Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-04-25 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS /\ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Bfa P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 q, gyp+ 10844 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92MB-7018 (714)982 2411 April 18 , 1988 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 13 MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. YORBA LINDA CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4845 Casa Loma Avenue Yorba Linda, California u Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of April 13, 1988, the Board of Directors of county Sanitation District No. 13 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date to review the District's long-range financial program. Se retary BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 21 County Sanitation Districtsron off is. eas a of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephorer: Am Cede 714 DISTRICT No. 13 622-24111 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 25, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. YORBA LINDA CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS (1) Roll call (2) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on speci is agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. ( 3j Staff report on master-planned sewerage facilities for serving District No. 13 (4) Consideration of items re long-range financial program: .J (a) staff report on long-range financial program (b) Discussion (5) Consideration of action on items relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1302, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1301 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilitiess (Copy enclosed with Directors, agenda material) : (a) Report of General Counsel re proposed ordinance. (b) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1302, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1301 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (c) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. 1302, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1301 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and pass to second reading on may 11, 1988. (6) Consideration of action on items relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1303, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No,. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Sections 703, 704, 705 and 706 of Ordinance No. 1301 (Copy enclosed with Directors ' agenda material) : (a) Report of General Counsel re proposed ordinance. (b) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1303, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Sections 703 , 704, 705 and 706 of Ordinance No. 1301, by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (c) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. 1303, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Sections 703, 704, 705 and 706 of Ordinance No. 1301, and pass to second reading on May 11, 1988. (7) Other business and communications, if any (8) Consideration of motion to adjourn -2- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Past OfOn SM $127 County Sanitation California10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, alifomi Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 TeMgcnaa: Arm Cab 714 540-2910 DISTRICT NO. 13 962-2411 MANAGER'S REPORT TO DISTRICT NO. 13 DIRECTORS MEETING DATE: APR IL 25 1988 - 7:30 P.M. or a Lin a ty Ha BACKGROUND During the tax exchange negotiations with the County which ultimately led to the formation of District 13, an out-of-District user fee was established at $140 per single-family residence. As a condition of each new home sale in the area, purchasers signed an acknowledgement of the fee and of potential changes in the future. At that time, user fees were collected by mailing invoices to individual property owners. When District 13 was formed in 1985, the Directors set the annual user fee at $70 per household, higher than the fee in other Districts as no property tax revenue is received by District 13. Public hearings were held and the Directors authorized the user fee to be collected on the property tax bill. At the same time, connection fees were established in three zones: $220 for properties which had paid annexation fees (to annex territory to Districts 2 or 7 which were later included in District No. 13 as part of the formation proceedings) $1,250 for properties in District No. 13 which could be served by gravity and $1,500 for properties requiring pump stations for sewerage service. Although the costs of operating and maintaining the joint treatment facilities have increased each year because of more stringent water quality regulations by the EPA and the state, and increasing costs of materials, supplies and sludge disposal , the user fee in District 13 has not changed. The budgeted Joint Operating cost per million gallons has increased from $277 in 1984-85 when the District was formed to $370 in the 1987-88 budget. This trend is expected to continue as expanded and more complex facilities are placed into service to meet state and federal requirements. All of District 13's capital funds have come from annexation fees transferred during formation and connection fees received since. These capital funds pay for the District's share of joint treatment works construction, the purchase of additional equity/capacity in the existing joint treatment facilities as flows increase and capacity rights in the collection facilities of Districts 1,2,3,6 and 7 as needed to serve District No. 13 (District No. 13 has no sewers of its own). As future projections for the construction of joint treatment facilities include several rehabilitation/reconstruction and advanced treatment projects which benefit all users, not only new development, it would be appropriate now to include a capital charge in the user fee to help fund these projects that benefit all users. April 25, 1988 LONG-RANGE FINANCIAL PLAN ALTERNATIVES Our projections indicate that user fees will need to be systematically increased over the next several years to meet the rising cost of sewerage service and maintain the District in a sound financial condition. Staff has prepared three cash flows to assist the Directors in evaluating alternatives: - Schedule A (pink) reflects the results of maintaining the existing user fee program for the next ten years. This schedule shows a small operating deficit as early as 1990-91 (line 14), which continues through the ten-year period totaling $2.0 million by 1996-97. Capital funds are sufficient for the first five years, but there is a $7.6 million deficit by the end of ten years (line 28). - Schedule B (buff) shows the effects of increasing the user fee 12% each year and raising the connection fee to $1,500 for those properties which did not pay annexation fees. No user fe6s have been allocated to the capital funds on this schedule. A 12% annual increase is sufficient to maintain a positive fund balance in the operating fund for both the five and ten-year planning period. However, This schedule continues to show a capital fund deficit of $6.2 million during the second five-year period (line 29). - Schedule C (goldenrod) increases the user fee 20% each year while raising the connection fee as in Schedule B. Any user fees available after budgeting a 20% contingency reserve fund balance (line 14) in the operating fund are allocated to the capital funds (line 18) for construction/reconstruction of facilities benefiting all users. This schedule projects a reduced capital deficit in 1996-97 of $4.0 million. CONCLUSIONS All three scenarios reflect a capital funding deficit at the end of the ten-year period based on a connection fee of S1,500 per dwelling unit. However, it is expected that the connection fee will continue to increase to pay the cost of sewerage system capacity to serve new development. It is expected that a recommendation for new connection fee rates beyond the $1,500 amount will be submitted to the Boards of all Districts next year upon completion of the new facilities master plan now underway which will determine such new costs. It is clear that the user fee rates and connection fee rates will have to continue to escalate also to pay the rising costs of sewage treatment and to maintain the District's financial integrity. However, there are several unknowns that will have a major impact on the District's cash flow requirements. The District's major funding shortfalls are for capital funding. The projections herein assume that all construction projects proceed on schedule. Thus, the estimates can be considered "worst case" scenarios. However, we continue to experience delays in major projects such as the Central Power Generating System because of SCAQMD requirements. Further delays in this $53 million project would also delay, or at least spread out the need to raise capital funds. The same is true for other capital projects. Conversely, as tlt✓ Directors are aware, if the EPA does not renew the secondary treatment waiver in 1990, the Districts capital needs will increase substantially. The latter might -2- April 25, 1988 >✓ require the issuance of debt certificates to raise capital. Accordingly, the District's financial condition will be evaluated annually and appropriate recommendations submitted for the Board's consideration. 