Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-03-11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92]28-812) 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714) 962-2411 March 4 , 1987 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11, 1987 - 7 : 30 P .M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7, 11 , 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. �etary Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 18th, at 5 :30 p.m. BUILDING COMMITTEE - Thursday, March 19th, at 5 : 30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 25th, at 5 : 30 p.m. DISTRICT 2 ADJOURNED MTG. - Thursday, March 26th, at 7 : 30 p.m. SELECT COMMITTEE TO - Tuesday, March 31st, at 5 : 30 p.m. ADVISE THE STAFF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFONNIA 109EC ELL AWME >O,WX 612) w MN VA Y.0 Mmmm( 91419622 11 L JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings March Mar 11, 1987 Mar 25, 1987 April Apr 08 , 1987 Apr 22 , 1987 May May 13 , 1987 May 27 , 1987 June Jun 10 , 1987 Jun 24 , 1987 July Jul 08 , 1987 Jul 22 , 1987 August Aug 12, 1987 None Scheduled September Sep 09 , 1987 Sep 23, 1987 October Oct 14, 1987 Oct 28, 1987 November Nov 12, 1987 (Tentative) None Scheduled (NOTE• This is a change from the regular meeting date of 11/11/87 which is Veteran' s Day) December Dec 09 , 1987 None Scheduled January Jan 13 , 1988 Jan 27, 1988 February Feb 10 , 1988 Feb 24, 1988 March Mar 09 , 1988 Mar 23 , 1988 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Pt Offim S. 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Talephom Am Cpaa 714 JOINT BOARDS 6 241 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MARCH 11, 1987 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and tiE1e above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 3/11/87 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - February 11, 1987 District 2 - February 11, 1987 District 3 - February 11, 1987 District 5 - February 11, 1987 District 6 - February 11, 1987 District 7 - February 11, 1987 District 11 - February 11, 1987 District 13 February 11, 1987 District 14 - February 11, 1987 (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" and "B" 2 04 87 2/18 87 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 319,767.89 $ 280,545.75 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,704,179 .37 106 ,486 .47 Joint Working Capital Fund - 69,780.18 199,832.83 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 4,954.44 13,859.28 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 8,280.00 -0- DISTRICT NO. 2 - 9,812.85 5,174.71 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 2,540.80 25 ,931.96 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 22,753.80 14 ,875.96 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 206.84 -0- DISTRICT NO. 7 - 92 ,171.20 7,934.40 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 3,587.41 8,075 .88 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - -0- -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 615�_ .31 2,482.09 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT 3,473 .72 -0- $2,248 ,045 .41 8 665,199.33 \� -2- 3/11/87 ( 9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(t) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by . a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and award purchase order contract for Purchase of Wood Shavings/Sawdust, Specification No. P-096, to Artesia Sawdust Products, Inc. for the price of $5 .25 per yard plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning March 15, 1987, with provision for a one-year extension (Estimated annual cost $78,750.00 plus sales tax) . See page "C" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and award contract for Purchase of Liquid Cationic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Flocculent (Polymer) , Specification No. P-097, to Allied Corporation, Engineered Materials Sector, for the price of $0 .049 per wet pound plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning April 13, 1987, with provision for four one-year extensions (Estimated annual cost $701,591.80 plus sales tax) . See peg- "D" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 87-18, approving plans and specifications for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is May 28, 1987) . See page "E" -3- 3/11/87 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2, authorizing an addition of $7,785 .65 to the contract with Riewit Pacific Co. for relocation of a transformer in Foster Power Building, purchase and installation of pull boxes to facilitate replacement of transformers in Power Building "A" and heat shrink tubing over bus connections at Foster Booster Pump Station; and granting a time extension of three (3) calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page F. (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Replacement of Centrifuges with Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-21, authorizing an addition of $8,423.00 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for additional concrete pile cap demolition work, altering the filter press drain lines and rerouting a water line, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "G" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Advanced Primary Treatment Chemical Addition Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-28 , and Advanced Primary Treatment Chemical Addition Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-36, authorizing an addition of $1,469.00 to the contract with Ziebarth and Alper for removal of undisclosed concrete and installation of temporary polymer system piping. See page "H" (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2 , Job No. P2-28-1, authorizing an addition of $12,001.00 to the contract with Ziebarth and Alper for modification of plant water piping serving the five new filter presses, purchase and installation of a base saddle support at Scrubber"L" , removal of undisclosed equipment, and rerouting lines not shown on the drawings. See page "I" (h) Consideration of motion approving Cha.:ga Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins A, B, C, H, I, J, R, L, M, N, 0, P and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R, authorizing an addition of $1,738.00 to the contract with Morley-Ziebarth and Alper, a Joint Venture, for costs to repair Basin L" scum trough pipe and for District-requested delays relative to sandblasting work. See page "J" -4- 3/11/87 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) W Consideration of motion authorzing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 5 to the Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Installation of Replacement of Centrifuges with Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-21; Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28-1; and Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling, Job No. P2-28-2, providing for preparation of an operations and maintenance manual and initial training for said facilities. ( j ) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No., P1-20, for additional design work to accommodate the proposed new plant entrance, new incoming trunk sewer serving Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 and addition of new headworks construction access roads. See page "K" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 87-19, approving Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, for additional design work to accommodate the proposed new plant entrance, new incoming trunk sewer serving Districts Nos. 6 , 7 and 14 and addition of new headworks construction access roads, on an hourly-rate basis plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit for a total amount not to exceed $53 ,060 .00, increasing the total maximum compensation from $2 ,439,455.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,492,515 .00. See page "L" (k) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers for design of Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31. See page "M.. ( 2 ) Consideration of Resolution No. 87-20, approving Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job b.,.� No. P1-31, on an hourly-rate basis plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $48,820.00 . See page "N.. -5- 3/11/87 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for consulting services for preparation of Operators' guides and training services for the odor control scrubber systems at Plant No. 1 and training on the odor control system for the new belt filter press installation at Plant No. 2. (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 87-21, approving plans and specifications for Removal of Grit it Plant No. 2, Specification No. M-029, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is April 28, 1987) . See page .0. DISTRICT 2 (n) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claims submitted by the attorney for Vinod S. Shah, (of S & B Plating in Brea) dated February 3 , 1987, and February 5 , 1987 , for an estimated amount in excess of $100,000 .00 for damages allegedly due to false arrest and malicious prosecution relative to civil and criminal complaints filed by the District for Industrial Waste Ordinance violations, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action. (o) Actions re Portion of the Euclid Interceptor Sewer between Lampson Avenue -and Orangewood Avenue in the City of Garden Grove: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff and General Counsel to negotiate an agreement with the City of Garden Grove relative to a cooperative project in connection with construction of Portion of the Euclid Interceptor Sewer between Lampson Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-1. (2) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement with Willdan Associates for the preparation of plans and specifications for construction of Portion of the Euclid Interceptor Sewer between Lampson Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-1. -6- 3/11/87 (9) DISTRICT 7 (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (p) (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7, authorizing a net deduction of $243 .65 from the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. , which includes eight items of additional miscellaneous work and grants a time extension of 102 calendar days for completion of said additional work; and assesses the contractor for liquidated damages in the amount of $10,500.00 for twenty-one (21) days between January 22, 1987 and February 12, 1987 at the rate of $500.00 per day, pursuant to the contract provisions-. See page P. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 87-22-7, accepting Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7 as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page �= (q) Consideration of motion to receive and file petition from Mr. 8 Mrs. Richard Obering requesting annexation of 1.13 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Vista Del Lego and La Cuesta Drive in unincorporated County territory; and consideration of Resolution No. 87-23-7, authorizing initiation of . proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation No. 122 - Obering Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. See pages 'R" and IS. (r) Consideration of motion to receive and file petition from Crawford Rills Development Company requesting annexation of 291.68 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "T" (s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim submitted by Christian Durand dated January 28, 1987, for a total amount of $1,219 .56 for alleged damages to his vehicle due to a raised manhole cover, and refer to the District's liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action. 4..r -7- 3/11/87 (9) DISTRICT 11 (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (t) Consideration of motion to receive and file petition from Signal Bolsa Corporation requesting annexation of 1,520 acres of territory to the District easterly of Pacific Coast Highway surrounded by the City of Huntington Beach, and refer to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 19 - Signal Bolas Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 11. See page "D" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any wr/ -8- (11) ALL DISTRICTS 3/11/87 Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for the six-month period ending December 31, 1986. (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) I.W1 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on February 25, 1987. (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the City of Fountain Valley dated February 6, 1987 re Districts' master-planned facilities' improvements and expansion at Reclamation Plant No. 1; and authorizing and directing the Joint Chairman to respond to said letter and meet with City officials, as recommended by the Executive Committee. (2) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the Joint Chairman to notify the Orange County Transportation Commission of the Districts' opposition to the proposed plan to form an Orange County Freeway Authority to establish a program to divert ad valorem taxes from other public agencies to finance improvements for Orange County' s freeway system, and urging the Commission to seek alternative funding sources. (13) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956 .9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on a.., of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary �y (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. -9- 3/11/87 (14) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (15) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) DISTRICT 1 Consid tion of motion to adjourn (17) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to Thursday, March 26 , 1987 at 7:30 p.m, to review proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers and the Draft Environmental Impact Report for said Amendment. (19) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 21) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23 ) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26 ) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- 3/11/87 (29) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 32) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn -11- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellie Avenue County Sanitation Districts Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 of Orange County, California Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARD Meeting Date March 11, 1987 - 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager's Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer's estimate. Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award. ALL DISTRICTS No. 9(a): Award of Purchase of Wood Shavings/Sawdust, Specification No. P-096. The Districts use a combination of wood shavings/sawdust at both plants to mix with dewatered activated sludge to reduce the moisture content to comply with the Regional Water Quality Control Board's Coyote Canyon landfill disposal requirements. The Districts dispose of up to 140,000 cubic yards of sludge annually at the County's landfill , and the Regional Board requires an average solids content of 220 (771% moisture content). We are presently in the process of installing additional belt filter presses that, once installed, will reduce, but not eliminate, the need for the use of this material . The sawdust is also used to cover digester sludge drying beds if odor becomes a problem and to mix with oil being extracted from sewer siphons for absorption and moisture content reduction prior to disposal . Two bids were received for furnishing and delivering a combination of wood shavings and sawdust to the two treatment plants. The bids ranged from a high of $5.50 per cubic yard to a low of $5.25 per cubic yard. The staff recommends the bid be awarded to Artesia Sawdust, the low bidder, in the amount of $5.25 per cubic yard. Based on an estimated maximum usage of 15,000 cubic yards per year, the estimated annual amount would be $78,750.00 plus applicable sales tax, for a one-year period commencing March 15, 1987. Included in the specifications is an option for an extension agreement for up to one year under mutually agreeable terms. -1- March 11, 1987 No. 9(b): Award of Purchase of Liquid Cationic Pol electrolyte Chemical Flocculent (Polymer , pecification No. P-097. The Districts use a polyelectrolyte chemical flocculent (polymer) to aid in the treatment and dewatering of sludge. The current contract for supplying this material is expiring and bids for a new contract have been solicited. In January, the staff conducted performance trials on the various polymers under our specific operating conditions to establish quantities of each polymer required and enable an evaluation of the bids to determine the overall lowest cost based on performance of the material . Because performance of the various polymers differs, unit price alone does not necessarily determine the lowest and best bid. The volume of the polymer required to meet the performance standard must also be taken into consideration. Based on the tests, seven vendors were pre-qualified for bidding. Four bids were received on February 17, 1987. Based on an estimated one year polymer requirement, Allied Corporation is the overall low bidder supplying an estimated 13,318,200 wet pounds of polymer at a total estimated cost of $701,591.80 plus sales tax. The bids ranged to a high of $1,810,185.00. The staff recommends a contract be awarded to Allied Corporation, Engineered Materials Sector, the overall low bidder, for the unit price of $0.049 per wet pound plus applicable sales tax, for a one year period commencing April 13, 1987 at an estimated first year contract cost of $701,591.80 plus sales tax. The proposed contract contains an option to renew for up to four one year periods under mutually agreeable terms. The annual cost will increase as our sludge production continues to rise. No. 9(c): A roval of Plans and S ecifications for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at P ant No. , o No. J- 5. To date, four contracts have been awarded to expedite the construction of the master planned new Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2: The Surge Tower Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15-1; Prepurchase of Pumps and Variable Frequency Drives for Outfall Booster Station "C", Job No. J-15A; Purchase and Installation of an Ultrasonic Flowmeter for Ocean Outfall at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15B-1; and Vaults for Ultrasonic Flowmeter for Ocean Outfall , Job No. J-15B-2. The consulting design engineer, John Carollo Engineers, has now completed plans and specifications for construction of the pump station itself, Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15. The new booster station will include five pumps, each capable of delivering 120 MGD to the outfall . The capacity of the station will be 480 MGD with four pumps operating (the fifth pump is standby) . This contract also includes tunnels, outfall piping, new emergency overflow structures at the Santa Ana River, demolition of the existing Rothrock Outfall Booster Pump Station "A" and renovation of existing digester cleaning beds. Construction of the station is scheduled for completion in the fall of 1989. Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Job No. J-15. A tentative bid date of May 28, 1987 is scheduled. The engineer's estimate for this work is $28 million. -2- ' - March 11, 1987 No. 9(d): A royal of Chan a Order No. 6 to the Electrical Reliability Facilities at ant No. 2> Job No. - Change Order No. 6 adds $7,785.65 and three calendar days to the �./ contract for the master planned improvements to the electrical distribution system at Plant No. 2. This change order includes labor and materials to relocate a transformer in the Foster Booster Power Building for the amount of $4,015.80; providing and installing wire pull boxes to facilitate replacement of two transformers in Power Building "A" for the amount of $2,367.85; and installation of heat shrink tubing over exposed copper bus connections at Foster Booster Pump Station to add atmospheric protection for $1,402.00. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 adding $7,785.65 and three calendar days to the contract with Kiewit Paciic Company. No. 9(e): Approval of Chan a Order No. 5 for Installation of Replacement of Cen r uges w t Bet Filter Presses at Plant No. 1. Jobo. PI-21. Change Order No. 5 adds $8,423.00 and thirty calendar days to the contract for replacement of five worn out centrifuges with four new belt filter presses at Plant No. 1. The belt presses are more efficient in dewatering the solids. The major item under this change order, in the amount of $7,166.00, is additional demolition work required on underground concrete pile caps to facilitate the drain system; and modifications to the drain line system for the filter presses. This additional work was necessary because the existing pile caps were not oriented as shown on the old "as built" drawings. The other item was to reroute an existing underground city water line to keep the valves and lines serviceable, and to protect the line during construction due to its shallow depth. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 adding $8,423.00 and thirty calendar days to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. No. 9(f): A royal of Chan a Order No. 1 for Advanced Primar Treatment Chemica it on aci sties at ant No. o No. P - an Advanced Primary Treatment Chemical on aci sties at ant No. o No. P2-36. Change Order No. 1 adds $1,469.00 to the contract for the Advanced Primary Treatment Chemical Addition Facilities at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job Nos. P1-28 and P2-36. This project will enhance our treatment processes and improve our ability to meet the NPDES Permit requirements. Polymer is added to the primary settling basins which increases their efficiency. Items covered by this change order include removal of undisclosed underground concrete in the path of the new chemical drain line and temporary piping of the polymer system at Plant No. 2. The temporary polymer piping was necessary to aid the treatment of higher flows when Irvine Ranch Water District began discharging to District No. 14 concurrent with construction activities on other sedimentation basins which required removing them from service. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $1,469.00 to the contract with Ziebarth and Alper. There is no time extension associated with this change order. � -3- March 11, 1987 ` No. 9(g): Approval of Change Order No. 9 for the Installation of Replacement Belt filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28- . Change Order No. 9 adds $12,001.00 to the contract for the replacement of three obsolete and worn out sludge dewatering centrifuges with five newer, more efficient belt filter presses at Plant No. 2. Included in this change order is modification of the plant water piping which serves the five filter presses to conform to changed criteria for the amount of $8,131.00. The pipes were originally placed to serve the old centrifuges; however, larger pipe sizes are needed to accommodate the new belt presses and match the system on the existing ten belt presses. Also included was a base saddle support for the 54-inch fiberglass duct at Scrubber "L" for the amount of $1,945.00 to avoid interference with existing carbon filter tanks; and removal of undisclosed pipe, fittings, tank and rerouting of PVC, water, and polymer lines to accommodate new sludge piping for the amount of $1,925.00. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 9 adding $12,001.00 to the contract with Ziebarth and Alper. There is no time extension associated with this change order. No. 9(h): A royal of Chan a Order No. 4 to the Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimenta ion asins B H , K L M N P an 0 at an No. 2, Jo No. P2-3 R. Change Order No. 4 adds $1,738.00 to the contract for rehabilitation of thirteen (13) primary sedimentation basins at Plant No. 2. This is the last of several primary basin rehabilitation projects required prior to the planned installation of covers for odor control at Plant No. 2. The change order includes the repair of a broken scum trough pipe in Basin "L" which was found during excavation for the amount of $998.00. The other item consists of costs of $740.00 for delays to the contractor's sandblasting operations. The Districts' staff requested the temporary work stoppage until winds subsided due to excessive dust entering Headworks "C" caused by the winds. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 adding $1,738.00 to the contract with Morley-Ziebarth and Alper, a Joint Venture. There is no time extension associated with this change order. No. 90 ): Author! the Selection Committee to Negotiate Addendum No. 5 to the En ineerin Services Agreement or Insta atlon OF a acemen o entrifu es with Belt i ter Presses at Plant No. 1, Jo .No nsta ation of Re acement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P - , an Vents an on Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling, Job No. P2-28- . John Carollo Engineers is under contract to design and provide construction services for the installation of replacement belt filter presses at the two treatment plants, as well as ventilation improvements at Plant No. 2. The ventilation improvements at Plant No. 2, have been finished. Construction of the two belt filter press installations is near completion. Operation and maintenance manuals were not included in the consulting engineer' s original scope of work, and it is now appropriate to begin their preparation and to also provide for initial staff training on the new dewatering q_ Nl� March 11, 1987 system. Several elements of�the new system have been significantly modified at both plants including the conveyor belts, a new foul air system and the polymer �./ system. In addition, the sludge feed system at Plant No. 1 is changing from a gravity feed to a pump system. Lastly, the Engineer will prepare Standard Operating Procedures (SDP's) for the facilities. The staff is, therefore, recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate an addendum for the additional engineering services for preparation of operations and maintenance manuals and training for these three projects. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Boards for consideration. No. 90): Approval of Selection Committee Certification for Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering ervices Agreement for Design of Headwor s No. T at Plant No. 1, JODNO. In February, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Headworks No. 2 at Treatment Plant No. 1. The Joint Districts currently have under design a new Plant No. 1 main entrance opposite the San Diego Freeway southbound on/off ramp at Euclid Street and Ellis Avenue. Also under preparation by Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 is a project report detailing the sizing, routing and other engineering and construction data for the proposed new sewer that will convey their future wastewater flows to Plant No. 1. The new incoming trunk sewer will connect to the Joint Treatment Works at the Diversion Structure at Plant No. 1. All of these facilities are in the northeast corner of the plant. r./ Also under design, and to be constructed in the same vicinity, is the new $32 million Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1. Design of this project is nearing completion and it will soon be bid and awarded. From our planning efforts to coordinate the multiple and concurrent construction projects, it has been determined that to avoid future construction disruption to the new entry, the necessary modifications to the Diversion Structure and the installation of the connecting portion of the new Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 trunk sewer should be included in the new headworks project. Further, it is proposed to route construction traffic to this major project through the back entrance at the southeasterly corner of the plant off Garfield Street, along the easterly plant perimeter adjacent to the Santa Ana River levee to the headworks construction site. This construction access road will connect to our interior circulation roads in accordance with the Master Plan of Support Facilities. This will minimize the traffic impact on crowded Ellis Avenue. This road work should also be added to the headworks project. The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee with John Carollo Engineers to include this additional work based on hourly rates plus overhead at 143%, direct expenses and fixed profit in an amount not to er,:e_d $53,060.00. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the agreement with John Carollo Engineers to provide the additional design services. Copies of the �./ certification and resolution are attached with the supporting documents. -5- 4 March 11, 1987 No. (9)k: Approval of Selection Committee Certification of En ineerin Services Agreement or reparation o Pans an pecifications or emo ition of Digesters -and elm at cemenr of flo ei ripin eano� ul�F__ rading and Paving at Plant No. ob No. PI-31. ` J In February, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit v proposals and negotiate an engineering agreement for the design of several miscellaneous items of work at Treatment Plant No. 1 to accommodate the on-going master planned construction program. The work includes replacement of a worn out boiler; addition of sludge piping cleanouts at Basins 3, 4 and 5; miscellaneous grading and paving improvements and the demolition of three digesters that have exceeded their useful life. The new Central Power Generating Station, including space to accommodate a new control center, will be built on the present site of these digesters. Proposals were solicited from three firms, all of which responded. The Selection Committee has negotiated an agreement with John Carollo Engineers who submitted the most cost effective proposal , based on hourly rates plus overhead at 143%, direct expenses and fixed profit for a total maximum amount not to exceed $48,820.00. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving an agreement with John Carollo Engineers to provide the necessary design services. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting documents. No. 90 ): Author�izin the Selection Committee to Negotiate an Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie. for Pre ara ion o oc et- ze era ors' rainin Manua s an t er Iraining Aids Tor all Scr=er Systems at Plant No. I an Dewatering Building scrubbers at Plant No. 2. As part of the Boards' overall program of mitigating odors, in February 1985, the Directors approved an agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., for odor control scrubber system optimization, preparation of operating guides, training services for the scrubber systems and digester cleaning bed odor assessment all at Plant No. 2. The scrubbers included were H & I, "C" Headworks, Dissolved Air Flotation and Sludge Storage Building. In addition to the detailed operating guides (which are pocket-sized so each operator can carry it at all times), the training also involved presentation of video-taped training sessions and hands-on inspection of the scrubber systems. The effort has been successful and the odor complaints at Plant No. 2 have been significantly reduced. In order to provide for similar training on Plant No. 1 facilities, as well as on the new Plant No. 2 dewatering scrubbers, the staff is recommending that the Selection Committee negotiate an agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., to provide for preparation of the detailed operators' guides and training for the Plant No. 1 air scrubber systems. The agreement would also provide for training on the new Plant No. 2 sludge dewatering scrubbers. The Districts are now finalizing construction of additional odor control facilities at the belt press buildings at both plants. At Treatment Plant No. 2, three new and three modified scrubbers which will serve the sludge dewatering (belt press) operation will soon be on line, with the three new scrubbers serving the Plant No. 1 dewatering facilities to follow. In the next few -6- March 11, 1987 months, construction is expected to start on Headworks No. 2, at Plant No. 1 which will also include additional odor control scrubbers. In addition, as the odor control projects have progressed at both plants, new operation requirements from the South Coast Air Quality Management District for monitoring and operation are being imposed. Accordingly, staff recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate an agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., for the above services. Following the Committee's negotiations, the agreement will be presented to the Boards for consideration. No. 9(m): A royal of Plans and Specifications for Removal of Grit at Plant No. 2, peci ication No. M- e In years past it was common practice to bury grit and screenings removed from the wastewater stream at the plant sites. Currently production of grit and screenings are transported to a landfill in sealed containers for disposal . Buried grit and screenings at Plant No. 1 were removed in 1985 and 1986 under an existing contract with BKK Corporation to haul both grit and sludge from Plant Nos. 1 and 2 to their landfill in West Covina. We have now determined that approximately 65,000 cubic yards need to be removed from Plant No. 2. The Districts have obtained a permit from the South Coast Air Quality Management District to remove the material which specifies the amount of surrounding dirt which must also be removed. Removal of the grit and screenings will eliminate a potential noxious odor source and allow the area to be graded for drainage and other uses during the upcoming master planned construction of the new Booster Station. The engineering staff has prepared the plans and specifications for Removal of Grit at Plant No. 2, Specification No. M-029. v, Separate bidding for removal of the buried grit and screenings is now recommended since current production of sludge, including grit and screenings, has increased dramatically, due to higher flows and the resulting higher treatment requirements. Additionally, removal under the existing contract with BKK Corporation would take two years: Because of the volume it is advantageous to expedite the work so that the site can be used sooner, as a staging area for other contracts, as well as a disposal area for excavated material from the new Outfall Booster Station construction. Staff recommends approval' of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Specification No. M-029. A tentative bid date of April 28, 1987 is scheduled. The engineer' s estimate for this work is $1,600,000.00. Once bids are received, a recommendation will be made to the Boards for award of a contract. DISTRICT NO. 2 No. 9(n): Receive, File and Deny Claims Submitted by the Attorney for Vinod S. Shah. The District has received claims from the attorney for Vinod S. Shah dated February 3, 1987 and February 5, 1987, for personal damages. The claims allege false arrest and malicious prosecution due to the arrest and criminal complaint filed against him by the District and the Orange County District Attorney on October 28, and further claim that Mr. Shah has been subsequently harassed at his place of employment. The Directors will recall that the District and the Orange County District Attorney have filed both civil and criminal charges against Mr. Shah and his firm S & B Plating, located in Brea, for repeated violations of the District' s Industrial Waste Ordinance. The amount of the claim is not fixed but the claimant's attorney estimates it to be in excess of $100,000.00. -7- March 11, 1987 The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny the claim and refer it to the Districts' liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action. No. 9(o): Coo erative Project with Cit of Garden Grove for a Portion of the Euclid In for ewer, Between Lam son Avenue and Orangewood venue, Contract No. Z-Zb-i. (1) Cooperative Project with the City of Garden Grove. The Directors will recall that in November 1986, a draft of proposed County Sanitation District No. 2, Amendment No. 1 to the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for County Sanitation Districts No. 2, 3 and 11 was received. An Environmental Impact Report is now under preparation for that Master Plan Amendment. The proposed amendment includes a recommendation for the construction of an interceptor sewer in Euclid Avenue to serve portions of the drainage areas within the cities of Anaheim, Brea, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana, Villa Park, Yorba Linda and Fountain Valley. Within the City of Garden Grove, there were several alternate alignments included. Staff has recently met with officials from the City of Garden Grove to discuss construction of a portion of the proposed master planned Euclid Interceptor Sewer within that City. In our meetings it has been learned that the City is planning several projects which could effect future District projects. The first is the installation of a storm drain between Lampson Avenue and Chapman Avenue, scheduled for the spring of 1987. Following will be redevelopment projects within the central portions of the City. In all , there are several opportunities for cooperative projects between the City of Garden Grove and Sanitation District No. 2. Staff is continuing to hold meetings with the City to determine how each agency could benefit and the public inconvenience `/ be minimized through combined projects. One project appears certain, and that is a cooperative effort with the City of Garden Grove relative to the installation of a portion of the Euclid Interceptor Sewer with the storm drain project. The City of Garden Grove has indicated they can delay the installation of the storm drain for a short period to allow the District time to prepare construction plans for the sewer. Accordingly, staff is requesting authority for staff and the General Counsel to negotiate an agreement with the City of Garden Grove pertaining to the cooperative project described above. (2) Authorizing Negotiations with Engineer for Design. The second action requested is that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate with Willdan Associates for design of the trunk sewer, incorporating the City storm drain plan, between Lampson Avenue and the terminus of Contract No. 2-26 just north of Orangewood Avenue in the City of Anaheim. The staff is recommending that the Committee be authorized to negotiate with Willdan Associates because of their familiarity with the system frwa preparation of the Master Plan Amendment which identified the deficiency. Because of that, Willdan appears in the best position to be able to prepare the plans and specifications within the time constraints of the City. Staff recommends approval of the above items. -8- March 11, 1987 DISTRICT NO. 7 �./ No. 9(p): A roval of Chan a Order No. 5 for Main Street Pun Station Contract No. 7- ; an ccep ance o on rac as omp a e. (1) Change Order No. 5 Change Order No. 5 is a net deduction of $243.65 from the contract for the Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7. This project was designed to accommodate the increased flows from the Irvine Business Complex in District No. 7 and all the flows from new District No. 14. The change order consists of eight items of additional work totaling S10,256.35, a contract time extension, and a deduction for late completion of $10,500.00 for a net deduct of S243.65. The additional work includes repair of a PVC lining in the incoming 66-inch sewer, miscellaneous piping and electrical changes, modifications to a catwalk, modifications to the hydropneumatic tank system, and minor miscellaneous site work. A contract time extension of 102 calendar days for the additional work and alteration of the construction sequence is included in this change order. The final item is a credit for $10,500.00, which represents assessment of $500.00 per day liquidated damages for a period of twenty-one calendar days for late completion of the contract, (originally specified to be complete by October 2, 1986 and subsequently, extended to January 22, 1987). Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 deducting $243.65 from the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. (2) Acceptance of Job as Complete Advanco Constructors, Inc., has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Staff, therefore, recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final closeout agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $3,058,814.53. No. 9(q): Receive File and Initiate Proceedin s for Annexation No. 122, Obering Annexation to ounty an tatmon O stn ct Na. The District has received a request from Mr. and Mrs. Richard Obering to annex 1.13 acres of territory in the vicinity of La Cuesta Drive and Vista Del Lago in unincorporated County territory. There is a residence currently on the acreage. The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 Tax Exchanges for annexing properties. The property has serious septage problems and, therefore, staff recommends that the Board receive and file the request for Annexation No. 122, and that the resolution attached to the agenda material authorizing immediate initiation of proceedings be adopted. -9- March 11, 1987 ' No. 9(r): Receive and File Annexation No. 125, Tract No. 9608 to District No. 2. The District has received a request from Crawford Hills Development Company to annex 291.68 acres of uninhabited territory north of the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road within the City of Orange. The local sewering agency is the City of Orange. The owner of the property is Crawford Hills Development Company. Staff recommends that the Board receive and file the request for Annexation No. 125 and refer it to staff for study and recommendation. No. 9(s): Receive, File and Deny Claim Submitted by Christian Durand. The District has received a claim from Christian Durand dated January 28, 1987, for damages to his vehicle and time off work allegedly due to a raised manhole cover. The total amount of the claim is $1,219.56. The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny the claim and refer it to the District's liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action. DISTRICT NO. 11 No. 9(t): Receive and File Request to Annex Bolsa Chica to District No. 11, Annexation No. IT. The District has received a request from Signal Bolsa Corporation to annex approximately 1,520 acres of the Bolsa Chica area to District No. 11. The property has several owners including Signal , Oceanview School District, W. R. Grace Properties, Inc., Metropolitan Water District, Donald E. Goodell , and the State of California. The proponents are proposing an agreement setting forth terms and conditions of the annexation. No local sewering agency exists at the present time, however, formation of a new agency to provide that service and others is also under study by the proponents. Following an evaluation of the annexation proposal , it is the staff's intent to recommend that the Board have an adjourned meeting in April to review the proposed annexation. At the same meeting the staff would also update the Board on the District's Master Plan of Sewer Facilities. Staff recommends that the Board receive and file the request for Annexation No. 19 and refer it to staff for study and report back. No. 11: Financial Report for Six Month Period Ending December 31, 1986. Enclosed are the Budgetary Financial Statements for the first six months of the fiscal year. If any Director has questions about the statements, please call Bill Butler, Director of Finance, at 962-2411. No. 12: Report and Recommendation of the Executive Committee. The Committee met on February 25th and enclosed for Board members is a written report of their discussions and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards. v -10- r � RE; AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA IOW MIS AV E PO BOX 0127 February 23, 1987 ro WMNVA ..c FOMA92)2"12) 0101BBQRAfl Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California Subject: Summary Financial Report for Six Months Ended December 31, 1986 Transmitted herewith is the Summary Financial Report for six months ended December 31, 1986. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts for the second quarter of 1986-87 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1986-87 budget for all Districts is $412.0 million, of which approximately 84% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions, including reserves for said capital projects. The total budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are set forth below. al, TVE zI - S@E41IK OVILIONS cF COiIARB) IIXSE 1986-87 1aDunmem 1986-87* 1985-86* WSME%= 8 CF BUD= JOINT TRFATMEW WIRS 0 6 M $ 30.5 $ 26.8 $ 3.7 7.4% COELBC=CN S29M & OffiR DISIR=O 4 M 4.1 3.6 0.5 1.0 TRP 24M FLAW 0ONSIIUQTQ] APPFCPI IATICNS 50.1 31.1 19.0 12.2 DLMUCT SEWER ATM APPRIFRT =cNs 80.5 66.0 14.5 19.5 DEBT SMMCE 12.3 1.8 10.5 3.0 SIB-TOIAI. $177.5 $129.3 $ 48.2 43.1% ONSTIMMW RESERVES $201.0 T 85.0 1 6.0 48.8 OTOM RESERVES 33.5 35.9 (2.4) 8.1 SUSITO AL $234.5 $120.9 $113.6 56.9% TORT. R@21ne= $412.0 $250.2 $161.8 100.0% E@D1NG cum-am $ 32.4 $ 27.2 $ 5.2 7.9% APPADPt¢AM RESEFNES 180.2 154.4 25.8 43.7 SUB-IOAL $212.6 $181.6 731 51.6% TAX ATdQY CN (18 SEAM $ 24.7 $ 21.7 $ 3.0 6.0 TAX = EM BOD IMM70 0.7 0.1 0.6 0.2 CRASTRUMOd GRANTS - 2.4 6.3 (3.9) 0.6 I= 22.8 18.6 4.2 5.5 DaERESf 6 aim 148.8 21.9 126.9 36.1 SIB-TOM $199.4 $ 68.6 $130.8 48.4% TCAL FUD= $412.0 $250.2 $161.8 100.D8 * ADJUSTED ECR R4TERR-0ISWCr TFUNNSACIU S Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects , and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter-fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash transactions for fiscal 1986-87 which were accrued in 1985-86 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest generated by our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) is $11.2 million through the second quarter of the year. Virtually 100% of our funds are invested in short-term government securities or time deposits. We presently have our funds invested with the County Treasurer's commingled investment program to take advantage of the higher yields available. JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. The JO expenditures along with the self-funded insurance program costs are monitored by the Fiscal Policy Committee and if the staff experiences some unexpected expenditures, they are reviewed by the Committee. Salaries and Wages - Even though we have had to add employees, there are several authorized but unfilled positions and, thus, considerable payroll savings have been realized to date. Employees' Benefits - Includes Retirement, Workers.' Compensation, Unemployment Insurance, Group Medical Insurance and Uniforms. Unemployment insurance and other benefit accounts will continue to recognize considerable savings because of unfilled positions mentioned above under Salaries and Wages. Chargebacks to Districts and CORF - Payroll expenses are charged back to CORP through the cost accounting system for work on the treatment plants' capital expansion program, and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital expansion projects as well as maintenance and repair of said systems. Also reflects industrial waste division charges to respective Districts. Gasoline, Oil 6 Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool. A large portion is recovered through our equipment billing system and included in revenue below. Insurance - Annual premiums are expensed at time of payment, which is generally during the first qu-rtrr of the fiscal year. Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity, boiler,. fire, earthquake and all risk insurance policies, and pro-rata coat of the self-funded Liability insurance program. -2- Memberships - Includes the cost of membership in CASA, AMSA, SARFPA and other organizations. Office Expense - This account includes various types of office supplies, stationery and related items. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for influent and sludge odor control at treatment plant sites. The main chemicals used to control odors are chlorine and hydrogen peroxide. Ferric chloride is used as a supplemental odor control chemical, and caustic soda is also used in air scrubbers throughout the plants to reduce hydrogen sulfide emissions. The $8,400 per day expenditure peaks during the summer months and is lower through the fall and winter. Chemical Coagulants - Expenditures for this item are required to dewater our sludges prior to disposal to comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleanera, janitorial, tools, lab chemicals, etc. purchased throughout the year. Contractual Services - The major elements in this line item are for payment of gate fees at the Coyote Canyon landfill, and payment for grit and waste-activated sludge removal and disposal at the BEE landfill. Professional Services - Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. Printing and Publications - Includes all reproduction activities in-house and with outside services. Rents and Leases - Equipment Outside Equipment Rental - Primarily for the rental of large cranes and equipment necessary for removing and replacing major pumps, engines and other large equipment during the course of maintenance and repair operations. CSDOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for District-owned equipment used for overhead type activities. There is an offsetting credit applied through the allocation system for these charges. Repairs and Maintenance - This item includes parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this item. Generally this account runs close to budget each year due to the unpredictability of major equipment failures. Research and Monitoring - Budget includes funds for the ocean monitoring contract required by our NPDES permit. Other projects include operational research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating pa-a-stirs, and also include the Districts' annual share of participation in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. -3- Travel, Meetings a Training - Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required additional staff and Board travel. .� Utilities - The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power. Other Expenses - For items not chargeable elsewhere. Prior Year's Expense - This account is required by the Uniform Accounting System and represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year. Allocation to Districts and CORF - This is an account established in connection with the cost accounting system and represents materials, supplies, and services overhead chargebacks to the individual Districts and CORP. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FOND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 61.0% (including reserves) of each District's budget requirements for 1986-87. During the first six months, $17.5 million was expended an joint works treat- ment and disposal facilities improvement and expansion projects. The pro-rata share of joint works improvement and expansion costs is reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS - The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the eight Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts: Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation of the Districts' pro rate share of the maximum 1% basic property tax allowed under Proposition 13. The Districts average approximately 2.3% ($.023 for each $1.00) of the basic levy. Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make voter- approved outstanding general obligation bond principal and interest payments. In accordance with the Jarvis-Gann initiative, tax levies to satisfy these obligations are not restricted. The 1986-87 levy was waived for Districts 2, and 7, and debt service is being financed by a transfer from other District funds. Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB have historically funded up to 87k% of treatment plant construction for approved projects. Estimates reflect anticipated payments based on receipt of our new NPDES permit and grant funding of eligible projects at 80% (net) of project cost, except for the $5.5 million hydraulic reliability project at Plant No. 2 (Project No. P2-25-2) , for which we expect to receive only 30% grant financing. -4- Fees - All Districts now have an adopted sewer connection fee schedule. This account also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by seven of the nine Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and the user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 5, 6 and 13. Annexation fee revenue is undeterminable and, thus, is not included in the estimates unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of fees. Sale of Capacity Rights - This account records income from sale of capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA and IRWD, including the capital replacement charge. Joint Works Equity Sale - Revenue from the annual joint facilities inter- district equity adjustment required by the recalculation of the respective ownership percentages. Cost of this adjustment for purchasing Districts is included in each District's Share of Joint Works Construction. Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents each District's share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) . Bond Retirement and Interest Expense - Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds and certificates of participation of the respective Districts. Annual expense for all Districts is approximately $12.3 million. Share of Joint Operating - Represents each District's share of operating and maintaining the jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details) . District Operating and Other Expenditures - Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating expenses, industrial monitoring, operations, maintenance and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. -5- omm glamm*+ DIS11IIC6 CF CRUZ OORII4 salwar mm �Cl2A L Mm BODI£P imam 86 APPBOM) BODmr YPJVM-M= Q&7UIENM ]� 1986-87 H� BID 8ID0?FSIIgD 8Ai1frUES, pAQS & BREFT1S Sal, ies &Wajes 12,415,000 5,449,949 6,965,051 43.90 Payroll Benefits 3,411,000 1,331,902 2,079,098 39.05 T3ML FAIM3L 15,826,000 6,781,851 9,044,149 42.85 Less: Clwgerots to DIS7S & OOPF (3,339,000) (1,472,400) (1,866,600) 44.10 Mar jaw OPENUING PAZaL 12,497,000 5,309,451 7,177,549 42.52 1?,'m16, SOPPLIM & SBPF m Gasoline, Oil & Diesel 265,000 77,446 187,554 29.22 Lnisase 576,000 520,672 55,328 90.39 potmryyips 20,000 270 19,730 1.35 Office Mcpanse 115,000 46,856 68,144 40.74 cUorine & Cdx control 2,374,000 868,990 1,505,010 36.60 ammical Onagawts 1,768,000 636,475 1,131,525 36.00 OOthewr m 25 Opriatinjg Supplzes 495 000 340,857 154,142 53.74 tcachsl 2,495,000 1,340,858 1,154,192 53.74 Pmfessicnal Services 399,000 114,135 284,865 28.61 Pr inting & Publication 138,000 63,454 74,546 45.98 1 16ita1 145,000 61,801 83,199 42.62 & 2,136 000 1,192,611 943,389 55.83 imeach & Mnitoring 1,697,000 644,917 1,052,083 38.00 7tinig 65;� 21 4 ,3� le E1882 5.90 Utilities 6,230000 2,371,209 3,858,791 38.06 Ot1,er Expenses130:000 66,208 63,792 50.93 Pricr Years Expanses 50,000 9,952 40,048 19.90 operating Expenses 10,000 8,766 1,234 87.66 \-I�DL wommSS & smVICES 19,191,000 8,232,181 10,958,619 42.90 Less: ALLO7+IT' CN 1D DIS19 & CEFF (233,000) (64,839) (168,161) 27.83 NET J= OPER MATMUM & SFR7IC S 18,958,000 8,167,342 10,790,658 43.08 TOML JOINT CPEw=EXIENSE9 31,445,000 13,476,793 17,968,207 42.86 BEOFNOFS [Rvemrs (9001000) (530,231) (369,769) 58.91 less: Allcuation to DISLS & aORF 2,000 6,872 (4,872) 343.60 lEr Jow CPERAM1G luim S (898,000) (523,359) (374,641) 58.28 1Er JC@S OPEPATING EXIMEE4 30,547,000 12,953,434 17,593,566 42.40 N.G. FUN CHAIM CIS!= 1 9,676 4,771 3,220,000 1,380,937 2 28,867 14,556 9,604,000 4,212,987 3 30,511 14,323 10,151,000 4,145,638 5 4,669 2,450 1,555,000 709,186 6 4,897 2,249 1,631,000 650,871 7 5,603 2,950 1863,000 853785 11 6,716 3,416 2:236,1000 988:820 13 105 39 34,ODO 11,211 14 760 0 253,000 0 91,804 44,754 30,547,000 12,953,435 COMM ShNnm N OQ9mcr No. 1 SQ4!fli 6 H RFD 12/31i. 8�S .. BDOfEC AG R8VM 1986-87 Raskinirg 7sar-m -Date RxIget Year-To-Date et B Dpwx ed Beginning fled Balances, July 1 28,037,521 Rff,m - Tex levy (Bond Ptad(s) only) 79,212 38634 40,578 48.77 Tax AlloCatione/ShventiQlg (Stare of 1%) 1,503,000 687:940 815r060 45.77 Fa3eral and State Construction Grants 251r000 0 2511000 .00 Crnction Fees 232,000 13,864 218,136 5.98 Other Fees 1,591,000 480,861 1,110,139 30.22 Sale of Olacity Rights 448,000 22,157 425,843 4.95 hReresst 6 Nfsc. Receipts 1,103,DD0 993,921 1091079 90.11 Oher 375,000 0 375,000 .00 Taal I%ae 5,582,212 2,237,377 31344,835 40.08 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 30,274,898 IDS• Stye of Joint Worms Tout. Plant a Raserves 14594,000 1,859,129 12,734,971 12.74 District Tfu* Saes Ciatr a Nerves 9:358000 79,561 9,278,439 .85 Bond retirement atd Interest Hgense 1,740,125 72,771 1,667,354 4.18 Stare of Joint Worms Cperating flgxmm 3,220,000 1,380,937 1,839,063 42.89 Prodded for Reiatassement Agreements 0 0 0 .00 District Operating 6 Other Rtnpenditnses 223,000 123,667 99,333 55.46 Total Expenditures 29,135,125 3,516,065 25,619,060 12.07 Ending fled Manes 26,758,833 FACQ.TTIFi EnWSIM Balance Adj•t^'--'- Transfer To Ba)anoe 7-17-1 86 S Additions Fixed Assets 32 6 CO'SIIO = IN PR33E S: 1-15R iarhabilitation of Nantcles 421 421. Ing-t= Finan :irg Plan 304 79,140 79,444 Sub-Total 304 79,561 79,865 Share of Joint Woks 2,908,195 1,859,129 (9,065) 4,758,259 CtP mutegration Adjtatment Sud�Total 2,908,195 1,859,129 (9,065) 4,758,259 CMUMD PRCIMSY, Pf747f 6 $DIP: and Property 82,595 Cv� pllection Tares and Rap Sons 51996:961 5,596,961 Moeatnent 0 Disposal Facilities 32,593 ll,593 General Plant and Pdmin Frail 35,256 35,256 FF�iity in Joint 1Yeao�t Fail 23,751,174 (18,078) 9,065 23,742,161 Other Assets at Cat Less A=t. 18,8ffi (3,237) 0 15,645 Taal Property Plant 6 B3uip 32,404,960 1,917,375 0 39,322,335 a3W7 SAMER 0:4 DISJM= NO. 2 ARM P7 [�OiS FEMN 1986-87 DzIget iaayear�mmee Fe nae Begiming Fad Balances, July 1 163,080,926 RLVENDES• Tax Imy 07o<d Fnd(s) only) 0 0 0 .00 Tax Allacatio e/Si:centio s (Sure of 1%) 6,749,000 3,251,731 3,497,269 48.18 Federal and State Raetructicn Grants 610,000 0 670,000 .00 Qaaecticn Fps 850,000 433,347 416,653 50.98 Other Elam 4,030,000 (267,897) 4,297,897 (6.65) Sale of Capacity Rights 1,196,000 185745 1,010,255 15.53 sc Interest fi Mt . Receipts 6,224,000 3,913:149 2,310,851 62.97 Otter 800,000 0 800,000 .00 Total Rwetee 20,519,000 7,516,075 13,002,925 36.63 Total Twe:as fi Beginning Balanos 170,605,001 EM24II'IIMES: Sere of Joint Works Trot. Platt fi Reserves 55,616,000 5,035,434 50,580,566 9.05 District Trunk Sewer Costr fi Reserves 54,084,000 508,995 53,575,055 .99 Pad FEtire * and Inbumt F]xpenee 41806,313 52969 4,753,344 1.10 Sere of Joint Works Operating Dge ses 9,604,000 4,212:987 5,391,013 43.97 Provided for Reixdaseoent Agreements 0 0 0 .00 District gyrating fi Otter Mgweibres 724,000 383,936 340,064 53.03 Total EgMrlditores 124,834,313 10,194,271 114,640,042 8.17 F 3 Fad 160,410,730 `,•✓ FPCMJTIES EXPKa QI Balance Adjustments Transfer TO Salanoe 7-1-86 fi Additions Fixed Assets 12/31/86 CMaTRXR= 1N PROMESSS: Increase Pmgaug Capacity at Sunflower Diversion Structure 9,098 9,098 FClid relief Trunk 2-10-1A 13,996 13,996 Olive uni)Ifnnk 2-5R-1 38 38 tto�qg-tema Financing Plan 639 141,846 142,485 a.ri:d/tkw Hope Placentia Master Plan Otte 35,161 1,835 36996 2-14-M Manhole Press a Protection @ SA Intrptr 114,312 227,495 341:807 Taft Interespoor Sexes From SPM to Glassell 2-6-2 11721 481 2,202 FullerbmVnm Interceptor 2-25 370,133 84,374 454,507 Crargethorpe T.rtnk Oxnection to SAM 2-22 13,093 412 13,505 Fairview Alst Interceptor Sewer 2-23 161,473 76 161,549 Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station Mcdifnn 2-24 I'm 29,294 30,415 Steal 697,653 508,945 1,206,598 Share of Joint Works 7,876,819 5,035,434 (24,552) 12,887,701 CIP Integration Adjustment Ski �T.taTax 7,876,819 5,035,434 (24,552) 12,887,701 Calq IPD NEVERN, PfAW fi Sum i and fl:operty Rights 517,694 517694 _/lsctio n LL3lreress and Rmp Stns 51,691,329 51,691:329 Vktmrnt Facilities 1,186 1,186 DisPceal Facilities 33,172 33,172 General Plant and Adm'n Frail 68,913 68,913 Hputy in Joint Treatment Frail 64,330,400 (48,965) 24,552 64,305,987 Other Assets at Oust Less AMXt. 44,463 (8,617) 35,846 Dotal Property Plant fi Syuip 125,261,629 5,486,797 0 130,748,426 COMM SMUTL Q' 4 OI9fl¢(T NO. 3 S nM 9MRM= rnPNCnL FEPQA 6 M3MS MMED 12/31/86 BU0= R6,1h14 1 , 1986-87 F6iaini g Ye -T--.Date Buriget Year-To-Date Budget 8 Dme ded Beginning Find Balances, July 1 152,778,646 IBMNOM: Tex Levy Mond Fund(s) only) 500,000 0 500000 .00 Tax Amlcmtlons/'& ntiDta (Stare of 11) 8,520,000 4,167,773 4,352:227 48.92 Federal and State Construction Grants 726,000 0 726 000 .00 Oxffmation Mess 600,000 262,789 337,211 43.80 Other Fees 1,552,000 48,144 1,503,856 3.10 Sale of Capacity Buts 1296,000 75,968 1,220,032 5.86 Interest & Nfsc. Receipts 5:567,000 3,538,993 2,028,007 63.57 Other 0 0 0 .00 Dotal R venue 18,761,000 8,093,667 10,667,333 43.14 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 160,872,313 F7 PENDITORM: Stare of Joint Works Tnnt. Plant & IYsaves 63 715 000 5,387967 58 327 033 8.46 Trunk District Sewer Onstr & Reserves 43:197:000 229:730 42:967:270 .53 Bond Retirement and InWiest Bgense 5,371,038 45,873 5,325,165 .85 Share of Joint Works Operating ilnpenses 1D,L51,000 4,195,638 6,005,362 40.84 Provided for Reintursement Agreements 0 0 0 .00 District Operating & Other Expenditures 1,057,000 346,758 710,242 32.81 Total m9anditures 123,491,038 10,155,966 113,335,072 8.22 F}ding Ftad Balmer 150,716,347 FACII= E PX491M Balance Adjustments Transfer To Balance 7-1-86 & Adiitiuns Fixed Assets 12/31./86 02UMOCRT0:4 3N PFOMWS• 3-30 Elimination of Direct Corm to Knott Swr 54,130 54,130 Mrnn Financing Plan 679 153,752 154,431 Nina-Bolder Vault Rehab 40,961 21,548 62,809 3-00-1 Pemve Hazard Ave Sulfide Ctl Stn 91677 0 9,677 Hoover-Western Relief-Ian, & Katella 24,573 24,573 Orange-Western S3,tnnk Relief 3-25 29,170 29,170 sjb Total 105,060 229,730 334,790 Share of Joint Works CIP LtAgration Adjustment 8,428,278 5,387,967 (26,271) 13,789,974 Sub-Total. 8,428,278 5,387,967 (26,271) 13,789,974 OXVRM PfCPEMY, PLW & B7m Fed and Prorty Rights 280,231 280,231 Collection Iunns and Pump Stns 55,268,649 55,268,649 Treatment Facilities 15,036 15,036 Disposal Facilities 28,419 28,419 General Plant aol Adnin Fecil 162,500 162,500 ty in Joint Treatment Fmcil 68,834,177 (52,393) 26,271 68,808�055 Assets at Cost less Amort. 61,049 (9,664) �'"`7/8�5 Total Property Plant a Ekltdp 133,183,399 5,555,640 0 138,73T,039 COMM SMIIMO= DESMU=M. 5 MM46 QM HMO FD FEFOU 198&V iaaini:g Ye -To-Date Budget Year-Mo-Date -Bu*jet % Mpmded Beginning F1xd Balaroee, July 1 29,466,545 Ii6YFF81B5: Tax Lew 09ord Fund(s) only) 24,388 14,327 10,061 58.75 Tax Al]aatiac/Slnbventiore (Share of 1%) 2,063,000 952,945 1,320,055 46.19 Federal and State Ctostruction Grants 126,000 0 126,000 .00 Csnaction lees 371,000 198,873 172,127 53.60 Other Fees 713,000 307,325 405,675 43.10 Sale of Cmacity Bights 226,000 16,391 209,609 7.25 Ti:terest & t4isc. Feneipts 921,000 511:830 409,170 55.57 - Other 2,473,000 0 2,473,000 .00 Total Revenue 6,917,388 2,001,691 4,915,697 28.94 Total Revenue & Beginning Balatars 31,468,236 Sate of Joint Works Tom. Plant & Reserves 1:066,ODD 929,565 5,136,435 15.32 District Tnnk Seer O=tr & Reserves 10103,000 79,564 10,023,436 .79 Bond ReH.aent and 1iuest flgrasta 22,915 21,427 1,488 93.51 Sere of Joint Works Operating Hgxlees 1,555,000 709,186 845,814 45.61 Provided for BeishursonenI AgreMMnts 67,000 0 67,000 .00 District operating & Other Bgrnditures 498,000 187,545 310,455 37.66 Total Fmpenditures 18,311,915 1,927,287 16,384,628 10.52 F� Fond Wa nose 29,540,949 FACUiTJ'84 EX?A16ICN Balance Ad ustanta 'Transfer TO Balance 7-1-66 & bare Fixed Assets ]2 6 MUMU•IIM IN PECGRES. 