Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-04-10COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE CEUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAYJ April 3, 1985 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 10, 1985 -7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 ·and 13 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: DISTRICT 5 ADJOURNED MEETING -Wednesday, April 17th at 5:00 p.m at Newport Beach City Hall FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE -Tuesday, April 23rd at 4:30 p.m. TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE -Wednesday, April 24th at 5:30 p.m. April May June July August September October November December January February March April COUNTY SANITATION DIS'ffllCTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-i~ £714) 540-2910 C714J 962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings Apr 10, 1985 Apr 24, 1985 May 8, 1985 May 22, 1985 Jun 12, 1985 Jun 26, 1985 Jul 10, 1985 Jul 24, 1985 Aug.14, 1985 None Scheduled Sep 11, 1985 Sep 25, 1985 Oct 9, 1985 Oct 23, 1985 ~ Nov 13, 1985 None Scheduled Dec 11, 1985 None Scheduled Jan 8, 1986 Jan 22, 1986 Feb 12, 1986 Feb 26, 1986 Mar 12, 1986 Mar 26, 1986 Apr 9, 1986 Apr 23, 1986 .ll _ BOARDS OF DIRECTORS r. "'· ._.. , County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 r II """"" ~ of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 • AGENDA MEETING DATE APRIL lOJ 1985 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEMJ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITIONJ STAFF · WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:00 P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation ( 2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda '(6) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: Q District 1 -March 13, 1985, regular District 2· -March 13, 1985, regular ' District 3 -March 13, 1985, regular and April 4, 1985, adjourned (Copy will be placed in Directors' meeting folders) District 5 -March 13, 1985, regular District 6. -March 13, 1985, regular District 7 -March 13, 1985, regular District 11 -March 13, 1985, regular District 13 -March 13, 1985, reg\llar (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel .· (8) ALL DISTRICTS Conside~ation of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be . r·egarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See pa~e(s) "A" and "B" ALL DISTRICTS ·Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - Joint Working Capital Fund Self-Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICT NO. 13 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT 3/06/85 $ 429,576.05 606,266.30 55,693.80 3,793.10 12,527.14 261,012.03 506.62 40.86 6,072.25 1,222.23 20,448.67 4,412.08 $1,401,571.13 Q)NSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9(a) THROUGH 9(j) _3/20/85 $ 514,562.10 1,192,512.35 91,774.00 2,332.18 16.31 5,290.80 13,368.93 10,257.18 7,616.01 6,302.65 $1,844,032.51 (9) AL DISTRICTS All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for r~solutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed fran the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same • . -2- .--4/10/85 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (a) (1) Consideration of motion approvinq Chanqe Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Pavinq and Drainaqe at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, authorizinq an add.ition of $16,998.70 to the contract with Frank qltimo, General Buildinq Contractor, for removal of shrubs and other debris, fillinq in of the low regions between·· the Districts' southern property line and the Santa Ana River trail, additional surveying, installation of additional pipinq, repair of irrigation line and replacement of damaqed fencing. See paqe "C" (2) Consideration of motion approving Chanqe Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Pavinq and Drainaqe at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, authorizing an adjustment of enqineer's quantities for a total addition of $14,409.10 to the contract with Frank Ultimo, General Buildinq Contractor. See paqe "D" (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-61, acceptinq Pavinq and Drainaqe at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "E" (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Waste Gas Burners at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-121, authorizing an addition of $9,690.00 to the contract with Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, for additional work and delays relative to installation of new waste gas burners pending receipt of AQMD's approval, and granting a time extension of 270 calendar days for completion of said additional work and for said delays incurred. See paqe "Fn (c) (1) Consideration of motion approving Chanqe Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, for miscellaneous job modifications, resulting in a reduction of work relative to precasting sections of concrete, and for additional excavation, beddinq and asphaltic concrete pavinq, for a net total addition of $10,874.30 to the contract with Thibodo Construction Company, and granting a time extension of 43 calendar days for construction of the precast concrete sections. See paqe "G" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-62, accepting Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See paqe "H" -3- 4/10/85 . -... (9) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (d) (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, authorizing an addition of $28,778.52 to the contract with Advanco ~ Constructors, Inc. for 18 items of misc~llaneous modifications and additional work required including costs resulting from additional equipment required and delays incurred in order to comply with AQMD requirements. See page "I" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-63, accepting Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "J" (e) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee Certification re final negotiate~ fee with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers re Agreement for design of Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-23R, Rehabilitation of Primary Basins 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-24R, and Rehabilitation of Primary Basins A, B, C, H, I, J, K, L, and Mat Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R. See page "K" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-64, approving Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for design of Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-23R, Rehabilitation of Primary Basins 3, 4 and 5 at ~ Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-24R, and Rehabilitation of Primary Basins A, B, C, H, I, J, K, L, and Mat Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R, and for construction support services in connection therewith, on an hourly-rate basis including labor, plus overhead, direct expenses, profit, and soils investigation services, for a total amount not to exceed $325,400.00. See page "L" (f) Consideration of motion to receive .and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of Liquid Cationic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Flocculent, Specification No. P-075, to Allied Corporation, Chemical Sector, for the price of $.0552 per wet pound for a total amount not to exceed $748,801.00 for a one-year period commencing April 12, 1985. See page "M" (g) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Laboratory Services Contract for Analyses of Industrial Wastewater, 1985 Specification No. S-023, to Brown and Caldwell Analytical Services in an amount not to exceed $41,890.00 for a one-year period commencing April 15, 1985. See page "N" (h) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim for damages submitted by the estate of former employee Christopher - Gunsul, dated March 26, 1985, and refer to the Districts' General~ Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. See page "O" -4- -,,. 9) 4/10/85 DISTRICT 2 (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-70-2, approving and authorizing execution of a Pipeline License Agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for right-of-way required in connection with construction of the Fullerton-Brea (Purchase) Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-25, and author~zing payment of $250 in accordance with the provisions of said Pipeline License Agreement. See page "P" DISTRICT 3 (j) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, authorizing the addition of miscellaneous items of work and the deletion of others resulting in a net deduction of $940.90 from the contract with Mike Prlich and Sons. See page "Q" END OF CDNSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from consent calendar, if any -5- 4/10/85 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Interim Report of the Building Conunittee dated March 21, 1985. (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (2) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Conunittee to solicit proposals from qualified architectural/engineering firms and to negotiate a contract for design and construction services for the proposed Administration Building Addition at Plant No. 1 (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Conunittee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of motion approving the addition of a Y-Rating policy to the personnel regulations1 and consideration of Resolution No. 85-65, amending Resolution No. 79-21, as amended, providing for rules and regulations re terms and conditions of employment, to include said Y-Rating policy. See page "R" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-66, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1985 Summer Work Program for painting and grounds maintenance work. See page "S" (c) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the Lighting Energy Conservations Studies for Plants Nos. 1 and 2, dated December 3, 1984, prepared by John Carollo Engineers C.2> Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a contract for design and installation of a lighting energy management system at Plants 1 and 2 (d) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Digester Gas Utilization Study, dated March 1985, prepared by John Carollo Engineers (2) Consideration of motion amending the 1983 Master Plan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities to include separate Central Power Generation Facilities at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, as recommended in the Digester Gas Utilization Study (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-67, approving the Second Amendment to the Amended Joint Powers Agreement Creating an Agency to be Known as the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, providing for extension of the Districts' membership in said agency from July 1, 1985 to June 30, 1988 and increasing the annual contribution from member agencies from a maximum of $600,000 to $700,000 (The Districts' estimated annual contribution would be $140,000) See page "T" (EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE items continued on next page) -6- . -.. 4/10/85 (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee (Continued from page 6): (f) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the March 21, 1985 Staff Report and Recomlliendations for Contract O.cean Monitoring Services required in connection with the Districts' new NPDES Permit, and to approve the procedures and time schedule for engaging a firm to conduct said monitoring program, as set forth in said report (g) Consideration of action on items relative to the Non-Industrial Toxic Source Control Program required by the Districts' NPDES Permit: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the Non-Industrial Toxic Source,Control Program Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan dated March 1985, and to approve the conceptual program (2) Consideration of motion directing the General Manager to include funding for said program in ~he annual budget, beginning with the 1985-~6 fiscal year, in an amount up to $100,000 (3) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to appoint a staff member to the post of Toxics Coordinator to implement and administer the program (14) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee re all-risk and excess liability policy renewals (Committee is meeting on April 4th to review insurance matters and will submit its recommendations on the following items at the Board meeting) (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to place all-risk insurance coverage, including earthquake and flood protection, effective April 14, 1985, for an estimated annual premium of $ , as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee, as follows: Facilities Covered: Limits of Coverage: Deductibles: Earthquake $ ___ _ Flood Other (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to place excess liability coverage effective April 14, 1985, for an estimated annual premium of $ , as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 85-68 and Resolution No. 85-69, urging the California Legislature to adopt Senate Bills 75 and 639, respectively, relating to limitation of liability for public agencies -7- 4/10/85 (15) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Public hearing on Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan: (Executive Summary of Draft EIR mailed to Directors on 3/6/85) (1) Open hearing (2) Verbal report from EIR consultant, K. P. Linds~rom, Inc. (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments relative to the Draft EIR, if any (4) Consideration of oral comments, if any (5) Close hearing (b) Considerat-ion of motion directing the EIR consultant to address the oral public hearing comments and any written comments recieved on the Draft Environmental Impact Report and to prepare a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan after the close of the written public comment period on May 1, 1985 ( 16) ALL DISTRICTS Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT l Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT l Consideration of motion to adjourn (19) DISTRICT 2 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (21)-DISTRICT 3 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 . Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT .6 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- i-• 4/10/85 (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (29) DISTRICT 13 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 11 Status report of General Counsel relative to proposed agreement with Wilmore City Development Company for defer~ed payment of connection fees for the Breakers Apartment complex in the City of Huntington Beach. See page "U" (32) DISTRICT 11 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- ' - MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date April 10, 1985 -7:30 p.rn. Post Office Bo x 8 127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley , Calif ., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a ·brief explanation of the nore important, non- ·routine items v.bich appear on the enclosed agenda and v.bich are not other- wise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material surrmarizing the bills paid since the last Joint B:Jard meeting . To minimize the arrount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda rnaterial and reduce the number of romnents in the Manager 's Rer::ort, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself , particularly with regard to change orders and contracts v.bich have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer's estirrate . Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being r ecarmended for award. ALL DIS'IR IC'IS No . 9 Ca) : Approval of Olange Orders No. 2 and ID . 3 to Paving and Drainage at Trea bren t Plant No • 2 , Job No. FW-119; and Acceptance of Job as Canplete. Cl> Change Order No. 2: Olange Order No. 2 adds $16,998.70 to the rontract. 'Ihe \o.Drk included rerroval of shrubs and other debris and fi lling in of the low regions in the area bet~n the Districts' southern property line and the Santa Ana River Trail in order to eliminate standing water in the area , v.bich otherwise rould produce odors and nnsquito problems . Other items include the replacement of a broken six-inch valve at a pipe saddle on an existing irrigation line , insulation of a t~-inch electrical ronduit from the existing warehouse to the new planter area for future lighting, additional surveying needed to change grade and road ele- vations, installation of an additional 50 feet of piping to drain the west side of Road A, repair of a PVC irrigation line and replacement of 45 feet of fencing at the southVA2st corner of the Plant No . 2 property line, which had been danaged by vandals . April 10, 1985 (2) Change Order No . 3 : Olange Order No . 3 is an adjustrrent of engi- neer's quantities to accurately reflect the rraterials used in construction of this contract. It increases the quantities for asi;:haltic concrete paving for a total addition of $14 ,409.10. Staff reC'Onmends approval of Olange Orders No . 2 and No . 3 to the cxmtract or. '!here is no tirre extension associated with these change orders . (3) Closeout: 'Ihe contractor , Frank Ultirro , General Building Contractor , has fulfilled all C'Ontractual obligations within the specified and authorized tirre extensions to perform the work for pavi ng and drainage at Treatment Plant No. 2 , Job No . PW-119. The staff reC'Onmends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda rraterial authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final closeout agreement and fi ling of the Notice of Cbmpletion as required. '!here were three change orders to this C'Ontract (including Olange Order No . 2 and 3 al:X)ve) totaling $36,813.04 for a f i nal arrended C'Ontract price of $179 ,584.94. No . 9 C b) : Approval of Olange Order No • 1 to Waste Gas Burners at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No . PW-121. Excess digester gas Cover Y.bat is used to fuel our engines and boilers) produced as a by-product of the sewage treatment process is flared at both plants . '!his project is to replace the existing burners at Plant l'b. 2 with rrore efficient equiprrent. However , during the course of the contract it J:ecame necessary to have the contractor delay his work until the rreans of canplying with recently enacted ACMD Rule 431.1 , Y.bich limits the allowable sulfur content of digester gas, were resolved and an AQ"vm permit is issued . In Mardi, the Boards awarded a contract for installation of facilities to canply with Rule 431 .1, and ACMD has now r esurred processing of the waste gas burner permit . The \YC>rk involved delaying the installation of new waste gas burners and reinstallation of the old gas burners p:nding the A<:MD approval . 'Ihe Districts will rntify the contractor once ACMD approval has teen received to disassemble the old gas burners and r esurre installation of the new waste gas burners . The staff r eC'Orrcre.nds approval of Olange Order No . 1 adding $9,690 .00 and 270 days to the contract. "No . 9 ( c) : Approval of Qlange Order No . 1 to Supplerren tal Repair of Bushard Trunk -Phase II, Job No . I-2R-2A; and Acceptance o f Job as Complete. 1. Change Order No. 1: Olange Order No. 1 adds $10, 874. 30 plus 43 calendar days to the C'Ontract. '!here are two deduction items of work and one addition for a net addition of $10,874.30 . 'Ihe two reductions r elate -2- ~ ' c' • • April 10, 1985 to allowing the contractor to pre-cast concrete support sections that were originally specified to have l::een poured in place. A cost reduction was negotiated in the arrount of $6,000 for this work. 'Ihe precasting of the structures, while less costly and less disruptive to the public at the site, did require a 43-calendar day time extension. -The third item on the Change Order is an addition of $16,874.30. 'Ihe pipe bedding was unstable soil instead of rock and gravel as · indicated on the original as-b..lilt construction drawings. In order to insure the proper support l::ese, the staff directed the contractor to excavate t'M8 feet deeper than shown on the contract drawings and replace the unstable soil with 3/ 4-inch rock. 'Ibis also required additional asftlal tic concrete paving due to the deeper excavation. The staff recorrrrends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $10,874.30 and 43 days to the contract. 2. Closeout: 'Ihe contractor, 'Ihibodo Construction Company, has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and authorized time extensions to perform supplerrental repairs on the Bushard Trunk. The staff reconnends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda rnaterial authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final closeout agreerrent and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. 'Ihere was one Change Order to this contract (Olange Order No. 1 above) totaling $10,874.30 for a final amended contract price of $230,874.30. No. 9(d): Ai;:proval of Change Order No. 8 to Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks, Job No. P2-25-2; and Acceptance of Job as Canplete. 1. Change Order No. 8: 'Ihis change order covers 18 items of Y<Drk and adds $28, 778.52 to the contract. 'Ihe ma.jor cost items include repair of existing discharge piping on sewage pumps; substitution of rraterials on the overflow line to avoid a rnajor plant shutdown and installation of threadports on each of the exhaust pipes for Engines No. 1 and 3 to faci- litate testing of catalytic converters as required by Ac,MD; costs of delay in the start up of the engines in order to comply with AC:MD requirerrents; installation of crotor control starters on pre-lube pumps; and changes in pump control panel hardware to accorrcrodate the new magnetic rreters l:eing installed under separate contract. The staff reconnends approval of Change Order No. 8 adding $28, 778.52. 2 • Closeout: 'I.be Contractor, Advance Constructors, Inc. , has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified tirre to perform the work for the Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks. -3- April 10 I 1985 The staff r eo::>rnnends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda rraterial authorizing acceptance of the ~rk as complete, execution of the final closeout agreement and filing of the NJtice of Completion as required . '!here were eight Olange Orders to this o::>ntract totaling $93,864.73 for a final arrended o::>ntract price of $3,303,864 .73. No. 9(e): Approve Selection Cbrrmitte Certification and Award Contract to Lee and Ro, ())risulting Engineers for Design of Primary Basin Rehabilitation Plants No. 1 and NJ . 2 . . In order to expedite the provision of the Boards' recen tly adopted policy for odor mitigation rreasures to cover the primary sedim=ntation basins , the staff is recomnending that the planned rehabilitation of the rewaining b3.sins l:e accepted as soon as fOSsible . '!his rehabilitation work must l:e completed l:ef ore the b3.s ins can l:e o::>vered • Work includes rebuilding the b3.sins with new fil:erglass raffles, weirs, and o::>llection mechanisms, performing necessary concrete repairs , piping revisions, painting and electrical work . It also includes the replacement of Pri.rrary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant NJ. 1 . The Selection Carrnittee has negotiated a fee with Lee and Ro for tl1e ~rk. Lee and Ro is the consulting engineering firm that has recently designed the fi r st t~ i;:hases of our budgeted sedirentation rehabilitation program. Because they canpleted the rather intensive l earning curve involved in this type of effort , they can rrost efficiently perform this third and final fhase . A fee has l:een negotiated b3.sed on labor and overhead plus direct costs , soils investigations and profit for a maximum arrount not to exceed $325, 400, 'i.hich includes funding for construction support services. The project will l:e divided into three separate construction contracts as follows: (1) Job NJ. Pl-23R -ReplaC'ell'ent of Prirrary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant l'b . 1 (2) Job l'b . Pl-24R -Rehabilitation of Prirrary Basins 3 , 4, and 5 at Plant NJ . 1 (3) Job NJ . P2-31R -Rehabil itation of Pri.rrary Basins A, B, C, H, I, J, K, L , and Mat Plant NJ. 2 Actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and f ile the Selection carrnittee 's Certification of the f inal negotiated fee for the above ~rk and adoption of a resolution approving an agreeernr:t with 1 Lee and.Ro consulting Engineers to perform the necessary design worK for ~r~r~ basin rehabilitation , Plants NJs. 1 and 2. Copies of the Cert1flcat1on and Resolution are attached wi th the supf_X)rting documents . -4- April 10, 1985 No. 9(f): Award Specification No. P-075, Liquid Cationic Polyelectrolyte Olemical Flocculent. The Districts use a polyelectrolyte chemical flocculent (polyrrer) to aid in the treat.Trent and dewatering of sludge. '!he current contract for supplying this material is expiring and bids for a ne w contract have been solicited. '!he proposed contract contains an option to .renew fo r up to four one-year pericds under mutually-agreeable terms . The staff has conducted trials on the various liquid or special emulsion polyrrers under our specific operating conditions to enable an evaluation of the bids to determine the overall lowest cost base d on per- formance rather than unit cost , which is not necessarily consistent with the lowest unit cost. Seven vendors prcducts were tried and five were prequalified for bidding. Bids w::re received on March 26th. Based on an estimated one-year polyrrer requirerrent to treat 80,000 dry tons of sludge, Allied Corporation, Olemical Sector is the low bidder at a total estimated annual cost of $748,001 .00. 'Ihe bids ranged to a high of $1,798,000. '!he Districts are currently paying $0. 75 per wet pound for polyrrer, thus the low bid represents an approximate 25% reduction in cost to the Districts over the current contract. The staff recorrmends the contract be awarded to Allied Corporation, Chemical Sector , the low bidder, in an arrount not to excee d $748,801 .00 plus applicable sale s tax, for a one-year r:ericd comne ncing April 12, 1985 . No. 9(g): Awarding Contract for Laboratory Services for Anal ys e s of Industrial Wastewater, 1985 Specification N'.:>. S-023. The Industrial Waste Division (IWD) routinely samples app r oximatel y 500 permittees for toxic substances and high concentration of biochemi c al oxygen derrand and suspended solids. In addition, special proje cts and studie s are conducted by the IWD to identify, and trace toxic subs t ances . This rronitoring and analyse s 'M'.)rk has increased substantially as a r e sult of EPA's Categorical Pretre atnient Standards. In addition, the Districts ' requirerrents to analyze the influent and effluent stre ams of i t s tre atrrent facilities have been significantly increased by the new NPDES permi t . This arrounts to ove r 11,000 analyses per year. To date , rro s t of the laboratory analyse s for special project s and routine rronitoring have been by the Districts' Laboratory Di v ision. However, the Districts ' Labora tory i s not currently equipped to ana l y ze all of the priority pollutants in the above rre ntioned waste stre ams and i s in the proce s s of oodg e ting the personne l and equipm211t needed to ferform the additional testing r e quired. '!he adde d s taffing and instrurrentation is propose d to be included in the 1985-86 budg e t, which is now unde r review by the Boards ' Fiscal Policy Cornnittee . In the inte rim, a Contract laboratory is needed for the pericd of about one year to colle ct these -5- April 10 , 1985 necessary samples and analyze for priority poll utants by gas dlranatografh/mass spectroscopy CGCMS), atomic absorption (AA) and other required instrurrentation. 'Ihe need to perfonn these services is based upon a requirerrent for a quick "turn-around" ti.TIE, as a back-up laboratory for the Districts' Lal:oratory Divison, and the perfonnance of specialized analyses for certain o::xnpounds . Requests for proposals were solicited from six firms qualified to conduct these analyses. 'l\..D firms resp:mded with the proposals and staff recorrmends award to Brown and Caldwell Analytical Services in the esti- mated bid of $41,890 as the low bid for a one-year oontract. No • 9 ( h ) : Receive , File and Deny Claim for Darrages by Es ta te of Christoi;:her Gunsel . Attadled to the agenda material is a reoonnendation from the General Counsel that a claim alleging damages in the arrount of $5 mill ion filed by the estate of former employee, Olristor.tier Gunsel, be denied and referred to his office and the Districts' Claims Administrator . DIS'IRICT ID. 2 No. 9(i): Approval of Execution of a Pipeline License Agreerrent re Full erton-Brea (Purchase) Relief Trunk, Cbntract tb. 2-25. Currently I.owry 'and Associates is designing the Fullerton-Brea (Purchase) Relief Trunk Sewer v.bich is to be constructed from the inte r- section of Orangethorpe and Euclid Avenues easterly along alignments in Orangethorpe Avenue, Highland Avenue, and Harbor Boulevard to approxi- mately the intersection of Brea BJulevard and Evergreen Avenue. It is anticipated that plans and specifications will be presented to the Board of Directors for approval in September of this year. The project requires the installation of a portion of the sewer within the Atchison, Topeka, Santa Fe Railway Ccrnpany right-of-way, \>.him requires the execution of a pipeline license agreerrent. 'Ihe processing of the agreerrent inclooes payrrent of a $250 fee. 'Ihe license agreerrent includes certain construction requirerrents and assurances to the Railway Canpany. The staff reconnends execution of the pipeline license agreerrent and payrrent of the $250 fee . DISTRICT ID. 3 No. 9(j): Approval of Olange Order tb. 2 to Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Cbntract l\b. 3-28R. Change Order tb. 2 is a net deduction of $940. 90 from the contract plus a t~-calendar day tirre extension. Several items of ~rk were -6- r . ' , . April 10, 1985 included in this change order including rrodif ications of the re(X)nstruc- tion methods on several of the manholes resulting in an overall reduction in costs. Staff recomnends approval of olange Order t\b. 2 to Contract No. 3-28R for a net deduction of $940.90 and an addition of two calendar days . ALL DIS'IR ICT3 No. 11: Rep:?rt of the Building Ccmnittee. The Cannittee rret on March 21, 1985 and enclosed, for Board rremters is a written refX)rt of their discussions and recomrended actions for (X)nsideration by the Boards . Nos • 12 and 13: Rep:?rt of the Executive Ccmni ttee • The Conmittee net on March 27, 1985 and enclosed for Board rremters is a written refX)rt of their discussions and recomrended actions for (X)nsideration by the Boards. No .. 14: Rep:?rt of the Fiscal Policy Canmi ttee re Insurance Matters. As discussed in the Executive Conmittee Rep:?rt, the Fiscal Policy Conmittee has been r eviewing the status of the Districts' all-risk prop- erty and excess liability insurance p:?licies. The Districts' insurance broker, Richard P. Beckendorf, Coast Insurance Agency, rrade a presentation to the Fiscal Policy Corrmittee on March 26th and the Executive Cornnittee on March 27th, regarding the rapidly changing insurance rrarketplace and its impact on the renew-al of our all-risk property coverage and our excess public liability (X)Verage. Both our all-risk property (X)verage and the initial fX)rtion of our excess liability coverage require r enew-al by April 14, 1985. In the case of the all-risk property coverage, whim presently insures all of our facilities and equipnent up to $150,000,000 against such hazards as earth- quake, flood, fire or theft, the p:?licy expires on April 14, 1985, and various of o ur existing i;::ool of carriers have advised us they will not renew our (X)Verage. Th e p:?licy year for the initial $900,000 of our existing $21,000,000 excess liability coverage was from July 1, 1984 through June 30, 1985, but in mid-February the Districts and our broker were notified that one of the two companies providing th is (X)Verage intended to cancel its p:?rtion effective April 14, 1985. Mr. Beckendorf p:?inted out the major underwriting losses exper i enced throughout the insurance industry over the past five years, indicated that rrany insurers are unwilling to accept new coverage due to lack of capa- city, and advised that in many instances, corrpanies are cancelling existing levels of coverage. He also fX)inted out the "deep pocket" refX)rt on insurance premiums for public agencies. -7- April 10, 1985 Following the report, the Executive Corrrnittee directed the Fiscal Policy Corrrnittee to take the following steps and report l:E.ck to the Joint Boards at the regular April 10th rreeting • Direct the Districts' insurance broker to continue to seek qu:>ta- tions regarding both typ;=s of coverage as originally restricted by the staff . To rreet again prior to the April 10, 1984 ITEeting of the Joint Boards to review additional quJtations being solicited by our broker and subni t a recomnendation to the Joint Boards regarding acquisition of appropriate all-risk property and excess liability insurance coverage for the Districts for the next year . --'!hat, cx:>nsidering the long lead tirre necessary to place all-risk property mverage, direct the Districts insurance broker to attempt to place the coverage at the maximum limits obtainable (estinated to be $75 ,000 ,000), with the understanding that at the April 10, 1985 meeting of the Joint S:Ja.rds , the Directors, at their discretion, could reduce the level of coverage to a lesser arrount if deerred desirable. The General Counsel will also subni t a report to the Fiscal Policy Canmittee for their mnsideration and recorrmendation on pending bills in the California I.e:Jislature relating to limitation of liability for public agencies. The Fiscal Po licy Carmittee will subnit its report and reconmendation on insurance matters to the Boards at wednesday's ITEeting. No. 15: Public Hearing re Draft EIR for the Joint 'l'reatrrent ~brks Was tewater Master Plan. Last rronth the Boards fixed April 10, 1985 as the tirre and place for public hearing on the Draft EIR for the Joint Treatment ~rks Wastewater Master Plan. A representative of K. P . Lindstrom and Associat es , the Environmental Consultant that prepared the EIR, will review the Draft EIR at the hearing. A duplicate copy of the Executive Sumnary is enclosed with the agenda package for active Directors. Following the hearing, the mnsultant should be directed to address the oral hearing corrments and any written corrrrents received and to prepare the Final EIR after the close of the official public C'OlllTtent period on May 1, 1985. '!he Final EIR will then l:e subnitted to the Directors for consideration at a sub.sequent Boa~d meeting (tentatively scheduled f o r June 12th). If any Board rremters have questions concerning the DEIR or wish a cx:>py of the full DEIR , please call staff rrembers Tero Dawes or Hilary Baker at 714-540-2910. -8- ,. # ... April 10, 1985 DISTRICT NJ . 11 No. 31 : Status Report re Proposal 1"9reerrent with Wilrrore Developrrent for Deferred Paynent of Connection Fees . Attached to the agenda supporting documents ·is a rrerrorandum from the General Counsel on the status of the proposed agreement with Wilrrore City Developnent Conpany for deferred payrrent of District Connection f ees in the anount of $427 ,500 . Mr. vrndruff will up:late the Board at the rreeting . -9- --~r :• .~GENDA ITEM #11 March 22, 1985 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of OR ANGE COUNTY. CALIF ORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENU E FOUNTA IN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 17141 5 40-2910 171 4 ) 962-2411 REPORT OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE BUILDING COMMITTEE: Present: Norman E. Culver, Chairman Richard E. Buck James Neal Richard Partin Charles Sylvia Absent: Carrey Nelson Sal Sapien Gene Wisner Convene: Adjourn: 5:30 p.m . 6:30 p.m. March 21, 1985 Others Present: Richard B. Edgar, Joint Chairman Don R. Griff in, Vice Joint Chairman Staff Present: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Tom Dawes, Deput y Chief Engineer Gary Streed, Chief Admininstrative Assistant SECOND INTERIM REPORT BACKGROUND The Building Committee was convened in October 198 3 to study the Districts' administrative office and laboratory space requir e ments for both existing and future staffing levels. The members toured the Administration Building and concluded that the space utilization was very congested and inefficient, in that areas had been converted to uses other than that for which they were originally designed, to accommodate personnel and computer equipment. The Committee also re v iewed staffing projections and determined a need fo r added wo r k space to meet future requirements of the Districts expanding activities. Attached are copies of plot plans and staffing projections reviewed by the Committee. -1- Consideration of additional laboratory space requirements has been held in abeyance pending a determination of the monitoring program _, bein~ imposed by EPA and RWQCB pursuant to the Districts' new NPDES Permit. LABORATORY SPACE REQUIREMENTS Staff has reported that the Districts' new NPDES Permit will require an extensive ocean monitoring program, as well as additional plant monitoring. However, because the final program has not been fully defined by the EPA, staff has recommended that consideration of laboratory space requirements continue to be held in abeyance. When the monitoring requirements are defined, the Districts can determine which elements of the program will be conducted in-house and which will be contracted for with outside firms. This determination will dictate the laboratory space requirements. The NPDES Permit has been approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and by the EPA Administrator. Definition of the monitoring program is expected to be completed during the next few months. ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SPACE REQUIREMENTS After a review of the anticipated long and short term needs, the ...., Committee decided on a two-phase approach to resolve the added space requirements of the Administration Off ice: Phase I -Building Modifications for Temporary Off ice Space In order to satisfy immediate space requirements, certain interim measures were recommended to better utilize the existing floor space. The upstairs conference/training room, containing approximately 1300 square feet, was converted to off ice use. A trailer was then purchased and placed in the parking area immediately west of the Administration Building to provide a temporary conference/training facility. In addition to the above interim modifications of the Administration Building, temporary modifications to the old warehouse building which now houses the industrial waste inspectors was approved. These modifications will provide off ice space for new inspectors being hired to enforce the Districts' Industrial Waste Ordinance. These above modifications, previously authorized by the Boards to be completed by force account for an amount not to exceed $52,000, will satisfy the office space requirements until a permanent addition can be designed and constructed. The permanent addition is proposed as Phase II. -2- .--.. Phase II -Permanent Office Space Addition Based on the current staffing levels and anticipated future personnel requirements, it is projected that the number of employees occupying the Administration Building will almost double, from the current level of 54 to 103, over the next ten years. The Committee concluded that this demand, coupled with the need to alleviate the congestion in the existing building would require an appro x imate increase of 15,000 square feet of office · space. The preliminary cost estimate is $2,000,000. The Committee has held several meetings to consider the Phase II permanent office space addition. The Committee, bas~d on its studies, directed staff to prepare a scope of work for architectural services for the Administration Building addition. The scope of work considers the design of a two-story addition (and the practicality of a basement) including a new or improved Board Room, as a new wing to the east side of the Administration Building, adjacent to the existing Board Room (see plot plan) . It is anticipated that the office addition would be ready for occupancy in about a year and a half as follows: Project Report and Building Comm. Review 120 days Design-Preliminary 75 days Design-Final 40 da~s Sub-Total 235 days Construction 240 days Total 475 days SELECTION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Building Committee recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized to solicit proposals from qualified architectural/ engineering firms and to negotiate a contract for consideration by the Joint Boards for planning, design and construction services for the Administration Building Addition at Plant 1. The Committee has further recommended to the Joint Chairman that he expand the Selection Committee membership to include three members of the Building Committee in addition to the Joint Chairman and the Vice Joint Chairman. The Boards approved Selection Committee procedures grant the the Joint Chairman this authority and he has concurred with the Building Committee's recommendation. -3- ENGINEERING PERSCllNEL STORAGE 1984 17 --- 3 years 7* + 2 400 5 years 2 50 : 10 years 2 50 TOTAL ADDITION 13 500 1984 ADMINI S TRATION/ENGIN (p~ING BUILDING STUDY Staffing Pro j ection s OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL WASTE ACCTG & FINANCE PERSONNEL STORAGE PERS ONNEL STORAGE PER SONNEL STORAGE 5 ---5 ---11 --- --200 7* + 4 400 2 +550 --50 3 50 2 +300 --50 4 50 j +400 300 18 500 ' 7 1250 -- 6/20/81' MAINT. MGMT PERSONNEL PERSONNEL 7 9 2 5 --2 --2 2 9 *Existing Personnel, now in temporary quarters outside building. NEW EMPLOYEE SUMMARY Admin/Engrg: 14* + 35 = 49 ADMINISTRATION/ENGINEERING BUILDING SIZE ESTIMATES 1. Employee Work Space: 2. Ha l ls, Walls, etc. 3. Storage, Records Vaults, Computer Space 4. Stairs 5. Employee Rooms 6. Restrooms (2 sets) 7. Conference/Auditor's Rooms (2) Total 6,630 1, 560 2 ,550 700 400 800 1,400 14,040 ( ( (. .. ~i,.t.,1 t:::, ~-..1e;N u e. l~of'os~o fet'lP~~A~'( f~IL-~f<--""=> . ®-®©~ ~ ~ ~ r~fb&~ .b-r?t11tJ1~·n~-~TION ~ ~ \(C>J ~LJ I &,c:> 1t"G ~ 0OJ1101'1""1 1CJ:Y •• ~ ~~ 2nJ t&1t>ft'( r'Ar<-frfloNS. 1s :L_ ~~nt-1<0 e.~a.n·ha.e~1t.Jcc. At-IP "Rr11t41~PA11"N ___.. ~LJlvPIN~ t!.:i< ~'f I tJ a;. ~ I \.A.!l>0~10~'1 --n-=. t1 (\of 451 ~ t;( r~~TrTION © ef9 ~ .s.., I f"fZD~ l"-P~· .,.l'isf G fl"-.~i-1 a. ~ 'f i..c::> 1-ro (i!jl/ Ill!/ ll I!/ /ll ll/lfJ. ,aJ m ~o 5::::Al-e:. . ., fL-01 FLAN-BL.JI i.,.,01NG Aoo1fl0Ns · Le~ t:.N o f'H~~e;. l-Al?t11Nl~f~A.flot~ yloo1flCA.floN ~~ iet4fbl<A~i' ~ fFIC:::::-~ '6 f°J~C f:. . f1~A.c:,i:;· J!-Pt:.-~t1~NE:Nf ofFI~~ ~F~e. ~001r1~t'J . PO!S~Jei.,e. fUfLJ~e;. l.,Af?0~""'1t'")f2.:{ A0Pl11c=:?l~~ perlQ1N& eo1(h) M o N 1 Io ~ IN G F f(.o G f</-... t'1 . i., 1,~ .f' ,, RE. Ary~NDA lTEM #12 & 13 Apri 1 3, 1985 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAI N VALLE Y. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10 844 ELLI S AVENUE FOU NTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 C7 14J 540-2910 [71 4 1 962-2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE March 27, 1985 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Present: Richard B. Edgar, Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin, Vice Joint Chairman Robert Hanson Buck Catlin Evelyn Hart James Wahner Don Smith Supervisor Roger Stanton Absent: Convene: Adjourn: Director Ruth Baily Director Don Roth 5:30 p.m. 8:12 p.n. Others Present: Director James Neal Director Richard Olson Director Bob Per.ry Thomas L.-Woodruff, General Counsel Dick Beckendorf, Coast Insurance Agency Jim Sharp, Districts' SCCWRP Representative Bill Knopf, John Carollo Engineers Staff Present: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Blake P. Anderson, Director of Operations Bill Butler, Director of Finance Tom Dawes, Deputy Chief Eng i neer William Clarke, Superintendent Gary Streed, Chief Administrative Assistant 1) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations. The Fiscal Policy Committee reported on matters considered at its March 26th meeting and submitted recommendations as set forth below: a) Y-Rating Policy Staff Report: The Districts are currently in a rather dynamic state of change brought about by several things including significant -1 - Executive Committee Report March 27, 1985 facilities additions at our treatment plants as well .as other programs and responsibilities imposed by regulatory authoriti~s and others. This situation is e xpected to continue into the foreseeable future. One of the impacts of this status is that it often results in major shifts in the responsibilities of certain employees within the organization. When responsibilities are increased, we can generally accommodate that by a promotion to a higher classification. However, responsibilities are occasionally reduced which presents a different situation, in terms of an equitable salary determination for the affected employee, that is not adequately addressed in our current personnel reglations. A typical way to handle this situation is called Y-Rating. Under Y-Rating, when responsibilities are reduced, an employee's salary is frozen until the salary for the new classification that reflects the changed level of responsibility catches up to it, or until a specified time elapses, whichever occurs sooner. This allows an appropriate period for the employee to adjust to the lower income scale. Staff recommend that the Directors consider adding a Y-Rating policy to the personnel regulations. Attached (tan) is a draft policy statement. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation. The Committee supports the staff's recommendation as it will provide desirable flexibility in the salary resolution to equitably recognize situations where an employee's responsibilities are reduced. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the Fiscal Policy Committee. b) 1985 Summer Work Program Staff Report: In 1982, the Boards approved a trial summer work program that employed local young people (mostly students) to augment existing staff and complete various backlogged building, piping and equipment painting, tunnel maintenance and groundskeeping projects that can be completed most effectively in the warm, dry summer months. The Districts have operated this program successfully for the past three years, and the staff recommends authorization for the summer of 1985. The attached (yellow) staff report provides additional background regarding supervision of the forty temporary employees proposed to be hired for the period between May 24 and September 13, 1985. The total cost of the program, including salaries, wages, materials and supplies, is estimated to be $179,000. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation. The Fiscal Policy Committee enthusiastically endorses this program and recommends its reauthorization for 1985. -2- N -Ex~cutive Committee Report March 27, 1985 Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation. c) Lighting Energy Conservation Study Staff Report: In June of 1984, the Boards approved an amendment to an existing purchase order contract with John carollo Engineers (JCE) for preparation of an energy management plan to provide for additional services to conduct a lighting energy conservation study. The purpose of the study, funded equally by the Districts and Southern California Edison Co., was to identify opportunities to reduce lighting levels and install energy saving controls at both plants. Th~ major conclusions of the study are that the Districts can realize substantial cost savings for lighting by removing or re~lacing various existing lighting fixtures throughout the plants and by installing a computerized lighting energy management system (EMS). The following table summarizes the estimated capital costs and the anticipated energy savings and rebates available if the Districts choose to implement these recommendations: Recommended Capital 1st Year Savings Plant Actions Costs 1 Remove/Replace $153,000 $ 50,000 Fixtures Install EMS 134,000 15,000 Subtotal: Plant 1 $287,000 $ 65,000 2 Remove/Replace $222,000 $ 72,000 Fixtures Install EMS 225,000 31,000 Subtotal: Plant 2 $447,000 $103,000 Totals $734,000* $168,000 SCE Rebate $ $34,000 $51,000 $85,000 Twenty-Year Net Savings at Today's Rate $ $1,790,000 $2,886,000 $4,676,000* *Associated costs of repair/replacement of wiring and light poles that will arise during removal/replacement of fixtures, engineering design services and contingencies will increase the total project capital cost to approximately $1,150,000. Assuming electric rate increases of 5% annually, the potential net savings to the Districts is estimated to be $5,500,000 over 20 years. -3- Executive Committee Report March 27, 1985 I - If any Director would like copies of the consulting engineer's full report, please call staff member Hilary Baker at (714) 540-2910. Staff recommended that the Boards approve the report and authorize the Selection Committee to solicit proposals for design of a Lighting Energy Management System (EMS) at Plants 1 and 2. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation. The Fiscal Policy Committee has had an interest in energy conservation for many years and fully supports the recommendation that the Board's Selection Committee be authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate a contract for design and installation of a lighting energy management system. Under the Boards' procedures, the Selection Committee's recommendation would then come back to the Directors for final approval at a later meeting. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee recommendation. d) All-Risk and Excess Liability Insurance Policy Renewals Staff Report: The Districts' insurance broker is presently working with various insurance companies to secure all-risk (earthquake, flood, fire) and excess liability insurance coverage. Within the last year, the insurance market has tightened considerably, and our broker has advised the staff that the favorable premium levels the Districts have experienced for the past three years will probably increase dramatically and less coverage will be available than we are presently receiving. The following table presents the amounts of coverage and associated premium levels for 1984-85. Coverage Renewal Date Amount of Coverage Deductible/Self- Insured Retention 1984-85 Premium All-Risk April 14, 1985 $150,000,000 Earthquake: $500,000 $187,500 Excess Liability April 14, 1985* $ 900,000 July 1, 1985 $ 20,000,000 Flood: $ 25,000 Other: $ 25,000 $100,000** $ 22,500 $1,000,000 $ 18,300 $ 40,000 *Original policy renwal date 7-1-85, however, insurance company has cancelled effective 4-14-85. **The Districts are self-funded for the first $100,000 of liability coverage. -4- * ~E iecutive Committee Report March 27, 1985 Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation. The Committee reported tha~ it has reviewed the current status of the Districts' .all-risk property and excess ·liability insurance policies with the staff and the Districts' insurance broker, Richard P. Beckendorf, Coast Insurance Agency. Mr. Beckendorf made a presentation to the Commi t tee regad ing the rapidly changing insurance marketplace and its impact on the renewal of our all-risk property coverage and our excess public liability coverage. Mr. Beckendorf pointed out the major underwriting losses experienced throughout the insurance industry over the past five years, indicated that many insurers are unwilling to accept new coverage due to l ack of capacity, and advised that in many instances, companies are cancelling existing customers because their reinsurers are also unable or unwilling to maintain their existing levels of coverage. He also commented on the impact of "deep pocket" court decisions on public agency insurance premiums and coverage availability. The Committee reported that it had a lengthy discussion of the financial impact of the decreased levels of coverage available and the higher premiums for the available coverages, and that Mr . Beckendorf had been asked to attend the Executive Committee meeting to explain these developments in the marketplace to the Executive Committee . The Fiscal Policy Committee also· recommended that the Executive Committee take the following actions: That the Districts' insurance broker be directed to continue to seek quotations regarding both types of coverage as originally instructed by the staff. That the Fiscal Policy Committee be authorized to meet again prior to the April 10, 1984 meeting of the Joint Boards to review additional quotations being solicited by our broker and submit a recommendation to the Joint Boards at the April 10th meeting regardi ng acquisition of appropriate risk-property and excess laibility insurance coverage for the Districts for the next year. That , considering the long lead time necessary to place the all-risk property coverage, the Districts' insurance broker attempt to place the coverage at the maximum limits obtainable (estimated to be $75,000,000), with the understanding that at the April 10, 1985 meeting of the Joint Boards, the Directors, at their discretion, could reduce the level of coverage to a lesser amount if deemed desirable. Executive Committee Recommendation. Mr. Beckendorf reviewed the Districts' all-risk and liability insurance coverages and the current status of the insurance market with the Committee. Director Perry, also an independent insurance broker, confirmed the Districts' broker's o_bservat ions and analysis of the present insurance market. -5- Executive Committee Report March 27, 1985 The Executive Committee concurred in th~ Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendations and directed the Committee to submit .its report and recommendations to the Joint Boards on April 10th. The Committee also asked Director Bob Perry to attend the Fiscal Policy Committee meeting on April 4th to provide his expertise and experience in insurance to the Committee during its deliberations. 2) Digester Gas Utilization Study/Recommendation for Central Power Generation. Staff Report. In September 1984, the Boards engaged John ·Carollo Engineers to conduct a Digester Gas Utilization Study. The Districts currently produce over three million cubic feet per day of digester gas (methane/carbon dioxide) as a 11 by-product 11 of the sewage treatment process. Utilization of this gas as a fuel currently saves the Districts more than $4,000,000 per year in energy costs and is, thus, a very important resource. New stringent rules being imposed by SCAQMD on large internal combustion engines that are now utilized extensively in our plants as prime movers have caused this study to be undertaken. In addition, because our digester gas production is expected to increase and because necessary master planned improvements to our treatment facilities will add to our energy demand~, staff had recommended that the study be performed before proceeding with facilities design. The consultant has narrowed the alternatives to three viable ones. The alternatives and their present worth benefit are summarized below: Alternative A) Upgrade Existing Engines: Continue with digester gas fueled direct engine drive concept. Retrofit existing engines to comply with SCAQMD requirements. B) Central Power Generation: Build a central power generation facility at either or both plants to utilize digester gas to produce electricity and recover waste heat. 1) Single Facility (serving both plants) 2) Separate Facilities (at each plant) -6- Present Worth of Benefit* $18,350,000 30,430,000 28,260,000 11 'Executive Committee Report March 27, 1985 C) Sale: Sell digester gas to a private industry or utility. 6,810,000 *Assumes 10% interest, 20 year life, 5% annual escalation of electricity and O&M. Carollo is recommending Central Power Generation, Alternative (8)(2) above, utilizing dual fuel/compression ignition engines or spark ignited clean burn engines. Future treatment and disposal facilities would be equipped with electric motors, powered by the central power generating ·stations, as prime movers instead of internal combustion engines. Existing engines would be phased out as their useful life expires. Alternative (8)(2) is recommended over (B)(l), which has a slightly higher present worth benefit, because separate facilities at each plant provide higher reliability and flexibility. The construction cost for two central power generating stations would be $23.5 million, however, a cost savings of $9.8 million for the proposed new Plant No. 1 Headworks and OutfaJl Booster Pump Station at Plant No. 2 would be realized because electric motors rather than engines would be installed to drive the pumps. Another benefit of the recommended central power generation alternative is that air emissions would be reduced by 60%. Staff reported that it agreed with the consultants' conclusions/recommendations and recommended that the Boards approve the Digester Gas Utilization Study prepared by John Carollo Engineers, and amend the M~ster Plan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities to include the separate Central Power Generation Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Staff also noted that preliminary information on the Digester Gas Utilization/Central Power Generation Study was made available by John Carollo Engineers to the Districts' environmental consultant at our request. Thus, the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities, authorized to be issued for public comment by the Boards in March, addresses the impacts (which are positive) of central power generation. The Boards will conduct a public hearing on the Draft EIR at the April 10th meeting. Enclosed is an Executive Summary of the study. If any Director would like a copy of the full report, please call Hilary Baker at (714) 540-2910 . Executive Committee Recommendation: Mr. Bill Knopf, a principal of John Carollo Engineers, reviewed the report prepared by his firm. The Executive Committee endorses the concept of central power generation and recommends that the Digester Gas Utilization Study be approved and that the 1983 Master Plan for Joint Works Facilities be amended to include separate Central Power Generating Facilities at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. -7- Executive Committee Report March 27, 1985 3) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) Joint Powers Agreement Extension. Staff Report: The Southern California Coastal Water Research Project was established in 1969 to conduct objective oceanographic monitoring and research projects on the effect of the discharge of treated waste to the coastal waters of California from Point Conception to the Mexican border (The Southern California Bight). SCC~P was formed through a Joint Powers Agreement between our Districts, the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, the Ventura Regional County Sanitation District and the City of San Diego. Since then two smaller sanitation agencies have joined as associate members. Annual funding is provided by the member agencies based upon their yearly flow. The current funding level of the signatory agencies is $600,000. Our District's share for 1984-85 was $119,700.00. Additional funding is provided through grants from EPA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). SCC~P employs scientists in speciality areas such as physics, chemistry, biochemistry, benthic ecology, fishery biology, marine biology, and histopathology. They are conducting high quality research that is helping to answer many questions about man's effects on the ocean and marine animals. The program has been very successful and the information gathered over the past 16 years has been extremely helpful in the 30l(h) waiver program. Recent and planned SCC~P work includes the following: 1. Establishing "reference" sites for studying marine animals under natural conditions. 2. Understanding how animals assimilate and detoxify pollutants by isolating the pollutants in special protein compounds. 3. Answering questions related to ocean currents and the fate of wastewater plumes. 4. Understanding the effect of chlorinated hydrocarbons (such as DDT and PCB) on marine animals. 5. Establishing base line conditions of the marine environment in very deep water (over 1000 feet) in anticipation of a research study on the effects of sludge disposal through a pipeline. The current SCC~P Agreement expires in June. The managers of the five agencies have been meeting to discuss SCC~P's goals and their relationship to the member agencies' needs. In this context, now that -8- ,,,,. . . 