1988-89 FEE RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Board consider the following fee structure for 1988-89: Fee Type Existing Proposed 1987-88 1988-89 Annual User Fee Fee Fee Single-Family Dwellings/Condominiums $70.00 $84.00/Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Dwellings/Apartments $70.00 $67.20/Dwelling Unit Commercial/Industrial/Other (government $70.00 $60.50/1,000 Sq. Ft. buildings, utilities, nonprofit organizations, etc.) One-time Connection Fee Zone A Residential $ 220 $ 220 Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $ 45/1,000 $ 45/1,000 Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Zone B Residential $1,250 $1,500 Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $250/1,000 $300/1,000 Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Zone C Residential $1,500 $1,500 Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $300/1,000 $300/1,000 Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. This proposed user fee schedule incorporates the different levels of fees for mutli-family dwellings and non-residential properties that have been adopted by the other Districts based on actual sewer use studies for the different types of areas. Connection fee increases are proposed only for Zone B, the area which did not pay annexation fees and can be served without additional pumping stations. Zone A property originally paid annexation fees to Districts 2 or 7 and thus the connection fee will stay the same as in those Districts. (It should be noted that Districts 2 and 7 will consider increasing their connection fees in the near future and at that time it would be appropriate for District No. 13 to consider a similar change in Zone A). Other districts do not impose a surcharge for possible pump station construction thus, for consistency, eliminating the differentiation for Zone C is recommended. -3- April 25, 1988 Ordinance Nos. 1302 and 1303 (attached to agenda) incorporate the proposed 20% user fee adjustment and the recommended changes to the connection fee schedule and are presented for consideration by the Directors. Although this change will not completely fund future capital needs, as noted above, it is the first step in establishing a uniform connection fee schedule among the Districts which could be administered by a uniform policy in the future. Staff will review the attached cash flow projections, the proposed user fee increase, the proposed connection fee schedule and the proposed ordinances with the Directors in greater detail at the meeting. -4- ORDINANCE NO. 1302 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1301 ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the District; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992; and, C. That the new connection fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Section 702 of Ordinance 1301 relating to connection charges is, hereby amended to read as follows: Section 702: District No. 13 Connection Charges. A. The District is divided into three (3) separate zones for purposes of development and regulation of sewerage facility use. Said zones are established as Zones A, B, and C, and the boundaries of each are set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. B. Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall �..✓ pay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified as follows: -1- r Zone A• (1) Connection charge for new construction: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $220.00 per dwelling unit. (2) Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the connection charge shall be $220.00 per dwelling unit. (3) Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $45.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $220.00. (4) Connection charge for replacement buildings: �✓ For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (1) and (3) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or construction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. (5) Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings, the -2- connection charge shall be $220.00 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $45.00 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional fixture units. (6) In addition to the charges set forth in Paragraphs (1) through (5) inclusive, above, each applicant for a connection permit for property located in Zone A shall pay to District or its agent, an initial service fee in an amount equal to the annexation acreage fee that was in effect by the applicable District on the date application for annexation was made by the property owner or its representative. Zone B• (1) Connection charge for new construction: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $1,500.00 per dwelling unit. (2) Connection charges for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the connection charge shall be $1,500.00 per dwelling unit. (3) Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $300.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500.00. (4) Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection -3- r charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (1) and (3) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. (5) Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $1,500.00 for each dwelling unit added or created, and in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300.00 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, with a minimum fee of $1,500.00 provided such new construction shall contain additional fixture units. Zone C: (1) Connection charge for new construction: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $1,500.00 per dwelling unit. (2) Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the connection charge shall be $1,500.00 per dwelling unit. (3) Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including but not limited to, -4- commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $300.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500.00 (4) Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (1) and (3) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. (5) Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $1,500.00 for each dwelling unit added or created, and in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300.00 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional fixture units. Section 2: Fees established by Section 702 shall be effective July 1, 1988. Section 3: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. -5- PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held . � Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California -6- ORDINANCE NO. 1303 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS �✓ OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES AND REPEALING SECTIONS 703, 704, 705 AND 706 OF ORDINANCE NO. 1301 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: A. That a financial and engineering report has been prepared setting forth the financial projections for providing sewer service to properties within the District; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports have been made available to the public in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992; and, C. That the new sewer use fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Sections 703, 704, 705 and 706 of Ordinance No. 1301, are hereby repealed. Section 2: Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish a system of sanitary sewer service charges required to be paid by property owners for the services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with its sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and -1- operation of the sewage collection facilities and wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 3: Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing July 1, 1988, each parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with structures designed for residential , commercial or industrial use and connected to the District's system, shall pay a sanitary sewer service charge based on the average volume of wastewater discharged by a class of users in the sum or sums as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance. Section 4: Application of Ordinance. