HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-03-19 COUNTY SANITATION 'DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10814 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708.7018
(714(982.2411
March 13, 1986
NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICT NO. 11
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 1986 - 3: 30 P.M.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY HALL
2000 Main Street - Room B7
Huntington Beach, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of March 12,
1986, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 11 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting to be held
at the above hour and date to review long-term financing of
the District ' s capital and operating requirements.
Secretary
V
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts Peat Offim Box 8127
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
' Telephones:
rco A Coda 714
D►sTR►CT No. 11 9540-29 6226I1
AGENDA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 1986 - 3:30 P.M.
Huntington Beach City Hall
2000 Main Street - Room B7
Huntington Beach, California
(1) Roll call
'..✓ (2) Status Report on District's Master Plan of Sewers
to serve developing territories in and adjacent
to the District
(3) Review of long-term financing of the District's
capital and operating requirements
(4) Other business and communications, if any
(5) Consideration of motion to adjourn
i
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
Gast Office Box 8127
County a County, Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Talepl•mas:
Arno Code 714
DISTRICT NO. a62-2-2411
1 1 54011
MEETING DATE
MARCH 19, 1986 AT 3:30 P.M.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY HALL
For the past several years, the District has been constructing the Coast Trunk
Sewer in segments which will provide the needed capacity for the District and,
when completed, will direct major flows from the existing collection system
which partially utilizes District No. 3 facilities. To date, the Coast Trunk
Sewer has been completed from the Huntington Beach treatment plant to Golden
West Street just north of Pacific Coast Highway. In the future, this major
collector will be extended to Huntington Beach Mesa Bluff, then northerly to
Slater Avenue where it will allow the existing Slater Pump Station to be
abandoned. Future collectors will extend north in Edwards to McFadden with
laterals in Heil , Edinger and McFadden Avenues.
The estimated cost of the needed facilities is about $18 million. This will be
., partially offset by capacity exchanges with District No. 3 which will net the
District $1.4 million from the sale of capacity in the Newland Interceptor,
Coast Trunk and Knott Interceptor systems. Alignment and right-of-way
acquisition studies will begin in fiscal 1986-87. It is anticipated that design
of the next units of this system will be started in about 1988 and construction
would be completed in about five years.
Enclosed is an excerpt from the 1985-1986 budget which shows the construction
schedule for the District's master planned trunk sewers, and also the summary
cash flow statement which shows the projected financial condition and the
funding sources for financing the District's requirements. Also enclosed is a
map depicting the Coast Trunk System yet to be built. At the adjourned meeting
staff will update the Directors on the District's Master Plan of Trunk Sewers to
serve territories currently within the District's boundaries and developing
territories that are adjacent to District No. 11's boundary using large scale
maps. Staff will also review the District's financial projections.
J/le/Hfi
m1IIIIY SAlIl9631Cti W9➢¢CL!i). 11
�OF OI3➢IICI WRSIIR!SY91£1 PR1l®
Av ect 9tta1 C.I.P. ]986-9/ 198'/-EB ]�99-fl9 1989-90 L�9bA1 ]991-92 19f293
I�iio-LiNud Maem ay ® (a) IS,WO 15,W0
Slmvt Ave. 0aP Smtlm Prltab. 25'wo 24,W0
fa)
nlaml]aneme Ptv3s15 (a� 175,W0 24,W0 25,Wo S,WO u,Wo z,Wo 25.W0 M'=
99+rota1 Am fled
z15,Wo 4 64.W0 m,W0 25,Wo z,OW 25,Wo 25,Wo 24.Wo
FllaWa'II 13)(c) 2,930,000 2,WO,OW
MPaMm 6ellet' (3)(c) Sao,= WO,WO
alirt M. Mfelte M9 (3)Icl SW,Wo WO,Wo
0all Ave. Palle[a a arr (3)(c) SW,= WO,WO
44ta11e104 6a,at (3)(c) 2W,W0 31o,om
MLqa�U^ PtaJa (a) M'000 `A,Wo W,WO SO,Wo W,WO W,OW W,= W,WO
9ib+IDte m Fled
a,SO,Wo SO.OW W.WO SO,Wa W,WO W,Wa Sa,Wo C,EO,WO
9b+IDeal Met. a t.
