The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986-05-28 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �a P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 108"ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 May 21, 1986 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 5 WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 1986 - 7 : 30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of May 14, 1986 , the Hoard of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date to review the District's master plan of sewerage facilities and long-range financial program. Secretary BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts post Otti4 Sox $127 of Orange County, Caldornia 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telepho : Mee Code 714 DISTRICT No. 5 9a22410 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. (1) Roll Call (2) Appointment of Secretary pro tem (3) verbal status report on the District's sewer rehabilitation program and Master Plan of facilities to serve the District (4) Review of long-range financial program projections (5) Other business and communications, if any (6) Consideration of motion to adjourn MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 Of Orange County, Celifamie 10844 Ellis AvenueFountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 DISTRICT NO. 5 962-24111 IIMANAGER'S REPORT TO DISTRICT NO. 5 DIRECTORS MEETING DATE: MAY 28, 1986 Update on the District's long-range financial program In 1981, the Board adopted a supplemental user fee program to make up the shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and provide needed additional financing for operations and major rehabilitation work on the sewer system. The following fee schedule` is currently in effect: Single Unit Parcels Connected Meter Size Annual Fee 1" or less $ 26.40 lh" 52.50 2" 105.00 3" 210.00 4" 420.00 6" 840.00 Be 1,680.00 If parcel contains more than one water meter, then the charge applicable to each meter shall be added together, and the BUM levied against the parcel. Multi-Unit Parcels Per Unit $15.85 when the program was originally presented to the public and adopted by the Board, it was anticipated that it would be necessary to increase the fees by approximately 77% beginning with the second year to finance the rehabilitation work on the trunk sewer system. The District has been able to delay any increase in the supplemental user fees originally adopted in 1981 due to a significant decline in inflation rates, receipt of favorable bids on various District and joint works construction and rehabilitation projects, and delays in various major plant projects, all of which have reduced District expenditures well below budgeted levels. In addition, on the revenue side of the budget, the turnaround in economic conditions and the resultant new construction and resale activity over the past few years have resulted Page Two May 28, 1986 in a significant increase in the assessed valuation of properties in the District, whic'� has generated additional ad valorem tax revenues for the District. Further, the formation of new District 14 has resulted in the District receiving approximately $2,000,000 from the new district's purchase of capacity in the joint treatment and disposal facilities. The positive financial impacts of District 14'5 formation on District 5 are further reinforced by the Joint District' concurrent shift to a 100% flow-based method of allocating ownership and each district's share of joint treatment works construction costs. Schedule A (attached) presents the District's projected financial condition over the next five years based on the current fee schedules. This preliminary cash flow projection indicates that the revenues generated by the District's current supplemental user fee schedule in combination with the District's higher ad valorem tax revenues will be sufficient to fund 100% of the District's operating expenses for the next five years. Schedule B (attached) presents the District's schedule of trunk sewer projects for the next seven years. The cash flow projections also indicate that the District's projected revenues from connection fees, Federal and State grants, sale of capacity rights to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) , interest and miscellaneous income, income resulting from the formation of District 14 in January, 1986, and contributions from developers for planned development south of the District will provide sufficient capital funds to finance the projects defined on Schedule B over the next five years. Staff recommends that the District retain its current connection fee and supplemental user fee schedules through 1986-87 based upon the District's favorable financial positir as reflected on Schedule A. We are presently evaluating the impact of proposed new development within the District's sewage system and, upon completion of that study, will report to the Board with respect to the connection fee schedule. Staff will review the District's financial projections for 1986-87 and update the Board members on the Master Plan of sewerage facilities at the May 28th meeting. 