Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-07-10 s COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714) 540-2910 (914) 962-2411 July 3, 1985 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13 WEDNESDAY, JULY 10, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. v-secretary ry Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF - Wednesday, July loth at 6:00 p.m. DISTRICT NO. 1 - Thursday, July 18th at 7:30 p.m. at the Santa Ana City Council Chambers FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Tuesday, July 23rd at 5:00 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, July 24th at 5:30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA R.a 80z 8127 fO11NTNN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 82728.� 1OS4A EWS AVENUE MUWMN VALLEY.CAUN)RNIA 92A8`N118 OUI W.28+0 mna52zan JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings July Jul 10, 1985 Jul 24, 1985 August Aug 14, 1985 None Scheduled September Sep 11, 1985 Sep 25, 1985 October Oct 16, 1985 (THIS IS A CHANGE Oct 23, 1985 FROM THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED DATE OF OCT 9, 1985) November Nov 13, 1985 None Scheduled December Dec 11, 1985 None Scheduled V January Jan 8, 1986 Jan 22, 1986 February Feb 12, 1986 Feb 26, 1986 March Mar 12, 1986 Mar 26, 1986 April Apr 9, 1986 Apr 23, 1986 May May 14, 1986 May 28, 1986 June Jun 11, 1986 Jun 25, 1986 July Jul 9, 1986 Jul 23, 1986 y BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation District P., offk. S.. 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Talepho ; JOINT BOARDS "" 14 96 1 IIAGENDA MEETING DATE - JUU 10, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT QU H8.4D, IN ADDITION, STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT / ; P,M, IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) (a) Appointment of Chairmen pro temp if necessary (b) DISTRICT- 11: Annual election of Chairman and Chairman pro tem (4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See Supplemental Agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: I£ no Corrections or amendments are made, the fallowing minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - June 12, 1985, regular and June 27, 1985, adjourned District 2 - June 12, 1985, regular and Jane 27, 1985, adjourned District 3 - June 12, 1985, regular and .June 27, 1985, adjourned District 5 - June 12, 1985, regular, June 25, 1985, adjourned and June 27, 1985, adjourned District 6 - June 12, 1985, regular, June 25, 1985, adjourned and June 27, 1985, adjourned District 7 - June 12, 1983, regular and June 27, 1985, adjourned - `./ District 11 - June 12, 1985, regular and June 27, 1985, adjourned (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General manager (c) General Counsel (8) Annual election of Joint Chairman - Nominees: Director Richard B. Edgar Director Don R. Griffin (9) Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless "a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See page(s) "A" and "B" 6 12/85 6 26 85 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fond - $ 494,682.86 $ 331,958.81 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 96,097.26 202,852.56 Joint Working Capital Pund - 54,249.60 84,860.51 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 971.32 2,974.80 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 3,006.99 6,573.72 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 17,177.05 22,113.77 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 843.02 11,337.24 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 1,207.05 8,162.27 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 59.73 21.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 5,539.21 6,870.45 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 89.00 10,563.28 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 6 6 JOINT - - 37.39 8,063.26 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 3,396.22 1,696.61 $ 677,356.70 $ 698,048.28 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 11(a) THRODGH 11(t) V (11) ALL DISTRICTS All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. - Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on V the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- 7/10/85 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal "Grants under 33 U.S.C., 1251 at seg. and State Grants under Clean Water Bond Laws for the 1985-86 Joint Works Improvements and Additions: See page C. District No. Resolution No. 1 85-97-1 2 85-98-2 3 85-99-3 5 85-100-5 6 85-101-6 7 85-102-7 11 85-103-11 13 85-104-13 (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Digesters "C" and "D" at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-061R-2, and Rehabilitation of Digesters "F" and "G" at Plant No. 2, Job No. PN-061R-3, authorizing an addition of $13,274,79 to the contract with Riewit Pacific Company for removal of sidewall and roof penetrations not indicated on the plans and cleanup of sludge and debris caused by an overflow. See page "D" (c) (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Lobe Oil Storage Tank at \..V Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PN-129, authorizing changes including deletion of painting requirement, installation of stop/lock-out button at pump and sealing of tank interior, for a net deduction of $689.65 from the contract with Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor See page E. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-105, accepting Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page OF. (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Ferrous Chloride System for Digester Gas Sulfide Reduction, Job No. PW-141, authorizing an addition of $25,097.80 to the contract with Fraser Corporation for miscellaneous job modifications including installation of 165 feet of water line and 170 feet of air Line, realignment of a drain pipe, installation of eight replacement filters, credit for unused filters, and payment of early completion bonus related to AQMD Rule 431.1 requirements. See page "G" (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins "F" and "G" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2, authorizing an addition of $3,774.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for installation of six larger stainless steel knife gate valves. See page H. -3- 7/10/8p .. (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (f) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase Contract for Rehabilitation of No. 1 Trickling Filter at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. R-018, to Dorado Enterprises, . Inc. in the total amount of $29,620.00. See page "I" (g) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee re Architectural Services Agreement with Pulaski and Arita, Architects Incorporated, for design of Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4. See page J. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-106, approving Architectural Services Agreement with Pulaski and Arita, Architects Incorporated, for design of Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, on an hourly-rate basis including actual salary, overhead and profit, plus direct job expenses, for a total amount not to exceed $168,500.00. See page K. (h) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Engineering-Science for value design/engineering services re Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34; and coordinating schedules for above and other associated rehabilitation projects. See page "L" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-107, approving agreement with Engineering-Science for value design/engineering services re Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34; and coordinating schedules for above and other associated rehabilitation projects, on an hourly-rate basis including overhead and profit, plus direct costs, for a total amount not to exceed $102,100.00. See page M. (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-108, approving Temporary Construction License and License Agreements to occupy right-of-way with the Orange County Water District to construct and maintain its Green Acres Pipeline under Districts' interplant sewers adjacent to the Santa Ana River between Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 in the vicinities of Garfield Avenue and Adams Street See page "N" -4- 7/10/85 (11) DISTRICT 1 (j) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-120-1, establishing a Facilities Revolving Fund to account for the District's connection fees. See page °O" DISTRICT 2 (k) (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, authorizing miscellaneous items of extra work, approving a time extension of 82 calendar days for completion of said work, and assessing liquidated damages for 27 calendar days at $250 per day for late completion, for a net deduction of $2,843.88 from the contract with Subgrade Construction Company. See page P. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-121-2, accepting Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page Q. (1) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee re Addendum No. 1 to Engineering Services Agreement with Lowry and Associates for design of the Fullerton-Brea Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-25. See page "R" �..' (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-122-2, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Services Agreement with Lowry and Associates for design of the Fullerton-Brea Relief Trunk, providing for alignment changes to install the sewer in Harbor Boulevard between Berkeley Avenue and Valley View Drive; for inclusion of detour traffic plans; consolidation of two projects into one; and for work on the existing sewer, for a lump sum fee of $62,601.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $330,000.00 to $392,601.00. See page S. DISTRICT 3 (m) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for design of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1. See page "T" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-123-3, approving Engineering Services Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for design of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1, on an hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead., plus direct expenses and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $39,610.00. See page U. -5- 7/10/8� (11) DISTRICT 3 (Continued) (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-124-3, accepting Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page V. (o) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny leave to file late claim from the Automobile Club of Southern California on behalf of Carmen and Charlotte Vernieri with regard to alleged damages to their vehicle sustained in connection with Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, as recommended by the General Counsel DISTRICTS 5 6 6 (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-125, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Replacement of Portions of "B" Trunk Sewer, East of Santa Ana River Junction Structure to Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-19-R2, to John T. Malloy and John T. Malloy, Inc. , a Joint Venture, in the amount of $420,710.00. See page W. DISTRICT 7 (q) (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4, transmitting new proposal and bond forms which change the quantity of 60-inch reinforced concrete pipe from 4,199 linear feet to 3,969 linear feet. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-126-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4, to Steve Bubalo Construction Company in the amount of $2,240,920.00. See page X. (r) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Southern California Edison Company for alleged damages to their underground ducts in connection with construction of the Von Barman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, and refer to the District's liability claims administrator, General Counsel, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action DISTRICT 11 (a) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated June 30, 1985, re Blockage on Golden West Trunk Sewer. (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (2) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to prepare plans and specifications for Installation of Two Additional Manholes on the Golden West Trunk Sewer Siphon, Contract No. 11-3-1, at the Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel to allow better maintenance access and alleviate future blockages -6- 7/10/85 1) DISTRICT 13 (t) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-127-13, establishing funds to account for the District's revenues and expenditures. See page Yn END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from the consent calendar, if any -7- 7/10/85 (13) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-108, adopting the County Treasurer's Annual Statement of Investment Policy and requesting the County Auditor-Controller to review the County Treasurer's Monthly Investment Reports on behalf of the Districts, as recommended by the General Counsel. (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to CPT Corporation in an amount not to exceed $108,611.00 for office automation/word processing system upgrades (c) Staff report re proposed fiscal year 1985-86 budgets (1) DISTRICT 1 - Roll call vote motion approving 1985-86 fiscal year budget (2) DISTRICT 2 - Roll call vote motion approving 1985-86 fiscal year budget (3) DISTRICT 3 - Roll call vote motion approving 1985-86 fiscal year budget (4) DISTRICT 5 - Roll call vote motion approving 1985-86 fiscal year budget (5) DISTRICT 6 - Roll call vote motion approving 1985-86 fiscal year budget (6) DISTRICT 7 - Roll call vote motion approving 1985-86 fiscal year budget (7) DISTRICT 11 - Roll call vote motion approving 1985-86 fiscal year budget (8) DISTRICT 13 - Roll call vote motion approving 1985-86 fiscal year budget (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-109, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re Management salary v range adjustments pursuant to Management Performance Review Program. (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following resolutions establishing the annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal year 1985-86 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code. See page Z. DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION 1 85-110-1 $1,740,309 2 85-111-2 7,236,699 3 85-112-3 9,113,843 5 85-113-5 1,874,003 6 85-114-6 1,090,863 7 85-115-7 2,177,190 11 85-116-11 1,915,521 13 85-117-13 Not Applicable -8- 7/10/85 (16) ' ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee dated July 1, 1985, re actions taken by the Committee relative to Districts' excess liability and workers' `, compensation insurance coverage (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee: (1) Consideration of motion ratifying action of the Fiscal Policy Committee directing the staff and the Districts' insurance broker to place $10,000,000 of secondary excess liability insurance coverage effective July 1, 1985, for an annual premium of $70,133.00 (2) Consideration of motion ratifying the action of the Fiscal Policy Committee directing the staff and the Districts' insurance broker to study the feasibility of the Districts assuming a higher self-insured retention level for excess liability insurance coverage beginning with the next policy year in 1986. (3) Consideration of motion ratifying the action of the Fiscal Policy Committee directing the staff and the Districts' insurance broker to place statutory workers' compensation (unlimited benefits) coverage with a self-insured retention of $150,000 effective July 1, 1985, for an annual premium of $13,556.00 (17) ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report and recommendations of Select Advisory Committee re Sludge Management Agreement with EKO Systems/Orange County, Ltd. (Committee meets on July loth immediately preceding the Joint Board meeting) (18) ALL DISTRICTS (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee's certification of final negotiated fee re Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, for Contract Period Mo. 1, with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) . See page 'AA' (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-118, approving agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, for the lump sum amount of $917,680.00; rejecting the proposal of Jacobs Environmental as non-responsive; and rejecting all other proposals received. See page 'BB' -9- 7/10/85 (19) . ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of actions relative to the Final Environmental Impact Report for Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Summary Report dated June 26, 1985, summarizing the Final EIR re Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (b) Verbal report of environmental consultant, R. P. Lindstrom 5 Associates (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments received after the public hearing on April 10, 1985 (included in Final EIR document) (d) Discussion (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Final Environmental Impact Report; and certify that said Final Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the State and District Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-119, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan; making certain findings in connection therewith; adopting a statement of overriding considerations; and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination re said projects. (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (g) Consideration of motion approving 1983 Master Plan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities, as amended (20) DISTRICT 1 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m. , July 18, 1985, at the Santa Ana City Council Chambers (22) DISTRICT 2 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 3 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn '(26) DISTRICT 5 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -10- (27) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 6 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 7 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (32) DISTRICT 11 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (34) DISTRICT 13 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (35) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn L -11- ^MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Post Office Be- 8127 County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Volley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Arco Cade 714 540-2910 JOINT BOARDS 962-24111 Meeting Date July 10, 1985 - 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not other- wise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager's Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer's estimate. Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award. ALL DISTRICIS No. 11(a) : Authorizing Application for Federal Grants for 1985-86 Joint Forks Improvements and Additions. The action appearing in the agenda adopts resolutions for each of the Districts authorizing execution and filing of all documents necessary for State and Federal grant applications for 1985-86. No. 11(b) : Approval of Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation of Digesters C & D at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-061R-2, Rehabilitation of Digesters F & G at Plant No. 2, Job No. FW-061R-3. Change Order No. 1 is an addition of $13,274.79 to the contract. It covers four items of work including removal of a concrete slab in the control roam, removal of additional sidewall and roof penetrations not indicated on the plans and clean up of sludge and debris from an overflow. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $13,274.79 to the contract. No. 11(c) : Approval of Change Order Nb. 2 to Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Rom Station, Plant No. 2 Job No. PW-129• and Acceptance of Job as Complete. 1. Change Order Do. 2: Change Order No. 2 covers one deletion item for painting, and two additional items of work for a stop/lock-out button -1- July 10, 1985 to prevent over filling of the oil reservoir on a pump and sealing of the tank interior to prevent rusting prior to being put into service for a net deduction of $689.65 from the contract. There is no time extension asso- ciated with this change order. Staff recomnends approval of Change Order No. 2 deducting $689.65 from the contract. 2. Closeout: The contractor, Frank Ultimo, General Contractor, has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and authorized time extensions to construct cube oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. P -129. Staff recom ands adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material authorizing acceptance of the pork as complete, execution of the final closeout agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. There were two change orders to this contract totaling a net addition of $25.10 for a final amended contract price of $24,096.10. There was also a two-day tine extension to the contract. No. 11(d) : Approval of Change Order No. 1 to Ferrous Chloride System for Digester Gas Sulfide Reduction, Job No. Pa-141. Change Order No. 1 is a net addition of $25,097.80 to the contract. Included in the change order are hire item including major cost items for installation of 165 feet of one-inch water line and 170 feet of one-inch air line; realignment of a drain pipe to avoid obstructions not indicated .. on the plans; installation of eight high-pressure filters to replace eight low-pressure filters originally specified. There is no time extension associated with this change order. This project was required to comply with A M Rule 431.1 by July 1, 1985 and had a very tight time frame for completion. The contract, thus, provided for an early operational completion bonus. The contractor is eligible for three days at $1,000 per day which is also included in this change order. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $25,097.80 to the contract. No. ll(e): Approval of Change Order No. 2 to Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins F s G at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2. Change Order No. 2 adds $3,774 to the contract for installation of six ten-inch knife gate valves in lieu of the smaller gate valves origi- nally specified. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Staff recommends approval of Change Omer No. 2 adding $3,774 to the contract. v -2- July 10, 1985 No. 11(f): Award of Specification No. R-018, Rehabilitation of No. 1 Trickling Filter at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Rehabilitation of the No. 1 Trickling Filter, necessitated by bearing wear and some structural deterioration, will include complete disassembly, sandblasting and mating of all sections of each of the four distribution arms and the center well. Also included will be the replacement and overhaul of the main bearing and turntable mechanism and reassembly, balancing and operational testing. On June 25, 1985 five bids were received to perform this work ranging from a high of $82,000 to a low of $29,620. Staff recommends that award be made to Dorado Enterprises, Inc., the low bidder, in the total amount of $29,620. No. 11(g): Approve Selection Committee Certification and Award a Contract for Architectural Services for Administration Building Addition at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-7-4. In April, the Boards of Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals from architects for architectural and construction-support services for the Administration Building Addition at Plant No. 1. The contemplated improvements include additional office space and modifications to the Board Roan as recommended by the Building Committee and approved by the Joint Boards at the April 10, 1985 meeting. The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee with Pulaski and Arita Architects based on an hourly-rate basis including actual salary, overhead and profit plus direct expenses for a maximum amount riot to exceed $168,500. The work includes preparation of plans and specifications, construction services, as well as frequent progress meetings with the staff and Building Committee. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving an agreement with Pulaski and Arita Architects to provide the necessary architectural, engi- neering and construction services for Administration Building Addition at Plant No. 1. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting documents. No. 11(h): Approve Selection Committee Certification and Agreement with Engineering-Science for value Design/Engineering Services and Scheduling Coordination on Jobs P1-25, P2-32 P1-26 P2-33 P2-34 and Associated Projects. Last month the Directors awarded a contract to Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. to design the covers and scrubbers for all primary sedimentation basins at both plants and authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate with Engineering-Science for a contract to perform value design/engineering work including scheduling coordination with the many other projects asso- ciated with the odor control program. -3- July 10, 1985 The Selection Committee has met and negotiated a fee with �. Engineering-Science based on an hourly labor rate including overhead and profit, plus direct expenses. The contract includes value design services and computerized construction scheduling that will become the property of the Districts upon completion of the work. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Owudttee Certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving an agreement with Engineering Science, Inc. for the Value Design/Engineering Services in connection with the Design of Covers for the Primary Basins, Foul Air Scrubbing Systems plus Improvements to Grit Facilities B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A and scheduling coordination with the above projects and other associated rehabilitation projects. Copies of the cer- tification and resolution are attached with the supporting documents. No. 11(i) : Efewtion of a License Agreement with Orange County Water District. The Orange County Water District proposes to construct lines under the Santa Ana Rives at Garfield and south of Adams Avenue to transmit reclaimed water from its Water Factory 21 for irrigation purposes at golf courses, parks and other sites. This agenda item is to authorize execu- tion of a license agreement with the Orange County Water District for the installation of the reclaimed water lines under the Districts' interplant sewer right-of-way adjacent to the westerly level of the Santa Ana River es located between Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2. General Counsel has prepared license agreements to be executed with the orange County Water District which provide for temporary construction work and a license to occupy the Districts' right-cf-way at no cost to the Water District. Staff recommends execution of the license agreement. DISTRICT M. 1 _ No. 11(j): Establishing Facilities Revolving Eland. The Board of Directors has adopted a long-range financial plan which includes a connection fee for developing properties to pay for sewerage facilities required to serve the new development. The resolution attached to the agenda formally authorizes the County Auditor and Treasurer to establish a new fund called the Facilities Revolving Fund to account for the connection fees collected. DISTRICT NJ. 2 No. 11(k): n roval of Change Order No 1 Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station Contract No. 2-24 and Acceptance of Job as ed Complete. 1. Change Osier No. 1. Change order No. 1 covers additional work to remove and dispose of paving; costs for breaking up and removing a rock -4- July 10, 1985 formation not indicated on the plans; installation of two additional fit- tings and thrust blocks to bring the pipe into the manhole at a higher elevation, and slurrying of approximately 3,300 square feet of roadway in front of the new pump station. There is a time extension allowed for this work plus delays in delivery of equipment of 82 calendar days. The change order also assesses liquidated damages for 27 calendar days at $250 per day against the contractor for late completion of the work. The net change order is for a deduction of $2,843.88. The staff reoonmends approval of Change Order No. 1 to the contract. 2. Closeout: The contractor, Subgrade Construction Ocapany, has fulfilled all contractual obligations. A time extension has been granted up to May 25, 1985 and liquidated damages have been assessed for 27 calendar days from that date to the operational date of completion of this project. (See Change Order No. 1 above.) The staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final closeout agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final amended contract price is $135,786.92. No. 11(1) : Approve Selection committee Certification and Addendum No. 1 to Lowry and Associates for Fullerton-Brea (Purchase) Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-25. The Directors have previously approved a design engineering contract with Iowry and Associates for engineering services in connection with the Design of the Fullerton-Brea (Purchase) Relief Trunk Sewer. This facility will generally parallel an existing facility constructed by the Cities of Fullerton and Brea in 1954. staff and the consultant have met with the City of Fullerton staff on several occasions and an alignment revision appears best suited for both agencies. The new line was originally designed in Berkeley Avenue parallel to Harbor Boulevard south of Brea Boulevard. Now the City of Fullerton and the District agree that the line should stay within Harbor Boulevard bet- ween Berkeley Avenue and Valley View Drive and be placed in Hillcrest Park between Valley View Drive and Brea Boulevard. It is estimated that the Sanitation District will save approximately $400,000 by this realignment. Strict construction conditions will be included in the contract documents to minimize impact on the surrounding community. The City of Fullerton has requested that the traffic detour plans be made a part of the design contract. In the past, the preparation of traf- fic detour plans has generally been required of the contractor and approved by District and City staffs. The District agrees that it would be best for the project to include the detour plans as part of the contract documents. The District pays for the preparation of traffic detour plans whether the designer or the contractor prepares then, and the District should receive a benefit through lower bid prices from the contractor if these plans are included in the contract documents. -5- July 10, 1985 It was originally anticipated that the project would be bid in two phases. Because the project has been delayed and in order to achieve cer- tain economies of scale, it is the recommendation of staff that the pro- ject be bid as one unit. Staff believes that this will reduce the construction tine required. At the last Board meeting, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate with the engineer, rmwry and Associates, to make these changes. The Selection Oamuittee has negotiated a fee to perform the additional work on a lump sum basis, consistent with the original contract fee provisions, for the amount of $62,601. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee Certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a Resolution approving Addendum th. 1 to the agreement with lowry and Associates for the additional work. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached to the supporting documents. DISTRICF No. 3 No. 11(m). Approve Selection Oommittee Certification and Award a Contract to Clifford Fbrkert, Civil Engineer, for Enlineerim Design Services for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilition at Various locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1. The Selection Committee has solicited proposals for the Design of Miller-Bolder Trunk Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1. This is the next project in the District's program of rehabilitating manhole vaults on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer that have deteriorated because of hydrogen sulfide attack. The work includes replacement or repair of 79 existing manholes. The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee with Clifford Fbrkert, Civil Engineer, based on labor and overhead, out-of-pocket expenses and profit for a maximum amount not to exceed $39,610. The work includes pre- paration of-the plans and specifications as well as engineering services during construction. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving an agreement with Clifford Fbrkert, Civil Engineer, to prepare the necessary documents to bid the Engineering Design Services for Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various locations, Contract tb. 3-28R-1. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting docu- ments. No. 11(n): Acceptance of Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Contract No. 3-28R as oxnplete. The contractor, Mike Prlicn and Sons, has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and authorized time extensions to perform -6- July 10, 1985 the work for Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. The staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execotion of the final closeout agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. There were three change orders to this contract totaling $47,377.08 for a final amended contract price of $871,617.08. No. 11(o): Receive, File and DenV Leave to File late Claim Submitted by Automobile Club of Southern California for Carmen J. and Charlotte M. Vernieri re Ontract No. 3-28R. The District has received a request from Automobile Club of Southern California for Carmen J. and Charlotte M. Vernieri to file a late claim against the District for damages caused on October 31, 1985. Their car sustained sandpit damage to the windshield and paint allegedly caused by lines being sandblasted in connection with Contract No. 3-28R, Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. The amount of the claim is $298.11 The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny the request to file late claim as recommended by the District's General Counsel. DISTRICT NOS. 5 AND 6• No. 11(p): Award of Contract for Replacement of Portions of "B" Trunk Sewer, East of Santa Ana River Junction Structure to Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-19R-2. in June, the Boards approved plans and specifications for design of Replacement of Portions of "B" Trunk Sewer from 2,077 feet easterly of Plant No. 2 (where the last December's emergency repairs to the sewer stopped) to the Bitter Point Pump Station. This is the next project for the planned rehabilitation of the Coast Highway Trunk System. On June 25, 1985 nine bids were received for the Replacement of Portions of "B" Trunk Sewer, East of Santa Ana River Junction Structure to Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-19R-2. The bids ranged from a high of $744,844 to a low of $420,710 submitted by John T. Malloy and John T. Malloy, Inc., a Joint Venture, of Los Angeles. A complete bid tabula- tion is attached to the agenda. The staff recommends award to John T. Malloy and John T. Malloy, Inc., a Joint Venture, for their low bid amount of $420,710. The engineer's esti- mate for this work was $532,190. -7- July 10, 1985 DISTRICT NO. 7 �+ No. ll(q) : Approval of Addendum No. 1 and Award of Contract for Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4. In March, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for construction of the Main Street Trunk Sewer, which is necessary to serve expanding development including major hotels, office and cow ercial buildings being constructed in the airport area. This sewer also provides capacity for proposed District No. 14. 1. Addendum No. 1: Addendum Nb. .I decreases the quantity of 60-inch reinforced concrete pipe necessary for construction of the sewer from 4,199 linear feet to 3,969 linear feet. Staff recomuends approval of Addendum 4b. 1. 2. Award of Contract: on June 25, 1985 three bids were received for the Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4. The bids ranged from a high of $2,725,000 to a low of $2,240,920 submitted by Steve Hubalo Construction Company of Reseda. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the agenda. Staff recmuends award to Steve Hubalo Construction Company for their low bid amount of $2,240,920. The engineer's estimate for this work was $2,540,000. No. 11(r) : Receive, File and Deny Claim Submitted by Southern California Edison C=Vany re Contract No. 7-8. The District has received a claim from Southern California Edison C3hpany dated June 3, 1985, for alleged damages to underground ducts caused by a bacdhoe digging during construction of Von Karmen Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8. The amount of the claim is $516.34. The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny the claim and refer it to the District's liability claims administra- tor, General Counsel, contractor and the contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT NO. 11 No. 11(a): Actions re Golden west Trunk Sewer Modifications to Correct Maintenance Problem at Flood Control Crossing Siphon. In January of this year, the District experienced a blockage in a siphon on the Golden West Trunk Sewer north of Warner Avenue at its crossing of the Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel. Since the blockage was cleared, the staff has further investigated the condition of the sewer to determine what could be done to prevent a recurrence of this problem. -8- July 10, 1985 Attached to your agenda material is a more detailed report of staff s findings and a recommendation that two new manholes be built to allow better maintenance access to the portion of the lire under the flood control channel. It is reconmmxded that the staff report be received and filed and that staff be authorized to prepare plans and specifications and solicit bids for construction of two new 60-inch manholes on either side of the siphon in the sewer. DISTRICT Nl. 13 No. U(t): Establish Fords to Account for District Revenues and Expenditures. The resolution attached to the agenda formally authorizes the County Auditor and Treasurer to establish the funds necessary to account for District revenues and expenditures. No. 13 and 14: Report of the Executive Committee. The Committee met on June 26 and enclosed for Board members is a written report of their discussions and recommended actions for con- sideration by the Boards. No. 15: Adoption of Gann Initiative (Proposition 4) Annual Appropriations Limit. The Gann Initiative limits State and local government appropriations of proceeds from tax sources to an amount based on changes in population and the cost of living over the 1978-79 lase year. Each year, the Boards must fix the limit in accordance with the Initiative. In 1985-86 "proceeds of taxes" are well within the appropriations limits as set forth below: 1985-86 District Net 1985-86 District Tax Appropriations Budget Gann Limitation 1 $262,000 $1,740,309 2 2,708,253 7,236,699 3 4,092,775 9,113,843 5 1,237,570 1,874,003 6 930,148 1,090,863 7 1,035,384 2,177,190 -9- July 10, 1985 1985-86 District Net 1985-86 District Tax Appropriations Budget Gann Limitation 11 967,863 1,915,521 13 No tax appropriation budget Not applicable (District is 100% financed by fees) The resolutions appearing on the agenda are to establish the Gann appropriation limits for 1985-86. No. 16: Ratification of Fiscal Policy Committee Activities re Insurance Coverage. Last April the Districts primary excess liability insurance coverage (first $1,000,000) was cancelled and was replaced with a new policy at a substantially higher premium. The secondary level ($1,000,000 to $30,000,000 for 1984-85) expired June 30. As the Directors are aware, the insurance market is in a state of turmoil, and it has been difficult to obtain coverage. At the regular meeting on June 12, the Joint Boards authorized the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate pending quotations received by the Districts' insurance broker and direct the broker to place the desired level of secondary excess liability coverage, subject to ratification or change by the Boards at the July 10 meeting. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on June 26 and evaluated the option. Enclosed with the agenda material is a separate report from the Wmmmittee on the actions it took. The items appearing on the agenda are to ratify the Committee's actions. No. 17: verbal Report and Recommendations of Select Advisory Conmmittee re Sludge Management Agreement with END Systems. At the September 12, 1985 meeting of the Joint Boards, the Directors approved a Sludge Management Agreement with EEO Systems/Orange County, Ltd. to haul and reuse or dispose of 100% of the sludges generated by the Districts' two treatment facilities. The agreement, which commits the Districts to pay IIW $10 per wet ton of sludge removed from the plants cnharencing on July 7, 1986, establishes various milestones that END must meet to ensure that the company is capable of accepting the Districts' sludges on July 1, 1986. The first milestone to be net by ERD was to acquire/lease a site (by February 15, 1985) at which the company would construct and operate a facility to process the approximately 2,500 tons per week of sludge generated in our treatment facilities. ES® encountered difficulties in obtaining a site in Orange county and the Boards extended the milestone date 60 days. )3m has since acquired an outrof-county site and has requested an extension of other milestone dates and an adjustment of the longer hauling distance. -10- July 10, 1985 The Select Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday July 10, imme- diately preceding the regular Joint Board meeting to consider ERO's request. The C:mnittee will verbally report its reco nendations to the Directors at the Board Meeting. No. 18: Awarding Contract for Ocean Monitoring Services, Specification No. 5-032, Required by New NPDES Permit. As a condition of the new NPDES ocean discharge permit jointly issued by the EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Districts must conduct an extensive monitoring program designed to charac- terize the effects of our discharge on the ocean envirornpnt. The Districts have conducted an ocean monitoring program for mrore than 15 years. However, the tasks of the new program are so unprecedented in their scope, that it is beyond the existing capabilities of the Districts. For this reason staff remmiended, and the Boards approved, procedures and a time schedule for hiring an oceanographic firm to conduct the monitoring program during the five-year term of the permit. Requests for Proposals were sent to all known West (oast firms and individuals capable of performing all or parts of the program and notices were published in accordance with the Districts' procurement procedures. On May 29 a total of seven proposals were received ranging in cost from $728,326 to $2,193,707. Districts' personnel (from the laboratory, Treatnpnt Plant Evaluation Group and computer staff) reviewed each firm's approach to technical issues, data handling and interpretation, and manage- ment of the project. Staff also conducted on-site visits to determine the capabilities of potential contractors. Based on this review, five proposals were found to be responsive. The Selection Oommittee interviewed Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), the firm with the overall best and lowest cost proposal, and a fee of $917,680 has been negotiated for the first period of the program. One of the respondents, Jacobs Environmental, proposed a lesser fee. However, their proposal is not responsive to the REP, and the O.xmmittee recommends that it be rejected. The Selection Comnitte has noted for the Boards information that the requirements of this extensive monitoring program have been established by the EPA and it is the first of its kind. Although the EPA has yet to fully define all of the work that is to be accomplished, the NPDES Permit requires that the work commence immediately. Because of this, as the Program proceeds and the requirements are refined, it will be necessary to modify the contract to provide for the changes that will be required. The items appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection OxMittee Report and to award the contract for Ocean Monitoring Services to Science Applications International Corporation for the lump sum amount of $917,680. -11- July 10, 1985 No. 19: Receive, File and Certify Final ElR for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment Disposal Facilities Master Plan and Approving said Master Plan. Enclosed with your agenda material is a staff report and summary of the Final Environmental Lrpact Report on the Joint Treatment Forks Wastewater Master Plan. The staff report outlines and summarizes the oom- ments received on the Draft EIR and the responses that are included in the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared by K. P. Lindstrom and Associates, Environmental Consultant. Also enclosed with your agenda material is a copy of the Final Environmental Impact Report and a copy of Proposed Resolution No. 85-119 making findings and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination. The consultant will present a verbal report to the Directors at Wednesday's meeting. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the staff report and mrments submitted on the Draft Environmental Brpact Report, receive, file and certify the Final Envirormental Impact Report, approve Resolution No. 85-119 and approve the 1983 Master Plan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities, as amended. DISTRICT ID. 1 No. 21: Adjourn to July 18 at 7:30 p.m, at Santa Ana City Hall for Hearing On Proposal To Collect User Fees on Property Tax Bill Beginning in 1985-86. At the May 29, 1985 adjourned meeting, the Board approved revisions to its supplemental user-fee ordinance to change the basis of the user fee to a water meter size-based approach and also reduced the fee levels ori- ginally set by the Board last October. During the course of the Board's deliberations over the past year, the Board has favored collection of the annual user-fee on the property tax bill as the most cost-effective means and has directed the staff to work with the County of Orange to implement this collection approach. Use of the property tax bill is the collection method employed by Districts Nos. 5, 6 and 13, all of which have a similar fee. In order to implement this collection method, state law requires that the District notify all property owners and hold a public hearing to con- sider use of this method. The Board has fixed Thursday, July 18, at 7:30 p.m. in the Santa Ana City Council Chambers as the time and place for the hearing. Acoordingly, the Board should adjourn to 7:30 p.m. Thursday, July 18, 1985, at the Santa Ana city Council Chamber to conduct said hearing. -12- r RE : AGENDA ITEM #8 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS OF NOMINEES FOR JOINT CHAIRMAN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7010 (714)540-2910 (714)982-2411 July 3, 1985 TO: Directors, Orange County Sanitation Districts It is gratifying to be nominated to repeat my term as Joint Chairman for the Orange County Sanitation Districts. It has been my privilege to serve in this capacity for the past 15 months. At this time, I would like to take the opportunity to review the accomplishments of this period. It is appropriate to observe that many items have an extremely long time table and only a single point has been noted. This point clearly reflects past activities and recognizes an obligation for future actions. Many items clearly revolve around the politics of our business. Certainly the major accomplishment of our 301(h) permit fits this category. Receiving this EPA authorization is significant since we were the first major organization in �..� the country to get it. With the contract for carrying out the monitoring program in place, a new challenge exists to both clearly satisfy EPA standards, but at the same time to forge new ground in our understanding of wastewater treatment and ocean discharge. Although effort has been spent during the past 15 months for an analytical approach to disposal of sludge in the ocean, it is disappointing to not have Congressional approval as yet. However, since we believe in what we are trying to do, we must continue to work on it. Completion of the formation of District 13 has been achieved and is now functioning as we had intended. The major controversial points have been addressed in the formation of District 14 and we now seem to be on a well controlled timetable for completion. Both of these District formations have been significant efforts to work a fair compromise between very controversial points of view. Success in making these items happen is very rewarding. The most difficult political issue which has been addressed has been the "Stringfellow" issue. On the one hand, well conceived technical programs have been proposed and supported by the Districts. On the other hand, strong personal feelings have had legitimate concerns that deserved attention. With the issue now resolved, including appropriate diversion facilities, it appears that we are on the right track. The recent presentation by SAWPA has helped us understand the total basin plan objectives requiring attention and coordination between agencies. 7 r �- Directors, Orange County Sanitation Districts July 3, 1985 Page 2 V A separate but equally important dimension of the last 15 months, in addition to politics, is people. With the retirement of Fred Harper and the appointment of Wayne Sylvester as General Manager, many new learning experiences have been required. However, as you all know, we decided that this transition would be the time for fundamental management reform. We have, therefore, made an organizational change to an orthodox management arrangement. Thus, many individuals have been confronted with new management challenges since they now have a much broader span of responsibility and we see that significant strides have been made. To participate in the evolution of this personal growth, where a much broader capability is reflected by the entire professional staff, has been exciting. Paralleling this has been the direction to embark on a building expansion. This will be very significant since the architect is not only directed to design adequate square footage for all employees, but also to improve the basic plan to make the facility representative of long term District needs. Of course, the most visible elements which have been viewed during the last 15 months is not politics or people, but projects. The large number of projects which continually demand our attention is mind-boggling. It would be difficult if it only reflected reaction to past problems. However, most of our projects clearly reflect an enlightened attitude to a better environment. Also, the long term needs of the District are clearly being given proper attention. The new outfall booster at Plant No. 2 and headworks at Plant No. 1 clearly _ reflect an alert posture for the long term future of the Districts. Clearly, we are preparing ourselves for continued future needs. It has been particularly gratifying to share in the evolution of odor control through covers and efficient power generation through central units. We have. progressed through careful analytical studies to scope the problems and get specific engineering direction. This commitment has resulted in a positive Board policy toward improving air quality, both in terms of instituting the odor control program to be better neighbors as well as reducing sulfide content and other emissions in cooperation with AQMD. The studies have led to a number of interrelated contracts which will fulfill these goals in an optimum fashion. With all engineering design contracts now in place and some in construction, we have embarked on a program that already has national attention. It goes without saying that I have been excited to be a player in these many tasks. I welcome the opportunity to continue to contribute. �S irnncceeerre l y, (,/��/ Richard B. figar V Joint Chairman / r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272841127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 July 3, 1985 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS/DON R. GRIFFIN I have been an elected official for 20 years. During my 11 years on the Buena Park City Council, I have been mayor three times. I am a private, practicing, planner-architect in Orange County and have headed my own firm for the past 25 years. I am a member of the American Institute of Architects and a graduate of USC. Past involvement includes President of the Buena Park Chamber of Commerce. . This past year I have been the Vice Joint Chairman of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. I have also been the Alternate Commissioner representing the Sanitation Districts on SCCWRP (Southern California Coastal Water Research Project)) . AV- Don R. Griffin Vice Joint Chairman %RE- AGENDA ITEM #11(s) - DISTRICT 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 30, 1985 RO.BOY 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 1084A ELUS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CAUFORNIA 92708-7018 71A1540-2910 P141962-2411 STAFF REPORT Blockage on Golden West Trunk Sewer Background In early January of this year, a blockage was encountered in the Golden West Trunk Sewer north of Warner Avenue at its crossing of the Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel . On an emergency basis, the line was repaired at a cost of $17,723. The location of the blockage has been a problem area for maintenance for many years and has required frequent cleanings in order to maintain sewage flow. Since the blockage, the District has investigated the situation and determined what can be done to improve the condition. The first task was getting the line clean enough so that a TV inspection could be performed. This required a two-stage cleaning process to remove the accumu- lated greases. Recently the section was TV'd and it was confirmed that the siphon under the flood control channel has a sag that exists for a couple of hundred feet, as shown on the attached drawing. The original plans do not indi- cate a sag. The sag probably came about due to settlement caused by the flood control structure which was placed after the line was installed. The soil in that area is very unstable peat. There are several ways to deal with the problem, however the most cost effective is the construction of manholes on each side of the siphon which will allow better access to the sagged portion for periodic cleanings. Staff estimates that the manholes will cost about $20,000 each, for a total of $40,000. The attached map shows the location of the sag, flood control channel , existing manholes and the proposed new manholes. Recommendation Authorize staff to proceed with preparation of plans and contract documents and solicit bids for the construction of two new 60-inch access manholes on the Golden West Trunk Sewer. Upon receipt of bids, a recommendation for award of a contract will be submitted to the Board for approval . TMD:ja i W 0 Y W Z 6 cc cc J F- 2 w W OF z Z EXIST. MH o STA. 35+24 O SCALE 1"- 100 NEW MH STA. 34+49 in a n } 0 o OCFCD CHANNEL I NEW MH o STA. 32+49 co LU co > LU z EXIST. MH < STA. 29+t9 ' O t- PROPOSED MANHOLES GOLDENWEST TRUNK SEWER JUNE 1985 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS - .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA A BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALMY.CAUMANIA 0272E-8127 1 OBA4 EWS AVENUE \/ FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAOFOANIA 82708-7018 M41 W-2910 July 2, 1985 o14)e52-2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE June 26, 1985 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Present: Others Present: Richard B. Edgar, Joint Chairman Director Michael Beverage Don R. Griffin, Vice Joint Chairman Director Gene Wisner Robert Hanson Director James Neal Buck Catlin Suzanne Atkins, General Counsel 's Office Don Roth James Sharp, Districts' SCCWRP Evelyn Hart Representative James Wahner Dan Smith Staff Present: Ruth Bailey Supervisor. Roger Stanton J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Blake P. Anderson, Director of Convene: 5:30 p.m. Operations Adjourn: 7:45 p.m. Bill Butler, Director of Finance Tom Dawes, Deputy Chief Engineer Gary Streed, Chief Administrative Assistant 1) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations. The Fiscal Policy Committee reported on matters considered at its June 18th meeting and submitted recommendations as set forth below: a) Districts' Investment Policy. Last fall the State Legislature enacted legislation requiring the finance officers of all public agencies with invested funds to: • provide an annual report to the agency' s governing body containing a statement of the agency's investment policy. -1- Executive Committee Report June 26, 1985 - • provide a monthly report to agency management and its governing body which outlines detailed data on all investments made by the agency. By law the County Treasurer is the ex-officio treasurer of the Districts and all District funds are deposited in the County Treasury. The County Auditor is the ex officio auditor of the Districts and all disbursements are made on County Auditor's Warrants drawn by the Districts. Because of this statutory relationship, the Districts' General Counsel is recommending that the Boards adopt the County Treasurer' s Annual Statement of Investment Policy as the Districts' policy and direct that the monthly reports be sent to the County Auditor Controller. Mr. Woodruff' s office has drafted the enclosed resolution to effect that policy in compliance with the statute. Fiscal Polic Committee Recommendation. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends approva of the Resolution adopting the County Treasurer's Annual Statement of Investment Policy and requesting the County Auditor Controller to review the County Treasurer's Monthly Investment Reports, on behalf of the Districts, as recommended by the General Counsel. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendations of the Fiscal Policy Committee. b) Office Automation/Word Processing System Upgrade. Enclosed is a staff proposal to upgrade the District's existing office automation/word processing system, originally installed in 1981. Staff estimates that we have avoided adding four clerical positions at a net cost savings of over $150,000 by utilizing this equipment since the initial installation in 1981. Staff is recommending that the existing CPT Word Processing System be upgraded to a centralized shared resource system with graphics capabilities to offset the projected workload increases in our industrial waste, laboratory, engineering, and maintenance divisions, and to accommodate the requirements of the recently authorized public information office. The estimated initial capital outlay necessary for the system upgrade is $108,611. However, because the expanded system will preclude the necessity of adding a minimum of 3.75 clerical employees over the next three years, it is projected that the system upgrade will result in a net cost avoidance of $77,153 over that period. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation. The Fiscal Policy Committee believes that the proposed system upgrade will not only enhance the Districts' clerical capabilities, but improve the overall efficiency and result in considerable cost avoidance in clerical expenses during the life of the equipment. The Committee recommends approval of the y word processing system upgrade. -2- Executive Committee Report June 26, 1985 Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Po icy Committee Recommendation. 2) 1985-86 Individual District's Bud et Recommendations. The Committee reviewed the staf 's preliminary 985- 6 budgets for the indiviaual Districts which incorporate each Districts' share of the Joint Works budgets approved by the Boards on June 12th. The budgets total $250.2 million, an increase of 13% over 1984-85. Approximately 12% of the budget is for operations and 1% is for debt retirement. The balance is for construction of master plan sewerage facilities and authorized reserves. For the coming fiscal year adequate funding is available for all Districts. Districts Nos. 1, 5, 6, and 13 have previously adopted user fee programs. All other Districts' operating costs will continue to be funded by ad valorem taxes. The Committee recommends adoption of the proposed budgets for 1985-86. A detailed transmittal is contained in the enclosed bound report. If any Director needs additional information, please call Wayne Sylvester or Bill Butler at (714) 540-2910. 3) Southern California Coastal Water Research Pro 'ect (aSCCWRE) Briefin . rcPro3ectsst The SouthernCalifornia oasts Water Resea a i n 1969 to conduct objective oceanographic monitoring and research projects on the effect of the discharge of treated waste to the coastal waters of California from Point Conception to the Mexican Border. SCCWRP employs scientists in specialty areas such as physics, chemistry, biochemistry, benthic ecology, fishery biology, marine biology, and histopathology. SCCWRP is a joint powers organization consisting of our Districts, the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, the Ventura Regional County Sanitation District, and the City of San Diego. Annual funding is provided by member agencies in the total amount of $700,000 per year, and additional funding is provided through grants from EPA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) . On April 3rd, Willard Bascom the Director of SCCWRP for the past 12 years, announced his retirement effective July 1, 1985. Recently, press accounts have devoted considerable space to the issue of the impacts on marine life of historical discharges of DDT and PCB to the ocean, particularly in the Los Angeles area. Prior to being outlawed in the early 1970's, these chemicals were discharged by companies in large quantities. As the Committee members are aware SCCWRP, and its Director, because of their extensive ocean research work, have been drawn into the public discussion which is summarized in the enclosed L.A. Times article. Also enclosed is a press release recently issued by the SCCWRP Board of Commissioners following their review of the matter, and an updated table relative to present DDT and PCB limitations and risk assessments previously discussed with Directors. Former Director James Sharp, the Districts' Representative on the SCCWRP Commission, attended the Executive Committee meeting and updated the Directors on these recent SCCWRP activities. -3- Executive Committee Report June 26, 1985 4) Department Head Salary Range Adjustment Pursuant to the Management Peformance Review Pro ram (MPRP). The Joint Chairman convened the Executive Committee in c osed session to consider Department Head Salary Range Adjustments pursuant to the Management Performance Review Program (MPRP) adopted by the Boards last year. Enclosed is a separate confidential report and recommendation from the Committee. -If any Director wishes to further discuss the report or recommendation, the Joint Chairman will adjourn the Boards into closed session at the meeting. ee -4- RESOLUTION NO. 85-108 ADOPTING COUNTY TREASURER'S ANNUAL '..� STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY, AND AUTHORIZING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO REVIEW THE COUNTY TREASURER'S MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORTS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING COUNTY TREASURER'S INVESTMENT POLICY, AND AUTHORIZING COUNTY AUDITOR- CONTROLLER TO REVIEW THE COUNTY TREASURER'S MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORTS WHEREAS, the State Legislature, by statute, adopted and chaptered as Chapter 1226 of the 1984 Statutes, amended California Goverment Code Sections 53630 and 53646(a) , relating to investment policies of local agencies; and, WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 53646(a) , the Treasurer or Chief Fiscal Officer of each public agency shall- annually render to the legislative `..' body of the local agency, a statement of investment policy; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 53646(b) , the Treasurer or Chief Fiscal Officer shall render a monthly report to the Chief Executive Officer and legislative body of the 1"ocal- agency, showing the type of investment, the institution, the date of maturity, the amount of deposit, the current market value for all securities with a maturity of more than 12 months, the rate of interest, and such data as may be required by the local agency; and, WHEREAS, the Sanitation Districts are organized pursuant to the Sanitation District Act, and Section 4732 thereof establishes the County Auditor as the ex of£icio auditor of the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Chief Fiscal Officer of the Districts is the Director of Finance; and, �...' WHEREAS, all revenues received by the Districts and expenditures made by the -I- Districts from its several fonds, including general operating fund, capital outlay revolving fund, and miscellaneous bond funds, are maintained and �. controlled by the Auditor of the County of Orange as ex officio auditor of the County Sanitation Districts; and, WHEREAS, the investment of all surplus funds owned by the Districts are made by the County Treasurer, on behalf of the Districts, NOW THEREFORE, the Hoards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That they adopt the annual-statement of Treasurer Investment Policies required by state law, of the County Treasurer of the County of Orange attached hereto as Exhibit "A•, as the Districts' statement of investment policy. Section 2: That the County Treasurer is requested to render a monthly `. report to the Districts' Director of Finance and General Manager, and to the County Auditor-Controller for review, which report shall- be deemed to be the report of the Districts. Section 3: That all funds of the Districts maintained and controlled by the County Auditor and invested by the County Treasurer shall be invested in accordance with the adopted annual statement of Treasurer Investment Policies of the County Treasurer. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. -2- :PSne 12, 1985 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFONNIA PO Box Bt2T FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFOPNIA 9272E-8127 t OBAA EW B AVENUE AWWAIN VALLEY.CAUFOPNIA 92ME-101 B v ntm saals+0 9+41 M2-2471 OFFICE AUTOMATION/WORD PROCESSING SYSTEM UPGRADE STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY In 1981, following a comprehensive study, the Boards approved implementation of an office automation system and authorized an initial installation of three CPT stand-alone word processors. Over the past four years the Districts have purchased six additional stand-alone units from CPT Corporation. These units are each self-contained and are dedicated to word processing. Staff estimates we have avoided adding four clerical positions, at a net cost savings' of over $150,000 during this four year period by utilizing this equipment. Recent and projected increases in work loads, required staffing levels, and office automation requirements have caused us to re-evaluate our word processing capabilities. Staff is recommending that the existing CPT Word Processing System be upgraded to a centralized shared resource system with graphics capabilities to offset the projected work load increases in our Industrial Waste, Laboratory, Engineering and Maintenance Divisions " and to accommodate the requirements of the recently authorized Public Information Office. This recommendation is consistent with the original 1981 report which recognized that a significant advantage of the CPT System at that time was the ability to "expand by adding compatible dual or single disk equipment and/or centralized shared resource processing equipment. " The estimated initial capital outlay necessary for the new system is $108,611.00. However, because the expanded system will preclude the necessity of adding 3. 75 clerical employees over the next three years, it is projected that the system upgrade will result in a net cost avoidance of $77, 153. 00 over that period. NEED TO UPGRADE WORD PROCESSING SYSTEM Increased Work Load: Over the next five years our facilities master plans set forth a construction program of over $200 million; our industrial waste enforcement program will result in a 100% increase in industrial and commercial permittees; and our laboratory work load will increase significantly to support the extensive ocean monitoring and other reporting requirements of our new NPDES permit. -1- In addition, during the past year the Boards have added a Public Information Office to respond to increased requests for information about the Districts, to implement an ongoing public education program, and to coordinate our relations with the news media. In order to support the ongoing needs of this office, as well as the internal Board and staff needs, we need to enhance our ability to produce informational graphics. These graphics would be suitable for use in _presentations to the Board, and to the public, internal technical reports, and annual reports to regulatory agencies. At the present time we must redirect the efforts of an in-house draftsperson to meet these requirements as our existing word processors do not have any graphics capabilities. This method is both expensive and time consuming, causing other work to be delayed.All of this will substantially increase our clerical work load and require major expansion to our office automation system to efficiently handle the day to day requirements. System Enhancements: As a result of using word processors for the last 4 years we have accumulated many "floppy disks" full of information, reports, and correspondence. Oftentimes we need to refer to these ' documents in order to prepare additional information for ongoing projects or to review and/or update Board actions. Now we have two choices: we either go to the file drawer and search for a hard copy, or look through the disks for the original. Both of these options are time consuming and limit access to only one person at a time. If, for example, one average clerk were to spend only 20 minutes a day searching for this type of information, it would result in an annual cost of nearly $1, 400. 00 (approximately $13,000 for all nine work stations) . If the staff person writing the report were to do the search, the costs would be even higher. A centralized system would allow all of this information currently stored on individual "floppy disks" to be automatically transferred to the centralized system and retrieved promptly as a shared resource whenever needed. The organizational structure and management style of the Districts often require different work stations to work on the same program simultaneously. The proposed system upgrade would allow each work station instantaneous access to the same documents and information within the system. It would also allow a single station to be "in charge" and pick and choose pieces of information from participating work stations to put together a summary or a final report. With our existing stand-alone word processors this search must be done manually and then the information re-entered. As our organizational requirements have grown, more of our management/ administrative staff are involved in the preparation of required supporting staff reports and the clerical processing. It is not now possible for one work station to have a monitoring/controlling over- view of the entire process or for one station to "borrow" work already done at another station. With recent technological advances data can be centralized and the proposed centralized system will enable this, which will significantly increase our efficiency. v -2- ALTERNATIVES Purchase Microcomputers: Today' s microcomputers all have software packages for graphics available. Such a system could be used in the Public Information Office. One disadvantage of this approach is that the graphics could not be integrated into original documents except as separate pages or exhibits. Also the keyboard and commands for each microcomputer are unique and would not be well known to other CPT operators, requiring either a dedicated "graphics operator" or reduced efficiency when graphics are needed. There are also word processing software packages available for microcomputers. such a package, combined with a new multi-user microcomputer system would allow more than one user to access a single document and would also provide graphics interface. However, most multi-user microcomputers are limited to three work stations without establishing a local network. In addition the word processing packages are not as convenient, efficient, or powerful as those for dedicated word processors because of the intense file updating required for word processing. , As in the first case, the operating procedures, keyboard layout and special functions would not be standardized as they are for our existing CPT equipment, which would make cross-training and back-up work difficult. Modify Existing Accounting Mini-computer: The mini-computer recently purchased for financial and historical record keeping has sufficient speed and capacity to accommodate our text processing needs. It does not, however , have graphics software available. To use this system we would need to purchase new terminals and printers which would degrade the system responsiveness now required by the Accounting Department. This alternative also has the drawback of input terminals and procedures not being standardized with those of our existing word processing system. Further, when the system was "down" we would not only lose our accounting processing, but the office automation/word processing system would also be lost, thus paralyzing the entire clerical effort. We do not believe it will be sound management to "put all of our eggs in one basket" . Upgrade Existing CPT Word Processing System: CPT Corporation, the manufacturer of our existing equipment, has developed a system called the Phoenix which has graphics capability as well as being a dedicated word processor. This system can be used by four work stations simultaneously, has on-line storage capacity of 30 megabytes (the equivalent of 90 floppy disks) and uses a similar keyboard and operating protocol as our existing word processors. Through the CPT Office Dialog System, the Phoenix would be able to share information and resources with our existing stand-alone word processors. The Office Dialog System (ODS) has several other attractive features. It offers up to an additional gigabyte of storage (approximately 3,400 floppy disks or 400,000 pages) and incorporates a total text search. v -3- Combining these features would allow staff to store reports, correspondence and files, and to recall them based upon any word or group of words contained therein within an average of four secconds. Another useful feature is a spelling corrector containing 72, 000 standard words, allowing for 1500 words unique to the Districts, and checking phonetically for proper spelling. The ODS supports 16 work stations without upgrading and can be expanded to support nearly 400. These work stations can be CPT Word Processors, microcomputers, or terminals, allowing access to users who don' t require a dedicated word processor . To further increase productivity the standard ODS provides for electronic mail, scheduling, and speed typing (an ability to type up to 239 characters for a stored code or abbreviation) . Other features such as a full relational data base management system and communications ability with other computer systems are also included. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends we upgrade and expand our existing CPT Word Processing System for the features stated above and for the reasons set forth in the original May 5, 1981 Recommendations for Acquisition of a Word Processing System. The recommended system upgrade configuration is to purchase five word processing work stations which should allow us to avoid filling a minimum of two clerical positions over the next three year period. Two of these stations should be part of a Phoenix System to provide graphics capability and to support the PIO. Staff also recommends we purchase a CPT Office Dialog System (ODS) in order to network/interface our existing and proposed work stations. We estimate that the total text search feature alone should increase efficiency the equivalent of an additional 1.75 persons over the three year period. In the original 1981 report staff projected a net cost avoidance over a three-year period of $16, 531. 00 , for two clerical positions that would not be filled because of the purchase of three word processing units. As it turned out, nine units have been authorized over the past four years and the total cost avoidance for clerical costs is estimated at over $150,000 for the four year period. These original units, although completely depreciated, and the six subsequent units are still functioning properly and will be reassigned to be an integral part of the network we are now proposing. Because our existing system and hardware are totally compatible with the CPT Phoenix and ODS we would be able to continue to use them as stand-alone units as well as a part of a shared resource system. This is particularly important during down time. -4- • Based upon the projected clerical savings because of the upgraded system' s capabilities of absorbing projected work load increases and enhanced efficiencies, and assuming a three year amortization, consistent with our original evaluation (very conservative when compared to our actual experience) staff projects the following net cost avoidance from the proposed system upgrade: Costs Hardware/software $100,105 Sales tax 6,006 Installation 2,500 $108,611 3 year maintenance contract 13, 500 Total 3 year cost $122, 111 Avoided Costs By Reduction In Added Clerical Employees (Payroll Costs, Incl. Benefits) : From additional units $141,024 From increased capacity/capability 58, 240 Total 3 yr. payroll cost avoided $199, 264 ..r Net 3 year cost avoidance $ 77, 153 -5- Following is a breakdown of the recommended office automation/word processing system upgrade: Increased Public Additional Capacity/ Informati," TOTAL Work Stn. Capability Program 1 CPT Office Dialog System $ 39,990 <39,990 9 ODS to CPT 8100 Interface Kit 4,000 4,000 1 ODS Bundled Software 15,000 15,000 1 CPT Phoenix Graphics System 11,500 $11,500 1 CPT 6-Pen Graphics Plotter 1,895 1,895 1 CPT Phoenix Terminal 2,500 $ 2,500 3 CPT Word Processors 17,220 17,220 , 4 CPT Rotary Printers 8,000 8,000 $100,105 $27,720 $58,990 $13,395 68 Tax 6,006 1,663 3,539 804 Total Equipment & Software $106,111 $29,383 $62,529 $14,199 Estimated Installation Cost 2,500 2,500 Grand Total $108,61.1 $29,383 $65,029 $14,199 The above price includes training for 5 operators and all maintenance for 90 days. Installation cost is to be determined after an inspection but not expected to exceed $2,500.00. -6- �r GGS:sl CrJAStA� 4"JA �9f fSSr:QfLh Southern Call lornia Ccast al Water Research Project 648 West Pacilit Ctast Highway • Lon9 Beach, Calllarnia 90806 • 2131435.7071 PRESS RELEASE 30MAY 85 On Thursday , May 30 , the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority Commission met to review circumstances surrounding the current controversy over interpretations of SCCWRPA data. The Commission agreed with the findings ( see enclosure) of the panel of scientists and engineers that met in Long Beach on May 28 to consider the value of the environmental data produced by SCCWRPA. It was decided by the Commission that the panel ' s report should be .released to the public in its original and full context. Director Willard Bascom suggested during executive session , that a cooling off period on the above matter would be in the best interest of SCCWRPA. The Commission agreed with this suggestion , and both Willard Bascom and David Brown have requested that their respective vacations begin at once • Willard Bascom reaffirmed his original intention to commence his retirement after 12 yekrs of service on July 1 , 1985 as per his request ...i of the Commission earlier this year. Charles Halgren will continue in his position as Administrative Officer for theProject. STANFORD UNIVERSITY ' STA NFORD.CALIFORNIA 94605 PER RY I. ALMERP OFES5an DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING RINGENGINEERING NTER OF CI H.ENGINE PROFESSOR TERMAN ENGINEERING CENTER OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (415)497-393I May 30, 1985 Mr. Wallace Edgerton Chairman, Commission of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority c/o Southern California Coastal Water Research Project 646 West Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, California 90806 Dear Mr. Edgerton: Enclosed is a statement by the panel of scientists and engineers called together in an open meeting on May 28. The purpose was to review charges made by a senior SCCWRP scientist, Dr. David Brown, against the SCCWRP director, Mr. Willard Bascom, in a letter addressed to Assemblyman Tom Hayden and dated May 18. o.i Names of the members of the panel are attached. All participated in the formulation of the statement and approved it unanimously. The panel members request that the statement be released to the press after the Commission members have had an opportunity to review it. Sincerely yours, Perry L. McCarty Panel Chairman .. STATEMENT BY SCCWRP PANEL May 30, 1985 The scientific information produced and published by the Southern Cali- fornia Coastal Water Research Project staff under the direction of Mr. Willard Bascom has been of high quality and of great value to all agencies and indi- viduals interested in the impact of municipal wastewaters discharged into Southern California coastal waters. No one questioned the validity or quality of this published information during the Panel meeting. It was in general highly praised by all sides. This statement is also supported by a press release signed by fourteen SCCWRP senior scientists and dated May 28, 1985. The Panel found no evidence that Mr. Bascom deliberately misled anyone or knowingly supplied false information or withheld information that should have been published. It is common for wide differences of opinion to exist when environmental data is interpreted by knowledgeable scientists of good will and with good intentions. We believe that the differences that have surfaced recently are of this kind. Many of the problems that have resulted can be attributed to the fact that SCCWRP has been and is underfunded. Increased funding would permit an extension of the important data base that has been developed, to allow less controversial interpretation. The Panel believes the procedure used by Dr. David Brown to air his concerns over scientific decisions and practices of SCCWRP and the integrity of the Director is unfortunate. We believe the proper forum should have been the Scientific Consulting Board and the Commission of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority. MEMBERS OF SCCWRP PANEL Prof. Perry McCarty Stanford University Chairman of SCCWRP Consulting Board Expert on chemical contamination matters Prof. Grover Stephens U.C. Irvine Member of Consulting Board Dean of Biological Sciences Prof. Edward Goldberg Scripps Inst. Oceanography Ex-member of Consulting Board Internationally known expert on marine pollution _ Prof. Erman Pearson U.C. Berkeley Ex-member of Consulting Board International consultant Dr. Reuben Lasker National Marine Fisheries Service .r Ex-member of Consulting Board Expert on fish in southern California waters Prof. Isaac Kaplan U.C.L.A. Distinguished chemist President of Global Geochemistry Prof. Robert Wiegel U.C. Berkeley Internationally known coastal engineer Prof. Roger Revelle U.C. San Diego Winner of Tyler Ecology Prize in 1984 Ex-director of Scripps Inst. of Oceanography David A. Brown , 5479 Fairbrock Street , Long Beach , CA 90815 May le, 1995 Mr. Tom Hayden, Member, California State Assembly, , State Capitol , - Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear -Mr. Hayden, On May 17, 1985, at the meeting of the Assembly Task Force on Investigation of Toxic Pollution in Santa Manica. Bay, you asked me if I had any comments on Mr. Bascon's presentation. I had no comments at that time. However , in retrospect, I think, I should have been more candid. Presentations like Mr. Bascom's leave everyone confused. It would seem as if two different stories are being told from _ the same set of data: that of Mr. Bascom's and that of the SCCWRP staff. Mr. Bascom 's presentations portray coastal southern California as in good condition., perhaps even enhanced by. the discharge of sewage into the ocean. For instance; Mr. Bascom claims that there are more fish around. outfalls and more biomass in Santa Monica Bay because of one discharge of nutrients in sewage.. As he has be-an quoted in the newspapers, "That (sewer pipe) -.just plain feeds a lot cf. animals. For them, it 's food". Since Mr. Bascom is the . director and therefore tho spokesman of SCCWRP, r..cst heads of other agencies (e.g. , like Mr. Hertel , the former E::ecutive Officer of the RWOCB) hear Mr. Bascom's interpretation of the data and conclude that coastal southern 'California is' invery good condition. However, there are other interpretations of the data.. - . Take for example Mr. Bascom's presentation of May 17, 1985. Mr. Bascom told the Assembly Task Farce t:iat tnere were more fish around the so-called seven mile outfall in Santa Monica Bay. 'What he didn't tell you was that his conclusions were based an to 5 trawls depending upon the location trawled (control or outfall ) ; whereas, as wa reported in the SCCWRP 19131-92 Biennial Report (page 94) , 17 to 29 trawls are 'needed bef-ore any adequate statistical evaluation of the data can be made. In other words, what you saw were random numbers. At any given time, 2 to 5 other trawls could have been done and produced the opposite results. In.-Fact, we have done just that. However , Mr. Bascom does not report those results. The bottom line is, that without 17 to29 trawls (which we have never done) far outfall and control stations, respectively, no valid conclusions with respect to number of fish can be drawn. Mr. Bascom should know this because he edited the entire 1981-S2 report. In addition,* be, has been given this information -l- repeatedly in public and private meetings. Despite these warnings, Mr. Bascom continues to present this data publicly. He even went as far as to give the same trawl data V.' that he showed you yesterday to the L.A. Times. They published it on July 15, 1964, long after Mr. Bascom should . have known that the data was invalid. This leaves an unsuspecting public and unsuspecting officials with false information. Another thing Mr�—Bascom didn 't tell you yesterday was that the fish in the photograph of the trawl catch he showed you from the seven mile outfall in Santa Monica Bay were almost entirely white croakers. Here we arrive at the heart of the human health problem. As you know-, white croakers are the most contaminated sportfish in southern California. The reason they are so contaminated is largely due to the fact that they are attracted *to sewage outfalls because they feed on polychaete worms which dominant the bottom-livi.n.g communities near outfalls. Since the outfalls are the source of contaminants, animals which feed near them will be the most contaminated. This is particularly bad news for sportfishermen because white croakers are the most abundantly caught sportfish- -in southern California. Mr. Bascom showed a relatively low (1 in 13,888 or 7.2/100,000) lifetime (70 yr) cancer risk for consuming sportfish from Santa Monica Bay. It- should be noted that Mr. `.✓ Bascom's calculations were based an a consumption rate of .9..3 g/day, which is the U. S. national average per capita consumption rate for domestic coastal fish, and did not include any white croakers. However , the average .sportfisherman in southern California eats four times as much fish as this national average while ten percent of the 160,000 sportfishermen in southern California eat 15 times as much fish as those upon which Mr. Bascom based his risk calculations. In addition, in southern California, one-third of the consumed catch is white croakers. Based an these facts, the lifetime cancer risk for sportfishmen consuming fish from the center of Santa Monica Bay would be 3.2/I0s000 for the average sportfisherman and 2.2/1.,000 for those consuming at the ninety percentile consumption rate.. It is important to realize that a large portionof the so-called sportfishermen in southern California are not fishing- for sport but rather as a source of food. Many of these people are unemployed and depend upon fish for a source of protei.n up to seven days- per week. It is these consumers who are at the greatest' risk in southern California. Mr. -Bascom showed you a map of a .rather small area (4 square km) of the bottp of .Santa Monica Bay where he considered there to be significant changes in the V/ assemblages of bottom-living invertebrates. This again is based upon Mr. Bascom's interpretation of the data. Mr. Bascom based his conclusions upon the number of square miles -2- in which the total number of species of invertebrates was decreased. What he didn ' t tell you was that number of speci.es can be a very misleading parameter. What really matters is not the number of species but rather the species diversity or the balance of species. For e:;ample, a non-contaminated control area with 191"l total individual invertebrates might contain ten each of ten species of invertebrates , while a contaminated might also contain 104 individuals but with 90 of one species and one each of the other nine species. The control area would have high species diversity and a balanced,.indigenous population ,- while the contaminated area would have low species diversity and would not have a balanced indigenous population. On this basis at least 58 square km of the bottom of Santa Monica Bay centered on the L. A. City Hyperion outfall does not have a balanced indigenous population of invertebrates. A similarly _ affected area at least 94 square km exists around the L.A. County JWPCP' outfall at Palos Verdes.. The Regulators (e. g , , the Environmental Protection Agency) and most ecologists base their evaluations of extent of effects on the basis of balanced indigenous populations , not total number of species as Mr. Bascom presented to you on May 17 , 1988. . Mr.. Bascom 's . photographs offish swimming around out-Falls as evidence of normal conditions are completely invalid. scientifically .and can present a di.stortad view of reality. As e::plained above, even with low species diversity there might be no reduction in the total number of species .mp/ present. Thus, if enough photographs are taken , it might be possible to obtain a photograph, of any one of a number. of different species of fish swimming past a sewer outfall . What these photographs do not show is whether there is a balanced indigenous population of fish. Only adequate trawl data that is analyzed using proper statistical protocols can show this. Dr. Jeff Cross of SCCWRP has used trawl data to show conclusively that both number of species and species diversity of bottom-feeding fish are reduced within 2 km of the L. R. City Hyperion outfall and within 10 km of the L. A. County outfall . Fish populations around these out-Falls are dominated by white croakers and Dover sole. These are the most contaminated fish in southern California coastal waters. Mr. Bascom stated that we have concluded that there are only a handful of contaminants which are of importance because these are the only ones which are highly fat soluble and therefore likely to be retained in the bcdy. Most toxicologist. would agree that fat salubility is an important parameter when assessing the potential. for long-term toxicity. However , of the highly fat soluble compounds on Mr. Bascom 's very short list , we routinely measure only two: that is DDTs and PCBs. What he didn 't tell you was that we v, don 't routinely measure the other compounds on his very snort list. For example} we have never measured toxaphene -3- which is ten times more fat soluble than DDTs and PCBs. He also didn 't tell you that we don 't routinely measure a number of compounds which were not on his list but which we know are just as fat soluble as PCBs and DDTs but present at much higher levels in southern California coastal waters. `..