The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-12-12COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE CEUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAYJ December s, 1984 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 1984 -?-: 30 P·. M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. ~~ Secretary Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE -None Scheduled SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF -At the call of the Joint Chairman December January February March April May June July August September October November December COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Q RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 '..) (714) 540-2910 (714)962·2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings Dec 12, 1984 None Scheduled Jan 9, 1985 Jan 23, 1985 Feb 13, 1985 Feb .27, 1985 Mar 13, 1985 Mar 27, 1985 Apr 10, 1985 Apr 24, 1985 May 8, 1985 May 22, 1985 Jun 12, 1985 Jun 26, 1985 Jul 10, 1985 Jul 24, 1985 Aug 14, 1985 None Scheduled Sep 11, 1985 Sep 25, 1985 Oct 9, 1985 Oct 23, 1985 Nov 13, 1985 None Scheduled Dec 11, 1985 None Scheduled 1 II --~ :iJOA,RDS OF. DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, Califomia 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: JOINT BOARDS - Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA MEETING DATE DECEMBER 12., 1984 -T: 30 p IM I ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM.1 PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION., STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:OU P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation ( 2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items ~ (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as.mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman_: District 1 -November 14, 1984, ~egular District -November 14, 1984, regular • 2 District 3 -November 14, 1984, regular District 5 -November 14, 1984, regular District 6 -November 14, 1984, regular District 7 -November 14, 1984, regular District 11 -November 14, 1984, regular (7) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See page ( s) "A" and "B" I._.,/ ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - Joint Working Capital Fund Self-Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT 11/14/84 $352,137.57 147,892.57 62,004.43 1,737.64 22,894.02 108,128.53 639.30 9,414.71 5,262.04 181.26 10,005.52 $720,297.59 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 9(a) THROUGH 9(r) (9) ALL DISTRICTS 11/28/84 $ 222,928.27 749,616.24 107,030.43 143.26 1,557.20 3,670.59 31,228.67 6,577.20 8,784.40 6,579.12 269, 239. 33 3,675.13 14.35 $1,411,044.19 All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member ·of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- 12/12/84 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, authorizing an addition of $3,546.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for application of concrete adhesive on two engine pads, pouring of concrete curbs and application of epoxy sealant curbs and engine pads and for alterations to the new stainless steel condensate lines. See page •cn (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Primary Sedimentation Basins P and Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26, authorizing an addition of $4,610.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for installation of a new surface drain line and drain box. See page "D" (c) (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for pB and Conductivity Meters for "C" Beadworks Influent Trunks, Job No. PW-118, authorizing an addition of $1,292.00 to the contract with Allen Electric Company for installation of a new electrical pull box, relocation of an existing convenience outlet and an increase in wire size. See page "E" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-198, accepting pH and Conductivity Meters for "C" Headworks Influent Trunks, Job No. PW-118, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "F" (d) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 17904 to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. for Emergency Replacement of an 8-inch Sludge Withdrawal Line on Sedimentation Basin "D 8 at Plant No. 2 (Specification No. M-019), _ increasing the total amount from $11,700.00 to $16,192.51 for additional grouting required to fill a large void under the basin (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-199, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Installation of Repiacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-211 Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No P2-28-11 and Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling Facilities, Job No. P2-28-2, providing for an extension of time for completion of the design work for Job No. Pl-21 from December 14, 1984 to February 14, 1985, at no increase in the total compensation. See page 8 G" (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-200, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase contract for Supplying Chlorine in One-Ton Cylinders, Specification No. C-016, to Jones Chemical, Inc. in the amount of $169.00 per ton (estimated annual cost -approximately $123,370.00 plus tax) See page "B" -3- 12/12/84-. (9) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (g) Consideration of motion approving Familian Pipe & Supply as the successor-in-interest to Kelly Pipe & Industrial Supply for purchase of Pipe, Valves and Fittings, Group II (Pipe -Galvanized and Black), Specification No. P-065, awarded by the Boards in ~ September 1984 (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Conunittee to negotiate an agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for design of Rehabilitation of Primary Basins D & E at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-29 (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Conunittee to negotiate an agreement with Kennedy/Jenks Engineers for design of Rehabilitation of Domes and Installation of Sludge Pump Mixing Systems for Digesters E and B at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-30 (j) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an Addendum No. 5 to the agreement with John Carollo Engineers re design of Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, to provide for preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Manual DISTRICT 2 (k) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-202-2, ordering annexation of .SOS acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Pl~asant Place and Wildan Road in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 42 -Ramsamooj Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "I" ~c DISTRICTS S & 6 (1) (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Slide Gate Installation, "A" and "B" Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-21-lRl, authorizing a time extension of 37 calendar days to the contract with John T. Malloy and John T. Malloy, Inc., a Joint Venture, due to a delay in the delivery time required for the five slide gates See page "J8 • (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-203, accepting Slide Gate Installation, "A" and "B" Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-21-lRl, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "K" DISTRICT 7 (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-204-7, ordering annexation of lo24 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Glen Albyn Lane and Rancho Santiago Boulevard in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 92 -Guzman Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "L" -4- . ~ 12/12/84 (9) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) (n) Consideration of motion to receive and file request from Ors. Kesho and Kamla Burria for annexation of 1.07 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Acre Place in unincorporated County territory1 and consideration of Resolution No. 84-205-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation No. 121 -Burria Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (City of Orange is the local sewering entity). See pages "M" and "N" (o) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Connnittee to negotiate an Addendum to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Main Street Relief Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2C-4, for additional services to provide for Irvine Ranch Water District participation in the construction of said project (cost of additional design work to be reimbursed to District by IRWD) (p) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Connnittee to negotiate an Addendum to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of South Irvine Lift Station and Relief Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-7, for additional services to provide for Irvine Ranch Water District participation in the construction of said project (cost of additional design work to be reimbursed to District by IRWD) (q) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the Selection Conunittee certification re final negotiated fee in connection with Addendum No. 3 to the Engineering Services Agreement with· Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, providing for surveying services during construction of said project. See page "O" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-206-7, approving Addendum No. 3 to the Engineering Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, providing for surveying services during construction of said project, on a per diem basis, including profit and overhead, for an amount not to exceed $41,064.00, increasing the total compensation from $194,230.00 to $235,294.00. See page "P" (r) Consideration of motion to receive and file Sunnnons and Cross Complaint for Indemnification and Declaratory Relief relative to Case No. 16 23 53, Continental Property Management Company, et al. vs. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., in connection with two previous claims for alleged damages due to a sewer backup at the Versailles on the Lake apartment complex located at 3600 South Plaza Drive, Santa Ana, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items removed from consent calendar, if any -5- 12/12/84 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the CoDDDittee's written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Items re Report and Recommendations of Malcolm-Pirnie, Inc. re Odor Mitigation at Plants Nos. 1 and 2: p. -. (1) Verbal report of consultant, Malcolm-Pirnie, Inc. re Odor Situation Assessment and Recommended Plan (2) Consideration of actions on Odor Situation Assessment and Recommended Plan: (a) Consideration of motion approving Malcolm Pirnie Odor Situation Assessment and Recommended Plans for Plants Nos. 1 and 2J directing that the Plant No. 1 recommendations be modified to include full covers for the Plant No. 2 primary sedimentation basins similar to Plant No. 2J and declaring intent to implement said recommendations, as modified, with respect to retrofitting of existing treatment works with odor control facilities (b) Consideration of motion declaring policy to include odor mitigation measures in future treatment works construction (c) Consideration of motion directing staff to prepare a detailed implementation plan and schedule including scopes of work for necessary engineering services to accomplish the adopted l.._.J long-term odor mitigation recommendations (d) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to direct K. P. Lindstrom, Inc., consultant engaged to prepare the EIR for the Master Plan of Joint Works, to include the Malcolm Pirnie recommendations, as modified by the Directors, in the EIR (e) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Malcolm Pirnie for services to optimize efficiency of existing foul air scrubbers and to prepare standard operating practices (b) Consideration of motion adopting policy of negotiating with Redevelopment Agencies for funding of Districts• services to redevelopment project areas, and authorizing the staff to enter into negotiations with each agency using the following priority ranking of the alternatives as a guideline in the negotiations, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee: (See also enclosed report of General Counsel) (1) Pass through of incremental tax revenues for all project areas (2) Issuance of industrial waste permits to all commercial and industrial users within each project area, and levy of a user fee on residences within each project area (3) Direct negotiations to discuss costs and select an appropriate alternative on a project-by-project basis (ITEM 12 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) -6- ,; • ~ 12/12/84 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (c) Consideration of actions re purchase and installation of Parkson/Wyss Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers for retrofitting remaining nine Plant No. 1 Secondary Treatment aeration basins for improved. treatment and operational efficiency: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to exercise the option in the agreement with Parkson/Wyss to negotiate a purchase of Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers, and Appurtenant Piping and Fittings (Specification No. E-144-1) for consideration by the Boards (estimated cost $451,000) (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit bids for the purchase of Blower Surge Protection Instrumentation (Specification No. E-144-2) for consideration by the Boards (estimated cost $26,000) (3) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit bids for Installation of Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers and Appurtenant Equipment (Specification No. M-020) for consideration by the Boards (estimated cost $253,000) (d) Consideration of actions re Phase 3 Physical/Chemical Advanced Primary Treatment Process: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to proceed with Phase 3 of a Physical/Chemical Study for a full-scale evaluation of the physical/chemical process using ferric chloride and polymer at Plant No. 2, for a total cost not to exceed $269,000 (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to purchase up to three different anionic polymers for evaluation in Phase 3 Physical/Chemical Treatment Process study (Specification No. P-071) for an amount not to exceed $30,000 (included in above total of $269,000) (e) Consideration of actions re Retrofitting of Rectangular Sedimentation Basin Chains, Sprockets and Appurtenances at Plant No. 2 : (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate a contract with Gerlich-Mitchell, Inc. for Purchase of the Proprietary Budd Chain System (Specification No. E-160) to retrofit the remaining 11 secondary clarifiers and three primary clarifiers at Plant No. 2, for consideration by the Boards (estimated cost $1,445,000) (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to prepare plans and specs and solicit bids for Removal of the Existing Deteriorated Chain and Installation of the Replacement Budd Chain System (Specification No. M-021) for consideration by the Boards (estimated cost $420,000) (f) Consideration of motion approving continuation of services of White, Fine and Verville to provide assistance re legislation for the research project for deep ocean disposal of sludge from January 1985 through June 1985, and increasing the total maximum compensation from $100,000 to an amount not to exceed $145,000 -7- 12/12/84 (13) Items relative to proposed formation of District No. 14: ALL DISTRICTS (a) verbal report of Select Committee to Advise the Staff on agreement with ~ IRWD re formation of proposed District No. 14 (b) Consideration of action, if any, on Committee reconunendations DISTRICT 7 ONLY (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine Ranch Water District, dated November 19, 1984, agreeing to pay the sum of $867,696.00 to the District for their incremental share of construction of the von Karman Trunk Sewer, Schedule "A", Contract No. 7-8, awarded to Steve Bubalo Construction Company by the Board on November 14, 1984. See page "Q" (d) Verbal report of staff and General Counsel on feasibility of modifying the construction contract for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8 to delete capacity for District No. 14/IRWD in the Von Karman reach, as requested by IRWD (e) Consideration of actions, if any, on staff/General Counsel/Committee recommendations (14) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter submitted by Bettie Nosek received November 21, 1984, relative to the request of Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) to pretreat and dispose of groundwater\.i.J from the Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site. See page "R" . (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Resolution No. 5465 adopted by the City of Huntington Beach on November 19, 1984, relative to the Districts accepting the pretreated groundwater from the Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site and requesting prior completion of an Environmental Impact Report by the California Department of Health Services on SAWPA's proposal. See page "S" (c) Verbal report from Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority re status of compliance with conditions established by the Boards relative to proposal to pretreat and then dispose of Stringfellow groundwater (15) ALL DISTRICTS Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) DISTRICT 1 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion· to adjourn (18) DISTRICT 2 Other business or COll'Dllunications or supplemental agenda items, if any -8- / ' j~ 12/12/84 (19) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 3 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 5 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 6 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 7 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 11 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any '..I (29) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- _. ,_ MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 l 0844 Ellis Avenue Founta in Valley, Calif., 92708 Te le phones: of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date December 12, 1984 -7:30 p .m. Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. To minimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments in the Manager's Report, we have expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself, particularly with regard to change orders and contracts which have been publicly bid and are within the contract budget or engineer's estimate. Detailed change orders are included in the supporting material as well as the bid tabulations for the contracts being recommended for award. ALL DISTRICTS No. 9(a): Approval of Change Order No. 6 to Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Plant No . 2, Job No . P2-25-2. Change Order No. 6 covers two items of work and adds $3,546 t o the contract. The work includes application of a concrete adhes ive on two engine pads before pouring of concrete curbs and applications of epoxy sealant to the inside of the curbs and the engine pads to avoid water leakage between the old concrete and the new. Also included is the alteration of a 2" stainless steel condensate return line necessary to keep steam from backf lowing into an overhead excess steam condenser . Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 adding $3,546 to the contract. There i s no time e x tension associated with this changed work. .. r 12 /12/84 No. 9(b): Approval of Change Order No . 5 to Primary Sedimentation Basins P & Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26. Change Order No. 5 adds $4,610 to the contract for installation of a new surf ace drain line and drain box to drain the area between the truck wash facility and the added pav ing on the east side of the new basins. This drain line runs across the area to be paved on this contract and ties into a new manhole on the Bushard Trunk. Staff believed t h at it was prudent to do this work under this contract in order to avoid incurring higher costs at a later date when extra excavation and paving would have been involved . Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 adding $4,610 to the contract. There is no time extension associated with the extra work. No. 9(c): Approval of Change Order No. 1 to pH and Conductivity Meters, Job No. PW-118 and Acceptance of Job as Complete . Cl) Change Order No. 1: Change Order No. 1 covers three items of work and adds $1,292 to the contract. The work includes installation of a new electrical pull box, installation of conduit and wire to relocate an existing convenience outlet and installation of increased wire sizes in order to safely carry the loads in the new meter vaults . Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $1,292 to the contract . There is no time extension associated with this Change Order . C2> Closeout: The Contractor, Allen Electric Company, has fu l fi l led all contractual obligations within the specified and authorized extended time to install f ive pH and fi v e conductivity meters to aid in the monitoring of incoming f lows and i n dustrial waste discharges. The staff recommends adoption of the resolution a t tached to the agenda material authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, e x ecution of the final closeout agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. There was one change order to this contract (Change Order No. 1 described herein) totaling $1,292.00 for a final amended contract price of $54,692.00. No . 