HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-07-09 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
�, °'• P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
° + IW44 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
)714)962-2411
July 3 , 1986 -
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
WEDNESDAY, JULY 9, 1986 - 7: 30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 , 6 , 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange
County, California, will be held at the above hour and date.
Secretary
Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
DISTRICT 5 - Wednesday, July 9th at 6 :30 p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, July 23rd at 5: 30 p.m.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3 ,5,6 & 14 - Wednesday, July 30th at 7:30 p.m.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1IMLA ELLIS AVENUE
AO SO%S127
FWNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA WEE
17141SV4411
Y _
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings
July Jul 09, 1986 Jul 23 , 1986
August Aug 13, 1986 None Scheduled
September Sep 10, 1986 Sep 24, 1986
October Oct 08, 1986 Oct 22, 1986
November Nov 12, 1986 None Scheduled
December Dec 10 , 1986 None Scheduled
January Jan 14 , 1987 Jan 28, 1987
February Feb 11, 1987 Feb 25, 1987
March Mar 11, 1987 Mar 25 , 1987
April Apr 08, 1987 Apr 22, 1987
May May 13, 1987 May 27 , 1987
June Jun 10, 1987 Jun 24, 1987
July Jul 08, 1987 Jul 22, 1987
BOARDS Of DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Dirmcis Pm, cents se: aiv
of Orange County, Califom(a 108" Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Cclif., 92708
T. m -
" 71.
JOINT BOARDS °a°?:;
IIAGENDA
MEETING DATE
JULY 9, 1986 - 7:30 P.M.
ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR
APPROPRIATE ➢EPARTMENI 8r.M. I DI ADDITION,
STAFF
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT // lJ0
PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific
agenda items
(5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts,
if any. (See Supplemental Agenda)
(6) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the
following minutes will be deemed approved as
mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman:
District 1 - June 11, 1986
District 2 - June 11, 1986, regular and
June 18, 1986, adjourned
District 3 - June 11, 1986, regular and
June 18, 1986, adjourned
District 5 - June 11, 1986
District 6 - June 11, 1986
District 7 - June 11, 1986
District 11 - June 11, 1986
District 13 - June 11, 1986 -
District 14 - June 11, 1986
(7) ALL DISTRICTS
Reports of:
(a) Joint Chairman
(b) General Manager
(c) General Counsel
(8) Annual election of Joint Chairman
(Nominee: Director Don R. Griffin)
(9) Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman
7/09/86
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of
claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each
Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded
as the same for each District represented unless a Director
expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See
page(s) "A" and "e"
6 11 86 6 25 86
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 337,580.82 $ 809,393 .98
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 256 ,403 .79 159,929 .59
Joint working Capital Fund - 81,552.21 206 ,658.21
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 8,209.76 10,145 .34
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,000 .75 1,382.35
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 32,841.61 7,712.43
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 1,388.64 41,440.56
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 1,306 .81 7,400.76
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 492.39
DISTRICT NO. 7 - -86 ,626 .91 4,300.72
DISTRICT NO. 11 60.03 14,277.45
DISTRICT NO. 13 -0- -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 -0- -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 18.35 7,232.29
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,693.81 32.89
1 810,683 .49 $1 ,270,398.96
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEMS NOS. 11(a) THROUGH 11(dd)
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not
requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any
particular item is requested to be removed from the consent
calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in
attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items.
All items on the consent calendar- will be enacted by one action
approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for
resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed
from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular
order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent
calendar shall , upon recognition by the chair, state their name,
address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the
consent calendar.
Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the
consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on
the consent calendar not specifically removed from same.
-2-
7/09/86
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of the following resolutions
authorizing and directing execution and filing of
documents necessary for Federal Grants under
33 U.S.C. , 12551 at seq. and State Grants under
Clean Water Bond Laws for the 1986/87 Joint
works Improvements and Additions: See page
"C"
District No. Resolution No.
1 86-63-1
2 86-64-2
3 86-65-3
5 86-66-5
6 86-67-6
7 86-68-7
11 86-69-11
13 86-70-13
14 86-71-14
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-72, approving
plans and specifications for Replacement of
Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-23R, and authorizing the General Manager
to establish the date for receipt of bids
(Tentative bid date 8/26/86) . See page "D"
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-73, approving
plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of
Domes and Installation of Sludge Pump Mixing
Systems for Digesters "E" and "B" at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-30, and authorizing the General
Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids
(Tentative bid date 8/26/86) . See page "E"
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 2 to the plans and specifications for
Installation of Replacement of Centrifuges with
Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-21, authorizing an addition of $28,417.63
to the contract with Margate Construction Company
for rerouting of drainlines, installation of a
temporary digester drainline, and installation of
an additional sludgelinet and granting a time
extension of 30 calendar days for said additional
work. See page "F"
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 2 to the plans and specifications for
Rehabilitation of Basins 3, 4 and 5 at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-24R, authorizing an addition of
$87,861.00 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. , to furnish and install two
new scum troughs, coat all ferrous metals with
polyurethane, remove and replace mercury vapor
�...✓ lighting fixtures with more efficient holophane
high pressure sodium lighting fixtures, and
installation of three District-furnished launder
valves. See page "G"
-3-
7/09/86
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 4 to the plans and specifications for
Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28-1, authorizing an
addition of $3,405.00 to the contract with
Ziebarth a Alper for demolition and repiping of
vent Lines and replacement of high pressure
air line. See page "B"
(g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 2 to the plans and specifications for
Rehabilitation of Basins "D" and "E" at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-29, authorizing an addition of
$79,779.35 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. , to coat all ferrous metals on
both basins with polyurethane, and remove and
replace all mercury vapor lighting fixtures with
more efficient holophane high pressure sodium
lighting fixtures. See page "I"
(h) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee
with Pulaski and Arita, Architects for
preparation of Master Plan of Support
Facilities, Site and Security Improvements
at Treatment Plant No. 2. See page J.
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-74,
approving Professional Services Agreement
with Pulaski and Arita, Architects for
preparation of Master Plan of Support
Facilities, Site and Security Improvements
at Treatment Plant No. 2, on an hourly-rate
basis including overhead and profit plus
direct expenses for a total amount not to
exceed $30,500.00 . See page "x"
( i) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee
with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
design of Entrances, Site, Security and
Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-27. See page "L"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-76,
approving the Engineering Services Agreement
with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
design of Entrances, 'Site, Security and
Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-27, on an hourly-rate basis
including overhead, plus direct expenses and
fixed profit, for a total amount not to
exceed $60,159 .00. See page M.
-4-
7/09/86
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
( j) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
L approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee
with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers
for design of Central Power Generation
Systems, Job No. J-19. See page N.
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-77,
approving the Engineering Services Agreement
with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers
for design of Central Power Generation
Systems, Job No. J-19, on an hourly-rate
basis, plus overhead, direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a
total amount not to exceed $252,958.00.
See page "0"
(k) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee re
Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Services
Agreement with John Carollo Engineers re
design of Electrical Reliability Facilities
at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-22, and
Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant
No. 2, Job No. J-6-2, for design of an
extension of the "backbone" electrical
distribution system to serve the proposed
administration building addition and other
support facilities at Plant No. 1.
See page P.
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-78,
approving Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering
Services Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers re design of Electrical
Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-22, and Electrical Reliability
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2,
for design of an extension of the
"backbone" electrical distribution system to
serve the proposed administration building
addition and other support facilities at
Plant No. 1, on an hourly-rate basis
including labor and overhead, plus profit,
for a total amount not to exceed $26 ,010.00,
increasing the total maximum compensation
from $502,330.00 to an amount not to exceed
$528,340.00. See page
-5-
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) 7/09/86
(1) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee re
Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Services
Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for
design of Ocean Outfall Booster Station -C-
at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, for additional
services relative to soils surveying and
mapping; and for engineering services
required for shop drawing review and factory
testing of the major equipment to be
prepurchased. See page "R"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-79,
approving Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering
Services Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers re design of Ocean Outfall Booster
Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15,
for additional services relative to soils
surveying and mapping; and for engineering
services required for shop drawing review
and factory testing of the major equipment
to be prepurchased, on an hourly-rate basis
including overhead, plus travel and
subsistence and profit, for a total amount
not to exceed $102,156 .00, increasing the
total maximum compensation from
$1,971,094.00 to an amount not to exceed
$2,073,250.00. See page S.
(3) Consideration of motion authorizing the
Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum
No. 3 to the Engineering Services Agreement
with John Carollo Engineers for design of
Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant
No. 2, Job No. J-15, for additional services
required to coordinate the design of a 69 kv
electrical substation with the Southern
California Edison Company needed to service
Plant No. 2
(m) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file
Staff Report dated July 1, 1986 , re
Financing Alternatives for Prepurchase and
Installation of Variable Frequency Drive
Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster
Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A.
See page "T"
(2) Consideration of motion declaring that the
direct purchase option for procurement of
the equipment for Prepurchase and
Installation of Variable Frequency Drive
Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster
Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A,
awarded to General Electric Company at the
June 11, 1986 Board meeting, is the most
economical option, and directing the staff
and General Counsel to advise the supplier
that the Districts will exercise the direct
purchase option.
-6-
7/09/86
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-80, approving
plans and specifications for Vaults for
�✓ Ultrasonic Flow Meter for Ocean Outfall, Job
No. J-15B-2, and authorizing the General Manager
to establish the date for receipt of bids
(Tentative bid date 8/26/86) . See page "U"
(o) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file
letter from Irvine Ranch Water District
dated June 17, 1986 , requesting reduction of
capacity in District No. 7' s Von Barman
Trunk Sewer. See page V.
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file
Staff Report dated June 23, 1986, re
calculation of District No. 14's and IRWD's
pro-rata share of capacity in the Von Barman
Trunk Sewer between Michelson Drive and Main
Street. See page W.
(3) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-92,
approving Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement
Between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13 and County Sanitation
District No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of
Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and
Sewer Facilities, modifying said agreement
to provide for a reduction of District
No. 14' s capacity in District No. 7's Von
Barman Trunk Sewer, Reach 2, from 5 .8 MGD to
3 .5 MGD. See page "X"
(p) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the
Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers for design of Installation of
Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1 ,
Job No. P1-21, and at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-28-1, and Ventilation Improvements at
Plant No. 2 Solids Handling Facilities, Job
No. P2-28-2, to provide for a change in the
scope of work for construction services.
(q) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the
Professional Services Agreement with X. P.
Lindstrom, Inc. , for preparation of the Joint
Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan, to
provide for completion of the necessary
environmental work pursuant to CEQA for the
support facilities now being planned by the
Districts.
-7-
7/09/86
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(r) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to
issue a purchase order to Smith-Emery Company for
an amount not to exceed $50 ,000.00 , for soils and
concrete testing services required in connection �..�
with Districts' construction projects.
(s) Consideration of motion ratifying action of the
General Manager in issuing Change Order A to
Purchase Order No. 23734 issued to Air Products
and Chemicals, Inc. for the Repair of Cryogenic
Turbo Expander from the Plant No. 2 Cryogenic
Pure Oxygen Plant (Specification No. R-022) ,
increasing the total amount from $10,000 .00 to
$22,500 .00, plus tax and freight.
(t) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to
issue Change Order F to Purchase Order No. 8970
issued to White, Fine a Verville for assistance
re legislation for the research project for the
sludge disposal alternative, providing for an
extension of the term of said services from
July 1, 1986 through December 31, 1986 , and
increasing the total maximum compensation from
$145,000.00 to an amount not to exceed
$160,000.00. See page Y.
(u) Consideration of motion to receive and file
Summons and Complaint to Enforce Stop Notice,
Amfac Distribution Corporation dba Amfac Electric
Supply Company vs. W. C. Friend, at al. , Case
No. 193928 , relative to Entry Gates at Plant
No. 2, Job No. PW-125 (Rebid) ; and authorize the
Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend
the interests of the District.
(v) Consideration of motion to receive and file
Summons and Complaint for Damages and Injunctive
Relief, International Union of Operating
Engineers, Local 501, AFL-CIO vs. County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, Case No. 49-26-12; and authorize the
Districts' General Counsel to appear, and to
engage special counsel to appear and defend the
interests of the Districts, as necessary.
DISTRICT 1
(w) Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff
in issuing a purchase order to Anaheim Sewer
Construction in an amount not to exceed
$12,000 .00 for Emergency Replacement of Manhole
on the Santa Ana Trunk Sewer (Specification
No. R-023 ) . See page Z.
-8-
7/09/86
(11) DISTRICT 2
(x) Consideration of motion to receive and file
Summons and Cross-Complaint for Damages, The
,�. People of the State of California and County
Sanitation District No. 2 vs. Aero Tech Plating,
Inc. ; Aero Tech Plating, Inc. vs. County
Sanitation District No. 2 and District's Chief of
Industrial Waste Division, Case No. 48 11 13; and
authorize the Districts' General Counsel to
appear and defend the interests of the District.
(y) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-93-2, ordering
annexation of 38.79 acres of territory to the
District in the vicinity of Nohl Ranch Road and
Santiago Boulevard in the City of Orange (Portion
of Tract 10439) , proposed Annexation No. 53 -
Borrow Pit Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 2. See page "AA"
DISTRICT 3
( z) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the
Engineering Services Agreement with Clifford
Porkert, Civil Engineer for design of
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault)
Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract
No. 3-28R-1, for additional services relative to
preparation of modified traffic control plans for
�d 24 of the intersections, as requested by the
affected cities.
DISTRICT 6
(aa) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-94-6,
directing the County Auditor-Controller to
include sewer service charges on property tax
bill for collection, pursuant to Ordinance
No. 609 of County Sanitation District No. 6 of
Orange County. See page "BB"
DISTRICT 7
(bb) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee re
Addendum No. 4 to the Engineering Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation
for design of the Main Street Pump Station,
Contract No. 7-7, for project inspection
services due to Districts' staff shortages.
See page "CC"
(ITEM 11(bb) CONTINUED ON PAGE 101
-9-
7/09/86
(11) DISTRICT 7 (Continued)
(bb) (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-96-7,
approving Addendum No. 4 to the Engineering
Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation for design of the Main Street
Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7, for project
inspection services due to Districts' staff
shortages, on an hourly-rate basis including
overhead and profit, for a total amount not to
exceed $45,000.00, increasing the total
authorized compensation from $308,423.00 to
$353,423.00. See page "DD"
(cc) Consideration of motion amending the Board's action
on March 12, 1986 , approving Agreement with the
County of Orange providing for adjustment of
approximately 100 manhole covers on District sewers
in conjunction with the County's road resurfacing
program, increasing the total number of manholes to
be adjusted from 100 to 138 and increasing the total
maximum cost of the manhole adjustment, from an
amount not to exceed $22,000.00 to an amount not to
exceed $30,360.00 (cost per manhole not to exceed
$220, plus 10% for inspection and administration
costs)
DISTRICT 11
(dd) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee
with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
preparation of a Project Report on the Ocean
Avenue Trunk Sewer, Lake Street to
Goldenwest Street. See page "EE"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-97-11,
approving Engineering Services Agreement
with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
preparation of a Project Report on the
Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer, Lake Street to
Goldenwest Street, on an hourly-rate basis
including overhead, plus direct. expenses and
profit, for a total amount not to exceed
$9,715. 00 . See page "FF.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of action on items deleted from consent
calendar, if any
-10-
7/09/86
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve
the Selection Committee certification of the final
negotiated fee re Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement
with Science Applications International Corporation
(SAIC) , extending the existing contract between the
Districts and SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract
Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall,
Specification No. 5-032, from July 1, 1986 to June 30,
1987. (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-75, approving
Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement with Science
Applications International Corporation (SAIC) ,
amending the existing contract between the Districts
and SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for
Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification
No. 5-032, to establish the fee for July 1, 1986 to
June 30, 1987, at an amount not to exceed
$1,530 ,486.00 for the second year of said contract.
See page 'GG'
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of
motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's
written report of the meeting on June 25, 1986.
(Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(b) Consideration of action on items recommended by the
Executive Committee:
(1) Consideration of motion ratifying action of
Fiscal Policy Committee in extending primary
level ($975,000 with deductible of $250 ,000 plus
$25,000 from each claim) Excess Liability
insurance coverage for two weeks from July 1,
1986 to July 15, 1986, for a premium not to
exceed $12,000 pending further evaluation of
liabiity insurance alternatives .
(NOTE: SEE ITEM NO. 18 BELOW FOR FURTHER
CONSIDERATION OF LIABILITIY INSURANCE COVERAGE)
(2) Consideration of motion ratifying action of
Fiscal Policy Committee in placing statutory
Excess Workers' Compensation insurance, with
$150,000 self-insured retention, effective
July 1, 1986 for the annual premium of $30,634.00
(3) (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-81,
adopting a Purchasing System and Policies
and Procedures Governing Purchases of
Supplies, Services and Equipment, and
Repealing Resolution Nos. 81-24 and 82-34.
( ITEM 14(b) (3) CONTINUED ON PAGE 123
-11-
7/09/86
(14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(b) (3) (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-82,
electing to become subject to Uniform
Construction Cost Accounting Procedures set
forth in Public Contracts Code of
California, Section 21100 et seq.
(c) Consideration of motion adopting revised
Policy Establishing Procedures for Selection
of Professional Engineering and
Architectural Services dated July 9, 1986
(4) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-83, amending
Classification and Compensation Resolution
No. 79-20, as amended, re Management
salary range adjustments pursuant to Management
Performance Review Program.
(5) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff
Report dated June 19, 1986, on NPDES Industrial
Waste Monitoring Special Study.
(6) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff
Report dated June 20 , 1986, on draft report re
"Stringfellow Facility Rededial
Investigation/Feasibility Study: Development and
Initial Screening of Alternatives" prepared by
the State Department of Health Services.
(7) (a) Consideration of motion approving and
ratifying Employment Agreement with Bartle
Wells Associates, municipal financing
consultants, to assist the participating
Districts in development and implementation
of a long-term debt financing program, for
the amount of $125,000 for professional
services, plus $50 ,000 for direct expenses,
for a total amount not to exceed $175,000,
said costs to be shared by the Districts
electing to participate in the sale of the
securities in proportion to the amount of
their respective debt issue.
(b) Consideration of motion ratifying an
Employment Agreement with Rourke &
Woodruff/Mudge, Rose, Guthrie, Alexander &
Ferdon, as co-bond counsel, to assist the
participating Districts in development and
implementation of a long-term debt financing
program, for the amount of $100,000 for
professional services, plus $30,000 for
direct expenses, for a total amount not to
exceed $130,000, said costs to be shared by
the Districts electing to participate in the
sale of the securities in proportion to the
amount of their respective debt issue.
[ITEM 14(b) (7) CONTINUED ON PAGE 131
-12-
7/09/86
(14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(b) (7) (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the
staff to issue purchase orders to Moody's
`..� Investor Services and Standard and Poor's,
municipal bond rating agencies, in an amount
not to exceed $30,000 each, for evaluation
and establishment of a bond rating for the
participating Districts' long-term debt
financing issues, said costs to be shared by
the Districts electing to participate in the
sale of the securities in proportion to the
amount of their respective debt issue.
(d) Consideration of motion authorizing the
staff to issue a purchase order in an amount
not to exceed $10,000 to a trustee for
fiduciary and bond holder registration
services in connection with issuance of
certificates of participation by the various
Districts, said costs to be shared by the
Districts electing to participate in the
sale of the securities in proportion to the
amount of their respective debt issue.
(NOTE: SEE ITEM NO. 15 BELOW FOR FURTHER
CONSIDERATION OF LONG-TERM DEBT FINANCING
FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS)
(15) DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 6 14
Cone deration of long-term debt Financing program to fund
sewerage facilities expansion (See report enclosed with
Directors' agenda material)
(a) Verbal report and presentation by financial
consultants and bond counsel re long-term debt
financing.
(b) Discussion
(c) Caucus by District, if desired
(d) Consideration of the following by individual District:
(1) Determination by each District to proceed or not
to proceed with issuance of Certificates of
Participation in an amount recommended by the
financial consultant.
(2) Determination by each District of issuance of
Certificates of Participation on a competitive
sale/fixed-interest rate basis, as recommended by
the Executive Committee
( ITEM 15(d) CONTINUED ON PAGE 141
-13-
7/09/86
(15) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 B 14 (Continued)
(d) (3) Consideration of the following resolutions
approving the form of and authorizing the
execution and delivery of an Acquisition and
Construction Agreement for Joint Facilities, an
Assignment Agreement, a Trust Agreement and a
Notice Inviting Bids; approving and authorizing
the execution and delivery of an Official
Statement; approving the sale of Certificates of
Participation by a trustee in payments made by
the Districts pursuant to said Acquisition and
Construction Agreement for Joint Facilities; and
authorizing certain other matters relating
thereto (including delegation of authority to
modify and execute documents, as necessary; and
to award sale within certain parameters to be
established by the Boards) , as recommended by the
bond counsel: See page "HH"
DISTRICT 1 86-84-1
DISTRICT 2 86-84-2
DISTRICT 3 86-84-3
DISTRICT 5 86-84-5
DISTRICT 6 86-84-6
DISTRICT 14 86-84-14
(4) Consideration of motion declaring intent to
adjourn to July 30, 1986 at 7:30 p.m. in the
Districts' administrative office to approve
documents in final form, as set forth in
Resolution No. 86-84, and to award sale of lam/
Certificates of Participation.
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Staff report re proposed fiscal year 1986-87 budgets
(b) DISTRICT 1
Roll call vote approving 1986-87 fiscal year budget
( including/excluding long-term debt financing)
(c) DISTRICT 2
Roll call vote approving 1986-87 fiscal year budget
( including/excluding long-term debt financing)
(d) DISTRICT 3
Roll call vote approving 1986-87 fiscal year budget
( including/excluding long-term debt financing)
(a) DISTRICT 5
Roll call vote approving 1986-87 fiscal year budget
(including/excluding long-term debt financing)
(ITEM 16 CONTINUED ON PAGE• 15)
-14- �arf
7/09/86
(16) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued)
(f) DISTRICT 6
Roll call vote approving 1986-87 fiscal year budget
(including/excluding long-term debt financing)
..
(q) DISTRICT 7
Roll call vote approving 1986-87 fiscal year budget
(without long-term debt financing)
(h) DISTRICT 11
Roll call vote approving 1986-87 fiscal year budget
(without long-term debt financing)
(11 DISTRICT 13
Roll call vote approving 1986-87 fiscal year budget
(without long-term debt financing)
(j) DISTRICT 14
Roll call vote approving 1986-87 fiscal year budget
(including/excluding long-term debt financing)
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following resolutions establishing the
annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal year 1986-87
for each District in accordance with the provisions of
Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code.
See page "II"
DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION
�..� 1 86-85-1 $1,822,590
2 86-86-2 7,578,850
3 86-87-3 9,544,745
5 86-88-5 1,962,605
6 86-89-6 1,142,439
7 86-90-7 2,280,127
11 86-91-11 2,006,087
13 --- Not Applicable
14 --- Not Applicable
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report and Recommendation of Fiscal Policy Committee re
liability insurance coverage for 1986-87 (Preliminary
Report enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(b) Consideration of action on Committee' s recommendations
re liability insurance coverage for 1986-87.
(19) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(20) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
-15-
7/09/86
(21) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn to July 30, 1986, at
7:30 p.m.
(22) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(23) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn to July 30, 1986 , at
7:30 p.m.
(24) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if, any
(25) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn to July 30, 1986, at
7:30 p.m.
(26) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(27) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn to July 30, 1986, at
7:30 p.m.
(28) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(29) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn to July 30, 1986 , at
7:30 p.m.
(30) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(31) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(32) DISTRICT 13
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(33) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(34) DISTRICT 14
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(35 ) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn to July 30, 1986, at
7:30 p.m.
-16-
7/09/86
(36) DISTRICT 7
Second reading and adoption of proposed Ordinance No. 720,
An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California,
�...� Amending Ordinance No. 718 Establishing Separate Zones
within the District and Establishing a Schedule of Fees
for Issuance of Sewer Connection Permits and Repealing
Ordinance No. 719 . See page "JJ"
(a) Report of General Counsel re proposed Ordinance.
(b) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 720, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 718 Establishing
Separate Zones within the District and Establishing a
Schedule of Fees for Issuance of Sewer Connection
Permits, and repealing Ordinance No. 719 by title
only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must
be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present)
(c) Discussion and comments, if any
(d) Consideration of motion to adopt Ordinance No. 720, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 718 Establishing
Separate Zones within the District and Establishing a
Schedule of Fees for Issuance of Sewer Connection
`..d Permits and Repealing Ordinance No. 719.
(37) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(38) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-17-
0
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Post Office B. 8127
County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephom:
Am Cade 714
540.290
JOINT BOARDS 962-24111
Meeting Date
July 9, 1986 - 7:30 p.m.
The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine
items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise
self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material
summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting.
To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material
and reduce the number of comments in the Manager's Report, we have expanded the
description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard
to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the
contract budget or engineer's estimate. Detailed change orders are included in
the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being
recommended for award.
ALL DISTRICTS
�./ No. 11(a) : Authorizi02 8p2lication for Federal Grants for 1986/87 Joint
Works Improvements an -Ada anU—Ada ltlons.
The Action appearing in the Agenda adopts Resolutions for each of the
Districts authorizing execution and filing of all documents necessary for State
and Federal Grant applications for 1986/87.
No. 11(b): A roy of Plans and S ecifications for Replacement of Primary
Basins 1 and 2 at al ant No. o No. P -
Last year the Directors engaged Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for design
of Job No. P1-23R, Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1. The
rehabilitation work is necessary prior to covering the basins in accordance with
the Boards' policy implementing odor mitigation measures that was established in
December, 1984.
The plans and specifications for the project, are now complete.
Previously, the staff had advised the Directors that this project would not be
awarded until early 1987. However, we have been advised by SCAQMD that there
will be a delay before they consider the AQMD permit for the primary basin
covers and odor control equipment while they catch up on other backlogged work.
We are, therefore, accelerating this project so that no time will be lost by the
Districts in implementing the overall project once AQMD approval is obtained.
Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications and authorization
�../ for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Job No. P1-23R. A
tentative bid date of August 26, 1986 is scheduled. The Engineer's estimate for
this work is $3.5 million.
-1-
July 9, 1986i
No. 11(c): A proval of Plans and Specifications for Rehabilitation of Danes
and Installation u e um Mixing stem or Di esters "E" and ' H at
Plant No. Z, JobNo. VZ-JU.
Previously, the Directors authorized Kennedy/Jenks Engineers to prepare
plans and specifications for the Rehabilitation of Domes and Sludge Pump Mixing _
Systems for Digester "E" and "H". This work includes the installation of high
velocity sludge pump mixing systems which have proven successful in minimizing
scum buildup and inorganic bottom deposits in the digester, and the sealing of
annular spaces to eliminate gas escaping from the steel domed digesters.
The design has been completed and the staff recommends that the plans and
specifications for construction of Rehabilitation of Domes and Installation of
Sludge Pump Mixing Systems for Digesters "E" and "H" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-30,
be approved and that the General Manager be authorized to establish a bid date
(tentatively August 26, 1986). The Engineer's estimate for this work is
$1.6 million.
No. 11(d): A royal of Chan a Order No. 2 for Installation of Replacement of
Centrifuges With Belt Filter Presses at ant No. o Na
P -2 .
Change Order No. 2 adds $28,417.63 to the contract for the replacement of
five worn-out centrifuges with four new belt filter presses which are more
efficient in dewatering the solids from the activated sludge treatment
facilities. This change order includes installation of a temporary 8-inch
digester drainline needed by maintenance for scheduled digester cleaning,
rerouting of two drainlines that were located in an area subsequently scheduled
for demolition, and installation of an additional sludge line in the main t/
tunnel .
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding $28,417.63 to the
contract with Margate Construction Company. There is a 30 calendar day time
extension granted for this change order.
No. 11(e): Ap royal of Chan a Order No. 2 to Rehabilitation of Basins 3, 4
and 5 at Plant No. , Job No. P - 4K.
Change Order No. 2 adds $87,861.00 to the contract for rehabilitation of
three sedimentation basins at Plant No. 1. This is one of several primary
sedimentation basin rehabilitation projects required prior to installation of
covers for odor control pursuant to the Boards' policy.
Included in this change order is the furnishing and installation of two new
scum troughs which required replacement as they were deteriorated beyond repair
(the poor condition was not evident until the basin was removed from service),
removal and replacement of mercury vapor lighting fixtures with more efficient
holophane high pressure sodium lighting fixtures to conform with the new energy
management program; and installation of three District furnished launder valves
originally scheduled to be installed as part of another project but subsequently
deleted and included in this job.
Also included is the coating of all ferrous metals with polyurethane
coating in lieu of the specified coal tar epoxy to take advantage of the longer
expected service life of polyurethane. The plans and specifications for this
project called for polyurethane coating above the waterline only and for coal
-2-
July 9, 1986
tar epoxy below. This change order provides for the two-stage primer plus
polyurethane coating system below the waterline in lieu of the one-stage coal
tar epoxy. This change was made because recent rehabilitation work on other
basins disclosed significant deterioration of coal tar epoxy coated metals.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding $87,861.00 to the _
contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. There is no time extension associated
with this change order.
No. 11(f): Approval of Chan a Order No. 4 to Installation of Replacement
Belt Filter Presses at ant No. o No.
Change Order No. 4 adds $3,405.00 to the contract for the replacement of
four obsolete sludge dewatering centrifuges with five newer, more efficient belt
filter presses at Plant No. 2. The work authorized under this change order
includes the demolition of an existing 3-inch PVC vent line and the repiping of
two vent lines to the existing belt filter press drain trough, and the
replacement of approximately 65 feet of 2-inch high pressure air line.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 adding $3,405.00 to the
contract with Ziebarth & Alper. There is no time extension associated with
this change order.
No. 11(g) : Approval of Change Order No. 2 to Rehabilitation of Primary
Sedimentation Basins "D" and Q .
at Plant No. ,, Job 9
Change Order No. 2 adds $79,779.35 to the contract for the rehabilitation
�..i of two primary basins at Plant No. 2. Included in this change order is the
removal and replacement of all mercury vapor lighting fixtures with more
efficient holophane high pressure sodium lighting fixtures and other lighting
modifications necessary to bring the system into conformance with the energy
management program for other lighting systems within the plant. The
specifications for this contract provided for polyurethane coating of only the
bridge, with all remaining mechanisms to be coated with coal tar epoxy both
above and below the waterline. This change order provides for full polyurethane
coating of all ferrous metals with the two-stage method described under Item No. 11(e)
above, in lieu of the coal tar epoxy, for the same reasons.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding $79,779.35 to the
contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. There is a 7 calendar day time
extension associated with this change order.
No. 11(h): Approve Selection Committee Certification and Award Design
Contract for Master Plan of Support Facilities, Site and Securi!y Improvements
at ant t Ha, 2.
In May, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit
proposals and negotiate an agreement for a Master Plan of Support Facilities,
Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2. The work entails the preparation
of a master plan to address security systems, parking, landscaping, traffic
control and shop, warehousing and office support facilities at the treatment
plant in Huntington Beach.
The Selection Committee solicited proposals from eight firms, four of whom
responded to the Request for Proposals. The Committee has negotiated a fee with
-3-
July 9, 1986,
Pulaski and Arita, Architects of Newport Beach, based on hourly rates plus direct
expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit for a total amount not to exceed
$30,500.00. v
The actions appearing on the Agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and _
adoption of a resolution approving an agreement with Pulaski and Arita to
provide consulting services for preparation of the Master Plan of Support
Facilities, Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2. Copies of the
Certification and Resolution are attached with these supporting documents.
No. 11(i): A rovin Selection Committee Certification and A"
rovin
A reement for Entrances, ite, Security an nterior Roadmprovements at Plant
No. . o NO. FI-Z .
As authorized by the Boards in May, the Selection Committee has negotiated
an agreement for engineering services to design Entrances, Site, Security and
Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27. The project will
eliminate four existing entrances at Plant No. 1 and create two new ones and
design the interior roads, landscaping and security improvements.
Proposals were requested from four firms, two of whom responded. The
Selection Committee has negotiated a fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation
based on hourly rates including overhead, plus direct expenses and a fixed
profit.
The actions appearing on the Agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and
adoption of a resolution approving an agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation for design of Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, for a maximum amount not to exceed
$60,159.00. Copies of the Certification and Resolution are attached with these
supporting documents.
No. 11(j) : A rovin Selection Committee Certification and Awarding
Engineering Services Agreement or entra Power eneration ystems, o No. J-19.
In April , the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit
proposals and negotiate an agreement for Central Power Generation Systems, Job
No. J-19. The work includes the design of a Central Generation Facility to be
located at each plant and to utilize all of the digester gas production from our
two treatment plants. The scope further requires that all regulations of the
South Coast Air Quality Management District be met.
The key element of the central power generating facilities is the
identification of the specific engine generating equipment prior to application
to SCAQMD for a Permit to Construct and a Permit to Operate. SCAQMD will not
issue permits unless the equipment to be used meets their requirements.
Staff, therefore, recommended that an engineering consultant be selected to
study and identify the alternative generating systems and prepare plans and
specifications to solicit bids for prepurchase of the equipment.
-4-
July 9, 1986
The advantage of this approach is that only equipment which will qualify for
a SCAQMD permit will be bid. Final design and installation engineering will be
�../ performed under a separate contract. The total estimated cost of central power
generating facilities at both plants is $27 million. The estimated cost of the
engine generating equipment is $9 million (included in above total ) .
The Selection Committee solicited proposals from three firms all of which
responded. A fee has been negotiated with Brown and Caldwell Consulting
Engineers based on hourly rates plus overhead at 185%, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit for a total maximum amount not to exceed
$252,958.00.
The actions appearing on the Agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and
adoption of a resolution approving an agreement with Brown and Caldwell
Consulting Engineers to provide the necessary design services for Central Power
Generation Systems, Job No. J-19. Copies of the Certification and Resolution
are attached with the supporting documents.
No. 11(k): Receive and File Selection Committee Certification and
�roy ing Addendum No. to Engineering Services Agreement with ohm Carollo
Engineers Re ecEl—tricallella ity Projects.
In May, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate
Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers
re design of Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-22,
and Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2. The work
covered in Addendum No. 2 is the extension of the "backbone" electrical
distribution system to serve the proposed administration building addition,
currently under design by Pulaski and Arita Architects. The extension of the
electrical distribution system to serve the administration building and other
support facilities will be bid as a separate contract.
The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee for Addendum No. 2 with John
Carollo Engineers based on hourly rates including salary and overhead, plus
fixed profit, for a maximum amount not to exceed $26,010.00. The change will
increase Carollo's total contract from $502,330.00 to an amount not to exceed
$528,340.00.
The actions appearing on the Agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and
adoption of a resolution approving an addendum to the agreement with John
Carollo Engineers to provide the necessary additional engineering services for
design of the extension of the "backbone" electrical distribution system for the
proposed administration building addition and other support facilities at Plant
No. 1. Copies of the Certification and Resolution are attached with their
supporting documents.
No. 110 ) : Receive and File Selection Committee Certification and A rove
Addendum No. 2 an Authorizingthe e ection ommittee to Negotiate en um
No., to— ng_inee�rin � ervices Agreement Re Ocean Out all Booster Station "V-
at Plant No. 2 o�b No.—J-ib
• (1 & 2) Addendum No. 2. In May, the Directors authorized the Selection
Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 with John Carollo Engineers re additional
-5-
July 9, 1986
engineering services relative to the new Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at
Plant No. 2. Addendum No. 2 includes two separate items. The first is
additional subconsultant services relative to soils surveying and mapping. The
Selection Committee has recommended an additional $17,000.00 to cover the cost
to extend the aerial mapping to include the entire plant, and additional soils
analysis to determine the necessary foundation work for raising Surge Tower No. 2
and the connecting pipeline between the pump station and the surge tower. This _
additional $17,000.00 would increase the subconsultant portion of the contract
to $72,000.00.
The second item included in Addendum No. 2 is for construction services
relative to the prepurchase and installation of variable frequency drive systems
and pumps for the booster station. Bids for this work were received on June 3rd
and awarded by the Directors to General Electric Co. on June 11th. The added
services involve review of shop drawings and witnessing the equipment testing at
the factory. The original design agreement did not include construction
services and provided that they would be negotiated subsequent to the design
work. The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee for the construction
services of $85,156.00. This Addendum provides only for those construction
services necessary for the prepurchase of major equipment.
Addendum No. 2 in the amount of $102,156.00 will increase the total
authorized engineering contract from $1,971,094.00 to an amount not to exceed
$2,073,250.00. The actions appearing on the Agenda are to receive and file the
Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above
work and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering
Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Ocean Outfall Booster Station
"C" at Plant No. 2, Jab No. J-15. Copies of the Certification and Resolution
are attached with the supporting documents.
(3) Authorizing the Selection Committee to Negotiate Addendum No. 3.
In predesign discussions with the Southern California Edison Company (SCE)
regarding design of the new Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2,
Job No. J-15, the engineers have determined that there is a need for a new 69KV
electrical substation to serve the facility. SCE has stated that they will be
unable to provide power to the new booster station without a new 69KV substation.
Other master planned projects and rising flows will greatly increase electrical
power demand by 1990 but the booster station will have the biggest impact at
Plant No. 2. The 69KV substation will step the voltage to the 12KV level which
is the operating voltage for the plant distribution system and which is the same
voltage at which the new central power units .will be generating. The Districts
have the option of either building and operating this substation to SCE
specifications or allowing SCE to build, own and maintain the substation. Our
consultant recommends SCE ownership.
The staff believes that John Carollo Engineers should assist in the
coordination of the design with the Southern California Edison Company to
provide the necessary information relative to the booster station and other
District needs.
The staff is therefore recommending that the Selection Committee be
authorized to negotiate Addendum No. 3 with John Carollo Engineers for
engineering services to coordinate with the Southern California Edison Company
for design of the new 69KV substation. Once the agreement has been negotiated,
it will be returned to the Boards for approval .
-6-
July 9, 1986
No. 11(m) : Actions Re Exercise of Direct Purchase Financin 0 tion for
Pre urchase and Insta at on o Varia a re uenc r ve stems an um s or
cean ut a oos er Station at ant No Jo o.
At the June meeting, the Directors awarded a contract for the prepurchase
of pumps, motors and variable frequency drive systems for the new ocean outfall _
booster station "C" at Plant No. 2. At the direction of the Fiscal Policy
Committee the bid documents provided for a financing alternative to be submitted
by the supplier in addition to the normal direct purchase method. The Boards
reserved the right to exercise either option pending an analysis by staff as to
alternatives that would be most beneficial to the Districts.
The staff has completed a detailed study of the financing alternative
offered by General Electric Corporation and has concluded that the Districts'
normal direct purchase method would be most advantageous. Attached to your
agenda material is the Staff Report detailing the recommendation.
It is recommended that the report be received and filed and that the staff
and General Counsel be directed to advise the supplier that the Districts will
exercise the direct purchase option.
No. 11(n) : A royal of Plans and S ecifications for Vaults for Ultrasonic
Flow Meter for Ocean ut a o No. - _2.
In May, the Directors authorized the issuance of a purchase order to
Sparling Instruments Company, Inc., for purchase and installation of an
ultrasonic flow meter for the ocean outfall . This flow meter is a requirement
�./ of EPA in connection with our new NPD€S ocean discharge permit, and must be
installed on the existing 120-inch ocean outfall . The work was originally
scheduled to be included with the connection of the new outfall booster station
to the outfall line, but, on the advice of engineers, was separated into a
separate job. At the time the staff requested authority to issue the purchase
order to Sparling Instruments Company, the Boards were advised that the meter
vaults were to be constructed under a separate contract on each side of the
120-inch outfall pipe downstream of the surge towers.
The action appearing on your agenda is the approval of the plans and
specifications for Vaults for Ultrasonic Flow Meter for Ocean Outfall ,
Job No. J-15B-2, and authorizing the General Manager to set the bid date
(tentative bid date August 26, 1986). The Engineer's estimate is $150,000.00.
No. 11(o): Approving Reduction of District No. 14 Capacity in the Von
Karman Trunk Sewer.
Pursuant to an agreement between District No. 7 and the Irvine Ranch Water
District (IRWD), IRWD funded the cost of increasing the pipe size in Reach 1 of
the District No. 7 Von Karman Trunk Sewer in Main Street and in Reach 2 in Von
Karman Avenue between Main Street and Michelson Drive. Prior to the completion
of that work, IRWD elected to connect to the Von Karman Trunk via the Main
Street Trunk at San Diego Creek rather than via the Von Karman Trunk at
Michelson Drive.
The original design provided 5.8 MGD of capacity in Reach 2 of the Von
Karman Trunk. Funds received to date from IRWD for the incremental upsizing are
equivalent to 3.5 MGD of pro rata capacity and IRWD has requested the capacity
-7-
July 9, 1986'
agreement be modified to reflect only the pro rata capacity of 3.5 MGD
represented by the $867,696.00 paid to date. District No. 7 costs are the same _
as if the larger pipe had not been installed and District No. 7 will enjoy an
additional 2.3 MGD of capacity at no cost under the modified arrangement.
Staff recommends reduction of the District No. 14 (IRWD) capacity in the
Von Karman Trunk Sewer from 5.8 MGD to 3.5 MGD, based on IRWD's pro rata payment
for said capacity right, in lieu of payment of additional pro rata funds for a
full 5.8 MGD capacity.
Attached to the Agenda material supporting documents is the letter of
request from IRWD, a staff report reflecting calculation of the modified
capacity pursuant to said request and a resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to
the Agreement between District No. 7 and District No. 14 relative to
modification of said capacity.
No. 11(p): Authorizing the Selection Committee to Negotiate Addendum No. 4
to the Engineering ervices Agreement for
Installatio ofR lacment Belt Filter
.
an t an
oisenti anon - a an
atP ano o. Notm aaP -2.
Previously, the Directors engaged the firm of John Carollo Engineers to
design and provide construction services for the installation of replacement
belt filter presses at the two treatment plants as well as ventilation
improvements at Plant No. 2. The Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. S Solids
Handling Facilities, Job No. P2-28-2, have been finished and were accepted by
the Board as complete in February of this year. The two contracts for the
installation of the replacement belt filter presses are currently under
construction. Because of the complexity of the systems, more shop drawing
review and more inspection of the scrubbing equipment, prior to shipping by the
manufacturer than was originally contemplated, has now been deemed necessary.
The staff is, therefore, recommending that the Selection Committee be
authorized to meet with the Engineer to negotiate additional construction
services for these two projects. Following the Selection Committee's
negotiations, the Addendum will be presented to the Boards for approval .
No. 11(q) : Authorizing the Selection Committee to Negotiate Addendum No. 2
to the Professional Services reement with K. P. Lin strom Inc. or the oint
Treatment Works Wastewater Master Pian UK to GDMplete Necessary LhUA work for
Support Facilities.
The firm of K. P. Lindstrom, Inc., prepared the Environmental Impact Report
for the Master Plan of Joint Treatment Works that was approved in its final form
in July, 1985. Subsequently, the Directors have approved a Master Plan of
Support Facilities including a new central laboratory, administrative office
addition and other office space and shop facilities, site and security
improvements, a new entrance, interior road improvements and other miscellaneous
facilities.
In order to assure compliance with the requirements of California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the staff is recommending that the Selection
Committee be authorized to meet with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc., to negotiate
Addendum No. 2 to complete the necessary environmental work pursuant to CEQA to N%./
address these support facilities. Following the Selection Committee's
negotiations the Addendum will be presented to the Board for approval .
-8-
July 9, 1986
No. 11(r) : Issuance of Purchase Order to Smith-Emery Company for Soils
and Concrete Testing Services in Connection With Districts' Construction
roaects.
For the past several years, the Districts have had an agreement with the
County of Orange for testing services on soils, road base and concrete materials _
for trunk sewer and treatment plant projects. However, we have been informed by
the County that the Environmental Management Agency Laboratory will not be able
to provide this service in the coming year because of heavy commitments to
County projects. As the Districts have ongoing major construction programs and
an ongoing need for these services, the staff solicited proposals from three
qualified firms for the testing services. The major upcoming project requiring
these services is the Fullerton/Brea Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-25. The
bulk of the testing services will be used during the construction of this
project, however, there will also be other Districts ' trunk sewer and joint
works contracts requiring testing services.
The staff has evaluated the three proposals received. While the hourly
rate for Smith-Emery is slightly higher than for Irvine Soils, the travel charge
tips the balance in their favor as they are in a location adjacent to Fullerton
where the major project involved will be underway and, thus, the total costs
would be lower for Smith-Emery. Outlined below is an example of the costs for
each company:
(Example)
Calc. of Cost
Maximum for Four Hours
Minimum Travel Time Hourly of Site Work
a.i Firm Charge Charge Rate Plus Travel
Irvine Soils 4 Hours 1 Hour $32 + $2* $160.00
Smith-Emery 4 Hours 1/2 Hour $33 + $3* $148.50
H. V. Lawmaster 4 Hours No Maximum $38 $152.00**
*Additional hourly charge for use of nuclear gauge.
**Plus travel time.
Staff is, therefore, reconmending that a -purchase order be issued to Smith-
Emery Company in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00.
No. 11(s): Ratif in Action of the General Mana er in Issuin Change Order
A to Purchase Or er No. 3 7or Kepairs to uxygen ystem tquipment.
In late May 1986, the plug in Cryogenic Turbo Expander on the "A" Cold Box
at Plant No. 2 Secondary Treatment Facilities failed. It was removed and sent
to the manufacturer, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., to examine and repair, if
possible, at a cost not to exceed $10,000.00. After dismantling and inspecting
the equipment, Air Products advised that the unit was repairable but at a cost
of $22,500.00, plus tax and freight. (A new replacement unit is valued at
$60,000.00.)
Since the repairs will take 10 weeks and the unit is needed in the event of
�./ a requirement to start up the "A" Cold Box (we currently have only "B" Cold Box
operable), staff issued a change order to the original purchase order to Air
-9-
July 9, 1986
Products and Chemicals, Inc., increasing the amount to $22,500.00, plus tax and
freight, for the repair of this critical unit of our secondary treatment _
process.
Pursuant to the Purchasing Resolution, staff requests ratification of its
action in issuing Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 23734 increasing the _
amount from $10,000.00 to $22,500.00, plus tax and freight.
No. 11(t): Continuation of Services of White, Fine and Verville to Provide
Assistance re Legms ation or esearc roject arbluage uisposal AlFernatlVeS.
The Boards have approved a research planning study with the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the California Institute of Technology
(Cal Tech) for sludge disposal alternatives, and authorized the engagement of a
Washington, D.C. firm to assist the Districts in obtaining federal legislation
to permit the construction and operation of the research project. The Boards
engaged the firm of White, Fine and Verville to provide the professional assistance
to obtain the necessary legislation. This engagement expired on June 30th.
Although both Houses of Congress have passed separate bills to revise the
Clean Water Act, they have not yet gone to conference to work out the differences
in the bills and produce the final amended act. In order to assure the
continuation of the services of Lee White, our counsel in Washington, D.C.,
toward favorable legislation for the project, it is recommended that the
existing agreement for providing professional assistance and coordination of our
efforts be extended through December 1986, and that the total maximum
compensation be increased from $145,D00.00 to an amount not to exceed
$160,000.00. Hopefully, Congress will reauthorize the Clean Water Act before it
adjourns this session at the end of the year.
No. 11(u): Receive and File Summons and Com laint to Enforce Sto Notice
Re Entr Gates at Plant No. 2 ob No. PW- 25 (Rebid) an AuthorizingGenera
ounse to Appear and De en Districts' Interests.
On June 9, 1986, the Districts were served with a Summons and Complaint in
the matter of Amfac Distribution Corporation v. W. C. Friend and County
Sanitation Districts, Case No. 193928. This is a routine procedure, wherein the
general contractor is alleged to have not paid a subcontractor or supplier, and
they are suing to enforce their rights pursuant to a Stop Notice previously
served on the Districts. The Districts are not in need of active participation
in the litigation, but simply hold the remaining monies due under the contract
as an impartial third party.
It is recommended that the Boards authorize the General Counsel to appear
and defend the interests of the Districts, as necessary.
No. 11(v): Receive and File Summons and Complaint Re Employee Disciplinary
Action and Authorize energy a� o s:T to A ear and a en t�erests of the
istricts.
The Districts have been served with a Summons and Complaint for Damages and
Injunctive Relief, Case No. 49-26-12, dated June 10, 1986, filed by the
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 501, AFL-CIO, on behalf of an
employee that was disciplined by the Districts.
-10-
July 9, 1986
The action appearing on the Agenda is to receive and file the summons,
authorize the General Counsel to appear and to engage special counsel to appear
and defend the interests of the Districts, as necessary.
DISTRICT NO. 1
No. 11(w) : Ratifying Staff Action Re Emergency Replacement of Manhole on
Santa Ana Trunk Sewer.
Recently, it came to the attention of the staff that a manhole on the Santa
Ana Trunk Sewer located near MacArthur Boulevard, west of Harbor Boulevard had
been covered by development in the area and had to be located. When the manhole
was located, it was determined to be in poor condition. It was necessary to
replace it with a new manhole and to reconnect the three local sewers connected
to it under emergency conditions.
Pursuant to the Purchasing Resolution, the action on your agenda is to
ratify staff's action in hiring Anaheim Sewer Construction to locate and replace
the manhole at a cost not to exceed $12,000.00.
DISTRICT NO. 2
No. 11(x): Receive and File Summons and Cross-Com Taint b Aero Tech
Plating, Inc., Re istr cts n orcement ga nst the irm or ego n ustria
bumpin' g to 6istrictew�ystem.
In February, the District filed legal action against Aero Tech Plating,
Inc., for illegally dumping excess concentrations of heavy metals into the
h./ District's sewage system. In May after it was discovered that the firm had
again willfully violated its permit conditions and the District's Industrial
Waste Ordinance, legal counsel sought, and was granted by the court, a
restraining order prohibiting further discharges to the sewer.
Aero Tech has now served the District and its Chief of the Industrial Waste
Division with a Summons and Cross-Complaint, Case No. 48-11-13, for alleged
civil rights violations, emotional distress, defamation and interference with
business.
The action appearing on the Agenda is to receive and file the summons and
authorize the General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the
District, as necessary.
No. 11(y) : Ordering Annexation No. 53 - Borrow Pit Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 2.
This 38.79 acre annexation is within Tract No. 10439 and contains 116 lots
planned for single family residences plus eight additional structures, and is
known as the Vista Royale development. Thirty-eight units have been constructed
(19 of which are currently occupied), 43 units are currently under construction
and 35 lots are vacant. The commercial development is located in the vicinity
of Nohl Ranch Road and Santiago Boulevard. The local sewering agency is the
City of Orange.
-11-
July 9, 1986 . ,
The annexation has been held in abeyance for some time pending settlement of
a lawsuit involving one of the former owners of the territory, the Goeden
Company. All outstanding annexation fees and legal fees have now been paid by
the new property owner, The Fieldstone Company.
The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement
with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the Agenda material
ordering Annexation No. 53.
DISTRICT NO. 3
No. 11(z): Authorizin the Selection Committee to Ne otiate Addendum No. 1
to the Engineering ervices A reement With Clif or orkert, lvl n ineer ar
Desi n o i er-Ho er Trunk Sewer anhole (Vault Rehabilitation at Various
Locations, ontract No. 3- R- .
In July of last year, the Directors engaged the firm of Clifford Forkert,
Civil Engineer, to prepare plans and specifications for the Miller-Holder Trunk
Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1.
This is the next project in the District's program of rehabilitating manhole
vaults on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer that have deteriorated because of
hydrogen sulfide attack. The work includes the replacement or repair of 74
existing manholes, plus 6 manholes owned by the City of Cypress in accordance
with an agreement between the City and the District pursuant to the Manhole
Replacement Policy adopted by the Board.
In conducting a preliminary review of the plans and specifications, the
staff has determined that it would benefit the District and the Cities to
include modified traffic control plans for 24 of the intersections which house
these manhole vaults. These major intersections are located in the cities of
Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Westminster, Cypress, Stanton and Buena Park.
The preparation of such traffic control plans would have been required of the
contractor for submittal to the Cities once the job was awarded and, therefore,
the cost would have been incurred as a part of the construction work in either
event.
• The staff is recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to'
meet with the Engineer to negotiate services under Addendum No. 1 relative to
inclusion of modified traffic control plans for the 24 intersections. Following
the Selection Committee's negotiations, the Addendum will be presented to the
Boards for approval .
DISTRICT NO. 6
No. 11(aa): Directin Count Auditor-Controller to Include District's 1986/87
Sewer Service Charges on roperty Ti
Bill .
The action appearing on the Agenda is the routine yearly resolution
directing the County Auditor-Controller to include the annual sewer service
charges on the property tax bill for 1986/87 pursuant to the user fee ordinance
originally adopted by the Board in 1984.
-12-
July 9, 1986
DISTRICT NO. 7
�./ o.S11 " � l Addendum . o Engineering Services Agreement
Re MaN reet Appppprovaoofontract 7171 Boyle Engineering Corporation is currently under contract to the Districts
to design and provide construction services for the Main Street Pump Station,
Contract No. 7-7. Their initial contract included the design of the facility
and subsequent addenda have added interim site inspection work and factory
witnessing of equipment testing.
At the June meeting, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to
negotiate Addendum No. 4 to this agreement to provide for additional inspection
services. This action is necessary because of reduced staffing in our
Engineering Department due to injuries and a disability retirement.
The Selection Committee has negotiated the fee for this additional
engineering work on an hourly rate basis including labor, overhead and profit
for a total amount not to exceed $45,000.00. This is based on 900 hours of
inspection at the rate of $50 per hour. This change will increase the total
engineering services contract from $308,423.00 to an amount not to exceed
$353,423.00.
The actions appearing on the Agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification for the final negotiated fee and adoption of a
resolution approving the Addendum No. 4 to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation. Copies of the Certification and Resolution are attached with the
supporting documents.
No. 11(cc): Amendi2 Boards' Action Re A reement with the Count of
Orange Re Sewer Manho e A ustments in on unction With ount oa esur ac n
ro ects.
In March, the Directors approved an Agreement with the County of Orange in
an amount not to exceed $22,000.00 for the raising of an estimated 100 manhole
covers on District sewers (normally the responsibility of the District) as a
part of the County' s road resurfacing project. The County plans an extensive
resurfacing program in unincorporated areas over the next two years. A part of
that work requires the raising of utility covers such as District manhole
covers when the streets are repaved.
At the time the staff presented this item to the Directors for approval ,
the County estimated that approximately 100 manholes would be involved in 1986
and the cost would not exceed $220 per manhole. It has now been determined that
the actual number of manholes is 138. Based on a maximum price of $220 per
manhole, as set forth in the agreement, the cost will exceed the $22,000.00
originally authorized and it is necessary to increase the original purchase
order by $8,360.00.
The staff recommends Amending the Boards' previous action re the Agreement
with the County of Orange authorizing an increase from $22,000.00 for 100
manholes to an amount not to exceed $30,360.00 for 138 manholes. An additional
�./ authorization may be requested as future work is identified by the County.
-13-
July 9, 1986' '
DISTRICT NO. 11
No. 11""' Approval of Selection Committee's Certification Re Engineering
Services Agreement e a ro,7ect eport on a cean venue runk ewer.
The Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer is a 70-year old sewer located in an alley
which bisects the first block northerly of Pacific Coast Highway between Lake
Street and Goldenwest Street. Since the installation of the new Coast Trunk
Sewer, which parallels the Ocean Avenue Trunk and replaces it as a conveyance
facility, the Ocean Avenue Trunk is now limited to serving a very small drainage
area. The area it serves is undergoing intense redevelopment with new land use
and utility decisions being made by the City of Huntington Beach. Portions of
the territory are included in City redevelopment projects and other portions are
undergoing parcel combinations which will allow development of the full block
including use of the alley. Therefore, the Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer will have
to be diverted or abandoned.
The staffs of the District and the City of Huntington Beach have discussed
the fact that the Ocean Avenue Trunk is a valuable local collector sewer and
could best be utilized by deeding the sewer to the City for that purpose.
However, prior to transferring ownership it is believed that a project report
should be prepared to determine which reaches of the sewer should be
rehabilitated, which reaches could be abandoned - possibly by the construction
of new interceptors to divert flow to the Coast Trunk Sewer - and the location
of necessary repairs to the sewer and/or the manholes.
The Selection Committee has reviewed proposals to perform this work and has
negotiated a fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for prepartion of the report
on an hourly rate basis, plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit for a
total amount not to exceed $9,715.00.
The actions appearing on the Agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and
adoption of a resolution approving an agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation to provide the necessary engineering services for preparation of a
project report on the Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer, Lake Street to Goldenwest
Street. Copies of the Certification and Resolution are attached with the
supporting agenda documents.
ALL DISTRICTS
No. 13: eement With SAIL for Ocean
eedotNo trictsA 0-inch Ocean ut allMontorn CoA av Ame e
pe icaton No. S-032.
As a condition of the new NPDES ocean discharge permit jointly issued by the
EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Districts must
conduct an extensive monitoring program designed to characterize the effects of
our discharge on the ocean environment. On April 26, 1985 the Districts issued
a Request for Proposals to provide Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for the
Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032. After evaluation of
seven respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science
Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to provide these services for the
five-year life of the permit and negotiated a fee for year one in the amount of
$917,680.00.
-14-
July 9, 1986
At the time of the original contract award it was noted for the Boards '
information that the requirements of this unprecedented monitoring program had
been established by the EPA and it was the first of its kind. Although the EPA
sftol had yet to fully define all of the work to be accomplished, the NPDES Permit
required that the work commence immediately. Because of this, it was
anticipated that as the program proceeded and the requirements were refined, it _
would be necessary to modify the contract to provide for the changes that would
be required by EPA. Accordingly, the contract was increased to $940,468.00 with
the addition of Amendment No. 1. Amendment No. 2 was made upon initiation of
the required ocean current study which amended the total cost for year one to
$1,002,705.00.
Year one of the agreement has been completed and staff has evaluated the
SAIC proposal for continuing the agreement through year two. SAIC has proposed
a $1,530,486.00 effort for year two. The basis for this proposal is the
experience gained by SAIC in conducting the program during the first year. This
proposal is the result of extensive evaluation and discussions between SAIC and
Districts' staff during May and June. As a result of this review, SAIC's
initial proposal for year two has been reduced by more. than $153,000.00.
The total increase from year one is $527,781.00. This includes significant
increases in the scope of work caused by the addition of the ocean current
monitoring program approved by the Joint Boards in May 1986 for $204,628.00, and
mussel assessment which will commence during year two costing $43,243.00.
Considering these two program scope changes as not affecting the increase of the
basic program of year one, the actual basic program increase for year two is
$279,910.00 which is a 22% increase.
`%./ Enclosed with the supporting agenda documents is the report of the Selection
Committee along with a detailed analysis of the SAIC proposal for the second
year of the ocean monitoring program. The items appearing on the Agenda are to
receive and file the Selection Committee Report and to approve Amendment No. 3
to the contract for Ocean Monitoring Services to Science Applications
International Corporation for an amount not to exceed $1,530,486.00 for year
two.
No. 14: Report of the Executive Committee.
The Committee met on June 25th and enclosed for Board members is a written
report of their discussions and recommended actions for consideration by the
Boards.
No. 15: Report of Consultants on Lon -Term Debt FinancingAlternative for
Capital Projects an ons eratl o co ons, aS Appropriate.
The financial consultants and General Counsel are proceeding with planning
for issuance of long-term, tax-exempt debt securities in accordance with
previous direction from the respective Boards and Committees.
Enclosed with the Directors' agenda material is a status report. An
updated report and recommendations for appropriate Board action will be
presented to the Directors by the consultants at the Joint Board meeting on
July 9th.
-15-
July 9, 1986 '
No. 16: Adoption of 1986/87 Individual Districts Budgets.
The Executive Committee reviewed the individual Districts 1986/87 fiscal
year budgets at its meeting on June 25th and recommends adoption of said
budgets.
For those Districts (Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 14) considering issuance of
long-term debt financing, staff has prepared a separate budget document
reflecting the revised budgetary amounts should said Districts proceed with such
an issue. Following the actions of the respective Boards under the preceding
agenda item each Board should adopt the appropriate budget with or without the
debt financing included.
No. 17: Adoption of Gann Initiative (Proposition 4) Annual Appropriations
Limit.
The Gann initiative limits state and local government appropriations of
proceeds from tax sources to an amount based on changes in population and the
cost of living over the 1978/79 base year. Each year the Boards must fix the
limit in accordance with the initiative. In 1986/87 "proceeds of taxes" are
well within the appropriations limits as set forth below.
1986/87 District Net 1986/87
District No. Tax Appropriations Budget Gann Limitations
1 E (69,000.00) $1,822,590.00
2 2,427,000.00 7,578,850.00
3 3,952,000.00 9,544,745.00 I.s
5 1,363,000.00 1,962,605.00
6 275,000.00 1,142,439.00
7 1,544,000.00 2,280,127.00
11 948,000.00 2,006,087.00
13 Not Applicable Not Applicable
14 Not Applicable Not Applicable
The Resolutions appearing on the Agenda are to establish the Gann
appropriation limits for 1986/87.
No. 18: Re ort and Recommendations of Fiscal PolicyCommittee Re Liabilit
Insurance Coverage or 6 8 .
The Fiscal Policy Committee is continuing to evaluate the Districts'
liability insurance coverage options (see separate item under Executive
Committee report and recommendations). Included with the agenda material is a
preliminary report of the alternatives under consideration.
The Committee will meet again prior to the July 9th Joint Board Meeting and
review the options with our insurance broker, the General Counsel and staff, and
submit its final report and recommendations to the Directors at the Board
meeting.
-16-
July 9, 1986
DISTRICT NO. 7
No. 36: Adoption of Ordinance No. 720.
In February, 1984, the Directors established a separate connection fee zone
for the Irvine Business Complex to finance the necessary facilities to serve the
major development and rapidly increasing densities occurring in that area. The
newly created Zone 2 established connection fees of $180 per 1,000 sq. ft.
(compared to $50 per 1,000 sq. ft. in Zone 1 the remainder of District No. 7's
area). Since that time, significant land use changes have occurred adjacent to
the Irvine Business Complex and along the San Diego/Newport Freeway corridors.
The proposed development in those areas will generate considerably more
wastewater than was originally anticipated in the 1982 Master Plan and, in a
separate report last month, the staff recommended that Zone 2 be expanded to
encompass this additional territory. The residential connection fee is the same
in both zones, $250 per dwelling unit, and no change is proposed at this time.
At the June meeting, the Directors received, filed and approved the staff
report outlining the need to expand Zone 2 and conducted the first reading of
proposed Ordinance No. 720 that would implement the recommended change. The
actions appearing on this month's agenda are to hold the second reading of
Ordinance No. 720 and final adoption of the Ordinance to expand the Zone 2
connection fee area.
-17-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
v.O.BCX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUFOPNIA 82728.8127
1OEAA ELL18 AVENUE
July 3, 1986 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFOFNIA821O19-1O1e
nLI 5A0.2810
17141982.2411
MEMORANDUM
TO: All Directors
RE: Proposed Deep Ocean Sludge Disposal Research Project
There have been several recent media accounts of the Districts' proposed Deep
Ocean Sludge Disposal Research Project. Unfortunately, they have not given an
entirely accurate representation of the intent and nature of the project. Most,
in fact, were without the benefit, or courtesy, of the media representatives
discussing the merits and elements of the project with Districts' staff.
Attached, for the Directors' information, is a summary of the proposed project.
Also enclosed are copies of local newspaper ar 'cles which have been brought to
our attention. ,
. W yn lvester
Ge ral nager
JWS:sc
Enc.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
oa wM 0127
..
July 3, 19R6 NnN NV���^«" A927 aa+n
r WAIN VA .GU6 IA -role
masaozA+o
n+a"eezA++
PROPOSED DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL RESEARCH PROJECT
In 1980, a six-year study of the Proposed Sludge Management Program for the
Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area (LA/OMA) was completed. The study
was a ,joint effort by our Districts, the Los Angeles County Sanitation
Districts, the City of Los Angeles, the State Water Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and financed largely
by a federal/state Clean Water Grant. Its purpose was to develop an
environmentally acceptable and economically practical long-range sludge disposal
plan for the Los Angeles/Orange County basin.
The study focused on land-based disposal alternatives. The concept of deep
ocean outfalls as an alternative for sludge disposal was briefly described in
the LA/OMA study. However, EPA would not approve the study of ocean disposal by
pipeline because it is not currently allowed by federal law. The LA/OMA Final
Facilities Plan/Program and Summary of Final EIS/Report did, however, state that
0...Public review and comment resulted in the identification of needed research
on sludge disposal in deep ocean basins. A demonstration study involving
detailed pre-discharge and post-discharge evaluations was suggested..."
In 1981, following public hearings on the LA/OMI( study during which considerable
public concern was expressed over certain land-based options, the Boards of
Directors adopted Resolution No. 81-82, Establishing a Policy Pertaining to
Determining the Best Possible Method of Disposal of Sewage Solids. It commits
the Districts to study all feasible sludge disposal alternatives, including deep
ocean disposal.
Shortly thereafter, the Boards approved participation with the U.S. Department
of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to fund a
research and planning study for deep ocean disposal of sludge off Orange County
and engaged counsel in Washington, DC to assist the Districts in obtaining the
necessary federal legislation to permit the construction and operation of the
research project. The research project has generated considerable interest in
the Congress. In fact, the Conference Report on the 1981 Clean Water Act
Amendments stated "...the Research Project conducted by NOAA on sludge from the
Orange County Sanitation Districts may continue".
The Environmental Quality Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (Cal
Tech), has produced a research plan for the deep ocean disposal of pre-conditioned
sewage sludge. Proposed in a region over eight miles from shore and in more than
1,000 feet of water, the plan is based on considerable site-specific oceanographic
observations conducted by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
(SCCWRP) and ocean current studies by ROAA (see attached Exhibit A, Excerpted
from the Final Draft Report dated September 12, 1985). Funding for developing
the plan was provided by NOAA, the Andrew Mellon Foundation, the William and
Flora Hewlett Foundation, and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
.� (CSDOC).
-1-
Dilute, pre-conditioned digested sludge not to exceed one-half of the Districts'
production would be discharged through a pipeline for a five-year period.
Extensive studies would be conducted by the marine research community to
determine the effect of the discharge of municipal sludges on the ocean.
Environmental monitoring data would be compared to pre-discharge baseline data.
A major safeguard would include continuous oversight of the study by an
independent regulatory and scientific board. In the event the board found
unacceptable adverse environmental effects occurring as a result of the study _
then the practice would be discontinued. This research project would provide
substantial new scientific information presently not available on the deep ocean
because many of the proposed experiments have never been conducted before,
particularly in actual situations. It will provide reliable data to help guide
future decisions in dealing with one of the most complex issues in the entire
water quality area; namely, the assimilative characteristics of the deep ocean.
The particular data to be collected and analyzed by the study is described in the
project description prepared by Cal Tech and the scientists associated with
preliminary studies and is the result of workshops conducted by NOAA and Cal Tech.
A number of the nation's outstanding marine biologists and representatives from
other scientific disciplines participated in the effort to set out the most
useful and constructive studies to be performed. The analysis and evaluation of
the data is to be undertaken by outside experts, not Orange County Sanitation
Districts' personnel.
It is important that this project be considered in the context of multi-medium
management of contaminants, recommended by the National Academy of Science. The
multi-medium approach considers the particular characteristics of each
environmental medium (ocean, land and air) and allows for an overall assessment
of impacts and a means of maximizing environmental protection and minimizing
�..� risks. We also support the Academy's views that recognize energy, resource
limitations and the interrelationships with waste production, treatment and
disposal methods as critical to decision-making. A balanced concept of multi-
media waste management for overall minimization of risks can be adopted based on
projects like the Orange County's deep ocean research proposal which will
provide a wealth of scientific information.
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sea Grant Program (MIT) has recently
published a report on "Ocean Disposal of Municipal Wastewater: Impacts on the
Coastal Environment." This 1,100 page report concludes that there is no
scientific basis for the presumption that the disposal of digested sludge in the
ocean is unacceptable nor does the presumption consider the impacts and costs of
the alternatives for disposal which may produce additional air and land pollution.
The scientific community suggests new approaches to waste management must be
taken to reverse current policy "...which is more costly in terms of energy,
resources and environmental damage over the long-term..."
The MIT Report also makes several points and recommendations which are
supportive of the proposed research project. The report observes that:
"...the present federal water quality program implicitly assumes that
land and air disposal of wastes is generally preferable to water disposal,
yet there is no systematic basis for the assumption..."
-2-
"Sludge disposal methods in the ocean can be improved. Instead of being
banned outright, the ocean sludge disposal option should be kept open for
analysis and evaluation on scientific, technical and economic grounds,
just as for other options."
"Research and demonstration projects should be encouraged to gain more
information on effective techniques for management of ocean disposal. An
example would be the deepwater (300m) disposal of sewage sludge off Orange
County for a trial period of five years to observe transport, fates and
effects of sludge particles, and improve methodology for analysis of such
discharge in general ."
We believe there is also an emerging school of thought within the scientific
community that there may, in fact, be positive benefits from controlled ocean
disposal.
To date, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and CSDOC have
funded planning and basic research at the Environmental Quality Laboratory at
Cat-Tech and ocean surveys by SCCWRP and NOAA personnel and research vessels.
The objective is to develop a research plan that will be acceptable to the EPA
Administrator, to determine if a controlled discharge of a specific quality and
quantity of municipal sludge discharged at depths never before attempted will
benefit man and the marine environment. In other words, can the marine science
community develop a system to enhance the marine environment and increase
productivity using nutrients in a controlled, thoughtful manner, just as
nutrients applied to the land can have a beneficial effect under controlled
conditions.
The proposed legislation does not encourage sludge dumping or set a precedent for
others to follow. The legislation, which was worked out with the National
Wildlife Federation staff, is permissive and merely authorizes the EPA
Administrator to issue a five-year Ocean Research permit:
". ..if the Administrator is satisfied such local agency (CSDOC) is
actively pursuing long-term land-based options for the handling of its
sludge with special emphasis on remote disposal alternatives set forth in
the 1980 LA/OMA sludge management project and on reuse of sludge or use of
recycled sludge and if the Administrator determines there is no likelihood
of an unacceptable adverse effect on the environment as a result of issuance
of such permit..."
Based on the foregoing, the ocean research permit, if and when issued by the EPA
Administrator, will address any concerns on contaminants, such as PCBs, by
restricting their discharge to background measurements. The volume of sludge
allowed during the research project is limited to not more than one-half of the
Districts' production. The legislation only authorizes the Districts to conduct
the experiment for five years. Any further discharge would require further
legislative approval. The preconditioning process for the research discharge
will ensure that the exacting requirements of the Administrator will be met.
The research for the required land-based facilities as well as the ocean
discharge segment will be conducted and the final results will be evaluated by
scientists of noted institutions including Cal-Tech, Scripps Institute of
Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, University of Rhode Island,
Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium,
and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
-3-
We expect the quality of sludge will improve through our combined programs of
source control enforcement and public education to eliminate the discharge of
undesirable materials into the sewer systems by both businesses and households.
For ten years CSDOC has been enforcing a very successful industrial source
control ordinance with ever-increasing standards to be met by the industrial
community. In addition, an education program is presently being developed to
inform all residential users of the CSDOC system on "what not to put down the
drain" to reduce the potential of toxic materials entering the system. Several
"Toxic Roundups" have already been conducted by the Districts in cooperation
with other agencies.
The proposed legislation (see attached Exhibit B) gives the EPA Administrator
many safeguards to ensure the project will be conducted in a safe, scientific,
unbiased manner that will assure that the environment is adequately protected.
It further provides that if the monitoring results indicate unacceptable
impacts on the marine environment, the project will be immediately terminated.
The CSDOC Boards of Directors are on record as having committed to do so.
During the course of the five-year study the Districts will continue to actively
pursue long-term land-based options with special emphasis on remote disposal
alternatives set forth in the 1980 LA/OMA project study and on reuse of sludge.
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County continue to be on the leading
edge in the field of water pollution control. Our industrial source control
program which began in 1976 is looked upon by many in this field as an
outstanding achievement. We have spent millions of dollars of our local money
to meet EPA and state discharge requirements; in fact, we are the first and only
major municipal ocean discharger in California to meet the standards.
Our research budget for 1986 is $3,203,000. The proposed deep ocean research
project is another step by our agency to separate the known and unknown using
advanced marine science technology, again looking for a better solution to the
environmental problems facing coastal communities. The ultimate success or
failure of this deep ocean experiment should be judged by the marine scientific
community who will evaluate the multi-faceted experiments conducted by other
independent scientists during the five year life of the program.
Given the limited alternatives, it would seem there is a pressing need to
evaluate all sludge disposal options to assure that the least environmentally
detrimental methods are employed. There are only three options for the disposal
of any waste; the air, the land, and the water. When you consider that
disposal to the atmosphere by burning may adversely impact air quality and
disposal to land by burial may have undesirable impacts, it does not seem
prudent to eliminate use of the ocean as an alternative before fully evaluating
it. It may be that the ocean, with its tremendous assimilative capacity, is the
most environmentally sound alternative, all factors considered. Further, the
positive benefits that may result from various disposal alternatives should be
examined carefully and methodically. We will never know unless this research
work is conducted. The proposed study will provide the scientific data upon
which federal and state legislators and regulatory officials can base future
decisions, not only on this important matter, but, in fact, the broader issue of
total environmental management.
-4-
EXHIBIT A
Excerpted From
Final Draft
Deep Ocean Disposal of Sewage Sludge
Off Orange County, California
A Research Plan
by
Environmental Quality Laboratory
California Institute of Technology
September 12, 1985
Proposed Deep-Ocean Discharge of Sludge
Within a few tens of miles off the southern California coast the ocean
basins drop to depths of over 3000 feet (1000 meters). An earlier Environmental
Quality Laboratory report (Jackson, et al ., 1979) recommended a depth of about
1300 feet (400 meters), on the side slope of a basin, as the best candidate site
for further sludge disposal study. It was felt that environmental effects
associated with marine sludge disposal would be minimal at that depth. CSDOC
now proposes an experimental discharge of 50% of its sludge through a small
pipeline terminating 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) from the mouth of the Santa Ana
River at a depth of 1000-1300 feet (300-400 m) . The pipe (about 18 inches in
diameter or smaller) would be continuously welded and coated both internally and
externally; it could easily be laid from a pipe-laying barge (see NRC, Marine
Board, 1984, for brief discussion of pipe-laying technologies).
At the time of the first edition of this research plan, Nov. 1982, CSDOC
✓ research paln wasabased0on thattrateuofesolidsed(scharge, '''150ptons/dayn(136e
metric tons/day). This second edition reflects halving of the proposed
discharge rate, although many research tasks remain qualitatively unchanged.
Savings attributable to the original proposal would have been nearly $10
million per year, including the annualized cost of capital as well as annual
operation, maintenance, research and monitoring costs. For half marine, half
land discharge, the savings (compared to 100% land discharge) would be much
smaller (perhaps $1 - 2 million/yr). Nonetheless, the experiment will pay for
itself and generate valuable knowledge and experience to guide future ocean
sludge disposal policy.
The environmental impacts of ocean disposal are expected to be slight,
based on what is currently known. We do not anticipate any human health impact
or risk. If the research plan presented herein reveals unacceptable
impacts, CSDOC will modify or discontinue its ocean discharge operations. Upon
termination of the discharge, any sludge-related changes in biological
communities are expected to be reversed within only a few years.
CSDOC is currently seeking approval to conduct this experiment through
special legislation and/or regulatory actions at both state and federal levels.
-1-
Need for Research
Because the CSDOC sludge outfall would be about four or five times deeper
than existing wastewater or sludge outfalls, there are special research needs
for system engineering and evaluation of environmental effects. The specific
goals of this research plan are:
1. To characterize the physical, chemical, and biological properties of
the sludge.
2. To recommend: (i) depth and location of the end of the sludge
outfall ; (ii) in-plant processing of sludge before discharge; and (iii)
possible modifications in pretreatment (or source control) programs for trace
contaminants.
3. To make pre-discharge predictions of sludge-induced environmental
impacts. These would include changes in water-column oxygen concentrations and
benthic sedimentation rates.
4. To observe changes in water column and benthic communities and measure
the distribution of important chemicals in the water, in the sediment, and in
organisms.
5. To find what human health risks (if any) are associated with deepwater
sludge discharge, either directly through human contact with seawater or
indirectly through consumption of seafood.
6. To determine the mechanisms by which ecological and chemical changes
occur.
7. To assess the predictability of the effects of deep sludge discharge by
comparing model predictions with monitoring data.
8. To summarize and recommend methodology for designing systems for sludge
discharge into the ocean and predicting the effects.
9. To summarize the effects of the Orange County sludge discharge, and
evaluate their significance with respect to marine resources.
Research Plan
To satisfy the goals listed above, a comprehensive research plan is
presented, consisting of 41 tasks arranged in nine groups:
Task Group 1. Survey for Discharge-Relating Effects
(pre- and post-discharge monitoring)
2. Site Characteristics
3. Sludge Characteristics
4. Modeling
5. Preliminary Design
6. Biological Impacts--Laboratory Studies
7. Biological Impacts--In-Situ Studies
8. Special Studies
9. Integration, Analysis, and Interpretation
-2-
Since publication of the original report in November, 1982, the Southern
California Coastal Water Research Project has completed a two-year field and
modeling study, providing an excellent preliminary evaluation (SCCWRP, 1984),
and NOAA has measured ocean currents at a number of stations and depths.
�./ Project Organization
The research plan describes the work to be done without regard to who will
perform which tasks. Although major parts of the proposed work may be done -
under grants and contracts to universities and private firms, significant
portions are being or have been performed by CSOOC (in-house) and by the
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.
An administrative board would be established to set overall policy to be
carried out by a project research administrator selected by the board. The
project research administrator would carry out the research plan by means of
grants and contracts; research proposals would be evaluated with peer reviews.
A research review committee would be established to advise the research
administrator on priorities, changes in the research plan, and evaluation of
proposals. An annual summary and evaluation of the results would be prepared
for the regulatory agencies, CSDOC, NOAA, and other sponsors.
Thus management of the research project would be independent of CSDOC, the
agency which is responsible for building and operating the sludge disposal
system. Regulatory agencies would be responsible for specifying the conditions
under which the sludge discharge may continue.
Project Cost
o.i The research project would include up to two years of predischarge work and
five more years of study after the discharge begins. The estimated total
research cost is approximately $1.7 to 2.2 million per year. These R & D costs
are in addition to the usual capital, operation and maintenance costs for the
sludge outfall system.
National Significance
National policy for sludge disposal is currently being reviewed, especially
with regard to permitting ocean disposal. If the experimental deep-water sludge
discharge goes forward as proposed, research and monitoring activities
recommended in this report will produce results which are potentially very
important to policy-makers. For instance, if related environmental effects are
found to be very small, then the ocean discharge option may be viewed more
favorably vis-a-vis air and land disposal options.
-3-
EXHIBIT B
EXCERPT FROM H. R. 8
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CLEAN WATER ACT
Passed by the House of Representatives onJuly 23, 1985
Section 49. Ocean Discharge Research Projects.
(a) In General--Notwithstanding any other provision of -
law, the Administrator is authorized to issue a research permit
to the Orange County, California, Sanitation Districts for the
discharge of preconditioned municipal sewage sludge into the
ocean for the purpose of enabling research to be conducted in
assessing and analyzing the effects of disposing of sewage
sludge by pipeline into ocean waters, if the Administrator is
satisfied that such local governmental agency is actively
pursuing long-term land-based options for the handling of its
sludge with special emphasis on remote disposal alternatives
set forth in the 1980 LA/OMA sludge management project and on
reuse of sludge or use of recycled sludge and if the
Administrator determines there is no likelihood of an
unacceptable adverse effect on the environment as a result of
issuance of such permit.
(b) Permit Terms--
(1) Period--Such permit for the discharge of sludge shall
be for a period of five years.
(2) Monitoring--Such permit shall provide for monitoring
of permitted discharges and other discharges into the ocean in
the same area and the effects of such discharge (including
cumulative effects) in conformance with requirements
established by the Administrator, after consultation with
appropriate Federal and State agencies, and for the reporting
of such monitoring to Congress and the Administrator every six
months.
(3) Volume of Discharge--Such permit shall provide that
the volume of such local agency's sludge disposed of by such
experimental pipeline shall be no more than one and one-half
times that being disposed of by such remote disposal and
alternatives for the reuse of sludge and the use of recycled
sludge. In no event shall the agency dispose of more than 50
percent of its sludge by the pipeline.
(4) Termination--The permit shall provide for termination
of the permit if the Administrator determines that the disposal
of sewage sludge is resulting in an unacceptable adverse impact
on fish, shellfish, and wildlife.
(c) Report--Such districts shall report the results of
the program and an analysis of such program to Congress under
this section not later than four and one-half years after
issuance of the permit.
Al2 * Orange Coast DAILY PILOT/ Tuesday,July 1, 1986
10PFq0N.
./
` Experimental '
sludge dumping
dangerous idea
Hello,guinea pigs.
The Orange Count Sanitation District wants to use
you in an experiment. It wants to spend$20 million to
see what would happen if it were to dump sewer sludge
12 miles off the Orange Coast in 1,000 feet of unpolluted
Pacific Ocean water for five years.
It seems certain that adding untreated sewer sludge
— including as much as one-half ton of toxic
polychlorivatedl'nphenyls (PCBs) — to the relatively
pure environment would pollute it.The question seems
only to be one of degree: Would the sludge be diffused
into harmlessly low concentrations? Would the
chemicals in the sludge affect food fish and, ultimately,
the fishing industry in the dumping area? Would non-
edible, but nonetheless important, sea life be affected?
Could the junk make its way closer to shore?
Oh,yeah..One other question:Can't the sanitarians
think of anything better to do with$20 million of what
they describe as "reserve funds" than flirt with
pollution?It would seem that a public agency with$20
million it doesn't know what to do with should give the
money back to the ratepayers from whom it was taken.
Another alternative would be to experiment with
technologies that improve waste treatment so it may be
disposed of safely.
To take obviously harmful sludge and dump it at
what appears to be a safe distance is scientifically.naive.
We should have learned from places like Love Canal,
N.Y.,and Times Beach,Mo., that the greatest danger to
be feared in the disposal of toxic wastes is human
ignorance.
Out of sight is not out of mind, at least not .
permanently.
To dump sludge considered too dirty to be disposed
ofcloser to shore,sludge known to contain PCBs,off the
Orange Coast on an experimental basis is to be reckless
and irresponsible.
At this early stage of its planning, the sludge line is
seven years and two major approvals off. But, if the
sanitation district cannotbuild a strongerargument for it
than the"experiment"story that has been made public;
if it cannot offer assurances that the program it proposes
is safe within reasonable standards, the idea should be
flushed.
Orange Coast DAILY PILOT/ Monday, June 30, 1986
Sludge
lime ozz
coast
assailed
By ROBERT BARKER
aliNaW'AM 9Y11
Proposals to build an experimental
sewage sludge line deep under coastal
waters between Huntington Beach
and Newport Beach have come under
fire from Southern California en-
vironmentalists
The sludge line is proposed for the
heart of a prime commercial fishing
area,according to Nancy Tayylor,co-
chairman of WeCleanCoestal Waters
Task Force of the Sierra Club.
In a letter.urging U.S. Senate
members to oppose the S20 million
Project pproposed by. the Orange
County S muon District, Taylor
said scientists are interested in the
Pro act sa they can study the before-
an effects of dumping sewage
sludge into a relative clean area.
"It seems that the Orange County
authorities are willing to pollute a
natural area, known for its com-
mercial fishin& far the sake of
scientific study,"she said.
Taylor also cited Southern Cali-
fomia Coastal.Water Research pro-
ject studies that reportedly show the
Orange County Sanitation District
(Please see SLUDGE/A2)
SLUDGE LINE OFF COAST ASSAILED...
From Al
"has low but significant levels of Taylor claimed that bluenose Local officials say building the 10-
PCBs" in its effluent — about one- dolphins living in Southern Cali- to 12•mile-long pipe would give them
halfum year. fomia waters already have the highest an unprecedented look at the effects
Taylor said that the proposed DDT and PCB levels ofany mammal ofdeepacean dumping ofsludge,the
sludge line would contribute at least in the world, primarily because of end waste product of sewage treat-
the same amount of FCBs each year dumping of them chemicals between ment-
and there is no way for the environ- 1940 a 1972.
ment to assimilate it; To prevent more contamination TheprDkine,which Proposals say
"Once they've built the sludge line, into the environment seems ludi- would be I,000 feet below the ocean
spent the money and have done the emus,"she said. surface,is intended to be a five-year
work,how are yyou going to get them Currenuy, Orange County rani- mimmh ProJecL
to turn it off(ifitirroves harmful to tauon officals are permittedmdumb It stills requires the approval ofthe
the environment), she asked today. ally treated sewage water—and not Environmental Protection Agency
"PCBs are known to muse destmc- sludge — through the outfall line and the National Oceanographic and
ry Lion to liver enzymes,which is linked where the Santa Ana River enters the Atmospheric Administration. Cam-
to liver cancer in animals."she said. Pacific Ocean. pletion is not expected until 1993.
Saturday, June 28, 1986 The Orange County Register
SLUDGE
aea:n
BW Orange CAuray Semanan C S olfidek have popowd a 520 rtifion plan
Huntingt n to send the owxy's Sludge 10 b 12 miss xso the ocean.The 24-'rY3+pip,
Beach Wil carry tha dais 1.000 feat bean the eurfece from part #z mated
^ PacificWON the Seem Pro Pieer at Pacific Coast Highway hway m Huntr Batch
Ocean -
A�. Orange County
Sanitation District
s� cr ea cw�xv sa. mesa Plant #2
Huntington Beach
6 10.12 miles �1000 feet
➢al Ft.—The Rego er
Deep-ocean pipeline
for sludge proposed
By Dana Kennedy depth of more than 1.000 feet.
The Register If built, it would be the longest
and deepest sludge line in the
A S20 million proposal for the world and would be the first at.
first sludge pipeline off the waters tempt at deep-ocean disposal, ac-
of Orange County also will be the cording to Wayne Sylvester,gener-
first attempt in the world to test the at manager of the sanitation dis-
effect of dumping such sewage in trict.
the deep ocean,officials said. The pipeline is intended as a 5-
But the plan is under fire from year research protect to allow sci-
environmentalists who believe it enlists to study the effects of dump,
will pollute the ocean and violate ing sludge in the deep ocean, Syl-
existing clean-water laws. vester said. It is not designed to
At issue is a pipeline first pro- provide a permanent solution to
posed in 19112 by the Orange Counts' the disposal of Orange County's
Sanitation District that would ex- sludge, he said.
tend from the district plant at the The pipeline would not cost tax-
mouth of the Santa Ana River 10 to payers any money. Reserve dis-
12 miles into the ocean off Hunting- trict funds would be used to pay for
ton Beach or Newport Beach at a Please see SLUDGEIA25
SLUDGE: Deep-ocean disposal is proposed
Eg0M At
d,Sylvester said. they're trying to put one in Orange forms, Irvine, where it is mixed
Construction of the pipeline also County," said Nancy.Taylor, ar with trash and buried. If the pipe-
tyould require approval by the fed- chair of the Sierra Club Coastal line were constructed, half of the
' mat Environmental Protection Water Task Force,which recently sludge"old be pumpedout roses.
Agency and the National Oceano- wrote to legislators urging them to and the rest would still go to the
graDhicand Atmospheric Adminis- refuse the waiver sought by Or- landfill,Sylvester said.
tjation.The pipeline is not expect- ange County officials. '.'If they Sylvester said the dumped
£d to be completed for at least sev- want to study a sludge line, they sludge could benefit marine life by
an years. - can come up and study this one," acting as a kind of"ocean fertiliz-
Orange County's plan is an alter- she said at... -
petive to the burning or burial of The Hyperion sludge line off EI "If we Nought that this would
sludge—the solid residue of treat- Segundo was built in 1961, accord- pollute,we'd never have proposed
ed sewage,officials said.The city ing to Nelson Wong, senior engi. it,"Sylvester said."The(3Smem-
a'f Ios Angeles is veering in an op• . neer for the Los Angeles Regional bar district)board of directors has
posits direction and soon will rely Water Quality Control Board. But
already gone on record saying they
on a sludgo-tcenergy plant. passage of the Clean Water Act in would stop it if it were ever seen as
Because the federal Clean Water 1972 made ocean sludge-dumping harmful."
Act of 1t prohibited dumb. illegal,and the city was sued by the But Orange County enviroomen-
Sudgeinthescean,OrangeCounty EPA in 1977. tulists such as Lorraine Faber,
trust be granted a waiver that ofB- The city agreed to stop dumping past president of the Amigos de
orals hope will be included in Ne by may 1980 but was unable to Boise Chica, oppose the idea.
ienewal of the law being consfd- mcetthat deadline and laterexten- "You can't keep dumping poi.
'!rail by a joint committce of the - sions because the project that will sonous materials into an arcs with-
j).S. Senate and House of Repro- replace the pipeline has not been out it having a bad effect" she
aentatives. completed, Wong said. City offi said."It's an indication they don't
The House passed a version of cials hope the project will be fin- care about the quality of the 1r/
the, renewed bill approving the ished this year, he said. ocean.-
pprpeline, but the Senate's version But Sylvester contended that the Both Orange County's plan for
2_d not include the pipeline. Con- sludge line proposed for Orange deep-sea sludge disposal and Los
pass could approve a final version County has "nothing in common" Angeles'conversion to a sludge-to-
as early as next month, Orange with the seven-mile Los Angeles energy plant grew cut of a six-year
xtounry officials said.. pipeline. Because the proposed study of sludge disposal, complet-
But local environmentalists said pipeline will be longer and deeper, ed in 1980.
the proposed sludge line violates the sludge will be sucked out to sea The study recommended that
She intent of the Clean Water Act, by stronger currents and settle on 'further research be given the deep. i
which pmhibited sludge dumping. the ocean Ocor, he said. sea disposal plan,Sylvester said.
They also question why such a Sylvester also said that Orange Caltech and NOAA completed .
project is being proposed for Or- County sludge is more heavily preliminary engineering and soi-
;pnge County jug as city officials in treated than Los Angeles sludge entific studies of the idea in 1982
Los Angeles are closing a contra and is safer to dump. and --concluded that there was a
1persial sludge line under orders by The Orange County Sanitation good likelihood that it would be ac-
he EPA and replacing it with a Oistrict currently handles 190,000 cepted environmentally;' Sylves-
Imil million energy plant. pounds of dried sludge daily. It is ter said.They recommended 6he S-
a "We're trying to get&sludge line now trucked to the Coyote Canyon year research project now pm
Font of Santa Monica Bay, and landfill near the University of Cali- posed,Sylvester said.
RE : AGENDA ITEM #8
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
OF NOMINEE FOR
JOINT CHAIRMAN
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
�• P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA W728-8127
q�� + 108/9 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92788-7018
Q1IJ 962 2411
July 3, 1986
TO: Directors, Orange County Sanitation Districts
At the July Joint Board meeting you will select the Joint Chairman for the next
year. As you know, I was nominated to serve in that capacity at the June
meeting and herewith request your vote to be selected as Joint Chairman for
1986-87.
I have been honored this past year to work with each of you and staff to
continue the important work of the Districts. We are progressing on a positive
course and have accomplished a great deal this past year. It is impossible to
list these within this brief statement of my interest, but I believe you are
very aware of our numerous accomplishments.
At the same time we must continue to focus on the County's future and the
Districts' ability to sustain the quality of service for the citizenry. The
Directors, in cooperation with staff, will for the foreseeable future be heavily
involved in developing methods to deal with the on-going environmental, water
quality and operational and maintenance issues.
I am prepared to serve you for one more year as Joint Chairman to meet the
provocative challenges and to seek practical solutions for the benefit of our
proud community and the Sanitation Districts.
Your support is very much appreciated. I look forward to the coming year with
every bit as much enthusiasm and interest as I had last year to serve with you.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Don A. Griffin
Joint Chairman
V�
RE : AGENDA ITEM NO . 13
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714) 962-2411
July 2, 1986
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services to Conduct
Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch. Ocean
outfall, Specification No. S-032, for Contract Period No. 2
(Amendment No. 3).
On April 26, 1985 the Districts issued a Request for Proposals to provide Ocean
Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification
No. S-032 required by the Districts' new NPOES permit. After evaluation of
seven respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science
Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to provide these services for the
- five-year life of the permit and negotiated a fee for year one.
The negotiated cost to the Districts for year one was $917,680. This was
increased to $1,002,705 with the addition of Amendment No. 1 for additional lab
instrumentation and laboratory work and Amendment No. 2 for ocean current
studies. Both of these amendments were changes in the scope of work in response
to EPA requirements.
Staff has evaluated the SAIC price proposal for continuing the agreement through
year two and reported to the Selection Committee. SAIC has proposed a
$1,530,486 effort for year two. The basis for this proposal is the experience
gained by SAIC in conducting the program during the first year and further
expansion of the scope of work to accomodate EPA requirements. SAIC submitted
a total of three versions of the proposal during.extensive evaluation and
discussions between SAIC and Districts' staff during May and June. As a result
of this review, SAIC's initial proposal for year two has been reduced by more
than $153,000.
The total increase from year one is $527,781. This includes significant
increases in the scope of work caused by the addition of the ocean current
monitoring program approved by the Joint Boards in May 1986 for $204,628, and
mussel assessment, which will commence during year two costing $43,243. -
Considering these two programs as not affecting the increase of the basic
program of year one, the actual basic program increase for year two is $279,910
which is a 22% increase. The enclosed staff report provides a detailed analysis
of the cost increases.
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for negotiating professional
engineering/architectural services, the Selection Committee has negotiated with
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for conducting Ocean
Monitoring Contract Services for Contract Period No. 2. As shown in Attachment
1, Contract Period Number 2 consists of ocean monitoring from July, 1986 through
June, 1987, data management and interpretation continuing beyond June 30, 1987
and an annual report that must be submitted to EPA and the RWQCB by January 30,
1988. The negotiated cost, including all professional services, direct
expenses, equipment, overhead, and profit is the lump sum amount of $1,530,486.
The Selection Committee wishes to emphasize for the Boards' information that
SAIC 's efforts involve considerable field time in the conduct of the sampling
tasks. The basic elements are shown in Attachment 2. Weather conditions and
difficulties in obtaining sufficient marine organisms can dramatically influence
the time required to complete a specified task. SAIC has made assumptions in
their second year price proposal that are based on their first year experience.
In the event that conditions occur that are beyond SAIC's control, then the
Selection Committee will negotiate any change orders submitted by SAIC and then
submit them to the Joint Boards for their review and approval .
The Selection Committee hereby certifies that SAIC's cost proposal is reasonable
and will not result in excessive profits for SAIC. The Selection Committee
recommends that the Joint Boards approve Amendment No. 3 to Specification No.
S-032 for Science Applications International Corporation to provide ocean
monitoring contract services during year two for the lump sum amount of
$1,530,486.
/s/ Don R. Griffin /s/ Don E. Smith
Don R. Griffin Don E. Smith
Joint Chairman vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Member Selection Committee Member
/s/ Richard B. Edgar /s/ Blake P. Anderson
Richard B. Edgar Blake P. Anderson
Chairman Director of Operations
Selection Committee Member Selection Committee Member
7/3/86
ATTACHMENT 1
OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES
✓ FOR
DISTRICTS' 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL
CONTRACT PERIOD NO. 2
Month #
1 July 86 Begin monitoring Begin boat work Deploy current meters
year 62
2 Aug 86
3 Sep 86
4 Oct 86 Quarterly meeting
5 Nov 86
6 Dec 86
7 Jan 87 Quarterly meeting
8 Feb 87
9 Mar 87
10 Apr 87 Quarterly meeting
11 May 87
12 June 87 End monitoring
year 82
13 July 87 Quarterly meeting
14 Aug 87
15 Sep 87
16 Oct 87 Data Submission Quarterly meeting
year M2
17 Nov 87
18 Dec 87
19 Jan 88 Annual report Quarterly meeting
year d2
7/3/86.
ATTACHMENT 2
OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES
FOR
DISTRICTS' 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS OF PERMIT
CONTRACT PERIOD NO. 2
Element Responsibility
Influent monitoring Districts
Effluent monitoring Districts
Shore station monitoring Districts
Water quality monitoring Contractor
Ocean currents Contractor
Benthic monitoring Contractor
Trawling Contractor
Rig fishing Contractor
Mussle assessment Contractor
Anchovy study Pending
Asbestos study Pending
Data analysis Districts/Contractor
Data summary and interpretation Districts/Contractor
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
Et ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
June 26, 1986 1O EW AVENUE
P.O.WXDiv
F Wm vA .CLfIfO 821 ia7
masezzan
mA,yp.Ey,a
STAFF REPORT
OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES
SPECIFICATION NO. S-032
YEAR TWO
Introduction
On August 7, 1985 the Districts entered into a five-year agreement with Science
Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to perform the marine monitoring
activities required by the Districts' 301(h) permit. Annual price adjustments
were to be negotiated during May and June of each year. On May 7, 1986 SAIC
submitted a proposal for the continuation of the agreement through year two.
Upon review by staff the proposal was considered unacceptable and discussions
with SAIC took place to communicate the Districts' concerns. SAIC responded
with a second proposal on May 15, 1986. Further evaluation and discussion with
SAIC resulted in a third and final cost proposal submitted on June 6, 1986.
This final revision of year two costs to the Districts is shown in Table 1.
Evaluation
A comparison of year one costs and the year two cost proposal is shown in
Table 2. There has been a significant increase in the scope occurring as a
result of the addition of the ocean currents task and the mussel assessment
task. These tasks were part of the original permit requirements but their
execution was delayed until the EPA, the RWpCB, and the Districts agreed on
their technical details.
First Proposal - May 7, 1986
The majority of the cost increases are a result of increased labor and ship
time including an additional monthly survey not included in year one,
additional boat personnel for suspended solids filtration, and separate
processing of trawl and rig fish for onboard histopathological work and
onshore priority pollutant analyses. A greater number of samples were
required to complete the water quality determinations than were estimated
for year one. Additional labor is also associated with coordinating and
conducting the field surveys, data management, data submittals to EPA's
national computer, report preparation, and program management. Other
increases are associated with changes in analytical methods.
Total additional program costs (subtotal) itemized in the first draft, less
the ocean current study and mussel assessment, were $461.621.
1
Second Proposal - May 15, 1986
The second proposal of the year two costs reflects the "minimal effort"
necessary to complete each task based on the experience acquired during year
one. For some tasks, minimal effort represents effort less than that
outlined in the permit but reflects what was demonstrated as practical under
the actual conditions around our outfall . This contrasts with SAIC's
approach in the first proposal which provided sufficient additional effort
to more than comply with the permit. SAIC believes, and staff concurs, that
this approach is the only way in which to provide signficant cost
reductions. The area exhibiting the greatest reduction is that of labor
since it is directly related to the assumed number of samples and number of
hours. The minimal effort approach embodies certain assumptions which
establish limited hours, samples, and analyses. The result of this approach
is a 12.4% decrease in proposed labor costs from the first proposal
(Tattle 3).
Another area that is affected by this approach is Other Direct Costs (ODC).
These include such areas as ship time, laboratory equipment, travel , per
diem, telephone, field service, vehicle service, temporary employees,
graphics, word processing, and reproduction. Because the assumed number of
samples and analyses is expected to be less than that anticipated in the
first proposal, the cost of ODC is reduced by 6.6% in proposal no. 2 (Table'
4). SAIC has represented to the staff that the total of ODC for year one is
not reliable for comparison because the initial proposal regarding ODC
included areas that were highly estimated.
Labor reductions to minimal effort are established in shipboard hours for
the water quality, benthic, trawl, and rig fishing surveys. Further labor
and ODC reductions are combined indirectly with the reduction in the number
of samples, analyses, and dissections performed. The reduction in the basic
program (Table 2, subtotal) from the May 7 proposal is $111,287.
Final Proposal - June 6, 1986
Continued evaluation of the May 15 proposal revealed additional areas of
concern. These include the time required to process and manage data,
complete reports, and administer and manage the program at the task level .
In keeping with the minimal effort approach, SAIC made reductions in the
management and coordination time associated with the trawling and data
management tasks.
Clarifying the definition of the October annual report requirement resulted
in further cost reductions. SAIC had first assumed they would spend a
significant amount of time on data interpretation. Staff objected on the
basis that this report requires submission of data in tabular form only. In
addition, by the incorporation of a modified data entry system at SAIC's
laboratories, reductions in data entry costs were made possible.
2
Management, administration, and coordination reductions resulted in a 7.6%
reduction in labor costs from the second draft (Table 3). However, ODC not
being labor related in this instance were reduced by less than one percent
(Table 4). The basic monitoring program (Table 2, subtotal ) for the final
proposal reflects a further reduction of $29,489.
Summary
The total increase from year one is $527,781. This includes significant
increases in the scope of work caused by the addition of the ocean current
monitoring program approved by the Joint Boards in May 1986 for $204,628, and
mussel assessment, which will commence during year two costing $43,243.
Considering these two programs as not affecting the increase of the basic
program of year one, the actual basic program increase for year .two is $279,910
which is a 22% increase. For reference, copies of the transmittal letters that
accompanied each proposal are included as Exhibit A.
The experience gained during the first year is the basis upon which SAIC has
provided the proposal for year two. This has resulted in significant increase
in cost in most areas of the program. The extent of the increase/decrease from
year one costs is shown in Table 5 as percent.
The changes associated with the Monthly Bacterial Sampling in Task A result from
minimal analytical cost increases, no change in scope of work, and, the labor
portion of the costs being combined with the labor costs of Monthly Chemical and
Physical Sampling. The significant change shown in Benthic Monitoring, Task B,
regarding Semiannual Bioaccumulation is attributable to the minimal effort
approach of SAIC. Reductions in the estimated numbers of samples affects trace
`..d metals and organics, and reduces survey time.
Task E, Data Summary and Interpretation, incorporates two major adjustments in
the computer data submittals to EPA. This data is entered into a central
computer in Virginia under the Ocean Data Evaluation System (ODES), and consists
of quarterly reports and the October annual report. SAIC has demonstrated to
staff's satisfaction that participating in the ODES reporting system has been
far more time consuming than anticipated. The increased cost is principally due
to the required manhours and computer time to ensure the appropriate level of
data QA when managing large numbers of data, working with the complexity of the
ODES coding, formatting, and identifying data qualifiers. The format of the
October annual report has been redefined from SAIC's earlier interpretaton of
the requirement, making the report simpler and thus requiring less effort.
The majority of the additional costs of the year two proposal reflect increases
in the time necessary for conducting surveys, sample preparation, and performing
the analytical work. Minimal effort based on first year experience is one
method to reduce the cost to the Districts. However, SAIC has proposed in their
May 15 submittal , to request additional funds should more effort be required
beyond the eleven assumptions listed therein. This could lead to unforeseen
costs.
SAIC has increased the number of hours delegated to management and
administration of the various tasks. These increases appear appropriate and
insure adequate administrative overview of the program. In addition, the
reductions in the field and analytical areas do not indicate that there would be
a sacrifice in program quality.
3
Recommendation
A brief description of SAIC, as presented in the Review of Proposals Submitted
in Response to the RFP, June 1985, is provided in this report as Exhibit B. In
the beginning SAIC experienced some difficulty with preparing ODES submittals
and adhering, in a strict sense, to a few isolated conditions in the EPA
Guidance Document/Regulations. However, through the combined efforts of EPA,
the Districts, and SAIC, these areas have been resolved.
During the evaluation of the respondents to the original 1985 RFP, a vendor
comparison matrix was developed. The year one proposed costs of the three
remaining qualified vendors are compared with the year one and year two costs of
SAIC in Table 6. The year two costs from SAIC appear very favorable in
comparison to the original competitive cost proposals. One of the other
proposers, Kinnetic Labs/KPL, is-conducting the monitoring program for Encina. -
They have been awarded a 15% increase in the year two costs. Applying this same
escalation to Kinnetic Labs/KPL's original proposal to the Districts' would have
resulted in a projected second year cost of $1,740,751.
SAIC has worked constructively and professionally with the Districts and EPA in
providing ocean monitoring contract services. It is recommended that the
Districts maintain the services of SAIC and extend the existing contract to
include year two at a cost of $1,530,486.
4
TABLE 1
FINAL REVISION
OF YEAR 2 COSTS
Leber Other Profit/
Dollars• Direct Coate*• Subtotal Totals
TASK/SUBTASKS
A. OFFSHORE WATER QUALITY MONITORING
Monthly chemical 6 physical sampling $ 25,417 $ 98,245 $123,662
Monthly bacterial sampling 906 7,612 8,518
Quarterly chemical 6 physical sampling 6,677 47,740 54,417
Ocean current monitoring 78,509 126,119 204,628 -
$111,509 $279,716 $391,225
B. BENTHIC MONITORING
Quarterly sampling $ 13,499 $ 37,608 $ 51,107
Quarterly benthic infeena identification 0 115,72e 115,728
Quarterly chemical 6 physical analysis a 247,441 247,441
Seni-annual bioaccumulation 3,191 22,518 25,709
Annual sampling 1,803 7,537 9,340
Annual benthic infeune Identification 0 17,320 17,320
Annual chemical 6 physical analysis 0 64,153 64,153
$ 18,493 $512,305 $530,798
C. TRAWLS
Semi-annual trawl survey $ 3,867 $ 17,805 $ 21,672
Annual histopethology studies 1,057 12,768 13,825
Annual priority pollutant sampling 2,901 67,524 70,425
$ 7,825 $ 98,097 $105,922
�-/ D. RIC FISHING
Fish consumption survey $ 308 $ 869 $ 1,177
Semi-ennual Fish survey 543 12,023 12,566
Semi-annual priority pollutant sampling 2,901 11,241 14,142
Annual histopethology studio. 543 3,186 3,729
$ 4,295 $ 27,319 $ 31,614
E. DATA SUMMARY 6 INTERPRETATION
Quarterly ODES report $ 40,432 $ 21,995 $ 62,427
October 30 annual report 1,281 11,297 12,578
January 30 annual report 29,831 45,137 74,968
Date storage, management 7,503 89,599 77,102
$ 79,047 $168,028 $247,075
F ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Liaison with District/management $ 20,098 $ 8,645 $ 28,743
Quarterly review seating with District 7,097 3,144 10,241
Camara ready copies of report 180 230 410
$ 27,375 $ 12,019 $ 39,394
G. PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS
Mussel assessment $ 13,a17 $29,426 $ 43,243
Equipment contingencies 10,300 10,300
Weather contingencies 10,300 10,300
PROGRAM TOTALS $262,361 $1,147,510 $1,409,871 $ 120,615
$1,530,486
• Includes Overhead at 62%, Fringe Benefits
at 40%, and General 6 Administrative at 13%.
••Includes General 6 Administrative at 13% on
other direct costa and MIS Overhead on major
subcontractors at 2.5%.
TABLE 2
PRICE COMPARISON BETWEEN
OCEAN MONITORING YEARS ONE AND TWO
Year Two
May 7 May 15 June 6
Year One Proposal Proposal Proposal
TASK
A. OFFSHORE WATER QUALITY MONITORING
Subtsska A.1 - A.3 $104,586 $220,502 $186,597 $186,597
B. BENTHIC MONITORING 423,013 576,720 530,798 530,798
C. TRAWLS 79,328 122,379 106,816 105,922
0. RIG FISHING 20,915 34,516 31,614 _ 31,614
E. DATA SUMMARY 4 INTERPRETATION 162,634 287,782 275,670 247,946
F. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 30,079 40,277 39,394 39,394
SUBTOTAL (COST) $820,555 $1,282,176 $1,170,889 $1,141,400
A.4 (OCEAN CURRENTS)• $ 32,089 $204,628 $204,628 $204,628
G. (MUSSEL ASSESSMENT)» N/A 42,791 42,791 43,243./
EQUIPMENT/MEATHER CONTINGENCIES M/A 20,600 20,600 20,600
SUBTOTAL (COST) $852,644 $1,550,195 $1,430,908 $1,409,871
PROFIT $ 87,824 $133,415 $123,161 $120,615
TOTAL $940,468 $1,683,610 $1,562,069 $1,530,486
t Subtask expanded significantly during year two based on EPA requirements
+• New task commencing in year two
TABLE 3
EVOLUTION OF PROPOSED LABOR-
COSTS PER TASK/SUBTASK
May 7 May 15 June 6
TASK/SUBTASKS
A. OFFSHORE WATER QUALITY MONITORING
Monthly chaoical 6 physical ewpling $ 30,395 $ 25,417 $ 25,417
Monthly bacterial awpling 3,449 906 906
Quarterly chemical 6 physical sapling 13,803 6,677 6,677
Ocean current monitoring 78,509 78,509 78,509
$126,156 $111,509 $111,509
B. BENTHIC MONITORING
Quarterly swpling $ 18,074 $ 13,499 $ 13,499
Quarterly benthic infauna identification 0 0 0
Quarterly chemical 6 physical analysis 0 0 0
Semi-annual bioaccumulation S,549 3,191 3,191
Annual aeapling 2,438 1,803 1,803
Annual benthic infouns identification 0 0 0
Annual chemical 6 physical analysis 0 0 0
$ 26,061 $ 18,493 $ 18,493
C. TRAWLS
Semi-annual trawl survey $ 6,661 $ 5,318 $ 3,867
Annual histopethology studies 1$762 1,057 1,057
Annual priority pollutant sampling 2,331 2,331 2,901
$ 10,754 $ 8,706 $ 7,825
0. RIG FISHING
Fish connawptien survey $ 484 $ 308 $ 308
Semi-annual fish survey 897 543 543
Semi-annual priority pollutant swpling 3,476 2,901 2,901
Annual histepathology studies 897 543 543
$ 5,754 $ 4,295 $ 4,295
E. DATA SUMMARY 4 INTERPRETATION
Quarterly ODES report $ 53,468 $ 51,269 $ 40,432
October 30 annual report 18,619 9,459 1,281
January 30 annual report 27,777 29,831 29,831
Data storage, aanagement 7,503 7,503 7,503
$107,367 $ 98,062 $ 79,047
F. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Liaison with Districts/management $ 20,098 $ 20,098 $ 20,098
Quarterly review meeting with District 7,097 7,097 7,097
Cwera reedy copies of report lea 180 1S0
$ 27,375 $ 27,375 $ 27,375
G. PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS
Mussel asse9went $ 13,817 $ 13,817 $ 13,817
PROGRAM TOTALS $317,284 $282,257 $262,361
• include. Overhead at 625,
Fringe Benefits at 40%,
and General and Administrative
at 13%.
TABLE 4
EVOLUTION OF PROPOSED OTHER DIRECT COSTS-
PER TASK/SUBTASK
May 7 May 15 June 6
TASK/SUBTASKS
A. OFFSHORE WATER QUALITY MONITORING
Monthly chemical 6 physical sampling $110,456 $ 98,245 $ 98,245
Monthly bacterial sampling 7,650 7,612 7,612
Quarterly chemical 4 physical sampling 54,749 47,740 47,740
Ocean currant monitoring 126,119 126,119 126,119
$298,974 $279,716 $279,716
B. BENTHIC MONITORING
Quarterly sampling $ 33,003 $ 37,608 $ 37,608
Quarterly benthlc infauna identification 119,383 115,728 115,728
Quarterly chemical h physical analysis 251,886 247,441 247,441
Semi-annual bioaccumulation 54,873 22,518 22,518
Annual sampling 6,316 7,537 7,537
Annual benthic infauna identification 17,843 17,320 17,320
Annual chemical 6 physical analysis 65,355 64,153 64,153
$550,659 $512,305 $512,305
C. TRAWLS
Semi-annual trawl survey $ 18,239 $ 17,827 $ 17,805
Annual hietopathology studies 12,778 12,768 12,768
Annual priority pollutant sampling 80,608 67,515 67,524
$111,625 $ 98,110 $ 98,097
D. RIG FISHING
Fish consumption survey $ 870 $ 869 $ 869
Semi-annual fish survey 11,799 12,023 12,023
Semi-ennual priority pollutant sampling 12,160 11,241 11,241
Annual hietopathology studies 3,933 3,186 3,186
$ 28,762 $ 27,319 $ 27,319
E. DATA SUMMARY 6 INTERPRETATION
Quarterly ODES report $ 20,087 $ 20,523 $ 21,995
October 30 annual report 21,480 18,512 11,297
January 30 annual report 46,072 45,799 45,137
Data storage, management 92,776 92,774 89,599
$180,415 $177,608 $168,028
F. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Liaison with District/management $ 9,528 $ 8,645 $ 8,645
Quarterly review meeting with District 3,144 3,144 3,144
Camera ready copies of report 230 230 230
$ 12,902 $ 12,019 $ 12,019
G. PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS
Mussel assessment $ 28,974 $ 28,974 $ 29,426
Equipment contingencies 10,300 10,300 10,300
Weather contingencies 10,300 10,300 10,300
PROGRAM TOTALS $1,232,911 $1,156,651 $1,147,510
includes General and Administrative
at 13% on other direct costs and M4S -
Overhead on major subcontractors at 2.5%.
TABLE 5
PERCENT CHANGE FROM YEAR ONE
PER YEAR TWO PROPOSALS
"NOV
Year One May 7 May 15 June 6
Coate M Proposal(%) Proposal(%) Proposal(%)
TASK/SUBTASKS
A. OFFSHORE WATER QUALITY MONITORING
Monthly chemical 6 physical sampling $ 66,943 110 85 85
Monthly bacterial sampling 12,120 < B > < 30 > < 30 >
Quarterly chemical 6 physical sampling 25,523 168 113 113
Ocean current monitoring 94,326 117 117 117
$198,912 114 96 96
B. BENTHIC MONITORING
Quarterly sampling $ 26,807 98 90 90
Quarterly benthic infauna identification 78,401 52 47 47
Quarterly chemical 6 physical analysis 184,499 36 34 34
Semi-annual bioaccumulation 41,951 44 < 39 > < 39 >
Annual sampling 9,791 < 30 > < 5 > < 5 >
Annual benthic infauna identification 12,476 43 39 39
Annual chemical 6 physical analysis 48,372 35 32 32
$423,013 36 25 25
C. TRAWLS
Semi-ennuel trawl survey $ 16,653 49 39 30
Annual histopathology studies 10,245 42 35 35
Annual priority pollutant sampling 32,430 58 33 34
$ 79,320 54 34 33
D. RIG FISHING
Fish consumption survey 1,071 26 10 10
Semi-annual Fish survey 6,843 85 83 83
k./ Semi-annual priority pollutant sampling 9,586 63 47 47
Annual hietopathology studies 3,415 41 9 9
$ 20,915 65 51 51
E. DATA SUMMARY 6 INTERPRETATION
Quarterly ODES report $ 4,498 1535 1496 1287
October 30 annual report 13,228 203 ill < 5 >
January 30 annual report 47,089 57 60 59
Date storage, management 97,819 3 3 < 1 >
$162,634 77 69 52
F ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Liaison with Districts/management $ 21,106 40 36 36
Quarterly review meeting with District 7,111 44 43 43
Camera ready copies of report 1,862 < 78 > < 78 > < 78 >
$ 30,079 34 31 31
G. PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS
Mussel assessment N/A 100 100 100
Equipment contingencies N/A 100 100 100
Weather contingencies N/A 100 TOO 100
PROFIT $ 87,824 52 40 37
PROGRAM TOTALS (lase program modifications) $1,002,705 61 49 46
PROGRAM TOTALS (incl. program modifications) $1,002,705 60 56 52
�� w includes Amendment No. 1
TABLE 6
COST COMPARISON OF SAIC AND OTHER QUALIFIED
VENDORS FROM RFP RESPONSE LIST
Science
Kinvatic Lab/ Bra. 6 Applications
K.P. Lindstrom ECO Celdvell Intl Corp.
year 1 Year 2
Offshore
Meter Quality • $282,070 $672,471 $466,181 $136,675 $391,225
Benthic $632,MI $901,157 $706,465 $402,297 $530,798
Trawls $ 95,352 $ 92,121 $121,778 $ 79,328 $105,922
Rig Fish $ 54,768 $ 22,142 $ 32,875 $ 20,915 $ 31,614
Data Suseary
Interpretation $413,670 $484,402 $385,804 $162,634 $247,946
Additional
Services $ 45,824 $ 21,414 $ 23,846 $ 30,079 $ 39,394
Total Coat $1,513,697 $2,193,707 $1,736,949 $917,680 $1,530,486
Offshore
aster quality
lees current �a•✓
study mats $118,000 $302,000 $254,000 $100,0aa $187,000
• includes current study program
EXHIBIT A.
Science AppficadnmhtrresoralCon>dadon .
\.W/ May 7, 1986
Mr. Blake Anderson
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and its subcontractor
Marine Ecological Consultants (MEC) are pleased to submit this price proposal
to conduct Year 2 0£ the District's 301(h) Ocean Monitoring Program in
accordance with the Agreement of August 1985 between the Districts and SAIC.
The technical scope of work generally is the same as for the Year 1 program
(see Attachment A) with some notable changes required on some tasks:
(1) Twelve monthly water quality surveys instead of eleven (Year 1 -
August 1985 through June 1986; Year 2 - July 1986 through June
1987) . Affects Tasks A and E.
(2) Water quality samples for ammonia (NH3) analysis will be collected
and frozen onboard the survey vessel for subsequent analysis by a
shore based laboratory (Amtech) using an auto-analyzer (automated
phonate method). This change is necessary since the probe method
originally proposed does not provide sufficiently accurate
results. SAIC eliminated the use of a probe after the August 1985
survey, and has been preserving (acidifying) the samples to date
and analyzing them using a colorimetric method. All methods are
EPA approved, however, the price for the non-probe analyses are
additional (were not planned for in Year 1 estimates) . Affects
Task A.
(3) Water quality samples for analysis of total suspended solids (TSS)
will be filtered onboard the survey vessel to improve detection
limits by filtering a larger volume (one liter) of water than
collected for Year 1 (one-half liter) . Year one samples were
collected and returned to the laboratory for filtration, thus
limiting the sample volumes that could be practically transported.
Both methods involve filtering through a pre-weighed filter,
drying, and final weighing to determine TSS. Affects Task A.
(4) Trawl and rig fishing samples for histopathology and priority
pollutant analyses will be collected from separate individuals of
the target species. Specimens for histopathology will be dissected
and preserved onboard the survey vessel, while specimens for
priority pollutant analysis will be frozen onboard for subsequent
dissection and analysis under clean-room Laboratory conditions.
The Year 1 method of analyzing the same specimen for both
histopathology and chemistry (as originally requested by the
permit) did not allow for acceptable processing for either
parameter. Affects Tasks C and D.
Division of Applied Environmental Sciences 476 Prospect Street, La Jolla California 92037 (619) 456.7462
ome,Vvc Omcee Amwuemua tn,n4a O ~peewr.Nwf.0 I.M9 .a.n M onenee.Son OM9a San FmnuaCO *„non ena wum,p a,oc
(5) Greater average numbers of water quality samples (e.g. , >30% more
for TSS) are required for collection and analysis than were
estimated for Year 1. Affects Tasks A and E.
(6) Laboratory analytical costs, particularly for organics, trace
metals and infauna are substantially higher than anticipated for
Year 1 due to EPA methods changes required for the priority
pollutant analyses, and the high diversity of the biological
samples. For example, the GPC step for the organics samples
typically must be repeated two to three times to adequately
clean-up the samples, and the costs for the C 18 column step could
not be "absorbed" into the original price per sample. Affects
Tasks B, C, and D.
(7) Additional labor is associated with coordinating and conducting
the field surveys. Affects Tasks A, B, C, and D.
(8) Additional labor and computer costs are associated with data
handling/management, ODES submittals, and report preparation; this
additional effort is related in part to the greater number of -
samples collected (e.g. , 5 above) . Affects Task E.
(9) Additional labor is associated with program management. Affects
Task E.
Two new/modified tasks required for Year 2 are the ocean current study and the
mussel assessment program. These tasks and the associated costs represent
contract modifications for Year 2 that are in addition to the Year 1 scope of
work.