4,764.W0 -0- M'wo 74,Wo 7,WO "IS,Wo 75,Wa '15,Wo 1,216,Wo
'beet Pry. t=k -9a+et-
/3aadl a (3)(e) 3,M,WO z5,W0 2W,W0 2,W0,W0 EOO,Wo
�§alsa T7® Mp Statlm fi
Ia�m enla (3)(e)• a,aso,aW w,Wo Wo,Wo z,sdo,Wo l,Wo,00a
61ufF Mrc Seat (3)Ic)• 6,Wo,WO ]Sa,WO 3,Aa,WO z,Ao,Wo 2W,W0
Qtutnctim�(B�iahu[aeamt
�) 13,415,OW 8 M,OW 240.W0 3.000,WO 3.M,= a,=,WO 2.WO.000 250,WO
G7aPD 1[0AL
1B.2C0,000 � laO,Wo 324.W0 3.WS.OW 3.324,W0 a.214.W0 z.534.W0 a,524,W0
(a) EUllYy Fledad ' No]rts m m mmttu.�d by dt lcpa Wri t9ater PJs, w��vmmt Agamimt
(b) Pa[t y tleddm
(c) tbt Pndod 1. P r-plxt PaMlfu1 pmamittllY y udet
2 m �emeum
. plmzmd Pallltl®pt, . . �Cutl�p
3. ¢edml9Nmiatc c m
t -o tar rp a Pm111tta9
6/24/05
Revised 3/13/06
NOIyM 86NITATION VJSMR W. 11
SPkTNaNT Of PIOJSCT2D Ca. Path
PIeLn' c sfus, 1905-06 )N . I999-90
lxx,/
LO01 mcer co 1995-86 1906-0) 1987-00 1980-89 1989-90 5-Yee[ Total
...TING FRG)
I Pearson a G[[y-Me[ Ft.. test Par 2,497,000 2,206,000 1134,000 985,000 1403,000) 2.697,000
UNION,
2 Share o2 It Tax .Allocation 1,731,000 1,878,000 2,029,000 2,190,000 2,366,000 30,201,000
3 Pon,e 272,000 303,000 339,000 380,000 427,000 1,721,000
6 Interest 5 Nlswlleneme Inmmo 235,000 191,000 136,000 29,000 0 591,00.
5 Me[ .1.... 0 0 0 a 0 a
6 9t]0`d .IN 2,246,000 2.378,000 2,503,000 2,599,00, 2,713,000 12.519.000
7 SOMa OVLIIABIB IMAM. 6.763,000 4,594,000 4,237,000 3,584,000 2,310,000 15,011,000
0IP9NDI51FRY
8 ®ere el Joint Narks x a 0 2,140,000 2,346,000 2,698,000 3,103,000 31568,000 13,755,000
9 collwtlm system N 0 O and Door Open. 497,000 504,000 354,000 804,000 1,110,000 3,549,000
10 hie, sryeMimres a 0 a 0 a
11 . exPPNDITGUS 1,537,000 2,850,000 3.252.0ao 3,187,000 6.178,000 17.106.000
I2 Re..'as a c ary-Ovea as Poet Yea[ 2,206,000 1,734,000 985,000 (603,000) (2,289,0001 12,208,000)
13 kt Sear.. 0[y Po[lad verdict assu.emt. 1,269,000 11,25,000 1.126.000 1,994,000 2,331,000 2.339.000
l6 Prod nalsxe er (Oe01ct,) 9l].000 309.000 I6LL,0001 (2.393.000) 14,127,000) 14,127,000)
CMIW. POA956)
15 Nee[ves 5 G[.ybve[ gam rase Yea. ].)53,000 0.846.000 91085,000 10,720,000 9,926,000 ).)53,000
RRVBNDR
16 cbutrucraft Grants 401,000 23,000 1,m 21,000 39e,000 ]]2,000
1] ease, cons- atlon 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 3,790,000
IB OWer 86,000 98,000 113,000 121,000 148,000 171,...