9(d): Approval of Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 17904 for Emergency Replacement of an 8" Sludge Withdrawal Line on Sedimentation Basin D at Plant No. 2, Specificat i on No. M-019. In November, the Boards ratified the act i on o f t he Genera l Manager in issuing an emergency pur c hase order to r e pair an 8" sludge draw off line on Sedimentation Basin D at P l ant No . 2 . -2- ... ~·-- 12/12/84 During the course of the repairs it became evident that a significant amount of additional grouting would be required to fill in a large void that had developed under the basin. This work was not apparent at the time the staff received the written quotations to perform the emergency repair work. The action appearing on the agenda is to approve Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 17904 to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. to add a sum of $4,492.51 to cover the cost of the additional grouting required to fill the void. The staff recommends approval of Change Order A in the amount of $4,492.51 No. 9(e): Approval of Addendum No . 1 to Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-21. In June, the Directors approved an agreement with John Carollo Engineers to install a total of nine belt filter presses at Plants No . 1 and 2 to replace nine existing worn-out and inefficient sludge dewatering centrifuges. Four of the presses are to be installed at Plant No. 1 with the remaining five designated for installation at Plant No. 2. The original agreement, executed in June of 1984, provided a strict time schedule allowing six months from the date of the Notice to Proceed (expiring December 14, 1984) for completion of the design report and plans and specifications for the replacement of the presses at Plant No. 1. Staff requested the engineer to delay the work to coordinate any forthcoming applicable recommendations of the Malcolm Pirnie odor control study with regard to scrubbing systems, as well as to include additional electrical reliability systems in the plans . The ·staff is therefore recommending that Addendum No. 1 be executed providing for a time extension for Job No . Pl-21 from December 14, 1984 to February 14, 1985 at no increase in the total compensation. No. 9Cf): Award Specification No. C-016, Supply ing Chlorine in One-Ton Cylinders. On November 20th, three bids were received to furnish and deliver chlorine in one-ton containers for a one year period beginning January 14, 1985. The bid price per ton varied from a high of $199 to a low of $169, exclusive of sales tax, submitted by Jones Chemicals, Inc . of Torrance. The bid price is $24 (approx imately 17%) per ton higher than the expiring contract. The one-ton cylinders are only utilized for odor control in remote areas of the plants with a low usage rate. The estimated annual quantity of chlorine in one-ton cylinders based on present usage is 730 tons representing an estimated annual cost under -3-" ... ~-- { I 1 ,,,.-' 12/12/84 this contract of approximately $123,370 plus sales tax for the coming year. The Districts also have a separate bulk chlorine contract for the majority of the chlorine needs at the two treatment plants. The staff recommends award of specification No. C-016 to Jones Chemicals, Inc. of Torrance for their low bid amount of $169 per ton plus sales tax. No. 9(g}: Approving Familian Pipe and Supply as Successor- In-Interest to Kelly Pipe and Industrial Supply. In September, the Directors awarded a purchase order to Kelly Pipe and Industrial Supply for furnishing and delivering pipe, valves and fittings for a one year period beginning September 15, 1984. Subsequently, through a letter received by the Districts in November and telephone conversations with the company, the staff has been informed that Familian Pipe and Supply is the successor-in-interest to Kelly Pipe and Industrial Supply. In order to revise the purchase order to enable the processing of payments for supplies purchased, it is necessary to officially change the Districts' records to reflect the new owner, Familian Pipe and Supply. The staff recommends approval of this change. No-. 9(h): Authorizing the Selection Committee to Negotiate with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, for Design of Rehabilitation of Primary Basins D and E at Plant No. 2 , Job No. P2-29. In October, 1983 the Boards approved an agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for prepa r ation of plans and specifications for Rehab il itation of Primary Basins F & G at Treatment Plant No . 2. The work included rebuilding the basins with new fiberglass baffles, we irs and collection mechan i sms and performing necessary concrete repairs , piping revisions and painting and electrical work. The design has now been completed and a contract was awarded in to perform the work. After reviewing the next scheduled basin rehabilitation job with the Selection Committee, the staff is recommending that the Committee be authorized to negotiate with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for the design of the next two primary basins CD & E) which need similar rehabilitation work. Because of the intense learning curve that was involved in design of the initial rehab il itat i on efforts, the staff be lieves that the Selection Committee could n egotiate a very favorable contract directly with Lee & Ro . The repairs to Basins D & E should be made as soon as possible to avoid high maintenance costs or a major breakdown which would severely impair our operational capabilities. , -4..; '---- -12/12/84 The staff recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for Rehabilitation of Primary Basins D & E at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-29. No. 9(i): Authorizing the Selection Committee to Negotiate an Agreement for Design of Rehabilitation of Domes and Installation of Sludge Pump Mixing Systems for Digesters E and H at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-30. In December, 1983 the Boards approved an agreement with Kennedy Jenks Engineers for preparation of plans and specifications for the rehabilitation of certain digesters at Plants No. 1 and 2. The work included installation of high velocity pump mixing systems on all six digesters similar to those installed under recent contracts for new digesters which have proven to be highly successful in minimizing scum build-up. Also included was the casting of new steel and gunite domes over the severely cracked existing domes, and sealing of annular spaces to avoid gas escape on steel domed digesters. This design is almost complete and bids will be received in January, 1985. The staff has reviewed the next scheduled digester rehabilitation job with the Selection Committee and is recommending that the Committee be authorized to negotiate with Kennedy Jenks Engineers for the design of the rehabilitation of the domes and sludge mixing systems for Digesters E & H which is similar to the work already performed on the steel domed digesters. Digesters E & H are now out of service because of gas leaks and other problems . These digester rehabilitation jobs incorporate many of the types of repairs and modifications recommended in the recent Odor Situation Assessment and Recommended Plan prepared by Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., the Districts' odor mitigation consultant. Because of Kennedy Jenks Engineers' previous experience and their familiarity with the digester rehabilitation work due to the involvement in design on the initial rehabilitation efforts, staff believes that a favorable cost could be negotiated with the same engineer. The staff, therefore, recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate with Kennedy Jenks Engineers for Design of Rehabilitation of Domes and Installation of Sludge Pump Mixing Systems for Digesters E & H at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-30 . -5- - 12/12 /84 No . 9(j): Authorize the Selection Committee to Negotiate Addendum No. 5 with John Carollo Engineers for Preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Manual for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2. In June, 1979 the Di r ectors approved an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for det ailed design work , construction and assistance in the preparation of an operations and maintenance manual for hydraul i c reliability and flow equalization facilities at Plant No. 2. The original contract provided fees for the design and provided that fees for the construction services and O & M manual would be set forth in addenda to the contract to be e x ecuted at a later date. Addendum No. 4 was subsequently issued in September, 1983, for the construction services . The project is nearing completion and it is now appropriate to consider an addendum to provide for preparation of the operations and maintenance manual. The hydraulic reliability project is a grant funded project and the preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Manual is a requirement on all grant funded jobs . The staff is, therefore, recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate an addendum to the agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Manual for the Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No . P2-2 5-2 . DISTRICT NO. 2 No. 9(k): Ordering Annexation No. 42, Ramsammoj Annexation, to County Sanitation District No. 2. This .505 acre annexation is for the connection of an e xisting residence to the sewer facil i ty in the vicinity of Pleasant Place and Wildan Road in the City of Anaheim. The local sewering agency wi ll be the City of An aheim. . -- T h e annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement wi th the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties. S t aff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda material ordering Annexation No. 42. DI STRICTS NO. 5 & 6 No . 9(1): Approval of Change Order No. 1 to Slide Gate Installation, "A" and "B " Trunk Sewer, Contract No . 5-21-lRl; and Acceptance of Job as Complete. (1) Change Order No. 1: Change Order No . 1 is a no cost cha nge order which allows the contractor an additional 37 ca l endar -6 - -... 