The price proposal to conduct the Year 2 program is presented in Attachment B
along with a brief summary (Table B-1) of the scope of work represented by each
task. A price comparison by task between Years 1 and 2 is presented in Table
B-2. Due to some redefinition between years among the subtasks, the most
direct comparison, as presented in Table B-2, is at the task level although
Year 2 estimates by subtask are included with the price proposal.
SAIC has provided price estimates that are based on our direct experience from
the Year 1 program, and would welcome a detailed discussion with District staff
on our technical and cost assumptions. We are very aware of budgetary
considerations by the District and will work with you to clarify and refine the
level of effort to best accomodate the program goals and objectives.
Our fixed price proposal for Year Two is based on the assumption that all terms
and conditions for the current agreement will remain unchanged. It is anticir.
pated that the negotiated value for the second period will be added to the
current value.
Please contact me at (619) 456-7420 if you have any questions of a contractual
nature, or Dr. Andrew Lissner at (619) 456-7471 or Charlie Phillips at (619)
456-7491 for questions of a technical nature. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Betty . Bidwell _
Seni Contracts Representative
/sav
Or 7
May 15, 1986 scapd<+6o.slfaonucoa�eaon �.,/
Mr. Blake Anderson
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and its subcontractor
Marine Ecological Consultants (MEC) are pleased to submit this revised price
proposal to conduct Year 2 of the District's 301(h) Ocean Monitoring Program in
accordance with the Agreement of August 1985 between the Districts and SAIC.
This revised proposal represents a decrease of $121,541 from the May 7, 1986
submittal . Our original price submission of May 7 was based on the defined
levels of efforts in the District's 301(h) permit and our assumptions
associated with those levels. During Contract Period 1, SAIC found that it was
not necessary to expend the maximum levels of effort to meet some permit
requirements. Therefore, it is possible for SAIC to offer a lower overall
price based on our Year One experience, In order to offer this lower price,
SAIC requests that Contract Exhibit B be modified to reflect these 11
additional assumptions listed below and SAIC's option to request additional
funds should any of the assumptions be different. The revised assumptions are:
(1) Task A.3 and A.4 - no more than a total of 24 hours of shipboard
weather/equipment delays will be experienced by SAIL during the Year 2
water quality surveys. SAIC/MEC has budgeted $20,600 for these
contingencies based on Year 1 costs and their greater risk primarily
due to survey vessel costs.
(2) Task B.1, B.4, and B.5 - no more than a total of 12 hours of shipboard
weather/equipment delays will be experienced by SAIC during the year 2
benthic surveys. SAIC/MEC contingency is included in the cost noted
in (1) above.
(3) Task B.4 - no more than 168 grab samples (ave. = 7/station) will be
necessary to complete the Year 2 bioaccumulation surveys.
(4) Task B.4 - no more than 15 analyses (including 10% QA requirements)
for priority pollutants will be necessary for the Year 2
bioaccumulation study.
(5) Task C.2 and C.3 - no more than 3 trawls/station will be necessary for
the Year 2 histopathology/priority pollutant survey.
(6) Task C.2 - no more than eight hours of survey time will be necessary
for the Year 2 on board dissections for histopathology.
(7) Task C.3 - no more than 300 dissections of fish (ave. - 20
individuals/sample), or 225 dissections of invertebrates (ave. 15
Individuals/sample will be necessary for the Year 2 priority pollutant
analyses.
Division of Applied Environmental Sciences, 476 Prospect Street, La Jolla, California 92037 (619) 456-7462 -
Oma,sa/C Omcu:nwuwamua C,.,.GaWen.ean.a,.aongwYe.Loa<npaYa Oak aaaa.OMnaa san O"a san r�aca ruyon oM ft.O,,Wa Oc
l
(8) Task C.3 - no more than 50 analyses (includes 10% QA requirements) for
priority pollutants will be necessary for the Year 2 priority
pollutant study of trawl fish and invertebrates.
(9) Task D.3 - no more than 60 dissections of fish (ave. = 10/sample) will
be necessary for the Year 2 rig fishing priority pollutant study.
(10) Task 0.3 - no more than 8 hours of survey time will be necessary for
the Year 2 on board dissections of fish collected from the rig fishing
histopathology study.
(11) Task F.3 - the camera ready copy of the October and January Final
Reports is defined as a master version of the text, printed on a laser
printer, and associated figures and tables. This master will be
acceptable for production of copies, but will not be typeset.
The technical scope of work generally is the same as for the Year 1 program
(see Attachment A) with some notable changes required on some tasks:
(1) Twelve monthly water quality surveys instead of eleven (Year 1 -
August 1985 through June 1986; Year 2 = July 1986 through June
1987). Affects Tasks A and E.
(2) Water quality samples for ammonia (NH3) analysis will be collected
and frozen onboard the survey vessel for subsequent analysis by a
shore based laboratory (Amtech) using an auto-analyzer (automated
phenate method) . This change is necessary since the probe method
• originally proposed does not provide sufficiently accurate
results. SAIC eliminated the use of a probe after the August 1985
survey, and has been preserving (acidifying) the samples to date
and analyzing them using a colorimetric method. All methods are
EPA approved, however, the price for the non-probe analyses are
additional (were not planned for in Year 1 estimates) . Affects
Task A.
(3) Water quality samples for analysis of total suspended solids (TSS)
will be filtered onboard the survey vessel to improve detection
limits by filtering a larger volume (one liter) of water than
collected for Year 1 (one-half liter) . Year one samples were
collected and returned to the laboratory for filtration, thus
limiting the sample volumes that could be practically transported.
Both methods involve filtering through a pre-weighed filter,
drying, and final weighing to determine TSS. Affects Task A.
(4) Trawl and rig fishing samples for histopathology and priority
pollutant analyses will be collected from separate individuals of
the target species. Specimens for histopathology will be dissected
and preserved onboard the survey vessel , while specimens for
priority pollutant analysis will be frozen onboard for subsequent
dissection and analysis under clean-room laboratory conditions.
The Year 1 method of analyzing the same specimen for both
histopathology and chemistry (as originally requested by the
permit) did not allow for acceptable processing for either
parameter. Affects Tasks C and D.
(5) Greater average numbers of water quality samples (e.g., >30% more
for TSS) are required for collection and. analysis than were
estimated for Year 1. Affects Tasks A and E.
(6) Laboratory analytical costs, particularly for organics, trace
metals and infauna are.substantially higher than anticipated for
Year 1 due to EPA methods changes required for the priority
pollutant analyses, and the high diversity of the biological
samples. For example, the GPC step for the organics samples
typically must be repeated two to three times to adequately
clean-up the samples, and the costs for the C column step could
not be "absorbed" into the original price Or sample. Affects
Tasks B, C, and D.
(7) Additional labor is associated with coordinating and conducting
the field surveys. Affects Tasks A, B, C, and D.
(8) Additional labor and computer costs are associated with data
handling/management, ODES submittals, and report preparation; this
additional effort is related in part to the greater number of
samples collected (e.g., 5 above). Affects Task E.
(9) Additional labor is associated with program management. Affects
Task E.
Two new/modified tasks required for Year 2 are the ocean current study and the
mussel assessment program. These tasks and the associated costs represent
contract modifications for Year 2 that are in addition to the Year 1 scope of
work. l../
The price proposal to conduct the Year 2 program is presented in Attachment B
along with a brief summary (Table B-1) of the scope of work represented by each
task. A price comparison by task between Years 1 and 2 is presented in Table
B-2. Due to some redefinition between years among the subtasks, the most
direct comparison, as presented in Table B-2, is at the task level although
Year 2 estimates by subtask are included with the price proposal .
A detailed listing and rationale for increases in specific tasks between Year 1
and Year 2 is presented in Attachment C.
As for the initial draft submitted on May 7, 1986, SAIC has provided price
estimates that are based on our direct experience from the Year 1 program, and
will respond to any questions on our technical and cost assumptions. Assuming
the same scope of work, we do not anticipate any significant changes, other
than normal escalation (-5%) for Years 3, 4, and 5 than is reflected by the
Year 2 costing. We are very aware of budgetary considerations by the District
and will work with you to clarify and refine the level of effort to best
accomodate the program goals and objectives.
Our fixed price proposal for Year Two is based on the assumption that the
eleven key assumptions specified herein will be added to the contract, but that
all other terms and conditions for the current agreement will remain unchanged.
It is anticipated that the negotiated value for the second period will be added
to the current value.
Please contact me at (619) 456-7420 if you have any questions of a contractual
nature, or Dr. Andrew Lissner at (619) 456-7471 or Charlie Phillips at (619)
456-7491 for questions of a technical nature. Thank you.
Sincerely, 2ehl
ttyjCtiacts
l
Senio Representative
/sav
XA
scaKeAppl%caaautncnatlona/ca+por®r/m
June 6, 1986
Mr. Blake Anderson
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIL) and its subcontractor
Marine Ecological Consultants (MEC) are pleased to submit this revised price
proposal to conduct Year 2 of the District's 301(h) Ocean Monitoring Program in
accordance with the Agreement of August 1985 between the Districts and SAIL.
This revised proposal represents a further decrease of $31,583 from the May 15,
1986 submittal and largely reflects (1) a redefinition of Task E.2, October
Final (ODES) Report, such that this task is understood to represent two copies
of the quarterly ODES reports from Task E.1, with no additional interpretation;
(2) reduced data entry costs based on a modified system that will become a
standard part of SAIC's laboratory capabilities during Year 2; and (3)
reductions in management and coordination time associated with Tasks C. I and
E.4. All other assumptions and definitions of the technical scope of work are
the same as specified in the May 7 and May 15 submittals. The fallowing
information is provided as a back-up to this revised proposal :
a Revised,' detailed price printout (proprietary rate information)
o Revised, signed price summary
o Revised, price summary indicating changes among Year 1 and the three
Year 2 proposal versions
o Revised rationale summary for differences between Year 1 and Year 2
prices
Please note that we have specifically addressed Tasks A.3, B. 1, C.1, C.3, E. 1,
E.2, E.3, and E.4 and provided additional , detailed rationale based on our
meeting on May 29 with Al Ursic and Mike Heinz.
Due to the complexities of the upcoming July annual survey (first survey of
Year 2) and the lead-time required for boat and equipment modifications for
new/revised methods (e.g. , trawl histopathology/chemistry, and TSS) , it is
critical for SAIC to work closely and continuously with the Districts to ensure
a signed Year 2 contract modification on or before July 1, 1986. This amount _
of lead-time also is essential to allow ordering and preparation of the large
number of sample containers required for the survey.
D,q,S,on of applied Environmental Sciences. 476 Prospect Street. La Jolla California 92037 (619) 456-7462
YRr 5<iC Uucw .YeuqueNua Cnsagn DiYOA Oa^vnt Numsnue ws angNev oax auge,nnaMa.son Oegq.son fmcxn iu[Se�ana wasrvnqgn uc
June 6, 1986
Page 2
SAIC is proud of its contributions to the Year I program and looks forward to a
continued, mutually beneficial relationship with the Districts. Please contact
me at (619) 456-7420 for questions of a contractual nature, or Dr. Andrew
Lissner at (619) 456-7471 or Charlie Phillips at (619) 456-7491 for questions
of a technical nature. Thank you.
Sincerely,,, /
Betty 61� Bidwerl
Senior, ontracts Representative
/sav
EXHIBIT B
REVIEW OF PROPOSALS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE
TO RFP FROM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES
FOR
DISTRICTS' 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL, .
SPECIFICATION NO. S-032
JUNE 1985
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL - SAIC -
SAIC has extensive experience in monitoring programs and survey analysis.
They have conducted research and monitoring programs for private industry as
well as the US EPA, and NOAA. An extensive monitoring program of the New York
Bight was conducted by SAIC.
The firm is well established nation wide and is capable of large undertakings
involving marine chemistry, physical oceanography, marine biology and ecology.
They have the boats and equipment and indicate an adequate depth of highly
qualified personnel providing the security of contingency options.
Their current meter proposal is, very good. Their water quality analyzer
and transmissometer have the reputation of being unreliable, however, the
majority of monitoring programs incorporate this equipment. They are innovative
in reducing the risk of contaminated benthic samples.for chemical analysis.
SAIC would subcontract with Marine Ecological Consultants (MEC) for the marine
biology work. MEC is one of the few quality commercial biology labs in Southern
California.
Histopathology would be performed in Whittier, California, by the Chairman
of the Department of Biology at Whittier College. A good description of methods
is given which generally follows, standard techniques. Evaluation of tissues
`ollow the guidelines developed by NOAA and the US EPA.
The chemical analysis capability of SAIC is very good. Their proposal
listed detection limits for each priority pollutant. However, concern was
expressed that the values requested in the RFP addendum may be unattainable in
some cases. This may be due to strict adherence to EPA requirements and
definition of minimum detectable amounts. They have experience with dioxin and
are an EPA contract lab. In addition to routine practices, their proposal also
included methods for pA on benthic identification, water column sampling, and
microbiology.
The computer capabilities of SAIL and MEC are excellent. They both utilize
a very powerful SAS package. SAIC has the best verification and validation of
the data. SAIL/MEC represent two full computer systems and will retain detailed
records of all data, analyses, and support information for a minimum of five years. .
In their proposal, SAIC provides a detailed approach to each task showing
methods, detection limits, and major equipment required. - They demonstrate a
complete working knowledge of our program. They are a well established company
with all the right credentials.
KINNETIC/LINDSTROM �..✓
This joint venture brings together two organizations highly skilled and
experienced in scientific studies, permitting, environmental planning services,
preparation of 301(h) applications and consulting on EIR's. Kinnetic has
numerous on-going projects and previous projects have ranged from outfall
monitoring to impacts of Texaco mud and cuttings discharge.
They have ample resources in upper management levels. Kinnetic has the
boats and oceanographic equipment required, however, chemical work including
priority pollutants would go to McKesson Environmental Services. Battelle
Institute would be responsible for ,data analysis and interpretation, QA, and
scientifically credible and legally defensible results. In addition, five
consultants would cover the areas of review and interpretation of data, analysis
of variance, and histopathology.
Closer examination shows that Kinnetic/Lindstrom has one of the best physical
oceanographers and current meter plans of those responding to the RFP. They
lack depth in taxonomy and recommend a benthic procedure that does not follow
EPA guidelines. It is difficult to identify who and where the histopathological
examinations would be performed, although it is fairly clear that these
examinations would not take place locally. In addition, methods and procedures
are not addressed.
McKesson Labs have extensive experience in water samples and clean room
techniques for trace constituents. However, they lack experience with tissues
and sediments. Their QA program includes all routine practices and protocol for
their benthic identification program. In addition, they are the only respondent
employing an outside agency to perform the QA/QC audits and inter-laboratory
calibration checks.
Extremely large scale data reduction will be possible with IBM main frame
for five-year analysis. The record maintenance, data flow, verification
process, and procedures for tracking, entering, and correcting data sets are
well designed.
There is a serious lack of support for the marine biological side of the
program. They have full complex chemical and physical oceanic capabilities. -
However, they appear too concerned with planning, managerial , and consulting
activities. Considerable time is spent on qualifications of upper level person-
nel and little on persons in the field (those performing invertebrate sampling,
sorting, and identification work) .
..... ECO SYSTEMS
For the past five years ECO has been providing offshore monitoring services
at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. Previous projects include
mineral exploration, drilling, deep ocean mining, and seismic survey. They show
a capability of complete oceanographic responsibility, including qualified per-
sonnel , equipment, instruments, and boats. They indicate a close association
with subcontrctors for qualified work in chemistry and computer data management.
There is excessive time spent on data management.
However, there is a serious lack of information in the area of marine
biology. Aside from repeating the .contents of the Districts' waiver and our
RFP, there is little additional support. Although numerous statistical processes
are discussed, there is little information on the marine biology aspect
regarding subcontractors, personnel, qualifications, etc.. In fact, they make no
mention as to who would- be performing the biological work. - They recommend a
procedure that may have contamination problems and suggest the addition of a
significant number of stations and samples.
ECO Systems' water quality equipment and current meter system is good.
Regarding histopathology, Battelle Institute (Mass.) would be performing the
examinations. There-was a good description of methods; however, they are
located too far away and appeared to be unclear as to the scope of rigfishing
histo requirements.
The subcontractor selected for priority pollutants is Analytical Technologies.
Their strong point is their GC/MS scientist who has worked for the US EPA. The
laboratory is an EPA contract lab and they follow all routine pA practices.
However, they did not discuss the pA of their marine program or their micro-
biology lab.
The selected data base system is well suited for the project. There is
also a raw data error check program. The hardware and software utilized by ECO
will adequately handle the data management, analysis, and storage required by
the monitoring program.
`.W1
BROWN AND CALDWELL ,.
This firm has extensive experience in waiver application preparation,
planning and monitoring programs. Other projects have included ocean bottom
mapping, soil engineering, water quality studies, plankton surveys, receiving
water surveys, and conducting environmental monitoring by instrumentation.
Brown and Caldwell have substantial marine biological experience.
They are nearly self-contained with only one subcontractor necessary to
perform the .Districts' monitoring program. MBC Applied Environmental Sciences
would be responsible for the marine biological activities. They have extensive
experience ranging from oil pipeline surveys to environmental impact assessments.
The plan for current metering includes radio telemetry on their current
meters. This allows the collection of real time data. Their water quality
equipment is basically the same as used by other organizations. Histopathology
would be performed at Occidental College by an experimental pathologist. There
is agood description of methods which generally follows standard preparation
techniques (NOAA Guidelines) .
Regarding priority pollutants and other chemical examinations, Brown and
Caldwell have a profess-ional staff and good equipment. They have more than one -
laboratory facility which provides complete backup if required, and routinely
provides QA/QC on split samples for priority pollutant determinations. In
addition to routine practices, their QA program includes guidelines for the
calibration of their water analyzer, criteria for their marine sampling
program, and benthic identification.
Brown and Caldwell is very well equipped for data management in any form
for all phases of the monitoring program.
Brown and Caldwell is well established and very experienced in conducting
monitoring programs. They are well equipped for chemical and oceanographic
projects, and experienced in data reduction and report writing. They are
currently using major computer applications. MBC is well suited for marine
biological and taxonomic activities. Overall, there is a good balance between
managerial , oceanographic, chemical , and marine biological (taxonomic) areas.
Ij I
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO . 14 !' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
P.0.80.8129
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728 8127
100"EWE AVENUE
July 1, 1986 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 927M7018
1714154C-2810
17141982�2411
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
June 25, 1986
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: - Director Carol Kawanami
Director Phil Maurer
Don R. Griffin, Joint Chairman Director James Neal
Don Smith, Vice Joint Chairman Director Peer Swan
Richard Partin Director Charles Sylvia
Evelyn Hart
James Wahner Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Ruth Bailey Alan Watts, Rourke & Woodruff
John H. Sutton Ed Long, Mudge, Rose, Guthrie,
Sally Anne Miller Alexander and Ferdon Law Firm
Supervisor Roger Stanton Lora Stovall , Bartle Wells Associates
�./ Absent: STAFF PRESENT:
Ronald B. Hoesterey J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Buck Catlin Blake Anderson, Director of Operations
Richard B. Edgar William H. Butler, Director of Finance
William Clarke, Superintendent
CONVENE: 5:30 p.m. - Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
ADJOURN: 8:30 p.m. Gary Streed, Chief Admin. Assistant
Mike Deblieux, Personnel Administrator
1) Fiscal Policy Recommendations.
The Fiscal Policy Committee met at 4:60 p.m. immediately preceding the
Executive Committee meeting and submitted its recommendations on the following
items:
a) Ratifying Interim Placement of Excess Liability Insurance for 1986-87.
The Districts' excess liability policy (coverage of $10,975,000 at an
annual premium of $158,728) expires June 30th. Last month the Committee
reported to the Boards that because of the tenuous condition in the
insurance marketplace, our broker did not expect to receive new proposals
until shortly before that deadline.
-1-
Executive Committee Report
July 1, 1986
Because the Boards would not meet between June llth and July 9th, the
Boards authorized and directed the Committee to evaluate proposals
obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and place appropriate
excess liability insurance coverage effective July 1, 1986. The actions
taken by the Committee would be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratifi-
cation or revision at the regular meeting on July 9th. This same
authority was delegated to the Fiscal Policy Committee last year for
placement of the 1985-86 excess liability coverage because of similar
circumstances.
The Fiscal Policy Committee reported it had reviewed the enclosed (blue)
Schedule of Existing Insurance Coverage (Exhibit 1-A) and the Schedule
of Proposed Coverage Available (Exhibit 1-B Revised).
In addition to a substantial increase in premium (from $158,728 to
$430,705) as well as an increase in the deductible, the insurers had
proposed changes in the policy form to a "claims made" instead of a
"claims incurred" basis and, further, that costs of defending the claims
would be paid out of the limitations of coverage so that only the
resulting net amount would be available to satisfy judgments.
Because of the significant changes in the cost and levels of coverage
the Fiscal Policy Committee reported that it had directed the Districts'
staff and broker to extend the primary level ($975,000) of Excess
Liability insurance for two weeks from July 1, 1986 to July 15, 1986 at
a premium not to exceed $12,000 as an interim measure pending further
evaluation of liability insurance alternatives. (This option was
available because the insurer of the primary level of coverage was
agreeable to it. The insurers of the second and third levels of
excess liability coverage in the amount of $5 million each were not
willing to extend their coverage for a like period.)
The Fiscal Policy Committee further directed the staff, General Counsel
and broker to evaluate other liability insurance options, including full
self-insurance and report back to the Committee prior to the regular
Joint Board Meeting on July 9th. The Committee will evaluate the
alternatives and submit a report and recommendations to the Joint Boards
at the meeting on July 9th.
The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee actions.
b) Ratifying Placement of Excess Workers Compensation Insurance for 1986-87.
The Fiscal Policy Committee reported that the Districts' broker had
been able to secure Excess Workers Compensation Insurance Coverage for
1986-87 at a premium of $30,634, up from $13,556 for 1985-86. Although
the premium is more than doubled, it is a relatively small amount in
relation to the overall insurance program and operating budget of the
Districts.
-2-
Executive Committee Report
July 1, 1986
Following advice of the General Counsel regarding the importance of
Workers Compensation coverage due to the increasing trend of compensation
awards the Fiscal Policy Committee directed the staff to place the
statutory Excess Workers Compensation insurance coverage for 1986-87 at
a premium of $30,634 with a self-insured retention of $150,000.
The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee actions.
c) Revisions to Public Works Biddin and Award Procedures and Staff
Purchasing Authority Limits. The Fisca Policy Committee reported that
recent amendments to the California Public Contracts Code, which
established bidding procedures for public works contracts, provide
alternatives to the Districts' existing public works bidding procedures.
Staff and the General Counsel have evaluated the alternatives set forth
in this legislation, and have prepared the enclosed report (tan)
outlining the impact of adoption of these alternatives by the Districts.
Staff has also surveyed several other large wastewater management
agencies to determine their existing purchasing authority limits for
comparison with the Districts' existing limits. The results of this
survey are included in the accompanying report.
Based upon an evaluation of the recent amendments to the Public
Contracts Code and the procurement practices of the POTW'S, the Fiscal
�./ Policy Committee recommended that staff's purchasing authority be
increased to $25,000. Also enclosed for the Directors' information
are draft copies of the Districts' Purchasing Resolution (green) and
Procedures for the Selection of Engineering and Architectural Services
(yellow). These drafts include the lined-through existing wording and
the underlined proposed changes.
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation to revise the
public works bidding procedures and to increase staff purchasing
authority to $25,000.
2) Long-term debt financing program.
At the June 11th meeting of the Joint Boards, the Districts' financial and
legal consultants made a presentation to the Directors regarding implementation
of a long-term debt financing program prior to September 1, 1986. Seven of the
nine Districts have directed the consultants and staff to proceed with planning,
development and implementation of a long-term debt financing program utilizing
tax exempt certificates of participation. Director Peer Swan had recommended
that the Boards consider this type of capital financing to take advantage of
currently favorable tax laws that are proposed to be changed on September 1 by
Congress.
The seven Boards (Districts 1, 29 3, 5, 6, 7, and 14) also delegated
authority to the Fiscal Policy Committee to select an underwriter at its
June 25, 1986 meeting to work with the Districts' consultants and staff in
s./
-3-
Executive Committee Report
July 1, 1986
preparation, marketing and sale of the securities. Districts 11 and 13 elected
not to proceed with debt financing and the bond counsel has subsequently ruled
that District No. 7 is not eligible to participate at this time.
The Joint Chairman reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee, which met
immediately preceding the Executive Committee, had carried over consideration of
the matter of fixed versus variable interest rate financing and negotiated
versus competitive sale issues relative to long-term debt financing to the
Executive Committee meeting for a joint discussion. It was reported that the
Boards of Districts 2 and 3 had met on January 19th and directed the consultants
to proceed with a fixed interest rate financing package for their respective
Districts.
The Committee discussed at considerable length the relative merits of fixed
versus variable interest rates and negotiated versus competitive security sales.
[See enclosed report (light green) dated June 13, 1986 from Bartle Wells Associates
and letter (yellow) dated June 24, 1986 from Director Peer Swan of IRWD]
A fixed interest rate financing can be sold via either a competitive or a
negotiated sale. In a negotiated sale, an underwriter would be selected to work
with the Districts and our advisors to structure the issue. The selected
underwriter would then present the Districts with a bond purchase agreement
based on the deal that had been negotiated. In a competitive sale, the
Districts and our advisors structure the issue, prepare an official statement
describing the issue and the Districts, secure ratings, and actively market the
issue to a wide variety of underwriting firms. The Districts' Boards would then
adopt a notice of sale, which is the official advertisement for the issue. At a
given place and time, bids would be received from underwriters and the sale
would then be awarded to the underwriter bidding the lowest interest cost.
Variable interest rate securities can only be issued through a negotiated sale.
The Executive Committee and the Fiscal Policy Committee recommend that
those Districts electing to proceed with long-term, tax exempt debt financing
for capital construction projects, issue their certificates of participation on a
competitive sale basis. (This would preclude variable interest rate financing
and the need to select an underwriter)
It is further recommended that the following actions of the Committees be
ratified:
- Engagement of Bartle Wells Associates, municipal financing consultants,
to assist the participating Districts in development and implementation
of a long-term debt financing program, for the amount of $125,000 for
professional services, plus 150,000 for direct expenses, for a total
amount not to exceed $175,000.
- Engagement of the joint venture of Rourke & Woodruff/Mudge, Rose,
Guthrie, Alexander & Ferdon, co-bond counsel , to assist the participating
Districts in development and implementation of a long-term debt financing
program, for the amount of $100,000 for professional services, plus
$30,000 for direct expenses, for a total amount not to exceed $130,000.
-4-
Executive Committee Report
July 1, 1986
- Authorizing the staff to issue purchase orders to Moody's Investor
Services and Standard and Poor's, municipal bond rating agencies, in an
amount not to exceed $30,000 each, for evaluation and establishment of a
bond rating for the participating Districts' long-term debt financing
issues.
- Authorizing the staff to issue a purchase order contract in an amount not
to exceed $10,000 to a trustee for fiduciary and bond holder registration
services in connection with issuance of certificates of participation by
the various Districts.
The costs of the above services will be shared by the Districts electing to
participate in the sale of the securities in proportion to the amount of their
debt issue.
3) 1986-87 Individual Districts' Budget Recommendations.
The Committee reviewed the staff's preliminary 1986-87 budgets for the
individual Districts which incorporate each District's share of the Joint Works
budgets approved by the Boards on June 11th. The budgets total $312.4 million,
an increase of 24.9% over 1985-86. Approximately 11% of the budget is for
operations and 1% is for debt retirement. The balance of 78% is for construction
of master plan sewerage facilities and authorized reserves.
e.i For the coming fiscal year adequate funding is available for all Districts.
Districts Nos. 1, 5, 6, and 13 have previously adopted user fee programs. All
other Districts' operating costs will continue to be funded by ad valorem taxes.
The Committee recommends adoption of the proposed budgets for 1986-87. A
detailed transmittal is contained in the enclosed bound report. If any Director
needs additional information, please call Wayne Sylvester or Bill Butler at
(714) 540-2910.
Note: For those Districts (Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 14) considering issuance
of long-term debt financing, staff has prepared and enclosed a separate budget
document reflecting the revised budgetary amount should said Districts proceed
with such an issue. Following the actions of the respective Boards on the
matter of debt financing each Board should adopt the appropriate budget, with or
without the debt financing included.
4) Status Report on NPDES Industrial Waste Monitoring Special PCB Study.
One of the requirements of the Districts' new NPDES permit is that a special
study on the source of PCB be conducted. Staff reported to the Directors in
April and again in December of 1985 on the rather comprehensive study undertaken
by the Districts to identify and control a source of PCB's entering the system.
A study has now been completed and the staff has submitted the report to the
Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency.
-5-
Executive Committee Report
July 1, 1986
Staff reviewed the enclosed summary of the report (goldenrod) which concludes,
based upon extensive laboratory analyses by several independent laboratories,
that the Districts are in compliance with the PCB limitation in the NPDES permit
of .45 ppb. The report also concludes that the standard laboratory analytical
methods that allow for considerable discretion in techniques are contributing to
a wide variation in analytical results from laboratory to laboratory which must
be addressed by the regulatory agencies.
5) Status Report on Stringfellow Program.
a) Monthl 0 eratin Re ort. Staff briefed the Committee on the
tr ng a ow pretreatment plant operations and reviewed the enclosed
report (green) on the Stringfellow Treatment Plant Discharge Quality for
May, 1986. The plant continues to discharge its treated wastewater well
within the limits established by the Districts.
b) Lon -ran a Remedial Pro ram. The staff reported that on May 30th, the
State Department o Hea i Services issued a draft report "Stringfellow
Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study: Development and
Initial Screening of Alternatives". The purpose of the report is:
(1) To formulate alternative long-term remedial actions to prevent or
minimize migration of contamination from the Stringfellow Hazardous
Waste site; (2) to prevent or minimize the impact of the contaminates
which have already migrated from the site; (3) to screen the
alternative remedial actions for technical feasibility environmental/
public health impact and cost.
Districts' staff has reviewed the report and prepared the enclosed
summary (salmon) for the Directors.
The Executive Committee directed staff to request a special briefing for
the Boards to be conducted at an adjourned meeting in July, August, or
September.
6) Dg artment Head Salar Ran a Adjustment Pursuant to the Management
Performance Review Program MPRP .
The Joint Chairman convened the Executive Committee in closed session to
consider Department Head Salary Range Adjustments pursuant to the Management
Performance Review Program (MPRP) adopted by the Boards in 1984. Enclosed is
a separate confidential report and recommendation from the Committee.
If any Director wishes to further discuss the report or recommendation, the
Joint Chairman will adjourn the Boards into closed session at the meeting.
-6-
EXLSME INgLUWKE CJVTRAM E*Mrr 1-A
6/18/86
Proposed 0-erluctible Self- 1985-86
Type of Coverage Renewal Date Amount of Coverage Insured retention Premium remarks
MESS PUBLIC LIABILITY
A. Ehisting Coverage (1985-86)
1. Primacy Coverage July 1, 1986 $975,000 $250,000 aggregate a) $ 75,000 1984-85 policy canceled
plus $25,000 for (April 15, 1985 early necessitating
every claim to April 14, 1986) renal on April 15 vs.
regular renewal date of
July 1, 1985.
b) $ 22,553 (April 15, Carrier extended policy
1986 to June 30, for A months at higher
1986) premium to sable
consolidation of all tiers
of coverage 1986-87.
2. Elaess 0overage-1 t tier July 1, 1986 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $ 49,500
3. Ehess Coverage-2rd tier July 1, 1986 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $ 27,500
TVIAL PEOPAII4)
P1SR4ILM 1985-86 $158,728
PA)FU m CAW" AVAnAWF (EM11SED) QO®TT 1-B
6/18/86
6/24/86
revised 6/25/86
Proposed Bedctible Self- Pcaposcy/Estimeted
Type of Ooverage l4Duel Bate Mamt of Coverage Insured rete:tim 1986-87 premium Lurks
E]DOM SMUC LTABILPIY
A. Proposed Coverage (1986-87)
revised
$250,000 aggregate
plus:
1. Prinury Oouerage July 1, 1987 $950,0W-03r±ral 450,000 for every -Occurrence, policy
Liability claim $239,257
$975,000-Mmomobile 425,000 for every (estimated) -Claims made policy
claim (nay be @ 10% higher)
2. D cess Ooverage-lat tier July 1, 1907 $2,500,000 $1,000,000 $ 96,458
3. Oooess Ooera3e-2:d tier July 1, 1987 $2,500,000 $3,500,000 $ 55,000
(estimated)
4. Emess Obaera9e-3ul tier July 1, 1987 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $ 40,000 -Assumes availability
(estimated) of mirsuranee
TUIRL ESPDVM
PR9411M 1986-87 1430,705
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
M GRANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
V a.aox 8127
June 6> 1986 E WAIN VALLEY.CALIMMIA e272ea127
1� EWS AVENUE
W WAIN VALLEY,UUWPNIA 927M-Mle
9141 eW MC
U141 e622411
STAFF REPORT
Proposed Procurement Policy Revisions
Public Works Contracts
The California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission was created by
the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act of 1983. The Commission
adopted uniform construction cost accounting policies and procedures which were
subsequently submitted to the State Controller. The Commission's recommendations
were included in the 1985 amendments to the Public Contract Code.
For many years the Public Contract Code has required public works projects
(defined as labor, materials, and equipment for new construction) in an amount
greater than $5,000 to be let by the Boards by formal bidding procedures. The
above amendments provide alternatives to the contract bidding and award
procedures required for public works projects and allow for an increase in the
maximum limits for force account work.
For public agencies electing to become subject to the uniform construction cost
accounting policies and procedures the $5,000 limit is changed and the following —
bid limitations allowed:
• Projects of $15,000 or less are not defined as public works projects
and may be performed by the employees of a public agency by force
account, or by an outside firm by negotiated contract, or purchase
order.
• Public works projects between $15,000 and $50,000 may be let to
contract by informal bidding procedures.
• Public works projects of more than $50,000 shall be let to contract
by formal bidding procedures.
In order to implement these higher limits the Districts would need to take
several administrative steps as follows:
• Notify the State Controller of our decision.
• Modify the Board's Purchasing Resolution and Procedures for the
Selection of Professional Engineering and Architectural Services
policies.
• Comply with the Public Construction Cost Accounting Commission
policies and procedures.
-1-
Staff and legal counsel believe that several advantages would accrue to the
Districts by adoption of the California uniform construction cost accounting
policies and procedures. Currently small improvement jobs require a
disproportionate amount of administrative preparation and staff time for formal
bidding and Board award of a public works contract. This process, including
time to advertise and to receive bids, along with formal documentation and
supporting agenda materials, adds at least two months to the time required for
Board and Committee considerations and actions. The Districts would also be
able to take advantage of negotiated prices on a timely basis.
If the new procedures are adopted the Districts' cost accounting procedures
would be subject to review by the California Uniform Construction Cost
Accounting Commission. The Commission is made up of 14 members appointed by
the State Controller and includes representatives from the construction
industry, who have experience as general contractors and subcontractors on
public works construction projects; representatives of organized labor; and
public agency officials who are involved in letting public works construction
contracts. The Commission is charged to review the accounting procedures of
any participating public agency when an interested party contends and presents
evidence that the work undertaken by the public agency falls within any of the
following categories:'
• Is to be performed by a public agency after rejection of all bids,
claiming work can be done less expensively by the public agency.
• Has exceeded the force account limits.
• Has been improperly classified as maintenance.
However, the Districts are already subject to outside review under the existing
Public Works Code. Further, our existing cost accounting system already meets
all the requirements of the Commission. The main difference which would result
from adopting the alternative bidding procedures is that the threshold for
outside review which is now $5,000, would increase to $15,000.
Staff recommends that the Purchasing Resolution be amended to adopt the
guidelines and procedures established by the California Uniform Cost Accounting
Commission and to increase the public works contract bidding and award limits as
follows:
Projects of Procedure/Authority
Less than $15,000 Staff negotiation and
award of these non public
work projects or force
account pursuant to
Board Policy
Between $15 - 25,000 Staff award after formal
bidding pursuant to
Board Policy
More than $25,000 Board award after formal
bidding pursuant to
Board Policy
-2-
Non Public Works Purchases
The current procurement policy of the Joint Boards provides staff authority to
make purchases up to $10,000, subject to prescribed procedures set forth in the
Purchasing Resolution, and requires specific Board authorization for purchases
greater than $10,000. Certain exceptions to the $10,000 threshold are allowed
for in emergencies, a changing marketplace, recurring purchases over the fiscal
year, and previously approved negotiated contracts.
As a part of our evaluation of the California Uniform Cost Accounting Code,
staff has reviewed the purchasing authority at other major POTW's in the state
and found the following:
Staff Procurement
PON Authority Limit
Orange County Sanitation Districts $10,000
Los Angeles County Sanitation 25,000
City of Los Angeles (Sanitation) 20,000
City of San Diego (Sanitation) 25,000
Ventura Regional Sanitation 20,000
East Bay Municipal Utility District 20,000
Irvine Ranch Water District 20,000
Staff recommends that its authority to make non public works purchases be
increased to $25,000.
Procedures for Selection of Professional Engineers and Architectural Services
The selection of consulting engineers and architects is governed by a separate
Board policy. The current policy provides for an extensive and formal Board
Selection Committee process for services over $10,000 and allows the staff the
same authority as in the Purchasing Resolution to procure such services up to
$10,000.
In order to maintain the relationship between the purchasing policy and the
policy for selection of engineers and architects which provides uniformity and
ease of administration, staff recommends that its limit for procurement of such
services also be increased to $25,000.
Summary
To assist the Directors we have attached a summary outlining the major provisions
of staff's recommendations and the changes from the existing procurement policies.
-3-
5/20/86
SUMMMY OF PURCHASING RESOLUTION
CHANGE FROM
ITEMS PROPOSED NEW RESOLUTION CURRENT RES01-9-10N
PUBLIC WORKS Staff Authority up to S25,DOO
Tffefme as- labor,
materials and - Negotiated award or force account if Was $5,000
equipment for less than S15,000. Now not defined as
new construction, public works projects
exceeding S15,000)
- Formal bidding procedures between Was S5,000
$15,000 and S25,000
Board Must Award if greater than $25,000
- Formal bidding and Board Award if Was S5,G00
greater than S25,D00
SERVICES SUPPLIES & Staff Authority up to S25,D00
UIP N
(Mon u5T� Works) - Discretionary, no quotes required for No Change
purchases up to $1,000
- Solicit 3 quotes minimum for purchases Was S1,000-S10,000
between $1,000 and $25,000-
Board Must Award if greater than $25,000 -
- Requires advertising and sealed bids Was S10,000
for purchases over $25,000
Exceptions:
- Ember enc�ies: Staff may procure and No Change
adv si a appropriate Chairman
Board ratification required
- Advantageous Marketplace No Change
Sta may p ram
- To avoid imminent price increase
- If item might not be available at
such time as purchasing procedures
could be completed.
Board ratification required
- Blanket Orders: Staff may issue Was $10,000
an eLT t� to effect more
efficient procurement of recurring
purchases from the same vendor
that may aggregate more than
$25,000 over budget year.
- NXe otiateosgntracts: Board may Was $10,000
author zi a staff to negotiate and
award contracts greater than
$25,000 with concurrence of _
appropriate Chairman.
ENGINEERING AND Staff Authority up to $25,000 Was $10,000
ARCHITRC U L SERVICE
- Requires approved scope of work No Change
- Consider at least three qualified firms No Change
- Staff negotiates No Change
Board Must Award if greater than $25,000 Was $10,000
- Requires approved scope of work No Change
- Requires public notice No Change
- Selection Committee negotiates No Change
RESOLUTION NO. 81-24 DRAFT 6/26/86
PURCHASING RESOLUTION
v A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, 4*
13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A
PURCHASING SYSTEM AND POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING
PURCHASES OF SUPPLIES, SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT, AND
REPEALING RESOLUTION NOS. '" 98, '" 99, 9; 81-24
AND 82-34
WHEREAS, Section 54202, Government Code, State of California, requires that
every local agency shall adopt policies and procedures, including bidding
regulations, governing purchases of supplies, services and equipment and that
purchases of supplies, services and equipment by the local agency shall be in
accordance with said duly adopted policies; and -
WHEREAS, Section 54204, Government Code, State of California, requires that
if the local agency is other than a city, county or city and county, policies
provided for in Section 54202 of said Code shall be adopted by means of a
v written rule or regulation, copies of which shall be available for public
distribution; and
WHEREAS, in order to establish efficient procedures for the purchase of
supplies, services and equipment and the letting of public works contracts at
the best possible cost commensurate with quality and delivery needs, together
with other relevant factors, to exercise positive financial control over
purchases, to clearly define authority for the purchasing function and to
establish bidding procedures, a purchasing system for the Districts and the
Joint Administrative Organization, hereinafter referred to as "Districts",
beyond what is required by said sections of the Government Code is desirable and
in the best public interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Boards or Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
`..� California,
-1-
DO HEREBY DETERMINE, AND ORDER AND RESOLVE THAT:
Section 1: System Adoption. In order to establish efficient procedures
for the purchase of supplies, services and equipment and the letting of public
works contracts at the best possible cost commensurate with quality and delivery
needs and other relevant factors, to exercise positive financial control over
purchases, to clearly define authority for the purchasing function, to establish
bidding procedures and in pursuance of Section 54202 of the Government Code of
the State of California, a purchasing system is hereby adopted.
Section 2: Purchasing Division - Director of Finance Authority. There is
hereby vested inthe purchasing division (hereinafter referred to as
"Purchasing"), under the general supervision and direction of the Director of
Finance, the authority for the purchase of supplies, services and equipment,
letting of public works contracts and establishment of. rules, procedures and
administrative policies relative thereto. The Director of Finance may delegate
or assign any or all of the following duties to members of his staff:
(a) Purchase or contract for supplies, services and equipment required by
any using department or division, in accordance with purchasing procedures
prescribed by this Resolution, such administrative regulations as purchasing
shall adopt for the internal management and operation of purchasing and such
other rules and regulations as shall be prescribed by the Board of Directors.
(b) Negotiate and recommend execution of contracts for the purchase of
supplies, services and equipment and for public works or for the sale of surplus
property and by-products of the sewage treatment process.
(c) Prepare all contracts and appurtenant documents which shall be
delivered to the Boards' Secretary for custodianship.
(d) Act to prepare for the Districts the needed quality in supplies,
services, equipment and construction at the best cost and under the most
favorable conditions with due consideration to delivery and other relevant
factors.
-2-
(e) Discourage uniform bidding and endeavor to obtain as full and open
competition as possible on all purchases and sales.
(f) Prepare rules, regulations, procedures and administrative policies,
and revisions thereto, governing the purchase of supplies, services and
equipment and for the letting of public works contracts and sales of surplus
property and by-products.
(g) Prepare rules, regulations, procedures and administrative policies,
and revisions thereto, governing the warehousing of inventories.
(h) Keep informed of current development in the field of purchasing,
prices, market conditions and new products.
(i) Prescribe and maintain such forms as reasonably necessary to the
operation of this Resolution and other rules and regulations.
(J) Develop specifications to establish minimum standards for all
purchases.
(k) Supervise the inspection of all supplies, services and equipment
.�
purchases to insure conformance with specifications. —
(1) Provide for transfer of surplus or unused supplies and equipment
between departments as needed.
(m) Have custodianship and control of all inventories and surplus
property.
(n) Maintain a bidders' list, vendors' catalog file, and records needed
for efficient operation of the purchasing division.
(o) Such other and future duties as, in the Director's discretion, are
incidental and necessary to the conduct of the division.
Section 4: Requisitions. All employees of the Districts who need or
require supplies, services and equipment to carry out the defined duties of
their positions, shall submit requisitions for purchases or warehouse
requisitions to Purchasing on standard requisition forms. -
-3-
x .
Section 5: Bidding - Public Works. When the expenditure required for a
public works project exceeds , Fifteen Thousand
($15,000.00) Dollars, it shall be contracted for and let to the lowest v
responsible bidder, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code
Sections 4100 et sec ., "__,.h and Safety G_._ SeeMens 4756 and Resolution
No. 86- whereby Districts elected to become subject to uniform construction
cost accounting procedures set forth in Public Contract Code Sections, 21100
et seq., as provided in the following Sections.
Section 6: Bidding - Nonpublic Works Purchases. Except as hereinafter _
provided, purchasing of supplies, services or equipment other than public works
shall be by bid procedures when purchases and contracts for supplies, services
or equipment are estimated to have values greater than
Twenty Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars, and the commodities or services may
be obtained from more than one vendor, are not standardized as to price, and no
emergency exists.
Section 7: Emergencies. Whenever a grave emergency arises which is, or �—
may be a threat to the continued operation of the sewage facilities, support
facilities and/or administrative facilities operated by the Districts, or when
purchases are immediately necessary for the preservation of life or property or
to avoid a threat to the public health. or safety, purchasing may purchase
supplies, services or equipment required for immediate use, in an amount greater
than Twenty Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars without
observing the procedures set forth in this resolution. In such event,
Purchasing shall advise the District Chairman and/or Chairman Pro Tem, or the
Joint Chairman and/or Vice Joint Chairman, as appropriate, of the action taken,
and such action shall be ratified by the Board of Directors at its next regular
meeting.
-4-
Section 8: Standardized Prices and Specialized Services. In purchases of
supplies, services or equipment in which the items to be purchased have a
demonstrated uniformity in price, or it is determined that there is a sole
source or the provider of services is determined to be uniquely qualified to
perform specialized services, Purchasing may make such purchases without
observing the procedures of Section 15 below.
Section 9: Purchase Orders. Purchase of all supplies, services or
equipment shall be made by purchase order signed by the Director of Finance or
his designee. Purchasing and employees requisitioning supplies and equipment
shall be responsible that orders and requisitions are in conformity with the
spirit and intent of this resolution and that no purchase has been broken into
smaller units to evade any requirement of this resolution. Purchasing shall
retain, in its files, one copy of all purchase orders issued during two years
preceding, on which copy of the purchase order, there shall be a list of bidders
and prices bid for the material or equipment purchased, or if no bids or
`..✓
quotations were taken or received, a full statement as to the reasons therefor.
A record of all sales of surplus property and by-products shall also be
maintained by purchasing upon or in which is maintained the record of the bids
received for the property or by-products sold, or if bids were not taken or
received, a full explanation thereof. Such records shall be maintained for two
(2) years after the sale.
Section 10: Formal Contract Procedures. Except as otherwise provided
herein, purchases and contracts for supplies, services or equipment and for
public works, of estimated values greater than Ten Thousand "'^,^^^ 00)
Twenty-Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars, shall be by written contract or
purchase order agreement with the lowest responsible bidder, awarded by the
Board of Directors, pursuant to the procedure prescribed herein.
-5-
Section 11: Encumbrances of Funds. Except in cases of emergency, no
purchase order shall be issued for any supplies, services or equipment unless
there exists an unencumbered appropriation balance in the fund against which v
said purchase is to be charged.
Section 12: Public Works Contract Defined. Public works contracts are
herein defined as contracts with duly licensed contractors of the State of
California for the furnishing of labor and materials and equipment for the
construction of sewage facilities and appurtenant buildings and the structures
necessary to the operation of the Districts in an amount greater than five
Fifteen Thousand ($15,000.00) Dollars as per Public
Contract Code Sections 21100 et seq.
Section 13: Bidding Procedure - Public Works Construction Greater
than •$15,000. Procedures for soliciting bids and awarding contracts for public
works eentraets projects for more than Fifteen
Thousand ($15,000.00) Dollars, shall be by written contract with the lowest
responsible bidder, pursuant to the procedures prescribed herein and in
accordance with Sections ^"` ef the Health and Safety 21207 and 21208 of
the Public Contract Code of the State of California.
(a) Notice Inviting Bids. Notices inviting bids shall #aelude-a--general
deseripVen of distinctly describe the work to be performed, shall state where
bid blanks and specifications may be secured, and the time and place for
receiving and opening sealed bids.
(1) Published Notice. Notice inviting bids shall set a date for the
opening of bids. The first publication or posting of the notice shall be
at least fourteen (14) ten-(19) calendar days before the date for the opening
of the bids. Notice shall be published at least two (2) times, not less than
five (5) days apart, in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and
U
-6-
published in the Districts, or if there is nene, it shall he posted in at
(2) Nailed Notice. Unless the work to be done is proprietary, notices
inviting bids shall be mailed to all contractors on the Districts' list
for the category of work being bid and/all trade journals specified for Orange
County by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission no less
than 30 calendar days before the date of opening of bids.
(3) Bidders List. Purchasing may also solicit sealed bids from all
qualified responsible prospective suppliers whose names are on a Bidders
List that may be maintained by Districts.
(b) Bidder's Security. When deemed necessary by Purchasing, bidder's
security may be prescribed in the contract specifications and in the public
notices inviting bids. Bidders shall be entitled to return of bid security,
upon award of a contract by the Districts, provided that a successful bidder
shall forfeit his bid security upon refusal or failure to execute the contract
within the prescribed time after the notice of award of contract has been
mailed, unless the Districts are responsible for the delay. The Board of
Directors may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the
contract, award it to the next lowest responsible bidder. If the Board of
Directors awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the
lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the Districts to the difference
between the low bid and the second low bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be ,
returned to the lowest bidder.
(c) Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the Director
of Finance and Secretary of the Boards of Directors and shall be identified as
bids on the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public by the Director of Finance
-7-
or his designated designee representative at the time and place stated in the
public notices. A tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public
inspection during regular business hours for a period of not less than thirty v
(30) calendar days after the bid opening.
(d) Refection of Bids. In its discretion, the Board of Directors may
reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If after the
opening of bids all bids are rejected, the Board of Directors, on a resolution
adopted by a four-fifths (4/5) vote, may declare that the work can be performed
more economically by day labor, or the materials or supplies furnished at a
lower price in the open market and may have the work done in a manner stated in
the Resolution in order to take advantage of this lower cost. ,f there is
flood, stepm or other disastep, the Distr4et Beard may. by resolution adapted by
immed4ate expenditure of publie money to safeguard life, health or
,
(e) Tie Bids. If two or more bids received are for the same total amount
or unit price, quality and service being equal and if the public interest will
not permit the delay or readvertising for bids, the Board of Directors may
accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the
tie bidders at the time of the bid opening. if -- Lid- are ----ived, the
(f) No Bids. If no bids are received, the Districts may have the work
done by force account, may readverttse for bids pursuant the procedures herein,
or may select a contractor by negotiation.
-8-
(g) Emgergencies. Whenever a grave emergency arises which is, or may be,
a threat to the continued operation of the sewage facilities, support facilities
and/or administrative facilities operated by the Districts, the Districts,
General Manager may declare a public emergency and proceed to replace or repair
any public facility without observing the procedures set forth in this
Resolution. In such event, the General Manager shall advise the District Chairman
and/or Chairman Pro Tem, or the Joint Chairman and/or Vice Chairman, as
appropriate, of the action taken, and such action shall be confirmed by a
four/fifths (4/5th) vote of the Board of Directors at its next regular meeting.
(h) Performance Bonds. Purchasing shall have authority to require a
performance bond before entering a contract in such amount up to one hundred
(100%) percent of the amount of the contract, as it shall find reasonably
necessary to protect the best interests of the Districts. If Purchasing requires
a performance bond, the form and amount of the bond shall be described in the
notice inviting bids, or in the contract specifications.
(i) Cost Records. Cost records shall be kept in the manner provided in
Sections 4000 to 4007, inclusive, of the Government Code, State of California.
Section 14: Bidding Procedure - Non Public Work Construction - Purchases
and Sales Greater than $10,-000.00 $25,000.60. Except as otherwise provided
herein, purchases of supplies, equipment and services and the sale of personal
property of estimated value greater than Twenty Five
Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars shall be by written contract or purchase order
agreement with the lowest responsible bidder, pursuant to the procedures
prescribed herein.
(a) Notice Inviting Bids. Notices inviting bids shall include a general
description of the articles or services to be purchased or sold, shall state
where bid blanks and specifications may be secured, and the time and place for
opening bids.
-9-
(1) Published Notice. Notice inviting bids shall set a date for the
opening of bids. The notice shall be published one (1) time at least ten
(10) days before the date for the opening of the bids. Notice shall be v
published in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in
the Districts, or if there is none, it shall be posted in at least those
public places in the Districts that have been designated for posting such
notices. This notice shall distinctly describe the articles or services to
be purchased or sold.
(2) Bidders List. Purchasing may also solicit sealed bids from all
qualified, responsible prospective suppliers whose names are on the Bidders
List maintained by the Districts, or who have requested their names to be
added thereto. -
(3) Bulletin Board. Purchasing shall also advertise pending
purchases or sales by a notice posted on a public bulletin board in the
purchasing division office.
(b) Bidder's Security. When deemed necessary by Purchasing, bidder's
security may be prescribed in the contract specifications or in the public
notices inviting bids. Bidders shall be entitled to return of bid security
upon the award of a contract or issuance of a purchase order, provided that a
successful bidder shall forfeit his bid security upon refusal or failure to
execute the contract within the prescribed time after the notice of award of
contract has been mailed, unless the Districts are responsible for the delay.
The Board of Directors may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to
execute the contract, award it to the next lowest responsible bidder. If the
Board of Directors awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of
the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the Districts to the difference
between the low bid and the second low bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be
returned to the lowest bidder.
-10-
(c) Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the Director
of Finance and Secretary of the Boards of Directors, and shall be identified as
bids on the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public by the Director of Finance
or his designated representative at the time and place stated in the public
notices. A tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection
during regular business hours for a period of not less than thirty (30) calendar
days after the bid opening.
(d) Rejection of Bids. In its discretion, the Board of Directors may
reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If all bids are
rejected, the Board of Directors, by majority vote, may declare that the
materials or supplies may be acquired at a lower cost by negotiation in the
open market and authorize the purchase in that manner.
(e) Award of Contracts. A contract or purchase order agreement shall be
awarded by the Board of Directors to the lowest responsible bidder except as
otherwise provided herein.
(f) Tie Bids. If two or more bids received are for the same total amount or unit price, quality and service being equal and if the public interest will
not permit the delay of readvertising for bids, the Board of Directors may
accept the one it chooses or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the
tie bidders at the time of the bid opening.
(g) Performance Bonds. Purchasing shall have authority to require a
performance bond before entering a contract in such amount as it shall find
reasonably necessary to protect the best interest of the Districts. If
Purchasing requires a performance bond, the form and amount of the bond shall be
described in the notice inviting bids and in the contract specifications.
(h) Exception. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) through
(g) above, purchasing may award a contract to purchase supplies, equipment or
-11-
services in an amount greater than Twenty Five
Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars without obtaining bids and following the
procedures set forth above when Purchasing determines that:
(1) By purchasing immediately, it can avoid an imminent-price
increase or realize a substantial price discount that is available on a
short term basis only, or
(2) It can obtain equipment or supplies immediately that might not
otherwise be available at such time as purchasing procedures could be
completed.
All such purchases shall be ratified by the Board of Directors at its next
regular meeting.
Section 15: Open Market Procedure - Non Public Works Construction re
Purchases and Sales Less than $25,000. Purchases of supplies, equipment and
services, and the sale of surplus District personal property of an estimated
value in the amount of Twenty Five Thousand
($25,000.00) Dollars or less on which bidding is not required by State law, may �—
be made by Purchasing in the open market without observing the procedures
prescribed by Section 14 above. The procedures to be used for these purchases
are as follows:
(a) Minimum Number of Bids. Open market purchases shall, wherever
possible, be based on at least three (3) bids and shall be awarded to the lowest
responsible bidder.
(b) Notice Inviting Bids. Bids shall be solicited by written requests to
prospective vendors or purchasers and/or by telephone, and/or by public notice
posted on a public bulletin board in the purchasing division offices.
(c) Receipt of Bids. Bids shall be submitted to Purchasing who shall keep
a public record of all open market orders and bids for a period bf 'one (1) year
after the submission of bids or the placing of orders.
-12-
(d) Purchases Less than $1,000.00. Purchasing may purchase supplies,
equipment and services of an estimated value in the amount of One Thousand
($1,000.00) Dollars or less without observing the procedures prescribed in this
Section when, in its discretion, it is determined that observing such procedures
would not result in a lower overall cost to the Districts.
Section 16: Blanket Purchase Orders. Purchasing may issue annual blanket
purchase orders for recurring purchases of miscellaneous supplies that, because
of economic considerations are not carried in stores stock in the Districts'
warehouse, and for miscellaneous services, where such purchases of supplies and
services in the aggregate will exceed an estimated value of Ten-Thousand•
($10,000.00) Twenty Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars from a single vendor
during the budget year, without observing the procedures prescribed in Section
14 when, in its discretion, it is determined that such blanket purchase orders
are at a cost favorable to the Districts and will result in more efficient
procurement of such items. Blanket purchase orders shall be in conformity with
the spirit and intent of this resolution. Purchasing shall , at the beginning of
each budget year, file a list of such purchase orders and the estimated annual
amount with the Director of Finance.
Section 17: Inspection and Testing. The supplies and equipment delivered,
and contractual services performed, shall be inspected to determine their
conformance with the specifications set forth in the purchase order or contract.
Purchasing shall have authority to request professional service, or to require
chemical and physical tests of samples submitted with bids and samples of
deliveries which are necessary to determine their quality and conformance with
specifications.
Section 18: Negotiated Contracts - Non Public Works Construction.
Notwithstanding the other provisions of this resolution, the Board of Directors
may, when it appears in the best interests of the Districts, authorize the Staff
to negotiate and award a contract for purchase of supplies, equipment or
-13-
services without observing the procedures prescribed in Sections 14 and 15 above.
- (a) When such authorization has been granted for purchase of supplies,
equipment or services of an estimated value in the amount of Tea Theesand
4$10;000:00) Twenty Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars or greater, the staff
shall obtain the concurrence of the District Chairman and/or Chairman Pro Tem,
or the Joint Chairman and/or vice Joint Chairman, as appropriate, prior to
awarding such purchase.
(b) Whenever any contract for supplies, equipment or services has been
entered into between the Districts and a person or entity providing such
supplies, equipment or services, and Purchasing determines that it is in the
best interest of the Districts to continue said contract with such person or
entity, Purchasing may, in its discretion, negotiate an extension of such
contract without observing the procedures prescribed in Sections 14 and 15
above, provided the amount of the extension does not exceed TeR Thousand
{410,000.00) Twenty Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars. In the event the
extension is in an amount greater than Twenty Five `.,✓
Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars, it shall be approved and awarded by the Board of
Directors. This Section shall not apply to the letting of public works
construction contracts in excess of Fifteen Thousand
($15,000.00) Dollars.
Section 19: Surplus Supplies and Equipment. All, departments and/or
divisions shall submit to Purchasing, at such times and in such form as it
shall prescribe, reports showing all supplies and/or equipment which are no
longer used or which have become obsolete or worn out. Purchasing shall have
authority, pursuant to provisions of this Resolution, to sell or exchange for or
trade in on new supplies and equipment all supplies and equipment which cannot
be used by any other department or division, or which have become unsuitable for
Districts' use.
-14-
Section 20: Sale of Real Property. No real property of the Districts may
be sold or any negotiations leading to such sale may be made without prior
`�✓ approval of the Board of Directors.
Section 21: Cooperative Procurement.
(a) The Districts, through Purchasing, may participate in or sponsor,
conduct and/or administer a cooperative procurement agreement for the
acquisition of procured items with any other public agency purchasing unit, in
accordance with an agreement between Districts and the other public agency.
(b) The Districts, through Purchasing, may sell to, acquire from, or use
any property belonging to another public agency, including .the cooperative use
of supplies or services.
Section 22: Professional Services Agreement. All contracts for the
retention of architectural and engineering services shall be governed by the
Policy of the Board of Directors Establishing Procedures for the Selection of
Professional Engineering and Architectural Services, dated April 14, 1982, as
amended.
Section 23: Noncompliance. Any transaction failing to comply with this
Resolution in any respect is voidable in the discretion of the Board of
Directors and any employee willfully and knowingly violating any provision of
this Resolution may be subject to disciplinary action.
Section 24: Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution is for any reason held to be
unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the
validity of the entire resolution or any of the remaining portions thereof. The
Board of Directors hereby declares that it would have passed this Resolution and
each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause and phrase thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
subdivisions, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or
..�
otherwise invalid. '
-15-
Section 25: Repeal of Conflicts. Resel t4--- and '^ "'
Resolutions No. 81-24 and 82-34 and all prior resolutions or motions or portions
thereof in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect.
Section 26: Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect an
january 5, 1981- immediately upon adoption by the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February '',1991
v
-16-
DRAFT
6/13/86
A POLICY OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NO. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 5 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION OF PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
• • • • • • • • • •
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 1,
2 , 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY ESTABLISH THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES FOR THE
SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES:
Section 1. Selection of Engineering and Architectural Firms.
In the selection of a consulting architect, engineer a d or
other related services as defined in Section 2, it is recognized
that no two individuals or firms have equal training, experience,
skill, capabilities or work loads to meet the demands of any
contemplated project. Evaluation and selection of a consultant
will include but not be limited to the following:
�./ A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional
standing, its members being of good moral
character, and it shall be prepared to submit
references from persons of known repute.
B. The principal and other responsible members of the
firm must be registered in the State of California.
C. A principal member of the firm' s staff must have at
least ten years' recent experience in responsible
charge of work of the type involved in the project.
D. At least two additional members of the firm' s staff
must have at least five years' experience in
responsible charge in the field, or fields,
required by the project.
E. The firm shall be capable of performing the work
within the prescribed time limitations considering
the current and planned work loads of the firm.
F. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be
given to a local firm when more than one firm is
being considered.
G. A firm selected _here the ___- _ _ _ fees are great__
then $19 ,900 must certify a to having an affirmative
action program.
-1-
r •,
Section 2. Definition of Engineering/Architectural Services.
A. Engineering or architectural services are those
professional services associated with research,
development, design and construction, alteration,
or repair of real property, as well as incidental
services that members of these professions and
those in their employ may logically or justifiably
perform, including studies, investigations,
surveys, evaluations, consultations, planning,
programming, conceptual designs, plans and
specifications, cost estimates, inspections, shop
drawing reviews, sample recommendations,
preparation of operation and maintenance manuals,
and other related services. Services for product
testing and surveying are excluded.
B. Services covered hereunder include architectural,
engineering, environmental and related services.
C. An Engineer/Architect is an individual, partnership
or corporation (or any combination thereof) engaged
to provide services as defined in Section 2 .A.
Section 3. Scope of the Proiect.
A. For every project approved by the Board(s) and for
which outside services are required, the staff shall
develop a comprehensive scope of work.
B. The scope shall define the extent of the services, �-
the time required, and shall develop a maximum fee
for the services sought.
C. The maximum fee amount shall be kept confidential
until a selection has been made, but, along with
the scope of work, will be available to any Director
upon request.
Section 4. Selection of Firm.
A. Projects where services are less than $10,990 . $25,000.
1 . Projects where the maximum professional
fees are less than $19,-999 $25,000 are usually
specific, small projects normally
requiring specialization in one or two
fields of endeavor.
2 . Staff shall consider at least three
qualified firms and shall select that
firm which appears best qualified for the
project.
-2-
3 . Notwithstanding the provisions of Section
4 .A.2, in the event the proposed work is
considered continuation or specialized
services as described in Section 5,
"Continuation of Services, " or Section 6,
"Specialized Services," upon written
authorization by the General Manager,
negotiations may be limited to the sole
firm deemed desirable for providing said
services.
4 . Negotiations for compensation for the
work shall be conducted between the
firm and staff members appointed by
the General Manager, or their designees.
5 . A requisition for acquisition of services
shall be forwarded to the purchasing
office listing the firms considered,
the reasons for choosing the firm
selected and shall certify that the
negotiated fee for compensation to the
firm is reasonable for the services
requested and will not result in excess
profits for the firm.
6 . The purchasing office shall process the
requisition in accordance with the
purchasing policy established by the
Boards of Directors.
1./ -
7. The evaluation of the firm's qualifications
and the fee negotiations will not be made
public but will be available to any Director
upon request.
8 . In cases where the aggregate amount of
services is expected to exceed $10 ,000 and
a project may be funded through a Federal
grant program, all applicable provisions
of 40CFR 35.137 shall apply to the
solicitation o210,2osals and negotiations
for engineeringf architectural service.
B. Projects where services are greater than $18,90G . $25 ,000.
1. Public Notice.
a. *r e&eg5ate Appropriate public notice shall be
given by publication of a notice of
request for prepesals qualifications in professional
journals or publications of general
circulation.
-3-
b. The notice shall request written
statements of qualification only.
C. ft amen As an alternative to the
notice by publication, the District
shall maintain a list of qualified
.firms and notice of the request for
pregesais qualifications shall be
mailed to those firms who have the
capabilities and specialization to
qualify for the project.
2. Screening Committee.
A Screening Committee comprised of a minimum of
three staff members designated by the General
Manager shall select at least three firms who
appear best qualified for the project.
3 . Proposals.
a. Staff will prepare written requests
for proposals setting forth the scope
of work and other information necessary
for the firm to properly prepare and
submit a proposal. Proposals shall
be solicited from the three firms
deemed most qualified.
b. Proposals submitted shall:
(1) Acknowledge the scope of the
project and the extent of the
services required.
(2) Include a statement of the
firm's qualifications for
performing the proposed work.
(3) Include past performance
records of the firm.
(4) Demonstrate the firm' s capabili-
ties to complete the work within
the time allotted.
(5) Identify the specific key person-
nel to be assigned to the project. _
(6) Contain a conflict of interest
disclaimer.
(7) Provide any other information
required to properly evaluate
the firm's qualifications and
familiarity with the types of
problems applicable to the
project.
-4-
4. Selection Committee.
a. Joint Works.
(1) The Selection Committee for
Boards of Directors and a minimum
of twe one staff members appointed
by the General Manager, or their
designees.
(2) At the discretion of the Joint
Chairman, additional Directors may
be appointed to the Committee to
assist in the consideration of
proposals for specific projects .
b. Individual Districts.
(1) Districts with three-member
Boards: The Selection Committee
of a District with a three-member
Board shall be comprised of the
Chairman of the District and a
minimum of two one staff members
appointed by the General
Manager, or their designees.
(2) Districts with more than a three-
member Board: The Selection
Committee of a District with
�.s more than a three-member Board -
shall be comprised of the
Chairman and Chairman pro tem
of the District and a minimum
of twe one staff members appointed
by the General Manager, or their
designees.
5 . Negotiations .
a. The Selection Committee shall review
qualifications of each firm with due
consideration of location, reputation,
experience, financial standing, size,
personnel availability, quality of
references, estimated fee for services
to be performed and work load and other
factors relevant to the project being
considered.
b. The Selection Committee, upon comple-
tion of their evaluation, shall rank
the firms considered in order of
desirability.
-5-
C. To determine the firm to be selected and the compensation
for the services sought, the following will be strictly
adhered to:
1. The Selection Committee will, at its
discretion, invite the firm that is
considered to be the best qualified to
appear before the Seleetien Committee.
2. The firm shall present, in writing, to the
Selection Committee, a proposal for fees
associated with the services. The proposal
for compensation shall be presented in
sufficient detail to enable the Selection
Committee to adequately ascertain the level
of effort associated with the scope of work
and to determine whether the firm has
thoroughly identified the efforts associated
with the services and thoroughly understands
the work required. -
3. The basis of the fee shall be: Cost plus a
fixed fee with a maximum amount, a per diem
rate(s) with a maximum amount, or a lump sum
(fixed) fee.
4. If it is the decision of the Selection
Committee to use methods for compensation .
other than the lump sum or cost plus a
fixed fee with a maximum, or the per diem
rates with a maximum, justifications for �-
this decision shall be made by the Selection
Committee in their recommendation to the
Board(s) of Directors for the services.
5. The Selection Committee shall review the
compensation requested by the firm which
shall be compared with the maximum fee as
previously established.
6. The final negotiated fee, as recommended
to the Board(s) of Directors, shall be
certified by the Selection Committee as
reasonable for the services requested
and not resulting in excessive profits
for the firm.
7. If agreement is not reached, the nego-
tiations should be terminated and similar
interviews should then follow with the
next-ranked firm.
-6-
8 . All such negotiations shall be on a
strictly confidential basis and in no
case shall the compensation discussed
with one firm be discussed with another.
Section 5. Continuation of Services.
A. In some instances where a firm has satisfactorily
completed one phase in the development of a project
and the Board(s) determine that it is in the best
interests of the District(s) to retain the same
firm for subsequent phases of related work, the
Selection Committee may be authorized to proceed
directly with negotiations with that firm for
the additional work.
B. This situation may arise when a firm has completed
a feasibility report or a master plan report and
the services for said work are satisfactory to
the Board(s) and the procedure of examining other
firms for subsequent phases is not deemed necessary.
C. In the event that satisfactory negotiations for
price cannot be concluded under these circumstances,
negotiations should be terminated and the provisions
set forth hereinabove for selection of a firm would
apply.
Section 6. Specialized Services.
�./
A. In the event that specialized services are required
where it is determined that only one firm can best
perform the services for a specific project, the
Selection Committee, in the case where the fees
are greater than $10,098 , 25 000 will report to the Board(s)
said findings and request authority to negotiate
directly with the particular specialized firm.
B. The basis of selection of the specialized firm or
individual, along with the negotiated fee, shall
be presented to the Board(s) of Directors for
consideration.
Section 7. Agreement for Services.
A. Upon approval by the Board(s) of a negotiated
agreement for services, a contract shall be exe-
cuted in a form approved by the General Counsel .
B. The contract shall include:
1. A statement of the scope of the project.
2 . The basis and individual elements of the
fees .
3 . The basis for payment to the firm.
-7-
4 . The time limits in which the services must
be performed. 1
5 . Provisions for fee adjustments should there
be changes in the scope of work. .�.
6 . If it is determined by the Selection
Committee that the Districts may be caused
to incur a penalty or liability, or suffer
a loss because of the failure of the firm
to perform the work within specified time
limits, the contract shall include a clause
setting forth penalties for such non-
performance or delayed performance, in
amounts to be determined by the Committee.
7 . For projects exceeding $25,000 in fees,
the firm may, if determined appropriate by
the Selection Committee based on the nature
and size of the project, be required to carry
errors and omissions insurance coverage in
an amount determined by the Selection Committee
to be adequate for the project.
8 . Any other provisions deemed necessary or
desirable.
C. Progress payments made to the firm during the time
the services are being supplied shall be on the work
completed to date, as recommended by the responsible
staff member.
Section 8 . Conflict of Interest.
A. The District(s) maintain a Conflict of Interest Code
which governs the performance of its officers , employees
or agents in the conduct of project work, including
procurement.
B. No officer, employee or agent shall solicit or accept
gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from
potential candidates.
C. Any firm seeking selection under these procedures that
violates the District(s) Conflict of Interest Code shall
be automatically disqualified.
Section 9. Effective Dates and Revision Procedure.
A. This policy shall become effective on C.__-.�-,-- r1-,- 1983 .
B. The policy may be modified from time to time as
necessary to best meet the needs of the District(s) .
�.s
-8-
i y Bartle Wells Associates
' Municipal Financing Consultants
j 1636 Bush Street
l San Francisco 94109
415 775-3113 L15-C
June 13, 1986
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
PO Box 8127
Fountain Valley CA 92728
Attention: Bill Butler
Subject: Fixed- vs. Variable-Rate Financing
Traditionally, tax-exempt bonds have been issued with fixed interest
rates. The rates of interest on the bonds are established when the
issue is sold, and remain in effect as long as the bonds are outstanding.
Within the past several years, bonds have begun to be issued with
variable interest rates. Variable-rate bonds combine some of the
characteristics of long-term bonds and some of short-term bonds.
Because of their structure, they bear interest at short-term rather
than long-term rates.
This letter describes the structure of variable-rate tax-exempt financing
and outlines some of its advantages and disadvantages compared to
fixed-rate debt.
Variable-rate bonds have nominal long-term maturity, frequently 30
years, and may have serial maturities at annual intervals. The interest
rate on the bonds is reset at specified short-term intervals, and each
time the rate changes the holders can sell them back ("put" them) to
the underwriter (called the remarketing agent) at par. The remarketing
agent resells them to new purchasers. From the standpoint of the
issuer, the bonds are very similar to long-term bonds so long as they
can be successfully remarketed. From the standpoint of the purchasers, _
the bonds are short-term obligations because the repurchase of the
bonds at par at short-term intervals is guaranteed.
The interest rate on a variable-rate bond may change daily, weekly,
monthly, semiannually, or annually. The interest rate for each interval
is set by the issuer's remarketing agent.
A variable-rate bond issue needs liquidity to provide a source of
immediately available funds for the purchase of bonds put back to the
underwriter and not remarketed. A bank letter of credit is used to
provide this liquidity. The issuer pays an annual fee for the letter
of credit. Any funds drawn on the letter of credit bear interest as
specified in the letter at taxable rates related to the issuing bank's
�./ prime rate.
CSDOC
June 13, 1986
Page 2
Parties to the Transaction - A variable-rate bond issue is a complicated
security to structure and issue. A number of parties are involved:
i
❑ Issuer: The districts.
❑ Remarketing Agent: The underwriter who markets the bonds
initially, then remarkets the bonds which are put. A remarket-
ing agent is appointed when the bonds are issued, and may be
replaced as provided for in the bond documents.
❑ Bank: Issuer of the letter of credit.
❑ Trustee: Paying agent, holder of funds, beneficiary of the
ett�f credit.
❑ Financial Advisor and Bond Counsel are involved at the original
bond issuance, as are counsel to the underwriter, trustee, and
bank.
Costs of the Issue - Issuance costs for a variable-rate issue include
sever�egories, not all of which are involved in a conventional
fixed-rate issue:
❑ Discount: When the bonds are issued, the districts receive
less—money than the face amount of the issue. This difference
between the price paid by the underwriter and the par value
is compensation to the underwriter, and can range from about
0.5 to 0.8 percent on a variable-rate issue.
❑ Underwriter's Expenses: The underwriter's out-of-pocket expenses
in issuing a on s are charged to the issuer.
❑ Letter of Credit Fee: The issuer must pay to the letter of credit
an anin initial an ongoing annual fee, usually in the range
of 0.25 to 1.0 percent of the face amount of the letter. The
amount of the letter of credit is the full par value plus an allow-
ance for interest for a certain period, such as 90 to 180 days,at the legal maximum interest rate. In addition, the issuer
must pay drawing fees and interest under the terns of the
letter of credit on each payment date.
❑ Trustee Fees: Such issues generally need a trustee to hold
ems,receive payments under the letter of credit on behalf
of the bondholders, and to pay principal and interest to the
bondholders.
❑ Annual Remarketin Fee: The remarketing agent receives an
annu ee based on ttie outstanding amount of bonds, usually
0.1 to 0.125 percent per year.
Fixed-rate bonds may also provide for a discount as underwriter com-
pensation. Such discounts are about 1.5 to 3 percent of the issue
amount. This amount is generally included in the underwriter's expenses.
CSDOC
- June 13, 1986
Page 3
Advanta and Disadvantages - The significant advantage of variable-
rate on
is Twer interest, because short-term interest rates are
generally lower than long-term interest rates. The difference between
variable and fixed rates is not consistent.
Variable-rate issues have a number of disadvantages as well:
o They are complicated and expensive to issue.
o The issuer's long-term interest cost is not known.
o They are more difficult than fixed-rate bonds to budget for
and administer.
o The issuer's annual costs are not protected from interest rate
of economic changes.
o The issuer pays debt service monthly or quarterly rather than
semiannually.
Many issuers of variable-rate bonds have approached them as a method
of holding down interest costs during the construction period, and
have planned to convert them to fixed-rate issues at-a future date.
At the time of conversion any unexpended construction funds can be
used to redeem some of the outstanding bonds, to reduce the total
amount outstanding and annual debt service. The issuer would then
have fixed its financing costs for the projects.
Conclusions - The choice between fixed and variable interest rates
must on a case-by-case basis, depending on the issue size
and purpose and on each issuer's financial management philosophy.
Most variable-rate bonds have been issued at times of high interest
rates, to avoid entering into a fixed-rate obligation at the high rates.
Issuers have designed their variable-rate issues to allow them to
convert the bonds to fixed rates when interest rates later dropped.
Today's fixed rates are lower than they have been for several years.
Previous variable-rate issues are being converted to fixed rates.
While today's variable rates are lower than today's fixed rates, the
fixed rates guarantee today's favorable interest rates throughout the
life of your debt issue.
A district which chooses to finance by issuing debt at this point
should do so because using debt is in the best long-term interests of
its customers. We believe that fixed-rate debt is the most conservative
approach and the one that most fulfills this obligation.
Method of Sale - If the decision is made to proceed with fixed-rate
e t�l a issue can be sold by either competitive or negotiated sale.
In a negotiated sale, an underwriter is selected to work with the
districts and their advisors to structure the issue. The selected
underwriter then presents the districts with a bond purchase agreement
based on the deal that has been negotiated. In a competitive sale,
the districts and their advisors structure the issue, prepare an official
statement describing the issue and the districts, secure ratings, and
CSDOC
June 13, 1986
Page 4
actively market the issue to a wide variety of underwriting firms.
The district boards adopt a notice of sale, which is the official adver-
tisement for the issue. At a given place and time, bids are received
from underwriters and the sale is awarded to the underwriter bidding
the lowest interest cost.
In our experience, a competitive sale saves money for the issuer,
both at the time of issue and throughout the life of the debt. Certain
extremely large or complicated debt issues may profit from negotiated
sale, but these are very rare. This issue will be a very solid,
straightforward issue which should find a ready market. We believe
that competitive sale should be the districts' approach. If at any
time between now and the sale date we believe that conditions have
changed to favor a negotiated sale, we will so advise the districts and
proceed with the selection of an underwriter.
The type of debt to be issued is a critical point which must be decided
as early as possible in the process. It would be very helpful if the
districts' staff and boards could advise us of their opinions as soon
as possible. We will be happy to discuss the matter and answer any
questions.
Very truly yours,
BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATES
`� t . Stovall
LJS:mt
L15-C
�1
i
;4P.F.HDiH
L 1)i I'll P.O. Box :W 15ZJ23arx^., ?... - _.
June 24, 1986
Re:
Orange County Sanitation District
Certificates of Participation
1986 Issue I
Dear Board Member:
As the final decisions on the upcoming Sanitation District financing
approach, I thought it would be worthwhile to share my ideas on the type
and nature of the bond sale.
Given my experience with municipal bond sales at the Irvine Ranch Water
District, I feel that a negotiated issue, incorporating both variable and
fixed rate components, would be most effective under current market
conditions. This financing arrangement would allow each of the
Sanitation Districts to structure their proportionate share of the sale
in a manner most advantageous to its interests. The long range impact of
this decision is so significant that I urge you to carefully consider the
benefits of a negotiated sale of a variable/fixed rate bond issue.
Competitive issues are most cost effectively sold if the issuer is well
known in the marketplace. However, if the issuer is not well recognized,
a strong pre—sale marketing campaign is needed to explain the credit and
details of the transaction to potential investors. Investors and
underwriters alike demand an interest rate premium to compensate
themselves for uncertainty. Given the Sanitation District's sixteen year
absence from the market, the pre—sale information flow provided through a
negotiated underwriting is a critical ingredient to the success of the
program.
The municipal marketplace has experienced volatile market swings during
the past few months. A negotiated financing allows the District and the
underwriter the flexibility to capitalize on market movements by
determining the optimal time to sell the bonds. Because a competitive
sale must be advertised and scheduled for sale at a set time and date,
that approach is inflexible and provides no recourse to short term
fluctuations in market conditions. Alternatively, a negotiated sale may
be delayed if an underwriter's detailed market analyses and general
economic indices indicate that a more opportune market "window" will
open. Thus the terms of a negotiated sale equip the issuer to gauge the
most effective timing of the sale.
June 23, 1986 i
Page 2
In today's market, flexibility in the timing of the sale could be
critical because of pending tax legislation. If the present Senate
v0sion, or House version for that matter, of the bill passes, there
could be significant negative implications for this issue. Under the
Joint Statement issued with respect to H. ,R. 3838, the effective date of
this tax bill will be at the time it is signed into law. This could
potentially cause problems for prescheduled competitive deals but would
not effect a negotiated deal which could be quickly moved up.
Under a competitive sale, the responsibility for preparing the bonds for
market rests upon the District. Given investor uncertainty over the
Senate tax reform proposal , pre-marketing disclosure is a key element in
the sale. If an underwriter is involved in the legal and financial
structuring of the issue prior to sale, disclosure will be tailored to
the specific needs of the marketplace, resulting in greater investor
acceptance.
Historically, issuers have argued that competitive sales lower the
overall cost of funding by eliminating the investment banker's fee.
Given current market conditions, this viewpoint no longer holds true on
several levels. First, on a bond sale of $100 million in the currently
volatile marketplace, it is unlikely that there would be more than a few
bidders and the bids submitted would tend not to be competitive.
Secondly, the benefits of pre-sale marketing and disclosure offset the
management fee costs. And, finally, management fees have become
increasingly aggressive in recent months. Current gross spreads are
lower than competitive sale takedown fees witnessed only several years
ago. Given the added experience that an investment banker can bring to
the District, coupled with today's low fees, a negotiated financing will
ensure that our financing will flexibly meet all our needs at the lowest
possible cost.
Finally, I feel that the Board members must address the question of
issuing fixed or floating rate instruments. Personally, I recommend that
each of the Sanitation Districts bonds be issued on a floating rate
basis. Although a floating rate issue is, in theory, partially "riskier"
than a fixed rate issue, the enclosed chart illustrates that the
potential for interest rate savings clearly outweigh the risks attached
to such financing. Please understand that products are available in the
marketplace which enable us to issue both fixed and variable bonds under
one issue and, if any individual District decides to issue bonds only on
a fixed rate basis, it does not preclude any other District from issuing
on a variable rate basis.
Sincerely,
WATER DISTRICT
Peer Swan
President, Board of Directors
INTEREST RATE HISTORY
FIXED vs . VARIABLE TAX-EXEMPT RATES
(Average Monthly Rates)
15.0
14.0
Bond Buyer
13.0 30-Year Revenue
Bond Index
12.0
11.0
o
10.0
9.0 A
y r \
C r
6.0 i J.J . Kenny
\ 7-Day Variable
i - Rate Index
7.0
4.0 T1 ) 1 1 1111- I ' I I I i IHIi t i i I� i i i i p i i if-1
January 61 July January 62 July January e3 July January e4 July January 85 July January 86
Months-January 1981 through June 1986
INTEREST RATE HISTORY _
FIXED Ys. VARIABLE TAX-EIEMPT RATES
IAvereage Monthly Rates)
J.J. Kenny Bond Buyer
7-Day Variable 30-Year Revenue
Month Rate Index Bond Index
-------- ------`------- -"-____
Jan-81 5.824 10.670
Feb-81 6.008 11.008
Mar-81 5.950 10.900
Apr-81 6.123 11.218
May-81 6.335 11.606
Jun-81 6.273 11.493
Jul-81 6.749 11.818
Aug-81 8.113 12.955 -
Sep-Bl 9.008 13.944
Dct-al 8.490 13.830
Nor-81 7.143 13.130
Dec-81 6.823 13.863
Jan-82 6.962 14.210
Feb-82 7,145 13.785
Mar-82 7.491 13.615
Apr-82 7.477 13.258
May-02 7.559 12.750
Jun-82 7.786 13.295
Jul-82 7.301 13.345
Pug-82 6.361 12.468
Sep-82 5.323 11.545
Oct-82 4.710 10.472
Nov-82 4.633 10.743
Dec-B2 4.940 10.795
Jan-03 4.818 10.250
Feb-03 4.323 10.110
Mar-83 4.680 9.788
Apr-83 5.060 9.513 _
May-83 5.375 9.555
Jun-83 5.310 10.095
Jul-83 4.920 10.038
Aug-83 5.330 10,250
Sep-83 5,542 10.196
tjct-83 5.390 10.143
Nov-B3 5.330 10.210
Dec-83 5.578 10.402
Jan-84 5.523 10.033
Feb-84 5.375 10.003
Mar-84 5.400 10.366
Apr-84 3.610 10.263
May-84 5.980 10,745
Jun-B4 5.916 11,140
Jul-84 6.053 10.840
Aug-84 6,424 10.396
i
INTEREST RATE HISTORY
FIXED vs. VARIABLE TAB-EXEMPT RATES
1Avereage Monthly Retell
J.J. Kenny Bond Buyer
7-Day Variable 30-Year Revenue
Month Rate Index Bond Index
............... ..............
Sep-64 6.586 10.606
Oct-84 6.225 10.763
Nov-04 3.736 10.690
Dec-84 6.078 10.400
Jan-05 5.601 9.993
Feb-85 4.890 9.960
Mir-85 4.926 10.234
Apr-83 5.170 9.845
May-85 5.302 9.458
Jun-85 4.863 9.178
Jul-85 4.408 9.203
Aug-85 5.040 9.420
Sep-BS 5.320 9.610
Oct-115 3.105 9.380
Nov-85 4.960 1.258
Dec-85 6.968 8.963
Jan-86 7.008 8.504
Feb-86 5.533 7.985
Nar-86 4.770 7.735
Apr-86 4.633 7.608
Illy-86 4.610 7.BBS
Jun-86 4.360 2.435
Average Ritei 3.867 10.704
June 19, 1986
REF #917
STAFF REPORT
PCB SOURCE CONTROL PROGRAM
In 1982 the staff undertook an extensive program to identify sources of PCB in
our service area. The effort to systematically look for sources of
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) began with the collection and analysis of
treatment plant influent and effluent samples. A four-phase program to
identify and control point sources of PCB began in the second quarter of 1983
and was completed in late 1985 without locating any uncontrolled sources of
PCB. Phase I consisted of the initial gathering of PCB reference material.
In Phase II this material was reviewed and summarized. Phase III included
inspection and sampling of industries. In Phase IV, trunkline wastewater and
grease/solids samples were collected and analyzed.
In November 1985, the Districts substantially revised and expanded the PCB
Source Control Program (Phase V) to identify and control PCB.sources to comply
with our NPDES Ocean Permit conditions. Phase V consisted of the following
eleven tasks:
Task 1 Wastewater Trunkline Sampling
Task 2 Industry Inspection and Sampling
Task 3 Treatment Methods: Removal Efficiencies from
Existing Processes and Physical-Chemical Treatment
Task 4 Verification of Sampling Method
Task 5 Background PCB Levels in Domestic Sewage
and Potable Water
Task 6 Trunkline Grease/Solids Deposits Sampling
Task 7 Laboratory Experiments: Effects of Chlorination
and Importance of Sewer Sediments as Source of
Wastewater PC8
Task 8 Evaluation of Laboratory Results/Interlaboratory
Comparisons
Task 9 Updated Literature Search
Task 10 Progress Report/Meetings
Task 11 Final Report
The eleven tasks in Phase V have now been completed and reported to the -
Regional Water Quality Control Board. Over 840 samples have been collected
and analyzed for PCB. The results indicate that there are no discernable
discrete industrial sources of PCB discharging into the Districts' system, but
that low level PCB contamination may be universal, including domestic sewage.
The Districts could not demonstrate that PCB was generated during chlorination
of the wastewater; nor that leaching from sewer grease/solids deposits is an
important source of influent wastewater PCB. Removal of PCB through the
Districts' existing treatment system ranges between 32% to 58%. Results
were inconclusive in demonstrating improved removal efficiency when ferric
chloride and anionic polymer were added to the wastewater entering the
treatment plants.
An important part of the Phase V work was an evaluation of the analytical
techniques for determining PCB at the extremely low concentrations encountered
in wastewater. In January of this year the Districts initiated a parallel
final effluent testing program with other laboratories. The results of the
eight EPA approved outside laboratories indicate that the Districts are in
compliance with our effluent PCB limitation of 0.45 parts per billion (ppb).
Investigations into the analytical techniques used by the various laboratories
showed some large differences. The outside laboratory results showed
consistent compliance with our limitation, whereas our laboratory results
consistently showed non-compliance. The published EPA method allows
considerable analytical discretion. It appears the differences in techniques
among the laboratories contribute to broad variations in precision and
accuracy. These differences appear to have also contributed to our reporting
significantly higher PCB results than other laboratories.
From the above discussion, the accuracy and precision of the analytical
results reported for the PCB Source Control Program and in our routine final
effluent testing are in question. This must be taken into account when
reviewing the results because of the limitations that are implicit at these
reported values.
Until the uncertainties about the laboratory techniques are resolved, final
effluent samples will be sent to other approved laboratories for analyses and
subsequent regulatory reporting. During this period, input and direction will
be sought from EPA and the RWQCB to study and investigate the differences
between the laboratory methods. The staff has recommended to the EPA and the
RWQCB that until these analytical issues are resolved, data interpretation,
decision making, and regulatory actions based on the Districts' reported
results should be deferred.
• .,S TRINGFELLOM TREATMENT PL( JSCHARGE REPORT 6/25/86
MAY 1986
SAMPA
EPA2 Permit Limit.
CSDGCl Pretreatment Standards For Stringfellow at Stringfellcw3 '
Industrial Use Ordinance for New Electroplster Peak Deily Discharge Treatment Plant State of Californie4
Maximum Allowable Sources Maximum Maximum Allowable Discharge to SARI Primary Drinking
Concentration (mg/l)++ Concentration (mg/1) Concentration (mg/1) May 1986 (mg/1) Meter Standards (mg/1)
Arsenic 2.0 N.S.+ 2.0 L.T.D+++ 0.05
Cadmium 1.0 0.69 0.064 L.T.D. 0.010
Chromium 2.0 2.77 2.0 0.057 0.05
Copper 3.0 3.38 3.0 0.063 N.S.
Lead 2.0 0.69 0.58 L.T.O. 0.05
Mercury 0.03 N.S. 0.03 L.T.D. 0.002
Nickel 10.0 3.98 3.51 0.013 N.S.
Silver 5.0 0.43 0.43 L.T.D. 0.05
Zinc 10.0 2.61 0.7 0.028 N.S.
Cyanide (Total) 5.0 1.2 1.2 0.020 N.S.
Total Toxic
Organics 0.58 2.13 0.58 L.T.D. 0.33 5
Flow, Gallons Per day
Total Monthly: 504,000 Average Productions 30,000 Permit Deily Limit& 187,080
+ N&Sai not specified. ++ m 1s (milligrams per liter) is egivelent to parts per million. +++ L.T.D.t lose then detectable
1 Effective July 1, 1983. The CSDOC industrial control ordinance entitled "Regulations for Use of Districts Sewerage Facilities"
provides for the enforcement of EPA Industrial Categorical Pretreatment Standards when they become effective.
CSDOC enforce. the standards that are most restrictive.
2 Federal Register, July 15, 1903 pp. 32463-32487. These standards became effective April 27, 1984 for
non-integrated facilities, and June 30, 1904 for integrated facilities.
3 Stringfellow monthly operating report, Noy, 1986. EPA Region I%.
4 California State Department of Health Services, Sanitary Engineering Branch, Primary Drinking Meter Standards, June 1983.
5 This value I. sum of limits for endrin, linden, mathoxychlor, toxsphans, 2,44, 2,4,5-D, ellvex, and TTHMs.
't
4 � .
elk
h t =c
r �
L' 1. _
`• .`�'' - � �+ice' g' r _ ' �_ -
7
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
YS-EbS wE'UE
�0 30
x 3729
June 20, 1986 E UNTmNVALEf Z-L1c:,�u3_ = -
�
o•Ai EAc.a•o
SUMMARY REPORT
STRINGFELLOW LONG-TERM REMEDIAL PLAN
The purpose of this report is to update the Directors on the status of the
Stringfellow site and provide a preliminary review of the California Department
of Health Services (DOHS) recently completed draft report entitled "Stringfellow
Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study: Development and Initial
Screening of Alternatives". The report was prepared by their consultant,
Science Applications International Corporation, and issued on May 30, 1986.
PURPOSE OF DOHS REPORT - DEVELOPMENT AND INITIAL SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES
The purpose of the DOHS report is to formulate broad alternative long-term
remedial actions to prevent or minimize the migration of contaminated
groundwater from the Stringfellow site, and to prevent or minimize the impact of
contaminants which have already migrated from the site. The report screens the
alternative remedial actions for technical feasibility, environmental/public
health impacts, and environmental suitability. The report is termed a "working _
document" and will be used for discussion at future community meetings involving
the DOHS, EPA, and the public (a meeting in Orange County is planned for this
summer) . The report represents an intermediate step in the complete long term
feasibility process.
STRINGFELLOW BACKGROUND
The Stringfellow hazardous waste site was operated as a hazardous waste disposal
facility from 1956 to 1972. It is located in the middle of a narrow box canyon
one-half mile north of Highway 60 in Riverside County near Glen Avon (see
Attachment 1).
Approximately 34 million gallons of liquid industrial 'waste from Los Angeles,
Orange, and other surrounding counties were deposited at the site. Included in
this amount were spent acids, caustics, solvents, pesticides, cyanides, and
metal compounds. The site was eventually closed when it became apparent that
liquid waste was percolating from the waste pits and into the grounawater and
that a down-canyon plume of contaminated groundwater was advancing toward the
community of Glen Avon and into the Chino Basin. Mitigation measures began in
1980 with the draining and minor excavation of the open disposal pits and
covering them with a clay cap. Also included were concrete diversion channels
that intercept surface flows and divert them away from the site.
1
INTERIM REMEDIAL PLAN
The Sanitation Districts became involved in the project when the Santa Ana
Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) approached us for authorization to permit
contaminated groundwater extracted from the Stringfellow site to be discharged
to the Districts' sewerage system after pretreatment to Districts' standards.
Conditional permission was granted in late 1984 by the Boards of Directors after
having considered the suitability of the project for discharge to the Districts'
sewer system. In December 1985, the interim remedial plan was executed when
discharge commenced from the treatment plant constructed by the California
Department of Health Services and operated by the EPA. Daily analysis of the
treated groundwater has shown that the discharge is consistently in full
compliance with the stringent limitations of the discharge permit issued by
SAWPA as authorized by the Districts. The plant is currently operating at
approximately 25,000 to 40,000 gallons per day. The interim permit allows up
to 187,000 gallons per day.
LONG-TERM REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
The long term solution to the clean up of the Stringfellow site falls into three
broad categories (see Attachment 2).
° The first is the interception of the clean surface water and
groundwater prior to its entry into the Stringfellow site.
This alternative would prevent the ongoing contamination of
groundwater and its movement down-canyon and into the groundwater
basin adjacent to the Santa Ana River. ..�
° The second alternative is to excavate all the contaminated soil
and waste mixture from the Stringfellow site, and then either
treat it on-site and rebury it or remove it to an off-site
location.
° The third major alternative is to intercept the contaminated
groundwater after it leaves the Stringfellow site, treat it,
and provide final disposal to a POTW (presumably our facilities
through the SARI line) or by on-site solar evaporation.
All of these alternatives have received preliminary evaluation within the DOHS
report. Key to their final evaluation is the development of a groundwater model
and completion of the final remedial investigation report which is due in late
1986.
According to the DOHS report, the following conclusions have been made regarding
the three major alternatives:
Intercept Clean Water Prior to Entering Site:
The first major alternative, the interception of clean water prior to its
entrance into the Stringfellow site, appears to be both economically and
technically feasible. Wells would be drilled up-canyon from the site and
the clean water would be pumped to a creek bed. Its only apparent
2
limitation is the inability to completely eliminate the problem. That is,
.� even with an interceptor system completely in service, it appears that the
migration of contaminated groundwater into the Stringfellow site will
continue. This is because full interception of the up-canyon water is not
possible. The effect of intercepting the clean groundwater would be to
significantly decrease the amount of contaminated groundwater necessary for
interception, treatment, and disposal . The report estimates that the
existing mid-canyon extraction rate of contaminated groundwater would
decrease approximately 50%.
Excavate and Treat or Haul Contaminated Soil/Waste:
The second major alternative, excavation of the contaminated waste and soil
material and either treat it and rebury it or haul it away, does not appear
to be feasible according to the consultant. The estimated volume of '
material necessary for removal is approximately 1 million cubic yards. This
is equivalent to a football field 570' deep. The volume itself is
significant but other problems also exist.
Assuming that the material is removed off-site for ultimate disposal with or
without some kind of stabilization step, the likelihood of obtaining local
permits and community permission is doubtful . The problem with the McColl
Dump is an example of the near impossibility of transferring Superfund waste
from one site to another.
Excavation followed by on-site treatment and reburial was also considered.
�..� The soil would first be treated utilizing incineration or chemical
stabilization. Several technologies were examined and all have been judged
to be unsuitable because decontamination would not be to a degree which
would render the soil non-hazardous. The report does conclude that it is
feasible to leave the contaminated material in place if effective dewatering
is accomplished.
Pretreatment and Disposal to SAWPA/Districts' System or Solar Evaporation:
The third major alternative, down-canyon interception of the contaminated
groundwater followed by treatment and disposal to a POT'W (presumably the
SAWPA/Districts' SARI system) or through solar evaporation, is an
alternative or a sub-alternative found in all of the recommended
alternatives appearing within the DOHS report.
In all of the Stringfellow remedial alternatives identified by the
consultant in the report, there apparently will exist the need for the
interception of down-canyon contaminated groundwater. This is because
upstream interception cannot prevent 100% of the water movement onto the
site and, even given the feasibility of excavation, significant quantities
of contaminated material would be left behind in the hard decomposed granite
and in fractures in the bedrock.
The 30 year present worth of the various alternatives examined range from
$97-334 million. Attachment 3 summarizes five alternatives presented in the
._, report. The report states that these are not meant to be a comprehensive
3
representation of the potential alternatives. These five are simply a
combination of the more promising technologies that can be applied to the �..
problem.
The report points out that there are literally hundreds of possible combinations
of technologies that can be potentially applied to the alternatives. All
alternatives identify the long term operation of the treatment plant and all
identify disposal of some volume of waste to a POTW (presumably the Santa Ana
River Interceptor and ultimately the Districts) and/or to on-site solar
evaporation ponds.
REMAINING TASKS OF FEASIBILITY STUDY
The alternative ultimately recommended may include the use of the SARI line for
the long-term disposal of some of the extracted groundwater after having
received suitable treatment. This will be determined after the long-term
remedial action plan has been completed.
Attachment 4 is the Executive Summary and the Table of Contents of the DOHS
report. Directors interested in obtaining a copy of the report can contact
Blake Anderson, the Districts' Director of Operations, who will request extra
copies from the DOHS. A public meeting is planned this, summer to receive
comment on the report. Page ES-3 of the Executive Summary outlines the
remaining tasks that must be performed to complete the planning process.
4
ATTACHMENT 1
NOTHERN
Stringfellow Site Plan PITAREA —
MID—CANYON
WELL NO. IW3
'v __,- . '. _ • SOUTHERN
•o _ • • _; PITAREA
a
LOWER CANYON
q ,m .eo
• 541(/M/((I
• • • --A9IDCANYON—
LOWER CANYON
WELL NO. MW- 17B
GLEN AVON
♦ `�`. PYOITE
CliANNEL .
COMMUNITY GLEN AVON
WELL NO. FC-211A2 ELEMENTARY
SCIIOOL
Figure 3-1 . Location of Wells Selected as Representing Average Contaminant Concentrations for Mid-Canyon, Lower
Canyon, and Community.
Taken from Oraft Report: SUA ngfellow facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study; May 30, 1986; D011S
ATTACHMENT 2
Excavate Contaminated
Intercept Clean Water Soil/Waste Mixture Extract Contaminated Groundwater
Upindbnl GmuOdwbr SYrla. Wier O.-Sib SO.I.I.ted W-Sib Gmumwtor
W�YNrrnl wwY.rnl S011 X.n.Yrrnl w.'emeel pr pi. Ww3twnt
lncte
Ydll .All -- �WAIw
SYalr SAti.1 lonlrliYtoO
1 -Situ GrOu_1
Yllrltic.11oa Cot in.ud [onlrlrbd
U...trWbA Gm°^'Yrtor Gr..W.t.r
Lroundwl.r Oltpot.l Dltfeul
OLpOUI _n_____-
bI1iM i___ ; 1_Y_--- _---__----
;
t be.r.11oo -- ...i.ru Mo irul.enl Inllsa W Ir'tlr.t
L_
Dhpoal i , i i r-3"-"
wrn[Y 1 in..r.a
Db[Wn• rur rash. a-So. Off. It. a-sw orr-sn.
[M IDIY Sets KRA 41.J.[II SYrb[. p1Y Sol.r XGQ
WS.mnu.lrud .c lilt: fonds facility DltcWrp. 10d{ I.Llllt
81" wbr I
� Dbpol l i burLLlon L-n--i
1 ..0 im rnl YO Im.Leem 1.+eenI W Irl.trnl
UncrlulmtOA Sur/¢. WulnlbalOn __
DluWrp. ob ul i �_ _
GmuMwbr L_ ___Ar
DLpnld - Sib
tonlblu bdU.I.M.i
❑ur.tlon W- Groundwbr lyd
-WYpoltLLl.n Y[YY Db ul GrounAutler
.M Incl..nllr r¢ility IO DhYobl
Ptnctbn [.incur blracbd
[turLL10. 11YX11Y llII
WII Yeulnllullr SWII - --- Gonb.In.IWI
SPI.. Inc lnunlbn Ytir Gruudwto
LN Iloilo. -Dl ul
w-lit.
G 1., 11
f¢Il lty (
YY AcllOn -- Nu Mtl�—
Figure 2-5. 'I'eclmlopy Gndsination Fhm,A Ivirt
Taken from Draft Report: Stringfellow Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study; May 30, IN16; DODS
ATTACHMENT 3
STRINGFELLOW SITE LONG TERM REMEDIAL PLAN
FIVE REPRESENTATIVE COMBINED ALTERNATIVESI)
.� CAPITAL ANNUAL 30 YEAR
COST O&M PRESENT 'WORTH
ALTERNATIVE 1
Extract On-Site Contaminated Groundwater
Wells, tanks, treatment plant, POTW
disposal, monitoring $ 2,900,000 $ 4,200,000 $ 42,600,000
Extract Downcanvon Contaminated Groundwater
Mid-canyon (existing) wells, freeway wells
and community wells; either treatment and
POTW disposal or solar evaporation 8,200,000 5,700,000 61,900,000
TOTAL $ ll,100,000 $ 9,900,000 $104,500,000
ALTERNATIVE 2
Intercept Clean Water .
Groundwater interceptor system, recap the
site, improve surface water collectors,
monitoring $ 25,300,000 $ 400,000 $ 29,400,000
Extract On-Site Contaminated Groundwater
Wells, tanks, treatment plant, POTW
disposal, monitoring 3,100,000 3,300,000 20,800,000
Extract Downcanyon Contaminated Groundwater
Mid-canyon (existing) wells, freeway wells -
and community wells; either treatment and
POTW disposal or solar evaporation 26,300,000 2,900,000 a6,400,000
TOTAL $ 54,700,000 $ 6,600,000 $ 96,600,000
ALTERNATIVE 3
Excavate Sail and Intercept Clean 'Water
Groundwater interceptor system, excavate
digable soil, on-site neutralization,
reburial, improve surface water collectors,
monitoring
$ 79,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 84,200,000
Extract On-Site Contaminated Groundwater
Wells, tanks, treatment plant, POTW
disposal, monitoring 3,100,000 3,300,000 20,800,000
Extract Downcanvon Contaminated Groundwater
Mid-canyon (existing) wells, freeway wells
and community wells; either treatment and
POTW disposal or solar evaporation 26,300,000 2,900,000 46,400,000
TOTAL $108,400,000 $ 6,700,300 $151,400,000
�) Draft Report: Stringfellow Facility Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study,
California Department of Health Services, May 1986, data from tables 6-2 through 6-6.
ATTACHMENT 3
(CONT'D)
CAPITAL ANNUAL 30 YEAR
COST O&M PRESENT 'WORTH
ALTERNATIVE 4
Excavate Soil and Intercept Clean Water
Groundwater interceptor system, excavate
digable soil, onsite neutralization,
onsite incineration, reburial, improved
surface water collectors, monitoring S264,000,000 $ 300,000 $266,800,000
Extract On-Site Contaminated Groundwater
Wells, tanks, treatment plant, POTW
disposal, monitoring 3,100,000 3,300,000 20,800,000
Extract Oowncanyon Contaminated Groundwater
Mid-canyon (existing) wells, freeway wells
and community wells; either treatment and
POTW disposal or solar evaporation
26,300,000 2,900,000 46,400,000
TOTAL
$293,400,000 $ 6,500,000 $334,000,000
ALTERNATIVE 5
Excavate Soil and Intercept Clean Water
Groundwater interceptor system, excavate
digable soil, transport to offsite RCRA
location, improve surface water collectors, -
monitoring 218,300,000 400,000 222.400,000
Extract On-Site Contaminated Groundwater
Wells, tanks, treatment plant, POTW
disposal, monitoring 3,100,000 3,300,000 20,800,000
Extract Oowncanyon Contaminated Groundwater
Mid-canyon (existing) wells, freeway wells
and community wells; either treatment and
POTW disposal or solar evaporation 26,300,000 2.900,000 46,400,000
TOTAL $247,700,000 $ 6,600,000 $289,600,000
w�
ATTACHMENT 4
EXECUTIVE SU`!MARY
1.0 L`R'RODUCTIOY
The Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site, located in Riverside Cocnz ,
California was omeraced as a hazardous waste disposal facli_, from _:_- _o
1972. About 34 million gallons of Liquid industrial wastes were disposed cf
the site, including spent acids, caustics, solvents, pesticides, cyanides, and
metal compounds. During the course of operation it became apparent chat __:__c
wastes were percolating from the waste pits into the groundwater and
nation was detected downgradient.
The site is situared on the southern slopes of the Jurupa `fountains
within a box canyon known as Pyrite Canyon. Approximately one mile soutcwasr
of the site lies the community of Glen Avon. The original disposal sita covers
approximately 17 acres and is located at the head of Pyrite Canyon. A contami-
nated groundwater plume extends downgradient throughout Pyrite Canyon with cor.-
raminant concentrations decreasing with increasing distance from the original
disposal site. A plume of contaminaced water has been Located which axtands
southerly into Glen Avon, and threatens drinking water wells.
During 1981-1982 interim construction was done at the origina-- s_=_ to
reduce pollutant migration, including removal of surface waste, eros_nr. --.-
trot, capping, and barrier wall construction. In addition,
groundwater has been routinely extracted downgradient of =`e s_=_ cr__.
present. As an inrarim measure a aid-canyon tr_a___..r plant `-r
the extracted groundwater was placed in opera_io- 3acemcer =>-_ .
nary analysis indicates that -hese incerim steps have reduced, c_t c_- ___-._-
nated, the migration of pollutants downgradient from the size.
The California Department of Healzh Services (DES) .
through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. EPA Region IS, cont_ac_ed w_ta
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIL) in Marcr.. a
compre-hensively evaluate the Stringfellow Site, perform a remedial iavzs c gatior. (RI)
ES-1
and conduct a feasibility study (FS) to investigate the extent of contamination
r.r
and evaluate methods for mitigating the spread of contaminants from the Site.
The RI process at the Stringfellow Site includes investigation of site
geology, hydrology, water quality, and air quality. In addition, contaminated
groundwater and soils are being sampled and analyzed. The field work investi-
garion is virtually complete. The data generated are being used to develop a
groundwater model and an RI report, both scheduled for completion in late 1986.
This report is part of the FS process. The FS process evaluates tech-
nologies and develops and evaluates specific remedial alternatives which are
applicable at the Site. Figure ES-1 shows the steps in the FS process sche-
matically. The alternatives are screened and analyzed at several points in the
RI/FS process. A -Draft Interim Report on Development and Screening of Reme-
dial Technologies and Alternatives- , issued on July 30, 1985, contains informs- -
tion on the Site configuration, geological and hydrological features of the
Pyrite Canyon area, a characterization of environmental impacts associated with
the present Site condition, and standards and criteria applicable to potential
remedial actions. Information presented in the Interim Report is relevant to -
this report, and, for the most part, is included here by reference only. Both
volumes comprise the Task XI/XII report. -
The purpose of this report is to:
1. Formulate broad alternative remedial actions to: (1) pre-
vent or significantly minimize migration of contamination
from the Site and (2) prevent or minimize impacts from
contaminants which have already migrated from the Site.
2. Screen the alternative remedial actions for technical
feasib ili:/, environmental/public health impacts and
cost.
A subsequent Task XIV report will provide a detailed technical, envi-
ronmental, public health, institutional and cost analysis of the remedial
alternatives which survive the screening presented in this report.
ES-2
FEASIBILITY STUDY PROCESS
CONTRACT TASK NUMBERS
Characterize Problem and Identify
General Resvonse Actions
7ULY 1985
'INTERIM Formulate and Develop
REPORT Alternative Svecifie Technolo its
Screen Soec'_fic Te<:hno Lo its
TASK 11/12— — — Formulate Broad Remedial Action Alteznatives
Environmental and Public Health Screenin¢ I
THIS DOCUMENT Cost Screenin
Eliminate Inavvrovriare Al to^..atives
0 Identify Remaining Remedial
�..i STATUS Action Alternatives
TASK Treatabi ty
13 Studies Detailed Analysis of Alteznatives
Public
Technical Ins ticutianal Cost -=zonmental
Analysis Analvs is Analvs is Health Analysis
Analysis
TASK
14 Summary of Alternaties Evaluation Draft 3eas_S4:icr Stud-,) !
b _ —
TASK
15 Coneen teal Desi zn
TA
SK
Final Feasibility Retort and Resvonsiveness Su.^r_ar, l
Figure ES-1. Schematic Diagram of Feasibility Study Process and its
Relationship to this Status Report, and the Project Contract Task Numbers
ES-3
2.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY SCREENING OF CANDIDATE REMEDIAL ALTERNATPIES
�.a
Development of remedial alternatives is the process of compiling suic-
able technologies into feasible systems to manage and control the source waste
material and the migrating contaminant plume at the Stringfellow Site. The
process is accomplished in three steps:
• First, the treatment and disposal options are defined in
very broad terms. Figure ES-2 illustrates the full range
of treatment and disposal options which could be employed
in solving Stringfellow Site problems.
• Second, the specific treatment, mitigation, and disposal
technologies are related to the general options in Step
One above.
• Third, specific remedial alternatives are developed.
Treatment and disposal technologies are combined to
create remedial alternatives to manage the source
material and migrating plume at 'the Stringfellow Site.
Remedial action is required to control and manage four primary types
of materials: (1) uncontaminated surface water runoff from surrounding drainage
areas; (2) uncontaminated groundwater from areas upgradient of the Site; (3)
the contaminated soil/waste mixture; and (4) contaminated ground-waters from
beneath the Site and from the downgradient plume. Individual technologies for
each of the four primary material types were evaluated, and then selectively
combined into potentially suitable technology combinations and alternatives.
The results of this screening process are summarized in the following
subsections.
Hanaeement of Clean Surface 'dater
Uncontaminated surface water should continue to be diverted around the
Site. Diverting Clean surface waters is more effective and less expensive than
managing and treating waters which have contacted the contaminated material.
Additional run-on and run-off control structures are required, such as new
storm drains and improvement of existing drains. The existing cap over the
Site is not an adequate seal to prevent surface water percolation into the
v
ES-4
Unconlaminued SurHce Yaler Yl/hln I
The Slr l ng/ellaa Sl to Dn lnage gasie I On-Site See flgur0 2-2 for
of$, al 0elalls of 5Pecl f lc
GraunGwater Options for Him,..
UnconlamWleJ Groundua ter Up9ndienl fwtialon went of UnconlamlUied
of the Slr Ingle llaY 51 ti Df/-SI[e Upgrad lent GrounJva ter
DltPosal
roan mler
DlsPosal � I L I In-S ltu _——
u I lreetamnt
Leave In
Pit,* Ilvdnullc
Isobtion See figure 2-3
for
Olverslon o/ Delafls of Specific
Wcan[amlm led
Sur/ace Ya ter Options For Nana9e-
[a] I I On-Site m° of YJsles and
V] Dn-Site Dlspoa [onlamnlloa leJ Sells
GUUant
Contaminated Soll/Wtte Nla lure
gn - Off-Site
ireetment DltPnsd
i
c I On-Sole
Disposal
Falncl.q I On-Site Treatment
0fl-Site See ti9ure 2-9 tar
Dispusel Uelells ul Speu tic
nvl iam tar xJl�.9e.
rent nl lmil anal nJ l¢J
Iunlaw one leJ Grmwnhae lef tle Inv "I. I—_ Dn-511e GrounJw.fcr
li u.lm let anJ Uu.n9raJ mnl IPIma) _._.- 0lapusal
paan9reJ lCnt_I �melumnl� yl
111111 IIII-0uC
II �Ulsyusell
Figure ES-2. Schouitic 11 iagi-+un of ISi'nad ow ions In Iich COI II II Be IIsed To hLlnage SI I-I III',It!I I(w Was It! :il rLnnrl
contaminated material on-site. Any remedial action which involves leaving the
waste material in-place should include installation of a new multi-layer cap.
Hanaeement of Clean Groundwater
Clean groundwaters from upgradient areas will become contaminated if
they contact the contaminated soil/waste mixture on-site. It is desirable to
intercept this clean groundwater before it contacts the contaminated material.
Two apparently feasible technologies for intercepting clean groundwaters are
extraction well barriers and an adit/gallery system. An extraction well bar-
rier could consist of an undetermined number of wells arranged in two rings
along the periphery of the Site. Yells in the outer ring would extract un-
contaminated groundwaters, which would be discharged to surface drainage (e.g ,
Pyrite Creek) or reinjected for groundwater recharge. Wells placed in the
inner ring would be used to extract contaminated leachate from beneath the
Site. The contaminated leachate would require further treatment and/or manage-
ment. Groundwater pumping operations would need to be ccn:rolled to ensure
that the slope of the groundwater was always towards the on-s:_e area,
prevent-ing clean groundwater extraction wells .from becoming contaminated with
leachate. -
An adit/gallery system could consist of a tunnel, approximately 6.000
ft in length with an 11 ft diameter, drilled through bedrock around the perim-
eter of the Site and at elevations lower Chan that of the contaminated solid
waste materials. Separate drain holes would be drilled into off-site soils to
intercept clean groundwaters and into on-sice soil/wastes to remove contami-
naced leachers. Clean groundwaters would be collected and discharged off-site,
whereas the contaminated leachate would require further treatment or restricted
disposal. This technology is hydrologically feasible.
Detailed requirements for a possible extraction well barrier system
and/or adit/gallery await completion and analysis of on-going water modeling
and geological studies.
ES-6
Subsurface passive groundwater barriers, slurry walls or grout cur-
rains, will not provide an adequate seal to prevent the migration of upgradianz
groundwaters into the contaminated soil/waste mixture. However, the nse of
such barriers in conjunction with an adic/gallery drainage system is poten-
tially feasible.
Additional subsurface field work scheduled for mid 1986 is expected to
provide additional data to evaluate interception and extraction of clean
groundwater.
Management of the Soil/.iaste Mixture
It is not possible to excavate all of the on-site- contaminated mace-
rial using conventional excavation techniques. Following excavation, a signi-
ficant quantity of contamination would be left in the hard decomposed granite
(DG) and fractures in the bedrock. The excavacable portions of on-site contami-
nated material comprise the alluvium and "digable" DG with an estimated in.
place volume of 908,000 cubic yards. After excavation the malarial would
... expand (fluff up) to approximately 1,180,000 cubic yards. -
Off-site transport and disposal to a remote location of over one
million cubic yards of excavated concaminated material is not feasible. It
would be virtually impossible to obtain necessary approvals from all the poli-
tical entities and regulatory agencies involved. In addition, the cost would
be very high and, finally, a significant quantity of contamination would be
left on-site in the hard DG and fractured bedrock.
Off-site treatment of the excavated soil/caste mixture would not be
feasible because no adequate facility can be identified.
On-site treatment, including neutralization, rocary kiln lncineracion,
and/or stabilization, of excavated contaminated material would be technically
feasible. However none of these treatment cechniques is expected to decon-
caminace on-site soils cc a degree which would render them a non-hazardous
waste. For example, incineration does not destroy the heavy metals, and scabi-
ES-7
lization and neutralization do not destroy either organics or heavy metals. but
reduce their mobility to various degrees. Therefore redisposal of created
residues must be to a RCRA approved site whether located on-site or off-size.
In-situ treatment of contaminated on-site material is not technically
feasible because of the heterogeneous distribution and variation in depth of
chemicals at the Site.
Excavation of digable contaminated on-site material and redisposal of
the material into newly constructed RCRA approved cells on-site would be tech-
nically feasible. Treatment of excavated soil using neutralization, incinera-
tion and/or stabilization prior to redisposal on-site into RCRA type cells
would also be technically feasible.
It is technically feasible to leave the contaminated on-site material
in place if effective dewatering and isolation of the Site is accomplished.
All options for management of on-site waste materials will leave in
v
place the existing contamination in the hard DG and fractured bedrock which is
not digable by normal excavation methods. Therefore, all remedial alternatives
will require perpetual operation and maintenance to some degree because a con-
taminant source will remain.
Nanaeement of Contaminated Groundwater
Broad options for managing concaminated groundwaters include contain-
ment, on-site extraction, and extraction downgradient. Containment of on-sice
leachata, or ocher contaminated groundwaters, with subterranean barriers would
not be feasible because of probable leakage problems. The annropriataness of
candidate technologies for rreacing concaminared groundwacers vary depending on
the levels of contaminants present. In general, leachate from the on-site area
is characterized as heavily contaminated, whereas the mid-canyon groundwaters
are moderately contaminated and groundwaters from the lower canyon and cor..mu-
nicy areas are Lightly contaminated.
..a
ES-8
Heavily contaminated and moderately contaminated groundwaters from =he
cn-site and mid-canyon areas must be subjected to treatment prior to any form
of disposal except for disposal to a Class I RCRA approved disposal sita.
Treatment of heavily contaminated groundwaters from the on-site and mid-canyon
areas to meet surface water discharge standards or reinjection criteria is not
technically feasible. Thus, this groundwater will require disposal co a POT*,;
or- to solar evaporation ponds after 'treatment.
Treatment of lightly contaminated groundwater in the lower canyon and
community area to meet discharge standards for surface discharge or groundwater
reinjection would be technically feasible. Disposal of untreated contaminated
groundwater from the lower canyon and community areas to a POTA would also be
technically feasible.
Extraction well barriers are the only methods considered technically
feasible to intercept the contaminated groundwater plume dcwngradient of the
Site. The present status of extraction well barriers is:
�..r e A mid-canyon extraction well barrier is partially in
place and operating, and is expected to soon be fully in
place and operating.
e A new lower canyon extraction well barrier near Highway
60 is recommended for early implementation.
e An additional extraction well barrier(s) in the community
may be recommended later, depending upon the results of a
groundwater modeling study just underway.
The provision of a permanent alternate water supply to residents of
Glen Avon currently receiving bottled water funded by the State wi.. Se an
element of the long-term remedial actions implemented cc mange_=_ -`a
downgradienc groundwater plume. The alternate water supply program -a ¢o=
addressed in this report but will be discussed in the detailed evaluac:_r.s o'
institutional and public health factors which will be included in the Taal- X-_
FS report.
v
ES-9
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH SCREENING
v
Section 3.0 of this report presents a discussion of the methodology
employed in environmental and public health screening of proposed remedial
alternatives. Routes of exposure, population exposed, and a toxicity and
exposure evaluation are presented. Environmental and public health impacts of
specific technologies are presented. No remedial technology combinations were
eliminated on the basis of environmental and public health screening.
