Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-03-19 COUNTY SANITATION 'DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10814 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708.7018 (714(982.2411 March 13, 1986 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICT NO. 11 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 1986 - 3: 30 P.M. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY HALL 2000 Main Street - Room B7 Huntington Beach, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of March 12, 1986, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting to be held at the above hour and date to review long-term financing of the District ' s capital and operating requirements. Secretary V BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Peat Offim Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 ' Telephones: rco A Coda 714 D►sTR►CT No. 11 9540-29 6226I1 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 1986 - 3:30 P.M. Huntington Beach City Hall 2000 Main Street - Room B7 Huntington Beach, California (1) Roll call '..✓ (2) Status Report on District's Master Plan of Sewers to serve developing territories in and adjacent to the District (3) Review of long-term financing of the District's capital and operating requirements (4) Other business and communications, if any (5) Consideration of motion to adjourn i MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Gast Office Box 8127 County a County, Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Talepl•mas: Arno Code 714 DISTRICT NO. a62-2-2411 1 1 54011 MEETING DATE MARCH 19, 1986 AT 3:30 P.M. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY HALL For the past several years, the District has been constructing the Coast Trunk Sewer in segments which will provide the needed capacity for the District and, when completed, will direct major flows from the existing collection system which partially utilizes District No. 3 facilities. To date, the Coast Trunk Sewer has been completed from the Huntington Beach treatment plant to Golden West Street just north of Pacific Coast Highway. In the future, this major collector will be extended to Huntington Beach Mesa Bluff, then northerly to Slater Avenue where it will allow the existing Slater Pump Station to be abandoned. Future collectors will extend north in Edwards to McFadden with laterals in Heil , Edinger and McFadden Avenues. The estimated cost of the needed facilities is about $18 million. This will be ., partially offset by capacity exchanges with District No. 3 which will net the District $1.4 million from the sale of capacity in the Newland Interceptor, Coast Trunk and Knott Interceptor systems. Alignment and right-of-way acquisition studies will begin in fiscal 1986-87. It is anticipated that design of the next units of this system will be started in about 1988 and construction would be completed in about five years. Enclosed is an excerpt from the 1985-1986 budget which shows the construction schedule for the District's master planned trunk sewers, and also the summary cash flow statement which shows the projected financial condition and the funding sources for financing the District's requirements. Also enclosed is a map depicting the Coast Trunk System yet to be built. At the adjourned meeting staff will update the Directors on the District's Master Plan of Trunk Sewers to serve territories currently within the District's boundaries and developing territories that are adjacent to District No. 11's boundary using large scale maps. Staff will also review the District's financial projections. J/le/Hfi m1IIIIY SAlIl9631Cti W9➢¢CL!i). 11 �OF OI3➢IICI WRSIIR!SY91£1 PR1l® Av ect 9tta1 C.I.P. ]986-9/ 198'/-EB ]�99-fl9 1989-90 L�9bA1 ]991-92 19f293 I�iio-LiNud Maem ay ® (a) IS,WO 15,W0 Slmvt Ave. 0aP Smtlm Prltab. 