HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-04-15 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
V.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962-2411
April 9, 1987
NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICT NO. 11
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15, 1987 - 6:00 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of April 8, 1987 ,
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 will
meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date
to review the District' s Master Plan of Trunk Sewers and proposed
Annexation No. 19 - Signal Bolas Annextion to County Sanitation
District No. 11.
Se etary
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Post offlee sox 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 EI(is Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Tekpsp -
Ana Code 714
DISTRICT No. 11 22-.24411
AGENDA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15, 1987 - 6: 00 P.M.
(1) Roll call
(2) Staff Reports:
(a) Review of District's Master Plan of Trunk Sewers to
serve developing territories in and adjacent to the
District
(b) Review of request of Signal Bolas Corporation to annex
1,520 acres in the Bolas Chica area (Proposed
Annexation No. 19 - Signal Bolas Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 11)
(c) Review of long-term financial projections re District's
capital and operating requirements
(3) Board discussion and consideration of actions, if any
(4) Other business and communications, if any
(5) Consideration of motion to adjourn
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts Past Office Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telepl,cnm
Area Code 714
DISTRICT NO. 11 962-24111
962-2411
Adjourned Regular Meeting
April 15, 1987 - 6:00 p.m.
At its regular meeting on April 8th, the Board of Directors
of District No. 11 adjourned to Wednesday, April 15th, at 6:00
p.m. in the Districts' administrative offices to review the
District's Master Plan of Trunk Sewers and proposed Annexation
No. 19 - Signal Bolas Annexation to District No. 11.
On March 11th the Board received and filed a petition from
Signal Bolsa Corporation requesting annexation of 1,520 acres of
territory to the District easterly of Pacific Coast Highway
surrounded by the City of Huntington Beach, generally referred to
as the Bolas Chica area, and referred the request for study. The
Bolas Chica area, presently outside the District's boundaries but
included within its sphere of influence, has been included in the
District' s Master Plan of Sewerage Facilities to be eventually
served by the District.
At the meeting the staff will review in considerable detail
the District's Master Plan of Sewerage Facilities, the request
for Annexation of the Bolsa Chica area, and the District's
long-range financial projections.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
April 91 1987 10944 EWB AVENUE
STAFF REPORT Oo.BOX0127
\V� FOUNTAIN VALLEY.0 UFORMA 82TR 127
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 0J,U9Wz411
MASTER PLAN OF SEWERAGE FACILITIES/PROPOSED BOLSA CHICA ANNEXATION/
LONG TERM FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
Purpose
The purpose of this report is to provide the Board Members with background
information on the long range master plan for providing sewerage services to
District No. 11, particularly as it relates to the request for annexation of
the Bolsa Chica area by the principal landowner, Signal Bolsa Corporation,
and to update the Board on the Districts long-term financial projections.
The report briefly summarizes the major considerations which will be
discussed in further detail at the adjourned meeting of the Board of
Directors on Wednesday, April 15th at 6:00 p.m. They include completion of
the master planned Coast Trunk Sewer Collection System; development of the
Bolsa Chica area, which is surrounded by Sanitation District No. 11 and
included in its sphere of influence; terms of proposed Annexation No. 19 -
Signal Bolsa Annexation; relief of the Slater Avenue Pump Station, which is
nearing capacity; the rehabilitation and ultimate use of the Ocean Avenue
Trunk Sewer; studies for potential future boundary adjustments between
Districts 3 and 11; and financing of the District' s capital operating
requirements.
District No. 11 Drainage Area
County Sanitation District No. 11 is split into two separate drainage areas;
the southerly and the northwesterly portions of the City of Huntington
Beach. The southerly portion drains through the existing reaches of the
Coast Trunk Sewer directly to Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach.
The northwesterly portion, bounded by Goldenwest on the east, the San Diego
Freeway on the north and including the Huntington Harbour area, drains to
the Slater Avenue Pump Station between Goldenwest and Gothard, which lifts
water over the Huntington Beach Mesa easterly to the Knott Interceptor and
the Interplant Interceptor, owned jointly with other Districts, and then to
Treatment Plant No. 2.
Master Plan Overview
Since the District' s formation, a Coast Trunk Sewer system extending
northwesterly from Treatment Plant No. 2 has been envisioned to serve the
Huntington Beach area. Early studies were based on the assumption that
District No. 11 and the City of Huntington Beach boundaries would be
co-terminous. However, the City first developed in a northeasterly
direction and that portion of the City is now in District No. 3. In the
early 1960's, the development of Huntington Harbour began, and the
boundaries of District No. 11 were extended westerly to include that area.
"' 1
Sewer master plans and studies have previously been prepared and/or updated
for District No. 11 in 1947, 1957, 1962, 1970, 1977, and 1981. The current
.,� plan; the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts
2, 3 and 11, was prepared in 1983 (see attached Exhibit A) .
The master plans have been the basis for the orderly development of the
District' s sewerage system including cost sharing agreements for the Knott
Interceptor (with District No. 3) , the Interplant Interceptor (a District
No. 3/11 and Joint Works project) , and the first reaches of the District No.
11 backbone collector, the Coast Trunk Sewer.
Over the last 10 years, the Coast Trunk Sewer has dominated planning and
construction activities for District No. 11. The sewer has also been
Included in the 1977 and 1979 Sewer Master Plans of the City of Huntington
Beach.
In 1979, the first leg of the Coast Trunk Sewer was awarded, extending from
Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach, northwesterly to Lake Street at
Walnut Avenue. The completion of this project allowed the Hamilton Avenue
Pump Station, located at Newland and Hamilton, to be abandoned and also
relieved the Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer and Atlanta Interceptor Sewer. In
1983, the Coast Trunk Sewer was extended to its present terminus, the west
side of Goldenwest Street at Orange Avenue, providing relief for the Ocean
Avenue Trunk Sewer. _
The 1983 Master Plan calls for the extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer to
approximately Slater Avenue at Edwards Street. This would provide relief to
the existing Slater Avenue Pump Station. When the Coast Trunk Sewer is
eventually extended in Slater Avenue to just easterly of Goldenwest Street,
the Slater Avenue Pump Station is proposed to be abandoned (discussed more
fully below) .
Upon completion of Coast Trunk Sewer system, District No. 11 could then sell
its capacities in the Knott Interceptor and Interplant line (extending
between Ellis Avenue and Treatment Plant No. 2 in Brookhurst Street) back to
District No. 3.
Planned future extensions to relieve other existing District No. 11
facilities include the Edwards Trunk Sewer, extending to McFadden Avenue
from Slater, and relief lines in Heil , Edinger and McFadden Avenues.
Slater Avenue Pump Station
The existing Slater Avenue Pump Station contains five pumps. The station
currently discharges at a peak rate of 20 million gallons a day (mgd) , the
approximate design flow. Currently, all five pumps in the station are
required to handle the flows. The fifth pump, which would normally be
standby, now runs about 5 percent of the time. This encroaches upon
reliability factors which should be maintained in an essential service
facility of this type. If one of the five pumps were out for an extended
period of time, the station would perform as expected; however, if two pumps
were out, the station would be seriously overloaded. The Districts'
�./ 2
maintenance division is currently providing extra monitoring of this
station to ensure continual operation.
./
Staff is concerned about continuing and increasing demands being placed on
the Slater Avenue Pump Station. The existing pump station' s capacity cannot
be increased and, as pointed out above, is scheduled to be abandoned upon
completion of the Coast Trunk pursuant to the District' s master plan. The
City's planning department has been very diligent in informing District's
staff of pending development tributary to the pump station, but even with a
typical lag time of two to three years between planning inquiries and
move-in for development, staff believes that the pump station reliability
will soon be seriously compromised unless additional improvements are
completed, such as the extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer, or the
construction of new pumping facilities.
Coast Trunk Sewer Collection System
The existing terminus of the Coast Trunk Sewer is the west side of
Goldenwest Street at Orange Avenue. District plans include extending this
54-inch pipe westerly in Palm Avenue to Seaview Avenue, located on the
westerly boundary of the Huntington Mesa. The sewer is then planned to go
northerly in Seaview Avenue along the bluff. Because the northwest portion
of District No. 11 is at much lower elevations, a new pump station will be
needed to lift sewage into the Coast Trunk Sewer, and one of the best suited
sites is on the northerly side of the existing gas plant located in the
bluff area just north of the present terminus of Seaview Avenue. The sewer
would then continue northerly along the base of the Mesa Bluffs to Edwards
Street south of Talbert Avenue, then north in Edwards Street to Slater
Avenue where it would intercept the Springdale Relief Trunk and the
Slater-Springdale Trunk Sewer. Included in the project would be a relief
line in Slater Avenue draining east-to-west which would allow the Slater
Avenue Pump Station to be removed from service.
Future extensions in Edwards Street northerly to McFadden Avenue including
relief laterals in Heil , Edinger and McFadden would complete the District
No. 11 Master Plan system.
The cost of the needed facilities which would allow abandonment of the
Slater Avenue Pump Station are as follows:
Item 1: Coast Trunk Sewer, Goldenwest Street
at Orange Avenue to Edwards at Slater
Avenue, including Slater Relief $ 9,150,000
Coast Lift Station: 4,100,000
Subtotal : $13,250,000
Edwards Trunk Sewer and Heil , Edinger
and McFadden Relief Lines 6,050,000
Total : $19,300,000
3
District No. 11' s long-term facilities financing plan has been to fund
construction of the Coast Trunk system by developers; to be paid back from
future connection fees under a formal reimbursement agreement arrangement.
Bolsa Chica Annexation
Based on various actions over the last year, indications are that the Bolsa
Chica area, approximately 1520 acres, will soon be developed. District
staff has been invited to discussions with the City, the County of Orange,
other interested agencies and the major landowner relative to this proposed
development.
The principal landowner, Signal Bolsa Corporation, has submitted a request
to annex the territory, which has been received and filed by the Board and
referred for study. The Bolsa Chica area is presently outside the boundary
of District No. 11 but included within its sphere of influence. The
District No. 11 master plan, and more specifically, the Coast Trunk system,
has been designed to provide sewerage service to the Bolsa Chica area on the
assumption that it would eventually annex to the District.
There are several issues that must be addressed in considering the request
for annexation including, but not limited to, the following:
• Compliance with CEQA/EIR requirements
• Funding
• Capital Financing
• Connection Fees
Advance of connection fees by developers to finance
construction of Coast Trunk to be repaid from future
connection fees pursuant to standard reimbursement agreement.