'Executive Committee Report March 27, 1985 our Distri~ts have been issued a 30l(h) waiver, it is appropriate to address the issues of whether SCCWRP's work duplicat~s the efforts of the Districts' NPDES permit ocean monitoring program and the benefits of continued membership in SCCWRP. · Our past and future NPDES monitoring program is focused around our outfall. It involves rigidly defined s~mpling and observat1on tasks meant to characterize the impacts of our discharge on the immediate area of our outfall. During the next five years, whil~ the Districts new ocean d·ischarge permit is in effect, we will be monitoring to find if there are any s·ignificant adverse environmental effects. We have no expectation of finding any. However, if we do, it is our responsibility to understand why the impact is occurring and take actions to mitigate it. This may include additional industrial waste enforcement or treatment plant modifications. The mechanism of any effects, the contribution of other man made effects, and the impact of our discharge on areas far from our outfall are not addressed by the NPDES monitoring program. SCCWRP's research work can answer these questions and more. They are free to chase down local and regional effects to thoroughly understand them. SCCWRP's research is invaluable in helping us understand man's impact on the ocean. The scientific work that SCCWRP produces will also greatly assist in evaluating the continuation of the 30l(h) modified NPOES permits when they come up for renewal after the initial five year terms. Enclosed (white) is a copy of a proposed amendment to the SCCWRP Agreement extending the Project from July 1, 1985 to June 30, 1988. It also increases the annual contribution which may be requested from the member agencies from $600,000 to $700,000. Our expected annual contribution would be $140,000. Staff recommends renewal of the agreement extending SCCWRP for three additional years and increasing the funding level. Executive Committee Recommendation: Former Director Jim Sharp, the Boards' appointed SCCWRP Commissioner, also briefed the Committee on SCCWRP activities. The Executive Committee fully supports the SCCWRP program and recommends that its three year extension and the proposed contributions from signatory members increase from $600,000 to $700,000 per year be approved. (The Districts estimated annual contribution would increase from $119,700 to approximately $140,000.) 4) Contract Ocean Monitoring Services re New NPDES Permit. Staff Report: Staff reported that one of the requirements of the District's new NPDE S permit is an extensive ocean monitoring program -9- Executive Committee Report -March 27, 1985 that is five times the scope of our current work. Our Laboratory is not equipped or staffed to conduct such a comprehensive effort and staff is recommending that a private oceanographic firm be engaged to perform the work. · Attached (buff) is a staff report and recom mendation along with a time table for selection of an oceanographic firm to provide these contractual services. The estimated annual cost over the five year life of the NPDES permit is between $1 million and $1.5 million. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee reviewed the attached Staff Report and Recommendations for Contract Ocean Monitoring Services required in connection with the Districts• new NPDES Permit and recommends that the report, and the procedures and time schedule for engaging a firm to conduct said monitoring program, be approved. 5) Non-Industrial Toxic Source Control Program. Staff Report: Staff reported on another requirement of the District's new NPDES Permit relative to the preparation and implementation of a Non-Industrial Toxic Source Control Program. Pursuant to federal regulations, this program must be implemented within 18 months after issuance of a 30l(h) modified NPDES permit. Last August, following approval .of the District's NPDES Permit by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Directors engaged K. P. Lindstrom and Associates to prepare a program to comply with this requirement. The consultant has completed the program feas i bility study and implementation plan. There are no formal guidelines on which such a program can be structured so ours will be the first such program to be adopted by a California POTW. Thus, the format, approach and contents are innovative and original. A ~opy (green) of the Executive Summary and Chapter 7, Recommended Program, is enclosed. I f any Director wishes a copy of the full study, please call staff member Hilary Baker at (714) 540-2910. The consultant re commends an initial annual budget of $75,000 to $100,000 for the program. We would expect that approximately one-half of this cost would be staff time by our current Public Information Officer and a proposed new engineer in our industria l waste di vision. Staff recommends the following actions : a) Approve the Non-Industrial Toxic Source Con t rol Program Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan and approve the conceptual program. -10- -,_ '•E ~ecut i ve Cammi ttee Report March 27, 1985 b) Direct the General Manager to include funding for the program in the budget, beginning with the 1985-86 fi.scal year, in an amount up to $100,000. c) Authorize the General Manager to appoint a staff member to the post of Toxics Coordinator to implement and administer the program. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive committee concurs with the staff recommendation. 6) Special Advisory Committee re Water Quality in the Santa Ana River Basin. The Joint chairman reported during the Boards' discussions of the proposal by DOHS/SAWPA to dispose of pretreated Stringfellow groundwaters through the District's treatment and disppsal system, it was suggested that an advisory committee of upper (Riverside/San Bernardino County) and lower (Orange County) Santa Ana River Basin officials be formed to encourage an ongoing dialogue and to enable SAWPA to keep citizens and officials in Orange County informed of the progress that is being made at the Stringfellow waste disposal site, as well as other ongoing plans to improve water quality in the entire Santa Ana River Basin. Me then led a discussion of the proposed Committee's goals and objectives and its potential membership. He also asked the General Counsel to review the Agreement between the Districts and SAWPA relative to the rights and responsibilities of the respective parties. Following the discussion ·of the proposed Committee's purpose and a report on the SAWPA/CSDOC agreement, the Committee continued consideration of the matter to its next meeting. -11- Y-RATE POL I CY A classification study may reveal that the duties of an employee are more appropriately reflected by a lower level classification. This situation may occur when (a) the duties have changed over a period of time, or, (b) when the duties originally assigned to the enployee do not materialize due to unforeseen cir cumstances (ie., loss of funding, program changes, etc .). When it is necessary to re-classify a position to a lower level, the incumbent (employee) shall be Y-rated as follows : YEARS OF SERVICE Less than 5 years 5 through 9 years 10 years or more PERI OD OF Y-RATE 2 years 3 years 4 years During the Y-Rate period, the employee 's salary shall remain frozen until (1) the salary range for the new classification becanes equal to, or greater than the salary of the previous classification , or (2) until the Y-Rate period expires in accordance with the table above. If the new salary range becanes equal or greater than the previous salary range, the incumbent will again becane eligible for appropriate merit increases and range adjusbnents. If the Y-Rate expires the incumbent will be assigned to the top step of the new range . PROPOSED AM.ENIBENT TO PERSONNEL RESOLUTION NO. 79-21 RE: Y-RATING POLICY Section 14. Upon the determination by the General Manager, with the advice and recanmendation of the Personnel Review Canmittee, that a person already employed should be transferred or reclassified to a position with a different title or range number, the assignment of a new salary to such a person shall be made as follows: A. For an employee transferred to a position of substantially the same responsibility, the employee shall be assigned a salary established for said position corresponding to the same step number occupied under the employee's former classification on the effective date of the reclassification. B. For an employee transferred to a position of higher responsibility, the employee shall be assigne~ a salary established for said position up to the step number occupied under the former classification on the effective date of the reclassification. C. For an employee moved to a position of lesser responsibility or lower salary range, the employee shall be assigned a salary as follows: 1. Cemotion -If the downward move is a demotion for -------- disciplinary or other reasons, the employee shall be assigned to a salary step deemed appropriate by the General Manager. 2. Reclassification -If the downward move is a re- classif ic~tion resulting fran a review of the duties assigned to the employee , the salary of the employee shall be Y-rated (frozen) as follows : YEARS OF SERVIC E PERIOD OF Y-RATE Less than 5 years 2 years 5 through 9 years 3 years 10 years or rrore 4 years D.lring the Y-Rate period, the employee's salary shall remain frozen until (1) the salary range for the new classification becanes equal to, or greater than the salary of the previous classification , or ill until the Y-Rate period expires in accordance with the table above. .!!_ the new salary range becanes equal or greater than the previous salary range, the incumbent will again becane eligible for appropriate merit increases and range adjustments. If the Y-Rate expires the incumbent will be assigned to the top step of the new range . ·'-- SUMMER WORK PROGRAM 1985 In 1982, the Boards approve~ a trial summer work program that employed local young p:~ople (mostly students) to help on backlogged building, piping and equipment painting, tunnel m ai ntenance and additional grou ndsk eepi ng that is necessary during the summer months. The program proved very successful and was repeated . in 1983 and 1984. Staff is now recommending authorization for the 1985 sum mer. The program provides for a temporary salary uperade (5.5%) for our full- time painters and groundskeepers to serve as crew le2.ders. Each c rew leader runs a 5-7 person team to perform the va rious levels of required work. The work is _ accomplished by hiring up to forty temporary employees for painting, cleaning and grou nd skeeping at $5.00 per hour. These employees a r e not e li gib le for fringe benefits. Anticipated cost from May 24th through September 13th is as follows: Painting, Cleaning & Groundskeeping Salaries & Wages Materials & Supplies TOTAL $139,000 40,000 $179,000 It would be desirable to obtain Board authorization at the May 8th Board meeting to allow s ufficient time to recruit candid a tes to sta rt work in la te May. Therefore, s t aff is requ esting authorization to place the matter on the May Board agenda if the program is approved by the fiscal Policy and Executive Committees. .. ,. Position foreman Lead Painter Painter III Painter II Painter Helper Grndskpr I Mtce Man * Utilityman 1985 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM PROPOSED CREW ASSIGNMENTS Name S tok ich · Harris Dunmore Colomonico Caudill Ruiz Wiley Stanley Crew Size 7 7 7 7 5 5 2 Location & Duties Overall Supervision Plant 2 Painting Plant Painting Plants l & 2 Equipment Cleanup Plant 2 Painting Plants Plants & 2 Groundskeeping & 2 Tunnels & Sumps Pump Station Paintin g It is recommended that staff be given the authority to promote up to eight people from the Maintenance Department as c rew leade rs, with a 5.5% increase for the duration of the sum mer program. *Not recommended for Crew Leader upgrade. ... - - - - - - CIGESTER GAS UTILIZATION FILED In the Office of the Secr~tary county sanitation District J ~I ri '\ Sdo·11 1\ ~~ N -I ' t 1 APR 10 i985 eys;JCJr. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY March 1985 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Joint Treatment Works OHNCAROLLO NGINEERS l'MOI Hll: AZ • W AlNUlCA([I( CA '0UNl.t.l N VAU('t' CA • VISALIA C A TUCSON 4l • S.\trii DIEGO CA. - - BACKGROUND CS DOC JOINT TREATMENT WORKS DIGESTER GAS UTILIZATION STUDY. . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY General. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) presently utilize a portion of the digester gas produced at the Joint Treatment Works to fuel internal combustion engines for driving pumps, blowers, and compressors. In addition some gas is sold to the Mobil Oil Company and a small quantity of gas is used in the boilers for steaming sludge piping and during the winter months to heat the diges- ters. Surplus digester gas is flared. Presently there are 25 digester gas fueled internal combustion engines installed at Plants No. 1 and No. 2 including two engine driven pumps recently installed at Headworks C at Plant No. 2. The engines range in size from 20P HP to 1500 HP. Four engines are dual-fuel com- pression ignition type while the remaining 21 engines are rich-burn spark ignition type. The total installed horsepower of engines utiliz- ing digester gas is approximately 4000 HP at Plant No. 1 and 8,700 HP at Plant No. 2 for a total of 12,700 HP. Preliminary design studies to date include the future construction of a new outfall booster pump station at Plant No. 2 including 4 engine driven pumps and 1 motor driven pump as well as a new headworks at Plant No. 1 with 2 engine driven pumps and 2 motor driven pumps. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD) adopted new regulations (Rule lllO. l) regarding NO and CO emissions X· 1 - from gas fueled reciprocating-type stationary internal combustion engines in October, 1984. Specifically Rule 1110.1 requires a 7.0 per- cent reduction of NOx emissions from existing lean-burn engines and an 80 percent reduction from existing rich-burn engines. The rule also requires a maximum of 2.0 gm/HP-hr for new or existing lean burn engines controlled exclusively by combustion chamber modifications (precombus- tion chambers). These emission standards cannot be met with the exist- ing digester gas fueled engines. A reevaluation of the concepts for utilization of digester gas in engines at the treatment plants is neces- sitated due to the adoption of this Rule by the SCAQMD. Digester Gas Production. Anaerobic digestion of sludge produces digester gas, which is a mixture of methane (about 65 percent) and carbon dioxide (about 35 percent) gas. Digester gas has a heating value (600 to 650 btu/cf) of 60 to 65 percent of natural gas heating value (1,000 to 1,050 btu/cf). Present digester gas production and year 199 5 digester gas production for both Plants No. I and No. 2 has been estimated as set forth in the following table. Most of the increase in gas production is expected to take place at Plant No. 1. TOT AL DIGESTER GAS PRODUCTION -CFO Plant No. 1 Plant No. 2 · TOTAL 1984 986,000 2, 129,000 3, 115,000 2 1995 1,691,000 2,347,000 4,038,000 ----------------·· . --------------· ·--·----·--··--···--·· ····--·-··-····-·· Digester Gas Use. Following table sets forth the present digester gas use in the plants including gas sold to·Mobil Oil Co. and the surplus gas being flared. Also presented is estimated year 1995 gas use if the Outfall Booster Pump Station at Plant No. 2 and Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 is constructed using engine driven pumps. If motors are used, the surplus gas (flared) in 1995 would be 1,777,000 cfd. DIGESTER GAS USE AND VALUE ITEM 1984 1995 Total Gas Production -cfd 3, 115,000 4,038,000 Value of Gas -$per year $4,900,000 $6,350,000 (If converted to Electricity) Gas Used in Engines -cfd 2,500,000 2,998,000 Gas Sold to Mobil Oil -cfd 200,000 200,000 Surplus Gas Flared -cfd 415,000 840,000 Air Emissions Requirements. The South ·Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQ~ID) provides regional control of air pollution for Orange County. A summary of SCAQMD rules and regulations applicable to CSDOC is presented in Exhibit 1. Rule 431.1 addresses the sale and use of digester gas. The Districts cannot sell digester gas containing in excess of 250 ppm hydrogen sulfide nor flare or use digester gas at the plant site con- taining in excess of 800 ppm hydrogen sulfide after July 1, 1985.-The Districts are presently designing and constructing ferrous chloride facilities ·(one system at each plant) to be able to comply with Rule 431.1 by July 1, 1985. 3 -------·-------· ------·-·---~-·-·. Rule 1110.1 regulates the emissions· of oxides of nitrogen and carbon monoxide from stationary engines. Rule 1303 limits the net emis- sion increase from new stationary sources and modified existing sta- tionary sources for carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, reactive organic gases, and lead compounds. Standby engines are exempt from Rules 1110.1 and 1303 because they operate less than 200 hours per year. Rule 1110.1 compliance dates for existing digester gas fueled engines at Plants No. 1 and No. 2 are presented in Exhibit 2. Non-Selective Catalytic Reduction (NSCR), as developed for passenger cars, has not proved successful on digester gas fueled engines, therefore SCAQMD does not accept NSCR as BACT (Best Available Control Technology) for digester gas fueled engines. The Districts are presently negotiating with a private firm to install selective dilution for three existing engines to see if this would meet BACT. (The results of these tests will not be known, however, until summer, 1985.) The engine manufacturers state that conversion (or replacement) of the existing engines to clean burn engines would meet the requirements of Rule 1110.1 and are considered BACT. Clean burn engines ignite a rich air fuel mixture in a precombustion chamber and this propagates combus- tion in a lean air fuel mixture in the cylinder. PURPOSE This report sets forth the best way to maximize the use of the digester gas produced and meet SCAQMD requirements, in view of the fact that: 4 1. 2. The total energy available from the digester gas is not being utilized. This additional energy could be utilized by the Districts to reduce their electric bills, and 3. Recent engine air emission restrictions adopted by the SCAQMD nulify present engine utilization. The alternatives which would accomplish this goal are pre- sented hereafter. ALTERNATIVES This report evaluates various alternatives for maximizing beneficial use of the digester gas. The most viable of these are: Alternative A, Upgrade Existing Engines. Retrofit existing engines to comply with SCAQMD require- ments. Continue with digester gas fueled direct engine drive concept. Alternative B, Cogeneration. Build a cogeneration facility at either or both plants to utilize digester gas and to produce electricity and recover waste heat. Alternative C, Sale. Sell digester gas to a private industry or utility. Alternative A, Upgrade Existing Engines. The 1995 Power requirements of the various pumps and blowers were determined and used as a basis for determining digester gas consumption by the existin~ engines. · Under this alternative all of the available digester gas is not used by the existing engines. Some of the surplus gas will continue to be sold to Mobil Oil Co. The remaining surplus gas will continue to be flared. 5 - - - - ... Existing engines would be retrofitted with emission control devices to comply with Rule 1110~1. Retrofitting the existing engines with selective dilution technology would be less costly than modifying them with clean burn technology, however, results of selective dilution testing on Distric~'s engines will not be known until Summer, 1985. At this time it is not possible to predict if selective dilution technology will be successful or not on digester gas fueled engines, therefore, modifying existing engines to clean burn is used for comparison pur- poses. Several subalternatives were examined. The alternative used for comparison does not include for a small cogeneration station to utilize the gas not required by the existing engines. It is assumed that under this alternative the new OBPS at Plant No. 2 and new Head- works No. 2 at Plant No. 1 will use engine driven pumps as recommended in the preliminary design studies for these projects. Alternative B, Cogeneration. Three viable prime movers for a cogeneration facility are dual fuel/compression-ignition engines, clean- burn spark ignited engines, and gas turbines. The principal advantage of engines is their widespread and successful use with digester gas, which minimizes the risk of unforseen problems. Gas turbines of a size applicable for a CSDOC cogeneration facility are not as efficient as engines. Combined cycle turbines, in which the products of combustion from the gas turbine ·pass through a waste heat steam generator which produces steam for a steam turbine- driven generator, have efficiencies similar to those of engines but with a higher capital ~ost. The SCAOMD may require SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) technology for reciucing NOx emissions from gas turbines. 6 - - - - - - There is no experience with this technology on digester gas, however. Engines would produce a greater present worth of net benefit than both simple and combined cycle gas turbines. Due to lack of experience with and higher cost of turbines, it is concluded that dual fuel compression ignition engines or clean burn spark ignited engines should be used for the cogeneration alternative. The cogeneration facility could be constructed at Plant No. 2, or separate facilities could be constructed at both Plant Nos. 1 and 2. A single cogeneration facility would be slightly lower in cost than two separate facilities and would require staffing at only one plant. Separate cogeneration facilities would produce more electricity and would not be dependent on the interplant digester gas pipeline and therefore be more reliable. The electrical output from the cogeneration facility would be connected to the existing electrical system in parallel with Southern California Edi son. For separate cogeneration facilities, (one at each plant) all the power output from generators could be used in the plant. For a single cogeneration facility (at Plant No. 2) a small per- centage (up to 5 percent) of power output may have to be sold to South- ern California Edison at a lower rate than the Districts pay for purchasing power. (This is because the average output from a single coge nerat ion facility at Plant ~o. 2 may be more than the ave rage and minimum power demand at Plant No. 2.) Under the cogeneration alternative, future design for the OBPS at Plant No. 2 and Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 will use all motor driven pumps rather than engines. This would result in project cost 7 -' - savings of $9,190,000 for the Outfall Booster Pump Station Project and $600,000 for the new headworks project. Under this alternative the existing engines may be operated as standby primemovers. To provide additional flexibility and reliability, existing engines may be retrofitted with selective dilution technology (if proven successful) or clean burn technology or replaced with elec- tric motors. This could be decided on a case by case basis depending on the remaining useful life, test results of dilution technology, elec- trical distribution capacity and reliability needs. Alternative C, Sale. A mail and phone survey was conducted to determine possible buyers of digester gas. Two parties expressed some interest. One would purchase unscrubbed gas at a relatively low price (14Q per therm). The other would pay a higher price, but requires that the digester gas be scrubbed to pipeline quality gas. There are several technologies available for scrubbing the gas, some remove the impurities by absorbing (dissolving) them in a liquid, others by absorbing them on the surface of a solid, while others oxidize them. Water scrubbing was used as the basis for the cost analysis. Selling unscrubbed gas pro- vides a greater benefit than selling scrubbed gas. COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES Financial Comparison. Financial comparison of the three alternatives including project cost, operating and maintenance cost, net benefit from the project and present worth of net benefit is presented in Table 1. It is obvious from Table 1 that the cogeneration alterna- tive provides the highest benefit to the Districts. 8 I \0 I I t I i i l I ( I I ( I l « R :. TABLE 1 FINANCIAL COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES Upgrading Existing Engines Cogeneration Facility Sale Unscrubbed Gas Item Project Cost Additional Cost for Engine Drives for the Outfail Booster Pump Station and Headworks No. 2 TOTAL PROJECT COST Annual Gross Revenue/Savings Annual Operation and Mainte- nance Costs Annual Net Revenue/Savings Present Worth of Benefit (2 ) $4,490,000 $ 9,790,000 $14,280,000 $4,350,000 $1, 7 90,000 $2,560,000 $18,350,000 Central Separate Cogeneration Cogeneration Facility Facility $21,700,000 (1) $23,480,000 (1) $7,590,000 $21,700,000 $23,480,000 $7,590,000 $6,120,000 $6,350,000 $2,330,000 $2,030,000 $2,290,000 $1,200,000 $4,090,000 $4,060,000 $1,130,000 $30,430,000 .$28, 260 ,000 $6,810,000 (1) These costs are based on engines with a speed of 720 rpm (600 rpm engines approximately $2,000,000 more). See Exhibit 4 for cost breakdown. (2) 10 percent interest, 20 year period, 5 percent annual escalation of electricity and O&M l - Alternative Screening. Ten screening criteria are used to reflect the Distri:cts"' major areas of concern. They are project cost, economic benefit, economic stability, technical feasibility, operational feasibility, reliability, environmental impacts, construction impacts, land use and digester gas ·utilization. The resulting screening matrix is presented in Table 2. Table 2 indicates that the cogeneration alter- native has the highest ranking, while the sale alternative has the lowest ranking. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Cogeneration is recommended as the alternative which would best meet the Districts' overall needs. This use of digester gas would produce power equivalent of up to $4,900,000 today and $6,350,000 in the future. 2. Dual fuel compression ignition engines or spark ignited clean burn engines should be used for the cogeneration facility. 3. It is recommended that ·separate cogeneration facilities (one at each plant) be used. Although separate cogeneration f acil- i ties provide a slightly lower present worth of net benefit, it provides higher reliability and flexibility. 4. The new Outfall Booster Pump Station at Plant No. 2 and the new Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 should be designed using motor driven pumps. This would result in a project cost savings of $9,790,000 for these facilities, as compared to the installation of engine driven pumps. 5. An implementation schedule should be developed for all exist- ing engines considering SCAQMD Rule 1110.1 compliance sched- ule, test results of selective dilution technology and most cost effective way to utilize some of the existing engines to provide continued flexibility and reliability in pumping until the new cogeneration facility is operational. 6. It is expected that with new cogeneration facilities NOx emis- ·sions would be reduced by more than 80 percent compared to Alternative A.. Emissions comparison based on year 1995 is presented in Exhibit 3. 10 l I R i I a a I 'i. ( I l I I I I "{ I i TABLE 2 SCREENING MATRIX Upgrading Existing Engines Co~eneration Facility Sale Unscrubbed Gas 'Central Separate Cogeneration Cogeneration Screening Relative Facility Facility Criteria Weight(l) R s R s R s R s Project Cost 4 3 12 4 16 3 12 5 20 Economic Benefit 5 3 15 5 25 5 25 1 5 Economic Stability 5 5 25 5 25 5 25 2 10 Technical Feasibility 5 4 20 5 25 5 25 5 25 Operation ...... Feasibility 4 5 20 5 20 5 20 5 20 ...... Reliability 4 4 16 4 16 5 20 4 16 Environmental Impacts 3 5 15 4 12 5 15 3 9 Construction Impacts 3 3 9 5 15 5 15 5 15 Land Use 2 .5 10 4 8 4 8 5 10 Digester Gas Utilization 2 3 6 5 10 ..2.. 10 4 8 TOTAL SCORE 148 172 175 138 RANKING (4) (2) (1) (1) (3) (1) Relative Weight: 5-most important, I-least important (2) Rating = R: 5-good, 0-poor (3) Score = S: Relative weight multiplied by rating Maximum Achievable Total Score = 185 ( 4) Ranking: I-best, 5-worst IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATION The recommended project is to build separate cogeneration facilities, one at each plant. As shown in Exhibit 4, estimated project cost (January, 1985 dollars) is $8,820,000 for Plant No. 1 and $14,660,000 for Plant No. 2, i.e., a total of $23,480,000 for both plants. As noted in conclusion No. 4, the recommended project would result in project cost savings of $9,790,000 for the Outfall Booster Pump Station at Plant No. 2 and the Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1. Prepurchase VS. Conventional Construction Approach: The cogeneration facilities could be built using a conventional construction approach or by prepurchasing the engines, generators and switchgear equipment. The advantages of prepurchase are a simplified design and a shorter project completion time. There may be potential savings in equipment markup costs also. Prepurchase of the major. equipment woui'd simplify the design effort, while the availability of accurate shop drawings would result in a more comprehensive set of contract draw- ings. This is because each of the various engine manufacturers would provi<le a different size, and different number of engines therefore requiring a different building layout. The process of applying for and receiving a Permit to Con- struct from the SCAQMD would also be simplified and expedited if the major equipment is prepurchased, as the data would be acquired directly from the engine manufacturer. In this way the permit to construct could be obtained before completion of final design. 12 ---------·--------- There are disadvantages associated with the prepurchase option. The most apparent one is that more work is required to admin- ister the additional contract package. Additionally, potential change orders related to the coordination and interfacing problems between two contracts exist. In conclusion, it appears that the advantages of the pre- purchase option outweigh its disadvantages and we recommend that the engine, generators, and switchgear equipment be pre-purchased. Implementation Schedule. The projected dates of key events required to implement the project are shown in Figure 1. If the project is to be kept on schedule these actions must occur by each of the given dates. It is estimated that the projects would be operational in about 4 years after start of final design. 13 l -~ I I l t , MANUFACTURE OF PREPURCHASE EQUIPMENT REVIEW OF PREPURCHASE SUBMITTALS BIDDING AND AWARD OF PREPURCHASE CONTRACT PREPARATION OF PREPURCHASE SPECIFICATIONS SLUDGE GAS UTILIZATION STUDY ( PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDDING AND AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT FROM SCAQMD I l t 1!Ii!i~Iiiii.1 li!i!ii!li!i!M DISTRICT REVIEW I a I i\l~\lHlll1~j!j1l1~eamlllltl\1i ~\lll1l1l~\1i~\ll\lllll~ 1\j\j\j\j\j\\\\l\\\jjjjj\j\j\j\j!\i.\11\\y;§!~llllllllll\\j\j\\lj\j\j\j\jj\jjjj~j~ 111111]1i111ll1111111: ( I I l GENERATE ELECTRIC ITV l ; I • l1l~llf 11lll\l1l1l\l1l1l1l1l1l1l1l1l1l1l1l1l1l1l1l1l1l\l\lll\l\1\i\ii!1j1!!:1~Jl1l1l1l\l\1\jlj\j\lllljHjjjljlj1l1l1ll~jllli111ll~ll1~ 1985 1988 1987 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY DIGESTER GAS UTILIZATION STUDY 1988 1989 . fii!fHN CAADLLD ~GINEEAB-----------------------------------------------FIGURE 1 l Rule No. 407 431.1 1110.1 1303 EXHIBIT 1 SUMMARY OF AQMD RULES Discharger Liquid·& Air Contaminants Sell Digester Gas Utilize Digester Gas Stationary Internal Combustion Engines Existing and New Rich-Burn Lean Burn New Stationary sources, or modifications to existing stationary" sources Digester Gas Contaminant NOx co NOx co so 2 NOx Particulate matter Reactive organic gases Lead Compounds Emission Limitations 500 ppm 2000 ppm 250 ppm 800 ppm 90%/80% or(l) or 90 ppm 2000 ppm 80%/7 0% or 150 ppm or 2 gms/BHP-Hr 550 lb/day 150 lb/day 100 lb/day 150 lb/day 75 lb/day 3 lb/day 20 ppm (BACT) (1) Minimum 90 percent reduction in initial test and 80 percent reduc- tion thereafter. 15 - EXHIBIT 2 RULE 1110.1 COMPLIANCE DATES FOR THE EXISTING ENGINES Engine No. and Location If 1 ' 114 Headworks !f2' 113 P.E.P.S. 111, 112 Blower 115, t!6, fn, 118 Headworks C fl 9' #10 Headworks B 11 l ' fl 3 P.W.P.S. 112, 113 P.E.P.S. Ill O.F. 112' 113 O.F. 119, 1110 O.F. 1110 O.F. tll, 112 Digester Gas Compressor 11 l ' ti 3 Headworks c NG = Natural Gas DG = Digester Gas BHP 350 230 1500 350 235 325 300 600 690 1200 1200 200 400 TypecY) Date for Fuel Compliance NG & DG 12/31/88 NG & DG 12/31/88 Diesel & DG Not applicable NG & DG 12/31/86 NG & DG 12/31/87 NG & DG 12/31/87 NG & DG 12/31/87 NG & DG 12/31/86 Diesel & DG Not applicable NG & DG 12/31/86 NG & DG 12/31/86 NG & DG 12/31/95 NG & DG (2) (1) (2) Districts have received permit to operate based on NG operation. 16 - > < c ....... 5000 4000 (/) 3000 c z ::> 0 a. z - (/) z 0 -(/) (/) ~ w 2000 1000 5442 ( 1) 1995 Operating Conditions (2) NMHC -Non-methane hydrocarbons EXISTING ENGINEs<1 > 230 COGENERATION FACILITY<1 > 924 5591 311 --154 155 155 36 55 :i.·_;,~_i_,··.,f :i: .. =,i .. ,:.=1~_.=i.=t:_.=r.=!·_.=i·~,:_.=~_,:_.=1~_,;_=1.=_,1.r.='.=i;_='. .. _=i=_:; .. _.=1:.'..::.1_==~ .. =~ . . . ~ .. ~·~.:.:.~·.;~.--~;.;.~·.~-~ .. ~.~~.-~~-~·.~-~·.~i.~:.; .. ~~.=.~j.· O-'-~........_~...._-'-~_.......~...._--'-~-'===.___._~....,._Ll:tJ....---e==:::::C··m·.·.·:·.5:.,..:.m:<-,. co 802 POLLUTANT NMHc<2 > Particulates EMISSIONS COMPARISON EXISTING ENGINES VS COGENERA TION EXHIBIT 3 _ r .JOHN CAROLLO ~~ENGINEERB-------------------------------------------------------- ~ 17 ... EXHIBIT 4 SEPARATE COGENERATION FACILITIES -ESTIMATED CAPITAL COST Item CAPITAL COST 1. 2. 3. 4. s. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Engine Generators - Uninstalled Installation and Auxiliary Equipment Buildings Replace 3 engines with motors at Headworks C Electrical Emission Controls for Existing Engines Piping and Miscellaneous Standby Power Fac~lity for OBPS Heat Recovery for Plant 1 Blower :Engines CONSTRUCTION COST Contingencies, Engineering, et~. (1) PROJECT COST TOTAL PROJECT COST (2) BOTH FACILITIES Plant 1 Plant 2 $2, 7 00,000 $3,910,000 1,350,000 1,960,000 1,090,000 1,570,000 490,000 490,000 710,000 300,000 250,000 740,000 1,060,000 1,500,000 220,000 $6,890,000 $11,450,000 1,930,000 3,210,000 $8,820,000 $14,660,000 $23,480,000 (3) (1) Construction contingency (10%); engineering, inspection, surveying and soils work (16.5%); legal and administrative (1.5%). (2) January, 1985 costs, ENR Construction Cost Index= ?400 (3) These costs based on engines with a speed of 720 rpm (600 rpm engines approximately $2,000,000 more) 18. lil -·· ~ SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMEMT CREATING AN AGENCY TO BE KNOWN AS THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT AUTHORITY This second amendment to Amended Joint Powers Agreement Creating an Agency to be Known .as the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority is made and entered into effective July 1, 1985 by and between the City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "Los Angeles"), County ·Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, a special district (hereinafter "Orange County District"), the City of San Diego, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter "San Diego"), County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, a special district (hereinafter "Los Angeles County District"), and The Ventura Regional County Sanitation District, a special district (hereinafter "Ventura County District"). WHEREAS, each of the foregoing public agencies has here- tofore authorized the establishment and operation of The Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority (hereinafter "Authority") pursuant to Joint Powers Agreement dated October 20, 1969, amendments thereto dated September 27, 1972 and September 17, 1975 and an Amended Joint Powers Agreement effective July 1, 1979. WHEREAS, effective July 1, 1982, the parties authorized and executed a First Amendment to said Amended Joint Powers Agreement. WHEREAS, it is the desire of each of the foregoing public 4553.2 1. --,Q •. agencies hereby to amend further said Amended Joint Powers Agreement as Amended. NOW THEREFORE,-the parties do. agree as follows: A. Article 8 of said Amended Joint Powers Agreement as amended is further amended as follows: The second and third sentences of the third paragraph of said Article are amended to read: Said report shall be made and presented to the governing bodies of Los Angeles, Orange County District, San Diego, Los Angeles County District, Ventura County District. The report shall, among other things, contain a statement of anticipated outside sources ·of revenue, and shall separately indicate the net funds requested from the foregoing named agencies which sum shall not exceed $700,000. The final sentence of the fourth paragraph of said Article is amended to read: None of the public agencies named above shall be required or requested to expend in any one fiscal year more than its proportionate share of $700,000. Following the fourth paragraph a further paragraph is added to read: A copy of said report shall concurrently be fur- nished to any public agency which has become an associate member pursuant to Article 15 hereof 2. together with a statement of the amount due from eac~ such agency determined in accordance with Article 15 which amount shall be in addition to the sum of $700,000 set forth above. B. Article 11 of said Amended Joint Powers Agreement as amentled is further amended to read as follows: 11. TERM The Amended Joint Powers Agreement effective July 1, 1979, as amended, and the research project provided for thereby shall remain in full force and effect until and including June 30, 1988. c. Article 15 of said A.mended Joint Powers Agreement as amended is further amended to read as follows: The final sentence of the first paragraph of said-Article is amehded to read: The Commission shall determine the amount of money that shall be paid annually by a new Associate Member which amount shall be proportionate to its flow as provided in Article 8 (formerly Article 7) of said·A.~ended Joint Powers Agreement as amended; provided that in no event shall the flow from any Associate Member be deemed to be less than 6,500/MG (million gallons) per year. 3. jp' r D. Except as provided herein, the signatory agencies '-"' shall be bound by all of the provisions of the Amended Joint Powers Agreement effective July 1, 1979 as amended ·by the first amendment thereto effective July 1, 1~82. E. This Second Amendment to Amended Joint Powers agreement may be executed in counterpart. In witness whereof the parties have executed this Second Amendment on the dates hereinafter set forth. ATTEST: By Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Dated: ATTEST: By Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Dated: 4. THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES By Dated: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY By Dated: ATTEST: Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Dated: ATTEST: By Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KNAPP, GROSSMAN & MARSH By ---------------------~~~ B. Richard Marsh Dated: ATTEST: By Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: \.,./ Dated : 5. THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO Dated: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY By Dated: VENTURA REGIONAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT By Dated: ATTEST: By -------------------------- Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By -------------------------- Dated: ATTEST: By -------------------------- Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KNAPP, GROSSMAN & MARSH By ------~~--~--~--------B. Richard Marsh Dated: ATTEST: By -------------------------- Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By ~ Dated: s. THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO By --------------------------- Dated: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY By Dated: VENTURA REGIONAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT By Dated: - March 21, 1985 STAFF REPORT AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTR ICTS of 0 RAN GE C OUN TY. C ALI FORNIA P.0 .BOX 81 27 10844 ELLI S AV ENUE FOUNTAIN VALL EY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (71 4) 540-29 10 (7 14 )96 2-241 1 RECOMMENDATION FOR CONTRACT OCEAN MONITORING SERVICES RE: DISTRICTS' NEW NPDES PERMIT The long process of obtaining the Districts new NPDES ocean discharge permit from the EPA and the California Regional Water Quali t y Control Board (CRWQCB ) is nearly completed. The CRWQCB approved the permit in July 1984, the EP A gave its approval on February 22 and the permit is scheduled to become effective April 1. THE NEW NPDES OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT The EPA issues National Pollutant Discharge Eliminat i on System (NPDES) permits to all publicly owned treatment works (POTW 1 s) that discharge into na v igable waters . Each permit specifies a large number of conditions and limitations that must be achieved by the discharger. Detailed monitoring and reporting require- ments are also specified in the permit. The quality of discharge required under the new NPDES permit represents a signi- ficant improvement over the quality required in the past permit. In 19 83 and 1984 the Districts competed major improvements at bo th plan t s t ha t inclu ded increasing secondary treatment from 60 MGD to 135 MGD and add i ng sludge pro- cessing facilities. The discharge of suspended solids has been reduced to one- third of its former level and BOD has been reduced to two -thirds of its former level. The permit also contains 20 stringent trace toxicant s l imitation s based on ocean protection criteria contained in the State of Californ i a 1 s Ocean Pl an. This document was last modified in 1983 by the State Water Resource s Control Boa r d. The modification process included an Environmental Impact Report and public hearings in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). NPDES page 2 THE NEW MONITORING PROGRAM The 5-year NPDES permit has been approved by EPA and the CRWQCB because they agree with the Districts' projection that the discharge under the terms of the permit will not cause any adverse environmental or public health effects . However, to be certain that t his is true, the permit contains detailed moni - toring tasks designed to assess the actual impac t s of the discharge. The tasks are quite ambitious in their scope and detail, creating a monitoring program that is unprecedented in its size and effort. The estimated annual cost is bet - ween $1.0 and $1 .5 million do l lars . This compares to a current expenditure of between $200,000 and $300,000 per year . The new program is a significant departure from the Districts' current monitoring effort and is beyond our present capabilities. Existing staff, laboratory faci l ities, and oceanographic ship support are insufficient to conduct the program . Portions of the program are more sophist i cated than the existing one. Once fully implemented, it is quite possible that i t will be increased or decreased by the EPA, depending upon the findings of the intensified monitoring efforts. For t hese reasons , staff recommends that Requests for Proposals (RFP's) be sent to all of the known qua l ified oceanographic monitori ng firms on the West Coast that are capable of conducting a program of this magnitude. Numbering between 15 and 20, these f i rms are presently conduct i ng monitoring contracts for public utilities, oil companies, and Federal agencies. In May of last year, Districts' staff anticipated the probable need for monitoring help and mailed Requests for Letters of Interest to all known oceanographic monitoring contractors on the West Coast. The purpose was to determine the feasibility and cost of using contract services . The results were encouraging. Thirteen firms provided Letters of Interest . Nine were determi ned to be responsive to the request and seven provided cost estimates between $1.03 and $1.45 million . Based on the detailed responses contained within the Letters of Interest, staff has concluded t hat contract services are feasible, desirable, and appropriate . RECOMMENDED SELEC TI ON PROCEDURE Selection of the contractor to perform the work must be done carefully. There is a potential 5-year expenditure of $5.1 to $7.3 million. The techniques used in sampling and analyzing the data must be conducted according to EPA approved methods. Management of the nearly 200,000 discrete data points is necessary to obtain meaningful information . The conclusions made will be used by the EPA, the RWQCB, and Districts' staff for making regulatory and operational decisions. Therefore, the following selection procedure is recorrnnended: - NPDES page 3 March 27, 1985 Apri 1 1, 1985 Apri 1 10, 1985 Apri 1 12, 1985 May 1, 1985 May 9, 1985 May 16, 1985 May 31, 1985 June 14, 1985 June 19' 1985 June 20, 1985 July 10' 1985 July 25, 1985 September 1, 1985 November 1, 1985 Staff submits ocean monitoring staff report and recommended selection procedure to Executive Committee for consideration Effective date of permit Executive Committee report to Joint Boards Districts mail contractors notification of pending RFP. Mailing includes monitoring program requirements contained in permit and examples of past monitoring data to familiarize contractors with the general conditions they will face in obtaining and analyzing samples. EPA completes and issues monitoring guidance document that contains methods, quality assurance, and other information that will describe the program in fine detail. RFP is issued to contractors. Presubmittal conference. Last day for contractors to submit proposals to Districts. Staff completes initial screening of contractors to short 1 is t. Selection Committee interviews short listed contractors and makes a selection. Selection Committee negotiates a contract price. Selection Committee submits recommendation to Joint Boards. Contract documents executed and Notice to Proceed issued. Contractor is partially mobilized. Monitoring program is 70% in place. Contractor is completely mobilized. Monitoring prog r am is 100% in place. March 17, 1985 Mr. Wayne Sylvester General Manager K. P. LINDSTROM & ASSOCIATES PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT AL CONSUL TING SER VICES County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Subject: Submittal of Final Report on CSDOC Nonindustrial Toxic Source Control Program Enclosed for the Districts' use is a final camera-ready copy of the subject report for printing and distribution. An Executive Summary has been includ~d for use by the Districts' Board of Directors. It has been a challenging report to prepare since no formal guidelines exist and it is the first of its kind. We look forward to being of assistance in implementing an acceptable and effective program. K. P. LINDSTROM & ASSOCIATES Kris P. Lindstrom President KPL:sp Enclosure 1177 Brownwyk Drive. Sacramento, California 95822 -._,; . EXECUTIVE SUM!vf.ARY INTRODUCTION The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) have prepared the Nonindustrial Toxic Source Control Program Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan in response to a requirement of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Santa Ana Region) • This requirement, specific to section 301 (h) of the Clean Water Act, is set forth in a newly-issued National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Penni t'. Such a program is the first such program to be adopted by a California Publicly Ownea Treatment Works (POTW) • There are no formal guidelines or model programs on .which such a program can be structured, thus the format, approach and contents are innovative and original. The program report contains background infor~ation on toxics control programs, nonindustrial (all wastes nqt under industrial permit requirements include small industry, cornme.rcial and domestic waste) waste generation, collection, treatment and di~posal/rec~cling and wastewater-related toxics control efforts. The following sections briefly describe the contents of the 163- page Final Report which has seven chapters and five appendices which are identified berow: · ~~APTER I: INTRODUCTION Provides an overview of the Districts' request and approval of a 30l(h) NOPES Permit. CHAPTER II: MANDATE FOR PROGRAM Describes the historical mandate for the program and general background on what is known about the presence of toxic compounds in wastewater effluents. CHAPTER III: CONTROL OF NONINDUSTRIAL TOXIC WASTES Provides an overview of the present regulatory framework for toxics control and vci.rious adopted and proposed legislation. Identifies the agencies responsible for these programs and describes various regional and local programs aimed at mana·ging nonindustrial toxic wastes including Toxic Round-up programs for c~llecting household wastes and Information Hotlines. The vari- ous waste management options and educational programs which may be-applicable are delineated. CHAPTER IV: INVENTORY OF POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS ·Identifies the tcxic pollutants present in the CSDCC effluent and compare~ their concentrations with applicable stand- ards and criteria for protection. of water quality. Describes the uses and effects of various toxic substance~. CHAPTER V: INVENTORY OF POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTING SOURCES OF TOXIC COMPOUNDS · This chapter describes the various consumer products which are commonly used in the home and the way they enter the sewer system. These various products contain a variety of priority pollutants which are identified by product types. Estimated con- sumption of certa~n household products entering the sewer system is quantified. Automotive product usage and disposal and recycling of waste oil is described. CHAPTER VI: METHOD OF TOXIC WASTE CONTROL TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL TECHNIQUES This chapter provides an overview of various treatment and disposal methods for toxic wastes and describes existing treat- ment and disposal facilities in Southern California. The environmental concerns, economic feasibility and adaptability of various treatment and disposal methods to the management of nonindustrial toxics are described and a summary comparison is provided •. CHAPTER VII: RECOMMENDED PROGP.AM (copy attached) A recommended program containing elements for identifica- tion, public participation, cooperation with other agencies and a suggested schedule and budget is provided. The major program elements call for integrating the nonindustrial program into the existing industrial waste program and designation of a Toxics Coordinator to handle this and other related programs. A budget of somewhere between $75, 000 -$100, 000 per year for such a program is recommended. This would support activities related to Round-up Days, data collection, public awareness, community forums, and a mobile display. Other ·in-kind support from other District departments is also anticipated to support the recorn- mendPd program. · APPENDICES: Five rather detailed appendices are provided which contain specific information for supporting the proposed project ·and providing back~round information, references, a listing of household hazardous waste programs, available recycling and treatment facilities in Orange County, and guidelines for implementating a household and small business hazardous waste collection program. 2 VII. RECOMMENDED PROGRAM· In accordance with 40 CFR Section 125.64, pa~agraph (d) (2), the Distr~cts' nonindustrial source control program must include (1) a schedule of activities for identifying nonindustrial sources of toxic pollutants and (2) a schedule for·the develop- ment and implementation of control programs for nonindustrial toxic pollutants and pesticides. These programs are discussed in this chapter. · A. Identificatiop of Nonindustrial Sources of Toxic Pollutants 1. Monitor effectiveness of other programs. 0 Monitor results of San Bernardino · Department of Environmental Health Services Waste Stream Study. 0 Follow up on SCAG' s North Hollywood Small Business Hazardous Waste.Study. 2. Mani taring /Re.search. 0 0 Expand scope of Districts' industrial program to include nonindus~rial sources. monitoring Dev~lop monitoring program to analyze domestic and small business wastewater effluent. Select representative nonindustrial drainage area and conduct sampling to characterize wastewater. B. Cooperative Efforts 1. Toxics Round-up 0 . Establish round-up days to collect household and small business hazardous waste. This day would serve to educate the public about the need to properly dispose of hazardous waste on a long-term basis while ridding homes of hazardous compounds. Such a round-up day has already been scheduled for April, 1985. The event is co-sponsored by the County of Orange and CSDOC and will take place in Huntington B~ach at the County of Orange Solid Waste Transfer Station on April 20th. ~ppendix E contains sepcific information regarding the implementa- 0 ~ tion of this round-up day. Investigate the feasibility of organizing a permanent collection program for household hazardous wastes at a safe and convenient pickup location (eg., fire station, recycling center,, landfill, etc.) An example of this program is San Bernardino's program discu~sed iri Chap- ter III and Denmark's program discussed in Appendix B of this chapter. VII-1 2. 3. 0 . ·.Develop a model household hazardous waste program tailored to schools in cooperation with other County agencies and community groups. Schedul.e a "clean out the schools day" for each school district in the county. On that day, students could be. educated about the proper disposal of hazardous products and school laborato~ies could rid themselves· of hazardous compounds. 0 0 0 0 Encourage private industry to develop a milk-run pickup for small businsses ·generating less than lOOkg of waste a month. SCAG is currently developing such a program for North Hollywood (see Chapter III) • Community Forum/Workshop Conduct a workshop for County organizations co-sponsor- ed by EMA, CSDOC, LWV, etc. At the seminar, appoint a Small Generator Task Force comprised of re·presentatives from public (city, county, regional, and state) and private agencies, organizations, and industries. The task force would evaluate nonindustrial source control program issues and concerns. Network community groups and provide them with public information materials. Requesting the public's assistance in the distribution of public information materials will aid .in the development of a community approach to resolving the potential problems posed by the improper disposal of household hazardous waste. Education/Awareness Programs Develop an ongoing public education campaign using the media (T.V., radio and newspapers), ·non-profit organizations, and other community groups to increase public awareness of proper disposal of liquid wastes such as solvents, oils~ paints, etc. The educational program should consist of three elements: 1. Development of educational materials, including: a. curricula for use in schools; b; brochure for public distrioution containing a list of household hazardous products, direct- ions for proper disposal of these products, and recommended alternatives to these products; · c. informational flyers and utility bill inserts to notify public about program ·services; d. bus placards advertising round-up days. VII-2 2. An outreach ~rogram to distribute educational m~terials. a. identify key community groups and leaders. Suggested groups include: ·womens groups, environmental groups, libraries, neighborhoo~ watch programs, churches, senior citizens. organizations and firefighters. 3 •. A major media campaign to notify the public about the project's goals and services. a. Distribute press kit and press release at a press kick-off day used t6 announce the project's services. The following are specific examples of educational programs which could be established in Orange County: Set up central educational displays at Plant No. 1 ·which illustrate what children and adults can do to help :r:educe the introduction· of toxicants into wastewater effluent and conserve water. The display could be set-up inside a trailer for mobile display at shopping centers, fairs, round-up days, et9. The display could be used to educate communities about ·round-up days, permanent collection sites and alternatives to toxic products. Encourage the use of elementary, secondary, and high school education materials on toxic wastes. The Golden Empire Health Planning Center (Sacramento, CA) and METRO (Seattle, WA) have published teachers' guides for grades K-12. These teachers' guides could be field tested by the Orange county School Districts. A program on the toxicity of ho~sehold chemicals should become a permanent facet of high school chemistry and lower education science and safety courses. See Appendix E, Attachment I. Conduct poster contests to advertise safe use and disposal of toxic products and alternatives to using these products. . Contests could be used to advertise round-up days and collection p~ograms. Develop an ongoing media campaign using local and regional newspapers, television stations, radio services, and utility bill inserts to inform the public of the nonindustrial source control program. (The Sacramento program found that 80 percent of the response to their advertising efforts resulted. from newspaper advertisements; the San Diego ·progr.am found that 33 percent (majority response) of their program VII-3 Source: participants responded to newspaper advertisements. See Table VII-1) • Work to~ards enactment of State and Federal legislation to prohibit the manufacture and use of·. specific toxic materials. Appoint a CSDOC Toxics Coordinator to be responsible for cobrdinating household hazardous wa~te projects and educational programs. The individual should be able to respond to individual requests concerning the safe disposal of household hazardous waste. Table VII-1 SOURCES OF REFERRAL, SAN DIEGO PROGRAM Newspaper 33% T.V. 19% Agency referrals 17% Water bill inserts 15% Radio 7% Garbage bills 4% Friend 4% Brochure/flyer 2% Environmental Health Coalition, 1984. SCHEDULE/BUDGET The activities recommended herein, if endorsed and approved (via a budget authorization) by the CSDOC Board of Directors, should attempt to be implemented within one year of program adoption. Depending upon the outcome of the initial succe~s of some program elements {i.e., Round-up Day, Workshop, etc.), the program can be changed accordingly to optimize or refocus its efforts. VII-4 The sampling and analytical costs for conducting sampling. can be. quite high depenc;ling upon the frequency and number of samples. It is recommended that a budget for the nonindustrial source control be allocated to support a program effort estimated to cost somewhere between $75,000 and $100,000 per year. It is envisioned that a technically educated staff person be assigned or hired to devote approximately· half time to nonindustrial source control efforts and the remaining time on other industri- ally-related toxics issues. It is logical to have this person assigned to the industrial waste division within the Operations Department. A summary of the activities undertaken as part of this program should be detailed in the CSDOC Annual Report submitted at the end of January each year. VII-5 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS APRIL lOJ 1985 -7:30 P.M. , r. ;1. I t / ~ I• I .. ; : ... l f ", ... Ii I 1·: I I: i"I I ~'' ( ::: :I:> I f--1 ::: ; 1 ·U~ 1-(,, ·.:.i:i.;u,1 I 7 .' 4 .. ?, : 7 -'· '' ,;:, 7 :• 4 ~. 7 .' 4 (: ~ 7 '! 1• '· 7 :x::o 7 !• 4 I ~; G"> rn '7 ~, ••••• :;::::: . J.'.41 ., t:::j . 7 .~ ,, ! 1 :I:> J 7 ~· ,, J ;:-· ......... ! .. , :. 4] :·. --i :. 7 j 4 J 4 rn t 7 .•. 1• 1 ~. ::3: l."1?.41t· :::i:t: ;. 7 ~ 4 J ., 00 . 7 .~ 4 1 ~· ~. 7 ~"' J •i I .t 7 ~ i+( ,, ):::a 1 7.1·4.d I ~~1..4.la;_;1 I ,.7 '! '•~."> t:::j '7 ~ 4; 4 ......... .17 ..'·" ~ :1 (/) i 7 ~J1 <'(, --i ·: 7 ,, 4 ,. 7 ::::0 r. 7:'.4?i'· ......... n I 7 ..'· 4 ~ 1 • --i I 7 ~ 11 7• ·, C/.) ~7?'•:'1 :17:'.'d2 7 ! '• .~"!- J• 7 34 .\11 ·I 7 ~It.~ r-, "7 ~ 4:( ': 7~11 !, 7 : 7 :.11 ~;- 7~·14 .~·t .. 7 3 IHt 'l 7 :· •1 11 1 7 .: 11'4;~ 1 :•. '* '• ... '.1~ .. 44 "7··.11 L. 'J I 1 "4 f. 7 4 '• ., ::: "1 I. I;~- J::::a I f--1 ::: !" u. r11•.t. -,JT I T.~I ... :·1 .. 11(•'( r.~ .. JL'•L ('I Iii, I 'r v !. :.; i;l}:\ C.i·f' L LI~ .. i ,; (.(:t{~. Art C f'i. I!. T ;, 1f2f ;• P. :: '•LI• 'JI Cl I· ':j r.· L L ;· ;,. f 1<t: t\') C c; , Jr~ (' • ·".f< t f. l I k : J 1,c11u!IJ 1r~~.1.nm~r..:1.~, 11.r. r.11 Ct:!·,, ~v·;Tt.:··s, ire. Id 1 · r f• C1 !-.11 c ' s ~ c ti p.q r JI L s • I "r. • .r. LL r-11.iu: ~. l?r r I er· :~1-u1 I kl' r •1. /I L L p :; T • T r V I· ti I C: l E ·~ , I f·, C • I\ LL f ~1 f U C Tr• J C f 0. f.LL""r~ ~.;l;·Jt.l.ASU;c C•'· ftLLC::T/,lL Jr..•c::l;"/f~Cf CO. /1 M ( 1~ IC !, ~· ('. ~; f FR [ ~ ~~ (•" C fl} .l'\~·•t:}(f,\ ~CJ! rHJFIC' p~nr..uCTf­ /ll-I r •q c :. ,, 11. c un c .H ~ 1 w;:: u I. : l t .., [ I I !. l: f 0 t~ 11 T I 0 I• 1 llt L~H'1:;1j1 P .!!CK I ~JC C.C1e 1·~l1'4 !•f.:. C1~rq .• f. ~. ,; n~.-r I c:r: 1· t I l·•C • torn. n1..1 1;.i1r1< not.IE$ ~· u~o 1 P··~ NT .t.~·~i.:HH•" -~·11.,ct~ -t-!f,f..Tll'f t <_.;.: 1iCJ i TI fll, Of t'UH CPfll 1/. ~.:) .c. •; !". o c • o 1 ' ; r F 1 r 1 A l. ,, N A L .., r 1 r u l·l<t< ':'C.HFfJF!1TIO!.' it.i<C.fJ t !'.u I! l'UJl Rf.I\ HL•:, H ( l(llJ.J" I ~::wsTPJ AL l'f! ~:(1!1 C::!.l\'i. ~ ~ HAVt. L, H.C. Ll.