25'wo 24,W0 fa) nlaml]aneme Ptv3s15 (a� 175,W0 24,W0 25,Wo S,WO u,Wo z,Wo 25.W0 M'= 99+rota1 Am fled z15,Wo 4 64.W0 m,W0 25,Wo z,OW 25,Wo 25,Wo 24.Wo FllaWa'II 13)(c) 2,930,000 2,WO,OW MPaMm 6ellet' (3)(c) Sao,= WO,WO alirt M. Mfelte M9 (3)Icl SW,Wo WO,Wo 0all Ave. Palle[a a arr (3)(c) SW,= WO,WO 44ta11e104 6a,at (3)(c) 2W,W0 31o,om MLqa�U^ PtaJa (a) M'000 `A,Wo W,WO SO,Wo W,WO W,OW W,= W,WO 9ib+IDte m Fled a,SO,Wo SO.OW W.WO SO,Wa W,WO W,Wa Sa,Wo C,EO,WO 9b+IDeal Met. a t. 4,764.W0 -0- M'wo 74,Wo 7,WO "IS,Wo 75,Wa '15,Wo 1,216,Wo 'beet Pry. t=k -9a+et- /3aadl a (3)(e) 3,M,WO z5,W0 2W,W0 2,W0,W0 EOO,Wo �§alsa T7® Mp Statlm fi Ia�m enla (3)(e)• a,aso,aW w,Wo Wo,Wo z,sdo,Wo l,Wo,00a 61ufF Mrc Seat (3)Ic)• 6,Wo,WO ]Sa,WO 3,Aa,WO z,Ao,Wo 2W,W0 Qtutnctim�(B�iahu[aeamt �) 13,415,OW 8 M,OW 240.W0 3.000,WO 3.M,= a,=,WO 2.WO.000 250,WO G7aPD 1[0AL 1B.2C0,000 � laO,Wo 324.W0 3.WS.OW 3.324,W0 a.214.W0 z.534.W0 a,524,W0 (a) EUllYy Fledad ' No]rts m m mmttu.�d by dt lcpa Wri t9ater PJs, w��vmmt Agamimt (b) Pa[t y tleddm (c) tbt Pndod 1. P r-plxt PaMlfu1 pmamittllY y udet 2 m �emeum . plmzmd Pallltl®pt, . . �Cutl�p 3. ¢edml9Nmiatc c m t -o tar rp a Pm111tta9 6/24/05 Revised 3/13/06 NOIyM 86NITATION VJSMR W. 11 SPkTNaNT Of PIOJSCT2D Ca. Path PIeLn' c sfus, 1905-06 )N . I999-90 lxx,/ LO01 mcer co 1995-86 1906-0) 1987-00 1980-89 1989-90 5-Yee[ Total ...TING FRG) I Pearson a G[[y-Me[ Ft.. test Par 2,497,000 2,206,000 1134,000 985,000 1403,000) 2.697,000 UNION, 2 Share o2 It Tax .Allocation 1,731,000 1,878,000 2,029,000 2,190,000 2,366,000 30,201,000 3 Pon,e 272,000 303,000 339,000 380,000 427,000 1,721,000 6 Interest 5 Nlswlleneme Inmmo 235,000 191,000 136,000 29,000 0 591,00. 5 Me[ .1.... 0 0 0 a 0 a 6 9t]0`d .IN 2,246,000 2.378,000 2,503,000 2,599,00, 2,713,000 12.519.000 7 SOMa OVLIIABIB IMAM. 6.763,000 4,594,000 4,237,000 3,584,000 2,310,000 15,011,000 0IP9NDI51FRY 8 ®ere el Joint Narks x a 0 2,140,000 2,346,000 2,698,000 3,103,000 31568,000 13,755,000 9 collwtlm system N 0 O and Door Open. 497,000 504,000 354,000 804,000 1,110,000 3,549,000 10 hie, sryeMimres a 0 a 0 a 11 . exPPNDITGUS 1,537,000 2,850,000 3.252.0ao 3,187,000 6.178,000 17.106.000 I2 Re..'as a c ary-Ovea as Poet Yea[ 2,206,000 1,734,000 985,000 (603,000) (2,289,0001 12,208,000) 13 kt Sear.. 0[y Po[lad verdict assu.emt. 1,269,000 11,25,000 1.126.000 1,994,000 2,331,000 2.339.000 l6 Prod nalsxe er (Oe01ct,) 9l].000 309.000 I6LL,0001 (2.393.000) 14,127,000) 14,127,000) CMIW. POA956) 15 Nee[ves 5 G[.ybve[ gam rase Yea. ].)53,000 0.846.000 91085,000 10,720,000 9,926,000 ).)53,000 RRVBNDR 16 cbutrucraft Grants 401,000 23,000 1,m 21,000 39e,000 ]]2,000 1] ease, cons- atlon 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 3,790,000 IB OWer 86,000 98,000 113,000 121,000 148,000 171,... 19 sale a2 Capacity Rights 118,000 58,000 69,000 1,013,000 1,663,000 2,900,000 20 I.rdoat 6 monallmndu. Ircar 012,000 894,000 980,000 1,030,000 1,067,000 4,))1,000 31 Pointy pale on District 11 1.438.000 1,439,000 2,8]],400 22 Plw-gesad ¢sully Mjustsent 126,000 a 0 0 0 326,000 23 Me, Inc. 23,000 300.000 2,050,000 31100,000 4,050,000 10,123,000 26� iGGL RR9MR 4,234,000 3,362,000 1.712.000 6,043,000 ).602.000 26,013,000 23 . RVRIWIG FINDING 11,987,000 12,209,000 13,857,000 16,713,000 17,606,000 33,646,000 9RPDIDI9MRd 26 Shire o8 Joint Wora Treatment Plant 2,369,000 2,903,000 2,012,000 3,612,000 3,071,000 14,867,000 27 District Ibllwtlm system 216,000 140,000 325,000 3,075,000 3,325,00. 71001,000 28 Nindarrawnt Agreement Infant. 556.00o 0 0 150,000 150,000 $56,000 29 plow-ba"d Unity mjusment o 0 a 0 0 0 30 tenet mpenaitures a 0 0 0 0 0 31 90OL p1PWSITOR89 I.161.eoo 1.123,000 3,137,000 6.837,000 6.546.0.0 22,784,000 32 ....... 6 Ca[[ybro[ t0 at Yea. 8,846,000 91.85,000 10.720,000 9,926,000 11,062,000 11,012,000 SOD PRG)(8) 33 pse ran. 6 Car"-Jar P[a. Lest Yee[ 62,000 65,000 42,000 82.000 66.900 62,000 Union CE 18 Tu levy 51,000 65,000 65,000 65.000 65,000 311,000 35 Interest 6 Niew Ilmema Imvme 51000 6,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 22,000 31 Me, Lame 0 0 a 0 a 0 37 TOINAL anded a 56,000 69,000 69,000 11,000 7e.000 333,000 30 lOant nv61Wu MG)ING 118.a00 dins.. 111 000 111.000 118.000 395,008 B.P0DIT0R[R 39 bnd h Ins 1pel 5 Interest ]1,000 72,000 69,000 6],000 67,000 34s,000 60 blot C@sMltaro 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 9MRL 6vlSDI9R1B9 73jOO 72,000 69,000 67,000 67.000 348.000 83 Use ran L Crry-Ove[ as Next Year 65,000 62,000 82,000 88.000 87.000 47,000 63 Next P ar•s by Po[l.9 Funding Rpul[eomt. 45,000 42,000 82,000 66.000 47.000 87.000 88 Fad Balance or ICeficlt) 0 0 0 0 a 0 a. (M3Wted 2w Inteo-FYad ..far.) 65 ....... 