12/12/84 days to complete the work. This time extension is the result of delivery time required for the receipt of the five slide gates to be installed on this project. The staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1. (2) Closeout: The Contractor, John T. Malloy and John T. Malloy, Incorporated, has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and authorized extended time for the installation of slide gates on the "A" and "B" Trunk Sewer. The staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material authorizing acceptance of the job as complete, execution of the final closeout agreement, and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. There was one change order to this contract (Change Order No. 1 above) for a time extension only for this $51,000 contract. DISTRICT NO. 7 No. 9(m): Ordering Annexation No. 92, Guzman Annexation, to County Sanitation District No. 7. This 1.24 acre annexation is for the connection of two single family dwellings in the vicinity of Glen Albyn Lane and Rancho Santiago Boulevard in the City of Orange. The local sewering agency will be the City of Orange. The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties. Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda material ordering Annexation No. 92. No. 9Cn): Receive, File and Initiate Proceedings for Annexation No. 121, Hurria Annexation, to County Sanitation District No. 7. The District has received a request from Ors. Kesho and Kamla Hurria to annex 1.07 acres of territory located in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Acre Place in unincorporated County territory. The property is an existing single family residence and the owners wish to connect to the sewer system in lieu of installing septic facilities. The local sewering agency is the City of Orange. All annexation acreage fees and processing charges have been paid . The staff recommends that Annnexation No. 121 be received filed and adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material authorizing initiation of proceedings for Annexation No. 121 . -7- • and • . 12/12/84 No. 9(o)(p): Authorizing the Selection Committee to Negotiate Addenda to the Agreements with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Design of the Main Street Relief Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2C-4 and for Design of the South Irvine Lift Station and Relief Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-7. At the November Board meeting, the Directors approved in concept an agreement with the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) regarding the proposed formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 to serve IRWD territory. In addtion to capacity required in the Von Karman Trunk Sewer for District No. 14 which has already been accommodated, capacity will be required in the Main Street Relief Subtrunk and the South Irvine Lift Station and Relief Subtrunk, both of which are currently under design by Boyle Engineering Corporation. The actions appearing on your agenda are to authorize the Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle Engineering to make the necessary design revisions for said projects . Once amendments have been negotiated, the proposed addenda will be returned to the Board for approval. All additional engineering fees for the revisions will be reimbursed by IRWD. No. 9(q): Approve Addendum No. 3 to Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to Provide for Surveying Services for Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8 . At the . August meeting, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate an addendum to the contract with Boyle Engineering Corporation for surveying services for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer. These services are required to assure horizontal and vertical control of the facilities being constructed. The Selection Committee has negotiated an addendum with Boyle Engineering Corporation for construction surveying for a maximum fee not to exceed $41,064. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work, and adoption of a resolution approving the addendum for surveying services. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting documents. No. 9Cr): Referral of Summons and Cross-Complaint to General Counsel Re Alleged Damages to Versailles-on-the-Lake Property. Previously, clai ms h ave been filed on behalf of the owners of the Versailles-on-the-Lake apartment complex located at 3600 South Plaza Drive in Santa Ana, alleging that the District was responsible for sewer backups into their property. \ ~-- -8- . ' - 12/12/84 The District has now received a cross-complaint for the same incidents. The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive and file the document and refer it to the Districts' General Counsel and Liability Claims Administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Nos. 11 & 12: Report of the Executive Committee The Committee met on November 28th and enclosed for Board members is a written report of their discussions and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards. No. 13: Items Relative to Proposed Formation of District No. 14. At the November meeting the Joint Boards approved the conceptual agreement with the Irvine Ranch Water District CIRWD) and extended the date previously established by the Boards for execution of a final agreement by IRWD from December 1 to December 12, 1984. The District No. 7 Board also awarded Schedule A of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, which includes capacity for IRWD, subject to receipt of a written obligation from IRWD to pay $867,696, the incremental amount over bid schedules B which would have provided capacity for District No. 7 only, by November 21, 1984. The Board also directed the Deputy Chief Engineer and General Counsel to determine the feasibility of a change in the contract to delete IRWD's participation in the Von Karman reach of the project so that District No. 14/IRWD capacity in the sewer would only be .in the Main Street reach, as requested by IRWD, and t~ report back to the Board at the December meeting. The staff and General Counsel have been meeting with the representatives of IRWD in an attempt to work out the final language of the agreement for the proposed formation of Distri ct No. 14. Staff has also been meeting with the contractor for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer job to determine the feasibility of accommodating IRWD's request to eliminate their capacity in the Von Karman reach of that project. In the interim, a letter has been received from IRWD committing to pay the $867,696 incremental share of the contract to the District. A copy of the letter is enclosed with the agenda supporting documents. The Joint Chairman intends to call a meeting of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff sometime before the regular Joint Board meeting on December 12th to review the status of the proposed agreement. The Committee will present a verbal report and it 's recommendations to the Directors at the Joint Board t meeting. -9- ,.-- .,,. I' ( 1 No. 14: Actions Relative to Disposal of Pretreated Stringfellow Groundwaters. 12/12/84 At the November meeting the Boards approved the request of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority CSAWPA) to issue a permit to the State Department of Health Services (OOHS) to accept pretreated groundwater from the Stringfellow waste disposal site provided that the EPA/DOHS conduct a concurrent and full environmental review, and verification by the staff that the Districts ' NPDES permit would not be in jeopardy . The Boards' action also imposed conditions regarding testing of the wastewater and termination of the permi"t in the event of noncompliance with the Districts' and EPA's strict discharge standards. Enclosed with the agenda material is a statement submitted by Bettie Nosek which was received on November 21, 1984. Ms. Nosek had intended to present the statement to the Boards at the ' . -- November 14th meeting, however, she was unable to find the Districts ' o ff i ces that even i ng and has asked that her statement be entered i n to the record . Al s o enclosed wi th the agenda material is a c ommunication and r eso l ution from the Ci ty of Huntington Beach requesting that DOHS complete an environmental impact report prior to discharge of the pretreated groundwater. A verbal report of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority regarding status of compl i ance with the conditions established by the Boards wi l l be made at the Board meeting on December 12th . -10- December 4, 1984 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8 127 FOUNTA IN VALLE Y. CALI FORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS A V ENU E FOUNTA IN VALLEY. CALIF OR NIA 9 2 708-7018 (714) 540-2910 C7 14 l 9 62-2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE November 28, 1984 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE : Present: Richard B. Edgar, Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin, Vice Joint Chairman Henry Wedaa Evelyn Hart James Wahner Don Smith Ruth Bailey Supervisor Roger Stanton Absent: Convene: Adjourn : Robert Hanson Don Roth 5:30 p.m. 7:25 p.m. Others present : Director Oscar Brownell Director James Neal Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Richard Brownell, Malcolm-Pirnie Jeffrey Lauria, Malcolm-Pirnie Richard Pope, Malcolm-Pirnie Dave Harris, Malcolm-Pirnie Frank Dryden, Malcolm-Pirnie Staff present: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Blake P. Anderson, Director of Operations Tom Dawes, Deputy Chief Engineer William Clarke, Superintendent William H. Butler, Director of Finance Gary Streed, Chief Administrative Assistant 1) Report and Recommendations of Malcolm-Pirnie, Inc. re Odor Mitigation at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. In May, the Boards engaged the firm of Malcolm-Pirnie, Inc. to conduct an odor abatement study at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. Representatives of the consulting firm presented their findings and recommendations to the committee. A copy of the Odor Situation Assessment and Recommended Plan Executive Summary is enclosed . (Any Director wishing a copy of the full reports for Plant No . 