HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-04-28 District 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
J • P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714(962-2411
April 22, 1987
NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICT NO. 5
TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1987 - 4:30 P.M.
NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL - COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of April 8, 1987,
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 will
meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date
to review the status of the District' s Master Plan of trunk sewers
and rehabilitation projects, and to consider revisions to the
District' s long-range financial program.
secretary
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
TelephoMa:
DISTRICT No. 6 A g540-290
a22 1rea Cod. 14
7I _ _
AGENDA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1987 - 7 :30 P .M.
COSTA MESA CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
(1) Roll call
(2) Verbal status report on the District' s sewer rehabilitation
program and Master Plan of facilities to serve the District.
(3) Consideration of items re long-range financial program:
(a) Staff report on supplemental user fee program and
preliminary cash flow projections .
(b) Discussion
(c) Consideration of actions relative to Ordinance No. 611,
An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 609 Pertaining to Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges: (Copy enclosed with agenda material)
(1) Report of General Counsel re proposed ordinance.
(2) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 611,
An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Pertaining
to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, by title only,
and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must
be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors
present) .
( 3 ) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance
No. 611, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Pertaining
to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and pass to
second reading on May 13 , 1987.
(4) Other business and communications, if any
(5 ) Consideration of motion to adjourn
t
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts Post Office B. 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708
Tele*F :
Am Code 714
540-2910
,.I DISTRICT NO. s 962-24111
MNAU'ER'S REPOfY7' 7V DISTRICT NO. 5 DIRMTORS
MEETING DATE: APRIL 28, 1987
Item No. 2: Status Re rt on District's Sewer Rehabilitation Program and Master
Plan of Facflit es to Serve the District
Rehabilitation of the Balboa Trunk Sewer System
The District has completed an engineering investigation of the Balboa Trunk Sewer System,
built in 1943, extending from the Lido Pump Station at Short Street and Newport Boulevard
to the A Street Pump Station at Balboa Boulevard. The system includes approximately
12,700 feet of 15-inch to 24-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) and about 40 manholes. The
entire line was inspected by video-tape.
The Directors will recall that a significant portion of the wastewater collected and
transported from the Balboa Peninsula is seawater which infiltrates into both City and
District sewers. One of the objectives of the investigation was to determine the
condition of the line so that corrective measures could be remanded to insure the
structural integrity of the line as well as to reduce seawater infiltration. The
inspection shows that nearly all of the infiltration into the District's line is at the
joints rather than from failure of the pipe between the joints. Clay pipe joints
installed forty years ago do not include the leak-proof techniques incorporated in
today's compression seals. Small sections of the pipe were also observed to be cracked
and these can be easily repaired.
The consultant that conducted the study, Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates
believes that the majority of the leaks can be repaired by chemical grouting. It is
estimated that the grouting will cost about $110,000. However, the manholes are in worse
condition, and reconstruction is recommended. The manhole reconstruction would include
about 10 feet of new pipe on each side and at each side entry where the pipe is generally
in poor condition. Staff estimates that the manhole reconstruction will oast about
$390,000. Total project cost for rehabilitation of the Balboa Peninsula Trunk is now
estimated at $500500. Staff is proceeding with solicitation of engineering proposals
for preparation of plans and specifications for this project.
Rehabilitation of the Pacific Coast Highway Force Main System
The Directors will recall that for several years we have been conducting a major
rehabilitation program designed to upgrade the District's backbone dual force main system
in Pacific Coast Highway which has suffered several breaks in the past. Currently, the
District is reconstructing the reach between Rocky Point Pump Station and a crossover
.,.� located westerly of the Arches (Newport Boulevard). In addition, repair of the force
main system from Lido Pump Station at Short Street to Pacific Coast Highway is included
[ w
4/28/87
in the contract. When this project is ompleted, the District will have completed a
rehabilitation of one of the twin barrels extending from the treatment plant in �..e
Huntington Beach to the Upper Newport Back Bay. This will greatly increase the
reliability of the force main system.
Staff is reommending that the next project include rehabilitation of the second force
main beginning at the crossover westerly of the Arches and extending to the Upper Newport
Back Bay. It is estimated that this work will cost $2,350,000. Over a portion of the
force main, between Orange Street and Old Newport Boulevard, the City of Newport Beach
has under design a street improvement project for Pacific Coast Highway. The project is
being administered by the City and funded by CALTRANS. The City has retained Robert
Bein, William Frost and Associates to design the project. District staff has held an
informal discussion with the City as to the advisability of including the replacement of
the sewer pipe within that reach so that in the future, newly improved street
improvements will not be disrupted. The City has indicated a willingness to do so
particularly if the District can stay within their schedule. In addition, the District
has contacted CAL.TRANS to see if permits could be issued on a fast-track to accamgdate
this work; they too, indicate that they could acmnmdate the project.
Accordingly, staff is reommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to
negotiate with the City's designer, Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, to prepare
plans and specifications, in two phases, for the reconstruction of the second force main
in Pacific Coast Highway. The first phase will be incorporated within the limits of the
City's contract; the second phase under separate District contract at a later date could
include reconstruction from Orange Avenue easterly to the Upper Newport Back Bay.
Down-Coast Area
The Irvine Company and other interested parties have contacted staff regarding sewage
service for the dawn-coast area. Staff will brief the Directors and provide an update on
the latest development plans and the District's master plan of facilities for serving the
area at the Board Meeting.
Item No. 3: Update on the District's Long-range Financial Program
Background
In 1981, the Board adopted a supplemental user fee program to make up the shortfall of
ad valorem tax revenues and provide needed additional financing for operations and major
rehabilitation work on the sewer system.
When the program was originally presented to the public and adopted by the Board, it was
anticipated that it would be necessary to increase the fees by approximately 77%
beginning with the second year to finance the rehabilitation cork on the trunk sewer
system. The District has been able to delay any increase in the supplemental user fees
originally adopted in 1981 as well as its connection fees due to a significant decline in
inflation rates, receipt of favorable bids on various District and joint works
construction and rehabilitation projects, and delays in various major plant projects, all
of which have reduced District expenditures and cash flow requirements well below
budgeted levels.
-2-
4/28/87
In addition, on the revenue side of the budget, the turnaround in econamic conditions and
the resultant new construction and resale activity over the past few years have resulted
in a significant increase in the assessed valuation of properties which has generated
additional ad valorem tax revenues for the District. Further, the formation of District
14 resulted in the District receiving approximately $2,000,000 from the new district's
purchase of capacity in the joint treatment and disposal facilities. The positive
financial impacts of District 14's formation on District 5 were also reinforced by the
Joint District's concurrent shift to a 100% flow-based method of allocating ownership and
each district's share of joint treatment works construction costs which further reduced
District 5's share of the joint works construction costs.