4.0 COST ESTIMATES
Section 4.0 of the report presents capital and operation and mainte-
nance (O&M) cost estimates for twenty seven individual treatment and disposal
technologies under consideration. Table 4-1 (in the text only) summarizes the
costs and supporting detail is presented in approximately 50 pages. The indi-
vidual treatment and disposal technologies are combined into technically feasi-
ble combinations in Section 5.0. The reader may estimate the cost of other
technology combinations using Section 4.0, if desired. The accuracy of these
estimates may vary within a range of 100 percent above to 50 percent below
actual costs. _
5 .0 COST OF TECHNOLOGY COMBINATIONS
Estimated costs for the various technology combinations are presented
in chis section of the report. A technology combination is an assembly of
remedial technologies applied to contaminant pathways and points of exposure in
one area, or one media, only. Because of the complexity of the Stringfellow
Site, technology combinations were first cost estimated and analyzed, and then
assembled into remedial alternatives for costing in Section 6.0 (below) .
The technology combinations for downgradient groundwater management
are cost estimated for two different scenarios: (1) the Site is dewacered, and
(2) the Site is not dewatered. The average cost for each condition is ther.
used during Later analyses.
ES-10
Costs for on-site technology combinations are presented far;
1. No Action.
2. On-site Leachate Management Onlv; (no dewatering) .
3. Dewatering On1v; dewater the Site by means of an adit/ .
gallery system or extraction wells, with recapping and
surface drainage improvements. Minimal excavation of
contaminated soil is included.
4. Dewatering, Excavation, Treatment by Neutralization, and
RCRA Cell Construction; dewater the Site plus excavation
of the digable contaminated soil, neutralization of the
soil, and redeposicion into on-site RCRA type cells.
5. Dewatering, Excavation, Treatment by Incineration. and
RCRA Cell Construction; dewater the Site, with excavation
of the digable soil, neutralization and incineration, and
redeposition into RCRA type cells.
6. Dewatering, Excavation Plus Disposal to Off-Site RCRA
Site; dewater the Site, with excavation of the digable
soil, transport and disposal to an off-site RCRA per-
mitted disposal facility.
6.0 REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE SELECTION
In this section remedial alternatives were developed by assemoiing
technology combinations (5.0 above) into feasible systems to manage and control
the source waste material and the migrating contaminant pi.:me at the String-
fellow Sice.
Downgradient extraction well barriers and extracted water management
are included in all Stringfellow remedial alternatives regardless of the speci-
fic remedial actions implemented in upgradient or on-site areas,
Estimated costs for general remedial alternatives are presented in
Table ES-1. In terms of estimated 30 years present worth costs the remedial
alternatives range in cost from $97 to $334 million. Initial capital cost for
remedial alternatives ranges from $53 co $293 million.
ES-11
Table ES-1. Summary of Total Capital, Annual 06M, and 30 Year Present
Worth Costs for General Remedial Alternatives Including _
Downgradient Extraction and Management
Costs ($1,000)
30 Year
Capital Annual Present
Remedial Alternative at the Site Cost O&M Worth
(1) Extraction and treatment of 20 gpm from 11, 100 9,912 104,526
on-site wells with no dewatering
(2) Adit/gallery installation, and recapping 54,750 6,593 96,831
on-site area
(3) On-sice soil excavation with on-site 108,480 6,700 151,390
disposal in RCRA-type cells
(4) On-site excavation with neutralization, 293 ,470 6,450 334,024
incineration, and redisposal to an
on-site RCRA type call
(5) On-site excavation with off-site disposal 247,750 6,593 289,651 '
ES-12
In the next step of the Feasibility Study (:ask XI4) a de=ailed.
evaluation of each of these remedial alternatives will be made, except :or
-excavation with off-site disposal" , which has been eliminated for inst*=-
tional and cost reasons, and "Vo Action" which has been eliminated for public
health and environmental reasons.
ES-13
Table of Contents
Title
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _S _
1.0 INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
2.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY OF CANDIDATE REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES. . . . . . . . L:
2.1 Alternative Screening Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
2.1.1 Remedial Alternative Technology Combinations. . . . . . . .2.3
2.1.2 Groundwater Treatment Technology Combinations. . . . . . . 2-13
2.2 Management of Clean Surface Water. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-13
2.3 Management of the Clean Groundwater. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-19
2.4 Management of the Soil/Waste Mixture. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-20
2.4.1 Excavation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-20
2.4.2 Leave in Place. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-21
2.4. 3 Excavated Soil Treatment Option. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2�
2.5 Management of Contaminated Groundwater and Leachate. . . . . . . .2-29
2.5.1 Extraction or Containment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.25
2.5.2 Treatment or No Treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — - - - - . 2.23 -
2.5.3 Treatment/Disposal Options for Heavily
Contaminated Leachate From On-Site and
Immediately Below the Barrier Dam. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '-29
2.5.4 Remedial Actions For Moderately Contaminated
Groundwater Extracted from the Mid-Caavon Area. . . . _-30
2. 5.5 Treatment/Disposal Options for Lightly Contaminated
Groundwater Extracted from the Lower Canyon and
Community Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-31
2.5.6 Extraction Well Barriers Flow Volume. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-32
3 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH EVALUATICN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-_
3 . 1 Background. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-';
3. 2 Chemical Constituents of Concern ac the String'e'_1ov S1te. . 3-2
3. 3 Exposure Evaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-2
3. 3. 1 Passible Routes of Exposure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2
3 . 3. 2 Populations Exposed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
i
Table of Contents (cont'd)
Title 'aze
3.4 Toxicity and Exposure Evaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5 Environmental and Public Health Impacts of Specific
Technologies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-7
3.6 Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-7
4.0 COST ESTIMATES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-1
4. 1 General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-1
4.2 Individual Remedial Action Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .+-2
4.2.1 General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . .4-2
4.2.2 Cost of the Adit/Gallery System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-7
4.2.3 Cost of Dpgradient Extraccion Wells co Dewater
the On-Site Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.10
4.2.4 Cost of Improved Surface Water Management. . . . . . . . . . .4.10
4.2.5 Cost of Multi-layer Cap System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-12
4.2.6 Cost of Excavating Digable On-Site Contaminated
Soil. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.14
4.2.7 Cost of Transporting and Disposing Excavated
Material to an Off-Site Land Disposal Facility. . . .4.15
4.2.8. Cost for Neutralizing Excavated Material. . . . . . . . . . . .4.16
4.2.9 Cost of On-Site Incineration of Excavated
Material. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-16
4-2.10 Cost of Solidification/Fixation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-18
4.2. 11 Cost of Redisposal of Excavated and Treated
Material at an On-Site Facility Meeting RCRA -
Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-19
4.2-12 Cost of Redisposal of Excavated and Treated
Material at an On-Site Facility With a Single
Liner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-20
4.2.13 Cost of a Mid-Canyon Extraction Well Barrier. . . . . . . .+ 21
4.2. 14 Cost of a Lower Canyon Extraction Well Berner
4.2.15 Cost of Downgradient Reinjection »ells. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2. 16 Cost of Flow Equalization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21-
4.2.17 Cost of Lime Precipitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .—2-
4.2. 18 Cost of Rotating Biological Contactors. . . . . . . . . . . . . .--_=
4.2.19 Cost of Air Stripping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.20 Cost of Activated Carbon Contact Beds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . -
4.2.21 Cost of Reverse Osmosis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --_°
4.2. 22 Cost of PACT TM Treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- - _
4.2.23 Cost for POTW Sewer Line Disposal. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .
4.2.24 Cost of Solar Evaporation Ponds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.25 Cost of Disposal of Liquids to Off-Site
RCRA Permitted Facility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-37,
4,2.26 Cost of Discharge of Treated Liquids co Surface
Waters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'+-39
4.2.27 Costs for Monicoring, Sampling, and Analysis. . . . . . . .4-39
.� ii
Table of Contents (conc'd)
Title aze �,.•
5.0 COST OF TECHNOLOGY COMBINATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
5.1 Purpose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1
5.2 Required Downgradient Remedial Action. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-1
5.2.1 Extraction Well Barriers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-1
5.2.2 Management of Groundwater From the Mid-Canyon
Extraction Well Barrier. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-2
5.2.3 Management of Groundwater From Lower Canyon
and Community Extraction Well Barriers. . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6
5.3 On-site Remedial Actions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-10
5.3.1 Management of Heavily Contaminated Leachate
Extracted From the Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5.10
5.3.2 Dewatering of the Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-15
5.3.3 Management of On-Site Contaminated Soil. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-16
6.0 REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE SELECTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6.1
6.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6.1
6.2 Development of Remedial Alternatives of Downgradient
Plume Management as a Constant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
6.3 Downgradient Plume Management Options. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-10
6.4 No Action Alternative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-15
6.5 Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.15
APTENDICES
A A Preliminary Estimate of Stringfellow Site Excavacior.
Volume. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A- 1
B Community Soils Characterization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
C Objectives and Scandards/Criteria for Stringfellow Sae
Clean-Up. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .C-1
0 Possible Methodology to Determine Soil Contaminant Levels
to Meet Clean-Up Criteria at the Stringfellow Size. . . . . . . . . ]- _
E Estimated Contaminant Removal Efficiencies of Treatment
Technologies When Applied to Stringfellow Wastewater
Screams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-1
F Estimated Air Emissions From Solar Evaporation Ponds a-
Stringfellow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F- '.
G Bibliography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1
iii
List of Figures
Title tea-=
.r
ES-1 Schematic Diagram of Feasibility Study Process and Its
Relationship to This Status Report, and the Project
Contract Task Numbers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-3
ES-2 Technology Combination Flowchart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-5
1.1 Schematic Diagram of Feasibility Study Process and Its
Relationship to This Status Report, and the Project
Contract Task Numbers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5
2-1 Schematic Diagram of Broad General Options Potentially Used
to Manage Stringfellow Waste Streams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2
02 Specific Options for Management of Uncontaminated Upgradient
Groundwater. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-7
2-3 Details of Specific Options for Management of Wastes and
Contaminated Soils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-8
2-4 Specific Options for Management of Contaminated Groundwater. . . . 2-9
2.5 Technology Combination Flowchart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-10
2-6 Treatment and Disposal Options for Heavily Contaminated Ground-
water From an On-Site Adit System or Extraction Wells. . . . . . . . 2-15
2-7 Treatment and Disposal Options for Moderately Contaminated
Groundwater From the Plume in the Mid-Canvon Area. . . . . . . . . . . . 2-16
2-8 Treatment and Disposal Options for Lightly Contaminated
Groundwater From the Plume in the Mid-Canyon Area. . . . . . . . . . . . 2-'_7
3-1 Location of Wells Selected as Representing Average Contaminant
Concentrations for Mid-Canyon, Lower Canyon, and Community. . . . . 3-6
APPENDICES
A-1 Approximate Surface Areas of Site Areas Delineated in this
Calculation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-2
B-1 Location of Soil Sampling Zones Along 'Pyrite Channel. . . . . . . . . . . 3-2
F.1 Effect of Molecular Weight and Environmental Characteristics
on Liquid-Phase Exchange Coefficient. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-3
F-2 Effect of Molecular Weight, Wind Speed and Current on Gas-Phase
Exchange Coefficient. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-4
iv
List of Figures
Title pa-e
F-3 Solubility, Vapor Pressure and Henry's Law Constant for Se'_ec=ec
Chemicals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F
v
List of Tables
Title 'aze
ES-1 Summary of Total Capital, Annual O6.M, and 30 Year Present
Worth Costs for General Remedial Alternatives Including
Downgradient Extraction and Management. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-'i2
1-1 Short and Long-Term Clean-Up Objectives for Stringfellow. . . . . . . 1-3
2-1 Candidate Remedial Technologies Remaining After Initial
Technical Feasibility Screening. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2--
2.2 Technologies Eliminated from Further Consideration for Use
at Stringfellow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-11
2.3 Remedial Action Technology Chart. . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-14
2-4 Assumed Flow Volumes from Extraction Well Harriers Under
Present Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-33
3-1 Summary of Potential Environmental and Public Health
Impacts of Technologies at the Stringfellow Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
4-1 Cost Summary of Various Remedial Actions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4-2 Estimated Capital Cost of the Adit/Gallery System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . +-3
4-3 Estimated 0 & H Cost of the Adit/Gallery System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +-3 -
4-4 Assumed Effect of a Site Dewatering System (Gallery or
Extraction Wells) Installation On Future Quantity and
Quality of On-Sice Leachace and Dowrgradient Extracted
Groundwater. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +-?
4-5 Estimate of Capital Costs for Upgradient Extraction +ells. . . . . .
4.6 Estimate of Annual O&M Cost for Upgradient Extraction
4-7 Estimated Capital and Annual O&M Costs for a Multi-layered
CapSystem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4-8 Estimated Capital Cost of Neutralization of Excavated
Material On-Sice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4-9 Estimated Capital and OM Costs for Operation of Mid-Canyon
Extraction Wells. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-22
4-10 Estimated Capital and 0&M Costs for the Installation of a
Lower Canyon Extraction Well Barrier. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +-21
vi
List of Tables (cont'd)
Title 'aze
4.11 Estimated Capital and O&K Costs for the Installation of a
Lower Canyon Extraction Well Barrier and Pumping to the
Mid-Canyon. .: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.22
4-12 Estimated Capital and O&K Costs for the Installation of
Downgradient Reinjection Wells. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.23
4-13 Estimated Capital Costs for Flow Equalization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.24
4-14 Estimated Operation and Maintenance Costs for Flow
Equalization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-25
4.15 Estimated Capital Costs for Lime Precipitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-25
4-16 Estimated Operation and Maintenance Costs for Lime
Precipitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-26
4-17 Estimated Capital Costs for Rotating Biological Contactors. . . . . 4-27
4-18 Estimated O&M Costs for Rotating Biological Contactor
Treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-27
4-19 Estimated Capital Costs for Air Stripping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-28
4-20 Estimated O6H Costs for Air Stripping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-29
4-21 Estimated Capital Costs for Granular Activated Carbon
Treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-30
4-22 O&M Cost Estimate for Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. . . . . . +-30
4-23 Estimated Capital Costs for Reverse Osmosis Treatment. . . . . . . . . . 4-32
4.24 Estimated O&M Costs for Reverse Osmosis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-32
4.25 Estimated Capital Costs for PACT Treatment Svstem. . . . . . . . . . . . 4-33
4-26 Estimated O&M Costs for PACT Treatment System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3'
4-27 Estimated Capital and O&H Costs for Disposal to the SARI
Line (From Extraction Well Barrier Area) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-35
4-28 Estimated Capital and O&M Costs for Disposal to the SARI
Line (From Mid-Canyon Treatment Plant Area) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.36
4.29 Capital Cost Estimate or Solar Evaporation Ponds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.38
4.30 O&M Cost Estimate for Solar Evaporation Ponds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.38
vii
List of Tables (cont'd)
Title 'a-a
4-31 Estimated Capital and OSM Costs for Liquid Disposal to a RCZi
Permitted Facility (From Extraction Well Barrier Area) . . . . . . . n .0
4-32 Estimated Capital and O6.M Costs for Liquid Disposal to a RCR.-1
Permitted Facility (From :Sid-Canyon Treatment Plant Area) . . . . +-+-
4-33 Estimated Capital Costs for Discharge of Treated Liquids to
Surface Waters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2
4-34 Estimated Operation and Maintenance Costs for Discharging
Treated Effluent to Surface Waters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-42
5-1 Extraction Well Barrier Flow Output and Selected Quality
Parameters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3
5-2 Estimated Costs for Technically Feasible Treatment and
Disposal Combinations for 20 gpm of Extracted Groundwater
From :Sid-Canyon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5
5-3 Estimated Costs for Technically Feasible Treatment and
Disposal Combinations for 100 gpm of Extracted Groundwater
From the Lower Canyon or Community. . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5-4 Estimated Costs for Technically Feasible Treatment and
... Disposal Combinations for Constant 20 gpm of On-Site
Leachers, Assumes Site is 'lot Dewatered. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-11
5-5 Estimated Costs for Technically Feasible Treatment and
Disposal Options for On-Site Leachate Produced by
Dewatering the Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-13
5-6 Comparison of Site Dewatering Costs by Two Methods. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-:5
5-7 Estimated Costs for Technically Feasible Treatment and
Disposal Combinations for Management of On-Site
Contaminated Soils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5- :-
6-1 Cost Range of Downgradienc Groundwater Management
Technology Combinations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3
6-2 Cost of Typical Remedial Alternative Involving Extractior.
and Treatment of a Constant 20 gpm From On-Site Wells (-"o
Dewatering) With Downgradienc Groundwater Extraction and
Management. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6-3 Cost of Typical Remedial Alternative Involving Installation
of Adit/Gallery System. Recapping of On-Site Area, and
Downgradient Groundwater Extraction and Management. . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
viii
List of Tables (cont'd)
Title 'aze-
6.4 Cost of Typical Remedial Alternative Involving On-Sice
Excavation Followed by On-Site RCRA Type Disposal With
Downgradient Groundwater Extraction and Management. . . . .. . . . . . 6-6
6-5 Cost of Typical Remedial Alternative Involving On-Site
Excavation Followed by Neutralization, Incineration, and
Redisposal to an On-Site RCRA Type Facility With
Downgradient Groundwater Extraction and Management. . . . . . . . . 6
6-6 Cost of Typical Remedial Alternative involving On-Site
Excavation, Followed by Off-Site RCRA Site Disposal With
Downgradient Groundwater Extraction and Management. . . . . . . . . . . 6.8
6-7 Summary of Total Capital, Annual 0&M, and 30 Year Present
Worth Costs for General Remedial Alternatives Including
Downgradient Extraction and Management. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6.9
6-8 Cost of Downgradient Portion of Typical Remedial
Alternative (Disposal Option 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-11
6-9 Cost of Downgradienc Portion of Typical Remedial
Alternative (Disposal Option 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-12
6.10 Cost of Downgradient Portion of Typical Remedial
Alternative (Disposal Option 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-13
6-11 Cost of Downgradient Portion of Typical Remedial
Alternative (Disposal Option 4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . m. . . . . . . . . . . . 6-14
A21901DICES
A-1 Estimated Excavation Volumes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-3
A-2 Core Analysis Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-5
A-3 Average Thickness of Units (ft) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-6
3-1 Community Soils Investigation Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
C-1 Clean-Up Objectives for Stringfellow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 02
C-2 Standards and Criteria Applicable to Stringfellow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-4
C-3 National and State Ambient Air Quality Standards (April 1985) . C-11
C-4 Threshold Limits for Discharges in the South Coast Air Quality
Management District. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-12
ix
List of Tables (conc'd)
Title ?aze
D-1 Preliminary Input Values and Restoration Criteria for
Stringfellow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-3
D-2 Estimated Soil Ingestion by Age Group. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-4
E-1 Stringfellow Site Contaminated Groundwater Quality. . . . . . . . . . . . . E-2
E-2 Estimated Contaminant Removal Efficiencies of Treatment
Technologies from Highly Contaminated Groundwater. . . . . . . . . . . . E-3
E-3 Estimated Contaminant Removal Efficiencies of Various Treatmerz
Technologies from Moderately Contaminated Groundwater. . . . . . . . E-4
E-4 Contaminant Removal Efficiencies of Various Treatment
Technologies from Lightly Contaminated Groundwater. . . . . .. . . . . E-5
E-5 Selected Discharge Quality Requirements for Specific Disposa-'
Options. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-7
F-1 Volatilization Parameters for Selected Chemicals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-5
F-2 Volatilization Rates of Pollutants From a Lagoon. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . F-S
F-3 Concentration of Contaminants in Typical Groundwaters from Lover
`—' Canyon and Mid-Canyon, Plus Streams and A and 3 Mixture. . . . . . F-IC -
F-4 Method 2: Determination of Air Quality Criteria from OHS
Criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :.13
F-5 Emission Concentrations from Solar Evaporation During Torsz
Case (Radiation Inversion) and Normal Teacher Conditions. . . . .
x
_ RE : AGENDA JEM NO, 15 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
0 ORANGE COUNTY, CAOFORNIA
P.0 Box 81V
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 8272a-8127
108.MIS AVENUE
July 2, 1986 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
n141 5462810
91419624411
Long-Term Debt Financing Program Update
At the June 11th meeting of the Joint Boards, the Districts' financial and
legal consultants made a presentation to the Directors regarding implementation
of a long-term debt financing program prior to September 1, 1986. Director
Peer Swan had recommended that the Boards consider this type of capital financing
to take advantage of currently favorable tax laws that are proposed to be changed
on September 1 by Congress. The primary reasons for considering use of bonds or
similar securities such as certificates of participation for capital construction
financing at this time are to:
- Preserve existing capital reserves for long-term construction
requirements such as construction of full secondary treatment at
Plant No. 2 (estimated cost: $285 million if constructed between 1990
and 1995) in the event the Districts' existing NPDES permit is not
extended by EPA in 1990, and other long-term facilities construction
projects totaling an additional $383 million over the next ten years.
- Allow the Districts to continue to invest their existing capital reserves
in the County commingled investment pool managed by the County Treasurer
.,� and benefit from the favorable spread between investment returns and the
potentially lower rate of interest paid for the securities.
- Take advantage of currently favorable tax laws and low capital market
interest rates that might be financially beneficial to the Districts.
- Provide a source of capital financing potentially needed to meet
long-term Joint Works construction and trunk sewer system construction
requirements and necessary capital replacement reserves.
Tax reform legislation pending before Congress may change the structure and
limit or change the tax benefits currently available to municipal bond investors.
Should the legislation be approved by the Congress and signed into law by the
President this year, existing language in the House version of the bill
establishes September 1, 1986 as the effective date of the proposed legislative
changes. Thus, unfortunately, proceedings have had to be instituted on a very
short time schedule in order to be able to take advantage of existing law.
Following preliminary consideration at the June 11th meeting, seven of the
nine Districts (Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 14) directed the consultants and
staff to proceed with planning, development and implementation of a long-term
debt financing program utilizing tax exempt certificates of participation.
Districts 11 and 13 elected not to proceed with debt financing and the bond
counsel has subsequently ruled that District No. 7 is ineligible at this time.
-1-
The Boards of Districts 2 and 3 met on January 19th and directed the
consultants to proceed with a fixed interest rate financing package for their
respective Districts. The Boards of Districts 5, 6, and 14 are also considering
meeting prior to the regular Joint Board Meeting on July 9th to further review
long-term debt financing for their respective Districts.
At their meeting on June 25th, the Executive and Fiscal Policy Committees
discussed at considerable length the relative merits of fixed versus variable
interest rates and negotiated versus competitive sale of the certificates of
participation. (See separate Executive Committee Report dated July 1, 1986)
A fixed interest rate issue can be sold via either a competitive or a negotiated
sale. In a negotiated sale, an underwriter would be selected to work with the
Districts and our advisors to structure the issue. The selected underwriter
would then present the Districts with a purchase agreement based on the terms
that had been negotiated. In a competitive sale, the Districts and our advisors
structure the issue, prepare an official statement describing the issue and the
Districts, secure ratings, and actively market the issue to a wide variety of
underwriting firms. The Districts' Boards would then adopt a notice of sale,
which is the official advertisement for the issue. At a given place and time,
sealed bids would be received from underwriters and the sale would then be
awarded to the underwriter bidding the lowest net interest cost. Variable
interest rate securities can only be issued through a negotiated sale.
The Executive Committee and the Fiscal Policy Committee have recommended
that those Districts electing to proceed with long-term, tax exempt debt
financing for capital construction projects, issue their certificates of
participation on a competitive sale basis. (This would preclude variable
interest rate financing and the need to select an underwriter)
On June 13th and 20th, reports with additional financial projections and
debt financing information were mailed to the Directors. Enclosed herewith for
those Districts still considering long-term debt financing is cash flow
information prepared by Bartle Wells reflecting the projected fiscal condition
with and without the proposed issuance of certificates of participation and
assuming various interest rates; and a graphic representation of projected
requirements and fund balances with and without debt financing, prepared by
staff.
The financial consultant will review the information with the Directors at
the next Board meeting and, along with the bond counsel , will review the documents
and the final procedures and schedule that the Boards which elect to proceed will
have to follow to effect a sale of certificates of participation by the deadline.
The following actions will be necessary.
(1) Determination of whether to proceed or not to proceed with
issuance of Certificates of Participation in an amount
recommended by the financial consultant.
(2) Determination of issuance of Certificates of Participation
on a competitive sale/fixed-interest rate basis, as recommended
by the Executive Committee.
-2-
(3) Consideration of Resolution No. 86-84, approving the form
of and authorizing the execution and delivery of an Acquisition
- and Construction Agreement for Joint Facilities, an Assignment
Agreement, a Trust Agreement and a Notice Inviting Bids;
`-' approving and authorizing the execution and delivery of an
Official Statement; approving the sale of Certificates of
Participation by a trustee in payments made by the Districts
pursuant to said Acquisition and Construction Agreement for
Joint Facilities; and authorizing certain other matters
relating thereto.
The resolution prepared by bond counsel delegates authority to modify and
execute documents, as necessary, and award sale within certain parameters
- if the interest rate does not exceed % and the discount does not exceed
% - to be established by the Boards_
A draft of the Notice Inviting Bids is attached hereto. The financial
consultant and bond counsel will review it and the other documents described in
Resolution No. 86-84 at the meeting. A copy of Resolution No. 86-84 is attached
to the agenda supporting documents referenced under Agenda Item No. (15) (d) (3).
Notwithstanding the above mentioned delegation authority, it is recommended
that the Boards adjourn to July 30th to take any final actions and to award sale
of the certificates.
If any Director has any questions prior to the Board meeting please call
Bill Butler, Director of Finance, at (714) 962-2411, extension 240.
-3-
DISTRICT 1 : ALL FUNDS
YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS -
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER) -
JUNE 27, 1986
40 - TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITH FINANCING)
-0- TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
--*-- CASH BALANCE (WITH FINANCING)
-O- CASH BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
30
w 20 ^
c
10
\�� \
J
O
0
1986-87 1988-89lc�\ 199�r-91 1995-96
( 10)
(20) \
(30) \
v
(40)
DISTRICT 1 : CAPITAL FUNDS
�.s YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER)
JUNE 27, 1986
40 _g_ TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
-$- CASH BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
30
w 20
c
0
E
y
ir 10
\/J
J
0
0 b
1986-87 1988-89, 1990-91 1995-96
a
( 10) \ 0.
(20) \ �
(30)
(40)
DISTRICT 1 : OPERATING FUNDS
YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS _
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER)
JUNE 27, 1986
40 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
_-_ CASH BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
30
w 20
c
0
E
U)
tc 10
� J
J
— _0— __ _ _ O_ _ __ -0-- \ \
0 _ Z
1986-87 1988-89 1990-91 �V95-96
( 10)
(20)
(30)
(40)
DISTRICT 2 : ALL FUNDS
YEAR -TO - YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT / JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES ( WITH WAIVER )
JUNE 27, 1986
REVISED
300
- - - ENDING FUND BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING:;)
--o - JOINT WORKS COSTS
250 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
�- TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITH FINANCING)
ENDING FUND BALANCE (WITH FINANCING)
c
0
200
E
y
cr
150
J
O
0
100
50 � \
1986 -87 1988 -89 1990- 91 \ �2, 199 - 96
— ( 50 ) \ \
DISTRICT 2 : CAPITAL FUNDS
YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/ JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCE ( WITH WAIVER)
60 JUNE 27, 1986
REVISED
-- - ENDING FUND BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
- DISTRICT COLLECTION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
50 \
40
y \
c
0
E �\
rn 3 0 \
J
0
0 �
20 \
\
10
0
1986-87 1988 -89 1990-91 2_ ,1995-96
(10)
DISTRICT 2 : OPERATING FUNDS
YEAR-TO- YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCE ( WITH WAIVER )
JUNE 27, 1986 _
REVISED
120
- - - ENDING FUND BALANCE
100 —0- - JOINT WORKS O & M COSTS
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
_ 80
N
C
O
E 60
rn
J
O
40
0
20
0
1986 -87 1988 - 89 — —1-9-9-0 -91 _ — 1995 - P6
( 20 )
( 40 )
DISTRICT 3: ALL FUNDS
YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/ JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCE ( WITH WAIVER )
JUNE 27. 1986
160
REVISED
- - -ENDING FUND BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
140 O JOINT WORKS COSTS
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
=TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITH FINANCING)
120 ENDING FUND BALANCE (WITH FINANCING,'
100
y 80
c
0
E 60
U)
40
J \
O
20
0 --
1986-87 1988-89 \�1990-91 1995 -96
(20)
\
(40) \
\y
h
(60)
DISTRICT 3 : CAPITAL FUNDS
YEAR—TO—YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/ JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCE ( WITH WAIVER)
JUNE 27. 1986 _
REVISED
- - - ENDING FUND BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
REQUIREMENTS
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
50
40 \
\
30 \
N \
° 20 \
E
v \
U) 10 \ \
cc \
Q
J 0 \
O
0 1986 -87 1988-89 \1990-91 1995-96
(10) \
(20) \
(30)
(40)
(50)
DISTRICT 3 : OPERATING FUNDS
YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCE ( WITH WAIVER )
JUNE 27, 1986
160 REVISED -
140 - - - ENDING FUND BALANCE
-ti.- JOINT WORKS 08M COSTS
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
120
100
80
N
C
O
- 60
E
40
J
J
0
0 20
0
1986I -87 1988-89- 1990-91 1995-96
(20) y
(40) \
\
(60)
DISTRICT 5 : ALL FUNDS
YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER)
JUNE 27. 1986
40 -0 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITH FINANCING)
--o- TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
- Al, CASH BALANCE (WITH FINANCING)
--0- CASH BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
30
N 20 �
i
c i i
¢ 10
_j -
J
O
0
1986-87 1988-89 1990-91 1995-96
( 10)
(20)
(30)
(40)
DISTRICT 5: CAPITAL FUNDS
YEAR—TO—YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER) -
JUNE 27, 1986
40 - -0— TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
—0— CASH BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
30
w 20
c
0
E
co T 10 - - 0— O_
J
0 _
0
1986-87 1988-89 1990-91 — 1995-96
( 10)
(20)
(30)
(40)
DISTRICT 5 : OPERATING FUNDS
YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER)
JUNE 27, 1986
40 -0- TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
--O-- CASH BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
30
w 20
C /
O 0
E
U) /N
¢ 10 /
Q J/
O _ _0 - o-
0
1966-87 1988-89 1990-91 1995-96
( 10)
(20)
(30)
(40)
DISTRICT 6 : ALL FUNDS
YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER)
JUNE 27, 1986
40 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITH FINANCING)
—o- TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
--40-- CASH BALANCE (WITH FINANCING)
- -0-- CASH BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
30
y 20
c
0
E
¢ 10
J
0
1986-87 1988-89 1990-91 -0'� -_ '*11,995-96
( 10)
(20)
(30)
(40)
DISTRICT 6 : CAPITAL FUNDS
YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL- DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER) _
JUNE 27, 1986
40 --0- TOTAL REQUIREMENTS ITHOUT
--3- CASH BALANCE (WITHOU�INANCING)A NCIN G)
30
y 20
c
0
E
x
¢ 10
J
O
0 'O,
1986-87 1988-89 1990=94 _0___ 1995-96
( 10)
(20)
(30)
(40)
DISTRICT 6 : OPERATING FUNDS
YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER)
JUNE 27, 1986
40 —0 - TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
- O - CASH BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
30
y 20
c
0
E
Ix 10
J
J
0
0
1986-87 1988-89 1990-91 1995-96
( 10)
(20)
(30)
(40)
DISTRICT14: ALL FUNDS
YEAR—TO—YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS -
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER)
JUNE 27, 1986
40 t TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITH FINANCING)
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
--*-- CASH BALANCE (WITH FINANCING)
-8- CASH BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
30
ti 20
c
0
E
cc
10
J _
O
O X �
0
1986-87 1988-89 1990-91 1995-96
( 10)
(20)
(30)
(40)
DISTRICT14: CAPITAL FUNDS
-� YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS -_
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER)
JUNE 27, 1986
40 --0-- TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
--0- CASH BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
30
y 20
c
0
¢ 10
� J
J
0
0 C _
1986-87 1988-89
0 0)
(20)
(30)
(40)
DISTRICT14: OPERATING FUNDS
YEAR-TO-YEAR COMPARISON OF ALL DISTRICT/JOINT WORKS
EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCES (WITH WAIVER)
JUNE 27, 1986
40 --o- TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT FINANCING)
--p-- CASH BALANCE (WITHOUT FINANCING)
30
w 20
c
0
E
¢ 10
J
J
0
0
1986-87 1988-89 1990-91 1995-96
( 10)
(20)
(30)
(40)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 CSDOCI WITH
CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW BARTLE WELLS WAIVER
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 7/1/86
1991/92-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 421 431 441 452 463 2,500
OTHER 2,803 127 25 1 , 173 58 1 , 711
TOTAL 3, 224 558 466 1 ,625 521 4,211
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 5, 019 4, 904 4,754 4, 693 4, 177 5, 762
DIST COLL 200 100 100 100 100 200
OPERATING FD DEF 0 0 792 2,350 4,237 19,546
OTHER 1 ,217 1, 218 1, 218 1 , 218 1,218
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,436 6, 222 6, 864 8,361 9, 732 25,508
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS, 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 5, 962
WITHOUT WAIVER: 36,343
"PAY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
STARTING BALANCE 6,705 3,493 (1,814) (8, 153) ( 14,889) (24, 100)
INTEREST EARNINGS 0 357 59 0 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 9,929 4,408 (1 , 289) (6, 528) ( 14, 368) (19,889)
BAL AFTER EXPENDITUR 3,493 (1,814) (8, 153) (14 ,889) (24, 100) (45, 397)
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 8% -
STARTING BALANCE 6, 705 22,934 15, 996 8,650 466 ( 11,055)
NET BOND PROCEEDS 20, 596 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 0 1. 037 1,363 863 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 30,525 24,529 17, 825 11, 138 987 (6, 844)
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 1, 155 2,311 2, 311 2, 311 2, 311 11 ,553
BAL AFTER EXPEND 22, 934 15,996 8, 650 466 (11 , 055) (43,906)
District No. 1
with waiver
Page 2
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 5.5%
STARTING BALANCE 6, 705 23, 170 16,712 9,871 2, 227 (8,399)
NET BOND PROCEEDS 20, 596 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 0 1,046 1, 396 930 423 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 30,525 24,773 18,574 12,427 3, 172 (4, 188)
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 919 1 , 839 1 ,839 1,839 1 , 839 9, 194
BAL AFTER EXPEND 23, 170 16, 712 9, 871 2, 227 (8, 399) (38, 890)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES, 7. 5%
STARTING BALANCE 6,705 22, 983 16. 145 8, 904 831 ( 10,592)
NET BOND PROCEEDS 20, 596 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 0 1, 039 1,369 877 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 30, 525 24,580 17, 980 11 ,405 1, 352 (6, 381)
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 1, 106 2, 213 2,213 2,213 2,213 11,064
HAL AFTER EXPEND 22, 983 16, 145 8, 904 831 (10,592) (42 , 953)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES , 9.5%
_______________________________________
STARTING BALANCE 6, 705 22, 782 15,537 7,866 (664) (12,489)
NET BOND PROCEEDS 20,596 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 0 1, 032 1 , 341 819 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 30,525 24, 372 17, 344 10, 310 (143) (8, 278)
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 1 , 307 2, 614 2, 614 2, 614 2, 614 13, 068
BAL AFTER EXPEND 22, 782 15,537 7, 866 (664) (12,489) (46,863)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 CSDOC2 WITH
CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW BARTLE WELLS WAIVER
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 7/1/86
1991/92-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 2, 020 2,091 2, 166 2,245 2, 329 13, 090
OTHER 6,496 67 67 3. 133 156 4 , 571
TOTAL 8,516 2. 158 2,233 5,378 2, 485 17, 661
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 13,409 13, 103 12, 702 12,538 11, 158 15, 394
DIST COLL 4 , 950 6,425 5,915 175 2 , 175 19. 350
OPERATING FD DEF 0 0 0 505 4, 007 37, 303
OTHER 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 18, 359 19, 528 18, 617 13, 218 17, 340 72, 047
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS, 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 34, 744
WITHOUT WAIVER: 115, 911
PAY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
STARTING BALANCE 60,977 55, 227 41, 924 28,940 23,581 10, 564
INTEREST EARNINGS 4, 093 4, 067 3,400 2,480 1 , 838 1 , 589
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 73,586 61,452 47,557 36, 799 27, 904 29, 814
BAL AFTER EXPENDITUR 55,227 41 , 924 28,940 23,581 10,564 (42, 233)
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES , 8%
______________________________________
STARTING BALANCE 60,977 90, 119 73, 716 58,744 51,218 35 , 890
NET BOND PROCEEDS 39, 214 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 4 . 093 5,288 5, 734 4,636 3,849 5, 765
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 112, 800 97,566 81,683 68, 758 57,552 59, 317
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 4, 322 4, 322 4,322 4, 322 4 , 322 21 , 609
BAL AFTER EXPEND 90, 119 73, 716 58, 744 51, 218 35, 890 (34, 339)
District No. 2
with waiver
Page 2
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 26 YRS, 5.5%
STARTING BALANCE 60,977 91,002 75,512 61,516 550033 40,818
NET BOND PROCEEDS 39,214 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 4,093 5,319 6,828 4,796 4, 079 8. 275
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 112, 800 98,479 83,573 71 ,690 61 ,697 66,754
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 3,439 3,439 3,439 3,439 3,439 17, 196
SAL AFTER EXPEND 91 ,002 75,512 61 ,516 55, 033 40, 818 (22,489)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 7.5%
STARTING BALANCE 60,977 90, 302 74 , 088 59,319 52,010 36,913
NET BOND PROCEEDS 39,214 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 4, 093 5, 295 5,754 4,669 3,897 6,904
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 112,800 97,755 82,075 69,366 58, 391 61,477
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 4, 139 4, 139 4, 139 4, 139 4, 139 20,694
BAL AFTER EXPEND 90,302 74,088 59,319 52, 010 36, 913 (31,263) `--
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 9.5%
STARTING BALANCE 60,977 89,553 72,563 56,965 48,770 32,727
NET BOND PROCEEDS 39, 214 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 4, 093 5, 269 5. 674 4, 533 3, 701 5,566
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 112, 800 96, 979 80,470 66,876 54, 955 55, 954
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 4,888 4, 888 4,888 4, 888 4,888 24,442
SAL AFTER EXPEND 89, 553 72,563 56,965 48, 770 32, 727 (40,535)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 CSDOC3 WITH
CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW BARTLE. WELLS WAIVER
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 7/1/86
1991/29-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 1,056 1, 084 1 , 113 1 , 144 1, 177 6, 453
OTHER 6, 816 72 72 3, 394 170 5 , 264
TOTAL 7,872 1, 156 1 , 185 4,538 1, 347 11 , 717
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 14,524 14, 193 13, 759 13,582 12, 087 16, 674
DIST COLL 1, 990 3 , 300 3,510 1 , 800 4 , 850 600
OPERATING FD DEF 0 454 3,463 7,512 12, 752 61 , 132
OTHER 2,992
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 19, 506 17,947 20, 732 22, 894 29,689 78, 406
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS, 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 17, 274
WITHOUT WAIVER: 105, 197
PAY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
STARTING BALANCE 55, 635 47, 689 34,514 17,844 1 , 321 (26, 350)
INTEREST EARNINGS 3,688 3, 616 2, 877 1, 833 671 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 67, 195 52,461 38, 576 24,215 3, 339 (14 , 633)
NET AFTER EXPENDITUR 47,689 34,514 17, 844 1, 321 (26,350) (93,039)
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 8%
STARTING BALANCE 55, 635 85,484 68,951 50, 127 31 , 258 1 , 083
NET BOND PROCEEDS 42,476 0 0 0 0 0 _
INTEREST EARNINGS 3,688 4,939 5 ,405 4 , 168 2,848 1 , 132
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 109, 671 91,579 75,541 58, 833 35,453 13, 932
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 4,681 4, 681 4,681 4,681 4, 681 23 ,407
BAL AFTER EXPEND 85,484 68,951 50, 127 31, 258 1,083 (87,881)
District No. 3
with waiver
Page 2
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES , 5.5%
STARTING BALANCE 55,635 86,440 70,896 63, 130 35, 390 6,421
NET BOND PROCEEDS 42,476 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 3. 688 4, 973 5,507 4,341 3,098 1 ,463
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 109, 671 92,568 77,588 62,009 39, 835 19, 601
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 3,725 3, 725 3,725 3,725 3,725 18,627
SAL AFTER EXPEND 86,440 70, 896 53, 130 35,390 6,421 (77,432)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 7.5%
STARTING BALANCE 55, 635 85,682 69,354 50, 750 32, 115 2, 190
NET BOND PROCEEDS 42,476 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 3,688 4,946 5,426 4,204 2,900 1 ,201
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 109,671 91, 784 75, 965 59,492 36, 362 15, 108
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 4,483 4,483 4,483 4,483 4,483 22,415
BAL AFTER EXPEND 85,682 69,354 50, 750 32, 115 2, 190 (85,713)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES, 9.5%
STARTING BALANCE 55,635 84, 870 67, 702 48, 200 28, 605
NET BOND PROCEEDS 42,476 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 3,688 4, 918 5, 340 4, 057 2, 688 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 109, 671 90, 944 74, 227 56, 794 32, 641 9, 374
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 5, 295 5, 295 5, 295 5, 295 5, 295 26,475
SAL AFTER EXPEND 84, 870 67, 702 48, 200 28, 605 (2, 343) (95,507)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 CSDOCS WITH
CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW BARTLE WELLS WAIVER
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 7/1/86
1991/92-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 371 433 1 , 134 966 966 3,750
OTHER 3, 624 1, 913 163 1, 992 30 1,213
TOTAL 3, 995 2,346 1 ,297 2, 958 996 4,963
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 2,533 2,476 2,399 2, 369 2, 108 2, 908
DIST COLL 1, 675 3, 325 3,625 1 ,325 2,675 450
OPERATING FD DEF 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER 61 111 883 722 722
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,269 5,912 6, 907 4,416 5,505 3,358
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS, 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 3,358
WITHOUT WAIVER: 18,691
PAY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
STARTING BALANCE 11, 102 11,550 8, 777 3,878 2,863 ( 1,410)
INTEREST EARNINGS 722 793 711 443 •236 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 15, 819 14,689 10, 785 7,279 4, 095 3,553
NET AFTER EXPENDITUR 11 ,550 8,777 3, 878 2, 863 ( 1,410) 195
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 8%
STARTING BALANCE 11, 102 18, 142 14, 783 9,509 8, 084 3,375 -
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7,408 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 722 1,024 1, 152 850 616 1,238
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 23, 227 21 ,511 17, 232 13, 317 9, 696 9,575
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 816 816 816 816 816 4,082
HAL AFTER EXPEND 18, 142 14, 783 9,509 8, 084 3, 375 2, 135
District No. 5
with waiver
Page 2
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS , S .SX
ccc==ec=-cc====cc.....ccecec=====cc.eo=-c=ccc=cccoc=c==eccccccccco=_c==a=c
STARTING BALANCE 11, 102 18,308 15, 122 10, 032 8,805 4, 306
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7,408 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 722 1,029 1, 170 880 659 1 ,690
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 23,227 21,684 17,589 13, 871 10,460 10,958
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 650 650 650 650 650 3, 249
BAL AFTER EXPEND 18, 308 15, 122 10, 032 8, 805 4.306 4, 352
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES, 7. 5%
STARTING BALANCE 11, 102 18, 176 14,853 9,617 8, 234 3,568
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7,408 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 722 1,025 1, 156 856 625 1 ,331
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 23, 227 21 ,547 17, 306 13 ,432 9,855 9,862
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 782 782 782 782 782 3,909
BAL AFTER EXPEND 18, 176 14,853 9,617 8, 234 3,568 2,595 ....
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES , 9.5%
___________________________________________________
_________________________________________
STARTING BALANCE 11 , 102 18,035 14,565 9, 172 7. 622 2,777
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7,408 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 722 1 ,020 1 , 141 831 588 948
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 23, 227 21,400 17,003 12, 961 9, 205 8, 688
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 923 923 923 923 923 4, 617
BAL AFTER EXPEND 18, 035 14 ,565 9, 172 7,622 2,777 712
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 CSDOC6 WITH
CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW BARTLE WELLS WAIVER
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 7/1/86
1991/92-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 1, 947 1, 196 548 424 297 780
OTHER 1 , 309 13 13 604 30 881
TOTAL 3, 256 1 , 209 561 1, 028 327 1 , 661
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 2,585 2,526 2,449 2,417 2, 151 2, 967
DIST COLL 450 150 350 1 , 100 300 2, 100
OPERATING FD DEF 0 0 0 0 0 1, 565
OTHER 1 ,034 0 0 0 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4, 069 2, 676 2, 799 3,517 2,451 6, 632
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS , 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 5, 067
WITHOUT WAIVER: 20 , 714
'AY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
STARTING BALANCE 4,063 3,523 2,322 288 (2, 110) (4, 234)
INTEREST EARNINGS 273 266 205 91 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 7,592 4, 998 3,087 1 ,407 (1, 783) (2, 573)
NET AFTER EXPENDITUR 3,523 2,322 288 (2, 110) (4, 234) (9,205)
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES, 8%
STARTING BALANCE 4, 063 10. 250 8, 451 6,034 3 , 219 585
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7,560 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 273 501 655 507 324 133
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 15, 152 11,960 9, 666 7,569 3, 869 2, 379
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 833 833 833 833 833 4, 166
BAL AFTER EXPEND 10, 250 8,451 6, 034 3, 219 585 (8,419)
District No. 6 '
with waiver
Page 2
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES , 5.5%
STARTING BALANCE 4,063 10,420 8,797 6,568 3, 954 1,535
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7,560 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 273 507 673 538 368 248
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 15, 152 12, 136 10,030 8, 134 4,649 3.445
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 663 663 663 663 663 3,315
SAL AFTER EXPEND 10,420 8, 797 6,568 3, 954 1,535 (6,503)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 7. 5%
STARTING BALANCE 4,063 10,285 8,522 6, 145 3, 371 782
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7,560 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 273 502 658 513 333 145
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 15, 152 11 ,996 9,742 7, 686 4,031 2,589
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 798 798 798 798 798 3,990
BAL AFTER EXPEND 10,285 8,522 6, 145 3, 371 782 (8,033) "
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES, 9. 5%
STARTING BALANCE 4,063 10, 141 8, 228 5,691 2, 747 (25)
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7,560 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 273 497 643 487 295 95
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 15, 152 11 ,847 9,432 7,206 3, 369 1 ,732 _
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 942 942 942 942 942 4, 712
BAL AFTER EXPEND 10, 141 8, 228 5,691 2, 747 (25) (9,612)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 CSDOCI4 WITH
CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW BARTLE WELLS WAIVER
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 7/1/86
1991/92-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 21,898 2, 343 2,781 4,490 5,318 2, 977
OTHER 255 14 14 669 34 1,009
TOTAL 22, 153 2, 357 2,795 5, 159 5, 352 3, 986
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 2,863 2,797 2,712 2,676 2, 382 3, 286
DIST COLL 2,200 200 700 3, 100 3, 100 700
OPERATING FD DEF 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER 17,266 64 84 107 135
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 22, 329 3, 061 3,496 5, 883 5, 617 3, 986
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS, 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 3, 986
WITHOUT WAIVER: 21,314
PAY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
STARTING BALANCE 464 321 (356) ( 1,057) (1 , 781) (2, 046)
INTEREST EARNINGS 33 27 0 0 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 22, 650 2. 705 2,439 4, 102 3,571 1,940
NET AFTER EXPENDITUR 321 (356) (1, 057) (1, 781) (2,046) (2, 046)
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES, 8%
STARTING BALANCE 464 7, 770 6,432 5, 305 4, 069 3, 210
NET BOND PROCEEDS 8, 372 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 33 288 497 411 328 754
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 31, 022 10,416 9,724 10,875 9, 749 7,950
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 923 923 923 923 923 4, 613
BAL AFTER EXPEND 7, 770 6,432 5,305 4, 069 3,210 (650)
District No. 14 .
with W vei
Page 2
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 5.5%
STARTING BALANCE 464 7,959 6,815 5,897 4,884 4, 262
NET BOND PROCEEDS 8, 372 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 33 295 517 445 377 1,265
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 31, 022 10,611 10, 127 11,501 10. 613 9,513
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 734 734 734 734 734 3, 671
DAL AFTER EXPEND 7, 959 6,815 5,897 4,884 4 , 262 1 , B55
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 7.5%
STARTING BALANCE 464 7,809 6,511 5,428 4,238 39428
NET BOND PROCEEDS 8,372 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 33 290 501 418 338 860
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 31 ,022 10,456 9, 808 11 ,005 99929 8,274
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 884 884 884 884 884 4,418 ...
DAL AFTER EXPEND 7,809 6,511 5,428 4, 238 3,428 (130)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 9.5%
STARTING BALANCE 464 7, 649 6, 186 4, 925 3, 547 2,534
NET BOND PROCEEDS 8,372 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 33 284 484 389 297 426
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 31 , 022 10,290 9,465 10,473 9, 195 6, 947
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 1 ,044 1,044 1 , 044 1 ,044 1,044 5, 218
DAL AFTER EXPEND 7, 649 6, 186 4, 925 3,547 2,534 (2,258)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 CSDOCI WITHOUT
CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW BARTLE WELLS WAIVER
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 7/1/86
1991/92-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 421 431 441 452 463 2, 500
OTHER 2,803 127 25 1 , 173 58 1 , 711
TOTAL 3, 224 558 466 1,625 521 4 , 211
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 5, 019 4, 904 4,754 4,693 4, 177 36, 143
DIST COLL 200 100 100 100 100 200
OPERATING FD DEF 0 0 792 2,350 4, 237 19, 546
OTHER 1 , 217 1, 218 1, 218 1, 218 1 , 218
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,436 6, 222 6, 864 8, 361 9, 732 55, 889
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS, 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 5, 962
WITHOUT WAIVER: 36, 343
,-.'AY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
STARTING BALANCE 6, 705 3 ,493 ( 1,814) (8, 153) (14, 889) (24 , 100)
INTEREST EARNINGS 0 357 59 0 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 9, 929 4,408 ( 1 , 289) (6,528) ( 14 , 368) ( 19, 889)
BAL AFTER EXPENDITUR 3,493 ( 1 , 814) (8, 153) (14, 889) (24 , 100) (75, 778)
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS , 8%
STARTING BALANCE 6, 705 22, 934 15, 996 8, 650 466 ( 11,055)
NET BOND PROCEEDS 20, 596 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 0 1 , 037 1, 363 863 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 30,525 24,529 17, 825 11, 138 987 (6, 844)
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 1, 155 2 , 311 2 , 311 2, 311 2, 311 11 , 553
BAL AFTER EXPEND 22, 934 15, 996 8, 650 466 ( 11 ,055) (74, 287)
r
District No. 1
without waiver
Page 2
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC : 25 YRS , 5. 5%
------------
STARTING BALANCE 6, 705 23 , 170 16, 712 9, 871 2, 227 (8, 399)
NET BOND PROCEEDS 20, 596 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 0 1 , 046 1, 396 930 423 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 30 , 525 24, 773 18, 574 12, 427 3 , 172 (4, 188)
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 919 1 , 839 1 , 839 1 , 839 1 , 839 9, 194
BAL AFTER EXPEND 23, 170 16, 712 9, 871 2, 227 (8, 399) (69, 271 )
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC : 25 YRS , 7. 5%
STARTING BALANCE 6, 705 22,983 16, 145 8, 904 831 ( 10,592)
NET BOND PROCEEDS 20,596 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 0 1, 039 1, 369 877 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 30, 525 24, 580 17, 980 11,405 1 , 352 (6, 381 )
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 1, 106 2 , 213 2 , 213 2, 213 2, 213 11 , 064
BAL AFTER EXPEND 22 , 983 16, 145 8, 904 831 ( 10 , 592) (73 , 334)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC : 25 YRS , 9.5%
STARTING BALANCE 6, 705 22 , 782 15,537 7 , 866 (664) ( 12 , 489)
NET BOND PROCEEDS 20 , 596 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 0 1 , 032 1 , 341 819 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 30,525 24 , 372 17, 344 10 , 310 (143) (8, 278)
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 1 , 307 2, 614 2, 614 2 , 614 2, 614 13 , 068
BAL AFTER EXPEND 22, 782 15,537 7 , 866 (664) ( 12, 489) (77, 234)
:OUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 CSDOC2 WITHOUT
CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW BARTLE WELLS WAIVER
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 7/1/86
1991/92-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 2,020 2,091 2, 166 2, 245 2,329 13, 090
OTHER 6,496 67 67 3, 133 156 4 , 571
TOTAL 8,516 2, 158 2, 233 5, 378 2,485 17, 661
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 13,409 13, 103 12, 702 12,538 11 , 158 96,561
DIST COLL 4, 950 6,425 5, 915 175 2, 175 19, 350
OPERATING FD DEF 0 0 0 505 4, 007 37, 303
OTHER 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 18, 359 19,528 18, 617 13,218 17, 340 153, 214
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS, 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 34,744
WITHOUT WAIVER: 115,911
PAY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
______________________________________________
STARTING BALANCE 60, 977 55, 227 41 , 924 28, 940 23,581 10 , 564
INTEREST EARNINGS 4, 093 4, 067 3,400 2,480 1 , 638 1 , 020
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 73,586 61,452 47,557 36, 799 27 , 904 29, 245
BAL AFTER EXPENDITUR 55, 227 41, 924 28, 940 23, 581 10, 564 (123, 969)
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 8%
_________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
STARTING BALANCE 60, 977 90, 119 73, 716 58, 744 51, 218 35 , 890
NET BOND PROCEEDS 39, 214 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 4, 093 5, 288 5, 734 4, 636 3, 849 (3 , 709)
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 112,800 97,566 81, 683 68, 758 57,552 49, 843
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 4, 322 4, 322 4, 322 _4 , 322 4, 322 21 , 609
BAL AFTER EXPEND 90, 119 73, 716 58, 744 51 , 218 35, 890 (124, 980)
District No. 2
without waiver
Page 2
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS , 5.5% ..�
STARTING BALANCE 60 , 977 91 , 002 75,512 61, 516 55, 033 40 , 818
NET BOND PROCEEDS 39, 214 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 4,093 5, 319 5 , 828 4, 796 4 , 079 3, 041
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 112, 800 98,479 83,573 71,690 61 , 597 61 , 520
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 3,439 3 ,439 3 , 439 3,439 3,439 17 , 196
BAL AFTER EXPEND 91 , 002 76,512 61 ,516 55 ,033 40, 818 ( 108, 890)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 7 . 5%
STARTING BALANCE 60, 977 90, 302 74 , 088 69, 319 52 , 010 36, 913
NET BOND PROCEEDS 39, 214 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 4, 093 5 , 295 5 , 754 4 , 669 3 , 897 1 , 670
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 112, 800 97,755 82 , 075 69, 366 58, 391 56, 244
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 4, 139 4 , 139 4, 139 4 , 139 4 , 139 20, 694
BAL AFTER EXPEND 90, 302 74, 08E 59, 319 52,010 36, 913 ( 117, 654)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS , 9. 5%
STARTING BALANCE 60, 977 89, 553 72, 563 56, 965 48, 770 32 , 727
NET BOND PROCEEDS 39, 214 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 4 , 093 50269 5 , 674 4,533 3,701 3 , 273
COTAL AVAIL FUNDS 112, 800 96, 979 80, 470 66, 876 54 ,955 53 , 661
kNNUAL DEBT SVC 4, 888 4, 888 4 , 688 4, 888 4 , 888 24 , 442
;AL AFTER EXPEND 89, 553 72,563 56, 965 48, 770 32, 727 ( 123, 994)
7OUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 CSDOC3 WITHOUT
-CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW BARTLE WELLS WAIVER
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 7/1/86
1991/29-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 1 , 056 1 , 084 1, 113 1, 144 1 , 177 6,453
OTHER 6,816 72 72 3 , 394 170 5, 264
TOTAL 7 , 872 1 , 156 1 , 185 4,538 1 , 347 11 , 717
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 14,524 14, 193 13, 759 13, 582 12 , 087 104 ,597
DIST COLL 1 , 990 3, 300 3,510 1, 800 4 , 850 600
OPERATING FD DEF 0 454 3,463 7 , 512 12, 752 61, 132
OTHER 2, 992
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 19,506 17, 947 20, 732 22 , 894 29, 689 166, 329
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS, 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 17, 274
WITHOUT WAIVER: 105, 197
PAY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
._---_____________________________________________________________________
STARTING BALANCE 55, 635 47, 689 34, 514 17 , 844 1 , 321 (26, 350)
INTEREST EARNINGS 3, 688 3, 616 2, 877 1 , 833 671 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 67, 195 52 ,461 38,576 24, 215 3, 339 ( 14, 633)
NET AFTER EXPENDITUR 47, 689 34, 514 17, 844 1 , 321 (26, 350) (180, 962)
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS , 8%
__________________________STARTING BALANCE 55, 635 85,484 68, 951 50, 127 31 , 258 1, 083
NET BOND PROCEEDS 42,476 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 3, 688 4 , 939 5,405 4, 168 2, 848 1 , 132
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 109, 671 91,579 75, 541 58, 833 35 ,453 13, 932
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 4, 681 4 , 681 4, 681 4, 681 4 , 681 23,407
BAL AFTER EXPEND 85 ,484 68, 951 50, 127 31 , 258 1 , 083 ( 175, 804)
District No. 3
without waiver
Page 2
I RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES, 5 . 5%
BALANCE 55, 635 66,440 70, 896 53 , 130 35, 390 6,421
PROCEEDS 42,476 0 0 0 0 0
f EARNINGS 3 , 688 4, 973 5,507 4 , 341 3 . 098 1 ,463
TAIL FUNDS 109,671 92 ,568 77,588 62 , 009 39, 835 19, 601
)EST SVC 3, 725 3, 725 3, 725 3, 725 3, 725 18, 627
3R EXPEND 86,440 70,896 53, 130 35, 390 6,421 ( 165 , 355)
3 RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES, 7. 5%
3 BALANCE 55,635 85 , 682 69, 354 50 , 750 32, 115 2, 190
) PROCEEDS 42,476 0 0 0 0 0
f EARNINGS 3,688 4 , 946 5 ,426 4, 204 2, 900 1 , 201
JAIL FUNDS 109, 671 91 , 784 75,965 59, 492 36, 362 15, 108
)EBT SVC 4,483 4 ,483 4,483 4,483 4 , 483 22,415
3R EXPEND 85 , 682 69, 354 50, 750 32 , 115 2, 190 (173, 636)
3 RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 9. 5%
3 BALANCE 55 , 635 84, 870 67 , 702 48, 200 28, 605 (2, 343)
) PROCEEDS 42,476 0 0 0 0 0
C EARNINGS 3, 688 4 , 918 5, 340 4 , 057 2, 688 0
TAIL FUNDS 109,671 90, 944 74 , 227 56, 794 32 , 641 9, 374
)EBT SVC 5 ,295 5, 295 5, 295 5 , 295 5 , 295 26,475
3R EXPEND 84, 870 67, 702 48, 200 28, 605 (2, 343) (183,430)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 CSD0C5 WITHOUT
CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW BARTLE WELLS WAIVER
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 7/1/86
1991/92-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 371 433 1 , 134 966 966 3, 750
OTHER 3, 624 1,913 163 1 , 992 30 1 , 213
TOTAL 3 , 995 2, 346 1, 297 2, 958 996 4, 963
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 2, 533 2,476 2, 399 2, 369 2 , 108 18,241
DIST COLL 1 . 675 3, 325 3,625 1 , 325 2 , 675 450
OPERATING FD DEF 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER 61 111 883 722 722
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4, 269 5, 912 6, 907 4,416 5, 505 18, 691
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS , 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 3, 358
WITHOUT WAIVER: 18, 691
PAY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
STARTING BALANCE 11 . 102 11,550 8, 777 3 , 878 2, 863 (1,410)
INTEREST EARNINGS 722 793 711 443 236 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 15, 819 14 , 689 10 ,785 7, 279 4, 095 3,553
NET AFTER EXPENDITUR 11 , 550 8, 777 3, 878 2, 863 (1 ,410) (15, 138)
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS , 8%
STARTING BALANCE 11 , 102 18, 142 14, 783 9, 509 8, 084 3, 375
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7,408 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 722 1, 024 1 , 152 850 616 (552)
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 23, 227 21,511 17, 232 13, 317 9, 696 7,786
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 816 816 816 816 816 4,082
BAL AFTER EXPEND 16, 142 14, 783 9, 509 8, 084 3, 375 ( 14,988)
District No. 5
withwt waives
Page 2
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS , 5 .5% �.
STARTING BALANCE 11 , 102 18, 308 15 , 122 10 , 032 8, 805 4, 306
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7,408 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 722 1 , 029 1 , 170 880 659 (100)
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 23, 227 21 , 684 17,589 13 , 871 10,460 9, 168
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 650 650 650 650 650 3 , 249
BAL AFTER EXPEND 18, 308 15 , 122 10 , 032 8, 805 4 , 306 ( 12, 771)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS , 7.5%
STARTING BALANCE 11 , 102 18, 176 14 , 853 9,617 8, 234 3 ,568
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7,408 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 722 1 ,025 1 , 156 856 625 (458)
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 23, 227 21, 547 17, 306 13,432 9, 855 8,072
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 782 782 782 782 762 3,909
BAL AFTER EXPEND 18, 176 14, 853 9, 617 8, 234 3 , 568 (14,528)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 9. 5%
-------------------------------------
STARTING BALANCE 11, 102 18, 035 14,565 9, 172 7, 622 2, 777
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7, 408 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 722 1 , 020 1 , 141 831 588 (842)
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 23, 227 21 ,400 17, 003 12, 961 9, 205 6, 898
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 923 � 923 923 923 923 4 ,617
BAL AFTER EXPEND 18, 035 14 , 565 9, 172 7, 622 2, 777 ( 16,410)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 CSDOC6 WITHOUT
CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW BARTLE WELLS WAIVER
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 7/1/86
1991/92-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 1 . 947 1 , 196 548 424 297 780
OTHER 1 , 309 13 13 604 30 881
TOTAL 3, 256 1 , 209 561 1 , 028 327 1 , 661
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 2,585 2,526 2,449 2,417 2, 151 18,614
DIST COLL 450 ISO 350 1 , 100 300 2 , 100
OPERATING FD DEF 0 0 0 0 0 1 , 565
OTHER 1 . 034 0 0 0 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4, 069 2,676 2, 799 3, 517 2, 451 22, 279
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS, 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 5, 067
WITHOUT WAIVER: 20 , 714
PAY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
__________________________________________________________________________
STARTING BALANCE 4, 063 3, 523 2, 322 288 (2, 110) (4, 234)
INTEREST EARNINGS 273 266 205 91 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 7 , 592 4 , 998 3, 087 1 .407 ( 1 , 783) (2 ,573)
NET AFTER EXPENDITUR 3, 523 2, 322 288 (2, 110) (4, 234) (24 , 852)
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES , 8%
STARTING BALANCE 4 , 063 10, 250 8,451 6, 034 3, 219 585
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7, 560 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 273 501 655 507 324 133
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 15, 152 11 , 960 9, 666 7,569 3, 869 2,379
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 833 833 833 833 833 4, 166
BAL AFTER EXPEND 10, 250 8,451 6, 034 3, 219 585 (24 , 066)
District No. 6
without waiver
Page 2
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 5. 5%
STARTING BALANCE 4, 063 10,420 8,797 6, 568 3,954 1 ,535
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7 , 660 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 273 507 673 538 368 139
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 15 , 152 12, 136 10,030 8, 134 4, 649 3 , 335
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 663 663 663 663 663 3, 315
SAL AFTER EXPEND 10,420 8,797 6, 568 3, 954 1 , 535 (22 , 259)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS , 7 . 5%
STARTING BALANCE 4,063 10,285 8, 522 6, 145 3, 371 782
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7 . 560 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 273 502 658 513 333 145
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 15 , 152 11, 996 9, 742 7, 686 4 , 031 2, 589
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 798 798 798 798 798 3, 990
BAL AFTER EXPEND 10 , 285 8,522 6, 145 3, 371 782 (23, 680)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS , 9. 5%
STARTING BALANCE 4, 063 10, 141 8, 228 5, 691 2,747 (25)
NET BOND PROCEEDS 7 , 560 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 273 497 643 487 295 95
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 15, 152 11 ,847 9, 432 7, 206 3, 369 1 , 732
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 942 942 942 942 942 4 , 712
BAL AFTER EXPEND 10, 141 8, 228 5, 691 2, 747 (25) (25 ,259)
:OUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 CSDOCI4 WITHOUT
"CAPITAL FUND CASH FLOW HARTLE WELLS WAIVER
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 7/1/86
1991/92-
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1995/96
REVENUE
FEES 21, 898 2, 343 2, 781 4,490 5 , 318 2 , 977
OTHER 255 14 14 669 34 1 , 009
TOTAL 22, 153 2, 357 2. 795 5, 159 5, 352 3 , 986
EXPENDITURES
JT FACILITIES 2, 863 2, 797 2, 712 2,676 2, 382 20, 614
DIST COLL 2,200 200 700 3, 100 3 , 100 700
OPERATING FD DEF 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER 17, 266 64 84 107 135
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 22, 329 3, 061 3,496 5, 883 5 , 617 21 , 314
FINANCING REQUIREMENTS, 1991/92-1995/96:
WITH WAIVER: 3, 986
WITHOUT WAIVER: 21 , 314
'AY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
STARTING BALANCE 464 321 (356) ( 1 ,057) ( 1 , 781) (2 , 046)
INTEREST EARNINGS 33 27 0 0 0 0
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 22, 650 2,705 2,439 4, 102 3, 571 1 , 940
NET AFTER EXPENDITUR 321 (356) (1, 067) (1 , 781) (2, 046) ( 19, 374)
FIXED RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES, 8%
STARTING BALANCE 464 7, 770 6, 432 5, 305 4, 069 3, 210
NET BOND PROCEEDS 8, 372 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 33 288 497 411 328 ( 1 , 269)
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 31 , 022 10,416 9, 724 10, 876 9, 749 5 , 927
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 923 923 923 923 923 4 , 613
BAL AFTER EXPEND 7, 770 6,432 5, 305 4,069 3, 210 (20, 000)
District No. 14
without waiver
Page 2
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES, 5.5%
STARTING BALANCE 464 7 , 959 6,815 5, 897 4 , 884 4, 262
NET BOND PROCEEDS 8, 372 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 33 295 517 445 377 (758)
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 31, 022 10,611 10, 127 11 ,501 10, 613 7 , 490
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 734 734 734 734 734 3, 671
DAL AFTER EXPEND 7, 959 6, 815 5, 897 4 , 884 4, 262 ( 17 ,495)
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YES, 7.5%
STARTING BALANCE 464 7, 809 6, 511 5,428 4,238 3,428
NET BOND PROCEEDS 8, 372 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 33 290 501 418 338 ( 1 , 163)
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 31 , 022 10,456 9,808 11 , 005 9, 929 6, 251
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 884 884 884 884 884 4 ,418
BAL AFTER EXPEND 7, 809 6, 511 5,428 4, 238 3 ,428 ( 19, 481 )
VARIABLE RATE DEBT DEBT SVC: 25 YRS, 9. 5%
STARTING BALANCE 464 7, 649 6, 186 4 , 925 3,547 2 , 534
NET BOND PROCEEDS 8, 372 0 0 0 0 0
INTEREST EARNINGS 33 284 484 389 297 ( 1 , 596)
TOTAL AVAIL FUNDS 31 , 022 10 , 290 9,465 10, 473 9, 195 4, 924
ANNUAL DEBT SVC 1 , 044 1 , 044 1,044 1 , 044 1 , 044 5 , 218
DAL AFTER EXPEND 7, 649 6, 186 4, 925 3,547 2, 534 (21 , 608)
OS56FF-1
DRAFT
NOTICE OF SALE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed proposals will be received by
the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County at the offices of
Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, 333 South Grand Avenue,
Suite 2020, Los Angeles, California 90071, on
WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1986
at 11:00 o'clock a.m. for the purchase of $ principal
amount of Certificates of Participation (the "Certificates"), evidencing
a proportionate interest in installment payments to be made by the
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (the "Districts"), for
the acquisition and construction price of joint sewerage and related
facilities and property (the "Project") pursuant to an Agreement for
Acquisition and Construction of Joint Facilities among the Districts,
dated as of August 1, 1986 (the "Acquisition Agreement"). The
Certificates are more particularly described in a Trust Agreement, by
and among the Districts and Bank of America National Trust and
Savings Association (the "Trustee"), dated as of August 1, 1986
(the "Trust Agreement"), and copies of the Acquisition Agreement
and the Trust Agreement will be furnished to any interested bidder
upon request.
Date; Denomination: The Certificates are to be delivered in fully
registered form in denominations of $5,000 or authorized integral
multiples thereof, all dated August 1, 1986, and comprising all of the
authorized Certificates.
OS56FF-2
Maturities: The Certificates will mature serially of August 1 in each
of the years and in the amounts, as follows: U
Maturity Maturity
Date Principal Date Principal
August 1 Amount August 1 Amount
1989 $ 2001 $
1990 2002
1991 2003
1992 2004
1993 2005
1994 2006
1995 2007
1996 2008
1997 2009
1998 2010
1999 2011
2000
[[Mandatory Redemption: The Certificates are subject to redemption
in whole, or in part among maturities by lot within any such maturity,
from net proceeds of insurance or net proceeds of eminent domain
proceedings, upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Trust
Agreement, at the principal amount thereof and accrued interest
thereon to the date fixed for redemption without premium.]]
Optional Redemption: The Certificates maturing on or before August 1,
1996 are not subject to optional redemption prior to maturity. The
Certificates maturing on or after August 1, 1996 are subject to redemp-
tion prior to maturity on or after August 1, 1995, at the option of the
Districts, as a whole or in part, on any February 1 or August 1, from
prepayments of the principal within each maturity, together with a
premium of , such premium to be applied against the
principal amount to be redeemed in a particular serial maturity, plus
accrued interest to the redemption date.
Payment: Both principal and interest are payable in lawful money of
the United States of America at the principal corporate trust office of
Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, Los Angeles, �..�
California.
OS56FF-3
Registration: The fully registered Certificates may be exchanged for
v a like aggregate amount of fully registered Certificates of other auth-
orized denominations of the same maturity.
Purpose: The proceeds of the sale of the Certificates are to be
applied to finance the cost of acquisition and construction of the
Districts' share of regional sewage treatment and disposal facilities.
Security: The Certificates evidence undivided ownership interests in
installment payments to be made by the Districts to the Trustee pur-
suant to the Acquisition Agreement. The Districts are required under
the Acquisition Agreement to pay such installment payments from the
general funds of the Districts lawfully available therefor. Bidders
are referred to the Acquisition Agreement, the Trust Agreement, and
the official statement for further particulars.
Tax-Exempt Status: In the opinion of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander
& Ferdon, Los Angeles, California, special counsel to the Districts,
.. the interest component of each of the installment payments paid by
the Districts pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement is exempt from
federal and State of California income taxation under existing laws,
regulations, rulings, and judicial decisions. In the event that, prior
to the delivery of the Certificates: (a) the interest component of the
installment payments or other obligations of the same type and char-
acter shall be declared to be taxable (either at the time of such
declaration or at any future date) under any federal income tax laws,
either by the terms of such laws or by ruling of a federal income tax
authority or official which is followed by the Internal Revenue Service,
or by decision of any federal court, or (b) any federal income tax law
is adopted which will have a substantial adverse effect upon holders
of the Certificates as such, the successful bidder may, at his option,
prior to tender of the Certificates, be relieved of his obligation under
the contract to purchase the Certificates, and in such case the deposit
accompanying his bid will be returned.
,,, [[=Language on pending tax legislation=]]
r _
OS56FF-4
Legal Opinion: The legal opinion of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander &
Ferdon, Los Angeles, California, approving the validity of the �..
Certificates, the Acquisition Agreement, and the Trust Agreement,
will be furnished to the successful bidder without cost. A copy of
the legal opinion, certified by the official in whose office the original
is filed, will be printed on each Certificate without charge to the
successful bidder.
TERMS OF SALE
Form of Bid; Maximum Discount: All bids must be for not less than
all of the Certificates hereby offered for sale and for not less than
98% of the par value thereof and accrued interest to date of delivery.
The amount of any discount specified in any bid shall not exceed 2%
of the aggregate principal amount of the Certificates. Each bid,
together with bidder's check, must be enclosed in a sealed envelope
addressed to the Districts with the envelope and bid clearly marked
"Proposal for Purchase of County Sanitation Districts of Orange �✓
County Certificates of Participation" Each bid must be in accordance
with the terms and conditions set forth in this notice. Bids may be
mailed or delivered to the Districts in care of Mudge Rose Guthrie
Alexander & Ferdon, in Los Angeles, California, at the address
given above, but must be received by 11:00 a.m. (California time),
July 30, 1986.
Interest Rate: Interest with respect to the Certificates is payable on
February 1, 1987, and thereafter semiannually on August 1 and
February 1 of each year. Bidders must specify the rate or rates of
interest with respect to each maturity of Certificates. Bidders will be
permitted to bid different rates of interest; but (1) each interest rate
specified in any bid must be in a multiple of one-twentieth of 1% per
annum; (ii) no Certificate shall have more than one applicable rate of
interest; (III) interest with respect to a Certificate shall be computed
from its date to its stated maturity date at the interest rate specified
in the bid; (iv) the same interest rate shall apply to all Certificates
maturing at any one time; (v) the interest rate on any maturity in
OS56FF-=
the period 1997-2011 shall not be lower than the interest rate on any
U prior maturity within such period; and (vi) any premium must be paid
as part of the purchase price, and no bid will be accepted which con-
templates the waiver of any interest or other concession by the bidder
as a substitute for payment in full of the purchase price.
Highest Bid: The Certificates will be awarded to the highest respon-
sible bidder, considering the rate or rates specified and the discount
bid or premium offered, if any. The highest bid will be determined
by deducting the amount of the premium bid (if any) from, and adding
the amount of the discount bid (if any) to the total amount of interest
which would be required to be paid with respect to all Certificates
from August 1, 1986 to their respective maturity dates at the interest
rate or rates specified in the bid, and the award will be made on
the basis of the lowest net interest cost. The purchaser must pay
accrued interest, computed on the basis of a 360-day year, from the
date of the Certificates to the date of delivery. The cost of printing
the Certificates will be borne by the Districts.
Right of Rejection: The Districts reserve the right, in their discre-
tion, to reject any and all bids and to waive irregularity or informality
in any bid.
Prompt Award: The Districts will take action awarding the Certificates
or rejecting all bids not later than twenty-six (26) hours after the
expiration of the time herein prescribed'for the receipt of bids, unless
such time of award is waived by the successful bidder. The sale of
the Certificates is subject to approval of the Acquisition Agreement
and the Trust Agreement by the Districts, and the Districts have
agreed to take action giving or withholding such approval within the
time herein specified for award. Notice of the award will be given
promptly to the successful bidder.
Delivery and Payment: Delivery of the Certificates will be made to
the successful bidder at the offices of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander
& Ferdon, Los Angeles, California, as soon as the Certificates can be
prepared, which it is estimated will be about August 15, 1986.
Payment for the Certificates must be made in Federal Reserve Bank
OS56FF-6
funds or other funds immediately available to the Districts in Los
Angeles, California. Any expense providing immediate Los Angeles
funds, whether by transfer of Federal Reserve Bank funds or
otherwise, shall be borne by the purchaser.
Right of Cancellation: The successful bidder shall have the right, at
its option, to cancel the contract of purchase if the Trustee shall fail
to execute the Certificates and tender the same for delivery within 60
days from the date of sale thereof, and in such event the successful
bidder shall be entitled to the return of the deposit accompanying his
bid.
Bid Check: A certified or cashier's check drawn on a bank or trust
company having an office in Los Angeles, California, or in New York,
New York, in the amount of $250,000, payable to the order of the
Districts, must accompany each proposal as a guaranty that the
bidder, if successful, will accept and pay for the Certificates in
accordance with the terms of his bid. The check accompanying any
accepted proposal shall be applied to the purchase price. If, after `..
the award of the Certificates, the successful bidder fails to complete
his purchase on the terms stated in his proposal, the check will be
cashed and the amount thereof retained by the Districts. The check
accompanying each unaccepted proposal will be returned promptly.
No interest will be paid upon the deposit made by any bidder.
Statement of Net Interest Cost: Each bidder is requested, but not
required, to state in his bid the total net interest cost in dollars and
the percentage net interest cost determined thereby, which shall be
considered as informative only and not binding on either the bidder
or the Districts.
No Litigation: There is no litigation pending concerning the validity
of the Certificates, the existence of the Districts, or the entitlement
of the officers thereof to their respective offices, and the successful
bidder will be furnished a no-litigation certificate certifying to the
foregoing as of and at the time of delivery of the Certificates. `,/
OS56FF-7
CUSIP Numbers: It is anticipated that CUSIP numbers will be printed
on the Certificates, but neither failure to print such numbers on any
Certificates nor any error with respect thereto shall constitute cause
for a failure or refusal by the purchaser thereof to accept delivery of
and pay for the Certificates in accordance with the terms of the
notice of sale. All expenses in relation to the printing of CUSIP
numbers on the Certificates shall be paid for by the Districts;
provided, however, that the CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the
assignment of said numbers shall be the responsibility of and shall be
paid for by the purchaser.
Official Statement: The Districts have authorized an official statement
relating to the Certificates and have authorized Bartle Wells Associates,
the Districts' financial advisor, to make use of said official statement
in connection with the sale of the Certificates. A copy of said official
statement and any other information concerning the proposed financing
will be furnished upon request to the financial advisor of the Districts,
Bartle Wells Associates, 1636 Bush Street, San Francisco, California
94109, telephone 415/775-3113.
Certificate: The Districts will deliver to the purchaser of the Certifi-
cates a certificate of an official of the Districts, dated the date of
Certificate delivery, stating that, as of the date thereof, to the best
of the knowledge and belief of said official, the official statement does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact necessary in order to-make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not mislead-
ing, and further certifying that the signatory knows of no material
adverse change in the condition of the Districts which would make it
unreasonable for the purchaser of the Certificates to rely upon the
official statement in connection with the resale of the Certificates.
500 copies of the official statement will be supplied to the purchaser
of the Certificates for this purpose at the expense of the Districts.
Dated: July _, 1986
Districts Manager
RE: AGENDA•. ITEM NO. 18
July 1, 19.86
PRELIMINARY REPORT
EVALUATION OF DISTRICTS' LIABILITY INSURANCE ALTERNATIVES
At the Fiscal Policy Committee meeting on Wednesday, June 25, the Committee
reviewed the available public liability insurance coverage and associated
premiums presented by the Districts' insurance broker, and directed the staff to
identify and evaluate various alternatives to the coverage presented by the
broker. Consistent with our experience the past two years, the broker advised
that not only was less public liability coverage available, but the estimated
premiums for the available coverage would also increase approximately three
times over the 1985-86 premiums. -
CHANGES IN POLICY FORM
The General Counsel also advised the Committee that the form of the proposed
insurance policy available to the Districts for 1986-87 had changed. In
previous years the Districts were covered by an occurrence policy whereby the
insurance company providing coverage to the Districts at the time an incident
occurred was responsible for any claims filed as a result of the incident
regardless of the date the claim was filed (within certain statutory limits) .
The proposed policy presented by the broker for 1986-87 was a claims-made form
of policy whereby the insurance company providing coverage to the Districts is
responsible only for those claims made during the time period for which they
provided coverage to the Districts. The practical effect of this switch in
policy form is to virtually guarantee that any organization initially purchasing
coverage under a claims-made policy would continue to purchase insurance from
the same carrier year after year to ensure continuity of coverage and avoid the
cost of transitioning to another carrier.
Another major change in policy form was that the proposed coverage Limits of
$950,000 for general liability and $975,000 for automobile liability include the
costs of legal investigation and defense of claims against the Districts. The
previous form provided for payment of the full $950,000 or $975,000 for
settlement of any successful claims against the Districts, and any legal defense
costs incurred by the insurance company were fully absorbed by the carrier. The
new form includes the costs of defense in the total amount of coverage provided.
For example, if a claimant received a judgement for $950,000 above our deductible
self-insured retention of $250,000, and the insurance company spent $450,000 in
unsuccessful defense of the claim against the Districts, the new policy form
would bind the insurance company to pay only $500,000 ($950,000 total coverage
less $450,000 in defense costs) as its share of the judgement. Either the
Districts or an excess insurance carrier would remain liable for the additional
$450,000 due the claimant. In effect, this policy form results in the Districts
actually receiving potentially much less coverage than the actual face value of
the policy. -
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED FOR EVALUATION
In light of the continuing reductions in coverage accompanied by major premium
increases, the Committee directed the staff to evaluate other alternatives for
Preliminary Report
Page Two
July 1, 1986
both general and automobile liability coverage. The alternatives evaluated in
this report include:
- full self-insurance for the Districts' public liability
risk management program
- participation in either industry-based or other public
agency pooled risk-sharing arrangements
- the availability of coverage with an increased deductible
self-insured retention level of up to $1 million.
- segregation of the general liability portion of the coverage
from the automobile liability portion and use of separate
sources of coverage for the two areas of risk.
The purpose of this report is to present evaluations of these and other
alternatives for liability insurance coverage for the 1986-87 fiscal year.
BACKGROUND
The Districts have been partially self-insured for public liability coverage
since 1979. Based upon a recommendation by the Fiscal Policy Committee, the
Joint Boards established a separate Public Liability Self-Insured Fund effective
July 1, 1979, with an initial reserve balance of $250#000. Over the past seven
years this reserve balance has increased to its current level of $651,000 as a
result of excellent claims experience and high interest earnings on the reserves
in the fund.
The Districts have continued to carry excess public liability insurance since
establishment of the self-insurance fund, but the major increases in premiums,
associated reductions in coverage, and difficulties in placing and maintaining
coverage over the past three years have caused the Fiscal Policy Committee to
request a reexamination of this practice. Exhibits 1-A and 1-B highlight the
dramatic differences in premiums between 1985-86 and 1986-87 for the same levels
of coverage.
As an interim measure, the Fiscal Policy Committee authorized the staff and the
broker to extend the Districts' $975,000 of existing primary insurance coverage
over a deductible self-insured retention of $250,000 (plus $25,000 per claim) to
July 15, 1986 for a premium of approximately $10,000 to enable the staff and the
broker to evaluate other alternatives such as those previously listed in the
report. The Districts' two additional tiers of $5 million each in excess
liability coverage expired July 1, 1986.
FULL SELF-INSURANCE
The primary alternative of interest to the Fiscal Policy Committee was full �/
Preliminary Report
Page Three
July 1, 1986
self-insurance by the Districts. The Districts appear to be well-positioned as
a whole to move to full self-insurance because:
- most of the Districts are in excellent financial position,
and have large cash reserves on hand
- the Districts' claims history has been outstanding for the
past thirty years
- one of the Districts' major risk exposures is in the area of
trunk sewer construction on surface streets, and all Districts'
contractors are required to carry from $1 million to $3 million
in liability coverage, and must also name the Districts as
additional insureds under the policy acquired for the construction
project.
Under this approach, however, the Districts would accept full responsibility for
insuring our large fleet of vehicles, which operate daily throughout our large
service area and constitute our largest public liability risk.
While the Districts collectively have accumulated considerable cash in
appropriated construction reserve funds, the majority of the cash and reserves
`d is held by three of the most financially secure districts. Adoption of a full
self-insured public liability program would potentially be feasible only if all
the Districts agreed to operate the program on a pooled basis, sharing the risks
collectively. As this type of pooling arrangement is already presently employed
by the Districts for sharing the operating and capital costs of the joint faci-
lities (and for paying premiums for the Districts' various types of insurance
coverage such as all-risk property, travel and accident, boiler and machinery,
and public liability) , among all Districts, sharing the risks collectively also
appears consistent with the Districts' historical operating philosophy.
The smaller, less financially sound Districts could participate in full
self-insurance under this form of arrangement with a degree of certainty that
their financial position would not be severely eroded in the event of a major
judgment against the Districts resulting from an incident occurring in one of
these districts. On the other hand, should the Districts decide to pool
liability insurance risks only for joint facilities and operations, and hold
each individual district solely responsible for claims occurring in that
district's service area, the smaller, less financially sound districts would
potentially want the Districts to continue to acquire public liability coverage
(even though it was quite expensive) to protect them from major judgments
against them as individual Districts.
POTW/PUBLIC AGENCY POOLING ARRANGEMENTS
As the public liability insurance crisis has grown over the past few years, the
Districts' staff and legal counsel have been participating in various sanitation
agency conferences and meetings to discuss pooled insurance arrangements for
Preliminary Report
Page Four
July 1, 1986
all-risk property and public liability insurance coverage. As the Directors are
aware, various cities in Orange County have become members of Southern
California-based joint powers authorities providing pooled liability and other
types of insurance coverage and related services.
POTN Pooling Arrangements
Both the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and the national
Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) have been developing
cooperative insurance programs, and the Districts have reviewed and evaluated
the programs under discussion by each group.
AMSA's program is still under development and they are considering formation of
both an onshore and an offshore (outside O.S. territory - in Bermuda, the Grand
Cayman Islands, etc.) insurance company, a common practice for captive insurance
companies and reinsurers. The General Counsel advises that the legal basis for
this type of pooling arrangement may preclude our participation in its
formation. The difficulty with a national pooling program is that it must be
structured to attempt to accommodate the differing laws of the 50 states
relative to what their political subdivisions (i.e., the Districts) are allowed
to do.
In the case of CASA's program, entitled the California Sanitation Risk v
Management Authority (the Authority) , the proposed Authority is to be
established on July 1, 1986 as a joint exercise of powers agreement under
California law. The Authority proposes to provide jointly purchased insurance,
excess insurance, reinsurance, risk management and claims administration
services to its member agencies.
In light of the dramatic increase in proposed premiums for liability coverage
for 1986-87, staff is actively following the status of formation of the
CASA/AMSA programs. At this point, however, liability coverage and premiums
available via membership in these programs have not been established by either
group. Staff will present a verbal status report regarding these programs to
the Committee at the meeting.
Public Agency Pooling Arrangements
Staff contacts with officials in cities within our service area indicate that
there are two major joint power authorities in the Southern California area
providing some form of pooling arrangement for public liability and other forms
of insurance coverage. These authorities are: -
- Orange County Cities Risk Management Authority
- Southern California Joint Powers Insurance Authority
In the case of the Orange County group, its membership includes several of the -
smaller cities within the Districts' service area, including Newport Beach, �/
Preliminary Report
Page Five
July 1, 1986
Irvine, and Tustin. No special districts are presently included in its
membership at this time.
The region-wide group, which has 50 cities and one Ventura County-based special
district as members, Includes Fountain Valley, Villa Park and other Orange
County cities. At present, the organization has a membership moratorium in
effect, and does not intend to accept or evaluate applications for new members
until January 1987 at the earliest.
Exhibit 2 presents representative coverage, deductible/self-insured retention
and premium data for two of our member agencies, one of which is in each of
these two groups. In light of the region-wide group's existing moratorium on
new members (plus a three-to-six-month application, onsite inspection, claims
review and membership approval process) , the Districts could not expect to
participate in this group until the spring or summer of 1987 assuming we were
accepted for membership. While the Orange County group appears to be
considering expansion of its membership at this time, we could also expect time
delays in review and acceptance of an application for membership in this group
as well, particularly since the group has no special district members.
INCREASED DEDUCTIBLE/SELF-INSURED RETENTION ALTERNATIVES
At the request of the staff, the Districts' broker approached Oxford Property a
Casualty, our existing primary public liability carrier, to evaluate the
company's interest in providing coverage to the Districts over an increased
deductible or self-insured retention of $1 million. The Districts' existing
excess liability carriers had previously advised the broker that they were not
interested in continuing to provide excess coverage if the Districts replaced
its primary coverage with a large self-insured retention limit.
When Mr. Beckendorf approached Oxford, our primary carrier, this week, the
company expressed an interest in maintaining its role as our primary carrier,
and gave him two alternative proposals for our consideration as outlined in
Exhibit 3. While each alternative reflects a significantly higher self-insured
retention or deductible level to be assumed by the Districts ($650,000
self-insured retention for Option No. 1 and $1,000,000 deductible for Option No.
2) , the carrier is able to lower its premiums significantly and move back to an
occurrence policy form. These changes result from the broker's opportunity to
avoid use of the excess carriers providing the second tier of coverage under the
original 1986-87 proposals outlined on Exhibit 1-B. The only excess carriers
interested in providing the original excess coverage to the Districts refused to
participate unless the primary carrier shifted to a claims-made form of policy.The broker expects to have additional quotes for excess coverage under these two
options within the next week.
ASSIGNED RISK AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY PLAN
`..,� The State of California has established an assigned risk automobile liability
insurance plan to provide coverage to public agencies whose trucks and other
Preliminary Report
Page Six
July 1, 1986
high-use vehicles are difficult to insure via commercial insurance companies.
Our broker has other clients whose high-risk vehicles are covered by this plan,
including the Midway City Sanitary District, one of our member agencies, and has
suggested that the Districts' vehicles, particularly our high-use vehicles,
might qualify for coverage under this plan.
In contrast to our existing liability insurance, which covers all Districts'
facilities as well as all vehicles owned and operated by the Districts, this
plan would only cover our vehicles, particularly our high-use vehicles such as
our sludge trucks, construction inspection, industrial waste, line-cleaning and
other high-mileage vehicles that are routinely driven throughout our service
area on Districts' business. Staff has identified in excess of eighty high-use
vehicles which could potentially be covered by this plan, and has forwarded a
detailed list to the broker to review with the State and determine their
eligibility under the plan.
Should the State authorize our participation in the plan, the broker advises us
that our premium would be $1,850 per vehicle for $1 million in coverage with no
deductible.
The following table presents the anticipated costs of coverage for the
Districts' 159 road-authorized vehicles:
NO. of Anticipated
Category Typical Uses Vehicles Premium Remarks
High-use Sludge hauling, 83 $153,550 No deductible
construction/
IN inspections,
line cleaning,
administrative
travel
Low-use Inter-plant 76 $140,600 No deductible
transportation,
plant maintenance,
hauling, etc.
TOTAL ANTICIPATED PREMIUMS $294,150
Participation in this plan would require the Boards to adopt a resolution -
declaring a need for $1 million in individual coverage for each of our vehicles.
Those Districts vehicles which are used only at our treatment facilities or are
only driven back and forth between the two treatment plant sites could possibly
be excluded from the State assigned risk plan. Other possible coverage options
Preliminary Report
Page Seven
July 1, 1986
which might he considered for these vehicles, of which there are 76, include:
- if the Districts' vehicles are eligible, and the Districts
choose to cover just the high-use vehicles under the State's
assigned risk plan, those vehicles which are used solely at
the Districts' treatment plant sites could be covered by a
general liability policy such as one of the proposed
policies presented elsewhere in this report, or could not
be covered at all
- the Districts could choose to go without any coverage for
both the vehicles used to transport personnel and materials
between the plant sites and those which remain on the site
at all times.
SUMMARY
Exhibit 4 summarizes the alternatives presently under review by the staff,
the General Counsel and the broker. We hope to receive additional information
from the broker by Fiscal Policy Committee meeting time on Thursday, July 3,
upon which to base a final recommendation.
IXIg= DBLTA44M OUVERAC£ El00BPf 1-A
6/18/86
Proposed 0aductible Self- 1985-86
Type of N✓erage lKexel Date Amount of Coverage 3nsurel Retention Premium Darks
IXC6S R131ZC LIABILITY
A. E fisting Coverage (1985-86)
1. Primary Coverage July 1, 1986 $975,000 $250,000 aggregate a) $ 75,000 1984-85 policy canceled
plus $25,000 for (April 15, 1985 early necessitating
every claim to April 14, 1986) reveal on April 15 vs.
regular renewal date of
July 1, 1985.
b) $ 22,553 (April 15, Crtrrrier extended policy
1986 m June 30, for 2h nrnUs at higher
1986) premium to enable
oxvnclidation of all tiers
of coverage 1986-87.
2. Exress Oarerage-Lst tier July 1, 1986 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $ 49,500
3. aces 0>mrage-2rd tier July 1, 1986 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $ 27,500
TOM PRORATED
PRB4RM 1985-86 $j5.8 28
PROPOSED O7JFWi;e AVAIIABIE (MIESFD) PADBrr 1-B
6/1B/86
6/24A6
Pevised 6/25/86
Proposed Deductible Self- PrcpxeV%tiwated
type of Coverage Pavel Date Mont of Coverage Irsured Retention, 1986-87 Premiva Peiiarks
EXCESS PUBLIC LIABIL.rM
A. Proposed Coverage (19B6-B7)
Pavised
$250,000 aggregate
plus:
1. Primary Ooverage July 1, 1987 $950,000-Ga oral -$50,000 for every -Osasrerce policy
Liability claim $239,257
$975,000-Aubmcbile -$25,000 for every (estimated) -Clam made policy
claim (may be @ 10% higher)
2. Daess 0ouerage-1st tier July 1, 1987 $2,500,000 $1,000,000 $ 96,458
3. Dacess Overage-2M tier July 1, 1967 $2,500,000 $3,500,000 $ 55,000
(estinated)
4. R] ess Coverage-3rd tier July 1, 1987 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $ 40,000 -Assumes availability
(estimated) of reirsucance
Tam MIMIED
PFEKRM 1986-87 $430,705
FMOMIATIVE D49JRM(E DA1A - PUBLIC I.IABI xry nwwRmm EOMrf 2
7/1/e6
PIBLIC A1@LY POOLED INSU NCE AVNUR=
Pooled Insurance Effective Date Existing/ Eedctible/.aelf- EKisting/Prcpased
City Authority of Ob erage Proposed Overage Loured Fetention Premim Level R0 ks
1. Fountain Valley Scuthern California April, 1986 A. $500,000 $ 20,000 $ 55,000 Only 1 special district
Joint [towers Insurance (primary coverage) mbar/existi'g mxatorim
Authority on new,members/earliest
B. $10,000,000 $500,000 $ 93,000 passible ambecship avail-
(excess coverage) ability-.Spzirg/tr ,
1987.
1ODV. 1986-87 PFEARM $148,000
2. Newport Beach Orange Aunty Cities August, 1986 A. $5,000,000 $500,000 $450,000 Na special district
Risk Mmiageient (primary coverage) (premim0 marbers applicetion review
Authority and approval process lot -
$ 30,000 tially )reclines Districts'
(service fees) participation within the
next few maths.
Bub-total $480,000
B. $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $450,000
(emcass coverage) (estimated)
1OML EGrIMIAFD
1986-87 PIEPBUS $930,000
( 1 1
MULM) IFS1r9` ME/ME-PLMII ) dE[E nCN ALMRATrvm EXMrr 3
7/1/86
FM
DIMMCIS' VEHICLE AND GaEPAL PUBLIC IDABILM DMRPl4CE
Deductible/Self- Pcopcoed/Eatimated
Type of Coverage Almhmt of Coverage Ebrm of Policy Insured IL-tention 1986-87 Premium Pmarks
PUBLIC LEABILITy
A. Proposed Cption No. 1
(1986-87 policy yeas)
1. Vehicle and general $975,000 4'xtiurerce $450,000 aggregate $152,000 - Districts administer all claims
public liability (each occurrence) plus $25,000 self- and file claims in excess of
insurance (each insured retention aggregate with carrier
occurrence) per claim
- Data on excess liability
coverage not available at this
time
B. Propamd Option No. 2 0
(1986-87 policy year)
1. Vehicle liability $1,000,000 Orcurrence $1,000,000 deductible) - No aggregate applies to vehicle
insurance (each accurrerce) ) coverage
$75,000
2. General liability $1,000,000 Osurrerce $1,000,000 deductible) - Districts continue to al do
invsarce (each oourrerre) plus $1,000,000 ) istec claim, but carrier has
aggregate ) authority to review/settle any
claim at its discretion
- Carrier requires $1 million
letter of credit from Districts
- Data on ems liability
coverage rot available at this
tine
9NM¢R IW�C WHWtt P9d¢K'2ePiT/6 7 ®1
M
,u-tams t�rrnv.nmrs gma]u.wo wewu
1. !4LL 41[-Lwam 3. CbvlN mJC nva unxl prlio 1. WUbY uYJ mu SOT a[cNb 1.N a mmYGttl OU¢ILL ma
pIP.0 N plo Nb mm pOYc m¢l.b]NN pWt¢.suw. 4 onllmt lWrcw m.11Um W
` ' YW W H tra'la!'nl m 4 I[wm dWy gvetlm c[61 Ngrxe �[dRGN al.eeolq NIl
"+ (WrW mLL nelOtl 0t h rNclu Wu9hv[az arvb If-Lmuv[rWe1CWH.
I9M81� llID.mcl mr W aoYv]61an.e w'Jclr
at ac pWt.lW.ad tea tr mllgr
m PY Yq et c¢ 191 bWs aU
m rll m ery�1.Y�rld gelmt W
Wvlm.
]. O1e444' m[ a tgYCY m
meN Len1YN 4a¢+iv mr Obv4a'
m.v cim�vm a.f mm d u
tlllGmfl ImvW.
1. w avvma umYa m.wm Pcury
cWm Ievv r ru m Prlm
mlvlbu¢.m m.bt emllm. Im
[I/rnYYY.mEU wUlm m W
.wit N nya 7�4 yAe Nr.
.. Irnw wlea atwry
u. Imltl Itir6u[Ir L W VIN m W wuupd ✓. i. M.vtN wW rv.yctlm o!w 1.A oMU1N rr 4 IopLLy RxLtlN
xy[_v QA M1¢MG pnL1[Id-W[irq am[eq ma.eRN1.Vauw®d W hu prticlPtl,9 N W.4axNtM
q[sv�e NN Wu op[mNmum auclPdl M9� WULL pl}N Rml'm el lYvg W r IweesT Mpels
¢elr m Pwli Inwuv [gYrvd Imta}rlum inbon.[ (Mfly pm c4k Rgcm.
pLe�¢v� Igal6le'ee¢d W b NY Unl.
edIN.UWm rev We Wt m�W
NNmlm ev geda m npr 3.A ReieW utl¢lur bn m
o[us lldeutlae a r Nta �.[Yq Ne¢ry m m ru0Yab1
gaci¢m1 wer W let Wa dt!R Yeicw/nln�avo.
IW..
).A pe¢4v meW ItW[IeLLY b
YwLq[IW NN Wv quell NN
Pa raH[mavw.r wlr
wAYµyn rb.Pbmw.
9.pG11c AIRY It w MI.,
1.OUv4ta mYp P[u4Pv b 1,awry W Wv 4 1.W eI W r1s Svtlen OY6md-
valm ReW[WSIw IM qrf vRN 6®U[eNV a In4tY' eedC rttlup 4..vatR4mm
wid Nm a[me mlt[vnle 4N[bt�t.uNaiN,r vµlq rev neCe[.. atl p[ue1PUP
�� clue 4 Rwlb Imepv, es ry 6o tltltlwl¢mya M s N¢bn NLL RrG01Y rWIS[t r
Wsm. 4q1 hl¢w s A N(A WULL pm-m{cmiw nry4s mdNN gdlouq[erir.¢e(m
NW4Ueum revlde Wt m-YC mt m rrGl W[o�VI4Uw rlr 4eycum W p¢oN Rmm.
NNmlm ee gmue m sp[ H eal.uq�YcI�U 1®W
mvb[ lLctmtue. pmlm r4mn et eW Wwl.
1.A Olevina mld ptrUeLLY b
Nv4q cUN NN bbr gvclr
NN pv uleH cuC./tivr
cWu N.mryTyh rW PUWaI.
1¢. Vc++W wL.srn4' S.A GUvlav NY py a be[ 1. b W art a[a 1NDrit n! Sr. Nn L a NU pNt W tree[Im br u.WY
41!-Ir'ct'1 Rwielm Pmlu m[mvge H.rvW9 SI wwm. W peo-lm�dYG 4 m ImU my[le® mwrbtl b
•Ngiv 6ictlC4 e[W m!L rrp[eWY m: W PU[e Juymt m RdIEVq m4eW meraP xc W
NLLIm Iw.o¢matYq Y4'Ulle uYY uy lepl[m+�IaW NN R1ntY mmge.
e[i110.W11. bfv al W wlm. tt{v04q v
W mvgo r1etW vdt[ NU
4t1m. W WUlca vvW.lro
emw[apemWH m:W m 53
NWm N q¢spU eLln pW Sl 1.A OUv4n mLE pb%LYy
.a. b ucip" Rln m W ryYca v stunt a[�eW
artl¢peuclptLq In pent N mwcge wer W RW['/mr[ge
elela. m P cu tlLL[Iwl me[/P !Q
rpr wM me W VCreN
f.A pepaol Rlmy d[[Im NY M1dcuNe/rY-Ls'I[et 4antlm W
[epYn W Dbvlcv m palb• Rlm[y maap.
it NWm Slro of¢.ut m eerie
¢c WILLN4�A11NWm
f al
®t W IKM.1 a[¢sYt u btu -
at NU tiv1. A oUVICa mrW
PwueYY 4cra.W[suw N
W Pnllc LI.ESYb+WJmeel
NJ m ll Ylllm IW+Um 41xoU
SISLg01+N pYpa W<tr¢w
Id Rlm [eQrvl m rwN N4
[pal[emt.
n. Red Ialgrl Itle4 1.A WUlcv mvW{mNeYY 1.A pglu Ex ma[4 uw[NU L a N4 PW. W trdv fe.rt
twtle WpW[Y Ade W Y9 el lm[mtatly pla N f1.fl10 p[WJcd,d W W W sdff Of m[ellgmW
N
H.d wNclr 4[1l Nlllm 41p NN SYN.Y4 bt W 4edYU' eNve 4:PnlelPtlm N W pLnl W
m JdCt101e ubr m4 pW. {y1 f1rt. ou pi p[tmlPtlm In
NU Plan L 9cmm tM W Rmlm
trs cRwl N mN ee gevN xl
andb IYewH Rbur xwcq.
gtu,m m wwlt l<.
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
JULY 9, 1986 - 7:30 P.M.
J1 .•I M1I 4GrAIN61'H IUI I'^Off SSINC. PnTr F/ ^•/PF FAY,',
PfrO.1 IIIIM^Ip AI41
Cr 1'V IY FtI•TATIPN AID
I.641F. NT DVAMfT Cl'UNiY
f.l f•IRP IAIM I11/"6
N AFR LA'1 kli. V.1'PDI APTILINI IfC'.I.It IF I I PH
gPfa6!• P."'. R`SI fpSF ANY f.54,iM PUBLICATION
,•A'4Ef t1c".1P1141 •N fLIV 15AA.^5 PAINTING
IPt4(? L[-((-LN NL117+ A IRTIPIG^S 1^6P.:`U INSTALL CARPET/PERSONNEL OFFICE
I A I4p1 A,,rrsm IAOf .;TPIIS• INC. %I. -n6• 6 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
q N(^E9 .II. COLI) SUFLU INC. 139.1. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
06470 ALL-CIATF VFPICLFS. INC. 12026.IG VEHICLE LEASE.
3F i471 ALLIED ANALYTICAL SYSTLIIa f1,4.S 6.RL LAB SUPPLIES
CP,a71 1LLSFD CONPCPAIIC% fA,I71.79 CHEMICAL COAGUlANIS
3. ALLIED SUPPLY CO. IJI6.^4 VALVES
m. 9pE4T4 ANEPICn4 U'pIICAL SOGILTY $2p.^g PUBLICATION
12...II3.P}
Z ^P:qft AMLRICAN CYANAMID CATIONIC POLYMER
I= oE':4Tb AMEt ICAN CISTRICI TELFLRAPM t6P.L') INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
n APL447 AMFPICtK FLFFT PAPIS 1,S49.611 TRUCK PARTS
nf:47? ANAHEIN RURINCss PACMINCS 125A.L5 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
.4 g6..AT' ANPIIFIM SCVFR CONSTRUCTION $1..10U.0D DEMOLISH SANTA ANA TRUNK MANHOLE-DIST. I
II111 Ppg^p0 ANAL ADS 1.125. 10 LAB SERVICES
rAq.Al ANC ANC1100. PeCMI Nf CO. f7 J04.F1 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
PP•402 AQUA BIN CLPP. l6.1'U.52 ANIONIC POLYMER
'1P'F+P3 AUTOMATED DI'PIFPPINF SOFTLY tl,iP l.tu MELDING SUPPLIES
U PP..+R4 RC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC. >5T3.51 TRUCK PARTS
f P)4P5 Pxx CORPOP n110N E19.564.74 SLUDGE DISPOSAL
1.8006 6PP SAFETY L SOFTLY VSf,.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES
e) O
gE`4NT RARCN PNCNN PFRFO01 sP 6.45 DEFERRED COMP. PAYOFF
` fz R^ CLAP SALES A SCFVICT ,INC. sial.ln MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
f,IN.•In TRUCK PARTS
f4R DON C. E TIE
( ty Gp)496 PECKNAN IAEUSTR UL/FgO[f SS f1,294.31' INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
I--. D,.51 [`ECKxAN IKCUSTRIIL CO. 644.00 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
(h {H 492 PO YLE FOFINLf gING CORP 131, 10."1 ENGINEERING 7-7 A 7-2C-R
CA;4^3 PRITMI NFC ELECTRIC S560.10 EMPLOYEE TRAINING,/INSTRUMENTATION
�.:. IF.4S4 Y.C. BROOKE SR4.",A EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
r0 Qpn4F5 FPONN B CALBVELL f3, (g'I.LO LAB SERVICES
-1 [6N+96 STEVE PUPALD CONSTRUCTION CO. 196,859.41 CONTRACTOR 7-2C-4
tl's Pet q97 PUGPF [NFINFCRING Co. 11,16.39 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
'.P"4Nq MILLIAM M. PUTLER 17sh.3H PETTY CASH
GA'. 4q9 CPT CALIFOPNIA, INC. f16.4q OFFICE SUPPLIES
sP h9yG Cs COMPANY t%A65.35 VALVES
n P'r'nl CAL-gLLSS FOR ""LARCH- INC. 399.12 LAB SUPPLIES
PEOSG2 CAL SOUTH ELUIPMENT CO. f133.)O EQUIPMFNT MAINTENANCE
'IA'SUS CAL-T11FRM CO. fe,2"g..:P APPLY THERMAL INSULATIDN TO BOILERS
GPi5G4 CALTPOL , INC. t)N L'3 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
^P'.!.T5 CAI IFOR NIA SUPPE SS AN SYSTFPS t22S.GY COMPUTER REPAIR
OF UECS CALIF. pI51 PTAIING L AIR TONI' tm.31 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
UP^5U7 CANCO, INC. I905.9L TRUCK PARTS
ORFpGP {CNTfL SYSTCMS I1,4T4.RT INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
C P'AP)9 CPEMMEST INIA151MI15. INC- t35.TT A.^1' FERRIC CHLORIDE
IIP'EdC CHi'VRON U.S.A.. INC. 12,'(R4.JP GASOLINE/OIL
' � I
)I IUkD GO •.I ,il OICI VOPYIFIP CfI ITAt rAnLL6SING D41" a/^5/Rr I661'
N 919OPT HUFFER dill
frDAI♦ 1p01TAIION IIS/x ICTS of OFAIIOf COUNTY
CLAIN9 PAIL
VApMAfi MI.. 91 NI OF AMOUNT -It Irf IF'T I ON
IP•.!II cm rFIH" SPIC.I3L Illf9, INC. I6P 1.N3 CHLORINATION EQUIPMENT
L Ny•.12 TOMHA,• I.ANI•"C A t2,lN 1.13 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
4R:! 13 r..I.• .r.. . CA. INC. SP65.lt PUMP PARTS
Op•s1A CUMP+CSSON CONi ObiNTS OF CALIC 52,544.4E ENGINE PARTS
• 4C^C0 CokSOLiCATFF F11'CTPICAL DI!T. 13,661.P3 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
OAF"qf. COknnLICATLO REPPOGRAr OICS 14R11.79 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTIONS
PPP"17 CONTROL DATA COPP. 1495.91 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
n FpECIN COGI•CR ENFPGT IERVICCS 11,254.32 PUMP PARTS
.(7 rPA!19 COSA INSTRUMENT cop. S3.357.23 PORTABLE METER
m nMS!PR COSTA MESA Polo PARTS, IKC. $643.33 TRUCK PARTS
C 5F•'S 21 COIINIV VHCLESALC ELFCTPIC t243.59 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
3> oP^•22 CNARLE[ P. CROWLEY CO. 5903.42 PUMP PARTS
C P 1':2.3 CAL VATLR S477.4S WATER SOFTENER RENTAL
10.694 S1AIf OF CALIFOEHIA S499.0P PROCESS FEE/REORGANIZATION NO. 79/DIST. 13 F 14
" -1 ;.F+ `,^n STAIF OF CALIFORNIA 14.366.93 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ASSESSMENT '
CP:f26 UM CPT. INC. 9224.72 PP PARTS
1 CR!'!21 OANIFLS TIRE Sf RVICE S3,638.90 TRUCK PARTS
4t ^PUS2A CATA IPPRESSIONS, INC. $272.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES
f•-' pslti29 DECO S541.62 ELECTRICAL PARTS
(7 ca's"D OCIST-NINSFILLO, INC 141,151.98 RELOCATE HYDROGEN PEROXIDE PUMPS s TANKS
1 Pp C451 UIESCL LOGInTICS, INC. S251.2P ENGINE PARTS
• 98C.5ZP DIFILIFFO AESOCIAIES 11.196.55 PRINTING
'f 118"33 DISPOSAL CONTROL SPRVICC. INC. $11,296.A0 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL
r OPf•34 DO-ADD ENTERPRISES, INC. f24.044.JP EMERGENCY BASIN REPAIRS
OR4:!SS DUNN MAROS CORP. 51.213.70 PAINT SUPPLIES
r .t=l OAFr36 EASTMAN, Ikr. 11.802.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES
'N CPMSST FEDERAL CYPRESS CORP. $22.ON DELIVERY SERVICE
�-I 0011!3p FISCHER C PORTrR CO. f357.75 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
7U ENDS" FLO-SYSTEMS S1.441.60 PUMPS
081.44 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT S1.544.611 PAINT SUPPLIES
�
Fbi C41 COKALD L. FOX R ASSOCIATES S829.00 SAFETY CONSULTANTS
9PJx42 111E FOXOOMP COMPANY 5352.2E
�[n INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
VPp543 FRANCE COPFFESSON PRODUCT S267.n5
• EQUIPMENT PARTS
n85l44 CITY OF FULLFRTON $15.59
Fp O545 TRUCK C PITS OP OUP/GM S7.9RR.16 WATER USAGE
TRUCK
L6:!46 f• V MAI NTENANC F, INC. 312.5P PUMP CONSTRUCTION
oPP541 GANAPA LUMRFR CO. $1.346.34 TELEPHONE ON WOTERIALS
xPfs" GENEPAL IELC INC. CO, S1,3A6.34 EQUIPMENT NETWORK CHARGES
CA.1049 LEOPARD T AS, INC.. f3,134.12 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
OAG!!6 MANpIc"ARD
CIE A. GIGLIO 335.79 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
i 28C!51 HAR CIESCL RAF.NO Nf 133 S.JU TRUCK PARTS
OF+!PB PARIITON
P SALES OFFICE SUPPLIES
46UF53 MIN1• N INPUSAPIAL TIASTIC6 . INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
OPM•S4 MILTER INC. $126.19
TOOLS
j' cats!`• HOOPER CAMERA STORES S40.2A CAMERA SUPPLIES
II CR"!!R NOU SF OF tlAllfxl(S 1627421.p7 BATTERIES
I !
I
Dj FUND NC '1'•^ Jl 1%IST W0PP T MG C&T'I III PROCESSING DATE 6/Og/116 rAG/ 3 ~
W Rr FOP.T VUHn ER AP43
CnUNT1 SANIIATIOH 015TPTOtS OF ORANGE COUNTY
II CLAIMP PAID JR/II/AI.
VAPPAP:I Pp. VFNPOP &MOUNT OES(NIrTInN
III,IF67 DALE I. HOVI ARA•N $222.64 DEFERRED COMP. PAYOFF
OPU!5q 1111ATIN6I0R ^FACH PUFFER STAMP 153.nn OFFICE SUPPLIES
rq I6q PUK11116TOR SUPPLY 1441.14 HARDWARE
I OFY!*5 ISCP COMPANY l3079.24 PUMP PARTS
� I P.PnP61 IT CORP. S628.90 LAD SERVICES �
C9i.b(2 IMPEPIAL Vr51 CNr MICAL 212,547.59 FERROUS CHLORIDE
CPPS63 INOUSIPIAL TFIRFAL•EO FPOOVCIS S1H5.20 TOOLS
8J5F4 IRVINL RANCH VATrP. DISTRICT $4.10
D u9P^ WATER USAGE
65 CHAP LEG A. JACMS l04.31 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
FR:S67 AON JANITORS SMDINCPPE .g86.31
! = uML 6R7 JONCS CHEMICALS. INC. 138.532.62 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
KJ CHLORINE
PP15R P. HIEVIT PACIFIC CO. t178$172.53 CONTRACTOR PN-06IR-2 A PW-061R-3
n 5PC!69 MING BEARING. INC. 3112.53
� 68u S7R HIRST PUMP C MACHINE WORMS 176.9.7u BEARINGS
PRP57l NLEEN-LINE COOP SLJ17.R3 PUMP PARTS
JRC572 L.A. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS I527.81 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
O81573 LAUPSEN COLOR LAB 16.94 PUMPS
JF1,571 LEVCO ELECTRIC CO. $297.12 FILM PROCESSING
CP;'75 LIETEAU PRTTFRNS. INC. I266.25 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
011576 LIFECOM-SAFETY SFRVICr SUPPLY 145-0 FABRICATE IMPELLER PATTERN
u Rg577 LIFHTING DISTRIOUIORS, INC. S410.P1 SAFETY SUPPLIES
!I' ORC570 MAL CON PIRNIE, INC. 135.562.07 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
(' ( g UP"•579 MARINE S VALVE SUFPLY l ENGINEERING PT-25
S?8.R1 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
Erb 6tl`5PU MF/T - CMICP. INC. f?P.97 PUMP PARTS
I A JOSEPH A. MCDOMALD LB 2.1C DEFERRED COMP. PAYOFF
( 086592 MC 'FADDEN DALE HARDWARE CO. 532.52 TOOLS
011I1503 MICROBICS CORPORATION 31.102.0E LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIR
06t584 PINE. SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. f2.85T.00 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
( JB'.CBS MONTGOMERY FLEVATOR COMPANY 9328.48 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
OP05P6 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES 52.310.00 - LAB SERVICES
6P0P87 J. OT INC. Ch. INC. 165 .65 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
+ N D865P0 NA C WEST,
INC. 125&.61
1. UPAFP9 NATIONAL
WESNAL LUMBER SI1185.I1 EQUIPMENT PARTS
gP;r9J NAl10NAL SAFETY COUNCIL 1175.0D ANNHARUALM ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP
osts-I ne O5g1 NORM NELSON 32P. DEFERRED COMP. PAYOFF
CBoS92 HEVARM ELECTRONICS lRO.glo] ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PBAS•93 NUEVO CAMINO CONSTRUCTION f2P.0I5.50
' C005g4 NUEVO CAMINO CONSTRUCTORS $3.166.11 CONTCONTRACTOR 2-10-TA
I' MI(Tg5 OCEAN SALT CO.. INC. 5330.72 SALT TOR 2-10-IA
68
6596 OLYMPIC CPFMICAL CO. 561.696.69 BULK CHLORINE
11 OR059T ORA MEE
ANGC COAST EICCTgIC SUPPLY 39PB,H) ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
6P 1'!9P ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 1646.71
1 OPP595 ORANGE COUNTY VHOLESALf $135.75 HYDROCHLORIC ACID
I1 98L600 ORANGE. VAt Vr S flmemc CO. 1511.11 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
5676.g7 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
f"• 6RO6D1 ORIIFN CORP
� i :P^o AZ OXYGEN SERVICE T7P.60 BEARINGS
SI. OXYGEN
1;
N
Ia FEINT, NG •+1 "' , Jl PIST VCPKING CAFFIAL CFOCC551NG DATE 6/C5/P6 PAOE 9
I .0 FFPORI HUMMER AIA' 'I
COUNTY SANITATIPN PTSIRICTS OF OPARGL CPUN TY '
- CLAIMS PAID 'I6/11/86
'. i WARPANT I.P. VI NEAR AMOUNT OE 6IF I PT ION
I '
C861 111 CgLNTY ^C DPANCF I2g9.PO LAB SERVICES
CPp A:A COUNTY SANITATION OISTPICT •A.209.76 REIMBURSE VORKERS CORP. INSURANCE FUND
Rp Cf F5 FACIFIC SAFETY LOUIPNENT CO. $1,271.64 SAFETY SUPPLIES
nH r.F i1F PACIFIC 6CLL 1115.61
TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES
e00107 PEAT. MANWICK. MITCHELL 6 CD, 152L.GC
BOILER REPAIR
1pt (0 PUPIEP TOILER SER YI CC. INC. 3509.PP BOILER flEPAIR
lbV619 PnStmAHAROLDE ICP 32•D]2.OD POSTAGE
ra CA",11 1AGGRE PRimAGGRESSIVE
STE ICE' 300.55 ICE
PO V611 IIIG GFESSI VF STEEL SUPPLY 31r 3U 0.55 STEEL
q CP0612 PULASKI 6 A IIA ARC HI TFCTF $109207.66 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES/J-7-9 6 PI-26
APl'613 FULSAFFFDEP 3793.PP PUMP PARTS
USCF19 PAINDOW DISFOSAL CO. 1461.25 TRASH DISPOSAL
P CSGA15 RE-CV-KLFEN CORP. S71.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
1,8111,16 REMEDY TEMP 1669.6G TEMPORARY SERVICES
1 0R0617 TNT REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. S846.01
PIPE SUPPLIES
CRCIR REKNOPO, INC. $39.61 A
0639 RICHARDS, WATSON, DPEYFUSS f72.P6 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
0
• 0q OE20 POUR INS 1 MYCRS INC. 1713.P0 LEGAL SERVICES/WRIT OF MANDATE ACTION
I- POG6p1 ROCCO•S TRUCK WRECKING S225.00 PUMP PARTS
CA0622 SANCON ENGINEERING , INC. $621.00 TRUCK PARTS
COAT ACID CONTAINMENT SLAB
I (S1'623 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC POTOPS 1}39.EP ELECTRIC MOTOR
i Ag3674 SCIENCE APPLICATION TNT IL CORE SRSr 7i7.50 OCEAN MONITORING
Y" ONC6p5 SEA COAST DESIGNS $192.45 OFFICE MONITORFURNITUING
OS CA26 SHAPROCN SUPPLY f9E.15
r uP 66F7 SIONA CNERGv SYSTCHS $194.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES
' I PUMP PARTS
t-J LPIFpP SKYPARK WALK-IN PCOTUL CLINIC $695.00
MS
GPn(29 SMITH-1'PERY CO. 321.30 EMPLOYEE TESTING fKE.
^� F.e Oe30 SOLPAq COPF. f755.25 CONCRETE TESTING
'• i H qR Gf31 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. fP9399.19 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE .
A POWER
' '--' 000632 $O.SOUTHERN
C UNTIE CO. $19.99
I - WATER USAGE
EL
f'V CPCRS3 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 31]rA99.65 DIESEL FUEL
N OB(A34 STAROV STEEL f792.7K STEEL 1
6R(635 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. f1.U70.95 TOOLS
i'j
OSLA36 SUNSET FORD $33.40 TRUCK PARTS
� •� �� OR0R37 THE SUPFLIF.RS $39.61 TOOLS
08063P TAP PRODUCTS CO. 1439.52 E SUPPLIES
OFFICE pe(639 111UPPSON LACQUER CO. 365P.9A OFFICINT SUPPLIES
OS1•A90 IRANSMERIDIAN CHEMICALS, INC. S2,912.94 CAUSTIC SODA
081.6A1 TRAVEL TRAVEL $1,121.110 AIR FARE
I. I OBOA92 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY9 INC. $794.25 TRUCK PARTS
"PUE93 J.G. TUCKER R SON, INC. 3979.1E
I ' DELIVERY
SUPPLIES
(. G60645 U.STLO PARCEL SCRVIC F. SISR.Gs DELIVERY SERVICE
OB06A5 U.S. EQUIPMENT C CO., INC. tk.W$5,123.Gs
10 EQUIPMENT PARTS
OPP69F. VAL SCIENTIFIC f5r120.1P LAB SUPPLIES
08P697 VALLEY CITIES SUC FLY CO. S3,401.51 PIPE SUPPLIES
DGP69P VALVE SERVICLSr INC. $752.37 VALVE REPAIR
I 'i g
a
w; I Nr
D PROCESSING SSING DATE 6/0F/RY PAGE
I FUNP NO "I"^ .II CISI NORAINC CAFITAL '
REPORT MU"Ur..R AN9!.
CCUN.TY 7,eNI1Al ION DISTRICTS DF OP4ND7 CPUNIY " 1
CLAIMS I'7IO 06/11/A6
!
WAPPAMi It'. It'NDOR AROUN T 01 SC F!C T!ON
,
L'p Cnne VAP FC. INC. s},7R9.26 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
G8645o VALLAEt 1. TIFRI.AN 06T.47 PUMP PARTS
I.,. eDFPJ JOHN N. NAFLF.5 $438.13 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT
^F!G•7 Le LNFSRe rNFINt SERVICENTCF S2,571.81 ENGINE PARTS
} � OP:eSa WCSIPINSTER GLASS L MIRROR 454.6P. GLASS
I`P4E 5o WIIITTA FINE B VCRVILLE s5,196.52 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY
GP:E55 WITEG SCIENTIFIC 154.56 LAB SUPPLIES
CRPF56 KENOV CORP. S20RT.18 COPIER LEASE
}.D $637.12 ELECTRICAL PARTS
��� [86F59 OEORGF. POROLEY ASSOCIATES 31,413.T6
;nl P8:!Rttl ZIPRIC TEMPORARY f[R SO NNFL DIRECTOTEMPORARS SERVICES
t 9P 3t 5y RICH A0.0 E. RUCK $26T.1} DIRECTORS CORP. 4 NI LEAGE
D
f TOTAL CL1INc PAID P(./Il/vE FOI0.603.99
t
SUMMARY MOUNT
4✓
71 OPEN FUND S 1,000.75
' II 72 OPER FUND _.. . 1,269.50 - -
12 ACO FUND 360.50
(- 12 F/N FUND 31 211.61 _.
r /3 OPER FUND 1:388.64
15 OPER FUND 946.81
f` 15 ACO FUND 360.00 ..
^X) 77 OPEN FUND 7,4I1.50
/7 F/N FUND 79,215.41
( /11 OPER FUND 60.03
114 ACO FUND 480.00 -
C1 7566 OPER FUND 18.35
(' -4 7647 OPER FUND 3.693.81
JT OPEN FUND 337,580.82
�.I CORF 256,403.79
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 8,209.76
JT WORKING CAPITAL 81,072.21
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/11/86 $810,683.49
L.'
II
II
�.I
4 r
00 FUND NP 'N^` .• .O 1'NIMG• G.A...... I'FOCLSSINL WAIF 4/1^/nA FAGF i
1� REPORT FIIIMIII I• IF.,
7., 0 FININTv .^ANITATION CIST7ICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
I CL AIPS LAID ]A/29/I.
I ' WARRANT NO. YL Pp(P AMOUR PCSCDIPTION
CPEL 75 ADC VCI%L' fIDFFLY. INC. $1...22.3F STEEL
L� CpCG16 AGH IIi.CTRONIC<* INC. 1211.34 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PP5f47 trM FLF1Y90RICS.INC. 516S.13 ELECTRIC ALARM
CUCA7A CCCO.ONIRT •M ropy $67�1.19 PRINTING
O0CA7R LINCOLN CAPTC75 A INTF P.IORS S2 013.R3 INSTALL TILE-PLT. 1
� j 08?610 ADAMSON INnU9TPl C.R. INC. 3121.35 LAB SUPPLIES
".
A � CNp6P1 ADVANCED rmc. SCRYICLS SAY 1.29 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
901603 0190CUMG. Inks 4P d91.99 ENGINEERING PI-26 A P2-33
�.� pP^APT AIR role sSIRVI INC, S15.14 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
.PAY PP0AP9 AIR PN0T0 SERVICE` 133R.11 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTIONS
Cp C6P9 AIR nOOVt TF A CHEMICAL I[AL INC.. f70:N A.73 IMPLEMENT COMPUTERIZED PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
0006N6 ALL AMEAICAN ASp HALT
127.29 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
9PpAAi ALC-STATE VCHICLCS. INC.. 51.19A.19 VEHICLE LEASE
0AP0pp ALLIS-CHALMERS CORP. 52.116.93 - PUMA PARTS
�q APO 6P? ALLIS-CHALPEPS EQUIPMENT SPY. 52.019.60 PUMP PARTS
04:6?1 ALTA SALES. INC.. $71.73 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
G O UF81 AMERICAN CYANAMID 122.392.53 CATIONIC POLYMER
9MPF92 AMERICAN FLEET PARTS .657.59 TRUCK PARTS
90 (193 AMCXICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $63.62 LAB SUPPLIES
C3 PP96e1 ANALADS %260.PD - LAB SERVICES
tl 040695 THE ANCHOR. PACKING CO. 1321.1P MECHANICAL PARTS
Op16?6 ANGELICA RCNTAL SERVICES GPOUP 1122.P0 TOWEL RENTAL
Op1R97 AOVA PCN CORP. $5.47^.27 ANIONIC POLYMER
OOF6911 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC COPP. $237.03 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
RP9F99 IHE AT A SF RAILWAY CO. TLS6.12 TRACK REMOVAL 6 REPLACEMENT/CONTR. 2-6-2
08070P PTCMIC SPECTROSCOPY 18 AO PUBLICATION
1 b Y01701 PAN CORPORATION $3,724.71 SLUDGE DISPOSAL
�(q 04970. 6SI CONSULTANTS. INC. S2.I19.26 ENGINEERING PW-100
}S4V.1 OSE703 BANK OF ARCRICA N7 C SA L1.663.56 TRAVEL EXPENSE ,
! 0691C1 BEACON DAY ENTFPPP.ISEP. INC. 175.10 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
nl
000795 PE.CKMAN INOUSTRIAL/PROCESS 52.296.41 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
I.Q O89706 PECKHAM INDUSTRIAL CO. - - - - 1511.17"" - - INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
ORN707 PEKOE' MACHINE INC. 5950.09 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
pRL7nP PCVCO IRCUSTNIAL VEHICLES A15.A1 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
L1 CR0749 OMS/PIG. ROR 54:910.00 TRASH DISPOSAL
0011719 PUCKEYE GAS PRODUCTS $21.21 PROPANE
OPB711 BUILDING NEWS, INC. SI15.17 PUBLICATION
080712 THE PURKF COMPANY $185.55 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
•i n47i13 PURKE ENGINFERINC CO. 1131.0E ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
OP 07I/ NIL LI AK H. OU ILEA 1303.92 PETTY CASH
.� P9F715 CPT CALIFORNIA, INC. $3.018.19 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
OP9716 CS COP-ANY 5153.P0 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
680717 CAL-FAP.TITIONS. IIlC. SI.119.DO OFFICE FURNITURE
080719 CAL SOUTH FQUIGNFWT CO. 11.014.05 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
OBC719 CALTROL . INC. 1411.17 VALVES
ItF OR9723 CALIFOPRIA CONTROLS CO. 3116.92 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
r
b7 PUMP Nr 1 JI PI3I WIIAKINC CAPITAL PPOCr55IN6 DAIF 1/1+/PA PAST
REPORT NUMHEA AP43
N COUIITV C.ANTTATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CCU TIT
Y
CLAINS rAIO +A/+5/A6
�.; WARRANT I:D, Vr NPOR AMOUNT rr:rPlrTlm:
I OPC'711 CALIFO9NIn rIRIL R TINTER Sv0.26 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
9k1`772 rALC C.AP.PA 11R7.64 CAMERA SUPPLIES
CA 97B3 rAATLL C4MTPDLS. INC. 327A.17 VALVE
PP'1724 Cr IT ICD SY I ICPS TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
OPC725 CArHREST INDUSTRIES. INC. S1S.]v 6.^D FERRIC CHLORIDE
00A726 A.V. CHLATEPTON CO. 3155.26 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
rP9727 C`TVRON U.S.A.. INC. $4,955.62 GASOLINE/OIL
RR0720 rIIrVRON USA. INC. 132.67 FISH
OpR O 729 CHICU ARL FISH FARM $54.00
T 1.80730 P.O. CLAFP CO.. INC. $91.98 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
981731 C.I.C."•. . [0. I IN r. $723.19 PUMP REPAIR
7P9732 CO NNI L G.N. PaPIS / DIY. 1145.75 TRUCK PARTS
064733 CONSOLIDATEO ELECTRICAL GIST. $5,629.57 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
009734 CONSOLIDATED RrPROGRAPHICS - - $444.44 - BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTION
!` O119735 CONTROL DATA CORPORATION SI.Ivl.00 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR.
001736 lil CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY 1144.41 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
E80737 COUNTY ENERGY SERVICES1171.71 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
OPPTR ELECTRIC
COUNTY VHOLC54LC ELECTT RIC $213.33 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
OPn759 CAL WATER 1395.25 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL
QPP74R10 STATE OF CALIFDRNTa - ""' $19.08- - " PUBLICATION
PAP? STATE OF CALIF CAN IA 1160.00 PROCESSING FEE/ANNEX. 62/015T. 12
I 100742 PRE. INC. $665.25 PIPE SUPPLIES
:r I' CA 0747 TNC O.N.N. CROUPi INC. - tR42:P5 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES/PARCEL BILLING FILES
r 08)7A4 DAILY rIL CI f.11.84 LEGAL ADVERTISING
060745 DANICLS TIRE SERVICE s11230.53 _ TRUCK PARTS
080146 M.A. OIARCY COMPANY - - --' - 9I042S65" EQUIPMENT PARTS
�y OBC T4T DECO, $509.3v w ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
w 0007-8 CC 6UEDLC 8 SONS SGLASSERVICE
CO. $495.35 GLASS
�01000750 CEW-PAP SALES GIST A SERVICE - 1150.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
ORU750 DIESEL LOGISTICS. INC. $964.22 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
' OB'1751 DIFILICPO ASSOCIATES f969.22 PRINTING
+ 080752 DIGITAL r9UIPMENT COPY. - -' - ' SV12:00 - '
INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
085753 PURACO INTERN INSECT INC. 3$3.563.28 REPAIR COLD BOX-PLY. 2
68075v PUP-AS DIESEL INJECTION $1,955.17 PUMP PARTS
ii 6BO 756 DUNX EOVAROS CPPP. 11:955.17 PAINT SUPPLIES
OBC757 EALNIL CORP. 121580.OU LAB SUPPLIES
OAP� { 68075A EASTMA EA US r130.V0 DEFERRED COMP. DISTRIBUTION
0007511 FASTMAN. INC. l2$217.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES
�•� DB0760 LC2El $390.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES
O8V160 NALLOYAI FAIRIES 3390.00 DEFERRED COMP. DISTRIBUTION
I 080762 FEDERAL SDPCOOEP CO., AMC. 39.2R R.r0
SLUDGE GRSERVI
FpU762 FEDERAL CvPD[SS CORP. fl 1.OO RELIVE RY SERVICE
DPP 713 FILAR SUPPLY CO, 3779,38 ELECTRICAL SUPP
� I OB076A rISCIIEP A FORT FIT Co. SIi109:33 INSTRUMENTATIONLIES SUPPLIES
000A5 IORPULAPS. INC. 3168.09 OPERATIONS SUPPLIES
h 060766 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT S1.APIi3T PAINT SUPPLIES
l.
A OF
FUND NO "I° .II b1t1 VONKINIi CAI IIAL rp DCESSIHII 11411. P/1'!/PL IA6E
LZ
I PF PO PI KUBOTA AT`,
A/J CBIINTV SAN.ITATIBN GISTPICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 36/25/06
y ppP AMT Nf. VI Nf.UP AMnWNT BESCI'IrTTON
OR I'iM1 SSCCIATES t011.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT
9e070P InANf I. CCPI'rl.S9Dp rPOPUCT St.CI R.t4 EQUIPMENT PARTS
000769 In44PL IN -TLLrP . INC. S1.207.00 SLUDGE GRINDER
,i 080770 INILWAY Tr DCK FAPTS ' S2.295.76 TRUCK PARTS
,I CP9171 FRUIT ONOfrRR LADOPATORY. INC. 131.00 LAB SERVICES
OBC772 CITY 11F FULLrRTON $117.96 WATER USAGE
O p0 773 TItUCK L PUS GROUP/CM 57018.16 TRUCK
OP0774 AANAHL LONGER Co. S1:095.07 LUMBER
98C775 GANDALF DATA INC. S2.319.A6 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
.� UBD776 CASKET ENGINCEPING $127.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
OP f,777 OCMLRAL iFLFFHONE CO. "S31310.77 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES
Op077P GIEIILICII-MIICHELL. INC. $10.103.93 VERTICAL GRIDS
08AT?9 GOULD INC. $510.00 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
000780 M•D INSTRIIHrNT COMPANY S299.44 "' - " INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
/' rr 0807P1 GEORGE T. POLL CO. S92.64 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES '
f#V li 089782 FRLD A. HARPER 9425.U4 TRAVEL EXPENSE
OR 17M Ck PRINATON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS "' 94061109 -""" INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
9R07P4 HOEROIGCR C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 7379.48 EQUIPMENT PARTS
984785 HOOPER CANTOR STOPES 1482.60 CAMERA SUPPLIES
I•-' 084786 CITY OF PUNTINGTON BEACH "' ' S17.R7 WATER USAGE
VB07B7 CITY OF IWNTINOTON BEACH 935,917.00 REIMBURSE MANHOLE REPAIRS
.1 .y OTTY78P. HYCROIEX S99S.66 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
OBOTA9 IMPERIAL WFST CHEMICAL " " -S3491.59 " FERROUS CHLORIDE
if' JP079p INDIAN SPRINGS MFG, CO.. INC. $71.72 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
08P 791 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS S492.47 HARDWARE
00 A 792 INGR 4X PAPER - "" "" "' """"" "" f51 R:30 -' ` ' - OFFICE SUPPLIES
08079S IN PLACE MACHINING CO. SI r045.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
080794 INTEPN6TIONAL TECHNOLOGY S2119.110 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
1!141!795 GLENN P. JAMESON S457:00 ENGINEERING PI-28 A PI-26
(. 080796 INE JANITOR'S SHOPPC 1427.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
DOD797 JONFS CMCMICALS. INC. 115.0136.96 CHLORINE
t80798 KAMAN 9EARINGS A SUPPLY $482.31""' " '" BEARINGS
G 080794 NEEN-MITT ABRASIVE CO. S3AI.60 TOOLS
"'A"
ACENAN SUPPLY S610.7R MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
6P0BOl KING 9C ARING. INC. %I.Its
2.R5 BEARINGS
OP.5 P 0 2 rONALO E. NINNCY N90.P0 DEFERRED COMP. DISTRIBUTION
I,. pP9p B3 KIRPT PUMP R MACHINE WORKS 1430.11 PUMP PARTS
POCS04 FR. MARTIN NORnICK. SR. 12.170.R0 ENGIIEERING 2-25
PPOAM1S L R N UN IFDRM SUPPLY CB 15.311.90 UNIFORM RENTAL
OR0 R06 L.A. LIO1110 HANDLING SYSTEMS T44.99 PUMPS
L.I OBr P A 7 CENCO ELECTRIC CO. SRP5.72 TRUCK PARTS
' •� OR C PPIT LI"TING OISTRIOUTOPS, INC. STO.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
08[K09 LILLY TYPESETTING 5179.L0 PRINTING
CBpBlO Y.P. LINDSTROM. INC. list.?? - PCB CONTROL PROGRAM
0Po611 LOC ANGELES TIMES S1.703.04 LEGAL ADVERTISING
OP PN12 t.OWNY R AgPUC1ATES SI50.[A ENGINEERING 2-24
.. 41 -
r
t"rum MO '.1' .11 f111 WOPPING CAPIIAI rpOCESSIN6 1Ufr 6/1�/PA fARf A
y� RCPORI NUMPLR Afh!
f.P11N1V SANITATION PTSIRTCTS Or 08ANGE COUNTY
CLAIRE H'ATD :6/25/F6
i-, WARRANT tic. VI NrPR AMOUNT fa sr-If T ION
j I OR Irn IS PA M1C nA41 VALVr CLRr. 1667.74 VALVE
rBCPI4 pA lk rpANr rfRVICIS 160?3.90
CAL 15 xe.lOA IGCk .1Ur PLY S197.A2 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
HLECTRRE
IC
j OP".PIA MARVAC LLLCIR DIINC. t297.9A ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
OPCR17 MATT - CNLOIlFft .. INC. 1239.32 CHLORINATION EQUIPMENT
BROAIR PCCCY SPrll METAL WORKS. INf.. 5306.66 EQUIPMENT PARTS
0P0P1^ MCMACTCP-CUR SUPPLY CO. SI3RIi
368. 1 MECHAIII CAL SUPPLIES O60RJ0 PENS CP. INC.INf. f35@d CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
I•' 3- DR PA21 PICFO NOTION 1691.37 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
0ROp22 MIPC SLFr TY APPLIANCES CO. 11.855.39
Erl ARC.P23 MOTOROLA, INC. $18,833.97 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
"I 2 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
C7 OOUA24 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $57.62 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
3:- DRpp25 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. $35.562.P2 BULK CHLORINE
OF0526 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. '" G496171 HYDROCHLORIC ACID
Y` 1.e082T CHANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $12.19 ELECTRICAL PARTS
A R1 O8OR2P ORO46C VALVE. R FITTING CO. 12,052.63 PIPE SUPPLIES
Ij 3 0P 0.829 OVFPI'CAD DOOR CO OF OPANOC CTY "- $230:00 DOOR REPAIR
POPP30 CYYGrh SERVICE 1659.3O OXYGEN
it N DROR31 COUNTY OF ORAMOE $2.110.20 COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT
p 9NrP32 CO. OF ORANGE•AUDITOR CONTROLLER - - TI52:A79:00 SLUDGE DISPOSAL
" 089e33 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $7.998.75 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND
"BrA34 PACIFIC Mr CNANICAL SUPPLY 5495.35 PUMP PARTS
y 08O835 PACIFIC SAFETY EOVIPHENT CO. 1606.93 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
PS I r DP6P.36 PACIFIC BELL 9786.42 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES
r- OOAA37 PACIFIC YELPING R MANUFACTUPING S124.23 __ WELDING SUPPLIES
t. 0
I �. t=) rR0238 FARAGOP. PUSINESS SYSTEMS - - - - -3R98:00 - COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES
llllllPRON39 ROY PENDERRRAFT fA9 D.DD DEFERRED COMP. DISTRIBUTION
W CRVA41 -Er POTS t7T.P9 BICYCLE SUPPLIES
I --I Delphi POPTFR MOILER SERVICE, INC. SSS.FS
3ENGINE PARTS
'� O80842 POWER TRAIN INDUSTRIES t276.15 TRUCK PARTS
An 080P.0 HAROLD PPIRROSE ICE $60.00 ICE
--1 099044 rRO6PESSIVC STEEL SUPPLY "3391:30 STEEL
W OR^P.5 QUALITY OUILDING SUPPLY SOO.28 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
98f P.6 QUORUM INTCPNATIONAL UNLTD. 533.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES
O110A47 TH= PEC,ISTfR 449.98 LEGAL ADVERTISING
0808A8 PEFEOY TEMr 0610.56 TEMPORARY SERVICES
L. 880R.. THE PCr URLIC SUPPLY CO. 1126.88 PIPE SUPPLIES
RepPe RICHARD•S HYDRAULICS $73:13 TRUCK PARTS
. •L. 08Ue51 Nicoll CORP 1356.69 COPIER LEASE
OP0852 pOMES AUTO TRIM SIe1.60 TRUCK PARTS
080p53 SAODLCPACN SRrEDOMETCR 4131.17 TRUCK PARTS
L{ 01,1054 SCH•r EFCk DIXON ASSOCIATES 3675.90 SOILS TESTING
I� DBOPtS SrA COAST DFSIGNE 5137.P0 OFFICE FURNITURE
P11216 SFAR1, ROCRUCK AND CO. 1175.7C PUMP PUTS
(1 000FF7 GHAMROCN SUPPLY 142.15 SAFETY SUPPLIES
{{11 9BOPS0 SVYPARK VALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC i1.I91.nC EMPLOYEE MEDICAL EXAM
. '. z
l"A FUND NO nl"^ - JI PI^-T WIIPMING CAI'I71L FROCFIGIMF PAIL A/19/MF PAGE
I RFPOPT PUNIER IC13
�Sn COUNTY SANITATION OISTPICT4 OF OPANOE COUNTY
CLAIMS VPIO 06/15/06 '
WAPRANT Fn. VFNI-CF FMnUNT 1'C•CnIFTION 1
1 I DPptl 6n .NIII•-FI!T^v co, •S}6.:f.
UR r,pRr b1 AF L/S - CONCRETE TESTING
`.vTTR CO., INC., f2••16T.P0 TRUCK PARTS
. � ^PCPAI <OI MAF COFA. S9.9}4.7}
1 RU
SAPPAP SOUPI COAST DOUGC 121P.91 T
11 PPAAAS SO. CALIF COASTAL VATFP 3139R6}C.00 TRUCCKK CULTURES FOR DIGESTER CLEANING
PARTS
A
0"A SOU TERN CALIFNUAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION
. o. POWER
Can9R RE S SO. CAL. C,A9 CA.EUI SON CO.Cp. 33I$25,9B39.29 37.73 NATURAL GAS
nP9P66 S9UTRFP9 COUNTIES OIL CO. 93.642.74 DIESEL FUEL
!n PBAPFT SPARALFTIS DRINKING WATER 1991.18 BOTTLED WATER
'.G1 pRnBRA STAINLESS flPF A FITTING Cr. 3P22.72 PIPE SUPPLIES
�IT1 pPURF9 STAR TOOL 9 SUPPLY CO. S20AI.36 TOOLS
T S8Y670 SCOTT STEVENS $18.06 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
i'
nP9k7l STONNAFO, INC. $339.15 GRIT EQUIPMENT
yPF872 SUNV IT STEEL _' ,2 . ' ALUMINUM TUBING
✓ Iti ^NN YTS IMF TUIELI FRS $9 25151.9191 SAFETY SUPPLIES
OB0R 14 -SVCETV flD CO. 142.P0 ALUMINUM TUBING
J$. FBC.OT} CASTLE / DIV. OF SYPRDN COPP. 3212.PC LAB EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
OP6P76 THOMPSON LACGULR CO. SR.46
PAINT SUPPLIES
GprPT9 TROJAN ERICA DEL SVAL S86.609.00 ENGINE REPPIR
O8474`79P1979 TRUCK, GASKET R SUPPLY; INC. f2TR.19 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
(' 0R9PT9 TRUCK, A AUTO SUPPLY, INC. $1,21 TRUCK PARTS 1
oatree J.O. TUCKER A SON. INC. 3957.65 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
' PRnP81 UNOCAL ""' 138:13 GASOLINE
080PR2 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3179.14 DELIVERY SERVICE
OROE83 UNIVERSAL MACK 3SR4.14
_ TRUCK RR
CP.G P09 Y.O:C. TESTING "" _ '-- "'- 'fi '9OO:DO'"
DIGESTER GAS TESTING
{' Ib CPYBRS YNR SC IFNTIFIE 52.54. LAB SUPPLIES
CR GPPR V4LL FY CITI F.S RUP PLY CO. $1.6
559
y PIPE SUPPLIES
- pRCBRT VALYF SF.RVICCSr INC. 015:9P EQUIPMENT REPAIR
�. � 9P1'P.BB VIRTU. INC. $4 39 S498.4^ DIGESTION EQUIPMENT
BPGEP9 V9R iFp INDUSTRIES _ f998.90 DOOR REPAIR
F RE890 CRRL WAPPFN A CO, S751:09'_' " ' WORKERS COMP. ADMINISTRATION
iCf) OPC1,91 WAPPINGTON $123.U0 LAB SUPPLIES
CBpP92 VCLLS HARING $3,242.79
REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT
I,I CB l'P93 VEST COAST INSTALLATIONS $600.00 OFFICE FURNITURE
nP A A99 L'ESTF.RN WIFE R EALLOYRVIL 3296.99 PUMP PARTS
L.I OBF896 WHIRL. FI NP E YCR VI LLE 32.393.21 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY
OBP096 ROUBRE G IVCDOPUFFNDUSTRIES
311i 12I.BO LEGAL SERVICES
".R n B9T KAVIER INDUSTR ICS 167.114 LAB SUPPLIES
PEVP9B YCP.OK CUAr, 31.3RR.65 COPIER LEASE
1 PPn849 FEOp GF YAR OLEY ASSOCIATES R293.01
090E CVEREIT N. YOPK CO. $365.91_ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
1Pnn01 2IC 1EMPORARY PFRSORNFL S696.311 ENGINE PARTS
TEMPORARY SERVICES
"I TOTAL CLAIMS PAID v6/2L''/A6 _ _11.270,39R.96
I FUND NO 9199 - JT WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/19/86 PAGE 6
ol
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANr.E COUNTY
I, CLAIMS PAID 06/25/86
SUMMARY AMOUNT
I /1 OPEN FUND S 1.278.85
/1 AGO FUND 103.50
/2 UPER FUND 3,640.24
/3 a[0 FUND 3.922.19
/2 F/R FUND 150.00
/3 OPER FUND 41,153.53
n /3 AGO FUND 287.03
j' M /5 OPER FUND 71348,96
[ FF3 /5 ACO FUND 51.80
/6 OPER FUND 436.76
I' D /6 AGO FUND 55.63 -
j /7 OPER FUND 4.243.76
/7 AGE) FUND 56.96
/11 OPER FUND
F Im 14,277.45
; 3 /14 AGO FUND 605.27
/566 OPEN FUND 2,808.99
I �tk /566 ACE) FUND
j 1— /697 OPER FUND
4,423.30
JT OPER FUND $09,393.98
I I CORF 159,929,59- - - - -
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 10,145.34
D JT WORKING CAPITAL
1.1 E— 206,052.94
1- .. .. .
CJ
IC� rorpL CLp1ns Pplo 06/25/86 51,270,398.96
Cn
to
..1
It
i.'
- I
I•�
I.'
to
RESOLUTION NO. 86-63-1
AUTHORIZID3. FILING FOR FEDERAL APED STATE GRANTS -
1986-87 JOINT WORKS IMPROVEMMM AND ADDITIONS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZIN., APED DIRECTING E=TION APED FILING OF
DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C.
1251 Er SEQ., AND STATE GRANT UNDER CLEAN WATER BOND
TAW OF 1970 APED/OR 1974, ON BEHALF OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 APED 14 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, APED PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C., 1251 at seq.) provides for Federal grants for
construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. The State Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 and/or 1974 authorizes
the State Water Resources Control Board to enter into contracts with public
agencies for State grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 3. County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County is a separate
and distinct agency organize] under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5, of the Health
and Safety Code of the State of California, for the purpose of constructing,
operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage
from the cities and other local sewering agencies, and has joined with other
County Sanitation Districts; namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14, in constructing, operating and maintaining joint sewage
treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated July 1, 1970,
as amended, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement.
"C-1" AGENDA ITEM 11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1"
Section 4. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Ownership, Operation
and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County
`.d acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, each organized for similar purposes
and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California, for the
purpose of constructing and operating said joint sewage treatment plants and
disposal facilities.
Section 5. By means of this resolution and of the resolutions set forth
below by number, the following County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, have authorized the filing of applications for grants under said Act
of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Law and have authorized County Sanitation
District No. 1 to file said application in their behalf.
DISTRICT NO. RESOUNION NO.
2 86-64-2
3 86-65-3
`.,.� 5 86-66-5
6 86-67-6
7 86-68-7
11 86-69-11
13 86-70-13
14 86-71-14
Section 6. J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manages, is hereby authorized and
directed to sign and file for and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 1,
acting for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14, Application for a Federal Grant for Sewage Treatment Works
under 33 U.S.C., 1251 et seq., and a State Grant for Clean %ater under the Clean
"C-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2"
water Bond Law of 1970 and/or 1974, for a joint project generally described as
follows:
1986-87 Joint works Improvements and Additions
Section 7. District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, hereby agrees and further
does authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if a Federal
grant for its project is made pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C. , 1251 et seq.) it will pay the remaining cost of the
approved project; it will provide proper and efficient operation and maintenance
of the approved project after completion of construction thereof; it will canply
with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (F.L. 88-352) and the regulations
issued pursuant thereto and state that the Assurance of Canpliance with such
regulation attached to the application for Federal grant applies to this project;
and it will cmply with requirements of Executive Order 11246' pertaining to equal
snploya - t opportunity in Federally-assisted construction contracts.
PASSED APED ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"C-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-72
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR JOB NO. P1-23R
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 AND 19 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT
OF PRIMARY BASINS 1 AMID 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB
NO. P1-23R
WHEREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and
specifications for Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-23R.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 19 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have
concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby
determine that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements;
and,
Section 2. That the project for Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-23R, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file
any doom eats required by said Guidelines Inpleme;ting the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this
day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers,
Districts' engineers, for Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-23R, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
"D-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1"
Section 9. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids
for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of
California; and,
Section 5. That the General tanager be authorized to establish the date and
time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or
his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED ACID ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"D-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-73
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR JOB ND. P2-30
.s
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, Ll, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION
OF DOMES AND INSTALLATION OF SLUDGE PUMP MIXING
SYSTEMS FOR DIGESTERS "E" AND "H" AT PLANT NO. 2,
JOB NO. P2-30
i+7HEREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and
specifications for Rehabilitation of Danes and Installation of Sludge Pump Mixing
Systems for Digesters "E" and "H" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-30.
NON, THEREFDRE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have
V✓ concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby
determine that said project is categorically exempt fran further CDQA requirements;
and,
Section 2. That the project for Rehabilitation of Danes and Installation of
Sludge Pump Mixing Systems for Digesters "E" and "H" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-30,
is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required
by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended; and,
Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this
day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Kennedy/Jenks Engineers, Districts'
engineers, for Rehabilitation of Dews and Installation of Sludge Pump Mixing System
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1"
for Digesters "^c" and "H" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-30, are hereby approve] and
adopted; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids �..�
for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of
California; and,
Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and
tim= at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or
his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Hoards of Directors.
PASSED AMID ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
�✓ GRANT NO. N/A
C. 0. NO. Two 2
CONTRACTOR: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. DATE June 11, 1986
JOB: INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT OF CENTRIFUGES WITH BELT FILTER PRESSES
AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-21
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 28,417.63
In accordance with contract provisions, the following chan9g s in the contr ct
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, tie
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 REROUTE DRAIN LINES
The contractor was directed to reroute two (2) drainage lines which were
discharging water into a centrate box in the centrifuge area. This reroute
was necessary as the area was scheduled for demolition under this contract.
(Reference FCO 61)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 2,091.52
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 6 Calendar Days
Item 2 TEMPORARY B-INCH DRAIN LINE
The contractor was directed to install a temporary 8-inch digester drain line
with victaulic ends and fittings. This line was needed by Maintenance for
scheduled digester cleaning. Existing digester drain lines were cut off as
part of the demolition of the Centrifuge Building on this contract. (Reference
FCO M2)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 18,598.26
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 17 Calendar Days
Item 3 ADDITIONAL SLUDGE LINE
The contractor was directed to install an additional sludge line in the main
tunnel from Digesters 3 and S. The original sludge lines were to be demolished
under this contract. (Reference FCO M3)
_ ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 7,727.85
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 7 Calendar Days
"F-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
GRANT NO. N/A
C. 0. NO. Two 2
CONTRACTOR: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. DATE June 11,
JOB: INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT OF CENTRIFUGES WITH BELT FILTER PRESSES
AT PLANT .. 1, JOB N . P -
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 28,417.63
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 30 Calendar Days
The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to
the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract plus the 30
days time extension granted hereby. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no
time extension other than the 30 days approved herein is required for this change
order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses
have been or will be incurred by contractor.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date January 21, 1986
Original Contract Time 550 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date July 24, 1987
Time Extension this C.O. 30 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 30 Calendar Days �..
Revised Contract Time 580 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date August 23, 1987
Original Contract Price $ 4,618,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0
This Change (Add) (Gedwes) $ 419b—
Amended Contract Price $ A3
�Rnard Authorization Date: July 9, 1986
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
Construction Manager
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
_ ACCEPTED BY: APP BY:
l�
ontr ctor Director of Engineering
"F-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
GRAM NO. N/A
C. 0. NO. Two 2
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE June 1 , 1986
JOB: REHABILITATION OF BASINS 3, 4 AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1 - JOB NO. PI-24R
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 87,861.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefore, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 TWO ADDITIONAL SCUM TROUGHS
The contractor was directed to furnish and install new scum troughs including
new glasslined scum draw-off piping at Basins 3 and 4. The original contract
calls for replacing scum trough at Basin 5 only. The new scum troughs for Basins
3 and 4 were not included in the contract drawings and must be replaced as they
are deteriorated beyond repair. (Reference FCO M2)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 44,068.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 POLYURETHANE COATING
The contractor was directed to coat all ferrous metals with polyurethane coating.
The polyurethane is being used in lieu of the coal tar epoxy originally specified
below the water line on all three basins. The District has found that the
expected service life of polyurethane is much greater than that of the coal tar
epoxy. District staff has therefore requested this change.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 36,710.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
Item 3 NEW LIGHTING FIXTURES
Contractor was directed to remove and replace all mercury vapor lighting
fixtures. The fixtures were replaced with more efficient Holophane high
pressure sodium lighting fixtures. This replacement was made to bring the
plant into line for the energy management program.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,608.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
GRANT NO. N/A
C. 0. NO. Two 2
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE junk, 1986
JOB: REHABILITATION OF BASINS 3, 4 AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1 - JOB NO. PI-24R
Item 4 LAUNDER VALVE INSTALLATION
The contractor was directed to install three (3) District-furnished launder
valves. These valves were originally to be installed by another contractor as
part of Job No. PW-134. However, due to other conflicting construction in the
area, this work was deleted from Job No. PW-134, so as not to impact the
contractor' s schedule.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 5,475.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 87,861.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
GRANT NO. N/A
C. 0. NO. Two
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE June 10, 1986
JOB: REHABILITATION OF BASINS 3, 4 AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1 - JOB NO. P1-24R
The additional work contained in this change order can be
the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is,
therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this change order, and no
direct or indirect , incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or
will be incurred by Contractor.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Or`ig`1na ontrac ate January 30, 1986
Original Contract Time 310 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date December 5, 1986
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 310 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date December 5, 1986
Original Contract Price $ 2 221 961.00
`..✓ Prev. Auth. Changes $ .00
This Change (Add) (9edeet) $
Amended Contract Price
Board ut or zat on ate: July 9, 1986
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
construction on nager
ACCEPTED BY: APPR0V BY:
on rat or , Director of Engineering
i
"G-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
GRANT NO. N/A
C. 0. NO. Four 4
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE June 10, 1986
JOB: INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT BELT FILTER PRESSES AT PLANT NO. 2
JOB NO. P2-28-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Beduet) $ 3,405.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefore, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 VENT LINES
The contractor was directed to demolish an existing 3-inch PVC supernatant vent
line and repipe two vent lines to the existing belt filter press drain trough.
This demolition was inadvertantly left out of the original contract drawings.
(Reference FCO ill)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM S 1,771.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 AIR LINE
The contractor was directed to replace approximately 65 feet of 2-inch high
pressure air line in Vormitag Tunnel . This line was deteriorated beyond useful
service. (Reference FCO 612)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM S 1,634.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER E 3,405.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days
"H-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
\.s�
GRANT NO. N/A '
C. 0. NO. our
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER DATE une ti
JOB: INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT BELT FILTER PRESSES AT PLANT NO. 2
JOB NO. P2-2 -
The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental
to prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is,
therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this change order, and no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or
will be incurred by Contractor. _
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date February 24, 1986
Original Contract Time 450 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date May 19, 1987
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 450 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date May 19, 1987
Original Contract Price S 3,747 747.00
�../ Prev. Auth. Changes E3`TS 1
This Change (Add) (Dedue4) S 3,db3�b�
Amended Contract Price E2�
Board Authorization Date: July 9, 1986
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
) ,
on ruction manager
ZIEBARTH & ALPER
ACCEPTED BY: APPROV T:
40! a:
'Colitractorl- Director ot Engineering
"H-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
GRANT NO. N/A
C. 0. NO. Two
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE June 11, 1986
JOB: REHABILITATION OF BASINS "D" AND "E" AT PLANT NO. 2 - JOB NO. P2-29
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Beduet) $ 79,779.35
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefore, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 POLYURETHANE COATING
The contractor was directed to coat all ferrous metals on both Basins "D" and
"E" with polyurethane coating. The polyurethane is being used in lieu of the
coal tar epoxy originally specified. The District has found that the expected
service life of polyurethane is much greater than that of the coal tar epoxy.
District staff has therefore requested this change.
TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 77,906.35
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 NEW LIGHTING FIXTURES
Contractor was directed to remove and replace all mercury vapor lighting
fixtures. The fixtures were replaced with more efficient Holophane high
pressure sodium lighting fixtures. This replacement was made to bring the
plant into line for the energy management program.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,032.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
Item 3 LIGHTING MODIFICATIONS
The contractor was directed to revise switching for basin area lighting from
push buttons to photo electric cells and related equipment. This change was
made to bring the system into conformance with other systems within the plant,
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 841.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days
"I-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
GRANT NO. N/A
C. 0. NO. Two
CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE June 11, 1986
JOB: REHABILITATION OF BASINS "D" AND "E" AT PLANT NO. 2 - JOB NO. P2-29
The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to
the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is,
therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this change order, and no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or
will be incurred by Contractor.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date September 16, 1985
Original Contract Time 360 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date September 10, 1986
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 360 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date September 10, 1986
Original Contract Price $ 944,383.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $13
�✓ ChangeThis (Add)
Amended Contract 70 Price ) 6$ 124,897.3
Board Authorization Date: July 9, 1986
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMEND€D BY:
A, �.
Construction Manager
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
ACCEPTED BY: . r— APPR E BY:
Contractor _ Director of Engineering
"I-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
�.9 P.O. BOX 6127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 1 1
oy.o 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 927084016 `�►'
(714)902-2411
June 18, 1986
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services for the
Preparation of Master Plan of Support Facilities, Site and Security
Improvements at Treatment Plant No. 2
In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engi -
neering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with
Pulaski and Arita, Architects Incorporated for the preparation of Master Plan of
Support Facilities, Site and Security Improvements at Treatment Plant No. 2, on
an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead and profit, plus out-of-pocket
expenses, for an amount not to exceed $30,500.
Engineering Services,
including labor, overhead and
profit, not to exceed $29,000
Out-of-Pocket Expenses at cost,
not to exceed 1 500
Total , not to exceed Tit
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in
excessive profits for the consultant.
1 Grif, n /s/ on E mi h
o anon R/D� nfi nt arm BnD . mt
ice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
s Thomas M. Dawes
omas awes, rector of Engineerinj
Selection Committee
"J" AGENDA ITEM #11(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "J"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-74
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH PULASKI AND ARITA,
ARCHITECTS RE PREPARATION OF MASTER PLAN OF
\� SUPPORT FACILITIES, SITE AND SECURITY
IMPROVEMENTS AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13
AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AGREEMENT WITH PULASKI AND ARITA, ARCHITECTS RE
PREPARATION OF MASTER PLAN OF SUPPORT FACILITIES,
SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy
establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and
architectural services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on May 14,
1986, an agreement has been negotiated with Pulaski and Arita, Architects to
prepare a Master Plan of Support Facilities, Site and Security Improvements at
Treatment Plant No. 2; and,
WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures,
has certified the final negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and
between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County and Pulaski and Arita, Architects to prepare a Master Plan of
Support Facilities, Site and Security Improvements at Treatment Plant No. 2, is
hereby approved and accepted; and,
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(h)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1"
Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in
accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows:
Engineering Services k../
including labor, overhead and
profit, not to exceed.. .. . .. . .. . . ... . .. $29,000.00
Out-of-Pocket Expenses at cost,
not to exceed. . . .. ... .. . .. ... .. .. . . . ... 1,500.00
TOTAL, not to exceed. . . .. .. . . . . . . .. $30,500.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"K-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(h)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2"
I; ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
i OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
1 ry, . 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962.2411
June 18, 1986
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services for the
Design of Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee
with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the design of Entrances, Site, Security
and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, on an hourly-rate
basis including labor and overhead, plus out-of-pocket expenses and profit, for
an amount not to exceed $60,159.
Engineering Services, including
labor and overhead, not to exceed $54,799
Out-of-Pocket Expenses, at cost,
not to exceed 500
Fixed Profit 4,860
Total, not to exceed To-1m
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in
excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/Don R. Griffin /s/Don E. Smith
n R. Griffin, oint airman 15—on—E-79mith, Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/S/Thomas M. Dawes
omas . Dawes, Director of EngineeFing
Selection Committee
"L" AGENDA ITEM #11(I ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-76
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING
CORPORATION RE DESIGN OF ENTRANCES, SITE,
SECURITY AND INTERIOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT
PLANT NO. 1 , JOB NO. P1-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING
CORPORATION RE DESIGN OF ENTRANCES, SITE, SECURITY AND INTERIOR
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1 , JOB NO. P1-27
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy
establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and
architectural services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on May 14,
1986, an agreement has been negotiated with Boyle Engineering Corporation to
design Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-27; and,
WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures,
has certified the final negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and
between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County and Boyle Engineering Corporation to design Entrances, Site,
Security and Interior Road, Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
"M-1" AGENDA ITEM #11( i ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-1"
Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in
accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows:
Engineering Services
\ftw/ including labor and overhead,
not to exceed. . . .. . .. . . . . . ... .... . .. . . $54,799.00
Out-of-Pocket Expenses at cost,
not to exceed. .. . ... ... . . . ....... .. ... 500.00
Fixed Profit.. . .. .... .. . . . . . . ... ... . .. .. 4,860.00
TOTAL, not to exceed... . .. . . .. .. . .. $60,159.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"M-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(i ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
a
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
�f r • P.O.BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-6127 l
10944 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708.7018
(714)962.2411
June 18, 1986
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services for the
Design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19
In accordance with the Districts ' procedures for selection of professional engi-
neering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with
Brown and Caldwell for pre-design work on the Central Power Generation Systems,
Job No. J-19, on an hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead, pluss out-
of-pocket expenses and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed $252,958.
Engineering Services, including
labor and overhead at 185%,
not to exceed $217,385
Out-of-Pocket Expenses, at cost,
not to exceed 3,500
Fixed Profit 32 073
Total , not to exceed $252,958
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in
excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/Don R. Griffin /s/Don E. Smith
Don R. Griffin, Joint Chairman Don E. Smith, Vice Joint Chairman
Selection, Committee Selection Committee
/s/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"N" AGENDA ITEM #11(i )(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "N"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-77
APPRCVIN3 ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH BA099N AND CALL E L CUNSULTIISG ENGINEERS
RE DESIGN OF JOB MD. J-19
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR
DESIGN OF CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS,
JOB NO. J-19
4IIERSAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 21
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy
establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and
architectural services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with
Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for design of Central Pacer Generation
Systems, Job No. J-19; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on
April 9, 1986, the Selection Counittee, established pursuant to said procedures,
has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed Engineering Services Agreenent is for a
project which is a portion of the previously-approved Joint Treatment Works
Wastewater Master Plan. The project is to be designed as per the Master Plan
approval. In accordance with the California Ehvironnantal Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, and Section 15069 of the Districts' Guidelines, a Final
Environnpntal Impact Report covering this project was approved by the Districts'
r�
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(j ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-1"
Boards of Directors on July 10, 1985; and,
Section 2. That the certain Engineering Services Agreement dated July 9,
1986, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County and Braun and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, for design
of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 3. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in
accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows:
Engineering Services, including
labor and overhead at 185%,
not to exceed $217,385.00
Out-of-Pocket Expenses, at cost,
not to exceed 3,500.00
Fixed Profit 32,073.00
TOTAL,. not to exceed $252,958.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"0-2" AGENDA ITEM #11( j ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2'
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
8�
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
t P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962.2411
I�
June 18, 1986 __- -�-
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering
Services Agreement for the Design of Electrical Reliability
Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-22, and Electrical Reliability
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2
In accordance with the Districts ' procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the fallowing
addendum with John Carollo Engineers for the design of Electrical Reliability
Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-22, and Electrical Reliability
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2 to provide for added design work
`..d associated with a new duct system for power and telephone services to serve
the Administration Building Addition as well as construction support services,
on an hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead, plus profit, for an
amount not to exceed $26,010.
Engineering Services, including
labor and overhead at 139%,
not to exceed $22,620
Fixed Profit 3 390
Total , not to exceed 'S9'OT6
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in
excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/Don R. Griffin /s/Don E. Smith
an r n, o nt a rman on mTice o nt naTrman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"P" AGENDA ITEM #11(k)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "P"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-78
APPRO'JING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT WITH
JOHN CAROL.IO ENGINEERS RE JOBS NOS. P1-22
AND J-6-2
A JOINT RESOIUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE ODUNfY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT WITH JOHN
CAROLIO ENGINEERS RE DESIGN OF E[d•=CAL MJABIIITY
FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-22, AND
ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2,
JOB NO. J-6-2, PROVIDING. FOR DESIGN OF EXTENSION
OF Em.rr=CAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
YOOTAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with John
Carollo Engineers for design of Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-22, and Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-6-2; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 provided for design changes necessitated by
implementation of new odor control measures which included covering primary
sedimentation basins and installation of an extensive new scrubber system, as well
as installation of central power generation facilities which affected the
previously-planned power distribution and use schemes considered by John Carollo
Engineers; and,
REMMAc, it is now deemed appropriate to father amend said agreement to
provide for design of an extension of the "backbone" electrical distribution
system to serve the proposed administration building addition and other support
facilities at Plant No. 1; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on May 14,
1986, the Selection Camhittee has negotiated and certified a fee for said
services, in accordance with established procedures.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "Q-1"
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DEPER4M AMID ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated July 9, 1986, to that certain
agreement dated November 14, 1989, by and between County Sanitation District No.
1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and John Carollo Engineers, re design of
Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-22, and Electrical
Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2, providing for design of an
extension of the "backbone" electrical distribution system to serve the proposed
administration building addition and other support facilities at Plant No. 1, is
hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount
not to exceed $26,010.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized
compensation from $502,330.00 to $528,340.00:
Engineering Services, including
labor and overhead at 139% $22,620.00
Fixed Profit 3,390.00
TOTAL, not to exceed $26,010.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AMID ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(k)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "Q-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 1 /
y 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 2270&7018
(714) $62.2411
June 18, 1986
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 2 to Engineering
Services Agreement in Connection with Ocean Outfall Booster Station
"C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15 with John Carollo Engineers
In accordance with the Districts ' procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following
addendum with John Carollo Engineers for the design of the Ocean Outfall
Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15 to provide for increase in
subconsultant fees as well as providing construction services associated with
Job No. J-15A, Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive
Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, on an
hourly-rate basis, including labor and overhead, plus direct expenses and sub-
consultant services and profit, in an amount not to exceed $102,156.00.
Direct labor and overhead at 143%,
not to exceed $ 69,056
Direct Expenses, at cost, not to
exceed 5,000
Subconsultant Services, at cost, not
to exceed 17,000
Fixed Fee 11 100
Total , not to exceed $102 i56
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in
excessive profits for the consultant.
/ 'in R�i Grfino�ntC Iai rman /tos/DF—Sm iSmitP ce Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Thomas M. Dawes
omas awes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"R" AGENDA ITEM #11(L)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "R"
RESOLUTION No. 86-79
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT WITH JOHN
CAROLLD ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF JOB NO. J-15
�,.✓ A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT WITH
JOHN CAROLID ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF OCEAN
OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2,
JOB NO. J-15
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with John
Carollo Engineers for preliminary design (Phase I) of Ocean Outfall Booster
Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for additional services re
final design (Phase II) of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with John
Carollo Engineers to provide for additional services relative to soils surveying and
mapping and for engineering services required for shop drawing review and factory
testing of the major equipment to be prepurchased; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on May 14, 1986,
the Selection Camtittee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services, in
accordance with established procedures.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated July 9, 1986, to that certain agreement
dated May 11, 1983, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and
14, for preliminary design (Phase I) of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant
"S-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(L) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-1"
No. 2, Job No. J-15, providing for additional services relative to soils surveying
and mapping, and for engineering services for shop drawing review and factory testing
of the major equipment to be prepurchased, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not
to exceed $102,156.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation
from $1,971,094.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,073,250.00:
Direct Labor and Overhead
at 143%, not to exceed $ 69,056.00
Direct Expenses, at cost,
not to exceed 5,000.00
Subconsultants, at cost,
not to exceed 17,000.00
Profit 11,100.00
TOTAL, NOT TO E}R'® $102,156.00
Section 3. That the Chairmen and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"S-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(L) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
7/1/86 1090 EWSAVENUE
G.O.MX M7
EO M VN 1.GUfO1LlY 92]2&m1'�
�/ A1°I B823A11
STAFF REPORT
Financing Alternatives for Job No. J-15A
PREPURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE SYSTEMS AND PUMPS FOR
OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2
In April 1986, the Directors approved specifications for the prepurchase of
pumps, motors and variable frequency drive systems for the new Ocean Outfall
Booster Station "C" to be located at Treatment Plant No. 2. Three firms were
prequalified to submit proposals, General Electric, Westinghouse and Brown
Boveri . The bids, received on June 3, 1986, ranged from a low of $4,025,440
from GE to a high of $6,917,000 from Brown Boveri. GE also had the best effi-
ciency for the motor and pump combination, and was awarded a contract at the
regular June meeting.
At the request of the Fiscal Policy Committee, all suppliers were requested to
submit an alternative financing package. BE submitted a lease/purchase package
option wherein financing would be provided by First Continental Leasing
Corporation for either five-year or seven-year periods. At the June meeting the
Directors postponed action on the financing package pending analysis by staff
and engineers and awarded the contract with the provision that the optional
financing package could be either accepted or rejected at a later date.
Staff has reviewed the GE lease/purchase option and compared it to the tradi-
tional direct purchase alternative also provided for in the contract documents.
For purposes of illustration, a $4,000.000 financing package was assumed.
Detailed cost analysis was performed on both five-year and seven-year options.
The options offered by BE are as follows:
Term Interest Rate Monthly Payment
5 yr 7.74% $80,612.53
7 yr 7.94% $62,181.B4
Under the lease/purchase financing package, the first monthly payment would be
required August 15, 1986. Thereafter, equal monthly payments would be required
for either five or seven years as illustrated above.
The staff's analysis was made on the basis of establishing a sinking fund
account of $4,000,000 for either the lease/purchase or traditional direct
purchase. This is a realistic approach since the District does have the
necessary funds in reserves accumulating interest. Currently, the District is
receiving investment interest of just over 9% on monies deposited and co-mingled
with County Treasury funds. For this analysis, staff assumed that the District
would receive 9% over the five-year period.
"T-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(m)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-1"
Staff Report
7/1/86
Page Two
Under the GE 5-year proposal , funds would be withdrawn each month at the rate of
$80,612.53 to fund the lease/purchase with remaining funds accumulating interest
at the assumed 9%. This resulted in a balance of $1,075,000 remaining in the
account at the end of the five-year period.
The contract documents also provided that the District could pay for the equip-
ment under a direct purchase method based on progress payments when certain
milestones were met. These milestones and the percentages of the bid amount
together with the payment, based on the $4,000,000 figure, follow:
Time (Mos.)
from Notice Percentage Payment based on
Task to Proceed* Received $4,000,000
A. Approval of Shop Drawings 3 7% $ 280,000
B. Pump Factory Tests and
Delivery of Pumps 18 13% 520,000
C. Factory Tests and Delivery
of Drive Systems 24 55% 2,200,000
D. Delivery of 0&M Manuals and
Spare Parts 30 5% 200,000
E. Complete Installation of Drive
Systems, not including Motors 30 10% 400,000
F. Final Acceptance of Total
Package 36 10% 400,000
100% $4,000,000
*Expected about July 15, 1986.
Staff has prepared what it considers to be a reasonable schedule for completion
of the items above. The delivery and/or completion of the work items is depen-
dent not only upon GE, but upon completion of booster station improvements under
a yet to be advertised contract. Included above in the "Time" column are the
assumptions made by staff.
The direct purchase analysis assumes that all work will be done in a three-year
period. As in the first case, $4,000,000 is assumed deposited in a fund which
will earn 9% interest co-mingled with other District and County funds. The
results of this analysis show that at the end of the three-year period, $848,000
is left in the account which will continue to grow with interest during the next
two years, similar to the lease/purchase account described above. At the end of
five years the account will have $1,014,D00.
Based on this analysis, on the surface the District would appear to benefit by
$61.000 at the end of the five-year period based on the lease/purchase option. V
"T-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(m)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-2"
Staff Report
7/1/86
Page Three
However, analysis was extended to assume the work was not completed until three
years and three months. Under this analysis the balance tipped in favor of
direct purchase over lease/purchase financing by $20,000. Completion within the
three-year period is dependent on finishing the design as well as the construc-
tion on a very tight schedule; experience has shown that unforeseen events often
cause delays. If the project goes later than assumed in this analysis, it is
advantageous to the District to pay by direct purchase.
A similar analysis was made for the 7-year option, and the direct purchase
option gave far greater benefit than the lease/purchase alternative.
Staff believes that it is quite probable that the design, construction and
delivery times will extend past three years. Additionally, discussions
regarding interest assumptions indicate that the 9% figure is an expected low,
and that over the five-year period, higher yields may be expected. Accordingly,
staff recommends that the contract be awarded under the normal direct purchase
method, and that the lease/purchase option offered by GE not be accepted.
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
TMD:ja
"T-Y AGENDA ITEM #11(m)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-80
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR JOB NO. J-15B-2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR VAULTS FOR
ULTRASONIC FLOW METER FOR OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB
NO. J-15B-2
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
WHEREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and
specifications for Vaults for Ultrasonic Flow Meter for Ocean Outfall, Job
No. J-15B-2.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have
concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby
determine that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements;
and,
Section 2. That the project for construction of Vaults for Ultrasonic Flow
Meter for Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-15B-2, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary
be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this
day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' engineers for construction of
Vaults for Ultrasonic Flow Meters for Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-15B-2, are hereby
approved and adopted; and,
"U-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(n) - ALL DISTRICTS 11U-1"
Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids
for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of
California; and,
Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and
time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or
his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1966.
"U-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(n) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-2"
.... ...., ....... .. ii.i(Ia. L.J I u:� 1 P.O eo. D-i• 7502 earoeen Ave. • ilnm. Calif. 927I6-6015 d::,63142:?
June 17, 1986
0365Y6/86
FA 20301
Mr. Tam Dawes
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
SUBJECT: VON KARMAN TRUNK SEWER
Dear Mr. Dawes:
Based on your analysis of June 10, 1986, 1 concur that CSD #14 (IRWO) is
entitled to 3.5 MGD ownership in Reach 2 of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer. It
is my further understanding that ownership has been paid for in the
incremental cost previously paid by 1RWO. The prior payment of this
project of pro rata share of Reach I, in Main Street, should constitute CSO
#14 's full obligation in both reaches.
Thank you for your review in this matter.
Sincerely,
7 RANCH WATER DISTRICT
OZ
Ronald E. Youn
Director of Engineering and Planning
REY:lf
"V" AGENDA ITEM #11(o) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "V11
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
W ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
6/23/86 ,oem ears<vENUE
oo.eoxe127
FWWWNVa Y.neranm•n>x.e,a>
a,a.
STAFF REPORT n,<,om.zn,o
Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8
Irvine Ranch Water District Pro Rata Share of Capacity
in Von Karman Avenue between Michelson Drive and Main Street
In the original agreement between Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) and
County Sanitation District No. 7 (OCSD), it was agreed that IRWD would pay the
difference between Schedule A (which would serve both IRWD and OCSD) and
Schedule B (which would serve only OCSD). Subsequently, IRWD elected to
change the delivery point from Michelson Drive at Von Karman Avenue to Main
Street at the San Diego Creek, and no longer requires capacity in the sewer
between Michelson Drive and Main Street. IRWD has already paid $867,696 for
the upsizing of the Von Karman Sewer, and would be required to pay additional
funds for the full design capacity right of 5,8 million gallons per day be-
tween Michelson Drive and Main Street.
This report attempts to determine what capacity the upsizing funds already
paid would equal between Michelson Drive and Main Street. It is not a direct
calculation since there was an unbalancing of the bids between the two schedu-
les. Reach 3, southerly of Michelson Drive, was constructed solely for CSD
`..� No. 7, and as such, should have cost the same under either schedule since
there was no difference in pipe sizes or depths. However, this reach cost
less under Schedule A than Schedule B. For this analysis, it has been assumed
that the incremental cost between Schedule A and Schedule B (the $867,696) be
distributed to only the reaches in which IRWD originally proposed ownership,
and that Reach 3 remain the same, as follows:
Reach Schedule A Schedule B Difference
In Main Street $2,613,009 $1,931,513 $ 681,496
Von Karman, Main Street to
Michelson Drive 1,598,689 1,213,608 385,081
Subtotal T4_,2T W
Von Karman, south of Michelson
Drive (CSD 97 only) 1,113,3002 1,312,183 967:991
Portion of Incremental Cost prorated to Reach 2:
$05 X $867,696 = $329,363
"W-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(o) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-1"
Staff Report
June 23, 1986
Page Two
Utilizing this method, it appears that about 38% of the incremental dif-
ference, or $329,363, would be allocated to the reach between Main Street and
Michelson Drive. This would then represent IRWD's payment for capacity in
that reach.
The total cost of the contract as of April 19, 1986 was $5,910,271.00. Based
on the original prices for the work, it appears that reach between Michelson
Drive and Main Street would cost 30.02% of the project cost; however, there
were change orders which were specific to certain reaches, accounted separa-
tely as follows:
Total Cost of Contract (includes change
orders, design, inspection and
survey charges) $5,910,271.00
Final Contract Amount (includes change
orders) 5,438,090.00
Cost of Design, Construction, Inspection, --
Surveys, etc. $ 471,181.00
Cost of Reach 2, Michelson Drive to Main Street �✓
Bid Price plus final Adjustment of
Engineer's Quantities: $5,323,952 x .3002 = $1,598,250.00
Direct cost of change. order items
per Change Order No. 1: 16,876.00
Pro Rata cost of Design, Construction
and Survey: $471,181.00 x .3002 141,489.00
Total Cost of Reach 2: $1,756,575.00
Between Michelson Drive and Main Street, the sewer was constructed utilizing
48-inch and 42-inch pipe. The capacity of the 48-inch is 18.5 mgd and governs
the capacity of the reach because of the slope. Based on the above figures,
the capacity applicable to the IRWD payment of $329,363 follows:
329,363 x 18.5 mgd = 3.47 mgd
1,7 ,
Accordingly, staff recommends that based on funds already paid for the Von
Karman Trunk Sewer between Michelson Drive and Main Street, IRWD be allocated
a capacity of 3.5 million gallons per day in that reach and that no further
Payment be due.
"W-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(o)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-92
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH
DISTRICT NO. 14 FOR PURCHASE OF CAPACITY
RIGHTS IN TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND SEWER
FACILITIES
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND
14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF CAPACITY RIGHTS IN
TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND SEWER FACILITIES
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California and County Sanitation District
No. 14 of Orange County, California, have heretofore entered into an Agreement for
Purchase and Sale of Capacity Rights in Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities,
effective January 1, 1986; and,
WHEREAS, said Agreement provides, in part, for District No. 14 to acquire
V►� certain capacity rights in the Von Kerman Trunk Sewer upon payment of both an
incremental cost for added capacity and a pro rats cost for the proportional share
between the added capacity and the total capacity of said line; and,
WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend said Agreement by establishing a new share
of ownership in said trunk sewer and to re-establish the appropriate cost sharing
obligations between the Districts.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, and County Sanitation
District No. 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That certain Amendment No. 1, dated , to the
"X-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(o)(3) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-1"
Agreement by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, it and
13 of Orange County, California and County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange
County, California, dated January 1, 1986, relating to the purchase and sale of
capacity rights in the treatment, disposal and sewer facilities is hereby approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"X-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(o) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-2"
NO SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
"Y" AGENDA ITEM #11(t) - ALL DISTRICTS "Y"
NO SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
"Z" AGENDA ITEM #11(w) - DISTRICT 1 "Z"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-93-2
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
(ANNEXATION NO. 53 - BORROW PIT ANNEXATION)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION No. 53 - BORROW PIT
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2)
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation
District No. 2 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition
filed by the property owner; and,
Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965)
of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has
heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said
..✓
territory to County Sanitation District No. 2 by The Goeden Company, Santiago Plaza
Associates, Lusk Nohl Company and Gerald Lutzky, former owners of said property to
be annexed, by means of Resolution No. 82-128-2, filed with said Commission by the
District; and,
Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 53 - Borrow Pit Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 2", the exterior boundaries of which are described on
Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of
this resolution; and,
Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and,
Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and
"AA-I" AGENDA ITEM #11(y) - DISTRICT 2 "AA-1"
provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,
Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation acreage fees in the
amount of $117,493.90 has been satisfied; and,
Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h)(1) of
the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation
exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and
Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation
Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6
of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and
described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation
District No. 2 without notice or hearing and without election.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"AA-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(y) - DISTRICT 2 "AA-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-94-6
DIRECTING„ COUNTY AUDITOR-CDNTROLLER 70
COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 1986-87
gar/ PROPERTY TAX BILLS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEKER SERVICE
CHARGES ON THE 1986-87 PROPERTY TAX BILLS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 has
heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Changes;
and,
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such
charges, as adopted by District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax
roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together
with and not separate from, its general taxes.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
4.✓ No. 6 of Orange County, California.
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473,
the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer
service charges as established by Ordinance No. 609 on the 1986-87 property tax
bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together
with and not separate from, the general taxes and the property tax bills for each
year thereafter for so long as the rates do not increase and this resolution
remains in effect; and,
Section 2. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473,
this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed or
"BB-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(aa) - DISTRICT 6 "BB-1"
until such time as the rate of sewer charges as established by Ordinance No. 609
is increased; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and
directed to execute any necessary d ocuments or agreements to effect the order set
forth in Section 1 herein.
PASS® AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"BB-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(aa) - DISTRICT 6 "BB-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
�1 P.O.BOX$127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 927284127
10044 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7010
(714)962-2411
�'�--^---- June 25, 1986 ..—._ .
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 7
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 4 to Engineering
Services Agreement in connection with Main Street Pump Station,
Contract No. 7-7
In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engi-
neering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following Addendum
No. 4 for the design of Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7, for project
inspection services due to District's staff shortages, on an hourly-rate basis
including labor, overhead and profit for a total amount not to exceed $45,000.
Engineering Services, including
labor, overhead and profit,
not to exceed $45.000
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in
excessive profits for the consultant.
Richard Ed ar !Ral— lv Anne Miller
c and dgar, hairman Sally Anne 7l�er, hairman pro tem
Selection Committee Selection Committee
District No. 7 District No. 7
/s/Thomas M_Da
so0a Dawes, U7 rector 0f 7neer ng
Selection Committee
"CC,, AGENDA ITEM #11(bb) - DISTRICT 7 "W,
RESOLJTION NO. 86-96-7
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 9 TO AGREEMENT WITH
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR DESIGN OF
THE MAIN STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT
NO. 7-7
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 9
TO AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINFERIN3 CORPORATION
RE DESIGN OF THE MAIN STREET PUMP STATION,
CONTRACT NO. 7-7, PROVIDING FOR PROTECT
INSPECTION SERVICES
WHMEAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California, has heretofore entered into an agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation for design of Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement authorized additional engineering
services to provide for IRWD/District No. 19 capacity in said facilities and
provided that said additional design services were to be reimbursed by IRWD; and,
WHERFRF.AS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for additional engineering
�.�✓
services, including surveying services, during construction of said project; and,
WHEREM, Addendum No. 3 provided for additional engineering inspection and
surveying services; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with
Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide for project inspection services due to
Districts' staff shortages; and,
tHERFAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on June ll, 1986,
the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services, in
accordance with established procedures.
NOW, THEPOFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DE7EP r NE AMID ORDER:
"DD-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(bb) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "DD-1
Section 1. That Addend= No. 4 dated July 9, 1986, to that certain
Engineering Services Agreement dated April 13, 1983, by and between County
Sanitation District No. 7 and Hoyle Engineering Corporation re design of the Main
Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7. providing for project inspection services due
to Districts' staff shortages, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased for said
additional work on an hourly-rate basis, including overhead and profit, by an amount
not to exceed $45,000.00, which increases the total maximum compensation from
$308,423.00 to an amount not to exceed $353,423.00; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 7 are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 4 in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular nesting held July 9, 1986.
"DD-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(bb) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "DD-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
/1\
P.O.BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92129-9127
10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962-2411
I !
I
ji
June 17, 1986
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 11
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection
with the Preparation of a Project Report on the Ocean Avenue Trunk
Sewer
In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engi-
neering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with
Boyle Engineering Corporation for the Preparation of a Project Report on the
Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer, on an hourly-rate basis including overhead, plus fixed
profit and out-of-pocket expenses, in an amount not to exceed $9,715.
Engineering Services, on an
hourly-rate basis plus overhead
at 156%, not to exceed $8,100
Out-of-Pocket Expenses, direct cost,
not to exceed 400
Fixed Profit 1 215
Total , not to exceed $4`YiS
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in
excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/Ruth Bailey /s/Thomas M. Dawes
Ruth Bailey, Chairman Thomas M. Fawes
Selection Committee Selection Committee
District No. 11 Director of Engineering
"EE" AGENDA ITEM #11(dd)(1) - DISTRICT 11 "EE"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-97-11
APPROVING ENGINEERIN', SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR
fir.✓ PREPARATION OF A PROTECT REPORT ON THE
OCEAN AVENUE TRUNK SEWER
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRIX.•lURS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALI U NIA, APPROVING ENGINEERING
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING
CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF A PROJECT
REPORT ON THE OCEAN AVENUE TRUNK SEWER
WiHERFEAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy
establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and
architectural services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agrement has been negotiated
with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of a Project Report on the
Ocean Avenue Trunk Sever; and,
.� WHEREAS, the Selection Camdttee, established pursuant to said procedures,
has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Engineering Services Agreement dated July 9,
1986, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and Boyle Engineering
Corporation, for preparation of a Project Report on the Ocean Avenue Trunk
Sewer, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in
accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows:
"FF-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(dd) (2) - DISTRICT 11 "FF-1"
Engineering Services,
on an holy-rate basis,
plus overhead at 156%,
not to exceed $8,100.00
Out-of-Pocket Expenses,
direct cost, not to exceed 400.00
Fixed Profit 1,215.00
TOTAL, not to exceed $9,715.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"FF-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(dd) (2) - DISTRICT 11 "FF-2"
RESOIITTTON NO. 86-75
APPROVING A14MUM T NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT WITH SAIC
FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR CSDOC
120-II3CH OCEAN OUTFALL, SPECIFICATION NO. S-032
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE HOARDS OF DIRECTMS OF
COUNTS[ SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT WITH SCIENCE
APPLICATIONS IIiTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (SAIC) FOR
OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 120-INCH
OCEAN Q)TFALL, SPECIFICATION NO. S-032, E)UMING
EXISTING CONTRACT FOR ONE YEAR
x x x x x x x x x x x + r x x x +
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Science
Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services
for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall,
Specification No. S-032; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 provided for the acquisition of additional laboratory
instrumentation and authorized additional laboratory work to perform analyses on
ocean sediments for trace constituents to comply with additional requirements
imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency; and,
. EREAS, Amendment No. 2 provided for modifications to the Current Monitoring
Program required by EPA; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement to extend
said existing contract from July 1, 1986 to June 30, 1987; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the established procedures for selection of
professional engineering and architectural services, the Selection Committee has
negotiated and certified a fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HERESY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
"GG-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "GG-1"
Section 1. That A eedment No. 3 dated July 1, 1986, to that certain agreement
dated August 7, 1985, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and �.,✓
14, for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, providing for an extension
of the existing contract from July 1, 1986 through June 30, 1987 (Contract Period
No. 2), is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by $1,530,486.00
for the second year of said contract, increasing the total authorized conTensaticn
from $1,002,705.00 to $2,533,191.00; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Amendment No. 3 in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular nesting held July 9, 1986.
"GG-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "GG-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-84
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE FORM OF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY OF AN ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
FOR JOINT FACILITIES, AN ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT, A TRUST
AGREEMENT AND A NOTICE INVITING BIDS; APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN OFFICIAL
STATEMENT; APPROVING THE SALE OF CERTIFICATES OF
PARTICIPATION BY A TRUSTEE IN PAYMENTS MADE BY THE
DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SAID ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION
AGREEMENT FOR JOINT FACILITIES; AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN
OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
WHEREAS, this County Sanitation District proposes to acquire and/or construct
certain improvements to joint facilities currently owned by it and the other County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, as more particularly described in
the Acquisition and Construction Agreement described below (the "Project"); and,
WHEREAS, certain of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California propose to finance such acquisition and/or construction or acquire the
Project through the execution of an Agreement for the Acquisition and Construction
of Joint Facilities, dated as of August 1, 1986, by and among this District and
those other Districts participating in such financing (together with this District,
the "Participating Districts"), a form of which has been provided to this meeting
(the "Acquisition and Construction Agreement"); and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to an Assignment Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1986, by
and among the Participating Districts and a bank or trust company, as trustee (the
"Trustee"), each of the Participating Districts will assign to the Trustee their
several rights to payments due under and pursuant to the Acquisition and
Construction Agreement, a form of which has been provided to this meeting; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to a Trust Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1986, by and
among the Trustee and the Participating Districts, a form of which has been provided
to this meeting (the "Trust Agreement"), certificates of participation evidencing
11HH-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(d) (3) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3.5.6&14 "HH-1"
direct and proportionate interests in payments due under and pursuant to the
Acquisition and Construction Agreement will be delivered (the "Certificates of
Participation"); and,
WHEREAS, the Participating Districts will issue a Notice Inviting Bids, dated
, 1986, as a notice of sale for the bid and purchase of the
Certificates of Participation, a form of which has been provided to this meeting
(the "Notice Inviting Bids"); and,
WHEREAS, in connection with such sale there has been provided to this meeting
a draft preliminary Official Statement, dated 1986, relating to the
Certificates of Participation (the "Official Statement"), and,
WHEREAS, after having reviewed and considered the recommendation of the
Financial Advisor to this District and the agreements and other documents referred
to above, this District desires to authorize the execution of such documents and
performance of such acts as may be necessary or desirable by it in connection with
the issuance and sale of the Certificates of Participation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of this District as
follows:
Section 1. The Acquisition and Construction Agreement, in substantially the
form provided to this meeting, be and the same is hereby, approved. The Chairman or
Chairman pro tempore of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute
and deliver the Acquisition and Construction Agreement with such changes, insertions
and omissions as may be approved by the officer executing the same, said execution
being conclusive evidence of such approval; and the Secretary or an Assistant
Secretary is hereby authorized to attest and affix the seal of the District thereto.
Section 2. The Assignment Agreement, in substantially the form provided to
_ this meeting, be and the same is hereby, approved. The Chairman or Chairman pro
tempore of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the
"HH-2" AGENDA ITEM #15(d) (3) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,&14 "HH-2"
Assignment Agreement with such changes, insertions and omissions as may be approved
by the officer executing the same, said execution being conclusive evidence of such
approval; and the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary is hereby authorized to attest
and affix the seal of the District thereto.
Section 3. The Trust Agreement, in substantially the form provided to this
meeting, be and the same is hereby, approved. The Chairman or Chairman pro tempore
of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Trust
Agreement with such changes, insertions and omissions as may be approved by the
officer executing the same, said execution being conclusive evidence of such
approval; and the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary is hereby authorized to attest
and affix the seal of the District thereto.
Section 4. The Notice Inviting Bids, in substantially the form provided to
this meeting, be and the same is hereby, approved. The Chairman or Chairman pro
tempore of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the
Notice Inviting Bids with such changes, insertions and omissions as may be approved
by the officer executing the same, said execution being conclusive evidence of such
approval and to award the sale of this District's share of Certificates of
Participation to the lowest bidder therefor; provided, however, that the rate of
interest represented by the Certificates of Participation shall not exceed _X per
annum, the purchase price of the Certificates of Participation shall not be leas
than % of the aggregate principal amount thereof, and the aggregate principal
amount thereof shall not exceed $175,000,000.00.
Section S. The issuance and delivery of the Certificates of Participation on
the terms and conditions specified in the Acquisition and Construction Agreement and
the Trust Agreement are hereby approved.
Section 6. The preliminary Official Statement in substantially the form
provided to this meeting, be and the same is hereby, approved. The preliminary
11HH-3" AGENDA ITEM #15(d) (3) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6&14 "HH-3"
Official Statement is approved for distribution in the offering and sale of the
Certificates of Participation. The Chairman or Chairman pro tempore is hereby
authorized and directed to execute the preliminary Official Statement when revised
into the form of a Final Official Statement and to execute said Final Official
Statement, dated as of the date of the sale of the Certificates of Participation in
the name of and on behalf of the District, and thereupon to cause the Final Official
Statement to be delivered to the immediate purchaser with such approval to be
conslusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof.
Section 7. The Chairman, Chairman pro tempore, Secretary, and any other
proper officer, official or member of the staff of the District, acting singly, be
and each of them hereby is authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and
all documents and instruments and to do and cause to be done any and all acts and
things necessary or proper for carrying out the transactions contemplated by the
Trust Agreement, the Acquisition and Construction Agreement, Assignment Agreement,
the Notice Inviting Bids, the Official Statement and this resolution.
Section 8. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"HH-4" AGENDA #15(d) (3) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6&14 "HH-4"
RESOLUTION NO. 86-85-1
ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 FOR Ti'M DISTRICT IN
ACOORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9
OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA CAVEPM1ENT CODE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LD= FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE
CALIFORNIA GOVE MENT CODE
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
WdEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as
proposed by the Initiative Measure approved by the people at the special
statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual
appropriations subject to limitation of each local government shall not exceed
the appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year adjusted for changes
in the cost of living and population except as otherwise specifically provided
for in said Article; and,
W11ERFAS, the State Legislature added Division 9 (commencing with Section
7900) to Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California to implement
Article XIII B of the California Constitution; and,
WF)ERFAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the
governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its
appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at
a regularly-scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting and that fifteen (15)
days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the determination of the
appropriations limit shall be available to the public; and,
WHEREAS, Section 7902 (a) of the Government Code sets forth the method for
determining the appropriations limit for each local jurisdiction for the 1986-87
"II-1" AGENDA ITEM #17 - ALL DISTRICTS
fiscal year; and,
WHEREAS, THE Board of Directors wish to establish the appropriations limit
for fiscal year 1986-87 for the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That it is hereby found and determined that the documentation
used in the determination of the appropriations limit for County Sanitation
District No. 1 of Orange County, California, for fiscal year 1986-87, was
available to the public in the Finance Department of said District at least
fifteen (15) days prior to this date.
Section 2: That the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1986-87 for County
Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, as established in
accordance with Section 7902(a) of the California Government Code is
$1,822,590.00 which sum is within the maximum authorized spending limitation for
fiscal year 1986-87.
Section 3: The determination of the appropriation limit is based upon the
best and most complete information available at this time. The District reserves
the right to review and re-establish a new and different limit in the event that
it subsequently determines that a modification of the limitation amount is
appropriate.
PASSED AMID ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1986.
"II-2" AGENDA ITEM #17 - ALL DISTRICTS "II-2"
ORDINANCE NO. 720
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 718
ESTABLISHING SEPARATE ZONES WITHIN THE DISTRICT
AND ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR
ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS AND
REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 719
WHEREAS, the use of District sewage facilities are generally
regulated by the provisions of Ordinance No. 718; and
WHEREAS, the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer
Facilities, adopted in December, 1982, identified the required
trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities to serve the District, based
on the projected land use planning at that time; and
WHEREAS, in recent years, great amounts of commercial, of-
fice and industrial development have occurred within the Dis-
trict, yielding significantly greater densities for individual
parcels than the average for that area, as identified in the
Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities; and
WHEREAS, the District's Deputy Chief Engineer previously
prepared a report establishing that existing trunk and subtrunk
sewer facilities in certain areas of the District were operating
at maximum capacity and require additional capacity to accom-
modate planned development within the District; and
WHEREAS, the District determined that plans had been formu-
lated and considered in the area designated as the Irvine Busi-
ness Complex Area which would add approximately 17,557,000 square
feet of commercial, office and industrial space to the area; and
"JJ-1" AGENDA ITEM #30 - DISTRICT 7
WHEREAS, the District completed a study of necessar_
facilities in the Irvine Business Complex Area, in order -o
. provide sewer service to the lands to be developed in the fuz' re;
and
WHEREAS, the District determined that the sewer service
needs throughout the District vary considerably; and
WHEREAS, the District adopted a schedule of fees to be paid
for connecting to the District's facilities, which fees are to be
used by the District to pay for the cost of construction of trunk
and subtrunk sewer facilities; and
WHEREAS, the District determined that the cost of construc-
tion of additional necessary trunk and subtrunk sewer facilities
would be unable to be met if the present connection fee
schedules, used to finance such projects, remain unchanged; and
WHEREAS, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 719, District
established separate zones within the District and established a
schedule of fees for issuance of sewer connection permits; and
WHEREAS, since the adoption of Ordinance No. 719, creating
separate zones within the District, significant land use changes
have occurred in the southern portion of District No. 7 in the
area adjacent to the Irvine Business Comolex and the San Diego
and Newport Freeway corridors, with the anticipated develocment
of great amounts of commercial, office and industrial space which
will generate more wastewater than was originally anticipated in
the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities and
requiring the construction of additional relief facilities not
2
%J-2" AGENDA ITEM #36 - DISTRICT 7 "JJ-2"
identified in said Master Plan: and
WHEREAS, in order to provide equity between new development
and territory currently located in Zone 2 of District, the Dis-
trict has determined that Zone 2 within District should be ex-
panded to include anticipated commercial development but ex-
cluding residential areas, so that connection fees ,in the ex-
panded portion of Zone 2 will be consistent with the remainder of
Zone 2.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN
as follows:
Section 1: Section No. 702 of Ordinance No. 718 is hereby
amended to read:
"702. DISTRICT NO. 7 CONNECTION CHARGES
�..✓ A. The District is divided into two (2 )
separate zones for purposes of development and
regulation of sewage facility use. Said zones
are established as follows:
Zone 1: All that territory within the
District, exclusive of that ter-
ritory within Zone 2;
Zone 2: All that territory described as
the Irvine Business Complex Area,
and the territory adjacent to the
Irvine Business Complex and San
3
"JJ-3" AGENDA ITEM #36 - DISTRICT 7 "JJ-3"
Diego and Newport Freeway corr_-
dors.
The precise boundaries of each of the above
Zones are set forth and shown on Exhibit 'A'
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
B. District Connection Charges.
Before any connection permit shall be is-
sued, the applicant shall pay to the District,
or its agent, the charges specified herein:
1 . Connection charge for new construc-
tion, dwelling buildings:
For each new dwelling unit
constructed, the connection charge
shall be $250.00 per dwelling unit.
2. Connection charge for existing dwel-
ling buildings:
For the connection of each existing
dwelling building, the connection
charge shall be $250.00 per dwelling
unit.
3. Connection charge for new construction
and existing structures, other than
dwelling buildings:
For all other new construction, in-
cluding but not limited to commercial
4
"JJ-4" AGENDA ITEM #36 - DISTRICT 7 "JJ-4"
and industrial buildings, hotels and
motels, and public buildings, the
connection charge shall be:
Zone 1: S50.00 per 1,000 square feet
of floor area contained
within such construction,
provided that the minimum
connection charge for such
new construction shall be
S250.00;
Zone 2: $180.00 per 1 , 000 square
feet of floor area contained
within such construction,
provided that the minimum
`....� connection charge for such
new construction shall be
$250.00.
4. Connection charge for replacement
buildings:
For new construction replacing former
buildings, the connection charge shall
be calculated on the same basis as
provided in Paragraphs 1 and 3 above.
If such replacement construction is
commenced within two years after demo-
5
"JJ-5" AGENDA ITEM #35 - DISTRICT 7 "JJ-5"
lition or destruction of the former
building, a credit against such charge
shall be allowed and shall be the
equivalent connection charge for the
building being demolished or de-
stroyed, calculated on the basis of
current charges for new construction.
In no case shall such credit exceed
the connection charge.
5. Connection charges for additions or
alteration of existing buildings:
In the case of structures where fur-
ther new construction or alteration is
made to increase the occupancy of
dwelling buildings or the area of
buildings to be used for other than
dwelling buildings, the connection
charge shall be:
Zone 1: $250.00 for each dwelling
unit added or created, and,
in the case of new construc-
tion other than dwelling
buildings , it shall be
$50.00 per 1,000 square feet
of additional floor area
contained within such new
6
"JJ-6" AGENDA ITEM #36 - DISTRICT 7 "JJ-6"
construction, provided such
new construction shall con-
tain additional plumbing
fixture units;
Zone 2: $250.00 for each dwelling
unit added or created, and,
in the case of new construc-
tion other than dwelling
buildings, it shall be
$180.00 per 1, 000 square
feet of additional floor
area contained within such
new construction, provided
such new construction shall
contain additional plumbing
fixture units.
6. Trunk connection charge, residential
uses:
Family dwelling unit: S6.00 per front
foot for the real property fronting on
and connecting to a trunk sewer, pro-
vided that no such charge shall be
less than $400.00 plus the applicable
regular connection charge for dwelling
units hereinabove specified.
7
"JJ-7" AGENDA ITEM #36 - DISTRICT 7 "JJ-7"
7. Connection charge, off-site sewers not
a part of Master Plan relative to
reimbursement agreements:
The charges for connections to off-
site sewers which are not included as
a part of the District Master Plan and
for which a Non-Master Plan Reimburse-
ment Agreement has been entered into
between the District and the property
owner shall be in the amount provided
for in said Agreement. The amount set
forth in said Agreement shall be the
amount due whether the original Agree-
ment is still in force, has been ex-
tended, or has expired. These connec-
tion charges shall be in addition to
any other charges hereinabove estab-
lished for the property connecting to
said facilities.
8. Trunk connection charge, commercial or
industrial establishments:
$10.00 per front foot for the real
property fronting on and connecting to
a trunk sewer, provided that no such
front foot charge shall be less than
S500.00, plus the applicable regular
8
"JJ-8" AGENDA ITEM #36 - DISTRICT 7
connection charge for new construction
�..d and existing structures other than
dwelling buildings hereinabove speci-
fied.
9. Assessment District connection charge:
The regular connection charges pro-
vided in the preceding subsections of
this Article, plus a sum of money
equal to the assessment charge without
interest, or Treasurer's charge which
would have been made against the real
property on which said improvements
are located had said real property
been assessed within the Assessment
District which constructed or acquired
the Assessment District sewer to which
connection is made."
Section 2: Ordinance No. 719 is hereby repealed.
Section 3: If any provision or Section of this Ordinance is
declared to be unlawful, invalid, or in any manner unenforceable,
then each and every other provision herein shall remain in force
as though enecteC independently.
The Secretary of the Board is directed to certify to the
adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published in a
newspaper of general circulation within the County.
9
"ji-91" AGENDA ITEM #36 - DISTRICT 7 "ji-91"
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular- meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California, held June _, 1986. '
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California
Secretary of the Board of Directors,
County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California
(46 )
10
"JJ-10" AGENDA ITEM #36 - DISTRICT 7 "JJ-10"
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 72 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
JUNE 11, 1986
JTATZo*G
\�`/ Z� �•`�yollva O` nldT9i
U e �
GE co
a � T*,��� ��p�
1 DIII ,JJTRAII Y L' OFFICES
10844 E13 AVENUE
FOIINTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District. Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on June ll,.1986; at 7:30 -p.m., in
the Districts' Adminiecracive Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the
roll was called and the Secretary reported a quormn present for Districts Noe. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 as Eollowa:
�P7 ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman _Donald J. Saltarelli
--x-Robert Benson, Chairman pro tam Otma Crank
x_-Dan Driest Robert Luxembourger
-7-Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder
DISTRICT NO. 2: _Buck Catlin, Chairman x Chris Herby
x Richard Buck, Chairman pro tam _George Ziegler
-7--Dan Driver Robert Luxembourger
-a-Carol Reven®i _Mayne Silzel
William D. Mahoney x Dorothy Model
x J. Todd Murphy _Hdcheel J. Beverage
x James Neal _George Scott
x Bob Perry Norman Culver
a Don Roth _E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr.
x--Don Smith Gene Beyer
a Stanton —RogerHarriett Rieder
--x-John B. Sutton _Currey Nolan.
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Partin, Chairman _Otto J. Lacayo
x Richard Polls, Chairman pro tem _Keith Nelson
x Ruth Bailey Ruth Finley
Buck Catlia a Chris Horsy
x Ptank Clift _Joyce Risher -
x Norman Culver _Bob Perry
a Don Griffin _Lester Reese
!-Dan Orient Robert Luxembourger
_William D. Mahoney a Dorothy Model
x James Real _George Scott
x Carrey Nelson, _John R. Sutton
-
a Don Roth, B. Llewellyn Overholt
-!.--Sal Sepia. Mike Pace
-Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder
Charles Sylvia _Anthony Selvaggi
DISTRICT NO. 5: i Svelyn Hart, Chairman _John Cox, Jr.
x Philip Maurer, Chairman pro rem Job. Co., Jr.
a Roger Stanton _Barrie[[ Rieder
DISTRICT NO. 6: x Jame. Ratner, Chairman _James Gallacher
a Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tam John Cox, Jr.
a Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder
DISTRICT 90. 7: xRichard Edgar, Chairman _Donald J. Saltarelli
z Sally Anne Miller, Chairman pro tam _Dave Baker
x Dan Grieet Robert Luxembourger
x Philip Maurer Sohn Cox, Jr.
a Don Smith _Game Beyer
-';-Roger Stanton Harriett Winder
a Jame. Behest _Barry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Ruth Bailey, Chairman _Ruth Finley
_A_Roger Stanton, Chairman pro tam Harriet[ Wieder
a Job. Thomas _Ruth Finley
DISTRICT NO. 13: x John R. Sutton, Chairman _Carrey Nelson
x Michael J. Beverage, Chairman pro tam J. Todd Murphy
-7--Don Roth B. Llewellyn Overholt _
x Don Smith Gene Beyer
a Sogec Stanton _Harriet Wieder
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Sally Anne Hiller, Chairman _Dave Baker
x Peer A. Swan, Chairman pro tam _Darryl Hiller
a Drsula Kennedy _Donald J. Saltarelli
x Thomas F. Riley Harriett Wieder _
�J a Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder
_2_
06/11/86
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita
Brown, Board Secretary, William N. Clarke,
Thomas M. Dawes, Blake Anderson, Bill
Butler, Penny Kyle, Hilary Baker, Gary
Streed, Rich von Langen, Chuck Winsor,
Corinne Clawson, Bob Ooten, John Linder,
Dan Dillon, Judy Bucher
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Suzanne Atkins, Conrad Hohener, Walt
Howard, Ron Young, Director Joyce Risser,
Mardi Gilliland, Steve Dworkin, Lora
Stovall, Ed Long, Alan Watts
x + + x x x + x x x x x x
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excerpt
re Board Appointment That the minute excerpt from the City of
Seal Beach re election of mayor and
appointment of alternate Director and seating new member of the Board, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed as follows: (*Mayor)
Active Director Alternate Director
Frank Clift* Joyce Risner
DISTRICT I There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1986, or the adjourned
meetings held May 28, 1986 and June 4, 1986, the Chairman ordered that said
minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1986, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1986, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1986, or the adjourned meeting
held May 28, 1986, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as
mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1986, or the adjourned
meeting held May 21, 1986, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
-3-
06/11/86
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1986, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1986, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1986, the Chairmaa ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 14, 1986, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairmen Griffin reported that
Report of the Joint Chairman over the past year considerable interest
has been generated over ocean discharge
issues, particularly around Santa Monica Bay in Los Angeles. The City of Los
Angeles has gathered a group of interested parties, including federal and state
agencies, representatives from cities in and around Los Angeles, the Southern
California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP), the State University
Consortium, Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG), and POTW's in
the Southern California bight and our Districts' have also been asked to
participate. The City of Los Angeles has proposed that SCAG be utilized in a role
to coordinate efforts to address the Santa Monica Bay problems and to conduct
public forums.
The Joint Chairman then reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee would meet on
Wednesday, June 25th, at 4:00 p.m.
Chairman Griffin also called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday,
June 25th, at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Charles Sylvia and John Thomas to
attend and participate in the discussions.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized the
Presentation of plaques to following outgoing Chairmen for their
outgoing Chairmen efforts and dedication over the past
year(s) to Districts' activities. He
then presented plaques expressing the Boards' appreciation to Directors:
Bob Hanson, Chairman, District No. 1 (May 1982-May 1986)
Michael Beverage, Chairman District No. 13. (Nov 1985-May 1986)
Jim Wahner, Chairman, Fiscal Policy Committee (Jan 1985-May 1986)
Director Don R. Roth was absent from the meeting but will be receiving a plaque
as Chairman of District No. 2 from July 1984 to May 1986.
-4-
06/11/86
Chairman Griffin advised that Director Ron Hoesterey had been appointed the new
Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Committee to replace Jim Wahner who had stepped
down due to the press of other business.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented on a
Report of the General Manaxer report included in the Directors'
meeting folders prepared by Malcolm
Pirnie, the design engineer for the Districts' odor control program. The report
states that the Districts are designing the largest retrofit odor control project
in the nation.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages "A" and
"B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be,
and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
5/14/86 5/28/86
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - S 303,448.53 $ 630,423.68
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 196,921.79 2,010,432.11
Joint Working Capital Fund - 134,366.68 67,097.70
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 7,309.93 9,591.30
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 5.22 1,313.20
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 87,691.56 3,919.81
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 2,300.84 23,287.09
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 21,138.59 8,603.48
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 35.24
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 5,443.99 97,761.25
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 2,754.66 912.40
DISTRICT NO. 13 -0- -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 -0- -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 A 6 JOINT - 31,745.24 2,881.48
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 3,461.01 38.89
$ 796,623.28 $2 856,262.39
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plane and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
Job No. P1-21 specifications for Installation of
Replacement of Centrifuges with Belt
Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-21, authorizing an addition of $2,097.00
to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for changes to the scrubber
make-up water system and the caustic soda system, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plane and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
Job No. PI-24R specifications for Rehabilitation of
Basins 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, 'Job
No. P1-24R, authorizing an addition of $14,983.00 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. , for removal and replacement of a 12-inch drain line
interfering with excavation for new Power Building No. 4 being built under a
separate contract, be, and is hereby, approved.
-5-
06/11/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 7 to the
plane and specifications re That Change Order No. 7 to the plans and
Job No. P2-5R-2 specifications for Rehabilitation of
Primary Sedimentation Basins "F" and "G"
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2, authorizing an addition of $34,570.40 to the
contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. , for modifications to an existing
junction box, modifications to the bridge, scum boxes and handrailing to allow
installation of odor control covers and for other miscellaneous items of
additional work, and granting a time extension of 79 calendar days, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Acceptina Job No. P2-5R-2
as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 86-55, accepting
Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins "F" and "G" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-5R-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and
approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 3 to the
plane and specifications re That Change Order No. 3 to the plane and
Job No. P2-28-1 specifications for Installation of
Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-28-1, authorizing an addition of $47,310.20 to the contract with
Ziebarth 6 Alper, for removal of old paint and application of a new epoxy system
of coating on portions of the building ceiling not under contract, removal of
wiring and cable trays not specified originally, modifications to the filtrate
line installation, and for other miscellaneous items of additional work, be, and
is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the -
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. I to the plans and
Job No. P2-29 specifications for Rehabilitation of
Primary Sedimentation Basins D 6 R at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-29, authorizing an addition of $735.00 to the contract
with Advanco Constructors, Inc., for modification of scum platform covers on the
basins, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 2 to the
_ plane and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
Job No. PW-134 specifications for Launder Discharge
Level Valve System, Job No. PW-134,
deleting the installation of new launder valves in Basins 3, 4 and 5 and
delivering said valves to the warehouse for later installation, and adding the
installation of District-furnished digester gas pressure relief valves on
Digesters C, D, F and G, with no change in completion time nor the cost of the
contract with Riewit Pacific Co., be, and is hereby, approved.
-6-
06/11/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duty carried:
Approving Cbange Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications re That Change Order No.- 1 to the plans and
Job No. PW-144 specifications for Waste Sidestream and
Sludge Pump Stations, Comminutor and
Scum System Improvements, Job No. PW-144, authorizing an addition of $5,203.00 to
the contract with Floyd Construction Company and Martin A. Kordick, A Joint
Venture, for installation of additional PVC electrical conduit, and payment of an
early completion bonus provided for in the contract documents, be, and is hereby,
approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order "A" to
Purchase Order No. 19777 with That Change Order "A" to Purchase Order
Transamerica Delaval re Job No. 19777 with Transamerica Delaval to
No. PW-092 Furnish 6 Install 2 Vulcan Rato _
Couplings on Engine Driven Gear Boxes at
Plant 1 Blower Building, Job No. PW-092, authorizing an addition of $68,506.00
plus tax and freight to the contract for realignment of two 1500 hp. engines, gear -
boxes and high speed blowers, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
Job No. J-6-2 specifications for Electrical
Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2,
Job No. J-6-2, adding $21,538.00 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for
additional spare conduits, groundwire loops and concrete encasement of the
conduits, and impact and delay costa resulting from a fire department delay in
inspection of the fuel tanks; and granting a time extension of 13 calendar days
for said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the
plans and specifications re That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and
Job No. P2-31R specifications for Rehabilitation of
Primary Basins A, B, C, B, I, J, K, L,
M, N, O, P and Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R, extending the time allowed for
completion, providing the Districts' an option for the reduction of insurance
coverage, adding an item for collector mechanism repair, setting forth
bonus/penalties for time of completion, and making miscellaneous technical
clarifications and modifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 3 to the -
plans and specifications re That Addendum No. 3 to the plans and
Job No. P2-31R specifications for Rehabilitation of
Primary Basins A, B, C, B, I, J, K, L,
M, N, 0, P and Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R, extending the date for receipt of
bids from May 20th to May 27th, changing the quantities for collector mechanism
repairs, and making miscellaneous modifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
-7-
06/11/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 4 to the
plans and specifications re That Addendum No. 4 to the plans and
Job No. P2-31R specifications for Rehabilitation of
�a1 Primary Basins A, B, C, R, I, J, R, L,
M, N, 0, P and Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R, extending the bid receipt date
from May 27th to May 29th due to conflict with the Memorial Day holiday, changing
the handrail specifications, and making miscellaneous modifications, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Job No. P2-31R to Morley-
Ziebarth 3 Alper, A Joint Venture That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 86-56, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for
Rehabilitation of Primary Basins A, B, C, R, I, J, R, L, M, N, 0, P and Q at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-31R, to Morley-Ziebarth 6 Alper, A Joint Venture, in the amount
of $2,443,500.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications re That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
Job No. J-15A specifications for Prepurchase and
Installation of Variable Frequency Drive
Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15A, transmitting the lease/lease-purchase alternative financing package and
advising prospective bidders that Addendum No. 2 would be forthcoming, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the
plans and specifications re That Addendum No. 2 to the plane and
Job No. J-15A specifications for Prepurchase and
Installation of Variable Frequency Drive
Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15A, extending the date for receipt of bids from May 27th to June 3rd, and
making miscellaneous technical clarifications and modifications, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Job No. J-15A to
General Electric Company That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 86-57, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for
Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for
Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A, to General
Electric Company in the amount of $4,025,440.00, reserving the Boards' right to
exercise a direct purchase or a lease-purchase payment option following evaluation
by the consulting engineers and staff. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
...
-8-
06/11/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Blueprinting, Photocopying
and Related Services, That the bid tabulation and
Specification No. S-037, to recommendation re Blueprinting,
Consolidated Reprographics Photocopying and Related Services,
Specification No. S-037, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said Specification No. S-037 be, and is hereby, awarded to
Consolidated Reprographics in an amount not to exceed $75,000.00 for a one-year
period beginning June 16, 1986.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Sale of Surplus Centrifuge
Equipment, Specification No. S-038 That the bid tabulation and
to International Reserve Equipment recommendation re award of Sale of _
Corporation Surplus Centrifuge Equipment,
Specification No. S-038, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said sale be, and is hereby, awarded to International
Reserve Equipment Corporation in the total amount of $15,000.00.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Third Amendment to the
Amended Joint Powers Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby
Creating an Agency to be known as adopt Resolution No. 86-58, approving
SCCWRP Third Amendment to the Amended Joint
Powers Agreement Creating an Agency to
be known as the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority,
providing for the inclusion of the City of Oxnard as a signatory party to the
Amended Joint Powers Agreement, and terminating the interest of the Ventura
Regional Sanitation District in the Southern California Coastal Water Research
Project effective July 1, 1986. A certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Summons and
Complaint on Stop Notice and Bond, That the Summons and Complaint on Stop
Viron International vs. Dean Notice and Bond, Viron International vs.
Chilton, et al. , Case No. 484560 Dean Chilton, at al., Case No. 484560,
re Job No. P2-28-2 in connection with Ventilation
Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids
Handling, Job No. P2-28-2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized
to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Summons and
Complaint for Damages and That the Summons and Complaint for
Injunctive Relief, International Damages and Injunctive Relief,
Union of Operating Engineers, International Union of Operating
Local 501, AFL-CIO vs. County Engineers, Local 501, AFL-CIO vs. County
Sanitation Districts of Orange Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
County Case No. 489264 California, Case No. 489264, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
-9-
06/11/86
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized
to appear and to engage special counsel to appear and defend the interests of the
Districts, as necessary.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to
deli note members of the Boards That the General Manager be, and is
and or staff to attend and partici- hereby, authorized to designate members
pate in meetings, hearings, of the Boards and/or staff to attend and
conferences, facility inspections participate in meetings, hearings,
and other functions conferences, facility inspections and
other functions which, in his opinion,
will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including,
but not limited to, those conducted by state and federal legislative and
regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies,
California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan
Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental
expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts'
policy and approved annual budget.
ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by
Annual nomination for Chairman the Boards at which nominations are to
of the Joint Administrative be made for the office of Chairman of
Organization the Joint Administrative Organization,
the Secretary declared the nominations
open.
\� Director Don R. Griffin was nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman
of the Joint Administrative Organization.
There being no further nominations, the Secretary reported that the election
would be held at the regular July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of
Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Building Committee That the written report of the Building
Committee dated May 23, 1986, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is
Agreement with Pulaski and Arita, hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
Architects re design of modifica- No. 2 to the Agreement with Pulaski and
tions to the existing Arita, Architects, providing for design
administrative office of modifications to the existing
administrative office.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive
Committee's meeting on May 28, 1986, be,
and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
-30-
06/11/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: .
Receive and file Fiscal Policy
Committee Report That the Fiscal Policy Committee's
report and recommendations re 1986-87
personnel requirements and joint works budgets, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving 1986-87 personnel
requirements and amending That the 1986-87 personnel requirements
Positions and Salaries Resolution be, and are hereby, approved as
No. 79-20 as amended recommended by the Fiscal Policy
Committee; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 86-59,
amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1986-87
personnel requirements. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: -
Approving the 1986-87 Joint
Operating Budget Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Directors Ruth Bailey, Michael Beverage, Richard Buck, Frank Clift,
Norman Culver, Richard Edgar, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Robert
Hanson, Evelyn Hart, Ron Hoesterey, Carol Kawanami, Ursula Kennedy,
Philip Maurer, Sally Anne Miller, Todd Murphy, James Neal, Carrey
Nelson, Chris Norby, Richard Partin, Bob Perry, Ruthelyn Plummer,
Richard Polls, Thomas Riley, Sal Sapien, Don E. Smith, John H. Sutton,
Peer Swan, Charles Sylvia, John Thomas, James Wahner, Dorothy Wedel, 1w.✓
Dewey Wiles.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Don Roth, Roger Stanton
That the Joint Operating Budgets of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1986-87 fiscal year, be, and are hereby, approved and
adopted as follows:
Joint Operating/Working Capital Funds $30,547,000.00
Workers' Compensation Self-Insured Fund 666,000.00
Self-Funded Health Plan Trust Fund 870,000.00 -
Public Liability Self-Insured Fund 652,000.00
-11-
06/11/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Approving the 1986-87 Capital following roll call vote:
Outlay Revolving Fund Budget
AYES: Directors Ruth Bailey, Michael
�►� Beverage, Richard Buck, Frank Clift, Norman Culver, Richard Edgar,
Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, Ron Hoesterey,
Carol Kawanami, Ursula Kennedy, Philip Maurer, Sally Anne Miller, Todd
Murphy, James Neal, Carrey Nelson, Chris Norby, Richard Partin, Bob
Perry, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard Polis, Thomas Riley, Sal Sapien, Don E.
Smith, John H. Sutton, Peer Swan, Charles Sylvia, John Thomas, James
Wahner, Dorothy Wedel, Dewey Wiles
NOES: None
ABSENT: Don Roth, Roger Stanton
That the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint Works Construction) of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, I1, 13 and 14, be, and is
hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of $50,083,000.00.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Modifying contractors' liability
insurance requirements included in That the insurance requirements for
"General Provisions and Standard construction projects included in the
Specifications" re minimum and "General Provisions and Standard
maximum limits to be determined on Specifications - 1984 Edition" be, and
a case-by-case basis are hereby, modified to provide for a
minimum limit for contractors' liability
insurance of $1 million; and,
\� FURTHER MOVED: That the General Counsel and staff be authorized to evaluate
proposed projects on a case-by-case basis and to increase liability insurance
limits up to an aggregate of $5 million depending upon the nature and size of the
project.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amending Section 7.B.7. of the
Districts' Procedures for Selection That Section 7.B.7. of the Districts'
of Professional Engineers and Procedures for Selection of Professional
Architects Engineers and Architects, dated October 12,
1983, be, and is hereby, amended to read as
follows:
• "7. For projects exceeding $25,000 in fees, the firm may, if determined
appropriate by the Selection Committee based on the nature and size of the
project, be required to carry errors and omissions insurance coverage in an
amount determined by the Selection Committee to be adequate for the
project."
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing and directing the
Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate That the Fiscal Policy Committee be, and
proposals obtained by the is hereby, authorized and directed to
Districts' insurance broker and to evaluate proposals obtained by the
place excess liability insurance Districts' insurance broker and to place
`i coverage effective July 1, 1986 excess liability insurance coverage
effective July 1, 1986, said action to
be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular
meeting on July 9, 1986.
-12-
06/11/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: -
Amending Positions and Salaries
Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, That the Boards of Directors hereby
to reclassify Collection Facilities adopt Resolution No. 86-60, amending
Division positions Positions and Salaries Resolution
No. 79-20, as amended, to reclassify
Collection Facilities Division positions. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratifying action of the Executive
Committee in directing General That the action of the Executive
Counsel and staff to engage Committee in directing General Counsel
consultants to study and prepare a and staff to engage the following
report on long-term debt financing consultants to study and prepare a
alternatives report on long-term debt financing
alternatives, be, and is hereby,
ratified:
(1) Mudge, Rose, Guthrie, Alexander and Pardon, bond counsel
(2) Bartle Wells Associates, financial consultant
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the
Report on long-term debt financing Fiscal Policy Committee had been studying
alternatives long-term financing for some time. At the
suggestion of Director Peer Swan, the
Committee had discussed potential advantages of issuing tax-exempt securities
prior to September 1, 1986 when the currently favorable tax laws are scheduled to
expire by Congressional action. This matter was also reviewed by the Executive
Committee, and because of potential benefits to the Districts and the impending
"sunset" of existing tax-exempt financing provisions, the Committee authorized
engagement of the consulting firms of Bartle Wells and Associates, financial
consultants, and Mudge, Rose, Guthrie, Alexander and pardon, bond counsel, to
assist the Districts with consideration of issuance of long-term, tax-exempt,
debt financing to fund construction of joint works sewage facilities and to make
a report to the Joint Boards at the June llth meeting.
The Joint Chairman then introduced Mr. Alan Watts, Associate of Thomas
L. Woodruff, the Districts' General Counsel; Mr. Ed Long from Mudge, Rose,
Guthrie, Alexander and pardon, bond counsel; and Me. Lora Stovall from Bartle
Wells Associates, financial consultant. He advised that these consultants had
been invited to the meeting to report on and answer any questions the Directors
may have on long-term capital financing alternatives.
The Director of Finance then reviewed the long-term financial projections of the
Districts, previously provided to the Directors, which reflect a need for
additional funding for most Districts. Be also reviewed the long-term financing
alternatives under consideration by the Fiscal Policy Committee.
The Chair then recognized Lora Stovall of Bartle Wells Associates, financial
consultant. She further reviewed the Districts capital project financing
requirements over the next five to ten year horizons, and the assumptions used
for the projections, and the existing and potential alternative funding sources
to pay for construction of said facilities. The Districts have substantial cash
• -13-
06/11/86
reserves but not enough for all of the projects that will be required.
Ms. Stovall reviewed the financial statue of each District. She explained that
Districts' position is very strong at this point and they can readily obtain
loans. This may not be the situation in five years when they could be in a
financially weak position. The lists of projects planned for the next three
years greatly strengthens the Districts' ability to borrow at this time based on
existing federal laws.
The consultant also commented on the various sources available to generate
additional revenue such as ad valorem taxes and user fees to supplement Operating
Funds, and federal and state grants, connection fees, user fees and long-term
securities to supplement Capital Funds. Issuance of tax-exempt Certificates of
Participation for capital financing was the alternative before the Boards for
consideration.
Ms. Stovall then reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of various long-term
capital financing methods. She also discussed the relative merits of issuing
fixed-interest rate versus variable-interest rate securities.
The Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion of the Districts' long-term
requirements, alternative financing methods and the advantages and disadvantages
of issuing Certificates of Participation to partially finance the capital
construction needs, including the fixed-interest rate versus variable-interest
rate debt securities and the potential for increased investment returns based
upon the spread between the Districts' investment earnings and the currently
lower interest rate for variable-rate debt. It was also pointed out that both
fixed and variable rate securities could be issued. Also discussed were the
legal requirements, procedures and scheduling for issuing Certificates of
Participation. Although a decision whether or not to proceed needs to be made at
this time, any District electing to proceed with a sale could rescind that
decision at a later date.
The individual Boards then caucused to consider whether to proceed with planning
to issue tax-exempt Certificates of Participation to finance joint works
facilities.
The Director of Finance advised that this matter would be evaluated initially on
a District-by-District basis and, later, collectively by the Joint Boards. If
several of the Districts decide to go forward with bonding, it was suggested that
this be structured as one issue, although it is possible to have a mix of
variable-rate and fixed-rate interest on securities.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 6 14 It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
Directing consultants, counsel and
staff to proceed with planning for That the consultants, counsel and staff
issuance of tax-exempt Certificates be directed to proceed with preparation
of Participation for sale prior to of the necessary documents/legal
September 1, 1986 opinions and carry out the additional
tasks necessary to prepare for issuance
of tax-exempt Certificates of Participation prior to the September 1, 1986
deadline.
The respective Boards asked for further information to be provided to their
Directors and the Boards of Districts 2 and 3 declared their intent to adjourn to
June 18th to further consider the matter.
-14-
06/11/86
DISTRICTS 11 6 13 It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
Declaring intent not to proceed
with issuance of long-term debt That the consultants, counsel and staff
securities be directed not to proceed with planning
for issuance of long-term debt financing
for construction of joint works sewage facilities.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 6 14 Following a report by the General
Authorizing Fiscal Policy Committee Counsel it was moved, seconded and duly
to select bond underwriter for carried:
long-term debt securities
That the Fiscal Policy C cam ittee be, and
is hereby, authorized and directed to solicit proposals and select a bond
underwriter for issuance of tax-exempt Certificates of Participation.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Director of
Finance to certify claims and That the Director of Finance be, and is
forward to County Auditor for hereby, authorized to certify claims and
payment forward to the Orange County auditor for
immediate payment for expenditures
incurred after June 30, 1986, and that he declare that such certification shall
comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for
payment of claims against the Districts until the 1986-87 budgets are adopted by
the respective Districts.
DISTRICT 1 It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 108 That proposed Ordinance No. 108, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 104 Establishing Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 105, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and
is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 108 by title only.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting Ordinance No. 108 following roll call vote:
That Ordinance No. 108, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 104
Establishing Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 105, be adopted:
AYES: Directors Ron Hoesterey, Chairman, Dan Griset, Robert Hanson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Roger Stanton
DISTRICT I Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:28 p.m., June 11, 1986.
-15-
06/11/86
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation No. 62 -
Schaefer Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. -86-61-2, ordering
annexation of 3.332 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Willdan
Road and Pleasant Place in the City of Anaheim (proposed Annexation No. 62 -
Schaefer Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2). A certified copy of
this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 The General Counsel reported that a
Receive and file claim of Aero Tech claim had been filed with the District
Plating, Inc. and Vinod Shah by kern Tech Plating, Inc. and Vinod
Shah. The firm is one of the three
companies which the Districts filed enforcement actions against in Superior Court
last month relative to violations of their industrial waste permits. The claim is
in excess of $1,750,000.00. Mr. Woodruff indicated that the Districts would
continue to diligently prosecute the case against Aero Tech Plating inasmuch as
their violations are of a very serious nature.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the claim submitted by the attorney representing Aero Tech Plating, Inc. and
Vinod Shah, dated May 27, 1986, in the amount of $1,750,000.00 plus attorneys
fees, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be referred to the District's General Counsel and
liability claims administrator for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
�d That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to Wednesday,
June 18, 1986, at 6:30 p.m. to review the long-term debt financing
alternatives. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:28 p.m., June 11, 1986.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to Wednesday,
June 18, 1986, at 8:00 p.m. to review the long-term debt financing
alternatives. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:28 p.m., June 11, 1986.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:28 p.m., June 11, 1986.
DISTRICT 6 It was moved, seconded and duly carried: -
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 608 That proposed Ordinance No. 608, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
\� No. 606 Pertaining to Sewer Connection Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and
is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 608 by title only.
-16-
06/11/86
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting Ordinance No. 608 following roll call vote:
That Ordinance No. 608, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 606
Pertaining to Sewer Connection Charges, be adopted.
AYES: Directors James Wahner, Chairman, Ruthelyn Plummer
NOES: None
ABSENT: Roger Stanton ,
DISTRICT 6 It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 609 That proposed Ordinance No. 609, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 607 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 607, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and
is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 609 by title only.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting Ordinance No. 609 following roll call vote:
That Ordinance No. 609, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Sanitary
Sewer Service Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 607, be adopted.
AYES: Directors James Wahner, Chairman, Ruthelyn Plummer
NOES: None
ABSENT: Roger Stanton
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:28 p.m., June 11, 1986.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Contract No. 7-2C-4
as complete That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 86-62-7, accepting
Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4, as complete, authorizing execution
of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plane and apecifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
Contract No. 7-7 specifications for Main Street Pump
Station, Contract No. 7-7, authorizing
-17-
06/11/86
an addition of $35,999.88 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. , for
installation of temporary sewage bypass, additional waterproofing to the outside
concrete walls, installation of a ductile iron spool, and other miscellaneous
items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is
Engineering Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
Boyle Engineering Corporation re No. 4 to the Engineering Services
Contract No. 7-7 Agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation for design of the Main
Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7, for project inspection services due to
Districts' staff shortages.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve Staff
Report re expansion of Zone 2 That the Staff Report dated June 2,
adjacent to the Irvine Business 1986, re expansion of Zone 2 adjacent to
Complex area the Irvine Business Complex area,
established for the purpose of fixing
connection fees as provided in Ordinance No. 719, to incorporate major development
proposals within that area, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved.
DISTRICT 7 It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
Introduction and first reading of
Proposed Ordinance No. 720 That proposed Ordinance No. 720, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 718 Establishing Separate Zones within the District and Establishing a
Schedule of Fees for Issuance of Sewer Connection Permits and Repealing Ordinance
No. 719, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety, be and is hereby,
waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 720 by title only, it was then moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 720, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 718 Establishing Separate Zones within the District and Establishing a
Schedule of Fees for Issuance of Sewer Connection Permits and Repealing Ordinance
No. 719, be introduced and passed to the second reading on July 9, 1986.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:28 p.m., June 11, 1986.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:28 p.m., June 11, 1986.
-18-
06/11/86
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:28 p.m., June 11, 1986.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:28 p.m., June 11, 1986.
Secretary, Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts Noe. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-19-
FUND AO JI' rl'l 01. FIfl4 C'I 1111 I9CCF.SSINO DATE 5/.F/116 PAGE I
NEPO!,T NURhLK .Cr93 _ .. . . .. __. .
C114ill ;'.LCITAIIE-4 ❑ISTRLCTS OF OPPNCE COUh TY
CLA7RS IAID 15/14/86
_.. _.. . .. _._ . .. ... ... .. _- .. _- _ . .._ -. . _... .____.
L'A PP PANT 11U. vC NI'.ON ANOUNT DE SCRIPT I4N
-..07••997 IVO•Pa 1pr •N i0f1 .. . _. . $313.76. .. . .._. PRINTING
07559E AIV%Y3U 7C'flcH1 TS. ICE. 1396.3E OTRUCKFFICE
PARTS
0is"14 A1VI CLO :rF iLC SL6 WIC.... 1548.10 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1 '
07595n AIF rQAO. 4I'1 EAT CHEMICAL
_.. -$576.18 _._. ..__.ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ------- -
G75951 tlf %00GUC 1S R f.TOOLSAI INC. $143.26 TOOLS OPERATIONS SUPPLIES
a 79962 AL[AAYDf.P POW Ell TOLL:: 5193.2E TOOLS
n7 M. - . ILL AYf._ojp.N ACFNPI I .__. 62L23__. .. ._ ._.. .._. __-CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS-- ----- -- - -, . `�
075955 EJ: ALL Ef. ,823.2 STEEL DRUM DISPOSAL
075955 ALLIED CON FOP4TION $2,B23.20 CHEMICAL IONGULANTS
__47.485L...__.._.-_ENAE IC➢N-FL(EET AA.3IlCIELr S20.::0 __-_-.SUBSCRIPTION -----.
d7 C�"57 AMLr ICtW FLEET FPRTS 120.17 TRUCK PARTS
679958 ANFCICAN Mf NAGFMENT ASSOC. 5625.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATIOWMIKE DEBLIEUK /
___ (•iR?6`. - .lP�LaICN N._CIEN.11 E.1L.ENDCU.C].5____.__ _...._.a 693..00.__.._..__ -.__-_.__.. LAB SUPP.LI ES_ _--
07956h - AMERICAN TCCHNICAL SUPFLY $49.61 CAMERA SUPPLIES
079961 ANAHEIM BUSINESS MACHINES 5215.39 OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR
SA ........ D - .EMERGENCY-SENGRI�I NLR6PAIR-DI ST-.#S --- -
C75979963 RN[LAUS $195.03 LAB SERVICES
m 075964 THL ANCHO➢ PACKING CO. S9.309.77 PUMP PARTS
XC799E5 __._ .. ..._9•V9. EEh_C Rn F-A, _.__. SSaLCEa47_.___.-._.____AN IOMIC.ROLYMFR---_____._..... :.
075566 ASSOCIATED LARURATOF'IES A930.00 LAB SERVICES
to 07^967 THE Al L SF RAILWAY CO. $3,802.90 TRACK REMOVAL 6 REPLACEMENT/CONTR 2-6-2
._W75P6B__ ...._.-._Aur Lp.1-.Y.LBEIL DEEMING SERVICE S61 AP AUD1O-TARES -------- - '
-11 0795FS AU70 SHGF' EUUIFMLHT CO. 1966.72 EQUIPMENT PARTS
D C79577 AUTO VEIGF CO. $716.96 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
_.1 Q7997.L_._.. ..._...M6D _7iSIFPS . _. kla2T2..12_..__._.__._.__.._-_TRUCK-PARTS.._.__-__...-.___-...
079972 FKK COAPQRATION 390,165.J9 SLUDGE DISPOSAL ..
079973 CAeCKCFT-6PITMEY CO. 5199.73 PUBLICATION
_INSTRUMENTATION-6QUIPMEN�PARTS---- --
079575 POPIRT ECIN,UILLIAN FNOST Sd U6.50 ENGINEERING 5-27 i 1
07557E OOLSA RAD16TOR SERVICE $163.20 TRUCK PARTS {
NF.E. I LECth IC__-.____. ..__.__--._._SE8,
075578 PUCKEYE GAS PRODUCTS $20.05 PROPANE
079975 BUI1.01114 NEWS, INC. $48.33 PUBLICATION II
_..2 Utl _ .._ _ -BIJEE➢U. Vf CSL4_AES.Ekb CM __ _.4195..G.O_.__.__-SEMINAR-REGI STRATIOWCORINNE-CLAVSON- - -- - - -I
11759N1 WILLIAM H. DUTLLN $324.62 PETTY CASH
07.5A2 CI'N C6Rk(9 ATION 1170.30 OPERATOR TRAINING/LAB EQUIPMENT
679543.. ... ...-- CAL m.fHE11.CPAES --__-- _.___.�.__....J 135.14 . _ _..___ __SAFETY-SUPPLIES------ .. ' I
079584 CALTROL . INC - 52,d20.1L• VALVE
879965 CALIF6ARIA DYNAMICS 357.36 EQUIPMENT PARTS
-W792Pfi.. __SABEf- TCA�LER_. _. -3L 327.62 _.__.__SAFETY..SUPPLIES- . ... . _. .___ .. -
0490 JOIN CAROLLC FNClflFhS 5725..0 REVIEW DISTRICT REPORT/ADVANCED PRIMARY TREATMENT
.75 5P8 CHIHIFS W. CARTER CO. 52.522.80
.. CALL - - --- - - EQUIPMENT PAR"
796? LFF ! ECV11MtNI 51. _ - - - TRUCK PARTS
074590 C L STf MG $5,91P.79 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
ENT
07951 ENAIJANC
-
L. EETc CP.. INC. 161.:3 PUBLICATION
LAB SAMPLES
I ��
FUND NO ^1`4 VT hlSI KOPKIMC CAI ITAL PROCf SSING DATC 5/:I✓/bf. PAGF S r
.6EFORT.BCF:bLR_AP93..._ ___._ -_-_.... ... .._. _
COUNTY SAfd TAROS DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CV INS PAID 65/l4/Bk � IC
i
YARRA kT hO VE NUOF AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
'1!Vf 5T .INCH ... _ ------- __ _ _. ._-_5337.b5_. __..._ _..._-EBEI6NC CHARGES______._
n75999 fhf MWCST INDUSTPIES• IfIC. $23.'15.99 FERRIC CHLORIDE/FERROUS CHLORIDE ,1I:
u79955 CHROhALOY SALES 1879.38 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
_074496_. __ .-COMPUl ED 04 TICNM.-_ __ __ ______ _ 3423.15__ .---- -OFEICE EQUIEMENT._RERAIR -
. ..__
U79997 COl IIf LL G.M. PARTS - 11D4.43 TRUCK PARTS
675496 C04%0LIPATED ELECTRICAL PIST. $5.688.25 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
V754`9 _ __ EQII OLIUEIEL 8FF6OGR 8f cICS__ -._ ___ A619.95 -_-______..BLUEPRINTING-REPRODUCTION--
096"t CONTKOLCO $60.36 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
5630C1 COSTn MFSk AUTO PARTS. IAC. $83.99 TRUCK PARTS
-__ REGION _ -_LOU111Y. 6bOLES9LL_ELLClRtf _11,16.2.23_—___-_ELECTRICALSUPRLIEi __. -._
b8060 CHRRLFS F. CPOWLEY CG. 5241.G8 EQUIPMENT PARTS
OBiG04 CAL PATER 1298.45 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL II.