5-28 Baysida & J as P/S Maveal 1,996 1,996 Bitter Point P/S Upgrade 5 & 6 6,469 30,687 37,156 Variable Fmgerrg Romp Intl at Bay Bridge 21,991 21,991 5-27 1$71xa Ttnwn Stvr3 Lidb P/S S A" St P/5 3r007 17,854 20,861 Pahab of Peninsula Thank "A" no "G, Street 358,292 355 358,647 5-19-M "B" Trunk from Bitter Pf P/5 to Valve 5 & 6 1s,098 5,904 24,002 Increase FDect Service at Lid: P.S. 13,398 13,398 replace Lido Force F1ain 5-26 36,617 22,767 59,384 Nest Thank Phase I 2,033 2,033 A & B Vault Net ProteCtion 5 & 6 167 167 Sub-1bta1 460,072 79,563 539,635 Sere of Joint Works 1,454,097 929,565 (4,532) 2,379,130 CIP Integration Adjustment Suk>-Total 1,454,097 929,565 (4,532) 2,379,130 0XKMD Ply, PLANT & B2M T-od and Property Rights 6,231 6,231 �.ection L1rws and Pxp Ste 8,816,102 8,816,102 t Facilities 7,347 7r347 orsiaa Facilities 7,115 7r115 General Plant and Alain Facil 24,851 24,851 HVuty in Joint Treaooent Facil 11,875,686 (9,040) 4,532 11,871,178 Otter Assets at Nst Less A rt. 25,700 (8,056) 17,644 Total Property Plant & F3prip 22,677,201 992,032 0 23,669,233 COMM SANIDATION DI9IICLCr NO. 6 stream QMM= FIImIC /31/86 ffiIDGET IMIM1986-87 et Year-lb-Date � Yea Expenied r Beginning Ftad Balances, July 1 17,362,774 RME GESe Tax Levy (Band Fund(s) only) 16,875 9,525 7,350 56.44 Tax Allacetions/Siwentions (Sure of it) 11008coo 512,171 495,829 50.81 Federal and State aiatruction Grants 129:000 0 129,000 .00 Oonnecticn Fees 812,000 458,205 353,795 56.43 Other Fees 1,307,000 537,393 969,607 25.81 Sale of Cspwity Rights 231,000 14,428 216,572 6.25 Bkerest & misc. Receipts 509,000 263,613 245,387 51.79 Other 800,000 0 800,000 .00 Total Revenue 4,812,875 1,795,335 3,017,540 37.30 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances, 19,158,109 HO?E OTTURESt Stare of Joint works Trnt. Plant & Reserves 6716,000 964,643 5,751,357 14.36 District Tank Sewer C=tc & Reserves 1:295,000 32,311 1,262,689 2.50 Bond Retirement and Interest EKpemsm 31,365 30,520 845 91.31 share of Joint works Operating Expenses I,631,000 650,870 980,130 39.91 Provided for Rsintursenent Agreements 0 0 0 .00 District Operating & Other Expenditures 157,000 59,199 97,801 37.71 Total Espeditures 9,830,365 1,737,543 8,092,822 17.68 IIdirg glad Balances 17,420,566 FACIGI'T1Ei EX2MI(N Balance Adjustments Transfer Tb Balance 7-17-1=86 & Additions Fired Assets 12 6 OONSTRUMM Dl PROGRE4Ss 14-1 Project Report on Districts 6, 7 & 14 14 14 msron Tranmalssic n Facilities Bitter Point P/B Upgrade 5 & 6 2,336 3.1,025 13,361 5-19-M 'B" Tri $aa Bitter Pt P/S to Valve 1,074 350 1,424 5 & 6 Fairview-Gisler Trunk 6-9 32,071 20,922 52,993 A & B Vault Wet Protection 5 & 6 60 60 StlMbtal 35,541 32,311 67,852 Share of Joint Works 11908,969 964,643 (4,704) 2,468,908 MP Integration Adjustment 93Y4btal 1,508,969 964,643 (4,704) 2,468,908 ODIFISINJ PROPEM, PLMT & SDQIPt Collnnation 13reatyandd Rights Stns 1,2431076 1,243,076 Trestreent Facilities 21653 2,653 Disposal Facilities 7,394 7,394 General Plant and Ada Fwil 84,362 8&-3362 Dauity in Joint Treatment Facil 12,323,880 (9,380) 4,704 12,E 04 Owt]nneeir Assets at Cost Less Mort. 28,836 (4,959) i I Total Property Plant & Equip 15,235,273 982,05 0 16,217,B88 6 MIME ENDED 12-31-86 `J EAD30 IRVIH4 1986-87 Reining Year-To-Date Buiget Ya&r-To ffite -Budget H flmadad Beginning Fund Balances. July 1 59,465,443 IMENGES: Tax rm7 03ad FVd(s) only) 0 0 0 .00 Tax Alloatiors do:s (Share of 1%) 2,861,000 1,239,765 1,621,235 43.33 Moral and State on:stnction Grants 140,000 0 140,000 .00 Ozraction pees 1,000,000 215,404 784,596 21.54 Other Fare 560,000 54,745 505,255 9.78 Sale of Capacity Bights 250,000 24,096 225,904 9.64 hlterest 6 Misc. Receipt 2,026,000 1,293,427 732,573 63.84 Ober 8,440,000 0 8,440,000 .00 Thal revenue 15,277,000 2,827,437 12,449.50 18.51 W:al R' enure S Begiming Balaces 62,292,880 E MENDITUREl' Share of Joint Works That. Plant a F03serves 14,024,000 1,057,599 12,966,401 7.54 District TCM* Sewer Cnatr 6 Reserves 20,912,000 1,769584 19,142,416 8.46 .Bad retirement and Interest 661,190 418:827 242363 63.34 Share of Joint Works Operati g }]:Fences 1,863,000 853,785 1,009:215 45.83 District Operating 66 Other H naes 767,000 339,338 427,662 44.24 Total anpenditcces 38,227,190 4,439,133 33,788,057 11.61 E, 7 Plat Balances 57,853,747 �•/ PPCIISTIM EXPANSION Balance Adjustments Transfer 1O 8a7ane 7-1-86 6 Adlitias Fixed Assets 12/31/86 C09190=104 IM PROGFESS• 14-1 Project R:pat on Districts 6, 7 6 14 14 14 Cannon Transmission Facilities Mmftule Adj re Orange Cry. Agrmt. 33,251 33,251 Vaf Kansan Trunk 7-8 1,6 6 7 Master 837 837 ite �rviewS Yaunk a nnection 7-9 2,583 2,58.3 Mery St. r Of elief Sewer 7-2C-4 230,336 (7,996) 222,340 Main Street PmP Station 578,115 1,744,074 2,322,1m Sftmotal 831,507 1,769,584 2,601,091 Share of Joint Works 1,654,379 1,057,599 (5,157) CIP integration Adjnsbent 2,706,821 91bmotal 1,654,379 1,057,999 (5,157) 2,706,821 CUPEBM Pr PIIO.R, PLMr 6 B VW �atr property and Ps 986,254 986,253 i Strns 21,986,250 21,986,25a s4eataat Facilities 0 0 veal Facilities 15,334 10,782 Plant aa1 Admin Facil 11,334 15,334 Eldty in is at Treatment Facil 13,535,063 ((61169) 5,157 13,506,203 Other Assets at Oct Lean Anon. 35,063 (6,169) 28,894 Total Property Plant & B*dp 38,321,102 2,810,730 0 41,131,832 m@BY suam 72Qi vL=cr NO. 11 Samw mu 6MOST FII� i 1986-87 Remaining Year-mo-Date Budget Year-To-Date -Budget : awarded Beginning Pad Balances, July 1 39,962,223 10JESFffi: Max IeVy (Bind Fund(a) only) 88,580 40r460 48,120 45.68 Tex ALI^at+^m/Slwentdae (Blare of 11) 1,954,000 921,265 1,032,735 47.15 Metal and State Cretruction Grants 166 000 0 166,000 .00 Osacctim Pees 925,000 310,103 614,897 33.52 Other Fees 273Goo 16,394 256,606 6.01 Sele of C9IaCity Rights 297:000 100603 196,397 33.87 Interest a misc. Ieripts 790,000 515:227 274,773 65.22 Other 118,000 0 118,000 .00 Total Ievenlue 4,611,580 1,904,052 2,707,528 41.29 Total Ievenue & Beginning Balances 41,866,275 EXPENDITURES: Stare of Joint Wake Tnnt. Plant & feaervea 9,099,000 1,231,235 7867,765 13.53 eer District Trunk S OoreReservestr & Reserves 3,166,000 6,225 3:159,775 .20 Bad tetir I end Interest FS�ave 71,637 17,265 54,372 24.10 Stare of Joint Works Operating �penasa 2,236:000 988,820 1,247:180 44.22 Provided for Raimbasmm* Agreements 0 0 0 .00 District Operating & other Expa:ditures 435,000 146,007 288,993 33.56 Total expenditures 15,007,637 2,389,552 12,618,085 15.92 Ending Fund Balaoms 39,476,723 ` FPCUZTEES EMNSION ice/ Balance ustments Transfer To Salannce 7-1-86 & hiss Fixed Assets 12 6 CXP151 UMICH IN PECGR 3S• agah �l ieguiranants for Cast Trunk a Holes 46 46 Oran Avenue Project Report 6,134 6,134 Misr Charge to Cad Work Order 45 45 Skin.Total 6,225 6,225 � e aU djustnant WPorju 1,925,993 1,231,235 (6,003) 3,151,225 Sub-Total 1,925,993 1,231,235 (6,003) 3,151,225 ammmD PRTMY, PfINf 6 B]OIP: land and Property Rights 146,986 146,986 Collection lass and Pimp Boa 18,371,527 ;;,371,527 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 3,053 3,053 General Plant and Adnin Facia. 32,664 32,664 Wty in Joint Treatmart Fact]. 15,729,490 (11,972) 6,003 15,723,521 r assets at coat less amat. 6,994 (1,312) 5,682 Total Property Plant & SgAp 36,216,707 1,224,176 0 37,N, �93 COMM SNUMMON IA911i1CP ND. 13 ia> nu 1986-87 pAget Yesr�te � 8 F` Beginning FUd Balances, July 1 5,758,361 IE/FIif : Taut Levy 03o d Fund(s) only) 0 0 0 .00 Tux Allocatione/SiJumntias (Snare of 1%) 0 0 0 .00 Federal and State O.xstruction Grants 1,000 0 1,000 .00 C:ruection Fees 525,000 3001 000 225r000 57.14 Oder Fees 36,000 18,033 17,967 50.09 �of i = d. Rights 0 4 6et SMac F ipls 429,000 232,37 196,62 54.17 Other 1,000 0 71,000 .00 hrtal lied 1,062,000 550,407 511,593 51.83 Wal Revenc+ 6 Bagiming Balanges 6,308,768 EXPEN)171 5IIM: Sere of Joint Works Trent. Plank a I4:secves 619000 8,769 610,231 1.42 fives District Monk Sewer Qxstr a 5,844:000 439 5,843,561 .01 Bad Retirement and Interest 0 0 0 .00 Sere of Jointt4xks Operating�s 34,000 11,211 22,789 32.97 DiDis�icctt Operating OOthe. DWe d'tuses 80,000 129,817 (49,817) 162.P lbtal Egendituce. 6,577,000 150,236 6,426,764 2.28 F_ 7 Fund Balaroea 6,158,532 `•r' FACII.1 M E1D'AfMM Balame Adjustments Transfer To Balance 7-1-86 s Additias Fixed Assets 12 86 02MUC= M PAS: District 13 Ftmmtion 135,385 439 135,824 S .-7btal 135,385 439 135,824 Sere of Joint Mbrks 13,718 8,769 (43) CIP Integration Adjustment 22,444 S JIbbal 13,718 8,769 (43) 22,444 CPw= PFCPEMY, Plata 6 ]31f/IP: land and Property rights 0 0 mlle:ent wll and Ptmq� 8frta 0 0 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 0 0 General Plant Joint T eatmn Fact: 0 0 SAutyn=mts Cst but AmXt. 111,9000 ll in (85) 43 ,858 0 0otal Prosy Plant 6 B*dp 261,003 9,123 0 270,126 00= SANIMUTCt4 DMMCT NO. 14 SMM� QM=U Fl MONIES REM SAL RIMU HOOGEf 86 HSITEN 1986-87 Raueining Y�rte Budget Year-To-Date -Budget 8 agmded Beginning Fend Balances, FY 85-W 11,748,899 RBMNMS: Tax levy Mad Pads) only) 0 0 0 .00 Tat AUrcatims/Sbeentims (Stare of 1%) 0 0 0 .00 Federal and Stoamecticn Fees � � 0 0 0 .00 Ober Fern (nm) 4,055,000 2,532,104 1,522,896 62.44 Sale of Capacity Rights 255,000 0�8 2((55,000 .00 OtherDiterest S Minn. Receipts 41 ,6000 0 88,490 418,44990 �.73 Total Rmenue 4,741,000 2,620,599 2,120,401 55.28 Total ArmflUe S Beginning Balances 4,369,498 EXPENOMERES: Sate of Joint Works That. Plant S Reserves 20,250,000 1,064,615 19,185,385 5.26 District 'Trunk Sear Cxstr 6 Reserves 1,372,000 20,444 1,351,5% 1.49 Bad Retirement and Interest Expense 0 0 0 .00 Sacs: of Joint Works Operating 99aaoes 253,000 0 253,000 .00 Provided Raimbur Agreements Operat e. E]s Other Expenditures 131,006 3,353 127,647 256 District O Total Ekpeditrmes 22,006,000 1,088,412 20,917,588 4.95 Ending Had Relates 13,2S1,086 l� , Balance Adjustments Transfer Tb Balance 7-1-86 S Additions Fined Assets 12 MIS RUMM 1N FOQd'SSs 1 Project A�eporttm Districts 6, 7 S 4 14 14 Coamon Tcarsmission Facilities District 14 F®tion 3,659,677 20,419 3,680,096 Sto-Tbtal 3,659,677 20,444 3,680,121 Share of Joint Works 1,665,353 1,064,615 (5,191) 2,724,777 ClP Lmegration Adjustment SdYh*al 1,665,353 1,064,615 (51191) 2,724,777 034Pf1D PfpOtoPEp M, Pf747Y S BIIIIP: land and rights ODuectim Lirear�and paw Strs 2,576,947 2,576,947 Treatment Militias 0 0 FacliGeteerallPlant and Main Peril 0 0 Ssity in Joint Treatment Facil 13,728,43.0 (10,352) 5,191 13,723,249 Otter Assets at Oat Leas Amort. 0 0 Total Property Plant a Blaip 21,630,387 1,074,707 0 22 7P�W4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 10844 EWS AVENUE J P.a BOX 8127 y March 2, 1987 MOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUPORN1A 92728-9127 914)962-2411 9141 E40-2910 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE February 25, 1987 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Present: OTHERS PRESENT: Don R. Griffin, Joint Chairman Director Dan Griset Don Smith, Vice Joint Chairman Director Bob Hanson Ronald B. Hoesterey Director John Kanel Buck Catlin Director James Neal Richard Polis Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Evelyn Hart Finis Carleton, Carleton Engineers James Wahner and Consultants, Inc. Richard B. Edgar Jack Kelly STAFF PRESENT: John H. Sutton Sally Anne Miller J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Supervisor Roger Stanton Blake Anderson, Director of Operations Bill Butler, Director of Finance Absent: None Bill Clarke, Superintendent Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering CONVENE: 5:30 p.m. Gary Streed, Chief Admin. Assistant ADJOURN: 7:55 p.m. 1) Communication from City of Fountain Valley re Conditional Use Permits Tor Plant No. 1 Expansion and Improvements. Treatment Plant No. 1 was originally constructed at its present site in the 1920's. In 1957 the City of Fountain Valley was incorporated and the Districts' Plant No. 1 is situated in the most southeasterly corner of the City's boundaries. During the past 30 years the Districts and the City of Fountain Valley have had an excellent and cooperative relationship. For example, the Districts have allowed the City to use the treatment plant site for police and fire � -Iartment training, civil defense training and supplies storage, and other similar accommodations. These have all been done informally without the need for contractual arrangements. -1- Executive Committee Report March 2, 1987 Recognizing the impact that operation of a sewage treatment facility could potentially have on the adjacent community, the Districts have always made a special attempt to be good neighbors. Most recently, for example, the Boards have approved the expenditure of millions of dollars in improvements at Plant No. 1 to construct facilities for odor and air emission controls and, further, declared a policy of enclosing all future facilities for odor control . Certain other mitigation measures are also being implemented. Extensive perimeter and interior landscaping to beautify and screen the plant (support buildings are also located to help screen the plant) and front entrance modifications to improve traffic safety and circulation along busy Ellis Avenue are also underway. In addition, last year, in response to concerns expressed by the City over the potential extension of the Districts' service area boundaries which might trigger the need to further expand Plant No. 1 beyond what is currently envisioned, the Boards adopted a policy limiting service to those areas within the adopted sphere of influence of the existing Districts, and territory now served under contract. In 1983, the Boards also discontinued consideration of a waste-to-energy co-combustion facility at Plant No. 1 in response to concerns expressed by the City. Over the years, although the Districts have regularly briefed the City on proposed treatment plant expansions and routinely submitted proposed plans for support buildings (administrative offices, laboratories, shops and warehouses) for review and approval, the Districts have never submitted plans for the treatment plant facilities for approval, nor has the City requested such submittals. Recently, however, the City has formally communicated with the \./ Districts, declaring their intent to require the Districts to apply for conditional use permits for construction and operation of all facilities (see enclosed letter dated February 6, 1987). It is the opinion of the Districts' General Counsel that the City of Fountain Valley does not have the authority to require conditional use permits of the Districts (see enclosed memorandum dated February 17, 1987). The City's zoning ordinances do not apply to the Districts because the legislature and the courts have determined that one municipality should not be able to defeat the exercise of power of another public agency; and that where a regional type facility such as the Sanitation Districts' treatment plant (which provides the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal services on an exclusive basis for all of the other communities in metropolitan Orange County) operates within the scope of the political authority of a larger "regional" governmental unit, the regional agency's rights are superior because its responsibilities transcend local municipal boundaries. Otherwise, for example, if the City chose to use its zoning powers to control facilities improvements and extensions at Plant No. 1, it could, in effect, preclude potential development of the other cities and the unincorporated County territory within the Districts' boundaries or spheres of influence, thus effectively usurping the land use decision making authority of the governing bodies of the other cities and the County. -2- Executive Committee Report March 2, 1987 Executive Committee Recommendation The Committee reviewed and discussed the conditional use permit issue raised by the City of Fountain Valley at considerable length and concluded that the City's position is inconsistent with the determinations of the legislature and the courts relating to overall local land use control , because such a requirement would not be in the best interests of all the communities within the Districts ' service area. The Committee recommends that the Boards of Directors authorize and direct the Joint Chairman to send a letter to the City of Fountain Valley reiterating the Boards' desire and intent to maintain the long-standing spirit of cooperation and excellent relationship between the Districts and the City including, as in the past, the practice of reviewing planned facilities with the City. The Committee further recommends that the Joint Chairman, in the letter of response to the City, propose that he and a small group of Districts' officials appointed by the Joint Chairman, meet with a similar group of City officials to specifically identify the City's concerns and the best means of addressing them. 2) Central Power Generating Facilities. The Central Power Generating Facilities Program has been approved by the Boards as the best means of utilizing surplus digester gas and complying with South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District requirements (see enclosed summary of the Central Power Generating Facilities Program dated February 18, 1987). The staff briefed the Committee on two of the pending matters relative to the implementation of this program: the purchase of air emission credits required by SCAQMD; and acquisition of the engine generating equipment for the facilities. .The Boards have previously authorized negotiations for both the purchase of the air emission credits and the engine generating equipment. Staff reported that negotiations for purchase of the required air emission credits were proceeding in accordance with the attached report and the direction given by the Committee. The staff and consultants expect to have a recommendation for the Committee's consideration at the next meeting. Staff also reported that negotiations with Cooper-Bessemer for purchase of the engine generating equipment had been concluded the preceding day. A price of $18,968,113.00 (plus applicable sales tax) for the equipment, spare parts and services was negotiated as outlined on the enclosed summary dated February 25, 1987 Revised. The Committee authorized the staff and General Counsel to finalize terms and conditions in an agreement with Cooper-Bessemer for consideration by the members at the March 25th meeting. 3) Other Pending SCAQMD Matters. Staff updated the Committee on the status of the following pending matters relative to obtaining necessary South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District permits to construct and/or operate Districts' sewage treatment and disposal �"f facilities: -3- Executive Committee Report March 2, 1987 A. Waste Digester Gas Flares at Plant No. 2. On February 5, 1987, the SCAQMD Hearing Board considered and approved an interim variance to operate the existing flares at Treatment Plant No. 2 while new flares are being constructed. The flares are used to burn currently surplus digester gas. The existing flares cannot meet SCAQMD requirements and the Directors have previously taken several actions regarding replacement of the flares in response to violations received from SCAQMD in August and September of 1986. B. Selective Dilution Technology for NOx Control for Existing Di ester- as-fueled Internal Combustion En fines at Plants 1 and 2. he SCAQMD Nearing Board is also considering an appeal by the Districts of an SCAQMD staff denial of the Districts' proposed control plan for NOx reduction from existing engines, required under SCAQMD Rule 1110.1. The control plan, submitted in April of 1986, proposed the use of the selective dilution technology to meet NOx requirements. However, in November, 1986, the plan was denied by SCAQMD. Under Rule 1110.1 three of the Districts' engines were scheduled for NOx control by December 31, 1986. Our staff and consultants have presented information to the Hearing Board in support of the use of selective dilution technology to meet SCAQMD requirements. On December 17, 1986, in response to the SCAQMD staff denial , the Hearing Board granted an interim variance to allow use of the engines until the appeal is heard. Since the first of the year the control technology has been operating in accordance with the conditions of the interim variance. On February 19th, at the request of SCAQMD staff, the Hearing Board continued the hearing to enable their staff to meet with the Districts' staff and attempt to work out a compromise. C. Odor Control Projects at Plants 1 and 2 (Primar Sedimentation Basin Covers and Malodorous Air scrubbingsystems). For over a year, the Districts have been attempting to secure acceptable permit conditions to allow construction for the primary sedimentation basin domes and air scrubbing equipment for the odor control program. Permits were recently issued by SCAQMD, however, they contain numerous conditions and restrictions that would impair our ability to effectively operate the sewage treatment facilities and meet our NPDES Permit requirements imposed by EPA and the RWQCB. The Districts are committed to achieving the air quality standards of SCAQMD, however, conditions that do not affect the quality of air emissions but hamper water quality objectives are unacceptable. An appeal has been filed with SCAQMD to change the unacceptable conditions and the respective staffs are working to resolve the issues. 4) Fiscal Impact of Proposed Orange County Freeway Authority. The Orange County Transportation Commission has proposed formation of an Orange County Freeway Authority to establish a 30-year program to divert $25 million a year from future increments of local property tax revenues from the County, the cities, schools and special districts, including our Districts, -4- . T Executive Committee Report March 2, 1987 �./ to finance improvements to Orange County's freeway system. These funds would be reallocated annually to the proposed Freeway Authority from each taxing entity based upon each agency's proportionate share of the annual ad valorem property tax allocation. Implementation of the Freeway Authority's proposed financing method would divert $580,630 per year, or $17.4 million over the 30-year life of the Authority, in Sanitation District tax allocations. At the Committee's October 29th meeting the members reviewed information on the proposal provided by Supervisor Stanton (copy attached to enclosed staff report). The Committee decided to continue to monitor the proposal and asked staff to prepare an analysis of the impact on each of the Sanitation Districts. Enclosed is a staff report outlining the projected fiscal impact of the proposed Orange County Freeway Authority's financing plan on each of the individual Districts as well as the Districts as a whole. Attached with the staff report is the above referenced communication from Supervisor Stanton which outlines the County's analysis of the fiscal impact of the proposed Freeway Authority on all taxing agencies, and advises of the Board of Supervisors action requesting the Transportation Commission to consider other methods of financing freeway construction. Also attached to the report is a recent (January, 1987) communication from the Transportation Commission which requests comments regarding a proposed scope of work for an economic study of the Freeway Authority financing plan; includes a letter from former Supervisor Nestande which offers a number of alternatives to the Freeway Authority financing plan; and includes a critique of the proposed Authority's financing plan by the Orange County City Manager's Association. Executive Committee Recommendation Following a review by staff of the enclosed report on Projected Fiscal Impact on the Sanitation Districts of the Proposed Financing Strategy for the Orange County Freeway Authority, the Committee members discussed the proposal . Although the Directors recognize the pressing need to develop additional funding to meet the County's transportation needs, and are supportive of the Commission's efforts to do so, it was the consensus that the Transportation Commission should seek alternative funding sources instead of proposing a reallocation of ad valorem tax revenues. The Committee recommends that the Boards of Directors authorize and direct the Joint Chairman to inform the Orange County Transportation Commission that the Districts' Boards oppose the proposed plan to form an Orange County Freeway Authority to establish a program to divert ad valorem taxes from other public agencies to finance improvements to Orange County's freeway system, and urge the Commission to seek alternative funding sources. 5) Preview of Proposed Industrial Waste Ordinance Revisions. The Districts Industrial Waste Ordinance regulates all industrial and commercial dischargers to the Districts' sewerage system. The current version of the ordinance was adopted in 1983. The staff and legal counsel are now in the process of drafting an update to the ordinance to incorporate recent �./ requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency and to clarify certain provisions and simplify and streamline administrative and enforcement procedures. -5- Executive Committee Report March 2, 1987 The staff briefly reviewed the enclosed summary and outline of the proposed Ordinance revisions and the tentative implementation schedule, and sought direction from the Committee regarding the Boards' policies relative to local agency exemption from sewer use charges and connection fees. The Committee directed the staff and General Counsel to draft the amended ordinance retaining the existing provisions that exempt the local agencies from sewer use and connection fees. 6) Ocean Discharge Issues. The Joint Chairman commented on the Committee's recent review of evolving ocean discharge issues, particularly as they relate to extension of the Districts' NPDES/301(h) permit beyond 1990 and the Districts' proposed deep ocean sludge disposal research project, and outlined his plan to appoint a committee made up of the members of the Select Committee to advise the staff along with Directors from the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Newport Beach to work with staff on planning for these matters. 7) Staff Report on Stringfellow Program. Staff reviewed the enclosed monthly report on the Stringfellow Plant operations for January 1987. The Stringfellow pretreatment plant continues to operate well within the standards established by the Boards. 8) Executive Committee Meeting Non-Smoking Policy. �../ The members established a non-smoking policy for Executive Committee meetings. IIftW -6- o�E00tiiq/N4 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY �9��FNaN1v @V��o- CITY HALL 10200 SLATER AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 February 6, 1987 Mr. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca 92708 RE: The Districts' Compliance with City Codes and State Law Dear Wayne: We have reviewed the Districts' current building and master plans for your operations within the City of Fountain Valley in regard to compliance with our planning, zoning, and other laws. The City Council has asked that I relate to you the City's position that the following laws apply to the Districts ' operations: 1. Government Code Section 65401 requires that the Districts submit its list of proposed public works projects recommended for �./ planning , initiation, or construction during the ensuing fiscal year to the City' s Planning Commission for its review and report as to conformity with the General Plan. 2. Government Code Section 65402 mandates that no public building or structure may be constructed or authorized until the location, purpose, and extent of the building and structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the Planning Commission as to conformity with the General Plan. 3. Government Code Section 65403 requires that five-year capital improvement programs be submitted to the Planning Commission for review. 4. Government Code Section 53091 provides that local agencies such as the Districts must comply with the City's zoning ordinances. As you are aware, Fountain Valley Municipal Code Section 21.40.040 (M-1 Zone) , Subsection (23) sets forth that sewage treatment and disposal plants are subject to the conditional use permit requirements. It is the City's position that all significant expansions, modifications or alterations of the Fountain Valley facility done subsequent to the creation of the M-1 District in 1971 would require a conditional use permit. No conditional use permit has ever been issued to the Sanitation District. Page Two The Districts' Compliance with City Codes and State Law We have identified the following pending projects as being subject to the above requirements: 1. A 41 ,000 square foot addition to the Administration Building . 2. The plant entrance. 3. The new laboratory consisting of approximately 20,000 square feet of new area. 4. The new headworks facility. In addition, there are other proposed projects that may be implemented in the future as set forth in the Districts' document entitled "Masterplan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities" dated April 1983, or in the document entitled "Master Plan of Support Facilities for Plant Numbet One" dated January 20, 1986 that also fall under the above review requirements. We also believe that the Master Plan of Support Facilities for Plant Number One should be subjected to the environmental review process soon. Consistent with our understanding reached in 1983, the City, as a "responsible agency" , does hereby request that it be sent all appropriate Notices of Determination that may relate to any of the above projects. In order that I can report back to the City Council , I would appreciate a response as to the Districts ' plans to comply with these laws within two weeks of the date of this letter. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Judy L. Ke4sey-- City Manager JLK:ARB:bjs CC: Mayor and City Council City Attort,,.i Planning Director Board of Directors - Or. Cty. Sanitation Districts Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq. 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1000C February 18 1987, Pa BOX 8127t2) WUNiGIN V<LLEY.CALIFORNIA 92128-81 2l pta1992.241123611 014I540-2910 CENTRAL POWER GENERATING FACILITIES PROGRAM Background In 1985 the Boards approved the "Digester Gas Utilization Study" which addressed the most efficient use of digester gas produced as a by-product of the sewage treatment process, and the best means of meeting new air pollution control requirements. New stringent rules being imposed by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on large internal combustion engines that are now utilized extensively in our plants as prime-movers caused this study to be undertaken. The digester gas is an important energy source. Because our digester gas production is expected to increase and because necessary master planned improvements to our treatment facilities will add to our energy demands, staff had recommended that the study be performed before proceeding with facilities design. The study concluded that there were three viable alternatives: 1) sale of the digester gas; and 2) upgrading the existing engines; and 3) central power generation, either a single facility serving both plants, or separate facilities at each plant. 1) Sale of Digester Gas �./ Sale of the gas produced by the Districts to the local gas utility (Southern California Gas Company) was estimated to have the lowest, but a positive, present worth or the least favorable alternative. However, an updated estimate now shows a negative net worth which makes it even less feasible because of the higher cost of compressing and treating the gas to new SCAQMD standards as well as the purchase of standby generation equipment which would be necessary under this alternative. 2) Upgrading Existing Engines The alternative of upgrading the existing engines to comply with SCAQMD requirements was originally estimated to have the second most favorable present worth. However, continued use of the existing engines with their lower fuel efficiencies and high cost of emissions control may no longer be an alternative under continuing SCAQMD rula changes. Based on discussions with SCAQMD staff, it is now known that future SCAQMD goals for reducing the emissions from stationary engines will probably preclude long-term use of the existing engines . 3) Central Power Generation The originally recommended central power generation alternative was the construction of central power generation facilities at each plant, sized to use available digester gas. This would have resulted in a 3.8 megawatt installation at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and a 5.7 megawatt installation at Treatment Plant No. 2. This alternative had the most favorable present value in 1985. Brown & Caldwell Consulting Engineers, retained for the development and preliminary design phase of the project, -1- A have completed an updated economic analysis. Based on the preliminary engineering work, the costs originally estimated in 1985 have been adjusted upward due to increased size of the project (from 9.5 MW to 17 MW) to take advantage of a Federal Energy Commission program that actually helps improve the economics of the project; the increasingly stricter SCAQMD BACT requirements; as well as the difference in using the slower-speed, cleaner burning engines which are more expensive initially, but less costly in the long-tern to operate. The estimated purchase cost of SCAQMD air emission offsets have also been added. The consultant's revised cost estimates are as follows: Cost Estimate Project Payback 1985 Cost Estimate (for 450 RPM $27,000,000 6.6 years Engines) 1986 Cost Increase a) Increase in size from 9.5 MW to 17 MW (excluding standby) 17,000,000 b) Increase in cost for clean burn engines 2,000,000 c) Emission offsets (max. estimate) 7,100,000 Total $53,100,000 4.8 years This project continues to be the most favorable alternative. Another sub-alternative would be construction of an 11.5 megawatt plant at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and a 16.8 megawatt plant at Treatment Plant No. 2 at a total cost of nearly $90 million. These facilities are based on the projected peak electrical demands and would allow sale of surplus electricity at off-peak hours. However, because the size of the plant exceeds the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) criteria, the natural gas purchase rate is much higher, and the economic return less. The currently recommended alternative is the construction of central power generating facilities at each plant with the size based on the construction of co-generation facilities meeting the FERC criteria. These facilities, a 5 megawatt installation at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and a 12 megawatt installation at Treatment Plant No. 2 are based on using all digester gas produced plus purchase of natural gas in accordance with FERC criteria which qualifies the Districts for extremely low natural gas purchase prices. The engineers have determined that the digester gas generated by the Districts has a current energy value of $4,900,000 per year, which will rise to $6,350,000 by 1995. The recommended installation of central power generation facilities at each plant is the most efficient (with appropriate consideration for reliability and system flexibility) use of this energy source and the best means for compliance with new SCAQMD Rule 1110.1, which regulates oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and carbon monoxide in the emissions from stationary internal combustion engines. The recommended central power generation alternative will reduce air emissions by 60%. -2- The central power generation facilities would utilize dual-fuel , clean burn engines. Future treatment and disposal facilities would be equipped with electric motors, powered by the central power generating stations, as �./ prime-movers instead of internal combustion engines. Twenty-five existing large internal combustion engines would be phased-out as their useful life expires. A. SCAQMD Required Air Emission Credits. To construct and operate the proposed central generation facilities will require SCAQMD air emission offsets. Such offsets will come from onsite (Districts ' treatment plants) emission decreases, Utility Displacement Credits (UDC's) and emission offsets purchased from other facilities. Preliminary estimates of onsite decreases and UDC's which may be granted have been made. Final estimates will depend on SCAQMD interpretation of regulations and emission tests yet to be conducted. Preliminary estimates indicate that onsite decreases and UDC's will not be sufficient to offset facility emissions. Therefore, offsets will need to be purchased from other sources. In October, the Directors received a preliminary report and authorized the services of a consultant to assist the staff and General Counsel in the evaluation and purchase of Emission Reduction Credits (ERC's) that will be required by SCAQMD in connection with the construction of the new central power generation facilities. At the Regular Board Meeting in December 1986, staff and General Counsel were given authority to negotiate for acquisition of air emission credits. Several negotiating sessions have been held with companies that may have available credits. It should be noted, however, that the anticipated credits required continue to change as SCAQMD revises its proposed permit requirements and as the consulting engineers refine the data. Thus, the following numbers calculated in January, which are an update of the estimates in the enclosed report prepared by Carleton Engineers, Inc., in December, should be considered as very preliminary, as the consultants believe they could range as high as $7.1 million. Non-Methane Nitrogen or Reactive Carbon Oxide Hydrocarbons Monoxide Total NOx (NMHC) CO Cost Estimated Credits Needed 300 270 440 Estimated Cost/Ton 250 @ $3,500 $ 8,000 $ 4,000 190 @ 3,000 Estimated Total Cost $2,400,000 $1 080s 000 $2,395,000 $5,875,000 B. Negotiated Purchase of Engine Generating Equipment. A key element of the proposed central power generating facilities was the identification of the specific engine generating equipment prior to application to SCAQMD for a Permit to Construct, and a Permit to Operate. SCAQMD will not consider permit applications until the equipment to be used has been selected so that they can evaluate its ability to meet their requirements. -3- Because preliminary engineering determined that only one engine manufacturer could meet the engine criteria and the anticipated SCAQMD requirements on a guaranteed basis, the Boards have authorized the staff to negotiate the purchase of spark-ignited engines (estimated cost $18-20 million) from Cooper-Bessemer Division of Cooper Industries. OJ -4- Carleton Engineers & Consultants Inc. 690 Etter Green Sweet-Pasadena, Califortie 91 lot 818-79&0972 Emissions Offsets Acquisition Introduction This memorandum comments upon the availability and liquidity of certain emissions offsets which will be needed by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) to obtain Permits to Construct from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) for two cogeneration facilities (Central Generation Plants 1 k 2). Carleton Engineers k Consultants Inc. has been retained by CSDOC to assist in the identification and evaluation of opportunities for acquisition of the needed emissions offsets. Two specific opportunities are currently available - one each for the acquisition of nitrogen oxides and reactive hydrocarbons offsets. Each of these situations is discussed. Offsets for carbon monoxide may possibly be available in conjunction with the acquisition of nitrogen oxides offsets. Summary and Conclusions Comments on the specific opportunities to acquire emissions offsets are summarized in Table 1. More detailed conclusions are itemized below. o Opportunities for acquisition of offsets for non-methane hydrocarbons should exist. o Opportunities for acquisition of offsets for nitrogen- oxides should be much more limited. o Opportunities for acquisition of offsets for carbon monoxide should be extremely limited. o The available opportunity for acquisition of non- methane hydrocarbon offsets is reasonable, and should be pursued. There would be no restrictions on the long-term liquidity of these offsets. o The available opportunity for acquisition of nitrogen oxides offsets appears somewhat overpriced. However, because this source can provide the entire amount of nitrogen oxides offsets required and may also be able to provide a large amount of carbon monoxide offsets 12/86 1 Table 1 Summary of Emission Offset Opportunities Contaminant Amount Needed Comment tone/yr Nitrogen Oxides 300 One source identified - this source capable of providing entire amount required. Asking price of $8000 per ton/yr is $1500 per ton/yr above anticipated top market value. Very few other opportunities (if any) to acquire a block of this magnitude. Offsets generated by shutdown - long term liquidity could be restricted. Non-Methane Hydrocarbons 180 One source identified - this source capable of providing most, if not all, of entire amount required. Asking price of $4000 per ton/yr is firm, and at very top of what is considered a representative market value range. Easiest contaminant for which offsets can be acquired - other opportunities could be available. Offsets generated by over-control - total long term liquidity. Carbon Monoxide 300 Source of nitrogen oxides offsets may also be able to provide a significant portion of required carbon monoxide offsets. Most difficult contaminant to offset - very few other opportunities likely to be available. Preliminary asking price of $3500 per ton/yr appears quite reasonable. A package offer for both nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide should be pursued. 2 1 at a very reasonable price, this opportunity should likewise be pursued. A joint offer to purchase the required level of nitrogen oxides offsets and all of the available carbon monoxides offsets should be made. The long-term liquidity of these offsets could be limited. Background Based on preliminary engineering activities to date, offsets for increases in the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO X) and non-methane or reactive hydrocarbons (NMHC) from the planned cogeneration facilities will be required pursuant to AQMD New Source Review requirements in order to obtain the necessary Permits to Construct. In addition, offsets for increases in emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) will likely be required. The current anticipated levels of offsets for NOx, NMHC, and CO are respectively 300 tons/yr, 180 tons/yr, and 300 tons/yr. These indicated levels of offsets reflect an offset factor of 1.5 as stipulated in AQMD regulations (i.e. , - a 1.5 lb reduction in emissions to mitigate or offset a 1.0 lb increase in emissions). Adequate sources of offsets must be identified now in order for the permitting process to proceed, even though the engineering effort which will define the level of emissions offsets actually required is far from complete. Current efforts to identify potential offset sources, therefore, must be based on worst- case situations, although there is some risk associated with acquiring a surplus of offsets. One opportunity for purchase of NO offsets and one opportunity for purchase of NMHC offsets have been identified. The potential source of NO_^ offsets may also be able to provide some or all of the required CO offsets. In evaluating these opportunities to make a definitive recommendation on acquisition, a market analysis of the availability of such offsets was made, and the issue of future liquidity was addressed should the project not go forward or should a surplus of offsets actually result as the engineering becomes more definitive. 3 Availability In attempting to identify opportunities for acquisition of the needed offsets, the AQMD was contacted to determine if significant amounts of re- duction credits for any of the contaminants of concern had been banked. Very few banking certificates for any contaminants have been issued, and nothing at the levels required for this project is available. Also, emissions brokers and others (primarily attorneys) who comprise an informal network dealing in emissions trading were contacted. For the levels of offsets being sought for this particular project , the general feeling was that: 1) There should be opportunities to acquire the needed NMHC offsets. 2) Acquisition of the needed NO offsets would be far more difficult although opportunities might be available. 3) Acquisition of the needed CO offsets would be the most difficult, with very limited, if any, opportunities. While such generalities are helpful, it remains difficult to quantify how many active buyers and sellers actually exist at a given time due to the limited and informal nature of the market. However, to develop a perspective of the number of opportunities that might be available for procurement of the needed offsets, the most recent inventory of sources in the South Coast Air Basin was reviewed, to identify how many sources actually emit NOx, or NMHC, or CO in amounts equal to, or greater than the required offset levels. The results of this analysis are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The most recent year for which a complete inventory of source emissions is available, is 1983. (The data for this particular year are likewise being us_- in AQMD's current effort to develop revisions to the 1987 Air Quality Management Plan. ) In Table 2, the number of sources emitting either NO or CO at levels greater than 300 tons/yr, 1000 tons/yr, 1500 tons/yr, and 3000 tons/yr are indicated. Only the sources in the indicated categories are sufficiently large that they would even 4 � ( l Table 2 Number of Potential Sources of NO and CO Emissions Offsets Contaminant: NO CO x _ Offsets Requirement, tone/yr 300 300 Number of Facilities in South Coast Air Basin Emitting: More than 300 tone/yr 49 40• More than 1000 tone/yr 17 10 More than 1500 tone/yr 12 7 More than 3000 tone/yr 4 4 CO emissions at 24 of the 40 facilities emitting more than 300 tons/yr are generated primarily by mobile sources. 5 have opportunities to effect emissions reductions of the magnitude required. It can be seen that there are relatively few sources emitting either of these contaminants at the levels for which offsets are required (300 tons/yr in either case). Further, if we look at sources emitting at progressively higher levels which might have a surplus of emissions that could possibly be relinquished for offset use, the number of such sources becomes quite restricted indeed. Of further note is the situation for CO offsets, where at 24 of 40 facilities even emitting this contaminant at rates greater than 300 tons/yr, generation of these emissions results principally from mobile sources such that significant offset opportunities probably do not exist. Thus, there are very few sources even capable of providing the magnitude of reductions In CO emissions which may be necessary, and the opportunities to acquire such reductions will be extremely limited. Table 3 shows the number of sources emitting NMHC at levels of 180 tons/yr, 500 tons/yr, 900 tons/yr, and 1800 tons/yr. Although not quite as restricted as the number of potential sources where NO or CO reductions could be accomplished,there still are only limited sources at which reductions of the required magnitude could be effected. Liquidity In addition to the question of availability of emissions offset opportunities, the question of long term liquidity of any offsets actually obtained must be considered should the project not go forward after it has been permitted, or should CSDOC acquire a surplus of emissions offsets. A general per- ception might be that because of the restrictive nature of air quality regu- lations in the South Coast Air Basin, any emissions offsets represent a very valuable and scarce commodity whose long-term value can only appreciate. 6 Table. 3 Number of Potential Sources of NMHC Emissions Offsets Offsets Requirement, tons/yr 180 Number of Facilities in South Coast Air Basin Emitting: More than 180 tons/yr 88 More than 600 tons/yr 13 More than 900 tons/yr 7 More than 1800 tons/yr 2 7 While this perception if basically true, other aspects of the AQMD regulations make the manner in which the offsets are created a key factor in the liquidity issue. Basically, an emissions reduction created by equipment shutdown has restrictions on its use which do not apply to an emissions reduction created by "over-control" (i.e. , - emissions reductions above and beyond those specifically required by the regulations). The opportunity to acquire NO offsets is related to a pending cement kiln shutdown, while the opportunity to acquire NMHC offsets involves commissioning of a new incinerator not other- wise required by any AQMD regulation. The kiln shutdown which generates the NO offsets may also make some CO offsets available. a. Shutdown If an emissions reduction created by equip- ment shutdown is to be used to offset an increase in emissions by a new facility, the emission reduction must also satisfy a requirement that it be "contemporaneous." To meet the "contemporaneous" requirement, the shutdown which creates the emission reduction must occur after permit applications for the new facility have been filed, but before the new facility actually begins operation; i.e. , - there is a specific time window unique to each situation and project, within which the shutdown must occur for the emissions reduction associated with the shutdown to be eligible for use in offsetting the increase in emissions from the new project. The shutdown which will create the NO offsets has not x occurred, while permit applications for the CSDOC cogen- eration facilities have been submitted. Thus, the con- temporaneous requirement would be satisfied if CSDOC acquired the cement kiln offsets. Further, the cement 8 kiln operator would have some flexibility as to when the kiln must shutdown, since the cogeneration facilities are not scheduled to commence operation until the Fall of 1989. However, once CSDOC acquires the offsets and the kiln shutdown is effected, opportunities to liquidate any surplus offsets become quite restricted. Once the shutdown has occurred, only facilities for which applications are already on file are eligible to use the shutdown credits for offsets, and as time progresses, any opportunities to resell surplus offsets will diminish. Thus, there is risk in acquiring a surplus of offsets, if these offsets are created by equipment shutdown. It is difficult to quantify this risk, however. The anticipated increase in the number of resource recovery projects seeking air permits could provide a ready outlet for any excess emissions offsets that CSDOC has on its hands. b. Over-Control If a real emission reduction is effected when not required by any rule or regulation - e.g. , through instal- lation of control equipment not otherwise required - such a sit- uation is known as one of "over-control". In this instance, there are no additional requirements (such as the need for the reduction to be contemporaneous) which limit the use of such reductions for offsets. In other words, such reductions are totally liquid, and can be used now or at any time in the future to mitigate the impact of a new project. As such, emissions reductions of this type should command a premium over re- ductions effected by equipment shutdown. For the opportunity which is available to CSDOC, applications for banking certificates 9 should be filed with the AQMD once CSDOC has acquired title to the reductions. After the banking certificates are obtained, title to the necessary level of offset reductions can he relinquished when the permits for the new facilities are ready to issue, and the liquidity of any surplus emissions reductions is preserved. Review of Specific Opportunities a. NOX The cement kiln operator (Riverside Cement Company) will generate more than the needed level of NO offsets when its Number Two Grey Kiln is shut- down. Shutdown has not yet occurred, but will occur in the near future due to surplus capacity and the avail- ability of cheaper imported product. Riverside Cement is willing to sell a 300 tons/yr portion of the reductions in NO emissions resulting from the kiln shutdown to CSDOC for $8000 per ton/yr. The total cost to CSDOC is $2.4 Min. A down payment of 25% has been requested, with the balance due when Permits to Construct for the cogeneration facilities are issued to CSDOC by the AQMD. b. NMHC A manufacturer of agricultural chemicals (Amvac) has recently installed an incinerator to reduce emissions of methyl chloride. The installation of the incinerator was undertaken on Amvac's own initiative, and was not required by any AQMD rule or regulation. Based on initial performance tests, Amvac may have NINHC reductions amounting to as much as 205 tons/yr. A longer duration, more definitive test run is now in progress, to ascertain the level of NMHC reductions 10 which Amvac would be willing to sell. The asking price is $4000 per ton/yr. If Amvac can provide the full 180 tons/yr (which they are willing to do if the prior test results are confirmed during the test run now in pro- gress), the total cost to CSDOC is $0.72 Min. Other terms and conditions have not been defined, although the flaking price appears firm. C. CO The Riverside Cement Company Number Two Grey Kiln shutdown will also create a CO emissions reduction of approximately 250 tons/yr. Riverside Cement would prefer to sell the CO emissions reductions as part of atotal package which would include the balance of NO emissions reductions plus the reductions in emissions of other con- taminants. However, Riverside Cement might entertain a proposal to sell all or part of the CO emissions separately. The preliminary asking price is $3500 per ton/yr. If all 250 tons/yr of CO emissions reductions were available, the total cost to CSDOC would be $0.875 Min. No other terms have yet been proposed, although they should be similar to those proposed for sale of NO emissions reductions. Cash Flow Profile A cash flow profile for acquisition of NOX, NMHC, and CO offsets is show- 4- Table 4. This profile assumes a 25% down-payment for the NO and CO offsets, and a 10% down-payment for the NMHC offsets. An initial down-payment is generally made when entering into an agreement for the purchase of emissions reductions, with the balance usually due Table 4 Cash Flow Profile for Acquisition of Emissions Offsets Contaminant February, 1987 June, 1987 Total Nitrogen Oxides $600,000 $1,800,000 $2,400.000 (300 tone/yr @ $8000 per ton/yr) Non-Methane Hydrocarbons $ 72,000 f 648,000 $ 720,000 (180 tons/yr @ $4000 per ton/yr) Carbon Monoxide $262,500 $ 787,500 $1,050,000 (300 tons/yr @ $3500 per ton/yr) Total $934,500 $3,235,500 $4,170,000 12 �. when the permits to construct issue indicating that the offsets have been approved by AQMD. For the cash flow profile shown in Table 4, it has been assumed that the air permits will issue in June, 1987, and that all of the re- quired CO offsets can be obtained at $3500 per ton/yr (Riverside Cement may be able to provide 250 of the required 300 tone/yr). Discussion The opportunity for acquisition of NO emissions offsets appears some- what overpriced, based on information compiled on prior emissions trades. A range of prices which reflect purported recent trades was compiled from conversations with persons involved in emissions trading during efforts to locate sources of offsets for the CSDOC cogeneration projects. It can be seen from Table 5 that Riverside Cement's $8000 per ton/yr asking price is $1500 per ton/yr over what is generally considered top market value. The asking price is supposedly based on actual costs for controlling or reducing NO emissions, although emissions offsets have historically traded at price levels below what is recognized to be "coat effective" control. However, because this situation can provide the entire amount of required NO offsets and possibly, a significant amount of CO offsets, it must be seriously considered. It should be recalled from Table 2 that in 1983, only 49 facilities in the entire South Coast Air Basin even emitted NO at rates greater than 300 tons/yr. such that the opportunity to acquire the entire amount of required NO offsets in a single block should not be lightly dismissed because of price. Although there is no information available on purported selling prices for CO offsets, Riverside Cement's preliminary asking price of $3500 per ton/yr appears quite reasonable, given the information available on prices of offsets for other contaminants and the perceived difficulty in even finding CO offsets. It will 13 Table 5 Purported Pricing Information from Recent Emissions Trades Contaminant Selling Price $ per ton/yr Nitrogen Oxides $5500 to $6500 Non-Methane Hydrocarbons $1500 to $4000 Particulates $4000 Sulfur Dioxide $2500 Carbon Monoxide Not Available r.. la also be recalled from Table 2 that opportunities to effect reductions in CO emissions will be extremely limited. Therefore, given the availability of the entire amount of required NO offsets and the possibility of acquiring a sign- ificant block of the required CO offsets, a comined offer based on Riverside Cement's asking prices would be justified. It must be noted that since these emissions reductions will be achieved via equipment shutdown, there will be restrictions on long term liquidity should there ultimately be a surplus or should the cogeneration projects fail to go forward. The opportunity for acquisition of NMHC emissions offsets appears quite valid at Amvac's proposed $4000 per ton/yr asking price. Based on initial discussions with Amvac, this price appears very firm, as noted previously. It is seen in Table 5 that the proposed price is at the top of what is considered a reasonable range of trading prices for NMHC offsets. Because the emissions reductions are being achieved by over-control, long term liquidity should there be a surplus or should the cogeneration projects not go forward will be preserved. These offsets should therefore command a premium price because of long-term liquidity, and the opportunity should be pursued. 15 CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS 2/25/87 Revised JOB NO. J-19 SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF NEGOTIATIONS WITH COOPER-BESSEMER FOR PURCHASE OF ENGINE GENERATING EQUIPMENT Original OCSO February 24, 1987 Item Coo Per Proposal Staff Estimate Negotiated Cost A. Engines $18,811,000.00 $15,500,000.00 $15,100,146.00 B. Maintenance (5 yrs) Parts 8 Supervision 1,920,000.00 1,320,000.00 1,820,000.00 Labor 2,780,000.00 2,780,000.00 Not Included C. Controls 764,720.00 680,000.00 699,720.00 Subtotal $24,275,720.00 $20,280,000.00 $17,619,866.00 0. Additions Since January Executive Committee Meeting Staff Estimate of Value - Waste Heat Boilers 1,042,353.00 ) - Hospital Silencers (Upgrade) 70,588.00 ) - Major Overhaul (8 engines) 480,000.00 ) 1,348,247.00 - Additional Spare Parts 727,000.00 ) - Training 20,000.00 ) - Extended Warranty 564,000.00 ) Subtotal $23,183,941.00 $18,968,113.00 Less Maintenance Labor (2,780.000.00) TOTAL $24,275,720.00 $20,403,941.00 $18,968,113.00 E. Sales tax to be added to above amounts where applicable F. CO Reduction (3.5 g/bhp-hr to 3.0 g/bhp-hr) a . February 17, 1987 STAFF REPORT PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT ON THE SANITATION DISTRICTS OF THE PROPOSED FINANCING STRATEGY FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY FREEWAY AUTHORITY Background The Orange County Transportation Commission has proposed formation of an Orange County Freeway Authority to establish a 30-year program to divert $25 million a year of future increments of local tax revenues as a means of financing improvements to the Orange County freeway system. The funds would be redistributed annually to the Freeway Authority from each taxing entity based on each agency's proportional share of the annual ad valorem property tax allocation. The proposal would divert $17.4 million ($580,630/year) in Sanitation District tax allocations over the 30-year period. At the Committee's October 29th meeting, the members reviewed information on the proposal provided by Supervisor Stanton (copy attached) . The Committee decided to continue to monitor the proposal and asked staff to prepare an analysis of the impact on each of the Sanitation Districts. In January, 1987 we received a communication (copy attached) from the Transportation Commission; which: .. - requests comments regarding a proposed Scope of Work for an economic study of the Freeway Authority financing plan - includes a letter from former Supervisor Nestande which offers a number of alternatives to the Freeway Authority financing plan - includes a critique of the proposed Authority financing plan by the Orange County City Managers Association which also suggests other financing alternatives for the Freeway Authority and highlights the adverse financial impact the Authority's proposed financing strategy would have on the cities. The purposes of the following staff report are to provide Directors with a District-by-District assessment of the fiscal impact of the financing strategy proposed by the Authority on the Sanitation Districts, and to provide the Directors with sufficient information to determine if the Boards wish to take a Position and/or comment on the proposal, or offer suggestions on transportation financing alternatives. Proposed Orange County Freeway Authority In 19861 the Orange County Transportation Commission began to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of creating an Orange County Freeway Authority. The purpose of the proposed county-wide Authority would be to use a county-wide revenue base to improve Orange County's freeway system without raising existing 1.,.� taxes. -1- Creation of an Orange County Freeway Authority by the County Transportation Commission may be accompl'shed by: - the Commission calling a county-wide advisory election asking voters if they want to redirect property tax revenue into freeway construction - a county-wide special election to form the authority - the Commission directing staff to take steps to form a new special district under existing provisions of state law. The total annual incremental property tax revenue proposed to be diverted from all agencies is $25 million per year. However, even when combined with anticipated state and federal dollars programmed for Orange County, it will not raise all the money the County Transportation Commission needs to renovate and expand existing freeways during this century. The commission anticipates, however, that the local money would act as a magnet to attract more state and federal funds to the County. 1986-87 PLOnerty Tax Revenues and Promsed Incremental Tax Diversions Table A identifies the anticipated property tax allocations the Districts expect to receive as well as the amounts and percentages of each District's tax allocation proposed for diversion to the Freeway Authority, based on 1986-87 data. TABLE A Estimated `.