Schedule A (attached) presents the District's projected financial condition over the next
ten years based on the current fee schedules. This preliminary cash flow projection
indicates that the revenues generated by the District's current supplemental user fee
schedule in combination with the District's higher ad valorem tax revenues will be
sufficient to fund 100% of the District's operating expenses for the next ten years.
Schedule B (attached) presents the District's schedule of trunk sewer projects for the
next seven years.
The cash flow projections also indicate that the District's projected revenues from
connection fees, Federal and State grants, sale of capacity rights to the Santa Ana
Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) , interest and miscellaneous inccme, income resulting
from the formation of District 14 in January, 1986, and contributions from developers for
planned development for the down-mast area of the District will not provide sufficient
capital funds to finance the projects defined on Schedule B over the next ten years due
to increased joint treatment facility construction requirements, but the District remains
financially healthy on an overall basis.
Supplemental User Fees
The following fee schedule has been in effect since 1981:
Single Unit Parcels
Connected Meter Size Annual Fee
1" or less $ 26.40
A" 52.50
2" 105.00
3" 210.00
4" 420.00
6" 840.00
8" 1,680.00
If parcel contains more than one water
meter, then the charge applicable to each
meter shall be added together, and the
sum levied against the parcel.
Multi-Unit Parcels
Per Unit $15.85
-3-
1 �
4/28/87
During the past year the staff and General Counsel met with the California State Water
Resources Control Board's Revenue Program Specialist to review the status of the
Districts' Revenue Program, the long-range financial plan adopted by the Joint Boards in
April, 1979 to amply with federal and state construction grant program regulations. The
State Board representative has indicated that the water-meter-size fee basis used by
District No. 5 for supplemental user fees is not acceptable to the State Board. The
state prefers a fee basis similar to that in effect in District No. 6 which establishes
flat fees for single and multi-family residences and fees based upon square footage of
improvements for commercial, industrial, governmental and other facilities.
Therefore, staff is recamiending that the Board consider changing the existing water-
meter-size-based fee structure to a flat fee and square footage-based fee similar to the
fee structure adopted by District No. 6 in 1983. Using the current District No. 5 base-
line, the following table outlines the proposed fee structure for 1987-88 for each user
class:
1987-88
Class of User Basis of Charge Annual Rate
Single-Family Charge per Dwelling $26.40
Dwellings/Condominiums Unit
multi-Family Charge per Dwelling 15.85
Dwellings/Apartments/ Unit
Mobile Homes
Commercial/ Charge per low 18.90
Industrial/Other Sq. Ft. of Building
(government
buildings,
utilities,
non-profit
organizations,
etc.)
Implementation of the proposed supplemental user fee modification will generate approxi-
mately $46,000 in additional revenue each year. This additional income is reflected in -
Line 3, Fees, on Schedule A.
In the event the Board wishes to consider the change from a water-meter-size to a
flat/square-footage-based user fee schedule, Ordinance No. 516 has been drafted which
includes the reammended change to a flat/square-footage-based supplemental user fee
based on the reammennded fee schedule presented earlier in the report.
Staff will review the status of the District's Master Plan, attached schedules, the
proposed supplemental user fee modification and the proposed Ordinance in greater detail
with the Board at the meeting.
\/
-4-
4/28/87
Connection Fees
The costs for planning, design and construction of master-planned collection, treatment
and disposal facilities to accommodate increased flows are continuing to increase. As
pointed out above, there is a projected capital revenue shortfall. Therefore, staff is
recommending that the Board consider raising the District's existing one-time connection
fee as presented in the following table:
Existing Fees
Single/Multi-Family Comnercial/Industrial,/
zone Dwelling Units Governmental/Other
1 $250 per dwelling $130 per 1,000 square feet of building
2 $850 per dwelling $440 per 1,000 square feet of building
3 $1,250 per dwelling $2,000 per 1,000 square feet of building
Reomuended Fees
1 $500 per dwelling $260 per 1,000 square feet of building
2 $1,100 per dwelling $570 per 1,000 square feet of building
3 $1,500 per dwelling $2,400 per 1,000 square feet of building
In the event the Board wants to consider the above recommended charges, staff has drafted
Ordinance No. 517 which incorporates the recommended connection fee changes.
-5-
COUNTY SANITAIIN DISTRICT NO. 5 SCHEDULE A
$IAI[NEXT Of PAODCTED CASH FLUID 4/23/8]
FISCAL YEARS I' AT THRMH 1995-96
1991-921
LINE 1986-87 LIB1-88 19BB S9 1989 90 1990-91 S-Year Total 19%-96 109eae total
.... ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ...--------- ----------- -- ----------
OPERAIING FWD
--------------
I Reserves I Carry-Over irch Last Year 2.093.000 2,813,000 3,813,N0 4.935,000 6,2k,OW 2.094.000 I,)N,NO 2,013,000
REVENUE
2 she'.01 It TV.All at,.. 1.920,000 2.248.OW 2.632,N0 3.081,FRO 3.607,NO 13,1e1,N0 29,666,aW g151,W0
S fees 108,000 192,OW 832,000 811,W0 919,W0 1,125,0011 5,434,000 9,559,W0
1 Interest 1 NiseYllaneovs IWN. I15,W0 236,oW $10,000 S%,OW 196,ON 1,613,OW 4.245,000 51868,000
5 Other Revenue 0 0
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...... .... ...........
6 TOTAL REVENUE 2,03,N0 3,216,0W 3,111,000 6,351,0O0 5,022,000 19.226,000 39,335,000 58,%I,WO
1 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 1,896,000 6.119,000 1,581,N0 9.286.00 11,258.000 21,319,000 11,085,oN 60,651,N0
----------- ---- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
EXPENDITURES
0 Share of Joint Perks N 1 0 1,555,W0 1,133,OW 1,993,000 21292,000 2,636,000 10,209,000 2OL,ULOW W,611,000
9 Collection Syste.A I 0 and Other Doer. 49e,W0 SI3,OW 659,000 IY,WO 812,000 3,36o,000 LICLON 101161,W0
10 Other EoWn hulas 0 0
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
II TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,053,OW 2,3414,00 2,652,000 3,050,W0 S,UVLM 13,%9,000 21,539,W0 41,IW,NO
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ......... .