• Annexation Fee
Signal Bolsa Corporation has proposed payment of the
District' s annexation acreage fees on the 657 acres proposed
for development, and requested deferral of fees on 863 acres
which will remain in open space (largely wetlands).
• Operation and Maintenance Financing
• Tax Exchange
District No. 11 operation and maintenance costs are currently
financed by its proportionate share of the ad valorem tax
allocation which presently averages 3.1% of the 1% basic tax
levy. The alternative would be user fees.
• Determination of necessary easements from private property owners or
public right-of-way for sewerage facilities
4
• Local sewers
Local sewer service within the current boundaries of District No. 11
is provided by the City of Huntington Beach. However; Signal Bolsa
Corporation has sponsored a bill in the State Legislature providing
for the formation of the Bolsa Bay Harbor and Conservation District
which; among other things; would be empowered to provide local
sewage collection and treatment services.
Consent of other property owners
Currently there are several other land owners within the proposed
territory to be annexed, including the State of California,
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, W. R. Grace,
Donald Godell ; Huntington Beach Company, and others.
• Advance Funding and Construction Scheduling
• Execution of an agreement with landowner setting forth the
terms and conditions of the annexation
Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer
As previously discussed, construction of the reaches completed to date of
the new Coast Trunk Sewer to Goldenwest Street have relieved the old Ocean
Avenue Trunk Sewer, a 16-inch to 24-inch sewer extending from Goldenwest
Street to Lake Street in the first alley northerly of Pacific Coast Highway.
This sewer was originally constructed by the City of Huntington Beach in
1914. District No. 11 assumed ownership under a purchase agreement from the
City of Huntington Beach in the 1950s. Because of the new Coast Trunk, the
Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer now has little use as a District trunk sewer, but
portions can still serve as an important local collector. The line serves a
drainage area southerly of Walnut Avenue, including portions of the City' s
downtown areas which are redeveloping, and thus could best be managed by the
City of Huntington Beach. Portions of this sewer will need to be abandoned
because certain planned developments will utilize the entire block between
Pacific Coast Highway and Walnut Avenue.
District No. 11 has engaged Boyle Engineering Corporation to study the Ocean
Avenue Trunk Sewer, and preliminary reports are now being reviewed by both
City and District staff. The report identifies which reaches of the Ocean
Avenue Trunk Sewer should be rehabilitated and turned over the City of
Huntington Beach for use as a local sewer, and which reaches will not be
rehabilitated since they will be abandoned (see attached Exhibit B) . The
District estimates that about $300,000 will be required to rehabilitate the
sewer.
Exchange of Service Areas/Boundary Adjustments
An area generally bounded by Garfield Avenue on the south and Beach
Boulevard on the east and the Central Park on the north within District
No. 3 is now served under a basic accommodation agreement by District
5
No. 11 facilities, including the Newland-Delaware gravity sewer and the
�...i Slater Avenue Pump Station. A second area bounded by the Talbert Channel on
the south and west, the Santa Ana River on the east, and Hamilton Avenue on
the north is within District No. 11, but is served largely by District No. 3
sewers. Staff will propose in the near future that these areas be studied
to determine if boundary adjustments between the two Districts would be
appropriate.
Long Range Financial Projections
As mentioned above, the long-range financial plan of District No. 11 for
funding its master planned sewerage facilities provides that the Coast Trunk
system shall be financed by the developers to be repaid from future
connection fees under terms and conditions established in a standard master
plan reimbursement agreement. This policy was reaffirmed in June 1986 when
the Board of Directors in District No. 11 elected to continue the policy of
pay-as-you-go capital financing rather than encumbering a long-term debt by
issuance of certificates of participation.
Attached Exhibit C details the District' s master planned collection system
facilities along with the estimated cost and anticipated schedule of
construction. Exhibit D is an updated ten-year statement of projected cash
flow depicting the estimated financial position of the District. As the
projections indicate, District No. 11 can expect to experience both capital
and operating revenue shortfalls as soon as 1989. It will , therefore, be
necessary for the Board to consider adjusting current fee schedules and
additional revenue sources in order to maintain the District's financial
integrity.
Detailed Report at Adjourned Board Meeting to Review Master Plan and
Proposed Annexation of Bolsa Chica
The Board of Directors of District No. 11 has adjourned to Wednesday, April
15, 1987 at 6:00 p.m. to review the District' s master plan of sewerage
facilities and the request of the Signal Bolsa Corporation to annex the
Bolsa Chica area to the District.
Staff and General Counsel will review this report in detail at the meeting.
6
EXHI IT A
i
24' .1 2' .-
1'—
7'000,
T
tT�J
Yb
21
` 27'
27
U'
4
51'
A
72 ,IPLANT ra[
PS — wa
! x
LEGEND PLANr.2.
PROPOSED SYSTEM CORRECTIONSz
EXISTING TRUNK SEWER
---- EXISTING FORCE MAIN
0 EXISTING PUMP STATION
FUTURE PUMP STATION ""`•�
DISTRICT No. 11 BOUNDARY
DISTRICT NO, 1 1
c
UO/ltltlOdGO�9U/C33U/9U3 3'1A09
g am6� •o
NOI11SOdSla a3SOdOHd
jameS 3junil anuany ueaoO
N73^O I
8 lIBIH%3
COLVIN INVO IVY
} = I l"'!' a IU01'``ll11U UllIuto
m mN m l ;" h 1IL1IU11'I II!Illilllllll L'IIilllll➢lU 'Ul
X9mm KN0 twflllY Jl•^q• SC
in In N a r it II 1' 1 I'I
20m. jz. tw Ill"ll ll:lll I:LI!I:!II:W � 11:; !I I �LIUI
N N,AO
N a n I:.: I!1(Illtlllllll I!illlll!Ililll IlillUU� LIIt1llV
DNWmO2Z tw"il'Imgl
i £9 a E m F O i i� kIUU,�R[Illll�WUUIIUIm ' i 1LLJ'�li I :I
a 0.'m �` Illll!Illil!I I�IIIII f IIIILI •�IUlll;ll!l,l �tllll
m z 9cF
i ima 2 a z
)-. IMfnllElp
cot:,O0 S r p
t: _ , m N IIUI11iLulll lu!Iil'Li6(I Will Iiii L
FmOr�lisF ::;." 'II!1111;I!IJII I!lil!I!Il:ilil lil; Iaa: I,I!l,.Uli
> o
s a
a IIIMIEEP111
R o Llll "!IUI;III U I'UIJIJ flu'�!,!,,��,i� UL> I
w 111 ii!Iliflfl l I�Ilil!Ij III Iailllll) Will III
I ITT. :';I'll WUICI:I:i:I `� 1011 I
f II! Illllili�illlll I':IIIIIIE!iiil _ .`:'�' I�illlli
J VF,tlll •nlq
! ! f !
I G 1 il!li !!i!:��I I;!lil: i'.!,iil Glllililillll GIIIi1;Ui
.i;lil I:(II:I;i.
I!lil IiCllllii'll;l I:I'„LI'i,:;l IIiIIIIIII!U IiIlGiil:
, pill:,•-
! ::( rri Vill1 r ' . l140'! LII I;lII?
r
Wim
I ,1 y m m rt
Is ! c w C I pN
III III
FF °m
I
TI
--7 7 C ._ 1 I I '
T_ -1 .. f I q
! I ICI . ICI !!IIIIII �hI �I i {
III IllNl F'
rr:(!:rlfrl
IC II I
: I:!all'II;0' lfli, u
� LILYIIII
r Illi� , I i I' II III
�- 11!F!::IiuIIIIIJ:111!Il'II ,I111i1!I!II: I
ll!'I`+III;!!ia��ha
I11I,I : . iI
"1'll' I I Ili I'I I I I ,!a I I I'fl I '
III ri
Il 1L' '1 f I ':I!:!IIII I;I Illi!I!!I!IIIII 11'I
' v17T11 . �C�'A�I f1'I'�! Illlfi' TTlllil �i
!Illml'a AT!;.l I I 1 1!111!I IIII!I'I'I►' IIII'
;; � I. ff :;l�l f;IGl �ll] 111111iiil ! nlll €
111 N Ill lNNI <
l�lfl!IIIIIILFII I!If!flll!liIIIIIIJIIIII!!I l
C= m
Is 2 _ F
I"lflnUTI!PilllflMTMIIIIilllil. lil!UIIIIIink, :::'I : .14 3= ° =s ` w
COUNTY SANIIAIION DISTRICT NO.II 419107
SCNEOULE OF DISTRICT COLLECTION MYTH PROJECTS BAIIBI'C C
PROJECT TOTAL 1 C.I.P. 1907-01 l9N-N 19W90 1990-91 1991.92 1992-93 1991.9e
........... ----------- - ----------- ----------- ----------- ---I------- ........... ........... ........... -----------
Radio linkM lelentry (1) I51000 j 15.000
Slater Ave. Popp Station Rehab. (a) 25.0N J 25,OA0
Ocean Assets bank Rehab. (A) 3N,0N J 50,000 250,000
Miscellaneous Projects (a) 175,00D 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
.......__ . . .. --Sub-
total AN Fund 5151000 0 115,000 275,000 25,000 25.000 25,000 25,000 25,000
........... . ._._..._ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Ednrds trunk (3) (b) 3.400,000 ; 3,400,000
Acfsdden Relief Iron% (3) (c) 750.000 J 750,000
Edinger interceptor (3) To) 750.000 ! 750,000
Neil Relief Saner (3) (A) 750,000 750.000
Edinger Serer Parallel (3) (C) 400,000 ; 400,0N
Coast trunk Serer (c)s 7,4N,0N 500,N0 2,900,000 3.500,000 500,000
Slater Relief Line (5) (c)t 1,750.000 100,000 500,000 1.150,000
Coast Nn Station and force
Main (3) Icle 4,1N,000 j 100,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
NisnIlanon Projects (a) 530,000 j 50,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50.000 50,000
........_- J ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Sub-total FR Fund 19,650,0N J 0 750,000 5.450,000 6,700,000 550,000 S0,N0 50.000 6,100,000
........... j __.�. -------I--- .-1-------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---...--... ....I'll...
Sub-Total District Construction 20,165,0N J 0 NS,ON S,725100 6.725,0N SFS,0N 73.00 73,000 6,12S,00
Garfield Runk Senr (7) (C)a 2,000,0N 500,00 1,500,N0
........... j .....-.__ --------.- .._------- ----------- ----------- ----------- .......I... -..........
Sub9otal 0...leper Construction 2,00,000 1 6 0 0 NO.ND 1.S00,00 0 0 0
........... ......._.. ._...._.. ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ........... ...........