1 and Plant No. 2, please call staff member Hilary Baker at 540-2910.) After a lengthy review of the consultants report, the Executive Committee recommends the following actions to the Boards of Directors. -1- Executive Committee Report November 28, 1984 (a) That the Odor Situation Assessment and Recommended Plan for Plants Nos. 1 and 2 be approved, but that the Plant No. 1 recommendations be modified to include full covers for the Plant No. 1 primary sedimentation basins, and that the Boards declare their intent to implement said recommendations, as modified, with respect to retrofitting of existing treatment works with odor control facilities. (b) That the Boards declare a policy of incorporating odor mitigation measures in future treatment works construction. (c) That staff be directed to prepare a detailed implementation plan and schedule including scopes of work for necessary engineering services to accomplish the adopted long-term odor mitigation recommendations. (d) That staff be authorized to direct K. P. Lindstrom, Inc., the consultant engaged to prepare the EIR for the Master Plan of Joint Works, to include the Malcolm-Pirnie recommendations in the EIR, as modified by the Directors. (e) That the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate with Malcolm-Pirnie for services to optimize efficiency of existing scrubbers and to prepare standard operating practices. Malcolm-Pirnie will review the report and recommendations at the Board meeting. 2) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation on Redevelopment Agency Policy. The Fiscal Policy Committee has been evaluating the impact of redevelopment agency project financing on the Districts. Use of tax increment financing to generate revenues for redevelopment projects, particularly those project areas which include major residential developments, freezes the individual Di strict's ad valorem tax revenues while the redevelopment activities within each project area generally result in additional flows to the District's sewerage facilities, thus increasing the cost of sewerage service. At the July Executive Committee meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee gave a status report. The Committee reviewed a report that had been requested of staff at considerable length and observed that the major impact is. on residential properties within the redevelopment projects. This is because the majority of projects are commercially or industrially oriented and these properties can be permitted and charged an annual user fee under the Districts' current Industrial Waste Ordinance. Following a review of the preliminary report, the Executive Committee authorized the Joint Chairman to write a letter to all Directors requesting that they take this matter up with their respective agencies and provide their input back to the Districts. The Joint Chairman was also authorized to send the letter to those other cities within the Districts' jurisdictional boundaries that are not members of the Joint Boards. -2- .,.~ Executive Committee Report November 28, 1984 The attached staff report, which was reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee at its October 31, 1984 meeting, summarizes the results of the responses from the agencies regarding the alternatives available to the Districts to address the impacts of redevelopment agency financing on the Districts (refer to Exhibit 1 of the staff report). From the member agency responses, there was no clear cut consensus regarding these .alternatives. Therefore the Fiscal Policy Committee submitted the following alternatives to the Executive Committee for consideration: A. That the Committee seek additional inputs from the agencies that have not responded to the letter in order to develop a broader consensus on the issue prior to the Fiscal Policy Committee making a formal recommendation to the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards. B. That a policy be adopted authorizing the staff to enter into direct negotiations with each city within the Districts' service area to effect a mutually agreeable resolution on either a city-wide or project-by-project basis and develop individual agreements to reflect either city-wide or project-specific cost impacts on the individual Districts. C. That a policy be adopted setting the following ranking of the alternatives for funding of Districts' services to redevelopment project areas, and that the staff be authorized to enter into negotiations with each agency using this priority ranking of the alternatives (outlined in detail in Exhibit 1 of the staff report) as a guideline in the negotiations: 1. Pass through of incremental tax revenues for all project areas 2. Issuance of industrial waste permits to all commercial and industrial users within each project area, and levy of a user fee on residences within each project area 3. Direct negotiations to discuss costs and select an appropriate alternative on a project-by-project basis. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommended that alternative recommendation C be presented to the Joint Boards for consideration. The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee recommendation. 3) Authorization to Exercise Option to Purchase Parkson/Wyss Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers and to Bid Installation at the Plant No. 1 Secondary Treatment Facilities. In February, the Boards authorized the purchase and installation of Parkson/Wyss Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers for installation on one of the ten secondary aeration basins at Treatment Plant No. 1 for evaluation of improved suspended solids (SS) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removal efficiencies. The contract included an option to purchase diffusers for the remaining nine sedimentation basins if the test proved successful. -3- Executive Committee Report November 28, 1984 Enclosed is a separate staff report on the evaluation of the Parkson/Wyss Medium Bubble Diffusers. Based on staff's analysis, retrofitting of the Plant No. 1 Secondary Aeration Basins would increase our overall efficiency by 25-30%. Installation of the medium bubble diffusers would enhance our treatment capability and reduce our operating costs. Staff estimates .that the $750,000 retrofitting cost would be paid back in approximately two years. The Executive Committee concurs with the staff recommendation to purchase and install Parkson/Wyss Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers for retrofitting the remaining nine Plant No. 1 Secondary Treatment Aeration Basins for imp r oved treatment and operational efficiency and that staff be authorized: (1) To exercise the option in the agreement with Parkson/Wyss and negotiate a purchase of diffusers, and associated piping and fittings, at an estimated cost of $451,000 for consideration by the Boards. (2) To solicit bids for the purchase of blower surge protection instrumentation at an estimated cost of $26,000 for consideration by the Boards. (3) To solicit bids for installation of diffusers and appurtenant equipment at an estimated cost of $253,000 for consideration by the Boards. All three contracts will be returned to the Boards for f i nal approval and award. 4) Recommendation for Phase 3 Physical/Chemical (Advanced Primary) Treatment . When application was made for the 30l(h) Waiver/NPDES Permit, it was anticipated that duri.ng the expected 5-year permit life the Districts would have to implement additional treatment measures, over and above what can be prov i ded by the activated sludge secondary treatment facilities at both Plants Nos. 1 and 2, in order to meet our permit limitations as flows increase. Accordingly, the Boards have previously approved Phase 1, a laboratory bench analysis and Phase 2, a pilot scale study of physical/chemical treatment by addition of chemicals to the primary sedimentation basins at Plant No. 2 to increase the settleability of suspended solids and BOD. It is much easier to handle the material as a primary sludge rather than as an activated sludge. Phases 1 and 2 have been completed and staff has determined that the addition of ferric chloride with a polymer appears to be a viable means of increasing the degree of treatment by removing suspended solids and BOD in the primary treatment process . Enclosed is a separate staff report recommending that we proceed with Phase 3, a full scale evaluation of the physical/chemical process using ferric chloride and polymer at Plant No. 2. Also enclosed i s a one page matrix summarizing the current use of various process chemicals by the Districts. -4- "r~ Executive Committee Report November 28, 1984 The Executive Committee recommends that staff be authorized to proceed with Phase 3 of a Physical/Chemical Study for a full-scale evaluation of the physical/chemical process using ferric chloride and polymer at Plant No. 2 for a total cost not to exceed $269,000; and that staff be authorized to purchase up to three different anionic polymers for evaluation in Phase .3 Physical/Chemica l Treatment Process study for an amount not to exceed $30,000 (included in above total of $269,000). 5) Authorization to Retrofit Rectangular Sedimentation Basin Chains, Sprockets and Appurtenances at Plant No. 2. In March, staff reported to the Boards that we had been experiencing failures of the cast iron chain and attachments used to pull the skimming blades in the secondary clarifiers at Plant No. 2. We have found that other large metropo l itan sewerage agencies with recently installed pure oxygen activated sludge treatment plants are experiencing similar failures. The Boards authorized retrofitting of one secondary sedimentation basin at the Plant No. 2 advanced treatment facilities with a plastic chain manufactured by the Budd Company that had proved successful when used under similar circumstances by other POTW's. The plastic chain and fittings are not subject to corrosive attack. Although several companies ma ke a similar plastic chain, the Budd material, using a combination of plastic, nylon and stainless steel, is the only product we have been able to identify with the strength necessary to withstand the stress placed on the system. The chain has now been installed in one of the secondary sedimentation basins and is performing well. Although it has not been in service for any length of t i me, based on the experience of other agencies, we antic i pate that it will perform sat i sf actori ly. We are continuing to experience failures of the cast iron chain in the secondary basins as well as a lower quality plastic chain in the three primary sedimentation basins at Plant No. 2. Staff is concerned that unless the situation is corrected as soon as possible, we will be unable to meet our 30l(h)/NPDES Permit requirements if several of the basins go down simultaneous l y because there is a considerable lead time required for acquisition of the repair chain. Enclosed is a separate comprehensive staff report on this matter. Staff i s requesting authority from the Board of Directors to negotiate with Gerlich-Mitchell, Inc . for purchase of the proprietary Budd chain system to retrofit the remain i ng eleven secondary clarifiers and the three primary clarifiers at Plant No. 2. Staff further recommends authorization for preparation of plans and specifications to solicit bids for removal of the existing deteriorated