__ GP•16C%-- .___ . CUu1SV_lUBP.G REPUILEIM4_..-. __..____--_..__._.}268.26__ .---._..__TRUCK PARTS__
CAL
STATE UNIV. FULLERTOK 536.862.30 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT
C806Lu
}B UGf7 CST. INC. }275.60 INSECTICIDE
JSLG49ICHAEL P. DED__- _ _S21.62 _LEGALAOVMETINGf ..._ ___.... I
J646C9 DECIIkFI R. Cl6L1lUY $405.04 EMPLOYEE MEETING EXPENSE
06se1u DECO 5405.0 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -
X Ghli 1_ ___. _ OE CILELLL_$34h5._6L<,-5_ER.____ .________ElOL Sfi.________._-FURNISH $_INSTALL_GLASL-___—__.____.
= OSCU12 CELTA ANALYTICAL DIV. $722.07 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
�-• OBJP13 DEG-FAF. SALES E SERVICE 5127.98 LINE CLEARING EQUIPMENT.
.� OBilL4 TRCILPARTS
.� 0ACG15 CILSEL LOGISTICS. INC. $562.93 EQUIPMENT REPAIR � I
V bC41F OIG17kl EQUIPMENT CORP. 1637.30 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
n__O611'17__ _._ .. - VQPAPS_EN.IEEF RISES. INC._-___.__-___. ._.-55.849.95.-...._-___._-__CONTRACTOR
N CBJ118 CCIIM-OLIVER. INC. 1767.18 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
J83C1V DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 5488.13 PAINT SUPPLIES .� .
.._- . OBU021l -. _. . __ .E EST CAN+JHL.__.____-_-_______ _5311SAGS_--__.___OEEICE_3UPPLIES- q
GB.C21 CBIRMAFU LI;UTPHENT $77.0.9 TRUCK PARTS I )
8BJV22 CAVIL EROMAMP $18.90 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
__. fCZEL nEEICESUPPLIES-- ... _ . .
66.1.24 FEDERAL EYF'RESS CORE . 1658.75 DELIVERY SERVICES -
066625 FILTER SUPPLY CO. 41.546.83 ENGINE PARTS
_CBI 26_ _ ___t I_ChLR_.I EORTER__CG._.___. _ -. -___ 52.27 U.B.5 __REGULATOR.PARTS.- '---- ..._ _.. I
J6t C27 FLRT S VERTICAL CCkCRLTE f286.06 CONCRETE CUTTING
N86(20 FLC SYSTEMS $1.025.02 PUMP PARTS Ij
CI LI OE_EOUN TA lIL-V111LL___.__.___ __ __ }828.9E__..__.___.____WATEB.USAGE.__-_-
ORE 03O F4IFLAY TdbCN FA975 4117.84 TRUCK PARTS
Obu03l F.U17 OROLERS LRPOh ATORV• INC. 131.04 LAB SERVICES
__.CAA,32 _ _. ____.C IT Y. Of fULLE87ON ___._._._. ..--. ._.. _. . ._.___._._ 16 O.Sh __.__ _______._WATER.USAGE -
.Ih0633 TRUCK a PUS CP.OUFIEM S55.917.12 TRUCKS ! �
68Jv34 Gt'NLJAL fLECTPIC Su] PLV CO. 11f5.36 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
C8;435 . . _ 4Cid6EL SIKL CQMPAhT _. _. _ __..._._._ .. _. .._ __1191.62. _._.__ .. .... .__PUMP PARTS _. ..... ._ .
CA1636 6-NPAL 1FLCFHONE CO. $4.2.16.46 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES I
Otli 5!7 CZ�=h.RZT•S. INC. $2.183.IU TRUCK PARTS
_.._ CILRL1"SHcMI1ChLLL._ INC._.. .. ___ ..__ ._ .__._14•_2tl.]2_. . _. . . ..._MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
FUND NO 4rt . - JT PINT LukkING f<i11:1 PPOCESSIN4 GATE 5/'J./9h FACE r
i,UFdF-AP4&
C NNfY SANITATION UISTN ICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
C 441NS PAID J5/14/9E
- ____.__._.___. _._._..._._.._..___._ -__
PARRRNI kG. yFN LDn AMOUNT OF SCRSPTION
agi•1.:" ___..I! 4 k. FCN16L 5_ __. .. ._ __. ._.._.. _ _. . ._..... _.}Ea 491aO4 __. .__ _ ..._-...EQU I BRENT RENTAL______.__.
C8Gd4P VACHGEOR CO7.ANY $36$857.37 LAB SUPPLIES
R092 L PHEF 1. MALL CO. 3363.09 VALVE
LEE cg2. ._NFL ILO.I D3.OS+6tlf.1I1£ai24LiL. SUMP-,PARTS- -_ _ _. ..
8I ,43 h4 .INETON INDUSTFIAL PLAS11T5 32J5.28 VALVE
48044 hJLH S TUTTLE DAISUM 336.57 TRUCK PARTS
LA1 h4S - pvy Sf OF HA[7}AICF �.T 6.fl 14 ._BATTERIES-_-_.___.__ _
. _. .-
C9f.46 C.S. OF HUN CO.. NINC, 3124.03 HARDWARE L.
Ok VG47 CITY OF HUNTINCHDk BF.ACh 38.271.O3 HATER USAGE 1'^
8q X4P -_____PUP TI[IT_TON P[�tl 'E EF STAND }$.L.-6T nFFILE3UPBLiEL __... .
O gnCt5 hUhTINGTON SUPPLY $58.48 HARDWARE
Jtll[ .9 Fn aNCi6 HY ANG 375.0G RENDERING FOR PROJECT J-15-2
.SUPPLIES.
UB 3052 I.S.I. YES1 ,143,26 VALVE
OR3653• IMFEFIALI TILT OISTRIDUTOF5 S1,911.26 FLOOR TILE
_--ps '*'L+1__.._-_ INUU$IPI LIST CHEMICAL it Al 2.96 HARDWARE LORIDE ------- 'I
4R0C.5 IN6RAM IAL THREADED PRODUCTS ,943.72 HARDWARE
fYl Oh! 896 INiffo FAFEP 32.993.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES t�
X fl!tf t`Z.__ ..._ _._INIJKIE RANCH
DSSTRICh.LNf_--._ ..}p$4.B5---___-OFEILE-SURPLLES-- ------- -
-rG8 Fu59 IP YI Y.E P4hLH WATER DISTk ICI 59.CU WATER USAGE --- --- ��
W 58059 CHARLES A. JACKS $36.12 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
---14LUM R_a J.AAMISON s2.2U 8.no ENGINEERING e._.P . ea_^a _.__._......__ ..
- q RCfl THE JANITOR-S SIIGPPE 1377.59 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES .' .
3� 18G962 JLLLIh'K. SCHWARTZ. CONNOLLY $2.343.97 LEGAL SERVICES/ANALYZE.SUPERFUND LIABILITY
1 ,94yJ63 .. _FAM k Y6A elI@6$ R, £L'.�_L.Y-._.._-._. __...._ _J4a42fi.5➢.-._._-.___ __-BEARINGS--..
e .'64 KA4 SAFETY FRODUCTS $266.92
SAFETY SUPPLIES
uB )065 KEFhAN SUPPLY $466.40 VALVE
C116L6118 Q_ _. _ _MUG 9LARlINC. a1UL s$84 N1 OFFRINGE-.
C8046T FRoy,LAURS INC. $79.50 OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR
F94U9 LA UFSEM COLOR LAB 379.50 FILM PROCESSING
-_ i6.100.__ ..._____.J..SL_6 p0_S9NSULIING__LS iNa_. ___._._._.__._.322a$52.21__._-.-_ ENGINEERING R2.§&=2.-R2.2$.-p l_2;_3.P1=24p _. .
08.0671 LCRKEk ELECTRIC
7NC.CO. 568.16 FILM PROCESSING
UB0071 IEk CG EICCTNIC CO. $56k.1E ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
.__ kBaL . _ � -__ SAFET S URRLIES __ _
6RG173 LILLY TYPESIETTING SI8u.21 PRINTING
58v07q MU IUfL AP. INC.
SL B5 J.00 OPERATOR TRAINING/LAB EQUIPMENT
01226
06107}.____ . ._ _..JOHNI. FMALLOY JNf.._....._.__-- .. -._..-.. ._.._. ..132,71.1.I3__.___ .--._..__ . CONTRACTOR ENGINEERING 5-19-R2_$1.32-6 R1.26_
08J076 JOHN T. RVALVE i$4,423.38 CONTRACTOR 5-19•R2
086377 MAn1UL. A VALVE SUPPLY 3q.g23.38
_QLi0_F _.___ Le VALVE
T 4Ff LOP. ._.._. ..___._ 379.4E ._ ._._.. --- FREIGHT CHARGES - --- i
JB 79 FAIL LHLGY INC. $335.96 PUMP PARTS
oeol)plup'ilb: 14 M TIR CAnP U- f LY CO. 91h9.62 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
YR.i-'hp._ _.. hi f.Sl IUIPFAPPLIANCE . .. . ....._ ... 676.12 _ _ _.. ..FREIGHT CHARGES gR4fk2 MILE. SAFETY APPLIANCES CG $1.- 76.12 SAFETY SUPPLIES
AP vv83 Mlol'Eu bUPoTI[H cGNSTC.UCi 101. CO $72.91 G.14 CONTRACTOR 2-6-2 I-I
LLP...CLUE6NY_____.__._ .. _ ___-_ ___3328.4E.. _ .._._ _._._ ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE-
i.
FUAU NO 01•" - JI •11SI MONKIN4 CAPETAI PROCESSING UATF 5/J8/86 PAGE
REPORT. NUNEE"EA3__
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY TI
CLAIKS PAID 45/14/86
._-.._ .. .. . .... . _ .. . .._ . _.. _.._. .__..._. _ � __ . _..__-._ _.___._-.�.��.��.�..._ .. _ ..j•
ylpP AkT MO. YF NUOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION `
ne;_.F� ,. . . _ . . IANt.TT;QNL?Y LFP PP 610ALi ..___. _._.. _. ._..12.1f5.00 . . ..
xICHAEL P. MOORE $492.07 -- --EMPLSERVIMES-- I
GeCJB6 TRPLOYEE 'MEfTlxc EIU'ENfE
8640h9 FO .N CRA41 cf... INC. S2.811•31 TRUCK PARTS
,
J1tli08h ... ..__. . __ PY Eh S.1 IP[ . UFCLY__. .__. ______.- ___._.___.L242.S5 ____. ..._.-"�RU[KPARTS- .."._
08i FR9 NAT ILNAL CCL ANOik AI NIC DATA 656.40 PUBLICATION
up JJSA NATIGN<L PLANT SFFVICCE. INC. $1.937.50 I•
MOVE OIL SPILL-DIST. 11
._061D41 .. . fill-OF
NEYF:➢RT..lCACtl---.---------.-.--LB.1L __-_ -_.__._._.
J60092 NUMAIIC FNOINFERING $687.42 HATER-USAGE'--
COMPRESSOR
08J0.3 IMF. OHMAPT CORD S830.0D LAB SUPPLIES
__iBL04i- ➢L7tlF1L CnEU1CAL-C" LaS fiGI2_ ___.___ BULKTNLOR IN _.__-..._
(86055 Ln.S 1:4E COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1274.76 I �
OB•IPa6 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ONAN6f COAST WINDOW CLFANING $55.00
... -. i•fi P47_, ➢PCB ILOCILJ:➢a_1N[..____-._-_-_._.1261.l4__._..._ CLEAN AIR O KLT. 2
--- --- " CONGTRUC710N IUATE
' ITER'fACS---'-'-
:8N098 Ox YCEN SCRy10E l26A.74 OXYGEN
1GEf•99 COUNTY OF ORANGE 4104.31
___4R.^_lil:i_.______._C.LMLIL➢F-EIfl8h1iF sa._u PURVEYING SERVICES
08J101 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 47.369.93 REIMBURSEW j.
4Bol" PPG INDUSTRIES. INC. L674.06 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP.-INSURANCE FUND
FFI L11•�._....__.. ..t�4ICECASCSNltl1LfL_Sl1EF1L_ yA62.7F I PANT SUPPLIES
._ --PAINT
-.--.-. -
2 GBCIGI PACO FUMFS 319J29.06 PUMP PARTS
'-" 06,1105 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CC. $3.691.96
AFU4.J+ SAFETY SUPPLIES I
-I G8CIC7 PALL PNEUMATIC PRODUCTS $6.969.01 -EQUIPMENT NE740RICTfgpGES- """----'-I•�
EQUIPMENT S PARTS
6R6ILR PARAGON BUSINEESCSS SYSTEMS $2.793.JO +•I•
n ShG1 J3_.. F.AG.iE AINL]M.I7C0_..__. -ll..l6f.38_ PAYROLL SYSTEM P7VOY
,C OBcIIO PEAT. MAMPICR, M71➢NCLL L CO. L9$832.85 MICROCOMPUTER REQUIREMENTS STUDY
(8C111 FO NJ...S PUMP SBJ2.85 PUMP PARTS
_._O8L112. ._-_ ._. ..FC740-.FESLCtl._.__._.____-.---- -�Llll•12 -EMPLOYEE"MEETING•-E%PENS' -- " -_
68UI13 FFT10-FUR.• C EAIIIP. L0. $248645 PUMP PART} I..
BDJ111 ikf JL (RAIN INGUSTA TES 3298•♦5 TRUCK PARTS
_.08fL135 ._ _..___VULAlX EP IARITA ACC_.—_.___.-_._�-L10.09�.. . _.
OR4116 f•UL RiKI L PRITA AxC IIITFC.Tb L7.969.J9 - TECTU--""—""---"--'
OA0117 PUMP LN6INLERINb CO. 3561.J8 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES/J-)-A I.
_...-. JBGlltl._ . ._ ..- RAFELR.l Y- LNIZI ALT10NAL.JPUCKS_ PUMP PARTS I,
J6i119 RR INCUV DISPOSAL CO. 5583640 TRASH DISPOSAL
--- -JF612J PCP VALVE Co.. INC. $375.28
CbU21.._ _.._ ._ _EEOAUy-LLPR__..-_ SI.i9.tu.__ PIPE SUPPLIES
__.-..----'.-__ 7FMPOMRY PERVI CES--.-." ._._..__..
CbE122 BEPUIR IC ENGINES $21.76
68,223 THC RFPUULIC SUPPLY CO. 6N5.11 TRUCK PARTS
LR0121. . _.RICHARDS. VAISON...UBF1FAISS..._. __.. 15f..855.L.._ _ _. .. . _ PIPE SUPPLIES
"' ""'" - "- -LEGAL SERVICES/EMPLOYEE NEGOTIATIONS
Lk x125 FONRM fNG InCCP IMG CO. SL R39.80 INSTRUMENTATIONN EQUIPMENTT REPAIR
Jbu126 R4.<.L1'UUNT. INC. 3981.7E
. Qtl.127 LY?b^n[iC0 __ _._. __ .. ... .. _ -I Ili.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
ION EQUIPMENT PARTS.
ONO12F JOtC2P I. NYERSGN i SON. INC. $317.42
' "_ -"
On.,129 `iNCUN C116INFEPINC . IKE 32 275. ,u HARDWARE
➢yL.]JV.. ._. . . . SARIS AMA CLECIKIC IIOT.ONS-__ . . .__ _.._ -13.1.8( POLYURETHANE LINING/[BENT CAL CONTAINMENT SLAB
--- " '"' ELECTRIC MOTOR -
� I•
FUND NO JI PIm) 600KING C.If Tat PPOCCSSING DATE: b/08/86 PAGE .. r
REPORT
COUNTY ;ANI TLTION DISTRICTS OF UP.A NGE COUNTY
CLAIMS iAID 0$/14/Nb
VARR ANT 6i1. Yi NL OIi AMOUNT DESCP.IPTTON
i .
s'i,.Nci APPLIC_A.SSNF IAL'E. ._ ___....... ___.. .. __.. 57,418.95._ _ . _. . __.._.. EAN MONITORING
080133 Sf CITY
O SeALICLTION IN 7'1. CURL 857$114.38 OCEAN MONITORING _
PR 0333 EITT Of Se AL 6CA Ch 5119.38 WATER USAGE „ S.•
._12.6A6.00 ACCESS KEY_CARBSLEIIIAY�ALELPLL..2..__.... _. . ...
08:139 S0 SM1FOAST GOOUF 395.Op TRUCK PARTS
p8U13F SO11lh COAST DODGE S100.81 TRUCK PARTS
_. _0812SA SO.TC!LIIf.P LIE._ESEV $947,36.--_.__.._.—PURER .._..__--_. .__.—_.__._ . _. '•I .
ON 7139 S0. CALIF. UNTIE SERYIC ,577.16 FURNACE PARTS f
OBc139 S0U1HEkN COUNTIES OIL CO. $0.577.16 DIESEL FUEL
_U@I131 �S.TAR TOO.LI SU JE1JLOLMG1f1..... s 52.50 TOOLS PPLIES ___... _._..._
CE YtrI ST Ap TOOL 1 SUffLY CO. I1.D52.5G TOOLS
CP.i.141 SCOTT STEVENS $32.34 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE I'
eP.;143_.. _.._. __.sMJ±BSl 5III6 12U5.A5___...
_._--._._..._57EELJu81XG._._
De. SUPELCO, INC. $155.D7 LAB SUPPLIES
OBu195 THE SUPPLIERS $2.871,10 TOOLS/SAFETY SUPPLIES )
_.M.L<6_._._SMiLILA?IG._fa. E3911.03 PIPE KIIPPIIFP
Od.1g7 7 8 C INDUSTRIAL CUPITROLS. INC $294.54 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
FTT 08019P TONY'S LOCK E SAFL SLRVICE $511.50 LOCKSMITH SERVICES
_
_X k$4134__.. . _..___Stl NISANbK1SA...QuAVALs1MEi_�_._._ E222.1fi_—__ ELEETBICAL SUPPLIES _____„_
� PAO153 7411SAFERICA DELAVAL $8.545,62 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
b0 ORUIEI TRANSMEHIDIAN CHEMICALS. INC. $2.375.21 CAUSTIC SODA
�.-L-@ I2AYEL :ate.9O eIN,FARE_. � . ... '
—� CPL153 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $1,197.13 TRUCK PARTS
n U60154 TRUCKWANE S1.908.O0 TRUCK PARTS
_SITY91'...IILSIUL_�.--._�__ —S18.a6 .__—.__._. —.WATER.USAGE
08015E UNICO ELECTPIC $1,219.32 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I '
080157 UNOCAL $91.50 GASOLINE )
PET`15�L _..JIM LTE Q_CAE.GEL.�ECY3LL_ e22A.A2 DELIVEBYSERNILES _
08G159 VNI SCIENTIFIC 33.88C.51 LAB SUPPLIES
EB1360 VALLEY CITICS SUPPLY CO. $5,026.67 PIPE SUPPLIES ;J
......I851F1'_ _.._KITHAPU_.W._aN_LF NGLU__. .—___.—._.__.__.___.3.119".U.---____EMPLDYEE_MEET I NG-EXPENSE
Gb0If2 VORTEX INDUSTRIES S901.86 WAREHOUSE DOOR REPAIR-PLT. 1
O86163 JOHN R. MAPLES $138.54 ODOR CONSULTANT �, )
.__..—WANKLSUA .EhOIMI. SLAV LCIRTFJL _5275.09 ENGINE.PARTS_._ ....._...___ . .... .
OBC165 WESTERN WHOLESALE Cu. $166.52 TRUCK PARTS
ae'leb LILLGAP. ASSGCIATE.S Lb.202.66 TRUNK SEWER MASTER PLAN UPDATE/DIST. 2, 3
._. _.O E.!:IL7. ._.__.... .... kOrJhIhCTQI, C9HFf L5SQE. __.___..__.._._ . ..._ ..__32 a133.]E ..._ _EQUIPMENT PARTS__._.._.__.._ '__.__.___ ...... r
CBS 16 XEROX CORP. $3 . 0 COPIER LEASE
GdC 169 GE nhGf. YAi:L $479
LLY ASSOCIATES S9T9.80 VALVES
TAR.K CU. _ _. .._._. . 56----_—ENGINE PARTS ._. ._ _. _. .._.....
UDE171 211 TEMFOPAEI' PCRSOUNFL 3712.1,A TEMPORARY HELP
---- I I
TOTAL CLAIMS f17M1 a-/Iq/IF 3796.a23.7N _
as =
I
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/08/86 PAGE 6
_. -. _. .._-.__. ... .. .... .__ ... ......._-__ .. . .. ..._.._ _.__....._BEFORE NURBEEB AP43--
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/86
-
/1 OPER FUND _£ 5.22
-_ /2 OPER FUND
/2 ACO FUND 84.603.97
_ 03 OPER FUND____ _ 2,300.84
05 OPER FU - 1,792.69
/5 ACO FUND 19,345.90
/6 OPEN FUND 35.24.
__.._ .p OPER FUND._ _ .._- - $r443.99
III OPER FUND 2,754.66
___05E_6_OPER-FUND _- 4.21
®566 ACO FUND 31.710.31
06E7 OPER FUND - 3.461.01
__JT OPER FUND _�03,44R53 _.--
-.._.__-_
CORE - _ -.__._
SELF FUNDED WORKERS CORP. INSURANCE FUND 7.309.93
JT WORKING CAPITAL 134,366.68 Il
m
X TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0 141 - $796,623.28
[C
n
I
— 41
ji
i
� 1
FUND NO ( i - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/22186 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP47
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 35/28/86
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
180225 AARON BROTHERS APT MARTS 1640.89 FRAMES
000226 ACCU-PRINT .N COPY $48.55 PRINTING
08022T AOVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. $488.024.65 CONTRACTOR P2-29, 7-7 6 P2-5R-2
086226 MAYNE W. AEGERTER $283.03 REIMBURSE PAYROLL DEDUCTION
082229 AERCCORP. INC. $2,423.00 ENGINE REPAIR
980230 AIRCO INDUSTRIAL GASES $7,578.95 LIQUID OXYGEN
080231 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. 1425.42 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
587232 AIM PRODUCTS L CHEMICAL INC. $1.405.81 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
080233 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. $174.00 VALVE
080234 AMCAICAN CYANAMID $18.825.34 CATIONIC POLYMER
P80235 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH $60.00 -- - INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES' - tl
080236 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $554.52 LAB SUPPLIES
080237 A S T M $58.00 PUBLICATION
080238 AMERITECM $177.02 - ' OFFICE SUPPLIES
080239 ANAHEIM BUSINESS MACHINES $168.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
080240 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 910,376.00 EMERGENCY STREET REPAIRS/OIST. 7
980241 ANALABS " ' """'-"" '-"'-'---"$130:00'--'_"--'LAB"SERVICES
m OBC242 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. s138.65 PUMP PARTS
X OB U243 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES GROUP $103.00 TOWEL RENTAL
= 080244 A-PLUS SYSTEMS -' " "' 63.164.20""—""'-' ""'_'- "CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING - � 1
'-+ ABC'245 APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY $26.00 PUBLICATION
.co 080246 AQUA BEN CORP. $3.316,57 ANIONIC POLYMER
--1080247 ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES """ ' "'—""-"--'S2i 705:00'""--"----'—_`-LAB SERVICES
080248 ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY s20.00 PUBLICATION
CO 1180250 A20N CORP. L649-58 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES I
F• OB U2S0 BAN CORPORATION - s93.649.58""-""' "_' """" - SLUDGE DISPOSAL
060251 BSI CONSULTANTS. INC. $2,071.92 ENGINEERING PW-144
080252 BANK OF AMERICA NT s SA $531.04 TRAVEL EXPENSE
P80253 ROBERT BEIN.VILLIAM FROST "" ""' "' -01.778.16—"""—'-"--'ENGINEERING 5-27
080254 BELL PIPE R SUPPLY CO. 1180.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ]
080255 BIERLY L ASSOCIATES. INC. 1550.00 WORKERS COMP. ADMINISTRATION
OBC256 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE ""' $1.010.07'--""""""""""""" "TRUCK PARTS
080257 BOSS MANUFACTURING CO. $172.60 SAFETY SUPPLIES
DOC258 WILLIAM H. BUTLER $563.42 PETTY CASH
PBP259 C 6 R RECONDITIONING CO. $280.00 "- PUMP PARTS
080260 C.F. AIRFREIGHT. INC. $398.33 FREIGHT CHARGES
OSS261 CPT CALIFORNIA. INC. $47.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES
080262 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. $1,388.03 '" LAB SUPPLIES
083263 CALTROL . INC. $224.46 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
08C264 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION AGENCIES $385.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
083265 CALLAHAN, MCHUNE 6 WILLIS LI.636.50 LEGAL SERVICES
080266 CALS CAMERA $405.94 CAMERA
080267 CAPP INC. $330.00 ELECTRIC MOTOR
08026R CARCO, INC. S38.00 TRUCK PARTS
DBC269 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $211.517.40 ENGINEERING PI-20 6 PI-22
080270 CHEMICAL RESEARCH LABS $1,100.00 LAB SERVICES
J
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/22186 PAGE 2 •
REPORT NUMBER AP13
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID u5/28/86
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT "' - -- "-DESCRIPTION
080271 CHEKYEST INC. $10.95 PUMP PART$
080272 CHEMWEST INDUSTRIES. INC. 3339155.R5 FERRIC CHLORIDE
080273 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $17,416.69 GASOLINE/OIL
COL274 CHEVRON USA, INC. S19.12
080275 CLARK BYE HARDWARE $112.51 -- " --- - 6ASQLINE ._ _..
080276 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY S250.00 TOOLS
080277 COMPASS LANDSCAPE S1.911.52 TRAVEL INSURANCE •.:
980278 COMPUTER WAVE $76.80 - - - . LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE r.
08C279 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $2.915.42 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIR
080280 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $87.67 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
C80281 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS ----396.90 -----......FREIGHT CHARGES-
,
BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTION
1902B2, CONTROL CABLES, INC. 846.16 TRUCK PARTS
OBU284 CONTROL DATA CORPORATION $6$852.00 ,. INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
O8u289 CON TRDLCO -_ ' ,682.90 ' " __.. _ ._
080286 CR.A E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL $1$471.90
LAB SUPPLIES
080287 CAL WATER 3471.91 EQUIPMENT RENTAL .i
OB C28T CULL IGAN PATER CONDITIONING " ' '- "--'-' --'f7T:20-____--HATE R.SOETENFR 8ENT8L____ .. -_. . . . . _...
080288 CURRIE GRAPHICS $194.30 WATER SOFTENER EQUIPMENT REPAIR
OPERATIONS SUPPLIES .� 1
fTl 080290 STATE OF ATE WATER 3160.00 ,___ __._PRQCESSI NG FEE/ANNEEATI ON.NO. 63/DIST..F2
X 980290 CALIF. STATE WATER RESOURCES' "" "'324-.00
080291 THE D.M.Y. GROUP. INC. $2.364.80 MAILING LABELS '
DATA PROCESSING SERVICES/PARCEL BILLING FILES
bU 08C292 DANIELS TIRE SCRVICE. $
$38i 27 TRUCK.PARTS
080293 DIGITAL E AS EQUIPMENT
S - --'--""_ " 182.06'-- PRINTING I �. .090295 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $468.72 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR I
C1] 080295 DISCO PRINT COMPANY 3968.72 PRINTING � I .
1 080296 DRESSELHAUS COMPUTER PRODUCTS - -'-"'- -$86.25' ""--" -- - . '----
OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR
fJ 08C297 DRIVER TESTING SERVICE 842.66 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL EXAM +l
CSV299 DUMAS DIESEL INJECTION SB42.66 ENGINE PARTS _.... .
' CS P299 CAL CORP. _ _. ..... . ._ .. ___._-'3208:D0--_.___-.-__ ..... ._.... . '
0803DO E.O.A.W.. INC. 9 K.P LINDSTROM $3,856.03 LAB SUPPLIES
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES-EIS/EIR
080302 WASTER EA OS 3130.32 DEFERRED COMP, DISTRIBUTION
080302 EBERHARD INC. - """ t1$656.32 .._._... _.._. ..._.-..... _
080303 ENCHANTD EQUIPMENT .500.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES
080305 ENCHANTER, INC. $3$716.95 TRUCK PARTS 1
08CS06 ENGINEERING-SCIENCE -" - S716.95 ---" '-"-"--- --.00EAN MONITORING
CBG307 MARSH 3622.46 ENGINEERING PI-25 -
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
080308 FEDERAL
FAIRRES $193.08 DEFERRED CORP. DISTRIBUTION
080309 FISCHER EMPRESS CORP. - 3193.09 - ' ""' - -DELIVERY SERVICE
0SU310 FISHER 6 PORTER CO. 36$135.29 CHLORINATION EQUIPMENT
080311 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 1117.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES
080312 FLEXIBLE O-SYST SYSTEMS 3927.61 "- " -'- -
080312 FLO-SYSTEMS 66,692.56 PIPE SUPPLIES
080313 FLOYD CONSTRUCTION CO. f1$4.127.91 POMP PARTS
080315 FOUNTAIN A. FORKEBT $2.214.5 SURVEY
PW-144
SURVEY LAUNDER HALLS/PRIMARY BASINS
08C315 FOUNTAIN VALLEY TRANSMISSION
11,182.80 PAINT SUPPLIES
080316 FOUNTAIN VALLEY TRANSMISSION EL 182.B0 TRUCK PARTS
FUND NO ( - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING DATE 5/22/86 PAGE 3 +
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/86
WARRAN7 NO. VENDOR AMOUNT - - - - DESCRIP71ON
080317 THE FOXBORO COMPANY $494.70 INSTRUMENTAITON SUPPLIES
DUC318 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $1.021.84 - EQUIPMENT PARTS it
080319 FRUEHAUF DIVISION $136.85 TRUCK PARTS Il
COU320 GEC AUTOMATION PROJECTS. INC. $889.99 PUMP PARTS
080321 GFS CHEMICALS $110.16' LAB SUPPLIES
080322 GUN COMPANY $62.01 TRUCK PARTS
086323 GAS CHEN PRODUCTS . INC. f2011.20 WOOD SHAVINGS
C80324 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. i129.48 - - ELECTRIC MOTOR
OBC325 GENERAL SEAL COMPANY f1.055.23 PUMP PARTS
080326 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $2,108.13 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES
OSC327 GIEHLICH-MITCHELL. INC. -- -- -- f47.48 ----._._. .. -._ FREIGHT CHARGES• -------- - - -
080328 HALPRIN SUPPLY CO. $426.57 SAFETY SUPPLIES
089329 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $270.46 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
080330 NARRISONS f CROSSFIELO PACIFIC S120.84 "" -----'- - "- LAB SUPPLIES
080332 C.G. HELLEA.S SON. INC. f559.97 TOOLS
080332 JOHN C. HENBERGER CO.. INC. f65.71 FREIGHT CHARGES
080333 Y.C. HENDRIE'f CO.. INC. -- - - -' ----9123:30- -RUBBER PRODUCTS __ .._ _.- ._..._. _ . .. ...
080334 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $34.98 WATER USAGE
m 080335 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $142.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES I �
>S 080336 ICC INSTRUMENT -`-- $73.07--"--`---'-- -INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
080337 17 CORP. S1.582.00 LAB SERVICES
I= POC336 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.220.72 HARDWARE
H 339 INVENTORY
MANAGEMENT CORP. --'-- . .00 -'E STING-FIKEO-A ASSET SYSTEM
0O20340 GLENN R. JAMESON $1.625.00 ENGINEERING PI-28 f PI-16
0 080341 THE JANiT0R�3 SHOPPE -
5349.01 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES � •''•
080342 KAYAN BEARINGS I SUPPLY - -- ------f1.796.99"---------- ' --'BEARINGS/ENGINE PARTS -
W 080343 NAY-RAY♦ INC. S102.71 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
080344 KEENAN SUPPLY $929.92 VALVES
080345 KIEWIT P4CIFIC CO. -- - -------f310-.625.74 -CONTRACTOR PW-134,-J.6-26-PW-061R-2 -
000346 KING BEARING. INC. $1.658.04 BEARINGS
060347 DONALD E. KINNEY $790.04 DEFERRED COMP. DISTRIBUTION
r•
080348 K1RST PUMP 0 MACHINE WORKS "-'$10 483.40-------"- "'-"-PUMP - - - -- -
080349 L L N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO f4.437.36 UNIFORM RENTAL
080350 L.R.Y.S.. INC. $5.51 WELDING SUPPLIES
080351 L16NTING DISTRIBUTORS. INC. '-.S1,412.36-'-'----"""--ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -- -' -
080352 LILLY TYPESETTING $63.60 PRINTING
000353 LORAIN PRODUCTS $947.42 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
080354 LOS ANGELFS TIMES S1.U21.41 "' -' - -CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING
080355 LUSTRE-CAL $236.15 SAFETY SUPPLIES
680356 LYCO TRANSPORTATION CO. $21.37 FREIGHT CHARGES
080357 P.J. LYNCH CO. $665.83 '-'- -- - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
080358 MAJOR LOCK SUPPLY 5194.36 SECURITY SUPPLIES I
080359 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION. INC. $594,770.60 CONTRACTOR PI-21 6 PI-22
080360 MARYAC ELECTRONICS 5105.95 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
080361 MATLACK, INC. 347.64 FREIGHT CHARGES
086362 MATT - CHLOR. INC. $424.42 CHLORINATION EQUIPMENT '
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5122/86 PAGE 4 +
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY' - "- - -- '
CLAIMS PAID J5/28/86
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT - -' -' - --- - DESCRIPTION- --' -'-'- '-'- - - -
OBU363 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER S6.00 WATER USAGE '
060364 MICROSENVE INC. $216.34 "'- OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR' -
080365 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $1.802.32 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
080366 MONO GROUP. INC. $4,479.14 PUMP PARTS
080367 J. ARTHUR MOORE, CA. INC. - - 1318:39 -- - -- _.._.__...._.. INSTRUMENTATION-'EQUI PNENT "' -
08036E MOTOROLA♦ INC. $829.17 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
080369 MUNCIE POWER PRODUCTS S257.01 TRUCK PARTS
080370 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL - -. 145.10 " ' - '-'-' SEMINAR REGISTRA71Oq - - - - -
48f371 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $0.29 WATER USAGE
080372 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. $32.694.62 BULK CHLORINE
080373 POPERY J. OOTEN -$231/60 -"---'_----
'EMPLOYEE TRAVEL EKPENSC""" "--
080374 ORANGE COAST HARDWOOD $841.62 LUMBER
080375 GRANGE COUNTY PUMP CO. S93.2B PUMP PARTS 080376 ORANGE VALVE. 6 FITTING CO. -'-"'-"'1651.BY-"---'- - ----------- INSTRUMENTATION_SUPPLIES'
080377 ORITEM CORP S856.42 SPROCKETS
080378 DEANNE OVERVOLO $303.85 VEHICLE DAMAGE CLAIM
080379 OXYGEN SERVICE -"--'-' -" ---------S68B:-09 OXYGEN --"" -"-------'"'---- -'
080380 COUNTY OF ORANGE $497.70 LAB SERVICES
fYl
980381 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $5,839.45 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP.- 5 INSURANCE FUND II
X 080382 PPG INDUSTRIES. INC. "' "' ""--" 134.63----- --"
_ _--..._PAINT SUPPLIES._. . _... -I. . . -_
�-+ 089383 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 5516.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES
w 080384 PACIFIC BELL 9625.48 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES _
�4 890385 ROY PENOERGRAFT - - - -'-'-- -' --"---`- -5490-'OR- --{ VIDEORECORDE 'OIST0.7 BUT E01✓- - "-
080386 PHOTO 8 SOUND CO. $2 A13.95 i '
W 080387 PLENUM PUBLISHING CORP. $58.50 VIDEO RECORDER
r O038R XAROLD PRIMROSE ICE - "' - - - -_"--- 530.00----- "--STEEICE-L SUBSCRIPTION
GBBC3B9 PROGRESSIVE STEEL SUPPLY $66.29
080390, PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY S2.797.00 FENCE INSTALLATION 1 '
080391 RE-CY-MLEEN CORP. - - -- - -.._.._...__.._5325:42 COMPRESSOR--_..__-_-_____- -
080392 RED HILL STATIONERS $57.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES ' I
089393 THE REGISTER $1.377.52 LEGAL ADVERTISING
080394 REMEDY TEMP ' - - - -- -'-'- $649-60'---------- TEMPORARY SERVICES -
080395 THE REPUBLIC -SUPPLY CO. 510.08 PIPE SUPPLIES
083396 RICOX CORP 1373.16 COPIER LEASE ��
OOL397 ROBBINS L MYERS INC. "- ""-" $5.299.66'-- _-"-- PUMP PARTS - --- - -
080398 JOSEPH T. RYERSON S SON. INC. S738.40
STEEL
089399 SANDE EQUIPMENT CO. S312.70
080400 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $65.79 . .. _ EQUIPMENT PARTS
- ANNUAL
SUPPLIES
080401 SANTI AK1 RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION AGENCY S1.401.00 I
080402 SCHAEFER DIXON ASSOCIATES $1,005.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP OVES
SOILS TESTING
080903 SEARS, POEPUCN 8 CO. - 3196.98 '-'--' TOOLS
080404 SEARS. ROEBUCK AND CO. $38.46 LAB SUPPLIES
C80495 SHEET METAL INOUSTRI $50.00 PUBLICATION
080406 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $15.32 " " TRUCK PARTS
OBU497 SMITH-FKERY CO. 1288.0V CONCRETE TESTING
080408 SMITH PIPE L SUPPLY, INC $417.49 PIPE SUPPLIES
FUND NO ( I - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING DATE 5/22/86 PAGE 5 ,
REFORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICYS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID D5/28/86
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT -'--' -" -'- -' - DESCRIPTION - I'
OBA489 SOUTH COAST OOOGF S315.94 TRUCK PARTS
080410 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. s324.243.24 -- " POWER -
080011 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $24.865.66 NATURAL GAS
080412 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $3.692.66 DIESEL FUEL
080413 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER - $1.087.47 -'- - -- - --"'-` -BOTTLED WATER - - -
080414 STAR 700L 3 SUPPLY CO. $1.343.37 TOOLS ^�I'
G80415 STERLING CPTICAL 1241.00 _ _ ___ _ SAFETY SUPPLIES_
-- - ADJUST NANNOLE FRAMES/DIST. 2
080016 SULLY MILLER CONTRACTING CO. $1.728.00 "- - -
OBU41T SUMMIT STEEL 5$91.98 STEEL PIPE
081419 SUNSET FORD 853.96 _ _ __TRUCK PARTS
083919 THE SUPPLIERS - -- -- '--- 51.053.96'---' --- -
SAFETY SUPPLIES
080421 TRANSAMER. INC. 3285.90 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR I '-
08042I TRANSAMERICA OELAVAL $73.79 ENGINE PARTS - I '
084422 TRI NSNEp101AN CHEMICALS. INC. - -----32.904.51-_---_-- ----'CAUSTIC SODA
080423 TRAVEL TRAVEL s140.00 AIR FARE
080424 TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $1.944.76 TRUCK PARTS _
C60425 J.G. TUCKER 9 SON. INC. - '-----------3367.68 --- --- '- --- -- -� '
(RUCK PARTATION SUPPLIES
DBV427 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTER.ENC. S235.32 TRUCK PARTS
X 080428 THE UNI SOURCE CORP. E2.014.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES jI
= 080928 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE - -- ---- -- -' ----T142.53— ----DELIVERY SERVICE- -- -- �' - - - - - --
080429 UNIVERSAL HACK $339.21 TRUCK PARTS
to OBC438 V.O.C. TESTING 31000.00 DIGESTER GAS TESTING
- OB043I VUR SCIENTIFIC - - - -'--------------12'.897.Y8- LAB SUPPLIES- ----------- - --- - -- -
G8C432 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. S6.996.81 VALVE/PIPE SUPPLIES
to 080433 VAREC. INC. $1.107.70 MECRAN ICAL SUPPLIES � }
O BP454 - WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTFR- - ---- -- -- --347.55- ENGINE PARTS
'- - -
--'---
080435 WESTATES CARBON. INC. 9726.10
VQUIPMENTBER
RE
080437 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. $640.60 EQUIPMENT RENTAL '
- - 081438 - ROURKEWILSON•S EQUIPMENWOODRUFF PEN TALS.INC---'-- S5YJ:00 - -- .-- --- ---' i
WSGAL S RVICER-DIST. 7
080438 ROUOKE E WOODRUFF 320.225.90 LEGAL SERVICES
084E CORP. E431.60 COPIER LEASE 1 �
- ' -000940 90 ' - GEORGORGE TAPDLFY ASSOCIATES - -- - --- -- - --"---S285 E97-'-- - 'VALVE. -.
080441 BOB YOUNG ROOFING $7.585.00 KERDOF LAB-PLT.I
080442 27EBARTH AND ALPER S295.708.14 CONTRACTOR P2-28-1 -
080443 CAROL H. KAWAKAMI - - - -- - - - - - 3998.80-------- DIRECTORS COMP. S MILEAGE - - - -
080094 RUTHELYN PLUMMER $233.82 DIRECTORS COMP. 6 MILEAGE
08 S445 ROGER R. STANTON $206.72 DIRECTORS COMP. 3 MILEAGE
-----------------
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/28/86 $2.856.262.39
i
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/22/86 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/86
SUMMARY AMOUNT
- . .A1 OPER FUND $ 1 ,313.20
02 OPER FUND 3,407.69
02 ACO FUND 512.12
03 OPER FUND "13.652:09.._.__.. _...__.._.___...._. _.... ._..__._...._._. ... . _ ..
03 ACO FUND 9,635.00
05 OPEN FUND 6,825.32 P ! "'
05 ACO FUND - ' 1 ,778.18. . ____.... .._.. .......... .. .....__.... .._ . ..
07 OPER FUND 4.726.39
!7 F/R FUND 93,D34.86
011 OPER FUND _. ..__ ...__ .. ___.__912.40'-----_...._._ _...._.__._______._...__ ....
E14 ACO FUND 833.50
l566 OPER FUND 2,881.48
/697 OPEN FUND .. .. -- - 38.89.._._.-_.__..._..-.,_.___... . . . _.._.. .._ . .. ..._
JT OPER FUND 630.423.68
CORP 2,010,432.11
- ---SELF FUNDED WORKERS CORP. INSURANCE FUND --""-"' ---..5937
JT WORKING CAPITAL 66,264.20
_X
ti TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/28/66 $2,856,262.39
<'
CA
�f.Y
{
I
1 I.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
June 18, 1986 - 6:30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of June 11, 1986, the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California met in an
adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' Administrative
Offices.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. The roll was called and
the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT: Richard Buck, Chairman pro tem, Todd
Murphy, James Neal, Carrey Nelson,
Chris Norby, Bob Perry, Don Roth, Don
Smith, Dorothy Wedel
DIRECTORS ABSENT: Dan Griset, Carol Eawanami, Roger Stanton
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Thomas M. Dawes, William H. Butler,
Rita J. Brown, Gary Streed
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Director Don Griffin, Director Peer Swan,
Lora Stovall, Ed Long, Alan Watts
Report, discussion and actions Chairman pro tem Buck reported that the
re long-term debt financing for purpose of this adjourned meeting was to
funding capital construction review and give further consideration to
projects the alternative of partially funding the
District's long-term capital construction
program needs by issuance of tax-exempt certificates of participation, as
discussed at the regular meeting of the Board on June 11.
The Director of Finance then reviewed the five and ten-year fiscal projections of
the District based upon two sets of assumptions for the Joint Works Master Plan
sewerage facilities construction program requirements and the supplemental
financial information which had been provided to the Directors. He also reviewed
the alternative financing methods for funding District operations as well as the
capital expansion program, including ad valorem taxes, user and connection fees,
federal and state construction grants, use of existing reserves and long-term
debt financing, the anticipated time frame in which alternative funding sources
would be required to be considered by the Board and the legal and procedural
requirements for implementing the various financing alternatives.
Ms. Lora Stovall of Bartle Wells, Districts' financial consultant, then reviewed
financial projections prepared by her firm reflecting District's fiscal position
with and without issuance of long-term debt securities, and the impact on the.
District's position by issuing debt securities.
06/18/86
The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion on the relative merits of
issuing tax-exempt certificates of participation to partially fund the District's
share of joint works capital construction requirements, including the advantages -and disadvantages of fixed-interest rate versus variable-interest rate securities
and the potential for increased investment returns based upon the spread between
the District's investment earnings on reserve funds and the currently Lower
interest rate for variable rate debt.
It was then moved and seconded that the Board declare its intent not to proceed
at this time with issuance of tax-exempt certificates of participation to
partially fund the District's share of joint works sewage facilities
requirements.
Following further discussion of the District's funding requirements and the
advantages and disadvantages of issuing long-term debt securities at this time
because of the impending sunset of existing federal tax laws that are favorable
for tax-exempt financing, the scheduling required to do so prior to the
September 1st deadline, the use of District's existing construction reserves; and
the source of funds for retiring debt, the vote was polled by roll call and the
Secretary reported that the motion had failed.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the financial consultant, bond counsel and staff be, and are hereby,
directed to proceed with planning and preparation of necessary contracts, legal
opinions, official statements and related documents required to prepare for
issuance of tax-exempt certificates of participation to partially fund the
District's share of joint works sewerage facilities prior to the September 1,
1986 deadline.
It was then moved that the financial consultant and bond counsel be directed to
proceed with planning of issuance of variable interest rate certificates of
participation. The motion failed for lack of a second.
Following further discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of fixed
interest rate versus variable interest rate debt securities, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That the financial consultant and bond counsel be directed to proceed with
planning for issuance of tax-exempt certificates of participation on a fixed
interest rate basis.
Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: -
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2
be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:53 p.m.,
June 18, 1986.
Secretary, Boa d of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 2 of
Orange County, California
-2-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
June 18, 1986 - 8:00 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of June 11, 1986, the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the
Districts' Administrative Offices.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. The roll was called
and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT: Richard Partin, Chairman, Frank Clift,
Norman Culver, Don Griffin, James Neal,
Carrey Nelson, Chris Norby, Richard Polis,
Sal Sapien, Charles Sylvia, Dorothy Wedel,
Dewey Wiles
DIRECTORS ABSENT: Ruth Bailey, Dan Griset, Don Roth,
Roger Stanton
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Thomas M. Dawes, William R. Butler,
Rita J. Brown, Gary Streed
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Director Peer Swan, Lora Stovall, Ed
Long, Alan Watts
x rt ,r ,rr r. :rne � � � •
Report, discussion and activities Chairman Partin reported that the purpose
re long-term debt financing for of this adjourned meeting was to give
funding capital construction further consideration to the alternative
projects of partially funding the District's
long-term capital construction program
needs by issuance of tax-exempt certificates of participation, as discussed at
the regular meeting of the Board on June 11.
The Director of Finance then reviewed the five and ten-year fiscal projections of
the District based upon two seta of assumptions for the Joint Works Master Plan
sewerage facilities construction program requirements of the District, and the
supplemental financial information which had been provided to the Directors. He
also reviewed the alternative financing methods for funding District operations
as well as the capital expansion program, including ad valorem taxes, user and
connection fees, federal and state construction grants and long-term debt
financing, the anticipated time frame in which alternative funding sources would
be required to be considered by the Board and the legal and procedural
requirements for implementing the various financing alternatives.
Ms. Lora Stovall of Bartle Wells, Districts' financial consultant, then reviewed
financial projections prepared by her firm reflecting the District's fiscal
position with and without issuance of long-term debt securities and the impact on
the District's position by issuing debt securities.
06/18/86
In response to a question from the Board, staff reviewed the sewerage facilities
projects proposed to be partially financed by issuance of certificates of
participation pursuant to the approved Joint Works Master Plan and the existing
provisions of federal law, and also commented on the comparative financial
position of District 3 relative to other Sanitation Districts.
The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion of all the alternative means of
funding both the District's short-term and long-term operating and capital
requirements including ad valorem taxes, connection and user fees, grants, use of
current reserves and debt financing, and the Board's historical fiscal policies.
With respect to fees, the Board also discussed the legal and procedural
rquirements and limitations of the various alternatives and the potential fee
amounts that would be necessary to fund the needs by this alternative.
The Board also discussed at considerable length the relative merits of issuing
tax-exempt certificates of participation to partially fund the District's share
of joint works capital construction requirements, including the advantages and
disadvantages of fixed interest rate versus variable interest rate securities and
the potential for increased investment returns based upon the spread between the
District's investment earnings on reserves and the currently lover interest rate
for variable rate debt.
It was then moved and seconded that the financial consultant, bond counsel and
staff be directed to proceed with planning and preparation of necessary
_ contracts, legal opinions, official statements and related documents required to
prepare for issuance of tax-exempt certificates of participation to partially
fund the District's share of joint works sewerage facilities prior to the
September 1, 1986 deadline.
A substitute motion was then offered to consider the implementation of user fees.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
Following a call for the question on the original motion, the vote was polled and
the Secretary reported that the motion had passed.
Director Norby requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a
matter of record.
It was then moved and seconded that the financial consultant and bond counsel be
directed to proceed with planning for issuance of tax-exempt certificates of
participation on a fixed interest rate basis.
Following further discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of
fixed-interest rate versus variable-interest rate debt financing, the vote was
polled and the Secretary reported that the motion had passed.
Director Norby requested that his abstention from voting on the motion be made a
matter of record.
Adiournment Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3
be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:27 p.m. ,
June 18, 1986.
Secretary, Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 3 of
Orange County, California
-2-
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Goss Of ico Box 8I27
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Taleahaxs:
Aa Coda 714
JOINT BOARDS 9140-290
62-241
n 11
AGENDA
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
JULY 9, 1986 - 7: 30 P.M.
DISTRICT 14
(5) (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept
resignation of Mayor James Beam of the City of
Orange from the Board of District No. 14, and
�./ seating first and second alternates to the mayor,
as follows:
District First Alternate Second Alternate
14 Don E. Smith Gene Beyer
� Rw ►9i d o7-f 14
STRINGFELLOW
UPDATE
PUBLISHED BY THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL DIVISION, STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
JUNEMULY 1966
RUFS Action Plan
DHS, EPA officials clarify agency roles
To more efficiently manage completion of the Stringfellow The team is led by Ted Rauh, Stringfellow Project Manager,
Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study(RI/FS)project,a a management specialist who has served on the state Energy
cooperative action plan has been developed by state and fed- Commission as chief of the Conservation and Energy Facility
eral officials. Representatives from the state Department of Siting Division. Most recently, Rauh has served as a senior
Health Services(DHS)and the U.S. Environmental Protection staff member to Governor Deukmejian's Task force on Toxics,
Agency(EPA)outlined plan details at the April 16 Stringfellow Waste, and Technology.
Advisory Committee meeting in Glen Avon. The staff also includes five technical project officers, three
According to Dave Willis, deputy director of the DHS tonics people working on financial and contractual activities associ-
program, the "Stringfellow Action Plan" enables the state to ated with the site, a community relations staff member, an at-
accelerate various tasks of the RI/FS,the study to identify and torney to handle legal matters, and clerical support staff. One
evaluate clean-up alternatives for final site closure. DHS has of the technical project officers will be located in the Riverside
retained control over the clean-up study and expanded its office of SAIC, the slate's contractor for the PUPS.
technical and contracting team. Both agencies are developing To help address community concerns,a DHS staff member
comprehensive schedule to track project progress. In add!- will visit the Stringfellow Community Information Center in
"eatealion, the state will provide funds for completing this phase of Glen Avon once a week to discuss clean-up study progress
the project,which is expected to be finished by mid-1987. with area residents.
The DHS Stringfellow Project Team is made up of 11 full- When the plan took effect in April, responsibilities of each
time employees devoting 100 percent of their time to the pro- agency were clearly defined. While the state will retain techni-
ject, Willis said. The team was modified to improve DHS cal, administrative, and financial control for the remainder of
capabilities for approving project worliplans, and to provide the RI/FS, paying costs with state money, EPA will be closely
additional resources to address numerous support issues. involved on all technical aspects of the project.
"Although we (EPA) are now out of the administrative-
financial loop, which I actually think will save some time, EPA
DHS-Toxic Substances Control Division and DHS have agreed to reach consensus on all technical
Stringfellow Site Management Team decisions that need to be made;' said Keith Takata, EPA re-
gional chief of Supenund programs.
e6i.r G.p,,,v oi..nor
N.CUNNINGHAM
Community esletipm �"'�+
6.6HEe .ft-
16161330-0]66 prnle<t Meneper fix,mery � ` �
T,flRUH 6,NAMILLTON
Te<M1ninl Unit LpN Can-, RtlminbveMe Unit
a.MFPLIN
- wl
Wane Manage— spe<inin Ms per -
J,MEYEa LCFSPLEOOIO �ae
Wnu Ma 8.1 Sspacielin . �<
s.JINE$ J.LEWISLEW1 Y
EnpiLO ENDER
M. Ahearn, L
ORLLOWAV C.HENOEflsON _ '�
Ergirn Clatlnl
Xlrlry 7t
Atrium Rnairg 6.MONTER,%time
C.VALIZAN,%.,I.. A tour of the Stringfellow Site and the pretreatment plant was con.
6,flANMAN
E7AE ducted by project officials or the California League of Kbmen Voters
in April.
DHS officials at Stringfellow information center weekly
To help address community concerns regarding the String- The SAC is made up of community participants,elected rep-
fellow Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RIIFS) resentatives, and state and federal officials,that review projei
project, an official from the state Department of Health Saw- progress, provide guidance, and make decisions pertaining` '
ices(DHS)is available at the Stringfellow Community Informa- the RIIFS. Monthly meetings begin i 2:30 p.m., the third
tion Center one day a week. Wednesday of each month. The public is welcome to attend.
A DHS representative is present at the Stringfellow Commu- The Information Center is located at 9007 Mission Blvd., in
nity Information Center to answer questions and provide infor- Glen Avon. The phone number is(714)681-4321.
mation each Friday,with the exception of the third week of the Center Hours
month. During the third week of each month, a state official is 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. —Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday
available on Thursday, the day following the monthly meeting Noon to 4 p.m. —Wednesday
of the Stringfellow Advisory Committee(SAC). Closed—Saturday, Sunday, and Monday
IN
i J
`a
I �
IN
gi
I
_ For information regarding the Stringfermy Site RIIFS project and other
related ap'rvities,please contact:
Sue Sher.Community Relations Coordinator
Office of Public Information and Participation
+ Toxic Substances Control Division
_ Stale Department of Health Services
T417 4 P Street.Sacramento.CA 95814 (916)K2 1789
Glen Avon community leader Penny Newman(above)heads the w/- Sandra Carroll,Community Relations Coordinator
unteer staff at the Stringfellow Community Information Center.At the U.S.Environmental ManagPasecement
on Agency
center(right), Sue Sher, community relations coordinator from the 215 Frand Waste Management Division
ty 215 Fremont Street ,n05
state community of Health Services responds ro a call from a Glen San Francisco,CA 94/0.6 (415)9747538 or toll free(880)2313075
Awn community member.
Published by: FlRsrcLnss
The Office of Public Information and Participation MAIL
Toxic Substances Control Division U.S.POSTAGE
State Department of Health Services PAID
7141744 P Street La Jdla,CA
Sacramento,CA 95814 Permit Na 659
(916)3244789
STRINGFELLOW UPDATE NEWSLETTER
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15 �1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LEGAL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR PROPOSED SALE OF
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
BY DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2,3,5,6 AND 14
DOCUMENT TITLE COLOR CODE
1. Agreement for the Acquisition and Construction of Joint Blue
Facilities
2. Trust Agreement Yellow
3. Assignment Agreement Light Green
4. Official Statement Tan
5. Notice of Intention to Sell Certificates of Participation Salmon
6. Notice Inviting Bids (for) Certificates of Participation Buff
7. Bid for the Purchase of... . .Certificates of Participation Goldenrod
S. Report(s) of Proposed Debt Issuance, California Debt Dark Green
Advisory Commission
graft 6/30/86 #21
#23
AGREEMENT FOR THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF JOINT #26
FACILITIES #(26)
by and among #28
,COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, #31
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, #32
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, #33
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, #34
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, #36
And #38
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #39
gated as of August 1, 1986 #41
#43
TABLE OF CONTENTS #]--�-1
Page # (1271:
] #127 3
Definitions # (1273:
1. 01. Definitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 #1273
11 #1273
Acquisition and Construction of the Project; # (1273
Certificates of Participation # (1273
2.01. Acquisition and Construction of the #1273
Project. . . . 6 # (1273
2.02. Payments of Costs of Acquisition. . . . 6 #1273
2.03. Certificates of Participation. . . . . . 6 #1273
2.04. Deposits under Trust Agreement. . . . . 7 #1273
111 #1273
Installment Payments; Several Obligations # (1273
1.01. Payment of the Installment Payments; #�3
Several Obligations. . . . . . . . . . . 7 # (1273
.1.02. Several Obligations. . . . . . . . 9 #1273
.1.03. Interest on the Installment #1273
Payments. . . . . . . 9 # (1273:
1.04. Payments to Trustee and Paying #1273
Agent. . . . 9 # (1273
3_.05. Additional Security. 9 #1273
IV #1273
Legally Available Monies; Covenant Regarding # (1273
Budget # (1273
q.01. Legally Available Monies. . . . . . 9 #1273
A.02. Allocation of Legally Available #1273
Monies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 # (1273
=i- #lid
TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued #1272
Page # (1272:
Y #1273
Covenants of the Districts # (1273:
5..01. Compliance with Agreement for #1273
Acquisition and Construction. . . . . .11 4 (1273
5..02. Against Encumbrances on Net #1273
Enterprise Revenues. . .12 # (1273
$_.03. Against Sale or Other Disposition of #1273
Property. . . . . . .12 # (1273
5 .04. Against Competitive Facilities. . . . .12 #1273
.a.05. Tax Covenants. . . . . . . . . . . . .13 #1273
5.06 . Prompt Acquisition. . . . . . . . 13 #1273
�j.07. Maintenance and Operation of the 41273
Enterprise; Budgets. . . . . . . . . . . 13 # (1273
5.08. Payment of Claims. . . . . . . . .13 41273
5..09. Compliance with Contracts. . . . . . . .14 #1273
5_.10. Insurance. . . . . . .14 #1273
5..11. Accounting Records; Financial #1273
Statements and Other Reports. . . . .15 # (1273
5.12. Protection of Security and Rights. .16 #1273
�.13. Payment of Taxes and Compliance with 41273
Governmental Regulations. . . . . . . . 16 # (1273
�.. a.14. Amount of Rates and Charges. . . . . . .16 #1273
5.15. Improvements to the Enterprise. . . . .16 #1273
5.16 . Collection of Rates and Charges. . . . .17 #1273
5..17. Eminent Domain Proceeds. . . . . . . . .17 #1273
.a.18. Further Assurances. . . . . . . . . . .18 #1273
YI #1273
Prepayment of Installment Payments # (1273
fa. 01. Prepayment. . . . . . . . . . . 18 #1273
fi.02. Method of Prepayment. . . . . . . . . .19 #1273
YII #1273
Events of Default and Remedies # (1273.
7 . 01. Events of Default and Events of #1273
Mandatory Acceleration; Acceleration # ( 1273
of Maturities. . . . . . . . . .19 # (1273.
7 .02. Application of Funds Upon #1273
Acceleration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 # (1273
=ii- #1268
TABLE OP CONTENTS, Continued #1172
pane #h1-72
1.03. Other Remedies of the Districts or #1273
the Trustee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 # (1273
7 .04. Non-Waiver. . . . . . . . . . .22 #1273
7 .05. Remedies Not Exclusive. . . . . . . . .22 #1273
yIII #1273
Miscellaneous # (1273
g.01. Liability of Each District Limited #1273
to Monies Legally Available. . . . . .23 # (1273
$.02. Benefits of Installment Payment #1273
Contract Limited to Parties. . . .23 # (1273
11.03. Successor Is Deemed Included In All #1273
References to Predecessor. . . . . . . .23 # (1273
$.04. Waiver of Personal Liability. . . . 23 #1273
fl.05. Article and Section Headings, Gender #1273
and References. . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 # (1273
fl•06. Partial Invalidity. . . . . . . . . . .24 #1273
$. 07. Assignment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 #1273
$.08. Net Contract. . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 #1273
2.09. California Law. . . . . . . . . . . . .24 #1173
fl•10. Notices. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 U 3
2.11. Effective Date. . . . . . . . . . . . .25 #1R73
1i.12. Execution in Counterparts. . . . . . . .25 #1273
$.13. Amendments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 #1273
=iii- #1"j
A- Tt .MR.NT FOR TB A DUI ITION AM CONSTRUCTION OF JOINT }
FACILITIES 4 ( 47)
This AGREEMENT FOR THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF #50
JOINT FACILITIES, made and entered into as of August 1, 1986, by and #51
among County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, #52
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, ,County #53 ,54
Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, County #55
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, County #56
Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California and County #57
Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Each consti- #58
tuting a "county sanitation district" duly organized and existing #59
under and by virtue of the laws Qf California, including particularly #60
the County Eanitation District Act (the "Act") of the Health and #61
Safety Code of the State of California (singularly, a "District, " #62
collectively, ,the "Districts") ; #63
WITNESSETH: #65
kZHEREAS, the Districts are authorized by Section 4843 of #67
the Act to jointly acquire and construct sewers, works, or facilities #68
for the handling, treatment or disposal of sewage or industrial #69
waste; and # (69)
KHEREAS, the Board of Directors of each District has deter- #70
mined that it is in the hest interests of each such District to con- #71
tract with the other Districts for the joint construction and acqui- #72
sition of or improvements to iZertain sewers, works and facilities for #73
the handling, treatment and disposal of sewage and industrial waste #74
from each such District and that each such District pay for the costs #75,76
of such acquisition and construction in the manner described herein; #77
and # (77)
yjHEREAS, all acts, conditions and things required by law to #78,79
exist, to have happened and to have been performed precedent to and #80
in connection with the execution and Entering into of this Agreement #81
for the Acquisition and Construction of Joint Facilities ithe #82,83
"Agreement for Acquisition and Construction") do exist, have happened #84
and have been performed in regular and due time, form and manner as #85,86
required by law, and the parties hereto are now duly authorized to #87
execute and enter into the Agreement for Acquisition and # ( 87)
Construction; # ( 87)
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PREMISES AND OF THE #88,89
MUTUAL AGREEMENTS AND COVENANTS CONTAINED HEREIN AND FOR OTHER VALU- #90
ABLE CONSIDERATION, THE PARTIES HERETO DO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: #91
94948.1.2704.05: 1 #18
ARTICLE I #92
DEFINITIONS # M[)
SECTION 1.01, Definitions. Unless the context otherwise #94
requires, the terms defined in this Section 1.01 shall for all pur- #95
poses hereof and of any amendment hereof and of any opinion or report #96
or other document mentioned herein or therein have the meanings #97 ,98
defined herein, the following definitions to be equally applicable to #99
both the singular and plural forms of any of the terms .defined #100,1
herein. All capitalized terms used in this Agreement for Acquisition #102
and Construction and not defined herein shall have the meaning #103
ascribed thereto in the Trust Agreement. # (103)
Accountant's ReBort #105
"Accountant ' s Report " means a report signed by an # (105)
Independent Certified Public Accountant. #106
Acquisition. Acquire or Acquired #108
"Acquisition", "Acquire" or "Acquired" means the acquisi- # (108)
tion and construction of an ownership interest in or a capacity right #109
in or right to use the Project, or the construction and ownership of #110
the Project. # (110)
Acquisition Fund Deposit #112
"Acquisition Fund Deposit" means, with respect to each # t`r12)
District, the amount set forth as its Acquisition Fund Deposit in #113
Appendix A hereto. # (113)
Date of Operation #115
"Date of Operation" means, with respect to the project, the #116
date estimated by the Independent Engineer by which the Project will #117
have been Acquired and will be ready for continuous, reliable opera- #118
tion by the Districts. # (118)
Engineer's Report #120
"Engineer 's Report" means a report signed by an Independent # (120)
Engineer. # (120)
Enterprise #122
"Enterprise" means the entire sanitary sewerage enterprise # (122)
of each District, including the Project, including its ownership #123
interest pursuant to the Joint Agreement, and further including all #124
_2- #19
94948.1. 2704.05: 1 #
real and Rersonal property, or any interest therein constituting a #125
part thereof and all additions and improvements thereto whether now #126
existing or hereafter acquired, constructed or installed. #127
Event of Default #129
"Event of Default" means an event of default described in #130
Section 7 .01. # (130)
Fiscal Year #132
"Fiscal Year" means the twelve calendar month period .fermi- #133
nating on June 30 of each year, or any other annual accounting period #134
hereafter selected and designated by each District as its Fiscal Year #135
in accordance with applicable law. # (135)
Funded Interest Deposit #137
"Funded Interest Deposit" means with respect to each # (137)
District, the amount set forth as its Funded Interest Deposit in #138
Appendix A hereto. # (138)
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles #140
"General Accepted Accounting Principles" means the uniform #141
accounting and reporting procedures set forth in publications of the #142
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants or its successor #143
and the National Council on Governmental Accounting or its successor, #144
or by any other generally accepted authority on such procedures, and #145
includes, as applicable, the standards set forth by the financial #146 ,1
Accounting Standards Board or its successor. # (147)
Gross Revenues #149
"Gross Revenues" means all gross income and revenue # (149)
received or Leceivable by each District from the ownership or opera- #150
tion of its Enterprise, determined in accordance with Generally #151
Accepted Accounting Principles, including all rates and charges #152
received by such District for the services of its Enterprise and all #153
proceeds of insurance covering business interruption loss relating to #154
the Enterprise and all other money howsoever derived by such District #155
from the ownership or operation of its Enterprise or arising from its #156
Enterprise, but excluding refundable deposits made to establish #157
credit and advances or contributions in aid of gonstruction and line #158
extension fees. # (158)
-3- #19
94948.1. 2704.05: 1 # (19)
Independent Certified Public Accountant #1F^
"Independent Certified Public Accountant" means any firm of #1�67
certified public accountants duly licensed and entitled to practice #162
and practicing as such under the laws of the State of California, #163
appointed and paid by the Districts, and each of whom -- #164
I. is in fact independent and not under the domina- #166
tion gf the Districts; #167
Z. does not have a substantial financial interest, #169
direct or indirect, in the operations of the Districts; and #170
1.. is not connected with the Districts as an officer #172
or employee of the Districts, but may be regularly retained #173
to audit the accounting records of and make reports thereon #174,1'
to the Districts. # (175)
Independent Engineer #177
"Independent Engineer" means any registered engineer or #178
firm of engineers of national reputation generally recognized to be #179
well qualified in engineering matters relating to sewage systems, #180
appointed and paid by the Districts, and who or each of whom -- #181
I. is in fact independent and not under the domina- #183
tion of the Districts; # ( "3)
Z. does not have a substantial financial interest, #1'r�
direct or indirect, in the operation of the Districts; and #186
1• is not connected with the Districts as an officer #188
or employee of the Districts, but may be regularly retained #189
to make reports to the Districts. #190
Installment Payment Account #192
"Installment Payment Account" means a separate account for # (192)
each District established and held by the Trustee in the Installment #193
Payment Fund. 4 (193)
Installment Payment Date #195
" Installment Payment Date" means any date on which # (195)
Installment Payments are scheduled to be paid by the Districts under #196 ,l
and pursuant hereto. # (197)
-4- #19
94948.1 . 2704.05: 1
Installment Payment Fund #199
"Installment Payment Fund" means the fund by that name # (199)
.established by Section 4.02 which contains therein the Installment #200
Payment Account of each District. # (200)
Installment Payments #202
" Installment Payments" means, with respect to each # ( 202)
District, the installment payments set forth with respect to it in #203
Appendix A hereto. #204
Joint Agreement #206
"Joint Agreement" means the Agreement, effective as of # (206)
July 1 , 1985, pursuant to which the County Sanitation Districts of #207
Orange County maintain a centralized and joint administrative #208
organization. # (208)
Joint Facilities #210
"Joint Facilities" means, at any given time, the trunk #211
sewers, real property, improvements to real property, treatment plant #212
facilities, personal property, and all appurtenant sewage facilities #213
jointly-owned by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, #214
California. # (214)
Maintenance and Operation Costs of the Enterprise #216
"Maintenance and Operation Costs of the Enterprise" means #217
the costs paid or incurred by each District for maintaining and oper- #218
ating its Enterprise, determined in accordance with Generally #219
Accepted Accounting Principles, including all expenses necessary to #220,2
maintain and preserve the Enterprise in good repair and working #222 ,2
order, and including all administrative costs of such District that #224
are charged directly or apportioned to the pperation of the #225
Enterprise, such as salaries and wages p£ employees, overhead, taxes #226
(if any) and insurance premiums, and including all other reasonable 4227
and necessary posts of such District or charges required to be paid #228,2
by it to Qomply with the terms hereof fees and expenses of #230,2
Independent Certified Public Accountants and Independent Engineers; #232
but excluding in all gases depreciation, replacement and obsolescence #233
charges or reserves therefor and amortization of intangibles. #234
Net Enterprise Revenues #236
"Net Enterprise Revenues" means for each District the Gross # (236)
Revenues less the Maintenance and Operation Costs of its Enterprise. #237 , 2
-5- #19
94948.1.2704.05: 1 # (19)
Net Proceeds #1
"Net Proceeds" means, when used with respect to any insur- #24141
ance or condemnation award, the proceeds from such insurance or con- #242
demnation award remaining after payment of all expenses (including #243
attorneys ' fees) incurred in the collection of such proceeds. #244
Principal Payment Date #246
"Principal Payment Date" means (beginning in 1987) the #247
first Business Day in August of each year. # (247)
Project #249
"Project" means the works and facilities to be Acquired # ( 249)
with proceeds Qf the Certificates as described in Appendix B hereto. #250
Reserve Requirement #252
"Reserve Requirement" means, with respect to each District, # (252)
the amount set forth as the Reserve Requirement in Appendix A #253
hereto. # (253)
Sewer Service #255
"Sewer Service" means the sewer service provided by each # (255)
District. # ' 5)
ARTICLE II #256
ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT; #(256)
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION #(256)
SECTION 2.01. Acquisition and Construction of the Project. #258
Each District hereby agrees with each other District to Acquire the # (258)
Project. # (258)
SECTION 2.02. Payments of Costs of Acquisition. Each #260
District hereby agrees with each other District to pay such # (260)
District's share of costs of Acquisition of the Project by making the #261
Installment payments and other payments to be made by it hereunder. #262
AUCTION 2.03. Certificates of Participation. As provided #264
in Section _, each District will assign to the Trustee such #(264)
District's rights to the payments to be made hereunder by each other #265
District. The Trustee will, as provided in the Trust Agreement, #266
deliver the Certificates, aach of which will evidence a direct and #267
proportionate share of the payments to be made by each District #268
-6- #19
94948.1.2704.05: 1 # hr17
pursuant to Section _ Moneys derived from the delivery of the #269
Certificates shall be held and disposed of in accordance with the #270
Trust Agreement . Payment of the costs and expenses of the #271
Acquisition of the Project, including incidental expenses, shall be #272
from money deposited with the Trustee it the principal corporate #273
trust office of the Trustee, with such payments to be made solely #274
upon requisitions therefor filed with the Trustee by the Districts as #275
set forth in Section 3.03 of the Trust Agreement. #276
SECTION 2.04. Deposits under Trust Agreement. Each #278
District hereby agrees that upon the effective date hereof there #279
shall be deposited with the Trustee: (a) the amount of such #(279)
District's Acquisition Fund Deposit for the purpose of making payment #280
of the costs of Acquiring the Project; (b) the amount of such #281
District's Funded Interest Deposit, for payment of capitalized inter- #282
est from its Installment Payment Account in the Installment Payment #283
Fund; and (c) the amount of such District's Reserve Requirement, for #(283)
deposit in such District's Reserve Account in the Debt Service 4(283)
Reserve Fund. # (283)
ARTICLE III #284
INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS; SEVERAL OBLIGATIONS #(284)
SECTION 3.01. Payment of the Installment Payments; Several #286
Obligations. Each District hereby agrees with each other District to # (286)
pay its Installment payments, in the amounts and at the times pro- #287
vided for herein. The total aggregate amount of the Installment #288
Payments to be paid by the Districts hereunder for the Acquisition of #289,2
the Project is the aggregate principal amount of million #291
dollars ($ ) . # (291)
Each District ' s obligation is payable solely from any #292,2
source of legally available funds of each such District, as described #(294)
herein. Each District hereby acknowledges and agrees that its obli- #295
gation to the other Districts to make payments of its Installment #296
Payments mill be assigned by the other Districts to and payment #297
thereof shall be directed to the Trustee as security for and as #298
source of payment for the Certificates. The. Installment Payments of #299
each District shall, subject to any rights of yrepayment provided in #300
Article VI, be due in twelve (12) installments of principal over a #301
year period in the principal amounts and on the Principal #302,3
Payment Dates in the years set forth in Appendix A, with interest #304
thereon due on February 1 and August 1, of each year, commencing #305
February 1, 1987 at the rates set forth below and in accordance z(ith #306
Section 3.02 hereof: # (306)
_7- #19
�../ 94948.1.2704.05:1 # (19)
Installment #31n
payment Installment Interest #
Date Payment Rate #3Z2,3:
Each District ' s Installment Payment and the interest #319
(hereon shall be payable directly to the Trustee in accordance with #320 ,3:
the terms hereof in lawful money of the United States of America. In #322,3:
the event any of the Districts fails to make any of the payments #324
required to be made by it under this Section 3.01, such payment shall #325
continue as an obligation of such District until much amount shall #326
have been fully paid and such District agrees to pay the same with #' -'
interest thereon at the rate of % . # �7)
The obligation of each District to make the Installment #328
Payments and the interest thereon, from and to the extent of all #329,3:
sources Qf legally available monies of each such District is absolute #331 ,3:
and unconditional, whether or not the Project shall be completed, and #333,3:
until such time as its Installment Payments, and the interest thereon #335
shall have been fully paid Sor provision for the payment thereof #336 ,3
shall have been made) , Pach District will not, under any circum- #338,3
stances, discontinue or suspend any Installment Payments Qr any #340
interest thereon required to be made by it under this Section 3.01 #341
when due, whether or not the Project Qr any part thereof is operating #342
or operable or has been completed, or whether or not the Project is #343
condemned or seized or its use is suspended, interfered with, seduced #344,3-
or curtailed or terminated in whole or in part, and much payments #346
shall not be subject to reduction whether by Offset, counterclaim, #347
defense, recoupment, abatement, suspension, deferment or otherwise #348
and shall not be conditional upon the performance or nonperformance #349
by any party of any agreement or covenant contained herein for any #350
cause whatsoever. #351
-8- #19
94948.1.2704.05. 1 # t , ,
SECTION 3.02. Several Obligations. As a several obligor #353
..i each District is obligated hereunder only to the axtent of its #354
Installment Payments, and is not obligated to pay any obligation #355
hereunder of any other District. # (355)
SECTION 3.03. Interest on the Installment Payments. The #357
Installment Payments shall bear interest from the date of the #358
Certificates until the payment of the principal hereof and the pre- #359,3
payment premiums, if any, hereon, shall have been made 2r provided #361
for in accordance with the provisions hereof, xhether at maturity, #362
upon prepayment or otherwise. Interest Accrued on the Installment #363
Payments from the date of 2riginal delivery of the Certificates and #364
from each Interest payment Date to, but not including, the next suc- #365
ceeding Interest Payment Date shall be paid on each such succeeding #366,3
Interest Payment Date and shall be computed on the basis of a year of #368,3
360 days and 12 30-day months. # (370)
SECTION 3.04. Payments to Trustee and Paying Agent. (a) #372
Each District shall pay to the Trustee and the Paying Agent the #(372)
amounts Zequired pursuant to Sections 8.03 and 8.06 of the Trust #373
Agreement. #374
lb) The Districts acknowledge that the Trustee and the #376
paying Agent are third party beneficiaries of this Agreement for #377 ,3
Acquisition and Construction with respect to their rights to Leceive #380
the payments described in this Section 3.04. # (380)
as SECTION 3.05. Additional Security. District No. 1 hereby #382
agrees to hold in trust as fiduciary and agent for the other #383
Districts an Installment Payment Priority Fund. Bach District hereby #384
agrees to deliver to District No. 1 and District No. 1 hereby agrees #385
to hold, together with its own contribution thereto in the #386
Installment Payment Priority Fund such amounts as agreed to by the #387
Districts which amounts will be applied to secure prompt payment of #388
each District's Installment Payments. # (388)
ARTICLE IV #389
LEGALLY AVAILABLE MONIES= COVENANT REGARDING #(389)
BUDGET #(389)
SECTION 4.01. Legally Available Monies. Each District's #391
Installment Payments shall be paid from any source of legally avail- #(391)
able funds of the District, and the District hereby covenants to take #(391)
such action as may be necessary to include all Installment Payments #392
and 2ther amounts due hereunder in its annual budget, and to make the #393
necessary annual appropriations for all such Installment Payments #394
which covenants of the District shall be deemed to be, and shall be, # (394)
=9- #19
94948 .1 .2704.05: 1 #(19)
ministerial duties imposed by law, and it shall be the duty of each #30S
and every public official Qf the District to take such action and do #.
such things as are Lequired by law in the performance of the official #Prr
duty of such Officials to enable the District to carry out and per- #398
form the covenants made by the District in this Agreement. During #399
the Term of this Agreement, the District will furnish to the Trustee, # (399)
no later than 20 days following adoption of the budget for that #400
fiscal year a Certificate of the Clerk of the District that the # ( 400)
Installment Payments due in -that fiscal year have been included in #401
the budget approved by the Board of Education of the District for #(401)
such fiscal year; Qr if no budget has been approved by August 15, the #402
Participant shall deliver to the Trustee no later than August 20 of # (402)
such year, a Certificate of the Clerk of the Participant that the #403
Installment Payments due in that fiscal year have been appropriated # ( 403)
by a resolution duly adopted by the aoard of Directors of the #404
District. # ( 404)
SECTION 4.02. Allocation of Legally Available Monies. #406
(a) On or before -the twenty-sixth (26th) day of each calendar month, #407
each District shall, solely from monies legally available for the #408
payment therefor, deposit in the Installment Payment Account in the # (408)
Installment Payment Fund a sum equal to ane-sixth (1/6th) of its per- #409,4.
centage of (as set forth under Section 3.01) the amount of interest #411
becoming due hereunder on the next Interest Payment Date plus (after #412
1, 19 ) one-twelfth it/12th) of its percentage (as set #413
forth under Section 3.01) of the amount of principal becoming due # ( 413)
hereunder on the next Principal Payment Date. #4' 4
No deposit need be made in the Installment Payment Account #4Y5
in the Installment Payment Eund by any District with respect to #416
interest becoming due hereunder if the amount contained in such #417
District' s Installment Payment Account in the Installment Payment # (417)
Fund iexcluding money designated for the prepayment of Certificates) #418 ,C
is at least equal to the amount of interest for which such District # (419)
is responsible for payment hecoming due hereunder on the next #420
Interest Payment Date and lafter January 1, 19 ) the amount of prin- #421
cipal for which such District is responsible for payment becoming due # (421)
hereunder on the next Principal Payment Date. #422
All money in the Installment Payment Fund Shall be used and #423 ,4
withdrawn by the Trustee in accordance with the Trust Agreement. #425
Sb) Reserve Accounts in the Reserve Fund. On or before #427
the twenty-sixth 126th) day of each calendar month, each District #428
shall, solely from monies legally available for the payment therefor, # (428)
deposit in its Reserve Account in the Reserve Fund that sum, if any, #429,4.
necessary to restore its Reserve Account in the Reserve Fund to an #431
amount equal to its Reserve Requirement Qr , in the event that a #432
deficiency in such Reserve Account is based upon the valuation of the #433
-10- #19
94948.1.2704.05: 1 # (,
amounts on deposit therein in Accordance with this subparagraph (b) , #434
�..i then an amount equal to one-third of such deficiency. #435
lio deposit need be made in such Reserve Account if the #436
amount available and contained therein (valued from time to time in #437,4
accordance with the next succeeding paragraph) is at least equal to #439
the Reserve Requirement for such Reserve Account. # (439)
If at any time the amount available and contained in a #440 ,4
District's Reserve Account in the Reserve Fund exceeds an amount # (441)
equal to the Reserve Requirement for such Reserve Account and if the #442
District is not then in default hereunder, the Trustee shall withdraw #443
the amount of such excess from such Reserve Account. On or before #444
&ompletion of the Acquisition of the Project, the Trustee shall #445,4
deposit such amount such District's Acquisition Account in the # (446)
Acquisition Fund (as that term is defined in the Trust Agreement) , #447
and after Qompletion of the Acquisition of the Project, the Trustee #448 ,4
shall deposit such amount in the Installment Payment Account of such #450
District in the Installment Payment Fund. For purposes of tletermin- #451
ing the amount on deposit in the Reserve Fund, the Trustee shall make #452
a valuation of the Reserve Fund as often as it may deem appropriate, #453
and in any event as of July 1 of each year. Except for such with- #454,4
drawals, all money in each District's Reserve Account shall be used #456
and withdrawn by the Trustee solely for the purpose of making such #457 ,4
District's Installment Payments in the event that money on deposit in #459
such District ' s Installment Payment Account is insufficient #(459)
therefor. Qne District's Reserve Account is not available to make up #460
a deficiency in the Installment Payment Account of any other # ( 460)
District. # ( 460)
ARTICLE V #462
COVENANTS OF THE DISTRICTS # ( 462)
SECTION 5.01. Compliance with Agreement for Acquisition and #464
Construction. Each District hereby agrees with each other District # ( 464)
to punctually pay its Installment Payments and the interest thereon #465
in strict conformity with the terms hereof, and to faithfully observe #466 ,4
and perform all the agreements, conditions, covenants and terms con- #468
tained herein required to be observed and performed by it, and fur- #469
ther agrees that it will not terminate the Agreement for Acquisition #470,4
and Construction for any cause ikhatsoever, including, without limit- #472
ing the generality of the foregoing, any acts or circumstances that #473
may constitute failure of consideration, destruction of or damage to #474
the Project, .0ommercial frustration of purpose, any change 1n the tax #475,4-
or other laws of the United states of America or yf the State of #477
California or any political subdivision of Either or any failure of #478
=11- #19
94948 .1.2704.05: 1 # (19)
any other District to observe or perform any agreement, condition, #` J
covenant or term required to be observed and performed by it con- #430
tained herein, whether axpress or implied, or any duty, liability or #481
obligation arising out of or connected with the Agreement for #482
Acquisition and Construction. # (482)
Each District hereby agrees with each other District to #483
faithfully observe and perform all the agreements, conditions, cove- #484
nants and terms contained in the Trust Agreement required to be #485,41
observed and performed by it, and it is expressly understood and #487
agreed by and among the parties to the Agreement for Acquisition and #488
Construction and the Trust Agreement that each of the agreements, #489,4'
Qonditions, covenants and terms contained in each such Qontract and #491,4'
agreement is an essential and material term of the payment for the #493
Project by the Districts. #(493)
Each District hereby agrees with each other District to #494
faithfully observe and perform all the agreements, conditions, cove- #495
nants and terms required to he observed and performed by it pursuant #496
to all outstanding Qther obligations and indebtedness to which it is #497
a party. # (497)
SECTION 5.02. Against Encumbrances on Net Enterprise #499
Revenues. Each District hereby agrees with each other District to # (499)
not make any pledge of or place any lien on the Net Enterprise #500
Revenues. #S"'
SECTION 5. 03 . Against Sale or Other Disposition of #503
Property. Each District hereby agrees with each other District to #(503)
not sell, lease or otherwise dispose of its Enterprise or any part #504
thereof essential to the proper operation of its Enterprise; provided #505,5(
however, any real or personal property which has become nonoperative #507
or which is not needed for the efficient and proper operation of its #508
Enterprise, or any material or equipment which has become worn out, #509
may be sold Qr exchanged at not less than the market value thereof. #510
Each District hereby agrees with each other District to not #511
enter into any agreement or lease which impairs the operation of its #512
Enterprise or any part thereof necessary to secure adequate monies #513
legally available for the payment of the Installment Payments or the #514
interest thereon. # (514)
SECTION 5.04. Against Competitive Facilities. Each #516
District hereby agrees with each other District to not, to the extent #517
permitted by law, acquire, maintain or operate and will not, to the #518
extent permitted by law and within the scope of its powers, permit #519
any other public or private agency, corporation, district or #520
political subdivision or any person whomsoever to acquire, maintain #521
- 2- #l '
�./
94948.1 .2704.05: 1 # (19)
or Qperate within such District any sanitary sewer system competitive #522 ,5
with its Enterprise. # (523)
SECTION 5.05. Tax Covenants. Each District hereby agrees #525
with each other District to not make any use of the proceeds of the #526
obligation provided herein or any other funds of the District which #527
will cause such Qbligation to be (a) an "arbitrage bond" subject to #528
federal income taxation by reason of Section 103(c) of the Internal #529
Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the "Code") ; (b) a "_consumer loan #530,5
bond" by reason of Section 103(o) of the Code Qr, (c) a "federally #532
guaranteed obligation" by reason of Section 103(h) of the Code. To #533
that end, so long as any of its Installment Payments Qr the interest #534
thereon Are unpaid, the District, with respect to such proceeds and #535,5
such other funds, will comply with all requirements of such Section #537
103(c) and all regulations of the United States Department of the #538
Treasury issued thereunder to the extent that such requirements are, #539
at the time, applicable and in effect. #540
Each District hereby agrees with each other District not to #541
use or permit the use of the Project Qr its output by any person not #542
an "exempt person" within the meaning of Section 103(b) (3) of the #543
Code or by an "_exempt person" (including the Districts) in an #544
"unrelated trade Qr business" within the meaning of Section 513(a) of #545
the lode, in such manner or to such extent as would result in the #546
lose of exemption from federal income tax of the interest on the #547 ,5
Installment Payments under Section 103(a) of the Code. #549
SECTION 5.06. Prompt Acquisition. District No . 1 , as #551
..i agent of the other Districts, hereby agrees to cause Acquisition of #552
the Project to be made in an expeditious manner and in conformity #553
with law so as to complete the same as soon as possible. #554
SECTION 5.07. Maintenance and Operation of the Enterprise; #556
Budgets. Each District hereby agrees with each other District to # (556)
maintain and preserve its Enterprise in good repair and working order #557
At all times and will operate its Enterprise in an efficient and eco- #558,5
nomical manner and will pay all Maintenance and Operation Costs of #560
its Enterprise as they become due and payable. On or before one hun- #561,5
dred twenty (120) days after the first stay of each Fiscal Year each #563
District will adopt and file with the Boards of Directors setting #564,5
forth the estimated Maintenance and Operation Costs of its Enterprise #566
for such Fiscal Year. Any budget may be amended at Any time during #567,5
any Fiscal Year. # (568)
SECTION 5.08. Payment of Claims. Each District hereby #570
agrees with each other District to pay and discharge any and all #571
lawful claims for labor, materials or supplies which, if unpaid, #572
might become a lien an its Net Enterprise Revenues or any part #573
thereof or on any funds in the hands of the District or the Trustee #574
=13- #19
94948.1.2704.05: 1 # (19)
prior or superior to the lien of the Installment Payments or the #5-s
interest thereon. #'�'3)
SECTION 5.09. Compliance with Contracts. Each District #577
hereby agrees with each other District to Comply with, keep, observe #578
and perform all agreements, Conditions, covenants and terms, express #579
or implied, required to be performed by it contained in all contracts #580
for the use 2f its Enterprise and all other contracts affecting or #581
involving its Enterprise to the extent that such District is a party #582,5
thereto. # (583)
SECTION 5.10. Insurance. (a) To the extent commercially #585
available at reasonable cost, each District hereby agrees with each #586
other District to procure and maintain insurance 2n its Enterprise #587
with responsible insurers in such amounts and against such risks #588
(including accident to or destruction of its Enterprise) as are usu- #589
ally covered in Connection with sewer systems similar to its #590
Enterprise so long as such insurance is available from reputable #591
insurance companies. In the event of any damage to or destruction of #592,5
its Enterprise caused by the perils Covered by such insurance, the #594
Net Proceeds thereof shall be applied to the reconstruction, repair #595
or replacement of the damaged or destroyed portion of its #596
Enterprise. The I2istrict so affected shall begin such reconstruc- #597
tion, repair or replacement promptly after such damage or destruction #598
shall occur, and shall continue and properly complete such recon- #599
struction, repair or replacement as expeditiously as possible, and #600
shall gay out of such Net Proceeds all costs and expenses in Qonnec- #F" ,6
tion with such reconstruction, repair or replacement so that the same #
shall be completed and its Enterprise shall be free and clear of all #604
claims and liens. If such Net Proceeds exceed the costs of such #605
reconstruction, repair or replacement, then the excess Net Proceeds #606
shall be applied to the prepayment of its Installment Payments as #607
provided in Article VI. If such Net Proceeds are sufficient to #608
enable the District so affected to retire its entire obligation evi- #609
denced hereby prior to the final due date of the Installment #610
Payments, the District so affected may elect not to reconstruct, #611
repair or replace the damaged or destroyed portion of its Enterprise, #612
and thereupon such Net Proceeds shall be applied to the prepayment of #613,6
its Installment Payments as provided in Article VI. #615
ib) Each District hereby agrees with each other District to #617 ,6
procure and maintain such other insurance which it shall deem advis- #619
able or necessary to protect its interests Xhich insurance shall #620,6
afford protection in such amounts and against such risks as are usu- #622
ally covered in connection with alectric systems similar to its #623
Enterprise; provided that any such insurance may be maintained under #624
a self insurance program so long as such self-insurance is maintained #625,6
in the amounts and manner usually maintained in Connection with sewer #627
Systems similar to its Enterprise. # (627)
=14- #19
94948.1.2704.05: 1 # h.A
All policies of insurance required to be maintained herein #628,6;
shall provide that the Trustee shall be given thirty (30) days' writ- #630
ten notice of any intended cancellation thereof or reduction of cov- #631
erage provided thereby. #(631)
SECTION 5.11. Accounting Records; Financial Statements and #632
Other Reports. #(632)
.(a) Each District hereby agrees with each other District to #634
keep appropriate accounting records in which complete and correct #635
entries shall be made ,4f all transactions relating to its Enterprise, #636
which records shall be available for inspection by the Trustee at #637 ,6:
reasonable hours and under reasonable conditions. # (638)
Sb) Each District hereby agrees with each other District to #640
prepare and file with the Irustee annually within one hundred and #641 ,6.
twenty (120) days after the close of each Fiscal Isar (commencing #643
with the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1987) # (643)
1. financial statements of the District (which may #645
be the Annual Financial Statements of the County Sanitation #646
Districts of Orange County, California) for the preceding #647
Fiscal Year prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted #648
Accounting Principles, together with an Accountant's Report #649
thereon and a special report prepared by the Independent #650
Certified Public Accountant Rho examined such financial #651
statements stating that nothing came to his attention in #652
connection with such examination that caused him to believe #653
that the District was not in compliance with any of the #654
agreements or covenants contained herein; and #655
2. a detailed report as to all insurance policies #657 ,6!
maintained and self-insurance programs maintained by each #659
District with respect to its Enterprise as of the close of #660
such Fiscal Year, including the names of the insurers which #661
have issued the policies and the amounts thereof and the #662
property or risks covered thereby. #663
-Lc) Each District hereby agrees with each other District to #665
prepare annually not more than cne hundred and twenty (120) days #666
after the close of each Fiscal Year (commencing with the Fiscal Year #667
ending June 30, 1987) a summary report showing in reasonable detail #668
its Gross Revenues and the Maintenance and Operation Costs of its #669,6'
Enterprise for such Fiscal Year and containing a general statement of #671
the physical condition of its Enterprise. The City will furnish a #672
copy of such gummary report to the Trustee and to any investment #673,6'
bankers, security dealers and others interested in the Agreement for #675
Acquisition and Construction requesting copies thereof. #676
is- #19
\./ 94948.1.2704.05: 1 # (19)
SECTION 5.12. Protection of Security and Rights. Each #6'q
District hereby agrees with each other District to preserve and pro- # 8)
tect the security and the rights of each other District to its #6Y"
Installment Payments and the interest thereon hereunder and will war- #68016
rant such rights against all claims and demands of all persons. #682
SECTION 5 . 13 . Payment of Taxes and Compliance with #684
Governmental Regulations. Each District hereby agrees with each # (684)
other District to pay and discharge all taxes, assessments and other #685,6
governmental charges, if any, which may hereafter be lawfully imposed #687
upon its Enterprise or any part thereof or upon its Gross Revenues #688
when the same shall become due. Each District hereby agrees with #689
each other District to duly observe and conform with all valid regu- #690
lations and requirements of any governmental authority relative to #691
the operation of its Enterprise or any part thereof, but the District #692
shall not he required to comply with any regulations or requirements #693
so long as the validity or application thereof shall be contested in #694,6
good faith. # (695)
SECTION 5.14. Amount of Rates and Charges. Each District #697
hereby agrees with each other District to fix, prescribe and collect 0698
rates and charges for its Sewer Service which are reasonable and fair #699,7
and which will be at least sufficient to yield during each Fiscal #701
Year sufficient legally available monies equal to at least one hun- #702
dred percent (100%) cf the Installment Payments and interest thereon #703
lless any transfers estimated to be made pursuant to Section 4.02(b) #704,7
hereof) in addition to all other costs and expenses gf the District #7-�
for such Fiscal Year. Such District may make adjustments from time #
to time in such rates and charges and may make such classification #7`76
thereof as it deems necessary, but shall not reduce the rates and #709
charges then in effect ilnless such reduced Lates and charges will at #710,7
all times be sufficient to meet the Lequirements of this #712
Section 5.14. # (712)
SECTION 5,15, Improvements to the Enterprise. Each #714
District hereby acknowledges that its ability to manage the expenses #715
of its Enterprise and to increase its Levenues through satisfaction #716
of demands is essential to the payment and security of its #717
Installment Payments and the interest thereon and accordingly each #718,7
District covenants that, unless funds are otherwise available there- #720
for , the District will proceed with all Leasonable diligence and at #721
the earliest practical time to create capital reserves, issue bonds #722
or execute contracts to finance the costs of such additions, better- #723
ments, extensions and improvements to its Enterprise as may be rea- #724
sonably necessary to provide sewer service at reasonable cost and #725
distribution system capacity to enable the District to satisfy its #726 ,7
present projected sewer service demands upon its Enterprise. To that #728
end, each District covenants with the owners of all Certificates at #729
any time outstanding that the District will Establish and at all #730
-16- #19
94948.1.2704.05: 1 # ' )
times maintain and collect rates and 2harges for the sale or use of #731
sewer service furnished by the Districts sufficient to permit the #732,7:
District to create capital revenues, issue bonds and execute con- #734
tracts to finance the construction and completion of all such addi- #735
tions, betterments, extensions and improvements. #736
,SECTION 5.16. Collection of Rates and Charges. Each #738
District hereby agrees with each other District to have in effect at # (738)
all times rules and regulations requiring each consumer or customer 4739
located on any premises connected with its Enterprise to pay the #740
rates and charges applicable to the Sewer Service to such premises #741 ,7,
and providing for the billing thereof and for a due Hate and a delin- #743
quency date for each bill. In each case where such bill remains #744
unpaid in whole or in part after it becomes delinquent, the Districts #745
may discontinue such premises from the Enterprise, and such premises #746
shall not -thereafter be reconnected to the Enterprise until all #747
delinquent bills and penalties (if any) have been paid or provision #748,7•
satisfactory to the Districts for such payment shall have been made, #750
together with the charges for reconnection to the Enterprise. The #751
City will not permit any part of the Enterprise or any facility #752
thereof to be used or taken advantage of free of charge by any corpo- #753
ration, firm or person, or by any public agency (including the United #754
States Qf America, the State of California and any city, county, dis- #755,7:
trict, political subdivision, public corporation or agency Qf any #757
thereof) . #(757)
SECTION 5.17. Eminent Domain Proceeds. If all or any part #759,7(
of the Enterprise of a District shall be taken by Eminent domain pro- #761
ceedings, the Net Proceeds thereof shall be applied As follows: #762
la) If ( 1) the District obtains and files with the #764
Trustee a Certificate of the District showing (i) the Asti— #765 ,7(
mated loss of annual Net Enterprise Revenues, if any, suf- #767
fered or to be suffered by the District by reason 2f such #768
eminent domain proceedings, (ii) a general description of #769
the additions, betterments, extensions or improvements to #770
the Enterprise proposed to be acquired by the District from #771
such Net Proceeds, and Liii) an estimate of the additional #772
annual Net Enterprise Revenues to be derived from such #773
additions, betterments, Extensions or improvements, and (2) #774
the Trustee, on the basis of such Certificate of the #775
District determines that the estimated additional annual #776
Net Enterprise Revenues will sufficiently offset the esti- #777,7-
mated loss of annual Net Enterprise Revenues resulting from #779
such eminent domain proceedings ao that the ability of the #780
District to meet its obligations hereunder will not be sub- #781
stantially impaired (which determination shall be final and #782
conclusive) , then the District shall promptly proceed with #783
the Acquisition of such additions, betterments, extensions #784
=17- #19
..� 94948.1.2704.05: 1 # (19)
or improvements substantially in accordance with such #
Certificate of the District and such Net Proceeds shall be #jMK
applied for the payment of the costs of such Acquisition, #787
and any Valance of such Net Proceeds not required by the #788
District for such purpose shall be deposited with the #789
Trustee in such District' s Installment Payment Account. # (789)
lb) If the foregoing conditions are not met, then #791
such Net Proceeds shall be applied to the prepayment of #792
such District's Installment Payments as provided in Article #793
VI. # (793)
SECTION 5.18. Further Assurances. Each District hereby #795
agrees with each other District to adopt, deliver, execute and make #796
any and all further assurances, instruments and resolutions as may be #797
reasonably necessary or proper to carry out the intention or to #798
facilitate the performance hereof and for the better assuring and #799, 81
confirming unto the other Districts of the rights and Venefits pro- #801
vided to them herein. # ( 801)
ARTICLE VI #802
PREPAYMENT OF INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS # ( 802)
SECTION 6.01. Prepayment. #P"
is) Each District may or shall, as the case may be, prepay #8v5, 8
on any date from the Net Proceeds of insurance or condemnation awards #807
as provided herein all or any part in integral multiples of $5,000 Qf #808,8(
the principal amount of its unpaid Installment Payments in the #810
inverse order of the times they are due at a prepayment price equal #811
to the sum of the principal amount prepaid plus accrued and unpaid #812
interest thereon to the date of prepayment. #813 ,8
ib) Each of the Districts may prepay its Installment #816,8
Payments in full, by paying the Redemption Price therefor set forth #818
below Qr in part but not in an amount of less than $20,000 at any one #819,8
time . Said option may be exercised with respect to Installment #821
Payments due on and after August 1, 199 , on any Payment Rate com- #822,8
mencing on August 1, 199_. Said option shall be exercised by such #824
District by giving Written notice to the Trustee of the Exercise of #825,8.
such option at least forty-five (45) days prior to said Payment #827
Date. Such option shall be exercised in the event of prepayment in #828,8.
full, by depositing with said notice cash in the amount sufficient to #830
pay the Redemption Price therefor set forth below together with any #831
Installment Payments then due but unpaid, or , in the event of #832
prepayment in part, by depositing with said notice an amount #833
divisible by $5,000 equal to the amount desired to prepay together #834,8.
=18- #'
94948.1 .2704.05: 1 # (19)
with any Purchase Payments then due but unpaid. In any event, said #836 , 8:
cash deposit shall be Equal to the following amount (expressed as a #838,8:
percentage of the amount prepaid) : # ( 839)
Date of Prepayment Redemption Price #842
1 , 1996 and 1, 1997 8 #845
1, 1997 and 1, 1998 #846
1 , 19_ and 1 , 19_ #847
1, 19_ and thereafter #848
In the event of prepayment in part, the partial prepayment shall be #850,8
applied by the Trustee against Installment Payments in inverse order #852
Qf their Payment Date, and the Trustee shall cause to be provided to #853 ,8
the District a revised schedule of Installment payments reflecting #855
said partial prepayment. # ( 855)
Notwithstanding any such prepayment, each District shall #857
not be relieved Qf its obligations hereunder, including its obl'iga- #858
tions under Article III hereof, Until the entire principal amount of #859
its unpaid Installment Payments together with the interest accrued #860
thereon shall have been fully paid Sor provision for payment thereof #861,8-
shall have been made) . # ( 862)
SECTION 6.02. Method of Prepayment. Before making any #864
prepayment pursuant to Section 6.01, each District shall, kEithin five #865
( 5) days following the event permitting the exercise of such right to #866
prepay or creating such obligation to prepay, give written notice to # ( 866)
the Trustee describing such event and specifying the date on which #867
the prepayment will be made, which date shall be not less than thirty #868
( 30) days from the date such notice is given. #869
WMICLE VII #870
EVENTS OP DEPAOLT AND REMEDIES # ( 870)
SECTION 7.01. Events of Default and Events of Mandatory #872
Acceleration; Acceleration of Maturities. If one Qr more of the #873
following Events of Default shall happen, that is to say-- #874
-Ca) if default shall be made in the due and punctual #876,8'
payment by any District of any Installment Payment or any # ( 877)
interest thereon when and as the same shall become due and #878,8'
payable; # ( 879)
=19- #19
94948.1.2704.05: 1 # (19)
lb) if default shall be made by any District in the #v
performance of any of the agreements or covenants contained #b./,8
herein required to be performed by it, and such default #884
shall have continued for a period of thirty ,(30) days after #885
the defaulting District shall have been given notice in # ( 885)
baiting of such default by any of the other Districts or #886
the Trustee; #887
-CO if any District shall file a petition seeking #889
Arrangement or reorganization under the federal bankruptcy #890 ,8
laws or any other applicable law of the united States of #892
America or any state therein, or if a court of competent #893
jurisdiction shall approve a petition filed with the con- #894
sent of any District seeking arrangement Qr reorganization #895
under the federal bankruptcy laws or any other applicable #896
law of the United States of America jar any state therein, #897
or if under the provisions of any ether law for the relief #898
or aid of debtors any court of competent jurisdiction shall #899
assume custody or control Qf any District or of the whole #900
or any substantial part of its property; #901
id) if an event of default shall have occurred b[ith #903 ,9
respect to any District contracts or bonds and the Qut- #905
standing principal amount of such contracts or bonds Shall #906
have been declared immediately due and payable; an Event of # ( 906)
Default having occurred hereunder with respect to one #907
District shall not in and of itself constitute or result in # ' 7)
an Event of Default by any other District hereunder. #9%W
Upon the occurrence and continuance Qf any such Event of #910,9
Default any of the other Districts or the Trustee may, and upon the #(911)
Qccurrence of an Event of Default under subsection (c) above Shell, #912,9
by notice in writing to such District, declare the entire principal #914
amount of such District's unpaid Installment Payments and the accrued #915
interest thereon to be due and payable immediately, and upon any such #916 ,9
declaration the same shall become immediately due and payable, any- #918
thing contained herein to the contrary notwithstanding. #919
This provision, however, is subject to the condition that, #920,9
except with respect to an Event of Default under subsection (c) #922
above, if at any time after the entire principal amount of the unpaid #923
Installment Payments and the accrued interest thereon shell have been #924,9
so declared due and payable and before any judgment or decree for the #926
payment Qf the money due shall have been obtained or entered, the #927
District Shall deposit with the Trustee a sum sufficient to pay the #928,9
unpaid principal amount of the Installment Payments due prior to such #930
declaration and the accrued interest thereon, xith interest on such #931 ,9
overdue installments at the late of 8 per annum and the #933,9
reasonable expenses of the Trustee, and any and all other defaults #935
-20- #19
94948.1 . 2704.05: 1 #N1
known to the Trustee (other than in the payment of the entire #936
principal amount of the unpaid Installment Payments and the accrued #937,9
interest thereon due and payable solely by reason of such #939 , 9
declaration) shall have been made good or cured to the satisfaction #941
of the Trustee or provision deemed by the Trustee to be adequate #942
shall have been made therefor , then and in every such case the #943
Trustee, by written notice to the defaulting District, may rescind #944,9
and annul such declaration and its ,consequences; but no such rescis- #946
sion and annulment shall Pxtend to or shall affect any subsequent #947
default or shall impair or exhaust any right or power consequent #948
thereon. # ( 948)
SECrION 7.02. Application of Funds upon Acceleration. #950
With respect to each District, upon a declaration of acceleration by # ( 950)
the Trustee as provided in Section 7.01, all money in such District's #951
Installment Payment Account, in the Installment Payment fund, in such #952 , 9
District ' s Reserve Account, in the Reserve Fund and in all other # (953)
funds and accounts attributable to such District held by the Trustee #954
created pursuant hereto and to the Trust Agreement upon the date of #955
such declaration of acceleration and all monies thereafter received #956, 9
shall be applied in the following order-- #958
First , to the payment of the costs and expenses of the #959,9
Districts and the Trustee, if any, in carrying out the provisions of #961
this article, including reasonable compensation to its accountants #962
and counsel; # ( 962)
.� S.econd, to the payment of the accrued interest on the prin- #963 , 9
cipal amount of such District's unpaid Installment Payments; # ( 964)
Third, to the payment of the entire principal amount of #965, 9
such District's unpaid Installment Payments. # ( 966)
SECTION 7.03. Other Remedies of the Districts or the #968
Trustee. The Districts or the Trustee shall have the right-- # ( 968)
. a) by mandamus or other action or proceeding or suit #970 ,9
at law or in equity to enforce its rights against the #972
defaulting District or any councilmember , officer or # ( 972)
employee thereof, and to compel such District or any such #973
.councilmember, officer or employee to perform and carry nut #974, 9
its or his duties under applicable law and the agreements #976
and covenants contained herein required to be performed by #977
it or him; # ( 977)
It) by suit in equity to enjoin any acts or things #979
.Which are unlawful or violate the rights of the Districts #980,9
or the Trustee; or # (981)
_21- #19
94948.1. 2704.05: 1 # (19)
-Cc) by suit in equity upon the happening of an Lvent #?"1,9•
of Default to require such District and its councilmembers, #
officers and employees to account as the trustee of an #*
express trust. # (986)
$.ECPION 7.04. Non-Waiver. Nothing in this Article VII dr #988,9
in any other provision hereof shall affect or impair the Obligation #990
of the Districts, which is absolute and unconditional , to pay the #991
Installment Payments and the interest thereon at the respective due #992
dates, Or shall affect or impair the right of the ,Corporation, which #993 ,9
is also absolute and unconditional, to institute suit to enforce such #995
payment by virtue of the contract embodied herein. #996
A waiver of any default or breach of duty or contract by #997 ,9
the Districts or the Trustee shall not affect any subsequent default #999
or breach of duty or contract or impair any rights or remedies on any #1000
such subsequent default or breach of duty or contract. No delay or #1001
omission by the Districts or the Trustee to exercise any right or #1002
remedy accruing upon any default or preach of duty or contract shall #1003
impair any such right or remedy or shall be construed to be a waiver #1004
of any such default or breach of duty or contract or an acquiescence #1005
therein, and every right or remedy conferred upon the Districts or #1006,
the Trustee by applicable law or by this article may be enforced and #1008
exercised from time to time and as often as shall be deemed expedient #1009
by the Districts or the Trustee. # (1009
If any action, proceeding or suit to enforce any tight or #' ' 0,.
exercise any remedy is abandoned or determined adversely to the #1' /
Districts or the Trustee, the Districts and the Trustee shall be #1013
restored to their former positions, rights and remedies as if such #1014
action, proceeding or suit had not been hrought or taken. #1015
$ECPION 7.05. Remedies Not Exclusive. No remedy herein #1017 ,:
conferred upon or reserved to the Districts or the Trustee is #(1018
intended to be exclusive of any other remedy, and each such remedy #1019,
shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every Other remedy #1021
given hereunder or now or hereafter existing in law or in equity or #1022
by statute or otherwise and may be exercised without exhausting and #1023
without regard to any other remedy conferred by any other law. #1024
=22- #19
94948.1 . 2704 .05: 1 # (%.0)
ARTICLE VIII #1025
MISCELLANEOUS # (1025
SECTION 8.01. Liability of Each District Limited to Monies #1027
Legally Available. Notwithstanding anything contained herein, each #1028
District shall not be required to advance any monies derived from any #1029
source of income other than monies legally available And the other #1030
funds provided herein and in the Trust Agreement for the payment of #1031
its Installment Payments and the interest thereon Qr for the per- #1032,
formance of any agreements or covenants contained herein required to #1034
be performed by it. Each District must advance monies for such pur- #1035,
pose so long as such monies are derived from a source legally avail- 41037
able for auch purpose and may be legally used by such District for #1038
such purpose. #1039
The obligation of each District to make its Installment #1040
Payments and the interest thereon is a special Qbligation of such #1041,
District payable solely from monies legally available, and does not #1044
constitute A debt of such District or of the State of California or #1045
of any political subdivision thereof within the meaning of any son- #1046 ,
stitutional debt limitation or restriction. # (1047
SECTION 8.02. Benefits of Installment Payment Contract #1049
Limited to Parties. Except as provided in Section 11•03, nothing #1050
contained herein, express or implied, is intended to give to any #1051
person other than the Districts any right, remedy or Qlaim under or #1052,
pursuant hereto, and any agreement or covenant required herein to be #1054
performed by or on behalf of any District Shall be for the sole and #1055
exclusive henefit of the other Districts. #1056
SECTION 8 . 03 . Successor Is Deemed Included In All #1058
References to Predecessor. Whenever any District is named or #1059
referred to herein, such reference Shall be deemed to include the #1060
successor to the powers, duties and functions that are presently #1061
vested in such District, and all agreements and covenants required #1062
hereby to be performed by or on behalf of such District Shall bind #1063,
and inure to the benefit of the respective successors thereof whether #1065
so expressed or not. # (1065
SECTION 8.04. Waiver of Personal Liability. No member of #1067
the Board of Directors, officer or employee of any District shall be # (1067
individually or personally liable for the payment of the Installment #1068
Payments Qr the interest thereon but nothing contained herein shall #1069,
relieve any member of the Board of Directors, officer or znployee of #1071
any District from the performance of any official duty provided by #1072
any applicable provisions of law or hereby. # (1072
-23- #19
94948.1.2704.05: 1 #(19)
SECTION 8.05. Article and Section Headings, Gender and #: #
References. The headings or titles of the several articles and #N-6
sections hereof and the table of contents appended hereto shall be #1076
solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the meaning, #1077
construction or effect hereof, and words of any gender shall be #1078
deemed and construed to include all genders. All references herein #1079
to "Articles," "Sections" and other subdivisions or clauses are to #1080
the corresponding articles, sections, subdivisions or clauses hereof; #1081,.
and the words "hereby," "herein, " "hereof," "hereto, " aerewith, " #1083
"hereunder" and other words of similar import refer to the Agreement #1084
for Acquisition and Construction as a whole and not to any particular #1085
article, section, subdivision or clause hereof. #1086
SECTION 8.06. Partial Invalidity. If any one or more of #1088,,
the agreements or covenants or portions thereof contained herein #1090
required to be performed by or on the part cf any of the Districts #1091
shall be contrary to the law, Shen such agreement or agreements, such #1092
covenant or covenants cr such portions thereof shall be null and void #1093
and shall be deemed separable from the remaining agreements and cove- #1094
nants ar portions thereof and shall in no way affect the validity #1095
hereof. Each District hereby declares that it would have executed #1096 ,
the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, and each and every #1098
other article, section, paragraph, subdivision, sentence, clause and #1099
phrase hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more articles, #1100
sections, paragraphs, subdivisions, sentences, clauses or phrases #1101
hereof or the application thereof to any person or circumstance may #1702,.
be held to be unconstitutional, unenforceable or invalid. #:�3
SECTION 8.07. Assignment. The Agreement for Acquisition #1106
and Construction and any rights hereunder of the Districts against #1107
each other will be assigned by Each of the Districts to the Trustee #1108
to secure the Certificates. # (1108:
SECTION 8.08. Het Contract. The Agreement for Acquisition #1110
and Construction shall be deemed and construed to be a net contract, #1111,
and each of the Districts shall pay absolutely net during the term #1113
hereof the Installment Payments, the interest thereon and all other #1114
payments required hereunder free of any deductions and without abate- #1115
ment, diminution or set-off Nhatsoever. #1116
SECTION 8.09. California Law. T h e Agreement for #1118
Acquisition and Construction shall be construed and governed in #1119
accordance with the laws of the State of California. #1120
SECTION 8.10. Notices. All written notices to be given #1122,.
hereunder shall be given by mail to the party entitled thereto at its #1124
address set forth in Appendix A hereto, or at such other address as #1125
such party may provide to the other party in N.riting from time to #1126
time. # (1126,
=24- #10
94948.1 .2704.05: 1 # (
SECTION 8.11. Effective Date. The Agreement for #1129
Acquisition and Construction Shall become effective upon its execu- #1130
... tion and delivery, and shall terminate when all Installment Payments #1131
and the interest thereon shall have been fully paid for provision for #1132,
the payment thereof shall have been made to the written satisfaction #1134
of all Districts and the Trustee) . # (1134
aECTION 8.12. Execution in Counterparts. The &greement #1136,
for Acquisition and Construction may be executed in several counter- #1138
parts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which #1139
shall constitute but one and the same instrument. # (1139
SECTION 8.13. Amendments. This Agreement for Acquisition #1141
and Construction may only be amended in writing by the Districts fol- #1142 ,
lowing the prior written consent of the Trustee. Any amendment made #1144,
in violation of this Section 8 .13 shall be a nullity and void. # (1145
=25- #19
... 94948.1.2704.05: 1 # (19)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and #�,7 ,:
attested the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction by -their #1149
officers thereunto duly authorized as of the day and year first writ- #1150
ten above. # (1150)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #1153
NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(1153)
CALIFORNIA # (1153:
ay #1155
Title: #1156
SEAL) #1158
Attest: #1160
#1162
Secretary # (1162:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #. 4
NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(11641
CALIFORNIA # ( 1164:
ay #1166
Title: #1167
_CS EAL) #1169
Attest: #1171
#1173
Secretary # (1173:
=26- #19
94948.1.2704.05. 1 # (24)
ZOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #1175
NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(1175
CALIFORNIA # (1175
By #1177
Title: #1178
-SEAL) #1180
attest: #1182
#1184
Secretary # (1184
-COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #1186
NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY. #(1186
CALIFORNIA # (1186
By #1188
Title: #1189
-SEAL) #1191
Attest: #1193
#1195
Secretary # (1195
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #1197
NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY. #(1197
CALIFORNIA #( 1197
gy #1199
Title: #1200
=27- #19
94948.1 .2704.05: 1 # (19)
jSEAL) #1202
Attest: #1hd4
#1206
Secretary # (1206:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #1208
NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(1208:
CALIFORNIA # (1208
Hy #1210
Title: #1211
SSEAL) #1213
Attest: #1215
#1117
Secretary # 17:
=28- #19
94948.1. 2704.05: 1 # 1�
APPENDIX A #1222
I. APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS OF CERTIFICATES #1224
Funded Reserve Acquisition #1227
Interest Account Account #1228
Dist. No. Deposit Requirement Deposit #1229,
1 #1233
2 #1234
#1235
4 41236
$ #1237
y #1238
14 #1239
II. INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS #1243
District No. 1 #1246
District No. 2 #1248
..i 14948.1.2704.05: 1 #18
Yi) i T =S0'40LZ 'T'89696
6TC -Z=
65ZT# aDIULSIa HDVS JV NOSHHd 'I27
99ZT9 vt
YSZT# 9 45W
ZSZTS 7-79-75TJ 4sTQ
C i E -ON�. '1=
6/30/86 #18
#21
TRUST AGREEMENT #24
by and among 426
, the Trustee #28
and #30
the Paying Agent #32
and #34
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, 437
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, 438
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, #39
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, 440
_ -COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #42
and #44
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 445
Dated as of August 1, 1986 448
RELATING TO THE 450
S ,000 #51
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION t52
REPRESENTING A DIRECT AND PROPORTIONATE #53
JNTEREST IN PAYMENTS DUE #54
DNDER AND PURSUANT TO THE #55
AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION AND 456
CONSTRUCTION OF JOINT FACILITIES 457
#59
24948 .1 . 2704 .07 :1 #10
TABLE OF CONTENTS #185?