✓ Anticipated 1986-87 30-Year 1986-87 Property Tax Diversion & of 1986-87 Tax Diversion District Tax Revenue to Authority Tax Revenues to Authority 1 $1,242,721 $ 34,793 2.80 $1,043,790 2 5,762,979 161,348 2.80 4,340,440 3 7,396,062 207,070 2.80 6,212,100 5 1,707,535 47,750 2.80 1,432,500 6 884,029 24,750 2.a0 742,500 7 2,090,601 58,531 2.80 1,755,930 11 1,655,077 46,338 2.80 1,390,140 13 (Note 1) -0- -0- -0- -0- 14 (Note 2) N/A N/A N/A N/A TOTALS 320,737,004 5580,580 2.804 17,417,400 —2- Notes: (1) District 13 receives no property tax revenue, and hence is virtually unaffected by this proposed financing strategy. (2) District 14 is 100% financed by the Irvine Ranch Water District, which uses several sources of funds to finance District 14's activities, including property taxes, connection fees, standby charges, and sewer service fees. Since District 14 is not directly financed by property taxes set aside specifically for the Sanitation District, the tax revenue loss impact on IRWD has not been incorporated into this analysis. The Orange County Transportation Commission proposal provides that the funds will be diverted to the Freeway Authority strictly from the anticipated year-to-year incremental increases in property taxes generated by addition of newly developed properties and turnover of existing properties. The following table presents the anticipated incremental increases in property tax revenues for the next four years (as provided in the County's analysis) , and identifies the total diversion of revenues to the Authority as a percentage of the incremental increase in revenues: TABLE B Anticipated Annual Total Annual Incremental Percentage Annual Percentage Increase in Tax Increase: Revenues of Incremental Fiscal Revenues: Districts Districts 1,2, Diverted Revenues Year 1,2,3,5,6,7 a 11 3,5,6,7,& 11 to OCFA Diverted 1986-87 $1,703,092 8.21% $580,648 34.09% 1987-88 2,532,282 11.29 580,648 22.93 1988-89 2,810,832 11.26 589,648 20.66 1989-90 3,620,026 11.23 580,648 18.61 This table highlights that a significant percentage of the anticipated increases in property taxes will be diverted to the authority, although the percentage will decrease on a year-to-year basis. Impact on Districts' Operating Revenues and Supplemental User Fees As the Directors are aware, the Districts' Revenue Program, adopted by the Boards in April 1979 as a condition of our acceptance of state and federal grant funds for construction of advanced treatment facilities at both plants, requires use of 100% of our ad valorem tax revenues to pay our ongoing operations, maintenance and replacement/rehabilitation costs. In the event a District's ad valorem tax revenues are insufficient to fully cover the District's share of the Joint Works O 6 M costs plus the costs of operating, maintaining and rehabilitating its collection system, the District must establish supplemental user fees to fully fund its' ongoing O s M requirements. At present, Districts Nos. 1, 5 and 6 have instituted supplemental user fees, and, as previously noted, District No. 13 receives no ad valorem tax allocations, and must generate 100% of its revenues from user fees. Based upon -3- cash flow projections included in the 1986-87 budgets, Districts Nos. 3 and 11 will also need to consider establishment of supplemental user fees in the next one to three years as their ad valorem tax revenue- become insufficient to cover escalating O 6 M expenses associated with advanced sewage treatment and disposal costs. In the case of the following Districts which must either presently assess, or must anticipate implementation of supplemental user fees in the next few years, to generate sufficient revenues to meet their ongoing 0 s M costs, diversion of property tax revenues by the proposed Freeway Authority will require fee increases to generate additional supplemental user fee revenue to make up the revenue lost to the Authority or, perhaps, earlier implementation of such fees. The following table presents the anticipated impacts on these Districts: TABLE C Estimated Revenue Increase in Diverted Estimated Annual Fee Annually to Number of Per Parcel Existing Freeway Parcels in to Recover Annual 8 District Authority District Revenue User Fee Increase 1 S 34,797 36,000 $0.97 $25.40 3.66% 3 207,094 175,000 1.18 N/A N/A 5 47,756 19,000 2.51 26.40 9.52 - 6 24,750 27,000 0.92 29.04 3.16 11 46,343 35,000 1.32 N/A N/A 13 -- 1,500 None Required 70.00 0.0 A review of this table indicates significant differences in the impact of the revenue diversion on the individual Districts. Districts 2 and 7, which do not appear on the table because they do not presently have or anticipate having to establish supplemental user fees for the next five years, appear able to absorb the lost revenue with little impact, at least in the immediate future. Districts 1 and 6 will be required to increase their existing supplemental user fees concurrent with establishment of the proposed Freeway Authority to recover the revenue diverted to the Authority. District 5's rapidly increasing property tax revenues may potentially enable that District to defer an increase in user fees to recover the lost revenue. Districts Nos. 13 and 14, the fastest-growing Districts, will not experience any impact on their O 6 M revenues from the proposal since they receive no ad valorem property taxes. Districts 3 and 11, the two Districts whose Boards will be considering implementation of supplemental user fees in the near future, will be required to establi-' higher fees than otherwise required to annually generate an additional $207,094 and $46,343, respectively, to meet their O s M requirements. The attached Statements of Projected Cash Flow for Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 also highlight the differences in fiscal impact on the individual districts affected by formation of the Authority. The first set of exhibits, labeled 'A/O OCFA (without the Orange County Freeway Authority) , identifies each -4- District's projected financial position over the next ten years if the Authority is not formed. .r/ The second set of exhibits, labeled WITS OCFA, identifies each Listrict's projected financial position over the next ten years if the Authority is formed. Line 3, titled O.C. Freeway Authority Tax Revenue Diversion on each of the cash flow projections in the second set of exhibits, identifies the annual, five-year and ten-year tax revenue losses each District can expect if the Authority is formed. Long-term Fiscal Impacts on the Districts Over the proposed 30-year period, the Districts would have $17#417,400 (See TABLE A) in anticipated property tax revenues diverted to the proposed Freeway Authority as indicated in the County's analysis. However, as pointed out by Supervisor Stanton, if you consider this on a net present value basis, diversion of $580,648 annually for the next 30 years (assuming an 88 discount rate) , represents $6,536,043 in 1986-87 dollars. Restated, this means that the Districts would receive $65,769,967 in principal and interest during the same time period if the monies are not diverted. The following table identifies the potential earnings by District on the funds proposed for diversion to the Authority: TABLE D District 30-Year Potential Earnings 1 $ 3,941,463 2 18,278,020 3 23,457,555 5 5,409,273 6 2,803,759 7 6,630,580 11 5,249,317 TOTAL $65,769,967 In summary, the Districts, both individually and collectively, will experience a substantial reduction of our major source of operating revenue if the Freeway Authority employs this revenue strategy. The immediate and long-term impacts of the proposed property tax revenue diversion differ significantly from District to District, with the less financially strong Districts generally experiencing a greater adverse impact. Further, the Districts which are growing the fastest and creating a major portion of the demand for increased freeway capacity will not be financially impacted at all by the proposal. In effect, the seven older Districts will be providing tax revenue to support freeway capacity to serve new development in the rapidly expanding eastern and southern portions of the Districts' service area. -5- Other Financing Alternatives As outlined in the supporting documentation with the Transportation Commission's letter dated January 22, 1987, there are several other alternative financing methods available to generate local funds to finance freeway construction. These include: - a local option gas tax - an increase in the state gas tax - a fee paid by employers based on the number of employees - a fee paid by employers based on the number of parking spaces provided for employees - a one-quarter percent sales tax - a one-half percent sales tax - an increase in the existing city/county developer fee program - any combination of the above methods. The Orange County City Managers Association points out in their white paper that street and highway construction has traditionally been funded by user fees and/or taxes, primarily gas taxes or license fees. Diversion of property tax revenues from their existing uses by cities, counties, and special districts appears to be a major departure from the traditional method of financing �...� highway/freeway construction. The City Manager's Association report recommends formation of a task force composed of City ,tanagers, Finance Directors and other interested/affected parties to explore other alternatives and options with the Transportation Commission staff. WHB.10A-D -6_ . ^ SUPERVISOR• FIRST DISTRICT ' ROGER R. STANTON OPLNOH COUNTY BOAPO Or SUPERVISORS ORANGE COUNTY HALL OF AOMINISTMTION 10 CIVIC CENTER 0I ,SANTA ANA,UIIFORNIA SIDOI-AOl1 PNOHE 81 3110 (AP4 COOS TA) October 2, 1986 Mr. Wayne Sylvester General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Wayne: As you may know, the Orange County Board of Supervisors voted on September 23 to ask the Orange County Transportation Commission to consider several alternatives in addition to the Orange County Trans- portation Commission's proposed Orange County Freeway Authority. I supported this cautious approach advocated by the League of Cities and several Special Districts because of the potential adverse impact such an Authority might have on our cities and Special Districts. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the Freeway Authority proposal considered by the Board of Supervisors last week, but not approved, in favor of this even more cautious approach. Clearly, improving Orange County's freeway system is a very high priority for our mutual constituents. Nonetheless, I believe that freeway improvements ought to continue to be primarily a state govern- ment responsibility. Flood control , local street improvements, sewage treatment, water delivery, police and paramedic services are examples of priority services which are primarily the responsibility of local government. Any local property tax revenue increases diverted to the potential Freeway Authority would be unavailable to local government for expansion of these kinds of critical services. From the very preliminary analysis on the potential Freeway Authority already conducted, the Orange County Sanitation districts would contribute approximately $17.4 million over a thirty year period in future property taxes to the proposed Freeway Authority. A present value analysis, using a reasonable 8% discount rate, reveals that this would cost the Orange County Sanitation Districts over $6.5 million in 1986 dollars over a 30-year period. Perhaps this is a reasonable contribution to make to help improve our congested freeways. Perhaps it is not. This is why I will continue to support a cautious approach to the proposed Freeway Authority. iOWRAINV/yL'-'I-WiAENGRJ'IE-M YOT -S TAANA-Tl1 -WESTMM mR In conclusion, the Orange County Board of Supervisors welcomes your comments and suggestions on the proposed Orange County Freeway Authority. Also, I invite your suggestions on other potential mechanisms for considering additional local contributions towards needed freeway improvements in our County. If you would like to discuss this issue with me personally, please call . Sin ely, Roge Stanton Super isor, First District RRS:smd Enc. cc: Executive Committee Members Fiscal Policy Committee Members Y iYPLRV180 R, /OURTX OIiTRIOT R A L P rT B . C L A S OXAIRMAN OU COUNTY HALL O 018INISTR TION f ORANOL R PLAZA. HALL Or AONINIB1ORNI N IO CIVIC CLNTLR P4SA.SANTA ANA.GIJ PORNM 04701 PMON[: 0YOY0IAR4 COOL TH CONSENT CALENDAR September 23, 1986 Honorable Board of Supervisors 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 A. SUBJECT: Proposed Orange County Freeway Authority SUMMARY: The Orange County Transportation Commission has proposed a redistribution of local tax revenues as a means of adding lanes to existing Orange County freeways. The Board of Supervisors is advised to withhold support for the proposal pending further details from the Commission. Honorable Board Members: (\ The Orange County Transportation Commission recently took action to begin exploring the advantages and disadvantages of creating an Orange County Free- way authority. The proposed Authority would be roughly patterned after commu- nity redevelopment agencies, but would use a countywide revenue base and would be designed to add new lanes to existing freeways without raising existing taxes. This proposal calls for a redistribution of existing and future property taxes and requires a detailed and disciplined process of public hearings, filings, and development of information. It is an innovative way to try to help our troubled freeway system; but, because it would redistribute existing resources in a new way, it is bound to stir considerable discussion and debate. Two Orange County Transportation Commission staff reports, plus a letter from Orange County Transportation Commission Chairman Harriett Wieder, are attached to outline the basics of this proposal . As you can see, there are still many unanswered questions to this proposal . And, although the idea is .intriguing, I believe the Board of Supervisors needs more information before we can commit staff resources to developing a more detailed plan. With this in mind, I would recommend that we authorize the Orange County Transportation Commission to prepare a proposal to create an Orange County Freeway Authority and to submit this more detailed proposal to this Board. Once we have had an opportunity to review the proposal and to better understand the costs and benefits of this concept, we can make a fair-minded ,judgment on its merits. s Item 10. ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION July 24, 1986 TO: Members of the Commission FROM- Stan Oftelie, Executive Director SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority On July 14, 1986, Commissioner Roosevelt directed staff to investigate the formation of a new government agency to build new lanes for existing freeways without raising local taxes. This report responds to Commissioner Roosevelt's request. BACKGROUND In remarks closing his service as the 1985-86 Chairman of the Commission, Commissioner James Roosevelt proposed a plan to use the increment of growth in property tax revenue as a source of funds to help expand existing freeways. The centerpiece in Commissioner's Roosevelt's idea is the formation of a new Orange County Freeway Authority to finance locally-funded freeway and highway projects and to channel the locally funded widenings and improvements through the existing State Transportation Improvement Program process. The I new authority, if created by a popular vote in Orange County, would place a share of existing property tax dollars into construction on existing freeways. Revenue from the freeway authority would not be used to construct new freeways. Over the past 10 years, Orange County has averaged about $25 million in state highway expenditures. To match the state contribution, and to raise an additional $25 million dollars a year, would require the new Orange. County Freeway Authority to collect about 2.5 percent of existing property tax revenues. In summarizing his proposal, which Commissioner Roosevelt said grew from his discussions on the feasibility of a State Constitutional Amendment for a larger share of existing state taxes, he said: 'The idea is simple and clear: we can take our destiny into our hands by using a share of the growth in property tax revenues to build new lanes on our existing freeways." DISCUSSION Property tax revenue in Orange County remains the largest source of local money available to local government. Countywide, the assessed valuation of Orange County exceeds $100 billion dollars and translates into more than $1 billion in revenue for local government TaS5 North Main, Suite 516. Santa Ana. California 92701 (714) 994-7581 - - TO: Members of the Commission Page 2 FROM: Stan Oftelie, Executive Director SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority agencies. Because of the count" annual growth rate (about 10 percent between Assessor Roll years 84-85 and 85-86) the countywide property tax revenue total has been growing steadily, despite property tax limitation measures such as Proposition 13. The formation of a new government agency to share in this property tax revenue can be accomplished in two ways: by new legislation or by going thrbugh a detailed process which includes approval by the Local Agency Formation Commission and by a countywide vote. This new government agency, if created by either method, would be eligible to negotiate a share of the property tax from each government agency which now receives property tax. This process does not increase taxes; it requires a re-distribution of existing tax dollars. Existing government agencies will lose some future revenue if they agree to negotiate a portion of their existing property tax share. To obtain perspective on the amount of loss each government agency would experience, the national accounting firm of Deloitte Haskins and Sells developed a model for revenue generation which examines the impact of a new Orange County Freeway Authority on each government agency (Attachment A). �J This model for revenue generation assumes that the proposed Orange County Freeway Authority would collect a constant $25 million a year in property tax dollars. This $25 million figure reflects the average amount of state and federal dollars spent on Orange County highways and freeways over the past 10 years. The $25 million per year in local dollars, even when combined with anticipated state and federal dollars programmed for Orange County, will not raise all of the money needed to rebuild Orange County's aging freeway system and to add one new lane in each direction on County freeways in this century. The local money should, however, act as a magnet to attract more state and federal funds to the county and to dramatically accelerate needed freeway construction. CREATION OF AN ORANGE COUNTY FREEWAY AUTHORITY Based on the suggestions made by Commissioner Roosevelt and existing laws, there appears to be three options available to the Commission if it chooses to pursue creation of the Freeway Authority: (1) A Countywide special election could be called and voters could express their views on such an agency. This special election would be advisory in nature and, if it is successful, special legislation could be sought to create this new district. In 1970, this procedure was used to create the Orange County Transit District. TO: - Members of the Commission Page 3 FROM: Stan Oftelle, Executive Director SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority (2) The Commission could direct staff to take steps to form a new special district under existing provisions of state law which allows the formation of Bridge and Highway Districts. This process would include hearings before the Orange County Board of Supervisors, the Local Agency Formation Commission, and would require a countywtde election. (3) The Commission could call for a countywide advisory election asking voters if they want to re-direct property tax revenue into freeway construction. After the advisory vote, steps to form the new authority through the Local Agency Formation Commission could begin. This approach would require two countywide elections on the issue, but would greatly simplify the hearing and negotiation process Under all of these options, the negotiations for a share of the property tax will be carried out under Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 95 through 100, commonly called AB 8 negotiations. / TIMING AND COST CONSIDERATION To qualify an advisory measure for the November 1986 ballot, the Commission must take action today (July 28) to request the Orange County Board of Supervisors to consolidate the advisory measure with the November election. The Board of Supervisors must take up the matter August 5 or 6 to qualify for the November ballot, according to Orange County Registrar of Voters A.E. Olsen. The Board of Supervisors may call for a special election at any time, but have, in the past, asked government agencies who request an election to pay for the election. A consolidated, countywide election, when held in conjunction with a June or November General Election, would cost the Commission between $10,000 and $15,000. A special election, held only on a Commission requested advisory matter, could cost as much as $750,000. If a countywide matter is consolidated with other elections (school board, city council, or special district elections conducted by the Registrar's Office), the cost figure would be greatly reduced. . Formation of a new district through the Local Agency Formation Commission requires a series of public notices, hearings before the Board of Supervisors, and a countywide vote on formation of a new district. Commission Counsel Clayton Parker believes the legal mechanisms are in place to create a freeway authority u0der existing provisions of law (Attachment B) through the Local Agency Formation Commission process. TO: - Members of the Commission Page 4 ( FROM: Stan Oftelie, Executive Director �.i SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority NEXTSTEP Members of the Commission should choose a course of action which: (A) directs staff to prepare appropriate ballot language and to present such language to the Board of Supervisors for the November 1986 ballot; or (B) directs staff to begin the process of forming an Orange County Freeway Authority through the Local.Agency Formation Commission process; or - (C) creates a hybrid approach which combines these two options; or (D) abandons this approach and focuses staff efforts on other projects. RECOMMENDATION: Commission Policy. C r` AT'j..-HMENT A (IMAGE COMMIT FREENAT AUIMRIII DUAL 10R A[VIMIE SNMIIM IRA ASSERTED PROPERTY TAX ' 25-06 16-97 17-91 00-99 19-90 ASSESSED VMMIIQU 199.29b196.661 199.111558.214 016.0198179506 Iltldtbtll d7l 1131551.1)I.70 WWTRII TAX 100.91690 sal.165501 ILI050.707 11.221.215d15 ILNLSIBJ77 IREEVN WIX REQUIREMENT 125.00.00 125.000.000 025,000.000 125.00.00 05.600,000 PIMCIMIRGC REQUIRED 0.0280 0.0252 6.0221 0.0203 0.0111 ADJUSTED IN 4961041OA7 1966.1050 0 .075.191.79j 11,126,216,115 1150511.70 05-81 WQUSIlo TINY WIN 86-17 fay WIN 17-60 fm NOtl RE-Bl fm WIX 09-90 am MINT FWD IUD DESCRIPTION REVENUE REVENUE REV[" REVENUE R M RELENT UK" REVENUE KEW" REVENUE REVENUE 0010-02 CYPRESS R[CIPARD 61N. 063.121 1711.912 121./10 $021,784 121.02 1916151 121.10 16025i561 121.412 16110510 121.02 0038 01 IRVING CITY 43,211,011 11520.907 190,124 61.03,402 090,135 13,076,494 690.135 11.112.121 190513 10,7/7.149 190.05 0030 01 NV CITY SI LIG MINI 1516.44S 6511.146 10,299 1591.22E 115,301 6658,052 115.101 1732,121 115.01 01/577 115.01 0030 25 TRY City 9 DIS• ADS 1275.101 6206,819 18.262 019517 18561 1355571 18.2111 13951111 61.213 1119.771 1B563 0019-01 Y0U LINDA fall 11,592.551 11,547.910 II4.50 61J23,151 111.3/1 0.117.123 114591 $2531,491 116591 0.1)1.102 644.391 0019-02 R (RLENR MINT 1 914,115 111,720 1395 05571 1395 BId.991 SMS 611.911 SIDS 121.013 1395 0019-01 YL LIG MINI 1 1142.00 1110.8)0 I4.000 1154.601 64,000 $112.050 66000 1196115 11.000 1213,911 1600 019-08 YL LAND MIMI7 19597 19.710 4200 110.019 USA 612,012 Sm 113.194 120 014'B99 00 Belt 0 YL IUD MINI 8 11,527 1149/ 111 B1.d52 143 U.039 $41 62,016 141 67,273 143 019-10 YL IUD MINI 9 1991 1966 126 I1.05 12B U.196 $28 11,111 128 11,161 120 0039-24 It CITY IIYRART 1911.599 1918,153 12b116 11,022.171 $26.119 11577.06 126.449 11,263.561 12dd19 $1.107.10 626.119 0019-23 YL 9 DISI ADD 147,571 641.219 Ib331 151,08 61,312 151.287 11.312 661,713 1150 DOSSER 61532 0040-01 MMalh CITY - 111.160.50 110.842,041 $312.464 112,07.07 1112.01 111./1t.951 9112,501 $14,911,723 1112.501 116.NL07 $112,501 0041 01 BEA CITY BASIC IDEA 12.10.200 42,00.084 60516 0.1215/6 $0,121 12.5658/9 140.123 12.06.m $0.121 01,199,036 160523 0042-61 RICAN PM[ Clly $3.441.347 01.116991 696519 61d21.978 1965d0 161/6215 191.16e I4.61O,01 06560 0529d0 196,160 000-01 COSTA MESA fill 17,121.512 61,116.50 0206963 67472.026 120.007 0.916,8/9 120.07 19,009.199 $20,007 110.110.611 1105.ee7 0011-03 We The DISI 1 0 AIG 1259 1252 17 1200 0 1312 - 67 1. Ila 0 00 17 0041 01 YEN PIG DISI 1 CM aM Bay 1121 It 4140 /1 $156 1/ INN 61 1193 11 0043 05 OX PAG DISI 2 CM AEG 1171 1166 0 Ries IS 1205 0 all 0 051 15 00 0) YEN 116 DISI 2 ED IMP I85 IB1 12 992 $2 feel 12 $114 12 1627 a 0041.25 EB 9 DISI AW 1126 0123 1/ 11J6 11 1152 11 flat /1 1188 1/ 0011 01 CORI55 fill 11.610.660 11.5/1J25 145,934 11.05.101 645,919 91,915,752 643,919 12.190,136 145.139 12,446,986 545.919 0014 02 CIP[Ill LIG DISI 2 9240.481 6213.749 16d31 1260,211 06.714 00.597 ladle Singles $6,134 1119.15 66,734 0014 25 [YP CITY 9 DISI WG 1697,217 1617.697 619,520 6154.OS 619,522 $839,610 119.522 $911524 119.521 11.011.025 $19522 045 01 1A PALM C111 1006.016 061.210 12/.806 1950,102 06809 11,066,918 624,609 61.187,074 124.801 11.30.781 01.819 045 02 LA PALM WN LIS DIS.1 123,140 02.50 1611 125.019 1618 127476 Bd18 631,013 tan 134.06 0641 0046 01 IODINE VMIES[III 12.050.151 62.719,420 680.029 03,03.210 180.611 $1.442.276 10.010 11.029,710 00.0111 U.259.90 10.09 004)01 FULL [III BASIC 0 OJD.10 0.520J1B 1116.625 18512J0 6216,650 19.10.636 1216.630 110,366A09 1216,60 111.30.311 1216.450 0040-01 (A1ON MOVE CITY 1/.760.515 1/.621.001 $111.261 65,151.542 1133A91 15.732. 7/ 4111.21PI 16,311551 1131.291 0.4164N 6111.299 0048 02 UNIT PN DISI 2 Go 90 195E 1926 127 61,011 121 11,141 627 61.276 - IN 61.119 127 0048 01 OX PAG 0151 2 66 I9 491 $555 Ill 1611 IM 160 116 1766 Ill IB52 f16 0040 25 GB 9 DISI WG 1126 $Ill 19 1355 19 Bill 19 11/D I1 6496 19 Beat 01 WN S11 CITY 114.505,492 slb09N0 1106.115 115.696J92 6406,162 $17,461.116 11ALId1 119./14,117 140562 621,616.736 0406,162 UD0-01 LB CITY BASIC 0 61,689.070 IJ.506.561 0103.307 63,992.911 0103.119 11.113.19E $101,119 16941,648 1101.319 10.10.915 6103.111 050 02 1B SI LIG DISI 1 112607 110.60 63.390 031.021 63,190 1145,906 13,390 $162.219 0,10 110.41S /1.10 0050 25 LB[III 9 DISI AUG 110.111 129.0) IB61 113.262 IBdi U2,616 1941 U1.10 1861 115.01 (Qdl 00 '.IA INNA city 13.221.250 13,111,016 190,241 OL IBT979 190551 61.091.50/ 690,251 I1511.106 190.251 /b2 111 /90.01 0 105 NMIIODS Lily 1626,69) 1649512 111.516 1676,116 I751B I156d0/ 111.50 IDb619 "I Ste 1 10519 00. NIUP00 111 city IIL025519 111.N0.20 I10L02 /11.960,160 ( .IUb10 06.619.05 110.10 $10,521,012 I10.117 120. .6 1191.10 15 IS ADAMEO fan MIN 86-87 fail MIN 07-19 flay 0TN B11-09 fain WIN 61-10 F:R ANN 1W0 FUND 1115441P110 UUNME MLENVE 1IVINUE SEVE)ME UVEDME UVEMN UUNIIE UVEMIE UVINU IIVENU 1 IVEMN 053 02 ASNI 05 SO BLIDA$1 LT 11.743 11,511 1245 69.414 1243 110,555 1241 1111741 610 111,0A1 1245 605125 MN city SP DISI DM 11.80 61.611 152 MCI& $52 12,243 152 02.06 111 62,176 152 0054.01 OY6R6[ city 61.1tO.M3 16,119.250 $201.317 67J01J24 MIMI) 68.69,19S 101.340 11.611.960 6201.114 010,715,125 6201000 00%01 MMINIIA city 12,018,491 11,941.984 151.513 62,164d72 656.519 62.410.751 156d19 12,706760 151,511 sh"11,01 114.511 057-01 S0 MEN city BASIC 92,001,741 62.121.300 110,441 61,011.041 670J50 63,I)S 9 A 118,450 II053O42 PL4M IL05,7110 09.450 0037-04 SAM CIIA SI IIMAVO 0 1165J11 6160,691 64.626 6118,896 14,629 1199,081 AMU 1221,031 64.629 120.10 64,629 0057-25 SAY CLEN city V D Au0 114.162 611.400 1962 1P.184 1962 141.011 6962 446,431 U0 151.201 1162 0058-01 59 City 61.419,171 /1A19.M1 646.299 61.557,584 640,101 11011,752 140.101 11,920,434 1/0J0 IL14sdll 190.301 OSBQS 59 SP 0151 AN 09.111 011,701 ILIIS 141,088 11.113 IIh9SO ILIIS 03,147 11.10 139,131 11,115 0059-01 MIA DNA city 114,596.349 114,)81.610 /108J52 113.)93J21 1400,706 117.57L542 MR,?" 119.356.029 I04Bd0 121032.1M 1408JOA 0060 01 SIM ALAN city 61.981.886 0,928.142 655,544 12.146.819 155.550 12.1Bh079 633.550 MADMAN 155,550 62,956d20 $55,550 006P01 SIAN10 CITY 1909.122 1801,016 625,459 6984,008 - 625,461 11.015.00 $25,462 11.218,306 123,462 11.153,121 625,462 ODA1-02 SIMON IVN SIG DISI 6126.816 0121.266 63.551 6117,231 91.551 $152,717 $3,511 6169./41 13.651 6108481 13,351 0061-2S SIANION UIC DISI MR 111.591 137,511 I1.0B0 641,761 11.081 646,471 61.01 151,704 11.081 07.511 11.001 0062-01 TuSIlN city 62.240.529 02.171,000 1621129 62.424,539 662.736 62,610,10 062.731 11.001.036 SUMS 41,315A19 142,736 0041-01 VIVA PARA CITY 1448,960 1414,190 012.510 6485,612 U2,571 $546,651 112,571 1101.511 412.571 1669.061 $12,571 0064-01 NISIMIN CITY 11.913.860 11.060.277 153,583 62,011,042 153.29 62,04,751 653.519 62,564,169 MIMI $2.02,12) 651.9/ 064-02 W516IN MM LID 0151 $122,503 1371.111 110,111 6414,004 418,711 1460,722 010,713 ULMER HOBO $50,142 110J13 606493 111 SPI[DISI AUG 110.68 11 IMS 13,042 6111458 11,042 1110,024 11.042 1145.550 61.042 6161.195 61.042 OOU11 MID CITY SAM DIS GEM 11.11L2)B 61J05J17 611.841 0.230.601 611.944 11,369.351 111.844 61,521J11 U1.014 61.04,911 111,844 00)01 GRM GRV SAN. CIST 1001.151 070.921 622,416 MIMI 122.410 1915,029 122143B 11,073.449 622,410 611194,211 022,438 0068-01 DANA PNI SAN 016 UN 6112.10 1123,061 19,105 1159,464 19,104 1400.256 0404 1445,301 19.10 149S.101 19,101 4069 41 IRV RCM WATER CIS I16,131 115.691 list 917.461 601 $19,431 $452 621,618 sin 124.046 6452 0069 62 IRV U11 IN CIS 1 GEM 640443 1411.452 612,411 141120M 612.492 1537,261 U2,492 $591.719 612,492 U64.861 111.02 0069-04 IRV RCN IN DIS 2 UN 6354,936 $144,907 19.914 4303.919 AMID 642)J09 110,914 1075,406 19,916 0571,704 19.936 00 05 IRV US IV 915 1 GIN 1251.450 6250.249 67.208 627B. 02 67.209 6310,041 17,209 1344,911 07Q6/ 1181.0% 11.20 0069-04 MY UN IN DIS104 UN 1221.90 620,690 6L270 0242.354 $6.211 1269,702 66,271 110.09 16.221 4111,251 16,211 000-07 IRV RCN IN 0ISM4 UM MA,664 604.119 612,506 $431d10 012,507 01141A 112,507 9592J61 612,01 11/b470 112,50 0069.10 IRV MIT IN 015105 MR 12,218 62,155 162 $2.40 662 12,67E 012 12.911 162 11,305 042 0069-12 IRV NCII IMP RAN UM 643,103 141.896 11,207 IUJQ 11,207 151.9E $1.207 01,14E 61.247 644,213 $1.207 0069-22 IRV RCM 1H 0152: UN 12.213 12.151 162 12.195 Asa 12.03 662 MRS IQ $3,290 162 0074-01 Ills M15M MAT CIS UY /0L414 102,104 $13.110 $514,459 111J12 15)2614 111.312 /06.153 $11,112 6700.404 113J12 0)I.01 MIN HILL VAT CIS GIN 11,07M42 0,049,413 $30.221 11,168,311 110,231 11,304,151 130.211 11,446.492 130.211 11,608.932 $30,231 M71-02 MIM N16 MAI DIS I UK 150928 1492,03S 114.111 1547.804 114.05 M09.622 114.1n 1616.239 U4.03 1751,405 $14,05 011-01 MIN NIG MAI ITS TA GN 650.225 /532,30 U6,901 LLI4.891 $15.911 104d01 II5911 slai.302 /ILIA IB46Ja& $15.911 001-05 MIN M16 VAI DIS 2 UN 121.22E 620.IM 6594 122467 $594 625,550 1594 028,016 My 631,629 619E 0011-06 MIN RIG MAI CIS 2A GO 6215,101 1228,715 16,588 1254,628 66.09 1283.162 1A.SIM $115,257 16,599 130J60 11,589 M)1-08 MIN HIS VAI CIS 14 0 1676,706 6AS).810 118.90 0Z)h 112.950 6815.416 61B,9M' 6106 )51 618.90 11,001.580 618.90 0)l it MIN NIG OAT DIS 4-3 6 M.793 10.I4) $1,450 156,047 11.450 162,112 66450 I0492 61.450 SMI13 0.40 00)1-14 MIN SIG VAI 015 4A G9 6168.726 1141,6E 14.713 6182,150 $4.713 1202.705 14,711 U25.521 14,713 620.846 14,111 04-59 MIN RIG MAI DIS 4A 16 616.BS4 918,32? 1528 120.401 1570 122.1E 6526 125,2&1 652E 128. M 152E 001-60 MIN SIG VAT DIS 4A-2G 147,331 14L9B6 13.325 151,196 61,125 FILMS I1,125 143.07 61,125 670,503 11.12S DOYI-61 MIN NIB VAI DIS 0-16 SLIMS? 1114.969 91.888 1150,261 61.809 U 000 QJOB U86,018 6LB0 6201.93E Q.MB 0071.62 MIN RIG MAI 01S 5A GN $159.095 1155,418 64,417 601.026 64,07 6192.552 11.471 1214.221 14,47) 0219d01 M477 0011 0 MIN XIS MI DIS 8 GN 120.916 Q0.406 IM 122,720 159E 125,214 1508 IN'130 6581 01,289 ISM 004 01 IRI Ely MIN MAI 415 GO 1201.715 1190.012 15.701 1220,406 15,104 $745,322 15,704 12)2,115 15.70E 1141,581 -67J0I 00L 01 CAP.BIM CSIy MAT CIS 6 I150J52 1146,311 64,221 6163,131 14,221 1181.50 61,221 1201.975 /4,221 1224,651 64,221 008E 01 1M.01I INIV M DIS 6 I650M1 j011.861 118.200 1103,449 /I11.02 1782.816 118.202 /MO1144 /I8d02 SIMMS II6.20 081 01 50.19 [NIY MAI D15 MY 003.)67 6295,201 I6505 1120,136 01506 1365,611 IL06 1401,010 1 111306 1152,)1? $0,504 0001 04 M.CSI [MIT MAI HIS 1 1425.01 6113.267 141404 1160.09E 01 T.905 6512.0E 111.90S 1569.631 111.9E 101.609 '11 L90 1 002.01 ISLA IS" VAI 015 UN 1117.431 130.05 68.817 630,090 10.0M8 1301.801 69.878 6424Ju2 08.M0 1472.485 101818 85-66 AIJISIED IRK MIN U-87 IRK WIN ".Be I1111 WIN 81-81 SW MEIN 09-0 1 SSK of" IUK SKI DESCRIPTION 0[KNU[ KAM REVENK KVIYIIE 1[KXK KKYK UK" REVIVE RIKNK UK" KKK 0003-01 L MM6 CIS MA 015 GO 1216,715 $219,008 A1.O7 1766.97E 16.100 6291A05 I6,908 1130.547 IL900 IAhM7 It.?. 081-01 SI.MA MIS CNU WAY 6 1116.561 6101.468 03.09S 1119.644 11.016 I1311145 11.096 1I40.111 /L096 116/B61 61.0'., 0086-01 Sul CO MI U15 CEO 6215999 6209.30 16,031 $233.028 16.031 6259.193 A/jolt 0280h06 16,011 130.O6 16j4. 090 01 It IMO 9A1 D15 DIN O69990 U59.619 U0A59 1100U111 IIOAO 1//5jIM 010,160 1195d10 IIOAO 1551.10 116.1 0092-01 ST. NNGTA OAT D15 ON 1301916 6295,116 18.510 $321.920 10,511 6166.011 10,511 1401.237 0,511 1432,970 IBA 092-03 51.NAMIA KI DIS IY 0 I1.306 0,213 10 13,5)7 111 03,901 191 I/d29 191 I4,921 1' 092-00 SI.MdMIA VAT DIS 29 0 02,55/ 112.201 1151 111.593 6352 115,111 1152 II6.620 1352 I11.7O IS 0093-01 IS ANTS CO YA1 Dig ON A62.AO 10.890 11,756 1670111 0.75/ 073.438 /1051 181.921 11.758 193.151 11>7'. 0094-01 WIN CD.CM SK Dig 111,411 61Ll50 $961 UT.240 19A/ 1/1.113 IRAN 116,106 $961 ISId01 A 19. 009)-01 CMAMAAI PIS 1197.121 6192d05 $5.536 1213,959 65.536 1216,104 IS'= $264,9O 65.336 6Oi'm ILS 010-01 OMDI CO. DIN 11011 II47j111.680 1112.995.868 14,110,820 6159,196.952 1/A19,191 6177,161.739 11.119A91 $191,162,651 $4,119,290 62O.111,041 16119,? 1201-01 CHIN ilia Dig GEN END 67.866.610 $7j61/.174 I2IDA4/ 0.512699 6220d70, $9,411,315 $2OA78 910,519.601 1220,270 IILIIL196 1220.7. 1211-01 MNG CO.EIK TO DIS 0 112,221.212 611,619.051 1142,161 113.22/.910 $3I2,201 114117.301 111201 IIA.371.90 012001 010.212.612 9117.71 2111-01 SPEC D151 ME. 11 ENB 141,043,104 I46636,O2 IId05,092 116,376j157 I1,101,212 151.834.330 61,205AO 157,6O.682 I1,O5.233 $61A/1.112 11d05.7: 2201 01 [LSN.VM MAT DISIEP,N6 /S 15 11 15 1G I6 10 16 10 P 2101-12 WILMS DIS BIOS CO /1 $1 10 11 10 II t0 I1 10 11 1 4001-01 MORE CB f10 CON Dig 0 117090465 112,219,767 9496,299 09.2159,709 1498.356 121,411A00 II0A51 623.813,654 6490,356 126421,415 1499.1. 4051-01 VMS[CO HARB KNIVES 116,190.510 115,911,119 1150.9ft 617.73L.611 S451.91/ $19B10A11 (12,9/1 $21,959.126 108.911 624,425.191 1159.9 40-01 MNGE CO SLUG AS DA I1,955J00 /1,O0446 I3Id31 12A14,110 154,161 I1,155A77 154,711 12.410,226 654,761 12.914.111 O1.1, 1101-02 ONNDI CO SLUG AMA 1169.880 A156.712 613.15A 1708.01 111.15? 4563.659 113.15) 1421,550 111A57 170.20 1110: 1101-01 NAME CO 61.116 RSMI 6112.542 /301J91 I6d50 1119A10 ABJSt SPLITS 611J51 1118J10 10051 $40.744 10.1t 1111-01 THIRD SEVER MINI 015 1411 1100 612 1116 612 IO/ 612 1352 $12 MIA I'. /111-01 DIVINED SUN MINI 1S 166.357 666199 11,858 O1,806 $1.62 01,90 11.851 100.90t I1,059 191.011 IL9: 4151-01 HARMONY SVR MINI 09.221 01.001 O,218 185,73 62.218 195d02 02,210 006dO 12,211 6110,059 62.2 4561-01 CMNII SK M I REV 1955.521 6928,169 12L752 I1,031.196 426.755 /1,150.471 926.253 U.780A96 126.755 61,421,961 IL.T. 4561 01 CO.SVC AN 3-LAG.016 M 11U20 14.1O 1121 14,O4 1121 65,202 9121 15J01 6121 16.431 IF 4581-01 GD.MC AKA / 101,629 1106,264 - 15.165 620.167 15,146 O10J61 13A64 00.71} 15,366 085.571 15.3. 4591-01 CO. 4%Aug 5 123,113 623.244 1670 $25.87) 0670 $10.797 1670i $12.011 IAN 115.611 It 4O1-01 COUNTY 5%AKA A 1I47,360 101.112 $12,524 I104.131 117.527 6518J6/ O2.527 1599,1O II2,527 6661.715 112.5: 4611-01 COUNTY SK MU B 081.911 6215,055 17.923 1304,218 67,924 O40J71 0.92/ 1119,130 17.924 1121.706 17.9. 4641-01 COUNTS 5VC M4. 9 I1,110.174 11.019.091 /11.02 61,201.311 131.096 11.116,119 131,O6 $1,487,40 631,001 $1LL34O1 /IIAI I671-01 [MNIT SK AKA 12 185,016 I0.711 12,302 192,085 62.383 002.471 12,311 611/.011 STAR] IO6j014 ILIA IO1-AI COUNIV SK MIA Il 1P1 INS AID flat Ito /119 Ito 150 Ito 6556 9.. 4711-01 CDMIT 6K MEN 16 f2bO0 126.261 056 $29.239 $757 10.339 037 116.01 PIT $40,267 0'. 4151.01 CMXIY SVC AREA 20 SYR 14.699 /1.567 1132 /LOB/ 1112 IS,659 1132 16,M $132 0,002 0: 4761-01 COUNI7 SK ME 21 0111J63 110.990 61.7?1 1145,010 O,773 1162,297 IL771 1180.551 61,1)1 6206,129 $3.1. O21-01 COUXIT SK AKA 22 47.870 O.150 1220 0.516 6220 12.O7 1220 110.511 12M 111J18 0. 4181 01 MKIY SK AKA 8 90.020 11500 /1.116 150.881 1100 06.621 61,311 642.996 $1AO O0jO1 Il.l: AB71-01 MNDI CO 0 DIN ATTAIN 910061 17,014 09.007 62,014 $07,922 62.011 10.010 I2,011 11MjO1 12.0. 1861-01 CHIT WE NK 11 IN A 126.508 925,811 011 O1072 Pll O2,018 IAA 615,622. Ill/ 139,621 I) 5041-01 611M M. LIB 015 DIN 6151.094 1112.767 $21.107 1015.810 O6109 f90hO1 I110O 11.010.069 121.10 01,123.400 621.14 5O1 01 TVA[[MIIA LIB Dig 150L611 1494,101 114A41 0550.415 / 4.212 1612.527 111.242 601.O2 614,241 051.000 $14.21 L5601 ONMK CO. C[M IRV a15 071015 019.60 $21,591 1034.515 O1.593 IU8051 01.595 IL611,01 111,595 0,149AO O1.A 5201-01 CAPSIMXO MT CM 59 101.O2 O9UO 12.287 100.100 62,187 690,151 f2.787 6109,424 62.287 /O1d0 R.21 521E-01 [VARIED MY SURE Dig 604,601 1119,153 15,448 1210,564 15,/19 1231.349 63.019 620.12) 65.149 I21Oj0O 95.44 5211-01 IOf[MCO BY IN. SK II40A)7 1114.125 91.151 IM0d5A 94.152 1110.561 14152 1198.660 11.157 1220A0 Wit 5 51-01 SISK CLNY SINM YAI PR 022.951 122.309 $641 124.016 16O 07.610 6643 110.1/9 EAU I14.102 161 01 CAPSIAND DAY PM 1 WE 121L219 1261.621 0,593 6291494 OA94 ❑2AAII 67.594 ❑610A IT 594 bl0l /O.S1 ' 01 SI%M NMI REC I PSY 611.155 $0,191 IL150 w 152 C ALIM 149.802 AId50 155.W ILI50 60 fldt 5 21 Al COME LMNIV KCIO CO IIA51O UO 05 11.121.968 1P 61.249.001 $12,321 15,370.419 U2J21 $1A16.190 1P.Pl .e0,161 411J1 I 0.86 ADA511D FIVE WIN at-0 ENT WIN 67-BB FINITE WIN 0-M "HIM WIN 19-0 00 MTN FUND FWD DESCRIPTION I[MNUE MVINIIF REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE Kum MVEWE IEVENNE REVERS MVE" KNEW[ 5111-01 [MIA 111%SW. 015 61 ' 110.012 197.60 11.812 DOWN 12.812 1120.91E 12.811 1114.5SM 12.812 11O.6M 12.812 5491-01 HASTE BN SWI.DISI 0110.626 1161.725 11.10E $119.910 11.101 031.Id1 I3.I03 1118.10 91.101 6141110 13.10E 5161.01 Caku CMOIIY VAT 0161 16950.21E 1481460 0139.591 15.156.7d3 6138.609 15O/b254 II11.109 Ib612.1/1 110)60 17,117,013 1111.109 501-01 0 HAI 016 A[S0V 17341E 111.592 62.062 1)9.492 $2.0O IBB.dBS 92.0I 198.667 62.062 610901/ 121082 5141.01 CIMESS 0 M1 015 111,121 011.195 112E 112.d86 112E 111.11E 1121 115.07 1321 $11.471 110 5971-01 STOW[NM0 HAT HIS 62.220 S2.196 $63 12.415 10 12.121 161 11.021 ill 16367 $61. 9021-01 MMG Call SAN.DIS 11 11.252.721 81.207.928 1111791 01.316781 111.70 '16196,537 111.717 11.06963 1E4O7 11.851.951 1AOO 901-01 CING(MIT SN DIS 12 65.762,919 151606611 6166119 06,216.202 116100 14.940.023 116100 61.721.176 U61.167 O.590.251 0161,167 9041.01 MNG[NIT SAM 015 0 OO91.042 O.10R.991 4207,070 $8.003,487 $20.094 1E.9O.O1 1040E 69,90 ,161 9201.00 111.021.951 107.094 9051-01 ONNO[NIT SW DIS 15 61,705,535 11,657O9% 117.70 I1,615.08 10.06 12.053.87E 117.156 12.20.051 1/6756 12,541.617 147,756 9061-01 MA TM1t 50 DIS 16 0804029 1059,279 0/050 056.611 12/053 16O1.505 121.75E 6108/.612 124151 11.111.421 040E 9O1-01 M0[MIT SN DIS 1) I7,090,601 12,012.020 150.511 11,262,298 158,518 12.50.590 050,O1 02.000.164 159.538 I1.II3,510 $9.111 091.01 REND THEY SM DIS 111 61,615,077 6660J19 10.11E $1091.05 11431E 11.03.11E 186.1/3 12.217.63E 1001E I2.466O72 114311 70I1-01 MARTIN NIGH GEN END $16221.951 115.767.707 /154172 617.551.211 195472E 09.515.170 10422E 621.714003 6554.221 126171.7O 1151.22E 7101-01 FLORIN NIGH MN ENO 116202 0M 111.85/.921 $427.870 116517.911 1427,921 118.401O93 1427,927 920.675,726 9/21.917 122,775,121 1/27O1 7141-01 NNT.BN NIGH 611 END 122.215.055 121,5I2.120 U2601 121.0311.455 1622.007 126051,106 072.07 129J62,140 1622,007 111.104005 1622,O7 )111-01 CST CO. COLLEGE MN f 122.831.612 122.198.120 1619.192 121.71422E 9619.10 027,502.026 /A19./67 130.591.50 661/00 114031.659 109.10 7151-01 CC ME GEN END /Id.327.010 015,670.115 1131.125 117.662.101 195).178 119.d62.195 1157.17E 626875.326 1/51.176 126131,902 101.0E 7451-01 RAN SN CC GEN 612.755.515 112.190N22 13511121 /O.O6114 1157,163 115.30.764 1157.16E 1O.O9JO 1O1.1O 119.00.197 057.161 710E-01 We MN OND 121.197.968 $72.910.01 101.801 tl5.127.816 607.957 U&N7.20 1657,957 914902,321 1651.957 135,017,752 1651.931 7611-01 MCA MINDA NI.GO.IH 65.500.991 15016.979 115401E 11,952,779 $154,011 98,621.526 1151.011 17J10d10 9154,011 18.197.012 1151.011 )d51-01 COSINE WI.G[N END 127.920.871 127,119,161 1101.710 130,211.964 1701,001 133.621.190 1701.01 117./00.01 $781.801 641.600.969 1781.801 7701-01 ON GRV UNI.MN FPO 972.510.012 121.000.50 1110121E 114.359.505 1610.316 $27.109.O4 1630,116 3- 10.159.7/1 1610.116 131,516,1/7 I1O1311 7111-01 LAG.DCH NI.6N END 15.910.814 15,286.571 1152.271 15.905.526 1152.291 46,549.606 1152091 0.286.90E 1152.291 I6O05.211 0152,291 2)51-01 NN'I NSA UNI.GIN END 131.118,511 116.296112 16015O19 "0.105.656 16015,500 111.914.611 11.011.10 150.025d30 11.015.50 s1s.611.5O 11.045.O0 7191-01 LOS KRIS NLG[N END 001/.060 67.366.8O 012.195 18.101.515 1212.211 19.07.026 I212.210 114.151001 1212.218 1162940E 6212.211 1BIP01 SAYS N1.6[N END O11169.40/ 430.E16281 IBM,IN U3440.111 1878d22 O1.1Od50 I8IB.222 101021.69E 1818,222 f41.140,681 18M.222 1851-01 nWINI1A NI.G[N FRO 116162.6E6 UW66.120 1196.516 115.315.701 1196.562 10.055.207 6196,562 118.97/.916 1196.562 021.105.811 1196.50 1101-01 51 YAL NI.MN(NO 126.269.29E 125.526.96E 6715.330 120.021OE1 9735.116 /11,62B.5)6 11O.II6 O5.198.615 1715./16 019,146.251 035.116 7911-01 SHIA MR ENT. MN END 1300041E 129.15691E 100.529 132.O0.612 1815.d27 116.169.02 1645,627 1/0.162.00 015.621 115.05.919 1115.62) 7961-01 IUSIIN 01. MM IND 117,571,616 60.087.11/ WNW $19,021,399 1492,240 17610019 1492.240 121.552.97E 1/0010 026.197.952 1492,240 1961-01 ININE MI. GEN ENO $25.00.0 1 025.001.377 6721,414 627,925,263 1722.580 I11.O1.52A am.= 934.576127 1122.10 I18d31.O1 1722.5O 2011 01 MM08 ELIN.6AN.FHD $16,206.112 115.151.00E 6453,140 117.5114M 1453.901 /19.516051 1151.01 I21O13J1d 1431.801 024,152,163 1E51.O1 $041.01 8NA PAR IIEN. GIN TO 0.09.692 61,00.271 0111.421 61.106.5E7 1114116 9EJ92,514 $111.0/ 15.O6948 IE11,43/ 15.9OJ20 1111./11 BOBb01 CMT6EA Etta. SIR END 41,9111616 11.05.270 1109.601 11.11d.196 1109.619 SW1/.959 1109,619 15O45,108 1101,619 15.834,128 1101,419 6131 01 TTINISS[1[a. GEN IN 11.982.21d 11.870J81 1111.191 11.109.11E I1111O6 1EJ9b626 111450 65.135,014 1111.5011 15.916.571 0311.506 0111.01 THIN 9M ELEA GEM END 0.211.116 15.06.01 1116.571 15.661.259 6146.540 16.O2.117 6146b10 17,011,714 1146.540 009t.121 6116510 0211-01 TERM[LIN MN END 18.918.10 IB.W).O2 1250.115 II.02124 1250.27E IIOdOd19 12011E 111.915,251 058127/ 11100.00 ItOO71 6251.01 MINN all[LEA am FRO 67.216.11/ 17.033.551 102.59E 17.010.11E 1207.616 /8114.071 102.616 19.691.907 1202,116 110./81.611 9202,616 92Y1-01 LA 16LM[I18 N 1.10 13.01.In 6l1A.1O 1100141 /62O.191 1108140 I607.506 1108140 15.01.90 1108160 13/0.190 1:0.70 817E-01 INTEL JNI LEAN LP EO 11. 61.692 $1.420166 110121 11.561118 1E0.926 /6160.231 10.928 14950d50 040.921 12.08.280 110.92E BllP01 LOVELL MI MY[NUM It 111.011 110,701 101 111.915 1300 116260 1101 11115E 101 116/0 6309 BLIP 01 RUMMIA fit"GN END 11.120147 0.011.151 I81.191 I1.1M.)06 10.607 0.761.170 187.07 11.191.062 1 IBbO1 11.662,01 W.O1 0411 01 NEON N[[IN MN IND $8.100.851 Ia.11410E 1216612 19100.IM 1236669 010,092.516 1214.669 111128W) O11.649 612.489,529 011.09 SMI 01 SAVWNA II IN GN FO 11,519.061 11.515101 114212 11/06615 t16237 11.902.518 164217 121114J04 116217 12.151,105 164.211 D11111E Y\Flog 11111.I Nl ... IL LV.IPO L\d 01./':0 II/..V'. 1.P.'1 .- .Vl - 11 .... ..n .... . .. U-U WAMELIA FAME WU U-87 FAME OFF 97-81 FIM1'WIM BB-U FARE AMH 19-90 FEU Witl FORD DUO USCRIP1101 PIVIMIII KAM UVIMME 1 WKM AIVIMMI RE%" PIK" UVIYIIE KKJK WVIIOI UHWE • 1711-01 7PIA LM00 ELEA UM IM3 /6591.115 I1,516,511 111.546 /6716811 116551 11,916,112 146551 17.11i'm 1/6551 62.376103 644,01 8811-01 WE W U SW w FMD 117.011.80 111.U4,675 1107.113 610.111.112 6477,180 120i522.137 0V)d10 122.811,410 1472.180 Irid96.171 0471,110 101721 SU2.130.176 /UT141.271 124M7.100 416/.163.511 15.000.000 IL075.191.717 125.000.000 61,196,211,115 UUUO.Uo 11.130.548.771 175.000.000 i. ATTACHMENT e uw oPRCEs PARSZT.'.T3 AND COVERT •INR1Nq W YYRp,�W y�IIM.110 W CuttON N.PANRER I901 FAST FOURM STREET-MITE 012 SAN 9 ARRnH)OAICE SPENCER E COMT,A m xORTN 0 ST.W.SUITE Ya NAROARET A 01I0E9TER UNTA AN&CALIFORNIA 92705 SAV SFRWPpNO.4lFOPNu y,pi CNAAtES I 1100 OI419T 2137 OIR EWvu w YN.w July 18, 1986 VERNAP.9ROJWUN REF.OUR Oft A7NN F.WNSON V 1. 4L L TNOWL4IOiN1Et3N1 Orange County Transportation Commission 1055 North Main Street, Suite 516 Santa Ana, California 92701 Attention: Mr. Stanley T. Oftelie - Executive Director Re: Proposed Method to Secure Portion of Existing Real Property Revenues for Highway Widening Purposes Dear Stan: By Letter of June 16, 1986, we addressed to the commission draft legislation to implement a new statutory method of securing a portion of existing property tax revenues for freeway widening. Subsequently, on June l7th, a meeting was held with the staff of the County Counsel' s office and the Local Agency Formation Commission concerning any other possible method of taking such steps without resorting to new legislation. I am enclosing herewith a copy of the existing Act for Bridge and Highway Districts. This is the act chat the Golden Gate Bridge District was implemented in and, most probably, is the only agency in the state chat has utilized the Act. Notwithstanding their utilization, the Act , itself, is an all-purpose act and may be utilized elsewhere in the state. This Act does authorize the formation of such a district by the Board of Supervisors calling a special election pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 27060. A majority of the registered voters voting at the election would be sufficient for the approval of the district. , A Bridge and Highway District does have the power to levy taxes pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 27169. Presumably, if such a district were formed, the voluntary method suggested by you for negotiating for a 4w OFFICES- PARKER AND COVERT COrange County Transportation Commission July 18, 1986 Page 2 share of taxes pursuant to those provisions of the Revenue Taxation Code contained in sections 95 through 100, commonly known as ABS, could be utilized for the purpose of securing some share of property tax revenues to be used by the Bridge and Highway District for freeway widening. The formation of the district is subject to the jurisdiction of the Local Agency Formation Commission and, before theBoard of Supervisors would have the power to order the election, the matter must be considered by such commission. A Bridge and Highway District would be subject to the hearing procedure set forth in Government Code section 56800 et seq. which requires the Commission to conduct a hearing on the matter and, subsequently, after the Commission's hearing, the matter would ,be re-referred to the Board of Supervisors for the actual conduct of the election pursuant to the provisions contained in the Bridge and Highways District Act. This procedure would preclude the holding of the C formation of the Bridge and Highway District at the November 4th general election. The Board of Supervisors would have the power to call a special election for the formation, which dates would be in March of odd-numbered years , April of even-numbered years plus June and November of each year. Very truly yours , � i�� la� con H. Parker CHP:pswl40l Enclosure Item S. i ORANSE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION August 13, 1986 TO: Members of the Commission FROM: Staff SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority Update �- On July 28, 1986, the Commission directed staff to begin the process of forming an Orange County Freeway Authority (Authority) through the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) process. On August 11, 1986, in a letter to Ralph Clark, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, Chairman Harriett Wieder requested that the county begin the LAFCO process (Attachment A). The following is a brief outline of the LAFCO process (a more detailed version is presented C in Attachment B), including an estimate of the maximum time required to accomplish each step. MAXIMUM DAYS ACTION REQUIRED o County prepares application package and 60 adopts a resolution of application. o LAFCO reviews completeness of application 30 and issues Certificate of Filing. o LAFCO schedules a hearing within 90 days 120 of issuance of the certificate and eves public notice of the hearing by mailing, publication, and posting. LAFCO reviews application, prepares a report including a recommendation on the proposal. The report is mailed at least 5 days prior to the hearing. o LAFCO conducts the hearing considering the 70 staff report, testimony, CEQA (environmental review) documentation, and makes determinations required by law. (Hearing may be continued for up to 70 days.) LAFCO approves proposal and issues a resolution to the county. 1055 North Main. Suite 516. Santa Ana. California 92701 (714) 834-7587 - TO: - Members of the Commission Page 2 C FROM: Staff SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority Update MAXIDfDM DAYS ACTION REQUIRED .. o County Clerk sets proposal for hearing within 35 35 days of LAFCO resolution date. o County conducts a hearing which may be �' fill continued for up to 60 days. County adopts a resolution calling for an election and forwards it to LAFCO and the Elections Clerk. Total estimated maximum days required for the process 373 A review of scheduled elections upcoming in Orange County shows the Presidential Primary in June of 1988 to be the most logical for scheduling a vote on the Authority. The Csop roximate additional cost to the county to add the Authority to that election would be $60,000-$65,000. A special districts/school districts election is scheduled for November of 1987, however, the estimated cost of adding the Authority to that ballot would be $250,000- $500,000. Based on the total estimated maximum time for the LAFCO process, the county should have no trouble in completing the process well in advance of the election. Once the LAFCO approval is obtained, it is valid for a period of one year end may be extended by LAFCO in one year increments. Staff is currently researching the possibility of obtaining a longer original approval period from LAFCO when a specific future scheduled election is the goal. If this is possible then any uncertainty of obtaining approval extensions would be eliminated. Staff will continue to monitor the Authority's progress and provide periodic status reports to you. RECOMMENDATION: Information Item. . 'V, .Q ATTACHMENT A ORANSE COUNTY TRANSPORTA770N COMMISSION August 11, 1986 Mr. Ralph B. Clark, Chairman Orange County Board of Supervisors 10 Civic Center Plaza �r Santa Ana, CA 92701 ' ' ''.Dear Ralph _ As you know, on July 28, 1986 the Transportation Commission received a presentation from - - its Executive Director, Stan Oftelle, regarding Commissioner Roosevelt's recommendation relative to the formation of an Orange County Freeway Authority. The purpose of forming i this new authority would be to redirect approximately 2.5% of property tax revenue to - transportation uses. This would provide an additional $25,000,000 per year in local matching funds to supplement state funds. Stan's report included three alternatives by which this Authority could be created: C o The Commission could request a special countywide election, present it to the Board of Supervisors on August 5 or 6, and once approved place it on the November 1986 Ballot. If the election were successful, special legislation `J could be sought to create the new freeway authority. -o The authority could be created pursuant to current law providing for the formation of Bridge and Highway Districts, which would require hearings before the Board of Supervisors and the Local Agency Formation Commission. The matter could then be presented to voters in 1987. o An advisory election could be held in Novermber 1986, followed by negotiations and hearings before the Board of Supervisors and the Local Agency Formation Commission, with a second election in 1987. Commissioner Roosevelt was unable to attend the Commission meeting due to a schedule conflict, therefore he expressed his concerns in a letter to me. Although he is concerned regarding the length of time required for the necessary hearings to create the freeway authority, Mr. Roosevelt recognizes the importance of citizen participation. TheCelOre, he recommended that staff be directed to begin the process for forming the Orange County Freeway Authority, through the Local Agency Formation_ Commission process. The Commission agreed and so ordered staff. As the first step in this process, please :^_isider this letter as a request for the Orange County Board of Supervisors to initiate the action necessary to call a special election pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 27060 in order to form the Orange County Freeway Authority. CamI ThoMa rs: _�Jamea doom•Clanc!A.31dmer•Ralen 9.Clark•RIMar09.5O9ar•TnOmaa F Riley•James Roosevelt•Harnert M.-vied •pona,o C.'Ndrson 1055 North Main. Scare 516. Serve Ana, California 92701 (714)804•7581 Ralph B. Clark August 11, 1986 Page Two Enclosed is pertinent information compiled by the Commission's legal counsel, Clay Parker. Should additional information be required, Commission staff will be happy to provide it upon request. I look forward to trying to solve some of our transportation problems without - raising local taxes. Sincerely, ,.trn;• Harriett Wieder ,Chairman •.,,'i., .�,.: !.c . fad . .....:: •L 1'. '1:::i�iM�a �:MKo� - `F . .. ' . Enclosure.. ...i� •;tr `' cc: Supervisor Nestande ... Supervisor Riley Supervisor Stanton • . ATTACHMENT B _ caRTESE-KNGX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985 �C SPECIAL DISTRICT FORMATION PROCEDURE DIAGRAM ' COMMISSION P90CF101NGS YaY be ind1 nd ay • nscau : , Italian. • flno of avpliotion by aRec¢d Pt�ond.e with rewind eigna n"t of land• lorJl 1penaY. awned or reghtend Youra. fSaetlag Sda001 - ISaetion r rogn Avolfntion far Prudent ApPlloum to LAFCO in form ianuind by Condemned td induct,maludon or •'t. •g peaam,mep and daaoioaan•applicabp . . tare,nmplianea with CEILL meetion 56654 C."ifinn If Filing Datennination at camweradeai or inwmaln> rare within 00 days by Elecutivt Office: Commanded hearing wim. 90 days of«mfi- eta. (Section 5mul - C Netter of C.mrl"Q.Naerina Notice given by Extent., Ofhtar by mailing, pubtinaon,nd Compaq. (Samant 56834.56205) Annlir i,n Rrview Rewea for Information from near I...tin or shamed counties: Eatcutive Officer ormaat noon red reeam• mendadon an PnPoal:"part traded a Isar 5 days prior In hearing. ' (Slctian 568301 caramel'.,N...I,, At the hearing the Camm=an wet amide"mH noon Ind factor retired to Praaaal, tom-au , of affected agneia and oa"lea,+Irvin eren.CEOA documentation. Make d irmonnaiond ,a.id by low. ISnomm.56375.55a5ZI �'e -207- C.mm:��nn n..�..i•••••d - Cemmmien Aevrvva Provevl - It awed,no umdu prvpoal may he mach May oa soprovtd wild mans or gamil. within am vest, one: Cammistion dNgnates tanduninp ISawan 555551 suanarity tar lusher pedcevdtnpp sopravn wittin ane you it not statuette; `a.d Commotion resolution mailed to conduct. . Ing authony. - (Section SGBSZ55£531 CONDUCTING AUTHORITY PROCEEDINGS - - .. Spinal climiCt fametion praCndinga conducted n at for1H'In the printiW aw of me distrin to he farmed,unless a pact of a reorganization Wp57007I.Pr adippsm"m9uimpualisnuring - and dactian. . . - C COMPLETION OF PROCEEDINGS The conducting authority clerk that] tand w the Cammiction office a urtified copy of the conducting authority molation and San tees (Station 54SOMThs ExmSn Officer shelf datermirn coed- Pit.= with ane Commission molation, It in compliance a cartifi• un of comphtion is issued and rudedad wigs County Retarder.If no amar a lutivs rim is named,the racerding doss is:dottier din. Executive ONiaar issues anomie at boundary usage and rings to Stu@ Baud of Egudindan,County Assessors and Auditor.San• mint sent to Soa guy a1 San far dry ongoing..(Sittig.57200) All ciotiam M.nnn tits C+litamis Gavernmmt Cade -208- 4 •:a � CORTESE-KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT PROCEDURE GUIDE The procedures listed below follow those required by State law, Government Code Sections 55000, et seq., and include several steps required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Revenue and Taxation Code (Sections 99 and 99.1 ). Several steps are included here that are not regbired by law but are recommended (indicated by asterisk). Please consult the appropriate code sections and LAFCO office. Application Procedures for Initiation of Commission Proceedings 1. Proponent reviews proposal with the LAFCO Officer.* 2. Proponent prepares application material fdr proposal. If the proponent is to be the lead agency for CEQA, an environmental review is conducted and one of the following .determinations is made: A. The project is exempt and a Notice of Exemption is prepared. B. The initial study is completed and a Negative Declaration filed. . Consult with the Executive Officer in the process. C. The initial study is completed and the EIR is prepared. CConsult with the Executive Officer in the process. - Commission Proceedings for Changes of Organization or Reorganization 3. Proponent prepares and adopts a resolution of application by the affected agency, or if by petition, circulates the proper petition for the required signatures. Proper petitions must include: A. A statement that the proposal is made pursuant to this part. B. The nature of the proposal and a list of all proposed changes of organization. C. A map and description of the boundaries of the affected territory. D. Any proposed terms and conditions. E. The reason for the proposal . -209- F. An indication of whether it is signed by registered voters or owners of land. G. Designation of three chief petitioners and their addresses. H. A statement as to whether or not the proposal is consistent with the affected city or district sphere of influence. I. A request that proceedings be taken pursuant to this part. The resolution of application must contain the same information as the petition, except for signatures. (Sections 56800, 56700, 56753) 4. Proponent delivers to the Executive Officer a complete application, including the application questionnaire, resolution or petition, environmental document (CEQA)„• map and description of affected area, applicable fees, agency service plan, or any other information required by the Commission. (Section 56652) S. The Executive Officer detemines if: A. The petition is sufficient as required by law and issues a determination on its sufficiency within 10 days of petition submittal , if the proposal is by petition. B. LAFCO is to be the lead agency. If it is, the environmental review in No. 2 must be followed. �• C. Master property tax agreements are applicable or if separate property tax exchange resolutions are needed. If an incorporation or formation is proposed, notice is sent to the County Assessor and Auditor for proposed tax information. Refer to Revenue and Taxation Cade Sections 99 and 99.1. (Section 56706) 6. The Executive Officer reviews the proposal and within 30 days of receipt either: A. Determines that the application is complete and that all property tax agreements are on file and issues a certificate of filing, setting the Commission hearing within 90 days. S. Determines that the application is not complete and notifies the proponent. (Section 56828) 7. The Executive Officer requests review of any information for the proposal from affected county departments, affected -210- agencies, and other affected counties' LAFCOs. (Section 56378) C S. Proponents and/or LAFCO provide for a meeting with affected residents or landowners to give information and receive comments on the proposal.' 9. The Executive Officer, at least 15 days prior to the date set for hearing, gives notice by: A. Publication in a newspaper of general circulation. a. Posting near the door of the hearing room. C Mailing to each affected agency which contains territory or whose sphere of influence contains territory within the proposal , chief petitioner, persons requesting notice, each city within three miles, and the county in the case of Incorporation or formation. Note Some Commission actions can be made without notice and hearing, such as annexations and detachments with written consent of all landowners. Notice and opportunity to request a public hearing must be given to agencies whose boundaries are affected. (Section 56634, 56835) 10. The Executive Officer reviews the application and any comments received and prepares the written report and recommendation. The report reviews pertinent factors and policies, spheres of Cinfluence, and general and specific plans. 11. The Executive Officer mails the report at least five days prior �..d to the hearing to each Commissioner, each person names in the application to receive a report, each affected local agency requesting a report, each agency whose boundaries or sphere of influence will be changed, and the Executive Officer of any other affected county. (Section 56833). 12. The Commission hears the proposal on the noticed date and time. The hearing may be continued for up to 70 days. . The Commission must consider a number of factors and policies in compliance with State law. Actions to be taken include: A. Approve or deny with or without conditions or revisions to the proposal. If denied,. no new proposal can be made for one year. B. Determine the exchange of property tax for an incorporation or formation. C. Determine if the territory is inhabited or uninhabited. -211- 0. Designate the conducting authority. E. Assign a short=term designation. CF. Authorize proceedings without notice, hearing, or an election, if there is 100: consent. (Sections 56375, 56852) 13. The Executive Officer sends the Commission resolution by certified mail to the chief petitioners, each agency whose boundaries will be changed, and to the conducting authority. (Section 56853) - • Conducting Authority Proceedings for Changes of Organization or Reorganization 14. The clerk of the conducting authority s.4ts the proposal for • hearing within 36 days of the Commission's resolution "date and gives notice. If authorized by the Commission, the conducting, authority may approve the proposal without notice and hearing. Notice must be given by the clerk at least 15 days prior to the hearing, and shall be: A. Published in a newspaper of general circulation. B. Posted near the hearing room door. C. Mailed to each affected agency which contains territory or whose sphere of influence contains territory within the Cproposal , the Executive Officer, chief petitioners, and persons requesting notice. (Sections 57002, 57025, 57026) 15. The conducting authority hears the proposal at the noticed time and date. The hearing may be continued for up to 60 days. Any written protests must be filed prior to the time of hearing with the clerk and must be signed, have the signature date, and address or location of the property. The value of written protests must be determined. (Section 57050) 16. The conducting authority shall adopt a resolution doing one of the following: A. Ordering the change if the area is uninhabited and if no majority land value protest is received; or if it is inhabited andless than 25% voter or landowner protest is received. B. Ordering the change subject to an election if the land is inhabited and 25% to 50< of the - registered voters or landowners protest. A resolution calling for an election on the question is adopted and forwarded to the Elections Clerk and Executive Officer. -212- If the conducting authority has called for an election, the - Executive Officer shall prepare an impartial analysis on the question for Commission approval. If it is approved by r the voters, a resolution ordering the chsange is adopted; if it is denied, a resolution ordering the change to be terminated is adopted. C. Terminating proceedings if a written protest is received from landowners having a majority of the land value in uninhabited territory, or from registered voters in Inhabited territory. A city detachment or district annexation may be terminated by the conducting authority. If a proposal is terminated, a new proposal must wait one year. (Section 57075, 57100) Conducting authority proceedings and resolutions for changes of organization other than annexations and detachments may vary from the procedures described above. The applicable sections of law for the conducting authority should be consulted. Comoletion and Effective Date of Change of Organization or Reorganization 17. The Clerk of the conducting authority shall file a certified copy of the conducting authority resolution approving, denying, or calling for an election with the Executive Officer. If the proposal is approved, the Clerk must also submit fees for the State Board of Equalization with LAFCO, along with any evidence necessary for assuring compliance with the Commission �..' resolution. (Sections 57200, 54902.5) 18. The Executive Officer determines compliance of the conducting authority resolution with the Commission resolution. If it is in compliance, the Executive Officer issues a certificate of completion which completes the proceedings. If it is not in compliance, the conducting authority and applicant are notified of noncompliance. The certificate is recorded with the County Recorder. If no effective date is specified in the Commission resolution, the recordation date is the effective date. A statement of boundary change or creation is issued by the Executive Officer and filed with the appropriate fees with the State Board of Equalization, County Auditor and County Assessor. If it is a - city change, a notice is given to the Secretary of State. Property tax resolutions, if any, are fgrvarded to County Auditor for property tax transfer. (Section 57200) 19. The Executive Officer gives the notice of completion and effective date to the conducting authority, agencies whose boundaries are affected, affected county departments, and proponear . -213- L 20. The affected agencies recognize completion of the Jurisdictional - change: property and sales tax transfers, police and fire protection responsibilities, planning and inspection controls, etc a. c u -214- ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION January 22, 1987 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Mr. Sylvester- The Orange County Transportation Commission, in a recent discussion of the proposed Orange County Freeway Authority, directed that Commission staff seek comment and possible revisions to the enclosed Scope of Work for an economic study of the Freeway Authority financing plan. Because of your interest in transportation and your interest in this unique financing approach, I am forwarding the latest Freeway Authority material to you and seeking your advice and comment on the proposaL The. Freeway Authority is patterned roughly on the tax increment financing method used by City redevelopment agencies. It would capture a share of future �,.