chain and installation of the replacement chain. Following is the estimated cost of the retrofitting: -5- Executive Committee Report November 28, 1984 Purchase Budd chain and appurtenant equipment Purchase three spare sets of Budd equipment, two secondary and one primary, to warehouse for future use . Sub-Total -Negotiated Chain Procurement Contract to remove existing flights and chains and prepare basins including cleaning each basin and installing new Budd system GRAND TOTAL: $1,190,000 255,000 $1,445,000 420,000 $1,865,000 The Executive Committee concurs with the staff recommendation . Both contracts will be submitted to the Boards for approval at a future meet i ng. 6) Continuation of Services of White, Fine and Verville to Provide Assistance re Legislation for Research Project for Deep Ocean Disposal of Sludge. The Boards have approved a research planning study with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for deep ocean disposal of sludge off Orange County and authorized the engagement of a Washington D. C. firm to assist the Districts in obtaining federal legislation to permit the construction and operation of the research project. The California Institute of Technology (Cal Tech) is conducting the research planning work while the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) is gathering data concerning the physical, chemical and biological conditions in the proposed discharge area. The Boards engaged the firm of White, Fine and Verville to provide the professional assistance to obtain the necessary legislation. Enclosed is a separate status report on efforts to obtain the necessary changes in federal legislation to allow the project to proceed. Every indication is that bills will be introduced early in the 1985 Congress to amend both the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Marine Protection Research and Sanctuary Act (MPRSA). Lobbying in favor of our proposal for the next six months will be critical in terms of obtaining language in the new legislation (either CWA or MPRSA) to permit the research project to go forward. The results of this research could mean millions of dollars of savings annually to coastal communities including our own agency. The Board's previous authorization for services of White , Fine and Verville in the amount of $100,000 expires in December . In order to assure the cont i nuation of the services of Lee White, our Counsel in Washington, D.C., toward favorable legislation when Congress convenes in January, it is recommended that the existing agreement for providing professional assistance and coordination of our efforts to obtain the necessary legislation be extended through June, 1985 at an added cost not to exceed $45,000 . -6- Executive Committee Report November 28, 1984 The following summarizes the anticipated costs of the preliminary research (gathering data concerning physical, chemical and biological conditions in the proposed discharge area) and legislative work previously approved by the Boards: Existing Agreements NOAA Cost $112 2300 Cal Tech $ 94,374 SCCWRP 288, 100 White, Fine & Verville 1002000 Total Dist Cost $4822474 Grand Total $5942 774 Continuation Pro~osal $ * * 452000 $ 452000 $ 452000 Total Stud,z: $112 2 300 $ 94,374 288,100 1452000 $5272474 $6392774 Districts Cost To Date $ 93,673 288, 100 962181 $4772954 *No adjustment is suggested at this time. Future requests for additional funds will be dependent on Congressional activity on this subject . The Executive Committee recommends that the services of White, Fine and Verville be extended through June, 1985, at an estimated cost not to exceed $45,000. 7) Board Room Smoking Polic,z:. At the November Joint Board Meeting, Director Cooper of Brea requested that the Boards establish a smoking policy for the Board Room and also asked that a policy for the staff areas be considered. Enclosed is a memorandum from Director Cooper regarding a smoking policy. The matter was referred to the Executive Committee by the Joint Chairman. Following a discussion on the subject, the Executive Committee directed the staff to designate the area in the back of the Board Room, immediately in front of the ventilation exhaust, as a smoking area and the balance of the Board Room as a non-smoking area. -7- . - October 23, 1984 Revised November 21, 1984 STAFF REPORT IMPACT OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FINANCING ON DISTRICTS BACKGRJUND At its July 16, 1984 meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee considered a report on the impact of redevelopment agency project financing on the Districts, and evaluated several alternatives available for addressing this issue. Use of tax increment financing to generate revenues for redevelopment projects, particularly those project a~eas which include major residential developments, freezes the individual Districts' ad valorem tax revenues while the redevelopment activities within each project area generaliy result in additional flows to Districts' sewerage facilities, thus increasing Districts• costs. The alternatives evaluated by the Fiscal Policy Committee to provide additional revenues from the redeveloped areas to meet increased operations and maintenance costs resulting from redevelopment activities included: -pass-through of incremental tax revenues collection of a user fee within a redevelopment project area via the County tax bill collection of a user fee by the redevelopment agency for remittance to the Districts -permitting and user fee collection from all improved commercial/industrial properties with each project area subsidization of the added cost of providing service to each project area for the life of the project subsidization of each project area until such time as an individual District must adopt District-wide user fees, at which time the fees would also be charged to all developed properties within the project area. Exhibit 1 defines these alternatives in greater detail. During the preceding two years, the staff had discussed the issue with several of the cities, including Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Huntington Beach, La Habra, Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana, Stanton and Westminster. During all of these discussions staff had sought to negotiate pass-through agreements for our share of the incremental tax revenues, as this approach appeared to be the most cost-effective for the Districts due to ease of administration and equity for all property owners within the Districts. It is also consistent with the guidelines in the Districts' ad valorem tax-based Revenue Program, which was adopted by the Boards in mid-1979 to comply with an EPA/SWRCB construction grant requirement. Tax pass-through agreements were negotiated with Placentia and Santa Ana. SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO JOINT CHAIRMAN'S LETTER TO CITIES Following a report regarding this issue made by the Fiscal Policy Committee at the July 25, 1984 Executive Conunittee meeting, the Executive Committee authorized Joint Chairman -1- '..._J The following table presents a swmnary of the formal and informal responses received to date regarding Joint Chairman Edgar's letter: Agency Anaheim Brea Buena Park Costa Mesa Costa Mesa Sanitary District Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Garden Grove (City) Garden Grove Sanitary District Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Midway City Sanitary District District (s) 2 & 3 2 & 3 3 1 & 6 1 & 6 3 2 & 3 2 & 3 2 & 3 2 & 3 3 & 11 7 2 & 3 3 3 3 Tax Pass-through Oser Fees Permits for C&I, user fee for residential Subsidies Oser fee already in existence Oser fee already .in existence Permits for C&I Some form of user fee -2- Other No response No response No response No response Discuss costs/ negotiate with District(s) No response Discuss costs/ negotiate with District(s) No response/no redevelopment agency No response Discuss costs/ negotiate with District 3 No response/no redevelopment agency No response Newport Beach ~ Orange County of Orange Placentia Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Tustin \._,I Villa Park Westminster Yorba Linda s, 6 & 7 2 & 7 1,2,3,5,6 7 & 11 2 1,2,3 & 7 3 3 2 3 2 Existing Agreement Existing Agreement with Districts 1, 2,3, & 7 Permits for C&I, user fee for residential No redevelopment agency Discuss costs/ negotiate with District(s) No response Discuss costs/ negotiate with District(s) No response No redevelopment agency No resi;>onse No response Exhibit 3 provides highlights of each city's response to the Joint Chairman's letter. ASSESSMENT OF RFSPONSES There is no clear-cut consensus. Five of the ten respondents propose direct discussions and negotiations with the Districts to determine the most appropriate and equitable approach to addressing this question on a proj_ect-by-project basis. The cities of Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Palma, Orange and Seal Beach, the respondents that favor direct negotiations with the Districts on a case-by-case basis, do not, however, appear to have a preference regarding the available alternatives presented in Joint Chairman Edgar's letter. Four cities favor some form of user fees and appear to be in agreement regarding issuance of permits to commercial and industrial users. The cities of Buena Park and Tustin endorse issuance of industrial waste permits to all commercial/industrial users, and a residential user fee within each applicable project area. Both Fountain Valley and Fullerton favor some.form of user fees, but have not specified their preferences regarding residential users, although Fountain Valley has no residential development in '--" its two existing project areas. A supplemental user fee already exists in the Costa Mesa Sanitary District service area, and thus the shortfalls caused by redevelopment activities in their service area are covered by user fee revenues. -3- While the City of Santa and the City of Placentia have already entered into agreements to provide for pass-through of each District's share of the incremental tax revenues allocated to their redevelopment agencies, none of the other respondents appear to favor ~ this approach, and t;he cities of Huntington Beach and Seal Beach specifically oppose this concept. -4- ALTERNATIVES FOR FUNDING OF DISTRICT SERVICES TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS EXHIBIT 1 8/01/84 1. Incremental Tax Pass-Through -Seek a pass-through of incremental tax revenues that accrue to the Redevelopment Agency to cover the Districts' added costs. Our historical share of the ad valorem tax is approximately 3% of the 1% basic levy. This alternative provides for the Agency to "pass-through" to the Districts their historical share (3%) of the incremental tax accruing to the Agency. 