relative to the redevelopment plane/amendments recently adopted: (a) Amendment No. One to the Tustin Street Redevelopment Plan: the Agency proposes to pass-through to the District one-third (1/3) of that portion of tax increment resulting from application of the District's share of the property tax roll as received by the Orange Redevelopment Agency from the area added by Amendment No. One; - (b) Amendment No. Two to the Southwest Redevelopment Plan: the Agency proposes to pass-through to the District one-third (1/3) of that portion of tax increment resulting from application of the District's share of the property tax roll as received by the Orange Redevelopment Agency from the area added by Amendment No. Two; (c) Northwest Redevelopment Plan: the Agency proposes to pass-through to the District one-third (1/3) of that portion of tax increment resulting from application of the District's share of the property tax roll as received by the orange Redevelopment Agency from the Northwest Redevelopment Project Area. CELEBRATING 100 YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY "K-]." AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "K 1" Gary Streed �✓ Orange Co. Sanitation District July 29, 1988 Page Two After you have confirmed that these terms are acceptable, we will prepare documentation to be approved by your Board; once your Board has taken formal action to approve the agreements and executed copies are returned to this office, the agreements will be placed on an upcoming agenda of the Orange Redevelopment Agency for formal action. Sincerely, 3. William Little City Manager JWL:pm "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #0(h)(1) - DISTRICT 2 "IK-2" RESOLUTION NO. 88-130-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE REDEVELOPMENT NCY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENTS WITH ORANGE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RE PAYMENT OF PROPORTIONAL ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT TO DISTRICT FOR SERVICES x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x WHEREAS, the Orange Redevelopment Agency has proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Tustin Street Redevelopment Plant, Amendment No. 2 to the Southwest Redevelopment Plan and the Northwest Redevelopment Plan; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Community Redevelopment Law, California Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq. , the Sanitation Districts' ad valorem taxes In the redevelopment project areas will be frozen at the 1988-89 base year levy; all subsequent annual tax increments accruing to the redevelopment agency during its life; and, WHEREAS, because the Sanitation Districts rely on ad valorem taxes to finance the cast of sewerage services which are escalating due to federally mandated requirements, energy impacts and inflationary trends; and, WHEREAS, recognizing that the.freezing of taxes may result in inadequate ad valorem tax revenues to cover the cost of providing sewerage service to the redevelopment project areas, representatives of the Orange Redevelopment Agency have agreed to pay the District one-third of its proportional share of the annual tax increment accruing to the agency to defray the cost of said service, on the same basis as other properties in the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreements dated by and "L-1" AGENDA. ITEM #9(h) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "L-1" between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and the Orange Redevelopment Agency, providing for payment to the District of one-third of its proportional share of the annual tax increment from property in proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Tustin Street Redevelopment Plan, Amendment No. 2 to the Southwest Redevelopment Plan and the Northwest Redevelopment Plan, to pay for escalating costs of sewerage service on the same basis as other properties in the District, be, and are hereby, approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute said agreements on behalf of District No. 2 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1988. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "L-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2� P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Three CONTRACTOR: Mladen Buntich Construction Company . DATE August JOB: Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. Amount of this Change Order (Add) '(Deduet) $ 26,500.00 In accordance with Contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Section 50-8 of the contract specifications provides for a $500.00 per day bonus for certain manholes completed before the specified time of completion. This change order provides compensation for early completion of two "bonus manholes" which have been completed since Change Order No. 2 (Item No. 4) was executed on March 12, 1988 for bonuses on four manholes. Manhole No. Specified Time Actual Time Bonus Time Bonus Due 8 40 Days 12 Days 28 Days $ 14,000.00 30 40 Days 15 Days 25 Days $ 12,500.00 $ 26, 00. TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 26,500.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any revisions to the Contract Time made by this and any previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for the Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(1 ) - DISTRICT 3 "M-1" `..� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92798 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C.O. NO. Three CONTRACTOR: Mladen Buntich Construction Company DATE August , JOB: Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-2 - SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract ate July 9, 1987 Original Contract Time 750 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 27, 1989 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 16 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 766 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date August 2, 1989 Original Contract Price $ 4,327,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes 8-73,33 .94 This Change (Add) Weduet) 5— Amended Contract Price S 4,42-6,8T Board Authorization Date: September 14, 1988 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 0 RECOMMENDED BY: onst ction Manager MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY L ACCEPTED BY: APPRO .. i + ntr c br erector ot Engineering "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - DISTRICT 3 "M-2" RESOLUTION NO. 88-131-3 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 3-34R A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS AND STREET REPAIRS ON KNOTT INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-34R * * t t # # # # # t # k k The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. In accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Board of Directors, June 8, 1988, authorized filing a Notice of Exemption in connection with the proposed project for Manhole Adjustments and Street Repairs on Knott Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. .3-34R; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Mladen Buntich Construction Co. for Manhole Adjustments and Street Repairs on Knott Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-34R, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Manhole Adjustments and Street Repairs on Knott Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-34R, be awarded to Mladen Buntich Construction Co. in the total amount of $369,010.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1988. "N" AGENDA ITEM #9( j ) - DISTRICT 3 N" RESOLUTION NO. 88-132 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 5-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 5-31 > t ! f Y f f f[ f R * 1t f f t f WHEREAS, Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the project for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, is hereby approved. Said project was included in the Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6, approved by the Boards of Directors on June 13, 1984. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on July 27, 1984, in accordance with the District's Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, Districts' engineers, for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "0-1" and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1988. "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "0-2" . PETITION FOR ANNEXATION .. Date: 5-26-88 �. . 70: Board of Directors `...� Crz my Sanitation District No. 7 . P. O. Box 81.27 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-01.27 ._ :I. (We), the.undersigned Iandoaner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex Griffin - 0.50 acres; Pomeroy - 0.53 acres . , of territory to the District located in the vicinity of Foothill Blvd. 6 La Quests s Lemon We. Dr. in Lemon Heights, Orange County (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of Unincorporated territory , more particularly (Indicate city or unincorporated territory) described and shown on the 1FGAD DESCRIPTION and MAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with Gtr ffin - 2240,Foo hil�B�vo�prgcVures. The street address of the property is: Pomeroy - 2242 Foothill Blvd., S.A. The reason for the proposed annexation is: convert private res. with septic syefem to n,�hlir�awe' eyetem Said property is _Inhabited / X Uninhabited. Number of registered Voters, Griffin- 2 Griffin - 212, 160 if any: The assessed value of the property is: $ pow-3 omero'P�y - 5,U80 Also enclosed are the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL (UF GNNAIRE required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if . appropriate) and a check in the amount of $500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexition should be sent to the following: Hugh M. Griffin Lesson Pomeroy ZZ111 N. teen ea vista Del Santa Ana, CA 92708 Santa Ana, Tele: 714-543-0979 Tale: (714) 832- 89 SIGNATURE OF IAEDUMER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF dANDaA7N R X ]. !". %'::L 17 2218 N. Greenleaf St. Hugh M. Griffin.- - Santa Ana, CA 92706 Name (Typed or tad) ,upp.M 11222 Vista Del Lago Le on F. Pomeroy I Santa Ana, CA 92705 or pri ). I AGENDA ITEM #9(m) ��DISTRICT 7 "P-1" RESOLUTION NO. 88-134-1_ �. AUTHORIZING INITITATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND ILAPPLICATIUff-76-L-AFCU-ffE-A-NNYRATM OF TERRITORY TO DISTRICTN (ANNEXA 9T T-G� FIti TT-PUM R ANNtAA1 PUN) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS ANNEXATION NO. 127 - GRIFFIN-POMEROY ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 * * *, * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That proceedings are hereby authorized to be initiated by District No. 7, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange. County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory designated at "Annexation No. 127 - Griffin-Pomeroy Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution, according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in this resolution in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985; and, , Section 2. That this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; and, Section 3. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately .96 acres of territory to District No. 7 in the vicinity south of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated 4.r/ "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(m) - DISTRICT 7 "P-2^ County territory, to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as requested by Hugh M. Griffin and Lesson F. Pomeroy III, owners of said property; and, Section 4. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That this proposal is consistent with the adopted sphere of influence of the affected District; and, Section 6. That proposed Annexation No. 127 shall be subject to the condition that all fees required to be paid to the District must be satisfied prior to completion of the annexation proceedings; and, 'Section 7. That -the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1988. "P- �' AGENDA ITEM #9(m) - DISTRICT 7 "P-3" RESOLUTION NO. 88-133-7 APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH DARLE E J. FIELDS, dba D. J. & ASSOCIATES RE bhWhR LINE IN CIRCULA PANORAMA STREET FRYING 23 LOTS WITHIN TRACTS 939 AND 91 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH DARLENE J. FIELDS, DOING BUSINESS AS D. J. & ASSOCIATES, RE SEWER LINE IN CIRULA PANORAMA STREET SERVING 23 LOTS LOCATED WITHIN TRACTS NOS. 939 AND 916 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Reimbursement Agreement for Sewer Line in Circula Panorama Street dated , by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and Darlene J. Fields, doing business as D. J. & Associates, - providing for reimbursement of costs to developer by the District for construction of a sewer line in Circula Panorama Street which will serve 23 lots located within Tracts Nos. 939 and 916, is .hereby approved and accepted;- and, Section 2. That reimbursement of said costs .to developer, based on $3,778.83 per lot for 14 lots (5 of the 23 lots are owned by developer and 4 lots have already paid their share of the sewer line costs) , is hereby . authorized to be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of said Reimbursement Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1988. "0" AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICT 7 "p" RESOLUTION NO.- 88-128 RECEIVING AND REJECTING SOLE BID FOR JOB N0. P1-27 D AUTHORIZING THE NEGOTIATION OF A CONTRACT TO PERFORM THE WORK A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, RECEIVING AND FILING THE BID TABULATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION RE ENTRANCES, SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27; REJECTING THE SOLE BID RECEIVED FOR SAID PROJECT; DETERMINING THAT THE WORK CAN BE COMPLETED AT A LESSER PRICE BY NEGOTIATION IN THE OPEN MARKET; AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH A QUALIFIED CONTRACTOR IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,600,000.00 WHEREAS, pursuant to approval of plans and specifications by the Boards of Directors, a notice inviting bids for the construction of Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, was advertised and sealed bids called for to be received August 23, 1988; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said notice inviting bids, the Districts received one bid in the amount of $1,772,281.00 submitted by G. A. MacDonald Construction Company, Inc., which exceeded the engineering estimate of $1,500,000.00; and, WHEREAS, work to be performed under this contract is principally road construction and traffic signalization, but also includes other trades and disciplines, including piping, landscaping, electrical and removal and relocation of waste facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and .14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the singular bid of G. A. MacDonald Construction Company, Inc. is considerably higher than the engineering estimate which has been determined to be a reasonable and accurate estimation of costs. "s-ill AG-NDA ITEM #11.(,:) - ALL DT$TplfTc C_ Section 2: That the bid of G. A. MacDonald Construction Company, Inc. is hereby rejected as being excessive. Section 3: The work to be performed under Job No. PI-27 can be performed more economically and the materials, supplies and labors furnished at a lower price in the open market. Section 4: That pursuant to California Public Contracts Code Section 20783, the Districts' staff is authorized to negotiate a contract with a qualified contractor to perform all of the work specified in Job No. P1-27, in an amount not to exceed $1,600,000.00. Section 5: The negotiated contract shall be presented to the Boards of Directors for approval prior to execution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1988. "S-i" AGENDAIT=M #'_].(r) - ALL DISTOTrTS "S-2" ORDINANCE NO. 207 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF �✓ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 205 ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 206 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the District; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992; and, C. That the new connection fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992; and, D. That the formation of District No. 13 having been completed, with sewer service being provided by District No. 13 to all properties within its boundaries, there is no further need for District No. 2 to provide service and levy a charge therefore as provided in District Ordinance No. 206. NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Section 702 of Ordinance No. 205 is hereby amended to read: 11702. DISTRICT NO. 2 CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit Required. No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an "T-1" AGENDA ITEM #27(c) - DISTRICT 2 "T-1" established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued V.✓ which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charge Amounts. The following District connection charges are hereby established commencing December 1, 1988, and shall be paid to the District or to an agency designated by the District: (1) Connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (2) Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling buildin,i, the connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (3) Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500. (4) Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall he calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (1) and (3) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. "T-2 AGENDA ITEM #27(C) - DISTRICT 2 "T-2" (5) Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units." Section 2. Ordinance No. 206 is hereby repealed. Section 3. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE Board of •Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held Chairman of the oard o hectors County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Boar of D rectors County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California ' "T-3" AGENDA ITEM #27(c) - DISTRICT 2 "T-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS PI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA `/ tpS EL4S Pp 90P 8127@J PpyNl4N VPLLEY.WLROPNa 827294127 VICS82.i4n 8/23/88 STAFF REPORT D19UC�2 DISTRICT'S CONNECTION P—fE OAR A FOR CAPITAL FINANCING Background In 1986 the Board approved the issuance of Certificates of Participation in the amount of $44,300,000 as a means of providing some of the funds needed for the costs of providing facilities to keep pace with the stringent requirements of federal and state regulatory agencies for advanced treatment and the need to provide additional capacity to meet the increasing demands on the sewerage system. However, connection fees charged to new development are currently the primary source of new capital funds for the District. During the 1988-89 Budget process, staff advised the Directors that an increase in connection fees would need to be evaluated in the current year to reflect the cost of providing sewerage system capacity, and that a Supplemental User Fee program would probably need to be implemented in 1990-91. Connection Fee Review Staff has recently completed a review of connection fees throughout the Districts based on an analysis of the historical costs of planning, designing and constructing facilities both in the individual Districts' collection systems and in the joint works treatment and disposal facilities. The current cost of providing collection system and joint works capacity ranges from $1,485 to $1,688 per unit for a single family/multi-family unit and from $297 to S337 per 1,000 square feet of commercial , industrial, governmental and other types of office facilities. To reflect .the current cost of providing sewerage system capacity, the several Districts have been systematically increasing their connection fee schedules. The amounts of S1,500/$3OO have been determined to be the appropriate fee In part to simplify administration of the fees by the cities who collect them on behalf of the Districts. Because the cities cross District boundaries, a consistent fee schedule is much easier to administer. Exhibit 1 presents a sunEnary of the current connection fees in the other individual Districts. Districts 1, 5, 6, 11 and 13 have already taken actions to increase their basic connection fees, and District 3 is phasing an increase of its fees to $1,500/$300. Districts 7 and 13 are also considering fee increases at this time. �..✓ Staff has also recently completed an evaluation of the appropriate connection fee levels for the District 2 share of the costs of expanding both the joint works treatment facilities and the District's collection system. Staff's analysis indicates that the basic fee for new connections to pay the costs of "L'-1" AGENDA ITEM #27(C)UJ - DiSTRTCT 2 ^U-)_^ Page TNo 8/23/88 the treatment facility expansion and the master-planned collection system should be consistent with the fees in the other Districts, and should reflect the flow ratios prevalent in the other Districts as follows: Dwelling Units Non-Residential Facilities $1,500/DU $300/1,000 sq. ft. Cash Flow Comparison Schedule A, Statement of Projected Cash Flow (excerpted from the District 2 1988-89 budget), presents the District's financial position assuming the District's existing connection fee schedule remains in place for the next ten years. Line 30, Reserves and Carry-over to Next Year, indicates that the District's capital funds will experience a deficit of ($12,416,000) by the end of fiscal year 1990-91 and will continue to operate at a deficit accumulating to $77,754,000 over the next several years unless connection fees are increased or other revenue sources such as debt financing via revenue bonds/certificates of participation are employed to generate additional capital funds. Schedule B presents the District's financial position using the proposed basic connection fee of $1,500/$300 effective January 1, 1989. Line 30, Schedule B, indicates that the District would maintain a strong positive cash position in its capital fund through fiscal 1990-91 and could potentially reduce the projected deficit by $48.2 million over the ten-year period. However, it is anticipated that the connection fee schedule will continue to escalate to keep pace with the rising cost of providing sewerage system capacity, further reducing the projected capital funding shortfalls. The projections for both cash flows assume that all construction projects proceed on schedule. Thus, the estimates can be considered "worst case" scenarios. However, we continue to experience delays in major projects such as the Central Power Generating System because of SCAOMD requirements. Further delays in this $53 million project of which District 2's share is $15.2 million, would also delay, or at least spread out, the need to raise capital funds. The same is true for other capital projects. Conversely, as the Directors are aware, if the EPA does not renew the secondary treatment waiver in 1990, the District's capital needs will increase substantially. Work to date by the consultants on the "Action Plan for Balanced Environmental Management: Preserving Orange County's Coastal Ocean Waters," which includes as a major element an update of the facilities required to meet federal and state treatment requirements and accommodate the projected growth in our service area, indicates that major capital expansion will be required regardless of the treatment alternative ultimately implemented. The Action Plan will also recommend financing methods of which connection fees will only be one component, basically to pay for facilities required to serve new development. Other major financing mechanisms include issuance of debt and a capital facilities charge as a component of annual user fees. "U-2" AGENDA ITEM k27(c) ( 1) - DISTRICT 2 Page Three `.. 8/23/88 Recommendations Staff recommends the Directors increase the connection fee to $1,500 per dwelling unit and $300 per square foot of non-residential buildings, effective as soon as possible, to reflect the current cost of providing sewerage system capacity. Further changes to the long-range capital financing plan should be held in abeyance pending completion of the Action Plan for Balanced Environmental Management. "U-3" AGENDA ?T M #27(^) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "U-3" EXHIBIT 1 8/17/88 8/23188 CSOOC EXISTING CONNECTION FEES Single/Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial/ District/Zone Dwelling Units Governmental/Other 1 $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 $ 220 per dwelling $ 45 per 1,000 sq. ft. 3* $1,000 per dwelling - $ 200 per 1,000 sq. ft. 5 _ $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 6 , $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 7: Zone 1 $ 250 per dwelling $ 50 per 1,000 sq. ft. Zone 2 $ 250 per dwelling S 180 per 1,000 sq. ft. Trunk Connection Charges: Residential - $6/front foot charge plus $250 per dwelling unit; minimum $400 plus $250/dwelling unit. Commercial - $10/front foot charge plus $50/1,000 sq. ft. floor area; minimum $500 per $50/1,000 sq. ft. 11 $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 13: Zone A Variable (fees to be the same as District 2 or 7) Zone B $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. Zone C $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. * Scheduled to increase'to $1,500/$300 on July 1, 1989 "U-4" AGENDA ITEM #27(c)(1) - DISTRICT 2 "U-4" . SCHEDULE A [WRIT Uw1AHOW DISTRICT go. 2 621310 , SURDART Of PROJECTED MR KID PWI I C TIME TEARS 1921•89 TUOUGR H11•118 I IW!•91� LINE IWI•0 I9119•90 ..... . ...... IMt•U S-Inr lent IWl•91 Well, Total Llw -•OPERATING FIAT ' I R....ad.TO...T-Dal fr.lost Tsar ❑.1.W,W0 I2.205,00 9,fOt,00o 6,51A0W waylaid i U,UDpW 11,Ut.0W1 13.610,000 1 ••-•_"-"-. ......-... .......... . ........... ...»..... I --------— ___—_ ----.------ REVENUE 2 Sol,.of It to A iNalioa /1I33.W0 1.03110110 4.701,00 9,5411.011 10.379.00 U,221.OW 61,130,0U 111.351,0411 1 J Ease: lanstrsal West, 2,513,000 2.92/.00 3.163.000 3.U7.00 1,117,004 i 17,111,000 34,479.000 51.623,001, 3 1 Interest 6 Xiul11e0.a Ina. 916.0W 781,000 582.00 293.00 0 i 2,SI5,OW 1 2475.000 1 S at.,R.nn, 0 0 5 n 1 TOTAL REVENUE 10.192,OU ll.1W.0U 12,729,U0 IMMUNE 14.026.000 i 63.1143,00 101,6W,W0 115.5210110 1 G-a _...... ......... ........... .......... .-......... • ........... ..�..».. ....».»» Z 1 TOTAL AVAIlOAI[ fUN01Xi 21,322.0114 U,913.010 22.63S.OW W.^O,oW 16,U7,001 ; 17,313,U0 97,153,OW 171.626,OU 7 p ......... .......... ........ ........... 2 ----------- ...-•---._ ......... n WWNDnWU -1 B sell,of him Gore,A a c 11.468.00 13.II1,001) 15,161,W0 17, 41.m 28,0s1,OW 71,111.aW 15.517.0011 232.U1.M I m 9 collection system A s 0 and other Mr. 11/,W0 WW.00 931,OW 1.013.M I.M.M 3 I,IWOW 6.710.00 U.519,OW 9 3 10 One, nnrdilnn a 0 to ...»--'-.. ---"...... .......... ........... ------ ........--- ._......_ ro H TOTAL EXPENDITURES 12,3H,0W 1I.07,40 11.I23.000 10.I5t..O 21,143.00 U•129.0ao U2.217.000 244.3U.oW U �1 .......... .......... ........... .......... ........... 1 »»....--- ........... ..--..»... f"Y 12 Rears 1 nary-Over to Rest Year 1262WN0 9.905,000 1.512.000 1.711.000 21,556,1001 I 11,5U.OU) 45.I11,0001 (65.174,0001 12 H Nett lea's Dry period luadia0 NOaoi..nls 1,159,W0 r 1.011.010 1•062.400 9.230.00 10.512,00 i 10,512,00 21.911,OW 10.941.00 13 •......_-- .......... .....----- ........... ........... ) ..»------. .».-..---- ..--...--.. H Fort defended or (Oe55ti1) 6,016,OW 2.aU.0U (1.5W.W0) (7.169,0W) (IS.I2B.400) I (IS.IW.m) (U,115,W01 (86,II5,0W) 1/ v ^svu ••a I nPITAI. W(S) .........._- 15 after:..s Caere-.., free lest Tell W,11B4OIG 47.172.000 15.121.000 132,411.0001 122.511.OW) I W.III.OW IW.610.Ml 00.048.00 IS r� ........... r ..-------- ----------- -1 Review f"t 16 coeslrution Groat, HI,WO HO,WD IW.000 I0 —1 17 To.: un.tlin 050.000 B50.M 150.00 150.00 elo.oll 1.250.1411 1.150.08 1.510.6011 U II InduSVnl RISEN 11041.00 LH1.ow 1,311.1100 1.561.oU 1.3::.OW 1 7.02I.00 14.124.00 21.145.00 10 N 19 5,I4,01 "wity Rights 1.365.0W 1351001) 390.00 EXISTS 1.661.00 i 1.111.001) I31,0W MEDA , It 20 leer.,1 Ai,telnne.e In.e 1.551,000 1,251.000 117,010 0 0 I 6.925AW 0 6.925.401, W 21 liner-lied Nnhr 59.00 $9,000 $9.000 21 It other I.e. 341.00 301,00 301,00 22 ...._.... .----..... ----------- -......... ........... i ........... --- ........... 21 TOTAL REs'EWE 1,969.00 4,431,00 ..134.000 GAME$ 1,319,aW 21.110.000 11.411.0110 15,151.01111 23 •-........ ........... ........... .......... ........... i ----------- ........... ---------. 21 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 111.817.0411 U,W5.0W 11.112,Wa (1,WI.OW) (11.205,40) 2 107,611,010 111.861,OW) I26.1991000 21 .._....... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...»-..... ........... .»........ EXPENDITURES 25 sMrs of )@lot Inn Irel.eet Pna1 21.351,0110 22,U1.OW 19,849.000 10.191.000 7.903,01,11 ! 