GRAND TOTAL 22.165,000 J 0 W,000 sms.oco 7,225,000 2,075,N0 75,N0 75,0N 6,125,000
......... , .... .......mx: ........... ........... .t......... ........... ..........z ...........
(a) fully Funded I. Meter-planed facilities presently under contraction
(b) Partially Funded 2. Masterplanned facilitias presently under deign
(C) Net Funded S. Nailer-plaMM facilities scheduled for future desigalcanstructiob
t project to be Rnaned by developer
under Saar Service Relebursesent Agreesenl
Is Project to be fully financed by dnsloper
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 4109187 CIS IT D
STATENENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1986-27 INROUGH 1995-96 preliminary projection
1991-927
LINE 1996-87 1997-88 1908-89 1989-90 1990-91 $-Year foul 199S-96 10-Yair total
. ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- I ------------ ----------- -------------
OPERATING FOOD
1 Reserves 6 Carry-Owt From Last Year 2,SS7,000 2.222,000 1.919,000 1,399,000 273,000 ; 2,SS7,000 (1,506,000) 2,557.000
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- - ----------- ----------- -----------
REVENUE
2 she'. of It Is.Allocetied 1,934,000 2,202.000 2,482.000 2,198,000 3.154,000 12,510.000 22,908,000 35,490.AND
3 fees 213.000 226,000 236.000 249,000 261,000 1.1@.WO 1.519,000 2,701,000
a Internet 8 miscellaneous Zones 169,000 147,000 110,000 S9,000 0 ; 493,000 0 491,000
S Other Revenue 0 0
'---------' ----------- ---------'- ----------- --'-------- ----------- ----------- •----------
6 TOTAL REVENUE 2,336,000 2,573,000 2,836.000 3,105,000 3,415,000 14.265,000 24,427,000 31.692,000
-'---...... ----------- ........... ........... ........... 1 ----------- ----------- -----------
7 107AL AVAILABLE FUNDING 4,893.000 4,795.000 4.755.400 4.504,000 3,681.000 16,022,000 22,841,000 41.249,000
----------- ........... ........... ........... ........'" , ----------- ........... -----------
EXPENDITURES
8 Share of Joint Works N 6 0 2,236,000 2,375,000 2,731,000 3,141.000 3,612,040 ; 14,095,000 21,009,030 42.104,000
9 Collection Trans N 6 0 and Other Oyer. 435.000 501,000 576,000 AAS,000 762,000 2,937,000 5,905.aA0 8,842,000
10 Other Expenditures 49.M 421,000 y00,000 1,376.000 4,778,040 6,154,000
........... ........... ........... ........... ----------- i --'-'......
11 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,671,000 2,876.000 3.356.000 4,231.000 S,271,000 ( 18,400,000 36,692,000 57,100,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- - -----"---• ----------- ---
12 hums B"try-Over to Meat Year 2.222,000 1,919,OA0 1.399,000 273,000 (l,SB6,000) (1,506,000) (15.851,000) (IS11511000)
13 Net Year's Dry period Fuming Requirements 1,336.000 1,438,000 1,678.000 2,116,000 2,637,000 2,637,000 7,738,000 7,138,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- i ----------- ----------- -----------
16 . Food Golan,or (Deficit) 186,000 4B1,000 (279,000) (1,843,0001 (4,223,000) ( (4,223,000) (23,589,0 0) (23.589.000)
----------- -----r-rM ---'------- -------..:: ---------- ........n: .---------- :c:::s::r::
CAPITAL PUXD(S)
------------- -
1S Reserves 6 Carry-over Free Last Year 0.795,000 1,000,000 6,111,000 1,244,000 (1,915,000) B,79S,000 (3.293,0001 8,79S,000
........... ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- -----------
REVENUE
16 Construction Grant, 166,000 705,000 678.000 670,000 113,000 2,340.00) 113,000 2,453,00D
17 Fees: Contention $30,000 100.000 BOO,000 800,000 800.040 3,730,000 4,00 ,000 7,7M,000
18 Other 60,000 60,000 60,000 60.000 60.000 300,000 S00,e00 600.000
19 Sale of Capacity Rights 24,000 285,000 17.000 1,426,000 814,000 2.566.000 1,130,000 S,696,000
20 Interest a miscellaneps Income 591,000 500,000 261,000 0 0 1,352.00 0 1,351,000
21 Equity Sale W District 14 1,288.000 1,281,000 I,2B8,000
22 Flow-hued Equity Adjusteent 118,000 118.000 118,000
23 Other Inner 140,000 5.100.000 7,1SO.000 2.000.01E 15.250.000 15,2S0,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- i -----... ........... .....--....
24 TOTAL REVENUE 2,777.000 3.050,000 7,216.000 10,114,000 3,187.000 26.911,000 S,513,000 32,687.000
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- '---------- i --- --------_-- ----------- .
25 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 11.572,000 11,052,00D 13.321,000 11.358.000 1,872,000 35,739,000 2,250.000 41,282,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ........... --------'-- I .......-... ----------- ...........
EM UIT D ( `
Pass 2.
heliaieary P,.jecth. •s
1991-M1'
1916-87 1917-88 OW89 1989.90 1990-91 S•9ur Total I995.96 10-year total
WiWDITWE3
.....-------
26 SOAU of Joint Nor" Treataent elect 3.324,000 4,082.000 6,SH,MO 5,648,000 2.690,000 22,102.000 41631,000 26,735,000
21 District Collection IOUs 1/0,OM MS.OM 5,72S,00 7,225,00 2,075,040 I 16,030.000 6,275,000 22,305.000
21 MssOurselenl AOreeaent Payaents /M,OM 400,000 ( 100,000 2,000,000 2,600,OM
29 Flu-based Ewity Adiustasnt 0 0
M OtMr Expenditures 140.OM LM,MO 100,000
........... ........... __--....- •-•--"-'-.. ..-:_ __ i _......... ....__ .... .------_---
31 TOTAL WPENDITWES 3.561.M0 6.911.001 12.4111.01) 13,273,000 5,L65.016 S9,032.000 12,906,000 S1,93B4000
32 laurvn 6 Carry-wer 0 Nut Our 1.041110I _ 6,III.MO 1,244,4110 (1.915.0001 13.291,M l i (3.293,M ) (10.656.000) 110.656,M0)
TWOfUtlDl9) ............ ............ ............ sss:.s-..... -..s.sx---- ------..... ---....-.-. :::..:...--
-.------.-.. ,
33 4serres B Carry-aver Fees Last year 26,010 19.000 II,OM 1,000 0 26,000 0 26,81
..._.--_ ........... ........... ........... ._........ --------- ----------- ..-_------
AEVEAUE
M In to" 63,M1 63,0M 55,000 61.M0 SLIM 1 294,040 214,M0
35 Interest 6 Nisceilanews IncoM 2,400 1.000 1.000 0 1 4,000 D 4.040
36 Othr Imes I 0
«. ..... ........... ........... ........._ ..-..__ ( ._........ __......... --.--•-.-—
37 TOTAL REVERE M.MO d1.M0 S1,000 6/,aM H.MI 296,OM 0 2M,OM
——------ ----I------ ..----....-
H TOTAL AVAILABLE FWDINO 91,IM M,IM M.MI W,MI 51.101 ( 324,000 0 $24.400
WPEADITUIIS )
-.....-.---.
39 Bond principal 1 Interest 72,040 69,M0 67,OM 6S,IM 51.11141 ; 31/,00 321,000
/0 Mor Expenditure j
----------- ----------- •......... .�-__. _.__ ; — ------- ----------- -----.....-
IOTAL M0 M H UPENOITURES nmo 69.000 67, ,MO ,MI AI.OM 0 321,M0
--.�__ _........ ........... _..__.. ..__•__ ( .._---.... -___. ---_-----
1
121 ReaerOd f Gr, OOr M Next Your 19,M0 II,OM I'MO 0 9 ( 0 0 0
/3 Next year's Dry Period Funding R9WLresents I9.M0 11,001) 1,000 0 0 0 0 0
_.-_•__- ----------- ----------- ---------_ _�._� I _._..... .--•-----:- ••---...-_
/1 Fund Balance or (Deficit) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SOCKWAY (Mjeated for Inter-Fund Transfers)
/S -Reserves 1 GrryOver From Last Our 11,378.000 10.249,000 0,044,00 2.6/1,00 (1,642,000) 1 11,116.000 (/,879,000) 11,378,OM
/6 Total AEYWW 5,170,000 5,607.000 10,106.00 13,213,0011 7.255,000 ( 41,507,040 29,970,00D 71,177,0110
_--------- --------- _.....---- ---------•- ---------• • _--------- ----------- .----_--.-
17 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUDINO 16,556,000 15,9H2OM I8,I50,0,MO IS1927,000 S.611,M0 ( H.evi'm 25.091,000 SO.W,OM
/6 TOTAL EIPENDIMES 6,307,00 7,0111,0011 15,157,000 17,142•MO 9.5M,OM I 56,3M,OM 45,820,40D I0,362,M0
... .....'-•_. --------.— .._....... --•-------- I ----------- ----------- -----------
j 19 Reserves B Carry-Over to Next year 10,249,00 I,441,101 2.693.000 (1,215,000) (3,979,M0) ( (3,503,000) (21,729,00) (26,507,000)
SO Next Year's Dry Period Funding ReOoireaentf 1,355,M0 I,/H.MO 1,679,001, 2.116,0011 2,637,01M ; 2,617,00 7,736,OM 1,7n,OM
_-------_ .......— -4......--. ..__.... .......... ( __------ ----------- .-_-------
SI FUND BALANCE 0 (DEFICIT) 1,191,00 6,S92.M0 1,011,040 15.331,M0) (6,616,I01) I (6,I40,OM) (29,167,00) (31,2/5,OM)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CAEIFORNIA
April 9; 1987 10944 EL42 AVENUE
STAFF REPORT Fa BOX 2121
iO WAIN VALUE CAUFORNIA 927MG121
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 a14
1M2 11
MASTER PLAN OF SEWERAGE FACILITIES/PROPOSED BOLSA CHICA ANNEXATION/
LONG TERM FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
Purpose
The purpose of this report is to provide the Board Members with background
information on the long range master plan for providing sewerage services to
District No. 11; particularly as it relates to the request for annexation of
the Bolsa Chica area by the principal landowner, Signal Bolsa Corporation,
and to update the Board on the Districts long-term financial projections.