2a. User Fee Collected by District on Tax Bill -Establish a zone for the redevelopment agency and levy a use fee to be collected on the property tax bill. 2b. User Fee Collected by Redevelopment Agency -An alternative to 2a. would be for the redevelopment agency to collect a use fee, on behalf of the Districts, and remit the amount to the Districts, keeping 5% to cover their administrative costs. This method would be similar to the existing agreements providing for the cities to collect the Districts• connection fees. 2c. Commercial/Industrial User Fee Combined with Another Alternative for Residential -For commercial/industrial properties, the Districts could issue a permit under the provisions of the current uniform industrial waste ordinance and levy and collect user fees from those properties · where the yearly cost of services provided exceed the annual property tax paid to the Districts. Since the majority of redevelopment projects are commercial/industrial, this option could be utilized for those properties in combination with one of the five other alternatives for residential properties. 3a. Project Life Subsidy -Subsidize the added cost of providing service for the redevelopment areas with the District-wide share of the ad valorem tax currently apportioned under Proposition 13. 3b. Interim Subsidy -As in 3a., subsidize the added cost of providing service for the redevelopment areas with the District-wide share of the ad valorem tax currently apportioned under Proposition 13 only until such time as it is necessary to adopt District-wide user fees. At such time, the adopted fee would also apply to redevelopment properties. MN-5 It should be noted that the options listed above under alternative 3 may be in conflict with the Revenue Program adopted by the Boards in compliance with state and federal regulations that provide.that all users pay their proportionate share of Districts' costs. EXHIBIT 2 August 1, 1984 Director --------------------- Subject: Impact of Redevelopment Agency Financing on County sanitation . Districts Dear : Redevelopment law in the State of California has provided mechanics in recent years to significantly upgrade the infrastructures in many communities. Cities in Orange County have used this vehicle effectively, as evidenced by the fact that over 18,000 acres are now within redevelopment agencies. The principal which bas been used in the majority of the cities in Orange County bas been to utilize the redevelopment funding as a means to enhance revenue streams within the area. Although there are mandates as far as housing developments are concerned, the main thrust has been the improvement of commercial or industrial property since this provides a much more attractive revenue stream. This principal is quite obvious when an analyses of each redevelopment agency project is made. Regardless of the development that was made in each area, .such development results in the discharge of waste material to the Sanitation Districts which must be processed and disposed of to conform to all the strict requirements of the EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. The problem faced by the Sanitation Districts is that because of the redevelopment agency tax increment financing, the Districts annual cost of services may not be covered by the Districts• frozen share of the ad valorem taxes. It should be noted that capital facilities improvements is not at issue. Each development is obliged to pay connection fees for sewer capacity expansion and these fees continue to be adequate. The problem is the annual cost of operations and maintenance. The basic question that must be answered by all of us then is, •sow should these treatment costs be paid?• An option that is available is to permit a tax pass-through by the redevelopment agency so that the incremental tax will automaticalry be forwarded to the District for payment of their escalating operating expenses. However,· many of us who sit as Directors of redevelopment agencies are quite reluctant to do this because it may dilute the effectiveness of the agency in achieving its stated purpose. Director --~~~~~~~ Page Two August 1, 1984 As I have studied the issue, it seems to me that as far as commerciar and industrial development is concerned, the user fee will be levied automatically by the Districts pursuant to the existing industrial use ordinance. As we gain a more complete identification of high revel users the industrial and commercial developments will pay their fair share. Since these fees are reduced by the equivalent ad valorem tax which has been paid by the property owner, the tax credit will simply be a little bit less because of the redevelopment agency. This leads to the observation that the real issue is residential· development. Significant development of this nature increases waste flew that must be processed by the Districts but does not increase taxes paid to the Districts to cover costs. In these instances, it might be practical to levy a user fee to cover costs. Many Districts already have such a fee and the mechanics of collecting it are already In prace. Our Boards have under consideration several options, a swmnary of which is attached. However, in order to treat this problem in an equitable fashion, it is important to first determine the nature of the development in all of the affected agencies which necessitates a response from your redeveropment agency. In this response, a detaired swmnary identifying the separation of projects between residential and conunercial/industria1·, as welr as the impact of the various options, would be quite valuable. This would enable identification of the magnitude of the problem much better than could be done by our Sanitation Districts' staff. I would appreciate it if you would respond to this problem. The Boards' Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to consider this matter at its September meeting and, so, it would be most helpful if I could hear from you by September 1st. Any suggestions of other systems to achieve equitable payment of fees without creating a new bureaucracy would certainly be appreciated also. RBE:dl Enclosure Sincerely, Richard B. Edgar Joint Chairman o A EXHIBIT 3 Highlights of Resp()nses to Joint Chairman's Letter Re Impact of Redevelopment Agency Financing on the Districts Listed below is a city-by-city breakdown of responses received regarding the Joint Chairman's letter requesting connnents on the fiscal impact of redevelopment on the Districts. Buena Park The City of Buena Park advises that the pass-through of incremental tax revenues generated within redevelopment project areas is the least desirable method for addressing the impact of redevelopment on the Districts. The City strongly endorses the existing approach of permitting commercial and industrial users, and feels that this approach could be extended into redevelopment project areas if necessary to help the District's financial position. The City also supports the concept of establishing a residentiar user fee within each applicable project area if necessary. Costa Mesa Sanitary District The Costa Mesa Sanitary District and District No. 6 instituted supplemental user fees effective July 1, 1983. These user fees generate revenues necessary and sufficient to fully cover the Districts' operations and maintenance expenditures formerly funded by ad valorem tax revenues, and also cover any tax revenue losses incurred through use of tax increment financing in the District 6 service area. Fountain vailey Fountain Valley presently has two redevelopment project areas, of which one is 100% commercial and the other is 100% industrial. The City has not taken a position on residential development within redevelopment project areas since there is no residential development in its two existing project areas. Informal communications with the City planning staff indicate support for issuance of industrial waste permits to the commercial and industrial users within the pro- ject areas. Fullerton The City of Fullerton supports some form of user fee concept for collection of Districts• incremental revenues within redevelopment project areas. Al1 three of the City's existing project areas include commercial development, and implementation of a user fee program administered by the Districts within these project areas is acceptable to the City. Hunti~gton Beach ·~ Huntington Beach opposes the concept of providing incremental tax pass-through based upon the historical share that goes to the Districts. Many times the Redevelopment Agency will not immediately know the specific development that is -1- . . going to be built within the redevelopment project area, and would not be in a position to blindly.agree to the pass-through concept. However, if the Districts can show the Redevelopment Agency specifically what impact a proposed project will have on our operating and maintenance costs, the Redevelopment Agency appears willing to review those additional costs that are identified by the District and to discuss it with the Districts. La Palma The City of La Palma prefers direct negotiations with District No. 3 to discuss the cost impact of its redevelopment project on the District and identify a cost-effective solution to this issue. NewPC?rt Beach The Joint Chairman's letter does not apply to the City of Newport Beach or District 5 because the city presently has no redevelopment project areas. They did, however, indicate that when a redevelopment agency is formed, the cost of future services (including sewer service) should be taken into account. Unless the remaining property owners are willing to sha~e in the added cost, the redevelopment agency should not be formed. Orang~ The City of Orange views redevelopment as a viable financing mechanism only if it is beneficial to taxing agencies, including the Sanitation Districts. The primary thrust of both of the city's existing projects has been to attract major retail stores. Director Smith, who authored the city's response, feels that such developments will have little, if any, impact on taxing agencies such as the Districts, ·but will ultimately end up on the tax rolls to support the needs of all taxing agencies. Should it be determined, however, that these or future proj.ects have a financial impact on the Sanitation Districts, the City's policy is to meet and discuss approaches whereby the project could be amended so that all taxing agencies will ultimately benefit from the projects. Placentia Placentia's existing redevelopment project area is composed entirely of commercial and industrial properties. No property was rezoned in the process