12 A....... 1 GrrY-Mer I.*.or Year 21843.000 3,I13,000 1,935,W0 6,236,000 I,1so,000 I'me O 191516,01s) 19,566,000
13 Net 9ear'6 or, Period FhaMa9 Requirnenle 11021,W0 11153.00) 1,126,000 1,525,W0 1,1%,000 1,1H,W0 2,131,OW 2,1SI,(H0
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
11 fund lalan¢or (Deficit) I1e16.000 3,660,040 3,6N,oN 11111.000 5.996,000 5.996.W0 16,115,W0 16,115,W0
CAPIIAI fUND(S)
IS Reserves 1 Carry-over fro. List Year 11,296,0W 11,639,OW 9,265,W0 5,1541 (2,253,00) 11,296,01, (2,511,000) 11,2%,OW
----------- ----------- ---I------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ...........
REVENUE
16 Lonsl rv[lion Drake 126.00 371.00 82,N0 191,W0 491,00 1,573.000 576,000 2.149.00
II fees: OOnneclion 343,000 756.000 1,191,00) 1,291.000 1,291.00 S,17S,ON 6,455,000 11.630,00
IB Other 5.00 6,000 6,N0 6,00 LEND 30,ON 40,00 10,00
19 $ale of Capacity A19hts Tom 208.000 12.00 12.000 593,OW 813,0N 126,000 1,169,000
20 Interest 1 NSscellanequs IW9A 228,N0 212,000 512,0e) 103,W0 0 2,085.000 0 2,085,OW
21 Equity Sale to District ❑ I,OW,WO I,WO,NO 1,000,000
22 floe b...d Equity Adlul Mrt 2,398,000 2,398,W0 21598.000
23 Other Inco.e 150,000 2,050,040 300,0N 1,100,000 3,9aLm 350,OW 1,2W,ohn
21 TOTAL REVENUE 1,618,0N 2.239,00 1,156,01110 2,206,000 3,I65,W0 11,041,001, 1121/.OW 25,251,N0
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
25 TOTAL AVAILABLE FROM 15.911,00) 13.I18.000 13.441.000 1,561,0i0 1,532,140 ; 26,303,000 5,610,001) 36,541.400
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... . . .... ........ . ..----
EXPENOITYRES
26 SMr.of Joint North Rgt¢nt Plant 2.533.000 2.918.00 1,125,040 1,120.00 1.962.00 T6,618,00) 21165.00 19,083,00)
21 District Collection SYste. 1.675.00 1,501,ON 2,115,000 1,115,000 1,125,N0 11,151,000 1,635,N0 16,389,W0
ie R U,bU,5e.aAt A9ree.ent P....gtX 61,000 111,000 883,0N 122,0N 722.000 2,SOS,00 2,505,0W
29 Flo based Equity Adjustment 0 0
30 Other Expenditures 0 a
11 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,215,0N 1,593,000 8.203,00 11611.00 1,109,W0 30,871,000 1,I0,WO 37.911.00
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
33 Reserves I Larry-aver to Nest Year 11,639,00 9.285,00 S.1 SB,OW 17.253.001 (2,511,00) I 12,511,0001 ILUO,W01 11.130,No1
_.._..... .._._...... ............ ......___ .....__... .......
SCHEDULE A
Page 2
4/23/87
995-92/
LINE - ----- 1...... 1988-89 198--W 19W--- --year --ql ------- ---Year---- Iota-
.... "-.--. _•__ -_.._ ._._._ ------- - ----------_ _.-_..... -_-.....--..
BOND FOUNDER)
------------
33 Reserves 6 Carry-Nor free list Year 2S,000 28.M 31,W0 28,W0 25.m 25,000 0 15.000
........... ....... ..... ........... ........ i ----------- ----------- -----------
REVENUE
34 W LCVY 24,0W 23.W0 22.OW 21.WO W,OW 90.W0
35 lnleresl 1 Ni¢0e11aneoue Deepen 2,OW 2,W0 2,DW 2,OW 1,000 9.000 0 9.AN
36 Otter Income 0
32 TOTAL REVENUE 26,000 25,W0 24,00 23,W0 I.WO 99,000 0 99,000
------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ..... --- ----- -----
a TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 51,OW 53,W0 5S,OW SLOW 26,000 124,000 0 124.000
EIPENOITURES
------------
39 Bond Pri.ml A Interest 23,010 22,000 21,OW 26,000 26,000 124,OW 124,W0
e0 Otter Expenditures
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
al TOTAL ENPIADITURES 23,000 22,00 27,000 26,000 26,00 124,00 0 IL4,000
.......... ........... ........... ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------. -----------
42 Reserves a Garry-Over to Next Year 211,000 31,W0 28,OW 25,OW 0 0 0 0
43 Next Year's Dry Period funding Requirements M,OW 31,6W 20.000 25,W0 0 i 0 0 0
_......... ........... ........... ........... ........... , ---------- ----------- -----------
Ca fund Balance or (Deficit) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ........... ........... ......
SUMMARY (AlmW for Inter-fund Iranslersl
45 Reserves 1 Carry Over from Last year 13,e14,000 14,510.00 13,129,00 10,121,000 6,000,000 ' 13,616,000 5,1131000 13.414,000
16 TOTAL REVENUE 6,ell,OW 5,540.000 1,954,000 6,580,000 8,80B,RAN 36,329.000 42,582,W0 83,911,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ........... , ----------- ._... .... ...........
42 TOTAL AVAILABLE DRYING 19,661,W0 20.050.00 21,013,000 16,701.00 12,e16,000 49,213.00 52.755.00 91,325,W0
a8 TOTAL ❑PENDINRES 6,351.000 6,921,W0 10,962,000 12,693,000 1,643,W0 14,SIO,W0 34,639,000 19,209,W0
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -------
Reserves A Carry Over to Next Year 13,510,00 13,129,01) 10,121,00 e,001,00 5,113,OW 5,173,OW 181116,000 18,116.00
50 Next Year's dry Period funding Requirements 1,055,N0 I,Im.m I,SSa,WO 1159.000 1.15a,0011 1,154,400 2,131,W0 2,131,W0
........... ........... ........... ---- , ----------. ----------- -----------
51 FUND BALANCE OR (DEFICIT) 12,655,000 11,945,004 8,161,OW 2,459,000 3,419,W0 3,419,OW 15.185,000 15,315,0W
"I1) SAA i TA'm DISTRICT NO.S SCHEDULE B � •�
5(AIWIE Tf DISIRIa COIIECIION SYSTEM PA0I(O3 4/21/87 i
PAnICT TOTAL C.I.P. 19B1.86 1908.89 1989.94 19n-41 1991-97 1992-IS 1993-91
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Aad10 LKLId Weevily 11 50,000 50,000
toast Iron, fora Aunt.
I. Biller Point Nep Station
to Newport Blvd. 5-IM-3 till' L223.000 940,000 2SLOOO
2. Newport Blvd. to Back Say 5-29 (t) tall 2,220.000 I2.000 206.000 1.600.000 11000.00
3. $1na Ally Rlyer to Biller Point
Puro Station (3) Ire l' 2.300,000 S00,000 1.00.000 1.000.000
a. Holly Point to Newport Blvd.