6 co.".r Pram last Yes[ 10,312,000 11,097,000 10,661.000 11,]I),000 9.517,000 10,312,000 86 TOID.L .Na 5,099,000 4,370,000 ).144.000 8.711.000 10,545,000 38,915,000 87 A'AL iselusB PatG)1. 15,410,000 15,467,000 1812051000 20,450,000 20,I12,000 11,257,000 ,a,.,/ lO2AL 6RPDDIMNd 5.751.000 610,51000 6.150.000 10.093.000 11,211,000 10,436,000 69 9esa.vee 9 carry-O-r to Next Year 9.659,000 9,421,000 ll,)61,000 9,567,000 8,921,000 8,821,000 50 yxt Yea.•. by M.IOd rual,g Gaulrewnts 11314,000 1.66].000 1.66s.000 2.e19.000 21386,000 2,306,000 51 . .0 OR 108PICIPI 9,345,000 7.953,000 10,079,000 ].529.000 6. 909.000 6.635.000 � I nwan,t ninon —�' i PROPOSED " 1 c" L - COAST TRUNK - -n COLLECTION SYSTEM A _t . I - IN NEW PUMP STATION I L_ LEGEND - OISTRICT NC. II SOUNOARY PROPOSED SYSTEM DEFICIENCY CORRECTIONS Z... f f Pwf • �.flV,� lYpEaA 5'. �CITYA. HIyIVTINGTO BEACH ", Y �] l+ >� PF,C 0 µ i =.COMMUNICATION Iln1AKIM KKN t�'!: lf(1� j A}; ,f Y f j6G • .... TO MAYOR `1ANDICI,OISTRICT;y 0 . :u FROM COUNCILWOMAOnUTI, BAILE`. ALL CITY COUNCILME:IBERS and 'CBARLES W SUWJJ( }VSON, City Administrator , DATE March 6, 1986 SPECIAL NEETINC DISTRICT #11 O.C. SANITATION DISTRICT - As Chairman of Orange County . Sanitation District 511,,- Zwould like 'to announce a special meeting of the ,District, presbaikekby District '.'staff, for the purpose of reviewing ,master plans .p` f'1`sewers that affect t`ie city. - . The meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, March 19 at 3: 30 -P.M.- in Room B-7. 'If the entire council would be interested in attending, we could adjourn to this time. This 'will be public meeting.'`- RSB:bb -t e e < e i .?•,EMT r3� �zL. ^.� S#�„� -S ?• � � 2 it t , .sue . ?` a't,cNMI j t. a'3„etrv" tr}i ` E�k .._. _ MEETING OATS M3rCh 19, 1986 TIME 3:30 P.M-DISTRICTS 11 - Bmtington Beach City Hall DISTRI=T 1 JOINT BOARDS (CRANK)........HANSON......� (HAND[:).........SAIL_Y...... (SALTARELLI)..•MOESTEREY..._ (MURPHY).........BEVERAGE...._ (LUXIMBOURGER).GRISET......� (ZIEGLER7........BUCK........_ _ (WIEDEi).......STANi]N....._ (NORSY)..........CATLIN...... � (PERRY)..........CULVER...... (SALTAR DISTRI:i 2 (REESE)... .....GRIFFIN..... (MORBY)........CATLIN......_ _ _ (LUXEMBOURGER)...GRISET...... (ZIEGLSR)......BUCK........_ (CRANK)..........HANSON...... (LUXEMSOURGER7.GRI5ET......_ _ (COX)............MART........ (5112EL).......KAWANAMI...._ _ _ (SALTARELLI)....•HOESTEREY..._ _ (WEDEL)........MAHONEY..... (SILZEL).........KAWANAMI...._ (BEVERAGE).....MURPHY...... (WEDEL)..........MAHONEY..... (SCOTT)........MEAL........ (COX)....... .... .MAUREA...... _ (CULVER).......PERRY....... (BAKER)..........MILLER...... (OVERHOLT).....ROTH........ (BEVERAGE).......MURPNY...... (SEVER)........SMITH......._ (SCOTT)....:.....NEAL........ _ (AZEDER).......STANTON..... (SUTTON)... .....NELSON...... _ (NELSON).......SUTTON...... (LACAY'J).........PARTIN...... _ (CULVER).........PERRY....... _ DISTRICT 3 (COX)............PLUMMER..... _ (NELSON).........POLLS....... (OVERHOLT).....ROTH........� _ _ (WIEDER).........RILEY....... (SUTTON).......NELSON...... _ _ (BROWNELL)......•RISNER...... (MANDI^_).......BAILEY......_ (OVERHOLT).......ROTH........ (HORSY)........CATLIN...... (PACE)...........SAPIEN...... (PERRY)........CULVER...... (WILES)..........SIE_FEN...... (RESSE)........6A[FFIx..L.._ (BEYER)..........SMITH....... (- NEMBOURGER).GRISET......_ (WIEDER).........STANT3M..... (WEDEL)........"HONEY....._ _ _ (NELSON).........SUTTON...... (SCOTT)........NEAL........ (MILLER).........SWAN........ _ (LACAY7).......PARTIN...... (SELVAGGI).......SYLVIA...... _ (NELSON).......POLLS ...... (FINLEY).........THOMAS...... (BROWNELL).....RISHER...... (GALLACMER/GREEN)WAMMER......_ (PACE).........SAPIEM...... (WILE S)........SIE_FEM...... (WIE_DER).......STRNTON....._ (SELVAGGI).....SYLVIA...... STAFF: DISTRICT 5 SYLVESTER... ✓ v CLARKE......_ — — (COX)..........HART........_ DAWES.......JC (COX)..........MAURER...... ANDERSON.... (WIEDER).......5TANT7N....._ _ _ BU%ER......JG BROWN.......JC DISTRICT 6 BAKER....... KYLE........ (GALLACHEA)....WANNER......_ _ _ VON LANGEN _ (COX)..........PLUMMER..... WINSOR...... (WIEDER).......STANTON..... _ _ $TREED......Z CLAWSON..... DISTRICT 7 oo TSN......._ LINGER...... (BAKER)........EDGAR MILLER......