19 sale a2 Capacity Rights 118,000 58,000 69,000 1,013,000 1,663,000 2,900,000
20 I.rdoat 6 monallmndu. Ircar 012,000 894,000 980,000 1,030,000 1,067,000 4,))1,000
31 Pointy pale on District 11 1.438.000 1,439,000 2,8]],400
22 Plw-gesad ¢sully Mjustsent 126,000 a 0 0 0 326,000
23 Me, Inc. 23,000 300.000 2,050,000 31100,000 4,050,000 10,123,000
26� iGGL RR9MR 4,234,000 3,362,000 1.712.000 6,043,000 ).602.000 26,013,000
23 . RVRIWIG FINDING 11,987,000 12,209,000 13,857,000 16,713,000 17,606,000 33,646,000
9RPDIDI9MRd
26 Shire o8 Joint Wora Treatment Plant 2,369,000 2,903,000 2,012,000 3,612,000 3,071,000 14,867,000
27 District Ibllwtlm system 216,000 140,000 325,000 3,075,000 3,325,00. 71001,000
28 Nindarrawnt Agreement Infant. 556.00o 0 0 150,000 150,000 $56,000
29 plow-ba"d Unity mjusment o 0 a 0 0 0
30 tenet mpenaitures a 0 0 0 0 0
31 90OL p1PWSITOR89 I.161.eoo 1.123,000 3,137,000 6.837,000 6.546.0.0 22,784,000
32 ....... 6 Ca[[ybro[ t0 at Yea. 8,846,000 91.85,000 10.720,000 9,926,000 11,062,000 11,012,000
SOD PRG)(8)
33 pse ran. 6 Car"-Jar P[a. Lest Yee[ 62,000 65,000 42,000 82.000 66.900 62,000
Union CE
18 Tu levy 51,000 65,000 65,000 65.000 65,000 311,000
35 Interest 6 Niew Ilmema Imvme 51000 6,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 22,000
31 Me, Lame 0 0 a 0 a 0
37 TOINAL anded a 56,000 69,000 69,000 11,000 7e.000 333,000
30 lOant nv61Wu MG)ING 118.a00 dins.. 111 000 111.000 118.000 395,008
B.P0DIT0R[R
39 bnd h Ins 1pel 5 Interest ]1,000 72,000 69,000 6],000 67,000 34s,000
60 blot C@sMltaro 0 0 0 0 0 0
81 9MRL 6vlSDI9R1B9 73jOO 72,000 69,000 67,000 67.000 348.000
83 Use ran L Crry-Ove[ as Next Year 65,000 62,000 82,000 88.000 87.000 47,000
63 Next P ar•s by Po[l.9 Funding Rpul[eomt. 45,000 42,000 82,000 66.000 47.000 87.000
88 Fad Balance or ICeficlt) 0 0 0 0 a 0
a. (M3Wted 2w Inteo-FYad ..far.)
65 ....... 6 co.".r Pram last Yes[ 10,312,000 11,097,000 10,661.000 11,]I),000 9.517,000 10,312,000
86 TOID.L .Na 5,099,000 4,370,000 ).144.000 8.711.000 10,545,000 38,915,000
87 A'AL iselusB PatG)1. 15,410,000 15,467,000 1812051000 20,450,000 20,I12,000 11,257,000
,a,.,/ lO2AL 6RPDDIMNd 5.751.000 610,51000 6.150.000 10.093.000 11,211,000 10,436,000
69 9esa.vee 9 carry-O-r to Next Year 9.659,000 9,421,000 ll,)61,000 9,567,000 8,921,000 8,821,000
50 yxt Yea.•. by M.IOd rual,g Gaulrewnts 11314,000 1.66].000 1.66s.000 2.e19.000 21386,000 2,306,000
51 . .0 OR 108PICIPI 9,345,000 7.953,000 10,079,000 ].529.000 6. 909.000 6.635.000
� I
nwan,t ninon —�'
i PROPOSED
" 1 c" L - COAST TRUNK
- -n
COLLECTION SYSTEM
A _t .
I -
IN
NEW
PUMP STATION
I L_
LEGEND -
OISTRICT NC. II SOUNOARY
PROPOSED SYSTEM
DEFICIENCY CORRECTIONS
Z...
f f
Pwf • �.flV,� lYpEaA 5'.
�CITYA. HIyIVTINGTO BEACH ",
Y �] l+ >� PF,C 0 µ i =.COMMUNICATION
Iln1AKIM KKN t�'!: lf(1� j A}; ,f Y f j6G • ....
TO MAYOR `1ANDICI,OISTRICT;y 0 . :u FROM
COUNCILWOMAOnUTI, BAILE`.
ALL CITY COUNCILME:IBERS and 'CBARLES W
SUWJJ( }VSON, City Administrator , DATE March 6, 1986
SPECIAL NEETINC DISTRICT #11
O.C. SANITATION DISTRICT -
As Chairman of Orange County . Sanitation District 511,,- Zwould like
'to announce a special meeting of the ,District, presbaikekby District
'.'staff, for the purpose of reviewing ,master plans .p` f'1`sewers that
affect t`ie city.