11,161.OW Y.716,OW 125120.000 n 26 District Wllatioe EVIL. 10.550,00 4,915.00 1,065.000 1.375.000 475,000 I 29.I00.OW 9,250•oW 311I30.011 t1 21 CUP 9a...an. 4.141.00 4.1911.00 4.164.000 ,4.124,00 1.415,01, i lo.n2.00 19.U1.OW 10,511,00 21 C W Other Immiturn 0 0 U I Vl t9 Taint ElptIDImts 12,U5.OW U.177,010 30,e7B.0W 16,19J.000 12.113.OW i IW.3U,W0 65,0U.wo 201,253.0W 29 ........... ........... ........... ........... .........» ) ........... ......... ........... W Rnenn 1 GnPa.f an INel Far 11,1tt.OW IS,ttB4OW II2.1I6.001) I23,Sst.0U1 (JOdiB4OWI i IW.110,100) (77,154,00) 171.754,001 X SCHEDULE A C CMTI WITATIOl1 OBSCURE MO- 1 0113111 STATEMENT Of PROJECTED CASK FLOP Uge 1 FISCAL yEPAS 1908-19 TRR06N 1991.93 1993-941 tTAF 1906-99 1999-90 I990-91 1991-12 1991-91 5-yen TOUT 1991-91 10-1ear Iota) JIBE ------- ------- __... .._... i .._...----- _._.... ........_-. .... done FRO(S) 31 Innns t U111-0981 Iran,last Tear 111,000 0 0 0 0 111,000 0 111,000 31 ........... ......... .......... ..___. .._....... , ...._.... __.�_ �_...-.- REVEBUE 32 TIN ten 0 0 JI A Interest{MisnlUnws Iww. 11,009 0 0 0 0 1 11,000 0 11,000 AS 31 Olnr Iwwe 0 AI G� AS Tofu REVENUE 11.m 0 0 0 0 14.000 1 11,000 SI m ——_. .__------ ----------- ------- ------..._ I ------- .—..._ .......... z p 36 TOTAL PYPILP/l[iWDIR{ 131,w0 0 0 0 0 ) IL,000 0 I50,00 J6 WINDOWS m 11 Beat hindiwl { IntereAt 399,001, 391.000 391,Ow IF 3 1B Inlerfund Tnwllr 59.000 51,000 59,000 AI 39 Other Eaoe.lilures A9 , N V 10 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 49.00 0 0 0 0 ISB.000 0 456,00 10 �.., 1t Aessrves{Carq-Over to Iexl In1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II /^ 12 Next Texr's Dry Period loading AeOuirntnex 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 If [ U Iwd Wan.Or lodisit) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 n ::::::::::: ::::::::::: p SUMMIT lAdj951sd for Ialer-Sand Trnsfers) Cn 11 Aexel...t Urr,-Oar Irw Lan Ynr 91.932.000 59.971.000 25.631.000 (5.901.000) (3.73S.000) 1 94,911.000 (35.231,000) 91193I,I00 11 —i 4S TOTAL REVENUE 19.215.000 16,111.000 15.163.000 10,n1,d00 19.165.000 1 90.111,000 120,110,000 211.211.000 13 A .. .. .. ... n 16 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 114.197.00 16,191.0w 11.07,000 11,169.04 11.61B,Cw) 1 IBS.119,000 IS.136.000 3061119,000 1{ —1 11 IDIAl EIPENDIIMEA S1,320,000 U.561,Cw 11,0 LICE 31,951.3w 11.616,000 I 2A0.951,00e 313,114,000 449.0,11,000 Il .......__ ........... ........... ........... ........... 1 --------_. .__..... .......... N 10 Rn..... {Uny-09u to MAIL Inv 59,971,000 23.611,000 (5.901,00) 120.783.001 ❑5 2BI.o001 (35,I34,0101 II42,918,0001 (112.929.000) 11 19 Neal lea's Art levied fund,.,WailenAgo 6.159.000 1,011,000 6.012.000 9.230.w0 10.511:000 1 10.512.000 1Q911,0w 10.911,000 19 50 FUND BALANCE OA (DEFICIT) 51.818.000 10.590.000 (13.966.000) 130,011.0001 (45.806.0001 i (15.806.006) (163.069.00) (164.869.000) IO C SCHEDULE A ■(I\ ( C= SCHEDULE OF MTV SKIt0t10N DISTINCT NO. I B/6111 t11TUNT Of MMECIED GM Fin hq+1 FISCAL V[wl 1181-19 MARVIN 1991-91 IM3-911 LINE 1988-99 1989-90 1990.11 1991.9I 1MI.13 f-Ye+: mist 1997-18 10-Ye11 local LINE --•- _..--• ....... ....... ....... .._». H ._--------- ----------- ..-..-.....— .--- Him MD(S) 31 burns I Urn-War From List Tear 444.00 0 0 0 0 i I0,001 0 41000 11 ........... D "SUE art 31 1..may 0 1 JI Z 13 Mlrlwt 1 Diwellaewm Imase MODEL 0 0 1 0 H 1/,000 0 14.0 N 51 OtWr IN R. 0 N !S IMK I[Y[IK MORE !0 0 1 0 0 11 ......� . _....._.. -«.•. _. _OM _..11.M1 ._._...0 »_..»... 3 N IDEAL IV01WlE FUAOIIC IMAM 0 0 0 0 : IM.OM 0 01.040 11 N 6D[wITDR6 31 Iona a+54a5a11 I IK+rKt N1.OM JM,MO IM,was 11 n N 101.1-taw IKMter S1,M1 M,MO M.OM N $1 Olstr (Mwlwwf 39 ......... ........ ........ .. ------._ _........ .__..... .......... w TOOK IMINDHMES IM.OM 0 1 .....1 0 4111.141, 0 13.1110 M .--....... ....».._. ...»....» ...-.»._. ...»..... ----»'---. ._.._..-. ........_. U IKaran I calls,... M Hit I... 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 11 t7 10 pit Year'1 Orr Nioa mstlM Isom"Owelf 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 42 .. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... (n 13 Fast 1.1a91 ar I0d51itl D 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 311tttltF.t vuzn mi: VsVnVV.nr 3MNwr IN01w110 is, lOwr9uw wastlml 14 IawKes 1 LirIY'W11 Ira List tlw K.9M.M0 62,141400 U,SII,MO I,eM.W II,IM.CMI 11,1II,10 111.155. M1 14.,r. 00 11 N 15 TOTAL REVENUE II,431A1) II.H1.00 I11110.94 21.011.040 MILLION) 111.216.00 I45.1501000 NLIILMI aS ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... .......... , ........--. ....._.». lo t01AL-wNILiKE FMINI 111."I'm 11.011.0" 54AC M 12.702.000 :LMI,OM 201,191.040 133.395:3M 351J11,040 41 11 106E EN9NDOwIS SLR0.:0 M,SNiM 6,0IA10 34,1L:00 N.111.00 : :50.95J.M0 229.114.011 119,:II.M1 41 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... q its,... 1 U,,-ovo9 w am Year ILIOL M 31.511::M 1,A3.:00 II.:M.M01 .11.155.0401 IILMf,9M1 194.119.001 111.'II300I 11 .1 lost Iw1'$Orr 9w1w Few+y lowarnnu 0-IM.W 1.w1.M0 I.MI.OM 9,:3D. M 10.51I.0,11 10.5G,00 21.911.010 20.911.001 11 _......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... M FUND wlwc[M IO FICIII N.31I .%: 56110.1I1, I37I.I401 IIt.iM.OMI I:I.321.M l IMJILOMI III5.661.0101 1115ad.01t M ........... ttl..x.e.s. .l..l.l.... .t.l....t.a .xlvx...... ....1...... C V SCHEDULE 5 SCHEDULE B CAINtY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SENIOR C SGTENINI Of PROJECTED CAN FLM - Pop 1 FISCAL YEARS 1911-N THROW 1997-98 p IM1-NI 111E ...I-N INS." ..M•91 IMI.91 119M! 1-INr IliaM." to-VAR,IeGI LINE -.--OPERAII19 MO ---'---------- i 1 ANN".A GnpOYer AN Wl I0. Il,{M.MI II,MS.MO 9.M.m 6SI2,M0 1,161.90 i IS.6M,M0 II,SM.MII 13,630,NO 1 .._.._. .».»_... .......... ........... _-....__ ; -_-.._-.. .......... ......--"-- AEYEM 7 SM'.o1 IS tN Allocamn 1.OS.MO I.OM.M9 $.IN.TIE 9,546.010 10d19.140 i 44,221.M1 41.131.4411, 111.19.010 1 J fxs: IoMtlui Nste ANI.000 2,126.M0 S.M.MO 1,0I.01, 1,N1,M1 1 11,I41,0 N,6N.M0 $1,621.00 1 1 IMINt s 1isc.Il+Nxs 1.. 914.000 IN.= SM.Mo Ml.NO 0 i I,SIS.MI 0 i,515,M0 1 S MAN Inum I 0 S ........... ""'------- ----------- ........... ......... ..--''---» »-------- ........... Ll 6 folm MYENOE to M.MO II.lM.MO 12.1:9.0M I3,1M.0M 11.126.10,11 63.10.11411 101.69.9M 165452.00 6 m ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ........ _......... ......... Z I TOTAL AYAILAILE NMINc 26.522.904 11.M7.MI M.NS.f00 M,tM.OM 16.541,00, : 11.5/1.0101 91,MS.MO 171.626.000 1 Rom. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... : ........... ........... ........... n EXMNDIIMES -I I Sure al IMF wits 01 0 ILN1.9M I1.111 M 15.I61AM 11.111.OM M.OM M 77.121.1414, I55.511.0M 232.11LOOD 1 m 9 tolled.SYstx e 1 0 6m Meer our. N9.OM 90/.M0 9M.M0 1.011•041 I.M6.MD 1,M9.M1 6,110.001 11.519.000 9 3 1e MANY Exaxltarn I 0 II ........... ........... ........... "---'----- ........... ----------- .»....---- ........... N II TOTAL EXPENOITMES 15.117,010 II.N1.M0 16,121,MI 11.159.M0 1I.I6,144, 12.129.000 1M.2M.OM 211.151.0M 11 V ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... i ---------- ........... ........... ("f 12 1Nerxs 6G.TOrer to Ant THAT 12.:IS.:M 9.1M•MI 012.4410 I.MI.OM •1,556.000J : 14.516.001411 IM,111,M01 165.!11.e101 12 • IJ AN. nn's 0" PAT'"IRAN'Aewvxsts 4.119.001 7.N1.01/ I.07AM 9.210,40 10.572.MI 11.511.0M 20.14.0011 N.711,00 IS �v. ........... ........... ......... ........... ........... ; ........... --........ .....--I.. 1--' 11 Nod ialam e1 IMliciti {.Ow.MO 2.M2.M0 ILSM.N01 17.M9.9911 TI5.IM.M01 IIS.121.M11 (M.115.mon IM.IIS.M11 11 v .-+--...1az ::::zac::n :::�::zua .. ..... ^••^z:::: I CARTER MIS) ••'•-• ............... T=1 IS Nunn 1 Grn-evor Flu REST I1.1 11.311.:9 i:.116.OM lJ.6M.:M 1.111•141 u.011.40091 1 M.IMAM 17.I19.110. M.111.M0 .. '-' ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... : ............ .--------- ........... � MY(NE n 11 DOxlx[tax 61+11s 1N.QR : 1M.M1 7M.M0 1A 1: FIN: Eoxxnen M16.011 ; 21.91.040 71.110.00 a.S.d1.0M 1: 11 Imvurld all 1.111.JM 1.±7:,;:± LM6.M0 L.022.0 I.C:I.OM 11.126000 :].:.S.MO :1 N '1 SIT.AT GMmY NNaf L::O LrS.:M 594.i:0 l.141.011 I.MI,M1 1.1M.0M MILAN MTS.OM !9 :0 IAxnu I MM11 mm 1.0. r.n151 is ..::1.Vt 111.1T5 n 0 0.10.4010 0 1.:d,MO :J N !ANr-ry :rant:. St•m !1'44/ -. Ot:e1 :M .. .... 107.1M.. OM ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... :1 Iola RMWE ... T,h9,C% A.N1.:7± 11.511.:M '.95.00 M.1:6,gM QML::] AI.Jn0.9M :± ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... "'S"'STAKE '-•_-... ........... ........... :6 Ills "'STAKE THROW :_?L:R W.EfS.:M S2.tNdM IL1M.0M MUM 111.111.0M 16.512.M0 1I1.'M.00 :1 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... EXPENDITURES .....------- :J SNN al JONI wns OeLLNM lx! ±7.1M.::: :2.10.M 19.90.::1 3.x1.JN ',AOIA I M.1N.W 16.776.00 125.:10.00 :1 :6 Man"GllAc IN Sm. N.M:R ?AI6:M ..M.::) LD5.M1 tl5.0 0 29.IIO.MO 9.2M.CM M.Mm G 21 MP wxxls 1.111.::7 1.111,14 fjN!.::R 1.1:1.M1 I,06S.M 2IX:.OM 19.161.%V N.SSI.MI C :1 01A1r EN61x11.l. e 0 3 1 ........... ........... ........-.. .....--.--. .-...-..... ........... ..----.-... -.--.-....- p N TOM EXPEMNMES +:.MMM 1IAT-V SIAPIL M • 11.N1.0M 00.GLtp IM.Jx.W M 1N.N.1 Grn-Fool to xN Nu "X..:M. . S.A.HOz •+LC!dM. '1A11M11 :N.M: IL1A..M01 IT.54:a5 C!!4.M■ 0 ............ .... ...... �......... . za----M! .. ..z1---. .�-.... ... ..-..--... ...z1z SCHEDULE 5 ORDINANCE NO. 721 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 718 ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 720 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the District; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54192; and, C. That the new connection fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1.: Section No. 702 of Ordinance No. 718 is hereby amended to read: n702. DISTRICT NO. 7 CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit Required. No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. "V-1" AGENDA ITEM k27(d) DISTRICT 7 "V-1" B. District Connection Charge Amounts. The following District connection charges are hereby established commencing December 1, 1988, and shall be paid to the District or to an agency designated by the District: 1. Connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. 2. Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling building, the connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. 3. Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including but not limited to commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings the connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of, floor area contained within sugh construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500. 4. Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs 1 and 3 above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be . allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charge. 5. Connection charges for additions or alteration of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the rea "V-2" AGENDA ITEM #27(d) - DISTRICT 7 "V-2" of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the connection charge `✓ shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units; 6. Trunk connection charge, residential uses: Family dwelling unit: $6.00 per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such charge shall be less than $400 plus the _ applicable regular connection charge for dwelling units hereinabove specified. 7. Connection charge, off-site sewers not a part of Master Plan relative to reimbursement agreements: The charges for connections to off-site sewers which are not included as a part of the District Master Plan and f which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner shall be in the amount provided for in said Agreement. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due whether the original Agreement is still in force, has been extended, or has expired. These connection charges shall be in addition to any other charges hereinabove established for the property connecting to District facilities. 8. Trunk connection charge, commercial or industrial establishments: $10.00 per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such front foot charge shall be less than $500.00, plus the applicable regular connection charge for new construction and existing structures other than dwelling buildings hereinabove specified. 9. Assessment District connection charge: The regular connection charges provided in the preceding subsections.of this Section, plus a sum of `..d money equal to the assessment charge without interest, or Treasurer's charge "V-3" AGENDA ITEM #27(d) - D?STRICT 7 "V-3" which would have been made against the real property on which said improvements are located had said real property been assessed within the Assessment District which constructed or acquired the Assessment District sewer to which connection is made. .Section 2: Ordinance No. 720 is hereby repealed. Section 3: If any provision or Section of this Ordinance is declared to be. unlawful, invalid, or in any manner unenforceable, then each and every other provision herein shall remain in force as though enacted independently. The Secretary of the Board is directed to certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the County. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, held Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California "V-4" AGENDA ITEM #27(d) - DISTRICT 7 "V-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS oI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA • 108"EWS AVENUE oN 80 .et2' FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 In Al962-2nt 8/30/88 STAFF REPORT DTST§Ir­N`F_7 DISTRICT'S CONNECTION =WWWF'OR CAPITAL FINANCING Background In 1986 the Board approved the issuance of Certificates of Participation in the amount of $44,300,000 as a means of providing some of the funds needed for the costs of providing facilities to keep pace with the stringent requirements of federal and state regulatory agencies for advanced treatment and the need to provide additional capacity to meet the increasing demands on the sewerage system. However,•connection fees charged to new development are currently the primary source of new capital funds for the District. During the 1988-89 Budget process, staff advised the Directors that an increase in connection fees would need to be evaluated in the current year to reflect the cost of providing sewerage system capacity. Connection Fee Review Staff has recently completed a review of connection fees throughout the Districts based on an analysis of the historical costs of planning, designing and constructing facilities both in the individual Districts' collection systems and in the ,joint works treatment and disposal facilities. The current cost of providing collection system and ,joint works capacity ranges from $1,485 to $1,688 per unit for a single family/multi-family unit and from $297 to $337 per 1,000 square feet of commercial , industrial , governmental and other types of office facilities. To reflect the current cost of providing sewerage system 'capacity, the several Districts have been systematically increasing their connection fee schedules. The amounts of $1,500/$300 have been determined to be the appropriate fee in part to simplify administration of the fees by the cities who collect them on behalf of .the Districts. Because the cities cross District boundaries, a consistent fee schedule is much easier to administer. Exhibit 1 presents a summary of the current connection fees in the other individual Districts. Districts 1, 5, 6, 11 and 13 have already taken actions to increase their basic connection fees, and District 3 is phasing an increase of its fees to $1,500/$300. Districts 2 and 13 are also considering fee increases at this time. L...✓ Staff has also recently completed an evaluation of the appropriate connection fee levels for the District 7 share of the costs of expanding both the ,joint works treatment facilities and the District's collection system. Staff's analysis indicates that the basic fee for new connections to pay the costs of "W- " AGENDA ITEM 1127(d) (1) - DT.STRICT 7 "W-)" Page Two 8/30/88 the treatment facility expansion and the master-planned collection system should be consistent with the fees in the other Districts, and should reflect the flow ratios prevalent in the other Districts as follows: Dwelling Units Non-Residential Facilities $1,500/00 $300/1,000 Sq. Ft. Cash Flow Comparison Schedule A, Statement of Projected Cash Flow (excerpted from the District 7 1988-89 budget), presents the District's financial position assuming the District's existing connection, fee schedule remains in place for the next ten years. Line 28, Reserves and Carry-over to Next Year, indicates that the District's capital funds will be significantly reduced from $21.0 million at the end of this year to $5.1 million in 1992-93, and further to $2.8 million in 1997-98. o Schedule 8 presents the District's financial position using the proposed basic connection fee of $1,500/$300 effective January 1, 1989. Line 28, Schedule 8, Indicates that the District would maintain a strong positive cash position in Its capital fund assuming the proposed assumptions above, and could potentially have $35,794,000 in reserve for new construction and capital replacement at the end of the ten-year period. It should be noted that the connection fee schedule will continue to escalate to keep pace with the rising cost of providing sewerage system capacity. The projections for both cash flows assume that all construction projects proceed on schedule. Thus, the estimates can be considered "worst case" scenarios. However, we continue to experience delays in major projects such as the Central Power Generating System because of SCAQMD requirements. Further delays in this $53 million project of which District 7's share is $3.4 million, would also delay, or at least spread out, the need to raise capital funds. The same is true for other capital projects. Conversely, as the Directors are aware, if the EPA does not renew the secondary treatment waiver in 1990, the District's capital needs will increase substantially. Work to,date by the consultants on the "Action Plan for Balanced Environmental Management: Preserving Orange County's Coastal Ocean Waters," which includes as a major element an update of the facilities required to meet federal and state treatment requirements and accommodate the projected growth in our service area, indicates that major capital expansion will be required regardless of the treatment alternative ultimately implemented. The Action Plan will also recommend financing methods of which connection fees will only be one component, basically to pay for facilities required to serve new development. Other major financing mechanisms include issuance of debt and a capital facilities charge as a component of annual user fees. "l•!-2" AG.:NDA ITEM #27(d)(1) - N STRICT 7 "� -2" Page Three `..' 8/30/88 Recommendations Staff recommends the Directors increase the connection fee to $1,500 per dwelling unit and $300 per square foot of non-residential buildings, effective as soon as possible to reflect the qurrent cost of providing sewerage system capacity. It is also recommended that the separate zones in District 7 be eliminated and that the above fee schedule be established District-wide. The single. connection fee schedule will also be easier for the cities to administer. Further changes to the long-range capital financing plan should be held in abeyance pending completion of the Action Plan for Balanced Environmental Management. V "W-z" AGENDA ITEM #27(d)(1) - DISTRICT 7 �W_z^ EXHIBIT 1 8/30/88 CSOOC EXISTING CONNECTION FEES Single/Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial/ District/Zone Dwelling Units Governmental/Other 1 $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 $ 220 per dwelling $ 45 per 1,000 sq. ft. 3* $1,000 per dwelling $ 200 per 1,000 sq. ft. 5 $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 6 $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 7: Zone 1 $ 250 per dwelling $ 50 per 1,000 sq. ft. Zone 2 $ 250 per dwelling $ 180 per 1,000 sq. ft. Trunk Connection Charges: Residential - $6/front foot charge plus $250 per dwelling unit; minimum $400 plus $250/dwelling unit. Commercial - $10/front foot charge plus $50/1,000 sq. ft. floor area; minimum $500 per $50/1,000 sq. ft. 11 $1,500 per dwelling 8 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 13: Zone A Variable (fees to be the same as District 2 or 7) Zone B $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. Zone C $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. * Scheduled to increase to $1,500/$300 on July 1, 1989 - "W-4" AGENDA ITEM #27(d)(1) - DISTRICT 7 "W-4" CAVITY SMnATM MIMS w ) uiSC1�EMWLE A. ESTATEMENT or OA0UCTED CAM FLOW rill I N FIUa T AI 1961-I9 TUWAN 1991-98 11 441 LIU 19/1-19 Ties." ITp-91 1991:9} 199129J 5-iw Total am-" wim, Total LIT[ O114116 MO I Harr"I urrr•au fiat List latr 61262.000 7.041.0 o 7.612.006 1.015.00 1.237,011 [ O262.1411 $.IU.M1 6.212.01he 1 ........... .......__ »......._ ........... -----_..» 1 slytilut 2 Satas It It is.010011m 316111.0w 319711w 4,277.00 4,607.000 1.961.4" 21.501.000 11,733.000 52,110.000 2 J 5m: lemtrul NISH 135.000 5M.M0 $75.000 661.00 760.00 2.931.000 5.891.0E 1.823.000 3 D 1 IOwretl I ReattAmm lmasf I10.Om MAN THA00 571.OM $10.00 I 2.700.00 9551000 3,65S,I11) 1 m S OW, Remat ; 0 0 l ..,...-.. ........... ......... _.-.___ ..._-_- I --.------- .__..._. 6 lOffit R51[1111 1,593.000 1.919.Ow 5.O7.M1 5.065.000 6,111.1O 1 MIMOSA 31.010.1" 65.211,00 6 n ....._. ......... _......._ .._..--- ------- : •---------- ---•--_. „...._... ti 1 TRIAL AMILAIL[ CLAIMS 1I.05.m II.TO.Ow 11.111.044, 11.1w,w II.S41.6M A6w.0w II.111.011 71.4110.0M 1 1 ••SReM 01 Maim wrb R A 0 2.10.00 3.162.I4,11 MIA MI /.III.MI LIM.OM ' It.SA.OM 11.2UAw 55.12I.141) 1 N 9 rmlut'"$W.P I 0 im Otwr Has. I.IU.OM 1.216./01 I.wAB 1,412,144 I.419.0O f.7w.0w Ie.U6.M/ 11./71,OOp 9 V 11 Staff [.wmfTMi 0 0 16 CL 11 loin IMMUNE; 3.W'm I,Sn,OM 1,911,M1 O631.1w 6.In.010 1 25.211.w0 ts.in.0O 111445.0O 11 .. ....._._. ........- ...._.._. ._....._. ._......_ ...._..... --------- ........... 17 wwrm I C.111 f1 w last US' 7.001.0O 1.412,M0 I.045.M1 1.237.141) 1.111,IM ; 1.113.OM II,9L•,ro01 13.965.001 U 13 Orr, Iwl Oq hasm f0W00 Aewihweat 1.9n•010 2.119.M1 :.617,M1 :.111.00 J.114.0O : L2G,w0 6,10.w0 AMMAN IJ 1 . ....-.._ ._...... .__.._.. .......»» ........... _......... .......».. . .......... C 11 1."16Gof w SOflirilb 5.0161111 5.111,100 1.5UAM 5.110.040 COMM 6199.O114 II.I0.0401 14.105.1"1 If miR:WI [n[P.x.U: 6r:::::::: ::::x::i[n m:.^.::Rn f[i:::::.�: x:an[[:L i•i•-.•x••i r-. WI14: HIMS1 • - lA Isar., I LY11-0e,It. Lot IW 21.)O.pw 71.w.M0 lAln.M0 6.ALMp S.n2.eat a.11l,wp S.OM.M0 2cim"t IS n ........... .......... _...._. ._........ .......... ; ..._....... ..._.-.... .......... `I FUME -4 I6 EI.&I'M6te SIMS Ili.wr 171.00 In.MO 11 17 !in: C.santio. mm malim w0.M0 S0.10 MO.Ow ; 2.5"J" 7.500.w0 S.w4.0O 17 • a 3.0111 AIDS, n1.0x 201.O4111 2A.040 7)O,MO 31JAM LI91AM 2.olkm EULMO n I9 331f .1 unfit Riots 292.w0 29.14e 11.m 111.00 SS[.0w 1.601.00 9I. M LIU.OM 11 ATlAtinst 11utslnMm lose.. 1.610,1bp I,:ILMO IILOM III,wO ALwS 1 1.337.OM 1.525.000 $.$".atO M II Ilwr 1AM11 0 e 2) ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... � --------- ..-._---- ........... n ilia UNIM 7,126.401 1.961.040 I.M2.w0 2.022.100 I.531.0O i 9,112.0111 6.234.000 16.Ow.0w n -..-.».-.. ...._... .......... ........... ........... 3 23 IOfa A9AMWL1 IMOIS _.__.._ „__._-- -42.413.06 ...nl.wi ':.....w ......0M ......Rep 6.150;000 i A.IT.Op II.w,M0 /......w0 U ......-_.. ........... ........... .....-..... 1 21 -•Surf Of Biel win 11-aswet 0UM 6.I26.0w S.MS.MO I.145.w0 2.462.140 1.770.0w i 19.111.111 1.231,000 28,O1.106 7/ A l:um,Glle:uen auas l.Up.MO 41I40.000 1.020.000 }nAM 120,Ow i 1Ow.M1 2A,OM M.W10w 25 S 26 ::Mr GMMitvMl 1111.041 1 M0M0 971.000 26 ......._. ........... ........... ........... _......... 1 _........ ...__.. ........... N 27 ]Oa MUSLI0U5 1.1}6.w0 9,14.we O.465,00 7.712.M0 1.1901000 i 31JI910O IAM,IM 39.5191O011 A ....-__.. ........... ........... ........... ........... 1 ...._..._ .......... ........... 21 nit,",A Gnr-wi, at Rest fell ELU9.wO I3.L'LOM E.In.OM S.111.M0 s.ow.wl 1 Lw.00 1.171.140 2.126.045 n ::snw:[zz nn::::_:: zz[:::::::z: ::::m[ n: SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE A RRII SnEEAEHR REDUCE R. 1 1416191 SIAEUHII Of RUICELO CW BEEN Pale I 91SCAE ELW 1911.19 Tom IM-91 Ivan; 6� LINE 19R•19 19:a10 1910-91 J991-V 1992.13 S•lu, Lou: 1191-91 10-1.1 total LIN _..._ _._ ....... ------ --.._ _---_. —-----_ --.—.—•— _ am MO131 29 AANer..I l ferp-Ore, Ere.last.Mr 1.290.00 110.0" no.OR 30.0R 0 1.290.00 0 1.290.00 R NEVILLE IN ❑. to, 191.00 197.000 111,R0 w 31 lourest 6 R...Ila Not AA to... la.M 37.000 10.000 1.00 0 III.OR 0 W.000 31 32 atoll tune 0 BE CD A I0141 RLVEnE 1a.0R 11.CR 10.000 IMM 0 319.0w 0 )MAIL 31 r" ---._._. -___.... .......... --------- --------- ? ._.-.._-. ------- ------ Z 3t IDEAL AVAILABLE IMINe 1,364.000 1I5.00 166,R0 226.004 0 , 1.609.400 0 1.6R.000 34 v 'EIFEARLI S _ Intel 33 Iona Nn0au1 A IAurnE 516,R0 569.000 236.OR 228.e0 1.01.000 LEMON 3$ 3 36 all,, l.enauuref 5 ........... .....'..... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... N 37 RIAI E311101IW13 $76,00 561.0R .131.400 RI.M 0 I.609.04101 0 LAMBDA 37 V ---.-._.. ........... ........... ........... ........... ......._-• •-•-__•_ •-......... n 31 An.....1 W,raver IL RAN Bur 111,00 25i.OR 30.000 0 0 ; 0 0 0 IS 39 Ant leer's Oq Len" Ine14 R..uin.lot, 131,000 251.00 30.000 0 0 0 0 0 39 i. • .._....... —........ .......... .......... ----------- 3 ......_.. H -....-....- " w mna Imnae er mdwiu o e e e a 0 e 0 w ............ ........ . ..........e :::::::::: i wnwn (a0juue0 IN, letn•fvAO luulusl O al Reser.es A Cam-Orer Ifee LANE 1e9f 11.119.00) 21.M.000 21.023.00 11.141.000 13,649.00C 13.1199.010 13.173.00 33.219.000 el f/1 41 101AL REVENUE 7,193.000 6.9 MON e.119.000 2.065.000 7.912.000 37.219.010 11.314.000 11.601.000 12 , •••N IOIAL AVAILABLE rUnlNt 41.312,000 1S,112.000 •2:.040 I2.312.000 21.M.000 11.118.00 S7.e11.000 115.50210" al rl N IOlel 110UDIlURES - Il.3n.w0 14.711.0R 13.126BR i.663.an I.311.000 51.015.000 S6.621.00 114.643.00 14 ......--- --........ ........... ........... ..—..-_-- V IS A.....0f A farrl-O.er tO all 19ar 21.123.000 II.003.00D 11.211.001) 13.649.000 13.173.000 ; 13.173.40 /59.00) 159.00 a5 46 Nlot Nu's All Ou,ad fa00N/Aenvnmts 2.715.000 2.115.000 :.517.000 2.27MOB 3.211.000 ; 3.214,000 6.140.000 6.140.00 N' ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ----_----- -..__.-.. ........... al IOND 30LANCE OR 10EIICIII 26.113.0" 18.59.000 11.130.000 101112.000 1,959.00D ; 9,959.00 15.221.001 E5.191.4w1 It (T SCHEDULE A SNIEOUL( MEATY INITIATION DISTRICT No. 1 M16IM , S SIAIERM Of MECTEO NIX FEW page 1 FISCAL NAZIS 1918-69 IWOWN I991-N V M1`Nl • LIME 1911B-19 119- 19N-91 ITEMS S-rur --- I1N•91 1------ION- .... •OPERATING FUND - ....... ••• 1 Return I Carry-bor fret NRt You 6,262'm I'mi'm 1,612.M0 8,045.00 11231,01"S. ; 61262.0 1,111,000 6,I12,041 1 _........ ......... ........... ........... _--------- .--------- .--------- ---------. REVENUE 2 SOera of It he Allmtidn J,NS.m 3.911,440 61217,M0 1.01.000 1,%1.M0 i 21,507,11A0 31.233.00 52.110.000 2 3 Fees: NOustnal Nsu 435.N0 WOOD, SIS'm N1.0M 160.410 2 2,931,00/ S,M2.000 1.023.000 J I Interest S Rissellauus Im.e e10,010 IMPACT S1.N0 S71,00 SM.MO ; 2,1M,M0 NS.N1 11655.000 a 5 USA,1"... 0 0 5 GI I TOTAL Ru(AW 1,13.0N 1119. M 5.07.00 S."Sm film.000 2711111.0111 1.010.01,11 65.219.000 6 m ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 1 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUADIX6 10.155.001 t1.M0,OM 13,019.00 I3,094.m 11,511.000 11NO.M1 46.193.001 71.710.000 7 n ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ---------- EXPENDITURES m 1 INr.of trial marks N 6 0 21749.00 3.162.00 3.636.00 4.111410 s,M9,OM 11,11.M0 TIES M0 55.11.9M 1 g i Co1lutiu Are,.. A 1 0 and Btu, Opu. 1.I0,00 1.216,00 1.331.OM 1.422:00 1.619,000 6,11,010 I0.I11,M0 I1,eN,OM 9 10 Other ExMMltures 1 a 10 it ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... N 11 TOTAL NP[XD1IW[I 1.I51.ON I,311.aM 1.911.m S.61J.:00 6.11.0M 25.211.0N N,11.N0 A,u5,000 It ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... G 12 Ness...I Nr,v-Orar to Nert Year 7.01.040 1,612.000 0.045.000 1,211,M0 8,113.00 i 0.113.000 N,9I5.aN1 11,%S.M01 12 11 Her, Yelr's Are NrSu I."."Wesu..m I,921.0O0 2.199.00 2.111.000 2.1[27.0011 3,211.000 ; J,2I1,01 6•I0.0111) I,il*. M 13 ^ ........... ...A...... ........... ...-....... .......... ........... ........... .......... v 14 RAM Other.or lktSCitl S.414.000 S.123.001 S.51.00 5.430.06 CAM ARA I./M.MO 51.113.0011 11.IM.MN le CAPITAL FW0191 uuuv..rt nmsunx uxluuz.. :Mr:1rr.r .......... vurnuu vuvmz. ........... ............... IS Rmrn,L N..Y..., fre.test Yu, N.111.m 21•115.0N 11.1191000 13.041.000 13.311.00 24.341,000 11.l1.JM 26.:.i:1M IS [A ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ........... ........... m RE9NDE n 11 Cuslruiun Coots EMMA 111.0M 2V,80 16 fm: CMorcu. 