_ (BU(ER)........MILLER......_ (COX)..........MAIRER......_ (C0X1..........NAURER...... OTHERS: WOODRUFF.............. (WIEDER).......STANTON..... _ _ HOWARD........... ........WANNER...... XEIT........ DISTRICT 11 KNOPF....... KE BLANC....� (WINO[[).......BAILEY...... _ _ LE BLAME...._ (FINLEY).......STATHOMTON AS...... LINCH... 1... (FINLEY) _ LYNCX......._ MEARCE...... WOUNG....... _ (NELSON).......BEVERAGE SUTTON...... _ YOUNG......_ ' (NELSON).......ROTH........ (OVCRxOLT).....ROTM........_ (WffiOEA STANTON..... DISTRICT lA v (BAKER)........MILLER...... _ L a (MILLER).......SWAN........_ (SALTARELLI)...EDGAR.......= _ _ (WIEDER).......RILEY......._ _ _ (WIEDER).......STANTON....._ _ _ 02/13/86 MARCH 19, 1986 ADJOURNED DISTRICT 11 MTG. NOTES #2 - Status report on District's Master Plan of Sewers The General Manager called on the District's Director of Engineering, Tom Dawes, v to report on the District's Master Plan of Sewers to serve developing territories in and adjacent to the District. Tan briefly reviewed the history of the formation of the Sanitation Districts. He said in the 1940's the Board of Supervisors had a survey made of Orange County and proposed that 10 Districts be formed. Before the Sanitation Districts were formed, there were a number of small plants. After the Sanitation Districts were formed, most of the small sewer districts went out of business. Most of the areas require pumping to get to the Districts' system. The southeast section of the city was served by a sewer that brought the flow into the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer built in 1959 owned by District 3. District 11 shared in the cost of the Miller-Holder Sewer and it was always planned that someday District 11 would have its van sewage collection system and sell the capacity back to District 3. In the last 6 years the District has built the Coast Trunk Sewer fran Treatment Plant No. 2 to the Golden West Street just north of Pacific Coast Highway. When that was built, water that formerly went to District 3 was brought into District Ills system. The pump station was able to be taken out after the Coast Trunk was built. All of the southeast part of Huntington Beach is now serve] by the gravity Coast Trunk Sewer. The northwest portion of Huntington Beach is now served by the main collector sewers in Springdale and Golden West Streets. They drain to the pump station between Golden West and Gothard. It pumps water up in Slater and drains into the Knott Interceptor at Newland. The Knott Interceptor was built by District 3 but District 11 did participate in that cost base] on the capacity they needed. It now pumps about 8 mad. The rest of the sewers drain about 9 mad for a total of 17 m3d. Two other areas are connected through the bluffs on the west side of the Huntington Beach Mesa. The Slater Pump Station was built as an interim measure for a period that has already been reached. Wat is planned is to extend a sewer through the Seacliff area to the bluffs--Bluff Trunk Sewer--and build a new pump station—Bolsa Chica Pump Station--which would allow all of this area to go to the Coast Trunk Sewer to Plant 2. There are a couple of advantages. It's the least amount of pumping that can be done. Will have a lower lift and require less energy that than the existing pump station which was built about 20 years ago and is largely at capacity now. The ultimate plan is to extend this sewer through Palm Avenue to about Slater and send an interceptor to the pump station and in the future extend that interceptor up Edwards. Also referred to recent correspondence re providing sewers to Springdale. Ton said this plan has been studied several times since 1959 but the basic plan has pretty much stayed in tact. Charles Thompson asked if the District uses the City's land use plan? TMD replied, yes, exclusively. TbD mentioned the mesa area bounded by Garfield, Talbert and just about to Beach and Edwards. This portion of District 3 drains to District 11 and is served by them. From Ellis to Garfield drains to the Newland-Delaware Trunk and Ellis north drains to the Slater Pump Station. If the Slater Pump Station