The report briefly summarizes the major considerations which will be
discussed in further detail at the adjourned meeting of the Board of
Directors on Wednesday, April 15th at 6:00 p.m. They include completion of
the master planned Coast Trunk Sewer Collection System; development of the
Bolsa Chica area, which is surrounded by Sanitation District No. 11 and
included in its sphere of influence; terms of proposed Annexation No. 19 -
Signal Bolsa Annexation; relief of the Slater Avenue Pump Station, which is
nearing capacity; the rehabilitation and ultimate use of the Ocean Avenue
Trunk Sewer; studies for potential future boundary adjustments between
Districts 3 and 11; and financing of the District's capital operating
requirements.
District No. 11 Drainage Area
County Sanitation District No. 11 is split into two separate drainage areas:
the southerly and the northwesterly portions of the City of Huntington
Beach. The southerly portion drains through the existing reaches of the
Coast Trunk Sewer directly to Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach.
The northwesterly portion, bounded by Goldenwest on the east, the San Diego
Freeway on the north and including the Huntington Harbour area, drains to
the Slater Avenue Pump Station between Goldenwest and Gothard, which lifts
water over the Huntington Beach Mesa easterly to the Knott Interceptor and
the Interplant Interceptor, owned jointly with other Districts, and then to
Treatment Plant No. 2.
Master Plan Overview
Since the District's formation, a Coast Trunk Sewer system extending
northwesterly from Treatment Plant No. 2 has been envisioned to serve the
Huntington Beach area. Early studies were based on the assumption that
District No. 11 and the City of Huntington Beach boundaries would be
co-terminous. However, the City first developed in a northeasterly
direction and that portion of the City is now in District No. 3. In the
early 1960's, the development of Huntington Harbour began, and the
boundaries of District No. it were extended westerly to include that area.
1
Sewer master plans and studies have previously been prepared and/or updated
for District No. it in 1947, 1957, 1962, 1970, 1977, and 1981. The current
plan, the Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts
2, 3 and 11, was prepared in 1983 (see attached Exhibit A) .
The master plans have been the basis for the orderly development of the
District' s sewerage system including cost sharing agreements for the Knott
Interceptor (with District No. 3) , the Interplant Interceptor (a District
No. 3/11 and Joint Works project) , and the first reaches of the District No.
11 backbone collector, the Coast Trunk Sewer.
Over the last 10 years, the Coast Trunk Sewer has dominated planning and
construction activities for District No. 11. The sewer has also been
included in the 1977 and 1979 Sewer Master Plans of the City of Huntington
Beach.
In 1979, the first leg of the Coast Trunk Sewer was awarded, extending from
Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach, northwesterly to Lake Street at
Walnut Avenue. The completion of this project allowed the Hamilton Avenue
Pump Station, located at Newland and Hamilton, to be abandoned and also
relieved the Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer and Atlanta Interceptor Sewer. In
1983, the Coast Trunk Sewer was extended to its present terminus, the west
side of Goldenwest Street at Orange Avenue, providing relief for the Ocean
Avenue Trunk Sewer.
The 1983 Master Plan calls for the extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer to
approximately Slater Avenue at Edwards Street. This would provide relief to
the existing Slater Avenue Pump Station. When the Coast Trunk Sewer is
eventually extended in Slater Avenue to just easterly of Goldenwest Street,
the Slater Avenue Pump Station is proposed to be abandoned (discussed more
fully below) .
Upon completion of Coast Trunk Sewer system, District No. 11 could then sell
its capacities in the Knott Interceptor and Interplant line (extending
between Ellis Avenue and Treatment Plant No. 2 in Brookhurst Street) back to
District No. 3.
Planned future extensions to relieve other existing District No. 11
facilities include the Edwards Trunk Sewer, extending to McFadden Avenue
from Slater, and relief lines in Heil , Edinger and McFadden Avenues.
Slater Avenue Pump Station
The existing Slater Avenue Pump Station contains five pumps. The station
currently discharges at a peak rate of 20 million gallons a day (mgd) , the
approximate design flow. Currently, all five pumps in the station are
required to handle the flows. The fifth pump, which would normally be
standby, now runs about 5 percent of the time. This encroaches upon
reliability factors which should be maintained in an essential service
facility of this type. If one of the five pumps were out for an extended
period of time, the station would perform as expected; however, if two pumps
were out, the station would be seriously overloaded. The Districts'
r 2
4
maintenance division is currently providing extra monitoring of this
station to ensure continual operation.
Staff is concerned about continuing and increasing demands being placed on
the Slater Avenue Pump Station. The existing pump station's capacity cannot
be increased and, as pointed out above; is scheduled to be abandoned upon
completion of the Coast Trunk pursuant to the District' s master plan. The
City's planning department has been very diligent in informing District's
staff of pending development tributary to the pump station, but even with a
typical lag time of two to three years between planning inquiries and
move-in for development, staff believes that the pump station reliability
will soon be seriously compromised unless additional improvements are
completed, such as the extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer, or the
construction of new pumping facilities.
Coast Trunk Sewer Collection System
The existing terminus of the Coast Trunk Sewer is the west side of
Goldenwest Street at Orange Avenue. District plans include extending this
54-inch pipe westerly in Palm Avenue to Seaview Avenue, located on the
westerly boundary of the Huntington Mesa. The sewer is then planned to go
northerly in Seaview Avenue along the bluff. Because the northwest portion
of District No. 11 is at much lower elevations, a new pump station will be
needed to lift sewage into the Coast Trunk Sewer, and one of the best suited
sites is on the northerly side of the existing gas plant located in the
bluff area just north of the present terminus of Seaview Avenue. The sewer
would then continue northerly along the base of the Mesa Bluffs to Edwards
Street south of Talbert Avenue, then north in Edwards Street to Slater
Avenue where it would intercept the Springdale Relief Trunk and the
Slater-Springdale Trunk Sewer. Included in the project would be a relief
line in Slater Avenue draining east-to-west which would allow the Slater
Avenue Pump Station to be removed from service.
Future extensions in Edwards Street northerly to McFadden Avenue including
relief laterals in Heil , Edinger and McFadden would complete the District
No. 11 Master Plan system.
The cost of the needed facilities which would allow abandonment of the
Slater Avenue Pump Station are as follows:
Item 1: Coast Trunk Sewer, Goldenwest Street
at Orange Avenue to Edwards at Slater
Avenue, including Slater Relief $ 91150,000
Coast Lift Station: 4,100,000
Subtotal : $13,250,000
Edwards Trunk Sewer and Heil , Edinger
and McFadden Relief Lines 62050,000
Total : $19,300,000
3
V
District No. 11' s long-term facilities financing plan has been to fund
construction of the Coast Trunk system by developers, to be paid back from
future connection fees under a formal reimbursement agreement arrangement.
Bolsa Chica Annexation
Based on various actions over the last year, indications are that the Bolsa
Chica area, approximately 1520 acres, will soon be developed. District
staff has been invited to discussions with the City, the County of Orange,
other interested agencies and the major landowner relative to this proposed
development.
The principal landowner, Signal Bolsa Corporation, has submitted a request
to annex the territory, which has been received and filed by the Board and
referred for study. The Bolsa Chica area is presently outside the boundary
of District No. it but included within its sphere of influence. The
District No. 11 master plan, and more specifically, the Coast Trunk system,
has been designed to provide sewerage service to the Bolsa Chica area on the
assumption that it would eventually annex to the District.
There are several issues that must be addressed in considering the request ! (F
for annexation including, but not limited to, the following: `^
• Compliance with CEQA/EIR requirements 114j,
L
• Funding 1jd
• Capital Financing G
• Connection Fees
Advance of connection fees by developers to finance
construction of Coast Trunk to be repaid from future
connection fees pursuant to standard reimbursement agreement.
• Annexation Fee
Signal Bolsa Corporation has proposed payment of the
District' s annexation acreage fees on the 657 acres proposed
for development, and requested deferral of fees on 863 acres
which will remain in open space (largely wetlands) .
• Operation and Maintenance Financing
• Tax Exchange
District No. 11 operation and maintenance costs are currently
financed by its proportionate share of the ad valorem tax
allocation which presently averages 3.1% of the 1% basic tax
levy. The alternative would be user fees.
• Determination of necessary easements from private property owners or
public right-of-way for sewerage facilities
r./
4
• Local sewers
. /
Local sewer service within the current boundaries of District No. 11
is provided by the City of Huntington Beach. However, Signal Bolsa
Corporation has sponsored a bill in the State Legislature providing
for the formation of the Bolsa Bay Harbor and Conservation District
which, among other things; would be empowered to provide local
sewage collection and treatment services.
• Consent of other property owners
Currently there are several other land owners within the proposed
territory to be annexed, including the State of California,
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, W. R. Grace,
Donald Godell , Huntington Beach Company, and others.
• Advance Funding,and Construction Scheduling
• Execution of an agreement with landowner setting forth the
terms and conditions of the annexation
Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer
As previously discussed, construction of the reaches completed to date of
the new Coast Trunk Sewer to Goldenwest Street have relieved the old Ocean
Avenue Trunk Sewer, a 16-inch to 24-inch sewer extending from Goldenwest
Street to Lake Street in the first alley northerly of Pacific Coast Highway.
This sewer was originally constructed by the City of Huntington Beach in
1914. District No. 11 assumed ownership under a purchase agreement from the
City of Huntington Beach in the 1950s. Because of the new Coast Trunk, the
Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer now has little use as a District trunk sewer, but
portions can still serve as an important local collector. The line serves a
drainage area southerly of Walnut Avenue, including portions of the City's
downtown areas which are redeveloping, and thus could best be managed by the
City of Huntington Beach. Portions of this sewer will need to be abandoned
because certain planned developments will utilize the entire block between
Pacific Coast Highway and Walnut Avenue.
District No. 11 has engaged Boyle Engineering Corporation to study the Ocean
Avenue Trunk Sewer, and preliminary reports are now being reviewed by both
City and District staff. The report identifies which reaches of the Ocean
Avenue Trunk Sewer should be rehabilitated and turned over the City of
Huntington Beach for use as a local sewer, and which reaches will not be
rehabilitated since they will be abandoned (see attached Exhibit B) . The
District estimates that about $300,000 will be required to rehabilitate the
sewer.
Exchange of Service Areas/Boundary Adjustments
An area generally bounded by Garfield Avenue on the south and Beach
Boulevard on the east and the Central Park on the north within District
No. 3 is now served under a basic accommodation agreement by District
5
No. 11 facilities, including the Newland-Delaware gravity sewer and the
.�/ Slater Avenue Pump Station. A second area bounded by the Talbert Channel on
the south and west, the Santa Ana River on the east, and Hamilton Avenue on
the north is within District No. 11, but is served largely by District No. 3
sewers. Staff will propose in the near future that these areas be studied
to determine if boundary adjustments between the two Districts would be
appropriate.