(Moth side) 13) (at- I,S10,000 310.000 1.200,000
Role . lino Tara Min and PCN Port! MIT.
ILide Force Ran to Yalu B 15-26 (1) It) 1.187.000 9B1.000 200,000
.1 St.. lath St., aM Lsde Puep
Station leproyue.to (2) la) S53.000 43.000 260.000 50.000
ROMpallale Balboa Penlaula bunk,
Liao Pulp to -A" Street ❑I let MINOR 1501000 2501000 100.000
Bey Bridge PUSP Station [.APen./INpf. IS) (1) 600,000 50,000 500.000 50,000
Bitter Point Pulp Station Upgrade ill HI' 62.000 62.000
Small Daue Trunk Sewer (3) la) 1.700,0" 1.000,000 100.000
AMt, Pmnl Puep Salton Upgrade (3) aP 66.000 66.00D
Alsee)WII.II Projects (1) 350.000 50,000 $0,000 $0.000 50.000 50,000 50.000 50.000
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
.Wt0al ACT Fund 12,121,000 1,9B2,OW 1,S29.000 2,100.000 2.650,000 1.100MO 11050.000 360.000 1.29.000
. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. ..... ...........
Blade Drive bunt Seue (3) (b) 2,140,000 100,000 1,800.n0 200.000
taco Shoes Poop Station and alension
It Crt, SoMr to State Park (31 (1) 300,000 150.00 150.000
E.tenaon at toast Trans, Corona Del Aar
Pgu Sta. to Crystal Cove hop Ble. Icl 1.100,000 104.000 1.00.000
C rys tat Cove Puep stet ion (31 10 400.000 100.000
EY1e06101 It Spite Coast Trunk Iue Crystal
Love Pilot Sta. to spite Caau Dew. ICI 500.00 500.000
Auctanews Protests tat 125.00 25.000 25.000 25.00 ri,WO 25.000 25.00 25.00
........... ........... ... ....... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
5o0-atal FA fund 1,5)5.0W O 135.On 225,00 I.925.000 325.000 1.125.On 525.On 25,00
----------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
,PANT TOTAL In,69,,000 1.482.00 1.504.000 2.675,000 4.415.000 I.I25.000 2.475,000 885.000 L:'S,OQO
........... ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... ........... ........... ...........
III Fully funded 1. has Ur-Phnned taallties Presently under COAStfaCtar
To) Partially funded 2. Neear'P...led fulllllei pesently under I..lgo
I. Mgt rural! T. Meal-panned tacllpme snadu ten to, 4tarr :e'19nlans uommN
r ;
RE ; AGENDA ITEM N0. 3(c)
ORDINANCE NO. 516
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
`..i OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFURNIA, ESTABLISHING
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES, AND
REPEALING ORDINANCES NOS. 511, 513 AND 515
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish a system
of sanitary sewer service charges required to be paid by property owners for the
services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with its
sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system.
Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for
the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the
sewage collection facilities and wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of
the District, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary
reserves.
Section 2: Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing July 1, 1987,
each parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with
structures designed for residential, commercial or industrial use and connected
to the District's system, shall pay a sanitary sewer service charge based on the
average volume of wastewater discharged by a class of users in the sum or sums
as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance.
Section 3: Application of Ordinance. The provisions of this Ordinance
shall be in addition to Ordinance No. 514 of the District establishing
regulations for use of District's sewage facilities, including provisions for
payment of charges or fees related thereto.
Section 4: Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all
properties in the District, and no exception shall be provided for properties
-1-
e
otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of
the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public
agencies or tax exempt organizations, except as expressly provided in Section 5
hereof.
Section 5: Exemptions and Appeals. In recognition that certain legal
parcels of real property exist within the District which are not connected to
the District system and that other properties acquire considerably greater
potable water than is ultimately discharged to the District's system, it is the
intent of the District that said parcels be exempt totally or in part from the
payment of charges as prescribed herein.
Any property owner may appeal the assessment of the charges and submit a
claim for rebate to the District on the forms prescribed and provided by the
District, within one hundred twenty (120) days after the annual bill is mailed.
All applications for rebate of the annual sewer service charge will be
determined by the General Manager of the District, or his designee, who may
grant a partial or full rebate or adjustment of the charge based on receiving
satisfactory proof that an inequity exists between the amount and the amount of
wastewater discharged to the District's systems. Such inequities may include,
but are not limited to the following instances:
(a) the use of the parcel differs from the use indicated by the charge;
(b) no service connection to the District system exists from the parcel
charged;
(c) the principal water use is agricultural;
(d) any other use wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the
District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the
amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of
property in question.
�.r
-2-
Section 6: Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year. The sanitary sewer service
charge established by this Ordinance shall remain in effect until such time as
the rates adopted by the District ordinance are changed, and there shall be no
proration of such charges in any fiscal year.
Section 7: Method of Collection. Pursuant to the authority granted by
California Health and Safety Code Section 5473, all charges established herein
shall be collected on the County Tax Roll in the same manner, by the same
persons and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its
general taxes. The County Tax Collector is authorized and hereby ordered to
make said collections in accordance with the terms and conditions of agreements
between the County of Orange and this District.
In the event District determines that errors or inequities exist in the
amount of charges to be collected by the County Tax Collector, District may
submit a bill for any difference directly to the property owner. Said invoiced
amount shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of invoice date.
Section 8: Credit for Industrial Permittees. A credit shall be allowed to
all discharges permitted pursuant to Article 3 of Ordinance No. 514 in an amount
equal to the annual sanitary sewer service charge established by Section 2 of
this Ordinance in the.same manner as credit is allowed for ad valorem taxes
pursuant to Section 302.6(B), 303.6(B) and 304.5(B) (4) of Ordinance No. 514.
Section 9: Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the
application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by order of court, the
remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons
or other circumstances shall not be affected.
Section 10: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective July 1,
1987.
Section ll. Ordinance Nos. 511, 513 and 515 are hereby repealed of the
-3-
effective date hereof, as it is inconsistent with the provisions of this
Ordinance.
Section 12: The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the District as required by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 5 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
ATTEST:
Secretary, Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
-4-
TABLE A
Class of Basis of 1987-88 Minimum Annual
User Charge Annual Fate Charge Per Unit
Single-Family Charge per $26.40 $26.40
Dwellings/ duelling unit
Condomniums
Ybilti-Family Charge per 15.85 15.85
Dwellings/Mobile dwelling unit
Homes/Apartments
Crnmercial/ Charge per 1,000 18.90 18.90
Industrial/Other square feet of
(goverment building
buildings,
utilities,
non-profit
organizations,
etc.)