✓ Here I am referring to the petroleum-derived polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) . Dr. Robert Eganheuse, a former SCCWRP employee, went on to do research .at UCLA and demonstrated that in 1979, 7,840 metric tons of PAH9 were discharged in municipal wastewater. This can be compared with 0.7 metric tons of DDTs and 1 . 4 metric tans of PCBs -for same year. PAHs can be a serious health hazard. The PAH benzopyrene is three times as carcinogenic as PCBs and thirty times as carcinogenic as DDTs. There are many other compounds we know about and many more that we don 't know about that we are not measuring. Why aren 't we measuring them? Because Mr. Bascom has concluded that these are not a _ _ problem. Mr. Bascom showed you evidence that concentrations. of DDTs and PCBs are decreasing in southern California coastal sediments and organisms. Mr. Bascom showed you decreases of sediment concentrations of DDTs at Palos Verdes which is the major reservoir of DDTs in southern. California. What he -didn ' t tell you -is that there is evidence to. indicate that that the peak, concentrations of DDT at Palos Verdes are decreasing because the DDT contamination is spreading to a wider area of coastal southern California. What he also didn 't tell you was that in our 19OZ 94 Biennial Report, while we show concentrations of DDTs and PCBs decreasing in Dover sole with time, we show them increasing in Pacific sanddabs. In addition , recent studies have shown that DDT in white croakers from near the Cabrillo Pier in the L.A. harbor has increased from 1 . 7- ppm in 1980 to 2.6 ppm in 1985. Unfortunately, we have no other measurements because Mr. Bascom has decided that we shouldn 't be making these types of measurements anymore. In fact , Mr. Bascom turned _ down a very large sum of money that was offerad to us to repeat (with modifications) the 1980-81 seafood study. I could go on with comments on Mr. Bascom's interpretation of the data, but I think it would be more useful if you or someone on your staff spent several hours with the scientists of SCCWRP for a thorough explanation as to the real. status of coastal southern Calfornia.. Please contact anyone of us if you or your staff would be interested. Finally, I believe you asked me whether there had ever - been any pressure on me with regards to providing results -which might be pleasing to the sponsors (the city and county sanitation districts of southern California) . As I said I felt as though there was some pressure from Mr. Bascom on � . this issue. For example, last fall Mr. Bascom read a prepared statement to myself and Jeff Cross of SCCWRP. I was so taken aback by the statement he read that I made a point of photocopying it. My interpretation of the statement was. that Mr. Bascom believed that SCCWRP was established and continued to be supported because it ' s research would show that secondary treatment was unnecessary. I have enclosed a . photocopy of the handwritten statement that Mr. Bascom read to its , as well as a transcribed typed version. You may read these and decide for yourself as to whether there was any pressure from Mr. Bascom. Please note that this pressure was from Mr. Bascom, not the sponsors. Whether the sponsors put pressure on Mr. Bascom is another issue. , Please feel free to call on me in the future if you have any further questions. Sincerely, David A. Brown , Ph. D. , Director , Chemistry Programs, SCCWRP V V _5_ The following was transcribed from a photocopy of a statement read by Willard Bascom to David .Brown and Jeff Cross during the second week of November , 1984: V/ 10/7/84 Re: The Purpose of SCCWRP I wanted to remind the staff about ,the original purpose of SCCWRP which seems .to have been forgotten by some of you. - It is to provide factual information about the effects of . municipal wastewaters on the coastal waters of southern California. The data we assemble may be used by 'the dischargers to rebutt the unsupported allegations of "environmentalists" or to answer questions and erratic regulations of the ,State or EPA. The main reason why the cities and counties of southern California are willing to pay for our studies is because they are engaged in a Long term struggle with the EPA over whether "secondary treatment" is to be required of every discharger. At stake are: 1 . about a billion dollars in construction .• ... ... „costs in.,southern California alone, 2. about 30 million dollars per year in operations and maintenance costs thereof , U. even more difficult problems of disposing of secondary sludge, - .� 4. other environmental costs including land usage , odors, etc. , S. the rest of the US following California 's lead Our job is to do high quality scientific work that can help define which effects are natural and which are caused _ by man 's activities (especially those which specifically relate to outfalls) . We have the freedom to look into any aspect of real or alleged effectsto find out the truth of- the matter and , if possible , allocate the responsibility. No member of this staff has ever been. deterred from publishing any .findings or expressing any opinion as long as those were supported by adequate data that after consideration we as a group agreed on. The reason we have this freedom is that the original sponsors and Consulting Board believed that the facts, whatever they might turn out to be would. demonstrate that the total costs of secondary treatment (environmental , financial , and other) would be much greater than those: of sea discharge. It is most important that our statements do not e::ceed our evidence-. When all the information needed on . any point is in and thoughtfully digested , there will be ,� plenty of time to tell the public the answers.. We must try to understand the problems of the senior sponsors (heads of discharging agencies) .- The waiver of secondary treatment and accompanying monitoring is their `..� main concern. While waiver action is still being considered behind the scenes in EPA, we must be particularly careful with public statements. It is. said that the recent ruling by Region X EPA that no secondary waivers. would be granted in Puget Sound was somehow. related to public pressures driven by whale deaths (even though there is no known connection between the two) . That may not be the reason for the ruling but I would not like for us to trigger a public 'reacti.on here (based on damage to fish livers) that would give EPA Region IX a political excuse for a similar ruling. When we are finally certain what is normal , what part is caused by DDTs , what part by petroleum, which petroleum came from. outfalls and which from seeps, etc.. —then we will tell the story in scientific papers. The widespread contamination of the Eight with DDT was well told in the 1973 report of this project and we have said at various times that it would be tens of years be-fore its effects disappeared. Although we have some new details now those essential +acts remain the same. I am also concerned about making comparisons only between Puget Sound and southern , Cal iforni a that may make this region loots: unusually contaminated . L believe in comparisons to put findings in perspective. I suggest that New York or Newark , Boston , Providence , San Francisco, Newport Mews , or European disposal regions (Liverpool , Hamburg , Marseille-, Genoa, etc) and some genuine control areas be used as well . At this moment none of us know how these places would stand on a scale of contamination but it seems likely that southern California would be no worse than average. Therefore, to be fair , let us report- several for comparative purposes , some better and some worse. Part II/Monday, May 27, 1985 goo Angeles mimes Are -]� Y . a Fish Safe to Eat? Showdown Expected Tuesday Charges of Cover-Up Coincide With , Stepped-Up Debate Over DDT Peril By ALAN CITRON,T[mes Staff writer In recent years,when authorities wanted to know the truth about toxic contamination in Santa Monica and San Pedro bays,the man they called on ac was Willard Beom, the confident and amiable director of the publicly._ funded Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. As the guiding force behind ' dozens of contamination studies, Beacom came armed with statistics on everything from marine feeding ... habits to human cancer concerns. - What few people realized as they listened to the ailver-haired direc- tor's may assessment of the bays was that at least one of his own top staff members thought that he was misrepresenting the facts. David Brown's accusation last week that his boas played down the toxic threat by distorting scientific findings and attempting to censor staff members incensed Bascom and set the stage for a showdown Tuesday before a tribunal of noted' scientists. At the hearing, which will take place at the research pro*t's of. fice in Long Beach, Beacom and Brown are. expected -to provide' lengthy explanations of. their eAasHa'nme views. The confrontation occur "yyillard Bascom just as the debate over toxic con- ,.. .s, ....t.u__. .. - tamination of off-shore waters is heating up,but the topic is not new. Opponents have quietly battled over contamination since 1970, when a scientist discovered the nation's highest levels of the chem- ical DDT in area sport_!I .. i= Officials in the Middle Sport fishing industry com- COn ens side of the issue is a Plaints aside, most sdeausts agree - --With all the concern about DDT en aftadous environmentalists who that further study of the bays is " . levels, relatively little is known . compare the bays to cesspools. On tv� �n • especially with the re. about how the chemical affects j the other side are people like cent protests about the disposal humans. Most scientiats agree, Bascom, who contend that marine from the Hyperion waste-roster --however, that the ingestion of life actually bas beaebtted in some treatment plant at Playa del Bey. - -large quantities of DDT is likely to ways from the tuns of waste die- The difference between the two - muse serious chromcillnes&, charged into area wafers. issues is that Hyperion represents s - Dr. Harold W. Puffer, a DSC Public officials stand somewhere relatively new controversy and j ' 'pathologist who authored a feder. in the middle. After denying the that concern about the massive �. ally funded survey on the eating esstence of a health threat for -dumping of DDT and other chemi- I habits of local sport fishermen in more than a decade,three agencies le gong back more then other years I �961,contends that the tonics pose recently concluded that local sport da ...asermus threat."We've had severe fish may be hazardous. The state A synthetic.chemical, DDT be- .-Oman pollution for a long time," Department of Health Services ad. mine the country's most widely Puffer said. "What we don't know vised fishermen to stop eating .used pesticide.after World War IL is how many people may have been ..white croaker, the most contami- - Twenty Years later. scientists be-n -damaged by this. . . . I'm very noted species, and recommended Sato re-Ii that the chemical ' confident that there's at least . .that consumers avoid any fish was-'cau®ng serious damage to - somebody out there who Las-can- caught around Whim Point sewer- marine life and bird& By the time ..-cer from consuming animals from age outfail off Palos Vendee, the the pesticide was taken off. the i __our crostline." Gerald Desmond Bridge in Long market in the eazly.1970s,howev- Assemblyman Tom Hayden Beach Harbor and Cabrillo Beach m-,-manufacturers had dumped I {D-Santa Monica), chairman of a :pier in I.os Angeles Harbor. . more than Z500 metric tons of the i . ..state task force investigating con- ehemicalintolocalwaters,accord- I As health department warkere _ ins to officials . I mmination, supports Puffer. Hay posted warnings on fishing piece I on said he is especially disturbed from Malibu to Long Beach. au- =Scientists who study the effects - by the fact that no agency has clear thorities stressed that there is still of toxic chemicals say DDT-related - responsibility for determining much to be learned about the bay& problems abound. In 1970, bigh _ when precautions should be taken. "There's going to be a concerted - concentrations of DDT were . -"The lack of authority makes it effort to move ahead,"said Robert - blamed for -musing reproductive . I - possible to look the other way, to P. GhirellL director of the Los failures in brown Pelicans, Pero- - allow acrisis to fall through the Angeles Regional Water Quality gripe falcons and bald eagles,three cracks;he said. "The whole situa- Control Board. "We really need species of fish-eating birds. . lion is increrhble" V more and better information on :.';:),;ate, officials pulled San Pe. The legislator called for Has- whet's out CLere sow.What are the dio.arm mackerel off the market - comes resignation last week after because the fish contained twice - 'Brown accused Lim of distorting (contamination) levels and what =-theamount of DDT that is comod- _- scientific findings. In a five-page do those levels mean?" - i3edsafe for Lumen coneumptlon.. -letter m Hayden, Brown said Bas- As the contamination in com had purposely mislead "an quiry . More-receatiy, local shellfish have gains momentum, People who .bees banned bemuse of DDT con- umampectmg Public and- unsus- make their living from the sport taminatioa And last year. men• -_ Pcom!S Public officiate." fishing industry complain of a dra- : t16ts reported that marine mam. __: ^Ihere's Some Sisk' . matic decline in salem. along the Southern California -_- Bascom,_ whose research is pri- Ownersofbaitstoresandcharter .-cosatline had the world's highest _ ' warilyfundedby researc Califon- boat companies say- business .known levels of DDT. _piailyfune sanitation districts,ern Born dropped 25% m 50%!after reports.,, _ ��.;Moreover, authorities say the . about contamination surfaced.Jar_ - "ease&sment of the bays. He com- erttire So;!. California sh Morris,owner of bait an tackle iport i .Pared the danger from rating large fislicatch,which exceeds 20 million shops m Redondo Beach and Her. t. .:amounts h the most contaminated sines Beach. said his business was soine f ,annually, is effected by � _ fish- m the risk of dying in an immediately cut in half.Rim Cures- - sgine form of chemical cent warn- _ auliner crash. 'You should tell of the Twenty-Second-. Street inga, cw® with the recent warn - -people that there's some risk," Leading in San Pedro, a charter- mSs•.bowm°es• mare glowed _ Bascom has said. "What you boat company,reported that book. to catch and sell the most contemn -- shouldn't do is panic them about ings had plummeted from 150 a day. °aitedflob' _ the whole thing."to about 30aday. '�:�erlonn7Baea .T �� .Otheas have also voiced skepti- NewControversy :-==fn-one":12-month period, state , : .� about the existence of a gt8cials maid. fishermen sold more_. .`?sous health threat Lewis A. Some seafood retailers-say they " - SbhinazL a regional water board have also seen sale -_::then Crf,000 pounds of white croak-- drop.although.. scientist,called the Lays a"gem"at most of their catch comes from �er.Ya..Species that is discarded by! �a7emnt board hearing.Inaddition, unaffected areas. "We've bees. - many people but is Popular with'. several officials have admitted that hurt," said Vince Torre of 9&p' ._. 9aomigrants) that had been caught public pressure was the biggest nods Inc,in West Los '- =at White Point. wldelY vieweE as d.roBu Angeles the etate'e most contaminated oH- _ factor in rn recent decisionthe pi r post 0%.Non has been down about health warnings along the piers., 20%. None of our fist comes from ._siioteme site:Officials estimate that 10 the bays, but people are scored -times that Mount of white croaker: ._ about fish in generaL" •-. -may be eaten annually by recna. ".. With the effects of DDT dumping _ • a generating more and more concern, however, many critics are ques- tioning why authorities had to be pressured into acting on reports showing that Santa Monica and San Pedro bays are more polluted than ss EL SEGUNDO - Washington state's Commence- ment Bay,a well-known contan& nation site.At the very least, they _ say, officials were curiously [tore- sponsive to recommendations contained in a string of contamina- tion studies issued between 1970 and 1981. • ■ REDONDO "If we're posting warnings on BEACH , seafood gathering places now, it stands to reason that we,should have posted them 10 years ago," .. . LONG said Allan Charumd, an environ BEACH mental scientist with the regional water board,'because(eontamina- tion) levels were even higher then" EDR . - '$EDROe -Who's In Charge?' : • Brien Melzian,an environmental scientist with the San Francisco branch of the Environmental Pro- s tection Agency, agreed. "Some of this data has been around for years," McWan said. "Boma of it could or should have been looked at by the appropriate agencies in the to.NWanms past. I don't know why this has not . happened . . . The question we hear most often is, 'Who's in who was commissioned to study to the attention of the Los Angeles charge?'" fish:from Baja California to I.oa Regional Water Quality Control Locally, fisherman have been - Angelea County. recalled that the Board 1 wrote the board asking complaining about water quality toxic levels rose as he went north, for an immediate investigation," since 1949,when a group of anglers reaching their peak around White Fay said "But there was no re- formed the Ocean Fisb Protective Point MacGregor discovered that sponse.I couldn't get anything,not Assn. to investigate why their toxic contamination levels in fish even the satisfaction of someone catch was declining.Six years later, .around White Point exceeded the saying there might be a problem two scientists from the Scripps readings found anywhere else in here." Institute of Oceanography in IA thecoumtry. - - - Three years later,a young scien- Jolla also expressed concern, no. "The director at the time told me list with the Southern California ting that the White Point dlecharg to,write it up and put it in my Coastal Water Research Project es were hurling marine life . .. monthly report,"MacGregor said '.expremed the same frustration Dr. The Environmental Protection ""(Later), someone;.sent word to David Young, who had read Mac. Agency provided the first conclu- take everyone (who didn't work Gregor's study, received Environ- give evidence of the problem,in for the government) off the mail- mental Protection Agency funding 1970 by funding an ambitious sur- ing list. I don't think they wanted for follow-up work and concluded vey of DDT levels in flab taken topublicize it" _ that nearly half the fish taken from from the Atlantic, Pacific and Gulf The first public reference to Santa Monica and San Pedro bays coasts. MacGregor'e findings was in Sep- contained high levels of DDT and J.S. MacGregor of the federal - tember, 1970, when marine bioloo- PCBs,another toxic chemical. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, gist Rimmon Fay called the reporf "Tbere was a very concerted .r IIosAuaeiam�tmee effort on our part to get the data :.Sludge Management Program for out," recalled Young, now em- the Los Angeles/Orange County l played by the National Oceanic and Metropolitan Area and Puffer's Atmospheric Administration- in:. consumption study. �. .New York.I don't recall that there MacGregor's report,published in was much of a response The -the respected Fishery Bulletin, answer I got(from public officials) traced the 20-year history of DDT was that there was not a verylarge ;dumping in the bays and concluded percentage of the population ex- .ithatthere was heavy toxic contain-. posed to these things." ination in the ocean sediment,with Young's report was reviewed by most of the DDT concentrated in a... Don Baumgartner, director of the small area within a few rilles efthe". Pacific division of the Environ- Los Angeles County seweroutfalls mental Protection Agency."I think the reaction was that the Food and 'Potentially Significant' Drug Administration wasn't panic- In the 1980 sludge management ularly concerned because the fish study,scientists turned their atten- weren't used in interstate corn lion to the health risks caused by mercer" Baumgartner said. "If consuming contaminated fish,can- there was going to be a health eluding that there was "a paten. warning, it would have to mme ' tially significant public health con from the state" earn to sport fishermen from - - 'ProblematletoeFLh' consumption of (contaminants) in _ � seafood taken from the outfall Asked about the state's response areas." 1 . to Young's findings, Dr. James M. Moreover, scientists estimated Stubblebine, who was head of the 'that people consuming half a pound state Department of Health Servi of white croaker a day exposed ces at the time. said he had an themselves to 180 tines the nation- recollection of the report. Kizer, al average for DDT and that people the current director,said no one on who consumed slightly more than a his staff could recall'the 'study pound of any fish from the area - . either. Even if they had Kizer around White Point took in the questioned whetherit would have `same amount of DDT as; the aver- ..:raised say serious coaceraa. 4 age.citizen would consume in 30 "Closely in the '1970s, (tsadca) ,::years. were viewed as potentially prob The sludge report was closely lematic for fish,but not on the semen followed by Puffer's 1981 survey of :level for humans," Kizer said It—mortfishermen.Inhisstudy.fund- has only been in the last few.yeams r.ed by the. Environmental Protec- that people have. come to view' 41lm Agency,Puffer and his associ- them that way." - ;. a*t Ides eramined the eating habits of Young disagreed,. pointing out, "-more than 1,000 sport fishermen. that officials were aware of the ':Puffer found that white croaker, Food and Drug AdmiNstmtimes' the most contaminated species, standards for hazardous levels of: constituted nearly a third of the DDT.','I felt that there should be a catch He also discovered that health wanlig given ifthe FDA` "more fish were-consumed from level meant anything,^Young said." d: Z.a site likely to be affected"by "It wasn't unusual to get levels four tontaminatlon than from any other to five timee the FDA ihnitin those ' idles and that a large population of Xdoya = "%'' y ' <F poor people depended on their x Scientists produced-Eiubteroue y reatch as their maj raource of food. tatudies on the ba*]' the yeen •'. "We wanted to whethei. after Young's reporU(Some au (here was a population of people `I ; ihoritlea have speculated that the: really eating fish from-contamma- Santa Monica and San Pedro bays'T fed areas in any quantities,"Puffer . are the most studied::bodies of +}said. "We :verified that this was w. ' ater inthe country):-Among the 'true:. : .-Something that's always most prominent were a follow-up punted.me is why there wasn't study by MacGregor in 1976,a 19W ,, more attention paid-to our prob- •l public health report issued by the"' ;Jem Revised 6-13-8! COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY DDT AND PCB LIMITATIONS AND SAMPLING RESULTS Limitation of United States Limitation in Food and Drug District Ocean Administration Results of Discharge Permit in Edible Districts, (Effective 4-1-85) Fish Tissue Sampling DOT in Final Effluent 0.00007 ppml)2) 0.00001 ppm4) DOT in Fish Tissue, average 5.0 ppm 0.090 ppm5) range of results 0-1.0 ppm ..K:B in Final Effluent 0.0015 ppm2)3) 0.0018 ppm2)4) PCB in Fish Tissue, average 2.0 ppm . 0.17 ppm5) range of results 0.016-0.587 ppm 1) ppm = parts per million 2) 6 month median 3) Interim limit. Final limit becomes 0.00045 ppm effective December 15, 1985 4) 6 month median October 1984 through March 1985 5) Sampling results July 1, 1983 through June 30, 1984 RISK ASSESSMENT LIFETIME (70 YEAR) DEATHS PER 100,000 PEOPLE AT AVERAGE U. S. CONSUMPTION OR EXPOSURE RATES Attributed to Attributed to Cancer/Disease Accidents Smoking 8400 Motor vehicles 1400 Falls 420 Alcohol (cirrhosis) 350 Drowning 280 Fires 210 Natural background radiation (sea level ) 140 Diagnostic medical X-rays 140 Firearms 70 One saccharin diet drink/day 70 Flying 4 hours/week (cosmic radiation) 70 Sharing room with smoker 70 Four tablespoons peanut butter/day (aflatoxin) 56 Living in Colorado compared to New York (cosmic radiation) 56 Electrocution 35 Fish consumption, Santa Monica Bay as source, **9 oz./Week 32 Average saccharin consumption 14 One pint milk/day (aflatoxin) 14 One transcontinental flight/year (cosmic radiation) 7 Aviation accidents 7 Fish consumption, Orange County as source, **9 oz./Week 6.1 Tornados 4.2 Lightning 3.5 Hurricane 2.8 One-half pound charcoal broiled steak/week (benzopyrene) 2.1 Animal bite or insect sting 1.4 * Excerpted from "Risk Assessment Applied to Southern California Coastal Fish" by David Brown, Ph.D. , Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, May, 1985 ** Average rate for Southern California population of all marine sportfish consumed. RE; AGENDA ITEM #16 COUNTY SANITATION DISTR)c s of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA a.n sox E127 ,WNTMNVA .4 FOANN92729A121 July 1, 1985 10W au6 AVENUE f MN VALLEY.QWFU NN 92]68 Ml8 a1n9 910 a1At9W2A11 REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE July 1, 1985 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: - Present: Others Present: James Wahner, Chairman Richard B. Edgar, Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin Richard Beckendor£, Coast Insurance (Broker) Dan Griset Suzanne Atkins, General Counsel's Office Carol Eawanami Philip Maurer James Neal - Staff Present: Richard Olson J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager William H. Butler, Director of Finance Convene: 6:00 p.m. Adjourn: 7.00 p.m. 1. Excess Liability Insurance Policy Renewal. As the Board members are aware, the insurance market= la in a state of turmoil. Last April, the Districts' primary excess liability insurance- coverage (first $1,000,000)- was cancelled by the insurer. It was subsequently replaced with a new policy at a substantially higher premium and with lower coverage. Since then, the Districts' broker has been attempting to obtain quotes on our secondary level of coverage ($1,000,000 to $20,000,000 for 1984-85) which expired June 30th. Due to a lack of reinsurance capacity and insurers' general reluctance to provide liability insurance:to public agencies in California because of the state'a joint and several liability doctrine, the Districts' insurance broker has been experiencing difficulty in placing excess liability coverage. Therefore, at the June 12th meeting, the Joint Boards authorized and directed the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate quotes and direct the staff to place the additional- excess liability coverage prior to-,expiration of the existing coverage on June 30th, to be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification at the regularly scheduled meeting on July loth. The attached exhibit (Exhibit A - white - Item Cr Proposed Coverage) outlines the Districts' previous and existing coverage plus the proposed coverage options presented by the broker at the Committee meeting. The Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed the three available levels of coverage for excess liability presented by the broker and directed the staff to place $100000,000 of coverage effective July 1, 1985 for an annual premium of $70,133.00 (see Option 'v C.2.) . This level of coverage is consistent with the level of coverage carried by the Districts two years ago. ♦ - 1 Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page Two July 1, 1985 _ 2._ Directing the Staffand Insurance Broker to Investigate Feasibility of Increasing the Self-Insured- Retention Amount. Because of the difficulty in obtaining excess liability coverage and the rising premium costs coupled with reduced levels of coverage, the Fiscal Policy Committee directed the staff and the broker to evaluate the feasibility of increasing its self-insured retention levels from the existing $250,000 under the current primary public liability policy to $1,000,000 beginning with the next policy year in 1986-87. The purpose of the evaluation o£, thi's alternative is to- determine if the Districts' assumption of a higher self-insured retention level would result in reduced premiums for excess liability coverage in future years. . 3. Workers' Compensation Insurance Policy Renewal, In recent years the Districts have been able to. acquire excess workers' compensation coverage of $10,000,000 with a self-insured retention level of $100,000 for an annual premium of $8,200.00. The -Districts' broker informed the Fiscal Rolicy Committee at the meeting that options for renewal of this: coverage on July let, had also reflected higher premiums due to higher payroll costs. as well as the higher costs of reinsurance and reduced coverage. The broker presented two basic options for coverage, both featuring either $125,000 or $150,000 self-insured retention levels. The coverage levels and associated premiums are presented on the attached exhibit (Exhibit B - yellow - Item B, Propollw� Coverage) . Mr. Beckendor£ recommended that the Districts select either option 2a or 2b, the statutory workers' compensation coverage, which provides for unlimited benefits. Although the premiums are slightly higher, this type of coverage is preferable to the $10,000,000 coverage in the event the Districts suffer a major incident affecting a group of employees. - The Fiscal Policy Committee directed the staff and broker to place statutory workers' compensation coverage (Option 2b - unlimited benefits) effective July 11 1985, for an annual premium of $13,556.00. I➢�4 NBL1C LTPBIfl1Y Bt#11/" M"a n 5/10/5s Rvlsed yn/es WBl4A ]IHliRP1+([RglfB V9. pFEP'HD(P�PVIBPBIB P�eolau4/OdaUrty Ptapnaed bald le Self- 19Be�5 PtcFaaed/F dim m lWe of mesa IWeiel�m hm�nt of CtrRR® Ina¢ed lktaitlm Prentun 19B'r06 Prenlm BaietSa Liability P. April 19, Ms 5 9W.M $1W,000 - $n,90D Gb rlll rot mlglnd.a tmtlm (1950-ffil raa+, dale July 1, 1985/ O.W"cmllm eEEectlee ARIL 14 1985 July 1, 1955 $M,"," $1,=,0W $L8,300 -Otlgli.uy-ti-t Hdnti j policy a mlgl l b ba $SS,OOD40,WB tegdree renm l $ 9W,OW 195E-05 RlR wJ v 1, Ms 9btd . 40 5W B. fJU.9@G AIU 14, 1956 $ 975.5W $M,= a pin $75,000 Apiwed by J Lnt plea $15.OW fa . �&m ARIL.10, eery clsl 1955 C. e� 1. Optlm 1 July 1, 1906 s S,OW,000 $1.W0,000 W,113 Owerege aid Kodw levels be adeeted ]. Opt1m ] July 1, 1956 $10.5W,5W $1,OW,OW MID ky Pln®l Policy . mmlth Rlor b 1. cpd. 3 July 1. 1956 $15lm" $I,WO,OW M,M3 Jun 30, 1905 ( ( WOMBS, COMPENSATION EXCESS (STOP-LOSS) INSUM EXHIBIT B 6/27/85 EXISTING iNSOAANCE COVERAGE VS. PROPOSED COVEMCE AVAILABLE exlatlNg/Propoeed Deductible Self- P...1. Type of Coverage Renewal Bete Amount of Coverage Insured Retention Level I. Exeeee Workers' Compensation A. EXISTING July 1, 1985 $10,000,000 B...fit. $100,000 $ 8,200 (1986-65) B. PROPOSED 1. - Option 1. July 1, 1986 $10,000,000 Benefits $125.000 $15,812 - Option 1b July 1, 1986 010,000,000 Benefits 5150,00E $12,514 2. - Option 2e July 1, 1986 Statutory Workers' $125,000 $16,962 Compensation )unlimited benefits) - Option 2b July 1, 1986 Statutory Workers' $150,000 $13,556 Compensation (unlimited benefits) E � RE: rAGENDA ITEM #19W COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA - G O 90M 8129 June 26, 1985 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CALIFOFNIA 92729.8127 106"ELLIS AVENUE F WNTAIN VALLEY,CAUFORNIA 927084018 (7141540.2910 0141962 2411 STAFF SUMMARY RETORT ON FINAL FNVIRDUMENTAL EAPACT REPORT FOR JOINT TREATMENT WORKS WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN At the regular meeting on April 10, 1985, the Boards of Directors con- ducted a public hearing on the Draft EIR for the Joint Treatment Wbrks Wastewater Master Plan. A representative of the Districts' consultant, K. P. Lindstrom and Associates, reviewed the Draft EIR which had been pre- viously mailed to the Directors. Following the close of the hearing, the Beards directed staff and the consultant to prepare the Final EIR after the close of comment period on May 1, 1985. The EIR identifies and addresses unavoidable impacts ( those impacts which continue to be of significance even when all feasibly known and identified mitigation measures are applied) that are temporary and short term. In addition the EIR also identifies impacts which can be mitigated. 'These various impacts and mitigation measures were identified in the Draft Environmental Impact Report. Since the hearing, the Districts have received the following comments on the Draft F,IR which are summarized below along with the Environmental Consultant's responses. 1. State of California - Office of Planning and Research The Office of Planning and Research advised that the State Clearinghouse had submitted the Environmental Document to selected state agencies for review and had received no comments. 'ihe letter acknowledged that the Districts have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for Draft EIR's pursuant to CEQA. 2. City of Fountain Valley A. The City of Fountain Valley made 25 comments on the Draft SIR. These included general comments concerning the fact that the FIR evaluated, in a general manner, the impacts associated with providing treatment faci- lities necessary to serve regional needs for a 20-year period while analzying specific projects to meet needs on a five-year basis. The com- ment requested that the precise approval covered by this EIR be clarified. The second general area of concern was that the Draft EIR did not fully address the mitigation measures and impacts of dust, biotic resources, transportation, noise, nuisance factors, geology, air quality, visual/scenic qualities and resources. -✓ The Final EIR states that this document addresses the impacts of implementing a phased program for construction of treatment plant projects 1 to insure adequate facilities to handle projected wastewater flows and �.► meet various regulatory requirements. The regulatory requirements include limitations for effluent quality, compliance with air quality regulations, general community and District environmental quality objectives to reduce odors, visual appearance objectives and maximizing the efficiency of operations in terms of energy consumption, chemical use and labor. The Final EIR delineates the relationship between the five-year project planning horizon and specific projects at the 20-year planning period covered in the Master Plan. It includes a table which specifically deli- neates the five-year incremental facilities and the 20-year incremental facilities. E. Oaments 4 and 5 from the City of Fountain Valley related to the environmental setting. They indicated first that the numbers in Table II-9 within the original document did not correspond to total acreage shown and requested clarification of developed lauds versus undeveloped lands. Secondly the City discussed field observations regarding traffic congestion and requested to know how the information was derived. Table II-9 has been revised to accurately reflect recent changes related to District No. 13 and to show that developable lands are a sub- category of presently undeveloped lauds. A revised Table II-9 is included in the final document. Regarding traffic congestion, the consultant has stated that the field observations were made by himself as well as through discussions with Districts' staff. No detailed traffic studies have been done as part of this EIR. C. The next five issues raised by the City concerned the description of proposed facilities. The first requested a clarification of Table III-1 concerning the relationship of the facilities shown to the 5- and 20-year facility needs. the second discussed the new 100 M2D headworks and the fact that Phase I was identified as having a 50 MGD capacity and asked for capacity clarifications on that item. The third issue under this section referred to flows from SAWPA and questioned whether the faci- lities addressed in the EIR are adequate for the ultimate 30 M,'D capacity owned by SAWPA. The next item discussed a new electrical sub-station being located at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and stated that the environmental impacts of such a sub-station do not appear to be addressed in the docu- ment and asks what approval process a sub-station would undergo. Lastly under this section the city asks whether or not the proposed facilities addressed in the EIR are adequate for the 20-year projected needs for pri- mary treatment and acknowledged that a separate EIR will be prepared for solids disposal. The Environmental Consultant refers the City to Table I contained within the Final EIR for an explanation and clarification of the proposed facilities. The Final. EIR states that the proposed new headworks will be constructed for eventual capacity of 100 FGD, but the first capacity incre- ment will be 50 MD or up to as much as 80 M2D. It goes on to say that actual sizing will depend upon the size of pumps which are most cost effective and the incremental size of engines or motors which are selected which are issues to be decided during final design. with respect to flows 2 from SAWPA, the EdR addresses the addition of 24 MD of new primary treat- ment capacity over the next five years which includes additional capacity of up to 7 bGD for increased flows from SAWPA, bringing SAWPA's total contract flow capacity to 15 MGD of the ultimate 30 M,'D for which they have rights. With regard to the new electrical sub-station, this facility was included in the five-year planning period but actually was scheduled for possible construction beyond the five-year period. However, it is now anticipated that the new odor scrubbing facilities may create power demands which will warrant making this modification sooner than expected, and it nay also be made by construction of a more centralized switching station as a part of the centralized power generating facilities. The impacts mould be minimal. The last item under "Description of Proposed Facilities" clarifies that the proposal is for the construction of 24 M,'D primary treatment to serve present (SDDC service area needs for the next five years and that no secondary treatment is proposed. D. The last 15 o mients from the City of Fountain Valley have to do with the assessment of impacts and mitigation measures. These include dust, biotic resources, transportation, noise, nuisance factors, geology, soils, seismicity, air quality and micro-climate impacts, visual and scenic qualities, public services and resources impacts. The responses are broken out as follows: (1) Dust impacts will be mitigated through watering of the area ... and the Districts have committed to extraordinary dust controls if special problems or complaints arise. (2) Biotic resources will be handled through the hiring of a landscape architect to prepare an overall landscape plan for the treatment facilities. Priority attention will be given both to the southerly and westerly perimeters of Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach and areas of the plant adjoining the Santa Ana River. (3) The City's comments address the proposed signalized entry gate at Plant No. 1 to allow direct freeway off-ramp access. The Districts' are currently working with CalTrans and the City of Fountain Valley to determine the feasiblity of such an entrance change being made. This would provide a safer entrance for Districts' employees and visitors as well as mitigating transporta- tion impacts associated with the construction of the new facili- ties. In the event this entry cannot be implemented, the alternate plan would be to improve the Garfield Avenue entrance to the plant to accommodate heavier trucks bringing materials to the job site during the construction. As a mitigation measure, the Districts will have a traffic management plan prepared addressing construction-related traffic routings and scheduled construction activities. Implementation of the signalized entry gate would begin as soon as necessary permits were obtained. (4) Concerning noise impacts, the Final EIR commits the Districts to compliance with all applicable noise ordinances, restricted 3 hours of construction and a specific noise control plan to be prepared and reviewed with local jurisdictions should pile driving be required. Districts will review possible construc- tion methods to avoid pile driving. (5) Nuisance factors involved with the construction refers to odor control during construction and tie-ins. The Districts have committed in the Final EIR to making operational changes as necessary including the assignment of extra staff to accelerate or intesify work activities to help reduce odors. (6) With respect to geology, soils and seismicity, the Districts have conmi.tted in the Final EIR to preparation of a pre-design geotechnical report to address all geologic, seismic and soils issues. (7) Three of the City's comrents referred to air quality impacts. The Districts are working closely with the Air Quality Management District in order to achieve compliance with all applicable rules and regulations. Reference was made to a mussing table. Estimated air pollutant emissions from existing operations was inadvertently left out of the Draft EIR when reproduced. It is included within the Final EIR. Of the 11 air pollution mitigation measures recommended for implementation or evaluatation, eight are presently being implemented by the Districts. The latter three are not presently planned for implementation. (8) The City's concern about visual hipacts from the new facilities will be made an integral part of the design and construction of the various projects. (9) The City expressed a concern regarding the adequacy of the fire fighting facilities. The Final EIR states that there will be adequate personnel with proper training available to handle any anticipated needs. (10) Two of the City's questions refer to transportation issues. The Final EIR states that a 10 percent increase in District-related traffic could occur but will not create any capacity problems at intersections in the vicinity and that the construction of a new entry gate should greatly alleviate the potential hazards posed by having to make a left turn into Treatcent Plant No. 1 from Ellis Avenue. The EIR further commits to review the Ultimate Solids Study Enviromental Documents with the City of Fountain Valley during their preparation. (11) A related City comment concerns traffic noise. The impacts of traffic noise will be addressed in a traffic management plan prepared by the Districts. (12) Lastly the City's comments reference handling and storage prac- tices for chemicals used at the plant and questions whether 4 there will be increased hazards to nearby residences. The Final EIR states there will be no increased hazard and that in fact the risks are likely to be reduced due to a reduced use of chlorine. Additionally the Districts have an on-going training program in the handling of chemicals. 3. City of Huntington Heads A. The City of Huntington Beads had three comments on the Draft EIR. They asked to know the individual on staff wto would function as a liason between the community and the City Hall regarding complaints due to noise and odors during construction. They also conned that the 84-foot surge tower will have a measurable visual impact, and lastly they stated that proper landscaping could reduce the impacts of the surge tower as well as the overall treatment plant. B. The Final EIR states that an administrative assistant assigned to the General Manager's office will be the liason with the City. The Districts will utilize the services of an experienced architect to deter- mine the various design alternatives for the surge tower. lastly an architect will be included as a member of the design team to minimize the potential for all visual impacts through structual design features, landscaping, fencing and other appropriate means. The final designs of all structures affecting visual appearance will be reviewed with the staffs of the neighboring cities. 4. County of Orange The Districts received comments from three divisions of the County of Orange. The Transportation/Planning Division, the Public Fbrks Design Division, and the General Services Agency. Their comments concerned cir- culation patterns from the growth inducing impacts of the treatment plant expansion including the completion of the Santa Ana River Bridge crossings such as Garfield, Gisler, Banning and 19th Street and air quality impacts and how construction would affect the Santa Ana River Bike Trail. Other com- ments include the expansion of the inter-plant system and an increase in quantity and/or change in quality of sewage/sludge produced at the Districts going to Coyote Canyon Landfill. The Final EIR rotes the comnent concerning regional improvements in transporation including the Santa Ana River Bridge crossings. No impact on the proposed master plan projects is anticipated from these impro- vements. The correction in sulfur dioxide standard on Table II-3 was made. Construction-related air emissions are difficult to estimate at the present time due to the schedule of construction of the various facili- ties. However, the air pollutant emissions estimate are based on preli- minary work done by John Carollo Engineers and the Draft Digester Gas Utilization Study addressed in Appendix G of the Draft EIR. A copy of Table II-20 is included in the Final EIR. The Final EIR does state that there are potential dust, noise and visual impacts during construction on the Santa Ana River Bike Trail, however, work will take place on week days when the trail is under less intensive use. No obstructions will prevent 5 use of the trail or impact it in any other way. The concern expressed by Public Works over the inter-plant line system is the subject of the future engineering report and EIR which will provide for the cooperative efforts and needs of both the County and the Districts if the timing and coor- dination in planning can be carried out to meet mutual objectives. Lastly concerning the County's comment on sewage/sludge; the Districts are pro- ceeding with plans to find an alternative means of sludge disposal. The Districts have entered into a long-term agreement with a private firm to take all of the dewatered, digested sludge for use in a composting and soil amendment production facility. The memorandum of understanding bet- ween the County of Orange and the City of Irvine precludes the acceptance of sewage/ sludge at the Canyon until a decision is made to accept sludge based on complete environmental review including public hearings. The additional sludge, over and above the 25 trucks per day which can be accommodated at Coyote Canyon, will be handled through other approved means. There is no indication that sludge quality will change or that significant increases in sludge quantity will occur. 5. Orange County Water District The Water District indicated a concern about any facility which may affect the quality of the secondary treated wastewater at Plant No. 1. The Final EIR states that no changes in the quality of secondary effluent provided to the Orange County Water District are anticipated. 6. South Coast Air Quality Management District The Air Quality Management District raised 11 issues concerning the Draft EIR and requested that the following areas be addressed in the Final EIR. A. Detailed description of digester gas fired resource recovery faci- lities. B. The uncontrolled and controlled emissions for each piece of equip- ment in each plant including existing and proposed equipment and the basis for emission calculations. C. A detailed description of BACr to be implemented. D. Explanation of how the proposed equipment will comply with appli- cable rules of the SCAW. E. Power plant emissions associated with the electrical power ueeage at the plants after modification. F. Modeling of project emissions to determine maximum ground level concentrations and receptor areas. G. A map to show isopleth of the annual average of concentrations based on an emission of one gram per second. 6 H. Maps to show isopleths of maximum ground level concentrations for each of the modeled interceptor areas. I. Maps showing the surrounding area within five miles and iden- tifying sensitive receptors such as schools, hospitals, convalescent homes and agricultural areas. J. Odor control mitigations during tie-ins of newly constructed faci- lities, digester cleaning and upset conditions. R. Assessment of risk involved with hazardous materials if a major spill occurs. The Final EIR responses are as follows: As yet the detailed description of digester gas fired resource reco- very facilities does not exist, however, it is known that they will be more efficient and produce fewer air pollutant emissions for most paranm- ters than existing facilities employed by the Districts. On-doing discussions with the SCAQMD will continue during preliminary design, final design and application for authority to construct and authority to operate permits to assure that applicable regulations are met. The Final EIR includes an implementation schedule for the Digester Gas Utilization Study project elements. The estimates of controlled and uncontrolled emissions for each piece of equipment is based on limited on-site emission testing and professional judgment along with the performance testing of equipment in use elsewhere. The Districts' consulting engineers have estimated existing and proposed emissions for various pollutants along with their assumptions. Detailed emissions data for each piece of equipment are being developed in cooperation with SCAQMD. Detailed descriptions of BACP are at present beyond the scope of planning done to date, however, several technologies are being tested by the Districts or being applied to existing equipment. It is the Districts' intention to comply with all rules of AQW using the appropriate methods. Details on specific engines and control technologies have mt yet been developed to the stage where specific types of equipment have been selected. Therefore, explaining how the proposed equipment will comply with applicable rules is not possible at this time. In the near future it is expected that the Districts and SCAQMD will evaluate the need for a new source review. Because of the preliminary nature of some of the project elements, quantification of all emissions was not possible. However, the Districts' staff and their con- sulting engineers are meeting on a regular basis with the staff of SCAW to discuss current operations, plan changes and new projects. During these meetings, compliance with existing and proposed regulations are being discussed along with permitting requirements. It is understood that air quality impact modeling and other specific studies will be necessary in order to obtain needed permits once project design is completed. lower plant emissions associated with reduced electrical power usage purchased from Southern California Edison, assuming a centralized generation system is implemented, is included in the Final EIR. lastly, risks associated with the use of potentially hazardous materials have been minimal at the Districts' facilities in the past. However, in addition the Districts' 7 have built-in safety devices and are constantly training both District and local Fire Department Emergency Response personnel in routing and emergency procedures related to chlorine and other chemicals used for treatment operations. Covering of the primary clarifiers at the treatment plants with the scrubbing of off-gases will dramatically reduce chlorine demands offsetting the increased demands associated with treating more wastewater and sludge in the future. The comments and responses are more fully detailed in the enclosed Final EIR and Resolution No. 85-119. Consideration of approval of the Final EIR will take place at the Boards regular meeting of July 10, 1985. 8 RE: AGENDA ITEM #19(G) RESOLUTION 4O. 85-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECIORS OF COUNTY SANTITATIDN DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 CERTIFYING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL D4PACT REPORT FOR JOINT TREATMENT FORKS WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND ADOPTING A STAT'FWE-11T OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIDNS. xxxxxxzxxxxxxxzzzzzx WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, are presently con- sidering the approval of the 1983 Master Plan for Joint Works wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities, as amended, (the Project), and WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 (hereinafter "DISTRICTS") are the lead agency for the preparation and con- sideration of environmental documents for projects contained within said Master Plan, as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, (hereinafter "CEQA") and the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act as modified and adopted by the DISTRICTS (hereinafter "CEQA Guidelines"); and WHEREAS, in order to facilitate an objective assessment of the individual and collective environmental impacts associated with the improvements to the to treatment plants, the DISTRICTS have caused to be prepared, a Draft Environmental Impact Report "Joint Treatment Wbrks Wastewater Master Plan" to address the significant environmental impacts, mitigation measures and project alternatives associated with the Project; and 1 . G , WHEREAS, the DISTRICTS have consulted with other public agencies, and the general public and gives: then an opportunity to comment on said Draft EIR as required by the provisions of CHQA and the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, on April 10, 1984, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Boards of Directors of the DISTRICTS to provide a further opportunity for the general public to c:mreent on and respond to the Draft EIR at which tine no person other than the DISTRICTS' consultant spoke; and WHEREAS, the DISTRICTS have evaluated the oamients received from public agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft EIR; and WHEREAS, said comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR, either verbatim or in sumnry and the responses of the DISTRICTS to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process have been included in and made part of said Draft EIR to form the Final EIR for said Project as required by Section 15132 of the CE42A Guidelines; and WHEREAS, said Final EIR has been presented to the members of the Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS for review and consideration prior to the final approval of, and oommiitnent to, any Master Plan projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RENLVED by the Boards of Directors of county Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of orange County, California as follows: 1. That the Boards of Directors of said DISTRICTS do hereby testify that the Final Environmental Fact Report, "Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master 2 Plan" has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CF,4° Guidelines and that the DISTRICTS have reviewed and considered the information contained in said Final EIR prior to approval of, or commitment to, the Project. Said Final EIR is composed of the following elements: A. Draft Environmental Impact Report "Joint Treatment works Wastewater Master Plan" and all appendices thereto; B. Cements and responses to comments on said Draft EIR; 2. That the Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS do hereby find that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project which will mitigate or avoid any significant adverse effects identified in the Final ErR as specifically itemized in Attachment A to this Resolution. �.✓ 3. The Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS further find that although changes, alterations or conditions have been incorporated into the projects contemplated in the Master Plan which will substantially mitigate or avoid significant effects identified in the Final EIR, certain of the significant effects cannot be mitigated to fully acceptable levels. The remaining impacts identified below may continue to be of significant adverse impact even when all feasibly known and identified mitigation measures are applied. A. Continued population growth in Orange County will increase air pollution emissions associated with transportation, fuel combustion, and industrial production. Findings: The DISTRICTS provide facilities to accommodate urban growth planned and approved by cities and the Oounty and do not 3 independently regulate or control planning and development. Emissions control measures include vapor recovery and reduction in volatility: motor vehicle inspection and maintenance programs; extended warranty on new cars; additional emission controls on motor vehicles; and home utility engine replacement. The Boards of Directors find it infeasible to further mitigate the impacts asso- ciated with urban growth. The projects outlined in the E1R are necessary to accommodate the wastewater flows generated by City and County approved development plans following required environmental reviews. If the projects are not implemented, development could be curtailed or reliability of the wastewater system could be reduced. B. Continued development will reduce agricultural land, open space and wildlife habitat. Fish and other riparian fauna will be affected by water resources development projects. scenic views will be reduced. Findings: The DISTRICPS are a single purpose agency with the sole function to provide regional collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater. The DISTRIMS only provide facilities to accommodate the development approved by ]oral governing agencies, and do not inde- pendently regulate or control planning and development. The DISTRICDi will promote the preservation of wildlife habitat, open space and agricultural land to the extent possible and will encourage reten- tion of open space for its scenic value. C. Increased raise during construction. 4 r Findings: All construction activities will comply with the noise limitations set by the individual cities or the County of Orange. Proper use and maintenance of noise reduction devices on heavy equipment will help to mitigate the problem and construction activities will be limited to daylight tours in noise sensitive areas. D. Short term visual impacts from machinery will occur during construc- tion. Findings: Efforts will be made to minimize the aesthetic impacts during construction. Mitigations include reestablishment of landscaped areas after construction. The Hoards of Directors find the above mitigation measure will substantially reduce the impact and that further measures are not economically feasible for a short term impact. E. The outfall surge tower at Plant No. 2 will be raised to a height of 85 feet and will be highly visible. The new outfall booster sta- tion will be visible from State Highway Route 1 and Costa Mesa bluffs. Findings: The proposed project will be constructed on an already impacted site. The surge Weser appearance will be improved by the use of texturing or paint. Further, an architect with experience in reducing visual impacts from tall structures will be part of the design team. A landscape plan will be developed and implemented. F. During construction, worker traffic will number 60-80 vehicles per day at Plant No. 1. At certain stages of construction, temporary 5 local impacts will be significant. Construction of the headworks will require transport of a significant anount of concrete involving large numbers of trucks. 'There will be approximately a ten percent increase in truck and automobile traffic over existing operations. Findings: A traffic management plan will be developed in ocopera- tion with the selected contractors, the DISTRICTS, CalTrans, and the Cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. Plant No. 1 has almost direct access to the San Diego Freeway which should minimize local impacts. Relocation of the existing new service entrance and access road has been proposed to provide direct signalized access to and from Plant No. 1. The Directors find it infeasible to further mitigate the impacts associated with additional traffic. G. Secondary energy embodied in concrete, steel, equipment and labor constitute the largest commitments of energy during construction. Implementation of the odor mitigation project will reduce the amount of chlorine used by the Districts; however, use of hydrogen peroxide, sodium hydroxide, polymers and ferrous and ferric chloride will increase. Findings: Maximum use of material through good design and one-time construction of major structures to be fitted with equipment when needed and proper handling and storage techniques to minimize risk of hazards associated with use of chemicals. 4. Certain changes or alterations (e.g., mitigation measures) are required in or incorporated into the Project through the permitting responsibility and 6 jurisdiction of a public agency other than Oounty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, ♦./ 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13. These changes will be included in permits obtained from the applicable agency by DISTRICTS or its contractor as itemized below: A. Applicable rules of the Air Quality Management Plan to the Projects when implemented provide partial mitigation for short term air quality impacts. The South Coast Air Quality Management District is responsible for insuring conpliance with and implementation of these rules. DISTRICTS' staff is working closely with that agency. B. A California Coastal Permit will be required for any construction at Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beads. The City of Huntington Beach is responsible for issuance of the permit and insuring imple- mentation of certain projects in accordance with the rules of the Local Coastal Plan. C. Approval from CalTrans and the City of Fountain valley will be required for entrance modifications at Plant tio. 1. Ca1Trans is responsible for insuring compliance with such requirements. D. A dewatering permit will be required for discharge of groundwater encountered during construction. The Regional Water Quality Control Board is responsible for insuring compliance with dewatering permit requirements. 5. The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 have hglanced the benefits of the proposed Project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve said Project. �.d 7 The Boards do hereby further find, determine and state, pursuant to the provi- sions of Section 15093 of the State Guidelines, that the occurrence of those certain significant envirornmntal effects identified in the Final EIR and set forth in paragraph 3 above have been found acceptable and will be permitted without further mitigation due to the following overriding considerations: A. The projects are necessary to accommdate wastewater flows from ongoing development approved by the local planning zoning authori- ties after required environmental reviews. The DISIRICM are a single purpose agency with the responsibility to collect, treat and dispose of wastewater generated within the DIS'IRICr5' service area. Construction of the Project identified in the EIR is necessary to provide sewerage facilities to serve development approved by the Cities and County after separate environmental review by the approving entity as identified in local land use plans. B. The Boards of Directors find that implementation of the project alternatives identified in the Final EIR are infeasible as follows: (1) Anaheim Fbrebav Reclamation Project. This project would include the construction of a wastewater reclama- tion facility to treat wastewater from Sanitation District No. 2 near the basin recharge area in the City of Anaheim. Eventually this facility could be enlarged to treat up to 50 M;D. 'The primary reason the project has not been inplanented is the very high costs associated with it and the lack of firm regulatory guidance on water quality levels needed for groundwater recharge. 8 (2) Seal Beads Water Reclamation Plant. �..' This project includes the construction of a reclamation plant that would treat up to 5.6 dGD of flow for augmenting the Ins Alamitos groundwater barrier project near the San Diego River. This project has limited capacity reduction and has not yet been identified as economically feasible. (3) Wastewater Reclamation from the Fountain Valley Plant. The ElR discussed several projects which could result in greater use of wastewater from the Fountain Valley plant. Included within the study is the current Water Factory 21 project; however, construction of additional reclamation projects at the Fountain Valley Plant would not alleviate the need for treatment facilities. v (4) Specific Proiect Alternatives Affecting the Sizing and Sitting of Related Facilities. During the development of the Master Plan a number of alternatives were evaluated regarding certain project objectives. 'These included varying the size and location of major facilities. Alternatives which were discussed included the following. a. No project alternative. This is the do-nothing alternative which would result in an increase in flow without building any facilities for treating, or handling or disposing of sane. b. No headworks construction. This alternative would result in eliminating the construction of the pumping facilities which 9 lift the wastewater from the low incoming trunk sewers to the plant for treatment and disposal. Elimination of the headworks will result in more frequent filling of the sewers with resulting flooding of raw sewage. c. Constructing no new primary clarifiers. This would result in increasing the rate at which the sewage is processed through the plants. If the rates are increased, the level of treatment is proportionately reduced. d. Constructing no new digesters. The digesters are used to pro- vide treatment and sludge storage capacity as well as to reduce the volume of solids. This would result in an increase in the amount of sludge to be disposed of in landfills and certain other problems associated with disposal of raw sludge. e. Not undertaking operational improvements. This would result in degradation of the effluent quality as well as degradation of air pollution standards. f. Not undertaking environmental mitigation projects. This would increase the objectional odors on the residents near the two treatment plant sites if the odor mitigation measures are not incorporated. If the co-generation facility proposed is not constructed, the DISMicts will be unable to use the digester gas as a fuel source and be in compliance with air pollution control requirements. Electrical energy use would increase and digester gas would be flared. 10 g. Not constructing outfall booster station or extending the surge V tower. Without the additional putrging rapacity, the DIS9RIC15 will not be able to discharge the treated effluent at certain tidal and peak conditions. Overflows of effluent into the Santa Ana River could occur. This could contaminate the river as well as nearby beaches. h. Other alternatives. other possible alternatives which were con- sidered include the following. (1) Construction of raw sewage storage basins at Plant No. 1 to equalize flows was rejected because pining is still required and odor control becones a problem. (2) Construction of effluent storage facilities at Plant No. 2, rejected for the same reasons as at Plant No. 1. (3) Initiation of a moratorium on new construction was rejected because it does not solve current needs and further, the DISTRICTS do not independently exercise land use control and regulation, that function being reserved to the County and cities. (4) Instituting a massive mandatory retroactive low flow toilet program was not considered practical because it would take years to complete, no existing legal authority appears to exist, and there would be no reduction in solids or sulfide generation or odors. 11 C. Fbr the reasons set forth above it is not eoonomicaUy feasible to further mitigate or avoid the environmental effects hereinabove identified. PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A RWJW MEEPIM HEJA JUU 10, 1985 12 Attachment A SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES" Area of Concern Impact Status Impacts - Mitigation Measures Geology/Soils/ Selsmic ty PRIMARY: Construction . Mitigable The existing soil profile at Plant Soil and geological studies will be 11 would be destroyed to a depth of up conducted to evaluate foundation resistance to 15 feet .to construct the facilities. During construction, soil subject to wind Foundations and structures would be blowing will be watered to minimize dust built to withstand a maximum expected earthquake Mitigable The Plant 12 site will be excavated to Soil and geological studies will be a depth of up to 15 feet to construct conducted to evaluate foundation resistance the proposed facilities. The excavation During construction, soil subject to wind will alter the existing remaining soil blowing will be watered to minimize dust profile to a depth already modified by sludge drying operations PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) Mitigated A major earthquake along the Newport- Rubber gasketed mechanical joints will be Inglewood Fault Zone could damage used to connect pipes to treatment faci- proposed facilities resulting in the litles to minimize ruptures during release of untreated sewage into the earthquakes. All facilities are and will streets. The hazard is greatest at be designed to earthquake standards. Plant 12 with liquefaction a potential concern at Plant 11 Water Resources PRIMARY: Construction (Both Plants) Mitigable Construction may require site dewatering Demanding of water and water disposal for deep foundations or excavation work in accordance with EPA and RWQCB NPDES Permit guidelines " For a description of definitions and terms used in this summary, see the end of this Attachment Area of Concern Impact Status Impacts Mitigation Measures Water Resources PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) Positive Impact An increase in the ability to handle No mitigation measures are required existing peak and hydraulic flows will result from the project, thereby resulting in a beneficial impact of preventing overflows of raw waste- water. No adverse impacts on water quality are expected SECONDARY Mitigable Future water demands are anticipated to Provide additional imported water supplies. exceed the developable supply resulting Continue to implement wastewater conserva- in higher water costs tion and reclamation projects. Air Quali�_ and Mrc—roclimate PRIMARY: Construction Mitigable Dust emissions at Plant 11 are estimated During construction, watering should occur to be as high as 110 lb/day per acre over on a daily basis as needed for dust a 21 month period for a two acre maximum suppression. Use of well tuned and properly area. Dust should not pose a nuisance maintained equipment can reduce gaseous . to residential areas of Costa Mesa and pollutant emissions. Discontinuing con- Foundation Valley if mitigation measures struction during second stage smog alerts are implemented will also reduce air pollution problems on poor air quality days PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) Plants 11 and 12 Positive Impact A net benefit in terms of existing air Implementation of cogeneration facilities quality should occur. Odors, largely will reduce air pollutant emissions. .i in the form of hydrogen sulfide, are Retrofitting of existing internal combust- estimated to be reduced from over 280 ion engines with approved air pollution pounds per day to less than 3 pounds control equipment (i.e. , selective per day through construction of vers dilution) for meeting required red tions and scrubbers on existing facia ra S. for NOx and CO. Addition of ferrz Area of Concern Fact Status Impacts Mitigation Measures An increase in prechlorination capacity chloride to digesters will reduce Sox and digester gas clean-up projects will emissions further reduce odors and SO and NO emissions. x x Air Qualit and Al croc mate Positive Impact Estimated emissions from engines See previous page installed in the new booster station and headworks are expected to be lower than the emissions from the existing engines which will be abandoned. No SO and hydrocarbons will decrease aid Co may increase or decrease depending on the engine ultimately selected for co-generation facilities. Biotic Resources PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) Plants 11 and 12 Positive Impact/ Seagulls and crows which feed on food 1. Means of providing improved wildlife Mitigable floating in primary clarifiers will be habitat should be evaluated displaced once covers are placed on clarifiers. This will reduce potential 2. Industrial and non-industrial source transmission of pathogens. Existing control programs should continue to be trees and landscaping which will be enforced. removed will reduce potential wildlife habitat for some birds. Marine dis- 3. Continue to maintain effluent quality posal of effluent is not expected to to meet NPDES Permit limitations and adversely affect biota conduct $1.5 million annual marine monitoring program 4. Research on improved wastewater disposal practices should continue i Area of Concern impact Status Impacts Mitigation Measures Cultural and SECONDARY Solent f c Resou rose i Mitigable Continued urbanization threatens to *'Continue inventory and mapping programs destroy significant historic and cultural to Identify cultural resources; support landmarks historic preservation efforts. Support archeological, paleontological and scientific research for important sites in Orange County Public Service and Ut t es PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) Plants }1 and 12 Mitigable Energy use will increase substantially Implement the most cost effective treatment unless cogeneration projects are facilities which use the least amount of constructed. energy, such as: 1. Maximizing use of digester gas 2. Optimizing sludge dewatering operations to minimize polymer and potable water use 3. Implementing cogeneration projects SECONDARY Mitigable Urban growth will place greater demands **Improve public transportation; encourage _.� on existing transportation systems and carpooling; reuse and recovery waste create a need for additional waste material, etc, disposal facilities, schools, police, ,I fire protection and other governmental services Transportation SECONDARY Mitigable Continued overcrowding of Orange Convert local streets into high-flow County's freeway system will occur arterials; encourage vanpools, staggered unless the region-s transit sysr under- work hours, modified work weeks, rking goes some changes r disincentives, promote to Iecommunr pions, Area of Concern Impact Status Impacts Mitigation Measures Transportation and other manes of reducing dependency on automobiles for transportation or Mitigable increasing efficiency of existing faci- lities. Noise PRIMARY: Construction Mitigable Noise levels associated with construct- Construction activities should not commence ion at Plant it are expected to range before 7: 30 a.m. nor extend past the hour from 75 dB(A) to 105 dB(A) within 50 of 5: 30 p.m. or the hours stipulated by feet of the equipment being used. Pile local ordinances. Low noise level equip- driving operations (if employed) will ment and noise barriers should be used. generate the greatest source, ranging If feasible, pile drivers should not be from 95 dB(A) to 105 dB(A) used Mitigable Noise levels associated with Construction activities should not commence construction of the outfall booster before 7:30 a.m. nor extend past the hour station and replacement of pumps in of 500 p.m. or the hours stipulated by Headworks C at Plant 12 are expected local ordinances. Low noise level equip- to range from 70 dB(A) to 96 dB(A) ment and noise barriers should be used. within 50 feet of the equipment being If feasible, pile drivers should not be used. These levels should not result used in nuisance noise levels off the site PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) Mitigable Community noise sources of greatest Nearly all the noise associated with concern if not controlled are internal operations can be mitigated by enclosure combustion engines, centrifugal blowers of noisy operations; selection of low-noise or turbines. equipment; and scheduling of operations to avoid nighttime operation of vehicles on local surface streets. Workers can be protected by participating in safety training programs and using protective hearing equipment. All future facilities and many existing facilities will be enclosed for odor control purposes. This will also reduce noise. Area o Concern Impact status Impacts Mitigation Measures ,Economic Factors PRIMARY: Construction iPositive Impact District funds are available to No mitigation measures are required complete the projects without neces- sitating additional revenue-raising actions. Additional jobs will be created through the design of the facilities, construction, and the administration of contracts PRIMARY: Operational: Impact The present operating budget of $23.6 No mitigation measures are required million will probably increase by $2.4 million. The increase will occur as a result of improvements made as part of the environmental mitigation projects proposed SECONDARY ..Positive Impact The economy of Orange County is expected "Provide employment opportunities and to prosper with increased development affordable housing and require new development to pay for capital improve meets needed to accommodate growth Health and Safety 'Cons derat ons PRIMARY: Operational ,Mitigable Covering and treating air streams will Cover or enclose existing and new facilities reduce the concentration of organic to minimize odors, aerosols, and volatile gases volatilized during wastewater compound emissions: purchase and maintain treatment best available safety equipment; and con- , tinue to conduct safety and training classes l Area of Concern Impact Status Impacts Mitigation Measures Energy/Reeource - Comm tment PRIMARY: Operational Partially Mitigable Energy: Based on a 24 MGD increase, Energy: Cogeneration and heat recovery it is estimated that for each million projects will reduce energy usej ,reduce gallons of wastewater per B.K. treated, chlorine sodium hydroxide and activated 11,000 cubic feet of digester gas, carbon use to the lowest possible level= 595 Kilowatt hours of electricity and consider use of digester gas in District 1,000 cubic feet of natural gas will be vehicles utilized. Energy consumption by odor control systems and chemical and con- sumable materials are also quite high Nuisance Factors PRIMARY: Construction The most significant nuisance conditions See mitigation measures under individual likely to occur are odor and traffic, subject headings Odors will be greatest when tie-ins with existing facilities occur or when start up of operations commence PRIMARY: Operational See operational impacts under individual See operational mitigation measures under subject individual subject headings Area of Concern Impact Status Impacts Mitigation Measures Ener /Resource Comm tment PRIMARYs Operational Partially Mitigable Energy: Based on a 24 MGD increase, Energy: Cogeneration and heat recovery it is estimated that for each million projects will reduce energy use; reduce gallons of wastewater treated, chlorine sodium hydroxide and activated 11,000 cubic feet of digester gas, carbon use to the lowest possible level; 595 Kilowatt hours of electricity and consider use of digester gas in District 1,000 cubic feet of natural gas will be vehicles utilized. Energy consumption by odor control systems and chemical and con- sumable materials are also quite high Nuisance Factors PRIMARY: Construction The most significant nuisance conditions See mitigation measures under individual likely to occur are odor and traffic. subject headings odors will be greatest when tie-ins with existing facilities occur or when start up of operations commence PRIMARY: Operational See operational impacts under individual See operational mitigation measures under subject individual subject headings C ` l • Definitions Prima, Im acts: Those impacts which are directly associated with construction and operation of the proposed pro acts. Construction Im acts: Relatively short-term impacts which will occur during the construction of the facilities or mprovements. They can range from excavation-associated changes in the soil profile to traffic increases associated with construction worker commuting and deliveries of building materials and equipment. Operational Impacts: Impacts associated with operation of the completed facilities. These can be either increases or decreases in existing usage patterns for energy, chemicals, air pollutant emissions, expenditures for operation and maintenance or supplies. Operational improvements can reduce these impacts, while the addition of new facilities may change existing conditions either positively (i.e. , reduced odors i or energy use) , or negatively Imore employees required, hence increased commuting) . Secondary Impacts. Indirect impacts associated with project implementation or accommodation of new urban development. These impacts are numerous in nature and relate to all the activities, needs and demands associated with continued development or redevelopment of portions of the Districts' service area. These impacts are not generated or controlled in any way by the District, but are associated indirectly by their provision of increased treatment capacity to service planned and approved urban growth of member' agencies. Miti pratio eon Masures: Measures taken to reduce, minimize or eliminate environmental impacts or the effects o a ce t. Mitigation can include the following: 1) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action. 2) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation. 3) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment. 4) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action. 5) Compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. i i '• The Districts will cooperate with agencies responsible for implementing these measures. See Table 2 for a partial listing of agencies. RESOLUTION AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS JULY 10, 1985 - -30 P.M. FUND NO 9f i - JI VIST MORNING CAPITAL f. PAOFITSING DATE FA61 1 f .1 3 RTPOKT NUMUF^ 41`43 -y COUATY SANITATION 61STRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I--� CLAIPS PAT[) 36/12/AS s 61"RANT NO. VCNVOR AMOUNT OESCRIPIION 074702 ABC LUMBER CORE. $41.24 HARDWARE -' 074783 ABC METALS SUPPLY. INC. $135.42 STEEL 074764 AGM ELECTRONICS. INC. fb35.39 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074785 _ AIR CALIFORNIA 1188.0n AIR FARE 07,1786 ALLIED CORPORATION fl7.726.20 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 074787 AMERICAN AIR FILTER. INC. $450.17 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES __074788 AMERICAN COMPRESSOR PAR7S $3.297.90 COMPRESSOR 074769 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING $47.08 PUBLICATION a 474790 ANAHEIM BUSINESS MACHINES S52.50 OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR 074791 ANAHEIM_SEWER CONSTRUCTION 42.047.1J0 REPAIR SEWER LINE - DIST. 7 TTT 074792 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 1778.94 PUMP PARTS 'T- 074793 ANDREY COMPANY 61.J10.49 HARDWARE C7 074794 _ _ ABMCO INC. $9,178.12 PIPE REPAIR KITS - 07�795 ARROU-RISCO. INC. $497.76 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 974796 ASSOCIATED DIESEL 1391.92 TRUCK REPAIR 074797. RALPH W._ATKINSON _ 4959.2B PUMP PARTS =; 074798 BNN CORPORATION S4.381.69 SLUDGE DISPOSAL 074799 BRYLESS STATIONERS $280.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES ' 074800 BEARINGS. INC. 1118.47 BEARINGS 10O)- BECKMAN'INSTRIIMENTS S;84.07 LAB SUPPLIES 074802 BECKMAN INDUSTRIAL ( S2.808.07 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1 074803 PAUL BERGER_ON 115.99 _ EMPLOYEE MILEAGE a DE 074 04 RRYMAN 6 SiCPMEI/SON♦INC f739.87 ENGINEERING 2-6-2 r 079805 BER iECH $43.18 TOOLS r 074BQ6 ____. BEVCO _INDUSTRIAL VEHICLES $645.96 TRUCK PARTS C 071807 016 BOX RENTAL CO. $2.865.00 TRASH DISPOSAL �. 074808 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS f2D5.41 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS [A 074809 BOMARLAQLICIO.SEBVICEI. INC. _ _ $317.47 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 079810 MICHAEL BRANDHAN ASSOCIATES 12.968.09 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARATION 071811 WILLIAM H. BUTLER 3I.J55.35 PETTY CASH 074822, C 0 R RECONDITIONING CO. 5644.u4 PUMP REPAIR --I 07A017 ---- - - CS OOIIPANY $1,004.78 VALVES Cn 074014 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. $316.99 LAB SUPPLIES 074815 CAL-WEST INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS $1,802.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 071816 CRL7FORNIA 'ASSDCIATIDN OF SANITARY AGENCIES $440.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 074817 CAREY SIGN 6RAFNICS $769.30 PARKING LOT SIGNS 074818 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $5.462.46 ENGINEERING P2-25-2 674819 - CHR ISCERVELLONF. $29.73 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 074820 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $3.520.74 GASOLINE/OIL 074821 THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION $210.00 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 074622 - GARY E. COATE 112.92 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 074823 COLS-PARMER INSTRUMINT CO. S57.39 LAB SUPPLIES 074824 C.I.E.S. . CO. . INC. S543.DG ENGINE REPAIR 074825 CONNELL CHEVROLET 416.32 TRUCK PARTS 074826 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $2,178.37 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074827 CONSOLIDATED REPRODUCTIONS sB7.45 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTIONS E 1 FUND NO ?Iq' - JT DIST WCRKIV4 CAPITAL PROCCESIN6 BATT FACE = REPORT 9UM9fR AFA3 CEUNIT SANITATIUN DISTRICTS OF Okf MGE COUNTY 1 CLAIMS PAID i6/12/P5 J 3 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION R74828 CONTINENTAL RADIATOR - 137.3.47 TRUCK REPAIR 074829 CONTROL DATA COPP. s10.422. 56 PROCESS CONTROL COMPUTER REPAIRS 074830 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES f1.JX1.12 _ 074831 COSTA MESA AUTO PARTS, INC. 576.28 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES - 674832 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 1813.38 TRUCK PARTS G74833 DECO ft.TI 9.'.0 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES _ 074834 OEPARTP.ENT OF GENERAL SERVICES $63.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES G?iB35 DICKSON SAFETY PRODUCTS CO. $333.69 PUBLICATION 074836 DIETERICM - POST CO. SAFETY SUPPLIES p 281.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES �_D74837_-_ _. OIFI LiPPO ASSOCIATES $2B5.G} PRINTING T 0748SS DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $398.80 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 074839 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $17.398.33 REPLACE BUDO CHAIN 074840 DORR-OLIVER. INC. 31.413.3q PUMP PARTS ® - 074841 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. f66 q.96 PAINT SUPPLIES 074842 EASTMAN. INC. f2.401.U2 OFFICE SUPPLIES -1 074843 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO. f13.099.48 CONTROL PANELS-SARI 6TINFLgIER OIVE0.510N 67 i841-- --- FMC CORP. SIB8.98 PUMP PARTS / 074845 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $22.00 s_074646 _ FILTER STIFFLY CO. $2.728.58 DELIVERY SERVICE 07q ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Dql FISHER CONTROLS CO. $49.29 REGULATORS 074848 FISHER CONTROLS INIL..INC. $12.13 REGULATORS 1 074699 _FLAT i _ ERjjCAL_.§9"CRETE 3}69.7@ CONCRETE CUTTING Y_ _ . _.. n 074850 �ONALD L. FOX s ASSOCIATES. - - $825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 074851 FREDERICK PUMP s ENGINEERING 9149.80 PUMP PARTS -__ 074852 _ FREEUAT TRUCK PARTS $1,143.38 TRUCK PARTS -074 BS] CITY OF FULLERTON $14.63 WATER USEAGE B74854 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $243.80 07485S _ AN GEM-OI-LIVE PLASTICS CORPI s24r82 LUMBER 074856 GENERAL SEMI EONVI' - - - 3193.45 PLASTIC SHEETING STUFFING 80% SEALANT .� 079857 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S56 B.52 TELEPHONE 074856 GIERLICH-MITCMELL. INC. 13.278.91 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES fa- 074859 - GOULD PUMPS. INC. il.OB9.28 i172.67 PUMP PARTS C% 074861 HARK NGTONINDUSTRIAL LAB SUPPLIES 074661 _HARK IN GTON INOUS TRI AL PLASTICS $179.78 PIPE SUPPLIES -379P62 NBUSE 61 BAITER TES f236.58 BATTERY 074863 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. 2524.87 PAINT SUPPLIES 074861 CITY OF HUNTINGTON PFACM 1111.79 WATER USEAGE 074865 HURLEY ELECTRONICS. INC. $12.18 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074866 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL CO. $12,143.21 FERRIC CHLORIDE 074867 _ _ INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE f418.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES �7i8EB IRVTNE RANCH WATER DISTRICT s4.00 WATER USEAGE 074869 IRVINE SWEEPING SERVICE 14511.30 SWEEPING SERVICE 074070 THE JANITORS SHQFPE 1503.67 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 074871 JONES CHEMICALS. INC. 32.556.19 CHLORINE 074872 KEEN-KUT ABRASIVE CO. 1381.60 TOOLS 074673_ KELCO SALES 0 ENGINEEPING ('0. 5233.68 PIPE SUPPLIES 3 I I f % FUND NO ` 19 - JT GIST VOLMIN6 CAPITAL ` Ep Of FSSINO DATi 6/.15/ITS IAGI ' 2 ACT OPT NUMIICM AI'45 a CGUN7Y SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OhANGE COUNTY " W CLAIMS PAID 16/12/05 2 VAGRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION _ 074874 KING BEARING/ INC. $562.69 BEARINGS 079875 ALEEN-LINE CORP $626.14 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 074876 DON L. ALINE $115.21 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 074977 ,ROPE MIST CoRpt }47.03 SPRAY COOLANT 074879 L.B.W.S.. INC. J66.78 WELDING SUPPLIES 074679 LAURSEN COLOR LAB S502.49 FILM PROCESSING 074880 LEE L RO CONSULTING ENCP. S45'89O.J0 ENGINEERING P2-29 074881 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY $32.71 SAFETY SUPPLIES A 074882 LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS. INC. $49.30 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0174083 LILL Y. TYP ESE7YING }15 r90 PRINTING Z 074 RR9 j1ABVAC ELECTRONICS S1 1.23 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C 074085 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP $172.78 EQUIPMENT PARTS 0748e6 MECHANICAL Dp1YE SYSTEMS }133.15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 67ABB7 MED-TOX ASSOCIATES, INC. $4r475.00 REMOVAL 6 DISPOSAL OF ASBESTOS 074888 -- MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. *714.56 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 0748tl9 _.,FADE B._H17EHELL $66.67 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 3 074890 NAFCO $323.22 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074891 NATIONAL PLANT SCRVICES. INC. $6.462.50 OIL SPILL CLEANUP/DISPOSAL _ 079892 ___ NEELY t yALNERI INC. }95.52 WELDER REPAIR 0 074893 NEW HERMES, INC. $221.64 EQUIPMENT PARTS 074894 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. f2.395.47 CAUSTIC SODA 1 074895 OLYMPIC OO CAL„_CP. ... .. . .... .. . . 1133.995.33 CHLORINE n 074896 ORITEX CORP $337.58 BEARINGS r-. 074897 OXYGEN SERVICE $199.83 NITROGEN _[=074098 __ COUNTY OF ORANGE. 132394.09 CONTRACTOR 2-10-IA 079899 CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTROLR f121.240.CO SLUDGE DISPOSAL .� 074900 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $971.32 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND CL) 074901 PPINDUS Tg1E£1 THE.. .. 11,701.95 PAINT SUPPLIES 079902 pAC 1FIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $126.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES r.-. 074903 PACIFIC BELL A190.85 TELEPHONE 074904 PERORIDATION SYSTIMSI INC. }15.301.65 PEROXIDE 07990b NARfIL6 PNiMR05l'i CE 160.00 ICE 074906 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY $1,549.33 EQUIPMENT PARTS 079907 _PROGRESSIVE STEEL SUPPLY f2q 7r 15 STEEL 074908 FU MP ENGINEEBiNG $1,585.39 PUMP PARTS 074909 RACAL - VADIC $182.47 EQUIPMENT REPAIR ___... 074910 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. S355.JO TRASH DISPOSAL 0 Y4911 REO 'VALVE'CO.; INC. $1.337.59 PIPE SUPPLIES 074913 REYNOLDOBBINS ALUMINUM SUPPLY CO. .R5A.77 PUMP 074913 _ RODBIMS 8 TMYERSRUCK INC. fLR5R.92 TRUCK -074974 � �' '� ROCCO rSTP UCN VP ECN ING 6689.J0 TRUCK PARTS 074915 JOSCPH T. RYERSON L SON. INC. 53ll.22 STEEL 074916 SANCON INC. A100.00 DIGESTER REPAIR 074917 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $614.58 ELECTRIC MOTOR 074918 CITY OF SEAL BEACH SI23.JA WATER USEAGE _074919 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,665.13 70015 2 a 1 w s = FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WOHNINE CAIITAL PROCESSING DAIC 6/.'./H5 PACE 4 REF04T UUKDCR AP43 COUNTY SANITATION PIS74ICTS OF ORANGE. COUNTY S CLAIMS PAID :16112/85 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT GESCRIPIICN 074920 SMITH-EMERY CO. . 