\ii.f, il1l1tJ<lilJf.L VfhHU c, I I I" ~ L Y ~ ~ -.: ~. C · C I A H ~ • I :. C • I· I f. ('(I' ;;r ·n t L r II. l•LJ.t1f, i.:f,f=flll ~ l('io'tJI. t•O!H,1~ ~.1:..c;i11r1n !~rr,v1cr. 111•r. 1·•11•1.,l t 1 .• ,:.r~111·iArJ ~: !l~,~oc., tr·c I" '-I · H: ~ t-• r J l (l J.. I I ~ ,~ ~ S I~ C • t I '. C • 111f 1 u•.~.1 Cl•l·~l'~rn H:r"~ rr;c.11,![Hl:-•C Cl. ~11.L1::.·. ''• ru1tf1: r.1 1 r c A I Ii: r.,ir..i ;. • I U' • c •.•• r.r.i .• I I ILL f.('·C.t=tii .'[ r ;. t. ! F n. t. ! ·, i. 1 i Tl• r r L L J ·:; 1 f; '.. 1 ·: r C' 11 l J f • " I I· I (. ~: J.L •• 'rl I. 1 ! I, I 1; L.t : i Y Ct"l t 1: · '.·Ii t. (l(·lt· f.1,. r. 1\ t· C (;, I !:r. r· ., .q 11 '; " I 1 t :. ~ :. ~ ,, ;."r r.: t' ~ T :7 C '• ', • 1 C ii , I '. l • r 1o -'I/ ' i.: ; • ; • • 1. • , I r, c • ~,,. :.; l 1 n PitoJ rt' ! .•s ( ( '·HH.l.''Sl~lb D/.l!" HJ 1"/f.'. I''· (. '( 1 ,•nu T r.ur~!\!:~ n-. . .., r' l s 1 .. I c r s 0,.. (I .. 1H• (, r (. fi ti N T y !·t. IU 1 ·~nON·._, t. M (.HJM 1 1~4.73 "~2~·· 'It! 1 .:>a !:1. t.~ 1 7 :>. tt4 :\.!• 14. l '1 t l 'J :>. •12 $ .\ ' .' 1) 4 • :> •. ~.lli.t.2lf i 1 ' ,, 9 ~ • 1 ,, t 5 ' ~J.'5 ·) •. -, .j t~ l '1 .... i 1 .. B1t.f,f4 '£5.~51.:~~~ "'tl2.6t; ! :?.H,. t.'I t.~ l .3P f.;J,b5l.~14 ~ l3t'H5.C:iA Ba.25 -·-----i 1 ~ ~ •. 3 2 i 1 ' , :.. 7 • ;; l 1 • ~. :i 'I. l 'l 11. Ii: ·t I q't. II." • 'l>'il .nn.1J1 .f.'f ~·. ,, il lij~4.fP. f .?~If. q ~'. s1,nA.!lf! i ~·,5 ~·. -.• ·:1 3 '• 75 •. : .'; n 1q.r:,i il.:?.S.4':1 :,.) , .... 12.~)q ].~.43.14 'i'H&.72 ! } t ·In 5 eh I~ 1.1.~1.l.'..lf I·\ H :1 • .. •.I ·J 7 ;> e '.I ,,,!.~l.t".7 J ) t • I ) • ) f; 'I 1. ::1 • .! tt l ') ~ r • ' . . .... - \.--1 b. ".' f: 1 J , ·• '1 I• 1 :_ f 1" ".~ ') s • ( •. rh ~Ct' If' TI C1r..i HARDWARE PARKING LOT STRIPING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FIBER GLASS ELECTRICAL REPAIR OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR VEHICLE LEASE CONTRACTOR PW-118 TRAILER RENTAL CLAIH SETTLEMENT COMPRESSOR PARTS LAB SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT PIPE SUPPLIES CHEMICALS ELEGTRLCAL surrLtE~ \lHJt1ltN°~RESSES CONFERENCE REGISTRATION SEMINAR REGISTRATION SLUDGE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES GRANITE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WORKERS COMP. ADMINISTRATION TRASH DISPOSAL OFFICE SUPPLIES ENGINE Pf\RTS ENGINEERING SERVICE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFFI 'cE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIHBURSEHENT WORD PROCESSOR TRAINING SEMINAR REGISTRATION REPAIR AUTOMOBILE NPOES/CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING PERMITS HAR DWP.RE REPAIR VALVES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT VALVE GASOLINE II\ ,1 ti ,1 ' J·· l'.I ) II I'' Ii: !•· iu. I .. , :I ... I 1" I" I" ./ ::1 ;.' "! ,.,· ,.,. '' :·· t. I I, I,' I 1·· . ' "' ,"( ;,,' I ::: ):> I N ::: .. liMJ rJ(1 .. ! 1, r'.;. r. T : . 1. ~ 7 .' !• '• '! ~. 7 '.'.45 ... 7 !:4~ 1 \ 7 :· '· !.. :; ):> ·: 7 "!. 4 ~ :'. G> . 7? 1•': 4 rn ,7 !·4!d: ::z ·_:7 7 ,4:;; '· t::j ... 7? '* ~ 7 ):> '• 7 ~ '• ~ ... ......... ;, 7 ,!, '• :. :1 --1 '· 7 :· 4 {-i 1 rn "1?'-fl 3 ·; 7 ~ 4t? ::t::t:: '7 ! lt(3 00 .!7'4~ .. '+ :1?tit'..~ 7~'·~J~ ):> ' 7 .1 · 4 t 7 I :'.7!4f~ I • 7 I 4 f q t:::1 I. 7 ;t.4 7'.I ......... :. 7 .:.·'l I J (/) •, 7 ~· 11 1:> --1 .. 7 ~·" 7 -~ ::::c ~1!.4111 ......... Cl '!7 ~· '• 1':: -I 7 ! 4 7!: (/) .: 7 ~ ,, ., 1 ·1~1·1~· :• ., .• 4 7t1 1! 7 :"'' t-.•• ·. 1:'" .. 1 • 7 :· 11}-; "]?Id.~ 7 '" ~ 4 ;•7 ~ 41 '=' ,! 7 !.4.l r; : 7: '· '· 1 ; 7 .~" ,•· •·. 7: t.. ····: '· 7,:.lt r:,, . 7 .' 1• -. 1 •. 7 ~. 4 ,.., ;: 7 :' 11 •1_' :::: . 7 .. 4 ·ii, :.:t:a I N :::: ( ·~p. i -.Ji i'I', I .::·,·r I' .• l"t.i IT•L Pf.i'of£S~J!~('. :n1r j/}'-./;..•, 1·.:..:;1 hll·<1:;1 1'.UMi~f·p ;,11;•, f .1,:._y, ~,HJT.:.1 !1i~J :1J:-.l-'lff~J :'IF C,i•/ii"t:F ri·IJl•JTY V! r,,, 1i' f••JL I· .. (;;.;1tl' " J ;. ! t r L • r • 1 I :, 1 f '" !'--f 1 (.I I Y CI .I • • 11 CL''d< ,·y 1 11f':f1 .. 1-f1f 1,: I L L I :. ~: ~·i • ( l '· :c II [ (O!o'..T f-14f l.CUIP~rr .. 1 r..1.~ .... , cc. , H.r. r.o•;t.q l c1·1 'lt!'(JI t_ T (' ·1 i1 -:: CL I! f T ~ f) r L f (. T f; Ir AL I I ' 1 • cur.:<";r)L J( r. Tl! IH H rti l!C' I CH:~ C r. I. r .:. f. l '. I i; H IJ I !H I t L CI)~. T I~. ! : ~ I .\ L I· t.i.J AT 0 k c n 1. • P 1 ,, ~ ~. l it t· v ~ r 11 v 1 r rs r r; ~. r t. ! : ~ : ; ~ A lJ T ll Fl-R I !; • l I\: r • i<. f • C·.~UL lfl; CP/l!.f F.f.l:l IL fOUl!lY d1i:l i.~AU fl fCH.IC f.!IU!!lf)I: ~. '""!.'C.Cltlf~ ct, L. ~J lt l. f' co u r·r T y n F r; r JI N r r CU;•Tl!I: ;d.Jiir~c;~ Sr1!.t>JllFJC: ~ .. rr TI i •I-r q H lllt II! ) /l f.1f' It. "f I ) I. J T 1,:1:;1! l.~. TIH :;; l<VlCc r.~Lrt•J ~,y•·1• .. ,.,c;, Jt:r. f)] ( .. sr• ! ! ~· ;. H Ty ,. R [of; UC: T ~ [ 0. r.J':1r.~~'il.1 ~·;.Sf( ~Y~Ttt.-:;, l;"f.• 1,10~·r.11u1 >' er .• , Jt1;C. r ,. 1 v : ~ 1 : · .:: l 1 r c c r 1: 1 :. P l!lJ;.::~ f Ii.•.~ l I ~.Jf.CT JM.- lJUt'r.t l f "'\. ;. ·•!= C: tt I • ru1 iiliT re. u 11 \/AL$ "'.t.LI~ Cn. 1 1. ·; L ;,. , , i: r. Lr.! r· !11. t -. , :,1111· ••. i i'i 1 ~ 1-· I . ~ :~ (J ~. I : ! I: ti~. ·r ,, l r. L ~. l i: v • [. : If • f l •t I l I f ;., r I J f " S IJF· r L ' r L ~" t' r: f, L I " . " £ ~ ·~ C l•I< r • fl1:!H '.t:.~:·.··[\lri-CC;Ll fr., lHl.'e IJ~[HI·,. '. i1,f.l!'-U 1 • I J ~ r t !' r.: C .i ' 1 ~ 01 ~. I l ~.11["f. '.f' I I L 111 I 1-(' :. • HJ I ~-\'~ ... I J(.;q cr·~,j(1d JI. f LI v:,-· ::r ... 1ric •• J.V • IL ) fl t:.:.:;111 IrJ .. ~;v<.T; r:~ )II ~\"· -i,,._r. CL:I t.!V 1 I f • J) ( • ( (. ll. Cl. j 1 ... :) I h J[ . ~ 120 I~~ t.F1l•WJ J ·t1 t4?6.:~4 i25.:12 ·1.<H f) • 1• 7 1111.1~ 1.1 fl'+. nf' 12n. 1:i Lt>"1 :i • .:; (! 177.l~ i) '~62.J1 1o ·~ • (I ') 2 • 4 :> Ll, ?14~. t14 H'> l • 76 1.llt.A7 i2u2.97 S.2t132.P8 !.24 6 •• !'-1 ! l t ;,') J •.Iv :i.349.t.rl i 75 •• .'!1 . ! l't9.t;2 $,'ilf • Q ~I ~37.~0 1-2 • 4 7 ·) • ::· " \If Cl 7 •':,~I 117.S."i~ !l l ';)::S ~. ~? :t l • " J ~! • :l !; :f.? 11. •. r, i.s,.:,11.1e 11 t 176 •. i6 '15 3 • n.i '11??.~f. 1 (,~ q. 7 f: '(. l ~ 7 •. ) (. l(,f, b. 7(l ·rt42.l? '~ 1 .) ~ • J ,• :H~i~'-•~~ t 4 t 'j(. 7 e J ~I ., :, ) :) • f "I ·1.s '1. ~,. 'I ~'l (!. •. r 17t ,7'j. 7r,. 'i 1 't ~. !•,> ~\,ti'~~.··H i ...... 7. "1• ( f 1 I <, C Ii I P T Jt1 f.J USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT EMPLOYEE MILEAGE CONCRETE HARDWARE EMPLOYEE MEETING EXPENSE FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECTION ENGINE REPAIR TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTIONS PUBLICATION TRUCK REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS CRANE RENTAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CSDOC Hl,6,7 MASTER PLAN UPDATE WATER SOFTENER RENTAL PERMIT 'FEE LAB SUPPLIES PUBLI CA Tl ON LEGAl ADVERTISING TRUCK PARTS COMPUTER SERVICE SAFETY SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS APPRAISAL SERVICE DRIVER TESTING TRUCK REPAIRS PAINT SUPPLIES OFF I CE SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS PI PE SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES PELIVERY SERVICE PAINT SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS LAB SUPPLIES ASPHALT CUTTING CONTRACTOR PW-132 PUMP PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES (. \I 1"'1 I "1 ,, .. "I !::1 .·'.1 I .. ;, :.1 l:. ·1·" ,, •;• 1: ;.; ;,: 1:::1; '" ':1 t' , .. :1 i·"1 ! .~i ·' ''i ' ....... I\ )11 ::: :t::a •• \.N ::: FUNO tl!O ( ~ 1q9 -J T [JI s T u~ H\ 1 '~ t. c;. r I T 1. l ( I f·OCL~5 l!~f: [1;.Tf. Hl'·/H" '!,f,l_ PfFO~T ~UMP(~ Arq5 --··-·---·--· ·--~-----r•;iJl•1lY ~."d-llf·llliN £11ST~ICT:) Of fil:H:uf rr.utnY l.ll.Rfl.At.T t.o. \' f il.l-(>I\ ~ 11 !l7.3'+95 FRUIT r~ot.:t:J<~. LAUORnuRv, 1r.c. --0-7~4-%--------·-C-HY·-·OJ.· F ULLE~ lON·-- 07~497 tY hAJNJ(N&NCE, INC. 1)73498 GAf~At•L LU~l-1ER CO. ID "ll .. 11 t7345~ &•~ CHF~ ~AOOUCTS t INC. :t::a 0135Ci0 Gf.f,EPU Tt:LHHCJt~E CO. ~ 073501 Glf ~LICh-MITChfllt INC. 1 ~~~-G-1~5-02--------W • ... --Gk :.11.;Gf P. t · l Nf·. I I:: t::j 0 73 5 fi 3 c. C o R CE T • H. L L C 0 • :t::a 0 7 3 5 0 If . t-i I\ L I' F. H; ~Ur-H Y C 0 • II -·---· 07~505 -·· · ---------11.\L~ Tf r: 11. HOGGAN, ·I NC• .. ........ ----i 01 3 5 fJ 6 TE 0 A • fi A I":-< f TT )llO rn l\73ec.7 tHIHUtH~TOI'\ Jt~OUSTIH Al Pl ASl JCS 11 ~ -0-1-3-1Ht8----HASTY HI F~~ENT·--------- ==It: 0 7 3 5 C 9 H E H SE Y · r R tH 1 lJ C H. , I N C • 00 IJ7351C HILTit It.JC. ---0-1-3tl1---------HOUSl -f;f 1•.t.TT£.f1If!:·--··· -... I~ I C.73512 CITY OF ttUtHWCTOf\1 t!C:ACH IJ )114 JI )iu 14 C L I I 11 S J:-A I 0 I 3 I ~ .1 I h ') J.f-PlU!~ 1 13 1. '.!I 'f.2 3. \ 'l 'J.lf 1. ~ 7 i~t214.bb ·f. 1 , : ;A ,) • ~·ti $7,)1)7.91 S. l 1 5 , .I A 9 • :? 't --i9·l•H i-2~6.?4 'HCJ7.Jn l.'t9't .64 :t. 2 J , j 6 1 • ~· r~ 1378.bA . ------·------i3q('. 71 tl36.70 $153.32 ·---·--$ltl59.~0 f.6t325.77 U • .31 ·' In :t::a C7 3 51 3 ti u N TIN H 0 '~ ~ [A c H Ru e BE.. p s T t. H 11 4~H-lSGO-COMPAfliY------------------------------·----. ·'l 126. fH·-·- 13'k'l1 .1 (j \51f.~5 \12~.7'+ $9 3. 7 c '-38 t. 2 P. . I 073!'i15 IMPER I /IL lJE.ST OIEMI CU CO. t::j 0 7 3 !116 HID ll ST P I A L AS F 11 ALT -·--·--073!H7--------JNUUSTl~JAL FIH & STf[L--JI ........ . , 11 (/) CJ 7 3 51 b HJ 0 US H I ~ l TH PE 11 Cl l 0 f' R Cl() L' Cl f .1 1 ---i 073519 INGHAM PAPEP. n »f>21} J.N--~l-ACE ~t.CHININ~fO.·--- N n 073521 HJSTRUl·:[t:tATlON LAAOR/ITO~Y,Jt:c .. 'I» ---i 073~22 HJTEPtJ/.TIOtvt.L lECHNCLClGY l' --(;/). 073~.23 ·------rnvINE ilAt~Ch WAH~ PISTI< lC T· " 073~24 TH[ JANJTCR'S SHOPP[ .i I.., 0 7 3 5 2 5 J E N Sf N TG C l S ~ A L L 0 Y S n --t>7~5:.:>E,-----G.( .• --Jf PSON OJYe·-----· ' 0 073527 h.P. Jfl!N Ill.UL Jl\IG .d' C73!'i?B JONES CllP'ICALSt lNC. II 07Je.29 . -KA~~t.r~ HAl?H~c.s & SUH'L'I 4J C73531} l<AS SAHTY ~~por1UCTS 4' 4/ .. I> )IJ ... .. , .,, ~ .. , ll 7 3~31 l<f.UiAN r n·r ! ~;UPPL y r ('. ---·{!-7-3!)32------I< I NC~l l\11 l f\;G, I r.ic;. ~73~3~ KLtE~-Ll~r CPR• "735~4 l\Nf'X ll!UU<.T~IAL !:llf·i;Llf~ 0 7 '535 L ~ r.; lJ!H r <HH1 ~I.JI J L'f c (, ~7~5~6 L•J•W•\•t l~C. P.7 3537 Lf IH1r~ NfOl (l 1 HJC • -0 7 3 5 ~. U --------· -l i:' \.i C 0 i-LI rl I• I C r. 0 • (17~~39 LI ':ti TI I : ~i J q HI HI HI t' ~ t If, C. ::: 07:'1!'1lf!.l :t::a Lil.LY lYi'["..(lllfvt, . , \Al ~~,!-~~-::: .. -------! 4 ' 81 !I. il !J S-89 :> • 4 't :l-95 4. ·;o $4.llff .1. l •)3 • r;9 $1)9e IJlj $ t tS26. 3~1 $2,612.H7 s.2.~01.r.;6 :f.94.6'.1 .'114 3. •;:) :tt.725.~C $4tlf.l:felf' :fq fl. •16 '!Bl.1 ? SJ,rH2.t-1 'i.2.:Ple't7 i.-S 3. '•.~ 1 7 iJ 2. r.' l t l ' ~ 11:,. ;· t :J 11\ ':l. a:. 1: r; C:: Sf f< l P 1 I ~H~ LAB SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE REPAIR GAS PUMP LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES SAWDUST - TELEPHONE BUDD CHAIN ----BOILER PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS VACUUM TRUCKING ENGINE PARTS ------------TRUCK REPAIR VALVE'S HARDWARE BATTERIES WATER USEAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES ·-~t ~k'\lfA~ HlUO~\ bFf ASPHALT TOOLS HAROWARE OFF I CE SUPPLIES REPAIR ENGINE LAB SUPPLIES COMPUTER TERMINAL WATER USEAGE JANITORAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PW-083 SAWDUST CHEMICALS BEARINGS SAFETY SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES BEARINGS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PROPANE UNIFORM RENTAL WELDING SUPPLIES FILM PROCESSING TRUCK REPAIR ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PRINTING ( 11 _, . ' ):1 )• i" I'" .... •'' ,'• 1·· !.'! 1 1,. .'I J:: • i·' 1:.: -·I 'I I I .. , :'i ... .. : .. .I : ·! '"' "' I ,1 :::: ):> I ..i::-:::: 1-l.INO t.O '1 1 ~' ~ ~ J T Ii I S 1 ~J C f, I<. J r: 1.. C A I I l J. l I I• 0 er f. :) J r;(. 0 t. I r 3 11 ~ 0; '.:.. • 111.r H F (j ,q t.ll M l1 f i.• A I· 4 :.'· l . ~ r11.•~d't St···Jl/'1)11~-: DISTtdflS OF OPl•Nct f(lll~ll" 1 • VF r1LOr• L I P-! l T 0 I ··; lJl C 0 R I • , -· 07-351f2 1~~. (l7~54] IU (.7~5/t3 1111 C7!~'tq L 0 C l>L A G E. IV f Y F ll R f.1.6 T I 0 !\,; C lil-il' ,_,ACJI TlilJCK~, t PiC • t-'11 L C Ci f' I· I Ii ~ 1 t t I NC • 11·--:i:::-(173~45 11, G"> 07 3e.H) >1··1· rn 073547 I\ Z_(il.3.S4P. ..... f-'. A MH N L T f C: t; N 0 l 0 C. I f S , 11\i C • MARVtC ~LECTR~~ICS M c c 0 y s • t E E T ,., E 1 A L w cm j( s • J I. c • LA~RV ~. MCll~O~E ~C~ASTf.P-Ci~~ ~UFFL~ CO. ~llC~ELL ~ANUALS, l~C. 0 r.73549 )lul :t:> on~so ,_ ...• !-:::":t .. 07-.3551 ..... _. __ ... MUl'Jl Hk., H!C.. rrl 073552 fo!OfHGOMF.ln rlfVATOP COl-'PMO ::3: 073553 MORGAN C~l.~!E. co., Jr.iCe r-----u-~54---------MYrRS-T llH Sl•PPL Y --·-· ::i:t:: (\73~55 NATIOtUL rILTfli ._,lOJ~ COH·. 00 07~5~6 RORERT N[AL ·--i--ll7~~57-... -----NE\,;.1kK (l[CJROr~1cs. 073550 CITY o~ NEwPORT OEACH ):.::a 073559 NOkHl~f.ST MOTOR W(lllll\!G, JU:. r.---L---0-1-3-560-OCC I-nE ~TI. L CtiOH-C AL .. -f.Ol4P. I [173~61 OLYMPIC CH[MJC/tl CO. Jl1' t::j 073562 O. C. AFFl~MATJVE AfTJON lll )I .)In ll JI .Jll\ :i..i JI , .. l:ra l'J 10 ,; I" 11 u II l~ ..,/ -.t-:-:'!1-(;7..3563----~-·---·-OflANG( Cul!~T·Y C.H[MJ CAL CO. ~ Ci7356lt ORANGE 'VALVE ~ FITTING CO. ;::c C73565 ORCO BLOO CC1., INC. , , o 7 "S66----or.: J.Tf >e ·-C OR r c-1 r.73567 O~YGfN SE~VlC( --1 C\7!56A COUNTY (jf OPANCE ~---013.Sf.9 ----·--CO. OF OR HJCiE. -AUD IT ff< CONH liU, 073~70 COU~TY S~~JT~TJON Dl~lRICT ~73571 O~ANGE COUNTY UATER OISTRltT I 0735..72 E .• w.~ ... --PRJNTINC----u·-·--- r73~73 FACJFtr ~LChANICAL ~YSTfrS <:73574 J..Aflfll C\HflY £fiUlfKf~T Co. !17!~75 Pftr, TS V.LlEITED 073~76 F[NRIL OATA CO~MUNJC~llO~S cor n 7 3 '5 77 r n. () )( I (; t T J ti f.,; ~ y ST [M 5 • I N (' • ___ Q 7.3 5 7 8 J • n • r I: I l L H' !, 073579 ro~rMi~Jt~ (t7 ~,!'.~(1 ~735~~1 li7~·~H2 11 7351-!3 1------' .l-3.!:.lHf :::: :t> I f·7~~~~ r. 7 3~f f: Fk[~TlC~ rrruk~TN& t A H a L n ,, H J ~ ,, (l f ! J c [ f. A J NF (IL. 11 J S Hi S /IL C (' • Th f 1-c[ c, J ~'Tl r1 --------RL'tt~(;ll; Al.lH;HwM sur·PL't rn. P.Ir:!t-. ('lPF f.' C11 Id F~ ::. r, ?·I Y f ~ S "' ..i::- . U :::: ( --' L,L__ _________ . . f l /, I ~·: ~ I· f, I 0 :1 ,\ I? 'I / ~ ~. AM OU;\; T ilf'lC;-..JFllON 1. l , b 37.,. 3 VALVE ~?51'l11 11 f LAFCO PROC FEE-ANNEXATION NO. 2-60 t-~75 • 1~~ TRUCK PARTS \7,587.~H ODOR CONTROL CONSULTING U.:J.S6.15 ELECTRICAL SUPPLiES 1, 121 • 7 ~ ELECTRICAL SUPPL! ES • q :l6 .3 f1 DUCT WORK 1-2:?7 • !i~· EMPLOYEE HI LEAGE l 615. 2~· TOOLS ·f. t :SA• Df HANUALS n n. H ELECTRICAL SUPPL I ES s.32 a. 4 b ELEVATOR SERVI CE U%. 7~1 SIGNAL CHARTS f.223.67 ·-·· -·---TRUCK PARTS uw.2~5.3q FILTER BELT i ~:!R 0 • 1Hl CONFERENCE REGISTRATION $1t2·l6.Jf:. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES lH • 2CI WATER USEAGE . f·27 Ci. :1 Ct WELD I NG SUPPL I ES __ .. ______ -----.. i4,19~eH'I· .... _ .... -----------CHEMICALS J. !:> lh lf 1 q • K 1 CHEMICALS S.S 5. -l(J HEMBERSH IP FEE :li63. (,fJ t23.'l7 llt120.32 ..... ______ i2,815.:.r.fr.---- !5t736.74 s.2.162.111 · ~ H t27u. ·~li 1.792.•11) 1.481.~2 . ·----·----. u • 1 !J3 • 2 fl -- $ 2t'l29. 2 I 'f 77 5 .... 3 ,1,a~<J.11t i 15 c. :1 l1 ! 1 'f ' d 1 ,, • f. ll l 2(,.) ... ,,, , 2 ' '; t• :; • '; l• i~ ,1 • f-. Ii ii; :1. 1l' f.3<) 5 •I: !J !443.~~4 'ii.; If. 1~ I 2'J ft• 11' 11,1"~.';l ( CHEMICALS PIPE SUPPLIES CONTRUCTI ON HA TE R I AL S -----TRUCK PARTS OXYGEN CONTRACTOR 2-24 GATE FEES -'COYOTE CANYON REIMBURSE WORKERS COHP. WATER PRODUCTION ·· ··--·-· · · -·--· -----· --PR I NT I NG CONTRACTOR J-11R SAFETY SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL REPAIRS HYDROGEN PEROXIDE HONTHLV DEMAND REPORTS POSTAGE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE TRASH DISPOSAL LEGAL ADVERTISIN~ ALUMINUM COPIER LEASE PllMP PARTS ( "' I " "1 ., "j I.,' I . ..I I .1.-:i i:-: !·' i·' I.. : I 1.:1 ;ii •: ::1 I I I"' I'" II 1:: i . ., (•I I :::; '.I i·.::·1· ,, '. II ..... "" I:: .1 ,,I I Ir. ... ,,1 i'' I'"' I'' l:1i :::: J:::a I U1 :::: J:::a G> rn 2 Cj J:::a --I rn 3 Li! :tt: H oo C· I l "i . :·~;! J:::a I r- i) t::j '·· -(/) -I ' ::::0 ,.,._ .. 1 n .. I --f l l:'i (/) "' I 1,,1• .. i::; 1·• I' ;.·., :::: J:::a I \..Tl :::: ( FUM; ~;n ;,:/.hf\ Lr. T •:1• • l 7"!r·F7 r.73~.;,i( :· 7 ,' '-f. r, ~,!~''·~· ·:.1.>.~.·.11 I 7 ! ~ C.;' i 7 ~~ r r,?: [ 7 ~~.44 : 7 3!'';~ 1 7 ~ ~ l.f, :7'!':.<:;7 :.r 7 ~·~'Ji.\ ., 7 ~.I-r-;c.. h 7 JL;!~! ~ 7: (· t ! ;7:.,~2 :. 7 ?. ( : ... ~ ' ''.:·, :.. 'i ': 7 ~f,I 5 1• 7 ~(..~:f, .. 7 '!. (. '• 7 1' 7 "!.( 'H ;. 1 :~LI·'• r 1:•1.1 : ; 'nf 11 ;. 7 .'.f. \' l 7 :~t p ·7 ~,. 14 .: 7 "!.f 1 <', 7:'f.lf. .. 7 '?of-] 7 117 .~f.] A 7 !,.( l q '7.' •'<· l 7.~t;.·] '7 !. t·;· :' ·-7 ,, t ~ -~ ::7'!1.;:4 I 7 "·Ii'':' 7 .' f,; f· 7 ',!,t~7 7 ~· ,,: ~ 7 ~'l ?'• :. 7 '· • :, ~ 'i7 !I· H -' 7.'1.:.;· ( ':1rc, ··JI '."l~.1 ~.i~1.-<:p•; Lr.f IPL HUIT~'.f.l"~G f;Alf 3/1 11/1•1." l'IGI 1; l f · fol( 1 ~,UM t; ('~ t. r It ~ C .. 1!r,n ~tj .. Jlf.J 11-.r-; PJSTt-lCT~ OF (l1-;1,1u: C:(IHHY \d ,,,,(q~ ,Jo·· t i t! 1 • 1 'Y t t< '. c r._ •. s r. ~. , 1 1-r • ~·~ i• i,. T £. I.. :·,I< I l [ ( r I! J C ! :C 1 1.1, ~ !'.f : ;;· ~, ~ 1i ~ 1· Ul II :. (. l, • !> f ii•: Oh ~. I( , Ti! ( • ~:-· I I. ;.: I· J f I' " l 1 • • J= l Y !'.t1r1:HlH· ~ :.rt•J11I f1Y (f·. ~I·· l l t-:-t ''l i' y ((1. ~.M Jn. I 11 L ;, s urr l y' J Nr. !,fJL •~1.t; :: C;i(r·. s I) l• T. r ;L\ ": 1 t• Ft 'r [ l ll ll Jr>,, I r T ~l!t:Thfl.I·! Ct..t.Jf. l(1}<;0tJ c:r.. sn. CAllf. tt.Ttt~ lC. ~; '~ l • ., t ! r I· ~, C C u ~. 1 J F S (1 J l C o. Sll.i<t<UTT~, lll<Jl.1Klf4G l.fLHt< ~.i'1'<·L1r1i 1'.'.lP!Jl-T~lT fl'. ~~ T ;:1. G\J ~. Ht l ~C~TT ~Tf'JI:·.<, ~u~·:n ~.Jr.t:l ~. U i· l LC f. • I r. C • T 1'1 f s u r. H I r ;, ~ ~Ii r. V LY C '' ~. ~· FR V I Ct C P. ~v=:t-.f,tJ • ft·'.lli Tt.i< TAY.ilf.Jrt T :.. i. !• Y t •, >. J 1.E f F IM(, LU H•d•Y r11{:t-:rs,111~ L:·rr.;llti' r11. ·T!l/.l,~,tot.tHJf.' lll.Lt11Jt.l, lfH .• yr·rr~r.r.t.11rr. 1; .. c. T ~~ -. './ l L T t. :, \I r l T '' U (' ~ ;; A. lJ T I.. ~ U F t L Y • Jiff • .J.(. Tl•f..-[f: f'. ~Ul\t l\Ce lrn ~ ['f·J r h){ f .. I f<t l•. I NC' • ,. I( .: !·I( I; I. 1 I : \ l F~ I (i 11 I 1 I l c i l • i r r t. I I f • u "' 1 r r c '· 1• 1 u L ~ . .i 1< v l n ltMTTf.tl 'l'·ll~ t<,UJF. ((•., JIC. I' P1 l Tr ~ < T ;. 11 ~ I '' f 1: f r.:1.J t. [ .... v 1.1 , ~ r I ' ; .• T I t I r I., !1 L. L t Y C I T I ! ~ ' 11 i• I I Y C ( · • v " L ~ r ; s T ' ·-L ~ u 1 n ' r: r .• r.1 !'. td 'I!.;: : 1·r.r v I q r. (; r 1: I I ~·It T ~ ,. ~: T if s ' II I • l t. J !· ': ;. .• L I< r " r, ' (, r I I T t :' ' J ' ( • l. t.1 L ;:. r i ' 1 1 r ,{ • 1. ~· .. 1 n" '' " • ~,._, L i '-'. l ,\ I 11\ r '-..I ' r 1 :. }r I ~. fF \' )( ! I· 1J ' C l ' I I'~ I A I r1 ,; 51 ;> : · I ~~ : i /IMOUi~ I ·t'l5.4~ i.'H2. r:2 t\94.1~ "'. ., .5 3. l ~ i~~.1:-•. ~1 'f.~.25'.J.21 l'tlA.~~·t. qi;p.qq ,.,, 1'17.'>11 $54 ". ;i:> J.l.Hi,i:ca1\.C~4 f. B • 'l 1• it~.72;).:5{1 ~E\A3.~4 i l '::> 4. ;! ~ !i 7 ;j CJ• 1 f., $72.16 tUE..2~ ~576.lq lit ,535. 3~ n21.4~ L·~ ·11. 75 Sl1l'IAu.'.I! $3,941.~B 11%.:!b !6fi.•H t,3Y,4~2 •. 10 i1q~:..n::> $ l ' fi 6 1 • l 1 u u.115.~;5 $ 2 '2:; 0. '.~ 11 u~,A6fu2lf s. ':> ' :::· 1 !) • r:, ,; l l ':) .5 • B "/ l''• 7. r.;~ I ".4 ~. f-h :f, 1 t 11 1 • r, l j 2. ~5?.. f: j :£ ~· , a!. t· • ;, '• 1 ..... 4:? l. '· 7 ~ 1 I. ~I, ~:? 3 •. , '· 'i·l ~ t!:>H,. H: i ) ' ;~ r; 6 • l .~· l -~ ~ '). ~· 7 1 l ' ~ ~ :· • '• 7 iJl S ( ii I PT I :H\ STEEL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TOOLS ' ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES HARDWARE TRUCK REPA l·RS CONTRACTOR PW-119 PIPE SUPPLIES BIO CULTURES TYPEWRITER REPAIR POWER WATER USEAGE DIESEL FUEL BOTTLED WATER ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES STEEL EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ALUHINUH LAB SUPPLIES HARDWAP.E HARDWARE LAB MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPING PUMP PARTS E~PLOYEE TRAVEL EXPENSE PAINT SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL REPAIRS AIR FARE TRUCK PARTS TOOLS ENG I NEERING CONTRACT NO. 5-2 6 CONTRACTOR PW-121 'GASOLINE DELtVERY SERVICE VALVES PIPE SQPPUES LAB SUPPLIES HARDWARE VALVE EMPLOYEE MILEAGE FREIGHT CHARGE~ P2-23-6 CLAIH CONSULTING PUHP PARTS ODOR CONTROL TRUCK PARTS ( -· " ' ;:1 ·. :· ) II .... , .. ·I <I '·.I 'I ·. I· 1:: :.: I I I . '1 '•I :·1 :; :· ,::-. '• "I I 1:1 I. j·I, 1 .. ! I:·:'. I !" , .. . (i I 'i ::: :r:::a I en ::: r ur:L: r_(l ·; ! · · c -J I L'.J :d ·,.-1.1 re l r' I C ! I I T It f G ('f ~ r.: If·!(. IH TF ~ / l ~ I l!' I ;. \: I '· f (, I\ T I'' lH1 ·H~ H ~I· !. ~ r 1 d·lt ~:.:t:ITl•ilt.1 ·J ;-·JSTJ.JCTS ni: (1i-'H·(~f r llll!TY ..,: L :.: I< :. ;1, T \ :. • .. 1 /.fl~ i :1.H •. 2"11 :. 7 _I., f, ( ~, ' 7 :: !:. f· . 7.<.f. 1 :J:::a 7 ! t H Cl> rn z Vt t · 1. r, l· ·' • I.I f(~;.:::tdil'· rc:r·~ TH:f T lfl' l.I! <; JI j, I " Jr-. f ;~ l l l f. Y r (Jiii, k.f I~ r (" l.•f' Uf F )' .. ~ (:'.( ( ·)f, ! l C • I. (. i f ;.. 1 , l t ~ t: ~· ~' (' (' I /, 1 ,-~ ? I I I l 1 · f (1 f. I .,. I ~ F• ~: n i. r.; r l l l ' If' S r /.. 1 i 31? ! / 1• '-1 Afo, GLHJ J i:?,H9~ •• ·!' I? :1 f. • 1(, i 1 ;• ' ll =1 ii • 11 1 t '* '?.'j 7. ') f J !:d 1. ~if• ,-.q2.~.4(, t:::j T fl T f. t r L I I h :-. r ,, 11: :.1 ;· . It;!:. 11 t •·'tSt"76. H :r:::a .......... -I rn 3 :;:t:: 00 SUMMARY I #I OPER FUND ::X:::. #2 OPER FUND I #2 F/R FUND I #3 OPER FUND t::::1 #3 F /R FUND .......,. #5 OPER FUND C/) #5 ACO FUND ;dn OPER FUND .......,.#7 F/R FUND nu1 I OPER FUND ~JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 3/20/85 ::: :r:::a I O'l ::: ( ================= AMOUNT $ 16.31 ~.633.50 657.30 11,522.98 l,Bla5.95 1,390.94 8,866.24 5,299~16 2,316.85 6,302.65 .. 514 1 562. JO 1,192,512.35 2 ,332.18 91,774.oo $1,844,032.51 ( r.u,ri U· 1 Jlil~ REMODELIN~ SERVICE HARDWARE LEGAL SERVICES COPIER.LEASE VALVE TEMPORARY HELP ( ,.i I I 1 1i "I i ·:1 '·.·· :"I .. :j ~· '.I ;., ... l:i 'I I· 1,,, " ··1 ... , i ... , I'.''.! •I 1 : . .I iJ I I ·; . '.! ., ..... er ::: ·to I 1---ll llr ! 0 :, (. :::: . ( h:•'• I·~/.~ T I'(•. :t:> G') rn ··:z I t::j :t:> .......... ' -f rn .,3 i .. ::t:t:: 00 'I ! .. :t:> ., I 1· r- • t:::::1 .......... . (/) -f I :::::0 I,-:~ ,·, ·j.:, "· iJ I''• I, I• ... -f (/) :::: to I 1-l :::: . 7 .~:'f 4 ;. 7 3:?f ~ t• 7.!:..: Cf :1:~:?61 •·7~U.fs ~· 1 ~ l!f:'i '1?. '21i' i 7:'2-71 :n:?n l·7~;>73 i 7 3~>H (1!21~· :·1~?7£ n !~·11 •7!.~71'4 ,,73~·7° :1-s~k~ i; 7 :' 2 f.l I 7 ! i:f'2 11"/!?P3 li7~·2f'lf in~H· I 7 ~flflf. ' 7: :'F 7 ~7 '!-';"<· ; 7 ! ?e<:: : 1:~;:cn I 1 =~ :H-1 :7 ~ :;ir.2 ;l 7 3:.•t",~ 1!7 ~7"4 '• ., 3:~<;.!) ;' 7 :~:H>f: '·1.~ ~G 7 . .. 7 ~ :•'.•t< .•"I '!-('nQ ,1 7 ~~ ~.I ~· . 7 ~.~q f. 7 3~,·2 :' 7 .3 -i.t·~ :·7 !-'! ~"• -, ~:' t !> . 7 .! ~ i (: 7 ! .1 :: 7 t ., ~ "! ·.]• ~. 7 !-~ •.• g ( ( n 1' ,1 -.IT 1 ~. l \.. ( '!' " I :1 : • r .H. T r :. l I· .. c rt' ~ !> 1 re. i.i !. l r .•. / · J 11· 1 ~ r i. u f; l i 0 .~ 1 ti UM Ll [ R A I '' ~ u· u r .. 1 ., (' A L I 1 .A l I c N rd s HI l c T ~ 0 F Ci r. t.r ( ~ (' r-u :,. TV ".'f ''•'O!; r,, f 11 c 111 1 1 ,., • 1 p. i.~ H: r • cn~r1.. r.1,c;,:. JUl• Pt.fl!:., 1~,c. r nut,• n :. 1 c. u s 11 t c l L r c 1 1, .a r CFH'WN ffNCr t ::.lJPF·LY cc• •• lll:C. Cl·l ~.4 Tf ~ f.ft.ff If ct,LJf:·q~l~ or 1 '..i l ~ 1· 1 ~-~ F 1 H r.. J fJl (l) c t< ~ 0 ,·. <; DJflllffn tSSOCIATfS 0 f• I~ t. D 0 rfJ Tt f: f-ii J $ E ~ • 1 fl(' • 11Uf,'I\: El~~1.rir.~ f(;~p. D 1 Vtl!' < :.u.; U·. [ A ~; T r~ A t· , I i-; f • l i~ (. ~1 A N H I! , It J C • FE~fRAl [)~P[S~ rrRr. FJSfH[~ i f0~TlR C~, f L q t VfF TI Cll l C OU Id TE r L c -! v s 1 r :·' ~ r.. ~. fl0Rr~ RfNT~LS f 0 I<~ UL k P f. , 11\ C' • FOUhTAlN V~LLEY C~~fR~ C'JTY OF rt•ur.11\HI VHLfY C:.01 ilLD L. fO)I ~; ASSCClAHS T11V FO'lr(·('IJH; COM1 A!l.Y u.r . .\~:L LU~fof i; ro. GE~E~~L r1~rtN( co~r. GEtJEflAL [LICTf.tJC CO. Cfl·lfRAL T~-l.Utf\j("'t CC', Gli:ffLlC:h-Jo'.JHtill.lt I~:C. H~ C:t-1 Cf,PF /.NV Gff:l.Cf T. t·tll ('0.· H£Lr~1~ sur~LY re. 11Jlfl, lh;C. t!O':LYWfllt Tf·,C. tlOL~f f,f It !T[f I U, F: • ~ • ~· l.ll, 11 I ~ C 0 • , I rir • tlll'd H~rJp, f [ HH ~llr'H;.. ~ T 0'l'F ~~~ll~LlC\ ~UffLY hY ·~"IT D rn :· lj s T p I .\l ' t-t f' i. A IJf. r; r· r-ll r. I; c T ~: t 1~ :;r.; IM t' /'. ;.' r I Ttll dA l'\ IT o;; 'S ~·11(1pf !" .J ;') \ : . .. r ~Ir. :.: ' l AL • . • 1 "! r • I< • l I • C Co ~· I : ~·' Y I'. I ~ t · 1 :, J · I • . , I I\; C: • i< LI I•; " LI :·1 I. C ldci C LI fl·<: r A Jr• .d I •. t. I h ~ AMOurJT tl8':it4jb.7'"J 1 4 :~?. ,. 4 i.87~.~.i! i2,8t.l.'ttt fUd ... ~. :l32 .1 •• (, 11 '5~ il. ·1 l. 'I .1 1 j. ') (: 1(,3 ·'. bfi 1'J,350.LD 12•} q. ~.q 't2.).3. 7!.-: !2t7.33.~·u s.3,5au.·•l. $5 3. H f9tfil~.1~ 'l 2P 't. 7f) Sltl44.f'~ 193:.1.42 $5~., .• . l125.11 UtlJ5.e!l 1h25. :. f. tl?.9.?6 1·~78. 7~ 1.2, & • '•5 $~J.n ~2t5~6.f:t! $65,'t(,3.~1 1.41.(,(1 lb 'J •. • 2 :\ 2t13. ~" .t55.1~ 1':!17.78 ·t:!2!J. 'U L7'tq.:u, ~.3 (, •. " 'i-b 3." 4 $ ~' , 5 'H, • H :. ll5u. 7't 'ill~.'.\~ 16i'1.? :· l '• ' .:~ 3 6 • 7 t 1 I P , ': 'l 5 • '\ :" 'l ~·j 2 ~ • ~~ ~· !']'.:J'f.~'f orsri\1i:-11of\! CONTRACTOR 3-21-3R TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FENCE INSTALLATION WATER SOFTNER RENTAL ANNEXATION #103 PROCESSING FEE RELOCATION OF WATER & AIR LINES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PRINTING PLAHT #2 REPAIRS PAINT SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS OFFICE SUPPL I ES OCEAN MONITORING DELIVERY SERVICE PIPE SUPPLIES ASPHALT CUTTING PUMP PARTS CSDOC #2 MANHOLE REPAIRS LAB SUPPLIES FILM PROCESSING WATER USEAGE SAFETY CONSUL TANT' ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES llARDWARE· OFFICE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TEJ.EPHONE BUDD CHAIN ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES HARDWARE ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS OFFICE SUPPLIES HARDl'/ARE ESSENTIALUBE SMALL HARDWARE OH ICE SUPPL JES .JANITORIAi. SUPPLIES CHLORINE ENGINEERING 5-19-R-l BEARINGS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES i:.I 'I 1:'. ''I ':'! ·:1 ;,., 1,:, I ... II , .. , .. ':o "I :•! i•I .,1 "I I··· I'.'. !"' i· .. 1·' 1:1 •' :·;II " ·! .. ~ "" ::: to I F N L't·•l! U1 ~.1·;c; -Jl ."ISl l'dd.fj;;· CAflT•~L I tfl ~~J!,: r..'\Ti: ?/ .. lit''. t·MI ::: r: I ; t,· f. I r.. f; ~ T I,'( I • 7 !J 1 l' I 7 f> )Q ,. 7 5 li; '. 7 ! 21 :1.. 7 "',. .,,, ::r;:. G"> rn :z .. t::J II :c> ;,.,, I ......... .11 --1 I· ~ (' -=- I '.1 ::i:t:: I). 00 I F ( )> 1 .,1 . I , .. t::J :·· ......... !. (./) ! --1 1:.; ~ ·, .. · n ... i --1 l,,i (./) 1·! !"; 1:11 1) i' ;•I ::: to I N I;, ::: .. 7 32'2~ 1• 7 ~(.24 I 7 ~ :1~~ i73~.;'i() i "lj2C7 I 7 ,',';; h :'1 ~::2q 1 '!· :>. ~ .. \j :-.n.~:!.1 I 7 .:,;:!-;. · n~33 ••7 3'.'34 '7!:>~'·5 ;1 ?~ ~·f, :. 7 '!. ·' ~ 7 ~7:'.~~fl ~' 7 323Y l 7 3;;4:1 J:!~'tl 1 ~£ '12 i n~4~ ''7 3:.:'44 l732't5 '7:-,;lf(: .. 7 .~~'4,. 1 ~-~ lf (- 7 ~:'6Q .1~<-~( .. 7,!.;:51 7 .. ' ;: !':? 1 !•?'.:.~ 7: ~-~ 4 I 7.!r?~~' L· 7;: t'~:h ·.'1 ~-=~1 : J:,?! 1· 7 :. ~ '.; '7 3 •.:i, . 7 :, l ! . 7:. f.2 7 .• . ''- J ~ L ~ ( r 1 n s. T t~ lif' i a:!'( •'-I !f ,; C1 t;r\1'! 'Sl•f·llllH:~ f)J!;T~lCT!·: lH Of<f'JH r U~1TY '\, f ,,, (!h :..1·.11. ((II": :.r:y ;.ce1~s11r-11. 1.11. r.o,,r-nt ~·;en-. ~.n:. ;, c T J l fl: I r; ~ fl-IJ ~:I fl. T ~ • n.,c:: • ~~VANC~ CCl~TkuLTOk~• INC. A J 1· CA l.! F ~ ~n.• I A t LL -:-, T I 1 l \I ( ti I C l E S t 11" C • Ir. t. Pl C '· 'l ~ L Jf. l\il l fl C H' 0 Ll UC 1 :.: AMlrtJC:.t· ffft-'NJCAL SLIF'Pll Id\! l.iff 1 ~· I· L' T lit~/, Tl 0 I\ /.~?lif.H~ ~~!.LI\ COf·JtTnUCTIGf! : "" . t1 c.· v l' c ;--rt r, v f.ull/. FH I\' Ct:f·.P. fq', ~ f•! ~ I :·: [)t: s 1 H I r ~ Hi r • 1. ;.· ~ o ~· -r. r ~ r o , 1 l·J c • t~~·~c11alf.~ ror;nrn PH11'., 1M· f.S~-oc. lf GI f ICll.L At:l.LYT JUL f'C Ir-.Dlr~lr<lt·L !;UfH'tt 11\'C. F· I< I< C 0 t< P n fl t l 1 Cli.; E: ,, ; ·" or :. 1: L !·: 1 c :~ N 1 t !: t. fttl'-f1~ti Ji,~Tf.U'~fl\oT~ r-a::o:v ~-.. u,, ~(;.it.vu, rnr. hEvCO l~OU51hl~L V[HJLLE~ ~ H l t. L • 1 r. C • Hl! ~ T 0 L r ,.. RI' ~ t (I I c Al. G p r • ' 11~ r. [RL0~S I~Sl~L~£~T~ ~-I L L I Af-, It • I U T L l fi r & r ~rro~r1110NJNt co. lPT CALIFG:.r.u, If~C. C ;{ C f R f s ~. • I ~ c • r~ C!H'F ,.~;'! C.~.P.C.1\./ l·llL !%C?htt.L' f.·\L-at .. ~~ fl.~ 1-r~EAHCt-t. liH. C;.l)FOH,J:' ,•.Ul(: COLLl~IOI·'• H;C 0:-"Ft~Jl'C'E u~r CLOT!! CG. c :. ," L·f~C' ~ .... ~,! uf-t. c r l•r-:. Ir.• r. Jt•tt. CttliCLlfl !:.,,;.}N(il:~ Jl:t-1h f.!'C:llLL.< f.!,1.:J~.lf!-~ c r..rn fl .> v s l r :· ~. rHr· 1:-:. cr·~vrL Ln:r f11f.VPlli. iJ.!_./.., Jr:C. r.1.l.=-•• (li. , Ir·r. f(1!1-llllff· ~.liVJ".f ff~T. C :1 l. toi .~ ·1 C:l". c: ;~L I,·.;. Tf 1: f l I C TF' JC:. L '·I ~ l • C (• 1. 1 ~ (' L ff: c r. ,, r £ f I ,\ t. 1 1; y .. [ R v I c r ~ Cl : 1 :1• s l'l• HI ., ?I/ I 6 / :' 5 llM C•IJr<. T i ~· (, ! : • :• 1 ~ l : '• • ·1 r :$!': 7. ··•·• 1 !:> ~: • 2 CJ i: • '• ! ilP& • .it it.49~.1~ tb<J.3~. ':i2 p. !lf: 13 :~. 11~ $~ tf.UJ.;1(1 $J,:.>3f..7E 12~tl96.~1 ~·2'f 7. P.£: .£C:, 1. ~5 ~<;134. 7 t• s.n.:1 .n4 l J 5 2. ,; ll lltlt 1f9t!. ~~ !~34 • .3!; ~~24.be. tl,7d6.f.( 1td~. '~ 7 Sl35.4tt , .. ~::, •. , il Hhts.!j3 ,,292."~ 1 ~~ 1 1. ·'Ii 1. [.1 .1. 1' ·:. 1 h 7 • (, (, $ l t 1:J7. d'J :f j52 •. !(i ~-51 • .B s;-,21~1.11 12,622.n 'f,2fiA.r,? i 2, ;13 u. r. q 1 12''1 ' '• t 4 • t ti !b~. 724. 1:· iu~. u- 1f. ,.<!3Eut. 7 M 7. t.7 If 3 r,. _ ll $ 1 , '.) lt 1: • ·~ I; J. 2: •. ; •• • 4 1.r..t:. Ir 12 I I~ -) • !' 2 ( r1 [ ~. r ii I t · 1 l n r-.; TRUCK PARTS BEARINGS LAB SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR P2-2S-2· AIR FARE VEHICLE LEASING LAB CHEMICALS OFFICE SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT TREE REMOVAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CHEMICAL. COAGULENTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONCRETE -·SEMINAR REGISTRATION HARDWARE SLUDGE DISPOSAL TRAVEL EXPENSES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SAND & GRAVEL ELECTRIC CART RARTS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMS ELECTRICAL .SUPPLIES PETTY CASH PUMP REPAIRS WORD PROCESSOR TRAINING LAB SUPPLIES VALVES SEMINAR REGISTRATION LAB SUPPLIES TRUCK REPAIRS HARDWARE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ENGINEERING P2-2S-2 ENGINEERING Pl-22,J-6-2 TELEPHONE SYSTEM EMPLOYEE MILEAGE GASOLINE COMPRESSOR PUB I. I CATION CALC JUM CllLOR Ill!: ELECTIHCAL SUPPi. ms ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS . ( 1!111 ..... .;·) :·i j.'. 1:1 )• . ' . , .. ,, I, ... .. , , .. I.I ii I .; .. II II ·,. l :t .. "' ,II :'.! ,. '.! ·i ·1 • •' " i ::: to I ( ( w t · I'. I: ,, c '· ) I r' • • J T 1 r l ~ 1 \.1 r I· .. l t. • . r f , • I 1 I' I ::: [' C:'l:t.TY f1.!\;Il!1JOt~ fllS.Tf11CTS Of Of\Md.:t fl 1. H'~ Ph lfl 1D/ 16/t(~ 11· ~·tr• p t r 1 r, \'. v 1 ~. 1 i. r. f.~ Oll'\I'!' " I ·" ,. ):> G> rn I'. :z i'"I t:J "i ):> -(; -I :.Jill rn rl· 3 .'ii ==l:t: :1. 00 I) I·: ... c ):> I· I h I ! ) t:::j I -!'' (/.) [.--I I. :::0 I" '··1-i,n ... , -I . (/.) '·' n 1::: 1'·'l . ·1 '·• :::: to I \.N ::: :· 7 ! ~ lL' r·1~n 1 '73:'112 t.7:3!13 .. 7 1· ~'.] 4 J73"!15 i•7 3316 :;J:-.:.H7 t 7:' 311• ._ 7:::.31 CJ . 7 ~· 3.:·1; 0:17 ~ 3H l'7 .3322 f: 7 3 "!.;l':a, n ~~:'4 (7~~2~ l·P~'lb (· 7 .... ~~ 7 il7 ~·:!-::~ C7~329 i17 ~ !3u t'733n r? ~.332 :. 73:1 .. ~~ i:7 .\~·.~it (j73~~~i f.7 .3~:!~ n3.!i:n ~ 7 :~:a 3fl f7 ~ 339 f733H! ·7~:~41 l~7:~:H2 "7~.~43 ,-7 _q1,4 ;, 7 '\ ~" ~· ,. 7 ·~ ?14f. 'B'"!.47 :". 1 :•. ~4l• .-n!4~ ;• 7 ~ .. "~~ .. 7 .~ ~: 1 r 7 !. ·''=; •. 7.'.~,!:.3 l'.1 :: ! ~4 .J7 .~ ?<~ ~ L:. ,, 11:drt:r.~ ~UHL'l ce L.t'.k.~·•t Jr:r. Lf.li·,~u. co1.1;~ l.Af; u:t. i f;L Cul\SULTIM:. tu.1-:. L J tr r o ~. ~ M :. n ~ r;, \I 1 cf ~; t· F , L ' L r ;. 11 T J r. (. Li 1 •: 1 R 11: u T 0 ~ s ' I to c • LO~ ~NG[L[~ Tl~ES L 0 1,, ·~ Y t r: "-:-~ 11 C J ft Tl S ~1 I! (~ S Y S T [ I·• ~- MA h VA C CL£Clh0!.IC.~ rESA r~~SCLIV~lLV ~LTlR t\!ALCCJ ClfHilf.aL l'(I. NATIO~~L Ch[H~fAPCH N 4 r l 0 ~"~ L L u I' [l [ k s u F-F l y NCWtRK fl.fCT~ONICS C.ITY Of N(IJ[!QRT dEACtl ~CCIVE~TAL CHEMICAL co~~. Htl (lt-f"11:r.1 CJl\F OLH'FJC Clt[UCJtL CO. OPCO oco~ tLOSf~ S[PVltf 0 ll 't (,ft-. H !\ \i J Cf CVUNTY Of L~ANL[ CO~NTY SA~lTAlTO~ GISlklCT O~h~tl COU~TY ~ATfR Dl~TRJCT rn~ IHfUSTRlfSt l~C. t r.r.JrJC :\Cl JL( Off I ff~ r A ::: I F I c ~ /;. F l 1 y t p lJ l i:: r-' r NT c (; • P 11 C l f I C ll LL L PAL~fR ~LDC. SYSTr~ CO~F. PA~AGO~ bU~I~E~S S'f~TfMS f[ ;:r, 11 C: :. T I O" S Y !:. H f1 S , H. C • Ml Kf f'fl l CH ?. !:O~-~ f'HOGF.CSSTVE ~HrL Sllf'r·LY PE CY-~LElN co~~. Tl'f f'll:tTSHP ~f,~G~l [LfCT~nr1t P~LPUCI~ r. Jr 1Jt! cnr: r- t< 0 t · B 1 ~J ~ t ~· f Y [ 11 S ~ y "· :! -1: ( pc: 0 SA!;Ol iOUJf "'[NJ Cf.. ~f.,':f~ H;/, f L[CJ::JC: Vill'•I\~· ~ '1 1, ;.· J. 0 f I< ~ 111 Tl \' <: f!, I T " I I I· r s H: H y ' J ·; r s i' l: Th r n ~. ~ 1 r·r r 1 c r r r l' r r r· r ~ l SCL-ThE.t-11 C:Hlf. [f:T~l'i' CO. !°• iJ I C ,, l. • C I' r' C f I o 1.l,b3la'I~. , H5.t.!' 1l'i4.15 13' -~:lq.: l: $ 6 • 6 1 ti • i: ·:· :t27ti.:?L ss,~n9.~H $f:t'153.:::11 $lt3q.5.H9 s21.~i:1 · ·H,. :.;.i 1.f-.S 7. HG $95.41.l 1:55fu ~ \) $.33.f!1 $3&. :10 19. 1•'.i '. 1 r, 1213.H :S.27,!>93.6! 150.(10 ·$sq.·;o ·---ll t 47 3. 24 SJ, 1'J .s. i c• $'t 11. 1 ~ 13·17.1.3 $!>t•l7!:>.2fi H1!:>l e lo $791.67 ll t't~U.42 $1,71~).~lll !13,92'1aB4 t 7 5 , 4 ~1 'i • I !:i ~6'3.14 1!!!!.75 ~1,.H2.1~1! ~4h'l.7'i t ,51} .3. 76 'f.:J't 6. :!-4 H?. .I.!; 7 i l ,J '1. 1 4 ~.t,i:,].b7 ·111/ ~. r.(.. fJ't .b7 t 1 '?. ll j •• 1 t ~>.S2, 11c> ~. :-·~ i'i7t't.'?7.2b ... r ,, U: • ~ ~; 1 , .. 1 u !l T f. ~ / . i / =· '· 1 "·r: ktl \1l•T ';l,!'-'.:tlR r.111·~ flll;l•J 1 y r..1 ( $ P. T P T \ M! UNIFORM RENTAL TRUCK PARTS FILM PROCESSING ENGINEERING P2-SR-2 SAFETY SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT DESIGN 2-10-lA ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE CllEMICALS PAINT SUPPLIES HARDWARE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WATER UScAGE CAUSTIC SODA E~ECTRICAL SUPPLIES .CHLORINE REPAIR DOOR CLOSERS OXYGEN ·-r.teDICAL EXAMS REIMBURSE WORKERS COMPENSATION WATER PRODUCTION PA I NT SUPP J. TES FIELD TRAILER SAFETY SUPPLIES TEI.EPHONE METAL BUILDING COMPUTER SERVICES HYDROGEN PEROXIDE. CONTRACTOR 3-28R STEEL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LEGAL ADVERTISING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES COPIER LEASE TRUCK PARTS VAl.VES ELECTRIC MOTOR ELECTRIC MOTOR TOOLS ·, PIPE SUPPLIES OFFICE PURNITURE POWER USEAGE NATURAL GAS ( .... ' '1 !' i·. 1~1 ) I J·' ... II I:: ,,.. !"' '11 !'• i: ... (" i 1· .. II '·' !lt :i 1·: j •• 1 ,.1 I " ~ ,.·. · .. ·' .. ... ... !" •, I, , ., 1°11 1 II (i 1· i. I .(: ::: to J:.¥,ur-:c· ~c ::: \,t11p~~;T r:n. 1··1 ?i '>!•!> • •1:!:~~,·1 f.7 ~ :'>~~ 1'7 ~3~«; { n :r.H {73~f1 ; 7 "! !t·;> ):> 17?>~tl3 CJ) ~. 7 ~ :H-4 ~ ~7~365 t::::1 •·7~!.f.f: ):> : 7 ~ ~·f7 .......... ( 7:! "ltJI --1 cn:-e:c:i rr1 r.1"!-n11 :;s: !':13 ~ 71 :::i:t:: l• 1:: "!; 7';:. 00 :·, 7 :~ ~ 13 ; 7; ~'.7q r7 :' ~75 :I> r. n~ H n I r.73!·77 I ,·.7~:'Hf1 t::::1 .......... (/) --1 ::::0 .......... n --1 (/) ::: t:O I J::' :::: ,.7~379 ·. 7 ~ 3~ii1 ,, 7 331-\l f,7:~:'>F;.> i• 7 3:",f1:~ c. 1 'I c .• J T I J .. , 1 '•' r. j. ... I ~) I c /. r-I T I. I I I•' li r [ s s I ,., (: IJ A 1 f ~ I l I t '=' , . I. 1; r ,,~·, ui\ r r;u .... t.·~1< AF-'•3 r ~ · IJ /! n ~ I. Id T /. 1 JO!~ r T s T l<I c 1 :; u I-{' !H Id. f f{; u "'Ty V r ~·i Of. ~(,IJTH!"H, fl•IH-.:TP.S OIL CO. Sllf'.~1-:/nf: COiST•iUClJC:J cor1 • Tiil. ~lH l'L Ii t·S T f\i. ~1 Y fi' I G tr: f E k f ~ (, TI· 'r L OJ> • i' IJ 'Jr: Tt-11..fi~M YM f.OIH T H F C ll l C I'' ..; 1 tH. C 11 0 r. C. l' • , lf, C Tt1f;i'lfS(lf.J Ll:COlli.R CC\. Tllf.f\.S.H .. lkJC~ [1(LAVJ\tt me. Tl./,\Vf.'L '11\~Vfl TiWO' E. 1\1110 ~l.IPFLY, H~C. Tft-.JCK t.vn;u.uur fr;uir~t:n ru A1\K ULT I !'-'r. L'~! I Hf' F Al<CfL <)f PVI Ct. V • •1 • C • 1 f S T J t.1 G \11.ii' ~.c H IH Ir Ir V . .:-LL [V C J J ll S S ll P f· L Y C 0 • Vt.;JJi:U r.fil\J HC'~ VIKJlG flWf FR0Tf\TJO~ VOTO H£CtHl\ir. \J A l., K l S ~:I• E fli(; I N t. S fR V l C fl\· TH vr~TrP~ ELECTfiG~lC CORP. ~f~T[R~ ~)Qf ~ ALLOY ~:HJlft FH:f & VlRVlllf )>'. r,, r.x rr.1n-. ) i" f, I< 'V f /. S ~. ll C t T f S , l N r • 7IF' TU'l'Ofi:.HY I [Rsor.r~rL H 1 01 ,, R r r • 1• u c. i< C l.J J I" f, I· /I JD ·J :H , (, I U '- ll'~ CiUNT \~~, •. !.;. :t '+ '.'SIJ 2 •.. l S.~131.~:1 i31U'l5ebl; f2J·J.72 '23 b. •HJ n 'J ~,~·ti 1 • il G \2. 78 ,j. ·,~ ·; 2 7 11. ff: 12::,u.;:~1 $11126.1~. 1Hl9.7~ 160171.lef:.l 1-l~lf.Pl ! 1 • :Ill l. 2 t1 $21~:21.~5 $ 1 • 'i :) 1 • j t-. ~518.67 s 24 8. ij () $'171.r.o S.HB't • 't.3 Uo'.l• 76 u t26!l.ll5 $65:). ~· c u.12.~o:' UtYu1.83 tl,917.lli 185.H: TGJt.L CLI Tl''S P/. If 3/l,f /H~ 1-l t 't .; l ' ':· 7 1 • l 3 ::=============== nrsn 1•T1 cu KEROSENE CONTRACTOR 2-24 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BEARINGS BEARINGS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR I-2R 2A PA INT SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AIR FARE TRUCK PARTS TRUCK REPA(RS CONTRACTOR PW 119, PW 129 DELIVERY SERVICE LAB SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES LAB SUPPL JES PRINTING SPRINKLER INSPECTION BEARING TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WELDING SUPPLIES DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY COPIER LEASE VALVES TEMPORARY HELP DIRECTORS COMP. & MILEAGE ( ( ( .j " ·1 ·1 .. 1 :1 j :·~i j !··1 ,lil 11 ::! ~ Ii . I l'., '.:·:·I: I· .. ;..11 I,.:: .'.'I ··! .; .. "' ~ ::: to { ( I . "°' '~~FUN~ HO I J -·- . ':: 1.: 9l~~ -Jl D!~T WOR~!~~.£APITAb ____ ----------COUNT'L.~M~ LTAT LQ~ !> tHB ! tILQf Pf\l\tHi~ CQUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/06/85 --, • SUMMARY 1.1 I J--gfip£R FUND $ 993. 86 -, .. 1 #2 F/R FUND 11,533.28 '.11 ; ___ #3 QP~R FUNQ ______ ··-·-·. -----·-··-··· _____ . . 170.()9 __ 1:u, )> #3 ACO FUND 260,841 .9la • •41 CJ> #5 OPER FUND 496. 95 ~HL.A~O FUN.D .... 9 .• 67 ____ -·-·---·-· __ _ t::1 #6 OPER FUND la0.86 AMOUNT ·------------... ------------·. -·---·-·-··-·-· )> #7 OPER FUND 6,072.25 -1'-'""4 HU .. Q.P~ !LfU~D ·---· ····· --··· ·-··------· -_______ J. ~ ~ ~ ! ?3 •~ # 5 & 6 0 P E fl. FU N 0 I , la 9 2 • 8 5 ")!zu ~ #5&6 ACO FUND 18, 955. 82 1' #6&7 OP.!JL£UNO 4.~ll.!Q~ _______________ .. _ .. :;t:JT OPER FUND 429,5.76.05 CORF 606,2.66.30 2 ' _ _?.°g~Lfl,J~P~D !{OR~~ll~M ~ . .! NSURANCE FUND ___ ··-----··-·-·---··· _________ J • 793 ~ l Q I JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 55,693.80 :Jiu ll )> PROCESSING DATE 3/01/85 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 I r ------------------------······-----------·-·--· 11 r- .)11' TOTAL CLAIMS PA ID 03/06/85 llJ t::1 Jl·-·~- ··1 (/) -' ll --1 $1,401,571.13 JJ f--...c;..;3C--------------------------------------------------·-··--·------··----·---------· l•I _. _,)Jul Cl l• --1 (/') JI _) .... .rJ L_~~~~~~~~ 4b ._; 1·· • 41 ··~ ·Jiu ·~ I'" ._,/ju ::I ,./1"" :::r --------·--·-----· ·------------· ·------------------------ ... · r·ll' ......5 ~· \,,,,,,,IJ I "i U1 -- 11'''! :::: ··--·------·-· 'L~ ---·--· _..__ -- ------- { ;:1 1·! :u! I •·i uj 1 ·1i _.';! '. !::1 aj -"! 1,1• ,·, ',• l I ·,.i ('.; ,;:; t'i I"', ltl, :"' !:.:I I.,, , ... 1"'1 .. ,, . ·' 11 i.:1 ~ --. .. .. " := • 0 . ::, :: >: : 2 i -: iJ 3 ~ ~ =: ~ -: s ~-. : ' ·---.--•, ; ..I -# -- G~,:...;;7 >~O • __ ·_:.,_··---------- c. Q. CCNT~P..~7CR :. FR.lSK UL7I>!O. GP;ERl.L BUILDI~~G C'AT=: ~.f;.:!·~!i l!. E:.: CO~TRACTOR JOB: P..l.'."r\G .l..~\D 0!-{ . .\I~;AG'.: AT TR.E.l.r.·fE~T PL.~ST !\O. ~ -Jol:J ~:o. P\·,· -119 .s Amount of this Change Order (ADD) ~--------------- Jn accordance with contract provisions, the foll~Ning chanses in the ccntr~ct ar.d/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Ite:-:1 1 ADDITIONAL WORK TO Ail!:A AD.JACENT TO THE S~iT:\ .l..~A RIVER, FCC No. 1 The Contractor \\as directed to remove shrubs and other deb:-is, and to fill low reiions in the area between the Districts' souther~ property line a~d the Santa Ana River Trail. This action was taken to __ eliminate .the standing water problem in this area. The stagnant water produced odors and mosquito control problems. Contractor is allowed cost for re~oval of debris and filling the area on force account basis, in accornance \t;i t:i Section 10-4 of the General Provisions, in the a:nount of $9,213.06. ADDED COSTS THIS CHA~GE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,213.06 TBIE EXTENSION THIS CliA.~GE ORDER ITE\f: 0 Caledar Days Item 2 REPLACE ~m REPAIR ITEMS ON IRRIGATION LI~ES J FCO No. 2 The Contractor replaced a broken 6-inch valve and instailed a pipe saddle on an existing irrigation line, all not part of the contract work. The Contractor also replaced an existing 1-inch water line that required relocation. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ . 1,886.28 TIME EXTENS rmr THIS CHk~GE ORDER ITE-f: 0 Calendar Da}:S Item 3 INSTALLATION OF 2-INCH CONDUIT, FCO ~o. 3 The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a 2-inch electrical cor.cuit from the existing warehouse to the new planter area, anticipating the installation of future lighting. ADDED COSTS THIS CHA~:GE ORDER ITE~·f: $ 1,245.71 TDlE EXTEXSION THIS CHA~GE ORDER !TE~: 0 C.1lenJ~r D~ys "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(A)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" ? • C. 2 0 ;{ 8 i 2 7 -l () 3 4 ~ E ~!...I 5 .A.';::.'.·;::: FGUNT AI~·~ VA !...!...=:'f, c;..L I FCR~·i !...l. S 2 7 .: ~ CH.ANGE ORDER GR;. .• 'l 7 c. c. NO.~ ___ ;-_::_; ________ ~------- CCNIR.ACTOR: 1 j 1 ~ .. :: : ' ~ .. ... .... FRA:;K UL TI~·iO, GE::ERAL BUILDI~G CO~T~ . .lJ2_TOR DA IE ~~------~------~------- JOB: P . .l..VP:G A;-..n DRAI~AGE AT TRE.\"r.-1E~T PLA~T ~o. 2, Job ~o. p~·.·-119 __________________________________________ ___;:.__ ________________________________ __ Item 4 SURVEYI~G CHARGES FOR GR~DE AXD ROAD DESIG~ CIH~GES, FCQ No. ~ Contractor orovided additional surveying needed to change grade and road elevations ~equested by s~aff. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,160.00 TD1E EXTE~SION THIS CHAXGE ORDER ITE.\I: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 ADDITIO~AL PIPI:\G ACROSS ROAD "A", FCO No. S The Contractor was directed to excavate across road "A" and place SO-feet of 10-inch schedule 80 PVC piping. -'This additional piping was necessary for the west side of road "A" to drain properly. ADDED COSTS THIS CHA~GE ORDER ITb\f: $ 1,770.96 TIME EXTENSION THIS C~~GE ORDER ITE-1: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 REPAIR 2-INCH IRRIGATION LI~E, FCO ~o. 6 The Contractor was directed to repair a 2-inch PVC irrigation line which was da~aged by others after initial placement by the Contractor. Contractor is allowed costs for re~air. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM : $ 287.69 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM : 0 Calendar Days Item 7 REPLACE FENCI~G ALONG TALBERT C:IANNEL, FCO No. 7 The Contractor was directed to replace. 45 -feet of 6 -foot PVC green coated chain link fencing and straighten two posts at the southwest corner of Plant No. 2 property line. The fencing had been daraaged by vandals. ADDED COSTS THIS CHA~GE ORDER ITEM: $ 435.00 TDIE EXTE~;sro~ THIS CH.-\~GE ORDER ITEM: 0 Cal~nd~r Da::.:; TOTAL A[{)E!J COSTS T'riIS C!-I.~~;GE ORDER: 16.?93 .... 0 ----·---- "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(A)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" -."'''~ ...... ~ T ,. t...,, ~.·. 1 ....... . ..... :: : ..... '!'\ " ,. ----:" ......... \ ....... . ....,, . . ........ \ ' . ·-......... . '·. ' ... ,. I• .. : • .. C.G. 1 • •• ;\~ I -.1 ·-·. ~~~.~~~~~~~ CC~·;T-R.-\CTGR' P "T ·:~ --·rno G.,..,·r::r.i'L nUILDI'·r ...... ""'\ ... , .... --• -· • ' C..•C:. ...... -\ . D .'t.J The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. Sill·N.\RY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Oriiinal Contract Time Original Completion Date Total Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Ti~e Revised Completion Date December lOJ 1984 120 Calendar Days April 8, 1935 0 Calendar Days 7 Calendar Days 127 Calendar Days April 15, 1985 Original Contract Price Prev. Au th. Changes This Change (ADD) ~ Amended Contract Price Beard a 11 thori .... ~atinn dc:-t~-·. \ i·1 10 10s~ ~ --: pr , ~ ..., ApprovE:::d: $ lJ.~. 771. 80 $ 5 405. 24 $ 16,998.70 $ 1~5.1-:-:.-J COUNTY S.~'llTATIC~l DISTRICTS c~ Orange Cc~~~J, Californ!~ /}·" (\ . \.,,.) -_/L,;,:"·-t::"-. ~'; !\L _, 5l 2 l£..L '. ~ ,. ' -,::-:) .' . ! . I - " .~·') ··-·~'· __ c-=J_.;· .'"""'··L~,,.,......---.. __ ...;,.;;:;_,,......,~~ -,,C-3;, . · AG~NDA--lTEM #9 (A) ( 1) -A LL DI STR I CTS "C-3 II CGtJ:·J7.( s;..;JITA.TIO~·! C!57~ICT3 GF c~ . .!:··i·~= CQt.;~-J-4 ( ?. 0. BOX 3127 -10344 ELLIS ;.·;=>~UE FOUNTAIN VALL=Y, CALIFCRNIA 92708 CHtl.NGE ORD=~ C • 0 • N 0 . Three ( 3) CONTRACIOR: p~;NK ULTT'.f0 1 GF\FDAL BUU.QIXG DAT=: ~·iarch 25, 1985 CONTRACTOR JOB: PAVING AND DRAI~JAGE :\T TREA.TI-IE~T PLANT NO. 2-PW-119 Amouct of this Change Order (ADD) ( A.c..r II -) $~~1~4 __ 4_0,9~·~1~0~--~~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the ccntrac: and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the follcwi~g additions to or deductions frcm the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEERS QUAJ-ITITIES ADD: Item Change Estimated Qty. No. Unit Description FROM TO Difference 2. SQ.FT. A.C. Paving 60,000 67,338 7,338 @ 1.12/S.F. 9. SQ.FT. A.C. Paving 7,000 10,191 3,191 @ 1. 94/S .F. TOTAL ADD The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the · original contract. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Total Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Contract Date December 10, 1984 120 Calendar Days April 8, 1985 0 Calendar Days 7 Calendar Days 127 Calendar Days April 15, 1985 = $"8,218.56 = $ 6,190.54 = $14,409.10 Or1ginal Contract Price S __ ~1~4~2~·~7~7~1~·~8~0---------~ Prev. Auth. Changes $ ____ 2_2_,_4_0_3_._9_4 ______ ~ This Change (ADO) (pc-.. z-) $ 14,409.10 --------------------------~ Amended Contract Price 179,584.94 Board authorization date: April 10; 1985 Apprcved: COUNTY SAN IT AT l ON or: 3/::5/85 Contractor "D" AGENDA ITEM #9(A)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "D" "E" RESOLUTION NO. 85-61 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-119 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,· 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PAVING AND DRAINAGE AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-119, "AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO.HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Paving and Drainage at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, on March 21, 1985; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the ~ contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Paving and Drainage at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated December 10, 1984; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section s. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Paving and Drainage at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11 and 13, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 10, 1985. AGENDA ITEM f.9(A)(3) -ALL DISTRICTS "E" COUNTY SANITATION JISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ?. 0. BOX 3127 -10844 ELLIS AV~~UE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER G~ANT NO. ~U~\ ~~--~~~~~~~~~~ C.O. NO. One (1) CONTR:· ... croR = FRANK ULTIMO t GE~ER;\L BUILDING DATE March 6' 1985 CONTRACTOR JOB: WASTE GAS BURNERS AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-121 Amount of this Change Order {ADD) (~!DHKI) $ 9,690 .00 Jn accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. The Contractor is directed to delay the installation of the new waste gas burners and to re- install the old gas burners. The delay is necessary in order to provide the Districts time for compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) requirements re: Rule 431.1,, limits on sulfur emissions from engine digester gas exhaust. The Contractor is allowed a 270 calendar day time extension since AQMD approval has not yet been received,, and an instal~­ ation schedule cannot yet be determined. When AQMD has given its approval, the Districts "ill notify the Contractor to disassemble the old gas burners, and to resume the installation of th~ new waste gas burners. The additional amount for reinstallation of the old burners, redismant- eling the old burners, installation of the new burners, furnishing and installing additional parts and fittings, bonding charges, and move in and move out charges at an und~termined date has been negotiated for the lump sum amount of $9,690.00 TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $9,690.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 270 Calendar Days 1e additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime wo:<: '-rhd within the time allotted for the original contract plus the 270 days time extension grant- ed hereby. It is therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension other than 270 days approv- ed herein is required for this change order,, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequen- tial costs or expenses hav~ been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date June 27, 1984 90 Calendar Days September 24,, 1984 270 Calendar Days 270 Calendar Days 360 Calendar Days June 21, 1985 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) (EIUll'.!~I) Amended Contract Price $ 54,900.00 s 0.00 $ 9,690.00 s 64,590.00 B?ard Author i :at ion Date:· April 10, 1985 Approved: ~ B~ ~.'\ltt:;: !(111.SS "F" cAGfi-NDA1 d TEM #9 (B) COU:\TY 5.l.::r:.nro~: DISTRICTS OF Orange Coun!y, California B~.17£~~ .:/:; ·o~ ALL DISTRICTS >:·:•:!::: ~: _._~: :..~:'!Fl',. P::tge 1 of .., COUNTY SANITATION DISTKICTS OF ORt..NGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 -10344 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92703 CH.A.NGE OR DER GRANT NO. N/A ~ ~~~------~~---~~~· C • O • NO • One ( 1) CONTRACTOR:. THIBODO CONSTRUCTION COMPA\1Y DATE March 14, 1985 JOB: SUPPLEMENTAL REPAIR OF BUSHARD TRUNK -PHASE II. JOB NO. I-2R-2A $ 10,874.30 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) { 9[91leT) ------------------------------ Jn accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are he.reby authorized and as compensation therefor, the fol lowing additions to or deductions from the contract.price are hereby approved. Item 1 PRECAST DECKING AND SUPPORT SECTIONS The Contractor was allowed to precast sections of concrete that were specified on the contract drawings to be poured in place over the 54~ inch sewer line. A cost reduction was negotiated in the amount of ' $5, 000. 00 fcfr the subject work. The construction of precast structures required additional time but reduced disruption to the public at the site. The Contractor is allowed a 43 calendar day time extension for the construction of the precast sections. ·AMOUNT OF CREDIT nIIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item 2 USE OF DISTRICTS' PROPERTY FOR CONTRACT WORK $ (S,000.00) 43 Calendar Days 1be Contractor was allowed to construct the precast section, (see Item 1), on District land at Plant No. 2. A cost reduction was negotiated in the amount of $1,000.00 for the use of Districts property. AMOUNT OF CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (1,000.00) TIME EXTENSION IBIS CHANGE ORDEP. ITEM: O Calendar Days Item 3 PIPE TRENCH SUBGRADE CHANGES The pipe bedding did not contain the rock/gravel backfill indicated on the "as built" plans, but instead unstable soil was found. The Contractor was directed to excavate 2-fcet deeper than shown on the contract drawings and replace with 3/4-inch rock. Additional asphaltic concrete paving was required due to the excavation. The extra work required additional rock, asphaltic concrete, paving, labor, and equipment. Extra ·costs for this work in accordance with Section 10-4 of the General Provisions, total $16,874.30. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: n:.m EXTP:srn:~ THIS CHANGE ORDER ITE~·I: $ 16,8~4.30 0 Calendar Dc-;.ys "G-]:" AGENDA ITEM #9(c)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS. "G-1" COU~TY SA~IT~TIO~ DISTRICTS OF OR~XG~ COU~TY P.O. BOX 8127 -108~~ ELLIS AVE~UE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFOR~IA 92708 CHA~GE ORDER GRA~T NO. NIA C • 0 • X 0 • One r 1 ) ~~___.;;::.:..:..;:::--;....::..:..~~~~ CO~ITRACTOR4 THIBODO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY DATE March 14, 1985 JOB: SUPPLE~ENTAL REPAIR OF BUSHARD TRUNK, PHASE II, JOB ~O. I-2R-2A TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 10,874.30 TOTAL TIME EXTE~SION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 43 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this change order can be perfol'l1led incidental to the prime work_ and within the time allotted f9r.the original contract. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs of expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension This Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: April 10, 1985 ~--.~~----.------____ ,. ___ _ ~ December 10, 1984 SO Calendar Days January 28, 1985 ·43 Calendar Days 43 Calendar Days 93 Calendar Days March 12, 1985 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) {€£ M' Amended Contract Price Approved: AGEN~At1aFf!Mr#9(c)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS $ 220,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 10 874.30 $ 230,874.30 "G-2" "H" RESOLUTION NO. 85-62 ACCEPTING JOB NO. I-2R-2A AS COMPLETE -A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,· 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPAIR OF BUSHARD TRUNK, PHASE II, JOB NO. I-2"R-2A, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Thibodo Construction Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, on March 12, 1985; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the \.,,,) contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract ther~for, dated December 10, 1984; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Thibodo Construction Company, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11 and 13, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 10, 1985. AGENDA ITEM #9(c)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "H" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 1 of 7 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-150 C. 0. NO .-...... E-i g_h_t _(_8_) --- DATE ---M-a--rc....,..h---.,;,-7 ,----1-ga""""'s--CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. JOB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 C HEADWORKS, Job No.· P2-25-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Qe~~ct) $ 28,778.52 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 NEW ENGINE BACKFIRE PIPING MODIFICATIONS, FCO 1 Contractor was directed to remove flex couplings on 4-inch backfire piping near new engines 1 and 3, and install blind flanges as required. The existing back- fire system which was vented to the roof produced too much back flow pressure impeding proper engine operation. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 200.00 . TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 FLAME ARRESTORS REMOVED FROM DIGESTER GAS PIPING, FCO 2 Contractor was directed to remove two flame arrestors from engines 1 and 3, and install blind flanges as required. This was due to an AQMD requirement for a per- mit to operate the new engines on natural gas only. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 200.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 3 REPAIR DISCHARGE PIPING ON SEWAGE PUMPS, FCO 3 (AW252-2) ·As new discharge elbows were welded ta pumps Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 42-inch lines, it was discovered that the existing lines, which are cast into the concrete discharge channel floor, were badly out of round, or "egg-shaped". To provide a smooth weld, Contractor was directed to repair the pipes, and is allowed the extra charges incurred. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,431. 05 0 Calendar Days "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(n)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Page 2 of 7 GRANT NO. C-06-1073-150 C. O. NO.--E,...-. g--ht_(_8_) --- DATE · -..,,.M,,_.a.-rc-h__,,;,7-, --.1,...,,9,...,,,8 ..... 5--CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. JOB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILtTIES AT PLANT NO. 2 C HEADWORKS, Job No. P2-25-2 Item 4 REPAIR DISCHARGE PIPING ON MAIN SEWAGE PUMPS, FCO 4 (AW252-l) Extensive corrosion was found in the 42-inch discharge line of Pump No. 4 at the discharge channel floor line. The contractor repaired the line by welding a butt- strap all around the inside of the pipe, and by sandblasting and coal tar coating as well. Anticipating similar corrosion problems with the remaining pumps' discharge lines, staff requested a spare butt-strap for future repairs. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,273.47 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: O Calendar Day Item 5 CHANGE INSTALLATION DETAILS, 48-INCH OVERFLOW LINE, FCO 5 (PCH252-1) \._) A section of the 48-inch overflow bypass line in the grit chambers was changed from reinforced concrete pipe to steel cylinder pipe. The steel section was pre- fabbed and coated with Zebron to prevent corrosion. The installation of this sec- tion of pipe was at an extremely low elevation requiring a major shut down to measure and fabricate the specified RCP. Using the prefabbed steel cylinder pipe resulted in a minor shut down to trim and install the section of the pipe. This change was necessary .due to the fact that the exact dimension of piping needed to complete the job was not shown on the contract drawings. Contractor is allowed the cost of furnishing the coated steel pipe, less cost of the specified rein- forced pipe, in the amount of $1,836.00 ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,836.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 INSTALLATION OF 111 NPT PORTS, AW252-5 Contractor was directed to install three (3) 1-inch·National Pipe Thread ports each on the exhaust pipes of Engine No. 1 and Engfne No. 3 to facilitate testing of catalytic converters. This change was required by AQMD. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1, 128.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days . "'I -2" AGENDA ITEM #9(n)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "l-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Page 3 of 7 GRANT NO. . C-06-107 3-150 C. 0. NO .---E-i g ..... h-t -('""""'8-) --- DATE _.....,M~a--rc ...... h--="'"'7 , ............ 1.,,,..,9 8,,..,5,___ CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ~OB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 C HEADWORKS, Job No. P2-25-2 Item 7 INSTALLATION OF COOLING WATER SUPPLY LINES, AW252-6 Contractor was directed to install cooling water supply lines and valves to the two (2) new Worthington pumps. These lines were not shown on contract drawings, but were necessary for proper engine operation and for Worthington to guarantee the new pumps. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 630.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 8 RELOCATION OF POLE AND LIGHT FIXTURE ~T GRIT CHAMBER STAIRS, EW252-10 The orginal contract drawings showed the electrical pole and light at the bottom of the grit chamber stairs. This location did not sufficiently light the whole stairway, and would produce a potential safety hazard. The light and pole were relocated to make the best possible use of this lighting installation. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 210.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: O Calendar Days Item 9 INSTALLATION OF INTERLOCKS ON GRIT AUGERS, AW252-3 The safety interlocks for No. 1, 2 and 3 grit auger conveyors had been removed by the Districts in preparation. for the e 1 ectr.i ca 1 contract work. The grit auger controls have been relocated but no provisions were made to reinstall the safety system. The Contractor reinstalled the safety interlocks at no additional cost. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ o.oo TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: O Calendar Days "l-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(o)(l) -ALL· DISTRICTS "1-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 4 of 7 CHANGE OR DER GRANT NO. ·c-06-1073-150 C. 0. NO .-'"='·E-; g-.-h-t -(-8.,....) --- DATE _.....,M,.....a .... rc-h~7 , ............ 1 ..... 98 ...... 5--CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. JOB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 C HEADWORKS, Job No. P2-25-2 Item 10 INSTALLATION OF NEW SEWAGE PUMP DISCHARGE PIPING, CRC252-2 The Contractor was allowed to use 42-inch O.D. pipe in lieu of the 42-3/4-inch pipe shown on the contract drawings. The dimension of the piping on the drawings would require special fabrication which was not the intent of the original design. This Contractor Requested Change resulted in no additional costs, and no addi- tional time. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ o.oo TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 11 PITCH POCKETS IN LIEU OF FLASHINGS, CRC252-3 The Contractor requested to use the submitted pitch pocket detail for equipment '\-.) and pipe supports on the Headworks C roof in lieu of the flashings in the detail shown on the contract drawings. The roofing contractor would not give the required 20-year bond to the roof if the original contract detail was to be used. This new pitch pocket detail is an improvement over the contract detail, is com- patible with the bonded roof system, and will not incur any additional costs to the Districts. ADDED COSTS" THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ o.oo TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 12 NAMEPLATE CORRECTION ON ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, FCO 7 The Contractor was directed to change the wording on the nameplates for several electrical items and to add nameplates where they had been omitted on the contract drawings. The names for some of the equipment· supplied were different from what was called out on the contract drawings. These nameplates are needed to correctly identify each individual item. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 300. 00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days II 1-4 11 AGENDA ITEM #9(n)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS II 1-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 5 of 7 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ·t-06-1073-150 C. 0. NO .-....... E..--i g"""'"h-t -( ....... 