was to be rebuilt, it would be quite a job. He said we are concerned about the level of `� development that is proposed by the Huntington Beach Canpany and Mola Development. This area in District 3 is served by the Slater Pump Station in District 11. The Newland-Delaware system is in a little better shape but it too is reaching its limit. Most of the area is fully developed. Medium density is proposed. Both City and County staff have indicated that this is a very important area and is not to be intruded on by a lot of development. Bob Mandic stated that the east border of the Linear Regional Park is the subject of ... controversy by the City right now but the west boundry is pretty much established. Tam said we would like the punp station to be at the base of the park but the County staff suggested that it should be at the proposed extension of Garfield. He indicated that the staff was not there to rexmmnd any alignment at this time. Will study this with the City, land owners and developers. The General Manager commented that the Districts had a similar situation in District 5 at the Upper Newport Bay. Wa put in sewers and actually improved the wetland area. Mardic said anything we could do back there would be an improvement. Tan Dawes stated that the Bolas Chica development is not in District 11 nor in any Sanitation District at this time. He added that about three years ago the Sanitation Districts entered into an agreement with the County of orange which led to the formation of District No. 13 which receives no tax revenue. All of the island areas in Orange County were included as part of the agreement. The agreement was very specific about Bolas Chico. It was not included as part of the agreement because they could not care to any kind of agreement on that area. To annex to District No. 11 is the most obvious way Bolas Chico could receive sewer service. A big issue would be whether or not there would be a tax exchange between the County and the Sanitation Districts. Bolas Chica cannot be developed without the construction of major new facilities which are part of the District 11 Master Plan. The facilities must be built even without Bolas. Chico to take the pump station out of service, but Bolas Chica cannot be developer] �.s without these facilities! The Coast Trunk Sewer was sized contemplating drainage of the Bolas Chica area and it has the capacity. This plan must start within five years. The Hoke Chica area could be sswered in conjunction with City's Master Plan or sewer could be built along the east-west corridor and a number of City pump stations could be abandoned. The size of the new pipe from Golden West to the pump station will be about 54 inches and about 51-54 inches all the way to Slater. The Hoke Chica Pub Station would have an average daily capacity fo 12 mgd. Very large pump station. All relief lines should be implemented by the year 2000. A total of about $18 million worth of construction will be required in District 11. John Thomas asked about how much of this $18 million would the developers have to put back into the District. TMD answered that for just the Hoke Chica area, if annexed to District 11, there are about 5700 hams for a total of $10 million. We should start looking at the area in District 3 being served by District 11 also to get sore revenue out of it. That area pays $250 per house connection charge to District 3 and in District 11 the connection charge is $1250. Wayne Sylvester added that the District 11 does have an agreement with District 3 for the joint use of those facilities. Staff is starting to take a look at the best long-range plan for those facilities. If we were going to reorganize Districts 3 and 11, then that would be the key issue—what is the revenue base as opposed to the cost of service. It would have to be acceptable to both District 3 and District 11. Benefit must equal cost of service. -2- Tan Dawes added that when this area drains into the Coast Trunk Sewer, District 11 can sell back the capacity in the Knott Interceptor and interplant line. That will generate about $1.4 million. There is an existing formula for the buy-back. Cast of capacity is based on current value. JWS then referred to the financial aspect