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be in addition to Ordinance No. 1301 of the District establishing regulations for use of District's sewage facilities, including provisions for payment of charges or fees related thereto. Section 5: Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all properties in the District, and no exception shall be provided for properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax exempt organizations, except as expressly provided in Section 6 hereof. Section 6: Exemptions and Appeals. In recognition that certain legal parcels of real property exist within the District which are not connected to the District system and that other properties acquire considerably greater potable water than is ultimately discharged to the District's system, it is the intent of the District that said parcels be exempt totally or in part from the payment of charges as prescribed herein. Any property owner may appeal the assessment of the charges and submit a claim for rebate to the District on the forms prescribed and provided -2- by the District, within one hundred twenty (120) days after the annual bill is mailed. All applications for rebate of the annual sewer service charge will be �..� determined by the General Manager of the District, or his designee, who may grant a partial or full rebate or adjustment of the charge based on receiving satisfactory proof that an inequity exists between the amount and the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's systems. Such inequities may include, but are not limited to the following instances: (a) the use of the parcel differs from the use indicated by the charge; (b) no service connection to the District system exists from the parcel charged; (c) the principal water use is agricultural ; (d) any other use wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of property in question. Section 7: Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year. The sanitary sewer service charge established by this Ordinance shall remain in effect until such time as the rates adopted by the District ordinance are changed, and there shall be no proration of such charges in any fiscal year. Section 8: Method of Collection. Pursuant to the authority granted by California Health and Safety Code Section 5473 and District's Resolution No. 87-89-13, all charges established herein shall be collected on the County Tax Roll in the same manner, by the same persons and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes. The County Tax Collector is authorized and hereby ordered to make said collections in accordance with the terms and conditions of agreements between the County of Orange and this -3- District. In the event District determines that errors or inequities exist in the amount of charges to be collected by the County Tax Collector, District may submit a bill for any difference directly to the property owner. Said invoiced amount shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of invoice date. Section 9: Credit for Industrial Permittees. A credit shall be allowed to all discharges permitted pursuant to Article 3 of Ordinance No. 1301 in an amount equal to the annual sanitary sewer service charge established by Section 3 of this Ordinance in the same manner as credit is allowed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Section 302.6, 303.6 and 304.5(B)(4) of Ordinance No. 1301. Section 10: This Ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1988. Section 11: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of DiFe—ctors County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California -4- TABLE A ORDINANCE NO. 1303 Basis of Minimum Annual Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit Single-Family Charge per $84.00 $84.00 Dwellings Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Charge per $67.20 $67.20 Dwellings/Mobile Dwelling Unit Homes Commercial/ Charge per 1,000 $60.50 $60.50 Industrial/Other square feet of (government building buildings, utilities, nonprofit organizations, etc.) -5- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ND. 13 April 13,961 STAMEN? OP PROJICTID CASH FLOW Page I FISCAL YEARS 1997-BS THROUGH 1995.97 1192.931 INS 1967-60 1986.09 1961.90 1990.91 1991-92 I 5-year Total 1196.91 10 Fear Total 6111 --- ------- 1 OPERATING FOND I Reserves L Carry-aver hoe List Year 149,000 150,000 119,000 131,000 91.000 I 149,000 5,000 143,000 1 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... 1 ........... ............ .-.--------- REVENUE 2 Share of 11 Tam Allocation 0 1 0 0 2 3 User Feet 51,000 81,000 114,000 145,000 171,000 I 561,000 1,356,000 1,925,000 3 1 Interest L Miscellaneous income 12,000 11,000 10,000 0,000 3,000 I 41,000 M000 1 S Other Revenue I 0 0 5 ........... ........... ......0.... ........... .......... 1 ........... ............ ---------..- 6 TOTAL IIVINUI 63,000 93,000 Laren IS3,000 110,000 1 613,000 .1,356,000 1,969,000 6 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ............ 7 TOTAL AVAILABLE FENDING 212,000 213,000 273,000 207,000 271,000 1 762,000 1,361,000 21116,000 7 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- 1 ----------- ------------ ------------ JIFINDITURIS ............ I 8 Share of Joint Worts N A 0 12,000 71,000 113,000 156,000 232,000 I 611,000 2,141,000 3,112,0o0 N 9 Collection System M 6 0 said Other Oper. 20,000 23,000 Isom 30,000 37,000 I 133,000 261,000 314,000 9 10 Other Irpeoditures 1 0 0 10 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- 1 ----------- ............ ............ 11 TOTAL IEPINDITURIS 62,000 94,000 131,000 196,000 266,000 757,000 11109,000 3.866.000 11 ........... ..........0 ........... ........... .......... 1 ----------- ............ ------------ 12 Reserves m Carry-Over to Neat Year 150,000 111,000 I14,000 111000 5,000 5,000 11,1/1,0001 11,740,0001 12 13 Neat Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 11,000 11,000 70,000 96,000 133,000 I 133,000 228.000 228,000 13 ........... .....0..... ........... ........... .......... 1 ........... ............ ------------ 11 Fund Balance or (Deficit) 119,000 102,000 61,000 (7,0001 1120,000) 1 (128,000) 11,176,000) 11,976,0001 1S User Fee for Single Family Residence 110.00 110.00 $70.00 170.00 170.00 110.00 SCHEDULE A 1718M - � � SCHEDULE A� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 April 13,1500 STAMEN? OF PIOJICTIO CASH PLOW Page 2 FISCAL YEAR$ 1987-89 THROUGH 196.17 1992.937 191 1987-81 1988-81 1969.90 1990.91 1191.12 5-leer Total 1996.91 10 Year Total LINT ... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... I ------------ ------------ ............. ---- 15 Reserves 6 Carry-over From Last Year 6,026,000 6,414,000 6,658,000 7,116,000 1,711,000 I 6,026,000 71512,000 6,026,000 IS ........... ........... ........... ----------- .......... ............ ............ ............ RIV9NU1 I 16 COnetrUCtion Greats 3,000 I 3,000 3,000 16 17 fees: Coanection 1f2,000 560,000 %0,000 560,000 560,000 1 2,302,000 2,800,000 51102,000 17 18 Other I 0 0 Is 19 Sale of Capacity lights 1,010 3,000 1,000 11000 8,000 I 14,000 5,000 11.000 19 20 Interest 6 Miscellsaeous Income 47I,000 464,000 411,000 521,000 542,000 I 2,493,000 0 2,411.000 20 21 Other locale I 0 0 21 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ••---......- 22 TOTAL DIVIDES 614,000 11030,000 11050,000 11061,000 1,110,000 I 1,612,000 21605,000 1,697,000 22 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ........... ............ ------------ 23 TOTAL AVAILABLI FUNDING 6,640,000 7,471,000 7,708,000 0,234,000 0,620,000 I 10,918,000 10,377,000 13,723,000 23 -••--••.... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ............ 11PENDITURII I ............ I 21 Share of Joist Works Treatment Plant 42,000 95,000 71,000 69,000 38,000 I 322,000 135,000 157,000 21 25 District Collection System 126,000 591,001 414,000 447,050 1121#1000 I 2,866,000 17,114,800 20,610,000 2S 25 Other Ixpeadlturee 20,000 130,000 I 151,000 159,000 26 ........... ........0.. ........... ........... .......... I ........... .......0.... ............ 