Page #(185T
I #1855
Definitions; Equal Security # (185_`
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 #1855
1..02. Equal Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 #1855
II #1855
Terms and Conditions of Certificates # (185_
2.01. Preparation of Certificates . . . 6 #1855
2.02. Denominations, Medium, Method and #1855
Place of Payment and Dating of # (185_
Certificates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 # (185°
2..03. Payment Dates . . . . . . . . . . . 7 #1855
1.04. Form of Certificates . . . . . 7 #1855
2,.05. Execution and Authentication of #1855
Certificates . . . . . . . . 7 4 (185°
2.06. Transfer and Exchange of #1855
Certificates . . . . . . 8 # (185`_
2.07. Certificate Registration Books . . . . . 8 #1855
1.08. Temporary Certificates . . . 8 #185F
1.09. Certificates Mutilated, Destroyed, #185
Lost or Stolen . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 # (185_
jII #1855
Proceeds of Certificates # (185°
3.01. Delivery of Certificates . . . .10 #1855
2..02. Deposit of Proceeds of Certificates . .10 #1855
3.03. Use of Money in the Acquisition Fund . .10 #1855
;v #1855
Prepayment (Redemption) of Certificates #(1855
¢.01. Redemption . . . . . . .12 #1855
!1.02. Selection of Certificates for #1855
Prepayment . . . . . . . . . . . .13 # (185?
g.03. Notice of Prepayment . . . .13 #1855
1.04. Partial Prepayment of Certificates . . .14 #1855
-i- #1850
TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued i1854
Page i (1854
q.05. Effect of Prepayment . . . . . . . . . .14 41855
Y i1855
Reserve Accounts, Installment Payment Accounts 4 (1855
and Certificate Payment Account 5 (1855
5.01. Reserve Accounts . . . . . . .15 41855
6.02. Installment Payment Accounts . . . . . .16 i1855
6.03 . Certificate Payment Account . . . . . .16 51855
VI i1855
Covenants i (1855
6.01. Compliance with Trust Agreement . . . .17 i1855
6.02. Compliance with Agreement for 41855
Acquisition and Construction . . . . .17 i (1855
6.03. Observance of Laws and Regulations . . .17 41855
6.04. Other Liens . . . . .18 41855
6.05. Prosecution and Defense of Suits . . . .18 i1855
6.06. Accounting Records and Statements . . .19 t1855
...r 6.07. Recordation and Filing . . . . . . . . .19 41855
6 .08. Further Assurances . . . . . . . . . . .19 41855
YII 41855
Default and Limitations of Liability 4 (1855
7.01. Action on Default or Acceleration . . .20 #1855
7 .02. Other Remedies of the Trustee . . . . .20 i1855
7.03. Non waiver . . . . . . . . . . .21 i1855
7.04. Remedies Not Exclusive . .21 41855
7.05. No Liability by each District to the 11855
Owners . . . .21 i (1855
7.06. No Liability by the Trustee to the i1855
Owners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22 4 (1855
-ii- 41850
TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued #185,
Page # (18SZ
VIII #1855
The Trustee # (1855
Q.01. Employment of the Trustee . . . . . .22 #1855
Q.02. Removal and Resignation of the #1855
Trustee . .22 # (1855
1.03. Compensation and Indemnification of #1855
the Trustee . . . . . . . . .23 # (1855
9.04. Protection of the Trustee . . . . . . .24 #1855
8.05. Appointment of Paying Agent . . . . . .25 #1855
11 #1855
AMENDMENT OF OR SUPPLEMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT # (1855
9.01. Amendment or Supplement by Consent #1855
of Owners . . . . . . . . .26 # (1855
9.02. Disqualified Certificates . . . . . .26 #1855
9.03. Endorsement or Replacement of #1855
Certificates After Amendment or # (1855
Supplement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 #(1855
$ #1855
DEFEASANCE 4 (1855
10.01 . Discharge of Certificates and Trust #1855
Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . .27 # (185`
10 .02. Unclaimed Moneys . . . . . . . . . . . .29 #1855
XI #1855
Miscellaneous # (1855
11.01. Benefits of Trust Agreement Limited #1855
to Parties . . . .29 # (1855
11.02. Successor Deemed Included in all #1855
References to Predecessor . . . .29 # (1855
11.03. Execution of Documents by Owners . . . .30 #1855
11.04. Waiver of Personal Liability . . .30 #1855
11.05. Acquisition of Certificates by each #1855
District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 #(1855
_iii- #1850
TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued f1854
Page O (1854
11.06. Content of Certificates . . . . . . . .30 01855
11.07. Notice by Mail . . . . . . . . . . . . .31 51855
11.08. Funds . . . . . . . . . . . .31 i1855
1.1.09. Investments . .32 i1855
11.10. Article and Section Headings, Gender #1855
and References . . . . . . . . . . .32 t(1855
11.11. Partial Invalidity . . . . . . . . . . .32 41855
11.12. California Law . . . . . . . . . . . . .33 t1855
11.13. Notices . . . . . . . .33 i1855
11.14. Effective Date . . . . . . . .33 i1855
11.15. Execution in Counterparts . . . . . . .33 11855
-iv- 41850
TRUST AGREEMENT #63
This TRUST AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of August 1, #66,67
1986, by and among , a banking associ- # (67)
ation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of #68
(the "Trustee") , _ organized and #69 ,70
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of _ #72
( the "Paying Agent") , County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange #73
County, California, County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange #74
County, California, County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange #75
County, California, County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange #76
County, California, County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange #77
County, California and County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange #78
County, California, each constituting a "county sanitation district" #79
duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of #80,81
California, including particularly the County Sanitation District Act #82
(the "Act") of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California #83
(singularly, a "District, " collectively, the "Districts") ; #84
W I T N E S S E T H: #86
WHEREAS, the Districts have executed and entered into an #88,89
Agreement for Acquisition and Construction of ,joint Facilities dated #90
as of August 1 , 1986 ( the "Agreement for Acquisition and #91
Construction") , whereby each District has agreed to Acquire certain , #92,�
works and facilities for the handling, treatment and disposal of #94
sewage and industrial waste from each such District in the manner #95
described therein; and #96
WHEREAS, under and pursuant to the Agreement for #97
Acquisition and Construction, each District is obligated to the other #98
Districts to pay installment payments for the costs of such #99
Acquisition; and # (99)
WHEREAS, each District has assigned without recourse all #100,1
its rights to receive such installment payments to the Trustee pursu- #102
ant to an assignment agreement; and # (102)
WHEREAS, in consideration of such assignment and the execu- #103
tion and entering into of this trust agreement (the "Trust #104
Agreement") , the Trustee has agreed to execute and the Paying Agent #105
has agreed to authenticate and deliver certificates of participation #106
in an aggregate principal amount equal to the aggregate principal #107
Amount of such installment payments, each evidencing and representing #108
a direct and proportionate interest in such installment payments; and #109
WHEREAS, all acts, conditions and things required by law to #110
exist, to have happened and to have been performed precedent to and #111
in connection with the execution and entering into of the Trust #112
24948 .1 .2704.07:1 #10
Agreement do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular #113
..i and due time, form and manner as required by law, and the parties #114
hereto are now duly authorized to execute and enter into the Trust #115
Agreement; #116
MOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PROMISES AND OF THE #117
MUTUAL AGREEMENTS AND COVENANTS CONTAINED HEREIN AND FOR OTHER YALU- #118,1
ABLE CONSIDERATION, THE PARTIES HERETO DO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: #(119)
ARTICLE I #120
DEFINITIONS; EQUAL SECURITY # (120)
MECTION 1.01. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise #122
requires, the terms defined in this Section 1.01 shall for all pur- #123
poses hereof and of any amendment hereof or gupplement hereto and of #124
the Certificates and of any certificate, opinion, request or other #125
document mentioned herein gr therein have the meanings defined 4126
herein, the following definitions to be equally applicable to both #127
the singular and plural forms of any gf the terms defined herein. #128
All capitalized terms used in the Agreement for Acquisition and # (128)
Construction and not defined herein shall have the meaning Ascribed #129,1
thereto in the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction: #(130)
Acquire, Acquired or Acquisition #132
"Acquire, Acquired or Acquisition" means the acquisition 1 (132)
�../ and construction of an ownership interest in, or a capacity right in #133
or right to use, the Project or the construction And ownership of the #134
Project. #(134)
Acquisition Fund #136
"Acquisition Fund" means the fund by that name established # (136)
in Section 3.02 hereof. #(136)
Act of Bankruptcy #138
"Act of Bankruptcy" means the filing of a petition in #(138)
bankruptcy by each District under the United States Bankruptcy Code, #139
Title 11 of the United States Code, As amended from time to time, or #140
any successor law. #(140)
Assignment Agreement #142
"Assignment Agreement" means that certain Assignment #(142)
Agreement by and between the Districts And the Trustee, dated as of #143
August 1, 1986. #(143)
-2- #14
94948.1.2704 .07 :1 #(14)
Business Day #145
"Business Day" means a day of the year on which banks in # (145)
New York, New York, in Los Angeles, California and in , #146 ,1
are not authorized or required to remain closed and on # (147)
which the New York Stock Exchange is open for trading. #148
Certificate of the representative District #150
"Certificate of the representative District" means an # (150)
instrument in writing signed by the District Manager of the District, #(150)
or by any other officer of each District duly authorized by the Board #151
of Directors of such District for that purpose, by the District #152
appointed by the other Districts as its representative by written #153
notice to the Trustee under this Trust Agreement and the Agreement #154
for Acquisition and Construction. Initially, County Sanitation #155
District No. 1 of Orange County, California is hereby appointed the #156
representative District. # (156)
Certificates #158
'Certificates" means the S , 000 certificates of #(158)
participation authorized hereby and at any time Outstanding hereunder #159
that are executed by the Trustee gnd authenticated and delivered by #160
the Paying Agent under and pursuant to Article II. #161
Financial Newspaper #163
"Financial Newspaper" means The Wall Street Journal or The #(16]r/
Bond Buyer, gr any other newspaper or journal publishing financial #164
news selected by the Trustee that is printed in the English language, #165
is customarily published gn each business day and is circulated in #166
New York, New York, and in Los Angeles, California. #167
Installment Payment Fund #169
"Installment Payment Fund" means the fund by that name #(169)
established in Section 3.02 hereof. #(169)
Installment Payments #171
"Installment Payments" means the installment payments of # (171)
principal gcheduled to be paid by each District under and pursuant to #172,1
the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction. # (173)
_3- #14
94948.1.2704.07:1 #(14)
Interest Payment Date #175
a./ "Interest Payment Date" means February 1 and August 1 of #(175)
each year (beginning in 1987) . # (175)
Interest Period #177
"Interest Period" means the fhe six-month period ending on #178
February 1 and August 1 of each year with respect to such Installment #179,3
Payments. #(180;
MIoody's #182
"Moody' s" means Moody' s Investors Service, Inc. , a corpo- #(182:
ration organized and existing under and pursuant to the laws of the #183,:
State of Delaware, and its successors and assigns. #185
Qpinion of Counsel #187
"Opinion of Counsel" means a written opinion of counsel of # (187;
recognized national standing in the field of law relating to munici- #188
pal bonds and the exemption from federal income taxation of the #189
interest thereon, appointed and paid by each District and satisfac- #190
tory to and approved by the Trustee Swho shall be under no liability #191,7
by reason of such approval) . # (192)
Qutstanding #194
"Outstanding' when used as of any particular time with #(194)
reference to Certificates, means Ssubject to the provisions of #195
Section 9.02) all Certificates except -- # (195)
jl) Certificates cancelled by the Trustee (upon #197
notice to the Paying Agent) or surrendered to the Paying #198
Agent for cancellation; #(198.
S2) Certificates paid or deemed to have been paid #200
within the meaning of ,jection 10.01; and #201
(3) Certificates in lieu of or in substitution for #203
which replacement Qertificates shall have been executed by #204
the Trustee and authenticated and delivered by the Paying #205
Agent hereunder. 1 (205)
Qvner 1207
"Owner" means the registered Owner of any Outstanding # (207)
Certificate. # (207)
-4- #14
94948 .1.2704 .07 :1 # (14 )
Paying Agent #209
"Paying Agent" means a trust company # (209
duly organized and existing under pnd by virtue of the laws of the $210
State of and having g principal corporate trust office in #211
, , or its successors or assigns. #212
Permitted Investments #214
"Permitted Investments" means any of the investments in #(214)
which the Districts may invest their funds under falifornia law. #215
Prepayment Date #217
"Prepayment Date" means [TO COME) # (217;
Prepayment Fund #219
"Prepayment Fund" means the fund by that name established # (219)
in Section 3 .03 hereof. #(219)
Purchaser #221
"Purchaser" means as underwriter and #(221)
purchaser of the Certificates under and pursuant to the @id Proposal #222,2
and Notice of Sale. # (223)
Record Date #225
"Record Date" means with respect to any Interest Payment # (225Y
Date for a Certificate the fifteenth day prior to each jnterest #226,2
Payment Date, or, if such day shall not be a Business Day, the next #229
preceding Business Day. # (229)
Reserve Fund #231
"Reserve Fund" means the fund by that name established in #(231;
the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction And in Section 3.04 #232
hereof. # (232)
RaP #234
"S&P" means Standard S Poor' s Corporation, a corporation #(234)
organized and existing finder and pursuant to the laws of the State of #235
New York, and its successors pnd assigns. #236
-5- #14
94948.1.2704.07 :1 # (14)
Trust Agreement #238
"Trust Agreement" means this Trust Agreement by and among # (238)
the Trustee, the Paying Agent, and each District, dated as of #239
August 1, 1986, as originally gxecuted and entered into and as it is #240
from time to time amended 2r supplemented in accordance herewith. #241
Xrustee #243
"Trustee" means, a national banking asso- # (243)
ciation duly organized and existing under and 12y virtue of the laws #244
of the United States of America and having a principal corporate #245
trust office in I , or any other bank sr trust #246
company which may at any time be substituted in its place as provided #247
in Section 8.02. # (247)
Britten Request #249
"Written Request" means an instrument in writing signed #(249)
constituting a Certificate of the representative District. #(249)
,£ECTION 1.02. Equal Security. In consideration of the #251
acceptance of the Certificates by the Owners, the Trust Agreement #252
shall be deemed to be and shall constitute a contract letween the #253
Trustee and the Owners to secure the full and final payment pf the #254
interest and principal and prepayment premiums, if any, to be made by #255
each District evidenced and represented by the Certificates, subject #(255)
.to the agreements, conditions, covenants and terms contained herein; #256
and all agreements, conditions, covenants and terms contained herein #257
ILequired to be observed or performed by or on behalf of the Trustee #258
shall be for the equal and proportionate benefit, protection and #259
security of all Owners without distinction, preference or priority as #260,2
to benefit, protection or security of any Certificates over any other #(261)
.Qertificates by reason of the number or date thereof or the time of #262
gxecution, authentication or delivery thereof or otherwise for any #263,:
cause whatsoever, except as expressly provided herein or therein. # (264)
ARTICLE II #265
TERNS AND CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATES #(265)
SECTION 2.01. Preparation of Certificates. The Trustee #267
is hereby authorized to prepare the Certificates in the aggregate #268
principal amount of dollars (# ) , gvidencing #269
and representing the aggregate principal amount of the Installment #(269)
payments and each evidencing and representing a direct and #270
proportionate interest in the Installment Payments and an interest on #271
the interest thereon. The Certificates shall be issued in the #272,2
-6- #14
94948.1.2704.07:1 #(14)
aggregate principal amount of $ and shall be #274
designated Certificates of Participation, County Sanitation Districts #275�
Nos. 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 and 14 of Orange County, California joint #276
Facilities Project". # (276)
f(ECTION 2.02. Denominations, Medium. Method and Place of #278
Payment and Dating of Certificates. The Certificates shall be pre- # (278)
pared in the form of fully registered Certificates in denominations #279
gf five thousand dollars ( $5,000) or any integral multiple thereof. #280,2
_The interest, principal and prepayment premiums, if any, evidenced #282
and represented by the Certificates shall be payable in lawful money #283
of the Qnited States of America. The interest evidenced and repre- #284,2
sented by the Certificates shall be payable gn their Interest Payment #286
Dates by check or draft mailed by the paying Agent to the respective #287
Owners thereof at their addresses as they appear, in the books #288
required to be kept by the Paying Agent pursuant fo the provisions of #289
Section 2.07 hereof on the Record Date with respect to each Interest #290
Payment Date. _The principal and prepayment premiums, if any, evi- #291
denced and represented by the Certificates shall be payable on #292
1, , or on prepayment prior thereto, upon surrender #293
thereof at the principal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent #294
in , #(294)
.The Certificates shall be dated the Interest Payment Date #295
immediately preceding the date of authentication thereof to which #296
interest has been paid and, if no interest has been paid, then #297
August 1, 1986. #(2971
§ECTION 2.03. Payment Dates. The interest evidenced and #299N%W
represented by the Certificates shall become due and payable on each #300
Interest Payment Date from £heir date to and including 1, #301
or on prepayment prior thereto, and shall evidence and repre- #302
sent in sum the interest becoming due and payable gn the Installment #303
Payments with respect to such Certificates on each Interest Payment #304
Date. The principal evidenced and represented by the Certificates #305,:
shall become due and payable on 11 , and shall avi- #307
dence and represent in sum the aggregate principal amount gf the #308
Installment Payments. # (308)
§ECTIOM 2.04. Form of Certificates. The Certificates and #310
the assignment to appear thereon shall be in qubstantially the forms #311
set forth in Appendix A hereto with appropriate or necessary inser- #312
tions, omissions and variations as permitted or required hereby. #313
;_ECTION 2.05. Execution and Authentication of Certificates. #315
The Certificates shall be executed by the Trustee by the manual or # (315)
facsimile signature of an authorized officer of the Trustee and #316
Authenticated by the manual signature of an authorized officer of the #317,3
Paying Agent. #(318)
-7- #14
94948 .1 .2704 .07 : 1 # (14`
$BCTIOB 2.06. Transfer and Exchange of Certificates. All #320
�..i Certificates are transferable and exchangeable by the Owner thereof, #(320)
in person or by such Owner's attorney duly authorized in writing, at #321
the principal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in #322
, , in the books required to be kept by the .#323
Paying Agent pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.07 hereof, upon #324
surrender of such Certificates Accompanied by delivery of a duly exe- #325
cuted written instrument of transfer or exchange in a form approved #326
by the Paying Agent. ghenever any Certificate or Certificates shall #327
be surrendered for transfer or exchange, the Trustee shall execute #328
and the Paying Agent shall authenticate and deliver a new Certificate #329
or Certificates of authorized denominations of the same payment date #330
representing the same Aggregate principal amount, except that the #331
Paying Agent shall require the payment by any Owner requesting such 0332
transfer or exchange of Any tax or other governmental charge required #333
to be paid with Lespect to such transfer or exchange. All #334,3
Certificates qurrendered pursuant to the provisions of this #336
Section 2.06 shall be cancelled by the Paying Agent (with notice to #337
the Trustee cf such cancellation) and shall not be redelivered. #338
The Paying Agent shall not be required to transfer or #339
gxchange any Certificate selected for prepayment in whole or in part #340 ,3
from and after the date of mailing the notice of prepayment of such #342
Certificate or portion thereof. # (342)
AECTIOB 2.07. Certificate Registration Books. The Paying #344
Agent will keep at its principal corporate trust office in #345
sufficient books for the iegistration of the #346
...i ownership, transfer and exchange of the Lertificates, which books #347
shall be available for inspection 12y the Trustee, each District And #348,3
its designated agent or any Owner or his agent duly authorized in #350
writing at reasonable hours and under seasonable conditions; and upon #351
presentation for such purpose the Paying Agent shall, under such rea- #352
sonable regulations as it may prescribe, register the ownership, #353
transfer or gxchange of the Certificates in such books as hereinabove #354
provided. The ownership of any Certificates may be proved by the #355,:
books required to be kept by the Paying Agent pursuant to the provi- #358
sions of this Section 2.07. #(358)
$ECTIOB 2.08. Temporary Certificates. The Certificates #360
may be initially delivered in temporary form gxchangeable for defini- #361
tive Certificates when ready for delivery, which temporary #362
Certificates shall be printed, lithographed or typewritten, shall be #363
of such denominations As may be determined by the Trustee, shall be #364
in fully I.egistered form and shall contain such reference to any of #365
the provisions hereof as may be appropriate. Fvery temporary #366,3
Certificate shall be executed by the Trustee and Authenticated and #368
delivered by the Paying Agent upon the same conditions and terms and #369
in substantially the same manner as definitive Certificates. if the #370,3
-8- #14
94948.1.2704.07 :1 # (14)
Trustee executes and the Paying Agent authenticates and delivers #372
temporary Certificates, the Trustee will prepare and execute and the #373*-"
Paying Agent will authenticate definitive Certificates without delay, #374,3
and in that case upon the demand of the owner of any temporary #376
Certificates such definitive Certificates shall be exchanged without #377
cost to such Owner for temporary Certificates at the principal corpo- #378
rate trust office of the Paying Agent in , , upon #379
surrender of such temporary Certificates, and until so exchanged such #380
temporary Certificates shall be entitled to the same benefit, protec- #381,3
tion and security hereunder as the definitive Certificates executed, #383
authenticated and delivered hereunder. All temporary Certificates #384
surrendered pursuant to the provisions of this Section 2.08 shall be #385
cancelled by the Paying Agent (with notice to the Trustee) and shall #386
not be redelivered. #387
,JECTION 2.09. Certificates Mutilated, Destroyed. Lost or #389
Stolen. If any Certificate shall become mutilated, the Trustee shall #390
execute and the Paying Agent shall authenticate and deliver a new #391
Certificate of like tenor and number in substitution for mutilated #392
Certificate, but only upon surrender to the Paying Agent of the muti- #393,2
lated Certificate, and every mutilated Certificate surrendered to the #395
Paying Agent shall be delivered by the Paying Agent to the Trustee #396
and shall be cancelled by the Trustee and shall not be redelivered. #397
;f any Certificate shall be destroyed, lost or stolen, evidence of #398
such destruction, loss or theft may be submitted to the Trustee and #399
to the Paying Agent, and if such evidence is satisfactory to the #400,4
Trustee and the Paying Agent, the Trustee shall execute and the #402
Paying Agent shall authenticate and deliver a new Certificate of like #403
tenor and number , in lieu of the destroyed, lost or stolen #4041*..,
Certificate. The Trustee and the Paying Agent may require payment of #405
a sum not exceeding the actual cost of preparing each new Certificate #406
executed, authenticated and delivered by then under this Section 2.09 #407
And of the expenses which may be incurred by them finder this #408,4
Section 2.09. Any replacement Certificate executed, Authenticated #410,4
and delivered under the provisions of this Section 2.09 in lieu of or #412
in substitution for any mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen #413
Certificate shall be equally and proportionately entitled to the ben- #414
efit, protection and security hereof with all other Certificates exe- #415
cuted, authenticated and delivered hereunder; and the Trustee and the #416,4
Paying Agent shall not be required to treat both the original #418
Certificate and any replacement Certificate as being Qutstanding for #419
the purpose of determining the principal amount of Certificates which #420
may be executed, authenticated and delivered hereunder or for the #421
purpose of determining any percentage of Certificates Outstanding #422
hereunder, but both the original and the replacement Certificate #423
shall be treated As one and the same. gotwithstanding any other pro- #424,4
visions of this Section 2.09, in lieu of the Trustee executing and #426
the Paying Agent authenticating and delivering a new Certificate for #427
a mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen Certificate which has been #428,4
-9- #14
94948.1.2704.07 :1 # (14)
called for prepayment or has matured, the Paying Agent May make #430
..i payment of the principal evidenced and represented by such mutilated, #431
destroyed, lost or stolen Certificate directly to the Owner thereof #432
under such regulations as it may prescribe. # (432)
ARTICLE III #433
PROCEEDS OF CERTIFICATES # (433)
SECTION 3.01. Delivery of Certificates. The Trustee is #435
hereby authorized to execute the Certificates and the Paying Agent is #436
hereby authorized to authenticate the Certificates and upon receipt #437
of the proceeds of sale thereof deliver the Certificates to the immne- # (437)
diate purchasers pursuant to and upon receipt of a Written Request. #438, �
BECTION 3.02. Deposit of Proceeds of Certificates. The #441
proceeds received from the sale of the Certificates (including #442
accrued interest) shall be deposited by the Trustee #443 ,4
JA) in the Installment Fund (to be applied to the payment #445
of accrued and capitalized interest) to the Installment Payment #446
Account of each District such amount as set forth in Appendix B #447
hereto; # (447)
(B) in the Reserve Fund, the Reserve Requirement for each #448
District shall be deposited to the Reserve Account of each District, #449
such smounts as set forth in Appendix B hereto; and #450
(C) the balance of the proceeds of the Certificates in each 4451
District' s Acquisition Account in the Installment Fund, such an # (451)
amount as set forth in Appendix B hereto. #452
.SECTION 3.03. Use of Money in the Acquisition Fund. #454
Amounts in each Acquisition Account will be disbursed by the Trustee # (454.
to pay the District's share of the cost to complete acquisition, con- #455
struction and installation of the related District's interest in the #456
Project. All money in the Acquisition Fund shall be held by the # (456;
.Trustee in trust and shall be applied by the Trustee for the payment #457 ,,
of each District's costs of the Acquisition of the Project and the #459
expenses incidental thereto (including Teimbursement to each District #460
for any such costs or expenses theretofore paid by it for the #461
Project) , including the payment of the costs of the execution and #462
delivery of the Certificates and the initial fees and gxpenses of the #463 ,4
Trustee in connection therewith. # (464)
Before any payment is made from the Acquisition Accounts in #465
the Acquisition Fund by the Trustee, there shall be filed with the #466
-10- #14
94948.1.2704.07 :1 4 (14)
Trustee A Written Request showing with respect to each payment of i467
money to be made for the Acquisition of the Project: i470 ,./
(a) the name of the person to whom payment is 1472
due; 4 (472)
(b) the amount of money to be paid; i474
(c) the purpose for which the obligation to be i476
paid was incurred; and i (476)
(d) the particular items to be paid for. i478
Each such Written Request shall state and shall be suffi- 4480 ,1
cient evidence to the Trustee: Y (481:
(a) that the District delivering such Written #483
Request is authorized to act as agent for the ether i484
Districts with respect to the matter described in such i(484)
Written Request; i485
(b) that an obligation in the stated amount has 4487
been properly incurred under and pursuant to the t488
Agreement for Acquisition and Construction and that i (488)
each such obligation is a proper charge against the 4489
Acquisition Fund; and t(489)
(c) that there has not been filed with or served i491
upon any District a stop notice or any other notice of i492
any lien, right to lien or attachment upon, or claim i493
affecting the right to receive payment of, any of the 4(493)
money payable to the person named in such Written 5494
Request which has not been released or will not be i495
released with the payment of such obligation, other i (495)
than materialmen' s or mechanics' liens accruing by i496
mere operation of law. t (496:
.Upon receipt of each such Written Request, the Trustee 4498
shall, so long as each District is not then in default under the i499
Agreement for Acquisition and Construction pr hereunder, pay the i500
amount set forth therein as directed by the terms thereof, except 4501
that the Trustee need not make any such payment if it has received a 4502
stop notice or any other notice of any lien, right to lien or attach- i (502)
ment upon, or claim affecting the right to receive payment of, any of i503
the money to be so paid which has not been released or will not be 5504
released simultaneously with such payment, other than materialmen's i505
or mechanics' liens accruing by mere pperation of law or a notice i506
from any District stating that such District is not authorized to act 4507
-11- 414
94948.1.2704 .07 :1 t (14)
as agent for the other Districts with respect to the matter described #508
in such Written Request. #(508)
When the Acquisition of the Project has been completed, #509
District No. 1 (as agent of the other Districts) or its quccessor #510
shall deliver a Certificate to the Trustee stating the fact and date #511
of the completion of such Acquisition and stating that all the costs #512
of such Acquisition and the expenses incidental thereto have been the #513
principal amount of the Certificates less specified claims which are # (513)
subject to dispute and for which a retention in the Acquisition Fund #514
is to be maintained in the full Amount of such claims until such dis- #515
pute is resolved) . Qpon the receipt of such certificate, the Trustee #516
shall transfer any Remaining balance in the Acquisition Fund (but #517
less the amount of any such Fetention) to the Prepayment Fund, for #518
the prepayment of Certificates in accordance yith Article IV hereof. #519
ARTICLE IV #520
PREPAYMENT (REDEMPTION) OF CERTIFICATES #(520)
$ECTION 4.01. Redemption. #521
.is) The Certificates are subject to mandatory redemption in #523
whole or in part from j:ime to time (but not in a total redemption #524
amount of less than $20,000 at any 2ne time) , in inverse order of #525
maturity and by lot within a maturity, on any Payment Date, without #526
premium, at the principal amount, together with accrued interest to #527
the date fixed for redemption from the Net Proceeds of insurance 2r #528
condemnation or the proceeds of sale of the Project deposited with # (528)
the Trustee in the Installment Payment Account pursuant to the provi- #529
sions of the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction. #530
jb) In addition to redemption pursuant to subsection (a) #532
hereof, the Certificates @aturing on and after 1, _, #533
are subject to redemption in whole or in part from time to time (but #534
not in a total redemption amount of less than $20,000 At any one #535
time) in inverse order of maturity and by lot within a maturity 2n #536
any Payment Date on or after 1, _, at the principal #(536)
amount with Respect thereto, together with the premium set forth #537
below (expressed as a percentage of the total amount redeemed) , and #538
accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption from the proceeds #539
of optional prepayments of Installment Payments made by a District #540
pursuant to the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction: #(540)
DATE OF REDEMPTION PREMIUM #543
-12- #14
94948 .1.2704.07 :1 # (14)
(c) Aedemppion by lot shall be in such manner as the 4546
Trustee shall determine; provided, however, that the portion of any 45471*m/
Certificate to be redeemed shall be in the principal amount of $5,000 l548
or any multiple thereof, and that in selecting portions of i549
Certificates for redemption, the Trustee shall treat each such t (549)
.Certificate as representing that number of Certificates which is 4550
obtained by dividing the principal amount with respect to such 4551
Certificate by $5,000. f(551)
jd) Upon redemption pursuant to this Section, the Trustee 4553
shall provide the appropriate District with a revised schedule of 4554
Installment Payments which schedule shall take into account guch 4555
redemption and shall be and become for all purposes thereafter a ! (555)
replacement to the Installment Payments set forth in Appendix A of 4(555)
the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction. 4556
fiECTION 4.02. Selection of Certificates for Prepayment. 4557
(a) Whenever less than all the Outstanding Certificates are 4559
to be prepaid on any one $ate, the Trustee shall select the 4560
Certificates to be prepaid in whole or in part from the Outstanding 4561
Certificates first from any Certificates designated by each District 4562,`
for prepayment (on a proportionate basis allocating a proportionate 4(563)
amount to each installment of Installment Payments) and then by lot 4564
in any Kanner that the Trustee deems fair, and the Trustee shall 4565
promptly notify the Trustee, the Paying Agent, and each District in 4566
writing of the numbers of the Certificates so selected for prepayment 4567
in whole or in part on such date. i(56'
¢ECTION 4.03. Notice of Prepayment. Notice of prepayment 4569
shall be mailed, first class postage prepaid, to the tespective 4570
Owners of any Certificates designated for prepayment in whole or in 4571
part at their address appearing in the books required to be kept by 4572
the Paying Agent pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.07 not less #573
than fifteen (15) nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the prepay- 4574
ment date. Each notice of prepayment shall atate the prepayment 4575
date, the prepayment place and the prepayment price, shall designate 4 (575.
the serial numbers of the Certificates to be prepaid by giving the 4576
individual number Qf each Certificate or by stating that all 4577
Certificates between two stated numbers, both inclusive, have been #578
called for prepayment, shall (in the case of any Certificate called i579
for prepayment in part only) state the portion of the principal 4(579)
amount evidenced and represented thereby which is to be prepaid, 4580
shall gtate that the interest evidenced and designated for prepayment 4581
shall cease to accrue from and after such prepayment date and that on t582
such prepayment date there will become due and payable on each of the i583
Certificates or portions thereof designated for prepayment shall 4584
cease to accrue from and after such prepayment date and that sn such 4585
prepayment date there will become due and payable on each of the 4(585)
-13- 414
94948 .1 . 2704 .07 :1 4(14)
`/
Certificates 4r portions thereof designated for prepayment the i586
prepayment price evidenced and X_eprese nted thereby. Notice with i587 ,5
respect to any Certificate shall be deemed given if such notice is i589
provided to the Owner of such Certificate at the time of such i (589)
notice. i (589)
In case of the prepayment as permitted therein of all the i590
Certificates then Outstanding, the notice of prepayment need not i591
specify the serial numbers of the Certificates to be prepaid. i (591 )
The Trustee shall give notice of prepayment of any i592
Certificates to be prepaid opon receipt of a Written Request (which i593
request shall be given to the Trustee at least thirty (30) days prior i594
to the date fixed for prepayment) , but only after and to the extent i595
that available funds are on deposit in the Prepayment Fund in an i596
amount which the Trustee shall have determined is or will be on the i597 ,5
date of prepayment sufficient to provide for the payment of the pre- 6599 ,6
payment price evidenced and represented by all Certificates to be 9(600)
prepaid together with the estimated expense of giving such notice 9601
provided that with tespect to moneys transferred to the Prepayment 6602
Fund pursuant to Section 3 .03 hereof, the Trustee shall give notice i603
of any Certificates to be prepaid upon the transfer of such moneys to 6604
such fund, and the prepayment date shall be the next Interest Payment i605
Date at least fifteen (15) days after such notice; provided, however i606
that any failure to give such notice shall not Affect the validity of i607
such prepayment. i (607)
..r Notice shall be given to Moody' s and S&P upon the prepay- i608
ment of the Certificates as a whole. i609
SECTION 4.04. Partial Prepayment of Certificates. Upon i611
surrender of any Certificate prepaid in part only, the Trustee shall i612
execute and the Paying Agent shall authenticate and deliver to the i613
Owner thereof a new Certificate or Certificates equal to the unpre- i614
paid principal amount of the Certificate surrendered. The Owner of i615
any Certificate prepaid in part only may, in lieu of surrendering i616
such Certificate for a new Certificate or _Certificates, endorse on i617
the reverse of his Certificate a notation of such partial prepayment i618
in such form as may be satisfactory to the Paying Agent and under i619
such conditions as the Paying Agent may approve, which such partial i620
prepayment shall be valid upon payment of the amount required thereby i621
to be paid to such Owner; and each District And the Corporation and i622
the Trustee and the Paying Agent shall be released and discharged i623
from all liability to the extent of such prepayment, irrespective of i624
whether such endorsement shall or shall not have been made upon the i625
reverse of such Certificate by such endorsement. i626
.4BCTION 4.05. Effect of Prepayment. I f n o t i c e o f i628
prepayment has been duly given as aforesaid and funds for the payment i629
-14- i14
94948.1.2704.07 :1 i (14)
of the prepayment price on the Certificates to be prepaid are held by #63C
the Trustee on the designated prepayment date, then on the prepayment #631�
date designated in such notice the Certificates so called for prepay- #632
ment shall become payable at the prepayment price evidenced and rep- #633
resented thereby specified in such notice; and from and after the #634
date so designated interest evidenced and represented by the # (634:
Certificates so called for prepayment shall cease to accrue, such #635
Certificates shall cease to be entitled to any benefit, protection or #636,f
security hereunder and the Owners of such Certificates shall have no #638
rights in respect thereof except to receive payment of the prepayment #639
price evidenced and represented thereby. The Paying Agent shall, #640
upon surrender for payment of any of the Certificates to be prepaid #641
on their prepayment dates, pay such Certificates at the prepayment #642
price evidenced and represented thereby. 4 (642
All Certificates prepaid in whole or in part pursuant to #643
the provisions of this article shall be cancelled by the Paying #644
Agent, who shall give notice of such cancellation to the Trustee, and #645
shall not be redelivered. #646
ARTICLE V #647
RESERVE ACCOUNTS, INSTALLMENT PAYMENT ACCOUNTS #(647)
AND CERTIFICATE PAYMENT ACCOUNT # (647:
g.ECTION 5.01. Reserve Accounts. The Trustee hereby agrees #649
to establish and maintain so long as any Certificates are Outstanding #650
the Reserve Fund and the accounts therein and to hold such fund and #651�
such accounts in trust in accordance with this Section and # (651;
Section 4 .02 of the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction. #652
Within the Reserve Fund the Trustee shall maintain separate #653
Reserve Accounts for each District each of which is required to be #654
funded initially from proceeds of the Certificates in the amount of #655
its Reserve Requirement. Amounts in the Reserve Account of each #656 ,
District are to be used only for the payment of such District' s #658
Installment Payments and interest accrued thereon to the extent that # (658
such District' s Installment Payment Account is insufficient #659
therefor. Qne District's Reserve Account is not available to make up #660
a deficiency in the Installment Payment Account of any other #661
District. # (661)
If on any due date moneys on hand in a District' s #662
Installment Payment Account do not equal such District's Installment #663
Payment required to be deposited with the Trustee on such due date, #664
the Trustee shall immediately transfer moneys from such District' s #665
Reserve Account to such District' s Installment Payment Account to #666
make up such deficiency. 4pon receipt of delinquent Installment #667
-15- #14
94948.1.2704.07 :1 4 (14'
Payments from such District, Auch District's Reserve Account shall be #668
�../ replenished. #(668)
at any time that the balance in a District' s Reserve #669
Account and Installment Payment Account equal all Installment #670
Payments remaining due Jay such District under the Agreement for #671
Acquisition and Construction, tihe Trustee shall transfer all amounts #672
in such Reserve Account to such installment Payment Account to be #673
applied to the payment of such Installment payments as they become #674
due and payable and such District shall be deemed to have paid all #675
Installment Payments due under the Agreement for Acquisition And #676
Construction. # (676)
@BCTION 5.02. Installment Payment Accounts. The Trustee #678
will deposit in each District Installment Payment Account .411 #679
Installment Payments received from such District, proceeds of busi- # (679)
ness interruption insurance maintained by such District and any other #680
amounts required by the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction or #681
the Trust Agreement. #682
from proceeds of the sale of the Certificates, the Trustee #683
will deposit in the Capitalized Interest Subaccount of each #684
District' s Installment Payment Account the amount of such District's #685
Funded Interest Deposit. # (685)
In the event that on a due date there is not on deposit in #686
a District installment Payment Account an amount (excluding earnings #687
during such pistrict' s Project acquisition period) equal to such #688
a./ Installment Payment obligation payable on such due date, then the #689
Trustee shall immediately transfer from such District' s Reserve #690
Account to its Installment Payment Account an amount necessary to #691
increase the balance sf the Installment Payment Account to an amount #692
equal to such Installment Payment obligation. #693
The Trustee will withdraw from each District's Installment #694
Payment Account Jincluding it Capitalized Interest Subaccount, as #695
appropriate) on each Payment Date an amount equal to the Installment #696
Payments due from that District qn the due date preceding such #697
Payment Date. All such sums withdrawn from the Installment Payment #698
Accounts will be deposited in the Certificate Payment Account. #699
JECTION 5.03. Certificate Payment Account. The Trustee #701
will withdraw from the Certificate Payment Account on each payment #702
Date an amount equal to the interest and principal due with respect #703
to the Certificates on that date and will apply the same to the pay- #704
ment of such principal and interest to the Owners. If on any Payment #705
Date the balance in the Certificate Payment Account is less than the #706
amount of principal and interest due to the Owners, the Trustee shall #707
apply the money on hand in the Certificate Payment Account to the #708
-16- #14
94948.1 .2704. 07 :1 # (14)
payment of interest in Installment Payments of the District from #709
whose Installment Payment Accounts such moneys were Withdrawn (but #710`%
only to the extent of such withdrawals) and, with respect to each #711
such District' s Installment Payments, first to the payment of inter- #712
est past due, pro rate if necessary, and second to the payment of # (712)
principal past due, pro rate, if necessary. #713
ARTICLE VI #714
COVENANTS # (714)
SECTION 6.01. Compliance with Trust Agreement. The #716
Trustee will not execute and the Paying Agent will not authenticate #717
or deliver any Certificates in any manner Other than in accordance #718
with the provisions hereof, and each District will not suffer or #719
permit any default by them to occur hereunder, but will faithfully #720
comply with, keep, observe and perform all the agreements, condi- #721
tions, covenants and terms hereof required to be complied with, kept, #722
observed and performed by them. #723
.SECTION 6.02. Compliance with Agreement for Acquisition and #725
Construction. The Districts will faithfully comply with, keep, #726
observe and perform all the agreements, conditions, covenants and #727
terms contained in the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction #(727)
required to be complied with, kept, observed and performed by them #728,7
and, together with the Trustee, will enforce the Agreement for #730
Acquisition and Construction against the other party thereto in #731�
accordance with its terms. #(73
.The Districts will not alter, amend or modify the Agreement #732,7
for Acquisition and Construction without the prior Written consent of #734
the Trustee, Which consent shall be given by the Trustee only (i) if, #735
in the opinion of the Trustee (which opinion may, in the piscretion #736,7
of the Trustee, be based upon an Opinion of Counsel cr a Certificate #738
of the representative District) , such alterations, amendments gr mod- #739
ifications will not result in any material impairment of the security #740
given or intended to be given for the payment of the Installment #741
Payments, or (ii) if the Trustee first obtains the written consents #742
of the Owners of at least sixty per cent 160%) in aggregate principal #743
amount of the Certificates then Qutstanding to such alterations, #744
amendments or modifications. # (744)
SECTION 6.03. Observance of Laws and Regulations. The #746
Districts, the Trustee and paying Agent will faithfully comply with, #747
keep, observe and perform all valid and lawful obligations or regula- #748
tions now or hereafter imposed on them by contract, or prescribed by #749
any law of the United States of America or of the State of California #750,7
or of the State of New York, or by any officer, hoard or commission #752
-17- #14
94948.1.2704.07 :1 # 414'
having jurisdiction or control, as a 2ondition of the continued #753
a/ enjoyment of each and every franchise, right or privilege now owned #754
or hereafter acquired by them, including their right to exist and #755
carry on their respective businesses, to the end that such fran- #756
chises, rights and privileges shall be maintained and preserved and #757
shall not become abandoned, forfeited or in any manner impaired. #758
JECTION 6.04. Other Liens. The Districts will keep the #760
Project and all parts thereof Iree from judgments and materialmen' s #761
and mechanics' liens and free from all claims, demands, encumbrances #762
and other liens of whatever nature or character, and free from any #763
claim or liability which, in the judgment of the Trustee (and its #764,7
determination thereof shall be final) , might embarrass or hamper each #766
District in conducting its business or utilizing the Project, and the #767
Trustee at its option (after first giving each District ten (10) #768
days' written notice to comply therewith and failure to each District #769
to so comply within such ten-day period, a gopy of which shall be #770
sent to the Standby Purchaser) may defend against any ,and all actions #771
or proceedings in which the validity hereof is pr might be ques- #772
tioned, or may pay or compromise any claim or .4emand asserted in any #773
such actions or proceedings; provided, however, that, in defending #774
against any such actions or proceedings or in paying or compromising #775
any such glaims or demands, the Trustee shall not in any event be #776
deemed to have waived or released each District from liability for or #777
on account of any of its agreements and covenants contained herein, #778,7
or from its liability hereunder to defend the validity hereof and to #780
perform such agreements and covenants. # (780)
So long as any Certificates are Outstanding, no pistrict #781,7
will create or suffer to be treated any pledge of or lien on the #783
Installment Payments 2ther than as permitted hereunder or under the #784
Agreement for Acquisition and Construction of Joint Facilities. #785
$BCTION 6.05. Prosecution and Defense of Suits. The #787
Districts will promptly, upon request of the Trustee, the Paying #788
Agent or any Owner, take such action from time to time as may be nec- #789
essary or proper to remedy or cure any cloud upon or defect in the #790
title to the Project or any part thereof, whether now existing or #791
hereafter developing, gill prosecute all actions, suits or other pro- #792
ceedings as may he appropriate for such purpose and will indemnify #793
and save the Trustee, the Paying Agent and every Owner harmless from #794,7
all cost, damage, expense or loss, including attorneys' fees, which #796
they or any of them may incur by reason 2f any such cloud, defect, #797
action, suit or other proceeding. #(797)
The Districts will defend against every action, suit or #798
other proceeding at any time brought against the Trustee or the #799
Paying Agent or any Owner upon any claim arising out of the receipt, #800,8
deposit or disbursement of any of the Installment Payments 2r #802
-18- 114
94948 .1 .2704 .07 :1 # (14)
involving the rights of the Trustee or the Paying Agent or any Owner #803
hereunder; provided, however, that the Trustee or the Paying Agent or #804'%�
any Owner at its or his Qlection may, at the cost of each District, #805
appear in and defend any such action, suit or other proceeding. The #806
Districts will indemnify and hold harmless the Trustee, the Paying #807
Agent and the Owners against any and all liability claimed on #808
assented by any person arising out of any such receipt, deposit on #809
disbursement, and will indemnity and hold harmless, the Trustee, the #810
Paying Agent and the Owners against any attorneys' fees or other # (810)
expenses which any of them may incur in connection with any litiga- #811
tion or otherwise in ponnection with the foregoing to which any of #812
them may become a party in order to enforce their rights hereunder or #813
under the certificates, provided that such litigation shall be con- #814
cluded favorably to such parties' contentions therein. #815
.JBCTION 6.06. Accounting Records and Statements. The #817
Trustee will keep proper accounting records in Which complete and #818
correct entries shall be made of all transactions relating to the #819
receipt, deposit and disbursement pf the Installment Payments, and #820
such accounting records shall he available for inspection by each #821
District pr any Owner or his agent duly authorized in writing at tea- #822,8
sonable hours and under reasonable conditions. Not later than the #824
fifteenth day of each month, commencing and continuing so #825
long as any Certificates are Outstanding, the Trustee will furnish to #826
each District and any goner who may so request (at the expense of #827
such Owner) a complete statement covering the receipts, deposits and #828
disbursements of the Installment Payments for the preceding qne-month #829,8
period. # (83(
@BCTION 6.07. Recordation and Filing. The City will file, #832
record, register, renew, refile and record all such documents, #833
including financing statements Sor continuation statements in connec- #834
tion therewith) , as may be required by law in order to maintain the #835
Agreement for Acquisition and Construction and the Assignment #836
Agreement and the Trust Agreement at all times as a security interest #837
in the Installment Payments, all in such manner, at such times and in #838,1
such places as may be required and to the extent permitted by law in #840
order to fully perfect, preserve and protect the security of the #841
Owners and the rights and gecurity interests of the Trustee, and the #842
Trustee may do Whatever it deems necessary or reasonably required in #843
order to perfect and continue the lien of the Agreement for #844
Acquisition and Construction, the Assignment Agreement and hereof. #845
fiRCTION 6.08. Further Assurances. whenever and so often #847
as requested to do so by the Trustee or any Owner each District will #848
promptly execute and deliver or cause to be executed and delivered #849,8
all such other and further assurances, documents pr instruments and #851
promptly do or cause to be done all such ether and further things as #852
may be necessary or reasonably Lequired in order to further and more #853
-19- #14
94948.1.2704.07 :1 # (14)
fully vest in the Trustee and the Owners all advantages, benefits, # (853)
interests, powers, privileges and rights conferred or intended to be #854,8
conferred upon them by the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction #(855)
or the Assignment Agreement. #856
ARTICLE VII #857
DEFAULT AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY # (857)
SECTION 7.01. Action on Default or Acceleration. If a n #859
Event of Default under Section 7.01 of the Agreement for Acquisition #(859)
and Construction shall happen, then such Event of Default shall con- #860,8
stitute a default or acceleration event hereunder, and in each and #862
every such case during the continuance of such Event of Default the #863
Trustee or the Qwners of not less than a majority in aggregate prin- #864
cipal amount represented by the Certificates at the time Qutstanding #865,6
and the Trustee shall, upon notice in writing to each District and #867
the Paying Agent, exercise the remedies provided to the other #868,8
Districts in Section 7 .01 of the Agreement for Acquisition and # (869)
Construction. # (869)
.In the event the entire principal amount 2f the unpaid #870,8
Installment Payments of a District and the accrued interest thereon #872
shall be declared due and payable pursuant to jection 7.01 of the #873
Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, the Trustee shall declare #874
the principal of and interest on a proportionate amount of the # (874)
Certificates immediately due and payable and such principal and #875,8
interest shall thereupon be due and payable immediately; Provided #877
that, with respect to an Event of Default described in Section #878
7.01 (c) of the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, Ro action #879
by the Trustee shall be necessary to accelerate the maturity of a #880
proportionate amount of the Certificates yhich shall in such event be #881
automatically accelerated. #(881)
@ECTION 7.02, Other Remedies of the Trustee. The Trustee #883
shall have the right # (883)
_Ca) by mandamus or other action or proceeding or #885
guit at law or in equity to enforce its rights against #886
the defaulting District or any councilmember, officer #887
or employee thereof, and to compel the defaulting #888
District 2r any such councilmember , officer or #889
employee to perform or carry out its or his duties #890
under law and the agreements and covenants required to #891
be performed by it or him contained herein; #892
-20- #14
94948.1 .2704 .07 :1 # (14)
Sb) by suit in equity to enjoin any acts or #894v
things ghich are unlawful or violate the rights of the #895
Trustee; or # (895)
Sc) by suit in equity upon the happening of any #897
default hereunder to require the defaulting District #898
and its council members, officers and employees to #899
.Account as the trustee of an express trust. #900
SECTION 7.03. Non waiver. A waiver of any default or #902
breach of duty or contract by the Trustee' shall not affect any subse- #903
quent default or breach of duty or contract or impair any rights or #904 ,9
remedies on any such subsequent default or breach of duty or #906
contract. No delay or omission by the Trustee to Axercise any right #907
or remedy accruing upon any default or breach of duty or contract #908
shall impair any such right or Ahall be construed to be a waiver of #909
any such default or ¢reach of duty or contract or an acquiescence #910
therein, and Avery right or remedy conferred upon the Trustee by law #911
or by this article may be enforced and exercised from time to time #912,9
and as often as shall be deemed expedient by the Trustee. #914
If any action, proceeding or suit to enforce any Light or #915,9
to exercise any remedy is abandoned or determined Adversely to the #917
Trustee, the Trustee Ind the defaulting District shall be restored to #918
their former positions, rights and remedies as if such action, pro- #919,9
ceeding or suit had not been brought or taken. #(9201
4ECTION 7.04. Remedies Not Exclusive. No remedy herein #922�
conferred upon or reserved to the Trustee is intended to be exclusive #923,9
of any other remedy, and each such remedy shall be cumulative and #925
shall be in Addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or #926
hereafter existing in law or in equity or by statute or otherwise and #927,9
may be exercised without exhausting and without Legard to any other #929
remedy conferred by any law. #(929)
SECTION 7.05. No Liability by each District to the Owners. #931
Except for the payment when due of the Installment Payments and the # (931:
interest thereon, and the performance of the other agreements and #932
covenants required to be performed by it contained in the Agreement #933,9
for Acquisition and Construction or herein, each District shall not #(934)
have any obligation or liability to the Owners with respect to the #935,9
Trust Agreement or the preparation, execution, authentication, deliv- #937
ery or transfer of the Certificates or the disbursement of the #938
Installment Payments and the interest thereon, by the Trustee gr the #939
Paying Agent, or with respect to the performance by the Trustee or #940
the Paying Agent of any right or obligation Lequired to be performed #941
by it contained herein. # (941)
-21- #14
94948.1 . 2704 .07 :1 # (14 ,0,
fiECTION 7.06. No Liability by the Trustee to the Owners. #943
Except as expressly provided in the Trust Agreement, the Trustee #(943)
shall not have any obligation or liability to the Owners with Fespect #944,9
to the payment when due of the Installment Payments and the interest #(945)
thereon Jay each District, or with respect to the performance by each #946
District 2f the other agreements and covenants required to be per- #947
formed lay it contained in the Agreement for Acquisition and #948
Construction or herein. #(948)
ARTICLE VIII #950
THE TRUSTEE # (950)
.JECTION 8.01. Employment of the Trustee. The Districts #952
hereby appoint and employ Jthe Trustee to receive, deposit and dis- #953
burse the Installment 2ayments and the interest thereon , to prepare, #954
execute, deliver and transfer the -Certificates and to perform the #955
other functions contained in this Trust Agreement; all in the manner #956
provided herein and subject to the gonditions and terms hereof. By #957
executing and delivering the Trust Agreement, the Trustee accepts the #958
appointment and Cmployment hereinabove referred to and accepts the #959
rights and obligations of the Trustee provided herein, subject to the #960
gonditions and terms hereof. notwithstanding anything contained in #961,9
the Trust Agreement, the Trustee shall be required to perform only #963
such duties as are expressly set forth in the Trust Agreement. #964
She Trustee does not assume any responsibility for the gor- #965,9
rectness of recitables of fact herein or in the Certificates. The #967
Trustee shall not be deemed to make any representations as to the #968
validity of this Trust Agreement, any supplemental Trust Agreement or #969
of any Certificates or in respect of the security afforded by this #970
Agreement. # (970)
2ECTION 8.02. Removal and Resignation of the Trustee. #972
The Districts, or the Owners of a majority in aggregate principal #973
amount represented by Certificates at the time outstanding, may at #974
any time remove the Trustee initially a party hereto and any succes- #975
sor thereto by giving written notice of such removal to the Trustee #976
and ¢y giving notice by mail of such removal to all Owners of #977
-Certificates, Moody' s, SAP and the Trustee initially a party hereto #978,9
and any successor thereto may at any time resign by giving written #980
notice of such resignation to each District, Moody's and S&P and by #981,9
giving notice by mail of such resignation to all Qwners of #983
Certificates. Upon giving any such notice of removal 2r upon receiv- #984
ing any such notice or resignation, the Districts Ahall promptly #985
appoint a successor Trustee by an instrument in writing; provided, #986
that in the event the Qistricts do not appoint a successor Trustee #987
-22- #14
94948.1.2704.07 :1 #(14)
githin sixty (60) days following the giving of any such notice Qf #988.
removal or the receipt of any such notice of resignation, the removed #990 `/
or resigning Trustee may petition any appropriate court having juris- #991
diction to appoint a successor Trustee. Any successor Trustee shall #992
be a bank or trust company doing ¢usiness and having a principal cor- #993
porate trust office in San Francisco Qr Los Angeles, California, or #994
shall be a national banking organization, having a combined capital #(994)
(exclusive of ¢orrowed capital) and surplus of at least one hundred #995
million .4ollars ($100,000,000) subject to supervision or examination #996
by state or national authorities. If such bank or trust company pub- #997,9
lishes a report of condition at least annually, pursuant to law or to #999
the requirements of any supervising or examining authority above #1000
referred to, then for the purposes of this Section 8.02 the combined #1001
capital and surplus Qf such bank or trust company shall be deemed to #1002
be its combined capital and surplus as set forth in its most recent #1003
feport of condition so published. #1004
She Districts shall give Moody's and S&P written notice of #1005,
the appointment of any successor Trustee. # (1006
&ny removal or resignation of a Trustee and appointment of #1007
A successor Trustee shall become effective only upon acceptance 2f #1008,
appointment by the successor Trustee. # (1009
.EBCTIO9 8.03. Compensation and Indei ification of the #1011
Trustee. The Districts shall from time to time, subject to any # (1011
Agreement then in effect with the Trustee, pay the Trustee compensa- #1012,
tion for its services and reimburse the Trustee for all its advances #101/
and expenditures hereunder, including but not limited to advances to #101N✓
and fees and expenses of Accountants, agents appraisers, consultants, #1016
counsel or Qther experts employed by it in the exercise and per- #1017
formance Qf its rights and obligations hereunder: provided that the #1018,
Trustee shall not have any lien for such compensation Qr reimburse- #1020
ment against any moneys held by it in any of the funds established #1021
hereunder or under the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction. #(1021
.The Trustee may take whatever legal Actions are lawfully available to #1022,
it directly against each District. #(1023
She Districts shall indemnify and hold harmless the Trustee #1024
to the extent and in the amounts provided by the Laws of the State of #1025,
California from and against all claims, advances, damages And losses, #1027
including legal fees and expenses, arising out Qf (i) the condition, #1028
management, maintenance or use of Qr from any work or thing done in #1029
connection with the Project py each District, (ii) any act of negli- #1030
gence of each District or of Any of its agents, contractors, employ- #1031
ees, invitees, licensees, Officers or servants in connection with the #1032
Project, iiii) the authorization of payment of any costs of the #1033
Project ¢y each District, or (iv) arising out of or in connection 91034
with the Acceptance or administration of the trust or the performance #1035
_23- #14
94948.1 . 2704 .07 :1 i (14)
of its Auties under the Trust Agreement : provided that no #1036
a./ indemnification will be made for willful misconduct, gross negligence #1037
or breach of an Obligation hereunder by the Trustee. #1038
The Trustee shall be under no obligation or duty to perform #1039
any act yhich would involve it in any expense or liability or to #1040
institute or defend any suit in respect hereof, or to advance any of # (104C
its own moneys, unless properly indemnified to its satisfaction. The #1041,
immunities, exceptions and indemnifications from liability of the # (1042
Trustee under this Agreement Ahall extend to its directors, officers, #1043
employees and agents. # (1042
The Trustee' s rights to payment of fees, reimbursement of #1044
expenses and indemnification shall survive payment or defeasance of #(1044
the certificates and removal or resignation of the Trustee. #1045
IJNCTION 8,04, Protection of the Trustee. The Districts #1047
shall protect the Trustee and the Trustee shall incur no liability #1048
for acting or proceeding with due care under the circumstances upon #1049
any affidavit, certificate, consent, notice, request, requisition, #1050
resolution, statement, telegram voucher, waiver or other paper or #1051
document which it shall reasonably believe to be genuine and to have #1052
been adopted, Axecuted or delivered by the proper party or pursuant #1053
to Any of the provisions hereof. The Trustee shall be finder the duty #1054,
to make a reasonable investigation or inquiry as to Any statements #1057
contained or matters referred to in any Auch instrument. The Trustee #1058,
may consult with counsel, who may be counsel to The Districts, with #1060
regard to legal questions and the opinion of such counsel shall ¢e #1061,
full and complete authorization and protection in respect to any #1063
action taken or suffered by it hereunder after reasonable investiga- # (1063
tion }n accordance therewith. #1064
The Trustee shall not be responsible for the sufficiency 2f #1065,
the Installment Payments, or of the assignment made to it by the #1067
Assignment Agreement of all rights to receive the Installment #1068
Payments and the interest thereon. #(1061
ghenever in the administration of its rights and Qbliga- 01069,
tions hereunder the Trustee shall deem it necessary sr desirable that #1071
a matter be proved or established prior to taking or suffering any #1072
action hereunder, such matter junless other evidence in respect #1073
thereof be herein specifically prescribed) may be deemed to be con- #1074
clusively proved and established by a Certificate of District No. 1, #1075
and such certificate shall be full warrant to the Trustee for Any fl076,
action taken or suffered under the provisions hereof upon the faith #1078
thereof, but in its discretion the Trustee may, in Lieu thereof, #1079
accept other evidence of such matter sr may require such additional #1080
evidence as to it may seem reasonable. #1081
-24- #14
94948.1.2704.07:1 #(14)
The Trustee may buy, sell, own, hold and deal in the #108,
Certificates and may join in any action which Any Owner may be enti- #108&v/
tled to take with like effect as if the Trustee were not a party 11085
hereto. The Trustee, either as principal or agent, may also engage #1086
in or be interested in any financial or other transaction with the #1087
Bach District, and may act as agent, depositary or trustee for any #1088,
committee or body of Owners or of owners of obligations Qf each #1090
District as freely as if it were not the Trustee hereunder. #1091
The Trustee shall not be answerable for the exercise Qf any #1092,
trusts hereunder or for anything whatsoever in gonnection with the #1094
funds established hereunder, except Qnly for its own willful miscon- #1095
duct, gross negligence or preach of an obligation hereunder. #1096
&ECTION 8.05. Aonointment of Paving Agent. The Trustee #1099
shall at all times appoint and maintain a _Raying Agent upon such #1100
terms and conditions as may be mutually agreed upon by the Trustee, #1101
each District and such Paying Agent. Such Paying Agent, or any suc- #1102
cessor Paying Agent, shall be a bank or trust company with a princi- #1103
pal corporate trust Office in New York, New York and shall be subject #1104
to supervision 2r examination by federal or state authorities. Such #1105
Raying Agent shall signify its acceptance of the duties and Qbliga- #1106,
tions imposed on it by this Trust Agreement by executing and deliver- #1108
ing to each District and to the Trustee a written acceptance #1109
thereof. The Trustee shall enter into such Arrangements with such #1110
Paying Agent as shall be necessary and desirable to enable such #1111
Paying Agent to carry out the duties Qf its office. The City or the #1112
Trustee may remove the Paying Agent at any time by giving written #1117
notice of such removal to the Paying Agent and each District or the #1114ft/
Trustee, as the case may be. The Paying Agent may at any time resign #1116
by giving at least sixty (60) days' notice of such resignation to #1117
each District, Trustee and by giving the Qwners of the Certificates #1118,
notice of such resignation by mail; grovided, however, that such res- #1120
ignation shall only take affect upon the appointment of a successor #1121
Paying Agent and the acceptance thereof by such successor Paying #1122
Agent. In the event of the resignation or removal of the Paying #1123
Agent, the Paying Agent shall pay over, transfer, assign and deliver #1124
Any moneys held by it to its successor on to the Trustee. #1125
The Trustee may appoint the Paying Agent to act as its #1126
Agent for the cancellation of Certificates. #1127
-25- #14
94948.1.2704.07 :1 # (14)
14./
ARTICLE IX #1128
�../ AMENDMENT OF OR SUPPLEMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT #(1128
f:ECTION 9.01. Amendment or Sunolement by Consent of Owners. #1130
The Trust Agreement and the rights and obligations of each District #1131,
and the Owners and the Trustee hereunder may be amended or supple- #1133,
mented at any time by an amendment hereof or supplement hereto which #1135
shall become binding when the written gonsents of the Owners of sixty #1136
per cent (60%) of th aggregate principal amount of the Certificates #1137
then Outstanding exclusive of Certificates disqualified as provided #1138
in Section 9.02, are filed with the Trustee. No such amendment or #1139
supplement shall (1) reduce the rate of interest evidenced and repre- #1140,
sented by any Certificate or extend the time of payment of such #1142
interest or reduce the amount of principal evidenced and represented #1143
by any Certificate or extend the payment date of any Certificate #1144
without the prior written gonsent of the Owner of the Certificate so #1145
affected, or (2) reduce the percentage of Owners whose consent is #1146
required for the execution of any amendment hereof or supplement #1147
hereto pr (3) modify any of the rights or obligations of the Trustee #1148
without its prior written consent thereto. #1149
The Trust Agreement and the rights and obligations of Bach #1150,
District and the Owners and the Trustee hereunder may also be amended #1152
or supplemented at any time, with the written consent of the Standby #1153
Purchaser, by an amendment hereof or supplement hereto which shall #1154
become binding upon execution without the written consents of any #1155
Qwners, but only to the extent permitted by law and after receipt of #1156,
an approving Opinion of Counsel and only for any pne or more of the #1158
following purposes #(115E
(a) to add to the agreements, conditions, cove- #1160
nants and Perms contained herein required to be #1161
observed or performed by each District other agree- #1162
ments, conditions, govenants and terms thereafter to #1163
be observed or performed by Bach District, or to sur- #1164
render any right reserved herein to or conferred #1165
herein on each District, and which in either case #1166
shall not adversely affect the interests of the #1167
Owners; or #(1167
(b) to make such provisions for the purpose of #1169
curing any ambiguity or of correcting, curing or sup- #1170
plementing any defective provision contained herein or #1171
in regard to questions arising hereunder which each #1172
District may deem desirable or necessary and not #1173
inconsistent herewith, and which shall not adversely #1174
affect the interests of the Owners. #(1174
$ACTION 9.02. Disqualified Certificates. Certificates #1177
owned or held by or for the account of Bach District (but excluding #1178
-26- #14
94948 .1. 2704 .07 :1 #(14)
Certificates held in any pension or Fetirement fund of each District) #117r
shall not be deemed Outstanding for the purpose of any consent or #118&.01
other action or any Calculation of Outstanding Certificates provided #1181
in this Article IX, and shall not be entitled to consent to or take #1182,
any other action provided in this article, And the Trustee may adopt #1184
appropriate regulations to require Bach Owner, before his consent #1185
provided for herein shall be deemed effective, to reveal if the #1186
Certificates as to which guch consent is given are disqualified as #1187
provided in this jection 9.02. #1188
§.ECTION 9.03. Endorsement or Replacement of Certificates #1190
After Amendment or Supplement. After the effective date of any # (1190
action taken as herein Above provided, the Trustee may determine that #1191
the Certificates May bear a notation by endorsement in form approved #1192
by the Baying Agent as to such action, and in that case upon demand #1193
If the Owner of any Outstanding Certificate and presentation of his #1194,
Certificate for such purpose at the principal corporate trust office #1196
of the Paying Agent in New York, New York, a Auitable notation as to #1197
such action shall be made on such Certificate. If the Trustee shall #1198
so determine, new Certificates Ao modified as in the opinion of the #1199
Trustee shall be necessary to conform to such action shall be pre- #1200
pared, and in that case upon demand of the Owner of any Outstanding #1201
Certificates such new Certificates shall be exchanged at the princi- #1202
pal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in New York, New York, #1203
without Cost to each Owner for Certificates then Outstanding upon #1204
surrender of such Outstanding Certificates. #(1204
ARTICLE Y #120-*^,/
DEFEASANCE # (1205
SECTION 10 . 01 . Discharge of Certificates and Trust #1206
Agreement. # (1206
Is) If the Paying Agent shall pay or cause to be paid Cr #1208,
there shall otherwise be paid to the Owners of all Outstanding #(120'
Certificates the interest and principal represented thereby At the #1210,
times and in the manner stipulated herein and therein then such #1212
Qwners shall cease to be entitled to the pledge of and lien ,Cn the #1213,
Installment Payments as provided herein, and all agreements And cove- #1215
nants of each District, the Trustee and the Baying Agent to such #1216
Owners hereunder shall thereupon cease, terminate and became void and #1217
shall be discharged and satisfied. # (1217
(b) Any Outstanding Certificates shall on the payment date #1219
or the date of prepayment prior thereto be deemed to have been paid #1220
within the meaning of and with the Affect expressed in subsection (a) #1221
of this Section 10.01 if there shall be on deposit kith the Trustee #1222
-27- #14
94948.1. 2704 .07 :1 #(14)
or the Paying Agent moneys which are sufficient to pay the interest #(1222
�./ And principal represented by such Certificates payable on such date. #1223
jc) Any Outstanding Certificates shall prior to the payment #1225
date or the date of prepayment prior thereto be deemed to have been #1226
paid within the meaning and with the Affect expressed in subsection #1227
(A) of this Section 10.01 if (1) in case any of such Certificates #1228
that are to be prepaid on any date prior to their payment date, the #1229
related District shall have given to the Trustee in form satisfactory # (1225
to it irrevocable instructions to mail notice of prepayment of such #1230
Certificates on such date, i2) there shall be on deposit with the #1231
Trustee either moneys in an 'amount which shall be sufficient or #1232
United States Treasury notes or bonds )ihich are not subject to pre- #1233
payment except by the Owner thereof prior to maturity iincluding any #1234
such securities issued or held in book-entry form on the books pf the #1235
Department of the Treasury of the United States of America) the # (123_
interest on and principal of which when paid will provide money #1236
which, together with the Money, if any, deposited with the Trustee at #1237
the same time, shall be sufficient to enable the Paying Agent to pay #1238
when due the interest evidenced and represented by such Certificates #1239
on and prior to the payment date or the date of prepayment prior #1240
thereto, as the case may be, and the principal and prepayment premi- # (124C
=a, if Any, evidenced and represented by such Certificates, and (3) #1241
in the event such Certificates are not by their terms subject to pre- #1242
payment within the next succeeding Aixty (60) days, the related #1243
District shall have given the Trustee in form satisfactory to it #1244
irrevocable instructions to mail a notice to the Owners of such #(1244
Certificates that the deposit required by clause (2) above has been #1245
made with the Trustee And that such Certificates are deemed to have #1246
been paid in accordance with this section 10.01 and stating the pay- #1247
ment date or prepayment date upon which money is to be available for #1248
the payment of the principal of and prepayment premiums, if any, evi- #1249
denced and represented by such Certificates. #(1249
Sd) After the payment of all the interest and principal #1251
represented by all Qutstanding Certificates as provided in this #1252
Section 10.01, the Trustee and the Paying agent shall execute and #1253
deliver to each District all such instruments As may be necessaryor #1254
desirable to evidence the discharge and satisfaction of the Trust #1255
Agreement, and the Trustee shall pay over or deliver to each District #(125°
to its respective percentage of liability under the Certificates All #1256,
money or securities held by it pursuant hereto which are not required # (1257
for the payment of the interest and principal represented by such #1258
Certificates. # (125E
je) After the payment of all the interest and principal #1260
represented by all Outstanding Certificates as provided in this #1261
Section 10.01, the Trustee and the Paying Agent shall gxecute and #1262
deliver to each District all such instruments As may be necessary or #1263
-28- #14
94948.1.2704.07 :1 # (14)
desirable to evidence the discharge and satisfaction of the Trust #126
Agreement, and the Trustee shall pay over or deliver to each District #(12&0,
to its respective percentage of liability under the Certificates all #1265
money or securities held by it pursuant hereto which are not required #1266
for the payment of the interest and principal represented by such #1267
Certificates. #(1267
$BCTION 10.02. Unclaimed Moneys. Anything contained #1269
herein to the contrary notwithstanding, Any money held by the Trustee #1270
or the Paying Agent in trust for the payment and discharge of the #1271
interest or principal evidenced and represented by any of the #1272
Certificates which Femains unclaimed for two (2) years after the date #1273
when the payments evidenced and represented by such Certificates have #1274,
become payable, if such money was held by the Trustee or the Paying #1276,
Agent at such date, or for two (2) years after the date of deposit of #1278
such money if deposited with the Trustee or the Paying Agent after #1279
the date when the interest and principal gvidenced and represented by #1280
such Certificates have become payable, shall at the Written Request #1281
District No. 1 be repaid by the Trustee or the Paying Agent, as the #1282
case may be, to each District, to its respective percentage of #(1282
liability under the Certificates As its absolute property free from #1283,
trust, and the Trustee shall thereupon be released and discharged #1285
with Sespect thereto and the Owners shall look only to each District #1286
represented by such Certificates; provided, however, that before #1287
being required to make any such payment to each District, the Trustee #1288,
shall, at the expense of each District, cause to be published gnce a #1290
week for two (2) successive weeks in a Financial fiewspaper a notice #1291
that such money ruins unclaimed and that after a date named in such #129'
notice, which date shall not be Less than thirty (30) days after the #129�
date of the first publication of such notice, the balance of such #1294
money then unclaimed will be returned to each District. #1295
ARTICLE %I #1296
MISCELLANEOUS #(1296
j5ECTION 11.01. Benefits of Trust Agreement Limited to #1298
Parties. Nothing contained herein, expressed or implied, is intended #1299
to give to any person other than each District, the Trustee, the #1300
Paying Agent And the Owners any claim, remedy or right under or pur- #1301,
suant hereto, and any Agreement, condition, covenant or term con- #1303
tained herein Eequired to be observed or performed by or on behalf of #1304
Bach District shall be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the #1305,
Trustee, the Paying Agent and the Qwners. #1307
.SECTION 11.02. Successor Deemed Included in all References #1309
to Predecessor. Whenever a District, the Trustee or the Paying Agent #1310,
or any officer thereof is named or referred to herein, such reference #1312
-29- #14
94948.1.2704.07:1 #(14)
shall be deemed to include the successor to the powers, duties and #1313
�./ functions that Are presently vested in each District, the Trustee or #1314,
the Paying Agent or such officer, and all agreements, conditions, #1316
covenants and terms required hereby to be observed or performed by or #1317,
on behalf of each District, the Trustee or the Paying Agent or any #1319,
officer thereof shall bind and inure to the benefit of the respective #1321
successors thereof yhether so expressed or not. #1322
fiECTION 11.03. Execution of Documents by Owners. Any #1324
declaration, request or other instrument which is permitted or #1325
required herein to be executed by Owners may be in Qne or more #1326
instruments of similar tenor and May be executed by Owners in person #1327
or by their attorneys Appointed in writing. The fact and date of the #1328
execution by any Qner or his or her attorney of any declaration, #1329
request or other instrument or of any writing appointing such attor- #1330
ney may be proved by the certificate of any notary public or other #1331
officer authorized to take acknowledgments of deeds to be recorded in #1332
the state or territory in which he purports to act, that the person #1333,
signing such declaration, request or other instrument or )iriting #1335
acknowledged to him the execution thereof, or by an Affidavit of a #1336
witness of such execution duly sworn to before Auch notary public or #1337
other officer, or by such other proof as the Trustee or the Paying #1338
Agent, as the case may be, May accept which it may deem sufficient. #1339
Any declaration, request or other instrument in griting of #1340,
the Owner of any Certificate shall bind all future Qwners of such #1342
Certificate with respect to anything done or Buffered to be done by #1343
each District or the Trustee in good faith and in accordance #1344
r/ therewith. #(1344
.JECTIOH 11.04. Waiver of Personal Liability. No member #1346
of the Board of Directors, officer or employee of Bach District shall #1347
be individually or personally liable for the payment of the interest #1348
or principal evidenced and represented by the Certificates, but noth- #1349
ing contained herein shall relieve Any councilmember, officer or #1350
employee of each District from the performance of any official duty #1351
provided by any applicable provisions of law or by the Agreement for #1352
Acquisition and Construction of Joint Facilities or hereby. #1353
fiECTIOH 11.05. Acquisition of Certificates by each #1355
District. All Certificates acquired by each District, whether by # (135`
purchase or gift or otherwise, shall be surrendered to the Trustee #1356,
for cancellation who shall thereupon notify the Paying Agent of such #1358
cancellation. #(135(
,JRCTIOH 11,06, Content of Certificates. Every Certificate #2360
of the representative District with respect to compliance Hith any #1361
agreement, condition, covenant or term contained herein shall include #1362
( a) a statement that the person or persons Making or giving such #1363
-30- #14
94948.1. 2704.07 :1 # (14)
certificate have read such agreement, condition, covenant or term and #136` J
the definitions herein relating thereto; (b) a brief statement as to #1365�
the nature and scope of the examination or investigation upon which #1366
the statements contained in such certificate are based; (c) a state- #1367
ment that, in the opinion of the signers they have made or caused to #1368
be made such examination or investigation as is necessary to finable #1369,
them to express an informed opinion as to whether or not such agree- #1371
ment, condition, covenant or term has been complied gith; and (d) a #1372
statement as to whether, in the opinion of the signers, such agree- #1373
ment, condition, covenant or term has been complied with. #1374
Any Certificate of the representative District may be #1375
based, insofar as it relates to legal matters, upon an Opinion of #1376
Counsel unless the person making or giving such certificate knows #1377
that the Opinion of Counsel with respect to the matters upon which #1378
such certificate May be based, as aforesaid, is erroneous, or in the #1379
exercise of reasonable care should have known that the same was #1380
erroneous. Any Opinion of Counsel may be based, insofar as it #1381
relates to factual matters information with respect to which is jn #1382,
the possession of each District, upon a representation with by an #1384
officer or officers of each District unless the counsel executing #1385
such Opinion of Counsel knows that the representation gith respect to #1386
the matters upon which his opinion may be based, As aforesaid, is #1387
erroneous, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known #1388
that the same was erroneous. #(138E
$BCTION 11.07. Notice by Nail. Any notice required to be #1390
given hereunder by mail to any gwners of Certificates shall be given #139` J
by mailing a copy of such notice, first class postage prepaid, to the #139Z
Owners of such Certificates at their addresses appearing in the books #1393,
required to be kept by the Paying Agent pursuant to the provisions of #1395
Section 2.07 not less than fifteen (15) days nor !gore than thirty #1396
(30) days following the action or prior to the event concerning which #1397
notice thereof is required to be given unless this Trust Agreement #1398
expressly provides a different provision; Provided, that receipt of #1399
any such notice shall not be a condition precedent to the effect of #1400
such notice and failure to receive any such notice shall not affect #1401,
the validity of the proceedings taken in connection with the action #1403
or the event concerning which such notice was given. #(1403
&BCPION 11.08. Funds. Any fund or account required to be #1405
established and gaintained herein by the Trustee may be established #1406
And maintained in the accounting records of the Trustee either as an #1407,
account or a fund, and may, for the purposes of such accounting #1409
records, any audits thereof and any reports or statements with #1410
respect thereto, be treated either as an Account or a fund; but all #1411
such records with respect to all such funds shall at all times be #1412
maintained in accordance with sound accounting practice and with due #1413
-31- #14
94948 .1 .2704.07 :1 #(14)
regard for the protection of the security of the Certificates and the 41414
�./ rights 2f the Owners. 41415
,JECTION 11.09. Investments. Any money held by the Trustee 41417
in any fund or account created pursuant to the Agreement for 41418
Acquisition and Construction of Joint Facilities and hereto shall be 41419
invested in Permitted Investments which will, As nearly as practica- 41420
ble, mature on or before the dates Khan such money is anticipated to 41421
be needed for disbursement hereunder, and are otherwise in accordance 41422
with Auch directions as each District may from time to time provide 41423
to the Trustee. if no such direction has been received by the 41424,
Trustee money invested by the Trustee shall be invested so as to 41426
obtain the highest yield Which the Trustee deems practicable, having 41427
due regard for the safety of such money, and the Trustee may act as 41428
principal or Agent in the acquisition or disposition of any such 41429
investment. The Trustee shall not be liable or responsible for any 41430
loss suffered in connection with any such investment made by it ynder 41431,
the terms of and in accordance with this Section 11.09. The Trustee 41433
may sell or present for prepayment any obligations so purchased when- 41434
ever it shall be necessary in order to provide moneys to meet any 41435
payment of the funds so invested, And the Trustee shall not be liable 41436
or responsible for any losses resulting from any such investment sold 41437
or presented for prepayment. All interest or profits received Qn 41438,
such investments shall be deposited in the respective fund 2r account 41440
from which such investment was made. [All investments ,Made pursuant 41441
to this Trust Agreement shall be valued at least quarterly at the 4(1441
lower of cost or current market. ] Review re: DSRF; Tax pt. choice #1442,
must be made. 4(1443
.i
2SCTIOB 11.10. Article and Section Headings. Gender and i1445
References. The headings or titles of the several articles and sec- 41446
tions hereof and the table of contents appended hereto shall ¢e 41447
solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the meaning, 41448
construction or effect hereof, and words of any gender shall be 41449
deemed and construed to include all genders. All references herein 41450
to "Articles, " •Sections" and other subdivisions or clauses are to 41451
the corresponding articles, sections, subdivisions or clauses hereof, 41452
and the words 'hereby, ' "herein, " "hereof, " "hereto, " "herewith, " 41453
"hereunder' and other words of similar import refer to the Trust 41454
Bgreement as a whole and not to any particular article, section, sub- 41455,
division or clause thereof. 4(1456
$BCTION 11.11. Partial Invalidity. If any one or more of 41458
the agreements, conditions, covenants or terms contained herein 41459
required to be observed 2r performed by or on the part of each 41460
District, the Trustee or the Paying Agent shall be contrary to law, 41461
then such agreement or agreements, such condition or conditions such 41462,
covenant or covenants or such term or terms shall be Dull and void 41464
and shall be deemed separable from the Lemaining agreements, 41465
-32- 414
94948 . 1.2704 .07 :1 4(14)
conditions, covenants and terms hereof and shall in no way affect the #1466%.,
validity hereof or of the Certificates, and the Owners shall retain #1467
all the benefit, protection and security afforded to them under any #1468
applicable provisions of law. Each District, the Trustee and the #1469,
Paying Agent hereby declare that they would have executed the Trust #1471
Agreement, and each and every other article, section, paragraph, sub- #1472
division, sentence, clause and phrase hereof and would have autho- #1473
rized the execution and delivery of the Certificates pursuant hereto #1474
irrespective of the fact that any one or more articles, sections, #1475
paragraphs, subdivisions, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof or the #1476
application thereof to any person or circumstance may be held to be #1477
unconstitutional, unenforceable or invalid. #1478
$ECTIOB 11.12. California Lay. The Trust Agreement shall #1480
be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of #1481
California. #(1481
BECTIOE 11.13. Notices. All written notices to be given #1483
hereunder shall be given by mail to the party entitled thereto at its #1484
address set forth in Appendix B hereto, or at such other address as #1485
such party may provide to the other parties in writing from time to #1486
time. # (148E
.EECTIOE 11.14. Effective Date. The Trust Agreement shall #1488
become effective upon its execution and delivery. #1489
SECTION 11.IS. Execution in Coanterparts. T h e T r u s t #149"
Agreement may be executed in several gounterparts, each of which #149�-W
shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute but #1493
one and the same instrument. #1494
-33- #14
94948.1 .2704.07 :1 # (14)✓
;N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and i1498,
�.s attested this Trust Agreement by their pfficers thereunto duly autho- 41500
rized as of the day and year first written above. #1501
]TRUSTEE) i1504
By 11506
(SEAL) By 41508
JPAYING AGENT] i1510
$y f1512
(SEAL) By 41514
.COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT f1516
NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, 4 (15lf
CALIFORNIA 4(1516
(SEAL) By 41518
�./ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 41520
NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, 4 (1520
CALIFORNIA 4 (1520
(SEAL) By i1522
CCOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 41524
NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, S (152,
CALIFORNIA 4 (152,
(SEAL) By #1526
_34- 414
94948 .1 . 2704 .07 :1 k (14)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 4152
NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, # (152'P'
CALIFORNIA 4 (152f
(SEAL) By 41530
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #1532
NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, 4 (153-,
CALIFORNIA 4 (153:
(SEAL) By 41534
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 61536
NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, A (153E
CALIFORNIA 4 (153(
(SEAL) By #1538
_35- #14
94948.1.2704.07:1 i(14)
APPENDIX A #1552
JFORM OF CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION) #1554
L10. #1556
.CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION #1559
Fvidencing and Representing a Direct and Proportionate #1560
Interest of the Owner Hereof #1561
in Installment Payments to be Made #1562
by County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, #1563
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, #1564
County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, #1565
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, #1566
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California and #1567
County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, #1568
.Under and Pursuant to the #1570
AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF JOINT FACILITIES #1571
REGISTERED OWNER: #1573
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: #1574
.THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the Qwner specified above of this #1576,
Certificate of Participation (County Sanitation Districts of Orange #1578
County, California Joint Facilities Project) Sthe 'Certificate") , is #1579,
the Owner of a proportionate interest in the rights to receive cer- 11581
tain Installment Payments and the interest thereon under and pursuant #1582
to that certain Agreement for Acquisition and Construction of Joint #1583
Facilities, dated as of ,tune 1, 1986 Lthe "Agreement for Acquisition #1584,
and Construction") , by and among County Sanitation District No. 1 of #1586
Orange County, California, County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange #1587
County, California, County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange #1588
County, California, County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange #1589
County, California, County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange #1590
County, California and County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange #1591
County, California, gach constituting a 'county sanitation district" #1592
.duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws Qf #1593,
California, including particularly the County ,Janitation District Act #1595
(the "Act') of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California #1596
(singularly, a 'District, ' collectively, the "Districts') ; All rights #1597 ,
to receive such Installment Payments And the interest thereon, #1599
together with certain other rights, have been assigned without #1600
recourse by the Districts to , as trustee (the #1601,
"Trustee') , a national banking Association duly organized and exist- #1603
ing under and by virtue ,gf the laws of the United States of America #1604
and having a principal corporate trust office in , #1605
Qr any other bank or trust company which may At any #1606,
time be substituted in its place as provided in ,the Trust Agreement #1608
hereinafter mentioned. #(1608
94948.1.2704.07:1 #10
The Owner of this Certificate is entitled to receive, #161` ,
subject to the terms of the Agreement for Acquisition and #16N
Construction and any right of prepayment prior thereto hereinafter 91613
provided for, on _ (the "Certificate Payment Date") , #1614
upon surrender of this Certificate on the Certificate Payment Date or #1615,
on the date of prepayment prior thereto at the principal corporate #1617
trust office of pf New York (the "Paying Agent") #1618
in , , the Principal Amount specified above rep- #1619,
resenting the Owner's proportionate share of the Installment Payments #1621
becoming due and payable on the Certificate Payment Date, and to #1622
receive on each Interest gayment Date from the date hereof (which #1623
date shall be the Interest Payment Date next preceding the date of #1624
delivery hereof by the Trustee, unless such date of delivery is an #1625
Interest Payment Date, in which case the date hereof shall be such #1626,
Interest Payment Date, or unless such date of delivery is prior to #1628
, 1986, in which case the date hereof shall be the date of #1629
original delivery of the Certificates) to and including the #1630
Certificate Payment Date or the date of prepayment prior thereto, #1631,
whichever is earlier, by check or draft Mail to the Owner at the #1634
address shown on the registration books for the Certificates on the #1635
Record Date, the Owner's proportionate share of the interest on the #1636,
Installment Payments becoming due and payable on such Interest #1638
Payment Date. Buch interest is the result of the multiplication of #1639
the aforesaid portion of the 1985 Installment Payments becoming due #1640,
on the Certificate Payment Date by the interest Late determined pur- #1642
suant to the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, all as more #1643
particularly described therein. All such amounts are payable in #1644
lawful money of the United States of America. #164,,.,,
This Certificate is one of the duly authorized certificates #1646,
of participation designated Certificates of #(164.
Participation (County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 14 #1648
of Orange County, California Joint Facilities Project) aggregating #1649
$ in principal amount Which has been executed by the #1650
Trustee and authenticated by the Paying Agent under and pursuant to #1651
the terms of Trust Agreement, dated August 1, 1986 (the "Trust #1652
Agreement") , by and among the Trustee, the Paying Agent and each #1653
District, and all capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined #1655
shall have the definitions for such terms contained in the Trust #1656
Agreement. Copies of the Trust Agreement are on file at the princi- #1657,
pal corporate trust office of the Trustee in , and at the #1659
principal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in , #1660
, and reference is hereby made to the Trust Agreement and #1661
to any And all amendments thereof and supplements thereto for a #1662
description of the agreements, conditions, covenants and terms secur- #1663,
ing the Certificates, for the nature, extent and manner of enforce- 91665
ment of such agreements, conditions, covenants and terms, for the #1666
rights and remedies of the Qwners of the Certificates with respect #1667
thereto and for the other agreements, conditions, covenants and terms #1668.
upon which the Certificates are executed and delivered thereunder. #1670
-2- #8
iInterest to Come] #1671
.To the extent and in the manner permitted by the terms of #1672,
the Trust Agreement, the provisions of the Trust Agreement may be #1674
amended or supplemented by the parties thereto, but no such amendment #1675
or supplement shall (i) reduce the rate of interest evidenced hereby #1676
or extend the time of payment of such interest or reduce the amount #1677
of principal or prepayment premiums, if any, evidenced hereby or #1678
extend the Certificate Payment Date hereof without the prior written #1679
consent of the Qwner hereof, or (ii) reduce the percentage of goners #1680,
of Certificates whose consent is required for the execution of any #1682
amendment of or supplement to the Trust Agreement, or (iii) modify #1683
any rights or obligations of the Trustee without its prior written #1684
consent thereto. #(1684
The Certificates are authorized to be executed and deliv- #1685,
ered in the form of fully registered Certificates in denominations of #1687
_five thousand dollars ($5,000) or any integral multiple thereof. #1688,
This Certificate is transferable or exchangeable ¢y the #1690,
Owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing, #1692
at the principal corporate trust Office of the Paying Agent, but only #1693
in the manner, subject to the limitations and upon payment of the #1694
charges provided in the Trust Agreement, and upon surrender of this #1695
Certificate for cancellation accompanied by delivery of a duly exe- #1696
cuted written instrument of transfer or exchange in a form Approved #1697,
by the Paying Agent. Upon such transfer or exchange, A new #1699
Certificate or Certificates of authorized denominations of the same #1700
../ payment date representing the same aggregate principal amount hereof # (1700
will be gxecuted by the Trustee and authenticated and delivered by #1701
the Paying Agent to the Owner thereof in exchange herefore the Paying #1702
Agent shall require the payment by the Owner requesting such transfer #1703
or exchange of any tax or other governmental charge required to be #1704
paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The Trustee and the #1705,
Paying Agent may treat the Owner I.ereof as the absolute Owner hereof #1707
for all purposes, whether Qr not this Certificate shall be overdue, #1708
and the Trustee and the Paying Agent shall not be affected by any #(170E
knowledge or notice to the contrary; and payment of the interest and #1709
principal and prepayment premium, if any, evidenced by this #1710
Qertificate shall be made only to such Owner, which payments shall be #1711,
valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge liability evidenced by 11713
this Certificate to the gxtent of the sum or sums so paid. #1714
The Certificates are subject to optional prepayment Qn any #1715,
date prior to 1, , upon notice as hereinafter #1717
described, as a whole or in part in an integral multiple of the then 41718,
authorized minimum denomination of the Certificates ¢y lot, from pre- #1720
paid Installment Payments made by each District from funds received #1721
by each District due to a casualty loss or governmental taking of the #1722
Project or portions thereof by eminent domain proceedings, under the #1723
circumstances and upon the conditions and terms prescribed in the #1724
-3- #8
Trust Agreement and in the Agreement for Acquisition and #172�
Construction, at a prepayment price gqual to the sum of the principal #1726
amount evidenced and represented thereby plus accrued interest evi- #1727
denced and represented thereby accrued to the date fixed for # (1727
prepayment. #1728
[Prepayment or Redemption] #1729
As provided in the Trust Agreement, notice of prepayment #1731 ,
hereof shall be mailed, first class postage prepaid, not less than #1733
fifteen (15) nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the prepayment #1734
date, to the Owner of this Certificate (or, if the Standby Purchaser #1735
is such an Owner, then by such notice to the Trustee) at his address #1736
as it appears in the registration books maintained by the Paying #1737
Agent, but failure to receive any such notice shall not affect the #1738
validity of the proceedings for the prepayment of this Certificate. #1739
If this Certificate is called for prepayment and payment is duly pro- #1740
vided herefore as specified in the Trust Agreement, the interest evi- #1741
denced hereby shall cease to accrue from and after the date fixed for #1742,
prepayment. # (1743
.The Certificates each evidence a proportionate interest in #1744,
the Installment Payments and an interest in the interest thereon And #1746
enjoy the benefits of an interest in the money held in certain funds #1747
established pursuant to the Trust Agreement, subject to the provi- #1748
sions of the Trust Agreement permitting the disbursements thereof for #1749
or to the purpose and on the conditions and terms set forth therein. #175f
The obligations of each District to make the Installment Payments and #1751'/
pay interest ,thereon is a special obligation of each District payable #1752
solely from legally available moneys from whatever source of each #1753
District and the other funds provided in the Agreement for #1754
Acquisition and Construction and the Trust Agreement, and does not #1755
constitute a debt of each District or of the State of California or #1756
of any political subdivision thereof yithin the meaning of any con- #1757
stitutional debt limitation or restriction. #1758
,The Trustee has no obligation or liability to the Owners of #1759,
the Certificates for the payment of the interest or prepayment premi- #1761
ums, if any, gvidenced by the Certificates; but rather the Trustee's #1762
sole gbligations are to administer, for the benefit of each District #1763
And the Owners of the Certificates, the various funds established #1764,
under the Trust Agreement. #1766
-4- #8
1,/
.�, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate has been executed by i1769 ,
the manual or facsimile signature of an authorized officer of the 41771
Trustee and authenticated by the Manual signature of an authorized 41772
officer of the Paying Agent. i (1772
Qated: i1773
_ 61775
as Trustee i1776
ay S177F
Authorized Officer #1779
Authenticated: i1780
_ as Paying #1781
Agent 4 (1781
Ay i1783
Authorized Officer 41784
-5- t8
ASSIGNMENT 11788
For value received, the undersigned does hereby sell, i1790,
assign and transfer unto the within 1 (1791
Certificates and do(es) hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 11792
attorney to transfer such Certificate 11793
on the register of the Paying Agent, with full power of substitution 41794
in the premises. 11795
Dated: 11798
i1800
Note : The signature(s) to this Assignment must correspond with the 11804 ,
name(s) as written on the face of the within Certificate in i1806
every particular, without alteration or gnlargement or any 41807
change whatsoever. i (1807
-6- 48
�../ APPENDIX B #1810
(i) #1811
Funded Reserve Acquisition #1814
Interest Account Account #1815
gist. No. Deposit Requirement Deposit #1816,
I #1820
2 #1821
¢ 822
#1823
#1824
¢ #1825
14 #1826
(ii) #1830
District No. 1 #1833
District No. 2 #1835
District No. 3 #1837
9_4948.1.2704.07 :1 #10
District No. 5 #�9
District No. 6 #1841
District No. 14 #1843
-III. ADDRESS AND CONTRACT PERSON AT EACH DISTRICT #1847
2 #Q
DRAFT #9.1.7
�.,./ 7/2/86 #9.2
ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT #12
by and between each of #17
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, #20
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, #21
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, #22
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, #23
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #23.2
And #23.3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #23.4
And #23.7
, as Trustee #23.9
Dated as of August 1, 1986 #23.11
94948.1 .2704.06:3 #10
u
�R.
ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT #26 ` !
.This Assignment Agreement, dated as of the 1st day of #29,3C
August, 1986 (hereinafter, the "Assignment Agreement") by and between #31
each of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, #31.1
California, County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, #32
California, County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, #33
California, County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, #33 .1
California, County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, #33.2
California and County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, #33.3
California, each constituting a "county sanitation district" duly #33.4,
organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws cf California, #33.6
including particularly the County Sanitation District Act (the "Act") #33.7
of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (singularly, #33 .8
a " District , " collectively , the "Districts " ) and #33.9,
, a banking association duly organized and #35,3C
existing under and by virtue of the laws of the _ 437
(hereinafter called the "Trustee") ; #(37)
WITNESSETH• #40
In the joint and mutual exercise of their powers, in con- #43
sideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other #44
valuable consideration, the parties hereto recite and agree as #45
follows: # (45�
SECTION 1. Recitals. #46
(a) The Districts have entered into an Agreement for the #48,4'
Acquisition and Construction of Joint Facilities dated as of #49.1 ,
August 1, 1986 Sthe "Agreement for Acquisition and Construction") , #51
whereby each District has agreed to pay installment payments and the #(51)
interest thereon to the Trustee for the Acquisition of certain facil- #53,5-
ities and improvements thereto used in the ]handling, treatment and #54.0.
disposal of sewage and industrial waste S.the "Facilities") , which #54.0.
gacilities are more particularly described to Exhibit B to the #54.0.
Agreement for Acquisition and Construction and by this reference #(54.C -
incorporated herein. The Facilities will be jointly owned py the #54.0.
Districts and certain other county sanitation districts in Orange #(54.1
County, California which, together with the Districts, constitute all #54.2
of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. #54.3
Sp) Upon execution and delivery of the Agreement for #62
Acquisition and Construction, each of the Districts is required to #63
deposit or cause to be deposited with the Trustee certain sums of #64
money to be credited, held and applied in accordance with the Trust #65
Agreement by and among the Trustee and each of the Districts dated as #66,6,
of August 1, 1986 (the "Trust Agreement") . #68
2_4948.1.2704.06:3 #10 1 I
Sc) Upon delivery of the Agreement for Acquisition and #70
L..✓ Construction and the deposit of moneys by each of the Districts with #71
respect thereto, each of the Districts is 2bligated to pay certain #72
Installment Payments and interest thereon to the other Districts or #73
their assignee. for the purpose of obtaining the moneys required to 474,75
be deposited with the Trustee, each District is willing to assign and #76
transfer its rights and interests under the Agreement for Acquisition #77
and Construction to the Trustee for the benefit of the Owners of the #78
Certificates of Participation (the "Certificates") to be executed and #79
delivered finder the Trust Agreement, and in consideration of such #80
assignment, the Trustee is executing, delivering and selling such #81
Certificates to the purchasers thereof, the proceeds of which sale #82
are anticipated to be sufficient to provide the moneys required to be #83
deposited ¢y the Districts pursuant to the Agreement for Acquisition #84
and Construction. #(84)
(d) Each of the parties has authority to enter into this #86
Assignment Agreement, and has taken all actions necessary to autho- #87
rize its 2fficers to enter into it. #88
je) The terms capitalized in this Assignment Agreement but #90
not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the #91,9:
Agreement for Acquisition and Construction and the Trust Agreement. # (92)
SECTION 2. Assignment. #94
Each of the Districts, for One Dollar ($1.00) and other #(94)
good and valuable consideration in hand received, does hereby irrevo- #95
cably sell, Assign and transfer to the Trustee, for the benefit of #96
the Qwners of the Certificates executed and delivered under the Trust #97,9E
Agreement, all of its rights, title and interest in the Agreement for #99
Acquisition and Construction, including its rights to receive #100
Installment Payments and the interest thereon gram each of the other #102
Districts under the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, and #103
the right to exercise such rights and Eemedies as are conferred on #104
each of the Districts by the Agreement for Acquisition and #(104)
Construction As may be necessary to enforce payment of such #105
Installment Payments when due or otherwise to protect its interests #106
in the event of A default by any other District. The Installment #107,1
Payments shall be applied, and the rights so assigned ghall be exer- #109
cised, by the Trustee as provided in the Trust Agreement. #(109)
^SECTION 3. Acceptance. #111
The Trustee hereby accepts such assignment in trust for the #(111)
purpose 2f securing such payments and rights to .the Owners of the #112
Certificates delivered pursuant to the Trust Agreement, and @object 1113,1
to the provisions of the Trust Agreement. #(114)
-2- #6
94948.1.2704.06:3 #(6)
aECTION 4: Conditions. #116
This Assignment Agreement shall confer no rights and impose # (116)
no duties upon the Trustee beyond those expressly provided in the #117,7
Trust Agreement. # (118)
.IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties have executed this #119
Assignment Agreement by their officers thereunto duly authorized as #120
of the day and year first written above. #121
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #124
NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(124)
CALIFORNIA # (124.
By #126
.Title: #126.:
jS EAL) #126 .:
Attest: #126.°
#126
Secretary # (12�.)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #126.5
NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(126.
CALIFORNIA # (126 .
gy #126.:
.Title: #126-
-(SEAL) #126.1
Attest: #126.3
#126.)
Secretary # (126.
_3- #6
94948.1.2704.06:3 # (6)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #126.2
NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(126.
CALIFORNIA # (126.
By #126.2
Title: #126.2
(SEAL) #126.2
Attest: #126.2
#126.2
Secretary #(126.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #126.3
NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(126.
CALIFORNIA # (126.
BY #126.3
Title: #126 .3
(SEAL) #126.3
Attest: #126.3
#126.,
Secretary # (126.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #126.4
NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(126.
CALIFORNIA # (126.
By #126. 4
Title: #126.4
-4- #6
94948.1.2704.06 :3 # (6)
SSEAL) i12 E
Attest: i126.1
i126.!
Secretary i (126 .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT i126.!
NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, i(126.
CALIFORNIA i (126.
BY i126.!
.Title: i126.!
(SEAL) i126.`.
Attest: i126.(
i126.(
Secretary i (12v
i128
as Trustee i (128)
By i130
Trust Officer i (130
-5- i6
94948.1.2704.06:3 i (6)
t?i County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 3, 5 6 and 19 of OS57F-1
Oran a County, CaTtiorma
E M,000Certificates Paruci ation
Joint FacilitiesProjects;
New Issue Raaunys
a e ate: s Investors Service
u y 1986 tan ar oor s orporauon
The certificates of participation described in this official statement represent
the proportionate interest of the registered owners in installment payments to
be made by County Sanitation Districts Nos.1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 14 of Orange
County, California, pursuant to a trust agreement dated as of July 1, 1986,
between the Districts and (the "trustee"). Proceeds of
the certificates will be use to manse a istricts' share of certain regional
sewage transmission, treatment, and disposal facilities. Each of the Districts is
responsible for its proportionate share of annual installment payments. The
certificates are payable from all unrestricted revenues of each participating
District, up to that District's annual obligation.
Certificates Dated: August 1, 1986
D—eno—=--at—io—n:--15,000 or multiple thereof
u1 u ugust 1, as shown below
Yield Yield
or or
Year Amount Rate Price Year Amount Rate Price
1989 $ % % 2001 $ % %
1990 2002
1991 2003
1992 2004
1993 2005
1994 2006
1995 2007
1996 2008
1997 2009
�../ 1998 2010
1999 2011
2000
The certificates are fully registered certificates, with provision for registration
transfer. Principal is payable annually beginning August 1, 1989, at the principal
corporate office of the trustee,
California. Interest is paya a semtannua y on a ruary and
ugus�inning February 1, 1987, by check or draft mailed to the registered
owner.
Certificates maturing on or before August 1, 1996 are not callable prior to maturity
except from the proceeds of insurance or condemnation. Certificates maturing
on or after August 1, 1997 are callable at the Districts' option on any interest
payment date on or after August 1, 1996 on terms stated in the official notice
of sale, including payment of a premium.
The certificates are offered for delivery when, as, and if issued subject to the
legal opinion of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, Los Angeles, California,
and Rourke & Woodruff, Orange, California, co-bond counsel, approving the
validity of the certificates snd stating that, under existing laws, regulations,
and judici,:! decisicrs, the portion of each installment payment due under the
trust agreement designated as and comprising interest and received by the owners
of the certificates is exempt from income taxation by the United States of America
and from personal income taxation imposed by the State of California.
Terms and conditions of the offerin are full set forth in the notice of sale
ate u y i s w•t a receive on a nes ay u y at e
ftces o u ge ose u rie ex�an er a Fer on,333SouthGraan venue,
Suite OZUZO OSAngeles, �i�a, anal-1T"60a.m.Pacnic Tune.bias wll
not a accepted or less an percent o par. Following acceptance o a id,
\� indormation on interest rates and reoffering prices will be imprinted in me spaces
above.
This page supplements the accompanying official statement dated July 9, 1986.
£
Official Statement
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California
PO Box 8127 '
Fountain Valley CA 92708
Participating Districts
County Sanitation District No. 1
County Sanitation District No. 2
County Sanitation District No. 3
County Sanitation District No. 5
County Sanitation ➢istrict No. 6
County Sanitation District No. 14
Don R. Griffin, Joint Chairman, Joint Boards of Directors, County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County
Don E. Smith, Vice Joint Chairman, Joint Boards of Directors, County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County
Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman, County Sanitation District No. 1
A. B. •Buck• Catlin, Chairman, County Sanitation District No. 2
Richard Partin, Chairman, County Sanitation District No. 3
Evelyn Hart, Chairman, County Sanitation District No. 5
James A. Wahner, Chairman, County Sanitation District No. 6
Sally Anne Miller, Chairman, County Sanitation District No. 14
Districts Staff
J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
William B. Butler, Director Of Finance
Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering
Professional Services
Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander A Pardon, Los Angeles, Co-Bond Counsel
Bourke a Woodruff, Orange, Co-Bond Counsel
, Los Angeles, Trustee and Paying Agent
Bartle Wells Associates, San Francisco, Financial Advisor
This official statement provides information about the issuer and its bonds.
The official statement includes:
1. Data supplied by the issuer and by others, as indicated herein)
2. Estimates or projections which may or may not be realized and which should
not be construed as assertions of fact; and
3. Summaries and descriptions of legal and financial documents, or their
contents, which do not purport to describe such documents completely and
which are made expressly subject to the full provisions of the documents
cited.
This official statement does not constitute a recommendation, express or
implied, to purchase or not to purchase these bonds or any other previous bonds
of the issuer.
The date of this official statement is
July 9, 1986
Prepared on behalf of the issuer by:
Bartle Wells Associates
Independent Public Finance Advisors
1636 Bush Street, San Francisco 94109
415/775-3113
OS57E-1
The Certificates
v
Description: E ,000,000 Certificates of Participation
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 14 of
Orange County, California
Joint Facilities Projects
Date: August 1, 1986
Denomination: $5,000 or multiple thereof
Estimated Annual Amortization Schedule:
Year Interest Principal Estimated
Ending Estimated Maturing Total
August 1 at %1 August 1 Debt Service
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
1 - Interest has been estimated at the annual rate shown. Actual interest
rates will be set by competitive bid, and are likely to vary from the
annual rate estimated. As a result, both interest and debt service
are expected to differ from the amounts estimated.
2 - Callable on any interest payment date on or after August 1, 1995.
OS57E-2 '
Interest: Interest is payable semiannually on February 1 and August 1,
beginning February 1, 1987. Interest due on February 1, 1987 on
behalf of District No. I only is payable from proceeds of the certificates.
Redemption: Certificates maturing 1989 through 1996 ($
principal amount) not callable except from the application of proceeds
of insurance or condemnation. Certificates maturing 1997 through
2011 (8 principal amount) callable at the option of the
Districts as a whole or in part on any interest payment date on or
after August 1, 1996, in inverse order of maturity and by lot within
each maturity. [[Premium is one-quarter of 1 percent for each year
or portion of a year from date of redemption to date of maturity, but
not more than 2 percent.]]
Registration: The certificates are issued as fully registered certificates
with provision for transfer.
Payment: Interest is payable by check mailed to the registered owner;
principal is payable at Bank of America National Trust and Savings
Association, Los Angeles, California.
Tax Exemption: In the opinion of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander &
Ferdon, Los Angeles, California, and Rourke & Woodruff, Orange,
California, co-bond counsel, under existing laws, regulations, rulings,
and judicial decisions, the interest portion of the installment payments
made by the agency and received by the certificate holders is exempt
from income taxation by the United States of America and from personal
income taxation unposed by the State of California.
Security: Each certificate represents a proportionate interest in the
right to receive installment payments made by the Districts to the
trustee under the acquisition agreement. The acquisition agreement
terminates upon payment by the Districts of all installment payments
as due upon prepayment of the remaining installment payments.
Installment payments must be paid from any source of available funds
of the Districts, and the Districts covenant to establish and collect
sewer revenues sufficient, with all other legally available funds, to
pay their installment payments, to include all installment payments in
their annual budgets, and to annually appropriate such funds.
OS57E-3
The obligation of each District to make the installment payments and
the interest thereon, from and to the extent of all sources of legally
available moneys of each such District, is absolute and unconditional.
The Districts will not, under any circumstances, discontinue or
suspend any installment payment or any interest thereon, whether or
not the project or any part thereof is operating or operable or has
been completed, or whether or not the project is condemned or seized
or its use is suspended, interfered with, reduced, or curtailed or
terminated in whole or in part. The payments are not subject to
reduction whether by offset, abatement, suspension, deferment, or
otherwise, and are not conditional upon the performance or
nonperformance by any party of any agreement or covenant contained
herein for any cause whatsoever.
Each District is obligated hereunder only to the extent of its
installment payments, and is not obligated to pay any obligation of
any other District.
Additional Security: As additional security for the payment of
installment payments, each District agrees to deliver to District No. 1,
and District No. 1 agrees to hold in trust as fiduciary and agent for
the other Districts, an installment payment priority fund. This fund
shall be established from amounts currently in District reserves, and
shall be held solely to secure prompt payment of each District's
installment payments.
Pur ose: Certificate proceeds will be used to finance improvements to
the Districts' joint sewage treatment and disposal facilities.
Reserve Fund: The reserve fund established by the trust agreement
is required to be funded from proceeds of the certificates, equal to
10 percent of the principal amount of the issue and will be held by
the trustee.
All of the reserve fund secures all of the certificates. If funds are
withdrawn from the reserve fund as a result of nonpayment of
delinquency by one or more of the Districts, that District will be
a.i obligated to replenish all draws on the reserve fund on its behalf,
OS57E-9
and covenants to establish and collect rates and charges sufficient, in
conjunction with all other available revenues and funds, to repay
such reserve fund advances.
Additional Certificates: The Districts will issue no additional
certificates prior to August 1, 1987, and then only subject to the
terms of the acquisition agreement.
Pending Federal Tax Legislation
==text to come
Sale of the Certificates
The initial offering of these certificates is made in accordance with
the notice of sale. Matters discussed in this section are expressly u
subject to the terms and conditions of said notice, to which reference
should be made for further detail.
Legal Opinion
The legal opinion of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, Los
Angeles, California, and Rourke & Woodruff, Orange, California,
co-bond counsel, will be furnished to the successful bidder and
printed on each certificate at the Districts' expense.
The statements of law and legal conclusions set forth in this official
statement under the headings "The Certificates," "The Acquisition
Agreement," and "The Trust Agreement" have been reviewed by bond
counsel. Bond counsel's employment is limited to a review of the
legal procedures required for the certificates and to rendering an
opinion as to the validity of the certificates and the exemption of
interest on the certificates from income taxation. The opinion of bond `/
OS57E-5
counsel will not consider or extend to any documents which bond
counsel did not prepare or review or to any agreements,
representations, offering circulars, or other material of any kind
concerning the certificates not mentioned in this paragraph.
Closing Documents
At the time of delivery of the certificates to the successful bidder,
the Districts will furnish the following documents:
❑ No-Litigation Certificate: A certificate of counsel to the
SisVicts certifpm�t there is no direct litigation pending
affecting the validity of the acquisition agreement or the
certificates.
❑ Signature Certificate: A certificate of the appropriate officer of
etTi trustee, IndcaUng that he has signed the certificates by
manual or facsimile signature and that he was duly authorized
to so execute or authenticate the same.
❑ Trustee's and Treasurer's Recei ts: The receipts of the
trustee an a isirIc treasurer showing that the purchase
price of the certificates, including accrued interest to the date
�.s of delivery, has been received by the Districts and the trustee,
respectively.
❑ Certificate Concernin Official Statement: A certificate of an
appropriate o icer o e tstrIcts, to the effect that to the
best of such officer's knowledge and belief, and after
reasonable investigation: (a) neither the official statement nor
any amendment or supplement thereto contains any untrue
statement of a material fact or omits to state any material fact
necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances in which they were made, not misleading; and
(b) since the date of the official statement no event has
occurred which should have been set forth in an amendment or
supplement to the official statement which has not been so set
forth.
❑ Non-Arbitrage Certificate: A certificate of a responsible officer
0 bistr�cts certifying that, on the basis of the facts,
estimates, and circumstances in effect at the time of delivery of
the certificates, it is not expected that the proceeds of the
certificates will be used in a manner that will cause the
installment sale agreement to be an arbitrage bond.
OS57J-1
The Acquisition Agreement
The Agreement for the Acquisition and Construction of Joint Facilities
(the "acquisition agreement"), dated as of August 1, 1986, is by and
among County Sanitation Districts, Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 19 (the
"Districts"). Under the acquisition agreement each District agrees to
acquire the project and to pay its share of the costs by making
installment payments and other payments required by the agreement.
Each District assigns to the trustee its rights to the payments made
under the acquisition agreement by each other District. The trustee
will, as provided in the trust agreement, deliver the certificates,
each of which will evidence a direct and proportionate share of the
payments to be made by each District under the acquisition
agreement.
Installment Payments
Each District agrees to pay installment payments to the trustee in the
amounts and at the times provided in the acquisition agreement. The
total aggregate amount of the installment payments is the aggregate
principal amount of $ , equivalent to the principal
amount of the certificates. Each installment payment will bear
interest at the rates set forth in the executed acquisition agreement,
to be based on the interest rates on the certificates.
Installment payments are due in two semiannual payments of principal
and interest, payable to the trustee on each January 26 and July 26,
beginning January 26, 1987. Installment payments will be made from
the capitalized interest account to the extent such account has been
funded for each District.
Each District's obligation is payable solely from any source of its
legally available funds. Each District agrees that its obligation to the
other Districts to make its installment payments will be assigned by �../
OS57J-2
the other Districts to the trustee as security for and as the source of
payment for the certificates. Each District is obligated only to the
extent of its installment payments, and is not obligated to pay any
obligation of any other District.
The obligation of each District to pay the installment payments and
the interest thereon, from and to the extent of all sources of legally
available moneys of each District, is absolute and unconditional. The
Districts will not, under any circumstances, discontinue or suspend
any installment payment or interest thereon, whether or not the
project or any part thereof is operating or operable or has been
completed, or whether or not the project is condemned or seized or
its use is suspended, interfered with, reduced, or curtailed or
terminated in whole or in part. The payments are not subject to
reduction whether by offset, abatement, suspension, deferment, or
otherwise, and are not conditional upon the performance or
nonperformance by any party of any agreement or covenant in the
acquisition agreement for any cause whatsoever.
Legally Available Funds
Each District's installment payments will be paid from any source of
legally available funds of the District, and the Districts hereby
covenant to take such action as may be necessary to include all
installment payments and other amounts due under the acquisition
agreement in their annual budgets. Each District also agrees to make
the necessary annual appropriations for all installment payments. The
covenants of the Districts are ministerial duties imposed by law, and
it is the duty of each District public official to take the action
necessary to enable the District to carry out and perform these
covenants.
Each District agrees to fix, prescribe, and collect rates and charges
for its service which are reasonable and fair and which, when
combined with other revenues and funds on hand and available for
such purposes, will be sufficient to yield legally available moneys at
OS57J-3
least equal to the installment payments coming due in each fiscal
year. Each District's ability to properly manage its expenses and to
increase its revenues is essential to the payment and security of its
installment payments and the interest thereon. Accordingly, each
District covenants that, unless funds are otherwise available therefor,
the District will proceed to create capital reserves, issue bonds, or
execute contracts to finance the costs of additions, extensions, and
improvements to the joint and District facilities to satisfy the sewer
service demands placed upon it.
Option to Prepay
Each District may prepay any of its installment payments from the net
proceeds of insurance or condemnation awards. Such prepayments
must be made in multiples of $5,000, plus interest thereon, and
accrued and unpaid interest to the date of prepayment. Such
prepayments shall apply to unpaid installment payments in inverse
order of their due dates.
Each District may prepay its installment payments due on or after
August 1, 1997 on any interest payment date on or after August 1,
1996, in full or in part in an amount not less than $20,000.
Notwithstanding any prepayments, each District is not relieved of its
obligations under the acquisition agreement until the entire principal
amount of its unpaid installment payments plus interest has been fully
paid.
Insurance
Each District agrees to procure and maintain insurance on its
enterprise with responsible insurers, to the extent commercially
available at reasonable cost, in such amounts and against such risks
as are usually covered in connection with similar sewer systems.
In the event of any damage to or destruction of its enterprise
os577-4
covered by insurance, the net insurance proceeds will be applied to
the reconstruction, repair, or replacement of the damaged or
destroyed facilities. If such net proceeds exceed the costs of such
reconstruction, repair, or replacement, the excess will be applied to
the prepayment of the Districts' installment payments. If such net
proceeds are sufficient to enable the District to retire its entire
obligation under the acquisition agreement, the District so affected
may elect not to reconstruct, repair, or replace the damaged or
destroyed facilities, and to apply the funds to the prepayment of its
installment payments.
Any insurance may be maintained under a self-insurance program so
long as such self-insurance is maintained in the amounts and manner
usually maintained in connection with similar sewer systems.
Covenants
Each District makes a variety of covenants in the acquisition
agreement, in addition to those described elsewhere in this section,
including the following:
❑ To punctually pay its installment payments and the interest
thereon.
❑ To faithfully observe and perform all agreements, conditions,
covenants, and terms of the acquisition agreement and the
trust agreement, and to not terminate the acquisition
agreement for any cause whatsoever.
❑ To not make any pledge of or place any lien on the net
enterprise revenues.
❑ To not sell, lease, or otherwise dispose of its enterprise or
any part thereof essential to the enterprise's proper operation;
provided that any property which has become inoperative or
unnecessary may be disposed of at not less than its market
value.
❑ To not enter into any agreement or lease which impairs the
operation of its enterprise or any part thereof necessary to
secure adequate moneys legally available for the payment of
the installment payments or the interest thereon.
oss77-s
❑ To not, to the extent permitted by law, acquire, maintain, or
operate, nor to permit any other public or private agency to
acquire, maintain, or operate within its boundaries any
competitive sanitary sewer system.
❑ To not make any use of the proceeds of the obligation
provided in the acquisition agreement or any other funds of
the District which will cause the obligation to be an arbitrage
bond, a consumer loan bond, or a federally guaranteed
obligation, as such terms are defined in the Internal Revenue
Code, and to comply with all applicable requirements and
regulations in effect.
❑ To not use or permit the use of the project or its output by
any person not an "exempt person" or by an "exempt person"
in an "unrelated trade or business" as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code in such a manner as would result in the loss of
federal income tax exemption.
❑ District No. 1, as agent for the other Districts, agrees to
cause the acquisition of the project in an expeditious manner
and in conformity with the law.
❑ To maintain and preserve its enterprise in good repair and
working order, and to operate it in an efficient and economical
manner, and to pay all operation and maintenance costs as
they become due.
❑ To file financial reports with the trustee annually. u
❑ To pay and discharge any and all legal claims for labor,
materials, or supplies, which, if unpaid, might become a lien
on its net enterprise revenues or on any District funds prior
or superior to the lien of the installment payments.
❑ To comply with all agreements, conditions, covenants, and
terms required to be performed in all contracts for the use of
or involving its enterprise.
❑ To keep appropriate accounting records, and to file them as
required with the trustee.
❑ To preserve and protect the security and rights of each of the
Districts to its installment payments and the interest thereon,
and to warrant such rights against all claims and demands of
all persons.
❑ To pay and discharge all taxes, assessments, and other
governmental charges which may thereafter be lawfully imposed
upon its enterprise or the gross revenues thereof.
❑ To observe and conform with all valid regulations and
requirements of any governmental authority relative to the
operation of its enterprise or any part thereof.
OS577-6
❑ To have in effect at all times rules and regulations requiring
each customer connected to the enterprise to pay the rates and
charges applicable for sewer service.
❑ To apply any eminent domain proceeds as specified in the
acquisition agreement.
❑ To make any further assurance reasonably necessary or proper
to facilitate performance under the acquisition agreement.
Default and Remedies
The following constitute events of default under the acquisition
agreement:
❑ Default in the due and punctual payment by any District of
any installment payment.
❑ Default by any District in the performance of any of the
agreements or covenants in the acquisition agreement, which
default has continued for a period of 30 days after written
notice by another District or the trustee.
❑ Filing by any District of a petition seeking arrangement or
reorganization under federal bankruptcy laws or any other
such applicable law.
❑ Default on any District contract or bond and the outstanding
principal amount of such contract or bond has been declared
immediately due and payable.
An event of default with respect to one District shall not, in and of
itself, constitute or result in an event of default by any other
District. Upon the occurrence and continuance of any such event of
default, any of the other Districts or the trustee may, and upon the
filing for bankruptcy shall, declare the entire amount of installment
payments and interest thereon to be due and payable immediately.
In any event except the filing for bankruptcy, after the entire
amount of installment payments and accrued interest thereon have
been so declared due and payable, if the District deposits with the
trustee a sum sufficient to pay the delinquent amounts with interest
on the overdue installments and the reasonable expenses of the
trustee, the trustee may rescind and annul such declaration and its
consequences.
oss7J-7
Upon acceleration, all money in such District's installment payment
account and the reserve fund, and in all other funds and accounts
attributable to the District held by the trustee shall be applied in the
following order:
❑ To the payment of the costs and expenses of the other
Districts and the trustee in carrying out its activities in the
default.
❑ To the payment of the accrued interest on the principal amount
of the District's unpaid installment payments.
o To the payment of the entire principal amount of the District's
unpaid installment payments.
In addition to all other remedies, the Districts or the trustee have
the right to take any legal actions to compel the District to carry out
its duties, to enjoin unlawful actions, and to require the District to
account as the trustee of an express trust.
oss7x-1
�./ The Trust Agreemenr
The trust agreement, dated as of August 1, 1986, is an agreement by
and among the trustee, the paying agent, and the Districts. It
establishes the terms and conditions of the certificates, the funds and
accounts, the covenants of the Districts, the appointment and duties
of the trustee and the paying agent, and the remedies available to
the trustee and the certificate owners.
Trustee
The Districts appoint as trustee, to
receive, deposit, and disburse the installment payments and the
interest thereon; to prepare, execute, and deliver and transfer the
certificates; and to perform the other functions in the trust
agreement. The trustee may be removed and replaced under the terms
of the trust agreement. The trustee shall at all times appoint and
maintain a paying agent upon such terms and conditions as may be
mutually agreed by the trustee, each District, and the paying agent.
Creation of Funds
The trust agreement establishes funds for the deposit of revenues
and proceeds of the certificates. [[All funds are held by the
trustee.]]
❑ Acquisition Fund: To pay acquisition and construction costs
oFWe project.
❑ Installment Pa ment Fund: To receive installment payments
pa y t e istr�cts to the trustee and to pay principal and
interest on the certificates when due.
❑ Prepayment Fund: To receive funds for and pay the costs of
prepayment of the certificates.
OS57K-2 .
❑ Reserve Fund: To secure timely payment of principal and
interest on die certificates when due.
All funds [[except the reserve fund]] contain a separate account for
each District.
Application of Proceeds
The trust agreement provides for the application of proceeds of the
certificates. An amount equal to 10 percent of the original principal
amount of the certificates will be deposited in the reserve fund. An
amount equal to the capitalized interest for each District for which
interest is capitalized will be deposited in that District's installment
payment account in the installment payment fund. The balance of the
proceeds of the certificates will be deposited in each District's
acquisition account in the acquisition fund.
Moneys held by the trustee in all funds will be invested in any
investments permitted to the Districts under California law. All
interest earnings on invested funds accrue to the respective fund or
account from which the investment was made. [[Transfer to
installment payments once requirements of other funds satisfied]]
Use of Money in Funds
Acquisition Fund: Amounts in each acquisition account will be
disbursed by the trustee to pay each District's share of the cost of
the acquisition and construction of its interest in the project. The
trustee will make disbursements upon receipt of payment requests
from the Districts. The requests must state the payee, the amount,
the purpose for which the obligation was incurred, and the particular
items to be paid for. In addition, the request shall state that the
District delivering the request is authorized to do so, that the
obligation has been properly incurred and is a proper charge to the
acquisition fund under the acquisition agreement, and that no District
has been served with a stop notice or any other notice of lien.
OS57K-3
When the acquisition of the project has been completed, District No. 1
as agent for the other Districts will deliver a certificate to the
. `/
trustee stating the date of the completion and stating
. Upon the receipt of the certificate of
completion, the trustee will transfer any remaining balance in the
acquisition fund to the prepayment fund, for the prepayment of
certificates. [[how about I.P. fund?]]
Installment Payment Fund: The trustee will deposit in each District's
installment payment account all installment payments received from
such District and any other amounts required by the acquisition
agreement or the trust agreement. From the proceeds of the sale of
the certificates, the trustee will deposit in the capitalized interest
subaccount of each District's installment payment account the amount
of such District's funded interest deposit. The trustee will withdraw
from each District's installment payment account on each payment date
an amount equal to the installment payments due from that District.