172.V0 SOILS 074921 SOUTH COAST DODGE 353.1 TRUCK R TESTING 074922 SOUTH COAST OFFICE EGUIFMF.NT f576.64 TRUCK PARTS OFFICE FURNITURE _074923 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $235.863.58 074924 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. S9.17 WATER WATER USEAGE 079425 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 56.594.96 DIESEL FUEL 074926 SPEEDE SPEEDOMETER $47.)2 TRUCK PARTS 074927 SPIESS CONSTRUCTION CO. 112.861.JO BUBBLE DIFFUSER INSTALLATION-PLANT I 074926 STAROY STEEL $316.41 STEEL 7 074929 _ SUPER CHFM CORP $802.42 ¢- 1749]0 THE SUPPLIERS S439.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES TOOLS 7 074931 YAK TAKAMINE f2.080.00 079532 TEPC OT INC. LANDSCAPING 079933 LETHA THOMAS $95.93 PORTABLE AIR CLEANER + '074934 THREE M CO. .18 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 516365.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES EI 074935 TRAVEL TRAVEL 474. AIR FARE �37W936' � TP UCk iAU70 SUPPLY. INC. 13.979.86tl6 TRUCK PARTS j 074937 J.G. TUCKER L SON. INC. $1.458.26 PUMP PARTS 074938 UNION SIGN CO. $59.56 SIGNS FOR PARKING LOT-PLANT074939 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $82.85 DELIVERY SERVICE I B74940 UNITED STATES EQUIP. CO.. INC. $107.04 ENGINE PARTS 074941 UNIVERSAL MACK }i1y.96 TRUCK PARTS 074942 ---RL URSIC-. ----- $17.60 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 074944 V.O.C. TESTING $11853.87 EMISSION TESTING OF DIGESTERS 079444 ____ _ VYR SCIENTIFIC 3).B53.ti7 LAB SUPPLIES - 079940yALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2.650.61 074946 VALVE SERVICES. INC. $79.55 HARDWARE n VALVE REPAIR 074947 _____ CAPL Y. VIEWED f?}e�8 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE a 4948 VOSTEVI COMPANY - $432.85 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1 074949 JOHN R. WAPLFS $388.54 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTING 0T9950 WASTE WATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS S130.D0 n- 074951 MAUk ESMA ENGINE' SERVICENTER i244 yy SEMINA0. REGISTRATION 074952 WESTERN WERE L ALLOY S ENGINE PARTS 2 . TOOLS 074953 WESCO $823.62 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES B.*'D. WHETSTONE L ASSOCIATES f3.275.8585 USER FEE EDP SERVICES-DIST I C 5 074955 WHITE, FINE L VERVILLE $1.519.15 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY _ 074956 WILSON FORD SALES $38.16 TRUCK PARTS 074957 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATI'S $1,085.15 VALVE 07495 CHRIB NORBY .59 DIRECTORS COMPENSATION 6 MILEAGE _079959 _ JO MN A. TXOH AS $ 154194.52 DIRECTORS COMPENSATION L MILEAGE TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 16/12/65 fG17.S5e.7U a y FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/05/85 PACE 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REPORT NUMBER AP43 Ln CLAIMS PAID 06/12/85 a SUMMARY AMOUNT /1 OPER FUND $ 3,006.99 /2.01PER FUND 1,245.03 /2 ACO FUND 13,839.35 #2 F/R FUND 2,092.67 /3 OPEN FUND 743.89 _ 03 ACO FUND 99.13 /5 OPEN FUND 1,207.05 /6 OPEN FUND 59.73 A /7.OPEN FUND 4.189.67 FTT 7 F%R FUND 1,349.54 Z III OPER FUND 89.00 C /566 OPER FUND 37.39 A6j OPEN FUND 3,396.21 JT OPER FUND 494,682.86 --1 CORF_ 96.097.26 SELF FNNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 971.32 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 54,249.60 ra� TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 6/12/85 $677,356.70 a r d a a :e. 1 Ln a ,FUND MO "1 `±^ - Jl Y151 bC14 INC C,l II .I mf0(i'S Ir F. :ell r/.' /" .AG( �, ,. F.IPURI HU.'lft±' AF45 ' 1 i,)UNl'f yAl'I7ATION TISIF:ICTS OF OFANGL COUNTY I-•+ CL AIMS FAIO P6126145 WARRANT N0. VENIIGP AR VON T OT SC4If TION --0;4A72— ---------AYC INCUkF OH ATGO 4704.22 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT 074973 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTOR$• IMC. s16.354.40 INSTALLATION OF PRESSURE RELIEF BYPASS . pjg97q ALLIED ANALYTICAL SYSTIHS $136.76 LAB SUPPLIES 131,331.44 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 074976 AMERICAN AIR FILTER. INC. $231.24 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES U75977 AMERICAN COKFRFSS08 PARTS $2.676.17 COMPRESSOR a.-:.7gR7p------ANLRICAN-SOIENFIFIC FPOOUCTS - 1229.59 LAB SUPPLIES 074919 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $42.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 071980 ANAHEIM SEDER CONSTRUCTION $975.00 SEWER LATERAL REPAIRS-DIS7 /7 8E-SHE-ANGM9R- 6KI"G--00r----.-__. '______ .- '3 L.905.II8-_'"-"_- '"--'- PIPE SUPPLIES :_-_I $74982 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICCS ORCUP $100.06 TOWEL RENTAL t 074983 ARROW-KISCO. INC. 1657.28 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES .M D4-08, AUBIO-6RAPMEFSYSIEMS -- -- --- - - 1241.15 - _ - OFFICE EQUIPMENT 17g985 - AUTOCON INDUSTRIES. INC 4102.01 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS �:•�'•.9 ..i BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC. 968.55 TOOLS RI-0.7�47----BKK fRRPORAiiBN -' f90.003.79-----'-_* SLUDGE DISPOSAL .= 074988 PECKHAM INDUSTRIAL $1,657.27 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT @ 074999 J.P. BEECHCR ASSOC.. INC. a185.21 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TOOLS B70993.. OFERLY i ASSOCIATES. INC. $550,00 WORKERS COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION .-.Q7g99g BLACK L DECKER MPG. CO. SBO.02 TOOL REPAIR q.. A"K-Nf0J+AL- .rftl 22tA-00-' EMPLOYEE-MEDICAL-EXAMS b 074994 BUSINESS MONITOR $86.00 SUBSCRIPTION r D74995 WILLIAM H. BUTLER $1.616.37 PETTY CASH r. p}g996- ifhR-R E60NOI i-IONIWG CO ------- -- - '1,195.00 - ' - - ROTOR REPAIR t7 074997 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. $53.87 LAB SUPPLIES -.-� 07g998 CALIFORNIA ENVIRDNMINTAL 51.395.0D FLOW METER RENTAL �3—en.nma_— J011"ARALLO-ENGINE ENS ---- - $5,629.12 ENGINEERING P2-29-2 075000 JOHN CARDLI.O ENGINEFRC f67.504.92 ENGINEERING PI-21. P2-28-1 b P2-28-2 075002 CHF.SSELL CORP. 1L02.45 EQUIPMENT PARTS --0 7O002 -- - - CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. 13.615.6E MOTOR OIL vj 0750P3 CIVIC CENTER LOCK IF SAfF $14.115 HARDWARE 076001 CORINNE CLAWSON 417.43 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE G;f A08----MIKE-CGLL INS ENIEkFPISFIS 1244.33 TRUCK PARTS 075006 CONSOLTOATEC ELECTRICAL. Oltl. 11. 11L.15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0750U7 CGN$OLTDAIED REPRU0UC7TOGS 13.369.54 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTIONS _ 07580E -- - CONTINENTAL AIM TOO15. INC . 1310.:1O TOOL RENTAL 075009 CONTINFNTAL RADIATO7. 11.g27.N2 TRUCK REPAIR 075010 CONTROL DATA CORT. 17SO.!V EQUIPMENT REPAIR --046G11-- CONTROL DAIA COF1,014lT10N I61.779.t1: CONTRACTOR P2-23-6 075012 COOPER ENERGY STKVICT$ 11.537.12 ENGINE PARTS 075013 COUT.TY UHOLESALC F,LIYT;A( 3973.3F ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES _.. C75G14 JCAFY CkOSS PAVINA III.Pf.}.M9 PARKING LOT PAVING-PLANT 1 675015 Cm MATCR 1g35.1!i WATER SOFTENER RENTAL 0750I6 STAFF OF CALTF0RNIA 430'.^.I ANNEXATION 159 PROCESSING FEE —475017 STt IE CF CALIFOPkIA -b9I .70 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL TAX N C FUND NO .1T nl<.I WOFKINF YtI II ': FrDi 551e,' :ul� (/? /4• FAr! REPOKI 1.11441"H AY43 n N �:U6TY `. :uIr4110i< '•I`.TRIC1S OF GFIMEf COL'HTY rL..I kS AIP ;6126/45 WARRANT NG. Vr NOnr .%r(.UNI i :]iF 1rIION C75411, DKt., INC. 1G5.71 FREIGHT CHARGES 075019 AAIIY TILDE 144.uO LEGAL ADVERTISING 075620 PECKEP INSTFUHCAIT SUFF LY CO. $291.90 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES -C75621 GECO 11 ,564.2E ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES . 075r22 DCIST-UTNSFIELC, INC $2,277.0i INSTALL BUBBLE DIFFUSER SYSTEM CONTROLS 075023 OE4^LAP SALES K SFRVICi 1256.72 PIPE SUPPLIES ____ 075024 OICKSONS $61h.4K ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 075025 CECO COMPANY INC. 1419.64 TRUCK PARTS :1>075026 rj1FTF.k ICH - FOS7 CO. A31.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES --ma751127-...._.... DIFILIFPO ASSOCIAIES 1427.42 PRINTING =0751!28 DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. 121.971.54 REPLACEMENT OF BUDD CHAIN C7075r29 CORP-OLIVER, INC. $1.411.34 PUMP PARTS n075039 DUMN LOWARDS CCI,F. $2.122.35 PAINT SUPPLIES 075031 EASTMAN, INC. $2,828.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES --4L75032 ENCHANTER, INC. i3.500.00 OCEAN MONITORING FAMILIAR PIPE L SUPPLY S695.55 PIPE SUPPLIES '�C75039 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $40.56 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES .t;075035 FISCHER 0 FOLTLR CO. i8.07.29 VALVES ' I ' 075W36_... __._ .......- FLO•SYSTE'MS $58.64 PIPE SUPPLIES CD075037 CLIFFORD A. FORKERT 18.707.52 ENGINEERING 5-19-112 1 075038 DONALD L. FOX 8 ASSOCIATES $825.30 SAFETY CONSULTANT nzsn S 7WE-ROKBORO-COMPANY - --- -- S154.43 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES :r-075990 F'REDERICK PUMP L EMGINEEGINI $74.94 PUMP PARTS 1r-_075D41 FR 7[K-GAL LAGXFP MFG. $54.08 FREIGHT CHARGES -075042----- .. PROBE LNSINEERINC SEKVICIS CO. $278.115 VALVES L7075L'g3 CITY OF FULLER70N i100.63 WATER USEAGE y075D49 GAARATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY i1.258.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ,IN.5.045 ---GAS-LMCX-.PRODUCTS ,-INC.. - $6,053.60 WOOD SHAVINGS �0075046 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.557.5q TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES '-'-"D75048 61ERLICH-MITCHELL, INC, i65.SE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES --,-1 i50A8__-_. -. - .GL OtlfL COMPUTCR SUPPLIES $143.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES C/)075049 GOULD PUMPS, INC. 4723.35 PUMP PARTS .075050 GRAPHIC CCNIROLS S199.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES �T5051 GR IFR-IR-ELI'CTNCHICS S3.711.P1 REFUND OF DEPOSIT 075652 GFDRCE T. HALL CO. s47.23 PIPE SUPPLIES 075053 HALPP.IN SUPPLY CO. s556.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ____CT5954 HALSIEP L MOGGAN, INC.. L91.90 PUMP PARTS 075055 HAMILTON INSTRUMENTS 3117.11 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 07595E FARMINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASI IL-S S14.86 HARDWARE ---0-75057 W.C. HENDRIF L CO., INC. $q. )38.01 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 075058 HOLMrS TUTTLE OPTSU4 1314.06 TRUCK PARTS G75059' I:0'12011 IiIGY -FE.4C1' $661 .35 CYLINDERS -- C75260 CITY OF IIUN7INCTON 11`4CH 112.7V WATER USEAGE 075061 IUNTINCTOI' BEACH Ii,1FF1( l74PP 436..1A OFFICE SUPPLIES 075062 ISCO CONF4e:Y 16.252.13 PUMP .7F063__ .. INr USTkIAL YHRCADFI. I'KCOUCI� 17P.45 HARDWARE bO 1 N BRAND NO 91k9 - JT LIST WO6KINF C7111A1. PROCLSSING DATF 6/2, 1L5 1-AGI 0.LCORT MUMdER APU COUNTY SANITATION OISTBICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .' _ CLAIMS FAIR .16/26/85 WARRANT NO. - -.--VENDOR --- - AMOUNT CCSCRIPTION �0}006A------- -THE JANITORS SHOFFL S36A8 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES I' 075065 JOT CHEMICAL CO. $1 .710.J0 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ,. 075066,. RAN SAFETY PRODUCTS $76,27 SAFETY SUPPLIES �0ii0N "`bG 0-B ALE9 -L-EN65NEFRING CD. ---' "' ""' 246.91 RUBBER PRODUCTS I' 675068 KING BEARING, INC. $1.663.19 BEARINGS !, a75069 NIMBI PUMP t MACHINE WORKS S1.661.95 PUMP PARTS �76070 -KLFfN-LINE-GORP $110.80 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 075071 DON L. KLINE $20.09 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE *VA75072 GEOFFREY KREUTZER $160.00 DESIGN PANEL WORKSTATIONS b It __...-___._ ._- .._._.__._.__._. UNIFORM RENTAL. T.0750.74 L.D.W.S.,}INC- UFP H'-'CO-�-- -' 'S1r 36.81'""-' 0750)9 L.O.W.B.♦ INC. $ 991.31 OXYGEN 073075 LAB CO NCO CORP S91.Sf LAB SUPPLIES Dy} : LAURSEN-GOLOR-LAB---- """-"" "'- 63/5.62 FILM PROCESSING .,+ 075077 LERNER PHOTO, INC. $16.79 FILM PROCESSING .075078 LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. 3523.72 - -- ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES k0i INiK-E6-*I-N -"FY1359':'l l'---'--"' "'CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 075080 THE CHARLES LOWE CO. 5113.25 PUMP PARTS 075081 LOWRY t ASSOCIATES S5.926.28 ENGINEERING 2-25 -0-;008e" MARPi'-AriOYRV-6-AGSOG.,-INC. """' --- """ ' $871.06 " ' MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES . CD 075083 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $93.57 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1 07508A MAY KATA[LE ,. S4.500.60 LAN05CAPING -PLANT 2 _..____.- . $45.61.. . 1 038088--MAii---EH L9N,-FN E.--- -- __. ....._ _.. . FREIGHT CHARGES D 075086 MCSAIN INSTRUMFNTS $292.43 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT r 075087 MENESSON CHEMICAL CO. S2.166.00 HYDROCHLORIC ACID ---07.5G0G----PCNASTCR-GARO`bUFPLY CO. $210.86 TOOLS 17 075089 MF-T[A MAST[R, INC. s15090 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES E=0 MINE SAFETY APFLIANCFS CO. S895.97 PUMP PARTS }----MONO-GROUPr'INC.---' -" $183.37 FREIGHT CHARGES W 075092 MONTGOMERY ELEVATOR CGRP&NV S328.4R ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE ^' U75093 J. ARTHUR MOORE, CA. IAC. S1 .391.76 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 076094 MOTOROLA, INC. s10.955.09 MOBILE RADIO-INDUSTRIAL WASTE DIVISION C/A 075095 NATIONAL LUMRFM $736.15 HARDWARE 075096 NATIONAL PLANT SERVIL'FS. INC. S5.375.35 TV INSPECTION OF SEVER LINES --0i6090--NFN -14FPMFS. INC. 561 .5A EQUIPMENT PARTS 075098 OCH REPROGRAPHICS, INC. 51.273.76 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTION 0 75 099 OCCIIENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. $3.111.81 CAUSTIC SODA -- 675100 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. 461.951.63 CHLORINE 075101 ORANGE VALVL It FITTING CO. 1917.18 PIPE SUPPLIES 075102 ORITER CORP 12.918.611 ORITEK SHEETING - RIPJOIP- - - OSROFNF LABORATORIES, IRE'. 51.137.31 PIPE INSPECTION 075/OA COUNTY OF ORANGE 1N.161.M8 RADIO EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE C75105 COUNTY SANITATION OIC111CY 197, .N9 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND C75106 F.F .T. INSTRUmw CO. 1.3911.62 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 075107 FFG IKOUSILIES, IPl1. SS7A.4A PAINT SUPPLIES 075106 1 P.A. FMIMTIN6 $35S.0 PRINTING --076100 PACIFIC. SAFETY FOUl"PI MY Ir, 117P.f.9 SAFETY SUPPLIES t� C - WNo NO •1:�: .. .n ulsl NC4FIN.. C1. 1111 1FOrt SLI;.. I :Ti W RECOPT Nln"If.i �r a1 .p is 31'N I 11.11110 IGP 1141 s 1CIS OF UR AIXI CnUF11Y = CLI INS 1111, .E/P4/h9 ,WARRANT NO. Vr NUD I: ANOUNI 6t.:,CA l r l l OM -- 1175110 PAI'It IC Is ELL S603. 11 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES 075111 PART$ UNLIMITED LI.156.14 TRUCK PARTS 075112 CMAPLES P•ASIMLI SIP.35 'EMPLOYEE MILEAGE -01h113 PArTEN CORP. 4234.53 STRIP CHARTS 075114 POSIMASTEn $2.•'31.1'1 POSTAGE 075115 FPFCISION GASMfT 1243.94 COMPRESSOR PARTS -.075116 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 16V.0C ICE 076117 GUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY Su4.:18 CONTRUCTION MATERIAL 075118 NADIRS TOOL S ARRA.SIVL CO. 4195.71 TOOLS -CPI-0 7 5 119-------- TOF. PF616TF.4 S2.593.52 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 075320 TIIF REGISTLR S9JJ.4N LEGAL ADVERTISING d 075121 RENIIORD. INC. 763•J.4B ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -075122-.. REYNDLD ALUMINUM SUPPLY CU. $472.92 ALUMINUM 075123 RICO" CORP f296.('C COPIER LEASE 075324 JOSEPH T. NYFRSON L SON. INC. $200.90 STEEL -67-6326-- -- -- SAS-NIFE-INC. $3.568.83 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 075126 YVONNF SCHWAB $7.16 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ?t 075127 SC IF NCr 1741. 10 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING -I-4 07512R- --- - ---Sd ANROCN SUPPLY $1.7114.29 TOOLS m 075129 SMITH-ENEMY CO. S24.00 SOILS TESTING 1 075130 SOUTH COAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT $1.343.50 OFFICE FURNITURE �SdEIS1 LOUTMF.RN-GALIF.-EDISON CO. --__._ .._._.. __. $107,926.33 '- " ' POWER 074132 SO. CAL. GAS CO. 543.7U4.75 NATURAL GAS r 075133 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 112,961.43 DIESEL FUEL 0T5134---.__._.._. SP Oft NLETTS DRINKING WATFF $1 .396.49 BOTTLED WATER h 075135 STATFFA CONTROL SYSTEMS $42.94 DAMPER MOTOR C,) 075136 STAROW STEFL 1319.49 STEEL -075117 S148.63 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE �7 075138 THE SUPPLIERS $1,144.92 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 075139 SWEETLAND CO. $84.64 PIPE SUPPLIES -075140 - _... CASTLE / DIV. OF SYI1kON CG6P. $201.75 LAB MAINTENANCE Cl) 075141 F.M. THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING S2.9g7.G8 INSTALL WATER COIL 075192 TROMPS UN LACQUER CO. $1,526.55 PAINT SUPPLIES -0IM43-----_CHANNON-.C. TIA --- $22.55 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 67E144 TRANSAMERICA OFLAVAL. INC. $444.74 ENGINE 0751a5 TRAVEL TkAVrL f-366.:19 AIR FARE ---075146 - - 7AF.FAIL CAPITAL CORD GF CALIF . 1525.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES P75347 TRUCK C AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $1,151.13 TRUCK PARTS 075148 J.G. TUCKER L SON. INC. $25J.84 SAFETY SUPPLIES --MIA%-------..- U.S. .AU70 r.LASS. IN( , II6S.36 TRUCK PARTS 075150 UNION OIL CO. OF CAI If . $110..57 GASOLINE 075151 UN1rLU P4SCEL 117E VI CC tiq 1.76 DELIVERY SERVICE -- - 475152 Vh EC IFNITFIC ii.490.37 LAB SUPPLIES 079153 Vn I.L'.Y CITIES SU/'PLY rV. 1,81.17 PIPE SUPPLIES 07!•154 VAL V1. SAPVICrS. INC. II15."J VALVE REPAIRS -0-5155- VFRIFY ftUSSINF55 INI1 it It ir5 Ih.5R4.fr4 OFFICE FURNITURE 1 r �SUNC NU tl jr -:ISI .LnR1E. ..I li:l 1',.00I `SITP ,•: (: (.P' ./•a rAll R'7QY1 LJY'11.. {Y43 Ln C'.Y61Y :.&KIT'.IIC•P 144Tr!ICTS OF ORAKGI. QO)IIIY S CLIIM13 : :IG :5/26/6`.. WARRANT NO. V7:LCb f•a1Hf17 L!.:L61r1 IOb ----475166 xpIIKLSNA {F.PINF :ieVl(r1.i[r ilF e.nq ENGINE PARTS 07F157 93STLRN HIGHUAY PNOPUCIS. ICC• 156-4 SAFETY SUPPLIES 075158 UFSIERM WHOLESALE C^. f1P2.59 TRUCK PARTS 0761 R9--_._.. . _ c, .0, WHETSTONE t 6SEccl4Tr, 19.712.47 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES_ 5 6741hU PUS-SELL WGLD %15.P7 EMPLOYEE GIST 1 t ,ITS)"5)" PDUR 6 W000RO YEE MILEAGE L fF 1U.639.::O EMPLO SERVICES - 76162 - 7LF:UY [OdF. $3.118.71 COPIER LEASE 4.75163 CEORC.E YARDLEY ASSOC V.TES 1938.91 VALVES 175164 EVFRETI H. YORK CO. 1610.56 ENGINE PARTS —7"65--- —JOHN C. CON.-JR. E158.20 DIRECTORS COMPENSATION t MILEAGE C -75166 SAL SAFIFK 579.92 DIRECTORS COMPENSATION t MILEAGE TOTAL CLAIMS PAID )6/2(/R5 $698.018.20 3 C3 BIItlMAHY AMOUNT O 1 /1 OPER FUND $ 6.573.72 A2 OPEN TO, n --. _ _ 10,482.45 - - . �X- /2 ACO FUND 5,453.70 r ®2 F/R FUND 6,177.62 r 83-OPER-FUND __—___.__ ___... 10.881.87 17 ®3 ACO FUND 455.37 (n C— 15 OPER FUND 4.606.03 ec am w No 3,556.24 d!6 OPER FUND 21.00 �-, 17 OPER FUND 4,596.37 n RJ F/R FUND - . . 2.274.08 N®II OPER FUND 10.563.28 013 OPER FUND 93.80 Oil ACO EUND ....-_____— 567.00 /14 SUSPENSE FUND 4,138.22 /566 OPER FUND 2.507.86 —_ 1566 ACO FUND 5,555.40 #667 OPER FUND 1,696.61 JT OPER FUND 331.958.81 �ORF_ . .. ..._. 202,852.56 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 2,974.80 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND R0,061.49 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/26/85 $698.048.28 Ib 1 LJl RESOLUTION NO. 85-97-1 AUTHORIZING FILING FOR FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS 1985-86 JOINT WORKS IMPROVEMENTS AND ADDITIONS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 1251 ET SEQ. , AND STATE GRANT UNDER CLEAN WATER BOND LAW OF 1970 AND/OR 1974, ON BEHALF OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS . 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES # # R # R f # R # # # # # # # # # R The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C. , 1251 at seq.) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. The State Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 and/or 1974 authorizes the State Water Resources Control Board to enter into contracts with public agencies for State grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 3. County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5, of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local sewering agencies, and has joined with other County Sanitation Districts; namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, in constructing, operating and maintaining joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated July 1, 1970, as amended, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 4. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "C=1" acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California, for the purpose of constructing and operating said joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities. Section 5. By means of this resolution and of the resolutions set forth below by number, the following County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, have authorized the filing of applications for grants under said Act of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Law and have authorized County Sanitation District No. 1 to file said application in their behalf. DISTRICT NO. RESOLUTION NO. 2 85-98-2 3 85-99-3 5 85-100-5 kft.� 6 85-101-6 7 85-102-7 11 85-103-11 13 85-104-13 Section 6. J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file for and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, Application for a Federal Grant for Sewage Treatment Works under 33 U.S.C. , 1251 at seq. , and a State Grant for Clean Water under the Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 and/or 1974, for a joint project generally described as follows: 1985-86 Joint Works Improvements and Additions Section 7. District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for County �..� Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, hereby agrees and further does authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if a Federal aC-211 AGENDA ITEM #11(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" grant for its project is made pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control I.w'Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C. , 1251 at seq.) it will pay the remaining cost of the approved project; it will provide proper and efficient operation and maintenance of the approved project after completion of construction thereof; it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (F.L. 88-352) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto and state that the Assurance of Compliance with such regulation attached to the application for Federal grant applies to this project; and it will comply with requirements of Executive Order 11246 pertaining to equal employment opportunity in Federally-assisted construction contracts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(A) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2. . P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. V C. 0. N0. One 1 CONTRACTOR: KIEWIT PACIFIC COMPANY DATE June 21. 1985 REHABILITATION F DIGESTERS C" AND "D' AT PLANT 2 - JOB N0. PW-061R-2 JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS "F" AND "G" AT PLANT 2 - JOB NO. PW-061R-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) $ 13,274.79 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item I CONCRETE REMOVAL, PW-061R-2 - FCO 1 Contractor was directed to remove concrete slab in control room for the lump sum amount of $214.00. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 214.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 2 REMOVAL OF SIDEWALL PENETRATIONS, PW-061R-2 - FCO 2 V Contractor was directed to remove additional sidewall penetrations not indicated on plans for the lump sum amount of $ 9,948.00. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 9,948.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 3 SLUDGE SPILL, PW-061R-3 - FCO 1 Contractor was directed to clean up sludge and debris from overflow on a force account basis for an amount of $1,050.79. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,050.79 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 4 REMOVAL OF ROOF PENETRATIONS, PW-061R-3 - FCO 2 Contractor was directed to remove additional roof penetrations not indicated on plans for a lump sum amount of $2,062.00. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 2,062.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(B) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 ' P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. NSA C. 0. NO. One ( 1) CONTRACTOR: KIFWIT PACIFIC COMPANY DATE June 20, 1985 REHABILITATION OF DIGESTER "C" AND "0" AT PLANT 2 - JOB NO. PW-061R-2 JOB: REHABILITATION OF DIGESTER "F" AND "G" AT PLANT 2 - JOB NO, PW-061R-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) ) $ 13,274.79 TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER S 13,274.79 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME rigina Contract Date March 29, 1985 Original Contract Time 365 Calendar Days Oriainal Completion Date March 28, 1986 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time No Change Revised Completion Date No Change Original Contract Price S 2,435,555,00 Prey. Auth. Changes S 0.00 This Change (Add) ) $ 13,274.79 Amended Contract Price S 2,448,829.79 Board uthorizatlon ate: July 10, 1985 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA ORNIA �...' By de � of Zo -9-t- By Contract r Deputy Chief Engineer "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" COUNT ',ANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGF )UNTY Page 1 of 2, P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENu, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER .: GRANT N0. N/A C. 0. NO. TWO (2) CONTRACTOR: FRANK ULTIMO, GENERAL CONTRACTOR DATE MAY 2. 1985 JOB: LUBE OIL STORAGE TANK AT FOSTER PUMP STATION. PLANT NO. 2 - JOB NO. Pw-129 Amount of this Change Order (:&W) (Deduct) S (689.65) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 DELETION OF PAINTING Contractor is directed to delete painting specified in the specification, to accommodate minor District changes to be made by seperate contract. CREDIT FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (1,203.55) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 INSTALL STOP/LOCK-OUT BUTTON AT PUMP Start station of hand/off/auto station could allow oil reservoir to be overfilled, and Contractor was directed to install a safety control. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 213.90 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3 SEALING OF INTERIOR OF TANK Contractor was directed to seal the tank interior to prevent rusting prior to being put in service. ADDED COSTS THIS CHAINGE ORDER ITEM $ 300.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" COUNT"RANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE '1UNTY page 2 of 2 P. J. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVEiv. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: FRANK ULTIMO, GENERAL CONTRACTOR DATE MAY 2. 1985 JOB: LUBE OIL STORAGE TANK AT FOSTER PUMP STATION, PLANT NO. 2 - JOB NO. Pw-129 Amount of this Change Order (Deduct) S (689,65) TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER $ (689.65) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUN'IARY OF CON";ACT TIME Original Contract Date December 10. 1984 Original Contract Time 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date June 7, 1985 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 2 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 182 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date June 9, 1985 Original Contract Price $ 24,071.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 714.75 This Change (Add) (Deduct) S (689.65) Amended Contract Price 24.0E 95, 10 Board u or zation ate: June 12, 1985 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By / �/L� 6LU 85 By 6 13/85 Contractor eputy ChiefEngineer "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" RESOLUTION NO. 85-105 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-129 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING LURE OIL STORAGE TANK AT FOSTER PUMP STATION, PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-129, AS COMPLETE AMD APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, on June 9, 1985; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated December 10, 1984; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. "F" AGENDA ITEM R11(c) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "�" P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. One ( 1) CONTRACTOR: FRASER CORPORATION DATE June 20, 1985 JOB: FERROUS CHLORIDE SYSTEM FOR DIGESTER GAS SULFIDE REDUCTION - JOB NO. PW-141 Amount of this Change Order (Add) $ 25,097.80 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 REMOVAL OF PIPE OBSTRUCTION, FCO 1 Contractor was directed to remove a 30-inch pipe obstruction not indicated on plans on a force account basis for a total cost of $828.00. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 828.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 2 DRAIN LINE ENCASEMENT, FCO 2 ,.✓Contractor was directed to encase drain line under slab for the lump sum amount of $611.30. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM S 611.30 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 3 INSTALLATION OF AIR AND WATER LINES, FCO 3 Contractor was directed to install 165-feet of 1-inch GSP water line, and 170-feet of 1-inch BSP air line not indicated on the plans for the lump sum amount of $1,993.00. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,993.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 4 ANCHORING PLATES FOR FERROUS CHLORIDE TANKS, FCO 4 Contractor was directed to install four 6-inch square stainless steel anchoring plates not shipped with the tanks for the lump sum amount of $339.50. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 339.50 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days "G-1" AGENDA, ITEM #'ll(D) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF GRANGE COUNTY Pace 2 or 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. One ( 1) CONTRACTOR: FRASER CORPORATION DATE June 20. 1985 J08: FERROUS CHLORIDE SYSTEM FOR DIGESTER GAS SULFIDE REDUCTION - Pd-141 Item 5 PIPE REALIGNMENT, FCO 5 Contractor was directed to realign a drain pipe to avoid obstructions not indicated on plans for a lump sum amount of $5,176.00. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM S 5,176.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 6 FILTER CHANGE, FCO 6 Contractor was directed to install eight filters to replace the eight filters specified for a lump sum amount of $14,500.00. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 14,500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days t� Item 7 FILTER CREDIT, FCO 7 Contractor issued credit for specified, unused filters for the lump sum credit of $[1,600.00]. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ [1,600.00] TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 8 RELOCATION OF GUARDRAIL, FCO 8 Contractor was directed to relocate guardrail to avoid conflict with building for the lump sum amount of $250.00. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 250.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days Item 9 EARLY COMPLETION BONUS Contractor completed the operational completion requirements of Section 5 on June 6, 1985 and is eligible for a bonus of $1000.00 per day for 3 days. 3 days @ $1000.00 = $3000.00. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 3,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM 0 Calendar Days "G-2" -AGENDA ITEM 4111(D) - ALL. DISTRICTS "G-2" bV V1 • • � � . P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844+ELLIS AVENUEVy FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0. NO. One ( 1) CONTRACTOR: FRASER CORPORATION OATE June 20, 1985 JOB: FERROUS CHLORIDE SYSTEM FOR DIGESTER GAS SULFIDE REDUCTION - JOB NO. PW-141 Amount of this Change Order (Add) ) S 25,097.80 The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. I is , therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this chana_e order, and no direct or indirect , incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or ,..,,will be incurred by Contractor. SUMIARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date April 5, 1985 Original Contract Time 100 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 13, 1985 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time No Change Revised Completion Date No Change Original Contract Price $ 376,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes S 0.00 This Change (Add) ( S 25,097.80 Amended Contract Price S 401 ,097.80 Board Authorization Date: July 10, 198 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CoWac or Deputy Chief Engineer "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(D) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 1- P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT 110. N/A C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE June 20, 1985 JOB: REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY SEDIMENTATON BASINS "F" AND "G" AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-5R-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) Ohmineft) $ 3.374.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 STAINLESS STEEL KNIFE GATE VALVES - FCO 1 Contractor was directed to install six (6)-10 inch knife gate valves in lieu of the 8 inch valves specified for a lump sum amount of S3,374.00. TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER S 3,374.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this charge order can be perfcrned incidental to the prise work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. S;IMMRV OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Daze October 30, 1984 Original Contract Tire 360 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 24, 1985 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time No Change Revised Completion Date No Change Original Contract Price S 783.464.00 Prev. Auth. Changes S (12.192.96) This Change (Add) (Deduct) S 3,374.00 Amended Contract Price 5 774,645.04 Board Authorization Date: July 10, 1985 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOR, IA G1,6 By nw v.Zj o t to eputy h er Engineer "H" AGENDA ITEM #11(E) - ALL DISTRICTS "H" • June 25, 1985 11:00 a.m. B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T CONTRACT NO. R-018 PROJECT TITLE REHABILITATION OF NO. 1 TRICKLING FILTER - PLANT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION REHABILITATION OF NO. 1 TRICKLING FILTER AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $49,210.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $ CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. , Signal Hill, CA $29,620.00 2. DEIST-BINSFIELD, INC. , iaguna Niguel, CA $48,904.00 3. SPIESS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. , Santa Maria, CA $61,080.00 V 4. CREOLE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC., Houston, TX $61,340.00 5. ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. , Upland, CA $82,000.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in the bid amount of $29,620.00 as the lowest and best bid. �� >�J��� Llillian N. CTarke, Sr. Superintendent v MNC/nb "I" AGENDA ITEM #11(F) - ALL DISTRICTS "I„ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIB. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)540.2910 17141962 2411 June 21, 1985 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Architectural Services for Job No. J-7-4, Administration Building Addition at Plant No. 1 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional architectural services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Pulaski and Arita Architects for the design of Job No. J-7-4, Administration Building Addition at Plant No. 1, on an hourly-rate basis including actual salary, overhead and profit, plus direct job expense, in an amount not to exceed $168,500.00 per the following breakdown. Phase I: Preliminary Design $ 50,500.00 Phase II: Preparation of Contract Documents and Specifications 80,000.00 Phase III: Construction Services 33,000.00 Direct Job Expense: 5,000.00 Fixed Profit: Included TOTAL CONTRACT, NOT TO EXCEED $168,500.00 "J-1° AGENDA ITEM #11(G) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Boards of Directors Po BOX 8127 June 21, 1985 FOUNTAN V"UY.CAUF IA 92728.8127 Page Two tO EWSAVENUE �►T FOUNTAIN VALLEY.0 IFOPNIA92708-7018 91415C6 910 01419622411 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Richard B. Ed ar /s/Don R. Griffin Tchard B. dgar, oint Chairman on R. Griffin, Vice Joint hairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Norman Culver /s/Richard Partin Orman Culver, Chairman Richard Partin Building Committee Building Committee Selection Committee Selection Committee �..� /s/James Neal /s/Thomas M. Dawes ames eal Thomas M. Dawes Building Committee Deputy Chief Engineer Selection Committee Selection Committee ja "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(G) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2" RESOLUTION NO. 85-106 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH PULASKI AND ARITA, ARCHITECTS INCORPORATED, FOR DESIGN OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH PULASKI AND ARITA, ARCHITECTS INCORPORATED, FOR DESIGN OF ADMINISTRA- TION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4 x r x x x x x r r r r r r r r r r WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 7, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Pulaski and Arita, Architects Incorporated, for design of Ad:inistration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4; and, V WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said urocedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated July 10, 1985, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Crange County and Pulaski and Arita, Architects Incorporated, for design of Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That Payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: �d "K-1" -AGENDA ITEM #11(G) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" Engineering Services (hourly rates including actual salary, overhead and profit, not to exceed: PHASE I: Preliminary Design $ 50,500 PHASE II: Preparation of Contract Documents 6 Specifications 80,000 PHASE III: Construction Services 33,000 $163,500 Direct Job Expenses, not to exceed $ 5,000 TOTAL, NOT TO EXCEED. . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . .. $168,500 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. L.✓ "K-2" -AGENDA ITEM #11(G) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS f AREA CODE714 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA a�� s .40- 910 P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE(EUCLID OFF-RAMP.SAN OIEGO FREEWAY) June 21, 1985 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Value Design/Engineering Services RE Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scruhber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34; and Scheduling Coordination with other Associated Rehabilitation Projects In accordance with the District 's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Engineering Science for value design/engineering services for Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34; and Scheduling Coordination with other associated rehabilitation projects, on an hourly labor rate plus direct cost basis in an amount not to exceed $102,100 per the following cost breakdown: Task 1 Scheduling Hourly Rates, not to exceed $ 43,000 Direct Costs, not to exceed 2,000 Subtotal , Task 1 $ 45,000 Task 2 Value Design Hourly Rates, not to exceed $55,400 Direct Costs, not to exceed 1,700 Subtotal , Task 2 $ 57,100 TOTAL COST, NOT TO EXCEED $102,100 "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #11( i) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS al ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFONNIA Boards of Directors 2O.WXa127 June 21, 1985 FO WWNVAu ,CAIFOAMA W72a-8127 1N,✓ Page Two 1o9AA EW9 AVENUE PoUWMN VALLEY.MUFOANIA 921OB-M16 91A)a n10 914) a 2CI The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Richard B. Ed ar /s/Don R. Griffin Richard B. dgar, oint Chairman on R. Griffin, Vice oint hairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer Selection Committee ja e.� "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #h(H) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" RESOLUTION NO. 85-107 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ENGINEERING-SCIENCE FOR VALUE DESIGN/ENGINEERING SERVICES RE JOBS NOS. P1-25, P1-26, P2-32, P2-33 AND P2-34 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ENGINEERING-SCIENCE FOR VALUE DESIGN/ENGINEERING SERVICES RE JOBS NOS. P1-25, P1-26, P2-32, P2-33 AND P2-34 ♦ • • w w + w w w w w w w w w w w WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services-, and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Engineering-Science for value design/engineering services re Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, U Job No. P2-32, Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P2-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated July 10, 1985, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County and Engineering-Science for value design/engineering services re Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job "P1-1" -AGENDA ITEM t1l(H) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-1" No. P2-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and ?mprovements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Engineering Services (hourly rates including overhead and profit, not to exceed: (TASK 1) $ 43,000 (TASK 2) 55,400 $ 98,400 Direct Costs, not to exceed: (TASK 1) $ 2,000 (TASK 2) 1,700 $ 3,700 TOTAL, NOT TO EXCEED. . . . . . . . $102,100 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #,11(H) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-2" RESOLUTION NO. 85-108 APPROVING LICENSE AGREEMENTS WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION LICENSE AND LICENSE AGREEMENT TO OCCUPY RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN ITS GREEN ACRES PIPELINE UNDER DISTRICTS' INTERPLANT SEWERS ADJACENT TO THE SANTA ANA RIVER BETWEEN PLANT NO. 1 AND PLANT NO. 2 ♦ s e • x ♦ t • t e e • + • + The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Temporary Construction License dated June 19, 1985, and the License Agreement dated June 19, 1985, by and between the Orange County Water District (Licensee) and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County V (Licensor) , wherein Licensor grants to Licensee the right to occupy right-of-way to construct and maintain its Green Acres Pipeline under Districts' interplant sewers adjacent to the Santa Ana River between Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 in the vicinities of Garfield Avenue and Adams Street, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That said Licenses shall be granted at no cost to the Licensee; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Temporary Construction License and permanent License Agreement on behalf of itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. „NI, AGENDA ITEM #11( f) - ALL DISTRICTS "N" RESOLUTION NO. 85-120-1 CREATING COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND A .RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, CREATING A FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND FOR ACCOUNTING FOR CONNECTION FEE REVENUES f f f i f f i f f f f ♦ ♦ WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 has heretofore duly adopted Ordinance No. 105, amending Ordinance No. 104, establishing connection fees for connection to the .sewerage systems within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That there is hereby established the Facilities Revolving Fund of County Sanitation District No. 1; and, Section 2. ' That all connection fees, as established by Ordinance No. 105, and as amended from time to time, when collected, shall be deposited in said fund; and, Section 3. That said fund shall be used only for the aquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of sewerage facilities and other purposes described in Section 5474.9 of the California Health and Safety Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. "0" AGENDA ITEM #110) - DISTRICT 1 110" ODUNPY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE ODUNTY P. O. EOX 8127 - 10844 EILTC AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 � CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 1 ODNIRACMR: Subgrade Construction Company DATE June 17, 1985 JOB: Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station - Contract No. 2-24 Amount of this Change Order (A34) (Deduct) $(2,843.88) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. location/Work Needed Calendar Days Extension Amount 1. 'The contractor has directed to remove and dispose of AC paving not shown on contract documents. Oasts are allowed in accordance with District field change order and Contractor's extra Fork request dated January 9, 1985 and Section 10-6 of the General `„i Provisions, for the lunp sum amount of . . . 10 $ 867.65 2. The contractor is allowed costs for breaking and removing rock formation not shown on the plan. Costs are allowed in accordance with District field change order and Oontractor's extra Fork request number 2 dated December 11, 1984 and Section 10-6 of the General Provisions, for the limp sum amount of . . . 15 2,037.81 3. The Contractor was required to install two additional 450 fittings and thrust blocks to be able to bring pipe to manhole at higher elevation. Costs are allowed in accordance with District field change order and Contractor's extra Fork request number 3 dated December 13, 1984 and Section 10-6 of the General Provisions, for the lump sum amount of . . . 2 450.66 V "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(K) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "P-1" COUNM SANITATMN DISMIChi OF ORANGE COUNM Page 2 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ffi.LIS AVENUE EOUNPAIN VALLEY, alliFORNIA 92708 OiAN3E ORDER C. 0. NO. 1 CONMACMR: Shbgrade Construction Company DATE June 17, 1985 JOB: Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pmup Station - Contract No. 2-24 Calendar Days iocation/Wark Needed Extension Amount 4. Tne contractor was directed to slurry approximately 3,300 square feet of roadway in front of the new pimp station. Costs are allowed in accordance with District field change order and Contractor's extra work request number 4 dated June 13, 1985 and Section 10-6 of the General Provisions, for the lug sum amount of . . . 1 550.00 5. Contractor is allowed a tine extension for `..' (a) Incleuueht weather of 26 days less 10 days included in contract 16 (b) Delay in delivery of equipment 38 6. 'fie contractor finished the work on June 21, 1985. With this 82-calendar day extension, the revised completion date is May 25, 1985. The contractor is charged liquidated damages for 27 days at $250 per day. 70TAL rrE S NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 82 (2,843.88) The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract plus the 82 days time extension granted hereby. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no tine extension other than the 82 days approved herein is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by contractor. 11P-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(K) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "P-2" COUNTY SANrnUMN DISTRIM OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 Fix AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIL•UR m 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 1 CONMRACIOR: Subgrade Construction Company GATE June 17, 1985 JOB: Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station - Contract No. 2-24 SUMMARY OF OJNMCr TINE Original Contract Date September 6, 1984 Original Contract Time 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date March 4, 1985 Time Extension this C.O. 82 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 82 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 262 Calendar Days Revised Oompletion Date May 25, 1985 Original Contract Price $ 138,630.80 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add•) (Deduct) $ (2,843.88) Amended Contract Price $ 135,786.92 Board authorization date: July 10, 1985 Approved: COUNTY SANrrATIDN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIMRNIA BY BY, Contractor Deputy Chief Engineer „P-3" - -AGENDA ITEM #11(K) (1) - .DISTRICT 2 "P-3" RESOLUTION NO. 85-121-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-24 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING MODIFICATIONS TO CARBON CANYON DAM PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 2-24, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That, except as set forth in Section 5 hereof, the contractor, Subgrade Construction Corporation, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, on June 21, 1985; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, except as set forth in Section 5 hereof, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated September 6, 1984; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,- Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Subgrade Construction Corporation setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, and assessing the contractor for liquidated damages for 27 days from Nay 26, 1985, the conceptual completion date, to June 21, 1985, the actual date of completion of work by the contractor, in the amount of $250.00 per day, for the total V-1" -AGENDA ITEM #11(K) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "D-]" amount of $6,750.00, as provided in the plans and specifications for said contract, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel, and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. "9-2" -AGENDA ITEM #11(K) (2) - DISTRICT 2 110-2n COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA .•tea Y F.O. 80X 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9 2 708-701 8 I 17141540-2910 P141962 2411 June 24, 1985 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum to Engineering Services Contract for Fullerton-Brea (Purchase) Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-25 `�✓ In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated Addendum No. 1 in the lump sum amount of $62,601 with Lowry and Associates for the design of the Fullerton-Brea (Purchase) Relief Trunk project, Contract 2-25, calculated as follows: Traffic Detour and Traffic Control Plans $24,889.00 Relocation and Redesign of Project between Berkeley Avenue and Brea Boulevard 29,540.00 Revise Project from two Construction Contracts to a Single Contract 4,000.00 Abandonment and/or disposition of Existing Fullerton-Brea (Purchase) Relief Trunk 4,172.00 TOTAL ADDENDUM, Lump Sum Amount $62,601.00 "R-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(L) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "R-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS•' of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Boards of Directors P.O.BOX$127 June 24, 1985 F TaN VALL .CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 Page Two UN 0%$4ELL19AVENUE 9 FOTAIN VALLEY.CALIFOMNIA 92M8.7dW C14184P 10 a141882-2411 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/Richard E. Buck Catlin, Chairman Richard E. Buck, Vice Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer Selection Committee V ja "R-211 AGENDA ITEM #11(L) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "R-2" RESOLUTION NO. 85-122-2 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF CONTRACT NO. 2-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF THE FULLERTON-BREA RELIEF TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-25 WHEREAS, the District has heretofore entered into an agreement with Lowry and Associates for engineering services in connection with design of the Fullerton-Brea Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-25; and, WHEREAS, the City of Fullerton and the Districts' staff agree that the alignment of the Fullerton-Brea Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-25, should be changed to stay within Harbor Boulevard between Berkeley Avenue and Valley View Drive and be placed in Hillcrest Park between Valley View Drive and Brea Boulevard; and, WHEREAS, the City of Fullerton has requested that the traffic detour plans be included in the plans and specifications following approval by the City, and, WHEREAS, the Districts' staff has requested that the engineer consolidate what was proposed to be two projects into one major construction project; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with Lowry and Associates to provide for said design modifications to accommodate realignment of the sewer at considerable savings in estimated construction costs and for other miscellaneous revisions; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on June 12, 1985, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services, in accordance with established procedures. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(L) (2) - DISTRICT 2 DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated July 10, 1985, to that certain agreement dated June 8, 1983, by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 and Lowry and Associates for design of the Fullerton-Brea Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-25, to provide for design modifications to accommodate realignment of the sewer and for other miscellaneous revisions to the plans and specifications, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by a lump sum fee of $62,601.00, increasing the total amount from a lump am fee of $270,000 plus outside services, on a per diem fee basis, as follows: Soils Surveys Not to exceed $30,000 Construction Staking Not to exceed $30,000 to a lump sum fee not to exceed $392,601.00 plus said outside services; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby V authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. "S-2" MEMDA ITEM #11(L) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "S-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA v P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALFORNIA 92709-7018 (714)540-2910 (7141 962 2411 June 28, 1985 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services for Contract No. 3-28R-1, Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engi- neering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for the design of Contract No. 3-28R-1, Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, on an hourly-rate basis including overhead, plus profit and out-of-pocket expense, in an amount not to exceed $$39,610.00, per the following breakdown. Labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 95%, not to exceed $35;100.00 Out-of-Pocket Expense, not to exceed 1,000.00 Profit at 10% 3,510.00 Total Contract Cost, Not To Exceed $39,610.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Don Roth /s/Carrey Nelson on oth Carrey els0n Chairman Vice Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Is/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer Selection Committee ja "T" AGENDA ITEM #11(m) (1) - DISTRICT 3 "T" RESOLUTION NO. 84-123-3 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CLIFFORD A. FORKERT, CIVIL ENGINEER, FOR DESIGN OF CONTRACT NO. 3-28R-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTOR OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CLIFFORD A. FORKERT, CIVIL ENGINEER, FOR DESIGN OF MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE (VAULT) REHABILITATION AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 3-28R-1 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing proce- dures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for design of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1; and, V WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated July 10, 1985, by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 and Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for design of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: �a✓ "U-1" AGENDA ITEM f1l(M) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "U-1" Engineering Services, (hourly rates plus overhead at 95%) . not to exceed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $35,100.00 Out-of-Pocket Expenses, not to exceed. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000.00 Profit at 10%. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,510.00 TOTAL, not to exceed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $39,610.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(M) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "U-2" RESOLUTION NO. 85-124-3 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-28R AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE HOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING REHABILITATION OF 19 MANHOLES ON THE MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-28R AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Mike Prlich and Sons, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R on June 15, 1985; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated July 2, 1984; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Mike Prlich and Sons setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. S.d PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. IV" AGEPIDA ITEM #11(N) - DISTRICT 3 "V" RESOLUTION NO. 85-125 `.►' AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 5-19-R2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF "B' TRUNK SEWER, EAST OF SANTA ANA RIVER JUNCTION STRUCTURE TO BITTER POINT PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-19-R2 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to John T. Malloy and John T. Malloy, Inc. , a Joint Venture for Replacement of Portions of "B" Trunk Sewer, East of Santa Ana River Junction Structure to Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-19-R2, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for Replacement of Portions of "B" Trunk Sewer, East of Santa Ana River Junction Structure to Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-19-R2, be awarded to John T. Malloy and John T. Malloy, Inc. , a Joint Venture, in the total amount of $420,710.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 5, acting for itself and as agent for District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. "W-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(P) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "W-1" COUNTY SAWATION OI$TRICTS . At ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA NO ADDENDUM PO aaa 9127 June 25, 1985 - 11.00 A.M. FOUNTAIN VALLEY CALIFORNIA R2729a•,27 IWAA ELLS AVENUE B I D T A B U L A T I O N WUNTAIN VALLEY.MIFORNIA 827C8 MAI 5Q-2910 n,m%2zA,1 CONTRACT NO. 5-19-R2 PROJECT TITLE Replacement of Portion of "B" Trunk Sewer from Santa Ana River Structure to Bitter Dint um2 Stat on PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construct sewer from Santa Ana River to pump Station in City of Newport Beach, north of PCH BUDGET $468,000 - Dist. 5 ENGINEER 'S ESTIMATE $ 532,190 AMOUNT $133,000 - Dist. 6 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1 JOHN T. MALLOY AND JOHN T. MALLOY, INC. , $ 420,710.00 a JOINT VENTURE, Los Angeles, CA 2. MIKE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO., Temple City, CA 425, 387.00 3. STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO., Reseda, CA 452,813.00 4. CK PUMP & DEWATERING CORP. , Signal Hill , CA 498,453.00 5. VICCO CONSTRUCTION, LaVerne, CA 504,432.00 6. THIBODO CONSTRUCTION, Vista, CA 515,572.00 7. MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION, Sunland, CA 519,123.00 8. PETER C. DAVID CO., Garden Grove, CA 553,474.00 9. ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC. , Rancho Cucamonga, CA 744,844.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to John T. Malloy, and John T. Malloy, Inc. , a Joint Venture in the Zolmas amount o �20,710.00 as V the lowest and best bid. M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer TMD:,j a "W-221 -AGENDA ITEM 911(P) - DISTRICTS 5 £ 6 "II-2" RESOLUTION NO. 85-126-7 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 7-2C-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MAIN STREET TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-2C-4 x + x w + w w x x x x w x The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 7 of Orange County California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Steve Bubalo Construction Company for construction of Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for construction of Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4, be awarded to Steve Bubalo Construction Company in the total amount of $2,240,920.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. "X-1" -AGENDA ITEM €!11(0) (2) - DISTRICT 7 11X-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS' 91 ORANGE COUNTY. CAUPORNIL ONE ADDENDUM 10 90.8tV June 25, 1985 - 11:00 a.m. FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAV001,NIA 92725:--7 IOW ELUS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEC CALIFORNIA 327W B I D T A B U L A T I O N n Al 952.2<T, S H E E T CONTRACT NO. 7-2C-4 PROJECT TITLE Main Street Trunk Sewer PROJECT DESCRIPTION Install sewer in Main Street from Peters Canyon Wash to Von Karman in the City of Irvine ENGINEER 'S ESTIMATE $ 2,540,000 BUDGET AMOUNT $ 2,700,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO., Reseda, CA $2,240,920.00 2. K.E.C. COMPANY, Corona, CA S2, 349,000.00 Ld 3. ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. , Upland, CA $2,725,000.00 4. I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Steve Bubalo Construction Company in the bid amount of $2,240,920.00 as the lowest and best bid. c) a)IF Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer V TMD:ja "X-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) (2) - DISTRICT 7 FFX 2'F RESOLUTION NO. 85-127-13 v CREATING COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OPERATING FUND, ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND AND FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN OPERATING FUND, ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND AND FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND FOR ACCOUNTING FOR CONNECTION AND USE FEE REVENUES WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 has heretofore duly adopted Ordinance No. 1301, establishing fees for connection and use of the District's sewerage system. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER. Section 1. That there is hereby established the Operating Fund, Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund and Facilities Revolving Fund of County Sanitation District No. 13; and, Section 2. That said funds shall be used only for the purposes described in Sections 5471 et seq. and 5474 et seq. of the California Health and Safety Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. "Y" AGENDA ITEM 911 M - DISTRICT 13 "Y" RESOLUTION NO. 85- ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 ka./ OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.—OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE x x x x x x x x x x x x x x WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as proposed by the initiative Measure approved by the people at the special statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise specifically provided for in said Article; and, WHEREAS, the State Legislature added Division 9 (commencing with Section 7900) to Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California to implement Article XIII B of the California Constitution; and, WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at a regularly-scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting and that fifteen (15) days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit shall be available to the public; and, WHEREAS, Section 7902 (a) of the Government Code sets forth the method for determining the appropriations limit for each local jurisdiction for the 1985-86 fiscal year; and, �a✓ "Z-1" AGENDA ITEM 91-15 - ALL DISTRICTS "Z-1" WHEREAS, THE Board of Directors wish to establish the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1985-86 for the District. V NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1: That it is hereby found and determined that the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, for fiscal year 1985-86, was available to the public in the Finance Department of said District at Least fifteen (15) days prior to this date. Section 2: That the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1985-86 for County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, as established in accordance with Section 7902(a) of the California Government Code is $ which sum is within the maximum authorized spending limitation for fiscal year 1985-86. Section 3: The determination of the appropriation limit is based upon the best and most complete information available at this time. The District reserves the right to review and re-establish a new and different limit in the event that it subsequently determines that a modification of the limitation amount is appropriate. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, . 1985. "Z-2" AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "Z-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA E.P.. P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10044 ELLK%FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)640-2910 (714)982-2411 July 3, 1985 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services to Conduct Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall for Contract Period Number 1 in Accordance with Specification No. S-032, and Addendum No. 1 Thereto In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selecting professional V engineering/architectual services, the Selection Committee has negotiated with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for conducting ocean monitoring contract services for Contract Period Number 1. As shown in Attachment 1, Contract Period Number 1 consists of ocean monitoring from August, 1985 through June, 1986, data management and interpretation continuing beyond June 30, 1986, and an annual report that must be submitted to EPA and the RWQCB by January 30, 1987. The negotiated cost, including all professional services, direct expenses, equipment, overhead, and profit is the lump sum amount of $917,680. A total of seven proposals were received and evaluated by staff. One proposal received was in a lesser amount, however, after extensive evaluation of that proposal and full and due consideration of that firm's capabilities, it has been determined non-responsive to the Districts' Request for Proposals for this work. The Selection Committee hereby certifies that SAIC was, therefore, the lowest responsive bid and was also the best in terms of overall technical approach and ability to manage the project. The cost is reasonable and will not result in excessive profits for SAIC. The Selection Committee wishes to advise the Boards that it is necessary to award the contract at this time in order that the work can commence immediately, with the full understanding that three elements of the monitoring program (listed in Attachment 2) have yet to be defined by the Environmental Protection Agency. This is a result of the EPA insisting that mobilization of the Ea,J "AA-1" AGENDA ITEM #18(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "AA-1" Boards of Directors July 3, 1985 Page 2 monitoring program commence even though they have not provided adequate guidance documentation. As these elements are defined, and as the unprecedented scope of work provided for in this first-of-a-kind effort is further refined by EPA, it will be necessary to amend the contract to provide for the changes that will be required. The Selection Committee will be prepared to negotiate appropriate change orders to the contract for submittal to the Joint Boards for their review and approval. /s/Richard B. Edgar /s/Don R. Griffin Richard B. Edgar Don R. Griffin Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Member Selection Committee Member /s/Blake P. Anderson Blake P. Anderson Director of Operations Selection Committee Member "AA-2" -AGENDA ITEM #18(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "AA-2" 6/27/85 ATTACHMENT 1 OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR DISTRICTS' 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL CONTRACT PERIOD NO. 1 Month # 1 July 85 Begin monitoring year #1 2 Aug 85 Begin boat work 3 Sep 85 100% mobilized 4 'Oct 85 Quarterly meeting 5 Nov 85 6 Dec 85 7 Jan 86 Deploy current meters Quarterly meeting 8 Feb 86 v 9 Mar 86 10 Apr 86 Quarterly meeting 11 May 86 12 June 86 End monitoring year #1 13 July 86 Quarterly meeting 14 Aug 86 15 Sept 86 16 Oct 86 Data submission Quarterly meeting 17 Nov 86 18 Dec 86 19 Jan 87 Annual report Quarterly meeting 11AA-3" AbENDA ITEM #18(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "AA-3" �• 6/27/85 ATTACHMENT 2 OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR DISTRICTS' 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS OF PERMIT ELEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Influent monitoring Districts Effluent monitoring Districts Shore station monitoring Districts Water quality monitoring Contractor Ocean currents Contractor Benthic monitoring Contractor Trawling Contractor v Rig fishing Contractor Mussel assessment To be specified Anchovy study Pending Asbestos study Pending Data analysis Districts/Contractor Data summary and interpretation Districts/Contractor "AA-4" AGENDA ITEM #18(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "AA-4" RESOLUTION NO. 85-118 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR CSDOC 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-032 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS .OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-032 * • f # t # * i i # * f * * k f k k # WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectursal services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with Science Applications International Corporation ("SAIC") for Ocean Monitoring kftj Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures has negotiated and certified a fee for said services in accordance with established procedures. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, and Science Applications International Corporation for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, is hereby approved and accepted; "BB-1" AGENDA ITEM #18(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "BB-1" and, Section 2. That the Districts have received a proposal in a lesser amount \.d than that of the proposed award and have given full and due consideration to the capabilities of said firm to perform the work required for this project. The Districts have determined that the lowest proposal, by Jacobs Environmental, is by a firm with inadequate capability of staff, equipment and facilities to perform the job required for the specifications established by the Districts and is, therefore, not responsive to the Districts' Request for Proposals for said work; and, Section 3. That payment for said Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, for the lump sum of $917,680.00; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. Section 5. That the proposal submitted by Jacobs Environmental and all other proposals for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 10, 1985. "BB-2" AGENDA ITEM #18(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "BB-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 12 21 3, 5, 6, 72 11, AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JUNE 12, 1935 P�iTATIOV bt N 'riee 195A GE COVE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ell. AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA .r ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, was held on June 12, 1985, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Pollowing the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll .as called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 as follows: ACTIVE DIPHCrOPS ALTE191AT8 DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank z Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman pro ten Donald J. Saltarelll m Dan Driest Robert Luxembourger a Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder _ DIST Cr NO. 2: x Buck Catlin, Chairman _Chris Norby x Richard Buck, Chairman pro tem _George Ziegler x Sam Cooper _Carrey Nelson x Dan Griaet Robert Luxembourger -7—Carol Eawanami _Nayne Silael x William D. Mahoney _Dorothy Model Jame, Neal x George Scott =Bob Perry Norman Culver x Don Roth _B. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. x Don Smith Gene Beyer a Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder _Gene Wisner _x_Michael J. Beverage DISTRICT NO. 3: : Dun Roth, Chairman —ff. Llewellyn Overholt =Caney Nelson, Chairman pro rem _Sam Cooper x Ruth Bailey _John Thomas x Osuar Brownell _Joyce Risser x Buck Catlin _Chris Norby x Norman Culver Bob Perry =Don Griffin James T. Jarrell x Dan Driest _Robert Luxembourger x William 0. Mahoney _Dorothy Wedel James Real =George Scott x Richard Olson _Bruce Pinlayson x Richard Partin _John Easel i R ichud Polls Nocma Seidel =Sal Sapien _Jean Siriani a Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder x Charles Sylvia Anthony Selvaggi DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman _John Cox, Jr. s Philip Maurer, Chairn pro rem John Co., Jr. a Roger Stanton maHarriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 6: x James me Wapner, Chairman —Jams B. Gallacher x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem John Cox, Jr. a Roger Stanton _Sarriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don Smith, Chairman Gene Beyer _ x David Sills, Chairman pro Gem _Sally Anne Miller x Richard Edgar _Donald J. Saltarelli x Dan Grlset Robert Luxembourger x Philip Maurer _Jahn Cox, Jr. a Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder x James Wapner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Ruth Bailey, Chairman _Robert P. Mandic, Jr. a Roger Stanton, Chairman pro tem _Harriett Wieder x John Thomas _Ruth Finley DISTRICT NO. 13: x Don Smith, Chairman _Gene Beyer x Sam Cooper, Chairman pro tem —Gene Nelson x Michael J. Beverage _Gene Wisner x Don Roth —Harriet Llewellyn Overholt a Roger Stanton Harriet Wieder -2- 6/12/85 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Blake Anderson, Bill Butler, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Richard von Langan, Chuck Winsor, Gary Streed, Corinne Clawson OTHERS PRESENT: Suzanne Atkins, General Counsel, Conrad Hohener, Walt Howard, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, Bill Knopf, Kris Lindstrom, Sandra Bauer, Mrs. Richard B. Edgar, Andy Illich, Mike Ratcliff, Sobhan Basu, Tony Rezzuti, Gus Vazquez, Don Heinbuck, Darryl Miller, Ron Young x x x x + x x x x x x x x DISTRICTS 1 6 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and accept resigna- tion of Mayor Frank Greinke of the That the letter from Mayor Frank Greinke City of Tustin of the City of Tustin resigning from the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 7 be received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be seated as members of the Boards: District Active Director Alternate Director 1 Ronald B. Hoesterey Don Saltarelli v 7 Richard B. Edgar Don Saltarelli DISTRICT 1 'There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1985 or the adjourned meeting held May 29, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -3- 6/12/85 DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. `.� DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. i DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to theminutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1985, or the adjourned meeting held May 30, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Edgar reported that at Report of the Joint Chairman its annual conference in May, the California Water Pollution Control Association had presented awards of excellence and certificates to three Orange County industries. The firms, nominated by the Districts' Industrial Waste Division inspectors, were recognized for their efforts over the past year to be in consistent compliance with their discharge requirements, for development of technological advances in controlling industrial wastewater, and for development of public awareness for the need to control industrial wastewater and provide protection of the environment. The purpose of the award is to stimulate interest on the part of industry in taking positive steps to meet current water pollution control standards. Chairman Edgar then recognized Tony Rezutti and Gus Vasquez representing Western Wheel Manufacturing in La Palma, recipient of a certificate, and Andy Illich and Mike Ratcliff, representatives of Lamination Technology in Santa Ana, who received the Small Plant of the Year award for the Southern California region. He also acknowledged Bill Hooper and Bill Lakin of BPS Technologies in Santa Ana, who received a certificate but were unable to be at the Board meeting. Mr. Edgar commended these firms and expressed the Boards' appreciation for their efforts. The Joint Chairman reported on the Directors' Orientation which was held on Wednesday, May 29th, and lasted four hours. There was an excellent turnout of 23 active and alternate Directors. The staff gave a slide presentation of the Districts' facilities and various District activities and reviewed organizational and personnel matters, financing and budgeting and the Districts' facilities master plan programs. The orientation included a tour of Reclamation Plant No. 1 and the Laboratory. Chairman Edgar expressed his appreciation to all those Directors who attended and commended the staff for the program. Mr. Edgar then commented on the resolution adopted by the Boards in April urging adoption of BB 75 - Foran, relating to limitation of liability for public agencies. SB 75 would change the current law for joint and several liability to provide that public agencies would remain jointly and severally liable to a -4- 6/12/85 plaintiff without regard to a respective percentage of fault, but limited solely to the actual special damages incurred by the plaintiff, and would absolve the public agency of liability for payment of any general damages beyond their respective proportionate share of negligence. This would represent a fair and equitable allocation of legal responsibility in contrast to the current "deep pockets" concept. Chairman Edgar announced that SB 75 had passed the full State Senate and is scheduled to be heard in the Assembly Judiciary Committee on July 2nd. He reported that he had sent letters to each member of the Assembly Judiciary Committee on behalf of the Boards urging that they pass SB 75. Letters were also sent to members of Orange County's State Legislative Delegation urging that they contact the Assembly Judiciary Committee members in support of the Foran Bill. He urged the Directors to follow through and ask their respective agencies to communicate with the legislators in support of SB 75. The Joint Chairman then commented on the upcoming joint study session with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) to review the history and background information on the role of regional sewage service in the management and protection of the Santa Ana River underground water basin. He .announced that the proposed date for the adjourned joint meeting had been changed from June 20th to June 27th at 7.00 p.m. Chairman Edgar announced that Districts 5 and 6 were proposing to adjourn to June 25 at 4:15 p.m. for an update on their Master Plan and long-range financial program. The Joint Chairman also announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee would meet on Tuesday, June 18, at 4:30 p.m. and the Special Committee to Select an Architect for the Administration Building Addition (Building Committee) would meet on Thursday, June 20, at 5:30 p.m. The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, June 26, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Gene Wisner and Michael Beverage to attend and participate in the discussions. Chairman Edgar also reported that the staff would be meeting with ERO Systems relative to the contract for sludge reuse/disposal. He stated that if there were any significant developments on that matter, a meeting of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff would be called. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that Report of the General Manager updated Directors' Information Books had been provided to all Board members. He briefly reviewed the contents of the booklet. He also invited any Director that would like a tour of the Districts' facilities to contact the staff at any time. Mr. Sylvester reported on two proposed change orders relative to construction of _ the Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-1A, appearing on the Supplemental Agenda for District 2. He stated that a $5.1 million contract was awarded several months ago to build this trunk sewer in Euclid Avenue from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Edinger Avenue. The sewer is being placed in the westerly side of the divided road. Signs have been posted routing southbound traffic to the easterly side and prohibiting left turns. However, the signs are being ignored by motorists and 11 accidents have occurred. He reported that the Districts' staff, the contractor and the City of Fountain Valley met and discussed the issue at great length. The proposed change orders are a result of -5- 6/12/85 those meetings and to resolve these problems. Change Order No. 1 provides rerouting of all traffic to northbound only and Change Order No, 2 adds a provision to the contractor's agreement to speed up completion of the job. He recommended that these change orders be approved as they are in the best interests of the community and public safety. r,d ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the Authorizing the Fiscal Policy major portion of the Districts' excess Committee to place excess liability liability policy would expire June 30. insurance coverage effective Because of the tenuous condition in the July 1, 1985 insurance marketplace, the broker does not expect to receive new proposals until shortly before that deadline. Inasmuch as the Board does not meet again until July 10, staff suggested that this matter could either be placed on the adjourned regular meeting agenda for June 27, or the Fiscal Policy Committee could be authorized to place the coverage and the Joint Boards could then ratify or revise the Committee's action at the next regular meeting on July 10. Following a brief discussion it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Fiscal Policy Committee be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and to place appropriate excess liability insurance coverage effective July 1, 1985; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the actions taken by the Fiscal Policy Committee be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 10, 1985. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint �d and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A", "B" and "C" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 5 01 B5 5 15 85 5 29 85 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 804,877.01 $ 295,4B0.64 $ 258,430.49 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 662,592.20 598,618.05 524,922.42 Joint Working Capital Fund - 58,564.41 541,719.10 66,009.41 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 2,354.16 3,601.70 11,693.89 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 98.86 640.50 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 256,423.55 23,342.61 77,401.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 47,788.12 10,416.40 79,166.78 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 11,477.87 7,689.48 4,708.31 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 41.28 25.60 7.38 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 394,003.91 8,062.38 923,400.54 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 4,538.49 7,723.03 5,736.69 DISTRICT NO. 13 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 5,886.81 824.37 7,177.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 32.12 3,600.78 37.82 $2,248,579.93 $ 1,501,203.00 $1,g59,332.23 -6- 6/12/85 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing renewal of membership in the Association of Metropolitan That the renewal of membership in the Sewerage Agencies (AMSA's) Confer- Association of Metropolitan Sewerage ence of Coastal Agencies (CCA) Agencies (A6SA's) Conference of Coastal Agencies (CCA) for the period May 1, 1985 through April 30, 1986, be, and is hereby authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the payment of annual dues in the amount of $6,000.00 be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Specification No. P-079 to Vertex Business Interiors That the bid tabulation and recommendation re award of purchase of Office Panel System, Specification No. P-079, be, and is hereby, received and ' ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Vertex Business Interiors for the total amount of $40,395.64 including tax and installation. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Gerlich-Mitchell, That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Inc. (Specification No. E-164) to issue a purchase order to Gerlich-Mitchell, Inc. in the total amount of $44,790.00 plus tax and freight for Twelve (12) Belt Filter Press Horizontal Conversion Kits, (Specification No. E-164) for reduced belt wear and increased dewatering efficiency. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: `../ Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Transamerica That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Delaval, Inc. (Specification to issue a purchase order to No. R-017) Transamerica Delaval, Inc. in the total amount of $25,326.00 plus tax and freight to Remanufacture Six (6) Cylinder Heads on No. 1 Delaval Engine at Plant No. 1 (Specification No. R-017) . ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending the Boards' action of May 8, 1985, authorizing staff to That the Boards' action of May 8, 1985, issue a purchase order to authorizing staff to issue a purchase Disposable Waste Systems, Inc. order to Disposable Waste Systems, Inc. (Specification No. E-163) in the amount of $31,610.74 plus tax and freight for purchase of Replacement Parts for Six Sludge Grinders/Comminutors at Plants 1 and 2 (Specification No. E-163) , be, and is hereby, amended to provide for factory repair of the six sludge grinders/comminutors in lieu of purchasing the replacement parts, at a cost not to exceed $5,000.00 each, for a total reduced authorization not to exceed $30,000.00, to realize an estimated savings of 12% for Districts' repair labor. rd -7- 6/12/85 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 19145 issued to That Change Order A to Purchase Order Dorado Enterprises, Inc. re No. 19145 issued to Dorado Enterprises, Job No. PW-142 Inc, for installation of pumps, piping d✓ and appurtenances for the SARI/Sunflower Diversion Structure Modifications, Job No. PW-142, increasing the total amount from $15,721.00 to $16,536.15 for additional work relative to installation of a new bubbler-type sensing system and for delays resulting from a leaking slide gate at the Plant No. 1 Diversion Structure, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-142 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-82, accepting SARI/Sunflower Diversion Structure Modifications, Job No. PW-142, as complete and authorizing filing of a Notice of Completion. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. PW-141-A That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-83, approving plans and specifications for Purchase of Three (3) Hydrogen Sulfide Monitors re Ferrous Chloride System for Digester Gas Sulfide Reduction, Job No. PW-141-A' and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids upon approval of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving License Agreement with Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R. That the Boards of Directors hereby Peterson, a Partnership adopt Resolution No. 85-84, approving License Agreement with Jack R. Fenton and Wayne R. Peterson, a Partnership, to occupy Districts' right-of-way to operate and maintain a parking lot upon property located adjacent to the Santa Ana River, southerly of Hamilton Avenue, for a new five-year period from March 12, 1985 to March 12, 1990 with provision for a five-year extension, for an annual fee of $305.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. P2-5R-2 specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Basins F and G, Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2, authorizing additional costs for launder channel modifications and electrical modifications and deletion of the chlorine spray system from the perimeter of the basins, for a net deduction of $12,192.96 from the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. , be, and is hereby, approved. -8- 6/12/85 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Resolution No. 75-146, appointing representatives for the That the Boards of Directors hereby Districts to act as agents on their adopt Resolution No. 85-85, amending behalf in the Small Claims Court of Resolution No. 75-146, appointing the West Orange County Judicial representatives for the Districts to act District as agents on their behalf in the Small Claims Court of the West Orange County Judicial District, and rescinding all other resolutions amending said Resolution No. 75-146. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending the Board' s action of January 9, 1985, authorizing part,- That the Board's action of January 9, •_ cipation in a cooperative program 1985, authorizing participation in a with the County of Orange GSA and cooperative program with the County of Hazardous Materials Task Force to Orange GSA and Hazardous Materials Task develop, conduct and evaluate a Force to develop, conduct and evaluate a one-day trial "Toxics Roundup" one-day trial "Toxics Roundup" for collecting hazardous waste from households and small businesses, be, and is hereby, amended to increase the Districts' share of the cost of said trial program from $5,000.00 to $29,860.59; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment to the County of Orange in the amount of $28,411.52 for reimbursement of Districts' share of out-of-pocket expenses paid by the County, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: u Receive and file letter from the County of Orange GSA and Hazardous That the letter from the County of Materials Task Force re a second Orange GSA and Hazardous Materials Task "Toxics Roundup" Force dated May 30, 1985 requesting that the Districts co-sponsor a second "Toxics Roundup" in the Anaheim area, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing participation with the County of Orange GSA and Hazardous That participation with the County of Materials Task Force to develop, Orange GSA and Hazardous Materials Task conduct and evaluate a second Force to develop, conduct and evaluate a toxics roundup second toxics roundup for collecting hazardous wastes from households and small businesses, tentatively scheduled for July 13, 1985, be, and is hereby, authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment of one-half of the total cost, not to exceed $50,000.00 for the Districts' share, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim submitted by the attorney for That the claim submitted by the attorney Paul Hoff for Paul Hoff dated April 25, 1985, in `J the amount of $500,000.00 for injuries -9- 6/12/85 incurred by an employee of Shepherd Machinery Company while repairing a D8E Caterpillar Tractor allegedly belonging to the Districts, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim submitted by the attorney for That the claim submitted by the attorney California Casualty & Fire for California Casualty a Fire Insurance Insurance Company re Workers' Company, the Workers' Compensation Compensation benefits paid to carrier for Shepherd Machinery, in the Paul Hoff amount of $7,433.05 for workers' compensation benefits paid to Paul Hoff, an employee of Shepherd Machinery Company, as a result of injuries incurred while repairing a USK Caterpillar Tractor allegedly belonging to the Districts, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to Lease That the General Manager be, and is Agreement with East Bay Municipal hereby, authorized to execute Amendment Utility District re Specification No. 2 to Lease Agreement with East Bay No. L-012 Municipal Utility District for Lease of Districts' Cobey Composter (Specification No. L-012) not currently being used by the Districts, extending the term of said lease from May 31, 1985, to September 30, 1985, at the rate of $25.00 per operating hour with a minimum rental of $300 per month. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving continuation of agreement with the County of Orange for in- That the Boards of Directors hereby place density tests adopt Resolution No. 85-86, approving continuation of agreement with the County of Orange for in-place density tests to determine relative compaction of backfill for a five-year period beginning July 1, 1985. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report re Specification No. M-022 That the Staff Report dated June 3, 1985, re additional work required in connection with Emergency Repairs to Primary Junction Box A at Plant No. 2 (Specification No. M-022) be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 18834 issued to That Change Order A to Purchase Order Pascal and Ludwig Engineers No. 18834 issued to Pascal and Ludwig (Specification No. M-022) Engineers for Emergency Repairs to Primary Junction Box A at Plant No. 2 -10- 6/12/85 (Specification No. M-022) authorizing additional work to repair Primary Basin J and Sedimentation Basin K connector pipes, increasing the total amount from $71,710.00 to an amount not to exceed $138,558.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to solicit bids re Specification That the General Manager be, and is No. M-024 hereby, authorized to solicit bids for Rehabilitation of Connector Pipe for Sedimentation Basin E, Specification No. M-024, and to award a contract for said work in an amount not to exceed $60,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: _ Authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards That the General Manager be, and is and/or staff to attend and partici- hereby, authorized to designate members pate in meetings, hearings, of the Boards and/or staff to attend and conferences, facility inspections participate in meetings, hearings, and other functions conferences, facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts' policy and approved annual budget. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: v Approving Addendum No. 3 to the Engineering Services Agreement with That the Boards of Directors hereby John Carollo Engineers re Jobs adopt Resolution No. 85-87, approving Nos. P1-21, P2-28-1 and P2-28-2 Addendum No. 3 to the Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-21, Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant NO. 2, Job No. P2-28-1, and Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling Facilities, Job No. P2-28-2, allowing John Carollo Engineers to use outside services for structural design review and drafting, at no increase in the total authorized compensation of $874,374.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee John Carollo Engineers re Jobs certification of the final negotiated Nos. P1-22 and J-6-2 fee re Addendum No. 1 to Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Electrical Reliability at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-22, and Electrical Reliability at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -11- 6/12/85 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-88, approving Addendum No. 1 to Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Electrical Reliability at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-22, and Electrical Reliability at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2, providing for design changes necessitated by the approval of odor control plans to cover primary sedimentation basins and installation of an extensive new scrubber system and central power generation, on an hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead, plus profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $242,990.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $259,340.00 to an amount not to exceed $502,330.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that the Approving Engineering Services Selection Committee had interviewed two Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. firms, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. and re Jobs Nos. P1-25, P2-32, P1-26, Engineering-Science, for design of P2-33 and P2-34 primary basin covers and scrubber systems at Plants 1 and 2. He reported that the Selection Committee felt that either Malcolm Pirnie or Engineering-Science would do an excellent job. The Committee recommends the contract be awarded to Malcolm Pirnie because their cost was the lower of the two. However, the Committee also recommends that it be authorized to negotiate with Engineering-Science for value design/engineering for the project and services to coordinate the schedules for other associated rehabilitation projects. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee re Engineering Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for design of Covers for Primary d Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-89, approving Engineering Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for design of Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No, 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34; on an hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead plus direct expenses, soils investigation and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $649,668.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with That the Selection Committee be, and is Engineering-Science for value hereby, authorized to negotiate with design/engineering services re Engineering-Science for value Jobs Nos. P1-25, P2-32, P1-26, design/engineering services re Covers P2-33 and P2-34 for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at -12- 6/12/85 Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34; and scheduling coordination with other associated rehabilitation projects. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement with Michael Brandman That the Selection Committee Associates re preparation of an Certification re final negotiated fee re EIR on proposed Reorganization Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with Michael No. 79 - Formation of County Brandman Associates for preparation of Sanitation District No. 14 an Environmental Impact Report on _ proposed Reorganization No. 79 - Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, providing for additional services to prepare an Executive Summary, incorporate additional commentary pertinent to Irvine Ranch Water District needs, for procedural revisions and to respond to public commentary received on the Draft EIR, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-90, approving Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with Michael Brandman Associates for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on proposed Reorganization No. 79 - Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, providing for additional services to prepare an Executive Summary, incorporate additional commentary pertinent to Irvine Ranch Water District needs, for procedural revisions and to respond to public commentary received on the Draft EIR, on an hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead, plus direct costs and profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $15,460.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $30,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $45,460.00. A V certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by Annual nomination for Chairman the Boards at which nominations are to of the Joint Administrative be made for the office of Chairman of Organization the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary declared the nominations open. Directors Richard B. Edgar and Don R. Griffin were nominated as candidates for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. There being no further nominations, the Secretary reported that the election Would be held at the regular July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on May 22, 1985, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -13- 6/12/85 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Fiscal Policy Committee Report That the Fiscal Policy Committee's report and recommendations re 1985-86 personnel requirements and joint works budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving 1985-86 personnel requirements and amending That the 1985-86 personnel requirements Positions and Salaries Resolution be, and are hereby, approved as No. 79-20, as amended recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-91, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1985-86 personnel requirements. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Approving the 1985-86 Joint following roll call vote: Operating Budget AYES: Directors Ruth Bailey, Michael Beverage, Oscar Brownell, Richard Buck, Buck Catlin, Sam Cooper, Norm Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, Ronald 8, Hoesterey, Carol Rawanami, Bill Mahoney, Philip Maurer, Carrey Nelson, Richard Olson, Richard Partin, Bob Perry, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard Polis, Don Roth, Sal Sapien, George Scott, David Sills, Don E. Smith, Charles Sylvia, John Thomas, James Wahner. NOES: None ABSENT: Roger Stanton That the Joint Operating Budgets of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 for the 1985-86 fiscal year, be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows: Joint Operating/Working Capital Funds $26,775,000.00 Workers' Compensation Self-Insured Fund 582,000.00 Self-Funded Health Plan Trust Fund 659,000.00 Public Liability Self-Insured Fund 651,000.00 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Approving the 1985-86 Capital following roll call vote: Outlay Revolving Fund Budget AYES: Directors Ruth Bailey, Michael Beverage, Oscar Brownell, Richard Buck, Buck Catlin, Sam Cooper, Norm Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, Ronald B. Hoesterey, Carol Rawanami, Bill Mahoney, Philip Maurer, Carrey Nelson, Richard Olson, Richard Partin, Bob Perry, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard Polis, Don Roth, Sal Sapien, George Scott, David Sills, Don E. Smith, Charles Sylvia, John Thomas, James Wahner. -14- 6/12/85 NOES: None ABSENT: Roger Stanton That the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint Works Construction) of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of $34,088,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to evaluate a new selective dilution technology That staff be, and is hereby, authorized for internal combustion compliance to evaluate a new selective dilution with SCAQMD Rule 1110.1 technology for internal combustion (Specification No. M-025) compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1110.1 for a total cost not to exceed $92,548.00 (Specification No. M-025) . ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and That the Director of Finance be, and is forward to County Auditor for hereby, authorized to certify claims and payment forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1985, and declaring that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts until the 1985-86 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve staff 1� Summary Financial Report for the That the staff Summary Financial Report nine-month period ending for the nine-month period ending March March 31, 1985 31, 1985, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that this Public Hearing on Draft EIR for was the time and place fixed by the Proposed Formation of County Boards for a public hearing on the Draft Sanitation District No. 14 Environmental Impact Report for the formation of new County Sanitation District No. 14. Mr. Edgar reported that the purpose of this hearing was to receive public comments on the Draft EIR. Following the close of the hearing, the environmental consultant will be directed to address any oral public comments in the Final EIR that will come back to the Boards for consideration, tentatively, at the August meeting. He added that the record would be held open until June 27th for written public commentary. The consultant will also be directed to address all written comments received in the Final EIR. The Joint Chairman reported that copies of the Draft EIR were mailed to each of the cities within the Districts, the Sanitary Districts and the County of Orange and other appropriate agencies and interested parties. In all, the Draft SIR has been made available to 110 agencies and other parties. He also reported that, in addition, the staff personally contacted the Cities of Fountain Valley, -15- 6/12/85 Huntington Beach, Newport Beach and Costa Mesa, the cities adjacent to the treatment plants, and the City of Irvine, and offered to review the Draft EIR with their staffs. The environmental consultant and the Districts' staff met with the Cities of Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach and Irvine. Open Public Hearing The Chairman then declared the hearing open at 8:05 p.m. Report of General Counsel Chairman Edgar introduced Suzanne Atkins, an associate of the Districts' General Counsel, who reviewed a memorandum from the General Counsel pertaining to the procedural changes that were being recommended re formation of proposed District No. 14, and reported that the proceedings will be handled as a formation, rather than a reorganization as originally envisioned. Ms. Atkins then reviewed the procedure and approvals required in order to complete formation of proposed District No. 14. Receive and file General Counsel's It was then moved, seconded and duly Memorandum re District No. 14 carried: formation proceedings That the Memorandum from the General Counsel dated May 29, 1985 re the District No. 14 proceedings be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Report of environmental consultant, The Chair then recognized Sandra Michael Brandman 6 Associates Bauer, representing Michael Brandman 6 Associates, the Districts' environmental consultant, who addressed the Board giving an overview of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14. Ms. Bauer stated that the procedural change relative to formation of District No. 14 did not have a significant affect on the EIR. She then reported that in 1947 the Orange County Board of Supervisors commissioned a report to evaluate long-term wastewater service needs within the county. The study recommended a series of county sanitation districts to serve the north, west and central regions, and included within the recommended service boundaries was the area generally encompassed by the Irvine Ranch Water District, now proposed to be formed into District No. 14 consistent with the results and recommendations in that original study. Four physical improvements would be required in order to convey flaw from the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) service area to Reclamation Plant No. 1. Those improvements include the Main Street Trunk Sewer, Main Street Pump Station, Baker Street Force Main and the Fairview-Gisler Trunk Sewer. In addition, immediate treatment plant improvements are proposed to provide additional treatment and hydraulic capacity to accommodate the service area's growing population which includes upgrading of the Districts' headworks at Plant No. 1. It is anticipated that District No. 14 can participate in the 301(h) modified NPDES Permit either by becoming a part of the permit previously issued to the Districts or by applying for and receiving a separate permit. District No. 14 would not adversely affect the Districts' ability to meet the current ocean discharge requirements. -16- 6/12/85 Ms. Bauer reviewed the possible environmental impacts associated with the proposed construction and the measures that will be taken on all projects to mitigate the potential impacts. The Joint Chairman then recognized Eris Lindstrom of E. P. Lindstrom, Inc. , the Districts' environmental consultant that prepared the EIR for the Joint Works Wastewater Master Flan. He reported that he had worked with Michael Brandman 6 Associates to ensure that the same environmental impacts were addressed with regard to proposed District 14 as were addressed in the EIR for the Joint Works Wastewater Master Plan and reviewed some of the primary and secondary impacts. Mr. Lindstrom added that the same assumptions were used in both reports and included odor control measures, a new emergency generator system, source control, landscaping and water conservation measures. He also commented on some beneficial impacts of the proposed formation. The Board then entered into a discussion which included the financial benefit to the existing eight Sanitation Districts if District No. 14 is formed pursuant to the agreement between the Joint Boards and the IRWD Board. It was pointed out that by the year 2000, the proposed population of District No. 14 would increase the Districts' flows by approximately 11%. It was further explained that IRWD currently owns 15 mgd capacity in the Districts' ocean outfall under the terms of a previous and separate agreement. In response to questions relative to the possible increase in service required because of rising population estimates, the consultant explained that the Sanitation Districts must respond to the land use plans adopted by local agencies (cities and county) . Directors also urged that water conservation measures be instituted by all Local authorities. In response to a question on the financial impact of the proposal on residents in the Irvine area, a representative from IRWD assured the Directors that there would be no adverse financial impact to the local residents of the proposed District 14 service area. Oral Public Comments The Chairman called for oral comments from members of the public wishing to speak. Close Public Hearing There being no public oral comments, the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:41 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Directing the EIR consultant to address any comments received on That the EIR consultant be, and is the Draft EIR and to prepare a hereby, directed to address any comments Final Environmental Impact Report received on the Draft EIR, and to for the Proposed Formation of prepare a Final Environmental Impact District No. 14 Report for Proposed Formation of -- District No. 14 after the close of the written public comment period on June 27, 1985. -17- 6/12/85 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Directing an application be filed with the Orange County Local Agency That the Boards of Directors hereby Formation Commission re proposed adopt Resolution No. 85-96, directing formation of County Sanitation that an application be filed with the District No. 14 Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission initiating proceedings relative to proposed formation of County Sanitation District No. 14, as recommended by the General Counsel. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specfications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Contract No. 2-10-1A specifications for Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-IA, authorizing a deduction of $5,638.00 from the contract with Nuevo Camino Constructors Company for substitution of Sparling Model 650 magnetic flow meters in lieu of the Fisher-Porter Max-X meters specified, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 59 - Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 9 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-92-2, ordering annexation of 79.86 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity south of Avenida de Santiago and west of Hidden Canyon Road in the Anaheim Hills area (proposed Annexation No. 59 - Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 9 to County Sanitation District No. 2) . A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made r, a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to That the Selection Committee be, and is agreement with Lowry 6 Associates hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum re Contract No. 2-25 No. 1 to agreement with Lowry 6 Associates re design of the Fullerton-Brea Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-25, to provide for design modifications to accommodate realignment of the sewer at considerable savings in estimated construction costs, and for other miscellaneous revisions. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report re Contract No. 2-10-1A That the Staff Report dated June 12, 1985, in connection with construction of the Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-1A, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 2 to the plans and That staff be, and is hereby, authorized specifications re Contract to issue Change Order No. 2 to the plans No. 2-10-IA and specifications for Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-1-A, `✓ directing the contractor, Nuevo Camino Constructors, Inc. , to change the detour traffic program to all northbound traffic on Euclid Avenue between Warner Avenue and Edinger Avenue. All costs will be in accordance with Section 10-6 of the General Provisions. _18_ 6/12/85 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 3 to the plans and That staff be, and is hereby, authorized specifications re Contract to issue Change Order No. 3 to the plans No. 2-10-1A and specifications for Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-1A, providing for a bonus to the contractor, Nuevo Camino Constructors, Inc. , for early completion of the project as follows- (1) For Warner Avenue to Edinger Avenue: $1,000 per day bonus for each day the project is completed (excluding final connections) before August 31, 1985, with a minimum requirement of 10 days for eligibility; and a $1,500 per day bonus for every day of completion earlier than 15 days. (2) For the remainder of the project: $1,000 per day bonus with minimum requirement of 40 calendar days in order to be eligible. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:00 p.m. , June 27, 1985 for a joint meeting with SAWPA. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:44 p.m. , June 12, 1985. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and Contract No. 3-28R specifications for Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, authorizing installation of a vent line between Manholes 18 and 19 located on Valley View Street north of Ball Road upstream and downstream of the flood control channel, a deletion for modifications to construction procedures and a time allowance for inclement weather, for a net addition of $5,645.00 to the contract with Mike Prlich and Sons, and granting a time extension of 56 calendar days for completion of said additional work and inclement weather delays, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:00 p.m. , June 27, 1985 for a joint meeting with SAWPA. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:44 p.m. , June 12, 1985. DISTRICTS 5 6 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-19-R2 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-93, approving plans and specifications for Replacement of Portions of "B" Trunk Sewer, East of Santa Ana River Junction Structure to Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-19-R2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. dad -19- 6/12/85 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Engineering Services Agreement with Church Engineering, That the Selection Committee Inc. for design of Contract certification re final negotiated fee re No. 5-19-R3 Engineering Services Agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for design of Replacement of Portions of "B" Trunk Sewer from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Arches, Contract No. 5-19-R3, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-94, approving Engineering Services Agreement with Church Engineering, Inc, for design of Replacement of Portions of "B" Trunk Sewer from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Arches, Contract No. 5-19-R3, on an hourly-rate basis including overhead, plus expenses, preliminary and construction surveying, soils investigation and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $17,457.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 - Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 4:15 p.m. , June 25, 1985 at Newport Beach City Hall. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m. , June 12, 1985. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 4:15 p.m. , June 25, 1985 at Newport Beach City Hall. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8.45 p.m. , June 12, 1985. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Contract No. 7-7 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-95-7, approving plans and specifications for the Main Street Pump Station (formerly known as the South Irvine Lift Station) , Contract No. 7-7, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file letter from Southern California Gas Company That the letter from Southern California and authorizing staff to issue Gas Company dated April 29, 1985, be, Change Order A to Purchase and is hereby, received and ordered Order No. 17746 issued to Southern filed; and, California Gas Company re Contract No. 7-8 FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 17746 issued to Southern California Gas Company for relocation of a three-inch gas main in Von Farman Avenue between the San Diego Freeway and Main Street in connection with construction of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, increasing the total amount from $12,957.00 to $44,630.58 for additional costs incurred due to restrictions imposed by the City re working hours, extra manpower needed for traffic control, inclement weather, repair of a water main leak and additional fill sand and slurry required. -20- 6/12/85 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file letter from Southern California Gas Company That the letter from Southern California and authorizing staff to issue Gas Company dated April 29, 1985, be, Change Order A to Purchase and is hereby, received and ordered Order No. 17867 issued to Southern filed; and, California Gas Company re Contract No. 7-8 FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 17867 issued to Southern California Gas Company for alteration of a four-inch gas main in Von Barman Avenue at Campus Drive in connection with construction of the Von Barman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, increasing the total amount from $9,583.00 to $15,401.14 for additional costs incurred due to restrictions imposed by the City re working hours and because of substructure interference in the construction area. - DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:00 p.m, June 27, 1985 for a joint meeting with SAWPA. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m., June 12, 1985. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:00 p.m. , June 27, 1985 for a joint meeting with SAWPA. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m., June 12, 1985. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to 7:00 p.m. , June 27, 1985 for a joint meeting with SAWPA. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m., June 12, 1985, DISTRICT 1 Following a brief discussion it was Second Reading of proposed moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 107 That Ordinance No. 107, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, amending Ordinance No, 106 Pertaining to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 107 by title only. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 107 following roll call vote: That Ordinance No. 107, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, amending Ordinance No. 106 Pertaining to Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be adopted. -21- 6/12/85 AYES: Directors Robert Hanson, Chairman, Ronald B. Hoesterey, Dan Griset NOES: None �.d ABSENT: Roger Stanton DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Fixing date, time and place for a public hearing on proposal to That July 18, 1985 at 7:30 p.m. at the collect sewer service charges on Santa Ana City Hall be, and is hereby, the property tax bills fixed as the date, time and place for a public hearing on the proposal to collect District sewer service charges on the property tax bills commencing with fiscal year 1985-86. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:00 p.m., June 27, 1985 for a joint meeting with SAWPA. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:46 p.m., June 12, 1985. � , Secretary, eo ds of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 -22- FD1•U P.0 41^9 - JT DIST VPPIIING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/25/6 PAGE 1 RI'PORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 4S/01%95 ....... ............_.... ....._._ UARPACT E'0. YFNDON AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 674496 ABC LUMBER CORP. $6.96 HARDWARE I.74L99 ABC METALS SUPPLY. INC. $556.54 ALUMINUM 174110 AP.POVF.NT INC. A4SS.55 ELECTRICAL SI@PLIBB --_--- 174101 AINCO INDUSTRIAL OASCS 1302.00 NITROGEN 0741I2 ALL MANES OTf1EE MACHINE CO. _ f123•B1 OFFICE BQUIPMNR_RePAIR E 79103 /Ll•SI ATC VEHICLES. INC. - f1.498.10 VEHICLE LEASE C74104 ALLIED CORPORATION $6.938.36 CREMI01A1 COAGULANTS T74105 AMEBIC AN SCIENTIFIC_ PRODUCTS i113.3¢...... .. ..LAB_SUPPLI88_____ P 7.106 AMERICAN IIGRA $88.91 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 074167 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 1850.50 PUMP PARTS 174101. APPLIANCE PARTS SUPPLY $38.83 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074109 AGUA IN CORP;.._.._. _.......... __. U0.S10.59__.._._.__.___.__........... -'CHEMICAL COACULi.11T9 674110 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC. $1,122.23 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT P74111 ARROW-RISCO. INC. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1174112 Sc INOUSYRIAL &UFFL97TNL:-___ $50.89 -_ELECTMAL SUPPLIES ----- X74113 HKK CORPORATION $41.445.19 SLUDGE DISPOSAL m 174114 BAVLFSR STAIIONCRS $48.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES X 074115 J.P. BEECIIER AITUM TIRE._ i591.70___ ERNICAL SUPPLIES 974116 RCESON SAND f GRAVEL. INC. S254.40 SAND 6 GRAVEL 474111 BENZ ENGINEERING, INC. 6390.29,_,__________,.C01ER8880H PARTS G 7911H EEAiCCN f3 A.98 SLSCTRRNAL FUPPLYES -� 074119 hEVCO INDUSTRIAL VEHICLES 131N13 ELECTRIC CART PARTS n 074126 hIG BOX MENIAL CO. 61.050.00 TUSK DISPOSAL 174122 a U P -' - -- -ifl 2.92 -- ---- -_- -SURSCRIPTl I" )74122 DURNE ENGINEERING CO. $485.63 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074123 BU TIER ENGINEERING. INC. 1129513,17 ENCINEBR P2-23-6 .. _. __ _ . _. ...___.CASH.. .. 0741F4 V LLI S70C.79 PETTY CASH 0741F5 CPT CALIFORNIA.CLFONNIA. INC. S$19.66 OFFICE LQUIPMBNT REPAIR 0741F6 TICECOMPANY 519.66 VALVES _ F 741F7 T CALIFORNIAAL If O GUIDEEOBN " " - -' A95.S5 SUBSCRIPTION 074120 JOHN CAPOLLO ENGINECRS $3.217.27 ENGINEER P2-25-2 074129 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $135.664.17 ENGINEER PI-21,P2-28-1 4131 CALL PCVf 4 .ENT f1%9.71 TRUCK PARTS P 74132 CIILMVES7 INC. 486.65 ENGINE PARTS :.7413F COAST h U.S.A.. AMEN $6.406.65 ALL-RI K/E OIL/GASOLINE _ !.7A1!3 COAST INSUP/BCC AGENCY f270.000.00 ALL-RISKRAVEESS LIABILITY INSURANCE 174154 CAL MAT $27402 SANG A CAAYBL 17.1 SS F.ONSOLIUATEP ELECTRICAL DIET. $1.726.54 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIER ' 7A13L TOPTOLIDATE F. RFPIDOLS, INC f635.67 SRUBPRENTAL RBPROWCTIONS 7.137 [OVIIDI.NIAL AIR POOLS. INC. fN1.62 TOOL RENTAL 7.13. COOPEP .'MEN GT CEPVICLI fF$526.43 ENGINE PARTS ,74139 COSTA CUI:T MESA AUTO PELECT INC. 1190.21 TRUCK PARTS 14I4U COUNTY VHC LFSALE ELECTRIC 7490.21 CONTRACTOR SUPPLIES L 7A1A1 CAL TON A ASSOC U ITS $143.7ft 70 CONTRACTOR 7-2C-6 _ 7414. CAL Y41.'4 1224,15 HATER RENTAL • 74;43 CY,'1.h.M f.IIPI ANY 17 .576.4`) COLOR VIDEO VID80 IN CNBPRCTION OF GOLDENVEST TRUNK FUND 1;0 91"' - JT f.l S1 NOPNIHG CAPITAL PROCESSING OIiC 4/25/I5 PAGE 2 • -- REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CDUN I _ CLAIMS PAID OS/JI/89 4AR90:7 40. VCNUOP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1,74144 DECO $1,756.74 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 474145 COPADO ENTERPRISES. Rm. $38.546.71 M-021 CHAIN REPLACEMENT __ 17414E DUMAS CIESEL II+JLCTim, - -34.4U9.60 ENGINE REPAIR :74147 EASTMAN. INC. $490.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES ;7410 EUEM6APD EQUIPMENT S323.10 TRUCK PARTS I.74149 CHANEL$ ELSEA - 323.34 REFUND USECHARGE OVERPAYMENT- --- -- �--�-- C74150 ENCHANTER. INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING C 74151 EN7ERPPISC CHEMICAL CO. _ S519.P,6 _ REFUND USBCNARGB OVERPAYMENT_ __ 174152 ENV IAONNENTAL NF.IL ID COALITION_- f 15.20 '1'0%IC ROUNDUP/PUBLICI TY %P EBNSE :..74152 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 6521.63 SLUDGE DISPOSAL !74154 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. S11.00 DELIVERY SERVICE J74155 FIOERGRATE CGRP:' - _...___... .... ..._.__....33.4d5.B3 _ CRATIRCPANHLS _---- p74156 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO. f1.909.28 PIPE SUPPLIES C•74157 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $326.77 LAD SOPPI.IED C74150 FLAP I VERTICAL CbNCAf TE -- - --- - - -_- - i301.BB . . CONCRETE CM-. -I- -_ ---- :74159 FLO-SYSTEMS $1.258.78 PUMP PARTS m 474160 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $227.90 PUMP PARTS >< C74161 CLIFFORD A. FbAkFNT _i4�440.08 - 2NCIMRRR 3-104T S 07A162 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $619.40 WATER USEACE 074163 FRANKLIN MILLER_ . INC. t975UQ.Op SLUDGE GRINDER d7/164 FGf DERICk-PUN6 T-ENCIN EE NEb-G- __-.____. $133.6D ._. ...... .._. . _ PUMP PARTS - C7416b TRICK-GALLAGHER MFG. $198.57 SHELVING 47416E FUEL INJECTION SALES A SEp VICE $33.79 TRUCK PARTS C74167 GAS CHEW PRODUCTB 17NC�------ - -- --- --53 ii116.0b ---- ---- - -u00o SHAVINGS fV 074168 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY $297.56 ELECIRICAL SUPPLIES P74169 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. te55.91 TELEPHONE 27417D GIT.ALICH�MIICHILL] HNC-"- - - - 0.430.36 _- BEE! AM PARTS- ....._.-_-- -- 174171 GOULD. INC. $1.995.00 EMPLOYEE TRAINING/MODICON C74172 HACH COMPANY _ $264.91 LAB CH ICALS___ 074173 MALSTCD L MOGGAN. INC. -- t112.66 PIER PARTS V74174 MARCO CORPORATION 12.150.00 CORROSION SURVEY OF CLARIFIER CHAINS-PLT 12 074175 V.C. NENORIE t CO.. INC. S180.75 ELECTRIC NOTOR 17417E HOLMES TUTTLE DAINC. 90.02 TRUCKPART SUPPLIES •.74177 MOLML'S IHTTL[ DAI SUN $17D.92 TRUCK SUPPLIES C7417n P.S. NGTONS CO.. IA[. $1$211.92 PAINT SUPPLIES ± 41 9 11UNIINGTON SUPPLY $741.14 IIARDNPAR 674160 HYL'NONINE WEST t741.19 PUMP ERR PARTS i.71 I61 IRFERIIL VEST CHINID AL CO. S24.309.19$1537 FERROUS CHLORIDE :•71IP2 ❑ TERNATIL AMP EARED PRODUCTS t165.01 ELECTRIC :7R1A3 I.I.XNATIDIll IUKNJCL CO. f5$4.41 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 041P4 A.I. JCHEMIC EDPF INY f9.91 LAD SUPPLIES _ i 791A0 NEIMA CHEMICALS,S. INC. f2.507.96 CHLORINE '741AA K4ENIN Plpt L gNPTLY CO. f243.A7 PIPE SUPPLIES 6741E7 pINN[DY/JENKS INGINI CPS 214.5.41.91 ENGINEER P2-10 1.741�n NI':". DI 4A InG. IYC. 11.0 0.6N DenR[NCS -�- • 741" .V i.%-LIME EOAP 4596.169 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FI1ND NO 4149 - JT UIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/25/115 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 15/01/89 NAVPAV 110. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 17A150 KOHLNS HALLMARK CENTER 11.06T.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 174151 L.P.V.S.. INC. 1180.62 INSTRUMENTATION 041.2 LEAGUE OF CALIF. CITIFS 195.90 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 17419! LEE A RO CONSULTING [NOR. S14.863.0C ENGINEER P2-29 - i74194 LIFCCOP-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY S480.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES 67419E LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS. INC. $831.66 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES- ---- - ---- i U74196 K.F. LINDSTROM, INC. $14.216.26 DIGESTER CAS UTILIZATION STUD? P7 V197 LOS ANGELES CHEMICAL CO.> $2.742.75 HERBICIDE .174198 LOS ANGELES TIMES 152.00 DISPLAY ADVERTISING 574199 LOS ANGELES TIMES 1130.00 SUBSCRIPTION .74200 THE CHARLES LORE CO. __ 196.65 PUMP PARTS ..._. . _ 074201 M It TRNCN- Sony 11.186.50 TRUCK PARTS 074202 APO CONSTRUCTION $895.00 ENGINE REPAIR OT4203 MABCO ENO INEER ING SALES - _-______-_ $74.20 ELECTRICAL-SUPPLIES ------ /492:4 a YARVA[ CLC[TN BIIICS -----�- -�� - - � $84.11 F3.ECIRICAL SUPPLIES (17A 2L5 MOLE AN NICV EST S U 3.92 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES m 1742G6 MCHASTEP-CARM SUPPLY CO. 2130.75 „ _ ____yARURpBe G74207 J. ARENA N00 N}:�FAQ CMG.------- - -- fU9.44 PIPE SUPPLIES ' .r 07420A NATIONAL LUMBER SUPPLY $496:95 HARDWARE W 1174239 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC_._________ 62S.4U _ . __.___.__..__..__ .OIL SPILL-CLeA1NPlOIFPoSA6 GN t1u NEYNFpMEBr ING 656.05 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 974211 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 18.10 WATER USEAGE 3�. .74.12 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH _ _________S99629.90___ ___,_BALBQA PENINSUU TRUNK SEVER-I MPROVfdIFNi-LFUOY- I 07421J OCCINE NTAL CNEMIEAI. COAP. $9.063.99 CAUSTIC SODA. W 074214 ODESSA BABBIIT .REARING CO. $46.28 ENGINE PARTS 074215 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. CMLORIde_ 974216 CITY OF UBAN6E --_---_-- - - $252.276.80 CONTRACTOR 2-6.1 074•^17 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. SI03.59 LITHIUM CNIARI08 74210 OFeNGF VALVE A FITTING CO. 1564.10 PIPE SUPPLIES.._ 1174214 ORITEK CORP 1I.157.52 ORITER SHEETS - - - -- - 974226 OSBORNE LARORATORIFS. INC. $5.410.00 CONTRACTOR 7-8 074221 OYYGFN SERVICE $2,933.86 OXYGEN ___.__ ..... J74222 COUNTY OF ORANGE 1166.48 LAB ANALYSIS _ 174?23 COU47Y SANITATION DISTRICT $1.790.97 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND 1:74724 FP(. INDUSTRIES. INC. S1T1.19 PAINT SUPPLIES _- 374225 P.W.A. PRINTING $76.96 PRINTING E74226 PACO $1,661.87 PUMP PARTS 174227 PACIFIC SAFETY EBUIPME147 CO. 91,406.84 SAFECI SUPPLIES 074726 PACIFIC YELL SR13.e3 r74?29 PARKSON 1278.7M PIPE SUPPLIES .7413L PARTSUp UNLIMITED Al10.: 139.1$199.•13 BUBBLE PARTS G74731 PARTS UNLIMIICU i199.1! TRUCK PARTS J74232 PATTEN CORP. S194.0b ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 4742J` PICRCICK PAPER PRODUCTS S540.6G OFFICE SUPPLIES P7.134 1•n4 IPA!.114 I?. .J ..,r POSTAGE •1 T4;3.. nq ••IIF FACTI NEF CO 1251.26 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - J7 GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/25/85 PAGE 4 - - REPORT NUMBER AP93 COUNTY 56H1IO DISTRICTS OF ORANGE "Illy CLAIMS CL A INSS PAID 05/61/115 w ApQt l A0. YEMUCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION I'74236 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $30.00 ICE •174237 RAFFERTY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS $149.91 MUM PARTS. 1,74?3M REARitk RICHARb U. FONST. 3900.Y0 BUILDING REPAIRS G7•239 IMF REFIS7ER $3.604.83 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING f74240 THL RE61STER 3124.64 LEGAL ADVERTISING '!7 e291 ROCtlINS B MYERS INC. - - f921.91 PIRA PARTS 'v 074242 ROHEOTSHAY CONTROLS CO. $1.099.77 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT P74203 JOSEFH T. RVERSON L SON. INC. $44.10 ALUMINUM I74209 S.P.F. NICIIINEA4 PUMP REPAIR -7.245 SANCE IGUIPPENT CO. f127.80 STEAM OWN 074246 SANIA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $762.55 ELECTRIC_pOTO&_".__ G74247 YVOHIIE SCHWAB- - - f1A E05 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 10140 SEARS. ROEBUCK L CO. 395.64 TOOLS 179249 SERPLNIIR CONVEYOR CORP. $56.43 CONVEYOR,PARTS_ ______________,.__„_,_ 474250 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 311636.61__.. -... . .. TOOLS _m 1742E1 SMITH-EMERY CO. $89.50 SOILS TESTING X P74252 SMITH FIPE L SUPPLY. INC $524.55 _ _ _ _ PIPE_SUPPLIES t•14 253 to. COAST AIR-bUFLITP­N6T.0157RICT SIL 619.JO - - - SEYA6E TPEATRENT APPLICATION EVALUATION FEE .--' 1174254 SOUTH COAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT $126.14 OFFICE "RETURN to P74255 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. 5331.495.61 POWER__ � 474256 S0. EA L. f97.S91.70 - "-- -"- - - -�NATUSAL CAS 171257 SO. CALIF. TPAME SERVICE S2P8.11 ELECTRICAL REPAIR D ?7425P SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. __ ___ iS93.90 _ _ DIESEL FUEL 1 _ 074259 SPARKL E STE -DRINk IilO.4A7ER" S80. STEM WATER -� D74261 SUAERI STEEL SNEERING $148.00 STEEL 07.261 SUPERIOR SWEEP IA6 SOUTH f108.00 SNBEPING SERVICE "7a262 [ASIlC 7DIV. iiI-SYRRbN [0 NY'.'-" - "' "�'----"---�- -- f194.R5 '- � "� "'�� LAB SUPPLI85 (74?63 TAYLOP.-DUNN $389.64 TRUCK PARTS '!74?69 TOUYrS LOCK L SAFE SERVICE 350.6E LOCKSMITH SERVICE C74265 TRANSAHERICA DfLAVALI INC: -- - - 3223.07 FREIGHT CHARGES G74216 TRAVEL LOG $246.00 AIR PARE 074267 TRAVEL TRAVFL $364.00 AIR PARE ?7426H TRIDENT TRUCK LINE. ifIC. - 126.76 FREIGHT CHANCES `•74'F9 TFUCK R AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $3,819.60 TRUCK PARTS .7427P TUPf SALES $210.00 PIPE SUPPLIES 674?71 J.G. THICKER L BON, INC. $120.08 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 974772 FRANK ULTIMO 11.114.0E GATE REPAIR f74273 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3 . TRLIVERY SERVICE ` N 742 UN $6 UNIVERSAL MACS f633.65 65 TRUCK PARTS .7A275 V)IIV{REITY FBSUCI aT t'.S. INC f66. PUBLICATION 74276 V'AN 6CILHTIFIC 32r N59.74 7. LAB SUPPLIES : 74277 VALLEY CIVICS SUPPLYC.R. 33.159.30 PIPE SUPPLIES R 742]P VALVE SERVICES. INC.0 7142.75 VALVE 174?T9 DUNE VAN ROPN £13.31 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 07.E n6 Vftr54AN4S INPU'JP.IAL Prf Lit CC Trp).9% PIPE REPAIR �- , T4?fl VOI6 YAC111" Wm I.)) BASIN REPAIR FUND NO 91 ,9 - JI FIST VONRINF CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/25/85 PpgC } REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . . . ..._..—.. CLAIMS PAID 05/ll/R5 W40RANT No. VFNOOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 8 N 2N2 CApL WARREN A CO. $563.24 LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 074283 WAUKESMA ENGINE SCPVICCNTEP $1,317.91 ENGINE PARTS .. ......._ 174PA4 YEPCO PUMPS S318.41 PIRG PARTS --- -- J'M286 VINCENT VENTI FLOORS , INC. 41,696.00 CARPETING '74206 J.L. WINGERT CO. S1.526.40 PUMP C792P7 KCROK CORP. $646.06 COPILR LRA38 W .17426A GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES $1,430.09 VALVE 074289 STEVE BUBALO,COMSTRUCTION C.O,_ ,,. ,,,-,.___7307,199.82 u .CONTRACTOR 7-8 074290 MIK B, PRLICM 6 SON§ 847T318.74 CONTRACTOR 3-28R TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/01/85 $2,248,579.93 m SUMMARY AMOUNT S 12 OPER FUND 62 AGO FUND 9 7r690.99 --_-! 63 OPER FUND 252,732.56 /3 ACO FUND _..— ,687,22 _.__—_._...... ____... 65 OPER FUND i4�742.e7 ----- FS AGO FUND 6.735.00_ . ..._...._. . 1 06 OPER FUND - 07 OPER FUND 06.09 07 F/R FUND 2,717.82 /11 OPER FUND _ _ . - ......--_..._. .794.538.49 __ . . .. . .. ......—_...—___...._._.____._ F 566 OPER FUND 1,436.91 0546 AGO FUND 4,449.90 0667 OPER FUND - .. 4.i 32.12 32.12 JT OPER FUND BO4,877.01 CORP 662,392.20 . .. ...... SELF FUNDED WORKERS CORP. INSURANCE FUND 2,354.16 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 58,564.41 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/01/85 $2.248.579.93 / 'I IF I LIL: 11 '.I .1: 1:•I ...I.n la.. 1 .1 llAl. I'NGI'I 9F IN6 DATE a/-9/Ph LA6i.--..}_---- PIfORi IIUMOEN !P4'• f' OS IV SNMI If rION DISTRICT:: !IF OPICPI. fOUN7v I t9i I 1 1 1•. u;•v ." u•DUNI I-ESC+IPT ION I '.7xry • I if LUI.019 CORP. 7274.71 HARDWARE r7R ll! •'u; Of TALS DUFILY, INC. 1221.52 ALUMIHUM N71l12 4NC IMfnn NfNATI^ 111P32.47 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES tCI IPL IN, Irllpr V13, Ir C. t9t7.93 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT _ - -- '•7471e L'IVAICIII 1'Fl if? 1'LFVTTI'S 13.76B.PC OFFICE EQUIPMENT 7431-, el- Lp OG11L'iP 6 CI•CHICALS. Ibl. *4244h0 AMMONIUM NVOROCKLORID '7411r. ALA'; Yr^:_Pep RICO. COPP. 31.694.pV E7BPEAItt�fbi Islox STORAGE BUILDING . 7A+17 ILL -!Tell VLRICL7.S'. IRE• $1.659.1 'VEHICLE LEASE . 7A+1L Lit llf f.I1N FOP AIiUA --- - - fB3.59:`.44 CHEMICAL COAGULANT'- - --- 74 '1- /-: •Uf.v. Alt, F11 TI:11• ]PC. Y171.41r PAINT SUPPLIES 7x!} Apfl•IC11^ CHIP IIAI, •nfll'TV 1l P.:O SUBSCRIPTION I: 01spI Au. 41L AN SC ILNI IF IG PRODUC IS-- -- - --. 166.00 ° ""-"'---' """'" 'LAB SUPPLIES---- P74322 AHI'+ICON TECHNICAL FUFPLT $749.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES n -.7A VS R.r EI'ICLN VULKAA CCRF. 63,95. .00 PIPE SUPPLIES " +70i9 ANAMF.iR-PIIKIMFSN79'11'-"-"""" "" "'-- 'DEEM CE'EQUIPMENT---- n I'll-ILIA FA;! SHI,f INC. $25P.41 TOOL REPAIR -. . , 147^6 Ag1111A v SPAIN CONSTPUC11011 51 .v3q.4p SEWER LATERAL REPAIRS-GIST LT7 t744;7 INF-ANIHUN-NAEw16R-PP.-------- -Sj 1555r99-----------'PUMP'PARTS �c i7437r1 FM9f1N-n ISCO, INC. 4350.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES '..1.I i•111321 CC INDIISTRILL SUPPLY, INC. 3325.27 PIPE SUPPLIES W AN!Sn I`KN-CURP0944444 151.611r74------SLUDGE'DISPOSAL ?•7Y 371 P.rr- I:LVWOOD CO.. INC. $127.56 PLYWOOD -.74!32 PION OP AMFPICA IN97.95 BONDS 6 COUPONS e 74033 HAWK -OF -4MEw-A6A-Hi-E-BA '4SP.55- -EMPLOYEE-TRAVELTEPENS 1 174!74 PIERLY C ASSOCIATES. INC. i550.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION I-A 1,743l5 PIG OOK RENTAL CO. i1,870.00 TRASH DISPOSAL 17433E PL4P' 1. lf.{MFR-+•FA -91E6.69 --TOOE'REPAIR :74.37 PL W: DIAMOND HATLAIAL9 $1.877.93 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL '7473M 1'01AN K.IGNf TO Ff NVICE. INC. $1,581.54 ENGINE PARTS 474339 TWISIOIhRARK-MGWGGA�-LN 1Sr00 PRE=EMPLOYMENT-MEDICAL-ERAN 0743A0 W.C. BODOMF $121.70 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE g74141 RRnWN A CALDWELL $210.00 LAB SERVICE u 41AAa1 pUGKPVF--PA4-PRPM1tlHb--- --iP4r9T-----"----'---PPOPANE'-' -17%+43 VILLIAF H. f:UTICA i794.93 PETTY CASH '74l44 1 1 F I•!CONPITIONING CP. F345.Of1 PUMP REPAIRS J74345 l'PI CALIF UNNI-k.-1 H0r---- ---- 69A0+00---- ------------- WHO PROCESSO"RAINI ^7A446 CS COMPANY $34.47 VALVES 074.N7 CAL-GLASS FOR PESEARCH, INC. $177.g7 LAB SUPPLIES P7A34A CAL 90l.TH-WU WPFN7-f.-0.--- --- - - - ---- 1139.00 "'- ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT'REPAIRS-'--'---""- t1r!r5 1'4.::I SI C1, CPA,I.ILI' $1.IA4.i•C PARKING LOT SIGNS I.I :Lt- If AMS!IS4I ON 1F05.14 TRUCK REPAIRS 074 ASI fLI•IUFr Sf RVICr CO. 1S.u25.P0 PUMP REPAIR .74152 C111'H1AF 61 1WOUS TO it S. II'C• 15.IIH.12 PUMP PARTS L 74!•! CHI'/PnIJ V.S.A.. INC. I17.435.3P GASOLINE 0 •.:F.DHr HARDWARE .._ _.... ._ r n 4. ..4 L nr r F . .. .....__._. ... L149.34 r7x'! f ',r -V:"• ll .+r i.' 32F.45 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE .II 10 .(-.1.- I .. IIRI PFOC'SSINI, DATE 5/;+"/N` PAGE -2- FTFORI FUHR[A pF43 [:111 IV aH II:I16R IV FA l[TS of L`9a Lff [1•UNR U .IH;' FA IC ::44;• . YI '. '• pPUUNT L".FrE 111 I OII 7.)•{ L�).&1 11'.I.ltMfl IGCAI'V 5175.I14 TRAVEL INSURANCE CPIR'Ll CMEVFPLA7 II7R.5. TRUCK PARTS :-7.•56 fora.• fneF 77^3.6A ELECTRICAL REPAIRS -- 1 T+`^1 CC ::t-L I:IATUIJ III( IF !rtl rl' 1. SS•239.21 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES . 74}(., f1^TIKL%TIL I ., I IF(1 11P6.14 TRUCK REPAIRS .4.3.4 raalnGL DATA{,.}FOFATIO} - - 1144.16 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -- -743r.2 Rift, CCh0b (01.STFUCTION Cr S1r501.68 BUILDING REPAIRS +74i6.! [PRi-NUSIOM FRROUCIS 164,767.36 CHEMICAL STORAGE TANKS :-T.564 Cn4Ts rF.9A-pUT'• F.P}S. -IMF-.----- - 159803 -- - ---TRUCK PARTS - 'T4545 f'Il'.IV .:AleTIM:F,CI rf--vjrr� 165J. 10 WINDOW WASHING SERVICE .T.}V6 fJI.^.IT '1"CLI SAL- ILECIPIC t165.63 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C:;UNtV VICC- AAC -- --- - 1121.25 - ----- -- - TRUCK PARTS 574'fP CAL tAlrP 1334.80 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL !'7436? I" . 16[. $3 r203.69 PIPE SUPPLIES '743)6 L1M116S_l.l eF--SI"e.V ICC--- --- _._ .-__.._ -$5.612.44 __ _ _. . . ._.TRUCK PARTS :74`71 1^., f.'.A CS t32.60 EMPLOYEE MEETING EXPENSE '7aeJ2 1`fci 12.29/.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES rV1 0443/3 OI;1,74 ANAL YT}CtL-I44 ---.._..._ .-._-__._. .__.-1259.4E- - - ELECTRICAL-EQUIPMENT° X 117.F74 OICKSOr. Sf.FFTY rMODUCTE CO. 4479.12 SAFETY SUPPLIES _ !•74375 Pir TEPICH - POfT CO. 6710.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES '•TApA DOp AOP-f OTC GN}cF1.-}NA. ---SP9.515.t6--- -------CONTMETOR-PW-142 ' 74V'7 Go' tt I-Ir SFL If-Jr Cllnk 55.101.47 PUMP REPAIR -1 .74 RR "U•'A L Comept Y 136.174 HARDWARE n i.N9 nU I1 {F0ARN6-"I,P.------- -- 1J98.96-' - -------PAINT-SUPPLIES cu L7A•u,r FA!4 Pp N. iMC. 51.221.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1J -T<361 FGIHC11 KEPI[OL GROUP. INC.. t13?.50 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL EXAMS 'Oa.RP IRICPP-PICFOSAt RFFV ICt_-_ -- _.- .- _-S16.R37.59 - -- SLUDGE DISPOSAL -- ------ ,� 1.•;� FE:I "/I. LVI,+EF'" CnO1 . 597.9n DELIVERY SERVICE '74•r4 tl"ra6-lF1 CORI . 6075.J3 GRATING PANEL �74J..5 IIG:NC:• L PORI!. CO. --- - - - - - ------ - 3,391. 6- - - ---- STRIP CHART-- +, •-7.3r6 fl`t'EP CC'iIFOL$ IMIL.,IMr. 5257.33 PUMP PARTS <74'•.') FLUIV IAUI•LIMG SYSTFME 17J3.24 PUMP PARTS u irnLALD L. FAY a ASSOCIATTF _ ._ $825.00 - SAFETY CONSULTANT ------------ :7. .••. T..- fn..9r'r CA-!! ANY 1715.43 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES T+ " 1i :'1.P rPtV6Ft FI0t. 175,219.33 CONTRACTOR PW-141 74" 1 ri of LAnvLR6. L:6DURl64 r, I.l . 13 R.40 LAB ANALYSIS- -------------- "7.!') (111 01 Fe LLEATt'P $59.51 WATER USEAGE •7.•. 3 rW i•a l6lf R'RNfr. 161'. Se1.' 9 EQUIPMENT REPAIR :7.•104 f.�::e FI. LUMI,(R 1'n. a662.+4 HARDWARE - ^ 74 • a_ • L•1+'•, T` ,9.. , 11r. .656..^ WOOD SHAVINGS r„1 NI•tt•''•• IF- I'll 11 - !4!•. 'l EQUIPMENT REPAIR 'f I., • •Ia IL1 (1P1t aU.r(• )1 )7.^6 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i 74!-•: .:. .I 'L1 IIL.1'.'r..! C=. 17,795.`•4 TELEPHONE ?'. rl. 11 if"-1111O•'LL . 1. r. ♦119.112.J9 BUDD CHAIN -T.+ .J I :.m C . . 61, 11 a54.'4 LAB SUPPLIES --- •• . i r. .1 '1 .'-N. 'i VACUUM TRUCKING `F 1� Ild-L •1 1 " JI . :P1 ,J=A V•I ,AN IPL PR UCL'SSI!10 DAIr v-" /85 POOP'-"-s --- PLF'ORl NUMPC.N AF43 CIUI.IV " 11111TICt' PISTPICI'3 Or OP41d•/ f0UN11' Pain y/ti/•5 .. .... _. . . . .. . .._-__ r:r•F:' 1 ', vl 1 ' •ry A,•PUNI PLECF IP7 ION '7.44 RU• •k' ILVA% f12.17 EMPLOYEE MEETING EXPENSE 7A4.3 .10"It UI 11`2 $71.75 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE '•1 u•1 Y.C. r'i vPA if F f0.. INC. 1596.E2 PIPE SUPPLIES -7un" I'ID! I It F111f' 11.5 15bl.46 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 7.4 .t 111v 0i 11,14 It,YOA EACH $8.270.24 WATER USEAGE A1.4 1 ♦IIt:1 IN( ION tth(H RUPbER STAPt --- - - - 686661 OFFICE SUPPLIES-" 1744:P 111114 INC VON SUF(LY SA9.55 HARDWARE 1,7.99n HIPPO CATE C.ORr. S2,II9.54 GATE PARTS 'N41• 1 1 FP,H5PPRT6TIOP - - - ---- A43.435"3 " ' VACUUM TRUCKING ""--"-"- ..7• ull 11''' L.I Al. vrbT CMr✓ICAL CO. 19011. 17 FERRIC CHLORIDE '7a412 1"! II14r•114. TPFr tUfD FRAOUCIE 1750.19 HARDWARE ..74.11 Ih6VAK FAP1'F __...__ .. . ._. _.......___.. . . __._61.620.21 ___. -._ OFFICE-SUPPLIES- :74414 INSi ROPENTAII00 LAROPAIDOV.INC /3,018.14 LAB SUPPLIES 74411 lwC 12-71ONIL "IISINESS MICb INr 9351.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES ••RN4 IRVI" 4A9PP-VlTF+-PISIRI01---.--- ._..__., 14,110.... . ...... _. WATER USEAGE ...__ -.____.... ' 71.411 SP'L ll IVIk3 515,411 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 74.1h A/.uAA '-LANINCS . SUPPLY A313.99 BEARINGS M , 144iS M.F FAFETV--FF O.•WP{lr------- - 61B3FY3'-"---'-'-""-'-----SAFETY SUPPLIE 2 C74424 NEENAH PIPL A '•UFPLV CO. 92.473.12 PIPE SUPPLIES r71421 Kr LCO O;LEE 6 iNGINEERING CC. 145.76 RUBBER PRODUCTS C7U :•74;22 K14F-PLMINF.-16Er----- 744ri PIC1.1 IU"I t KACb INr N(,PKS $926.12 PUMP PARTS -'I :7A4., FL' C11-L IKI' CUR' $2.114.511 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ,7.425 L A H i1AEFOAK-SUPFL"O -- 114567,03-'-- '-" UNIFORM-KEN At 1 47.426 I.P.N.B„ It-C. 187.71 OXYGEN W fq.427 LtIVr;.L1, CGLOR LAR $46.411 FILM PROCESSING .qu26 LF-40 PK9-TP, I4C+_.--_-_.__.._... .. .. ......._-_...-. .. $53.40 - ._ . FILM PROCESSING, 17..n. 1-,CA 11.1'C TO IC C11. 144.511 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES "746!' LI''1 f11,.-,4 F 1'1Y •I..PY I Cr SI PITY 1115.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES "74.31 lli.all hG VISOR IPUTON6,-INC. - ---- - -Sl.)R7.25 - - ELECTRICAL'SUPPLIES --- i74.32 LILLY 1vrrt;ETIING 177.10 PRINTING I0?1433 M.P. 1.InOSTNOP, INC. 14,855.23 EIR CONSULTING 47..N U•• CPa6LF.F LC•kP-fP. -- 121.16903 PUMP PARTS .i4HF I111r., 18013.42 1:0. 1BKT.92 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 'lnau u..11'.'P Cii 11 . LV 12212n7. 17 ODOR ABATEMENT STUDY - DIST /q 'R4J1 A';U:k Iu.•Cn 64P•LY 151E In HARDWARE 1744!1 P6e•:191 Ttl51kDLUI:ll t. INC. 1235.112 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS ^744!n ArS ICP rLFCIPLPIf.S COUfb PI' $494.16 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES : 1uu R1v NAPf1l 1P,2" 1. ir LANDSCAPE " - Tu451 I r •1 - 4" 1. IF.; :.Ni PUMP PARTS 74x4; 1 •• I r I I•'L �11­ • I• I . 10".1! - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 71.44•. 1;(-' :,.L.. ('1. 1'I l>L C1 . IIli. 14 HYDROCHLORIC ACID 144ua4 vC.A• I• V••C.L4A SUPPLY CR, .143.40 TOOLS •'7e e4- I'I• " 14 F,1V 11..A 16"rlI C, 11.1.%1 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1.7.... . 1• it •d'.v. 6f. 16 . I -C. 11 •71r;. •7 TRAILER REPAIR T•4,( " • e . I 1'4•'41.' 1' PUMPS 1'l'1: af. : „1 :•I .: -F•n INS :A.. I •YI FIHCYSSINI'• DATE WH lv = 1•AUC' '4' . . ..._.._.. Pfl'0AT UUMULP At AS r,.0111 SII:IIAIItN CISINICIS Of BRINFE C(,UOII - CIFIPR xA lu -5r757N5 - ' 1111 ',T b • Yf 1•.'j LOOP I•IINT 9l SLlllfllOro u 7.44.1 FIt .I FOII'AV UP]'It RS. IN1:. 116,.23 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 7111-1 FO,,TC0f'1 I:Y LLF VAT OP CCRf OF 132A.'IF ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE x r 7445` .I. At R. 1 +G. fi5.41 MECHANICAL EQUIP MENT' ---'----'_'-- x -- -- ., '1...1 : : ry 1. I r'l. 11.593.75 TELEPHONE SYSTEMS CONSULTING SERVICE 7AAF7 • I ".'.•I IILTE - P"L IA C"fF . 11B.4P3.3M FILTER BELTS 7 IUTAL BI•L ICAL CORE ----__ _-- -- 62.3P4.49 . ' - CAUSTIC SODA x 1,74450 01.1NI Ir CPLPICAL CAN. S24.699.22 CHLORINE --- -- ------ 1744tV COOL 1141 FAINT 4 PODI 1414.64 TRUCK PAINTING u 144yA n6fN PLUON--EN.--1PF. - _._-.__.____--_ CI .tA 31 P6-- _'- CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS • 7^N) C-(V n.I4r CLIISI 11 SCr VICE. 31 .3.IF BUILDING MAINTENANCE rl*4+^ l'01I . I"F1' $1.134.74 ENGINE PARTS ,.1r,e0v 64I•I•RAI .LAGORAJURIL S, INC.---- - - CONTRACTOR'7-B-- „ n74461. UYVnEN SERVICE f.302.114 NITROGEN .174461 f0U61Y OF TRANCE $1, 139.44 LAB ANALYSIS I, uYWHr rnuu7Y..tAN IlAT ION-�IF9fifT------- -f3ru51.'iP-- '- '-" ' ----REIMBURSE-WORKERS-COMPENSATION-FUND--------- 17^^[.5 1'I"• INr115 TF it C. tNC. 1399.39 PAINT SUPPLIES 7nb o 1'Ar IF IC SAFFIV LGUIFVFt'T CF, SAl.43 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ,:7M14A9 f:l.ACDF. OURII;L=6-tyt.]F11,6-- ----Fg rd5,1.UU-- --------COMPUTER SOFTWARE - X r7Y466 rlI CAL 3 LIIPWIG. INC. 030.723.40 CONTRACTOR M-022 _ :74417 CHARLES PASINLI $10.66 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE .--. ,:744AN FFNNY If.AI CON.-R46i pIL._I N;_ �.-FH.42A.9B- - ----HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ; "•iti: vM IPPOS' ECF S3).1B ICE • 7AA11 I , I L+PFC-IKT''IPV . IPY. 15.8'0.0 CLEAN BOILERS n 1.7a471 IA IAPOI OI SI'OiAL -TRASH DISPOSAL x bd 174472 10F PEPISTER $369.72 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING r L7447.3 PSYND411. INC. S1.J62.64 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 174474 PT01+fLlNC-P9E6F. n .__.._._- --.__._.. ..__�_.__. NL90 ._.. ._.... .. PUBLICATION .._.-__--- ___- ,• '.ic M1Y• F'v Hl'1N:. 3 -YEN: Jr-C. $1,934.25 PUMP PARTS 'iA47s II( CP•: FLECK INCC.KILr :7014.49 TRUCK PARTS .r 74477 ,.Y.n-m I:CN . . _.._ ...__._...-.._ S16.11 . _ _.-PIPE SUPPLIES--_ ' 7n47P 5'•NTA 1114 ELCCIPTC POTCAS 1766.98 ELECTRIC MOTORS 7.47. •CA6 FHI'CHA£E CENTER $24.00 PUBLICATIONS ^CIIPAP- -.. $21.52 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ------'-"- ------- •'7A4-t . 10- -UCK Y CO.. 1195.22 JANITORIAL EQUIPMENT +Y+a:;• .� -11, .. SOI FII $1.746.7R TOOLS N.Vn3 •.rI fl:7 CC,AI . 13.496.0 BID CULTURES 7••41.4 E;IUT' EPA" OFT ICI lP'IAPIAI 11 .998.95 OFFICE FURNITURE 7..4.... ! trrt-ri,:I CILIF . FPI"l'. CO. 121.F44.99 POWER x ')441 , •.. r4i . I.Aa n.. 11.117A.E1 NATURAL GAS 7".•• 7 ;:I ". 41 "• (':. 11 F.44 WATER USEAGE 7 .1 ... •r.... 211 !I a 011 1 i'. 1.4 '?.1 P KEROSENE 714r= • Ii '.• f1,:.;.1F0:"I ITT. La. 31I 5.141. ... BUBBLE DIFFUSER INSTALLATION-PLANT 1 --- 1nn ITT" (if. 155.'•2 HARDWARE � T. I E, 111 . 117 r1`1 I'I , 1152.417 PIPE SUPPLIES RA•y :v P:r 11 :.I; f1 LAI J.77 ALUMINUM ' ]""'' n " £• : rT 1.^r REFUND USELHARGE OVERPAYMENT I t•(,l• 1.0 : JI . I: I Y1 :r IF 1'•u IIAI PP DCt SS INN VAVf 5/••?/RF I•A6F—. FIFOFT kVMOEP M93 r rON7v AAhll:Tlbk PIST Y.IC15 OF ON91.41 CUIIFTT rLJ1P1 f•AIP 15/15IP9 ... .___ . n•V+rl (d.. 1• r. ;.r 0 "UN I Lr,SCP I P T I OH '7•e9r 14,'041 U-t UK C1.A1 . 1261.' 6 BICYCLE RACKS '7RA:R SUE, I v FIt I:AL 6CF VICI 12.235.59 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS •,7a PNt Pa eU1 AI If" 13.7?1,57 PIPE SUPPLIES' - ---"----------- 7APP7 !I.-VI V("C ?. I Virl CP. 151.95 SURVEYING SERVICES 7 AA'.P IRA Itr Fr le, f2.3PO. )C LANDSCAPING '7Nar 111•1Y LYI•I Wi1FIVI• - 53,759.45 PUMP PARTS ' 71!.41 I.IPCOA CORITNVr110k CO. . II'C 123.6117.13 CONTRACTOR I-2R-2A 7.66I 7110111'SUN LACGUI'F TO. 1/.5/R.15 PAINT SUPPLIES 471!.•:F 741Vt1 7RAVFL _- .. .__.. ._—__.__. ... 1.276.07___ .-. -. AIR FARE 7" . 1.1 (F IOTI ]'Irr Iv. IUC. S7.114.23 TRUCK PARTS 7•!:.a LN1 n.I f:F r,l Y[. IAr. t1.896.22 CONTRACTOR 5-26 IF41,e ULT 1110. ______. __._--__.__._.. . ._..—.--_DP7r7P le P3 .....-._._..__.__. __ -CONTRACTOR-PN-129' )74Ff6 UNION UIL CP. OF CALIF. 11-12.31 GASOLINE 17A5G7 UNITED VAACLL 5CAVICC }R3.11 DELIVERY SERVICE ' 7A5:e: 4F-F0VFkH9FAT -AU INT IhF--RFF-1 Ef.—._ _.._ _._ -}13r9P_..__.__,.. . ._ .__.___.PUBLICATION._. ..__ � 7N'^" VI" SCIFk11TIC $411.16 LAB SUPPLIES 'Ter l: VAllly CITIIS IUftl.v rt1. ' $3.756.46 PIPE SUPPLIES F]Rf•I1 -VAN-6Ah-GOPP.--- ---- --flSri Y---------- - OFFICE EQUIPMENT 771!I2 ROr' VAOL 155.35 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE A•-. ' 7-513 LANKY VALSER ASSOCIATES. IFC. 111.588.85 P2-23-6 CLAIN CONSULTING LTD 47A574 -JOY.- A.-VAJ-k EP.-- fi1C5A57---- —ODOR CONTROL CONSULTING •7V!15 Nrl ll'Nu MEDICAL CINTEP. $4.'336.49 REFUND USECMARGE OVERPAYMENT '71V46 FF�TEF I. VIC•1 A JLLOT S399.41 MELDING SUPPLIES l7y +•74617 4011 F.-FINE-6-VkkVILLh -- 61 r9tl9s65---- -----'DEEP OCEAN-SLUDGE-DISPOSAL-STUDY I • 715111 J.L. VINGEFT CO. 13P.25 VALVE ASSEMBLY L17 "71` Iy VII16 5CICWTIFIC $944.46 LAB SUPPLIES "'Pr.F.-YADVIFY-ARFOF1Aa F-P._-_-_._—..._....-- /521156 ............... _ VALVE..__. 7H 21 zit 10 (4Pl( 7 rr P.ONNrL SP.612.52 TEMPORARY HELP ----------------- 7071L CIAIM6 FAIT .S/1}/A5 }1.151.2:33.ea FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/09/85 PAGE 6---- REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/15/85 SUMMARY AMOUNT ®1 OPER FUND $ 96.86 #2 OPER FUND 5,373.19 ®2 ACO FUND 17.926.59 /2 F/R FUND 42.83 ®3 OPER FUND 10,416.40 n R5 OPER FUND 2.769:25 #5 ACO FUND 4,920.23 16 OPEN FUND 25.60 n ®7 OPEN FUND 5.409.77 - - -- - -- ------_- --- ®7 F/R FUND 2,652.61 °f Oil OPER FUND 7,723.03 1596 OPEN FUND 824.37 /597 OPER FUND 3,600.78 of JT OPER FUND 295,480.64 n CORE 598,618.05 _ °1 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 3,601.70 rrI JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 5416719:10-- - ---- -- X , 1 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 5/15/85 $115017203i00-- - -- —--"----- --_—' — Ql I I Y 'll h FUND HO 91^9 - J7 DIST WORKING, CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/23/85 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNT% SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/29/05 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 074567 ABC PAINT STRIPING SERVICE S160.00 - - - PAINT PARKING LINES - ---------- - � C745EP A.R.A. MANUFACTURING CO. $20.67 AC DRYER. 174569 ACTION INSTRUMENTS. INC. $1,913.79 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES J74570 ALLIED CORPORATION $7.883.33 - - - - ---- --CHEMICAL-COAGULENTS , 074571 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $113.13 LAB SUPPLIES 474572 AHETRON . 2267.70 LOUD SPEAKER 1:745T3 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION S12.656.00 - -- -- -----INSTALL TELEPHONE CONDUIT ----- -- -—---- '• 374574 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. 31.052.85 PUMP PARTS ,1 C 74575 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES GROUP 5125.00 TOWEL RENTAL C74E76 AOUATIC CENTER 152.00 - ----------AIR CYL IMUIR TESTY 074577 ARROW-RISCO, INC. 2158.63 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ni G74570 AUTO SHOP EOUIPMENT CO. S190.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 074579 BAN CORPORATION $60.978.75 - - -- SLUDGE DISPOSAL ---- -------- - ---- ^ 074-st bANCROFT-UHITNEV CO. $595.56 PUBLICATION G74581 BANK OF AMERICA MT L SA $149.05 TRAVEL EXPENSE 'T'll 074582 BARYON SALES COMPANY ITT S1O3.16 ----- — ELEGTRI6AL-SUPPLIE X 074583 BAYLESS STATIONERS $137.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 074^_P4 BEARINGS. INC. $211.19 BEARINGS 674585 PECKHAM INDUSTRIAL - 51.046.28 - ----- ----- ---ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES- '� 47-586 EEVCO INDUSTRIAL VEHICLES, 3437.17 TRUCK PARTS —{ 374587 SOPAR MAGNETO SERVICE. INC. 5265.41 TRUCK PARTS 374588 BRENNER-FIEOLER L ASSOC.. INC. - - - --31.316.23 AIR-00MPRGSS0 'C7 074589 BROWN L CALDWELL $88.00 LAB SERVICES 07455d STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. S910.99L.44 CONTRACTOR 7-8 •I C 74591 WILLIAM H. BUTLER -- - —..- 5239.09--- -------PETTY-CASH-- --- 074592 PUTTERWORIH (PUBLISHERS) INC. $67.06 PUBLICATION u74593 C 3 P RECONDITIONING CO. 5925.08 PUMP REPAIR C71594 CPT CALIFORNIA, INC. - __ _ __. ..-_. --_-._481.2^- COMPUTER SYSTEM REPAIR 074595 CS COMPANY $1,448.26 VALVE 074596 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO.. INC. $70.44 HYDROCHLORIC ACID ) f - 674597 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COALITION $315.00 -- - ---------OFFICE EQUIPMF.NY_REPAIM, C74590 CALIFORNIA SAFETY COUNCIL SIID.00 SAFETY SUP-LIES 074599 CALIF. WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSN. $3.775.90 CDNFFRENCE REGISTRATION ^� 374600 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS S66.I17.65 --- -- - - --FNGINEFRING P2-21.-P1.22 071601 CENTURY SERVICE CO. $730.00 ENAINF REPAIR 074602 CHEMWEST INC. $62.82 .FREIGHT CHARGE 07-603 CHESSELL CORP. $273.70 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES G74E94 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $7,310.97 GASOLINE d T4E95 DEAN CHILTON CONSTRUCTION $99.400.00 CONTRACTOR P2-28-2 27466E KIK9ERLY CHRISTENSEN 328.70 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 074607 CIVIC CENTER LOCK L SAFE $424.68 LOCKSMITH SERVICE 074600 COAST COMPUTER CENTER. INC. $2.291.97 APPLE COMPUTER O746 COMPUTER BAP ON 394.34 PRINT HEAD FOR DOT MATRIX PRINTER G74610 1d CORK AC CORP $17.56 FREIGHT CHARGE :174611 CONSOLIOATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 12.324.30 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 574612 CONSOLIDATED REPRODUCTIONS $1.785.12 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTIONS _ 1 FUND NO 91°9 - JT DIST YOPKING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 5/23/89 PAGE 2 + ( REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . / CLAIMS PAID 05/29/85 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION G74613 CONTROL DATA CORP. S3,283.00 COMPUTER REPAIR -'- n74614 COSTA MESA AUTO PARTS, INC. $217.96 TRUCK PARTS C74615 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $730.98 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C74I16 COUNTY WIDE AMC $238.50 TRUCK PARTS----- --- n 074617 CRANE VETOR CORP. $946.30, HARDWARE +/ 074618 CAL WATER $164.45 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL 074629 CUSTOM MASONRY S5,224.50 F.ONSTROCTION NATFRIAI- ----------- ---- , 174E20 ONE, INC. $22.41 PIPE SUPPLIES +( 074621 DAILY PILOT $40.00 LFGAL ADVERTISING 1.74622 DANIEL$ TIRE SERVICE $781.43 - --------- TRUCK PARTS - -- 074623 DECO S116.69 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 071624 DELTA ANALYTICAL DIV. $923.67 ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 074625 DICKSON SAFETY PRODUCTS CO. S1.314.40 -- SAFETY SUPPLIES -- --- -- ------- 074E26 DICKSONS $841.19 FLECTRICpI SUPPLIES 174627 DIETERICH - POST CO. $616.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES M 674628 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 914.84.- - .._- -PRINTING--- X 174629 DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. $28.898.25 BUDD CHAIN REPLACEMENT .� 674630 DRIVER TESTING SERVICE S28.00 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL EXAM C74631 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. S86.34 _-._._._.-_-_PAINT SUPPLIFS------ -- 074632 DUPONT CO. $1,169.18 TRAINING FILMS -I 074633 EASTMAN, INC. 9956.83 OFFICE SUPPLIFS .( 174634 ENCHANTER, INC. $3,500.00 _ ._--..-._-.OCEAN-MONITORING-ITT , 1J0746.35 FISHER CONTROLS INTL.,INC. $296.72 PIMP PARTS L74636 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $24.20 LAB SUPPLIES C74637 FLAT A VERTICAL CONCRETE $971.50 CONCRETE CUTTING - --------- ----- C744`38 [LIFFOPD A. FORKERT $2.200.75 CONTRACTOR 3-28R 074639 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $2.050.18 COMPRESSOR C74690 FRASER CORPORATION .$241.052.04 - -- -- CONTRACTOR PW-141- -- 074641 FREDERICK PUMP A ENGINEERING $525.05 PUMP C74E42 FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY. INC. $30.00 LAB ANALYSIS u � 074E43 GANAHL LUMBER CO. S972.46 LUMBER ------ ------- ------- --- , 174.44 GATES FIBERGLASS INSIALLF'RS S289.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR uL C74645 GATEWAY CONFUTER 3169.34 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 074646 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S646.37 TELEPHONE --- - -------- - „ 1174647 HACH COMPANY $311.31 LAB SUPPLIES 074648 GEORGE T. HALL CO. 0323.97 VALVE 074149 HALSTED S HOGGAN. INC. $401.62 PUMP PARTS -- 274i50 HASTY ALIGNMENT S05.15 TRUCK REPAIR E1 "7401 W.C. HFNDRIL B CO.. INC. 5297.52 RUBBER PRODUCTS )71652- HOE^BIGCR C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. $36.57 VALVE - 174653 HOPPER SHOP EQUIP SALES INC. 037.38 TRUCK PARTSI. 1746E54 POR120H CONCRETE SRV $332.50 CONCRETE DRILLING DOE P74655 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $295.99 PAINT SUPPLIES -74056 CITY OF HUNTINGTON PLACH 3359.45 WATER USEAGE Ip P74E57 HUhTIN:TON REACH PUBLCF STAMP $15.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES I'I `174658 HUNTINCION SUFTLY 136.78 HARDWARE 111I11 ■! I: 1 FUND NO 91°° - JT OISI WORKING [eF11eL PROCESSING DATE 9/23/05 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP 43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID G5/29/85 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 074659 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHYINN CYCL $66.71 -- - BICYCLE PARTS - - ---------------- " 074666 HURLEY ELECTRONICS. INC. $1415.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074661 INNAC S68.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES 074662 1 T TRANSPORTATION 91r736d10 -..-_...__.__--_._-_VAGOUM TRUCKING 074663 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL CO. $14.000.06 FERRIC CHLORIDE 074664 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $49.33 HARDWARE n 074665 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE S61.06 - - -- _- -----OFFICE SUPPLIES ------ ------------ 074666 THE JAMITOR-S SHOPPE $1,222.92 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES . CO.^74667 HELCO SALES L ENGINEERING 629424 SAND BLASTER PARTS ' n D74668 KING BEARING. INC. - $1,562.16-----------BEARINGS------- " 074669 KIRBY PUMP 0 MACHINE MORNS $1,720.84 PUMP PARTS 074674 KLEEN-LINE CORE $72.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES u 074671 L.B.W.S.. INC. $243.44 WELDING SUPPLIER ---=---------- - " 074672 LAURSEN COLOR LAB $224.99 FILM PROCESSING 074673 LEEDS f NORTHRUP $1,990.94 OXYGEN ANALYZER m C74679 LEFF f MASON $1,137.80 --- -MEXIG/W RADIO-INTERFERENO X 674673 LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS. INC. $4.466.49 ELECTRIEAL %UP-LIFS CZ 074676 LIMITORQUE CORP. $1.966.14 FLErTRICAI. EVIPNENT "--' 074677 LUSTRE-CAL - $175.11 --- SAFETR. SUPPLIES--- r 074678 A.J. LYNCH CO. $513.33 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 074680 RARV AC ELECTRONICS $48.71 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C") 074681 RAY MA iCHLE - - BL364.G0-- LANDSGARTS 074612 MATT - COLOR. INC. $1,063.28 PUMP CHLOR W D74683 MCKESS ON CHEMICAL CAL CO. f1$105.45 HARDWARE RIC ACID ' ON F83 NC MAST FR-C ARR SVPPIT Co. 3105.95 - � - HARDWARE - '------------- . 074684 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER $6.01) WATER USEAGE 0746AS MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. S2410.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES 0746G6 NITA WEIGLE NURSERY. LTD. $239.60 LANDSCAPING --------- --- 074687 J. ARTHUR MOORE, CA. INC. $165.15 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 07468A MOTOROLA. INC. $613.74 COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 074689 NATIONAL FILTER MEDIA CORP. f53.36 FREIGHT CHARGE -- P746O0 NATIONAL LUMBER f292.92 HARDWARE 6746.1 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $4,000.00 OIL SPILL CLEANUP/DISPOSAL 074692 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $25.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION .. .. ....... ...._. . -- 074191 NEW ENGLAND INSTRUMENT CO. S615.56 ELECTRICAL SIIPPIIEt 074694 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH S9.RO WATER USEAGE 974695 NORSKOG ELECTRIC VEHICLES $141.14 FLECTRIC CART PARTS 074696 NUEVO CAMINO CONSTPUCTION F76.221.54 CONTRACTOR 2-In-IA 474697 NUPATIC ENGINEERING $341.22 COMPRESSOR 074698 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL COPP. $7.631.06 CAUSTIC SODA D74699 OCCIDENTAL COLLLGE-CASHIER $570.00 OCPAN MONITORING } 074736 OCEAN SALT CO.. INC. $661.44 SAIT �u 074701 OLYMPIC CHFNICAL CO. f31.630.07 CHLOR I NF 07470? OPANLF VALVE, L FITTING CO. $129.12 PIPE SIIPPI IEt L 1.74'103 OFVGrN SERVICE $221.42 OXYGEN I :.74764 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 110.513.39 RFIMRURtE WORKERS IMP. INIURANCE FUND FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WOPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/23/85 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 -- --- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/29/85 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 070705 PMC PRINTING $42.40 PRINTINn 1174746 PTO SALES $94.38 TRUCK PARTS 274707 PACIFIC SAFETY FOUIPKENT CO. f185.83 SAFETY SIIPPIIER 9747d8 PACIFIC BELL 9617.10 - TELEPHONQ- - --'----- -- 074709 PARTS UNLIMITED $617.34 TRUCK PARTS 074710 PASCAL 6 LUDWIG, INC. 119.361:70 CONTRACTOR 14-022 074711 PEARSONS LAWNMOWER CENTER $173.67 - - --;LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES--- ----------- --- 974712 PEP BOYS $466.13 BICYCLES 974713 THE PER91N - ELMER CORP. 560.12 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074714 PENRIL DATA COMMUNICATIONS CDR $150.00 _._.._._ . .. .. .__...._- ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 674715 POSTMASTER $2.000.00 POSTAGE 074716 PRECISION GASKET $152.38 PIPE SUPPLIES 679717 MIKE PRLICH 1 SONS f73.537.65 - - ....__.___._GTMITRACTOR 3-2RR 079718 THE REGISTER $388.60 LEGAL AOVERTISINP 074719 RICHARG4S HYDRAULICS $153.80 HYDRAULIC REPAIR m 074720 RICOH CORP f329.28-----------CAPIFR LEASE yC 074721 RORDINS f MYERS INC. $2,104.89 PUMP PARTS 2 674722 BONES AUTO TRIM $307.20 TRUCK REPAIR 074723 BOB ROSS ._-f 934.00 - ---- ----------TRAVEL-EXPENSE/ASST:-LAB-DIRECTOVASSESMENT-CENTE x 074724 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $1,389.66 PRINTING :74725 SANTA ANA DODGE 152.19 TRUCK PRATT 974726 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS _ 5717.10 --- --ELEGTRIGAk-REPAIR n 074727 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $245.60 TIIOLS 674720 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY ART. DISTRICT 126.00 PURLIrATION 0 T4729 SOU THCRN CALIF. EDISON CO. $81.824.21 - - POWFR- - -- -------- -- 474730 ° SO. CAL. GAS CO. $27.287.77 NATURAL PAS 074731 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $32.419.11 nIESEL FUEL 071732 SOUTHWEST FLEXIBLE SEVER EQUIP $288.68 ._ ....._.BPUMPOTTLED PARTS.._..._._- - x 074734 STARKLET TS DRINKING WATER f1$350.00 BOTTLED WRIER 074735 STATION PEST CONTROL 3$42.71 PEST CONTROL n STEEL 0 STATION STEEL f92.71 7473 SUMMIT STEEL . PIPE SUPPI TES 074737 THE SUPPLIERS .36 TOOLS ^74738 UR U $$112N X. THONFSON 15050.0000 REFUND USECHARGE OVERPAYMENT--- - --- 07.739 THOMPSON LACQUER CO. $2,169.08. PAINT SUPPLIES 074740 CHANNON C. TIA $22.55 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE d74741 TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL. INC. 5206.01 ENGINE PARTS - - - 074742 TRANS MERIDIAN INC. $2.303.70 CAUSTIC SODA d71743 TRAVCL TRAVEL S429.00 AIR FARE C74744 J. S L. TRAVERS INC. $696.30 MELDING SUPPLIES - -- C74745 TRUCK 9 AUTO SUPPLY INC. 1822.33 TRUCK PARTS C74746 J.G. TUCKER R SON. INC. $1.345.88 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �y 074747 THE UNISOURCE CORE. f3.343.UR OFFICE SUPPLIES 1747AR UNITED. PAP.CFL SFAVICT 539.85 DELIVERY SERVICE C74749 UNTTEG STATES :,AFE DEPOSIT CO SIO.90 DELIVERY OF COMPUTER DISC PACKS r79750 UNIVLRSITY ASSOCIATES, INC 566.67 PUBLICATION FUND NO 919? - JT DIST WCBNING CAPITAL 1\ PROCESSING DATE 5/23/85 PAGE 5 RFPORT NUMBER AP43 - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/29/85 VARPANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 074751 UNLIMITED SUPPLY G EGUIPMENT S497.14 - TOOLS - - -------------- - --- 474752 VVR SCIENTIFIC $1.875.53 LAB SUPPLIES 074753 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. S4,072.17 PIPE SUPPLIES 074754 VANIER GRAPHICS $346.23 -- - - - --PRINTING - ---- ;r 074755 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES, INC. $700.30 CONTRACTOR P2-23-6 074756 WE TRY HARDER, INC. S5,531.70 AUTOMOBILE 074757 VESCO 5139.92 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES-------------- -- -----r P74758 WILSON FORD SALES 9328.55 TRUCK PARTS 974759 VITCG SCIENTIFIC 539.56 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074760 ROURKE S WOODRUFF $13,794.08 -------- - -- - -LEGAL-SERVICES- , 074761 XEROX CORP. $4.233.13 COPIER LEASE 074762 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES $980.53 VALVE ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/29/85 S1.959.332.23 r F73 _...-------- x SUMMARY AMOUNT j) 01 OPER FUND $ 640.50 LJl Y2 OPER FUND 794.42 r /2 ACO FUND 212.68 k2 F/R FUND 76.393.90 F3 OPER FUND 674.51 03 ACO FUND 78.492.27 - - - - -_- - --"- --- r 15 OPER FUND 4.708.31 /6'OPER FUND 7.38 F7 OPER FUND 4.259.10 - - - - - - --- ---- F7 F/K FUND 919,141.44 /II OPEN FUND 5,736.69 1596 OPER FUND - 7.177.00 _-..._.._.._ ._.. r F697 OPER FUND 37.82 JT OPER FUND . 256,430.49 CORE 524.922.42 - SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 11,693.89 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 66.009.41 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 5/29/85 $1,959,332.23 Frh I" ` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 6 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING June 25, 1985 - 4:15 P.M. Newport Beach City Hall - Council Conference Room 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of June 12, 1985, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Newport Beach City Hall Council Conference Room. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:15 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. District 5 DIRECTORS PRESENT: Evelyn Hart, Philip Maurer DIRECTORS ABSENT: Roger Stanton District 6 DIRECTORS PRESENT: James Wahner, Ruthelyn Plummer DIRECTORS ABSENT: Roger Stanton STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes, William H. Butler OTHERS: Suzanne Atkins, General Counsel, Don Griffin, Duane Flatten DISTRICTS 5 & 6 The Deputy Chief Engineer reviewed the Staff Report on the status of status of the rehabilitation program for rehabilitation of the Districts' the Districts 5 and 6 jointly owned trunk sewer system and the Master sewer system in Pacific Coast Highway Plans of facilities to serve the from the Upper Bay Crossing to Treatment Districts Plant No. 2. This system drains the lower portion of District No. 6 and all of District No. 5. The major effort since the program commenced has been the restoration of one of the two barrels of the Coast Highway Force Main all the way from the Upper Bay Crossing to Treatment Plant No. 2. Once that is completed, the second barrel will be restored. One barrel has been completed from the Upper Bay Crossing westerly to the Arches. A portion from Plant No. 2 to a point approximately one-half mile easterly has been completed and a contract from that point easterly to Bitter Point Pump Station has been bid and is scheduled to be awarded at the regular July Board meeting. The remaining link in the first barrel, from Bitter Point Pump Station easterly to the Arches, is under design and should be constructed within one year. -1- 6/25/85 '- J Mr. Dawes then reviewed the plan to evaluate the condition of the District No. 5 sewer in Balboa Peninsula and the facilities planned to serve the area down-coast of the City of Newport Beach which annexed to District No. 5 several years ago. District's staff, along with representatives of the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company, the property owner, have cooperated for several years in the master planning of facilities to serve the down-coast area. The Irvine Company has indicated that they are currently in the process of revising their development plans for this area. The District 5 Board has established a separate zone for the area and set a connection fee schedule to pay for the facilities to serve the down-coast area. Staff then reviewed the master planned facilities to serve the upper portion of District No. 6. The major project is the Fairview-Gisler Relief Trunk that will be built in conjunction with District No. 7 and proposed District No. 14. The Deputy Chief Engineer also reviewed the proposed construction schedules for the rehabilitation projects and master planned facilities and advised the Directors that staff was working closely with the City of Newport Beach and the Costa Mesa Sanitary District in coordinating the respective programs. DISTRICTS 5 6 6 Staff reported that Districts Nos. 5 and Review of long-range financial 6 had previously adopted long-range program and preliminary 1985-86 financial programs that include Budgets supplemental user fees to make up the shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and provide needed additional financing for both operations, to cover higher costs of advanced treatment and disposal imposed by federal and state authorities, and major rehabilitation work on Districts collection and transportation system. The program also includes connection fees to finance facilities expansion. District No. 5 adopted its long-range financial program in 1981 and District No. 6 in 1983. �.) During the public hearings held to present the proposed user fee program to the Districts' constituencies, the public was advised that the initial user fee schedule was expected to increase substantially in the second year of the program to cover rising costs, and then remain at that level for several years. However, the Districts have been able to delay any increase in the supplemental user fees since their inception due to a significant decline in inflation rates, receipt of favorable bids on various District and joint works construction and rehabilitation projects and delays in various major plant projects, all of which have reduced District expenditures well below budgeted levels. Further, due to the turnaround in economic conditions in the last year or two, the District's tax base has increased because of development to the point where the projected ad valorem tax operating revenues (share of the property tax allocation under Proposition 13) now appears to place the Districts in a financial position wherein they will not have to increase the user fees in 1985-86 and, in all likelihood, can hold the current fee schedule, as follows, beyond the next fiscal year: V -2- fi/25/85 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 User Fee Schedule SINGLE UNIT PARCELS Connected Meter Size 1982-83 Annual Fee V or less $ 26.40 ly" 52.50 2" 105.00 3" 210.00 4" 420.00 6" 840.00 S. 1,680.00 If a parcel contains more than one water meter, then the charge applicable to each meter shall be added together, and the sum levied against the parcel. MULTI-UNIT PARCELS Per Unit 15.85 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 User Fee Schedule Class of Basis of 1983-84 Minimum Annual User Charge Annual Rate Charge per Unit Single-Family Charge per $ 26.40 $ 26.40 Dwellings dwelling unit Multi-Family Charge per 15.85 15.85 Dwellings/Mobile dwelling unit Homes Commercial/ Charge per 1000 18.90 18.90 Industrial/Other square feet of building In the event proposed new County Sanitation District No. 14 is formed, it would have a favorable financial impact on the Districts. However, the impact of District No. 14 is not reflected in the proposed budgets inasmuch as the District is yet to be formed. Staff then reviewed the draft 1985-86 Districts 5 and 6 budgets and the cash flow projections which had been updated to reflect the most recent estimates. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of v Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:00 p.m., June 27, 1985 for a joint meeting with SAWPA. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:35 p.m. , June 25, 1985. -3- 6/25/85 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 he adjourned to 7:00 p.m. , June 27, 1985 for a joint meeting with SAWBA. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 5:35 p.m. , June 25, 1985. Sec[eta[y' 9 of Dii County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California -4- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 51 6, 71 11, AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING ON JUNE 27, 1935 P~1tAT7pN y `Sa<s L95� 1 NGE COV,� ADMINISTRA= OFFICES 10844 ELT-IS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL An adjourned regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Noe. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, was held on June 27, 1985 at 7:00 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the call was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Noe. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 13 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman Or= Crank x Ronald B. Haesterey, Chairman pro tem _Donald J. Saltarelll x Dan Driest Robert Luxembourger a Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 2: z Suck Catlin, Chairman _Chris Warty a Richard Buck, Chairman pro tam _George Ziegler x Sam Cooper _Carney Nelson x Dan Driest Robert Luxembourger x Carol Hawanami _Wayne Silzel a Willies D. Mahoney _Dorothy Wedel x James Neal _George Scott x Bob Perry _Norman Culver x Dan Roth E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. x Don Smith _Gene Beyer a Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder x Gene Wisner _Michael J. Beverage DISTRICT NO. 3: x Don Roth, Chairman _H. Llewellyn Overholt x Cacrey Nelson, Chairman pro tam Sam Cooper Ruth Bailey =John Thomas Oscar Brownell x Joyce Risner -7 Buck Catlin Chris Marty Norman x Norn Culver _Bob Perry Don Griffin _James T. Jarrell x Dan Griaet Robert Luxembourger a William D. Mahoney _Dorothy Wedel —x­James Neal George Scott x Richard Olson _Bruce Finlayson x Richard Partin _John Hanel a7 Richard Polls _Norma Seidel _A__Sal Sapien _Jean Siriani a Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder x Charles Sylvia _Anthony Selvaggi DISTRICT NO. S: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman _John Cox, Jr. x Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tam _John Cox, Jr. e Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 6: x Jewess Wabner, Chairman James B. Gallacher z Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tam _John Cox, Jr. a Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don Smith, Chairman _Gene Beyer a David Sills, Chalrmen pro tam _Sally Anne Miller z Richard Edgar Donald J. Saltarelli x Dan Griaet _Robert Luxembourger x Philip Maurer John Cox, Jr. a Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder z James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: a Ruth Bailey, Chairman _Robert P. Mandic, Jr. a Roger Stanton, Chairman pro tem _Harriett Wieder x John Thomas _Ruth Finley DISTRICT NO. 13: x Don Smith, Chairman Gene Beyer x Sam Cooper, Chairmen pro tee, _Carney Nelson — _Michael J. Beverage Gene Wisner x Don Roth H. Llewellyn Overholt a Roger Stanton _Harriet Wieder -2- 6/27/85 r, STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Blake Anderson, Bill Butler, Penny Kyle, Richard von Langan, Gary Streed, Corinne Clawson, Bob Ooten �.,✓ SAWPA REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: Joe Aklufi, Howard A. Hicks, Wayne H. Holcomb, Theo Nowak, Dwight French, J. Andrew Schlange, Jennifer Ducleth OTHERS PRESENT: Suzanne Atkins, General Counsel, Ray Lewis, Scott Morgan, Darrel Cohoon, Bill Dendy, Don Martinson, Dennis M. Reid, James Anderson x x x x x x x x x x x x x DISTRICT 11 This being the 27th day of June, 1985, Adiour nment of meeting by Secretary at 7:00 p.m., being the time and place for an Adjourned Regular Meeting of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District No. 11 was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 s 13 The Joint Chairman stated that the Review of history and background of purpose of this joint workshop with the regional Santa Ana River Inter- Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority ceptor (SARI) sewerage system in (SAWPA) was to review the history the management and protection of and background information on the role the upper and lower underground of regional sewerage service in the basin fresh water supplies management and protection of the Santa Ana River underground fresh water supplies. He introduced Mr. Andrew Schlange, SAWPA General Manager, and Mr. James Anderson, Executive Officer of the Santa Ana Region of the California Water Quality Control Board who presented an overview as summarized below. In the late 1960's and early 1970's water and wastewater officials in Orange and Riverside/San Bernardino Counties cooperated closely in initiating a plan to manage the Santa Ana River underground fresh water supplies for the three-county area. The backbone of this groundwater protection plan is the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) system. In 1972 the Sanitation Districts entered into agreements with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) to provide a means whereby wastewater from Upper Santa Ana River Basin dischargers that would be harmful to the groundwater supply of both the upper (Riverside/San Bernardino Counties) and lower (Orange County) basin can be transported, through a closed system, to the Sanitation Districts' treatment and disposal facilities. The agreements provide for 30 MGD capacity rights for the upper Santa Ana River Basin interests in the District No. 2 Santa Ana River Interceptor and the now existing and future treatment and disposal facilities of the Joint Sanitation Districts. Litigation of water use and rights has a long history within the Santa Ana River system. Early judgments and agreements preceding 1960 were primarily concerned with quantity of water, V -3- 6/27/85 During the mid 1960's, Orange County Water District filed a lawsuit entitled, "Orange County Water District vs. City of Chino, at al". This complaint involved several thousand defendants in Riverside and San BernardinoCounties and hundreds of cross-defendents in Orange County. The defendants and cross-defendants included substantially all water users within the Santa Ana Watershed. In 1969 a stipulated judgment was entered in the case which provided a physical solution by allocation of obligation and rights to serve the best interests of all water users in the watershed. Orange County Water District, Chino Basin Municipal Water District, Western Municipal Water District and San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District were deemed to have the power and financial resources to implement the physical solution. The stipulated judgment provided for dismissal of all defendants and cross-defendants except for the four districts, providing certain parties stipulated to cooperate and support the physical solution. The physical solution provided that water users in the Orange County area have rights, as against all upper basin users, to receive an annual average supply of 42,000 acre feet of base flow at Prado Dam, together with the right to all storm flow reaching the dam. Lower basin users may make full conservation use of Prado Dam and reservoir subject to flood control use. Water users in the upper basin have the right to pump, extract, conserve, store and use all surface and groundwater supplies within the upper area, providing lower area entitlement is met. The judgment further provided for adjustment to base flow (that portion of total surface flow passing a point of measurement, which remains after deduction of storm flow) based on water quality considerations. As a result of the litigation and stipulated judgment to ensure the supply of good quality water to Orange County, the four remaining defendants and cross-defendants (CBMWD, WMWD, SBVMWD and OCWD) determined that planning the use of water supplies in the watershed would be beneficial to all users. SAWPA, the Planning Agency, was formed in 1968 as a joint exercise of powers agency. Its members were the four water districts who have the primary responsibility of managing, preserving and protecting the groundwater supplies in the Santa Ana Basin. These districts formed.SAWPA because they foresaw a threat to the water supplies that is larger than any one of the districts could cope with alone - the threat of pollution. They foresaw the possibility that pollution by mineral salts and other pollutants could pose a greater danger to the basin than even overdraft. They suspected that if programs and projects were not implemented to control this problem, there could be a gradual accumulation of pollutants in the basins that would be almost impossible to clean up, causing a total loss of the usefulness and value of the basins. SAWPA's first task was to characterize the problem and make projections of what the future might hold if nothing were done. To aid in this effort, sophisticated mathematical models of the basins were used. The projections supported the fears of the water districts. It was clear that something had to be done. As a next step, SAWPA, in the early 1970's, developed a long-range plan for the entire Santa Ana Watershed. The plan included both regulatory programs and `, projects. The regulatory portion was recommended to the Regional Water Quality -4- 6/27/8s Control Board and has largely been adopted in the form of standards by that agency. The projects include some to be implemented by the individual districts, some by the State of California, some by the Metropolitan Water District and some by SAWPA. In total, they will result in a much safer water supply in the long term. That plan, completed in 1972, identified twelve major project areas of need. Of the identified areas, four were such that their impact overlapped more than one member district. Those four projects are: 1. Mineral and Toxicant Control - Export to the Ocean. Construction of 'a pipeline facility (Santa Ana River Interceptor - SARI) from the Pacific Ocean to upper watershed districts for the removal of poor quality wastewater. This facility is the single most crucial element in achieving water quality management in the watershed. Primary uses of the SARI are: a. Removal of poor quality rising water in the Chino III, Temescal and Arlington Basins b. Removal of Desalter brine C. Removal of agricultural return water from areas tributary to the Arlington basin and dairy areas of Chino/Riverside d. Removal of municipal and industrial wastewater high in TDS 2. Reduction of Salt added by Agriculture. The preparation of specific plans and facilities for limiting salt added by agriculture are to be determined by future feasibility level studies. 3. Provision of Good Quality Water to Corona, Norco and Rome Gardens. The provision of water for domestic use meeting the delivered (3-c plan) quality objective designed to reduce quality related consumer cost and wastewater disposal. This program includes construction of facilities to serve treated State Water Project water and water from the Bunker Rill Basin. 