Long Range Financial Projections
As mentioned above, the long-range financial plan of District No. 11 for
funding its master planned sewerage facilities provides that the Coast Trunk
system shall be financed by the developers to be repaid from future
connection fees under terms and conditions established in a standard master
plan reimbursement agreement. This policy was reaffirmed in June 1986 when
the Board of Directors in District No. 11 elected to continue the policy of
pay-as-you-go capital financing rather than encumbering a long-term debt by
issuance of certificates of participation.
Attached Exhibit C details the District' s master planned collection system
facilities along with the estimated cost and anticipated schedule of
construction. Exhibit D is an updated ten-year statement of projected cash
flow depicting the estimated financial position of the District. As the
projections indicate, District No. 11 can expect to experience both capital
and operating revenue shortfalls as soon as 1989. It will , therefore, be
necessary for the Board to consider adjusting current fee schedules and
additional revenue sources in order to maintain the District's financial
integrity.
Detailed Report at Adjourned Board Meeting to Review Master Plan and
Proposed Annexation of Bolsa Chica
The Board of Directors of District No. 11 has adjourned to Wednesday, April
15, 1987 at 6:00 p.m. to review the District's master plan of sewerage
facilities and the request of the Signal Bolsa Corporation to annex the
Bolsa Chica area to the District.
Staff and General Counsel will review this report in detail at the meeting.
6
t-•--�- E%HIBIT A
a.
i 7-
21
5
47 — � 27
fJJ S1
1
Q 1 II
f
72
PS
I --
� W
LEGEND PLANT, 2
PROPOSED SYSTEM CORRECTIONS
EXISTING TRUNK SEWER
--- EXISTING FORCE MAIN \`
EXISTING PUMP STATION
Q FUTURE PUMP STATION w�
DISTRICT No. ; 1 BOUNDARY
DISTRICT No, 1 1
UO/l[l2YOCtJOJ Dul&d 3UYJU3 37^oe
E a�n6i3 .0,
NOIlISOdSIG O3SOdOHd
JamaS )iunil anuany ue930
NIM0 I I
cl
9 lI9IHX3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 4/09/87 ®IBIS D
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLa
FISCAL YEARS ,
THAEON 1995-96 Pnlioinery Projection
92/
5-Year Total LINE 1986-87 1987-G 1911-89 1989-90 1990.91 MS 6 10-Far --GI------
OPERA7106 E40
,
t Aeserrn 1 Corry-Over Fmu brt Year 21551.NO 2.M M 1.919.0E 1,399.000 213,000 2,SS7,000 (1,586,00) 2.557,0E
........... ........_. ......... ....___-- . ........... ----------- ----------- ------.._..
REVENUE
2 Share of 11 Tax Allocation 1.954.000 2.202,000 2.402.0110 2,799.000 5,151,000 12.SE,ON 22,901,000 35,/91,000
` 3 Fees I13,000 224.000 236,No 249,0N 261,000 1,182.000 1,519,0E 2.701,000
/ Interest 6 Hiscellaaoue Isom 169,N0 Ie7,ON III,ON $9,000 0 493,000 0 493,00
1 5 TiMr Grenue 0 0
--------_. _......_. .-_------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
( 6 TOTAL REVENUE 1,3U.ON 2.573,000 2,136.000 3,105,000 3,415,0N 18,265,N0 24,421.040 11,692,040
' . ......... ........... ._........ .......... ----------- ----------- ......----- --- -------
7 TOTAL AVAILABLE ENDING 1,53.0E 4,795,000 0,755,0E 4,501,0E J,688,000 i 16,822.000 22,841,000 81,249,000
---........ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- - ----------- ----------- -----------
EIPODIMES
8 Share of Joint Yorks A A O 2,236,0E 2,375.0E 2,731,0E 3,141,0E 3,612,000 14,095,000 21,09,NO 41.1E,00
9 CORICtieo Systa N A 0 Rod Dthr bar. 11 135,0E 501,00 576,000 663,ON 762.N0 2.937,000 5,E5.N0 8,112,N0
10 Other Imoditures y„�i �� 49,000 827,0E E0,E0 1.376,000 1,771,E0 6,151.N0
---_._... _......... --------- ----------- --------- ----------- ...........
11 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,671.0E 2,876,ON 3.3E,000 1,231,0E 5.2711H O i 11,401,0E 38,692.ON0 57,I00,E11
........... ......... ..._...... ........_. .._..._.- i ........... ........... ...........
12 Reserves A tarry-Over G Nest Far 2,222,000 MESA" 1.SN,NO 113,0E (1m5oo.Ml i (1m566,ON) MISS) M) (IS,151,E0)
l3 Net Fear's Dry Period Funding Requiresents 1,S16,ON I'myoN 1.670,000 2.111,E0 2,611,0E ; 2,631,E0 7,711,0E 7,731,00E
i _._... _......... .__...... --.._..... .._....... . ......_... ----------- ------....-
/1 Fund Balance or (Deficit) -_016.000 "I'm (271,000) (1,843.000) (1.223.0E) (1,223,No) (23,5119,000) (23,519.000)
CAPITAL FEDIS) i
IS Raerm 1 Carry-over Fred Last Year �`)� 1.715.0E 1.0N.000 {,III,IN 1,211,0E (I.M,N0) i 1,71S.E0 (S.M. o) 1,795,Ne
-------- ... ..._._. ----------- ......—._ ...._.—.'. '.._._._ ..._._
RREVENUE ...._..._
16 Construction Trusts % 106.0E 705,0E 411,00 678,00 MAN 2,340.0E 113,000 2,153,0E
i 17 Fees: Connection r S30,000 BN.000 Room NOON BE,NO 3,730,0E 4.00,E0 7,730.ON
i 11 Other 2 ` /--40;0E oo,OE 60. 40,000 3E,E0 SN,040 NOON
l9 Lla of CuedcitY Ai9Ats 2/,000 285,00E 11,0E 1,126,N0 81/,00 2.Sff,ND 1,130,1E 3,6N,NO
( 20 Interest a miscellaneous Inca, 591,000 No 261,000 0 1.352,000 0 1,352,0E
i 21 Equity Sale to District 1/ 1,291,0E I,M,N0 1,3E.040
1 22 Fla-based Equity Mlustant 118,0E 111,0E 116,E0
23 Other Innon Ioo.m S,400,00 7,I50,140 2,040.040 15.250,NO 15,250,N0
2a TOTAL REVENUE 2,777,E0 3.050,000 7.216,0E 10,111,000 3,7/7.000 26.941,000 5,S13,0E 32,117,0E
25 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 11,572.000 11,050,000 13,327,0E 11.351,000 1.172.000 35,739,0E 2.250.0410 11,212,ON
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .--------
EM31111C n
Page 2
Preliminary Projection
199S_92/
1906-81 1981-018
i -....-• -"-.- -a - 1 5-yeas Total 1995-% 10-Tu fatal
---_-- ----"-- ----
-•
EXPENDITURES
•---_•-•-•- _.-__ _._.
26 Share of Joint Boris Treatment Plant 3,324,000 4,082,000 6,S58_000 5,618,000 2,690,000 1 22,IO2,000 1,01.0111A 2{,73S,Ow
27 District collection system 1/O,aO B65,Ow 5,I2S,w0 7,7J5,0w 2,O/S,Ow 16,Ow,Ow {,215,010 2l,w5,Ow
28 Reimbursement Agreement Patients 400.000 00,000 w0,Dw 2,a1,a0 2,100,O10
29 Fin-band Equity Adjustment 0 a
iw Other Expenditures •Iw,.w i I001000 Iw,Ow
31 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,561,000 1,917,000 12,Oww0 0, 13.273. 0 5,165,0011 a,w 9a Ow 2,0D0 12, ,000 51,9u,
32 Rnerues 1 Carry-ner to Meet yur B.ON.Ow -1.2N.a1- (1,91S,Oa1 (3,293,Ba1 i (3,291,0a1 (10,656.0a) (10,656,Oa)-
BOND MO(S)
31 Aemerves B Grry-Over Frem tut year 26.41011 19 BAN 14,000 1.000 0 26.00 a 26,000
--------- ------- -- - '------- --------- -_---" ----------- -----------
REVENUE
It In Levy 63,000 63,000 53,000 6/,000 51,Ow 1a,a1 294,005
35 Interest 6 Nisnllannus Income 2,w0 1,000 1,000 0 0 l I,1110 0 4,000
36 Other Intone ' 0
i
37 TOTAL REVENUE 65,Ow 61,040 S4,000 61,00 51,00 MOBO 0 218,000
SB TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 91,000 83,000 68,Ow 65.000 511000 SH.00 0 324,000
--_---- __------- `-_------. ----------- ---- ----. --------'-- -----------
EXPENDITURES ,
---------_--
39 Bond Principal \ Interest 72,a0 69,a0 67.000 65,0w $1,O0 S26,a1 324,000
10 Other Expenditures ,
/l wlAl EXPENDITURES 72,O011 69,00 67,Oa 65,O00 SI�,Oa i1 a1,a0 --_ 0- _ 32/.w0
12 Reserves \ Wry-Over to Neel yes, 19,w0 , a,0a I,a0 0 ( 20 0 0 0
I3 Next year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19,Ow II,NO -• - 1.0a- 0 `--•.0 ( 0 1 0
- 19'M ----_--- -------_ 1 -._._
/1 Fund Balance or (Deficit) 1 0 0 0 0 ; 0 0 0
SUNXABy (Adlmeted I., mau-Fund Transfers)
/5 Rmeervos a GrtY-0rer From tut Ynr 11, 006 10,249.0a I,IN,w f6Nw�1 ,O 6/7,0w 0a 1 I 11,BAN, (/,879,0w) 11,578,000
16 TOTAL REVENUE 5,178.Oa S,a7,Ow IO,Ia,000 I1.L1,000 �;253,w0 i II,w1,0011 19,970,000 71.477.000
------ ---------_ -_--__ ..-m__ _-------- , -••------_� ••--------- ...........