0340Y SAW'AT1U1 @.91MCF M. 5 5/l0/ta SCHEDULE 8 9�E��Q,�5141II1 Ply pmd t ' l C.I.P. 198697 3 -68 USS-99 198490 1990-91 1991- 2 1993-93 RadiO Llnke1281amtt (a) W'000 So.= meat'IImk Rath laim (3) 1. Bitter R RmP statim to Refit Blv . (a)- 1.150r Wo 750.W0 400,= 3. Smm Are Rit w R=q 3. S1iP Lice mmc HtyaaQ' 3,4W,000 4W,W0 1,WO,OW 1rW0,W0 P/S W Mm Mi. (3))R(a)• 1,WO,WO 1,WO,WO RdkabMtate Lim mtm rein aM MS Fotm aflin Lim Rate atdo to t01ve 9^) �25 (2)W 890,0W W,OW WO,WO 250,0W 'A^ St., 14M Et., ad Lim ((3u(a) mo,ow SO,= mo,WO So,= 'Iltsu< Lim Pew W 'A'1ttada SCteeE (3)(a) 1,300,W0 ]DO,WO 500,000 SW,OW 2W,W0 8ry W&P A St tim IDpm�amtta al WO,WO 50,000 5W,000 so,= Bayalde Rite D Sass (A)(3)(a) 1,im,000 Wo,Wo 300,Wo aBe233Weme PtmJe (a) 350AW W'000 50,000 So,= SO,Om 50,WO W.Wo %'m all-m=l im Rvd 9.OW.WO W.WO 1.6W.WO 3.150,OW 1,800,000 1,300,OW 1.050,OW SO,WO SO,OW Rita Okutk Snst 1(al 1rW0,W0 1,BWrWO Can® Slmt® Rno 9atim ndSmte R k ((33)laity CWrWO SOrWO 350.W0 2W,W0 of Dal mut Rmp mt' Statlm(a) 1,000,000 1'm'm M- Poop statlm 1 )(al 400,000 WO,WO Rreislm o ya st e�M N�aeIcpmt (aa)) SVN wee 300rW0 ='mo anmaalan.e FWJets (a) 175,000 25,W0 25,000 25,W0 £rrWO 25,W0 B'm 25,OW 9P+Bma1 m Fuld 4.075,WO 0 75,000 175,000 1,825.000 25,OW 1.625.00 m'm 25,Om C8A D UAL ]3.114,W0 W,000 1.675,OW 3.324.W0 3.625,000 1.325.OW 2.675.000 375.OW 75.OW (al Etaded 1. N tw-plwm d Fa Ilties pnse¢ly Wrt (N) Y Raded 2. Y sWrBlamad Facilities d t deeim ('1 Sot R d'Pall b!0lattict 6 3. re -shoed Fsiliti airdlile3 Ba Nh �iWVc mtmttim MEETING DATE May 28, 1986 TIME 7:30 PIRDISTRICTS 5 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS (SALTARELLI)...HOESTEREY..._ (MANOIC).........BAILEY...... (CRANK)........HANSON...... (MURPHY).........BEVERAGE...._ (LUXEMBOURGER).GRISET......_ (ZIEGLER)... .....3UCX........ (MIEDER).......STANTON..... (NORBY).... . . . .. ..AT_:N...... (PERRY)..........CULVER...... DISTRICT 2 (SALTARELLI).... .EDGAR....... r (REESE)..........GRIFFIN..... (NORBY)........CATLIN......_ _ _ (LUXEMBOURGER)...GRISET...... _ (ZIEGLER)......BUC........._ _ _ (CRANK)..........HANSON...... (LUXEMBOURGER).GRISET......_ _ _ (COX)............HART........ (SILZEL).......KAWANAMI....`._ (SALTARELLI).....HOESTEREY..._ (NEOEL)........MAHONEY....._ _ _ (SILZEL).........KAWAKAMI...._ (BEVERAGE).....MURPHY...... _ _ (SALTARELLI).....KENNEDY..... (SCOTT)........NEAL........ _ _ (MEDEL)..........MAHONEY..... (CULVER).......PERRY....... _ _ (COX)............MAURER...... (OVERHOLT).....ROTH........ _ _ (BAKER)..........MILLER...... (BEYER)........SMITH....... _ _ (BEVERAGE).......MURPHY...... (MIEDER).......STANTON..... (SCOTT)..........NEAL........ (NELSON).......SUTTON...... (SUTTON).........NELSON...... (LACAYO).........PARTIl...... DISTRICT 3 (CULVER).........PERRY....... _ (COX)............PLUMMER..... (LACAYO).......PARTIN..... (NELSON).........POLIS....... (NELSON).......POLIS ..... (MIEDER).........RILEY.......� (MANDIC).......BAILEY...... (BROWNELL).......RISHER...... (HORSY)........CATLIN...... (OVERHOLT).......ROTH........— (PERRY)........CULVER...... (PACE)...........SAPIEN...... (REESE)........GRIFFIN..... _ _ (MILES)..........SIEFEN.. .... (LUXEMBOURGER).GRISET...... _ _ (BEYER)..........SMITH....... (MEDEL)........MAHONEY..... _ _ (MIEDER).........STANTON..... (SCOTT)........NEAL........ W _ _ (NELSON).........SUTTON...... (SUTTON).......NELSON...... J (MILLER).........$VAN........ _ (BROWNELL).....RISHER...... .I _ _ (SELVAGGI).......SYLVIA...... (OVERHOLT).....ROTH........ p (FINLEY).........THOMAS...... (PACE).........SAPIEN...... 2 _ _ (GALLACHER/GREEN)KAHNER......_ (WILES)........S (KIEDERI.......STANTON..... (SELYIGCI).....SYLVIA...... STAFF: DISTRICT 5 CLARKE......� CURSE......_ (COX)..........MART........ DAWANDERSON....— (COX)..........SHARER...... BUTLER......_ (MIEDER).......STANTON..... _ _ BROWN.......JL BROWN....... DISTRICT 6 BAKER....... (GALLACXER)....WARNER......_ _ VON LANCER _ (COX)..........PLUMMER.....— _ — MINSOR...... (MIEDER).......STANTON...... STREED......:Z:: CLAWSON..... DISTRICT 7 DOTER....... LINDER...... (BAKERRELLI)...EDGAR MILLER......_ (LUXEM)........MILLER...... _ (COX)..........MAURER...... _ (COX)..........MAURE......._ _ _ OTHERS: WOODRUFF (VIEDER........SMITH.. ....._ _ _ ATKENS......� (GREEN)........STANTON......_ _ _ HOMEMER WARD...... (GREENI........WANNER......_ HURT........ HUNT........ DISTRICT ll KEITH KNOPFNOPF....... _ BLANC (MINDER).......BAILEY...... LE ..._(MIEDER)....... ..... LINDSTRO ..._(FINLEY).......THOMAS......_ LYNCH....... MARTIN SON..._ DISTRICT 13 PEARCE...... MASON....... (NELSON).......BUTTON...... YOUNG....... (OVERHOLT).....BEVERAGE...._ (BEYER)LTI.....ROTH.............. , V, (BEYER)........SMETX......._ _ _ SIFT TAMAAAB (A1Z (MIEDER).......STANTON....._ _ 171AIJE D}iERSk-S � \M1q\ E CO DISTRICT li (BAKER)...:....MILLER...... (MILLER).......SWAN........ (SALTARELLI)...KENNEDY..... A_F e 2145 (WIEDER).......RILEY....... (MIEDER).......STANTON..... 05/15/06 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING May 28, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellie Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of May 14, 1986, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' Administrative Offices. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:15 p.m. immediately following the Executive Committee meeting. In the absence of the Secretary, Rita J. Brown, Chairman Hart appointed Gary Streed Secretary pro tem. The roll was called and the Secretary pro tem reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Evelyn Hart, Chairman, Ruthelyn Plummer, Roger Stanton DIRECTORS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Thomas M. Dawes, William H. Butler, Gary Streed OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Sat Tamarabuchi, Diane Dzierski � � � w +. w � z : • � r a n Status report on the District's Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering, sewer rehabilitation program and distributed a map of District 5 showing Master Plan of facilities to serve the existing and proposed sewerage the District facilities and reviewed the status of capital improvement and rehabilitation projects. Mr. Dawes then reviewed the seven year schedule of projects focusing on requirements to serve the expanding Newport Center area and development proposed in the downcoast area by The Irvine Company. The downcoast territory is planned to be served by connecting to City of Newport Beach facilities and that will deliver the wastewater to new District No. 5 trunk sewer facilities. Directors discussed the impact of this development on existing facilities and on the Master Plan and on future financing. Mr. Dawes indicated that staff was reviewing the connection fee in Zone 3, the downcoast area, and the possibility of a reimbursement agreement with The Irvine Company for construction of the necessary facilities to serve the area. Following the discussion, the Board directed staff to advise The Irvine Company of the need for specific data and information relative to development plane in order that the District may complete the necessary sewerage facilities planning, scheduling and financing to serve the areas within the District's boundaries. 05/28/86 Review of long-range financial The staff reported that in 1981, the program projections Board adopted a supplemental user fee program to make up the shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and provide needed additional financing for operations and �.►� major rehabilitation work on the sewer system. The following fee schedule is currently in effect: Single Unit Parcels Connected Meter Size Annual Fee 1" or less $ 26.40 1}" 52.50 2" 105.00 3" 210.00 4" 420.00 6" 840.00 8" 1,680.00 If parcel contains more than one water meter, then .the charge applicable to each meter shall be added together, and the am levied against the parcel. Multi-Unit Parcels Per Unit $15.85 When the program was originally presented to the public and adopted by the Board, it was anticipated that it would be necessary to increase the fees by approximately 77% beginning with the second year to finance the rehabilitation work on the trunk sewer system. The District has been able to delay any increase in the supplemental user fees originally adopted in 1981 due to a significant decline in inflation rates, receipt of favorable bids on various District and joint works construction and rehabilitation projects, and delays in various major plant projects, all of which have reduced District expenditures well below budgeted levels. In addition, on the revenue side of the budget, the turnaround in economic conditions and the resultant new construction and resale activity over the past few years have resulted in a significant increase in the assessed valuation of properties in the District, which has generated additional ad valorem tax revenues for the District. Further, the formation of new District 14 has resulted in the District receiving approximately $2,000,000 from the new District's purchase of capacity in the joint treatment and disposal facilities. The positive financial impacts of District 14's formation on District 5 are further reinforced by the Joint Districts' concurrent shift to a 100% flow-based method of allocating ownership and each District's share of joint treatment works construction coats. The staff reviewed the long-term financial projections which indicate that the revenues generated by the District's current supplemental user fee schedule in combination with the District's higher ad valorem tax revenues will be sufficient to fund 100% of the District's operating expenses for the next five years. The cash flow projections also indicate that the District's projected capital revenues will provide sufficient funds to finance the master planned projects over the next five years. -2- 6/28/86 Staff recommended that the Board retain the current connection fee and supplemental user fee schedules through 1986-87 based upon the District's projected favorable financial position. Staff further reported that it was evaluating the impact of proposed new development on the District's sewage system and, upon completion of that study, will report to the Board with respect to the connection fee schedule. It was then sowed, seconded and duly carried that the staff's recommendation to retain the current fee schedules be, and is hereby, approved. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m., May 28, 1986. S retary ro tem, Board of Directors C unty Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California -3-