1.11.pW S. M.MO !. MBM !.:00.M I.000.001 N.:M.DM 15.0O.M 2.'!U,000 II V 7 lmultn,l xane 177.0n M1.00 :3S.CM M.00 J11.000 : 1.1r1.DM Lue.Nt !.::-.C50 13 :1 Sell 01 (luaru treat, 2.:I0 21A00 H.:M !.I.:U 356.M0 L.JI,:M o1.::0 r„,,np ,t :i imrest I mrell.emu! :110es ..'Y.w] eJ•t.:.7 LGe,2:: E.aa],43: Llfe.i:i 6,a7,aM 1.105.:04 P.i .:W 2A :i Ore., !.. 0 ) 21 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... TOTAL R(YERn( 11:L:00 4.632.aoo ..!7!.::p !.:N.:% ..l6MCC a.:::.l20 :5.ilMia q,;!:,;N ".. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ' . :3 I014 AVAILABLE IM0146 !0d69.00 26.%).0M 21.N6.::0 :!.:SA.::1 N.:.O,MO 41.w1,:0 u.:M.MI CSd13..`M .. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... . ........... ........... ........... EXPENDITURES ............ :. ' ;he,.el later Dar., Inlrvest tire, v.L'6.dOp S.M1.3M a.uS.tN 2.4.2.:CD LIla.MO 19.111.0011 1.237.30 4.:01) :. :5 Drum, tollrctiu Snu. 1.tu.m 1,040.0M 6.020.00 320.11N 126.011) 10.41.00 233.W0 IO.evJ.W :5 :6 Otter Emmert.... 911.001 SII.aM 311.011 :6 Z ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... $ .. IDIN (A0ENDIIMES 9.174.000 91I111.0" 11465.000 2.12.tM I.1M,001 31.119.001) 6414.00 N.!P.:g1 :1 V :1 Acorn. I Carrr-mr to Dart oar :2.S35.N0 17.119.000 13.041.1.0 I5.07,00 19.350.00 II.4501010 35.7u.m ".:M !I mute..... ............ ...n.ur... .,.r.vuw .uvunzn .....u.m uumuv :SCHEDULE 5 SCHEDULE B LOAN SOIIATIO DISTRICT a. 1 0161O STATUNT O mi im EAa ILO Vq.2 FISCAL YEAS 1911-19 Tm a 1991-98 1991.99/ LINE 190.89 109-0 1990.91 Neva 1991-93 5-u.e foul 1Oi-91 10.11.11.1.1 LIS —IaD MOESS i9 AOenn 141110,11 Lea Lett War I,IO.OE 188.00 I16.O0 30.000 0 ! 1.290.00 0 1.390.00 19 n Ono m N To.LO9 191,00 197.00 191.m 30 z 31 located 1 Ailalu.m0. iemr. N,O0 31.000 10.000 I,000 0 113.m 0 III.000 31 n 31 altar lam. 0 11 A Tom WINE 74.000 D,OO ID,0O 191,0E 1 119.00 0 319.000 33 ---....... ........... ........... .........- .......... ---------- -----.----- .......... m N 70TAL AVAILABLE IODINE I.M.000 Map NI ON 511.00 0 1,09,00 0 1.109.001 3t EEPO011UAEs IQ 15 - lent/riO00.1 L lets... $16.000 S69.00a 531.000 111.000 1,609.00 1.01,00 SS n 16 O1O1 E4rMilouo 16 - - .......... .... ........... ......-_ ; ......... - -- 31 talk EXPEDITIOUS ES 516. 569,000 236.000 ELDO0 0 1.60,00 0 1.60.000 11 v ........... ........... ---------- -----.---- --------- ----------- ........... ........... 0 Arurm t hrtpOrn to drt 9nr la.tro JS1000 50.000 0 0 0 0 a 0 19 Xnt I.W.DIV Period Iatle,A1O19OenO 110.000 154.000 10.00 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 - ........... ........... ....----- --------- •-----_-• -----_-_- --------- --------- 10 Focal Warc. or IDtlicill 0 0 0 0 0 ; 0 0 0 40 A SDMAll 1O3e10 for Inter-O00111mu'll (1 11 Aetenet 1 prtr-Over Iron Lett 11.1 11.199.000 30.111.000 11.937.060 11.111.00 I1.611.0O ; ILEW WO 76.461.O0 IM99.0O at q TOTAL 1EVIACE 1.39.00 9,656300 9.801.000 11.111.00 11.161.00 50.519.00 63.991.000 111 573.0O et V ........... ........... ........... ........—. ........... . -•-----. ........... ...-....... q IOTAL AVAILABLE TODIAE - q.56/.000 39.161.00 31111 :0 J1.111.O0 14.181.000 ; 6I.111.00 0.151.0O III.02.O0 as u TOTAL 1391NDIOOS 13.50.000 11.195.M I3.175.O0 9.161.00 3.111.0E ; $9.015.0O 56.631.00 111.03.0O 14 ........... ........... ........... .......... .....----- ------ ---------- ----------- 15 Aaene3 A Lerr9.Our to.eel I... N.g1.O0 11,01.00 11.116.00 13,II10O 16.163.M ; 76.461.00 55.619.00 33329.000 .5 N. NUl 'it, 1 .'knO he"m Near n.mlt :311.00 1.6.5.OE0 5.511.000 2.121.00 3.111.00 3.214,000 6.149.00 6.110.00 16 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- - ----------- ----------- ----------- 11 MO BALANCE O IOEFICiT1 11.109.00 n.51I.0O 18.99.00 10.ID1.0O 23.119.00 11.E19,0O 11.60.00 11.09.0O 41 I ! � e ■`` - SCHEDULE 0 - ORDINANCE NO. 1304 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1301 ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1302 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the District; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992; and, C. That the new connection fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Section 702 of Ordinance 1301 relating to connection charges is, hereby amended to read as follows: 11702. DISTRICT NO. 13 CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit Required. No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued "X_i „ AGENDA IT M H27(A) - D'STRICT 17, which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charge Amounts. The following District connection charges are hereby established commencing December 1, 1988, and shall be paid to the District or to an agency designated by the District: (1) . Connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be S1,500. per dwelling unit. (2) Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling building, the connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (3) Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500. (4) Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (1) and (3) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. (5) Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing 14.) "X-2" AGENDA ITEM ,42.7(a) - DISTRICT 117 "X-2" buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall. be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units.° Section 2. Section 701.0 of Ordinance No. 1301 is hereby repealed. Section 3. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County; California, at a regular meeting held Chairman of the oard o rectors County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California •.v_z•• ••v_z AGENDA ITEM. - DISTRICT 13 •• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 71 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 108 EW9 AVENUE PO BOX8127 elf/ FOUNTNN MIRY,MLIFORNIA 9272E-8127 MM962.2A11 9/6/88 STAFF REPORT DIS RUC NO. 13 DISTRICT'S CONNECTION PROGRAM FOR CAPITAL FINANCING Background Connection fees are established by the District to pay for facilities to keep pace with the stringent requirements of federal and state regulatory agencies for advanced treatment and the need to provide additional sewerage system capacity that new development places on the sewerage system. During the formation of District No. 13 three zones were defined for establishing connection fees. The territory included in Zone A was originally within the boundaries of Districts Nos. 2 and 7 but was transferred to new District No. 13 as part of the AB 8 tax exchange settlement agreement between the Districts and the County of Orange. Thus, the fees in Zone A were established at the same level as would be charged in District No. 2 or District No. 7, respectively. The fees in Zones B and C were set at a higher rate based upon the anticipated sewerage system needs of the new service areas to be included in District No. 13. Discussion Staff has recently completed a review of connection fees throughout the Districts based on an analysis of the historical costs of planning, designing and constructing facilities both in the individual Districts' collection systems and in the joint works treatment and disposal facilities. The current cost of providing collection system and joint works capacity ranges from $1,485 to $1,688 per unit for a single family/multi-family unit and from $297 to $337 per 1,000 square feet of commercial , industrial, governmental and other types of office facilities. During the 1988-89 Budget and supplemental user fee adoption proceedings, the Directors increased the connection fees in Zones B and C to $1,500, consistent with the fees in several other Districts, but did not change the fee in Zone A. At that time staff advised the Directors that Districts Nos. 2 and 7 would be considering fee adjustments during the first quarter of the 1988-89 fiscal year and that it would be appropriate to adjust the Zone A fee at that time so that all developing properties in the respective Districts would pay the same connection fee, basically reflecting the current cost of providing sewerage system capacity. The several Districts have been systematically increasing their connection fee �../ schedules. The amounts of $1,500/$300 have been determined to be the appropriate fee, in part to simplify administration of the fees by the cities "Y-i" AGENDA ITEM #27(e)(1) - DISTRICT 13 11Y-111 Page Two 9/6/88 who collect them on behalf of the Districts. Because the cities cross District boundaries, a consistent fee schedule is much easier to administer. Exhibit 1 presents a summary of the current connection fees in the other individual Districts. Districts 1, 5, 6 and 11 have already taken actions to increase their basic connection fees, and District 3 is phasing an increase of its fees to E1,500/$300. Districts 2 and 7 are also considering fee increases at this time.- Recommendation Staff recommends the Directors increase the connection fee for property currently in Zone A to S1,500 per dwelling unit and $300 per square foot of non-residential buildings, concurrent and consistent with the proposed fee changes in Districts Nos. 2 and 7. This fee restructuring will eliminate the need for separate zones in District No. 13 and establish a single connection fee schedule throughout the District. The District-wide fee schedule will also be easier for the cities to administer. "Y-2- AGENDA ITEM .#27(e)(1) - DISTRICT 13 "Y-2" EXHIBIT 1 8/30/88 CSDOC EXISTING CONNECTION FEES Single/Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial/ District/Zone Dwelling Units Governmental/Other 1 $1,500 per dwelling S 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 $ 220 per dwelling $ 45 per 1,000 sq. ft. 3* $1,000 per dwelling $ 200 per 1,000 sq. ft. 5 $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 6 $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 7: Zone 1 $ 250 per dwelling, $ 50 per 1,000 sq. ft. Zone 2 $ 250 per dwelling $ 180 per 1,000 sq. ft. Trunk Connection Charges: Residential - $6/front foot charge plus $250 per dwelling unit; minimum $400 plus S250/dwelling unit. Commercial - $10/front foot charge plus $50/1,000 sq. ft. floor area; minimum $500 per $50/1,000 sq. ft. 11 $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. 13: Zone A Variable (fees to be the same as District 2 or 7) Zone B $1,500 per dwelling $ 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. Zone C $1,500 per dwelling S 300 per 1,000 sq. ft. * Scheduled to increase to S1,500/S3OO on July 1, 1989 "Y-3" AGENDA ITEM #27(e) (1 ) - DISTRICT 13 "Y-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 11 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 112 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON AUGUST 10, 1988 PpITA770N yy 9 ,o9olimy � DIs Jr,9° a C G S/nes I954 y T RgNGE LOON AI)K NISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on August 10, 1988, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Fall wing the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a puorun present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, It. 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: z Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank a Dan Griset, Chairman pro tam —Dan Young -7--Ronald B. Hoesterey Richard B. Edgar a Roger Stanton —_Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: z A.B. -Buck- Catlin, Chai man _Chris Norby a William 0. Mahoney, Chairman pro tem _James H. Flora -7—Ben Bay Iry Pickier 7--Roland E. Bigonger —Todd Murphy -7--Dan Griset Dan Young 7--Gene A. Layton —Carrey Nelson a James Neal —_George Scott -7—Arthur G. Newton John 0. Tynes 7--Bob Perry _Norman Culver a Mayne Silzel James T. Fasbender a Don E. Smith —Jess Perez =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman _Larry Herman a Sal 5apien, Chai man pro ten _Martha Weishaupt =Margaret M. Arnold _William Davis xBen Bay _Iry Pickier x A.B. -Buck- Catlin Chris Norby 7--Norman Culver —_Bob Perry -7--John Erskine _Grace Winchell a Don R. Griffin Rhonda J. McCune -7--Dan Griset _Dan Young z William D. Mahoney _James H. Flora z James Neal _George Scott =Carrey Nelson _John H. Sutton =J.R. -Bob- Siefen Dewey Wiles =Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth a Charles Sylvia —Robert Wahlstrom a Edna Wilson —_Joe Hunt DISTRICT NO. 5: z Evelyn Hart, Chai man _John C. Cox, Jr. =John C. Coz, Jr., Chairman pro tem Ruthelyn Plummer =Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman Eric Johnson =Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tem _Ruthelyn Plummer. a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Richard Edgar, Chai man _Ursula Kennedy •Sally Anne Miller, Chairman pro tan Larry Agran -7--John C. Cox, Jr. —Ruthelyn Plummer =Dan Griset —Dan Young x Don R. Rath —Roger Stanton _ =Don E. Smith Jess Perez =James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tan Mays, Chairman Peter Green a John Erskine, Chairman pro tem Grace Winchell x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Todd Murphy, Chairman Roland E. Bigonger =Ben Bay, Chai man pro tem —Iry Pickier x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton a Don E. Smith Jess Perez =John Sutton _Carrey Nelson �J DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chai man _Darryl Miller =Ursula Kennedy, Chai man pro ten Richard B. Edgar a Sally Anne Miller —Larry Agran x Don R. Roth, Chairman pro tem _Roger Stanton =Don E. Smith Jess Perez -2- 08/10/88 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary Streed, Penny Kyle, Corrine �✓ Clawson, Mike Deblieux, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Don Crapnell , Bob Ooten, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Jamel Demir, Harvey Hunt, Phil Stone, Mad Kodmur, Joe Bertoli , Ken Hekimian, Chuck Paskerian, Jim Hargreaves, Robert White s t � � x x • • x e x : : ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman presented plaques _ Reco nitiono Directors recently recognizing Directors who had recently comp?Ieting Chairmanship terms completed terms of office as Chairmen, as follows: John H. Sutton Vice Joint Chairman - July 1987 to July 1988 Ronald B. Hoesterey District 1 Chairman - May 1986 to July 1988 Sally Anne Miller District 14 Chairman - January 1986 to May 1988 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that the Report of the Joint Chairman Select Committee to Advise the Staff was scheduled to meet on Wedesday, August 24th, at 5:30 p.m. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments ., Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT' 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -3- 08/10/88 DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1988, the Chairman ordered `.✓ that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of nu es to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification o a men o o n and individual DistrictClaims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 7/06/88 7/20/88 ALL DISTRICTS Joint operating Fund - $ 666,934.18 $ 463,967.26 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 5,262,970.52 532,895.04 Joint Working Capital Fund - 161,569.57 132,405.68 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 6,733.25 9,617.43 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1 977,440.65 TRICT NO. 2 103,685.25 . 1,787,655.12 Uffffe Abe - 109,485.31 1,927,316.29 UrTMrr_ffU._9 - 2,033.07 42,233.36 D MM-079 - 4,377.50 27.31 of n7TU-07 7 - 19,805.81 21,899.79 DISTRICT N 1 - 344.17 64,669.17 DISTI dJ . - -0- 899.56 DDrMTTCR_FU13 - -0- 137.14 RI$- I T 1 F-5 8 6 JOINT - 20,875.30 1,120,482.26 DI - 32.51 -0- 14 J NT - 2 676.17 160.00 e -4- 08/10/88 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Anionic Polyelectroiyte Chem cal Pol mer That the bid tabulation and pecification NO. ?-III recommendation re award of contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. P-111, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Diatec Polymers, at a unit cost of $.0565 per wet pound, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1988, with option for a one-year extension (estimated annual cost $168,767:00 plus sales tax). ALL DITRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awardin urc ase of Caustic o a olu on, pe0 carion NO. 1`11Z That the bid tabulation and recommendation re award of contract for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-112, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation, for the delivered price of $289.03 per dry tan plus freight and sales tax, with provision for price escalation based on certified documentation not to exceed 13% per calendar quarter, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1988. (Estimated costs to be shared as follows:) 'Treatment Trunk Plants Sewers Total Joint Districts $376,881.31 $297,409.50 $674,290.81 District 3 Only - 297,409.49 297,409.49 $376,881.31 $594,818.99 $971,700.30 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin ham a O roar No. 7 to the pl'aFsin! s ecifitions re That Change Order No. 7 to the plans and Job No. J-1 specifications for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, authorizing a net addition of $19,011.32 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. due to deletion of chlorine solution piping previously installed for emergency use and seven items of modification and additional work, and granting a time extension of eight calendar days for completion of said work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin an e r er N0. 4 0 e ans and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and Job No. PI-ZJK specifications for Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-23R, authorizing a net addition of $212,429.13 to the contract with S. A. Healy Company for replacement of seven additional manholes on Westminster Avenue between Edwards Street and Springdale Street to be paid by District No. 3, and for miscellaneous modifications, to be paid by the Joint Districts, including equipment upgrades, relocation of vent line due to interference with existing effluent line and deletion of asphaltic concrete paving, and granting a time extension of 174 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -5- 08/10/88 ALL DISTRICTS Moved,, seconded and duly carried: rov n Change Order o. to the ans an spedrications re That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and don mos. ancl PI- 1 specifications for Headworks Nos. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20; and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing a net addition of $92,498.00 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. due to deletion of diesel fuel tank monitoring system, removal and disposal of an undisclosed concrete-encased asbestos duct bank and for other miscellaneous modifications and additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving- Change Order No. 5 to the lens and s eci fications re That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and Job Nos. 1-25 P1-26 P - specifications for Covers for Primary vz-jj and P -34 Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. PS-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34, authorizing a net addition of $51,179.04 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. , providing for deletion of underdrain system near the new Billings Tunnel , replacement of deteriorated 36-inch influent line and other miscellaneous modifications and additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A r2vin d en um No. o e tans and s eci fications re That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and ec fication Nos. - -1 and specifications for Underground Tank R-UZ7-Z Replacement at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-027-1, and Underground Tank Replacement at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-027-2, providing for alternate tank design and changes in backfill requirements, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awardinq Specification Nos. -1 K-UZ/-Z to He man & Assoc a es That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 88-107, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Underground Tank Replacement, Specification No. R-027-1, and Undeground Tank Replacement, Specification No. R-027-2, to Hekimian 8 Associates, Inc. in the total amount of $877,459.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the lans.and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and ecificat on Nos. R-UZI-1 and specifications for Underground Tank R-OZ7-Z Replacement, Specification No. R-027-1, and Underground Tank Replacement, Specification No. R-027-2, authorizing a negotiated deduction of $95,459.00 from the contract with Hekimian 8 Associates, Inc. , reducing the charges bid for dewatering of tank sites, be, and is hereby, approved. ... -6- 08/10/88 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: ADDrov ng Professional ervices A reement with Lee and Ro That the Selection Committee Consulting Engineers re design and certification of the final negotiated 1as� construction services for fee relative to the Professional Specification No. R-033-1 and Services Agreement with Lee and Ro pecifica an NO. Consulting Engineers for design and construction services required for Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-033-1, and Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-033-2, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 88-108, approving said Professional Services Agreement for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $40,424.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services A reement That the Selection Committee With The Pro.iect o15 ions ompany certification of the final negotiated for specialized engineering ad fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the construction inspection services Professional Services Agreement with The Project Solutions Company for spe- cialized engineering and construction inspection services re instrumentation/process control systems included in various master-planned construction projects, providing for an extension of the term of said agreement and revision of hourly-rate fee schedule, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 88-109, approving Addendum No. 1 to said Professional Services Agreement, providing for a three-year extension of said contract, on an as-needed basis, from September 10, 1988 to August 31, 19919 and increasing the hourly rates, as follows, plus direct expenses at cost for out-of-town travel: Contract Period Hourly Rate 9/10/88 - 8/31/89 $50.00 9/01/89 - 8/31/90 53.00 9101/90 - 8/31/91 56.00 A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving rofessiona Services Agreement with Martin KoroiCK, Sr. That the Selection Committee for specialized c02 struc ion certification of the final negotiated inspection services . fee relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Martin Kordick, Sr. for specialized construction inspection services re various master-planned construction. projects, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, 08/10/88 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 88-110, approving said Professional Services Agreement for said services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning August 10, 1988, at the hourly rate of $35.00 for the first year and $37.50 for the second year, plus mileage reimbursement for on-the-job travel . A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and den claim submitted by Ted L. ldham That the claim submitted by Ted L. Oldham dated July 12, 1988, in the amount of $442.87 for damage to his auto windshield allegedly caused by a District vehicle, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and eny claim of Ricardo Zermeno That the claim submitted by the attorney for Ricardo Zermeno dated July 13, 1988, in an undetermined amount for alleged damages and personal injuries resulting from an accident involving a District vehicle, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Mr. Joe pproying Change Order No. 2 to the Bertoli , Western Regional Manager for Tans and specifications re Allis-Chalmers, subcontractor to General Job No. J-15A Electric Company, for the manufacture of pumps required for Districts' Job No. J-15A, Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2. Mr. Bertoli stated that he was appealing the Districts' staff's recommendation to deduct $74,000 in liquidated damages under proposed Change Order No. 2 to the job, in the amount of $2,000 per day for 37 calendar days for late delivery of the five 110,000 GPM pumps. Provisions for deducting liquidated damages for such late delivery are specified in the contract. Mr. Bertoli reviewed the circumstances resulting in the 37-day late delivery of the pumps, which included alleged labor unrest problems in Korea where the pumps were manufactured, and the fact that Allis-Chalmers had filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in bankruptcy court. He acknowledged that delivery was, in fact, late, and that the Districts had the contractual right to assess the liquidated damages, but stated that considering Allis-Chalmers' options under Chapter 11, he believed that they had fulfilled their contractual obligations in good faith, and supplied the pumps, albeit 37 days late. He stated that he did not believe that the late delivery had caused the Districts any economic hardship and requested that the Boards of Directors waive the liquidated damages assessed General Electric Company in the amount of $74,000.00. Mr. Mel Kodmur, a principal of Herman-Phinney-Kodmur, Allis-Chalmers �...' manufacturer's representative since 1971 in Southern California, also addressed the Board. He commented that he wanted the Directors to know that his firm would continue to stand behind their commitments regardless of the Boards' decision that evening. -8- 08/10/88 The General Counsel then pointed out that the Districts' contract is with General Electric Company (GE) , not Allis-Chalmers. GE has accepted and approved proposed Change Order No. 2 which includes the $74,000 deduction for liquidated damages and, accordingly, the dispute is really between GE and Allis-Chalmers. He further pointed out that although Allis-Chalmers contends that there was labor unrest in Korea, they have never submitted any evidence to substantiate their claim. The contract includes standard language that allows relief in the event of a strike but not labor "unrestn. Mr. Tom Dawes, Disricts' Director of Engineering, noted that the Districts had awarded the contract with the understanding that the pumps would be manufactured in the United States to assure maximum reliability because of domestic availability of parts and service for this very important equipment that will pump the treated effluent to the ocean for the next 40 years. He also noted that without approval from the Districts, Allis-Chalmers had subcontracted the manufacture of the pumps to a South Korean manufacturer. The Districts were not notified until several months after the fact. Mr. Dawes also commented on the additional costs incurred by the Districts as a result of Allis-Chalmers' action. He advised that the new Ocean Outfall Booster Station is a multi-contract project and indicated that negotiations have not been completed with the pump station's prime contractor that will be installing the pumps and, therefore, it is not yet known if the late delivery will also result in additional construction. costs. The Chair also recognized Mr. Bob White of GE, who stated that GE did not represent or support Allis-Chalmers' request for waiver of the $74,000 liquidated damages already agreed to between the Districts' staff and GE. In response to an inquiry regarding possible referral of the matter to staff for further evaluation of the economic impacts of the delayed pump delivery, the Districts' General Counsel noted that all of the information presented that evening had been previously reviewed with GE and there appeared to be no new information requiring additional study. The Directors entered into a lengthy discussion relative to the question of economic loss to the Districts as a result of the late delivery of the pumps by Allis-Chalmers. It was reiterated by some Board members that the Districts' contract was with General Electric Company, not Allis-Chalmers, and, further, if provisions of the contract were waived, it would set an undesirable precedent causing future contractors to request waivers for any number of reasons if they did not comply with the contract terms and specifications. Several Directors also expressed the view that as a public agency, the Districts have the responsibility to administer the contract in accordance with its terms and conditions and require specified performance by the contractor. It was then moved and seconded: - That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A, authorizing a net deduction of - $92,221.82 from the contract with General Electric Company (including assessment of liquidated damages in the amount of $74,000 due to late delivery of 110,000 GPM pumps of 37 days at $2,000/day) plus expenses incurred by Districts' consultants to inspect the equipment at the supplier's foreign manufacturing site, and for additional items of miscellaneous work, be approved. A substitute motion was then offered and seconded: -9- 08/10/88 That upon determination by the staff and General Counsel that there has been no economic loss or detriment to the Districts as a result of the late delivery of the pumps by Allis-Chalmers, the Boards of Directors waive the liquidated damages in the amount of $74,000.00 assessed against Job No. J-15A, Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2. Following further discussion, during which some Directors again reiterated that the Districts have no contract with Allis-Chalmers but, rather, with GE who, in fact, did not support the request of Allis-Chalmers to waive the late delivery liquidated damages. It was thus argued that the substitute motion would, in effect, interject the Districts in a dispute between GE and Allis-Chalmers. The question was called for and a roll call vote taken on the substitute motion. The Chai man announced that the substitute motion had failed, all nine Districts voting against it. The Directors then voted on the original motion that Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A, authorizing a net deduction of $92,221.82 from the contract with General Electric Company (including assessment of liquidated damages in the amount of $74,000 due to late delivery of 110,000 GPM pumps of 37 days at $2,000/day) plus expenses incurred by Districts' consultants to inspect the equipment at the supplier's foreign manufacturing site, and for additional items of miscellaneous work, be approved. Said motion was duly carried by voice vote. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establish in 1 8-89 char es for Fass lass II and Class III That the respective Boards of Directors n us r a Waste permittees adopt the following resolutions establishing 1988-89 charges for Class I, Class II and Class III permittees, pursuant to provisions of the uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities of said Districts: 1988-89 INDUSTRIAL USER RATES Class I 8 II Fee Class III Fee Dist. No. Resolution No. ow ow 1 88-111-1 $117.17 $117.27 $95.02 $559.78 2 88-112-2 115.30 117.27 95.02 557.91 3 88-113-3 140.61 117.27 95.02 583.22 5 88-114-5 125.77 117.27 95.02 568.38 6 .88-115-6 123.23 117.27 95.02 565.84 7 86-116-7 134.72 117.27 95.02 577.33 11 88-117-11 154.91 117.27 95.02 597.52 13 88-118-13 169.67 117.27 95.02 612.28 14 88-119-14 157.71 117.27 95.02 600.32 *Flow - Per million gallons of flow *S.S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids *B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -30- 08/10/88 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file an a rove written report o a xecutive omn tee That the written report of the Executive Committee' s meeting on July 27, 1988, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: u coriz n staff tto negotiate a u a emn with tiscner & That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Porter Tor new MAU-A flow meters to negotiate a purchase agreement with Fischer & Porter for new MAG-X flow meters to replace 11 existing depreciated or malfunctioning meters. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: uthorizi ng staff to negotiate a than a order to the contract with That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Klewlt Pacific Co. re Job No. Pl-20 to negotiate a change order to the to upgrade the Airbase Trunk flow contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for meter Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, to upgrade the Airbase Trunk flow meter provided for in the contract to a Fischer & Porter MAG-X meter. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: uthorizing staff to negotiate a contract with Fischer & Porter for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized e ri odic flow meter calibration and to negotiate a contract with Fischer & tes ng sery ces Porter for periodic flow meter calibration and testing services. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin the election omnittee o ne o a e Pro ess ono ery ces That the Selection Committee be, and is reement for re arat on of lams hereby, authorized to negotiate a and spec flcations re fabr cation Professional Services Agreement for and installation of new Fischer & preparation of plans and specifications Porter MAG-X meters to provide for the fabrication and installation of new metering transitions and spools and installation of the new Fischer & Porter MAG-X meters. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin the Selec on omni tee to ne otiate Professiona Services That the Selection Committee be, and is g reemen or modifications to hereby, authorized to negotiate a Job No. J-15 to provide a permanent Professional Services Agreement for flow meter test facility preparation of plans and specifications for modifications to the contract for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C• at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, to provide a permanent test facility at the Booster Station to allow for ongoing testing and verification of flow meters. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: u orzn sa oneotatea Chan a order to the contrac withThat staff be, and is hereby, authorized AdvancoConstructors, Inc. re o to negotiate a change order to the No. J-15 for modifications to contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. provide a permanent flow meter test for Ocean outfall Booster Station "C" at facility Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, for any necessary modifications to provide a permanent test facility at the Booster Station to allow for ongoing testing and verification of flow meters. -11- 08/10/88 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing s r e s policies �...� related to pass-tnrougn of tax That the Boards of Directors hereby increment in Keaeveiopment Agency adopt Resolution No. 88-120,. projects establishing'Districts' policies related to pass-through of tax increment in Redevelopment Agency projects, modifying the Boards' existing policy to include provision for obtaining the Districts' historical 3% share of the annual 2% increase in assessed valuation pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670(a). A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re contract with science A lications International o rpp ra on SAIC for NPDES Ocean monitoring b2ry ces Specification No. -032 A ravin Chan a Order Mo. 1 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: urchase rder o. XMO issued to I Env ronmenta Services to audit That Change Order No. 1 to Purchase AI s laboratory procedures Order No. 35016 issued to PTI Environmental Services to conduct an audit of SAIC laboratory procedures and prepare a report, increasing the maximum fee for said services from $25,000.00 to $30,000.00, be, and is hereby, approved. A ravin Amendment No. 5 to the Moved, secdnded and duly carried: Agreement with AI re Specification No. 5-032 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 88-121, approving Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' .120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032, providing for program modifications for the period July 1, 1987 to June 30, 1988 increasing the total authorized maximum amount, including services approved by Amendment No. 4, from $1,664,656.00 to $1,754,067.00 and. providing for negotiated reductions in fees for services for years one, two and three of said contract pursuant to an audit of SAIC's laboratory procedures; and approving further program modifications and extending the contract from July'1, 1988 to June 30, 1989, for an amount not to exceed $1,942,265.00 for services for the fourth year of said contract. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Compen- sation Resolution No. 79-2 , as That the Boards of Directors hereby amended, and Terms and Conditions adopt Resolution No. 88-124, amending of Employment Resolution No. 79-21 Classification and Compensation as amended re changes n sa ar es Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, and and benefits for 5upervisory Terms and Conditions of Employment Employee Unit Resolution No. 79-21, as amended, incorporating changes in salaries, benefits and terms and conditions of employment for Districts' Supervisory and Management employees and authorizing the General Manager to implement said changes. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -12- 08/10/88 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m., August 10, 1988. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. , August 10, 1988. DISTRICTS 5 8 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving-Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Contract No. 5- specifications for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29, authorizing an addition of $80,016.96 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corporation, for removal of undisclosed concrete encasement, installation of an additional 36-inch valve, additional work due to different undisclosed utilities, and other miscellaneous modifications and additional work, and granting a time extension of four calendar days for completion of said work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. , August 10, 1988. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. , August 10, 1988. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving the ordering of Orange County Reorganization No. Ill - That the Board of Directors of County Reorganization of Uounty banitation Sanitation District No. 14 hereby adopts Districts Nos. 7 and 14 Resolution No. 88-122-14, approving the ordering of Orange County Reorganization No. ill - Reorganization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 7 and 14, which transfers territory from District No. 14 to District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: rdering Orange County Reorganiza- tion No. Ill - Rear anization of That the Board of Directors of County Lounty Sanitation Districts Sanitation District No. 7 hereby adopts Nos. 7 and 14 Resolution No. 88-123-7, ordering Orange county Reorganization No. Ill - Reorganization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 7 and 14, which transfers territory from District No. 14 to District No. 7. A certified copy of this , resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -13- 08/13/88 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: . . Adjournment. That this meeting of the Board of �. Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. , August 10, 1988. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Fe-ce-f-ve-and file Summons an Complaint In m nent Domain; That the Summons and Complaint In Superior ourt Case No. 498713, Eminent Domain, Superior Court Case Redevelopment Agency of the City of No. 498713, Redevelopment Agency of the Huntington Beach vs. Huntington City of Huntington Beach vs. Huntington Beach company, et al . Beach Company, et al. , be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, • FURTHER MOVED: That said Summons and Complaint be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: d ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman than declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. , August 10, 1988. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. , August 10, 1988. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m. , August 10; 1988. DISTRICT 2 The Board convened in closed session at Convene in close session ursuant 8:18 p.m. pursuant to Government Code to overnment ode Section 54956.9(a). Section 54956.9(a) DISTRICT 2 At 8:25 p.m. the Board reconvened in Reconvene In regular session regular session. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:25 p.m. , August 10, 1988. Secretary, boaroT ot Uirectors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -14- FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/29/PP FAGE I I REPORT NUMBER AF43 ..... __...___.__ coNNiY.SAD1T eTinN R1SIg1.CISltE_08P➢DLSDLLNJ_v 1�1 CLAIMS PAID 07/16/8A ---_ --_- - �'I I WARPANT..ND._._.___.._..__...VENDOR ___-...._. ,__.. ..__...........__.......AND.UN T. . ... _. ...DESCRIPTION.. 19352P ARC LUMBER COAF. $11.34 IlNEflER "I a93529 .... ._.-._l.E....160LLS1.RI AL..EkGI➢CE91Nf:.__...... ._ .._. __. _...___ 1_9071.NP .__ _. .._ _... . ....PMPPARP .._ I 1535311 A.M. BEST COMPANY f75.09 PIBLilmmLN t 93631 ACCESSORIF AIR COMPRESSOR SYS. $1,356.95 REExmIC ETIUIEO3NP 395532 ... ACI ION...IN5TRUMENISf 1➢C.._._. .}2.d75.59 ... . ._.._.__. INSTRUMENT SUPPIJPS _ 0sf 33 ADVANCO CONSTBUCTOk S. INC. 330RIr993.15 mN319I1 Cli J-15 1^93"A AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. t63.64 ELFICPRIC PARTS 195535 _.._._..ALLIEDSOEE ORATION___.._..__-_..___.__i1S.946...0fl__.__.-____.___-CATIMIC 1M➢XA➢R M.C. 3-11-87 n935SP ALLIED SUPFLT CO. $1,151.84 VALVE 693!37 HERM4N-PHINNEY-KODNUR 31.390.7E MECHANICAL PARTS [93^3P ..__..ALLEUBL..CHEHLCAL_...__-__...__. t61LL95.59_.._.-----. _.__._.__ CHIORIIS M.D..10-14-87 C53539 THE ANCHOR SOUND A VIDEO $54.44 VIDEO 93M1n TNC ANCHOP TACKING CO. f3.500.90 ID1WWGiE 093'_42 ____A➢PE9.SP. ANDERSO ER 458.IlW____._-_...._RAVING ..._ ...SE 8 d93542 RLAKE P. ANOER SON ,150.56 T�9'INS & ADS M.O. 6-10-87 • 090593 A-PLUS STSttMS f5.170.5E I401'ICE 6 ADS ^93945 ASSOCIATED 73.00.__-_. o91F46 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD., INC $415.90 CAB SHI VICES MNPRWB .9351E ASSOCIATED LAPOPAi0R IC5 5415.OY CAB SERVICE >nt •1'T7`4e ..._.....-.AUTO3525.56 P9354P AUTO SHOP F.OUIFNENT CO. $275.46 REFUND PARTS b '+:599 AVANTI MANeGEMF.NTrI NC. 3275.9E ABIR➢ PAIM IFE OJEPPAY60dt1' 193550 . _...__FA_CON➢SISFOSALUfft SERVICE -__�-__--}.6T9.06 . -..-._�._.77NC Pnm$ .. __.__ 193^51 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE f261133.35 aAPEOV! WELTER0. 10-29-86 195532 NRY SAFETY f SUPPLY f133.35 SAFETY SUPPLIF3 nl gP3554 _.�B AXT R S➢IENTIFI .AFRO[. .92.2B9.TW__. .__CAP, S9RCPIDNSERVICRS.PA-26.P1-36 P2-33671 193555 RANTER SCIENTIFIC M FROSTS S2.2E9.69 IAB SUPPLThS :93•55 ROE ERT BF.I Nr4ILL1 AN FROST A d3 SIG r623.S3 13TG]TA]'R1NG SERVICE RES 88-52 E97556 .. .BILLWILLIAMSI NG._I.NG. . .A919.10 .._ .3557 RILL LLII WELDING $313.I6 9EfD].IiG .9 755q RNA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. S27.00. _ .._� _.___.. 69L5BRINS ;93559 1191MPR 793560 bOYLE ENGINEERING CORM f19.766.76 _. ITG].lOATR 50NCCE J-17 997761 NRI THINF.E ELECTRIC EN71.71 FRED3HP +57'62 .._ INCUR 8 CALDWELNT.DIY..__...__. . .__ _._ .. 921•32 ._... _EBBIam `.63 BROWN R CALOWELL 78.229.77 EBB SERVICE 35G9 P.NRL'N L CALCVE LL CONSULTING t18.2P 9.T7 EDGIISFRIIS S®P/ICE RE 88-58 L5•,565 ._....__J1EU3tLPr5LPECN_PF G._S.R,_..___._. _f19e.+7Y--...._____7L1GI._ .___ 567 STILE NUB AEU CDNSCR U[iION CO. $99 r6U5.3o CIIBIRUCI'ICN 2-26-1 A-1 A9+.567 BUILDING NEWS, INC. _ . f561.15 PUBLICf ON L95`6 GNMEENGI,NfEAVNG_C11. liAl. OUC: PARTS 6. GART G. STFFEO $4g3.47 PITPTY ChH ft EI NBBRS8M8NT ' 351E C A R RECONDITIONING CO. f595.d0 MECHANICAL PART 03571 . ..__IlS.FgMP�b,Y,._._.-.. ___. _ .. __._ .._ _ .._. _._... _.3439•Nn frmar A97572 CAL dNtM SAL[S f157.10 _ P9)B¢R PIL]fllK3l9 --3F73 CALTROL r INC. $43.77 FREIGHT i 1, C FUND. NO� ^IS9 - JT GIST WORKING CAFITAL FAOCESSING DATE 6/P^/MP PAGE P REPORT NUMBER AP13 ._. .__. . —_ LDUR.IY_SiN1LATIDN 01SIEIL.IS-DE DRANL•LS CLAIMS PAID O7N 5/B9 WARRANT NO. __.. _ _ ._YINDOR_. . _ . _. __. AMOUNT __ _ ._OES CR I P T I ON. THE CALIFORNIA GUIOFP.00H 179.88 SURSC'RIPTICIN `;,F75 _.. ...__CLII.ICLSISIEM S. .._ ._ __ ...._ _.. . __... . $3,514.59 . .. .. PIRNB SERVICE ^9`576 CENTURY SAFETY ]MST. L SUPS . $992.66 SAI+EIY SUPPLIES 1e3P77 CHLMWEST INDUSTRIES. INC. f6J.494.11 IIERRC C� M.0.11-18-87 • 535ib .- .�..LMEYSON_U.S.A....INC._ .. ..... ------ ...__ . ._.. ._. $6.643..65- i•I9 CLFUGM.S kHUBAFP CO. $2,187.14 REFLOOD USER M OVERPAYMNP 1 9 P35A^ COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $5.647.2O mw EDUIP9ffi7P A 935b1 _._._C.1.C.3._.._C0...... _. ..._._.. .. _.__. )43'A2 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $2,317.41 O�ftR�^lY' R PAIN'S 193PP3 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $9,771.79 EfF(IIRIC SUPP 193569 __ 1 L1._ 0MSD0A.7LD_FRCI.GHTWAYS_—___.. _.. ..____ ..._.._._. PMRCJ7f 3VRS CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS 31.3P1.31 M1IEPRINITIO; 193`.P6 CONTINENTAL AIM TOOLS. INC. 557.51 7O0I. RENPBL .•Q567 ... __C.ON.TIMFHIAL_CHEMICALLY_._._____.._.__f9.3699..43_—_ __. _ pEUCWIPG.M.0.12719-66 '.43Pbk CONTROL CABLES. INC. $32.92 Tl6KR PlUfFS - - 193^E4 CONTROL DATA CORP. $131.39 )1SCRIGFI7P REPAIR C 9S S9'1 ... . _.C.ON7AQL.DAIA.CURED8AI10 _._.631.9..18 C 9.5!41 CONVEYOR COMPONENTS CO. 31.915.73 ELECTRIC SUmLrEs^ Fr) 0.3992 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES $49.32 MEHANI L PART X 191!93 . _ __EIAMIRIC SUPPLE _ 1-3S94 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL $4,473.30 CIUOlE RBNmAL to ^91595 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S684.O0 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES —• v`•`.46 __..—__CALJIALER_—_._.. ...._.____..___.. ._... _.. .._ _.. . ...595.00 ..... _____.._ .. ._. EfJ RIME;P _ --I )- !L97 LARRY CURTI TRUCK i EQUIPMENT $24.240.00 SUXGE RE MOM M.0.4-13-08 3! )93599 CUSTOM TURPO REBUILDING SI.C16.9P TPWc PARS 1 :93549 .. _._.—SLEEAEA_.______ _._.._____._____32.25.0.D0_..__.___..___._ SJiV m AGPIEIMT7P _ .. N ^91f31 EMPLOYMENT OEVELOFMENT DEPT 31077.10 SPATE @ifPPIDYMNB DiSIPA1fCE -43n 91 STATE OF CALIF. DEPT. OF GEN. 5166.44 PUBLICATICYI . ..R36O2 DNE...INC. ... .. .. . _. _ _. .._. .. .. __.... _$27.47 ._.. ._.. ... .. _. . . E'REIGNP . O43EA3 DANIELS TIRE. SERVICE $3,778.44 TIRES "^S6I4 TOM DAWES 514.36 MEET tS EXPENSE n9•f 45 __NLC.O____ _.._.__..._......_—._ tl.15..47 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES b91f P6 DELTA ROAN PRODUCTS1239.73 EAR SUP ES PLI ;v3tu7 DEW-PAR SALES R SERVICE SERVICE _1639.7P .. . . . . . . ._. .. ... . ._.. __.___ .. INSTRA441pATUSG^SfOP F 051 CO.CD. . +93P6P• DI ASSOCIATES $659.13 PREN u93t1A DISPOSAL CONTROL I. PEPYICE. INC. F6.J37.59 70)IIC 4D1S1'E DISRSAL 93611 DDPAD.0._FNIEEEPISLS._LNGA _._____....___. . ....._i16...37}.9R _.__._.__._�� PIANP MAINI'FIOLE G REMAINS__ r93612 DUNES MOTEL $245.65 REE'UNt USER FFE OVERPAYfDIlP 193613 DUNN EDWARDP CORP. 513.919.6O PAINT SUPPLIES Y P3414 LA S THAN._I MC, .. ... . . ..... _. ._._ .. P1.619.9T __. _ _ . .. OFPiCE SOPPi.iES . U93616 EMFIRE PIPE CLEANING A EQUIP. $5.362.24 SEVSt CS.EANING I 51.17O.23 __ _ DEEIMStIPPLEES 1 ..TEEN r9311F JOHN A. FALKENSICF.F. SI.$97.O0 MR SENICES P1-20 ,43R19 FE0I4PL CKPCE S; CORP.ON f97.u9 ATR [91EIGNP l C FUCK, NO 01'9 JT DIST VOFKINS CAPITAL PROCESSINP DATE 6128/0P PAGE REPORT NUMBED AP43 DISTRICTS-OF...OBANGE_C.OD.N11 ' CLAIMS FRIG Wi/06/80 e WARRANT NO. ... .__ VENPON. .. A40UNT DCSC4I-TION ^ 09.429 FERRO UNION INC. $397.34 PREER6 393b21 _FLLIER_SUPELY- CO. ...__.. _ __ __ .. S515.17 Mt1'IW4ICAL PARTS I'• U93612 FISCHER L PORTER CO. 1449.52 It51102MENT SUPPLIES 1.93623 GELPER RUNES. INC. $759.55 PUMP PARTS 0^3621 ...FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA ___. . . Si1.o6 llO PROCESSING d�3f 1S FOUNTAIN VALLFY PAINT S462.15 PAINT SUPPLIES (E`f 2E FROST ENGINEERING 3EkVICES CO. $427.46 MYSTWINNC ' 1..5627 r.6NAW-LUtlPTR. TQ. _..__ ..._ . 524332 45 __...._ _ ..._ 111PSER _ . �• 19B620 GATES FIBFRCLASS INSTALLERS $975 08 FLANGE !(3-1 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $1.524 12 TELEPHONE0 L93t}9 _DON GR0N-tl% A 5$DL..LNC._.._. .. _ _. __.__ ..._ 32.143.19 ,_. _,_.yTR3W1ICAL PARTS +93631 DON GRCEK S aSSOCIRTFS f2:.Y4 O.64 H0i1NPER1tS SERVICES OAK GRAZE BAEFlIDFf .93632 GRINNELL CORFOFATION S1.181.16 VALVE . J93633 _. _ ___HlLEB __163..6.2_.._.._._ .__... aDOREME TARP _. ._. ..__. ..� . S3634 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS S723.63 IISIRI}D77P PARTS ` 193f35 HATCH L KIRK. INC. 'SI.977.R4 SHEETS REIAIRS L� .� 9?3636 .}._A.�HSALi:.SO...___...._.__._-___. _._...}518.553.06._.... _ _. PI-23R ... .. ..�n ?34}7 HOFFBICER C.Y.S. CALIF. . INC. $3.435.56 @flFLSfPR PARTS FT 193638 HOOPER CAMERA STONES S327.92 FIIA1/CJVOSRA 'r 193639 hDVru Avtuy�EHIEILP�.I3F3 ._ }z17r.@0 ___1FUND USSR FEE CymPAraFr Sg34AP F.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $2,104.44 INURCHA✓L ..3641 HUNTINGTON PEACH RUPPER STAMP $211.04 RUBBER Sam •� .193F42 IE&_EN}IBWNEMT _._.. .-__.... ._}19.99_..._ .. _ . ..__..._ INEIT11FIENP 79RAIIi. _.. _ .....� i 93643 INDUSTRIAL Th READ[D PRODUCTS S1.263.5? F1TrIIw 3a 71n44 INFILCO OEGPEMONT. INC. 34.d92.26 BAR SEASONS SPSC F1178 i ^=3445 ...... ._ .._._. . ._._ . .B117I10RII16 SUPPLIES _ ,• :N p9 Sf 46 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY 26.219.50 TECHNICAL CCMPUTER SUPPORT i93A47 J.P. MILLEP CO..INC. 5524.58 MAINTENANCE lu r?SA4R 'RIVIERA 'FINANCE _ .. . .._ ... . ._ S991.17 JANCIORTAL SUPPLIES . . 14 1,93T49 JOF`S SWEEPING SERVICE $752.00 STRam SWEEPING " .•93650 KAMAN BEARINGS L SUFFLY S562.55 FITTING.. I.. 1.R3651 .___ __9AL-64Y..,LN�, ._.. .__.._ _ . _ _. ._ ._. . ._. $2,2¢Ba67._ .__ .. _. _. _._. TRANSMITTER . . 1113t52 KEEHAN A ASSOCIAIES $2.075.80 WORKERS CYIAP INSUWOICE ADMINISTRATION ^%3b53 KEFNAN SUPPLY $445.21 DATIVE PARTS 193654 _ ._.KELLY�EAM IFE£ ._. ..._.. ... __ _ _ . _ ._. ....._}11D.FQ... _ ._ T574iRNT' SF3MCE5 .93655 KIFYIT PACIFIC CO. s1.225094.28 OCISIAICTION PI-20.P1-31 •93t'_6 MIDt REARING. INC. S4012.17 SAFEPV SUPPLIES I • 19}657 __.�.1LOA_INOVAIN]4..9UFFU E S____.__. ._.._.. . . .._.._... }3 }25.10_ . _ ._ ._ . .. CFFPCE FIIRNTIIJPE. _ A93650 LA POTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS SI53.40 aD3IICA18 j 115659 jLEF L RO CONSULTING FNGR. $28.964.06 P2SIIOl]iRC SERVICES P1-23R.P1-24R.P1-31 P43660 ._LEWCO.ELFS7.@IC,CO.. _... .. ... _ _ S85.59. . _ TALKIE PARTS .. 143f 61 LEWIS FUBLISHENS. INC. $34.45 PUBLIMMCR 193662 LIMITORUU! COPP. S5.693.72 IISI1K18.O17f REPAIR W93f63 ._. _LDRAlILFgWPVEI3 SI_.473.OV SERVICE AGRIZQEN1'-PLWER _W -?fb4 M2 FNTERFRISC -- $538.12 TWA( PARTS ., A93F65 THE NAIL SECRETARY S94.25 LAMINATING _ _ _ 6: FUND NO 91119 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE• 6/23/FF PAGE 4 REPORT BUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID CL R 07/N76/eP WARRANT NO. .._. ._.., _VENDOR. . .__ ..__ _. . . . . . _. . ..A40UNI .. .. . .. DESCRIPTION f93F6E MALCOLP PIRNIC . INC. s1.681.E3 EVOINIONUMG SERVECFS P1-26 f43F67 RAB QLM_SWSC.N_. . ._.. ._.. _.. .. ... ..__. ._ _. .....__f)9.66 .. 700L _ ,.• 19366E - - MABMELL-ROBHINS. INC. 342.S8 E1SRUGIlP ;93f69 MATT - CHLOP. INC. 31.671.59 (]DDRINA75Q9 PARTS 093671 _ _MCCROMETEN. COPY. . .. ..__. .. .. __ ... . . -$113..12 Tf6TPoAO27f REPAIR ... . . ._ 93F71 MCMESNA cuop. R LPUIP. 211.537.38 OILERS 193f72 NCM451E A-CP2 FF SUPPLY CO.CN. f239.3] ._ PAR TS 1E73 INSTREOM' P NOS 0-3f75 MICAGE COMPUTER $1. . saRIE 1R3675 MILLERS PRINTERY $06.58 PRINDTO 393676 _.....MINE.BAHURT,_APPLIASTRUCTIONC.___... _s 95..]3.9.22__...__. SAFETY SUPPLIES -_.- _. ... ... a�srAdcT'iw rxeR-1 (93677 MLADEN HUNT MOO CONSTRUCTION CO s931224.49 P�PINC. EXPENSE 793f7A MICHAEL D. n00nE $III.99 4Y2679 ..__NOEGAN..A CELLULA SS. .-. ..__-.S$25.?3MO MOBILE PHONE 093Lpl MOTIONAL CELLULAR SERVICES f25.91 ^916P1 NATIONAL LUMBER M4,9.7 ECU I' 493682 ..-REALAHALflYf.FLY.S411.NSLL,__..__-__-_.-___._...$499.3D_- TP !9 eE3 MEAL SUPPLY CO. f999.97 --- EPl'PI1L.9 X �- 6A4 NELSON-OUNN. INC. $155.68 MECNINECAL PARTS 9 E95 N -ANIONIC POLYMER M O 812-87 f3.915..f1._. _ ._._ .. ... 79206 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $127.69 .93687 O.M.S. $945.10 VEROCCUPATIONAL VIS ICNO MF �13SSIS3.9.LL..._.__.-__._ WISGENEPWICIFT Yums0.11-18_87_ _. . 1 193EBa OCC UPATIONPL VI31 CN SERVICES 3167.e7 SPhTY Es -� +92693 MEGA LNGINEEPINR. INC. s147.45 1T IX � D 193(91 _ .__DM C.1LlY_P�LLA'T.JL_p NDr _„___-..._3.715.99___.-__ ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $605.46 -- E[FLTPEC EAIPeLIB4- 1 191(93 ORANGE. COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. s2.286.96 HYDROCHLORIC ACID ta`(94 _..ORANGE,CQUNTY .FAR.M. SUMIL-C_Q._ _ _._. . . ___.S129.84_. ...__ �S _.___ _ _. .. _ _.SPECIALTY dh= .91f95 OXYGEN SERVICE 3290.7E 'REIMBURSE WORKERS CORP s97f9E COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 33.958.25 >MON J-16 + P.'f9T __fAL.1fl.C_Ul.CIP IC3.1NSs._-.-�_._.�IIRR920.94 ._. .. -___.-__. _. .... . ... _ _. _ I• SR3699 PACIFIC FARTS 3499.61 SAFETY Sf@P116 Ir] 143699 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $712.91 TELEPHONE ) 1 PACTEL CCLLUVF 3113 Il - _....TI]IAAR SERVICE 9 17JT PAK WEST 1546.32 JAN11pCU.L SUPPLIES l7.3 . VECHANIM PARES (, 37C4 PARTS UNLIMITED $49 94 - -RSS1IX PA7815 3705 PEAT, MARWICK. MITCHELL S CO. $5.979 0U � eIOCE AAUDM R^SER'/ECF . 91776 PERMA.1.09.E_9P o00Ct5e 16c....___ _ __. t1s55 Ae15___...___..._ _ ..��ME� SUPPLIES ES SEWER PINw1NG .. _. ._. ' 193717 SAM W. PETERSON A ARSOC. 3436.R0 '9?16P PHOTO A SOUND CO. $432.80 RF10N.a7Ui['60IT1' .93749 . ._.._Y..IMA_GgQ_S,YSTEP.S., IIICa_ -._- _._ _.._._ _ . ._._. _ 371. 60..EC. ..... _. STUDIES REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 ,. '193714 POLY ENTERPRISES, INC. 1399.4E _ - SAFETY SUPPLIES - - - P93111 POSTMASTER 1111.00 P.O. ROE TEES 1 i FUND NO -199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FPOCESSING DATE 6/2-/RE PAGE 5 REPORT NUM3ER AP43 _... ._._ _ ...SAURT.Y_.SANILATI OR OLSFBLL .I CLAIMS PAID J7/06/89 WARRANT N0. _. _. ._-- ..-__—YENOOP_ __ _ . ._-.. _ _.. .. AMOUNT_. ._ .. . _ . _ DESCaIPTION .. ..' 593712 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE f93.00 ICE I• J'J 3713 _. __.FBI OR II.Y-ON I_ELE C 7 R 0 N 1 C5_ - - .. .... . . - . f369.52 . .. _ COMPUTER EQUIPMENT .. . 1' Jg3714 THE PROJECTS SOLU710N CO. f3.364.0P IIbfRUMENT INSPECTION lu 093715 PULSAFF.EDER 16.996.37 MBC}UVIICAL PARTS 093716 __QUEST IAJL..NONItOR SERVICE _____ ._ ___ ._ _. ._. $800.20. . _ _. _. - MONITOR REPAIR - og3717 COMMERCIAL FINANCING SERVIC'LS $245.54 FILTERS :9!l1R RCCYC. INC. S59.190.00 STIHJGE FM40 LM.O.2-30-88 .93719 .. .___RECOTE xrTE;R_RCSE113NG..fJS.ICd_ _.__.__._A U g!729 THE REPUBLIC SURREY CO. $1.117.23 ITT.TINGS 093721 RICOH CORPORATION 9270.00 COPIER LEGBES •�•• 093722 ...___RIL.BEAS.UREKENT..AND_CONTRNL_1NS—_.-__ ..____—__... .f1.J65.2T .._. ,S!723 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. f4.166.75 IlSE.T•ICIDE fgJ714 ROSEMOUNT ANALY. DIV. $1.571.17 THSTRIKENT SUPPLIES U93725 __1L01 AN1UN3fl00.UCIS_C0.___._ _ESGIRIC S0PPLI6 - --- 1191726 RUSTY PELICAN RESTAURANT SIw12.33 REMIND USER FEE 0VEPAYMENP 93728 . ___....SCIEUCE_A2ELLCALI ONS_1N.TIL_.____..,______.._f.11Ss1A7...98____._,.____OCBNN M1MT0lU1TG M.0. 6-10-87 _ .. - . ! .lg3727 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS f311.38 .'! 975J 729 SEACOAST ENTERPRISES. INC. f950.00 T1l 04!735 SEARS. ROEBUCK A CO. 095.51 � REPAIRS ail "C ng3751 ._ — —SEAMS, RaFRUCJLANO_C.0 SBS..I9--_—_.__TOOL - _ ._. _..._..._ __ ._._._ •.{ = 09]7J2 SE70N NAME PLATE CORP. ---- 1145.50 7] SIGN 5437J3 SEVEN-UP B07TLING CO. $53,905.85 Eby USER .� (93739 SH AMBDE6..-SUP.F LI____.__ Tools USER FfB (NPAPAYI•ffi71' �rl ....__.._ .. ___._______..._—_._33.$56.T2____._._____-TOOTS — . .. -_. . � 191736 SMALL BUSINESS REPORT 441.09 SUBSERII4TQ! f n 1v3736 SNITH-E NEPY CO. f2.441.09 I•'{I n937J7 __S4LL._eBD_I4.87.IN6_FNL1NEEflS___.__ _..__}lA D...O_._. .._—____ SOIL TESTING.. .P ::9I73H - SOIL TEST. INC. f113.59 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES �•' t5!739 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CD. f33.831.70 ]CANER I'{ P9774:1 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. _.... _ -. . . - _ $5.210.97._ _.. __ .. DISE6 El1EL "-1741 SFEC TECH WESTCPN IDA.1.34 REAIIAT0R PART 4 � 19374P SPCCTRUM CANSULTANS A SYSTEMS SI.25J OP CQL40.Tm '9!743 ._.SP.E C4NPSM ._.. _ ..—. _.. 1293..06. - _REUNI7 I15741 FEB.WERPAYNOSlP .9!744 SPIPFS RESTAURANTS, INC 6177 91 REIIUND USEIREFS WE@Att•02Tt' 114!745 STARCW STEEL $21210 S= �11 :93746 STAR_TQOL...4..SURE LY..CQa __.._.. __. __.. . _. 4215. 66 _ .___ _ ... TOOLS Oq!747 L S STARRETT CO. 1115 26 TOOL REPAIR R9 T4R JOHR STEGHENS9 JP $649 60 TPAVE`PEER REYIFN ,-179^ .._..... Efl.__ ,.—.__....}SWU../.4_�__._____.___R012ID USED FEE OVERPAYMENT.. uoJ7gp STRAUP GIST COMP. A324.59 U'ER FEE 0JFSPAYE0NE L„ t93751 ETHIC SHOF'I ING CCNTLR $123.02 RF8U AFQTRNDd1 USER PE: OVEPPAYEONT I, 193752 __SUMYLT37 EEL___ ...... .31.945.77. _. ._—_ENDS . 