of this required construction projects and the schedules enclosed with the Directors agenda material. They give the staff's best projections over the next several years as to how these facilities will be built in terms of timing and costs. A cash flaw summery for District No. 11 was also included. He reviewed lines 1-14 showing income and expenditures for financing operating costs of the District, which includes the District's share of operating and maintaining the treatment facilities in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach and the cost of operating and maintaining the trunk sewer system. The second major expenditure is the capital funds on lines 15-32 and it is how we finance the capital requirements of the Districts and includes both the District's share of the treatment plant expansion work and trunk sewer Master Plan system. Lines 33-44 represent the retirement of bond funds currently outstanding and will be paid off within the next 5 years. Mr. Sylvester then asked Bill Butler, the District's Director of Finance to review the capital financing of the major trunk sewer program. Bob Mandic asked why the carry-over was so high? JWS explained that we do our financing on a long-term basis for the treatment plant program and construction of Master Plan sewers. The Districts' policy is to finance capital improvements on a pay-as-you-go basis and must acou[mnulate funds during a 5-20 year period. Bill Butler reported that the major portion of the construction program outlined by Tan Dawes is for three projects totaling $13.5 million: (1) the Coast Trunk Sewer (2) the Bolas Chica Punp Station and (3) the Bluff Trunk Sewer. We are proposing, as in the past, to finance them with agreements with developers to put up the money and we then reimbursement them fran connection fees. Will need $2.85 mullion upfront coney from developers to construct facilities (line 23). The collection system projects are shown for 7 years while the cash flow is for only 5 years so there is still another $2.75 million not shown on the cash flaw for the other two years. In January District 14 was formed and as part of this formation, Irvine Ranch Water District purchased capacity in the joint treatment works worth $34 million. Have received $17 million this year and will receive $17 mullion next year. $2.9 million is District 11's share for this year. Overall we will be able to, with the support of developers, have sufficient capital funds to complete the system TMD described. The operating fund is not in as good as shape as the capital fund. In 1987-88 it might find itself in a deficit position. Districts 1, 5, and 6 have supplemental user fees and District 13 is financed 100% by user fees. District 11 may find itself in a similar position. Prior to implementing a user fee program, in the past we have taken capital monies that are in reserve and moved then into the operating fund to delay the supplemental user fee implementation. %e could cane back in the next 3-5 years and suggest that District 11 needs to go to a user fee. Districts 1, 5 and 6 presently collect $26.50 per year on the property tax roll as a separate line item. We have been able to hold the line on that fee and have not had to push it up on a routine basis by holding the operating costs dawn. Overall the District has a balance of $6.4 million. By planning for 5-7 years it allows us to stay ahead of financial requirements and don't end up with any surpluses and can keep Directors informed. This balance does not include implementation of a sewer use fee. He mentioned also that new District 14 will be totally financed by the Irvine Ranch Water District which is financed by user fees. District 5 was the first District to establish a user fee in 1981. -3- The General Manager explained that the coastal Districts experience financial difficulties faster than other Districts because their costs are high because we have to pimp all of the facilities to get to the treatment plants. Our approach has been very conservative in projecting their financial position. Staff would rather project the worse scenario. He referred to line 14 which showed a negative situation and stated that unless some major that is not foreseen