1/ TOTAL AVAILABLE fUXDIX6 I6,556,Ia 15,9l6,Oa IB,Iw,w0 13,921,Oa 5,611,Oa 'xii- gS,a1,w0 B2.8551000
IB TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6.307.00 1.M M 15.457,000 17.142,Ow 9,690,000 56,3a,040 46,120,000 1a,362,000
j 19 Reserves\Carry-Omer w Next year 10,2/9,w0 B4ON,Oa 2,69l,Ow (1,21S,0a� 19,Oa) ( (J,507, --• (fl,129,Ow1 126,w1,wo1
50 Next Year's Dry marine Funding Rewireaents I,SSS,0a 1,152,ow 1,679.040 `2,I16,a8 , 2.137,014 7,738,000 7,738,000
51 FOND BALANCE 0 (DEFICIT) 8.191.000- •6.92-000 -L,011-0a' (3.32.a0) (6.616,Oa) ( ({,1/O.Ow1 (29.161.000) (34.245,000)
CWNTY SRNITAQON GISTAICT N0.11 419187
SCREW OF I SIRICI COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS EXHIBIT C
PROJECT TOTAL C.I.P. 1987-W 1988-09 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94
........... ----------- 1 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Radio tinted %mastry (a) 15,000 ; 15,000
Slater Ave. Pop SWAP Rehab. (a) 2S,p0 ; 25,000
0eern Avenue Trunk Rehab. (a) 3W,W0 ! 50,00 250.00
Niscellaneoes Project, (A) 175,000 23,000 25,440 25,UW 25,000 25,000 25.000 25,00
----------- - ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Dub-Wtal ACO TOM 5151000 0 113,00 275,40 25,000 25,000 25,400 25,000 25,000
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
Edeares Trunk (3) IN) 3,40,00 ; 3,400.WO
Rcfadden Relief trunk (3) (c) 750,000 ; 750,0W
Edinger Interceptor (3) (c) 750.000 ! 750,040
Neil Relief son, (3) (a) 750,000 ; ISO,000
Edinger Spar Parallel (3) (c) 400,000 ( 00,000
Copt Trunk Sever (c)t 7,400,000 SW,OW 2,900.000 3,500,000 500,000
Slater Relief line (3) (c)t 1,750.POP i 100.000 SW,000 111501010
Coast Pump Station and Force
Main (3) (e)t 4,10,40 ( 10,000 2.000,000 2.00,000
A1sCollanuus Projects (a) 550,000 $0,000 SO,WO 50,000 50,OW SO,oW $0,000 5o,000
----------- I ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Sub-total FR Fund 19,650,000 0 750,000 5,450.040 6.700.000 550,000 $0.00 SO,OW 6,I00,00
........... ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Sub-TOtal District Construction 20.165.000 0 865,000 5.725.000 6,725,000 575.000 75,000 75,000 6.125,00
........... i ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
CarfUld Trunk Stlar (3) (c)tt 2,000,000 50,000 115001000
........... i ........... ---------- ----------- ----------- ........... ----------- ........... ...........
Sub-total 0ueloper Contraction 2,000,000 0 0 0 SO0,000 I.W01000 0 0 0
........... ........... ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- .---.------
CRANO TOTAL 22,16S,000 0 865,000 5,725,00 7.225,000 21075,000 75,OW 7S,000 6,123,00
(a) Fully ranged I. Naster-planned facilities presently ardor Construction
(b) Partially Funded 2. Rasta-planned facilities Presently under design
(c) Not Funded S. Mater-planned facilities scheduled for future desigaleoutruction
t PCojpl to be financed by developer
Ungar Suer Service Remburnment Agreeeent
an Project to be fully fine aced by developer
MEETING DATE April 15, 1987 TIME 6:00 pm DISTRICTS 11
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
(EDGAR)........HOESTEREY..._ _ _ (PICKLER)..........SAY.........
_
(CRANK)........HANSON...... _ _ (FRIED)............BI60NGER...._
"NO" (YOUNG)........GRISET... _ _ (NORBY)............CATLIN......
(ROTH).........STANTON.....= _ _ (RISHER)...........CLIFT.......
(PLUMMER)..........COX.........
DISTRICT 2 (PERRY)............CULVER......
(KENNEDY)..........EDGAR.......
(NORBY)........CATLIN...... _ _ (MC COME)..........GRIFF IN.....
(KEDEL)........MAHONEY..... _ _ (YOUNG)............GRISET......
(PICKLER)......DAY......... _ _ (CRANK)............HANSON......
(FRIED)........BIGONGER...._ _ _ (COX)..............HART........
(YOUNG)........GRISET...... _ _ (EDGAR)............MOESTEREY..._ _
(NEL SON).......LEYTON...... _ _ (CORONADO).........KAREL.......
(SCOTT)........NEAL........ (WINCXELL).........KELLY.......
(DOWNEY).......NEWTON...... _ _ (EDGAR)............KENNEDY.....
(CUL'ER).......PERRY......._ _ _ (NELSON)...........LEPTON...... _
(FASB ENDER)....SILZEL...... _ _ (WEDEL)............MAHONEY.....
(PEREZ)........SMITH....... _ _ (PLUMMER)..........MAURER......
(ROTH).........STRNTON....._ _ _ (GREEN. P).........MAYS........ _
(AGRAN)............MILLER. S..._
DISTRICT 3 (BIGONGER).........MURPHY......
(SCOTT)............NEAL........
(HERMAN).......POLIS ...... (SUTTON)...........NELSON......
(NEISXAUPT)....SAPIEN......_ _ _ (DOWNEY)...........NEWTON......
(PICKLER)......BAY......... _ _ (CULVER)...........PERRY.......
(NORBY)........CATLIN....... _ _ (HERMAN)...........POLLS.......
(RISHER).......CLIFT.......� _ _ (NEISHAUPT)........SAPIEN......_
(PERRY)........CULVER......� _ _ (WILES)............SIEFEN......
(MC CUNE)......GRIFFIN..... _ _ (FASBENDER)........SILZEL......_
(YOUNG)........GRISET...... _ _ (PEREZ)............SMITH......._ _
(CORONADO).....KANEL....... _ _ (ROTH).............STANTON....._ _
(KINCHELL).....KELLY.......__ _ _ (NELSON)...........SUTTON......_
(KEDEL)........MAHONEY....._ _ _ (MILLER. D)........SWAN........_ _
(SCOTT)........NEAL........ (SELVAGGI).........SYLVIA......
(SUTTON).......NELSON......__. _ _ (GREEN.H/JOMNSON)..WAHNER......
_
(WILES)........SIEFEN......_
(ROTE).........STANTON....._
(SELVAGOI).....SYLVIA......_
STAFF:
DISTRICT 5 SYLVESTER CLARKE......✓
CAWES.......J�
(COW)..........MART........ _ _ ANDERSO ....ems
(ROTH).........COX.........— _ _ BUTLER......
(ROTH) _ _ BUTLER......
B ........
ur
DISTRICT 6 ,,
KYLE .......J�
KYLE.........
( )......M AER......— __ YIN LRNGEN
(PLUMMER ......MAURER KINSOR......
(ROTH).........
STANTON.....
STREED......._BC CLAWSO
CLAKSON.....
DISTRICT 1 LOOTEN INDER.......
UNDER......
(ABRAM)........MILLER......� DEBLIEUX......
(PLUMMER)......COX.... 5... — _ TALEBI......
(PLUNGER)......COX........._ _ _ MOLL........
(YOUNG)........SMISET TH......._
(ROTH).........SMITH.......
(ROTE).........STANTON ER......
_
(GREEN, X).....WAKAXNER......� _ QJff AWOODRUFF TKINS......�C
HOHENS......_
DISTRICT 11 HOWARD...........
(RITH)...).....KELLY STANTON..
✓ HUNT........
(BOTH).........MAYS........ — — KEITH NOPF.......J�
(GREEN. P).....NRYS........y�_ _ LINDSTRO ..._
LINCH......._
DISTRICT 13 LYNCH.......
(NELSON).......MUTTDN...... YOUNG.......
_
((BIGONEER).....SAY.........
PICNLER)......BAY.........._
(PEREZ)........SM1 TH.......
(ROTH).........STANTON.....
_ _ C { CJ+aLt�A��✓�'�
\-w/ DISTRICT lA
(AGRAN)........MILLER. S...
(MILLER. D)....SWAN........
(EDO")........KENNEDY....._ _ __
(PEREZ)........SNITH......._
(ROT,).........STANTON....._
OA/O9/87
PLEASE SIGN IN
DISTRICT 11 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, April 15, 1987 - 6: 00 P.M.
NAME: FIRM OR AGENCY:
WOOD (WA wo/UEtwJ (S/&IvgI)
C�-�•�-cps-.`-
�1.l5dfl�
u_3&teE.�s ems. � ha�x-ytt�►ul�,y
DISTRICT 11 ADJOURNED MEETING NOTES
APRIL 15, 1987 - 6:00 P.M.
$2(a)&(b) - Staff report re Dist's Master Plan & annexation of Bolsa Chica area
Tan Dawes addressed the Board and referred to the written staff report mailed to
Directors. He then pointed to various maps on the wall as he reported that when
District 11 was formed in 1947, the District's boundary was coterminous with
that of the City of Huntington Basch. As the City expanded easterly, part of
the City was in District 3. 60% is in District 11 and the rest is in
District 3. In the center of the District is the Bolsa Chios area. Over the
years the southeast part of the District has been sewered through individual
collectors owned by District 11 which drain into facilities awned by District 3.
Beginning in 1979 District 11 started its own Master Plan collection system with
the Coast Trunk Sewer which began at the Huntington Beach treatment plant and
extended northwesterly along the beach. Over the last 15 years the Coast Trunk
Sewer has dominated planning and construction activities in District U.
He continued to review the attached report re [rester plan overview. Tan
mentioned that rehabilitation of the Ocean Avenue Trunk, which was purchased
from the City of Huntington Beach, would cost about $300,000. Large portions of
it will be abandoned so they won't have to be rehabilitated. Chairmen Kelly
camiented that $300,000 doesn't sound like much for so large a project. He
clarified that this is not a part of the annexation issue. Tam Dawes stated
that that was correct.
Tan then reported on the Signal Bolsa request for annexation of 1,520 acres. He
advised that Signal Boles. and the District's staff are working on an agreement
to complete the annexation and fund advances by Signal Bolsa. The annexation is
proposed in two parts. The annexation and payment of fees on 650 acres which
would be inhabited, and the payment of fees on the second part—about 900 acres
which would largely be wetlands and other uses which would be transferred to
other public agencies—would be deferred. It would be annexed but part of the
fees not paid until later when it is developed. The fees would be due and
collectible then.