1-375J SUP f.LCO. INC. - f454.23 TAB SUPPLIES 193754 THE SUPPLIERS f5A134.2S HA IGE 01.9.1796 . . _ .... $652.5 4.. . _ ._ _ _ ATNAf PEFAER L' 09375A TAXMAN-CONN .714.51 ENDS PARTS , 193757 TEHMAP COMPANY f2.719.20 IJU3 SUPPLPFS � n C in h, L FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/29YOS PAGE 6 �. REPORT NUMBER AP45 i CLAIMS PAID 07/06/66 � 7 T 093758 TITAN SERVICES 5892.01 Rf@ USER FEE WO�PAbOTf r U i 095760 TONY•S LOCK 0 SAFE SERVICE $50.00 IDO( RF.PATR • 093761 TRAVEL TRAVEL 5150.00 TR9VO.SI=S u 4 093763 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT SI0.50 MEMBERSHIPsamil'E6 093764 UNION SIGN CO. I96.46 SAPEfE SUPP 1 893766 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR 5304.50 lP.IRJ9}WNCB CIYIIWCP 'e 093767 VLI CORPORATION 2150.00 REFUND LEBER FEE WO@AYMOIP 093769 VWR SCIENTIFIC 21,285.18 LAB SUPPLms ' ^ 093770 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 33.291.20 ROSNNECAL PARTS _a9 093772 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $702.14 SAFEM SUTTEES 093773 VORTEA INDUSTRIES I886.51 IFISTRLL ECdDI 093775 WALTER$ WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.120.25 Hfi44Tt SUPPLIES I'FI 093776 WAREHOUSE RESTAURANT $919.32 RFFIDO IDIOT FEE O✓EIU 1 iP X S 093778 WEST COAST TERMINALS. INC. s3.704.TO �m tOXI@D: Q 093T79 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $32,202.97 cAUST0:C 6�N M.0.5-13-07 f UP S, I 'IF 093781 MILLDAM ASSOCIATES 16,824.70 P SIUAL SONDTS D19C 2M D 093702 WILSON•S EQUIPMENT RENTALS.INC 31.700.00 ByUCPIFMP S@7IIS . u Ol 093784 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES --'-- $1- -103.19 VALAE9 �' J '• TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/06/88 of 8011590 IS $6,361,522.61 • J J C L 61881 DD 9199 JP DIET 52)A93347 CAPITAL P161CJ_C6M M 6/29/88 PA 7 Dy ' tAP9FA M43 mIMY 9MII2A W DI9lRIClS OF OIN3GE COl07K • „ CIA3M PAID 07/06/88 81lfRYD' AMR87f O 1 • 1 2 OM F1M1 8 1,919.13 / 7 FF/R 101,766.12 3 OP81t PUlO) 4,695.26 i �• / 3 ACD fl283 104,790.05 1 5 OP01 818ID 2,033.07 W88 PIQVD 4,377.50 '• 4 7 OPFA P1301 19,805.81 1 11 OPOt F1t81 344.17 �66 OPOt FIBID 2,088.57 4 566 AW F@ID -t,9387854,11- 18.786.73 667 OP02 FVID 32.51 19Tf OPEA F➢A 2,676.17 l +0 3T OPW2 F1P0) 666,934.18 NeF 5,262,970.52 Fl3IDID FDWD35 QTID R81D1AtiCE F1Pd1 6,733.25 • IT1 JT 5A16fI61G CAPITAL Fidb 161,569.E is $6,361.522.61 fD + J ol so , J v FUND NO C.99 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING D J RT[ 1/13/BB PAGE l R 4P03 0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 07,29,00 WARRANT NO. '. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION A 93 P10 A.F. INOUSTPI AL ENGINEER POMP IN6 fA95.00 P PUTSn C° 093811 A.R.A. MANUFACTURING CO. $119.57 TRUCK PARTS , eTY_SUPPLI68 v 093813 AT N T $659.74 TELEPHONE mr I F'\' a 093 eta ACADEMY OF DEFENSIVE DRIVING 3800.00 DRIVER TRAINING INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES- 1p C93P16 ADMIRAL ROOFING $7.250.99 BUILDING REPAIRS I D93817 AERO TECH SURVEYS. TNC. 3409.00 TOPOGRAPHICAL MAPS 1. BIGEAETS �.� 093819 AIR PHOTO SERVICES t159.00 PRINTS n 093020 AIP PRGDUCTS L CHEMICAL INC. t2.938.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS ceT-cNAaces --_ 093822 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE 33.223.96 VEHICLE LEASES 093823 ALLIED CORPORATION 125,553.96 CATIONIC POLYMER H.D. 3-11-67 6. DIET. CEO 093825 ALLOY DIE CASTING $1.979.64 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT 093826 ALL PURE CHEMICAL t37.316.70 CHLORINE M.O. I0-I4-87 NTNUGTIOG-O}vT A �.. ' 093B2B THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 32.769.97 HARDWARE IT7093B29 ANDERS ON AS PAVING CD. t1.3U9.56 ASPHALT PAVING A-PLUS SYSTEMS 31.500.08 - PRINTING b093832 APPLE ONE $746.73 TEMPORARY SERVICES RNIENTAL9 E. ""IC 9l8l9 ARENAL MOTEL $269.22 REFUND USER HE OVERPAYMENT •p 093835 ARI20NA INSTRUMENT $814.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS HRUNOJIRER REE.LVvoo.wvui_._— c• 1-+093937 ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES ' 290.00 LAB SERVICES 093838' B E T HYDRAULICS 311D92.51 MECHANICAL PARTS Blc- 011 REIMBURSEMENT.ACREEMBNL �•, ° 093895 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 315.098.I0 GRIT REMOVAL M.O. I0-29-86 093N91 BACHARACH. INC. 307.65 COMPUTER REPAIRS •"LDING-MAYBE AL9 0938A3 P4RE I SQUARE p522 360.92 REFUND U8E0. PEE OVERPAYMENT �' ° 0938RA BANK OF An AIDA NT&SA S999.72 BANK CARDS g.3". n .1A 70 rE¢TIPICATES_m_DEPOSIL NSTALL3AY 093896 P.V. :ARCTTI AND ASSOC. f9.623.0C CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-26,P1-31.P2-33630 993fl47 FIR BAS6ALL $20.25 EMPLOYES MILEAGE L c. 0938 B INDUSTRIAL CO. H9.00 METER REPAIR -- 995850 90 BLACK LACK 9 YEA TCH 38.178.20 ENGINEERING SNRVTCNB OTBT 7 —011,851 BOLSA RAN0YDJLLTERVICE a2y21 RADIATOR_REPAIR 093B52 BOLSA RADIMEOR SERVICE i1P9.10 ENGINEER NGPSER I 093P.. BOIL F. ENGI ME CORPi29..... ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-10-1 .a'•� NEERI° 093B95 P0.0VN 8 CALDY ELL CONSULTING 520.597.6tl ENGINEERING SERVICES RBB 87d34 i G17 w Cw �� I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST HORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/13/BS PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 1 C.1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ° WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT• DESCRIPTION 42 093856 BUILDING NEWS, INC. $42.40 PUBLICAROM 093P57 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE f5/.98 PUBLICATION • 02331 IN' _ ° 093 B5 9 GARY S. STREED sgos.76 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ° 093860 C B R RECONDITIONING CO. fS.99]•DO PUMP PARTS • -09386L rq rn..n Aur .•n..+._ ._ VALVER. __...._—..-- 093862 CAL•CHEN SALES •nSl25.B0 tlAPONARe e n 093 R6S CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO.. INC. $71•B1 PUMP PARTS 093866 NN CARO LL O ENGINEERS f233.85 8.11 ENGINEERING SERVICES BPI-36.P1-22.3-6-2.J-IS 093866 CENTEL SYSTEMS 3840.1E TELEPHONE 9ERWCES —NAIdTENANCE.3ART• j c' 093860 CHEMHEST INDUSTRIES. INC. f53.722.69 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O. 11-18-87 i 093869 A.Y. CHESTERTON CO. $1.343.34 PUMP PARTS 093871 CHICO GAME FISH FARM $52.25 LAB SUPPLIES 093872 CHRISTEVE CORP. $52.788.06 CONSTRUCTION 11-16 S B'E3 WORKERS COMP_LlSDRAMCEII.IL�1i-88.— �. ' 093674 C.I.E.S. . CO. • INC. f3.616.55 STEEL 01093875 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF f1Y702.B8 VALVES X OR3 B76 n .. ..... . ... .81„6. TMUre oevee 093877 CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS f122.95 FREIGHT W 093878 CONSOLIDATED, ELECTRICAL 01ST• $21.791.27 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ."4P OL3. 093880 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS. INC. $273./8 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 1" 093881 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $7,952.12 CHLORINE M.O. 12-10-86 ]8 — IF3883 CORDOVA BOLTS $25.64 FITTINGS 093e84 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPFLY $1.169.66 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS R,BB! CCU,." uu n.ES ACE °L ECT•TC ...0 1, MECTRIC.SUPPLIES---- �. 093886 CAL WATER $213.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 093887 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT $1.371.00 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURACE Ar 0938'89 STATE OF CALIFORNIA f160.00 ANNOTATION Y68 j c '• 093B90 STATE OF CALIFORN IA f530.28 DIESEL USE TAR •� g3o•. _ Al"E IWdRWUB_WA= TAR __ c_ D93092 DAILY PILOT $29.00 ADVERTISING 093893 0AN IELS TIRE SERVICE $693.56 TIMES nyylr.R sUPPLIEg_ ` 093F98 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 5643.42 PRINTING C� 093896 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE. INC. $4.557.31 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL .uTCAL PARTA 093898 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $20.795.49 - MECHANICAL REPAIRS 093899 HSN-DECKER / BORIC SCIENTIFIC 1157.11 CAVCB yUTIMTND_REPATsa L; • 093902 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1.747.10 PAINT SUPPLIES Is 1 T • . FUND NO .9 - JT 015T VOPNiN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING ERE 7/13/BP PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Q° WARRANT NO. VENDOR - AMOUNT DESCRIPTION C a 093902 EASTMAN. INC. $3.216.31 -----_ OFFICE SUPPLIES —_— --- 99690 94077 Y. M. EBERT CORP. S1.120.168.80 CONSTRUCTION 5-29 ° J4 ... 00 OCEANOGRAPHIC_SERvImE O._6-10= c e 093905 FST SANO AND GRAVEL. INC. f323OS BUILDING MATERIALS 09390E FALCON DISPOSAL SEA VICE $9.561:23 GRIT REMOVAL 0. JOHN B FALN6NSTRIN P 8 ••-644r99 ----CON9]iUCT10N_SCBFIC63.P1 30—__ c" 093908 FARR SALES 0 SERVICE $2.364.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 093909 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP. $55.25 AIR FREIGHT 6 "`CAL PART• �. " 093911 FISCHER 0 PORTER CO. . $l.N 6.3E INSTRUMENT PARTS 093912 FLAMINGO MOTEL 1192.40 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT —PING'PARTS—_— —.— �1° 093914 CLIFFORD A. FOPMERT 3779.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 093915 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA S103.31 PHOTO PROCESSING pC G11A C,, 093927 FREOSON $342.30 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 093918 CITY OF FULLERTON $102.83. WATER USPAGB UILDINC 09]920 GARPATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $09.68 BOILER PART 093922 6AT ES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $975.00 FLANGE FABRICATION tlOUP co ° 093923 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES 4226.33 COMPUTER PARTS W093924 GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SER. $201.40 SOMME —093925 ALV83_ — 093926 GROIN EQUIPMENT CORP. 3941.11 MECHANICAL PARTS W093927 HATCH E KIRK. INC. S1.591.52 MECHANICAL PARTS PJBIAY28.I1 e W093929 HOERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. , INC. $165.04 VALVE 093930 R.C. HOFFMAN C. S385.44 INSTRUMENTS 1-1 33 _CAN6RA(pILlL -- C.. ' 093932 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 22,939.66 GAMEIES 993933 R.S. HUGHES CO., INC. $511.79 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _UgpR_SPE.LVERPAwM✓ �. 093935 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $10,148.24 WATER USEACB 09393E MUNTINGTON SUPPLY 9113.84 HARBWARE —SBFUND_USER.FEE.IIYP.BPAYMvue �- 093938 HYOPOTEN $2,252.01 OIL 993939 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,094.71 FITTINGS ICAL LIE �. 093991 INTERN PAPER 1141.30 REPINE USER FEE 093992 INTERNATIONAL SEAL CO. f191.30 REFUND USER P88 OVEIPAYMEPl 70_DU SOIL SAMPLING -0EIINEIm3 c 093945 IRVINE 6EOTEC WATERL CONSULTANT s1.22B.UG WATER 9USEAGEG 093995 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT i26.65 NATEB USPAC6 TRUCK _USBR.PZEDYERPA 093997 JACK R CHANGE 223q,50 TAUCR YARTB o P • FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/13/88 PAGE n I: l•. REPORT NUMBER AP43 ,'f111 LJ COUNTY SANI7ATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY • WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 093948 RIVIERA FINANCE $720.7R JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 093949 JONES 8 STOKES A530C..INC. f9.290.26 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART 88-27 44, 1C. 093951 KAY-RAY, INC. t11,32.0: =s 11TER 093952 MARTHA KINKEL 6 STEVEN P. s2.000.00 LIABILLITY CLAIM • 2.4 an MGB/9ARDYARR - �. 0(3951 KOML.S HALLMARK CENTER S45.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 093955 LAYTON SOFT WATER $2.918.69 R8I9Hill USER FEE OVERPAYMENT TJAM/PROCESSFN 093957 LEWIS PUBLISHERS. INC. $89.95 PUBLICATIONS 093958 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY 916B.80 CYLINDER REPAIRS BGETTING 093960 LIMITOROUE CORP. f2.656:66 PUMP PARTS 093961 N.P. LINOSTROM. INC. f9.25S.49 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SRVICES .I MFUTBR-GONA=TN 093963 LOGO INC. $145.16 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 093961 M.G. INDUSTRIES 9127.20 LAB SUPPLIES i 27 DT RRVIC6S I 093966 RALCOLM PIRATE . INC. fI9.305.01 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-20 j C MM109396T MARVAC ELECTRONICS s97.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES i RFNATION�WALF88 093961 MCCROMETER CORP 3371.28 INSTRUMENT PART l• b] 093970 NC KENNA ENGP. 0 EQUIP. S12.005.09 PUMP PARTS APBTi-BURP6F88 �•. 993972 SEA TORERO IPMENT• INC. sIBS d 9 BAIIRRI¢3 THE MEDITERRANEAN INN $167.62 REFUND USER PEE OVERPATMENE to !!!!77.! NG7RWMBIA-RBPA2R 093975 MICROASE COMPUTER $16.343.88 COACHMEN SYSTEM , 1 0193976 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $91.16 RUBBER PRODUCTS 7 ART lllt fliT 80 IDOL --- - ;,;� 993978 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES s78.72 WHILE PHONE 11 093979 NEAL SUPPLY CO. s9.66 FITTINGS •, t 093981 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 98.52 WATER USEAGE 0.3982 NEWPORT CYR. MEDICAL SLOG PI $359.15 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 1GHT 093989 UNITED NOTTINGHAM 1266.60 SEMTAL EQUIPMENT ' 093985 O-BRIEN MACHINERY COMP. $153.543.00 GENERATOR M.O. 11-10-87 eCTRFC-SUFALI-, 093967 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. $926.14 FITTINGS 11 c" 993980 OAYGEN SE V ICE rr $3.226.19 SPECIALTY GASES — — 117 E9 niiu TY ns n 7}.I3i.00 Bl6POSN.-0ASB "- 093990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $3.503.25 REMORSE WORKERS CORU' INSURANCE 993991 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $336.E0 WATER PRODUCTION • � a., AD MHBTFNFR8G16TRAi3(111 • L 393993 PSI $117.20 FITTINGS P� i FUND NO (a99 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/13/80 PAGE 5 i REP OAT NUMBER AP43 0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY '1 1 17 Q; WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT _ DESCRIPTIONS �— �� 093994 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $1.817.68 —T SAFETY SUPPLIES 093995 PACIFIC BELL 330.57 TELEPHONE ° MECHANICAL-PARTS — n e 093997 PATTEN CORP./ TAYLOR INTTR. .SH.13 STRIP CHARTS 093998 J.M. PETERS CO.. INC. f11.363.14 BIG CANYON REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ° 3R8 —�FPICB-BQUIPMENA------------ ., 094000 PITNEY ROVES 9314.00 METER REPAIR 094001 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE 2152.06 HARDWARE —MEHCTRPSLBPARTS i Qu 094003 POWERHOUSE HOLDING INC. $!ELSE MECHANICAL USE PARTS •� 1° 099009 PRI MU9 HOLDING CO. 'f 186.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ;i UF80.-PARTS 1 �1° 099006 THC PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. f3.3B0.00 INSTRUMENT INSPECTION u7 094007 PROP. 65 NEWS $250.00 PUBLICATION ° °0 33° A6 FEN-PARTS --- 099099 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. $1,507.21 PUMP PARTS 094 P10 RADIAN CORP. $0.331..02 LAB SERVICES IN-ABHOVAL C• ° 094012 RED WING SHOES' S1J1.T2 SAFETY SHOES m099013 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $794.64 ELECTRIC INTER vu K LFfR1 HGTSC69— - - „C iy 099015 PEMEDY TEMP $39209.1E TEMPORARY SERVICES IM094016 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. $3.025.77 INSECTICIDE "" NGTRUNENT�BPPIIBR--_ — C,, 099016 JOSEPH T. RYERSON C SON. INC. $1.299.35' METAL LZ094019 S.P.F. MACHINERY ENG.. INC. $472.50 MOTOR REPAIR 9A-02^ BANCON-CNG3NLGRJ WO .-- ....... 00 811CIWHeAINC�BRVLCeB--MAN80LLSUR °1 1T1099021 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L $5,432.00 OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH M.0.6-10-87 094022 SEA COAST DESIGNS f136.79' OFFICE MACHINE A A23_ 9r+nN NANF eL,ATr r _ ae°a.e° OAPRTY_SICN----- 099C29 SHAMROCK SUPPLY n°^ S112:18 HARDWARE 099025 9NE POE RO MACHINERY CO. $3.01161 TRUCK PARTS i-88RVICSR-- �) c1 099027 SMITH INTERNATIONAL f969.21 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 094028 IN I TN PIPE E SUPPLY. INC $649.42 PLUNGING SUPPLIES 1 DIL-TESTING- ---______ 09903E SORENSON•R PATA'S SHOP $2.932.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 099931 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $39.070.26 POWER —NATURAL-GAS -- 094033 SO. CALIF. VATFB CO. $37.59 WATER USEAGE •1 L 0194034 SPEC TECH WESTERN $456.93 REGULATOR PART 'IA..nSft .r.enu .Trn •A6R-+1 ^t68L-- 099036 STAR TOOL S SUPPLY CO. $1,864.04 TOOLS •� C"°+ 094937 SCOTT STEVFNS $23.70 BREMER MILEAGE 094039 SUMMIT STEEL $1,424.69 --2NOTOCMPtliC-SRRVIOSO... __. C NRTAL i Q.� ml FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/13180 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 L-J COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUN71 . 1 C A 'WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION C 094040 THE SUPPLIERS $1.476.51 HARDWARE 091011 SU0.VIVAIR $276.01 WRIT INSPECTION ° '-81II.A0-, CONTRACT CROUDSKEBPIN 094043 TAYLOR�DUNN $16.32 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS '{ C 094011 TENMAR COMPANY 9493.88 LAB SUPPLIES 134.00 ---US 4ERVICES---------- -- ; C� 994046 THREE N CO. f187.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 094047 IRO DELAVAL INC. $624.11 ENGINE PARTS U VNL-86RVIC8 i r 094049 H.O. TRERICE CO. $181.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ' 094050 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLYI INC. 51.029.13 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS INSTRUMENT PART--_._ 'I 094052 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTER.INC. f193.67 AUTOMOTIVE GLASS REPAIR ,+ 094053 UNOCAL $176.11 GASOLINE ° FF166-EUPPbiR3 ---- ,.� 09A999 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE f185.09 PARCEL SERVICE 091055 UNI TCD VEST ERN ELEVATOR $319.75 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 094958 UNIVERSAL TRUCK BODY. INC. "N." TOOL BOX In P94059 UNIVERSITY SALES L SERVICE $383.06 TRUCK PARTS GO rZ. n9AP61 VYR SCIENTIFIC - f1r790r 21 LAB SUPPLIES 094 062 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY COA f21990.6$ SARYARE 0.1 —W-SUPPLIES ----- -- C -1094064 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY SID1.82 SAFETY SUPPLIES 091065 JOHN R. NAPLES $509.63 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTING Co -Do An INSURANCE LIABILITY-AWI3NLBOWA ;� C �C71094067 WAUKESHA ENGINE $CRVICENTER $750.37 MEOBANICA, PARTS 09916E WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SRV. 1750.40 LAB BERVIC68 LABGSERVICUPPLF66-- �- 094070 ROY-WHITE P. YES TON. INC. .096.97 JANITORIAL TORIALS 09"32 WHITE CAP ]NO..INCr f2.096.07 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES WILeTRINNeNF 6UPPblEB- , + C 099073 YILLCAN ASSOCIATES f15.12i.B0 ENGINEERING SERVICES SEE 87-147-2 094074 ROURKE A WOODRUFF f29.736.26 LEGAL SERVICES M.O. 10-14-87 60PIER-LEASER-- IF - j �- 094C76 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES f129.Pb VALVES ----------------- 51 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID-07/20108 $7.081.096.96 I '1 Q el FUND 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/13/88 PAGE 7 COUNTY SANITION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REPORT NUMBER AP43 ` ' CLAIMS PAID 07/20/88 .1 C SUMMARY - AMOUNT 41 CONST FUND S 977,440.65 42 OPEN FUND 19,509.60 89 FIR RIM 36,136 77 .-' �,• /2 C0N5T FUND 1,753,009.75 /3 OPEA FUND 27,931.99 ST F 95 OPER FUND 9,767.25 .1 5 F/R FUND 32,466.11 fig pFg_FUNn 2= .07 c 46 ACO FUND 2.24 P7 OPEN FUND 12,089.65 i D_FUND' ,. "8! C'° P7 F/R FUND 9.802.86 P11 OPEN FUND 8.360.20 I C0._F.UNO 66.308.9; P13 OPER FUND 899.56 l� i,1 114 OPEN FUND 118.65 x . �-. P566 OPER FUND 50 4546 ACO FUND 1,120.432:115 614_O2EA_EnNn 16M.BM . � r —I JT OPER FUND 463,267.26 �y CORF 532,896.04 DRXFR% VMP Ina RANrr cuNn 9,647.47 + f ' V JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 132,405.68 7. 8� 3�806.06 i i io REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN SEPTEMBER 14 , 1988 1) ANNUAL CASA CONFERENCE ALONG WITH CHAIRMEN EDGAR, HANSON, HART, POLIS AND WAHNER, I ATTENDED THE ANNUAL WORK CONFERENCE OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES IN MONTEREY LAST MONTH. IN ADDITION TO TALKS BY DARLENE RUIZ OF THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND JOHN WISE, DEPUTY REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR FOR EPA, THE PROGRAM INCLUDED AN INTERESTING DISCUSSION ON WATER CONSERVATION. . . AND OUR STAFF PRESENTED A SESSION ON OCEAN MONITORING INCLUDING A REVIEW OF MARINE LIFE AROUND OUR OUTFALL. THERE WERE ALSO SEVERAL VERY INFORMATIVE PRESENTATIONS ON POTENTIAL LIABILITY OF PUBLIC AGENCIES REGARDING' EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE ISSUES, PROPOSITION 65, SLUDGE DISPOSAL, BIOMONITORING FOR EFFLUENT TOXICITY; AND AIR QUALITY ISSUES AFFECTING POTW'S. - ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE - -1- 2) MEETING WITH SCAQMO SPEAKING OF THE IMPACT OF EMERGING AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS ON THE ABILITY OF SEWERAGE AGENCIES TO MEET WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. . . LAST WEEK WE HELD A MEETING WITH THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THE MEETING WAS ATTENDED BY MYSELF AND DICK EDGAR FROM OUR DISTRICTS AND HANK WEDAA OF THE SOUTH COAST AIR DISTRICT BOARD; AS WELL AS HIGH LEVEL STAFF MEMBERS FROM BOTH AGENCIES. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS HOW BOTH AGENCIES MIGHT CARRY OUT THEIR RESPECTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL MISSIONS WITHOUT GETTING IN EACH OTHER'S WAY. WE TOOK THE AIR DISTRICT PEOPLE ON A TOUR OF OUR TREATMENT PLANTS TO HELP ACQUAINT THEM WITH SOME OF THE PROBLEMS. I THINK THE MEETING WAS POSITIVE AND PRODUCTIVE AND WE HAVE MADE CONSIDERABLE PROGRESS SINCE- THE ISSUES FIRST SURFACED LAST YEAR. WE AGREED TO CONTINUE MEETING ON A REGULAR BASIS IN AN ATTEMPT TO ARRIVE AT A MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING ON HOW TO BEST ACHIEVE BOTH WATER QUALITY AND AIR QUALITY STANDARDS. INCIDENTALLY, THE AIR DISTRICT STAFF INDICATED THAT A PERMIT FOR THE $53 MILLION CENTRAL POWER GENERATING PROJECT PROPOSED BY THE DISTRICTS WILL BE FORTHCOMING. .J - ITEM 3 ON NEXT PAGE - -2- 3) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28TH AT 5:30 P.M. ( INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: ) GENE LEYTON f ILIP MAURER AND OR OR WILLIAM MAHONEY SALLY ANNE MILLER v -END OF REPORT- -3- ' MEETING DATE 9/14/88 TIME 7:30 PN DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13 6 14 DISTRICT I JOINT BOARDS µ 1A (CRANK)........HANSON....... (DAVIS)............ARNOLD...... V/NRYNwWN (YOUNG)........GRISET...... (PICNLER)..........SAY......... _ �/ (EDGARI........MOESTEREY... (MURPHY)...........BPBBWBOR.... (ROTN).........S TANTON..... (NORBY)............CA TL IN...... _ (PLUMMER)..........COX......... _ DISTRICT 2 (PERRY)............CULVER......7 (KENNEDY)..........EDGAR.......7 (HOBBY)........CATLIN......� _ _ (WINCNELL).........6YiNiWL....✓ (FLORA)........MAHONEY.......le- (MC CUNE)......... .GRIFFIN..... li _ (PICKLER)......BAY.........y (YOUNG)............GRISET......}L (MURPHY).......BEBBMOM....� (CRANK)............HANS ON.....: _ (YOUNG)........GRISET......JC_ (COX)..............HART........jC (NELSON).......6644E ..... ► _ (EDGAR)............HOESTEREY...JG (SCOTT)........NEAL........ (EDGAR)............KENNEDY..... r (TYNES)........NEWTON..... (NELSON)...........NNTBIR..... (CULVER).......PERRY.......JC (FLORA)............MAHONEY.....�� (PASSENGER)...•SILZEL......5�__ (PLUMMER)..........MAURER...... 1� (PEREZ)........SMITH.......JE_ (GREEN. P).........NAYS........ (ROTH).........STANTON.....y✓_ _ (AGRAN)............NI LLER. 5... (BIGONGER).........MURPHY....... DISTRICT 3 (SCOTT)............REAL........ (SUTTON)...........NELSON...... _ (HERMAN).......POLIS ......✓ (TYNES)............NEWTON...... (WEISHAUPT)....SAPIEN......JL (CULYER)...........PERRY.......J. (DAVIS)........ARNOLD......J6 _ _ (HERMAN)...........POLIS........ (PICKLER)......BAY......... ./ (STANTON)..........ROTH........L (MOREY)........CATLIN...... (WEISHAUPT)........SAPIEN......JC (PERRY)........CULVER......�s_ (WILES)............SIEFEN......�G (WINCHELL).....8ROIfiMG...... C (PASSENGER)........SILZEL......jC (MC CLINE)......GRIFFIN.....J<__ _ (PEREZ)............SMITH.......jC (YOUNG)........GRISET...... = _ (ROTH).............STANTON.....�,C_ (FLORA)........MAHONEY....._L` (NELSON)...........SUTTON........ (SCOTT)........NEAL........y (MILLER. D)........SWAN........�t (SUTTON).......NELSON...... li_ (WANLSTROM)........SYLVIA......JC (WILES)........SIEFEN...... ✓_ (GREEN.H/JOMNSON)..WAHNER....... (ROTH).........STANTON.....JC_ (HUNT).............WILSON...... (WAHLSTROM)....SYLVIA......J� (HUNT').........WILSON........IC_ _ STAFF: DISTRICT 5 SYLVESTER...Y BROWN......... (COX)..........HART........✓_ ANOERSON....-jt (PLUMMER)......COX.......... _ CLARKE......J� (STANTON)......ROTH........Jp— _ CLAWSON.......6, DAWES.......�s DISTRICT 6 DEBLIEUX'...._ FILECCIA:..._ (JOHNSON)......WANNER...... 6/_ HODGES...... (PLUMMER)......MAURER......—/_ _ KYLE........}s (STANTON)......ROTH........ LINDER....... OOTEN.......�t DISTRICT 7 STAE F.D......Jc VON LANGEN (KENNEDY)......EDGAR.......✓ WINSOR......jt (AGRAN)........MILLER. S...T (PLUMMER)......COX.........J.e (YOUNG)........GRISET......Jt (STANTON)......ROTH......... (PEREZ)........SMITH.......JL (GREEN, H).....HAMNER......�6L_ OTHERS: WOODRUFF....A� IDE.........ii DISTRICT 11 ANWAR......._ DEMIR........ (GREEN. P1.....MA'S........J�_ HOIIEIIER.....JG (WINCHELL).....follow.....— HOUGH.......JC (ROTM).........STANTON..... HOWARD.... .. HUNT. ..... .. DISTRICT 13 KEI TH'.. . .. ..y KNOPF... .. .. (SIGONGER).....MURPHY...... ✓ LINDSTROM. .._ (PICKLER)......SAY............ LYNCH... .. .. (STANTON)......ROTH........ L/ ST014E... .. .. IPEREZ)........SMITH........ � WA SON... .. .. (NELSON).......SUTTON...... YOUNG.. ... .. DISTRICT 14 (MILLER. D)....SWAN........ (EDGAR)........KENNEDY..... (AGRA")........MILLEA. S...� (STANTDN)......ROTH........ �— (PEREZ)........SMITH....... J 07/14/88 SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 PLEASE SIGN IN i Name Agency/Firm 3 e 9-14-88 JOINT MEETING NOTES q6(a) - Re qrt of the Joint Chairman The Joint Chairman reported that he and Chairmen Edgar, Hanson, Hart, Polis and Wahner had attended the Annual Work Conference of the California Association of Sanitation Agencies in Monterey in August. In addition to talks by Darlene Ruiz of the State Water Resources Control Board and John Wise, Deputy Regional Administrator for EPA, the program included an interesting discussion on water conservation. The Districts' staff also presented a session on ocean monitoring, Including a review of marine life around our outfall. There were also several very informative presentations on potential liability of public agencies regarding employer-employee issues, Proposition 65, sludge disposal , biomonitoring for effluent toxicity and air quality issues affecting POTW's. Chairman Smith then reported on a meeting the previous week with the South Coast Air Quality Management District on the impact of emerging air quality regulations on the ability of sewerage agencies to meet water quality standards. The meeting was attended by the Joint Chairman, Director Dick Edgar, Hank Medea of the SCAQMD Board, as well as high level staff members from both agencies. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss how both agencies might carry out their respective environmental missions without getting in each other's way. Districts' staff took the Air District people on a tour of the treatment plants to help acquaint them with some of the problems. The Joint Chairman indicated that he thought the meeting was positive and productive and we have made considerable progress since the issues first surfaced last year. It was agreed to continue meeting on a regular basis in an attempt to arrive at a mutual understanding on how to best achieve both water quality and air quality standards. He added that in discussions with Hank Wedaa, he had indicated that they really want to cooperate and work together. He also noted that the Air District staff indicated that a permit for the $53 million central power generating project proposed by the Districts will be forthcoming. Director Edgar commented that the conversation was very direct. We stated that we are committed to do the best technical job that can be done and we will fight like crazy when there are artificial things in front of us. With solid technical backup, we will do the best we can. Chairman Smith then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, September 28, 1988, and invited Directors William Mahoney and Philip Maurer to attend. #6(b) - Report of the General Manager The General Manager reiterated that in July staff reported that the California Department of Health Services and the EPA had issued their draft report on the �. proposed alternative plans for long-tern cleanup of the Stringfellow Waste Disposal site. DOHS and EPA have announced a public meeting in Fountain Valley on September 29th to review the draft feasibility study and cleanup plan. He advised that included in Directors' meeting folders was a copy of the Notice of the September 29th meeting. Staff is completing its review of the feasibility study and will be mailing a summary of their analysis to each Director in the next few days. Once it is received, he asked Directors to call the staff if they have any questions. Staff will be appearing at the Fountain Valley meeting and offering oral and .� written comments. The General Manager then reported that one year ago the Board approved the Districts' Action Plan. It is the most comprehensive study ever undertaken in the nation by a POTW. It will prepare us for our ocean discharge permit in 1990. It is a 30-year plan. An important aspect of the plan is the Community Outreach Public Information Program to inform the public and gain their support. He noted that an attachment to the Selection Committee Report showed the outcome of group meetings held in July. Last week and this week a series of public workshops will be held. Mr. Sylvester advised that a new brochure that will be used in the public workshops and a fact sheet and schedule of the Action Plan activities was included in the Directors' meeting folders. A video has been produced along with the brochure which is shown at the start of the public workshops. The Plan is still in the early stages. We are about 1/3 through the effort. Will continue to brief the Directors and keep them apprised. The video was then presented to the Board. Directors asked if it was available to the public and were told yes, in 3/4. 