27 TOTAL 11111DITURDB 196,D00 116,000 $62,000 516,000 1,256,000 I 3,346,000 17,941,900 21,295,000 21 ........... ....0...0.. ........... ........... .......... I ........... ............ ............ 21 Reserves 6 Carry-over to Nest Year 6,111,000 6,658,000 7,146,000 7,710,000 7,572,000 7,572,000 17,572,0001 17,572,0001 21 SCHEDULE A SCNEDU COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ND. 13 April 13,1980 STA71HIXT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 3 FISCAL TEARS 190E-OB THROUGH 1995-97 1992-93y INS 1987-69 1900.09 1589-90 1990-91 1991-92 I 5-Tear Total 1996-97 10 Year Total LINK ... ....... ............. ---- BOND FUNDISI l ...........- 29 Reserves 6 Carry-Over Iron Last Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?9 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ REVENUE I 30 Tax Levy 0 10 31 Interest S Nlscellaneous INwne I 0 0 31 32 Other lame I 32 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ 33 TOTAL RIVINUI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ 31 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ------------ ------------ IIPINDITURIS ------------ 35 Bond Principal A Interest I 0 35 36 Other Ixpeadltures I 36 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ 37 TOTAL EIPINDITURIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ 30 Reserves 6 Carry-Over to Next Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 39 Next Year's Dry Period funding Regulrexents 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ 10 Fund Balance or IDeflcltl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 SUNNART (Adjusted for Inter-fund Transferal I 11 Reserves 6 Carry-Over Pros Last Year 6,175,000 6,594,000 6,807,000 7,200,000 7.809,000 6,175,000 7,577,000 6115,000 11 12 TOTAL REVENUE 617.000 1,123,000 1,174,000 1,241,000 1,290,000 5.505.000 4,161,000 9,665,000 12 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ 13 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 6,852,000 7,717,000 7,981,00D 8,521,000 9,099,000 11,680,000 11,730,000 15,811.000 13 11 TOTAL RIPINDITURIS 258,000 910,000 701,000 712.000 I.M.000 4,103,000 21,050,000 25.161,000 11 ......I...I ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ 15 Reserves 6 Carry-Over to Next Year 5,594,000 6,807,000 7,280,000 7,809,000 7.577,000 7,577,000 19,320,000) 19,320,000E 15 16 Next fear's Dry Period loading Regulrenents 31.000 47,000 70,000 90,000 113,000 133,000 228,000 228,000 /6 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ 17 FUND BALANCE OR DIFICITI 6,563,000 6,760,000 7,210,000 7,711,000 7,414,000 7,111,000 19,518,000E 15,542.0001 17 a nnnwv a SCHEDULE US ♦1 COUNTY SANITATION DISIIICT 10. 13 April 15,1988 STATININT OF PIOIICIID CASH KIDS Page 1 PISCAL YEARS 1907-80 THROUGH 1991-97 1992.931 LINK 1907-08 1980-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 5-fear Total 1996.97 10 Year Total LINI .... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ------------ ------------ ------------- ---- OPIIATIIG IUD -------------- I Reserves A Carry-Over Prot Last Year 119,000 1501000 159,000 175,000 196,000 119,000 123,000 149,000 1 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ RIVINVI 2 Share of It Tam Allocation I 0 0 2 3 User Bees 51,000 92,000 141,000 204.000 276,000 I 160,000 31116,000 3,804,000 I 1 Interest a Miscellaneous Intone 12,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 15,000 I 63,000 63.000 1 5 Other Revenue I 0 0 5 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ------------ 6 TOTAL RIVIIDI 61,000 103,000 15$,000 LIMON 293,000 I 831.000 3,11E.000 1,941,000 6 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ------------ 7 TOTAL AVAILABLI FUIDIIG MICOO 153,000 311,000 392,000 IBI,DDD I 910,000 31339,000 11056,000 7 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ............ IIPINDITUIIS I 1 Share of Joist works N a 0 42,000 71.000 113,000 161,000 231,000 I i21.000 2,316,000 3,172,000 8 9 Collection system N A 0 and Other Oper. 20,000 23,000 26,000 30,000 34,000 I 133,000 261,000 394.000 - 9 10 Other Ilpenditnres I 0 0 10 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ------------ I1 TOTAL IIPINDITUIIS 52,000 94,000 135,000 196,000 266,000 I 757,000 31109,000 11866,000 11 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ............ 12 Reserves A Carry-Over to Next Year 150,000 159,000 175,000 156,000 223,000 I 223,000 230,000 230.000 12 13 Meet leer's Dry Period loading Requirement, 31,000 (1,000 70,000 96,000 131,000 I 131,000 228.000 228,000 13 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ------------ 11 load Balance of (Deficit) 119,000 112,000 105,001 98,000 90,000 I 90,000 21000 2,000 II User tee for Slagle Family Residence $70.00 178.40 117.81 198.11 1110.15 1194.12 User Fees increased 12% per year starting 1988-89 All Sent tees deposited into Operating Pond Connection lees set at $1500 for all zones starting 1901-09 SCHEDULE E A SCHEDULE B COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 April 18,1980 STATSNBNT Of PROJECTED CASH PLOW Pale 2 FISCAL YEARS 1901-89 THROUGH 1996-97 199Z-931 LINE 1987-80 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 S-Year Total 1996-97 10 Year Total LINE .... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ------------ ------------ ------------- ---- 15 Reserves 6 Carry-over from Last Year 6,026,000 6,m,000 6,778,000 11394,000 81103,000 6,026,000 8,105,000 6,026,000 IS ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ............ ............ ............ REVENUE 16 Construction Giants 3,000 3,000 3,000 16 17 Pees: Colnecton 142,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 675,000 2,812,000 3,375,000 6.217,000 11 IB User Pees 0 0 IB 19 Other I 0 0 19 20 Sale of Capacity Rights 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 8,000 11,000 5,000 19,000 20 21 Interest 6 Xlscellaosous Income 411,000 169,000 502,000 519,000 575,000 I 2,566,000 300,000 2,866,000 21 22 Other Income 0 0 22 23 TOTAL REVENUE 614,000 1,150,000 1,178,000 1,225,000 1,250,000 9,125,000 3,680,000 9,105,000 23 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ------------ ------------ 21 TOTAL AVAILABLE FAILING 6,610,000 7,591'000 7,956,000 8,619,000 9,361,000 11,451,000 11,785,000 15,131,000 21 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ IIPENDITURES I ------------ 25 Share of Joint Narks Treatment Plant 12,000 95,000 78,000 69,000 30,000 322,000 135,000 457,000 29 26 District Collection System 126,000 591,000 401,000 147,000 1,210,000 2,066,000 17,814,000 20.680,000 26 27 Other Expenditures 20,000 130,000 I 158.000 159,000 27 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ 20 TOTAL IIPBNDITURIS 196,000 016,000 562,000 515,000 1,2S6,000 3,346,000 17,949,000 21,295,000 28 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ 29 Reserves 6 Carry-over to Next Year 6,414,000 6,778,000 7,394,000 8,103,000 8,105,000 0,105,000 (61164,0001 16,164,0001 29 ----------- ----------- -----::::.. :..:::,..:: -:::-::::: I scxeouLe e COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 April 10,1960 STAT6NINT 01 PIOJICT6D CASE FLON Page 3 FISCAL 19ARS 1997.81 THROUGH 1996-97 1991.93/ LINT 1907.08 1901-69 1989.10 1990-91 1991.92 5-tear Total 1396.97 10 Year Total LINK .... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ------------ ------------ ............. .--- BOND YHNDIS) I ............ 30 Reserves R Carry-Over tree Lut Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ............ ------------ 11VIIVI I 31 111 Levy I 0 31 32 Interest A Nbaellueuus moose I 0 0 32 33 Other Insole I 33 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ------------ 31 TOTAL RIVINVI 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I """'---- -"""---- ---------_-- 35 TOTAL AVAILABLI PONDING 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 15 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ............ IIPINDITU118 l ............ l 36 Bond Principal 6 Interest l 0 36 37 Other Ixpenditures l 31 7 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ........... ............ ............ 30 TOTAL 11PIRDITURIS 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 IF ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... 1 ........... ............ ............ 39 Reserves L Carry-Over to But Year 0 0 0 0 a I 0 0 0 39 10 Neat Year's Dry Period Fuoding legolreiests 0 0 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 10 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... 