✓ property tax revenues and target the captured revenues for freeway improve- ments. In Orange County. More complete discussions of the proposal are contained in the enclosed staff report and the Scope of Work that accompanies it. The freeway authority idea has already spawned a great deal of discussion and controversy. In this package is a letter from Supervisor Bruce Nestande, who has offered a number of alternatives to the freeway authority approach, plus a critique of the proposal adopted by the Orange County City Managers Associa- tion. The proposal for an economic study is designed to help address many of these issues. The Orange County Transportation Commission, mindful of the need to improve the transportation system in Orange County, is exploring the potential of the Freeway Authority and a type of tax increment financing as a way to ease the ever-increasing congestion on the County's freeway system. After long and careful study, the Commission is convinced that the only way Orange County's freeways will be improved is with significant local effort. `.a 1055 North Main, Suite 516, Santa Ana, California 92701 (714) 834-7581 Freeway Authority Page Two The Commission has been successful in securing State and Federal transportation dollars, but these resources — estimated at $500 million in the next five years — will not be enough to add needed lanes to existing facilities or to rebuild, repair, or widen local streets and roads. The Freeway Authority Is one way to begin addressing our transportation problems by creating a significant source of local transportation dollars without raising local taxes. The Commission welcomes your comments on this proposal and the proposed Scope of Work for an economic study on the costs and benefits of such an effort. Sincerely, Stan Oftelie Executive Director SOss Enclosures Item 16. ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION December 30, 1986 TO: Members of the Commission FROM Stan Oftelie, Executive Director SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority In November, the Commission directed staff to prepare a Request for Proposal and Scope of Work for an economic study on the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed Orange County Freeway Authority. In late November, the Orange County City Managers Association released a White Paper Analysis of the freeway authority concept. This report provides background information on the status of local funding options, plus a draft of a proposed Cost-Benefit Evaluation that could be conducted by a private consultant. BACKGROUND *In remarks closing his service as the 1985-86 Chairman of the Commission, Commissioner James Roosevelt proposed a plan to use the increment of growth in property tax revenue as a source of funds to help expand existing freeways. The centerpiece in Commissioner Roosevelt's idea is the formation of a new Orange County Freeway Authority to finance improvements through the existing State Transportation Improvement Program process. The new authority, if created by a popular vote in Orange County, would place a share of existing property tax dollars into construction on existing freeways. Revenue from the freeway authority would not be used to construct new freeways. Over the past 10 years, Orange County has averaged about $25 million in state highway expenditures. To match the state contribution, and to raise an additional $25 million dollars a year, would require the new Orange County Freeway Authority to collect about 2.5 percent of existing property tax revenues. In summarizing his proposal, which Commissioner Roosevelt said grew from his discussions on the feasibility of a State Constitutional Amendment for a larger share of existing state taxes, he said: "The idea is simple and clear we can take our destiny into our hands by using a share of the growth in property tax revenues to build new lanes on our existing freeways." DISCUSSION As discussed with the city managers, there are essentially three options available to the Orange County transportation Commission (OCTC) in dealing with Orange County's traffic problems: 1. Attempt to cope by using existing resources more effectively; 2. Redistribute existing revenues; 3. Create new revenues by raising taxes or increasing fees. 1055 North Main, Suite 316, Santa Ana, California 92701 (714) 834-7581 TO:. Members of the Commission Page 2 •?, FROM: Stan Oftelie, Executive Director SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority Each of these options needs to be discussed in some detail, for each offers a reasonable approach for dealing with transportation problems. DO BETTER WITH THE RESOURCES AVAILABLE In the aftermath of Proposition A, the unsuccessful 1984 effort to increase the sales tax by one percent, the Commission directed that more efforts be made to do better with existing resources. A series of actions have been taken by the Commission which focus directly on this theme. 1. Significant increases in state and federal dollars will be coming into Orange County in the next five years. While less than $100 million was spent in Orange County over the past five years, more than $500 million is programmed for expenditure on county freeways in the next five years The most recent example of this effort to secure more state and federal revenue was the commitment by Caltrans and Governor --- -- Deukmejian to fully fund the southerly sections of the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) widening. This commitment will more than �1 double the amount of money programmed (from $58 million to $118 million) for the section of the Santa Ana Freeway between I-405 (the San Diego Freeway) and State Route 55 (the Costa Mesa Freeway). Final action on this increased commitment is anticipated by the California Transportation Commission this Spring. 2. The Orange County Unified Transportation Trust was created to use interest earnings on transit reserves to pay for improvements to city and county streets and roads as well as projects on the state highway system Through this redistribution, more than S13 million is being made available for local streets and roads, while about $1 million will be spent on improvements on Pacific Coast Highway, and another $4 million is earmarked for Beach Boulevard. In the next two years another $8 million will be targeted for freeway and highway projects. 3. The Route 55 carpool lane is an attempt to increase the carrying cap"ity of an existing freeway (through restriping) while creating an _ incentive for carpools and vanpools. Caltrans recently reported that the carpool lane has increased the people carrying capacity of the freeway substantially and now has the second highest number of people per vehicle of any California freeway. The idea of restriping an existing freeway to get better capacity out of the existing system is being pursued on State Route 57, where the Commission is studying the impacts of restriping and looking at ways to finance a restriping. TO:. Members of the Commission Page 3 FROM: Stan Oftelie, Executive Director SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority 4. The Beach Boulevard Super Street project is designed to use low-cost transportation system management techniques, such as bus turnouts, removal of on street parking, signal synchronization and spot widenings on a street that cuts through nine different communities. Each community is playing a role in creating the Super Street while Caltrans and the Transportation Commission are financing the major costs involved in creating the county's first multijurisdictional Super Street. 5. A Transportation Partnership Awards breakfast, to honor private firms- and businesses active in carpooling, flexible work hours, and other efforts to flatten peak hour demand on streets, roads and freeways is now beginning its third year. A companion to the partnership awards is the Orange County Transit District (OCTD) program called Commuter Network. This successful effort to increase carpooling through energetic promotion and matching individuals is emerging as a statewide model for increasing carpooling. REDISTRIBUTE EXISTING REVENUES Efforts to use existing resources better, while promising, still leave the county's transportation �..d needs significantly underfunded. To address this problem, Commissioner Roosevelt requested the Commission to look into the possibility of a statewide initiative designed to capture the sales tax on gasoline and to use these revenues for streets, roads, and highway purposes. This proposal received significant support in Orange County, but was not well received in Sacramento. Specifically, state officials said the sales tax on gasoline was placed in the state General Fund and an equivalent amount was then allocated for public transit. In essence, the sales tax on gasoline is roughly equal to the one-quarter percent of the sales tax earmarked for public transit. Efforts to change the distribution method brought immediate threats of reprisals from Bay Area legislators who do not want to tamper with the current formula. Although re- distribution of state revenues is not being pursued by the Transportation Commission at this time, Assemblyman Gil Ferguson of Newport Beach is exploring a statewide initiative designed to accomplish a redistribution of state revenues to benefit the highway system. Any bill designed to redirect state General Fund resources away from existing projects will face a buzzsaw of opposition in Sacramento and will probably have serious problems if it is qualified for the statewide ballot throuni. the petition process. The freeway authority concept looks at redistribution of property taxes, but only for Orange County and Orange County government agencies. TO: Members of the Commission Page 4 FROM: Stan Oftelie, Executive Director SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority �✓ At the urging off the League of Cities and the City Managers Association, the concept of the freeway authority has not been developed far beyond the original ideas embodied in the July 24 staff report to the Commission. However, as part of the Commission's ongoing forum process for public outreach, the Laguna Hills-based firm Research Network conducted a far- ranging look at the transportation attitudes of Orange County residents. In its questioning about the concept of the freeway authority, the Research Network found: Substantially more than half (59%) of all Orange County respondents preferred the method of funding involving redistributing tax resources available, while a little more than four out of ten (41%) said a new tax should be instituted. However, when probed by the interviewer to determine if the supporters would favor such a redistribution if it reduced police, fire, and education services, the survey found "support for redistributing funds evaporates from 59 percent to 15 percent, or one in seven, if the redistribution reduces other service levels.' At the Forum Advisory Committee, this follow-up question was challenged by citizens who said the reduction in property tax dollars did not have to come from police, fire, or education, but could be made up by trimming "non-essential services like subsidies to chambers of commerce or aerobics classes put on by Parks and Recreation." If the freeway authority concept were placed on the ballot, it would be debated by local government leaders who would claim the redistribution would hurt essential services and proponents of the measure who would claim the proposal would help take the fat out of government. To avoid this type of squabble, the Commission authorized staff to work with a private consultant to develop a scope of work for an economic study looking at the pros and cons of a freeway authority. The scope of work, plus a request for proposal on this study, is before the Commission today. The proposed work program (Attachment A) developed for the Commission by Arthur Young and Company, outlines a $35,000 study to look at the financial advantages and disadvantages of the the freeway authority concept. The study would also examine the overall and specific benefits of freeway improvement in Orange County. Because the freeway authority concept has triggered discussion and opposition among many local government agencies, staff recommends that this proposed economic study be thoroughly discussed before it is distributed to the consultant community. By adding constructive comments from the City Managers Association and other interested agencies and individuals, a study plan can be crafted which answers many of the major questions facing a significant reordering of local spending priorities. The effort to look at the costs and benefits of the freeway authority can be enhanced by the careful evaluation of the City Managers Association. The managers'White Paper (Attachment B), which fairly lays out the managers' philosophical dislike for any efforts to reduce municipal financing, raises reasonable issues involving TO:. Members of the Commission Page 5 FROM: Stan Oftelie, Executive Director SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority implementation and the Gann consequences of the proposed freeway authority. It does not advance the concept any further, however, nor does it attempt to look at any modifications or adjustments to the proposals. The White Paper does not offer any specific solutions or suggestions, but proposes that the managers work with the Transportation Commission to develop a more workable alternative. The request for proposal and scope of work, as well as the eventual study itself, should be part of the on-going discussion of the viability of this approval. Very little has been learned about the freeway authority; today it can only be accepted or rejected on philosophical grounds. Reliable data is needed before the concept is fully evaluated. The city managers have not provided any new data to the discussion of redistribution. NEW TAXES OR INCREASED FEES The Commission has been involved with two major fee programs in the past three years. 1. The Commission served as a catalyst for bringing the county and nine cities together to form the Foothill and Eastern Transportation Corridor Agencies Board and the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency ' Board, as well as funding a Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program which was acceptable to both the cities and the county. This program will generate $400 million in developer fees to help build three south and east Orange County freeways. 2. A Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE) has been formed to " build a network of freeway eallboxes on county freeways. The SAFE program is financed by a $1 fee added to each vehicle registration in Orange County and will generate about $1.6 million a year. The first freeway eallboxes should appear on Orange County freeways in mid-1987. Additionally, a number of other options for raising taxes or fees to finance transportation improvements can be pursued. In a letter forwarded to every government agency and every city council member (Attachment C), Supervisor Bruce Nestande suggested exploring these revenue enhancements which could possibly become a local ballot measure: o A local option gas tax. o An increase in the state gas tax. o A fee paid by employers based on the number of employees. o A fee paid by employers based on the number of parking spaces provided for employees. o Redirect existing property tax revenues (such as OCTC proposal). TO: Members of the Commission Page 6 FROM: Stan Oftelie, Executive Director SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority o A one-quarter percent sales tax devoted to arterial highway financing, including "Super Streets", which would raise more than $40 million a year. This, at least, would give arterial highways the same level of sales tax financing that OCTD receives and OCTD's.bus routes would benefit from improved arterial highways. o A one-half percent sales tax, or more than $80 million annually, split equally between the cities for street repairs and improvements and the Commission for freeway and highway improvements. a The same as above but limited to a ten-year crash program to reduce traffic congestion, after which the tax would expire. o Expand the current city/county developer fee program to reduce traffic congestion, after which the tax would expire. o Any combination of the above. Currently, the Commission is not pursuing any general tax increase proposals, nor is there any serious examination of increased fees. A study of financing opportunities along the northern stretches of the Santa Ana Freeway will inventory some specific financing opportunities in Orange, Anaheim, and Buena Park, but the results of this study will not be available until mid-1987. As part of the work done by Research Network, Orange County residents were questioned about their initial reaction to some kind of revenue increase. The survey found about 40 percent of the respondents amenable to some sort of increase, although the amount, duration, and conditions surrounding such an increase were not discussed nor probed. The small working groups at the north Orange County. Forum were queried about a possible revenue increase and, after a morning's worth of education, were favorably disposed towards such an increase. The participants in the small groups, however, were split over the type of increase -- with significant support for gas taxes and significant support for sales taxes. A significant segment of the people present opposed any revenue increase and counseled for an even greater effort in obtaining more state, federal, and existing tax revenues. The Commission's efforts in obtaining voter approval of any revenue increase is impacted by the lack of enabling legislation which would allow a local option tax measure. The legislation which allowed the Commission to bring Proposition A of 1984 to the ballot expired one year ago. The Commission would have to seek new legislation if a new revenue measure of any kind is to be placed on the ballot in the future. Statewide, there is interest in allowing counties a generic grant of authority to hold local option sales tax elections. Spurred by successful one-half percent sales tax elections in Alameda, Fresno, and Santa Clara Counties, and undeterred by the sales tax losses in Orange, Contra Costa, and Tuolomme Counties, the concept of financing transportation improvements with a local sales tax measure approved by local voters is once again gaining momentum in �..� the State Legislature. TO:. Members of the Commission Page 7 FROM Stan O£telie, Executive Director SUBJECT: Orange County Freeway Authority _ A number of areas, including Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, are looking at the potential of 1987 or 1988 ballot measures, if such generic legislation is passed early in the 1987 Legislative Session. Using specific authorization, similar to the legislation Orange County used for the 1984 Proposition A election, San Diego County may bring a measure to the ballot in mid-1987. Finally, the possibility of toll financing for the Foothill, Eastern, and San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridors remains an option. Although a preliminary study by Gruen and Associates indicates that toll financing alone will not pay for new freeway construction, tolls may be a part of a successful mix of funding for the Eastern and possibly the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridors. The new Transportation Corridor Agencies will be studying tolls as a financing mechanism in the months ahead. SUMMARY No single solution will meet Orange County's transportation needs and no single financing source will provide a magic curative to the county's transportation financing ills. Since June of 1984, the Commission has pursued a number of new and innovative ways of financing transportation improvements without raising general taxes. The proposed freeway authority, which redistributes existing property taxes, is in keeping with this approach. However, both Supervisor Nestande and the Orange County City Managers Association have suggested that the Commission begin to consider raising taxes or fees as a way to deal with increasing transportation problems. Supervisor Nestande calls these options revenue enhancements and the city managers say "we believe that the problems of growth in this county must be addressed by growth revenues. By "growth revenues" we are referring to an _ additional assessment on an existing tax (e.g., raising the tax on gasoline, adjusting the valuation on motor vehicles, etc.) or the creation of a totally new tax or assessment. It is not possible, nor is it prudent, to attempt to solve these problems by redistributing existing revenues." These comments, however, fall short of identifying specific taxes that should be looked at to address our transportation needs. Both the City Managers Association and Supervisor Nestande have offered to work with the Commission to develop a financing and expenditure package if the Commission takes this approach. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Direct staff to circulate the proposed Orange County Freeway Authority Cost Benefit Evaluation to the City Managers Association, the County Administrative Office, and other interested groups and organizations, both public and private, for their comments and suggested alterations. B. Continue to monitor statewide efforts on local sales tax authorizations. C. Report back to the Orange County Transportation Commission in 60 days with the status report on the Orange County Freeway Authority concept. ATTACHMENT A THE PROPOSED ORANGE COUNTY FREEWAY AUTHORITY COST-BENEFTT EVALUATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND WORK PROGRAM WILL BE DISTRIBUTED PRIOR TO THE JANUARY 12, 1987 COMMISSION MEETING ATTACBMT B .r White Paper Orange County City Managers ' Association - Analysis of Orange County Freeway Authoritv The Provosa-I In July 1986, the Orange County- Transportation -Commission unanimously directed its staff to begin exploring a plan to use the annual tax increment from the property tax (now received by cities, the countyj schools, and special dis- tricts) as a source of funds to help improve existing free- ways. More explicitly; a new Orange County Freeway Authority would be formed which would be the recipient of $25 million annually from local taxing 'agencies.. Over the past ten years, Orange County has averaged about $25 million per year in state ' highway expenditures. These newly-raised monies would be used to match state aid to help finance improvements to the freeway system — such as the 5 , 55, 57 , 91 , 22 , and any othe.rs. Depending on how you look at it, the proposal would require the commitment of 2.5% of all property tax revenues now received by local agencies; cr, it would require the commit- ment of about 25% of the property tax increment . This point was not sufficiently clarified in the original communication from OCTC. At first, OCTC was pushing for an advisory vote of the electorate at the November 41 1986 election. They have since decelerated the process and are now aiming for a November 1987 or June .1988 election. They are also actively seeking the input of cities . Analvs+s The Orange County City Managers ' Association has spent con- siderable time reviewing and analyzing this proposal . It also appointed a special committee of managers to meet with the. Executive Director of OCTC to explore the matter more deeply and prepare a response . It is our considered opinion that this proposal is' an inappropriate approach to addressing the problems of financ- ing improvements to the existing freeways for the following reasons: _ . Property tax revenues are traditional local govern- ment revenue sources necessary to fund critical public safety needs as well as other city services . Cities should not endorse this inroad on such a critical revenue source . -The annual tax increment which is derived from the growth in property tax revenues is used by cities ..✓ to maintain their current level of services...-- This growth helps pay for the inflationary increases in the price of goods and services that cities con- sume. Additionally, some special districts in the County have issued bonds to finance needed capital improvements and pledged their property tax incre- ment to help fund the annual debt service. They are ill-positioned to commit any more increment.; City budgets have been heavily impacted by recent federal and state and marketplace activities. our revenues are stretched thin to provide the services requested by our citizens . Cities must adjust to the loss of general revenue sharing beginning October 1, 1986; deal with the cutbacks in Community Development Block Grant funding; respond to the federal mandate to provide COBRA benefits to departed employees; fund the cost of medicare coverage for newly-hired employees; and deal with = the decreased attractiveness of some municipal bonds as a result of the tax reform legislation. Our peculiar problems -of-higher—liability-insurance costs and our own deferred maintenance of streets and highways must also be addressed. �✓ Streets and highways costs have traditionally been funded by "user taxes ." This methodology should be . pursued more actively. It should also be pointed out that cities substantially augment gas tax funds with general revenues to fund streets and roads within their jurisdiction. Local governments spent $146 million in FY 1983-84: state gas tax subven tions (31 .8%) , local general funds (28 .78) , federal funds (10 . 08) , other local (23 .38) , and other taxes (6.38) . Further, a 1984 assessment concluded that, . 028% of all streets and roads require major rebuilding at an estimated cost of 8205 million, " plus $38 million to maintain the streets satis- factorily. While a 13-year repair and maintenance cycle is considered desirable , local governments w- maintaining streets on a 66-year cycle . There are major , unmet needs at the local level which require funding . A commitment by each jurisdiction, ,.-to , prefund an established amount severely reduces the flexibility of future city councils to address critical , local .. needs . This is a vital home rule issue . No consideration has been given to the effect on . the Gann Appropriation Limitation of cities . It is clear that when property taxes are transferred to another entity, the appropriation limit of the jurisdiction must be transferred as well . This matter gains added significance in light of the fact that the State is very close to exceeding its Gann limit. The Constitution would permit the State to transfer its Gann surplus to local agencies under the other agencies limitations . If cities gave away a portion of their appropriation limit, they might lose out on state funds. The impact on the cities varies considerably; and there has been no attempt by OCTC to correlate the benefits that would be derived with the costs that are levied . Countywide, it is estimated that 2.52% of the property tax increment would be utilized in 1986-87 , and this amount declines to 1.84; by 1989- 90 . However, if you live in a developing city, the actual percentage would decline to a greater extent than indicated. If you live in a 'built-out city, the percentage extracted is higher than the average - indicated. As such, the nondeveloping city pays a higher amount on a per capita basis over time. It should also be noted that neither LAFCO nor the County Board of Supervisors can unilaterally extract a portion of the annual tax increment from cities . Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99 provides that any reallocation of property tax revenues must be agreed upon by the affected agencies . Further , in the event resolutions agreeing to the exchange of property tax revenues are not forthcoming , all proceedings of the jurisdictional change shall automatically be terminated by LAFCO (see attached legal opinion from Rutan 8 Tucker) . Most importantly, we believe that the problems of growth in this county must he addressed by growth revenues . By "growth revenues" we are referring to an additional assess- ment on an existing tax (e .g . , raising the tax on gasoline, adjusting the valuation on motor vehicles , etc. ) or the creation of a totally new tax or assessment . It is not possible , nor is it prudent, to attempt to solve these problems by redistributing existing revenues . What appears to be a "no pain" solution from OCTC 's perspective is , in fact, a heavy burden for cities to bear . The existing revenue'• sources utilized by cities are. barely adequate to meet our growing needs . .. We also believe OCTC 's approach is doomed to failure . Approximately 50% of property tax revenues are received by the schools. Due to the complexities of school financing, the state is required to make up the difference between the amount received from property taxes and the amount due through the Average Daily Attendance formula from the state coffers. Thus , any decrease in local property tax revenues _. to schools would be financed by the state. It is not reason- able to assume that the state would tolerate a $12-1/2 million raid on its funds through this "back door" approach without retaliating in some fashion. It would not be difficult for them to devise a means to withhold other money that would normally be due OCTC, or, at a minimum, refuse to consider any matching of the $25 million raised locally. The Process -- A variety of studies has found that transportation and housing are perceived as the major problems in Orange County. The Orange County Needs Assessment determined transportation was the number one problem: increasing traffic congestion (especially on freeways) , age and quality of the freeways , the level of maintenance of streets and roads, and the adequacy of public transportation for lower income people and people with special needs. The Orange County Annual Survey shows that residents perceive that traffic congestion has become a great problem. Those surveyed opt for the widening of existing freeways over .J improving public transportation or building new freeways . However , county residents ' interest in resolving transpor- tation and social problems stop at their pocketbook . . Ironically, they recognize the need for funding , but they do not want to pay for it themselves. Cities are cognizant of these findings and share the concern. We are willing to work with OCTC to help evaluate alternative modes of addressing these needs and the inadequacy of exist- ing revenues . We feel that these have not been explored completely; and that there are viable alternatives to the one that was devised by OCTC. We wish to make a final comment on process. The initial proposal to form an Orange County Freeway Authority was first broached to OCTC on July 14 , 1986 . Two weeks later , OCTC voted to pursue the formation of the special district; and on August llth, the Chairman of th Commission asked the Chair- man of the Board of Supervisors to initiate action to call a _special election for November 1986 . All this took place without the benefit of input from those most severely affec- ted — cities , schools , and special districts. We -, deplore this process . We remain willing to work with the Commission .. and any other entity in seeking solutions to identified, priority problems in the county. We believe the attached letter- from the president of the Orange County Division of the League of California Cities to the chairman of the Board - of Supervisors regarding another matter - expresses our feelings most eloquently. Conclusion The Orange County City Managers ' Association opposes the use of existing property tax revenues or the annual property tax increment to finance improvements to existing freeways. We believe that the problems of growth in this county must be addressed by growth revenues. It is not possible, nor is it prudent, to attempt to solve these problems by redistributing existing revenues. We agree 'with Supervisor Bruce Nestande 's approach that we should be methodical and deliberate even if it requires a little extra time. We also concur that optional funding mechanisms should be thoroughly analyzed prior to making_a decision on what ought to appear on the ballot. 'We remain willing to work with OCTC to devise a viable alternative. Recommendation We believe it is necessary to consolidate our efforts to devise a joint solution to the pressing transportation problems in Orange County. We recommend the formation of a research task force composed of City Managers, Finance Directors , and other interested parties to explore other options and alternatives with the OCTC staff. Attachments ATTACHMENT C S U P E R V I $ O R, THIRD OISTRI CT �\ B R U C E NESTAND �M`J VICE-CMAI R MAN 01 THE BOARD 01 SUPERVISORS ROSERT E.TMOMAS HA"OF ADMINISTRATION SS.• 10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA,SANTA ANA.GUPORNIA SE7OI-40E BR -1{I PHONES E -=O (AREA CODE 7141 J$ FILE Septeubw 16, 1986 - Honorable 'I'17G7 em F. Riley Orange County Board of Stapervisors 10 Civic Center Plan Santa Ana, CA 92701 .- Dear.ltm. . As you may know, the mange Carty Transportation Cannission (CC2C) has proposed creating a new tax.jur sdirtam to be known as the mange County Free,W Authority. Its purpose would be to redirect 2.5% of the existing property tax revenues now going to other jurisdictions, or about $25 million per year, to use in matching state and federal highway funding. = plans to petition the To al Agency Formation Commission and then the Board of Supervisors to place the proposal before the Voters at a special election in 1987. I believe this action is presently premature for four reasons. First, I believe we ought to thoroughly examine all the optional transportation revenue enhancements available; seed, we should determine what existing d, programs will suffer from this CYRC proposed revenue transfer; third, since = million countywide does very little, we ought not to aAATe== the transportation issue in a piec areal manner; and fourth, we can't keep going to the voters, so -let's take time to better assure that what goes on the ballot will be supported and resolve the crisis. . 'Without question, we critically need an infusion of dollars into our transportation network in mange County. We need money for maintenance, -rehabiilitation, widening and new construction. It's my contention that the rest transportation revenue enhancement mea=nre placed on the ballot ought to be a well thought-out community supported comprehensive traffic mitiga- tion and improvement plan. I believe we ought. to move with deliberation, but expeditiously, because the inflationary increase in the cost of highway projects mans delays are very costly, and ultimately fewer projects can be completed for a limited amount of revenue. the question becomes one of selecting the best method to insure a predict- able revenue stream which doesn't interfere with existing con mitents. It seems to me that we ought to explore various alternatives and analyze the pros and cons of each. ATe should project the revenue stream, specify how the money will be spent, the body to administer the program, and then begin to seek a camnmvty consensus on what should be proposed. We should learn from the defeat of Proposition A. One very clear ccnclu- �..✓ sion was that the issue was hastily put together, and a canmmity consensus was never secured prior to its appearance on the ballot. As a current member and former Chairman of the California Trap ptrtation C—issicn, I also have learned from the experience of others around the state that successful revenue measures to address transportation problems September 16, 1986 Page 2 depend on broad community input, support, and ccnsensys�naking. Unsuccess- ful initiatives are simply presented to voters, and often to many elected _ officials, in a heavy-handed tale-it-or-leave-it manner, and then they fail at the polls. Let's be methodical and deliberate in our approach even if it requires a little extra time. M can't afford another costly failure at the ballot box because we lose credibility and valuable time. As I said, time is very important because of the extraordinary y long lead time from =oept to construction with respect to road projects. _ .d Bbe next measure must pass, and it should be comprehensive because the issue is of crisis proportions now. Before we address the optional finan- cial finding alternatives, we should first do an honest prioritized needs assessment for a given time period accompanied by a cost analysis of that assessment. a -. Regarding the optional finding mechanisms, I Can think of a number of alternatives which ought to be thoroughly analyzed prior to a decision being made on what ought to appear on the ballot: o A local option gas tax. .. o An increase in the state gas tax. o A fee paid by employers based on the number of employees. o A fee paid by employers based on the number of parking spaces provided for employees. O Redirect existing property tax revenues (such as C= proposal) . o A one-quarter cent sales tax devoted to arterial highway financing, including -super streets", which would raise mire than $40 million a year. This, at least, would give arterial highways the same level of - sales tax financing that CCM receives, and OCID's bus routes would benefit from improved arterial highways. o A one-half cent sales tax, or more than 980 million annually, split equally between the cities for street repairs and improvements and O=C for freeway and highway impravemnnts. o The same as above but limited to a ten-year crash program to reduce traffic congestion, after which the tax would expire. o agwd the current city-county developer fee program to create a ..J comntywide. benefit assessment district for street and highway improve- ments. o Any combination of time above. _ . September 16, 1986 ' Page 3 o Finally, maybe we need to completely overhaul our transportation - delivesy system- 10 elaborate on the last paint, we already have an O=, an CCID, a County Road Departnent, two freeway corridor joint-powers authorities as w>-U as Caltrans and individual city public works departments. no we really need another transportation authority? Perhaps the transportation delivery _. process i.s cumibersme enough as it is without creating another level of bureaucracy. Sometimes it seems as though all our transportation fang is going for administrators, lawyers and planning consultants. Perhaps, . instead of a new-Freeway Authority piled on tap of all these other layers of transportation bureaucracy, we should seek legislation to ask voters to - streamline the process and reduce some of this administrative waste. The creation of an Orange County Tr, nsportation Authority, dining the resources of O=, 0®, the County and City Road Departments, and the two joint-powers authorities which would allow us to address more thoroughly our countywide transportation problems. This authority could have linkage with the 27 city and county land use planning agencies'ta insure our transportation plans are COM5 .stent with future development. In summary, there are any number of alternative ballot measures which could be presented to voters to raise revenue and reduce administrative overhead. I simply believe there should be more input and discussion among elected `.J and civic leaders before racing to the ballot box. I can think of no issue more important than transportation in relationship to the future of Orange County. Your concern and involveamt regarding this issue is critical and of great importance. Iet's all get iuwlved with our ideas and time. - Please let me know what you think. I will introduce this approach at the proper forum if there is sufficient interest in pursuing the more compre- hensive assessment of our transportation dilemma with the expectation of a future ballot measure. I look forward to a contimung dialogue on this most important subject. I'm hopeful that we can more successfully address this issue than currently is the case, and avoid the community unrest which grows as gridlock approaches. `7 ]3M= IgSPADIDE Vice-Chairman EN:tek `..J cc: County Adninistrative Officer Director, awir=rental Management Agency Emscutive Director, OC:C General Manager, O= ORANGE COUNTY FREEWAY AUTHORITY COST-BENEFIT EVALUATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND WORK PROGRAM - \� SUMMARY The Orange County Transportation Commission (OCTC) is seeking means to improve the freeways in the County and thereby achieve greater traffic movement and the benefits associated with mobility. A suggested method for obtaining additional funds for such improvements has been the creation of a County- wide special district with the authority to obtain a share of property taxes on a tax increment basis. The freeway authority would use these revenues to accelerate planned improvements to existing freeways in Orange County. In considering whether to proceed with the creation of a freeway authority, OCTC plans to retain a qualif.Led_.consuLtant to. evaluate the benefits and costs associated with using a portion of property tax revenues for freeway improvements. BACKGROUND As Orange County continues to grow, its traffic congestion problems increase. During 1983 and 1984 OCTC developed a 15-Year Transportation Investment Plan aimed at improving traffic in the County and achieving other transportation goals. The plan included a range of desired transportation improvements for the County to meet these purposes . The plan included new freeways, light rail and improvements to arterial highways as well as free- way widening and other projects involving existing freeways. The investment plan ' s projects would have been funded in part from a proposed one cent increase in sales tax . The ballot measure embodying the increase, however, was defeated in the June 1984 election. _ 1 _ Nonetheless, public opinion surveys show growing dissatis- faction with traffic and indicate that Orange County citizens want freeways to be improved. In the summer of 1985 outgoing . OCTC Chairman James Roosevelt proposed the creation of a County- wide special district that would have the authority to obtain a portion of property tax revenues. The freeway authority would be formed under a provision of the California Streets and Highways Code. The agency would have the authority to negotiate with other taxing entities in the County for a share of the property tax revenues attributable to any increases in assessed valuation. In this respect the authority would function similarly to a redevelopment agency. An underlying assumption is that the freeway improvements would increase property values, thereby generating additional property taxes. As a result, there would be no net loss to the other taxing agencies in the County. Officials of some taxing agencies have expressed concern that the freeway improvements would not generate sufficient increases in property values to offset losses in property tax revenues to their agencies. A related concern is that, while the improvements to be funded with the authority ' s revenues might enhance the value of property near affected freeways and inter- changes, other properties not located close to freeways would experience little or no increase in value as a result of the improvements. Some officials have also indicated that the increases in property values might lag the diversion of property taxes from their agencies to the authority for such a long period that the present value of the losses would exceed the mid-term increases in revenues. OCTC is interested in evaluating the economic benefits and costs associated with the use of property taxes to improve ..✓ freeways in Orange County. It seems clear that there is economic value associated with traffic mobility. Economists often cite 2 - the value of people ' s time and of goods in transit when describ- ing the benefits associated with transportation improvements. One might also expect there to be a positive relationship between �../ property values and traffic mobility. In deciding whether to pursue the creation of the freeway authority and, if so, how, OCTC needs to understand as nearly as possible: • The estimated economic benefits that would result from the freeway . improvements • How the benefits would be distributed geographi- cally and among taxing jurisdictions within the County • The estimated payback period, i .e. , how long it would take for the value of the improvements to offset the cost of property tax losses to taxing agencies . Over the past ten years Orange County has received an average of about $25 million per year for state highway improve ments through the State Transportation Improvement Program. OCTC has established an equivalent amount as the. assumedrevenues to be raised through property taxes for the freeway authority. A consultant has developed a spreadsheet showing the approximate losses to other taxing agencies in the County for each of five years if the freeway authority receives $25 million per year. The County has a total assessed valuation of about $100 billion which generates approximately $1 billion per year in property tax revenues. The consultant ' s calculations assume 11% annual increases in assessed valuation based on historical trends and * other assumptions. The freeway authority would need to receive about 2 to 2. 5% of the property taxes paid in the County to raise $25 million per year . The spreadsheet calculations show that losses in property tax revenues to other categories of taxing agencies in the County in FY 1987-88 would be as follows : 3 - School districts $13 .3 million County of Orange 4.1 million Cities 3.6 million Others 4.0 million Total 25 . 0 million The 15-Year Transportation Investment Plan included ten freeway improvement projects summarized below. If formed, the freeway authority would use its $25 million in revenues to accelerate these projects. Number of Escalated Planned Freeway Projects Costs Timeframe Santa Ana (I-5) 4 $1.4 billion FY 84-85 to FY 91-92 San Diego (I-405) 2 $80 million FY 85-86 to FY 87-88 . Costa Mesa �..i (Route .55) 1 $186 million FY 89-90 to FY 94-95 Orange (Route 57) 1 $145 million FY 91-92 to FY 94-95 Riverside (Route 91) 1 $157 million FY 94-95 to FY 98-99 Garden Grove (Route 22) 1 $181 million FY 95-96 to FY 98-99 The projects total more than $2.1 billion in costs. Since the development of the plan, the scope of the projects listed above and their costs have changed. OCTC will provide the consultant chosen for this study with more detailed and up-to- date information on the freeway improvement projects once the study begins. OCTC will also assist the consultant in projecting the impacts of the projects on traffic flow and capacity on the affected freeways . It is expected that the consultant and OCTC staff will jointly develop the list of specific projects which would be funded on a year-by-year basis with the $25 million. 4 - It is clear that direct use of the $25 million for right- of-way acquisition, design and construction would have little impact in accelerating the planned improvements. Rather , it is expected that the funds would be used to attract other revenues and as a means of servicing debt on long-term financing. PROJECT OBJECTIVES Ideally, the study would determine the value of freeway improvements that could. be made possible by adding $25 million to other revenues available . for projects, quantify the economic costs and benefits associated with the improvements both on a County-wide basis and by jurisdiction within the County, and determine the amount of time it would take for taxing agencies to recoup the property tax revenues they would initially lose if the authority were implemented. OCTC recognizes that it is not possible to make all of these findings with a high degree of certainty and has established the following objectives for the study: 1. Identify the theoretical bases for the relationship between improvements to existing freeways and economic benefits to the regions they serve. 2. Support the theoretical bases, if possible, with references to studies documenting the economic impacts of freeway improvements in other jurisdictions. 3. Identify the most cost-effective means of using $25 million a year to accelerate planned improvements to Orange County freeways ; this includes estimating .the total incremental value of improvements that could be made possible with long-term financing, using the additional $25 million for debt service. 4 . Estimate the overall economic costs and benefits to the county of using the $25 million per year in property tax revenues for freeway improvements in terms of: • Travel time for people and goods • Property values - 5 - • Other costs and benefits 5. In cooperation with OCTC staff, develop a prioritized list of freeway improvement projects to be funded with the property tax revenues and other funds attracted or secured by such revenues. 6. Provide a knowledgeable written discussion of how the improvements made possible with the the property tax revenues would affect groups of taxing agencies within the County, e.g. : • Cities with extensive access to and dependence on freeways • Cities with less access to and dependence on freeways • School districts • The County of Orange • Special districts and other taxing agencies. The discussion should address the factors influencing the payback period for such agencies for short- and mid-term losses in property tax revenues. 7. Recommend whether or not, based on economic impacts , the freeway authority should be formed. OCTC sincerely desires an objective analysis and report on the possible economic impacts of using $25 million per year in property taxes for freeway improvements . The consultant should plan to identify possible negative as well as positive impacts resulting from the diversion of the revenues from other agencies to the authority. WORK PROGRAM OCTC has developed the following outline work program for the study. Proposers are encouraged to add to and expand upon the tasks outlined below or to develop alternative tasks to achieve the project objectives . 6 - TASK 1 — CONDUCT LITERATURE SEARCH The consultant will identify, review and summarize written reports and data concerning the relationship between freeway improvements and impacts on the economy of the areas served by the freeways. As nearly as passible the literature search should concentrate on information relating to situations similar to Orange County' s. The consultant should identify both the theo- retical bases for the economic relationship between improvements on one hand and costs and benefits* on the other . The consultant should also seek information relating to the actual impact on property values, commerce, housing and other segments of the economy. Task 1 Work Product Technical memorandum presenting the results of the literature search. TASK 2 — ESTIMATE THE FINANCING CAPABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPERTY TAR REVENUES In this task the consultant will estimate the approximate incremental value of improvements that can be achieved as a result of obtaining $25 million per year in property tax revenues. In addition to determining the net construction fund proceeds associated with the debt service capacity provided by the property tax revenues, the consultant will .take into account any advantages the freeway authority might achieve in obtaining federal and state highway funds as a result of the $25 million per year in revenues . The emphasis on this task should be on establishing an approximate dollar figure to use as an assumption in determining the number and types of projects to be funded. Identifying and developing the most beneficial methods for financing freeway 7 - improvements is not the purpose of the study, but the consultant will be expected to use reasonable assumptions and estimate a �.,✓ range of amounts that could be available for construction. Task 2 Work Product Technical memorandum describing the results of Task 2. TASK 3 - DEVELOP A LIST OF POSSIBLE PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED The purpose of this task is to develop assumptions about how the financing capability associated with the authority' s property tax revenues would be used for freeway improvements and the impact of those improvements on traffic movement. Using the 15-Year Transportation Investment Plan as a starting point, the consultant, with assistance from OCTC staff, will develop a time- - sequenced list of projects to be funded, using the authority ' s financing capabilities as established in Task 2 to determine the dollar volume .of improvements to be made. Also with OCTC' s help, the consultant will estimate the impact on traffic flow in terms of vehicles and people per hour as a result of the improvements . The emphasis in this task will be on establishing assumed projects and their impacts on traffic flow rather than in devel- oping detailed project description's and estimates or highly accurate traffic impact analyses. Task 3 Work Product A technical memorandum containing list of projects, estimated costs and estimated traffic impact analyses . 8 - TASK 4 — IDENTIFY THE TYPES OF ECONOMIC BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECTS The consultant will identify the types of benefits that completing the improvement projects are likely to have on the economy of the areas served by the affected freeways . The consultant should identify a full range of benefits based on Task 1 findings. The consultant will also distinguish between those benefits that can reasonably be estimated in terms of dollars (e.g. , time savings by commuters) and those for which a theoretical basis can be identified, but for which it would be difficult or impossible to quantify benefits (e.g. property values) . In the technical memorandum the consultant will describe how each of the benefits will be taken into account in the following task. In short, the technical memorandum should _ describe the methodology for Task -5. Task 4 Work Product A technical memorandum identifyfag economic costs _ and benefits, the extent to which they can be quanitified _ and the consultant ' s proposed treatment of them in determining the impacts associated with the improvement projects. TASK 5 — ESTIMATE THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED FREEWAY AUTHORITY The purpose of this task is to quantify the economic benefits and costs that would result from using property tax revenues diverted from other taxing agencies to fund freeway .mprovements in Orange County. The consultant will, wherever possible, estimate the dollar value of economic benefits and costs. Where there is insufficient basis to do this , the consultant will provide a discussion of the types of casts and benefits and how they might apply to Orange County. It is not the intention of OCTC to show necessarily positive economic 9 benefits to the entire County or to any of its jurisdictions . OCTC desires to obtain an objective evaluation of the possible �...' impact of the authority. Accordingly, the consultant will be expected to critically review and analyze potential costs and benefits and report on how they might be expected to affect the county. Task 5 Work Product A technical memorandum describing the economic costs and benefits associated with the proposed freeway authority. TASK 6 - DESCRIBE HOW THE COSTS AND BENEFITS ARE LIKELY TO AFFECT VARIOUS TYPES OF JURISDICTIONS IN THE COUNTY To the extent possible the consultant will comment on how the economic costs and benefits associated with the authority are likely to affect major categories of jurisdictions within the County. It is not anticipated that this vM--be a detailed or specific analysis . It may, however, be possible to describe the relative impacts of various types of costs and benefits on cities highly dependent on freeways in comparison to those with less access and use. Similarly, the expected effects on other categories of jurisdictions and on major segments of the economy should be addressed. Task 6 Work Product A technical memorandum describing the Task 6 findings . TASK 7 - DRAFT ANu FINAL REPORTS It is expected that the project report for this study can be developed by updating each of the task memoranda to reflect revisions made at the time they are reviewed and any 10 - subsequent findings and then preparing an executive summary. The summary should cover all significant findings and include the consultant 's recommendation for proceeding with the freeway lam/ authority. The recommendation should be supported by appropriate findings and rationale from the study. FY 1988 BUDGET TIMETABLE January 5 -- President submits general outline of budget to Congress. - January 27 -- President delivers State of the Union address. January 28 -- Budget details submitted to Congress by OMB, February 25 — Authorizing committees of both Houses submit their reports and estimates of amounts to be spent, and amounts to be cut, from programs within their jurisdic- tion to the House and Senate Budget Committees. April 1 -- Budget Committees of both Houses report their respective budget resolutions to the. floor of each House. April 15 -- Deadline for action by each House on its resolution. June 10 -- Appropriations Committees of both Houses report all 13 appropriations bills on or before this date. June 30 -- Congress must adopt conference reports on all 4.� 13 appropriations bills before leaving for the Fourth of July recess. August 15 -- Congressional Budget Office and General Accounting Office issue their projections on size of federal deficit for FY 1988 . September 30-- Congress must pass final version of Budget Reconciliation Act to bring budget within Gramm-Rudman target. (No automatic cuts can occur, however, as a result of Supreme Court decision. ) October 1 -- Fy 1988 begins. Glossary of Budget and Economic Terms Appropriation—An act of Con. maximum rate at which the agency may delays or precludes the obligation or ex- gross that permits federal agencies to incur obligations, based on the rate of penditure of budget authority. Im- incur obligations and make payments the prior year, the president's budget poundments are classified either as r— out of the Trcasury for specified pur- request,or an appropriation bill passed scissions or deferrals. 1 , poses An appropriation usually follows by either or both houses of Congress the enactment of authorizing legisla• Obligations — Orden placed, tion. An appropriation act is the most Entitlement — Legislation that contracts awarded, services received common means of providing budget au. requires payments m any person or unit and similar transactions during a given thority, but in some cases the author- of government that meets the eligibility period that will require payments dur- izing legislation itself provides the bud- requirements established by such law. ing the same or a future period. Such get authority.(See borkdoor legislation.) Entitlements constitute a binding amounts include outlays for which ob- obligation on the part of the federal ligation; had not been previously re- Backdoor Legislation — Bud- government, and eligible recipients corded and reflect adjustments for dif- get authority provided in legislation have legal recourse if the obligation is ferences between obligations previously outside the normal appropriation pro- not fulfilled Entitlement legislation re- recorded and actual outlays to liquidate cess. The most common forms of back• quires the subsequent enactment of those obligations door authority are borrowing authority, appropriations unless the existing contract authority and entitlements In appropriation is permsnent Examples Off-Budget — Transactions that some cases (e.g., interest on the public.. of entitlement programs we Social Se- have been excluded from the budget to- debt), a permanent appropriation is curity benefits, veterans' compensation tay under provisions of law, eg., the provided that becomes available with. and pensions Federal Financing Bank. The face] sc- out any current action by Congress Fiscal Year-The fiscal tivities of these entities are not included year for in either budget authority or outlay ta- Budget Authority — Authority the federal government re begins on Octo- tale but a presented in a separate part to enter into obligations that will result bar I an ends on September 30. The of the budget appendix and as memo- in immediate or future outlays iawly fiscal year is designated by the calendar randum items in various tables in the ing federal funds. Thin term does not year in which itends,for example,fiscal budget include authority to insure or guarantee year 1988 is the year beginning October the repayment of indebtedness incurred 1, 1987 end ending September 30, 198fi Outlays — Outlays an payments by another person or government The Functional Classification — made(generally through the issuance of basic forma of budget authority are checks or disbursement of h) to liq• appropriations• contract authority and The budget eat require Congress to a- cash) obligations Outlays during a n-- borrowing authority. timate outlays, budget authority and gal year may be for the payment ass off,� // tax expenditures for each function.The ligation incurred in prior years ojasrt' functional classification is a means of the same year.Total budget outlays see Budget Authority Deferral — presenting budget authority,outlay end Any action or inaction by any employee tax expenditure data or terms of the net of offsetting collections, and ex• of the United States that withholds,de- principal purposes that federal pro- dude outlays of off-budget federal enti- lays or effectively precludes the obliga- ties grams see intended to serve tion di expenditure of budget authority, Rescission—The cancellation of including the establishment of reserves Gramm-Rudman-Hollings in — budget authority y provided under the an budget acy act as Legislations the 9ederal budged in 1985 C Y previously emended by the budget eR that requires the federal budget to meet � by Congress The Impoundment Con. The budget am requires a special annual deficit-reduction targets that trot Act specifies that the president message from the president to Congress would result in a balanced budget in may propose to Congress that funds be reporting a proposed deferral of budget fiscal 1991. rescinded.If both houses have not com• authority.Deferrals may not extend be- The measure set maximum penn pleted action on a rescission proposed yond the end of the fiscal year in which Bible budget deficits of $172 billion in by the president within 45 days of con-- the message reporting the deferral is fiscal 1986, $144 billion in Inca! 1987, tinuous session, funds being withheld transmitted and may be overturned by $108 billion in ftual 1988,$72 billion in most be made available for obligation. the passage of an impoundment resole- fiscal 1989,S36 billion in fiscal 1990 and lion by either house of Congress $0 in fiscal 1991. Reconciliation Process — A The legislation also established ac- procedure used by Congress to bring Budget Resolution — A concur•, celerated timetables for congressional existing law with respect to revenues,, rent resolution passed by both houses of action on the budget resolution and expenditures and entitlements into ran. Congress, setting forth aggregate levels appropriations bills furmity with the levels set in the budget and functional allocation for a fiscal Initially,the act contained an auto- resolutions year. The measure is not signed by the matic mechanism for making auou- president and does not have the force of the-board spending cuts(sequestration) Supplemental Appropria- law• if the deficit targets wen not met That tion—An act appropriating funds in automatic mechanism was struck down addition to those in an annual appropri. Continuing Resolution — Leg- in 1986 by the Supreme Court In the ation act. Supplemental appropria'' s islation enacted by Congress to provide absence of the automatic spending cuts, provide additional budget authori"./ budget authority for specific ongoing the law requires Congress to pass a joint yond original estimates for programs or activities in now where the regular resolution making the cuts. activities for which the need for funds is appropriation his not been enacted by too urgent to be postponed until enact. the beginning of the fiscal year. The Impoundment — Any action or ment of the next regular appropriation continuing resolution usually specifies a inaction by an executive official that act FY 1988 BUDGET - ADMINISTRATION PROPOSAL FY 1987 FY 1988 Appropriation OMB Recommendation i Obligation $ 13 Billion $ 12.787 Billion Ceiling UMA Trust Funds $ 1.003 Billion $ 1.374 Billion Federal Funds $ 2.450 Billion $ .130 Billion Total $ 3.453 Billion $ 1.504 Billion Amtrak $595 Million -0- - - Dot Total _ Federal Funds $ 8.806 Billion $ 3. 