All sums withdrawn from the installment payment accounts will be
deposited in the certificate payment account.
es
Certificate Payment Account: The trustee will withdraw from the
certificate payment account on each payment date an amount equal to
the interest and principal due on the certificates on that date, and
will apply the funds to the payment of principal and interest to the
certificate owners. [[If on any payment date the balance in the
certificate payment account is less than the amount of principal and
interest due to the certificate owners, the trustee will apply the
money in the certificate payment account to the payment of interest
on installment payments of the District from whose installment payment
accounts such moneys were withdrawn, but only to the extent of such
withdrawals, and, with respect to each such District's installment
payments, first to the payment of interest past due, pro rate if
necessary, and then to the payment of principal past due, pro rata
if necessary.]]
Reserve Fund: The reserve fund is to be maintained at a level equal
to the reserve requirement, 10 percent of the original certificate issue.
..i If, on any payment date, the amount in the installment payment account
OS57K-4
is less than the installment payments then due, the trustee will
immediately transfer moneys from the reserve fund to the installment
payment account to make up such deficiency. Upon receipt of
delinquent installment payments from such District, the reserve fund
will be replenished.
[[All certificates are equally and ratably secured by the full amount
in the reserve fund. Withdrawals from the reserve fund resulting
from the delinquency or nonpayment of each District will be charged
to that District. Each District covenants to levy and collect fees and
charges as required to replenish any withdrawals from the reserve
fund on its behalf, as well as to meet all of its other obligations
under the acquisition agreement and the trust agreement.]]
At any time that the balance in the reserve fund and the installment
payment fund equal all installment payments remaining due, the
trustee shall transfer all amounts in the reserve fund to the
respective installment payment accounts to be applied to the payment
of the installment payments as they become due, and the Districts
shall be deemed to have paid all installment payments due under the
acquisition agreement.
Covenants
The trust agreement includes covenants by the Districts for the
protection of the certificate owners and the security of the certificates,
including the following:
❑ To faithfully comply with and perform all the agreements,
conditions, covenants, and terms of the trust agreement and
the acquisition agreement.
❑ To not modify the acquisition agreement without the prior
written consent of the trustee, which consent shall be given
only if, in the opinion of the trustee, such modifications will
not result in any material impairment of the security for the
payment of the installment payments, or if the trustee receives
written consents by the holders of 60 percent in aggregate
principal amount of the certificates.
OS57K-5
❑ To faithfully comply with all valid and lawful obligations or
regulations now or hereafter imposed on them by contract or
law.
❑ To keep the project free from judgments, liens, and encumbrances
which might hamper each District in conducting its business or
using the project.
❑ To not create or allow to be created, so long as any certificates
are outstanding, any pledge of or lien on the installment
payments other than as permitted by the trust agreement or
the assignment agreement.
❑ To take such action from time to time as may be necessary or
proper to remedy or cure any cloud upon the title to the
project.
❑ To defend against every action, suit, or other proceeding at
any time brought against the trustee or the paying agent or
any certificate owner upon any claim arising out of the receipt,
deposit, or disbursement of any of the installment payments or
involving the rights of the trustee or the paying agent or any
certificate owner.
o To file and record any documents required by law to maintain
the acquisition agreement and the trust agreement as a security
interest in the installment payment.
❑ To execute and deliver all such other and further assurances,
and to promptly do or cause to be done all such other things
as may be necessary or reasonably required to more fully vest
in the trustee and the certificate holders all rights conferred
upon them by the acquisition agreement or the assignment
agreement.
Default and Remedies
Any event of default under the acquisition agreement also constitutes
an event of default under the trust agreement. During the continuance
of such event of default, the trustee or the owners of not less than a
majority in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding certificates
shall, upon written notice to each District and the paying agent, exercise
the remedies provided to the Districts in the acquisition agreement.
In the event the entire principal amount of the unpaid installment
payments of a District and the accrued interest thereon shall be
declared due and payable, the trustee shall declare the principal of
�..i an interest on a proportionate amount of the certificates immediately
due and payable.
OS57K-6
The trustee has the right to take any legal actions to compel the
Districts to carry out their duties, to enjoin unlawful actions, and to
require the Districts to account as the trustee of an express trust.
Amendment
The trust agreement may be amended with the written consent of the
owners of 60 percent of the aggregate principal amount of the
certificates. No amendment shall (i) reduce the rate of interest on
any certificate or extend the time of payment for such interest or
reduce the amount of principal evidenced by any certificate without
the prior written consent of the owners of the certificates so
affected, (h) reduce the percentage of owners whose consent is
required for the execution of any amendment to the trust agreement,
or (iii) modify any of the rights or obligations of the trustee without
its prior written consent.
The trust agreement and the rights and obligations of each District,
the certificate owners, and the trustee may be amended or
supplemented at any time without the written consents of the owners,
but only to the extent permitted by law, after receipt of an
approving opinion of counsel, and only to cure any ambiguity or
defective provision or to clarify any questions not inconsistent with
the trust agreement and which will not adversely affect the interests
of the certificate owners.
OS57C-1
The Districts
Introduction
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are nine special
districts, organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act
(Health & Safety Code §9700ff). The Districts are successors to the
Joint Outfall Sewer Organization, which was formed in 1923 among the
Cities of Anaheim, Santa Ana, Fullerton, and Orange, and the
sanitary districts of Placentia, Buena Park, La Habra, and Garden
Grove. The Joint Outfall Sewer Organization constructed a treatment
plant and outfall in the early twenties to serve its members. It was -
reorganized in 1947 and 1948 into seven county sanitation
districts--Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11. Two additional
Districts exist today: District No. 13 was formed in 1985 and District
No. 19 in 1986. Table 1 provides selected statistics on each of the
nine Districts.
�..i The Districts are "wholesale" agencies, responsible for transmission,
treatment, and disposal throughout their combined territories, which
include most of the population of Orange County. They receive
wastewater from the collection systems of the cities and sanitary
districts. Only District No. 7, which includes much unincorporated
area, provides retail service directly to individual customers.
Organization and Administration
Each District has its own board of directors, made up of members of
city councils, special districts, and the county board of supervisors,
under the provisions of the County Sanitation District Act. An
individual may serve on more than one District's board if parts of his
agency lie within more than one District. Each board is responsible
for matters related to its District, and the directors meet as a joint
board on matters of joint interest and responsibility. A variety of
board committees, made up of members of the joint board, considers
topics for action by the joint board and makes recommendations to the
OS57C-2
joint board. Individual Districts' responsibilities cannot be decided
by the joint board, but only by the individual Districts' boards.
The Districts share a common administrative staff, with offices located
adjacent to the Fountain Valley treatment plant. The Districts employ
an administrative and operating staff of about , under the
direction of a general manager. J. Wayne Sylvester has been general
manager since 19 Prior to that time he served as the
Districts' director of finance. He has been employed by the Districts
for 28 years.
William H. Butler is the Districts' director of finance. He has been
with the Districts for years. Prior to coming to the Districts
he worked for a national accounting firm.
Thomas . Dawes is the Districts' director of engineering and
has been employed by the Districts since 19
District Service Areas
The map (=location flag=) shows the District boundaries and the cities
located in each District. District boundaries were originally
established in 1947 and 1948, based on drainage basins. As the
existing cities have grown and new areas have incorporated, city
limits have come to overlap District boundaries. Table 2 lists the
cities and special districts included within each District. All Districts
include county territory that lies in neither a city or another special
district.
Districts' Facilities
The Districts provide sewage treatment and disposal in metropolitan
Orange County, through the third-largest wastewater treatment
system on the West Coast. It currently serves a population of
1.8 million and has facilities worth more than $750 million. The
service area's population is expected to grow to 2.5 million by the �./
OS57C-3
year 2000. As population and urban development increases, the
Districts plan and construct facilities to provide the necessary
wastewater disposal services.
Each District owns its District collection system and its proportionate
share of the joint works--major transmission, treatment, and disposal
facilities. The nine Districts own and maintain more than 600 miles of
major trunk sewers, 200 mile of subtrunks, and 33 pump stations.
The Districts operate two treatment plants, which treat the
wastewater to strict state and federal standards before discharge five
miles out to sea.
❑ Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley, about four miles
ro�lie—coast, adjacent to the bed of the Santa Ana River,
and has an operational hydraulic capacity of 60 million gallons.
The plant provides primary and secondary treatment of all of
its flow. Some of its secondary treated water goes to an
Orange County Water District tertiary treatment plant for an
intrusion barrier project and greenbelt irrigation.
❑ Plant No. 2 is located in Huntington Beach, 1,500 feet from
e ocean at the mouth of the Santa Ana River. It can handle
a hydraulic load of 184 million gallons per day. The plant
provides primary treatment to the 172 million gallons per day
(mgd) that enters the plant, and secondary treatment to
75 mgd.
Both treatment plants discharge their effluent through outfall booster
facilities, which pump the treated flow through a five-mile ocean
outfall, with a hydraulic capacity of 480 mgd.
Joint Works Planning and Construction
The Districts' existing joint treatment works have a rated design
capacity of Z32 million gallons per day (mgd). All capacity is
currently needed to handle current flows; there is no standby
capacity. Average flow rates at both plants are expected to increase
to 270 mgd by 1987/88, a 16 percent increase, and to 307 mgd by
2002/03, up 33 percent from the 1986 flow.
Water and air pollution regulatory agencies require that all wastewater
facilities be designed to meet the needs of anticipated growth and
OS57C-4
provide a reasonable reserve capacity. Immediate improvements to the
Districts' facilities are needed to provide additional treatment and
hydraulic capacity to accommodate the service area's growing
population. The Districts should also have standby capacity of
12 mgd at Plant No. 1, and 24 mgd at Plant No. 2.
The Districts have developed and approved a joint works master plan,
which identifies projects needed to provide wastewater treatment over
the next five years. The Districts will meet these demands through
an ongoing construction program. In addition to the master plan,
studies on odor control and digester gas utilization were prepared and
approved.
Some of the projects included in the master plan and other studies
are:
❑ Construction of a new headworks and additional primary
clarification and digestion capacity at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
to begin in 1987.
❑ Replacement of headworks pumps and construction of a new
600 mgd outfall booster pump station at Treatment Plant No. 2.
These improvements are being designed.
❑ Odor control facilities at both treatment plants. Work on these
facilities has begun, and various projects are in either a
design or construction stage.
❑ Central generation facilities which will provide a centralized
means of generating electrical power from digester gas, more
efficient use of waste heat, and more effective, less costly
means of complying with air pollution control regulations. The
plan will reduce air pollution and will reduce the costs of
purchased power by $4 million per year.
Table 3 lists the major joint works construction projects included in
the 1986/87 budgets and the projected budgets for the following fiscal
years. The costs are allocated to each District in Table 4. The
largest individual projects, in terms of expenditure, are described
below:
❑ Headworks - Headworks will be enlarged at both treatment
p ants. t Plant No. 1 a new influent sewage pumping plant
will be constructed, capable of pumping an average flow of 140
million gallons per day (mgd). This will approximately triple
the plant's current influent pumping capacity of 75 mgd.
OS57C-5
❑ Pum R_ _� - Pumps will be replaced in the Plant No. 2
headwo�r s
�.s ❑ Central Power Generation - Each treatment plant is equipped
with facilities to use a gas produced in the sewage treatment
process to generate electricity. Improvements to these
facilities will increase the power generated in the treatment
plant, improve efficiency, and reduce power purchase costs.
❑ Substation Construction - The Districts currently buy 12 kV
power from Southern alifornia Edision. Construction of 69 kV
substations at both treatment plants will allow the Districts to
buy 69 kV power, which is less expensive and more readily
available.
Other expenditures planned for the upcoming three years include
installation of a duplicate electrical system to provide reliability, and
a variety of rehabilitation, replacement, and expansion of individual
plant elements. Projects scheduled for near-term construction are
designed primarily to reduce operating costs and increase reliability.
They include expansion of the plants' influent and effluent handling
capacity. Expansion of the major treatment elements will follow in the
next phase of projects, once the plants have the ability to handle the
increased hydraulic flows.
Cost Allocation
Each of the Districts owns an undivided interest in the joint treatment
and disposal facilities. Each District is required to pay to the joint
operating fund its share of the administrative expenses and the costs
of operating the joint works. Each District is charged and pays
these charges in direct proportion to its annual gallonage flows.
Flows from each District are metered. If, for any reason, flow
cannot be metered, flows can be determined by field measurement, or
by estimating the current population and the per capita discharge of
domestic sewage and the total flow of industrial waste from the area
in question.
Each year ownership interest in the joint works is adjusted among the
Districts. Ownership interest is based on the mathematical average of
flows for the three preceding years. After each District's annual
ownership percentage is determined, that percentage is applied to the
total capital investment in the joint works.
OS57C-6
The costs of new joint works construction is allocated to each of the
Districts in accordance with each District's ownership interest as of
the date of the construction contract. �../
Table 4 summarizes each District's share of the joint works project
expenditures in Table 2, based on the 1986/87 ownership interests.
Table 5 includes the costs of District collection facilities.
Secondary Treatment Waiver
The 1972 Federal Clean Water Act required full secondary treatment
for all municipal dischargers nationwide. The act was amended in
1977 to include the 301(h) waiver provisions, which allow publicly
owned treatment plants to discharge flow to the ocean without
providing full secondary treatment if they can demonstrate, to the
satisfaction of the administrator of the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), that significant adverse environmental impacts will not
occur.
The Districts applied for such a waiver, and it was granted as of
April 1, 1985 by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board
and the EPA. The waiver was issued because of the Districts'
demonstrated ability to meet the stringent discharge requirements and
the District boards' commitinent to an extensive monitoring program to
ensure that the ocean waters off the Orange County coast will be
protected.
The waiver required the Districts to increase the removal of
suspended solids from 50 percent to 75 percent and biochemical
oxygen demand from 35 percent to 60 percent in the final effluent.
The Districts have completed construction of $124 million advanced
secondary treatment facilities at both plants to comply with the
waiver's strict requirements.
Receipt of the 301(h) waiver has saved the Districts $142 million in
additional facilities construction costs and $5 to $7 million in ongoing
annual operating costs. It also avoids the necessity of handling and �./
OS57C-7
disposing of the increased volumes of sludge associated with full
secondary treatment. A major requirement of the waiver, over its
five-year term, is a comprehensive ocean monitoring program. This
program costs the Districts $1 million per year, and is designed to
evaluate the effects of ocean discharge on the marine environment.
The waiver was issued in 1985 for five years. At the end of its term
it may or may not be renewed, at the discretion of the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board and the EPA. In the event the
301(h) waiver is not reissued in 1990, the Districts will face
substantial capital costs for treatment facilities in order to provide
full secondary treatment of all effluent. District staff estimates the
capital costs of full secondary treatment at $339 million for the
five-year period beginning in 1991.
OS57DD-1
APPENDIX
Tables Al through A15 are extracted from the Districts' annual financial
statements for the years 1980/81 through 1984/85, and provide historical
financial information on the Districts.
OS57K-7
a.i The Financing Program
-[new section to come]
Participating Districts
=[text to come]
Allocation of Proceeds
=[text to come]
District Cash Flows
=[text to come]
Sources of Installment Payments
The annual payments required of the participating Districts under the
acquisition agreement are payable from any unrestricted revenues or
assets of the respective participating Districts. The agreement
constitutes a legal, valid, and binding instrument, and the obligation
of each District to pay each year's payment under the agreement
during its term will be valid and enforceable under California law.
Annual payments from each District will be made from fund balances
in its capital fund, to the extent such balances are available and not
committed to specific construction projects.
The Districts have the power to establish rates and charges for the
use and availability of their facilities as needed. Such charges are
established by the Districts' boards of directors and are not subject
to review or approval by any other agencies.
OS57K-8
Those Districts which have instituted supplemental user fees to date
have collected those fees on the annual property tax bill sent out by
the Orange County Tax Collector. Use of this collection method
requires that, when the fee is initially established, the District advise
each property owner in writing of its intention to establish such a fee
and to collect it on the property tax bill. The District board must
then hold a public hearing on the establishment of the user fee.
Following the public hearing the board can establish the fee.
Establishment and collection of the user fee in this manner establishes
a lien on the property for the sewer user fee equivalent to the lien of
the property taxes. Following the notification and public hearing
requirement that accompanies the initial establishment of the fee, the
Districts may amend the fee as necessary in the future without any
similar notification or hearing requirements.
The Districts also have the power to establish and collect annexation
fees from properties annexing to the Districts and connection charges
from customers connecting to the Districts' facilities.
In addition to funds on hand and the ability to establish fees, the
Districts will establish an installment payment priority fund, discussed
below.
Instalment Payment Priority Fund
=[text to come]
OS57H-1
Participating Districts' Finances
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 19 are parties to
the joint borrowing and trust agreements for the certificates currently
being offered. Each district is a separate and distinct financial
entity, with its own assessed valuation, rates and charges, financial
reports, and policies.
The Districts' accounts are maintained under the State of California
Controller's Uniform System of Accounts for Waste Disposal Districts.
An annual report of financial transactions is filed with the Controller
of the State of California for each District, in compliance with Section
53891 of the California Government Code. Each of the Districts
operates as an enterprise activity. The accounts supporting the
financial statements are maintained on an accrual basis. The
Districts' financial statements are audited annually by an independent
certified public accountant. Copies of the audited financial statements
o.i are available from the Districts upon request.
Tables Al through A15, included as an appendix to this official
statement, are extracted from the Districts' financial statements, and
provide historical information on the participating Districts' financial
operations.
Reserves
The Districts as a whole have substantial cash balances, which have
been accumulated over many years. The Districts designate various
sources of funds, discussed below, as capital and operating funds,
and account for operating and capital reserves based on the
respective sources of funds.
The operating and capital fund reserves for the participating Districts
as of July 1, 1986 are shown in Table 13.
OS57H-2
While the Districts have substantial reserves at this time, they also
face very substantial expenditures in the next five- and ten-year
periods, as discussed in prior sections of this official statement.
Revenues and Expenses
The Districts have several sources of revenue. The emphasis on a
particular revenue source varies from District to District, as shown in
Table 14. Table 14 was developed by Bartle Wells Associates from
estimates in District budgets to reflect the operating and capital
funds maintained by each District. Statements of operations and
retained earnings from the Districts' audited financial statements are
included in Tables Al through A5.
Property Taxes: Each of the participating Districts except the
recently formed District No. 14 receives a share of the general
1 percent county property tax levy.
Prior to the passage of Proposition 13 in June 1978, each District
established an annual property tax, both to pay its operating
expenses and to pay debt service on outstanding general obligation
bonds. Proposition 13 limited taxes for purposes other than general
obligation debt service to 1 percent of the market value of property
as determined by the county assessment roll. Implementing legislation
provided for the allocation to local agencies of property taxes levied
within the 1 percent limit. Property taxes have increased annually in
each District. The average annual increase in property tax revenues
from 1980/81 through 1984/85 has varied from 4.5 percent in District
No. 3 to 22 percent in District No. 6.
Recipients of California state and EPA Clean Water grants are
required to prepare, and receive state approval of, a revenue
program which establishes financial policies for the payment of sewer
expenses. The revenue program must demonstrate that:
❑ Revenues will meet or exceed expenses on an annual basis.
❑ Customers pay the sewer system's expenses in proportion to
the demand they place on the system.
❑ Provision is made for capital replacement and future capital
needs.
OS57H-3
The CSDOC revenue program, approved by the State Water Quality
Control Board, dedicates the property taxes received under the
e/ Districts' allocation of the general county taxes to each District's
operating fund.
Supplemental User Fees: Districts Nos. 1, 5, 6, and 14 levy
supplemental user fees in amounts ranging from $26.40 to $
per year per single-family dwelling, as shown in Table 1. The
Districts have established supplemental user fees as their operating
expenses have grown faster than their property tax revenues
available for operations.
The Districts initially establish their supplemental user fees by public
hearing, following written notice to all property owners in the
respective District. The fees are collected annually on the property
tax bills in conjunction with general property taxes, as described
under the heading "Sources of Installment Payments"
Districts Nos. 2 and 3 currently have no supplemental user charges.
These are the two largest Districts, both in area and in number of
customers. In both Districts, property tax revenues are growing
more slowly than operating expenses, so the Districts may in the
future face the need to implement supplemental user fees.
Implementation of these fees requires substantial staff work as well as
property owner notification and public hearing, and cooperation with
the county tax collector to add the appropriate user fee to the tax
bill. The planning for the initial establishment of a user fee takes
place in the year before the charge is implemented.
Once the supplemental user fee has been established, the respective
District boards have the authority to amend the amount of the charge
by ordinance, which is effective upon its issuance. No additional
public hearing or property owner notification is required.
Industrial Waste Fees: All of the Districts charge industrial waste
fees to customers discharging high-strength or high-volume wastes
into the sewer systems. Customers subject to industrial waste fees
are billed directly by the Districts' staff. The fee charged to each
OS57H-4
customer is based on the customer's sewage volume and the
concentration of suspended solids and biological oxygen demand, and
includes a credit for the property taxes paid by the customer to the
Districts.
In 1985 the Districts' industrial waste staff took over 2,000 samples of
wastewater from industrial customers. Total industrial waste fees in
1985 were $7.4 million throughout the eight Districts existing at the
time.
Industrial waste fees are applied to both the operating and capital
funds. Seventy percent of the fee goes into the Districts' operating
funds, and the remaining 30 percent is deposited into the capital
funds.
Connection Charges: All Districts have adopted a sewer connection
fee schedule. The fees in place vary from $ per single-family
dwelling in District No. to $ in District No. , as
shown in Table 1. Connection fees go into each District's capital
fund. �.
Federal and State Grants: Federal and state grants have constituted
a substantial revenue source to the Districts' capital funds over the
past several years. Grant revenues received are distributed to the
various Districts in proportion to their respective ownership interests
at the time such grants are approved. Grants did not figure
prominently in the 1984/85 and 1985/86 revenues or in the 1986/87
budget.
Operating Expenses: The bulk of the Districts' operating expenses
are for their share of the joint operating costs, including the costs of
maintaining the Districts' staff and operating the Districts' collection
systems and the joint works.
Operating costs for the joint works account for about 90 percent of
the overall annual operating costs for all of the Districts, with the
operating costs of the District collection systems and miscellaneous `,/
accounting for the balance.
OS57H-5
Capital Expenses: The capital funds provide for the payment of
capital expenditures for joint works and District collection systems.
�./ The capital funds also account for reimbursement agreement revenues
and payments in the case of District No. 5. District No. 5 has
executed a reimbursement agreement with developers to reimburse the
dvelopers for costs they incur for sewer oversizing and construction.
Reimbursements under these agreements will be paid as funds become
available from connection, annexation, service, or other fees as
received and as specified in each agreement. As of June 30, 1985,
District No. 5's unpaid portions of reimbursement agreements totaled
$733,097.
Transfers of Equity and Capacity:
Several revenue and expense categories in the Districts' financial
reports and budgets relate to the transfer of equity or capacity
among Districts and with other agencies.
o Flow-Based Equity Adjustment: From the adoption of the joint
ownership, operating, and construction agreement until the
�./ current year, each District's equity was determined each year
based on a three-year weighted average of assessed valuation and
flow. This formula was developed to reflect both the Districts'
direct demand on the system and their ability to pay in terms of
their respective shares of the combined tax base. Since the
passage of Proposition 13, California's assessed valuations are no
longer proportional to property values. Consequently, the joint
agreement has been amended to base the annual equity
adjustments on flow alone.
The flow-based equity adjustments took effect in 1985/86 and
reflect certain changes in the Districts' proportionate share of the
joint works. District No. 1 was particularly impacted by the
change in allocation formula. District No. 1 includes Santa Ana,
the county seat and the site of state, regional, and federal
government offices. District No. 1 has historically had a low
assessed valuation in proportion to its flow, because of the
amount of government-owned, tax-exempt property within its
OS57H-6
boundaries. With the elimination of assessed valuation from the
allocation formula, District No. 1 owes the other Districts a
balance of more than $6 million in equity. The agreement allows
this amount to be paid over five years with interest at a rate
1 percent less than the earnings rate the Districts receive on
funds invested in the county investment pool. Some Districts
have smaller expenses as a result of this adjustment, and some
Districts receive revenue because their proportionate shares have
been reduced.
❑ District No. 14 Equity Purchase: District No. 14 was formed in
1986 as a result of a negotiated settlement between the Districts
and Irvine Ranch Water District. District No. 14 was formed to
provide an ultimate collection capacity of 32 mgd of treatment and
disposal in the Districts' joint facilities as an alternative to
expanding Irvine Ranch Water District's existing Michelson water
reclamation plant. Under a separate agreement negotiated by the
Districts and IRWD in August 1971, IRWD purchased 15 mgd of
capacity in the Districts' ocean outfall facilities. IRWD's 15 mgd
ownership interest in these facilities was transferred to District u
No. 14 upon its formation.
District No. 14 is purchasing equity from the remaining Districts
in its 1986/87 budgets, at a cost of $17,266,000. The full amount
of District No. 14's equity purchase will be paid in 1986/87.
❑ Sale of Capacity Rights: In 1972 the Districts entered into an
agreement with Chino Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) in
San Bernardino County to provide that district with treatment and
disposal capacity. Under this agrement, CBMWD paid the
Districts $1,625,000 for an initial 5 mgd regulated maximum flow
of wastewater treatment rights in the Districts' treatment and
disposal facilities, with an option to purchase additional
increments, not to exceed 30 mgd total capacity. In 1974 this
agreement was assigned by CBMWD to the Santa Ana Watershed
Project Authority (SAWPA). In 1982, SAWPA negotiated the
OS57H-7
purchase of an additional 3 mgd of wastewater treatment capacity
rights at a cost of $4.2 million, which was recorded at the time as
revenue to the Districts in proportion to their equity in the joint
facilities. SAWPA is expected to purchase an additional 2 mgd in
1986/87 and 5 mgd in 1989/90.
1986/87 Budget
The Districts' budgeting process calls for the adoption of the annual
joint works budget, followed by the adoption of the individual
Districts' budgets. The adoption of the joint budget by the joint
boards establishes the revenues and expenditures for joint works to
be included in the individual Districts' budgets.
Table 15 summarizes the 1986/87 budgets for each of the participating
Districts. The six participating Districts together constitute 89
percent of the total operating budgets and 91 percent of the capital
budgets for the nine Districts.
The operating fund budgets rely on revenues from property taxes
and supplemental user fees, both of which are collected on the
property tax bill. In California, taxes collections are received in two
installments, in December and April, while the Districts operate on a
fiscal year beginning each July 1. The operating fund budgets
include funds to cover the dry period of each tax year, i.e. , the
period from the beginning of the fiscal year until the first taxes are
received. The dry-period requirement is budgeted at one-half of the
annual operating fund budgeted expenditures.
Assessed Valuation
The Orange County Assessor assesses all property within the
Districts except utility property, which is assessed by the State
Board of Equalization.
OS57H-8
Until 1981/82, property in California was assessed at 25 percent of
full cash value. Since 1981/82, property has been assessed at 100
percent of full cash value. Under Proposition 13, the value may be
adjusted annually by not more than 2 percent to account for inflation.
Due to changes in assessment under Article XIIIA, the county
assessment roll no longer purports to be proportional to market value.
(See discussion under the heading "Constitutional Amendments
Affecting Districts' Revenues.")
California law provides exemptions for owner-occupied residences and
business inventories. Prior to 1980/81, 50 percent of the value of
business inventories was exempt from taxes; as of 1980/81 this
exemption increased to 100 percent. $7,000 of the value of
owner-occupied residences is also exempt from property taxation.
Under state law, revenues lost to local governments due to these two
exemptions are reimbursed by the state.
Table 16 shows a history of assessed valuations in the participating
Districts since 1981/82. Over the years shown, the combined
assessed valuation in Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 has increased at
an average rate of 9.97 percent per year. Assessed valuation
information is not available for District No. 14, which does not receive
any property tax revenue.
Tax Levies and Delinquencies
Table 17 shows a five-year history of the Districts' tax levies, tax
collections, and delinquencies. The tax levy apportionment in
Table 17 is each District's annual distribution of general county
taxes, and the related delinquency rate is a countywide rate. Debt
service levies are established and accounted for on a
District-by-District basis, and delinquencies apply to the individual
District's taxpayers only. Districts Nos. 2 and 3 have paid their debt
service in certain recent years by transfer from their capital funds
rather than by the levy of debt service taxes.
OS57H-9
In accordance with the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the
Orange County Tax Collector collects secured tax levies for each
fiscal year. One-half of the taxes is due November 1, and becomes
delinquent December 10; the second installment is due February 1,
and becomes delinquent April 10. A 10 percent penalty is added to
any late installment. On June 30, delinquent properties are sold to
the state.
Property owners may redeem property upon payment of delinquent
taxes and penalties. Properties sold to the state incur a redemption
penalty of 1.5 percent of the taxes due per month.
Properties may be redeemed under an installment plan by paying
current taxes plus 20 percent of delinquent taxes for five years.
Interest accrues at 1.5 percent per month on the unpaid balance.
If no payments have been made on delinquent taxes at the end of five
fiscal years, the property is deeded to the state. Such properties
may thereafter be conveyed to the county tax collector as provided
by law.
Outstanding Bonds
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 have outstanding general obligation
bonds, as shown in Table 8. The bonds were issued in 1951 and
1958, and have final maturities in through . Property
taxes above the I percent general tax levy are levied annually for the
payment of general obligation debt service. In 1984/85, District No. 2
transferred reserves into its debt service funds in an amount
sufficient, together with interest earnings, to pay principal and
interest on its remaining outstanding bonds when due. The District
does not intend to levy additional property taxes for debt service.
Direct and Overlapping Bonded Debt
Table 19 presents the Districts' direct and overlapping bonded debt
at July 30, 1986. Ratios of debt to assessed valuation and debt per
capita are also shown.
OS57H-10
Constitutional Amendments Affecting Districts' Revenues
On June 6, 1978, California voters approved Proposition 13,
a statewide initiative relating to the taxation of real property which
added Article XIIIA to the California Constitution. Among other
things, the Proposition: (a) limits ad valorem property taxes of all
real property to 1 percent of the full cash value of the property;
(b) exempts existing voter-approved bonded indebtedness from the
1 percent limitation; (c) defines "full cash value" as the Assessor's
appraised value of real property as of March 1, 1975, adjusted by
changes in the Consumer Price Index or comparable data--not to
exceed 2 percent per year; (d) permits establishment of a new "full
cash value" when there is new construction or a change in ownership;
(e) permits the reassessment, up to the March 1, 1975 value, of
property which was not current on the 1975/76 assessment roll;
(f) requires counties to collect the 1 percent property tax and to
apportion it to the districts within the counties; (g) prohibits new
ad valorem taxes on real property, or sales taxes, or transaction
taxes, on the sales of real property; (h) permits the imposition of
special taxes by cities, counties and special districts if approved by a
two-thirds vote of the qualified electors of such districts; and
(i) requires a two-thirds vote of all members of both houses of the
legislature for any changes in state taxes which would result in
increased revenues. Various legislative measures have been adopted
by the California legislature since the passage of Proposition 13 to
reduce its impact on local governments.
A special election was held on November 6, 1979, at which time the
voters of the State of California approved the Initiative Constitutional
Amendment--Limitation of Government Appropriations ("Proposition 411)
which added Article XIIIB to the California Constitution. The details
are complex and will require clarification from subsequent legislation
or judicial decisions. The city cannot predict whether the amendment
will, if challenged, be upheld, in whole or in part, by the courts.
Proposition 4 went into effect on July 1, 1980 and .provides that state
and local government appropriations from certain revenue sources
each year may not exceed the appropriations limit related to such N%.O�
revenue sources set for the fiscal year 1978/79, with certain
OS57H-11
adjustments made for changes in the cost of living and population.
Any surplus revenues will be required to be returned to the
taxpayers through downward revision of tax rates and fee schedules
during the subsequent two fiscal years. The measure also contains
provisions relating to emergency situations, revision of the
appropriations limit by a majority vote of the people, reorganizations
of governments, savings by government, nonimpairment of bonds,
allocation of funding of state-mandated programs, and various
exemptions.
The Districts' staff annually calculates the appropriations limits for
those Districts to which such a limit applies. The participating
Districts' 1986/87 appropriations limits are shown below. District
No. 14 has no appropriations limit because the limit applies only to the
appropriations of proceeds of taxes. District No. 14 receives no
proceeds of taxes.
1986/87
District
1986/87 Net Tax
�.s Appropriations Appropriations
District Limit Budget
1 $1,822,590 $ (69,000)
2 7,578,850 2,427,000
3 9,544,745 3,952,000
5 1,962,605 1,363,000
6 1,142,439 275,000
14 not applicable not applicable
OS57A-23
TABLE 1
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Summary of District Statistics
July 1, 1986
District District District District District District District District District
No. 11 No. 21 No. 31 No. 51 No. 61 No. 7 No. 11 No. 13 No. 141
Formation date 1947 1947 1947 1947 1947 1947 1947 1985 1986
Directors 4 12 16 3 3 7 3 5 4
Area (sq.mi. )
Population (1986)
Connections
Supplemental user feesz $26.40 $ -- $ -- $26.40 $29.04
Connection charge $1,000 $200 $250 $250 to $1,000 $250 $1,250 $1 250 to none
$2,000 51,500
Assessed valuation (1985/86)
Ownership in joint works 10.66% 28.48% 30.85% 5.38% 5.49% 5.96% 7.06% 0.04% 6.08%
Anticipated construction
requirement (millions):
Joint works 1986-90 $23.5 $62.9 $ 68.1 $11.8 $12.1 $13.1 $15.5 $0.1 $13.4
Joint works 1991-96, with waiver 5.7 15.3 16.6 2.9 2.9 3.2 3.8 0.02 3.2
Joint works 1991-96, w/o waiver 36.1 96.5 104.5 18.2 18.6 20.2 23.9 0.1 20.6
District collection, 1986-90 0.6 19.6 15.4 12.6 2.3 6.9 11.1 -- 9.3
District collection, 1991-96 0.2 19.3 0.6 0.4 2.1 0.2 7.1 0.7
1 - Participants in this financing.
2 - Annual fee per single-family dwelling.
3 - Connection fee in District No. 5 varies by zone.
OS57A-22
SINGLE-COLUMN-WIDTH TABLE if possible
TABLE 2
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Local Agencies Represented on District Boards
District Cities Special Districts
1 Santa Ana Costa Mesa Sanitary District
Tustin
2 Anaheim Garden Grove Sanitary District
Brea
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
La Habra
Orange
Placentia
Santa Ana
Yorba Linda
3 Anaheim Garden Grove Sanitary District
Brea Midway City Sanitary District
Buena Park
Cypress
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Huntington Beach
La Habra
La Palma
Santa Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton
5 Newport Beach
6 Newport Beach Costa Mesa Sanitary District
7 Irvine Costa Mesa Sanitary District
Newport Beach
Orange
Santa Ana
Tustin
11 Huntington Beach
13 Anaheim
Brea
Orange
Yorba Linda
14 Irvine Irvine Ranch Water District
Tustin
OS57A-4
TABLE 3
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Joint Works Project Expenditures, 1986/87-1992/93 ($000)
1989/90
through 7-Year
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1992/93 Total
Plant 1 Improvements
eaea worFs $ 1,500 $ 7,000 $ 8,000 $ 13,000 $ 29,500
Digesters & gas handling -- -- 500 11,500 12,000
Central power generation 200 2,120 4,000 3,500 9,820
Digester rehabilitation 1,600 250 1,000 1,500 4,350
Additional 24 mgd primary -- 150 500 4,750 5,400
Primary basin rehabilitation 1,700 2,700 -- -- 4,400
69 kV substation 100 500 2,000 500 3,100
Electrical reliability 4,500 100 -- -- 4,600
Other Plant 1 projects 4.80 2 550 1 800 1 650 10 805
Total Plant 1 improvements �405 -3',-37b � -79'4- � -83i375
Plant 2 Im rovements
entra power generation 200 4,300 5,000 6,000 15,500
Odor control facilities 6,050 2,500 -- -- 8,550
Digester rehabilitation 600 1,350 -- 4,000 5,95(69 kV substation 100 1,000 2,000 1,000 4,10
Rehabilitation of primary clarifier 4,010 500 -- -- 4,510
Headworks improvements 2,200 1,200 -- -- 3,400
Belt filter presses 3,500 300 -- -- 3,800
Other Plant 2 improvementsects 0 �1 00,00,00 � 4 3900
Total Plant 2 improvements
Inter leant an�d�Joint
ec amatil�l o 865 1,150 1,000 4,000 7,015
Treatment Plant 2 1,458 1,000 1,000 4,000 7,458
Joint and interplant facilities 318 500 500 2,000 3,318
Equipment requests 1,762 1,500 1,000 4,000 8,262
Solids processing & disposal 55 45 350 39,000 39,500
Special projects 1 120 1 991 2 000 1 175 6 236
Total interplant and joint -t'M -t'Mg -i M 5 :175 71:754
Total joint works construction projects $47,083 $46,006 $44,600 $137,255 $274,944
OS57A-5
TABLE 4
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
District Shares of Capital Costs
1989/90
Cost through 7-Year
District Share 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1992/93 Total
1 10.66% $ 5,019 $ 4,904 $ 4,754 $ 14,632 $ 29,309
2 28.48 13,409 13,103 12,702 39,090 78,304
3 30.85 14,524 14,193 13,759 42,343 84,819
5 5.38 2,533 2,476 2,399 7,385 14,793
6 5.49 2,585 2,526 2,449 7,535 15,095
7 5.96 2,807 2,742 2,658 8,180 16,387
11 7.06 3,324 3,248 3,149 9,690 19,411
13 0.04 19 18 18 56 111
Totals 5UFM sF46', n $�4'W €53/:255 1€274944
OS57A-6
TABLE 5
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Total Capital Costs by District
1986/87 thru 1988/89 1989/90 thru 1992/93
Joint District 3-Year Joint District 7-Year
District Works Collection Total Works Collection Total
1 $ 14,677 $ 400 $ 15,077 $ 14,632 $ 400 $ 30,109
2 39,214 17,290 56,504 39,090 21,700 117,294
3 42,476 8,800 51,276 42,343 7,250 100,869
5 7,408 8,625 16,033 7,385 4,450 27,868
6 7,560 950 8,510 7,535 3,500 19,545
7 8,207 5,435 13,642 8,180 1,728 23,550
11 9,721 3,540 13,261 9,690 14,700 37,651
13 55 -- 55 56 -- 111
Totals €137:683 3A�3db 1Ff85:829 $53 'M T663'13 83'/12
OS57A-24
SINGLE-COLUMN-WIDTH TABLE
TABLE 13
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Participating Districts
Reserves at July 1, 1986
Reserves at July 1, 1986
District Capital Operating Total
1 $ 6,705,000 $ 3,614,000 $ 10,319,000
2 60,977,000 10,179,000 71,156,000
3 55,635,000 5,945,000 61,580,000
5 11,102,000 2,114,000 13,216,000
6 4,063,000 1,949,000 6,012,000
14 S 4�666 ,1$23-946,000 Totals
05578-35
TABLE 14
Participating Districts
Estimated Revenues and Expenses by Fund, 1984/85 aM 1985/86
District No. 1 District No. 2 District No. 3 District No. 5 District No. 6 District
No. 14
1984/85 1985/86 1984/85 1985/66 1984/85 1985/86 1984/85 1985/86 1984/85 1985/86 1985/86
0 eraera lR SIL
Revenues 6 sources:
Reserves 6 carryover $1,506,366 $ 805,103 $ 7,426.402 $ 9,874,393 $ 4,800,980 $ 6,985,189 $1,315.238 $ 1,650,850 $ 929,132 $1.974,235 $ --
Fees 379,123 459,345 2,535,909 2.697.540 1,315,419 1.033,628 21,435 48,115 129,351 156,456 36.000
Supplemental user fees -- 961.441 -- -- - 196,935 104.898 924.702 16,607 140
Interest 6 miscellaneous 166,628 229,375 1,459.414 1,019,714 68,711 750,523 1BO.137 193,668 144.535 199.166 revenu
fuM inp 1 3 1 37 5 5� 7 ? 5 9 9� 7 3 71fi6�; 1 6 1 7�,� 1 3� 2�391 �%2 4* �M
Expenses:
Share of joint operating costs 2,220,376 2,367,204 6,275,839 6,96D,802 6.418.833 7,631,300 1,D74,439 1,216,928 1,145,936 1.173,905 24,D00
Other operating expenses 1-5-344a/M67 Z�x(68 487 76-T56Hv76d 4-6515ob34 6�211ai56 4�,91 B0 4 j �692 bvb5
Total expenses
Difference 982.081 1.373,790 10.232,236 11.996.836 7,204,855 8.163,607 1,7a1,447 2,091,083 2,247,424 1,942,22E 9,359
0a ILaR� (Joint 6 District)
evenues sources:
Reserves 6 carryover 7,354,393 7,038,221 58,691.317 56.663.710 44.942.617 46,549,960 7,117,894 7,686,652 3.246,065 3,024,684 464,075
Equity adjustments 33,320 1,991,248 111,066 8.384,176 1.024,980 7,707,818 24,648 4,256.750 21,697 1,540,942 17,269.357
Fees 138,533 211,792 2,075,230 2,062.112 1.124.224 1.076.161 947,035 833,476 445,235 1,023.837 6,011,820
Total interest
availahle of c funding
.Mo2t9 4 6 8-67x/25v605 5 2 I1055 5 198 y70�5 4 5, 69538 8 ,3 9 2 b
Expenses:
Joint facilities construction 1,271,283 909,624 4,302,869 3,735,365 5.446,654 3.673.523 1.253.442 1.918.611 927,243 799,141 906.000
District facilities -- -- 885.898 6,704.415 341,655 19.700 20.011 30,027 14,173 5,533,367
Other expenses 21,361 -- 32.007 -• 109.332 •- -- 270,312 -- 71,372
Equity adjustment. -- -- 5.995,899 -- -- -- -- -- 133,000 -• 17.266,000
Transfer to bond fund -- -- 1 324 000 -- 496 081 303 000 -- -- -- -• --
Total expenses 7,"15r 47 --99T t4 121510v613 70,479,/ou -6,I97�7T1 -J;19b;1Z7 T.IHr.757 T,1R8.927 T09. D M-RT,7A ZT7. W739
Difference $7.081,605 $8.810.365 $55,184,332 $61,949,323 $45,896.704 $55,644,254 $7,636.726 $11,436.633 $2,984.533 $5,167,965 S 53.921
OS57A-26
TABLE 15
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Participating Districts
1986/87 Budgets
District District District District District District
No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 5 No. 6 No. 14
0 eratin Fund
eEAN an carryover $ 3,560 $11,999 $ 8,164 $ 2,093 $ 1,949 $ 9
Revenues:
Property tax 1,503 6,749 8,520 2,063 1,008 --
Fees 1,402 2,860 1,096 708 172 449
Interest & miscellaneous 242 856 542 180 121 3
Total revenues _FM =4n -1= _FM -1-36I �52
Total available resources 6,707 22,464 18,322 5,044 3,250 461
Expenses:
Share of joint 0&M 3,220 9,604 10,151 1,555 1,631 253
Collection system O&M 223 724 1 057 498 157 130
Total expenses -E-M -IS;32ii -I1',� - T3 -7M -383
Reserves and carryover 3,264 12,136 7,114 2,991 1,462
Dry-period requirement Tt ,tt T5 7�6�4 1 �0�2�7 4� g
Closing fund balance
Cap,italFund
eser carryover $ 6,625 $59,643 $55,635 $11,296 $ 5,159 $ 67
Revenues:
Construction grants 251 670 726 126 129 143
Connection & other fees 421 2,020 1,056 376 1,947 20,872
Interest & miscellaneous 752 4,824 3,633 814 1,186 285
Equity sale to District No. 14 1,095 5,300 3,633 1,000 1,078 --
Flow-based equity adjustment -- -- 5 520 2 398 --
Total revenue -3 M -TA-M -I2'tt
Total available resources 10,482 73,653 67,866 16,236 9,730 21,622
Expenses:
Share of joint works construction 5,019 13,409 14,524 2,533 2,585 2,863
District collection system 200 4,950 1,810 1,675 385 1,270
Reimbursement agreement payments -- -- -- 67 -- --
Flow-based equity adjustment 1,217 1,411 2,492 -- 1,034 --
Other expenses 22 -- 2 175 -- -- 17 266*
Total expenses 58 -17M -2i,tt L75 -rW 9
Reserves and carryover 4,024 3,883 46,865 11,961 5,726 223
*District No. 14 equity purchase.
a.i
OS57A-33
TABLE 16
Assessed Valuations ($000)*
Fiscal District District District District District Total All Percent
Year No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 5 No. 6 Districts Increase
1981/82 $2,970,106 $13,265,787 $13,779,281 $3,306,447 $2,425,049 $35,747,670 -- %
1982/83 2,311,370 15,212,764 15,408,800 3,816,229 2,742,358 40,491,521 13.3
1983/84 3,586,303 16,501,653 16,490,626 4,159,297 2,919,395 43,657,274 7.8
1984/85 3,930,193 18,287,328 17,950,576 5,055,413 3,190,794 48,414,304 10.9
1985/86 4,274,635 19,963,641 19,121,962 5,507,566 3,405,138 52,272,942 8.0
Average
annual
increase 9.53% 10.76% 8.54% 13.61% 8.86% 9.97%
*Before redevelopment adjustments.
Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc.
OS57A-32
SINGLE-COLUMN-WIDTH TABLE if possible
TABLE 17
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Participating Districts
Tax Levies and Delinquencies'
Percent Debt Percent
Tax Levy Delinquentz Service Delinquent
Apportionment June 30 Levy June 30
District 1
1T8D78F-- $ 729,612 3.45% $ 68,859 2.90%
1981/82 841,790 3.90 62,238 3.36
1982/83 933,259 4.41 63,985 4. 50
1984/84 961,822 3.92 60,473 3.53
1984/85 1,021,219 3.54 63,598 3.39
District 2
M78F- 3,180,328 3.45 41,421 3.18
1981/82 3,589,547 3.90 42,274 3.40
1982/83 4,051,255 4.41 n/a n/a
1984/84 4,355,859 3.92 n/a n/a
1984/85 4,693,293 3.54 n/a n/a
District 3
199U/Tf- 4,278,243 3.45 544,292 2.31
1981/82 4,808,409 3.90 499,087 2.40
1982/83 5,311,832 4.41 n/a n/a
1984/84 5,658,461 3.92 n/a n/a
1984/85 6,171,418 3.54 n/a n/a
District 5
1 1 735,317 3.45 n/a n/a
1981/82 860,895 3.90 9,183 4.94
1982/83 1,016,966 4.41 21,564 5.91
1984/84 1,112,270 3.92 33,913 5.58
1984/85 1,383,389 3.54 19,029 4.17
District 6
TW791- 462,350 3.45 24,560 3.60
1981/82 553,332 3.90 24,944 4.78
1982/83 625,055 4.41 25,796 4.83
1984/84 671,980 3.92 17,171 4.23
1984/85 1,158,414 3.54 40,405 3.93
1 - Data not available for District No. 14.
2 - Delinquency percentage reflects countywide rate.
OS57A-25
SINGLE-COLUMN-WIDTH TABLE
v
TABLE 18
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Participating Districts
Outstanding Debt at June 30, 1986
Issue Outstanding Final
District Date Balance Maturity
1 1951 $ 280,000
2 1951 135,000
2 1958 1,000,000
3 1951 174,000
3 1958 1,500,000
5 1951 116,000
6 1951 57 000
Total W262'60u
OS57DD-2
====Tables Al-A5 here
OS57DD-3
Joint operating expenses are accounted for in the joint operating
fund. Expenses incurred by the joint operating fund are allocated
to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow during the year.
The joint working capital revolving fund was established as a
clearing fund for payroll, related benefits, and certain overhead
items. Expenses are allocated to the Districts, capital outlay
revolving fund, and joint operating fund, based primarily on
direct labor hours.
OS57A-7
TABLE Al
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
District No. 1
Statement of Operations and Retained Earnings
1980/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85
0 eratin Revenues
ervice c arges $ 315,298 $ 649,524 $ 495,140 $ 398,573 $ 546,050
Connection fees -- -- -- -- 6,750
Allocation from joint
operating fund 123,714 129,362 96,372 75,720 85,532
Other revenue 2 816 35 5 285 26 028 20 600
Total operating revenue 441;828 --777=1 -5 b,IV/ -500:321 658:432
0 eratin Ex enses
a an es ene i s 73,974 77,041 89,771 70,222 113,193
Contractual services 20,487 18,930 27,940 22,806 53,307
Allocation from joint
operating fund 1,190,706 1,308,796 1,604,695 2,012,931 2,252,771
Other Subtotalpenses �3865247 5 94439 �_8862 ,4 5!807�
Depreciation & amortization 579 625 509 384 560 759 775 134 759 951
Operating income (loss) Z1;4[6 623) (1,139:506) (1,691!�91 ,386!63d) 2,526:1
Nino eratin Revenues
apactty rig is 51,357 394,778 696 82,836 33,320
Property taxes 948,184 1,060,304 1,127,332 1,190,937 1,276,739
Interest 1,122,160 1,308,135 1,102,069 963,444 996,890
Federal & state grants 2,377,648 2,037,609 37,021 35,917 4,995
Net allocation from joint
operating fund 7,606 9,199 5,533 9,101 12,101
Other 99 823T26 73.842
Total nonoperating revenue
Nono eratin Expenses
nterest 17,782 14,796 12,207 10,630 8,895
Other �39985 29 0599 g _ 8 3330 22 682
,5777
Total nonoperating expenses
Net earnings (loss) 3,158,172 3,891,748 561,224 (93,394) (204,576)
Retained earnings, July 1 21,651,215 24,809,387 28,701,135 29,104,296 29,010,902
Adjustments -- -- (158,063) -- --
Retained earnings, June 30 $24,809,387 $28,701,135 $29,104,296 $29,010,902 $28,806,326
Source: Prepared by Bartle Wells Associates from financial statements of the issuer.
OS57A-8
TABLE A2
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
District No. 2
Statement of Operations and Retained Earnings
1980/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85
D�erating Revenues
ervice5 charges $ 595,799 $ 1,529,347 $ 1,791,353 $ 3,063,292 $ 3,466,729
Connection fees 658,626 606,133 650,294 656,851 843,412
Allocation from joint
operating fund 318,038 347,849 262,231 205,093 242,202
Other revenue1P 6
2
Total operating revenue
0 eratin Ex enses
a cries ene i s 163,972 178,301 172,213 181,686 234,718
Contractual services 115,004 194,700 129,908 120,146 142,972
Utilities 52,010 58,864 48,213 50,097 56,935
Allocation from joint
operating fund 3,060,990 3,519,308 4,366,388 5,452,199 6,379,154
Other
Subtotalpenses
Depreciation & amortization 2 364 243 2 390 374 2 566 61 ) 3 192 9336:006) 3 )
�../ Operating income (loss) 3T, 5 ,$f6)�3'-47S,4GI) ts/
Nono eratin Revenues
nnexation ees 760,774 765,795 755,819 808,880 731,058
Capacity rights 164,918 1,257,345 2,266 274,214 111,066
Property taxes 4,157,903 4,576,760 4,665,552 4,882,391 5,188,370
Interest 6,200,360 7,969,800 7,152,834 6,819,210 7,881,691
Federal & state grants 7,635,121 6,489,676 120,379 118,436 13,836
Net allocation from joint
operating fund 19,553 24,737 15,057 24,658 34,267
Other � 19 3J�BBi �
Total nonoperating revenue12,929
Nono eratin Expenses
nterest 65,411 76,223 70,710 51,113 40,704
Other 15 215 14 466 38 690 22 595 31 474
Total nonoperating expenses BU,,625 �3b� �6b - 73:70 /29I78
Net earnings 14,693,173 17,085,351 8,103,140 7,950,888 8,477,371
Retained earnings, July 1 107,099,558 121,792,731 138,878,082 146,476,892 154,427,780
Adjustments -- -- (504,330) -- (5,668,286)*
Retained earnings, June 30 $121,792,731 $138,878,082 $146,476,892 $154,427,780 $157,236,865
*Equity transfer to District No. 13.
Source: Prepared by Bartle Wells Associates from financial statements of the issuer.
OS57A-9
TABLE A3
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
District No. 3
Statement of Operations and Retained Earnings
1980/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85
Operating Revenues
Service charges $ 273,401 $ 862,071 $ 1,178,388 $ 1,042,580 $ 1,996,943
Connection fees 656,440 416,591 432,702 670,207 607,200
Allocation from joint
operating fund 353,524 356,503 262,950 204,633 246,874
Other revenue 3 "1 4 470 4 250 23 483 17 225
Total operating revenue 1�28 ,c116b 1,639:635 1,878:40 �1, 4�0:903 2,868:242
0�etisEz ensess eaari & s 133,623 191,850 224,003 212,957 196,100
Contractual services 172,055 61,237 83,554 137,666 96,278
Utilities 87,287 100,370 109,948 121,704 119,356
Allocation from joint
operating fund 3,402,523 3,606,864 4,378,363 5,439,978 6,502,179
Other expenses 55 731 38 408 53 438 44 641 57 305
Subtotal , �lj,'t16 3,9989729 4,849:306 946 6,971:91
Depreciation & amortization 2 563 733 2 505 317 2 768 860 3 230 604 3 489
Operating income (loss) ,1 , 8 ) 4,864, 11) 5, 3 , 7 ) ,246, )--&
Nono eratin Revenues
nnexati0n fees -- 500 -- -- --
Capacity rights 176,097 1,344,791 2,388 286,942 114,240
Property taxes 5,692,321 6,200,377 6,058,209 6,359,909 6,776,782
Interest 4,820,223 6,127,849 5,580,493 5,252,734 5,928,775
Federal & state grants 8,152,669 6,941,018 126,832 124,420 17,134
Net allocation from joint
operating fund 21,735 25,352 15,098 24,602 34,928
Other 120,387 48 783 2 744 23 684 65 445
Total nonoperating revenue 18,983,432 20 68 ,670 11,785:764 12,072 2911 12�937:304
Nono eratin Expenses
nterest 96,830 111,647 91,797 71,948 52,015
Other 14 980 12 497 40 910 29 923 21 717
Total nonoperating expenses 111,8NU LA1 i144 �1 27, 07 101:871 ,732
Net earnings (loss) 13,743,837 15,700,115 5,913,181 4,723,773 5,271,225
Retained earnings, July 1 105,353,073 119,096,910 134,797,025 140,183,127 144,906,900
Adjustments -- -- (507,079) -- --
Retained earnings, June 30 $119,096,910 $134,797,025 $140,183,127 $144,906,900 $150,178,125
Source: Prepared by Bartle Wells Associates from financial statements of the issuer.
OS57A-10
TABLE A4
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
District No. 5
Statement of Operations and Retained Earnings
1980/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85
0 eratin Revenues
erv�ce c arges $ -- $ 519,148 $ 660,762 $ 679,987 $ 643,284
Connection fees 245,154 291,608 14,447 111,871 425,055
Allocation from joint
operating fund 64,787 66,535 48,790 38,090 42,038
Other revenue 9 217 5 090 250 4 025 1 950
Total operating revenue 319:I59 - 8823811 --722F4zj 973 - ,111�327
0 eratin Ex enses
Sp
aries ene its 105,225 122,587 117,990 123,099 199,820
Contractual services 35,595 22,542 20,405 17,866 41,685
Utilities 82,100 68,189 58,942 58,469 57,499
Allocation from joint
operating fund 623,556 673,160 812,405 1,012,576 1,107,226
Other Subtotalpenses ,2 � 1306 119 828 � '1�a02255 ,516 84424
Depreciation & amortization 428 143 419 869 535 299 691 921 784 365
.../ Operating income (loss) �97 387) (543:794) (8909254) -(1,1/4:973) (1,389,`882)
Nono eratin Revenues
nnexation ees -- -- 7,989 -- 150
Capacity rights 37,853 286,532 507 60,958 24,649
Property taxes 881,905 1,024,235 1,140,287 1,285,589 1,525,560
Interest 1,016,925 1,206,119 1,007,866 929,779 1,034,713
Federal & state grants 1,752,491 1,478,910 26,939 26,432 3,694
Net allocation from joint
operating fund 3,983 4,732 2,802 4,579 5,948
Other 17 448 19.77 2.38 2 831 1 101
Total nonoperating revenue 3,710;605 4,020,298 2,188,,776 2,336`16$ �5,8I5
Nono eratin Expenses
nterest 6,075 28,870 22,676 21,274 5,113
OtherTotal 09 98:9788 40!26 ,'053
Total nonoperating expenses
Net earnings (loss) 2,498,520 3,377,526 1,258,254 1,090,142 1,382,256
Retained earnings, July 1 17,653,568 20,152,088 23,529,614 24,678,186 25,768,328
Adjustments -- -- (109,682) -- --
Retained earnings, June 30 $20,152,088 $23,529,614 $24,678,186 $25,768,328 $27,150,584
Source: Prepared by Bartle Wells Associates from financial statements of the issuer.
a.i
OS57A-11
TABLE AS
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
District No. 6
Statement of Operations and Retained Earnings
1980/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85
0 eratin Revenues
ervice $ 61,436 $ 39,841 $ 114,292 $ 881,520 $ 1,063,315
Connection fees 79,438 40,597 46,853 119,603 329,264
Allocation from joint
operating fund 66,078 71,930 52,849 41,702 43,877
Other revenue 440 500 685 3.42 2 750
Total operating revenue [0T332 ---I= �75 TU4b,Z47 1,439206
01,erating Exenses
a ariebT' & eene�s 9,535 19,085 18,912 17,655 16,460
Contractual services 8,079 10,618 9,840 15,488 27,429
Utilities 183 215 238 241 493
Allocation from joint
operating fund 635,978 727,741 879,979 1,108,596 1,155,629
Other expenses 34 175 36 307 31 533 27 154 27 656
Subtotal 68/:950 /93:866 44U:562 1,169!134 1,2279-667
Depreciation & amortization 292 301 311 225 350 015 485 485 424
Operating income (loss) (7728 3) -(952:323) (1,076;638) (6683/2)
Nono eratin Revenues
apace y ,Ights 32,652 247,903 442 53,360 21,697
Property taxes 577,062 679,944 737,313 773,623 1,277,129
Interest 524,728 593,255 498,254 439,416 531,414
Federal & state grants 1,511,652 1,297,692 5,311 23,138 3,251
Net allocation from joint
operating fund 4,063 5,115 3,034 5,014 6,208
Other �19 83737 6
Total nonoperating revenue
Nono eratin Expenses
n Brest 4,997 5,333 4,520 4,340 6,214
Other � 4 4 9511 73 8i9 �2 3�
Total nonoperating expenses
Net earnings (loss) 1,891,006 1,879,233 172,678 660,240 1,631,018
Retained earnings, July 1 10,822,882 12,713,888 14,593,121 14,668,009 15,328,249
Adjustments -- -- (97,790) -- --
Retained earnings, June 30 $12,713,888 $14,593,121 $14,668,009 $15,328,249 $16,959,267
Source: Prepared by Bartle Wells Associates from financial statements of the issuer.
OS57DD-4
====Insert Tables A6-A15
a
OS57A-12
TABLE ( )
County station Districts of Orange County
District No. 1
Balance Sheet, June 30
1983 1984 1985
Assets
urrent assets:
Cash & investments $ 900,516 $ 1,506,356 $ 805,103
Receivables 30,357 49,377 31,039
Deposits in:
- Joint working capital & operating funds 425,515 468,292 558,837
Self-insurance funds 1;�3137 110'9889 5 2�
Total current assets
Restricted assets:
Cash & investments 8,215,856 7,434,558 7,388,895
Receivables 599 730 362 767 425 720
Total restricted assets 81 ,586 77 325 7,814615
Plant, property & equipment 23,813,656 24,229,789 25,203,127
Less accumulated depreciation (5,399,917) (6,146,317) (6,872,839)
Construction in progress 1 372 765 1 521 805 1 541 056
Net plant, property & equipment 19;786:504 19;305277 19,871�34F
Other assets 16,434 81,710 84,84%./
Total assets 30,080,249 29,619,301 29,286,029
Liabilities Deferred Revenue Contributions,
�and etai�ned a_rmnq_s
urrent— payable from current assets 107,738 78,913 48,100
Current liabilities payable from restricted assets 448 213 1 199:10033
Total current liabilities ,
GO bonds payable, excluding current portion 420,000 350,000 280,000
Retained earnings 29,104,296 29,010,902 28,806,326
Total liabilities, deferred revenue,
contributions & retained earnings $30,080,249 $29,619,301 $29,286,029
OS57A-13
TABLE ( )
County sanitation Districts of Orange County
District No. 2
Balance Sheet, June 30
1983 1984 1985
Assets
N—rrent assets:
Cash & investments $ 9,114,177 $ 7,426,402 $ 9,874,392
Receivables 243,876 219,879 254,523
Deposits in:
- Joint working capital & operating funds 1,063,128 1,281,256 979,306
- Self-insurance funds10'297�11151126
Total current assets
Restricted assets:
Cash & investments 51,224,385 58,961,569 57,994,888
Receivables 2 486 045 2 469 044 1 708 359
Total restricted assets -55 7iD'Uu 611,430!Gf3 -59:703:247
Plant, property & equipment 104,490,776 106,291,417 110,583,059
Less accumulated depreciation (22,460,550) (25,558,357) (28,690,027)
Construction in progress 4 649 146 5 116 725 6 396 071
Net plant, property & equipment -86'679 Z 86:549:785 —8B:289slO3
�./ Other assets 54,405 272,368 262,203
Total assets 151,163,338 157,494,140 159,702,901
Liabilities Deferred Revenue Contributions,
and etain�e ar% s
urrentC liabilities payable Trom current assets 499,347 479,844 401,418
Current liabilities payable from restricted assets 1�837'�4g723a 856
Total current liabilities ,
GO bonds payable, excluding current portion 1,825,000 1,480,000 1,135,000
Reimbursement agreements -- 47,660 --
Deferred annexation & other revenue 524,626 -- 47,660
Retained earnings 146,476,892 154,427,780 157,236,865
Total liabilities, deferred revenue,
contributions & retained earnings $151,163,338 $157,494,140 $159,702,901
OS57A-14
TABLE ( )
County station Districts of Orange County
District No. 3
Balance Sheet, June 30
1983 1984 1985
Assets
urrent assets:
Cash & investments $ 5,706,724 $ 4,800,980 $ 6,985,188
Receivables 155,525 153,817 192,525
Deposits in:
- Joint working capital & operating funds 1,155,192 1,166,203 1,075,906
- Self-insurance funds �294+1,
Total current assets
Restricted assets:
Cash & investments 41,645,541 45,348,850 46,922,264
Receivables 1364 7:9117:2356 1 286:485
Total restricted assets
Plant, property & equipment 115,686,873 117,233,030 122,096,555
Less accumulated depreciation (25,133,078) (28,264,142) (31,646,685)
Construction in progress 4 730 847 5 590 965 6 444 222
Net plant, property & equipment 4 02 �94:5591853
Other assets 56,929 280,150 262,56
Total assets 145,924,022 149,188,021 154,032,518
Liabilities Deferred Revenue Contributions,
an�� et��aine ar��mn s
urrentCiabMrt%s payable from current assets 1,128,631 1,143,719 1,213,293
Current liabilities payable from restricted assets l t 86826g4,
Total current liabilities ,
GO bonds payable, excluding current portion 2,744,000 2,209,000 1,674,000
Retained earnings 140,183,127 144,906,900 150,178,125
Total liabilities, deferred revenue,
contributions & retained earnings $145,924,022 $149,188,021 $154,032,518
0557A-15
TABLE ( )
County 3 nitation Districts of Orange County
District No. 5
Balance Sheet, June 30
1983 1984 1985
Assets
urrent assets:
Cash & investments $ 1,473,962 $ 1,315,238 $ 1,650,850
Receivables 46,963 56,558 52,156
Deposits in:
- Joint working capital & operating funds 215,640 217,684 200,331
Self-insurance funds 58
Total current assets
Restricted assets:
Cash & investments 6,990,616 7,141,391 7,775,003
Receivables 222 358 350 523 199 184
Total restricted assets T,491:914 — 7,974!187
Plant, property & equipment 20,202,669 21,603,723 22,881,961
Less accumulated depreciation (4,311,543) (4,968,316) (5,716,114)
Construction in progress 1 288 48361 1 113 467 1 229 772
Net plant, property & equipment —17 3797 —17,756,8T4 —18:395:619
a./ Other assets 50,362 90,343 91,016
Total assets 26,231,353 26,985,377 28,423,480
Liabilities Deferred Revenue Contributions,
and et-ained Earnings
Current liabilities payable from current assets 203,623 184,372 71,662
Current liabilities payable from restricted assets 4�33 17711 144334495
Total current liabilities
GO bonds payable, excluding current portion 156,000 136,000 116,000
Reimbursement agreements 760,373 753,182 733,097
Retained earnings 24,678,186 25,768,328 27,150,584
Total liabilities, deferred revenue,
contributions & retained earnings $26,231,353 $26,985,377 $28,423,480
OS57A-16
TABLE ( )
County station Districts of Orange County
District No. 6
Balance Sheet, June 30
1983 1984 1985
Assets
N_rrent assets:
Cash & investments $ 406,779 $ 929,132 $ 1,974,235
Receivables 15,850 30,992 54,609
Deposits in:
- Joint working capital & operating funds 235,681 258,068 319,298
- Self-insurance funds 55 b88�33 � 76:/398 � 452
Total current assets
Restricted assets:
Cash & investments 3,469,824 3,274,184 3,115,889
Receivables 108 825
107 57.71 479 0207
96
Total restricted assets
Plant, property & equipment 12,802,489 13,246,243 13,840,323
Less accumulated depreciation (2,842,288) (3,308,567) (3,704,897)
Construction in progress 951 551 1 048 054 1 023 781
Net plant, property & equipment —10'5 19751 10:985:730 11;159!20'
Other assets 10,587 53,703 76,421
Total assets 15,214,881 15,697,933 17,126,318
Liabilities Deferred Revenue Contributions,
an eta-nea Earnings
Current -a - -ties payable from current assets 124,247 137,213 36,837
Current liabilities payable from restricted assets 7' 1�45,7173
Total current liabilities
GO bonds payable, excluding current portion 112,000 87,000 52,000
Retained earnings 14,668,009 15,328,249 16,959,267
Total liabilities, deferred revenue,
contributions & retained earnings $15,214,881 $15,697,933 $17,126,318
OS57A-17
TABLE ( )
County station Districts of Orange County
District No. 1
Statement of Changes in Financial Position
1980/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85
Funds Provided
et earnings $ 3,158,172 $ 3,891,748 $ 561,224 $ (93,394) $ (204,576)
Add items not requiring cash:
Decrease in deferred annexation
and other revenue -- (174,108) -- -- --
Depreciation & amortization 9 6 9 9883 55j5�7 755 951
Total funds provided by operation 737 7 4,227024
121
Sale of joint works equity -- 246,803 279,734 44,509 236,027
Decrease in restricted assets -- -- -- 1,018,261 --
Increase in current liability and
reimbursement agreements 104,503 -- 105,965 --Net retirement of fixed assets 851 -- -- -- --
Decrease in working capital -- -- 191 940 -- 588 950
Total funds provided IrI 1,699:622 -I;7W,_51-6
Funds Used
tttons to plant, property, and
equipment 2,394,406 2,822,598 986,066 703,693 1,265,180
�./ Purchase of works equity 36,255 -- -- -- --
Current general obligation bonds 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000
Refund of grant revenue -- -- 89,395 -- --
Decrease in current liabilities -- 411,210 -- 268,729 28,663
Increase in restricted assets 1,068,429 917,512 554,161* -- 16,509
Net increase in working capital 274,06 252 507 -- 702 088 --
Total funds used 3,8433,,151 4,473:827 1,6T9,62� 1 744:510 -1-,M6,352
Increase (Decrease) in
om onents o�orrkin Capital
Lash & investments 65,309 169,034 (22,499) 605,850 (701,264)
Receivables 26,669 77,895 (146,337) 19,019 (18,338)
Deposits in joint operating and
working capital funds 87,414 41,291 21,719 (36,136) 169,457
Deposit in self-insurance funds 33,365 3,337 (29,309) 5,617 9,295
Due to joint operating and
working capital funds 61,304 (39,053) (15,514) 107,738 (48,100)
Increase (decrease) in working
capital $ 274,061 $ 252,507 $ (191,940) $ 702,088 $ (588,950)
*Includes establishment of self-insurance reserve for unpaid claims and accrual for compensated
absences.
OS57A-18
TABLE ( )
County station Districts of Orange County
District No. 2
Statement of Changes in Financial Position
1980/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85
Funds Provided
Wet eaA rnings $14,693,173 $17,085,351 $ 8,103,140 $ 7,950,888 $ 8,477,371
Add items not requiring cash:
Decrease in deferred annexation
and other revenue (197,943) (704,444) (425,421) (476,966) --
Depreciation & amortization 2 364 59: 473 88 2 3 3 263:863 666:8 55 4 2 3 i 2 566
195
Total funds provided by operation 84,
Sale of joint works equity 326,294 -- -- -- --
Decrease in restricted assets -- -- -- -- 1,727,366
Increase in current liability and
reimbursement agreements 499,374 -- 150,756 --Net retirement of fixed assets 2,733 -- -- -- --
Decrease in working capital -- -- -- 1 458 254 --
Total funds provided —I ,bbl,,6T4 —I9,7= —f64= J25:109 —17WI 32
Funds Used
Ito plant, property, and
equipment 8,791,802 8,807,879 3,330,835 2,969,745 4,973,'Se!
Purchase of works equity -- 481,618 236,698 311,564 --
Current general obligation bonds 345,000 345,000 345,000 345,000 345,000
Refunding of grant revenue -- -- 290,680 -- --
Decrease in current liabilities -- 559,810 -- -- 176,897
Increase in restricted assets 6,904,598 6,196,591 4,257,941* 7,720,183 --
Equity transferred out -- -- -- -- 5,668,286
Net
Total nfundse used
working capital 1 681:81 46 2 3 1 414:619953 465 2 2
11:Increase (Decrease in
a�om 0nents o orking Capital
investments 1,133,629 2,280,083 2,348,700 (1,687,775) 2,477,990
Receivables 77,009 265,992 (365,074) (23,997) 34,644
Deposits in joint operating and
working capital funds 152,935 (18,863) 226,973 (234,950) 151,128
Deposit in self-insurance funds 94,380 9,440 (82,901) 15,887 26,290
Due to joint operating and
working capital funds 182,613 (140,269) (174,494) 472,867 (374,977)
Deposits & interest payable 5,908 (16,000) 261 (286) 326
Increase (decrease) in working
capital $ 1,646,474 $ 2,380,383 $ 1,953,465 $(1,458,254)$ 2,285,401
*Includes establishment of self-insurance reserve for unpaid claims and accrual for compensated
absences.
0557A-19
TABLE ( )
County station Districts of Orange County
District No. 3
Statement of Changes in Financial Position
1980/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85
Funds Provided
Net earnings $13,743,837 $15,700,115 $ 5,913,181 $4,723,773 $5,271,225
Add items not requiring cash:
Depreciation & amortization 2 563 733 2 505 317 2 768 860 3 230 604 3 489 371
Total funds provided by operation 16:307:570 1�8:205�3,4 8:682:04 7:954:377 8:760:596
Sale of joint works equity 253,784 462,238 215,180 867,929 141,617
Increase in current liability and
reimbursement agreements -- -- 389,314 -- 38,698
Net retirement of fixed assets 2,919 -- -- -- --
Decrease in working capital -- -- 5 924 537 895 847
Total funds provided —I6_� -$,667,M I5,-211:072 —9,118:153 —8,456,41I
Funds Used
ddi�Pions to plant, property, and
equipment 10,243,038 9,406,946 3,375,805 3,596,964 5,947,663
Current general obligation bonds 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000
Refund of grant revenue -- -- 306,261 -- --
Decrease in current liabilities 649,727 1,077,000 -- 939,863 --
Increase in restricted assets 2,433,284 3,554,568 10,994,006* 4,456,326 369,250
Net increase in working capital 2 703 224 4 094 156 -- -- 2 088 998
Total funds used 16:564:273 18:367:610 15311 672 —4-718,1n 8`440 911
Increase (Decrease) in
Components of Wo-rkinq Capital
ash & investments 2,957,611 3,660,122 (5,279,401) (905,744) 2,184,209
Receivables 53,276 245,366 (436,926) (1,708) 38,908
Deposits in joint operating and
working capital funds (161,255) 339,336 231,047 (1,086,537) 1,007,251
Deposit in self-insurance funds 93,160 9,318 (81,829) 15,681 25,950
Due to joint operating and
working capital funds (241,360) (159,986) (352,428) 1,081,811 (1,168,038)
Deposits & interest payable 1,792 -- (5,000) 650 918
Increase (decrease) in working
capital $ 2,703,224 $ 4,094,156 $(5,924,537)$ (895,847)$2,088,998
*Includes establishment of self-insurance reserve for unpaid claims and accrual for compensated
absences.
OS57A-20
\.
TABLE ( )
County station Districts of Orange County
District No. 5
Statement of Changes in Financial Position
1980/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85
Funds Provided
9-et earnings $2,498,520 $3,377,526 $1,258,254 $1,090,142 $1,382,256
Add items not requiring cash:
TottalrfundsiprovidedrbyZation operation ,4 ,4-3-7$7,393 ,/93:bbb3 ,691 921�7�063 ,166:6221
Sale of joint works equity 163,147 137,813 43,036 -- --
Increase in current liability and
reimbursement agreements 75,000 -- (255,717) -- 208,642
Net retirement of fixed assets 628 1,900,001 -- -- --
Decrease in working capital -- -- -- 125 034 --
Total funds provided -3,IS5 M 3,-H= 75S6,ATf -17n/',O97 -7775''fii3
Funds Used
AZT-tions to plant, property, and
equipment 2,739,288 4,631,729 1,020,766 1,266,780 1,162,153
Purchase of works equity -- -- -- 44,509 259,630
Current general obligation bonds 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Refund of grant revenue -- -- 65,050 -- -
Decrease in current liabilities 182,063 223,315 -- 296,8681 -.�.
Increase in restricted assets 245,614 388,434 211,3302 278,940 482,273
Net increase in working capital (21,527) 5-5-83b:209 b80187� � 3755,122
263
Total funds used
Increase (Decrease) in
Com o%nt� o'�Tcr in Capital
Cash & investments 13,707 442,621 352,293 (158,724) 335,611
Receivables (5,038) 28,702 (18,054) 9,625 (4,432)
Deposits in joint operating apd
working capital funds (31,692) 63,580 39,973 (120,065) 104,756
Deposit in self-insurance funds 16,461 1,646 (14,459) 2,771 4,586
Due to joint operating and
working capital funds (14,962) 35,168 (96,027) 141,356 (9,272)
Deposits & interest payable (3) 14 -- 3 127)
Increase (decrease) in working
capital $ (21,527) $ 571,731 $ 263,726 $ (125,034) $ 431,122
1 - Includes $7,191 repayment of reimbursement agreements.
2 - Includes establishment of self-insurance reserve for unpaid claims and accrual for
compensated absences.
OS57A-21
TABLE ( )
County station Districts of Orange County
District No. 6
Statement of Changes in Financial Position
1980/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85
Funds Provided
Wet-earnings $1,891,066 $1,879,233 $ 172,678 $ 660,240 $1,631,018
Add items not requiring cash:
DepTotal fundsprovided amortization
operration ,2L 183,,307 190:45 522:6993350 015 485,,485, ,0
Sale of joint works equity 108,765 37,298 -- -- 283,233
Increase in current liability and
reimbursement agreements 148,029 -- 115,100 -- --
Decrease in restricted assets -- -- -- 196,888 Net retirement of fixed assets 541 -- -- -- --
Decrease in working capital -- -- 77 590 -- --
Total funds provided 'T�44b;342 7,2'£1753 383 _1_,J , 13 -2 3=
Funds Used
itions to plant, property, and
equipment 1,803,245 1,755,104 680,500 491,306 903,902
Purchase of works equity -- -- 21,518 111,273 --
Current general obligation bonds 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000
�./ Refund of grant revenue -- -- 56,676 -- --
Decrease in current liabilities -- 233,441 -- 165,154 72,258
Increase in restricted assets 569,053 161,991 (68,311)* -- 97,335
Net increase in working capital 43 344 52 220 -- 549 880 1 235 229
Total funds used 2,440,€42 �2,22/!756 1,3421613 2:338:724
Increase (Decrease) in
omeeonents o or ing Capital
cash & investments (29,675) 59,635 (31,616) 522,353 1,045,103
Receivables 8,668 (17,623) (10,943) 15,142 23,617
Deposits in joint operating and
working capital funds (3,060) 35,156 47,802 (112,826) 196,443
Deposit in self-insurance funds 17,607 1,761 (15,466) 2,964 4,904
Due to joint operating and
working capital funds 49,804 (26,709) (67,333) 124,213 (34,838)
Deposits & interest payable -- -- 34) (1,966) --
Increase (decrease) in working
capital $ 43,344 $ 52,220 $ (77,590) $ 549,880 $1,235,229
*Includes establishment of self-insurance reserve for unpaid claims and accrual for compensated
absences.
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SELL
$175,090,000 CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
REPRESENTING A DIRECT AND PROPORTIONATE
INTEREST IN PAYMENTS TO BE MADE BY
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DUE UNDER AND PURSUANT TO AN
AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION AND
CONSTRUCTION OF JOINT FACILITIES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed proposals for the pur-
chase of One Hundred Seventy-Five Million Dollars ($175,000,000) (or
such lesser amount as shall be determined as set forth in the Notice
Inviting Bids, hereinafter referred to) aggregate principal amount of
Certificates of Participation representing a direct and proportionate
interest in payments to be made by County Sanitation Districts No. 1,
2 , 3 , 5 , 6 and 14 of Orange County, California (hereinafter referred
to as the "Districts") due under and pursuant to an Agreement for
Acquisition and Construction of Joint Facilities will be received by
the Districts at the offices of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander
s Ferdon, Suite 2020, 333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California
90071 at 11: 00 a.m. (P. D. T. ) on Wednesday,
JULY 30, 1986
INFORMATION AVAILABLE: Request for copies of the Notice
Inviting Bids and the Preliminary Official Statement, or for other
information concerning the Districts, should be addressed to the
Financial Advisor to the Districts : Bartle Wells Associates, 1636
Bush Street, San Francisco, California 94109. Attention: Lora
J. Stovall. Telephone ( 415) 775-3313.
NOTICE INVITING BIDS #11
.r
1140,000,000 CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION #13
REPRESENTING A DIRECT AND PROPORTIONATE #14
.INTEREST IN PAYMENTS TO BE MADE BY #15
-COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #17
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Ila
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #19
.'COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #20
.COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #21
and #23
.COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #25
pue under and Pursuant to an #28
Agreement for the Acquisition and #29
Construction of Joint Facilities #30
$ALE DATE: WEDNESDAY, JULY 30 , 1986 #31
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed proposals Will be #34,3°
received by County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County 1 (35)
( "District No. 10) , County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County #36
( "District No. 2") , County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County #37
("District No. 3") , County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County #38
( "District No. 5") , County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County #39
("District No. 6) and County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange #40
�../ County ( "District No. 140 ) created under the County Sanitation #(40)
Districts Act of the Health and Safety Code of the State of #41
California (collectively, the "Districts") , at the offices of Mudge #42
Rose Guthrie Alexander 8 Ferdon, Suite 2020, 333 South Grand Avenue, #43
Los Angeles, California 90071 at 11:00 a.m. , Los Angeles time, on # (43)
Wednesday, July 30, 1986, for the purchase of $175,000,000 aggregate #44
Rrincipal amount of Certificates of Participation (the "Certificates #45
of Participation") representing a direct and proportionate interest #46
in payments to be made lay County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, #47
5, 6 and 14 of Orange County, California (the "Districts") due under #48
and pursuant to an Agreement for the Acquisition and Construction of #49
Joint Facilities, dated as of August 1, 1986, by and among each of #50
the Districts (the 'Acquisition and Construction Agreement") . #51
The Certificates of Participation are being executed and #52
delivered pursuant to a Trust Agreement by and among , the #53
Trustee and the Districts, dated as of August 1, 1986 Sthe "Trust #54,5"_
Agreement") . The Certificates of Participation are more particularly #56
described in the Trust Agreement, the form of which is incorporated #57
herein by reference. #58
The Districts will enter into the Acquisition and #59 ,6[
Construction Agreement in which each District will agree to acquire #61
certain works and facilities for the handling, treatment and disposal #62
of sewage and industrial Waste from each such District and to pay to #63
2.4948.1.2918.01:1 #10
the other Districts installment payments for the costs of such #
acquisition. Each District will assign, pursuant to the Trust #
Agreement, to the Trustee its rights to receive payments under the #66
the Acquisition and Construction Agreement from the other Districts, #67
And such assignment will provide a source of payment and security for #68
the Certificates of Participation. Bidders are referred to the Trust #69,7C
Agreement and to the hereinafter mentioned Preliminary Official #(70)
Statement for further particulars. The obligation of each District #71,72
to make installment payments under the Agreement for Acquisition and #73
Construction does not constitute an obligation of such pistrict for #74
which the District is obligated to levy any form of taxation or for #75
which the District has levied or pledged any form of taxation. #(75)
OPENING OF BIDS: The bids will be received at the above #77
time and place, will be opened ¢y the Financial Advisor to the #78
Districts (described below) and will be presented to the Disricts at # (78)
their Meeting to be held later that day. #79
ISSUE. $175 ,000 ,000 in aggregate principal amount of #81
Certificates of Participation Bach in the denomination of S_ or #82
an integral multiple thereof, all dated &ugust 1, 1986, and compris- #83
ing all of the Certificates of Participation. # (83)
MATURITIES: The Certificates of Participation will mature #85
on in each of the years, and in the amounts, shown below: #86
year of Principal Year of Principal #�
Maturity Amount Maturity Amount #91 ,92
198_ $ 199_ $ #95
198_ 199 #96
198_ 199 #97
198_ 199 #98
199_ 199 #99
199_ 200 #100
199_ 200 #101
199_ 200 #102
199_ 200 #103
REDEMPTION: The Certificates are subject to mandatory #106
redemption in whole or in part from time to time (but not in a total #107
redemption amount of less than $20 ,000 at any One time) , in inverse #108
order of maturity and by lot within a maturity, on any Eayment Date, #109
without premium, at the principal amount, together with accrued # (109)
.interest to the date fixed for redemption from the Net Proceeds of #110
insurance or condemnation or the proceeds of sale of the Project #111
-2- #9
94948.1.2918 .01:1 #
deposited with the Trustee in the Installment Payment Account #112
`✓ pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement for Acquisition and #113
Construction. # (113.
1. In addition to redemption pursuant to subsection (a) #115
hereof, the Certificates maturing on and after 1, _, #116
are subject to redemption in whole or in part from time to time (but #117
not in a total redemption amount of less than $20 ,000 At any one #118
time) in inverse order of maturity and by lot within a maturity on #119
any Payment Date on or after 1, _, at the principal # (119:
amount with Lespect thereto, together with the premium set forth #120
below (expressed as a percentage of the total amount redeemed) , and #121
accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption from the proceeds #122
of optional prepayments of Installment Payments made by a District #123
pursuant to the Agreement for Acquisition and Construction: # (123:
DATE OF REDEMPTION PREMIUM #126
I. Redemption by lot shall be in such manner as the #129
Trustee shall determine; provided, however, that the portion of any #130
Certificate to be redeemed shall be in the principal amount of $5,000 #131
or any multiple thereof, and that in selecting portions of #132
Certificates for redemption, the Trustee shall treat each such # (132)
.Certificate as representing that number of Certificates which is #133
obtained by dividing the principal amount with respect to such #134
Certificate by $5,000. # (134)
INTEREST: The Certificates of Participation will bear #136
interest from , 198_ at a rate to be fixed 2pon the sale #137
thereof, but not to exceed ten percent (10%) per annum, payable com- #138
mencing on , 198_ and semiannually thereafter on # (138)
and in each year. #139
PAYMENTS: The Certificates of Participation and any premi- #141
ums upon the redemption thereof prior to maturity are payable in #142
lawful money of the United States 2f America At the principal office #143,-
of the Trustee in , California, or, at the option 2f the #145,=
owner, at the office of the Paying Agent of the Districts in #(146:
Interest on the Certificates of #147
Participation is payable in such funds by check or draft mailed to # (147)
the registered owners thereof. 4148
TRANSFER AND EXCHANGE OF BONDS: The Certificates of #150
Participation shall be issued in fully registered form, Bach #151
Certificate of Participation issued pursuant to the Trust Agreement #152
shall be of a denomination which is SS_) or an #153
integral multiple thereof. Transfer of ownership of a Certificate of #154
-3- #9
94948.1.2918 .01:1 #(9)
Participation or Certificates of Participations shall be made by #
exchanging the same for a new Certificate of Participation or #156
Certificates of Participation as provided in the Trust Agreement. No #157
such exchange shall be made between the ( ) day pre- # (157
ceding any interest payment date and such interest payment date. #158
PURPOSE OF ISSUE: The Certificates of Participation are to 9160
be issued to finance the ownership interest of each District in the # (160 .
costs of acquisition of improvements to facilities for the handling, #161,:
treatment and disposition of sewage and industrial wastes. # (162.
TERMS OF SALE #163
INTEREST RATS: The interest rate bid may not exceed ten #165
percent (10%) per annum. The Certificates of Participation will bear #166
interest from , 198_, payable commencing , # (166.
198_, and semiannually thereafter on and in #167
each year. Bidders may specify any number of separate interest #168
rates, and any rate may be repeated as often as desired; provided, #169
however, that (i) each interest rate specified must be in a multiple #170 ,:
of of one percent (_ of 8) and a zero rate of inter- # (171)
est cannot be specified; (ii) no Certificate of Participation shall #172
bear more than one rate of interest; (iii) each Certificate of #173
Participation shall bear interest from its date to its stated matu- 4174
rity date at the interest rate specified in the bid; (iv) all V1 74)
Certificates of Participation of the same maturity date shall bear #
the same interest rate; (v) the interest rate on any maturity in the 0 5)
period 19=20_ shall not be lower than the interest rate on any #176
prior maturity Within such period; and (vi) any premium must be paid #177,1
as part of the purchase price, and no bid will be accepted which pro- 4179
vides for the Waiver of interest or other concession by the bidder as #180
a substitute for payment in full of the purchase price in bank #181
funds. Bids which do not conform to the terms of this paragraph will #182
be rejected. #(182.
PURCHASE PRICE: The Certificates of Participation shall be #184
sold for cash only. All bids must be for not less than all of the #185
Certificates of Participation and each bid shall state the purchase #(185:
price (not less than ninety-six percent (96%) of the principal amount #186
of the Certificates of Participation, plus accrued interest to the #187
date of delivery) at which the bidder offers to huy the Certificates #188
of Participation. Each bidder shall state in his bid the total net # (188)
interest cost in dollars and the average net interest rate determined #189
thereby, which shall be considered informative only and not a part of #190
the bid. # (190)
=4- #9
94948.1.2918 .01 :1 $\./
11IGHRST BID: The Certificates of Participation will be #192
awarded to the highest responsible bidder for Certificates of #(192.
Participation maturing in accordance with the Maturity Schedule. The #193 ,:
Maturity Schedule will be as set forth herein under •Maturities. " # (194:
With respect to all bids submitted for Certificates of Participation #195
maturing in accordance with the Maturity Schedule, the highest bid #196
will be determined by deducting the amount of the premium bid (if #197
any) from, and adding the amount of the discount bid (if any) to, the #198
total amount of interest which rlould be required to be paid on all #199
Certificates of Participation from , 198_ to their respec- #200
tive maturity dates at the applicable interest rate or rates speci- #201
fied in the bid, and the award will be made on the basis of the #202
lowest net interest cost. The successful bidder must pay accrued #203
interest, computed on a -day year basis, from the date of the #204
Certificates of Participation ( , 198_) to the date of # (2047
delivery. The cost sf printing the Certificates of Participation #205
will be borne by the Districts. #(205)
EIGHT OF REJECTION: The Districts reserve the right, in #207
their discretion, to reject any and all bids and, to the extent not #208
prohibited by law, to waive any irregularity sr informality in any #209
bid. #(209)
gROMPT AWARD: The Districts will take action awarding the #211
Certificates of Participation or rejecting all bids not later than #212
(_) hours after the time herein prescribed for the receipt of #213
bids; provided that the award may be made after the Expiration of the #214
specified time if the bidder shall not have given to the pistricts #215
�.d notice in writing of the withdrawal of such bid. Award of the #216
Certificates of Participation will be made by the Districts gxecuting #217
a counterpart of the proposal of the successful bidder, yhereupon the #218
accepted proposal with the Notice Inviting Bids annexed thereto shall #219
become effective as the Purchase Qontract without any separate execu- #220
tion thereof, and thereafter all rights 4f the Districts and of the #221
successful bidder shall be determined in accordance with the terms #222
thereof. Notice of the award will be given promptly to the success- #223
ful bidder. # (223:
_CUSIP: It is anticipated that CUSIP identification numbers #225
will be imprinted on the Certificates of Participation; however, such #(225)
numbers shall not constitute a part of the contract evidenced by the #226
Certificates of Participation and no liability shall hereafter be #227
attached to the Districts or any of the Officers or agents thereof #228
because of or on account of said numbers. Any Error or omission with #229
respect to said numbers shall not constitute _qause for refusal by the #230
successful bidder to accept delivery of and pay for the Certificates #231
of Participation. All expenses in relation to the printing of CUSIP #232
numbers on the 4Zertificates of Participation shall be paid for by the #233
Districts; provided, however, that the �USIP Service Bureau charge #234
-5- #9
94948.1.2918.01:1 # (9)
for the assignment of said numbers shall be the responsibility of and #bdl
shall be paid for by the successful bidder. # (235.
DELIVERY AND PAYMENT: Delivery of the Certificates of #237
Participation against payment therefor will be made to the successful #(237;
bidder at the principal office of the Trustee in #238
California, sr at such other place as may be agreed upon by the suc- #239
cessful bidder Ind the officer of the Districts making delivery. #240
Payment for the Certificates of Participation must be made by certi- #241
fied or official bank check in funds immediately available to the # (241;
Districts in , California. Qne Certificate of #242, :
Participation, registered in the name and address of the successful #(243,
bidder, gill be issued for each maturity date in the principal amount #244
(or portion thereof) maturing on such date, except with respect to #245
Certificates of Participation as to which jegistration information #246
(consisting of the names and addresses of the initial Legistered #247
owners of the Certificates of Participation and desired Certificate # (247;
of Participation denominations) is provided W the successful bidder #248
to the Trustee at least _ (_) business days prior to delivery of #249
the Certificates of Participation. #(249)
PROMPT DELIVERY; CANCELLATION FOR LATE DELIVERY: The #251
Certificates of Participation will be delivered to the successful # (251)
bidder on or about , 198_. .The Districts, It their sole #252,:
option, shall have the right to delay the delivery of the #(2541
.Certificates of Participation beyond said date; provided, however, #255
that the successful bidder ghall have the right, at its option, to
cancel the contract of purchase if the Districts shall fail to exe- #2'Y7
cute the Certificates of Participation and tender them for delivery #(257)
githin (_) days from the date herein fixed for the receipt sf #258,:
bids, and in such event the successful bidder shall be entitled to #260
the return of the proceeds of the check accompanying its hid. #261
ZORM OF BID: Each bid, together with the bid check, must #263
be in a sealed envelope, addressed to the Districts, with the #264
envelope clearly marked "Bid for the Purchase of $175,000 ,000 #265
Certificates of Participation Representing a Direct and Proportionate #266
Interest in Payments to be made by County Sanitation Districts #267
Nos. 1, 2,, 3, 5, 6 and 14 of Orange County, California, due under and #268
pursuant to an Agreement for the Acquisition and Construction of #269
Joint Facilities. Each bid must be unconditional and in accordance #270
with the terms Ind conditions set forth herein, or permitted herein, #271
and must be gubmitted on the bid form provided Jay the Districts. #272,:
kids must be received at the place first above described by 11 A.M. #274
Los Angeles time on July 30, 1986. #275
=6- #9
94948. 1.2918 . 01 :1 o*r
AID CHECK: A certified or official bank check drawn on a #277
�..i responsible bank or trust Qompany in the amount of Dollars #278
( $ ) , payable to the order of the Districts, must accompany #279
each bid as a guaranty that the bidder, if successful, will accept #280
and pay for the Certificates of Participation in jjccordance with the #281
terms of its bid. The check accompanying any accepted ¢id shall be #282
cashed and the proceeds thereof applied to the purchase price. If #283
such bid is accepted but not performed, unless such failure Qf per- #284
formance shall be caused by any act or omission of the Districts or #(284)
by a change in the tax-exempt status of the Certificates of # (284)
Participation (as provided below) , the proceeds of the check accompa- #285 ,2
nying any accepted bid shall be retained tzy the Districts. The check #287
accompanying each unaccepted bid will be returned promptly. f[o #288 ,2
interest will be allowed upon the deposit made by any bidder. # (289)
QEANGE IN TAX EXEMPT STATUS: At any time before the #291
Certificates of Participation are tendered for delivery by the dis- # (291)
tricts, the successful ¢idder may disaffirm and withdraw the bid if #292
the interest received by private holders from certificates of partic- #293
ipation of the same type and character shall be declared to be tax- #294
able income under present federal income tax laws, gither by a ruling #295
of the Internal Revenue Service or by a decision of any federal #296
court, or shall be declared taxable by the terms Qf any federal #297
income tax law enacted subsequent to the date of this notice. In #298
such event, the initial deposit in the amount of pollars #299
( S ) will be returned to the successful bidder. # (299)
IdEGAL OPINION: The opinion of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander #301
fi Ferdon, Los Angeles, California, gnd Rourke fi Woodruff, Orange, #302
California, Co-Special Counsel, approving the legality of the #303
Certificates of Participation and stating that interest on the # (303)
Certificates of Participation is exempt from Federal income taxes and #304
from State of California personal income taxes under existing stat- #305
utes, regulations, rulings and court decisions, gill be furnished the #306
successful bidder at or prior to the time of delivery Qf the #307
Certificates of Participation at the expense of the Districts. # (307:
QFFICIAL STATEMENT: Upon the determination of the success- #309
ful bidder, the Districts will prepare their final Official Statement #310
(the °Official Statement') with respect to the Qertificates of #311
Participation. The Districts will furnish to the successful bidder, # (311)
at no charge, such number of copies of the Official Statement (and #312
any amendment or supplement thereto) as the successful bidder may #313
reasonably request (but not to exceed _ (_) ) , for use in connec- #314
tion with any resale of the Certificates of Participation. # (314)
-7- #9
94948.1.2918.01 :1 # (9)
ALOE SKY LAWS: The successful bidder will be responsible #
for the clearance or exemption with respect to the status of the #317
Certificates of Participation for sale under the securities qr "Blue #318
Sky" laws of the several states and the preparation of any surveys or #319
memoranda in connection therewith. # (319:
CLOSING DOCDNENTS: In addition to the opinion of #321
Co-Special Counsel referred to above, at the time of payment for and #322
delivery of the Certificates of Participation, the Districts will # (322,
furnish the successful bidder the following documents, all to be #323
dated as of the date of delivery: #324
1. No Litigation Certificate - A certificate of Counsel to #326
the Districts certifying that there is no direct litigation pending #327
affecting the validity of the Certificates of Participation. # (327:
2. Signature Certificate - A certificate of the Trustee #329,:
indicating that it has signed the Certificates of Participation by #331
signature, and that it was duly authorized so to execute or #(331)
authenticate the same. #(331)
3_. Trustee's and Treasurer' s Receipts - The receipts of #333
the Trustee showing that the purchase price of the Certificates of #334,:
Participation, including accrued interest to the date of delivery, # (335)
has been received by the Trustee. #336
q. Certificate Concerning Official Statement - A certifi- 1
, �
cate of appropriate pfficers of the Districts, to the effect that to #3S4
the best of each such officer's knowledge and belief, and after cea- #340
sonable investigation, (a) neither the Official Statement nor any # (340)
amendment or supplement thereto contains any untrue statement of a #341
material tact or omits to state any material fact necessary to make #342
the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they #343
were made, not misleading; and (b) since the date of the Official #344
Statement, no event has occurred which should have been set forth in #345
an amendment or supplement to the Official Statement which has not #346
been set forth in such an amendment or supplement. #347
h. Opinion of Counsel to Districts - An opinion of Counsel #349
to the Districts that the activation and certain subsequent proce- #351
dures of the Districts have been taken in accordance with all appli- #352
cable laws. # (352:
§-. Arbitrage Certificate - A certificate of a responsible #354
officer of the Districts certifying that, on the basis of the facts, #355
estimates and circumstances in effect at the time of delivery of the #356
Certificates of Participation, it is not gxpected that the proceeds #357
of the Certificates of Participation will be used in a manner that # (357:
will cause the Certificates of Participation to be arbitrage bonds. #358
-8- #9
94948.1.2918.01 :1 #V.d
INFORMATION AVAILABLE: Requests for copies of the bid #360
`... form, the Trust Agreement, the Preliminary Official Statement and the # (360:
Acquisition and Construction Agreement or for other information con- #361
cerning the Districts, should be addressed to 4he Financial Advisor #362
to the Districts: Bartle Wells Associates, 1636 Bush Street, San # (362:
Francisco, California 94109 . Attention : Lora J. Stovall . #363
Telephone (415) 775-3113. #364
GIVEN by order of the Board of Directors of each District, #365
by resolution adopted on July 9, 1986. # (365:
#368
_QOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #369
NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(369)
CALIFORNIA # (369%
BY #371
Title: #372
(SEAL) #374
Attest: #376
#378
Secretary # (378)
.QOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #380
NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(380)
CALIFORNIA # (380)
BY #382
Title: #383
JSEAL) #385
Attest: #387
-9- #9
94948.1.2918.01 :1 # (9)
Secretary = i ;89
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #391
NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, # (391)
CALIFORNIA # (391 :
By 0393
Title: #394
(SEAL) #396
Attest : #398
#400
Secretary # (400)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #402
NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, # (A02)
CALIFORNIA # 2)
By #404
Title : #405
(SEAL) 0407
Attest : #409
4411
Secretary # (411)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #413
NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, #(413)
CALIFORNIA #(413:
-10- #9
94948.1 .2918.01 :1 #
By #415
Title: 0416
(SEAL) 4418
Attest: #420
#422
Secretary 4 (422
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #424
NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, # (424)
CALIPORNIA # (424.
By #426
Title: #427
SSEAL) #429
Attest: #433.
#433
Secretary # (433)
-11- #9
94948. 1. 2918.01 :1 # (9)
7/2/86 #3
BID FOR THE PURCHASE OF 46
5175,000,000 CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION #7
REPRESENTING A DIRECT AND PROPORTIONATE INTEREST IN PAYMENTS TO #8,9
BE MADE BY # (9)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #12
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 413
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #14
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #15
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #16
_ and #17
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #18
DUE UNDER AND PURSUANT TO AN #21
AGREEMENT FOR THE ACQUISITION AND #22
CONSTRUCTION OF JOINT FACILITIES #23
County Sanitation Districts July 30, 1986 #26
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 14 of #27
Qrange County, California #28
Fountain Valley, California #29
Qn behalf of a group which we have formed, and pursuant and #31 ,3:
subject to the related Notice Inviting Bids (hereby incorporated # (32)
herein by reference) , we offer to purchase the Certificates of #33
Participation representing a direct and proportionate interest in #34
payments to be made by County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 #35
and 14 of Orange County, California (the "Certificates of #36
Participation") , in total aggregate principal amount of $175,000,000 #37
and in accordance with the following Maturity Schedule: #38
Maturity Schedule #42
Maturity Maturity #45
Date Principal Interest Date Principal Interest #46
_ Amount Rate Amount Rate #47 ,4F
198 8 199 8 #51
198 8 199 8 #52
198 8 199 8 #53
198 8 199 8 #54
199 8 199 8 #55
199 8 200 8 #56
1.99 8 200 8 #57
1.99 8 200 8 #58
199 8 200 8 #59
And to pay therefor the aggregate sum of $ plus #62
interest accrued on the Certificates of Participation to the date of #63
delivery thereof. # (63)
.There is enclosed herewith a certified or official bank #65
check in the amount of is ) , payable to the order of #66
the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 14 of Grange i67
County, California. # (67)
There is submitted below a memorandum (which does not con- 468
stitute a part of this bid) stating the total net interest cost in 469
dollars on the Certificates of Participation during the life of the 370
issue (deducting the amount of any premium pr adding the amount of ;71, 7:
any discount) , and the average net interest rate determined thereby. $73
A list of the other members (if any) of our underwriting 474
group, which list is subject to change by us at any time prior to 475
delivery of the Certificates of Participation, is attached or set 3 (75)
forth on the reverse hereof. # (75)
Respectfully submitted, i78
Address #79
Name 081
jAccount Manager) $82
By: i84
i85
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY i87
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 AND 14 t88
4F ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA #89
v
By: Date : July 30 , 1986 i92
i93
t95
( MEMORANDUM 1 t97
1 i99
1 (For information only--not part of bid) 1 1100
i 1 s101
[ Interest payable from through . . 5 1 4102
1 1 5103
( Plus discount (or less premium) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 i105
1 1 s107
1 Total net interest cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1 i108,1
i 1 i110
[ Average net interest rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1 f112
[ 1 #114
MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEJXANDER S FERDON
SUITE 2020
1OOe cam 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE wca.x��iysuc..n 3•01
LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90071 ao a.... .
w.eax~.•x. '. oav 213-613-1112 ..x. o .. .. .
June 27, 1986
California Debt Advisory Commission
P.O. Box 1919
Sacramento, California 95809
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find one (1) original and one copy (1)
of each of six (6) Reports of Proposed Debt Issuance of County
Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 14 of Orange County
for Certificates of Participation.
Please date stamp the copy of each Report of Proposed
Debt Issuance and return to us in the enclosed self-addressed
stamped envelope.
Sincerely,
Shauna Rothkopf I "
SR/mdm
Enclosure
California Debt Advisory Commission
P.O. Box 1919, Sacramento , CA 95909
( 916)324-2585
,_ ompletion and timely submittal of this form to the California Je3:
advisory Commission (CDAC) at the above address mill assure your compii ti -=
Mitn existing California State law- and will assist in the maintenance of i
complete data base . Thank you for your cooperation .
NAME OF ISSUER: County Sanitation District No. 1 of Oranqe Cour-v
ADDRESS OF ISSUER: 10844 Cilis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 COUNTY: Cranae
PROPOSED SALE DATE: July 30, 1986
TYPE OF SALE: X Competitive Negotiated
PROPOSED PRINCIPAL TO BE SOLD: f 27,000, 000 (estimate )
TYPE OF TAX-EXEMPT DEBT INSTRLA ENT
( ) Note ( ) Bond
Tax anticipation _ General obligation
—_ Tax and revenue Limited tax obligation
anticipation _ Revenue (Public enterprise )
Revenue anticipation Conduit revenue (Private
Bond anticipation — obligor )
Grant anticipation Special assessment
_ Tax allocation
_ Public lease revenue
( ) Tax-Exempt Lease ( ) Commercial Paper
�(X) Certificates of Participation
( ) Otner (Please specify. )
IS DEBT FOR REFUNDING? X No Yes Partial f
SOURCE(S) OF REPAYMENT —
_ Public enterprise revenues Tax-increment
Private obligor payments Special assessments
Bond proceeds Special tax revenues'
Grants Property tax revenues
Intergovernmental transfers General fund of issuing
other than grants jurisdiction
Other`
Please specify: All legally available monies from whatever sources.
-Section 8855(g) of the California Government Code requires the issuer of
any proposed new debt issue of State or local government to give .vrltten
notice of the proposed sale to the CDAC no later than 10 days prior to tie
sale .
w 4/ 84
?' :po3rd Deot i333ance
PURPOSE(S) OF FINANCING
Cash- flow Pollution control
Single- family -housing Solid waste recover/
Nlultifam�iy housing' facilities
_ Hospital Equipment
Otuer iealth care Flood control / storm
facilities` drainage
.Airport Water supply and distributi >n
Ports and marinas L Wastewater collection and
_ Recreation and sports treatment
facilities Public transit
Power generation Bridges and highways
Power transmission Public building
Parking Other capital imprivemen : 3
Convention center and public works
K- 12 school facility Commercial development `
College/university facility Industrial development -
_ Redevelopment ` Other
`Please specify type/name of facility:
BOND COUNSEL: "fudge Rose Guthrie Alexander 6 Pardon; Rourke 6 i;codr'_=t
FINANCIAL ADVISOR: Bartle Wells Associates
LEAD UNDERWRITER:
(or PURCHASES, if private placement . )
Name of individual (representing x Bond Counsel , Issuer , or
Lead Underwriter ) who has completed this form and may be contacted for
Turther inform Lion:
Name: Edward W. Long, Esq.
Firm/Agency: Nudge Rose Guthrie Alexander 6 Ferdgn
Address : 333 South Grand Ave, Suite 2020
Los Angeles, California 90071
Phone: ( 213 ) 613-1112 Date of Completion:
Contact person at issuing juriadiction, if different from above:
Name: William H. Butler
Title: Director of Finance, County Sanitation Districts or Orance Cocncy
Address : P.O. Box 8127 , Fountain Vallev, CA 92708
Phone: (714 ) 540-1910
5114/ 84
dE?:HT :)F PAUP)SED oEar
California Debt Advisory Commission
P.O. Box 1919, Sacramento , CA 95809
( 916)324-2585
\,wLompletion and timely submittal of this form to the California D-. :
Advisory Commission (COAC) at the above address will assure your compiiin �z
sitn existing California State law• and will assist in the maintenance of _
complete data base . Thank- you for your cooperation .
NAME OF ISSUER: County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County
ADDRESS OF ISSUER: 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 COUNTY: Orange
PROPOSED SALE DATE: July 30, 1986
TYPE OF SALE: _ X Competitive Negotiated
PROPOSED PRINCIPAL TO BE SOLD: f 51 ,000,000 (estimate )
TYPE OF TAX-EXEMPT DEBT INSTRUMENT
( ) Note ( ) Bond
Tax anticipation General obligation
Tax and revenue Limited tax obligation
anticipation _ Revenue (Public enterprise )
Revenue anticipation Conduit revenue (Private
Bond anticipation — obligor )
Grant anticipation Special assessment
Tax allocation
_ Public lease revenue
( ) Tax-Exempt Lease ( ) Commercial Paper
(X) Certificates of Participation -
( ) Other (Please specify. )
IS DEBT FOR REFUNDING? X No Yes Partial f
SOURCE(S) OF REPAYMENT
_ Public enterprise revenues _ Tax-increment
Private obligor payments Special assessments
Bond proceeds Special tax revenues
Grants Property tax revenues
Intergovernmental transfers General fund of issuing
o thTr than grants jurisdiction
�- Other
Please specify: All legally available monies from whatever sources.
*Section 8855(g) of the California Government Code requires the issuer of
any proposed new debt issue of State or local government to give written
notice of the proposed sale to the CDAC no later than 10 days prior to the
gale .
` Wl 14/84
' »u37d Debt I33 Ida ze
PURPOSE(S) OF FINANCING
Cash-flow Pollution control
Single- family housing Solid waste recovery
Muitifamtly housing' — facilities
Hospital Equipment
Other health care Flood control/storm
facilities} drainage
Airport Water supply and distribution
Ports and marinas -X Wastewater collection and
Recreation and sports treatment
facilities Public transit
Power generation' Bridges and highways
Power transmission Public building
Parking Other capital imprYvements
_ Convention center and public works
_ R- 12 school facility Commercial development ,
_ College/university facility Industrial development
_ Redevelopment+ - Other
Please specify type/name of facility:
BOND COUNSEL: Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon; Rourke & Woodruff
FINANCIAL ADVISOR: Bartle Wells Associates
LEAD UNDERWRITER:
(or PURCHASER, if private placement . )
-
Name of individual (representing x Bond Counsel , Issuer , or
Lead Underwriter) who has competed this form a—nd may be contacted for
T' tber information:
Name: Edward W. Long, Esq.
Firm/Agency: Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon
Address : 333 South Grand Ave, Suite 2020
Los Angeles, California 90071
Phone: (213) 613-1112 Date of Completion:
Contact person at issuing Jurisdiction, if different from above:
Name: William H. Butler
Title: Director of Finance, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Address : P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Phone: (714I 54n-2g10
5/ 14/ 84
Califoraia Debt Advisory Commission
P.O. Box 1919, Sacramento , CA 95809
( 916)024-2585
.. amp lation and timely submittal of this form to the California
idvisory Cormisslon (CDAC) at the above address Nil ( assure your comp ,. :? .
mitn existing California State law- and Nill assist in the mainteiance �' •�
complete data base . Thank you for your cooperation .
MAKE OF ISSUER: County Sanitation District No. 3 of Ors-ce -
ADDRESS OF ISSUER: 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Vallev, CA 92708 COUNTY: Orana-
PROPOSED SALE DATE: July 30, 1966
TYPE OF SALE: _ Competitive Negotiated
PROPOSED PRINCIPAL TO BE SOLD: $ 55 , 250 , 000 (estimate_ )
TYPE OF TAX-EXEMPT DEBT INSTRUBQ24T
( ) Note ( ) Bond
Tax anticipation General obligation
Tax and revenue Limited tax obligation
anticipation _ Revenue (Public enterprise )
_ Revenue anticipation Conduit revenue (Private
Bond anticipation obligor )
Grant anticipation Special assessment
Tax allocation
_ Public lease revenue
( ) Tax-Exempt Lease ( ) Commercial Paper
(X) Certificates of Participation
( ) Other (Please specify. )
IS DEBT FOR REFUNDING? X No Yes Partial f
SOURCE(S) OF REPAYMENT
_ Public enterprise revenues Tax-Increment
_ Private obligor payments Special assessments
_ Bond proceeds Special tax revenues *
Grants Property tax revenues
Intergovernmental transfers General fund of issuing
other than grants jurisdiction
Other`
Please specify: All legally available monies from whatever sources.
-Section 8855(g) of the California Government Code requires the issuer Df
any proposed new debt issue of State or local government to give Nrit : en
notice of the proposed sale to the CDAC no later than 10 days prior tj : :a
- • l e .
'v114/ 84
?- )posed Deot 13313m:e
PURPOSE(S) OF FINANCING
Cash- flow Pollution control
_ Single- family housing Solid waste recovery
_ Multifamily housing` facilities
_ Hospital'. Equipment
Other neaith care Flood control /storm
facilities' — drainage
Airport Water supply and distribution
ports and marinas Wastewater collection and
Recreation and sports treatment
facilities public transit
Power generation _ Bridges and highways
Power transmission Public building
_ Parking Other capital improvements
Convention center and public works
K- 12 school facility Commercial development
_ College/university facility Indus#rial development
_ Redevelopment' Other
'Please specify type/name of facility:
BOND COUNSEL: Nudge Rose Guthrie Alexander 6 Ferdon; Rourke 6 Woodra =
FINANCIAL ADVISOR: Bartle Wells Associates
LEAD UNDEIBYRITER:
(or PURCRASER, if private placement
a.i
Name of individual (representing x Bond Counsel , Issuer , or
Lead Underwriter) who has completed this form s�' may be contacted for
iucther informstioa:
Same: Edward W. Long, Esq.
Firm/Agency: Nudge Rose Guthrie Alexander 5 Ferdon
Address : 333 South Grand Ave, Suite 2020
Los Angeles, California 90071
Phone: (213) 613-1112 Date of Completion:
Contact person at Issuing Jurisdiction , if different from above:
Same: William H. Butler
Title: Director of Finance, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
.Address : P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Phone: t7141 540-2e10
5/ li/ 84
iE?:RT )F 2 ED .iE a' :3::-_tiCE
California Debt Advisory Commission
P.O. Box 1919, Sacramento , CA 95809
( 916)024-2585
Comp! at ion and timely submittal of this form to the California De,-
advisory Commission (COAC) at the above address -.mill assure your compj , i•,
witn existing California State Law* and will assist in the maintenance of i
complete data base . Thank you for your cooperation .
MAKE OF ISSUER: County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange Coua`_v
ADDRESS OF ISSUER: 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 COUICTY: Crance
PROPOSED SALE DATE: July 30, 1986
TYPE OF SALE: X Competitive Negotiated
PROPOSED PRINCIPAL TO BE SOLD: f 9,700 , '00 (estimate)
TYPE OF TAX-EXEMPT DEBT INSTRUMENT
( ) Note ( ) Bond
_ Tax anticipation _ General obligation
_ Tax and revenue Limited tax obligation
anticipation _ Revenue (Public enterprise )
_ Revenue anticipation Conduit revenue (Private
_ Bond anticipation obligor )
Grant anticipation Special assessment
_ Tax allocation
_ Public lease revenue
( ) Tax-Exempt Lease ( ) Commercial Paper
(X) Certificates of Participation
( ) Otner (Please specify. )
IS DEBT FOR REFUNDING? X No Yes Partial f
SOURCE(S) OF REPAYMENT
Public enterprise revenues Tax-Increment
Private obligor payments Special assessments
_ Bond proceeds Special tax revenues'
Grants Property tax revenues
Intergovernmental transfers General fund of issuing
other than grants jurisdiction
Otner'
'Please specify: All legally available monies from whatever sources .
-Section 8855(g) of the California Government Code requires the issuer of
any proposed new debt issue of State or local government to give written
notice of the proposed sale to the CDAC no later than 10 days prior to : 1e
Is .
`�/ 14/ 84
:J4c: 2e2ort : : Pr :pos ed De of Issaaace
PURPOSE(S) OF FINANCING
Cash- flow Pollution control
Single- family housing Solid waste recovery
Multifamily housing- facilities
_ Hospital Equipment
Other nealth.care Flood control/storm
faciltties — drainage
Airport Water supply and distribuci ,n
Ports and marinas -- Wastewater collection and
Recreation and sports treatment
facilities public transit
Power generation Bridges and highways
Power transmission public building
Parking — Other capital improvements
Convention center and public works
K- 12 school facility Commercial development '
College/university facility = Industrial development
_ Redevelopment _ Other
Please specify type/name of facility:
BOND COUNSEL: Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander a Pardon; Rourke s wccdr,i-
FINANCIAL ADVISOR: Bartle Wells Associates
LEAD UNDERWRITER:
(or PURCRASER, if private placement . )
Name of Individual (representing x Boad Counsel , Issuer , or
Lead Underwriter ) who has completed this form a-G-T may be contacted for
Turther Information:
Yame: Edward W. Long, Esq.
Firm/Agency: Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander s Ferdon
Address : 333 South Grand Ave, Suite 2020
Los Angeles, California 90071
Phone: (213 ) 613-1112 Date of Completion:
Contact person at issuing Jurisdiction, if different from above;
Name: William H. Butler
Title: Director of Finance, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Address : P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Phone: (714 ) 540-2g10
5/ 14/84
REPORT OF PROPOSED DEBT ISSUANCE
California Debt Advisory Commission
P.O. Box 1919, Sacramento , CA 95809
`J ( 916)224-2585
Completion and timely submittal of this form to the California Debt
Advisory Commission (CDAC) at the above address will assure your compliance
with existing California State law* and will assist in the maintenance of a
complete data base . Thank you for your cooperation .
HAKE OF ISSUER: County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County
ADDRESS OF ISSUER: 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 COUNTY Orange
PROPOSED SALE DATE: July 30, 1986
TYPE OF SALE: X Competitive Negotiated
PROPOSED PRINCIPAL TO BE SOLD: $ 9,850 ,000 (estimate)
TYPE OF TAX-EXEMPT DEBT INSTRUMElf[
( ) Note ( ) Bond
_ Tax anticipation General obligation
_ Tax and revenue Limited tax obligation
anticipation Revenue (Public enterprise )
_ Revenue anticipation Conduit revenue (Private
Bond anticipation obligor )
Grant anticipation Special assessment
_ Tax allocation
_ Public .lease revenue
Tax-Exempt Lease, ( ) Commercial Paper
(X) Certificates of .Participation
( ) Other (Please specify. )
IS DEBT FOR REFUNDING? X No Yes Partial $
SOURCE(S) OF BEPAYXE?" —
_ Public enterprise revenues Tax-increment
Private obligor payments Special assessments
Bond proceeds Special tax revenues+
Grants Property tax revenues
Intergovernmental transfers General fund of issuing
oth#r than grants jurisdiction
Otner
+Please specify: All legally available monies from whatever sources.
*Section 8855(g) of the California Government Code requires the issuer of
any proposed new debt issue of State or local government to give w: itten
! ice of the proposed sale to the CDAC no later than 10 days prior to the
fie .
5/ 14/ 84
CDAC: Report of Proposed Debt Issuance Page 2
PURPOSE(S) OF FINANCING
Cash-flow Pollution control
Single-family housing Solid waste recovery
Multiramily housing facilities
Hospital Equipment
Other healthcare Flood control/storm
facilities` drainage
Airport Water supply and distribution
ports and marinas -Z Wastewater collection and
Recreation and sports treatment
facilities Public transit
Power generation` Bridges and highways
power transmission Public building
Parking — Other capital imprgvements
Convention center and public works
K- 12 school facility Commercial development
College/unlve�slty facility Industrial development'
_ Redevelopment Other
+Please specify type/name of facility:
BOND COUNSEL: Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander 6 Ferdon; Rourke 6 Woodruff
FINANCIAL ADVISOR: Bartle Wells Associates
LEAD UNDERWRITER:
(or PURCHASER, if private placement
.
Name of individual (representing x Hood Counsel , Issuer , or
Lead Underwriter ) who has completed this form and may be contacted for
Turther Information:
Edward W. Long, Esq.
Name:
Firm/Agency: Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander 6 FPrdnn
Address : 333 South Grand Ave, Suite 2020
Los Angeles, California 90071
Phone: , ( 213 ) 613-1112 Date of Completion:
Contact person at Issuing Jurisdiction, if different from above:
Name: William H. Butler
Title: Director of Finance, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Address : P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Phone: (714 ) 540-2910
5/ 14/ 84
California Debt Advisory Cotvaission
P.O. Box 1919, Sacramento , CA 95809
( 916) 224-2585
'Complation and timely submittal of this form to the California Do; :
advisory -onmiss ( on (CDAC) at the above address rill assure your comp; It; _r
vitn existing California State lam- and will assist in the maintenance �f
implete data base . Thank you for your cooperation .
NAKE OF ISSUER: County Sanitation District No . 14 of Orance Counry
ADDRESS OF ISSUER: 10844 Ellis Avenue
Four.tai❑ Vallev, CA 92708 COUNTY: Oran.ae
PROPOSED SALE DATE: .7uly 30 , 1986
TYPE OF SALE: v Competitive Negotiated
PROPOSED PRINCIPAL TO BE SOLD: $ 10 ,900 , 000 (estimate)
TYPE OF TAX-EXEMPT DEBT INSTRUAQ1iT
( ) Note ( ) Bond
_ Tax anticipation _ General obligation
Tax and revenue Limited tax obligation
anticipation _ Revenue (Public enterprise )
_ Revenue anticipation Conduit revenue (Private
Bond anticipation — obligor )
—_ Grant anticipation Special assessment
Tax allocation
Public lease revenue
( ) Tax-Exempt Lease ( ) Commercial Paper
(XS Certificates of Participation
( ) Other (Please specify. )
IS DEBT FOR REFUNDING? X No Yes Partial f
SOURCES) OF REPAYMENT
Public enterprise revenues Tax-increment
Private obligor payments Special assessments
Bond proceeds Special tax revenues`
Grants Property tax revenues
Intergovernmental transfers General fund of issuing
other than grants jurisdiction
Other`
Please specify: All legally available monies from whatever sources.
*section 8855(g) of the California Government Code requires the issuer of
any proposed nem debt issue of State or local government to give m, ittea
notice of the proposed sale to the CDAC no later than 10 days prior to
le .