- . The meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, March 19 at 3: 30 -P.M.-
in Room B-7. 'If the entire council would be interested in attending,
we could adjourn to this time. This 'will be public meeting.'`-
RSB:bb
-t
e e
< e i .?•,EMT r3� �zL. ^.� S#�„� -S ?• � � 2
it
t , .sue . ?`
a't,cNMI
j t. a'3„etrv" tr}i ` E�k .._. _
MEETING OATS M3rCh 19, 1986 TIME 3:30 P.M-DISTRICTS 11 - Bmtington Beach City Hall
DISTRI=T 1 JOINT BOARDS
(CRANK)........HANSON......� (HAND[:).........SAIL_Y......
(SALTARELLI)..•MOESTEREY..._ (MURPHY).........BEVERAGE...._
(LUXIMBOURGER).GRISET......� (ZIEGLER7........BUCK........_ _
(WIEDEi).......STANi]N....._ (NORSY)..........CATLIN......
�
(PERRY)..........CULVER......
(SALTAR
DISTRI:i 2 (REESE)... .....GRIFFIN.....
(MORBY)........CATLIN......_ _ _ (LUXEMBOURGER)...GRISET......
(ZIEGLSR)......BUCK........_ (CRANK)..........HANSON......
(LUXEMSOURGER7.GRI5ET......_ _ (COX)............MART........
(5112EL).......KAWANAMI...._ _ _ (SALTARELLI)....•HOESTEREY..._ _
(WEDEL)........MAHONEY..... (SILZEL).........KAWANAMI...._
(BEVERAGE).....MURPHY...... (WEDEL)..........MAHONEY.....
(SCOTT)........MEAL........ (COX)....... .... .MAUREA......
_
(CULVER).......PERRY....... (BAKER)..........MILLER......
(OVERHOLT).....ROTH........ (BEVERAGE).......MURPNY......
(SEVER)........SMITH......._ (SCOTT)....:.....NEAL........
_
(AZEDER).......STANTON..... (SUTTON)... .....NELSON......
_
(NELSON).......SUTTON...... (LACAY'J).........PARTIN......
_
(CULVER).........PERRY....... _
DISTRICT 3 (COX)............PLUMMER..... _
(NELSON).........POLLS.......
(OVERHOLT).....ROTH........� _ _ (WIEDER).........RILEY.......
(SUTTON).......NELSON...... _ _ (BROWNELL)......•RISNER......
(MANDI^_).......BAILEY......_ (OVERHOLT).......ROTH........
(HORSY)........CATLIN...... (PACE)...........SAPIEN......
(PERRY)........CULVER...... (WILES)..........SIE_FEN......
(RESSE)........6A[FFIx..L.._ (BEYER)..........SMITH.......
(- NEMBOURGER).GRISET......_ (WIEDER).........STANT3M.....
(WEDEL)........"HONEY....._ _ _ (NELSON).........SUTTON......
(SCOTT)........NEAL........ (MILLER).........SWAN........ _
(LACAY7).......PARTIN...... (SELVAGGI).......SYLVIA...... _
(NELSON).......POLLS ...... (FINLEY).........THOMAS......
(BROWNELL).....RISHER...... (GALLACMER/GREEN)WAMMER......_
(PACE).........SAPIEM......
(WILE S)........SIE_FEM......
(WIE_DER).......STRNTON....._
(SELVAGGI).....SYLVIA......
STAFF:
DISTRICT 5 SYLVESTER... ✓
v CLARKE......_
— —
(COX)..........HART........_ DAWES.......JC
(COX)..........MAURER...... ANDERSON....
(WIEDER).......5TANT7N....._ _ _ BU%ER......JG
BROWN.......JC
DISTRICT 6 BAKER.......
KYLE........
(GALLACHEA)....WANNER......_ _ _ VON LANGEN _
(COX)..........PLUMMER..... WINSOR......
(WIEDER).......STANTON..... _ _ $TREED......Z
CLAWSON.....
DISTRICT 7 oo TSN......._
LINGER......
(BAKER)........EDGAR MILLER......_
(BU(ER)........MILLER......_
(COX)..........MAIRER......_
(C0X1..........NAURER...... OTHERS: WOODRUFF..............