Kelly stated that the 900 acres of wetlands must be maintained. Asked if we
were suggesting that there is not a need for sewage disposal with regard to the
oil industry? Tan Dawes replied no, he was referring to residential use. This
area would not be eligible for anyone, including the oil operation. If oil
operator wants to discharge oil or brine, they would have to make arrangements
with our industrial waste Department and would pay considerable fees to do so.
Kelly camiented further on the sewage potential of the oil industry. Thought we
have to reconsider whether this area should be deferred or not. Tom agreed that
there are a lot of things to study and that is one of then.
Tan added that one important consideration is the CEQA documents which must be
completed. Right now it hasn't been decided how they will be handled. Another
big issue is funding. The District does have a considerable need for funds.
Capital financing must be considered very carefully. The Bolsa Chica area
cannot receive sewer service without completion of the Coast Trunk Sewer.
Connection fees and annexation fees are part of an agreement that is being
studied by staff and legal counsel. Another concern is operations and
maintenance funding. A tax exchange is one option. we also need to obtain
easements from the landowners in order to construct the Coast Trunk Sewer.
There are also local issues to be considered. The Sanitation Districts do not
provide the local sewer service.
There are 8 or 9 property owners of the territory within the proposed Signal
Bolsa Annexation. All the others must agree or not be included in the
�..i annexation.
Question was asked by member of the public, how long will construction of the
Coast Trunk Sewer take to the Bolas Chica area? Tan Dawes advised 2-3 years but
that time will start when funding sources are identified. Pia have done some
preliminary studies and Signal Bolas has done sane. Have a good idea on an
alignment but have only done just some rough cost estimates.
Tan then reported the long-range plan for the District will relieve the Slater
Pump Station. It is just about at capacity now. It serves a very large portion
of Huntington Beach. It is now discharging about 20 mgd peak flow which is what
it was designed for. He added that the City of Huntington Beach has always kept
the District informal on future plans and we know what is caning in the next few
years. We feel that asmnents given to the City have been on target. Caments
we make today won't be on line for 2-3 years. Are at a point where we have to
put warning out. Can't accept any large develooments. Have to add to it or
make a new pump station. Mst go ahead with Coast Trunk Sewer and add on to the
pump station or stop future development.
Director Kelly added that the Slater Pub Station is an integral part and must
be addressed with regard to the entire potential of the Bolsa Chica land mass.
#2(c) - Financial Report
The Director of Finance reviewed the three major categories of the District's
budget—Operating Fund, Expenditures 5 Revenue. See Exhibit "C" in attached
Staff Report. He advised that for the joint treatment facilities and
collection facilities we routinely carry forward reserves. The District's
primary source of revenue is our historical share of the 14 property tax
allocation. The tax exchange issue is of significant concern to the District.
With regard to fund balance or deficit, in 1986-87 there is a positive balance
but by 1990-91 the District moves into a negative deficit position for the next
five years. The preliminary reason for this is that our costs for operating the
joint treatment facilities have been going up about 15% and tax revenues have
not gone up in corresponding amounts. District 11 has to undertake a program
to receive some tax exchange or establish a supplemental user fee, such as
Districts 1, 5, 6 and 13 have established already.
With regard to the capital fund, District 11 has chosen to operate on a
pay-as-you-go basis. We don't have any control over revenue sources such as
construction grants. This is based on our estimate of what is going to happen
in Sacramento and Washington re construction grants. Explained procedure re
obtaining grant monies. Commuted that connection fees fluctuate depending on
development. At the beginning of the year we project $925,000 in connection
fees but now we estimate $430,000 based on our discussion with the City. (line
#17 says $530,000 M. The City does project development to continue at a
reasonably high level over the next five years.
Kelly asked if the proposed redevelopment is reflected in the estimates through
1990-91? Bill Butler replied yes, he obtained information fran their Planning
Department and Redevelopment Agency.
-2-
Bill further reported on revenue sources from industrial waste fees and from the
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority who has an agreement to purchase up to
30 mgd of rapacity in the treatment facilities from the Districts. District 14
has also purchased equity from the District. Line 23 represents monies from
-..s reimbursement agreements. Will need to construction major facilities to support
annexation we are talking about. We project income from advance funding will
coincide with the cost of the annexation.
Director Stanton asked re Exhibit "D", what are your confidence levels as to tow
accurate your projections are? Bill replied 90-95% except for construction
grants which is maybe 50%.
Director Kelly questioned line 19, why so mach up and down in that income? Bill
advised that it has to do with When SAWPA actually purchases capacity from the
District. District 11's share of the purchase is 2 mgd in 1987-88 and in
1989-90 will purchase 5 mgd.
Be bond funding, by the end of the five-year period, will have retired all
outstanding bonds (1951 & 1958).
In summary, Bill stated that the District's current fond balance if $8.9 mullion
but over the next 10 years the trend is downward. As major facilities are
constructed at the treatment plants and collection facilities built, the Board
will need to address supplemental user fees as well as increases to their
connection fees and other revenue sources. Director Kelly added that these
will have to be formulated within the next two years. Bill indicated that it is
the District's practice to Come to the Directors with What we believe are the
most optimistic projections on expenditures and the most conservation on
revenues so, hopefully, projections are pretty close to worst case. Also, we
can't always move forward as agressively as we might like with construction
plans.
Kelly asked if District 11's fund balances were the most outstandingly
vulnerable in the entire system? Bill replied no, don't think District 11 is
terribly vulnerable. Of the nine Districts, some Districts do have funds for
their requirements for the next 5-10 years but others who have already
implemented a supplemental use fee are in worse condition, and on a routine
basis they have to address fee increases. District ll has managed to continue
on a pay-as-you-go basis even after Prop. 13 when their major source of income
was cut.
Kelly then asked, when and if Bolsa Chica is annexed, will that be a negative or
positive impact? Bill advised that staff wants to create a situation in which
we have sufficient funds on the capital side to be able to finance the
facilities to support the annexation in advance of the annexation. Don't want
to have a negative impact on our financial condition.
Director Mays asked about the operation and maintenance costs and wondered if
they would be part of the annexation agreement. Bill replied the O & M costs
are a broader issue and would not focus on any particular annexation to pay
then.
Director Stanton questioned line 49 re reserves and carry-over. The same
figures did not carry over each year. Also sane columns didn't add uD across.
�.d Bill Butler indicated that this is in error and would be corrected.
-3-
Bill Holman of the Huntington Beach Company asked if there had been any
discussion regarding changing the District 11 connection fees on a District-wide
basis whether or not the annexation moved forward? Tom Dawes stated that there
were two areas he thought Mr. Holman was talking about. one area in District 3
is largely undeveloped. Sane of the area is served by the Slater Pimp Station
and the other by gravity trunks. The second area is in District 11 but it
served by District 3 facilities, of great concern to the Districts is the
portion which is served by Slater Pump Station which pays connection fees of
$250 per unit to District 3. District 11's fee is $1250. We are evaluating
recommendations and will bring then to the Directors at a later date. Have
several options—detach territory and annex to District 11 or sell capacity,
etc. Stanton strongly stated that of those alternatives, why don't you pick
the easiest one? To sell capacity sounds absurd. Detachment sounds much
easier. Tbm Dawes agreed and said he planned to discuss this with District 3 at
a meeting in May.
Kelly asked is this to do with the Holm Chica area? He was answered, no, just
has to do with the Slater Pinup Station. A large part of the area is owned by
the Huntington Beach Company. Kelly asked why there was such a disparity
between the connection fees of the two Districts. Tom advised that the
connection fees are different in all nine Districts based on the individual
needs and requirements. Each individual Board of Directors decides. District 3
will be considering increasing this too.
Bill Holman then asked if other areas within District 11 not tributary to
District No. 3 would be paying additional connection fees? Tom replied yes, the
staff's recommendation would deal with the entire area.
Tan added that District 11 has expended $11 million to date to build the Coast
Trunk Sewer.
Carl Neuhausene from Signal Iaudmark commented regarding the actual agreement
that had been tendered by Signal Bolsa and said he would like to explain the
relationship between the District No. 11 and special districts. He also
indicated that he had brought consultants with him to speak to the Board-Gary
Woods from IWA Engineering and Russ Behrens, legal counsel for Signal Holes.
Director Stanton asked if our staff and attorney had look over the agreement
yet? Tan Woodruff replied yes but it is unacceptable in its present form.
Stanton then stated that he was not particularly open to this discussion before
the District's attorney had brought the agreement to the Directors' attention.
Chairman Kelly added that because of the complexity of the document, he felt
that the Directors mast wait until the staff had a fairly fianite descriptive
analysis to present to the Board. Can't really discuss a document that they
don't even have in front of then at this time. Said it would be relatively
wasteful to take the time.
Stanton stated that when staff brings agreement to Board, Signal Holm could
speak then. Signal Holm said they would hold their comments until that time
then. With regard to special districts, this matter is pending before the
legislature. At this point the measure hasn't been enacted and it is premature
to have the Sanitation Districts discuss it.
The General Manager said that concluded the staff reports. No questions.
`.s
-4-
Chairman Kelly summarized a few observations he had made. At the present time
based on the request received by the District, the Hoard of Directors has the
following options: (SEE ALSO attached Memo of GC)
(1) Approve request and adopt resolution initiating annexation procedures
a.i (2) Deny request on the basis that it is not in the best interests of the
District.
(3) Take no formal action, but refer the natter to staff for further study
and report back to the Board at a later date.
He added that he would like to have sore research on what the potential
requirements may be for the oil industry regarding disposal of whatever is
generated where sewage may coma into the question. The Hoard must consider
revisions re taxes and fees and maintenance of wetlands in perpetuity.
Kelly added that he understood that developer will provide capital financing.
operation and maintenance financing relates to an unusual situation re HH 6
payback and other agencies re wetlands (??) Will take quite a bit of review.
Easements from private property owners could be related directly or indirectly
to deferred annexation situation. If that is deferred, easement problem may be
a problem.
Director Mays then moved: That the matter of annexation of the Bolas Chica area
be referred to staff to meet with the City and representatives of Signla Holm
and other property owners affected and get back with District 11 at a later
date. Also requested that staff take recommendations and report back to Board
in detail on some of the issues expressed here tonight such as specific plan of
service; how much the service will cost; and where the money will be coming
from. Would like to see an estimate of what tax revenues would be caning in.
Also an estimate of the service area which affects how we would be able to
balance this out without affecting the rest of District 11. ???
b+otion seconded by Stanton and carried.
Kelly requested that in deference to the developer, he would like to ask staff
informally to review this matter as rapidly as possible and establish the term
of "later date". Proposed that the this be brought back to the next District 11
meeting which is the May Joint Board meeting on May 13, 1987.
