Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-04-28 District 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 9127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 108"ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92709-7018 (714)992-2011 April 22, 1987 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 6 TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1987 - 7: 30 P.M. COSTA MESA CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of April 8, 1987 , the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date to review the status of the District's Master Plan of trunk sewers and rehabilitation projects, and to consider revisions to the District's long-range financial program. Secretary BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: "DISTRICT No. 5 540 962-2411 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1987 - 7:30 P.M. COSTA MESA CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS (1) Rojll qa (2) Verbal status report on the District's sewer rehabilitation program and Master Plan of facilities to serve the District. (3) Consideration of items re long-range financial program: (a) Staff report on supplemental user fee program and preliminary cash flow projections. (b) Discussion (c) Consideration of actions relative to Ordinance No. 611, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Pertaining to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (1) Report of General Counsel re proposed ordinance. (2) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 611, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Pertaining to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . (3) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. 611, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Pertaining to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and pass to second reading on May 13, 1987. (4) Other business and communications, if any (5) Consideration of motion to adjourn p � I BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Dlatriats Pmt Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area DISTRICT No. G 9622a 14 11 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1987 - 7:30 P .M. COSTA MESA CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS (1) Roll call (2) Verbal status report on the District' s sewer rehabilitation program and Master Plan of facilities to serve the District. (3) Consideration of items re long-range financial program: (a) Staff report on supplemental user fee program and preliminary cash flow projections. (b) Discussion (c) Consideration of actions relative to Ordinance No. 611, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Pertaining to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (1) Report of General Counsel re proposed ordinance. (2) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 611, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Pertaining to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) . ( 3) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. 611 , An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Pertaining to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and pass to second reading on May 13 , 1987. (4) Other business and communications, if any (5) Consideration of motion to adjourn MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts Post OfNca Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis AvenueFountain Valley, Calif., 92708 iTalaPFmes: Me Coda 714 DISTRICT NO. 6 9a2-2411 K*MM'S REPORT TO DISTRICT NO. 6 DIFWrCRS MEETI DATE: APRIL 28, 1987 Item No. 2: Status Re rt gn District's Sewer Rehabilitation Program and Master Plan of Facil>.t ea to Serve the District The staff will update the Directors as the status of the District's sewer rehabilitation program and Master Plan of Sewers. Item No. 3: Update on Mono-range Financial Program and Consideration of Amendments to E~xisturanS atary Sewer Service Charges Background In 1983 the Board approved the following fee schedule to help fund the Districts' financial needs: Single-Family Multi-Family Comnercial/Ind/ Effective Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other Date One-time Connection $500 $500 $100 per 1,000 sq. April 8, 1983 Fee ft. of building Annual User Fee $26.40 per $15.85 per $18.90 per 1,000 July 9, 1983 dwelling unit dwelling