636 Billion Trust Funds $ 17.311 Billion $ 19.968 Billion TOTAL $ 26.117 Billion $ 23 .604 Billion COMM,10ani mnm 41 Iv]M M MM lM`eMMMN np " MYl MN IMN JMNNI1nM ISM nl+v ' • Wf 11LLY I1W InM I1x-n Ilxil I ]AM IeW I1r}N Iwv IeLI amlp ro r 1 xvw lfwrli.w hm lW M ),p,q ],A,p },IxFNI I,M,p ,Ilx,gl 1 ],]Y,q Il,ea.xxl ].]x,q 6]Y[ I I aw.xnm wmxl. I.MIm IyFp 'All IM I.M.. eJN.q faN,q n.p,q . ae.Nwen Ylbar m a.mm,x.mY. M.MM W.gl A.ql M. M. : IMI. nn.pl Im pr 1 Fm Fmfp I,MIMI FM,. ).M1. }.letq l MI m,p xlale.p n.w.p M.p In,p nl.p a.p t Mew ewm 1 e I I MM.MISR I.M.p ].A,p IWe.q IJ14p I,NI,p le.m.p a}n.p ]LM.q e Mx ImMMr Mi. amp I.Ml. I'M. MI... Y'4.. n.M.M n.M.M S.M.. enlml® 1 W x Mx bb e 1 a I'M. ;M I. I.A,p I.p.. ].xtp vA... fl,xl.q {1.*.. :o wlmtlm b1m n{e uI ps qs. A,p MIM M.m ... 111..M. ILe.p 110e.p I.MI. 11 0Is 6lmtlbw Nl,p al.q IJI,p a.p : p.p d.q N Ma WGIRMS $.M.. Fml.p I.xe,q I.... "mm : ll.xl.p 4yl,q M.la,q I,A.M },m.p I.M.. IW,pI Il.ea,pl : 1IAA.p1 III,IIFpI III.In,pl II b r.w'r!r lefel IM*bMeab I,A.p ).M,p },p,p LM.q ),ea,q Lam I.M.p I.mm M !M NI.o IMixtl Lbr,p In.p Il,me,pl ILill.gl IF{N,ql t x1,M.g1 ll1,m),gl Ilx,leJ.gl e I n® WII4)plx 1{ Mmm I Gry+nr!,w Yrl hm {,ta,p II.nI.p II,M,p FIAp 1,la,p I 1,{a.q 11.'dFgl 1.{a,q Aa9H n fwU611m bale m.p I.xfl,p p I,oa,q IM,q ],al.q MW MI'.. le ruv f®rtlle M.. mm MI mm M.M 1 .1M.. I.M.p 1•)a.p n mm MI= .In.p M.. A,p M.. I I.M.q 1.IIO.q t19e.p a wtx aWaMxb MI" MI. a.q I,m.p a.p I,m,p IAu,q idx.ex 11 blemleM4nla®le[q MI. I,a].q m.p lll.p e I 1.M.q 0 t]n.p II WY w. OMI' N 1.9Y.q I.M,p I,m.q a MrmM h4a axua{ e u Ivw Iee. a,p,p a.p,p n.M.eoe a MR.MOH M Mm xIM. x.)a.q 1.91.p M,q n..'. I ILM a Ma AMI1NE M]A n.M,p mfn.q IFm.q v.M.p :a4.p N.Ja.W 1:.'M v.4a.q aM MU I — n len a)m6 bb)mxa{rbl M"'. 4.116,00 .MI. FM,p Fm,q 1 a.N),q J.M.p a MI,M MI..W. M. M,p M'. Im.q Im.p I p'. M.. III,. 11 bbrmmt Intwel blMt I e v nm9W iw lr aw.Yet I.M.ea I,ne.p Fm.p un.p I.L{,q f.q.q e.an.Aa )1 aM YrMlum I.a4p F M I,M.q I,e19.p I.ue.q e.la.q I.nB.xO n MI411MSI. Fla.q ).MI. 11MIp 1.01p xAn,q a,M'. I'M. M.)N.q a burnt 1 wm,m le WI hu 11,]IFp I$,al,p FM,q I.p,p II,M,pI II,M,pI n,9.M1 II,M,1V. MCIBIOM ® � WWrr .I btm,m I term nu Yx I.. u,en MI. n,x0 n,q a t m.p Mrm a lu" x.p u,p 4,q m.'m I11,Ne L M-.a M¢NYa®letp ),W ].SI ].q a M. 1 41M n xv Iva a,q U.q li MIY aMY[ - M,p ft,p tr,p e e I ID,p � e J,YW . 31 M4 twIW[MIN M.. M,p Im.. M,. a M.q 1 1".. IxMIM)] x lee hlmrinlle\mml 1{,Jx llq n,p 11.p fll,p NLA n aew bam.e M Ma M MI11E] 1Fp n.p n.p II.Ym M'. 1 a". a btem.I Y..ra.w t.bt nw m,q n,q n,p o e o u br w r xr ro.a l.x4{4wlmwt. a,q n.q n,ma u o n lM w...m lwlmel o e e I t 4 Imm.m a 4nrNv hm Iw rru m.vFp m.m.q IFt4,wa F1m,q I.W. IFM,q b.q.pl MIMI. a Mla Nrwe a,M,q IpM,q ],ev,q l,eu,q FM,p u,al,uo n,p,q a,la.q M wrm lv4Yx[ipM m.lu.p 1Fal.q m.:n.q 11.911,q r.ve.q a,M". 31.011M vFta.lm x IJlu wmntlF) MS.. u,nl,q n.al.q n.m.m F'.A.aW u.n1.eM M.m.q u1.M.q m urnM I w.a.e t.bt um m.w,p N.nJ,q e,lx.q x,M,p Il.q,am M,pr nFeN,gl ne,evr,pl v wt rw I ar re.m lmll.a Yw•wtu I,MAq x,M,p 1,Ne,q },rm,q Flyq 'I,p,q I,M.p FM,M • ss WNI4NMMIWMIn iFeMM II,111.Me )Jm.IW Iml.gr I"Im'.l I'.M.gl .a,f= Im.maeW Cal,wMIM NImO0.1 Ialb aN®1nrr®o®us laaS=A I6l n!•111YX IfF XXr wliu In Iww Ib0 IMiI IwW IIIMI 1 trs letY Nrlil wnr NW 09YM 1 bow l belO,.III W M1� 141wF II.IR,W IM M 1 111M.M IF,M II.T.W 61Q I 1 Ne•M II Ia YIveM !}X.M 1}YF IF.M AIa.W IIF.w. 1 µ M wIMM ID,mF ! 6Y.re�INlMlry le 11e1W n,eYM IW.wI IWM IYI.WI IIAMI Im.w! I W.aW M`M 11.•II.IW l. 1 ren },III.W l.m,M l.a4W I,M.W I.MM 1 IMM aF.w f Ie1eM f Hello_Iss n4M wF NI,M MF 1N.w I I.m.M • I.M,w 1 we Y.eN � 1 0 1 .. r Ilbnllb - aMM SIMM IIMM II.MM MM I MF.W $..,AF m.Nr.M I ! by MY.a{rMv IIF.M AM.M NFF N.m.W Kn4M I n.m.M W.w.w m.m.M mMlwM i 1 waM,II Y W 0 1."MI 14W.W IMM.W II.WF I4M.W 1 µn4W IAw.M II M11 WIWIY wIWII WNY YI. q1,M mF I4.w 1.10.M I.m.w I IF.W 1.WF S.M.IIW u W.y.xr.. • • n n111 pX111® II.DI.nI 11,b,M YFF AM.M N.W.M 1 N.NI.W IA.W.M MF.W N I4M..M1[WIE.I N!M 1W u.n4M IMM 1SM.W 1,MF 1.•Il.w I •.W,W IAw.MI nl.w.M1 1• Mlv'I ar Mr M1tlr rWe�U I,W.M l.mjtl I.O,M iJq.•Ip 1.m.M I.bF Il.m.lr U.W.w U IWWeMIMWtI 411.w f.Il1F ],M.M 7m. Wm.MI I AF.MI Ia.b.M1 M.M. Mlb rbm 1 n Ye.niteww Nalalae aF,w w.M.M KM.. Kw.W n.M.W i AMI.IM a.m.w ".M.W 4nM I a rwbvlls lW MIM 4W.W }.MM I.M. W.w I •F.W Ir.M I.b.w N rWe WW11M b.W b,M b.W OM b.M 1 I.M.M M..w I.M.w n UM I.I%M 1}a'. 1}Y.M I.mF 41n.W 1 4MI.W "..W Ilml. ID Y.N bWIryl 'MS.. N.M N.M IMI,SIS Ir.M I I.M,M 1.m.W 1MM a hMYllnoallsYls l,l0.r 4nr.M I.M.W I.IAw 1,m.w I A.m.. Lnl.w IS 4YU W b pMa II ],In.M I 1F.W 'M.m lF.w a naYW raA YIW—t e - o n We IWY M,al.w � ap14M a,all,M n MYNIINK wF.w n.1AM r.w.M n.W.M I.m.lw t N.•4M nJn.w In.IKM r nnl"I'MU MM Iuda.W MMI. AM.W n.u4M wm.M IN,a1.M a..W \� mMnlm — 21 J Y,•t YIe.1 rMI II,M,M U,IY,M 14m.M Am.•n II,IX,M a.fU,W N.lwF AIN,W a nm.a WlMuee lNee 4M.w 41a.w MISM ID.Jw 4IAW n.W.w n.M.W AW.W N MYeI�I bl�l r11�tI Y nvNYM WIr Yw1YY1 I,III,M I,Ill.w IdIbW 11 wW 4•M,Yw 1,«!.w I.IDF 4ID.w 4ID,W I.ID.W 1 n,m.W 11}A,w a IML WIMMU A.W,M a.M.w A1X.w N.w,w IM,M : Itl,•M,W U,IN.M MISS.. a rYrw•[vNw Y YI Ne *jJSM KM.M ;'M M A.W,w n.M.IN ISM.w N.Ill.w 11.nI.Ya r rmm IS Yv.n•terri.s r.Y M1 UJ Idn.w M. now n.w n.M I I.MM a.W I'm^ n IJ Y Y IN.MIpMIIeIW IY� MM n.M 16W l.w I.W 1 IN,M I,W In.W A IYw Jeu 1 a � MY mM[ M.M IIF 1•.w I'M I,w 1 w.M I.W 111.w A MY wWw Mu ldN.w mw b.W Ii.w a.M I.a4m u.w Idn.W 4 w•mww IYYW w.W w,w M,w I.WF yw,M Il we uWnuw _ a IolY mmlll® Al.w lµw M.W • I I 1 I,Iu.W U We.l•Irr..i.M UY1.Y m.w w.W A.W R.W U.w 1 a.W Y.W. IIM « Y11w'.ar r.w Mnll Ynrlrl m,W IAW I1,M IIF n,w I a,W ISM, ,W u U rw w.Ys,MwU • 1 • 4 wWl IYI«W le lelwiw XWIeY � e _s � � Y_Y •v__ •NV.••IN.N..Nx IW Nv R,III.W IM'. 0.n4Wn,IN.W D,b,M R,III.w p Hahn"' N.N.W A,In,w AIN,w KYI.W AM.W 1 W.IN.W I11.M.W M.Ur,W 4 inY Y41J1[iMlr ln.N1,W 1AIn.w III,W.W Iµ:14W It.on.ln I a1.M.W III.w.W I.,".11 n1Y mMMM KM.W KOI,W KNI,W A}U,W D}KW lI4 M,w R1... m.I14W I N 4wW 11-~t•MNv In,N1,W N,111.W IIY,w IIJaM '.Ia,w 1 v.>AW 11 W,w UM:. fl YI.W eYI IenY leepN rlweewY 41N,W I.LI, _ 11 MYI(Nl Y,wlLlll K111,W r.NO,M, N,III,W N.UI,M 'I'm'. : MI. 1011m Il,n1,W. — � � aaq IblYb g91M L 3 YMI • glr®1 a YaIY w Ib Ipl IBO IIIFa 1�nMl 11171111�• IY IIiV IYN IYif nM IM11 I }pm MY 111}N Iww IMI aBMItlIY 1 1 Ne,s I lY/Pe.Y Nm Ir f. I 41Y•w AM•M I,al,w f,m1,w IY,%b I I.IY.w 1•.w,rl I,IY.w IA9l I 1 M N a M1.1. I,M n` I,M•ml 11/4M 41n,M 41Y,r I P.M.. %A%,M If1,M,M I 1..4 1 wb1F la p•s Mw%s ggMl .... .,Ms W... IM,Wn I 11•YLwI II,M,wI Q.MI w 1 rw 1IM,M LIMO s m 1•Y,M I,M,M 1 I.m,M I.a1.M qM.M f Itlm.LL eT011wrl0 f4M M,M ai•w Im.r • 1 I,M,M I.m.r W Me I — 1 r mf4 alm nm.w 4fI1,M 4Y0.w 4M,M 4M.r 1 u.M,•b Iq.w,w IgM.M 1 Yt e1111Y[1MY 414M MM,M Ir,ml,M WIMM 11•M.M 1 InIMM MAR. Ilsmm MMII® 1 f MNYWYFeIe 4m.M n,M.M 4M.. YiM.W IE,m.M I MYI,Y IP,W,M M,. M II 41111tlm II[w e I e M mI ep. I.M,M lel•Y IA4Y I.III,M I,Ae,M 1 f,m,M ley,r 141MY.M u mr 41.g1..[ 1 e I II IlatmYlYY IIjRM Y,91.Y II.W,w 4M.M II,YIAgI I R,M,Im I4.11•,. 5,91,w Y I�MIe.f<•m FY•11r 4M,. I,M•r 4m1,W IbNmM %,w.Ml I N,M,•bl mARM) 14MI. N r1W'•S•I M!!wl[I hw/�U ;Im.M e.M,. I.M. I.M,r I,m.. I IMI. I..M.. II.M.r Y Iw Ya s MMU I,M,mf a4M a,]Ilatl IyR,r1 14Nf.RW I III,r.wl I4.Y.pM IgN1.mT I s Mnl Irm 1 u 1[W.T IIerP[,m IM Iw lr 9A4M 4gl.M 4M•w m,M.. 9.M.M I 9,M,M R,ID.M 9Aa.M 1 ml. 1 Il ssMMp M.M I,M,w S.W.IY LW.. w.. 1 ro..0 w.. "..m u r[[n 4w%Is M,w M,M Ir0.M M,M MI. I W'.. 1A.. I...w U mb M.I9 MIMn.m MIM M,w m.. 1 L..w I,M.r I.M.. a W[N4WFtlm1• 1}Rw -In M. S.M,Y M,. I f..,. I.TI,w f,m,. n 4Ww1eYtl1®4m Lou,. 1,M.M I,M.. ;M.. I,M,W I aAa.r E.M,M 'n.l n.w a 4YF W.4 TYYY Y f,M.W I LM.w ],M,Y a Inss' 4NF 41rw1 1 e e T Ilr YmY 4ul.ae 1 4m,w 4nI.. a mM @9m SAm.M f.Y,M yM.r II•M.. 1•M,M 1 nAY,w I4.MI. IYAIa.r Y mR M11MlIwM III.M,w %,YI,M m,91•M R,M.. RM,w I IY.Y.. 1•,M.. III.SR.M mY11® a Y,•N W[I YF I/ww111W IIAI.W Il.lq,M I;M.M .,M,r MW.M W.M. Y.III,W M.'. a tl.w[S fYlwwfTw I,Ye•M ;M,r 1,W,. I,M,w 1.b,M t 4M,r W,r a.W,w . n MI,M" N,mr1I11We I e - N ..s,M, FNin al l,W.w lss'. ";.. a Y.4wmY/.. 4M.r Ipl,w I,W.w I.ml.r I.w.r � a.nyM a.n:.M n Imm mMllm9 a,f4w adn,M v.M.r v,W,M aA14. n1.M.M vAl}l Ia.irl.. n e[..•.1Wn.w le rl•w anus n,m,r Y,bl,w a,r,M 4ae,w a,m.M a,al,w n,a1..N n 1[v.m a 4Yldv Nn W[IIY IN,M "Ins Ill,w qM am I IN,w MIME a IY lw M,r 0.00 M,mo 1 I,mnm I,m,In L W I'Muswlw I,M t,w I,r I'M I'M t L.r a.. n M.Is a A WILMIM M. m.M m,. I.M I'm ! ..m.. I,Sn,M n MN rnItlE roM W,. IMw M.. m.M a.. I,rn,M 1 I,nr,00 le wmmW lw.0 ai.. Ar.. M.r 4r 4r � I.rir.•m I.rIr.W 11 eIM 41Y41Yx ' m 1.IsMIMf m,w m,. as". U,M R. 1 I,]II,M 1 ...... R Ixvn a eYF'e•w N Ml lv II,I,.M 'M. u l e'1 bw rmNN NPIY.N 1•Lw Y,w b,. 0 I e IS I.WmYIMmII 1 I 1 I 1 • 1 Y401114P4N Is b[Yiml 4wlvY � ®a. e_ ®o .e® .nr•® 11 4Wn I WT .4Y Is.Is. MM.. %,.,M M,M. A.W,w S.M. 4A,IT,r .M. 11 mIY mTY qm,M %,NS,M L,bbw ll,l%,w T,W,W I INAIe,M :n,iA,W Elf,m,M q %III NWMa.1. Ib,W,W III.m,M Im,YIiM Y,m,. R,%I,W 1 S4a3.. M.m,. A^0111 11 so.A.sIMI )1,Je,M a.... A.M.. )l,ra.w Nnq,M 1 M,m,. Ig3N.. 3MA4. Y Inv.I W/•q,a lo.nl,w R,M,. T,W.w mAl1,M EI,M,w a,g1,M b,gl,M ,IlA1,eM1 IIl,a1.W1 fl NI Yv'[Y.N,Y rWge.,/,r11 S.M.. yr4. I'M. i,IXW I,AE,w I.'y.M II,IiI,W II,LY,w II !w!q/IA a,Mmll qEN.. 4M,. L,m,M M.,. n.m,M 1 n.m,. Ia,lm.wl 14111,M1 0N1 MUM Ilmm 141 mYY m19111v 16'8xp rq no InniO AAA rl3m+ne IMO v®IImx3 Im+u Lm Ilµ1P IxI�O IIiAI IwIM Im�11 1 3-rw rew 1131e lo-rw Iqu 1 Yv.x a brryr F.Ixe w ;m,JeA ldll,la ]An.m ;ue.hN .4m.00J I ;m.aoo e.lm.JJl l,m.w x nm.M n Im wlx., m III... ;in,Jw JIM'. i u,m.Va a.... s %c Arwtlr.11,I.ewx n.x.0 la.nw I0..1 la.m M.. .,Wl I na. . MI.., :m.w r rw mm ru.JN MI. ro.oM Ire.wl 1 1"... ].m.0.tl rAaJ' 1 %I.xlla.ull..m lnw Itl,m xu,W m,m m,Jm m,fW 1 I.m.w nl.Yw :,W.J% I 1 ma urea 1.10.m uw,de ],m,wl 1,a3.wo f.m,oa I n,al.JaJ n.)w.mJ n.m.w I e lma whlla[rmm I,m,JJo ..mm 1,m3,w r,m,wo u,m,m I n,m,olh am,m n.m.hw MMMM IW.el rYvl lM.n e o I.Sm,w .bm.NO l.w4aw l.m ]dn.JN I lo.ln.wJ x Jw w n.L4 la wlRµe 91ar n l o tM mAx ps. M.Ptl m.wJ m,pl mm wJ m.YO ym.4m ",I"r.1J1.Yw 14ul.tw II nes 6leaNx 1 n II Ipxa nRllma ;hm.W ;yl,wl 2.701. ;mAw l.ml.. I l.lµ.w3 n.lµ.w a.M.. II IM...B{ImlPpl bY.l rw x.m.gq ;mm 30%. 41mw e.lm.Jm I.Im.PO II.x1fM Ir.alr,W I. Mrp.pr MMfmllN lgl..wb 1.J$m LIO.m LID.oY I,m,JA1 I,m,W I I,n4m Ln1.OT. S,n1,JN IS 1.Wms 1.1.11 I.xe.W ;1n,A ;m,W I,nI a.m.W I i,m,tw I..1µ.J% Mtn.. Milk mn, IS fi/..m a[✓mm Fx bN lw 11.9;Jw II.NI.m 1.1n.W ].Iw,J% I,m,wr I Il.ne,m iw.w Il.ne.wf Yana n IMSI.tm Fx3. Iy.Jw m.[w ne.Ad Sle.tw w.wJ I.nl.Jw w.ow Lk].W' n I— lmxnu m,wJ m.W LIm.Jw rm.w lY,4M Ine.w I.rm.wJ ;ZZ n Ilw 3.%N M e,Ytl I.uw r.W m,aw ro,YP m w..I Smm,w llwb m.wJ nI..'+ u.wJ m.000 m.wJ ne,aw xl.00J I.m.un.. It mI...N a...I—I.— m.. III m.Jw m.Pb m.wJ :.Sa,M k.m ;4l.aN 9 n.W.b ol.me n 2^m L.M. 2.ow.111 n nxem Ewl<r"Imrwe x,lgm :..u. S.M.. u mew INr n,Ym 4m,m la,wJ I,w,m ;m,w ID.aJ :.An..•r.. n nla vlvEla I,Iw,m S,.n,wo ],m,JJo 3}z4w I,m,aw u,Bn,lYo s,m,ew n,w.w 1h Iam ev.IllYf lmla Ie.]1f.m 91e1B.. 14011. IA.FN 111.31 a n,:n.AJ 41w,uur n.IY.ux ` / Exmlll� '�I :'1 AmNlm.x wx lnxwlPWl E.m,w ;em,Jm S.m,w x,311:W S,L= Il,m,[W ;fiB,w] Ir,]1i,W, 1B %.V,tt WIN%x fpin IAm. l,m,Jw LmIm Int. Ian,. : ISIII.W W,Jw ILr13.uw :1 Wmvmwt W-1 Axwla µ,%e 116w3 YNAw 2,Yw r9,we : 1,3w,Jw :44,w )i rypy.Ne[W,t/YLNwt J 11 Y1En 4.wa11vn 1: IOlk flawllJK .,1n,[w S.II;W O,m1.W r,x4:'w S.m.m t VA13Nw :,a.m u.01— :3 1--, Ita YN Il,lhl,tw 1.1" ,Jn Sdu.m I,m.Ow Ia,Jw 1a,611 i.In.W S 1.C.a It Num .®e® .v® ........... ..m...... ........... It A µ (dryd.x Fm LaN I.N 9.Aw 3,Jw II.Jw ]8,fw 9.Ym n.0% J �.J>' Hama J Im lnl It. 9.Jw 9.m il.tt0 x.w3 w.Jw n IeNxtlli.tNlmxm law x.KO x,Jm ;m x.w0 I,. : f:m u ]r lbn Inw m wm InSU UFw a.Jw 14m a.a0 I.wO x,wl auµ a Ima rvnulx M101u SI,Ym n,wJ m,%0 Si,m ssaro m,oW 12I.1t U1m1119 —•. We...xnl L .tnnL n.ow 9,m v.aw u,w u.wJ III.. ¢Ipn' ai Bux E.whrtux u wlk EVII n.. n.Jw n.W :O.W .,1. nI.JW It Ixx.x I Evn'An.b wN um n.uw It.Jw u rot,w'I ur rx,M rxe:.J enm..wt. u,Jm n,w. :e,w n.m e w fuM III t Ir IINNNr 0 yMJr Iia,ultl,m IevimJ huawN .Wme. •®ed ,m..em. .eo...m. oum..d "'^mm mmm.. Wry+l.x Fme Lilt 1- O.IILJW 1.113,101 I;.,Ml. IM.L. II•Jn.va : Il.11l,uw B.In,YYe I1,IIIryA a 1414 A1E1¢E i.W.um ),u.:.uw .,:m.uw 9139.uY 1,IES.uw N.W.uW I:pn..N )4in•r ,1 Ills 9PIG%(INllni - U.m,uYJ 11,111,W .r1r,JJJ IA.JIo,.W ILfw,Vi, a,IM,rW A1.: ;:IE,w / 11 19181(IEEaIi WE3 1,]IyNN '1.11J.:gp ).]w.Jb 9,Jw w.9A},JW il,Sll,u4a n,m,to. ,1' xlfmp-0nr.e An.ml U.n1..W O.v➢.W IJ.S®.Jw ILYn,W BIm.Yw B,aB,WI 11.919.aV 0j,". ei r.n,x/.wr iN,n rne,N YN../..m. LKLuW 11212. y:µ.Wi I,m.am L)u.wJ ....... S.nl.-. x.)n..4. sx %Iw w::xE OA.menu c,n;gym I],u;.w E,w;.m mu,Yx er9,mJ e,ew,wJ u,Jaa,Jm n,�wm Im111m111m M.4 W. ILLY mRLp N ImDIN W 110 Y!R[RI. rnm nm Ira n®Imr MI-, LR IwT IAHII IIN# 1. I1M1 IeW Nmlw rm — "OnIt"I I Ixrwrlmrlmer nY law I.m.M I.R.m I.M,m I,m,m I.m.M i I.m.M I,m.M I.m.m Milk 1 I I•x Ill uww. NM.w I'kkM I.w.m I'M. I.m.M i •.m.. 1.ul.m 4m.N1 ! e.L rxxrr Ylw:l.m axwr n.Irl. 14An tINM` R/NI Im. R." : =. m.. M.. 1 14M nl.m I,m.m I.m.m I.m.m I.M.- ILW.m ASN.m s wxN l YY.uww lu In,M n.w 14M I4m I..m m.M 4M W.K AM 4.Y 1 ma mm! ..MI. I.nl.w l.m.m 1.111.m LM.w u.1—.M p.ur.m u.Rl.w 1 Wa MntlllmR LRLw I,W.m I.61,M l.Ns.M lIINM i UJR.m I MINIM sW.0 lmx Yl.elo I.W.m I'mm Llp.m L.I. I.m.M 1 n.M.m R.m.w v.ur.M n W Ix11.Hnx e 1 e w Nw Iler. IV.m Ia,M M.m nl.w a.m I neM I.m.w L.I.w n ew I.. e n mn Olminm I.M.M l.m.(N L m l.In.M Lm.w i n.Mm aa..M am.m o rwwr lraryAl uYrLw I.m.M Lm.m I.a1.M IIm.m Lm.M i I.m,m m.M UN. II V1 Iw'r ar MYfwlw YNrlmN M.M I.n1.M "It Nin.M Nw.w I I,m.M Lm.M Lm.M R rw Y1m.IW mu m.w a•.NI al,m m,M m.M m.M n.m.4N n.m.xX .Ilk lmlx � � -- 1 0 -�• sY I u Mw.w lllr{wl rr.WlW Lm.m LWAM LnLm I.m,m Lw.m I S.M. Lm.M Lm.m 11 im. k. M.M .m m.m 4m I I.IR.m N.w I.nl.m 11 xeY (aI[II. 1.n4M IIlk. M,M a..m .m 1 l.m.M I,IA.w I.m.M II NYr I. . w.w UN. bI.M III.. I IAI.M I.M. b Wra Lorna, M.m U .M. M.m A.m 1 Nl.w m.m I.m.M a M.I..,.Wm m,M V.I. IL.M : IAA.M o l.M.m n W 1r LI•N NxnN x L10.M 1 LM. e 0 Lm.M Itn�•.a wu rlxlel - N Nm xmY M,M I w.00 M.w y rylY W4 NMIW I.w.w 1-imm W,m IIAN,m l,lA,w a.m.M b mY ONwA imw II,RI.w I.w,M I.xl.w Lm.m LIII.M I I•,m.M I.m.w k.m. wumm6 a for.a In.I rw IaIm1 na 2IMM Lm,w :.m.M lml,w Lm,M i a,R,w I.ALIA Nn%M Y xwlll WIaI.IIxx M. w.M A.w I.IN.M M.M I Lm.M 2J4w N IxYual W`Mk r rwY e A N.1eY WnYlmal I.W,M I,M,M I.MM 11 NM FaxY.wx 1 D flla mwllND I.w,m I.01.M LM.w W.M Lm.M : IN..M LW.. 2Nx1.M A avnrllaTr,YNYt Iw I,Ill,m L111.m I.m,M LW.M I.m.m 1 I.n1,M II,W,Y4 ILW.Im sue. s® N Wxrx!furre.p H.lw Iw N,M D.M 1 1 1 4.M N.w pNw R M Yw IN 4M 4M a Wxxl luxalxm Wm Lw • e 1 e i im • LM n ew Wa a a4 RLp1L 4w 1 e i N.M 4M III ma wIWN MR VIM VW I 1 i wM lam Iwaw! — a w MxaW 1 Mora n,M D,m INM Rw 11 Na Iwe4 Wn R .1.wmlllm x.M a.m 1 1 'N. I U.m 1 U Ywm 1 IUTe,v le brl Iw p.M 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 wl w-r In HM HnY Incrrra. D.w 1 1 1 N rM Wro. Nxm11 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0WI IYMIY I.Ir11VYl lrmlxN s s -- 1 Y 11 erwmA MIk`l4x ir.lYl la LL11Y4wW I,nNI,,MM 1,= I'm.. MIN. 1 L14M Lm.M 1.14m 1 DwV1,M ll}I.M q m.wlWl rmR MW,M ILm,w VM.m 4m.M CMIM I a.M. R,m.m R,m.M n ma wWlll® Lm,m I,Ryw LIb,M am,w NVNM 1 a,m,M 21.101. x,W.w I N Yww1tinierUmllw ..111.M Ld.w I.m,w I.RLM I.m.w I Lm.M I.M. II.I... fl Mlw"r YI HIY FY.rI4prxmr M.M I,Ix.M I.W. I.b1,M I,m,w I l,M.M 1.14m p 1M m/a A Iwlpll y1A.w LID,. l.m,m I'm.M I,m,M 3 14N.M 4m.m1 ILs11,MN w mgtl9W nmm a r nnM f IL S Hgam SW n0 gISB q3A nfla 1®III{.I 1019ran ININ • Ila IlK IMi 11611 1111•m 11T11 1 YIYw IwY 11H'91 IMM reW I DUllla IM 1 1 1sa{bt{Rx Rv W l� I.M.M LgLOm I.W,(Y fAaM_ I.In.M i Lffi.M r.m.M ;m.M \_ z ILh. MMnm. 1.W.M ;m.W ;aLM ;'ff LM.M I nam. mMI.M 1 6L rlmM WLIIn r Ms n.w.ls m.Ml W.MI .1. T.tM W.MI I IIn.IM nH.MI IM,M 1 rw 1KM -m.M NI.W W.M In.M 1 1A;M I= ].M.M f IYNYm{4ealw lv 3KM In.W ul.w M.M m.W 1 Wl].M M.M l.]m.M OM ! ! r namlMI ;Ill.w l.pl.M Lm.M LN1.M l.m.M 1 ➢.M.W ➢.M.M 9.la.M 1 In4 N]pY(IWM 4IN.M 'l.fl0.(p 9.yLW Ie.W.W Il.fa.W I AaI.W II.N.W OMISSIONS!! I 9 wt.w M . a LW.W l.m.M I.M.r ;W.W 1M.M 1 I%M:M A1N.W MR. 1! WImtl.IMs.{OMNp Nw. m.M mjm LmLM I.IY.N! 4u;W 1 ].I n.M r.p➢.M ILIMM u n m LUMOIm 1.lAOA ;M.M ;qRM I'M.W I.YLW I n.m.M AW.M m.IAM N Os.alfwPl.wm Wl M1w IAn.W "MM ].W.M l.Yr.M r.➢9.M 1 l.m.M ].M.M I.M.M 11 W Mr..bS Mw IMy IM. I.L1.M I.a].W I.M.- ;M.M ].]m.M 1 1.Rm.W 1.A.M ;m,m IS iW WOSIWItlII LVRM ;qLM I.W.W I.YI.M ].M.M 0 e I N11141W]b I 1 N WHIM{(nn•ar lM lnt lw D.III.M II.W.W A.W.M n.m.W ➢.IKW I D.]I;M AW�M a.]II.M 6HQ 1 n ts1Yn11s 4M. IMw M.M m.M m.W H.M ;n1.M H.W ;mm 11 Itn, fm.[Ilu I.M.W IAm.M I.M.M I.M.M I.M.M 1 ;W.M ].M.M IZ.M.M 1S Ww IKM IKW m.M IKM IMM 1 m.M I.Ia.M S.NI.M P h 4Wln 4{q! M.M NAY II.W W.M ➢.W Nr.W m.M I.n1.M D IM"S I nollxlp to I.m.W !.'lm.M .I.m.M 1.a1.M l.la.W I II.m.M ].SI.M 1I.a3AN IS IMn W.u flwltl 11 I.m.M I,M,M I,In.W ➢ ni1xM F111M1 Y1u11M[ I.W.W LIN.M I.IN.M a IIb 1® o e IS m4n\i MM.M IAn.W ;m.M I.M.M 1.1q.W I n.M.W ......M .4111m m M4 MWWIWW MWIM ➢An.W Am.M mAN.M YAILM I ]I.]q.M Y.M.W 11.M.W MOMM1 `NI P mw.N WN YlY 1nYlM Xat 3.W.M 3.Iq.M SAa.M 1.W.W 4111.M I I;IKM 3¢.M q.9.M 9 NNIm wt..SnW W.M I.MAM I.m.M I.M.M m.W I ;M.W mm ].M.. n WYYfMIIm®tr.MM I S a b nwutYY FWn Z"W'M 1 11 0111 hlsllly. AM RM D.M IS m4 di91llen I.m.W I.lt2.M IAN.W ).]q.W LW.M IL111.W I.m9.M SI.M.M IS lee.YY{4rr1-o.wuallor b.W.M )I.W.M fl.m.M ➢.W.W ➢.m1.W 1 H...M HIM. IWIWNI ® ®.. ®. ..me..s N Ov.x{WISw lq lttt lv l.]L.M I.rRM I.rn.M M.W IMM S.M.M m.M 1.M.M H9W[ n mlm m.M m,W M.W v I.I.ttl 1NYNluwYlnu Im.M M.M 11.W n.W II.M m.M I.M W.M n Mr.- 3 Nm Hg( IY.W IN.W mAY P.M IY.W W.M I'mW.M n IMZ.IMWU IWW ,M.M I.e:9.W IARW m.M W.M 1.W.M IY.M I.n1.M m rl hlatw lewnl W.W ]n.M M.M W.M W.W ;NLM .,M ;a1.M u In✓r.I.Iu✓. - q Ink DMIU S qI.W M. Su m vI.M m.M 1 S.."M MI. x.en.M q Mx9tt 1 Grn<.n 1.at Iw I.rn.M I.m.M MAW nNM M.M M.M o .— N WIIw.wl r..lxely{xYrM.t. ;IRM I,M,M M.W no,M M,M M,M e q I✓]Wun✓ 1.1.11 0 1 9WI IYNIa Is IMr+ ..Nxn 4 Ixx.x 1[xr1-0r ps YY I.v HIM.M bAMOn P.YLM P.YN.W P.Ia.M L.M.IY n.IN.M R.OH.M 11 IM,MMQ 6311.M I.m�M I.m.M 9.]N.M I.m.M ]I.W.M 11.114W H.3q.M IS 01..1.1 MHUI q.3N.M IM,. N.W.W Ia.m.M 11 nlm Wc1NINfl YAq.M I.BX.M 4M.M BAl1.M ;NI.M 1 Ie.YI1.M D=111.M n.M.M n I.v9x 1<urr9m.lnt lw bAN.M P.YI.W PAN.M P.In.M Y.W.M m.W.M q.Y1.M 4A11.0p fl m111s'.61 M.w lWylYµnYYen ;M.M S.m.M S.11r.M LIm.W 1.W.W : S.Sm.W I'm.W 3^M a MS 1gAV1 a ImI11T ➢..H.M N.919.M ➢.In.M AIY.M nAN.M n.M.M mn Mnlw loom a 11 ImW • mlml d wrsm d•am - n6{Q!I\1Y911®Ilb•Y Im�In Yd IIYV IIOY IWiN nN'm IM11 HN IIW INF4 16M IaW pBwll M r— I I I 4in11 br{aI ax YY M },w.M i,lrl,w I,w,w %I,M W]rMl 1 ],wrw 1},IN,MI }.M,M � 1 S bY.Y I[)Y Ylvws IrWrw }.al,w Sra,w I,1Nrw ;W,M nr]N,M IY II MI. am,lW I 6L IraA/MwIF la W�uwtiv ,xW III,M1 M.. MIMI IY,MI 1 Iw,MI 10 IW,MI 1 (M m,M a1rM a1,w Saw W,r I I,IO,M 1,lx,M LM,M ] Ill.vl i 4rv11YM Is a1,w a1,M n,M o o I W,M I 1 Maawd 1,111,M L94M },W,M I,MrM 1,W,M I P.W.M %,m,M a,n1,M ! IOIIL IYOW]Iww IA),w I,M,w I,a1.M 1,WrM i.laM 1 a10.M a.W.r Y,dl,r I Mwll® t 1 w�Y MY bb1i0 I.Mm },91,M [,w,w 1,M,M ymrM : nAa.M MIMI. am,M x WIMI.irllw!1 o r nV M. n;w W.w M.M I.IwpA W,M I r.x1.M yW.M r.W.M u a.a1vtllM i 1 n m4 msllm uaw ;Mow I. I,Wrm I,M.M I a IMw 1 fl,r!'1r1 n Y!M ),In.M I,M.w W.w Iw,MI L.^ I n.w. I,W.MI w.U1.M1 11 Mrr�lal MYlsIw YNVrrn I,W.w I,W,M I,w,w S,aI.M },W,M 1 ),W.m I,W.M I,W.M n rr W®s MItlU w,w N,M II.W,MI x,Ib.MI N.W,Nn t II,M.MI In.M., 111.1aM1 11 brYw.lf�lwrr hs lalM 41n,w I,UIrM I,W,M ],INrM I,W,M : I,m,M I,W,M Irm.M URN II rmbx11v 4vb IaM M,M In,M W,M In.M IrW.M In.M Ms'. x !wn [rxns 2.M 2,M la,M n1,M raw I,M.M I,YI.M I.Mm d OM N,w Y.W Y,M Y,M Y,r 1 W.M W.r MAO a Wl Nlgwllmm w.M II,M IAM m,w n,w 1 I,Ib.w I,Ia,M LW,r a nWift lww lrs I14M m.M w.M 4mm W.w }.M,M Ia.M KOMI.. a WF WI F Wllx[l N I^- I.W,M I.MIM II nxYvl[W II4Fnw1 M'm III.M Ilt•w )1 FY as Id,M ),O,w I,IaM I,w,M 1 II,IaM ].M.M a Ma lelmc l,w,m Lm,r Lln,r l,w,r Lal,r a.w,Ile I,IIar n,w,w a Ipfa]IIp,N]MW Maim 11.02100 n,=w aa.W.M nIAIm i Y.m•M nlMMM — n mr.Nmaun.MMl.M 1.M,r I'Mm Idx.M )AaM LrwM 1 dd%M IdN.m n.wLw a Wlnn Wlxu.Ms Iw,M Mm IrM.m ).W.. "Mm, I .MI. 11.:N.M n M.Iu1rs]Agnr.vl nrw1. la,m Ib.m 1 W.m M.M ..w.r U av9u41MF4MIM I Y n mr 4MwlYn IaM IN,M Iw,r n IF.M, 1Nn I•W.M ),m.r I.al.m ..]am r.ln.m n.m.m naY.r 2.10 II rMnllvFa+I 1.Yliw La1,M r•aI,M I}Y,M ],W,m I,W,m I,M,M I,lar )I.r Nd MW )1 brrrM i WFA.!w W1\ry a,m x,m N.M Lm Ulm Y a,YW MUM a la I.n am Y,IN a,M N,M a.M I MIMI MIm % I.In.r114r[NIYM 1®r I.m I,w I,m 00 I'm I 1•M If on.Mw a M4 MVM aM N,m RIM II,M RIM M,M 1 M M n Nla.,Md IMIN n.M Y.r u.M ar $I.m n1,M Y nl.m UMM. — M mwWilrt.M n,M x,M u,r Y,Yro Il.m m,w n1,M a aun IwruM _ _ Y NI4 nnMMn n.M II,M 4.M u.M %.m nl.m 1 u1.M Y axrm i YrxMw lI lnl rw x,M N,M I'm o e I I u W I rw I wr rv,Y rM.1 W.uMlr ...M ...r LM I 1 1 o Y a Ir etlYx. IMmI I ! I Y I o MYl mMM I.IYrrir I.uuM ® .® ® .a. .ma.� vines ..m.w•.. Y Ixx.n i w.-0rn rw lnl uY nan.m Ie.w,m Iaa.r i.w,m LIN.w 1. 1. 1•m.w n.11[.M ` ' n 1em cFOlb !.lain I,nl,m r,nl,m .,M,m ' Irm•M a,lw,m n,:u,m x,+Yl,m 4 1014 mfWU`MM "IM'. x•M,m II,I4.M a.11l,m 11.w,m 1 11•W,M a,w.M II,m.M N IN4 nlM"W3 4ULM 6r11rM IY,IY,M ILW,M IIJI].M 4•Ill,m ILn6m II,In,oY 1Y hYnx 1 fYpAx 1.Anl,w ILW,M I,111•m yW,M I,wrm IIMM I ym.m IIS,w,M In.M.wl fl M)rw.al lrnY lW141nur1...11 I.m,M I,M,r I.W.m 1,a1,M I,m.m 1.W.M I.W.M I.Wrw 52 FM WYa d IYALIII 1,lII,M r,lll•m ZZ... 1,IIO,M WLYNI : %1•MI III,I%,mI ,II.In•wl Na.SaNa.Wmn N.I am ' • swMM U SWUM MI I10 YllaO[=4 nKN IIYf I..,MW IMYN IM-NI NI IM-11 IMM IMM MON I•M•I YNY IWI im"I IWW IIW ONIIIN M! _—• •-- —• I Im,nml Mrl�Mx IN IX[lnr I.M.W 1.W,M 1.a.M 1.1KM' (II.MI i 1,M.M (I.W.wI 1.a.M i Y,re 01 a W"lids I.W. I.M.M I.NI,M I.III.M I.M.M I I,IMW 1.10401 II.NI.w 1 FM I.M.M I.W.W I.M.M I.M.W I.M.W 1 N.a.M MIMM N.W.M IeYNI l nselleexn IMm M.M M.M M.W a.m 0 I IAM • NI.M f OMr Mnl • 1 1 INIL MVII (IKM I.M.M I.M.W I.W.w Italian : MIMM L.IAM a.M.W 1 MU XUWLI MOY; 4181.40 4M.M I.M.M I,MM I,1N.M : n.M.w AMAN N.M.W NNININIM 1 9ure el kiet NN1{0 I,a,M I.M.M La.M I,N{,W I.M.W i AM.M U.M.M U.M.M 1 O11XIIm INM I 1.eM 0.NI. M.M W,W M.M NI.M M.M I LIMM 1.M.W I.M.M 10 NON,IN—M. YI.M M.M III.M Mm M.M M.M 11 1014 MMIM. I.W.w I.YI.M I.M.NI 1.M.r I.M.M i 21.01.00 N.M.m T.a.M I! INM,I WTPX I.IM 1W IJN.w lJII.W I.M.W (U.M) U.W.w) i (1.111,M1 (ILIO.WI III.a.MI 11 111 liti,"Nris1bYly IMirem,X La,W 1.a.M . 1.M.N1 1.M.M I.M.M i 1.M.W I.M.M I.M.r 11 INblmmlNllelll 1.lA04, M.M Il.a.wl (1.11.1.0I O.M.WI : Mm.M) (1l.NI.WI IIl,N1.M1 ..I.MNln I....I. �.muvm nM.M.. r:.n_am I mmnmm IS .—t.r Isw lrm wl lr CM,W 11.516.010 AM.M IMm 1.w.W i 41AM KIM.) COLM man Is M,Yc11m 4eW M.M I.M.w I.M.M I.M.w IN.w i I.M.M IN.M l.m.w 11 IM: (meliw law .M.M W.M :MM M.M i 4W.M I.M.M l.a.r N Oft, Lam M,M MI.M M.M M.W I.M.M I.M.M La.w n IW n Mail,HOW M.w Mm M. I.IAM Mm I.M.M I.tl,.r I.M.M N 1.4.1 I M.Ils M Im M.M I.NI.W M.M nl.w I I I. 1 1.0I.10 11 Mill IN M."Wil 11 I.M.MI.M.W LM,W. a llI W NISIMIIlbYml 1 I a Mm,Mm MAII.M MM.M n.w.w 11 MU MOO[ N.M M I.M,M LMAM La.M M.M : n.M,W I.a.M MIMM IS 101n WIwUrcrol,[ n.M.W a.NI.M U.M.M I.M.M I.M.M AW.r Ar Y.M.W 11 NN m Lia cN 11mN lim LOn.w LM.M .,M.M LW.r I,m.r : Aa.w l.M.r n.M.w n O.W1.mIXIiOe snn. M.M IN.M MM W.w M.W M.W M.NO w.r n biMXlMt".It"guts • 0 29 nm4n,0[WiV Nlu,umt LaI,W lA1.0) I.M.W 1.21,11,10 LfAM i 4N.M LW,M N awr IWNi.,. LM.w I.M.M L{ILw I.M.r I.lyw I 1.151.00 LW.M 11 %111 O1MIMS LM.M I.W.w I.M.M r,M.w I.M.M I AM.M I.M.M MNS.M IS IMN,{[url'm,r Is Nt TIN II.M.W N.M.w I.M.M I.06W N.M."a i MMI.MI - N.M.MI I1.M,M1 MI wtslN,Xm... .M.XX... ..m=.X, m.XMm ;.I. . ........._ M bunm I Lur IN Y111Yr M,M a.m AM N.w • i AW 1 N.M SOON N TnutI Man KM N,M IAM M.r N IN NI{A.M.1. I'm !,M LM 1 0 i Mw I a.M a NM 1. MM AW MAN 11 1.4 NWM N.M MW am I 0 i a.M 1 2211.14111 a 101X OUSIME.10 IY.M IMUS iMM a.r 0 i M.W • IN.M n YX 111..11 mYm, I'm Mm Aw MW W.w M.M Io OLem 41NIXm .1 INN ONWMO a.M MW 1lAN MOM 0 I M.M 0 M.W 11 Nm—{M1~Y.11w 10.40 ILM M.W 0 • i 1 0 0 U ..It I—,Iq WIN bMia mil". Ar AM II.M • 1 0 1 1 11 LM 1.1.N m IYsioisl _ 0 • 1 1 O 1 r '•-1 ..n....I .nn..n... _N..a_ Miss—. I.m.a,. 2-1— .f b1,nm 1 Yr11q.r frm Y,t Iw N.NI.M N.M.W 11.11S.r 1.•MM LM.W I M.W,M M.MmI a.M.M X UILL I,NM a.M.M I.M.W I.M.W 1.M.r l.M.M I U.M.M A•n.M a...M 11 MIN IMIWL[M011[ N,LI.M MINIM will.M HIM.M l.M.w : AfµM II.M.r NAM,M N 101PL lWnMtl I.M.M 11.811m Ma1,M a.M,W U.M.M I KM.M N.M.w IN.MAM N MI—,I c.rn'0.er m YX I.0 N.NLw MOMM LW.W I.M.M (U Ml MM.M) IN.M.MI N w,1ui 101 NnN I.A.Wil1MOu I.M,m I.M.M LM.M LM.M LM.M : LM.M ..M.M ..M.M ,I "IN KIM N Mn[m n,M.w MM.M LM.M WHO (LIMON ILw.MI la.W.w) (a.N1.Ml CORM!Mimi.Opnm a.1 vam ' lMl Mall r ININm UA M • l IgaP M00IXYN IAIrOP!OCPI X4g Im IM.n Imm Iwn IXaX IMw1 am ml Im�ll lam nw NMIm IM •- -- -- 1 am.l ulr llm wl lw n.W.M A.m.M ILW.W u.1P.W 1.I11.00 ' b.M.W l.RI'm ILM,W Mimi 1 mrf H at 1.Ot. f.rx.M I.M.W AM.W a.M.W ILIILW 4.m.W N.U1.W la.xl.m 1 am I'M,M I.M.W f.i11.W 3141,W 1,III.IN If.m.W b.M.W b,TI.W 1 IN.vfltlmllWw{mW M.M q1.W III.W III.W 11{.W : 1,W.M 1 I.M.M s Mir as I Mat Bawl II.W.W n.m.W ILH1.M IAm.W ILm•W : O.M.W III.M.W 111•M.W I M4 mIMA mIM a.w.W a.ta.W II.m.W 'a..n.M n.W.M 1 P.m.M W.IH.M W.M.W ISIMIRM I MnOMR.... I'Moi U.M.M I?.M.M Wal.m u.m.M N.MM IA.m.W IN.M.M f calumm us.tlMmx Wr. n1.M M.M m.M I.M.W I.M.M I Im.W 1.M.M H.m.M ro IIW u1.111YM 1 1 it MR IWIIMm II.m.W u.m.M. u.w.W n.M.M u.W.M x.NI.M MISSION m.W.W Ix ammalw Nva Wlmr II.M.W II.M.M II.M.M f.tN.M tA11.M 1.{II.M In.M.MI IX.m.WI 11 IN Imi M mM"M I.wrmu f.IM.W I.M.W 1.130.610 a.m. 1.M.M : I'Ma" I1.M.M U.m.M 11 FM"Um or lMi.11l I.m.W 1.m.M 1,01.W I.III,M II,III.WI : II.III,WI IN.Ia0.WI IN.TI.MI Ygtfl TMII 11 W.I WT MIrw WI IM H.W.W M.n1.M H.M.M N.M.M WHOM H•W.M 4.1",m Wal.w 61m! ..�_ ... .. _�_.. .._•__ I{ tmIM11a HNY m.w LW.M I.M.W LIN.W m.m 1.M.m M.M I.M.W II Ix.: Zma M.M M.W M.M M.M M.M : I.W.W I.M.w I.M.w n qW I.m.M u4.M I.M.M I.m.w Lm.W : f.Aa.w I.M.W n.M.M n w.H tmll.1" I.M.W A.M x.W S.IA.M 154.04 : I.111.000 ..n1.M 1.IX.W n n mmi"_1aMtR M So S.m.W ...H..W .M.W a.M.W via NN a limlH a .W.W f.M.M I.M.W A IIWN MIN Nhatim 1 1 IS M,IRM a.o11.W 4Al.m 4.III.00 n MUMMI U.M.Re Ia.111.4a, I.M.M a.m.W 11M.M H,IU,M 11.111.W "S.M•M a NPI MISSILE Ma. III,IH.M IX.W.W M.W.W II.M.M N.M.m lu.m.m 11.111.04 In.m.M AXrIMp U Mn.,MH ma IMM111. U.M.W U.Iq•W Ii.M.M H.W.w II.IO.M 1 U.Ill.m a.M.M II.W,W P IIIuu1411.1w In. 1.1N.W I.M.M l.113.w 111.00 t.11s.m II,W,m I1•m.M A.M.m a Wr{uwaa W. ,MmY e e n IIrMNMiN 4pam1 I. .W I. .W 1,41.M M HM fmllam I.M.W l.m.W l.m.W I.m.W ..M.M a.MIA.M ...IN.M 11 qlr MWllmf 11.113.W a.W.M a.1x,W 11.M.041 II,UI,M Iq.IN,M H,III,M I4.m.M ._.._._ _._.._.. ._._.. .._._... a.M..... � .._. _...__. .U....._. A mrMI WN'WrYMt 1W N.IN.W H.m.W ..M.M P.mM. 4.NI,M N,1n,M ......1m I1.111.W MIM s) .......uue rn.a...... ..........�. u...u... ur.n.me mnn.... n......... a MMa 1 WNMr lry im lw I,M.M M.M M.W n,m 4.M : I,M,M 4.M mn,m Afm[ N la M I n rW Igm111.M 1w N.W U.W If.m 11M !.W ILMailIN.W I.M StMi Mir COW . ._----- ._..._._ ......... u IPN.PMI 4.W U.W u.M I.M LW uLw LW IN.RI ._ ._ ___. ...__ .. ..__._ ...__.. ._- .._._._. n ulN MlwuroM 1.10Iu.W 01.909 M.m A,w.W H.m : I.W.m u.W I.a1.M Mm1i.o n IMININIM.4Yrm W.m WW m•M I.IN.M 1,IN.W w aM faaW4rX _ __ _ _ T Talk ims ULM W.m In,M o f LU1.10i { 1.14.00 _..._ .._.._... ____ __._.. __._.... __.._.. ..._...... 4 amml Wn'WraM M.M M.M a.m 4.W 4.M 4m ,a WI Wb M M.M M.M n.m a.M S.M 11.00 4.M 4.01 I. Ni1 Nlm v lalillq e ....anon ssrznnuu amnn.rn ......ar.r.. ........:.rt.: ........... m....nrz man.:.. port Man.In la-1.Ir.Ma x mm.l tun'Wr lm Wa lw AJ11,M IIi.W,M N.NLM n,N1.W U,aLM : b•b1.M wm.m n.rx•IH .f NIx 11gM U.W.m II.N).M a.M.w am,.w n.M.m IN.No.M M.M.") MMIM .__...... ____. ..___. ......_... ...___.. ; ..__.. _......... .._....... �✓ 1I trq MIII.1. IP.m. I III. ,M M.M,W W II,M,W : M.m.M M.M.M W, W Mm1w1 4 11 M Mq.ln.M IN US 1 N.W.M N.III,M N,m,M U.M.M H.M.w : III..A•M 0.,III.m IU.III,M ._._.. ..... ........... ..._..._. ....._.... ; -------- ........... ....... 4 vaam31Wr1'm YWalm Iq.W,M N,M,W T,NI.W I1.10.M U.M.M N.UI,M 11.M.M a'M.M 0 Iv11ui.In WIN F.m wit'. $."I'M 1.91.411) I.W.M I.M.w f•M•m 1 a.m.M alm,m II,MM ._..__ ... ._ ........... ._....... ...... .... .._.__ .... 51 rM ouial a I04111111 N.m,M R14•M II,M.M II.III.M II.IA,M 1 O.M.M al.m nl.m MR InlnnM HlRHI H.A Mr/Il • mMmMmlHm rM nM n3m IrM IW-n mw t11aM InfBOOf xe.1 MH1AAN .A,Al MR." MT." IW-n Ha IM 11N-fl aMr IWI I1H- IaANr rxn MMn-A nn I Inmm 1 u..ruu na ml nu e,1x,m LHLm s,nL,m l.An,m. m.m A.w.m HAn.MI A.w.m ARRM 1 ••Ml..f It lu ellttrllon I.M.M 1.W.M le.M.M R.In,M H.IN,M ; m.w.M H,M,M M.M.M 1 I. ..M.M I.IR.M- I.M.M I.M.M I.M.M ; f.111,M I.M.M II.01.40 I NN,aI A 1IMHtax,lam M,m lwm In.M IM.m 0 : I,M,M I.M,m 1 0.,AMm e I TOM ARM R.In.M M,M,m MINI um,m M,IM.M i Q.M.M IM,IAMI IH,w,m ] MM nllMll Melee II.M,M u.w.M le.m.m IMR,m 3.111.M I M,nl,m tu.n..M I711.011,4" MMImn 1 Sits d hill 00.0 A 0 10.151.0, n.Ram I1.43,m qm.m M.M,M j tl,lll,m m,M.M 211.111.1111 I NIIM3M 3Nw e A 0 M AM,M, I.M.m HI I.M.M 1.1%. I.M.M I I.M.M H.M.M H.M.M 10 0m,EMANI a 0 11 W.M1MMH M.M.M R.M,M M.mm N.M.M R.n1.M n.m,M M.M.m M.M.M R A.I.nxl.,,.r10rzNtnx r,HI,M 1,M.m SA".M M.IH (S.M.mI : 13.OS.MI IR.W,mI (M,W,MeI 1! Na Met M rtrla NMaemlrMeb S.M.M I.M.M 1.M.W 8.115.00 I.M.M ; 1.W.m IA,M,W I1.0.0 H rm Iam 0r MIIx1) 1J10.M (M.M1 (l.M.M) n.m.ml IMMM) t (4m.Ml M.MS.m) (M.M.M) -N: wen MH01 . .. IS AMM I WN-M,rrn MR TH, 15.631.00 M R,.m n.M.M n.M.M R.m.m ; H.M.M R.M.M H.M.m AnRM 11 C-IMMe Iron m.W 1.019.m I.M.M ].M].IH mill, i M.M.M W.IM 10.111.00 11 rw; MMUo M.M M,M M,M M,On M.m i l.M-m 1.M.m I.M.M 11 Other W,M M.m HIM SN,m M.M { ].SILM 1.W,M 1.017.M I1 We of"LMRIIIMn I.M.m H.m n.W I.M.M IM.m : S.MI.m 1.931.M MRIM M Immt 1 MR11 n laze Mil.M I.M.M "M.M l.Hl.m l.W.m ; R.M.m 1,M,m 11,IIS,m 11 will his N MIVnt II f.M.M S.M.. S.M.m n II.M.MR,MjnMAl 0 0 ]I MN,MOM R.w.M n.1@.M 0.111.000 11 MM ARMI R,M,m I.M.M I.M.M n.111.0 A.m.M n.]n.M II11M.m IH.Mo.M n 101"rznIWn..Al III.M.m H.MI.m R.m.m R.On.M L.W-m i mml.m II.M,M m.SH.M \ftolA wn.ntlR 21 MO ll Rim arts lnWYI Hui IL511.001 ILIH.M IIJH.M MM.M II.M.M t R.113.M II.AIIJM M.M.m At nxrlN N11RAIM sew I.N"w S.M,m l,m.w I.M.W "M.m : ii^ws M.M 11.1101. R Nimnwl maoul IMNIN 0 1 IN nANMIH 1.11,xhnwl ].M.OM I.m.M 1.IH.m SO on.,[glv0lwrn f.IMIM I.M.M I.M.In 4.6411.011 I.nl.m ; HJI3.00 H.]IS.M ......_ _._._.. -._.._.. _ ..._ ; ._.._.. _._._... .._._._. 31 101O1 nrm11MH H,IIS.m nali.m n.11l,m 11.9n.m ".M.M ]I.Mnl,m i RI.MAn Il.nl.m w.IM.m Y Menx 1 NN'.Y WO. ISA11.m HIM.M U.M.m t1.M.M Aln.. n.M.m n.m.m ul... —M m........ . ._. u= Ass,RAINS) AS Axxrx A NnrNx Fm,tal INr Iqm Ii.M m.M N.M a.m i IN.m 0 M.. - MMF M u.LIN HI W.m M.m I.M.m I.MS.M M IMRR I nMUMAR Mm I'm 1,M f.m I.M I.m ; M.M M.M L AM ImY 1 n IOHL AnML m,m M.M MI.M I,m I.M I.M.M a I.M.M is TOTAL mImL3 M ING xe,m MI,M ylwm R,w M,M i I,rn,M A IdH,en ....... ._.._._ RMOIMo M NY FnNiex A MNRN M,M Mr.M Ml,m M,M M,M I,1N,M I,M,M 10 OW,WMIRM .._._._ ._._.. ..... ..... ..._..__ ___.. ---_..----- II 1Rn O1m1MM MI,M M.M Ml.m M,m n.m ; 1,1R.m A yH.m ._..._A _. ..—._._.. M MI,M 1 N RAN N O +M n,m HIM M,An M.M � e 0 A 0 M wI rarA 0H 9ri0a nxiN emiMLn eL,M IeLm M,m 11,m 1 0 e 0 .__.._. .......... .._._._ ll roY .._._. ___._ ._.._.. _..._._ .._.___ NNM nIMIWII A 1 0 I 0 1 A ; 0 1 0 ............ nanmm r.a,..a...- rzsa.,... .....umr ; -......... ¢I n-_..... smMr lOtim.Rr IN IF.IMIMI x TOR.A W,Mr In.INl Ntr II.I11.M IS.IH.m n.Rl.m N.nl.m R.1R.m. 1 M.m.m n,M.M M,9n,m IS MIL ARM M.131.m' ]I,n).m 11.M.m M.IS1.01 n,IH.m i IH.III.M In,m.m 1n,n1.M Y .._. ........ ...... .._._. .. .. 11 - IOIn MILAW MOIII n1.M-NI Immix, M.M.M H,xL,nl mm.m i n1.M.m IM,In.M w.M.M 11 NIAI RMnMw n.M.m M.MI.M M.1R.m u.ne.m x.M.m ; MAI.M IM.M.M M.M.M 19 ...A A(A'"or to Ae.1 Atn 11,111.M M.IM.M M.n1.M R.)Y.M R.m.m ; 1210,M 111.tAS.M3 111.113.ml M 11.1 MI I01,OIrM IYe011 IMr.R 1.111,m Lm.M LMLM I,M,m 9Jn.m : 9.Mt.m II.M.M II.M.M 11 MOINN¢tl101(llln I1.QI.M 1LIOLM 11,0I.M M,IIA,m R.m,M ; 11.111,40 IM.fN.M) M.M,MI Wan vmnY Hall Y. S UnM nANYI IS TNUN 11Y nU I'M am Iw T WWII IT}Y II OQe 1MwN IPE wFb IMi NFT IYFx 1xF11 }rwr IYY 3" ww bW •••.11.1 Nf —_ —_ —•-- —_•_,•— Amrm 14rrr Mr Jm uY rnr a.m. 1,TI,M I,x1.M f.•T,w I.M.M S 1.03.1116 4M.01 i,W,M IMW t bn K 1%1u 4lmllae 1.M,M LIY.w 2.121.41" •.b1.M wAll : II.M.w ILm.M 1 fur TI.M M.M M.M M.M M.Ib i I.W.M f.IT.w 1.W.M leurnl I Mallaam Inure M.M .•n.w M.w M.w M.M` i I.M.M M.w I.M.M 1 Olbr Imm 1 0 1 INK NW[ X.M.M 1.II1.141, LM.w I.W.M 4M.M i b.1AM AMOK A. M I INK MIMI[MIN I,M,M I.M.M I.M.M 1.MM II.M.M i U.bl.w xAl1.Y Y.UI.M WMIMSOI 1 IYn.1 ml.l brw e{o I.M.M I.M.w I.M.w I.M.M ?.M.M : u.M.M U.M.M n.M.w 1 H.U.I..I O aat I.kn. M.M M.M YI.M M.M M.M 1 Lm.M I.uLM le NNI 4nnlwm I I II 101.WIMMU •,M.w 1.W.w LIIS.M TM-0LM.Y : II.W.w U.UI.Y 9.b1.M 1i Invm I wn<eer w wl Ixr I.M.w SAW LM.M I.111Af1 Lw.w I.M.M. b.M M.MM U, I1 wt IM i In Mist .I."I,. I,M.Ib l l .w I.MM 4M,M I.MM : I.MM LM.w LM.M II fo1411mn lWltltl I.M.M I.W.w LM.M I.M.Y ZWKS I {.M.w U.M.M -.M.M W1141MI11 uavva aaa® mrvsc aaaam arvaav .—aea ••vas• n. 4erme 1 urmenr hn un lur II,M.w II.W.M 1.M.w LIx.Y l,M,w � 11.11I.M M.Y II,M.M u tmlrwnw weed Ib.M M.M su.w lu.w a.Y S.M.w Y.M I.u1.M 11 IIe; .4, 111.Y M,M I.Ib.w M.M M.M I 1.M.M 1...M 7.01. It Y4r S.w I.M I.w f.M I.Y i AM x.w Po,w 11 Lb of 1 K—Ilpw M.M ..M I1.M M.Oaa Y.M M.M Sal.. I.In.M IS 1..—,It, I. hll—1 1¢ea M.M )Y.M 41.M M.M IT.Y i LM.M Y.M IS E®14 M b Ehln[I 11 LM.Y Lw.M a.M.M IJ a.,1 n ECIII 41[Ilnel I.Mw LM.M 1.M.M v olar Ime n.M I.M.M Iv.w I.M.M 1.12SY M.M LIT.w b INK.., eM.M LW.M •.M.w ;.M.M 1} .M : Y.W.. s.IT.M b.M.M n INK.IWI1.14 1{.Mw 11.611.144, 11.611.0" I.M.M S.W.w 11.121.01 S.M.Y U,M.M iI I4n al loiet4W eruwnl llul I.M.M LIT.w f.T1.w 2.311.441 LIMM i II.M.M I.M.M ILM.M 11 NIMNSAWOOISK. I.M.w Lmm 1.0.400 $.MM 1.01,411, 12.415.414 M.M n.an.M U 4iWruml4..raweu f1.M W.M Ul.w M.w W.M I'M.M T nn.wW Iwilr edfnMn 1 I IS oMrinaedlWn 1 I 11 TOOK M.IWU I.M.M 5.111.011 {.W.M I.S. I.M.M i 21.01.4411 km.M Y.1n.Y JI Piano 1 tVr{rw Y Wt Tnr II.%I.M I,M.M 1.I..6111 I'M.M MM : M.M a.m.M t.a.w IM M001 aaasaa avamm r..uemv. •.n..a ...—.a nvs•wa awv.a mmm�a n Won 1 MrrMr fa wI wr AM U.M 11.M T,M U,w : U.M I n.M 4rtW u m 1m a.M Sam a.M a.w ss Luml llWnuuw11ss4 1.w I.Ib I.M :.w LM : 1.w 1 1.w Y Olbr Ior1 I n 111.Ilrnpl AM U.IY U.M n.IH I.w i Y.Y I 11.M IS Y14 I41Mn MYY U.w U.Y U.w Y.M AM 121.4110 I a,w IS IW 1-i.1l Nurnl AM mm n.M Aw Aw : Mail, M.M 10 OW 4nMibw 11 YOK MMINEI U.M aam 21.41111 U.M Aw : ur p I M.Ib x bwm 1 MrI O•ar 4 wt IW AM al NO U.111 AM 1 Y M IwlNI,Al lied TM1y SolkiM IS M M U,w 11.111 a.M I : I 1 1 x Iaf 41m w 1Y1W11 I 1 0 1 1 i 1 1 1 MWflxpla hr lelYlW lnelnY a • • •mm. r mv.mm _ _aa uaamn . .a Ineme I1.1T 1 Iw WI/ur n.ULw AMw IL M.w AM.w AM.M : AIN.w 41AM Milken�y 4 YIK IIrYO[ {.n1.Y 1.M.w I.IU.M Mn.M f.M.w : U.Mm ..M.M T.w.M 11 INK InIWIE N0111 ;.M.M b.M.w b.M.Y US .w ILM.M 1 K,YLM ll.M.M T.M.M 4 '14 EIMDINEl killLMM 1.M.M I.W.M I.M.M ..M.M II.UI.M n.M.w 11 "Ka""I C.~IO an"uar ILM.w AMM 10.III.M II.M.w LIY.w 1.111,M b.M.M b.M.w SO Inl lui a Op Pill.I.M,l.-uK I.M.M "M.M I,M.Y. I.w.M I.M.M i I,TLM 1.lU,M 1.131.14,11 51 M0bWtt14YEIit111 AAS.M U,,.M 1.M.0111 ItAi Wnnw LAN Rm nvx n.1 umn x a im INS ar Mille lm 1 Its-er lull Iaaa ntlMw ars m-W LHI Ill-n lm-u Its-M lnaw man tI«r ow lMall W.rMl 0ewnM rvm .._.......... 1 1 vxmxAarrrall nm un+nl Iaro,M I,u1,M rAa.M L.M.O. 1da,M I.M.M 'Aw," vnWA S fmrl[IIIIm111•urin I.MM I.M.ml I.M.M I.M.M I.nl.M I.W.M I.III.W II.M.M ] Ill M,M M,M 1.01.101 1018.0 I.M.M : IAO1.M n.M.NO IS,M.M I INAM,l gwulwa LIMA MAN Is"M Ia.M M.M f4An "I.M MASS W.M ! a1W Lmmi 1 ' a 6 IOIµ MY124 I,M,W I.M.IN 1}n.lm t.M.lm I.W.M i n.]n.em It.m.ml n.11l.lm 1 TOTAL MIAMI MOM 1.1110.01 40.M l.w.M 4.l11.1H I.M.M i II.w. 11.m1.W 34.125.00 0.100 1 fun•r JmH wn.n 10 f Am[wew L L^M nLw l. M 1, M I 1 a. a.ln.lm MAN TNM 1M M.M M'M lw.M M.M 10 AM,Nxelax o 11 wild OOMllmn I.M.M I.M.M I.M.M I.M.M I.M.M II.111.0, 133U.M 11 WxmfbrTWr b Axt lnl I.M.M I.M.M 1-611 1,1I5.01) 1.I11.00 : I.I15.M MAN M.M 11 IIt lur'[0p wild uulp"I,.. M.M I.III.M I.W.M L111.M I.M.M LSII,M S.M.M ].M.M 11 IUY IAIm•I lbll[IH W.M 111.011 111,M 1M.M M.M : Su.M (I.M.MI II.M. I .........,. .m,...... nn.,,.. IS Wxm 1 NrTnu hm LW lur LM,M 1.II7,0110 1.1I1,01 1.612.011 J.M.M 1 SJa.M I.M.M S.In.M 1xmL1 _..... �. �..._. .. .... 11 Imx' M.M MAN m.M ur,IM M.M : I.e11.M n.M 11 rm: tmmellm I.MON In.M n1.M 111.M Allow : L1Sf.M I.In.M 1.Ia.M H OWr I.Ia.M W.M ]SI,M 161.M III.M : S.IIS.M I, we n Immul TOM SIT.. n.M u.M IOI,M AM M.M m.M I.M.M a ubrW IAII]Lmm IMw 41.M NI.M 1rs.M n1,M w.M : LW.M a L. TO Mily am u 01xW1 n Len.M i LM.M Lan,M IS rle`NM MIT,liMWm I 0 0 a OtW IIw M.M .;—. ._.. .__.__.. ..._I.,.f...1a....,.M._.... _._.. i -.—.....-.-.-.-.- .mkMWkMIM11 TOTAL MW[ M M.M . _.1_1_.S_1.M. ..__MOST.. AS 1014Mlimit IMIN ..l. 11.. _.1-11 ......I.M.M i n,10r,a10 I.M.M H.ea.M 1 " uMAIAM `I TO SNi•OI MIT wN I—emil Ilxt DAMON LIMM I.I4.01, 21111.1111 LOI.M i If.M.M A.MI.M N.M. n Ouulµ MIIAUn$muts M,M M.M M.M I.M.M M.M : 1.1M.M 1.Im.M I,w,M n "i...wrxxeL",mmi a 0 M rIm•OMW Miy mh T-.A' I.m1.M I.w.M I.W.M a NOT bxmiblx • A u TOTAL MPWALIS 6611,011 2.111.01 I.M.M 3,UI.M 1.In.M : IS.m.M S.a1.M I1,u1.M ._._._ __... .._.-----_ ........ ...__. I .-.._.._ _----- .......... IS A.,.l br,—bNm INr y111.M LI11.,; .,1O,m0 3.00,10 I,M,M : I,W,M . ILW.M) ILW.MI ..... /ue w4111 .xrx.x.r. .xrrr.,,x. ............ mN.. .....,.... ..xx..m .xxx.... n Ixxxe A brrf•Wr rl wl lu, a,M 1LM e 0 0 ; kcm A w,M vefbtt a Ill INT MAN !4M WN't TO IIm11.1.11 m 1. LM 1 0 • 0 t,M a 1.M a1 0lm,IMx 11 IOIAL.MS Ie.M Y_•�a .��.I —__! -�0 WM _•W a MAN a IOIn WLWL[IMOIM M.M '•11,M '1 1 a M,M .�_1 M.M .._....._ ......�.. ...�.�... _.__... �...�._. ....H..... .�...� .._._._ OIWIIMn it leof o1SmmH A 1A4rxl ndm v.M I M.M MM w m.1 beMmIN I. TOTAL m ITUES n,M v.M A 0 a l 511.0111 1 H.M a Awxm A brrr-MI 1.ml u,1 MOM a 1 0 : a I a r! ml un'I op will rellq IlAlxmb n,M a a • 1 ; a 0 0 ...._... ........... 1 _.....� ..__._.. N uldwmm10111,I11 0 a • e 1 1 0 1 0 mwV11MhM11el lelv.MI V,MUA) mm�,. _. u. �. _.. _.. , .. nnn unnnm 11 AAN".1 turl-NAr A.,IM Iw 1.116.10 1.W.M 1.MAM 1.11I.011, IMO,M 1 7.I4.0 I,HS.M 1,14.M µ TOTAL POOM LJILOM I,If1,M I,IaLM ..M m .'NkM I MAH.M ecrei 4.JN,M J ......... ........... ._._._ ...__.... _..._.... I _.—.... ...... "AuI 11 TOTAL MUMS MOM .]..Hats tMII,I II.M.M 11.10.0m I,M.M : M,M.1M a,IOS.M 51.311.00 11 IOIk Ww11MS 5110.00 I,IJLM 5.151.0 1.I1".M S,MS.M : 21.111,01 MIMOSA H.ai ......._. --- . .__..._ ......... ........... I __._.. ........... _._....-- N IMrm 1Wr,-Nx Al Wt lul LW.M I,111.00 LMLM M10.01 LW.M : S.M.M (ele.M) IM.MI M A4l Iw i Nr"Trim 1xO1M 1I11ArnN MLM L111.M LIM.M I.III.aM LM.M i LM.M .1.M.M S.M.M ......_.._.. _.._._ ._._._. ... ... ..�.�... ...._._.. ._.... .......... 51 MI WWI m IOliltll) 1.11S.M "M.M 1.IM,M S.M.M 1.111,M : I.e11.01 (3An.M) 0.171.00I CUR" Wnnlw onnn3 w.I unm S C,MU.iwnam n9 an It.I[W IW1r MUST Im. wrcmin aS� M IW IW-P IT1.o IwM 11. ITaX YIm Y34 aft Iw•w Ww 1aW MIW IM I M—n 141n'mr rm uX 1., - l ll,M I.m w Low S.MJw '{.maw 1 41111.40 I,W.M S.M.M UUM 3 mnd 11 In ILL-11. CALM Lln.w Lll1.M IJw.M Lw.M I n.M.w COX.. U.M.w 1 M Iw.M In.W n1.M W.M WM 1 1.111.01 I.M. S.w.M Ie4rnI3 XWIYvw,lmw Wm IT.W M.M M.W W,w I I.w•W M.M w 4na 0 1 I InX IIYHX S.ni,m {M.M I.ID.M I.In.w 5.411.01 I C.M.If/ H.]➢.m H.In.m I RIX MIWU.19 I.M.w I.III.M 1•In•04, w.M.M 111.2111.0, i T.W.M 11.w1.M ".Mat nIM3Mn •__- 1 Swn e lelel4rh 110 I.W.m 1.10.w l.M.M ;W.M I.pw I T.M•w T.W.W P.M.M 1 .IT.:.".11.1.Wv Mr. MI,W MIN I.w.M 1•Iw•m 434.W 1 Lin.M I.W.W n.I13.M 11 war r.w1a.. t - a u InX PiMIMU l.M.W LKLM 1.1T.w I.W.w 1.0.040 -P.M.w MINIM w.w.M n .111w1urr14.ramt uu LMUw Lw,w s.m.m Xm.m I.M,w I Lw.M 1.m.m 1.W.W u al rm41n.,I. I.h U-M I'm" 1.W.m I.M.w1 I. LM.M I I.M.", 1.M.W 1.M,m 11 Id Ylwn(MMI To. I.M.m ..Z%M 1jw.W 3.➢I.m 1 Lo'M `,W,M LW.M .114 MIS) P mrrrll l mn'mr nn Wl Xu 22.91.0C n.W.w n.W.w ➢.m.W ➢.w.w 1 21.511.0" n.m.w 22.311.00 MUSIM .� n Iwhwit.Han 14.00 M.W m.M 112.1011, T.M 1 1.91.M T,M I.M.M P M: .,I. 1.016.0C I.M.. I.M.we 1.110.w I.M.w 1 I.M.W 1.W.M 11.M.M II wm KIM, Iw.M 177.010 IY.m ULM I w.w 1.117.14S I.M.M I. 311.a[wtln uwU W.W H.m H.M M.M ➢.M I W.W N1.W 1.M.01 ➢ WHnl 111.1L m,I. I.W.W l.M.m I.TI.w LXLW I.➢4M I T.M.w t.M.W H.IU.M 21 [wla 11Y Y MIXY.I1 1.M.m I 1.M,w S.W.m T rI.-MC I.iq Wnhml 4W.010 I LIN.w I,M.m II Xnr 1. a s' 11 MIX MEME ILXLM 1.115.00 LICLOW 1.111.010 1.w.1tl 1 11".101 I.n1.M n.nLMl T Se1X mIWU AMISS 41H.w RM.m AW.0" w.w.m 1{.Yiw ww.w U.M.m A.M. IMMUNE,, n Wad YX Wn IMSM wul l.WAll LULW Low l.W.w t.1$w 1 4➢4w 1.2111.4" u.➢l.M n CUL iu mi..Sao 111,00 1.0101" I.m.M 1.M.w w.w I %. m M.w S.W.m H CSMMM yl1We I.M. 1 1 a rlrwW ISAII wWwa1 1 1 w ew[ Mas T.m n•W n.Ml IT MIX WMIIWS I.M. 1,n},W fA.M S.I..m LIN.m 1 u.IX.m Lm.w a.m.m 32 Xww I Hr"MI IS mt I.rr n.M.w n.W.w ➢.w.w ll.w.m n.IUM UXA A.m.m aa.w me rmm IS Imnnl HrrSlnrrm Wllm l.M.w 1.1I3.m I.M. MW ULM 1 l.W.m 1T.w I.M. MEW H I.lm mm I M.M maw is harm I Si-11 w 1. Iw.M Iw.w T.M ➢.M X.M 1 M.M S.M W.MI IS err Ixm a 11 Ii1.MUw ULM am U•w ➢.w Maw I M.w to M.W ➢ MIX WIWU M. I.M.M 1".44, I.M.m M.M W.w i LM.w M.M S.M.w MO>IMI1 --••_ —•— 11 IM Iri.i.1 I hm.t M.w MIN 511.00 W.M W.w i LM.M M.M Lm.w X MILL Wm1IM1 w•w9 M.W W.M M.M W.w I S.w.M mm 1.1111.00 U 1a..n I u,mw Y mt w "M,M I'M.w ww 10.00 M.M ; MJM 1 1 U m1.wi,Ixl.Xw lr.LX Wl1.m1. 1.M.w u rmt wlw.Imlutl '— 1 .. ..._I 1 1 ; �_a a •—_ S.YI(wblw 1.nW-rW IwlnU ` W1.Fr.I.l lm T,M,W n.M•w ➢.m,w ➢•i➢.W n.Wal I T•M,w 11•214.010 T•w•m V 4 MIST MM[ U,M.W I.M.m I.w.w I.M.m 1.m.m I 11.W.w w.W.W M.M.M 11 I04 WIMI[Www U.IM.M "m M.M.M Il,lll.m U.M•M I a.m,w ➢.M.W U Ink IWMIMU I,IU.W Ip1.w 1•W,m I.PS.W :W.m M.41•w US.m 11•40•01 U mu,.1 Wn<.r Y ml w ➢.W.m P.M.m y.m.w n.W.m II.M.M I U.w.m a.m.W ..TI.M w ml Mi%0 laid lWi9 Sm11.M. 1.m.M 1.1H•M l.Ill.w }•IM.m ?.M.M i Lw.m S.M.m 1.21,W 11 MI4YRtlIMW11 ➢•UI.W St.wl.w ➢•M.. P.M. ➢,SkM I ➢•WM 4.M.01 4•m•W man Wnnle INmn». a rill., y ,r 4 n11➢al n woaam rm nm tF - 6 nr4 nm llwn Ilmo!n}w Y]nour atJ WM lY! INMII INr-Y IM`N INFN 11RN }wr lelll I11}w W.INI Op111R NN I II4nn 1 Yn]'wr rn.Wt Wr LT1,M l.m.w LrY.M law M.IW a !}1r.w IxM.MI xw.W tlTft ] W[lal 1%Ill lllelltbe a.m.M a.M.w 2.0.0 1.w.M xW.W i IIA.M a.Mw D.IIRM ! Im "M al.w W.W ]4,M 211.41111 : Law I.w.M 1.11I.0 1 leYw114mllum Irene IN.w In.w w.M 0 1 : MISS, a w.M ! ols.11.l.l a a 1 1e14]t101i xW.W I.W.M E.M.W xw.w xNxM : p.W.w ».M.w D.MA» I 1014 AWwN mi. I.M.w I.M.w I.M.W xm.M I.M.M i Y.M.M mntW n.IU.w 1 Iun el am,YK{S I 1.W.W xm.W l.M.W xpl.w J.»IAN u.ow.W ».m.W N.YLW ] bllulln all.I I a eal mw wn. 14M W.w M.W I.M.w M.M I 1.M.M ].M.M I.M.M 10 OW,la»w6w I 0 a 11 w4 a1MI1M] 1.111.W I.W.w S.w.M I.M.w I,11).111 1 ».M.m Y.MW Y.M.w Il wmmlw Diati411w 1.M011, I.IY.M n1.M (IY.0W U.M.IIU : a.M.WI IU.W.WI IU.D{.wl is Ill bu'f Om hmi IWiN ami'mm I.JY.IR I.W.M a.w.w a.m.M ;M.1R I E.DI.M I.nAw ].1Y.w 4 NAW—IYlbUl 0.0 110.4i'I II.Iw.MI U,M,W) (LW.IM 1 IL1Y.wl II1.M.WI 111.4}.MI mi. 1] Inlrm 1 alr' •Irn wl lur I.T1.M I.III.M 1,w.M I.M.M I,M.M I I.M.M ..IMm I.MM .. Imam II Nnle4wm 4u4 IY.M IN,M I»,M M.M 11].M : l.W.M IY.M 2.415.411 II IM: [Iw[Yle M.M 2.M M.M M.M Mali, : I.w.W I.M.M ➢ OW[ N.w Y.M Y.w Y.M N.W : M,w 110.4111 M.M N Ub e1[w[Iry tlwe TI,M 16M It,w m,M n'm 1 LN{.M I.IU.M E.]IL111 b muwl 111w1t.I® NLM m.w M.w M.w w.M : tM.M W.w l.M.w ]I S.M WI u ehtrin II 11211.14, I.M.M 1.2111.40, a 11.1wtI]bpl. 111.011 1111,411" IU.W ]I Mn 1. IN,M I,M,M S.W.M I.M.M : M•MM 1.110.011, D.M.W ]I 1a141tram 1.I».W 1.M.M xN1.W ],W.11 {.UI,M : II.JI{MI I,IN.w 11.0.1111, as IOIw IWIW It M41K n.w.W N.M.W D,M,w D,M,M U.311.41" I 111141.411, D.W.w WMIWa 11 fW101101e1 Wn1 lmlwslYel xM,W LW.w 1.Iw.M LIM.w l.W.w i MM.w xW.W 11AI.010 21 etnrin uuvmn lnue M.M M.w S.M.w I.M.M I.m.M nJY.w IJR.M 111.24.1411 U bY4[uml Nrlwll lelwu 150.01 IU.M T naWM[wiry Ypelwl 0 a Y OWrin..— W,W II IY4 MMINb I,w.M xm.M 1.aLw 1,w,w tnl,w a.w,W II.W.w D.M,M at bume 1 Yrpnlr b Ytl Ilu I,TLM I,W,M I.M.M J.M.M 1.lY.M : I,W,M I,Ia,M I,U1.M ll ImO Mnn ,onvmn nentnun .,., nnnnnn .,._:nu wnu44 Ynnnar :[nnrtm ...... L wlrm 1 YrTwr Iro Wt nv »,w I1,41,11 II,W I.M 1 : a.w a U.M ImaK ➢ lu len Y.W a.m 13.014, Y.M II.W : M.W M.M U lewnl l nlMlllvn Iwn I'm 1.011 I.M a I : am 1 1.011 U Olw law !r 101b MM[ Y.M w.W Y.m W."I U.w i »IAII 1 M.W D 101.WLUL1"WIS ILM D.W 4.4111 65.411, U.W mm 0 aI.M IIMOIMN ... ➢ SabiW1Yllle1nn1 T.w N.w w Illy(eawlunl I 11 W4 OIa01Mi! »,M N.M Il.w MW 11.M i m.M 1 DI.M a blwf 1 Cls O r Le uu wr O,W .I,M a.M 1 1 i 0 _• -_0 a IS Im1.'a bI Ml.IWIN Iwbw1Y II.W 14.1101 I.M 0 I N !M bIIM n INlbitl l I 1 a a 1 I 1 mUUall, nUUg::ze mill 14611.11r lim-1.lrwiwl I1 Wum116urv0en lw Wl lw ILM.w Ia.W.w 1.m.w 1.011.011, LW.M U.M.M 1.I10.11, II.M.M w IWL Krtrvt S.Ill.w Mli.M 1,M,M 1,116.0 e.W.M I 111.811.441, D.W.W ».M,M 4../ U 101n AVI1WL!]MIK II.M.M U.w,W ILIILw 11.»I.W IS.M.M ! p.M.M 55.511.111 IB If1AL M[IOIINO I.M.SY 1.111.61" IO,IY.M ILW.W 16M.M 1 0.111.41, II,NLW w.11].M 11 lummAhYP0.n ie un fur Mw'M 1,W.M ......M I,IU,M 1.m.w i I.M.M Ia.W.wl IILW,MI se wt uu'1 ory NriY Ia4i4 W➢will I.M.M I.M.w a.M.w 1.M.011 1.W.M i 1.M.M 1.616.440, sl M>Imft 0110!!I[III 1.W.M I.W.W M10.44al 1.M.M Wfffl i ^Im.wl (1].M.W) (N.M.MI COUNTY SANRAITON DISrFuCTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA February 18, 1987 1 e E evmfuE REF #796 ea BOX e+n ,o MNVo .rau Aeer 27 viMMa I+ STAFF REPORT PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE REVISIONS The Districts' staff and legal counsel are proposing revisions to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance to incorporate recent requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) , to clarify certain provisions and to simplify and streamline the administrative and enforcement procedures. The Ordinance regulates all industrial and commercial dischargers in the Districts' service area through its permitting and enforcement provisions. This preview report provides preliminary background information, outlines the proposed changes, and presents a tentative schedule for reviewing and adopting amendments to the Ordinance. History Recognizing the need to control the quantity and quality of wastewaters discharged to the Districts' sewerage system, the Boards of Directors adopted the first Ordinance regulating the use of the system in February, 1954. This Ordinance was amended in February, 1958, and again in April , 1970. The 1970 version formally established the Districts' Industrial Waste Division for the purpose of issuing permits, setting flow and quality limits, and monitoring industrial discharges to the sewer system. Effective July 1, 1976, the Ordinance was expanded to include heavy metal discharge limits. On July 1, 1983, the Ordinance was again amended to include enforcement of the EPA's cate- gorical limits and to modify the cadmium, copper, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides , and total toxic organic discharge limits. Summary of Proposed Revisions In 1986 the staff and legal counsel began the process of reviewing, updating, and drafting proposed revisions to the 1983 Ordinance to clarify certain provi- sions, to simplify and streamline the administrative and enforcement procedures, to incorporate tse. EPA regulations that have been promulgated since 1983, and to incorporate recommended changes and additions to the Ordinance from a routine audit by the EPA, State Water Resources Control Board, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The procedures followed to amend the Ordinance in 1983 and proposed for use now begin with staff and legal counsel reviewing the existing Ordinance and 1 drafting the proposed revisions. The proposed changes are then reviewed with representatives of the industrial community and the regulatory agencies for their input. After all comments have been received, the proposed amended Ordinance will be presented to the Executive Committee and then to the Joint Boards of Directors for consideration. The proposed amendments now under review by staff and the General Counsel 's Office fall into six categories: o Additions and changes to definitions to help users interpret the Ordinance. o Use of concentration vs. mass emission rates in establishing permit limi- tations as requested by EPA. o Incorporation of other EPA recommendations to strengthen the Districts' authority over conditions of discharge and utilization of enforcement compliance schedules. o Incorporation of connection fee provisions adopted by Districts 1, 6, and 13 since 1983. o Clarification of calculation of excess capacity charges. o Review of the policy re local agency exemption from sewer use charges and connection fees. Schedule for Amending Ordinance The tentative schedule for revising the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance is shown below: ACTION ITEM COMPLETION DATE 1. Preview conceptual Ordinance revisions with Executive Committee. February 25, 1987 2. Complete draft of Ordinance revisions. March 13, 1987 3. Review with, and incorporate where feasible, comments from industry, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and EPA. April 30, 1987 4. Review with Executive Committee and modify as directed. May 27, 1987 5. Consideration and introduction of proposed amended Ordinance by the Boards of Directors, and modify as directed. June 10, 1987 6. Second reading and adoption of the amended Ordinance by the Boards of Directors. July8, 1987 7. Effective date of changes. September 1, 1987 2 CPT:labI1 2/19/87 ( STRINGFELLOW TRE"'N NT DISCHARGE REPORT JANJAR .x17 SAWPA EPA2 Permit Limits CSDOCI Pretreatment Standards for Stringfellow at Stringfellar3 Industrial Use Ordinance for New Electnoplater Peak Daily Discharge Treatment Plant State of California4 Maximm Allowable Sources Maximum Maximm Allowable Discharge to SARI Primary Drinking Concentration (mg/l)** Concentration (mg/1) Concentration (mg/1) January 1987 (mg/1) Water Standards (mg/1) Arsenic 2.0 N.S.* 2.0 L.T.D*" 0.05 Cadmun 1.0 0.69 0.054 L.T.D. 0.010 Chromium 2.0 2.77 2.0 0.010 0.05 Copper 3.0 3.38 3.0 L.T.D. N.S. Lead 2.0 0.69 0.58 L.T.D. 0.05 Mercury 0.03 N.S. 0.03 L.T.D. 0.002 Nickel 10.0 3.98 3.51 0.004 N.S. Silver 5.0 0.43 0.43 L.T.D. 0.05 Zinc 10.0 2.61 0.7 L.T.D. N.S. Cyanide (Total) 5.0 1.2 1.2 0.05 N.S. Total Toxic Organics 0.58 2.13 0.58 L.T.D. 0.33 5 Flaw, Gallons Per day Total Monthly: 1,026,000Total 1,026,000 Avera�Production: 48,857 Permit Daily Limit: 187,000 * N.S.: not specified. ** mg/1: (milligrans per liter) is equivalent to parts per million. *** L.T.D.: less than detectable 1 Effective July 1, 1983. The CSDOC industrial control ordinance entitled "Regulations for Use of Districts Sewerage Facilities" provides for the enforcerent of EPA Industrial Categorical Pretreabnent Standards Win they becona effective. CSDOC enforces the standards that are most restrictive. 2 Federal Register, July 15, 1983 pp. 32463-32487. These standards became effective April 27, 1984 for non-integrated facilities, and June 30, 1984 for integrated facilities. 3 Stringfellow monthly operating report, January 1987. EPA Region IX. 4 California State Deparbrent of Health Services, Sanitary Engineering Branch, Primaryy Drinkingg Water Standards, June 1983. 5 This value is sun of limits for endrin, lindane, methoXychlor, toxaphere, 2,4-D, 2,4,5-D, silvex, and TNfk. s RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11, 1987 - 7: 30 P.M. �.J 1 NF�1NU NO .}w-9 - JI u16T WOI.KINL Ctl I14L PPOf ESSING DATE 1/29/Ul PAGE 1 w REPORT NUMUER AP4S _ COUNTY 1ANITA7[ON UISTFICTS OF ORINGE COUNTY q' CLAIMS PAID 62/14/87 I _ _ WARRANT N0. VENDOP AMOUNT OESCMIPTION �I CP4115? F(FIIU FATALE, INC. 5172.47 STEEL PO4b54 - AA< CLEAN 172.02 RAGS UNA355 AAFAN ONCONSTR III MARTS S187.02 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES F. V' )H455G ADVANCO CONSTP UC 7GP c, INC. H6,095.10 EDGTKAETIR )-) 7b4357 ACPU COME, INC. f312.30 ENGINEERING/REFINED EMISSIONS MODELING a1 RNA35P III COLD SIMPLY INC. 1292.46 ELECTRICAL PARTS D 0E4555 AIH PN ODUCTRCHEMI 0 FCORE.AL TNT. $1,"55.66 CATIONIC TBA.IHENQ/PLANT 2 ..._..._..__ M C84'.60 ALLIED PHOG CHEMICAL COPE. $3,264.58 CATIONIC POLYMER .".. f71 OB1362 ALLIED S f1.26A.31 SPECIALTY GASES 2 Otl9362 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. SB33.31 VALVES j n 114111 DLL IUIC CHEMICAL 39d,180.32 CHLORINE 1 PN43f4 AKLO ICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH $62.20 ALARM REPAIR ' C ,• '--' V94.65 AMIPICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 1216.71 LAD SUPPLIES m 0645E6 ANAHEIM SEWER CONS7MVCTION $14.318.49 EXCAVATE A REPAIR SUDSIDANCE-GIST 12 I :Z 764367 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. i1,651.23 MECHANICAL PARTS OP " Ci4368 A-FLUS SYSTEMS 31,11L7.39 .. __ _.. _. CLA5511`IE0 AQREBTLDIHQ. 1 00 7N4A69 APPLIED SPACTR USCOFY 624.00 SUBSCRIPTION00 COA371 AQUA BAN CORP. $2$190.80 ANIONIC POLYMER 7 (}J 1 ?A4372 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD.. INC i190.80 LAO SAMPLES M9TEflIM,S PA4372 ASSUCIUSTR LAPORATORIO 196.10 LAB SAMPLES D Ob4374 UC CON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, E f196.10 EQUIPMENT REPAIR r 104,175 FALCON DISCOMPUTER Sr SERVICE $7I$256.63 _....__._..__ . SLUICE SUPPQSAL... 9999992 r OR4375 1!MC SAFETY SFpp $477.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES O GN4377 L.P SAFETY F SUPPLY .5$22.89 SAFETY SUPPLIES CL "Cp PP4377 L.Y. PAMI6 TRACTOR Y IMPLEMENT 253.17 EQUIPMENT PARTS 'I UN 379 BEVC E"GINCERIN6. INC.IC i253.17 EQUIPMENT PARTS 9P4379 NEVCC INDUSTRIAL VEHICLES $303.05 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ?64361 RIOCY[ E 153.57 INSSCRIPTIONTRUMENTATION 111; f1 PB43N1 BL<CA HOA COMP i153.51 COMPUTER DISK ON EQUIPMENT 1 N OP13M2 POLLNO NEM DATA MAINTRNA NCE ,177.93 COMPUTER NG7 PMK CLEANING C i UA4364 PROWN 9 CALDWELL CORP f35$277.50 ENGINEERING 7-7 UN 43R4 PSUWN 3 CALDWELL .395.62 LAB SUPPLIES 4 • ?Y.43P6 JUDYN 3 CA Lf.WELL [OHAUL TI Nf. l39r39 R.D2 ENGINEERING MILEAGE U i 2br3N6 JU OY tluCHFN fie.tl5 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE CP43A? P.UCKEYE GAR PROOUCTS ESC.59 PROPANE 3MASf9 PU44f ENGINEERING CO. $1,155.92 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �. P043f9 WILLIAM 11. PUTLFN $353.69 PE77Y CASH CA45P6 C L P AACCHU171UNING CO. S920.dO PUMP REPAIR LN4391 CAb1ACT HAAOYAPI MFG. $112.72 HARDWARE ..P4392 C4L-CHrM SALES $117.62 SAFETY SUPPLIES LP4!43 CAL-f,LA4S FUR lf'SUANCH, INC. 5667.82 LAB SUPPLIES - 7I4344 f.AL7POL . INC. $57.79 REGULATORS ':N9f9Y CNCL. INC. 1231.36 TRUCK PARTS n A439F JOHf. CAROLLO fN6l Gr I:MS $171.145.26 ENGINEERING PI-20,J-I5,P1-22,P2-28 T N4397 CCNI[L SYS7f KS 12.A39.5D COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ^h43?F CIIEPWES7 10DUSIBIES. INC. f21,U]T.?4 FERRIC CHLORIDE ... _.... . . r:` . I D � G bUNO NO IIINO - JT DIST WI:NKIVI; CAFITAL FROCE551NG DATE 1/2-lb? PAGE 2 A RETORT NUMBER APO .. . . _..___.__. COUNTY SANITAIIDN DISTAICT3 OF ORANGE COUNTY / F CLAIMS PA 10 12/V9/07 WAPPANT I40. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION t ,fry U84'F9 CMIVFON U.S.A. , IP'.C. $2.343.90 GASOLIN.UPIL 0 F.4401. GOLF SC IC NIIFIC, INC. 114.gfi LAB SUPPLIES f B94f1 COPPASS L4 NUSCAF I. f910.00 LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE i > T' OD402 CONGER FNEILMT LINES I105.58 DELIVERY SERVICES 084.63 CAL MAT $217.39 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL S644G4 COFILPLIPATED FLECTNICAL DIST, $I•J52.56 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL _ ['644U5 CGN9OLIUAIEO REPROGRAPHICS 5176.76 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTION m 5e44;6 CONTINf FIYAL DISC. CORP. $531.35 MECHANICAL REPAIR M 604A57 CONVEYER COMPONENTS CO. 51.791.28 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 2 GB44DO COOPER ENERGY SERVICES 145.97 MECHANICAL PARTS .. _._ t7 eh4.99 COUNTY NHOLFSALf ELECTRIC f1,31A.52 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES - n 464414 CAL WATER 1223.75 EQUIPMENT RENTAL C+ .... G@g411 LARRY CURTI TRUCK L EOUIPMFNT f26J.O0 EQUIPMENT RENTAL --I 104412 STATE Of CALIFORNIA 616U.00 PROCESSING FEE/ANNEXATION 164 DIST. 12 _ yi FFI CP4413 STATE OF CALIFCRNIA $360.09 PROCESSING FEE/ANNEXATION 167 DIST. 12 'g OLA414 OKh TRUCKING 16230.00 _......... __.... . DELIVERY SERVICES... # '3P4415 OMF, INC. $1,587.01 ENGINE PARTS OD VA4426 OANIFLP TIRE SCKVICC $1.091.67 TRUCK PARTS : G; DL4417 JUL LIE ALMEIUA f950.D0 PROF. SERV./ESTABLISH COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEIL-_b RH441R OCCP 51.232.73 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES a n CR4419 DIAIFC POLYMERS $16,459:26 CATIONIC POLYMER ' c. r 9tl942U OlF ILIPFO ASS OCIAIE5 4531.98 OFFICE SUPPL TES. 1- PN.421 nISPOSARLC WASTE SYSTLMS, INC. $237.92 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 1 C ONg422 DONAR ELECTRIC, INC. 454.710.53 CONTRACTOR PI-22-1 P-: 064421 DOMADO CNTENPhISLS. INC. s6.1]1.90 INSTALL CHECK VALVES-PLANT 11 In 384424 UORP-OLIVEP, INC. $792.91 EQUIPMENT PARTS -I CA4425 GUNN 104AR05 CUFF. $155.68 PAINT SUPPLIES ;CY 084426 NILb EH EADS $115.00 _. DEFERRED COMP DISTRIDIRION _ n C1,14.7 CASTRAN. INC. 1q•473.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES --4 ON442n ENCn AIITFR. INC. f1.5OO.nl1 OCEAN MONITOR Cn 0bgi25 ENLINELAS SOLES-SEPVICC CO. 53.494.6J PUMP MOTORS [P.4[0 fNVINONMENIAL RESOURCE ASSOC. 1223.00 LAB SAMPLES `X J84g31 MARSHALL FAIFRES 5345.OD DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION a L {{( PP.4,32 FARM SALES S SERVICE s215.40 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES j P4433 PE OCR AL EARMF.Be CORE. A7A.00 DELIVERY SERVICES PG.434 (ISCHIA A PORTEN CD. 1374.12 TRANSMITTER Cb4435 F140:11 SCIENTIFIC CO. 1121.77 LAB SUPPLIES _.. ..... _. .._.__.._ ' 084436 FLU-SY!TEMR 4A54.36 PUMP PARTS OP4427 CELI,Lk PUMPS, INC. 159.56 PUMP PARTS 0P.43fi CLIFPORO A. FOPKEPT 43,921.50 ENGINEERING/RIGHT OF WAY IMP-PLANT It. :P44311 NONALO L. FOX K 45FOCIATES f1,650.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT k AP.ggn TnF i0M11 nR0 CO. $112.55 DELIVERY SERVICES + L I•P4441 FRLUSON 1196.11 TRUCK PARTS .. ._. __ 11b4442 G.M.P. COPFANY $51.74 TRUCK PARTS . 9Pepp3 GIAAPL EUMPIM CO. 157.4.69 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL ! UP4444 CAS ENFP I'NUDCCII' . INC. 15 J28.00 WOOD SHAVINGS ...._.. ... i N a A tj.IFUND NO ni'I" - JI 6IS•1 NONKINC CAP'IIAL PROCESSING 04TE 1/24/M7 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 .. . .. ...... ....__.._ C^UNTT 9ANITAT1UN OISTRICT5 OF ORANGE COUNTY A I.' CLA InS PA In J211 /A7 •I WARRANT NO. VI NLOR AMOUNT GESCq IPTION .. ._ ......._...p lil .. ......, _.__ CA P NA 4q5 CAIES L I NGLASS ICO.PLLE03 .175.72 MECHANICAL REPAIR s aH4aqu GF 11C hAL TEIGPn Oflf CO. s2.175.72 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES 1 .i JR 444E GICRLICH-NITCHFLL. INC. $17.443.00 MECHANICAL PARTS { 64 I'I nP444P HA CH COMPANY 4632.06 LAB SUPPLIES VS444P 114L5 It P. HOGGAN. INC. 7269.93 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ..!. CP44•-3 JRED P. HARPER $1.275.60 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION � :�d 4644P•1 H4RNINE7ON INDUR7M14L PLASTICS 1464.E4 MECHANICAL PARTS "I ORWL2 S. A. HEALY CO. $8.429.56 CONTRACTOR it-23R - - -_.;i '•' NR4453 K•OOPfN CAMERA STORES 4126.56 CAMERA/FILM CS Ub"51 HOPC A. INC. $2.975.61 CR7IONIC POLYMER _ - i C 00.455 HOUSI' IF BATTERIES $64.90 BATTERIES a CP4g56 PUNTINGTON SUPPLY $723.96 HARDWARE A) 164 AST ISCO COMPANY $20.273.09 I$CO SAMPLER _ T :S44EN IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 1N.533.41 FERROUS CHLORIDE 36.4g9 INDUSTRIAL THREADtU PRODUCTS 4714.53 HARDWARE Q 3 .P844f. INGAAM PAPER 1296.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES # O84411 INILPNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE $166.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00 I4402 GLINN D. JAMISON $1,175.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES/UNDERGROUND TANK COMPLIANCE O 1 P446. 55 3 INCTNF JA TOR-3 SMOPPF SA11. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1P4464 JANV S. NC. $76.19 LAB SUPPLIES i 'I D 71.4,10 JONES CHEMICALS, INC. 12,521.74 CHLORINE S '� r Cf 41fR KAP,h 6EANING6 B SUPPLY 41.2U B.T3.. ..._ _MECHANICAL PARTS [4F4AA7 KEENAN SUPPLY 91.396.79 VALVE - E 0-44EM KCLLY PIPE CO. 12.791.91 PIPE SUPPLIES C Q• C VM q4£9 KLN-S OIL, INC. 1IJ2.50 WASTE OIL " W CH447•A KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. 4137,740.43 CONTRACTOR J-6-2,J-15B-2 - -_ --I OH 4471 KING HEARING, INC. 12,129.35 BEARINGS/MECHANICAL PARTS ' Q A DPA472 DONALD E. KINNEY 1B20.00 _.. . PEFERREP EGNP PIVA.NYVIDN_._ C1 604473 L.H.U.N., INC. $24.00 WELDING SUPPLIES 11114474 LEE L NO CONSULTING ENGR. $4,023.00 ENGINEERING PI-23R, PI.14K / P2-31R (g N (.84475 LISBTING DISTRIDUTDRS, INC. $35.69 LIGNTIN,G _ ' -0-476 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMM $250.00 LAFCO PROCESSING FEE/ANNEXATION /68 Gi6T:/z_ CH4g77 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMM. 4103.G0 LAFCO PROCESSING FEE/DETACHMENT IT DIST. A14 L✓ I)4.47b 1U51 RE-COL 1396.86 PRINTING O q14 A.J. IYNCN CO. .519.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES _ -- ------- H41h. M.G. INDUS7RfES t1S9.92 TESTING EQUIPMENT/SPECIAL7Y GASES - l✓ n N4.N1 M. PLTRVO t ASSOC., INC. $340.20 FNGINEERIN HICHELSON PUMP STATION CM4hP HFS fllf.fO PHOTO I•^ ERVICES I; CH44!.J MAIN FR4H[. SERVICES 47.919.0U ClCI RED BOARDS �. OP44H4 MALCPM PIRNIE, INC.. S44.269.67 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTING _ I•d ib4gmb -Al SITE CONSYFOCTIGII. INC. $624,247.76 CONTRACTOR PI-21, PW-061R-1 A PI-22 :� 1P44NA MA'IVAC FLFCTRONICL $111.62 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES . � IP44117 MATT - GILON, INC. t637.59 CHLORINATION EQUIPMENT PARTS ' .. . ... . . n No4hA MCMASC04-CARD SUPPLY CO. tq 17.R6 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CO, H.4E9 MESA VTOLIOAIL LI WA LfP 46.00 PR USAGE aN•qLl MILL TLS PF IL TL'FY fey.it PRINTING ING I .n -LFUNC PO 91-1 JT 0!iT W9PNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/29/87 PAGE 4 w c REPORT NUMBER AP43 .. _._._. C(IIMTY SANITAIIOM BIPIRICT$ OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS P419 i?/J4/87 'I NAPFANT NO. YERGCP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION I` GP.4991 MR+L 14FFTY PPfi IAh CC5 CV, C1.913.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES ____.- - `• ' CF 4492 BORG AM LOUT AMI NT CO. $457.83 TRUCK REPAIR - 144493 MORLEY-2IEb4FTH L AI FFR H15.b47.4J CONTRACTOR P2-31R CPg49q MOTOROLF, INC. 1192.62 PAGERS/PAGER PARTS 04491 NCI' COR ip P. 31.751.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 'y .4 G NATIONAL LUPREF f462.12 HARDWARE „I :4"91 N6UTPBN 3225.01; CATIONIC POLYMER 3. rP..49h MONTH CEM7RPL CNGF. $57.62 NSTRUMENTATION PARTS R Ca4 g 9q OCCIDFNTAL CHEMICAL CORP. 12.)26.05 CAUSTIC SODA -, Z UN95CU OAANLE COAST ELLCTRIC SUPPLY 15,275.13 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES "1 G PN4yJ1 ORANCE VALVE L FITT IN6 CO. 3i13.Bi PIPE SUPPLIES D IN 95a2 ORITCl COP.P $338.61 MECHANICAL PARTS Q-•' 9a450 COUNTY SANITA71ON DISTRICT $1.382.12 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE.FUND --I 1845t4 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $111.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES/INSTRUMENTATION PARTS 3 aP45:r5 PACIFIC BELL S829.24 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES L' PL g51E PPRIS UNLIMITED S1.271.45 ._.. . . TRUCK PARTS -_. ._..._ # 'P 45.17 ROY •LNOEP.CRAF7 $415.0C DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION + w rRg!.?a PHOTO s SOUND CO. SA-17.64 COMPUTER SOFTWARE ;to•;:5 FOPOWA VALLEY EOUIPHCNT 117.892.0G CONTRACTOR 5-28 t • , OF451'. AOWFR SPECIALISTS. INC. HBO.1 2 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0.0a51I FREFF.RPET PERSONNEL AGENCY $771.45 TEMPORARY SERVICES I� T- g512 QUEST INTL. MOMITGR SERVICE $1,661.24 EQUIPMENT REPAIR E r 84.13 RNn ENGI14FEPIN69 INC. 18.293.00 ENGINEERING 1-15R C aP 51g R.A. BLED ELECTRIC S1.452.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES In �;• ObA. IS 111[ RCVUELIC SUPPLY CO. $550.97 PIPE SUPPLIES - - - ------- Cn I44516 PEANORU GAS DETECTION DIV. 1756.30 ELECTRONIC CONTROLLER G19F17 AICHPPDS, WATSON. DREYFUS$ 33.b62.05 LEGAL SERVICES ' L'. ` PP491N RICOH CORP S1.320.00 COPIER MAINTENANCE � ve4p1? NILOM CORPORATION 1669.24 COPIER LEASE 4!844P2 THE RITE orRFECI]ON CENTER S292.59 TRUCK REPAIR �• I'! CO 0t4521 PO.CHVATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. S131.98 VALVE PARTS I" "Fa'122 R00ME GA7A SUPPLY. INC. $457.