1 ----------- ............ ............ ' 11 Tend Blleeee or IDelltitl 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 41 EMIT IAdlisted for later-toad Transferal I 12 leiereel 6 Carry-Over Yrol List year 6,175,000 6,594,000 6,931,000 7,569,040 8,299,000 6,175,000 1,326,000 1,175,000 12 63 TOTAL NIVII01 677,000 1,253,000 1,333,000 1,442,000 1,551,000 6,256,000 6.796,000 13,052,000 63 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ 81 TOTAL AVAILABLI IUNDING 6,052,000 1,047,000 0,270,000 9,011,000 9,050,000 I 12,431,000 15,124,000 19,227,000 99 15 TOTAL IIPINDITURIS 258.000 910,000 701,000 712.000 1,522,005 1,103,000 21,050.000 25,161,000 15 ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ............ ............ 16 Reserves A Carry-OVer to Next far 6,594.000 6,937,000 7,569,000 8,139,000 8,320.000 1 0,320,000 15.914,0001 15,934,0001 16 U Next fear's Dry Period leading Requlreeeots 31,000 67,000 10,000 93,000 131,000 I I31,000 228,000 226,000 61 ......... ........... ........... ........... .......... I ----------- ------------ ------------ IB - FORD BALANCI 01 IDNEICITI 6,563,000 6,890,000 1,499,000 0,201,000 8,195,004 l 8,155,000 16162,0001 (6,162,0001 91 SCHEDULE S l SCHPA� COONTI SANITATION DISTRICT 00, 13 April 11,1911 STATISTS? OF PROMISED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL VMS 1967-19 TRIOUCR 1996-91 1992.931 LINT 1917.61 1951-61 1919.90 1990.91 1591-92 5-Tear Total 1196.91 ID year Total LIII .... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ---------..- OPIIAIING FUND I -------------- I I Reserves 6 Carry-Over 1ms Leal Test 149,000 156,000 66,000 97,000 111,000 149,000 1$7,000 149,000 1 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... l ........... ------------ ............ IIVINOI I 2 Share of It Ter Allocation I 0 0 2 3 User Fees 51,000 2,000 161,000 229,000 303,000 I 741,000 '3,337,000 4.086,000 3 1 literati a Miscellaneous lacole 12,000 1,000 6,000 1.000 12,060 I 16,000 46,000 1 5 Other levenue I 0 0 5 ........... ........... ..._...... ...--...... ........... I ........... ............ ..---------- a TOTAL 1IVINUI 63,000 10,000 170,000 237,000 315,000 I 195,000 3.331,000 1,132,010 6 • ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... I ----------- ............ .-..-..--.-. 7 TOTAL AVAILAILI FUNDING 212,000 160,061 236,010 334,100 453,000 I 144,000 3.521,000 11201.100 7 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............ IIPINDITURIS I ............ 1 Share at Joist Mort$ N 6 0 42.000 71,000 113,000 166,000 232,000 624,000 21111,004 3,472,000 1 9 Collection Sysles N 6 0 aid Other Oper. 20,000 23,010 26,000 30,000 34,000 I 133,000 261.600 39/.010 1 10 other llpeodlturea I 0 0 10 ...... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............ 11 TOTAL 1111MDITUIIS 62,000 94,100 131,000 196,000 266,000 1 757.000 3.109,000 MUCOUS OUS II ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............ 12 Reserves 6 Carry-Over to Nett Year 150,000 66,000 11,000 136,000 167,000 I 107,000 IIS.001 415,000 12 13 Next Year's Dry Perlod Findley 1e0uirements 31,000 17,010 70,000 16,000 133,000 I 133,000 226,000 221,000 13 ........... ........... ........... ........... ...._..... ........... ............ ------------ 11 Pond Sellers or IOeficitl 119,000 19,000 27,000 40,000 51,000 I 51,000 117,000 111.000 1/ Supplemental User Fee for Single laoily Residence $10.00 111.00 1100.60 1120.16 1715.15 $361.10 Portion Of User Fees deposited into capitol toads User fees increased 20% per year starling 1981.39 Conaectiao Fees set it 11500 for all :ones stattiog 1918.99 SCHEDULE C r SCUE�, CDON71 SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 April 18,198E STATININT 0P PIOJICTID CASH ILON Page 2 IISCAL IIA19 1987-88 70I000N 1996-97 199b9)/ LINT 19B7-85 1991-89 1989-90 1990.91 1991.92 5-fear Total 1996.97 10 Year Total Lips .... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ------------ ............ ------------- ---- IS Reserves A Carry-over Area Last fear 6,026,000 6,111,000 6,815,000 7,199,000 6,238,000 1,026,000 8,313,000 61026,000 15 IIV6N08 ........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............ ............ 1 16 Construction Gren[e 3,000 I 3,000 3,000 16 17 Fees: Conaectioa 142,000 675,000 675,000 675.000 675,000 I 2,842,000 3,375.000 61217,000 17 IS seer lean 97,000 22,000 64,000 1 183,000 1,893.000 2.071'000 l8 19 Other I 0 0 19 20 Sale of Capacity Rights 1,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 8,000 I 14,000 1,000 11.000 I0 21 Interest a Nisceliamous Income 471,000 169,600 510,000 557,000 584,000 I 2,S91,000 380,000 2.971,000 21 22 Other Income I 0 0 22 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... I ----------- ............ ------------ 23 TOTAL Revenue 611,000 1,217,000 1,116,000 1,255,000 1,331,000 I 5,633,000 51655,000 11,286,OD0 23 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... I ---------- ............ --•--------- 21 TOTAL AVAILABLI PRICING 6,640,000 7,691,000 1,061,000 0,754,000 9,569,000 I 11,659,000 13,960,000 17,311,000 21 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... I ........... ............ ------------ IIPINDITVIBS I 25 Share of Joint WAR Treatment Plant 12,000 95,000 16,000 69,000 38,000 I $22,000 135,000 I17,000 25 26 Oletrlc[ Collection Sptea 126,000 591,000 184,000 117,000 1,218,000 I 2,666,000 17,11I,000 20,6601000 26 27 Other tlpeoditures 18,000 130,000 1 158,000 08.000 21 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............ 28 TOTAL RIPINOITURIS 156,000 016,000 562,000 516,000 1,251,000 3,346,000 17,949,000 21,295,000 28 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............ 29 Reserves 6 Carry-over to Nest Tear 6,414,000 1,675,000 7,459,000 8,238,000 6,313,100 1,311,000 13,381,0001 13,581,0001 29 SCHEDULE C SCHEDULE C COUSIN SAM17ATION DISTRICT 00. 13 April 16,1188 STAUNINT OF PROJECTED CASH PASS Page 3 FISCAL FEARS 1987-38 7HROUGR 1996-97 1992-931 LINT 1901-88 1908-69 1589-90 1990-91 1991.82 I 5-lear Total 1996-97 10 Year Total LINE .... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... I ------------ ............ ------------- ---- BOND FUND181 30 Reserves 6 Carry-Over troi Lest year 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 1 ----------- .......0.... ------------ RIVINDI 31 Tax Levy 0 31 32 Internet 6 Nlseellaneoua locose 1 0 0 32 33 Other Incase I 33 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 1 ----------- ------------ ------------ 31 TOTAL RIVINUI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 1 ........... ............ ------------ 35 TOTAL AVAILABLI FORDING 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 35 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... I ........... ............ ------------ 11FINDITURIO I 36 load Principal 1 Interest 0 36 37 Other lipeadltures I 37 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... I ........... ............ ------------ 3N TOTAL IIPINDITOAIB 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 31 .......0... ........... .0.0....... ........... .......... I ........... ............ ............ 39 Reserves A Cury-Over to Next MARC 0 0 0 a 0 I 0 0 39 10 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requireaents 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- I ----------- ------------ ............ 11 fund Balance or (Deficit) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /1 SUMMARY (Ad3oeted for Inter-Fuad Transferal 17 Reserves 6 Carry-Over Been Last fear 4,175,000 6,591,000 1.941,000 7,596,000 6,371.000 I 6,17S,000 81500,000 6117S,000 12 13 TOTAL RIVIN01 677,000 1,251,000 1,356,000 1,432,000 1,646,000 6,128,000 8.992,000 15,uo.000 13 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... 1 ----------- ------------ ------------ 11 TOTAL AVAILABLI FUNDING 1.852,000 7,651,000 8,297,000 9,086,000 10,022,000 I 12,603,000 17,492,000 21,595,000 10 15 TOTAL RIPIMOITURIS 256,000 510,000 701,000 712,000 1,522,000 I 4,103,000 21051,000 25,161,000 15 ........... ......0.... ........... ........... ........... 1 ........... ------------ ------------ 16 Reserves 6 Carry-Over to Next Year 6,S91,000 6,911,000 7,596,000 0,116,000 000,000 1 81500,000 11,%6,0001 13,566,0001 16 17 Hart fear's Dry Period Fuodlag lequlresents 31,000 11,000 70,000 91,000 131,000 I 133,000 228,000 221,000 17 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... I ----------- ------------ ------------ 10 FUND BALAMCI OR IDIFICITI 5,563,000 6,894,000 7,526,000 8,278,000 81361,000 1 01367,000 13,791,0001 13,794,0001 Is SCHEDULE C COONTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 1118186 MIDDLE Of CAPACITY PURCNASES IN DISTRICTS' COLLECTION SYSTEMS Projectl0uning Districtslall TOTAL 1907.86 1988.99 1989.90 1990.91 1991-92 1992-93 1993 6 Beyond ........................... ........... I ----------- ........... ----------- ----------- ........... ----------- .....