happens, we world expect that situation would not occur because of their conservative financial projections. In 1985-86 (line 45) the total carry-over in term of reserves this year was $10.3 million. On line 51 for 1989-90 it shows $6.4 million. With regard to our share of ad valorem taxes, we get about 38 of the 18 allocation. Depending upon how fast property turns over, line 2 will reflect a higher revenue as the property will be revalued and this will increase property tax revenue for all public agencies. New development will also affect that. That will forestall a user fee also. Mr. Sylvester state that the staff would continue to work and cooperate with the City staff on our mutual sewerage needs. He expressed appreciation to the City staff for their cooperation. The City also indicated how nuch they enjoyed working with the Districts' staff. Barth Bailey asked what needed to be done to annex the Bolsa Chica area to District 11 and the District 3 area? JWS explained that the first thing is for the staff to do a study relative to sewesing the area and compare the tax financial base. Then they would present that information to the Boards of Districts 3 and ll. Charles Thompson asked if staff predicted a negative result for District 11 and was told we didn't know and that is why a study needed to be done. If appropriate, a reorganization through IAFCD would have to be approved. It would require 'notices to all property owners and a public hearing. If enough people protested, it would require an election. The Bolsa (mica area would be an annexation to District ll and would be a IAFOD process also. The annexation request would came from the property owner. A question was asked regarding what the Signal landmark people could do besides annex to the Sanitation Districts? There are three alternatives: (1) Annex to District ll which would be a District ll decision. (2) Form anew District which world be a Joint Boards decision. (3) Ask to be served by contract which would be a Joint Boards decision. Director John Thomas then moved that the staff be directed to contdmmie to study the best means of serving the Hoke Chica area and the area tributary to the Coast Trunk Sewer and Newland-Delaware Sewer systems which said territory is currently outside the District boundary. Ruth Bailey seconded the motion. Motion carried. It was explained that of the $1,250 connection fee, $1,000 of it goes to repay the developer, Mansion Properties. They will be paid off in one more payment but the same process would be used for the future construction projects so this fee will not be decreased. -4- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING March 19, 1986 - 3:30 P.M. 2000 Main Street - Room B7 V Huntington Beach, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of March 12, 1986, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in- the Huntington Beach City Hall. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Ruth Bailey, Chairman, John Thomas DIRECTORS ABSENT: Roger Stanton STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Thomas M. Dawes, William H. Butler, Rita Brown, Gary Streed OTHERS PRESENT: Bob Mandic, Ruth Finley, Charles Thompson, Les Evans, Paul Cook, Bill Patapoff, Connie Brockway Status report on District's Master The staff reviewed the status of the Plan of Sewers to serve developing District's present sewerage facilities territories in and adjacent to the and those master planned to be District constructed within the next five years to serve the developing territories in and adjacent to the District. The District has been constructing the Coast Trunk Sewer in segments for the last several years. This will provide the needed capacity for the District and, when completed, will direct major flows from the existing collection system, which partially utilizes District No. 3 facilities, to the Coast Trunk Sewer. To date, the Coast Trunk Sewer has been completed from the Huntington Beach treatment plant to Golden West Street just north of Pacific Coast Highway. All of the southeastern section of Huntington Beach is now being served by this new gravity sewer. In the future, this major collector will be extended to Huntington Beach Mesa Bluff, then northerly to Slater Avenue where it will allow the existing Slater Pump Station, which was built as an interim measure, to be abandoned. Future collectors will extend north in Edwards to McFadden with laterals in Heil, Edinger and McFadden Avenues. It was noted that all projections for future sewerage requirements were based on the City's land use plans. The staff further reviewed preliminary plans for a new pump station which would have a lower lift and, therefore, require less energy than the �..