unit sq. ft. of building This long-range financial program of oonnection fees to finance facilities expansion and supplemental user fees to make up the shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues was established to provide the additional financing required for both operations and major rehabilitation. During the public workshops and hearing held in 1983 to present the District's proposed user fee program to its constituents, the public was advised that the initial user fee schedule was expected to increase substantially in the second year (1984) of the program to cover rising costs,- and then remain at the increased level for several years. The District was able to delay any increase in both the oonnection fee and supplemental user fee until last year due to a significant decline in inflation rates, receipt of favorable bids on various District and joint works construction and rehabilitation projects, all of which reduced District expenditures below previously anticipated levels. In 1986, however, changes in use restrictions and the taxable status of major properties in the District resulted in lower ad valorem tax revenues to pre-1984-85 levels and -..I.. necessitated increases in the District's fee structure to maintain the financial 4/28/87 integrity of the District's capital and operating funds over the next five years. The following table presents the District's current fee schedule: Single-Family Multi-Family Camnercial/Ind/ Effective Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other Date One-time Connection $1,500/ $1,500/ $300 per 1,000 sq. Sept 12, 1986 Fee Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit ft. of building Annual User Fee $29.04 per $17.04 per $20.79 per 1,000 July 1, 1986 dwelling unit dwelling unit sq. ft. of building During last year's budget deliberations and the Board's consideration of issuance of Certificates of Participation with several of the other Districts last summer, the Board directed staff to incorporate an increase of 10% per year into the District's cash flow projections for supplemental user fees. In addition, the Board increased the one-tine connection fee to the above amounts in lieu of issuing long-term debt certificates. Schedule A (attached) reflects both the fee increases adopted by the Board last summer as well as an annual 10% increase in supplemental user fees over the next ten years. Staff recommends that the Board consider maintaining the 10% increase in supplemental user fees in 1987-88 as approved by the Board last year, and adopt the following fee schedule for fiscal year 1987-88: Annual User Fee $31.68 per $19.02 per $22.68 per 1,000 July 1, 1987 dwelling unit dwelling unit sq. ft. of building Ordinance No. 611 (attached) incorporates the proposed fee schedule and is presented for consideration by the Directors. No change in the connection fee schedule is reornmended at this time. Staff will review the District's Master Plan of trunk sewer projects, the attached cash flow projections, the proposed supplemental user fee increase and the proposed Ordinance with the Directors in greater detail at the meeting. -2- EIGHT SANITATION DISTRICT No. 6 SCEIC)ULLE ! ^1 ` STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASK FLOM 4/22/81 ❑SCAT YEW 1996-87 IXAWM 1995-96 INI-92J LIRE 1906-87 1917-08 1908-89 1989-90 1990-91 5-Mv Total 1995-96 M-yar Iota a; .... ------- ------- ------- ....... ....... ------------ ----------- ------------- OPMAIING FIND 1 Reserves{Carry-Orer Free last Year 1.949.ROD 1,971.AND 2.127,M0 3.191,SM 2,131,000 ; 1.949,0M 1,122,OM 1.949,M0 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... REVIDUE 2 MAP To of IS Be Aliooation 1,031,0M 1.1N,DM 1,237,001) I,3SS.000 1,181.01M) 6,236,01411 10,512,000 16.778,MM 3 Fen 640.00 IS3,M0 0M,M0 911,M0 I.002.001) i 4.134,11M 6,726,00 IO.BM.OM M Interest{Miscellaneous 1Meee 139,000 185,oM IS3,M0 156,M0 148,000 135,OM 0 735,00 5 Other Reveae 0 0 ----------- ----------- ......----- ----------- ----------- - ----------- ----------- ----------- 6 TOTAL REVENUE 1,810,000 2,021,01) 2,210.M0 2,4M,MO 2,6M,M0 i II,IOS,MO 17.260,OM 28,S73,M0 ----------- ------- .-...