Tu% 14/ 84
PURPOSE(S) OF FINANCING
Cash- flow Pollution cont . i ,
_ Single- family nousin; Solid waste ,-eco :er.
:Nuitifamily housing facili ti es
Hospital Equipment
Otter aeelth care Flood controiista,-m
facilkties� drainage -
Airport Water sappl and d
Ports and marinas ` wastewater collection and .
Recreation and sports treatment
facilities _ Public transit
Power generation Bridges and hLgiwa73
Power transmission public building
Parking Other Capital imprivemenri
_ Convention center and public works _
ti- 12 school facility Commercial development
College/university facility Industrial development -
- Redevelopment' — Other
Please specify type/name of facility:
BOND COUNSEL: Nudge Rose Guthrie Alexander s Pardon; Rourke i wcccr:'_'
FINANCIAL ADVISOR: Bartle Wells Associates
LEAD UNDERWRITER:
(or PURCHASER, if private placement . )
Name of Individual (representing x Bond Counsel , Issuer , or
Lead Underwriter) who has completed this form and may be contacted for
Wither informations
Same: Edward W. Long, Esq.
Firm/agency: Nudge Rose Guthrie Alexander 5 _
Address : 333 South Grand Ave, Suite 2020 =
Los Angeles, California 90071
Phone: (213) 613-1112 Date of Completion:
Contact person at issuing Jurisdiction , if different from above:
Name: William H. Butler
Title: Director of Finance, County Sanitation Dis:r_ccs of --
Address : P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Phone: (7141 94n-?gin
3/ 14/ 84
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 18
July 9, 1986
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE FISCAL POLICY COKMITTEE
RE DISTRICTS' LIABILITY INSURANCE
At the Fiscal Policy Committee meeting on Wednesday, June 25th, the Committee
reviewed the available public liability insurance coverage and associated
premiums presented by the Districts' insurance broker, as directed by the Joint
Boards.
In addition to a substantial increase in premium (from $158,728 to $430,705) as
well as an increase in the deductible, the insurers had proposed changes in the
policy form to a "claims made" instead of a "claims incurred" basis and,
further, that costs of defending the claims would be paid out of the limitations
of coverage so that only the resulting net amount would be available to satisfy
judgments.
Because of the significant changes in the cost and levels of coverage, the
Fiscal Policy Committee directed the Districts' staff and broker to extend the
primary level ($975,000) of Excess Liability insurance for two weeks from July
1, 1986 to July 15, 1986 at a premium not to exceed $12,000 as an interim
measure pending further evaluation of liability insurance alternatives. (This
option was available because the insurer of the primary level of coverage was
agreeable to it. The insurers of the second and third levels of excess
liability coverage in the amount of $5 million each were not willing to extend
their coverage for a like period) .
The Committee also directed the staff to identify and evaluate various
alternatives to the coverage presented by the broker and report back to the
Committee on July 3rd.
The Committee met on Thursday, July 3rd, to review alternatives to the
Districts' existing public liability insurance coverage and to select a suitable
alternative for fiscal year 1966-87 as directed by the Joint Boards at the June
11, 1986 regularly scheduled Board meeting.
The Committee reviewed various alternatives to the Districts' existing public
liability coverage, including:
- full self-insurance for the Districts' public liability risk management
program
- participation in either industry-based or other public agency pooled
risk-sharing arrangements
- the availability of coverage with an increased deductible/self-insured
retention level of up to $1 million
- segregation of the general liability portion of the coverage from the
automobile liability portion and use of separate sources of coverage
for the two areas of risk.
Detailed discussions of each of these alternatives are presented in the report
entitled: PRELIMINARY REPORT - EVALUATION OF DISTRICTS' LIABILITY INSURANCE
ALTERNATIVES, which was previously mailed to Directors with the agenda material
�..i for the July 9, 1986 meeting of the Joint Boards.
RECOMMENDATIONS
After careful consideration of the alternatives as set forth in the above
referenced preliminary report, and given the limited coverage available at
substantially increased costs, it is the recommendation of the Fiscal Policy
Committee that the Joint Districts discontinue liability insurance and convert
to a fully self-funded program effective July 15, 1986.
A fully self-funded liability program is feasible only if the Joint Districts
agree to share the costs on the same basis as other joint costs are shared which
is based on each District's flow. Accordingly, the Committee has directed the
General Counsel to prepare an interdistrict agreement setting forth such an
agreement for consideration by the Directors.
If the Districts' Boards concur with the Committee's recommendations, the
following actions would be appropriate:
1. Consideration of motion directing staff and the General Counsel to
develop and implement a fully self-funded insurance program for the
Districts' public liability risk management program effective July 15,
1986.
2. Consideration of Resolution No. approving an interdistrict
agreement setting forth the teems and conditions for collective
risk-sharing and premium contributions to support a fully self-funded
public liability program (see attached) .
3. Consideration of motion directing staff to transfer 1986-87 budgeted
liability insurance premium contributions into the Public Liability
Self-Insured Fund reserve account (estimated 1986-87 contributions:
$258,000) .
4. Consideration of motion directing staff and general counsel to continue
to explore all potentially reasonable alternatives for providing future
excess public liability insurance coverage for review and evaluation by
the Fiscal Policy Committee.
Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman
Don R. Griffin
Carol Rawanami
Philip Maurer
James Neal
James Wahner
-2-
AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING POOLING PROGRAM
FOR SELF-INSURANCE FOR
GENERAL AND VEHICLE PUBLIC LIABILITY
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 9th day of July, 1986, 1986, to
be effective July 15, 1986, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, each being a separate
public agency, duly organized and existing under the County Sanitation District
Act and each hereinafter referred to as "District" and collectively sometimes
hereinafter referred to as "Districts".
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Districts have been partially legally self-insured for general
and vehicle public liability coverage since 1979 by the establishment of a
separate Public Liability Self-Insured Accounting Fund (the "Fund"), effective
July 1, 1979, with an initial deposit for reserve of $250,000.00; and,
WHEREAS, the Districts have adopted a policy of continuing to carry excess
public liability insurance since establishment of the Fund; and,
WHEREAS, major increases in premiums, associated reductions in coverage,
and difficulties in placing and maintaining coverage over the past three years
have caused the Districts to conduct a reexamination of this policy; and,
WHEREAS, the Districts' Fiscal Policy Committee and Boards of Directors
have determined, after consideration of all of the alternative liability
insurance risk management programs, that adoption and implementation of a full,
legally self-insured, general and vehicle public liability program is in the
best interest and to the advantage of each District and is feasible for all of -
the Districts if all of the Districts agree to operate the program on a pooled
basis, sharing the risks and payment of all claims collectively from the
-1-
reserves budgeted in the Districts' Fund pursuant to the terms and conditions
set forth herein; and,
\� WHEREAS, the Districts have authority pursuant to the County Sanitation
District Act and the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement among
the Districts to enter this Agreement on the basis of the terms and conditions
set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN EACH OF THE DISTRICTS,
PARTIES HERETO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Public Liability Self—Insured Fund, established effective
July 1, 1979, shall continue to exist to pay all claims brought against the
Districts.
Section 2: Each District shall be responsible to budget and pay its
proportion of the expenses necessary to operate the Fund, which shall be that
proportion of the requisite funds equal to the proportion of the annual
gallonage flows from each District to the total annual gallonage flows from all
Districts. The proportion allocatable to each District shall be computed at
least annually, as more specifically set forth in Article IV of the Joint
Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, as amended, effective July 1,
1985, between the Districts.
Section 3: Each District shall, from time to time, transfer so much of its
operating funds into the Fund as may be necessary to maintain reserves in said
Fund at a level projected to be sufficient to pay the cost of all losses and
expenses relating to claims made against the Districts, or any of them, each
fiscal year. In the event that losses and expenses exceed the Fund reserves,
necessitating additional funds to be provided by each District, said funds shall
be transferred from either the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund or its
Facilities Revolving Fund, as determined by the Board of Directors of each
District.
—2—
Section 4: The annual budgets of each District shall provide for
sufficient funds to provide a sufficient balance in the Fund to meet projected
expenses and losses relating to claims during the ensuing fiscal year.
Section 5: In any year subsequent to a year in which the Fund has been
exhausted due to the payment of losses and expenses relating to claims, each
District shall be responsible to transfer funds equal to its proportion of the
expenses necessary to restore and operate the Fund in the ensuing year on the
basis of the same proportion of the requisite funds as described in Section 2
above.
Section 6: This Agreement shall continue in effect so long as it shall be
to the interest and advantage of the Districts to maintain a full, legally
self-insured, general and vehicle public liability program. If at any time it
should cease to be to the interest and advantage of the Districts to continue
this Agreement and the Board of Directors shall so find and declare by
resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of Districts, it shall be
terminated, and the Districts' General Manager and Director of Finance shall be
directed to immediately seek to procure public liability insurance for the
Districts.
Section 7: This Agreement may be amended by unanimous vote of all of the
existing Districts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the
day and year first above written. -
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman
By
�../ Secretary
-3-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT VO. 2 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman
By
Secretary
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 110. 3 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman
By
Secretary
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10. 5 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
i
By
Chairman
By
Secretary
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0. 6 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman
By
Secretary
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
v Chairman
By
Secretary
-4-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman
By
Secretary
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman
By
Secretary
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman
By
Secretary
_g_ -
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
JULY 9, 1986
1 ) PROPOSED DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL RESEARCH PROJECT.
AS YOU KNOW, FOR MANY YEARS THE DISTRICTS HAVE BEEN WORKING
ON A PROPOSED RESEARCH PROJECT TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTS OF
DISCHARGING PRECONDITIONED SLUDGE IN THE DEEP OCEAN OFF OUR
COASTLINE. RECENTLY THIS PROPOSAL HAS RECEIVED CONSIDERABLE
MEDIA ATTENTION. UNFORTUNATELY, THE ACCOUNTS IN THE LOCAL PRESS
HAVE NOT GIVEN AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSAL AND, IN
FACT, HAVE BEEN MISLEADING.
I BELIEVE THIS MISINFORMATION IS A REAL DISSERVICE TO THE
PUBLIC AND I HOPE TO MEET WITH THE EDITOR OF THE DAILY PILOT TO
DISCUSS THE MERITS OF THE PROGRAM AND ASK THAT THEY DO AN .
OBJECTIVE FOLLOW-UP ARTICLE.
2) STRINGFELLOW LONG-RANGE REMEDIAL PROGRAM
INCLUDED WITH YOUR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORT IN THIS
EVENING'S AGENDA PACKAGE IS INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE
STUDY OF LONG-RANGE ALTERNATIVES FOR CLEAN-UP OF THE STRINGFELLOW
SITE.
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE HAD DIRECTED THE STAFF TO REQUEST A
SPECIAL BRIEFING FOR THE BOARDS BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
SERVICES ON A NIGHT OTHER THAN THE REGULAR MEETING, AND DOHS HAS
SUGGESTED THE FOLLOWING ALTERNATIVES:
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20TH
OR
THURSDAY, AUGUST 21ST
EDNESDAY, AUGUST 27TH�
POLL DIRECTORS TO FIND OUT IF ANY OF THESE ARE CONVENIENT
DATES.
-I-
q 3) PRESENTATION OF PLAQUES
A. DON ROTH, CHAIRMAN OF DISTRICT No. 3
JULY, 1984 - MAY, 1986
(ASK DON ROTH TO COME FORWARD TO ACCEPT A PLAQUE FROM THE
BOARDS IN APPRECIATION FOR DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE AS
CHAIRMAN OF DISTRICT No. 3 FROM JULY, 1984 THROUGH MAY, 1986)
B. EDWARD R. "TED" FRANCIS - 25 YEAR SERVICE PLAQUE
(ASK DISTRICT EMPLOYEE TED FRANCIS TO STEP FORWARD AND
RECEIVE A SERVICE AWARD IN RECOGNITION OF 25 YEARS OF
FAITHFUL SERVICE TO THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS)
MR. FRANCIS IS A PRINCIPAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATEE IN OUR
.ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. HIS PRIMARY JOB IS TO ASSURE THAT THE
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN CONSTRUCTION OF NEW FACILITIES AT THE
TREATMENT PLANT SITES ARE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS.
4) FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT.
DIRECTOR DAN GRISET HAS STEPPED DOWN FROM THE FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE AND I WOULD LIKE TO APPOINT DIRECTOR JOHN SUTTON TO
FILL THE VACANCY ON THE COMMITTEE.
I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THOSE DIRECTORS THAT HAVE EXPRESSED
INTEREST AND VOLUNTEERED TO SERVE NOT ONLY ON THE FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE BUT ON OTHER COMMITTEES AS WELL.
THE COMMITTEES PUT IN A LOT OF HARD WORK AND LONG HOURS IN
THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNMENTS WHICH I SINCERELY APPRECIATE.
-2-
5) UPCOMING MEETINGS
A. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE — THE REGULAR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
MEETING DATE IS JULY 23RD. HOWEVER, STAFF HAS JUST
LEARNED THAT MANY OF THE DIRECTORS WILL BE ATTENDING
THE CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF CITIES MEETING IN MONTEREY
THAT WEEK. I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT THE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEET.Iq BE HELD THE FOLLOWING
oA
WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, A $' .M. INSTEAD.
INVITE TWO of THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND:
91KE BEVERAGE ND CCHARD BUCK
OR
FRANK CLIFT OR NORMAN CULVER
B. DISTRICTS 1 ,2,3,5-Al & 14 WILL BE CONSIDERING LATER
THIS EVENING UNDER AGENDA ITEM No. 15 WHETHER TO
PROCEED WITH ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF
PARTICIPATION FOR PARTIALLY FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF
SEWERAGE FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS.
FOR THOSE DISTRICTS ELECTING TO PROCEED, WE HAVE
TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED AN ADJOURNED MEETING AT 7:30
P.M. ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, TO TAKE THE APPROPRIATE
FINAL ACTIONS.
THE DIRECTORS WILL CONSIDER ADJOURNMENT AS PART OF
AGENDA ITEM 150) (4) .
—3—
• MEETING DATE July 9, 1986 TIME 7'30 9TA DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11 , 13 S 14
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
(SALTARELL1)...HOESTEREY... (MANDIC).........BAILEY......J�
(CRANK)........HANSON...... (MURPHY).........BEVERAGE... .J�
N—/ (LUXEMBOURGER).GRISET...... wSye.r (ZIEGLER)........BUCK........
L
(WIEDER).......STANTON.....AL (HORSY)..........CATLIN......JC
(RISHER)....... ..CLIFT. ...... .i
DISTRICT 2 (PERRY)..........CULVER......JC
(SALTARELLI).....EOGAR... .....LC _
(HORSY)........CATLIN......SG (REESE)..........GR I FFIN. .....
(ZIEGLER)......BUCK........JL (LUXEMBOURGER)...GRI SET.... ..
(LUXEMBOURGER).GRISET......JG (CRANK)..........HANSON.... ..J�
(SILZEL).......KAWANAMI....AL (COX)....... .. .. .HART...... ....
(WEDEL)........MAHONEY...... (SALTARELLU.. .. .HOESTEREY. ..JL_
(BEVERRGE)....dWRMM.......yi (SILZEL).........KAWANAMI.. _jg[f
(SCOTT)........MEAL........J� (SALTARELLI).....KENNEDY... ..Ju
(CULVER).......PERRY.......JG (WEDEL)..........MAHONEY.....Je
(OVERHOLT).....ROTH........JG, (COX)............MAURER...... _
(BEYER)........SMITH....... (BAKER)..........MZLLER...... _
(NIEDER).......STANTON.....✓ (BEVERAGE)......PMOR RR......
(NELSON).......SUTTON......JG _ _ (SCOTT).....:—.NEAL........
(SUTTON).........NELSON.....
DISTRICT 3 (LACAYO).........PARTIN......
(CULVER).........PERRY....... _
(LACRYO).......PgRfIN......JL (COX)........ ....PLUMMER..... _
(NELSON).......POLIS ......JL, (NELSONI.........POLlS.......Jc
(MANDIC).......BAILEY......JG illBBBRi*w+w+++YiW4r.......
(NORBY)........CATLIN......JL (OVERHOLT).......ROTH........JL
(RISNER).......CLIFT.......JG (PACE)...........SAPIEN......JC
(PERRY)........CULVER......JG (WILES)..........SIEFEN......JL
(REESE)........GRIFFIN..... (BEYER)..........SMITH.......JL
(LUXEMBOURCER).OR
IS ET...... (WIEDER).........STANTON.....JC
(NEDEL)........MAHONEY.....}G (NELSON).........SUTTON..........
(SCOTT)........NEAL......... (MILLER).........SWA N........�6
(SUTTON).......NELSON...... (SELVAGOI).......SYLVIA......-&L
(OVERHOLT).....ROTH........ (FINLEY).........THOMAS......JC
(PACE).........SAPIEN....... (GREEN)..........HAMMER......JC
(WILES)........SIEFEN......
(WIEDERI.......STANTON..... _
(SELVAGGI)....•SYLVIA......JG
DISTRICT 5 STAFF, SYLVE3TER...Je
CLARKE......
(COX)..........HART......... DAWES.......
(COX)..........MAURER....... ANDERSON....JC
(WIEDER).......STANTON.....JC BU TLER......JC
BROWN.......JL
DISTRICT 6 BAKER.......
( KYLE........JC
.... .....y YIN LANGEN _IL
(COX)..........PLUMMER..... WINSOR......Jge
(NIEDER).......STANTON.....JC STREED......J CLAWSO C
CLANSO N.....
DISTRICT 7 IOTEN.......
CINDER......
((BAKER)........MILLER...... �
BAKER)........MILLER...... a a.L. A.WW
(COX)..........MAURER......JL
((BEYER)........SMITH........ OTHERS; WOODRUFF ATKINS......_1e!
BEYER)........STANTON.....JC ATKINS......
(NIEDER).......STANTON..... ✓ HOW .....
(GREEN)........WAMNER...... HARD......-r
NUNT. ......��
DISTRICT 11 HE
IT..ITM......._
K
(HANDIC).......BAlLEY...... G N OP F.........
(NIEDER .......STANTON....,�C LENOLANCM.
STO
(FINLE •.THOMAS......_��_V LYNCH......._
MARTINSON...=
DISTRICT 13 PEARCE......
WASON......._
(NELSON).......SUTTON......JG YOUNG.......��
(MURPHY)..,,,,,BEVERAGE....JC ^
(OVERHOLT).....ROTH........ �A+C
(BEYER)........SMITM.......�
(WIEDER).......STANTON......L
Wei DISTRICT 14 �`C�yA- QYXav�nASX. �LA•o�Y�/1
(BAKER)........MILLER......�J
(MILLER).......SWAN........_� e..,..
(SALTARELLI)...KENNEDY..... /
(BEYER)........SMITH.........
(WIEDER).......S TANTON.....
07/09/86
July 9, 1986 - Joint Board Meeting
v PLEASE SIGN IN _
Name Company/Agency
PfJv�OVIL A-nv\r"- t�avowv Gr u�C Ca�C�ur
�L(, FLEjVItN(r gamiIJ /dNq CA440w6zc_
l rdGy l�ue� -7�4 de .A. E..�
6?a ,, c s Oo c,
p c 5p
vew
DesU
—
Joitn L.iwcJE/' CS��G_
COacz y2,,st=- �
JULY 9, 1986 JOINT MEETING NOTES
#7(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman
SEE ATTACHED REPORT.
Chairmen Griffin added re item (1), it is important for all of the Directors to
inform the citizens of what the Districts are doing and what need to get done.
He suggested that the Directors keep the package in their meeting folders and
use the material for discussions with others in order to be an informed
representative of the Districts.
#7(b) - Report of the General Manager
The General Manager stated he Mould like to follow-up on a couple items. With
regard to the deep ocean sludge research project, he referred to the summary of
the project mailed with the agenda material. He advised that if any Directors
had any questions, they should call him or Blake Anderson and they Mould be
happy to discuss it with them.
He added that in addition to the information with the Executive Crnmittee
Report, a bulletin had been received late that afternoon from the Department of
Health Services re Stringfellow and was included in the Directors' folders.
With regard to the Clean Water Act, there is still no action on that. Congress
is in recess for July 9th and will be back this week. It is still in the
Conference Committee. There is speculation whether they will even get a bill
out this year.
#7(c) - Report of the General Counsel
Tom hbodruff reported on three items of litigation. One was regarding a Stop
Notice on a construction job and the Districts really aren't involved. The
second lawsuit was filed by Operations and Maintenance employees representative
union against Districts re action against an employee. The suit has been
disposed of and employee has resigned. The third case is a cross complaint. We
filed a temporary injunction order and then a permanent injunction against
Aerotech, and they have filed an action that we have wrongfully sued them. Said
he didn't think their case had any merit at all.
#8 - Election of Joint Chairmen
Opened nominations and noted that Dom Griffin had been nominated at the June
Board Meeting. It was moved that nominations be closed. Don Griffin re-elected
Joint Chairmen. Mr. Griffin then stated that he appreciated the important work
that the Districts do and said he would be pleased to continue to work with the
Directors for another year and, hopefully, will make a little dent in the
important jobs. Thanked staff for their help and Chairman of the Districts and
of the various committees. Also thanked Vice Chairman Don Smith for being his
right-hard man.
#9 - Election of Vice Joint Chairman
Opened nomdnations. Don Smith nominated. Moved nominations be closed.
Don Smith re-elected Vice Joint Chairman. Fie stated that he would support the
Joint Chairman as much as he could.
#13 - SAIC Amendment re Spec. No. 5-032
Director Bart asked if there was an opportunity for Directors to go out on the
boat with this firm and observe the testing? Blake Anderson said he would have
to check to see if there was any problem with regard to their insurance
coverage. Don Griffin added that SAIC gave a slide presentation and verbal
report at the Selection Comittee meeting that was extremely informative. He
said he had asked staff and SAIC if they would put together a presentation for
the Joint Boards within the next three months—maybe in September.
Director Sutton also asked if the Santa Monica Bay study would have any impact
on our Districts? He was told that they do not have anything to do with
monitoring here but it does have something to do with SOZMP. Does have some
potential rub-off re our efforts.
#15 - DISTRICTS 1 5 14 re long-term debt financing program
The General Manager recognized Bill Butler who has been working quite hard,
along with the consultants, for the past several weeks to provide the Directors
with information requested.
Chairman pro tom Buck stated that Districts 2 and 3 had received the information
they needed before and wondered if they needed to hear the same report again.
Joint Chairman asked for a brief summary from staff and consultants.
Bill Butler stated that Districts 2 and 3 reached a decision at a previous
adjourned meeting and Districts 5 and 6 just met prior to this meeting and
reached a decision also. Need final determinations from Districts 1 and 14.
District 1 - Chairman Hoesterey moved to proceed. Motion seconded and carried
unanimously.
District 14 - Director Swan stated that District 14 will withdraw from this bond
issue as they have made other arrangements.
Lora Stovall from Bartle Wells briefly reviewed the Preliminary Official
Statement they would be preparing which contains disclosure information and is a
marketing document to get investors and underwriters interested in the
Districts' bonds. It will be sent to about 500 underwriting offices around the
country.
Fd Long from the bond counsel's office mentioned that there are four basic
documents to be approved by the Boards including Acquisition and Omstruction
Agreement for Joint Facilities, an Assignment Agreement, a Trust Agreement, and
a Notice Inviting Bids. These provide the procedure for sale of certificates.
The resolution to be approved authorizes the Chairman to approve changes to
documents as they are being finalize]. The resolutions will authorize the
Chairman to accept a bid within parameters between 88 interest and 48 discount.
Tom Woodruff commented re item 15(d)(3) - Resolution No. 86-84. He said the
resolution specifically authorizes and delegates authority for the Chairmen to
take all of the necessary steps and execute the documents. The reason for that
is that in the course of the transactions, the documents nay need to be filed
prior to the July 30th meeting, or if they don't have a quorum at the
meeting, the Chairmen would still be authorized to execute the documents. It
only authorizes the Chairmen to do what has been approved by the Ditricts. If
execution is not required prior to July 30th, the Boards will act at that time.
-2-
Approximate amount of issue:
District 1 approved Resolution No. 86-84-1 $ 25 million
District 2 approved Resolution No. 86-84-2 44.5 million
District 3 approved Resolution No. 86-84-3 48 million.
(Director Ruth Bailey voted no)
#16 - Budgets
Director Wahner stated he would like a clarification with regard to increasing
connection fees before they adopt their budget in District 6.
The General Manager explained that there are two separate budget documents
included in the agenda package. The dark blue cover does not include provision
for debt financing and would be considered by Districts 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14.
The light blue cover is for Districts proceeding with issuing long-term debt
financing which would be Districts 1, 2 and 3.
Mr. Sylvester referred to the summary and staff transmittal letter which is the
first page of the budget book. Staff snmunarized and compared the proposed
budget with 1985-86 showing the increase and percent of budget. He stated that
as a practical matter, the Board has already considered and previously approved
four or five categories of the expenditure requirements at the June nreetinng when
they approved the Joint Operating Budget of $30.5 mullion. The collection
system and other District operations and maintenance costs which represent
individual District costs of operating and maintaining their collection system
of trunk sewers and pumping stations ware the portions of the budget before the
Directors that night. The total for the nine Districts is $4.1 million. The
total treatment plant construction appropriation is $50.1 million which was also
approved at the June meeting with the CORE budget. The Directors previously
�..i considered the Districts' trunk sewer construction program when they approved
the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for each District. This budget merely reflects
the schedule placed into effect by adoption of that program. The Districts
construct in accordance with the Master Plan.
Debt service to date reflects bond issues in 1951, 1958, 1962 and 1970. The
budget is really driven by construction reserves on the income side. 68% from
carry-over and reserves. The tax allocation, which is our share of the 18
allocation under the Proposition 13 fornula, is about 88 of the budget. Bond
redemption is less than 1%. Construction grants have tapered way off. The
$2.4 mullion is merely the balance of payments pending a financial audit. Have
connection fees and supplemental user fee charges. Districts 1, 5, 6, & 13 are
financed by user fees at the present time. District 1 - $26/yr. District 5 -
$26/yr. District 6 - $29/yr and District 13 - $70/yr. (no ad valorem tax in
District 13).
Mr. Sylvester reviewed the pie charts on the budget. On the expenditure side
about 78% is for construction. Actual construction and reserves are about 2/3
of the total budget. Asked for questions. There were none.
Re District 3, Director Partin couented that even with bonding, it appeared
that they should institute sare type of user fees by 1987-88 to stay ahead of
the game. The General Manager advised that the cash flow projection shows when
you take into consideration the following year's dry period of reserves, would
consider, based on conservative projections, that there would not be a
.i regairemnt to implement a fee until the following year at the soonest. The
staff will be preparing a complete report for District 3's consideration later
in the year.
-3-
Chairman Wahner then asked that District 6's budget approval be removed from the
agenda. Mr. Sylvester asked if the Board's request to not consider the budget
that evening was pending a report on increasing their fees. The Chairmen asked
if the Board approves the budget at this time, could they be able to increase
the fees later? Mr. Sylvester advised that if they adopt the budget, it would
not preclude changing the fees at any time. He recommended approving the
budget and directing staff to report back re connection fee schedule.
Mr. Wahner withdrew his request to remove District 6's budget approval from the
agenda.
$18 - FPC recommendations re liability insurance
Director Hoesterey, Chairman of the FPC, reported that the FPC had met twice to
decide how to handle the Districts' insurance for the upcoming year. At the
first meeting, they decided to extend the current coverage until July 15th.
Looked at options made available to Districts: (1) Go with insurance on an
occurrence basis and for $975,000 for each occurrence plus $152,000 premium with
$450,000 deductible and $25,000 per occurrence fee, would total $675,000 for
$975,000 coverage. (2) $1 million per occurrence with $1 million deductible for
$75,000 per year. Did not reccaved those two. He said the FPC felt that we
are at a point where we can afford to self insure the Districts. Have $651,000
of reserve available to us right now. If we take what is budgeted for insurance
premium ($258,000), can start out with $909,000 in reserve. If we continue to
pay premiums to ourselves, can handle any claim that would come against the
agency. Should we have a large claim, it would be 3-5 years before it was paid,
so reserve could handle it. If it is a catastrophic claim, could use capital
reserves to pay any debt.
He then reviewed the four action items recommended by the FPC. Tom Woodruff
reported that he had prepared a pooling agreement. Part of the Operating
Budget for the joint Districts includes payment of a premium. In the past it
was paid to insurance conies in proportion to respective District ownership
in joint facilities. This pooling program they have developed provides that
each District annually will budget a sun of money to coves the projected losses
and expenses for one year. At the tine any claim is made against the Districts,
the expenses and losses will be paid out of the pool of revenues that have been
contributed proportionally by all of the Districts. That would be true whether
it is a joint claim or in the area of me individual District. In the event
there is no money left and the reserve is exhausted, then each District will
replenish the fund in the same proportion as they contribute to the joint works
budget.
Director Polis asked about the differences between bearer and self-insurance.
Tom Woodruff stated that the agency is still insured and none of the Directors
will be any more liable. He added that he did a mem a couple months ago
indicating that under the statutes of the State of California, the Districts are
obligated to defend each Director and pay any judgment against any Director. He
assured Directors that in the perforance of their duties, they are insured and
guranteed of the Districts' resources behind them.
Don Smith indicated that the City of Orange was the first me that went self
insured in Orange County. They adopted a resolution that they would support
employees the same as in the past. Tan Woodruff said he hadn't heard of any
concerns from staff. Indicated in Department Head meeting and passed down
through employee ranks that the Districts are obliged to defend any employee in
the course of his employment. Said he has addressed this issue a lot of times
and. it is a rightful concern on the part of the Directors. Really believed that
�.✓ elected officials have very minimal exposure.
-4-
Director Buck asked if in recent years our liability has been fairly well spread
around. Tom Abodruff replied we are very hamgeneous in our claim. h@ refuse
to pay claims for sewer backups. There are exceptions but our losses are
negligible. Our vehicle operation is our major exposure. Cn our construction
. projects we get insurance from contractors naming us as additional insureds.
�./ Director Siefen reiterated that this year we are going to take out what we have
budgeted for insurance and will do this each year. Should the fund get to the
point where it is more than it is reasonable, than I assume that the premiums
will drop off, right? Was answered, yes, will be reporting to Directors each
year what the balances are when the budgets are done.
Called for the question. Approved four ,actions listed on attached tan report.
Dick Edgar camiented that he thought the Sanitation Districts along with the
cities, half of which are self-insured, have an opportunity to maybe have a
larger orange County pool. Should be thinking about this and mybe talk to each
other about it in the future.
as
-5-
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
JULY 9, 1986
1 ) PROPOSED DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL RESEARCH PROJECT.
AS YOU KNOW, FOR MANY YEARS THE DISTRICTS HAVE BEEN WORKING
ON A PROPOSED RESEARCH PROJECT TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTS OF
DISCHARGING PRECONDITIONED SLUDGE IN THE DEEP OCEAN OFF OUR
COASTLINE. RECENTLY THIS PROPOSAL HAS RECEIVED CONSIDERABLE
MEDIA ATTENTION. UNFORTUNATELY, THE ACCOUNTS IN THE LOCAL PRESS
HAVE NOT GIVEN AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSAL AND, IN
FACT, HAVE BEEN MISLEADING.
I BELIEVE THIS MISINFORMATION IS A REAL DISSERVICE TO THE
PUBLIC AND I HOPE TO MEET WITH THE EDITOR OF THE DAILY PILOT TO
DISCUSS THE MERITS OF THE PROGRAM AND ASK THAT THEY DO AN .
OBJECTIVE FOLLOW-UP ARTICLE.
2) STRINGFELLOW LONG-RANGE REMEDIAL PROGRAM
.J INCLUDED WITH YOUR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORT IN THIS
EVENING' S AGENDA PACKAGE IS INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE
STUDY OF LONG-RANGE ALTERNATIVES FOR CLEAN-UP OF THE STRINGFELLOW
SITE.
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE HAD DIRECTED THE STAFF TO REQUEST A
SPECIAL BRIEFING FOR THE BOARDS BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
SERVICES ON A NIGHT OTHER THAN THE REGULAR MEETING, AND DOHS HAS
SUGGESTED THE FOLLOWING ALTERNATIVES:
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20TH
OR
THURSDAY, AUGUST 21ST
`--WWEDNESDAY, AUGUST 27TH� Z.w /
POLL DIRECTORS TO FIND OUT IF ANY OF THESE ARE CONVENIENT
DATES.
-1-
3) PRESENTATION OF PLAQUES
A. DON ROTH, CHAIRMAN OF DISTRICT NO. 3
JULY. 1984 - MAY. 1986
(ASK DON ROTH TO COME FORWARD TO ACCEPT A PLAQUE FROM THE
BOARDS IN APPRECIATION FOR DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE AS
CHAIRMAN OF DISTRICT NO. 3 FROM JULY, 1984 THROUGH MAY, 1986)
B. EDWARD R. "TED" FRANCIS - 25 YEAR SERVICE PLAQUE
(ASK DISTRICT EMPLOYEE TED FRANCIS TO STEP FORWARD AND
RECEIVE A SERVICE AWARD IN RECOGNITION OF 25 YEARS OF
FAITHFUL SERVICE TO THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS)
MR. FRANCIS IS A PRINCIPAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE IN OUR
. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. HIS PRIMARY JOB IS TO ASSURE THAT THE
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN CONSTRUCTION OF NEW FACILITIES AT THE
TREATMENT PLANT SITES ARE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS.
4) FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT.
DIRECTOR DAN GRISET HAS STEPPED DOWN FROM THE FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE AND I WOULD LIKE TO APPOINT DIRECTOR JOHN SUTTON TO
FILL THE VACANCY ON THE COMMITTEE.
I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THOSE DIRECTORS THAT HAVE EXPRESSED
INTEREST AND VOLUNTEERED TO SERVE NOT ONLY ON THE FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE , BUT ON OTHER COMMITTEES AS WELL.
THE COMMITTEES PUT IN A LOT OF HARD WORK AND LONG HOURS IN
THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNMENTS WHICH I SINCERELY APPRECIATE.
-2-
5) UPCOMING MEETINGS
^ A. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE REGULAR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
MEETING DATE IS JULY 23RD. HOWEVER, STAFF HAS JUST
LEARNED THAT MANY OF THE DIRECTORS WILL BE ATTENDING
THE CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF CITIES MEETING IN MONTEREY
THAT WEEK. I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT THE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING BE HELD THE FOLLOWING
v°
WEDNESDAY, JULY 3.0. AT ' M. INSTEAD.
INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND:
MIKE BEND CHARD BUCK
OR
FRANK CLIFT OR NORMAN CULVER
B. DISTRICTS 1 ,2, 33,E 6 14 WILL BE CONSIDERING LATER
THIS EVENING UNDER AGENDA ITEM N0. 15 WHETHER TO
PROCEED WITH ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF
.✓
PRRTICIPATION FOR PARTIRLLY FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF
SEWERAGE FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS.
FOR THOSE DISTRICTS ELECTING TO PROCEED, WE HAVE
TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED AN ADJOURNED MEETING AT 7:30
P.M. ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, TO TAKE THE APPROPRIATE
FINAL ACTIONS.
THE DIRECTORS WILL CONSIDER ADJOURNMENT AS PART OF
AGENDA ITEM 150) (4) .
-3-
Detailed discussions of each of these alternatives are presented in the report
entitled: PRELIMINARY REPORT - EVALUATION OF DISTRICTS' LIABILITY INSURANCE
ALTERNATIVES, which was previously mailed to Directors with the agenda material
for the July 9, 1986 meeting of the Joint Boards.
RECOMMENDATIONS
After careful consideration of the alternatives as set forth in the above
referenced preliminary report, and given the limited coverage available at
substantially increased costs, it is the recommendation of the Fiscal Policy
Committee that the Joint Districts discontinue liability insurance and convert
to a fully self-funded program effective July 15, 1986.
A fully self-funded liability program is feasible only if the Joint Districts
agree to share the costs on the same basis as other joint costs are shared which
is based on each District's flow. Accordingly, the Committee has directed the
General Counsel to prepare an interdistrict agreement setting forth such an
agreement for consideration by the Directors.
If the Districts' Boards concur with the Committee's recommendations, the
following actions would be appropriate:
1. Consideration of motion directing staff and the General Counsel to
develop and implement a fully self-funded insurance program for the
Districts' public liability risk management program effective July 15,
1986.
2. Consideration of Resolution No, approving an interdistrict
agreement setting forth the terms and conditions for collective
risk-sharing and premium contributions to support a fully self-funded
public liability program (see attached) .
3. Consideration of motion directing staff to transfer 1986-87 budgeted
liability insurance premium contributions into the Public Liability
Self-Insured Fund reserve account (estimated 1986-87 contributions:
$258,000) .
4. Consideration of motion directing staff and general counsel to continue
to explore all potentially reasonable alternatives for providing future
excess public liability insurance coverage for review and evaluation by
the Fiscal Policy Committee.
Ronald B. Roesterey, Chairman
Don R. Griffin
Carol Eawanami
Philip Maurer
James Neal -
James Wahner
-2-
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 22 3, 5, 61 72 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
a
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
JULY 9, 1986
PAlTATloM
� a 9 `wpouiaa o, oiy,
Siaea 1954
oAgq'GE COVN�
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
108144 ELLI3 AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VAL= CALIFORNIA
u
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, vas held on July 9, 1986, at 7:30 p.m., it
the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the
roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 as follows:
as 7
AC[IVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x Ronald-B. Hoeeterey, Chairman _Donald J. Saltarelli
—a—Robert Hanson, Chairman pro tea or. Crank
: Den Driest Robert Luxembourger
z Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder
DISTRICT NO. 2: • Buck Catlin, Chairman _Chris Herby
x Richard Buck, Chairman pro tea _George Ziegler
x Dan Griset _Robert Luxembourger
ix Carol Kavanami _Wayne Silz al
William D. Mahoney Dorothy Wedel
J. Todd Murphy _Michael J. Beverage
s x Janes Heal _George Scott
x Bob Perry _Norman Culver
x Don Roth E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr.
- x Don Smith Ccve Beyer
x Roger greatov _Harriett Wieder
a John H. Sutton _Caney Ralson
DISTRICT NO. 3: a Richard Partin, Chairman _Otto J. Lacayo
x Richard Pulls, Chairman pro tem _Reich Nelson
z Huth Bailey _Ruth Finley
x Bunk Catlin _Chris Herby
m Frank Clift _Joyce Sister
z Norman Culver _Bob Perry
—x-Don Griffin _Lester Seeae
_Dsn Griset Robert Luxembourger
x William D. Mahoney _Dorothy Wedel
z James Real _George Scott
x Carrey Nelson, _John H. Sutton
`7 _1.__Don Roth, H. Llewellyn Overholt
_1.__Sal Sapien _Mike Pace
"Bob" Siefev _Dewey Wiles
x Roger Stanton Harriett Winder
_1.__Charles Sylvia _Anthony Selvaggi
DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman _John Co., Jr.
x Philip Meurer, Chairman pro can John Co., Jr.
_Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder
DISTRICT NO. 6: =James Weber , Chairman _
i Ruthelyn Planner, Chairman pro ten John Co., Jr.
.A.__Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder
DISTRICT NO. 7: z Richard Edgar, Chairman _Donald J. Saltarelli
-7—Sally Anne Miller, Chairman pro tem _Dave Baker
—x--Da. Griset Robert Luxembourger
x Philip Maurer _John Co., Jr.
x Don Smith _Gets Beyer
—7—Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder
x James Wehver _Barry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Ruth Bailey, Chairman _Ruth Finley
_1.__Roger Stanton, Chairman pro ten Harriett Wieder
x John Thomas _Ruth Finley
DISTRICT NO. 13: z John H. Sutton, Chairman _Carrey Nelson
• Michael J. Beverage, Chairman pro ten J. Todd Murphy
x Don Roth —H. Llewellyn Overholt
x Don Smith Gene Beyer
_Roger Stanton _Harriet Wieder
DISTRICT NO. 14: a Sally Anne Miller, Chairman _Dave Baker
x--Peer A. Sven, Chairman pro ten Darryl Miller
—x—Ursula Kennedy _Dooald J. Saltarelli
s Don Smith Geae Beyer
z ReRer Stanton _Harriett Wieder
-2-
07/09/86
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita
Brown, Board Secretary, William N. Clarke,
Thomas M. Dawes, Blake Anderson, Bill
Butler, Penny Kyle, Hilary Baker, Gary
Streed, Rich von Langan, Chuck Winsor,
Corinne Clawson, Bob Ooten, John Linder,
Mike Deblieux, Ted Francis, Judy Bucher, Al
Ureic, Thomas V. Gerlinger
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Suzanne Atkins, Conrad Hohener, Jr., Ron
Young, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf, Al Baker,
Pervaiz Anwar, Bill Fleming, Frank
Cougland, Lora Stovall, Ed Long
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: >
Receive, file and accept resigna-
tion of Mayor James Beam of the That the letter from Mayor James Beam
City of Orange and seating first resigning from the Board of Directors of
and second alternates to the Mayor District No. 14, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be
seated as members of the Boards:
District First Alternate Second Alternate
14 Don E. Smith Gene Beyer 1 I
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
June 11, 1986, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held June 11, 1986, or the adjourned
meeting held June 18, 1986, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments `
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held June 11, 1986, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved as mailed. The Chairman further ordered
that the minutes of the adjourned meeting held June 18, 1986, be deemed approved,
as corrected, to reflect the attendance of Director Polis.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
June 11, 1986, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held 1 '
June 11, 1986, the Chairman ordered that �ar�
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-3-
07/09/86
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
June 11, 1986, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
June 11, 1986, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
June 11, 1986, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
June 11, 1986, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Griffin reported that
Report of the Joint Chairman for many years the Districts have been
working on a proposed research project
to evaluate the effects of discharging preconditioned sludge deep into the ocean off
our coastline. He advised that this proposal had recently received considerable
media attention which, unfortunately, was inaccurate and misleading. Mr. Griffin
referred Directors to a summary of the proposed project included with the Directors'
agenda material providing the facts of the proposal for use by the Directors.
The Joint Chairman announced that the Executive Committee was recommending an
adjourned Joint Board Meeting in August for a briefing by the State Department of
Health Services relative to the status of the Stringfellow long-range remedial
alternatives study. Following a poll of the Directors it was decided that the
meeting would be scheduled for Wednesday, August 27, 1986 at 7:00 p.m.
Chairman Griffin called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday,
July 30th, at 5:30 p.m., and invited Directors Mike Beverage and Richard Buck to
attend and participate in the discussions. He noted that this was a change from
the regularly-scheduled date of July 23rd due to a conflict with a California
League of Cities' meeting in Monterey which several of the Directors would be
attending.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized outgoing
Presentation of plaque to Chairman Don R. Roth for his efforts and
outgoing Chairman Roth dedication to Districts' activities
during his term as Chairman of District
No. 2 from July 1984 to May 1986. He then presented a plaque expressing the
Boards appreciation to past Chairman Roth.
ALL DISTRICTS Chairman Griffin recognized Mr. Edward
Presentation of 25-year service R. "Ted" Francis, Districts' Principal
plaque to District employee Engineering Associate, for 25 years of
faithful service to the Sanitation
Districts.
`/ -4-
07/09/86
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the
Appointment to Fiscal Policy appointment of Director John Sutton to
Committee fill the vacancy on the Fiscal Policy
Committee created by Director Dan
Griset's resignation from said committee.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented further on
Report of the General Manager the staff summary referred to by the
Joint Chairman on the Districts'
proposed deep ocean sludge disposal research project. He asked Directors' to
contact staff if they had any questions or desired additional information.
With regard to the report of the Executive Committee relative to the status of
the Stringfellow Remedial Investigation/Feasibility, he noted that a bulletin on
the project published by the State Department of Health Services had been
received that afternoon and had been placed in the Directors' agenda folders.
Mr. Sylvester also reported on the status of legislation to reauthorize the
Federal Clean Water Act. Consideration by the joint House/Senate Conference
Committee is stalled because of priorities of other legislation. There is some
speculation whether or not they will get a bill out this year.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly commented on
Report of the General Counsel the status of three matters of
litigation involving the Districts
relative to a Stop Notice on Districts Nos. 7 and 14 sewer construction project; a
disciplinary action lawsuit brought by an employee who has since resigned; and a
cross-complaint filed by an industrial firm against which the Districts have
issued an injunction for dumping illegal concentrations of chemical solutions into
the sewer system.
ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by
Annual Election of Joint Chairman the Boards of Directors for the election
of the Chairman of the Joint
Administrative Organization, the Secretary stated that Director Don R. Griffin had
been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 11, 1986, in
accordance with established procedures.
There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the
unanimous ballot for Director Don R. Griffin as Joint Chairman of the Joint
Administrative Organization.
Joint Chairman Griffin then thanked the Board members for their vote of
confidence and support in the past and pledged to work closely with the Directors
and do his very best to provide leadership and to carry on the Districts'
tradition of excellence. He also expressed his appreciation to Vice Joint
Chairman Don Smith, to the Chairmen of each District and the various special
committees for all of their help and generous service during the past year.
ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by
Annual election of Vice Joint the Boards for election of the Vice
Chairman Chairman of the Joint Administrative
Organization, the Joint Chairman then
called for nominations for the poet, whereupon Director Don E. Smith was
nominated.
-5-
07/09/86
There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled, and the Secretary
cast the unanimous ballot for Director Don E. Smith as Vice Chairman of the Joint
Administrative Organization.
�.� Vice Joint Chairman Smith then thanked the Directors for electing him to the poet
and pledged to continue to do his utmost for the Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages "A" and
"B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be,
and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
6/11/86 6/25/86
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 337,580.82 $ 809,393.98
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 256,403.79 159,929.59
Joint Working Capital Fund - 81,552.21 206,658.21
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 8,209.76 10,145.34
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,000.75 1,382.35
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 32,841.61 7,712.43
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 1$388.64 41,440.56
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 1,306.81 7,400.76
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 492.39
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 86,626.91 4,300.72
DISTRICT NO. 11 60.03 14,277.45
DISTRICT NO. 13 -0- -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 -0- -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 6 6 JOINT - 18.35 7,232.29
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 3,693.81 32.89
$ 810,683.49 $1,270,398.96
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing and directing execution
and filing of documents necessary That the following resolutions
for Federal and State Grants for authorizing and directing execution and
the 1986-87 Joint Works Improve- filing of documents necessary for
ments and Additions Federal Grants under 33 U.S.C. , 12551 at
seq. and State Grants under Clean Water
Bond Laws for the 1986/87 Joint Works Improvements and Additions, be, and are
hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors.
District No. Resolution No.
1 86-63-1
2 86-64-2
3 86-65-3
5 86-66-5
6 86-67-6
7 86-68-7
11 86-69-11
13 86-70-13
14 86-71-14
-6-
07/09/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications
re Job No. P1-23R That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 86-72, approving
plane and specifications for Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-23R, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications
re Job No. P2-30 That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 86-73, approving
plane and specifications for Rehabilitation of Domes and Installation of Sludge
Pump Mixing Systems for Digesters "E" and "N" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-30, and
authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A
certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
Job No. P1-21 specifications for Installation of
Replacement of Centrifuges with Belt
Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-21, authorizing an addition of
$28,417.63 to the contract with Margate Construction Company for rerouting of
drainlines, installation of a temporary digester drainline, and installation of an
additional sludgeline; and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for said
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
Job No. PI-24R specifications for Rehabilitation of
Basins 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job
No. Pl-24R, authorizing an addition of $87,861.00 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc., to furnish and install two new scum troughs, coat all ferrous
metals with polyurethane, remove and replace mercury vapor lighting fixtures with
more efficient holophane high pressure sodium lighting fixtures, and installation
of three District-furnished launder valves, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 4 to the
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and -
Job No. P2-28-1 specifications for Installation of
Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-28-1, authorizing an addition of $3,405.00 to the contract with
Ziebarth 6 Alper for demolition and repiping of vent lines and replacement of high
pressure air line, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
Job No. P2-29 specifications for Rehabilitation of
Basins "D" and "E" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-29, authorizing an addition of $79,779.35 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Inc. , to coat all ferrous metals on both basins with polyurethane,
and remove and replace all mercury vapor lighting fixtures with more efficient
holophane high pressure sodium lighting fixtures, be, and is hereby, approved.
-7-
07/09/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with Pulaski and Arita, That the Selection Committee
Architects Incorporated re certification of the final negotiated
preparation of Master Plan of fee with Pulaski and Arita, Architects
Support Facilities, Site and Incorporated for preparation of Master
Security Improvements at Treatment Plan of Support Facilities, Site and
Plant No. 2 Security Improvements at Treatment Plant
No. 2, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 86-74,
approving Professional Services Agreement with Pulaski and Arita, Architects
Incorporated for preparation of Master Plan of Support Facilities, Site and
Security Improvements at Treatment Plant No. 2, on an hourly-rate basis including
' overhead and profit plus direct expenses, for a total amount not to exceed
$30,500.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Engineering Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee
Corporation re design of certification of the final negotiated
Job No. P1-27 fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation
for design of Entrances, Site, Security
and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 86-76,
approving the Engineering Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation
\.✓ for design of Entrances, Site, Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-27, on an hourly-rate basis including overhead, plus direct
expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $60,159.00. A
certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Engineering Services
Agreement with Brown and Caldwell That the Selection Committee
Consulting Engineers re design of certification of the final negotiated
Job No. J-19 fee with Brown and Caldwell Consulting
' Engineers for design of Central Power
Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 86-77,
approving the Engineering Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting
Engineers for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, on an
hourly-rate basis, plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed
profit, for a total amount not to exceed $252,958.00. A certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the
Engineering Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee
John Carollo Engineers re Job certification of the final negotiated
No. P1-22 and Job No. J-6-2 fee re Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering
Services Agreement with John Carollo
-8-
07/09/86
Engineers re design of Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-22, and Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2,
for design of an extension of the "backbone" electrical distribution system to
serve the proposed administration building addition and other support facilities
at Plant No. 1, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, t�
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 86-78,
approving Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers re design of Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-22, and Electrical Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2,
for design of an extension of the "backbone" electrical distribution system to
serve the proposed administration building addition and other support facilities
at Plant No. 1, on an hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead, plus
profit, for a total amount not to exceed $26,010.00, increasing the total maximum
compensation from $502,330.00 to an amount not to exceed $528,340.00. A
certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the
Engineering Services Agreement That the Selection Committee
with John Carollo Engineers re certification of the final negotiated
Job No. J-15 fee re Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering
Services Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers for design of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15, for additional services relative to soils surveying and mapping; and for
engineering services required for shop drawing review and factory testing of the
major equipment to be prepurchased, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 86-79,
approving Addendum No. 2 to the Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers re design of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job
No. J-15, for additional services required for shop drawing review and factory
testing of the major equipment to be prepurchased, on an hourly-rate basis
including overhead, plus travel and subsistence and profit, for a total amount
not to exceed $102,156.00, increasing the total maximum compensation from
$1,971,094.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,073,250.00. A certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate Addendum No. 3 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is
Engineering Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
John Carollo Engineers re No. 3 to the Engineering Services
Job No. J-15 Agreement with John Carollo Engineers
for design of Ocean Outfall Booster
Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, for additional services required to
coordinate the design of a 69 kv electrical substation with the Southern
California Edison Company needed to service Plant No. 2.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Staff Report
re Financing Alternatives dated That the Staff Report dated July 1,
July 1. 1986 re Job No. J-15A 1986, re Financing Alternatives for
Prepurchase and Installation of Variable
Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant
No. 2, Job No. J-15A, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
-9-
07/09/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Declaring the intent to exercise
the direct purchase option for That the Boards do hereby declare that
procurement of the equipment for the direct purchase option for
Job No. J-15A as it is the most procurement of the equipment for
economical option Prepurchase and Installation of Variable
Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for
Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No, 2, Job No. J-15A, awarded to
General Electric Company at the June 11, 1986 Board meeting, is the most
economical option; and,
FURTHER MOVED; That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, directed to
advise the supplier that the Districts will exercise the direct purchase option.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications
re Job No. J-15B-2 That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 86-80, approving
plans and specifications for Vaults for Ultrasonic Flow Meter for Ocean Outfall,
Job No. J-15B-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file letter from Irvine
Ranch Water District re capacity in That the letter for Irvine Ranch Water
District No. 7's Von Karmen Trunk District dated June 17, 1986, requesting
Sewer reduction of capacity in District
No. 7's Von Rerman Trunk Sewer, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Staff Report re
calculation of District No. 14's That the Staff Report dated June 23,
and IRWD's pro-rate share of 1986, re calculation of District
capacity in the Von Kerman Trunk No. 14's and IRWD's pro-rata share of
Sewer capacity in the Von Karmen Trunk Sewer
between Michelson Drive and Main Street,
be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Amendment No. 1 to the
Agreement between County Sanitation That the Boards of Directors hereby
Districts Noe. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 adopt Resolution No. 86-92, approving
6 13 and County Sanitation District Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement between
No. 14 for Purchase and Sale of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
Capacity Rights in Treatment, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 6 13 and County
Disposal and Sewer Facilities Sanitation District No. 14 for Purchase
and Sale of Capacity Rights in
Treatment, Disposal and Sewer Facilities, modifying said agreement to provide for
a reduction of District No. 14's capacity in District No. 7's Von Barman Trunk
Sewer, Reach 2, from 5.8 MGD to 3.5 MGD. A certified copy of this resolution is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
`,i -10-
07/09/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is
Engineering Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
John Carollo Engineers re Job No. 4 to the Engineering Services v
Noe. P1-21, P2-28-1 and P2-28-2 Agreement with John Carollo Engineers
for design of Installation of
Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-21, and at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-28-1, and Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling
Facilities, Job No. P2-28-2, to provide for a change in the scope of work for
construction services.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is
Professional Services Agreement hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
with R.P. Lindstrom, Inc. re No. 2 to the Professional Services
preparation of Joint Treatment Agreement with R.P. Lindstrom, Inc., for
Works Wastewater Master Plan preparation of the Joint Treatment Works
Wastewater Master Plan, to provide for
completion of the necessary environmental work pursuant to CEQA for the support
facilities now being planned by the Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Smith-Emery That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
Company for soils and concrete to issue a purchase order to Smith-Emery
testing services Company for an amount not to exceed
$50,000.00, for soils and concrete
testing services required in connection with Districts' construction projects.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratifying action of the General
Manager in issuing Change Order That the action of the General Manager
No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 23734 in issuing Change Order No. 1 to
issued to Air Products and Purchase Order No. 23734 issued to Air
Chemicals, Inc. re Specification Products and Chemicals, Inc. for the
No. R-022 Repair of Cryogenic Turbo Expander from
the Plant No. 2 Cryogenic Pure Oxygen
Plant (Specification No. R-022) increasing the total amount from $10,000.00 to
$22,500.00, plus tax and freight, be, and is hereby, ratified.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue Change
Order No. 6 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
No. 8970 issued to White, Fine and to issue Change Order No. 6 to Purchase
Verville for assistance re legia- Order No. 8970 issued to White, Fine and
lation for sludge disposal research Verville for assistance re legislation
project for the research project for the sludge
disposal alternative, providing for an
extension of the term of said services from July 1, 1986 through December 31,
1986, and increasing the total maximum compensation from $145,000.00 to an amount
not to exceed $160,000.00.
-11- �.
07/09/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Summone and
Complaint to Enforce Stop Notice, That the Sommons and Complaint to
Amfac Distribution Corporation dba Enforce Stop Notice, Amfac Distribution
Amfac Electric Supply Company vs. Corporation dba Amfac Electric Supply
W. C. Friend, at al. , Company vs. W. C. Friend, at al., Case
Case No. 193928 re No. 193928, relative to Entry Gates at
Job No. PW-125 (Rebid) Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-125 (Rebid) be,
and is hereby, received and ordered
filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized
to appear and defend the interests of the District.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Summons and
Complaint for Damages and That the Summons and Complaint for
Injunctive Relief, International Damages and Injunctive Relief,
Union of Operating Engineers, International Union of Operating
Local 501, AFL-CIO vs. County Engineers, Local 501, AFL-CIO vs. County
Sanitation Districts of Orange Sanitation districts of Orange County,
County, Case No. 49-26-12 California, Case No. 49-26-12, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized
to appear, and to engage special counsel to appear and defend the interests of
the Districts, as necessary.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
'mow Approving Amendment No. 3 to the
Agreement with SAIC re That the Selection Committee
Specification No. 5-032 certification of the final negotiated
fee re Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement
with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), extending the existing
contract between the Districts and SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for
Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, from July 1, 1986 to
June 30, 1987, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 86-75,
approving Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement with Science Applications
International Corporation (SAIC), amending the existing contract between the
Districts and SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch
Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, to establish the fee for July 1, 1986 to
June 30, 1987, at an amount not to exceed $1,530,486.00 for the second year of
said contract. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive
Committee's meeting on June 25, 1986,
be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
`� -12-
07/09/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratifying action of Fiscal Policy
Committee in extending primary That the action of the Fiscal Policy
level Excess Liability insurance Committee in extending primary level
coverage for two weeks ($975,000.00 with deductible of
$250,000.00 plus $25,000.00 from each
claim) Excess Liability insurance coverage for two weeks from July 1, 1986 to July
15, 1986, for a premium not to exceed $12,000.00 pending further evaluation of
liability insurance alternatives, be, and is hereby, ratified, as recommended by
the Executive Committee.
ALL DISTRICTS The Chairman of the Fiscal Policy
Report and Recommendation of Committee reported on the Committee's
Fiscal Policy Committee re liabi- deliberations relative to liability
lity insurance coverage for 1986-87 insurance coverage for the Districts for
1986-87. Mr. 8oesterey indicated that
after a thorough review of the options available, the Committee is recommending
that the Districts convert to a fully self-funded liability program effective
July 15, 1986, and he reviewed the Districts' alternatives and the Committee's
written report and recommendations.
The General Counsel also reviewed the terms of an inter-District agreement for
collective risk-sharing and premium contributions to support a fully self-funded
public liability program.
Mr. Woodruff assured the Directors that their liability in the performance of
their duties as Directors, and that of District employees, would be no greater
under a self-insurance plan. The Districts are obligated by statute to defend
Directors and employees, and pay judgments against them.
Following further discussion by the Directors relative to the recommendation to
fully self-insure for liability and the provisionsof the proposed self-insurance
program, the following actions were taken:
Receive, file and approve report Moved, seconded and duly carried:
and recommendation of Fiscal Policy
Committee re fully self-insured That the report of the Fiscal Policy
liability program Committee dated July 9, 1986,
recommending that the Districts
convert to a fully self-funded public liability insurance program be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
Directing staff and the General Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Counsel to develop and implement a
fully self-funded insurance program That staff and General Counsel be,
re public liability risk management and are hereby, directed to develop
program and implement a fully self-funded
insurance program for the Districts'
public liability risk management program effective July 15, 1986, as
recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee.
-13- �/
07/09/86
Approving an interdistrict agree- Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ment providing for fully self-
funded public liability program That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 86-95,
approving an interdistrict agreement setting forth the terms and conditions
for collective risk-sharing and premium contributions to support a fully
self-funded public liability program,as recommended by the Fiscal Policy
Committee. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made
a part of these minutes.
Directing staff to transfer 1986-87 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
budgeted liability insurance
premium contributions into the That staff be, and is hereby,
Public Liability Self-Insured Fund directed to transfer 1986-87
reserve account budgeted liability insurance premium
contributions into the Public
Liability Self-Insured Fund reserve account, as recommended by the Fiscal
Policy Committee.
Directing staff and General Counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried:
to continue to explore alternatives
for providing future excess public That staff and General Counsel be,
liability insurance coverage for and are hereby, directed to continue
review and evaluation by the to explore all potentially
Fiscal Policy Committee reasonable alternatives for
providing future excess public
liability insurance coverage for review and evaluation by the Fiscal Policy
Committee,as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
�.,.� Ratifying action of Fiscal Policy
Committee in placing statutory That the action of the Fiscal Policy
Excess Workers' Compensation Committee in placing statutory Excess
insurance Workers' Compensation insurance, with
$150,000.00 self-insured retention,
effective July 1, 1986 for the annual premium of $30,634.00 be, and is hereby,
ratified, as recommended by the Executive Committee.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adopting a revised Purchasing
System and Policies and Procedures That the Boards of Directors hereby
Governing Purchases of Supplies, adopt Resolution No. 86-81, adopting a
Services and Equipment, and revised Purchasing System and Policies
Repealing Resolution Nos. 81-24 and and Procedures Governing Purchases of
82-34 Supplies, Services and Equipment, and
Repealing Resolution Nos. 81-24 and
82-34. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Electing to become subject to
Uniform Construction Cost That the Boards of Directors hereby
Accounting Procedures adopt Resolution No. 86-82, electing to
become subject to Uniform Construction
Cost Accounting Procedures set forth in Public Contracts Code of California,
Section 21100 at seq. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
-14-
07/09/86
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adopting revised Policy
Establishing Procedures for That the revised Policy Establishing
Selection of Professional Procedures for Selection of Professional
Engineering and Architectural Engineering and Architectural Services v
Services dated July 9, 1986 be, and is hereby,
adopted.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amending Classification and
Compensation Resolution No. 79-20 That the Boards of Directors hereby
re Management salary range adjust- adopt Resolution No. 86-83, amending
meets pursuant to Management Classification and Compensation
Performance Review Program Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re
Management salary range adjustments
pursuant to Management Performance Review Program. A certified copy of this
resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Staff Report on
NPDES Industrial Waste Monitoring That the Staff Report dated June 19,
Special Study 1986, on NPDES Industrial Waste
Monitoring Special Study be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Staff Report on
draft report re "Stringfellow That the Staff Report dated June 20,
Facility Remedial Investigation/ 1986, on draft report re "Stringfellow
Feasibility Study: Development and Facility Remedial 1
Initial Screening of Alternatives" Investigation/Feasibility Study:
Development and Initial Screening of
Alternatives" prepared by the State Department of Health Services, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager highlighted the
Staff Report on 1986-87 Budgets comments in the transmittal for the
individual District's 1986-87 budgets
included with the Executive Committee Report. He referenced the two budget
documents, one including provisions for long-term debt financing which should be
considered by Districts 1, 2 and 3 as they had elected to proceed with issuance
of certificates of participation, and the other excluding long-term debt
financing which should be considered by Districts 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, as they
had elected not to proceed with issuance of certificates of participation.
In response to a question from the Chairman of District No. 6, the General
Manager clarified that adoption of the 1986-87 budget by said District would not
preclude increasing their connection or use fees at any time.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried
Approving 1986-87 fiscal year by roll call vote:
budgets
That the District's 1986-87 fiscal year
budget (including long-term debt financing) be, and is hereby, approved and
adopted in the following amounts:
-15-
07/09/86
District 1
Operating Fund $ 6,707,000.00
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 10,310,000.00
�i Construction Fund 14,958,000.00
Facilities Revolving Fund 370,000.00
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1951 171,750.00
$ 32,516,750.00
FURTHER MOVED: That said budget be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried
Approving 1986-87 fiscal year by roll call vote:
budgets
That the District's 1986-87 fiscal year
budget (including long-term debt financing), be, and is hereby, approved and
adopted in the following amounts:
District 2
Operating Fund $ 22,464,000.00
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 56,927,000.00
Construction Fund 39,962,000.00
Facilities Revolving Fund 17,256,000.00
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1951 133,719.00
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1958 1,009,216.00
$137,751,935.00
FURTHER MOVED: That said budget be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried
Approving 1986-87 fiscal year by roll call vote:
budgets
That the District's 1986-87 fiscal year
budget (including long-term debt financing) be, and is hereby, approved and
adopted in the following amounts:
District 3
Operating Fund $ 18,322,000.00
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 55,118,000.00
Construction Fund 43,286,000.00
Facilities Revolving Fund 13,322,000.00
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1951 6 1958 647,840.00
$130,695,840.00
FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
`✓ -16-
07/09/86
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried
Approving 1986-87 fiscal year by roll call vote: -
budgets
That the District's 1986-87 fiscal year
budget (excluding long-term debt financing) be, and is hereby, approved and
adopted in the following amounts:
District 5
Operating Fund $ 5,044,000.00
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 15,174,000.00
Facilities Revolving Fund 1,062,000.00
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1951 51,235.00
$ 21,331,235.00
FURTHER MOVED: That said budget be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried
Approving 1986-87 fiscal year by roll call vote:
budgets
That the District's 1986-87 fiscal year
budget (excluding long-term debt financing) be, and is hereby, approved and
adopted in the following amounts:
District 6
Operating Fund $ 3,250,000.00
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 8,011,000.00
Facilities Revolving Fund 1,719,000.00
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1951 58,804.00
$ 13,038,804.00
FURTHER MOVED: That said budget be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried
Approving 1986-87 fiscal year by roll call vote:
budgets
That the District's 1986-87 fiscal year
budget (excluding long-term debt financing) be, and is hereby, approved and
adopted in the following amounts:
District 7
Operating Fund $ 6,807,000.00
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 33,258,000.00
Facilities Revolving Fund 1,678,000.00
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1951 43,294.00
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1962 988,645.00
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1970 1,344,809.00
$ 44,119,748.00
FURTHER MOVED: That said budget be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
-17-
07/09'/86
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried
Approving 1986-87 fiscal year by roll call vote:
budgets
That the District's 1986-87 fiscal year
`/ budget (excluding long-term debt financing) be, and is hereby, approved and
adopted in the following amounts:
District 11
Operating Fund $ 4,893,000.00
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 9,455,000.00
Facilities Revolving Fund 2,810,000.00
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1951 27,625.00
Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1958 91,900.00
$ 17,277,525.00
FURTHER MOVED: That said budget be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried
Approving 1986-87 fiscal year by roll call vote:
budgets
That the District's 1986-87 fiscal year
budget (excluding long-term debt financing) be, and is hereby, approved and
adopted in the following amounts:
District 13
Operating Fund $ 212,000.00
\.W1 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 5,528,000.00
Facilities Revolving Fund 935,000.00
$ 6,675,000.00
FURTHER MOVED: That said budget be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried
Approving 1986-87 fiscal year by roll call vote:
budgets
That the District's 1986-87 fiscal year
budget (excluding long-term debt financing) be, and is hereby, approved and
adopted in the following amounts:
District 14
Operating Fund $ 461,000.00
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 21,622,000.00
$ 22,083,000.00
FURTHER MOVED: That said budget be, and is hereby, received and ordred filed.
-18-
07/09/86
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 6 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Establishing the annual Gann -
appropriations limits for fiscal That the following resolutions
year 1986-87 establishing the annual Gann
appropriations limit for fiscal year
1986-87 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title
1 of the California Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective
Boards of Directors:
DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION
1 86-85-1 $1,822,590
2 86-86-2 7,578,850
3 86-87-3 9,544,745
5 86-88-5 1,962,605
6 86-89-6 1,142,439
7 86-90-7 2,280,127
11 86-91-11 2,006,087
13 --- Not Applicable
14 --- Not Applicable
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving and ratifying Employment
Agreement with Bartle Wells That the Employment Agreement with
Associates re long-term debt Bartle Wells Associates, municipal
financing program financing consultants, to assist the
participating Districts in development
and implementation of a long-term debt financing program, for the amount of
$125,000.00 for professional services, plus $50,000.00 for direct expenses, for a
total amount not to exceed $175,000.00, said costs to be shared by the Districts
electing to participate in the sale of the securities in proportion to the amount
of their respective debt issue, be, and is hereby, approved and ratified, as
recommended by the Executive Committee.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratifying an Employment Agreement
with Rourke 6 Woodruff/nudge Rose That the Employment Agreement with
Guthrie Alexander 6 Pardon as Rourke A Woodruff/Mudge Rose Guthrie
co-bond counsel re long-term debt Alexander 6 Ferdon, as co-bond counsel,
financing program to assist the participating Districts in
development and implementation of a
long-term debt financing program, for the amount of $100,000.00 for
professional services, plus $30,000.00 for direct expenses, for a total amount
not to exceed $130,000.00, said costs tos be shared by the Districts electing
to participate in the sale of the securities in proportion to the amount of
their respective debt issue, be, and is hereby, ratified, as recommended by the
Executive Committee.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue purchase
orders to Moody's Investor Services That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
and Standard and Poor's for to issue purchase orders to Moody's
establishment of a bond rating for Investor Services and Standard and
the participating Districts' Poor's, municipal bond rating agencies,
long-term debt financing issues in an amount not to exceed $30,000.00
each, for evaluation and establishment
-19-
07/09/86
of a bond rating for the participating Districts' long-term debt financing
issues, said costs to be shared by the Districts electing to participate in the
sale of the securities in proportion to the amount of their respective debt
issue, as recommended by the Executive Committee.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue purchase
order to a trustee for fiduciary That staff be, and is hereby, authorized
and bond holder registration to issue a purchase order in an amount
services re issuance of not to exceed $10,000.00 to a trustee
Certificates of Participation for fiduciary and bond holder
registration services in connection with
issuance of long-term debt by the Districts electing to issue Certificates of
Participation, said costs to be shared by the Districts electing to participate
in the sale of the securities in proportion to the amount of their respective
debt issue, as recommended by the Executive Committee.
ALL DISTRICTS The Director of Finance reviewed the
Report, discussion and actions actions taken by the other Sanitation
re long-term debt financing for Districts thus far with regard to the
funding capital construction proposed issuance of long-term debt
projects securities to partially finance master
planned construction of joint works
sewerage facilities.
At the regular meeting of June 11, 1986, Districts Nos. 3 and 11 declared their
intent not to proceed with issuance of long-term debt securities. Subsequently,
the Districts' financial consultant, Bartle Wells Associates, determined that it
would not be feasible for District No. 7 to pursue this type of financing.
`...� Districts Nos. 2 and 3, at adjourned meetings held on June 18, 1986, directed
staff, the financial consultant and bond counsel to proceed with planning for
issuance of tax-exempt Certificates of Participation on a fixed-interest rate
basis.
Districts Nos. 5 and 6, at a special meeting held immediately preceding this
Joint Board meeting, declared their intent not to proceed with issuance of
long-term debt securities. He pointed out that only Districts 1 and 14 needed to
determine whether or not to proceed with issuance of Certificates of
Participation.
Following a brief caucus by Districts 1 and 14, the following actions were taken:
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Directing staff and consultants to
proceed with issuance of long-term That the financial consultant, bond
debt financing securities to counsel and staff be, and are
partially fund capital construction hereby, directed to proceed with
projects planning and preparation of
necessary contracts, legal opinions,
official statements and related documents required to prepare for the
issuance of tax-exempt Certificates of Participation on a fixed-interest
rate basis prior to September 1, 1986, to partially fund the District's
share of joint works sewerage facilities construction.
-20
07/09/86
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Directing staff and consultants not
to proceed with issuance of long- That the financial consultant, bond
term debt financing securities for counsel and staff be, and are
funding capital construction hereby, directed not to proceed with
projects planning for issuance of long-term
debt financing to partially fund the
District's share of joint works sewerage facilities construction.
DISTRICTS 1, 2 6 3 Following brief reports by Lora Stovall
Authorizing the execution and of Bartle Wells Associates, financial
delivery of an Acquisition and consultants, and Ed Long of Mudge Rose
Construction Agreement for Joint Gruthrie Alexander 6 Pardon, and Tom
Facilities, an Assignment Agree- Woodruff, co-bond counsel, relative to
ment, a Trust Agreement and a the procedures and documents necessary
Notice Inviting Bids; Approving and to effect the proposed sale of the
Authorizing execution and delivery Certificates of Participation, and a
of an Official Statement; Approving review of the draft Official Statement,
the sale of Certificates of it was moved, seconded and duly carried:
Participation; and authorizing
certain other matters relating That the respective Boards of Directors
thereto hereby adopt the following resolutions
approving the form of and authorizing
the execution and delivery of an Acquisition and Construction Agreement for Joint
Facilities, an Assignment Agreement, a Trust Agreement and a Notice Inviting
Bids; approving and authorizing the execution and delivery of an Official
Statement; approving the sale of Certificates of Participation by a trustee in
payments made by the Districts pursuant to said Acquisition and Construction
Agreement for Joint Facilities; and authorizing certain other matters relating
thereto, as recommended by the bond counsel:
Approximate Amount of Issue
District 1 86-84-1 $25.0 Million
District 2 86-84-2 44.5 Million
District 3 86-84-3 48.0 Million
Director Ruth Bailey requested that her vote in opposition to the motion adopting
Resolution No. 86-84-3 be made a matter of record.
DISTRICTS 1, 2 6 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Declaring intent to adjourn to '
July 30, 1986 to approve documents That the Boards of Directors do hereby
in final form and award sale of declare their intent to adjourn to July
Certificates of Participation 30, 1986 at 7:30 p.m. in the Districts'
administrative office to approve
documents in final form, as set forth in Resolution No. 86-84, and to award sale
of Certificates of Participation.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratifying action of staff in
issuing a purchase order to That the action of staff in issuing a
Anaheim Sewer Construction re purchase order to Anaheim Sewer
Specification No. R-023 Construction in an amount not to exceed
$12,000.00 for Emergency Replacement of
Manhole on the Santa Ana Trunk Sewer (Specification No. R-023) be, and is hereby,
ratified.
-21-
07/09/86
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to July 30, 1986, at
�..�� 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m., July
9, 1986.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Summons and Cross-
Complaint for Damges, The People of That the Summons and Cross-Complaint for
the State of California and County Damages, The People of the State of
Sanitation District No. 2 vs. Aero California and County Sanitation
Tech Plating, Inc. ; Aero Tech District No. 2 vs. Aero Tech Plating,
Plating, Inc. vs. County Sanitation Inc. ; Aero Tech Plating, Inc. vs. County
District No. 2 and District's Chief Sanitation District No. 2 and District's
of Industrial Waste Division, Chief of Industrial Waste Division, Case
Case No. 48 11 13 No. 48 11 13, be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized
to appear and defend the interests of the District and its employees.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation No. 53
Borrow Pit Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 86-93-2, ordering
annexation of 38.79 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Nohl
Ranch Road and Santiago Boulevard in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation
No. 53 - Borrow Pit Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified
copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to July 30, 1986 at
7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. ,
July 9, 1986.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate Addendum No. 1 with That the Selection Committee be, and is
Clifford Forkert, Civil Engineer hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
re Contract No. 3-28R-1 No. 1 to the Engineering Services
Agreement with Clifford Forkert, Civil
Engineer for design of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at
Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1, for additional services relative to
preparation of modified traffic control plans for 24 of the intersections, as
requested by the affected cities.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to July 30, 1986 at
7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July
9, 1986.
`� -22-
07/09/86
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 9, 1986.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Directing the County Auditor-
Controller to include sewer service That the Board of Directors hereby
charges on property tax bill for adopts Resolution No. 86-94-6, directing
collection, pursuant to the County Auditor-Controller to include
Ordinance No. 609 sever service charges on property tax
bill for collection, pursuant to
Ordinance No. 609 of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County. A
certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: -
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m., July 9, 1986.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 4 to the
Engineering Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee
Boyle Engineering Corporation re certification of the final negotiated
Contract No. 7-7 fee re Addendum No. 4 to the Engineering
Services Agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation for design of the Main Street Pump Station, Contract
No. 7-7, for project inspection services due to Districts' staff shortages, be,
and is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 86-96-7,
approving Addendum No. 4 to the Engineering Services Agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation for design of the Main Street Pump Station, Contract
No. 7-7, for project inspection services due to Districts' staff shortages, on an
hourly-rate basis including overhead and profit, for a total amount not to exceed
$45,000.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $308,423.00 to
$353,423.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amending the Board's action
Approving Agreement with the County That the Board's action on March 12,
of Orange providing for adjustment 1986, approving Agreement with the
of manhole covers in conjunction County of Orange providing for
with County's road resurfacing adjustment of approximately 100 manhole
program covers on District sewers in conjunction
with the County's road resurfacing
program, be, and is hereby, amended to increase the total number of manholes to be
adjusted from 100 to 138 and to increase the total maximum cost of the manhole
adjustment, from an amount not to exceed $22,000.00 to an amount not to exceed
$30,360.00.
-23-
07/09/86
DISTRICT 7 It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 720 That proposed Ordinance No. 720, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 718 Establishing Separate Zones within the District and Establishing a
Schedule of Fees for Issuance of Sewer Connection Permits, and Repealing Ordinance
No. 719, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and
is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 720 by title only.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the
Adopting Ordinance No. 720 following roll call vote:
That Ordinance No. 720, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 718
Establishing Separate Zones within the District and Establishing a Schedule of
Fees for Issuance of Sever Connection Permits, and Repealing Ordinance No. 719, be
adopted:
AYES: Directors Richard Edgar, Chairman, Dan Griset, Philip Maurer,
Don E. Smith, Roger Stanton, James Wahner
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sally Anne Miller
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 9, 1986.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Engineering Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee
Corporation for Project Report on certification of the final negotiated
the Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation
for preparation of a Project Report on
the Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer, Lake Street to Goldenwest Street, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 86-97-11, approving Engineering Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation for preparation of a Project Report on the Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer,
Lake Street to Goldenwest Street, on an hourly-rate basis including overhead,
plus direct expenses and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $9,715.00. A
certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 9, 1986.
-24-
07/09/86
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 9, 1986.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then
declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 9, 1986.
Secretary, Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-25-
FUND NO ^1•^ JI 0131 YCPMINI• CAPITAL PROCFSSINF. OATF 6/05/Pf FA6E. I
PFPORT NIPPER AF13
CPONTY SANITATION OISTNICTS OF OPANDE COUNTY
I' CLAIMS PA IU 46/11/86
WARRANT NO. VFNPOP AMOUNT IIESCRIPTION
I U6.-465 A.-. IR ST CDMPP4Y $5 J.78 PUBLICATION
11 OBP4Ef ACLU-PPINT `N FOpY f5411.115 PRINTING
GBL467 LINCOLN CAFFFTS L INT[RIORS $968.00 INSTALL CARPET/PERSONNEL OFFICE
f.R.:46P 10 AP.SDN IKDUSTRIES. INC. AT.066.36 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
08E4l9 AIR CQLD SUP FLI INC. 132.54 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
066470 ALL-STAIE YF.MICLES. INC. $2.226.10 VEHICLE LEASE
080471 ALLIED ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS 1194.56.66 LAB SUPPLIES
48641? ALLIED CORFOPATION $8,171.79 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS
CUp4714 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. 1516.94 VALVES
9RL474 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCILTY $28.09 PUBLICATION
P80475 AMERICAN CYANAMID P2:.7I3.83 CATIONIC POLYMER
1 � YPG476 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH S60.UO INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
JAL477 RMEPICAK FLEET PANTS 1349.60 TRUCK PARTS
W.478 ANAHEIM BUSINESS MACHINES 5265.n0 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
46:1479 ANAIIF.IM SEVER CONSTRUCTION 110110.00 DEMOLISH SANTA ANA TRUNK.MANHOLE-DIST. I
I � P894A0 ANALABS $325.00 LAB SERVICES
{ 1 0R 1.4 PI THL ANCHOR PALMING CO. $7.704.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
�{ OP MB? AQUA BEM CORP. 169190.52 ANIONIC POLYMER
2 010403 AUTOMATED DFPURFINC SUPPLY S1.IR7.2J MELDING SUPPLIES
'"--1 O114461 UC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY. INC. $375.91 TRUCK PARTS
Cp 0405 PKK CORPOPATION $19,964.24 SLUDGE DISPOSAL
.� --d 6844R6 BPM SAFETY L SUPPLY $240.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES
/ I 96T467 KAPEN BNCMR BARFOOT $86.05 DEFERRED COMP. PAYOFF
a . O8146A CLAP SALES 1 SEPVICF.INC. $316.00 TRUCK PARTS
T 69A09 CON C. SFATTIE $181.30 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
C~ O85496 BECKMAN IKCUSTRIAL/PROCESS $1,281.30 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
981-491 PECKPAN I6CUSTNIAL CO. $44.00 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
I ; C6:492 POYLE FNf IMLI4ING CORP $31.747.51 ENGINEERING 7-7 A 7-2C•R
461-493 SRITI.WC ELECTRIC 1360.00 EMPLOYEE TRAINING/INSTRUMENTATION
9P:454 Y.C. BROOKC _ . . S84.70 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
UB 14.5 FROWN L CALOVELL 63059.00 LAB SERVICES
L64496 STEVE PUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. 150,859.44 CONTRACTOR 7-2C-4
PPL 197 PURKE ENGINFERIWG CO. $106.39 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
G14446 MILLIAM H. PUTLER 1736.36 PETTY CASH
VA- 499 CI'T CALIFORNIA. INC. $76.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1P A FUG IS COMPANY $3,565.35 VALVES
JP4 CHI CAL-RLI.SS FOR NTSLARCH9 INC. $396.12 LAB SUPPLIES
L'p F.O P2 CAL SOUTH FLUIPHF.N1 CO. f135.00 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1R'.TJ3 CAL•IMFNk CO. 149224.90 APPLY THERMAL INSULATION TO BOILERS
tPi9P4 CALTPOL . INC. f741..33 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
-F .EIS CALIFORNIA 4UPPCSSIPN SYSTCPS $225.1,4 COMPUTER REPAIR
iF1.C6 CALIF. 295T NFATING T. AIR PCNP 1`255.31 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
UR•9U7 CAkC09 INC. S445.9L TRUCK PARTS
480 SF EENTFL SY<TI'KS 11.474.-7 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
1'PSPJ9 CPE.MWEST I6DUSTNIIS. INC. f3.19711.PIl FERRIC CHLORIDE
118 LIL CHi'VROH U.S.A.. UIC. 12,994.72 GASOLINE/OIL
FORD NU 41•n JI DIRT 40R1,I0IG CAATTAL PFOCESSING 041E 6/05/A6 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AF43 I
COUNTY SAPITTATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID '16/11/Nb
II 4ApN AA.T N0. Yf.NCOF 0.NOVNT pE SfFIPTION
00 n517 lNICCIN!' SI.I C1ILIilf S, INC. f681.53 CHLORINATION EQUIPMENT '
CPL512 CO-PAS! LANDSCAff 52,551.13 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
'AL'_13 C. I.F.S. . CO. INC. 1265.90 PUMP PARTS
II ^PI'511 COPF-ESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $2.544.06 ENGINE PARTS
•I N0 CONSOLIDATED ELEC701CAL DIST. 13.661.03 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ObP511. COASOLICATEO REPROGRAPHICS f908.38 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTIONS
f PBC!17 CONTROL DATA COPP. $493.01 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
GP651B COOPER ENERGY SERVICES 61,254.32
PUMP PARTS
OA4519 COST INSTRUMENT
U70 CORP. $3$643.33 PORTABLE METER
OPRSPO COSTA MESR AV70 PARTS, INC. $293.59 TRUCK PARTS
! I ' 1, 0521 COUDIY VHCLESBWL ELCO.AfC f293.59
ELECTRICALPARTS
SUPPLIES
GBO522 CN 4PLFf P. CR04LEY CO. f903.92 „__ ,,, _ PUMP PARTS
CPO523 CAL YATCR - - 6427.^S
(' I 004624 S74TC OF CALIFORNIA 5480.00 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL
i .j PROCESS FEE/REOR6AN12AT1 ON NO. 79/DIST. 13 A 14
LR1529 STATE OF CALIFORNIA _ . _ lq T366.93. _ _ - HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ASSESSMENT
G8F526 ONE, INC. $224.7£ PUMP PARTS
L•8^.F27 DANIELS TIRE Sf RVICE $3.638.90 INDEX PARTS
EPY92A DATA IPPRESSIONS, INC. $292.30 _
X --. -. OFFICE SUPPLIES
p al S." DECO .,151.98 ELECTRICAL HYDROGEN
�0 G At 53I DEIDIESEL INSrILLD.LOGISTICS INC lI1,151.22 RELOCATE RYDROGEN PEROXIDE PUMPS 1 TACKS
r-4 4BO531 DIESEL LOGISTICS( INC. f251.22 ENGINE PARTS
fq 0BG532 DISPOSAL
CONTROL
ASSOCIATES 13,196.FB PRINTING
aboGap-33 DISPOSAL ENTERPRISES.
SF RE, INC. 115.296.00 HAZARDOUS BASTE DISPOSAL
RS
n 1 OBP434 DUNNE ENTERPRISES. INC.IM f29.014.0P EMERGENCY BASIN REPAIRS
�• OBR S,y DV NN [DYTPOS CORP. f1,E13.70
( O8"t-.6 EASTMAN, INC. $1,882.33 PAINT SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
rot-S!7 FEDERAL R EXPRESS CORP. 357.75 DELIVERY SERVICE
PBfl53P FISCHEP C POATFP CO. f357.75 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
i. 1 611405T9 FLO-SYS IC MS f1.191.RR PUMPS
0P4E40 FOUNT41K VALLEY FAINT $1,514.68 PAINT SUPPLIES
GbC541 DORALO L. FOR R ASSOCIATES $025.00- SAFETY CONSULTANTS
i. 48,542 THE FOf OPRO COMPANY a332.26
6P}593 FRANCE COMPPESSON PRODUCT f267.45 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT PARTS
48PN4 CITY OF FULLERION 515.59
I ' PP Obis TRUCK E BUS GROUP/GM 37,988.16 TNUCk USAGE
C6.!46 6 V MAINTENANCE, INC, fg9.50 PUMP PARTS
G2.^.547 CANAPL LUMPF.R CO. f2.312,07
04540 GERCPCL TELEPHONE CO. $1,346.34 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
q FCL49 GERHARDT,S, INC. $3,933.30 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES
0P:P56 PI CH AND A. GIG1. 134.12 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
ebf!5l NAM CSESEL HACMINF $335.70 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
TRUCK PARTS
0F.�5!2 NAMILTVT CLFCT AU SILLS f191.]0 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OR J!53 PIAAI. INC IMP USTRIAL fUSTIC} $126.19 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
OR 9!51 HI LTI, INC. 1126.19 TOOLS
I' )PP.555
I . OPEN CAMERA
STORES 27. CAMERA SUPPLIES
OB•!!A mISF Of DA71FHIEF $
627.07
BATTERIES
II
'� . 4
FUND NO -1'0a - JT OIST WOPKING CAIITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/0%186 PAGE I
M FPOP.7 MUMRER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISIRICTS OF OMAMOE COUNTY j
I'I CLAIMS PAID 116/11/BA II
WAR
PA NT k0. VF NI:OP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
'I Utl]567 UALC f. MUVEYMAN $222.64 DEFERRED COMP. PAYOFF ,
08058 HUKTINGTO6 PEACH RUPSE.R STAMP S53.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES
0
8"59 h11ATINGTON SUPPLY 3181.19 HARDWARE
JP6560 ISCO COHPAPIY i5.979.24 PUMP PARTS
(' CPU561 II CORP. 5628.0P LAB SERVICES
0RG5F2 1NPEPIAL WEST CHEMICAL ,,. 1121047.59 FERROUS CHLORIDE
880563 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS S1N5.20 TOOLS
/ J84U61 19VIkE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 50.00 WATER USAGE
UBC!65 CHARLES A. JACKS f39.e6 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
f PJS66 THE JANITORS SHOPPE f181.3 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
( HtlU M67 JONES CHEMICALS. INC. f101 J86.96 CHLORINE
P9156B NIEWIT PACIFIC CO. _ _ S138.532.02 CONTRACTOR PW-061PQ a PN-0610.-)
OAC Fb4 KING BEARING. INC. 1172.53 BEARINGS
OR J570 11HSI PUMP 6 MACHINE WORKS $769.70 PUMP PARTS
I 18157I. MLEEN-L IML CORP SI.J07.83 _ JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
d8f572 L.A. LIQUID HANDLING SYSIEMS 1527.84 - PUMPS
48(573 LAUPSEN COLOR LAB $6.94 FILM PROCESSING
081,571 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. $297.12 _ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
CPI-75 LIETEAU PAlTFBNS• INC. - i266.25 FABRICATE IMPELLER PATTERN
i 680976 L1I CCOM-SAi FT SERVICE SUPPLY $45..0 SAFETY SUPPLIES
OR-"? LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS. INC. $410.01 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
a BL57K MALCOM PIBNIE. INC. %359512.87 ENGINEERING PI-25
u Prt79 MARINE L VALVE SUPPLY 1874.81
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
Otl`5FJ FAIT - CNLCP9 INC. f98.97 PUMP PARTS
y.A 98O5tl1 JOSEPH A. MCDONALD $62.74 DEFERRED COMP. PAYOFF
08 A582 MC PADDEN DALE HARDWARE CO. $32.52 TOOLS
j URA9F3 MICROSICS CORPORATION 319102.R8 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIR
069501 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. 129857.00 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
J8558b MONTGOMEPY ELEVA700 COMPANY $328.46 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
LF65P6 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES _. S2.3/0.D0_ ,___. ..__.,,_. . , . LAB SERVICES
0A6!P7 J. ARTHUR POORE, Ch. INC. S651.65 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
l OB 1.EPA NASCO WEST9 INC. 3236.61 EQUIPMENT PARTS
6605h9 NATIONAL LUMBER $19183.71 HARDWARE
9P 5P 90 NA71ONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $175.01 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP
I'11 UBC5P1 RORY NELSON $22.42 DEFERRED COMP. PAYOFF
086992 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 180.91
1 rD�fA3 NUEVO CAMINO CONSTk UCT10N 12E1015.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
/ C6c.F- 4 NUEVO CANINO CONSTRUCTORS $3,166.11 CONTRACCONTRACTOR 2-10-IA
^6(`P5 GCEAN SALT CO.. INC. 1330.72 SALT TOP 2-10-IA
L 6Ra596 OLYKPIC CHEMICAL CO. 161.b96.69 SALT
O845o7 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $908.87 BULK CHLORINE
',Rf°90 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 1646.71 HYDROCHLORICELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
0POF99 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALI 1135.75 ELECTRICALS ACID
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
! I RPI.60J ORANGE
VALvr 1 iITIIN( CO. . ERN IC AL SUPPLIES
CPO60 OMIGE CORP $676.47 BEARINGS
CPffA7 OXYGEN FFRViCf $1.718.68
OXYGEN
L � i
I '
AvI
FUND NO 91"'! JT PIST MCOKING CAPITAL PROCES5I116 DATE 6/05/06 PAGE 4
PFPORT NUMBER 11`43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY i
•� CLAIMS PAID 96/11/86
WARPLP:T N0. VENGOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
_ POP603 fOLNTY OF OPINfE f299.80 LAD SERVICES
P01664 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 16,209.76 REIMBURSE WORKERS CORP. INSURANCE FUND
00 LE G5 , PACIFIC SAFETY COUIP MEN I CO. 61.270.64 SAFETY SUPPLIES
FB!:EU6 PACIFIC BELL 1178.63 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES -,
08CF07 PEAT. MARWICK. MITCHELL L CO. 1521 BC ANNUAL AUDIT
-I DF -6C8 PORTER BOILER SERVICE. INC. $509 80 _ BOILER REPAIR
r FRf 609 POSTMASTER - - $2.030.00 - - - POSTAGE
080610 HAROLO PRIMROSE ICE 333.00 ICE
PBVill PROGRESSIVE STEEL SUPPLY 11,300.55 STEEL
186612 PULASKI 8 ANITA ARCHITECTS - 310.287.06 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES/J-7-4 A PI-26
08P613 PU LSAFE EDER $740.82 PUMP PARTS
U Bf F14 RAINOOW DISPOSAL CO. Eg61.25 _. TRASH DISPOSAL
I" CBGF15 PE-CY-KLEEN CORP. ST1.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
CB 1616 REMEUx TEMP f66A.60 TEMPORARY SERVICES
UBC617 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. _ .___. $846.07_ PIPE SUPPLIES
; I CPf R.Itl RE3 NOP0. IXC. $39.61 ELECTRI UL SUPPLIES
CBDf.19 RICHARDS, WATSON, DREYFUSS 372.66 LEGAL SERVICES/WAIT OF MANDATE ACTION
080620 ROBBINS 3 MYERS INC. _ f773 RO PUMP PARTS
¢ OBO621 ROCCO-S TRUCK WRECKING $225 00
"P•'� DSP622 SANCON FNGINEEPING . INC. 1625 110 TRUCK PARTS
IprTO1! (BP 623 S414TA AKA ELECTRIC MOTORS $330 LP COAT ACID CONTAINMENT SLAB
08(614 SCIENCE APPLICATION INT•L CORE - - 363i7iT 50 -' ELECTRIC ROTOR
( 691625 SEA [OAST DESIGNS 3142.45 OCEAN MONITORING
OFFICE FURNITURE
00PF26 SHAPROCK SUPPLY _ _ 342.15 SAFETY SUPPLIES
68L'627 SIGMA ENERGY SYSTEMS SI94.63 POW DMrf2R SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 1695.00 EMPLOYEE MEDICALEMS -
4PF629 SMITH-FPERY CO. _ _ 124.00 CONCRETE TESTING
580630 50LNAR COPE. - 1755.25 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
OSGE31 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. f81349.49 POWER
081632 50. CALIF. WATER CO. $14.94 WATER USAGE
ORP633 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 017.499.63-
DIESEL FUEL
;I 00r R35 STAR OW STEEL S798.70 STEEL
(e LF 35 STAR TOOL L SUPPLY CO. S1.978.45 13340 TOOLS
! 005636 SUN SFT FORD l33.90 TRUCK PARTS
='I DRl6!7 THE SUPPLIERS $39.61 TOOLS
08063P TAP PRODUCTS CO. $430.52 E SUPPLIES
DBE639 THOP.PSON LACOUER CO. f650.44 OFFICE
PAINT SUPPLIES
OREF40 TRANSMERIDIAN CHEMICALS9 INC. $2,412.44
1• C81.641 TRAVEL TRAVEL 11.121.90 CAUSTIC SODA
i" AIR FARE
OP0 L2 642 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY9 INC. 1794.25
DPGt 43 J.G. TUCKER 9 SON, INC. S479. TRUCK PARTS
INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
081.645 UNITLD PARCEL SERVICE .652.84 DELIVERY SERVICE
00¢645 U.S. EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 15.122.19 EQUIPMENT PARTS
00A646 VWIt SCIENTIFIC 35.121.IM LAD SUPPLIES
OPf HT VALIkx EITI[$ SUPPLY CO. 33.491.51
1-i GFPAgM VALVE SFRVICLS. INC. $752.37 , PIPE SUPPLIES
I i VALVE REPAIR
II
I '
'IIi F •
FUND NO ^1'v JT GIST VORKINC CARIIAL . , _ PROCESSING DATE 6/05/B6 PAGE.
I' REPORT "UMBER AU43
CCUNTY SINIIATION.I EISTN ICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY II CLA INS PAID 06/I jig 6
VARNANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT D[SCRIPTION
ICI O611tA9 VAPLC, INC. $3.784.20 - MECHANICAL SUPPLIES .�
G86656 4ALLACE R TIERLAN SE6.3.41 PUMP PARTS
OBP651 JOHN N. NAPLES 9438.23 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT
^F I652 0CHESHA CNFIN[ SERVICFNTCF 32,571.ei ENGINE PARTS
( Q OSC663 UESTMINSIER GLASS 6 MIRROR $54.68 GLASS ".
Pe t-54 WHITE. FINE 0 VERVILLE X5016.52
GBC655 WITEG SCIENTIFIC - 350.SC - -- DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY
LAB SUPPLIES
( C61456 XEROX CORP. 32,487.18 COPIER LEASE
C86f57 6EORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES .,,_ ,$637.1$_ _. ELECTRICAL PARTS
060658 21Y TEMPORARY EERSONNFL 31.413.15 TEMPORARY SERVICES
( ,I 06Of 59 RICHdRO E. OUCH 9251.13_ DIRECTORS COMP. 6 MILEAGE
F- TOTAL CLAIMS FAID o6/11/RE -6910,683.99
X SUMMARY AMOUNT
/1 OPEN FUND $ 1,000.75 ,
[Rf /2 OPER FUND -_(� 1,269.50-82 ACO FUND 360.50
F ! 02 F/R FUND 31,211.61
03 OPEN FUND
B5 OPER FUND 946.81
(' � #5 ACD FUND 360.00
/7 OPER FUND 7,411.50
07 F/R FUND
(. Li 111 OPER FUND 79260.03
IF ACO FUND _ _ _- 480.00 -
1566 OPER FUND
Cl. 35
' 0697 OPER FUND 93.81
3,580.82
COREJT OPER FUND 256.403.79
SELF 256,403.79
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL 8,209.76
I ! 81,072.21
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/11/86 $810,683.49
1.'
I �
tl
FUND NO q1 Iu - .I1 IIIST NOPKINO CAPITAL PROCESSING UATE A/1q/A6 PAGE 1
REPORT NUNIIC.R AFAS
COUP.T1 SANITATION C.ISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY "" -
I'� CLAIRS FAIO 36/25/86
.i NARPfNT PO. VENEER. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
USLE75 ARE CITIES SUPPLY• INC. S1.1!22.3E STEEL
CSC676 AGM FLECTMONICF• INC, 1211.04 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
08G677 tAs CLFETNONICS.INC. f063.43 ELECTRIC ALARM
CBC676 ICCU-PRIMI ON COPY f6T0.19 PRINTING
11I 080679 LINCOLN CARPETS B INTCA10R5 f2:303:113 INSTALL TILE-PLT. I
0896P0 ARAM SOAR INO US"
IES• INC. $421.35 LAB SUPPLIES
CMO6B1 4DYANCEO OFFICE SEPYI CIS S971.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
SAC6A2 AEPOCOMP. INC. - $6.391:n0 ENGINEERING PI-26 f PZ-33
OB068T AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. S15.56 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PSORPA AIR PHO70 SERVICES 1 $338.24 1 BLUEPRINTING COMPUTERIZED
ORS
UPC 6P6 AIR INERT CAN B CHEMICAL INC. - f70i$27.29 "' IMPLEMENT ON MATERIALS PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
0866M6 ALL AMEBIC AN ASP MALT 498.10 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
C B CF67 ALL•STATT VEHICLES. INC. f1.496.10 VEHICLE LEASE
'- O6^6PM ALLIS-CHALMERS CORP. - "" "- -' S2.R1 ' --- --- PUMP PARTS
^81!6P9 ALLIS-C MALMERS EQUIPMENT SRC. f2.01q.60R0 PUMP PARTS
08:691 ALTA SALTS. INC. ST1.73 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
II99G7 GOO E91 AMERICAN CYANAMID SI7:382.53-' -' CATIONIC POLYMER
9P C692 AMERICAN FLEET PARTB 1657.59 TRUCK PARTS
00693 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS f63.62 LAB SUPPLIES
�= 080694 ANALABS "" "'- f260:00 -" " -_-' -'-
LAB SERVICES
Y-' 08695 THE ANCHOR. PACKING CO. 1321.18 MECHANICAL PARTS
.. 081696 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES GROUP 1122.60 TOWEL ION RENTAL �C
08I697 AQUA PIKE CORP. -' "- - f5i237.83 ANIONIC POLYMER 1
"• lIS-w_S' OBP659 ARRTHE ATCI, ELECTRIC CORP. 1156.32 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
OP DF90 THE Al A SF RAILWAY CO. f136.12 TRACK REMOVAL f REPLACEMENT/CONTR. 2-6-2
0807P0 ATONIC SPECTROSCOPY T8:U0 - PUBLICATION
r l'07701 BKK COFP BRAT ION $3.724.71 SLUDGE DISPOSAL
080702 ESE CONSULTANTS. INC. $2,413.26 ENGINEERING PV-144
Q8T7C3 BANK OF AAERICA NT B SA -$1,663.56 TRAVEL EXPENSE
060709 EVACON DAY ENTFRPRISCS. INC. $75.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
I 4B t'705 RECKON
INOUS TRIAL/VROCESS $2.286.41 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
089706 PECKNAN INnUSTRTAL CO. 1544.91 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
I L' 081:707 PEPULR MACHINE INC. 1950.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
p Mi711P PEVCO IACIIS7RIAL VEHICLES $45.44 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
L 060709 OMR/pIC. ROV 14,990.00 TRASH DISPOSAL
U OM071C PUCKEYL GAS CP.000CT5 $21.21 PROPANE000711 BUILDING MILS, INC. S05.17 PUBLICATION
' P80]12 THC QUAKE COMPANY $185.55 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
APIT13 PUAIE ENf INFIRINC C^. 1g34.^P ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
Of P 714 YILLIAI! N. 4UTLCN $3.13.92 PETTY CASH
OP:715 C-•I CALIFO^NIA. EKE. $3.818.19 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
OP'1716 CS COPAAPY 1153.P0 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
461717 CIL-1LPTITIONS. ICC, S1.11B.04 OFFICE FURNITURE
1'FP719 CIL SOUTH COUIIHCI•T CC. /1 014.T5 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
061734 (40POL . TIC. l7g).n7
VALVES
Pp 7t2S IV LIPOP CIA CGM IP ELS CR. a14 R.R2 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
FUND NO L" JI PI51 ACPKINF CAPITAL PROCFSSIN6 DAZE A/I^/RA PAGE 7
REPORT WUNDER AP43
COUNTY CANTTA TTON 07STPICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 'I6/)5/66 !
WARPANT Nn. VENOOP AMOUNT OCSCPIFTTON
O60)Pl F.ALIFDRh1A DANCE A VFNIER 390.2E CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
9607P2 CALS CAPCPA $199.64 CAMERA SUPPLIES
DSO723 CA6TLL CONTPOLO. INC. $278.17 VALVE
080729 CENIFL SYSTEMS S3.075.62 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
.1i OPC725 CNFNVCST INDUSTRIES. INC. S15.796.90 FERRIC CHLORIDE
OPS726 A.V. CHESTERTON CO. S155.26 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
CP4727 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. f4.956.62 GASOLINE/OIL
.I 980728 CIIEVRON USA. INC. - -- -" $32.67"" "'" GASOLINE
D 80129 CNICU f.A ME FI SM FPNM $54.00 FISH
Dtl0730 P.P. CL AFP CO.. INC. $61.96 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
080731 C.LE.t. . CO. . INC. --' ' - $720.00-' -" PUMP REPAIR
0P0 732 CO NNELL G.N. PAR IS / DIV. fN5.79 TRUCK PARTS -
081,733 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. S5.629.57 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
1180739 CONSOLIDATED RFPFOGRAPMICS "'- -""" -'"" f94 A:Af"'_"" ' - " -
(' UCTION
089735 CONTROL DATA COPPCPATION 11,191.00 BLUEPRINTING ON EQUIPMENT
INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
-1 08973E CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY 3189.43 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
C80)L) COOPER Ek[PG1 SERVICES - " "'"11177:P3" ' "' '
MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
(. FT1 080739 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S213.33 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
x OPn759 CAL VA OF t$19.06 _ WATER SOFTENER RENTAL
• = 080790 STATE OF CALIFORNIA "-"" "-"- '319.08'"'-- PUBLICATION
8Pn 1A1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S160.00 PROCESSING FEE/ANNEX. 62/DIST. /2
080792 ONE. INC. S665.25 PIPE SUPPLIES
C907A3 HE D.N.W. GROUP{ INC. -" '_' TBp2:85 ` `
DATA PROCESSING SERVICES/PARCEL BILLING FILES
083749 DAILY PILOT IP1.84 LEGAL ADVERTISING
CO 080795 UAI!IELS TIRE SERVICE S1.230.53 TRUCK PARTS
I•,�N 680746 N.A. p.4RCY COMPANY "' "'"` -""91F792C64'-" -' EQUIPMENT PARTS
f 181747 OECD $509.39 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
OS07A8 PIE GUELLE A SONS GLASS CO. 1495.35 GLASS
D8A749 CEW-PAR SALES 6 SFBVi[C - _ S423.34 SAFETY SUPPLIES
DR0750 DIESEL LOGISTICS. INC. $150.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
OB 9751 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATLS $864.22 PRINTING
060752 PIG I TA E9U/P H ENT COPP. -' ""'"" S192.00 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
-I 069753 DOPAOO CHTFPPRISES. INC. $17.207.09 REPAIR COLD BOX-PLT. 2
0150759 DUMAS DIESEL INJECTION $3.563.28 PUMP PARTS
, IV 680755 PUNN EDWARDS CORP. S1.955.17 PAINT SUPPLIES
08P7% TAL CORP. f2.550.0U LAB SUPPLIES
(1 8R P757 WI LI!CP EAOS TI30.00 DEFERRED COMP, DISTRIBUTION
C60758 EASTMAN, INC. S2.011.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES
OP.O759 LULL S217.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES
I DRL'760 NARSNALL FAIRPFS S390.00 DEFERRED COMP. DISTRIBUTION
I, ! ^80761 FALLOVA SHREDDER CC.. INC. S9.209.Cn SLUDGE GRINDER
i C80762 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $11.30 DELIVERY SERVICE
080763 FILTIR SUPPLY CO. $779.38
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
D807EA FIt[UFP S iORT Ffl Co. f1.109.33
DS0765 IOPPLN ANS. INC. SI68.09 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
OPERATIONS SUPPLIES
P69766 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT f1.981.Ei
"•III; PAINT SUPPLIES
FUND NO 91 JI GI41 WORKING CAIITPL PROCESSING RATE 6110/66 FAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
._ CAMNTY SAP.ITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 16/25/B6
, I
WARRANT AT. VENOOP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
O BP]f7 POkALO L. FDA R ASSGCIATES LP24.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT
01107EP FgAACL COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $2.015.64 EQUIPMENT PARTS I
080769 FRANKLIM MILLER ♦ INC. $9.209.00 SLUDGE GRINDER �
C8Ci7V INFEWAY TRUCK FARTS $2.296.76 TRUCK PARTS
C80771 FRUIT GMUVFRS IARORATORY. INC. 930.00 LAB SERVICES
080772 CITY OF FULLERTON 3117.96 WATER USAGE
080773 TRUCK A PUS GROUP/GM $7.9118.16 TRUCK
1 000774 GAMAML LUMBER CO. -STi09S":07 LUMBER
96C775 GANOALF DATA INC. $2.310.06 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
080776 GASKET EMGINFEPING t127.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES _
OPC777 GCMERAL TELEPHONE CO. _$3.310.77-_ TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES
( OF0778 GICRLICN-MITCHELL. INC. - —$10.109.93 — — VERTICAL GRIDS
-
,
O60779 GOULD INC. $316.00 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
9P0780 M-0 INSTRUMENT COMPANY 5299.94 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
EOR p@p7Pl G f- ., E 00.GF T• PALL CO. $92.64 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
C80782 A. HARPER S425 04 TRAVEL EXPENSE
081783 MAPRINC.TON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 'fA:T6R 09 - INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
! Ail CR01H MOERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 5179 48 EQUIPMENT PARTS
081,785 HOOPER CAMCPA STOKES SgM2.40 CAMERA SUPPLIES
•2 004786 CITY OF PUNTINGTON BEACH - - -ilT 87 - WATER USAGE ,
086787 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $33.917 90 REIMBURSE MANHOLE REPAIRS
G8o768 PYCROTEK 5995.66 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
080789 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL fl:6R1:50 - '" FERROUS CHLORIDE 1
[` i80790 INDIAN SFRINGS MFG. CO., INC. 579.72 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
., 1 OeP]91 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 5192.97 HARDWARE
O80792 IN49eM PAPER -' '" --_f410.30 "- '" _ OFFICE SUPPLIES
�W 00-793 IN PLACE MACHINING CO. fL VSS.OP MECHANICAL REPAIRS
084794 INTERNATIONAL TECIINULOGY S209.O0 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
CAC7P5 GLENN P. JAMESON $455.00 ENGINEERING PI-28 6 PI-26
O60796 IN[ JANITOR.•$ SHOPPE 3427.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
( ��• O8097 JONFS CHEMICALS, INC. 319.0116.96 CHLORINE
88 U79B KAMAN DCARINGS L SUPPLY - " ' -S452.31 - -'-" -_'_.__ - BEARINGS
Jtlul99 KCFA-KUT ABRASIVE CO. $301.60 TOOLS
OB VPCp KEENAN SUPPLY $616.78 MECHANItAL SUPPLIES
GR 0841 KING REARING. INC. 91,699.85 BEARINGS
f OP DP,U2 CONALD C. KINNTY 3799.00 DEFERRED COMP. DISTRIBUTION
OP 9F D; XIR2T PUMP A MACHIHI UORNS S430.11 PUMP PARTS
geca" MR. HARTIK KOROICK. SR. 22:17O.00 ENGINEERING 2-25
PRONGS I A N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO $5.321.90 UNIFORM RENTAL
OP08C6 L.A. LIG1110 HANDLING SYSIF.MS SS4.99 PUMPS
1 , S$70.22 TRUCK PARTS
1 DETECT LCN[0 ELECTRIC CO.
. . C.I OP CA CA LI:H11MF• pISTP IDBTDP c. INC. 314.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
111 O8EK09 LILLY TYFESEITINO $179.t0 PRINTING
Al BgC810 N.P. LINDSTROM. INC. 1951.77 PCB CONTROL PROGRAM
L`r({ O90611 LOS ANGEL[' TIMES fl.1D3.74 LEGAL ADVERTISING
3I CPCK12 LONNY E AS SOCl eTE9 $150•CP ENGINEERING 2-24
FUND NO 91i1" JT 111.1 WDRKING CAI'IIAL PROCESSING DAIC. 6/15/06 PAGE A
REPORT MUMMER Af43
.� ' C(UNTV '..fl'ITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
f CLAIMS PAID 96/25/Sb
i YAROANT TIC. YPN OOR AMOUNT OESCRIPITON
OP 01'13 PA6RA1.01 VALYC CORP. f667.74 VALVE
C39PU PAIA FP AMC SERVICES S6.0
73.00 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR
.I OBLOIR MAJOP LOCK SUPPLY f197.62 HARDWARE
.I OF r,A16 MAHYAC ELECTRONICS $790.96 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
OSCPI7 MATT - f.HLOR. INC. f239.32 CHLORINATION EQUIPMENT
OBOP18 MCC.CY SAEET METAL WORKS. INC.. $306.66 EQUIPMENT PARTS
1 OP9PIa pCHACTER-CAPR SUPPLY CO. 51113.72 NECHN41CAL SUPPLIES
011 pP 1 "EV.SCO. INC. 9368.41 " " '""
q LIES
OSD621 PICFO MOTION $691.37 CHLORINATION ONPEQUIP
CSOP22 MINE StFF7Y APPLIANCES CO. f1.856.39 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
• SAFETY EQUIPMENT
010623 NOWARK EL INC. f13.$57.62 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
/ PSUb2R NF.WANI (CHEMICAL CO. 562.02 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
'Irs09PS26 OLYMPCRINGE[COUNTY
C f35.562.P2 ., BULK CHLORINE
OP0626 CRINGE CDUNTT CHEMICAL CO. '- "'""-f19 F:71"- -
!' OS0827 CRANGC COUNTY WHOLESALE $12.39 HYDROCHLORIC RCID
ELECTRICAL PARTS
1 OBOO29 ORA46C VALVE K FITTING CO. f2A052.63 PIPE SUPPLIES
CP ON 29 0YFP PC AD OCOp CO OF ORANGE CTY "" '" ""''f23'0:00 ' "'" ' DOOR REPAIR
m 0BpP30 OVY GIN SERVICL fb59.30 OXYGEN I
X 98OP31 COUNTY OF ORANGE f2.110.20 COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT
.i2 980832 CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTFOLLER "- "'-"115 Ti P78.00" '-" "- SLUDGE DISPOSAL
08OP33 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 57.996.75 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND
OOOM39 PACIFIC MCCHANICAL SUPPLY $495.35� PUMP PARTS I� 080935 PACIFIC SAFETY COUIPPENT CO. '- 9606.93 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
980P36 PACIFIC BELL $786.42 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES
CTI OBAR77 PACIFIC MELDING A MANUFACTURING $12A.23
_ __ MELDING SUPPLIES
_ .r 039338 FAOAGDN BUSINESS SYS7f M3 " 'S993.79 "" """ COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES
OAOK39 POY BOYS GpAFT fA9Q.09 DEFERRED COMP. OISTRfBUT10N
CAOR40 PER' BOYS f77.C9 BICYCLE SUPPLIES
OBCPq ROPIER RAILER SERVICE. INC. """ $276.R5
^I �� ENGINE PARTS
O80342 ROPER L TRAIN PRIMROSE
INDUSTRIES R$60.00 TRUCK PARTS
I 9b0PV HAx OID PPIMpO S[ ICE f60.00 ICE
080899 PRO6PESSIVE STEEL SUPPLY " ' -f 381:30 '-'" ' STEEL
OPp395 GUAL17Y BUILDING SUPPLY 590.28 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
98CP96 OUONUII INTCPNATIONAL UNLLD. $33.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES
6 ORDP47 TIIE PEC.ISTER S49.58 LEGAL ADVERTISING
I.� 0806A3 VFFEOV TEMP 1610.56 TEMPORARY SERVICES
I 963R99 111C NCI'UBLIC SUPFLV CO. 9326.88 PIPE SUPPLIES
eEPP8) RICHAPO.S HYDRAULICS $73.13 TRUCK PARTS
O60851 AICDI, COOP 1356.69 COPIER LEASE
OPOP52 AOHES tUl0 iR1N 1t91.60 TRUCK PARTS
O00053 SAODLEPACK SffEDOKCTCX t131.17 TRUCK PARTS
UK!H59 SCI•AEFfk OIYON ASSOCIATES 1675.90 SOILS TESTING
I [POPS SEA COAST PESIPNS 5131.P.Q OFFICE FURNITURE
OPCF56 SEARS, ROCOUCK AND CO. 5175.7P PUMP PARTS
0301,57 SPAMROCK SUPPLY $42.15 SAFETY SUPPLIES
930858 SKYHAAK MALK-IN MLOICAL CLIkIC f1.197.0P EMPLOYEE MEDICAL EXAM
T
FUND NO "t+^ - Ji RIST WORKING CAPI7/L FROCESSINO PITT 6/IR/RH PAGE .
REPORT NUMBER AP43
61 COUNTY SANITATION DISTPICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - t
CLAIMS PAID 06/15/96 i
NAP.RANT KU. VF NOOP AMOUNT CESCRIPTION � I
OPn859 s91 p'd NF Rr I CO. T356.CF[` CONCRETE TESTING
UFOP6C CII AF.LFf •.+ITN CO., INC. S2i567:08 TRUCK PARTS
OpG861 c04 RII. CORP. S9.950.75 BACTERIA CULTURES FOR DIGESTER CLEANING
300862 SOUTH CPAS7 DODGE l298.42 TRUCK PARTS
OBnA63 SO. CALIF COASTAL MAIER 5139.65C.00 ANNUAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION
.81,664 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. f379.834.25 POWER
C82865 EO. CSL. GAS CO. $25.957.73 NATURAL GAS
�., 080R66 S9UTHCPN COUNTIES OIL CO. --' 83:642:74 - - DIESEL FUEL
f. „ P8 PE67 SP eA RLETTS DRINKING WATER $951.48 BOTTLED WATER
,. RRntl6R STAINLESS FIRE B FITTING CC. $222.22 PIPE SUPPLIES
,.I 080869 STAR TOOL 9 SUPPLY CO. - -' ' '"'32081.36 TOOLS
(. 38FE70 SCOTT STEVCRS 310.06 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE
489871 STONHARDi INC. $339.35 GRIT EQUIPMENT
O8 C972 SUPRIT STEEL - ' - - - - --'---'-'--S205:64-"'-- - -"--'
r I Otl OB73 THE $UPrLIERS $4,251.91 ALUMINUM TUBING
SAFETY SUPPLIES
, 087 SVFLTLA Np CO. $92 2O ALUMINUM TUBING
FBC84075 CeSTLF / DIV. OF SYPRON COPP: """"'- `-' $2I2 00 "" "-'-
LAB EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
c: 080876 TMOMPBON LACQUER CO. 38 96
fTl PAINT SUPPLIES
GRn817 TRap5 Ary F0.1CA OPL $86 i649 00 _ ENGINE REAPIP
OBP27P TRUJAN GASKET It 8 SU SUPPL I, INC: '-- " '-"3278.25- - '- - --
r iMECHANICAL SUPPLIES
- '-' "GREG TRUCK R AUTO SUPPLY. INC.CNf. fl•437 99 TRUCK PARTS 1
Ibp Ofl.08, J.G. TUCKER R SON. INC. $931 E5 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES
P8nP81 UNOCAL '""'— --"f38 13 "-' - GASOLINE
r' Ob CR02 UNIIED PARCEL SERVICE 5179 14 DELIVERY SERVICE
tb0 ORDE03 UNIVERSAL HACK 1389.14 TRUCK PARTS
C P.G R84 V.O.C. TCSTING - " ' - --— —'3,31400'00 - - """
7 I 'N OOCP.P.5 VUR SCIENTIFIC. $720.89 DIGESTER GAS TESTING
PRGP86 VALLrY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 91.995.98
LAB SUPPLIES .)
� _59 PIPE SUPPLIES
98CP.P7 VALVC 9F.RV ICES• INC. """' -S1:995:90 -" EQUIPMENT REPAIR
9E4609Per VARIC• INC. f9.919.49 DIGESTION EQUIPMENT
I OBO8N9 CARTCF INDUSTRIESE 399 B.9R
..__. DOOR REPAIR
DBG891 CAPL WARREN R CO.0. - - - S123.09"-'"- ' LAB
CORP. ADMINISTRATION
4RLtl91 Y9PPINGTON 3123 AO
I•' LAB SUPPLIES
C 8OP92 WELLS RA" I 33.604.00 REFUND USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT
CBCC93 VEST C0e91 INSTALLATIONS $604.00 OFFICE FURNITURE
CRC094 WFITENN VINE R ALLOY 3296.99 PUMP PARTS
OBCR9%6 WORE. FI NF R VCR ViIII 32.3v3.21 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY
OBPP96 BOURNE ! '1000PUFF $37.921.59 - LEGAL SERVICES
I + -80897 SAVIIP. INVUSTRIES i67.A0 LAB SUPPLIES
Pe Vb9s rpox CUP,. SIi3018.65
08R899 CCGPGE Y%RnLEY ASSOCIATES 3253.81 COPIER LEASE
a n 90G rVEREII NI. YORK co. $365.91 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
98P9O1 21P TEMFOPARY PF RSONNIL 3644.38 ENGINE PARTS
TEMPORARY SERVICES
fi TOTAL CLAIMS FAIT /ZS/b6 11i27'Ii39A_96
FUND NO 9199 - JT WORKING CAPITAL - PROCESSING DATE 6/19/86 PAGE 6 i.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REPORT NUMBER AP43 I
.i CLAIMS PAID 06/25/66
( a
SUMMARY AMOUNT - I
BI OPER FUND $ 1.278.85
BI ACE FUND 640.24
/ ^I 12 OPER FUND 3,922.19
•'I 12 ACO FUND 3,922.19 - ..-
/1 F/R FUND 153.00 --
/3 OPER FUND 41,153.03 1
B3 ACE FUND 348.96
"I 15 OPER UNDO 7r351.80
•I BS ACO FUND 51.76
16 OPER FUND 455,63
16 ACO FUND 43.76
/7 OPER FUND _ —.._ _ ... _. .....
/7 ACO FUND 4,256.96 -
56.96
B14 OPER FUND 14,277.45
27 -- - - - - -
/14 ACO R FUND
605.99
1596 OPER FUND 4.423 31
B566 ACE FUND h,413.30 ---- -. ----- -- - -
� , 1697 OPER FUND 93.98
A JT OPER FUND G09.393.99
" OORF 159,929.59--_ . ..... _.__ . .. .....
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 10,145.74
Is JT WORKING CAPITAL 206,052.94
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/25/86 $l.270.390,96
..i
C L.I
L.
1. I1
jy
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the
�..✓ hour of 7:30 p.m., July 9, 1986, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to Wednesday,
July 30, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 9, 1986.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to Wednesday,
July 30, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:55 p.m., July 9, 1986.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to Wednesday,
July 30, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:55 p.m. , July 9, 1986.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and
correct copy of minute entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the
9thday of July, 1986.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my band this 9th day of July, 1986.
Secretary of tFie Boards of Directors
�r of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14