(WIEDER).......STANTON..... _ _ HOWARD...........
........WANNER......
XEIT........
DISTRICT 11 KNOPF.......
KE BLANC....�
(WINO[[).......BAILEY...... _ _ LE BLAME...._
(FINLEY).......STATHOMTON AS...... LINCH... 1...
(FINLEY) _ LYNCX......._
MEARCE......
WOUNG.......
_
(NELSON).......BEVERAGE SUTTON......
_ YOUNG......_ '
(NELSON).......ROTH........
(OVCRxOLT).....ROTM........_
(WffiOEA STANTON.....
DISTRICT lA
v (BAKER)........MILLER......
_ L a
(MILLER).......SWAN........_
(SALTARELLI)...EDGAR.......= _ _
(WIEDER).......RILEY......._ _ _
(WIEDER).......STANTON....._ _ _
02/13/86
MARCH 19, 1986 ADJOURNED DISTRICT 11 MTG. NOTES
#2 - Status report on District's Master Plan of Sewers
The General Manager called on the District's Director of Engineering, Tom Dawes,
v to report on the District's Master Plan of Sewers to serve developing
territories in and adjacent to the District. Tan briefly reviewed the history
of the formation of the Sanitation Districts. He said in the 1940's the Board
of Supervisors had a survey made of Orange County and proposed that 10 Districts
be formed. Before the Sanitation Districts were formed, there were a number of
small plants. After the Sanitation Districts were formed, most of the small
sewer districts went out of business. Most of the areas require pumping to get
to the Districts' system.
The southeast section of the city was served by a sewer that brought the flow
into the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer built in 1959 owned by District 3.
District 11 shared in the cost of the Miller-Holder Sewer and it was always
planned that someday District 11 would have its van sewage collection system and
sell the capacity back to District 3. In the last 6 years the District has
built the Coast Trunk Sewer fran Treatment Plant No. 2 to the Golden West Street
just north of Pacific Coast Highway. When that was built, water that formerly
went to District 3 was brought into District Ills system. The pump station was
able to be taken out after the Coast Trunk was built. All of the southeast part
of Huntington Beach is now serve] by the gravity Coast Trunk Sewer.
The northwest portion of Huntington Beach is now served by the main collector
sewers in Springdale and Golden West Streets. They drain to the pump station
between Golden West and Gothard. It pumps water up in Slater and drains into
the Knott Interceptor at Newland. The Knott Interceptor was built by District 3
but District 11 did participate in that cost base] on the capacity they needed.
It now pumps about 8 mad. The rest of the sewers drain about 9 mad for a total
of 17 m3d.
Two other areas are connected through the bluffs on the west side of the
Huntington Beach Mesa. The Slater Pump Station was built as an interim measure
for a period that has already been reached. Wat is planned is to extend a
sewer through the Seacliff area to the bluffs--Bluff Trunk Sewer--and build a
new pump station—Bolsa Chica Pump Station--which would allow all of this area
to go to the Coast Trunk Sewer to Plant 2. There are a couple of advantages.
It's the least amount of pumping that can be done. Will have a lower lift
and require less energy that than the existing pump station which was built
about 20 years ago and is largely at capacity now. The ultimate plan is to
extend this sewer through Palm Avenue to about Slater and send an interceptor to
the pump station and in the future extend that interceptor up Edwards. Also
referred to recent correspondence re providing sewers to Springdale. Ton said
this plan has been studied several times since 1959 but the basic plan has
pretty much stayed in tact.
Charles Thompson asked if the District uses the City's land use plan? TMD
replied, yes, exclusively.
TbD mentioned the mesa area bounded by Garfield, Talbert and just about to Beach
and Edwards. This portion of District 3 drains to District 11 and is served by
them. From Ellis to Garfield drains to the Newland-Delaware Trunk and Ellis
north drains to the Slater Pump Station. If the Slater Pump Station was to be
rebuilt, it would be quite a job. He said we are concerned about the level of
`� development that is proposed by the Huntington Beach Canpany and Mola
Development. This area in District 3 is served by the Slater Pump Station in
District 11. The Newland-Delaware system is in a little better shape but it too
is reaching its limit. Most of the area is fully developed. Medium density is
proposed. Both City and County staff have indicated that this is a very
important area and is not to be intruded on by a lot of development. Bob Mandic
stated that the east border of the Linear Regional Park is the subject of
... controversy by the City right now but the west boundry is pretty much
established. Tam said we would like the punp station to be at the base of the
park but the County staff suggested that it should be at the proposed extension
of Garfield. He indicated that the staff was not there to rexmmnd any
alignment at this time. Will study this with the City, land owners and
developers.