--. ........... ----------- ----------- ----------- 7 TOTAL AVAIIMLE FUNDING 3,759,00 3,991,00 0,315,00 4,613,00 8,768.OM i 13.054,00 19,190,00 301322,e41, ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... . ........... ---------- ----------- ENPINDITIIRES 8 Share Of Joint Works A 1 0 1,631,0M 11719,0,10 1,977,0110 2,216,000 2,615,00 10.216,000 N,276,M0 30,/92,011he 9 Collation Sysam N 1 0 and Other Doer. 157,000 152,M0 175.OM M1.M0 231,OM 916,OM 1,7951000 2,711,M0 10 Other ENperoiiures 0 0 .1......... ........... ........... ........... ........... . ........... ........... ........... 11 lain EXPENDITURES 1,9M,M0 1,071,000) 2,152,OM 2,075.00 2,166,000 11,132,0111 22,071,41h0 13,203,00 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ...-.....-- - ----------- ----------- ----------- 12 Reseras 6 Carry-Over to Most Year 1,971,M0 2,127.00 2,193,000 2,131,00 1,922,000 1.922,M0 (2.MI,MO) (2,181,000) 13 Net Year's Oral Period Funoin9 WhiMa ote 894,M0 936,M0 1,076,M0 1,2A.OM 1,023,00 1,623,00 2,392,000 2,392,01h) ........... ........... ........... ........... ------- , ----------- ----------- -----.--..- le FAA a11ae or (Deficit) 1,017.m 1.191.OM 1,111.M0 Mo,OM 199,o00 i 8N,M0 (5,213,M0) (S,273,M0) mizzmzz aPIML FUIID(S) --------------- ) IS Reserves 1 Carry.oar FMm last far 5,159,M0 8,112,M0 e,IM,MO S31.Me (2.3M,OM) i 5,159,M0 (2,819,0M) 5,159,M0 ........... ........... .......... ........... ----------- , ------------ -------I--- ----------. REVIDUE 16 Gonis 129,00 374,000 02,0M 191,000 891,0M ! 1,567,00 513,00 2.1e0,000 17 Fa6: Connection 842.00 768,00 N1,M0 261,00's 231,000 2,319,000 1,170,M0 3,569,OM 11 Other 695,00 684,MD 515,000 SN,OM 659,00 ; 2,9B2,M0 4,430,MO 7,412.M0 19 ale of Capacity Rights 17.000 206,M0 12, M 12,0M $89,00 M6,OM 819,M0 1,655,0M M Internet G Miscel lanepus IMMe SM,Me 320,M0 166.0M 0 0 812,000 0 812,OM 21 [Nit,Sale to D SWCt 14 1,MB,OM I,071,00 1,078,000 N FIee-OaM Equity Adjustmnt 0 0 23 am, laeee 80,0M MO.Mp BM,OM ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ....... ----------- ........... .......---. 26 TOTAL RESIDUE 3,117,M0 2,352,00 1,096,01,0 I,M6.M0 1,973,M0 i 10,4",MO 6,N2,M0 17,676,000 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ----I-----I ----I------ 25 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 6,876,0M 7.226.M0 5,244,11110 1,1117,000 (357,0M) ) IS,a3,M0 4.513.Mo 2216351000 ........... .......... ........... .-.._.---- -----•----- , ----------- ----------- .---------- EXPEMDITURES 26 Share of Joint Works Tres Meat Plant 2,MS,OM 2,954,000 6,602.000 a,MB,OM 1,947,000 ! 16.176,M0 976.00D 17,152,000 21 District Collation$ysta Ms,MO 1N,M0 105,00 125,000 115,00 852,M0 2.MS,MO J,1SI.O0 21 Pointer seaent Agreement PaaatR 1 0 N Flgm-used Trott, Adjustment 1101,000 I.Da.MO I,Oa,MO M Other Iroaditura o 0 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 31 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4.004,000 3,076,01)0 8,707,011 4,213,000 2,M2.Mo 18,062.Mo 3.281,M0 21.363.GM --------'-- ----------- ---'-------- ----------- ........... I ----------- ----------- ----•------ 32 AeseTres{ar.rare, to Pont Year 4.672,000 4,I41,040 531.000 (2.3311.00) (2,419,000) i (2,419,00) I,N2,000 I,m,0M ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ • ---...:... ........... --------.-- SC HEDULE A Eage 2 4/22/87 I1 1991-91/ LINE 1916-81 I91I-0 IM-19 IWING 1110.91 5-Yur TREAT 1995-96 10-Yur FOUR ------------ 33 Be.".A C.",-Our fr0e Last Yur 40,00 2/,1410 0 0 0 ! 10,000 0 10,000 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... . -------_.. ----------- .------...- REVIEW 34 The to, 16,10 16,00 Ifi'm 35 Interest B N5sceIRaneas 1.. 2,100 1 0 0 0 2,000 0 2.000 36 Other Ircoa 0 _......... .......... ....._.... .......... ..._.------ i ----------- ----------- -------.--- 31 TOTAL REVENUE III'm 1 0 0 0 I I0,000 0 ls,000 ........... ........... ........... ........... ----_----- , ----------- ----------- ........... 3S IDEAL AV41LULE ROBINS O,WO 2/,000 0 0 6 O,WO 0 5a,0DD .......... ........... •------ --- ----------- -------- r ----------- ----------- ----------- EXPENDITURES ------------ 39 Bad Prioc5al B let erl.t J1,00 2/,OeO 58,010 5B4O0 40 Other Ea0lndiluree ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... . ........... ........... ........... 11 Total EXPNDITNES 31,00 21,W0 0 0 0 ) 50.00 0 SA,WO ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 12 10ol.Vee A tarr,ba, to But Yur 21,000 0 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 U Nut Var's BY,WrEM FUMia RaaireanU 21,W0 0 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 ........... .........