--...... I Santa ADD River Interceptor (2) 5,995,000 I 121,000 (23,000 332,000 263,000 369,000 410,000 4,052,000 I Soutb Santa Ana River Interceptor (2) 902,000 110,000 I40,000 66,000 209,000 303,090 I Ricbfield Subtrunk 121 39,000 1 7,000 32,000 1 Kellogg Subtrunk 121 24,000 1 21000 5,000 3,000 14,000 1 Isperial Interceptor 12) 45,000 1 16,OOo 11000 25.000 1 Taft Interceptor (2) 316,000 I 42,000 22,000 46,000 48,000 150,000 I Carbon Canyon Interceptor 121 6,OB1,000 1 372,000 5.715.000 I Fullerton-Brea (2)• Oreagetborpe 12 6 31, I Knott i Iaterplant (2, 3 6 11) I Interceptors 3,136,000 1 346,000 21790.000 I Sunflover 6 District 7 Interceptors (1,7 4,131,000 I 160,000 709,000 159,000 2,795,000 ........... I ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- GRAND TOTAL 20,680,000 1 126,000 $91,000 184,000 117,000 1,218,000 1,650,000 15,964,000 MEETING DATE Ylpril 25, 1988 TIME 7v30 P•m• DISTRICTS 13 - Yorba Linda SILIF Tall DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS (EDGAR I........HOESTEREY..._ _ _ (DAVIS)............ARNOLD...... (CRANK)........HANSON...... _ _ (PICKLER)..........BAY......... (YOUNG)........GRISET...... _ _ (MURPHY)...........SIGONGER...._ _ (ROTH).........STANTON..... _ _ (WORRY)............CATLIN...... (PLUMMER)..........COX......... DISTRICT 2 (PERRY)............CULVER...... (KENNEDY)..........EDGAR....... (NORBY)........CATLIN......_ _ _ (WINCHELL).........ERSKINE..... (FLORA)........MAHONEY..... _ _ (MC CONE)..........GRIFFIN..... (PICKLER)......BAY......... _ _ (YOUNG)............GRISET...... (MURPHY).......SIGONGER...._ _ _ (CRANK)............HANSON...... (YOUNG)........GRISET...... _ _ (COX)..............HART........ (NELSON).......LEPTON...... _ _ (EDGAR)............HOESTEREY..._ (SCOTT)........NERL........ EDGAR)............KENNEDY..... (TYNES)........NEWTON...... _ _ (NELSON)...........LEYTON...... (CULVER).......PERRY....... _ (FLORA)............MAHONEY..... (FASSENDER)....SILZEL...... _ (PLUMMER)..........MAURER...... (PEREZ)........SMITH....... _ (GREEN. P).........MAYS........ (ROTH).........STANTON..... _ _ (AGRAN)............MILLER. S..._ (BIGONGER).........MURPHY...... DISTRICT 3 (SCOTT)............NEAL........ _ (SUTTON)...........NELSON...... (HERMAN).......POLIS ......- _ _ (TIMES)............NEWTON...... (WEISHAUPT)....SAPIEN......_ _ _ (CULVER)...........PERRY....... (DAVIS)........ARNOLD......_ _ _ (HERMAN)...........POLIS....... (PICKLE R)......BAV......... _ _ (STANTON)..........ROTH........ _ (NORBY)........CATLIN...... (WEISHAUPT)........SAPIEN...... (PERRY)........CULVER...... _ _ (WILES)............SIEFEN...... (WINCHELL).....ERSKINE..... _ _ (FASRENDER)........SILZEL...... (MC CUNE)......GRIFFIN..... (PEREZ)............SMITH....... _ (YOUNG)........GRISET......_ _ __ _ _ (ROTH).............STANTON..... (FLORA)........MAHONEY..... (NELSON)...........SUTTON...... (SCOTT)........NEAL........ _ _ (MILLER. 0)........SWAN........ _ (SUTTON).......NELSON...... (BERNAL)...........SYLVIA...... _ (WILES)........SIEFEN......_ __ _ _ (GREEM.H/JOHNSON)..WAHNER......_ (ROTH).........STANTON....._ _ _ ((LIFT)............WILSON...... _ (BERNAL).......SYLVIA......_ (CLIFT)........WILSON......_ STAFF. DISTRICT S SYLVESTER... ✓ BROWN.......�� (COX)..........HART........ _ _ ANGERSON...._ (PLUMMER)......COX......... _ _ CLARKE...... (STANTON)......ROTH........_ _ _ CLAWSON..... DAWES.......j� DISTRICT 6 DEBLIEuz...._ HODGES...... (JOHNSON)......WAHNER......_ _ _ KYLE........ (PLUMMER)......MAURER......_ _ _ LINDER...... (STANTON)......ROTH........ _ _ OOTEN....... STREEO......�� DISTRICT T VON LANGEN WINSOR...... (KENNEDY)......EDGAR......._ (AGRAN)........MILLER, S..._ (PLUMMER)......COX........._ (YOUNG)........GRISET......_ (STANTON)......ROTH........_ (PEREZ)........SMITH......._ (GREEN. H).....WAHNER......_ _ _ OTHERS:_ WOODRUFF.... IDE......... DISTRICT 11 HOHENER..... HOWARD...... (GREEN. P).....MAYS........_ _ _ HUNT........ (WINCHELL).....ERSKINE....._ _ _ KEITH....... (ROTH).........STANTON....._ _ _ KNOPF....... LINDSTROM..._ DISTRICT 13 LYNCH....... STONE....... (BIGONGER).....MURPHY...... _ _ YOUNG....... (PICKLER)......BAY......... (STANTON).......ROTH........ (PEREZ)........SMITH.......�� (NELSON).......SUTTON......=e= `/ DISTRICT 14 (AGRAN)........MILLER. S.. (MILLER. D)....SWAN........_ (EDGAR)........KENNEDY....._ (STANTON)......ROTH........_ (PEREZ)........SMITH....... DISTRICT 13 ADJOURNED MTG. NOTES - 4/25/88, Yorba Linda City Hall N3 - Staff report on master-planned sewerage facilities for serving Dist. 13 The General Manager reported that District 13 does not own any sewerage facilities themselves. They must buy capacity in other sewers to transport to the Huntington Beach or Fountain Valley treatment plant and they own a share of the joint works for treatment and disposal facilities. Tom Dawes then addressed the Board and reviewed proposed development within the District. He said District 2 is working on a new line in Euclid Avenue and District 13 will buy a very small percentage of that line. It is a very economical way to get sewage conveyance facilities to serve the District. There are no facilities that will be owned by District 13. Director Bay asked if the tax assessment money comes straight back to the Sanitation Districts. He was told, no, the District receives a connection charge when new development occurs. Those funds are used to purchase capacity from the District that owns the lines. He then reviewed the various connection charges. The District has agreements with the cities to collect the connection charges and the city keeps 5% for their services. The General Manager added that when the District was formed in 1985 to resolve the dispute over tax exchanges for newly annexing property, proposed AB 8 Agreement providing that District 13 would not receive any share of the ad valorem property tax allowed under Proposition 13. Historically, the Sanitation Districts have received 3% of the 1%. Districts 13 8 14 receive no ad valorem taxes. Current connection fees range from $250 to $1,500 per �.s dwelling unit. The cost of sewerage service is rising dramatically because of environmental standards. He reported that staff had prepared some scenerios to maintain the District's solvency. N4 - Staff report on long-range financial program Gary Streed then reviewed the three cash flows all of which essentially follow the same format. He reviewed in detail Schedules A, B & C. Director Bay asked where staff obtained the data re proposed development. Gary advised from Master Plans and from the various City planning staffs. Bay added that his city had some extensive growth approved in the East Anaheim Hills area. Did that follow previous projections received? Tom Dawes replied that the developers don't pay the fees until they take out a permit. He advised that staff did talk to the City staff and got our projections from them. Bay then asked what happens when growth excells more rapidly than predicted? Can we use connection fees for operating if we want to? Was told yes. Instead of looking at a high percentage of user fee increases, could up the connection fees and put that cost upfront and have a lesser user fee for the people after they come in. The initial cost of buying a home in Anaheim Hills Includes a tremendous amount of money. We are trying to upfront that money more and more. He said he preferred a $2,500 connection fee rather than have someone move in his city and have a 20% increase in user fees over the next 10 years. If the District gets that upfront money and banks it, they don't have to worry .... so much re growth projections and can get interest on the money. Smith commented that that was fine but if everybody puts money up front, it cuts out so many more people from buying a house because that cost goes into the house. The General Manager added that the alternatives presented on the goldenrod schedule on annual increases in user fees, shows no increase in connection fees. However, we will be coming to the Directors annually to consider increasing that fee. We can guarantee the cost of sewage service is going to go