The General Manager commented that the Districts had a similar situation in
District 5 at the Upper Newport Bay. Wa put in sewers and actually improved the
wetland area. Mardic said anything we could do back there would be an
improvement.
Tan Dawes stated that the Bolas Chica development is not in District 11 nor in
any Sanitation District at this time. He added that about three years ago the
Sanitation Districts entered into an agreement with the County of orange which
led to the formation of District No. 13 which receives no tax revenue. All of
the island areas in Orange County were included as part of the agreement. The
agreement was very specific about Bolas Chico. It was not included as part of
the agreement because they could not care to any kind of agreement on that area.
To annex to District No. 11 is the most obvious way Bolas Chico could receive
sewer service. A big issue would be whether or not there would be a tax
exchange between the County and the Sanitation Districts. Bolas Chica cannot be
developed without the construction of major new facilities which are part of the
District 11 Master Plan. The facilities must be built even without Bolas. Chico
to take the pump station out of service, but Bolas Chica cannot be developer]
�.s without these facilities! The Coast Trunk Sewer was sized contemplating
drainage of the Bolas Chica area and it has the capacity. This plan must start
within five years. The Hoke Chica area could be sswered in conjunction with
City's Master Plan or sewer could be built along the east-west corridor and a
number of City pump stations could be abandoned.
The size of the new pipe from Golden West to the pump station will be about
54 inches and about 51-54 inches all the way to Slater. The Hoke Chica Pub
Station would have an average daily capacity fo 12 mgd. Very large pump
station. All relief lines should be implemented by the year 2000. A total of
about $18 million worth of construction will be required in District 11.
John Thomas asked about how much of this $18 million would the developers have
to put back into the District. TMD answered that for just the Hoke Chica area,
if annexed to District 11, there are about 5700 hams for a total of
$10 million. We should start looking at the area in District 3 being served by
District 11 also to get sore revenue out of it. That area pays $250 per house
connection charge to District 3 and in District 11 the connection charge is
$1250.
Wayne Sylvester added that the District 11 does have an agreement with
District 3 for the joint use of those facilities. Staff is starting to take a
look at the best long-range plan for those facilities. If we were going to
reorganize Districts 3 and 11, then that would be the key issue—what is the
revenue base as opposed to the cost of service. It would have to be acceptable
to both District 3 and District 11. Benefit must equal cost of service.
-2-
Tan Dawes added that when this area drains into the Coast Trunk Sewer,
District 11 can sell back the capacity in the Knott Interceptor and interplant
line. That will generate about $1.4 million. There is an existing formula for
the buy-back. Cast of capacity is based on current value.
JWS then referred to the financial aspect of this required construction projects
and the schedules enclosed with the Directors agenda material. They give the
staff's best projections over the next several years as to how these facilities
will be built in terms of timing and costs. A cash flaw summery for District
No. 11 was also included. He reviewed lines 1-14 showing income and
expenditures for financing operating costs of the District, which includes the
District's share of operating and maintaining the treatment facilities in
Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach and the cost of operating and maintaining
the trunk sewer system. The second major expenditure is the capital funds on
lines 15-32 and it is how we finance the capital requirements of the Districts
and includes both the District's share of the treatment plant expansion work and
trunk sewer Master Plan system. Lines 33-44 represent the retirement of bond
funds currently outstanding and will be paid off within the next 5 years.
Mr. Sylvester then asked Bill Butler, the District's Director of Finance to
review the capital financing of the major trunk sewer program.
Bob Mandic asked why the carry-over was so high? JWS explained that we do our
financing on a long-term basis for the treatment plant program and construction
of Master Plan sewers. The Districts' policy is to finance capital improvements
on a pay-as-you-go basis and must acou[mnulate funds during a 5-20 year period.
Bill Butler reported that the major portion of the construction program outlined
by Tan Dawes is for three projects totaling $13.5 million: (1) the Coast Trunk
Sewer (2) the Bolas Chica Punp Station and (3) the Bluff Trunk Sewer. We are
proposing, as in the past, to finance them with agreements with developers to
put up the money and we then reimbursement them fran connection fees. Will need
$2.85 mullion upfront coney from developers to construct facilities (line 23).