4. Prevention of Poor Quality Rising Water from Comingling with Good Quality Water in the Santa Ana River. This project was envisioned to provide an economically feasible method of exporting salt from the upper watershed groundwater basins thereby improving the mineral quality of the river water used for replenishment in the lower watershed. In 1974, upon completion of the Planning Agency work program, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority was created and empowered to develop, plan, finance, construct and operate programs and projects related to water quality-control and management, resulting in pollution abatement and protection of the Santa Ana Watershed. The original member districts were Chino Basin Municipal Water District, Western Municipal Water District, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District and Orange County Water District. Eastern Municipal Water District subsequently joined in 1984. -5- 6/27/85 Implementation of these projects required that SAWPA contract with other public agencies. In the case of SARI, in 1972 SAWPA contracted with the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County for Interceptor Treatment and Disposal Capacity in their system. Construction of SARI, again the most critical element of the water quality management plan, was completed to Riverside and Chino in 1983. In addition to implementing the four specific project areas, SAWPA has a coordination role to assure that all of the various parts of the plan are moving ahead. SAWPA's role is recognized by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the State Water Resources Control Board, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and other agencies. In general, it can be accurately said that the Basin Plan for the Santa Ana Basin is the most comprehensive water quality protection program of any river basin in the world, largely because of the active, ongoing interest and participation by the member water districts and SAWPA's affiliation with other agencies such as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Following a review of the projects completed to date by SAWPA toward the overall program objectives and the proposed projects including the Stringfellow pretreatment facility and the interim City of Norco plan and the connection of the California Rehabilitation Center in Corona, the Directors entered into a general discussion with Mr. Schlange and Mr. Anderson of the overall program aimed at protecting the underground basins in both the lower (Orange County) and upper (San Bernardino/Riverside Counties) Santa Ana River Watershed. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Joint Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m. , June 27, 1985. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Joint Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m., June 27, 1985. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Joint Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m. , June 27, 1985. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Joint Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m. , June 27, 1985. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Joint Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m. , June 27, 1985. -6- DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Joint Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m. , June 27, 1985. dad DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Joint Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m. , June 27, 1985. Secretary, Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 U -7- REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN `r JULY 10, 1985 1 ) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION COMMENDING JAMES W. ANDERSON, RETIRING EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE SANTA ANA RWQCB. MANY OF YOU KNOW JIM ANDERSON, THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, WHICH, ALONG WITH EPA, REGULATES OUR ACTIVITIES. MR. ANDERSON RECENTLY ADDRESSED THE BOARDS AT THE SPECIAL MEETING WITH SAWPA. HE HAS BEEN THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE SANTA ANA REGION FOR 12 YEARS AND HAS WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH OUR DISTRICTS TOWARD OUR COMMON GOAL OF WATER QUALITY PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT. MR. ANDERSON HAS BEEN A VERY EFFECTIVE EXECUTIVE OFFICER. HE HAS HAD TO MAKE THE TOUGH DECISIONS, BUT HAS ALWAYS MAINTAINED A PRAGMATIC APPROACH. HIS RETIREMENT WILL BE A GREAT LOSS TO THE STATE PROGRAM AND TO THE CITIZENS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN. I WOULD LIKE TO OFFER A RESOLUTION FOR THE BOARDS ' CONSIDERATION, COMMENDING JIM ANDERSON FOR HIS OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE, AND THE FINE JOB HE HAS DONE AS EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD (COPY OF RESOLUTION No. 85-128 ATTACHED) . `.a 1 2) REQUEST OF IRWD TO MOVE UP DATE FOR CONSIDERATION OF FINAL EIR ON PROPOSED FORMATION OF DISTRICT No. 14. l.✓ THE DIRECTORS WILL RECALL THAT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT ON THE PROPOSED FORMATION OF DISTRICT No. 14 IN THE IRVINE AREA WAS HELD AT THE JUNE 12TH MEETING. AT THAT TIME, FOLLOWING A REVIEW OF THE DRAFT EIR, THE BOARDS DIRECTED THE CONSULTANT TO PREPARE THE FINAL EIR AT THE CLOSE OF THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ON JUNE 27TH, AND TO SUBMIT THE FINAL EIR FOR THE BOARDS' CONSIDERATION AT THE REGULAR MEETING SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 14TH. INCLUDED IN YOUR AGENDA FOLDER TONIGHT IS A LETTER FROM THE IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT REQUESTING THAT THE BOARDS CONSIDER EXPEDITING THE SCHEDULE FOR ADOPTION AND CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL EIR, TO ACCOMMODATE THEIR SALE OF BONDS IN AUGUST TO PROVIDE FOR V FINANCING DISTRICT No. 14 ' s INITIAL CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS. IRWD HAS REQUESTED THAT THE BOARDS MEET A WEEK FROM TONIGHT, ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 17TH, TO CONSIDER THE FINAL EIR. THE CONSULTANT ADVISES US THAT THE FINAL EIR COULD BE COMPLETED BY MONDAY, JULY 15TH WHICH, WITH THE LOGISTICS OF DISTRIBUTION, WOULD NOT LEAVE MUCH TIME FOR THE DIRECTORS TO REVIEW THE DOCUMENT PRIOR TO THE 17TH. THEREFORE, I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT IF THE BOARDS WISH TO ACCOMMODATE IRWD' S REQUEST, PERHAPS A BETTER DATE WOULD BE WEDNESDAY, JULY 24TH, WHICH IRWD SAYS IS THE LAST DATE THAT WOULD ALLOW THEM TIME TO OBTAIN THE NECESSARY APPROVALS TO EFFECT THE BOND SALE IN AUGUST. - CONTINUED - 2 . IF THAT IS AGREEABLE TO THE DIRECTORS, THEN THE ONLY ACTION REQUIRED TONIGHT WOULD BE AT THE END OF THE MEETING FOR EACH BOARD �.. TO ADJOURN TO 7:30 P.M. WEDNESDAY, JULY 24TH TO CONSIDER THE FINAL EIR ON THE PROPOSED FORMATION OF DISTRICT No. 14 . THE EXCEPTION WOULD BE DISTRICT No. I WHICH HAS A MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 18TH. DISTRICT No. 1 WOULD ADJOURN TONIGHT TO JULY 18TH AND ON THE 18TH THEN ADJOURN TO THE 24TH. ASK FOR CONCENSUS ON IRWD' S REQUEST (THERE IS A REPRESENTATIVE OF IRWD IN ATTENDANCE THAT COULD ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS RELATIVE TO THEIR REQUEST) . 3) UPCOMING MEETINGS. ANNOUNCE/CALL THE FOLLOWING OTHER MEETINGS: A) DISTRICT NO. I PUBLIC HEARING - THURSDAY, JULY 18TH AT r./ 7:30 P.M. - SANTA ANA CITY HALL. B) FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING - TUESDAY, JULY 23RD AT 5:00 P.M. C) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - WEDNESDAY, JULY 24TH AT 5:30 P.M. __INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND: USES SAM COOPER AND OR OR RICHARD BUCK NORMAN CULVER 3 RESOLUTION NO. 85-128 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS -NOS. 2 3 5 6 7 Ir AND 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALL RNIA COMMENDING AMES W. ANDERSON FOR HIS OUTSTANDING CONTR BUTTON AND DEDICATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE UPON HIS RETIREMENT AS EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, SANTA ANA REGION xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WHEREAS, James W. Anderson, Executive Officer of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, .has announced his retirement after 12 years of service; and, WHEREAS, James W. Anderson, as Executive Officer of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, has been responsible for the regulation of water quality activities in the Santa Ana River Basin; and, WHEREAS, James W. Anderson, during his tenure of office: Has exhibited the highest standards of professional and ethical conduct and has set an outstanding example for all public officials; and, Has devoted many hours and much energy to the improvement of water quality in the Santa Ana River Basin; and, Has made a significant contribution toward effective and rational water �.e quality and environmental management; and, Has worked closely with the County Sanitation Districts toward our common goal of protecting and enhancing water quality; and Has been a fair and pleasant person with whom to work and a good friend of all the people working with the County Sanitation Districts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED: That the Directors and staff of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County hereby commend and express to James W. Anderson their sincere and honest appreciation for his dedicated and meritorious public service and conscientious effort expended on behalf of the citizens of Orange County and the Santa Ana River Basin. PASSED AND ADOPTED by unanimous acclamation at a regular meeting of said Boards on the loth day of July, 1985. Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California Joint Chairman Secretary - RE: AGENDA ITEM #7(A) Ir 1 e1 pr 4 `ry r/ �[1tr�5t m1 EtEf l.t 11. 1 T I� , ER .N l RI 1 P.O. Box O-1 . 18802 Bardeen Ave • Irvine. Calif, 92716-6025 p14;833-1223 July 8, 1985 0162Y7/85 FA 20305 Mr. Wayne Sylvester General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 SUBJECT: FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 EIR Dear Mr. Sylvester: Thank you for your District's efforts to meet a schedule such that the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWO) can continue its proposed bond sale during the week of August 26, 1985 in order to finance the subject formation. In order to sell the bonds in August, it is imperative that the IRWD receive approval from the State Treasurer's District Securities Advisory Commission (DSAC) prior to the sale date. To obtain DSAC approval , the 30 day statute of limitation period must run out which means the EIR must have final approval by the CSDOC Board on or before July 24, 1985. Please consider this letter as a request for your Board to take final action on the subject EIR during a special meeting to be held on July 17, 1985. This would allow the 30 day period to end on August 16, 1985 which would provide time for the DSAC approval . I understand that the EIR consultant has requested a change order due to prior changes in the scope of work. Perhaps you.could inquire if meeting this revised schedule would be included in the aforementioned request. Thank you for your cooperation in scheduling this final action and enabling IRWD to meet its commitments for the District formation. Sincerely, IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT Road E. hgineer*ng Di ec or ond Planning RE Y:If MEETING DATE July 1Q. 1985 TIME-2e30 P.m.DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,T,11 G 13__ Uf$TTaILT J018T BOARDS S CRANK). . ... ...HANSON. . .. . ._1� —_ (THOMAS/MANDIC)..BAILEY.. . . . .y_,_ SALTARELLI ). .HOESTEREY. . .y XISNER), . . BEVERAGE....yC LU%EMBppURGERS.GR[SET.. .. . .J,� _ BROXNELLLf. . .... .RISHER.. . . ... _ NIEDER). . . ...STAMTOM. . . . .. _Q,,, ZIEGLER). . . BUCK. . .... . .y (MC CLANAHAN5. . . .t*%44. . . . . .JG _ v DISTRICT 2 (NELSON). . . ......COOPER... . . .yG (PERRY). . . . ......CU.VER. . .. . . MC CLANAHAM)..SAiCYM.....JL {SALTARELLI). .... .EDGAR. ......v --- ZIEGLER).. .. .6BUCK....... ._1G (`JARRELL) ..GRIFFIN....._ NELSON)..... .000PER.... . .. ,C >L_ _ LU%EMBOURGER)—GRISET........L LU%EABOURGER).GRISET..... ,_� _� _ CRANK)). . .. . . . . .HANSON...... S ILZE``) . ... . .KANANAMI. . . .SC V _ _ CO%)........ ... HART........... _ NEDEL)..... ...MAHONEY.... .JC _ _ SALTAR€LLI).. .. .HOESTEREY..._,,G SCOTT) .. . . .NEAL.... .. .._� _ SIL EZE 1 .. . . . .. .KAWANAMI....�G _ 0 ERMOLTI... . .ROTH. . ...... COX)...:.... . .. .MAURER.♦..... TH XI EDERI.EY ER . . . , ..STANTON..... COOPERS.. � � � � ���NELSON....... BEVERAGEj. . ...NI SHER...... FI NL AYSQNS... .. .OLSON......._,I,� KANEL)) ... PART IN......�� _ DISTRICT 3 CU.VER)...... .. .PERRY....... �� COX)......... .. .PLUMMER....._� _ (OVERNOI. .... ..ROTH.NELSON, ..::::: ......� OVERHOLTCOLLINSJ .......ROTH......... (((COOPER). . ..BAILEY.. . ...�G OVERHOLT...... . .ROTH......... TXOI(AS)) 12 BAILEY......yi SIRIAN ....... ..OAM{N....... _ ME �T�q�`.4U..iAi6VIEt .. .JG MILLER... ..SILLS MITH... . ..._IL _ ((PERRY). •, CULVER.. . . . .�L BEYER SMITH....... (JARRELL S... . �.GRIFFI N.. .. .yG NIEDERS.�..... ..STANTON..... (LU%EMO@OURGER).GRISET... . . .�L � _ SELVAGGI )..... ..SYLVIA.. .... _ NEDEL).. .. . . ..MAHONEY. , . . .�_ FINLEY).... . . . . THOMAS.... SCOTT 7) NEAL.... . .. ._yG GREEN/GAILACHERSNAHNER......_yC, .. ) F INEL).... ... .OLSON..... . ..JL _� (BEVERAGE .. . ...NISNER.. .. ..J< KANEL) ..PART)N... ...JG _ COLLINS .. . ..S . RISHE BRONNEI)......RISNER.. .. ... _ S IRIANI)).. ....STANTO . . ...J� N IEDER ....STANTON. . , .. 2 _ `✓ SELVAGGIf.... .SYLVIA.. ....JG V STAFF. DISTRICT 5 SYLVESTER...,J- CLARKE. .....✓ (CO%�... ...... .NART. ... .... ✓ J = DAWES....... �G (CO% ..t. .MAURER. .....�� ANDERSON. ...� (NIEDERS.. .... .STANTON. . .. .�- $, BUTLER....... BROWN. .. .....L DISTRICT 6 BAKER. .. KYLE.. ...... GALLLACHER). . . .WARNER. ..... YOUNG. . .. ..._ COX) PLUMMER.... . VON LARGER JC NIEDERS.......STANTON.. ... NINSOR...... STREED.. . ... ✓ DISTRICT 7 CLAWSON...... (BEYER)'... ..SMITH. . . .... OTHERS: WOODRUFF... .�G MILLERS. . . ...SILLS.... ...� ATKINS. . . . . .J� SALTARELLI). .EDGAR.. , , , , .� HOHENER, , , . ._ LU%EEMBOURGER).GRISET. . . .. ._ HOWARD.. ....✓ COX) MAURER. . . .. . ✓ HUNT. . . . . .. . igl VIED ER). . . . . . .STANTON. . .. .-LC KEITH.. . ... . GREEN)... . . . . .XAXNER. . ... .JG KNOPF... . .. ..JG LE BLANC...._ DISTRICT 11 LINDSTROM.. ., LYNCH.. . . .. .__ JMANDIC)..... ..BAILEY...... ✓ MARTINSON..._ X EDER).. ....STANTON.... .� _ PEARCE. ..... FINL EY)). .. ....THOMAS..... . ml %41RBM�F• 16- DISTRICT 13 og,Q,,_ { .....SMITH. . .....Jb IMEYER) ELSONtr(.. . . ...000PER... ...NISNER).• .... .BEVERAGE... .✓OVERNOLLTS.....ROTH.... . .. . 1► WIEDER).......S TAN TON. . ..._ 7/10/85 ONLY �./ PLEASE SIGN IN - JULY 10, 1985 NAME AGENCY/FIRM �S L I N Ds MoNI P_LrN-i)ST/LO r4-5s''Oc/47a �� N �_ LULU � �j�✓<<n-e_ 2u�/c�� '�I��'►✓i�� QYS1.Gy JULY 10, 1985 JOINT MEETING NOTES Me) - Report of the Joint Chairman (See attached notes.) Chairman Edgar added that this was a very exciting agenda. Staff is recommending approval of the architect for the Administration Building Addition. He said one of the things that was particularly attractive is that we are going to accommodate growth and understand the needs of all of our people in the entire District. This is a milestone to consider. He commented that he was thrilled over considering Engineering-Science to watch over the various projects such as the covers for the primary basins and scrubber systems. He was also very excited over approving the plan for monitoring all of our discharge and entering into an agreement with a consultant to give an objective presentation and detailed analysis to EPA. #7(b) - Report of the General Manager The General Manager commented on a Supplemental Agenda item relative to purchase of pickup trucks awarded to Mission GMC Trucks in February. He reported that the trucks were not delivered on schedule and when we attempted to contact Mission GMC, we were unable to find out any information on them. We contacted the regional center and they informed us that Mission GMC was about to go out of business. The regional center recommended Mike McCarthy Buick 6 GMC and when we contacted them, they agreed to honor the order for the same price. Mr. Sylvester then reported that a firm in District 1, Pima Services, has been having difficulty complying with the Districts' industrial discharge requirements. The staff met with them on Monday, 7/8, for a staff level permit revocation hearing. He stated that it was the staff's judgment that they will not be able to come into compliance in the near future and are, therefore, recommending that the Board establish August 14th as the date for a permit revocation hearing. The General Manager also reported on an item recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. At the last joint Board Meeting the Directors authorized the Fiscal Policy Committee to meet with the insurance broker and based on information he submitted, to place the excess liability insurance coverage for 1985-86. The Committee met and awarded the excess liability coverage in the amounts of $'EBsmillion for $50,133 and $5 million for $20,000. He advised that the broker had called that day and informed us that the original insurer of the second level of coverage for $20,000 would not be able to provide that coverage. They are getting out of the business of liability insurance. The second low bidder's premium for $5 million of coverage was $27,500 which makes the total premium $77,633.00. Staff recommended the change. #7(c) - No report of the General Counsel #8(a) - Election of Joint Chairman Chairman Edgar announced that a few weeks ago he was elected to posts on the Orange County Transportation Commission and Orange County Transit District Boards. He said he had some personal standards and as he started to become involved with the new positions, he had learned that the job is more demanding than he had expected. Therefore, he said he wished to withdraw from nomination for the position of Joint Chairman of the Sanitation Districts and cast a unanimous ballot for Don Griffin as the new Joint Chairman. Motion seconded and unanimously carried. He said he would still be an active member on the 'Sanitation Districts' Board as the past Joint Chairman is still a member of the Executive Committee and he is on the Select Committee to Advise the Staff. Don Griffin thanked Directors for their confidence. Be said Dick works real hard at what he does and does an excellent job and he would like to thank him. v He then promised to do his very best and work hard with the other Directors to continue the leadership of the Districts as it has been in the past. Said he appreciated the kind of effort that Directors put in on behalf of the jobs that are needed. He thanked the staff also and added that the Districts have an excellent staff. #8(b) - Election of Vice Joint Chairman Director Wahner nominated Don Smith for Vice Joint Chairman. Director Hoesterey nominated Director Bob Hanson. Moved nominations be closed. Tom Woodruff then explained the election procedure. The vote is "By District" and each District casts only one ballot. Districts can caucus to determine how they will cast their ballot. Must receive the vote of a majority of the Districts. Don Smith then introduced himself and said he was honored to be nominated. He said he had been on the Board for 18 years. During his years on the City of Council of the City of Orange, he was Mayor for four years and Vice Mayor for six years. Director Hanson then introduced himself and indicated that he had been on the Board for 8 years and Chairman of District No. 1 for five years. (??) He added that he had the time to do the job because he is retired. Ballots were distributed by District and collected. Votes were as follows: District 1 - Hanson District 2 - Smith District 3 - Smith District 5 - Smith District 6 - Smith District 7 - Smith District 11 - Smith District 13 - Smith Director Don Smith was elected Vice Joint Chairman. Mr. Smith thanked Directors and said he would do his utmost for the Districts. #14 (c) - Report re proposed budgets for 1985-86 The Director of Finance briefly reviewed the budget procedure. He reported that the budgets go through a series of reviews by the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and are presented to the Directors to consider. The Joint Works budget includes the JO budget and CORF for the capital construction program. Those budgets were considered and approved by the Boards at the June Board meeting. They were then apportioned to the Districts and are presented in the individual District's budgets. The total budget this year is $250.2 million which is a 13% increase over last year's budget. Our budget is basically revenue driven. We carry certain .� reserves. We did not undertake certain capital projects approved in last year's budget. We anticipated spending $33 million and spent only $16 million so had -2- some carry-over to this year. The projects still remain and will be constructed in the future. This year's budget increased because we did not carry out some of these projects that still need to be completed. Mr. Butler then highlighted some of the major points of the individual District budgets. DISTRICT 1 has adopted a user fee and is holding a public hearing to place that fee on the tax bill for 1985-86. By moving toward a user fee they are headed in the right direction. In Districts 2 and 7 in last year's budget deliberations, the Boards directed staff to take reserve funds in those Districts and pay for the remaining life of the bond issues. Accordingly, in DISTRICTS 2 3 7 we will not levy any taxes to pay for bond retirement. Those Districts are exceptionally financially strong. DISTRICT 3 is in good shape. They will be spending more money this year on capital construction. Staff is proposing that we transfer from capital funds to bond funds to finance its bond retirement for this fiscal year as we have done in Districts 2 and 7. Staff has met with DISTRICTS 5 6 6 over the past couple months. The user fees in Districts 5 and 6 will stay the same. They were adopted in 1981 and 1983, respectively. The major expenditures in those two Districts are for rehabilitation projects in the Coast Highway Trunk Sewer system. DISTRICT 7's major expenditure is on the Von Barman Trunk Sewer. They are in outstanding financial condition. DISTRICT 11 is in good financial shape. Long term they may experience deficits in the operating fund over the next five years. Staff is continuing to evaluate the proposal re District 14 and we have not included any budget items for that District. If and when it is formed, we will come forward with budget documents. The Director of Finance reported that we have evaluated our position with regard to the Gann Initiative limitations. In the case of every District budget, we are well within its limits. District 13 is 100% financed by user fees and is not subject to Gann limits. n.r He then asked if there were any questions. Director Wahner asked about the money coming from IRWD if District 14 is formed. Bill Butler indicated that the agreement with IRWD previously approved by the Boards provides for some capital payments by IRWD. The bond issue that IRWD will use to pay for the capital costs is their buy-in for those capital facilities. The Districts will receive $34 million which will be a significant benefit. The amount that goes to each District varies. Those amounts are not taken into consideration in these budgets. Carol Rawanami questioned a figure in the District 2 Facilities Revolving Fund budget but it was explained that that was just a typographical error and would be corrected. Director Polis asked if District 3's budget included money for payment of claims for manhole damage. Tom Dawes said we have received responses from 7 or 8 cities that were investigated. We believe we have projected for all of these in the budget. Roll calls on budgets. #17 - Report of Select Advisory Committee re ERO Agreement Director Edgar reported on behalf of the Committee. He indicated that the Committee had met and the issue that we are confronted with is that ERO is trying ..,i very diligently to get a permit from San Bernardino County. They went to the Board of Supervisors two weeks ago and they had some objections re doing an EIR. -3- There were some dairy owners that objected. The Board of Supervisors said they needed a focused EIR rather than a Negative Declaration. They are confronted with a more time-consuming schedule now. The Select Committee to Advise the Staff recommends the requested time extension be granted. They are still claiming they are going to have their operation ready by next July lat. They need a permit to yr use the land in San Bernardino first. It was so moved and seconded to approve the time extension to the agreement. Motion carried. Director Hoesterey asked what our fall-back plan was if EKO is not able to do this? Director Edgar replied that there are several alternatives. There is a Japanese firm that is interested or it may be that Bee Canyon may be utilized or the ocean outfall alternative may be used. If everything else fails, we can have a private hauler take our sludge but it is more expensive. Joint Chairman Griffin added that we can't breach our contract with EKO but we are keeping other options open. 419(b) - Verbal report of consultant, K. P. Lindstrom re EIR on Joint Works MP The Chair recognized Kris Lindstrom who addressed the Board. He stated that we have received comments on the Draft EIR from a number of agencies. He listed some of the agencies from whom comments were received. All comments are responded to and addressed in the Final EIR. Of 47 comments, Fountain Valley had 25, Huntington Beach had 3, etc. The Master Plan addressed the 20-year facility needs and the EIR addressed the first increment for the next five years of facilities worth $100 million. It addressed impacts re odor control and air quality. Impacts will be mitigated but but there will still be impacts associated with projects. Growth has been planned for and the Districts will be serving the needs of the communities that they serve. There will be increased traffic congestion and air quality impacts. He said the Directors are acknowledging those by adopting this EIR. There are short-term construction impacts also. There will be long-term resource commitments with the large amount of equipment and materials that will be purchased and installed. Operational impacts will be ongoing associated with operation of facilities and they will be mitigated. Some of the issues are: - Capacities and facilities sizing Fountain Valley had some particular concerns. They had a number of comments re the ultimate configuration the plant is going to be. It is the Districts' goal that with the expansion of facilities and improving new facilities, there will be no increase in impacts on surrounding cities. We hope to reduce impacts by covering facilities and by other major projects to reduce air pollution. There is still a need to define some of the technologies they are being used. The Districts have committed themselves to do pilot testing on some of this equipment and determine the best available. The digester gas we burn here is a major resource. He emphasized that they would be hearing a lot about air quality project in the next few years. The EIR addressed five years. Will be up to 7 mgd additional capacity for v SAWPA. -4- - Air quality We have to comply with the changing rules and regulations of AQMD. There is a need to do modeling to determine the impact of joint works facilities on the communities. Offset analysis determines what the trade-offs are. �.r - Visual impacts Extension of surge tower will be raised 15 feet. We recommended an architect help make the best visual impact and have master plans for landscaping. - Solids disposal Have agreement with ERO for sludge management. - Chemical use Will be increased use of chemicals, particularly iron salts to reduce sulfide emissions and will be a dramatic increase in the use of chlorine. Iron salts are not toxic. Re Mitigation: - Design features, such as sound barriers in the headworks, will be used. Enclosed structures will be used. APC equipment. - Special contract requirements will be in all contracts. - Equipment selection will be part of the design features. There will be special emergency features. - Operations - May have to put on extra staff and will require extra effort to coordinate with contractors. v - Working with Other Agencies - When the landscape plans are developed, they will be reviewed with neighboring cities and citizens. Asked if there were any questions. There were none. -5- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 12 29 32 5, 62 71 119 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JULY 10, 1985 Pp1TATZO& Se`oVolit= Qro 40 y N ORANGE COV ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ET-7 AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Mos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, roe held on July 10, 1985, at 7,30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll "a called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Moe. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 as follows. ws ACTIVE DIItEC10R5 ALTHRNATS DIAEC1k7RS DISTRICT NO. is x Hobert Hanson, Chairman Or® Crank x Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman pro We _Donald J. Saltarelli x Dan Griset Robert Luxembourger ,a-Roger Stanton _Harriett Rieder DISTRICT NO. 2: Buck Catlin, Chairman xMolly McClanahan _1.--Richard Buck, Chairman pro tem George Ziegler xSam Cooper _Caney Nelson x Dan Griset _Robert Luxembourger x Carol Hawanand Wayne Silrel x William 0. Mahoney Dorothy Model -7-Jams Neal George Scott xBob Perry Mormon Culver x Don Both —a. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. x Don Smith _Gene Beyer a Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder x Gene Wisner Michael J. Beverage DISTRICT M. 31 _A__Don Both, Chairman —B. Llewellyn Overholt x Garrey Nelson, Chairman pro tem Sam Cooper x Ruth Bailey John Thomae _Buck Catlin x Molly McClanahan xNorman Culver Bob Perry x Don Griffin James T. Jarrell xDan Driest _Robert Luxembourger x William D. Mahoney Dorothy Model : James Neal George Slott Y Richard Olson Bruce Pinlayson �+,✓ x Richard Partin John Kenai x Richard Polio Dan Collins x Joyce Risner Oscar Brownell SalSaplen x Jean Sirlanl __Pal Roger Stanton Harriett Winder x Charles Sylvia _Anthony Selvaggi DISTRICT M. 5, x Evelyn Hart, Cbairman John Cox, Jr. x Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tem _John Cox, Jr. _A__Roger Stanton _Harriett Wieder DISTRICT NO. 6: x Jesse Rohner, Chairman James B. Gallacher x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem _John Cox, Jr. a Roger Stanton _Harriett Rieder DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don Smith, Chairman Gene Beyer x David Sills, Chairman pro tem _Sally Anne Miller x Richard Bdgar _Donald J. Saltarelll -;'-Dan Griset _Robert Luxembourger x Philip Maurer John Cox, Jr. a Roger Stanton Harriett Wieder i James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: -A-Ruth Bailey, Chairman Robert P. Mandlc, Jr. a Roger Stanton, Chairman pro tem Harriett Wieder x John Thomas _Ruth Finley DISTRICT NO. 13: x Don Smith, Chairman Gene Beyer x Sam Cooper, Chairman pro tem Garrey Nelson x Michael J. Beverage _Gene Wisner x Don Roth H. 'Llewellyn Overholt a Resler Stanton _Harriet Wieder -2- 7/10/85 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Blake Anderson, Bill Butler, Penny Kyle, Richard von Langan, Gary Streed, Corinne Clawson OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Suzanne Atkins, Walt Howard, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf, Kris Lindstrom, Jack Kenney, Helen Edgar, Ron Young, Phil Stone DISTRICTS 2 s 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpts re Board Appointments That the minute excerpts from the following cities re election of mayors*, appointment of alternate Directors and seating new members of the Boards, be, and .. are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) City District(s) Active Director Alternate Director La Palma 3 Richard Polis Dan Collins* Fullerton 2 6 3 Buck Catlin* Molly McClanahan (For 7/10/85 Meeting Only) Seal Beach 3 Joyce A. Risner* Oscar Brownell DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments V Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1985 or the adjourned meeting held June 27, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1985 or the adjourned ; meeting held June 27, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1985 or the adjourned meeting held June 27, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1985 or the adjourned meetings held June 25, 1985 and June 27, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1985 or the adjourned meetings held June 25, 1985 and June 27, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -3- 7/10/85 DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1985 or the adjourned meeting held June 27, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1985 or the adjourned meeting held June 27, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1985 or the adjourned meeting held June 27, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman Adopting resolution of comiendation The Joint Chairman reported that for retiring Executive Officer of Mr. James W. Anderson had announced CEMQCB, James W. Anderson his retirement from the post of Executive Officer of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. The Regional Board, along with the Environmental Protection Agency, regulates the Districts' activities. Mr. Anderson has been the Executive Officer of the Santa Ana Region for 12 years and has worked very closely with our Districts toward our cos n goal of water quality protection and enhancement. The Joint Chairman then introduced Resolution No. 85-128, commending Mr. James Anderson for his outstanding contributions and dedication to public service, and the fine job he has done as Executive Officer of the Regional Water Quality Control Board since 1973; whereupon, adoption of said resolution was seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Approving Request of IRWD to change The Joint Chairman reported that at schedule for adopting Final SIR re the public hearing conducted at the Formation of District No. 14 July 12th meeting on the Draft Environmental Impact Report On Proposed Formation of District No. 14 the Boards directed the consultant to prepare the Final SIR at the close of the public comment period on June 27th and to submit it for the Boards' consideration at the regular meeting scheduled for August 14th. Mr. Edgar then called the Directors' attention to a letter in the Directors' meeting folders from Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) requesting that the Boards consider expediting the schedule for adoption and certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report to accommodate their sale of bonds in August to provide for financing District No. 14's initial capital requirements. -4- 7/10/85 The Joint Chairman suggested that if the Boards wished to accommodate IRWD's request and still allow enough time to review the Final EIR upon its completion, they could adjourn to 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, July 24th, to consider said Final EIR on the Proposed Formation of District No. 14. Following an informal poll, it was determined that the consensus of the Directors was to accommodate the request of IRWD and adjourn to 7:30 p.m. , Wednesday, July 24, 1985, to consider the Final EIR on the Proposed Formation of District No. 14. Following comments on agenda items for hiring an architect for expansion of the administration building, engaging the engineer firm for value design and scheduling of odor control projects, and hiring the firm to conduct the new ocean monitoring programs, Chairman Edgar then announced that District No. 1 was scheduled to meet on Thursday, July 18th, at 7:30 p.m. at the Santa Ana City Hall for a public hearing relative to collecting annual sewer service charges on the 1985-86 property tax bills. Mr. Edgar also announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee would meet on Tuesday, July 23rd, at 5:00 p.m. The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, July 24th, at 5:00 p.m. and invited Directors Joyce Risner and Richard Buck to attend and participate in the discussions. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported on an item Report of the General Manager appearing on the Supplemental Agenda relative to amending the Boards' action re purchase of Three One-Half Ton Pickup Trucks, Specification No. A-122, to provide for award to Mike McCarthy Buick & GMC rather than Mission GMC, as recommended by General Motors Corporation, because Mission GKC was unable to supply the trucks as ordered. Mr. Sylvester also reported on a Supplemental Agenda item in District 1 relative to non-compliance with the District's Industrial Waste Ordinance by Fima Services. He advised that as a result of a staff-level enforcement hearing conducted with representatives of the firm on July 8th, staff recommended that the Board establish August 14th as the date for a permit revocation hearing. ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by Annual election of Joint Chairman the Boards of Directors for the election of the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary stated that Directors Richard B. Edgar and Don R. Griffin had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 12, 1985, in accordance with established procedures. Mr. Edgar then addressed the Board. He reported that he had recently been elected to the Boards of the Orange County Transportation Commission and Orange County Transit District and that in order to maintain his high personal standards and to devote adequate time and effort to these new responsibilities, as well as his other obligations on the Tustin City Council and the Districts' Boards of Directors, he was withdrawing his name from nomination for the position of Joint Chairman of the Sanitation Districts. He then moved that a unanimous ballot be cast for Director Don R. Griffin as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. Whereupon, the Boards then cast a unanimous ballot for Director Don R. Griffin for the post of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. -5- 7/10/85 Joint Chairman Griffin then thanked the Directors for their vote of confidence and pledged to work closely with the Directors and do his very best to provide leadership and to carry on the Districts' tradition of excellence. On behalf of the Directors' he thanked past Joint Chairman Edgar for the excellent job he had done. ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by Annual election of vice Joint the Boards for election of the vice Chairman Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Joint Chairman called for nominations for the post, whereupon Directors Robert Ranson and Don E. Smith were nominated. The vote was then polled by written ballot and canvassed by a committee of the General Counsel and Directors Richard Edgar and Sam Cooper. Following the canvass, the General Counsel announced that Director Don E. Smith had been elected to the post of Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. Vice Joint Chairman Smith then thanked the Directors for electing him to the post and pledged to do his utmost for the Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 6 12 85 6 26 85 •.d ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 494,682.86 $ 331,958.81 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 96,097.26 202,852.56 Joint Working Capital Fund - 54,249.60 84,960.51 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 971.32 2,974.80 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 3,006.99 6,573.72 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 17,177.05 22,113.77 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 843.02 11,337.24 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 1,207.05 8,162.27 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 59.73 21.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 5,539.21 6,870.45 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 89.00 10,563.28 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 e 6 JOINT - 37.39 8,063.26 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 3,396.22 1,696.61 $ 677,356.70 $ 698,048.28 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary That the following resolutions for Federal and State Grants for authorizing and directing execution and the 1985-86 Joint Works Improve- filing of documents necessary for ments and Additions Federal Grants under 33 O.S.C., 1251 at seq. and State Grants under Clean water Bond Laws for the 1985-86 Joint Works Improvements and Additions, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors. -6- 7/10/85 District No. Resolution No. 1 85-97-1 2 85-98-2 3 85-99-3 5 85-100-5 6 85-101-6 7 85-102-7 11 85-103-11 13 85-104-13 ALL DISTRICTS moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-061R-2 and specifications for Rehabilitation of Job No. PW-061R-3 Digesters "C" and "D" at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-061R-2, and Rehabilitation of Digesters "F" and "G" at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-061R-3, authorizing an addition of $13,274,79 to the contract with Riewit Pacific Company for removal of sidewall and roof penetrations not indicated on the plans and cleanup of sludge and debris caused by an overflow, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Job No. PW-129 specifications for Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, authorizing changes including deletion of painting requirement, installation of stop/lock-out button at pump and sealing of tank interior, for a net deduction of $689.65 from the contract with Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-129 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-105, accepting Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-141 specifications for Ferrous Chloride System for Digester Gas Sulfide Reduction, Job No. PW-141, authorizing an addition of $25,097.80 to the contract with Fraser Corporation for miscellaneous job modifications including installation of 165 feet of water line and 170 feet of air line, realignment of a drain pipe, installation of eight replacement filters, credit for unused filters, and payment of early completion bonus related to AQMD Rule 431.1 requirements, be, and is hereby, approved. \ark -7- 7/10/85 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Job No. P2-5R-2 specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins "F" and -G- at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2, authorizing an addition of $3,774.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for installation of six larger stainless steel knife gate valves, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Specification No. R-018 to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. That the bid tabulation and recommendation re award of contract for Rehabilitation of No. 1 Trickling Filter at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-018, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Dorado . Enterprises, Inc. in the total amount of $29,620,00, ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Architectural Services Agreement with Pulaski and Arita, That the Selection Committee Architects Incorporated re certification re final negotiated fee re Job No. J-7-4 Architectural Services Agreement with Pulaski and Arita, Architects Incorporated, for design of Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-106, approving Architectural Services Agreement with Pulaski and Arita, Architects Incorporated, for design of Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, on an hourly-rate basis including actual salary, overhead and profit, plus direct job expenses, for a total amount not to exceed $168,500.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving agreement with MEngin in eerg-Science for value That the Selection Committee ign/enq ineering services re certification re final negotiated fee Jobs Nos. P1-25, P2-32, P1-26, with Engineering-Science for value P2-33, P2-34 design/engineering services re Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34; and coordinating schedules for above and other associated rehabilitation projects, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-107, approving agreement with Engineering-Science for value design/engineering services re Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, -8- 7/10/85 Job No. P2-341 and coordinating schedules for above and other associated rehabilitation projects, on an hourly-rate basis including overhead and Profit, plus direct costs, for a total amount not to exceed $102,100,00, A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Temporary Construction License and License Agreements with That the Boards of Directors hereby Orange County Water District re adopt Resolution No. 85-108, approving Green Acres Pipeline Temporary Construction License and License Agreements to occupy right-of-way with the Orange County Water District to construct and maintain its Green Acres Pipeline under Districts' interplant sewers adjacent to the Santa Ana River between Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 in the vicinities of Garfield Avenue and Adams Street. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on June 26, 1985, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adopting the County Treasurer's Annual Statement of Investment That the Boards of Directors hereby Policy adopt Resolution No. 85-108A, adopting the County Treasurer's Annual Statement of Investment Policy and requesting the County Auditor-Controller to review the County Treasurer's Monthly Investment Reports on behalf of the Districts, as V recommended by the General Counsel. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to CPT Corporation That staff be, and is hereby, authorized for word processing system upgrades to issue a purchase order to CPT Corporation in an amount not to exceed $108,611.00 for office automation/word processing system upgrades. ALL DISTRICTS The Director of Finance highlighted the Staff Report on 1985-86 Budgets comments in the transmittal for the individual District's 1985-86 budgets included with the Executive Committee Report and then answered questions of Directors on the budgets. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried Approving 1985-86 fiscal year by roll call vote: budgets That the District's 1985-86 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: -9- 7/10/85 District 1 Operating Fund $ 5,939,000.00 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 6,848,000.00 Facilities Revolving Fund 105,000.00 Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 151,375.00 $13,043,375.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried Approving 1985-86 fiscal year by roll call vote: budgets That the District's 1985-86 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: District 2 Operating Fund $20,168,000.00 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 43,420,000.00 Facilities Revolving Fund 21,888,000.00 Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 181,652.00 Bond & Interest Fund - 1958 1,323,621.00 - $86,981,273.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried Approving 1985-86 fiscal year by roll call vote: budgets That the District's 1985-86 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: District 3 Operating Fund $17,411,000.00 Accumulated Capital outlay Fund 43,247,000.00 Facilities Revolving Fund 11,670,000.00 Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 & 1958 919,588.00 $73,247,588:00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried Approving 1985-86 fiscal year by roll call vote: budgets That the District's 1985-86 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: -10- 7/10/85 District 5 Operating Fund $ 3,878,000.00 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 10,671,000.00 Facilities Revolving Fund 1,013,000.00 Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 45,060.00 $15,607,060.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried Approving 1985-86 fiscal year by roll call vote: budgets That the District's 1985-86 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: District 6 Operating Fund $ 4,077,000.00 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 4,386,000.00 Facilities Revolving Fund 1,054,000.00 Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 70,266.00 $ 9,587,266.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 •Moved, seconded and unanimously carried Approving 1985-86 fiscal year by roll call vote: budgets That the District's 1985-86 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: District 7 Operating Fund $ 5,567,000.00 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 20,976,000.00 Facilities Revolving Fund 10,222,000.00 Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 75,000.00 Bond & Interest Fund - 1962 1,431,000.00 Bond & Interest Fund - 1970 1,769,000.00 Sub-Total $40,040,000.00 Proposed District 14 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund $ 472,000.00 Total $40,512,000.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried Approving 1985-86 fiscal year by roll call vote: budgets That the District's 1985-86 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: -11- 7/10/85 District 11 Operating Fund $ 4,743,000.00 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 7,741,000.00 Facilities Revolving Fund 2,748,000.00 Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1951 26,100.00 Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1958 91,625.00 $15,349,725:00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried Approving 1985-86 fiscal year by roll call vote: budgets That the District's 1985-86 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: District 13 Operating Fund $ 257,000.00 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 6,578,000.00 Facilities Revolving Fund 862,000.00 $ 7,697,000.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20 That the Boards of Directors hereby re Management salary range adopt Resolution No. 85-109, amending adjustments Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re Management salary range adjustments pursuant to Management Performance Review Program. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing the annual Gann appropriations limits for fiscal That the following resolutions year 1985-86 establishing the annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal year 1985-86 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: DISTRICT REED. NO. LIMITATION 1 85-110-1 $1,740,309 2 85-111-2 7,236,699 3 85-112-3 9,113,843 5 85-113-5 1,874,003 6 85-114-6 1,090,863 a: 7 85-115-7 2,177,190 11 85-116-11 1,915,521 13 85-117-13 Not Applicable -12- //Lu/uD ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee re That the Report of the Fiscal Policy Districts' excess liability and Committee dated July 1, 1985, re actions workers' compensation insurance taken by the Committee relative to coverage Districts' excess liability and workers' �✓ compensation insurance coverage, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that on Ratifying action of the Fiscal June 27th, the Fiscal Policv Committee Policy Committee re placing had met to consider alternatives for $10,000,000 of secondary excess placing the Districts' secondary level liability insurance coverage of excess liability insurance coverage to take effect on July 1, 1985, as authorized by the Joint Boards on June 13th. The primary level of excess liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 had been placed in April, 1985. After considering the alternatives, the Committee directed the staff and the Districts' insurance broker to place the secondary level of coverage in the amount of $10,000,000 for an annual premium of $70,133.00 as set forth in the Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee dated July 1, 1985 included with the Boards' agenda package. The $10,000,000 of coverage was to be split into two tiers, the first $5,000,000 tier to one insurer for a premium of $50,133.00, and the second $5,000,000 tier to another insurer for a premium of $20,000,00. Mr. Sylvester reported that this week, subsequent to the Fiscal Policy Committee's actions, the insurance broker was informed by the second tier carrier that they are withdrawing from the liability reinsurance market place because of anticipated heavy losses they expect as the underwriter for Jalisco Cheese Co. The broker has, therefore, recommended that the second tier of coverage be placed with the next best bidder. This change will increase the annual premium for the $10,000,000 of secondary coverage to $77,633,00 plus applicable fees and taxes, The General Manager reported that staff concurred with the broker and recommended that the Fiscal Policy Committee's action be modified accordingly, It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the action of the Fiscal Policy Committee directing the staff and the Districts' insurance broker to place $10,000,000 of secondary excess liability insurance coverage effective July 1, 1985, be, and is hereby, ratified: and, FURTHER MOVED: That said action be modified for a total annual premium for said coverage of $77,633.00 plus applicable fees and taxes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of the Fiscal Policy Committee directing study of That the action of the Fiscal Policy feasibility of assuming a higher Committee directing the staff and the self-insured retention level for Districts' insurance broker to study the excess liability insurance coverage feasibility of the Districts assuming a higher self-insured retention level for excess liability insurance coverage beginning with the next policy year in 1986, be, and is hereby, ratified. -13- 7/10/85 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of the Fiscal Policy Committee re placing That the action of the Fiscal policy statutory workers' compensation Committee directing the staff and the coverage Districts' insurance broker to place statutory workers' compensation coverage (unlimited benefits) with a self-insured retention of $150,000 effective July 1, 1985, for an annual premium of $13*556.00, be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Director Edgar reported that the Select Approving Amendment No. 2 to the Committee to Advise the Staff had met to Sludge Management Agreement with consider a request from EEO EEO Systems/Orange County, Ltd. Systems/Orange County, Ltd. to extend certain milestones in the Sludge Management Agreement. He advised that the firm as acquired an out-of-county site and is preceding with due diligence to obtain the necessary permits and prepare a focused Environmental Impact Report requested by the permitting authorities. EEO has requested that the dates of certain milestones set forth in their Sludge Management Agreement be extended 90 days to allow for completion of the required EIR and construction and testing prior to full-scale operation of the proposed site on July 1, 1986. Mr. Edgar stated that the Committee recommends that the milestone dates be extended, as requested. Following a brief discussion of other sludge disposal alternatives, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Amendment No. 2 to the Sludge Management Agreement with ERO Systems/Orange County, Ltd., providing for a 90 day extension of the milestone dates for permits and environmental work, commencement of construction, completion of construction, and commencement of testing. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving agreement with Science Applications International That the Selection Committee's Corporation (SAIC) re certification of final negotiated fee re Specification No. 5-032 Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, for Contract Period No. 1, with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) , be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-118, approving agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, for the lump sum amount of $917#680,00; rejecting the proposal of Jacobs Environmental as non-responsive; and rejecting all other proposals received. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -14- 7/10/85 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relating to the Final SIR for Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Receive and file Staff Summary Moved, seconded and duly carried: Report That the Staff Summary Report dated June 26, 1985, summarizing the Final EIR re Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Verbal report of EIR consultant, The Chair recognized Mr. Kris K. P. Lindstrom 6 Associates Lindstrom, the Districts' SIR consultant, who briefly reviewed the comments received on the Draft EIR and addressed the issues raised in said comments, which include capacities and facilities sizing, air quality, visual impacts, solids disposal and chemical usage. He reported that the goal is for no increase in impacts on surrounding cities; and, in fact, the Districts plan to reduce impacts by covering facilities and other major projects to reduce air emissions. Pilot testing of equipment will be performed to determine the best available technology prior to use in the Districts' operations. Mr. Lindstrom indicated that the EIR addresses the first five years of the 20-year facilities plan. The consultant reviewed measures that will be taken to mitigate temporary construction impacts and impacts associated with operating the facilities. The Districts will review with neighboring cities landscape plans developed to mitigate visual impacts. Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly carried: V received after the public hearing That the following written comments received after the public hearing on April 10, 1985, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. From Date County of Orange - General Services Agency 4/02/85 County of Orange - Transportation/Planning Division 4/08/85 _ County of Orange - Public Works Design 4/12/85 South Coast Air Quality Management District 4/25/85 City of Fountain Valley 4/29/85 Orange County Water District 4/30/85 State of California - Office of Planning and Research 5/01/85 City of Huntington Beach 5/09/85 Receive, file and approve Final Moved, seconded and duly carried: SIR That the Final Environmental Impact Report for Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -15- 7/10/85 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards hereby certify that said Final Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the State and District Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. L Certifying the Final EIR Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-119, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan: making certain findings in connection therewith: adopting a statement of overriding considerations; and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination re said projects. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Approving 1983 Master Plan for Moved, seconded and duly carried: Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities, as That the 1983 Master Plan for Joint amended Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities, as amended, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending the Boards' action of February 13, 1985 re award of That the Boards' action of February 13, Specification No. A-122 1985 awarding purchase of Three (3) One-Half Ton Pickup Trucks, Specification No. A-122, to Mission GMC Trucks, Inc. in the amount of $22,050.00 plus tax, be, and is hereby, amended, cancelling said award to Mission GMC inasmuch as they cannot supply the trucks ordered, and authorizing the staff to `•✓ issue a purchase order to Mike McCarthy Buick 6 GMC for said vehicles in the same amount of $22,050.00 plus tax. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing a Facilities Revolving Fund That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-120-1, establishing a Facilities Revolving Fund to account for the District's connection fees. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report re non-compliance by Fima Services That the Staff Report dated July 10, re Permits 1-196 and 1-197 1985, relative to non-compliance with the District's Industrial Waste Ordinance by Fima Services relative to Permits 1-196 and 1-197, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing time and place for revocation hearing on Industrial That August 14, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. at Waste Permits 1-196 and 1-197 the District's Administrative Office be, issued to Fima Services and are hereby, established as the time and place for revocation hearing on `r Industrial Waste Permits 1-196 and 1-197 issued to Fima Services. -16- 7/10/85 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 18, 1985 at the Santa Ana City Council Chambers. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m., July 10, 1985. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Contract No. 2-24 specifications for Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, authorizing miscellaneous items of extra work, approving a time extension of 82 calendar days for completion of said work, and assessing liquidated damages for 27 calendar days at $250 per day for late completion, for a net deduction of $2,843.88 from the contract with Subgrade Construction Company, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carrieds Accepting Contract No. 2-24 as complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-121-2, accepting Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Services Agreement That the Selection Committee re Contract No. 2-25 certification re final negotiated fee re Addendum No. 1 to Engineering Services Agreement with Lowry and Associates for design of the Fullerton-Brea Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-23, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved] and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-122-2, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Services Agreement with Lowry and Associates for design of the Fullerton-Brea Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-25, providing for alignment changes to install the sewer in Harbor Boulevard between Berkeley Avenue and Valley View Driver for inclusion of detour traffic plans; consolidation of two projects into one; and for work on the existing sewer, for a lump sum fee of $62,601.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $330,000.00 to $392,601.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carrieds Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, 1985. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m., July 10, 1985. v -17- 7/10/85 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Engineering Services Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert, That the Selection Committee Civil Engineer re Contract certification re final negotiated fee No. 3-28R-1 with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for design of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-123-3, approving Engineering Services Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for design of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole (Vault) Rehabilitation at Various Locations, Contract No. 3-28R-1, on an hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead, plus direct expenses and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $39,610.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 3-28R as complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-124-3, accepting Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny application for leave to file late claim from That the application for leave to file Automobile Club of Southern late claim from the Automobile Club of California on behalf of Carmen and Southern California filed on behalf of Charlotte Vernieri Carmen and Charlotte Vernieri with regard to alleged damages to their vehicle sustained in connection with Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied, as recommended by the General Counsel. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 24, 1985. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m. , July 10, 1985. DISTRICTS 5 6 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Contract No. 5-19-R2 to John T. Malloy and John T. Malloy, That the Boards of Directors hereby Inc., a Joint Venture adopt Resolution No. 85-125 to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Replacement of Portions of "B" Trunk Sewer, East of Santa Ana River Junction Structure to Bitter Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-19-R2, to John T. Malloy and John T. Malloy, Inc., a Joint Venture, in the amount of $420,710.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -18- 7/10/85 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 24, 1985. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m., July 10, 1985. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, 1985. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m., July 10, 1985. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and Contract No. 7-2C-4 specifications for Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4, transmitting new proposal and bond forms which change the quantity of 60-inch reinforced concrete pipe from 4,199 linear feet to 3,969 linear feet, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Contract No. 7-2C-4 to Steve Bubalo Construction Company That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-126-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4, to Steve Bubalo Construction Company in the amount of $2,240,920.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached 1� hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of Southern California Edison Company That the claim of Southern California re Contract No. 7-8 Edison Company for alleged damages to their underground ducts in connection with construction of the Von Harman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' liability claims administrator, General Counsel, bontractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, 1985. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:50 p.m., July 10, 1985. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report re Blockage on Golden West Trunk Sewer That the Staff Report dated June 30, 1985, re Blockage on Golden West Trunk Sewer be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -19- 7/10/85 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to prepare plans and specifications re That staff be, and is hereby, authorized Contract No. 11-3-1 to prepare plans and specifications for `, Installation of Two Additional Manholes - on the Golden West Trunk Sewer Siphon, Contract No. 11-3-1, at the Garden Grove-Wintersburg Flood Control Channel to allow better maintenance access and alleviate future blockages. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, 1985. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:50 p.m., July 10, 1985. DISTRICT 13 loved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing funds to account for the District's revenues and That the Board of Directors hereby expenditures adopts Resolution No. 85-127-13, establishing funds to account for the District's revenues and expenditures. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 13 loved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, v.d 1985. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8.50 p.m. , July 10, 1985. Secretary, Boa ds of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 -20- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCI'SSING DATE 6/3t/b5 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMSE.P AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLA IKS PAID 06/12/85 WARRANT N0. VENOOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 074782 ABC LUMBER CORP. - $41.24 HARDWARE 0747B3 - - ABC METALS SUPPLY. INC. S135.42 STEEL 074784 AGN ELECTRONICS. INC. S05.39 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074785 AIR CALIFORNIA }1e0.0➢ - _ AIR FARE 074786 ALLIED CORPORATION $17.726.20 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 074787 AMERICAN AIR FILTER. INC. S430.17 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074788 AMERICAN COMPRESSOR PARTS $1,287.90 COMPRESSOR � ,.. 0141AM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING S47.08 PUBLICATION 074790 ANAHEIM BUSINESS MACHINES $52.50 OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR ' 074791 ANANEIM SE YER_ SAIIEUCTION _}2..p47a 4➢ _. REPAIR SEWER LINE - DIST. 7 074792 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. S778.94 PUMP PARTS 874793 ANDREV COMPANY '$1.010.49 HARDWARE 074794 ARNCO INC. _ . _ _ „_ . S9.170.12 PIPE REPAIR KITS - 074795 ARROW-fl ISCo�INC. i447.76 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ; 474796 ASSOCIATED DIESEL :391.92 TRUCK REPAIR 074797 RALPH Y. ATKINSON _ ..S95$z29- __--_... ...__._ PUMP- PARTS 074798 BKK CORPORATION S4.381.69 SLUDGE DISPOSAL 074799 BAYLESS STATIONERS S280.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES M 074809 BEARINGS_. INC. 1118.47 BEARINGS 079801 -b ECKNAN INS!ROME NIS i489.07 LAB SUPPLIES 074802 BECKMAN INDUSTRIAL 1 $2.848.07 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES w 074003 PAUL BERGERON _ _ S15.99 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 074804 BERRYMAN 9 STEPHENSON.INC - -- 3739.87 ENGINEERING 2-6-2 0748G5 BERTECH $43.18 TOOLS 0748� _ BEVCO INDUSTRIAL VEHICLE; ;645.96 TRUCK PARTS 1--� 074807 BIG BOX RENTAL CO. S2.865.00 TRASH DISPOSAL 0174808 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS $235.41 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 074809 BOMAR_MAJNETO $EMYItE. INC. ;3I7.37 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES B74810 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES S2.968.b9 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARATION 074811 WILLIAM H. BUTLER S1.J55.35 PETTY CASH 074812 C S R RECOND17IONING CO. $640.00 PUMP REPAIR --074813 - - - CS COMPANY $11004.78 VALVES 074814 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. $516.99 LAB SUPPLIES 074815 CAL-VEST INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS 31092.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 074016 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITARY AGENCIES $440.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 074817 CAREY SIGN GRAFHICS $769.30 PARKING LOT SIGNS 074818 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS S5.462.46 ENGINEERING P2-25-2 074919 CHRIS CERVELLONE $29.73 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 07182D CHEVRON U.S.A.♦ INC. $3.520.74 GASOLINE/OIL 074821 _ THE -CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION $213.00 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 074822 GARY E. COATE $12.92 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 07AS23 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMLNT CO. S57.39 LAB SUPPLIES . _ 071821 C.I.E.S. . CO. . INC. $541.0. ENGINE REPAIR 074825 CORRELL CHEVROLET ;16.92 TRUCK PARTS D74826 CONSOLIDATED ELFCTRICAL DIST. $2.178.37 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES __079827 CONSOLIDATED REPRODUCTIONS 387.15 BLUEPRINT[MA REPRODUCTIONS FUND NO JT PAST WCRMIKt. CAPITAL t PROEFi'S INC UNIT 1 /:.•./H^ LACI PEFORT NUMUFR AFg3 - CCUNIV SAUITATLUN DISTRICTS Of Okt MGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID i6/12105 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 074828 CONTINENTAL RADIATOR 5377.97 TRUCK REPAIR 074629 COKIPOL DATA COPP. SIO.J22.38 PROCESS CONTROL COMPUTER REPAIRS 074030 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES SIOR1.42 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074831 COSTA MESA AUTO PARTS. INC. $76.10 TRUCK PARTS 47A832 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S813.38 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES C74833 DECO f1.7U. 17 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074834 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES $63.60 PUBLICATION -- 074835 DICKSON SAFETY PRODUCTS CO. $333.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES 074836 DIETERICH - POST CO. $81.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 074837 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 1285.43 PRINTING 0748SS DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. 16398.80 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 074839 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. 317.398.33 REPLACE BUDD CHAIN 074840 DORR-OLIVER. INC. S1.413.34 PUMP PARTS - 074841 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. S664.46 PAINT SUPPLIES 074842 EASTMAN. INC. $2,401.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 074843 ENGINEERS SALES-SCRVICE CO. $13.899.40 CONTROL PANELS-SARI/SUNFLOWER DIVERSION 074844 --- - FMC CORP. - - $188.98 PUMP PARTS 074845 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $22.00 DELIVERY SERVICE 074846 _ FILTER SUPFLY CO. 12.728.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES + � 074847 FISHER CONTROLS [D. $49.29 REGULATORS -- 074848 FISHER CONTROLS IN7L..INC. $12.13 REGULATORS 074899 FLAT G VERTICAL CONCRETE _ _ _. $825.75 _ CONCRETE CUTTING 0 98 O FDONALDREDER L. PUMP 6 ASSOCIATES 6149.60 SAFETY CONSULTANT • --I 479851 FRE DER ICN PUMP t fNG1!!FCRING f199.80 PUMP PARTS 074852 _ _ FREEWAY TRUCK FARTS S1.713.38 TRUCK PARTS -O7GO93 CITY OF FULLER TON i19.63 WATER USEAGE PJ 079859 GANAHL LUMBER CO. 1243.80 LUMBER 114955 ____GEM-0I-CITE PLASTICS CORP. $26.82 PLASTIC SHEETING 074856 GENERAL SEAL COMPANY 3191.45 STUFFING BOX SEALANT 074857 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. f568.52 TELEPHONE 014858 GIERLICM-1117CMELL. INC. f3.278.91 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 074859 GOULD PUMPS. INC. $1.089.28 PUMP PARTS 074868 HACH COMPANY f172.67 LAB SUPPLIES 074861 HOUSE-OF INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $179.78 PIPE SUPPLIES 798 2_ MOUSE OF BATTERIES $236.58 BATTERY 874863 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $524.87 PAINT SUPPLIES 074864 CITY OF HUNTINGTON PEACH S11.79 WATER USEAGE - 674865 HURLEY ELECTRONICS. INC. $12.18 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074866 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL CO. 112 A03.11 FERRIC CHLORIDE 071867 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE $418.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 71868 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT f4.]C WATER USEAGE 074869 IRVINE SWEEPING SERVICE 1951.]0 SWEEPING SERVICE 074PIO THE JANITORS Sh OPPF 1503.1,7 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 074871 JONES CHEMICALS. INC. f2.556.19 CHLORINE G74872 KEEN-KUT ABRASIVE CG. S3B1.60 TOOLS I 074673 KELCO SALES 0 FNGINFEFING LO. 1233.68 PIPE SUPPLIES y I FUND NO 4199 - JT LIST YOF.KIMT, CAPIIPL CROCFSSiNO UATF 6/.15/N5 IAGF RETORT NUMBFP AC93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF O&ANGL COUNTY CLAIMS PAID J6112185 -WARRANT NO. VENDOP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 074874 KING BEARING, INC. S562.69 BEARINGS 674875 KLEEH-LINE COOP $628.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 074876 DON L. KLINE $115.21 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 074877 _ _ KOOL MIST CORP. S97.03 SPRAY COOLANT 07987E L.B.Y.S.. INC. S66.70 WELDING SUPPLIES 079079 LAURSEN COLOR LAS S502.99 FILM PROCESSING 979880 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENCR. S93r898.J0 ENGINEERING P2-29 074881 - LIFECON-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY $32.71 SAFETY SUPPLIES ix 079882 LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. $99.30 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 079083 _LILLT. TTPESETTIN6 S15.90 PRINTING 074884 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S1/.23 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Ix 074885 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP 1172.78 EQUIPMENT PARTS 074806 MECHANICAL DRIVE SYSTEMS $133.15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 079887 MEO-TOX ASSOCIATES. INC. $9.975.00 REMOVAL S DISPOSAL OF ASBESTOS I 074888 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $714.56 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 074869 PAUL, Aa_N I.TCNELL $66.67 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 074890 NAFCO S323.22 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1 074891 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES, INC. S6.J62.50 OIL SPILL CLEANUP/DISPOSAL 074892 NEELY S WALKERF INC. $95,52 WELDER REPAIR 079593 NEY TIE RMES, INC. 1221.69 EQUIPMENT PARTS 1 S 07AB94 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. S2.395.97 CAUSTIC SODA 079095 OLYNPLC_CHEMICAL COa _. -. . . 65}.995.35 CHLORINE 079896 OR ITEM COMP $337.311 BEARINGS --1 079897 OXYGEN SERVICE $199.83 NITROGEN 079898 COUNTY OF ORANGE $3,346.09 CONTRACTOR 2-10-IA is- 1 079899 CO. OF ORANGE46DITOR CONTROLR $121.290.00 SLUDGE DISPOSAL W 074900 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $971.32 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 749 PP,fi_IMqu3jRIESt INCt 81A709r95 PAINT SUPPLIES 074902 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. S126.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES A 074903 PACIFIC BELL 1190.85 TELEPHONE 079909 _ ....,_ , PEROXIDATION SYS T EM59 INC. SISr 3D1.65 PEROXIDE 79 MAN OLD LO PRIMROSE ICE 560.00 ICE 074986 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMMENT $I r599.33 EQUIPMENT PARTS 074907 PROGRESSIVE STEEL SUPPLY $267,15 STEEL 079908 _PUMP ENGINEERING 11.585.39 PUMP PARTS 074989 RACAL - VADIC S102.17 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 074910 _ RAIN60Y DISPOSAL CO. S355.J0 TRASH DISPOSAL __ - 679911 RED VALVE CO.. INC. ' SI.33?.Sb PIPE SUPPLIES 074912 REYNOLD ALUMINUM SUPPLY CO. S17J.77 ALUMINUM 074913 ROBBINS L MYERS INC. $1r85A.92 PUMP 079919 - ROCCOAS TRUCK WRECKING $689.J0 TRUCK PARTS 074915 JOSEPM T. RYERSON S SON. INC. 1311.22 STEEL 074916 SANCON INC. 1100.00 DIGESTER REPAIR 074917 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS 5619.58 ELECTRIC MOTOR 074918 CITY OF SEAL BEACH S123.U6 WATER USEAGE 074919 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,665.13 _ TOOLS FUND NO )9 - JT DIST WUkKINC CCFIT+L PROC I'S I N6•D:TF 6/95/5` PALE 6EF04T UUKIIi6 AF43 CCUNTV SARITAIION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID .16/12/85 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 074920 SMITH-EMERY CO. 172.94 SOILS TESTING 079921 SOUTH COAST DODGE f53.98 TRUCK PARTS 074922 SOUTH COAST OFFICE EGUIFNENT 1576.64 OFFICE FURNITURE 079523 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. 3235.863.58 POWER 074924 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. $9.17 WATER USEAGE 014925 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 16.594.46 DIESEL FUEL 074926 SPEEDE SPEEDOMETER 547.72 TRUCK PARTS 074927 SPIESS CONSTRUCTION CO. 112r861.JD BUBBLE DIFFUSER INSTALLATION-PLANT 1 074928 STATION STEEL $316.41 STEEL A74929 __ _ SUPER CHEM CORF SR02.42 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 071930 THE SUFPLIERS 1939.13 TOOLS 074531 TAR TAKANINE $2.080.110 LANDSCAPING _ 074532 7EPCO. INC. $95.93 PORTABLE AIR CLEANER 074933 - LETNA THOMAS $7.18 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 074934 THREE M CO. $163.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 074935 _ TRAVEL TRAVEL i346.00 AIR FARE -�7193fi TRUCK-9 AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $5,474.86 TRUCK PARTS 074937 J.G. TUCKER E SON. INC. $1.458.26 PUMP PARTS 074938 ----UNITED UNION SIGN CO. 559.36 SIGNS FOR PARKING LOT-PLANT I -074939 UNITED PARCELSERVICE $82.85 DELIVERY SERVICE 07494 UNITED LAM EQUIP. Co.. INC. $107.08 ENGINE PARTS 079941 UNIVERSAL HACAC K 511 4.96 TRUCK PARTS 079992 AL U6S IC 1 f17.00 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 074944 V.O.C. TESTING 11.853.87 EMISSION TESTING OF DIGESTERS 074949 VAR SCIENTIFIC 51.853.67 LAB SUPPLIES 074946 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY Co. S2.659.55 HARDWARE 074947 VALVE SERVICES. INC. $25.38 VALVE REPAIR 074948 _ CARL Y. VIEVEG ;25.38 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 079940 YO SSLEP L 00NP ANY $632.85 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 074949 JOHN R. MAPLES $388.51 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTING 074950 _ WASTE WATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS $130.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION �074951 WAUNESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER 1215.44 ENGINE PARTS 874952 WESTERN WIRE 9 -ALLOY 524.80 _ TOOLS 074953 WE_SCR_ f823. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -Q7i954 B. D. -WHETSTONE E ASSOCIATES i3.275.85tl5 USER FEE EDP SERVICES-DIST 16 074955 WHITE, FINE L VERVILLE $1,519.15 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 074956 _ WILSON FORD SALES 438.16 TRUCK PARTS D74957 - - GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES $1.O85.15 VALVE 674958 CHRIS ROBBY $82.59 DIRECTORS COMPENSATION 1 MILEAGE _079959 JO HN A. TNOMAS i159.52 DIRECTORS COMPENSATION 6 MILEAGE ----------------- _ TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 16/12/N5 Sb77.55n00 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/05/85 PACE 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 06/12/85 SUMMARY AMOUNT /I OPER FUND $ 3.006.99 02 OPER FUND 1.245.03 /3_ACO FUND 13.839.35 %2 F%R FUND 2.092.67 13 OPEN FUND 743.89 _ 03 ACO FUND 99.13 15 OPEN FUND 1.207.05 /6 OPER FUND 59.73 17 OPER FUND 4.189.67 /7 F/P FUND 1,349.54 011 OPEN FUND 89.00 9596 OPEN FUND 37.39 06sj OPtR FUND 3,396.22 JT OPER FUND 494,682.86 N CORE 96,097.26 n SELF LANDED WORKERS CORP. INSURANCE FUND 971.32 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 54,249.60 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 6/12/85 $677,356.70 4 FUND MD a� ' .11 e'I41 ACIA IHI C.. 11.1 " "i Rt i<i1H I' •ell .. /. /•- .AFi M'NRl OU%1'f I` SP95 :AV113IION IJSI F.ICIS OF ORANOL COUNTY CLAIMS PAID D6126/l S. OAPRANT NO. VENOCI At•OUNT 31 'iCQ IF T ION ..- -074972 INC INCUMFO6ATED 17U4.22 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT 074973 ADVANCO CONSiRUCIUKf. INC. 116. 154.40 INSTALLATION OF PRESSURE RELIEF BYPASS 074974 ALLIED ANALYTICAL SISTERS L436.76 LAD SUPPLIES '•A}8---- -----AILI'_0 CORnOPAT10N 561.331.44 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS C74976 AMIAICA.N AIR FILiTP. IMC. 12)1.24 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES •.74977 AMFNICAN CORFRFSSOk PAATf $2,676.17 COMPRESSOR --- 74578- - - - AMLRICAN SCIENTIFIC FF ODUCIt 5229.59 LAB SUPPLIES 174979 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY 142.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES 074960 ANAMEIM SERER CONSTFUCTION $97'I.CO SEWER LATERAL REPAIRS-GIST FT •48.- TMF. ANCHOR-PACMIN6 CO. $1,905.190 PIPE SUPPLIES 074982 ANGFLICA RENTAL SERVICES CNCUP 11JJ.10 TOWEL RENTAL 074983 ARROW-RISCO, INC. 1657.28 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES �J74984--- AUDIO GRAPHIC SYSTLMR $211.15 OFFICE EQUIPMENT $74986 AUTOCON INDUSTRIES. INC. 6102.01 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 0T4986 BC INDUSTRIAL SUffl.l. IMC. $66.55 TOOLS I;:.""7 PKN-GBRPBRA71ON - 540.093.79 SLUDGE DISPOSAL 074908 PECKMAN INDUSTRIAL 51.657.27 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT L4189 J.P. BEECHER ASSOC.. 1kC. 4155.2% ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 4990--p"JEC11- - $212.13 TOOLS `S 074991 BIERLY 8 ASSOCIATES. IF1C. $550.00 WORKERS COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION �"• 074992 FLACK L DECKER MFG. CO. $84.12 TOOL REPAIR T 07499i �R4d70 L-PARK-WEB FCAL- CAP..-dNC--- - $221.00 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL EXAMS --i 074994 BUSINESS MONITOR SBR.40 SUBSCRIPTION 071995 WILLIAM H. BUTLER 67.646.37 PETTY CASH 50 c 4906 .-.0 B A RECONDITIONING CO. A495.00 ROTOR REPAIR N 074997 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. $53.07 LAB SUPPLIES 074998 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL $1.395.10 FLOW METER RENTAL '4994 'ONN-CAROLLO-ENGINFENE - 55.629.12 ENGINEERING P2.25-2 075000 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $67,504.42 ENGINEERING PI-2I, P2-28-1 G P2-28-2 07E001 CH[SSELL CORP. 11)2.45 EQUIPMENT PARTS -0IF002 - -- CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. 13.615.6E MOTOR OIL 015003 CIVIC CENTER LOCK L SAFE SU.05 HARDWARE C15004 CORINNE. CLAWSON $17.43 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE -87f006 -MINE-E OLL IN9 ENTENPPIFF5 1244.33 TRUCK PARTS 07`.006 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL UIZI. 11. 11L.15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 970007 CONSOLIDATED RCPROOLICITOOS $3.369.54 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTIONS --07600E - COATINENTAL AIR TGOI.S. INC. $510.00 TOOL RENTAL 075569 . CORTINFMTAL RAOIATRI %I.A2T.R2 TRUCK REPAIR 07.1018 CONTROL DATA CALIF. 1750.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR "•BDH--- -_.. .. .CONTROL DATA CORPORATION 1R1.775.!!. CONTRACTOR P2-23-6 075012 000FF'R EMf A6V F.TRV1CfS 15.SS 1.12 ENGINE PARTS 075013 COUNTY WHOLESALE fLICIt.IC 4173.35 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -- C75f,14 JCUFV CROS'+ PAVINF 111.063.03 PARKING LOT PAVING-PLANT I 075015 CAL WAI1'R 1155.1f, WATER SOFTENER RENTAL 07SO26 SFATF OF COLIFORN14 ANNEXATION F59 PROCESSING FEE --075017 STATE OF CALIf OPN11 IiF,1.7n HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL TAX FUND NO -I- ? - .IT .:ISI .IO6KINf C+i II'L TdOf. c91F - as 1. 1/P /R'- IA( : -- RIPORI 11U911CH AI.43 Ci UA.TV ! A-ITAI II'M '-I' TRICIS OF OF AIIEI COUH TV CL..IKS a1P .6/26/85 WARRANT NO. VF WOOF AC CUNT I .:CF IF T ION -- 47501B OM':. INC. 1,9.71 FREIGHT CHARGES 075019 DAl1Y FIL07 648.00 LEGAL ADVERTISING 075020 PECKER. INSTPUNCNT SUPPLY C.). $299.99 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPLIES -C75021 DECO $1,664.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 075622 OSIST-DINSFIELC, INC 12.277.J? INSTALL BUBBLE DIFFUSER SYSTEM CONTROLS 075023 CEW--PAP SALES L SEOVICi 1256.72 PIPE SUPPLIES -. 075024 C.ICKSONS SbAb.46 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 075025 OTTO COMPANY INC. 1419.64 TRUCK PARTS 075026 DIFTCRICH - POST CO. $31.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES -075020 ------ - DIFILIFPO ASSOCIATES $427.42 PRINTING 075E26 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. S21.971.34 REPLACEMENT OF BUDD CHAIN 075C29 DURP.-OLIVER. INC. $1,411.34 PUMP PARTS -. 075030- - - DUNN EDWARDS CCRF. $2,722.35 PAINT SUPPLIES 075031 EASTMAN. INC. $2,828.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES C75032 ENCHANTER. INC. S3.500.50 OCEAN MONITORING - FANILIAN-RIPE S SUPPLY S605.54 - PIPE SUPPLIES C75034 FILTER SUPPLY CO. 140.`.6 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES M 075035 FISCHER L POSTER CO. $8.077.29 VALVES' ?C-075036---- - FLO-SYSTEMS - - 558.64 PIPE SUPPLIES ti 075037 CLIFFOPD A. FORKERT SB.707.52 ENGINEERING 5-19-R2 C= 075C38 DONALD L. FOX L ASSOCIATES S825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 076030 -THE-FOKBORO.COMPANY - - - $154.43 - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES --1 07544G FREDERICK PUMP S FMGINEECIWC $74.94 PUMP PARTS 075041 FRICK-6ALLAGHER MFG. $54.68 FREIGHT CHARGES 075042 .---. FROST ENGINEERING SENVICES CO. $276.00 VALVES PJ 075L'43 CITY OF FULLERTON $180.63 WATER USEAGE 075044 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY SE.258.43 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES n75-A5 Gh"WEM_PRODUCTS- . INC. - S6.033.60 WOOD SHAVINGS 075446 GENLRAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.557.54 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES 075047 61LKLICH-MITCHELL. INC. $65.56 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -C75048 -- . GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIC. 4163.511 OFFICE SUPPLIES 075049 GOULD PUMPS. INC. $723.35 PUMP PARTS 075050 GRAPHIC CCNIRDIS $199.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES -475051 -R IFFIN-FLI'[TN GNICS 33J11.Pl REFUND OF DEPOSIT 075652 T.CORCE T. MALL CO. S47.23 PIPE SUPPLIES 075153 HALPRIN SUPPLY CO. 1-56.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -_.. C75C54 HALSIEC S HOGGAN, INC. 194.46 PUMP PARTS 075055 HAHILTON INSTRUMENTS S117.11 ELECTRICAL REPAIR 07525f HAkk INGTON INDUSTRIAL. PLASTICS S14.8G HARDWARE -835457. W.C. HENDRIF S CO.. INC. S4. 138.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES A75C58 HOLMCS TUITLE DATSU9 1314.1-6 TRUCK PARTS C75P59 HOo170h I!TGP-RF.ACP $661.55 CYLINDERS -._. . C75060 CITY OF HU47INCTOI: IT ACIi S12.7b WATER USEAGE 075061 1UNTINCTON 2LACH IOI PfN 'T AIP 136.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 075062 ISI:u COMFABY IA.252.13 PUMP e♦c A63-- IMf U%TkIAI THRf AOFI. 1'KOiI1.C15 ! 372.45 HARDWARE FUND NO 'I'( Jf rl•,i 10,hlN' 1"1 i1:1 ` IPOC1 ;':J A:. 1 . 1-1 A/^ /• ! 1aF,1 MIT ASI AT COUN IV SAN IT IIGN 1.1 STS I C.IS OF OA U:CL COUh I CIAIFS FAIP 14/26/"5 WARRANT NO. VFNPnP 2N1 JN1 rCafn L'i ION __._0750bq 711T JANITOR'S SMOFP! 35h•IN JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 075065 JOY CHEMICAL CO. $1 .7LU.JC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 075066 YAS SAFETY PRODUCTS S76.27 SAFETY SUPPLIES --.:6067----------KELCO 6'ALES F ENGINE LPINO CG. $46.111 RUBBER PRODUCTS b 15D68 KING SEANIN6. INC. $4.663.49 BEARINGS .)4069 RILSI PURI S MACHINI 101,51,6 $I.964.^6 PUMP PARTS _ 11 t,070 - KLFER-LINC CORP $410.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES "75071 DON L. KLINE $28.119 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 1.75072 GEOFFREY KPEUT2ER 3160.•IC DESIGN PANEL WORKSTATIONS -- 1VO-73 -L-6-N--UNIFONM SUFPIY CO 64064.81 UNIFORM RENTAL A79074 L.D.M.S.. INC. $136.23 OXYGEN 075075 LAP CONCO COPP 191.36 LAB SUPPLIES -07.5076-------- LAURSEN COLOR LAB 1345.62 FILM PROCESSING 075077 LERNLR PHOTO. INC. 1L6.79 FILM PROCESSING 075078 LIGMIING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. S523.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES +•^7G- --606-AN6E LF 6- SIhEB - $2.359.11 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 075080 THE CHARLES LOWE CO. $443.25 PUMP PARTS 17 075081 LOWRY R ASSOCIATCS $5,426.20 ENGINEERING 2-25 4-075082---IIA RNY A. LOWRY 6 ALSOC.♦ INC. S811.06 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES C 075083 MARVAC ELEC700MICS 193.07 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 075089 RAY MATAELE S4.500.0b LANDSCAPING -PLANT 2 r- 07`ABF- MA-T4---GMLBA.-INBa--..-.. _ .._...___-.,_._._.....- _ 245.64 FREIGHT CHARGES -1 075006 MCbAIN INSTRUMENTS $292.43 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT d 075087 MCKESSON CHEMICAL CO. S2.166.00 HYDROCHLORIC ACID F---075G88 MCHASTCR-CARR bUFPLV CO. 3210.88 TOOLS N 075089 METER MASTER. INC. $45.40 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 075090 MINE SAFETY APFLIANCFS CO. l895.97 PUMP PARTS 075E=L---MONO-GROUPF- INC.------- - -- " " $183.37 FREIGHT CHARGES 075092 MONTGOMERY ELEVATOR COMPANY $32N.40 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 975093 J. AFThUR MOORED CA. TKC. $1 .391.76 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES -476694--- - - - MOTOROLA, INC. $10,455.09 MOBILE RADI"MDUSTRIAL WASTE DIVISION 075095 NATIONAL LUMRFM $736.15 HARDWARE 075096 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC,. $3,375.35 TV INSPECTION OF SEWER LINES --NEW-MEPMES• INC. $61.ER EQUIPMENT PARTS 075098 OCR BEPROGRAFMICS, INC. 11,273.76 BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTION 076099 000IIENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. $3.411.81 CAUSTIC SODA ---670100 OLY14PIC CHEMICAL C.D. 351.934.4%3 CHLORINE 0751G1 ORANGE VALVE L FITTING CO- 1917•48 PIPE SUPPLIES 075102 ORITEX CORP 42f446.60 ORITEX SHEETING - 70.105---- - 03ROFNE LARDRATORIESI INC. $1 .117.54 PIPE INSPECTION 016104 COU1111 OF CPANGT AN. lei AP RADIO EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE C75105 COUNTY SANITATION 0TF'TI ICI 1.17t .N9 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FOND -- 671.166 F.C.7. INSTkUMLNT CA. A390.b2 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 075107 VPO INDUSTRIES, 1PC. %%74.44 PAINT SUPPLIES 075108 I I'.A. PNINTING 33`. 6 A• PRINTING -.076109 PAC IfIC SAf ETY F4.011'Pi lii f.•, 1471.f4 SAFETY SUPPLIES FUND Nn - - J1 UISI PC IN iM3 f! fl°I IFGff SL I%. ILIt o/'. /. ' I4GI C:4'PTY 141!I1r T 11P 19 iTOIC IS Oi Uh Ahff COUNTY CLLII I 'll. --WARRANT NO. •Af M::01: :F OUNI .n::f•111-T I-IN -- 075210 P4r If IC LELL 11,05. 11 TELEPHONE NETWORK CHARGES 075111 FAFTS L•NLI✓.I7E0 $1.150.14 TRUCK PARTS 075112 CIIARLFS PASIMLI 1+2.35 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE -035113 PATTEN CORP. 12T9.53 STRIP CHARTS 075134 POSTMASTER $2.`31.: ! POSTAGE 075115 FRiCISION GASMFT 1293.94 COMPRESSOR PARTS --075116 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 16J.U0 ICE 875117 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY SS4.OB CONTRUCTION MATERIAL 075118 FADINS TOOL S 46RASIVC CO. 1195.74 TOOLS -07F•119 - THE PEOISTFF- ".593.52 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 075120 THE REGISTER S9UJ.4M LEGAL ADVERTISING 075121 REYUDRD. INC. S63S.40 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -CL75122- --- REYNOLD ALUMINUM SUPFLV Co. 5472.92 ALUMINUM 075123 RICOH CORP 5296.00 COPIER LEASE 075124 JOSEPH T. RYFRSON L SON. INC. $280.90 STEEL : 6--- - SAS-MIFF.-1NC. - 13.568.81 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 075126 YVOHNF SCHWAB $7.18 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE FTT 075127 SC IFNCF 5741.18 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING 2 07512R SAAHAOCK SUPPLY $1.704.29 TOOLS 075129 SMITH-EMERY CO. 524.30 SOILS TESTING pp 075130 SOUTH COAST OFFICE LOUIPHFNT $1.343.50 OFFICE FURNITURE "• SOUTHFBN-CALIF.