up. With regard to accellerated development, District 13 is somewhat unique. Most Districts need to build sewers way in advance of their needs. District 13 needs only to buy capacity and only, as needed. They will have collected the connection fees when they need to buy capacity. Will come to Directors annually with an update on financial projections and submit for their consideration annual fee schedules. What is presented now re capital financing is the worst-case scenario. Projections continue to be delayed. Director Bay commented that projections only show single family residential charges. Do commercial charges go up proportionally? What could we charge the proposed new jail? Tom Woodruff replied that right now public entities are exempt. The District could adopt a fee, not more than the cost of service. He said some of the water and sewer agencies have done studies re these types of users that put a heavy load on a rather small quantity of land. High density. We are empowered to establish a fee that would reflect the costs to us. It was pointed out that 3,000 beds are proposed for the first stage of the new jail . The General Manager advised that they would pay the user fee but would be exempt from connection fees at this time. Director Murphy stated he thought Schedule B is the better way to go. Should pay user fees and then up the connection fees later on. He so MOVED that this schedule be incorporated in proposed Ordinance No. 1303. MOTION SECONDED by Roth. Roth stated he didn't think user fees should be used for capital expenses. Bay added that if you select Schedule B, the first reading of the Ordinance sets the numbers. Staff replied yes. He then asked if they could still amend the ordinance re fees for the jail? TLW replied yes. Via) & (6)(a) - Re Ordinance No. 1302 & Ordinance No. 1303 Tom Woodruff reported that staff was presenting two different ordinances. All of the other Districts have two ordinances. Right now District 13 only has one. When the District was formed, they elected to put all the fees in one ordinance. Staff is recommending that the fees be split because that is the way the staff and the cities are used to operating. Possibly later in the year we may opt to draw all the fees into a separate area in all the new ordinances. Ordinance No. 1302 is for the connection charges and No. 1303 is for user charges. Director Bay commented that historically the Districts have provided in their ordinances that governmental agency facilities are exempt from connection charges so they don't pay capital costs. Does this include school Districts? Was told yes, they would be exempt. Re Ordinance No. 1303, Bay asked, we may want to amend it and provide for connection fees for governmental facilities. Don Smith stated that this would be an entirely new procedure for the Districts if we start charging governmental facilities connection fees. He wandered if this isn't something that shouldn't be discussed by the Executive Committee first before each Board starts to do this. This is a dramatic change and don't want to go off half-cocked. The General Manager advised that this has been given consideration previously by the Executive Committee on several occasions. Two years ago was the most ...� recent. They recommended continuation of the current policy at that time. -2- Roth asked, can we approve ordinances and then amend these ordinances at a later time? Was advised yes. Bay agreed there should be a little more study here. He asked if the jail was ever considered by staff? Tom Dawes said no, the jail wasn't proposed when the fees were originally considered. Bay added that the future commercial projections are amazing. This area is not going to all be residential . Todd Murphy thought maybe Gary should prepare a Schedule D adding sewer costs and additional capital costs for a 3,000 bed jail (Phase 1) and then 6,000 beds. Smith stated you can't just pick out a jail and charge only them. Tom Woodruff reported that there is a lot of State Legislation on this subject. The San Marcos case provided that you can't impose any fees on governmental agencies, and now that has been set aside, which reinstates the Board's ability to assess capital charges. Preparing a new ordinance will entail work to determine which governmental agencies really put a load on the Districts. The School Districts were challenged by San Marcos. The best way is to be able to defend the ordinance. Need to decide if every governmental agency should pay so much per square foot such as an airport or city hall. A jail or prison is a different ballgame. Smith suggested this matter be referred to the Executive Committee to study at its next meeting on May 4th. Directors agreed. The General Manager stated that it was staff's understanding that the Directors wished to include the figures from Schedule B in Table A of Ordinance No. 1303. The Directors replied yes, that was their desire. Director Bay asked if the District could change their ordinances later regardless of the Executive Committee's action. Tom Woodruff replied yes, this District has an obligation to pay into the joint funds. Bay added that he would like to see an amended first reading at the May Board meeting adding charges for services for a jail that size in this District. He said he didn't think other taxpayers should have to pay because they didn't plan ahead. He commented that when this is taken to the Executive Committee, they would find differences of opinion depending where they are from. He just wanted to make sure this District has the power to set this up and wants the charges defensible regardless of what they decided to do. -3- II -1/2 • w ' I , I i III it �I l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 F ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �..J MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING April 25, 1988 - 7:30 p.m. Yorba Linda City Hall - Council Chambers 4845 Casa Loma Avenue Yorba Linda, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of April 13, 1988, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Todd Murphy, Chairman, Ben Bay, Don R. Roth, Don E. Smith and John Sutton DIRECTORS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, V..� Rita J. Brown', Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes and Gary G. Streed OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Review of master-planned sew e ra a The staff briefly reviewed the current acilities to serve District No. 13 and proposed master-planned sewerage facilities' capacity needs of the District, as well as development projections for the District. It was pointed out that District No. 13 does not own any sewerage facilities itself. The District must buy capacity in other Districts' sewerage facilities to transport the wastewater to the treatment plants in Fountain Valley or Huntington Beach. It also purchases a share of the joint works for treatment and diposal of wastewater. Purchasing capacity in other Districts' lines is a very economical method for District 13 to transport their wastewater. The Directors discussed proposed development projects within their respective cities and pointed out that more commercial development was occurring than originally envisioned within District No. 13. Staff advised that they work closely with the various city Planning Departments to develop their projections and use the most current general plan information in preparing the master plan of sewerage facilities. 