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR A R84523 JOSFFM T. RYERSON K SON. INC. $1,592.42 STEEL 064521 SAE LIFE INC. $838.60 -. BATTERIES -- -- -- - ---- �� 944!?5 SAN JOAOUIN CHEMICALS. INC. $877.09 CATIONIC POLYMER' • :'Hgf2F SAM. INC. S677.00 FREIGHT CHARGE ••� LNP?7 SANCCN ENGIMECRINC . INC. S280.21 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 194P2M SANTA ANA FLECIRIC MOTORS S187.03 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES r N4424 SANTA FF SYSTFM.S COMPANY 1329.23 ENGINE PMTS �- •'� 104E11: Sr% COAST OFSIT-NE 1I69.30 OFFICE FURNITURE --- j"! .IM551 SaANPOCM SUPPLY $219.39 HARDUARE "I VP4532 SNI1P-EMLAY CO. 114J.40 SOIL TESTING I24E3I SOLAR IUHPII.ES IIIIENDAIICNAL $1,173.02 ELECTRIL SUPPLIES C Ga E34 SO. [OAST AIR nUSLITY CA S5.2I4.D9 APPLICATION EVALUATION FEES u$4535 SOU111LRH CALIF. EPISOM CO. SI6087.33 POWER Lb9E36 SC. (AL. GAS CO. 419.571.97 NATURAL GAS i � D " • IUNL NO 11'1'i - JI LIST VORRENI CA' 11AL FPDCLSSINC DATE 1/29157 PAGE 5 A REPORT NUMBER AP43 j'• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OPANGE COUNTY �. i•� CLa EMS N11D O2/.14187 S +• Y AFReKI NO. YC NIAfi [NOUN( OC BCP IPTION I`1 "( :C4b37 ^RUTOCPR COUNTIES OIL CG. $8,137.1c DIESEL FUEL I'N.53R SFAFKLLTIS 4RINRI46 WATER $964.11 BOTTLED WATER E r III 484539 ST[N IDOL A SUPPLY CO. t1,32i.17 TOOLS ' 18154A THE SUPFLIENE 52535.19 TOOLS/SAFETY SUPPLIES I'•� L•RI541 SNEETLINO CO. $279.55 PIPE SUPPLIES I1-AF92 TAP IAKAMENf $9.120.06 LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ;RASU TIIOP PSON LACO@R CO. fNLM PAINT SUPPLIES 11 ITT ONISIA IRO CEL AAUT 1239.99 ENGINE PART. ZYNAS[5 INWCA 8 INTO SSON. INC.INC. f31447.77 TRUCK PARTS 1 f3 O095A6 J.G. TUCKER L 54N. I $410.18 TRUCKHYDROGENPA SULFIDE CYU NPERS , I7 PFAS[7 UNITED DODGE ARCE f$97.54 TRUCK PARTS ry1 D A6A5AN UNITED PARCEL 5lPYICE 197.51 DELIVERY SERVICED G Pk,t49 V.^.C. VSIING 13.617.25 DIGESTER GAS TESTING 3PA£54 VAR SCI CITIES 13,F17.23 LAB SUPPLIES 3 Dd45.1 VALLEY CITIES BUf PLY CO. 14.7U.20 PIPE SUPPLIES II4{' I 60A532 V.w. LIP. OF CINC. 1A.097.20 MECHANSAFETY GM PARTS 1,1 W 6NA533 V.V. WARREN INC. f172.19 SAFETY SUPPLIER I1 GNt:S♦ WATER Ye OLLU 1 CO. ilr$76.32 WORKERS COMP AOMINSTMTION , Q I 1 Dk AS55 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 337.80 PUBLICATION " 9FI'S56 VCATIICO 1 MIND ANALYTICAL ENT. 1333.00 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ` 96A557 Yf.T COAST IILY TICIL SHY. .871.52 LAB SERVICE Q ' r PHSSP YCSI FAN STATEPACIFIC EDNIFHE MI CO. .. $3A.N71.32 _.. _ _.CAUSE r 4£1554 YE6'1LAN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY iP,911.33 CAUSTIC SODA fNA561 YC SU ERN 14, A eAVIL f511.98 WELDING SUPPLIES , O�. Fy NMI561 WIIIC, FINE 1 Vf RVILLF SNSO.DO DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL $TYPY._- . ..... .1 004562 P DARNING DI VICES SI,492.18 TAG.1 ROURKE 6RAf63 POURRE t WOODRUFF f .6 . LEGAL SERVICES L) ^ = ^65EIA TEROK CORP. $2 f2e648A0.72T2 .COPIER LEASE/OFFICE $NPP.61E$ . .. ._.___._.__ --I fNM19 KLRRI CORP. NG i1T9.67 COPIER LEASE 'I � "ekF66 PNIS WING 1k9.E& EMPLOYEE MILEAGE •" N !89567 P.M.r CONTROLS ANDF P. /132.E6 CONTRACTOR PARTS `.I 98456R 21PF.INTH RNU ALPE. SA$1.104.47 TEMPO LV SERVICES P2-30 [ 12-2&1 ,i ^YASL9 EZitRI iC.PGNANY PERSONNEL Llr$76.66 TEMPOMRS SERVICES V 1 ^k1570 EPI[ C. JOMNSON -T6.6B_ DIRECTORS CORP 6 MILEAGE Cn ' I TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/11/87 $2r2A0.315.11 L 1n F,�l 3; 6 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/29/87 PAGE 6 w 7 •- REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS COUN7Y SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1 z .t. CLAIMS PAID 02/04/87 a ^•• SUMMARY AMOUNT i tf +� 11 AGO FUND 6 8,280.00 - _------ /2 OPEN FUND 6,354.10 12 ACO FUND 3,458.75 /3 OPER FUND 2,503.37 YYI 13 AGO FUND 37.43 � n /5 OPEN FUND 4,556.80 Cl PS AGO FUND 18.197.00 FFI 16 OPER FUND 206.84 ..I /7 OPER FUND 13,961.47 Y /7 F/R FUND 78.209.73 e �--, /11 OPEN FWD 915.11 /II AGO FUND 2,672.30 f1l 014 OPEN FUND 400.00 ®- i 3 114 AGO FUND 22.00 1566 OPER FUND 6,536.97 •'i 3t 1667 OPER FUND 3,473.72 W JT BEER FUND 319.767.89 + CORE 1,704,179.37 r' I SELF FUNDED WORKERS CORP. INSURANCE FUND 4,954.44 ; f � D JT WORKING CAPITAL 69.358.18 + w' T s tv $2,M,o45.41 U t I: 1. I to • ` FUND TO 41gg - JI LIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2I11/87 P AQE 1 I•I MLFONT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CO UN IT '(J I'I CLAIMS PAID •12/I8/87 F WARRANT NO. VINE-OR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION i L7 164'F9 P-VICE) $552.39 TAPES ' •I .E499C ACCU-PRINT •N COPY $387.22 PRINTING OB1591 ACE ORAFERY CO. 1195,00 CARPET REPAIR 084592 ADAMSON INOUSTRIEE. INC. $1,138.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES -- C6.5.3 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. f350J6 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES { C31 L.I IR4594 ALCT GLASS 1175.6E TRUCK REPAIR t 0f 0195 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $28.35 ASPHALT REPAIR f Z .In% RLLFRCIN PHARMACEUTICAL 53.914.89 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ! I C7 004597 AMFRICAN COMFRFSSOR PARTS $1,706,60 ELECTRICAL PARTS I n LP499A AMFRICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH $60.00 ALABB REPAIR I - ?64f99 ANFPICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 5423.22 LAB SUPPLIES Q ..ice 1.8.F09 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 1268,03 PUMP PARTS r FTI DB46G1 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES GROUP $97.80 TOWEL RENTAL 3 PR4&,2 INTCL6FF VALLEY EQUIP. 56.033.49 TRUCK PARTS /!I -it4P1RG3 A-P L6S SYSTEMS 1549.36 _________ . _ .....CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING !0, 0846C4 ACUA BEN CORP. S3.411.72 ANIONIC POLYMER O84E05 ASSICIATEO CONCRETE PROD., INC 53.771.40 BUILDING MATERIALS Q 984606 ASS^CIATEO LABORATORIES . . 1?19.90 _ __ LAD HAM" u846C7 FALJ ON DISFOSAL SERVICE 125.265 85 SLUDGE DISPOSAL ' IfD' 0846CR RRW SAFETY S SUPPLY 1477.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES c� r C84f99 REACGH SAY ENTERPRISES. INC. 1403 DQ _._ __.___—AUTOMOBILE MAINTENANCE Id t84613 bFCKMAN INSTRUMENTS 112.140.70 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 0846!1 FETCH STREET EMPLOYEE BF.NFIT $643.67 PREFERRED PROVIDER CHARGE-SF HEALTH FLAK �.Iy, O84611 OITI CONPUIFR PRODUCTS s290,92 OFFICE SUPPLIES _-- .1--1 C64613 DOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $42.40 TRUCK PARTS 384f14 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $9,902.26 ENGINEERING J-17 �. I^' Ary of lS IWFNA PARR LUMHER L HARDWARE s710.81 _. LUMBER .I� 084f76 XU ILPIN6 ME451 INC. $184.40 PUBLICATION Cn 484617 WILLIAM H. PUTLFM $215.20 PETTY LASH vD !,H 4fib CPT CALIFORNIA, INC. 527,149,40 OFFICE EQUIPMENT INIIMTENANE€ EoxT99r_ C84f 19 CS FEMFANY s5.943.24 VALVE _ CN4G20 CA EFFLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 540.45 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT l5 , j � Ctl4E21 CALTROI . INC. s612.23 PIPE SUPPLIES uB 46^t CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION IT 1650.00 C.A.S.A. MEMBERSHIP -' 6b.125 CALLIHAN♦ MCIIUNE S WILLIS - STUB.00 LEGAL SERVICES (/ AR4f24 MORTIF CARTER CONSTRUCTION ;5.692.40 CONTPACT90 7-IA L• 184in CE4TPF 9PANGS INC s15,131.62 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT C84626 CEUILFY LAMINATORS INC. s2.305.69 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT N) IP4627 CIIFMWIST INDUSTRIES, INC. S32,864.70 FERRIC CHLORIDE LP412H CHEVRON U.S.4.. INC. 1P,923.07 GASOLINE/OIL Ptl+G?' CH.VY LADNIIPAMAT 225.73 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT Q} i•R163; C'IURCH f.NSTNEFFING, INC. s99'.28 ENGINEERING 5-19-93 .. I54631 CIRCUIT ONE 1119.84 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT A0463t CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 329.51 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES R.8+f 33 CONSUL IOATFP RFRROGRAPPICS S3,43B.97 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTION 9, 634 CONTROL Os7A C6gh. 1229.60 INSTRUMENTATION REPAIR v I ,IA R N w if UXC NO 911;0 JI DIST MOPKI NT. CAFI7AL E DATE 2/11VtlT PAGC 2 R .. .. I'• REPORTPORT NUM NUMOEP 4F43 C AUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY r� LI CLAIMS PRIG 32/I6/87 WA6hAN7 N0. VF 4UOR AMOUNT DESCPIP73ON 7f<• e ON463b CONTNOL OCSIGN SUPPLY 1IB5.75 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0H 4656 CON]POL SFFCIALISTS+ INC. 1811.40 VALVE (;' 084537 COOPER ENERGY SCHVICES 6053.80 ENGINE REPAIR . .. ^� 084038 COSMGTAUNTC6 COMPANY CORP. $1.948.44 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT .b4f59 LOST& MESA AUTO STIFFLY S505.18 TRUCK PARTS • ; D AN464D CAL WATER $310.75 EQUIPMENT RENTAL m Oh.f41 OAVIS-8NCWN CO. 1471.70 REFRIGERATOR.& MICROWAVES/PLANT R2 OPERATIONS ^R4f42 TOM CAWCS 118.70 MEETING EXPENSE i� C1 Z 084641 DECO 1211.5R ELECTRICAL PARTS � I a 08.F44 DEL, RAY CHROME $0.26 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 484645 OIATEC FOLYMERS f9.466.52 CATIONIC POLYMER 0 184646 DICKSON$ 4186113 VALVES m PP4647 DIGITAL CSUIPMENT CORP. f91+00 PRINTING SERVICES nN4648 DISPOSABLE WASTE SYSTEMS. INC. f6.l11.4] MECHANICAL REPAIR . F✓ � ^ 3 684649 DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. S9T6.D0 CONTRACTOR - VALVE E PIPE INSTALLATION PLI.162 i if 7P46F5 DREXELPROOK [NCO. $194.92 FILTERS 00 08.01 EASTMAN, INC. $490.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES i 0 L-� 1 P6.652 LMERSON ELECTRIC 4630,111 - REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT II Lb4653 FEDEP4L EXPRESS CORP. $66.00 OE LIVERY SERVICES n U6.F54 FIFCHf.A L PORTER CO. si.356.31 PUMP PARTS � • Tr K04655 FLUYO CUN SERUCT E ON CO. CONTRACTOR P117 A§ tswfi FOTOMAT LARS $2.053.62 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT i 084657 FOUNTAIN VALLEY LOCK E SAFE $P8." LOCKSMITH SERVICES O UF465H FOUNTAIN VALLLV TAANSM TSAI Off 11126.09 .. TRUCK PARTS ... ..... _ A 1 1'8Sf59 THE FOXUORn CO. $470.16 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES •I A 1N4bf7 TMF fPAO0P0 COMPANY $923.89 ELECTRICAL PARTS • U. 094661 F'RICK,-GALLAGHEh MFG. $891.63 OFFICE FURNITURE . . _.. ._.... 0e4662 CITY OF FULLERTON $31.26 WATER USAGE 1 --1 ON4663 GEN-G-LITT PLASTICS CORP. $1.475.52 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS (% I' N PO4A61 CEAEPAL TCLEPNONC CO. $4.571.03 .TELEPHONE NFTWORK CHARM 004665 GIF4LILR-NI7CHCLLI INC. 126,307.43 CONTRACTOR-CONVERSION OF HYDRAULIC LINES I OR466E RICHARD A. GIGLIO $84.84 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE O I ; Pb46E7 GRLAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. $250.80 TRUCK PARTS _.. •YX.IFA 6AEFh ecAF.S ROUIIE HOMf S732.18 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ER4Af9 V. MAYHLIN $20.16 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE W '•' 10,4 f.75 HEALTH VALIET PFG. S59.90 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT __. ...._. L; 110.671 HOUSE OF BATIERIFI S741.24 BATTERIES h 1194672 P.B. HU iHE$ CO.. IHC. $630.17 SAFETY SUPPLIES 10 j 118467E CITY OF HUN71NGTON BLACH $18.11 WATER USAGE .. ._._ 484174 NU4I .4GTON SUPFLY S7405 HARDWARE i 4R4675 HTOR BTLk 15.85R•N5 OIL .) 684676 ITT CARNON ELECTRIC 12.3E0.27 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT _ I•j V84177 INPFPIAI. WCET CHEMICAL 51.9n2.9A FERROUS CHLORIDE j 1644711 INCUSTRIAL THNCADED FPOGUCIS $767.73 HARDWARE '• 9b4679 I41.e60 CMFI4E CoUIFMF.MT CO. 142.29 TRUCK REPAIR _ k44..fO IRVINE RANCH WAI£h DISTRICT f?T.Ib WATER USAGE 1 i . V • W 0 FUND NO 9199 - JT OIST WORKING, CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2f11/07 FARE S. 1 REPORT NUMBER AF43 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' 3 � i CLAIMS PAID 32/19/87 WARPANT NO. VENOON AMOUNT RFSCRIPTION I co 00 4 6R1 IRVIAE RETAIL FAOFFPTIFS CC. $956.96 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT _ I � 16A642 JVH ENGINCCAING INC. $4.532.90 CONTRACTOR 3-30 L r$ C846X5 JOLLY RnOFP INC. $418.46 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 904f.gq KAMAN PF.ARINGS K SUPPLY 1917.71 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 04kR5 RAS SAFETY PRODUCTS $130.28 SAFETY SUPPLIES �mo OP460E KAY-NAY. INC. 114209 COMPUTER REPAIR - PLANT 2 jd ITT PNA60 MI NO BEARING. INC. $1,860.56 BEARINGS/MECHANICAL PARTS Z Il If AM HNEK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES iqq.TB REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ORg689 L.p.R.S.. INC. $35.43 WELDING SUPPLIES n PMq A9f LIZ LEARN 1262.44 MEETING EXPENSE �• , .--i 904691 LENNER PHOTO, INC. S147.00 FILM PROCESSING 0BAt92 LIFFCOM•SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY 189.F5 EQUIPMENT REPAIR ' M ROINS LIGHTING DIRT RIBUTORS, INC. 1228.43 LIGHTING 3 PA4644 LILLY TYPESETTING $11,283.70 PRINTING _ m 094695 HAF. LINGSTROMI INC. A5.957.50 _ _ Eli/ENGINEERING fQNWlilllf. - � � PPAt96 M.MPG. INDUSTRIES 11.769.14 SPECIALTY GASES ' 06g 697 S $122.11 FILM PROCESSING II ub4t91• P1IILLIF MALTFI PMD 42111}150 TESTIMONY FOR SCAQMO HEARING C84699 MCKC RNA INCA. I EQUIP. SS.529.76 PUMP PARTS n U8v7D0 MCKIMLEY EOUIPNE9T CURP $314.46 TRUCK PARTS ©g r 084701 MOMASTLR-CARR SUPPLY C4. 94q.21 _ _ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES __ 9 bCVA702 VERGES CRANE CO..OPTICAL 9991.86 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT _ !' -8A764 POR CAN CRANE CO.. INC. 3991.81 TRUCK REPAIR SEC ^Hq 70q NCLCO s1$151.68 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT I- 08.706 NEVPCRI PLATING s151.88 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT -- A D8A706 NCRARK - � F CS f26.92INSTRUMENTATION PARTS OPA707 CITE OF NEWPORT BEACH 9.00 WATER USAGE ORA76q O.M.S. 6 . TRASH DISPOSAL y 879 OHESSA ENf1NECNIN6 37.851.90 INSTRUMENTS9B471 .LL OIL co, 129F. REECHO USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT AAq 71 1 CRINGE (CAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY 3792.57 ' ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES � -- j 09A71P OKANFC COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 1963.43 HYDROCHLORIC ACID A 8g113 OSCAR.S LOCK S SAFE s6g.30 LOCKSMITH SERVICES n60714 DVFPHEAD DOOR TO CF ORANGE ETY $135.00 WILDING REPAIRS ' 081715 COUNTY OF ORANGE 321.57 MAPS U% Fb47I6 COUNTY OF GFANEE {RFISBQ.FQ SLUDGE DISPOSAL i t b-717 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 112.507.61 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND C84718 FACO PUMPS S1.145.79 PUMP PARTS U.7 9b4719 PACIFIC RELL $26.05 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES G 84 720 PAS 71 UNL IAT TEE 11.553.71 TRUCK PARTS 064721 PC I "LI iF CORP $17.358.C6 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT DNA 122 FFTF::FR 12 I. $99.70 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT _ ^0g723 IrIICTC X SOUND CO. $2,134.94 OFFICE EQUIPMENT PH-724 000CLAD LSPlNA7E6 INE. I1.57A.67 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT JX4720 PULY-IAINLF 31.2C3.00 CYLINDER MOLD _ 90g7PF PBRIFA HOILFR SFRVICF . INC. $661.66 BOILER REPAIRS I i i 4 w tz A ' FIAIO NC 9159 - JT LIST NDRYINL CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE R111/07 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I" CLAIMS P41D 02/18/07 YARPAOI NO. VEN609 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION +:C I•84727 POSTMASTF0. $500.00 DEPOSIT/BULK MAIL PERMIT N0, 498 I PN42M FOSTMASIE N 12 OnPOSTAGE 070 POWEd SPECIALISTS. INC. I S655.F7 ELEC TRICAL SUPPLIES ( -73 bAkGt PkIMROSt ICE 33000 ICE OE4731 RAFFERTT .. ISFOSAAT ZONAL TRUCKS 489.54 TRASH PARTS +� S , 094733 RATN6RY DISPOSAL CO. .581.71 ELECT DISPOSAL 084734 R.A. REED ELECTRIC 13$309.36 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES +I m 084731 ROALAYLTER TECHNOLOGY, INC. s309.36 REFUND SOFTENER - PLANT 2 T77 AP 4736 ROCKYELL SYSTEMS. IbC, at f13423 .50 REFW10 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 1^^^{{{ C G84737 ROf13000 SYSTEMS. INC. I235.50 VALVE I� 3a OP4737 JO.t F.PM T. NYFR50N E SON. INC. l$49.60 STEEL C% tL R84136 SAP ON E INC. 449.A0 FREIGHT _. rl C8474C SAW ONENGINEERING • INC. 319$315.77 MANHOLE REPAIR - DISTRICT 5 V m C84740 SHAMR ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $151.90 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES L04742 SHAMROCK INDUSTRIES SUPPLY 3194.90 TOOLS -I 3 C84743 SIERRA CALIF. S776.53 BOILER REPAIR 3t i'8.744 SOUTHERN CALIF. E01 SON CO. $25.lR 1.58 POYER .nFe N9 50. CAL. GAS CO. TI4.646.25 . - NATUML GAS -+ 1 C84711 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. &12.391.62 DIESEL FUEL G114746 STAROY STEEL 1497.33 STEEL , 6 3- n84747 STAR TOOL L SUPPLY CO. 32B5.A6__.. _.. ___ .. ._ ...TOOLS.._ Ile" r 08474R STERLING OPTICAL 397.60 SAFETY SUPPLIESrOU4T49 SUNSET FORD $137.61 TRUCK PARTSp L84750 THE SUPPLIERS $253.01 TOOLS.--: OF4751 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. $394.83 SURVEY EQUIPMENT 1P84752 TECHAETICB FIVISIGR 1453.11 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENTP84153 TEAM AM COMPANY $263.92 LAB SUPPLIES 4B4755 TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT NT CO.• INC. 34.516.00 METED PARTS C7 4t4755 IRAFEFL CANTFOL SFPYICG INC. i$15.13 TRUCK PARTS f84757 INDTRA CFI TRAL 352.00 _ .AIIR FR PR00VCTS04757 7FAVEL TRAVEL 3332.00 TEM FARE0847'p.9 TROC 1REAICF CO. 32.863.95 TRUCK PARTS REGULATORU04759 TRIILK R AUTO SUPPLY. INC. 55.191.3E TRUER PARTSCRATER J.G. TUCKERDODG R SOb. INC. 3$71.80 METER PARTS L847f1 1U51At OOOGF $61.04 TRUCK PARTSC647E2 U41TEl 136.64 GASOLINE0847A.3 UVIIE.D PESTER SCRVICE $290.00 DELIVERY SERVILES J84765 UNIVID VEFHACK ELFYATUF 1290.40 EQUIPMENT PARTS P84766 UNIVFRSAL NECK t124.49 TRUCK PARTS PF476F UNIVFRSITY SALES E SERVICE 443.20 TRUCK PARTS V.G.C. 1. � LB9767 Y.G.C. TESTING $e•$33.67 LAB SERVICES 11S YF476F VVN SCIENTIFIC 473.96 LAB SUPPLIES _.. . 184773 VAILFY CIVICS SUPPLY CO. $3.473.9E PIPE SUPPLIES A84171 YAIY( SE NAPLES. INC. 1415.99 VALVE - v n84771 JOHNWAIL A. LtUrIO 1304.20 ODOR CONTROL IEDA CONSULTADVERTISING ._..... - Gee172 V11t N.F OLI Uti Ox CONTROL ilB 4.nO CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 4 lb V1 FUND NO 9159 - JT DISI, WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2111/87 PAGE _ 5 REPORT NUMBER AF43 ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY fy'. CLAIMS PAID J2/lB/87 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION l 094773 M.S. UATSON COMPANY 61.4A2.15 - PUMP PARTS TR.774 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER s4.464.W4 - NECKAR ICAL PARTS ' Id C64775 HEIR MINK. N.A. AIR DEPT. $726.10 LAB SUPPLIES /•• C84776 _ U`ST COAST ANALYTICAL SAW. S750.00 LAB SERVICES :84777 WESTERN ADHESIVES 111,431.09 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 76ATTI, WESIEPO STATE INIMICAL SUPPLY a6,511.49 CAUSTIC SODA 0847" WESTERN DIRE L ALLOY $4.533.35 PUMP PARTAELDIN6 SUPPLIES n CU4700 WHITE-CUBE CONPORATION $1.326.15 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT n' (847P1 WRAY KF CORPORATION 125.950.10 - REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 1 C ' m A54702 XEROL CORE, 9670.76 COPIER LEASE d 0847P3 MORRIS PING 4176.50 MEETING EXPENSE ---------- _ Q n I TOTAL CLAIMS PAID PP/18/87 $665.199.33 m i3 rcger_gmcq_epee . 00 CAL 1 i 1 SUMMARY ANOINT 3. !2 OPEN FUND - - - 4,014.38- 1 I • r /2 ACO FUND 1,145.66 /2 F/R FUND 14.67 IO /3 OPER FUND 18,m4.61 ' '--' 13 AID FUND 7.067.35 Cn!. 05 OPER FUND 14.875.96 �• � 30 /7 OPER FUND 7,740.48 - - ---- - - - -- � '� /7 F/R FUND 193.92 Cl III OPER FUND 6,379.38 -LiC III ACO FUND 11696.50 014 OPER FUND 23.18 I /5a6 OPEN FUND 1,482.15 /516 ACO FUND 996:� .H 1768 OPER EMU 280,546.75 82 V JT OPEN FUND . I06,486.4J ' CORE - -' - SELF FUNDED WORKERS CORP. INSURANCE FUND 13.859.18 JT WORKING CAPITAL 199,802.83 $665.199.33 I . u I - I BID TABULATION SHEET Bid Tabulation Date: February 10, 1987 Contract For: PURCHASE OF WOOD SHAVINGS/SAWDUST Specification No. P-096 SUPPLIER AMOUNTS BID 1. Artesia Sawdust Prod. , Inc. Gardena, CA. $5.25 per yard 2. LBR Corporation 5.50 per yard Long Beach, CA 3. B.P. John Hauling Anaheim, CA NO BID 4. 5. 6. The term of this contract is for one (1) year beginning March 15, 1987 with an option for a one year extension. It is recommended that the award be made to Artesia Sawdust Products, Incorporated, with an estimated annual cost of $78,000. i Li Lea - �..� Senior Buyer LL/s "C" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT: a ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFOONIA Im Ew&AVFMIE PO W.DIV EWMYM vauF.CAUE(WwA 9VM812; February 18, 1987 910ee2.2A11 MEMORANDUM TO: Wayne Sylvester, General Manager VIA: Bill Butler, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Purchase of Cationic Polymer, Specification No. P-097 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, February 17, 1987, for the purchase and delivery of cationic polymer for a one-year period beginning April 13, 1987. TABULATION OF BIDS IS AS FOLLOWS Estimated Cost Estimated Annual Vendor Quan. (ibs.) Per Lb. Cost 1. Allied Corp. 14,318,200 $0.049 $701,591.80 New Jersey 2. Diatec Polymers 18,500,000 0.0385 712,250.00 Illinois 3. American Cyanamid 17,407,400 0.0446 776,370.04 New Jersey 4. Aqua.Ben Corp. 23,207,500 0.078 1,810,185.00 Orange, CA It is recommended the award be made to Allied Corporation, low bidder, for a one (1) year contract period beginning April 13, 1987. Current provisions are set forth to extend the contract up to four (4) consecutive one-year periods. The total estimated annual cost of $701,591.80, plus sales tax, is based on furnishing 14,318,200 wet pounds of polymer at a unit price of $0.049. � V Ted Hoffman TH::s/wy ncu Co6'?=E 'Sc� \.d Blake Anderson, Director of Operations „D„ AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D" RESOLUTION NO. 87-18 APPROVINS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. J-15 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C' AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-15 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x NUMEnc, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Oman Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed project is a portion of the previously-approved Master Plan Report for the Joint Treatment Works. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15069 of the Districts' Guidelines, a --) Final Environmental Impact Report covering this project was approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors on July 10, 1985; and, Section 2. That the project for construction of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines LTplementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, for construction of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, are hereby approved and adopted; and, "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" Section 4. - That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Cade of the State of California; and, Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts- Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1987. �.a "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Six 6 CONTRACTOR: KIEWIT PACIFIC COMPANY DATE January 27, 1987 JOB: ELECTRICAL RELIABILILTY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-6-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (4educ4) $ 7,785.65 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefore, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 RELOCATE TRANSFORMER The contractor was directed to relocate the 75 KVA transformer in the Foster Power Building. The location of the new transformer was shown on the contract plans. However, the new transformer was physically larger than estimated in design and would not fit in the space shown on the drawings. The cost of the change order includes labor and material to reroute the conduit and cables to the relocated transformers. (Reference FCO i8 and 910) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 4,015.80 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 3 Calendar Days Item 2 TRANSFORMER PULL BOXES The contractor was directed to provide and install pull boxes for the two District-furnished transformers being installed in Power Building "A". The new transformers replaced old existing transformers in Power Building "A". The District-furnished transformers could not be directly connected to the existing conduit and cable as indicated on the drawings, due to the fact that the new transformers are constructed differently than the old transformers being replaced. The contractor installed pull boxes to facilitate the transformer connections. (Reference FCO /9) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 2,367.85 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 3 HEAT SHRINK TUBING The contractor was directed to provide and install heat shrink tubing over bus connections and all open copper bus within the new motor control center (MCC) at the Foster Booster Pump Station. The copper bus connectors were not specified to be insulated or protected. The heat shrink tubing is required to prevent salt air and sulfides from corroding the copper. This item covers the additional supply costs of the specialized heat shrink tubing installed on the unprotected copper bus and connections. (Reference FCO A7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,402.00 LJ TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Six 6 CONTRACTOR: KIENIT PACIFIC COMPANY DATE January 27, 198 JOB: ELECTRICAL RELIABILILTY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-6-2 TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 7,785.65 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 3 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to* the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract plus the 3 days time extension granted hereby. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no _ time extension other than the 3 days approved herein is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original on ract Date December 31, 1985 Original Contract Time 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date December 31, 1986 Time Extension this C.O. 3 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 91 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 456 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date April 1, 1987 Original Contract Price $ 1,838,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1 1�808.25 This Change (Add) (Dedus%) Amended Contract Price $ 2,007,593.90 Board Authorization ate: March 11, 1987 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: ons uct on manager KIENIT PACIFIC COMPANY ACCEPTEDY: APPRO :BY: Contractor Engibeering "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS 7-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO, Five CONTRACTOR: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. DATE January 27, 1987 JOB: INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT OF CENTRIFUGES WITH BELT FILTER PRESSES T PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-21 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Peduet) $ 8,423.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item I PILE CAP DEMOLITION AND ALTER DRAIN LINES The contractor was directed to perform additional demolition of the existing pile caps for the construction of the new filter press facility. The concrete piles had to be lowered further than shown on the contract drawings in conjunction with modifying the layout of the piping for the filter press drain system. The drain system as shown on the contract drawings could not be installed due to interferences from the concrete pile caps. This change order item includes the combination of additional concrete demolition and piping changes required to complete the installation of the drain system. The additional demolition and piping alterations were made due to the fact that the existing concrete pile caps were not oriented per the contract drawings, (drawings were made from old construction plans) . The concrete pile caps were underground therefore, an accurate determination of the location could not be made until after the start of excavation. (Reference FCO #6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 7,166.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 30 Calendar Days Item 2 REROUTE UNDERGROUND CITY WATER LINE The contractor was directed to remove and replace a portion of an existing underground 3-inch city water line at Belt Press Building "C" . The line had to be rerouted because the valve and hose bibs would have been partially buried in the concrete for the sludge feed pumps. Also, the water line which was at a shallow depth, could be damaged during construction in the area of the line. (Reference FCO #7) ADDED COST ihIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,257.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 8,423.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 30 Calendar Days "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE .FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Five CONTRACTOR: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. DATE January 27, 1987 JOB: INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT OF CENTRIFUGES WITH BELT FILTER PRESSES T PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-21 The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract plus the 30 days time extension granted hereby. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension other than the 30 days approved herein is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract ate January 21, 1986 Original Contract Time 550 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 24, 1987 Time Extension this C.O. 30 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 60 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 610 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date September 22, 1987 `...� Original Contract Price $ 4,618,000.00 Prev. Ruth. Changes $ 4 This Change (Add) (9edaet) Amended Contract Price $ 4,672 Board Authorization Date: March 11, 1987 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: i Construct on Manager MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. ACCEFIED BY: APPR F EO'.,BY: Contractor Director of Engineering "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of'2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. One 1 CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE January 29, 1987� JOB: ADVANCED PRIMARY TREATMENT CHEMICAL ADDITION FACILITIES AT PLANT N0. 1 Jo No. P1-28 an DV PRIMARY TREATMENT CHEMICAL N I S T PLANT NO. 2. Jobo. P2-36 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (8edust) $ 1,469.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 REMOVE UNDERGROUND CONCRETE - P1-28 The contractor was directed to remove a large section of underground concrete which was in the path of a 6-inch drain line being installed. The 6-inch drain line is for the polymer tanks installed at Plant No. 1. The contractor provided labor and materials to chip out concrete which was not shown on the contract drawings and partial rerouting of the new pipe. (Reference FCO M1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 712.00 �✓ TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 2 INSTALL TEMPORARY POLYMER SYSTEM - P2-36 The contractor was directed to provide labor and materials to make a temporary installation of the polymer system at Plant No. 2. The polymer system was partially taken out of service in accordance with the contract. The District's Operations Division determined that the system needed to be temporarily reinstalled to treat unexpected increase of flow into Plant No. 2. (Reference FCO S2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 757.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 1,469.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE O?)SR 0 Calendar Days "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER �.,.� GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. One 1 CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE January 27, 1987 JOB: ADVANCED PRIMARY TREATMENT CHEMICAL ADDITION FACILITIES AT PLANT N0. 1, Job o. -2 and ADVANCED PRIMARY TREATMENT CHEMICAL ADDITMN ES AT PLANT NO. 2. Job No. P2-36 The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original ontract ate November 14, 1986 Original Contract Time 150 Calendar Days Original Completion Date April 12. 1987 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 150 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date April 12, 1987 Original Contract Price $ 910,800.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (BeduEt) $ 1,469.00 Amended Contract Price $ 912,269.00 Board Authorization Date: March 11, 1987 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: Construction Manager ZIEBARTH AND ALPER ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY: 711 contractor "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT N0. N/A C. 0. NO. Nine 9 CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE January 25, 1987 JOB: INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT BELT FILTER PRESSES AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-2 -1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (8edust) $ 12,001.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefore, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 REMOVE PIPE AND FITTINGS AND REROUTE PVC LINER The contractor was directed to remove 8-inch pipe and fittings and a tank in the tunnel between Digesters "I" and "J". These items were not shown on the contract drawings and had to be removed in order to install new sludge piping as shown on the drawings. Also, a 2-inch plant water line and a 3-inch polymer line feeding existing centrifuge from Vormittag tunnel were rerouted to provide safe walkway clearance. (Reference FCO #27) , ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,925.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 2 BASE SADDLE SUPPORT AT SCRUBBER The contractor was directed to furnish and install a base saddle support at Scrubber "L". The saddle was required in order to install the duct support at the 54-inch elbow adjacent to Scrubber "L" . The configuration of the original support shown on the contract drawings was incorrect due to interference from an existing carbon filter tank. (Reference FCO R28) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,945.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 3 PLANT WATER PIPING AT PRESSES The contractor was directed to modify the newly installed plant water piping which serves the five (5) new filter presses. The piping modification was made to conform to the piping at the existing filter presses, in addition to providing larger, needed capacity for the wash down water at each of the five (5) filter presses. This change was initiated by District Operations Department and designed and recommended by the Consulting Engineer. The work consisted of removing previously installed piping, valves and fittings, and repiping to a new configuration. (Reference FCO B29) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 8,131.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days 1� "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT N0. N/A C. 0. NO. Nine 9 CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE January 25, 1987 JOB: INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT BELT FILTER PRESSES AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-28-1 TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 12,001.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is , therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract ate February 24, 1986 Original Contract Time 450 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 19, 1987 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 450 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date May 19, 1987 Original Contract Price $ 3,747,747.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 93,554.20 This Change (Add) (Dedust) $ 12,001.00 Amended Contract Price Board ut on zation Date: March 11, 1987 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: Jx�`+- g Construction Manager ZIEBARTH AND ALPER ACCEPTED BY: APPROV x ontractor Director of Engineerfng "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Four CONTRACTOR: MORLEY - ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE January 26, 1 887 JOB: REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY BASINS A, B, C, H, 1, J. K. L, M, N, 0, P AND P - J P - 1R Amount of this Change Order (Add) (gedwGt) $ 1,738.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 REPAIR BASIN "L" SCUM TROUGH PIPE The contractor was directed to make repairs to a broken outlet pipe which serves the scum trough in Basin "L". The defective pipe was discovered during testing. Repair of this pipe was not shown on the plans nor was it known to be defective. The additional work included labor and materials to remove and reinstall the fiberglass baffles and repair the broken pipe for the amount of 1998.00. (Reference FCD #10). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 998.00 �✓ TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 2 CONTRACT DELAY (SANDBLASTING) The contractor was directed to shut down the sandblasting operations due to excessive sand blowing in and around "C" Headworks. The request came from the Districts' Operations Division who reported excessive dust in the air and buildings. The work was stopped for a period of time until the wind changed direction and finally subsided. The delay to the contractor amounted to $740.00. (Reference FCO Al2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 740.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 1,738.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER V - GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Four CONTRACTOR: MORLEY - ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE January 26. 1 87 JOB: REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY BASINS A, B, C, H. I, J, K, L, M, N. 0, P AND 0 TREATMENT PAT NO. 2 - JBN . P2- 1R The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential casts or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME rigina Contract Date July 1, 1986 Original Contract Time 390 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 25, 1987 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 390 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date July 25. 1987 Original Contract Price $ 2,443,500.00 �...� Prev. Auth. Changes $ 43,238.00 This Change (Add) (AedaeL) $ 1,738.00 Amended Contract Price $ ,488,476.00 Board Authorization Date: March 11, 1987 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: nn ma �C.. onstru tion manager MORLEY - ZIEBARTH AND ALPER. A JOINT VENTURE ACCEPTED BY: APPROVE B n ontractor Urrettor of Engineer7ng "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ' P.O.BOX 6127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 02708.7010 (714)862-2411 February 25, 1987 Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 2 to Engineering Services Agreement in Connection with Design of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following Addendum re Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20 with John Carollo Engineers for additional design work to accommodate proposed new plant entrance, new incoming trunk sewer serving Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 and addition of new headworks construction access road, on an hourly-rate basis, plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit for a total amount not to exceed $53,060.00. Engineering Services (hourly rates plus overhead at 143 %), not to exceed $ 47,375.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 0.00 Fixed Profit, not to exceed 5,685.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $ 53,060.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Don R. Griffin /s/Don E. Smith Don R. Griffin, o nt a rman Don E. Smith, Vice_735Tn_f_CFa7_rman �coection Committee Selection Committee WThomas M. Dawes mas . awes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "K" AGENDA ITEM #9(J )(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K" RESOLUTION NO. 87-19 APPROVING; ADDENDUM NO. 2 7U PGREEMENr WPIH JOHN CAROLIA ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF JOB NO. P1-20 A JOINT' RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF D1REClC1R.S OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE OOUFAY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO TGREEMENr WITH JOHN CAROILO ENGINEERS FUR DESIGN OF HE'lfD4ARRS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20 WHFBEAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design (Phase I) of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20; and, VEERFAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for additional services re final design (Phase IS) of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20; and, 4NFNEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement to provide for additional design cork to accamodate the proposed new plant entrance, new intoning trunk sewer serving Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 and the addition of new `✓ )radwrks construction access roads; and, F UMEAS, pursuant to authorization of the Hoard of Directors on February 11, 1987, the Selection Co miittee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services, in accordance with established procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DEPERf= AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated March U, 1987, to that certain agreement dated May 11, 1983, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, for preliminary design (Phase I) of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, "L-1 AGENDA ITEM #90 )(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" J Job No. P1-20, providing for additional design Mork to accommodate the proposed new plant entrance, new incoming trunk sewer serving Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 and the AI, addition of new headxorks construction access roads, is hereby approved and accep. ; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $53,060.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $2,439,455.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,492,515.00: Engineering Services at hourly rates, plus overhead at 143%, not to exceed $47,375.00 Direct Expenses -0- Fixed Profit 5,685.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $53,060.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1987. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(j )(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 February 25, 1987 Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Design of Demolition of Digesters 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers for the design of Demolition of Digesters 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, on an hourly-rate basis plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $48,820.00. Engineering Services (hourly rates plus overhead at 143 %), not to exceed $41,670.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 1,950.00 Fixed Profit, not to exceed 5,200.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $48,820.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Don R. Griffin /s Don E. Smith Don R. r n, Joint airman n It vice joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Thomas M. Dawes omas . Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee V.✓ '•M" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "M" RESOLUTION NO. 87-20 APPROVING F2S;r=iw,, smyimS AGREE-= WITH JOH N CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF JOB NO. P1-31 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF CCKWTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, ll, 13 AM 14 OF ORANGE CaMY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREE= WTTH JOHN CAROLED ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF DEMOLITION OF DIGFSTFS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACSMENP OF BOILER; PIPING CLEANOM; AM GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P1-31 *1EREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WBEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with John CaroLlo Engineers for design of Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31; and, MEREA.S, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on February ll, 1987, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee.for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, ll, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AMID ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed Engineering Services Agreement is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved Joint T eatment works Wastewater Master Plan. The project is to be designed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" as amended, and Section 15069 of the Districts' Guidelines, a Final Environmental Impact Report owerinx3 this project was approved by the Districts' �.,.i Boards of Directors an July 10, 1985; and, Section 2. That the certain Engineering Services Agreement dated March 11, 1987, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and John Carollo Engineers, for design of Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 3. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Engineering Services at hourly rates, plus overhead at 143%, not to exceed $41,670.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 1,950.00 `..✓ Fixed Profit 5,200.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $48,820.00 Section 3. That the Chairmen and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, ll, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetirxj held March ll, 1987. "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" I ABSOLUTION W. 87-21 ' APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATION NO. M-029 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DII2➢Cl'ORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FM REMOVAL OF GRIT AT PLANT No. 2, SPECIFICATION NO. M-029 ➢SEREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Removal of Grit at Plant No. 2, Specification No. M-029. NOW, TBEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have concurrently undertaken an environmental, review of the proposed project and hereby determine that said project is categorically exempt from further CECA requirement,./ and, Section 2. That the project for Removal of Grit at Plant No. 2, Specification No. M-029, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day sudanitted to the Boards of Director by Districts' engineers for Removal of Grit at Plant No. 2, Specification No. M-029, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, 110-11, AGENDA ITEM #9(m) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-1" Section S. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, `..✓ Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1987. 110-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(m) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Five 5 CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE a ruary 9, 1987 JOB: MAIN STREET PUMP STATION - CONTRACT NO. 7-7 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dedwat) $ (243.65) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefore, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item I REPAIR PVC T-LOCK It was necessary to repair the PVC T-Lock liner plate in the 66-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) leading to the pump station. The T-Lock was damaged when holes had to be drilled thru the T-Lock in conjunction with a previous repair to the 66-inch RCP. That repair was to stop an extensive ground water leak into the pipe. The cost for the ground water leak repair was reflected in Change Order No. 4, Item 2. This change order covers the costs to repair the holes in the v T-Lock, which was not included in Change Order No. 4. (Reference FCO A5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 465.54 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 2 FLANGE COUPLING ADAPTOR AND MISCELLANEOUS PIPING The contractor was directed to shorten the 36-inch flange coupling adaptor located in the effluent header piping by 3-1/2 inches. This involved cutting, rewelding on a new flange and recoating the interior with coal tar epoxy. There was not enough clearance to install the adaptor as shown on the contract plans. The contractor was also directed to install larger tie rods on the flange coupling adaptors than shown on the plans. The contractor was directed to install four (4) 12-inch wedge spacers in the valve vault drain piping, which was necessary to match the piping from the vault. The contractor was directed to change portions of the 2-inch bubbler system piping on the east and west wet wells from cast iron to stainless steel . The originally specified piping material was subject to corrosion from wet well gases. (Reference FCO /6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,946.09 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 2 Calendar Days "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (1) - DISTRICT 7 "P-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT N0. N/A C. 0. NO. Five (5) - CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE February JOB: MAIN STREET PUMP STATION - CONTRACT NO. 7-7 Item 3 LOWER 36-INCH DIP HEADER The contractor was directed to construct the 36-inch ductile iron pipe, (DIP) header piping 1-1/2 inches lower than originally specified and modify four (4) pipe supports. This change was necessary to avoid a conflict between the top of the 36-inch DIP and the bottom of the catwalk supports. (Reference FCO #7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,539.28 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 2 Calendar Days Item 4 ELECTRICAL MODIFICATIONS TO LIGHTING AND IRRIGATION The contractor was directed to add two (2) lighting contacts and rewire two (2) reset timers. It was necessary to add the contacts due to the lighting load being too large for the specified reset timers. The contractor was also directed to add one (1) duplex outlet and junction box for the irrigation system rather than using the direct-wire sprinkler controller scheme shown on the plans. `.►i (Reference FCO #8) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 837.44 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 5 GRATING AND SUPPORT MODIFICATIONS The contractor was directed to modify the catwalk grating and support system in the pump room. This modification was necessary to alleviate a potential safety hazard due to a conflict with the 36-inch plug valve operator and the grating system elevations as shown on the contract drawings. (Reference FCO #9) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 2,032.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 3 Calendar Days Item 6 HYDROPNEUMATIC TANK SYSTEM MODIFICATION The contractor was directed to modify the piping on the hydropneumatic tank system due to a water hammer problem during the water pump shut down. The suction line was increased from 1-1/2-inch to 3-inch and an additional check valve was added to the system. (Reference FCO #10) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 550.00 `, TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(p)(1) - DISTRICT 7 "P-2- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Five CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE Fe ruary� 9, 1987 JOB: MAIN STREET PUMP STATION - CONTRACT NO. 7-7 Item 7 GUARD AND GATE POST ADDITIONS The original contract plans gave no provision for guard posts around the electrical transformer located in the northwest corner of the Job site. The contractor was directed to install five (5) 4-inch diameter guard posts to restrict traffic in this area thus reducing the potential of a serious accident. The contractor was also directed to install an additional fence gate post and modify the four (4) 30-foot entry gates due to a confl ict with the westerly retaining wall and the elevations of the new asphalt paving. (Reference FCO S11) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,704.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 8 REMOVE FENCE The contractor was directed to remove the chain link fence including the posts on the east side of the new Main Street Pump Station and replace approximately 20 feet of fence and posts at the temporary entrance to the construction site. This work is being accomplished to conform to the requirements of the County of Orange. The County had allowed the District to use part of their property as a construction staging area. The fence removal restores the property to the original condition. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,182.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 9 TIME EXTENSION The contractor was directed to alter his construction sequence in order to start receiving and pumping partial fl ows from Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD). By altering the construction schedule and sequence of construction, the time for construction of the facility increased. It was determined that a time extension of 95 calendar days to the contractor would be fair and reasonable. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 95 Calendar Days "P-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(p)(1) - DISTRICT 7 "P-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �..d CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Five 5 CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE FeDruary 9, 1987 JOB: MAIN STREET PUMP STATION - CONTRACT NO. 7-7 Item 10 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The contract specified liquidated damages in the amount of $500.00 per day for time of completion after date of contract. The time of completion stated included time for weather delays and time for added work where appropriate. The original contract completion date was October 2, 1986. The current revised contract completion date, including authorized time extensions is January 22, 1987. Therefore, liquidated damages of $500.00 per day for the total of twenty-one (21) calendar days, or $10,500.00 is assessed the contractor for the period between January 22 1987, and February 12, 1987. PENALTIES ASSESSED THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (10,500.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER $ (243.65) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 102 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract plus the 102 days time extension granted hereby. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension other than the 102 days approved herein is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date October 3, 1985 Original Contract Time 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 2, 1986 Time Extension this C.O. 102 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 112 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 477 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date January 22, 1987 "P-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(p)(1) - DISTRICT 7 "P-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Five CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE a ruary 9, 1987 JOB: MAIN STREET PUMP STATION - CONTRACT NO. 7-7 Original Contract Price $ 2,901,162.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 157,896.18 This Change (A") (Deduct) $ (Z43 6b) Amended Contract Price $ 1 .S3 Board Authorization Date: March 11, 1987 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: Construction manager ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY: n ontract r rector a n sneer ng "P-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (1) - DISTRICT 7 "P-5" J RESOLUTION NO. 87-22-7 AOCEBTIIIv CONTRACT NO. 7-7 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING MAIN STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-7, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER; Section 1. That the contractor, Advanco Constructors, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7, on Fbruary 12, 1987; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recomiendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Main Street Pimp Station, Contract No. 7-7, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated October 3, 1985; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Pdvanco Constructors, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Main Street Purp Station, Contract No. 7-7, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AMID ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1987, "0" AGENDA ITEM #9(p)(2) - DISTRICT 7 "0" PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Date: TO: Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 • P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 I (We) , the undersigned landowner(s) , do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex 1 . 13 acres (Gross - to nearest hundredth) of territory to the District located in the vicinity of Foothill Boulevard and La Cuesta Drive (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of (untncornnrated) , more particularly (Indicate city or unincorporated territory) described and shownont the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and NAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The street address of the property is 1962 La Cuesta Drive Santa Ana The reason for the proposed annexation is: -r n.v Sand ps�pesty s -Inhabited /_Uninhabited. Number of registered voters, if any: `y�. The assessed value of the property is: $ O .56 Also enclosed are the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE� Z ri ed,by- the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of Sbrepresenting payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. DISTRICT 7 ONLY: The property must also be annexed to the XX 7th or 70th Sewer Maintenance District, the local- sewering agency for the proposed development. Accordingly, enclosed herewith are the legal description and map for annexation to the 7th (7th or 70th) Sewer Maintenance District. Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: Richard Obering Norris-Repke Inc. 1962 La Cuesta Drive 507 E. 1st St. , Ste. Santa Ana , CA 927 55 Tustin, CA 92680 Tele: 838-7062 Tele: ( 714) 730-6410 SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER X P11' �' I�lnn2- �G , c yiPblQ �� ' .r' floc, a) CL1 n) (� r��qs Nam ( ed or printe �- C.� or prim "R" AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICT 7 "R" RESOLUTION NO. 87-23-7 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS RE ANNEXATION NO. 122 - OSERING A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZIN", THE TNM'T CN OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRP1t7RY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 122 - OBERING ANNEXATION TO COMM SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE DETERMINE AND ORDER: That an application for annexation of territory to itself be made to the Local Agency Formation Camiission as follows: Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Goverment Code of the State of California; and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately 1.13 acres located in the vicinity of Vista Dal Lago and IaCaesta Drive in unincorporated County territory, to provide sanitary. sewer service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as requested by Mr. and Mrs. Richard obering, owners of said property, and, Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Section 4. That the designation assigned to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 122 - Obering Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That provisions for all fees required to be paid as a condition of "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICT 7 "S-1" the annexation must be satisfied prior to caopletion of annexation proceedings; and, Section 6. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h)(1) of the Revenue and Taxation Cade, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and, Section 7. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as required by law be taken to omplete this annexation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1987. "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICT 7 "S-2" PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Date: 1 -22-87 `� TO: Board of Directors County sanitation District No. 7 P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 I (We) , the undersigned landowner(s) , do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex 291 .70 acres (Gross - to nearest hundredth) of territory to the District located in the vicinity of From Crawford Canyon and Creekside to Cannon Street and Encanto Street. , (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description)in the city of Orange , more particularly (Indicate city or unincorporated. territory) described and shown ont the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and MAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The street address of the None The reason for the proposed annexation iss Need sewer service for the project. Said property is Inhabited / X Uninhabited. Number of registered voters, if any: The assessed value of the property is: $ Also enclosed are the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of $500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. ONLY: The property must also be annexed to the 7th or 70th Sewer Maintenance local sewering agency for the .proposed development. Accordingly, enclosed here al description and map for annexation to the (7th or 70th) Sewer Maintenance Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: Crawford Hills Development C.M.E. Corporation P. O. Box 5538 3004 Deodar Avenue Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tele: 213/277-5283 Tale: 714/SS7-6n Sn Attn: Gary Rochlin Attn: John Sva)lre SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER x i z B fop �. 'o S S 3R �LLS fiyus CA yoz�0 Name (Typed or printed) X ame (Typed or printed) "T" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICT 7 "T" PETITION MR ANNEXAMON Date: 31 a 1 �� TO: Board of Directors county Sanitation District No. ) 1 P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 I (We), the undersigned lanlowner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex 1 S.10.P-0 acres (Gross - to nearest hundredth) of territory to th/ee� District l located in the vicinity of -4Qll 0-,-4 k N V-VM, o2 6=Mr.WA lki Cq (indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of C tk5 , acre particularly (Indite city or unin crated territory) described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and MAP enclosed 'herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The street address of the property is: PC, c A C C,0 cu -u k W The reason for the proposed \\annexation Iis: -b- r e C 2 i V SRrVIf?_ -�nrr, COUNT &,,.� rmj l� OUI rla+ N0 , 11 Said property is _Inhabi / ✓Uninhabited. Nuaber of registered voters, if any: The assessed value of the property is: $� , Also enclosed are the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL OJESTIONRAME required by the Local Agency Formation Cannission (and an Environmental LTpact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of $500.00 representing paynent of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and =m=icatioas relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: 8 k� v 4.9d71'1 Tele: (-I W) 11,1-01 L0 Tele: 'S�I 'CA&ANDagNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LAN URNER alai 1"1890 JEFF ,Lyn Name (Typed or printed) X "U" Name or prin ) AGENDA ITEM #9(U - DISTRICT 11 'lull COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 21 32 52 6, 72 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON FEBRUARY 11, 1987 PT11SA710,V d�ST J2 0 N Siaee 1954 OgIN'GE co s ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, -.J IFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts goo. 19 2p 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on February 11, 1987, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorun present Ear Districts Noe. 1, 2, 31 % 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 am follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman Donald J. Saltarelli -:-Robert Reason, Chairman pro tam Dana Crank x Dan Griset Dan Young z Roger Stanton _Don Roth DISTRICT 90. 