The collection system projects are shown for 7 years while the cash flow is for
only 5 years so there is still another $2.75 million not shown on the cash flaw
for the other two years.
In January District 14 was formed and as part of this formation, Irvine Ranch
Water District purchased capacity in the joint treatment works worth
$34 million. Have received $17 million this year and will receive $17 mullion
next year. $2.9 million is District 11's share for this year. Overall we will
be able to, with the support of developers, have sufficient capital funds to
complete the system TMD described. The operating fund is not in as good as
shape as the capital fund. In 1987-88 it might find itself in a deficit position.
Districts 1, 5, and 6 have supplemental user fees and District 13 is financed
100% by user fees. District 11 may find itself in a similar position. Prior to
implementing a user fee program, in the past we have taken capital monies that
are in reserve and moved then into the operating fund to delay the supplemental
user fee implementation. %e could cane back in the next 3-5 years and suggest
that District 11 needs to go to a user fee. Districts 1, 5 and 6 presently
collect $26.50 per year on the property tax roll as a separate line item. We
have been able to hold the line on that fee and have not had to push it up on a
routine basis by holding the operating costs dawn. Overall the District has a
balance of $6.4 million. By planning for 5-7 years it allows us to stay ahead
of financial requirements and don't end up with any surpluses and can keep
Directors informed. This balance does not include implementation of a sewer use
fee. He mentioned also that new District 14 will be totally financed by the
Irvine Ranch Water District which is financed by user fees. District 5 was the
first District to establish a user fee in 1981.
-3-
The General Manager explained that the coastal Districts experience financial
difficulties faster than other Districts because their costs are high because we
have to pimp all of the facilities to get to the treatment plants. Our approach
has been very conservative in projecting their financial position. Staff would
rather project the worse scenario. He referred to line 14 which showed a
negative situation and stated that unless some major that is not foreseen
happens, we world expect that situation would not occur because of their
conservative financial projections. In 1985-86 (line 45) the total carry-over
in term of reserves this year was $10.3 million. On line 51 for 1989-90 it
shows $6.4 million.
With regard to our share of ad valorem taxes, we get about 38 of the
18 allocation. Depending upon how fast property turns over, line 2 will reflect
a higher revenue as the property will be revalued and this will increase
property tax revenue for all public agencies. New development will also affect
that. That will forestall a user fee also.
Mr. Sylvester state that the staff would continue to work and cooperate with the
City staff on our mutual sewerage needs. He expressed appreciation to the City
staff for their cooperation. The City also indicated how nuch they enjoyed
working with the Districts' staff.
Barth Bailey asked what needed to be done to annex the Bolsa Chica area to
District 11 and the District 3 area? JWS explained that the first thing is for
the staff to do a study relative to sewesing the area and compare the tax
financial base. Then they would present that information to the Boards of
Districts 3 and ll. Charles Thompson asked if staff predicted a negative
result for District 11 and was told we didn't know and that is why a study
needed to be done. If appropriate, a reorganization through IAFCD would have to
be approved. It would require 'notices to all property owners and a public
hearing. If enough people protested, it would require an election. The Bolsa
(mica area would be an annexation to District ll and would be a IAFOD process
also. The annexation request would came from the property owner. A question
was asked regarding what the Signal landmark people could do besides annex to
the Sanitation Districts? There are three alternatives:
(1) Annex to District ll which would be a District ll decision.
(2) Form anew District which world be a Joint Boards decision.
(3) Ask to be served by contract which would be a Joint Boards decision.
Director John Thomas then moved that the staff be directed to contdmmie to study
the best means of serving the Hoke Chica area and the area tributary to the
Coast Trunk Sewer and Newland-Delaware Sewer systems which said territory is
currently outside the District boundary. Ruth Bailey seconded the motion.
Motion carried.
It was explained that of the $1,250 connection fee, $1,000 of it goes to repay
the developer, Mansion Properties. They will be paid off in one more payment
but the same process would be used for the future construction projects so this
fee will not be decreased.
-4-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
March 19, 1986 - 3:30 P.M.