-EDI SON 00. ------- - $107.926.33 - POWER 075132 SO. CAL. GAS CO. 543.704.75 NATURAL US by 075133 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 512.961.43 DIESEL FUEL -1-87 5134------. SPARKLETTS-DRINKING WATFF t1.396.49 BOTTLED WATER != 075135 STATEFA CONTROL SYSTEMS $42.94 DAMPER MOTOR 075136 STAROW STEEL 1349.49 STEEL �a137 ---SCOT"TEVENS - -- - - -- - - 1148.63 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 075138 THE SUPPLIERS SI.144.92 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 075139 SWEETLAND CO. SR4.64 PIPE SUPPLIES -075140--.... CASTLE / DIV. OF SYhRON CGhF. 1251.75 LAB MAINTENANCE 075141 F.X. THOMAS AIR CONDITIOUIHG 12047.68 INSTALL WATER COIL 075142 TN9NPSON LACDULR CO. $1,526.55 PAINT SUPPLIES ^1'-•43 -CMAKKOK- C. TIA 522.55 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE G7EIA4 TRANSAMERICA DFLAVAL. INF. $444.74 ENGINE 075145 TRAVIL ThAVEL ST66.14 AIR FARE _-. .075146 TAFFFIL CAFITAL C1:PF Gi CALIF . i5i5.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES 075147 TRUCE. E AUTO SUFFIY, IPC. 11.151.13 TRUCK PARTS 075148 J.G. TUCF�R 8 SON. INC. $253.04 SAFETY SUPPLIES --075149-.. ... U.S. AUTO '.LASS. INC . 11-15.36 TRUCK PARTS 075150 UNION OIL CO. OF CAL IF . IPP.S7 GASOLINE 075151 UNITLU PARCEL ^FFVICC 547.76 DELIVERY SERVICE -- 075152 V6. !CIF.UIIFIC L0.49d.37 LAB SUPPLIES 07-153 VALLIY CITIES SUPPLY Cc. 1,81.17 PIPE SUPPLIES 4751t4 VAL41. SCPVICCS. INf. I11%.••3 VALVE REPAIRS -C75155 - VVRTFV RUSFINiSS iRlrufcF` 0.4MI10. OFFICE FURNITURE .P • FUND NO :� Jr :1S1 .L•.K IN: ..1 li>L ` P..Pi! C S1'P ItL', •-'/•• ,A(I • • P•F C'Pl }JC•IL- (F 4: C Al.IY :•A L:1 IN 1100 - I SI,!IC TS OF OF ANGI. COIMI TY E L11MS f410 :;/2e/bS YAPRANT NO. V-NOOF 011-IUNT r!.iL6I✓IIOW ----675156 WAUKESMA ±KCIWE SenVIf,L.Il.r S1f6.KA ENGINE PARTS 075157 WESTERN HIGHWAY PIIOPUCT6, I.C. 456-4 SAFETY SUPPLIES 075158 WESTERN WVOLESALC C^. lIP2.59 TRUCK PARTS —046169 -- ----- --. !.. WHEISTONE A A5EUCIATIS 12,712.K7 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES_DIST 16 07SI60 PUSSELL NOLU %43.P7 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 5 1.75341 POORKE. 6 WOGORUFF $14.634.40 LEGAL SERVICES —176162 - Y_PUY CORP. $3,118.74 COPIER LEASE L75163 LEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCI61F5 L93R.94 VALVES -75164 EVE: F,T1 H. YORK CO. 1610.56 ENGINE PARTS 74166 - JOHN C.-EON,-JR. - 1158.20 DIRECTORS COMPENSATION 6 MILEAGE 1175166 SAL S4IIFA E79.92 DIRECTORS COMPENSATION 6 MILEAGE ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID :i6/2C/25 $698.048.20 SUMMARY AMOUNT x /1 OPER FUND $ 6. 573.72 —! /2 ACO FUND 5.453.70 to /2 F/R FUND 6,177.62 rt—/3-OPER-FUND_—_-___... _.._-_._ _ 10,881.87 V1 /3 ACO FUND 455.37 /5 OPER FUND 4.606.03 #9 ACO FUND . . 3,556.24 /6 OPER FUND 21.00 /7 OPER FUND 4,596.37 /7.F/R.FUND -. - 2,274.08 /11 OPER FUND 10,563.28 /13 OPER FUND 93.80 913-ACO-FUND----------- ._-..._. .. 567.00 /14 SUSPENSE FUND 4,138.22 /566 OPER FUND 2,507.86 ._-4566 ACO FUND 5,555.40 /697 OPER FUND 1,696.61 JT OPER FUND 331,958.81 _CDBF__ . 202,852.56 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 2,974.80 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 8o,o61.49 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/26/85 $698,048.28 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 ,J OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , July 11, 1985, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7.30 p.m., July 18, 1985 at the Santa Ana City Council Chambers for a public hearing re collecting sewer service charges on the 1985-86 property tax bills. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m., July 10, 1985. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, 1985 for a joint meeting to consider the final EIR on the proposed formation of District No. 14. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m., July 10, 1985. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, 1985 for a joint meeting to consider the final EIR on the proposed formation of District No. 14. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m., July 10, 1985. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, 1985 for a joint meeting to consider the final EIR on the proposed formation of District No. 14. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m. , July 10, 1985. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, 1985 for a joint meeting to consider the final EIR on the proposed formation of District No. 14. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:49 p.m. , July 10, 1985. Excerpts - Continued Page Two DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, 1985 for a joint meeting to consider the final EIR on the proposed formation of District No. 14. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:50 p.m., July 10, 1985. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, 1985 for a joint meeting to consider the final EIR on the proposed formation of District No. 14. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:50 p.m. , July 10, 1985. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 24, 1985 for a joint meeting to consider the final EIR on the proposed formation of District No. 14. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:50 p.m. , July 10, 1985. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of minute entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the loth day of July, 1985. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this loth day of July, 1985. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 21 3, 5, 61 7, 11 and 13 V Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Final Environmental Impact Report June 1985 e' nG og . P4M t y l�( 0 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY �rN�rnr.on Gp�'YGE cooN4� r r r m r FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SCH # 84051616 r JOINT TREATMENT WORKS WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN Lead Agency: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County r 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Val ley, CA 92708 Contact Person : Ms. Hilary Baker r (714) 540-2910 Mailing Address : P.O. Box 8127 .� Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 r Prepared by: r K. P. Lindstrom & Associates 1177 Brownwyk Drive Sacramento , CA 95822 Contact Person : Mr. Kris Lindstrom (916) 447-5893 June, 1985 r r r r r TABLE OF CONTENTS r Includes Figures and Tables Item Paae Preface 1 Introduction 1 m Proof of Publication 2 Notice of Public Hearing - 3 COMMENTS OF THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 4 ,r Response to City of Fountain Valley Comments (#1-25) 7 Response to Comment #1 7 Response to Comment #2 14 Response to Comment #3 15 Table 1 - Relationship Between Five Year and Twenty Year Planning Horizons in Terms of Proposed Facility - Needs at the CSDOC Joint Works Treatment Plants 16 Response to Comments #4-7 17 Corrections to DEIR Table II-9 18 Response to Comments #8-9 19 Response to Comments #10 20 Response to Comment #11 21 Table 2 - Proposed Changes in Facility Needs 22 Table 3 - Anticpated Changes in Operations at Plant No. 1 r and Joint Works Facilities 23 Response to Comment #12-13 25 Response to Comment #14 26 Response to Comments #15-17 27 ` Table 4 - Prposed Implementation Schedule for Compliance with Rule 1110. 1 29 Response to Comments #18-19 30 r Table 5 - Estimated Air Pollutant Emissions from Existing CSDOC Operations 31 Response to Comments #21-24 34 r Response to Comments #25 35 COMMENTS OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (#26-28) 36 Response to Comments #26-28 37 COMMENTS OF COUNTY OF ORANGE (#29-35) 39 r Response to Comments #29-31 40 Response to Comments #32 41 Response to Comments #33-34 42 ,r Table 6 (Revision to Table IV-2 of DEIR) - Estimated Air Pollutant Emissions Associated with Proposed Treatment Facility Improvements. 43 Response to Comments #35 44 COMMENTS OF ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (#36) 46 Response to Comment #36 47 COMMENTS OF SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (#37-47) 48 - Response to Comments #37-38 49 Figure 1 - Cogeneration Alternative Heat Recovery Schematic 50 r Response to Comment #39 51 Figure 2 - Implementation Schedule for Digester Gas Utilization Study 52 r r L I ' Table of Contents (continued) Figure 3 - Emissions Comparison of Existing Engines w Versus Cogeneration Facility 53 Response to Comment #40 53 Response to Comment *41 55 LO Table 7 -Estimated Power Plant Emissions after Implementation of CSDOC Cogeneration Facility 55 Response to Comments *42-45 55 Response to Comments $46-47 56 References 56 V V W i r Yd V LL YO I L r I L L V L PREFACE This Final Environmental Impact Report consists of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) and a supplement which _+ includes copies of the comments received on the DEIR and responses to those comments. This supplement, and the Draft EIR (incorporated herein by reference) , constitute the Final EIR on the Joint Works Wastewater Master Plan of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) which is the project proponent d, and Lead Agency under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. CSDOC hired an environmental consultant K. P. Lindstrom & Associates (K. P. Lindstrom, Inc.) to prepare the Draft and Fianl r EIR's. The cost of this environmental work which was authorized by the CSDOC Boards of Directors pursuant to Resolutions 84-31 (DEIR) and 85-46 (Final EIR and supplemental work) totalled $49,935 . r ,r d r i r INTRODUCTION TO SUPPLEMENT TO DRAFT EIR This supplement includes the comments and responses on the Draft EIR for the Joint Works Wastewater Master Plan of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. The Draft was initially published in March of 1984 and had the State Clearinghouse Number 84051616. Six written communications, five of which had specific comments on the DEIR, were received from the following agencies: STATE OF CALIFORNIA Office of Planning and Research (State EIR Clearinghouse) 'tl NOTE: THIS LETTER ACKNOWLEDGES COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. NO STATE r AGENCIES COMMENTED ON THE DRAFT EIR. CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COUNTY OF ORANGE r Environmental Management Agency - Environmental Analysis Division General Services Agency - Waste Management Program r ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT r No oral comments were made at the Public Hearing held April 10,1985 at 7:30 P.M. at the Districts' Administrative Offices in Fountain Valley, California. Copies of the notice of publication r, and public notice posted at the District's administrative office in Fountain Valley, California are attached. This document contains the following: -Copies of the Notice of Publication and Public Notice posted at the District ' s administrative office in r Fountain Valley, California. -Copies of each of the written comments received which are listed above,and r -Responses to the comments received. r Each communication is addressed in the order listed above. To assist the reader, each individual comment has been assigned a reference number and the responses are provided based on the r reference numbers listed in the margins of each comment letter. Where appropriate , responses to comments are cross- referenced if the response provided is applicable to addressing r more than one comment. r 1 This space it for the County Clark's Filing Sta L W PROOF OF PUBLICATION i v 1201S.S C.C.P.! 1 ' i lr STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 1 J` a LEG- NCTICB County of Orange, Pree{ of publication of JUi gITA FOLKE.r2TS I am a cifisen of the United States and a resident of u I Notice of Public earirc and y , the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above Environmental Impact Report eefiflod matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of The Register, a newspaper of general cir. LWAL NOTICII mmI be wsuc cula}ion, published in the City of Santa Ana, County badde eaeM1"'rleOOC^�^ prlpNw n."WrKr of Orange, and which newspaper has been adjudged t.'p,Kc Y'r' v WYI"'iva's.W-a rMM a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior m OIAePlsxauw t 4e j Court of the County of Orange, State of California, gIQ hc�l:b�1'K'"ir.l.� v W I ' 9Y under the date of November 29, 1905, Case Num. "IIU. Il�egfC"b•pw�n�Wnadlri yyam� IOryt.IM•1 I P If71e1 P.G111�e."'nib j nd bar A21046; that the nefiea of which the annexed uaN lal aMr.Ids, W A bill ads, mbv. w is a'printed copy, has bon published in each rag- II�q'ry"41nM°a I. y €OYnI,•m3:11__ •Ill• ,'P`�I" 'e'•• ular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in 191wl eul•wtem5:r.°nP';iI any supplement thereof on the followingdata%, to- lo�ir7s:v:xP.m.mem.ma q wane cemm•mt cwr s.J wit; Inds,I M axumml aeP.•. m m• Me•IaI .wn.0 Ioa.alee a m 11. l e��m I .arvml Pil` , nava afa•Wl�`tcnmlmura V .wtlb fl'fP.�il'° .. March 21 , 1985 wn PT"In bl.m•u,'8'I'a mWl PInes oawm.m•. la Kt• I 111[I, Mai MU mffO anma,r IJO�1 all w1.11 CWl1., , InIM all Plant Ne. ]. a,M OWr WIImI usulnn eM had Mw MryY PrWuc M leCllb IIO ( Iry PW GIN r pa�pal nYmee}a oNnu.P 1Wn en1�1M IO icMcnmmWt)'U lm CnsW Ibrt I,IOT ryT'tenualplEe5:) - ..�:m.l ImWaI X.PoIi• M•mYWnenq IM Pnmerv. �Iym�pMa.IM oitN 1.'llw•pcPOMryICirl'iq`a Irani) j MM"aNi/Plin$IWIM br Opp) le, I certify for declare) under penalty of perjury that ml.1 it le nll.M,W uia Mip art .1qW IMI Igid the foregoing is true and correct Lnw mmt0 heW,,Iryy MWMNs, Imwcl'j{(.^Pell, LI' Executed at Santa Ana, California. n'yso i ''W"illm'°On dtlMi"it IpY'ell� AWM..Mi d:in..INv.arY IOW M.awavalln. w InY Ilv Mlnbmull'nenc March 22s 85 frSI. O1W.1EIa—T Date .................._....... .._.....�...........__..., 19_........ PSI°iM`l0 tram rill ' .ad '•I IM Ole/ICN'ParW or PY O n I.I aal'er 1I ICT�JOP TMa IWI Signature IA;Tn;- IAN IT 4T.ION UAITA POLKERTS L 2 [ i [ i [ i [ [ i 1 i [ i [ i a i i 1 ^ 'COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS a0auv Lawn Luc4xu wun —u•4 wx+na All interacts, pwere. we mental to attend saM hesri, and express M vaw. sae IDTICE OF HEARXe6 AND n imnxo� Neir opinions relatiwa to the Draft Ervlraaaental la act, Report. Said tdCU4}A AVAIIABlI RE URAPf 0iVDW40 n D PACT RQPJRf MR 6 WITUEN 0vixmoo,to, L¢act Report and Master Plan Retort are available for oj!F,Ni R OF 4UtLE mW1Y .Mori VIFJD!®rf WRKS MAgIEaEEt IFSdfR PLAN iro,rocim in the office of the Secretary of the Diatcicte at 10844 Ellis STAT¢QIIAINFIDIEE #8051616 Awcom, tcat&is Valley, aM my be camaimd by any interested (erase. NorrC4 1S HEIFBr GIVEN Nat a Draft Ervlrmmentel aspect Report dated further infat etim m a ropy of the Draft Ervicvmmtel la act March, 1985 has been prepared for N. Master Plan for Joint works Report my te obtain from Eller, eater at the Districts' office or by Treece t And Disposal Facilities and is available to the general public tele{tamin9 (ylt) 540-2910 or %2-2411. for crvia. A pblic heerbg will to held on Ne dowrent in Ne mazds W WEA CdF M f1NR05 OF OIeFL90Rs of mEI1Y w of Directors neeti, ,teen of Ne Ibmty Sani"tice Districts, 10844 all. sANWMI0N D1SIRi W. 1, 2, Au , Fowwain Valley toAUdaesdaY, April 10, 1985 at Ta10 p.m, in order cou,rY6, 1J OWLE W.ED U ennm to accept public comments concerning the donRmt. Te purpose of the Master Plan Report was m detelop a phased Pita J. Erato, Secretary inenrowenent program for mns[[uctlon of treatment plant projects to insure ade•Pmte facilities to get the wastewater into, thrr gh aM out of Ne Plants aM to met r Julatory requirements. projects include a Iva, headvorks aN 24 IYR) primary treetsest capacity at Plant W. 1, a ne+ mt- fall Custer station at Plant No. 2, and odor mMrol facilities and new energy ProlucLg facilities (u in, surplus digester gas) w both Plants. Projects will inpfoee treatmet oparations aM enable the Districts b commdete L•cramed flows from developients approved by Ne local cities and pwmey. 'Ae fTvirawmtai impact Report has investigated Ne primary and semrl ry inpacts of the proposed projects axi altermtims coslderel in the Master Plan Report aml post-Master Plan Studies for odor control mad energy was. I WTA1# CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY L c CITY WALL 1020D SLATER AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9010E County Sanitation Districts O !! I Of Orange County FROM THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Apr11 29, 1985 Fyn Page 2 At the City Council meeting of May 9, INES, the City Council will April 29, 1985 CCSD hear comments from the consultant that prepared the report (attached) C and may Possibly make Additional comments. My comments made by the Council members will be included In letter form and forwarded to your District on May S. Mr. Richard Edgar The City realize. that a complete description of the project and Joint Chairman full attention to the mitigation measures of the project axe a must County Sanitation Districts it the SIR on the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan is of Orange County to be deemed acceptable to the City Of Fountain Valley. P.O. Box B127 Fountain Valley, CA 52728-8127 The Cit of Fountain Valley is striving to ensure that the effects of the expansion of the plant in Fountain Valley are environmentally SUBJECT, EIR JOINT TREATMENT WORKS WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN sound, aesthetically pleasing and will not adversely affect the Deer Joint Chairman Ed residents of Fountain Valley and the City an a whole. gar, We hope these comments and your response to them will result In The City of Fountain Valley appreciates the opportunity to review a document which clearly ..Film.. the Oi.trlct's commitment to the Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and submits minimize or eliminate the environmental effects of the project. the following comments. ' Very truly your., The EIR demonstrates a significant effort to analyze the impacts of the project. However, we have two general areas of concern, .'CIT,Y OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY' 1. '1Te Lption oP the vIoject d [he svociPied fecilitlae `/� c the EIR. ° uatas n as w. In nner t e mpaTi �ctsaced wllh providing treatment Paclll[lea ary to sere anticipated regional needs for a 20-year BEN NIELSEN #�. period." The EIR also analyzes specific projects to meet Mayor need on a 5-year basis, to 1989. The precise approvals that are red by this EIR should be clarified. Some of the EIR BN/DB/mb discussion covers population growth end need projections for the 20-year period. However, since only 5-year projects are Attachment, Consultant's Report analyzed, it is unclear whet actions the EIR is meant to ad- dress. If future environmental documents are anticipated for to, City C....il the 5-year period after 1989, this should be noted in the EIR. 2. The wordSng of the mitigation asu which na ds lari tlee[Son n the imvmmancien I "I not eE y a17�a t mitigation a and the impacts Of duet, biotic resources, transportation, noise, nuisance factors, geology, oil., eelsml- 2 city, air quality and mlcroclima to impact., visual/scenic q.all- ties and resources. The City expects these aspects will all be fully addressed and discussed in the final EIR. fl 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 fl fl 1 fl 1 ( l 1 ! 1 1 COMMENTS OX EIR 2. Headwnrks Lacil itr Page 111-3. TMs section refers to a new JOINT TPEATMFM VORKS he,dworAs of 100 MD. The section also slates that Phase 1 NASTEVATFR MASTER PLAX would provide a 50 MGD capacity. When the 50 MIT is added to #� Me Present 60 MD. a total of 110 MGD capacity is provided. The capacity figures should be clarified. A. IMRDDOCTION 3. Neadworks Fac111ty. Peas 111-a. TM last paragraph refers to tr 1. Page 1-2. The EIR 'evaluates in a general manner the impacts 18 serving 10 NGD of the 30 NGD ultimate Flows from SPNPA. Are associated with providing treatment facilities necessary to the facilities addressed in the EIR adequate for the ultimate serve anticipated regional needs for a 20-year period.' The 1 30 NO from SAWPA} k3 FIR also analyzes sppecific projects to met needs on a five- year balls (to 19R9). The precise approvals that are covered a. Flectelcal 0.el lahility. Page 11]-B. This section refers to a by this EIR should be clarified. Some of the EIR discussion new substat ton on Red awtlon Plant Ho. I. The environmental covers population growth and need projections for the 20-year #9 Impacts of the substation do not appear to Da addressed in the period, however, since only flue-year projects are analyzed. EIR. Is the substation included in the facilities covered it Is unclear what actions the EIR Is want to address. If under the Master Plan} If not, what approval process will the future environmental documents are anticipated for the five- substation undergo} year period after 1989, this should be noted in the EIR. S. Sweet, of Pro,oI,d Facilities at Reclammitim Plant No. 1. Pan, R. EXVIROMNEMAL SETTING 111,18. This section states, 'No additional treatment faclli- Iles beyond primary treatment are proposed at the present time, 1. Regional Socioeconomic fnv irgnwnt. Table 11-9. The number, 1 1Q nor am any ultimate solids disyosal projects.' Does this man In the table do not correspond to Us total acre? a shown. that the proposed facilities addressed in the EIR are adequate 1 4 Also, Developed Lands apypears to be a subcategory gip Undeval. for the 20-year projected needs for primary treatment} (We oped Lands; this should be clarified. i understand a separate EIR will be prepared for solid, dis- posal.) 2. --�@ tThision section refers to field ohese o is observations tray s fichould cebe provided. The source and data of D. A59E55MFM OF INPACT9/XITIGATIOX XFASIIRES 1$ theta observations should be provided. A ent Is made that during mid-day, traffic appears to moveowe at frw-flm 1. Dust Nltlgati on Measures Paoe IV-}. This section states that coact it Milo m do not question this, the wpedlpg of the miss one will be reduced by simyle control methods. However, atatewnl raises questions as to Aow the {nfowatien was few the wording of the rest of this section, it is unclear derived. 111 what mitigation will actually be Implemented as part of the C. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED FACILITIES Project. 1 2. . This section 1. --' Three of the facilities show a number of items '( states that additional landscaping is recommended. Whet 1 6 p ul s u uro items (bar screens - 3 L 2 future). Me the future l 12 additional landscaping will be incorporated Into the project} item for the 20-year facilities? The relationship of the facilities shown on the table to the five-year and 20-year 3. - Tha EIR facility needs should be clarified. states that a sfgna ized east entry gate to a m direct Iran. 1 !13 ay off-ramp access to the plant muld some to mitigate such impacts. The feasibility and time from for such an access 1 I 2 should be discussed. Alternative mitigation should be provided the measures at be tied to implementation with the project or in the event that this access is not constructed. phases of the project. #13 This section also states that a traffic management plan should 10. i - . The be developed. A clear statement that the measure will be #20 EIR states that additional efforts tg visually enhance the plant (cont implemented should be provided in the Final EIR. sit. should continua ....• Ara these typos of measures proposed 4. Noise Mitioation Measures Pate IV-Ire The mitigation refers as part of the project? to several items that should be done. The actual caesuras 11. Public Services and Utilities. Panes IV-39 and IV-40. No refer- #14 which will be incorporated into the project should be noted in an is made <o fire-figM1[inB faci It ties. Ara adequate facill. m the Final EIR. Specific requirements for noise mitigation if #2 1 ties and personnel available to serve the expanded facility and piledrivers are used should be clearly listed in the EIR. chemical storage? 5. Nuisance Facto s. Paoe 1V-23. The second paragraph refers to 12. Transportation, Pace IV-40. The EIR states that there will be a odor control and states the District's staff ill make every 0-percent increase in truck and automobile traffic over exist. #15 effort to minimize this impact when tie-ins are made. Mare #2 2 ing operations. Will this create any capacity problems at detailed mitigation, such as a list of the specific actions the intersections in the vicinity? staff will make, are needed to adequately mitigate the Impact. 13. Transportation pate IV-41. The EIR defers transportation, the 6. - . this section states that #2 3 Cation to the Ultimate Solids Study EIS/EIR. Therefore, the lique action is a potential concern at Plant 1, however, no C i ty of Fountain Valley is interested in reviewing that Draft #16 pit lgatlon amasuran are provided for liquefaction. _ I EIR when it is available. T, Air Quality and Ni crecl'mate Impacts. Pate IV-30. This section 14. Noise. Page IV-42. Traffic noise impacts of the project are not states that, •full covers and scrubbing facilities in the new guantlfied. We suggest that traffic noise impacts be addressed #17 headworks will mitigate potential impacts of expansion.• No #24 based an the traffic analysis in the future Ultimate Solids quantification of existing and future plant emissions is pro- Study EIS/EIR. vided other than the reduction in hydrogen sulfide emissions. 0n Page IV-31, the EIR refers to detailed estimates to be made 15. GIUL measures, Pages IV-52 to at a later data when the engines are approved. 1f this EIR Is 1V-5)- There are some eferences in this section to handling intended to address the Impacts of the engines, more details on #2 5 and storage practices for the chemicals used at the plant. the impacts should be provided. It is unclear how the emis- Hanover, there Is me analysis of Increased hazards to nearby sines data oe Table IV-2 relate to these engines referenced on residences or measures which the District has adopted to Page I11-31. minimize potential chemical spills. B. 'Air ,Quality and Nicrpd lost.. Table IV-2. Footnotes 3 and 4 I refer to Table III-20, a%ever, there is no such table in the #19 EIR. 9. Alr Oualitr. Mitigation Measures, Pam IV-33. A number of #19 mi[igatipn measures are listed, however, it is unclear hw and Men tM1ey will be implemented. To provide adequate mitigation, 3 4 b r RESPONSE TO CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY COMMENTS (Responses i1-25) . Response to General Comment #1 The precise "approvals" that are covered by this EIR are the approval of environmental documentation in the form of a Final EIR on the Joint Works Wastewater Master Plan for the County r Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) by the Districts' Board of Directors. This EIR prepared by CSDOC, serving as the Lead Agency, addresses the impacts of implementing a phased program for construction of treatment plant projects to insure adequate facilities to handle projected wastewater flows and meet r various regulatory requirements. The regulatory requirements include specific limitations for effluent quality, compliance with applicable air quality regulations, as well as general r "community" and District environmental quality objectives to reduce odor problems, improve the visual appearance of the treatment plants, and maximize the efficiency of operations in terms of energy consumption, chemical use and labor. A more precise listing of the projects addressed in this EIR .. are delineated below as is the the relationship between the five- year project planning horizon and specific projects and the r twenty year planning period covered in the Master Plan. The projects specifically addressed in this EIR were listed in Table III-1 (for Plant No.1 in Fountain Valley) and Table III-2 (for Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach) of the DEIR. The projects r listed include some very specific projects (is odors hoods for belt filter presses and the covers and scrubbers for primary clarifiers) as well as some conceptual projects whose preliminary designs as presented in the DEIR are subject to change as a 7 L W result of detailed design studies. These major projects include W anew headworks facility at Plant #1 anew outfal l booster pump station for effluent disposal at Plant A2 and centralized power L generating facilities to make maximum use of digester gas and assure complince with new air pollution control regulation. The parameters which are likely to change during the more detailed r design studies will include number and type of engines or motors in the headworks and. outfall booster station, and the type of Y�I engines and turbines which will be used in the electrical power generating stations at each plant along with the type of air r pollution control equipment required to achieve Best Available Control Technology and compliance with the latest regulations in effect at the time that an actual permit to construct is filed) . W The listing of projects is based on the best available planning information available at the time of DEIR preparation. While the California Environmental Quality Act requires specific environmental disclosure for decision making,some of the ultimate decisions on whether a project will be implemented or not must be L based on specific project approvals from other agencies having discretionary authority over certain project components. Of W particular interest is the air pollution control aspects of any of the proposed projects and the need to obtain permits both to y construct and operate any new projects which will emit air pollutants above a certain baseline level. Specific projects proposed are listed and depicted in W Figures 3 and 4 of the Executive Summary and Tables III-1 and III-2 of the DEIR and include the following types of projects: 8 W BASIC HYDRAULIC NEEDS - These projects are intended to get collected wastewaters tributary to each of the treatment plants into, through and out of the treatment plants while m preventing overflows of untreated sewage, the need to bypass ,b partially treated sewage, inadequate treatment thus violating waste discharge requirements,and to assure that operations can be maintained during peak storm flows, electrical failures, or other unusual or infrequent events. OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY NEEDS - These improvements to the two treatment plants are designed to upgrade existing facilities to improve efficiency (is reduce energy or chemical use) and to d optimize waste heat recovery generated by existing engine-drive equipment. r ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION NEEDS - Several major projects are proposed to provide specific environmental improvements and s mitigate existing impacts. These projects resulted from special ,r studies undertaken to evaluate odors (Malcolm Pirnie, 1984a and 1984b) and maximizing the use of methane gas generated by sludge digestion while at the same time achieving overall air pollutant emission reductions from plant operations (John Carollo W Engineers, 1985). r The specific projects addressed by this EIR include the following: Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley BASIC HYDRAULIC NEEDS - New enclosed headwarks building .. containing 100 mgd of pumping capacity (average) to be installed in increments, the first of which will be about 50 mgd. The r headwarks will include sufficient pumping capacity to handle peak 9 hydraulic Plows which are about twice average flows. The 1 W headworks will be sized to allow incremental installation over a twenty year period of the process units needed to handle 100 mgd iW W of average Plow. The first major project elements to be i constructed within the five year project period addressed in this •+ EIR, will be the construction of the entire in-ground structure to contain all future (twenty year planning horizon) Porebays and other support facilities to accomodate these projected flows. W Initially, to support five year needs, three bar screens and Pour grit chambers will be constructed along with standby electrical L generating capacity, three new chlorinators and a 5,000 gallon bulk storage container, and foul air containment and scrubbing equipment . ! Four new rectangular clarifiers capable of treating an average flow of 6 mgd each (total new installed capacity of 24 mgd will be constructed bringing Plant #1 primary treatment capacity total to 70 mgd). u The addition of two new 110-foot diameter anaerobic sludge digesters and major electrical distribution and wiring r improvments to be capable of meeting future demands and peak load v demands for new odor scrubbing equipment and future facilities. OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY NEEDS - These will include new L aeration equipment (diffusers) improvements to the existing I secondary treatment aeration system to reduce blower demands and 6' hence save energy, improved heat recovery systems on existing L engines, a new more efficient boiler facility to provide heated water for sludge digestion and other plant needs, and an improved L 10 W I L system for the clean-up (sulfur reduction) and distribution (to ,r points of use) of digester gas. These improvements are designed to optimize energy use and minimize purchases of electrical power from the Southern California Edison Company (the Districts are presently one of the largest users of electicity in the County). r ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION NEEDS - Included in this category are improvements needed to mitigate existing environmental impacts largely related to the generation of odors caused by ,d hydrogen sulfide gas emissions released to the atmosphere from the large surface areas exposed during the primary treatment process (uses large uncovered circular or rectangular basins) and the emission of gasesous pollutants from numerous internal r combustion engines. Included are improvements .to the existing prechlorination system (new chlorinators and as bulk storage tank) , covers and odorous gas scrubbing facilities to be retrofitted on each of the primary clarifiers, bar screens and grit chambers and solids dewatering building and construction of r a new energy generating system to maximize use of surplus digester gas and/or eliminate the construction of individual engines to burn digester gas in the future. These centralized facilities, if built as planned and approved by the Air Quality Management District, would be more efficient, able to achieve air pollutant emission regulations more effectively, and reduce the need to flare surplus digester gas generated from sludge collected from the treatment processes. r 11 V Treatment Plant No 2 in Huntington Beach V BASIC HYDRAULIC NEEDS - A new 480 mgd outfall booster pump station to discharge treated effluent to the ocean outfall is r, proposed at Plant *2. This facility would replace an existing pump station which is nearing the end of its useful life. Also one of the existing surge towers would be extended some fifteen feet in height to meet hydraulic demands of pumping against tidally related pressures. Two new pumps in Headworks C and new r flap gates for the discharge bypass to the Santa Ana River to prevent flood flows from entering the outfall pumping system are �+ also proposed. OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY NEEDS - New odorous gas collection r hoods on the belt filter presses and improved ventilation in the I - r solids handling building are proposed. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION NEEDS - Similar to Plant No.l this L, category would include a centralized energy generating facility and odor control facilities. All fifteen existing primary clarifiers and the sludge dewatering building would be retrofitted with odor control facilities (covers and scrubbers) at an estimated cost of $21.5 million. Also, a trunk line y scrubbing system and consideration of surge tower covers is proposed. L Service Area Growth-Related Needs The Master Plan EIR addressed the projected growth-related needs of the present CSDOC service area for the next 20 years. V However, since the Districts have traditionally built or improved facilities on an as-needed pay-as-you-go basis, facility 13 Ir V improvments for only a five year planning horizon are actually addressed in detail (except for the major facilities now proposed consisting of an outfall booster station at Plant #2 , a new headworks at Treatment Plant #1, and centralized power generating facilities at each treatment plant. Keeping the longer term d period in mind during planning helps focus attention on matching r land use changes and trunk sewer collection projects with treatment capacity needs. Such long term planning helps determine the maximum efficiency of use of land at the plants (determining optimum layouts) , the sizing of modular units or r improvements to maximize efficiency in both design and construction and aids in making decisions regarding piping, r electrical support facilities, landscaping, flood protection, ,r vehicular access and roadways,etc. However, the long-term treatment facilities (beyond five years) and future short-term needs for new improvements (evaluated during each Master Plan update occurring about every five years) r will again be the subject of another Master Plan update and environmental review (EIR) in about five years. Such periodic r reviews and evaluation of facility needs is expected to continue into the next century. Special studies to evaluate a particular need or facility and prepare the appropriate planning, engineering or environmental documents can occur at any time a need arises and the budgetary authority and selection of r consultants is approved by the District's Boards of Directors. r Response to General Comment #2 regarding Mitigation Measures At the time of preparation of the DEIR, only preliminary .. pre-design engineering studies had been undertaken to determine 14 r i the preliminary sizing, location, and costs of alternatives to V treat projected flows, assure reliability, and mitigate existing environmental impacts. The impacts associated with construction L, of the beat apparent alternative for each facility type (is headworks configuration, outfall booster station, primary clari£iers,etc) were addressed in the DEIR. Other facilities •r were also identified and described in a general manner (is anaerobic digesters, power station, centralized electrical generating facilities and odor mitigation covers and scrubbers). i General types of mitigation measures were recommended or u described in the DEIR. A specific request for a more complete discussion of actual y mitigation measures that will be implemented was requested by the u City of Fountain Valley. In response to that request , discussions were held with District staff by the consultant and specific commitments on the implementation of certain mitigation measures were obtained. Some measures were also discussed with the District's Board's of Directors Executive Committee. These i v measures are described in the sections to follow which address the individual measures which the City requested be clarified. y Response to Comment #3 The requested clarification was responded to in the response y to Comment #1. To clarify the facilities which are being addressed in the five-year Master Plan period addressed in this EIR versus the twenty year planning horizon discussed above in v Comment #2 , the reader is referred to Table 1 which lists and compares the proposed and planned facilities for these two periods. L 15 L Table 1 ,r Relationship Between Five Year and Twenty Year Planning Horizons in Terms of Proposed Facility Needs at the CSDOC Joint Works Treatment Plants Proposed New Facilities Identified in 1983 MasterPlan Present Joint Works 5-year Year 2003 Facility increment Total Nominal Rated Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1 - 46 mgd 24 mgd 84 mgd Plant No . 2 - 186 mgd 0 0 New Plant No. 1 Headworks up to 80 mgd 100 mgd r Bar screens 3 5 Raw sewage pumps 3 4 Grit removal basins 4 4 Foul air control system 1 1 Prechlorination 3 4 Plant No. 1 Facilities Primary sedimentation 4 @ 6 mgd 14 @ 6 mgd Sludge digestion tanks 1 2 Sludge thickeners 0 3 Aeration basins* 0 6 Secondary clarifiers* 0 10 Belt filter presses 0 3 Electrical 'generating facility 1 @ 2700 kw 1 @ 2700 kw r Plant No. 2 Facilities Outfall Booster Pump Station 480 mgd 480 mgd s, Extend existing surge tower 15 ft. 15 ft . Flap gates on river discharge 2 2 Headworks C pump replacement 2 @ 48 mgd 2 @ 48 mgd r Clarifier covers and scrubbers 15 15 Other support Facilities Interplant effluent pipeline 0 1 Odor control facilities under design as needed Sludge trucks 1 4 Electrical reliability projects under design as needed y Environmental mitigation projects as identified as needed * The facilities shown assume new air activated sludge facilities will be need (worst case since they use the most land) .. rather than conversion to pure oxygen or chemical addition to primary clarifiers. 16 L Response to Comment #4 1 v The comments made about the acreage figures presented in Table II-9 were reviewed and corrections were made to reflect the L recent changes related to District #13 and to show that developable lands are a subcategory of presently undeveloped lands. These changes are shown on page 16 in a corrected version r ' of Table II-9. Response to Comment #5i ' y The field observations described were made by Kris Lindstrom during frequent visits to the Districts as well as discussions 4 with CSDOC staff whose offices face Ellis Avenue (Tom Dawes and Hilary Baker) . Note that in the late afternoon traffic also V intensifies. No detailed traffic studies are available or have v been done as part of this EIR. Response to Comment #6 r The future items specified are for the 20- year planning horizon. For an explanation and clarification of the facilities proposed, the reader is referred to Table 1 described in the r response to comment #3. Response to Comment #7 v The proposed new headworks will be constructed to provide capacity for an eventual nominally rated flow capacity of 100 mgd L (See Comment #1 response). At present, it is planned to provide a first increment of 50 mgd or more up to as much as 80 mgd. Actual sizing will depend upon the size of pumps which are most L cost effective and the incremental size of engines or motors which are selected. No final determination has yet been made on L 17 61 I.� i CORRECTIONS TO DEIR TABLE TABLE II-9 CSDOC CURRENT SERVICE AREA LAND USE s, LAND USE ACRES Residential 91,085 Commercial 17,873 1� Industrial 16,221 J Transportation, ,d Communication & Utilities 5,552 Military 6,587 Schools 8,808 Jam' Public Service 2,953 11 Open Space 21,291 Extractive 5,403 1 TOTAL DEVELOPED k0t7773 175,773 UNDEVELOPED lands -94-949- 50 ,312 bi Developda Lands 33 ,768 Undevelopable -4734&- 16,544 Water --6_372- TOTAL ACREAGE 226,085 r r r r 18 L the actual capacity of the first increment (based on equipment installation) , but the in-ground structure will contain �+ sufficient forebays and be sized to accomodate up to 100 mgd of L .nominal flow. Response to Comment #8 Yr i No. The EIR addressed the addition of 24 mgd of new primary treatment capacity over the next five years. This increment y includes additional capacity of up to 7 mgd for flows from the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) . SAWPA has had an agreement with the Districts for the pruchase of cup to 30 mgd of V capacity in the Joint Works Facilities which was signed over a decade ago. At present, they own 8 mgd of capacity in the Joint Works. Thus the addition of 7 mgd of additional capacity would bring SAWPA-s total contract flow capacity and ownership up to 15 I.0 mgd of the ultimate 30 mgd to which they are entitled under their L present agreement with the Districts. In the future (beyond the five year period addressed in this Ir EIR) , an additional 15 mgd of capacity may be constructed to serve SAWPA-s contractual obligations. The need for this additional capacity and scheduling of construction will be evaluated during the next Master Plan update and accompanying EIR V which will be initiated in about 1987 or 1988. L Response to Comment #9 The new substation described was included in the 5-year planning, but actually is scheduled for possible construction beyond the five year planning period. However the new odor L scrubbing facilities proposed under this EIR may create power demands which will warrant making this modification sooner than I � 19 `" L expected, and it may be made by construction of a more ® centralized switching station which would be part of the m centralized power generating facilities. As presently proposed,this substation would consist of the addition of some transformers and electrical lines to the existing building. The impacts would be minimal and consist of construction of a concrete pad, installation of transformers and underground wiring. A tall chainlink fence with barbed wire r around the top would probable be constructed. The need for such a facility will be addressed as part of the electrical reliability project. Response to Comment #10 What is proposed is construction of 24 mgd of primary r treatment to serve present CSDOC service area and SAWPA contractual needs for the next five years. No additonal secondary treatment is proposed. Primary and secondary effluents from both plants will be blended to achieve required ocean discharge limitations specified in CSDOC's NPDES Permit. If the blending of effluents is not sufficient to meet the limitations (this is not expected at this time) , the the Districts have proposed other means of meeting the requirements. These measures were discussed on page D-11 of the DEIR. In addition, the possible construction of another 6 mgd �+ clarifier will be necessary to accommodate flows from a new - - service area (District #14) which is the subject of another current EIR on its formation and facility needs. This EIR was distributed in April 1985 and the subject of a public hearing d 20 L held June 12, 1985. Some modifications to the sizing and/or scheduling of the proposed Master Plan facilities (is incremental enlargements of the proposed headworks and support facilities, V addition of the primary clarifier, etc.) are proposed if the formation of District *14 occurs. A description of specific L , changes that that EIR addressed and their impacts as summarized . from the District 14 DEIR (Michael Brandman & Associates, 1985) are summarized in Tables 2 and 3 provided for information only. r The facilities needed to accomodate District #14 are not the subject of this EIR. u Resoonse to Comment #11 Control of dust during construction is normally mitigated by L, watering as needed. If done on a twice daily basis, watering has been shown to reduce dust emissions by about 50 percent. CSDOC's V 1984 contract General Provisions and Standard Specifications L require that a contractor must do the following with regard to pollution control (Section 4-11) : "The Contractor shall so prosecute the work as not to discharge into the atmosphere from any source whatsoever; smoke, dust, or other air contaminants or �r produce noise in such quantity as will violate the provisions of the rules and regulations of the local or regional jurisdiction." L "Throughout the life of the contract, the Contractor shall take adequate measures for the abatement of pollution or detrimental effects resulting from operations or occuring at the work site. The Contractor shall immediately comply with instructions from the Engineer for corrective action." Dust control will thus be mandated by the contract. If special problems or complaints arise, then extraordinary dust L control measures will be implemented (Tom Dawes, CSDOC Deputy V Chief Engineer, personal communication) . 27 V L ® Table 2 PROPOSED CHANGES IN FACILITY NEEDS TO TREAT FLOWS FROM PROPOSED DISTRICT NO. 14 Phased CSDOC Phased Dist. No. 14 .� 1983 Master Plan Planned Capacity Present Joint Works 5-year Yew 2002 5-year Year 2000 Cumulative Facility Increment Total Increment Total Total ` Nominal Rated Treatment Capacity e1 Plant No. 1 - 46 mgd 24 mgd 80 mgd 5 mgd 15 mgd 95 Plant No. 2 - 186 mgd 0 0 0 0 0 New Plant No. 1 Headworks 80 mgd 100 mgd 5 mgd 15 mgd 115 Bar Screens 3 5 1 1 6 increase increase Raw sewage pumps 3 4 size size 4 increase increase Grit removal basins 4 4 size size 4 increase increase Foul Air Control 1 1 size size 1 increase increase Prechlorination facilities 3 4 size size 4 Primary Sedimentation-Plant No. 1 Rectangular tanks 4 at 6 mgd 14 at 6 mgd 1 at 6 mgd 3 at 6 mgd 17 at 6 mgd Primary Solids Handling Sludge digestion tanks 1 2 0 1 3 Sludge thickeners 0 3 0 1 4 Improved Treatmentl Aeration basins 0 6 0 2 8 Secondary clarifiers 0 10 0 2 12 Interplant Effluent Pipeline 0 1 0 increase 1 size Belt Filter Press 0 3 0 1 4 Odor Control Facilities under design as needed as needed as needed as needed Sludge Trucks 1 4 0 1 5 -^ Other support facilities as identified as needed as needed as needed as needed in Master Plan Environmental Mitigation Facilities as identified as needed as needed as needed as needed in Master Plan Source: Michael Brandman Associates, 1985. ITable 6-1 of DEIR) 1 The facilities needs shown assume new air activated sludge (worst case) rather ,d than conversion to pure oxygen or chemical addition to primary clarifiers. 22 Table 3 ANTICIPATED CHANGE IN OPEEATIOilIS AT PLANT NO. 1 AND JOINT WOEES IRWD Total Present CSDOC Master District 14 with L Parameter Condition Plan (yr 2002-3) Year 2000 District 14 Flow treated, mgd 60 126 15 141 L Land use, acres 65 81 4 85 Screenings, yd 3/day 4 8 1 9 Grit, yd3/day 3 6 1 7 L Sludge generated, tpd 140 250 20 270 1 Truck trips/day 7 14 2 16 Automobile trips/day 180 378 45 393 Employees 78 164 20 184 Digester gas production ft /day 664,000 1,304,000 1459000 1,449,000 Energy generation L kwh/day 29,200 57,380 6,380 63,760 Potable Water Use, gpd 45,000 94,500 11,250 105,750 Air Pollutant Emissions2 (lb/day) Carbon Monoxide 660 1,386 165 1551 Oxides of Nitrogen 264 554 66 626 Oxides of Sulfur 66 139 16 155 Particulates 12 25 3 28 Nonmethane hydrocarbons 30 63 8 71 L Purchased Energy Use Electricity, kwh/day 35,700 37,485 4,462 41,947 L Natural gas, therms/day 18,400 2,190 20,590 Chemical Use3 f Chlorine, tpy 2,870 744 88 832 L Sodium hydroxide, tpy 20 54 6.5 60.5 Polymers, tpy 104 218 26 244 L Hydrogen peroxide, gpy 15,600 32,760 3,900 36,660 L 1 Primarily Plant No. 1 except for outfall pumping energy use which is included in total above and ocean discharge impacts. .� 2 Assumes Master Plan improvements (i.e., central generation) are implemented. 3 Units of tons per year (tpy) or gallons per year (gpy). Source : Michael Brandman Associates, 1985 . L 23 L Table 3 (continued) IRWD Present CSDOC blaster District 14 Parameter Condition Plan (yr 2002-3) Year 2000 Total Ferrous chloride, tpy 13.8 29.0 3.5 32.5 Ferric chloride, tpy 1,900 4,952 590 5,542 Potassium permanganate, gpy 1,300 2,735 325 3,060 Activated carbon, tpy 1.3 5.5 0.65 6.15 24 L Response to Comment #22 At present, no specific plans for landscaping have been L developed. However, the Districts staff and Executive Committee j of the Board of Directors have indicated that such a plan (to be �J developed by a landscape architect hired by the Districts) will L be prepared for each plant site. Drafts of such plans will be . reviewed with surrounding ,jurisdictions and interested parties to solicit input prior to finalization (Tom Dawes , personal L communication) . Of priority for landscaping are the southerly perimeter of L Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach and areas of both plants adjoining the Santa Ana River. The latter areas will be L landscaped as appropriate once final design and/or construction of new facilities is completed, while the former landscaping V project is proposed for implementation within the next year (Bill V Clark, CSDOC Superintendent of Maintenance, personal communication) . L Response to Comment #13 I A new relocated signalized entry gate will be constructed to W serve Plant No. 1 to provide for employee safety and reduce the L frequency of accidents as well as facilitate direct access from the San Diego Freeway. Such an entrance has been evaluated, j deemed feasible and preliminary plan have been developed towards u implementing its .approval and construction. A letter requesting L, comments on preliminary plans and a new interior road layout have been sent to CalTrans and the City of Fountain Valley (Tom Dawes, L' personal communication) . The time frame for implementation is L "as soon as possible" depending upon securing necessary permit 25 L approvals, preparation of plans and speci f icat ions,bidding, contract award, and construction. This will probably take 12-18 months. It is planned that the new entrance will be completed prior to the start of construction of the new headworks at Plant No. 1 (Tom Dawes, personal communication) . In the event this access is not constructed (for some unknown reason) , the Districts will seek approval to improve the Garfield Avenue (rear) entrance to the Plant as needed to .. accomodate the heavier trucks bringing materials to the job site during future planned construction. -A traffic management plan addressing construction-related traffic routings and scheduled construction activities will be developed and reviewed with local juridictions (Tom Dawes , personal communication). Response to Comment #14 r Compliance with all applicable noise ordinances will be .a required by District contractors (See response to comment #11). Hours of construction will be restricted as necessary to assure compliance with ordinance provisions. The need for pile driving operations will be evaluated during design, and if required, a ti specific noise control plan will be prepared and reviewed with local jurisdictions. The Districts will inform local homeowners of any anticipated impacts via a published announcement . Specific noise control measures that will be incorporated Into project design include but are not limited to the following: - Noise barriers and attenuation features around noisy equipment. - Specification of low noise equipment (pumps, motors , engines, etc) when required to meet local ordinance provisions or to protect workers against potential hearing loss due to extended exposure. .. 26 V Response to Comment #15 L During construction the following specific actions (as a minimum) will be taken to mitigate odor impacts as needed: ! Wi A schedule of construction activities which require operational changes will be maintained an aupdated as needs (on a daily basis) and kept in the Control Center at each plant. y This will be used by Shift Supervisors in directing operations staff. Extra staff will be assigned as needed to accelerate or intensify work activities which can help reduce odors. One prime example is the draining of a primary clarifier which can result in raw sludge being exposed to the atmosphere as the tank drains. Assigning extra personnel for washdown as the tank drains can greatly reduce odor generating potential (Bob Ooten, CSDOC Operations Engineer , personal communication) . Such operations will be necessary for the rehabilitation of existing primary clarifiers prior to their being fitted with `d odor control covers. Other measures include increasing the dosage of chlorine or V ferric chloride to influent wastewaters during clarifier servicing or. prior to cleaning digesters. r Resunse to Comment #16 A predesign geotechnical report addressing all geologic, �+ seismic and soils issues will be prepared by a qualified L ' engineering geologist to provide input to the design on new major facilities at each of the treatment plants (Tom Dawes, personal communication) . Response to Comment #17 Emissions of air pollutants from existing operations have not been quantified by the Districts or its consultants except for the hydrogen sulfide emissions noted. This is largely a L result of the lack of emissions data from the various equipment and the fact that major changes are underway at present to reduce L existing emissions to comply with applicable regulations. The major efforts now underway to reduce sulfide levels in the L L 27 L digester gas used as fuel will have a dramatic effect on reducing oxides of sulfur emissions. The District presently operates some 21 major engines which must achieve compliance with a new SCAQMD rule (1110.1) for control of oxides of nitrogen under a phase ,r program. The schedule of compliance is shown in Table 4. Air pollution control has become increasingly more difficult and expensive to achieve as the regulations become more restrictive as attempts to meet ambient air quality standards in the noncompliance areas of the South Coast Air Basin continue. Indicative of this is the fact that the Districts concurrently have more than forty permits either filed, under review, oar .. issued by the SCAQMD. Many of the Master Plan facilities and improvements proposed [those using engines or centralized energy .. generating facilities (cogeneration) have as a primary focus air pollution control (either for gases or odorous compounds). Many of these facilities are conceptual in nature and this EIR e addresses their need, estimated costs, location, and alternatives to a particular faciltity. Specific details for each facility were provided based on the best available information. However, this information is subject to change as further design studies are undertaken. Other factors which will affect final facility design include the effectiveness of various air pollution control r devices the District is now testing or putting into operation. The results of this on-going program will be continaully evaluated and discussed with the SCAQMD to enable the Districts to come into compliance on schedule and to obtain necessary permits to construct and operate the facilities proposed. 28 r L Table 4 Li RULE 1110.1 W PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE GAS FUELED ENGINES ONLY L Plant No. 1 LL Date for Location Brake Horsepower Compliance ** Headworks MSP #4 300 12/31/87 PEPS #1 230 12/31/87 PEPS #2 230 12/31/87 Headworks MSP #1 300 12/31/94 y - - Plant No. 2 Date for L Location Brake Horsepower Compliance ** Foster O.B. # 9 INN 12/31/86 Foster O.B. #10 1200 12/31/86 60 Rothrock O.B. # 1 600 12/31/86 C Headworks MSP # 5 350 12/31/87 C Headworks MSP # 6 350 12/31/87 L B Headworks MSP f9_ 250 12 31/87 _F Plant Hp0 Station # 3 325 12/31/87 Digester Gas Compressor # 1 200 12/31/87 L Digester Gas Compressor # 2 200 12/31/87 PEPS # 1 300 12/31/87 PEPS # 3 300 12/31/87 L B Headworks #10 250 12/31/94 C Headworks # 7 350 12/31/94 C Headworks # 8 350 12/31/94 *C Headworks MSP # 3 375 Installation Date *C Headworks MSP # 1 375 Installation Date L * Two engines to be added under P2-25-2 - BACT employed at date of installation. ** Includes 12 month delay in compliance granted under (d) (6) (8) L NOTE: A plan for implementation of the requirements for this rule must be submitted by April 26, 1986. 1 W L L 29 r Response to Comment #18 r The Table referred to was inadvertently missing from the DEIR originals that went to the printer. A copy of Table III-20 is shown as Table 5 . r Response to Comment #19 Page IV-33 listed eleven air pollution mitigation measures which were recommended for the Districts to implement or evaluate. Of these ,eight are being implemented by the Districts r at present. Those which are not include solar-assisted hot water r heating, use of digester gas in District vehicles, a complete Inventory of vehicle emissions. At present, there are no plans r to implement these lattter three measures. As far as scheduling and implementation, only definitive schedules for a few of the r measures are currently available. These include implementing the Digester Gas Utilization Study which was finalized in March of r 1985, implementing either the Komax or Hiperion gas scrubbing ,y systems for sulfur removal from digsester gas, implementing the findings of the Plant No. 2 energy conservation and lighting study, and recent (June 1985) award of a design contract for the odor control projects recomended by Malcolm Pirnie earlier this r year. Most of the air pollution control projects are being Implemented independently of any of the other Master Plan facilities to provide for hydraulic reliability and operational r efficiency since they are in the environmental mitigation measures category for existing impacts. Response to Comment *20 Mitigation measures for visual impacts are going to be made r an integral part of the design and construction of the various r 30 r L L Table 5 L ( Table II-20 of DEIR ) U ' ESTIMATED AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS FROM EXISTING OPERATIONS Air Contaminant (lb/day) CO HC NOx sox Par! . Reclamation Plant No. l L IC Engines and other Stationary Sources 166 52 965 49 11 L Mobile Sources 574 41 48 6 3 Indirect (from electrical 'L power useage) 7 5 74 6 5 Subtotals 747 98 1087 61 19 L Plant #2 L IC Engines and other Stationary Sources 285 189 3284 71 19 Mobile Sources 574 41 48 6 3 L Indirect (related to Electrical Power useage) 18 11 175 117 15 Subtotals 877 241 3507 194 37 U CSDOC TOTAL-Plants #1 & #2 1624 339 4594 255 56 Source Receptor L, Area 18 ( 1984) 449 , 240 90 , 240 90 , 460 --- --- CSDOC % of Total for 0 . 30 0 . 40 5. 3 --- --- Source Area 18 U L L L 31 L [ l I I t L C I I t [ I [ I [ l l l [ Table 5 (cont) Assumption Used in Deriving Emissions Estimates for Stationary Sources ._ -- muxtan, µalsslnnq Ib/d., Proaro{ An,r nµe Nn. of 11iW 1".any, 11I (2) U) (4) IS) 1na.0 bm f:nRlnan Lp gain L0 5112 � NmIC Part trula,.e Y4xI M,. 1 Ile.lwak. 2 405 U1 12 1 21 2 PIPS 2 Iµ0 oil 14 1 10 1 III—erx 2 1,5MI 395 its 11 20(67 7 wJlera 4 P1 ua(7) 16 2 7 1 1 SIINTIRAl. 965 146 49 52 11 1'l not No. 2 l0 11r:uleo'k. µ 6 C 6 I,1811 1,1117 1119 24 73 7 1r P1:1'S 2 2115 2711 21 5 15 1 Mrs 2 Su, $12 41 9 29 1 (:a. Cumpraa.or 2 235 22) 19 4 12 1 ONP5 (Nulbrnck 6 Fnnlar) 1 1,114, 944 µµ U 59 5 wd 41a and Flares(7) 2x _1 12 1 2 SNATOTA1. 1,284 295 71 169 19 VITAL Mail PIWrTS 4.249 451 121) 241 10 (1) In X./IIP—µr I, Ran corn.,-. Iq N.25 µ./Ilp-Ilr 5 Rx/Op-Ilr Inn Aural-lw-0 rq;burs - Md.a.al (7) wna..1 00 14.,1xa1 rl/d.y am 265.40, et/:lay of 7.5 µdllp-Ilr in, dual 1ur1 enithvn - wgx•rlm di,—,er P.ax IrJ to Aolk,a and y1.1.a rat Ylant No. I (2) 1.5 Rm/111'-Ilr in, all rNtlrwa m 4 IN.. 2 reaprative)y at tiro lulleelnµ rminclon (1) Na..4 an 250 PM His In di,.ler Naae dm coral lurrvt 0.15Z au1/ur In JI.erl feel Ion .hu 1- c ran 107 I6/106 cl real ..'Inn. cn' 11 Ib/1116 cl (4) Men me it.. 1,4,.c.rbuna, 1 µco/IIP-Ilr "n> 250 ppa, 11 S la JIR..tar P..ra (5) 0.119 µco/lip-11T for all engine. Nall[ 1, 14/J06 ct Pnn I .lr 6.1 Ib/106 d Source: John Carollo Enginccrs, 1985. L L L Air Pollutant Emission Factors Used in Deriving Emissions Estimates Digester Gas Fueled Internal Combustion Engines (Existing) L Note: There are no published emission factors for digester gas contained in EPA emission factors publications. Those used were derived from natural gas emission factors with modifications where District site-specific data is available . See attached Table of Assumption excerpted from the recently completed Digfester Gas Utilization Study by John Carollo Engineers. Emission Factors Electrical Energy Use Equivalent (Power Plant Emissions) CO NOx Sox Part. ROG 6+ lb/1000 kwh . 21 2 . 1 1 . 4 . 18 . 13 Transportation Emissions District vehicle use mix Percent use Mileage I Light duty passenger vehicle use 20 800/day 6� Light duty trucks 30 1200/day Heavy duty gasoline 10 400/day i Heavy duty diesel 40 1600/day 6. Based on 1985 Composite Emission factors obtained from the California Air Resources Board, 1980 . L Emission Factors by vehicle type used in deriving emissions estimates IL emission factors in gm/mile Parameter LD Passenger LD Truck HD Diesel HD gas HC 1 .5 2 .0 3 . 2 8 . 7 CO 15 20 22 135 L. NOx 2.0 2. 1 i5 7 . 3 Part . .27 . 29 2. 0 1 .0 sox . 10 . 10 2 . 7 0. 6 50% coldstart/hot start mix La LD=light duty HD=heavy duty Conversion of THC to RHC (0. 785) (THC)= (RHC) L Assume 260 working days per year for all activities such as sludge hauling. L L 33 I 6. projects. See the responses to Comments #27 and #28 for a more r detailed discussion. Response to Comment *21 r The nature of the facilities proposed and the relatively minor change in operations which will result should not affect the adequacy of existing fire-fighting facilities of the City of Fountain Valley. There will be adequate personnel with proper training available to handle all anticipated treatment plant needs. Ongoing cooperative training in the handling of chemicals will occur with local fire department personnel. Response to Comment #22 A ten percent increase in district-related traffic should not create any capacity problems at intersections in the vicinity. r The construction of a new entry gate at the offramp to the San Diego Freeway at Ellis Avenue should greatly alleviate the r potential hazards posed by having to make a left-hand turn into Treatment Plant #1 from Ellis Avenue. Response to Comment #23 Comment so noted. The City of Fountain Valley will be briefed on the details and be given every opportunity to provide r full input on the Ulitimate Solids Study environmental documents when they are completed in the future. Response to Comment *24 r Traffic noise impacts will be addressed in the Traffic Management Plan which the Districts will prepare and review with the City of Fountain Valley in the future when construction- related scheduling and traffic needs are better known. r 34 it L Response to Comment C25 L1 There will be no increased hazard associated with treatment plant improvements due to changes in the use of L chemicals. In fact, the risks are likely to be greatly reduced in the future when the use of chlorine is expected to be reduced 6, from about 11,000 tons per year to about 1,500 tons per year if YI ' the odor covers and scrubbers are as effective as anticipated. Chlorine is now used in large quantities as a means of reducing _ hydrogen sulfide emissions responsible for odors. Once covers and scrubbers are installed, then the use of chlorine can be cut L back dramatically. None of the chemicals that will be used in I L increased quantities in the futre are expected to result in any increased risk to the community if a leak or spill were to occur. L, The greatest concern with handling or use of chemcials involves worker safety in the treatment plants. On-going training and the L use of proper equipment will minimize the risks of injury to plant operators. V L L+ V L V I V 35 V �. CITY OF t SUN i ING i ON BEACH P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING DIVISION(714)5365241 PLANNING DIVISION(714)S364271 May 9, 1985 J. Wayne Sylvester General Manager County Sanitation District of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 r Dear Mr. Sylvester : = The Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report has. been reviewed by staff in both the Planning and Public Works Departments. The City has some concerns regarding the short term impacts of noise and odors and long term impact of the 84 foot extension of the surge tower that will be constructed at Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. We would like to know who will be the individual on your staff functioning as a liaison between the community and City Hall when #26 complaints are made regarding noise and odors during the construction phase of the proposed improvements. As noted in the DEIR, the 84 foot surge tower will have a #27 measurable, visual , impact . As with urban oil drilling and extraction sites, architectural considerations can be incorporated into housing the tower . The City of Huntington Beach would like to see more than texturing of paint as a method of improving the towers appearance. Also, proper landscaping can reduce the impacts of the tower . For example, no landscaping exists along the fence adjacent to the Santa r #28 Ana River, an area visible from the bicycle path as well as the cities of Newport Beach and Costa Mesa. Please direct any further correspondence or comments regarding this matter to myself or Diana Blaisure, Assistant Planner at 714-536-5271. Sinaefely, Glen Godfrey Deputy Planning Director Development Services .. GG:DB:kla ( 2429d) 36 r 6. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH The City raised concerns regarding short-term impact of L. noise and odors and long- term visual impacts from the proposed surge tower extension. L Response to Comment #26 W The individual on the CSDOC staff who will be assigned to function as a liason for receiving complaints and initiating any L necessary corrective action (in support of the Engineer) will be a Senior Administrative Assistant assigned to the General Manager's office. This person will be knowledgeable in all L aspects of the District's operations. The telephone number to call is (714) 962-2411. L Response to Comment #27 In considering various design alternatives for a a 15 foot extension of the surge tower (from 70 feet to 85 Peet) , the L Districts will utilize the services of an experienced architect familiar with methods of reducing visual impact from tall structures as part of the design team (Tom Dawes, personal communication) . L Response to Comment #28 u An architect will be included as a member of the design team for the final design of the outfall booster station, outfall surge tower extension and other facilities to be designed and constructed which will have the potential for visual impacts. y Overall treatment plant appearance and visual impacts will be improved through the use of structural design features, V landscaping, fencing and other appropriate means. Special L consideration of the appearance of the treatment plants when 37 6' V viewed from the Santa Ana River Levee trail will be included in a landscaping plan once construction is completed. ,r All of the final designs of structures which will affect ,r visual appearance will be reviewed with the staffs of neighboring cities to seek their comments prior to the preparation of Plans r, and Specifications. The Districts recognize the importance of being "good neighbors" and will continue to work closely with the V cities surrounding their facilities to assure that impacts of their operations are minimized (Wayne Sylvester, CSDDC General Manager, personal communlcatinn) . r V V r 38 V RtY. I (! a �aeetn,Wq County of Orange ©�ULILJ April B, 1981 NTY OF eMt v ..Rosa uxii+nwrw [o: F. N. Oboe, Naeapr IX[/4Vlrenunul MslYsls Dlvt.lm aAN+rW o RANGE PANTA AMA. Teea.tt YBm, Jerrr t. Smnrtt, Wngr M/hansprta[fen Planning Division u .=.. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY NWT.u, Gp[YYm 90BJBCr, Saint treatment Watewater Marks W.Gr Plan NANNMO 9Lbxem4 YIeLMY nu MCL 4033 Fl have ".lewd [he Draft Can SIR for the Joint Treatment o Pr jectawaar a Iff April 34. 1985 Plm P"pe"d LY [he Cancer Sanitarian Dbtrlant no 1. yen .OnN1 l Of Iranlfty lmprmv.go. of[enn Ro a.. fen Plant ift.om 1 In reuntaln Valli., To trmenc r flo W. 9 is NYn o. I t Plant, o. wa d an ocean nrplant l effluent CMr.onn , indication caws de posm6r tem. We h Plant No. 1 tog comments, ent } and m eeun cattail effluent Ceun.y aenfletlmo O3N[r1e" of O.C. disposal rYt"m. W have {M1e following cmmetMu P. 0. to+ h> CIRCULATION W Islas Kill. he.. Fountain Valley, CA 9370B no rid should r emplaa thin the ...Main Muscle, import of ..ean.mm, SUBJECT. Draft SIR. Jet., weTW Nsmr Pltn mill "tube regional Improvement. 1. the fr..way .y.tan .ad tbe Nu[u #29 Plan Of Judicial Highways. Mcili"Ird {r..In In the "glen will Door W. Go...: "fists She cemploLLen of .,cartel highway. end Seat. An. River St11p n int. each as G.rf Irld-Sf.l.r and {.Eric, - Itch Sou[ which .re The Rawl.on.NoL.I he.......E Agency bed review" the Draft SIR for [M Immediately adjacent or through unit.tlon district property. Jules Me[.[ Plm of Yutwa[ei Treatment .nd'Di.pm.el Facilities. no project consists of facility Smprwewnt. affecting Ruloutlm Plant No. 1 AIR DUALITY 1. Feact.ln Valley, Treatment Plant No. 3 In Runtlogton Reach, and Various lnterplane facilities ten transfer flow. frm Plant He. 1 to Plan[ No. 3 #30 ° Table II-l. the California Air Quality Standard for Sulfur D1o+1de was .nd an ....E oulf.11 affluent disposal ryeamm. "dyad from .JO plow to .}) pan in November 1983. Reacted are specific comments for your consideration true pIA/Tnnepoi[etfro #31 A rougM1 aulmte should by prarldnd far [ha onpovuetlon "bead ..boost PlmnlnB Dlvlalan And [NA/Publle Work. beside. emissions at both Plants. Thank am for the op,vtunity to respond to the MIR. We continue to look ° no in...r. egad for determining the rot.slon. 1n Table IV-2 should he forward to working with you on this project. W mould appreciate receiving #32 Prnvload time{ with their a Table IV-} .bo r.f.n to Table 111-20. two tact.. of he FEIR when they be. available. Tab able 1. net found In a, copy of [he MIR. It you have eon eau[fens, plea" cen[¢c Jet[ Use at g34-5330. SIRCNAY9 Very [inky rear., rIR should ar.0 M1ew roeatruc[lon of tMu foellftfu ear affect the #33 s,nt. M. uw.r rr.0 and eon.. bin.wr. wlenb tins tm.e"alm .rasa wwna.l N. Rum.. clef aAtea OII./rAD, Public Prmlacu Cmmtdlnulen :^v,.. J,?Gmlr S.A.[. Rennet{, Wnbpr A[uchm.nu Transportation Planning Dlvltlm BPIwR1K.::te(3I001) r U- c- U- I[- e- c- r r- r [ r_ �- RESPONSE TO COtR4HNTS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE Response to Comment #29 The comment that regional improvements in transportation needs will be necessary to accomodate growth in the CSDOC service area is noted. The Districts are aware of the need to make 10 construct the bridge crossings of the Santa Ana River and have been working with the County of Orange and other agencies on the W specific plans for these projects utilizing a right-of-way which r is on or affects Districts pipelines and/or the Plant No. 2 treatment plant site. No impact on the proposed Master Plan improvements is anticipated from these actions. Response to Comment #30 W Comment on the change in the sulfur dioxide standard is noted and the level shown in Table II-3 should be changed from v 0.50 ppm to 0.25 ppm. Response to Comment #31 Estimating construction-related emissions is an extremely 'd difficult task at present due to the uncertainties regarding the final design and scheduling of the various facilities proposed. However, it can be expected (based on past experience at the Districts and the dollar amount of work proposed) that 60-80 y construction-related vehicles will be traveling to and from the plants each day and some heavy duty and light duty vehicles will be in use on-site as needed to perform various functions. Work on the various projects proposed is expected to be underway for several years. During the most intensive periods of construction (is excavation or placement of concrete) heavy duty equipment useage will be greatest on the order of 15-30 trips per day. 40 W v On the average, this will represent an estimated fifty percent increase in existing transportation-related activity from the Districts present operations. Emission estimates from present � i operations are shown in Table 5 (TABLE II-20 OF THE DEIR WHICH WAS INADVERTANTLY OMITTED) which assumes that emissions are r equally divided between each treatment plant. Thus assuming the same vehicle mix and mileage for the construction related emis- sions Cie locally (Orange County) derived supplies like concrete and labor ] construction can be expected to produce the following exhaust emissions: y Contaminant lb/dav emitted Carbon monoxide 574 Hydrocarbons (nonmethane) 41.2 v Oxides of nitrogen 48.0 Oxides of sulfur 6. 1 Particulates 3 .0 u Other indirect emissions will be generated somewhere as a result of manufacturing and production of the resources and energy needed to complete the proposed projects. These indirect emissions are too difficult to quantify at present , but may be 6' substantial given the magnitude of equipment and materials needed. Response to Comment #32 Air pollutant emissions estimates are based on the preliminary work done by the Districts consulting engineers (John r Carollo Engineers) as reported in the Draft Digester Gas Utilization Study completed in February of 1985 and addressed in Appendix G of the DEIR. Other air pollutant emissions estimates L provided as part of the impact assessment were developed from estimates made by K. P. Lindstrom & Associates. The factors used v 41 V in determining the emissions in Table 6 (Table IV-2 of the DEIR) are delineated on Table 6. Also, Table 5 (missing Table II-20 referred to in the DEIR) is presented with the assumptions used u in deriving estimated emissions on pages 31-33. Also,the reader w should refer to response to comment #31 given previously for construction-related emission estimates and responses to comments .e #37-#47 for a description of what activities will be carried out to assure compliance with applicable air quality regulations and a final analysis of air quality impacts from the proposed projects. w Response to Comment #33 There will be potential dust,noise, and visual impacts on the Santa Ana River Trail and other bikeways during construction of the outfall booster station site at Plant #2. Work will take place on weekdays when the trail is under less intensive use. It r is not anticipated that weekend construction will occur when the greatest use occurs. No direct impacts will obstruct or prevent w use of the trail or impact it in any other way. Visual impacts during construction will be highly visible . Upon completion,until landscaping is completed, the view from the trail will be that of a typical wastewater treatment facility. No project related activity or emissions are expected to result in adverse impacts on trail use. .. Response to Comment #34 The expansion of the interplant pipeline system is not r included in the present Master Plan or EIR. This will be the subject of a future engineering report and EIR which will provide 42 Table 6 ( Table IV-2 of DEIR) V WITH TED RID POLLUTTREATMENT EMISSFACILITY ASSOCIATED NITtl PROPOSED TREATMENT FACILITY INPROVEHENTS Air Contaminant Ilb/day) es' CO SCI NON sox Part. Estimated Emissions from Centralized Cogeneration Facility 2 655 109 2182 176 39 Transportation- related emission changes associate with improvements 115 8 10 1 1 Subtotal 770 117 2192 177 40 ins Emission reduction possible through phase-out of existing IC engines at bojh r treatment plants -451 -241 -4249 -120 -30 Overall Net Change 319 -124 -2057 57 10 kJ 1. Nonmethane hydrocarbons. 2. Recommended 0250 horsepower dual fuel (digester gas and diesel) which will generate 40 million kilowatts annually. This would allow for installation for electric motors in all new facilities and phase-out Ar of existing internal combustion engines throughout both treatment plants. No decision to construct such a facility estimated to cost $20 million has been made. If it is built, Costa of ONPS and Neadworks No. 2 would be revised. 3. See Table II-20u£ DEIR (Table 5 of this Final EIR) 4. Ten percent increase of existing emissions assumed (see Table III-20 for existing totals). ea+ ALTERNATIVE B v ESTIMATED EMISSIONS FUN A COGENERATION FACILITY Emission Levels 0eantlty (U Pollutant PIHVHou[ lb/day Has S.O 21A2 v CO 1.5 655 S02 Note 2 176 rr NHNC 0.25 109 Particulates 0.09 39 1 Based ac 8250 operating no[sapowe[, dual fuel engines. (2) d:aced on 250 ppm N2S In digeace[ gas and OJ3 cement gulf ur In iesel fcel. L 43 L for the cooperative efforts and needs of both the County and the Districts if the timing and coordination in planning can be carried out to meet mutual objectives. d, Response to Comment #35 The Districts are well aware of the need to secure a' alternative means and/or approved sites for disposal of grit, screenings and sludge. CSDOC has entered a long-term agreement m with a private firm (EKO of Orange County, Inc) to take all of m the dewatered digested sludge produced at the two treatment plants beginning in July of 1986. The sludge will be used by EKO in the a composting and soil amendment production facility at a site located in San Bernardino County which has been leased by EKO which is in the final stages of securing necessary permits to operate a processing facility at the site. Meanwhile, plans for finding alternative means of sludge disposal as a back-up and to assure long-term reliability under all potential circumstances are proceeding. Presently, CSDOC +� contracts with the BKK Corporation and Falcon Disposal Services for disposal of residual solids which cannot be disposed of at m County Landfills. Grit , screenings and some sludge is now trucked to the BKK site in West Covina for disposal while the r rest of the sludge (up to an average of about 25 trucks per day) is taken by the Districts to Coyote Canyon for burial with municipal refuse in the landfill. As far as use of Bee Canyon Landfill for sludge disposal , the present Memorandum of Understanding between the County of Orange and the City of Irvine precludes the acceptance of sewage sludge until a decision to m accept them is made based on a complete environmental review and 44 y L/ preparation of documentation needed to fulfill the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act including a public hearing. ,r The Master Plan flow projections set forth in the DEIR (24 mgd within the next 5 years) are estimated to result in an '� additional 32 tons per day of sludge or an average of two truckloads per day of sludge. Disposal of up to 25 trucks per day can be accomodated at Coyote Canyon until its closure. Any r additional sludge which is generated which is beyond the assimilative capacity of Coyote Canyon (set forth in its Waste �r Discharge Permit Requirements) will have to be handled through other approved means. At present, there is nothing to indicate that sludge quality will be changed as a result of planned treatment plant L•I improvements or the increases in flow which will occur. If any r, changes occur, it is likely that they will reflect the inmprovements being made in the reduction in the toxic materials present in the influent wastewaters as a result of an on-going L source control program being implemented by CSDOC for both industrial and nonindustrial sources. V 1,I VI L V 45 L+ Ns. Rilaty J. Baker April 30. 1985 rA, Page 2 X^ um, Q L +°O— Thank you for this opportunity to comment on this DEIR and please Xwvv msry feel free to call if any questions Arica. Xon 1 wavesm Very'truly Yours, rmme,w,er ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT rr. .We W.,.. Patty 'A. Les Associate Engineer April 30, 1985 PAL+dao Ms Hilary J. Baker Senor Engineering Aide County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. BOX 8127 p Fountain Valley, CA 92726-912I 0 Dear Na. Bake[+ Draft Environmental Impact Report Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan, State Clearinghouse No. 04051616 This is in response to year letter dated March 15, 1905 on the Above mentioned subject. This District is con cerned About Any #36 facility which may affect the quality of the secondary treated wastewater at Plant We. 1. As mentioned in the GRIN, the District currently operates Water Factory 21, an dvanced wastewater treatment plant which takes up to 15 MGG of Plant No. 1 secondary treated wastewater. In addition, the District is currently designing the Green Acres project which will reclaim secondary treated water from Plant No. 1 and use this highly treated reclaimed water for irrigation of landscape areas within five alley of Water Factory 21. The initial design capacity is 3.5 MGD with an ultimate capacity of 7.5 MGD: this I. in addition to the m..imum 15 MGO capacity of Water Factory 21. I In light of our current and future secondary effluent needs, any improvements in treatment method. and/or reliability is of general benefit to the District. It is our understanding that the SARI sever flows are t0 be diverted t0T[ea[sent Plant No. 2, and thereby improve the quality of water available to OCWD for reclamation (see OCWD letter to CSDOC dated February 27, 1985). The District endorses this effort. While the DEIR does not specifically address the water quality of Plant No. 1's secondary effluent, any future means of ensuring adequate water quality and quantity as Plant No. I realizes its ultimate capacity would be n th best interest of protecting our precious groundwater s upp I. �OYO ELL6 MwN.EPD COr0V re.M/.m WYEK 41ftlW16rIDaXn iEIEPXJNE11w1WCwzuwwXb RESPONSE TO COMMENTS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Response to Comment #36 y No changes in the quality of the secondary effluent provided I to the Orange County Water District is anticipated as a result of carrying out the proposed Master Plan improvements (Blake r ' Anderson, CSDOC Director of Operations„ personal communication) . I . y r v r L V L YV V L 47 L [ [ [ [ [ [ [ ! E ! ! [ [ ! ! [ [ [ [ Souttl Coast Ms. Hiles J. Baker -2- April 25. 1985 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 91 SO FLAIR DRflE ELMONTE.CAS1731 1018)673 6= April 25, 1985 #42 o mmaaxdlmumg of ground l in. evelconcentration. Rod receptor areas, to include hazardous organics if they are significant. Ms. Hilary J. Baker o Map to Show, ianplath of the actual average County Sanitation Districts #4 3 concentration based on an emission race of of Orange County one gram per Second. P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 0 Maps to show leoplaths of the maximum Deer Me. Baker: #44 ground level concentrations for each of the modeled receptor areas based on an EIR on Joint Treatment Works Naecaweter exieslen rate of one gram per second. Mascot Plan. SCH No. 84051616 0 A map shoving the surrounding area within a five miles and identifying sensitive qO Thank you for the opportunity to review this enviroremencal #4 5 receptors such as schools, hospitals, document. The District's Engineering Division has made the convalescent boxes, and agricultural areas. fallowing commence. The following areas need to be addressed in a final SIR for the protect: o Odor control mitigations during tie-ins of o Detailed description of digester gas-fired #46 cleeni constructed.faand pt cilities, digester #37resource recovery facilities including prime mover and heat recovery. #4 o Asmesa risk involved with hazardous material. o uncontrolled and controlled emissions for (each ea chlorine) if a major spill occurs. .ch piece of equipment in each plant including #38 a If you have y 6y418.iom on these comments, please contacti sting and proposed equipment and the basis me at (818) 572-6418. for emission calcul scions: - Oxides of Nitrogen Very truly yours, - Oxides of Sulfur ' - Carbon Monoxide - Reactive and Unteacaive Hydrocarbons �F.` - Particular.. Brian Ferris - Hydrogen Sulfide Planning Divisionpecialloc • Detailed description of Beat Available Control BF:sh #39 Technologic. to be implemented including reduc- rien effi.i..Ci.._ o Explanation of how theproposed equipment will #40 includiniMW gtRules 40 h the p1icable Rules of the 402. 403, 404, 408. 430. 431.1, 1110.1, and Regulation %III. o Power plant emissions associated with the lse- #4 1 trical power usage of the plants after modification. u v RESPONSE TO COMMENTS BY THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Response to Comment #37 v At present, a "detailed" description of the digester gas- fired resource recovery facilites does not exist. Alternative prime movers (engines) to be potentially used in such a facility `. were described in Tables D-4 and D-7 of the DEIR. No details on heat recovery facilities have been developed to the level of L detail desired by the SCAQMD. However, it is expected that they will be similar to or better than (more efficient) than existing ;r facilities employed by CSDOC. A schematic of the facilities proposed during preliminary design is shown in Figure 1. Ongoing discussions with the SCAQMD will continue during preliminary design, final design, and application for authority construct permits to assure that applicable air quality regulations are `s met. A proposed implementation schedule for the digester gas �+ utilization study project elements is shown in Figure 2. Copies of the final Digester Gas Utilization Study were provided to the y SCAQMD for review. V Response to Comment #38 Estimates of uncontrolled and controlled emissions for "each piece of equipment in each plant including existing and proposed equipment and the basis for emission calculations" is based on limited on-site emission testing and professional judgement along u with the performance testing of equipment in use elsewhere which is proposed for use by the Districts. YI The District's consulting engineers (John Carollo Engineers) who prepared both the Master Plan and Digester Gas Utilization y 49 v e Figure 1 FROM OTHER TO OTHER Op EXHAUST HEAT ENGINES ENGINES Q RECOVERY SILENCER TO EXISTING HOT WATER LOOP >•�.> HEAT AUTOMATIC EXHAUST JACXET WATER BYPASS VALVE FROM EXISTING HOT HEAT EXCHANGER WATER LOOP }WAY r VALVE AUXILIARY HEAT ENGINE m EXCHANGER RECLAIMED JACXET WATER WATER PUMP ENGINE- ENGINE LOOP GENERATOR CIRCULATING LURE OIL HEAT PUMP MEAT EXCHANGER EXCHANGER CIRCULATING PUMP r COGENERATION ALTERNATIVE HEAT RECOVERY SCHEMATIC r' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY DIGESTER GAS UTILIZATION STUDY m Source: John Carollo Engineers, 1985 50 L L Study have estimated existing and proposed emissions for various pollutants along with their assumptions. These are summarized in L Figure 3. Detailed emissions data for each piece of existing equipment is being developed in cooperation with the SCAQMD as J" CSDOC updates its permits to operate and/or files for new Ir permits to construct. Response to Comment M39 Detailed descriptions of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) are at present beyond the scope of planning done to date. it However, several technologies are being tested by the Districts or being applied to existing equipment to comply with applicable y regulations. Included are the following along with their r estimated reduction efficiencies: Sulfur Reduction For digester gas sulfur removal the Districts have evaluated both the Komax Process (80% efficiency is estimated) which makes use of high efficiency static chemical mixers placed strategically in the compressed gas piping., This process has not been used on digester gas, but due to the high compression achieved, it is expected of being successful. The Hiperion Process is a new process used in Japan which is claimed to be 99% efficient in cleaning sulfur laden gases. The Districts have undertaken pilot testing of this system and the final results are presently under evaluation. Ferrous chloride addition to digesters to reduce sulfide �. levels is estimated to be about 8.0% effective. A major program to evaluate such a system is presently underway. It appears to be the most cost-effective means of sulfide reduction to bring the digester gas into compliance with Rule 431.1. It may be effective alone, or if lower limits are necessary, in combination with one of the above processes. u Oxides of Nitrogen Reduction After evaluation of several technolgies, the Districts have concluded that selective dilution utilizing a prestratification of combustion chamber gases in engines and "clean-burn " engines having a modified precombustion chamber can be used to meet SCAQMD Rule 1110. 1 which require NOx reductions to L 51 v ( [ [ [ H [ I H H l [ [ [ ( [ E E [ 1 1 MANUFACTURE OF PREPURCHASE EQUIPMENT REVIEW OF PREPURCHASE SUBMITTALS %T BIDDING AND AWARD OF PREPURCHASE CONTRACT GENERATE PREPARATION OF ELECTRICITY PREPURCHASE SPECIFICATIONS N SLUDGE GAS UTILIZATION STUDY F" M` :°lK DISTRICT <<Il;,�fi;7 REVIEW •.. PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDDING AND AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT FROM SCAOMD 1886 lose 1987 loss 1089 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Source: JCE,1985 DIGESTER GAS UTILIZATION STUDY Figure 2 I W less than 2 gms per hr-hour. This technology can be applied to existing engines by changing the cylinder heads, intake and exhaust manifolds, adding a turbocharger, intercooler, u and new pistons and other components. New engines containing these features can also be purchased. Application of this technology to digester gas fueled engines has not to date been demonstrated although a new installation is presently being tested in Denver,Colorado. Response to Comment #40 L. Explaining how the proposed equipment will comply with applicable rules of the SCAQMD is beyond the scope of the present EIR since final details on air pollution control equipment were r not available as part of this programatic environmental evaluation. It is CSDOC's intention to comply with all applicable v rules and regulations of the SCAQMD at the time of application for permits to construct or operate for individual project elements for which permits are required. Also, the requested W modeling will be done as required for each unit process or operations for which a permit is necessary once BACT or specific W information of sufficient detail to use in deriving modeling assumptions is obtained. Details on the specific engines and �. control technologies have not yet been developed to the stage where specific types of equipment have been selected. Details of the various regulations and how compliance is to be achieve is W contained in the March 1985 Final Digester Gas Utilization Study which has been provided to the SCAQMD. In the near future, it is W expected that the Districts and SCAQMD will evaluate the need for New Source Review determinations for the Districts operations. u More specific quantification of emissions from the proposed projects and the impact of those emissions on ambient air quality W levels was requested. Due to the preliminary nature of some of 53 v y the project elements (is gas or electric motors) and centralized versus individual power supply for each of the treatment plants, the quantification of emissions was not possible. r However, the Districts staff and their consulting engineers have been meeting on a regular basis with the staff of the South Coast d Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to discuss the District's current operations, planned changes, and new projects. V During these meetings,compliance with existing and proposed regulations have been discussed along with the permitting requirements for all operations which require permits. This is a 'tl very complex matter for an operation of the magnitude of the Districts, and it will continue to require a considerable amount V of staff time and expenditures for air pollution abatement from both existing and future operations on the order of millions of dollars. Based on the preliminary nature of the facilities d+ proposed,and the fact that it is subject to specific changes during design and consultation with the air quality managment Districts personnel in order to secure permits , detailed evaluations of air quality impacts were not performed since the assumptions on emission rates which would be used were too uncertain. However,such air quality impact modeling and other specific studies will be necessary in order to obtain needed r' permits once project design is completed. The Districts will perform such modeling when the nature of the specific project r elements is determined. Also , such work will be done as necessary to satisfy AQMD requirements as related to obtaining permits for any new equipment or changes in operations. 