2: _Buck Catlin, Chairman z Chris Norby x Willim D. Mahoney, Chairmn pro tun _Dorothy Wedel -7—Ban Bay Iry Pickier Irwin Pried x J. Todd Murphy _Dan Griset _Dun Young Gene A. Layton x Carrey Nelson _ z James Neel George Scott a Arthur G. Parton _Carol Downey x Bob Perry _Norman Culver xWsyue Silzel _Junes I. Fasbender : Doe Smith Jess Perez x Roger Stanton _ _Don Rath DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polio, Chairman _Larry Berman z Sal Sapien, Chairman pro tam _Martha Weishaupt x Ben gay Ire Pichler Buck Catlin x Chris Norby -7—Frank Clift _Joyce Risner z Norman Culver _Bob Perry z Don Griffin Rhonda J. McCune z Dun Griset _Dan Young x John Renal _Cornelius M. Coronado x Jack Kelly Grace Winchell x William D. Mahoney _Dorothy Wedel =James Neal _George Scott - xCarrey Nelson _John H. Sutton x J.B. "Bob" Siefert Dewey Wiles =Roger Stanton _Don Roth _:..Charles Sylvia _Anthony Selvaggi DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Bart, Chairman John C. Cox, Jr. z John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman pro tea _Ruthelyn Plummer x Roger Stanton _Don Roth DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman _Erie C. Johnson x Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tea Ruthelyn Plummer x Roger Stanton _Don Roth DISTRICT NO. 7: x Richard Edgar, Chairman _Donald J. Saltarelli z Sally Anne Miller, Chairman pro tea _Larry Agran x Jahn C. Cox, Jr. _Ruthelyn Plummer x Dan Grisec _Dan Young x Don Smith - _lees Perez x Roger Stanton Don Roth x lease Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Jack Kelly, Chairman Grace Winchell x Tam Mays, Chairmen pro cam _Peter Green x Roger Stanton =Dan Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: John R. Sutton, Chairman x Carrey Nelson _J. Todd Murphy, Chairman pro tea x Roland E. Bigongec x Bev Bay _Iry Pickier x Don Smith Jess Perez x Roger Stanton _Don Roth \--LSTRICT NO. 14: x Sally Anne Miller, Chairman _Larry Agran a Peer A. Swan, Chairman pro cem _Darryl Miller x Orsula Kennedy _Donald J. Saltarelli x Don Smith Jess Perez x Roger Stanton _Don Roth -2- 02/11/87 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes, William N. Clarke, Blake Anderson, Bill Butler, Penny Kyle, Hilary Baker, Gary Streed, Corinne Clawson, Rich von Langan, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Suzanne Atkins, Assistant General Counsel, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Jackie Hsieh, Director Larry Herman * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICTS 2, 3 6 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpts re Board Appointments That the minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors, appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) - Agency District(s) Active Director Alternate Director Brea 2 Gene A. Layton Carrey J. Nelson 3 Carrey J. Nelson John H. Sutton* 13 John H. Sutton* Carrey J. Nelson Midway City Sanitary Dist. 3 J.R."Bob" Siefen Dewey L. Wiles DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: 1 ; Receive, file and accept resigna- tion of Mayor William J. Odlum of That the letter from Mayor William the City of Villa Park and seating J. Odlum resigning from the Board of first and second alternates to the Directors of District No. 2, be, and is Mayor hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be seated as members of the Boards: District First Alternate Second Alternate 2 Wayne Silzel James T. Fasbender ALL DISTRICTS The Joint. Chairman reported that on - Report of the Joint Chairman February 4th the United States Senate voted 86 to 14 to override President Reagan's veto of the Clean Water Act Renewal. The House of Representatives had acted on February 3rd to override the veto by a vote of 401 to 206. The new Clean Water Act contains the identical language that was in the bill that was vetoed by President Reagan last November after being passed overwhelmingly by both Houses of Congress in October. At that time, however, Congress had adjourned and was unable to consider an override of the President's pocket veto. \ , -3- 02/11/87 After more than three years of intense debate and compromise, the Clean Water Act has been renewed. There is a provision in the Act that authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency to issue a permit, under strict controls, for a five-year scientific research study off Orange County's coastline to investigate whether a controlled discharge of pre-treated municipal sludge delivered to depths in the ocean never before attempted will benefit man and the environment. Many safeguards have been provided to ensure that the project will be conducted in a safe, scientific and unbiased manner and to adequately protect the marine environment. A team of scientists from noted institutions, including Cal-Tech, Scripps Institute of Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, will provide management, monitoring review and oversight of the project. This provision in the Act does not authorize the project to go forward; rather, it merely authorizes the Administrator of EPA to issue a permit for the study once he is satisfied there will be no unacceptable adverse environmental impacts. Further preliminary engineering must be done and technical and environmental reviews completed, as well as public input taken, before the project could commence. This will take several years. Mr. Griffin advised that the Executive Committee had discussed ocean discharge issues at their last two meetings, and a select committee of Directors would be working closely with staff, planning for both the Districts' 301(h) ocean discharge permit extension and the proposed deep-ocean sludge disposal research project. The Joint Chairman announced that the committee will be made up of members of the Select Committee To Advise the Staff and that he would also appoint representatives from the cities of Huntington Beach and Newport Beach to work with the committee. Chairman Griffin reiterated that planning for the future in a manner that will adequately address the issues and the best interests of our communities, keep the public informed, and assure that the Districts continue their program of balanced and scientifically-based total environmental management are all a part of the ongoing program at the Districts. He noted that historically, the Districts have been committed to extensive research because they believe that it is better to invest funds now for research so that an intelligent and informed evaluation can be made on how to best proceed with responsible waste management programs for the future. Mr. Griffin indicated that information on the proposed research project had been previously provided to the Directors and he would be sending a package containing background information on the proposal to each of the Directors colleagues on the city councils, Board of Supervisors and the special districts. The Joint Chairman then reported that the Districts were recently asked by the League of Cities to recommend someone to represent the League on the Stringfellow Advisory Committee. Mr. Griffin announced that the Districts were pleased to recommend that the League consider appointing Mayor John H. Sutton to this committee. Mayor Sutton is uniquely qualified for this appointment and could very ably represent the interests of the cities, the Sanitation Districts and the citizens of Orange County. He is a graduate engineer and recently retired from �i his executive position with a large industrial products firm, which gives him a strong technical background for addressing the complex issues in connection with the Stringfellow waste site. Mayor Sutton is also Chairman of District No. 13. -4- 02/11/87 Chairman Griffin announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, February 18th, at 5:30 p.m. He then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, February 25th,at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Dan Griset, Bob Hanson and John Kanel to 1 attend and participate in the discussions. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented on the Report of the General Manager Supplemental Agenda item relative to extension of the purchase contract for anionic polymer (Specification No. P-086) used for interim physical-chemical advanced primary treatment. The Districts' Director of Operations gave a brief overview of the physical-chemical process which aids in the settlement of suspended solids in the - wastewater, as well as odor control and sludge handling improvements. In order to continue this program and begin treating a larger amount of flow and to allow for testing to compare various polymer products before bidding a long-term contract for polymer, the staff recommended that the current purchase contract with Aqua Ben Corporation be extended for a six-month period under the same terms and conditions as the existing contract. A new supply contract will then be bid following testing of the products on the market. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 14, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held held January 14, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 14, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 14, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 14, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 14, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 14, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- 02/11/87 DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 14, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. `—'�/DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 14, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 1/07/87 1/21/87 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 586,356.80 $ 674,555.04 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,397,900.24 254,965.70 Joint Working Capital Fund - 87,333.87 307,002.94 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 3,138.38 1,215.11 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 44.10 13.78 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 20,917.59 1,671,853.55 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 7,437.89 1,818,247.86 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 583.80 3,576.48 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 555.69 35.28 DISTRICT NO. 7 _ 95,631.65 3,718.26 DISTRICT NO. 11 6,148.02 6,674.96 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - -0- -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 5 6 6 JOINT - 466.35 1,003.18 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 3,617.54 -0- $3,210,131.92 $4,742,862.14 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Uniform Rental Service, Specification No. P-095, to That the letter from Aratex Services, Aratex Services Inc. Inc. dated January 27, 1987, confirming deletion of the garment preparation charge from their bid as the specifications for Uniform Rental Service, Specification No. P-095, did not allow such a charge, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid rahulation and recommendation re award of purchase order contract for Uniform Rental Service, Specification No. P-095, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Aratex Services, Inc. for a three-year period beginning March 1, 1987, with provision for two one-year extensions (estimated annual cost $59,983.00). -6- 02/11/87 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. J-15B-2 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 87-8, accepting Vaults for Ultrasonic Flow Meter for Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-15B-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and Job No. P1-22 (Rebid) specifications for Electrical Reliability Project at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-22 (Rebid), authorizing an addition of $33,290.25 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for costs due to electrical modifications to accommodate the new headworks facility and scrubber complex, and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of the additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and Job No. P2-28-1 specifications for Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28-1, authorizing an additional $1,454.00 to the contract with Ziebarth and Alper for larger size pneumatic valve actuaters, saw cutting of a concrete panel and installation of temporary wood safety handrails, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and Job No. P2-31R specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Basins A, B, C, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, 0, P and Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R, authorizing an addition of $20,405.00 to the contract with Morley-Ziebarth 6 Alper, A Joint Venture, for miscellaneous changes including pipe supports at Basin M, installation of switchgear for six launder valves, additional pipe and fittings and replacement of existing, defective, 14-inch drain valve at Basin M, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Job No. PW-144 specifications for Waste Sidestream and Sludge Pump Stations, Comminutor and Scum System Improvements, Job No. PW-144, authorizing an addition of $92,564.13 to the contract with Floyd Construction Company and Martin A. Kordick, a Joint Venture, for 19 items of migr�ilaneous modifications and additional work, and granting a time extension of 109 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. 1 -7- 02/11/87 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and Job No. PW-144 specifications for Waste Sidestream and \� Sludge Pump Stations, Comminutor and Scum System Improvements, Job No. PW-144, approving a deduction of $13,000.00 from the contract with Floyd Construction Company and Martin A. Rordick, a Joint Venture, for penalties assessed the contractor for 13 days at $1,000.00 per day from October 13 to October 26, 1986, pursuant to the contract provisions, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-144 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 87-9, accepting Waste Sidestream and Sludge Pump Stations, Comminutor and Scum System Improvements, Job No. PW-144, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Engineering-Science, That the Selection Committee Inc. re preparation of an Air certification of the final negotiated Quality Assessment Model fee for Professional Services Agreement with Engineering-Science, Inc. for the preparation of an Air Quality Assessment Model to study the effects generated by construction of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19; Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20; Installation of Replacement of Centrifuges with Belt Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-21; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Solids Handling, Dewatering and Dry Storage Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24-2; Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28-1; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33, required by the South Coast Air Quality Management District as a permit condition relative to said jobs, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 87-10, approving Professional Services Agreement with Engineering-Science, Inc. for the preparation of an Air Quality Assessment Model to study the effects generated by construction of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19; Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20; Installation of Replacement of Centrifuges with Belt Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-21; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Solids Handling, Dewatering and Dry Storage Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-24-2; Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28-1; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33, required by the South Coast Air Quality Management District as a permit condition relative to said jobs, on an hourly-rate basis, plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $35,145.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -8- 02/11/87 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Engineering Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum John Carollo Engineers re design of No. 2 to the Engineering Services 1 , Job No. P1-20 Agreement with John Carollo Engineers �.✓ for design of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, to accommodate proposed new plant entrance, new incoming trunk sewer serving Districts 6, 7 and 14, and addition of new headworks construction access road. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 3 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Engineering Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum John Carollo Engineers re design of No. 3 to the Engineering Services Job No. P1-22 (Rebid) and Agreement with John Carollo Engineers Job No. J-6-2 for design of Electrical Reliability Project at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-22 (Rebid), and Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2, for preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Manual for said facilities. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an Engineering That the Selection Committee be, and is Services Agreement re preparation hereby, authorized to solicit proposals of plans and specifications for and negotiate an Engineering Services Job No. P1-31 Agreement for the preparation of plans and specifications for Demolition of 1 Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading �wd and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving one—year renewal agreement with CPT California, Inc. That a one—year renewal agreement with for maintenance of office CPT California, Inc. for maintenance and automation system periodic system upgrades of the Districts' office automation system, beginning February 13, 1987, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment in the amount of $28,100.00 plus tax for said services is hereby authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on January 28, 1987, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and apprn•+ d. -9- 02/11/87 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to negotiate a purchase contract with Infilco That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Degremont, Inc. (IDI) for Purchase to negotiate a purchase contract with `� of Bar Screen Equipment for the New Infilco Degremont, Inc. (IDI) for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 and Purchase of Bar Screen Equipment for the Replacement of Existing Bar Screen New Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 and Equipment at Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement of Existing Bar Screen "C" (Specification No. E-178) Equipment at Plant No. 2 Headworks "C" (Specification No. E-178) for the Boards' future consideration. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Concurring with the proposed Memorandum of Understanding between That the Boards of Directors do hereby District No. 14 and the Irvine concur with the proposed Memorandum of Ranch Water District governing Understanding between District No. 14 Industrial Waste Program and the Irvine Ranch Water District Administration governing Industrial Waste Program Administration, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreement Acquiring Ownership Interests, Assigning Rights and Establishing Obligations dated February 13, 1986. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing reimbursement to the County of Orange for additional That reimbursement to the County of temporary heavy equipment costs Orange in an amount not to exceed required re co-disposal at $50,000.00 for additional temporary Coyote Canyon heavy equipment costs required to optimize co-disposal of municipal solid wastes and wastewater solids residuals at Coyote Canyon be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, authorized No. 22951 with Aqua Ben Corporation to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase re Specification No. P-086 Order No. 22951 with Aqua Ben Corporation for Purchase of Anionic Polymer and Polymer Supply System, Specification No. P-086, used for interim, advanced primary, physical-chemical treatment application, exercising option to extend said contract under the same terms and conditions from February 18, 1987, up to August 31, 1987, pending completion of new Advanced Primary Treatment Chemical Addition Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-28, and Advanced Primary Treatment Chemical Addition Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-36, and testing of currently available polymers on the market in preparation for bidding and awarding a polymer-supply contract for the new advanced primary treatment operation (estimated cost of contract extension $120,000.00). DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Contract No. 1-15R That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 87-11-1, approving plans and specifications for Santa Ana/Dyer Road Trunk Sewer Manhole �i Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-15R, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -10- 02/11/87 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m. , February 11, 1987. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Engineering Services Agreement with Willdan Associates That the Selection Committee re design of Contract No. 2-22 certification of the final negotiated fee with Willdan Associates for design of East Richfield Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-22, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 87-12-2, approving Engineering Services Agreement with Willdan Associates for design of East Richfield Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-22, on an hourly-rate basis, plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $12,910.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 64 - Stropus Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 87-13-2, ordering annexation of 1.109 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 64 - Stropus Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 67 - Merrill Lynch Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 87-14-2, ordering annexation of .511 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Country Hill Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 67 - Merrill Lynch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m. , February 11, 1987. - DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Settlement Agreement and General Release of All Claims with That the Settlement Agreement and the Garden Grove Sanitary District General Release of All Claims for damage to local sewer manholes adjacent to existing District trunk sewers, with the Garden Grove Sanitary District, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment to the Garden Grove Sanitary District in the amount of $64,170.00, in accordance with the reimbursement policy previously adopted by, the Board, be, and is hereby, authorized. -11- 02/11/87 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m. , February 11, 1987. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m., February 11, 1987. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m., February 11, 1987. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m. , February 11, 1987. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m. , February 11, 1987. \—�ISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m. , February 11, 1987. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing initiation of proceedings re proposed That the Board of Directors hereby Detachment No. 1 adopts Resolution No. 87-16-14, authorizing initiation of proceedings to detach 132 acres of territory from District No. 14 in the vicinity southeast of the City of Newport Beach in unincorporated County territory, which was inadvertently included in the formation of said District 14 and is currently also in District No. 5, proposed Detachment No. 1 from County Sanitation District No. 14. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Memorandum of Understanding between County That the Board of Directors hereby Sanitation District No. 14 and adopts Resolution No. 87-17-14, Irvine Ranch Water District approving Memorandum of Understanding Governing Industrial Waste Program between County Sanitation District administration No. 14 of Orange County, California and Irvine Ranch Water District Governing Industrial Waste Program Administration. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -12- 02/11/87 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Introduction and adoption of Ordinance No. 1401, an Urgency That Ordinance No. 1401, an Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors Ordinance of the Board of Directors of of County Sanitation District County Sanitation District No. 14 of No. 14 Orange County, California, establishing regulations for use of District Sewerage Facilities, be, and is hereby, introduced; and, FURTHER MOVED: That Ordinance No. 1401, an Urgency Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, establishing regulations for use of District Sewerage Facilities, be, and is hereby, adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Sally Anne Miller, Chairman, Ursula Kennedy, Don E. Smith, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: Peer A. Swan DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:52 p.m. , February 11, 1987. Secretary, Ubards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Noe. 1 , 2, 31 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -13- FUND NO -199 - JT GIST VOPKTNG CAPITAL ^� PPOCESSING DATE 1/n3/87 PAGF' I �4 RFPOPT NUMBER AP43 C-pUxTr e e C LATHS PAID Ol/07/87 'AR9AP7 � ._ VENDOR— ANGUMJ---_ _DESCRIP 7.I ON.._..__._...-. ._....__.... ___._.— _ . ° 083R95 FERRO METALS. INC. $438.65 STEEL ° 4.369, ACTION INSTRIJN NSIRUNEIITATLON-EQUIPNENTPARTS_.___. 083F97 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. $243.911.11 CONTRACTOR 7-7. PI-24R ° 083898 ALEX GLASS $329.42 TRUCK REPAIR ` _—VALVES....._- ...__ ...___. D839CO ALL TUBE CHEMICAL $73.728.54 CHLORINE 083901 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1.033.21 LAB SUPPLIES fii 00 I ABSERVICES _—_.—_ 083903 THE ANCHOR RACKING CO. E3.726.81 PUMP PARTS 083904 ASSOCIATED DIESEL 1$140.04 ' TRUCK PARTS . 2"S •9SGCJASE0.LABO...... 5 ^9" 09 083906 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 342,205.78 SLUDGE DISPOSAL 883907 PAW SAFETY R SUPPLY $172.25 SAFETY SUPPLIES .. 4600 00 TRAINING_ON--UISTRUNENTATLON-EQULPMEtlL ° OF3909 BECKPAN INDUSTRIAL $468.63 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES 083510 BENZ ENGINEERING. INC. $14.04 EQUIPMENT PARTS ^93s11 eI A.v . nECAUE. MFG. G0. m U83912 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $6.660.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES/OCEAN AVENUE TRUNK SEWER X 983913 BRENNER-FIEDLER S ASSOC., INC. S311.32 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT PARTS tl2LOYE"LEAGE —. 083915 BROWN S CALDWELL 1225,11 LAB SUPPLIES - 083916 06KKE ENGINEERING CO. $9 7 2.5 3 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS '3.083917_ 4I3L_4Au u_ uUTLE' SS62-30 PEATY-CASK_ —_--- n 08351M BUTTERWORTH PUBLISHERS S39.95 PUBLICATION I 083419 CS CCMPANY S72.21 VALVE _.EVALUAIE_S_EURCNASE_EMLSS I ON-AEDUCUON-CRED I TS 083921 CENTEL SYSTEMS S3.393.}4 I COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 083922 CHEMIEST INDUSTRIES, INC. 415,114.22 FERRIC CHLORIDE -4A3923-- -C.}.i.i +-GO.-.y-IN;- - --- --3376.00--- ---ENGINE-RANTS -. n83924 COUNTY I DA T ED ELECTRICAL GIST. . BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTION G83925 COUNTY OF ORANGE GE f1,960.960.00 DD EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT-015T. /7 BLIGAT ION 083927 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION S144.96 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX 083928 DECO S6.87 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ..093S29 `23.30— IONSTRUCTION.MATERIALS-.- - -.-..._._ ..... OR3930 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS S134.90 LAB SUPPLIES ON3931 IATCC POLYMERS $14.147.84 CATIONIC POLYMER 6+SLG.00 `LUOGEPRI.NDER-REBALA--___.. 0839-3 BOMRR ELECTRIC. INC. $43.682.28 CONTRACTOR PI-22-1 083934 'DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. $3,773.33 FIBERGLASS DUCTING ----BUWN-FP WAAO6-CORP.----- - • 5819.42 - ---- --_...___.__. PAINT SUPPLIES C83-36 EASTMAN. INC. $879.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 08"37 JEFF ESBER S89.94 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE —FA"CRY--R.CRRC"*TAT4-VE-.- NC "wi68+iS— INSTRUMENTATION_EQUIPMENT.-_.__.____.__ 023939 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $23.00 DELIVERY SERVICES 083940 - FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1.273.52 ENGINE PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JY DIST WORKING CAPITAL PPOCESSIHG DATE 1/03/87 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 01/07/87 ` ABRAYT-ND. - vrYOn° AYOLY* —_OESCRIR7 ION__..___. 083941 FISCHER L PORTER CO. $3.960.62 CHLORINATION EQUIPMENT u RIHT-SUPPEIES---- 083.44 THE FOXBORO CO. $257.47 INSTRUMENTATION E IP14ENT OB1944 THE FOKOOFO COMPANY .17 K-47 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT • C835AL.___._._FRICK-6 •LAGHalick R MTi _ `S86.60.- Q —TRUCK-PARTS- __-_. .-...__._.. .183947 FRICTIGAL LATHER MPG. t86.70 FREIGHT CHARGES OP3947 FRICTION MATERIAL CO. /589.62 TRUCK PARTS CFTTF 083949 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $2.019.29 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES OS3950 GIERLICH-MITCHELL. INC. $194.67 - FREIGHT CHARGES e 15 skew " a ., er e• -___ EARING3 083952 HACH COMPANY v $544.27 LAB SUPPLIES 083953 HALPRIN SUPPLY CO. $589.30 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT EFERREUTORP-015TRTB0T10W -_ 083955 MATCH ENTERPRISES S3.702.16 TRAILER 083956 S. A. HEADY CO. $95,632.08 CONTRACTOR PI-23p 8195.7 JON•• r- ue pyF,R_Cn__ .or LTSTRICAL .__ 083958 Y.C. NENDRIE L CO.. INC. $512.76 �U��� u fT1 PIPE SUPPLIES C T C83959 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 1345.03 BATTERIES n n.ocn r.Tync un NL{Yf Td11 REiC° '8 LT3 BS A.tft USAGE- 083961 HYDROTEK $995.66 ' C83962 ICC INSTRUMENT $132.65 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 356.3— 1ILLAIL ,y{ ELECTRICAL DRIDE-REPAIR5 - 083964 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS S691.65 HARDWARE RCDp10F -- -' 083965 INGRAM PAPER $217.73 HARDWARE I OFFICE SUPPLIES 'a CalXPDTER�PERATIOWSTTECHN ICAL-30pp6R7 003966 IRVI"`: RANCH WATER DISTRICT s3$325..00 CONNECT MANHOLE TO HARVARD TRUNK SEWER-DIST. 17 OD 3968 THE G PRESS t325.00 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING _ '—D03069__-_--- .----JY M.ENEIMEER3 NG_ttlC. `" CONTRACTOR- -- `� C83970 GLENN R. JAMESON $3,975.00 3=30---- ----- ON'_ INSTRUMENTS CO. t767INSTRUMENTATIONENGINEERING SERVICES/UNDERGROUND TANK COMPLIANCE OB3971 J 932-_ , Y INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT L93003973 KAMAK BEARINGS t SUPPLY $3.334.13 N 083974 MEE.HAN SUPPLY $1.482.00 MECHANICAL PARTS t-83575- ---- --M14V1i-VAC7F7{-OA - tL-14 723.22 VALVE PARTS 087-76 KIEYIT PACIFIC CO. $74.241.30— ENGINEERING -6=1-t-F158G2-- --'_._.._..._..._..__ P85977 FING BEARING, INC. $393.67 ENGINEERING PW121-I a63^7B I - MECHANICAL PARTS 083979 LFE L GO CONSULTING EN61t. S12.262.00 ENGINEERING PI-23R, P4-24R, P2-31A OP.3980 'LEVCC ELECTRIC CO. $153.64 TRUCK REPAIR —C8398L---.--__L1.GN]}Y4-DTST810UlON --------..._ --ELECTRICAL'SUPPLIES' -- `--- 083982 M.G. INDUSTRIES S1.753.06 SPECIALITY GASSES 083983 MPS $42.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 39DA �18D e.s �nu5, r..�. C SAWZS.L.30..—_ �R711ACTORTI=2'I�..PT=24'4711=6611=1-.-_.___ - 003985 MARINE L VALVE SUPFLY $712.32 CHLORINATION EQUIPMENT PARTS 083986 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $05.18 TOOLS C. ` FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST L'ORKING CAPITAL n� RROCESSING OATS 1/R3/07 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 \rl • CLAIMS PAID 11/O7/8T ` — _—__DESCRIPT.ION I• OP3907 MICROAGE COMPUTER $2,046.86 COMPUTER/INSTRUMENTATION _664409 Nipc V _i s-N.'R Go 692.66 'AFETY-SUPPLIES 1 0839P.9 NIVA NMSLE NURSERY, LTD. '$289.17 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 003990 MORITZ FOUNDRY $3,264.80 MANHOLES • }9.ai-.--__MOn LCY�LFEOAA.iLr-1�kREA— __ _ P2-31R •*b4.7S1.40---- —CONTMC70R- - P03992 PULTITE7 $36.447.02 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 08Z993 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $31.80 SAFETY SUPPLIES ' EGHANIGAL-PARTS-- — 083995 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $59.79 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT PARTS - 083996 C17Y OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.16 WATER USAGE 10_--pµb.eeV pORyh_CPtiyl.-CyGR. -"II INSTRUMENTATION-EQUIPMENT-PARTS------- - CR3998 NUMATIC ENGINEFRING $903.80 MECHANICAL PARTS i• 983999 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. $4.029.95 CAUSTIC SODA - EkEGT0.1GA1rCUPPkIE6 -- - 98 sC01 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. S3B.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES OA4002 ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL -5617.28 FIBERGLASS "^LFSALE S52.5.833 E6EGTRIGAL-REPAIRS ----- ` I'Tl 084TG4 CHANCE VALVEy1 uFITTING CO. 5817.09 PIPE SUPPLIES ` X 084C05 ORI TER CORP $338.81 MECHANICAL PARTS GN6N HX-DE0.V16F5 " O89097 COUNTY OF ORANGE - 549r420.00 SLUDGE DISPOSAL 084008 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT.. 13.138.38 8A-0L4 o.r.FJP "ECtlAMJl•' A'W81.Y t>127. A9 . REIMBURSE WORKERS CORP. INSURANCE FUND PUMP-PARTS D 0R4010 PACIFIC SAFETY EOUIPMENT CO. $948.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES 084J111 PACIFIC BELL $642.48 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES O064013 PARTS UNLIMITEn $1.020.40 TRUCK PARTS - 084014 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS $286.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES --O&6II15-- -_ROS I-ILV6-nNOMO7S0N8- ------'44.56----- --FREIGHT CHARGES - - - -- --- 004016 PRIORITY ONE ELECTRONICS $198.22 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT PARTS (84917 PROTECTION ENGINEERING INC. $1.160.37 PAINT SUPPLIES 6N HECTURAL-SERVI G"fiCURI MPROVEMENTS 684019 DUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY 12g7.08 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 094320 ROPES AUTO TRIM $195.89 TRUCK REPAIR 1"YLRSON-L-SON.-I1C. 17...b12.34-- -PIPE-SUPPLIES------- ----- ------ - 084022 SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. 511.943.03 CONTRACTOR 2-10-IA 084023 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS 3237.59 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES /OEO-DOCUMENTARY- ------ 054025 SEA COAST DESIGNS 41.402.38 OFFICE'FURNITURE E84026 SEARS. ROEBUCK 8 CO. 1285.02 TOOLS LLL C-PR.000CTS-0^. .-..-___._.._-SI.514.82- .-_.__-_- . .WATER METER (04028 SEANOT CORPORATION 116.920.48 CONTRACTOR PW-061R-4 P84n29 FIERkA INDUSTRIES 51.792.OR MECHANICAL REPAIRS oll-oso to '31ii--- A Y ALiTV •".S44.70 - • OBAD31 SOUTtEAM CALIF. EDISON CO. $313.673.60 POWER V84032 SO. CALIF. THANE SERVICE 9252.87 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/03/87 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 �l ORANGE CLAIMS PAID 01/07/87 084033 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $1.612.28 DIESEL FUEL CK DARTS 084035 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. $1,553.57 TOOLS 004036 SUNSET FORD $53.58 TRUCK PARTS ..4m, SURLLLO"Nr_ 175.20 —LABSUPPLIES_.._____.—._�_.__ 084038 SUPER CHEM CORP 1958.24 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 084039 SUPER ICE CORP. S69.31 ICE AEEIY_SDPPLIES/TO01S OP4141 SWEETLAND CO. $395.47 PIPE SUPPLIES 024042 TAYLGR-DUNN S379.48 TRUCK PARTS __Sn4.9AS TNLRR0.dAJt¢8LL-ASN-CO¢P 1780..64 SUPPLIES 984044 ING CELAVAL 51.183.76 ENGINE PARTS P84045 TRUCK C AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $387.50 TRUCK PARTS SIBUMENIATION.MtP.MENiPART.5--_ 084047 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $179.13 DELIVERY SERVICE 084048 UNIVERSAL MACK $939.23 TRUCK PARTS �8A SUPPLIES FTT 084950 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3.458.13 PIPE SUPPLIES X OR9451 APCO VALVE 8 PRIMER CORP. $457.38 VALVE = nge 252 ve LvE a ZEn eup R� v 287 A5 A.vac Fa E09153 VISTA PAINT COPP. i1.03 T.60 ' MINI BLINDS [A 084054 RICHARD W. VON LANGEN $30.00 EMPLOYEE MEETING EXPENSE -4 C8A.U55--___yamINC- SAFETY SUPPI IFS' n P84P56 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. INC. 1415.76 ENGINEERING P2-23-6 1 484C57 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER $323.46 ENGINE PARTS £ g8At.5R u LABSERYJCES OR4059 WESTERN DIESEL. INC. $4,815.44 TRUCK PARTS 08406E WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY S2Q55.00 CAUSTIC SODA I_-0B4261.... ....—WESTEAN_-LIL_L ALLOY 5555.87 ELDING.SUPPLIES-- —.—_ ___._ C84662 WEST INGHOUSE EL[CTP.IC SUPPLY $57,997.84 CONTRACTOR PI-22C 8 J-6-2 004P63 WHITE, FINE R VERVILLE $1,146.20 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY ,c0 ENTAL9 ❑IC 3.... .. FMFRRFNrY ETREFT REPAIR-D1ST. 0Z 084065 XEROX CORP. $2,209.68 COPIER LEASE 084366 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES $1.362.99 . VALVES ZILBARTH AND IALPER 5409�48 PB4GE8 2IE8 ARTx AND ALPER ----- ----- CONTPl1COTR P2-28-I TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/07/87 13.231.131.92 FUND NO ■ - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/03/87 PAGE 5( REPORT NUMBER AP43 ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' CLAIMS PAID 01/07/87 ' SUMMARY AMOUNT 7 /1 OPER FUND $ 44.10 02 OPER FUND 8,996.23 + ,_,L Aq0 NO FU __.__—...______. - _ /2 F/R FUND 10,993.03 /3 OPER FUND 3,367.28 �+ 3 ACO FUND A.923!61 " 05 OPEN FUND 3. 0 " 06 OPER FUND 555.69 [L4P.4R FUxP_._ " /7 F/R FUND 90,539.b2 _ III OPEN FUND 14.12 _ ACO FUND 33. o _ /1 OPER FUND 6 1 2 2 /14 ACO FUND 11.33 ' OPER FUND 466.3755 _ /6F7 OPER FUND - 3, I).� JT OPER FUND 586,356.80 CONF 2 ON SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 3, 3 .3 JT WORKING CAPITAL _. 87,293.72 - LIn TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/07/87 83,2I0,131.92 FUND NO 9199 - JT D''ST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/15/P1 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ,00UNTY ,SpN1 TATIGN_DISTR SD TS,OF,.QRAN6E COUNTY --�—�-- CLAIMS PAID OI%21/87 WARRANT NO. VENDOR _._ . AMOUNT.. , ., _ , DESCRIPTION, 084089 FERRO METALS, INC. $1,418.95 STEEL P84041! ABC OIL CO. $11.,04 ._ REFUND USE CHARGE OB4C91 AC CII'PP INT •N COPY i379.08 PRINTING 084092 ADOHR FARMS $7,376.75 REFUND USE CHARGE 084093 AEROCOMP, INC. ._.... _._...,....... ._ . .. $676.00 ., _... _. . _,.._. ENGINEERING/REFINED EMISSIONS MODELING 084594 AIH COLD SUPPLY INC. $241.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES n84095 AIR PRODUCTS S CHEMICAL INC. $550.00 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE 084096 ALL-STATE VEHICLC S3„ INC. 6_21 VEHICLE LEASE : 084047-__ $2.83 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. f2b79.69 CHLORINATION PARTS 08409A ALL PURE CHEMICAL $46,097.25 BULK CHLORINE AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC. PR.QQU;T.$ _.__.._. #660.26. LAB,SUPPLIES 0841OG AMERITECH $106.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 084101 ANAHEIM FOUNDRY $2,266.22 REFUND USE CHARGE s 084102 THE ANCHOR..PACNINQ_CQy_, 33r 049.43 _MECHANICAL PARTS 0 084103 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES GROUP 9100.90 TOWEL RENTAL _ 01141C4 AQUA BEN CORP. i1,958.88 ANIONIC POLYMER 004101 ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES 084106 AWARDSSTPOFHIES $31.69 PLAQUES .m OS4107 SC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC. $17.63 EQUIPMENT REPAIR .x _.._ 1 BNW 084 B SAFETY S SUPPLY_ 3253.,75 SAFETY SUPPLIES __Q.. .___. . __...__ 094109 BANK OF AMERICA $348.69 TRAVEL EXPENSE/VISA 'W 084110 BANK OF AMERICA NT 3 SA S3,470.192.28 40T. AYMT. CERTIF. OF PARTICIP., DIST 1,2,63 ti 981111 .... .' DON C. BEATTIE,_ QQ_____ ___,INSPECTION. OF,CHLORINE PI P,I NO, _+ 064112 BEECH STREET EMPLOYEE BENF11 $55.38 PREFERRED PROVIDER CHARGE-SF HEALTH PLAN GD 084113 BEESON SAND 9 GRAVEL, INC. $309.52 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 1 084114 BEHR ,PROCESS CORP...______ $2�0_2¢___ REFUND USE.CHARGE 084116 ROUE PT BElIAMON.YMATERM FROST S AS $1$806.72 ENGINEERING 5-27 089116 SLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS $806.72 CONSTRUCTION WITERIALS 08411T BOMAP MAGNETO SCRVICE,,_I NCs ._._E37Br66._..... EQUIPMEMT.RFPAIR_.._ __ .___..... ..._. D84118 ROWY ROUGE CAFE $332.99 REFUND USE CHARGE OR41I9 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 1113.842:72 ENGINEERING J-16 u OP 4129,_ WM. H. BRAYTON TRUP.T.___ CHARGE ._.___._._..... .... ._.. .__..... _ 08il21 BREA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL $1,262.27 REFUND USE CHARGE 084122 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $32.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES L .._...._.....084123 BROWN L CALDWELL ...._..__._.. ...$525.00 .._.. „EAR SUPPLIES 089124 BROWN S CALDYFLL CONSULTING $21r640.16 ENGINEERING J-19 084125 PUCK'S ENTERPRISES, INC. $351.17 REFUND USE CHARGE DP9,126_._._. BURKE ENGINEERING CO. „iT99,;E8..__.._._-_.__.__ELECTRICAL,SUPPLIES, _„_..... ... 084128 WELL IAN N. BUTLER $1,250.00 PETTY CASH 089128 • C i P RECONDITIONING CO. $2,084.05 PUMP REPAIR '. 084130 CAL-COMPACN F0003 . _ ., ..._. .... . . $1,007.40 ._........ REFUND USE CHARGE 084131 CALIFOL . INC. f1$733.09 PIPE SUPPLIES OP9131 CALL FOPNIA AUTO COLLISION, INC fT33.09 TRUCK REPAIRS PS 4132.._.... .. CALIF. CONSOLIDATED WATER _. . ......._._. .... ..,. P699,62 ,,.. ._. .AEFUNO_USE„CHARGE 089133 CALIFORNIA SUPPC SSION SYSTEMS $250.00 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SERVICE 084134 CALLAHAN, MCHUNE S WILLIS 3717.42 LEGAL SERVICES s, ii FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YORXING.CAPITAL PROCESSING -DATE 1/15/87 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP13 CO0NTY..SANITAT.IQN,_� <15TS OF.-Oft ANSE ._C9VNYY ...._—_ _... ..__......._._._CLAIMS P 0 01/21/87 WARRANT NO. VENDOR ...._ .. AMOUNT. . _ ... _. .. DESCRIPTION ._. . . ' . 08/135 CALMONT ENO. L ELECTS. CORP. $294.66 REFUND USE CHARGE 084136 _ CAPE INC. ___ ELECTRICAL_SUPPLIES + OSIl37 CARENEST MASTER NURSING CENTER--- $93.95 REFUN6OSE CNANSE 081138 CARLETON ENGINEERS s1,301.86 EVALUATION OF EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS •. _____084139 , .., JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS .... ._.._ _ ...___........ 11169,1WI-71,_. ....___. __.ENGINEERING PI-20_ _ 0 881119 CASTLE CONTROLS. INC. $308.98 VALVE-NEEOLE 08/141 CHEFMASTAER CO. $670.97 REFUND USE CHARGE OR9112 CHEMWEST INDUSTRIES, INC., 118t157.,81 FERRIC CHLORIDE__ 084143 CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. 612,9$6.02 GASOLINE . 0 O81I11 CHEVRON USA. INC. t6. 2 GASOLINE OIRTEL, INC... . £2f3Y3,.23_____ REFUND_USE CNAAGE 0041/6 COMPASS LANDSCAPE _ $2,551.13 IANDSCAPONS MAINTENANCE 0841/7 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF S325.00 PUMP REPAIR ..,.,CONSOLIDATED, ELED7RIC6L_Q.EST. 18.UB,Za2T_. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS __ _ _ 08/149 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS t668.89 —6�EPPIN3T�-RFPAb6UL71ON -- 089150 CONTROL DATA CORPORATION $4.607.04 ,COMPUTER REPAIR PLANT 2 40g.10i_ .........._._ .OOS+ N MES A. AUTO.SUPPLY £l.9.7 ePI TRUCK PARTS 081152 R. C. COULTER CRANE RENTAL $1,223.20 EQUIPMENT PENTAI ' fTl 084153 COUNTY INVESTMENTS - 1 $6./9 REFUND USE CHARGE rXIIM___.__000NTYU INVESTMENTS 11 11Q_55 _REFUND USE_ CHARGE __4155 CAL WATER $534.75 EQUIPMENTAENIA� - 4156 CUSTOMNEAVE CARPETS♦ INC. $16,750.11 REFUND USE CHARGE q,IgZ__ DAILY PILOT.*_ � s21..QZ_. LEGALADVERTISING4158 DANIEL BOYLE EN6R., INC. $2,363.51 ENGINEERING LOS ALAMITO SUB TRUNK 4159 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $7,898.06 TRUCK PARTS A t6,Q___ ,, _ DAVIS-RRONNCO. s1,590.00_ _ APPLIANCES PLANT 2 II6l DECO - _ $822.21 ELECTRICALSNPPLlES--___4162 DE GUELLE 6 SONS GLASS CO. $27.08 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS g363 DELANEYS .. .. _._£9,99._ ._.___.__REFUND.USE-CHARGE1161 DIATEC POLYMERS $11,792.60 CATIONIC POLYMER 4165 DICEON ELECTRONICS INC. $2,045.82 REFUND USE CHARGE + 6I366.. . .. DICEON T,_PLAN]TI 12 1 $I.6LQa9$___ REFUND USERTSCHARGE,__- __. G84167 DIESEL LOGISTICS. INC. $2.803.17 EQUIPMENT PA UP4169 DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. 67,490.01 SCAFFOLDING INSTALLED AT PLANT NO. 2 O8I169 DUMAS DIESEL INJEQ7NOII_.. . £ifSf. L.91__. _._...—__..PUMP REPAIR, .. ._._.. . .. 084176 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $15.77 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 084171 DY - DEE SERVICE s1.202.37 REFUND USE CHARGE 001172 ' EIMCO PROCESS EQUIP. CO, ...........__.___.._. ...£?.f iPg,eD:_.. .__ _„ EQUIPMENT_PARTS 084173 EASTMAN, INC. $5/9.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 08/174 EL CORTEZ LOOSL $/6.85 REFUND USE CHARGE _.____084175 ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING CD , . fR55.50 _ . . _ ._ PUBLICATION _ .. . ... . 08017 EMERGENCY POWER ENGINEERING . REFUND USE CHARGE _ 091177 ENCHANTER, INC. $3.50050V.0000 OCEAN MONITOR -__081170 FAIRWAY FORD SALf S, INC. .....RI.06 ._ ...._.. REFUND,USE_CHARGE 0811 FEDR SALES S SERVICE 122.90 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Ofl 9I8080 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. S11.00 DELIVERY SERVICES � i FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST HORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/15/87 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _...._...._. __. ..... .. .. ._.. ...C99NT Y..SA All TY AIIQN.QI BT91CT.6. QP.o RAN Gr .Q9NI T..—___..__ ..____..__....._..._____— + CLAIMS PAID 01/21/87 i .__.WARRANT NO. VENDOR .. . . AMOUNT., DESCRIPTION + 084181 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $253.79 MECHANICAL PARTS • QR9,,1 BY„_,_, ,,, , _„ ft$C NER. L PORTER CO.,,, G$S.3T 7eT0_ ___ __ TRANSMITTER i 084183 FLAGSTONE MOTEL $310.72 REFUND'USE—CHARGE - -- — 084184 FLAT C VERTICAL CONCRETE $1,137.50 CORE DRILL _.0841@B. . CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY ..f _01..284.56 .._ HATER USAGE m 084187 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT ,481.51 FAINT MENTA IO L. Otl9187 THE FOXBORO COMPANY f1.981.51 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES " 0R93BO._......__..__.....THE.FOXBORO COMPANY A20AA.T2.__.__ _INSTRUMENTATION REPAIR _+ 684189 FRICK-GALLAGNER MFG. S6.329.22 Ii1FLVTMS---- ------ - - C84190 FRICTION MATERIAL CO. $181.73 TRUCK PARTS FROST ENGINEERING S ERY.I.CES_LQ A.. __ _._J 10100._._____....—_WHANICAL PARTS . 8419 F G L ENVIRONMENTAL . ERVIC WAR SES C n R 9193 CITY OF FULLED TON $65 565.1515 HATER USAGE 084199 GENF RA,L„TFLEPHONE_-J9. 31>�2E.A.17 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES 004196 GIFRLIC HA.I GIGLIO. INC. f20.$50.19 PUMP 089196 RICH ARD A. G16LI0 $50.19 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE _-095197..._.._.. GRANU.MOTEL I ...............___._-- _._.___£89e39._.._ REFUND. USE_CNAAGE----__.. _> 084198 GREGG'S INNEL FOOD PRODUCTS $11$236.17 REFUND USE CHARGE +m 089199 GR IN HELL CORPORATION 5236.17 REFUND USE CHARGE 'x 084200 MAON..0 OMP AN T, ..._ $2221M LAUMLLES 089201 HATCH 6 NIRN, INC. $110.24 ENGINE PARTS n 084202 HEALTHCARE MEDICAL CENTER F24239.73 REFUND USE CHARGE HEWLETT PACKAR D,. 084204 HIGHLANDER CLEANING CENTER $72.45 REFUND USE CHARGE .•Ca 084205 HODGES, EDNIN E. $26.10 MEETING EXPENSE ' a_B.4.zQ6 __....... _._. KuFFY.COAPQRATIGN._.... _.. Ii_ _.Q1 RE_.PARTS___ _—_. .... ...... ...._..__ 0842C7 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $246.71 PAINT SUPPLIES 084208 HUGHES AIRCRAFT 13.561.93 REFUND USE CHARGE ",__.. 084209 CITY OF HUNTINGTON It 6.00.__.__—._..—._._.WATER.USAGE___.. .._.._._._ . ... .__...._. 084210 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP S58.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 081211 HURLEY ELECTRONICS. INC. 3172.78 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1, QA42}2. ., . IMFERIAL NEST.,CMER]C46_.._.— Sa16.7.69 084213 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 11,202.08 HARDWARE 004214 1NTERCONICS. CIRPACK $220.26 REFUND USE CHARGE ii 084215 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY_ .... .£924.00 .._. _._._...COMPUTER.SOFTWARE. _,. .. U84216 THE JANITOR-S SHOPPE $509.06 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 084217 JOHNSON 0 JOHNSON $60.73 REFUND USE CHARGE @0$IP,,, „ , _ ... •XAMAN BEARINGS @. SUPPL.Y..__._.. ._._.._..�._._ -32.1.e.34 ._—...MECHANICAL SUPPLIES_....__. ....... ..... __.._.. _ 084219 HAS SAFETY PRODUCTS $69.91 SAFETY SUPPLIES 084220 • KIND REAPING. INC. 12.206.03 BEARINGS/MECHANICAL PARTS l __089221 KRAFT FOODS . .. .. .. . .. .. . $1P5,279.98 .. ...... .... . _... REFUND USE.CHAROE. .. 084222 KHIKSET DIVISION 3,086.50 REFUND USE CHARGE ' 089223 L 8 N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO $9.135.32 UNIFORM RENTAL ." 8,122A _ LAURSEN COLOR LAB ... .... . ...._. . . .$11,93 ..., .,._..._.F I LN.PROCESS ING .__.._..__.....___ OR 9225 LERN CR PHOTO. INC. �� i137.68 FILM PROCESSING ' 084226 LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. '$1.676.65 LIGHTING FUND NO 9149 - JT DIST WORAIING,CAPITAL PROCESSING DAEE 1/15/87 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 .-_-._... __.......... ... .. .. ._ . EouNL.sAN7TA71.DN..._ I.C_U_.QF._DR AN,GE. CQWj ' CLAIMS r v 01/21/87 - -- .......-.._-. __._W,ARI. NiNO.,., VENDOR _ AMOUNT DESCRIPTION + 084227 LILLY TYPESETTING $27.30 PRINTING ;! OM 4Y2D.._..,_ . . LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION. COM N„.,"„______ ____ _„ j2$O.OP _ LAFCO PROCESSING FEE + "842Y9 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1_.017.50 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/INSTRUMENTATION EQUIP 004230 LOS ANGELES TIMES $3.474.31 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING ,_,__,0D4231 LOS ANGELES TIMES _ _ _ ....... $_11564163 .,, CLASS,IFIFD,_ADVERTISING 2 DR4232 MBL INDUSTRIES ' $386.80 REFUND USE CHARGE " 084233 M.G. INDUSTRIES 1752.86 TESTING EQUIPMENT/SPECIALTY GASES !+ OB4234_._. HAS SYSTEMS . INC. 1149 E ECTRICAL PARTS '+ 084235 MARV AC ELECTR 0NIC8 1373.09 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES '• 084236 MCNINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP $68.20 TRUCK PARTS 4__9842£7__.................. M.C, P FOODS 11.7011.5.3-.__"_.__._.____RE FUND_USE_CNAIIGE _ . _ '._ 084238• MICE.L. INC. $38.39 REFUND USE CHARGE 084239 MILE SQUARE APARTMENTS 1192.13 REFUND USE CHARGE !! 084240 MILER. f. WEAVER __ __ 317.07_ REFUND USE CNAflGE '. 064P41 MINUTEMAN PUMPING � $142.31 LIABILITY CLAIM SETTLEMENT 084242 MOBIL CHEMICAL CO. 3126.04 REFUND USE CHARGE _' D4243....._-_. _..ROOMS 084244 MOORE BUSINESS CENTER 926.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES X 084245 MOORE f TABER $636.20 ENGINEERING SERVICES + ' 084246 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY 9108.89 VEHICLE PARTS___-_,,,__. , NATI CN6L BRNITAR7 SUPPIt_ i217.51 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES +� t47 08424A NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY 01 $7,735.45 REFUND USE CHARGE + . 08409 � .,, .NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 02 -Ili _ _AEFONQ U£€.OHARG,E„"__ ..,�-.._ii _ _.__..._._-_. ..__.-_._ .. ._... 089450 NATIONAL 7ECHN01.0 G7 p5 $332.57 REFUND USE CHARGE to 084251 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY N6 S466.90 REFUND USE CHARGE ' 1 084252 NELSON-DUNN. INC. SE_2s19_ RNINE_PAE7£ 004254 REMARK CP _ f91.28 INSTRUMENTATION_PARTS 0925 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5 WATER USAGE 064255 NORTHROP CORP.. 42._........,__._-JIEFONO.USE CHARGE_._ 064256 NULTH CENTRAL EMOR. $139.31 INSTRUMENT 084257 O.M.S. $760.00 TRASH DISPOSAL " OD 4250, „ . OCCIDENTAL, CHEMICAL LQRE3__ E3.35.T2135..- AU3IlC SODA C 084269 ORANGE I USA $32.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 689260 ORANGE COUNTY EQUIPMENT CO. $128.89 TOOLS !'._,.". ...084261 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE, , . ......_.. ..._....._....__...._.,.__ _..D16B-65__,_ ,, ._ ____ELECTRICAL_PARTS 004262 ORANGE. VALVE f FITTING CO. $5,324.04 PIPE SUPPLIES u 084263 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $531.20 WATER PRODUCTION ;i 0842f4 '�PACO PUMPS _ $291.51 PUMP PART$__" „_,",__,_",,,,__........ ..._...... .._.....____ " .." �+ 089265 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CU. $650.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 084266 PACIFIC BELL f191.70 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES + .._,_._084267 PADGETT - THOMPSOR ... . _ ..... .. . .. ..... ... $65.00 .. . . ... .."...__ . TRAINING. _ ". .. 084268 PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL L CO. $554.00 PETTY CASH AUDIT" 084269 PENNWALT CORP. $428.26 REFUND USE CHARGE _MAR70, PHO70 3 SOUND CO. .. ... " .. . ... .... .................. .066.60 ... .____.. ._.. .. OFFICE_MACRINE/QFFICE,EQUIPMENT 084271 PITNEY BOWES 6122.43 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 084272 PLACENTIA LINDA COMM. HOSPITAL $953.90 REFUND USE CHARGE FUND NO 9199 - JT DISI WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/15187 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 4ORMIL-6ABITMO.DI STR IC.tA_QF.ORANGE CLAIMS PAID Ol/21/eT i i YAR.NANT NO, VENDOR _ . . ._._..,... ANO,UNT.. . _ .. . _ ._ _... .DESCRIPTION i 094273 POSTMASTER 6209.26 REFUND USE CHARGE 084274 POSTMASTER _ $232.08 ,,.,_ ,__ REFOND'k1 E CHARGE + 004276 PRECISION ECISIONRY BARN S3B1.35 REFUND USE SUPPLIES . 08427E PN EC ISI ON ANODIZING 5127.93 REFUND USE CHARGE a__.__08_4277 _. . HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE _ __. .. . ...__.._.. fA O.OD _. _ICE. _. . 084279 PROCESS COMPONENTS CO..TNC. SI70.43 EQUIPMENT PARTS 084P79 PULASKI S ARITA ARCHITECTS $14,309.11 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVILE J-7-4 ii 084280 RCC_VALVE. REPAIR._._ $P/Z.A¢_ n 084202 CLIFFORD RAOUSINTER - 119.07 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE OB92PT. RAFF ER TY INTERNATIONAL 7PULKS SI13.53 TRUCK PARTS ....__._._ .RAINBOW DISPOSAL,.CO. __14RR.A0____ __TRASH. DISPOSAL--.,-.----.. .._. ...__ .a 084284 RAYAL ENGRAVERS INC. $39.31 REFUND USE CHARGE 084285 INLAKO FACTORS L FINANCE $131.47 ENGINE PARTS is 84286 THE_REM-TEe.._._____ $ .12 LEGAL ADVERTISING _ 0842 THE RCF'UBL IC SUPPLY CO. 6 . PIPE SUPPLIES 089288 8tl RICH LIFE, INC. 5539539.1313 REFUND USE CHARGE +�-oB 9289_._._..._RICH aso•9 HYDRAULIC$------ . sl kaT n 684290 RICOH CORPORATION $141.37 COPIER LEASE +a Ell 084291 ROMES AUTO TRIM S142.00 TRUCK REPAIR a7X 084292 JQ SEFN,T._R1' ER$ON S_SON1l NC. S339.20 Plg._SUpPLIEB ___ .,, ?_ ._+ 084293 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS 1809.84 ELECTRIC MOTOR to 084294 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTIL $151.257.71 OCEAN MONITORING . _Q84293..._.__..._.._,...NILLIAM J.. SCOTT_ . __ S74.ak6-__ REFUNQ_USE-QHARGGE__... a -4 084296 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $370.00 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL EXAMS a CO 084297 SLIDE MAKERS WEST S192.86 SLIDES 1 08_92_98.__.__._._.SM iTN,-E MERY SOe_..__._. S348.g0 CONCRETE VESTING _ 084300 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $$11.892.35 POWER NATURAL +a 084300 SO. CAL. GAS CO. f11.892.35 NATURAL CAS a_054301 SO. CALIF., YAT.FR .CO.__ S24a %___... WATER 0843112 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $3,820.79 DIESEL FUEL 084303 SPFEOE SPEEDOMETER $131.96 TRUCK REPAIR STATEFA CONTPOL._$YSTEA55_. I)_US RR__ PNEUMATLC AL TUATORS_______,___ _ 084105 Sf A40V STEEL :226.85 STEEL T. C84306 STAR TOOL S SUPPLY CO. 615.33 TOOLS/SAFETY SUPPLIES •_,._._, 089307 STEE LCaSE . ..... ... .._._..._,.___.___. _.i21.A 69.T.R 1__ ._. _..-__.__... .REFUND.USE CHARGE_. 084308 STEELING OPTICAL $182.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES + 084309 SIETTLER. KURT/COIN LAUNDRY - $4.23 REFUND USE CHARGE SUPER CHE.M CORP_._..... El_a219e 28_._.... ._-.AANITORIAL.SUPPL_IE$ PM __.._.._.__.. 084311 THE SUPPLIERS $586.07 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 084312 SUR-LITE CORPORATION $21.190.05 ' GAS BURNERS PW-121-1 _•.--._084313_. SVEETLAND CO. .. _. . __.._ ... ... . . ....__._,.$19.83 .... .. .. ._ _ _. . PIPE SUPPLIES _. ._. _ 084314 TAYLOR-DUNN $286.58 TRUCK PARTS 084315 TENNECO OIL CO. S291.37 REFUND USE CHARGE _ _000316,..- ... _ . TOMMY\\S SPANISH FOODS 084317 TONY+S LOCK S SAFE SERVICE S164.44 LOCKSMITH SERVICES 084318 TOWNSEND APARTMENTS $176.77 REFUND USE CHARGE FUND NO 91?9 - JT GIST YORNING •CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 1115187 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AF43 ._ _.._c 9.VNSY_sANIT?1.IQH_ IF1t.J -011ANQE._ 9lIx TV CLAIMS PP . E A D 01/21/87 _ -- --- i + WARRANT„NO.. VENDOR ... .. ........ .... 4ROUNT..._ .. _... . ..... _... DESCRIPTION . . ._ + 064319 TRANSCMEM S1B7.33 REFUND USE CHARGE ! 064320.___.. TRUCKS AUTO SUPPLY",.INC S____---_ }2192P 557___ ,•,_____.TRUCR.PARTS_____ __ _ " 084321 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT S28.50 HEMBERSHIP FEES " 094322 UNOCAL S51.73 GASOLINE UNITED PARCEL SERVICE ._._..PELIVERY SWIM. ... . 084324 U.S. EQUIPMENT CO.. INC. $1.921.40 EQUIPMENT PARTS OP4325 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR f290.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 084326 _ UNIVERSAL MACM i OB 4327 VWP. SCIENTIFIC $1,316.19 LAB SUPPLIES ' C84328 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 1191.65 PIPE SUPPLIES �: f9932R..._. ._...__........VCRTEA BVSSINESs .1 NTE P..I QRg sA,nik _ 96,._ QFEICE..FUBNLTURE �. 084330 JOHN R. WAPLES S447.97 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT 064331 CARL WARREN L CO. $300.00 WORKERS COMP ADMINSTRATION 084332 WATER. POLLUTION..CONTROL_____ 5635.00,_, CONE€RENfE_ 0800J7 WEAVER. fRRL M PROP ERTIfS $147.95 REFUND USE CHARGE R84334 WEAVER S WEAVER S435.57 REFUND USE CHARGE �i_084335_.._... .WEST.;QAST ANWT.ICAL.3.RY3._. — $Aul 99_._---1R@.3ERY1.E€S_—.—_....__.. __.. 084356 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $4.325.41 CAUSTIC SODA + M 084337 THE WESTIN SOUTH COAST PLAZA $5.644.94 REFUND USE CHARGE x 43iie_.___—.RE RQ3..S QRP.._.............._.._.._____ F1.S690012—_ r-i 084339 YUNN[R. MORTON 6 DOLLEY $156.33 REFUND USE CHARGE CO 084340 ZIP TEMPORARY PERSONNEL $206.15 TEMPORARY SERVICES " tz TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01/21/87 S4.742.862.14 i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/15/87 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY i —SUMMARY .. __. ...AMOUNT •_ jI. OPER_FUND 13.78 /P OPER FUND • 12 ACO FUND 39.49 • _._.12 F/R Fund _ 14.25 —_ ____.__ .. .. . ._._._.. ._....___ _.___.__ ._.___.._....... . . ._ ._.. .__ w /9 OPER FUND 1 ,83 9 r. 1 IS OPER FUND , 1.834.55 ACO FUND .._._._.—. �,744.55__- /6 OPER FUND __._... _._ _. /7 OPER FUND 2,802.06 '• 17.F/R,FUND __�....... ___..—._.......__� . .9.16.20 1596 OPER FUND 770.82 --_--�-- -- '- '-'- /566 ACO FUND 232.36 ie II OPER_.FUND. 6,674.96 to JT OPEN FUND -_.._—_._......_._.__ ._.._._ U4155376v- •__ /x COxsi FUND - ----- 1,665,541.91 _13_00NST Fuxo_ .. 1,8W,65o}7 _. 7 rn CORr X SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 1,215.11 �• JT NORKING-CAPITAL 307 0022.94 7..,../ _.____._.. .. .. ._... ..TOTAL.C41MS.PAID. N1/41L91__—AMA"O ? 1� 4_ :• CO I "OARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Past Offlcs S. 8127 of Orange County, California 108" Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Tslephmus: Am Cods 714 JOINT BOARDS 952-2411 AGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS MARCH 11, 1987 - 7 :30 P.M. The following item(s) are hereby agendized for discussion and action by the Board(s) of Directors at the regular meeting date and time set forth above. This Supplemental Agenda was posted more than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time and complies with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2 DISTRICT 1 (15) (a) Consideration of acceptance of sum of $5 ,000.00 as settlement and release of claim by District against Phil' s Custom Plating in the amount of $5,237.80 for outstanding invoices owed to the District, as recommended by General Counsel. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN ,.� MARCH 11 , 1987 1> COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS SINCE THE RECENT TURNOVER IN BOARD MEMBERSHIP, I HAVE ENDEAVORED TO FILL VACANCIES THAT HAVE BEEN LEFT ON SOME OF THE BOARDS' COMMITTEES BY RETIRING DIRECTORS. I WOULD LIKE TO APPOINT DIRECTOR BUCK CATLIN TO FILL THE VACANCY ON THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF, WHICH WILL BRING THAT COMMITTEE BACK TO FULL MEMBERSHIP. AS I REPORTED TO YOU LAST MONTH, WE ARE ALSO APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE CITIES OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND NEWPORT BEACH TO SERVE AS AD HOC MEMBERS ON THE COMMITTEE FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF WORKING ON OCEAN DISCHARGE MATTERS. I HAVE DISCUSSED THIS WITH THE MAYORS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND NEWPORT BEACH. AND AM PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE THAT: DIRECTOR TOM MAYS WILL REPRESENT THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DIRECTORQjk-Q)MaL. WILL REPRESENT THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE - . -1- 2) UPCOMING MEETINGS AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE LISTING ON THE AGENDA MEETING NOTICE, MARCH WILL BE A BUSY MONTH FOR OUR BOARDS ' COMMITTEES. A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18, AT 5:30 P.M. TO BEGIN WORK ON JOINT WORKS BUDGETS FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR. B. BUILDING COMMITTEE: ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19, THE BUILDING COMMITTEE WILL MEET AT 5 :30 P.M. TO WRAP UP ITS WORK ON THE ADDITION TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING. THE COMMITTEE WILL ALSO BE LOOKING AT: 1. THE DRAFT MASTER PLAN OF SUPPORT FACILITIES AND LANDSCAPING FOR PLANT NO. 2 2. THE PROPOSED NEW MAIN ENTRANCE AT THE FREEWAY ON/OFF RAMP FOR PLANT NO. 1 . C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25, AT 5:30 P.M. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: URSUL ENNEDY Ct yOW WILLIAM MAHONEY AND OR OR GENE LEYTON PHILIP MAURER OR TOM MAYS - ITEM 2 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE - -2- D. DISTRICT 2 ADJOURNED MEETING: ON THURSDAY, MARCH 26, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF DISTRICT NO. 2 WILL MEET AT 7:30 P.M. TO REVIEW PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ITS MASTER PLAN OF TRUNK SEWERS, AND THE DRAFT EIR FOR THE AMENDMENT. E. SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF: THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF WILL MEET ON TUESDAY, MARCH 31, AT 5:30 P.M. -3- MEETING DAME_ March 11, 1987 TIME 7:30 P.N.DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11 , 13 b 14 DISTRICT 1 30INT BOARDS (SALTARELLI)...MOESTEREY... (PICKLER)........BAY.........J� (CRANK)........HANSON...... (HORSY)..........CATLIN....... (YOUNG)........GRISET...... fRISNERI.........CLLFT........ (ROTE).........STANTON.....� (PLUMMET..........CULVER......��_ (PERRY)..........EDGAR....... DISTRICT2 (MALTARE.........FAWN....... — (MURP"Y).........FRb88.......� _ (NORBY)........CATLlN..... (MC CONE)....... .GRIFFIN.....�(�_ (WEDEL)........MAHONEY.....�� �_ (YOUNG)..........ORI3ET...... . (PICHLER)......SAY.........J�� (CRANK)..........HANSON........ (MURPHY).......FMIB..... (COX)........ HART........JC� (YOUNG)........GRISET......JL� _ (SALTARELLI).....HUES TEREY...J'_ (NELSON).......LEYTO.......J� (CORONADO).......KAREL........ (SCOTT)........NEAL........ _ (WINCMELL).......KELLY......... (DOWNEY).......NEWTON......,y` (SALTARELLI).....XENNEDY.....•,i_ (CULVER).......PERRY.......JC (NELSON).........LEYTON....... (FASEEMDER)....SILZEL...... (WEDEL)..........MAHONEY.....��_ (PEREZ)........SMITH....... (PLUMMER)........MAURER....... (ROTH).........STANTON..... (GREEN)..........MAYS.... ....1� (ABRAM)..........MILLER......�� DISTRICT 3 (BIGONGERI.......MURPHY...... � (SCOTT)..........HEAL........ (HERMAN).......Plblf• ......� (SUTTON).........NELSON. .....JC_ (WEISHAUPT)....SAPIEN........ (DOWNEY)........ .NEWTON......J� (PICKLER)......BAY.........ys (CULYER).........PERRY....... (NORSY)........CATLIN....... (HERMAN).........PBNlB....... (RISNER).......CLIFT........ (WEISHAUPT)......SAPIEN...... (PERRY)........CULVER......�.0 (WILES)..........SIEFEN...... (MC CUNE)......GRIFFIN.....Jj� _ (FASSENOER)......SILZEL......�,� (YOUNG)........GRISET......fC_ _ (PEREZ)..........SMITH.......yG (CORONADO).....KAREL......... _ _ (ROTH)....:......STANTON....... (WINCHELL).....KELLY....... (NELSON).........SUTTON...... (WEDEL)........MAHONEY..... (MILLER).........SWAN........ (SCOTT)........NEAL........JC _ _ (SELVAGG1).......SYLVIA......J�_ (SUTTON).......NELSON....... _ (GREEN/IOHNSON)..WAHNER......y. (WILES)........SIEFEN......JA� (ROT").........STANTON........ (SELVAGGI).....SYLVIA......�. STAFF: DISTRICT $ SYLVESTER CLARKE....... CURKE......J. (PLU)..........HART COX.........JG ANDERSON.....U� (PLUME.)......STANTON..... ,i. BUTLER -A—, (RO7H).........STNNTON.....J�_ BROWN.:.....J—, BAKER.......�G C�aa.Ra DI$TRICT f BAKER....... _ N ..... ( LUMME )...... ARER....... VON LANGER (P R ......MAURER...... $I ...... (ROTH)......... STANTON..... . REED JL �r+H(aMei. CLAWSON.....JG COTER.......J— DI$TRICT 7 LINDER......yG - LINOER......_ (SµAM)...I....MILLER...... ✓ DEBLIEUx...._ (MMMMER)......COX.......... (PLUME........COX.......... (YOUNG)........SMISET TH.......J�_ (ROTH))........STANTON.....jC (ROTE).........MANNER......JC ' (6REEN)........WAXNER......✓_ _ DISTRICT L1 (WINCHELL).....KELLY....... (ROTH).........STANTON ...... — (GREEN)........MAYS........ J�_ DISTRICT 13 OTHERS: WOODRUFF.... ✓ � ATKINS...... (NELSON).......SUTTON......✓ HOHEMER.....J�� (SIGONGER).....MURPHY.......IG_ _ HOWARD......�� (PICKLER)......SAY......... HUNT........ (PEREZ)........SMITH..... _ KEITH....... (ROTH).........STANTON.....J�_ _ KNOPF.......