RE ; AGENDA ITEM NO. 3(d)
a
ORDINANCE NO. 517
`..i AN ORDINANCE OF THE HOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
SECTION 702 OF ORDINANCE NO. 514 PERTAINING
TO CONNECTION CHARGES FUR USE OF DISTRICT
SRWRRAGE FACIISTIES, AND REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO. 512
The Hoard of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Section 702 of Ordinance No. 514 is hereby amended to read:
"B. District Connection Charges.
Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall
gay to the District, or its agent, the charges specified herein:
1. For each new dwelling building constructed, the connection charges
shall be:
Zane 1 - $ 500.00 per dwelling unit.
Zone 2 - $1,100.00 per dwelling unit.
Zone 3 - $1,500.00 per dwelling unit.
2. For all other new construction, including, but not limited to,
commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public
buildings, the connection charges shall be:
Zone 1 - $ 260.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained
within such construction, provided that the minimum
connection charge for such new construction shall be
$260.00.
Zone 2 - $ 570.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained
within such construction, provided that the minimum
connection charge for such new construction shall be
$570.00.
Zone 3 - $2,400.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained
within such construction, provided that the minimum
connection chare for such new construction shall be
$2,400.00.
-1-
r
3. For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection
charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in
paragraphs (1) and (2) above. If such replacement construction is
commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the
formes building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed,
calculated on the basis of the current connection charge applicable
for the new construction of the building demolished or destroyed.
In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charge.
4. In the case of structures where further new construction or
alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings
or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling
buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same
basis as provided in paragraphs (1) and (2) above for each dwelling
unit added or created or each 1,000 square feet of additional
floor area contained within such new construction, provided that
new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units.
5. Payment of connection charges shall be required at the time of
issuance of the building permit for all construction within the
District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from
the requirement of obtaining a building permit in the City of
Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection charge for such
exempt buildings will be required at the time of, or prior to, the
issuance of a plumbing connection permit for any construction
within the District."
Section 2: Fees established by Section 702 shall be effective July 1, 1987.
Section 3: Ordinance No. 512 is hereby repealed on the effective date
hereof, as it pertains to Ordinance No. 508 which was previously repealed by
Ordinance No. 514.
Section 4: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and cause same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the District as required by law.
-2-
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Hoard of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 5 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held
Chairman of the Baird of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
-3-
ADDITIONAL USER FEE PROVISIONS IN CURRERr DISTRICT 6 ORDINANCE
Condominiums: Condominiums are considered single-family dwellings. However, in
recognition of the limited potential use of smell, converter] dwelling units, the
owner of a single unit may apply for a reduction of the annual rate from $26.40
to $15.85, provided the unit has less than 11 plumbing fixture units (determined
as follows):
Fixture Units Assigned
by Uniform Building Cade
Single bath with tub, water 7 Fixture Units
closet and wash basin
Kitchen with sink and/or 2 Fixture Units
dishwasher
Laundry facilities 2 Fixture Units
11 Fixture Units
Cannercial/Industrial: To recognize buildings in this classification where the
use of the sewer system may not be directly related to the size of the building
such as in a warehousing type of use, any owner of a single building may apply
for a reduction of the calculated fee to a minimum annual fee of $15.85,
provided said building contains less than 11 plumbing fixture units (as
determined above) .
• �v -r4. 0
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post OHioe 6oz 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Am Code 714
DISTRICT No. 5 9540-2910
622411
AGENDA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1987 - 4 : 30 P .M.
NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL - COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM
( 1) Roll call
(2) (a) Verbal status report on the District' s sewer
rehabilitation program and Master Plan of facilities to
serve the District.
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
d Committee to negotiate with Robert Bein, William
Frost & Associates for design of rehabilitation of
second barrel of the Coast Highway Force Main from the
Arches to Upper Newport Bay.
(3) Consideration of items re long-range financial program:
(a) Staff report on supplemental user fee program and
preliminary cash flow projections.
(b) Discussion
(c) Consideration of actions relative to Ordinance No. 516 ,
An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California,
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges , and
Repealing Ordinances Nos . 511 , 513 and 515 :
(Copy enclosed with agenda material)
(1) Report of General Counsel re proposed ordinance.
( 2) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 516 ,
An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges , and Repealing Ordinances Nos . 511, 513
and 515 , by title only, and waive reading of said
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present) .
( ITEM 3 CONTINUED ON PAGE 2)
(3) (c) (3) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance
No. 516 , An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, fir'
California, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges , and Repealing Ordinances Nos, 511, 513
and 515 , and pass to second reading on May 13 ,
1987 .
(d) Consideration of actions relative to Ordinance No. 517 ,
An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California,
Amending Section 702 of Ordinance No. 514 Pertaining to
Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities , and Repealing Ordinance No. 512:
(Copy enclosed with agenda material)
(1) Report of General Counsel re proposed ordinance.
(2) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 517,
An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance
No. 514 Pertaining to Connection Charges for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities , and Repealing
Ordinance No. 512 , by title only, and waive
reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted
by unanimous vote of Directors present) .
(3) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance
No. 517, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Amending Section 702 of Ordinance
No. 514 Pertaining to Connection Charges for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 512 , and pass to second reading on
May 13 , 1987 .
( 4) Other business and communications , if any
(5) Consideration of motion to adjourn -&",O
5
-2-
F
v
1
G �
■ V.2 FINANCING s
The proposed trunk sewers force mains and pump i
stations that are included in the South Coast portion
of the District 5 Master Plan will, to the extent
possible, be financed by connection charges. }.
i
The total projected cost of these facilities is
■ estimated as follows: Y
w Facility
A. Reconstruction of Cameo Shores $ 350,000
Pump Station extension of the
existing 15 inch City line to
the westerly boundary of the Y
proposed State Park and instal- P
M lation of a force main to "
1
Pacific Coast Highway
B. Extension of Bayside Drive Trunk 1, 500,000
gravity line from the abandoned
Bayside Drive Pump Station to
the Corona del Mar Pump Station
C. Construction of the Crystal Cove 300,000
Pump Station
D. Construction of 7,550 lineal feet of 565,000 °
24 inch gravity line and 2,800 lineal
feet of force main between Crystal
Cove Pumping Station and the Corona
del Mar Pump Station
E. Construction of an 18 inch gravity 150,000
line from the westerly limit of The
Irvine Company' s proposed 375 acre e
tract to the proposed Crystal Cove
Pumping Station
1 Total Cost, including
Engineering and Contingencies $2,865,000
r
-26-
1
4
k
i �
rThe sewage connection fees currently charged for
„r new construction in Zone 1 of District No. 5 is $250
per dwelling unit and $130 per 1,000 square feet for
commercial buildings.