54 r L L Response to Comment #41 Power plant emissions associated with the reduced electrical power useage (purchased from SCE) assuming a centralized generating system at each treatment plant is constructed have L been estimated and the emissions are shown in Table 7. Table 7 Estimated Emissions from Power Generation to Serve CSDOC Needs 60 With. Centralized Digester Gas Energy Generating Facilities - (Assumes 74 million kilowat hours a year of useage) Pollutant Emissions (lb/day)• CO 43 V NOx 426 Sox 284 Particulates 36 Reactive Organic Gases 26 Taken from page 11 of Appendix G of the MasterPlan DEIR. i " Assumes power plant emission factors cited in .South Coast Air y Quality Management District's 1983 "Air Quality Handbook for Environmental Impact Reports (Revised December, 1983) . Response to Comments #42-45 u The modeling of projected emissions Is premature due to the uncertainties regarding the types of prime movers, their size , L effective stack heights, type of air pollution control L equipment etc. As stated previously, the Districts are working closely with u the SCAQMD to achieve compliance with applicable regulations for both existing and future facilities. All necessary modeling will L be done on an individual basis for each major operation or L process subject to permit requirements as the permits are filed. V 55 L Response to Comment #46 See response to Comment #15 Response to Comment #47 �+ Risks associated with use of potentially hazardous materials such as chlorine, caustic soda, and other chemicals or have been r minimal at the Districts facilities based on past experience. This is based on past performance histories in which incidents of r leaks or spills have been virtually nonexistent. Use of bulk chlorine storage facilities in recent years has reduced the frequency or need to change chlorine containers, thus decreasing the potential risk of release from operational activities. However, should some unforeseen accident occur , the bulk containers would be capable or releasing greater quantities of chlorine. However, built-in safety devices and constant training of District and local fire department emergency response personnel in both routine and emergency procedures related to chlorine and other chemicals used in treatment operations will y continue to assure that risks are minimized. Covering of the primary clarifiers at both treatment plants r combined with the scrubbing of off gases will dramatically reduce chlorine demands offsetting the increased demands associated with treating more wastewater and sludge in the future. The net r effect will be no net change or an overall reduction in chlorine useage. Other chemicals such as caustic sodea, muriatic acid, and use of gasoline and other fuels which are transportred and stored on site will increase in the future. The risks associated with the use of the these chemicals and materials is not expected to be 56 r any greater than at present if the necessary safety procedures fl W ; already in place or practiced are followed. I�JII Wi I Ii 4J i II ! Lai i W IWI W IWI IWI WI I4JI . III IWI W 57 r r REFERENCES r California Air Resources Board, 1980. "Procedure and Basis for Estimating On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions. " January. r John Carollo Engineers, 1985. Digester Gas Utilization Study- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Joint Treatment Works. March. Malcolm Pirnie, 1984a. "Special Study Report - Odor Situation Assessment and Recommended Plan - Plant No. 1" . November. `s Malcolm Pirnie, 1984b. "Special Study Report - Odor Situation Assessment and Recommended Plan - Plant No. 2. " November. m Michael Brandman Associates, 1985. Draft Environmental Impact Report-Proposed Reorganization No. 79-Formation of County Sanitation District N0.14 and Reorganization of County Sanitation r Districts No. 7 and 13- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. May. .. South Coast Air Quality Management District, 1983. "Air Quality Handbook for Environmental Impact Reports" . Revised Edition. r r r r m r r 58 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Av r•` ' dl a� J O U LG co� BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1985 - 1986 FISCAL YEAR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA PO.BOX B127 June 28, 1985 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CAUFCANA 9212E-8121 108"ELLI9 AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CAUFOBNIA 9210E-7019 TO: Boards of Directors (7141540.2910O1m9622m: SUBJECT: Transmittal of Individual Districts' Budget Recommendations for 1985-86 Fiscal Year . The proposed 1985-86 budgets for each of the eight Districts are enclosed for your review and consideration. The budget package was reviewed by the Executive Committee on June 26, 1985. The Executive Committee recommends adoption of the proposed budgets by the respective Hoards at the July 10 joint meeting. SUMMARY The proposed 1985-86 budgets total $250.2 mi111onF up 13.0% over the 1984-85 budget total of $221.5 million. The following table compares the proposed 1985-86 budgets with the 1984-85 budgets to highlight the major areas of changes in the upcoming year: 014 BOD38f 3I4-TIRY OUIILIM Q' DMAIS) ROES 1985-86 RKUIREMENyg 1985-86* 1984-85* S CE, BLUCLIT jam T F E krDM KR IS O & M $ 26.8 $ 23.6 $ 3.2 10.7% O3LTf MCN SWIEM & OTHER DISIRICT 0 & M 3.6 3.3 .3 1.5 TREF,ZIIM piANT OaSDRUCTION APEEMSUMOS 31.1 33.6 (2.5) 12.4 DISBRICf SPER OI4HIILX=U4 APPRDPRnMC S 66.0 52.8 13.2 26.4 ITT S;WICE 1.8 1.9 (•1) •1 Sg.21=L $129.3 $115.2 $ 14.1 51.7% 014S1R7.'1TCN R9301W $ 85.0 $ 60.7 $ 4.3 34.0 anm mmm 35.9 25.6 10.3 14.3 cSLB-TO L $120.9 $106.3 $ 14.6 - 48.3% T=;L FOW $250.2 $221.5 $ 28.7 100.0% EUROM am-OVER $ Z7.2 $ 18.6 $ 8.6 10.9% APPROETIIAZED ICES 154.4 149.2 5.2 61.7 SUB-7OIAL $181.6 $161.S $ 13.8 72.6% TAX Aid.00A CN (1% RPM) $ 21.7 $ 18.2 $ 3.5 8.7 MX IM FOR Bam REIVIfIO4 .1 .2 (.L) 02EIRIMCN GRIM 6.3 6.3 - 2.5 Effi 3B.6 10.8 7.8 7.4 INS & pffm 21.9 18.2 3.7 8.8 SB-41t7D1L $ 60.6 $ 53.7 $ 14.9 21.4% 117IIT, EUNU G $250.2 $221.5 $ 28.7 100.0% * ADIUSIED P R WIER-0IETRICr T1RNNISA TICKS The source and application of the 1985-86 budgetary dollar is depicted in the following charts: AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE .729 DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION .26 02 4 <. CONSTRUCTION T Q6K k 4 (0 DISTRIC . +, a RESERVES .34 ST SERVICE.O �'F� �-1; 0-� SHARE OF JT OPS w\ �y OTHER TREATMENT RESERVE PLANT 14 EXPANSION .12 SOURCE OF BUDGETED REVENUE DOLLAR TOTAL $250.2 MILLION BUDGETED REQUIREMENT DOLLAR TOTAL $250.2 MILLION The Districts' share of the 18 ad valorem property tax levy, allocated in accordance with Proposition 13, is appropriated to the operating funds of the respective Districts to pay operation and maintenance costs pursuant to the Revenue Program (approved by the Joint Boards in April, 1979) adopted to comply with regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State Water Resources Control Hoard (SWRCB). We have assumed for budgetary purposes that average annual tax allocations will increase 8% per year. -2- All Districts except District 11 appear to have adequate tax revenues (combined with supplemental user fees and industrial user fees in Districts 1, 5, 6 and 13, and industrial user fees in all Districts) over the next five years to finance operations and maintenance costs as summarized on the table below: SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FINANCING* 1985/86-1989/90 (Millions of Dollars) 1985-86 1989-90 Start w/ Receive Have Total End w/ Dist. Reserves Revenues Available Reserves or No. of of Transfer Funds of Expend Transfer (Deficit) of 1 $ 3.0 $ 24.2** $ 27.2 $23.1 $4.1 2 10.2 60.1 70.3 60.0 10.3 3 7.2 60.2 67.4 64.2 3.2 5 1.8 13.7** 15.5 12.5 3.2 6 2.2 10.8** 13.0 10.3 2.7 7 2.4 19.1 21.5 15.0 6.5 11 2.5 12.5 15.0 17.3 (2.3) 13 0.1 1.0** 1.1 0.9 0.2 29.4 $201.6 $231.0 $203.3 $ $27.7 _ *Not adjusted for inter-district transactions. See individual District's cash flow statements for detail. **Includes user fees when tax revenues become insufficient to fund the residential community's share of operating and maintaining the Districts' facilities in the future, alternative funding sources will have to be adopted to supplement the taxes. The viable alternative methods are: (1) Nearing and separate levy of user charge on the property tax bill (2) Separate user charge collected on water purveyor's utility bill (3) Direct billing by Districts of a separate user charge (4) Election to authorize separate ad valorem tax levy. District No. 5 implemented a user fee effective with the 1981-82 fiscal year to fund increasing operating costs and major sewer rehabilitation work. District 6 adopted a user fee beginning in 1983-84. Districts 1 and 13 are implementing user fees effective July 1, 1986, Districts 2, 3 and 7 will be able to fund operations from ad valorem taxes and industrial user fees for the next five years. Under the Revenue Program, industrial/large commercial usersare presently charged on the basis of actual use and receive credit for ad valorem taxes paid pursuant to the uniform industrial waste ordinance adopted in 1970 and amended in 1975 and 1983. Institutional/tax-exempt users are also billed separately by the Districts based on actual use. -3- The timing of any user charge implementation will depend upon the fiscal year in which the ad valorem tax allocation and available reserves become inadequate to cover 0 & M costs (line 14 of the cash flow projections) . The major portion of the Districts' funding requirements for the next five years is for construction of new facilities to handle rising sewage flows and provide improved treatment. SUMMARY OF PROJECTED EXPENDITURES 1985/86-1989/90 Treatment Plant Construction $194,830,000 39.2% Trunk Sewer Construction 88,014,000 17.7 $282,844,000 56.9% Treatment Plant and Sewer M & 0 $203,386,000 40.9% Debt (Including RA's) 10,614,000 2.2 Total Expenditures $496,844,000 100.0% Capital financing for sewers and treatment and disposal facilities will be provided by accumulated construction reserves and interest, grants, fees and sale of capacity rights. SUMMARY OF CAPITAL FINANCING* 1985/86-1969/90 (Millions of Dollars) 1985-86 1989-90 Start w/ Receive Have Total End w/ Dist. Reserves Revenues Available Reserves or 1990/91 No. of of Funds of Expend (Deficit) of Committments Balance 1 $ 5.0 $ 5.0 $ 10.0 $ 29.3 (19.3) 2 55.2 28.8 84.0 92.6 (8.6) 3 45.9 27.3 73.2 82.6 (9.4) 5 7.6 15.2 22.8 24.2 (1.4) 6 3.0 10.4 13.4 12.9 0.5 7 16.8 29.1 45.9 26.1 19.8 11 7.7 33.9 41.6 26.3 15.3 13 5.7 9.1 14.8 2.9 11.9 Total $146.9 $158.8 $305.7 1216.9 $8.8 62.1** Sf53.3) *Mot adjusted for inter-district transactions. See individual .Districts' cash flow statements for detail. **Includes District 2 share of Water Reclamation Plant in cooperation w/OCWD. Although EPA and SWRCB have previously funded up to 873st of the cost of construction of advanced treatment facilities, the most recent grant received by the Districts is funding only 30% of our latest grant project. Anticipated expenditures and grant funding are reflected on CORP Schedule B-3. This schedule itemizes all: projects into grant funded and non-grant funded categories. If these funds are not forthcoming, any projected deficits will be even greater. -4- The real long-term impact of federal and state requirements on District fiscal planning will be on operating costs. While, as noted, EPA and SWRCB currently fund a portion of constructing facilities for a higher degree of treatment, the added ongoing operating costs must be paid entirely by the local community. The Districts have 135 MGD (60 MGD now in service at Plant No. 1 and 75 MGD now in service at Plant No. 2) of secondary treatment on line. The approved Joint Operating budget increased by 13.4 percent for 1985-86. Should future EPA/SWRCB requirements force the Districts to construct and operate full secondary facilities, our operating costs would dramatically increase. We expect operating costs to stabilize except for inflationary influences and rising flows. The five-year cash flow projections for all Districts reflect these stabilized operating costs on line 8. Staff, as part of the revenue program requirements, has reviewed connection fee schedules to determine the feasibility of this revenue source for financing the escalating cost of providing sewerage facilities to meet long-term facilities requirements. User fees are also a potential source of funding capital needs in other Districts. The five-year estimates include anticipated receipt of $13.4 million from SAWPA for sale of an additional 7 MGD capacity and payments on its existing 8 MGD. No provision has been made for proposed District No. 14 (except to fund formation costs from a $490,000 deposit from the Irvine Ranch Water District presented in a District 14 ACO fund budget included at the end of District No. 7's budget package) . In the final analysis, the fiscal posture of each District depicted in the enclosed projections will depend on economic trends and development activity within the service areas of each member agency. FUND DESCRIPTIONS The budgets have been itemized separately for the operating, capital. and debt retirement elements of each District's budgetary structure to assist Directors in analyzing the projections. Operating Funds Projected cost increases are, for the most part, directly attributable to federal and state secondary treatment requirements and other regulatory impositions such as the new AQMD requirements regulating use of digester gas to fuel our internal combustion engines. These new regulations require major increases in chemical usage to lower hydrogen sulfide levels in our digester gas. Inflationary trends are also reflected. The increasing costs, with the limitations now placed on tax revenues by Proposition 13 and on expenditures by Proposition 4, require implementation of user charges in District 1 in 1985-86. A review of the operating fund cash flow estimates (top section of the cash flow) allows the Directors of each Board to determine when their respective District may have to consider alternative user charge funding. Reference to line 14 on the five-year cash flow will indicate when a given District will be required to consider alternative revenue sources. When the fund balance indicates a deficit (in parentheses) and there are no unappropriated reserves available for transfer from capital-accounts, the District will- be required to implement user fees. -5- 6/21/BS Mlxl't' 8LN[TATIOX DISTRICT Ep.- ALL 9TA OP 80 Cl3X 9 eiBN VEAB 1 &S-96 TIRWaI 1909- 90 Lter OF9CN PRGI 1905-e6 19e6.67 1917-8e bBB-B9 1989-90 f_Yeat Total OeE MTIMa PUXO I Reserves [ Carry-Over Pra us, iut 21,461,000 E1-617,000 3E.SE1.000 33,911.000 32,137,000 21,451,000 Rersxu6 3 Were of It Tax Allocation 22,S59,000 31.261.00 26,205,000 28,302,000 30.S71,000 131,104,000 3 Pees 4,896,000 9,170,000 L016LI1000 12.369.000 11.113,000 53.459,000 t Internal a xlapllWWUS IWORA 3,067,000 3,2Sa,000 3,316,000 31291.000 31122,000 16,082,000 5 ONe[ Revenue $7,000 ]).000 51,000 21.000 0 U1,000 1 TVGL RNeNU1 32.S79.000 31,769,000 40.243,000 13.991,000 40,101,090 201 69L.0a0 ] SIRM APLluau NNOINa 62,040,000 60.306.000 73.370,000 ]).935,000 00.317.000 231.tS3,000 IABNaITURL9 9 Were of Joint NOIX. N 1 0 21.))5,000 30,791,000 35,410,000 40.730,000 46,906.000 INS,501,000 9 Colleatlan 5'... x 6 a aM other Oq[. 3,640,000 41068,000 6.416,000 5.078,000 5.676.000 22,865,000 l0 other 8ryandir.... 0 0 0 0 0 0 I1 9(MAL R.L.11Mm 30,t23.000 36.BS91000 39,826,000 45,790,000 $2,480,000 203,381,000 11 Reurvs. 6 Carry-(Ire[ to what YNt 31,617.000 33.527,000 33,944,000 32,137,000 27,766,000 3).)66,000 Net Year's D[y Period PUMIy Rpulueent. 15,21S,aa0 17.01,000 191,15,000 22,900,000 24,242,000 21,242,000 It Pwd samosa 0[ (D.firiu) 16,402,000 Lt.096,000 14,029,000 9 23],0a0 1,524,000 LSH A00 Wt. Moral l5 Mae[... 6 Citry-Over ". "at Yu[ 146,943,000 1291,21,00, 96.601,000 66.920.a0a 34,134,000 141,943,000 RAVINU8 16 Cwttua.lm Great. 6,310,000 2961000 40,000 2BO.000 2,827,000 9,753,400 17 I.e. Cenneett. 4,217,000 4,503,000 S,181,000 S,SIS,000 $1512,000 24,241,000 18 OtW[ 4,559,000 41389,000 t,021.000 S,317,000 S,)I1.000 24,000,000 l9 Sale at Chastity Rights 4,194,000 l2,7ee,000 899.000 9.615,a00 246,000 27,712,000 20 Internal 1 NI...11... IrcOme 13,697,000 111[1]1000 8,MARD 42S3,000 41112,000 11.629,000 it Can art.lions in his of Caret[ucran 2,250,000 300,000 a 0 0 2,SSa,aoa 22 PLa—Wead Equity Adluatnent 10,344,000 0 0 0 0 10,311,000 23 a.I I... 9xs.0aO 75,000 5.825,000 2.630.000 41500,000 13,97s,000 II TOTAL RBVevhr 46,496,004 33,760,000 25,422,000 19,640,000 23,109.000 138,134,000 35 TOW. Aglue. I m0X0 193.439,000 163.569.a00 122,103,000 96,560,000 59,542,000 )05.617,000 9WBNOtTMtl 26 Sneu at Joint Notes Tres resent Plant 31,088,000 39.1120000 36,90010an I7,400,000 40,300,000 114.330,000 37 OSat[Itt Collection $yetis 25,138,000 26,12B.000 16.613,000 10.130,000 9.66S.000 01,011.000 35 NI....eunt A9rasasnt PatNnte 026,000 64.300 1111000 L.033,000 973,000 2,904,000 21 Plw,-WPN 9 .1" Adluawnl 5,811,000 LS00.000 11500,000 I'S00,000 a 10,111.000 30 OW[ Sx'Wsituna 732,000 77.000 S9.00a 23,000 0 811.000 3l TOGL 9RP8NOITUR® 63,610,000 61,908,000 SS.181.000 60,426.000 50.018.000 291,973,000 12 Next,.. 6 CarryOWt t0 ...a Yea[ 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Xert yews 0[y P.,tW IUM ln9 Nqul[wnta 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Pwd BalaMe at (D6fiClq 1H.621.a00 9 161 --00 66.92a.000 ]6.L]L OOa 9A01.000 B_y2 dal Oa0 am NNa15) IS Reserves a cacry-Owt P[m Last TNt 51155,090 4,272,000 1,657,000 2.917,000 11832,000 S.LSSAao RP2`M 36 Tar 4vy 1581000 69S,000 667.000 362,000 153,000 21035,000 37 Internet 1 xlanllgewa 1.. 170,000 39S.000 320,000 237,000 112,000 1,592,000 19 ONe[ I.O. 303.000 0 0 0 0 303,000 39 StHAG PBPLVOR 931,000 110,01000 995,000 599,000 315,000 319,01000 10 NTAL AvRluau PmmiNa 6.006.000 5,362,000 4,662,000 31516,000 2.117.000 91085,000 11 Sek, P.Inclpl a I...rn.t 1,611,000 11705,000 11735,000 11604,000 ])2,000 7,710,000 12 0that eawnditunt 0 a 0 0 0 0 13 TJEAL MENDITINES 1,014,00 1005.000 1171S.000 1.681.000 772,000 71710.000 It Re..tve. a C...ywa[ m xset Yu. 4,272,000 3,657,000 2,91].000 1,832,000 L11751000 113751000 Is Next Ywt's Dty larlad PundIM ReWirWanu 6322.000 2,657,000 21911,000 1,832,000 11))5,000 l.l]S.000 46 Shard ..I.. 0[ IOefltlq 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUHARY IAd3uSNd for Inter-Pond Transfer&) 17 Reserve. 1 CanYO P[w Le.t YNr 181,559,000 165,710,000 133.665,000 101,781,000 70.103,000 101.559.000 t8 T%LW R8v9XU8 N.919,000 71.S$0.000 16,601,000 ]L20].000 71,832,000 366109.000 19 TJaRL AVAIWu ( in 261.130,000 337,260,040 200,466,000 133,100,000 141,135.000 S4S.660,000 SO M1OGL 8y mIM 95,768,000 103.395.Oa0 961665,000 107,195,000 104,090,000 $07,023,000 S1 Aeas.... . car[¢Ovet W Ns.t Ysa[ 165.7La.000 133,86S,000 103,781,000 70,103,000 37.9IS.OaO 37,045,000 52 Nett that's Ory Par boll Pundin, Regul[emnts 19.106.000 21,066,000 22,032,000 21.732,000 27.60,000 21,111,000 $3 Mon WAECR M C..CIT) L16.EN.000 II2.])].000 04,949,000 49,371,000 10,228,000 10,228,000 -6- Districts 2, 3 and 7 are presently in a very sound financial position. Last year, the District 2 and 7 Boards of Directors recommended that a portion of the reserves in the Accumulated Capital Outlay (ACO) fund be transferred to the District 2 and 7 bond funds, which with anticipated annual interest earnings will provide sufficient monies to pay both the remaining bond redemption and interest expense for the life of those respective Districts' 1951, 1958, 1962 and 1970 general obligation bonds. It is further recom- mended that a portion of District 3's ACO fund reserves be used in 1984-85 to pay the bond redemption and interest for District 3's 1951 and 1958 general obligation bonds as has been done for the past two years. Capital Funds The capital funds include the accumulated capital outlay (ACO) fund and the facilities revolving fund of each District . These funds finance each District's share of Joint Works plant expansion costs, as well as the individual District's trunk sewer and pump station requirements. Treatment plant projects are listed on CORF Schedule B-1, and collection system projects are listed on separate schedules under each District's budget recommendations. Bond Funds Outstanding bond debt and interest obligations can be met by an annual tax levy which is allowable under Proposition 13. Financially sound Districts may elect to forego a bond fund tax levy and pay annual bond retirement and interest from existing reserves. This determination has previously been made each year during budget deliberations. As indicated above, Districts 2 and 7 carried out a transfer of capital and operating reserves at present value that will pay the 1951, 1958, 1962 and 1970 general obligation bonds for the remainder of the life of the bonds. District 3 also transferred a portion of its ACO fund reserves to its bond funds to pay for its 1984-85 bond retirement and interest. Continuation of this practice in these Districts in 1985-86 and in future years will save the taxpayers $51946,000 in additional taxes over the life of the outstanding bonds issued by the three Districts. IMPACT OF GANN (PROPOSITION 4) SPENDING LIMITATION INITIATIVE Proposition 4, the statewide initiative which was passed by the voters in 1979, limits appropriations of state and local governments from tax sources to a formula based on changes in population and the cost of living (Consumer Price Index) . If growth in per capita income is less than the increase in the CPI, then the formula is adjusted to reflect the lower of the two. Staff has estimated the Districts' appropriation limits which will be presented as a separate Agenda item and submitted to the Boards at the July 11, 1984 meeting of the Joint Boards. Our calculations indicate that each District is within its authorized limit as indicated in the table on the following page: -7- INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS' 1984-85 TAX APPROPRIATION BUDGET COMPARISON WITH GANN LIMITATIONS 1985-86 District Net 1985-86 District Tax Appropriations Budget Gann Limitation 1 $262,000 $1,740,309 2 2,708,253 7,236,699 3 4,092,775 9,113,843 5 1,237,570 1,874,003 6 930,148 1,090,863 7 1,035,384 2,177,190 11 967,863 1,915,521 13 No tax appropriation budget Not applicable (District is 100% financed by fees) SPECIFIC BUDGET ITEMS Following is a brief discussion of the major elements of the budgets: CARRY-OVER AND RESERVES: The appropriated reserves and carry-over consist primarily of accumulated construction reserves for financing improved treatment facilities mandated by federal law and the master planned trunk sewer systems of the individual Districts. Also included are operating fund contingency reserves and authorized general reserves for the tax revenue cash flow dry period. REVENUE Taxes: Tax revenue is split to two accounts: Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation of the Districts' pro rats share of the maximum 18 basic property tax allowed under Proposition 13. The Districts average approximately 38 ($.03 for each $1.00) of the basic levy. Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make voter-approved outstanding general obligationbond principal and interest payments. Under Jarvis-Gann, tax levies to satisfy these obligations are not restricted. As pointed out in the discussion on bond funds on the previous page, staff recommends that the 1985-86 levy be waived for District 3, and that debt service be financed by a transfer from other funds. Federal/State Construction Grants: EPA and SWRCB have historically funded up to 87h% of treatment plant construction for approved projects. Estimates reflect anticipated payments based on grant funding of those eligible projects -e- indicated on CORP Schedule B-1 at 80% (net). of project cost, except for the $5.5 million hydraulic reliability project at Plant No. 2 (P2-25-2) , for which we expect to receive only 30% grant financing. Fees: All Districts now have an adopted sewer connection fee schedule. This account also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by all- eight Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and the user. fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 5, 6 and 13. Annexation fee revenue is indeterminable and, thus, not included in the estimates unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of Pees. Sale of Capacity Rights: This account records income from sale of capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA and IRWD, including the capital replacement charge. SAWPA is considering purchase of an additional. 2 MGD in 1985-86 and 5 MGD in 1988-89 under their existing agreement, and these revenues are included in the 5-year estimates. Directors are aware that the Boards are considering a proposal. by IRWD to form a new sanitation district to serve the Irvine area which would require up to 32 MGD of capacity in the Districts' facilities. Inasmuch as this is still in the study phase, it is not reflected in the projections. Interest & Miscellaneous Income: Consists primarily of interest income from investment of accumulated construction reserves and other miscellaneous items. Other Revenue: On the cash flow statements this account generally reflects inter-fund transfers. EXPENDITURES: Other than reserve appropriations there are six major expenditure components of the individual Districts' budgets, four of which have either previously been acted upon or reviewed by the Boards, or established by contractual obligations or outstanding general obligation bond indentures. Joint Works Treatment Plant Construction Program: Adoption of the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF) by the Joint Boards at their regular June meeting established the requirements for this item, which accounts for 18 of the 1985-86 budget. Included in the ACO Fund budget are appropriations for the current year CORP budget and toward master-planned treatment plant expansion costs that will total $195 million over the next five years. Each District's share is based on its respective equity percentage, which is computed on a three-year average of flow and assessed valuation. This account includes any annual.purchase of additional. jotnt works equity that might be required due to a change in a District's proportional equity percentage. Districts Nos, 51 7 and 13 are required to purchase additional equity in 1985-86. Unless otherwise noted, any such purchases or sales have been adjusted out of the combined summaries and schedules. District Collection System Consolidated Master Plan Construction Programs: Requirements for this item are essentially established by the individual Districts'adopted Master Plans of trunk sewers, but may be changed from time to time at the option of the Boards. Sewer construction will total'over "$88,000,000 during the remainder of the 1980's. -9- In 1982 and 1983 the Districts prepared master plan updates for both the trunk sewer system and the Joint Works facilities. The collection system studies included consolidated master plan studies for all Districts. These reports reviewed the existing system, identified deficiencies in the collection facilities, and proposed specific projects to alleviate those deficiencies. In addition, they recommended a schedule for construction of specific projects and estimated project costs. Districts Nos, 2, 3 and 11 combined to prepare a master plan of trunk sewer facilities, which was approved by the Boards in December, 1982, Districts Nos. 11 7 and the north half of District 6 were combined in a second master plan study which was approved by the Boards at the same time. District No. 5 and the south half of District No. 6 were combined in a third study and approved by the Boards in June 1983, This "Super District" concept allowed the Districts' collection system studies to be based upon drainage areas rather than political or district boundaries. This approach was considered to be more logical and cost-effective than one based strictly upon jurisdictional: boundaries. Special projects identified in the master plan for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11 are now in progress or have been completed. The Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer and portions of the Lincoln Interceptor Sewer, and the Katella Interceptor Sewer and Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station Sewer are under construction or completed. The Taft, Crescent, Imperial and Lampson Interceptor Sewers are under design. Each individual District's collection system project schedule is annotated to identify the current status of its master-planned projects. The Districts' system analysis included full' utilization of existing trunk sewer capacities by the sale of capacity between districts rather than constructing additional capacities in some Districts. For instance, District No. 2 will- become a net purchaser of capacity in the Knott Interceptor by purchasing capacity from Districts Nos. 3 and 11. District No. 3 will purchase capacity in the Newland Interceptor and the Coast Trunk system from District No. 11. The master plan for Districts Nos. 1 and 7 and the north half of District No. 6 generally found two major areas where improvements are needed. The first area is the Irvine Business Center (IBC) area within District No. 7. The Directors have previously approved and accepted amendments to this master plan and the Von Kerman Trunk Sewer, Main Street Relief and Mainstreet Pump Station are now in construction. The study also found that extensive improvements are needed to the north half of the District No. 6 system. This trunk sewer system, originally installed by the D.S. Army Air Corps in the early 1940's and paralleled in 19528 needs a second parallel systemt however, District No. 6 does not have the financial capacity to proceed with design or construction of this system at this time. As an addendum to the master plan for Districts Nos. 1 and 7 and the north half of District No. 6, an analysis was made to determine what effect the creation of District No. 14, which generally includes the Irvine Ranch Water District, would have on existing and planned facilities. A new sewage transportation system which would benefit the new District as well as Districts 1, 6 and 7 was identified. Installation is anticipated about 1990. The south half of District No. 6 was studied in combination with District No. 5 since both areas drain through a common system in Pacific Coast Highway to the Districts' Huntington Beach plant. This system requires pumping to transport its -10- wastewater to the treatment plant. The existing parallel force mains within Coast Highway generally need rehabilitation. A schedule has been outlined to implement this rehabilitation, and it is anticipated that most of the work will.be accomplished by either the replacement or construction of an interior lining within the existing force main sewers. Completion of the rehabilitation of one of the two force mains is expected this fiscal'year. In summary, the staff has begun work to correct the most urgent deficiencies identified in the three combined master plan reports. Many projects are under design and several are now under construction as indicated on each District's collection system project schedule. Debt Retirement and Interest: These requirements are fixed by the indentures of the respective general obligation bond issues. (Also, see comments above under Tax Levy re 1985-86 funding.) Joint Operating Expenses: Requirements for this item were also established in June by adoption of the Joint Operating Budget. Individual Districts' shares of this cost are based on their proportionate gallonage flow. Reimbursement Agreement Payment: This account represents anticipated payments (based on connection fees collected) against outstanding reimbursement agreements where a developer has constructed a master plan sewer or advanced connection fees for such construction. Districts 5 and 11 presently have such agreements. District Maintenance, Operating 5 Other Expenditures: This item establishes requirements for maintenance and operation of the individual Districts' sewer collection systems and also provides for each District's general.business. It also includes any other miscellaneous costs or transfers not included in one of the above items. FONDS Following are comments regarding the several funds of each District's recommended budget. OPERATING FONDS: The major item in the Operating Fund is the share of the Joint Operating Budget which was adopted by the Boards in June. The remaining budget accounts are primarily for maintenance and/or repair of the Districts' collection system and for the incidental operating expenses which the Districts will incur. All of the Districts have been in the midst of major trunk sewer expansion programs for the past several years. As a result, budgetary requirements for sewer line and pump station maintenance may reflect increases for maintenance of these facilities as well as increasing energy costs. Industrial monitoring costs which reflect the expense of enforcing the use ordinance and EPA's pretreatment standards, which became effective on April" 27, 1984, are continuing to rise. Following are further comments on the Operating Fund line item accounts: Directors' Fees: Provides for regular meetings and allows for compensation in accordance with the fee schedule adopted by the respective Boards. Share of Joint Operating: Represents each District's share of operating, maintaining, and administering joint works treatment and disposal facilities and is allocated based on gallonage flow of each District. Amounts were established by adoption of the Joint Operating Budget in June. -11- Trunk Maintenance: Provides for maintenance of each District's collection system of trunk sewers. The several Districts presently have approximately 600 miles of sewers ranging in size from 8 inches to 96 inches. Manhole and Line Repairs: Provides for major contractual repairs to the Districts' manholes and trunk sewers or pump station wet wells which have deteriorated because of corrosion. Pump Station Maintenance: Provides for maintenance of Districts' pump and lift stations. Districts (particularly coastal Districts 5, 6 and 11i which have collection systems that cannot flow to the treatment sites by gravity have one or more stations. Therefore, the costs among the Districts vary considerably based upon the number of pumping facilities. Permit and Industrial Waste Administration: Provides for the Industrial Waste Division's administration of the Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance. Requirements mandated by State and Federal regulatory agencies have caused this item to increase substantially this year. Inter-District Sewer Use Charge: Provides for payment for inter-district flows between certain Districts pursuant to basic accommodation agreements of said Districts. Bond Collection Expense: Several:of the Districts' bond issues provide for coupon redemption by the Bank of America which charges the Districts for said services (with the exception of District No. 11) . Tax Collection Expense: The County charges a tax collection expense on all funds except bond interest and sinking funds. Treasurer's Investment Administration and Banking Fee: Fees charged the Districts by the Orange County Treasurer for placing specific investments of Districts' funds and handling commingled investments. Utilities: Major item in this account is for power supplied to the Districts' pump stations. Also includes telemetering on leased lines to the control center at Plant No. 11 and water supply where needed at the pumping station sites. Appropriations are increasing to reflect rising energy and water rates. Professional Services: Appropriates funds for minor engineering, Legal and special consulting work for which the need arises from time to time in the Districts. District 1 includes funds to develop a user fee program as a special expense item. Printing and Publication: This account provides necessary funds for publishing actions and regulations of the Boards as well as the Districts' annual report to the EPA and SWRCB. Travel and Meeting; Directors' Mileage: Provides for reimbursement to Directors for transportation to Board meetings and other functions. Uncollectable Accounts: For bad debts related to the collection of industrial user charges. Interest Expense: For interest on purchase of joint works equity or on outstanding reimbursement agreements, where applicable. -12- Prior Year's Expense: Represents adjustments to an account balance for the previous year(s) . Transfers: Usually reflects inter-fund transfers to complete previous accounting transactions or to provide necessary supplemental funding. Similar transactions may appear in other funds. Districts 2, 3 and 7 are in a sound financial position. It is therefore recommended that accumulated reserves in the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund be transferred to pay the 1985-86 bond redemption and interest. Districts 2 and 7 transferred sufficient capital funds last year to pay the remaining principal and interest due over the remaining life of all outstanding bonds in these two Districts. BOND FUNDS: Budget requirements for the Bond Funds are determined by the indenture of each issue and are established each year in accordance with legal' requirements. (See comments above under Tax Levy re 1985-86 funding.) ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS: Generally, the major item in the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund is the individual District's respective share of the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget for joint treatment works expansion, which was adopted by the Boards at the June meeting. In addition, the Districts also have a Master Plan Construction Program in progress for which specific budget appropriations have been recommended for contracts presently under way or planned in the near future. Other line items in this fund are primarily for accumulated reserves for future construction in accordance with the Districts' and joint works master plans and federal.and state requirements, and purchase and sale of equity in jointly-owned treatment works as provided for in the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, Districts 2 and 7 have accounts in their respective funds to finance the formation of District 13. Monies are budgeted for transfer out of ACO to the operating fund in District 1 because the anticipated operating tax revenues are inadequate. FACILITIES REVOLVING FUNDS: All Districts have Facilities Revolving Funds to account for connection fee revenues and capital expenditures for improvements paid out of said fund. Districts 5 and 7 have entered into reimbursement agreements for construction of Master Plan sewers and repayment of the advances are made from these fees. If Directors have any questions regarding the budget material, please contact Wayne Sylvester or Bill Butler at your convenience to discuss them with us. -13- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY s U LC O s BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1985- 1986 FISCAL YEAR CakILY SANPIATiCN DISTRICT NO. 1 6/10/85 BUXE ' RE3241MATICNS Revised 6/19/85 Revised 6/22/85 1985-86 FISCAL )MAR Revised 6/23/85 SLMIAW OFSCVIPTICFI OR ACOMW TALE BMGEI 9 BUDSRT 1983-84 1984-85 1985-66 R@2JIRII4DW Operating & Capital Requirements Operating Fund 3,722,000 5,179,000 5,939,000 Ammulated Capital Outlay Fund 8,840,207* 6,626,000* 6,848,000 Facilities Revolving Ford 105,000 SIB-TOIM OPEFATIM & CAPITAL 12,562,207 11,805,000 12,892,000 Debt Retirement Bond and Interest Fur3 - 1951 156,538 154,000 151,375 TOTAL F82AP 4M 12,718,745 11,959,000 13,043,375 RMING Operating & Capital Flydirg Cash & Investments (Appropriated Re vea and Carry-Over) 8,987,207 8,748,000 B4O43,000 Other Revere 2,425,000 1,917,000 3,475,000 Anticipated Tax Allocation 1,374,000 From 18 Levy 11150,000 1,140,000 SUB- C)= CFERATIM & CAPITAL 12,562,207 11,805,000 12,892,C00 Debt Retirement Cash & Investffmts (k:propriated Reserves & Carry-Over) 87,663 79,322 83,375 Other Revenue 91000 9,000 13,000 Al t Raised by Taxes Eor Debt Obligation 59,875 65,678 55,000 SUB-TOIPL DEBT REIIRE-ENT 156,538 154,000 151,375 TOM EUr = 12,718,745 11,959,000 13,043,375 *Adjusted for Inter-Fund Transfers The Canty is presently ' ing m taxi in connection with a displ w r assessed valuatim. Taxes inpmded as Of June 30th amxrtt to $5,246. ODOM1'r SUWTTATICM DISMCf NO. 1 Page 1 BUIX£P 103211 �Cr4S 6/10/85 Revised 6/23/85 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR FEW $1 CFERNTING AP1EOM APPROVED AMAL RE324vfrHIID D6QtIPrICI4 CR ACOMif TTII.E 9= YJDGU E%PMMUMS SUDXr 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 CFERTAG Director's Fees 4,000 6,000 4,939 61000 Cr ntracLmal Services Share of Joint Operating 2,067,000 2,771,000 2,220,376 3,119,000 Tru* eaint enance 30,000 30,000 4,975 25,000 Manhole hair 25,000 25,000 20,000 Permit & Ind. Waste Adn. 100,000 100,000 134,165 155,000 Ctrrectim Fee Adnin 5,000 W 31 300 Callllectiirn D ix 3,00000 3,� 2,134 3,OW Treasmser's Investment Pan. & Banking Fees 5,000 5,400 6,461 7,400 Professional Services 3,000 3,000 5,000 Special Expense 50,000 75,000 25,286 50,000 Printing and Pblicatim 1,000 1,000 863 11000 Travel & Mtg. - Directors 300 300 157 300 Omollectah] Aco nts 2,000 2,000 376 2,000 TOTAL Q£RAT11iG 2,290,500 3,042,000 2,399,763 3,399,000 NN-OF£RNTM Interest 90,000 Mpenses AEplicaMe to Prior Years 4,000 4,000 4,000 TOTAL N24-OPEPtff'1tiG 4,000 4,000 94,000 TOTAL LNG & NIT-OPEPAMC 2,294,500 3,046,000 2,399,763 3,493,000 RESEKRS Appropriation for Cmtimyrcie 280,500 610,000 699,000 Authorized General Reserve 1,147,000 1,523,000 1,747,000 TOTAL REEMES [1,427,500 2,133,000 2,446,000 TOTAL F7o21IIiQffiTLS 3,722,000 5,179,000 2,399,763 5,939,000 QIJFIIY SANITATIQ4 DISMCf NO. 1 6/10/82 1[DCET RB3241ITATIMS Revised 6/23/85 n85-86 FTSCAL YEAR FUM $1 CM ATIW. APPRYJM APPIOIM PMAL RB3244N= CE=PTICN B AL aX= T= BuDmr RE ET =DOEMITU4:5 BDXP 1983-84 1984-85 1984-855 1985-M AIRIUM RMING Cash& Investr is CayUecj R s cand c 864,800 1,394,000 1,506,366 2,994,000 Fees 471,000 332,000 379,123 424,000 SWplemtal User Fee, 816,000 Interest 6 Misc. 1aoeipts 64,000 65,000 168,628 Z71,000 e Delirg t Taxes 40,000 46,000 55,473 60,000 SUB-Iom 575,000 443,000 603,221 1,571,000 Tax AU tirn 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,148,569 1,240,000 Re3ave1hent Agxxy Pass-Ttxcugh 105,569 114,000 S3Hentims 50,000 40,000 18,U6 20,000 SUB-romL 1,150,000 1,140,000 1,272,254 1,374,000 Transfer from ALD Fl1d 1,132,000 2,202,000 2,031,000 TOML AVAnABIE F WIW. 3,722,000 5,179,000 5,412, 444 5,939,000 CIANIY S*FEJP CN DISTRICT N7. I 6/10/85 eUDXr FOOMIENUUMIS Revised 6/19/85 Fevised 6/2Z/85 1985-86 FISML YEAR Revised 6/23/85 FUV $1 ACaMMAM) CAPrmL ayiuY APPROM APPFINID ACTLAL R3321MIDID DFSCMPMON CR AOMW TITLE ixumr SMGE:P EXE&MDITLRM BUDGE f 1983-84 1984-85 1%4-85 1985-86 P1070S AND EAMMM ES Treatrent Plant E* nsim 3,600,000 3,046,000 1,271,283 3,622,000 Appropriation for Master Planned Tre-tAMt Plant Fs. 4,705,000 3,030,000 1,045,000 Flow Analysis & Metering 60,000 75,000 21,361 54,000 F1cwbased Equity Adjistmant 1,510,000 EarthgakwVlorl Damage A�Bpecsoeprve 117r000 FW. ties Inpr R is a d EgWSirn 475,000 475,000 500,000 sm— 8,840,207 6,626,000 1,292,644 6,848,000 Transfer to Opera" FLrd 1,132,200 2,202,000 2,031,000 TO1MIs FEWUgens 9,972,407 8,828,000 3,323,644 6,848,000 AVAILABLE FUV MG Cash & Im estnmts (Appropriated FW_;erVes and Oarry4ver) 8,122,407 7,354,000 7,354,393 5,049,OD0 Joint Works Fkluity sale 298,000 212,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 777,000 39,000 33,320 380,000 Fees 240,000 199,000 138,533 156,000 Federal and State Grants 426,000 572,DD0 254 735,000 Interest & Misc. Pweipts 6D9,OD0 664,000 847,749 316,000 SIB-7(7II+L 1,850, 11 474,000 1,019,856 1,799,E TOM AVAILAEM NDDIMG 9,972,407 8,828,000 8,374,249 6r848,000 ax,, Y Sn14TTATTQ4 DISTRICT CD. 1 6/10/85 BUDGET RooaqEDATTO.i 1985-86 M= YEAR FUND B1 FACII.ITTES REVMk-M DESCfIIPTIQ4 CR AC=W TPT[E BUDGET 1985-86 P%A1�IEE ISS AND E7DFI�PIIIId�S Facilities �latim f-gxovanantscand Elp�i.m 105,000 TOML FEWD a' M 105 000 AVAI ABBE ETIOING Caupctrm Foes 100,000 Interest and Mist Anaonre 5,000 TOM AUUTAIUR F Vr4G 105 000 OOLM S34417ATICN DISIRIC". 143. 1 6/10/85 M OC! T RS3341-,MATICrs 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR nM $1 a-XD & B71f�ST - 1951 Approm APP--Ck= ACnM 18132'ENDM DFSCRIMON OR AOMU r ElnZ BLDmr HIIX£P r;ITMITU ES 03XXT 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 B= RECIIswr xo IINmFbT Primilal"m Brds 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 Interest m Buds 11,288 9,625 6,708 7,875 TRIAL 81,288 79,625 76,708 77,875 AUUMZE1 G61EL IMMM 75,250 74,375 73,500 4omL RB2,R71L714 156,538 154,000 151,375 AUUTABIE FIBDING Cash S LI sb➢ is 01bPrcPriated Res?r S Carry-oe ) 87,663 79,322 80,165 83,375 Delingmnt Tam 2,000 5,000 4,010 4,000 Interest & M15C. Receipts 7,000 4,000 3,925 91000 Si73-TOTAL 9,000 9,000 7,935 13,000 AMJW 10 B8 PAIM) BY 7AY.e'5 59,875 65,678 72,265 55,000 117IIS, AVAMAM F@DIMG 156,538 154,000 160,365 151,375 Outstanding G.O. Bads @ 6/30/85: $350,000 Fiml Pays t Date: August, 1989 ylves snores �.� erores ¢tens�¢mua wsnace w. l . xo-unz a+esnnQ oaustsa semi P::.� Pw ac Mal C.I.P. 1905-86 199a-6) 1e9t9] 1908-e9 1P89-9p 19911-91 1991-9). FJa+w:m�Lq (al '>srem Il,OW S/,PW nis231aa a (a) Af0,000 ] IWO 100,OW ]O m LIO,WO ]OO,WO 100,W0 ]00.000 low. (a( F<t11y Anted lel mtla ,T. ew (el tLe flidel Vl0/es WOIT[ SW i.. OI STRIR X0. I Yvl aeO L/l9/.$ STA]L4Y1' or non,z£0 CA4X Pf.OX Xavlad 6/E]/61 p tSC.LL YPAK 1985-06 n.. 1101-1. LINS OtSIT oo 19e5-B6 IHFeI I9O-eB 19e9-A is@9-90 S-Sea[ Atai My.I O PWO t Yae[«a t Car rrbx[ hm Gat TdI 2.99JA00 3.116,000 1..21,00. 31112.000 1,616.000 3,994A60 A� l SYn e[ lJ 9aa Alimatim 1,134,000 1,519400 L172.000 Lp1.". 119511000 91414,000 ] rda 11240,000 2.600.000 3.9N.000 ],IU.000 41019.000 I1d66.000 1 L d[aae a MI-11-IM. I. nil.. 26],000 100.000 340.000 ]e5,000 1,559A00 s Otee[ X«a�tue 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 sOGL Ton. 71,0.000 1.I13100 6927,000 5.190000 6,315,000 24,2191000 TOT.AM1'.. .1. 5.919.000 1,15,1000 7,751,000 n,182,0oo 119.1.0. 21,2]].000 LIPL'®t]MS 8 SYY of Joint No[d X 6 O ].119,000 ],Se],000 4,126.000 1.111.000 3.154000 31,0]3.000 9 Glld tlm 9yst« X a 0 and ONer Opel. ]H.000 IO,OBO U].000 132,000 1I1.000 3.091.WO to 0[G[ Bapenellu[d 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 N W690tSNltS 1,1131.0 1,014,000 1.559.000 1,161,000 s.i]1.000 11,123,000 12 Yx[xs t Gt".I t0 qat Y«[ 2,.16,m0 3.021.000 3.112.000 1,616,000 4.no,no 41110."0 1] ..I M,.1 .11 '.1'" ""t"' kqul[eeend 1dOA00 E.01].000 2.Ee0.000 ySB] o` 2,936,000 2,13,100, II IM3 . tL.. .1 Cooflelq 699.000 BOI.WO 9tL 000 LO]].000 Ll)1.o00 I.Ilt -0 w1T, rNO Is) IS Yx[vJa I Ca[[y-On[ 1. I.M.Td[ 5.Y9A00 1.67L000 P,112,0001 (9,130,0001 IIs.135.m0L 1,049,000 9Ma0C 16 Moot[mllm M.... 735.000 1'. S.M. 31,000 313.00 1.23.4. l3 r«aa Cmnactlm t00.000 Io0,Bo0 1001000 too,000 1.0.0.. SM,Mo IB IS6.o00 1)5.000 196.000 E20,000 216.000 991.000 IS W. ofONe[bpatlty pi,to H0.000 68.000 .0.0.0 1,214,000 0 1.712.0.0 TO 9n««.I t Nixetlanema {rcva 335.000 0 0 0 0 ]25.000 2I MM: .nm« 211,400 0 0 0 0 212,000 32 AV.L L'oGlue L90e.0a0 371,0, 3,110, 1.567,00o 71J,000 1.9f2,00o_ 23 IOAL AMS wid ev10A0 6,lS7,000 2.040.00 u.nLoa O] I.Ali.000) (ll. 66.000] 10 00Lo00 WLm1TMM 31 $W[e IT Joint W[G Sdaeage pW0 3,622000 11 160,000 1.i9e,000 3.f 33.000 1.695.000 11.69 B.000 2s olaulet Gllecelm system 154000 10010. t➢..... 100,000 109.000 Sf1,00o SL MtaOu[xxn! Ag[eeaent laydnts 0 0 0 0 0 0 2l rlxmad opoity Aa3«U1n! Lsio.00B 1so0.oo0 lsaa.aoo LNIO,oao 0 11010,000 2. 0[Mf ZaMooim[ea B 0 0 0 0 0 H TOW. ..I]0pJ3 5,286,000 1.110,ON s.o9.o00 7,122,000 1.795,00 29,2611.0. 30 Bex[«a t Caff yO«[ t0 Xe.t Ydf LAII1000 H.112,0001 19.630.TO 915,185,0001 119.16E 0001 119.261.0003 BMo NIm 151 ]I Yx[vee t G[[y-Op[ hm Gat i«[ U.000 1E.000 70.000 99,000 L.A. .3,000 LC/EWC 1E a. Isry 59.000 63,000 66.000 65.000 tl.000 322,000 3] Intt[eat t Mlattll«ems InOYa 8,000 ).0. 1.000 ]A00 L000 H Ot3uf [Fox 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 'NAL R[StXOn ...... H.000 ]].0.0 12,000 12,000 3SB.000 36 . AMI.. I. 150.... I0.000 111.000 1,110, 110.000 N1.000 L2PCAXTLK9 ]] oMd .1-1W1 t tn«[d! 1.1000 ]6A00 )6000 0 73,000 3]I,000 H 0.I ..M ltud. 0 0 0 A.00 0 0 0 19 Imn WdOt2 18,000 ]L000 71.000 73.000 )].000 ]H.Ooo t0 M. 6.,ry , t0 X«t T«[ 72,000 ]0.000 191.0. 6e.0.0 gA00 67,000 JI Yea .0. My HfIM r lo, Bequ l[exn[a 72,000 70,000 69.... 68,000 61,000 61.000 JE pm6 soli m 09 lMfldq 0 0 0 0 0 0 ARN9T 13d3w«1 for InlaO-Pw1 Sdnafeul .3 8«a[wa 1 G[ry6af TIM Gat Yd1 8.136.000 I.1B9Ao0 (1,216.0001 11,311,000) Ilt'"I' Ool L126.0M II . 9L90M J.9]0.000 1.363.000 S.HIAM 7122,1000 1.H 6,000 21.5.9A00 15 ToLy,'W"om ..BO 13,046,000 9.OS2AOo 4,163,000 860.000 (I.]15,000) ]].611A00 16 1YTL 64PyDITPb 6,SS7,NO I0.370 OOo 10.S31100 12.311.000 10.]]9.Oo0 52.759.000 1) peae[raa 1 G[[y-We[ m Mest idf 4.141,000 (1.SIb000] (61369100) Ill.S01.0001 (15,014,000, I15AH.000) 1B Ndt T.['. My H[lal r L, Ngol[e M 1.e19,000 21,81.00 2,341.000 21,51,000 3.001,000 19 r10p WJfR y IOC{L.2) 21]0.000 Il N15,0001 le.]0.0001 111.13].0001 (1e.OB 1.0001 11 B.oe1.0005 COUNTY SANITATIO ' l DISTRICT NO . 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY ��x2axzo d i r U � O BUDOET RECOMMENDATIONS 1985- 1986 FISCAL YEAR COUMY Sk-TPIATI07 DlssuCr NO. 2 6/10/35 9IXrr RBTi448tTATI(M Revised 6/23/85 1985-86 FISM )'FAR Dt^aQ2IFrrO4 OR PLI]OfRlf 1TIIE 9 3-M 9 4-dS 985-86' ]983-89 1984-85 1985-86 _ 1: 1s Operating & Capital P-Pirements Operating fled 12,426,600* 15,401,000 20,168,000 Aoasnilated Capital Outlay Plnd 45,465,687* 45,931,000* 43,420,000 Facilities Revolving fled 16,528,753 20,166,000 22,188,000 SUB-40'RS, (A£WUING & CAPITAL 74,421,040 82,498,000 85,476,000 Debt Petireve nt Bond and Interest Fud - 1951 98,944 215,693 181,652 Bond and Interest Fud - 1958 550,351 1,499,521 1,323,621 Sua-ROM DM MaTP24 r 649,295 1,715,214 1,505,273 Tm RBA 75,070,335 84,213,214 86,981,Z73 FIM= Operating & Capital Ending Cash & I nvestue nts (Appropriated I�aerves and Carry Over) 59,838,220 65,789,000 65,421,000 Outer Revenue 9,808,000* 13,023,000 14,256,000 Anticipated Tax Allocaticn From 18 Levy 5,030,000 5,010,000 5,799,000 StB-1O3AL CFEr4LrMG & CAPMAL 74,676,220 83,822,000 85,476,000 Debt Retirmennt Cash & Lrn bne nts (A propriated R�rties & Carry-0cer) 366,115 Z70,214 1,3BO,273 Other Revenre 28,000 121,000 125,000 Midmt Raised by Tames for Debt Obligation -D- -0- -0' Sb-Total Debt Retirement 394,115 391,214 1,505,273 TOIAL 1TR41B4G 75,070,335 84,213,214 86,981,Z73 *Adjusted for Inter-Pled Transfers The Oaety is presently wparding tam in connection with a disptte over assessad valuation. Taxes ingnodcd as of June 30th anoint to 630,456. Q%Rd wwr R'1 a44N)=GW. 2 Revised /23i 95�ni ig5 1985-86 FL9= YM FM $2 CREPATING APPRNM APPIUM AC1U4L 1 DESCRIPITQ4 OR A=IU TrIlE BLMO IYJDMr OM--IIU7ES BUDGBf - 1983-M 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 compmM Director's Fees 1.2,000 15,000 11,202 35,000 . Cmtractual ServiceS Stare of Joint OperatiM 5,637,000 7,328,000 6,275,839 8,241,000 Tnnk Maintenance 1001000 1001000 39,529 300,000 PpLuEupP Statim Nuinterance 60,000 60,000 89,465 1D0,000 Manhole Repair 150,000 160,000 -0- 50,000 Permit a Ind. Waste Adm 160,000 180,000 191,735 250,000 Cnuectim Fee Addm 30,000 36,500 37,022 38,000 Inter-Dist, Steer Use Charge 2,000 21%0 0 2,000 Bald (bU. ticn E��se 500 1,000 152 1,000 Tax Collection Fpaise 13,000 13,000 9,300 15,000 Treasurer's Investment Alm. 6 Banking Fees 24,000 35,000 45,478 50,000 Utilities 70,000 70,000 44,462 70,000 Professional Services 20,000 20,000 3,792 2D,000 Printing and Publicatim 2,000 2,000 862 2,000 Travel E Mtg. - Directors 2,000 2,000 1,742 2,000 U=llectable Almuxnts 51000 2,500 1,467 2,000 T03AL OSMATMU 6,287,500 8,027,000 6,754,047 8,958,000 Interest 8,300 91500 9,329 ETenses AlVIlcable to Prior Years 3,000 2,500 1,000 TOTAL N21-0PII4iTDVG 11,300 12,000 9,329 1,000 7OML OPERMSC 6 N2FOPERATS6IG 6,298,800 8,039,000 6,763,376 8,959,000 RMER4N5 Appropriation for CantLngencie 2,978,800 3,343,000 6,729,000 Autlnrized General Reserve 3,149,000 4,019,000 4,480,000 TOML rdnmrlm 6,127,800 7,362,000 11,209,000 sO)-%0 R373nMINM 12,426,600 15,401,000 6,763,376 20,168,000 TNIIgEPS Transfer to Bold Fad 255,130 Transfer to AM Ftad 3,617,820 SUD-TO Ai. TA*umm 3,873,000 -O- -0- TOOL Em2mmew 16,299,600 1 15,401,000 6,763,376 20,7.68,000 C170NM WIIMTiO4 DISMCP NO. 2 PlA77e 2 BU= I emmim ais Revised 6/V/85 1985-86 PISliL YEAR FUND 42 CPERk= APM&M APPFCUM ACILU R33310= LFSIPM(N OR AOOXNT T= L4YY;ET 3%XzT EXPEMIBMS &DZT 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 AVAnAME F-ZD$p0 Cash & Investre is (Appropriated Reserves and Carry-Over) 8,998,600 7,098,000 7,426,402 10,2327,000 Fees 1,437,000 2,372,000 2,535,909 2,831,000 Interest & Misc. Receipts 675,000 712,000 973,914 1,070,D00 Delirgn t Taxes 159,000 209,000 213,912 231,000 8[B-TOM 2,Z/1,000 3,293,000 3,723,735 4,132,000 Tax Allsaticn 4,840,000 4,940,000 5,276,719 5,699,000 Redevelgmnt Agelcy Tax Pass-lhrw9h 9,207 10,000 sdi time 190,000 170,000 83,256 90,000 SUB-TOM 5,030,000 5,010,000 5,359,975 5,799,000 Transfer/Reiirtvr t frm District 13 ACD Frd 485,500 TOM AVmn.nmc EUUL% 16,299,600 15,401,000 16,995,612 20,168,000 OYI?IY SAMT100 DI5iRICP ID. 2 BUDGET I P10/85 TICW Revised 6/23/85 Lg85-86 F19ML YEAR F@D 42 AOaI43L TM CAP179L APPrOVED APPR7vID ACr-W FDZU fV&I D DESCRIP1TR4 CR ACOaM TI1IE B D(£P KEEP EXPazzium 14D(£0 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 198t 86 PFUiSM AND 07%UZ T1UPFS Treatment Plant Bomar.ion 11,939,000 10,120,000 4,237,608 9,569,000 P.7�xo�riation fa Master- Pffgrld Treatment Plant Fac. 32,439,687 27,389,000 17,516,000 Padio Linked Teleetry System 50,000 25,000 25,000 Master Plan Urdate Flow Analysis & Metering 35,000 49,000 35,054 49,000 Replace Fullerton-Brea Purchase Sectici 300,000 5,206,000 30,207 14,000,000 Liability to Anaheim fa so. Sates Are Ri%er Truk 100,000 100,000 Joint WY ks D3uity Purdhase 777,000 31.1,000 310,950 District 13 Formation 50,000 50,000 17,267 Transfer Amenation Fees and Interest to District 13 3,156,000 5,684,949 Florbased Equity Purchase 1,328,000 Eartiaq,ake/, l Danege Feserve 308,000 AFp iation for District Fac�ties Aipm ements and Eqp icn 375,000 525,000 22,677 525,000 SUB-ID7AL 45,465,687 46,931,000 10,338,712 43,420,OOJ Transfer to Bard Fud 1,324,000 1,324,000 S[B-TOIAL 1,324,000 1,324,000 101PL RD2OI.2Dmm 45,465,687 48,255,000 11,662,712 43,420,000 CXRIPY SWrVC 'N DISFRICr H). 2 Page 2 BEN= ROTIMNOPMW 6/10/85 Revised V23/85 1985-86 FI9',�I, YEAR MU 92 ^IISa47MM CAPrA1 CM Y APPR3M APr ,•:D TCi(AL RSOIVUIIFD DESCRIP'TW CR AIIXIW TTTIE EU= BU)C--:f E TOMITLMS BUXEr 1983-84 1084-85 198A-85 1985-86 AVmnxLmF AMM Cash 6 lnvesbm is (AEpropriated Reserves and Carry-Over) 35,545,867 41,149,000 41,149,323 35,535,000 Pees 765,000 1,249,000 1,045,705 1,203,000 Annexation Fees 540,000 177,373 Sale of Capacity Rights 917,000 ]26,000 Ill,066 1,252,000 Federal ar9 State Grants 1,414,000 1,899,010 (1,966 1,942,000 Interest 5 Misc. Raxipts 2,666,000 3,832,000 4,716,580 3,478,000 SUB-TOAL 6,302,000 7,106,000 6,048,758 7,885,000 Transfer fran Operating Elyd 3,617,820 TOAL AVAIIA E FIP MP3 45,465,687 48,225,000 47,198,081 43,920,000 CoMnY s^_*TPM=Cti DI5'1RICr W. 2 Pi�ee 1 EDDUET R33a- -MATIMS 6/10/85 Pe ise3 6/23/85 ]985-86 ETSML YMR FEM 42 FACILITIES P.6WLVLW APPRDM APPR7sID ACTDA . RBmdl'.��IIZm OE9C2IPIICN OR ACOOLIT TTIIF. AMU EEDGEr EBP.oIDTAM BUX-,T _ 1983-H 1984-85 ].984-85 1985-86 PFI1�fi5 AND EFMIT[BiE^u Carbm Cm, Dam P/S vulifiratrm 250,000 250,000 168,807 10,000 South River Tank Exb nsim 105,000 240,000 240,000 Oran3ethorpe Tnnk Ca ction to SARI 150,000 300,000 51 E lid Pelief Trmk Sewer 3,065,000 4,ODO,000 397,365 5,710,000 Fa&r eft Interceptor Seer 5,901,753 9,386,000 32 5,671,000 Carbm Cailm Sewer Ext nsim 2,740,000 500,000 Capacity) -Dist 11 6,557,000 6,557,0DO Limoln Interoeptrx Sewer 250,000 259,351 Taft IntercepKu Se r 2,500,000 47,615 2,500,030 Tracsfx OZviectim Foes m District 13 14,740 A�op�iatirn foc District Facilities :ts & F]cte[sias 500,000 500,000 700,000 T03PL Maju7Fam 16,528,753 201166,000 877,961 21,888,000 Cth`IIY SMIPIIMON FIISMCf NO. 2 Yd9e 2 HfDCk3' CES b/10/85 F�ised 6/23/85 1985-86 ELM% YEAR Revised 6/24/85 EtM #2 FACnX 7f5 FW,i$VW APPR7JID A1ERJ89 ACTUAL I DEDCFaP= OR ACES 7= SI7C£f 3D - E MEND11SII8'.4 800(93" 1983-64 L984-85 1984-85 1985-86 AVAILABLE FI14= Cash 6 Imestffilts oprogriated R6eRC5 & Carry-Over) 15,293,753 17,542,000 17,541,994 19,649,000 Carwtim Fees 580,000 730,000 852,152 750,000 Interest In=e 655,000 1,494,000 2,132,778 1,489,000 UP frm City of Orange 400,000 S D-� 1,235,000 2,624,000 2,%4,930 2,239,000 TOM AVAMAM E1I4'.III9G 16,528,753 M,166,000 20,526,92A 21,888,000 Clans SANrMaMa9 DISI CT M. 2 6/10/85 BODC;EP Baas 1985-86 FISB+L YEAR FM #2 BaM 6 DMRMT - 1951 APIIUM APPFOUM AMAL R002404IED _ DOMPIMa4 at A030 f 7= B Ewr BU)= EXPEM UM BCYIGEP 1983-84 1984-85 1984-65 1985-86 BOND REMUDEW MM MTEEWr Pr=ipal m Braids 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 Interest m Bvd.. 6,131 5,063 3,468 3,937 TOML 51,131 50063 48,468 48,937 AUMaZ® OFFML IMM 47,813 165,630 132,715 TOmL FIFWnmII m 98,944 215,693 181,652 AVUIABIE MOM Cash a Irn sbm is ftl=priated B� a Carry Oaei) 62,551 48,693 48,699 168,652 DaUngumt Tm Interest s Misc. R�pts 5,000 15,000 16,421 13,000 s -717AL 5,000 15,000 16,421 13,000 AMIIM TO BE MI6ED BY M%)W TRAFM4EM Rrm ClERVM ]0 F" 31,393 - MWEE t E%M AM FIIID 152,000 152,000 TOML ArAMAEKI � FLPD= 98,944 215,693 217,120 181,652 Outstanding G.O. Binds 6/30/85: $180,000 Firal Pay t Late: August, 1988 QIIBUY -CAN CN Dl9MCI' NO. 2 6/10/85 BCCGET RS:I�Qz 1985-86 FMAL YEAR FUM ¢2 B= & RAT - 1958 APPFCFAD APPIUM ACI%L IE0314= _ DESCK=(N Q2 AMD= Tr= ffiDGEB BMGET FJ03 MUM BU EP 1983-M 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 3M IETIPSIFS11' AM 7I1I= Priunils). on Bvurls 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Interest m Bonds 44,250 32,625 21,652 21,000 TOM 344,£0 332,625 321,652 321,000 AUUI8RI= (;ESL BEME 206,101 1,166,896 1,002,621 TOM RMOYRUMME 550,351 1,499,521 1,323,621 A,UmnaaM FMIM4O Cash & I vesbnauts carry-um) 303,564 221,521 221,$3 1,211,621 Delinquent Tares -fr Intereet & Misc. Iateipts 23,000 106,000 139,720 112,000 SOB'IOIAL 23,000 106,000 139,720 112,000 AM= 7O BE Ii4IS8D BY M*W '1SW M EM4 OFEMTW FM 223,797 'IIAIEM FF M Am FQ.0 1,172,000 1,172,000 7074,E AVA31AELS FIDDING 550,351 1,499,521 1,533,273 1,323,621 Outstanding G.O. Bonds 6/30/85: $1,300,000 Final Paynast Date: January, 1989 �5 I! - i mmm(6am'R�i 0[SI1R(S W. 2 � s3��m90¢Q'Q)�CIIa 6Y3R1 PAl1IDCC3 p at 1bra1 CI.P. 198SB6 L66 7 1 76 19w6 L%9-% )_a l 1991i2 Fla A,alysls b)7ete�Lg 0.1 fat 3,m0 a,= A,= Rad10 LINei 1t]me[ry 6Panan (al 25rm0 E,mo P �Sa 4m 62 8 0.)la) 1A,256rm0 8/,m0 3,Om,= 6.m0,= 3,=,= Liffilllty w Ma1 C SwN Sate Pm Ml� � (a) =,m0 m0,m0 OeFe[9re31 P[vla%� la) 525,m0 3rm0 ]SrmO 75,Om ]S,mO Fi,mO Fi,mO ]S.mO swmxat 14,09,m0 315,m0 1,Il4.Om B,WS,mO 3.0/4.000 75.m0 95,Om 75.Om ]SrmO Cain Cm O M mw. 2-24 (1)(a) ]BOA= 1701m0 10,= SwM Btaet 1 4trieb, (a) 2m,m0 240r000 lt.) fon. b °s3�'Va qe of(m 3m,mB 13,mo za],om aeua Bat 1 Boat 2-I A (2)(a) 6.m0Am 3m Am S,m0,m0 510,m0 FairviM t LRetmpmc B r 2-23 (3)(b) L3,1%Am M,000 14Sm,Om SIMI= 3eg SOOI= m0r000 Cain Sex[ ' HReuim tm (3(3)(a) 2,740rm0 2,74Or6m Bm five OYuik RAW (3)(cl 535,m0 535,m0 B.L�6 reU1 (3)(el 3M,000 315,m0 Ocli Pela11e1 (2)(b) 3,m0Am 31=1= 2�-6-2 (2)(a rSomas 2,M,= a,= 1,500.0m 1,m0,m0 C.V.Lty Hd—Irs (a) 6,55],m0 6,56],m0 OMa 6 U ParJe (b) m0,m0 Im,Om 1m,m0 1m,m0 ]m,m0 m0,m0 Im,Om Bp,mO 33.881.m0 ]82Am 6.B10,m0 ],I6]Am 2.30,m0 3B2Am 100.000 1.1m.0m 1911951M p1p� Pa Plat (c) 32.m0Am a,m0,m0 CWPL RO@L eo.em.aoB 1.m7.mo m.me.om ss,2az.am s.us.om ew,mo 175.000 zrs.m6 o.zro,mo ((((ab) ftuY IVYam ( ttaLly tt�tled 1 f �C) trr-piaawwd tsMUm ay Wa mW 3. getrp ta Um adwbW tncam 2c fv aeaiq)crosWmHm 0/95 WVNiY &W[iAi[ON nl SiR[R M. ] Pevl aed 6/11/83 BTR]TJ1CR OI PRV8RG0 8 =49- Ree bed 6/U/BS PI%AL YGb 19B5-B6 ]XMWN {H9-90 LtpB .."I. 190]-66 1906-87 1991-0 1980- 89 1909-90 ]-Tee[ Loral ORMRNG PSMD j 1 Reemtwe f Cm[[yLva[ from U., Teet 14,237.000 11,20,1000 11,055,000 12,041,000 ll.tl1.a00 1st-01).000 3 R MOB 2 SM90 Of la Tax Allocation .10301000 6.513.000 7,034,000 2s]).... .12121.00 35131,1000 2 Peea 1.B Sir 000 Sr231ra00 ].]]3M. 4,204,000 4.924.000 19,021,000 6 Intervm! a Nlewllmwue Ircew 1.O1a.00o 1r150.000 1,112.00 1d01,000 400,000 3.0Ir00 S ONor P...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1OC.L Re96X01 9.931.000 10"1.1000 11d39.000 13,01,1000 14,236,000 60.101.000 3 2O271,AM1W0 ..w 20,161,000 22,133,00 23,014,000 15,112,000 25,418,000 7O.3U.900 BABXB[]aAPB I 0Mn 6(Joint YOAa X a 0 B,SSIAO 1,1]4000 10.60A00 12,534.O90 1b114,600 $3,561.000 on 1 I ..'' ce Byato N f 0 eM ONa[ OBee. )19,a0a 11.1.0. $0,0110 151,000 1.01110. 4,301,000 l0 ONat eapndltuue 0 0 0 0 0 a 11 0O, 60GR1ITOR0 01,59,000 10018,000 11,790,000 13,410,000 IS,411.000 59.951000 1 12 MMnae f C... O r as Neat Yta[ 11.309,000 I1.455.00 12,041.000 U.622,00 10.312,000 10.312,000 u Nat 1.1'a Or, Miss forcing POILI wte IA80,000 5.331.000 5,996000 6d13,000 ).)J31000 7,732,040 11 Pwd Balance 0[ (Ml101t) 6.)19.000 6.)]L a00 6.I62,0 c 4,1]].000 216SI1000 3.69.000 Ca`rM PIRI0(6) Meetma a Cax[y-Ow0 from Last Year 5511MOO. If IS 1,00 21,03,1000 11,170,000 111,000 $5,101,000 OFFIffixi 11 Cwatxvmllm Gxenas 1,9t2�000 111000 IL 000 961000 IGIAO. 1.11.400 lS T00, Concoction 750,eo0 ]]0,000 7S0.0aa 710.0aa no.east I.,Solo.. u aa0at I.zO J,aoO LI6L':.Do LsaO.aoo Le20.00o Ltm.oao snob aoo 33 .ale Of Capacity Blot. 1,26L 000 I,196,000 2eo.oao Ilfiao. o J.00.o00 20 [nta0et a X1e011mawa 1.— 4,961,000 1,U1.000 1,793A00 580'... 0 10.70.000 21 PIOr Mssd Bqufly Ad3Oa0m! 1 0 0 0 0 0 ' 23 OtM[ i.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 TOOL RMNOt IO.I11.000 6.911.00 4,413,000 51199,400 3,037,040 18.806.000 t 0 TOOL A.IAIM f0Ni.G 65.300,000 31,320,000 20,414M0 15.1691000 319,11000 03.990,000 tRPCRI'NRM ;. 2S m.Mr. 0! JOlnt YOIN. 2uatMnt pant 9.1.110.0 11.O1o.00o I1115B.000 1b590.00 I1.a01.000 11.111 a00 District C011mrml System 10,O24.000 13.1U.000 S,4LS,000 t62'... 1]3.000 31,31010.0 IT Pa low, ..act A9[aennt Paymnla 0 0 0 0 a 1 1 o 21 —..ad folly Mjuawno 1.120,000 0 0 0 0 L121.000 39 Other efgMltupa 0 0 0 0 0 :d IO SOW. ®p03100Pd 10.9]1.000 27,210,000 16.)]3,000 15.052.000 12,379A0 91.615.000 '�. 31 Meaawe a C... Cea[ t0 Xa at Taa[ 41.I.I.MO 24,030,000 11,670,000 11].000 IB,1I5.0001 I1.625.0001 non radB(a( 32 Maatvaa a Ca[[yCw[ PIm Last Tea[ 113001000 1,,"Do, 172,000 541,000 110.a00 1g00.000 33 Tex Lroy 0 0 0 a 0 0 { 31 [.terser f Xbttusnams hwvna 125,000 10o,oao 7l,a0a 11.000 19.000 351,000 .� is Oscar Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 .;l 31 TO2RG OVBNGt 125,000 100,000 )I.00 16.000 19,000 JS1.00 1 3T TRAL AVAtL6BIE f0110 DxG 1.505.000 IR13.000 914,000 S72.000 19l 0., 1 b1Aa0 1 BIPMO1. I0 B,md Rlnclpl f Inte[ess 320,000 392,000 4O1,000 311,000 0 1,331000 39 ONax 6x,aMlt ... 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 TOOL tL0OlT 320.00 162.000 401.000 399A00 0 1,334,000 Il Rseexna f Ce[xy-Omar DoNut Yae[ 1.Ib.000 923000 03.000 170,000 IA.OM 197.000 12 ...t Taa['. 0.. MrIM PwdIM no,occents 1.135.00 073.000 01.00 118,000 UTA00 197.O0. 13 Pwd Wara. Ot (Oa i.10 0 0 0 0 0 0 BWNARY (Adjusted for Inter-PUW Transform( tl M.o[vea I Carry-Ova, From M.a xa.r 66,40,000 56.734000 31,750,000 24,257,000 11,917,000 16101.000 45 T2O4 PDAN06 2G ne0.000 17.947.aoa 16.U].Ooa 1404000 18.092,090 41,213.00 16 TOTAL Us. POtmM 06.9011000 71,179,000 3I,201r000 40,959.000 M.09.000 156,014,000 " 7 TYOL ...I. MUM., 37.920.000 28.SI4.000 20.911,000 20,045,000 154,100,00 t0 Aeaana. a C. ryCn[ b Nax! Yee[ 51,731,000 16.]L.a00 2a.131.000 1L91].000 - 1,91.1000 1.964000 t9 Na.t Yee['s ory Pa[bi PUMLy A.'I'...nu 51615.000 1,007,000 6.1]5.000 61,23,000 7,930,000 1,920,000 30 20A9 BRIJXCB m (OVICRI $1,116,000 l0 ASL 000 V.BJIA00 1.99a.000 13.966.0001 _I3.966.0001 COUNTY SANI i ATION DI6TRICT NCB . 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY 1 �1y "IT-To r 9 meµ,,, H.. , ' A U m O�OE' CO� BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1985 - 1986 FISCAL YEAR OXMY SAFir1A.T1CN DISIMCr 1-13. 3 lD/85 H10G�Il' RE O1S Revised �23/65 1985-86 FTSX YEMR SCFrv,IS DF CRIMON OR AL DOW TIOIE gx)mT BMGW B[DC�T - 7983-84 1984-85 1985-86 > LS Operating & Capital Required is Operating FL d 10,754,000* 13,686,000 17,411,000 Aaavmilated Capital Outlay EUd 40,767,069 42,144,919* 42,944,000* Feoilities Revolving Flyd 9,774,623 10,476,000 11,670,000 sm-4OO1L OFERU4N0 Am CAPrDL 60,795,692 66,306,919 72,025,000 Debt Retirement Rind and Interest Flyd - 1951 6 1958 999,857 964,276 919,588 SO3-2C>mL DEBT REMMM 999,857 964,276 919,588 103AL R92MMUM 61,795,549 67,271,195 72,944,588 FFFDING Operating & Capital Ftrding Cash a Irneshnents 0Wmpriated Reserves and Cory-Over) 46,721,333 50,397,000 53,101,000 Other Revenue 8,086,000* 9,958,000* 11,617,000 AMidmted Tax A17.ocatim Ftcm 18 Levy 6,470,000 6,448,000 7,610,000 SUB-MML OMMMG 5 CAPITAL 61,777,333 66,803,000 72,328,000 Debt Retirement Cash a lrwesbnents 0 ropriated y Over)Reserves 6 Carr 482,216 406,195 570,588 Other Revenue 36,000 62,000 46,000 An=t. Raised by Taws for Debt Oblirptim -0- -0- -0- SOB-1O1AL D®T IEMIR•AIINT 518,216 486,195 616,588* TOM FUMING 6L,795,549 67,Z71,195 72,944,588 * Adjusted for interfapsd transfers ing inn axm�ie U is Wirth a eipnw the oassessed f 30th an comt to Su,'98�°.1II1ded as OJfi M SAWT14»TTO4 DISTRICT WA. 3 Page 1 33)GEr RE0241ENCAMES Revised 6 10 85 1985-86 FIFSA,L YEAR RM 83 OPEPA' APPRIM APPrOM) ACIM 1 IIFD MCRI1SO4 OR AO]' M TMZ FiDGEl' 3XGEP FDOINDrIUW BUDGET - 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 OPEPAI'iWG Dirwbor's Feas 13,000 18,000 18,482 20,000 Csntractlial Servies Share of Joint Operating 5,665,000 7,247,000 6,4181833 8,814,000 Trunk Mainntenacice ll0,000 132,000 79,955 165,000 Mmtrrle Repair 100,000 172,000 28,199 100,000 RUP Station Malntenanoe 99,000 1101000 98,419 110,000 Permit & Ind. Waste Adn. 178,000 148,000 84,775 148,000 OT�om�, -cpoign Fee hen.se Chg. 173,0o0a0 29,000 24,768 28,000 &xdrm tim rE)Pevse 1�WS 1,000 3,692 4,000 ,,�1''aaxx Collection 6,000 326 11000 ]br000 ]6,000 ]b,326 19,000 Treasurer's Investment Adm. & Banking Fees 14,000 25,000 34,053 40,000 Utilities 120,000 120,000 108,259 120,000 Professional Services 20,000 20,000 317 20,000 Printing and Publicatim 1,500 1,500 1,352 1,500 Travel & Mtg. - DireCmrS 1,500 1,500 1,123 1,500 th=llecteble A¢aIDts 10,000 2,000 2,000 TOM OPERBBM4G 6,319,000 8,047,000 6,918,553 9,594,000 Na;-CP FVdM,IG Expenses Applicable to Prior Years 7,000 4,000 81 2,000 TOML N -OPERATING 7,000 4,000 81 2,000 TOTAL 01EPAMC & Na4 4 6,326,000 8,051,000 6,918,634 9,596,000 le;SERMS Appropr3atim for Ocntingeocie 1,265,000 1,610,000 3,017,000 Authorized Gasral Reserve 3,163,000 4,025,000 4,798,000 TOM RMERUM 4,428,000 5,635,000 7,815,000 SIB-1O1AL R@2Jn FS VM 10,754,000 13,696,000 6,918,634 17,411,000 ORREEEIIIS Transfer to Bond F1ad 481,641 Transfer to AOO Fvd 2,341,959 sm-101AL 1PPISMS 2,M,600 TOTAL FEX MIvem 13,577,600 13,686,000 6,918,634 17,4ll,000 COURN S9NrJPMC V DI9Tf=LT 1D. 3 ppaal�ee 2 BUXXT IMMIN MATICNS 6/1 /85 Revised 6/23/85 19e5-86 BTSQ+L YEAR FUND $3 CFEMO iG APPRIEM APPR'JM ACILM RMIMN&D DE930:PrIW CR ACOMM TP14E Ef E0CGM EnIRO UMS E4EGET 1983-94 1984-85 1984-65 1%5-86_ A.mrTamn FUDING Cash E I+RRsbl is (7 rated Fesenxs and Carry Over) 5,575,600 4,455,000 4,800,980 7,204,000 Foes 916,000 841,000 1,315,419 1,552,000 Interest 6 Misc. Receipts 400,000 437,000 687,111 749,000 D-UnWent Tames 216,000 214,000 7/3,976 296,000 SUB-,R71AL 1,532,000 1,492,000 2,276,506 2,597,000 Tax AllMstim 6,228,800 6,228,000 6,936,526 7,492,000 Sbventias 24IF200 220,000 109,477 118,000 SUB-Tom . 6,470,000 6,448,000 7,046,003 7,610,000 Transfer fms AM 1,291,000 TOMAVAIIABD3 MOMMOM13,577,600 ]3,686,000H14,123,489 17,411,000 CXM 3+Ni=aq DISTRICT NO. 3 5p/alype 1 BUXEr 10Da +tZ�A aZ ReviSed 5/23/85 1985-86 FISAL YEAR FUM #3 ACSSVT= CAPrTAL APPEOM APPFCM ACIM R024eM DMMPZCN Qi ACDOrM 'ffUE HD(£f BUDGET F7RRIDTIDEW BLUGEr 1903-84 1984-85 1%4-85 1985-86 PRIM= AND EXPE DITURSS Treatment Plant Egansi 12,464,000 10,395,000 4,358,683 10,234,000 Appropr.�atm for Master- Played Treabr t Plant Fac 27,618,069 28,757,919 26,948,000 FeviWrse Ours CSD's for Seal. Bead, B1cd. Pmp Statim Equity 85,000 85,000 85,000 radio Linked Telenetry Sysbam 40,000 25,000 25,000 Inml Age cT MwtDle Remturc^^int Program 400,000 Westside Relief Trunk Raccn. 220,000 8 220,000 Frntt Interceptor 100,000 Flow Analysis a Metering 60,000 62,000 109,332 Iae Alamitos Trench pocnstrwtim 217,963 32,000 Miller-Holder Mmi ole Vault IL., anent 1,900,000 870,000 21100,000 Flarbased Equity Purchase 3,771,000 Eart7nquake/Flood Dale AReser a 329,000 Fxilitiesm or and a t mims 500,000 700,000 81181 700,000 SB+1l7W. 40,767,069 42,144,919 5,564,167 42,944,000 Transfer to Operating find 1,291,000 Transfer to Bond F1rd 496,081 496,081 303,000 TIBAL FIETn NENIH 40,767,069 43,932,000 6,060,248 43,247,000 GXkU!Y S*TfD TQ4 DISMCP NO. 3 Page 2 BLUMT RSXK49 MCtS 6/10/85 Pe ise9 6/23/85 1985-86 FISTi. YEAR FEW S3 AMMA'® CAPTPAL CUM Y APPrCFJM APPRDI4 ACITML RaMnMff FD DESCRI IICN OR AOaxw MEE BDGET 3MCET EXPENDITMES BLC£P 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 AIMJIAIIR EWING Ca(pshh & Imesbm is Caazry�hcr� Reserves and 32,831,11.0 36,948,000 35,948,252 35,637,000 Joint Works Equity Sale 320,000 9111000 910,640 118,000 Federal and State Grants 1,476,000 11951,000 880 2,077,000 Fees 420,000 516,000 591,482 680,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 916,000 90,000 114,240 1,296,000 Interest & Misc. F� ipls 2,462,000 3,516,000 4,131,356 3,439,000 SM-110M 5,594,000 6,984,000 5,748,598 7,610,000 Transfer frm Operating Fud 2,341,959 Tom AAA AmE Rmm 40,767,069 43,932,000 41,696,850 43,247,000 ox sue' 3 Wised �/85 1985-86 FMIL YEAR EUV 03 FACIL US RFXCLAR4O FSPIM ED APPiOM APAtIIJ® PLUM I43aP&IdFD 1& M1T W Qi A=RW =E EuDmr HIIDm' E!D£1ID1rJMS EAMP 1983-U 1984-85 1984-85 1985-M Artesia Brandt SUY'& tk Relief 135,000 2D0,000 2001000 Miller Holder Relief (3-48) 460,000 1,000,000 Miller Bolder lelief (3-4A) 625,000 400,000 LWLal Relief Inbero=_ptor 500,000 460,000 460,000 Orange Western SdYl k 520,000 521,000 521,000 Parallel Lampson Brarrh Hoover-Wzstem 95,000 125,000 125,000 Homer-WWb m Stb-7 k Relief 290,623 375,000 375,000 Ratella Interceptor Sewer 650,000 390,000 333,474 L 12tescephrr, Ruhes c U BY4 650,000 315,000 315,000 La Habra Purcase Relief 1,800,000 11800,000 Capacity Enfwge-Dist 2 S ll 4,409,000 4,409,000 Magnolia Interceptor, Beach 30 700,000 700,000 Ice Alamitos Sub Trmk Relief 3,000,000 2,000,000 ra Ramrd Ave. Sulficb Control Statim 35,000 35,000 Racer Miller Holder Purchase 750,000 Vop iatim for District ilities LhQ[ eats and ExbahsimS 190,000 1,155,000 730,000 TOM IO2IIRFP M 9,774,623 10,476,000 333,474 31,670,000 AVAIIAHm Purr= (ash 6 Invesb�ts Onxcp .ated Reserves & Carry Over) 8,314,623 8,994,000 8,994,365 1D,260,000 Caractim Fees; 336,000 575,000 532,742 550,000 Interest Irtaare 624,000 907,000 1,066,469 860,000 SUB-TOML 960,000 1,482,000 1,599,211 1,410,000 TOM AMUTAM FUMING 9,774,623 10,476,000 10,593,576 11,670,000 t O0[M1Y SPI4TI CN rISTKCT NO. 3 6/10/85 BOOEr I HIMM ATICNS 1985-86 FL M .MR FLIM #3 BRAD L IM1EFEST - 1951 5 1958 APPrOM APPRYM ACITM 1 OESCRIPIEN CR A03XW TITLE 8D(8P BLUZEr EMDTIIM BUXET 1983-94 1984-85 1%4-85 1985-86 BW WaRDEM NI�II1 DrMl 3P PriWipal M Bads 535,000 535,000 535,000 535,000 Interest m Bands 81,807 61,913 41,411 41,976 TOM 616,807 596,913 576,431 576,976 A0MZED I>EI4EM IUMM 383,050 367,363 342,612 TOOL F472711tFom 999,857 964,Z76 919,588 AUUTAWE F[PDIM Cash S 3mRsbn is o vm) R ��w 6 482,216 406,195 406,232 570,588 OPTIrgmt Tv Interest 6 Misc. Pa ipts 36,000 62,000 74,076 46,000 319-101AL 36,000 62,000 74,076 46,000 AM W TO BE MISM BY WES 712MEKa ERCM OPERMI14G FM 481,641 TPRE DER ERM AII1 RM 496,OB1 496,081 303,000 TOML AVAIIAIIIE RWIMG 999,857 964,276 976,389 919,588 Outsbnding G.O. Bards 6/30/85: $2,219,000 Final Pay t Irate: 1951 - August, 1990 1958 - Jaunary, 1989 VWSS Pevi>ai 6✓2]/85 C]RrtYQ4 DISLRCI'b. 1 SO6311rE Drat a w[ld M S15hM PP]hLS emi�e soul c.x.e. 190f% Lmsar 19e'i-m 19ee-a9 19e9-90 :99o-91 lmlaz [�Alauhu '1tW, Haar ataccim (al 250,w0 216,Ow Ulm Paaio r T..Wr Syama (a) a,wa 31000 Rlnhuse O C. S fS Seel 9mC,a1W. P/5 sgdtr (al e5.000 851000 1-1]fiery Mao Pa� —t Payee (al 400.000 300.000 )00,w0 w®mi2 Fellef (a) PeaetructJm (al 2a1,000 IIO,wa poet L�r wr Aq[ (a) 100.000 100,0w Mills Vailc k Repla>are,c (avL : t (a) 21900,000 6M,w0 115001000 WO,wO Mis¢llaiays Pmjsm (el 7001000 lOO,mw 100,w0 100,Ow 1001000 1011.000 100.0D0 100.w0 SLLaM1ttal tm F1rid /,'lSO,wO 1.OBB,000 2,]62,000 0001000 100,w0 1w.Ow 1001000 !00,000 300,Cw A[�La 84'arcd,SiWLcmk Pellet (l)(el 2w,w0 2001000 Millet SOldar P of (}e)(3) 1,0w,w0 I10001000 (c) MLU1 Palder ftU1 (Ya) (3) 400,050 4001000 (c) rq.s PU f (3) 40,000 450,Ow O(a) PxlleE Sher YS(2)(a) 550.000 S,wO 91,w0 Parallel[av(m,Naetiestl )(a) m (3)(a) ]E,Ow ]25,w0 Ha�eccksmm S,f 1aPUiet (3)W m ltaek OI(a) 3/S.Ow 304,Ow ]- 2 (2)(a)�rceptx r 312,0D0 D,wO 3LS,w0 Mao ua P of se er (3)(a) 700.000 700.000 [aa Nsmtca Sib'Rmk r.U.f 3,000,000 3,000,000 OHM U e Pim'iaae a. a (3)(a) 1,800.000 1.600.000 &am,e 6 d At Su i&C =l smm (a) 35.wO M'M Ce ity bdh (a) 4,4w,000 414w1000 MLasllam,e (e) 'PoO,wO 100,w0 1001000 100,000 100.000 100.000 lo0,Ow 100,ow sb-1bm1 FR flrrl 14.w6,Ow S6,w0 ]JS.wO 5,]4$r000 2,T35,Ow 3.95.w0 1110010D0 `AO,wO 3]01]00 CAtD 10I6L -- 1a,646,000 1,1N,Ow 2,491,0w 6,145,w0 2,a35,000 /,025,000 1,aw,Ow Ew.L00 400.w0 lal w,4,Y M L M .-p1d061 facllid.p UY War mn4aeMm (W ParnallY Ra4fad 2. MmmterVimaal fsmu. PrevnclY older deaig, Icl Pas fvtlad L MBrer-PiHaBI fa U. Y f fume deelgr4/Ommt, u2vss CCoxeY S.WIw pmi ,Cou M. ] ka1.e0 6/xL83 nA'P.JOse a PWaPttto G9x 1KN - rtscw xaaz ues-eb Tvwcv nn-9a 1In oeXP1eTIW ILS-ai 196E-61 9j 7-M 19a@-09 1969-90 S-Tu[ ,I.! OPCGTPm PI9D I kat[raa t Cat'T ' P. Oat Yea[ 7,204,000 11915,000 1,121,... E.1+0.000 S.652.0e0 ........ 0. ] yes If N Tat AllmtlOn 1,906,000 8,538,060 91221,000 2.1.1 000 IJ.156.000 6Je0.JJ0 _ ] reea LSlx.0a0 11779 ),010,000 3.1eL000 3,H1,000 SO,)99,J00 i [nu[eat { Nbwllanaoua Is'Ow )+9,OW ]Bs.000 161,000 i58.000 IS1.J00 ).+O+,J00 ! Otee[ "venue a a 0 0 0 3 i tote, PAVVPYaP 10,207,000 11,102,000 12.0EE.000 1..91..W0 13.69+.oaa 60,111,001 1 1OW. AMIWR .1. 11.i1L000 UA11.000 19.9 U.000 NI,E9 a.00o 19.1{6.... 61.1O7000 TZPCIa 2Ty0.P9 e .MI. of JOlnt +Otto N { O 6,914,00o 10,136,000 11.6n1000 11,10 s.0a0 ls.u6a0a sf.aas.0a0 9 C<umtlm syate. n i 0 aM oes., op[. lex.000 e6o.000 nc.eaa LaLL.JaO 1.us.aoa +,n i,00o to Oeoat 2v,eMleu[u O 0 a o 0 0 1l . ..1. 9.596.J00 I0.996.Oo0 12,603,000 31.E+6.000 11,1111.00 6b202.000 la ee "Im. { Ca[[yb[et to Met Tea[ 7,915,000 7,911.00. 1.1E0,000 S.eSx,000 1,185.00o LN5.000 l] ..1 yeaty 0[y "[led refill Me,ul[egnte +.198.000 S.+n.000 61302,000 7,21].000 112,11000 . 23L OCO la ruse Mln¢e O[ (CmElult) 3,017,000 ].UL.I0 11038,000 (11371,0001 (51096,000, 15.096.O,01 PRm53) 15 kae[wa i Cur,Cw[ P. NR Ynt E5.891,000 40,415,000 21,P7,000 15.E04,000 2,263.000 +S.BP.000 RYP911r 11 Can:eMctloo ceann 2,011,000 91,000 11.000 921MG 11051,000 3,322.000 11 reeae Cme-eeLm 550,000 530.000 150,100 550,000 SSO.000 E.750.000 l9 One1 1001000 18E.000 .19,... 11.1.1000 1.119.000 l9 Sete OP Ceyelty sl9Xn 1,196,000 E]3.000 ]D.000 1*11).000 5.9U.Jo0 10 I......I { N is-11 me.. Awes E,E99.000 l.]]E.000 3.07e 000 B1l.0o0 0 1J.S16.OW 21 rtar0.aee bqultr Adluaeamt 0 O o 0 a o 22 too., AaVe lu.0oo o s a a ISa.1:00 23 TOV1 r1VF9O6 1.O,,Ms E.993. 00 1.80L000 611M.N0 2J92,000 27,)0E.000 2+ lOGL AMl.w fl]Im1XC 14,917,000 85.108.000 ]O.to,In0 21,994,000 5,057,000 11.2011 ON 6tY�D[TOefS ]S aLee O( Joist Ymso Ttntaent Plmt 10,23+,000 12.086.000 R.141.000 15.60E.000 11.362.000 641]6.a00 26 Olat[lt, C011actlm system 2.+911000 61+5,W0 2,815.000 +.02S.000 1.200.000 16,1o2.C00 11 kWe'm.mMI Aqn t Payamn 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Plar-Otaed wit, ae)...1 1.111.000 0 0 0 0 1.111.000 29 OW[ 9mom ie.... 0 0 0 0 0 a 10 . ..miyomys 1E,502.000 19.0]L 000 I4,992.000 19.6E9.000 I'All.m. 92.51Ltto 31 kvtvea { Cuey ' t0 ....y[at EO,415, 00 21,31LOo0 I5.201.000 2,215,000 19.+I0.0001 e9.in A001 aRm mmcs) 12 Peae[tea t Pu eySte[ rem Ya Mme Miles, 313,000 345,000 349,000 ".000 511 000 Of]PYIR ]3 Tat Use 0 525.000 515.000 ]09.000 d 1.Ei9.000 ]E Ivta[nt { Xlamlla . I. E1,000 )+.000 15,000 19.000 3.000 116,000 l5 oz., 1- 301A00 0 0 0 0 ]0],000 la TOLLL PS9C06 119.000 $59,00, $50,000 22e.000 1.000 1.109.1.0 31 TOW. AM .. FINDING 9EO,OOO "I 000 895.000 51,1000 31.000 L]59.300 r2PRmtTWEIS Ie eme "Irclpl { lnteteae 511.000 55L000 511.000 542,000 R,000 2.21,1000 ]9 0., Btpntl Ruwe 0 0 0 a 0 0 +0 SO➢.L Popcoo. ON6 517.000 S57.000 5+1.000 S42.0a0 1i.000 L2$9.000 LL "aetve. { Cattyive[ to ..I Tea[ 3.3.000 315.000 1U,000 le'"s 0 0 n ...o some.. 0" P.Itw Mdb9 ms Metes[. 343,000 US.... 348,000 1+.000 focus o J 13 rd 6ala0 me ldeaclq 0 0 0 0 0 9 !m_NNy ("Jose. see xnn[-MC T.Mtf.'a) .1 eekevea 6 c .. -CMe, P. too. Max 53.61L000 48.513.000 ]1,6+],000 22.893.000 s.15L000 13.112.000 ES NmL M2eNOr 11.155.000 11,654,000 16.]61.000 19.e16.000 I6.6881000 #9.17S.O. E6 TOP[. AM'.. PmmINO 1P,827.a00 IS.221.000 51,OE4,000 42J66.000 21d39.W0 142.047.000 i1 TOGV. ®Cm1M6 24.611.000 30,W4,000 21J32,000 34,117,000 ]1,014A00 b9.011,I. EB kaavea { Ca[.y�Ove[ toNeat Tea. 46115E.a00 34.1U.040 22,812,000 B.ISLOOJ (6.21S.0001 16.225A001 E9 Met 1. s O[y Pe[1W Nndly 9equ4aeanto S.ILL.000 5.843.060 6,Is..... 2,251.00J 8/201,000 e.391,000 50 PPm Y(.SMQ OR (DEFICIT) 43,011,000 21.900.000 16.]43,000 694.000 13+.506.0001 11+.506.09a1 adVEA -WDSI-� 986 G - 9g6 L SNOliVGNE] WWOODa iDocin8 T F - O CZ `�'o1sw3•T�� J.ir"nOO En. NVUO -� O 9 ' ON NOUViINVS AiNiIOO COMY SANTTA= OISIRICT FD. 5 6/10/85 BUDGET ROMSENDATI0:S Revised 6/19/85 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR Nmu- S D4flld Df56IPTT24 CR A11CMU S TITLE BUDGET BDGET BUDGET 1983-M 1984-85 1985-86 his operating & capital Re@iirements Operatin3 find 2,607,050} 3,116,000 3,878,000 Accuml_ted Capital Outlay Fled 8,93B,983 8,694,000 10,671,000 Fsilities Revolving 1ud 196,990 297,000 1,013,000 S[B-TOTAL OPERATING & CAPTIAL 11,743,023 12,107,000 15,562,000 Debt Retirere t Bald arc1 Interest PITd - 1951 46,710 45,885 45,060 SB-TOTAL REM04ENT 46,73.0 45,885 45,060 TOML R32JIR WIS 11,789,733 1.2,152,885 15,607,060 P rm Operating & Capital ft dilg Cash & Imestnmte (Appropriated Reserves and CarrrOrec) 8,407,523 8,412,000 9,396,000 Other Revenue 2,015,500R 2,315,000 4,465,000 Anticipated Tax Allocation Fran 18 Levy 1,320,000 1,380,000 1,701,000 SUb-Total Operating & Capital 11,743,023 12,107,000 1.5,562,000 Debt Retire t Cash & Invesbm is ropriated Reserves & Carry-0c�er) 23,767 25,090 24,300 Other Rwerve 21000 2,500 3,000 Aaa t Raised try Tames for Debt Obligation 20,943 18,295 17,760 Stb-Total Debt Retir t 46,71D 45,885 45,060 TOTAL FTIMM 11,789,733 12,152,885 15,607,060 The Oaanty.Ts presenti inpaud- in mnnectian vath a d,��te = assessed valuation. Tars ivamded as of Jute 30th anpant to $5,108. OOLUN SANTIARIQ4 DISMCr N). 5 ffiID 6/10/85 OEP R�ID9TIQYS Revised 6/19/85 1985-86 FISH, YMR FM 45 OPFY41TD4G APPROM APPRxkD AMM REXHWIIFD DE MUP= OR A03XW TPIIE BIDGEI' mncrr ETMITLAW BMW 1983-84 1964-85 1984-85 1985-86 OPE9{l4NG Director's Fees 3,500 5,000 3,818 5,000 Oontractral Services Stare of Joint Operating 1,052,000 1,359,000 1,074,439 1,387,000 Tank Maintewce 63,000 100,000 80,155 100,000 Mandole Lire & Wet Well Repairs 50,000 45,100 PuV Station Maintenance 7B0,000 180,000 195,US 200,000 pp��mtttt5 Ird. W;a�t� Ad, 25,000 25,000 17,125 20,000 Cavect�m Fee PiNn. 6,800 7,000 24,167 19,000 Bond Collection Expense 100 100 12 100 Tax ODllectim E,pese 6,000 4,900 3,928 4,900 Treasurer's Investment Ain. & Banking Fees 2,900 4,000 5,868 61000 Utilities 120,000 120,000 76,519 98,000 Professional Services 5,000 5,000 7,376 10,000 Printing and Abliontim 1,500 1,250 409 1,250 Travel & Mtg. - Directors 250 250 250 U oolnectante Accounts 11500 1,500 1,500 1OlAL 1,517,550 1,813,000 1,534,044 1,853,000 1LN-PERPMM Interest 10,000 1B4O00 28,719 23,000 Expenses Applicable to Prior Years 61000 2,000 3,040 3,000 7DM NN-CEEFATIM 16,000 20,000 31,759 26,000 1OIAL OPERATING & NN-0PFFIrT= 1,533,550 1,BB3,000 1,565,803 1,879,000 RESERVES Appropriation for Oontirgemie 3D6,700 367,000 1,059,000 Authorized General Reserve 766,800 916,000 940,000 TOM RFSERES 1,073,500 1,2B3,000 11999,000 SUB-'lO1AL R07MMIEN15 2,607,050 3,116,000 3,878,000 TFAIMMS Transfer to AN P d 337,050 SB-T09AL TPANS MS 337,050 TOML FS2jnmmqm 2,944,100 3,116,000 1,565,903 3,878,000 C3MUY SKiT1A14CN D19MCr NO. 5 PPaaggee 2 BSD(£P R833 IIZ AIYCRB 6/10/85 Revised 6/19/85 1985-86 FISM YFAR FUND 45 CB3PAT1N0 APPRDVM APPA7JID AMAL 1 DESMPOW CR A=M THE BUDMT EKM E»TuEzEss MD , 1983-84 1984-85 N84-85 1985-86 Cash 6 Irn be tS (App�opciatsl R?ser�cs and Carr-y-OA ) 1,444,600 1,243,000 1,31.5,238 1,781,000 Fees 30,000 61,000 21,435 24,000 SgVlm tal Usrt Fees 264,000 196,935 128,000 Interest 6 Mis Rs ipts 108,300 114,000 188,137 189,000 Del.iWnt Taxes 41,200 54,000 50,601 55,000 S(B-RV1N, 179,%0 493,000 457,108 396,000 Tax All aUm 1,270,000 1,335,000 1,550,364 1,674,000 sdl tiros 50,000 45,000 24,540 27,000 SfB-7UTA1. 1,320,000 1,380,000 1,574,904 1,701,000 TOM AMU ABM FMUM 2,944,100 3,116,000 3,347,250 3,878,000 OYM SAARR°'n'rCN DISMCP NO. 5 page 1 BUDEr R@324INDMCNS 6/10/85 Revised 6/19/85 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR Revised 6/24/85 FUID R5 AOAMXAM) CAPTiAL a7mm ESrn4=D AP18U/ED APPP04ED ACIML RMIZE IIFID DES=PIICN OR AaSAPli' =E F rID . n= E70?FhIDI1Ulg.5 BL= 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 PR]7IX'L4 NND EHIFSIDI7U]>ES Treatment Plant Expansion 2,652,000 2,242,000 940,439 11610,000 Appropriation for Master- Planned 'Treatment Plant Fac 1,281,983 2,298,000 1,371,000 Radio Linked Telemetry System 60,000 50,000 50,000 Flow Analysis & Metering 35,000 35,000 35,000 Rehabilitate & ReLxate PCH Sewer from Bay Bridge Station to GUxr Dr (5-18R) 782,000 (16,772) Bay Bridge Pimp Station nts 400,000 477,000 500,000 Slip Lira Coast Hwy Force Main Rocky Pt P/S to D. r Dr 500,000 650,000 650,000 Rehabilitate Lids Force Main & PCH Force Main, Lida F.M. to Valve "B" (5-26) 500,000 635,000 40,154 650,000 "A" St., 14th St. attl Lida Pump Station Liprovantnts 224,000 200,000 Increased Electrical Service at Lida P/S 12,514 Modify FM at Bitter Point 24,000 Coast Trunk Force Mains: 800,000 1,601,000 1. S.A. River bo Bitter Point pump Station - Phase I (5-79-R1,A) 196,539 - Phase II (5-19-R2) 32,096 468,000 2. Bitter Point P/S to Newport Blvd. 5-19-R3 950,000 3. S.A. River to Rocky Point 2,250,000 Replace Portions of Bayside Drive Sewer 1,629,000 Iatabilitate Balboa Peninsula Trunk, Lido P/S to 'G" St. (3Xa) 1,300,000 Bally Peninsula Study "A" St. to %" St. 3,445 Master Plan Update 903 Slide Gate Installation 5 & 6 110,000 49,490 A & B Trunk Mal Flay .toter 4,634 Joint [asks Equity Purchase 22,000 235,000 Eardgmke/Flmd Damage Reserve 52,000 Alpm riation for District Facilities Inpro a ents and Expansion 775,000 350,000 926 350,000 1C'LgL l+32J1Rt842IL4 81938.983 8,694,000 1,269,368 10,671,000 OXWN SMTlAATICN DIS1RICf ND. 5 BuDmr Tj� 66/y ', 2 Revised 6/19/85 1985-86 FISM YEAR Revised 6/24/85 EM $5 ALL'UFf LAME) CAPTIAL CUMM ES1TNUM APPROMD APPRIM AMM E032 4mm DESCEMMC I OR A037R4T TIUE RLDW E00I£f EXP34DrMittS EU� 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 AVAUAELE RM= Cash 6 Imesh,ennts (AEpropriated Reserves and Carry-O+er) 6,903,933 7,020,000 6,968,709 6,996,000 Federal and State Grants 314,000 421,000 187 327,000 Sale of Joint Works Equity 42,000 Flc, -Sased Equity Adjustment 1,818,000 Sale of Capacity Riots 203,000 27,000 24,648 280,000 Fees 621,000 25,000 4,178 5,000 Supplemental User Fees 604,000 459,515 626,000 Interest 6 Misc. Receipts 518,000 597,000 815,585 629,000 SLE-TU 4. 1,698,000 1,674,000 1,304,113 3,685,000 Transfer from operating Fund 337,050 RUML AVAUABLE. FM= 8,938,983 8,694,000 81272,822 10,671,000 CYIM s,b=TT@3 DISmCT ND. 5 6/10/85 I BErMT RM40CMCN5 revised 6/19/85 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR FM R5 FAMMIES MMVM APPROM) APPFOM ACITAL 103:b� CESSaUMC4 OR AOMW T= BDCEE BLUMT E%PMlTfRM BUDMT 1983-.84 19B4-85 1984-85 1985-86 PFi]JBM AND F70•MITMS Paimbur Rent Agreements Payatte 7,650 79,000 20,085 270,000 Arpropriation for District Facilities DI¢nmvenents and EXtensiQs FLtse Fainturserent Agreercirt Payments 189,340 218,000 743,000 Tn;L rowuomm 196,990 2971000 20,085 1,013,000 AVAIIABFE MUM Cash 6 InvesGrents (AEprcpriated reserves Carry-Over) 4 58,990 149,000 149,185 629,000 Correction Foes 130,000 130,000 483,342 371,000 Interest Inwne 81000 18,000 15,830 13,000 SIB TOM 138,000 148,000 499,172 384,000 TOM AVAU.ME. FR4 M ]%,990 297,000 648,357 1,013,000 *Cutstanding Agreements: ry ym Irvine Co. $109,689 - Fomnnec fees do ro Drive ot wrtrt'�nce until at Bayside Drive Trek ist fran Irvire (b. 364,044 meted to tine southerly city bozKlary (estinatad after 1988) Clam 32,421 - For Back Bay Trunk Sewer OM Peters 226,942 T p N .�O O7[R71Y SANrPMC7 DIS1RECr W. 5 6/10/85 BlDZr RBZb�CEI9 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR FOED $5 BCM L P71IIhSr - 1951 APPROEM APPROVED Acilm R032441M DE CRIMCN CR PQDOM THE HID= BUD= EI4tId rI RE.S BO7(£P 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 BOD =RReM AND MMEST Primilal m Binds 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Intecest m Binds 4,565 4,015 3,785 3,465 TOTAL 24,565 24,015 23,785 23,465 AUTHMI2FD GDEML IESME 22,145 21,970 21,595 TOAL R07JUMMM 46,710 45,885 45,060 LESS: MAILABEE F[14BU Cash 6 I+ trrmts klmopriated Peser 6 Carry-Over) 23,767 25,090 23,496 24,300 DaUngo.,t Tams 885 Interest a Misr. Receipts 2,000 2,500 1,255 3,000 SLB-TOOL 2,000 2,500 2,140 3,000 AMDNP TO BE RAISED BY MUM 20,943 18,295 22,450 17,760 TOTAL AMULA an FUZ= 46,710 45,885 48,086 45,060 Outstanding G.O. Binds @ 6/30/85: $156,000 Fiuel Paym t Irate: August, 1990 i/10/83 AvisW 6/11/SS Gm[BY SaA1B1"SN mBIIQC{'�D. 5 9]EIIJw¢•oi3LeCe musaw smx+P.z13sa mj. 1tta1 CLe. 1985-06 19B6-s/ 1981-30 190&-29 198490 �l 1 L9 2 Radio GiNm61!'aec-1 sya (a) SD,am SO.a00 Plan N yaiS a-m lira (al 35.m0 35,m0 W t laak Pao!ma : (3) 1. SA. ai ec m mte W Mp S atim 41 - Pam M LJS-66• SWI000 3Lm0 A66,m0 2. 9it� a i Paq Sta m�c 31W. (al• W' m 2m,m0 ]00,000 3. Sm2,va 3itec m a>*y Point (al• 2,M,000 250,m0 1,Om,mO I,Om.mO atltabilitate Lim. a4 Yein stl!al FU[m (2) (Lim P.Y. m VaLte 'B') RI (al• 6501m0 mD,Om SO,mO LiA Zzx tMLt S-26 4550,mm VIM a 'M •A" St., 1/C,St., aC Lida P V Smt3 its (3) (al m0,m0 WIM ]m,lOO W'mO [Nabilitata Rollie Pmlm w S 1Y !Jm Pap slatlm G Kmt (3) lal LmB4Om 900,am Sm.mO mO,Om SUP lire Q SC Ny. Slim Sa:n, q ky K. P/S m RPaer Gtae PI (a) SSB,pm 650,em BW Brid3s Ps Smoot immtEante (a) Sm,mO W'M MIM Bay�ds @Ste 1 k Saar Otlec 5 11 Pmjs (a) - 250.m0 •A,mO m.Om 501m SO.mO SO,Om SO.Om SO.ltlO SWhW DLD F1rtl 5.985,m0 n,m0 2,a13.00G 2.p50.000 LsaB.Om 1,Bm.Om 1,m0.Om 901m0 SD.mO BWm&uci.2 k Seac,O) LSB6,m0 14m6,6m lal Ca S . PR 6 Bmaisim (3) of City Sa er m Stam Park (a) 4m,m0 MIM EElnmaim of Rase'1t,ak. (3) P5/s ac P/B m C<Y'xal 650.a00 65J,000 Crystal Cne PsP St tiat (3)(a) 350,m0 =I= � a SwN Ras[ (3) 2l+ak h®Crystal C PPS m S th Cast Raiel�t (al 3)O,mO m 'M Ytamllan®ue Pmjsts hl mmo 251Pm 2S,m0 25.am 25,M 25,m0 271M a.mG S�m Part 3.215 = 3.Om 25,m0 LS2S,m0 25,m0 1.a25,M 225,m0 251m0 amen 1RmL n 260,M n,= 2.33B.m0 2.M M 3.m5,m0 1.825,m0 2.(]S.mO Zfi,mO S,mO I,,H ly Paid by mstcict 6 fal Addy Flrikd IH Pa<nally flr�ds9 (c) Nrt e(rdad - L f mtim P�rvettiyy uidar dsd, & lgeEso PLa C illti® aindile0 6a Cuti¢e deslwmmtcmtim 6/la/BS MVMY SANITATION AIL"o lT W. I RevleH VIV.3 9T TEAR OP 'NAD91-06 T.G ear. PLO- MvlaH b/19/BS PI9CN. TEARS {985-86 TNROWN 1989-90 Can OtlCRIME 19B5-B6 -B) 1987-ee 1109-69 9-90 S-yta[ Tou[ (NARRATING PWO 1 RHmtH6 6 Ce[[ybvt[ I.Use Yam[ 11701,000 1.9991000 2.3H,000 2.443,000 5,691.000 1.781 000 NEW ] $MI. O6 It Tam AllwatlM 11156,000 110961000 I,H0,000 313I1,000 2,369,000 10,301,400 J PHm 153,000 3)].000 I16 r 00a 39a.a00 199r 000 ],339,aa0 1 lntH6K 6 MLaeallpnaaH Imap Teal000 ]10.000 ]]].000 136.000 loll00. 1,110.00a 5 OHO, "..a 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 'NHd RCRMUR 1.097,000 21370,... ].696 000 3,018 000 3.471,000 _13,706,004 1 TOTAL AVA[IANE PVbDIXO 3.078.O0 4,I77,000 1.905.000 5,199.000 6.160.000 15,491,000 R>PLNO[TaRR3 0 Stara 00 Joint W M 11 6 0 1,3tl,090 1p95:000 l,B3ba00 2,101,000 ]14]61000 913S1,00a 9 Col.I—Ilon Bye tam N 6 0 ud ONe[ name. 49],a00 31].000 630.000 61310.0 762,000 3.I50,000 10 OLD., BvgHLI.... 0 0 9 0 0 0 it fOW. eNP8N01TUR® 1,071,000 2,110,000 1.I14.00, 2,402,000 3.IB81000 12,501,00, li Maa[wa 6 C-111 a[ W Neat year 11999,000 1,3a9.a00 2,161,000 1,197,000 2,180,000 2,990,000 13 Mt YH['a 0[y Period PYndly Requlrommts 910.000 1,084,000 1,132,000 11401,000 11594,000 l,f9b 000 11 Tend "terms 01 IMt1011) 1.059,000 1.l25.000 1,209,000 1.396.000 3.386.000 I.106 000 WITAL PO[m[91 15 R....so. A Cauy-0ve[ 9[m Last Yas[ 1.615.000 1.131.000 1.631,000 2,165,000 703,000 7.615.000 RCBMIR L6 COiutr.Lt. OHnt6 327,000 15,000 2,000 16r000 16ba00 524,000 Il Tou Cm ..I— 311,000 3)1.000 433.000 1,135,000 166,000 3,271,000 10 ONe[ 6+1,000 12810.0 619,000 Gallo.. 571,000 3105a1000 19 Sale 0T Meet" Giants 280,000 50,000 59.060 696.000 1,283,000 30 Inte[e.t 6 Nlstmilansoua IncomeN5,000 $16,000 370,000 I67A00 0 1,796a00 3l Pl=..d Rgulty ad3ement l,el91010 11910,000 U ONet I.. 0 0 11900,000 110,000 1.100.000 S.a S,.000 21 NGL R832MR 110)3.000 1,650,000 3,391,000 2,921,no 31103.000 1S.197,000 2a {GAL .1 WIE TV101N0 11,687,000 4,704,000 8,012,000 5.916,000 11n86.000 21,8U.000 c"MIITIARE9 i5 9M[e o6 Joint W[ts Tree meant It met 116101H0 2,027,000 119111000 2.105r000 2,007,000 10,090,000 36 Olat[let Callwtlon System 2,419,000 2,975.000 31025,000 1,825,000 2.175,000 11.036.000 I) MW L ,[Hmwt A9uaewt Ppyante 370,000 61,000 1111000 603,008 723,000 2,oH,000 19 elm-MHd equ lty AdlHmxnt a 0 0 0 0 0 19 ONs[ ergndltum 235,000 0 0 0 0 23S,000 30 TRIAL WC .Tx 11553,000 4a41.000 5,067,000 5,113,000 5,395,009 24,211,000 31 "Across 6 Cerr3Wvar m Next Year ).U1.000 bal.000 2.DS ON 193.000 (1,399,0001 (113,91000) SWD PRD5S1 12 Mna[vee 6 CHsyOve[ P[u Laos Ywl 21.000 21,000 26,000 38.000 37.000 21,000 MlRDHUB 33 Tsa Levy 22,000 21,000 2L,000 MARS 13,900 110,000 11 rnu[p.t A N1...11 two InwOa 2,000 3,000 31000 3,000 31000 11,000 I5 Ome[ ImoH 0 a a 0 a 0 36 TOTN. AeVENue 21.000 21.000 21,.0. 16.000 26,009 124,00, 37 TOTK AVAIWrd TRADING 40,No 19.000 58,000 54,000 $3,000 110.000 RAP6.w ITMtl 11 Meet NOMINAL A m"na 23,000 23,000 22,000 27,000 ]),000 122,000 19 Games NOHdLmns, 0 0 a a 0 0 10 'NC.L WLHDIM1YR¢/ 23,000 23.000 22.000 27.000 27,000 122,000 II pHe["a A "Cry-Ow[ W Meat YH[ 25,000 26,000 28,000 27,000 26,000 21.000 82 Mert Yea's Dry ParIRA PwdIRS Reyuirasents ISMS 26,000 28,000 27,000 21,000 26.O40 U Ford MIHc. or 1"yltltl 0 0 0 0 0 0 S.V 1Ad3UtAd far In"[-Pwd TraH[wq 41 MAcrws 6 Cas[ybw[ Free Last YH[ 9,420,000 9115010.0 1.4561000 $ra H.000 3.507,000 1,420,000 15 YNAL RBVRNa 6.193,990 4,052,000 4,1111000 6.069,OH 61600,00, 29.811.000 11 NT1i AVAIGSLR ADDING 1S16131000 I1,210r000 12,967,00. 