�� - LE BLANC...._ DISTRICT lA LINDSTROM— �'�✓ LYNCH......._ (AGRAN)........MILLER...... ✓_ _ MARTINSON—_ (MILLER).......SWAN........JC_ PEARCE...... (SALTARELLI)...KENNEDY...... C_ WASOM....... (PEREZ).......:SMITH....... v YOUNG....... (ROTE).........STANTON.... OLII/87 JOINT BOARD MEETING MARCH II , 1987 NAME AGENCY/ORGANIZATION � � ' MARCH 11, 1987 JOINT [BEEPING NOTES #5 - Public Comient Paul Torres identified himself and stated that he had a question for the Hoard. He asked if he, as a citizen of Orange County, had the right to address the Board regarding some concerns he had. He was told yes, he had that right and was asked to hold his comments to five minutes. He indicated he didn't want to speak that evening but wondered hoe he could get on the agenda. The Joint Chairman advise him that he could talk to the staff or he would be happy to discuss whatever matter he was concerned with. #6(a) - Report of Joint Chairman SEE ATTACHED REPORT. #6(b) - Report of the General Manager The General Manager reported on Agenda Item #9(c) relative to approval of plans and specifications for Job No. J-15, Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $28 million. It will probably be the second largest contract awarded by the Districts. The Advanced Treatment Facility at Plant No. 2 implemented in 1981 was the largest. Next is the Advanced Treatment Facility at Plant No. 1. the total cost of the booster station is $35 million. Tan Dawes then addressed the Hoard and briefly described the project. He said �..i it began in 1981 when the Districts undertook changes in their Master Plan. We recognized that the changes were substantial and we would have to pump additional flows soon. In 1983 when we had a severe storm and received 440 M3D. We were able to handle it with nine pumps and all standby equipment in service. At the new station with four or five props will be able to handle greater amounts than that. Have issued several contracts to date to implement this project. He showed a picture of the treatment plant and new pump station and described the way it would look and dimensions. We have already awarded a contract for the pins and motors with GE in the amount of $4 million. He also showed a scale model drawing of the pump station. Each pump can handle 120 MD. The cost of the pump station is $28 million. Total project cost is $35 million. We are allowing 26 months for construction of this station. Hope to have it completed by 1989-90. We will include a bonus of $240,000 for early completion if completed four months early. The General Manager added that in the next two years we will be caning to the Directors with four major projects: (1) New Plant No. 1 Headworks - $37 million (2) Additional Primary Treatment at Plant No. 1 - $36 million (3) Central Paver General Facilities - $53 million (4) Odor Control Facilities covering clarifiers and air scrubber systems at both plants - $20 million. TOTAL - $150 million. Plus additional small projects up to $10 million each. Mr. Sylvester stated that the General Counsel would camnent on the one Supplemental Agenda item. `..i It was announced that all agencies were represented that evening. #6(c) - Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported re District l's Supplemental Agenda Item No. 15(a) regarding settlement of a claim involving an Industrial Waste permittee, Phil's Custom Plating. He advised that over a couple years ago metal changing shop incurred various use charges and penalties. We received no cooperation at all and finally they went out of business. cos heard they were trying to start a business elsewhere. The Districts had previously filed a lawsuit regarding these fees. They have now paid $5,000 of the $5,237.80 owed, a large portion of which was penalty assessments. He said he thought it was a very attractive settlement and recommended acceptance. It was then moved, seconded and carried to approve the item. Director Hoesterey asked if there are any questions on the Districts' permit application form as to whether individuals have been convicted of violations? Tan Woodruff replied no, it is a very delicate subject. He added that the Engineering Dept., Operations, Maintenance and I.W. staffs have been working with his office and will be caning back to the Board with five-year revisions to our I.W. Ordinance, and one thing they are looking at is permit procedures and forms, so will address this. -2- a./ REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN MARCH 11 , 1987 1> COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS SINCE THE RECENT TURNOVER IN BOARD MEMBERSHIP, I HAVE ENDEAVORED TO FILL VACANCIES THAT HAVE BEEN LEFT ON SOME OF THE BOARDS ' COMMITTEES BY RETIRING DIRECTORS. I WOULD LIKE TO APPOINT DIRECTOR BUCK CATLIN TO FILL THE VACANCY ON THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF, WHICH WILL BRING THAT COMMITTEE BACK TO FULL MEMBERSHIP. AS I REPORTED TO YOU LAST MONTH, WE ARE ALSO APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE CITIES OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND NEWPORT BEACH TO SERVE AS AD HOC MEMBERS ON THE COMMITTEE FOR THE ..✓ SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF WORKING ON OCEAN DISCHARGE MATTERS. I HAVE DISCUSSED THIS WITH THE MAYORS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND NEWPORT BEACH, AND AM PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE THAT: DIRECTOR TOM MAYS WILL REPRESENT THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DIRECTORQ12 �Ma.aw+ WILL REPRESENT THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE - -1- 2) UPCOMING MEETINGS AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE LISTING ON THE AGENDA MEETING NOTICE, MARCH WILL BE A BUSY MONTH FOR OUR BOARDS' COMMITTEES. A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18, AT 5:30 P.M. TO BEGIN WORK ON JOINT WORKS BUDGETS FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR. B. BUILDING COMMITTEE: ON THURSDAY, MARCH 19, THE BUILDING COMMITTEE WILL MEET AT 5:30 P.M. TO WRAP UP ITS WORK ON THE ADDITION TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING. THE COMMITTEE WILL ALSO BE LOOKING AT: 1 . THE DRAFT MASTER PLAN OF SUPPORT FACILITIES AND „r LANDSCAPING FOR PLANT NO. 2 2. THE PROPOSED NEW MAIN ENTRANCE AT THE FREEWAY ON/OFF RAMP FOR PLANT NO. 1. C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY , MARCH 25, AT 5:30 P.M. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: URSUN,KENNEDY L u WILLIAM MAHONEY AND OR OR GENE LEYTON PHILIP MAURER OR TOM MAYS - ITEM 2 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE - -2- D. DISTRICT 2 ADJOURNED MEETING: ON THURSDAY, MARCH 26, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF DISTRICT NO. 2 WILL MEET AT 7:30 P.M. TO REVIEW PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ITS MASTER PLAN OF TRUNK SEWERS, AND THE DRAFT EIR FOR THE AMENDMENT. E. SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF: THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF WILL MEET ON TUESDAY, MARCH 31, AT 5:30 P.M. -3- `.✓ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 31 5, 6, 71 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON Y a MARCH 11, 1987 P�1lTAilo V �/ ii a ao9otima pO^�ISIN N ORgNGE COV� ADMINISTRATIPE OFFICES 10844 ELLI3 AVENUE FGi,.,'fAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on March 11, 1987, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and: invocatio.. the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts..Nos.. 1, 2, R, 5., 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as fella..: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman _Donald J. Saltarelli =Robert Ranson, Chairman pro tem _Orris Creek z Dan Geiser Dan Young =Roger Stearns _Don Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: x Buck Catlin, Chairman _Chris Norby z William 0. Mahoney, Chairman pro tam _Dorothy Wesel —x—Ben Bay Iry Pickier Irwin Fried x J. Todd Murphy x Den Geiser Den Young z _ Gene A. Layton _Caney Nelson x Jame. Neal _George Scott x Arthur G. Newton _Carol Downey =Bob Perry _Norman Culver =Wayne Silsal _James T. Fasbender x Don Smith Jess Perez _Roger Stanton _Don Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: Richard Polis, Chairman z Larry Herman x Sal Sapien, Chairman pro tam _Martha Weishaupt x Ben Bay _Iry Pickier x Buck Catlin Chris Herby x Frank Clift _Joyce Risnar =Norman Culver _Bob Perry z Don Griffin _Rhonda J. McCune x Dan Geiser _Dan Young x John Kenai _Cornelius M. Coronado z Jack Kelly _Grace Winchall x William D. Mahoney Dorothy Wedel x James Neal —George Scott =Cerrey Nelson _John H. Sutton J.R. 'Bob" Siafen _Dewey Wiles x Roger Stanton Don Roth z Charles Sylvia _Anthony Selvaggi DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman _John C. Cox, Jr. John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman pro cam Ruthelyn Plummer —;-Roger Stanton _Don Roth DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Hatter, Chairman _Eric C. Johnson _A.Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tam Ruthelyn Plummer z Roger Stanton _Don Roth DISTRICT NO. 7: x Richard Edgar, Chairmen _Donald J. Saltarelli =Sally Anne Millar, Chairman prd tam _Leery Agran xJohn C. Cox, Jr. _Ruthelyn Plummer x Dan Driest _Dan Young a Don Smith _Jess Perez ` =Roger Stanton Don Roth x James Wahnar _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Jack Kelly, Chairman _Grace Winchell z Tom Mays, Chairman pro tam Peter Green xRoger Stanton _Don Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: xJohn H. Sutton, Chairman _Garrey Nelson x J. Todd Murphy, Chairman pro tam Roland E. Big....r x De„ Bay _Iry Pickier z Don Smith Jess Perez _Roger Stanton _Don Roth DISTRICT NO. 14: xSally Anne Miller, Chairman _Larry Agran =Peer A. Swan, Chairman pro cam Darryl Miller x Ursula Kennedy Donald J. Saltarelli ianm� x Don Smith _Jess Perez x Roger Stanton _Don Roth -2- 03/11/87 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne .Sylvester; General:Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, .Thom $ M. Dawes, William N. Clarke, .Blake Anderson, Bill Butler, Penny Kyle, Gary Streed, Corinne - Clawson, Rich von Langan, Chuck Winsor, Bot` Ooten, John Linder, Judy Bucher, Hahin 1-�/ Talebi, Martin Holl OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Conrad Hobener, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Nancy Skinner, Ron Young, Gary Ryan, Paul Torres ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Mr. Paul Public comment Torres of Irvine, and addressed his inquiry relative to the procedure to be followed in order for members of the public to present matters to the staff and Joint Boards. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that he had Appointment to Select Committee to appointed Director A.B. "Buck" Catlin to Advise the Staff fill the vacancy on the Select Committee to Advise the Staff. He further announced that, after consulting with the mayors of Huntington Beach and Newport Beach, Director Tom Mays, representing the City of Huntington Beach, and Director Phil Maurer, representing the City of Newport Beach, had been appointed as ad hoc members of the Committee for the specific purpose of working on ocean discharge matters. ALL DISTRICTS Following the announcement of committee Report of the Joint Chairman appointments, the Joint Chairman reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, March 18th, at 5:30 p.m. , to begin work on the Joint Works budgets for the next fiscal year. Mr. Griffin announced that the Building Committee would meet on Thursday, March 19th, at 5:30 p.m., to conclude its work on the addition to the Administration Building. The Committee would also be reviewing the Draft Master Plan of Support Facilities, Site and Security Improvements at Plant Mo. 2, as well as the proposed new Plant No. 1 main entrance at the 405 Freeway southbound on/offramp. He then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, March 25th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Gene Layton and William Mahoney to attend and ' participate in the discussions. Chairman Griffin advised that District No. 2 would be adjourning to Thursday, March 26th, at 7:30 p.m., to review proposed Amendment No. 1 to its Master Plan of Trunk Sewers and the Draft Environmental Impact Report for said Amendment. Mr. Griffin also reported that the Select Committee to Advise the Staff was scheduled to meet on Tuesday, March 31st, at 5:30 p.m. -3- 03/11/87 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented on the - - - - Report of the General Manager - - agenda item:for approval, of.plans- and_. :- . . . _. . . . . _ specifications--for:construction-of-the : _. __.. new Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15. The \.w/ Engineer's estimate for construction of this project is $28 million but when major equipment procurement and surge tower improvements being contracted for separately are added on, the total project cost will be $35 million. He noted that this will probably be the second largest contract ever awarded by the Districts. The Districts' Director of Engineering then gave a brief overview of the project. He reported that in the 1983 update of the Districts' Joint Works Master Plan it became apparent that major changes would be required to provide for substantially-increased wastewater flows in the near future. Mr. Dawes reviewed renderings of the proposed station. He noted that the new pumping station will handle 480 million gallons per day, and said the project is expected to take 26 months and is targeted for completion by 1989-90. Following completion of Booster Station "C", Booster Station "A" (Rothrock) will be decommissioned and Booster Station "B" (Foster) will be refurbished. The General Manager also reviewed four major upcoming master planned projects to be awarded within the next two years at an estimated total cost of $150 million. In addition, Mr. Sylvester advised the Boards that several smaller projects would also be forthcoming. Total treatment plant improvements are estimated to cost more than $300 million over the next seven to ten years. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported on the Report of the General Counsel Supplemental Agenda item for District No. 1 regarding acceptance of settlement amount and release of claim by District against Phil's Custom Plating for outstanding invoices owed to the District for industrial user charges and penalties. Mr. Woodruff advised that a lawsuit had been filed against the firm which subsequently went out of business. They have submitted payment in the amount of $5,000.00 in lieu of the $5,237.80 owed, and the General Counsel recommended acceptance of this sum as settlement of the claim. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 11, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments _ Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held held February 11, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 11, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 11, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be tleemed approved, as mailed. -4- 03/11/87 DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments- - Approval of Minutes - to the minutes of the regular meeting - held February 11-, 1987, the Chairman - - --- - ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. 1 ' DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 11, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 11, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 11, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 11, 1987, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. �a►' 2/04/87 2/18/87 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 319,767.89 $ 280,545.75 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,704,179.37 106,486.47 Joint Working Capital Fund - 69,780.18 199,832.83 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 4,954.44 13,859.28 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 8,280.00 -0- DISTRICT NO. 2 - 9,812.85 5,174.71 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 2,540.80 25,931 .96 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 22,753.80 14,875.96 DISTRICT No. 6 - 206.84 -0- DISTRICT NO. 7 - 92,171.20 7,934.40 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 3,587.41 8,075.88 ' DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - -0- -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 5 6 6 JOINT - 6,536.91 2,482.09 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 3,473.7^ -0- $2,248,045.41 $ 665,199.33 -5- 03/11/87 ALL DISTRICTS : - -- Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Wood. Shevings Sawdust, Specification No. P-096, That the bid tabulation and to Artesia Sawdust Products, Inc. recommendation re award of purchase order contract for Purchase of Wood Shavings/Sawdust, Specification No. P-096, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Artesia Sawdust Products, Inc. for the price of $5.25 per yard plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning March 15, 1987, with provision for a one-year extension (estimated annual cost $78,750.00 plus sales tax). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Liquid Cationic Polyelec ymetrolyte Chemical That the bid tabulation and Flocculent (Polr) , Specification recommendation re award of contract for No. P-097, to Allied Corporation, Purchase of Liquid Cationic Engineered Materials Sector Polyelectrolyte Chemical Flocculent (Polymer) , Specification No. P-097, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Allied Corporation, Engineered Materials Sector, for the price of $0.049 per wet pound plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning April 13, 1987, with provision for four one-year extensions (estimated annual cost $701,591.80 plus sales tax). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. J-15 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 87-18, approving plans and specifications for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications re Job That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and No. J-6-2 specifications for Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2, authorizing an addition of $7,785.65 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for relocation of a transformer in Foster Power Building, purchase and installation of pull boxes to facilitate replacement of transformers in Power Building "A" and heat shrink tubing over bus connections at Foster Booster Pump Station; and granting a time extension of three (3) calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and Job No. P1-21 specifications for Installation of Replacement of Centrifuges with Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-21, authorizing an addition of $8,423.00 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for additional concrete pile cap demolition work, altering the filter press drain lines and rerouting a water line, ��✓ and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -6- 03/11/87 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: . Approving-Change-Order -No.-1-to the plans and specifications'.re-. .. That Change Order No: I to the plans and Job No. PI-28 and Job No. P2-36 _ specifications for Advanced Primary Treatment Chemical Addition Facilities at Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-28, and Advanced Primary Treatment Chemical Addition Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-36, authorizing an addition of $1,469.00 to the contract with Ziebarth and Alper for removal of undisclosed concrete and installation of temporary polymer system piping, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 9 to the plans and Job No. P2-28-1 specifications for Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28-1, authorizing an addition of $12,001.00 to the contract with Ziebarth and Alper for modification of plant water piping serving the five new filter presses, purchase and installation of a base saddle support at Scrubber "L", removal of undisclosed equipment, and rerouting lines not shown on the drawings, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS - Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chanae Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and Job No. P2-31R specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins A, B, C, H, I, J, R, L, M, N, 0, P and Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R, authorizing an addition of $1,738.00 to the contract with Morley-Ziebarth and Alper, a Joint Venture, for costa to repair Basin "L" scum trough pipe and for District-requested delays relative to sandblasting work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: `•►' Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 5 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Engineering Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum John Carollo Engineers re design of No. 5 to the Engineering Services Jobs Nos. P1-21, P2-28-1 and Agreement with John Carollo Engineers P2-28-2 for design of Installation of Replacement of Centrifuges with Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-21; Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28-1; and Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling, Job No. P2-28-2, providing for preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Manual and initial training for said facilities. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee John Carollo Engineers re design of certification of the final negotiated Job No. P1-20 fee for Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, .Job No. P1-20, for additional design work to accommodate the proposed new plant entrance, new incoming trunk sewer serving Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 and addition of new headworks construction access roads, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, - -7- 03/11/87 FURTHER MOVED: That theBoards of.Directors.hereby. adopt- Resolution No.-:87-19, approving Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Services':Agreement with John Carollo - Engineers for design of Headworks.-No; 2,.at:Plant.No; 1.;:Job No. P1-20, for additional design work to accommodate the proposed new plant entrance, new `J incoming trunk sewer serving Districts.Nos. .6, 7 and 14 and addition of new headworks construction access roads, on an hourly-rate basis plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $53,060.00, increasing the total maximum compensation from $2,439,455.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,492,515.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo That the Selection Committee Engineers re design of certification of the final negotiated Job No. P1-31 fee with John Carollo Engineers for design of Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 87-20, approving Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, on an hourly-rate basis plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $48,820.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement with That the Selection Committee be, and is Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for consulting hereby, authorized to negotiate an and training services re odor agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for control systems at Plants 1 6 2 consulting services for preparation of Operators' Guides and training services for the odor control scrubber systems at Plant No. 1 and training on the odor control system for the new belt filter press installation at Plant No. 2. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Specification No. M-029 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 87-21, approving plans and specifications for Removal of Grit at Plant No. 2, Specification No. M-029, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part ,of these minutes. - ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve Summary Financial Report for period ending That the staff Summary Financial Report December 31 , 1986 for the six-month period ending December 31, 1986, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. `► -8- 03/11/87 ALL DISTRICTS - - - _ Moved, _seconded and- duly. carried-. _ Receive, file and approve wriLtten report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive. Committee's meeting on February 25, 1987, be, and is hereby, received,. ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Joint Chairman to respond to letter from the City of That the letter from the City of Fountain Valley re Districts' Fountain Valley dated February 6, 1987 master-planned facilities re Districts' master-planned facilities' improvements and expansion at Reclamation Plant No. 1 be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Joint Chairman be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to respond to said letter and meet with City officials, as recommended by the Executive Committee. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing and directing the Joint Chairman to notify the Orange That the Joint Chairman be, and is County Transportation Commission of hereby, authorized .and directed to the Districts' opposition to the notify the Orange County Transportation proposed plan to form an Orange Commission of the Districts' opposition County Freeway Authority to the proposed plan to form an Orange County Freeway Authority to establish a program to divert ad valorem taxes from other public agencies to finance improvements for Orange County's freeway system, and urging the Commission to seek alternative funding sources. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving acceptance of settlement amount and release of claim against That the Board of Directors hereby Phil's Custom Plating accepts the sum of $5,000.00 as settlement and release of claim by District against Phil's Custom Plating in the amount of $5,237.80 for outstanding invoices owed to the District, as recommended by General Counsel. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment . That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m., March 11, 1987. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claims submitted by attorney for Vinod S. That the claims submitted by the Shah attorney for Vinod S. Shah, dated February 3, 1987, and February 5, 1987, for an estimated amount in excess of $100,000.00 for damages allegedly due to false arrest and malicious prosection relative to civil and criminal complaints filed by the District for Industrial Waste Ordinance violations, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claims be, and are hereby, referred to the Districts' liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action. 1 / -9- h, 03/11/87 - DISTRICT 2 Moved, setonde_d and duly. carried: Authorizing staffand General_ . Counsel to .negotiate an agreement That staff and General.Counse2-be,. and: . . - with the City of Garden Grove re are hereby, authorized to negotiate an - Contract No. 2-26-1 agreement with the City of -Garden-Grove relative to a cooperative project in connection with construction of Portion of the Euclid Interceptor Sewer between Lampson Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-1. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement with That the Selection Committee be, and is Willdan Associates re Contract hereby, authorized to negotiate an No. 2-26-1 agreement with Willdan Associates for the preparation of plane and specifications for construction of Portion of the Euclid Interceptor Sewer between Lampson Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-1. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to Thursday, March 26, 1987 at 7:30 p.m., to review proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers and the Draft Environmental Impact Report for said Amendment. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , March 11, 1987. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m., March 11, 1987. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , March 11, 1987. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , March 11, 1987. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: _ Approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 5 to the plane and Contract No. 7-7 specifications for Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7, authorizing a net deduction of $243.65 from the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. , which includes eight items of additional miscellaneous work and grants a time extension of 102 calendar days for completion of said additional work; and assesses the contractor for liquidated damages in the amount of $10,500.00 for twenty-one (21) days between January 22, 1987 and February 12, 1987 at the rate of $500.00 per day, pursuant to the contract provisions, be, and is hereby, approved. `► -10- 03/11/87 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded svdi&r13F—cA —ed::----- - Accepting. Contract No. -7-7 7 - as complete That the Board. of.•DErectora. hereby - - adopts Resolution No. 87-22-7, accepting Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7 as complete, authorizing execution-of Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation and authorizing That the petition from Mr. 6 initiation of proceedings re Mrs. Richard Obering requesting proposed Annexation No. 122 - annexation of 1.13 acres of territory to Obering Annexation the District in the vicinity of Vista Del Lego and is Cuesta Drive in unincorporated County territory, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 87-23-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation No. 122 - Obering Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation and refer to staff for That the petition from Crawford Hills study and recommendation re Development Company requesting Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 annexation of 291.68 acres of territory -_ to the District in the vicinity of Cbapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said request be, and is hereby, referred to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 to County Sanitation District No. 7. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim submitted by Christian Durand That the claim submitted by Christian Durand dated January 28, 1987, for a total amount of $1,219.56 for alleged damages to his vehicle due to a raised manhole cover, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the District's liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , March 11, 1987. -11- v 03/11/87 DISTRICT 11 - - Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for--- _ annexationand refer to staff for That the petition from Signal Bolas study and recommendation re _Corporation requesting annexation of , �✓ proposed Annexation No. 19 - 1,520 acres of territory to the District Signal Bolas Annexation easterly of Pacific Coast Highway surrounded by the City of Huntington Beach, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said request be, and is hereby, referred to staff for study and recommendation, proposed Annexation No. 19 - Signal Bolas Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 11. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , March 11, 1987. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , March 11, 1987. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment - That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , March 11, 1987. Secretary, Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14 -12- AR FUND NO A114 - JI uIST V01AINI CAPITAL I•POCESSING DATE 1/25/R7 fu GF I A REPORT hUMUER AP43 COUNTY SANITA110N DISTRICTS OF ORRNGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID G2/14/87 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ; f.` •1 504353 AIIU PETALS, INC. 1703.1E STEEL AR Nb435A AR< CLEAN $72.17 RAGS 1 U04755 A4f ON :1X OTU%FS ANT NAP 7R f1tl7.02 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES B Pr 356 AOVANCO CONSTRUCIDMS, INC.. 144.855.10 CONTRACTOR 7.7 7b4357 ACP.000MP. INC. 1512.30 INCIHEERING/REFINED EMISSIONS MODELING 5Na 35P AI COLD SUFPLY INC. S212.46 ELECTRICAL PARTS of 4359 AIM PNOOUCTF B fHEMICAL INC. AM.11fi.66 COMPUTER TRAINING/PLANT 2 _ f NA'.FO ALLILO CHEMICAL CORP. $1.055.45 CATIONIC POLYMER . "... Lb4'61 ALPNAGA7 $3,264.58 SPECIALTY GASES r r "( 0BU62 ALLIED SUPFLY CG. C633.31 VALVES i./ (41110 ALL FURY CPIMICAL $48.780.32 CHLORINE PN43H AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH $62.20 ALARM REPAIR " Ecl V4a`65 AMIRICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 1206.71 LAB SUPPLIES nb43E6 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSINUCTION $14.314.49 EXCAVATE 6 REPAIR SUSIEDANCE-GIST 02 � Dk O SE7 THE ANCHOR PACMING CO. $1.661.23 MECHANICAL PARTS C' 5 BA 3EB A-PLUS SYSTEMS 61.817.39 ... .. CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING .. .i. FFI )M45PV APPLIED SPECTR USCOFY S30.60 SUBSCRIPTION J{I X OE4371 AOU4 DEN COLD. $2.124.4E ANIONIC POLYMER CJ "R4371 ASSOCI17ED CONCRYTC PP40,. INC f$60.00 CONSSAMPLIGH.INTERI AL$ PM372 A55INDUSTG LAP ORATORIES INC. 196.10 LAB SAMPLES .4 U64774 NC FALCON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY. 1 .622.74 EQUIPMENT REPAIR G S Lb 4375 FALCON DISFOS AL SERVICE $78.622.70 _ _ SLUDGE SUPPLIES n CO A SEA AMC COMPUTER SUPV L256.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 21;: 414376 ARM SAFETY ! SUPPLY f$22.89 SAFETY SUPPLIES I--• OP4377 L.L. PCMIS TRACTOR ING,' L IMPLEMENT 253.17 EQUIPMENT REPAIR Tel S7P. RENZ LINDUSTRIAL VEMC. $3e3.17 EQUIPMENT PARTS Ob1379 F.EVCC INDUSTRIAL VEnICL F.S fS00.85 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CS.ee� 7F93Fl BIOCYCLi t91.00 SUBSCRIPTION .. .. .. - . . ...-__. __- 1•. nbA 3b1 Blt[x :lox CONE - $157.57 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENTOb 13M2 POLTHC�IIM DATA MIINTCNANCE $2JO.J0 COMPUTER DISK PACK CLEARING E 1 L043M3 PnYLC SNC,.INELMING CORF $35MJ77.93 .. ENGINEERING 7-7. __. ..... _..__. ..._-. UP43C4 PROWN C CALUWELL $277.50 LAB SUPPLIES 9845A6 „HONK L CALDWELL CONSULTINC $19.395.82 ENGINEERING J-19 L R' 2br 3bF JuOY BD Cn YF i]B.BS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE . . _ --_ L PP4797 PUCKEYE GAF PMOOUCIS $3C.59 PROPANE NA SPM PUA xf ENGINEERING CO. $1,135.52 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �. n H41EP WILLIAM D. BUTLFR $353.69 PETTY CASH ...._ . CN43Rii C C P Re CCNU111ONING CO. 4020.04 PUMP REPAIR �. Ctl4391 CAUIKET HARDWARE MFG. S112.72 HARDWARE 1181392 CAL-CHFM SALES $117.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES _ i LE43R3 CAL-GLASS FUR PFSF.AHCH. INC. 16E7.82 LAB SUPPLIES 71.4354 CALTROL , INC. $57.79 REGULATORS SPA:95 cwc, IRc, f231.36 TRUCK PARTS n A115f JONR CAROLLO EN6INCERS $171.145.26 ENGINEERING PI-20,J-15•PI-22,P2-2B _ CP4397 CCNTEL SYSTEMS 12,189.54 COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 08439b CHr MWEET INDUSTRIES, IOC. f21.017.24 FERRIC CHLORIDE . . ' 1 FUND NO 4IR9 - JT GIST W('NXIN(1 CAFITAI. FROCESSING DATE t/2-/07 PAGE 2 A N EIGHT MURDER AP0 ...__. ..._ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ry CLAIMS PAID 32/09/87 - / 1 NARPAN7 NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION , i � 11 ! C L . SEC. $2. 1 . GASOLNE/OIL ObI41.0 COLT SCICNTIFIC. INC. 214.48 LAB SUPPLIES E099C1 COMPASS F: LAROSC ALE $125.58 LANDSCAPING VICESMAIUTENAMCE 9L4902 r.AL CP FwL14X1 LINES f1S5.5B DELIVERY ION MATE 089oKS f.AI MAT 1$217.39 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL SN44:H C0115 OL IOp IEU FLEE INI UL DIST, f1.J52.56 CONSTRICTION MATERIAL �� �� +` PF A405 CG FI96L IUA7 ED REPPGGR AP HI CS 5476.75 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTION .. 7M49 J6 CONTINENTAL LISC. CORP. $531.35 MECHANICAL REPAIR O04A07 CONVNYGA COMPONENTS CO. $1091.26 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i C! OB910R COOFEP ENLACY SERVICES $45.97 MECHANICAL PARTS W4405 CJL'NIY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC SJ.310.52 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SF441G CAL WATER S223.75 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 'CI DL1411 LANKY CURTI TRUCK L EGUIPMFNT 126J.S0 EQUIPMENT RENTAL P04412 ATATE OF CALIF(:Rh1A S16V.00 PROCESSING FEE/ANNEXATION 164 DIST. 02 Y}� CP4113 STATE OF CALIFCRNIA $160.01 PROCESSING FEE/ANNEXATION /67 DIST. 02 . t 031414 O(N TRUCKING 1230.00 _ . DELIVERY SERVICES. ._ . _ ......_ .. rn 'JP4415 ONE.. INC. $1.587.01 ENGINE PARTS ' = PN4416 DANIFLS TIRE SERVICE $1.299.67 TRUCK PARTS i n-' L`L4417 JOI CC ALMEIDA S45).00 PROF. SERV./ESTABLISH COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM...__...._' {'• WBM44IM DECO $1.23203 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ` 04419 OIATEC POLYMERS $16.459.2L CATIONIC POLYMER c w1f -1 181121 OII ILIIPO ASSOCIATES S511.96 . _.... . OFFICE SUPPLIES. .. .I.... .._..._......_..._ n VH4421 UIE'�POSARLC VASTF SYSTLMS. INC. $237.92 EQUIPMENT REPAIR E ' 1 �'�'ON..22 DOMAD ELECTRIC. INC. $50.730.53 CONTRACTOR PI-22-1 r N GEr423 VUP.ACO EN Tf RPRIEES. INC. $6.113.313 INSTALL CHECK VALVES-PLANT 01 ... .. _.. 394424 DORP-OLIVI:K. INC., $791.91 EQUIPMENT PARTS 04499 DUMN EDWARDS CORP. S155.68 PAINT SUPPLIES L G. '• M GU4426 NILh LX FADS S115.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION .. ......_._.....___... t!� LIµ 117 EASTMAN. INC. $1.473.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES +' ONA 4211 EBCHAIIIf R. INC. $3,5041.00 OCEAN MONITOR U6412n EN(INLLRS SALES-SLRVIL'L CO. 13.494.6J PUMP MOTORS ... ._...-.___.. . 1 ' CP4q!!1 1'NVIHONMENIRL NLSOURCE ASSOC. $223.00 LAB SAMPLES 004431 M0511ALL FAINRES f34S.uD DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ; V 04g32 FARA SALES 3 SERVICE S225.40 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 11,4433 fE.Of PAL CXPMESF CORE. f74.00 DELIVERY SERVICES - 't Ep4rH FISCIIEB L POPTFN CO. 1314.32 TRANSMITTER e. Cb4435 FISI•I:R SCIENTIFIC CO. 1121.77 LAB SUPPLIES ._... WN4A36 FLI'.-SY!TEMR $854.36 PUMP PARTS OP4431 GELHL14 PUMPS. INC. 159.56 PUMP PARTS +c ' OP.43U L'LIF DAD A. FOP.KEPT $3,921.60 ENGINEERING/RIGHT OF WAY MAP-PLANT 01 JP643V KUM LD L. FOX L ASS OCT ATL6 61 .65n.40 SAFETY CONSULTANT 1. 2P494K in. FOX00HO E0. S112.55 DELIVERY SERVICES L I I•C4441 FM1.J30w f$51.74 TRUCK PARTS OH r 42 G.W.P. COPEANY SS T.T9 TRUCK PARTS % 1 OL'AV43 CA..A rL LU RYE( CG. $ 28.00 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL v, i 1'P 4411 C4:' Chi'( I'II VLL'[TS . Inc. 34.)2 B.OQ W000 SHAVINGS � M 'Y i P FUND NO 'ili• - J1 01G1 MORKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/29/M7 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP13 COUNTY q&N11ATIUN DIS74ICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID J2/.11/R7 WARRANT NO. VI NEUP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - RMA446 (Ali, ENTR L TELEPHONE INSTALLERS /637.U5 TELEPHONE REPAIR CN4446 CENTRAL TEIEPNOME CO. 32.175.72 TELEPHONE NET WORK CHARGES I.; J84441 CrtL M-M ITCHILL, INC. i17 .36 MECHANICAL PARTS 444R HA CONKITT $632. LAS SUPPLIES t84444 IIAL!TEO A UOGGAN. INC. 1259.93 _ ' 6,i• ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CB445e INLU 1. MANIER t1.275.0U DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION F� ;A F ! . 11,4451 5.R A. CTONHEAL IKGUIIH UL FI ASllfS ,429.56 MECHANICALCOORAC70R PARTS . . _ DK41E2 1. A. MEALY CO. $8$126.56 CAMERA/F II PI-230. �• " PR4433 HOFCA. CAMERA xT OAFS .975.61 CAMERA/F TIN MN44 S9 140USF INC. f2.915.61 BATTERIES POLYMER `j 9M4.5t MOUSE CA NI SICKLES 361.96 BATTERIES f6-45f. PUNT INGTON SUPPLY t221.96 HARDWARE it -� .84-E7 ISCO COMPANY tiR.27J.0U FISCOERROUS SAMPLER _ 1^I :044CN IKPPRIRL WEST CHEMICAL 1R.513.41 FERROUS CHLORIDE -18Aw INOUSIH PAL IM RFA DlU PRODUCTS S21B.53 HARDWARE I � m AR4 All •. INLAAN PAPERTIONA $166.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES .. FM44F1 INILNNR. ONML FUS INf BS MACHINE .175.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES. X L949F2 IMF R. JAMfBUN 11,110.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES/UNOFRGPOUND TANK COMPLIANCE , C1 =_ 4M91f3 TNF JANITOR'S R•B SN OPPF 1$76.19 LAB SUPPLIES GM 1464 JA NU S, INC 3T6.14 LAB SUPPLIES ` 1g •I UU ]F g4A5 JONES CITE M.I ULS, INC. 32,521.h CHLORINE C9 •I 1 1 Cf4-fA M1✓1A F•EANINGS L SUPPLY 31.20B.73 . . . MECNA.HICAL PARTS OF4.AT MFf NAN SUPPLY 61,396.79 VP.VE 3 I ]? U04464 WELLY PIPE CO. $2.731.91 PIPE SUPPLIES } QJE pH4469 NLN`S OIL, INC. $IJ2.30 HASTE OIL C114479 NIENIT PACIFIC CO. $137,748.13 CONTRACTOR J-6-2,J-11B-2 38.471 KING WARIN6. INC. 12,129.35 BEARINGS/MECHANICAL PARTS c ON1472 DONALD C. KINMEY $820.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION_ - 484473 L.M.L•.x., 1"C, 121.00 MELDING SUPPLIES I Haq 14 L. L RO fON$UL IIH6 WGR. t4,023.00 ENGINEERING PI-23R, PI-24R 6 P2.31R J C64475 L11e1ING OISTNIDUIOFS, INC. 135.69 LIGHTING _ n84476 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CON" $250.00 LAFCO PROCESSING FEE/ANNEXATION 068 0157.(2_ _ "•I CF4477 LOCAL AGENCY FOPPA7IUN CONN. 3403.G0 LAFCO PROCESSING FEE/DETACHMENT III GIST. /14 (j •114A 71 , 1US1 RE-CAL $396.86 PRINTING 1 OH4471. A.J. IYNCH CO. $519.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES f NSg6J N.C. 'HBO SIR I IS 1139.92 TESTING EQUIPMENT/SPECIALTY GASES , l NM49P1 M., PLTN TO 3 ASSOC., INC. 1130.30 ENGINEERING/MICHELSON PUMP STATION _ - CP.44P2 Mf5 $116.60 PHOTO SERVICES ^i 01,44R3 MAIN FRAME. SLRVICF.S 37,9I9.6U CIRCUIT BOARDS (j �• PP4.M4 MALCOM PIRNIE. INC. 144:269.67 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTING _ I LF.4N5 •41,61TF CONS1AVCT10N, INC. $624247.76 CONTRACTOR PI-21, PW-061R-1 A PI-22 - - I iP44NF PA4VAC FLI'E.TP.ONICS 1111.62 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES J I P41P1 MALT - LMLNG, INC. $637.19 CHLORINATION EQUIPMENT PARTS _. ' PK.4PG MCKI%TC9-C4RP SUPPLY CC. 1417.R6 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES I.' 4teg69 ME51 COVEOLIDAIEU MATFP t6.CO WATER USAGE oh A" MILL t6S Pf 11,TCFv 346.77 PRINTING � W FUND PO "I--' JT DIST W')PKING CAPITtI FROCESSING DATE 1/2Y/B] PAGE 4 w REPORT NUMBER AP43 ._ ' C I.UN7Y $A NI CATION PAIDh 15 OF OftAN GE COUNTY I CLAIMS PAID u2/il4/87 S •- ri VARIANT NO, VENCGR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION _ - 6f4A91 VIAL SAFFIV APILIAhCES CO. 11.913.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1.64492 MGR4AR t001PMt PIT ED. 1457.83 TRUCK REPAIR -� Gp4*93 MORLEY-71CP.ARTH L ALFfh 5115.647.40 CONTRACTOR P2-3IR EP4491 •OIOkOLt. IPIC. 1192.62 PAGER$/PAGER PARTS 04469 NCR CORP. 1I.T51.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES ` GP44•16 N4TIONIL LUPBEP T452.12 HARONARE _ I C4A497 NEUTRON t225.0C CATIONIC POLYMER _ 1'R..9h NORTH Cf MINAL fkGP. $57.62 HSTRUMENTATION PARTS L Ch4499 OCClOF14TAL CHEMICAL COPP. $2,126.05 CAUSTIC SODA �. `. U845Cu ORANGE COAST ELLCTRIC SUPPLY $5.275.13 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES . . ...__ PNA!•41 ORANEE VLLVF l FITTTNU CO. $773.87 PIPE SUPPLIES CN4!,r12 OPITLV COPP $339.61 MECHANICAL PARTS U645w3 COUNIV SANITA71ON DISTRICT 11.382.12 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND .... . .. _ •A49tl PACIFIC SAFETY E'9UIPMENT CO. $II1.15 SAFETY SUPPLIES/INSTRUMENTATION PARTS O04565 PACIFIC BELL $829.21 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES C• 0845UE PAPT6 UNLIMITED 11.271.45 TRUCK PARTS ! TTT :P4C17 NOV P1NOEP,fkAF7 $H 5.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION X Fh 4!,'!6 PHOTO a SOUND CO. $3n7.64 COMPUTER SOFTWARE E E� ti )P o'O9 FOP(lkA VALLEY EQUIPMENT $17.0O2.OG CONTRACTOR 5-28 by VP4lgi POVFN SPECIALISTS. INC. 9411O.12 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES } r-i OP.51) PQEFERPED PIRSONNCL AGENCY $771.45 TEMPORARY SERVICES '� 1 114111 DUISI IMTI, 11014111 SERVICE 11,611.21 EQUIPMENT REPAIR h4!13 RNG ENGIIIEERIN6. INC. $8.2A9.00 ENGINEERING 1-ISR 1 dR 614 R.A. AILO F,LEC IR I[ $1.432.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES T ✓''�',• r 064!15 flit REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $558.97 PIPE SUPPLIES ._... ...."_.."_ , TA4516 P.EANORD GAS OCTLCIION DIV. 1756.30 ELECTRONIC CONTROLLER 404E17 RICHARDS, WATSON. OPEYF'USS $3,662.05 LEGAL SERVICES OW12 RICUH CORP $1.323.90 COPIER MAINTENANCE ' ok4RI6 HIL01! CORPORATION $659.24 COPIER LEASE L'P45P3 THE. RIOT' PFRFECIION CENTER $29.2.59 TRUCK REPAIR "' C. . GC552] RD.CHWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1131.40 VALVE PARTS i .'A 4922 ROPE CAIA SUPPLY, INC. S437.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR OhA923 JOSPFH T. RYERSON R SON, INC. 51.392.42 STEEL iL 869524 SAE RIFE INC. $838.60 BATTERIES U04f 29 SAN JOAQUIN. CHUPILALS. INC. $M77.09 CATIONIC POLYMER' SAN. INC. $677.00 FREIGHT CHARGE l L84P27 SANCON ENGINLEElhL . INC. $280.01 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 184521! SANTA ANA FLECIRIC MOTORS $187.03 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I,, fP4S24 EAAITA FF SVSIFM$ COMPANY $329.23 ENGINE PARTS I1 (114530 SEA COAST Df SIG"$ 1164.30 OFFICE FURNITURE ,A •IP4531 Sh.IIPOEM SUPPLY $2)9.3E HARDWARE 1�Iil LR4932 SMITH-EMLNY Co. 114U.40 SOIL TESTING V )U4E33 EOLAh IUURIAES IN1EkhlllLhAL 51.173.02 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ER4534 SO. COAST 1.10 DUALITY $5.214.03 APPLICATION EVALUATION FEES uv 4535 SOUTf!LNN CALII. f.PI2014 CO. Ed6.287.33 POWER C64E36 SG. tAL. GAS CO. 419.511.97 NATURAL GAS n X FUNL NO ',I") - JI LIST VGPKIN( [L1.111L FPOCLSSINf DATE. 1/29/07 PAGE 5 A REPORT NUMBER AP13 .. ... ___.._.. CGUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF 0PANGE COUNTY ., CLA 114G AA ID O2/.19/8] i L'AP0.AA'1 ry0. V[XLOfi eM OUNT DESCRIPTION i L14537 EOUTIIFPN COUNTIES OIL CO. $0.137.1G DIESEL FUEL _. ._. I•N•534 S64FMLL7TS GRINAIHG NATFP 196q.11 BOTTLED WATER 484S39 STAR TOOL L SUPPLY CO. SI,S20.37 TOOLS .I 1804A THE SUPFLIERS 32 I135.19 TOOLS/SAFETY SUPPLIES L'K4591 SWEEILAND CO. 1279.55 PIPE SUPPLIES ' j 9FeFr2 TAP IAKAMINF $2,120.06 LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE • :04:43 THOR"ON LACGUIO CO. 3291.P4 PAINT SUPPLIES .. OKgf44 IMO CLLAVAL $239.99 ENGINE PARTS = •"� W94F45 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY, INC. 33.421.It TRUCK PARTS : �> 1Y� 084E46 J.G. TUCKER 6 SON, INC. 1447.77 HYDROGEN SULFIOF CYLINDERS._ 4P4541 TU. TIN DODGE $410.18 TRUCK PARTS 0 A"8 UNITED PARCEL SLRVICE x97.54 DELIVERY SERVICES '•� . PNh1E49 V.O.C. TF S7INf. $1.400.00 DIGESTER GAS TESTING ... .._ .... . GN9 59 VWR SCIFXTIFIC tlr 61J.25 - LAB SUPPLIES ! WN1551 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $4.713.53 PIPE SUPPLIES 'C •' Gd4 i52 VATEC OIV. OF EMERSON 34.897.20 _ . _. MECHANICAL PARTS 1'6g tis N.V. FRODUCTS. INC. $172.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES GN9 5q CARL WARREN S CO. 11r J22.B7 WORKERS COMP ADMINSTRATION ON45S9 WATER. POLLUTION CONTROL 176.32 PUBLICATION gF4556 WEATHEP L WINO INSTRUMENTS $337.80 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ' •Ib 4957 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL Sfl V. 5330.tl0 LAB SERVICE " OP g55h YCST FPN PACIFIC EOUIF Mf NT [C. i34 r871.52 __. .._- ._. _GRAVE S E4S59 VESILdN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $8.413.33 CAUSTIC SQDA 1 fMeHE1 WCSTLRN WIP1. 9 ALLOY 3S11.98 WELDING SUPPLIES OP4E61 UNIT'-, FINE L VFFVILLF SNSO.AO DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY. 1184562 WILLAFO NARKING DEVICES $1,492.18 TAGS 6N4F63 ROURKE L WOODRUFF $19.672.20 LEGAL SERVICES ARh;fq XEROX COPP. $2.640.72 _ ._ _ .COPIER LEASE/OFFICE SUPPLIES G 80F65 xLR41 CORP. 1119.67 COPIER LEASE 5N4P66 MOR4 IS PING 1g9.14 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE C 1567 P.M. CONTROLS ANOIOP 1132.E6 INSTRUMENTATION PARTS •:I i84'OR 21CRARTH AND ALF'EF 3449r4M4.74 CONTRACTOR P2-36, P2-30 3 P2-28-1 - '-d 4569 Zir 7FPPORARY PERSONNEL $1.104.47 TEMPORARY SERVICES ]L AL4570 ERIC C. JOHNSON 176.66 DIRECTORS COMP 3 MILEAGE . :I ----------------- . I lOT 4L CLAIMS P41U ?'e/]9/N7 12r248045.91 _.... _. 1 , I' _ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/29/87 PAGE 6 w REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . ,. I. CLAIMS PRIG 02/04/87 i I.� SUMMARY AMOUNT i �P HI RED FUND $ 8,280.00 02 OPER FUND 6,354.10 ' /2 ACO FUND 3.458.75 -- -- i'� /3 OPER FUND 2,503.37 /3 ACO FUND 37.43 _ ._--_- 15 OPER FUND 4,556.80 /5 ACO FUND 18,197.00 /6 OPER FUND 206.84 /7 OPEN FUND 13,961.47 ,. ®7 F/R FUND 78.209.73 - -- ---- '. #11 OPER FUND 915.11 #11 RED FUND 2,672.30 "! /14 OPER FUND 400.00 /14 ACO FUND 22.00 #566 OPEN FUND' 6,536.91 "Irn'I= Y667 OPEN FUND 3.473.72 JT OPER FUND 319,767.89 — CORF 1,704,179.37 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 4,954.44 ' JT WORKING CAPITAL 69,358.18 $2,248,045.41 - F O'f ' (g C. I ks I FUND TO 9199 - JT VIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2lllt67. PAGE 1 ._... REFONT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY i CLAIMS PAID WIR/97 Ii UONAtRT 40, VENPOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION I'. ?b45P9 A-VIM $552.59 TAPES - .8459C CCU -PF INI " COPY 1387.22 PRINTING P84591 ACF OPAIERY CO. $95.00 CARPET REPAIR EI 084592 ADA"SON INDUSTRIEF. INC. 31.13R.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES (B.S.3 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. 1350.78 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I' ! I84594 ALEA GLASS 4175.6E TRUCK REPAIR R P9595 ALL AMFRICAN ASFHALT S28.35 ASPHALT REPAIR )b4E96 ALLFFCAN PHARMACEUTICAL ♦3.914.99 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT •I 6114597 AMFPICAN COMFRCSSOR PARTS $1,706,60 ELECTRICAL PARTS CP4598 AMFRICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH 360.00 ALARM REPAIR n64b99 AMFRICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 1423.22 LAB SUPPLIES 184f 0) THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 3268.13 PUMP PARTS OB46C1 ANGELIC4 RENTAL SERVICES GROUP $97.60 TOWEL RENTAL C44602 A47ELOPF VALLEY EQUIP. $6.033.49 TRUCK PARTS �a 6846C•3 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 1549.36 4AS51FIEP ADVERTISING _ •m 084604 AC•UA FEN COPF. 13.U1.T2 - ANIONIC POLYMER _ 2 504f05 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD., INC 13.771.48 BUILDING MATERIALS 18410F ASSOCIATED LARCRAlOPIfS 4240.00 LAB SERVICES _ -'� i646t7 FALCON OI Si OSAL SERVICE $25.285.85 SLUDGE DISPOSAL ...-� 084SEP F:RW SAFETY t SUPPLY 2477.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES --I C84F19 PEACON SAY ENTERPRISES. INC. $493,00 _._ __.__ ___ ____ _AUTONIDILF MAINTEN-ANCE._ 2 CF461'o bFCKPAN INSTRUMENTS 112,113.70 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT bj 184f11 P.f FCM STREET LMFLOYFE BF.NFIT $643.67 PREFERRED PROVIDER CHARGE-SF HEALTH PLAN QE 9e4612 DETA COMPUIFP FPODUCTS S290.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES ^I Cb4F13 DOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 342.40 TRUCK PARTS i84f14 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 1.9,902.26 ENGINEERING J-17 Pb.f15 NUFMA PARK LUWR L hARDWAFE 3790.8E __. LUMBER -! 08o616 bU1LGIhG MEWS. INC. 3184.40 PUBLICATION •I 084617 UILLIAM I(. FUTLFR s215.20 PETTY CASH (� lb4f I CPT CAL IF; INC. i271I BA.JO OFFICE E2IPMEHT MAINTENANCE CONTRACT a ('84F19 CS CCMPARY $5,443.24 VALVE - '� C84(.20 CA EPFLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT $40.45 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT l'Y .i C94621 CALIRO4 . INC. A6/2.23 PIPE SUPPLIES ._. _. ........._ UF4522 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION S1.650.00 C.A.S.A. MEMBERSHIP 08.t23 CALLtHAN, MCIIUNE 1 VILLIS $748.00 LEGAL SERVICES ' (J OR4624 MONTTF CARTER CONSTRUCTION 15,692.0? CONTRACTOR 3-114 '84625 CENTRE 9PANGS INC $15.331.62 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT � I CP.4626 CETIICRY LAMINATORS INC. 12.305.69 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT )p4627 CHERWE ST INDUSTRIES, INC. 132.b64.70 FERRIC CHLORIDE �-� 104126 C.FVRON U.<.A.. INC. 30.923.07 GASOLINE/OIL - P8162. CH.VY IAUNDFAMAT 125.73 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT J 0R163p CIIURCH ENSINEf FINE. INC. 3993.28 ENGINEERING 5-19-R3 fb4631 CIRCUIT ONE $119.84 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT R84632 COkSOLIUATF.D ELECTRICAL DIST. 129.51 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES v 633 CONS%IOATEP REPROGRAPHICS $3.434.97 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTION f 99A 634 CONTROL DATA C09R, 1229.F.0 INSTRUMENTATION REPAIR V) 4 1 F UNG NO 919e - JT GIST VOPNINf. CAPITAL PPDCRSS DATE 2V11/87 PAGE 2 ICI RE NUMBER NUM RER APYJ - rl COUNTY SANIIAIION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY rr .I CLAIMS PAID 32/19/87 -1 WARKLNT N0. VFYDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION (% Q8463b CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY 1185.75 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I P' 984636 CONTPOL SFTCIALISTS. INC. IN11.90 VALVE I'I Qt R537 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES INS3.00 ENGINE REPAIR O84636 COSMOTRONICS COMPANY CORP. $1.948.44 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT IT : COST AMESO AUTO SIIPFLY ISCS.IS TRUCK PARTS A9464R CAL WAICM $510e75 EQUIPMENT RENTAL U64641 DAVIS-HNC WN CO. $471.70 REFRIGERATOR t MICROWAVES/PLANT Y2 OPERATIONS O84642 TOM 158.70 MEETING EXPENSE is C7 Iri 084643 CANES DECO $211.5A ELECTRICAL PARTS . .. .... 984T44 DEL RAY CHROME $8.26 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT � 4R464b OIATFC FOLVMERT 39.466.52 CATIONIC POLYMER , (} 78046 OICNSONS $186.43 VALVES �. I PP4E47 DIGITAL E2UIPMENT CORP. 991.00 PRINTING SERVICES A64648 OISPOSAL'LE WASTE SYSTEMS. INC. $6.317.43 MECHANICAL REPAIR (i b84649 Z. PORAVO ENTERPRISES. INC. $976.00 CQNTRMTQR - VALVE 6 PIPE INTAIIATIQN gym 1P4659 OREXELPNOOK ENCR. $194.92 FILTERS I �2O84661 'FASTMAV. INC. 5490.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES G 061652 EMERSON ELECTRIC 5630.89 RFFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT EXPRESS 06,654 FISCHER 4POSTER CORP $4.356.31 PUMP PARTS ERY SERVICES PARTS ; L "r--r 084655 FLOYD CONSTRUCTION CD, LT5.585.92 . CONTRBQTQR PN-IR9 r a 1.846P6 FOA LAPS $2.053.62 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ' btl 1-8407 FOUNTAIN VALLEY LOCH S SAFE 126.01 LOCKSMITH SERVICES O 1 118465N FOUNTAIN VALLEY TRANSMISSION £120.16 TRUCK PARTS . . . _.___. „N 184b59 THE f0AU0RO CO. $923.69 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES 4b4b19 TNT FOS00R0 COMPANY $891.63 ELECTRICAL PARTS 0 I I 0b4662 CITY°.OF AFULLERT MFG. 3934.26 OFFICE FURNITURE .._.. _- GA4663 CITY Of FUL LFRTON 334.26 WATER USAGE GR4663 GENERAL ITT PLASTICS CORP. $4,571.03 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS u OR4665 GENERAL 7ELEFNONE CO. 26.307.05 TELEPHONE NEFNVBR CHARGES O .4F 65 6TFRLILH-HI GIGLIO. INC. 126.$84.84 CONTRACTOR-CONVERSION OF HYDRAULIC TINES I OP.466f RICH A90 A. fiIGL10 384.R9 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE . (% Pb4667 GREAT PCACIFIC VOUIPMEN7 CO. $250.80 TRUCK PARTS ON416H GREEN AC S MO b ILE HOME $732.16 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT C A.4649 W. HAMBLIN $24.16 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE b PN4675 I.f ALTH VALIFY PFG. $59.92 REFUND 059 CHARGE OVERPAYMENT . I 1'84571 HOUSF.GF EATTEPIES $741.24 BATTERIES - P84672 R.S. HUSHES CO.. INC. $630.17 SAFETY SUPPLIES O04673 CITY OF AUNT IMCI ON BEACH $18.14 WATER USAGE ...__ G84674 HV'IT INl.TON SUPPLY 174.95 HARDWARE CP4675 HYOw6TLY F5.859.115 OIL J ""676 IT CAP:HON ILECTRIC S2.3E0.17 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT I 104177 NPFPIAL WEST CHCMICAL S3.952.5R FERROUS CHLORIDE 1114#741 INDUSTRIAL 716HE40ED FROGUC7S $767.73 HARDWARE A Q: it N84679 14LA60 ENTIRE 0UIFPF.NT CO. 142.29 TRUCK REPAIR _ 4A..FC IRVINE RANCH WATER G157MICT ' SIT.IN WATER USAGE _ r. 1 i LJ T M • A FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST UORKINf1 CAPITAI PROCESSING DATE 2/11107 ER6£ 3 REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT' CLAIMS PAID 12/18/87 WARRANT 40. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION j iv I.i 9F4662 10.VI AI RETAIL ENGINEERING INC.T IFS [fi. 4 3956.9N RENNO USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT _ � 5646N2 JOL ROGERC INC. 3q$418.46 CONTRACTOR CHAR t G846H3 JOLLY ROGER INC. $918.46 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT RB4ERS RAS S FEARINGS 3 SUPPLY A917$130.28 MECHAN SAFETY CAL SUPPLIES j•i 114686 KAS SAFETY PRODUCTS 9142.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES 8 ya OP 46H6 KAY-NAY. INC. 1142.70 COMPUTER REPAIR - PLANT 2 4 OP168A VINE INDUSTP1 INC. fl.$46.79 BEARINGS/MECHANICAL PARTS 1 0P46RP KNUK INOUSL SUPPLIES 34R.7B REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT L�I 1846P9 L.D.U.S.. INC.IM[ S35.0 NEEDING SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE Ii PH4A91 LER ERLF.AAN $262.44 FILM PROCESSING i• , 96.691 LIEFC PHOTO. INC. 314).95 Q D8469P LIf H71NO DISTRIBUTORS, SERVICE SUPPLY 228.45 EQUIPMENT REPAIR _ I ' 084C93 LIL•BTING ESETTINUTOPS. INC. .283.70 PRINTING ' m RP4694 ALLY TYPESETTING fI1.2B3.70 PRINTING ti D64695 K.P. INDUSTRIES INC. x . 6 . . ONSULT IHO op-E96 M.G. INDUSTRIES $179.14 SPECIALTY GASES 26e07 MPS $122.11 FILM PROCESSING ' S Cuh 84699 PIU LLNF UNCR. PND $5,529.76 TESTIMONY FOR SCAQMO HEARING E89699 MCRENNA FEUUI F EGUIP. f5$314.45 PREP PETS 1 84 71 P MCN A STEP EOUNP MFNT CORD 3]19.45 TRUCK PARTS a§ 084711 SELL SS GRCIRP SUPPLY CO. 831.87 _ _ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 08.702 MELT ES CRIME OPTICAL $991.86 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 9tl4)@ MORi-:N CNANL CO.. INC. E991.86 TRUCK REPAIR ' I REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT H4749 NELLJ b1$151.89 a 47S5 NEVPWI ELECTRON 3$26.92 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT - - -- •i UBq 7D6 NEWIPO ELECTRII CS. f26.92 INSTRUMENTATION PARTS Q_ G K47 SO CITY OF NEUPORT BEAfX 69.00 . WATER USAGE ' 9M4)GP. O.M.S. t769.00 7M$H DISPOSAL 1647tq OntSSA ENGINEERING ST.851.90 INSTRUMENTS - � (-: 784719 O.00NNELL OIL CO. 1211,83 _ REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT I- ' DR4711 GRANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $792.57 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES " 1194712 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 1963.43 HYDROCHLORIC ACID l) f R84713 OSCARSS LOCK 3 SAFE S64.30 LOCKSMITH SERVICES UP4714 UVFRPEAD DOOR CO OF ORANGE CTY $135.00 BUILDING REPAIRS ' T g8A11b COUNTY OF ORANGE $21.57 MAPS � l9 :b4716 COUNTY OF DFANGE t66.53B.EO SLUDGE DISPOSAL ^.84717 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 112.507.61 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND - � � C84718 TACO PUMPS $1.185.79 PUMP PARTS = JJ 964719 PACIFIC HELL $16,65 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES _ - II Gb4721 PARTS UNLIMITEf 31.533.71 TRUCK PARTS UNq)`el PETAOLI II CORP 117.358.f6 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT J 504 Z1. FE TP CPR 12L $99.70 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 98.723 E'NCiC G SOUND CO. $2.114.91 OFFICE EQUIPMENT I ' P0.724 POLYE.LAU LAPINATES INC. 3I.570.b7 REFUND USE CHANGE OVERPAYMENT TN q 72A POLY-IA IMEF 11.203.I1D CYLINDER MOLD _ 9S47Pf PORTER BOILER SERVICE, INC. S661.66 BOILER REPAIRS F . ; i w • FUND NO 91`4 Jl nIS7 WONNiNf CAPITAL PROCESSING Z(11/tl7 PAGE 4 R .. CFORT ORT NUMBER E ER AP43 ! COUNTY SAhI CLAIMS DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY PAID �• CLAIMS PAD 02/I11/tl7 F n. WLRPAIII NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION i 4 C•84727 POSTMASTfR $500.00 DEPOSIT/BULK MAIL PERMIT NO. 496 0847211 POSTMASTER $2..03.00 POSTAGE I' '84729 POVEK SPECIALISTS. INC. $655.67 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C84730 hANOLD PRIMROSE ICE S30.00 ICE lt4731 RAFFERTY TNTI'ANATIONAL TRUCKS $64.93 TRUCK PARTS i� r71 0847.12 RAINbOW DISPOSAL CO. $489.50 TRASH DISPOSAL _ 084733 R.A. REFU ELECTRIC $3,584.71 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 084734 ROACHWATER TECHNOLOGY. INC. s309.36 WATER SOFTENER - PLANT 2 1 '•d'1 L.� PP4735 POCKVELL INTERNATIONAL 92 t13.371•Cg REFUND USk CHARGE OVERPAYMENT _._. .164736 ROCKLOOD SYSTEMS. INC. $235.50 VALVE •I .1P4737 JUSEPM T. RYERSON L SON. INC. $287.31 STEEL ' (� Cp475N SAP WIFE INC. 549.68 FREI GMT 004739 SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. SI4.70 O.60 MANHOLE REPAIR - DISTRICT 5 CB47gC SANTA ANA ELECTPIC MOTORS $315.77 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES - TD PP97gl '• SHAM MOCK SUPPLY s 4q.90 TOOLS . . i m LM47'1 SIIRPA INDUSTRIES 5776.94 BOILER REPAIR I := C84743 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. 12b.361.58 POWER 1.. GAS On, $14'656." NATURAL GAS ..__.. L84745 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. S12.894.62 DIESEL FUEL .118-746 STAROW STEEL $497.33 STEEL Q'J� 084747 STAR TOOL t SUPPLY CO. $PP5.46 ___ .TOOLS 084748 STERLING OPTICAL $97.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES B It" Gb V9! SUNSET FOND $137.N1 TRUCK PARTS �F Ltl475D INC SUf PLITRS $263.01 TOOLS i•'I 9P47!1 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. $394.83 SURVEY EQUIPMENT P847b2 TECHKT.TICS DIVISION S453.11 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT , O� P84753 7EKMAR COMPANY $263.92 LAB SUPPLIES .. . 184 V54 TMOMFgOF: EOVIPMFNT CO.. INC. S4.500.00 METER PARTS 4k4755 TNAFfiC CONTROL SERVICE. INC. s116.98 TRUCK PARTS O P04756 ENO CTLAVAI. - $15.13 .RUBBER PRODUCTS _ ... .._. NOTTS7 TRAVEL TRAVEL 1332.00 AIR FARE i ! 0847fk N.O. THERIOT CO. S2.863.95 TEMPERATURE REGULATOR ! ' 0847b9 TRACK R AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $5.191.36 TRUCK PARTS ; I 5047bu J.G. TUCKER A SON. INC. S826.90 METER PARTS - i ^ (MITRE TUSTIN DOGGY t71.G5 TRUCK PARTS 1104762 UNOCAL. $61.04 GASOLINE _ ... . ._.___. . L847..3 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1136.64 DELIVERY SERVICES UPA TIP UNITED VE!TLRN ELEVATOR S290.00 EQUIPMENT PARTS JSA 765 UNIVCRb AL RICK $124.49 TRUCK PARTS .. ... PR4766 UVIVf4SITY SALES t SERVICE $43.20 TRUCK PARTS L84767 V.L.C. TESTING f4.954.06 LAB SERVICES " ttil PR47bR VWN SCICNIIFIC $33.67 LAB SUPPLIES .. 984769 YRII.fY CITIES SUPPLY CO. /3,475.96 PIPE SUPPLIES 08477O YALVI SENVIC.TS, INC. 1415.9q VALVE i Ci 084771 JONN P. WATLES s441.20 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT . .. 48A772 VATCN FOLLOTION COIITRUL $331.110 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING r J j. r5 FUND NO 9144 - JT D1ST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING NUM GATE 2/11/87 PAGE 5 1 REPORT NUMBER 4F03 ' COUNTY SA6I CLAIMS DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY : fv CLAIMS FA ID 32 Atl/tl1 WARRANT N0. VC M110R AMOUNT DESCRIPTION C6477S N.S. VATSON COMFA6T 11.482.15 PUIP PARTS I 7A4174 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTEP 14.464.N MECHANICAL PARTS • �+ ILp f.8e775 METRENAMK. N,4, A/R DEPT. 5726.19 LAB SUPPLIES C89776 BEST COAST ANALYTICAL SRV. $750.40 LAD SERVICES CSA777 VE6TEPN eaHFSIVES $11.431.09 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 16477B VESTF.PU STATE CMIMIf AL SUPPLY 16.511.48 CAUSTIC SODA 01,4779 WESTERN VIDE L ALLOY S4.501.35 PUMP PART/WELDING SUPPLIES F•• C84708 WHITE-CURE CORPORATION $1.220.15 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 111111 C8A7P1 VRATff.R CORFORATIOU 425.950.12 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ^j O847N2 XER04 CORE. S670.76 COPIER LEASE V8471,3 MORRIS TING $176.50 MEETING EXPENSE 1L°' TOTAL CLAIMS PAIO PPIL8/b7 3665.199.33 FIT SUMMARY PIIOIINT + ti h /2 OPEN FUND _ 4,014.38 __ _._. _.- _ . _.. .. -_ - . .__.__.. /2 ACID FUND 1,145.66 - --- E 1 /2 F/K FUND 14.67 QF, /; OPER FUND 18,8".61 - -- ---- !.IN /; ACO FUND 7.067.35 i /5 OPEN FOND 14875.96 ' I /7 OPER FUND 7:740.48 - ii II F/R FUND 193.92 - /11 OPEN FUND 1,379.38 79J8 :.� /11 A[o FOND ,696-50 - - __-- , ' 114 OPER FUND 23.18 I- /596 OPEN FUND 1.482.15 9" 94 /566 ACO FUND 999.94 --' ---�----- 07LB OPER FUND 6.82 Q JT OPEN FUND 280,545.75 CORE 106,486.47 - " '---- SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 13:159.18 JT WORKING CAPITAL 199802.83 �.� $665.199.33 (' v I- EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , March 11, 1987, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , Thursday, March 26, 1987. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m., March 11, 1987. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of minute entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the llth day of March, 1987. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this llth day of March, 1987. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts �, Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. �..✓ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954. 2, I hereby certify that the Supplemental Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on 5,l \` , 1987 was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 55 , 1987 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this PLl- day of 1987. Rita J. ,'Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Boa 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Taleph".: JOINT BOARDS "96`241T �— AGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS MARCH 11, 1987 - 7:30 P.M. The following item(s) are hereby agendized for discussion and action by the Board(s) of Directors at the regular meeting date and time set forth above. This Supplemental Agenda was posted more than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time and complies with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2 DISTRICT 1 (15) (a) Consideration of acceptance of sum of $5,000.00 as settlement and release of claim by District against Phil' s Custom Plating in the amount of $5,237.80 for outstanding invoices owed to the District, as recommended by General Counsel. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on XIAA % .. \\ , 1987 was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on �A$�e�► , 1987. IN WITNESS Wtv.0y CAI " � � � WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this At day of ,— 1987 . Rita Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California