2000 Main Street - Room B7
V Huntington Beach, California
Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of March 12, 1986, the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in- the
Huntington Beach City Hall.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. The roll was called
and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT: Ruth Bailey, Chairman, John Thomas
DIRECTORS ABSENT: Roger Stanton
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Thomas M. Dawes, William H. Butler,
Rita Brown, Gary Streed
OTHERS PRESENT: Bob Mandic, Ruth Finley, Charles
Thompson, Les Evans, Paul Cook, Bill
Patapoff, Connie Brockway
Status report on District's Master The staff reviewed the status of the
Plan of Sewers to serve developing District's present sewerage facilities
territories in and adjacent to the and those master planned to be
District constructed within the next five years
to serve the developing territories in
and adjacent to the District.
The District has been constructing the Coast Trunk Sewer in segments for the
last several years. This will provide the needed capacity for the District
and, when completed, will direct major flows from the existing collection
system, which partially utilizes District No. 3 facilities, to the Coast
Trunk Sewer. To date, the Coast Trunk Sewer has been completed from the
Huntington Beach treatment plant to Golden West Street just north of Pacific
Coast Highway. All of the southeastern section of Huntington Beach is now
being served by this new gravity sewer. In the future, this major collector
will be extended to Huntington Beach Mesa Bluff, then northerly to Slater
Avenue where it will allow the existing Slater Pump Station, which was built
as an interim measure, to be abandoned. Future collectors will extend north
in Edwards to McFadden with laterals in Heil, Edinger and McFadden Avenues.
It was noted that all projections for future sewerage requirements were
based on the City's land use plans.
The staff further reviewed preliminary plans for a new pump station which
would have a lower lift and, therefore, require less energy than the
�..� existing pump station which was built over 20 years ago.
-1-
03/19/86
The Directors and staff entered into a lengthy discussion relative to
proposed development and sewerage needs of the Bolsa Chica area. It was
pointed out that the proposed construction of major new facilities which are
part of the District No. 11 Master Plan must be completed whether or not
Bolsa Chica is developed, but Bolas Chica cannot be developed without these
facilities. The Coast Trunk Sewer was sized contemplating drainage from the
Bolsa Chica area and does have the necessary capacity. There are three
options available in order to provide sewerage service to the Bolsa Chica
area:
(1) Annex to District No. 11
(2) Form a new Sanitation District
(3) Contract with the Sanitation Districts for sewage service
The staff also reviewed provisions for sewerage service to areas in
Huntington Beach that are not now in District No. 11 but are served by
District No. 11's Newland-Delaware and Coast Trunk Sewer systems through an
agreement with District No. 3.
The total estimated cost of the new facilities required to serve developing
territories in and adjacent to District No. 11 is about $18 million. This
will be partially offset by capacity exchanges with District No. 3 which
will net the District $1.4 million from the sale of capacity in the
Newland-Delaware Trunk, Coast Trunk and Knott Interceptor systems.
Alignment and right-of-way acquisition studies will begin in fiscal year
1986-87, It is anticipated that design of the next units of this system
will begin in about 1988 and construction would be completed in about five
years.
The Director of Finance then reviewed projected financial information used
to help determine the schedule for completion of the proposed sewer
improvements. The District must accummulate the necessary funds over a
period of several years in order to continue the Districts' policy of
financing capital improvements on a pay-as-you-go basis. The District will
also continue its policy of entering into reimbursement agreements with
developers to obtain the necessary advance payments required to begin the
construction projects to serve those territories.
Within the next three to five years, District No. 11 may need to consider
establishing a supplemental user fee program similar to those previously
adopted by Districts Nos. 1, 5 and 6.
It was explained that the coastal Districts experience financial
difficulties sooner than the other Sanitation Districts because of the high
cost of pumping required to transport the wastewater to the treatment
plants.
Directing staff to study best means It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
of serving the Bolas Chica area and
area tributary to the Coast Trunk That the staff be, and is hereby,
and Newland-Delaware Sewer systems directed to continue to study the best
means of providing sewerage service to
the Bolas Chica area and the area tributary to the Coast Trunk Sewer and the
Newland-Delaware Sewer systems which are currently outside District No. 11's
boundary, and to report back to the Boards.
Secretary, Board 6f Directors
County Sanitation District No. 11
-2-
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the
hour of 7:30 p.m., March 12, 1986, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 3:30 p.m.,
Wednesday, March 19, 1986, at the Huntington Beach City Hall. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:42 p.m. , March 12, 1986.
r.'
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and
correct copy of minute entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the
12thday of March, 1986.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of March,
1986.
Secretary of he Board. of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14