The above estimate of ultimate dwelling units,
i.e. , 3,148 is, of course, subject to revision due to
possible changes in current development philosophy or
annexations to the District. Regardless, discussions
i
with the Sanitation Districts staff indicate the derived
a ' dwelling unit totals should be substantially reduced for
calculating sewer connection fees to provide adequate
funding and to allow for planning revisions.
It should be noted that property within the limits
of the Coastal drainage area that will, in all probabil-
ity, be annexed to District 5 at a future date are not
included in this analysis.
Assuming a 25% reduction in the total above, the
dwelling units count would be reduced to 2,361. As-
suming a 30% building area factor for the 96 acres of
commercial area results in 652 Equivalent Dwelling Units.
Therefore, the total of Equivalent Dwelling Units
for the proposed Residential and Commercial Development
is 3,013. Dividing this total into the above Total
Cost of proposed Sewage Facilities results in an addi-
tional connection charge requirement of $951 per Dwelling
Unit.
In summary, the connection charges required to
finance construction of the sewage facilities servicing
the South Coast Development are as follows:
Residential - $250 + $951 - $1201/D.U. . . .say $1,200
Commercial - $130 + $951 x 1923 = $1959/1000 S.F.
r. 1000 , , ,say $2,600
. .
-27-
Based on the above and considering contingencies,
engineering, etc. , the range of the projected connection
charges should be:
Residential $1,200 to $1,500 per Unit � l
Commercial $2, 000 to $2, 500 per 1000 S.F.
of Building Area -
. 1
V.3 COST ESTIMATES rk"
Table III summarizes the estimated construction
costs and scheduling for the Rehabilitation and new
District projects.
Table IV summarizes the estimated installation ��'
o�
costs and preliminary scheduling for the projects M-.
necessitated by the development of the South Coast. A�
, w
e�1v
�`J l
J 1�L
4
w�
J
lYl
S�
-25-
'`i
N coaHsRA S1P<R-7s M•44. 412 (57A 2+q(o.Go)
Ad1b TZAc-JS-U5 7VW#IkKV M• 4 . ip ll ( Smo, O + $1.20)
VLq�, 45;T . Ins ;:'C• Squlo otetT P�KS
couNrf:p. �Izon
OK 110. 4 1 + So.?a I q" / rwiw.
I4-q Ivi . o I + 68.So .7 csa./ wuV-.
617o 103.7 1 + 62.410 I a /utlui
°1e-18 137.0 I + roq.6o t Csstt-/Haiw
IO2O Q N4N 1¢0 .13 1 + 55. 5 3 &AA- / ue;uJ
1100 Ib0 . 3 1 + 3G. 3 I 6-7ca./ L4U'u.
I 1 5 S I fo8.'1 1 4 27. 9 t Gan, / w,;.,
Il $5 177, 0 1+ Id) . Go
1230 195.0 1+ 11 . 6o 3 t-.,.. /tu.,.
1395 M.wt 220.5 0 +7S.la 5 E,at./ ttu,µ.
—
Ct.tr,� e
MEETING DATE April 28, 1987 TIME 4:30 PM DISTRICTS 5 (Newport Beach City Hall)
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
(EDGAR)........HOESTEREY..._ (PICKLER)..........SAY.........
(CRANK)........HANSON...... _ (FRIED)........ SIGONGER...._
(YOUNG)........GRISET...... _ _ (NORBY)............CATLIN...... _
(ROTH).........STANTON..... (RISHER)...........CLIFT.......
(PLUMMER)..........COX.........
DISTRICT 2 (PERRY)............CULVER......
(KENNEDY)....
(NORBY)........CATLIN...... (MC CUNE1..........GR I FFIN..... _
(WEDEL)........MAHONEY....._ _ _ (YOUNG)............GRISET......
(PICKLER)......SAY......... (CRANK)............HANSON......
(FRIED)........BIGONGER.... (COX)..............HART........ _
(YOUNG)........GRISET....... (EDGAR)............HOESTEREY..._
(NEL SON).......LEYTON...... (CORONADO).........KANEL.......
(SCOTT)........NEAL........ (WINCHELL).........KELLY.......
(DOWNEY).......NEWTON...... _ _ (EDGAR)............KENNEDY.....
(CUL VER).......PERRY......._ _ _ (NELSON)...........LEYTON......
(FAS BENDER)....SILZEL...... (WEDEL)............MAHONEY.....
_
(PEREZ)........SMITH....... (PLUMNER)..........MAURER......
(ROTH).........STANTON....._ _ _ (GREEN. P).........MAYS........
_
(AGRAN)............MILLER. S..._
DISTRICT 3 (BIGONGER).........MURPHY......
(SCOTT)............NEAL........
(HERMAN).......POLIS ...... (SUTTON)...........NELSON......
(WEISHAUPT)....SAPIEN...... _ _ (DOWNEY)...........NEWTON......
(PICKLER)......BAY......... (CULVER)...........PERRY.......
(NORBY)........CATLIN......_ __ _ _ (HERMAN)...........POLIS.......
(RISHER).......CLIFT....... _ _ (WEISHAUPT)........SAPIEN......
(PERRY)........CULVER...... (WILES)............SIEFEN...... _
(MC CUNE)......GRIFFIN..... _ _ (FASBENDER)........SILZEL......
(YOUNG)........GRISET...... _ _ (PEREZ)............SMITH.......
(CDR ONADO).....HANEL....... _ _ (ROTH).............STANTON.....
(WINCHELL).....KELLY......._ _ _ (NELSON)...........SUTTON......
_
(WEDEL)........MAHONEY..... _ _ (MILLER. 0)........SWAN........
(SCOTT)........NEAL........ _ _ (SELVAGGI).........SYLVIA......
(SUTTON).......NELSON...... _ _ (GREEN.H/JOHNSON)..WAHNER......_ _
(WILES)........SIEFEN......_
(BOTH).........STANTON....._
(SELVAGGI).....S YLVIA......_
_�.._ __...._.. _._.....,.._. $TREE:
DISTRICT 5 SYLVESTERCLARKE......�
DAWES.......
(COX)..........HART........JL _ _ ANDERSO ....JL
((ROTH).........COX.......... BUTLER......
ROTH).........SAWINiBM.....JL_ _ BUTLER......JL
__ —___.__._ :AOWN.......
DISTRICT 6 BAKERKER.......
KYLE........
( ......WANNER......_ _ _ VONLANGEN
(PLUMMER ......STARER......_ _ _ WINSON......