— —-----.-.- ...-------- ........... , ----------- ----------- ----------- AN Rare UUwe or (Deficit) 0 0 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 SUMMARY (AdjustM IOr In[p-ROM Transfers) 45 Reserves t Larry-Our fro. Last Vote 1,118,00 6,8/0,000 6,215,00 2,1W,00 (191,001 ) 1,101,00 (691,00) ],ISI,OW 16 TOTAL REVENUE 5,545,01HO 4,319,W0 3,316,0110 3,166,W0 4,6W,OW i 21,641,W0 21,260,000 15,861,000 ........... ........... ........... ..'-------- ---------- , ----------- ----------- ..--------. O IDEAL AVAILABLE ENDING 12,693,000 11,249,000 9,99,00 6,496,00 0,011,00 ) 21,155.00 23.763,000 53,015,00 Se TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,03,0W 4,911,W0 6,69,w 6,W,W0 1,9W,OW 29,2S2,0W 25.352.00 5"hosi' 0 ........... .........— ----------- ----------- --------... , ----------- ----------- ------.---- 19 Rlsprees B W,-Over to Nest tar 6,810,OW 6,215,00 2,10,000 (I",W ) (491,000) ) (091,00) 11,5a9,W0) (I,Sa9,W0) W Neat Yews Dr3 Verirc Forcing AeaeireunU 921,OW 936,00 1,016,W0 1,231,00 I,423,00 1,123,000 2,392,000 2,3n.m --.----.--- -1......... ........... ........... ........... . ........... ........... ........... 51 ROD BALANCE OR (DEFICIT) S,919,W0 S,MON 1,651,000 (1,130,00) (1,920,000 ) (1,90,00) (;01,00) (3,9al,00) ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... . ........... ........... ........... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 19.6 SCHEDULE S SCHEDULE Of DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSIEN PROJECTS 4/21/81 PROJECT TOTAL C.LP. 1987-88 Tom 89 1989-90 I990-91 1911-92 1992-91 1993-94 Radio Linked Ielewet, (a) IMOD 10.000 Coast Trunk Force Harris' I. Bitter Point Pulp Station to Newport Blvd, 5 FIAT I11 la)e 73,000 56.000 11,000 2. NDwpPrt Blvd. to Back Bay 5-29 IS)(.)- 130,000 2,000 IB.000 55,000 55.000 I. Santa Ana River to Bitter Point Pulp Station (3) file 150.000 20,000 65,000 65,000 N. ROckv Point to Newport Blvd. ($both Side) (3) (a) 90.000 I 20,000 10.000 S. Bitter point Pulp Sta. Upgrade it)(,)- 23.000 20,600 3,000 6. Rocky Point Pulp Sta. Upgrade (3) (a)r 24,000 24,000 ni5cellaneoos Projects (a) 175,000 25.000 25.000 25,000 25,000 25.000 25.000 25,000 ........... ----------- ----------- ------- -_ --- _------ --- ........... ........... ._-------- Subtotal AIR fund 675,000 18,000 97,000 60.000 100,000 90,000 90,000 45,000 95,000 ----------- ----------- ----------- ---- ------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Fairview Trunk Serer ra 01 (b) 1.154,000 29,000 25,000 500,000 3.000,000 200,000 fat rvi ew Road, Baker Street (3) FBI to Wilson Street 2,000.000 2.000.000 Miscellaneous Injects Ib) 175,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25.000 25,000 25400 25,000 Sub-fatal AN Fund 2,175.000 0 25.000 25,000 25.000 25.000 25,00 25,00 2,025,000 ........... ----------- ----------- ----------- --. ------- ----------- ----------- ----------- __------- BRAND TOTAL 2,850.000 18,000 122,000 105.000 125.000 115.000 115,000 10.000 2,120.000 (a) Fully Funded I. Na5ler-planned facilities presently under construction (LI Partially Funded 2. MaSLnrplanned facilities presently under design (cl Not funded 3. Has Far pIaMed facilities PhBd,lAd to, future desigolionstruction r Partially paid by District 5 Partially Daid by Districts i and le RE ; AGENDA ITEM NO. 3(c) ORDINANCE NO. 611 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COONiY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMNDING ORDINANCE NO. 609 PERTAINING TO SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follois: Section 1: Table A, as adopted by Section 2 of Ordinance No. 609, is hereby amended to read as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance. Section 2: This Ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption by a vote of two-thirds of the members of the Board and its publication, as provided in Section 3. Section 3: The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation of the District as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California TABLE A Basis of Minimum Annual Charge Annual Rate Charge Per Unit Single-Family Charge per $31.68 $31.68 Dwellings dwelling unit Multi-Family Charge per 19.03 19.03 Dwellings/Mobile dwelling unit Hanes Cannercial/ Charge