4/25/88 District 13 �..i date on long-range financial The General Manager reported that during ro ram and consideration of the tax exchange negotiations with the amendments ROE connect on County of Orange, which ultimately led charge and sanitary sewer service to the formation of District 13 in 1985, charge programs an agreement was executed providing that District 13 would not receive any share of the ad valorem property tax allocation allowed under Proposition 13. Accordingly, the Directors set the annual user fee at $70 per building, higher than the fee in other Districts since no property tax revenue would be received by the District. At the same time, connection fees were established in three zones: $220 for properties which had paid annexation fees (to annex territory to Districts 2 or 7 which were later included in District No. 13 as part of the formation proceedings) $1,250 for properties in District No. 13 which could be served by gravity and $1,500 for properties requiring pump stations for sewerage service. Mr. Sylvester pointed out that although the costs of operating and maintaining the joint treatment facilities have increased each year because of more stringent water quality regulations by the EPA and the state, and increasing costs of materials, supplies and sludge disposal , the user fee in District 13 has not changed. The budgeted Joint Operating cost per million gallons has increased from $277 in 1984-85 when the District was formed to $370 in the 1987-88 budget. This trend is expected to continue as expanded and more complex facilities are placed into service to meet state and federal requirements. �.d It was further noted that all of District 13's capital funds have come 'from annexation fees transferred during formation and connection fees received since. These capital funds pay for the District's share of joint treatment works construction, the purchase of additional equity/capacity in the existing joint treatment facilities as flows increase and purchase of capacity rights in the collection facilities of Districts 1,2,3,6 and 7, as needed, to serve District No. 13. As future projections for the construction of joint treatment facilities include several rehabilitation/reconstruction and advanced treatment projects which benefit all users, not only new development, he advised that it would now be appropriate to include a capital charge in the user fee to help fund these projects that benefit all users. This practice is followed by other Districts and assures that new development pays its appropriate cost for sewerage system capacity to serve the development and that all users pay their fair share of costs for operating, maintaining and rehabilitating the facilities used to provide them sewerage service. Gary Streed, the Acting Director of Finance, then reviewed three alternative 10-year financial projections. Each financial scenerio was based on different assumptions. The first reflected the results of maintaining the existing user fee program for the next ten years. This schedule showed a small operating deficit as early as 1990-91 which continues through the ten-year period totaling $2.0 million by 1996-97. Capital funds are sufficient for the first five years, but there is a $7.6 million deficit by the end of ten years. Mr. Streed further reported on a second alternative and reviewed the effects of increasing the user fee 12% each year and raising the connection fee to $1,500 for those properties which did not pay annexation fees. User fees would not be -2- 4/25/88 District 13 allocated to the capital funds under this alternative. He advised that a 12% annual increase was sufficient to pay the escalating costs of sewerage service and maintain a positive fund balance in the operating fund for both the five and ten-year planning periods. However, a capital fund deficit of $6.2 million would still be experienced during the second five-year period. Another alternative was reviewed which provided for a 20% increase in the user fee each year while raising the connection fee to $1,500. User fees available after budgeting a 20% contingency reserve fund balance in the operating fund would be allocated to the capital funds for construction/reconstruction of facilities benefiting all users. Staff projected a reduced capital deficit in 1996-97 of $4.0 million under this plan. It was pointed out that all three scenarios reflect a capital funding deficit at the end of the ten-year period based on a connection fee of $1,500 per dwelling unit. However, it is expected that the connection fee will continue to increase to pay the cost of sewerage system capacity to serve new development. Staff anticipated that they would be submitting a recommendation for new connection fee rates beyond the $1,500 amount to the Boards of all Districts next year upon completion of the new facilities' Master Plan now underway which will determine such new costs. Staff further commented that the estimates can be considered "worst case" scenarios because there are several unknowns that will have a major impact on the District's cash flow requirements. Accordingly, staff reiterated that the District's financial condition will be evaluated annually and appropriate recommendations submitted for the Board's consideration. Staff then reviewed existing and recommended fee schedules for 1988-89 for consideration by the Board. The Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion of the various options available to them to provide the necessary funding to meet the District's future needs, and the alternatives and relationship of fees for capital versus operating, maintenance and rehabilitation in the District's financial program. Several Directors expressed their concern over the provision in the Districts' uniform "Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities" that exempts local governing agencies from connection fees for sewerage system capacity. (Federal and state agencies are charged the connection fee. Governmental agencies are not exempt from annual user fees which pay the cast of operating, maintaining and rehabilitating the sewerage system.) The concern expressed was that by exempting local public facilities, particularly large ones, from paying the capital costs, the burden was unfairly shifted to the residents and private businesses of the District, thus increasing the fees that they would have to pay. After considerable discussion of possible alternatives for resolving this issue, including revising the connection fee ordinance to provide some sort of equitable payment schedule for governmental agencies, it was the concensus of the Board members that the matter of local agency connection fee exemptions should be referred to the Executive Committee for review at their next meeting on May 4, 1988. -3- 4/25/88 District 13 With the understanding that a revised ordinance could be considered at a later date, the Board indicated their desire to proceed with the first reading of the proposed user fee and connection fee ordinances, as follows: Existing Proposed 1987-88 1988-89 Fee Fee ANNUAL USER FEE Single-Family Dwellings/Condominiums $70.00/building $78.40/dwelling unit Multi-Family Dwellings/Apartments $70.00/building $47.04/dwelling unit Commercial/Industrial/Other (government $70.00/building $56.12/1,000 sq. ft. buildings, utilities, nonprofit organizations, etc.) ONE-TIME CONNECTION FEE Zone A Residential $ 220 $ 220 Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $ 45/1,000 sq.ft. $45/1,000 sq.ft. Zane B Residential $1,250 $1,500 Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $250/1,000 sq.ft. $300/1,000 sq.ft.' Zone C Residential $1,500 $1,500 Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other $300/1,000 sq.ft. $300/1,000 sq.ft. First readin of ro osed It was moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1 That Ordinance No. 1302, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1301 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1302 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1302, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1301 Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be `...� introduced, and passed to the second reading on May 4, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. -4- 4/25188 District 13 First reading of proposed It was moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1303 That Ordinance No. 1303, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Sections 703, 704, 705 and 706 of Ordinance No. 1301, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is hereby, waived. Fallowing the reading of Ordinance No. 1303 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1302, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1301 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Repealing Sections 703, 704, 705 and 706 of Ordinance No. 1301, be introduced, and passed to the second reading on May 4, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting.so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., April 25, 1988. Secretary, board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California -5- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 .2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Adjourned Regular Board Meeting of District No. _LS held on Q as 19Of was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the District's offices on , 19-n. IN /WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this \ � day of 19-U. Rita S. Brown, Secretary of t1e Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. IR of orange county, California