(ROTH).........STANTON....._ _
_ _ SiREED......_
CLAWSON.....
DISTRICT 7 OOTEN.......
LINDER......Z
(KENNEDY)......EDGAR....... _ _ DEBLIEUX...._
(AGRAN)........MILLER. 5..._ _ _ TALEBI......
(PLUMMER)......Cox........._ _ _ ROLL........
(YOUNG)........GRISET...... _ _ 1(A& n,
(PERE Z)........SMITH......._ _ _
(ROTH).........STANTON....._ _
(GREEN. H).....WAHNER......_ _ _ OTHERS: WOODRUFF...._
ATKINS......
DISTRICT 11 HOHENER.....
HOWARD......
(WINCHELL).....KELLY....... _ _ HUNT........
(ROTH).........STANTON..... _ _ KEITH.......
(GREEN. P).....MAYS........_ _ _ KNOPF.......
LINDSTROM..._
DISTRICT 13 LYNCH.......
YOUNG.......
(NELSON)....... UTTON......_ _ _ ,�_• „ ,
(BIGONGER ....•MURPHY A ......_
(PICKLE.).. BY...
.....SMITH
......_ ^ ,.
(PERE))........SMITH.......
_ Fr�uwAWWUVV.
(ROTH).........STANTON.....
_
DISTRICT 14 ���r
(AGRAN)........MILLER. 5...
(MILLER. D ....SWAN........
(EDGER)..... KEN
....SMITH. ...... _
(PETS))........SMITH.......
(ROTH)..........STANTON....._
04/09/87
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
OF ORANGE OOUNTY, CALIFORNIA
EIIPA)TES OF ADJOURNED RB=M ME fING.
April 28, 1987 - 4:30 p.m.
Newport Reach City Nall
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of April 8, 1987, the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California,
met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Newport
Beach City Hall Council Conference Room.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. In the absence of the
Secretary, Rita J. Brown, Chairman Hart appointed J. Wayne Sylvester Secretary
pro tem. The roll was called and the Secretary pro tem reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT: Evelyn Hart, Chairman, John C. Cox, Jr.,
Dan R. Roth
DIRKS ABSEW: Note
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
William H. Butler, Thomas M. Dawes,
John Linder, Cesar Sandulescu
01HERS PRESENT: Don R. Griffin, Joint Chairmen,
Ruthelyn Plummer, Ben Nolan, Joe Devlin,
Bob Dixon, Mike Swan, Jim Ro
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Status Report on District's Sewer
Rehabilitation Program and Master
Plan of Facilities to Serve the
District
Rehabilitation of the Pacific Coast The staff reviewed the ongoing major
Highway Force Main System rehabilitation program designed to
upgrade the District's backbone dual
force aein system in Pacific Coast Highway, jointly awned by Districts
Non. 5 and 6, which has experienced several breaks in the past. Currently,
the District is reconstructing the reach between Rocky Point Pump Station
and a crossover located westerly of the Arches (Newport Boulevard). In
addition, repair of the force mein system fran Lido Pump Station at Short
Street to Pacific Coast Highway is included in the contract. Mien this
project is finished, the District will have canpleted a rehabilitation of
one of the twin barrels extending from the treatment plant in Hontington
_ Beach to the Upper Newport Back Bay. This will greatly increase the
reliability of the force mein system.
-1-
District 5
04/28/87
The next project will include rehabilitation of the second force main
beginning at Orange Avenue westerly of the Arches and extending to the Upper
Newport Back Bay. It is estimated that this work will cost $2,350,000.
Over a portion of the force main, between Orange Street and Old Newport
Boule,*rd, the City of Newport Beach has under design a street improvement
project for Pacific Coast Highway. The project is being administered by the
City and funded by CalTrans. The City has retained Robert Bein, William
Frost and Associates to design the project. District staff has held an
informal discussion with the City as to the advisability of including the
replacement of the sewer pipe within that reach so that in the future, newly
improved street improvements will not be disrupted. The City and CalTrans
have indicated a willingness to do so, particularly if the District can stay
within their schedule.
Staff reccmended that the Selection Carmittee be authorized to negotiate
with the City's designer, Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, to
prepare plans and specifications, in two phases, for the reconstruction of
the second force main in Pacific Coast Highway. The first phase will be
incorporated within the limits of the City's contract; the second phase
under separate District contract at a later date would include
reconstruction from Old Newport easterly to the Upper Newport Back Bay.
Rehabilitation of the Balboa Trunk The Director of Engineering reported
Sewer System that an engineering investigation of
the Balboa Trunk Sewer System, built in
1943, extending from the Lido Pump Station at Short Street and Newport
Boulevard to the A Street Pump Station at Balboa Boulevard, had been
conrretel. The system includes approximately 12,700 feet of 15-inch to
24-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) and about 40 manholes.
A significant portion of the wastewater collected and transported from the
Balboa Peninsula is seawater which infiltrates into both City and District
sewers. One of the objectives of the investigation was to determine the
condition of the line so that corrective measures could be recommended to
ensure the structural integrity of the line as well as to reduce seawater
infiltration. The Director of Engineering narrated a video tape of the
inside of the sewer taken during the engineering inspection that shoos that
nearly all of the infiltration into the District's line is at the joints
rather than from failure of the pipe between the joints. Clay pipe joints
installed forty years ago did not include the leak-proof techniques
incorporated in today's compression seals. Small sections of the pipe were
also observed to be cracked but these can be easily repaired.
The consultant that conducted the study, Robert Bein, William Frost and
Associates, believes that the majority of the leaks can be repaired by
chemical. grouting. It is estimated that the grouting will cost about
$110,000. However, the manholes are in worse condition, and reconstruction
is recarmended. The manhole reconstruction would include about 10 feet of
new pipe on each side and at each side entry where the pipe is generally in
poor condition. Staff estimates that the manhole reconstruction will cost
about $390,000. Total project cost for rehabilitation of the Balboa
Peninsula Trunk is estimate] at $500,000. Staff reported that it is
proceeding with solicitation of engineering proposals for preparation of
plans and specifications for this project.
-2-
District 5
04/28/87
Downcast Area The Director of Engineering reviewed
the master planned facilities to serve
the 3500 acre downcoast area presently within the boundaries of District
No. 5 but not within the City of Newport Beach boundaries. The facilities
include an extension of the Coast Highway Trunk System and the Bayside Drive
Trunk Sewer, construction of the Crystal Cove Pump Station and other
modifications to the existing Bay Bridge Pump Station at a total estimated
cost of $6.6 million. Mr. Dawes pointed out that the District is still
awaiting final development plans from The Irvine Company before the staff
will be able to finalize the master plan sewerage system needs of District
No. 5 for the downcoast area. Mr. Dawes also pointed out that the downcoast
area is within the Irvine Ranch Water District and that the Water District
had prepared an Irvine Coast Subarea Master Plan for providing the local
sewer system but that a final determination on the local sever service was
yet to be made.