8 112H tape. Director Silzel asked if staff was interested in presenting this to professional groups? Staff replied, absolutely, to any company with particular interest in our process. We will be mailing out notices to over 2,000 companies with potential interest in our program. Silzel added that as Program Chairman of the Business Industries of Los Angeles and Orange County, we are looking for program items for the coming year. He suggested that Directors give staff other suggestions. The General Manager indicated that they would welcome that and that they would be contacting many of those groups directly. Don Smith noted that this video was scheduled to be presented at the City of Orange Rotary Club next month. Asked Directors to call staff if anyone is interested. 86(c) - Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported that there was a Supplemental Agenda item re Job No. J-7-4. Although it was not terribly significant, it did need immediate attention because of time requirements. He added that there were also two items to be reviewed in closed session relative to matters of litigation. ►11(a) - Staff report re Job No. P1-27 Tan Dawes reported on Job No. P1-27 which includes the new entrance off the 405 Freeway. He advised that only one bid was received. The Engineer's estimate was $1.5 million and the bid was $1.78 million. Staff was disappointed that we only received one bid. This is a job that requires a lot of subcontractors (10-12) and contractors sometimes shy away if there are other jobs available. Staff recommended that the Board reject the single bid and authorize negotiation with on-site contractors to do the work for an amount not to exceed $1.6 million, which is $100,000 below bid received. If not successful in getting an on-site contractor to do the work, will re-advertise for bids. v Director Wahner asked if the contract could be broken down into individual separate projects? He was told we could do that if we don't get any bids. -2- Hart asked if we would be speaking to more than one contractor and was told yes. Tom added that we have all permits from the City of Fountain Valley and CALTRANS for the new entrance. MOVED, SECONDED 8 DULY CARRIED to approve Resolution No. 88-128, authorizing negotiation. Ursula Kennedy voted in opposition to the motion. Felt this should be rebid. 813 - CLOSED SESSION Convened in closed session at 8:13 p.m. Reconvend in regular session at 8:23 p.m. It was MOVED and SECONDED to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief, Case No. 566658, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 501, AFL-CIO vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, and authorize the General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. MOTION CARRIED. N14(a) - SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEM The General Counsel reviewed his Memorandum included with the Supplemental Agenda in the Directors' folders. He advised that part of the construction project for the Administration Building Addition included landscaping. The contractor gave us notice one week ago of his intent to substitute the landscape contractor because he would not sign a subcontract to do the work. The General Counsel 's office served notice on the subcontractor of the request to subcontract him and Mr. Woodruff was advised that the subcontractor was objecting. Don't know true facts at this point. Under proper procedures, the Districts are required to convene a hearing and that is why this matter has been submitted to the Board. The order of business is to accept a supplemental agenda item for consideration first in as much as it was not posted 72 hours prior to the meeting. The landscape work is to start within one week so couldn't delay this until the October Board meeting. MOVED 8 SECONDED to consider item. CARRIED by unanimous ballot. MOVED, SECONDED 8 DULY CARRIED to approve supplemental agenda item. k27(a) - DISTRICTS 2, 7 8 13 - Staff report re proposed Ordinances The General Manager recalled that staff had advised Districts 2 6 7 during the budget process that sometime during the first quarter of the fiscal year, staff would be recommending that they adjust their connection fee schedule. He also reminded District 13 Directors that when they revised their connection fees for Zones B and C last June, they were advised that when Districts 2 8 7 adjusted their fee schedules, it would be appropriate for District 13 to concurrently revise their Zone A fee. Zane A is property in District 13 that was transferred from Districts 2 and 7 when District 13 was formed and that is why the connection fee has remained consistent with Districts 2 a 7. Connection fees are paid by new development and are the primary source of capital funds for the Districts. We have received considerable federal and state grant funds in the past for advanced treatment facilities but that program has been killed by Congress. -3- District 2 issued debt certificates two years ago to partially fund some of its capital needs. Prior to Proposition 13, a major portion of the ad valorem tax levy went for ... capital improvements. However, the full ad valorem tax levy must now be allocated for annual operations and maintenance costs. In some Districts even that is inadequate and supplemental user fees have been necessary. District 2 will find it necessary to initiate supplemental user fees for financing operation and maintenance costs beginning in July 1989 and staff will be presenting an implementation plan to them later this fiscal year. It appears that District 7 will not have to consider user fees until the early 1990's. District 13 funds its 0 a M costs totally from user fees as they do not receive any portion of the ad valorem tax levy. A little over a year ago we started systematically adjusting the connection fee schedules in the several Districts to reflect the current costs of providing sewerage system capacity. We started with those Districts that were in the poorest financial condition. Districts 2 and 7 are the last Districts to adjust their fees. Mr. Sylvester reported that included in the Directors' meeting material that night were separate staff reports for Districts 2, 7 and 13 recommending that the connection fees be increased to $1,500 for a single-family dwelling unit and $300 per 1,000 square feet for commercial/industrial space. This is consistent with the fee schedules in effect in the other Districts and basically, represents the cost of providing sewerage system capacity. The actions appearing on the agenda to implement the fee increase are the first reading of Ordinances for each of the three Districts. The second reading and final adoption is scheduled for the regular October 12th Joint Board Meeting. The effective date had tentatively been December 1, 1988. However, staff had received inquiries from some of the Directors regarding the December Ist date wondering if it would be a problem to delay the effective date until January 1, 1989. The earliest effective date possible would be November 12th, 30 days after adoption. Staff stated they had no problem in delaying it until January 1st. It will give more time for the respective City staffs to adopt their interim procedures for implementation of the fee changes. Joint Chairman Smith stated he thought they should consider the January 1st date. It was then MOVED, SECONDED and DULY CARRIED by each District to revise its respective ordinance to reflect an effective date of January 1, 1989. -4- 9-14-88 STRINGFELLOW SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY IN JULY WE REPORTED TO YOU THAT THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES AND THE EPA HAD ISSUED THEIR DRAFT REPORT ON THE PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE PLANS FOR A LONG-TERM CLEAN-UP OF STRINGFELLOW. DHS AND EPA HAVE ANNOUNCED A PUBLIC MEETING IN FOUNTAIN VALLEY ON SEPTEMBER 29TH TO REVIEW THE DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY AND # CLEAN-UP PLAN. INCLUDED IN YOUR MEETING FOLDERS TONIGHT IS A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE SEPTEMBER 29TH MEETING. STAFF IS COMPLETING ITS REVIEW OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY AND WE WILL BE MAILING A SUMMARY OF OUR ANALYSIS TO EACH DIRECTOR .IN THE NEXT FEW DAYS. ONCE YOU RECEIVE IT, IF YOU HAVE ANY OUESTIONS,. PLEASE BE SURE TO -: GIVE US. A::-CALL: . ILL 'i i h kc V7113188 GENERAL MANAGER' S REPORT RE STRINGFELLOW SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY ON JUNE 30TH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES AND THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) ISSUED THEIR DRAFT REPORT ON THE PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE PLANS FOR LONG-TERM CLEAN UP OF STRINGFELLOW. LAST FRIDAY STAFF RECEIVED A COPY OF THE REPORT. . . '�, COPIES OF THESE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AT THE MAIN `EdSeWILIBRARIES IN �A AHEIM, COSTA MESA, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, HUNTINGTON BEACH, ORANGE AND SANTA ANA. DOHS AND EPA ARE PLANNING TO CONDUCT PUBLIC MEETINGS IN SEPTEMBER TO DISCUSS THE POTENTIAL CLEAN UP ALTERNATIVES. THE PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT PERIOD FOR THE REPORT RUNS THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30. AFTER . THE PUBLIC COMMENTARY PERIOD ENDS, A FINAL PLAN FOR THE STRINGFELLOW SITE CLEAN UP WILL BE ISSUED. ALTHOUGH WE HAVE NOT YET HAD TIME TO REVIEW IT, WE CAN REPORT THAT THE ALTERNATIVES INCLUDE SIX COMBINATIONS OF VARIOUS REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES THAT INCLUDE ONSITE FLUSHING, ONSITE ❑EWATERING, EXTRACTION OF CONTAMINATED LEACHATE, DOWN-CANYON CONTAMINATED PLUME MANAGEMENT AND ONSITE SOIL EXCAVATION AND TREATMENT. TOTAL COST FOR THE REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES RANGE FROM $36 MILLION TO $580 MILLION. - BECAUSE ^ " FOR CLEAN UP OF THE SITE RANGE= FROM SEVERAL DECADES. TO SEVERAL HUNDRED YEARS,` THE PRESENT WORTH .OF THE ALTERNATIlVES�, RANGE FROM $130 MILLION TO _ $710 MILLION. SEVERAL OF THE ALTERNATIVES INCLUDE, AS A PORTION OF THE WORK, THE EXTRACTION AND TREATMENT OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER SIMILAR TO WHAT IS HAQ4h64iFl@cSQaltlEs ' . I- r i e 'o"'r THE IMPLICATION OF THIS, OF COURSE, IS THAT A POTW, AND THEY PROBABLY HAVE THE SANITATION DISTRICTS IN MIND, WOULD RECEIVE TREATED GROUNDWATER EXTRACTED FROM THE STRINGFELLOW SITE FOR SEVERAL DECADES. AS .SOON AS WE HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW THE REPORT WE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH A SUMMARY OF OUR ANALYSIS. - 9-14-88 CONNECTION FEE REVISIONS DISTRICTS 2, 7 AND 13 DIRECTORS IN DISTRICTS 2 AND 7 WILL RECALL THAT DURING THE BUDGET PROCESS WE ADVISED YOU THAT SOME TIME DURING THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE FISCAL YEAR, WE WOULD BE RECOMMENDING THAT YOU ADJUST YOUR CONNECTION FEE SCHEDULE. DIRECTORS IN DISTRICT 13 WILLREMEMBER THAT WHEN YOU REVISED YOUR THATEWHENNDISTRICTS 2OAND 7 ADJUSTEDSTH IREfEEESCHEDULESYOIT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR DISTRICT 13 TO CONCURRENTLY REVISE THE ZONE A FEE IN DISTRICT 13. ZONE A IS PROPERTY IN DISTRICT 13 THAT WAS TRANSFERRED FROM DISTRICTS 2 AND 7 WHEN DISTRICT 13 WAS FORMED AND THAT' S WHY THE CONNECTION FEE HAS REMAINED CONSISTENT WITH DISTRICTS 2 AND 7. CONNECTION FEES ARE PAID BY NEW DEVELOPMENT FOR SEWERAGE SYSTEM CAPACITY TO SERVE THAT DEVELOPMENT AND ARE THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF CAPITAL FUNDS FOR THE DISTRICTS. WE HAVE RECEIVED CONSIDERABLE FEDERAL AND STATE GRANT FUNDS IN THE PAST FOR ADVANCED TREATMENT FACILITIES BUT, AS YOU KNOW, THAT PROGRAM HAS BEEN KILLED BY CONGRESS. DISTRICT 2 ISSUED DEBT CERTIFICATES TWO YEARS AGO TO PARTIALLY FUND SOME OF ITS CAPITAL NEEDS. PRIOR TO PROPOSITION 13, A MAJOR PORTION OF THE AD VALOREM TAX LEVY WENT FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THE FULL AD VALOREM TAX LEVY MUST NOW BE ALLOCATED FOR _ANNUAL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COSTS. AND ;tN SOME DISTRICTS, EVEN THA ,4. INADEQUATE AND SUPPLEMENTAL USER FEES' HAVE BEEN NECESSARY. DISTRICT 2 WILL FIND IT NECESSARY TO INITIATE SUPPLEMENTAL USER FEES FOR FINANCING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS BEGINNING IN JULY 19 1989 AND WE WILL BE PRESENTING AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO YOU LATER THIS FISCAL YEAR. DISTRICT 7, IT APPEARS, WILL NOT HAVE TO CONSIDER USER FEES UNTIL THE EARLY 1990'S. DISTRICT 13 FUNDS ITS' 08M COSTS TOTALLY FROM USER FEES AS THEY DO NOT RECEIVE ANY PORTION OF THE AD VALOREM TAX LEVY. A LITTLE OVER A YEAR AGO WE STARTED SYSTEMATICALLY ADJUSTING THE THENCURRENTFCOSTSHOFUPROVIDINGESEWERAGE DISTRICTS TO WE STARTI'D WITH THOSE DISTRICTS THAT WERE IN THE POOREST FINANCIAL CONDITION. DISTRICTS 2 AND 7 ARE THE LAST DISTRICTS TO ADJUST THEIR FEES. INCLUDED IN YOU AGENDA MATERIAL TONIGHT ARE SEPARATE STAFF REPORTS FOR DISTRICTS 2 7 AND 13 RECOMMENDING THAT THE CONNECTION FEES BE INCREASED TO $1500 FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY- DWELLING UNIT AND $300 PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL SPACE. THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FEE SCHEDULES IN EFFECT IN THE OTHER DISTRICTS AND BASICALLY REPRESENTS THE COST OF PROVIDING SEWERAGE SYSTEM CAPACITY. THE ACTIONS APPEARING ON YOUR AGENDA TO IMPLEMENT THE FEE INCREASES IS THE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE FOR EACH OF THE THREE DISTRICTS. THE SECOND READING AND FINAL ADOPTION IS SCHEDULED FOR THE REGULAR OCTOBER 12TH JOINT BOARD MEETING. THE NEW FEE SCHEDULES WOULD GO INTO EFFECT DECEMBER 1ST. STAFF WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE RECOMMENDATION. L.i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 61 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 �pl2AT10N „i wovoW=a p 'pt O al Sfea. 195 GRgNGE COLS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on September 14, 1988, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and �...� invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank x Dan Griset, Chairman pro tam —Dan Young -7--Ronald B. Hoesterey —Richard B. Edgar 7--Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: a A.B. -Buck- Catlin, Chairman Chris Herby -7--William D. Mahoney, Chairman pro tam —James H. Flora —Ben Bay —Iry Pickler Roland E. Bigonger =Todd Murphy =Dan Griset —Oan Young Gene A. Layton x Carrey Nelson =James Neal George Scott a Arthur G. Newton —John 0. Tynes x Bob Perry —Noonan Culver z Wayne Silzel _James T..Fasbender EDon E. Smith Jess Perez Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman Larry Herman x Sal Sapien, Chai man pro tam —Martha Weishaupt =Margaret M. Arnold —William Davis =Ben Bay —Iry Pickler 7--A.B. "Buck" Catlin Chris Herby z Noonan Culver —Bob Perry John Erskine =Grace Winchell =Don R. Griffin —Rhonda J. McCune =Dan Griset —Dan Young =William D. Mahoney James H. Flora =James Neal —George Scott =Carrey Nelson —John H. Sutton x J.R. "Bob" Siefen —Dewey Wiles =Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth x Charles Sylvia —Robert Wahistrm =_Edna Wilson —_Joe Hunt DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman John C. Cox, Jr. x John C. Cox, Jr.. Chairman pro tem —Ruthelyn Plummer Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT 90. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman Eric Johnson =Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tem —Ruthelyn Plummer =Dan R. Roth =Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Richard Edgar, Chairman _Ursula Kennedy a Sally Anne Miller, Chairman pro tam _Larry Agran =John C. Cox, Jr. —Dan Plummer =Dan Griset Dan Young =Don R. Roth --Roger Stanton =Don E. Smith Jess Perez z James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tom Mays, Chai man Peter Green John Erskine, Chairman pro tern =Grace Winchell =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Todd Murphy, Chairman _Roland E. Bigonger =Ben Bay, Chairman pro in Iry Pickler =Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton =Don E. Smith _Jess Perez x John Sutton Carrey Nelson DISTRICT MD. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller xUrsula Kennedy, Chai man pro tam Richard B. Edgar a Sally Anne Miller _Larry Agran =Don R. Roth, Chairman pro tam _Roger Stanton =Don E. Smith Jess Perez -2 09/14/88 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brawn, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary Streed, Penny Kyle, Corrine Clawson, John Linder, Bob Ooten, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark Ide, Jamel Demir, Conrad Hohener, Mel Kodmur, Steve Hough, Gary Robbins Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported on the Report of the Joint Chairman California Association of Sanitation Agencies' (CASA) Annual Work Conference held in Monterey in August. In addition to talks by Darlene Ruiz of the State Water Resources Control Board and John Wise, Deputy Administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency, the program included an interesting discussion on water conservation. He noted that the Districts' staff also conducted a session on ocean monitoring, including a review of marine life around the Districts' ocean outfall. Chairman Smith also commented on the very informative presentations on potential liability of public agencies regarding employer-employee issues, Proposition S5, sludge disposal , biamonitoring for effluent toxicity and air quality issues affecting Publicly Owned Treatment Works. - The Joint Chairman then reported on a recent meeting with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) which he attended along with Chairman Richard Edgar, Hank Wedaa of the SCAQMD Board, and high level staff members from both agencies. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the impact of emerging air quality regulations on the ability of sewerage agencies to meet water quality standards and to determine how both agencies might carry out their respective environmental missions without getting in each other's way. Chairman Smith noted that the meeting was very positive and productive. The two agencies agreed to continue meeting on a regular basis in an attempt to arrive at a mutual understanding on how to best achieve both water quality and air quality standards. Chairman Edgar added that the Sanitation Districts were committed to protecting the environment and serving the citizens of Orange County. He stressed that the environmental goals and regulations must be based upon solid technical information. Chairman Smith then noted that the SCAQMD permit to construct the Districts' proposed $53 million central power generating facilities was expected to be forthcoming in the near future. The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, September 28th, at 5:30 p.m., and invited Directors William Mahoney and Philip Maurer to attend and participate in the discussions. -3- 09/14/88 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager recalled, as Report of the General Manager previously reported to the Board in July, that the California Department of Health Services (DOHS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had issued a six-volume draft report on proposed long-term cleanup measures for the Stringfellow Waste Disposal site in Glen Avon. DOHS and EPA have announced a public meeting to be held in Fountain Valley on September 29th to review the draft feasibility study and cleanup plan. Mr. Sylvester advised that staff is completing its review of the report and expected to mail a summary of their analysis to the Directors in the near future. Staff will attend the Fountain Valley meeting and will offer oral and written comments. DOHS and EPA will issue a final report and plan after the public commentary period ends on the proposed long-term cleanup alternative that is selected. The General Manager then reported on the status of the Districts' "Action Plan for Environmental Management: Preserving Orange County' s Coastal Ocean Waters" which was approved by the Board one year ago. It is the most comprehensive study ever undertaken in the nation by a POTW and will produce the information needed for the Boards to make a well-studied decision on the Districts' application to the Environmental Protection Agency and California Regional Water Quality Control Board for renewal of the ocean discharge permit in 1990. The Action Plan, which encompasses a 30-year period, will evaluate engineering, environmental , financial and social aspects of the appropriate wastewater management program for protecting public health and the environment. An important aspect of the plan is the Community Outreach/Public Information Program to inform the public about the Districts' wastewater management plans and gain their support for the program. Mr. Sylvester noted that a series of workshops are currently being conducted. A video presentation produced for the public workshops was then shown to the Board members. Copies of Action Plan brochures and fact sheets used in the workshops were also distributed to the Directors. In response to the Directors' expressed desire to have the video presentation made available to any group with an interest in the Districts' program, staff indicated that part of the Community Outreach Program was to make the video presentation available to community interest and service groups, professional groups and other local governmental agencies. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. . DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 09/14/88 DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments pproval of minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1988, the 'Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. v DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10. 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments pproval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments . Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of M nu es to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1988, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of a ent of Joint anindividualDis r c a ms That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A", "B" and "C" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so Indicated. 8/03/88 8/17/88 8/31/88 ALL DISTRICTS Joining Fund - $1,020,077.01 $ 379,367.70 $ 1,371,844.19 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 4,682,233.17 411,144.80 5,060,952.39 Joint Working Capital Fund - 114,858.01 109,059.72 602,983.62 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - -0- 6,017.22 60,738.31 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 29.93 34.88 547.80 DISTR N . - 1,538,636.34 5,831.25 166,500.96 DI TRH IT - 219,574.13 123,358.45 324,752.48 DIS I T N . 5 - 6,166.37 12,319.85 32,125.26 DISTRICT NO. 9 - 5,351.90 7.65 339.45 DIDI TRIG 36,648.17 14,860.08 12,872.74 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 275,810.70 6,264.20 239,861.61 DI IRIS—�. 13 - -0- -0- -0- I RIUff TT NO.14 - -0- 23.07 12,000,114.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 51,875.58 548,886.20 445,161.64 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 7,674.44 -0- 1,388.68 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOI T - 3 472.46 160.00 3,181.11 - 7, .408.21 1,617,3 7 20,323,364.24 -5- 09/14/88 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin an a rder No. 1 to the tans and Spec f ca ons re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. J-7-4 .specifications for Administration `✓ Building Addition, Jab No. J-7-4, authorizing a net addition of $16,444.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for modification of fire protection water line, additional utility sleeves and Plant 1 directional signs, additional costs due to scheduling change re construction of west parking lot and substitution of materials to be used for an exterior fire stairway, and granting a time extension of 15 calendar days for completion of the additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chan a Order No. 9 to the Tans and specifications re That Change Order No. 9 to the plans and Job NOS. P1-2 and P1- 1 specifications for Headworks No. 2 at • Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts, and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of $204,594.00 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for modifications of precast pile required due to subsurface soil conditions encountered and for costs due to delay to contractor during manufacture of said precast piles; for undisclosed utilities; equipment materials and site modifications; and other modifications and miscellaneous items; and granting a time extension of 17 calendar days for said delays and additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin lams and s ec ca ons re o o. P2-37 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 88-125, approving plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rov n Addendum No. 1 to the Professiona ery ces A reement That the Boards of Directors hereby with Janes 8 Stokes Associates adopt Resolution No. 88-126, approving Inc. for re aratian of IR for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional astewater rea men an s osal Services Agreement with Jones & Stokes Element of Master Plan Programmatic Associates, Inc. for preparation of an EIR Environmental Impact Report for the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Element of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Programmatic EIR, deleting the marine subconsultant services of Kinnetics Laboratories, Inc. and substituting Jones & Stokes' personnel for said work, at no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $213,126.00. Acertified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Au horiz12 renewal Of membe rshi in the Santa Ana River F ao That renewal of membership in the Santa Protection Agency SAR PA Ana River Flood Protection Agency (5ARFPA) for fiscal year 1988-89, be, and is hereby, authorized; and, �.d FURTHER MOVED: That payment of annual membership dues in the amount of $1,400.00, be, and is hereby,. authorized. -6- os71ai88 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with the Hun tin On Beach Wet lands That the Boards of Directors hereby Conservancy, at at. re Huntington adopt Resolution No. 88-127, approving Beach wetlands Restoration Plan Agreement with the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy, et al., providing for the implementation of the Huntington Beach Wetlands Restoration Plan, the improvement of Orange County Flood Control District facilities at the Santa Ana River and Talbert Valley Channels, and the transfer of a Grant of Easement for conservation purposes by Sanitation Districts to the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy with a reservation to Districts of rights to construct and maintain necessary wastewater treatment and support facilities at Plant No. 2. A certified ' copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re ro osed contract for Entrances a Security and Interior Road improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. PS- 7 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that a single bid for $1.78 million had been received for Job No. P1-27, Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1. The Engineer's estimate for this project was $1.5 million. After speculating on the reasons other contractors were reluctant to bid on the job, he recommended that staff be authorized to negotiate with on-site contractors to do the work for an amount not to exceed $1.6 million for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. He noted that if unable to successfully negotiate a contract for this amount, staff would rebid the job. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: tad s ecifications re Jonsb No.an PS- 7 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, providing for minor modifications, additions and deletions to coordinate the work with ongoing and upcoming construction projects, be, and is hereby approved. Rejecting the sale bid received re Moved, seconded and duly carried: Job Na. P -27 an au horizin2 staf to negotiate a contract for said That the Boards of Directors hereby work adopt Resolution No. 88-128, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation; rejecting the sole bid received for Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27; determining that the work can be completed at a lesser price by negotiation in the open market; and authorizing staff to negotiate a contract with a qualified contractor in an amount not to exceed $1,600,000.00, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. - Director Ursula E. Kennedy requested that her vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. -7- 09/14/88 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: `...