per 1,000 22.68 22.68 Industrial/other square feet of (government building buildings, utilities, non-profit organizations, etc.) Condominiums: Condominiums are considered single-family dwellings. However, in recognition of the limited potential use of smell, converted dwelling units, the owner of a single unit may apply for a reduction of the annual rate from $31.68 to $19.03, provided the unit has less than 11 plumbing fixture units (determined as follows): Fixture Units Assigned by Uniform Building Code Single bath with tub, water 7 Fixture Units closet and wash basin Kitchen with sink and/or 2 Fixture Units dishwasher Laundry facilities 2 Fixture Units 11 Fixture Units Camiercial/Industrial: To recognize buildings in this classification where the use of the sewer system my not be directly related to the size of the building such as in a warehousing type of use, any owner of a single building nay apply for a reduction of the calculated fee to a minimum annual fee of $19.03, provided said building contains less than 11 plumbing fixture units (as determined above). MEETING DATE 'April 28, 1987 TIME 7.30 P•m•DISTRICTS 6 (COSta Mesa City Hell) DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS (EDGAR)........HOESTEREY..._ (PICKLER)..........BAY......... (CRANK)........HANSON...... _ _ (FRIED I............BIGONGER...._ (YOUNG)........GRISET...... (NORBY)............CATLIN...... ' (ROTH).........STANTON..... (RISHER)...........CLIFT....... (PLUMMER)..........COX......... _ DISTRICT 2 (PERRY)............CULVER...... (KENNEDY)..........EDGAR....... _ (NORBY)........CATLIN...... (MC CONE)..........GRIFFIN..... _ (WEDEL)........MAHONEY....._ __ _ _ (YOUNG)............GRISET...... (PICKLER)......BAY......... (CRANK)............HANSON...... (FRIED)........BIGONGER...._ _ _ '(COX)..............HART........ (YOUNG)........GRISET...... (EDGAR)............HOESTEREY..._ (NELSON)...:...LEYTON...... (CORONADO).........KANEL....... (SCOTT)........NEAL........_ _ __ _ _ (WINCHELL).........KELLY....... (DOWNEY).......NEWTON...... _ _ (EDGAR)............KENNEDY..... (CULVER).......PERRY....... _ _ (NELSON).,,........LEYTON...... _ (FASBENDER)....SILZEL...... (WEDEL)............MAHONEY..... _ (PEREZ)........SMITH....... _ _ (PLOWER)..........MAURER...... (ROTH).........STANTON..... _ _ (GREEN, P).........MAYS........ (ABRAM)............MILLER, S..._ DISTRICT 3 (BIGONGER).........MURPHY...... (SCOTT)............NEAL........ (HERMAN).......POLIS ...... (SUTTON)...........NELSON...... (WEISHAUPT)....SAPIEN......_ _ _ (DOWNEY)...........NEWTON...... (PICKLER)......BAY........._ _ _ (CULVER)...........PERRY....... _ (HORSY)........CATLIN...... _ (MERMAN)...........POLIS....... (RISHER).......CLIFT....... _ _ (WEISHAUPT)........SAPIEN...... (PERRY)........CULVER...... _ _ (WILES)............SIEFEN...... (MC CONE)......GRIFFIN..... (FASBENDER)........SILZEL...... (YOUNG)........GRISET......_ _ __ _ _ (PEREZ)............SMITH....... (CORONADO).....KANEL....... (ROTH).............STANTON..... (WINCHELL).....KELLY....... (NELSON)...........SUTTON...... (WEDEL)........MAHONEY..... _ _ (MILLER, 0)........SWAN........ (SCOTT)........NEAL........ _ _ (SELVAGGI).........SYLVIA...... _ (SUTTON).......NELSON...... _ _ (GREEN,H/JOHNSON)..WAHNER..:..._ (WILES)........SIEFEN...... (ROTH).........STANTON..... (SELVAGGI).....SYLVIA......_ DISTRICT 5 SYLVESTER... V CLARKE...... (COX)..........HART........ _ _ DAWES.......yG (PLUMMER)......COX......... ANDERSON...._ (ROTH).........STANTON..... _ _ BUTLER......JL BROWN....... DISTRICT 6 BAKER....... KYLE........ (JOHNSON)......WANNER...... JL- VON LANGER (PLUMMER)......MAURER...... c% _ WINSOR...... (ROTH)..........;ANi6M.....✓ _1(_ _ STREED...... CLAWSON..... DISTRICT 7 OOTEN....... LINDER......J� (KENNEDY)......EDGAR......._ DEBLIEUX...._ (ABRAM)........MILLER, S..._ _ _ TALESI...... (PLUMMER)......COX......... _ _ ROLL........ (YOUNG)........GRISET...... _ (PEREZ)........SMITH....... (ROTH).........STANTON....._ _ _ OTHERS: WOODRUFF...._ (GREEN, H).....WANNER......_ _ _ �_ ATKINS....... DISTRICT 11 HOHENER..... HOWARD...... (WINCHELL).....KELLY....... _ _ HUNT........ (ROTH).........STANTON....._ _ _ KEITH....... (GREEN. P).....MAYS........_ _ _ KNOPF....... LINDSTROM..._ DISTRICT 13 LYNCH....... YOUNG....... (NELSON).......SUTTON......