8._) --- DATE -~M~a r ...... c~h--=-7 ,----1"""""98--s=----CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. JOB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES .AT PLANT NO. 2 C HEADWORKS, Job No. P2-25-2 Item 13 HYDROGEN SULFIDE ALARM PANEL REWIRING, PCH252-21 (FCO 8) The Contractor was directed to remove the existing No. 12 wiring to the Hydrogen Sulfide Alarm Panel and to replace it with 18 ga. 2/pr. shielded cable. The alarm panel manufacturer, M.S.~., has determined that if the wiring specified in the contract drawings were to be used, there would be too much interference to get a correct ·reading. M.S.A. recommended the use of a shielded cable to eliminate the interference. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 404.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ·o Calendar Days Item 14 REMOVAL OF EXISTING FOUL AIR DUCTS IN GRIT CHAMBERS, EW252-5 The Contractor removed and disposed of interferring, old air ducts in existing Grit Chambers Nos. 1 through 6 to facilitate installation of new covers and cover supports. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ o.oo TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 15 DELAY IN ENGINE START UP, C252-1 The Contractor is allowed costs incurred because of a delay in the start up of the engines when Districts directed Contractor to stop testing procedures on November 7, 1984, in Drder to comply with AQMD directive. The work could be completed within the original contract time, so no additional time will be required. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,828.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: O Calendar Days Item 16 PRE-LUBE PUMP MODIFICATIONS, FCO 11 Contractor was directed to install motor control starters, conduit and wiring on pre-lube pumps for engines Nos. 1 and 3. These motor control starters were not shown on the contract drawings, but were necessary for proper engine operation. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1, 898. 00 . O Calendar Days "1-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(n)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "I-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Page 6 of 7 GRANT NO. ·-C-06-1073-150 C. 0. NO .-"'"!:lE~i g....,.h_t __ ( 8:!"T') ___ _ DATE -~M~a r-c~h-7=-,---=-1 g~a:-::s--CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. . JOB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 C HEADWORKS, Job No. P2-25-2 Item 17 MASTER PUMP CONTROL PANEL CHANGES, FCO 12 Contractor was directed to change the internal wiring, to add recorders, total- izers and adders to the Master Pump Control Panel. The addition of new magnetic meters (under separate contract) required panel hardware different than originally specified on the contract drawings (the new mag meters were required in order to comply with EPA requirements). ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,515.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: O Calendar Days Item 18 CATALYTIC CONVERTER CONDUIT, FCO 13 Contractor was directed to install conduit and wiring from the two catalytic con- verter temperature probes, located on engines Nos. 1 and 3 to the engine control panel. The conduit and wiring were not shown on the contract drawings, but were necessary for the probes to operate properly. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 925.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $28, 778. 52 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days II I -6" AGENDA ITEM 9(n) Cl) ALL DISTRICTS "l-6" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 7 of 7 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. ·c-06-1073-150 C. 0. NO .--=t~i g-.-h-t _,,(,.....8..-) --- DATE -~M~a r ... c..,...h__.,.,...7 ,.........,,..1..,,...98""""5...--CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. JOB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 C HEADWORKS, Job No. P2-25-2 The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, i~cidental or consequential cbsts or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Origin~l Completion Date Time Extension this c.o. Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date . September 12, 1983 600 Calendar Days May 3, 1985 0 Calendar Days 3 Calendar Days 603 Calendar Days May 6, 1985 Original Contract Price $ 3,210,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 65,086.21 This Change (Add) (Deehiet) $--2~8,_:;,,-77-..a-• .,.,..52- Amended Contract Price $ 3,303,864.73 Board authorization date: April 10, 1985 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. By 4/10/85 ·ontractor Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By a.1 f11~v 4/10/85 Deputy Chief Engineer "I-7" AGENDA ITEM #9(n)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "1-7" II jll RESOLUTION NO. 85-63 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-25-2 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, ·s, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-25-2, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Advance Constructors, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, on March 11, 1985: and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the \.._,.) contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed: and, Section 3. That Hydraulic Reliab~lity Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contrac~ therefor, dated September 12, 1983; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Advance Constructors, Inc., setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment ~!ant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel: and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11 and 13, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 10, 1985. AGENDA ITEM #9(n)(2) -~LL DISTRICTS II 111 \.i "K-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE CEUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Apri 1 1, 1985 TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services with Lee and Ro, Consulting Engineers for design and construction services for Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-2~; Rehabilitation of Primary Basins 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-24R; and, Rehabilitation of Primary Basins A, B, C, H, ·I, J, K, L and M at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Comnittee has negotiated the following fee with Lee and Ro, Consulting Engineers, for design and construction services required for the rehabilitation of primary basins at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, for an amount not to exceed a total of $325,400 as follows: Professional Design and Construction Services, at hourly rates plus Overhead at 120%, not to exceed Direct Expenses, not to exceed Soil Investigations, not to exceed Profit Total, Not to Exceed $286,200.00 2,080.00 8,500.00 28,620.00 $325' 400. 00 AGENDA ITEM #9(E)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" "K-2" Board of Directors April 1, 1985 Page Two COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE \w) FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not res~lt in excessive profits for the consultant. ls/Richard B. Edgar Richard B. Edgar Joint Chairman Selection Committee /s/Don R. Griffin Don R. Griffin Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee ls/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer Selection Committee AGENDA ITEM #9(e)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "K-2" RESOLUTION NO. 85-64 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LEE AND RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES RE JOBS NOS. Pl-23R, Pl-24R AND P2-31R A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS _OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE CX>UNTY, CALIFORNIA, .APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH LEE AND RO CX>NSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES RE JOBS NOS. Pl-23R, Pl-24R AND P2-31R * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for design of Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-23R, Rehabilitation of Primary Basins 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-24R, and Rehabilitation of Primary Basins A, B, C, H. I, J, K, L and M at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R, and for construction support services in connection therewith; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Conunittee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. _That the certain agreement dated April 10, 1985, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County and Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, for design of Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(E)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" at Plant No.-1, Job No. Pl-23R, Rehabilitation of Primary Basins 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-24R, and Rehabilitation of Primary Basins A, B, C, B. I, J, K, L and M at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R, and for construction support services in connection therewith, is hereby approved and accepted1 and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Design and Construction Support Services, at hourly rates plus overhead at 120%, not to exceed Direct Expenses, not to exceed Soil Investigation Services, not to exceed Profit $286,200.00 2,080.00 a,soo.oo 28,620.00 TOTAL, not to exceed ••••••••••••••••••• $325,400.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement, on behalf of itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11 and 13, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 10, 1985. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(E)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" "M" CCM?ANY/IOCATION 1. Allied Corporation BID TABULATION LIQUID CATIONIC POLYELECT'ROLYT.E (POLYMER) SPECIFICATION NO. P-075 BID OPENING: MARCH 26, 1985 AT 11:00 A.M. OOSAGE RATE WET LB.S. UNIT . (IBS/'IDN) REQUIRED CDST 'IDI'AL PRICE Morristown, NJ 7.8 13,565,220 $0.0552 $ 748,800.14 2. Diatec Polyners Batavia, IL 8.6 15,288,890 0.0501 765,973.38 3. Arrerican Cyanamid Co. Wayne, NJ 11.1 15,050,850 0.0555 835,322.18 4. calgon Corporation Pittsburgh, PA 8.7 15,130,440 0.085 1,286,087.40 5. San Joaquin Chemical~ No. Hollywood' CA 11.6 23,200,000 0.0775 1,798,000.00 We have reviewed the proposals su1::mitted for the above project and find the low bid is a responsible bid. We, therefore·, reccmrend award to Allied Corporation, Chemical Sector, low bidder, for the milt price of $.0552 per wet pound, for a total amount not to exceed $748,801.00, plus applicable sales tax, for a one year period, cCxmencing April 12, 1985 th.rough April 11, 1986. Provisions are in the specifications for contract extensions for four ( 4) consecutive one-year periods. · Ted E. Hoffman Chief of Procurement and Property Robert J. Ooten Operations Engineer AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DISTRICTS "M" March 19, 1985 11:00 a.rn. ~ BID TABULATION SHEET 1985 SPECIFICATION NO. S-023 PROJECT TITLE: LABORATORY CONTRACT FOR ANALYSES OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER PROJECT DESCRIPTION:· ~lyses of samples requiring specialized equiµnent. EST~: I.W. $ 9,900 LAB 33,600 TOrAL $43,500 CONTRACI'OR 1. Brown and Caldwell, Analytical Services Pasadena, CA 91105 ?.. Truesdale Laboratories Tustin; CA 92680 * Remairiing cost to be applied to 85-86 Budget_. TOrAL BID $41,890 $67,420 I have reviewed the bids and find that the Estimate is low, I, therefore, reccmnend award to Brown and Caldwell Analytical Services in the estimated bid of $41,890 as the lowest and best bid. ~~fe.~~~ Richard W. van Langen, P. E. · Chief of the Industrial Waste Division "N" AGENDA ITEM #9(G) -ALL DISTRICTS "N" LAW OFFICES OF ~ JAMES G. ROURKE THOMAS L. WOOORUFF' ALAN R. WATTS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SUITE 1020 CALIFORNIA FIRST BANK BUILDING 1055 NORTH MAIN STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 TELEPHONE (714) 835-6212 TELECOPIER: (714) 835·7787 CABLE ADDRESS: RORWOOD TELEX: 80•4294 KEN NARO R. SMART. JR OANIEL K. SPRAOLIN LYOIA S. LEVIN MARK T WILLMAN SUZANNE 0 ATKINS LOIS E JEFFREY THOMAS F. NIXON "O" To: From: Re: MEMORANDUM Honorable Chairman and Members of Boards of Directors General Counsel Date: April 1, 1985 Claim of Gunsul On March 26, 1985, the Districts received a claim on behalf of the surviving estate of a former _District employee, alleging that the District was responsible for the employee's death, in that it provided· him access to individuals who engaged in consuming alcoholic beverages. The accident occurred off of the District property, and after the regular work hours of District employees, including the decedent. Our preliminary examination indicates no legal responsibility on behalf of the District, and it is recommended that the claim be denied and the matter referred to the District's Claims Administrator ·and this office for further· processing, in the event ~:i~;~~ly filed. / Thomas ~. Woodr~ff /'/ . TLW:pj cc: Mr. J.W. Sylvester Mr. G. Streed Miss R. Brown General Counsel AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "O" "P" RESOLUTION NO. 85-70-2 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING OF PIPELINE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE' RAILWAY COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 2-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ANµ AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A PIPELINE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE FULLERTON-BREA (PURCHASE) RELIEF TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-25 * * ·• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County sanita~ion District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: . Section 1. That the certain Pipeline License Agreement dated February 15, 1985, by and between The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (Licensor) and County Sanitation District No. 2 (Licensee), wherein Licensor grants to Licensee the right to construct the Fullerton-Brea (Purchase) Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-25, through The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company right-of-way near the intersection of Richman Avenue and Richman Place, in the City of Fullerton, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That payment in the amount of $250.00 for said right-of-way is hereby authorized, in accordance with the provisions of said Pipeline License; and, Section 3. That· the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Pipeline License Agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 10, 1985. AGENDA ITEM #9(1) -DISTRICT 2 , r "P" .. Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATICN DIS'IRICTS OF ~ CDUNTY P. O. B:>X 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE . FOONTAIN VALLEY, CALIEORNIA 92708 CHAN:;E ORDER C. 0. NO. 2 ---------CON'IRAC'IOR: Mike Prlich and Sons DATE March 7, 1985 JOB: REHABILITATION OF 19 MANHOLES ON '!HE MILLER-HOLDER '!RUNK SEWER, CON'IRACT 00. 3-28R Am:>unt of this Cllange Order ~ (Deduct) $ (940 .90 > In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract l«)r.k are hereby authorized and as canp:nsation therefor, the following additions to or dedtlctions fran the contract price are hereby approved. ux:ation/Work Needed ·1. ltWmOLE 00. 5 I ICCATED 00 '!RASK AVENUE "AT NAVAJO ROAD. Ca) The Contractor is allowed costs for delay and a:mstruction of a concrete thrust block to protect an existing 33-inch West Orange County Water Board Transmission Main adjacent to the vault structure. Costs allowed are in accordance with District field change order and Contractor's extra 'WOrk r~st 716-21 dated February 13, 1985, and Section 10-4 of the General Provisions, for the lmnp sum anount of • • • Cb> Because of the interference of the water line described above, the Contractor was directed to repair the manhole without renoving the existing walls and to construct an interior surface in a design approved by District's staff. 'Ibis results in a net savings to contractor and the District has negotiated a reduction in costs in the anount of $401.00 in accordance with Contractor's credit neno Ant>unt $3,088.96 1-716 dated February 13, 1985. ($ 401.00) "Q-1" Cc> For the extra \otUrk indicated alx>ve , the Contractor is allowed a tine ext~sion of one calendar day. AGENDA ITEM #9(J) -DIST~ICT 3 Calendar Days 1 Total $2,687.96 "Q-1" Page 2 of 4 <DUNTY SANITATICN DIS'IRICTS OF CRAmE CDT.Nl'Y P. 0. B:>X 8127 -10 844 E[.IJS AVENUE . FOONTAIN VALLEY, CALm:>RNIA 92708 OIAtiiE ORDER c. o. NJ. 2 a:>N'IRACroR: Mike Prlich and Sons ---------DATE March 7, 1985 JOB: REHABILITATION OF 19 MANHOLES ON '!HE MILLER-HOLDER '!RONK SEWER, cn:J'lRACT NO. 3-28R Location/Work Needed 2. MANHOLE 00. 12, IOCATED BE'lWEEN PARmIXS AVENUE AND 'IHE STANION FIOOD. CDNIROL ClIANNEL. This manhole is located be~ a street and a flood oontrol dlannel adjacent to private residents. Contractor was directed to dlange the uethod of repair and to leave the existing walls in place and repair fran the inside. District is allowed a net credit for this repair in the Calendar Ancunt Days anount of • • • C $ 401.00 > 3. l-mNHOLE ID. 13, IOCATED ON HOPE S'IREET (EXTENDED) NOR'lll OF <liIP AVENUE. Ca) The Con tractor was directed to repair damage to the line past the limits of the vault re construction, for the lump sum arcount of • • • (b) The Contractor is allowed a one calendar day tine extension for this work. $3,046.14 "Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(J) -DISTRICT 3 1 Total ( $ 401.00) $3,046.14 "Q-2" ..... .. Page 3 of 4 · CDUNTY SANITATIOO DIS'IRICI'S OF ORAmE CDm)TY P. O. BJX 8127 -10844 Ef.I.JS AVENUE EOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANIB ORDER c. o. ro. 2 ---------CDN'IRAC'IOR: Mike Prlich and Sons DATE March 7, 1985 JOB: REHABILrrATION OF 19 MANHOLES CN 'IHE MILLER-iiOLbER '!RUNK SEWER, a::N'IRACT NO. 3-28R Calendar It:>cation~rk Needed Atrount Days 4 • z.mmoLE ro. 17, ON VALLEY VIEW SIREET BEIWEEN CERRrIOS AVENUE AND BALL ROAD. The Contractor requested to repair the manhole utilizing the existing walls as fonns thereby minimizing disruption to traffic· on Valley VieN .street. District concurred with the recomnendation and negotiated a credit in the am:>unt of • • • ($1-,500.00) 5. MANHOIE ID. 18, IOCATED NJR'IH OF PALL ROAD AND SOOIH OF FIOOD CON'mOL CliANNEL 00 VAllEi VIEW S'1REET. Contractor requested permission to repair the manhole on the interior thereby utilizing the existing walls as fanned arid for the lump sum deduction of • • • ($2,387.00) 6 • MANHOLE ID. 19 1 ON VALLEY VIEW S'1REET NOR'IH OF PALL ROAD AND 'IHE FIOOD CONIROL QIANNEL. The Contractor reqoosted permission to repair the nanhole on the interior thereby utilizing the existing walls as fanned and for the lump sum deduction of • • • ($2,387.00) 'IOTAL DEDOCTED COSTS '!HIS CEAN3E ORDER Total ( $1,500 .oo) { $2, 387 .00) { $2, 387 .00) { $ ·940. 90) 'IOTAL TIME EXTENSION 'lH IS CHAN;E ORDER 2 Calendar Days "Q-3 AGENDA ITEM #9(J) -DISTRICT 3 . "Q-3" Page 4 of 4 CDTJNTY SANITATION DIS'lRiCl'S OF ORAN;E CX>tNrY ·· P. O. B)X 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE . EOONTAIN VALLEY, CALIEORNIA 92708 aiAN3E ORDER c. o. m. 2 CON'IRAC'IOR: Mike Prlich and Sons -..,.....--=-~..,,,._ ____ _ DATE March 7, 1985 JOB: REEABILrl1ATION OF 19 MANHOLES ON 'lHE MILLER-HOLDER '!RUNK SEWER, a:JN'IRAcr NO. 3-28R '!he additional work contained in this change order can te performed incidental to the prlire work and within the tine allotted for the original plus the two days time extension granted hereby. It is , therefore , mutually agreed that no time extension other than the b«> days approved herein is required for this dlange order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequ:ntial costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by contractor. Sm+1ARY OF CONIRAcr TIME Original Cootract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. Total Time Extension Revised Cootract Tine Revised Completion Date July 2, 1984 270 Calendar Days March 28, ·1985 2 Calendar Days 23 Calendar Days 293 Calendar Days April 20, 1985 Original Contract Price $ 824,240.00 Prev. Auth. Olanges $ 42,672.98 '!his Change (Add) (Deduct) $ C 940. 90 > Amended Contract Price $ 865,972.08 Boa.rd authorization date: April 10, 1985 "Q-4" Approved: COUNTY SANITATICN DIS'IRICTS OF ORAf.GE OJUNTY, CALIFORNIA By ~, frt U,A.t-, 3/20/85 Deputy Chief Engineer AGENDA ITEM #9(J) -DISTRICT 3 "Q-4" "R-1" RESOLUTION NO. 85-65 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-21 (RULES AND REGULATIONS RE EMPLOYMENT) TO INCLUDE Y-RATING POLICY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-21, AS AMENDED, RE RULES AND REGULATIONS RE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT, PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION OF A Y-RATING POLICY * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Boards of Directors hereby approve the addition of a Y-Rating Policy to the personnel regulations of the Districts, as recommended by the Executive Committee; and, Section 2. That Section 14 of Resolution No. 79-21, as amended, is hereby further amended to include said Y-Rating Policy, as set forth below: nsection 14. Upon the determination by the General Manager, with the advice and recommendation of the Personne~ Review Committee, that a person already employed should be transferred·or reclassified to a position with a different title or range number, the assignment of a new salary to such a person shall be made as follows: A. For an employee transferred to a position of substantially the same responsibility, the employee shall be assigned a salary established for said position corresponding to the same step number occupied under the employee's former classification on the effective date of the reclassification. B. For an employee transferred to a position of higher responsibility, the employee shall be assigned a salary established for said position up to the step number occupied under the former classification on the effective date of the AGENDA ITEM #13(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "R-1" reclassification. c. For an employee moved to a position of lesser responsibility or lower salary range, the employee shall be assigned a salary,_ as follo~s: 1. Demotion -If the downward move is a demotion for disciplinary or other reasons, the employee shall be assigned to a salary step deemed appropriate by the General Manager. 2. Reclassification -If the downward move is a reclassification resulting from a review of the duties assigned to the employee, the salary of the employee shall be Y-rated, as follows: YEARS OF SERVICE PERIOD OF Y-RATE Less than 5 years 5 through 9 year~ 2 years 3 years 10 years or more 4 years During the Y-Rate period, the employee's salary shall remain frozen until (1) the salary range for the new classification becomes equal to, or greater than, the salary of the previous classification, or (2) until the Y-Rate period expires in accordance with the table above. If the new salary range becomes equal or greater than the previous salary range, the incumbent will again become eligible for appropriate merit increases and range adjustments. If the Y-Rate expires, the incwnbent will be assigned to the top step of the new range." Section 3. That any other resolution or motion that conflicts herewith is hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 4. That the authorization contained herein establishing said Y-Rating Policy shall become effective April 10, 1985. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 10, 1985. II R-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "R-2" .. . "-" \ RESOLUTION NO. 85-66 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) RE 1985 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION A..W COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 79-20, AS AMENDED, RE 1985 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM FOR PAINTING AND GROUNDS .MAINTENANCE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That a 1985 Summer Work Program for painting, groundskeeping and general cleanup work around the treatment plant facilities is hereby authorized and established; and, Section 2. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add temporary, part-time classifications thereto, as set forth below: Classification 30645 Position Classification Authorized Personnel EXHIBIT "B-4" Range No. --- Hourly Rate OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE CLASSIFICATIONS Part-time Assistant -40 $5.00/Hr. Max Approximate Monthly Equivalent Salary and that the General Manager is authorized to employ temporary, part-time personnel in said classification; and, Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized to temporarily upgrade up to eight, full-time, permanent, Maintenance Department employees to Temporary Crew Leader status and to increase their compensation one salary range "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "S-1" {5.5%) during the period set forth below in Section 7; and, Section 4. That the authorized annual expenditure for said sunnner Work Program should not exceed $179,000; and, Section S. That Resolution No. 84-63 is hereby rescinded; and, Section 6. That any other resolution or motion that conflicts herewith is hereby repealed and made-of no further effect; and, Section 7. That the authorizations contained herein shall become effective May 24, 1985, and terminate September 13, 1985. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 10, 1985. "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(s) -ALL DISTRICTS "S-2" "T" RESOLUTION NO. 85-67 APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING AN AGENCY TO BE KNOWN AS THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT AUTHORITY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO '.E:XECUTE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING AN AGENCY TO BE KNOWN AS THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT AUTHORITY WITH THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND VENTURA REGIONAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, PROVIDING FOR EXTTENSION OF THE DISTRICTS' MEMBERSHIP IN SAID AGENCY FROM JULY 1, 1985 TO JUNE 30, 1988 * * *·* * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That ~he certain Second Amendment to the Amended Joint Powers Agreement Creating An Agency To Be Known As The Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County and ~he City of Los Angeles, the City of San Diego, County Sanita~ion District No. 2 of Los Angeles County and Ventura Regional County Sanitation District, providing for extension of the Districts' membership in said agency from July 1, 1985 to June 30, 1988, and approving an increase in the annual contribut~on from member agencies from a maximum of $600,000.00 to $700,000.00, is· hereby approved and accepted~ and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County s~nitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said amendment in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 10, 1985. AGENDA ITEM #13(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "T" "'--'· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, AND 13- 0F ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MARCH 13J 1985 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS A VENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting. of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, ll and 13 of Orange County, California, was held on March 13, 1985, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 as follows: DISTRICT NO. 1: DISTRICT NO. 2: DISTRICT NO. 3: DISTRICT NO. 5: DISTRICT NO. 6: DISTRICT NO. 7: DISTRICT NO. 11: DISTRICT NO. 13: ACTIVE DIRECTORS _x_Robert Hanson, Chairman _x_Dan Griset, Chairman pro tem _x_Don Saltarelli _x_Roger Stanton x Buck Catlin, Chairman -a-Don Roth, Chairman pro tern x Richard Buck x Sam Cooper -x-Dan Grise t -x-John Holmberg -x-Carol Kawanami -x-James Neal --Bob Perry -x-Don Smith -x-Roger Stan ton x Gene Wisner a Don Roth, Chairman -x-Carrey Nelson, Chairman pro tern -x-Ruth Bailey -x-Oscar Brownell -x-Buck Catlin -x-Norman Culver -x-Don Griffin -x-Dan Griset -x-John Holmberg ·-x-Richard Partin ~James Neal -x-Richard Olson ~Richard Polis a Sal Sapien x Roger Stan ton x Charles Sylvia x Evelyn Hart, Chairman x Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tern _x_Roger Stanton x James Wahner, Chairman Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tern _x_Roger Stanton x Don Smith, Chairman -x-David Sills, Chairman pro tern -x-Richard Edgar. -x-Dan Griset x Philip Maurer _x_Roger Stanton _x_James Wahner x Ruth Bailey, Chairman x Roger Stanton, Chairman pro tern _x_John Thomas x Don Smith, Chairman -x-Michael J. Beverage x Sam Cooper _a_Don Roth _x_Roger Stanton -2- ALTERNATE DIRECTORS __ orma Crank __ Robert Luxembourger Ursula Kennedy Harriett Wieder __ Chris Norby E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. --Arthur Newton --Carrey Nelson --Robert Luxembourger --Bill Mahoney William Odlum George Scott x Norman Culver Gene Beyer --Harriett Wieder Michael J. Beverage __ H. Llewellyn Overholt Sam Cooper John Thomas Joyce Risner --Chris Norby Bob Perry James T. Jarrell --Robert Luxembourger --Bill Mahoney John Kanel George Scott --Bruce Finlayson ~-Norma Seidel ~-Jean Siriani --Harriett Wieder David Lander Bill Agee --Bill Agee Harriett Wieder -x-John Cox, Jr. Harriett Wieder Gene Beyer --Sally Anne Miller --Ursula Kennedy Robert Luxembourger Bill Agee Harriett Wieder __ Harry Green Robert P. Mandie, .Jr. Harriett Wieder __ Ruth Finley Gene Beyer· --. -Gene Wisner Carrey Nelson H. Llewellyn Overholt Harriet Wieder 3/13/85 STAFF MEMBERS. PRESENT : OTHERS PRESENT: J. Wayn~ Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Blake Anderson, Bill Butler, Gary Streed, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Ray Young, Richard von Langen, Chuck Winsor, Robert Ooten Suzanne Atkins, Harvey Hunt, aill Knopf, Sat Tamaribuchi, Kay Cooperman, Stacie Young, Darrel Miller, Peer Swan, Kathleen A. Gabriel, Diana Palmer, .J. Andrew Schlange, Art Bruington, Allen Katz, Corinne Welch, Dean Albright, ouane Flahen * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRicr 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRicr 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting ~ held February 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRicr 5 Approval of Minutes that said minutes DISTRicr 6 Approval of Minutes that said minutes DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes be deemed approved, be deemed approved, There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting . held February 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered as mailed. There beinq no corrections or amendments to the minutes or: the regular meeting held February 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minut·es of the regular meeting held February 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -3- 3/13/85 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Edgar announced that the Report of the Joint Chairman Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had issued our new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) ocean discharge permit. Last July the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) had approved the permit that is being issued jointly with EPA. Mr. Edgar reviewed the basic provisions of the five-year permit which becomes effective April 1st after a 33-day public notice period. The permit was granted because of the Districts' demonstrated ability to meet EPA criteria and the California Ocean Plan which sets standards for protection of the ocean. Approval of the permit comes after five years of intensive study by EPA and the CRWQCB. The Orange County Sanitation Districts are the first large sewerage agency in the nation to receive such a permit, and the District~' permit is serving as a model for over 200 permit applications now being processed by EPA nationwide. Under the new permit the Districts are required to increase the removal of suspended solids from 50% to 75% and biochemical oxygen demand from 35% to 60%. This improved treatment capability will be provided by recently completed advanced treatment facilities constructed by the Districts at a cost of $24 million. Chairman Edgar also noted that several years ago, the Boards implemented an industrial waste source control that enabled enable the Districts to propose substantially more restrictive toxic material limitations in the Districts' permit conditions than the California Ocean Plan requires. The Boards have also approved additional measures that will further enhance the Districts' treatment and ensure continued long-term compliance with the permit requirements. Receipt of the 30l(h) Waiver/NPDES Permit will save the citizens of Orange County $142 million in construction costs for additional facilities and $5 to $7 million in ongoing annual operating costs. The Joint Chairman also commented that a major requirement of the permit is a comprehensive ocean monitoring program that is unprecedented in scope. The monitoring program will cost the Districts $1.5 million annually. It is designed to evalue any effects of the discharge on the marine life. The permit can be modified or revoked in the unlikely event that the monitoring shows any adverse impacts on the marine environment. Mr. Edgar stated that the Districts' demonstrated ability to meet the stringent discharge requirements and the extensive scientific data that will be produced by the monitoring program will assure that the ocean waters off the Orange County coastline will be protected. Joint Chairman Edgar then reported that in January the Boards approved a cooperative effort with the County of Orange to conduct a one-day trial "Toxics Roundup" to allow homeowners and small businesses to bring limited amounts of toxic materials to a central location for proper packaging and disposal at a Class I landfill. If the trial program is successful, the Boards will be asked to consider a proposal to continue it on a permanent basis. The "Toxics Roundup" will be held Saturday, April 20th, at the abandoned Huntington Beach Transfer Station No. 2, located on Gothard between Talbert and Ellis, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. -4- 3/13/85 The Joint Chairman announced that the Buildtng Committee would meet on Thursday, March 21, at 5:30 p.m. Mr. Edgar also advised that the Fiscal Policy Committee meeting would be held on \.) Tuesday, March 26, at 4:30 p.m. He then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, March 27, at 5:30 p.m. an9 invited Directors Richard Olson and Bob Perry to attend and participate in the discussions. Chairman Edgar reported that a District No. 3 Adjourned Board Meeting was proposed for April 4, at 7:30 p.m. to receive a report from staff relative to a policy regarding settlement of claims for damage to local sewer manholes connected ~o District trunk sewers. The District No. 3 Board would consider establishing the basis and the amount of a settlement policy for that District at the adjourned meeting. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that last Report of the General Manager year Congress adjourned without renewing the Clean Water Act. Congress is-now in .session again and both the Senate and House have introduced legislation to reauthorize the Act, S.53 and H.R.8, respectively. Mr. Sylvester reviewed staff and Washington Counsel, Lee White's, efforts to obtain legislative authorization for the Districts proposed deep ocean sludge disposal research project to continue. He added that he and the General Counsel sit on an ad hoc CASA committee that will be tracking the bills to keep the Districts' interests protected. Mr. Sylvester reported on a Supplemental Agenda item relative to the proposed modifications of the diversion facilities at Plant No. 1 in order to route the \.._.) Santa Ana River Interceptor flow from Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley to Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. The Executive Committee, later in the agenda, recommends several items relative to the proposed modifications, including ratification of the Executive Committee's action in directing staff to solicit proposals to install the required pumps so that the work could be expedited. He reported that bids were received and staff recommends award to the low bidder in the amount of $15,721. The General Manager also reported on two claims appearing on the Supplemental Agenda, filed against District No. 3 relative to accidents which occurred in connection with the construction of Contract No. 3-28R, Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. He recommended the routine actions appearing on the agenda to receive and file said claims and refer them to the appropriate pa~ties for further action. Mr. Sylvester then reported on a Supplemental Agenda item in District 11 relative to an oil spill in the Coast Highway Trunk Sewer Siphon. When this occurs, the oil backs up at a siphon under the Southern California Edison steam plant sea water intake and outlet lines and plugs the siphon. The material must be pumped out and disposed of at a Class I landfill. He indicated that the staff had developed a cost-saving method of removing the oil using a vacuum truck and then mixing it with sawdust to be transported more cost effectively in larger trucks to the Class I dump site. The General Manager advised that authorization of this emergency expenditure in an amount not to exceed $50,000 had been received from the Chairman of District No. 11, and the agenda item is to ratify said action in accordance with the procurement procedures. -s- .- 3/13/85 The General Manager then announced that a new Directors' orientation session is being planned in the near future for the benefit of any of the Directors that wished to attend. The Districts' long-range facilities planning, budgets and proposed new programs would be reviewed at the meeting. A tour of Reclamation Plant No. 1 would also be conducted. More information and a firm date would be mailed to the Directors when the plans are finalized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital outlay Revolving Fund - Joint Working Capital Fund Self-Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICT NO. 13 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Jobs Nos. PW-061R-2 and 2/06/85 $459,498.78 132,559.62 120,832.61 4,609.72 31,498.73 93,115.52 8 ,841. so 40.76 4,406.19 19,387.10 109,446.59 3,372.92 $987,610.04 2/20/85 $ 258,158.72 317,424.97 110,309.31 3,828.84 869.64 23,417.77 13,444.84 16,903.39 5,568.73 14,076.20 1,719,564.06 7,723.70 $2,491,290.17 Moved, seconded and duly carried: PW-061R-3 to Kiewit Pacific Company That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-~2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Rehabilitation of Digesters C & D at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-061R-2, and Rehabilitation of Digesters F & G at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-061R-3, to Kiewit Pacific Company in the amount of $2,435,555.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the staff to complete Job No. PW-125 (Rebid) under force account Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to complete the Entry Gates. at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-125 (Rebid), under force account procedures for a total amount not to exceed $80,000.00; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit bids for the individual items of work in accordance with the Districts' procurement regulations, and to issue purchase order contracts for such items to the lowest responsible bidders. -6- 3/13/85 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Sludge Management Agreement with That the Boards of Directors hereby EKO Systems/Orange County, Ltd. adopt Resolution No. 85-50, approving ~ (Specification No. S-030) Amendment No •. 1 to the Sludge Management Agreement with EKO Systems/Orange County, Ltd., providing for a time extension relative to obtaining a site for offsite reuse/disposal of Districts' sludge from February 15, 1985 to April 15, 1985. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Job No. PW-119 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Paving and Drainage at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, authorizing an addition of $5,405.24 to the contract with Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, for revisions, installation of additional drainage facilities and a deletion of soil amendment, and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-129 specifications for Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, authorizing an addition of $714.75 to the contract with Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, for removal of heat exchange equipment which interfered with the placement of the lube oil tank, and granting a time extension ~ of two calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. Pl-21 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-44, approving plans and specifications for·Installation of Replacement of Centrifuges with Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-21, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 17021 issued to Advanco Constructors, Inc. re Specification No. M-016 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 17021 issued to Advance Constructors, Inc. for Installation of Pressure Relief Bypass Around 10 Positive Displacement Primary Pumps, Specification No. M-016, increasing the total amount from $15,810.00 to $16,354.40 for additional work to install two valves supplied by the Districts at Pumps A, B and c. -7- '--' . 3/13/85 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Specification No. M-016 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-45, accepting Installation of Pressure Relief Bypass Around 10 Positive Displacement Primary Pumps, Specification No. M-016, as compl~te, and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Purchase Order Contract re Specification No. M-020 to Spiess Construction Company, Inc. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation re award of purchase order contract for Installation of Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers and Appurtenant Equipment, Specification No. M-020, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Spiess Construction Company, Inc. in the total amount of $128,610.00. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Specification No. P-073 to Gas Chem Products, Inc. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation re award of purchase of Wood Shavings/Sawdust, Specification No. P-073, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Gas Chem ·Products, Inc. for the price of $4.19 per yard, for a total amount not to exceed $63,000.00 plus tax for a one-year period commencing March 15, 1985. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement with K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. re preparation of an EIR on the Master Plan of Joint Works Waste- water Treatment and Disposal Facilities Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement with K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan of Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities, providing for additional services to incorporate the findings of the Digester Gas Utilization Study; to prepare an Executive Summary; and to respond to public commentary received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-46, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement with K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan of Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities, providing for sa°id additional services to incorporate the findings of the Digester Gas Utilization Study; to prepare an Executive Sumrnary1 and to respond to public commentary received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, on an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead and profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $15,770.00, increasing the total maximum compensation from $34,165.00 to an amount not to exceed $49,935.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -8- 3/13/85 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seco~ded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 5 to the Agreement with John Carollo That the Selection Committee Engineers re Job No. P2-25-2 certification of the final negotiated "-1) fee for Addendum No. 5 to Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of the Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, providing for preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Manual, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved, and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-47, approving Addendum No. 5 to Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of the Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, providing for preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Manual, on an hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead, plus profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $18,500.00, increasing the total maximum compensation from $664,231.00 plus actual cost for outside services not to exceed $25,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $682,731.00 plus said outside services. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement to the City of Fountain Valley re widening of Garfield Avenue Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-48, approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement to the City of Fountain Valley for right-of-way required in connection with street improvements and widening of Garfield Avenue east of Ward Street and future maintenance of said area adjacent to the Districts' property, at no cost to the City. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the Fiscal Policy Committee to solicit proposals for Districts' annual financial audit Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Fiscal Policy Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals from auditing firms to conduct the annual financial audit of the Districts' books of account. ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for six- month period ending December 31, 1984 ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file and approve written Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff Summary Financial Report for six-month period ending December 31, 1984, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Moved, seconded and duly carried: report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on February 27, 1985, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -9- .- ... . 3/13/85 ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Joint Treatment Works wastewater Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Fixing April 10, 1985 as the date for public hearing on the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Draft EIR Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Joint Treatment works wastewater Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report be, and is · Moved, seconded and duly carried: That April 10, 1985, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Office, be, and are hereby, fixed as the date, time and place for public hearing on the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report. ALL DISTRICTS Establishing May 1, 1985 as the final date for receipt of comments for Joint Treatment Works Waste- Moved, seconded and duly carried: That May 1, 1985, be, and is hereby, established as the final date for which water Master Plan Draft EIR all comments must be received on the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report. ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to modifications to incoming wastewater diversion structure at Plant No. 1 to accommodate pretreated Stringfellow wastewater The following actions were taken relative to modifications to incoming wastewater diversion structure at Plant No. 1 re accommodation of pretreated Stringfellow wastewater to allow processing of Sunflower Trunk flows at Santa Ana River Trunk flows to Plant No. 1 and diversion of entire Plant No. 2: Approving modifications to incoming wastewater diversion structure at Plant No. 1 re acconunodation of pretreated Stringfellow wastewater Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the modifications to incoming wastewater diversion structure at Plant No. 1 re accommodation of pretreated Stringfellow wastewater to allow processing of Sunflower Trunk flows at Plant No. 1 and diversion of entire Santa Ana River Trunk flows to Plant No. 2, be, and are hereby, approved. Authorizing completion of Job No. PW-142 as an urgency measure That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize completion of the SARI/Sunflower Diversion Structure Modifications, Job No. PW-142, as an urgency measure, for a total amount not to exceed $65,000.00. Ratifying action of the Executive Committee in directing staff to purchase the pumps and controls required for Job No. PW-142 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the action of the Executive Committee in directing staff to purchase the pumps and controls required for the SARI/Sunflower Diversion Structure Modifications, Job No. PW-142, in an amount not to exceed $30,000.00 (included in above $65,000.00 maximum), be, and is hereby, ratified. -10- 3/13/85 Ratifying action of the Executive Committee in directing the staff to solicit informal quotes for __ installation of pumps and controls re Job No. PW-1421 and authorizing award of Purchase Order Contract to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. for said work Moved; seconded and duly carried: That the actions of the Executive Committee in directing the staff to ~ solicit informal quotes for installation of the pumps and controls for the SARI/Sunflower Diversion Structure Modifications, Job No. PW-142 be, are and are hereby, ratified1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid tabulation and recommendation re award of a Purchase Order Contract to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $15,721.00 for installation of said pumps, piping and appurtenances for the SARI/Sunflower Diversion Structure Modifications, Job No. PW-142, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to award said Purchase Order Contract to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $15,721.00 (included in above $65,000.00 maximum) for installation of pumps, piping and appurtenances for the SARI/Sunflower Diversion Structure Modifications, Job No. PW-142. ALL DISTRICTS Respectfully denying the requests of the Cities of Fountain Valley and Newport Beach for the Districts to pay for an independent consultant to study the proposed Stringfellow plan Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the requests of the Cities of Fountain Valley and Newport Beach for the Districts to pay for an independent consultant engaged by the cities to study the proposed Stringfellow plan be, and are hereby, respectfully denied. Director James Neal requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Adopting a general policy re Settlement of Claims for Damage to Local Sewer Manholes connected to Districts' trunk sewers sewers, as follows: Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors do hereby adopt a general policy re Settlement of. Claims for Damage to Local Sewer Manholes connected to Districts' trunk POLICY OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS RE SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGE TO LOCAL SEWER MANHOLES The Boards of Directors, upon receiving a detailed report of its staff and General Counsel, relating to damages incurred by Cities and Sanitary Districts to their local manhole facilities which are located in the proximate vicinity of Districts' trunk sewer lines, determined that it was in the best interests of the Districts to effect a settlement of claims for reimbursement of these damages by each of the entitites. The Directors have taken into consideration the relative degree of responsibility \w) between the Sanitation Districts and the local sewering agency, together with the estimated costs of repair of said facilities, and based thereon, the Boards of Directors do hereby adopt as their policy: -11- 3/13/85 "The Boards of Directors do approve the settlement of claims made by any local sewering agency wherein damage has been incurred to their local trunk sewer facilities, including manholes, which are connected to the Districts' Trunk Sewers. Pursuant to this policy, the Districts will pay to each local sewering agency, the sum of (amount to be determined by each respective District) for each manhole proven to have incurred damage resulting, in part, from hydrogen sulfide gases emanating from the Districts' trunk sewers. The policy is to be implemented by the payment of this sum, provided the Districts receive a general release of all claims including a waiver of any future claim for damages to their facilities and that the local sewering agency will immediately undertake to repair its manhole facilities with materials and in accordance with specifications approved by the Districts. This policy shall further be limited with regard to reimbursement for manholes already repaired by any local sewering agency to those which have been repaired since January 1, 1982." and, FURTHER MOVED: That each respective District be, and is hereby, directed to establish the payment amount to be allowed per manhole for said claims for damage to local sewer manholes connected to Districts' trunk sewers. DISTRICT 3 Directing staff to prepare a status report re corrective action on deteriorated manholes and on ·the Malcolm Pirnie odor control study Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, directed to prepare a status report re corrective action on deteriorated manholes and on the Malcolm Pirnie odor control study relative to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer for submission to the District 3 Board at an adjourned meeting to be held on April 4, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. to consider establishing the payment amount to be allowed per manhole pursuant to the general policy re settlement of claims for damage to local sewer manholes. ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to DOHS/SAWPA proposal to pretreat groundwater from Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site for discharge into the Districts' sewerage system for further treatment and disposal Receive and file letter from the Orange County water District The following actions were taken relative to DOHS/SAWPA proposal to pretreat groundwater from Stringfellow waste Disposal Site for discharge into the Districts' sewerage system for further treatment and disposal: Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from the Orange County Water District dated February 27, 1985, supporting the diversion of the SARI line to Plant No. 2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered f ilea·. Receive and file letter from the City of Costa Mesa Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from the City of Costa Mesa dated February 25, 1985, expressing concern re the proposed acceptance of pretreated Stringfellow groundwater, and supporting the diversion of the SARI line to Plant No. 2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -12- 3/13/85 Receive and file letter from Mayor Ben Nielsen, City of Fountain Moved, seconded and duly carried: Valley That the letter from Mayor Ben Nielsen, City of Fountain Valley, dated February 21, 1985, transmitting a copy of an independent report commissioned from George Kurilko, Ph.D., by the City, finding. that the Stringfellow proposal is in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal requirements and should not have a significant impact on the quality of treated wastewater from the Districts' treatment plants1 supporting the diversion of the SARI line to Plant No. 2; and requesting consideration of a supplemental trunk line monitoring program, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and~ FURTHER MOVED: That said request for a supplemental trunk line monitoring program be referred to the Executive Committee for study and report back. Receive and file letter from Moved, seconded and duly carried: CyPress County water District That the letter from Cypress County Water District, dated February S, 1985, expressing concern over acceptance of pretreated Stringfellow groundwater through the Districts' sewerage system, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Final Report, Environmental Review for Treated waste Discharge, Interim Treatment and Disposal Program, Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site, dated March, 1985 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Final Report, Environmental Review for Treated Waste Discharge, Interim Treatment and Disposal Program, Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site, dated Mar.ch 1985 prepared State of by the Department of Health Services, Health and welfare Agency, California, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Directing staff to authorize SAWPA to issue an industrial waste discharge permit to California Department of Health Services re Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to authorize Santa Ana wastershed Project Authority (SAWPA) to issue an industrial waste discharge permit to California Department of Health Services (OOHS) for discharge of pretreated groundwater from the Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site to the Districts' sewerage system, upon completion of the modifications to the incoming wastewater diversion structure at Plant No. 1. Director Roger Stanton requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Report of Select Committee to Advise the Staff re proposed formation of District No. 14 Joint Chairman Edgar reported that after extensive negotiations, the Districts and the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) had reached an agreement in connection with proposed formation of District No. 14 to serve the IRWD area. The agreement is in accordance with the conceptual approval given by the Joint Boards in November, 1984. He added that the agreement is a fair agreement and beneficial to both parties, and it was now appropriate for the Sanitation Districts to consider formally approving said agreement. · -13- .- 3/13/85 The Joint Chairman reported·that an Environmental Impact Report on the proposed formation of District No. 14 is being prepared and is scheduled to be issued for · public commentary in April. ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file and approve the Report of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Report of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff dated March 1, 1985, re proposed formation of District No. 14 to serve the Irvine area, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Agreement with the Irvine Ranch Water District re proposed formation of District No. 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-49, approving Agreement with the Irvine Ranch Wate~ District re acquisition of a member agency interest in Sanitation Districts' facilities relating to the proposed formation of County Sanitation District No. 14. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Staff Report re Ferrous Chloride System for Digester Gas Sulfide Reduction, Job No. PW-141 The General Manager reported that the Districts' are required to comply by July 1, 1985 with the new South Coast Air Quality.Management District (AQMD) regulations for Rule 431.1, which . restricts the sulfur content of digester gas utilized by the Districts' digesters to 800 parts per million. Currently, the gas contains 2,000 to 5,000 parts per million. The only proven system that will enable compliance on such a short time schedule is by installing a ferrous chloride dosing system at a cost of approximately $450,000. However, before construction can commence AQMD must issue a Permit to Construct. The Districts have filed for the permit but it has yet to be issued by AQMD. Mr. Sylvester expressed staff's concern that if the permit is not . received within the next few days to enable construction to proceed, the project would be delayed and it would not be possible to meet the July 1st compliance date. In that event it would be necessary to request a variance from AQMD. He, therefore, recommended that staff and the General Counsel be authorized to file for such a variance in the event the permit is not immediately forthcoming or if the permit or events make compliance by July 1st impractical or unattainable. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-141 specifications for Ferrous Chloride System for Digester Gas Sulfide Reduction, Job No. PW-141, making a clarification relative to the bonus/liquidated i damages (penalty) provisions of the contract to expedite completion of the job to ensure compliance with AQMD regulations, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Job No. PW-141 to Fraser Corporation Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-43, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation re Ferrous Chloride System for Digester Ga$ Sulfide Reduction, Job No. PW-141, and authorizing the General Manager to -14- 3/13/85 award said contract to Fraser Corporation in the amo~nt of $376,000.00 with provision for early completion bonus of $1,000.00 per day, not to exceed $24,000.00, and penalty assessment of $1,000.00 per day for late completion after May 31st, upon receipt of a Permit to Construct from AQMD. A certified copy of ~ this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to file a request with AQMD for a variance re Rule 431.1 if Permit to Construct Ferrous Chloride System is not forthcoming from AQMD It was moved, seconde~ and duly carried: That the staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to file a request with the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) for a variance relative to compliance with Rule 431.1 regulations governing sulfur content of digester gas, if a Permit to Construct the Ferrous Chloride System for Digester Gas Sulfide Reduction, Job No. PW-141, is not immediately received from AQMD, or if the permit conditions or subsequent events make compliance by July 1st impractical or unattainable. ALL DISTRICTS Status report re formation of Special Advisory Committee re Water Quality in the Santa Ana River Basin In response to an inquiry relative to formation of the Special Advisory Committee re Water Quality in the Santa Ana River Basin to be comprised of upper (Riverside/San Bernardino County) and lower (Orange County) Santa Ana River Basin officials, which was previously authorized by the Boards, the Joint Chairman stated that he is placing an item on the agenda for the next Executive Committee meeting to discuss the Committee's goals and objectives and its member.ship. The purpose of the proposed committee is to maintain an ongoing dialogue and keep citizens and officials in Orange County informed about Stringfellow and the programs to improve the water quality in the entire Santa Ana River Basin. Mr. Edgar indicated that he had also asked the Districts' General Counsel to review the agreement with SAWPA relative to the rights and responsibilities of the respective parties, and to report to the Executive Committee. DISTRICT 1 Approving and authorizing execution of a License Agreement with the City of Santa Ana for a bicycle trail Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution ~o. 85-51-1, approving and authorizin4 execution of a License Agreement with the City of Santa Ana providing for use of District right-of-way for a bicycle trail adjacent to the Oyer Road Trunk Sewer extending northeasterly from Bristol Street to Talbert Avenue, at no cost to the City. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourn~d. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:11 p.m., March 13, 1985. DISTRICT 2 Approving plans and specifications re Contract No. 2-6-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-52-2, approving -15- 3/13/85 plans and specifications for the Taft Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-6-2, and City of Orange Street Improvements, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Approving and authorizing execution of a Pipeline License Agreement with the Atchison, Tooeka and Santa Fe Railway Company re Contract No. 2-6-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Tha·t the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-53-2, approving and authorizing execution of a Pipeline License Agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for right-of-way required in connection with construction of the Taft Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-6-2, and authorizing payment of $250.00 in accordance witq the provisions of said Pipeline License Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Contract No. 2-10-lA Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for the Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-lA, transmitting fixed prices for gravel and bedding under the Schedule of Prices, advising that the flow may not be interrupted during construction, transmitting the signed Cal Trans Permit and clarifying jacking requirements at the invert of the Ocean View Channel, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Contract No. 2-10-lA to Nuevo Camino Constructors Company That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-54-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding a contract for the Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-lA, to Nuevo Camino Constructors Company in the amount of $5,090,467.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:11 p.m., March 13, 1985. DISTRICT 3 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Contract No. 3-21-3R Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Trench . Reconstruction, Los Alamitos Boulevard, Contract No. 3-21-3R, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of $5,184.88 to the contract with Copp Contracting, Inc., be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 3 Accepting Contract No. 3-21-3R as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-55-3, accepting -16- 3/13/85 Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos Boulevard, Cont~act No. 3-21-3R, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion, and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifica.tions re Contract No. 3-29R That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-56-3, approving plans and specifications for Manhole Repairs, Knott Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-29R, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt o.f bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Receive, file and deny the claim of David Mikus Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the claim of David Mikus dated November 27, 1984, in the amount of $30,000.00 for alleged damages resulting from a motorcycle accident at the site of Contract No. 3-28R, Rehabilitation.of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, be,_and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the District's liability claims administrator, General Counsel, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny the claim of Frank P. McHale That the claim of Frank P. McHale dated December 19, 1984, in the amount of ~ $179.08 for alleged damages to his vehicle resulting from an accident at the site of Contract No. 3-28R, Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk sewer, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the District's liability claims administrator, General Counsel, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., Thursday, April 4, 1985, at the Districts' administrative offices. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m., March 13, 1985. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m., March 13, 1985. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m., March 13, 1985. -17- 3/13/85 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of staff in procuring emergency services re That the action of staff in procuring Contract No. ll-13-2-M2 services.for Emergency Removal and Disposal of Oil Spilled into the District's Coast Highway Trunk Sewer Siphon, Contract No. ll-13-2-M2, for a total amount not to exceed $50,000.00 be, and is hereby, ratified. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m., March 13, 1985. DISTRICT 13 Approving Preliminary Timetable for Collection of District No. 13 User Fees on property tax bills The General Manager reported that upon formation of District No. 13, the Board adopted an ordinance that established a $70 user fee to finance the District's annual operation and maintenance costs. At the present time invoices are issued to collect this fee, but the original formation plan provided for the collection of the annual user fee on the property tax bills, which is the most efficient, cost-effective method of collection. In order to implement this method of collection, State law requires that all property owners be notified and that a public hearing be held. Mr. Sylvester then commented briefly on the preliminary timetable for implementing collection of the fee on the property tax bills commencing with the 1985-86 fiscal year. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Preliminary Timetable for Collection of District No. 13 User Fees on the property tax bills beginning in 1985-86 dated March 6, 1985, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m., March 13, 1985. DISTRICT 7 Approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement to the City of Santa Ana re extension of Wilshire Avenue Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-57-7, approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement to the City of Santa Ana for execution of a Grant of Easement to the City of Santa Ana for right-of-way required to extend Wilshire Avenue, westerly of Village Way, at no cost to the City. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -18- 3/19/85 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly car-r ied: Rejecting all bids received for Manhole Repair, Red Hill Avenue, That the Board of Directors hereby 7th Sewer Maintenance District, adopts Resolution No. 85-58-7, to \.._) Contract No. 7-SMD-l, and referring receive and file bid· tabulation and to staff for re-evaluation recommendation and rejecting ali bids received for Manhole Repair, Red Hill Avenue, 7th Sewer Maintenance District, Contract No. 7-SMD-l; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said project be, and is hereby, referred to staff for re-evaluation and recommendation. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a·part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Actions relative to the Negative Declaration for the Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4 The following actions were taken relative to the Negative Declaration for the Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4: Staff report re Negative Joint Chairman Edgar reported that Declaration re Main Street Trunk the Board had previously reviewed an Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4 Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment on the Main Street Trunk Sewer and determined that a Negative Declaration was appropriate inasmuch as any environmental impacts could be mitigated. Said trunk sewer extends from the intersection of Von Karman Avenue and Main Street to the San Diego Creek (Peters Canyon Wash) and will provide an alternate service connection for proposed District No. 14. The size of the proposed sewer was increased from 21 inches to 60 inches in order to accommodate the IRWD flow. The Environmental Impact Report on the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities to Serve County Sanitation District No. 1, the Northern \:.) Half of District No. 6, and District No. 7, prepared in April 1984, addressed the impacts associated with accommodating growth in the Irvine Business Complex area and is incorporated, by reference, into the Negative Declaration. The Negative Declaration prepared by the District's consultant, Courton and Associates, had been circulated for review and comment. All comments received were addressed by the·consultant. The Negative Declaration finds that there will not be any significant long-term effects on the environment as a result of this project due to the mitigation measures that have been incorporated into said project. Receive and file written comments re Negative Declaration for the Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written comments received from the following relative to the Negative Declaration for the Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: (1) Orange County Transit District dated February 12, 1985 (2) Orange County water District dated February 20, 1985 (3) County of Orange EMA dated February 25, 1985 .• (4) City of Irvine dated February 25, 1985 (5) state of California, Office of Planning and Research, dated February 28, 1985\...J -19- 3/13/85 Receive and file Main Street Trunk Sewer Negative Declaration and Initial Study prepared by Courton and Associates Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Main Street Trunk Sewer Negative Declaration and Initial Study prepared by Courton and ·Associates, be, and is hereby, received and.ordered filed. Receive and file Staff Summary of Negative Declaration Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Summary of the Negative Declaration for the Main Street Trunk Sewer be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Approving the Negative Declaration for the Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4, and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-59-7, approving the Negative Delcaration for the Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4, and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination re said project. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Contract No. 7-2C-4 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-60-7, approving plans and specifications for the Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2C-4, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:16 p.m., March 13, 1985. ~·,...~ <:~ . -------Secretary, Boa ds of Directors . County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 -20- @., I ,j rl l'' 11 ,:1 l"1 I' I·· ' j'"i 1·· i••I 1,,1 :.! '. "l I/ J I 1 · I ... .. I;:\ 1·:: 1:. :.:1! II 1··. I :::; :'I I l,.' l··I 1-·: , .. i I l' FUND MO IJ/lf\R/lrl!T r-.o. U7276A 07~7E.9 C7277Cl (17 2 771 ')72772 072773 L 7 ~· 7 7'f u7 2 71'0 (J2.11b (112771 ·J72178 il7 (! 719 0727~0 07?761 c 1(': 16:? H27b3 ;;7 ?7£:.4 1172785 ... C.72786 :..::;a il7C>787 I G 7 2 78H f--1 .. C727fl.9 (17:? 791) ;)7 ~: 7';11 {l 7 2 792 0"/2793 l:7' 79't f,7~'7«;;5 ;;72'/% :i"/2797 U7279c5 L7275q 11;;800 l".7~ll0} (17 t-f'. ;j~ i) "/ ~ ?03 'J7:?ftlllt ;;12~u~ .17 2f: ;,l(, (· 7 2 f<(ll i1"/2fHHI ,j 7t:.·p[Ji:.. n121_~1~. Ii"/~) E• l l •i 7:?H12 n Hill 3 'i}~?g -Jl fllST ~Jllf<KIM-Ct.f-IT/lL 1·rrnr1.sslr.JC OAff 1n11n~. PAG[ kt"J'OHT ~.llf'otifk AP't'3 Ci\UNlY SAl\:JTATJON l.!l'llPICTS OF O~!\~JCf COUNTY CLAJMS rAIO U2/Gb/B5 V[ N('OP llDVANCEO POLYMfB SYSTEMS, il>JC. AOVANCC CONSTRUCTCRSt INC. ALBE~TS0NS FOOD CEHl(R /1 Llj ER T S 0 N S I N C • , 11 {; 7 u /;LLIEO CIH.MICAL CC•RF. ALLI~-CHALMLRS CORP. /~LU SALES t I NC .. AMlRICtN CYANAMID COMPANY AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH AM[RlCAN TfCHNJCAL $UPFLY ANAHfIH SEYfR CONSTRUCTION lHf ANfttOR PACKING CO. ANILLO JNOUSTRIES AOUA Dt:rJ CORI'. ARMSTRONG PETROLEUM ARHO~-RISCO, I~C. ASSOCl/ITJON Of METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. OC INOU~TkIAL SU~PLY, INC. OKK CORPORATION tiJL/IRY U/1l<ER HAKfR ~LYWOOD CO., INC. P.£CKMAN INDUSTRIAL HIG ~O~ HfNTAL CO. ALACK ~ OECKfR MfG. Cu. B~fA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ~ROOKS lNSTkUMfNTS FHJ R K f l N li 11\i [ Er< 1 N G C 0 • C K H RlCCNLllTIONING CO. CK PUHi· AND DE\.rATEHING COHI'. CPl CALIFOR~JA, INC. f.l1L-TY CALGON CORPGRAllON fALif. t..~soc. (Jf SAN. /IHrJCJfS J LI H N C AH 0 L l 0 L" U Cd r-, F ER S JOHN CAROLLO fNGINflRS CtlfSTl:~TOllJ LOS ANGfLE.~ CHEVPON u.s.A.t INC. CIVIC Cft'ilrH LIJCt\ & SHE CU/ISJ f'IPflll\i[ CO. C 0 MI' U 1 U< 1~ IW C E '.; ~. H~ G 5 U F" f"' L I l ~ COllJNf"ll. r11rVROLL:T c (i I\ !) 0 L I [) A lL (1 E Ir c Tf( I c A l. r· I ~:: l • CU~TIMLrJTAL Alti TOOLS, n.c. [ 0N1 ~Cl CC 1"C [ 11 S CG RP. c [} r. Ff " I ~; r ,, G y ~. r h v I Cf s A.l"OUNT '!.LB7.7!1 •J.lt 7 ' ,;P, •) • ..:1 :J $3 l. 37 !f2'H. 02 i2, 189. i+:~ $1,691.'fU :i..30U.02 ll,6'10.dh $58.00 $116 • 2H H:ia.OJ ~-.H l .fl5 '!.2tl7.41 'l:?5,'-iUl.R2 t21.6E; :i.11;).53 $ ,, ' 7 !11 • ll 0 $'ft31J2.95 .!.52. 3f:. :l.'fbt416.53 £5 9. 2" $174.•J') 1-57.2'1 '176!).tJO 'f.62. 86 12,029.<Hl $268.12 'f.1Jl.6H :f.2.~0.JO :i. 2 t IJ / 't •II G S-590.110 :i0 l7'f.J6 $8~6.60 U t65'l.OO Htl27.n :L6t'l92.q2 32?7.5H tH•tlJ34.t~n !f,}8 7. Lt't 1{nH't5 • .5:1 ~ ] 1 't • t1 3 1· :~'.I• l '~ !, ~I ' } It !_, o ~) 2 'I. ,;!6 lt o Clf, 1. l ' '? 11 ii • r.. :~ 'i ~Sil. n DESCRIPTION LAB SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR P2-25-2 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT CHEMICAL COAGULANTS PUMP PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CllEMICAL COAGULANTS ALARM SYSTEM R~PAIRS OFFICE SUPPLIES CSDOC #7 REPAIRS COMPRESSOR PARTS USE. CHARGE OVERPAYMENT CHEMICAL COAGULANTS U$E CHARG~. QV~RPAYME~T ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FEE TUBING SMALL HARDWARE SLUDGE HAULING AND DISPOSAL EMPbOY~~_Ml~EA~~ SMALL HARDWARE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRA$H DISPOSAL TOOLS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Pl~E-~tiPPLIES ... -- PUMP REPAIRS CSOOC #1 I EMERGENCY ~EPA IRS WORD PROCESSING MAINTENANCE USE CllARGE OVERPAYMENT CHEMl~Al CQAGULANT$ ANNUAL MEMBERSlllP FEE ENGR. P2-25-2 ENGR. J-6-2 1 Pl-22 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES GASOLINE, ENGINE Oil LOCKS CSDOC #11 EMERGENCY REPAIRS OFFICE SUPPLEIS TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TOOLS CONTROL EQUIPMENT ENGINE PARTS (' ( ( 0 I '.r i l I'' 1.:.· 1 ... ( J· ·1 " "I ... r-·. ,··1c· I i:: . )(. lo:ic ~:1c ... 1.:1lc 1 ,, ·o .. :, ::11 !.,( "' ·1"· "· .. It, ,I ,.J ;:.·:le l::'J I J.. LI ··1 : .. , ; , .... 1 :::1 •.I :1!·- 1, ··: .1 ....... @; -· f :i i·I ( I'' :..1 "i.! 1 .. 1·•1 II I ,.1 i,, I·-. '•·' ··1· " '· ,., ... ' '.'.j I .1 1.' 1·::;; 1 ~~1~~ "1 - I'"' . '.1 J (. 1:.1 .. 1, ''! i r· I:. , .. ! j"! 1·. I ('.: .".I i· ! Li v ( fl'MO MO b;ARR ANT NO. 01n14 C..72°bl5 t.72Hlb r. 72817 f,72AlE i.7?HlY r.n>82~ C72f'21 C:72822 {17 2f:.23 iJ7 ('H2 1t fl72P.25 ·072626 (•72f27 L72B2ti (17 :':: fi2Y &7 2El3C 072H31 672832 :l12B33 r.7~63'1 · ·u121!35 07:>836 ')7;?837 iJ72B30 072839 0728't(J C72fl'll fl7 2f.'12 ~ 7:: A'13 f, 7 2f:.'I'+ :j 1 ~ p 'I~) 074"8%. 072R47 t1H·8'lfl ~ "/ 2f.'i CJ CJ72fi~IJ C728~1 f172£~2 ~12e5:~ l7 2l1~4 r. ·11-i.15~ .. f.72~% l7?8~7 012l\58 {. 7 :' l• ~)tj ( q 1 .:., ') -.J T n I ~ l ~J 0 R K I ri r. L A I' J I :.. L F ~ 0 c r <:: s I NG 0 AT r l / 3 1 I B 5 p AG [ i.' Rf~Okl NUMHEM AP43 Cf.llr.TY ~,Afl.IHTION 01srn1c1s Of llhflfH,f COUNTY Vf Nf;Of? COIH -R G$ I or. PR C:IJUCT $ P. E. CJULTlk Lk~N( RENTAL COUNTY M~ IN Tf. NAN Cf ~Ef\ VI Cf.~. CAL \JATER CYCLOPS COMF ANY 0[LCG-P.[t-1Y DENNY'S ff[STAURANT u12n5 DfW-PAk SAL£S ! SERVJCf l Hf 0 I CKS ON CO Mr AtJ\' DORADO ENTERPRISES, I~C. OUCTILf IRCN FlPf RfSfARCH ASN OYNf[R CORPORATIOh f.ASTMAN, INC. [NCHANTER, INC. ENERGY UEV. Of CAL•t INr. "rN~lNEE~S SAL£S-S£Rv1ct co. [X,ON COMP~NY, u.s.A. FILTER SU~FLY CO. FISCHER & PO~TfR CO. F I S ~I EH C 0 N TR 0 L f. FLAT & VERTICAL CONC~ET£ Ful<D AEROsh\cE· h; COMM. i:uRr. CLIFFORD A. FO~KfRT CITY OF FULLlRTON ~ERBERT L. GALLEGLY GAMMA ~ANUFACTURINC, INC. CANAHL LUMBfR CO. CLAIMS PAI~ ~2/J6/d~ AMOUNT :&.4.tl't.28 1848.uu ':t.6~0.\JU i.2H5.'10 $950.uO $'.),5'18.11 J.4"3.25 i3.b67.6tJ u 7.92 12.087.36 120.0(; t6 9. l '+ :!.ltl..S2.q6 '!.3,500.0(, U5.G5 111248~68 i2,101.09 $'t3.3H $3,708.88 $32. c.o $368.50 U9t'l6'1~0't :U,616.LL~ 114.1 11 i1t,73o.ila 15u2.5Y i1195.•n DESCIUPT ION FIBERGLASS TANK CRANE RENTAL WINDOW WASHING SERVICE WATER SOFTENER RENTAL CSDOC #1 I EMERGENCY REPAIRS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT HOSE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PLANT #2 REPAIRS CONFERENCE REGISTRATION TOOLS OFF I CE SUPPLIES OCEAN MONITORING USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT P~MP ~~~TS . . . ... USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES REGULATOR PARTS CORE DRILLING . USE-CHARGE OVERPAYMENT---~--- SURVEY 5-6 WATER USEAGE C s· D 0 C fl 1 EM E R G E NC Y . RE PA I RS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT BUILDING MATERIALS PLANT. 'j P{PiNG . GLASS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ( GATES fIAERGLASS INST~Cl£R5 b[M-0'-LITE ~LASTICS CORP. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. GENf.RAL ~f.DICAL CfNTERS &ENt: fiAL T fLH'HCJN[ Co. GRIFFITH Alh TOOLS 12,587~22 U 1 't. Y'J i.'198.26 'i.24 6 •AB 'lE.15.60 1133.02 ~ 4b~. fl(J !f. 461 •• H! RETIRED.EMPLOYEES MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM TELEPHONE Cit~OOM'~ /lSPliAL T tlACH CCMPANY tlALPRI N SUf-l)L Y C<i. TED t. HAf'Mf.TT HAHRINGTON INDUSTRIAL fL/lSTICS J 0 Ii N C • Hf Nfl [ RH k C 0 n INC • ~.c. H[NORI[ & CO., INC. ti f i< C llL t S 1 ti r. • llGf\l[YUFLLt INC. fl • ~ • H lJ c:.1~ r ~ c 0 • ' I N r • flTY Of lllHJllMFTOl'J ~ifACH 11 lJ t~ T J N G l GI\: i; [ 1\l h HU fi B LI\ ~'. T f. N' f: U t'>Jl I N GT 0 !\ V f.L L f Y ~ C lll-.' I N ~1 C. YC l E RY :l,j 2. •)CJ 1.2,830.~0 'd2"1.5t1 'lbL\.28 :f ~, 2B 8. 9~. ~. 'J t 4 5 o • H ~. 1474. ~ ., i !. [, 3. ~l ( :t 17h.<j11 1.~11. '1~1 1.:.? 5. 4.:.. TOOLS CSDOC #11 EMERGENCY REPAIRS LAB SUPPLIES SMALL HARDWARE CS DOC H 11 EMERGENCY REPAIRS PIPE SUPPLIES SAFETY SIGNS PIPE SUPPLIES CHEMICAL COAGULANTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PA I N r· S U P P l I E S WATER USEAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES BICYCLE TIRES r e ,,. l:lr ~ · I j:llr) I' 1:=.·1( ... ( l"I i"'.11' ,, .. , !::i:.-· r:1 r·r. I I~. ., ( 1 .... 1::1( r;ic L'I( ·::·i .. -· 1,,1 .. :I •. ··i"-~· :·:! ... I. ; : i,_ .• .. , :;le , .. r·~I~ , ... j , ... 1\_.. 1· ' .'. "- :"1 ···! . '\..... ··.\ .... ·! ::·.I: I" 1:.·I 1: .. I: f'\ H •• 1 •• : I"·: 1::1· !·:· j 1 ... ~ !"L I ,.iv~ ~~·I :: ; I jAI 1 .. : II, .. ! J!: 1 .. , 1···1 h IJ l,J 1 .. :1 . I., ;..i i:.1 .. I .. :, 'J ·'! ···r I J F U~!O NO WARRl:NT 1'10. (J72860 fl 7 2 E6 l (17 2862' 1i72H6.3 07 286'1 u728E.5 (172b6b (. 7" Sf-7 U 7 2f.6E u 7 2 869 li7287C ll72871 ,,7 2 872 072873 07"874 (; 12 e.75 072e76 c.72877 fJ7nn~ 0 72879 072880 0128e.1 07 2 Bfi2 nn&3 G72884 (J"/2885 07~8P6 (..7~~P.7 f!"/2e8P 072889 07289C &72891 Ci7 2 8CJ~ 1;7 ~893 f,7cH9tt i 1 72f195 ,, 12 P.96 (1729<;7 C72P.9o r, ·12 H99 :J7 2 9(j (J •Hc401 u7:~9!J2 ·H2%~ C7 :?CJ(}q lj72c.us 91'::~ -Jl OJST WOflKJl\I(. CAl'IT/IL f-IHJC[S~ING DATE 1/.31/H~ J"l,G[ RlFO~T ~UHilER AP43 ~. CCJUNT'f ~A~JIT1'l IUN f))SlldCTS Of Of<HJCE cour11TY Vf NDOf! HURLEt fLlClHONICSt INC. Il\IGRAH l;.GPLR IN TE.RC hf M CORP. INTERNATIONAL TlfH~OLOGY SHE.LIA IVINS T11E JH!ITOR'S St1C1FP£' u.r. J[PSON DIV. t<.l.C. COf'.P/.NY K~ISER P(~MANENTf MED. Cf.NTlR KAISER ROLLHET KAMAN BEARINGS ~ SUPPLY l<AYNAR K I N G B E A H If~ G t I r~ C • , K rn L El< c 0 R p • L.B.w.s •• ltJC. LA PALf'.A INTER. HOSPITA( LAURSEN COLOR LAU LfRi'JF:R PHOTO, INC. LIFCCOH-SAFlTY SERVICE SUPPLY LIGHTING DJSTRJBUTO~S, INC. LlLLY TYP£SlTTJNG LOCAL AGfNCt FORMATION COMM MC!L INCUSTRIES MAJUR fNTEkPklSES A.C. MA~ION, TRUST[[ MARVAC fLECTRONICS MATERIAL HANDLING SUPPLY MATT -CHLCflt INC; MATTHEWS JNTE~NATIGNAL SCOTT MA'<IJ(Ll MCCOOK PUMP ~COONNlL DOUGLAS HCHASTfR-CARR SUFPLY CO. R.S. MfANS CO., ll"C• MEDJCAL CENTER OF G.G. ME~A CONSOLIOAlfD ~'TE~ M[SA H CHNOLOGY MIN[ SAFETY APPLJtNCES CO. ~IlCHELL INSTRUMt:NT CO. MONO GROUP' me. ~ORGAN (QUIPMENT CO. fo'r111sr.o, INC. NII.TEL l{ co. Ni.wfORT OUMS, JtliC:. NUMATIC [~blNEtRJNG OCCIDENTAL ·CHfMICH COGF. C LA 1 MS f·· A I 0 J 2 / II(., 18 t• AMOUNT 'i~l.6't iltD:l.67 :f.ltll7l.'•2 :t. '13 j. 20 :j.\ {-.• bl :1°167.SIU :I-l'it771.7ll $J:J7t9'll.(J(t i 6 • i)(, 2 • 2 :j $'t29.52 l92.63 11,:n1 •. H !tll t'f77.~5 :1-28. 89 .$221.71 U6t. ~2'J $22't.93 $64 o. 21 t2,23ij.63 $'f59.ll :t7il'f.9U :J.250~01J Utl'Jl.'15 $79.50 U5~ '11 $? 6. 't 5 :(. 55 5. l 0 $2t33't~b6 :1 .)U5 • .'>'1 "1-5 lo 'i(i :f.'15. 9lf $'ttl2U.71 s.n. :13 Hl j .!5.t- 111 !1'Jq. ':lJ U"1.h6 S.l')l.H=J iJ,]!ll.30 1.H't.:Ji: :1~4H.1;· 't'tj ll. ?l i 7'J 6. be l· l ' ~ ') 3 • 7 !;. 'I l t 'J f. 2 • 1 '~ '.j. ~ ') 1 • lnl ·t q 'Hfl l. :> IJ OtSCkIPTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYME.NT FREIGHT EMPLOYEE MILEAGE JANfTORIAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PW-083 (R) 5-19-Rl EMERGENCY REPAIRS U~~ CHAR~~ QV~~PAYME~T USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT BEA.RI NG SUPPL I ES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT PIPE SUPPLIES, BEARING SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT WE~Q!JHi SUPPLl~S USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT FILM PROCESSING USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT, FILM PROCESSING SAFETY SUPPL I ES ELECTRfCAL SUPP.LIES TYPESETTING ANN~iATION.#61 PROCESSING-~EE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT USE CHARGE OVERPAYM~NT ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SMAg HAR_DWARE PIPE SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT EMPLOYEES UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT PUMP PARTS . USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT TO()~~ TECHNICAL JOURNAL USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT WATER ·USEAGE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT SAFETY SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS SMALL HARDWARE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT COMPRESSOR PARTS CAUSTIC SODA (.' .. , .. ( ( I: r : " ( I"' HI! ··1,.·· I'. ~ ,, ;, : H. ., .. ( ! .. ; ; ... , !'.!. •.'I• ( l'.'.i 1:1(. ... I Jc ',.i -!,.JC '······1 .. "IC. ·"I j •• , ·'! ; .. ( l '.~i :~IC ::'.1 1"", • .·•I·-.~ :·.·: I .... ., ··1:.._. i" l·.11.... , .. 1 l:'i l,,;i..._. i,,1 1 EL •! !'"' ''j :j r! 1:::1 h.' " I :::II .. .. :l c (·1 ... :~ ... , I .'•1..r::- ( 1-.. ·1 ~ ... ( I (_ '· i ' r'I I ,hi ··1 "i i'J I. I I c ( fUNO NC' IJAHRMH rJO. t'7 29ll6 On9117 c.129uli J72C!09 r7!?C:.·1(1 1)72911 072512 C.72913 .r17?914 unn~ 07 ~9lb ~172517 l.17?918 072CJ19 0 7 292 0 i172q~1 :172922 n12q23 G72924 072925 07292b' 072927 07:?928 l.7"929 072930 ~,-, t-' 931 {17:? 932 'i.i 7~ c;i33 l'72G34 .:.1c.c;:s5 li72936 (l"/~'3:~1 r:7293lJ 172939 !l7 2<3'f ij J72941 n 12 942 {)72'143 [17294'f t;7~945 iJ7 29'•£:. :, -, ~· 'J4 7 ,·, ., :" <; 4 f! :.l72<J49 <..7(%C u7~G51 ( 'l l •1 ll -J I 0 J S l l~ C H t< I tJ G C f. t-I l A l Pk0Cf5SlNG C/ITf l/31/H5 fAGE in r-01n t.1u M1s Ul "'"'" :s ( ,, rnuNTY SANIT~TIUN DJSlPICfS Ot OHA~Gt COUNTY VfNDOH OLYMFIC CHEMICAL CO. ORANGE BLOSSOM ~EST•UHANl ORANG[ VflLVf & FITTING CO. OX't'G£f\! SCRVICf COUNT'f' OF ORANH CO. OF OkA~GE-AUDIT0P CONTPOLR CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MfOJCAL I~S COUNT'( SANITATION DISTRICTS OF PACIFIC MECHANICAL SYSTfMS PACl~IC si~LTY f~UIPMfN~ CL. Pt\CifIC B£LL F A ~J [ L -A I f< C 0 R P • PARAGON GUSINfSS SYST[MS PA~K(R HANNIFIN #2 PCNNlY SLEE~ER INN FtROXICATION SYSTEMS, INC. ~ICKYICK PA~ER PRODUCT~ PITNEY f.'OUES PLASTICS PROOUCTS CO. PO~ER SPECIALISTS, INC. ttAROLO Pl~ IMROSf ICE f•f(INTROl'JIX . -.. HIKE PhLICH & SONS 11ActPS f'IT ~luP Ttt [ ~ [GI s TEP ROB~INS t HEYE~S ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY PUIJCO ll\JflUSTP.IES-~ iNr •. RYAN-ll[RCO SFI CORPORATION U67 ST. JUDE HOSPITAL SAtH A /lNA OOOH S/\NTA ANA TOWERS CITY OF S(AL B[ACH SHAMHOCK SUPPLY SI G~JH FLASH CO. SMITH··LMERY CO. SOUTHEfllll C/lllf. [[ll SON CO. 50. CALIF. WATlk CO. ~OUTHE~N COUNTlf~ OIL CO. !:iTFPllEN CH~-MICAL CU. f. u I\ l; RA r' t c 0 r~ $ T t: u c r I (tu c 0 I• F • . lrtf SUF'l'l IrR::-: J. Wf.Yl':f S'tl V[ SH I< TA Yl OR -UUNN TIM[ CLOCK SAllS E SfRVJ(l CLAIMS fA IU 1)2/;)6/S\~) ORANGE COUNTY /I.MOUNT 't29t723.4~ '1.175.'tl 1-37·J~~2 1273.hO 13 tE.'f5.27 '153,830.fll) 1..ii,395.'7·2 :l'ft609.72 ~~,31?,?fi 'f.266. 11 :£790.09 1.'185~ /6 3.360.rJO 11,t'I02.lJ7 1.1 .~55.3'f 117 ~2f..'f .2f. $973.29 :£1 '! ! H2 :S.98.4'f i.n o. 61 -~~ g ! go ... $2' 55'1. 63 s.92 ,sa2 .55 t.1'35.6~ ·t875.03 1"4».57 $516.53 ··1q~~1)2 1·0')2. l 't !f.59.5.:\5 :£1,136.61 !·39.88 $l,83Eulf't "ii22.25 u.120.~iq \777.'15 115.3.50 $232,%7. 73 1>A.5't !.5tl6't.}1j :i-4 t 1H7 • .t.h '} 2 7 ' lJ 1) u • 11 ii -Ll,H8J.ll6 :t. t• lf '• •. ~ :1 t 2 l !I • -~ ~. '.i (, !) • l '· DESCRIPTION CHLORINE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT PIPE SUPPLIES DEMURRAGE, SPECIALTY GASES PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMS, TESTING 3-28-R, SURVEY 2-2~ COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES RETIRED EMPLOYEES MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM WORKERS' COMP. REIMBURSEMENT C9NTRACTOR J-llR SAFETY SUPPL I ES TELEMETER I NG USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT COMPUTER SERVICES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ____ . JANITORIAL SUPPLIES POSTAGE METER RENTAL USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT CONTROL EQUIPMENT INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE lJSE C~IARGE OVERPAVME.NT .... _. ····---····-··· ··-·-··-·· CONTRACTOR 3-28R ENGINE OIL LEGAL ADVERTISING PUMP PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES us E·--cHARc E·-ov E Ri>A 'ittENT PIPE SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ·usE CHARGE h~ERPAYMENT TRUCK PARTS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ~ATER USEAGE . SAFETY SUPPLIES, TOOLS CSDOC 61 I EMERG~NCY REPAIRS TESTING P2-26 POWER WATER USEAGE DIESEL, KEROSENE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT CONTRACTOR 2-2.lt TOOLS PETTY CASll RE I MOURSEHENT ELECTRIC CART PARTS TIME CLOCK REPAIRS r e }-- ::• J:k) i··· :{ LI: l:~ c· l"' 1·1 1. ·'''{ l·11·. l 'I '.~IC. :I ;."It. I':' J:1c I 1 .'IC I ... I ll ::ic '" II ;:·:,1c. ... 1,::,0 lit i''j 1:·':lc :1:.-., J~ ;'' !·:·IL 1 ... I·· i: :'. '- '' :..;( .. !'.:· ' \~. e,. i' ( I 1·1 '• I · ~ 1·.I ; ,, i" "I I "'I "I II I' ,., I l'"i ~ 11 I ! .. ' '" 1f J 1. ~ ii,:~ ~:~r;- ···I ~ 1 1::·1 I.'• !i1 l"l ''j 1: l"·I 111 j,.i I, !'i l"'I 1··; I ... I: ·I· ···. Ii f''• r:.:! - 1 •. · ! r· ~·! FUND NO ~lS~ -JT 01~1 WO~KING C4~11AL PkOCESSING OATE 1/31/85 PAGE Rf PORT NUM~ER AP43 !'. f OUN T Y S A N I U T I 0 N IJ I ST R I C T S 0 f 0 I< A llJ (, [ C (1 UN T Y IJAKF<ANT NO. OH952 IJ72953 (;JZ%4 ~7~955 0729!:11: iJ72q57 r11 :?CJ!lf1 C7~%9 (i129f,(j \)72961 c 72qf.? 072%3 C72%'t h72G6~; iJ729£.o ---Q72%7 072%8 Ci7~)Cl69 VU~OOR TRANS-AMERICA OELAV~L, INC. TRAVEL BUFF~ TllAVfL TRAVlL T~UCK ~AUTO SUPPLY, INC. TRUKSPECT UMA ENJNE[RING, INC. u.s. AUTO GLiss, INC. f IUdJK ULT J MO UNIOM SIGN CO. UNIT~D FA~CEL 5E~VICE UNITED STATES SAFE OfPOSil CO VlJR SCIUJTIFIC V~LLEY CJTl~S SU~fLY CO. \JAHLCO, INC. ~ESTERN MfOICAL CENTE~ IJC:S TI NGtfOUS£ flf CTR IC CORP - XEROX CORP. ?IP TEMPORARY PERSONNEL CL,IMS PAID J2/J6/~5 AMOUNT $l5't.lt3 115 h. :)fl '1.336.:10 :tl,7't'•·9iJ i1,25t.Ju '£3,529.Hfi t.5 &. H2 ~-2~d72.'t4 u,065.52 $36~% "$169.60 :£j,f,}}.'t6 ~l.B:33.~9 :!.llf.36 t263."19 $723.Ai :t.'t,918.25 S.3,639.iJ2 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 02/0b/85 :t.9»7,6~1).1)'+ SUMMARY #2 OPER FUND #2 F/R FUND #3 OPER FUND #3 ACO FUND #5 OPER FUND H5 ACO FUND #6 OPER FUND 117 OPER FUND 1/7 F/R FUND #I I OPER FUND #13 ACO FUND H5t6 OPER FUND #5&6 SUSPENSE FUND #6t7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED WORKERS 1 COMP. INSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 02/06/85 (. 11 ============:==== AMOUNT $ 2,250.85 2~,21t7!8~ 256.31 92,859.21 It, lt26. 61 lt. 41lt.89 ltO. 76 ~I 2 lt ~ • 51 I, 162. 68 19,387. IO 95. 15 I, 5lt5. 59 107,901.00 3,372.92 It 5 9 , 11 9 8 . 7 8 132,559.62 ii,609.72 no,737,116 $987,610.011 ( DESCRIPTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AIR FARE AIR FARE TRUCK PARTS DRIVER EXAMINATIONS ENGR. 5-26 TRUCK REPAIRS CONTRACTOR PW-129, PW-119, PW-121 7-~ SAFETY SIGN~ DELIVERY SERVICE DISC DRIVE CONTAINERS LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT U.~.E PIAIH~~. OVEBPJ\YHPH ___ . _____ _ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES XEROX REPRODUCTION TEMPORARY HELP ( ,--· e ,:r !"I I. ";. {-·I' ii 1·1 '''1 . ~ " I ( . ... I' I Ci(" •.I . ·, <c· ... 1 j··· j~:1c !I :·''• !JC .}c !''iG ·----·-·1,~1 . 1::1.·' 111 ,. I ~" : ; ~'I ;:\ .. , ----_____ J··1 I I) ::10· ,,, . . .. , ... ,,. "iL :···1 ~:1 ::::(., :iL :·'.! : 'L, i'.; ·\,_., \...... ( ( @; .''" ;•j rUNO NO 9199 -JT OJST ~OPKJNG ca~ITAL P~OCfSSIN~ DATE 2/Jq/fi~ PAGf RffO~T ~UMOER Apq3 { ··--· ,.- e 1 :.1, C~UHTY SANITAllON OISTHICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY :1r CLAJ~S PAJO 0212~/M~ t I I YARRANT 'NO. VENUOR AMOUNT 072909 AUC PAINT STRI~ING SERVICE tl,635.JG 072~90 ACACIA TERRACE tl25.R2 1)7?c;'H AIR-CALIFORf.JIA ·------H88.-Ju 07~992 Alk INOUSTRl(S COHP. ~177.l~ U725~3 ALLEN fLlCTHIC CO. $l,H9H.10 IJ72994 AM[RICAN SIGMA !27.u(J ~129g5 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY llt60 •• J5 b729~6 TH[ ANCHOR PACKING CO. it,136.65 ,. 1. on:c;97 ·-ANGEllCA-R£NH~L--SE~VI CES--GROUP --· !l.11)1}. 00 G7299B AQUA BEN CORP. $23,U7J.~5 ~", 072999 AiHNS INOUSTftlf.S INC. t-510.1}2 I '"~ 1173\ll\G ASTRO-jJAK Ul't.:.iO 1::1 !17.HOl ~C INDUSTRIAL SUPHY, INC. i5B.5\l Ii 073002 6KK CORPORATION S27t391.2tl i"f . ·-----073iHi3 --------·-BANGROH-LHl-1-lNEY--eo-.------------------------·--··-------·· .... $33 .62 ·- · 1"1 073uC:'t [i[ACON nAY (fJHRPRJSlSt INC. . $360.tlO ( ·' 073v05 fiERR'l'HAtJ K SHP11£N50N,JNC $13,100.59 ~.'~ oniJub ulrkLY & ASSOCIAT(S,··INC. "1-550~uo Cl :-: 07!.1)(17 DR(NNER-FIEOLER & l.SSOC., INC. 3.'121.50 I 0 t:x:J H3C08 [)UCKEVE GAS PRODUCTS U'J.13 ,,,, I L~ -~ --073,)(19-----------&U<;KS-eLO<:K-EHPOR-JUK----------------------------··· s.6ou. o~--~·-- ( 1,,1 :: (l73[J11) c.u.p.C.fl./ BILL HOORH(AO tlH.00 I 1 073ll11 C.t.LIF. AS!jOC. Of SAr~. AGENCIES '" ll73Ll2 ·CARMEN I TA FORD TRUCK· SALfSt ltJ ,,• I ( ,• !" 1,, ( H ( 1'.·.1 I·': ... (..··1 :,,; ·.'! " I .._ c i ... ~ ,· i,,, '·-I I i"i .. I • ... -1··"[' "' ... , H 1···! C_ 073013 CASE -SWAYNl CO. , INC. 07301'1 CtlEMICAL ENGTNEERifllG (; 7-~Gl S ----.. -------<;HE-VRO·N-USA-,-·I NG-.------·----· ~13Cl6 COMPRESSOR & INOUSTHIAL (73~17 CONSOLIDAT(O ELECTRICAL DIST. 0730ld CO~SOL1DATEG Rl~ROOUCTIONS ~73L1Y CONTINENTAL RAOJATOR i73~~0 COSTA M[SA AUTO PARTSt INC. J7 3i.·21 , · -~ • ( .--COUL·HR--CRANf-RE-~l/IL 073~12? COUNTY WllOLLSAL£ ElfCTk!C 073023 CAL WATER ~7JC?4 DAILY flLOT ~13a25 o~co ~7~02h DLLTA ANALYTIC~L DIV. 1i 7 ~(27 · G J GK-SONS------· - 117:.o,·12u .(lJf.ITAL (GlllJ-'MlNT COl<P. 073f;;>q OOtHiOO FNTI Hf'kJSE St INC. r, 7 J:~JiJ CJUMAS OJ £S£L I t;,J[CT I OM U7j~31 OU~N EDWARUS COR~. 073;32 OwYEH INSTRUMENT, l~C. 07Jf:33 EJMCO-P~OC£~S FwUil-l.--CO.-- H:~.d4 lA~lt"AN, INC. 1Hu.oc $-97" 17 S25t995.42 H9.00 ·-------------.·-·--------•"·-··t2 (i. 9't 1'tB:1.7!:> 1.3,551.09 :J.'t,S96.3& 112.ou $62 2. f.':J S'l2il.JU i1,~B3.q~ tl30.~0 :a.ll}7.'ll) :!0 26.46 3.!:l l • 0 l i1 ,;;4,..4q t7U.4lf t 7 ,6~4. ns 'J.'t t ,; 'l • 74 157;!.72 iq 5 •. :H. 118,0~9.~2 1ltl~'t.~7 ll[SCRJPTION PAINT STRIPING USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT A I R f ARE . --------- REFUND OVERPAYMENT CONTRACTOR PW-118 LAB SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ... TOWEL RENTAL. -.. ··---· CHEMICAL COAGULANTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TUBING CHAINS SLUDGE HAULING/DISPOSAL ----PlJBL I CAT ION -·· ------- CAR WASH COUPONS ENGINEERING 2-6-2 ·w.c. ADMINISTRATION COMPRESSOR PARTS BUTANE .... ------.. LEVEL .. RECORDER REP.Al Rs·--------- SEM f NAR REGISTRATION CONFERENCE REGISTRATION -·TRUCK PARTS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT PUBLICATIONS ;lr)1 I! ::1( ::1( ::1c /I I\ :;1c l~ ~IC ........... _ ............ /JI II 11 M''-·· JI II nl '--.. II :~1 ( .. II ....... ~-...... ,. --GAS 0 L' I NE ..... .. .. ------·---·-..... --···--· ---·-----..... ------------ti\ BEARING SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION TRUCK REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS CRANE RENTAL -. - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WATER SOFTENER RENTAL CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS ELECTRICAL REPAIRS PLANT #2 BASIN REPAIRS/LIDO PUMP RPRS ENGINE REPAIRS PAINT SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BEA·R I NG SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES ::1 (., .. .. ,,c " ~I 1,~1 ··-··· ..• --------,1~: ,_ " I.,, ... ,: ~­ : •. 1i ("'• rl 1::: ·,_ ·I I,., I .'"i j.,; ~ 111 .-I I 1·1 1:! :~II. ( I,, '" '''1 "I :I !JI " !•~ FUNLJ rm 9 1 ') 9 -J T {J l S l ~J 0 r~ K 1 N f, C A f 1 TA L l'll(lC[SSlt-JG DATE 2/l't/tH· f·'AGL ~rroRJ NUMAER AP~3 e ~· COUNTY SANITAllON UISTRICTS or OR~NGE COUNTY CLAIMS UAJO U2/2u/ti~ rir l ~ lMRF.f:NT NO. V[NIJOf.' J73035 JEFF ESDf R C73036 fAMILIAN PIP[ K SUPFLY i17 3 .J3 7 ---··F f.1)£-H A L--E .lC JlR[SS -CORP. ----· J73G38 FISCHER & PORTER CO. 073~39 C. M. fLOR£S RlNTALS 073~4~ FLOYO-~OROJCKt J.V. ~73041 FLUIO HANULING SYST£MS, INC. J73J't2 CLIFFORD A. FOPKEkT U ·131143 ------·----Hlf.--f-.(}.X bOR-0-COMP-ANY----··--··-___ ..... ··· 07~~4q FRUIT ~RO~[HS L~LO~~TO~Yt INC. L7304S CJTY OF FULLERTON 0 "/ 3 II 4 f, LA H. S • I r1 £ R G L A SS l N ST AL L ER S ~73t47 GE~ERAL TEL[PHONE CO. o73C.'tc Gl£RL1Ctt-MllCtt[LL1 INC. AM our..n tJlU.f!tl Ho1.n s.na.ou 1.11377.16 1lt1q3.uu 1.2 u, 79 n. '.>1> 1226.jU ta,77'3.tn :&B'#A. 1 b· :£30. OiJ s.22.01 :J.28i).CJU 11,n97.rn $2't.3dA6.00 (173f1't9· -.. ----HACH--COMllAf.J'Y-·--·--------· --· ... -·--·--·----.. ·· ·-·-----·--·------.. ~ 7 7 •. 4 7--- L~2 7 •. H· s2,n22.29 '-624.62 'H1632.8H !1.55.35 0"/31151J GEOHG[ T. llALL CO. 073U51 TEO A. HAHMf 11 G7J~~2 llANCOCK [ltlHACORltOREAL-· 07?~53 HARRINGTO~ INOUSlklAL PL/ISTJCS 673iH)'t MJCllA[L ut:.rnz ll EMPLOYEE Ml LEAGE 1,:.1( P I P E S UPP LI E S :: DEL I VERY SERVI CE -· ---.. ··--1·· PIPE SUPPLIES J( CS D 0 C H 2 MAN H 0 LE REP A I RS ,. CONTRACTOR PW-132 ]" PUMP PARTS l"'I ( ENGINEERING Pw-26 ~. 0£SCP IPT }(HJ ELECTRICAL-SUPPL I Es-· · 1n LAB AN AL Y S I S ;:I ( WATER USAGE .~ E L E C TR I CAL S UPP L I E S ,.., TE L E p H 0 N E I .'•·1 ( BUDD CHA IN SYSTEM li;~ -m ~ ~~ ~ m; fo~~ ;~ ~ ~~c _#_ l_I _ E~ ~ R G :--~:~ :--.---~IC USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT -u E NG I N E S UPP LI E S j "I C: EMPLOYEE MILEAGE a 1t 7 .!-,){', ~ -------------1-f-0--HO r: f MAN v1:i.t15b tlOLM[S TUrTLr DATSUN nnOf\7 ltOi'ffYWfLLt INC. {1 "/ .~ IJ t. B · CA I. [ f. • 11 0 VER Mt\ N u: I "l't~. c. 1··· :: '" ----·· ----· ---.. ---·-·-···--·----------$ 2-9 2 • 3 2 -- U 57. 01 :l.112.0ti .. ~(,,159,87 :t.402.93 :i.'+7.70 S.14.74 1115.~>2 $ 3, U1t 1 .111 $2·, 'i 79. 23 itt. 011 ··-...... __________ --s EM I NA R EXPENSES --·------·-·· ---· ·-----·------------ TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ·DEFERRED COMPENSATION DISTRIBUTION SHALL HARDWARE :1 c. '" " .1! ·'i ::1 ,., ·'' (. l"i ( '"' .. I :·.' 1·· l. IL u::1 ! :~1 \...,1"1 'I . j:1 rl "•· I; .• 'J7~u59 R.s. HU(;HlS co., INC. 073~b0 HUNDLEY CO,PANY1 INC. ll ·1 J.l:f,1 · .. --·---C J-1 V--O~ .. UUNT IN<· l-ON-Q[.p. CH-----.. --------- 073062 ISCO COMf A~Y CJ n !'ll:. 3 I M f' E: 1-l J /IL l.i £ ST C If l MI CAL C 0 • l.17 "! (,f.4 I l~GR AM PAii [R -. --..... u7~~b5 IRVINE RANCH YATER DISTRICT ~73~~h IRVl~E SWEEflNC SERVICE 117 3,16 7 --------TH~-JANI lllf( l.S--SHO~P-&--------·-··-· --··· .. - D7!G6~ G.[. JEPSON DIV. (;"/ 3 t· f. <j nn;~n :J "/ 3 U 71 lJ 7 :•.11 ·1,! ll7.H.73 n 1.'H1 '• f!7 !. ;17r_, ;;·1.~ .• J"/(. •173':'7'/ u1:rn1r. [; 7 J ~. 79 ll 7 .~a ti~· (. IJ • f' • J 011 N t I~ UL 1 NG JONrS Ctt[!1ICt.LSt INC. kAS SAfElY PRO~UCTS K[lHI e. ASSOCil•TES kltH; 11E'Al'1UG, rnc ..... KL r rN-LI N r c 0 IU' KNOJ JNnUSTHlhl SUPPLJ(S L.1;.~;.s., l~C. L[htolR 1'11010, INC. LE~CO [LfClklC CO. .... -.. L J CllJ J l~G 0 J !>Tf< lflUTOllS, -I NC. LILLY lYPCSfTTJNG tttso.au -~31)~. BO - Sl,b65.ll0 S3,2.H.\J6 H2 ,360 • 6l1 i.6 0. 85 1'lt200.(lll :£'• ,.aq 5. u4 in.11 1-Y II. 9~ ~237.£.11 i·.n. 1u , 3') '•. j [i s l :> 'J .. t. ') :f, l • 'I 'l •J • " i' ( PIPE SUPPLIES ----·-· .. ·--··--WATER US EAG E --·--··· .. -----·~-~-------·-·· -----~-· ··~·-··--- CONTROL EQUIPMENT FERRIC CHLORIDE OFFICE SUPPLIES/JANITOR SUPPLIES· \./ATER USAGE SWEEPING SERVICES ---· -·---JAN I T 0 R I AL SU PP l'I' ES·-·-- CONT RAC TOR PW-083(R) WOOD SHAVINGS CHLORINE SAFETY SUPPL I ES ENGINEERING 7-SHD-I BEARING SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPL I ES WELDING SUPPLIES FILM PROCESSING ELECTRIC CART PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TYPE SETT I NG ( ~, HI•, ___ . ·~ ::1 L:' .. •II •..._, •1 ~I\....-,, ~:1 \..• i'·'I \.._,' . -1·:.: l•l " I,' 1" ',: 1 .. I ( ,, ( ( " FU~O NO ~l'J'J • JT fllST WOl<KINC, CAnlAL Pr: 0 C C ~ S I N (, f1 A H 2 /1 4 I ht. 11 AG [ .! -r: ~LPOHT ~UM~[R AP~3 C fi UN T Y S Al-JI TA l I 0 N U I ST H I C r S 0 f 0 fl Ml C E C CllJ N 1 Y CL~IMS PAJU U2/2J/H~ WA~RPNT NO. ~ENDOH r.H OUN T Dt.SCHJPTJON 1173'.IH] l\.P. llNOSTl<OMt me. Hqt6E>6.f,q EIR CONSULTANT: OCEAN WAIVER n73~h2 LOS ANGfLES TIH[S i775.84 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING C173HIJ ~A~V~C ELE.lTROhlCS :!.12.35 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES n73~24 HCfiAJN INSTPUMfNTS $51L56.44 LAB SUPPLIES i•7:He!l KC~l.STrn-CA~R SUPl•LY co. "396.54 SHALL HARDWARE J73~e6 ~[NSCO, INC. il,619.l~ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ~7l~~7 MOBILE STRUCTU~[S t INC. iA,~26.0~ CONSTRU~TION TRAILER ~7JUHB MONlGO~ERY fLCVATOR COHP~Nl $328.qh PLANT 12 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE l17 3;;oc; -· MOHGAN-HiUIPIH.NT--CO.------------·· ······· ---· -\!13. 31 · TRUCK PARTS 073090 JERRY L. MORRI~, M.O. Sl75.00 MEDICAL EXAMINATION ;"i C.7~1191 NATIONAL CAS~' Rl"GISTEP U1606.2c~ OFFICE SUPPLIES j" 0 n (, r, 2 NE ~J A~ K ( L ( c T fl. 0 N I cs . u 3 6 • r1 ~ EL E c TR I c A L . s u pp L I E s ,. !°' 1173{153 Cl TV OF NEWPORT OEACH $l2.6C WATER USEAGE !"' li73l'·9'1 NU·W[ST FABtllCATION n,102.uo PLANT #1 BELT INSTALLATION 1 11 :· .. ·-. l 1 7 :Su%---·--... --····---OC<!·IrlE-U T·AL--GHfH l·G AL--GORP-.------·-·--·---------------u' 788. 6!! --· -----·--------····-·-··-cAUS TI c SODA .. -···-----·-----· --·--··------ .:, 0'731,% OCCJOENTAL COLLEG[-CAStH£R ~!:170.Gll OCEAN MONITORING SERVICES l"j OL'iil97 OLYMPIC CtiE.MICA.L co. S27t052.'H' CHLORINE '" liB\;~~ ORANG[ -COUNTY HkM SUPPLY-CO. . ........ · $117.% LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES-- .-. ••. C1 7 3 C 9 9 O 1.Y GEN SER V IC f ~ !i 8 8 • 0 3 WELD I NG SUPPL I ES '· 1 ... t;d U731J(i COUNTY SAIHTAllON OlSTIUCT :S3,003.~4 REIHB WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND .., __ l---073101------P.F-.-t-.-INS-l-RUHtN-T-C .. o-.------------------·$233-.20-·---------------.. ····-·TOOL··RENTAt-·-----------··---·---·--------·----- . "i ~ il1.3H2 P.W.A. PRINlING 3.6.S.60 PRINTING C. 1'1 1 '! u73lu3 PACIFIC H£CtiAfJICAL SYSTf.MS $580.50 CONTRACTOR J-llR I"' \17311'.t'+ flAc .. 1.a:Lo . -· .... -· ..... .. ...... <i219.lf2. . ...... WELDING SUPPLIES. . I'' (, ., 3 l O 5 p AR AG 0 ~ El us IN Es s s y s TE H s $ IH 2 • 5 0 H I N I c 0 Mp u TE R s E R v I c Es ( r·· ~~;~~~-~--··-·---::.;-~:.~-~o~~~wu; --·----------$~-~-~::~::: ___ ........... ---·---·----------~~:T~~~~~=T~~-26 !": f.73100 PERIPtlERAL MFG. t INC. t624.62 DISC PACK MAINTENANCE (. !'\ 073109 PICKIJICK ilAl'£R PRODUCTS :J.lt5.5H JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ", C7.5llli PLASTIC INDUSTldfS ·-· Si!7b.45 JANITORAL SUPPLIES "11 C'/3111 POSHlASlER s.2,ono.00 POSTAGE " r:73112 RAINUOW DISPOSAL CO. $j55.00 TRASH DISPOSAL "1 -· (17311 :S ·-··-· ·--.. ----··THE .. RE G·l S lER---------~-----····-· -....... · ··· ··· · -·--·-····· -$l 'tl76 • 32 ·CLASS If IE D ADVERTISING ,,, : j -------- ~17 311 lf R E Y N 0 L 0 S FR LN C ti & C 0. :£ 9 t 7 5 0 • U 0 E NG I NE PARTS 07311~ ~ICOH CORP Sl~2.lb COPIER RENTAL I . !".· u73llb ROUOHIS & MEYEl<S :l.22G.f>7 PUMP PARTS <•73111 ROBOZ SURGICAL lNSHUME.NT CO. 1.15'1.90 LAB SUPPLIES !". ~7~1lh RODOllSlERS • me. $5J.OO STEEL STOCK 1:", e -i:lr I, ;1!)1 4 :·:1;· " I) ::1r ::1( II ,.I•. 1• ..'!. ;~IC ~IC II u n.I ( n .•. l~I )I ~:1 c !.\I~ 1··~ (·73119 kOS£tAOUNT,-1NC.·------·--------S28.~2 FREIGHT : •• ' l 7 :si 2 IJ P Y C O ~ rn S TfUI H UJT S , 1 NC • ! l 1J 6 • 2 1 C ONT R 0 L E Q U I PM E NT (~.. ( I• ·n 1 2 l S & J CH [ V f.: 0 LL T t 1 q • ~>If TR U C K PART S : .. ( 1 3 l 2? ~ct I 0 LL r. c 0 • A 0 v rn 1 J s I N r. $l t "/2 ,", •. ~ ~. p P. E s s RE L E" s E p RE p AR AT I 0 N l" j·~IC. --f.1, J !··1 (. (17312.~ YVONNE SCliWJ.t3 i.32.hu EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 'j""I '..17~12'1 SCl[NTJFIC L:OUJP. PHODUCTS 1121.£•7 LAB SUPPLIES ..) oi:.Q lO t, 73 1 2 5 S (AC L T FF -EST AH S 1 1 ' 71 2 t 6 2 ti • 0 lt C 0 AS T TR UN K RE I H BURSE HE tH (i fl'/312f:. ~llAMRUCK ::iUl'fLY '.i.l di 7. U:. TOOLS H l"'i r··•. ~-· ~. ,, '···' ·•I PAY HE NT -D I ST • H · 1 1 . i· • l"'I i'.'.1 ',. I I :1 ~ -. 1·i 1:! I. L I• ' 1, ! .... , .. " ··1-· " I• /Ui ti ( II b:j F UNO NO 91Q9 -JT OISl ~ORKIN& C•~llAL ~/ARRANT NO. VE NOOR ~ROC[SSJNG OAT£ 2/14/85 PAGE RlFOHT NU~U[R AP~3 COUNTY S/.fl:IHTlON OISTRICTS Of (iflAtJG[ cour:TY Cl'° H\S PAJO 'i12/21t/All l\MOUNT OESCfHPTION C73127 SIMS lNOUST~IAL SUPPLY tH40.JC WELDING SUPPLl~S G73120 SHJTH PIPE & SUPPLY, INC t620.49 PIPE SUPPLIES Ct73l29 _ ....... souTH-COAST---OF-f-JC£. t:GUJP~f.NT :n,1•57.f,2 OFFICE FURNITURE r'73130 SOlJTtlC:l<N CALIF. EDI SON CO. :i9ll,'t'f8.93 POWER ~73131 SO. CAL. GAS CG. tl2t725.0~ NATURAL GAS 1173132 SOUTl1EiHJ COUNTIES OIL co. :no,u.H.02 DIESEL FUEL n73133 SCOTT STEVENS S43.~5 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ~73134 SUF£R ChEH CORP SUOl.36 SOLVENTS G7.H35 ----· -· -----TllL>SUPPL-1-FRS·------------·-···--·· · ······ ··· ·· ·-------·Ut709.H2 TOOLS -.... -·· 4 G73136 J. WAYNE SYLVESTER s1,ua2.22 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ~73137 TAK TAKAMINf Sl,960.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE ~7313tt TAROY [NGJN[[RlNG · $1,970.79 PUMP PARTS e .r l'.Jr I -~. II~ I .. · I. . I' i'",, 1" ·I! i"I " ... ~ .. .,.( II II '" "· /I i1 7 3 l 3 9 Ttl 0 MPS 0 I'll L AC G lJ ER C 0 • $ lt 19 1 • 5 2 PA I NT SU P'P L I ES 1:•1 ( 073Jl!U CllANNON C. TIA f.21.53 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE " · 0-7 3141-----·----~-TONY-1 S--lOCl<-&---UF-£---Sf.JPJ-J.C~----·---·------·--··-------$69. 62-·-· --·-......... ··· ..... LOCKS ANO KEYS··--------······---·-···---·-·----------1 ' r, C73l't2 TRAFFIC CONTROL SE"VlCEt INC. $307.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES ~73143 TRANSAMERICA OELAV~Lt INC. S2t433.17 ENGINE PARTS ~IC. ~-.73144 Tf<UCK ~ AUTO surPL'it .INC. ---:i.3llH.2't ·TRUCK PARTS }/ l·7314~ TURBOCHARGER, INC. $21857.70 ENGINE REPAIRS 0731% 23Ttl CfNTURY PLASTICS, INr. S.281.tH OFFICE SUPPLIES ~IC I Cl ::: :• ·-f-·-.... J~ 07 3147---------UN ION·-01-l-GO·.-OF--·CA L-lF--.--------~-------···--···--··----·----·-·:f.-76.-'56 -·-----.···-···-··--·---·---· .. ·--·--·GA SOL I NE----· ---·----·-·---------.. ··---------------·---........ ------i ~73148 UNllEO PARCEL SERVICE iu3.90 · DELIVERY SERVICE '~u ~ I ~ ~: j I .. 1 ''ll .:· .. •U I 14.' I; i ~ '. I 1. ·1 1:~i l ~I I ;.;! ... , ··"t -·'I "' 1 :::1 "'I r:· ~73l't9 UNJlEO STATES £QUIP. Co., IMC. tS55.20 COMPRESSOR PARTS :17:H~o UNlll:D STAffS-111-'l & fOUNOHY -· UO,d6't.3& ·· ·5-19-Rl-A ·PIPING··· r73151 VWk SCIENTIFIC t3,3•4.54 LAB SUPPLIES 073152 VALLARTA RESTAURANTS t INC. S.2tt5.~3 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT 07ll53·---···-VALLEY---CIT-IES·-SlJilJ:!L\~--CO.----------····-· ·----·--·--n,u10.10 .. -·--······---··-··PIPE SUPPLIES··-------------- r73154 VALVE K STfEL SUPPLY CO. tlt422.H6 VALVES (731~5 VARIAN lNSTRUHlNT GkOUP 'noo.oo CONFERENCE REGISTRATION (:73156 VAUC>llANtS lNOUSTUIAL--REP--AJft CO i2~U.OO ENGINE REPAIRS C73157 LAHRY ~ALKER ASSOCIATES, JNC. 13,77~.10 ENGINEERING P2-23-6 073158 JOHN R. UAPLlS $377.26 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT C,73159···-···---.... -.. 1.IAUK[$11A---~NGJN[:--s£J<.VlCfNTf-R-· -·-·--·-······-------···---· ·-········ $57f;l.03 ···· ENGINE ·PARTS·--···--··----- ,l"/ :~ 16 r1 IJ C S T 1 N G 110 U Sf l L E.C TR J C C 0 RP :f.l •n • 4 5 EL E C TR I CAL S UP P L I E S ~73161 WILLARD MARKING 0£VJCfS i3't.5f OFFICE SUPPLIES 073lt2 ROURKE & IJOOORUff $l3,U57.00 LEGAL SERVICES C73163 ZIP TEMPORA~Y PERSONNEL $lt471.J2 TEMPORARY HELP lOTAL CLAIHS ~Al~ r~/~U/H5 S.2, 4'Jl ,2crn. l 7 ==========~====== (, ( :1c ,II i::i (_ ::1c ~~I l ~I -· ........... ---.. ·--···---···-----1~) ... ~-1 \... ~I"· i" i::, ,~ -r:_·::,. I I_ ' : ' ~ • I 1 ·i I !· I ( ( ~'. ... ( l,. FUND NO 9199 -JT Dl~T WOR~I~~ CAPITA~ {I: · 1' I·. ! '" I: ... , ',.I SUMMARY # 1 OPER FUND #I ACO FUND #2 OPER FUND #2 ACO FUND #2 F/R FUND #3 OPER FUND !": #3 ACO FUND J •-:_ . --U 5 OP ER f u ti D. ,.l H 5 AC 0 FUN D !"I #6 OPER FUND u 16 ACO FUND i'"I #7 0°PER FUND I .... U7 AC 0 F U N D .., __ NLF/R.FUNP. '' H 11 OPER FUND 1" H I I AC 0 F ll N D ,,, . . II ! l f I R F u NP ( ~ 15&6 OPER FUND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ~~AIM~ PA!Q ~?l~0/85 AMOUNT 13. 94 855.70 5,036.27 15,098.67 3,282.83 8 I 143 • 31 5,301.53 .. .. PROCESSING DATE 2/14/85 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP~3 ( ··--···--·-----------·--·· -······----------------1 .. ·-· ---·······-~ 0 11.-. ~k) I 1111 ( ... II ::1.~- ::1c :~1 c I~ ::1 ("" II • I~ ~IC II jJ Hie· I' • •''·1t;'3 #5&6 ACO FUND '' _ l --·-· J T.. OH Lf UNIL ,. U1 CORF "'j :.: S E l F FUN 0 ED W 0 R KER S ' C 0 MP . I NS UR AN C E "'j JT WORKING CAP!T!\b rnrrn .... _____ _ FUND 12,82~).58 4,073.81 28. 71 5,540.02 5,306.63 216. 77 ... 0,~s.2.so 6,597.35 338. 71 ! .?~?,628.00 l,682.60 6, Olt 1. 1 O 258 158.72 -~-~~rm:n-~------------------~~------. ____ .... 1~1 (; l"i .... , 1·1 1''1 1··· ,.,. Ill I/ ··I .. 1 1·': 1··1 r·i ',.I! j 1... !"'! -i::: , ... . c~ .. TOTAL CLAlttS .PAID_Q2.L2Jll.85 ------·------------··--------H I 4 HI ~, 0 .• .1 7 II :~IC ., :;1c ~~I \... ~:10 ·.~ ··~1 I .. , l ' ... I (. . .... .. .... ti' ... i'"' , .. , '.-1 • ...... ;:.: 1:·;1,v r··; :"I 1·1 - - - - - - .... - - - - - - - - - - - Draft Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report March 1985 I•• S Alll T A A NA .ll lY(lt 01 S TJtlCT l Executive Summary SI" M('Wl'IO I'( • #tL.lC(N T U OUHUCT Z 4 2 " (UCLID • OISTIUC T 2 14° SU N fl.O'W (lt ·Ot STJUCTS 1•1 7 1" OtY ("S IO N COlitM (CTIO. JC" (llll AV( f O,.C( WAIN ,.. o.on I N T(ltC(l'T°" OIS f ltl(TS l a 11 5<4° W.AG N OL I A · IVS HAltO INHltC CP'TO IU ••" SAN T A AM A OISTIUC T I l ~" 4 /ltl AS( T lt UN tC t>U T 1t1 CT C PLANT 1 DISTIU CTS t a l ----.,,.,d---L...------------------ ::~;~~~~~~~O L D~(~· ---..:l..------------------------' OIS TIU CT S l a ll PREPAR E D F O R 1 4 °CO A3T TIUJtUC S(W(ll!: 01 S TJt1 CT II PR E PARED B Y ... i I w J I bJ J : I LI J I J J J J u l ' i ~ . I ..l ' w \. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report March, 1985 ... .. .. - - PREFACE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY JOINT TREATMENT WORKS WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (MARCH, 1985) This Executive Summary and background information addresses proposed improvements to be made to the two regional wastewater treatment plants owned and operated by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC). This summary document capsulizes some of the major findings of a Draft Environmental Impact Report addressing the facilities proposed in the 1983 CSDOC Master Plan for Joint Works Treatment and Disposal Facilities and post-Master Plan improvements which have been proposed as a result of special studies • These improvements include a new headworks, new primary treatment capacity, new sludge digestion facilities, a new outfall booster pump station, and many general operational improvement projects including major expenditures for odor control, air pollution control, and energy conservation facilities. Total cost for these projects is estimated to be $112.7 million. Of the total expenditures proposed some $33.6 million are to be spent on projects to provide for mitigation of existing environmental concerns such as odor, air pollutant emissions, volatile organic gases and energy and chemical use. The summary is divided into two parts, an Executive Summary section for those desiring to read an overview of the proposed projects and their impacts and measures to mitigate these impacts, and Background Information containing an explanation of the need for and description of the proposed improvements as well as an overview of the Districts, their history, planning process, and f ac i1 i t i es • -1- .. .. ... ... EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) have provided wastewater collection, treatment, amd disposal services for northwestern Orange County for over 30 years. CSDOC is made up of eight separate sanitation districts which serve all or part of 23 cities (Figure 1). Each District is governed by a Board of Directors of elected officials representing the cities or s~nitary districts within the District and a member of the Board of Supervisors • The Districts service area includes 353 square miles of highly developed land, containing about 85 percent of the County's population of about 2.1 million persons. The service area's populat~on of nearly 1.8 million persons has grown from 200,000 since the inception of CSOOC and wastewater flows have increased from about 30 million gallons per day (MGO) to approximately 230 MGO. csooc•s wastewater treatment facilities constitute the.third largest wastewater treatment system on the Pacific Coast. The facilities include approximately 600 miles of major interceptor sewers, 200 miles of subtrunks, 33 pump stations and two large treatment plants collectively referred to as the Joint Works Facilities. The facilities consist of Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley, Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach, and various interplant facilities to transfer flows from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 and an ocean outfall effluent disposal system. These facilities, illustrated in Figure 2, are operated, maintained and administered by a staff of over 300 persons • Only municipal, commercial, and industrial wastewaters enter this system, with each District providing the required trunk sewers for individual drainage areas • -2- ~ MILES .. RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 ~~ ....... """'"" 9ANIT A TION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA , ... LOS ANGELES CO • FOUNTAIN VALLEY - PACIFIC OCEAN TREATMENT PLANT N0.2 HUNTINGTON BEACH OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA , 1985 FIGURE 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I I l I l ( I I I l l I I ( ( I I l I ~ --~~-.... ............... --_ .... , ........ -.. ................ .-.-..................... -.. .......... _ 11 • NEWHOPE-Pt..ACEHTIA DISTRICT 2 ~2· EUCLID-DISTRICT 2 ---- 94• SUNFLOWER------- Ol8TRICT8 ti 1 79• DIVERSION CONNECTION oe• KNOTT INTERCEPTOR DISTRICTS S& 11- 94• SANTA ANA RIVER-DISTRICT 2 ---49• SANTA ANA-DISTRICT t 39• AIRBASE TRUNK- DISTRICT 8 .. ·o 8 00. Plant No. 1 Q o ea• INTERPLANT INTERCEPTOR 54. MAGNOLIA-BUSHARD INTERCEPTOR OISTRICTS 2&3 ·re• MILLER-HOLDER INTERCEPTOR -DISTRICTS S&1 1 94• COAST TRUNK SEWER DISTRICT t t plant No. 2 CSDOC JOINT TREATMENT WORKS SCHEMATIC. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY NO SCALE FIGURE 2 ... .. ... Local jurisdictions (cities and sanitary districts) are still responsible for providing collector sewer systems for individual parcels which then connect to the CSDOC system. The Orange County Flood Control District owns and operates a separate extensive local storm draim system, not connected to the CSDOC sewer system, designed to accommodate surface and storm runoff and eliminate inflow into the sewer. This Master Plan DEIR evaluates in a general manner the impacts associated with providing treatment facilities necessary to serve anticipated regional needs for a 20 year period. However, specific projects to meet projected wastewater needs are constructed to meet needs on a five-year incremental basis. Some facilities, such as the proposed Headworks at Plant No. 1 and Outfall Booster Station at Plant No. 2, are designed and initially constructed to serve long-term needs on a scale of 20-40 years, but pumps and other equipment are added only as needed. As the need for treatment facilities to meet both capacity and level-of-treatment demands is experienced, the Districts will respond through an on-going construction program. The two regional treatment plants have an existing nominal design capacity to treat 220 million gallons per day (MGD) (with 12 MGD of standby capacity at Plant No. 2) of flow to a level adequate to meet applicable State and Federal discharge limitations. The total treatment capacity of 232 MGD (which includes all available 12 MGD of standby capacity) is now fully utilized to treat existing flows. Additional treatment capacity proposed includes the addition of 24 MGD of primary treatment facilities at Plant No. 1 to accommodate flows expected by the year 1988 • -3- Need for Proposed Joint Works Facilities Improvements The Joint Treatment Works presently have a combined nominal rated design treatment capacity of 232 MGD. There is currently no standby capacity as the Districts are using all capacity to handle current flows. It is desirable to have 12 MGD standby capacity at Plant No. 1 and 24 MGD at Plant No. 2 to use when facilities are down for repair. In the 1983-84 fiscal year the CSDOC treated an average of 230 MGD of wastewater. This average represents an increase of approximately five percent over the average daily flow (ADF) of 221 .. MGD in 1981-82 and 25 percent over the ADF of 185 MGD in 1977-1978. The ... increase is a result of an increasing population within the CSDOC area, an increase in per capita flows, and wastewater flows from the Upper Santa Ana River Watershed (SAWPA) which began in 1982 and now average about 2.67 MGD. The Santa Ana River Interceptor was constructed in 1972 to provide for management of upper basin brines which were contaminating Orange County's groundwater. Water and air pollution regulatory agencies specify that all wastewater facilities must be designed to meet the needs of all normal anticipated growth with a reasonable reserve capacity. Facilities are designed in accordance with the latest population projections of the Southern California Association of Governments CSCAG), stipulating that population projections must be consistent with forecasts used in the Areawide Air Quality Maintenance Plan and the Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan (Section 208) developed under mandates of the Federal Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act. Immediate improvements are needed to provide additional treatment and hydraulic capacity to accommodate the service area's growing population. In -4- 1983, it was estimated that in 1987-88, the total projected average flow rate at the CSDOC plants was expected to increase 16 percent {270 MGD) and by 2002-3, the flow rate is expected to increase by 33 percent {307 MGD). To date, the Districts have successfully met their current discharge requirements with the existing facilities by operating efficiencies in excess of rated capacity. This has been the result of superior operation and maintenance, decreased sewage strength, encroachment into standby capacity and a general lack of intense storms. The major exception was the 100 year storm event in March of 1983 which overtaxed the existing system's capabilities resulting in the overflow of untreated sewage in local streets, due to a lack of influent pumping capacity to handle the 400-plus MGD of storm flow. As flows increase and discharge requirements become more stringent, however, it will become progressively more difficult to meet discharge requirements without additional Joint Works treatment improvements, both in capacity and level of treatment. Description of Proposed Improvements The following sections describe the proposed improvements to the two treatment plants recommended in the 1983 Master Plan as well as post-Master Plan improvements and recommended odor control facilities and cogeneration*** facilities, as a result of special studies ordered by the Board of Directors. ***Cogeneration is the process of generating·electricity and recovering heat from a combination of engines and generators with optimzed waste heat recovery. The proposed power stations will burn existing surplus digester gas in new engines equipped with the best available air pollution control equipment. The two proposed projects will greatly reduce the need to depend upon purchased power from the Southern California Edison Company while reducing overall air pollutant emissions. This will result from substitution of electric motors for internal combustion engines used to drive pumps, blower and other equipment. -5- .. ... .. Reclamation Plant No. 1 Proposed 1983 Master Plan Improvements Average daily flow rates reaching Reclamation Plant No. 1 are expected to increase by as much as 24 MGD by 1987-88. A new Plant No. 1 headworks, and additional primary clarification and digestion capacity will be required to accommodate these projected flows. A new 100 MGD (average flow) headworks has been proposed with an initial pumping capacity of 80 MGD (peak pumping capacity to handle storm flows is proposed to total 200 MGD by the year 2002). Initially, the new headworks would feed the additional 24 MGD (average flow) of primary clarification capacity and two new 110-foot diameter digesters that would be added. The location, estimated costs, and appearance of these proposed improvements are depicted in Figure 3 • Treatment Plant No. 2 Proposed Improvements Treatment Plant No. 2 has now reached its planned capacity of 174 MGD (allowing for an additional 24 MGD of standby capacity) for primary treatment and 75 MGD for secondary treatment. Addition of the following facilities is still needed to provide improvements for hydraulic reliability and environmental mitigation: replacement of two pumps in headworks C and construction of a new 600 MGD outfall booster pump station to serve both plants. Figure 4 shows the location, estimated costs and appearance of these facilities proposed in the 1983 Master Plan. Post Master Plan Improvements at Joint Works Facilities Subsequent to completion of the Master Plan, the Districts have authorized two major studies of the Joint Works facilities which recommended major improvements and projects to mitigate existing environmental concerns . -6- ... The first of these was an odor evaluation study by a firm with expertise in odor control. This study, completed in November of 1984, recommended several odor control projects at both treatment plants. Included were covers for odor collection and scrubbing on primary clarifiers at Plant No. 1, Plant No. 2, plus other odor control facilities. In December, 1984, the Districts' Boards of Directors authorized implementation of the complete odor control program recommended with full covering of existing primary clarifiers at both plants. In addition, they approved a policy to control odors from existing facilities through an aggressive retrofitting program and inclusion of odor mitigation measures in all future facilities. The facilities approved are addressed in the DEIR and depicted in Figures 3 and 4. Another study of major importance is a Digester Gas Utilization Study which was done to evaluate various means of optimizing the use of CSDOC-generated digester gas while at the same time complying with new more stringent air pollution control regulations for controlling sulfur and oxide of nitrogen emissions. Major retrofitting of existing engines and advanced technology on new engines is required to meet these regulations. Cogeneration will provide a centralized means of generating electrical power from digester gas, improved and more efficient use of waste heat from engines, and a more effective, less costly means of complying with air pollution control regulations. As recommended, cogeneration facilities will allow the use of electric motors for the new headworks at Plant No. 1 and outfall booster station at Plant No. 2. Also, greater use of existing electric motors and less dependence on existing digester gas-fueled -7- internal combustion engines can be achieved with substantial cost savings and overall reductions in air pollutant emissions. Details on the cogeneration facilities and consideration of their construction will soon be evaluated by the Districts' Boards of Directors. The cogeneration facilities are being addressed in this DEIR to expedite their completion since they are a major environmental mitigation project. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures A detailed evaluation of the environmental impacts associated with the proposed improvements at the two treatment plants is contained in Chapter IV of the DEIR and summarized herein in Table 1. To the extent possible, impacts have been quantified where sufficient information exists to do so. Of particular concern has been the use of energy, the generation of air pollutant emissions in .. the form of malodorous gases and gases from internal combustion engines used to drive pumps and other equipment, and the use of chemicals for odor control and wastewater solids conditioning. The major concerns relate to the need to control odors, reduce air pollutant emissions, and reduce the usage and costs of energy and chemicals. Maintaining effluent quality within prescribed limitations and preventing the overflow of untreated sewage to local streets and/or effluent to the Santa Ana River is another very important consideration. ... ... .. Short-Term Construction Impacts Construction of the proposed facilities will generate short-term construction-related impacts which to a large extent can be mitigated. Construction of various facilities has been underway at Plant No. 2 on -8- .. ... almost a continuous basis for the past six years without any adverse impacts on the neighboring residential community except for the occasional presence of odors (created by operational conditions which often can be impaired during certain critical periods when tie-ins are made between old and new facilities). No new facilities have been constructed at Plant No. 1 in over 10 years and the new major facilities proposed are not expected to cause any significant impacts if appropriate mitigation measures are employed to reduce traffic, congestion or interferences, noise, and air pollutant emissions (particularly dust). Long-Term Operational Impacts Operation of the improved facilities will result in a net reduction in impacts of concern to local residents. Odors, air pollutant emissions, chemical use and energy consumption will be reduced by the proposed improvements. The most significant improvement will be the implementation of odor control through the covering of existing primary clarifiers and other facilities and the collection and treatment of malodorous air streams. This will also capture organic gases that may be released during the treatment process. Covering will also reduce the need for extensive prechlorination, thus reducing chlorine usage. Energy use at both plants will be reduced through the construction of two cogeneration facilities to optimize the use of digester gas generated during the digestion of captured sludges from the treatment processes. This will reduce air pollutant emissions also, since older engines will gradually be phased out or replaced with electric motors and the new cogeneration engines will be equipped with the latest air pollution control equipment. -9- Secondary Growth-Related Indirect Impacts Growth-related impacts associated with the Districts' accommodation of planned urban growth of the member cities and the County areas which are served by the CSDOC facil·ities are beyond the control of CSDOC to mitigate. However, these impacts are addressed on a case-by-case basis during the development of General Plans of the cities and County and other local planning efforts or by regional agencies during the development of the Water Quality Control Plan or Air Quality Maintenance Plan. Such impacts are of concern on a regional basis, since air quality standards are not now achieved and traffic congestion is getting worse. A general discussion of these impacts, the types of utilization measures which can be employed and the agencies responsible for their implementation is included in the DEIR in Chapter v. A summary of the various agencies influencing the proposed project and having general authority to help mitigate some of the growth-related impacts are listed in Table 2. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures A summary of the construction-related and post construction operational impacts associated with the proposed projects (the primary or direct project impacts) are shown in Table 1. Also included in Table 1 are the indirect or secondary growth-related projects which are associated with the growth of the CSDOC service area. These impacts are not within the scope of mitigation of CSDOC which is a single-purpose agency providing wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal facilities and serves to accommodate the planned urban growth of its members. -10- l I I I l I I l I l I ( I [ l l I I c Table 1 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES* Area of Concern/ Impact Status Impacts Mitigation Measures Geology/Soils/ Seismicity Mitigable Mitigable Mitigable Water Resources Mitigable PRIMARY: Construction The existing soil profile at Plant #1 would be destroyed to a depth of up to 15 feet to construct the facilities. Foundations and structures would be built to withstand a maximum expected earthquake The Plant 12 site will be excavated to a depth of up to 15 feet to construct the proposed facilities. The excavation will alter the existing remaining soil profile to a depth already modified by sludge drying operations PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) A major earthquake along the Newport- Inglewood Fault Zone could damage proposed facilities resulting in the release of untreated sewage into the streets. The hazard is greatest at Plant #2 with liquefaction a potential concern at Plant il PRIMARY: Construction (Both Plants) Construction may require site dewatering for deep foundations or excavation work Soil and geological studies will be conducted to evaluate foundation resistance During construction, soil subject to wind blowing will be watered to minimize dust Soil and geological studies will be conducted to evaluate foundation resistance During construction, soil· subject to wind blowing will be watered to minimize dust Rubber gasketed mechanical joints will be used to connect pipes to treatment faci- lities to minimize ruptures during earthquakes. All facilities are and will be designed to earthquake st'andards. Desanding of water and water disposal in accordance with EPA and RWQCB NPDES Permit guidelines *For a description of definitions and terms used in this summary see the end of this table l I I I I I l l l l l l l I l l I l l l ·Area of-Concern/ Impact Status Impacts Mitigation Measures Positive Impact Mitigable Air Quality and Microclimate Mitigable Positive Impact PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) An increase in the ability to handle existing peak and hydraulic flows will result from the project, thereby resulting in a beneficial impact of preventing overflows of raw waste- water. No adverse impacts on water quality are expected SECONDARY Future water demands are anticipated to exceed the developable supply resulting in higher water costs PRIMARY: Construction Dust emissions at Plant il are estimated to be as high as 110 lb/day per acre over a 21 ~onth period for a two acre maximum area. Dust should not pose a nuisance to residential areas of Costa Mesa and Fountain Valley if mitigation measures are implemented PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) A net benefit in terms of existing air quality should occur. Odors, largely in the form of hydrogen sulfide, are estimated to be reduced from over 280 pounds per day to less than 3 pounds per day through construction of covers and scrubbers on existing facilities. An increase in prechlorination capacity and digester gas clean-up projects will further reduce odors and SO and NO emissions x x No mitigation measures· are required Provide additional imported water supplies. Continue to implement wastewater conserva- tion and reclamation projects. During construction, watering should occur on a daily basis as needed for dust suppression. Use of well tuned and properly maintained equipment can reduce gaseous pollutant emissions. Discontinuing con- struction during second stage smog alerts will also reduce air pollution problems on poor air quality days Implementation of cogeneration facilities*** will reduce air pollutant emissions. Retrofitting of existing internal combust- ion engines with approved air pollution control equipment (i.e., selective dilution) for meeting required reductions for NO and co. Addition of ferrous chlori~e to digesters will reduce SO x emissions ( I I I Area of Concern/ Impact Status I Unavoidable Adverse Impact Biotic Resources No Impact l I l I I I Impacts Estimated emissions from engines installed in the new booster station and. headworks are expected to be lower than the emissions from the existing engines which will be abandoned. No , so2 and hydrocarbons will decrease a~d CO may increase or decrease depending on the engine ultimately selected for co-generation facilities. SECONDARY Continued population growth in Orange County will increase air pollution emissions associated with transporta- tion, fuel combustion, and industrial production. Districts provide facilities to accommodate urban growth planned and approved by cities and the County. PRIMARY: Construction A few existing trees originally planted by the District will have to be removed at Plant il. Portions of the plant site are suitable urban wildlife habitat and will remain as such following construct- ion if landscaping is reintroduced No impacts on biotic resources will occur as a result of construction activities at Plant 12. I I [ l ( I l Mitigation Measures **Emissions control measures include vapor recovery and reduction in volatility; motor vehicle inspection and maintenance programs; extended warranty on new cars: additional emission controls on motor vehicles; and home utility engine replacement No mitigation measures are required but landscaping around plant perimeters and interior is recommended I I I l I l l I I I I l I I ( l ( l I Area of Concern/ Impact Status Impacts Mi_tigation Measures Positive Impact/ Mitigable Unavoidable Adverse Impact Cultural and PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) Seagulls and crows which feed on food floating in primary clarif iers will be displaced once covers are placed on clarifiers. This will reduce potential transmission of pathogens. Existing trees and landscaping which will be removed will reduce potential wildlife habitat for some birds. Marine dis- posal of effluent is not expected to adversely affect biota SECONDARY Continued development will reduce agricultural land, open space, and wildlife habitat. Fish and other riparian fauna will be affected by water resources development projects Scientific Resources PRIMARY: Construction (Both Plants) No Impact Archeological surveys have concluded that there are no known cultural or scientific artifacts at either site. Thus, construction impacts at the two sites will have no impact on any known cultural, scientific or historical resources, 1. Means of providing improved wildlife habitat should be evaluated 2. Industrial and non-industrial source control programs should continue to be enforced. 3. Continue to maintain effluent quality to meet NPDES Permit limitations and conduct $1.5 million annual marine monitoring program 4. Research on improved wastewater disposal practices should continue **Promote preservation of wildlife habitat, open space, and agricultural land; encourage higher density (less space con- sumptive) development; preserve endangered species habitats No additional site survey work is needed to identify cultural artifacts. However, if something of potential scientific, cultural or historic interest is discovered during construction, an expert should be called in to investigate and work stopped in the immediate area I I I l I l I I I I I I I I ( l I I I Area of Concern/ Impact Status Impacts _ Mitigation Measures No Impact Mitigable Land Use Unavoidable Adverse Impact PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) No i~pacts will occur SECONDARY Continued urbanization threatens to destroy significant historic and cultural landmarks. PRIMARY: Construction The proposed Plant #1 facilities will encompass less than two acres. About 41 acres will remain available for future construction. The proposed Plant #2 facilities will encompass one acre of land. Sufficient land will remain available for con- struction of future treatment facilities if needed. PRIMARY: Operational A new digester cleaning area at Plant #2 may be needed resulting in an additional use of one to two acres of fallow, disced land No impacts will occur at Plant fl SECONDARY Depending on the actual rate of growth in Orange County, remaining agricultural land could continue to be developed at the rate of 150 acres per year. Other land will be developed as General Plans are implemented. No mitigation measures are required **Continue inventory and mapping programs to identify cultural resources; support historic preservaeion efforts. Support archeological, paleontological and scientific research for important sites in Orange County. No mitigation measures are necessary No mitigation measures are necessary No mitigation measures are required No mitigation measures are required **Preserve agricultural land; carefully plan shoreline development, development near water courses· and floodplains, and pro- tect scenic and wildlife areas ( I I l I l l l ( I l l I l ( l I l l Area of Concern/ Impact Status Impacts Mitigation Measures Visual/Scenic Qualities Unavoidable Adverse Impact No Impact Unavoidable Adverse Impact Unavoidable Adverse Impact Public Service and Utilities No Impact Mitigable PRIMARY: Construction (Both Plants) Cranes will be visible during construction. PRIMARY: Operational The proposed facilities at Plant #1 will have an appearance similar to existing plant structures and will be built in the interior portion of the site. The outfall surge tower at Plant #2 will be raised to a height of 85 feet and will be highly visible. The out- fall booster station will be visible from Route 1 and the Costa Mesa Bluffs area. SECONDARY Scenic views tend to decrease with continued urban growth. PRIMARY: Construction (Both Plants) No significant impacts expected during construction of the proposed facilities. PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) Energy use will increase substantially unless cogeneration projects are constructed. No mitigation measures are required. Efforts to visually enhance the plant sites should continue in the form of perimeter berms, walls and landscaping, and post- construction landscaping of thP. interior grounds. Use of texturing or paint to improve appearance of the surge tower extension should be considered. **Consider visual impacts in the siting and design of structures and land development projects; retain open space for its scenic value. No mitigation measures are required, Implement the most cost effective treatment facilities which use the least amount of energy, such as: l I I ( l ( [ l L l l l [ l ( I [ l I l Area of Concern7 Impact Status Impacts .Mitigation Measures Mitigable Transportation Unavoidable Adverse Impact SECONDARY Urban growth will place greater demands on existing transportation systems and create a need for additional waste disposal facilities, schools, police, fire protection and other governmental services PRIMARY: Construction Construction worker traffic will number 60-80 vehicles per day at Plant #1. At certain stages of construction, temporary local impacts will be signi- ficant. Construction of the headworks will require transport of a significant amount of concrete and thus a great number of trucks will be necessary for concrete delivery (550 trucks over a two to three month period) Plant #2 Construction-related traffic will be similar to Plant #1 but fewer projects will be underway. Impacts should not be significant 1. Maximizing use of digester gas 2. Optimizing sludge dewatering operations to minimize polymer and potable water use 3. Implementing cogeneration projects **Improve public transportation; encourage carpooling; reuse and recovery waste material, etc. A traffic management plan should be developed in cooperation with the selected contractors, the District, Caltrans, and the Cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. Plant #1 has almost direct access to the San Diego Freeway which should minimize local impacts. Relocation of the existing new service entrance and access road has been proposed to provide direct signalized access to and from Plant #1. I I I I I l I l I I I I I [ l l l l Area of Concern/ Impact Status Impacts Mitigation Measures Unavoidable Adverse Impact Mitigable Noise Mitigable Mitigable PRIMARY: Operational There will be approximately a ten percent increase in truck and automobile traffic over existing operations. Truck trips will increase between three and five per day as a result of delivering chlorine, polymers, sodium hydroxide and other chemicals and supplies and hauling grit, sludge and other residues tb an offsite disposal site. SECONDARY Continued overcrowding of Orange County's freeway system will occur unless the region's transit system under- goes some changes. PRIMARY: Construction Noise levels associated with construct- ion at Plant #1 are expected to range from 75 dB(A) to 105 dB(A) within 50 feet of the equipment being used. Pile driving operations (if employed) will generate the greatest source, ranging from 95 dB(A) to 105 dB(A). Noise levels associated with construction of the outfall booster station and replacement of pumps in Headworks C at Plant f 2 are expected to range from 70 dB(A) to 96 dB(A) within 50 feet of the equipment being used. These levels should not result in nuisance noise levels off the site. CSDOC staff should meet with local municipal jurisdictions and agree on a traffic control plan for each of the treatment plants as is proposed for construction-related impacts. **Convert local streets into high-flow arterials: encourage vanpools, staggered work hours, modified work weeks, parking disincentives, promote telecommunications and other menas of reducing dependency on automobiles for transportation or increasing efficiency of existing f aci- li ties. Construction activities should not commence before 7:30 a.m. nor extend past the hour of 5:30 p.m. or the hours stipulated by local ordinances. Low noise level equip- ment and noise barriers should be used. If feasible, pile drivers should not be used. Construction activities should not commence before 7:30 a.m. nor extend past the hour of 5:30 p.m. or the hours stipulated by local ordinances. Low noise level equip- ment and noise barriers should be used. If feasible, pile drivers should not be used. l I I l I I I l I l l l I ( [ [ ( l l Area of Concern/ Im_p_act Status _ ImpaQts _ ---~--_ __ __ _ _ __ ___ __ _ ___ l1_itigation Measures Mitigable Economic Factors Positive Impact Impact Positive Impact PRIMARY: Operational (Both Plants) Community noise sources of greatest concern if not controlled are internal combustion engines, centrifugal blowers or turbines. PRIMARY: Construction District funds are available to complete the projects without neces- sitating additional revenue-raising actions. Additional jobs will be created through the design of the f?cilities, construction, and the administration of contracts. PRIMARY: Operational: The present operating budget of $23.6 million will probably increase by $2.4 million. The increase will occur as a result of improvements made as part of the environmental mitigation projects proposed. SECONDARY The economy of Orange County is expected to prosper with increased development. Nearly all the noise associated with operations can be mitigated by enclosure of noisy operations, selection of low-noise equipment, and scheduling of operations to avoid nighttime operation of vehicles on local surface streets. Workers can be protected by participating in safety training programs and using protective hearing equipment. All future facilities and many existing facilities will be enclosed for odor control purposes. This will also reduce noise. No mitigation measures are required. No mitigation measures are required. **Provide employment opportunities and affordable housing and require new development to pay for capital improve ments needed to accommodate growth. l ( I I I I l l [ l I I I I ( l [ I [ l Area of Concern/ Impact Status Impacts ______ ____ _ _ _ __ _ __ Mitigation Measures Health and Safety csms idera tions No Impacts Mitigable Energy/Resource Commitment Unavoidable Adverse Impact Partially Mitigable PRIMARY: Construction No health and safety impacts are anticipated. PRIMARY: Operational Covering and treating air streams will reduce the concentration of organic gases volatilized during wastewater treatment. PRIMARY: Construction Secondary energy embodied in concrete, steel, equipment and labor constitute the largest commitments of energy. PRIMARY: Operational Energy: Based on a 24 MGD increase, it is estimated that for each million gallons of wastewater treated 11,000 cubic feet of digester gas, 595 Kilowatt hours of electricity and 1,000 cubic feet of natural gas will be utilized. Energy consumption by odor control systems and chemical and con- sumable materials are also quite high• No mitigation measures are required. Cover or enclose existing and new facilities to minimize odors, aerosols, and volatile compound emissions; purchase and maintain best available safety equipment; and con- tinue to conduct safety and training classes. Maximize use of materials by good design and one-time construction of major structures to be fitted with equipment when needed. Energy: Cogeneration and heat recovery projects will reduce energy use; reduce chlorine sodium hydroxide and activated carbon use to the lowest possible level; consider use of digester gas in District vehicles. I I I I I I I l I l I I [ I [ [ l l Area of-Concern? Impact Status_ _ Impact_!;_ _ Mitigation Measures Unavoidable Adverse Impact Unavoidable Adverse Impact Nuisance Factors Resources: Implementing the odor mitigation project will re.ducP. the amount of chlorine used by the Districts1 however, use of hydrogen peroxide, sodium hydroxide, polymers and ferrous and ferric chloride will increase SECONDARY Urban development will increase demands for energy resources such as gasoline, natural gas and electric power PRIMARY: Construction The most significant nuisance conditions likely to occur are odor and traffic. Odors will be greatest when tie-ins with existing facilities occur or when start up of operations commence PRIMARY: Operational See operational impacts under individual subject Resources: Implement proper handling and storage techniques to minimize risk of hazards associated with use of chemicals **Conserve energy in existing and new development projects and commercial and industrial operations See mitigation measures under individual subject headings See operational mitigation measures under individual subject headings l I I I I I l I l I ( I I I I Table 1 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ANO MITIGATION MEASURES Footnotes I I I ( l * Definitions: ** *** Primary Impacts: Those impacts which are directly associated with construction and operation of the proposed projects. Construction Impacts: Relatively short-term impacts which will occur during the construction of the facilities or improvements. They can range from excavation-associated changes in the soil profile to traffic increases associated with construction worker commuting and deliveries of building materials and equipment.· Operational Impacts: Impacts associated with operation of the completed facilities. These can .be either increases or decreases in existing usage patterns for energy, chemicals, air pollutant emissions, expenditures for operation and maintenance or supplies. Operational improvements can reduce these impacts, while the addition of new facilities may change existing conditions either positively (i.e., reduced odors or energy use), or negatively (more employees required, hence increased commuting). Secondary Impacts: Indirect impacts associated with project implementation or accommodation of new urban development. These impacts are numerous in nature and relate to all the activities, needs and demands associated with continued development or redevelopment of portions of the Districts' service area. These impacts are not generated or controlled in any way by the District, but are associated indirectly by their provision of increased treatment capacity to service planned and approved urban growth of member agencies. Mitigation Measures: Measures taken to reduce, minimize or eliminate environmental impacts or the effects of a project. Mitigation can include the following: 1) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action. 2) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation. 3) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment. 4) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action. 5) Compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. The Districts will cooperate with agencies responsible for implementing these measures. partial listing of agencies. See Table 2 for a Cogeneration is the process of generating electricity and recovering heat from a combination of engines and generators with optimized waste heat recovery. The proposed power stations will burn existing surplus di- gester gas in new engines equipped with the best available air pollution control equipment. The two proposed projects will greatly reduce the need to depend upon purchased power from the Southern California Edison Company while reducing overall air pollutant emissions. This will result from substitution of electric motors for internal combustion engines used to drive pumps, blower and other equipment. ... ... .... - - Agency Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region orange County Water District Air Resources Board Table 2 AGENCIES INFLUENCING PROPOSED PROJECT OR HAVING AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT MAJOR MITIGATION MEASURES FOR GROWTH-RELATED IMPACTS Authority Shares responsibility with SWRCB to coordinate and control water quality. Formulates and adopts water quality control plans for CSDOC service area. Implements portions of the Clean Water Act when EPA and SWRCB delegate authority as is the case with issuance of NPDES Permits for waste discharge. Protects and manages the County's groundwater basin. Also, (l) provides for importation of water; (2) prevents water waste; (3) provides advanced treatment for reclamation of wastewater for beneficial reuse, and (4) pro- vides for conservation and control of storm water and flood water flowing into the District. Responsible for maintaining and managing groundwater recharge facilities, multi-purpose projects and sea water intrusion control projects including the Water Factory 21 advanced treatment facilities. Responsible for the adoption and enforcement of standards, rules, and regulations for the control-of air pollution from mobile sources throughout the State. Southern California Association of Governments Formed to provide more effective reqional pl·anning in Southern California. Charged with providing a framework for orderly regional growth and developmentJ a clearinghouse for Federal grant applications such as those required to obtain a Clean Water Grant for wastewater treatment facilities. Local Agency Formation Commission State Department of Water Resources Metropolitan Water District State Department of Health South Coast Air Quality Management District California Energy Commission County of Orange Local Cities (within CSDOC service area) Empowered to approve or disapprove all proposals to incorporate cities to form special districts or to annex territories to cities or special district. Also empowered to guide growth of governmental service responsibilities. Provides planning, design, construction and management of water resources on a statewide basis to serve local water management agencies with dependable supplies of water. Responsible for the development, storage, transportation and wholesaling of water to member agencies for domestic and municipal purposes. Obtains water from California State Water Project and Colorado River Aqueduct • Responsible for the purity, wholesomeness, and potability of domestic water supplies for the State. Assists State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Boards in setting quality standards of wastewater discharge. Adopts and enforces local regulations governing stationary sources of air pollutants. Issues Authority to Construct Permits and Permits to Operate. Provides compliance inspections of facilities and monitors regional air quality. Requires energy needs forecasts from public utilities serving the CSDOC service area. Considers applications for new energy facilities and certifies as to their need and grants necessary approvals through rigorous regulatory process to assure compliance with environmental protection laws and regulations. Responsible for planning, land use and environmental protection of unincorporated areas. Of particular importance are development of presently undeveloped lands, provision of regional solid waste management facilities, and regional transportation, air quality and flood control improvement programs. Responsible for adoption of local General Plans and various planning elements and local land use regulation. Responsible for local collector sewera~e facilities. Adopt and implement local ordinances for control of noise and other environmental concerns. Participate in regional air quality maintenance planning through adoption of local programs to control emissions via transportation improvements. Responsible for enforcing adopted energy efficiency standards in new construction. ... BACKGROUND INFORMATION Historical Overview Historically, there have been several comprehensive studies to evaluate Orange County's wastewater facilities needs. These have guided the formation of the Districts and the location of existing regional facilities. These include: Rawn, A. M., C. Gilman Hyde, and F. Thomas, 1947. "Report Upon the Collection, Treatment, amd Disposal of Sewage and Industrial Wastes of Orange County, California." July 1. (Prepared for the Orange County Board of Supervisors.) Lowry and Associates and Engineering Science, Inc., 1966. "Wastewater Disposal and Reclamation for the County of Orange, California, 1966-2000." July. John Carollo Engineers, 1975. "1975-2000 Wastewater Facilities Plan for Joint Works Facilities". John Carollo Engineers, 1983. "Master Plan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities". ... Reclamation Plant No. 1 lies at the site of the original Joint Screening Plant constructed in 1923 by the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization (JOS). The JOS was a joint powers group of several cities and sanitary districts and was the predecessor of the County Sanitation Districts which took over sewerage operations in 1954. -11- ... The selection of the location of the two CSDOC treatment facilities was the result of the decision in the late 1940's to form the Districts and assume the operation of the JOS facilities (Rawn, A. M. et al.). Portions of the CSDOC Treatment Plant No. 2 were originally constructed in 1953 with monies provided by a 1951 bond issue. The plant consisted of an 18-MGD primary treatment facility connected to a 7,000-foot, 78-inch outfall extending offshore of the mouth of the Santa Ana River. The outfall also received effluent from the old Joint Outfall Sewer Plant in Fountain Valley (now Reclamation Plant No. 1). Over the past 35 years, over $382 million (current value estimated at over $750 million) has been invested to expand the capacity and upgrade the level of treatment necessary to handle flows from the growing service area while meeting effluent discharge requirements and protecting public health and the marine environment along Orange County's intensively utilized coastal zone. Within the past decade, major projects have been the addition of secondary treatment facilities, including a 46 MGD air activated sludge process at Plant No. 1 and 75 MGD of pure oxygen activated sludge process at Plant No. 2. In addition to those listed above, numerous planning studies have been conducted which analyzed and recommended CSDOC facility improvements for the Joint Works. These include: *Project Report for 1971-71 Joint Works Improvements and Additions. *Project Report No. 1 for 1972-73 Joint Works Improvements and Additions. *Project Report and Environmental Impact Report for Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (August, 1972). -12- *CSDOC Wastewater Management Program, Facilities Plan and Draft EIR/EIS (March, 1977). *Areawide Waste Treatment Management (208 Plan) and Water Quality Planning Framework (April, 1979). *CSDOC Wastewater Management Program, Environmental Impact Report. Flow equalization and Hydraulic Reliability Project (August, 1980). *CSDOC Master Plan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities (April, 1983). To facilitate planning through the year 2002 and budgeting for the next five years, and to identify needs in the system, the Districts, during fiscal year 1982-83, prepared three District master plan studies and a Joint Works study. These reports reviewed the existing system, identified deficiencies in the collection and treatment facilities, proposed new construction projects to alleviate these deficiencies, recommended a sequence of construction and estimated project costs. The 1983 Joint Works Master Plan identified facilities needed to serve the Districts' projected sewage treatment and disposal needs through the year 2002 and is the basis of this DEIR. The specific facilities on which this impact assessment is focused, however, are those anticipated for design and construction during the next five years at the two joint works facilities. Facilities needs are determined through a two-part, on-going (in 5-year incremental periods) planning process. The first element consists of Master -13- Plans for wastewater collection facilities consisting of regional and subregional interceptor sewers. These facilities are determined as a response to periodic review and evaluation of local city land use plans to determine projected land use changes and planned and approved urban growth. Various flow coefficients are applied to these land use projections, and various collector sewer capacity needs are calculated. Appropriately sized facilities are subsequently evaluated to accommodate urban growth. Collection facilities are then constructed for conveyance of flow to the two regional treatment facilities. During the next 20 years, average wastewater flows to be treated by the Districts are projected to increase to 307 MGD. During the next five years, flows are expected to increase by as much as 24 MGD. Projected increases in sewage flows beyond present reclamation needs for some areas adjacent to the present District service area have raised the issue of proposing the formation of a new District (No. 14) which would encompass a portion of the area served by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD). The major impetus for such an action is the high cost of providing complete reclamation for the entire wastewater flow generated by this area, insufficient reuse areas and protection of the water quality of areas where the -wastewater might be discharged at present (i.e., tributaries to Newport Bay). A formal proposal for the formation of District No. 14 is being addressed in a separate EIR. Such a proposal is presently outside the scope of this report. The interest in forming a new District is noteworthy, however, because it is indicative of the high costs associated with the smaller IRWD subregional -14- .. .... .... ... ... facility which does not have an ocean outfall for effluent disposal. The IRWD must reclaim all wastewater since a discharge to a sensitive estuarine environmental area such as Newport Bay is restricted. Such an action illustrates the tremendous pressure placed on urban services to provide low cost services to a growing population. The 1983 CSDOC Master Plan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities identified treatment and disposal facility improvements which were needed at the Joint Treatment Works of the CSDOC over the next twenty years focusing on those facilities needed during the next five years (1983-1988). Due to delays in implementing the Master Plan recommendations and preparJng environmental documents, the time frame for the needed facilities has now been shortened and the need is more immediate. The purpose of this EIR is to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with constructing the facilities proposed in the 1983 Master Plan. It also addresses facilities proposed since then, such as retrofit~ing of primary clarifiers and other uncovered facilities with odor control facilities, and a cogeneration facility at each of the two plants for purposes of maximizing use of digester gas and reducing air pollutant emissions. Description of Existing Facilities Generalized Treatment Process Descriptions A generalized description of the sewage treatment processes used at the two treatment plants is contained in the following paragraphs. A process flow diagram depicting these processes in shown in Figure 5 • -15- l I I l I I l l I I l l_ l l l -_....._ ................. _,. __ ............... ______ ._._ ___ , lnfluenl Waslewale• Ellls Ave. Pump Slallon lnRuenl Waslewaler Prechlofinatlon tnnuenl Diversion Slruclure • c ::J i • ~ Bar to l•ndflll Prechlorlnallon Bar Screens Screenings to Burlal Grll lo l•ndfllt Grll lo Burlal Flllrale Rel urn Digested Sludge CSDOC Reclamallon Plant No I Dlgesler Oas lo Engines Bart Presses ~ landfill Sludge Disposal Primary Efnuenl Oxygen A8r8iiOn RAS WAS Bell Prease1 Digested Sludge rt t I landfill Sludge Disposal n-TI" CSDOC T realmenl Planl No 2 l Planl No. I Efnuenl l 120· Ocean OulfaU Oulfaa Booster Pump Stallons Planl No. 2 Elnuenl PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM FOR CSDOC TREATMENT PLANTS FIGURE 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I L --.-'.!. .. ... ... ... ... ... Influent flow to the two treatment plants enters a headworks and then passes through bar screens. Screenings are discharged on conveyor belts which transport them to bins for disposal in a sanitary landfill. The headworks pumps lift the influent to provide gravity flow through the primary treatment process. The treated effluent is pumped again at the secondary treatment facilities and once again for ocean disposal. Pumps are either gas-engine driven or are electric-motor driven. The gas engine pumps are fueled by either natural or digester gas while the electric motors use purchased electrical power from the Southern California Edison Company. Emergency power generators of limited capacity are available to assist if there are temporary power outages. After initial pumping at the headworks, wastewater enters one of two aerated grit chambers, where the grit is then washed to remove organics • Removed grit is conveyed into storage hoppers where it is then removed for disposal at a sanitary landfill. Wastewater from the grit chambers flows to distribution boxes and is dispersed among primary sedimentation basins. Each basin has a theoretical holding time of 2.1 hours. After primary treatment at Plant No. 2, wastewaters flow by gravity to either a conventional activated sludge treatment plant or trickling filters (at Plant No. 1), or pure oxygen activated sludge plant (at Plant No. 2) • Digested sludge is dewatered with belt filter presses and hauled to Coyote Canyon disposal by direct incorporation with municipal solid waste at a required mixing ratio of 10:1 to facilitate moisture absorption • -16- .... .. .. .. A more detailed description of the primary and secondary treatment processes at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 is available in the Districts' Annual Report. Reclamation Plant No. 1 Reclamation Plant No. 1, located in the City of Fountain Valley on a 108 acre site, now has treatment facilities covering about 65 acres of the site. Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 include screening, grit removal, primary treatment, and secondary treatment. A process flow diagram is shown in Figure 5. The Plant treats about 26 percent (60 MGD) of the 230 MGD of wastewater presently received at the Joint Works. The Plant has a design capacity of 46 MGD, however, optimization of secondary treatment capabilities through more efficient operation has enabled the facility to treat up to 60 MGD. The secondary treatment processes are a combination of air activated sludge and trickling filters. The 14 MGD of extra treatment capability has resulted from changes in operation of various tributary food processing industries (less loading to system) and an active source control program by the Districts which has reduced influent wastewater strength. Up to 15 MGD of secondary effluent from Plant No. 1 can be diverted to the Orange County Water District's advanced wastewater treatment plant (Water Factory 21) for further treatment and reclamation. The balance of the secondary effluent is co-mingled with the effluent from Plant No. 2 prior to ocean disposal via a 27,400 foot long ocean outfall which includes a 6,000 foot long diffuser section • -17- ... .. ... ... .. Treatment Plant No. 2 Occupying 105 acre~ of land, Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach provides screening and grit removal and primary treatment for a design capacity of 186 MGD of primary treatment and 75 MGD of secondary treatment. Capacity is presently fully utilized with standby or reserve capacity. Wastewaters enter the plant's headworks via trunk sewers or via the 78-inch to 96-inch interplant diversion sewer which brings flows from the metering and diversion structure at Plant No. 1 which diverts flows in excess of 60 MGD tributary to Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 for treatment (Figure 2). The water receives primary treatment using the same processes at Plant No. 1 (Figure 5). Secondary treatment is provided for an average of 75 MGD using the pure oxygen activated sludge process. Interplant System The interplant system is comprised of a metering and diversion structure located at Plant No. 1, a 78 to 96-inch influent wastewater diversion system to divert wastewater from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2, and 66 and 84-inch interplant effluent lines that carry Reclamation Plant No. 1 effluent to Treatment Plant No. 2 and to the outfall system (see Figure 2). The combined capacity of the 66 and 84-inch interplant effluent lines that parallel the Santa Ana River is 174 MGD • Joint Facilities The Joint Facilities (those used by both plants) consist primarily of outfall disposal facilities. The ocean outfall system is composed of two -18- .... .. .... ... ... ... .... outfall booster pump stations and two ocean outfalls. The outfall system includes an older 78-inch, 7000-foot long outfall (now for emergency use only) and a newer 27,400-foot long, 120-inch outfall placed in service in 1971. The two pump stations pump to the 120-inch outfall which is the main discharge point for the District. The 78-inch outfall has not been used since the 120-inch outfall was put in service, but can be used for emergencies • The outfall system capacity is a function of the outfall size, frictional drag, surge tower height and ocean tide level at the time of discharge. With sufficient pumping capacity installed, the outfall system could discharge about 420 MGD at high tide. Outfall booster pumping capacity, however, is currently limited to 350 MGD (plus 150 MGD of standby capacity) at high tide • Recorded Wastewater Flows Wastewater flow is metered on a continual basis at the Districts' treatment facilities. Each District is responsible for the cost of its share of the flows. Historically, a greater quantity of trunkline flow has been tributary to Plant No. 2. This trend has changed and recent data indicate that a greater amount of flow has been tributary to Plant No. 1, necessitating more improvements to hydraulically handle and treat these flows. Flows tributary to Plant No. 1 that exceed 60 MGD are currently diverted to Plant No. 2 via the metering and diversion structure and influent interplant lines. This trend is expected to continue. Reclamation Plant No. 1 treats 60 MGD to a secondary level and is capable of passing a hydraulic peak of 100 MGD through the plant. -19- .. ... ... Waste Discharge Requirements for Ocean Disposal With the exception of wastewater reclaimed at Water Factory 21, all wastewaters curently generated in the CSDOC service area are discharged into the Pacific Ocean through the 120-inch marine outfall. Discharge requirements for these wastewaters are established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board CRWQCB), Santa Ana Region, and are defined in the Districts' NPOES permit issued under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. The permit is issued to each discharge point source and includes requirements imposed by EPA and RWQCB. Table 3 shows a comparison of proposed discharge requirements under the 30l{h) NPDES Permit and recent wastewater effluent quality. The current discharge consists of a blend of primary and secondary effluents • -20- ... ... .... TABLE 3 NPOES Discharge Requirements and CSOOC Annual Average Ocean Effluent Discharge Values, 1983-84. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. NPOES Effluent Limits Maximum June, 1983 to JO-Day 7-Day At June, 1984 Constituent Average Average Any Time Annual Average 800 5 , mg/l 100 150 106 Suspended Solids, mg/l 63-66 69 Grease and Oil, mg/l 25 40 75 13 Settleable Solids, ml/i 1.0 1.5 3.0 1.0 Toxicity Concentration, tu 1.5 2.0 2.5 Turbidity, JTU 75 100 225 43 6-Month Daily Instantaneous Annual Average Median Maximum Maximum continued Arsenic, ug/l 10 40 100 4 Cadmium, ug/l 20 80 200 8 Hexavalent chromium, ug/l 100 400 1000 61* Copper, ~/l JOO 1200 3000 151 Lead, ug/l 100 400 1000 50 Mercury, u'/l l 4 10 0.41 Nickel, ug l 100 400 1000 60 Silver, ug/l JO 120 200 13 Zinc, ug/l JOO 1200 3000 160 Cyanide, ug/l 100 400 1000 15 Total chlorine reeidual,ug/l l 4 10 0 Ammonia -N, ug/l 30,000 40,000 60,000 24,000 Phenolic compounds, (non-chlorinated), ug/1 500 2000 5000 40 Phenols, chlorinated, u7/1 150 600 1500 no analysis Aldrin and dieldrin, ug l o.3 0.6 0.9 O*** Chloradane and related compounds, ug/l 0.3 0.6 0.9 O*** DOT and derivatives, ug/l 0.07 0.15 0.22 0.062** Endrin, ug/l 0.3 0.6 0.9 O*** HCH (BCH), ug/l 0.6 1.2 1.8 .287 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's), ug/l**** 1.5 3.0 4.5 1.69 Toxaphene 1.05 2.1 J.15 O*** Radioactivity -see monthly reports - * Analysis reported is for total chromium. ** The number reported has been calculated by averaging the data above and data below the detection limits (which was assumed to be zero). *** The compound is consistently below the analysis equipment detection limits and has been assumed to be zero. **** Interim ermit limits II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS APRIL lOJ 1985 -7:30 P.M. ALL DISTRICTS Post Offic e Box 8127 1 0844 El I is Avenue Founta i n V alley, Ca l if., 9270 8 Tele phones: Area Code 7 1 4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (5) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file minu te except a n d Resolut i on No. 85-60 from the Board of Supervisors seat i n g Thomas F . Ri l e y a s t he Chairman of the Board of Super v isors and appointing Ro ge r R. S tanton to serve as Active Director on the Boards of Directors of Di s t r i cts No s. 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, and appointing Harriett M. Wieder t o serve a s Alternate Director on each of said Boards. (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excer p ts fr om t he following re election of mayor, appointment o f a l ternate Dir e ctors, and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor ) City/Agency District(s ) Active Director Al t er n a t e Di rec to r Villa Park 2 Carol H. Kawanami Wa y ne Sil ze l * Costa Mesa Sanitary Dist. 6 James Wahner James B. Ga l lach e r ALL DISTRICTS (16) (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny the claim submitted by Southern California Edison Company dated February 4, 1985, in t he amount of $1,933 .85 for alleged damages to their facili t ies incurred in connection with construction of Paving and Drainage at Treatment P lant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrato r, General Counsel, contractor and contractor's insurance compan y for appropriate action (b) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of Charles A. Jac ks as Assistant Laboratory Director at Step 5 of Range No. 1066G ($3390 /month ) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR METING April 4, 1985 -7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of March 13, ·1985, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' Administrative Offices. The Chairman pro tem called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: DIRECTORS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PR&gENT: OTHERS: Don Griffin, Chairman pro tern, Ruth Bailey, Oscar Brownell, Dan Griset, John Holmberg, James Neal, Chris Norby, Richard Olson, Richard Partin, Bob Perry, Richard Polis, Charles Sylvia Carrey Nelson, Don Roth, Sal Sapien, Roger Stanton J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes, William H. Butler, Gary Streed Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel, Frank Dryden * * * * * * * * * * * * * Approving March 1985 Sewer Corrosion and Odor Abatement Study: Miller-Holder Interceptor System The General Manager reported that in October the Board had engaged the consulting firm of Malcolm Pirnie to conduct a sewer corrosion and odor abatement study in the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. The Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer is the Districts' longest sewer line and conveys sewage from the City of La Habra all the way to Plant 2 in Huntington Beach. Mr. Sylvester introduced Mr. Frank Dryden, representing Malcolm Pirnie, who reviewed the engineering consultant's study and findings. The study evaluated the addition of several chemicals and concluded that the optimum chemical for control of odors as well as corrosion in the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer would be the injection of caustic soda approximately every ten days during warm weather and every fifteen days during the cooler weather at various points along the trunk sewer. The anticipated annual cost for such a program would be $75,000.00. Following a brief discussion it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the March 1985 Sewer Corrosion and Odor Abatement Study: Miller-Holder Interceptor System, prepared by Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -1- 4/4/85 -~~··• Authorizing staff to implement the Moved, seconded and duly carried: recommendations of the Malcolm Pirnie Sewer Corrosion and Odor That the staff be, and is hereby, Abatement Study authorized and directed to implement the reconunendations of the Malcolm Pirnie, ~ March 1985 Sewer Corrosion and Odor Abatement Study: Miller-Holder Interceptor System. Authorizing staff to solicit proposals from suppliers for the annual procurement of caustic soda for odor abatement in the Miller- Holder Trunk Sewer system Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer system as Corrosion and Odor Abatement Study. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals from suppliers for the annual procurement of caustic soda for odor abatement in the recommended in the Malcolm Pirnie Sewer Staff report re Miller-Holder Trunk The staff reported that, for the reasons Sewer Odor Control Study and described in the Malcolm Pirnie report, Manhole/Vault Rehabilitation the Districts' had experienced considerable deterioration in its manhole vaults on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System between Treatment Plant No. 2 and Imperial Highway in the city of La Habra. The Deputy Chief Engineer reported that during the last l~ years the Directors of District No. 3 had awarded two contracts totaling nearly $900,000.00 for the rehabilitation of twenty of the most badly corroded vaults on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. Mr. Dawes reported that staff had just concluded a survey of the remaining manholes on the Miller-Holder sewer and that an additional 74 were in need of replacement or repair. He estimated the cost for rehabilitation of the remaining manholes to be $1,750,000. '\.,,.) It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff report dated March 28, 1985 re Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Odor Control Study and Manhole/Vault Rehabilitation be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement for the design of 74 vaults on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer for Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Conunittee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement for the design of rehabilitation of 74 vaults consideration by the Board. Approving policy re settlement of The Deputy Chief Engineer reported that, claims for damages to local sewer similar to the District's experience, manholes adjacent to the District's the local sewering agencies trunk sewers (Cities/Sanitary Districts) had also experienced manhole corrosion, apparently as a result of hydrogen sulfide gases migrating from the Districts' trunk sewers into the local systems. Generally, the local system damage has been limited to the first manhole upstream from the District's trunk sewer connection. He reported that requests for compensation for damages to the local system ~ -2- 4/4/85 facilities have been received from the City of Fountain Valley, the City of Huntington Beach, the City of Buena Park and the Midway City Sanitary District. He stated that District's crews have spot-checked manholes owned by local agencies and confirmed damages. The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning a policy regarding the settlement of claims against the District for damage to local agency manholes. During the discussion it was pointed out that the Joint Boards at their regular March meeting had adopted a policy concerning settlement of such claims. However the policy did not fix a settlement amount but rather provided that each individual District determine its settlement basis or amount. There are four basic settlement alternatives. 1) The full cost of repairs; 2) a percentage of the cost: 3) a fixed (average) amount: or 4) denial of the claim. It was pointed out that both the full cost of the repairs or denial of the claim in its entirety appeared to have been precluded by the adopted policy statement which recognizes that there is a shared responsibility of both the Sanitation District and the local sewering agency. As the amount of damage sustained by the local sewering agencies generally increases the closer the agency is to the lower reaches of the trunk sewer, a flat fee per manhole also appeared to be inequitable. Therefore, the concensus was that a percentage of the contract construction cost to repair local agency manholes would be the most appropriate method of settling claims for damages. It was then moved and seconded: That the District establish a policy of paying 90% of the cost of rehabilitating local sewering agency manholes damaged by hydrogen sulfide gases emanating from the District's trunk sewers. The Board then entered into a discussion concerning time limits for filing of claims to be paid pursuant to the proposed District's policy and time limits for honoring said claims. After the discussion an amendment to the original motion was moved and seconded to provide time limitations for filing of claims and payment of such claims. Following further discussion the amended motion was duly adopted. The Board's adopted policy statement is set forth below: POLICY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 RE SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGE TO LOCAL SEWER MANHOLES The Board of Directors, upon receiving a detailed report of its staff and General Counsel, relating to damages incurred by Cities and Sanitary Districts to their local manhole facilities which are located in the proximate vicinity of District's trunk sewer lines, determined that it was in the best interests of the District to effect a settlement of claims for reimbursement of these damages to each of the entities. The Directors have taken into consideration the relative degree of ~ responsibility between the Sanitation District and the local sewering agency, together with the estimated costs of repair of said facilities, and based thereon, the Board of Directors does hereby adopt as its policy: -3- 4/4/85 "The Board of Directors does approve the settlement of claims made by any local sewering agency wherein damage has been incurred to its local trunk sewer facilities, including manholes, which are connected to the Districts' trunk sewers. Pursuant to this policy, the District will pay to each local sewering agency, the following proportional amount of the actual contracted construction costs (exclusive of design, inspection, and administration expenses) to rehabilitate each manhole proven to have incurred damage resulting, in part, from hydrogen sulfide gases emanating from the District's trunk sewers, provided that claims for said damages be filed with the District within sixty (60) days of notification of this policy: For Rehabilitation Work Completed Within Following Time Periods After Policy Notification 24 25 -36 37 -48 49 + Months Months Months Months Percent of Contracted Construction Costs To Be Paid By District 90% 60% 30% 0% Further provided that the policy is to be implemented by payment in accordance with the above schedule, subject to: 1. The District receiving a general release of all claims from the local sewering agency including a waiver of any future claims for damages to its facilities. 2. The local sewering agency undertaking the repair of its manhole facilities with materials and in accordance with specifications approved by the District. 3. Agreement by the local sewering agency that all new connections to District facilities will be made with manholes protected in accordance with specifications approved by the District. This policy shall further be limited with regards to reimbursement for manholes already repaired by any local sewering agency to those which have been repaired since January 1, 1982." Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman pro tern then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:53 p.m., April 4, 1985. -4- ,JOll NO. --------PLANT NO. l ----- Pl -?.'111 Rrhahilitate Rasins 3, '1 and 5 Pl -23R Rep lace and Cover Rasins l anrl ?. Pl-25 Cover Rasins 3 , 4, 5 I' 1-/>li Nrw Scruhhe r System PL/\NT NO. 2 ------- 1'2 -31R Hrhahilitatt> Ras in s fl , ll, C, 11, I, ,J, K, L and M 1'2-51!-2 Rrhahili l ate Rasins F, G P2 -;>q Rrhah ilita te Rasins D, E 1'2 -3'1 llrarh~orks R Grit Removal anrl Adjacent I mprovements 1'2 -32 C:ovr.r 1\,15 ins I\ through 0 fl ?-33 Nt>w Scruhhrr Systems r-~-~~;;~-------- , <l=--l)r><, 1 qn I II " II i <I f\ ~ l\1·1 .1rd c = f'.11n•,1r11 r.L ,_ ---. ------------- () ~ {J cJ { ( OF.SI!;N /\Nil r.n Nsrr111r.r10N Sf'.llElllJ LE ODOR MJT!