� Receive file and approve written report of the Select committee to That the written report of the meeting Advise t e Staff of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff held on August 31, 1988, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS The Boards convened in closed session at Convene n close session pursuant 8:13 p.m, pursuant to Government Cade to overnment Code Section 54956.9. Sect on 54956.9 ALL DISTRICTS At 8:23 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular sess on regular session. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damages and That the Summons and Complaint for injunctive Relief, case NO. bbbbtld Damages and Injunctive Relief, Case No, 566658, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 501, AFL-CIO vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re proposed substitution of langsca a subcontractor on Administration Building Addition Job No. J-7-4 Report of the General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel reported that J. R. Roberts Corporation, contractor for construction of the Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, in a letter dated August 12, 1988, advised the Districts of his intent to substitute the named subcontractor for the landscape portion of theproject (New West Landscape Construction) because said subcontractor refused to execute a subcontract. The General Counsel 's office served notice on the subcontractor of the contractor's request and, subsequently, on September 14, 1988, learned that the subcontractor objected to this substitution. Mr. Woodruff advised that in accordance with Section 4107 of the California Public Contracts-Cade, it was appropriate for the Boards to delegate to the General Manager, or his designee, the authority to act as hearing officer and make a final non-appealable decision on the request of J. R. Roberts to substitute for said subcontractor. He noted that because the landscape work is scheduled to start within a week or so, the matter could not be delayed until the regular October Board meeting. . The General Counsel further pointed out that because the Supplemental Agenda Item was unable to be posted 72 hours prior to the meeting, the Board must vote on whether the matter should be considered prior to actually voting on `..� the reconmended action. He noted that because the need to take action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted, the decision by the Board to consider this matter must be approved by a two-thirds vote of those present. -8- 09/14/88 Authorizin consideration of Moved, seconded and unanimously Su lememo A enda-i em re carried: subs u on of landscape Subcontractor on Job No. J-7-4 That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a Supplemental Agenda item re proposed substitution of the landscape subcontractor on Administration Building Addition, Jab No. J-7-4, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the need to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager or his desi nee to act as hearin That the General Manager or his officer and to make a f na non- designee be, and is hereby, A ealable decis re ues authorized to act as hearing officer o Obe ionr s o on the r ora on and to make a final non-appealable contractor for Job No. -7-4 to decision on the request of subsEltute tne su con rac or for J. R. Roberts Corporation, landscape portion of said job contractor for Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, to substitute the named subcontractor for the landscape portion of said job (New West Landscape Construction) , in accordance with Section 4107 of the California Public Contracts Code. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ad ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m. , September 14, 1988. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ADDrovinq Chanqe Order No. 3 to the Tans and s ecif cations re That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and contract NO. J-ZBR-1 specifications for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-2811-1, authorizing an addition of $26,500.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co. pursuant to contract provisions for payment of bonus for early completion of specified manholes, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awardinq Contract No. - 4R to Mladen Buntich Lonstruction Go. That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 88-131-3, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Manhole Adjustments and Street Repairs on Knott Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-34R, to Mladen Buntich Construction Co. in the total amount of $369,010.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., September 14, 1988. _ -9- 09/14/88 DISTRICTS 5 8 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifidations re contract No. 5- 1 That the Boards of Directors hereby v adopt Resolution No. 88-132, approving plans and specifications for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Adden um No. 1 to a That the Selection Committee be, and is - Professional ery ces ent hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum with Robert Bein, illA regim iam Frost No. 1 to the Professional Services Associates re design of Contract Agreement with Robert Bein, William Nos. 5-33 an -34 Frost 8 Associates for design of Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, and Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-34, to provide for various modifications and additional services required relative to the Bay Bridge Pump Station. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., September 14, 1988. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., September 14, 1988. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authoriz n the General Manager to -execute the 0lscla mer of Defendent That the General Manager be, and is re Superior Court Case No. 498713, hereby, authorized to execute the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Disclaimer of Defendent County Huntin ton Beach vs. Hun in ton Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange Beach Company, et a County, California, to Complaint in Eminent Domain, relative to Superior Court Case No. 498713, Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach vs. Huntington Beach Company, et al . DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., September 14, 1988. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., September 14, 1988. -10- 09/14/88 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates That the Selection Committee Tor design and construction certification of the final negotiated services re Contract No. 2-26-3 and fee relative to the Professional �J Contract No. 2-28 Services Agreement with Willdan Associates for design and construction services required for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3, and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No.. 88-129-2, approving said Professional Services Agreement for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $112,746.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Actions re agreements with the Orange Redevelopment Agency for a partial pass-through of a portion of the property tax increment re Amendment No. 1 to the Tustin _ Street Redevelopment Plan, Amendment No. 2 to the Southwest Redevelopment Plan and the - Northwest Redevelopment Plan Receive and file letter from the Moved, seconded and duly carried: City of Orange That the letter from the City of Orange dated July 29, 1988, proposing said pass-through be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Approving Agreements with the Moved, seconded and duly carried: Orange Redevelopment Agency That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 88-130-2, approving Agreements with the Orange Redevelopment Agency providing for a partial pass-through of that portion of the property tax increment resulting from application of the District No. 2 historical share of the property tax roll for Amendment No. 1 to the Tustin Street Redevelopment Plan, Amendment No. 2 to the Southwest Redevelopment Plan and for the Northwest Redevelopment Plan. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 7 & 13 Actions re proposed Ordinances amending Ordinances Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities Verbal staff report and discussion The General Manager recalled that during the recent 1988-89 budget proceedings staff had advised District 2 and District 7 Directors _ that they would be recommending adjustments to their connection fee schedules sometime during the first quarter of the fiscal year. -11- 09/14/88 He also noted that when District 13 revised their connection fees for Zones B and C last June, staff advised that when Districts 2 and 7 adjusted their fee schedules, it would be appropriate for District 13 to concurrently `....� revise its Zone A fee. Zone A consists of property that was transferred from Districts 2 and 7 when District No. 13 was formed and that is the reason for establishing a Zone A connection fee consistent with the fees in Districts 2 and 7. Mr. Sylvester noted that connection fees are paid by new development and are the primary source of capital funds for the Districts. Because the Districts no longer receive federal and state grant funds for advanced treatment facilities, as that program has been eliminated by Congress, the Districts are finding it necessary to implement various other methods to finance their long-term capital needs, such as the issuance of debt certificates and implementation of supplemental user fees. He noted that prior to Proposition 13 a major portion of the ad valorem tax levy went for capital improvements. However, the full ad valorem tax levy must now be allocated for annual operations and maintenance costs. The General Manager indicated that the proposed ordinances for Districts Nos. 2, 7 and 13 were consistent with the.fee schedules in effect in the other Districts and basically represented the cost of providing sewerage system capacity. Mr. Sylvester referred the Board Members to staff reports Included in the agenda material recommending the following connection fee schedule for consideration by the Directors: Single/Multi-Family Commercial/Industrial/ Dwelling Units Governmental/Other $1,500 per dwelling $300 per 1,000 sq: ft. Mr. Sylvester advised that the draft ordinances included with the agenda material provided for a tentative effective date of December 1, 1988. He noted, however, that it had been suggested that the effective date be delayed until January 1, 1989. This would allow the cities who collect the fees on behalf of the Districts more time to make the necessary changes to their procedures. Staff indicated that they did not foresee any problems in delaying the effective date until January 1st. After a brief discussion, it was the consensus of the Directors that January 1, 1989 be established as the effective date of each of the proposed ordinances for Districts Nos. 2, 7 and 13. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinances Nos. 207, 721 and 1304 be revised to reflect an effective date of January 1, 1989. DISTRICT 2 Actions re proposed Ordinance o. 257 Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated August 23, 1988 re District's proposed `..: connection fee program for capital financing be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -12- 09/14/88 First Readln of revised Moved, seconded and duly carried: rd nonce No. 2 7 That revised Ordinance No. 207, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, l.,l Amending Ordinance No. 205 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of revised Ordinance No. 207 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That revised Ordinance No. 207, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 205 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be introduced and passed to second reading on October 12, 1988, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 7 Actions re proposed Ordinance No. 721 Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated August 30, 1988 re District's proposed connection fee program for capital financing be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. . First Reading of revised Ordinance Moved, seconded and duly carried: No. 721 That revised Ordinance No. 721, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 718 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 720, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in Its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of revised Ordinance No. 721 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That revised Ordinance No. 721, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 718 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 720, be introduced and passed to second reading on October 12, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. 13- 09/14/88 DISTRICT 13 ctions re proposed ordinance o. 1304 Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly tarried: That the Staff Report dated September 6, 1988 re District's proposed connection fee program for capital financing be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. First Reading of revised Ordinance Moved, seconded and duly tarried: 13 o. That revised Ordinance No. 1304, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1301 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1302, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of revised Ordinance No. 1304 by title only, It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That revised Ordinance No. 1304, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1301 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1302, be introduced and passed to second reading on October 12, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjourment That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:35 p.m., September 14, 1988. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:35 p.m., September 14, 1988. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation and authorizing That the petition from Hugh M. Griffin initiation of proceedings re and Lesson F. Pomeroy III, requesting ro osed Annexation No. 127 - annexation of .96 acres of territory to Gr fin-Pomeroy Annexation the District in the vi tint ty south of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated County territory, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 88-134-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation No. 127 - Griffin-Pomeroy Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -14- 09/14/88 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly, carried: Aoorovino Reimbursement A reemen witn Darlene J. F e ds d a That the Board of Directors hereby D. & Associates, re sewer line adopts Resolution No. 88-133-7, n circula Panorama btreet approving Reimbursement Agreement with Darlene J. Fields, dba D. J. & Associates, the developer that constructed a sewer line in Circula Panorama Street which will serve 23 lots located within Tract No. 939, providing for reimbursement of costs to developer, to be collected from the remaining 14 properties connecting to said sewer based on $3,778.83 per lot. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:35 p.m. , September 14, 1988. Secretary, Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 -15- � FUND so 9190 •- JT DISH WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/25/5E PACE 1 ._ REPOPT NUPSEA AP63 -__S4VyIZ=.0..417R.i1FY._4I3 ' CLAIMS PAID 10/03/09 . WARRANT 40. _ vEyQ� . .__ AMOUNT nrSra aS..nN 09OC92 ARA CLEAN 3196.22 CLEANING SUPPLIES A24 i92.__. ACC.QPEpE..fY-E fl.v .. ..... .�..- L9.12 d1 DRAPERY CtWIND__ _ 09609E ACTION INSTRUMENTS. INC. $532.56 TRANSMITTER 096095 ADARSON INDUSTRIES. INC. 1547.91 S"M LIGHTS _ 09909E __2oYA�11iF_S.Dr$TILN4I4P.if. INC... 199097 ATE COLD SUPPLY IP.C. S125.6P ELECTRONIC PARTS 09•09F ALFAAAVAL. INC. 52.791.1E MECHANICAL PANS i16d99 _.�J.41ED.549E_EflAI13K ._ ... _ SI RRST3_Tn CATTONTC POLYMER N.0. 1-I1-97 094160 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. - 11.334.83 CHLLORINATION PARTS 094101 ALL FORE CHEMICAL $55.622.30 CHLORINE M.O. 10-1"7 6990i -999,219.51. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 2-16 094103 ANAHEIM SEVER CONSTRUCTION 19/3.JC WASTEWATER SAMPLE 094104 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. $2.291.83 HARDWARE C9/100._._ ._tc-DAME 1 PILLIMP So¢P _ Eiid.0 VAlves 094106 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 92.713.82 PERSONNEL ADS 's C94107 AFFIX ONE 5357.36 TEMPORARY SERVICES Im ' ,., 09910E .-.-.AQUATIC CENTER ._. S9Ef.D11 Al. SARI[ RYPILLR J94IJ9 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 1610.T0 INSTRUMENT PARTS 09611, LSPOCIATEC LABOPATOFIES S299.LL LAB SERVICES __.s6U _._-- EI.ELIFIC-__ . _. _ ...____$49L_Rl REFUND L SUPPLIES 0/9113 AWNING ICE CLUB OF SO.CALIF. f191.77 TRAILER USSR Y¢e OV¢RPAYMAI2 !� m 099113 AWNING MASTERS f602.47 TRAILER PART _FAL40y�ISP.OSIL._SEP VICE �26N8Bi.l1- r.RTT ReHOVAM. x.0. lo-x9-a6 2 09.115 P.6A EAROTTI AND ASSOC, 59.750.10 COKSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-26.F1-06.P2-33634 094116 B. MATENAN 5565.1C DEFERRED COHE DISTRIBUTION UO L993t7__A'_LTCP "ILJS.CA%fL_0FF... . .. .. . ..... -__ rN••_.:1 vvmx,N Nsvx1P ova L9.119 BARTEP SCIENTIFIC FRODUCTS $766.21 LAB SUPPLIES .9U 19 PE ACON BAY ENTERFPISF.S. INC. $62.30 CAR WASH SERVICES _ 19P 120 _ _..SEN; ENOI NEER ING. IY.C. __- ___._723.66_ -._ MvcxAxIC6L PARTS T` S9U.1 EOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $752.64 RADIATOR REPAIR 1194122 BON-A-RUES f55.6L TRUCK PARTS :. J99I2• .__._,QW;I' ._ _. _._. .._ `S1N3.2• ReOuxD user PeE ovCRP6Y1mIT- -- 096I2R GROWN t CALDWELL --- _ 6625.3L LAG SERVICES • 494325 EAGAN S CALDWELL CONSULTING 523.997.26 EECINEERINC SERVICES RES 88-57 ._. 099I_26 .,_._POILQIM O_MEYH. IMP. i99127 TnE SOMME COMPANY 1191.51 MARDWARE 19.12E CAST G. 9TREED 9613.25 PEETY CASB 16110URS01E1T7 S96 g; DOHN Ely .....__32JB.7..61.-- NeLxu1+EPAl3d T8_s -- --'19613C--- CAL-GLASS FOP RESEARCH. INC. $2,594.06 LAS SUPPLIES - -R • 894131 CALLY CURTIS CO. $65.72 PUBLICATION UROLl0-807LE,l A..40147 VE.NTUPE ..- _ _,__G712A1]1.31_._ mOLN[I I�NO SEny;s$S_BNB .fli1)l. N 69913.' CENTURY SAFETY INST. t SUFP. $922.56 SAP¢tt SUPPLIES 694334 CENTWT WHEEL t RIM $336.39 VEHICLE PASTS 694139_ _.[M iMVE3,L[xt. _. _. .. ._ . _. it.39.E1._ CHpju0L,7s ____..__ .....____ 69113A CNEMVEST INDUSTRIES. INC. $130.413.71 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O. 11-18-87 C9613T CHEYPON O.S.A.. INC. S3.676.92 PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FUND 40 9199 - JT LIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING OATS 7/29/80 PAGE . REPORT HUM9EP AP43 J'.OUNTt-E E T2T@•L1<r5 v rs nF noexor rm xrr _._ CLAIMS PAID 13/.i3/68 ai WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT nrzrPsOn nx �a� a94136 C1IRISTEVE CORP. _ S275.495.15 COMSTRUCRON 11-L6, 11-I0-3R a 694139 CLAAK_�OMSULTAMJ�C it a TIXG LAL C�RON 094140 CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS. INC. $54.73 SAPE7f[ SUPPLIES 094141 COAST AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION $613.95 AUTOMOTIVE must 394142__ CONSOL146IEL-j1CcSDiL6LD.LSI.._.— _.._.---- 56. 32.Lr ®.Ecr3xuL a"Itia 494143 CONTINENTAL CPEMTCAL CO _ 55..60.64 CKLORIMC M.0.12-10-86 494140 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL S2.860.73 CRANK RENTAL 094105 _ COU' r SH OLESALE ELECTRIC rte a.lT eLeLTRIC SUPPLIES !�a' C 91146 CAL WATER --�--- 5121.00 RENTAL ¢QUIPlENT '4 094147 LARRY CURTI TRUCK 6 EQUIPMENT $21.700.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O. A-13-88 09414f.__ STATE OF CALIF. OEPT. OF GEE. - 094149 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE S4133.33 TIM 1194150 OECD 941.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLI05 ]94151 UIE TERICH - POSL�..D.M_._-. -- s-.7T IXSTRNRNT PASTS C94152 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES S199.28 PRINTING 094153 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. f345.a4 SERVICE AGREEMENT a" 094154 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYSTEMS. 1N[. TSAR.RP MRL'& cu PASTS fa i 094155 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. SB5.552.11 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS w 094156 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. S681.15 PAINT SUPPLIES .94157 .,ELI.A!•• INE_yTfQ W.b.. IMP.. _—_ S133.6t INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES -gym 09415E EIRCO PROCESS EQUIP. CO. SI.844.62 MECHANICAL SERVICES 094159 LASTMAN. INC. $1.253.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES _y ..x a9116J VLML(BERT CORP,-- — s45.]11.P0 EMPLOR11[[ION 5-29 a94162 JEFF ESOER 334.38 0RL0YE¢ NTLEAO¢ -"bq 094162 xARSMAIL FAIRRCS t]lJ.•IR CDRIFERREDONSTRUCTION CONK DISTRIBUTION J-7- -"'-' 494164 FARRSERVICE sT.F65.:± WNSTRICTIA SERVICES ]-0-6 ^DN. 994165 FEDE SALES L SERVICE S65.E0 MR PARS n I 094I65 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. S376.56 AIR RINIGNT b 91_ __ FIS CMER_L FOPTCR CQ.,. ._ s]]B41L_ CHLORINATION PAl'r3 •N 094161 FISHER VERTICAL C CO. S225.78 W SUPPLIES - 094169 FLAT f VERTICAL CONCRETE S222..1 CORE DRILLING - '9 094169 TLC-SYS TENS _ __________ S537.21 MRCHAKICAL PARTS 0901Ta ABLATE PUMPS. INC STD 6.21 PER PARTS -• 494171 FOOTHILL ENGINE L EQUIPMENT CO S27.60a.a6 YELL aRmin X.O. 6-18-88 _ 09.172 _ CITY OF FQNNTAIN VALLEY_ sl1.D•l].L. LAND PURCHASE M.0.7-I3-68 094173 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PA14T S695.04 PAINT SUPPLIES 394174 DOAALO L. FOX 6 ASS 3CIATFS S1.425.9. CONSULTING SERVICES 994175 THE FOXBORO CO. _____ ,. __16j1y3-j__- INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES C94176 SAGAMI. LUMBER CO. B1.a25.17 BUILDING SUPPLIES 09417T SATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS s114.0E FIBERGLASS REPAIR �» 5941_7B_ GEAAL TELEPHOIJE CO_ 52,al,,E7 TEL EPHONE '>A� - 694179 EN GEORGE LEECH A ASSOCIATES f1..36.80 ELECTRIC PART .194101 GOULD INC. S546.)G ELECTRICAL REPAIRS ]94181 --GREAT LAKES HYDRAULICS_ _ _ .._ _ _ f282�_ CONTROL PART _ 94182 GRINNELL CORPORATION $6.734.50 VALVPS +L i94183 FRED A. MARPEP S1.363.60 DRERM CONK DISTRIBUTION ,M iUNC� 419. - J7 CAST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/20/6f PAGE ` REPORT NUMBER AP43 _- -- _ COUNTY Sh!AILAi[LN=y(rgitT[ of CLUMP rouxav CLAIMS PAID '�61.:3/88 WARRANT NO. VEENOQg_._-_.,_.__ .__.—,—AMOUNT nrSruTPn nu 494184 MATCH B RINK. INC. $5.713.41 MECHANICAL PARTS 494185 —_. — 6 S. A. HEALY CO. S239.J60.67 CONSTRUCTION PI-23R ---- 094187 HOOPER CAMERA STORES 316.75 BATTERIES _ .9A Sfla 9.5. MUGHEj_0.. ,�,1{[y___.__ ...__ _ _ •L.69a.a9 LAO suPPLIPS 094189 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $16.51 WATER USEAGE - 194190 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP 5369.41 RUBBER STAMPS 694191 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY 115.64 HARDNAUE U 11 2 HURLEY ELECTRONICS, INC. ST22.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES • �� ... 9! ICC INSTRUMENT $61.29 HETER REPAIR 094194 INNACCOMPUTER BACKUP TAPE .94 IS5 INDEPENDENT EXPLORATION F216.T9 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 0941% INDEFEMDENT FORGE CO. $4.911.31 REFUND USER FEE OVERPASTPHT C94197 INDUSTR IAL CQ�_____ 091198 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 3395.34 FITTINGS .d 094199 INFILCO OEGREMONT. INC. $394,924.66 BAR SCREENS SPEC E-178 _ C94200 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY E :d G94261 RIVIERA FINANCE S312.83 JAMITORTAL SUPPLIES 0942C2 JONES 6 STOKES ASSOC..INC. $3.83S.16 CONSULTING SERVICES US 88-27 C94203 _ KAtk-KIENTIFiE._1NSTRQNW$,C0_._. _._ . ._ s631.9:. W SUPPLIES x G9� KAMAN BEARINGS 0 SUFVLY $135.67 PITTINGS I+a 2 094205 RAS SAFETY PRODUCTS S151.24 SAFETY SHOES ` -W 0 9A206 _ 1ULT. P EN _ 92C7 KING BEARING, INC. $4,183.I6 BPARINOS/MACHINE SUPPLIES C942:B uM OONALO E. KINNEY >tl09.O3 DEPERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ON SSRYjGn-L-jfi-L,5=jI-- a942:9 PRE NANO C NSULTING SCR..,_ .,-__--- 59.A1a.N• ' 'n u94211 LEE A NO CONSULTING CEEP.GR.0 633.519.00 ENGINEERING 58RVIC85 PI-33 ' - I 091212 LIFECON-SAi ETY SERVICE SUPPLY 3299.8C CYLINDER HEPAIHS _ ♦1 a9_212 Ms. il6 FILMPROT APNIt SERVICES + 091L 2 • YAlx PHOTO- - -- _. 11T5.49 09 FILM 09a219 M.ALCOLM PIRNIE . INC. 511.316.13 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-20 ..��:9V215 MATT - CHLOeE_INQy__,_,____ .,,__ __�1..1:6.1• CHLONjNATION 6mPLIES y - x9.r1M MCGAIN INSTRUMENTS $310.90 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 094217 MCGARRY CENTRAL TYPEWRITEP INC >1H13.40 SERVICE AGREEMENTS r• 094218 PEOLIN COMMONS CO. 1 SN619UN¢NT SUPPLIES ____-_.. _...__.__.__�2 ..2_ •• IR O MF54CONSOLIDATED WATER IS f6.1: WATER USEACE 19922E FICRG NOTION S266.67 FITTINGS -- 094221 MILLERS PRINTLFY______._.__ 1}$i.Aj__ PRIMING - 694-222 MINE SAFETY APFLIANCES CO. $1,862.42 SAFETY 494223 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO 1209.795.35 CONSTRUCTION 3-28R-I - - Y SUPPLIER a .J 094224 MORITZ FOUNDRY 091225 --MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC.--- $491.11 FITTING J94226 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES 467.CA MOBILE PHONES i99227 NATIONAL LUMBER N3+720--NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. _ S.25.:0 PLANT MAINTENACE 6 REPAIRS - 394229 REAL SUPPLY CO. $596.51 HARDWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/2R/98 PAGr o REPORT NURSER AP43 COUNTY 3lH.ILIICIL - CLAIMS PAID 38/03/83 WARRANT NO. d94231 NEELY t WALKER. INC. $62.41 AUTO REPAIR j 194231 M41 T[IL NOTE l lL{Dj& EyIy.9,l_ eO1iP -TAT I11 0Y232 O.M.S. f1.090.06 SYEARSAFETY 8!N N010VAL 5�I ' 091433 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES s199.86 SA911T GLASSES �>• 0942>lg_.-_-ORANGE_COUNTY FARM SU 9llP.P1L__..__._._-...__.__$77.34 .n NDSCAN nG SUP. I,v' 694236 ORANGE COUNTY fFIT SUPPLY CO/ 227.43 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES ' 09423E ORANGE VALVE s fITTING CO. f227.b3 LAD SUPPLIES I'+1 694238 OSCAR-COUNTY F ORANGEAF1____.._._.. .__.__-_ ••1 094239 COUNTY OF ORANGE f600.32 CONSULTING SE6v1G83 7-10 I,^ a 994J9 COUNTY OF ORANGE $6.600.32 SUPVCYIHG/MAPPING .9o41 COUORANT7_EANI FLOOD CONTROL _..__ 846say.25 CONSTRUCION\Tv .LAx2-B7 ymrnx �m 1 094242 ORANGE CO. FLOOD CONTROL DIST. fS4BND16.23 SENSE. x0.0 8-12-BI .' �.q C94243 PSG SEWER SERVICES. INC. f47.311.38 9EV¢fl CCN 09♦ 43 3 PACIFIC PAESIEIL•1DSs--_.-_.... - P• d94241 PACIFIC SAFETY $63.21 SAFETY S SUPPLIES 1' Y 9929E PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. i113.39 SAPeTY SUPPLIER lY 09121E PACIFIC SEVER XAINTENANL[ E.��__.,_�Z..'R-•2 R.xe. QIA.r.. 9.247 PACIFIC BELL $583.11 TELEPHONE 094246 PACTEL CELLULAR f60.36 TELEPHONE SERVICE 1 094249 PARTS EN LSbRINy sOMLNI _ 56.03._>9 xNCNAxICu. PANTR " n =�}{ 094251 PARTS UNLIMITED f1$435.00 DEFERRED PARTS >� 094251 ROY FCN OER60.1FT fO33.S0 EMGI.PRR COMP DISTRIBUTION 2-11_ IM _ 0944253.. __.._. PHOTO 9 SOUND OEAgj. _. .. �Bdeb.60 OFFICE MACH. NE VICV_RREPAIR z-11_a 094253 PHOTO t SOVND CO. f552.B0 OFFICE IMCxixR R¢PA[H 491251 PIC KYICN PAPER f72.08 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Lam, :94255 PINA GRq__SISIFN4A..lyCy 1 R?IMF RENEVA1.N.C. 5-11-88 v 014256 FOYER HOUSE FORD ENGINES s352.11 AVIOM%)YIVE PARTS "9 '9 $94257 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $60.00 ICE n � - 458 .92 . ._._._ THE PPROJECTS SOLUTION OLUTION _CO._. .... _... . ._____ _.-f_3.3.576320._R720 INSTRUMENTATION NST UMENTASION INSPECTION099260 PULSAFEEDER t991.11 PUMP, PARTS �. QUES CDATA SYSTEMSO.a_.._..._...-_ ____. ._ .3416.t2 TRAININGTR iv- 394263 GUEST DATA SISTERS. INC. f416.90 ENGINEER •" 094264 RAG ENGINEERING, INC. f9.400.00 ENCINERRINC SERVICES J-20 I,: 091264 _ RATTRAP A1�.,SSEOFil1ES.. 1GA._. .. . _. S13N.1.�- SLUDGE REMr AI. H.O.a .; 495265 --AEC WING INC. f6T$211.96 SLUDGE SEMOVAI M.0.2-10-88 C94267 RCA WINO SHIES 5211.85 SAFETY SN089 094267 ' M.A. RECO ELECTRIC.____,__ ___j I'A LA36__ P1.CTRnxrC yeFATRR d 94268 R�NEOT TEMP f1.456.83 TEMPORARY SERVICES 094269 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM 63.030.00 POSTAGE _Q94270 _ THE REPUBLIC. SUPPLY ., ,- __ ___ f3131.Se1R__ Rra•[rxc5 ''x 'J 91{11 NId MAR USI V17SGM�OPCYFU55 112.912.42 LEGAL SERVICES ' 494272 RICOH CORPORATION 11.320.4D COPIES ERASES 094273 ROBERT Y. RUNT CO. {L gf2.9 _ RIAATO¢S_ f321.63 REFUND USE& PRE OYEIIPAYMEN7 894275 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. 31,000.59 INSECTICIDE 0 .H /! FUND 0 9199 •- JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL FFOCESSING PATE 7/26/BP RAF! _ REPORT NUMBER AF43 COY(-7I 3_PI,ITATt,QN_EJSTPIf TS OF OPANFF COUNTY CLAIMS PAID CE)43/48 _ WARRANT NO__-.