_ (BIGONGER).....MURPHY...... _ _ _ (PIREZ)........BAY........._ _ _ ,`_ -^` wJ�+�R"_ (PEREZ I........SMITH......._ _ _ -yidANQ-1' (ROTH).........STANTON....._ DISTRICT 14 r (AGRAN)........MILLER. S..._ _ (MILLER. D)....SWAN........ (EDGAR)........KENNEDY....._ (PEREZ)........SMITH....... (ROTH).........STANTON..... 04/09/87 ° COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE CouRry, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING April 28, 1987 - 7:30 p.m. Costa Mesa City Hall 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of April 8, 1987, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Costa Mesa City Hall Council Chambers. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. In the absence of the Secretary, Rita J. Brown, Chairman Wahner appointed J, Wayne Sylvester Secretary pro tan. The roll was called and the Secretary pro tan reported a quorum present. DIRECTCRS PRESENT: James Wahner, Chairman, Philip Maurer, Don R. Roth DIRE)CTlORS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, William H. Butler, Thammas M. Dawes, John Linder OTHERS PRESENT: Don R. Griffin, Joint Chairman, Rob Hamers x x x x x-x x x x x x x x x x x x x Review of Master Plan of Trunk The Director of Engineering reviewed the Sewer System status of the District's sewer rehabilitation program and the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers to serve the District's needs. The lower portion of District No. 6 is drained by trunk sewers in Dover Drive and Newport Boulevard which empty into the Pacific Coast Highway Trunk Sewer System, which is jointly arced by District No. 5 and District No. 6. For several years the two districts have been involved in a major rehabilitation program designed to upgrade the dual force main system in Pacific Coast Highway. Currently, the Districts are reconstructing the reach between Rocky Point PLmp Station and a crossover located westerly of the Arches (Newport Boulevard). When this project is completed, the Districts will have finished rehabilitation of one of the twin barrels of the joint Districts 5 and 6 Coast Highway Trunk from the treatment plant in Huntington Beach to the Upper Newport Back Bay, which will greatly increase the reliability of the force main system. The next project will include rehabilitation of the second force main beginning at the crossover westerly of the Arches and extending to the upper Newport Back Bay. It is estimated that this work will cost $2,350,000.00. Over a portion of the force main between Orange Street westerly to Old Newport Boulevard �...� (at the Arches), the City of Newport Beach has under design a street improvement -1- District 6 04/28/87 A project for Pacific Coast Highway. The project is being administered by the City and funded by CalTrans. The City has retained Hobert Hein, William Frost and Associates to design the project. District's staff has held an informal discussion with the City as to the advisability of including the replacement of the sewer pipe within that reach so that the street improvements will not be disrupted. The City has indicated a willingness to do so, particularly if the District can stay within their schedule. In addition, the District has contacted CalTrans to see if permits could be issued on a fast track to accommodate this cork. They, too, indicate they could acoamiodate the project. The first phase of rehabilitation of the second barrel of Pacific Coast Highway Force Main will be incorporated within the limits of the City's contract. The second phase from Newport Boulevard to Upper Newport Back Hay will be done under separate District contract at a later date. Mr. Dawes also reviewed the status of the master planned facilities for serving the upper portion of District No. 6. Preliminary design is under way for a new trunk sewer to be jointly constructed and vaned by Districts 6, 7 and 14 and District 6's share of the cost of that facility is estimated to be $1.8 million. In addition, the District 6 Master Plan includes a new sewer in Fairview Road, at an estimated cost of $2 million, that will parallel the existing Fairview Trunk Sever which drains the northerly half of District No. 6. Update on Long-Range Financial The Director of Finance reported that in Program and Consideration of 1983 the Board approved the following fee Amen&rents to Existing Sanitary schedule to