Authorizing the Selection Canmittee Moved, seconded and duly carried:
to negotiate with Robert Bein,
William Frost a Associates for That the Selection Committee be, and is
design of Rehabilitation of Second hereby, authorized to negotiate with
Barrel of the Coast Highway Force Robert Bein, William Frost s Associates
Main from the Arches to Upper for design of Rehabilitation of Second
Newport Bay Barrel of the Cast Highway Force Main
from the Arches to Upper Newport Bay.
Update on the District's Long-range The Director of Finance reported that in
Financial Program 1981 the Board adopted a supplemental
user fee program to make up the shortfall
of ad valorem tax revenues and provide needed additional financing for
operations and major rehabilitation work on the sever system.
When the program was originally presented to the public and adopted by the
Board, it was anticipated that it would be necessary to increase the fees by
approximately 77% beginning with the second year to finance the rehabilitation
work on the trunk sewer system. The District has been able to delay any
increase in the supplemental user fees originally adopted in 1981 as well as its
connection fees due to a significant decline in inflation rates, receipt of
favorable bids on various District and joint works construction and
rehabilitation projects, and delays in various major plant projects, all of
which have reduced District expenditures and cash flow requirements well below
budgeted levels.
In addition, on the revenue side of the budget, the turnaround in economic
conditions and the resultant new construction and resale activity over the past
few years have resulted in a significant increase in the assessed valuation of
properties which has generated additional ad valorem tax revenues for the
District. Further, the formation of District 14 resulted in the District
receiving approximately $2,000,000 from the new district's purchase of capacity
in the joint treatment and disposal facilities. The positive financial impacts
of District 14's formation on District 5 were also reinforced by the Joint
District's concurrent shift to a 100% flow-based method of allocating ownership
and each District's share of joint treatment works construction costs which
further reduced District 5's share of the joint works construction costs.
-3-
District 5
04/28/87
Mr. Butler then reviewed the District's projected financial condition for the
next ten years based on the current fee schedules. The preliminary cash flow
projections indicate that the revenues generated by the District's current
supplemental user fee schedule in canbination with the District's higher ad
valorem tax revenues will bt sufficient to fund 100% of the District's operating
expenses for the next ten years
The cash flaw projections also indicate that the District's projected revenues
from connection fees, Federal and State grants, inane resulting from the
formation of District 14 in January, 1986, and contributions from developers for
planned development for the down-coast area of the District and miscellaneous
income, will not provide sufficient capital funds to finance the scheduled
projects over the next ten years due to increased joint treatment facility
construction requirements, but the District remains financially healthy on an
overall basis.
The following fee schedule has been in effect since 1981:
Single Unit Parcels
Connected Meter Size annual Fee
1" or less $ 26.40
1P 52.50
2" 105.00
3" 210.00
4" 420.00
6" 840.00
8" 1,680.00
If parcel contains more than one water
meter, then the charge applicable to each
meter shall. be added together, and the
sum levied against the parcel.
Multi-Unit Parcels
Per Unit $15.85
Mr. Butler reported that during the past year he and the General Counsel had met
with the California State Water Resources Control Board's Revenue Program
Specialist to review the status of the Districts' Revenue Program, the long-range
financial plan adopted by the Joint Boards in April, 1979 to canply with federal
and state construction grant program regulations. The State Board representative
has indicated that the water-meter-based fee used by District No. 5 for
supplemental user fees is not acceptable to the State Board. The State prefers a
fee basis which establishes flat fees for single and multi-family residences and
fees based upon square footage of imuprovements for canner cial, industrial,
governmental and other facilities.
Therefore, staff recommended that the Board consider changing the existing
dater-meter-based fee structure to a flat fee and square footage-based fee
similar to the fee structure adopted by District No. 6 in 1983, as follows:
-4- �"'
District 5
04/28/87
1987-88
Class of.User Basis of Charge Annual Rate
Single-Family Charge per Dwelling $26.40
Dwellings/Condominiums Unit
Multi-Family (Surge per Dwelling 15.85
Dwellings/Apartments/ Unit
Mobile Homes
Comercial/ Charge per 1,000 18.90
Industrial/Other Sq. Ft. of Building
(government
buildings,
utilities,
non-profit
organizations,
etc.)
Implememtation of the proposed supplemental user fee modification will generate
approximately $46,000 in additional revenue each year.
The casts for planning, design and construction of master-planned collection,
treatment and disposal facilities to acconnodate increased flows are continuing
to increase. As pointed out above, there is a projected capital revenue
shortfall. Therefore, staff recommended that the Board consider raising the
District's existing one-time connection as follows:
Existing Fees
Single/Malti-Family Comercial/Industrial/
Zone Dwelling Units Governmental/Other
1 $250 per dwelling $130 per 1,000 square feet of building
2 $850 per dwelling $440 per 1,000 square feet of building
3 $1,250 per dwelling $2,000 per 1,000 square feet of building
Recommended Fees
1 $500 per dwelling $260 per 1,000 square feet of building
2 $1,100 per dwelling $570 per 1,000 square feet of building
3 $1,500 per dwelling $2,400 per 1,000 square feet of )wilding
`� -5-
' r
District 5
04/28/87
First reading of proposed It was moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 516 carried:
That Ordinance No. 516, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary
Sever Service Charges, and Repealing Ordina�tces Nos. 511, 513 and 515, be read
by title only; and,
FURTHER MON=: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 516 by title only, it was then moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 516, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinances Nos. 511, 513 and 515, be
introduced and passed to the second reading on May 13, 1987, at 7:30 p.m., at
the District's administrative office.
First reading of proposed It was then moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 517 carried:
That Ordinance No. 517, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Section 702 of
Ordinance No. 514 Pertaining to Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 512, be read by title only; and,
Fi7RTEIDi MM.- That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 517 by title only, it was then moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 517, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 512 Pertaining to Cannectdon Charges for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 512, be introduced and passed to the
second reading on May 13, 1987, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's administrative
office.
Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5
be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:50 p.m.,
April 28, 1987.
S re ten, Board of Directors
Sand ion District No. 5 of
California
-6- `.r/
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Adjourned Regular Board
Meeting of District No. 5 held on a$ , 1987 was
duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the
District' s offices on as , 1987.
IN WWIT_NE'SSn WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this a&4
day of , 1987 .
Rita Secretary of the
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. S
of Orange County, California