__ VE _....... A OUN.L-_ niscalo)mx 094276 RUSTIC INN f96.36 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 099277 0.YAM-NERCO _ 19T.)1 _ PW PARTS S91,Wie JOSEPn T. RTERSON OM L Sr INC. f514.26 STEEL 094279 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L 399.437.85 OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH M.O. 6-10-87 94280, _ _ SEA COAST DESIGNS ._ . _ _ ..._ 32L17 OFPICC_¢9ULFKEM Mi R 694281 SGCit SUFPLx - -- 3352.36 TOOLS 0992E2 SIERRA INDUSTRIES 38.453.5C - MECHANICAL PARTS 494263 _SNAE-ON TOOLS ORE. _ _ f939_19 TOOLS 494205 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEER. f593.00 NIL TeSTINO 094266 SOUTHERN CALIF. ECISON CO. 34 87r936.01 POWER :n •: 69MZB6 .. SO. CALIF. TRAME CDs..-_. __._._. 31.ia9_71 ELECCONSTRICAL N-POWERSUPPLIES CUS-011 491227 SOU SOUTHERN C ]RISE SERVICE f050.09 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 099'A0P SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $7 rT]A.49 DIESEL PULL _094224 -. ..-. SPARKLETTS_OR LNII ING WATER „ 31,457,5.9. WATER 09929E SPEEDE Sp EEDOMETER $332.69 DRIVES TESTING 094292 STAPOW STEEL 3199.16 METAL �v m 099292 STAR TOOL B UPPLY C . $477.20 NIRDNARE/TOOLS_S �__._.___. .-..__._ 69294 SUPE INC. 5113.62 I SUPPLIES - a: 9.294 SUPER IC ICE CORP. f126.91 ICECE 0 +i 90295 THE SUPPLIERS _ f2•933.36 SIGNS e Frl�992l6---_-- --TA-Rd-ET -------- -- - � i33.S6 SIGNS -..+�= 094297 CHARLES E. THOMAS 32.936.40 INSTRUM8N1'P 094296 - TO EE N RERAIR_SERVIfE$ _ __. _. f95.00 ORRICE SUPPLIES w � 3,4299 TONY•S LUCK a SAFE SERVICE $273.96 SECURITY 699305 140 CELAVAL INC. $2.216.71 MECHANICAL PARTS -i0943E1 __._ ...._ . . TRAVEL TRAVEL _ _ _. _ . 3091a1L TRAVEL SERVICES 094302 - TIUCN't AUTO SUPPLY. INC. IT73.76 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS - - 3- 094301 J.O. TUCKER 6 SON. INC. 1716.34 B28 CELLS 094!54 ._..__.CITY OF 7US71N ._ .. _ .._._.- gd9621. WATER USEAAE _ - a§Oas UNIVERSITY SALES & SERVICE $211.46 TRUCK PARTS 094Z46 VWR SCIENTIFIC $19P.72 LAB SUPPLIES �-_J _ a993hT _ VALLEY CITIES SUFPLY C0.__ ____ 094509 Vi-EY EREST LIN65YiFE. INC. 318r S91.O4 CONSTRUCTION P2-35-1 i 094309 THE VAN SHACK 3737.76 VEHICLE MAINS .N 099310 VAN CORER RUBBER CO. USER PEE_yERPAYMPN2__ u YI PCC-HEAT TP CFTN EASCU. - 347.44 COMPRESSOR •194312 V6REC DIV. OF EMERSON 553.11 FREIGHT .94313_____VEHICLE._SIN INS SERVICE .g}p.a TRUC[ PARTS_ 094315 WEE LC04ST ANALYTICAL 319.762.11 LTRUCKS ABS • 094315 WEST COAST ANRLYTICFL SRC. f95 T.0Y LAB X7020m n; 09M 316 - WEST COAST TEPMIRALST. INC. _. _ ]9.6C IBROZ )020 39R]1T LESTEPN ST/.TE-GMEEICAL SUPPLY S51,45Od9 CAUSTIC BOOR N.0.5-13_67 _ 394316 R0Y F. WESTON. IRE. 32r225.G. LAB SERVICES 09 A3I5 SIL SONS EQUIPMENT 4ENTALS.]NC _ ____ .__,__fSy Q.:________,_ EQUIPMPNT,BER2el __._ _ _ __ 6IK[Kr MRPX- - - - - 321.60 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE O94321 WOODVARD CLYOE CONSULTANTS 31059.74 CONSULTING ENGINEERS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/28/86 PAGE G REPORT DUMSER AP43 COUNTY c"jjSjICN DISTRICTS OF OR4NGl CLAIPS PAID 08/03/88 I, WARRANT NO. .__ Y x D AxT,uxi nrxro TPn nx 494322 7CROA COPP, 94.332.37 COPIER LEASES _ G94323 JEEFF NKERS :227.00 VALVE _ C943N JEFF }OxKEPS $27.0E H@IAYCE MILGCR ui ----------------- -- - TOTAL EL41N5 PAID 3K/03/2B ---7—,962,408 21 III OPER POND 6 29.93 +� ' R2 DFER FUKD _—. _.... - 810.58 •� 42 P/R FOOD) 1.537.825.76 i /3 Oln FORD 9.493.7E T FUND --.—.— 2I0.080r35 /5 OYU FORT, 2,005.35 /5 AGO FUND 4.161.02. —�6OPE8 FUND ------- ---- - -- 5,351.90 I'" /7 OPER I= 35.221.73 19 '+S /7 T/R FUND �026.44 �OPCR FUND 16.54 -�..., /II ACO FODR 275,794.16 _ �OPCR FUND 5.991.38 V_T ACT,Pu i, 43N4.20 •� ..D /67 CPU FUND 7:674:44 _ , 07a14 OPM nOet 3,472.46 _ -- Ti OFM fl11A — - — - I.020,077.01 CORD 4.682.233.17 - JS WORKING CAPITAL PID10 114,859.01 =1 8 7,966,548.49 i. 1+I F UNDO P14Y - JT 'IST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE d/)9/PP CASE 1 REPORT INMSER AF4'_ " al CLAIMS PAID O6117/89 POSTING DATE O8117/80 ,l MAS SY3TE n3. 1':C .ISS.i.• ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _ A GSA 3.6 A-VI OD S2.525.TG GENERATOR 094347 AWC INCORPORATED $2.55 FREIGHT RI ART, 994349 LICOLM CARCETS C INTERIDPS 5502.94 FLOORING P9435O ACTION INSTRUMENTS. INC. 51019.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS I�• 094352 READ TECH SURVEYS. INC. S5L9.90 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 994353 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. 125.04 ELECTRIC PARTS �• •94 Y5g LASING ASSOCIITE1/ALLETITE S1.552.5P VEHICLE LEASES a9g356 ALLIEI CORPORATION S16.499.23 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-87 aaRM 090348 ALL PURE CHEMICAL $56.134.15 CHLORINE N.0.10-14-87 w 094359 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 32.219.94 MANHOLE SCHEMES ^� ]Y.361 ANDERSON ASPHALT PAYING CC, SS):..H PARSING LOT STRIPING ;An JY4.62 ASSOCIATED LA2CRATOPIEF fI63.Y4 LAB SERVICES TS3 094564 BACHARACNa INC. $50.34 INSTRUMENT REPAIR X 694365 BAKER ECUIFMENT RENTALS S132.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT y 2 �„Ip0 -54'.�6T BAYTEP SCIEWT/FTC FROCUCTS 51.:65.52 LAN SUPPLIES 'as i�-C11 %941E6 CORC?.T 9:i'..VILLIAR FF CSi i {3 f31.391:77 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 88-53 09e STO 9OLTPONIY O4T4 MAINTENANCE 5100.3] MANNTENANCE CONTRACT 9 1 'J 993T1 BON_A_RUES $156.8U TRUCE PARTS h "'"IPA¢II ic. SIE 59 1 ] PH Out B£I10 •3T3 i9ONN S CILEWELL CONSULTIVP. 16.139.52 LAB SERVICES 1 9.374 CJILDING NEWS, INC. 153.'t PUBLICATION j 094376 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. IMC. S1.872.GO SURVEYING SERVICES P1-20 w 094377 GARY G. SYNCED - S2.375.25 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT MY— fsht� FREIGHT p f�.3T9 CAL-GLASS PCP 3ESTA.CH. INC." S1.5E3.4. LAB REPAIRS +� I :g43¢3 C'LTAOL • "-C. fT55.Pa REGULATOR PAATS R9Yd6r B+CtW+wi-A SUHk99I-Bi.-SYSTEMS ft Di-n PIRB-PROTECTION-MAEN4ENA2S 094382 CANBAIDGE FILTER CORP. 352L.52 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES im 194303 CASTLE S223.04 SERVICE AGREEMENT �ia38 EEM 9RY - FSTY I38 EEM 9RY - FSTY IMRT 9 -C AFBPY-BBPPLFEB Vfi5 CHSFWEST I^CUSTP.IES. IMC. f25.3q R.q5 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-19-87 9.3F5 CMFCMIFE - 4 VIDEG JET CC. 5145.T5 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIR �3���iY�60m111 itew �h 35938E C.I.E.S. • CO. • INC. 4(55.90 MAINTENANCE PARTS Iw "I 6943E9 CONSOLI36TE6 ELECTRICAL OI37. $2.534.40 ELECTRICAL PARTS I U FUND NO ^1P9 - JT FIST WOPMING CeFIT<L PROCESSING DATE 8/19/86 PAGE 2 u RE-ORT HUM9ER &PIS ' CLAIMS PAID 08/37/99 POSTING DATE 18/17/88 P :94IS' CONSOLIDATED REe60GPA.PICS S1.S23.72 BLUEPRINTING ,^ 06 094392 CONTROL OAT. CORP. $129.35 COMPUTER REPAIRS 1094393 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 5264.55 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS al a R 94.55 CREST COATING INC. 5212.40 LAB SUPPLIES �e 09939E CIL 'VATFP 5.01.25 RENTAL EQUIPMENT In, 194398 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE S2*124.62 TIRES �y 054399 OECMCR INSTRUMENT SUPPLY CO. $224.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS gal �M :•9.4^.I OOP4O0 ENTFPoe <� - B-SSRV-IC£B- ISE. IRC. $5,735.1. EMERGENCY REPAIRS SEWER PIPE ^94402 DRESSCP INOUSTPIESa INC. 5124.33 MECHANICAL PARTS C94494 DUMB EDWARDS CORP. S1.745.65 PAINT SUPPLIES I,N 094405 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. $93.29 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES E7AAC3 Y. H. EFERT COP.. 99te.964.55 CONSTRUCTION 5-29 r 9..9E ETFI SERVICES* IMMC. $4??.5C CONSULTING SERVICES m 094410 ECZEL $24.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES X 09s431 JOHN E. FALKENSTEIN P.E. 53.229.24 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-20 a2 W ZMA.33 FER9ELLFAS 5127.2T. PROPANE dad '94.14 FIPEF GLASS STPUCTU:AL FNAP. 5194.eL ENGINEERING SERVICES laN Fl. ;Fp aeas It PARTS tO C94416 FISCHER S P09TEP CO. S3*512.42 CHLORINATION PARTS W 1 094417 FLO"SYSTEPS 5533.J0 NECEANICAL PARTS "94 AIs F3UNTITN VALLEY CdMERa $11.96 PHOTO PROCESSING ^e492' FPL'JCE CO^PPP53OR FeCOCCT 513.319.3E COMPRESSOR PARTS 094422 GFS CHEMICALS 518.91 LAB SUPPLIES ael 094423 GANAHL LUMBER CO. S1069.44 LUFIBER/HARDWARE .. 2' SF F k k'- 29' ES III-y?— bBPH .11 9 '94425 GEP.AAOS PHOTO L4E SG.53 FILE 19.A26 SIFlLICh-MITCn•LL. E':C, Y15*212.5. MECEANICAL PART ERViees Pi 20-- fan 1194428 GORDOV'S* INC. S270.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 396429 DON GREEN S ASSOCIATES 58.855.5! ENGINEERING SERVICES DIST 267 LP4431 "OL SIGEN C.V.S. CLLSF. s R+C. 535.9. MECHANICAL PARTS 114432 I.C. hOFFI•4N AT6/CP ISCO S157.EL INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 194434 MOUSE O� IATTEFIES 52.865.9P BATTERIES 094435 MUF FY CORFORAY IIN 540.26 BICYCLE PARTS �m 'M FHML P.0 !199 - JT FIST VOPKI49 C'FIT6L Fi07ESSING OAT: 3/09/8! P4GE t •J REPORT NUMBER IF43 CLAIMS PAID l0/17/S8 POSTING DATE CS/17/86 OF Go .� t94436 F.S. MUoNE3 CO.. INC. f2 Q50.3: HARDWARE 994130 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $63.95 HARDWARE 4s� P94439 1WC ON SYSTEMS. INC./ S20.5!1.77 EMMTSIONS CONTROLS :94.41 INDUSTRIAL QASTE 33S.10 SUBSCRIPTION '�.N :94..2 INTEARITIOMAL FUSINESS HACPIRE $334.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 09.144 KAMAN BEARINGS A SUPPLY S957.22 FITTINGS �s� 094445 KELTM 6 ASSOCIATES 1T.103.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES ^! nnua .199 !EA41N6. INC. 62.349.24 MACSINE SUPPLIES 19..40 JULY LEE f73.P1 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE •'� 194450 LIFECOM-SAFETT SERVICE SUPPLY $174.95 CYLINDER REPAIR 094451 RIP. LINDSTROM. INC. S9.514.61 ENVIRONMENTAL COWSULTING SERVICES h IS-4!3 M4LCOLr PIRNIE A ISFA f13.776.73 ENGINEERIWG SERVICES SEE 86-146 C94454 91CHARD NAREELLI 3139.25 EMPLOYEE MEETING 6 TRAVEL X 09.456 MATT - CHLOR. INC. S150.74 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES L !9..57 PCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP 9213.69 TRUCK PARTS .i94Ae9 VFC mTOf 295GCI.TES. WC. 11.917.1: - INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES �a 'S44f• CiO.PE COro UTE• f325.6i COMPUTER PARTS 'y 1320 939.12 OFFICE SOPIEIES y 'W 094462 NLICEN EUNTICM CONSTRUCTION CO 396A41.!8 CONSTRUCTION 1-28R-1 - 1 L9.163 MOTOROLA, INC. $99.11 BATTERY I� px M65+ V OERTrIN!. 4t44.15 M � AL SCIC PART - 1_� "RAG, 44TIONIL SANITARY SUPPLY 4139.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ]M �9 A4f5 NEAL SUPPLY CC. t417.32 FITTINGS 10 C9446d NEUTRON 93.1I9.L. ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-12-87 .d 09..69 NEQARM ELLCTPONICS 1257.C9 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ! v9.471 NOPTM -E4TaL ILE.. 6146.P! INSTRUMENT PARTS 194472 OFFICE COVILION/IMTiRLOB RE., 3255.122.E OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-5 094.71 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 9164.36 '.: AUTOMOTIVE PUTS 091 ORANGE VALVE L FITTING CO. 1151.15 SITTINGS As 46 O 1 •'9..77 COUNTY SANITATION CISTPICT 55.717.22 REIMBURSE WORKERS COWP INSURANCE :9447P. PACIFIC PARTS S39.19 BLECTRONIC EQUIPMENT -i5 =p PUMPS 4N 1- NeCNANICAt PARTSIAN - i. 91.2P PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CP. 1508.45 SAFETY SUPPLIES 09..P1 PACIFIC BELL $15.74 TELEPHONE A- I1C J FUND k0 .:59 - JT C1ST VVPRIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING CATE SIC9196 PAGE . ' REPORT MUN3ER 'PIS CLAIMS PAID 38/17/88 POSTING DATE CB/I7/U �I - •' 19.407 PRCTEL CELLULAR t3)J9 CELULAR PHONE SERVICE - -Mal ph SANTIORTAID SUPPLIES 0949A4 PAUL 04PANE0 $656.75 PEER REVIEW COMMITES EAPENSES OP.405 PEAT. MARVICKv PAIN L CO. 511.929.0G PROFESIONAL SERVICESGA.— PY46 —OPINIONS ON? IS? IF G R.417 PHOTO A SnUaD CO, t92.21 COMPUTER SOPTWAAB !• n 9..0E FICKVICK FFFEP 1936.66 JANITORIAL SOPPLIBS 094493 PITNEY BDYES 1161.3E POSTAGE METER RENTAL P99R91 POLY ENTERPRISES. INC, $593.32 SAFETY SUPPLIED '99.93 - ei GFESSIONAL TRAlkIbG ASSOC S56.09 SUBSRIPTION 'n 'AuFESSI0.YAL TIRE :IRE SI.9:3.': TREE REMOVAL 094496 PULSAFEEDER 9420.20 PUMP PARTS 09.697 RADIAN CORP. $6.535.48 CON6TRUCTION gERVICE6 n aA9sE REMEDY TEMA 1929.25 TEMPORARY SBRVICES )9♦S:J THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. t1.J99..b PIPE/FITTINGS AP �x OH 902 RICOH CORPORATION S92.00 COPIER LEASES = 099F03 ROYCE INSTRUMENT $2.191.12 INSTRUMeNT 1++1 fb 7R.SG9 SAS CARS/SAklo5. S24C.FA OVERSPRAY REPAIR 'R•!16 SANTA A4A ;LCCTAIC -nTZIS 12063.37 ELECTRIC MOTOR Ito 094504 CITY OF SELL OCACN $73.72 WATER OSBAGB IW I 29A 409 SEARS. POEPUCK t CO. $336.70 PRESSER IS 1ps I, 19.511 SK1I. AIFE i SUFPLY. Ibt 1392.v5 SAFETY SIGNS .R PLUMBING SUPPLIES�» film SOIL SND if ITIuG E4'IIIECRS 131G..: SOIL TESTING WPH I��i 09.!lA SO. CAL. GAS CO. $4.469.76 NATURAL GAS �••I 094519 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 59.567.5. DISH FUEL ^-EP GAIN, INC - as �R -- no.!17 STAF TOOL + SUFPLY CO. t34b•9 TOOLS icy ...... $0414. I4C. 1IS.413.33 VIDEO SERVICES ACTION PLAN 09452V SUPER CHEN CORR 1657.21 CEPSIICALH I� 795521 THE SUPPLIERS f3.593.35AD TOOLB/NARpNRRE j 194!23 SUIN)LIAE CC. SSI.OP OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR +a'`iG TA 0 TAR G1114 E a2f650 66 j.i COMPACT GR0UDSKEEPING CRRI EAR1S 09952E INO OELAYAL INC. 51.994.99 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES S. E9.!PT IMO OEL.YAL INC. f9.961.^•9 MECHANICAL PARTS u 1-4 FU40 'lSQ JT MIST VOAMINf, Cf-1TAL P EPO A90CE0.T SS RIN6UMB UAEi TE 9/'19/S6 Fe OE A •--� of A3 E MAINS 1A10 ".B/17/BB POSTING GATE 0B/11/BB a� :19P52P TiaVEL T91VEL S90A0; TMVEL SERVICES 094530 TWINING LABORATORIES 31,189.50 LAB SERVICES 09.531 UNOCAL $146.41 GASOLINS ^94531 VWP SCIENTIFIC 53,033.42 LAB SUPPLIES I1. n9n5N VALLEY CI II_-S $UPaLY CO. }h 113.9;1 HARDWARE 094536 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $2.610:15 BUILDING REPAIRS 094537 JONN P. WAPLES A519A2 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT .`9 4 539 VEST COAST ANALYTICAL SRV. it•J5C.A4 LAB SERVICES ".511 WESTERN STATE Cv[fICAL SUPFLY Srir379.6E CAUSTIC SODA M.0.5-13-67 0945.2 WILSON•S EQUIPMENT PEMTAL3QNC - 5691.2E EQUIPMENT RMALS a 094543 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES 596.9E HARDWARE _ T w SUlON1RY AMOUNT a —I tl OPSR FUND 2 OPBR FUND , 0.71 Wj t2 FUND 2 OVER ND ,2440.50 3 BPBR FUND 27,240.67 7 2 67 t3 ACO POND 9fi,117.66 P! t5 OPER UNND 039.19 i5 ACO POND 12 37.65 16 OPEN, POND 0.65 17 DOVE PFORPEFERU 16,260.00 111 OPER FUND aV t11 OPER FUND . t 761 ACO FUND 548.666.20 1600 /]611 OP6R FUND 367.70 JT OPSR POND 411,367.80 COMP 116,017.22 SBLP PUNDBD WORKERS COMP INSURANCE POND 9,059.72 JT OPER FUND 109.059.]2 - 'p 51.617.335.07 L. Sa FUND NO 91?' - JT .^1ST WORKING CAPITAL FROCES31N0 GATE A/24/nP FO6E REFOPT 6URdER AP43 COUNTY SLl:I TaTION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FOR L' . WARRANT NO. VEMOOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 59.59E 1A EGUIPNENT 523.:8 TRUCK PARTS -94E97 A.F. INVUST-TAL E6614ECRING 12. 05..5 MECHANICAL PARTS 094599 ACACIA/VYR ELECTRONICS $331.56 INSTRUMENT PART 09460d ACCESSORIE AIR COMPRESSOR SYS. 01.901.3T AIR DRYER n i 94692 ADV4NCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. 51.843.435.47 CONSTRUCTION 5-15 19.6E3 AIR FRODUCIS 6 CHEMICAL INC. f167.4V CHEMICALS 294605 ALLIED CORPORATION $11.988.54 CATIONIC POLYMER N.O. 3-11-07 �H 094606 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. 912.71 FREIGHT 'N 19.608 AAERICAY CAST IRON PIPE CO./ f9.254.92 MECHANICAL PARTS 1.94f:9 ANFRIT`_CN 5394.:A COPIER SUPPLIES 094611 AMANEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 55.013.63 EYCAVATION/SEXES REPAIR 094612 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 12.591.49 PUMP PARTS .194614 A-PLUS SYSTEMS f4.693.91 NOTICES 6 ADS �a C94615 APPLIED FILPATION t2d.43.68 PIPE STOPPER AN EX SERVICES. Ille. 38,292.88 wiffeRM RENTALS 2 Fq 0946IT ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES 5320.30 LAB SUPPLIES J 394618 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $1,534.50 SOIL TESTING ^� ti :4.E2i ANSA - CONFERENCE OF COASTAL f1.i20.:O MEMBERSHIP DUES ^.E 21 APE' S675.1.11 CONFERENCE FEES �Cl 094 E23 BC [kOU SiRIAL SUPPLY. INC. $296.64 SLINGS In I .94E2. FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 235Q19.47 GRIT REMOVAL M.O.10-29-86 r9462E P,L, BAAOTTI AND ASSOC. f4.73d.J0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-25.26.P1-32.33 'E.627 B. 6ATEnAN f565.:: DEFERRED CONP DISTRIBOTION G94629 BE tKMAN IMOUSTPIAL CO. 553.00 REPAIRS 094630 ROBERT BEIN.YILLIAM FROST f AS SI.332.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES MS 88-52 RV3BP3 BEST 9 '94632 SLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS 5635.PE CONCRETE 19..33 SOLER PAOIATOP SERVICE 546.:: RADIATOR REPAIR 894635 BROUN A CALDYELL $8.259.40 LAB SERVICES �4 09463E BROW% A CALDYELL CONSULTING $24.345.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 08-40 !94638 SUCKS CLOCK SHOFFE INC. 1513.05 C3 K REPAIRS '.9.639 GARY 9. STAEED %5)1.79 PL^PPY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 094E 41 C.N.B. SERVICE CO. $143.34 VALVE rJ FU( .0 ' °1 .9 JT OIST VORkING CAPITAL PROCESSING ORE -P/2H8R PAGE 2 J PEFORT NUMBER AP.3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON TV WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRI°TTON �I ^9R692 C. M. 1. ' 577.75 INSTRUMENT REPAIR .9.643 CAL •CMEN CORP. 59.629.3, CHEMICALS 494695 CAROLLO-BOYLE.A JOINT VENTURE $193.912.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 87-131 ' 694646 JOHN CAROLL-O ENGINEERS i189.556.13 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1?1-21.J-6-2.1?1-22 MOST ICAT!o is I9.648 CENTURY SAFETY INST. S SUPF. 9912.8E 6AFBTY SUPPLIES A :94649 FIPERGRATF 979.23 CLIPS 09.651 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. N.76S.19 UNLEADED GASOLINE 09.652 CMRISTEVE CORP. $237.332.30 CONSTRUCTION 11-16 :9A656 COASTLINE CONSTRUCTION 329.565.17 CONSTRUCTION 5-27 :94655 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF 690°S.°4 ENGINE PARTS 094657 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 64r562,24 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 09665E CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $5,351.44 BLUEPRINTING RM .99E63 CONTROL DATA CORPORATIOM i1.559.57 COMPUTER REPAIR !94661 R. E. COULTER .CRANE RENTAL 9519.7P CRANE RENTAL jPP TTI 094663 CAL WATER $84.56 RENTAL EQUIPMENT X 094669 LARRY CURTI TRUCK L EQUIFMENT $26.800.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL 6-13-89 ••I 394666 STATE OF CALIF9RNTA .IOG.v3 REORGANIZATION 111 PROCESSING FEE 6°4667 N.A. O.JACY COMFARY 6T63.33 TRUCK PARTS N9EST .. C99669 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $170.67 LAB SUPPLIES C9.670 DEW-PAR SALES S SERVICE $3,223.24 MECHANICAL PARTS h 'gat 72 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYSTEPSr INC. 65:165.0; MECHANICAL PARTS `°.03 DORADO ENTEPPRISES. INC. 312.670.C: INSTRUMENT REPAIRS/PLANT MAINTENACE 0996TS OOY NEY•S 801E ER i WELDING REP. $1.921.00 KNOWING SERVICES Iw 094676 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2.353.64 PRINT SUPPLIES '.Y.M1Id EIRCO °ROCEES FOUIR. CO. 9945.6J MECHANICAL PARTS t99679 EASTMAN. INC. 9631.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 094661 EMERSON INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS 32.700.50 NAINTENACE AGREEMENT .M USAGES ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. 9260.00 LAS SAMPLING .94E84 FIT SAND ARC 99AVEL. INC. $268.65 GRAVEL `96685 MARSHALL FAIF.RES 5331. i0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION U94687 FAAR SALES L SERVICE t253.02 ELECTRIC PARTS iw FUND NO 11P9 - JT GIST 6OKKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8124/PS PAGE _ REPORT NUM3ER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY WARRANT X0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 49.65b FELERAL EMPRESS CORP. 62T1.25 AIR FREIGHT :946G9 FERRELLGAS f55.42 PROPANE U94691 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $31.27 LAB SUPPLIES L, 694692 FLAT L VERTICAL CONCRETE $153.00 ASPRALT CUTTING 094694 GEL4ER FUMPS. INC. 6279.00 PUMP PARTS C9.695 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $49.79 FILM I�7 394697 DONALD L. FOX I ASSOCIATES $5.475.00 SAFETY CONSULTING 094698 FREDSON $99.67 TRUCK PARTS C94760 6ARIATT-CALLAMAN COMPANY Slt7.4C CHEMICALS 194701 GENERAL TELEFHONE CO. L5.619.66 TELEPHONE 694703 GIERLICM-MITCMELL. INC. f18.982.62 MECHANICAL PARTS 094764 GORDON-S. INC. $311.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES .9473 MRANX +. GEINME flSr5P 1.00 USED VSBICLE 04747 GRINNELL CORPORATION 11r361.-4 VALVES m 094709 FRED A. HARPER 51.5 12.94 DEPOSITED COMP DISTRIBUTION X 094710 "ARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $79.16 LAB SUPPLIES Lo :94,12 S. A. MEALY CO. I6s1.:46.3.1 CONSTRUCTION PI-23R 094713 HOERPIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . IYC. 1229.60 MECHANICAL PARTS . � 094715 HOOPER CAMERA STORES $160.86 FILM ��• 094716 ROD HOUSER 93.66 REFUND OVERPAYMENT W !4471E CITY OF NUNTINGTON PEACH �$46.56 WATER USEAGE 4.119 PUNTIKGTC\ ECH CO%V. HOSPITAL 21.447.4E REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 094721 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,233.99 FITTINGS �>e 294722 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY F75.00 TECHNICAL COMPUTER SUPPORT .5472. IRVINE C"-E A $153.64 FILM 9472E URVIAE FAXLH WATER DISTRICT t1L i:0r;b."U DIST 14 DEPOSIT REFUND 394727 CHARLES A. JACKS t19.".O EMPLOYEE TRAVEL 6 MEETING EXPRESS l.: .91728 RIVIERA FINANCE 14119.17 JANITOAIRL SUPPLIES -9.734 JONES 2 STONES ASSOC..INC. i3.479.62 PROFESSIONAL SEAVICES SIR STUDY -9.7l1 A0PEPT JORDAN 533.:5 EMPLOYEE TRAVEL 6 MEETING EXPENSE :94753 MAKER COMPANY S2r244.68 HARDWARE jw "1 J A4O 9199 • JT LIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE -0/24/AB PAGE 4 .J REPORT NUMBER AP45 C^UP.TY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY WARRANT 40. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 094734 KENNEDY xYOPAULICS 1999.6. PUMP PRESS :94731 HIEWIT PACIFIC CO. 11.473.u4-24 CONSTRUCTION P1-20,P1-31 !I 094737 DONALD E. KINNEY $805.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION L'I 094736 HIRST PUMP f MACHINE WORKS $319.06 t03CHANICAL PARTS H C9474t LAB SAFETY SUFPLY CO. f294.00 SEMINAR .� :94741 LCE L RO CONSULTING EMGP. 145.432.d0 ENGINEERING SERVICES ICJ 094743 LIMITORBUE CORP. f917.38 MECHANICAL REPRESS 094111 N.P. LINOSTP6n. INC. 52 dJ0.OJ TECHNICAL SUPPORT-ARK SSCC. COMPUTER SUPPORT �x A94746 MFS 1154.63 PHOTOGERPHIC SERVICES i S4747 MAIN FRAME SERVICES 11.722.dC INSTRUMENT REPAIR :ee 094749 MARTIN SUPPLY CO. f160.SB EAEDIURE a 014750 MARVAC ELECTRONICS f253.90 INSTRUNENT SUPPLY A M :94752 MATT - CHLOR. INC. 1325.4E CHLORINATION SUPPLIES '94753 0. 1. MATTHEWS L ASSOCIATES 11Q82.d1 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIESTO MCCROMM! ER CORP 9315-2 �•� m 091755 MCKENNA ENOR. S EQUIP. $3 d25.1] MECHANICAL PARTS X = t94T56 METAL FINISHING 928.06 SUBSCRIPTION '�•� W f94756 FILLERS PRINTERY 11.545.46 PRINTING SSA TSS MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. 31.442.18 SAFETY SUPPLIES N ] 2BR 3 s0 (l 094761 POFFRTE NICHOL ENGINE[RS 112.J93.9B ENGINEBRING SERVICES 1 094762 MICHAEL 0. MOORE $92.72 EMPLOYEE TRAVEL 6 MEETING UPSTAGE :94764 KOTOPOLA. INC. 1115.12 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 'S4T65 M37ONOLA CELLULAO SERVICES fM1.4! CELLULAR SERVICES 094767 NATIONAL LUMBER $231.99 HARDWARE/LUMBER !.r 094160 NATIONAL PUNT SERVICES. INC. $625.08 TV INSPSCTIONS j•" `547T: UNITED MOTTINGPAY 1292.43 RENTAL UNITS .4477: G.M.S. f1.155.9E TRASH BINS 5i —C J9 N73 OCCUPATIONAL VISION BEPYICfS $339.94 SAFETY GLASSES w 0947774 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY f2B5.56 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES `9 N75 ORANGE VALVE I. FITTIf:G CO. S599.7? FITTINGS .94 T71 OSCAP•S LOCK 3 SAFE $374.15 SECURITY/KEYS cop COWAN C 9aTH OKY 4EN SERVICE 0 662.11 7! SPBCIALTY GASSES 4n FUND NO ^194 . JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE R/24/06 FAGS ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CCUNTY WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION e 94760 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4,622.93 SERVICE AGREEMENT :94781 COUNTY OF ORANGE 5197.992.6O DISPOSAL FEES 094783 CSOOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS $50.000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE �!I 094784 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $4.253.66 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE '94766 PSG SERER SERVICES. INC. f1.01.GG W INSPECTION d94787 PACIFIC ELECTRIC. INC. 5132.12f.GO CONSTRUCTION J-16 I�'I 094789 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $162.43 SAFETY SUPPLIES 094790 PACIFIC BELL $545.45 TELEPHONE '94 T92 PALLETS R ACCESSORIES CO. tl N9L8: PALLETS 1947?3 PARTS UNLIMITED $694.90 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 094796 PHOTO L SOUND CO. 55.297.15 COMPUTER PARTS 094796 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS. INC. $39.624.45 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.O. 5-11-00 !-94795 44ROLO PRIRPOSE ICE f231..3 ICE C94799 TOE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. l2.274.41 INSTRUMENT INSPECTION 15 7l C94801 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY 5627.00 FENCING 094802 QUEST INTL. MONITOR SERVICE $1.066.50 INSTRUMENT REPAIR :99fC9 RED VINO 940ES �391.ST SAFETY SHOES :49 E05 F.E.O.I. $937.62 INDEXES 094807 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. f1.S3991 FITTINGS I'�M 394938 RICOH CORPORATION 4144:70 COPIER LEASES ..9A611 ROCCO'S TRUCK SALCKING 5132.5G TRUCK PARTS '4611 RODeUSTERS . INC. 1468.46 BUILDING REPAIRS 094B13 BECKMAN INDUSTRIAL/ 51.696.29 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 494814 JOSEPH T. RYERSON L SON9 INC. $4.460.86 METAL .9e t16 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT.L 5252.671.;7 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 6-10-87 •1 11 !SA COAST DESIGNS f193." OFFICE FURNITURE C 9e R19 SNAP-CN TOOLS CORP. S24.I8 TOOLS ,.j 094820 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS 1210.0O SOIL TESTING AY6 EP9� BGUTH COAST DODGE $22.44 TRUCK PARTS ••94623 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. 5534.J47.33 POWER :94825 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $1,443.46 WATER/COOLER RENTALS �µ FUND +.0 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CFFITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/24/82 PAGE E J REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY vl WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ' SPIRAL 9I1OIN6 CO., INC. 3196.9E OPPICE SUPPLIES h L94627 SPIFES REST.URANTS• INC. $6u 55 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 694829 SUBIA. INC. $1.769.95 VIDEO TAPE PRODUCTION ACTION PLAN ul 094830 SUPELCO. INC. 580.12 LAB SUPPLIES 29463E TAYLOR-OUNN $235.27 TRUCR PARTS. u� o94P33 TEKMAR COMPANY 56,143.70 LAB EOUIPmEwVMS, cog... Otte, ANICAt CORP. ....50.00 5EVICEN 694835 TINAER S RASOR 5468.60 DETECTOR C948-6 IRO DELAVAL INC. 31.786.10 MECHANICAL PARTS 'N '9e F38 M.O. TPERtCE CO. $136.33 - INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES <.94R39 TRONBETTA CORP09 ATION 51..9N.26 VALVE PARTS vi 094841 J.G. TUCKER 6 SON. INC. $592.20 FAN 094842 TWINING LABORATORIES 6280.90 CONCRETE TESTING Mill EN "59.R.4 THE•UNISOURCE CORP. •I ITT• 194q.q6 OFFICE SUPPLIES 94645 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5223.86 PARCEL SERVICES In 094B4T URBAN ALTERNATIVES 511.505.00 ACTION PLAN C0MMITY OUTREACH 494848 GUN SCIENTIFIC $3.555.3C LAB SUPPLIESmmwxiw :94656 VALLEY CREST LA Y.DSC aPP.•INC. $132:112.-1 CONSTRUCTION P2-35-1 LU d94E51 - VALLEY CETARIT DIESEL 115070.0W GENERATOR • 094653 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP 5135.16 CABLE I� n 594R54 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5614.38 SOFTWARE 4TY .9.656 WALTCRS HOEILE HOME SERVICE 5477.E-1 BUILDING MATERIALS 194e5T CARL WARREN S CC. S277.9C INSURANCE SERVICES7� t 94E59 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUFF41 923.J87.11 CAUSTIC SODA M.O. 5-13-87 C9486G WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $344.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES :94862 ROURKE a WOODRUFF • 527.930.98 LEGAL SERVICES M.O. 10-14-87 =94Y53 WOOCVARD CLYDE CONSULTANTS S2. 25.22 CONSTRUCTION FEILD SERVICES 094865 XEROX CORP. $5.866.66 COPIER LEASES 'P 294666 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES 663.55 HARDWARE P FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/24/80 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08 31 88 POSTING DATE 8 31 88 s SOMERS Y AMOUNT 41 6 547.80 5 212.06 42 16 ,'13.90 43 3,961.68 �. 320.79 0 8 45 2,555.61 �• 4S 29,565.07 ,y 46 339.45 V. 47 10,369.74 47 1,873.00 411 2,779.55all 237,082.06 .�. 414 12,000,114,00 1566 9,794.52 4667 1,388.6E 47914 3,181.11 CORD 5,060,952.39 •'a SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 60,738.31 WORKIND 20 323 364,24 I� I� IW -N v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE j Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on '�r.Au,�l� 19 y8 was duly posted for public inspection - at the main lobby of the Districts ' offices on 'I 19�qQ . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of N 19W. Rita J. Brown, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California