1b.911M 10,107,000 38r111.00a 11 lOTY. ."orTNIH 1,455,000 "Wm, 7,533,000 7.992,000 8,50O.OSO 36,434,000 1e me.I.A A CHsyOVG, W Not Ta.. 9,158.000 6.551,000 $1,34,000 3,507,000 11607,000 11607,900 89 Meet SAM'. osy I.Iicd Funding MOUIrHAnte 965.000 11110,000 WARMS 1,422,000 1.620.000 L,620.000 5r NID M OR 5001CIT1 $1191,000 5J16.00. bV1.000 ].0)9.000 913.0001 23 s00 UHEIA -IdOSI-� 9861 - 9861 SNOIiVaN3VMOODH i�ioon8 O m c� �OIS'61-•� AiNnoo DJNVJO -� O 9 ' Oil 1SIa1Sla 11011d11NVS A1Nnoo COUNTY SANITATION DL'^RICT M. 6 6/10/81 BLDET RE3:M Z,,'UIONS Revised 6/17/85 1985-86 FISCAL )MR SUIWRY _ DFSC'IPiIO1 OR ACC.IRNP TIME BUMET BUDGET HLJ GET I:A3-P4 1984-85 1985-86 RS'I1IMMU115 Operating & Capital Requirenmts Operating FVd 2,176,2G0 2,663,000 4,077,000 Ar ilated Capital Outlay Fund 3,973,985 3,590,000 4,386,000 Facilities Revolving Eu d 365,533 402,000 1,054,000 SLB-TOTAL OPERATING & CAPTML 6,515,718 6,655,000 9,517,000 Debt Retire nt Eaand aml Interest Fund - 1951 55,866 69,648 70,266 101AL 171)XUBIIRM 6,571,584 6,T-'4,648 9,587,266 FUNDING Operating & Capital Funding Cash & Lwestnmts (Appropriated Reserves and Carry-Over) 3,817,718 4,106,000 5,827,000 Otnwr Revenue 1,908,000 1,729,000 2,874,000 Anticippasted Tax Allmatim Fran 18 Lwy 790,000 820,000 1,416,000 SLU-TOJAL OPERA"TNG & CD211PL 6,515,718 6,655,000 91517,000 Debt Fetire�t Cash & Investments (AFpmpriated Reserves & Carryover) 34,950 27,842 40,266 Other Revenue 4,000 3,000 4,000 Mcant Raised by Taxes for Debt Obligatim 16,916 38,806 26,000 SM'1C77fAI. DEEP R;,� 55,866 69,648 70,266 101AL RMING 6,571,584 6,724,648 9,587,266 Tte sty is presently fives ding taxes in ox tim with a dispute wer assessed valuatim. Taxes irVourr'2d as of Sure 30th a t to $3,234. DISTRICT WUN1YBDGET RR C 10MAM S[JJ. 6 6/ln/85 Revised 6/19/85 1985-86 FI'Ol, '--AR POID #6 OPEMFMG APPS= APPADVM ACIM EE7•MENMD DMMPLLO4 CR A=%T THE BUX TT BUM -' MIEDIDITLM Bui m 1983-84 1984--3 1934-85 1985-86 Director's Fees 3,500 4,500 4,180 4,500 CmtractL 1 SeC aims Stare or Joint Operating 1,146,000 1,550,000 1,145,9:6 1,400,000 T'nnk Maintenance 25,000 25,000 5,376 15,000 Manhole Lire 8 Wet We11 Repairs 18,900 Pump Station Maintenance 20,000 24,500 9,284 15,000 Permit 6 Im. Waste Adm 50,000 25,r00 21,475 25,000 Ca tim Fee Ad=. 91000 3,500 19,149 17,000 Band Collection Eu@� 100 100 8 100 Tax Collection D¢nayse 4,050 3,900 3,816 3,900 Treasurer's Iawsbn t Adm 6 Banking Fees 1,300 3,000 2,912 4,000 Utilities 11,000 11,000 10,091 11,000 Special Fxperre 10,000 10,000 10,000 Professional Seevio`s 2,000 2,000 2,000 Printing and PAblimtim 11500 3,250 30 3,250 Travel 6 Mtg. - Directors 250 250 81 250 Unto l.ectable Aco7,mts 2,000 1,000 11000 TOM OFEPATTZ 1,304,600 1,667,000 1,222,338 1,522,000 WI4-0PEPATING Interest 2,600 4,000 3,998 ENpenses Applicable ro Prior Years 70,000 3,000 3,000 TOTAL. W-1-0HItATM 72,600 7,000 3,000 3,000 TOML OPERATING 5 Nu+<vEPAITMG 1,377,200 1,674,000 1,226,336 1,525,000 IESERM A Prepriatim for --ontingencie 110,400 152,000 1,789,000 Autinrized General F�rve 688,600 837,000 763,000 TOM FORRVES 799,000 989,000 2,552,000 Transfer to Baid nNO 1,800 TOML Ra2imRhIIN15 2,176,200 2,663,000 1,222, 338 L4,077,000 (a87Ti .ANMUTM DI.M%= PD. 6 PPa�l�ee 2 GLUM Pa)*Sg MCNS �� �/85 1985-86 F7SM YEAR FLM 66 C6EFATRC lorLTMO APPR7M APPI'UGD ACAX RE32":m DFSCRiPrMN CR AOUJtRIT TIUZ F(XXM HL.S.T EKifr lrfflw BLIG2 _ 1i83-84 UN-95 L84 85 1985-86 A'AIIABIE EUUD G Cash s lmsshnents (Appropriat, 3 Reserves ard Carr, 0veL) 386,200 860,000 929,132 2,242,000 Fees 903,000 72,000 129OU 147,000 Sgmle�tal User Fees 787,000 924,702 38,000 Interest s Misc. Receipts 36,000 92,000 144,536 146,000 Delincgent Taxes 26,000 32,000 31,033 33,000 DE Fran Qceta Mesa Sanitary District 35,000 S[B-TU&L 1,000,000 983,000 1,229,624 414,000 Tsx Allocation 760,000 . 790,000 1,290,656 1,393,000 suf tics 30,000 30,000 20,550 23,000 SUB-TOML 790,000 820,000 1,311,206 11416,000 Tom AUAIIAB[E mom 2,176,200 2,663,000 3,469,962 4,077,000 Revised 6/19/85 1385-86 FILL YEAR FUND 'r6_F'AId:_MED(A ML aMAY ESSTRVIB0 APP-'a1ED .PP!04FD ACTLAL rsl"Elm) 11ESCtIEMN Qt ACDMM =8 i.DDMT HNM xM3BSLAFS .s7IX2•;T _ 1983-84 198445 Lce"5 1985-86 PRC-E= PRD 1ITENDrIXRM Tceatmart Plant HPFansim 2,334,000 1,984,000 827,812 1,626,000 Appcoprcaticn far Master- Plaired Treatment Facilities 597,520 644,000 765,000 Slip Lire Coast ywl EM - NM=t Blvd ho Platt No. 2 450,000 534,000 Radio Linked ledinatry System 10,000 10,00u 10,000 Modify EM at Bitter Point 3,000 Coast Trunk Ebr Mains: 1. S.A. River bo Bitter Point pip Btation PF,aae I (5-19-01,A) n,620 Pbase II (5-19-R2) 1,904 133,000 2. Bitter Point Pulp Station by Re t Blvd. 315,000 3. Santa Are River bn Rocky Point Master Plat L'pda: 1,122 Flaw Analysis & Metering 25,000 25,000 25,000 Airtese ank.A68 Trunk Mag Floareter 66,914 Retabilitate Lido PM and PCH FM (Lida EM to Vale W)* 25,000 45,000 50,000 Slide Gate Installation 5 & 6 40,000 17,871 FlooSased Bluity Adjushn:nt 1,235,000 Joint Works Bluity Purclnare 85,000 133,000 133,000 Fa ftjak%Mcod Danage Reserve 52,000 Iffiatim for District Facilities Iaprwatants aryl Exbansikns 444,465 175,000 175,000 TOIAL Rawneffim 3,973,985 3,590,000 1,060,243 4,386,000 CaR CT NO. BBL £F �C?S 6 6/lu/85 Revised 6/19/85 1985-86 FI9:AL YEAR FUM % IIIIMATED CAPIML QAIAY x1prom APPR71ED 9% p7 RQA D D7S3IPCN CR ALIN 1SOIE r BLIX—I EF7 : S LEGET 1%3-P4 ]984-85 196 4-85 ]985-66_ WMABdE F IMING Cash & Inveshmits (Appropriated Reset es and Carry,)vw) 3,250,985 2,947,000 2,947,390 2,297,000 Joint Forks Equity Sale 282,000 Federal and State Grants 277,000 372,000 164 330,000 Sale of Capscit Rights 179,000 25,000 21,697 247,000 Fees 23,000 55,000 62,255 71,000 Stpplenental User Fees 938,M0 Interest & Misc. Rsaipts 244,000 191,000 325,335 221,000 SUB-TOIA. 723,000 643,000 4C9,451 2,089,000 10L5L AVAILamr. F[MDG 3,973,985 3,590,000 3,356,841 9,386,C00 cam SANT"1=(N DlEmcr M. 6 6/lA/85 SLEGE''T FS-. .MafYMCNS 1985-36 Fi:3:N. WR F[PD U6 1'ACQ.IITF" Tomm i:31TRI'Q17 APPR7.S9 APPrOM9mCVr Flmm FDZXICtmD UMM DESCRIFLTQV Q2 ACIDO[7P Tf'IIE HJD-8T 084-85 E7ti 1984-U 815-8f 1'.�03-84 1954-85 1984-',S 19R5-86 FId13D.3'a * F:TFDDITUFM Fairview SLb-"Ymk Relief 240,000 717 Fairview Gisler Truck 29,310 25,000 Appr7iaticn for District FaCi_ities vq=ve�ts d Etensias 125,533 402,000 1,029,000 TOML fufRitIIlum 365,533 402,000 30,027 1,054,000 AvnnaRra FMDZr! Cash & Investnmt5 (A&pcopriated Rescrves & Carry-Over) 180,533 299,000 298,675 688,000 Ca¢cetim Fees 171,000 70,000 382,980 331,000 Interest Imam 14,000 33,000 36,307 35,000 SLE-TOM 185,000 103,010 419,287 366,000 TOM AtmnawF. F(A = 365,533 402,000 717,962 1,059,000 Q7(m SMMT(CN DISTRICT In. 6 6/10/85 BU)Mr R83144301aiONS 1985-36 FISAL YEAR ECT 66 B:?D & DMEMT - r51 _ - AP_:MM APPFL M ALKK, FBI DESMPPIC.; OR ACML If MUE BLUCM EU= E'O.iSDI1_'M BO7C,:P 1983-84 1984-85 7984-^5 1985-86 MM IMR94M ACID W EEk" Primipal m Bads 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 Interest on Baids 4,046 3,234 2,894 2,340 TOM 29,046 28,234 27,894 :2,3 0 AODmzED Ca� FEMF E 26,820 41,414 37,926 TO1AL FSWnM4ENM 55,866 69,648 7D,266 IEW: AVAnAMR AM= { Cash & Irn bs is (Appropriated deser4 s & CCcry-ove ) 34,950 27,842 28,U9 40,256 Delinquent Taxes 11000 1,50C 1,315 2,000 interest & Misc. Pernipts 3,000 1,5D0 1,356 2,000 SCB-TOIAI, 4,000 3,000 2,671 41000 AMXVr TO SE RAISED BY MUM 16,916 38,BO6 35,569 26,000 Transfer fm Operating Furd 1,800 TOM AVAIIABIE FIWIW. 55,866 69,648 68,159 70,266 Outsta:dirg G.O. Pods @ 6/30/85: $87,000 Dam of Fiml Palmait: August, 1987 9wlaad 6/iL89 9MIY YNl'Al2Qi 0IS^_HCT:D. 5 :;.:v0]8E CF D[91AICT Q.:'R`LIW Sd31.3A F0WPC9 r.! 1bta1 C.I.P. 1%}% l%"7 )F37-% L%e-% La m 19 1 INI-92 Pdb Ltnlvl O'alertry (a) M,WO 10,000 r1l.kvlyaia b M Wim (a) E,WO E,WO Croat 3- k Fmx tale: (3 1. S.F. Mwc b 9itmr Po1. a 9lattm 1 II: J985-%• 135,Q00 2,000 133,OW 2. Sieber toJat pap 5®li. m,w.¢te 9lW. lal• 315,Wo W,W0 232,W0 3. Snwj, (,)Riwr m Rxky 7W,WO 100,Wo mo,000 300,W0 PMabllltrn Lids Faro,a eM [CH Pam Yale (61d7 F.M. m valw "S•) (2) W. 50,000 %,WO F.1am11awma (b) 175,000 25,000 E,Wo E,Wo 25,000 E,Wo E,WO 25,000 9dsM1Gte1 AW Plyd 1,432,OW 2.W0 736.W0 E],WO 1]S.WO 329,W0 3E WO E.WO s_ Fafrvia Gisler lMk (W. 6,Oo1,W0 29,W0 E,OW 3,550,.00 213001W0 Mlem]lmewa Pmjwm (b) 175,Wn E,Wo 25,000 E,WO E,wo 25,000 25.000 25,000 6LLt-M1blal 211 FVd 6.U9.W0 29,CW W.WO 25,000 E.000 E.OW E,WO 3,675,000 2,JE.WO 05q`D'tOAL 7,611,W0 31,W0 376,000 M2,WO 150.O00 SOW 350.M 1,7W.000 2,MO.000 (a7 n,:+y Ndtl 1. mmwr-plm . G:ilittaa p�emRty:rhr mrotc�elm (bwaa ly FV Wd 2. W wr-pjn ccuitio pP�eanely utlac design (a) P Rrde! 3. Weur PL..rd Emllieiea s.'�tei P¢ Nhua daei9Nmeavctkn II • Poctially Poll by DuUic 5 V10A5 fsanff SlV tTATIOM oISMICP W. 6 pev laeM 6/ll/BS Stt5II2YC OP PKV . L . P Revised 6/19/25 PISCK 'In 19e5-86 Tl. 1909-1. LI9¢ OnCR1P1IeM 1985-86 19e6-81 1982b0 1988-89 1969-90 5-Tear ""t ontaxVVG PRR I neae[vea t Carry-Over rono Oat Tnr 2,242,000 2,553.a00 2.225.000 2.90.060 MOO, 2,242,000 1 4 2 Snare um of It Tax Alletl 1,[89.000 1.565.000 11,90,000 11835.000 1.171.000 9.500.000 ] Paaa 142,00a 169.00a 199.000 230.000 252,008 981.000 [ lauuar [ MSaotlaneoua items. 231,000 266,000 283.000 290'.. 202,000 113611000 S otte.t nor.. 0 0 0 a 0 0 6 It2GtL OM.not 11835,m 21000,we 2,111,000 2.33S,M .1",,Goo l0.e42.00o 2 NU.L lo"t"a"M PNOtYG 6.022.000 6.553.000 4.941,NO S.240.000 5.414,000 134e11O0 RII9IDITORC9 8 Sxam of joint aorta M f O 11100.000 1.610.000 IJ53,000 2,00.000 2,426,000 91119.000 9 Collntim Syatee x [ O and O[Aer 06ep 1251000 301000 194,000 M21000 222,000 100,000 IO Otoor Ex itures 0 0 a 0 0 0 21 109.E eiF_[SotTIdG9 1.52SAOa 1.n2.000 2,036,000 2,312,000 2.646,000 10,318,000 12 Reae[ree 6 Carryover m tl... Tn[ 2,S52,006 2.775,000 2,905,000 2.906.000 2.766,000 2.716.000 13 Yet Yur'a ... 9e[lod P-.I" Rgoi[xxoota 713,000 gallant 1,018,000 1.166.000 1J34.000 1,314,000 13 PW Satazt Or i0e[St6U 1.209.000 11896,000 Le92.000 1.142,000 11,121", 11t12.00 CnlI P0mI51 15 .Lae[wa [ cxx"y re[ arm fast Tu[ 2.9e5,00, 2,306.000 11664,000 1,622,000 1.35L000 2.905.0O0 REVdUC 16 Cmst[mt(m G[anta 330,000 16.000 31000 15.000 162.000 530.000 `J Pna: Coo.im 331,000 492,000 73,1000 375,000 258.000 2,192,000 t8 OtM[ 11001.000 1,042,000 1.090,000 1.134.000 1.124.000 5.663.000 19 Sale Of C.'fity RI900a 30,000 14.000 S2,000 H1.Oo0 1.114.406 20 [nn[ut 1 !t1..11an . 1. 259.000 113,000 161.000 143.000 .6,000 64S.000 11 PIO.^ysed Equity Adjustment 0 0 0 0 0 0 2_ Moo, 1. 292,000 0 0 0 0 202,000 _- TIgL eEVgpB 2.450,000 1.2e2,NO 2,038,000 2.Ise,000 I.68s.no 10,426,000 24 ..l.nes e90[Ya 5.413.00a 3.993.000 3762,000 4,080,000 2,131,000 13.e11,000 eysatm[TPL�s as n4ce O2 Join Yo[b T[eaWnt Pint 1,626,000 S10421000 1.930.000 2.09.000 2.106,000 10,1901.00 26 05at[tct cellottcm Syatra 376.000 M3.000 150.a00 31.1000 350.000 1.508.000 12 hlmWueaent A9reennt Payments 0 0 0 0 0 0 aPlev-Oaamd C ix'AdjuaWnt 1,235,OW 1.225,000 35 Oteo, eWendtturea 0 o a 0 0 0 St PLL eiaCCixtil6 3.232.004 2.319.000 2.080.000 1.629.000 1.08.000 12.933,000 31 en.- [ carry Over t0 Y... Tm[ 2.2o6.a00 1.666000 1.621.000 1 211.000 63e.000 [28.000 Baia F'ext 551 32 Rtasvo [ Ca[" ' Rm 4.x Yn[ 60,000 18.000 Z1,p00 6 a 40,000 RVEIRME 31 Tas [svy 261000 12100 0 0 a U.OW 3a Innnsc [ xlaaltaneou. 1- .10.0 31000 0 0 o T,00o 35 O\er mIDcaee 0 0 0 a a o 36 xx L RCrC20P 30.00 Mean a 0 0 50,000 33 TOPE AMIfA.. euIID..G 20.000 S6.000 27,00 0 0 Wow easM- tT00.2% 3e extol Ptinclwl [ cneerot 32,000 3100a 22,000 0 0 10,000 31 Otte.[ e.'emat'ute. 0 a a 0 a 0 40 19PL asacrolTuw 32,000 31,000 27,000 0 a Mine 21 ]fetus. . Caxry -O t0'next Y.- 38.0.0 22,000 a 0 0 O 12 Anc Tn[v 0ty aeum Potl5n9 R.Wlrenntn 30.00 21,000 0 0 a e U Pwd .1. ox (q[Itiq 0 0 0 O a 0 e4_RY (Adjusted [O. InnvPUW 1,.-f.t.1 l4 14aexves , carryon. P.m Last Yn. 5.262.000 5.196.000 .1111.000 4,531.000 4.159.000 5,267,000 4 =OTAL IL^2C4P 4,323,000 31807,000 111.11M 5.193,000 4.111,one 21 310.000 16 . AV .. xAalM 9.59o,000 01603.000 6.670,000 9,320,0&0 6,350.000 26.5a5.000 42 IOL L eRPOt. 4,394,000 4.137... 4,143,000 5.1611000 5.106.000 23,341,000 10 enan... . Cu[yO.e[ to Ye.t Y., 41296.000 4.461.000 4.527,000 4.I59.000 3,244,00 3,144.000 4 M..t Y...•. ocy Ftlud aWtq ee0oi[emeeta 801,000 916,00 1,018,000 1,161,000 1,324,000 1,324,000 50 N1® 965AVCC OR Wict"I 3,195.000 3.550.aa0 3 5509.000 2,113,000 1.920.00n I.920.000 HVDA -WOSL. 926 L -926 G SNOIl`d4N3NNO0EIa ia)cinB O m _ o F C v r � kox�Sti AiNnoo EIJNVHO AO L ' ON i0IHISla NOIldlINVS AiNnoo O3UWY SANTTP0.TO4 DISMICP NO. 7 6/10/85 BUDGET R9014 NUATIaz Revised 6/19/85 Revised 6/23/85 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR S244W DESCR=ON OR A03J.Nl TITII: BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 102inu m Operating 6 Coital Requir is Operating Fuld 2720,425* 3,708,000 5,567,000 en Am ,lateld Capital Outlay Find 14:746,993 12,723,000* 20,976,000 Facilities Revolving Ftrd 5,701,348 7,095,000 10,222,000 SUB 7OIAL Q£PA M S CAMAL 23,168,766 23,526,000 36,765,000 Debt Retir t Bid and Interest Fad - 1951 30,958 67,124 75,000 Bo nd and Interest Flyd - 1962 239,184 1,303,452 1,431,000 Hrnd and Interest Fad - 1970 820,871 2,011,866 1,769,000 SIB-7O1AL I&HP mum4m 1,141,013 3,382,442 3,275,000 7OML FBJMMAMIS 24,309,779 26,908,442 40,040,000 F%DING Operating 6 Capital Eliding Cash 6 IIroesbw nts (Appropriated Easerves and Carry-Over) 18,678,203 20,292,000 19,206,000 Other Revema 2,895,200* 4,002,000 15,395,000 Anticipated Tax Allocation Fran 18 Levy 1,765,000 1,860,000 2,164,000 SB-'iOIN. OFEPA@]G 6 CAPIML 23,338,403 26,154,000 36,765,000 Debt Retirement Cash 6 Investments (Appropriated Reserves 5 Carry her) 906,705 489,442 2,995,000 Other Rev n e 64,671 265,000 280,000 AnGat Raised by Tames for Debt Obligation -0- -0- -0- SB�10W. ®T IMRHIZU 971,376 754,442 3,275,000 TOLRI. E1%DII4G 24,309,779 26,908,442 40,040,000 *Adjusth3 for Inter-Fad Transfers I I The Ow my is presently' h�pardin3 taxes ar in re n wit h th a dy to over assessed valuation. Taxes rnpa dnd as of Jae 30th amm nt bn $10,128. $DGEf RE MS 7 6/P1�0e85 Revised 6/19/85 1985-86 FISM MR Revised 6/23/85 FUD #7 O[MUMNG APPFONM APPTaM AMM 180240M D6Q 111ION OR AC J= TE= BD(1':f BUDGEM EMMITU RE: BIDG�' 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 convagm Director's Fees 8,000 15,000 8,307 15,000 Contracbal SwAces Stare of Joint Operating 1,136,000 1,503,000 1,245,238 1,719,000 Txmk Mai. s,000 85,000 - 87,055 100,000 MwAmle & Line Repairs 40,800 Ptnp Statim Maintenance 95,000 151,000 100,743 140,000 Permit & Ind. Waste A&L 115,000 m,000 141,047 170,000 Camectim Fee Alain 6,5500 11,000 39,922 30,000 Inter-Dist. Sevier Use Chg. 1,800 1000 11800 1,800 Bond Colle:edm E qx n..se 100 100 24 100 Tax Cbllectim H,pense 4,400 4,500 4,441 4,600 Treasurer's Investment AOR. & Banking Fees 8,100 15,000 14,363 15,000 Utilities 75,000 75,000 54,197 651000 Pmfessimal Services 10,000 10,000 6,652 10,000 Printing and PubUcatim 1,1D0 1,500 1,336 1,500 Travel & Mtg. - Directors 750 500 423 . 500 Uroollectable Acmmts 5,000 1,400 1,305 11500 Tom OEE[WIM 1,587,650 2,005,000 1,706,853 2,274,000 N2,1 $RATIIIG - Interest 9,600 7,500 7,330 8,000 MpenSes AEpliMble to Prior Years 3,000 2,500 719 1,000 TOTAL NM+CEEFfC= 12,600 10,000 8,049 91000 TOML BRA@' 7Ci & NM-01 1,600,250 2,015,000 1,714,902 2,2B3,000 R RRMWS Appropriation fcr Omtingewie 320,050 686,000 2,142,000 Authorized General Fesene 800,125 1,700,000 1,142,000 'VIAL RIBERJES 1,120,175 1,693,000 3,294,000 93-4U7II+L RE29IiEMM 2,720,425 3,708,000 5,567,000 TRAMEER9 Transfer to Bad find 169,637 Transfer to ADD Fad 1,239,569 SUB-TOM TMEEM 1,409,206 TOTAL H3ju18A1719 4,129,631 3,708,000 E1,714,902 5,567,000 OO@IIY SNUUTIQ4 DISU= M. 7 6/10/82 BLU= R93"Emmam Revised 6/19/85 LQ85-M FLgo%L YEAR Pevised 6/23/BS ISP11 47 CPSFAMM APPrOM APPRXMD PII[P4'. R03344MfD I� OR At110<PS TPIIE R=pr RDDW EXPENDMAW R00D0r 1983-84 1984-65 1984-85 1985-M Amnswrtt FUUM rash & Inueshmts O,p fated Reserves and Carl Over) 1,744,431 1,125,000 1,198,836 2,412,000 Fees 437,000 514r000 561,408 626,000 Fee Transfer frm District 13 67,000 Interest 6 Misc. Receipts 130,800 138,000 220,994 284,000 DelinWt Imes 52,900 71,000 74,755 81,0D0 SM-TOML 620,200 723,000 924,157 991,000 Tax All catiarn 11699,200 11800,000 1,888,845 2,D40,DD0 Redmelclsent Agesy Tax Pass-� 84,888 92,000 Slbventims 65,800 60,000 29,833 32,000 sm-7C1mL 1,765,000 1,860,D00 2,003,566 2,164,000 117II4', AVAUABTR FUDDIM 9,729,631 3,708,000 4,126,559 Sr567,000 Cam 1 acssrn. 7 De ilea 6/9//85 Revised 6/23/85 1985-86 FISOL MM FUND #7 AMMUMED CAPIML OLMM E=4= APPKFM APPHTEED ACIM F63244DM OFSC«PrICN CR ACOaM TITLE HDGET H1X£T EXPE D1TMES MIX71T. 1983-M 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 PrAaMS AND F90 EMMU 4S Treatment Plant Expansion 3,863,000 3,295,000 1,382,502 1,996,000 P fcation for Master Treablsrt Plant Fan. 10,180,993 8,646,000 323 8,267,000 R%U0 Linked Telemetry %Stan 70,000 125,000 125,000 Fla+Analysis 6 Recording 60,000 60,000 2,135 Joint Works Equity Piadsse 320,000 244,000 244,318 259,000 ffitlx}skev6 Fame reserve 64,000 Appcopriatirn f entts a,d Pan' iati Eutereios 250,000 350,OOO 4,661 10,265,000 District 13 6bmeFlon 3,000 31000 909 SUB-BRAN, 14,746,993 12,723,000 1,634,848 20,976,000 Transfer to Facilities lwaving mxd 2,628,000 2,628,000 TOIN. H9xnw4DM 14,746,993 15,351,000 4,262,848 20,976,000 Cash 6 Inteshnents 6ilpropriated Reserves and Carry ter) 11,753,424 13,212,000 13,212,275 10,562,000 Federal and State (rants 458,000 618,000 272 405,000 Flm; � Equity Ad]usbrent 8,130,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 294,000 38,000 36,235 411,000 Fees 112,000 190,000 212,161 244,000 Artsnmtlan Fees 8,000 5,986 Trasfer/Reld: rsenent fron District 13 67,000 Interest & Misc. Receipts 882,000 1,293,000 1,291,371 1,224,000 SLB+IOIAL 1,754,000 2,139,000 1,613,025 10,414,000 Transfer f= Operating F" 1,239,569 TOMAVAIIABQ: ]UADING 14,796,993 15,351,000 14,825,300 20,976,000 COLUM DISnU Q'A sue' 7 Revised 6 9/85 Revised 6/23/85 1985-86 FISCAL )MR FUM $7 FACI MMS RE4OMW APPRRWD APPRYM AC LAL R�D DE�W tR AOS>@S TTIIB FIE=! EUXZT F rntrnrnaas tom' 1983-94 1984-85 1984-85 1985-66 OCIE 1S ARID D4QID170RS 1Vstin Orage ibazfies 17 6 18 208,000 511,000 511,000 Tustin-Orange Reads 19 100,000 Main Street Tr,mk Sewer 280,000 410,000 70,566 2,700,000 Von Ramat Tank Sewer 2,425,000 3,500,000 11909,000 3,300,000 Main Street Amp Statim 1,750,000 1,750,000 150r000 3,400,000 Dist. 6 & 7 Relief System 283,000 Amp Stat. Nbdificatims MOGW MrarArftx 239,000 100,000 Late Rd. 129r000 30,000 30,000 M:Gaw SdYTnmk - Rill to mcc Z76,348 390,000 Crarxje Park Acres Sewer ire t Purchases 138,000 138,000 Alpmpriatim for District Facilities Inpr is & Exensicla & Ret^+�t 250,000 127r000 43,000 TOM RD031RDEMS 5,701,348 7,095,0001 2,129,566 10,222,000 AMUTA EE FUMM Cash & Inestments Carropriated Reserves & 5,180,348 5,955,000 5,955,289 6,232,000 Caaectim Foes 132,000 690,000 785,357 840r000 Cmtritvtims in Aid of Cmstructim MW Vtn Rammat 867,696 Main Street Amp Statim 2,250,000 Interest Itame & Misc. 389,000 450,000 753,194 610,000 SUB TOTAL 521,000 1,140,000 2,406,247 3,700,000 Transfer foam District 14 AM FVd E10,222,000 1OML RMWIR OUS 5,701,348 7,095,000 8,361,536 C3fREIY SUUM'IICN MSMCL ND. 7 6/10/85 BU= l0314IIMMCXE 1985-86 FIS L YEAR Ff2D 87 BOW & IIqrEFE3r - 1951 AMUM APPROVED PCRW. DESMPLICN CR A03XW TPII.E BUM HI)MI! EXPEmrTURES HD(£F L983-84 1984-85 1984-85 7985-86 BaM REQREUIr AND IITMERr PcilciEal m Bmds 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Interest m Bonds 2,030 1,680 1,157 1,330 TOM 16,030 15,680 14,157 15,330 A MMIZED GDEL RFMM 14,928 51,444 59,670 TOTAL FSXD FTam 30,958 67,124 75,000 IESS: AVAIUURF F MIW- Cash & Irnrestwnts Qqgcapriated I� & Carry-Over) 18,018 16,124 16,124 68,000 De]iMpnt Taxes Interest & Misc. Foeueipts 1,000 4,000 5,192 7,000 SU3,7OIAI. 11000 4,000 5,192 7,000 AM W TO BE RAISED BY WE.S TRXEFM F" C!£IVMNG RM 3.1,940 TPPIMER FROM AD) FU U 47,000 47,000 TOTAL AVAI A[RF FOMMC 30,958 67,124 68,316 75,000 Outst3rdirg G.O. Bmds 6/30/85: $56,000 Final Paym t [Ate: August, 1988 CONY SAII=CN R1914UCr NO. 7 6/10/85 SUO= MaMIMMM 1985-M FTSOC MR FM $7 BM a RTWESP - 1962 ESTIRRUM— APP OM APPIOM ACTEAL FMOMMOM DE30=Q4 CR AC rmv Trim FDOCCEP BMGEP F74ENDrIt 5 B[DM 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 BQv F8mRff4Nf AND IIdIP. OT Primi[al m 160,000 170,000 170,000 180,000 B*srest m Bads 61,590 55,990 41,058 46,890 TOML 221,590 225,990 211,058 226,890 AUMUZfD C EML FEd; 67,594 1,077r462 1r204r110 1OML RMPR30M 209,184 1,303,452 1,431,000 LM: Avnrrsssn FQDIM Cash S Irmesbments S ry-over) 122,487 81,452 81,474 1,306,000 DeUngF t Tames Tnberest S Misc. Fweipts 91000 118r000 120,481 125r000 S[H'l 12,000 120,481 125,000 AM2W TO ffi RASS"D BY M%= TMNASR PRT4 CPF1iA W FM 117,617 TEN2ISEF ER34 AM FM 1,104,000 1,104,000 TOM AVAUAME PQ�IDIIT.. D9,]B4 1,303,452 1,305,955 1,431,000 CL t [ 6/ 2: $1400r000� Daf O>l1NfY SAtEMkT[a4 OISMCT M. 7 W10/85 BDZr RE3242MATCOS 1985-M PIS L MAR F@D #7 BUM fi RBIIIIM - 1970 APPICM APPFaW AMW IM32449M DES RIMCN OR ACOOM 71UE BD(£P BDC£P FlOMi1UM BDCEr 1983-84 L984-85 L984-85 1985-86 BaM I8"SERMWf AM RFIE FM Principal m B3149 300:000 325:000 325,D00 325,000 Interest m Bvrls 133633 114388 79,838 93,900 TOIAL 433,633 439,388 404,838 418,900 A MaZED GERM:L 8MM 387,238 1,572,478 1,350,100 1OML M7MW4DM L82:0,:871 2,OLL866 1,769.000 IESS: AYAIIAffiE FwIbG Cash fi Lnpstma:Ts O+wro:aiate3 BC9eiVe5 fi U`�CcyOcer) 766,270 1 391,866 391,9ll 1,621,000 De�t Tames Interest fi Miw. Receipts 54,671 143,000 156,904 148,000 50B-1DML 54,671 143,000 L56r904 148,000 AMJ= 1D BE: RAMM BY 797Q'B TEMRX- R F%M 02;SrFU CN BPD TRADER F$ AfD BED 1,477r000 1,477,000 7OB1i. AVAIIABLE FCEDING 820,871 2,011,866 2,025r815 1r769,000 OutsbutU:g G.O. Buds 6/30/8.5: Series "A" $1,450,000 Series "B" $ 150,000 Final Paym t Date: Series A" August, 1989 er Sies "B" August, 1%6 CT � QSND. 7 Flavised 5W�1g0/85 1%5-M ply YEAR F wised NEVIS'BS DI91SiiCT M. 14 ACMIM1'® apr1AL Wi IiE�uma7 ai AaDum THE BMGET ACIUAi. F0 1984-65 1984-85 7g85.85 PFQ= Arm F70?FHITTE 6 District 14 FOmmatim 200,000 52,673 147,000 Ttarsfec m District 7 Facilities Revolving FYad 290,000 Anxcpriatim for District Facilities Dgxo�ts and Exbansias 290,000 35r000 TDML Em2inamm 490,000 52,673 472,000 AM IIABEE FUNDING Cash & Investments ��r) itc�rves S -0- -0- 449,000 antritutias in Aid fray IlM 490,000 490,DDD Interest Im]oe 12,001 23,000 101AT. AMUTA= FUN WG 490,000 502,001 472,000 5 19/Bs IYvlsed 6/Zi/BS QIRIIY A`II'IP1TQ2 M9II M. 1 3IaIIt�Q+OI56RQ'O3fIFT.TIR1 SlSRFi Pi4hL'Cs Pw a 1bm1 C.I.P. 1985-86 19ss8 19 748 L9B0-89 1989-W LW-91 1991-92 Pa Lt'oe TWU.ly Slete,^ la) ]25,000 125,000 �li]�s (a) 350,N0 `Ar000 s0ra10 50,000 `A,000 `A,000 50,000 50,[00 9rbdbml XD Fw! 475,0J0 175.000 s0,[-00 So,o00 50.000 50.000 50,000 50,000 t nk MaCa 1762 (a) SL1,000 Si1r000 OIre iUll t Pxxf a (a) 159ro00 E,000 311000 Ar000 31,= M,= 211000 m1wo ]H.000 Main Stint d k Seer+ 2,M,= P1,000 2r4 a,= D0,000 (2) (a) Vm Rama,ltmk Sea,c+ to (2)hi s,soo,mo z,xro,aoo 3,3ao,aao Mein Steel PY Sma (a)+ 3,550,000 150,000 3r000r0o0 400r000 01eta. 6 a )Pe31a1 SyA 9100o,000 A0,000 1,'por0o0 6,000,000 1,000,000 (3)M MCs+'StrD:Wt Para11e1 (3)(c) 390,= 390,000 MCGan Lift Static (3)(e) AU,= 2001OP0 Isn Mad Ping Statim (3)(a) 30r000 30,000 Ma%[tlwr Pulp Stalin (3)(c) Im'm Im,000 Mtv�llamua (b) 350,000 50,000 w m salm 50,000 `A,000 50,000 Wl= Sb'1bU1 ER Pub E,561,000 2,442,oW 8.800,000 1.9'l1,W0 2)0,000 5]0.000 1,510,000 6,090,000 1,068.000 f;?1kID 1OAI. 9.036.000 2,411,000 8,9]5,000 1 BIl,D]0 320.000 620.000 1,620.000 6.120.000 1,118,000 (a) Polly Pu4iai 1. Masb"Lamed Ealliti® pn�a tlY utlai mrttctm ryc) Mite yM 2. � � La:311ti® pmsentl We[davlg� ( McQn[yLaasl Ea7littee s. . . y E¢ Lubae deai9N�ticllm + Matlan m re reiebusaM b/ MO/Diati=14 ++ Rntima Fn m tembulW ty Oietict 6 a nW/Di tics 11 Nv6BN 1/23/03 C[NnRY SANITATION DISTRICT M. ) STATYMFNS DP I.CPSO CKN . P SSGL Pa. 1905-86 tN.. 1981-90 LINO INSCU ION 19B5-86 1996-8) 1983-88 1184.02 If0-f0 5-iee[ )oGl 0t8urzNG PU 1 Ne-e.. 6 Gery-Over I. Iaat .at 2,412,000 3,294,000 410,01000 4,902,000 5,617,000 2.112.000- READK 2 Share e[ 19 Taa AllacmtlU 2,245,000 2.325,000 2,511,000 2,712,000 219291000 12,722,000 3 Peea 6]6.00a )10.0a0 BO),000 938,000 1.016.000 1.10),000 a Inte[Ut 6 XlettllAccede InYe 561,00a 36B4Oa0 669,000 SD,000 606�000 2,236r000 5 otMr Res.... 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 tO7A1 RBKODC 3,155.00a 3.03,000 31,67,000 4,159.000 jiLtLl as 191065.000 N[A1 AMIUBCB P01OIN0 51567.000 6,657,000 7,957,000 91061,000 10,P76.000 11.6]].000 PYPDOITUR6 8 Share at Joint Ne[ta X a 0 11719,000 1,9]),000 2,273,000 2,614,000 3.06,000 11,581,000 9 CO11R tl en System X a 0 and OGe[ 0". 564,000 420,000 182,000 750,000 925,000 J.441,000 30 a.., ."Nair.... 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 TOTN. MINDITVAD 2,283,000 2,597,000 2.955.000 3,364,000 3,831,000 15.030.000 12 R.aerv.s 6 Carty-0.I G Here Year 312041.0. 4,090,000 4,902,000 5,117,000 1,11),OEa 6.447,000 13 Nat Yea['e D[y Pe[SM Pundln9 Requirements 11142,000 112,91000 11476,000 1,682,000 11914,090 1,511.000 1. fund Balance oI (Deficit) 2.I42,000 2.391 000 3.424.000 4.011.000 651 L 000 5331.000 C ,ITM PNb(S1 15 Aeaewea t Ca r,4Par Ptw "at 1u[ 16,794,000 19.968.000 19,097,000 19,591,000 20,418,000 16,714,000 RCC@NB 16 Cmetruedm Dr..0 403r000 191000 31000 18,000 206,000 651,000 17 Pee. CmneetlU 6.O,000 040,000 B40,000 840,000 940,000 4.200r000 18 ON.r 1.4.000 281,000 323,000 371.000 427,000 1,646,000 19 Sala et Cape RIgOU I11,000 )a,000 0),000 1,J1],000 1,085.000 IO [n[erOal t MI..Use.A Iemp 1.03.1000 11,41,000 11,30,000 1.119.000 2.001,000 9.717.000 21 ConttlWtlens In Aid Of Cars traction 2,250,000 300,000 0 0 0 2IS50.000 32 Plev-oa.ed BOYIty Adjustment 8,130,000 0 a 0 0 0,130,000 23 Other favr 290,000 0 a 0 0 290,000 2. TOW. R8v6NO8 14,404,000 1,463,000 31183,000 4,540,000 3,479.000 29.069.000 IS TOCtL AVAI U FUNDING 11.198.000 23,431,000 22.280.000 24.01.000 23,947,000 45.063.000 EXPENDITURES U SN[0 of Juice Nate True.' plant 1.996,000 2.513,000 2.369,000 2,043,000 2.587,000 12,508,000 3l Oistrlct C011ee4m ByaYm 1,975,000 1,821.000 320.000 120.00 1,620,000 13,356,000 19 "Pace, ease, A9trace-A PeymenU 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 PlerWssd Cqulty AdjGUent 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Other Capendltuu. 211,00: 0 0 0 0 259,000 31 TOTAL CMCNDITURD 11.230.000 ..331.000 2,181,000 316,31000 4,207,000 21,123,600 31 Reveres. 4 C."'Oe.[ t0 Nast Tee[ 19.966 NO 19.09T,000 19,591,000 20.468,000 11,740,000 19d10,000 gO1D fl (S) 33 R.vetvea 3 GIIy-Over Pfau fast Y.Ot 2.995.000 2,614,000 2.])1.000 1.889.000 11461,000 219,51000 RDENVC 34 Tau Levy 0 0 0 0 0 0 IS I.r .at 9 NLact liar... In. 260,000 244,000 208,000 161,000 121,000 1,026,000 tne[ Inc 11 0we 0 0 a 0 0 0 37 TOTAL REVCIVC 280,000 244,000 208,000 168.000 126.000 1,026,000 30 TD,P1 AVA33AOIS IMIRG 3,275,000 3.858.000 ].482.000 2.05).000 1,107,000 4,021,000 WCNDIApUS 39 PanelP[Irc1p1 A let evat 661,000 WIMP 593.000 576,000 S69r000 21,93,000 .0 OGU eapenditul.. 0 0 0 0 0 a 41 TOW. MENNETUDIS 661.000 584.000 593.00D 57610.0 569.000 2.90.000 42 eeaetv.c i Curry , G Neat Yu[ 2,114,000 2,274.000 1.089.000 11461,000 1,038,000 1,038,000 U Neat Year's Op Period FmdSM Requ_f[emants 21614,000 2,274,000 11989,000 1.481.000 11034,000 1,039,000 44 Pwd Glacce 0[ (Deficit, 0 0 0 0 0 0 SIMWRY adjusted fat xateo-%md Tra.uferq .5 A..... A Car,ry-0vet Pa. Let Yet 22,201,000 25.6.1,000 25,461,000 26.381.000 27,646,000 22,201,000 46 M. R6VENOC 11.639.000 7.110,000 7,154,000 6,867,000 B.1B6.000 41,160,000 47 N2AL ANAEWIP NNGMG 40,040.000 32,971,000 32,119,000 35.249,000 31,632,000 71.311,00. 48 TONAL. CaD.ITDGS _ 14,114,000 7,515,000 6,237,000 7,103,000 81607,000 44.116,000 19 Ree[v.s A CNAI AI ad, I., 25,666r000 25,461,000 26,382,000 27,141,000 27,225,000 27,225,000 50 Mat Meet's Dry period PwdlM Requllesents 3.756.000 3.S73.000 3,317,000 3,163,000 2.95s.000 2.951,00, S1 P1am BALYIC OR (DEPICIT) 22,U0.000 71,860,000 23.OIS.000 24,483,000 24,271,000 21.2)1.000 COUNTY SF, NITATION DISTRICT NO . 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY IVATIo.&, dr s ma n BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 1985- 1986 FISCAL YEAR CaJMY SA"=O4 DISMCr al. 11 6/10/85 B= H9024ff34MEMS !devised 6/23/85 Revised 6/24/85 1985-86 FL9ML YEAR SIMVM DFSCRIIICN CR ACCaW MME allG£P a7A,Ef 800GEf 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 R@70IREW415 Operating & Capital Regairements Operating Rrd 3,961,760 4,205,000 4,743,000 Acmnulabad Capital Outlay F1nd 19,308,936 7,431,000 7,741,000 Fapilities Revolving flrd 1,343,721 1,536,000 2,748,000 SIB-TOM OHIWTW & CAPPIPL 24,614,417 13,152,000 15,232,000 Debt ReUrerennt Hord and Interest Flyd - L%l 27,000 26,550 26,100 Hord and Interest F1rd - 1958 102,125 99,413 91,625 SIB� MEW RECIR04M 129,125 125,963 317,725 TOTAL REWIRSOM 24,743,542 13,277,963 15,349,725 EWING Operating & Capital finding Cash & Lnves4rerts Ck:prcpriabol Reserves and Carry-Over) 8,830,417 9,664,000 10,250,000 Other Revenue 14,334,000 1,948,000 3,304,000 Anticipated Tax A110catian Fccm 18 Levy 1,450,000 1,540,000 1,678,000 SUB-SOUL OIEFA m & CAPITAL 24,614,417 13,152,000 15,232,000 Debt Retirement Cash & Investments (Appropriated Iaserves & Carry-Over 61,323 61,840 62,000 Other Revere 7,000 13,000 91000 xm nt Faisal by Taxes for Debt Obligation 60,802 51,123 46,725 SIB-TOM EEBT RECIm4w 129,125 125,963 117,725 TOM Fu4xm 24,743,542 13,277,963 15,349,725 *Adjusbedtyfor Inter-F rd Trand'ers The pendingCoanthe wtanenof laest�re ollas lied vahatimv or other protests vhidn aimvnt to $277,486 as of Jane 30th. ODN1Y SPNT1ATIN DISMCf ND. ll P/1aD999 1 �� Revised 6P2, 1985-86 FMCAL )FAR AM P,ll OPEFATING APPFCVM APPRNM PCIML EMM44 ED DES=PftQ4 OR AO'1:IM TTTIE BUDMf BLMU E`pMrT ES BlIX 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 CFERUMG Director's Fees 4,000 4,000 3,045 4,000 Cattracb-1 Services Stare of Joint Operating 1,337,000 1,841,000 1,473,631 2,040,000 Trunk Mainteanre 60,000 60,000 115,073 150,000 Manhole & Lire Firs 50,000 Purp Station Maintenance 70,000 80,000 71,680 85,000 Permit & Ind. Waste Pdm. 51,000 40,000 44,553 75,000 Connection, Fee Adman. 4,500 12,500 80,149 38,000 Tax Qallection Dwense 3,750 3,500 2,698 51000 Treasurer's Inves t Aran. & Banking Fees 6,500 4,500 6,442 8,000 Utilities 80,000 80,000 72,410 80,000 Professional Services 5,000 5,000 2,300 5,000 Printing and Ptblicetion 1,000 1,000 217 1,000 Travel & Mtg. - Directors 250 250 92 250 Uncallectable Aoo ntS 21000 2,250 272 1,750 TOIPfi. @')ATM 1,675,000 2,134,000 1,872,562 2,493,000 N2+-( 9TTNG Interest 77,000 98,0DO 78,933 39,000 Exile SaS Applicable to Prior Years 5,000 5,000 51000 TOTAL FIN-QE[4iTBiG 82,000 103,000 78,933 44,000 T01AL CFERFOMr3 & NN-CPERFUMC 1,757,000 2,237,000 1,951,495 2,537,000 FEMRWS Appropriatim for Contirygencie 11326,260 850,000 937,000 Authorized General Reserve 878,500 1,118,000 1,269,000 T0m RESSMW 2,204,760 1,968,000 2,206,000 SU8110ML Regi>12F14•Nls 3,961,760 4,205,000 4,743,000 TRVEFE[S Transfer to AM 552,675 Transfer to Bond Fanrd SUB-TOML TRA1E Ei5 552,675 -0- -0- T0IAL REJ31R IR US 4,A4,435 4,235,000 1,951,495 4,743,000 COUNTY 95NT1ATIM DISPRICT ND. ll PPaaggee 2 BLMGET �aZ 6/TA/85 Revised 6/23/85 1985-86 F19CAL YEAR FCM #11 CIEPATING APPROM) APPRMID ACILM R80a+ENM DESCRIPTTCN C R ALOCONP TITLE Bmwr BOUGET EXEENDI100F5 3mmr 19A3-84 T984-85 1984-85 1985-86 AUUUMF. FUMING Cast! & Inve bt is (?mpriated Pesec�es and � ry-o* p ) 2,553,435 2,226,000 2,306,450 2,497,000 Fees Z77,000 171,000 242,376 272,000 Interest & Miw. Receipts ]84,000 208,000 289,959 235,000 Deli.xo^t Tam 50,000 60,000 56,643 61,000 SOB-iOIAI. 51-1,000 439,000 588,978 568,000 Tax All®tim 1,395,900 1,490,000 1,531,776 1,655,000 stb a tuns 54,100 50,000 21,497 23,000 s[B-� 1,450,000 1,540,000 1,553,273 1,678,000 TOTAL AUmnamc FIPOIN3 4,514,435 4,205,000 4,448,701 4,743,000 axww swrn ai Disma w. 11 6/10/85 BUDC£f rG3244MMONS - Revised 6/23/85 L%5-86 FI9M YEAR FIND #11 AGaiumm CAPrmL Q1d m ESTIRVMD APPRNM APPR)M PCRM fame D DF MPMQd Q2 PII13[RS TITLE 13DChr BUXEr E E DITLIMS IYmCEf 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1965-86 PROJECTS NO E GENDMUEES Treatment Plant Egsnnsion 2,971,000 2,538,000 1,060,106 2,369,000 Apr lotion for Master Plaucd Treatment Facilities 8,619,936 4,178,000 5,030,000 Nexlad-Baenirg Peng Statim Abandonment Slater Pub Station Modifications 129,000 200,000 50,000 Win Linked Telemetry System 15,000 15,000 15,0D0 Flaw kelysis s Metering 30,000 30,000 3,633 26,000 Joint Works E13udty Purdnase 200,000 199,896 . EerttngnakW?1Md Damage Reserve 76,000 Afffiation for District Fsilities LTprv.Rnents and Extensions 7,544,000 250,000 175,000 SIB-TOMAL 19,308,936 7,411,000 1,263,635 7,741,000 Transfer to FR EW TWAL Mwnmw115 19,308,936 7,411,000 1,263,635 7,741,000 AWMABIa FUUIdG Cash 6 Investments 0propriatet1 Reserves and Carry-Over) 5,110,261 6,237,000 6,237,163 5,891,OD0 Fees 122,000 U8,000 74,679 86,000 Federal and State Grants-Plant 352,000 477,000 12,720 481,000 Federal and State Grants-Sewer 75,063 Capacity Emhage - Dist 2 s 3 10,966,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 979,000 33,000 22,785 318,000 Interest S Mir Receipts 1,206,000 546,000 727,718 616,000 Joint Works Equity 21,000 23,000 Floo-based sty Adjustment 326,000 SI3-20TM 13,646,000 1,174,000 917,965 11850,000 Transfer from Operating Ft d 552,675 TOML Awnaanv ER� RG 19,308'936 7,411,000 7,155,128 7,741,000 CYIM SMATATIQ9 DISMCr NO. 11 "/85 BUD MT fWaffla-=MS F�Vised 6/ /85 /85 1985-86 FTS:AL YEAR lL-visa3 6/24/85 RM #11 FACIIXMM PhZMUn ESribq= APPRAM AM OM) ACIML rdra4 m DEMPIIQi OR PLII W WnE mp= %MWr EXPENDTTUFM BuID 1983-84 7984-85 1984-85 1985-86 PFn1tM MID E)MIDIMFIES Coast NiOyway Tank, Peach 3 1,050,000 AFa�pp iatim for District il,ties Eag�ts 6 ExbeMiSic 6 Pevrtxrse�ts 275,721 536,000 2,192,000 IleLftnrsen t Agrse t Paymaits 18,000 1,000,000 1,058,634 556,000* IDOL Fmpnmg u15 1,343,721 1,536,000 1,058,634 2,748,000 AVAUAME FUMM Cash a Imeabx is O�err) s 1,166,721 1,201,000 1,201,212 1,862,000 Crmectim Pees 90,000 250,000 1,603,334 750,000 Interest Im 87,000 B5,000 115,732 ]36,000 SUB-TOM 177,000 335,000 1,719,066 BB6,000 TOOL AVAUABXE. FM11.70 1,343,721 1,536,000 2,920,278 2,748,000 *Outstanding Agreemait SewJiff Estates for Coast Hwy., Reach 3 $556,000 4 Gamy SAMTTATICN DISMC I! PD. 11 6/10/85 BUXET iZ ATEaZ 1985-86 FIS%. MR Fm #11 am & II7ffiwr - 1951 APPRM "Mic= ACKM E MMPPICN CB AOa= TITS Y.Dmr aECEr EXPE DrIMM mrCEr 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 B85-86 Bam RE6WOU Min RT Ebr Primipal m Binds 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Interest on Bads 2,050 1,750 1,224 1,450 TOML 14,050 13,750 13,224 13,450 AW MZEK) GENWL REEM 12,950 12,800 12,650 TOML EB2jnEMEN15 27,000 26,550 26,100 Ib,9• AVAUABIE FOEDR4 Cash & Irn is is (11pmpriated Res s & C ryOwr) 14,653 14,684 14,889 13,000 DeUrgg t T_.- 1,000 888 1,000 Interest & Misc. Pa ipts 1,000 1,000 855 11000 SIB-TOIAL 1,000 2,000 1,743 2,000 AM W TO BE RAISED BY MUM 11,347 9,%6 10,31.3 11,100 TMEEER FIYI4 CFEMMG RM TOM AVAIIAffiE F[ Dr. 27,000 26,550 26,945 25,100 Outstardilg G.O. Bond 6/30/85: $64,000 Firel Paym t Date: August, 1989 COMM SM4rIP.7YQ4 DISPRICr W. 11 6/10/85 BIIDGEI' R9324RMMQZ 1985-86 FL9?+I. MR RM in BM 6 INIFawr - 1958 APPROM APPIUM ACIIPL MOMMM) DE CRIPIIQ4 Q2 AQDONr =E g= B[D($r EXPMITUM BDDGEr 1983-84 1984-85 1 1984-85 1985-86 BQID R IIRMEW AND WMEM Principal m Bads 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Interest m Bads 13,125 U 350 7,968 9,375 T03AL 63,125 61,350 57,968 59,375 AI1DMI7,FD GUOUL IMERM 39,000 3B4O63 32,250 TOML RB],OIRMM 105,125 99,413 91,625 1=: AVAUABr£ FUMG Cash 6 Irmstrents riated Reserves 5 fury-o✓ ) 46,670 47,156 48,091 49,000 Delmjy t Ta 2,000 51000 2,989 3,000 IntereSt a Mist. Receipts 4,000 6,000 1,827 4,000 6,000 11,000 4,816 7,000 AM7IM TO BE PAISED BY M*W 49,455 41,257 53,850 35,625 TOM MAUMEE. FU4) G 102,125 99,413 106,757 91,625 LUtstsndirg G.O. Bond s 6/30/85: $350,000 First Paymsrt Date: January, 1999 6��A5 asrtay sAvruTT¢4 Dlsnacr�. u P.j.t 'Dxa1 C.I.P. MA 199 1507-63 1968-99 198190 1990-91 1991-32 Pmio-l4nke)m]mec[y Sy> (a) LS,mo I51Wo F) � 6 N Ci09 (a) M.000 4,000 25,000 Slam[ Aw. Pmp Sta �. SO,WO So,Ooo (el Mir ll) is PNjc (a) us,= E1000 29,000 E,o00 251mo 5.000 5,000 E.000 9b'nm1 ACO Fl[d P0.000 4.000 116,000 E,000 E.000 5.000 E.oW 5.000 E,000 Ela[da Tank (3)(C) 2,M,000 21000,Ooo 61Eai's mlief T k (3)(C) s10,000 500,000 PGirt ,A.. �PW[ ON.) 500,000 SOo,= fta Ate. I of Sexy[ (3)(C) MIM 5'00,000 Pwal FBkrt Sax[ (3)(c) 205ro00 2E,000 MLswllam�s Mjm lal 350rmo SO,o00 s0A00 5U,o00 501000 `A,000 501000 50,000 SubM1Ma12R F[N 4.ass.aro w.oaD s6,aoP 531000 Sa.aaD so.ao6 w,aaa 3.755,ma SiMbtal Dist. C t. 4.325,000 4,000 1 Im 75.000 95.000 75,000 75,000 75,000 3,760,000 C®6t 3y. Stuot-See[' � 4 (3)(B.WMc)p 3,M,= -0- So,= 2S,000 3rO50r000 ktcw 641n (3)jc* 6 3,SOro00 Wr000 1r=,= 2,SOOr000 muff Um See[ (3)(c)• 5,MI" 350,000 3.200,000 2.00o,000 Cveg rn�e� �) 12,17S,00o O MIM 2E,000 4,050,000 2.650.000 3,=,= 21000.000 aua TC E. I6.m0.o00 MWO 216.000 300,000 4,35,000 2,Tb.000 3.21s,0o0 2,015,000 3.760,00P (91) FW.ly F1nde3 'Peajs m Oe� by 6.L[ v r)6 Pl t,ivtus t eA4n`e t NI Pa[haily Flmded (C) tbt E1[tlei L facilities P[�y w aasU 2. ebsta[-clmnai fa Mties P[ase�Gly I[ desig, 3. Ma^ -bla+ral ( MdW SC�d� S¢ tL &dgvoca U� 6/ss/es Nrlfed 6/il/05 o)OXrt S T Cs, lOX OIBTR]R X0. I3 Nr1fM 6/ie/BS STAIe MR 0[ BS-06 too WR 101- []SW BARS 1905-86 fXRWGN 19H-90 LXL MSCNRIM l9e Ye6 1906-e1 1117-1, 19..... 19e9-90 5-Tear Rol COPS.tXG Mis' l Nferns 6 Cfay a Prs Lose Ywr 2,111,000 x,xo6.000 1.>H.000 905.000 1403, 001 2,111,000 LNeROe 2 Se.l9 Of 19 Taa Allmatlm 1171.1.0 1.0]1,000 21024000 i.190,000 2,316,000 10:20L000 l PeeP 272.000 )01.000 119.000 1B0,000 r2].000 11721,000 [nro[eat f Xlawllmeme InOe 2)5.00: 19],000 116.000 59.000 O 59].000 5 Ocv[ Memx O 0 0 0 a 0 6 N Xo,RYL 2,241,000 2,311,000 x.503.coo 2.SO.,NO 2.791.000 I2,S19.000 MSC AYAl.. .Y Ro 6.)41.000 415e6.000 1,237,000 1.501.000 21390,000 15.011.000 eucolTlatss s Lure er aelnt NIs. R 1 0 2.060,000 2,341,000 216901000 Llo].000 1.569.000 uns5,006 9 Cellecam syftf.R a o aM oWr open. 111.000 $a1,aa0 55.1... Bu.000 1/110/000 I.Sn,000 to Ower L,sootean. 0 0 O a a 11 TYPL LIPC0135095 1,537,000 2,050,00 3.252.000 1.9e7.000 1.ae.o0a 1).101,000 13 Nfe[ref f to 1y 1 to x.., Yr[ :.m.eoo bnaaaa 915.000 (401,000) 52.:08.002 ❑,2ee,0001 Xet Yefr•f O[y 1-it" PUM4q Pe Llossntf 1.M9.000 1,125,000 11,21,000 1.99.,000 2,331,000 1,33,1000 14 Pwd lisi- o1 (0efleie, 913,000 109.000 9646000) (2,397,0001 14,627,0001 11.611,00 CA,lm P0!D IS) IS Refe[vf 5 Carryb t RICO Use Yx[ 7.753,000 7J.8.000 17,251,000 16.vs.ORO 16,11 S.000 ).)S1,000 RePwue 16 Conrawum 0wnlR nL000 23.000 1.No 2Loa0 244,000 m,000 17 reef, w,eee m 130.0e0 750.00 150,000 80,000 )Sa,oao 1.7so,00a !! OtM[ tr 06.000 90.000 113,000 12,1000 1.0.000 519.000 p Sfle o! u coley Riots 110.000 I1.0x..000 60.000 11013.000 0 12.423,000 20 Intevf[ 6 Ilanew! I.. 151,Oa0 1.124,000 1.497,000 LSI1,000 114111"o 1.11110.. 11 [lY9Nd 80ulty Adlmu.nt )26a000 O 0 0 0 321,000 22 Ome1 t. 21.000 75.000 1,125,000 21500,000 11100,000 1,123,000 23 TlRN. sNCM2 2,136.00 13,114,000 6,316,000 5191,1000 51,51,000 33,913,000 24 tOiAL AVA1W13 ruecom la..991a00 20.U2,000 21,4151.00 22,602,000 21,719.000 41,611,000 R%PLXUI�.W�3 33 S.vte el 301nt Wren T[e..e Plant 2.169.000 2,M1.000 1.011,000 3,611.000 3,0)1.00a 11JUA00 26 0.[[Ic. CoL lectim SIR. 2I6.000 300.000 4.125.000 3.725.000 3.275,000 10.4.11000 21 N)amrff..nt Agnewnt PgrOt. 556.00o 0 0 ISO.OW 150.000 956,000 2! lleref.ed R.rylq Adlufuenc o a 0 0 0 0 a oso.1 e�ena:wlea a o O O a o 30 MN. eYPCO)ITVIIPS 1,111,000 3,163,00 11,37,000 6.487,000 6..96.o00 26,111,000 It N.e1w. a G[rybver to Rest T«[ 7 33 6 000 17 211 0000 11.679.000 16.11S.000 15,272,000 LS.217.000 BMO rU.01S1 32 N.e We. . cae" 0.er P. Nft Ts1 121., 45,000 .x.000 42.000 41.000 S2,.ao RMROR 11 T.. Leay 53,000 65.000 6s.aao 6s,aoo 6s,0oa lll,000 le hrere.: I RSfwllaneeu. Leese s..0. .,00a 1,oao f.00o S.000 n,000 33 OVur Luna. 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 NIDL RKXR 56.000 69,000 69.000 $9,060 )0,000 333,000 ]] N AVAi.0 TLmIXO 118,000 114,000 111.000 111,000 114.000 MAN s2rc)lY.m.3 11 M!a r[iesiwl 1 Inu[ea 73,000 )2.00o .11.0 67,000 II.Roo la.0" 19 oenel se}eneitna. 0 0 0 0 o a 10 1 RLRR01TaRS 13.000 12.00 61,000 61,000 61.000 1,8 000 4 1 Nfetwf I Ca1[yOrer w Rose Rose, 45,000 a,000 a.000 a,000 O.o00 a,000 12 was. y«r. Oq ..11m [tosin9 Rwulr...0u Is.Oao 12,000 12.00 44,000 17.000 17.00. .3 ran! SaLsoes as IOeflcitl O 0 0 a 0 0 S0 T (6dlu.t.d tee inter-rW TI...felt) e1 Rest,- I C.[[yo... ... aa.t Sear 10JI2,000 9.599,000 11.015,000 17.705.000 I5.)56.000 10.313,000 e5 :P_LL .'sm S.Ole.00o 15.611.000 91924,000 9,592,000 ..516.000 46,715,000 6 NRLL AM1W13 fND1M0 15.310.000 25,2e0.000 27.963.000 26.397,000 is,212,0to 5).@].000 el MAL R@fos'. S 5,711,000 6.305.a00 30.256.000 10.511.000 11.211.000 .31,11,000 U Nsewn 6 Catty-Ovu w Otte Y.., 1111,1000 19.01S.000 ❑,705,000 IS.1S6.000 I].a11,a00 13,031,000 .9 Peas Year'. .11 re.101 Pwdlq Rtqul[e.enu 11,14,000 1,467,000 1,660.000 2.Wr A00 2,386,000 2.106.0a0 53 T019 ss. s OR (.tctT3 8,295,000 1].56B.000 16.011,000 11.f18.000 10.6.S,O.. 10.115.00. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY ��y12a-z'Iojy Ay ► o� J racy 0ri O Cp4 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1985- 1986 FISCAL YEAR O URN FANI7P.T10d DISTRICT NO. 13 6/21/85 B= RM44ZEffilaig 1985-86 FTS7+L YEAR S 44W DE9a=CN CR AC ODOW TTIIE RDGW BUDGET 1984-85 1985-86 RDTD I4mm Operating & Capital Reguirerrtnts Operating SVd 98,000 257,000 Axuncaated Capital Outlay Flyd 4,519,000 6,491,000 Facilities P Iving Paid 425,000 862,000 SUB-TOM OPEERMM & CAP17AL 5,042,000 7,610,000 Tom FsTno= 5,042,000 7,610,000 mumG Operating & Capital Rrdirg Cash & Irnesbmnts -0- 5,760,000 Other P»enue 5,042,000 11850,000 SUB-TOM CRERUTI C & CAPPIAI, 5,042,000 7,610,000 TOM AVAnABEE FU7M 5,042,000 7,610,000 *Adjusted for Inter-Fund Transfers BUXEr RE XM D6 MCNS 6/21/85 Revised 6/23/85 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR FR.L1 13 (STING DESCRIPTION OR AMOL R' TIME BUDQT ACTUAL E)tMr1UR65 BUIX£f 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 OPERATING Director's Fees 5,000 1,406 3,000 Contractual Services Stare of Joint Operating 6,000 5,724 54,000 Tr nk Maintenance 10,000 Mm ole Repair 5,000 arp Station Maintenance 10,000 Permit & Ind. Waste Aran. 1,000 1,000 Connection Fee Amin 4,000 26,000 Inter-District Serer Use Charge 2,000 Treasurer's Irrvestnent Ammin a Banking Fees 4,000 Utilities 10,000 Professional Services 10,000 Printing and Pli)1lcatim 4,000 Travel & Mtg. - Directors 1,000 101 11000 Utmliectable An7nmts 12 1,000 TTAL OPERATING 17,000 7,243 141,000 NON,0PERA5XM Interest 4,000 Expatses Applicable to Prior Years 6,000 TOTAL PA[+OPEPATING 10,000 TOTAL CPEPAMIM & 14JN-0� 151,000 RRERMS Appropriatim for Contingencies 73,000 30,000 Auttorized General Reserve 8,000 76,000 1O1AL RESER&S 811000 106,000 TOTAL R99111 -MIS 98,000 257,000 ODUNI yB D zr TICt4 Taz 6/21,/85 Revised 6/23/85 1985-86 FISM YEAR FTND #13 OFEAMMr. DESCRIMON OR ALOMW THE S D= ACMI, FO?F4DMUES BLIDzr 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 AVAILABLE MUM Cash a Imestn is -0- -0- 94,000 User Fee 21,000 59,454 66,000 Other Fees ('h Eer from District 2) 69,000 25,772 Interest 6 M1sc Somme 81000 8,921 10,000 SUB-TO1AL 98,000 94,147 76,000 TRVUMPi6 Trarsfer from AM Fvd 87,000 TOM AVAnABIE P@DM 98,000 94,147 257,000 OXW NO. 13 85 YB D� IICCNS Pevisal 6/223/85 1985-86 FI9M YEAR FIND #13 ADZPEX=D CAPIUL OTMAY APPRAW DESCR=ON OR ACDOF 4f TITLE BLUEr ACTML EXPfFDD= BUDGET 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86 PRa7F):LS No EU DITUMS Treatment Plant Expansion 91000 11,183 62,000 Afnation for Master laruxrl Treatment Plant Facility 500,000 600,000 Reiobzse Ptamation Ccsta to Districts 2 & 7 120,000 122,079 Capacity Riot Pmdanse from District 2 700,000 458,000 Appropriation for Collection System Capacity Rights Purchases 3,122,000 5,228,000 Equity Purdia.e 68,000 68,000 141,000 EartthgakWnood Dame Reserve 2,000 In-Lieu Servim Fee Payments bo Districts 2 a 7 552,500 SIB-TOML 4,519,000 753,762 6,491,000 Transfer to Operating Furd 87,000 Tom RDzJtlZQ4am 4,519,000 753,762 6,578,000 A%ILABEE Fq UM. Cash 5 Investments -0- -0- 5,383,000 Fees Receivable 550,000 550,000 Federal and State Grants 2,000 13,000 Flow-based BgAty Adjustment 70,000 Fees Transfer from District 2 2,520,000 2,845,800 Interest Trasfer from District 2 1,247,000 2,536,956 Interest 6 Misc Income 200,000 562,000 SLEHIU 1L 5,382,756 1,195,000 TOM AVAnABLE F[SIIING L4,519,000 5,382,756 6,578,000 QXRIIY SeTrM M DISIlUCr M. 13 6/21/85 IALY3.r F3J1+E MnW F�ised 6/23/85 1965-06 FISCAL YEhR FM 913 1TLD.ITIES FEVU.VIEB DESCRIPTION CR PCOOJEII' THE Kmalm ACRPL EXPDOMMS 9D33' 1984-85 1984-85 1965-86 PRaTECLS AND EXFkN WS Arpmpriatim for CCq—lty RightsPnrchasesm System 425,000 862,000 TOILS. M37mmlam 425,000 862,000 AVAIEA ry RMING Cash 6 InneShlrnts fAr-ary-ovated Reserves 6 -0- -0- 283,000 Cnvlectian Fees 100,000 525,000 Caviection Fee Transfer fray District 2 772,000 245,990 Interest 6 Nisc Inrrne 39,000 54,000 Interest Transfer fran District 2 14,000 36,249 S[B-TCAN, 282,239 579,000 TOTAL AVAILAMLP. E MUE 425,000 282,239 862,000 6/19/95 oWxlr sxrrrv.T2m oxsi>acT w. u �u5 a+ Wsi7aa o3uu1c1Ta4 sss6.l 9R1hC6 Pans Anim 0fet i&- T l 1995-96 1996-97 1967-M ]568-69 1999-90 19"1 L991-92 L992 6 &wtl U6 m ma Riw[ Intem6 (2) 6,357,= 438,000 143,000 459,W0 179,000 269,000 317,000 963,W0 3,550,W0 6cutJt snu Are mw6 Ti roapwr (2) 1,031,W0 124,W0 151,000 7s,W0 247,000 421,W0 Richfiel6"b k (2) 34,M 7,W0 $I= 39,W0 Ralingg 9We k (2) 24,W0 2,W0 51000 3,W0 14,W0 Dp ial i Wr mpwr (2) 56,W0 3,000 2,W0 14,W0 S,M ]2,000 Tale I�w (2) 347,W0 a,OW 25,000 S4,W0 Sl,M 363,000 Ce�tn Cnym LlN6gp (2) 7,484,000 3551W0 7,129,W0 n.,+wtvH[ea lMerMwf (2) 1,373,W0 3041W0 110,W0 111591W0 (2 0 & 3) 6pe G>e+ttutim (2 491,W0 37,000 A,WO IW,OW 0[enge rr 6 kr I , �roro (]) 2,211,Wo 166.0W 179,W0 1,975,0W TN mlene Inf =Pw6 (3 b )1) 40,wo 3,000 SIM 34,W0 s laL Inwe pex (1 6 7) 520,000 20,M 99,W0 59,W0 352,000 Db=ic 70w[apmo (7) 4,733,000 165,W0 742,W0 496,W0 3,33SAW raw9m 500•2. 24,W4.W0 458.W0 163.WO 6/].WO 363,W0 470.OW 1,639.WO 2,5N,WO 16.475,0W 6/2)/9S CgDTY SAMTAV(se OlnalI M. 13 ".'1"J OP PWJCC'SD GAS. P9P19 PISCM YEASS 19B 5-B6 Ih. 1969-90 L.IND_= 0W.IP[lM 1915-S6 1906-87 1987 80 I9RP-69 1989-90 I S-Yea[ Mrel OT MTI.G M1MI I veurn! L CauY ' P[Of Laat Tu[ 16.000 106,000 119.000 133,000 I18.000 'alwo 2 PSee 66.000 9i,000 131.000 I19..0 20.000 R).000 1 [ Mace tlanenu! Leve ]0.000 I1.000 ❑.000 1i.000 16.000 61,000 i 0[ae[SRwx:ue 87.NO )),000 59.000 21,000 0 71L000 S 1t]W. RSVCVm I61.000 182,000 203,000 326.we MAW ]A)).no L TO AVAIU8. PUNi.G 25).WO 288'000 MIND 359.... m',00 1.131.000 Su[e .9 ietn[ xe[ia . L 0 S6.W0 63.000 11.000 81.000 N.000 3E1.000 i Cel:ee[ian Sy3tea M [ O aM Oth., Opel. 11.W0 l0).000 II6.000 1]O.OW lU.WO 595,000 1 ONe[ sepaMiau[ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 S. A CIP9.v0t)MS ISI'm 169.000 189.000 21110.0 211,000 157,000 IS Reserves t Glir shr N ..at Yp[ 106,000 1L9,OY0 tJ 1.OW I48.000 W..W0 1N.000 et 1. Pf Dcy Pe[Ie6 F.41" Requl anent! 76,000 65.000 95.000 106.000 119,000 119.005 13 PUW fief.. O[ (hifieiq 00.000 A.000 38,000 12,000 SS.000 51.210 wl-u rlxD lsl 11 Rex[vf3 -arty-Over trY test 'has 5.666.000 1.192.000 1.715AC0 6.630.000 tOq]0A00 S.E65.000 W1-hs IS [ m an Octs 1".. 1.000 0 1.000 6,000 II.000 I{ Px3: Cmneeit- S25.000 650,000 11025,000 1.025.000 3.025.000 1.3S.A.. l� ONO[ 550,000 0 0 0 O 550.000 L3 Sale o9 Capacity Rights 0 0 0 0 0 0 thesis.[ S .cell ahem. lane 116,000 720.000 821.000 955.000 1.191,000 4.226,000 e. 59x 1[y A6ju.eseee 10,000 D 0 a 0 m'.00 21 oc e[ irce3e 0 o a 9 0 0 22 )ORL DT'IlDK 1,111100. 1.]21,000 i,osL0o0 1,181,000 2.1i0,o00 9.::7,MO 21 :O`AL am C.esu PN0I.0 1,440,0110 $1063,000 9.S96.000 10,801,000 12,460,000 C2YMl)lT3 )i sea[. 0: Jn1.i x [S e[.f Tataent Plant 12.00 78.000 7..000 9S.No 8L000 390A.0 2s ou sea,.,,.- Co1l.eUm Sy.us 481000 163,000 643.0.0 363.00 "...G. 2.051,000 ]L Rf[aNciesent A9xeaent Payments 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Plx?s:0 [.1utY 30)mden[ 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Oe e[ Capev[tu.fa M... 71.000 59,900 23.00 0 391.W0 29 NLtL HPED01:K^S 7.6.000 318,00 116,000 481,000 SS1.000 LIL.WO l0 Rex[Ve. t Ca[ Ove[ m.e.t Yx[ 616,21000 1.)1S1000 1, 0 00.000 10.120.000 11.50"No i1.9C9,900 I $_Y IAJ)uTN 6x [.x[-NM ![.nY.fca] ]: Rue wet L C.rtp . P.m teat Yeat 5.760,000 6.798.000 7,814,000 8.953.000 10,081000 5.162.D00 ]2 TTjI. IItYLVK IAS0.000 6476,000 1.995,000 2110.1000 2.03.000 9.906.000 p NTAL AVA[fABIl MOI.G 7.610.000 1.21i,000 9.659.000 11,137.000 12,971.000 13.666.000 la g sepess1TW3 .12.000 410,000 1061.00 111,000 188..00 3.565,000 15 Rfu[ref t Ca[cybuef to seat east 1.19110Y0 7,864,000 9,953,000 10,468,000 12.06].W0 12,093.006 )i aut Yu r4 Dry Puial Purim Re0u1[e.entf 11,000 8S1000 9'lose ]06.000 119.000 115.000 ]+ [[0A MIA.0 OR (DEFICIT) 6.122,000 7.779,000 9.950,000 :0J62AD. 1L96:.000 ll 96a 090 I APPENDIX THE JOINT OPERATING FUND AND CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND BUDGETS WERE ADOPTED BY THE BOARDS ON JUNE 12, 1985, EACH DISTRICT'S RESPECTIVE SHARE HAS BEEN INCORPORATED INTO ITS BUDGET ON THE PRECEDING PAGES , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGETS c Si'rATIOV ek"oP°litaa 0ro9�S)� d o U ° n� y = e N — e ORgNGE C013 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR ]985-B6.FID4P Q0Md1NG tlaD BUD= SO®I18 A "/85 SURM6I OP IMrNT1QVIJ@NSIIN yo. MN95pM flP[8f IDS Devised (A) (a) (c) (D) (e) �M4aap��[ ➢rseaee . . Buyer 1989-85 t ip Elating/ ppVemdabDry rw t Mai.[ Baimv ft Paammdea et IUmmerdacim !Y[dabes 1wrease II teaaaalmac[eams) [ 1. Net Sala[lea, Wages 6 eeefits $9,500r000 $11r100,000 $ 608,000 $ 992,000 $1,600r000 -Eatitated Cot l eaea in staffl� Nex pmltiae, 7-egaatls9 facilities) 9-mmet re+ BPly[3'61 B re ad[e�ts[ilial inL�98yh9m5®nt meMximd [ J$t of tieE fnar 6R06 lenNt will be filled is 1985-86. 2. 0dar Oaetml 6 aeaioal 2,840,000 3,855,m0 — 1,015,000 1,015,Om Cee cal ease/ Wtpoee Ote3alant9 FerAc Chloride 435,000 M�tm141 l 4.su1P3ides/ 011mire 410,0m i Voa Disi �t Oaetla,We[s 140,000 O trol wa Pidss 1mlyw .(31o,m0) Derber aaUdge/ n19[ogm pxoxidt .000,000) 11 sulfid. 3. Aofeasla al 6 Ontract 2,028.m0 2,M,m0 1LmD 340,m0 351rmD $300,00o- ling disposal of grit aaeenirgs Service. ad ws. tivated Slog's w art-t� ladfi11.8OK) $40,mo-cotsids lab ee[vlme fa:t pe[m�t 4. Dgrip t Q ges 130,0m 140,000 10,m0 — 10,m0 -P itimai vab t®/=ppmmrrt to e,flut Plant vai, erm vide. 5. eeieinikslnte[e1m 1,54o,m0 LWD,m0 50,m0 M'000 250.m0 ad � level &face&ce[epairs in Servica A ml dad � 6. iteeatd 6 Mmiboeing 2,181,000 1,690,m0 — (491,m0) (491,000) -$500,000 rL$ ucttm.t for t8R3 permit oao- plian.e 7. Dtllitles 5,090,000 5,4m,m0 107r000 283,ODO 3m,000 -$l0o,000 for estleoad iaereases in ice[ .W.1 SMDOO for aiditiael mt ml 99mm male de to rev AGM [ales for rev s Cs at Plan m 2 8. other Mata[Sa1s Stpplie. 111881000 1r239,Om 16,m0 35.Om 51,mD -91m.000 i=ease in liability it ame ad 6 Dotside Service. o0er miror innatlmary Lcreasese are offset i atyrdDttrl aalPros�tS35,0000 Lcio ii. 18® perndb-rambea U mWli. 9. 5txal J.bit Operating $24,07,000 $21,673.m0 $802,000 $2,374,000 $3rll6r000 s OfF.e 10. _ _ _ ' Mvetme and tr 898 m0 838rmD) U. Net Joint Operating $23 •D9,mo $26,775,000 m2 Om 12,374,000 3 l76 m0 Slpie ate Schedule I JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY 4/29/85 COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITURES & ESTIMATED CARRY-OVER Revised 5/8/85 FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) Budget Recommended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est-d Carry-Over 1984-85 Budget or 1983-84 Expenditure or to Fiscal 1985-86 Decrease 1984-85 Decrease Year 1985-86 1. Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits $9,500,000 $11,100,000 $1,600,000 $7,602,300 $9,528,800 $1,926,500 ($28,800) 2. Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants 2,840,000 3,855,000 1,015,000 1,698,900 2,046,000 347,100 794,000 3. Professional & Contract Services 2,028,000 2,379,000 351,000 1,112,400 1,627,200 514,800 400,800 4. Equipment Charges 130,000 140,000 10,000 147,600 124,900 (22,700) 5,100 5. Repair & Maintenance Materials & Services 1,540,000 1,790,000 250,000 1,574,100 1,618,100 44,000 (78,100) 6. Research & Monitoring 2,181,000 1,690,000 (491,000 169,600 183,100 13,500 1,997,900 7. Utilities 5,090,000 5,480,000 390,000 4,163,400 4,757,100 593,700 332,900 S. Other Materials, Supplies & Outside Services 1,188,000 1,239,000 (51,0001 993,700 872,900 120,800 315,100 9. Total Joint Operating Expenses $24,497,000 $27,673,000 $3,176,000 $17,462,000 $20,758,100 $3,296,100 $3,738,900 10. Revenue and Offsets 898,000 898,000 -o- 739,500 897,900 158,400 100 11. Net Joint Operating $23,599,000 $26,775,000 W,176,00011 $16,722,500 $19,860 200 $3,137,700 $3 738 800 Schedule II BUDGET RECO[MIENDATIONS 4/30/85 JOINT OPERATING FUND Revised 5/8/85 Fiscal Year 1985-86 ALLOCATION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES A B C D E F G E I J GALLONAGE FLOWS 1985-86 FUNDING 1984-85 COMPARISON 1984-85 Estimated Estimated District Flaws Estimated 1985-86 Percent District Estimated Required District Required No. Past Year) Increase Flows of Total Contribution Carryover Funding Contribution Funding 1 9,534 MG 642 MG 10,176 MG 11.65% $3,119,000 $ 432,900 $ 2,686,100 $ 2,770,500 $ 2,630,800 2 26,966 (91) . 26,875 30.78 8,242,000 1,143,700 7,098,300 7,327,500 6,958,100 3 27,587 1,160 28,747 32.92 8,814,000 1,223,200 7,590,800 7,247,200 6,881,800 5 4,617 (95) 4,522 5.18 1,387,000 192,500 1,194,500 1,359,300 1,290,800 6 4,920 (354) 4,566 5.23 1,400,000 194,300 1,205,700 1,550,500 1,472,300 7 5,344 259 5,603 6.42 1,719,000 238,600 1,480,400 1,503,300 1,427,500 11 6,333 325 6,658 7.62 2,040,000 283,100 1,756,900 lr840,70O 1,747,900 13 22 150 172 .20 54,000 7,400 46,600 ----- ----- i TOTALS 85,323 MG 1,996 MG 87,319 MG 100.00% $26,775,000 $3,715,700 $23,059,3001 $23,599,000 $22,409,200 i I' JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGETS Schedule III JOINT OPERATING/WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS Page 1 of 2 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR 5/7/85 ESTIMATED APPROVED APPROVED EXPENDITURES RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR AOCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET 1984-85 BUDGET 1983-84 1984-85 4th OTR EST'D 1985-86 1. SALARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS 2. Salaries & Wages 9,139,000 9,765,000 9,485,900 10,682,000 (a) 3. Employee Benefits 4. Retirement (OCERS) 1,373,000 2,010,000 1,400,400 2,071,000 (a) 5. Workers' Compensation 80,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 (a) 6. Unemployment Insurance 0 0 0 0 (a) 7. Group Medical Insurance 497,000 730,000 152,800 127,000 (a) B. Uniform Rental 46,000 42,000 39,800 45,000 (a) 9. TOTAL BENEFITS 1,996,000 2,902,000 2,171,500 2,899,000 (a) 10. TOTAL SAL, WAGES & BEN. 11,135,000 12,667,000 11,657,400 13,581,000 (a) 11. LESS: Cost Allocation and Direct Chargebacks to CORP and Individual Diets 3,020,000 3,167,000 2,128,600 2,481,000 (b) 12. NET JO PAYROLL 81115,000 9,500,000 9,528,800 11,100,000 (a) 13. MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERV. 14. Gasoline, Oil & Diesel 285,000 265,000 226,900 265,000 (d) 15. Insurance 200,000 214,000 199,100 291,000 (a) 16. Memberships 18,000 18,000 14,000 18,000 (f) 17. Office Expense 57,000 97,000 83,400 115,000 (g) 18. Operating Supplies 19. Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals 1,250,000 11105,000 1,111,300 1,650,000 (h) 20. Sulfide Control 240,000 585,000 298,300 1,425,000 (h) 21. Chemical Coagulants 700,000 1,150,000 636,400 780,000 (i) 22. Other Operating Supplies 300,000 370,000 262,800 505,000 (j) JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGETS Schedule III JOINT OPERATING/WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS Page 2 of 2 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR 5/7/85 ESTIMATED APPROVED APPROVED EXPENDITURES RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET 1984-85 BUDGET 1983-84 1984-85 4th QTR EST'D 1985-86 23. Contractual Services 906,000 1,818,000 1,487,700 2,164.,000 (k) 24. Professional Services 171,000 210,000 139,500 215,000 (1) 25. Printing 6 Publications 69,000 100,000 84,700 128,000 (m) 26. Rents a Leases - Equipment 45,000 130-,000 124,900 140,000 (n) 27. Repairs 6 Maintenance Parts 1,290,000 1,540,000 1,618,100 1,790,000 (o) 28. Research a Monitoring 200,000 2,181,000 183,000 1,690,000 (p) 29. Travel, Meeting & Training 50,000 50,000 48,200 55,000 (q) 30. Uncollectible Accounts 2,000 2,000 800 2,000 (r) 31. Utilities 4,725,000 5,090,000 4,757,100 5,480,000 (s) 32. Other Operating Expenses 95,000 95,000 91,900 110,000 (t) 33. Expenses Applicable to Prior Years 50,000 50,000 39,800 50,000 (u) 34. Other Non-Operating Expense 10,000 10,000 1,300 5,000 (v) 35. TOTAL MATERIALS, SUPPLIES 6 SERVICES 10,663,000 15,080,000 11,409,300 16,778,000 36. LESS: Cost Allocation and Direct Chargebacks to CORE and Individual Dists 118,000 83,000 180,000 205,000 (w) 37. NET JO MATERIALS, SUPPLIES S SERVICES 10,545,000 14,997,000 1,229,300 16,573,000 (x) 38. TOTAL JO REQUIREMENTS 18,660,000 24,497,000 20,758,100 27,673,000 39. LESS: Net Revenues 620,000 898,000 897,900 898,000 (Y) 40. NET JO REQUIREMENTS 18,040,000 23,599,000 19,860,200 26,775,000 (z) Schedule IV NOTES TO JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR (a) Salaries, Wages and Benefits - See attached Schedule V for salaries and benefits estimates and projected payroll savings. (b) Cost Allocations and Direct Chargebacks to CORP and Individual Districts - Represents direct labor and benefits chargebacks and cost allocation to appropriate fund for which the work is actually performed (CORP for work on treatment plants' capital expansions respective ACO'or FR funds for work on individual Districts' collection facilities capital expansion, and Operating fund for maintenance and repair of same). Also reflects administrative time chargeable to self-funded insurance programer and Industrial Waste Division and Laboratory Division charges to respective Districts for monitoring program. (c) Net JO Payroll - This line item represents the net salaries, wages and benefits chargeable to Joint Operating Fund for administration and maintenance/operation.of the joint works facilities, after chargebacks to other funds for services performed by the labor pool described above in (b) . (d) Gasoline, Oil and Puel - This account includes gasoline, oil and diesel fuel required to operate stationary treatment plant equipment as well as over 200 pieces of major mobile equipment such as vehicles, cranes, etc. (a) Insurance - Includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity bond, all-risk (earthquake and flood) policy, fire, boiler and machinery policies. The major elements of this account are $195,000 for $10 million in coverage provided by the comprehensive all-risk policy and $75,000 for the excess liability policy authorized by the Boards in April, 1985. (f) Memberships - District memberships in Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies. (AMSA), California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) , Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (BARFPA) , and Long Beach Safety Council. Current year expenses and 1985-86 appropriations also include a fee for membership in AMSA's Conference of Coastal Agencies (CCA) , which works for approval of ocean disposal of sludge. (g) Office Expense - This account includes supplies, forms, small office equipment, drafting materials and postage for all departments. (h) Chlorine a Odor Control Chemicals - The Districts presently use chlorine, sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) and hydrogen peroxide as primary odor control chemicals in the treatment plants, and also use ferric chloride and potassium permanganate as backup chemicals for chlorine and hydrogen peroxide, respectively, in the event the primary chemical distribution systems are out of service for repairs or maintenance. Chlorine expenditures are expected to increase more than $400,000 this year due to increased usage levels and a 53.1% price increase. We expect to use an additional $435,000 of ferric chloride to provide advanced primary treatment, or physical/ chemical treatment, at both plants, and will soon commence use of new chemicals such as ferrous chloride to reduce sulfide levels in our digester gas to comply with new AQMD regulations. The estimated cost for ferrous chloride in 1985-86 is $500,000. During the course of this year we will expect to optimize use of the various odor control chemicals, but expect our overall usage levels and budget requirements to remain high as we maintain compliance with increasingly stringent air quality regulations. Page 2 Schedule IV (i) Chemical Coagulants - We expect that polymer usage levels will decrease in 1985-86. Following extensive trials of several differentpolymers. this past winter, we received excellent bids from five bidders. The unit price for the winning bid was 26.98 below last year's price, the required dosage rate per ton of sludge for the selected polymer is also lower than' the polymer used in previous years, and hence we have reduced the budget for this line item by $370,000 to reflect the higher efficiency and lower price of the selected polymer. .(j) Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners, hardware, janitorial supplies, tools, laboratory supplies, etc. required to operate and maintain existing and expanding facilities. (k) Contractual Services - $980,000 in this account is for the gate fees for 25 loads per day of sludge to be hauled to Coyote Canyon for disposal, and another $900,000 is for hauling waste - activated sludges and grit and screenings that the Regional Water Quality Control Board has determined are too wet for disposal at Coyote Canyon to an out-of-county landfill capable of accepting these sludges for disposal. This account also includes appropriations for groundskeeping services, trash pickup, plant site sweeping, data processing system maintenance and support services, and temporary help to respond to unanticipated, periodic increases in staff workload. (1) Professional Services - Includes General Counsel, CPA audit and miscellaneous accounting, engineering and other consulting services. (m) Printing and Publications - Budget allows for in-house and outside reproduction costs and reflects expanded management information system and increasingly complex administrative requirements, as well as continuing demand by public and regulatory agencies for information on Districts' activities. Addition of a Public Information Officer (PIO) to the staff to improve our public education program on Districts' activities and our non-industrial toxics control program is also reflected in the increased budget for this line item. (n) . Rents and Leases - This account includes cost accounting system charges to the Joint Operating Fund for outside equipment rental for major equipment used for emergency repairs. The 1985-86 allocation has been increased slightly to reflect the increased usage levels of large equipment required over the past three years to support major repairs and maintenance in our upgraded and expanded facilities. (o) Repairs and Maintenance - This item, which is for parts and services for repair of plant facilities, reflects a conservative authorization to allow for unanticipated major equipment failures. Should this increased allocation prove to be insufficient in the event of major unexpected repairs, a transfer from the unappropriated reserves of the individual Districts would be necessary to meet the increased obligation. (p) Research and Monitoring - $1,500,000 in this account is for contract services to carry out the extensive ocean monitoring program required by EPA Region IX under the provisions of the Districts' NPDES permit, which became effective April 1, 1985. The account includes the Districts' contribution to the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) being conducted under a joint powers agreement with other Southern California municipal dischargers, and also provides for operational research and evaluation to develop optimum operating parameters. in -the treatment plants. Page 3 Schedule IV (q) Travel, Meetings and Training - Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required increased Board member and staff travel in recent years. It is expected that considerable travel will continue to be required next year in connection with our continued efforts to obtain approval of ocean disposal of sludge. It also includes technical training for staff on new regulatory requirements and equipment installations. (r) Uncollectible Accounts - For miscellaneous accounts that are determined by the General Counsel and Director of Finance to be uncollectible. (a) Utilities - The $4.5 million allocation for purchased power in this item reflects an anticipated 0.14/RWR rate increase from Southern California Edison. Our natural gas usage will increase significantly due to new AQMD regulations requiring us to use only natural gas in some of our newly installed engines at Plant No. 2. (t) Other Operating Expenses - Expenses not chargeable elsewhere, such as freight and miscellaneous items. (u) Expenses Applicable to Prior Years - Represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year(s) . (v) other Non-Operating Expenses - Miscellaneous items not chargeable elsewhere. (w) Cost Allocation and Direct Chargebacks to CORF and Individual Districts n For materials, supplies and services cost allocation and chargebacks for same purposes as described above under (b) . (x) Net Jo Materials, Supplies and Services - This line item represents the net materials, supplies and services chargeable to the Joint Operating Fund for administration and maintenance and operation of the Joint Works Facilities, after chargebacks to other funds. (y) Net Revenues - Budget amount is for sales of various sewage treatment process by-products, revenues from the wastehauler disposal facilities, sampling chargebacks to individual Districts, and miscellaneous items. (z) Net JO Requirements - This line item represents the net Joint Operating Requirements after reduction of the total JO requirements by the revenues generated from said of by-products, charges to other agencies, and other miscellaneous operating revenues. JOINT OPERATING FUND Schedule V (AND WORKING CAPITAL REVOLVING FUND) 4/30/85 PROJECTED SALARIES & BENEFITS 5/3/85 1985-86 Revised 5/7/85 Anticipated At Full Payroll Recommended Employment Savings Budget SALARIES & WAGES 11,543,000 861,000 10,682,000 1 BENEFITS: 1. Retirement 2,240,000 169,000 2,071,000 (2a 2. Workers' Compensation 144,000 24,000 120,000 (2b 3. Unemployment Insurance -0- -0- (2c 4. Group Medical - Self-Funded 563,000 27,000 536,000 (2d - HMO 133,000 6,000 127,000 5. Uniforms 49,000 4,000 45,000 (2e 6. Total Benefits 3,129,000 230,000 2,899,000 TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND BENEFITS 14,672,000 11091,000 13,581,000 NOTES: 1) Salaries & Wages - Full employment projection based on the assumption that all 401 authorized permanent positions and the 40 Summer Work Program positions are filled as set forth in the personnel recommendations. Because of our ability to sometimes temporarily minimize staffing by adjusting plant operational modes, coupled with personnel turnover and strict controls on filling vacancies, we have targeted our payroll- cost at $13.6 million next year (7.328 over the 1984-85 budget) which will- realize a payroll savings of $1,077,000. If, however, it becomes necessary to fill- all of our vacant classifications because of a heavier than expected workload, it may be necessary to allocate additional funds from the unappropriated reserve accounts of the individual Districts. 2) Benefits - Remarks above under Salaries and Wages re full employment of authorized positions and MOU's also apply to benefits. (a) Retirement - The Orange County Employees Retirement System has more than doubled the Districts' contribution rate as a result of a change in actuarial assumptions and rate evaluations, and has phased the increase over a three-year period. The rate increased from 6.72% in 1978-79 to a rate of 15.16% commencing in 1983-84. The employee MOD approved by the Boards in November, 1983 called for the Districts to pay an additional 4.5% of each employee's OCERS contribution, and this change increased the Districts' contribution rate to the present 19.66%. (b) Workers' Compensation - Amount includes total estimated expenditures for the workers' compensation program set forth in detail in the enclosed Workers' Compensation Self-Insured Fund Budget on Schedule VI. An appropriation of $120,000 is recommended for 1985-86 to maintain the current level of accumulated reserves as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. (c) Unemployment Insurance - Legislation made this mandatory in 1978 for public agencies. The initial rate of 0.8% was subsequently reduced to 0.4%. and was further reduced to 0.1%. Because of adequate reserves credited to our account in the state fund, no contributions have been required for the last two years, and the state has advised us that none will be required in 1985-86. (d) Group Medical - Includes both the Districts' share of employee medical plan benefits for the prepaid IR4O plans and the estimated costs of the self-funded indemnity plan. Schedule VII details the expected costs of the self-funded plan. Budget increase reflects increased staffing level and higher premiums for the BMO prepaid plan, of which 75% is borne by the Districts. (a) Uniforms - Budget projection is in accordance with employee MOU's. We have been able to obtain favorable bids for uniform rental and have recently renewed our existing contract for another year. The unit costs of uniform service have not increased for several years. i JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE V! WORKERS' COMPENSATION SELF-INSURED FUND 4/29/35 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR Revised 5/7/95 .'_984-85 1985-86 1984-85 ESTIMATED RECOMMEND2D EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGES I. Salaries, Wages & Benefits 20,000 10,000 20,000 2. Benefits/Claims 110,000 95,000 110,000 3. Contractual Services 15,000 10,000 15,000 4. Legal Services 5,000 -0- 5,000 5. Professional Services 15,000 8,000 15,000 6. Supplies & Other 1,000 -0- 11000 7. Sub-Total 166,000 123,000 166,000 8. Excess Loss Policy 14,000 8,000 91000 9. Total Expenditures 180,000 131,000 175,000 REVENUES & RESERVES 10. In-Lieu Premiums 120,000 120,000 120,000 11. Interest & Miscellaneous 60,000 65,000 60,000 12. Total Revenues 180,000 185,000 180,000 13. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) -0- 54,000 5,000 14. Transfers & Reserves 503,000 523,000 577,000 15. Ending Reserves 503,000 577,000 582,000 JOINT 4MS CP6PATIW. BIDME SCHEM E VII SELF-ItWM HMTH PLAN TRW RM 4/29/"5 L%5-86 FISCAL MAR 1934-85 1985-86 19P5-85 1984-85 Ebi"TM).M AT ETZL A4yKAL RMJ- E'_...] EXP'MIT.RES BLucer E*FSDPl`.i:1E5 r'.T '.S'BNP SAVING i3[�' 1. Claim - Mali®1 501,000 400,000 534,000 (34,000) 500,000 2. - Irdemity 10,000 3,000 12,C00 (2,000) 10,000 3. - 0mtal 65,000 65,000 83,000 (10,000) 73,OCO 4. S'- Tbtal 576,CjO 468,000 629,000 (46,000) 533,00.0 5. Contractual Services 26,000 24,000 31,000 (5,000) 26,CC0 G. Stop Lr s In9rs 68,000 45,WO 62,000 (12,000) SO,C:C 7. Total ENVerdituces 670,000 537,000 722,000 (63,000) 659,000 FEVE14IM & RMERM B. Io-Liac Premium £can - CSDOC 469,000 396,000 563,000 (27,000) 536,C - alplayee 71,000 60,000 127,000 (27,000) 100,C',; 9. Interest & Mis llmr s 8,000 -0- 10. Peimrse from Stop Loss Insu 10,000 -0- ll. Total F�ttunal 540,000 474,000 690,000 (54,000) 636,C::' 12. E�ss Pe� (D¢aditures) (130,000) (63,000) (32,000) 9,000 (23,C::' 13. R s and Transfers 130,000 63,000 32,000 (9,000) 23,, 14. Erdin3 Rser -0- -0- -0- -o- - JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE ':III PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF-INSURED FUND 4/29/35 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR Revised 5/7/35 1984-85 1985-86 1984-85 ESTIMATED RECOMMENP_D EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1. Salaries, Wages & Benefits 1,000 -0- 11000 2. Benefits/Claims 25,000 4,000 20,000 3. Contractual Services 6,000 3,000 5,000 4. Legal Services 8,000 3,000 8,00^ 5. Professional Services 2,000 -0- 11000 6. Supplies & Other 500 -0- 1,000 7. Sub-Total 42,500 10,000 36,000 8. Excess Loss Policy 40,000 41,000 140,OC^ 9. Total Expenditures 82,500 51,000 176,00C RIVENUES & RESERVES 10. In-Lieu Premiums -0- -0- 911010 11. Interest & Miscellaneous 55,000 74,000 70,000 12. Allocation to Other Funds 20,000 11000 15,000 13. Total Revenues 75,000 75:000 85,000 14. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) (71500) 24,000 15. Transfers & Reserves 625,000 627,000 151,010 _ 16. Ending Reserves 617,500 651,C00 651,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOINT WORKS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND 'i�PNITATIOA, O A%•k e�aopolilan Oros IST 9P �I U 3y — K ORgNGE COUN�� 1985-86 FISCAL YEAR 6C'23�^"A-1 L29/85 5/8/85 Q,PS'1N4¢IIIAY�A.'.3L TLD SPMJ4 Q� �8LBC6' ?`IULTTIIi15 A`ID @PAWSfI£ MP' :31.FI➢JL iIIL6 IX1Ii5]W 1965-86 1905-06 6�Sf ]9&-85 EV}i NQrL WW FIYM E11XFAL9AR @4314l81! Q3LeQ' F£.�iP � 23QfQ�A' EQI 'RIIAL 1 11.656 3,Vl,= 21WIM ]l IM 3,04fi�006 2 3 .% 30,M,M ].62].000 1,%2,= 30,12(.M 3 32.92 111232,W0 B.15].Cm 2,M,= 30,395,609 5 5.10 L%6,M 1,M3,M 12'm 3r212,000 6 5.m L963,600 1,M6,= 3a'm 1,906,006 7 6.Q 2,300,M 1,591,000 405r630 3,295,006 11 ].Q 2,M,M 1.MIM 2,539r606 101TIS ]00.m 36r63 m MIMI B 6.310.000 33.6L3,606 '.1]hDJfE A-2 4/29/65 Perisa3 5/9/05 GPPW.UIRAY FE�Q.VRL F110 sumw�n�oFs�cc r +s un m2+alaxne➢�Fa+.amm w� F2aArslw 19B5-B6 1965-86 F➢ rL4 BD3.T ]9&-05 EQ311Y 'lOAL(^41 FRSt FfmW.i5A6E CaffJSffiE 0[911IICf F.R4P �::v6 Ff9hT5 FARIT�ATICl1 :3�r,IIIJIIWTF2.9➢ 1 6.914 3,M7,909 2,215,000 564,000 3,046,000 2 M.M W,xir000 7,456,000 I'M, 0p 30,=,000 3 1.91 30,530r000 7,659,000 119%,Q•O 3➢,395,000 5 6.20 2,311,000 1,%Or000 4%•000 2r242.000 6 5.% 11964,000 1,4T2.600 364,000 1,%4,000 O 9.93 3.395,000 214611000 626,000 312%,000 11 7.52 2,%3,000 1,663,= 4'ISr429 2r539,000 m .O6 21,000 19,000 4,000 4 30Al8 ]➢0.60 34.m 99U 24,M,000 6,310.000 �m 620,000 C+PLIDt RIRTY hFQ.UC%'Z!O 33SII:i:. �1 SUMBF[CF.AINP'+51116 CNSIlSL1aCN TTI-T.P:&�^S V9/05 PL9T[, kFAR 1A5-06 Yuisai Vli/fly £E,'fA9,Vll w'fP411fD *SSM..2� S:M'ED YIIdI IOAL P2liFS1' OZSf M P!LG BS-06 BE9)TW ' CFDFft 2bT 6/'A/85 SLU£f 3:II'b A. GiM1Yf F\LPD?0gC6 1. ]5 MO Lip[oai'lYead,mt at Plaat No. 2, P2-23-6, %594 3,MS,m0 2,720,000 165,m0 Project Dmtirt xe,/Q t � -P 1 2 005 mo 2 )20 mo D351m0 2. 1Il� Solids Ptu SiM ar Diep U% A a. Project a n,,c Pep,[t On 525,m0 MOM 551mo WOM pl. cl sOl Site b. [Psig,arireeeieq s mvs[[,crim 39 cs,om 2]U,mO A,2m m0 SUMDISL- 3aE4 2 K MI 0 545 000 51000 39,400,WO 3. Bid[ap11C#liapility a[ Plant,b. 21 P2-25-2 54MLC J 050 m0 3.BODION SO,mO SOM.(dW9f FR11D35 K M m0 7,055,000 ZIO,mO 39,4m,m0 B. t4]i.T4NT flDifD P!�1fL6 1. !kw ani[�laa5+e�Mj r Mj. a Plmt)b. 1 1. S®d a[ks, PI-M moi 39,mO,W WIMO Bm,mo 30,m0,m0 2. A itiaul e[in[ry PsMd. 5,4m,m0 5,4m,m0 J. Ampla nt of Pci yPe m1" 2 215m,mo 1,mo,me 11SOO.o00 4. &3ubllina of nil' &sire 3, 4 e 5 L250,mo 112m10a S. RiablliMUcO of Digesre[s 566, EN-0 l rill L250.000 K,ma X51m0 SWIM 6. RhaCi indM of Digcs M 760 I'M,om m,mU 1,KO,Om ). Ba`ubllitatim of Dills a 9610 1,m0.m0 115m,m0 S. A atim% o Apmveie a90}4m )50.000 MOM 3M,m0 9. Pd0ltiaal Oi�.s esilltic 818m,m0 81m0.m0 M. Solids 4 teci,g ar S=[ a D�ts am) A 6 61mO,mO 1,Ma,ow ],MOM 3,04,000 5 894-0 U. Q =e Pm3ti w SIBfi4-0 2,6m,m0 l.]0,0m 1,Dm,mO 2150100 12. tn+F[eaa¢e Pla,[46 t t Ss 2,�,000MOM 2.250,om 14. FhfSimWemiml'1'taatna,t 6 ty MOIOW SO,Om ]Dolma 0. fl t FC+e[Cae itim iSility M4 9,BM,mO IM,mO 500,m0 91m0,ma 15. Elst[ �llabilitY SJ]m-0 1,TI0,m0 l,mo,mo iYlo,ma >6. i,ig,e;,y ere�mr[wtim Ptt,i�ss 4DD ma Mo.ma 2. Mo,ma 5,p-.yppl 06 6]o,Om 395.000 9,m1,m0 ]fi.n4,m0 •S� 55¢M'IfD eSTLMID � 37M V �+R 'OW.PALeZ'f C.3f V P[CL BS-9fi 36-9]:.0 mc G Pls[M. 2 1. 'fi' Sa+d ala Grit A lsy.-'.I b MO,OW 301000 WO,WO 2. 110001000 LOro.000 1. 3001000 700,000 FM, P2-91-2 4. MMi3:Gtim of WL� C ilia 1,300.000 1,Z10,000 ]W.000 Off 5. Pdv�ilim[im of Jigmmm F&G. WY-0 2 481.5-0 1.SOO.OW 100,000 1,100.000 300.000 6. IMabilimtim a Oigea .W Ri-O61aTJ ffB16-0 1,J00,000 L10.000 l.500•WO 1001000 ). rolaEiLitacim of oig trs Pse 4,500,000 500,000 1.000.030 9. Oi¢sfGr ttr{w.'�ilitatim ad Liprtncv,ca 4,i00.000 `A.000 ,450,000 W UO 9. m.r<riy Sysav lm�nem,s, P2-28-1 ad 2 46✓7� i•000. LSM. :1000 2W.000 .' .000 ]0. Saudazy 9a.in Coil Fhomtim 519W-9 2,WO,OW 11:6010DO 600.000 ll. CMC0tm1Paa13cias 51664�3 12,m,W0 IW.WO a.425,OW 8,2Y.>,0W 12. P.yaimLC+®iml It atamc Syst® 6 0.000 wo,OW 14. Ughd Aar('.e+eratim 53206-0 LS.700,000 ]W.000 �O.00O 19.OW,OC1 14. Li�tl�g llergy(maria[im Pmjsts M1,0W 3WOW 150.OW ACM1Kal 409W,W0 3.N0,0W ll925,W0 1L325.W0 e. REem1aK ad,bit 1. Cmm OLtdi C PH.Pt . 210,000 WO,WO 2. siseiml.'SllaCilLty, . 2 50]01 LSW,000 =,W0 90010D0 500,000 3. Nrfall Sa .Smti 9 OVM104 35.SW.0DO m,0W 9 31M 34.2W,000 4. Lab.a y2uildi9 D, im 2,000,0W 10010D0 L900,0D0 S. 2.S0.0DO 9W.W0 1.600.0DO 6. Pmte[ PirR smCim mdatuimtim 120W,W0 iLWO,WO 5LL>AKal 9 ]W,WO 332A00 1019.000 m,250," St&1CIifL- :E41 MIMIW0 fi.5W000 01014.0W 199,049,000 2. `lp,atl lYhd)etal:li,nr 2w;ss a. ICla ,m Pl t W. 1 $170pEC-lj 5.000 L16],6W ],ll0,000 b. 1Yaat t Plm N 2 �ffiE O-1 ]5,2k1,OW 562.OW 3,1]S,WO 1L52J,000 c. .]o4t a LYe�plmc Psi:iti� 9�8 @1 fi,9W,000 SW,ICd fi,215•WO d. EgLL�m2 9QBIIIE P-1 ],.'T.J,WO 1.429.0W S,WO,AO SIH'Rlp•I.-IL`Y2 3] 906,W0 59'3.OW 6.W1,W0 )1:0'9,OW Eton Pa]e 2 'Aii :ORL P!dST 033f:Y 9CL 9S% %-37,JV` 3. Sys inls5 Mu. 21ayEDt Ikn[[s �'029 ED.mO 213,m0 36,m0 G Lipmed hmNe�c SCtli¢ �:a®1/ 9295/IlS9/ SID,mO 256.m0 ]S6,mP Q�timl, ?fltiacim. Ps.l 992 c.. DD 0 aD Dispm ae�Di•:-^-� Pmjec> 44fi904PJ %a.,= m0 ImOlmmP 3ma.m e. Di rnS. n Y 1. P t,b2 ma I'M,= 14 " mi'mO ims,mO ]. ,S :b. 1 1.] lmO 13,m0 Mm0 I,m5,m0 9. VD C sadist 9952-OA b0,m0 111.Om ll9.m0 g. 1. �IatE Pml%<s 1. 131.103pliaQ Sallies 4� MmD I= 10.m0 JI.M 2. D:Xveize eba Aic 5¢ s 30.m0 A.mO - h. C'emi®1=sdli�4 ad�tIl ol L3xc�'s :00.000 IDO.ryV SB-1mN. - 11F.Y 3 fi MIM 1 m, I I'sulmO 3 TA.m: SOIN..W' 3Avf:Rlm�4.+5 9J mlm0 9.292.m0 30.F13.m0 193I SBt.a6 Jm>lf AU.�SL0R2W$�'LBhNS 2m 332,m0 15 35/,^V ll M,= M3,W,.M C. FeffiaE Rf'WG@ HII£f NILGVS¢6 J=,= J m0 O 30DY.JASL YIX4�3L4C^�Y:Sj]Lb.`YNI$ 33,. 2,= B.S'= M M,m0 233.9V,m wrmc anaY tE.¢v_; e_n Sxi c-1 �aa am ?��'�•^m �•� -.�•w:".¢4 far. w. t Le/a5 �,c �aa :-d>5fi hWrad L13/96 0.pSt IOPL Pfp5L2 Q1ST =1 4L 95-86 96-i].i`,➢ O�4 CSf is ki95 9>Y£: 9.:V�7 1. Grit ssy a L+Pm t 160,cpG as 0 I]s,000 2. ''rW Hail¢ 4nib[1c9 Sys , Ri-1G1 S192f0 5),CO !21wo Zl= ). 5-qt Cm l der S .m n60B-o ],m] 31= 4. (.1ennlT Bl . 80,000 Wl= S. o 4N ., Upw 100,000 ' lm a0,000 6. G:y92[ Pipiml iuimc ]W,000 Ml= ]. ¢ttrL9 Ys�-mmennm 1P0�000 i0.W0 li0,S0 B. Otyeae[QeanLq 3tl kM'oi�lmctm ILtl,OlO IOJ.006 9. b-,cle Rap SmGlm 1a," 14 1M U. Yaxtmx waaacle SreRlem ass l 51,0 21,OJ0 24.= IL SaR1� tk`.a:.:s 51888-1 wltt wlO 12. Hx:kbc Ca.�;sl IRaGn�.c a sin IO—M wl, 14. ucc^ Mlm �Li,. me m+d ayary t EO,. 50," li. `Y Pm t Ceimc Liy�ci,q ],n0 ],.106 L6. tkw Pl Pi M" MMIMl= a.aoo a0,000 16. Ma L ad Scsi:Y =IWO 1 ,J00 M. Pa]L9 Cipm�rt=l 10 l= m1wi M Mee. O , �r_vl . it pr d®.m'1m ISU,0 uo,cJ 19. MJx 9o-.Il :nparsmrt Paojsb 150 WO 13U,'CC 101T1.PLW[ 1)0:111 P4iA13 ] A],WG SS 0.q 1,16] 000 1.15!.)Ft QP1W.@C1Y.3`AA'?G i]NJ 9�ffiQE?3 .�Yl h^O.i'SIIa'..•-•.✓`FA?i1,3�5. -'_avR"`FN3'3:N"`O. 2 _ZY. ".�.3 t415-ffi �34LT� SfiW'Ln 5I'_rvy"�➢ -T._•�^"l 5'b/95 33 c= 3--Z 1. is-jai,:'�¢GXes x �30:1¢_. xll9 4®b-] 150.000 36•JTl '94.J]0 — 2. L ti.3x4 ?'_?i`gL tt. >b-e it SOO,WO :OC•-W 3. Lty Oar _3 i it I¢»IiTI 50.000 �).CW 9. s¢'a[y Ct_?g I-9m1s Lr000 30.0]0 S. LP� aoa Catt Sml , at iet Sp.WO 50.000 S. �. tim, eYt¢ P.S. !S.CW 15.000 ]. w5'ly O.ar�'.iei• acO a11003 5," 5.000 3. o,32 ltiticaec L eis S lm 5 lm 9. Oic s. ?i 'N i^.pca�Ca MIM WIM ]50,000 10. O`JI.dS: S =S W ?Tn{5 MIM 50,000 U. UiQ wr Clt"alm L50.000 U. sbai, ?. l t 95rW0 95,030 D. S ,ie -.?s s¢ias 25J.OW b0,030 14. C tat vg Sy Iulm 159.000 n. 4310-0 tt t. Pl.%nt b ?q 100 m ID,.30 3l," M. OrRt t C ty Wat it, 100 4966y BO,SA b,NC b,000 17. `e;is City 6'arec .9=11abi1ity 3:,000 M'" 0. tav� a 2'.aM tta+c syt- EI MIM 5,000 s,sa M. 3rsulace S.ad tUc'.ate[ ?3-:..�. E,M 25,000 M. S arev Krl�i aims I30,OW i5.000 n. iMec SOET+Ca 5C PG Sa'.LAd s UlmWIM 10,000 D. .uM Ga Cas Capar,�c�2al- 'as:Enc 1 = 10,000 25. Diesel C�sa . rtiu .t Bai AQMdi, ]S5'" 150,000 25. Digit a el. is 3 tarot 3u1aug 4)9]-0 5,030 z.000 3,000 25. saa,,® ;wcaeic Septets 4BBS-0 ll,CW 5,000 >•000 n. s tty G x at P c 4eae-n z3.mo a•aaa M. � Cafes at ti 2• FSi-1 , 4554 1W.0W 25.000 'S..:00 E. asc-Pail atl GpeirtJ L>EaoN�.sts 3tl,W0 "Im n. • mad saaxity 300,W0 ]WOW n. m3au^ms fa�rec Office ad�fts[x hvn, A:-132 51835-0 100,010 30.OW MIM lm B. Fs i® lm l : tnsea:s L50.W0 150.OW M. ? tat m 1:cCm 3ms 1 atl a 5189}-0 150,000 '" N0,0W N. Lsfn�raeim L:6 ad et�la e�c SAl3b• IDO•WO b.000 GI.000 4H90 M. oatl*Rat. Ga rtaum , S M Lmrnrs[s 110.000 Ulm M. i?sre c Suu ,l Sw i 5184» 3],W0 ro•0]l1 10,000 P. .Yisc. Rb[ Ca•bl setii¢ ad Lipte�mUim M,m 3L.OW �. Wee s®1t i�mea�: erai=� 300,000 3W o00 1OLY. ?Ll'vf 2!0. L0z'L� a roJ.000 Sit OW 3,IM X--0 PP Mm RSRW2x:sa �=1 1Ei aw 0.•HLG T�.W.^IIt PRl)x6 -jui 6 INd•]R[.wc eX411iS 4/S/85 52?.1L Y@R 1395-3fi Peaiv.l y/15/BS 6S2M'FD FSQJW"FD _STi'•P�➢ c52�A'ID xAR 10IN. PR:.:LT rx�S2 N PCG d5- 6 96-d1 a`0 CPG"A �3l' 6/'A/35 31T"" �CSIO 1. P3ep tams m d.a. 81wr Ols] l #W3 L'0,000 n,x, U51000 2. dCtall brrciy 65•ttU 85,003 3. w3Ly 4"Guth for Grrvity sld 100,000 4. frnpmoerl:!r Systrm et M.Ssp 5),000 50,mo 5. Ftel X'r.prtntG :xn 251000 Z,000 5. tetlecgrwtl Ftxl^sik:4silllmttcu 911,000 001000 1. Pl t 2 100,000 1501000 S. M - 9rt1.1 010,000 8. O11 n 000 ]5 000 213A[..AAT Q£0.M'ffe15 30:T>t PT�'G 905 000 530,N0 315,000 Q]243Y SAY[AT3Q! O251 w 'J32' 1985-�-86 T..iLtS 6 Op+F�i .Mild`1E QH BISRS 6'3f i1fE1Y (FF[S CFPf. l4QCFS 5@II£ EQ $} 6:mf.5 S¢m _`Jjl'.P 6�c EQ nx L 5Q CIfFR J".rv' `O. �Si L`FII 55561�Ib0 55552-!!vJ0 c3%,r' M 555=' 00 5'-66t 55567� 5">S6d-t T 5556A-!d _- 2150 Nare9aimr 1,m0 12,9m 14116m iia,3..0 2230 Fi'Bnx Due . 31850 3,a5] 2220 3911U 39,:'0 3110 Chef Rgire r -0- 3310 5t;nclnmtla:r SIM 32,'3m n,:cD 3330 Past MLKaws elm 63,55 5,M 450 240 ,,, 45 3340 CblleRim iXtlici°a 35,m0 5,900 ]50 2,150 :J.600 33m M lan l 30,m0 32,m0 23,Il0 m,lm 4m DW F1ect''.m1 43,5m 2,865 1,7:3 3M GcrlvinMa 2,M I'm 1,m0 ll,m0 22,63 3916V 3510 Oir =Of¢ecNlae 1516m S,6m 3520 else Cpmadt 11,m0 9,9m 7,600 ll,950 51900 3,M 10,655 3580 IXssamct® 550,050 4,m0 10,V5 563,6_ 3590 Irt3.uuial Hazy. S,Om 4,Bm 7,800 951Ec 1,1m M,450 P10 De ty Chief 9gumr 4 3'290 Cacral nn,L ri, VIM 5,m0 4,500 Ulm ]O3,G3J M1ODJ. ff a6 mwS 154,M P,900 3n31455 32,m0 6921350 49150 351,495 QP1TN.a2¢ay tmw.vice e.D stRl3ne va35 yss]5'la3sa m s2�nn eza]lxs oy�,P.�ze Par�2x.ca'Dnnz<s a/35 vu/es Rrv1sM 5/vas W4i Bi-Y k2olNt!�::CSW DPRW4:.:'/ !CII+.'..i,iC CI!^R Pf,_.^^• !TdhP_. UP:AP2E 2!a);rCS � -_t•:6 A. GRN!' :!fLkD PIIIhi-S 1. fi YD Dpa c nesramt at Pl t Pb. 2, P2-23-6, 515s/-D ms,000 16$r000 Pmj.,:t(meln]aeicy'3a<-opt 528�RIfAG - IIE1 1 165 000 155 000 2. 01t be fs.+113. h¢ssLg stl Di' l U70O ,A a. P[bjtr:': and F irm ml 's6rct Repzt m 4,000 SSr000 P . Diaps l Site b. Deal,Eglrce[irg -0- O 5I8-M1OAL - P4r1 2 A m 55,000 3. Hftaullc Reliability at Plant.%. 2, 12-25-2 S/mO 50 " 50 r00 :OPL fNt.'P eV®PRVfL� !10 000 M 000 50 000 a. MiGRMJ:F[[aID CRIECP 1. !Lv ae[1 F bx#.ral MJ.p Prtje:ts a. Plant N. 1 1. Hmd a, P1-m 5P02-0 a00,000 900,000 2. M itiw Prinary F. UiUes O 3. P P�t of R'imary a m 1 am 2 11000r000 1r000,= 1. Ri,ebLlltatlm cf Prissy 6adre 3, 1 a 5 1,250,000 11E01000 5. Ri,sbillts[im cf Digesters 516, P,0-O6]A-1 S1a1" ms,000 i05,000 6. �Uitatim of Di,,awrs 'lab 50,000 50,000 1. M Wtetim of Digsters ga10 -p- a. wl.tlm system Dpmaie,ta 990}p00 330,000 ]2 I= 9. A timal Digstat Facllities O 10. Sa11de DsaFerlrg ad 6tt<a, Dgaveae,ts nm/ A a 111�1000 111261000 aS" U. O.br Cmtml P ULU. 9H64-0 1.000.000 1.000.000 12. to-•Pr¢wua P]mt'Atat System p 13. Ptrysiwyov,3m1•Rea t syaTata $01000 50,000 1/. C Ual P r Dmeratlm Fslllty 5a204-0 500,000 50U,000 B. el.trial Pe ,azity 1,000,000 1,a00,000 16. Ug,tirt 1 rgy CmuCatlm Pv]sb 310 wo = = 9,b+IMa1 a 001 000 7 005 000 4,1 000 B00 000 ` CmrinH fine P^9e 1 M'Z }2 '.tAl Bf� nEIIS.'4S u' �._:EtY.^/ '.t•'4+.':.'�:. 6 Pls[ 'b. 2 1. �' tle+dnc%�tif [eaoml Sn� 3�O,W0 a0,0W 3. re ,c P+. ' L:e:r-•s -O- J. t>tlubi11�cf __' 99li A Iwl m,000 FW. P2-.v42 4. Wablli'itim of P-L' ,C ifis 3a45 1,ZIO,rV 1.2J0,m 1 LE 5. wta�ili3rim of 0ig�' M, � 51� Sl'r0 1,100,WD 1,1W,W0 6. >aL.i-llifacim of Oig-sS PL, :M-LA3 z. w4ti:ui�sm of oil Sax Ws 'm va,W3 d. Oig¢[ev aS1i::trm a i *sp�o cs w.000 i 9. SLSP� 1,M1'=,0W I 11 W0,000 M. S�luy Bas:._`ain mv,aim 490T-0 WO.WO 500,W0 11. ?Iy%�..11T�;A*S1li 4%-0 4.4�.W0 4,429.000 •'. P1y1te�tSyYm MIM X;O,OW 1 . Kai Pse[GecnCim •AT14-0 300,W0 SW.000 14. Liy;fig StE�Ma1 'l�93.� WO 5.?50 C9] 514i9, z La^.."' L'Ke[ t a .io;.Y 1. man Oisddt3e Cality, s P[q[am 200,000 3. W1 all al lid:d! Sb2 9 .04 we,= i J. CUKall 4<nhtilE `J'OJ/ST104 Lm'W0 245.W0 '/J3,W0 4. Last sb[y S:i!di J maim ]00.000 m.WO i0,J00 S. r -K=tiR V S Sum i�l is;m 900,OW 9Jd,OW 6. Etv^Rm:i ^�+ifacim O I Sib-0bU1 3,M,WO 245,0'fl 1,150.OW 1,fi9J,OW SflY1CPw- [L'M1 D.104,W0 v.5W.00o 11,d21,]W 2,43,O 2. Va+avl %bolt Pmjc¢ i Peclam[im P!m[v. l 9�IE C-2 1.16I•WO 3TJ.W0 ]44.000 Ml= 0. 1`.aC tPLxG 2b. 2 9W®fE 0-2 J,119,W0 1,439,W0 LIM,= M= I .lout 6 L>�:?imf Faclli:iea 93@IIE 9 2 5]O.WO S9,Wd 480,W0 i d. Sip t 1 429 000 304,m1 'BS,OW 310.W0 SLd�IOYS- PE1 2 S,J01.0V 2,56 0W 3.655,0W 49J,0W Ca,tlrvroi Lean:a3= '- 4]ES]HP 9-2 PP7t11£l fia`@F:r:,] PGASF�' 4AX 85-86 et�^t.'eRC�RI IM^V.fSFNf/ !P"2Y.LIC RSER 3.lITT _. ___ ✓Er..;_R1�^...I }:;^3.ffY5 3. Sgs R j—< a. �[ plm/P.111 Afs[s r5M2-0 X'm k:.000 b. Dwµ 1tm-n.c SG is �Y.ya `�.��, 4695/4899/ 156,OCC L65,000 Piltra[tm• eP:.) 4902 c. u lteePK1[ x[1 015?aal Pmis[s ]00,000 I VIM a. Oep m of pstl ZeLenm 4]59-0 •D,ro0 .. Gigesmr z w:a:[a�a, s acl 4saoa o 1. eLntl. . I SOO,000 500r000 2. et am4]. 1 DLNO , [. Eergy SPtlia 4Q6H1,A IJ9,W0 M 1J9,M000 9• +Kt6l mmllarn p[aista t. cp . Orr:tia+x Sc.ia; 4fl59-0 ll,JJO ll,000 2. C4Xivize :'.,ai[ Seams s fi1, ]0,000 b. Credoal ard 6ntm1 Up[o.�[n[s 2)0 M 000 3MI,000 ss-ao�L- I'El J 1 su mo 1 su.000 1':S`IIi+]Vtlf eV®Pl�4.5 ?J B1B 000 10,556 WO ]6 999,0]0 I,1]J�OCO , .1lQ.�T 4IIE6 OML4L m R>;iJ6@fN5 ll 098 000 10 656 " 17,j^3,0I C. lE4RE 501 Fv.^v'E 3T�S#:L as 3 000 000 1,W0 000 I,00?,000 i SM•000 SOUL ZIINf 4IIC5 @S6IS.TfCti !lglBu&vG N 4B8 000 ll,656.1""1 Iv.p9.Op� 1�221,OW QPIIPL Q.RAY�41QHTD FlD �U C-2 CLlSIRQ'SW�'4IIY'�FUFA^' BY @.IEIE P.a"Li lM GTSAU V"5 `Fw'ND eEBu^p ^IIi flUhCS - ffiiN9u^Ni Y W:D. 1 VIS/95 F^cer.`a31®5-36 Pc+taed vZ15 1. Grit>ystan L�w t S, 00 5,000 2. A rt :-1er . nittlk, S)¢ -�Ml W1 S,0o0 31" 0. Se3WU C =l oe[ 3 im ^.698-0 21000 31t <. Cluenel Ai[31ae[s 51024b 80,000 60,600 S. w Liptas . Wl= M." 6. Oic .r Pipit'2tr11.':at rl= 10,000 t. Dwre[irt Sye InQ[oevtts W,OW W,000 S. Digs7[11.11 Sat idiutili[eclm =,o 1 1001000 9. fis;_cle Pnp S� 1ml, 140,000 10. E ,i®re MIM 51000 ll. S'.uplH 0c1 2A,000 a,= ]l. wt W r Ctaeiml It t Sys 10.000 WIM ll. Lretrom tim iipa ,mil RPta2aiett 501000 M,M 14. ^ D .lC wr Lifti J 7,000 1,000 3. 1k PL t tMmnm 5,000 410`0 16. teD Pirtl "Sa.+sity 150,= ]5 l= 17. P. bq L.µoa 100,000 1001000 19. !tiu. Db[Ca rol StA LiptenDmtim 150,000 150,000 1 19. !1Lse. SraL' L'lxtneatt prrjrr s )50 NO 50 000 `A 00' SC OJO ` lOPJ.PIA`C 1!0.`D.1 P2L5S �..15.000 390 000 ':9 Oltl 50.000 i @rrPu.CitIIa'! f£ By 92h111v o-x CfISA AND Qi 2 3L1!M MUfrsS DY PD.- I K :n No. AY 4 /85 .WA AND rv�x�:mz tsen PY1SY'6 -�Detm.,WR P:.:R�v. z 4/ui95 asar,n7v3 Lwss-e6 x��;�I 5;_gas W]A 6`r9G ,3ZII iHL^.fW FR4F:Q.K/ � SY 1. �plaertn: aluim f�ma at tie3dw_'cv 4 Pi-]39 51996-0 NI,mO t',YIO 2. avcclm wx, Pi_vltq IOs?attim aM R±Ieit Ma,mo Nu. ':•0 3. 5 iaty C ifiet ihir Lee1Ly m,000 m,m0 4. �y CLarifis Snsa Sprays 30,000 30,!,,: 5. L rued &vn G l;aau,at S�tla,C uli `A,mO So,000 6. —: Ped,ttrm, F®t t P.S. 151000 :S,wo g. rt Lfy Oretflo+'rtelr at Wttall m3 5,000 5.000 8. D+Flh ,act LtPtav . 50,000 50.000 9. Di9ctet PSPiq Ltpwu,ne,re m,m-. 50,m0 N. Digesat - tC Sluipa P.tga m,mS 501000 U. Dig,smt a.Ly Dei RYaSillaCim 350,m0 150,000 ' 12. sI,* P. IEat 95,m0 95,030 13. Rc I.S'ti Sm Satima Ma,mo Ma,mo i 14. W,,steti;q Sysa 1cpmAe: , RW-0, a898-0 1591000 159,m0 B. Dgire sw,Sys n 413alimtlm W'" 23.Om H. C, x fa Bait Aft, P 100 51966-0 401100 40,m0 17. Ne.-yct City Water lsuaenity m,000 30,m0 l8. Ic.,r.. Plat Want rysma 25,ma 25,m0 19. Leutat S..aM the Watt PiPitq E,mO 251000 M. a.»scan Kdiflmcias 55,000 551000 21. roe w r Cemlml'Iteaaa,t S,taa 101000 N,mO )2. Wr•c sviSoat fa A S¢.bbeta N,ma 101000 23. Y[ in,tm G 6ai ..r nula by ,,,t N,mo 10,Om 24. Digeater Gas a., Me "ibis fa' AQD Cmplla,m 150,m0 150.Om n. Dtaal ilel Pa,p at Cmeramr DAIditq 51.^.90-0 31000 3,000 X. Fab[imm mwvatic Smptaa 11000 7,000 n. smpter De =s SIB 29,om 291000 A. DR y Cates aC Pl t 21 Mu 251000 x5.000 29. (3ztdtail and DratLq L,Ptvene3,ts 210,000 200,000 W. fatl in as Sanity 30a,m0 301.000 31. Cpaatias Getter Dffim am Cmtelxm WaO, PA-ll2 R835-0 10,m0 N1000 32. S.Uiml Cmttol Lip [a 150,o00 150,mo 33. Fla,Coo ml m Svptlm 1 and 8 nwllo 1481m9 148,mo M. Iecetwm:a."1m LiPm . and Ilplsmeft 51833-0, 98J9�1 35. m,p,ar Ma,lmrirq Syat a 1 .ts 10,000 N,mo M. wawe faa hssrera, kw m S1B4"/-0 1a,m0 w OCO n. Misr. mbt�tttl states atd iaple,tnatlm 230,000 200,000 38. Misr. STai1 3nptvv .t Mj.ta aw m0 loo m0 10PJ, WAR 2l009tPTw� 312s m0 1 m9,Om 2,066,000 NO.mO W@ Ma tea;. vo !G A�sl¢rBIIc"ID! m.A'Z=- -x_::: f iY""Pf:.+T`DCJ.[:f6 L°✓ss .wised 5/:J95 K Y d5-% �.a .^$C7i JP.DFSNl/ N1 w`'dC 1. Fly Cates T SA. Rivet Dis , Wed E•000 x,000 2. Wtt Ps:L, Sbdr 95,000 B5.000 2. ! Lly 9- P+tfali E G Ity Per 4 f. Crizes.i ait Sisters at Au Slap `A•005 •+'.000 S. t sys E,0 x,doo S. t9tle 93 T 1 Tau:dtfimtims 'N,M -A,000 t. Pl t 2:m:'.pmeuais ]W,000 mo m S. H S LFfxaeiatt Sb ;.. =I= SO�WO 59.000 9. Oil (ytlt f:IDrCase.9:<.:eity Lipixen E,Wd IODS..AINf Q'41IIQS YJTpt PIUa.^S SN OOd 50 UJ9 49d.n00 PP:L4 RP..AY ICVWSC IV4 RBI f :SP 'NSffi l!rlr,-Sl 'W19B r119�3 I :'IIi9] I lYfi t' 'WI+• v,Cwv: ruts B 0.l[iJA a A:lYJi '/: 41.JD 65•IIB W] S Y'}.Jn IID.Sd'AC' lS]•6A,:/JCI 91.T19.J»I 113.1� 1::': S0.N.wI1A 1FVS U].mC 651Y ttD ,T,11`,tlp IIO.YIB.pAI Ii1.UB.b• 19J,T9.m111].L.O __m L h lim:ryi ry'm+:am :v:[ }• Iv3.5. ].9:S,.TA 1.::].tM IAS•pt] li5.pr v]'��¢::gn--Ici ]. 3[lue vLLl hmr.+:ry T1 o'vy::rl N,mG.m] NS.pY] i5,m0 `PrmO YArmC I.Ob.m B.mJ.fD I5.♦W,L% Sr4].yl :•.[la,'A ). C/4natic F�1!tu Ll e[V'va lr P>+1 LtiC.p» ].4JC,DJ SI' M1D �l,9 IINl GK FU O➢RGL'Tv u.n).9) li 1,b5.:D) ^:.m S).'AJ 1V.JA I.VArJ:p 5.'-04.$O :5.9]•✓n 15.6C.:r» �r.m B. M]iOi.W N[tD RCJZ� i LLv nt RnLL}�:W WF tm]mo [. Pimc l L Nuatb. Pl-D n,m,¢U STI.pG 4L•m 1.m.[Ol 6,pA.Ob II.Ob.ml i],Q\].(M t:m.m I.mJ.n» - ]).4T ]. WP�ou:T_naY'sLL¢lm S,U].1tl LJJ].W ]raJ,W1 Y/]rp» W:An f,.'Jr I. Rnwll:un�n.)-.s huiY palm I.li`.Jli F.i,].: M 1.ie:mul Jynw[Fsmrlmum LY:,T» lS,m pA l.pil.(IG LV.4Pq LICOrJS �:J'I 5.Ntl:[mr.oL)':mr m:.:um 4e•)•mJ 1.W Wt 1.89C,']l bCANV .':O,tt[ 6.Mrn[Im Syrwv Ial A+mn[n 1S'J.1q IW,O]1 )"J,Lm 11.,RV e: ¢rn"o�•it :[.v.....l. 1:M l'1mm M 1:a :omoo ME m.m r::B'a+):a°u 9. Lv hea-o P'urt'•L't< Syaa 1.Lt.4ti mrpJ] 1.4V:m SS].m ],JL)/)ti N. R'2m.Cm:a:Cra_vr:M'aa ",J.0.V rA•W WC.pD :'J.JL L1. llsv:a:R:LYL:[Y 1.AJ.JU 1.mJ,mC 'N'J.W1 1.)A.p» ll. Lpir)rt]R.q/C.iaw[lm P.v]c0 L»N m Cm T. m0 :T•,VA Sb^.p.'� % TC OD } !3 SI `:: Y•J ` l:» '.rR` Il LL :L)'M I,TS.tlA rr PLvx W. ] ' L Yalu.tt'J4`.rmnu pan AlAlmC »,RD E. xfultrua �'siy u](:.e p.i'n pan SY.roI l.g l 4 l . ]. J:9^•+=inrvlr-�e:.m.N :q w.rau 9rA]C•m m,3T: A,mO S,.b).JA I.GI,1tl lrlyd•pJl '.,:.JD 1. mrerc..al l+,•w IPiw„r:� s,w],a-J ,,,,;c,Jv is S. Smvhry 9ven,.e'a iev.uum ]tltl.GA h T LN.mO 60 W) 6.C#RnwlVmamw ll:RC,W] Wo Id15,ro] 8,325•Rfl ll,6'n,u]: 1. Rpsit a:nl g.xa.•[S+� m.ap :V.mC r].JJI 9:LTA:�n•htry irsnus noJrr:v ssrY�i).00 169.W. YV. `%CS`. 1.J».W )•NJ,W Wttal 3.)A.y 34'19N. N.9)J.m] � ].IiC.SC f9S W] 11 l)S SE � 9 9T YA 61 t ml •IA.tlA C C�_t_M Viettlr: a,f blrt I.Cmul Cuv X wyllfm Ta} m•m mrW] DJ.'JD 1. 6c+:a:4l.rar: 1r5CC:m 1M,2J 1. 1[Sill pw•et iu[:s L.SIC.OD Z:)r:W 919.DD 1rM.UC 9•RU•1V 13,RiJ.pb I},W].m mrp» Ji.;-£.Ll I. Im pW.]:rt]L�av,im ]rmC,RV llO,pJJ lm•mC 9]C•m 9Wm] :,'ti,'A] 5. Aful s..e[u.Wl'wy Pvarulm I.W,L`0 9]O,mC 1�6m.m] E,':/i.p� 6. Ra:r. P.V ilium lc�wv.l.�.la 1},(Y9.roJ �m LL•mJ.V^ ': slY(.Vr G 9ylm mJ Pt m� ].RR 1C LlvM.. humII.Cw'M IS MU LM. WM., Sl.l�.v: SMOY.- CR:1 I 139.XJ.'M 6 Sll pTr TJ RH Vll 9 SA m ]�itl RU @ S]J R» D IIq Rtl I! 4O m ' ,.'Ili ¢z�.lau GW ul Ro)mu T e. Rr_'.oi:m PM[No I 8.11}.Gtl SS.Up 1.161.p2 him 1,(W,W l•JD.M} I,JID•Sn LS].W L(W,JP it }.JG 6 rw[m••e`brtW E 11,110•fM SI],Ry ],1] E ],imC LS»•ttt' Lmrm .m.rY?` },YA.m G Lb�uc�^InNav pin[Pa:llltlw 6.9]S.m ilC.mC 1,n]rCA lrmJ•WJ I.m].[W I,WJ,W 1,J>1 E LpJ)rJ9 e. P1..N:pl xq to 15),0» L1,m0 156,Y,N Y..R➢ 5'rl:m O'lbai/ 'L,pA EH.tiI .Rll Sal:x .^.eu�'rn: s`.C:s�W ho)a-v VC.m W.IX9 WrmJ NC•W LT.0.tl LN.JA i '�V,Y, G. [reifaanuur nW V:'clrvv IDJ.,mattG SV,M1A Yr.mt SJ.J]J Sl.1V b)r(LO [>J.'[C b)s: C a Se{r .'m•Po,I..c+ l�l''oW 1n:mmC dI,OWN him R rva: ri' :9 er1 Cn[.�il L'F�rand J.q=T :O]L[p _ YC�DD Sp•1¢.V.- I^lal 6•U1.0➢ I LL9LB# LSa.Q» 1.W.0}l Ib,JA ]S)rJD ID],OA' 0 G S.ir1.9L RI• .b.:T'P ttIIID f)1] "S 9l.Nrl,ppTB.n},p» 3".,1]}.19JIIi.L". ]!�LW p» 9 :1]YA %.TO,T] •,.Y,p» 6:.)Y,ml M.UI.T: 15. .1._rl _4'+ b:Ar2l0[NVI RHNU 6),)IIrNJ S.Ndrm] I!IL nLLGJI IiI.S:I,LMI IS:.Sli.JYII'Zi.O]1,3gILL+d.9:L:M