� existing pump station which was built over 20 years ago. -1- 03/19/86 The Directors and staff entered into a lengthy discussion relative to proposed development and sewerage needs of the Bolsa Chica area. It was pointed out that the proposed construction of major new facilities which are part of the District No. 11 Master Plan must be completed whether or not Bolsa Chica is developed, but Bolas Chica cannot be developed without these facilities. The Coast Trunk Sewer was sized contemplating drainage from the Bolsa Chica area and does have the necessary capacity. There are three options available in order to provide sewerage service to the Bolsa Chica area: (1) Annex to District No. 11 (2) Form a new Sanitation District (3) Contract with the Sanitation Districts for sewage service The staff also reviewed provisions for sewerage service to areas in Huntington Beach that are not now in District No. 11 but are served by District No. 11's Newland-Delaware and Coast Trunk Sewer systems through an agreement with District No. 3. The total estimated cost of the new facilities required to serve developing territories in and adjacent to District No. 11 is about $18 million. This will be partially offset by capacity exchanges with District No. 3 which will net the District $1.4 million from the sale of capacity in the Newland-Delaware Trunk, Coast Trunk and Knott Interceptor systems. Alignment and right-of-way acquisition studies will begin in fiscal year 1986-87, It is anticipated that design of the next units of this system will begin in about 1988 and construction would be completed in about five years. The Director of Finance then reviewed projected financial information used to help determine the schedule for completion of the proposed sewer improvements. The District must accummulate the necessary funds over a period of several years in order to continue the Districts' policy of financing capital improvements on a pay-as-you-go basis. The District will also continue its policy of entering into reimbursement agreements with developers to obtain the necessary advance payments required to begin the construction projects to serve those territories. Within the next three to five years, District No. 11 may need to consider establishing a supplemental user fee program similar to those previously adopted by Districts Nos. 1, 5 and 6. It was explained that the coastal Districts experience financial difficulties sooner than the other Sanitation Districts because of the high cost of pumping required to transport the wastewater to the treatment plants. Directing staff to study best means It was moved, seconded and duly carried: of serving the Bolas Chica area and area tributary to the Coast Trunk That the staff be, and is hereby, and Newland-Delaware Sewer systems directed to continue to study the best means of providing sewerage service to the Bolas Chica area and the area tributary to the Coast Trunk Sewer and the Newland-Delaware Sewer systems which are currently outside District No. 11's boundary, and to report back to the Boards. Secretary, Board 6f Directors County Sanitation District No. 11 -2- EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., March 12, 1986, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 3:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 19, 1986, at the Huntington Beach City Hall. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:42 p.m. , March 12, 1986. r.' STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of minute entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 12thday of March, 1986. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of March, 1986. Secretary of he Board. of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14