� -5-
MONTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINVffi OF ADJOURNED RBX AR MEETING
April 15, 1987 - 6:00 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of April 8, 1987, the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California,
met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the
District's Administrative Office.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. The roll was called and
the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRMIMS PRESENT: Jack Kelly, Chairman, Tom Mays,
Roger R. Stanton
Dmxi rc RS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita
J. Brawn, Secretary, 'ltqmas M. Dawes,
William H. Butler, Gary Streed, Hilary
Baker,
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Don R. Griffin, Joint Chairman,
Milo Keith, Bill Hartge, Victor Leipzig,
Paul Cook, Richard Barnard, Bill Holman,
Grace Winrwull , Carl Neuhausen, Jerry R.
Wood, Susan Hori, Russel Behrens
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Review of Master Plan of Trunk The Director of Engineering reviewed the
Sewers to serve the District and current District's Master Plan of
long-term financial projections re Sewerage Facilities adopted in 1982. ,
capital and operating requirements County Sanitation District No. 11 is
split into two separate drainage areas.
The southerly portion drains through the existing reaches of the Coast Trunk
Sewer directly to Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. The northwesterly
portion, bounded by Goldenvsst on the east side and the San Diego Freeway on the
north, including the Huntington Harbor area, drains to the Slater Avenue Pump
Station between Goldenwest and Gothard, which lifts water over the Huntington
Beach Mesa easterly to the Knott Interceptor and the Interplant Interceptor,
owned jointly with other Districts, and then to Treatment Plant No. 2.
Since District U's formation a Coast Trunk Sewer system extending northwesterly
from Treatment Plant No. 2 has been envisioned to serve the Huntington Beach
area. Early studies were based on the assumption that District No. 11 and the
City of Huntington Beach boundaries would be coterminous. However, the City
first developed in a northeasterly direction and that portion of the City is now
in District No. 3. In the early 1960's the boundaries were extended westerly to
y, include the Huntington Harbor area.
-1-
District 11
04/15/87
Master Plans have been the basis for orderly development of the District's
sewerage system since 1947. The current Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers
for Districts 2, 3 and it was prepared in 1982. For the last 10 years, the Coast
Trunk Sever has dominated planning and construction activities in District
No. 11.
In 1979 the first leg of the Coast Trunk Sewer was awarded, extending from
Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach northwesterly to Iake Street at walnut
Avenue. Completion of this project allowed the Hamilton Avenue Pump Station,
located at Newland and Hamilton, to be abandoned and also relieved the
Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer and Atlanta Interceptor Sewer.
In 1983 the Coast Trunk Sewer was extended to its present terminus, the west side
of Goldenwest Street at Orange Avenue, providing relief for the Ocean Avenue
Trunk Sewer.
The 1982 Master Plan calls for the extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer to
approximately Slater Avenue at Edwards Street. This would provide relief to the
existing Slater Avenue Pump Station. Wben the Coast Trunk Sewer is eventually
extended in Slater Avenue, to just easterly of Goldenwest Street, the Slater
Avenue Pump Station is proposed to be abandoned.
Upon completion of the Coast Trunk Sewer system, 'District No. •ll could then sell
its capacities in the Knott Interceptor and Interplant line (in Brookhurst Street
between Ellis Avenue and Treatment Plant No. 2) back to District No. 3.
Planned future extensions to relieve other existing District No. 11 facilities
include the Edwards Trunk Sewer, extending to McFadden Avenue from Slater, and
relief lines in Heil, Edinger and McFadden Avenues.
Mr. Dawes advised that the Slater Avenue Pump Station currently discharges at a
peak rate of 20 million gallons a day, the approximate design flaw. Currently,
all five pumps are required to handle the flows. The fifth pump, which would
normally be a standby pump, now runs about five percent of the time. He
expressed the staff's concern relative to the reliability of this essential
service facility with the continuing and increasing demands being placed on the
Slater Avenue Pump Station. If two pugs were out of service, the station would
be seriously overloaded. The Districts' Maintenance Division is currently
providing extra monitoring of this station to ensure continual operation.
The Director of Engineering then reviewed proposed upcoming projects in
connection with Coast Trunk Sewer collection system, and the estimated costs for
construction of several relief lines needed, as well as a new pump station
required to lift sewage into the Coast Trunk Sewer from the lower elevations in
the northwest portion of District No. U. The total cost of the facilities
needed which would allow abandonment of the Slate: Pum¢) Station is approximately
$19,300,000. This is in addition to the $11,000,000 spent to date for the first
two reaches of the Coast Trunk Sewer.
He also noted that completion of the Coast Trunk Sewer thus far has enabled
relief of the Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer. A consultant has been engaged to study
the Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer and recommend which portions of the sewer should be
rehabilitated and turned over to the City of Huntington Balch for use as a local
sewer and which should be abandoned. It is estimated that about $300,000 will be
needed to rehabilitate the Line.
-2-
District ll
04/15/87
The Hoard briefly discussed the possibility of adjusting the boundaries of
Districts 3 and 11 in order to eliminate the need for the Basic Accommodation
Agreement between said Districts. It provides for District No. 11 to serve an
area in District No. 3 generally bonded by Garfield Avenue on the south, Beach
Boulevard on the east and Central Park on the north; a second area, bounded by
the Talbert Channel on the south and west, the Santa Ana River on the east, and
Hamilton Avenue on the north, is within District No. 11 but is served largely by
District 3. Staff reported that a study of these areas will be undertake., in the
near future to determine if boundary adjustments are appropriate.
The Director of Finance then addressed the Board and reviewed long-term financial
projections relative to the District's capital and operating requirements. He
pointed out that the primary ware of revenue has been the District's share Of
the property tax allocation. District 11's long-range financial plan for funding
its master planned sewerage facilities provides that the Coast Trunk Sewer system
shall be financed by the developers to be repaid from future connection fees
under terms and conditions established in a Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement.
This policy was reaffirmed in June 1986 when the Board of Directors elected to
continue their policy of Fay-as-you-go capital financing rather than encumbering
a long-term debt by issuance of certificates of participation.
Mr. Butler commented on the schedule of collection system projects proposed over
the next ten years. He also reviewed in detail various cash.flow projections to
outline the impacts on the District's long-range financial position. He noted
that based on the estimates at this time the District could experience both
capital and operating shortfalls and move into a deficit position as soon as
1989. The major reason for this is the increased costs to operate the joint
treatment works without a corresponding increase in tax revenues. It was pointed
out that it will be necessary for the District to consider adjusting current fee
schedules and implement additional revenue sources, such as supplemental user
fees similar to those previously adopted by Districts 1, 5, 6 and 13, in order to
maintain the District's financial integrity.
Following a general discussion and clarification of the cash flow projections,
the Director of Finance advised the Hoard members that he would provide then with
revised copies reflecting corrections to the statements.
Directing staff to study request Mr. Dawes reported on the request for
for annexation of Bolas Chico annexation of 1,520 acres of territory
area further (Annexation No. 19 - in the Bolas Chica area received from
Signal Bolsa Annexation) and Signal Bolas Corporation, the principal
report back at a future meeting landowner. The Bolas Chica area is
presently outside the boundary of
District No. 11 but is included within its sphere of influence and is totally
surrounded by the City of Huntington Beach. The District No. 11 Master Plan and
the Coast Trunk Sewer system were designed to provide sewerage service to the
Bolsa Chios area, based on the assumption that it would eventually annex to the
District.
Several issues were addressed in connection with the annexation request,
including the steps required to comply with the California Environmental Quality
Act relative to preparation of an Environmental Impact Report; funding—both
capital financing and operations and maintenance financing; determination of
necessary easements in order to construct the sewerage facilities needed to serve
..O
-3-
District ll
04/15/87
this territory; consent to the annexation by the other property owners; advance
funding by developer and construction scheduling; and the execution of an
agreement with the major landowner setting forth the terms and conditions of the
annexation, with regard to who will provide the local sewer system it was
pointed out that the local sewering agency for territory now within the
boundaries of District No. 11 is the City of Huntington Beach, but that a
determination was yet to be made because the landowners had sponsored a bill in
the State Legislature providng for the formation of the Bolsa-Bay Harbor and
Annexation District which, among other things, would be anpowered to provide
sewage collection and treatment services.
The Directors entered into a lengthy discussion relative to the issues involved
in connection with the proposed annexation. It was pointed out that resolution
of the issues previously discussed and the terms and conditions of an annexation
agreement with Signal Bolsa Corporation had not yet been worked out. The Chair
recognized Mr. Carl Neuhausen, representing Signal landmark, who stated that he
would like to review his ompany's proposed annexation agreement. The General
Counsel reported that Signal tadmxrk had presented a draft agreement but that it
was unacceptable in its present form. It was the consensus of the Board menbers
that discussion of the proposed agreement should be held in abeyance until the
District's General Counsel and staff had an opportunity to review the terns and
conditions with Signal Landmark and present an acceptable agreement to the Bawd
menbers for review and consideration.
The Chairman then observed that at the present time, based on the status of the
request received by the District, the Board of Directors have essentially the
following options:
- Approve the annexation request and adopt a resolution after public hearing
initiating the annexation procedures and authorizing the filing of an
application, in the name of the District, to IAFC for its conduct of
hearings.
- To deny the annexation request. This would be done based on findings by the
Board that it is not in the best interests of the District at this time.
- Take no formal action, but refer the matter to the General Counsel and staff
for further study and report back to the Board at a later date.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the request for annexation of 1,520 acres of territory in the Hoke Cnica
area (proposed Annexation No. 19 - Signal Bolas Annexation to Canty Sanitation
District No. 11) be referred back to the General Counsel and staff for further
study and discussions with representatives of the City of Huntington Beach,
Signal Bolsa Corporation and other property owners to address the issues that
need to be resolved and to attempt to work out terms and conditions of an
annexation agreement and report back to the Board.
The Chairman requested the General Counsel and staff to prepare a time schedule
for the annexation proceedings for consideration by the Board at a future
meeting.
-4-
District 11
04/15/87
Adiournnent Moved, seconded and duly carried:
`..1 That this meeting of the Board of Directors if County Sanitation District No. 11
be adjourned. The Chairman than declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:22 p.m.,
April 15, 1987.
Secretary, Board of i
County Sanitation District No. 11 of
orange County, California
.d
-5-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 .2 ,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Adjourned Regular Board
Meeting of District No. held on , 1987 was
duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the
District's offices on C1 , 1987 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this q 4&
day of 1987.
1987.
Rita J. Brown, Secretary of the
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. "
of Orange County, California