help fund the Districts' Sewer Service Charges financial needs: Single-Family Multi-Family Camercial/Ind/ Effective Fee Type Residential Residential C,overnmantal/Other Date One-time Connection $500 $500 $100 per 1,000 sq. April 8, 1983 Fee ft. of building Annual User Fee $26.40 per $15.85 per $18.90 per 1,000 July 9, 1983 dwelling unit dwelling unit sq. ft. of building This long-range financial program of connection fees to finance facilities expansion and supplemental user fees to make up the shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues was established to provide the additional financing required for both operations and major rehabilitation. During the public workshops and hearing held in 1983 to present the District's proposed user fee program to its constituents, the public was advised that the initial user fee schedule was expected to increase substantially in the second year (1984) of the program to cover rising costs, and then remain at the increased level for several years. The District was able to delay any increase in both the connection fee and supplemental user fee until last year due to a significant decline in inflation rates, receipt of favorable bids on various District and joint works construction and rehabilitation projects, all of which reduced District expenditures below previously anticipated levels. In 1986, however, changes in use restrictions and the taxable status of major properties in the District resulted in lower ad valorem tax revenues to pre-1984-85 levels and necessitated increases in the District's fee structure to maintain the financial integrity of the District's capital and operating funds over the next five years, as follows: -2- District 6 04/28/87 1 Single-Family malti-Family Commercial/Ind/ Effective Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other Date One-time Connection $1,500/ $1,500/ $300 per 1,000 sq. Sept 12, 1986 Fee Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit ft. of building Annual User Fee $29.04 per $17.04 per $20.79 per 1,000 July 1, 1986 dwelling unit dwelling unit sq. ft. of building During last year's budget deliberations and the Board's consideration of issuance of Certificates of Participation with several of the other Districts, the Board directed staff to incorporate an increase of 10% per year into the District's cash flow projections for supplemental user fees. In addition; the Baird increased the one-time connection fee to the above amounts in lieu of issuing long-term debt certificates. Mr. Butler reviewed the long-range financial projections for District No. 6 and recommended that the Board consider maintaining the 10% increase in supplemental user fees in 1987-88 as approved by the Board last year, and adopt the following fee schedule for fiscal year 1987-88: Single-Family Yolti-Family Commercial/Ind/ Effective Fee Type Residential Residential Governmental/Other Date Annual User Fee $31.68 per $19.02 per $22.68 per 1,000 July 1, 1987 dwelling unit dwelling unit sq. ft. of building No change in the connection fee schedule is recommended at this time. First reading of proposed It was moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 611 carried: That Ordinance No. 611, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Pertaining to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 611 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 611, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Canty Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Pertaining to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be introduced and passed to the second reading on May 13, 1987, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's administrative office. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of ty Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared th meeting 'ourned at 8:07 p.m., April 28, 1987. . � Sec e , Board of Directors C ty its 'on District No. 6 of 0 t California -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Adjourned Regular Board Meeting of District No. (O held on a7-p , 1987 was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the District' s offices on c 2. , 1987. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of �Q. 1987. Rita�ecretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. A of Orange County, California