(;flr !ON /\N il HEL /\T [I) R[llflnl l!T/\TION ~,. ft r [ __________ )15/llli ___ ~_ 6/67 I ( r 1<)!)5 1 q35 19 8 7 . r 11 A M J . .A .s .o .N _O .J .F M A M ,J ,J ,A S 0 N 0 J F M .A .M J 1 J 1 A r d--------'d n I\ I I I I I I rl-------------------( I I I I d-----------rl I fl I I I I cl-----------cl I ll I A ------c , ____ C ___ \ I +r -r-i::J::r:i:::1:J ___ , c---1--1--1--l __ J __ J __ J __ J __ J __ J_c c---------- rt ----------rl 11 fl I c--------------------c I I I I I I I ----------------------------c lrt __ l ___ lcl 1n Ill I c-l ___ l ___ l ___ l _________________________ c I I I I I I I I I d-----------------d I\ fl c -----------------------c I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. cl-----------rl {\ c----------------------------------------------c I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I rl-----------rl ll fl c------------------------------c I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ':::0 l rn 1 ·. 'J> I CJ> rn :z t:::1 J> ,_... -l rn 3 :z 0 '-..J ......... )> ....__, " RE: A&®DA_~ftEM #14 April 10, 1985 REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE April 4, 1985 1. All-Risk and Excess Liability Insurance Pol1cy Renewals As discussed in the Manager's Agenda Report and the Executive Committee Report, the Fiscal Policy Committee has been reviewing the status of the Districts' all-risk property and excess liability insurance policies. The Fiscal ~olicy Committee met on Thursday, April 4, at the request of the Executive Committee to evaluate the Districts' available options £or renewing these insurance policies and to develop recommendations for presentation to the Joint Boards at tonight's meeting for renewal of these two types of insurance coverage. RECOMMENDATIONS The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends approval of the following actions relative to acquisition of all-risk property and excess llabil1ty coverage for a one-year period commencing April 14, 1985: Agenda Item: il4(b) (1): Consideration of motion authorizing staff to place all-risk insurance cover,age, including earthquake and flood protection, effective April 14, 1985, for an estimated annual premium of $195,000, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee, as follows: Facilities Covered: Limits of Coverage: Deductibles: Treatment plants and pump stations (excludes trunk sewers and ocean outfalls) $10,000,000 Earthquake: Flood: Other: 5% of replacement cost of damaged facilities $25,000 $10,000 il4(b) (2): Consideration of motion directing staff to include an appropriation account in each individual District's 1985-86 budget to begin accumulating reserve funds to pay for potential earthquake and flood damage to Districts' facilities, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. il4(c): Consideration of motion authorizing staff to place an initial $900,000 excess liability coverage effective April 14, 1985, with a deductible ·· of $25 1 000 per claim and a $250,000 aggregate, for an estimated annual premium of $75,000, as recommended by the Fiscal .Policy Committee. il4(d): Consideration of Resolutfon No. 85-68 (attached pink copy) and Resolution No. 85-69 (attached tan copy), urging the· California Legisrature to adopt Senate Bilis 75 and 639, respectively, relating to limitation of -11abillty for public agencies. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page Two April 10, 1985 BACKGROUND Both our all-risk property coverage and the initial portion of our excess liability coverage require renewal· by April-14, 1985. Based upon direction from the staff, the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee, the Districts' insurance broker has sought new coverage. These proposals reflect the rapidly deteriorating insurance marketplace and the resulting lower coverage levels in addition to higher premium costs. The attached material outlines the Districts' existing levels of coverage (salmon - property coverage/blue -excess liability coverage) as welr as the options available for acquiring coverage for the next year. In the case of the all-risk property coverage, which presently insures all of our facilities and equipment up to $150,000,000 against such hazards as earthquake, flood, fire or theft, the policy expires on April 14, 1985, and various of our existing pool of carriers have advised us they will not renew our coverage. The Fiscal Policy Committee has· reviewed our existing coverage levels and the limited options available for the next year, and recommends a basic level· of all-risk property coverage of $10,000,000 at a premium of $195,000. The Districts' broker was unable to locate any insurance company willing to provide coverage for the Districts' sewer lines and the ocean outfalls, and hence the coverage proposed by the Committee is applicable to the Districts' treatment plants and pumping stations. The Committee and staff felt that the Districts• risk of major sewer line or outfall breakages would be limited in the event of a major earthquake. Our system extends throughout our 330-square mile service area, and any damage to.our lines would most probably be localized. In light of the significantly decreased levels of all-risk property coverage available due to the lack of reinsurance capacity in the insurance marketplace, the Connnittee discussed establishment of reserve funds to cover the Districts' costs related to replacement or reconstruction of facilities damaged in an earthquake. As outlined in the attached material· (salmon) under Deductible/Self-Insured Retention, the Districts must pay the first 5% of any damages caused by an earthquake. These reserves will accumulate over a period of. years to cover the Districts• self-insured portion of any damage to the Districts' facilities covered by the proposed insurance as well as any damage to the sewers and the outfalls, which are not covered under either the proposed policy or the two other options identiffed on the exhibit. The Committee also acknowledged that Federal-disaster funds might be available to the Districts in the event of a major disaster. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that the staff be directed to develop separate reserve appropriations for inclusion in each individual District's 1985-86 budget to begin accumulating reserves to pay for any potential-earthquake or flood damage to the individual District's sewer lines or any jointly owned 11nes or·Joint Works facilities which might suffer earthquake or flood damage not covered by.insurance or Federal disaster relief funds. The Fiscal.Policy Committee will then review these reserve appropriation levels during the course of its' ongoing review of the 1985-86 - budgets, and will present recommendations to the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards for consideration during the budget adoption process fn June and July of this year. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page Three April 10, 1985 The Committee also recommended extension of the initial .$900,000 of excess liabil1ty coverage at a premium of $75,000. The· policy year for the initial .$900,000 of our existing $21,000,000 excess liability coverage was from July 1, 1984 through June 30, 1985, but in mid-February the Districts and our broker were notified that one of the two companies providing this coverage intended to cancel its portion effective April 14, 1985. Our existing $20,000,000 in coverage over and above the initial ,$900,000 remains in force at this time, and the Committee expects to review proposals for renewal of this coverage in the near future. The recommended actions outlined earlier in the report will provide the Districts with basic levels of all-risk property and excess liability coverage for the next year. The Fiscal.Policy Committee intends to continue to review the Districts' insurance policies on an annual~basis, and will present its recommendations to the Executive Committee from time to time, as appropriate. The Districts' General Counsel· has brought to our attention proposed legislation now before the California State Legislature that would 11mit the liability of public ·agencies against excessive damage claims based upon the state's existing joint and several liability doctrine ('deep pockets') that has resulted in major judgments to plaintiffs.by public agencies, including some major judgments handed down recently involving cities here in Orange County. The attached material, including a memorandum to the Committee from the General .Counsel· dated April 11 1985, and two resolutions supporting ~e proposed legisration, were reviewed by the Committee, and are recommended for approval· by the Boards. Respectfully submitted, FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: James Wahner, Chairman Don Griffin Dan Gri"set Carol Kawanami Phillp Maurer James Neal Richard Olson Joint Chairman Richard Edgar, ex officio Director Bob Perry, ex officio Exis tio;v'Prop.:se:l Type of ~rcge ~Date ---------- Property a:Nerage in::lLrlinJ all-risk A. EKisrm::r(l984-85) April 14, 1985 B. PRJl:UiID ~ 1. ~tioo 1 April 14, 1985 2. ~tioo 2 April 14, 1985 3. ~ticn 3 April 14, 1985 if available EKISffNG lliSllWO: ffi.1ERllG: ~. m:::i:a:ED CDJERlG: AVAII.ABIE Dedlctible Self-1984-85 ~t of Cove_r~e In.sured Retentioo Premiun $150,000,000 Earthq..ake: $500, 000 $187,500 earthqwke/flcod, Flcx:rl: $ 25,000 plus fire, theft, All-Risk: $ 5,000 etc. (all-risk) $10,000,000 Eartlq..ake: 5% of earthqLake, flo:rl, repla::anent rost of fire, theft, etc. dam:ged fccili ties (all-risk) Fl.cx:d: $25,000 All-Risk: $10,000 $50,000,000* Earthqwke: 5% of earthqwke/flcod, replco:mnt rost of plus $10,000,000 dama:Jed fccilities fire, theft, etc. Flcx:rl: $25,000 (all-risk) All-Risk: $10,000 All-Risk: $10,000 $75,000,000* Earthq..ake: 5% of earthqwke/flcxrl, replco:mnt o::>st of plus $10,000,000 dam:gErl fccilities fire, t:h:!ft, etc. Flood: $25,000 (all-risk) All-Risk: $10,000 Proµ:sErl Estim3.ted 1985-86 Premiun CancellErl efftctive April 15, 1985/rot rereiv.abl.e by exist- inJ carders $195,000 $230,000 $290,000 (' 3/27/85 Revi.serl 4/10/85 Ranarks Irr:lu'les OO\\er lires, pmp statioos, treat- rrent plant arrl oot- falls Irr:J.Lrles µnp staticr arrl treat::m:nt plants Irr:lu'les p.np statia- arrl treat::m:nt plants Irr:lu'les p.11p statiai arrl treat::m:nt plants Existing/Prqx:sed 'l)1?e of O:Jverage IEnew:ll Date :Exl::ESS Pl:blic Liability A. EKISI'I00-(1984-85) April 14 I 1985 July 1, 1$5 B. PR)f(SID 1. Pla1 I April 14 I 1985 2. Plan II April 14 I 1985 EKISffNG lNs:!Wll: <n.EWG: vs: ~ ClJVERZ\rn AVAIIABIE Ano.nt of Covera:Je $900,000 $20,000,000 al::x:lw original $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 J):rlu::tible Self-1984-85 Insured Retentim Premiun $1DO,OOO $22,500 $1,000,000 $18 ,300 'lbtal = $40,800 $1DO,OOO $25, 000 for eJery cl.aim w/$250,000 =te 'lbtal re newal cost estimate: 3/27/85 Pro{mErl F..stinated 1985-86 Premiun Rararks Chtpany will:oot Origi.ral · expiratim renew date July 1, 1985/ Chtpany ~ed effective April 14, 1985 Unkrn.n at this tirre, tut estinated to re $55,00<r$65,ooo $105,000 $ 75,000 $130,00<r$170,000 r '-""'ES G . ROUR K E T H O MAS L WOODRU FF A L A N R . WATTS K ENNAR D R SMART, .J R D~NI E L K . SPRADL I N LY D I A S L E V I N MARK T W IL LMAN SU Z ANN E D -A T K I N S L OI S E .J EFF R E Y T HOMA S F. NI XO N To: Fr om: Re: LAW O FFI C ES O F R our k e & Woo druff A PROF'ESS I ONAL. C O RPORA T I ON S U ITE 1020 C A L I FOR NIA F I RST BANK BUILDI NG I O S S NORT H M AIN STR EET SAN T A A N A, C A L I F O R NIA 9270 1 TE L E PHONE (7 14) 6 35-6212 MEMORANDUM Fiscal Policy Committee County Sanitation Districts General Counsel Date: April 1, 1985 Senate Bill 7 5 TELE C OPI ER : (7 14 } 835 ·7 78 7 CABL E ADDRE S S : RORW OOD T E LE X : 8 0 ·4294 As the Committee Members are aware, public agencies, including cities and special districts, have been suffering over the past many years with a very inequitable principle of law relating to the legal responsibility to satisfy judgments that are rendered against the public agencies jointly with other defendants in the same lawsuit. This is commonly referred to as the "deep pocket" theory, wherein a plaintiff may sue several defendants, including the public agency, and if, by example, the agency is found 1% responsible, the successful plaintiff can, nevertheless, collect the entire 100 % of his judgment from the public agency. This is highly likely if the other defendants, regardless of their percentage of fault, have no financial means to satisfy any judgment. For y ears, the public agencies and their representative organizations have attempted to have this law changed without success in the State Legislature. This has principally been as a result of a strong lobbying effort by the Plaintiffs Trial Lawyers Bar Association. You have recently been receiving reports, both from your Cities and on behalf of the Sanitation District, pointing out to the crisis market relating to the availability of and cost for purchase of liability insurance. While there are other factors leading to this crisis market, the continued exposure to legal responsibility on a disproportionate basis is nevertheless one item that must be taken into consideration by the insurance underwriters when they attempt to project their operating profit or loss for issuing insurance. Again, in this Session of the Legislature, there are several Bills pending on this subject, some being considerably stronger than others, and it would appear that with the public awareness of the 1 i ab i 1 i ty ins u r a· n c e c r i s i s , that th i s may be the best t i me ever to successfully obtain the needed legislation in Sacramento. ' • • Fiscal Policy Committee Page 2 April 1, 1985 Accordingly, it is recommended that the Committee recommend to the Board of Directors the adoption of a Resolution urging the support of the various legislative Bills that will ·provide needed liability relief to the public agencies. A very active effort should be made to contact the Orange County delegation of representatives to urge their support of these measures. TLW :pj cc: Mr. J.W. Sylvester Mr. G. Streed Miss R. Brown J· /} '7 _} W:ima-uc{ ff ~. / Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel .. RESOLUTION NO. 85-68 URGING ADOPTION OF SENATE BILL 75 RELATING TO LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR PUBLIC AGENCIES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS .OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, URGING ADOPTION OF SENATE BILL 75 RELATING TO LIMITATION OF LIABILIY FOR PUBLIC AGENCIES * * * * WHEREAS, the present law in the State of California provides for joint and several liability of co-defendants in matters of liability litigation; and, WHEREAS, the application of the law applying the joint and several liability produces a grossly unfair and inequitable burden upon the public and the taxpayers of the State of Cal if ornia; and, WHEREAS, the taxpayers should be responsible tp make financial remuneration for its negligent acts, but should not be responsible to act as an insurer for the negligent acts of others; and, WHEREAS, the existence of the joint and several liability principle in California has been partially responsible for the existing liability insurance crisis, wherein insurance is either not available or only available at greatly-increased premiums; and, WHEREAS, proposed Senate Bill 7 5 .(Foran) would provide that the public agencies would remain jointly and severally liable to a plaintif,f without regard to respective percentage of fault, but limited solely to the actual special damages incurred by the plaintiff, and would absolve the public agency of liability for -... payment of any general damages beyond their respective proportionate share of negligence; and, WHEREAS, proposed Senate Bill 75 results ·in a fair and equitable allocation of legal responsibility and rights to all parties. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section .l: That the County Sanitat i on Districts of Orange County, California fully support and urge all members of the California State Senate and the California State Assembly to support and vote in favor of Senate Bill 75 when present ed to them for their consideration. Section 2: That copies of this Resolution be sent to all members of the Orange County legislative delegation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Boards of Directors held this · l Gth day of -=·Ap=r=i=l'-------' J.985. TLW :pj ( 2) ,. RESOLUTION NO. 85-69 URGING ADOPTION OF SENATE BILL 639 RELATING TO LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR PUBLIC AGENCIES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11 AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, URGING ADOPTION OF SENATE BILL 639 RELATING TO LIMITATION OF LIABILIY FOR PUBLIC AGENCIES * * * * WHEREAS, the present law in the State of California provides for joint and several liability of co-defendants in matters of liability litigation; and, WHEREAS, the application of the law applying the joint and several liability produces a grossly unfair and inequitable burden upon the public and the taxpayers of the State of California; and, WHEREAS, the taxpayers should be responsible to make financial remuneration for its negligent acts, but should not be responsible to act as an insurer for the negligent acts of others; and, WHEREAS, the existence of the joint and several liability principle in California has been partially responsible for the existing liability insurance crisis, wherein insurance is either not available or only available at greatly-increased premiums; and, WHEREAS, Senate Bill 639 (Carpenter) provides that public agencies shall only be financially responsible for a proportionate amount of the judgment equal to the proportionate amount of r ·esponsibili ty for which they are deemed negligent. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation ·-...... ~ . Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange Count y , California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section i: That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, fully support and urge all members of the California State Senate and the California State Assembly t o support and vote in favor of Senate Bill 639 when presented t o them for their consideration. Section 2: That copies of this Resolution be sent to all members of the Orange County legislative delegation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Bo ards of Directors held this l E>th -day of -""'Ap-=-r:=i=l ____ , J.985 . TLW :pj ( 2A) ,. ~~·~~~'~-~ '\) THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, AND THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ORANGE COAST CO-SPONSOR A SATURDAY, APRIL 20, 1985 9 A.M. • 3 P.M. AT TRANSFER STATION NO. II, HUNTINGTON BEACH ON GOTHARD STREET BETWEEN TALBERT AND ELLIS IN CASE OF RAIN, ROUNDUP WILL BE HELD ON SATURDAY, APRIL 27 SAME TIME, SAME PLACE. TOXICS ROUND-UP DISPOSE OF HOUSEHOLD TOXICS SAFELY! ORIGINAL CONTAINERS PREFERRED THE WORLD IS FULL OF TOXIC WASTE YOUR HOME SHOULDN'T BE Toxic products in your home can endanger your family's health. If misused they can poison you, burn your skin and eyes, or cause allergies and respiratory problems. Children are the most frequent victims of home accidents involving toxics. Toxic products become toxic waste when you want to dispose of them. Many waste products should not be put down the drain or in trash. So we're offering you a safe disposal alternative. DO NOT MIX MATERIALS HOUSEHOLD CLEANERS WOOD PERSERVATIVES PAINT AND PAINT THINNER AUTO AND FURNITURE POLISH CHEMICAL DRAIN CLEANERS FERTILIZERS PESTICIDES WEED KILLERS POOL CHEMICALS MEDICATIONS AND DRUGS HOBBY SUPPLIES PHOTOGRAPHIC CHEMICALS BRING YOUR TOXICS TO: WHEN: Saturday April 20, 1985 TIME: 9 AM -3 PM WHERE: HUNTINGTON BEACH TRANSFER STATION NO. II (on Gothard between Talbert and Ellis) lh.VD ,,, .. ... ST s g ~ ;;: ~ ORANGE COUllTY LOCATION MAP ~ 0 .s 1Mile UAlli NO GASOLINE, MOTOR OIL, OR ANTIFREEZE (CONTACT YOUR LOCAL SERVICE STATION) NO FEE CHARGED (no commercial disposals accepted) For. more information call: County of Orange Hazardous Materials Program 834-8892 WHEN BRINGING PRODUCTS TO THE ROUND-UP BE SURE THAT: •the waste is in its original container. •the containers are sound and not leaking. • the contents of the containers are the same as stated on the label. • the amount of waste per visit does not exceed 5 gallons or 50 pounds. •glass containers are protected from breakage Project Sponsors and Participants: County of Orange HazP"'-i- ous Materials Program; Environmental Health Divisio'w' Health Care Agency; Huntington Beach Fire Department and Explorer Post #563; County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; the League of Women Voters of Orange Coast; Agricultural Commissioner, and Waste Management Pro- gram of General Services Agency. PUBLIC HEARIN; ON DRAFI' ENVIRO~AL lMPACT REFORT FOR JOIN!' WJRKS MASTER PLAN If you wish to speak on the Draft Environrrental Impact RepJrt on the Joint Works Master Plan of Wastewater Treatrrent and DispJsal Facilities, please complete this form and leave on the table. If you wish to sul:mi t written corrments , please subni t them to the Secretary prior to the hearing. ; JOINT CHAIRMAN'S NOTES RE DRAFT EIR HEARING AGENDA ITEM NO. 15 (A) ANNOUNCE THAT THIS IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED BY THE BOARDS FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE JOINT TREATMENT WORKS WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN. A COPY OF THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WAS INCLUDED IN THE DIRECTORS AGENDA PACKAGE FOR TONIGHT. THE PURPOSE OF THIS HEARING IS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIR. I WOULD LIKE TO REMIND YOU THAT IT IS NOT THE INTENT TO RESPOND TO PUBLIC COMMENTARY THIS EVENING, RATHER, FOLLOWING THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING, THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT WILL BE DIRECTED TO ADDRESS THE ORAL PUBLIC COMMENTS IN THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT THAT WILL COME BACK TO THE BOARDS FOR CONSIDERATION, TENTATIVELY AT THE JUNE MEETING. THE RECORD WILL BE HELD OPEN UNTIL MAY lST FOR WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTARY. THE CONSULTANT WILL ALSO BE DIRECTED TO ADDRESS WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED IN THE FINAL EIR. THERE ARE FORMS (PINK) IN THE LOBBY FOR ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. COPIES OF THE DRAFT EIR WERE MAILED TO EACH OF THE CITIES WITHIN THE DISTRICT, THE SANITARY DISTRICTS, AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. IN ALL, THE DRAFT EIR HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO 115 AGENCIES AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES. A COPY OF THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WAS INCLUDED IN THE DIRECTORS AGENDA PACKAGE FOR TONIGHT. IN ADDITION, THE STAFF HAS PERSONALLY CONTACTED THE CITIES OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, HUNTINGTON BEACH, NEWPORT l BEACH AND COSTA MESA, THE CITIES ADJACENT TO THE TREATMENT PLANTS AND OFFERED TO REVIEW TH E DRAFT EI R WITH THEIR STAFF. OUR STAFF AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT MET YESTERDAY WITH THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VA LLEY AND TODAY WITH THE CITY OF ~UNTINGTON BEACH. (1) AT THIS TIME I WILL DECLARE THE HEARING OPEN. (2) BEFORE WE HEAR PUBLIC COMMENTARY, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE DISTRICTS' ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT, K. P. LINDSTROM, TO PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW OF THE DRAFT EIR. (3) CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE WRITTEN COMMENTS SUBMITTED THIS EVENING RELATIVE TO THE DRAFT EIR, IF ANY (ASK SECRETARY). (4) RECOGNIZE ANY PERSONS THAT WO ULD LIKE TO PRESENT ORAL COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIR. ASK THAT EACH PERSON STATE THEI R NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. (5) FOLLOWING ORAL PUBLIC COMMENTARY, DECLARE THE HEARING CLOSED. (B) CONSIDERATION OF MOTION DIRECTING THE EIR CONSULTANT TO ADDRESS THE ORAL PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND ANY WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, AND TO PREPARE A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE JOINT TREATMENT WORKS WASTEWA TER MASTER PLAN AFTER THE CLOSE OF THE WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT PERIO D ON MAY l, 1985. 2 II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS APRIL 10) 1985 -7:30 P.M. ALL DISTRICTS Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (5) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute except and Resolution No. 85-60 from the Board of Supervisors seating Thomas F. Riley as the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and appointing Roger R. Stanton to serve as Active Director o n the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, and appointing Harriett M. Wieder to serve as Alternate Director on each of said Boards. (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts fr om the following re election of mayor , appointment of alternate Director s , and seating new members of the Boards: (*Mayor) City/Agency Distr ict(s) Active Director Alternate Director Villa Park 2 Carol H. Kawanami Wayne Silzel* Costa Mesa Sanitary Dist. 6 James Wahner James B. Ga llacher ALL DISTRICTS (16) (a) Consideration of mot ion to receive, file and deny the cla i m submitted by Southern California Edison Company dated February 4, 1985, in the amount of $1,933.85 for alleged damages to their faciliti es incurred in connection with construction of Paving and Drainage at Treatme nt Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator, General Counsel, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action (b) Consideration of motion authorizing employment of Charles A. Jacks as Assistant Laboratory Director at Step 5 of Range No. 1066G ($3390 /month) REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN APRIL 10, 1985 !) PROPOSED DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL RESEARCH PROJECT. THE SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION HELD HEARINGS ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL CLEAN WATER ACT IN LATE MARCH. TESTIMONY WAS LIMITED TO A FEW NATIONAL GROUPS, INCLUDING THE LEAGUE OF CITIES AND AMSA. HOWEVER, SENATOR CRANSTON DID APPEAR BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE AND TESTIFIED IN FAVOR OF THE DISTRICTS' PROPOSED DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE RESEARCH PROJECT WHICH, AS YOU . KNOW, IS A JOINT EFFORT OF OUR DISTRICTS, CAL TECH AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION THAT WOULD BE CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF EPA. l HAVE WRITTEN SENATOR CRANSTON ON BEHALF OF THE BOARDS THANKING HIM FOR HIS SUPPORT OF OUR PROJECT. 2) TREATMENT PLANT ODOR CONTROL PROGRAM. You HAVE BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING, UNDER AGENDA ITEM No. 9(E), THE FIRST PHASE OF THE TREATMENT PLANT ODOR CONTROL PROGRAM, RECENTLY ADOPTED BY THE JOINT BOARDS. THIS ITEM IS TO HIRE AN ENGINEERING FIRM TO DESIGN THE NECESSARY REHABILITATION WORK ON THE REMAINING PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS PRIOR TO COVERING THEM. WE HAVE INCLUDED IN YOUR AGENDA FOLDERS A COPY OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ·SCHEDULE (GOLDENROD) TO COMPLETE THE PROGRAM. STAFF 1 .-.. --... HAS ADVISED ME THAT RFP's FOR THE NEXT PHASE, THE DESIGN OF THE COVERS AND SCRUBBERS, WILL BE ISSUED THIS WEEK. THE SELECTION COMMITTEE WILL SCREEN THE ENGINEERING FIRMS OVER THE NEXT SEV ERAL WEEKS AND A RECOMMENDATION WILL BE MADE TO THE JOINT BOARDS FOR A CONTRACT TO DESIGN THE COVERS AND SCRUBBING SYSTEMS AT BOTH PLANTS AT THE JUNE MEETING. 3) UPCOMING MEETINGS. ANNOUNCE /CALL THE FOLLOWING MEETINGS: A) DISTRICT No. 5 ADJOURNED MEETING -TENATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17TH AT 5:00 P.M. -NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL. B) FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING -TUESDAY, APRIL 23RD AT 4:30 P.M. C) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING -WEDNESDAY, APRIL 24TH AT 5:30 P.M. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND: D /( RUTHELYN DONALD SALTARELLI ~ *~ AND RICHARD POLIS OR OR det~ D) WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ASK THE DIRECTORS OF DISTRICT No. l IF IT WOULD BE CONVENIENT TO MEET WEDNESDAY, APRIL 24TH AT 4:00 P.M., IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, TO REVIEW AN UPDATE OF THEIR LONG-RANGE FINANCIAL PLAN AND TO CONSIDER AN ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST AN INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER. 2 MEETING DATE_....,.A....,p ..... r1 ... ·1...__,1-.;;o ..... o....;;;1;.;;.9..;;;;.a.;;..s __ TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 & ·13 ~-----~-----....;....--~~~~~ DIST~ICi i JOINT BOARDS ( C~ANK) I I I I I I I I HANSON I. I I I I ~ (LUXEMSOukGER). GRI SET,,,,,, a:=- (~ENNEDY),,,, ,,SALTARELLI •• ~ (wt EDER), •••••• STANTON ••••• a-- DISTRICT L \NORBY) I I •• I. I .CATLIN ••• I I·~ (OVERHOLT),,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,, .....-- (NEWTON),,,,,,,BLiCK,,,,,,,,-;::::;---- (NELSON),,,,,,,COOPER,,,,,,-.::::::;---- (LUXEMBOURGER). GRI SET I. It t .~ -- \MAHONEY),, ,,,,HOLMBERG,,,,~ (SJLZEL),,,,,, .KAWANAMJ,,,,~ (SCOTT),,,,,,,,NEAL,,,,,,,,~:::: ___ ( c UL v ER } • • • I t I I p ERR y I • • • • t I -ti£: (BEYER),,,,,,,,SMITH,,,,,,,~::::: \WIEDER). I I I I •• STANTON, I I I I a... (&EVERAGE),, ,,,WISNER,,,,,,~::::: DISTRICT 3 (OVERHO!T),,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,, .,,,,,.,-__ <coo PER ••••••• uetserJa •••• •-lt:::: __ (THOMAS ,,,,,,,BAILEY,,,,,,-l!.!:::: __ lRISNER),,,,,,,BROWNELL,,.,~ (NORbY) I I I I. I. t CATLIN. I. I.·~:::: (PERRY J. t. I I. I .CULVER. I I I I·~ - lJARRELLJ •• t. t I GRIFFIN •• t •• ~-­ (LUXEMBOURGER} I GR I SET. I. I •• ~ --lMAHON~Y) •••••• HOLM&ERG •••• ~ --- (SCOTT) t •••• It t NEAL •• I I. I I·~ (FINLAYSON),,,,OLSON,,,,,,,_l.:::::""':::: (KANEL),,,,,,,,PARTIN,,,,,.~--­ (SEIDEL),,,,,,,POLIS ••••••~ ____ (SIRIANJJ,,,,,,SAPIEN,,,,,,~ __ _ (WIEDER),,,, ,,,STANTON,,.,,~ ___ (LANDEH),,,, ,,,SYLVIA,,,,,,~--- DISTRICT 5 <cox) •••••••••• ~ •••••••• ~ ___ __ <cox) •• l ••••••• MAURER •••••• -1=:::::: ----(WIEDERJ,,,,,,,STANTON,,.,,~ ____ __ ~ ~DISTRICT 6 ! GALLACHER). It. WAHNER •••••• ()_, ----- COX),, l'' '''''PLUMMER ••••• ~ --____ WIEDERJ,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,~ _____ __ DISTRICT 7 (BEYER)t••••••1SMITH,,,,,,.~ ______ _ (MILLERJ,,,,,,,SILLS.,,,,,,~ ____ (KENNEDYJ,,,,,,EDGAR,,,,,,,~----:::: \LUXEMBOURGER). GRI SET ••• I. t -a::;;-__ -- (COX)., •••••••• MAURER •••••• ~ ___ ____ (WIEDER),,.,,,,STANTON,,,,,~ __ (GREEN),,,,,,,,WAHNER,,,,,,_ ~-____ _ DISTRICT 11 (MANDIC),,,,,,,BAILEY,,,,,,~ ____ _ (WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,.~ ____ _ (FINLEY),,.,,,,THOMAS,,,,,,~ _____ _ DISTRICT 13 I BEYER)l,,,,,,,SMITH,,,,,,,~ ____ __ WISNER ,,,,,,,BEVERAGE,,,,~ ____ ____ NELSON •t•••11COOPER11•••·~ ____ ____ OVERHO~TJ,,,,,ROTH.,,,,,,,-1::::::' ____ ____ WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,~ ___ ____ 4/10/85 (THOMAS/MANDIC) •• BAILEY. I I I I·~ (WISNER),,, Ill ••• BEVERAGE. I II ............ (RISNER),,,, ••••• BROWNELL. I II ~ (NEWTON), I I I I I I I I BUCK. I I I I I··~ (NORBY)\ ••• I. I I I I CATLIN. I I I I·~== (NELSONJ ••••••••• COOPER ••• I II ~ (PERRY) •••••••••• CULVER. I II··~~­ (KENNEDY) •• I I I •• I ED.GAR I I I I I I I ............ -- (JARRELL) •• II t•• .GRIFFIN •• ,,,---;;::::::: -- (LUXEMBOURGERJ,, .GRISET,,, ,,,'(5::° (CRANK) I •• I I. I I I I HANSON •• I I I.~ <cox) ••• , •••••••• ~ •••••••• ~ -- (MAHONEYJ,, ,,,,,,HOLMBERG,.,,~ -- (~S ILZEL) I I I I •• I I I KAWANAM I. I. I~ --cox). t •, •••••••• MAURER ••• ,. ,_k:::'.'.'"'== SCOTT JI I. I. I I. I I NEAL I I. I I I I·~ -- (COOPER). •••••••• rtetaeu •••••• - (FINLAYSON),,,,,,QLSQN,, ,, ,,,a::;::;--- (KANEL), ••••••,,,PARTIN,,, ••• ~ -- !CULVER),,,,,,,,,PERRY,,, •• II ~ -- cox) •• t • •••••••• PLUMMER ••••• ~ == SEIDELJ,,,,,,,,,POLIS,,,,, ··~ (OVERHOLTJ,,,,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,,~ --- (KENNEDY). I • I •• I I SAL TAR ELL I I I ~ -- (SIR I AN I) •••••••• SAP I EN •••••• ~ --- (MILLER),,,,,,,,,SJLLS,,, II •• ~ -- (BEYER)~·········SMITH ••••••• ~ ---(WIEDER ,,,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,C:C:: --- (LANDER ,,,,,,,,,SYLVIA,,,,,.~ --- (FINLEY) ••• I. I.' l THOMAS. I I I •• ~ (GREEN/GALLACHERJWAHNER,, ,,,,1:1'"" (BEVERAGE>. I. I. I I WISNER. I I I I·~ STAFF: OTHERS: 3YLVESTER ••• ~ CLARKE,,,,,,~ DAWES,,,,,,·~ ANDERSON,,,·~ BUTLER,,,,,,~ BROWN,,,,,,,~ BAKER,,,,,,,~ KYLE,,,,,,,,~ YOUNG,,,,,,,~ VON LANGEN ~ WINSOR,,,,,,~ STREED,,,.,,~ C~SON,,,,,~ ~-.-. ~ WOODRUFF •••• ~ ATKINS,,,,,,~ HOHENER,,,,, __ HOWARD,,,,,, ___ HUNT,,,,,,,,~ KEITH,,,,,,,~ KNOPF I •• I. I. ,_....., LE BLANC,,,, ___ LINDSTROM ••• ~ LYNCH,,,,,,, __ MARTINSON,,, __ PEARCE,,,,,, __ __ PLEASE SIGN IN -APRIL 10 , 1 985 JOINT MTG . I • NAME (Please Print) I ~ ?. L1N])sruM .5uja r.N--t;, ~/:.1;ns e i c~ ~k)opf-_ ... Y~ s~1._ . K<-z~{t : · ~·-~..ie /J~ &J~.;J ~ 1tJ f t/ C'7't jc~~-v?. I ~¥~·-,, C J,~~ ... ... .. -1 .. 1 -. A. J • 1 . -.c ~ -•IM • ... n ~ .. . .. . r •"""I ....... , .. .,. . . .. . . '-... .. -' .... I ' ..... : J .......... ' - I :JllA • -·'· • ... ' . .. ... - • L~ J • ·:r. .. 1111( .,:_ ' . . J ., 1 1• • FIRM/ORGANIZATION /AGENCY \c \ p. LI NDSTiUJM r I\ 55o c ' Kt?U1 K.R... '{ Wvt1d_~'./Jf • ~c:Y~ c~{t u l~ ~~(~~ ~~ @:~. ~'- I ~\..;~ <!, ~M .J--rc-;; H· fe/J/~~ ~vvet( j/),16,.z__ Pf:~ f1,,1 (}Ts I Sia /1 ! a - ... • ~ .... ~ .. .{ .. , ~ -i .. l l .. n- ---.... ~ . ,,, 1 .. " ,,... ,_j -• .r ' .. ... ... - ... I \ iJ. .~. ~ APRIL 10 , 1 985 JOINT MEETING NOTES t7(a) -Report of the Joint Chairman See attached notes . Re item i2, Mr. Edgar added that Lee & Ro will be designing all projects simultaneously. We will have a contract with a consultant and a contractor for the covers and a third contract for the scrubbers and duct work. The difficult part is to get the duct in place . It has to be coordinated very carefully. He referred to the goldenrod insert in the Directors' folders which is a schedule for all of this work for rehabilitation, covers, scrubbers and ducts. He said it should be very gratifying to see that all of this will be done by March 1987 . Chairman Edgar also reported that District 3 just approved minutes of the i r adjourned meeting at which they adopted a policy re payment for rehabilitation of manholes which includes a sunset aspect in it. He read sections from the minutes relative to the length of time for completion of the rehabilition versus the percent of payment to be made. Said he thought that was a very healthy way to address the issue. He also recommended that this same policy be referred to the Executive Committee for consideration of a recommendation that all the other Districts support and adopt this policy also. i7(b) -Report of the General Manager The General Manager reported that since EPA and the Reg ional Water Quality Control Board gave final approval to the Districts' NPDES Permit which became effective April 1st, two of the municipal measures--suspended solids and biological oxygen demand--are better than required . S .S . discharge is about 25% better than the standard and B .O.D. is about 20% better . He then reported that we recent l y app roved a joint effort regarding a tria l toxic round-up . Mr . Sylvester referred to the information in the Directors' folders in connection with this round-up . It will be held on April 20th. He added that there is also some information in the folders on toxics and how they should be handled . He indicated that Directors s hould see Hilary Baker if they would like additional copies . Mr . Sylvester stated that the Board may reme mber that in this year's budget they included the posit ion of Public Information Officer . He then introduced Corinne Clawson who was just hired to fill that position. He indicated that she had a degree in jour nalism and public relations. Has worked for the L.A Times and a smaller newspape r . The General Manager also reported that a new Directors ' orientation meeting is scheduled for May 29th . It is the fifth Wedn esday of the month so hopefully it will not conflict with other City responsibilities. It is also after Daylight Savings Time is i n effect so they could tour the plant during the daylight hours . The meeting will start about 5:30 p .m. with a light dinner . Directors will be briefed on organizational matters as well as financing and long-term planning . Staff will be forwarding more information shortly. Re Supplemental item il6(a), Mr. Sylves ter reported that we have received a claim from Southern California Edi son for damages r esu lting from a contractor working on some paving and drainage work at Plant 2 . The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive and file the claim and refer to the appropriate parties for processing . Re Supplemental item il6(b), the General Mana ge r reported that part of our new NPDES Permit requires a greatly expanded effort re ocean monitoring . Last year the the Board added the position of Assistant Laboratory Director . The man that has been se l e cted has a Ph.D. and s taff would like to offer him the position at Step 5. Uner the current salary resolution , staff on ly has authority to offer up to Step 3. Would like to hire him at Step 5. i7(c) -Report of the General Counsel Torn Woodruff reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee's Report had been placed in the Directors' folders. In this report there are two resolutions that the Committee supported re Senate Bills 75 and 639 re limitation of liablity to public agencies. He said he was sure the Directors' had been briefed on these by their respective cities. Senator Paul Carpenter's Bill 639 is the best bill but probably doesn't stand much of a chance. It says you only pay in proportion to your liability. He added that probably during this legislature we will have the best chance in 10 years to get a bill through. They have been dumped every year. This year with the insurance industry crisis and major verdicts having been handed down, the people who have opposed this in the past have changed their position. The Foran Bill is a compromise but is still good. The General Counsel then reported that a couple of months ago we refused to accept a late claim. They went to Superior Court and filed a petition and we successfully argued against it. One of the contractor's got hurt on the construction job and he had workers' comp. ill(b) -Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals for design of Administration building addition Joint Chairman Edgar commented that for this particular matter, the Selection Committee had been expanded to include Directors Culver, Neal and Partin, besides the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman, as this is more than a routine task. we want to have someone who really understands our goals and objectives and thought an expanded committee would be very worthwhile. #15 -Public Hearing on Draft EIR re Joint Works Master Plan See attached comments given by the Joint Chairman. #15(a) (2) -Report of consultant, Kris Lindstrom The Joint Chairman introduced Kris Lindstrom. He gave a slide presentation to the Board and gave a brief overview of the EIR and its contents. The Master Plan contains a $113 million expenditure for new and improved facilities planned for the Joint Works. He then reviewed what a Master Plan is. He said a new Master Plan is prepared about every five years for each District and they do a Joint Master Plan for projects for the next 20-year period. He listed some of the Joint Master Plans which were completed in 1947, 1966 and 1983. The 1983 Plan is the one for which the EIR is now being done. There have been several special studies such as the Malcolm Pirnie Odor Study, Digester Gas Study, Lighting Study and others to enhance the Master Plan and provide more detail. These are used for the 20-year study to lay out the schedule and decide how to optimize the space. These are also based on environmental standards and air pollution control regulations. He referred to the Executive Summary of the Draft EIR included with the Executive Committee material. Kris then reviewed the environmental impact assessment, estimated cost of projects, and impacts associated with projects. He also reviewed possible impacts such as excavation (some required for new headworks and ocean outfall booster station); air quality (will result in a net reduction of 60% of the pollutants due to centralized combusion system with electric motors); visual (showed pictures of outfall booster station at Plant 2 and new headworks at Plant 1--no major facilities will be highly visible. Most visible will be a 20-foot extension of existing tower. Many things will be enhanced with new landscaping and a wall.); effect on biotic resources (will have to take out a some of the trees but are trying to save as many as possible); transportation (will have up to 100 construction employees during the peak construction period and will have many cement trucks over a 2-3 month -2- period--about 500 trucks. The Districts have taken some action to look at a new entry gate at Plant No. 1 with direct access and signal right off the freeway. Will work very closely with staff re traffic managment plan); noise (there has not been a great deal of problems with noise. More concerned about traffic noise. Sound barriers and baffling walls have been built into prelimiany designs .); energy (centralized power generation facilities will make the Districts more self-sufficient than they already are. Will pay for themselves within less than a decade); odor (will reduce sulfide emissions by greater than 90%); land use (the Districts encompass 211 acres and the new facilities will take 3 additional acres); chemical use (will increase but will have different chemicals than those now in use . Now an extensive amount of chlorine is used. Will use ferric chloride, caustic soda and activated carbon); water quality (will have a 10% or less increase in flow and the Districts are 20-25% below standard requirements. We feel we will be able to assure compliance with permit and continue with industrial waste source control for the reduction of tox icants). The Joint Chairman commended the staff on the physical features of t he planned facilities and for incorporating odor concerns and centralized power generation. He stated that comments will be accepted until May 1st. Director Bailey asked if they would be getting a report from the me eting held at the cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley on this EIR? The Ge neral Manager replied that the Districts' staff and consultant have met with representatives of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach and he suggested t ha t the consultant include any comments and responses to those c omme nts in the final EIR . He added that the staff and consultant would be happy to meet with her at her convenience with regard to this EIR . il6(c) -All Districts Other Business Director Sam Cooper presented Resolution No. 84-9-85 and T-shirt on behalf of the City of Brea to Director Don Roth for being such a good sport with regard to the newspaper article re his not being invited to sit at the head table at the Angels' baseball season opening luncheon. -3- REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN APRIL 10, 1985 1) PROPOSED DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL RESEARCH PROJECT. THE SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION HELD HEARINGS ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL CLEAN WATER ACT IN LATE MARCH. TESTIMONY WAS LIMITED TO A FEW NATIONAL GROUPS, INCLUDING THE LEAGUE OF CITIES AND AMSA. HOWEVER, SENATOR CRANSTON DID APPEAR BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE AND TESTIFIED IN FAVOR OF THE DISTRICTS' PROPOSED DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE RESEARCH PROJECT WHICH, AS YOU KNOW, IS A JOINT EFFORT OF OUR DISTRICTS, CAL TECH AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION THAT WOULD BE CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF EPA. I HAVE WRITTEN SENATOR CRANSTON ON BEHALF OF THE BOARDS THANKING HIM FOR HIS SUPPORT OF OUR PROJECT. 2) TREATMENT PLANT ODOR CONTROL PROGRAM. You HAVE BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING, ·UNDER AGENDA ITEM No. 9( E), THE FIRST PHASE OF THE TREATMENT PLANT ODOR CONTROL PROGRAM, RECENTLY ADOPTED BY THE JOINT BOARDS. THIS ITEM IS TO HIRE AN ENGINEERING FIRM TO DESIGN THE NECESSARY REHABILITATION WORK ON THE REMAINING PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS PRIOR TO COVERING THEM. WE HAVE INCLUDED IN YOUR AGENDA FOLDERS A COPY OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE (GOLDENROD) TO COMPLETE THE PROGRAM. STAFF 1 HAS ADVISED ME THAT RFP's FOR THE NEXT PHASE, THE DESIGN OF THE ~COVERS AND SCRUBBERS, WILL BE ISSUED THIS WEEK. THE SELECTION COMMITTEE WILL SCREEN THE ENGINEERING FIRMS OVER THE .NEXT SEVERAL WEEKS AND A RECOMMENDATION WILL BE MADE TO THE JOINT BOARDS FOR A CONTRACT TO DESIGN THE COVERS AND SCRUBBING SYSTEMS AT BOTH PLANTS AT THE JUNE MEETING. 3) UPCOMING MEETINGS. A~NOUNCE/CALL THE FOLLOWING MEETINGS: A) DISTRICT No. 5 ADJOURNED MEETING -TENATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17TH AT 5:00 P.M. -NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL. B) FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING -TUESDAY, APRIL 23RD AT 4:30 P.M. C) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING -WEDNESDAY, APRIL 24TH AT 5:30 P.M. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING TO ATTEND: o) ----------•. -----..__ RUTHEL YN PLUMMER 1 AND RICHARD POLIS OR OR YL-SAP-IEN~ ~~~~\N~ WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ASK THE DIRECTORS OF DISTRICT No. l IF IT WOULD BE CONVENIENT TO MEET WEDNESDAY, APRIL 24TH AT 4:00 P.M., IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING, TO REVIEW AN UPDATE OF THEIR LONG-RANGE FINANCIAL PLAN AND TO CONSIDER AN ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST AN INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER. 2 /~ l JOINT CHAIRMAN'S NOTES RE DRAFT EIR HEARING AGENDA ITEM NO . 15 (A) ANNOUNCE THAT THIS IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED BY THE BOARDS FOR A PUB LIC HEARING ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE JOINT TREATMENT WORKS WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN. A COPY OF THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WAS INCLUDED IN THE DIRECTORS AGENDA PACKAGE FOR TONIGHT . THE PURPOSE OF THIS HEARING IS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIR . I WOULD LIKE TO REMIND YOU THAT IT IS NOT THE INTENT TO RESPOND TO PUBLIC COMMENTARY THIS EVENING, RATHER, FOLLOWING THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING, ~ THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT WILL BE DIRECTED TO ADDRESS THE ORAL PUBLIC COMMENTS IN THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT THAT WILL COME BACK TO THE BOARDS FOR CONSIDERATION, TENTATIVELY AT THE JUNE MEETING. THE RECORD WILL BE HELD OPEN UNTIL MAY !ST FOR WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTARY. THE CONSULTANT WILL ALSO BE DIRECTED TO ADDRESS WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED IN THE FINAL EIR. THERE ARE FORMS (PINK) IN THE LOBBY FOR ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. COPIES OF THE DRAFT EIR WERE MAIL ED TO EACH OF THE CITIES WITHIN THE DISTRICT, THE SANITARY DISTRICTS, AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE . IN ALL, THE DRAFT EIR HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO 115 AGENCIES AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES. A COPY OF THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WAS INCLUDED IN THE DIRECTORS AGENDA PACKAGE FOR TONIG~T. IN ADDITION, THE STAFF HAS PERSONALLY CONTACTED THE CITIES OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, HUNTINGTON BEACH, NEWPORT l BEACH AND COSTA MESA, THE CITIES ADJACENT TO THE TREATMENT PLANTS AND OFFERED TO REVIEW THE DRAFT EIR WITH THEIR STAFF. OUR STAFF AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT MET YESTERDAY WITH THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY AND TODAY WITH THE CITY OF .HUNTINGTON BEACH. (1) AT THIS TIME I WILL DECLARE THE HEARING OPEN. (2) BEFORE WE HEAR PUBLIC COMMENTARY, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE DISTRICTS' ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT, K. P. LINDSTROM, TO PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW OF THE DRAFT EIR. (3) CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE WRITTEN COMMENTS SUBMITTED THIS EVENING RELATIVE TO THE DRAFT EIR, IF ANY (ASK SECRETARY). (4) RECOGNIZE ANY PERSONS THAT WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT ORAL COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIR. ASK THAT EACH PERSON STATE THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. (5) FOLLOWING ORAL PUBLIC COMMENTARY, DECLARE THE HEARING CLOSED. (B) CONSIDERATION OF MOTION DIRECTING THE EIR CONSULTANT TO ADDRESS THE ORAL PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS AND ANY WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, AND TO PREPA RE A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT l REPORT FOR THE JOINT TREATMENT WORKS WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN AFTE R THE CLOSE OF THE WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ON MAY 1, 1985. 2 ( r )-JeE fl-ff: oF __, ('__ --:Jl,M.1r Nf W--~ -~ 't ~ ? ~ -])o~J) f f!oJecr--00 /J'ft~ -- ~ -w=rftv; f/14111 ~,J (e>lfJ{l Je;,t,),j.-1?017/ f~ j -WI~ oF-Cov6-s Jsck~ I />tµ.rwe-i'./L .' -SC(JrJluu;2( G:icDt.UcD)-/.---.1116 (JY{(WF l~ ~187 - ~ Pl Yr. -;--)f (--, 17 -~! t1 ·-,A) 5' (!( 7'( f#u-- fr<!_-'/ ~ 1 /Jf'l. 'Lj I sf)\;;) (rt kt&(. -/}Jt:P I 'f 2-4 / ) : !>o II ·-f:if171l:!-1 J ~T.1. -~ t'KtZ...? -~r? -,Jo ~Mtl -ott- i) M#>il>t.n.t.fit;{/C t/o 'fa ."J-f /.t.aS j b> "fo z ')--JU10> j &:> ;(; 3 7-16 H<>' / -1-8 ___,,.. f' o 7o (?>tsr. 3 fot-u:v) ~ ~ 7D /¥EC ~ N~r /),(_ff;. ( 1f1 /ri~ J 7 [-.,) ~ or:-~µ - (j) EfA IM cJ. -f C:P..ffltr m /J-f ta.1 d--Bo]) ; 2o % > ST1> ; .SS: .-2-13? _sn) (l) Tll\f.tr_;j ~f-~~fl-. ·2.cj> -7-3fli -7JJziH'.:f~Rh!-D - (],) fro --.:11Jrt.<) G co<Lt,JNe / c )lA Nn<TlH'-11>w - ( t) }1!r1f -i-9 _sft-watJ~~ ---$-14:~' emr~;J / ~ 3-:i ·--uc 11r :Prv111:Jl - r;k,/fi~ jetJ&~ + f1-1-: ~ TO\J.f-- (?J So~ (°f)/iotJ -PiJJ-/f1 /C!.CMH - lf) ~r: Urf> ~L-ft..D-l~,,1~~J~> -~ <- 1-(_() &o~ ~ 0L-~uM?o-J5. I ~D 7)1 bs9 -/.J1'-tf7#7~ o~ /uJ.u..c.. l,Hta.11,,i~ -f?c. /41rollS Go~D7'7~SU:/f~'¥t,LLS / i ~ofeAift;;> -f~7Nfs--~ tTI::M..-1rJ1-- Ml·) "r;f,J.. tJ;.. vtJ-jn~ JJt!in..-/ t-<UIMD f'A-1.r,~ -ttr l'ir µ.c#trcer-: @p!fd> .k1m7,,,.l C."f ([~ tf/_t(- v3YA '1-flm;Jif -~ ( b J S:;J.-M,~ uJ v-1-L q le.) t t ?__ -lLN A-J (_JJ if~ -1/ (e_) 't • I/ (*) (~ 1( 1 L 1·3 (( /I J_t -lb) (i) -~ ktG~~ [i) '! 8-IJsrt_ J:J~~u::-/ftv/'eii~ -uJAJ « ~ (c_) '( I I c<J~) ,, (/ J5\q_j -f~l-{L-~,J&,-~ve fv.l>~Lt (,o.-.ut-ctV?r - -~ f;iJLr-Tc_ 1Jorr;;s - (),) ~ /.:[~ -kit-~¥-¥€sur,e.s~ -IGi!c~ #(w r-Pl -J.cl/ -L_, ~au {)t'-· '. fq-;j_ + ~l4f1-6-AAfiG--s. -CtN~flcf!v..if,&f. - -{)[£..(5,4%cGnLfl<t-=? [c-,.Jrz_ f&itL ~ ~ ~ ~(~~t~.S@ ~!Nf~- r f u-, 2---! ,1)er) ~r({'L f-/h(offt:--{_ ~W-~N'j> -A-«-f~~ N~ ~ fiA~ @._ fu-:i..- f /..<I c.u~.fl... ~ s~ fa u'r 4)..,s 1,;j fuw~) .I>(b?:: 1ero of./.fi,,S ~ -fAs.1~ ~ .... CtJVfML f~t~.f­ -~ft/> j-{H_ W.f -fJeJ /!AJ!fa,/ti) httL.. - M/P-iv.Jo~f~5 "1-vufr.w .itttrrrl;:) 1--7~]. ho.JS"~"' rA<J,fl,{)r.s.rr -==-'? :::ro,,.'Jr oJ~fi.cJJ-7' · fJ~f*t NltCf?l,:3 ~ ldy P-,$. - ~ikp ('v 1'1ff f lC I I) v tfT5 T /lJ I c. ·~ U</t.-. Sr-MP'{ IM Uef1) M.Mf 1.1•ttrnJt CG"1.s . St?H>( - ~ /fvr:lw6 si'Ace '()fnrr 1Tfi7fo~ fJr nr: lt,g f IJp1'tDjoPm-/ ~1-A.<lc,pw . ;Jts fc-1,,v.rr- -bV VT/}L ks~tf5 MfiJ13 ) /A_t Y?b tm~ ~~SI ~hrz//e ..J:tr;AJ& / ..:}'/#Jt /lPC/J17o)J ~ f.AuL- -f ?1 / f{e_ /-o Pl/ ~/)T, PtAa!1 - -. lf'1 D ~ tJtt»s ( PH-0 T 2./ ;1,p I 4'11/t'( T tfJ = ~ 4"1 ---f;,J Vss;. .f 1 ffiµ. tf-s.. / ti{fi kr-1 ns -= ~ H .t11 -ffNr7n__ M 177& l}f?o~ ; o.Do-{!.../ciiJrl_ tGJ / t>!~ tMllov~rtS := / ?/11 1 -~~p w~/ ~if--qWtt--(x.~1-t/,;J-.rU / flc;tr/trto~/faP,fe/S - r;. J-1 I ~ck:p -~@ j ;f/>Z> L_ lfck;£ -~ S~ /P.e> ~17JcJ.-fii-e Jo11./ 4--iU.e ~J.1~) NE(' kf;t).qr~ o'F f;u"~ fi.f .cEiiR ~?~ 7-7 Gpfoltjj - -/1c:n;..tq~ oF-!fwt fioDsnJL..f-t"/JnuJ -2-P 'CJ(.rtfJ~~ uf-+vvlr~ ~~-J.)l;V l:MtJSCftfr.J6 - -kfr_Mr rf4 -e.:loo ~fr. £)'1/c.~1~ + eoJckw ~ : @ \co TAc-/£5 -1~ 0 /(oj - -,d:t0rJw-t:417osV -,.fo)A) (.~-fr.,rr;J_ - .-~ ~u_~; /7s~A>l. tPlnl":. -/Jot~ f.ltr76M?o~ - -§.i&y ; f~}Aa:. u)/r~ (o y;a ; ?JDe/r' -1o 1o T _ -tfk'11A.r()ftt._ ~ -JJ{)A.of( 1-i ~l;_ ~ j Fe.~&. t -D1tt;;l.nLGtts. t.~ -7U1$'1:.Wr.JJ.1oJf - <-1cj>o/-v /NC~~ j/0 fiou.) j ~~~~ cJ, W ~t= tr)irfoL -t-fJDJJ -T~bv-s.rttfl4L 1*cJ ~TAI. - ]>!:1~ IJ~ - -ID~~ (21;._~ : ;Jo w~ f!.Jiµ~rt YG1- -)o ~ 4 .,__- -tw&ef ~ MM-( f.~1 -tu>~ or= ~t<~ U{).j,4c_ C{)M~r /t!ttoD - -wii-tnttJ Mttf~ ~ C<nr?j> t-~; .... Trr. rg;j- ..._; jt-{J-W-. ~feL-8tert ~ ~<3L - ct Vi~!. i -/J-f4t uJ foic_ JM~? I .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NO~. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, AND 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON APRIL lOJ 1985 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS A VENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. ~ 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 of Orange County, California, was held on April 10, 1985, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 11 and 13 as follows: DISTRICT NO. 1: DISTRICT NO. 2: DISTRICT NO. 3: DISTRICT NO. 5: DISTRICT NO. 6: DISTRICT NO. 7: DISTRICT NO. 11: DISTRICT NO. 13: ACTIVE DIRECTORS x Robert Hanson, Chairman -a-Dan Griset, Chairman pro tern x Don Saltarelli _a_Roger Stanton x Buck Catlin, Chairman x Don Roth, Chairman pro tern _x_Richard Buck x Sam Cooper a Dan Griset a John Holmberg x Carol Kawanami _x_J ames Neal x Bob Perry x Don Smith a Roger Stanton x Gene Wisner x Don Roth, Chairman --Carrey Nelson, Chairman pro tern x Ruth Bailey x Oscar Brownell x Buck Catlin x Norman Culver x Don Griff in a Dan Griset a John Holmberg x James Neal -x-Richard Olson x Richard Partin x Richard Polis a Sal Sapien a Roger Stanton x Charles Sylvia Evelyn Bart, Chairman x Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tem _a_Roger s tan ton a James Wahner, Chairman x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tern _a_Roger s tan ton x Don Smith, Chairman -a-David Sills, Chairman pro tern -x-Ricbard Edgar -a-Dan Griset x Philip Maurer a Roger Stanton a James Wahner x Ruth Bailey, Chairman -a-Roger Stanton, Chairman pro tern x John ~homas x Don Smith, Chairman x Michael J. Beverage _x_Sam Cooper _x_Don Roth _a_Roger Stanton -2- ALTERNATE DI RECTORS Orma Crank __ Robert Luxembourger Ursula Kennedy Harriett Wieder __ Chris Norby __ E. Llewellyn Overholt, .Jr. Arthur Newton --Carrey Nelson Robert Luxembourger Bill Mahoney Wayne Silzel __ George Scott __ Norman Culver Gene Beyer Harriett Wieder __ Michael J. Beverage __ H. Llewellyn Overholt x Sam Cooper John Thomas __ Joyce Risner __ Chris Norby __ Bob Perry __ James T. Jarrell Robert Luxembourger Bill Mahoney George Scott --Bruce Finlayson John Kanel Norma Seidel --Jean Siriani --Harriett Wieder David Lander x John Cox, Jr. John Cox, Jr. __ Harriett Wieder James B. Gallacher --John Cox, Jr. Harriett Wieder Gene Beyer Sally Anne Miller Ursula Kennedy ---Robert Luxembourger Bill Agee __ Harriett Wieder ___ Harry Green Robert P. Mandie, Jr. Harriett Wieder __ Ruth Finley Gene Beyer Gene Wisner --~Carrey Nelson __ H. Llewellyn Overholt --~Harriet Wieder 4/10/85 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Blake Anderson, Bill Butler, Gary Streed, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Ray Young, Richard von Langen, Chuck Winsor, Robert Ooten, Corinne Clawson Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Suzanne Atkins, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf, Kris Lindstrom, Phil Stone, Peer Swan, Milo Keith, Dan Hoppy * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 1 This being the 10th day of April, 1985, at Adjournment of meeting by Secretary 7:30 p.m., being the time and place for the Regular Meeting of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District No. 1 was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. DISTRICT 6 This being the 10th day of April, 1985, at Adjournment of meeting by Secretary 7:30 p.m., being the time and place for the R~gular Meeting of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District No. 6 was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. DISTRICT 7 This being the 10th day of April, 1985, at -....,; Adjournment of meeting by Secretary 7:30 p.m., being the time and place for the \.,I Regular Meeting of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District kNo. 7 was thereupon adjourned by the· Secretary. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Receive and file minute excerpt and Resolution No. 85-60 from the Board of Supervisors re Board Appointments Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the minute excerpt and Resolution No. 85-60 from the Board of Supervisors seating Thomas F. Riley as the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and appointing Roger R. Stanton to serve as Active Director on the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13, and appointing Harriett M. Wieder to serve as Alternate Director on each of said Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Receive and file minute excerpts re Board Appointments Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the minute excerpts from the following re election of mayor, appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, rece·ived and ordered filed, as follows (*Mayor): CitxLAgencI District (s) Active Director Alternate Director Villa Park 2 Carol H. Kawanami Wayne Silzel* Costa Mesa Sanitary Dist. 6 James Wahner James B. Gallacher -3- 4/10/85 DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 13, 1985, or the adjourned meeting held April 4, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments AEEroval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments AEEroval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments AE2roval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 13, 1985, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICTS 2,3,5,11 & 13 The Joint Chairman reported that the ReI?C?rt of the Joint Chairman Senate Subcommittee on Environmental Pollution held hearings on the proposed Amendments to the Federal Clean Water Act in late March. Testimony was limited to "'-1) a few national groups, including the League of Cities and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies. Senator Cranston also appeared before the Subcommittee and testified in favor of the Districts' proposed Deep Ocean Sludge Research Project. This project is a joint effort of the Orange County Sanitation Districts, Cal Tech and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric ABministration, and would be conducted under the supervision of the Environmental Protection Agency. Mr. Edgar commented on the schedule included in the Directors' meeting folders relative to design and construction of the Districts' Treatment Plant Odor Control Program which was recently adopted by the Joint Boards. The Joint Chairman noted that later in the agenda the Directors would be considering approval of the first phase of this odor control program, which is to hire an engineering firm to design the necessary rehabilitation work on the remaining primary sedimentation basins prior to covering them. The second phase of the odor control program is to design the covers for the sedimentation basins and the scrubbing systems at both Plants 1 and 2. Following Selection Committee negotiations with qualified engineering f itms, a recommendation for award of a contract will be presented to the Joint Boards at their regular June meeting. The design and construction schedule provi~es for completion of the entire odor control program by March 1987. The Joint Chairman announced that District No. 5 was tentatively scheduled to meet in an Adjourned Board Meeting on Wednesday, April 17, at 5:00 p.m. at the Newport Beach City Hall. Mr. Edgar also advised that the Fiscal Policy Committee would meet on T~esday, March 26, at 4:30 p.m. -4- ~ 4/10/85 He then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, March 24, at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Ruthelyn Plummer, Chuck Sylvia and.Dan Griset to atfend and participate in the discussions. Chairman Edgar also reported that a District No. 1 Adjourned Board Meeting was tentatively scheduled to meet immediately preceding the Executive Committee meeting on Wednesday, April 24, at 4:00 p.m. to review an update of their long-range financial plan and to consider enforcement action against an industrial discharger. DISTRICTS 2,3,5,11 & 13 Report of the General Manager The General Manager stated that the Districts' new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board became effective April 1st. Since that time, the results of monitoring the suspended solids (S.S.) and biochemical oxygen demand (B.O.D.), two of the principal measures of effluent quality in the Districts' effluent, indicate that they have been 25% and 20% lower, respectively, than the limitation set by the permit. Mr. Sylvester reported that the one-day trial "Toxics Roundup" being conducted in cooperation with the County of Orange will be held on Saturday, April 20. He then reviewed details relative to the Roundup and additional information distributed to the Directors on toxic materials. The General Manager then introduced Corinne Clawson, the Districts' new Public Information Officer. Mr. Sylvester announced that a Directors' orientation session is scheduled for Wednesday, May 29th •. A light dinner will be served and the staff will brief the Directors on Districts' organizational matters, long-range facilities planning, budgets and proposed new programs. A tour of Plant No. 1 will also be conducted. The General Manager then reported on a claim appearing on the Supplemental Agenda filed by Southern California Edison Company for damages in connection with some paving and drainage work by a contractor at Treatment Plant No. 2. He recommended the routine actions appearing on the agenda to receive and file said claim and refer it to the appropriate parties for further action. Mr. Sylvester then reported on an item on the Supplemental Agenda relative to employment of Charles A. Jacks to fill the new position of Assistant Laboratory Director and recommended authorization to hire Mr. Jacks at Step 5 of Range 1066G ($3390/month) based on the qualifications and experience of the successful applicant. DISTRICTS 2,3,5,11 & 13 Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee recommendations, included in the Directors' meeting folders, contained two resolutions urging the California Legislature to adopt Senate Bills 75 (Foran) and 639 (Carpenter) relating to limitation of liability for public agencies. Mr. Woodruff reviewed the provisions of the two Senate Bills and recommended adoption of these resolutions supporting said bills. The General Counsel then reported that several months ago the Districts had refused to accept a late claim filed against them in connection with a contractor's employee being injured at Plant No. 2. A petition was filed with Superior Court, and Mr. Woodruff indicated he was pleased to report that the Districts successfully argued against said petition. -s- 4/10/85 DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - Joint Working Capital Fund Self-Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DIS TRI CT NO. 11 DISTRICT NO. 13 DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re Job No. PW-119 3/06/85 $ 429,576.05 606,266.30 55,693.80 3,793.10 12,527.14 261,012.03 506.62 1,222.23 $1,370,597.27 3/20/85 $ 514,562.10 1,192,512.35 91,774.00 2,332.18 5,290.80 13,368.93 10,257.18 6,302.65 $1,836,400.19. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Paving and Drainage at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, authorizing an addition of $16,998.70 to the contract with Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, for removal of shrubs and other debris, filling in of the low regions between the Districts' southern property line and the Santa Ana River trail, additional surveying, installation of additional piping, repair of irrigation line and replacement of damaged fencing, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications re Job No. PW-119 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Paving and Drainage at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of $14,409.10 to the contract with Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-119 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-61, accepting Paving and Drainage at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -6- 4/10/85 DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-121 specifications for waste Gas Burners at '.,./ Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-121, authorizing an addition of $9,690.00 to the contract with Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, for additional work and delays relative to installation of new waste gas burners pending receipt of AQMD's approval, and granting a time extension of 270 calendar days for completion of said additional work and for said delays incurred, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ~ Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. I-2R-2A specifications for Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, for miscellaneous job modifications, resulting in a reduction of work relative to precasting sections of 9oncrete, and for additional excavation, bedding and. asphaltic concrete paving, for a net total addition of $10,874.30 to the contract with Thibodo Construction Company, and granting a time extension of 43 calendar days for construction of the precast concrete sections, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried~ Accepting Job No. I-2R-2A as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolu~ion ~o. 85-62, accepting Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications re Job No. P2-25-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, authorizing an addition of $28,778.52 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for 18 items of miscellaneous modifications and additional work required including costs resulting from additional equipment required and delays incurred in order to comply with AQMD requirements, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. P2-25-2 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby ·adopt Resolution No. 85-~3, accepting Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Approving Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers re Jobs Nos. Pl-23R, Pl-24R & P2-31R Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee Certification re final negotiated fee with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers re -7- 4/10/85 Agreement for design of Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-23R, Rehabilitation of Primary Basins 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job· No. Pl-24R, and Rehabilitation of Primary Basins A, B, c, H, I, J, K, Land Mat Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-31R, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-64, approving Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for design of Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-23R, Rehabilitation of Primary Basins 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-24R, and Rehabilitation of Primary Basins A, B, C, H, I, J, K, Land Mat Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-3lR, and for construction support services in connection therewith, on an hourly-rate basis including labor, plus overhead, direct expenses, profit, and soils investigation services, for a total amount not to exceed $325,400.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & lJ Awarding Specification No. P-075 to Allied Corporation, Chemical Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and Sector recommendation re award of purchase of Liquid Cationic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Flocculent, Specification No. P-075, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Allied Corporation, Chemical Sector, for the price of $.0552 per wet pound for a total. amount not to exceed $748,801.00 for a one-year period commencing April 12, 1985. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Awarding Specification No. S-023 to Brown and Caldwell Analytical Moved, _seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and Services recommendation re award of Laboratory Services Contract for Analyses of Industrial Wastewater, 1985 Specification No. S-023, be, and is hereby, received and ordered f iled1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That said award be, and is hereby, awarded to Brown and Caldwell Analytical Services in an amount not to exceed $41,890.00 for a one-year period commencing April 15, 1985. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Receive, file and deny claim submitted by estate of Christopher Gunsul Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the claim for damages submitted by the estate of former employee Christopher Gunsul, dated March 26, 1985, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Receive, file and apProve Interim Report of the Building Committee Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Interim Report of the Building Committee dated March 21, 1985, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -8- 4/10/85 DISTRICTS 2,3,5,11 & 13 Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals for design and construction of the proposed Administration Building Addition at Plant No. 1 Following a report by the Joint Chairman that, in accordance with the Boards' procedures, he had elected to expand the Selection Conunittee for negotiating a contract for design and construction services for the proposed Administration Building Addition at Plant No. 1, to include Directors Norm Culver, Building Committee Chairman, and Building Committee members James Neal and Richard Partin, as well as the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals from qualified architectural/engineering firms and to negotiate a contract for. design and construction services.for the proposed Administration Building Addition at Plant No. 1. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on March 27, 1985, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Approving the addition of a Y-Rating Policy to the personnel regulations and amending Resolution No. 79-21, as amended, to include said policy Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the addition of a Y-Rating policy to the personnel regulations be, and is hereby, approved1 and, Directors hereby adopt amended, providing for employment, to include is attached hereto and FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Resolution No. 85-65, amending Resolution No. 79-21, as rules and regulations re terms and conditions of said Y-Rating policy. A certified copy of this resolution made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1985 Summer work Program Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-66, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1985 Summer Work Program for painting and grounds maintenance work. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Receive and file the Lighting Energy Conservation Studies for Plants Nos. 1 and 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Lighting Energy Conservation Studies for Plants Nos. 1 and 2, dated December 3, 1984, prepared by John Carollo Engineers, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a contract re lighting energy management system at Plants 1 and 2 management system at Plants 1 and 2. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate a contract for design and installation of a lighting energy -9- 4/10/85 DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11. & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve the Digester Gas Utilization Study That the Digester Gas Utilization Study, dated March 1985, prepared by John Carollo Engineers, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Amending the 1983 Master Plan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities to include separate Central Power Generation Facilities at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 and 2, as recommended in the Digester DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 11 & 13 Approving the Second Amendment to the Amended Joint Powers Agreement Creating an Agency to be Known as the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the 1983 Master Plan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities be, ~nd is hereby, amended to include separate Central Power Generation Facilities at Plants Nos. 1 Gas Utilization Study. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 85-67, approving the Second Amendment to the Amended Joint Powers Agreement Creating an Agency to be Known as the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, providing for extension of the Districts' membership in said agency from July 1, 1985 to June 30, 1988 and increasing the annual contribution from member agencies from a maximum $600,000 to $700,000. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 11 & 13 Receive, file and approve the March 21, 1985 Staff Report and Recommendations for Contract Ocean Monitoring Services re Districts' new NPDES Permit ordered filed and approved7 and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the March 21, 1985 Staff Report and Recommendations for Contract Ocean Monitoring Services, required in connection with the Districts' new NPDES Permit, be and is hereby, received, FURTHER M:>VED: That the procedures and time schedule for engaging a firm to conduct said monitoring program, as set forth in said report, be, and are hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 11 & 13 Receive and file the Non-Industrial Toxic Source Control Program Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan, and authorizing appointment of a staff member to the post of Toxics Coordinator Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Non-Industrial Toxic Source Control Program Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan dated March 1985, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the conceptual program re said plan be, and is hereby, approved: and, FURTHER M:>VED: That the General Manager be directed to include funding for said program in the annual budget, beginning with the 1985-86 fiscal year, in an amount up to $100,000: and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to appoint a staff member to the post of Toxics Coordinator to implement and administer said program. -10- 4/10/85 DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written Fiscal Policy Committee Report That the written Fiscal Policy Committee Report dated April 10, 1985, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Authorizing staff to place all-risk insurance coverage, including earthquake and flood protection, effective April 14, 1985. for an estimated annual premium of Committee, as follows: Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to place all-risk insurance coverage, including earthquake and flood protection, effective April 14, 1985, $195,000, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Facilities Covered: Treatment plants and pump stations (excludes trunk sewers and ocean outfalls) Limits of Coverage: $10,000,000 Deductibles: Earthquake: Flood: Other: DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Directing staff to include an appropriation account in each individual District's 1985-86 budget to begin accumulating reserve funds for potential earthquake and flood damage facilities, as recommended by the DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Authorizing staff to place an initial $900,000 excess liability coverage, effective April 14, 1985 5% of replacement cost of damaged facilities $25,000 $10,000 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to include an appropriation account in each· individual District's 1985-86 budget to begin accumulating reserve funds to pay for potential earthquake and flood damage to Districts' Fiscal Policy Committee. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to place an initial $900,000 excess liability coverage effective April 14, 1985, with a deductible of $25,000 per claim and a $250,000 aggregate, for an estimated annual premium of $75,000, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Urging the California Legislature to adopt Senate Bills 75 and 639 relating to limitation of liability for public agencies Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolutions Nos. 85-68 and 85-69, urging the California Legislature to adopt Senate Bills 75 and 639, respectively, relating to limitation of liability for public agencies. Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Public Hearing on Draft Environ- mental Impact Report for the Joint Treatment works Wastewater Master Plan The Joint Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards for a public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan. -11- 4/10/85 Mr. Edgar reported that the purpose ~f this hearing was to receive public comments on the Draft EIR. He informed the Directors that following the close of the public hearing, the environmental consultant would be .directed to address the oral public comments in the Final EIR that would come back to the Boards for ~ consideration, tentatively at the June meeting, rather than respond to the comments that evening. He added ·that the record would be held open until May 1st for written public commentary. The consultant would also be directed to address all written comments received in the Final EIR. The Joint Chairman also reported that the Draft EIR was mailed to each of the cities within the District, the Sanitary Districts and the County of Orange. In all, the Draft EIR had been made available to 115 agencies and other interested parties. He reported further that, in addition, the staff has personally contacted the cities of Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach, Newport Beach and Costa Mesa, which are the cities adjacent to the treatment plants, and offered to review the Draft EIR with their staffs. Open Public Hearing This being the time and place fixed for public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Joint Treatment Works wastewater Master Plan, the Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:01 p.m. Report of environmental consultant, K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. The Chairman recognized Mr. K.P. Lindstrom, the Districts' environmental consultant, who addressed the Board giving an . overview of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the 1983 Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan. The Master Plan encompasses projects for the next 20-year period. Mr. Lindstrom gave a slide presentation showing existing facilities and '\wJ pointing out some of the proposed improvements to be constructed at both treatment plants in order to accommodate the Districts' service area's growth as approved by the local jurisdictions (cities and county). Improvements are needed to provide additional treatment and hydraulic capacity in accordance with the mandates of the water and air pollution regulatory agencies which specify that all wastewater facilities must be designed to meet the needs of all normal anticipated growth with a reasonable reserve capacity. The plan includes several projects of environmental enhancement and improvements to assure the Districts continued ability to comply with the NPDES permit requirements. By 2002-3, the flow rate is expected to increase by 33% from 232 MGD to 307 MGD. Mr. Lindstrom stated that the EIR also addresses several special studies conducted subsequent to preparation of the 1983 Master Plan such as the odor control study, digester gas utilization study and energy and lighting studies. The consultant then reviewed the facilities proposed to be constructed. He indicated that a new Plant No. 1 headworks, as well as additional primary clarification and digestion capacity, will be required by 1987-88 to accommodate the projected increases in flow. Mr. Lindstrom noted that Treatment Plant No. 2 has now reached its planned capacity of 174 MGD with the recent additional of 24 MGD of capacity. However, the replacement of two pumps in Headworks "C" and construction of a new 600 MGD outfall booster station to serve both plants are needed in order to provide for hydraulic reliability. -12- 4/10/85 Mr. Lindstrom reported that the total cost of the proposed 5-year project schedule is estimated at $112.7 million. Of the total expenditures proposed, $33.6 million is to be spent on projects to provide for mitigation of existing environmental con~erns such as odor, air emissions, and energy and chemical use. Mr. Lindstrom also reviewed possible environmental impacts associated ~ith the proposed construction and the measures that will be taken on all projects to mitigate the potential impacts. Written comments re Draft Environmental Impact Report The Secretary reported that no written comments had been submitted that evening. The Joint Chairman then advised that all included in th~ Final written comments received by May 1, 1985, would be Environmental Impact Report. Close Public Hearing closed at 8:23 p.m. DISTRicrS 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Directing the EIR consultant to address any comments received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report and to prepare a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan of the written public comment period There being no public oral comments, the Chairman declared the hearing Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the EIR consultant be, and is hereby, directed to address any written comments received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report and to prepare a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan after the close on May 1, 1985. DISTRicrs 2, 3, 5, 11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny the claim of Southern California Edison Company That the claim of Southern California re Job No. PW-119 Edison Company dated February 4, 1985, in the amount of $1,933.85 for alleged damages to their facilities incurred in connection with construction of Paving and Drainage at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER M:>VED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' liability claims administrator, General Counsel, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRicrs 2, 3, S, 11 & 13 Authorizing employment of Charles A. Jacks as Assistant Laboratory Director of Range No. 1066G ($3390/month). DISTRicr 2 Approving and authorizing execution of a Pipeline License Agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company re Contract No. 2-25 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to employ Charles A. Jacks as Assistant Laboratory Director at Step 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 85-70-2, approving and authorizing execution of a Pipeline License Agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for -13- 4/10/85 right-of-way required in connection with construction of the Fullerton-Brea (Purchase) Relief Trunk, Contract No. 2-25, and authorizing payment of $250 in accordance with the provisions of said Pipeline License Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:32 p.m., April 10, 1985. DISTRICT 3 Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re Contract No. 3-28R Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, authorizing the addition of miscellaneous items of work and the deletion of others resulting in a net deduction of $940.90 from the contract with Mike Prlich and Sons, and granting a time extension of 2 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:32 p.m., ·April 10, 1985. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment . That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:32 p.m., April 10, 1985. DISTRICT 11 Receive and file report of General Counsel re proposed agreement with Wilmore City Development Company Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the report of General Counsel dated April 1, 1985, re proposed agreement with Wilmore City Development Company for def erred payment of connection fees for the Breakers Apartment complex in the City of Huntington Beach, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. The Board then requested the General Counsel to provide periodic status reports on the matter • DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:33 p.m., April 10, 1985. -14- , . 4/10/85 DISTRicr 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:33 p.m., Aprir 10, 1985. County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11 and 13 -15- .. rn .. >< ::c -t:C ·- I 1. I 1'"1 I --i ::: ::r::=o I ~--" ::: I llf :(.i : .. ( 1: .~I· " J. r r r · r. • . 7 .~·?fll ;'. 7 : .. :)f-~ 1•7.!.df- : 7 :~. ~~ f, 7 • 7 ~ :?C:.U .. 7 ~'if:,, I 7 ~ ';) ]jl i 7 '! 271 . 7 ! :??:! ,, 7 ~;> 73 i73~1 7'f i.1.!::n : P?1l ,:7 ~ ;·11 ,. 7 !.,;.>711 ,,7 3;.7r-. -L~~ h. .":7:':'.H I 7:lf<t r·n?t-.5 L 7 '! ~ f•'f •n?f·!.· ' 7 ~ ',Jf•f ' 7 ! :· f.., ·. 7 °!' :· ,...;. ; 7 ~ ?t-': : 1 !.::q<. • 7 :~:·c.1 .: 7 ~ ;:or.2 ,1 7 ~ ~· r ~ 1'73?l'• f• 7 ~·:?~!~ " 7 :•. ;1 r,f: .. ·1.~ -:-~.-, ··1~:\C·l' ·' ., :• ~H)Q 7 .,. <11• •• . ·; .~ .. r } i 7 3~ •• :;· ;' 7.: 'll t' ~ '.• 7 ."'! ,,,. 1 ~:it !1 . 7 !. '!· i (: 7 .! .• : 7 I ., ~ ! .:~ ~ 7 !.-'ll •1q ( • 1 1 ' •: • , 11 I <. l. ~. ( · • r• I . r .~ I· l I :. L I·• L l ~ ~ ~ If C. i.: !. l [ '·I · J /I·' I "I. t f:li (,,q t.UM!!l.i\ At 'd i .... ,_ ! r 1 .., <' .\ I I· 1 A l I ( N l 1 I ~" T ~' l t: 1 ~; ll f (, f. t r ( ~ c r 1 I~ T .., . .. , ,., .. , .. ,; r; ii p c (II ' ; ld T J r. i.~ HJ • r n ~· r t. r 1 •, :. 1 u T , P :. J-T :-. • I ~. c • ('OIJt.•H ~tLLt~'.All llf'Cll·,if r n :i 1 •. tJ f r N c r t ~-u PH v c (I. , 1 : .. c • Cf·L :-Ufll $Tl· Tf ff (!,LJf ;:Ort.;Jla (jf I :)1 • 1· 11\ ~: f I fl I·, I ti l (I J Ct< ~o:. <; c I r I l. l I F n f. s ~-(j r J f. 1 f s ur.r.no 1·rnt ''F-iCJ~£~. Jl•r. nur•r-.: El~~·J."i~<-Ci:~F. o 'vtL~ ~ t.Lf; rr. ( A <. 1 1-1 A I· , I t-; f • l •H. t-j ;.r~ 1 r I! t I fJ l • fE~f~Al ()~PES~ rrRr. F I ':. r t1 f. t( & H> I-11 P. C (. • fLLr i VfFTIC~l ro~c~tl[ r u · !. v s 1 r :· ~ r • t.'. • f l i.· t• r ~ ~. :-!I: T t L ~· f 0 I<~ UL t. f ~ • I ~ r • FOU~~TAJfJ VtlliY C~~tfRI CITY Of rnur.TAH! VALLO [.Ol illD L. fc) \; /.SSC:C'ILltS 'T11! fi),l·PIH, CCH.PAl\Y u.r . .\~·L I. lit.A r.r 11 ro. GE!•;£1-'/..L f!l•\f-lNC cni<r. G[f!(fd\l Ell t H IC cri. G fl': f. r.: Al T ~· l. ff t IL' fl· l' C (: • G J i I.( l 1 C t-i-r•'. l 'fC ti l l L t 1 ~: l • H .t-01 c (,I' f-= 4 Ny Grra.cr J. Hll co •. lft.Lf'i<l~ SLIPLY re. 111LTJ, JlliC. H) ': f' Y W { l. l , I f, C • tl1)L~r f;F fi;TTr'l tU, f .• ~ • •• lit 111 ~. r l'l. , t r1 r • titll I H:ITG~, r l/>(t-; illlr'l't;. :-:T.Tf t· u r l I f\ <.l C \ ~ l' F I L Y hY ·fl~T~1- n.:·1,~tr·1.u It-if-: AIJff. ,.~,;r.uCT!' 1 '" ;;r. / '1 1 • t. ,:· r 1 Till . .iltf\Jlili"S 'll(•Pf ! ,J:1':.• (~•1.::fllaL~ .• II·'"• I< • t • i' • C (, ~· I : !" ~ "· I ~ l.. I . I :.1 · I ' ' j f\ c: • I< l I ! I· ... L I :·1t. ( r+ I Cl I n · ~: !'A If· i 3 / .. t. / i• ~ ~ :1o1 ourv T 11ti~t~.!b.1"i j lj ·~ t" e I 4 f i:i., ~ • ':. •' 1.?ti:H.l.'ttt 126 .i ... ~. i J2 .1. (, 11 • 5 ~ :.! • "ii. 11 i ..1. ·H· H~d.bli ! 'J • ~5 0 • L f! , 2 '~..,. ','1 i?.;·3. n 1 2 t 7 ~ 3. ·=·~ 1~'~il0. • l. $5 3 •. ! l !~t!ll'i.1~1 'l2P4.7f:. iltl4't.l't~ i1J!J.'t2 :f.5l."1 Tl25.ll iltlJ!l.l!!l 1 f\2 ~· • : f· .1 1?. CJ.;; 6 1b78.7!j ,,;>, (j. ·15 $~J.?l ~2t5~6.t:t! $ 6 ~ • 't (, 3 • t' l J.l+ l. 11(; lb'}. :2 :i;: it!,. ~" 155.1~' 1~17.lS ·~~21.'H· l/44._•;. ~ ~ !·. 4 'i·b ~. '1 4 $ ~" , ':> ~ i, • H : l 1 c; .: • / 't , 1 1 ~ •• , ! i ;,,l) • ') :· I '' , <'· ~ l~ • 1 t· '!I!•, ':':>5. 11:- ·~ ·iJ'. :' ! '•J'J '+. ~" ( fll f. (' i' I P 1 I \1 t\ CONTRACTOR 3-21-3R TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FENCE INSTALLATION WATER SOFTNER RENTAL ANNEXATION 1103 P~OCESSING FEE RELOCATION OF WATER £ AIR LINES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PRINTING PLAHT 12 REPAIRS PAINT SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS OFFICE SUPPLIES OCEAN MONITORING DELIVERY SERVICE PIPE SUPPLIES ASPHALT CUTTING PUMP PARTS CSOOC #2 MANHOLE REPAIRS LAB SUPPLIES FILM PROCESS I NG WATER USEAGE SAFETY CONSULTANT ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES HARDlMRE OFFICE SUPPLIES ~LECTRICAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE BUDD CllAIN ELECTRICAi. SUPPLIES ~LECTRICAL SUPPLIES HARDWARI! ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS OFP I CE SUPPL JES HARDWARE ESSENTIALUBE SMALL HARDWARE OFFICE SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CllLORINE ENGINEERING 5-19-R-1 BEAIUNGS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES '•· ( i :.1 :! •I ·'I !"! I !''! ;'j i·' ; .. I :..,· 'IJ '·' "' , .. • .··1 ( ... , I 'I :"I !1 " ... II\ r !• ... , i rn r. >< ;. ::c ··~ : .. ,to i-·~ '·· ---f ! . l ::: . '.):> .. I N ::: I. ! .• ! I.! ( r L t•I: r. Ci \; 1.1 r.. ~ ~ T I· c' • : ., ,!, ; 1 (' I 7 j; ) u .. 7 .s:::.?i; : .. , ! ~~ 21 1:~: n . 7 :,~~:.' '· 7 :,~ 2't ' -, .~ :·:>~ ' 7:, ~; ;:-,, ; ·1:.2n , 7 ... '. ~; 1~ ~1~~2~~ ·n ~·i.· ~ .7-:. :.'. l ( 7:. !~ ·n ;:,3 ,, 7 :i: ~~4 • 7 :.' ~~1 .:n ~f­ '1? H '. 7 ~ ~ ~f· ~: 7 ~::~y t 7 :~;-4 ·I 1 :! ::-41 :·1~~4~ :1.~'4.S f•7 3:-:'4'+ l732't5 ~ 1:-;'tf: .. 7.1·~47 . 7 ~' 't c- 7 .~ ::''! Q .n,_':.Jr t 7:. ,"'!)) • 1 .. • ;-: !,~-i 7 ,'.:1~.~ I 7: ~ ! " 17 :.-:'~!.• I' 7: ~,~ (. ·:13;:.':!1 : 7: '.:'' E· . 7 :. ~ ~ ·~ -7~,~·~·' ·7 ~f.! ·• 7 ~ f.2 • 7 ~ L ~ ( '; 1 . " ·-.n r ~ I , • i' I· ~ I L i ( "' I ' .~ L •: r 1 ~ ~ 1 1i · r. ,\ 1 ~ ' / . 1 11 • i· "· c 1 r ! f Of.\ T ~.Ut';',[!1 1'.I :i ~ c 1 t,u... ': ,. , n / 1 11 \ P 1 !:; 1~1 c r ~-: m o H 1-1 u r i1u,.,1 v \ f I·:( • .;., ..... •''• cnr: 1.r.·; ;',((I ~Sl•f'fl. /.JI. l'Qt!rnf ~·;<'f-~ ... ~. /.l: T I l t-; I I; C: rt-U ~: i ~. l ~ , Jt.. C • /·iJVA~:Cl. Cll.!".Tkul TOrt:!t lf.C. A)I· CAl !f'>·:•ft. tL l -:', 11 H VI. tt IC L f St J H;. 1 r. u· 1 c '·, ~ H 1 ( r>; 1 1 f 1 r H' ''!.Hi c 1 :.: Ahl f(J(:..' TfCP~JC/Jl Sltf'Pll I• I\: i.t1 l 1 ~· f, I: T I 1 t~ I· l J 0 I\ 1-~,:~r.u· ~f:..u;, cot~~Tnuc11u1: : ... , t) ,. y ( c ;J 11 t, y t.ul:t. r:f I\' Cl;hJ·. ,·. , ~ r'! ~-1 dl t: s l 14 1 r ~ Ii': r • ; . .:·'~o~·-r.1~rr., 11;c. ! ~ ~ .~ c J I• H I] l' 0 r; (fi £ n Pr ii(\ • ' I t.(' ts~oc. lf (,ff ICHL At•HYl llfll ~-c Jl\iDL~lr<ll-l ~.UFH ,, 11\:C'. f K I< C 0 k P 0 H t. T I Cl i..: f: ·' ; .. 14 o r :. n. !· IC ;, r J 1 t ~ r. : f Ci\ ff. r, I i\ !.> T ;. U ·~ ~· I'.; H f rt:~ :.J'\i f .H !; ~ i d. Vt. l t Jr!( • ~l ll(U Jr,[H!~ 1h1 :'\l \'(h) (L[ ~ ~ H l t. L , I r. C • rn ! ~lo L r ~ r-."' fl. i 1 ti c" l c; H' • , u~ r (Pful'.S rnslFL~':ll.l~ ~ I l l l Af', It • I lJ Tl l k r l p PffO~rITIONJNI en. C.PI CALlfGf.r.1:,. 11.•c. c:~c flHs~ , J:\!(. rs CJH'f ,,r;'r C • ~ • P • C • 1\ • I l• I l. l M (, (; !'. ht t. [' c: ;\ L -\ L '· :'-s r I . ~ .. r ~-f. ,, I' c 1-1 • ) f\J r .. C..l JFOH.Jt ,·.UH· COLLl~lOh U.C Ot·'Ffll'fE U~f CLOT!' <.:l;. (;,.•·1·1.;r ~ .• 'i~·'l1I LCH•f-. Jr•(. J1:~ '" f'''Cll'I ~:-. .. JN( 11:~ J': 1 .r.. c !' i; 11 L u t. r-. 1: J t. t. r ~ ' C L!:T H .) Y S 1 f l· s r rh· I~:· ~ f'../ VI l l C: \f r11r.v1>t1:; u.: .• 1 •• , 1r:c.. r.1.t.:-., (O •• Hr. C' l • " 1· L• 1 ,· I· ' ; i V I r: f I f r I • c .·. l. ~ .• 1 C :; "· < , ~ L I i. ,. 1 f 1 r l • ( T F I <: : L r • I • 1 • c l'1 1. ! ~ c1 L re: cr.r' • l f i ;.; I.'-1: ' • f f. V I r r ~ fl.· I :1 s l·/. If.I ·13/ .•Lo/'.'5 A,..•f 11Ji,T r,Lc li• 11 l lltl\. i :.! ,, t; • ~· 1 ~ J ~ '• • ·1 r :i-t: 7 • 'c~ 1 !> •1 • 2 ') i: • '• ! !I. l SI(·.• ·1 l ll,49i.l~ 1.~'l.3t'. 1 ~2 p. ~)f 'l :c. : .• ',, $!, f.U J • .1 r. i-lt?'!ile7f 12::-,1c.it..l,l 3?.'t7.~£ S.57.~5 V:13't. 7l' s. 2 (. :; • (~ 4 l J-; 2. ,; ti J.lilt'f'l:i:'. ~~ !~!If.~&; s ':>2'1. f:i1' t l • 7:: 6. f ( s h!itS .... 7 Sl'3~e4U 13::, •. ,,, "7h~.~j~ ,.292.'t~ 1 ~H 'l. 'I: i ~l .l. 1 ;,;· < l h 7. c.c. $ 1 ' l ') 7. ~ ') 1.)~ 2 •• ~ lJ ~H •. B $~·,215.11 12.622.t"~ 1·2~A. '1:1 ~2. ;13.;. t Cf 1 l 2'lf ' 't f: '+ • t. ,, H)H, 724. :~· 1.}(l.(:f, :I.!. , C! .H: • t. 7 $4 1. l 1 i ( -~ ., •. ll :t l ' _,t,.: • -J· J.;, •. 2. • .:. 1.'·. L:. Jr i 2 .t I;:' -j • !: 2 TRUCK PARTS BEARINGS LAB SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR P2-25-2 AIR FARE VEHICLE LEASING LAB CHEMICALS OFFICE SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT TREE REMOVAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CHEMICAL. COAGULENTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONCRETI! SEMINAR REGISTRATION HARDWARE SLUDGE DISPOSAL TRAVEL EXPENSES . ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SANO & GRAVEL ELECTRIC CART P.ARTS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PETTY CASH PUMP REPAIRS WORD PROCESSOR TRAINING LAB SUPPLIES VALVES SEMINAR REGISTRATION LAB SUP PL JES TRUCK REPAIRS HARDl~ARE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ENGlNEERING P2-25-2 ENGINEERING Pl-22,J-6-2 TELEPHONE SYSTEM EMPLOYEE MILEAGE GASOLINE COMPRESSOR PUBLICATION CAl.C IUM Clll.OR IDE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PAlns ( • ... :;I ) I "I .::1 !''I p ..1 :·I ·1 :1 ., 1·• .. :I 1,: ,, ;,1 ' i·' j.• 1 .. : ,1 ,, i" r I :.-,, rn I, X (' .. .! :r: ~ I c to -:.'# --f ::: . ' ):::a I .. • I I J"· ,. l"'j ... 1 i ,··; r ·I H! . ,;•11 '' .. ! .. I •'-I I '~·. \.N :::: r t r·.1~ r. e r '·''Pt I T r .. , .• :· 7?; ~ 11' '·1~n 1 ( 7 ~ .'i) 2 L73~)3 .. 1~:(14 ,,7~:'15 t'7~.~1f: •: 7 :a. 317 { 7 ::-~-1 fl .. 7::. 31 (~ 7 ~ ~ • .:·1j ~. 7 .• 3~ l l!7j322 (:12'.~23 f7 ~ ~;'4 (7 ~ j2= l• 7 :i: !b I· 7 .~ .~;-_ 7 il1 ~ ~£::~ o:-.j29 117 ~-~3i) l'7 ~ 3 ~1 r·1~~32 :. 7 "!. ~. ~~ .: 7 .~ =·3't '17 3 ~ ~ ~i 1·7!~~t L: 1 ~ ~n ~ 7 :: ~3fl ( 7 ~ ~ 39 r1!~'tt ·7~~41 ,~7~~~'12 "7~:43 q .i.:~.l,4 ·., 7 .. ~4~, ,. 7 ... ;'.4f:. 'B~'+7 :. 7 :z. ~~'•[· ··7?. ~'17 '.' 7 :~ !-:, .. \ .·7.~~:1 L 7 ! .. l.!: c •. 7 .' ;:r.~;3 t: 7 ~ ! ~.4 .J7 -~:a-~~ ( <,J• r-•• JT 1 1~1 ~·r1.~ 1•. r11·11t-1 iHt' :.~;1•·1 uATf ~' ii·' 1 .. c. ict I "I• T ". lJ". . I l 1~ /, I '' ·c r H.T'r ~·i-.JT~lJct, r,l~·TfilCTS Of Ol'f·l-fl r,•t;l•!IY "I ' I i.'" L ~. r. 11:~1r.c1':~ul·!L) er~ L • ~ • l, • ~· • , 11: r • Lr.1;·'.'.~U. CUl.I:,, 1./if• l i: L i L I. C 0 f\ ~UL l 1 H l U,J.. • L 1 t r r o ,.. ·· => u ~ H ~ r;. v l u ~-t·f , L' L i :-•t T J t. '-Li 1 •: l F: 11· UT 01< S, 11" C. LO~ ~~Gflf~ ll~ES L G I..: '~ Y & I ~ '. i.l C I t: Tt ~ M I! C• ~ Y !'. T fl-1 ~· MAhVAC t:l£CH.Ot.1C~ , .. £~;: rc::~sct Jr-f'.11.u l.'t.Tl r f\!Al Cu CltfMlf.lll ro. NATIO~AL Ch[H~f APCH ~arJOhtL Lurel~ SU~PLY N:~tPK flfCT~O~ICS CITY Of NflJFCIRl oEACtl ~crJV[~TAL CHE~ICAL CO~P. Tl1l Otir..i/.~ l CJf\F OLH'FJC c11rnc.H co. o~co oco~ CLOSi~ SEPVllf Ol"r'•L~ ~l.lnJCf Ct1 tJtllY Of (·f.'Af\!l:l CO~NTY SA~lTATIO~ nr~Tklfl o~~~rl COU~TY ~ATF~ [J~TRJCT r P :. 1 ~.· ! us 1 H 1 rs , 1 t 1 c • t f,ffflC MCl llf. Off I ff~ rr.cu1c ~AfllY ~ruJ~rfNT re. f'ilClflC Ulll fAL~f~ ~Lot. SY~Trr r~~F. Pl!~AfOt.. i•IJ~IM.c::s S'~HM~. r [ t~ C1,, IL:. 1 I 0"' SY~ Tf t' S, H. C • ,.\ l t< f J. fl l c It ?. !: 0 "· ~ FHOGF.C~~IVf ~.Hfl SlltHY PE CY-~L[lN co~~. Tl'i f(t C..ISHP Rf n~ui4 I r u c Ht llf' H. Ptd PUC I~ F-f('1Jt! fflP.1- i< CJ I H l ~l ~ ~-~· i Y ( 11 S p y q_. -h ( 11 c l) SAi;Ol. crilJJfl"["!f CC. ~-f. •' T ~ I \I• f l [ C J ;~ l ( I·' .i T t • ~ ~: ~ t. :. ~· 1. 0 ( I' ~-Ii 1·1 l Y ~: t'. I T , , I I I· r . ()I .: I· l '( t I •; r Sil:Th fr1•.~1 r·rrrcr r~l·1rrp1 s CL-T 1 • l" j, c: j. L If • [ r I •; n c (;. !°' j_I • c ~ l. I i:• I' (' c ~ • e r 1 ' 11·· ~ 1 ·" 1 ~' .1 " / i 6 / r-~ ,; ~·, Oll 'J.,. 1 ..s • ,:., 3 l •• , ~ ~ H 5. t.~ ., 1q4. 15 s3,:.3q.:1 :lb' f.: 71'1. : .. ·. t.27b.:?l. Uh. 35. 2k :H, 75'.l. Ji' $1dq.S.H9 ~ 2 1. );) ·~6. )J HS7.kCi !i.~5.4'1 'f.55fuC:!J S..3 3'. f! l S.3Eu .1(J :l?, 7 '.• 3. Ir. ·121.3.74 S.27,!;)'33.6.! 150.l'U "£5'f • Hl UtH3.~'6. $ 3. 1'1 s. u· :I.If!!. 1 ~ 1317.1! $!lt'l7~.2f•. t-6~ 1. l u !?H.67 ll t4ltle42 $ 1 , 7 l ;I • H 1, !l3,<J2 11.04 t7'l14C'j. J~ H..H.l't Ul~.-75 :lltJ'l2eP~ S4hS.7't , }1'13. "/6 ~:J~6.:!-4 !-1 ?. .I • ~~ 7 1 l .J t1. J 4 'i.V:7.b7 'l '1? ~. ,...,, I H.!J7 tJ,?.hJ.,7 t~:.s2,4r)~.::-~ l't7d:H.2~ C. L1 [ $ ( • T F r l CH: UNIFORM RENTAL TRUCK PARTS FILM PROCESS ING ENGINEERING P2-SR-2 SAFETY SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT DESIGN 2-10-lA ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE CHEMICALS PAINT SUPPLIES HARDWARE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WATER USl!AGE CAUSTIC SODA ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CHLORINE REPAIR DOOR CLOSERS OXYGEN MEDICAL EXAMS REIMBURSE WORKERS COMPENSATION WATER PRODUCTION PAINT SUPPLIES FIELD TRAILER SAFETY SUPPLIES TELEPHONE METAL BU I LO I NG COMPUTER SERVICES HYDROGEN PEROXIDE CONTRACTOR 3-28R STEEL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LEGAL ADVERTISING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES COPIER LEASE TRUCK PAlnS VALVES ELECTRIC MOTOR ELECTRIC MOTOR TOOLS PIPE SUPPLIES OFFICE FURNITURE POWER USEAGE NATURAL GAS .. "' '\ ., I)• ·1 j I: iJ " " ; .. , . I i~.:I •/ ' '. I· r ·::1 1·1 J ·•! "! C .. .... f'T1 >< =r: ·-to --I .~ ! . I .• ..i::-:::: 1· 1 • i I' ~ ~ 1 I ' : I .. i . ~ - ~ i ! c· { f lJH· r C i.,,tl>f<~~T r:c. t•7 ?, '.!·6 • 7 ! !:!:. ., f.1 '3 :'\:1i- l' 7 D~'? ~ 7 ~? (:11 l 7 ~ :' f) ,· 7? !.f·:> I]"!-. "!-cJ3 t.7~31-4 ~7:~3f!> •·7~-~f,f : P.~l 1 '7 '! .. ,,, ( 7~ ~(:r. ~ 7 '!:'f 7!1 q3~71 ~' 7:. .' 1:: :·,7::i! 13 r 1..,, _., 1., f7 ~ ~ 7~ fEHf:. r. 73!·77 ,;7~~7E! 117:!379 ·. 7 ! 3~: t• (, 7 3.3f"l i,7:Pf.2 C• 7 .:S:~;J3 .. ( c. ] • 1 c .• J r I I • ' 1 .,. r. ;. ~ I u [ n I i t I iHil[SSJt-,r IJ~lf ~/:It~-l·t.H •1 !·1 (•i\T t.U"'t'~!< 11~·'•.3 r:ut:n ~1.1·.flt) )(1 '.. l'lSllUCL> (Jt l'l!L' (.f f(.ur-1TY r U H' ~ Hi JI) J 31 • (, I H' v r t-·i r,t- ': C,1, p,r I·~, f \o!Jfo;l P.:) ll 11 Cl•• Sll'~~l•Al.!:: UhSTlilll:llt.'• COii. l Iii ~ l.lt l·L It t· ~ Tllt.•'Y f :JGJt'f(k fl\·(, Tl·ilO., ·1'l.J'!i': T ti I ,, ,,, P l ... ~-r ( () tn T ! ! 1 ; r iH ( r' '.;TH I. r l I 0 I. (. l'. ' I r, ( Tt1CiUS(lJ.; Ll·COllifo; er•. Tnt~~~~tkJC~ GCLtviL, J~r. H:.~fl lf..A'vf L TiHJ(I' E tillH.1 ~f.!Pf-LYt H.C. 1 k u c K I : 'r n i< " l: l I ,. f c; l' I r ,, t ~'. l J'H !11\f. ULT I!'-'<'· l 1Nllfl"' ~APCfl ''.f PVICt. V. ;) • r. TF S 1 Tt.' G \I i.o i( ~ C Jf I-IT Jr I C V"Ll(Y CllllS ~l'PHY CO. VI.;~ J I. ft i. R A J I· TC~ Vll\Jf\G flUt fP\•TffTICil\ V•HO H 1.n1 INt. WALKUit:/, O:filNt SfRVJCH TH ~'f ~: u:1n• f.LEC H C:fdC COF.F. \· r ~ l l R t·: ~11 Qr ~ :.L l O Y U• I Ht f Jr.:f S Vl RVILU >' t" r. x r GP J.. • )ftk't i is~~CllfS, INr. 71f· TE•·1·or.:.HY t [Rsor.r .. rL R I Ct: 11 R r r • I~ u (. I( TGPL CL/ lt'f; Ff. Ir 3ll.t /~~ bl' GUNT \. ~;> '. ! :-· t't,.s'"J~ •• 'i. ~. 3 1 • ~: 7 13tU't5.bl: 12JJ.72 '2 3 b. •'lil ~ 1 <J .... · ,, l • ~ i: :t.2.78i. ·~ j ~· 1 11 ..... (: 12::.>u._~: $ltl26.1·· rn1q.7~ 1 6 (Jt 11 3 • {· 3 1.1H.FJ ! 1 , ·10 1 • 2 :1 $21 ·:27.1.15 S 1 , 'i .; 1 • .H ~Sl~ef.7 s.~'f8eiH~ i1t11.r.o. UH~'f.'f~ 1161.76 i 1 ' 2 6 1>. ,, 5 'Lb5 ·1. '.' c H.12 • .!~ '1tYLl'.l.ij3 $1,917.lH 1a5.11e 1. l ' 'f .;: l t ~· 7 l • 1 3 :;::============= Pr'; n J f TIC. IJ . KEROSENE CONTRACTOR 2-24 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BEARINGS BEARINGS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR 1-2R 2A PAINT SUPPi.JES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AIR FARE TRUCK PARTS TRUCK REPAIRS CONTRACTOR PW 119, PW 129 DELIVERY SERVICE LAB SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES LAB SUPPL ms PRINTING SPRINKLER INSPECTION BEARING TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WELDING SUPPLIES DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY COPIER LEASE VALVES TEMPORAf~Y HELP DIRECTORS COMP. & MlLEAGE ( ; ! ., .-i 'i ·! I ,~·: ;::i .. ... i"I ·•·1 .. , <I ;..:! ~ "' If': '' rT'1 '">< ::c ·-b:I --I ~ FllN[l HO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -.. . CL~IHS PAio o~io6/85 SUHHARY AMOUNT #2 OPER FUND $ 993.86 #2 F/R FUND 11,533.28 #3 OPER FUND 170.09 #3 ACO FUND 260,841.94 #5 OPER FUND 496.95 #5 ACO fUND _______ ----------------------·-----------·--··· _ __ _ _ ___ ___ _ 9, 67 H6 8PER Fl::IHB 118: IH 17 6PER P~HB 6,e1e.es #11 OPER FUND ·--·-. l,222.23 #5c6 8PE~ fHHB 1,,,£.85 #5C6 Ae8 fl::IH8 18,955:82 161!7 6PER FHI~~-----------·-·-------________ ---· _h,!!,LQP JT OPER FUND 429,576.05 CORF 606,266~30 SELF FUNDED WORKE!\~' COMP. 1N.$l1MN.H fl.IN.D 3,793.10 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 55,693.80 --~--·---------.----------·~ --------- :I:> TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03/06/85 I $1,,61,571.1) U"l ' ' ' ( $1 ,370,597.27 •l ( PROCESSING DATE 3/01/85 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ., ( j·•· i·' "1 ''1 '.1 :.:·.1 1 .. 1 i .. I '"I :! ,1 r•! .' ! "' ( ( ( ~ °"\11 r urio r,o 0 I '; l} -,J T r· r ~ I ..... ~: ! K I t: { r ~ I. I T ;. l ' I· ll C. I. •; S I :•1 b Ii f, ·r t" \ I I 1 I 1. ' P r. ~ ; l, I 1'f)1t1 ~.Ul~i,!:tl .·.1 .. ·~ r . Ii Id y s lll·i [ Tf, 1 I f; Ill r If s 1 f. I c r s 0 t-(I ... ,, I• (, t ( f1" "' T y ID ·•II II JIU U I. k R U.. T l'HI • l!7~4!i.3 ---C.'.7~A:H1 ('7340~ v [ 1.1.0;\ l.i·f LU~:·i" C..CiR~. ---AOC· rAllJ.l :)TnJi·H~G ~.llcVJ(f AG~ rLrcrHUNIC~. INC. r73q~6 AR/I Clr~N ~734t:7 AClJON JrJ<;li~lJIHl\15t Jr.r.. J734118 All' Ctlf!' SYSTli''~• ll·C. :i 7 .3 4 0 9 A I fi rR 0 fi II c T s ! rttf M 1 c ~ t s • I . Ir:. • ·~' --·-n734.1:1-------/.LL MAKC5 nrr1cr '1!.eu111~r rn. )111 .. -) llo ~73"11 All -SHTf VE111cuc:,, H.C. 073412 ALL[N fl[CT~IC ro. C73'413 ALLf.rJ ~.~lilJL[ASWG Cl~. C734J4 ALL'HATL H!~URl-NCf co. 173415 AMLRJCAN COffR[SSOh CO) i---~ .. ~,41E.---··-------.U4f P JC Hi SC Il NT IF IC PF-:OOUC H CJ 1 .3 4 l 7 A "4 f U l C I>'~ TE Ch N I C A L Stu• F· U ANht(lt' l.l.JTOH/ITIOI\ -------·-· T llt. AN C tHl I' J1 A C K I N (. C. u • fl G LI A lH t~ C n H JI • AR~Ol.l-1}( SCl~t u1c. r l I l i' S fol, Ill i 'H ;t. ! /1• ._, t.f.l(;IJf.Jl 1 ~ <.J. 7 !i 'I .~ 2 s:, • •.It~ 1?H~.b~ 17?.t..4 l-?14.14 ii q?. •n td • .'•14. ;->.·. !. l l I}. 2't $ 1 t '• <J ~ • l ,, 15,!','j~).·1.) \'t 1 't. !i ::; 1 .. Bti. f'.~ is.~~1.2~ "'i 12. f>t; !?.Sf ... (.4 i.~ '). 311 f.2.b5l.~'t 3 1 3 t '>7 5 • b A HH.25 1-----v.:7.342;l----R~ 01.1·-Tf\U f.K-fiOl>H. S-~--[f.U IP t.:!. NT--------· ---· --·-----!.12&.J •. !12 ... -·-·-· ---·-----·- \l t ',1.17 •. : 11. u:i C 7 3 4 2 3 to St-: UP 0 ll I\ -~ I M 0 tJ -t-1 A" Tl r Y AS~OCJAJIO~ Of ~ETROPOLJl/IN) ·-.. --·-·----ASSOC. Of flffHUL ANALYTlft.L 11 KI< C 0 Ji P 0 R AT I 0 1\1 0 7 3 4 2 7 BA K E ft ff. u I F t~ nn R Hi H L s 1-----'"'~~428 ---------ft(fK~Af.f ·I lllOUSTR I AL · - r7 3 't 2 Y fl Er S CJ N S f, ~ (J & t R A Vt l " II\. C • 073't30 r.cvcn lfJrlU~TRUL vr1ncu s ..., -.. J73431 Uifr<LY "' .\SSC.CJ.AHS, P.·C. 1 ' 0 7 3 4 3 2 B I r. lHH R r:r JT ~ L C 0 • 11 r-7.Hl.3 fiL~kEt 1JfiFFl1T fr. H!l~Nt l~ -.1?731134 --·--··--· •·O~AR Mt.Gr..ir TO Hr," I Cf' I Nf. ~· 073435 MlfH/ll l l:'~Al'J[JHUJ R fl~Suc •• Jt•C: .II'' G7.3lf~6 1~Rrrmr11-F ILnu.1, F. 11~soc., i:.c. ~1 C73437 Ttl( l;UkH C0f.!l'.1NY ·~ II fl7343h n3'13'1 -------··n7.3 4 4 o !...7~441 '.'7 :.'.442 ~7:1-443 ·t.:l' r" / :~· ·-·-~ 1 ~ ~ 4 f, if;! ';1'!44't 117~'+4? ~1~·'t 117 117 ,., 4 4 lc t,. ~----·. --- riu.:.1<r ruc11.flHil'i!f.. cc. tdlllAM 11. f"·UJl[f1 CPl CAL JH11lNT /., Jl,f. c • '..J • r • r • ;.. • I [· I l l ~, (\ {Ip 11 ! I I ' C/•llfO•.r,p t.llTl• rl•LLI'51fl';, IMC c A LI f" • ;~ u; I (j r: I. l •• lo' "l I ,, ( u t; l I i y C A ., H~ I L LI t: I l<t. r. L (· T •1 f. O. CA i. C Cl, It! r • c f\ ... L I.)$ \I I I. l. t. ~ ;. ... ;i ;.i 11'· t f': Ts C/\()ttCO, l~.l.. Ctif IHOr· u.~~.A. t JM'. 1. J '1 ". 11' ·t I q't • 11:: ''tl,')3Ue!':il l't ~1. \.Ill .. -f.'j24 .6~ 1 .?~,.. 't ~'. i1 d7R.1Jf! i •15 ~. :l:l l 117 5 •. : :: n1q.57 11.~.S.4~ ~1 .... 12.5q l.";43.14 'iH6.72 11 • 16 5 .• h ~ 1" 1 e ~ 1 ;} • ~· G I ~ H •l •.• ~ 1. 7 2 ••. J 11,11H•'·7 l 1 ' . "1 1. J (j H 2. ~~ i?~r •• 3~ i.ool 6. ':"f: :I J •·~'I I• I .! 'l 1 h ' .~ 6 s • ( It flt "Cl' 11· r ll•ru HARDWARE PARKING LOT STRIPING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FIBER GLASS ELECTRICAL REPAIR OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR VEHICLE LEASE CONTRACTOR PW-118 TRAILEP. RENTAL CLAIM SETTLEMENT COMPRESSOR PARTS LAB SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT PIPE SUPPLIES CHEMICALS ELECTRICAL surfLlEl \l~f·L<r at +fl ~RESS ES CONFERENCE REGISTRATION SEMINAR REGISTRATION SLUDGE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES GRANITE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WORKERS COMP. ADMINISTRATION TRASH DISPOSAL OFFICE SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS ENGINEERING SERVICE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIHBURSEHENT WORD PROCESSOR TRAINING SEMINAR REGISTRATION REPAIR AUTOMOBILE , NPOES/CONSTRUCTION OEWATERING PERMITS HARDWll.RE REPAIR VALVES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT VALVE GASOLINE .-. 1:1 ) 11 ·:1 :.1· ,. !_::1 "" 1 ... '.'i .:1 . ·1 i.:1 , ... .·• I ~ ' ·' " ) II ;/ !'' ':::1 I II •' ) ·,.,' r ! , rn !~ -to -' -I :: l:P I IN :: 1' 1 ;··; I,! •· •.1Hj r.oc• • r hr.~, .• T :"'. -. 7 .' ,, ,, .·! ·7:~4r,,, 7 .':,. ';-1 ; 7 ~· ,, !.. ? ·: 7 :• 4 ~· .•. . 7 :' ,.r; 4 I 7 ! /j ~· 1. ·.:7 7,41... ... 7 ... L,~ 7 I 7 .:' /j ~ ·~ : 7 .:' 1,:, :1 ... 7? 4 i •-' . 7 :· 4 ~ 1 . p 4(.? . 7 .~ 4 { 5 • 7 I 4 ~.'f :7:''1( .. ~ 7 , 1, t-;~ I 7 I 4t; 7 . 7 .• 4f ll, ·7 ">I.If., I 7? 4 7 ·1 . 1.:.0 4 / l ·, 1 ~11 n 7'.47.~ . .'7 !., .. ,,. ~· 7 ~ 111 .. 7 ! 4 7!, .. 7 l ,, 11 . 7? '• 7 ,, .' 7 .• L, ·1q !' 7:,11 f· •• . 1? ",. l . 7 :· '1J; • 7? '•. ~ 7 I 4 ~If ;.7 '4' ':'> ·' 1 _l, /1 1. I~ . 7.: '• 1' 1 7 .' 4.' ''· 7: t.. '·': '· 7: 4 ,,:,, 7 .' '• .. 1 •. 7 ~ ,, ";: 7 .. ,, '• .'· . 7., ,, ·;1, ( . ! . . -.JI ''I " I : .. ,. ! . . . l' /. I I 1 : L l'fi'·l'~~~.1 1 .• c, :,: II ~/1·,/''~· 1·;.;.;! =..t 11,·;y l•.IJl11:n-,,, 4 •, .,:.1, ':;.:.Jf.:.T!.i'i ij~.T•tff~~ di-(.l•f•i"(f f"'ilJ1-JTY \,' .. .... .. . . \. .. ~ r '•I l I · . I;•·"'-1 < " I;· \I I l... ,.. ' I I:. l f 1, !-f I C. I I Y C 1 .. c • . 1 t ( L ~ ?.,1< , '\' 1 11/ r: r; .. 1. f• I I.. I I. l I :. ~· ~" • C.: l t. • 11 f C 1P ~ T 'f I 1•: I CU JI• 11, I ~ 1 r:.1.~ .... , re., 1:.r. (' () ~;f. ~ l l CI I \t !-t (}I I. 1 ("II·.·: CL I! t H f: f L f f. TF. I ft. L I I ' 1 • cur.<.nL ILt.lf!. ~·~ri't•l1CllflF:~ r f. I. T ,:. C: l '. I : • H t; I ~~ T I I l c 1) I r If'. ! j. I n I· t. I • I A Hi ;. co··~·ti"\ [fl1(t·Y ~r11v1rrs rr;~.JL r:~~)t. tillT11 J:/.Rlf.t 11\.f. i< • f • r 1i u L 1 r r r P " 1 • f F. r r. 1 r L r;0iu1!1v .:11ct t.~t.u rL re rue. r ; 1 u ': 11.11 · "· .. •: !.. r. c 1 t 1 r :.. C 4 l. ~J Al· !• (Ol!'·: 1 Y fiF '· r ,, N rT Cu 1< l I :l.J ;~ t. T 11 r ~ G ;._ s C' 1 1 N I t F J r ',, T r TI • • t-r q H tit• fl! J I• r: fl 11. ~ I 11 \} T I, :, :; [J l • . I I j.f :; ; I( v I ( I r.r_L.-t•I ~ .. y•·t·fo'~, 1r:r. '..II c i< "r;, ~. ;. ~ ~ 1 v r fd·r: uc 1 ... r". r. I <:I r. .. , ... i. l I ~ t. ~-rr ":. y ~-Tl t. -.; ' l :.·r • I' :t .. t • •ll: > f f, • , I r, ('. • r •. I v : .. r .': l I r c c I I ! 1 . .. ( • lJ; . :: •: r I • f l I j. Jr (' T ' 1.:. ll u' 'r 1 l I •• :. o1 ~ C ; i~ I • f'IH iiF1T re. Li II " L L ~... "· t. L I ~ c (' • I (," Ii ifl I • I : l'. Lr.! i 11/. I . 1 , l• I 1 •• i ,•; l f '-'.I ·~ :· (I:. I ; •I: II~ .. , I\ J "L ~, l I v • ~·. : ... I-t ., I L I I "1 ,-I I I ·. SI, F t l ' r l I. r r: f, L I ,. . 1, r ~ ·:. r l.•IC r • Flt•~r i.Lt..:·····lVri..C.'Ct.1 Cr.., li•I.'. IJ(fH!",.' 1 .. ;.1!~ (('. fl~··~·" (1)'),.0t:. I J'.••f"f· •.f tt ~ T II 11-(';. fl.II !>.. \'~.'JIC.ll (1·~~(1<t IL f Li Y L •• r. :;1 :. ! Cf(. • ,J • \'. r L ~i 1 '' 1: -• ••• 1 J tJ.. :; ,. ~. 1 ,,. c: I 1 1: ~ •.' • •• "" '. f (..·I ~. !. y 11·~ f,p. l'·r C.u~ ., Cl•; :) •'·IL .~/;_; :/l'i~ '·hl1lJrJf '!.1 t4'?f..:1 1t i:?').:12 ., ') l i·. 4 7 I J l 7. I~ I. \l'i4 •hi' '127~.7~ 1.c,~, ,J. :; (' 01.1~ £ I , ;6 2 •. ~ l ... s. ·' 'l 2. 4? '1.? 14h. ~,4 H'5 l • 76 1.1'1.87 't.2u?.q7 i2tl52.f'8 ~.~46. ·''-l ~ 1 t f.. ) 1 e ,I tJ l HCJ.t,r. 'J, 7 ~. ,• tl ~1'+9.1.)2 :t8 'I•" ~I $3 7. ~ll :t?,q7 )ece 14~7.tj'.'l 1173.'12 t l ')~~.~,. :t t? •• ) :! • : '; i? ~. '. r. l,S,.:,11.1£' 'fl.I76 •. i6 'j.!'°1 3 •ti ;I il??.,..f 1(.~C"t.7(: 1l'i7.H. L,.~;b • 1? ·r l42.1? ·~ l l 2. _. ~· :1.11d.'i'I l 4 • l1(. 7 e ,I ~I 'I .\ \ :, • f "' 'J.j ·)·:: 4 'I 'It\~! • ~. r 1 7 • • 7 ':) • 7 r1 'H't?.l•f> J ~ , 4 , '3. •' Ii I · ,., 1•''1• ( f•r <)( h I!= TI uN USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT EMPLOYEE MILEAGE CONCRETE HARDWARE EMPLOYEE MEETING EXPENSE FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECTION EHGINE REPAIR TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BLUEPRINTING REPRODUCTIONS PUBLI CA Tl ON TRUCK REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS CRANE RENTAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CSDOC #1,6,7 MASTER PLAN UPDATE WATER SOFTENER RENTAL PERMIT FEE LAB SUPPLIES PUBLICATION LEGAt ADVERTISING TRUCK PARTS COMPUTER SERVICE SAFETY SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS APPRAISAL SERVICE DRIVER TESTING TRUCK REPAIRS PAINT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES • OFF I CE SUPPLI ES TRUCK PARTS PI PE SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES OELIVERY SERVICE PAINT SUPPLIES PI PE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS LAB SUPPLIES ASPHALT CUTTING CONTRACTOR PW-132 PUMP PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ., ( I ,·! 'I "'! ·,! 1., 1,: I I" ! .• I ',,,I 11i ;:·1 ".i , ·I :! ,I ... ( ~ ( ~ \11 HIND ti:O 'Jl'<tl -JT ~Jl~l ~·c;.;i-1·~1 c:.1 11..t 1 r·C•llc::5 l!~t i•.:.J:: ~/ir-n:r ~fFG~T ~UNPl~ Af•3 ("::i.'!•:lY ~;,(' llld JlJP.J f•JST~lf.Jj ()f rif:ll"uF ffillr!TY I !, (;; -~tRRALT ~O. \f~~Ok ~ I a !'173495 FRUIT r~ou:1.~ LALtOf<f:Tld•Y, lt·C. r-01-J4~Et ----·----CITY OF FULLE~l0"-1 1 10 r.17~497 c.y f'1t.Jr-<1cru.rn[. H·t. ' 11 ll73't98 G~r.At•L LU"'rtl' c11. ll C.7·~·45') (',~~; CtlP. 1 1 f<Or1Ul:Tf,' u,!(. 073!H1'J .G[t,(l'H TllH ... Ot,;f C.O. 0 7 ~ 5 0 1 G If' ~ Ll 01 ·I·! I TC t 1 f L L t )tJ C • llH ·~ -0~502-------W•'°1• (;kt.Jr~GfP, INC. 0 7 3 5 0 3 (, [OR C [ T • t• t. LL C 0. 073504 HALPRI~ SUFrLv co. 111 ·-··· -07350o ----·· h.\LST£r: ~ t-ic1GGtN, u~c. 073506 TED A. t•Al-':-"fll ·~ Jill .. )110 ~73~~7 HAHHl~~TO~ J~DUSTHJAL PlASIJrs i------u.1.J§.(1ll--·-·----HASTY .&.LI f..~~f.NJ 07.35C9 HEHSEY Pl'OnUtT~. Jl>JC. U735lC! HILJl1 l~C. i.....__--1173£.11 --------tlOUSl · f;f t•t.TH~ I[~ u735l2 Cl T'Y Of ttUtHitlGTOfl• 1-:l.t.C~! Q 7 3 51 3 II u tH I ~ (. T 0 '" H EA c H r~ u ~ B lfl s T "' r 1-----011~§14 HGO-CW~PAfo.Y --·-·------ n :::: 073!il5 IP.IPf.RJH IJESl CllHiJCAl CO. ') I" tP G 7 ~ !116 HI 0 lJ S TP I A L A SF It A L T lU .J,;.-.. ----0 7 351 7 ~··-··-··-·----l NUUr; TI~ JAL F H ( & S Tr [l " :::: 0735lb INOUST~IPL THPCAOlO fRh~~Clf 073519 INSHAM PAPLR i-----u»929 IN-~·LH( 1-!J.ntH,JN(!-ro.--- N 073521 IN5TRurE~TATIO~ LAA0R~TORY1l~t .•In C73~22 lNT[PtJ/.TIOf·,t.L TECHIVf.LflGY ,, -----01.3~"23 · ·-.. lllVJN( i~At.:Ch WAl[fl PlSHlCJ J'. 07 3524 Htl JI. I\ 11 l:f.. s SHrirr [ n ~73525 JEN~[N TOCLS t ALLOY~ J3 07-352b 40 ti H u 073527 C73520 0~~29 C73531) (173~31 ·~1 c 1-~532 ., n 1~1 ti [ ... , . .. '!_ __ n3~n "7 35~4 07"5.~5 67~5~6 r.73~·37 -o 7 J.f',~.o rn~~.'J 0 7 ~!"1'1 LI -------G.E. Jf PSON n1v. -- l• .P • J( t!N Iii.UL I NG JOll!fS Cllf!"ICtL·~, l~C. K A~~ t.f~ (' t A ll ltw r, s ~ !) u Vi L ' KAS SHE.TY f·POiiUCTS t<r.l °'iAN rI Pf ~ ~.UPIL't r C. I< 11.11; -ti l t.11 I•• G, I I'\· C.. t< I. t L. ~. -L 1 I·• f C ('If\ I M11f 1 l< I'rnlJ';J~Jl'll !:llf·H.Jf<; l ~ ~ uq1rr.11M ~lJll L'I' (L L • J • ~ • ': • , I , .. C • t. f « r~ r~ "11o1 ll, !f.J r • l f \.l cci 1 u n ,_ I c r. o • L I '".ti l I I t ~If q k l t· U l 11 t· $ t L I l. L Y I Y I· i ~ r l T I f.11, 11. (. l: I. I l r• 5 ~· A I l} l .~ I~ .I I<~ •) ./.t-111u1~ I 1.3 } ... !I ~2.3.t'• J.lf 1. l'7 1~.~14.cb lilt·:A:)•t•t• u,1.11.~1 s.115,.1n9.2't 't.'J.l.t-1 t-?~6 • .?4 'HCi7. Jn i't94.&'t ! 2 J. J6 7. ;. ,. S37BebA i .!lq 0. 7 l 1.136.70 t.153.32 $l tl5:1.~(! S.6,325.77 !. 7. 3 J 11~&.fH 13,fi11.lls 1.54. !:15 'tl 2 '3. 7'+ !.9 3. 7C 001.2~ ! 't • 8 l !l. j\ ;J ~ fi9 J. If 'I :1·951f •·in '£.it. u1' J.l •l.3. r.c; $1)9. :jf, $11~26.3'.1 $2.t:.l2.t•7 1?.t~07eG6 s.qlt. ti'i t 14 3. •, j tJ,725.~C S't,}bG.l .. :l 'l •I• 11 f. '!.B 1 •-.? Sd , ~1·l2 • f 1 'i ?. :l'j. If 7 t~ ~. -·.!· 1 7'.'2.r:a S. I , ~ 1 :., • ;· 1 ·J l H "l. "· 1: (1C: ... Cf. lf-T !"N LAB SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE REPAIR GAS PUMP LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES SAWDUST TELEPHONE BUDD CHAIN BOILER PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES PUHP PARTS VACUUM TRUCKING ENGINE PARTS TRUCK REPAIR VALVES HARDWARE BATTERIES WATER USEAGE OFF I CE SUPPLIES . Ef f~TNEA~ HtUG~\ bts ASPHALT TOOLS HARDWARE OFFICE SUPPLIES REPAIR ENGINE LAB SUPPLIES COMPUTER TERMINAL WATER USEAGE JANITORAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PW-083 SAWDUST CHEMICALS BEARINGS SAFETY SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES BEARINGS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PROPANE UNIFORM RENTAL WELDING SUPPLIES FILM PROCESSING TRUCK REPAIR ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PRINTING .. · (. • ' '.l 'I r1 )• '·1• I I , .. I ·j ::i .1 •i j .. '.I ! .. :I 1.: i'' ~ : !J 'I ., , ..... "' H•NO f.Cl <, 1 c· r. •· .J T r i I S 1 ~;Ci·~ I: l· r :.1 11 q I ,, or I ~ ::; I H. i),, If ~ 11 ~ I ~ !. I ~ 1, I '• '""-•1 111 o,q f,lJ"l~·r:r ~•·'-:.' r111t.,Ty ~1 ... JlJlJ11r·· 1.JST"'lfl:) Of-Cl?f.t,1(f fflllf'rl'I' : : I IJ A~ R ldn I·. 0 • vt r.i.or. ·1 • (17 ?-~41 '--·--·-. 0 7 ~!)4 2 ..... . L I M I T 0 i ·• l' L C ctn • L 0 C /.il '• C. l t~ f V F I; R M ~ T J 0 \ C (.I'd ~·\Cl' F 1 UCI< ~., J r,c • IQI' (. 7 ~ !>lt3 ':II C7 :! !''tit !., . C7J~45 Mf\LCC:f' i l"!\'H, INC. l.1:--. 117 .... ~l.t() }ju[! f,7;547 ,.'.Am; m" H r: 1: N n L n r. J r ~ , 1 fl; c • MA~VtC rl[CTR~~ICS I\ ----c. 7 351tP ~ C C 0 y· ~, t l F. ( T r-! [ 1 A L '°' (,JI I' S t l I f • LA~HY ~. HCLl~~~[ ~C~ASTf~·Ct~~ ~UFFL~ ro. f'ITC~[LL ~A~UALS, I~C. MUl'dH.Kt lt:C .• IL f 7 ~ 5lf I'\ !111 r.n.~50 IC • .. .. C7 !551 "I n135s2 )11•1 ;)73553 f'O~TGOHf~Y fLf~~T0P COPP&NY f-10!\ G~N CfU. t~E Co., I ~:C • 11 l.3~5/i. t<1YfHS ll1U Sl•J>ILY , 1 11 rn ei1 ~!J55 NA 11 o~Jt.L r 1LH11 Mln it rord··. ... u 2 o7!>556 Ror~rn1 r11£ .H • 11 .........---l.17~~57 ·--r-. Nf.\,;lRK (LCCTROt~IC5 "b:1 073~50 CITY Of-l\l[wf'Cll\T flfACt~ =i Ci73559 NOkTtiW(ST •"OlOf? WELl>JNC, H.f. ll ai356U.-·------·OCClr.£ri.;JJ.L r..-.r.,lCAL ((;lcP. ~ Q73f61 OLYMPIC CHEHJC~L CO. b:1 073~62 O. C. HflkMATIVf. HTIOM ... -k_.... Li 73~63 --.. .,_, ___ -.. ()fl A lliC[ f.'(;l!l\:T'f C.lff MJ(' Al C 0 • tt ~ ~7356~ GkANGC V~LV( ~ FITTING CO. .JUI l~J ... C7 ~5G5 ORCO BLOCK CC1., H~C • I (:7~5.66.------05' J .. lf.)I. CORP. . ··-· 07~567 O~~GfN SfKVJC( ~7~!6~ COUNlY 0F OP~NLE !l73~f.9 CO. OF Ol~Af':C.E.-AUOJT(.k CONT1~l1lf\ 073~70 COU~TY SA~JT~lJO~ Dl~lRICT ~73S71 OHANG[ COUNTY U~TC~ DlST~llT .,___ ___ Q..2.35.72.--.. -·---F .t.: .A. Pk J tl;J l NC .. £•73';-73 FACIFIC "'lCt-~ANICAL ~YSTrr-·s (; 7 3 ~. 7't f A ( I F IL <; I' ff H fr, ll H Ji, I ~ T C ii. !17!~75 1·H\TS l.!'.LH.JH:.: 07 ;!.~ 76 F [i-llH L f) ,, TA r. ('li·.11.Uf'll 0 T 1 CH.S (.'or r. 7 3 '5 77 rr H) )( I Ii t T 1 ti r, ~ y n H1 ~. • ] "'t. ----07.!576 n.3~7".l f•7 ~·!'·P Ci ':.7 ~~.1:1 117~.~U:? n7~.5~3 -Cl.3~!\4 1'·7 '! ~·r~ r. 7 3 ~If'. J • Ii • 1· t.l l L H' $ f'O~TMlO::Jf ._. 1·Hr~11rr rr~u~~l~G I /.I~ Cll) l'h I "·i• C1 !' ! I CE "AINHH. fll~H1$/>L er. Ttif J<£1,J~.T1r' _,., .... n£Yt.;C..LI· Al.lit:Jf\;llf~ Sl!fl'l '\' ro. r1r:·1-f'.''lr·f p (II i.J J\ ~. {. :. I V ft• S ::i . ( ...... 1 L --·--.· ~·~ ---··-·· '21 Cl 1, I '"· 5 1 · r. I fl , .\I~· ·11 r. ':'. .e.:.,:iu;•;1 tl .t:~7.lf3 ~ ?5 n. •· f "'75. :'• \ 7 , !B 7 • :. t' $J,£;36.lb 1.121.1:-i 'l)j6.3f1 $ 2:? 7. •,f. :t 615. 2'· "tlHt.JC'. 1175."17 132b.4E: :1.l'16.7i· 1-2?3.F,7 UH,235e3G 'I. 2R ti •. 1(1 u,21,:,.1~ Hlte?CI 'n t:i. !(· S.'ttl92efi'f J.~At'tl't.Kl 'f,.S5. '" ~6.J. f,i) 1.2.3.'l7 11tl21jd2 s.2,s15.~n t';i,736.74 S.?..162.~1 ~ 7't. 27 u. ·~u 1. 7q 2. •) lj 1481.'lt> . . s.i • 1 :J3 • ;rn i::>.'i29.21 1115 •. •.:s u ,a~.<J.11+ •j 15 c. :1 11 !ltt.11(,.f'.t,I I .?<> ;) • "1 I. t?. ';I.•,;.,, l• I!';,'• t-. Ii ii; :i. •t f. '!'1~. I !J !H3.7''1 I;, .l J.t • 7C:- t ?''fl. • '' t l • 1 "~. •; l ( iJft;L;. IF T rnN VALVE LAFCO PROC FEE-ANNEXATION NO. 2-60 TRUCK PARTS ODOR CONTROL CONSULTING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES DUCT WORK EMPLOYEE MILEAGE TOOLS . MANUALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELEVATOR SERVICE SIGNAL CHARTS TRUCK PARTS FILTER BELT CONFERENCE REGISTRATION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE WELDING SUPPLIES ·CHEMICALS CHEMICALS MEMBERSHIP FEE CHEMICALS PIPE SUPPLIES CONTRUCTI ON HA TE R I AL S TRUCK PARTS OXYGEN CONTRACTOR 2-2'6 GATE FEES -'COYOTE CANYON REIHBURSE ~ORKERS COMP. WATER PRODUCTION PRINTING CONTRACTOR J-llR SAFETY SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL REPAIRS HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MONTHLY DEMAND REPORTS. POSTAGE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE TRASH DISPOSAL LEGAL ADVERTISING ALUMINUM COPIER LEASE PLIHP PARTS .. , c· ,j .'i I'' •• 1 I Ii ·: ·! ··i : i 1 .. :1 "I .·1 ·' .1; (11 ,., !" ;1 '.t .,, t ., .... I .'I . i .-. :'\ ( I' 1··1 I' l•~d· t.'(· : ;.: !. t•" I. r. T ... , •• : 7? r !· 1 (. 7 ~.! ;.i: : 7 ,11· I'" '1!~·''.· 7 ... ~ '.' l I 7 ! '. C'.;i 7.' '•? 7 ~· ~ '-l4 . 7 ..,.,': "': I 7 ! I' C..i: : 7 ! ':. '-7 ··7~·~·~h . 7 !·'-':" l:o I 7 ., t '" 1.•:I rn I 7 ·: f~:· ~ . >< ·7:,.:) I I ::c I • • • ; . -"7 ?f .... ~ i o:I . I::.' • '+ 1· -·7'1,,,a; r<.---1 1:1~~.:~ J"i o:I ~ 1 !.V·1 . . I •· 7 "!' · 11 1· .. vi . 1:'l'·'· ,.I: ~ 7 .' f,] , I. ' i ., ~ t-) 1 I ·: .. 1 ... f,1;. i"1 ' 7 .' t 1 '1 •7., 14 i . .: 7: ( 1 ''. 1.:l "1::1, H I · • 7 .· t-J 7 I·' I 7 '1 • l -' . " .,,.. ,., (; 7 ~.( l q i. I~ • 1,.4 i ': ) ~ 7 I ( :, 1 ·q.:-·t·;·;i I .. . 7 ,, ( ~ .~ ·:7'!1.;.·4 I 7 I I,, •. 7 • 1.: f· 7 ?. (. ;· ., 7.' •.~I "{?I ;."• 7 I I .: .. . , 7 .'I· ~ 1 : 7? I 5;· ~, f <II• " .... I I ~"' ( .. , .... JI . l'.T h I ~ir· L•'I I Pl unrr~·r1·~~: ('lllf .~/J'1/l.I· 1·1c1 1; I , . r. fl 1 I. u M ~ [I,; l. I 'I ~ t .. 1 : r. I 'I ~ t. i .. I T :. I I 1 • 1.: " 1 ::-. J t-) C: 1 :~ !) F (\ I-,~ 1.'l-i! C fl H~ I V '<!I., l.i; ,J'1·.:1,, J. 1)t1«cr ..... ~.ct, pr. '..;.I. r,. " ',, I l r ( p! Jc : l l (.I,'.'- ~ ! : ;, ~ • .. I I I I'! H " :. (. c • ~ i ; • ·: rn, . " , ' ; , c • ~ ·1l;.:f.Jf1' "l•"I LY ~ 11 r • H •·. ~ :. rt· J 1 1 ~-v r f·. ~'·llt:-f"liY C'''• ~.M J n. 1 11 1. ,, s t•ri l v, J r .. r ~· o L ,. 1." : c; ;{ 1 ·• ~~'}l•H (';~':':1 i'·ft lff L 1:l!Jl=l-'f ~ T ~1:l'Tl:fl.i~ r:;.t.Jr. L(:l'·M.: er. $ii. CA l If • !. f. l 1 fl f C • ~;i:t•'ll!f.'1·~1 ccur-.T us rill cc•. ~I l. r< 11o LI T 1 ~. IH< J 1,1< H1(. tr: L Tf I• ! i·1 "Lit Ii Jl.'.TPIJl-'tf-;J f•'• ~-r 1: • 1. iJ ~-r r 1.1 ~CL l T ~Ti 'JI~.'> ~0~·:11 ·.tirl ~. U i l L C I , ) I. C • 1 H 1 s u 1 H J r ;, s ~ 11 1• v t. v r :, •. ~ f 1~ v t c ,· c i'. ~ v :_. r.. f,N • Ct.'. l L • l/.,. lAKoil:ltt r:.i.~ . ., r·.~·.1urFrr1c. LU Hld·Y 111~:r-:r$t1l\j L;f(.liti< ft•. J!l/.l.~./'1.ti~Jf.' l•iLt.\'llt Il~t. l r· f, r ~ ~ !. r J ( I • I i. c • r :: •· v L L 11. :. v r L JI, Ur k ·: A lJ I ( ~' UH l 'f , I I . (' • ·•·'. ll••-'1:1: i'. ·:ol\, J'\C:. Im;. t tJ I•·:[ r k I f\1 (,. I f,1(" • J. ., .: '· K l, L 1 ) : : l1'dl:ll l•IL C:. i r r~• Jr. u•, 1 rr 1. 1 ,, , t1 L ·,1 •( v 1 n t·~:JTi.ll 'l'.fl~. lf.lJJf. (<=., !IC. l' r1 I T ( !j ( l ;. 11 ~. I I I f '· f r:u r. f .. " V i.I I ~: f J r jJ T J t J ( \ !. L l t y \.' I T I I ~ • 11 t• I I .,. Li • Vt•L~!, Sll'L ~lJJll., r.· .• r. J !: 1'. £ V '.j' I f'r, f v I .. I r (; r f; 1· I ~· 11 T ~-' ~ T I t ', • 11 I • L t • i '!' " • L " 1 ·• r. ' t. C I / I r ~· , l i • • .. !.tL;.ri ' i11 ,:' n. d '''•~I •1 • \.. '.I l. i •:. l ..\ • 1 ... r ~. 1 ' · ' : • 1 '. 1 ~.r 1 \' 1 " ~· H " Cl ' I 1• ~ I t.. If• . , ~. / ;>. I'~:. r.v. nu.111 'l'l~." ~ i 'l ! 2 ... ;> ! 1 'J ,, • 1 !- ,. ., ~ 3. 1 :· i~.~I ... ~. f.~.~;·1.:t1 l'tlA•'"L '1.)1;~.'tq 1', ,q 1. 'l r1 'I !'>'f ,, • :.;> 1 1 .s :·~ , ~ a ·4 • £-: 4 f.M • 'i't 1 1 ~ • 72 ·) • .! ~· 'lf.;A3 •~It I. 1~4. :? 4 s 7 .; CJ. 1 f· 'H2el6 f.1:'1(..2'! , 5H .• 1 q H.~.35.'!t~ 11:>1.4?· I.~ ·1 l • 7 5 $ 1 , ~ tt ~• • .,1 I i:~,C!41.~f.I !l'ln • .!~ 16 fi. ·~ 7 t~~ • 't ~ 2 • .lO . ·~ 1"l~'.1l t: :i. J , fin 1 • ~· u u. 175. ';5 1<. .2:-,0. '•ft ir.,~~n.:?4 i1:>,;.1'l.', ... 11').S.!U 1''•7.~~ I'·'-~ • t-h 1ltl\J.r1) l~~.~~i'.f:J t ~·, H .' ~ • ., '1 1.'. .1t:~ '·'·7 J. l •• ? •, !•:?) e ., I '!. l :;. t 'J '\ 6 • I (· 1 J • ·~ ,, t. • l ; . • ~ fi 'l •.•. , 11.~~~.47 tJ t_ ~ ( :i 1 P T I ') i\ STEEL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TOOLS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES HARDWARE TRUCK REPAIRS CONTRACTOR PW-119 PIPE SUPPLIES BIO CULTURES TYPEWRITER REPAIR POWER WATER USEAGE DIESEL FUEL BOTTLED WATER ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES STEEL EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ALUMINUM LAB SUPPLIES HARDWAP.E HARDWARE LAB MA I NTE NANCE LANDSCAPING PUMP PARTS E~PLOYEE TRAVEL EXPENSE PAINT SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL REPAIRS AIR FARE TRUCK PARTS TOOLS ENGINEERING CONTRACT NO. 5-26 CONTRACTOR PW-121 GASOLINE DELIVERY SERVICE VALVES PIPE SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES HARDWARE VALVE EMPLOYEE MILEAGE FREIGHT CHARGE~ P2-23-6 CLAIM CONSULTING ruHr PARTS ODOR CONTROL TRUCK PARTS (. .. .... ;'\ )• ·j ,, I .:I ·•I .I :I ; .1 "I ... ·.rn •·I>< r ur.t. r.r i: L !-. f( : :, I , "• . 7 .'I>~ ~. ·: 7 -~ ( •. •.4 . 7 l_ (,'~I ' 7 ~ !; ,,;.... . 7 :. f. ~. 1 7~t:'.B ·_. ! · · r -.Jr :· I.: I ., &.1 " l 1" r: I : Tl I r I.(; ('f <" r: I'·• C (1 !I Ti -~ I J ~ It• ' I ;. ; i ~ i f C. 1• T 1' llt·l • ! r !~ .\ I· .. , ~ r ,, I• ~:.:i lli·l ii "l '·~}ll·JCIS (If ,.,..n(,f (0lJl''l'f \It I · 1, ~. I··'· I.I !:~ .. ::1.i:11 r'(;r ~ "!r·('( 1 IP' 1.tl <.JI ;. l id f· I ;'. l l L(. V I llli~. l\f ·. I~ ( ( !•!• 11f f )'.·I-(; :< ( •lj, ! • l c . J. r. i. '( ;.. ' ; i l i 'f I-~-~-( (' J 1. 1 ;° t 1 J I ll ; 'f [If :-1 't I ! F· ~· 0 r '~; r l t L. ! ,. ~. I /. 1 i ~I:> ! /" ~, /.f.i o.ilifl I 'i :it HY~•"!' 'j ;>:!f.,. 7;, •J 1 ,. ' l' .; ,, • ~ 7 1 lf • ~ 1) 7. l t- i ~d l. 't!' 1.q2.~.4l. rt1f/.l fli Jr,~. If, 11: "!/'; '/1·!. 'i l • 1• lf ..s ' It 7 f:, • ·~ " ======~:========= r.i:: ::. r 1 I ~· 1 I ti i·; REHODELIN~ SERVICE HARDWARE LEGAL SERVICES COPIER LEASE VALVE TEMPORARY HELP ::C: SUMMARY AMOUNT -'to .··~ '·· --t ::: . t:d I , .. !··: I: i ': 1:·: 1. :..: "I I O'l ::: #I ePEft fHH8 $ 1,a)I #2 OPER FUND ~.633.50 #2 F/R FUND 657.30 #3 OPER FUND 11.522.98 #3 F/R FUND I .8lt5.95 #5 OPER FUND 1,390.91' #5 ACO FUND 8.866.2lt A7 OFER FOND S.~9911, #7 F/R FHHB a.31,,os HJ I OPER FUND 6.302.65 JT OPER FUND .51lt 1 562.IO CORF 1,192,512.35 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE FUND 2 • 332. 18 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 91.77~.oo TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 3/20/85 $1,81111,8)2. 51 $1 , A 36, 400. 19 ( .. , . ·' . ( ... \ ''• .. , (' ., ',, . ·1 'i ·j 'l >i •I :·I i:1 ;,,,! .. : ''j .t; .. 1 : ·! I