of adopting their plan last year. Therefore, Placentia feels that their project should have no short-term or long-term impact on residential development within the County of Orange. · The Board of Directors of the Placentia Redevelopment Agency have already agreed to pass-through the amount of tax increment funds that would normally be received by the District, and this policy should remain in effect throughout the duration of the redevelopment plan. In adopting this policy, the Board acknowledged the financial needs of the Districts, and agreed to cooperate with the pass-through request. Seal Beach The city indicated that while -incremental tax pass-throughs appeared viable and simple to administer, they pose several drawbacks to the City. First, from the redevelopment agency's perspective, such an action would set a precedent, and could open the door for other taxing districts to follow suit and demand their -2- fair or historical share. Second, such pass-through agreements should result from the fiscal review process, which occurs only when a new project area is amended. Therefore, the City Manager feels that a pass-through does not address development that is to occur in an existing project area, which should be an iJ1DDediate concern to the Districts. He indicated that the remaining five alternatives require some type of enabling legislation, either at a local government or higher level, which would be equally difficult to achieve. This leads to another alternative, which may be more palatable in that it does not target redevelopment agencies but does address all major new development. More and more cities are requiring developers to absorb such costs as street and landscaping through development agreements, specific plan approvals, etc. Seal Beach believes that through a negotiation process, we could prevail upon cities and/or redevelopment agencies to recoup our increased operations and maintenance costs when such agreements are struck. This may be another viable alternative to consider. Tustin The City of Tustin supports issuance of industrial waste permits to all commercial and industrial users within each project area to ensure the Districts collect the revenues necessary to meet its operations and maintenance requirements for service to the project area. If the project contains significant residential improvements, the city endorses the concept of implementing residential user fees within redevelopment project areas containing major residential developments. Consideration should also be given to using '...,_) part of the 20% now required to support housing to pay the residential user fees. Villa Park The City of Villa Park informally advised that it presently has no redevelopment agency. -3- November 20, 1984 PURPOSE STAFF REPORT AERATION EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT TRIAL AND REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE MEDIUM BUBBLE DIFFUSERS The purpose of this report is to present the results of a full-scale trial for improving the aeration efficiency at Plant No. 1 and to request authority to purchase and install medium bubble diffusers for the entire Plant No. I.aeration basins. BACKGROUND The Plant No. 1 Secondary Treatment plant (completed in 1978) was constructed with coarse bubble air diffusers in the aeration basins. The diffusers are used for injecting air in the secondary treatment process to provide oxygen to the microorganisms that assimilate pollutants in the wastewater. The inability of the coarse bubble diffusers to efficiently tran~fer oxygen to the microorganisms causes us to operate more blowers than we would have to otherwise. The plant has two 1500 horsepower digester gas fueled engine driven blowers and two 1500 horsepower electric driven blowers. Operation of the plant at design flows of 46 MGD presently requires the operation of two blowers. The Districts have been historically able to operate at less than design flows to reduce electric costs associated with running the second blower while still achieving our discharge limitations. However, operation at flows of 46 ·MGD (and higher) is becoming necessary as Districts influent flow increases and the more restrictive discharge limitations of our 30l(h) modified NPDES permit come into effect. In 1983 staff surveyed other operating agencies in an effort to find a more energy efficient air diffuser. Staff selected a medium bubble diffuser for trial. In February of this year, the Board approved purchase of Parkson/Wyss Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers for installation and testing in one of the ten· aeration basins at Plant No. 1, with an option to purchase diffusers for.the remaining nine basins at the same price up to March 31, 1985. The new diffusers were installed and placed in service in July, 1984. The manufacturer guaranteed a 25% increase in air diffuser transfer efficiency. EVALUATION PROCEDURES The medium bubble diffusers were evaluated by comparing the treatment results of two aeration basins operating in parallel. One contained the original coarse bubble diffusers and the other contained the medium bubble diffusers. During the testing period the air flow to the medium bubble diffusers was reduced in step- wise increments. The coarse bubble system (existing) was held at air rates that have been used with success while operating the existing process. The rate that has been historically successful with the coarse bubble diffusers has been 1300 cubic feet of air per pound of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removed. The air in the trial basin ·was lowered to 900 cubic feet of air per· pound of BOD removed. Process stability and performance with the medium bubble diffusers at the reduced air flow was slightly better than the control basins·. This repre- sented· a 30% reduction in required air. -~ ANALYSIS OF RESULTS The air and energy requirements using the present coarse bubble diffusers and the Parkson/Wyss medium bubble air diffusers are summarized in Table No. 1. The air and energy requirements are shown for present treatment flow rates of 40 MGD for which one blower is presently used, the design flow rate of 46 MGD and two future flow rates of 50 and 55 MGD. Installation of the mediom bubble air dif- fusers will allow one digester gas driven blower to provide enough air to treat up to 55 MGD secondary treatment in the present aeration system. Energy savings of 600 to 800 horsepower are.projected. The electrical and energy savings are summarized in Table 2. The annual dollar savings using the medium bubble air diffusers increase as the flow increases. At design flow for the plant of 46 MGD the annual savings is $474,000/year. The diffusers will cost $750,000 to install. Costs are summarized in Table No. 3. At this installation cost the payback is less than two years. The Wyss/Parkson diffusers on an annualized capital and operation cost will save $376,000. The comparis~n is summarized in Table 4. CONCLUSION Installation of the medium_ bubble diffuser system will increase the secondary treatment capability of the digester gas fueled 1500 horsepower blower equipment at the Plant No. 1 Secondary Treatment Plant by 25% to 30%, which is equivalent to 10 MGD. This will increase the overall BOD and suspended solids removal capabilities of the existing facilities and help improve the Districts' ability to meet our pending 301(h) modified NPDES permit limitations. Installation of the medium bubble diffusers will allow more secondary treatment to be accomplished while using the present digester gas fueled blower equipment. The installa.tion of the diffusers will allow the blower to do more work with the same installed horsepower. One present digester gas fueled blower would be able to provide air for an additional 10 MGD of secondary treatment. Increased treatment presently is provided by running costly electric driven blower equip- ment in addition to the digester gas fueled blowers. Additional secondary treatment is needed as District influent flows increase to meet· the 30l(h)/NPDES permit limits. The costs saved will pay for the estimated $750,000 installed· cost of the diffusers in approximately two years. REQUESTED ACTION Staff requests authority to exercise the option in the existing agreement with Parkson/Wyss and to purchase up to 11700 Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers for a price not to exceed $31.50 per diffuser plus tax plus associated piping and fittings (estimated total.material cost $451,000) to outfit the remaining nine aeration basins at. Plant No. 1. Staff also requests authority to solicit bids for the .purchase of blower surge protection instrumentation (estimated to cost $26,000), and authority to solicit bids for the installation of the diffusers (estimated to cost $253,000). All 3 contracts will be returned to the Boards for final approval and award. ( ( ( TABLE PLANT NO. 1 ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT AVERAGE ANNUAL OPERATING CRfTERIA FLOW AVERAGE (1) AIR REQUIREMENTS (2) ENERGY REQUIREMENTS (3) ENERGY (5): (MGD) BOD DIFFERENCE (HP) REMOVED COURSE BUBBLE MED WM BUBBLE COURSE BUBBLE' ( 4) MEDIUM BUBB~E (4) (POUNDS/DAY) (CFM) (CFM) (HP)/NO. BLOWERS (HP)/NO. BLOWERS 40 . 48,400 43,700 31,930 1500/1 1220/1 280 46 55,630 50,200 36,700 2080/2 1275/1 805 (Design Flow) 50 60,465 54,600 .. 39,900 2140/2 1480/1 660 55 66,510 60,050 43,900 2220/2 · 1580/1 640 (1) 155 mg/1 average monthly BOD i.n primary effluent for Fiscal 83/84. Assumes 10 mg/1 in effluent or 145 mg/1 reduction. - - (2) Course Bubble -1,300 cf/lbs BOD removed historical CSDOC operating experience (minimum for good preformance). Medium Bubble -950 cf/lbs BOD removed -75% ! of Course Bubble. (3). Calculated from blower curves at brake horsepower requirements assuming engine driven blower can be throttled and average ambient inlet conditions. (4) When one blower is required, an engine driven blower will be utilized. When two blowers are required, an electric and ·engine driven ~lowers are assumed to operate at equal loading .. (5) Higher numbers for 46 through 55 MGD depict the efficiency reduction due to operation of two blowers for course bubble diffusers versus one blower for medium bubble diffusers. t-., .. ~ "'......- ,. ( ( ( TABLE 2 AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPARISON OPERATING CO~TS OF DIFFUSER ALTERNATIVES COURSE BUBBLE MEDIUM BUBBLE FLOW DIGESTER (1) FUEL 0 IL (2) ELECTRICAL (3) TOTAL. DIGESTER FUEL OIL ELECTRICAL TOTAL (MGD) GAS GAS (1) (2) (3) 40 (1410 HP) (90 HP) (1147 HP) (73 HP) $741,000 $42,800 --. $783 ,800 $603,000 $34,900 --$637,900 46 (978 HP) (62 HP) (1040 HP) (1198 HP) (77 HP) $514,000 $29,700 $598,000 $1,141~700 $631,000 $36,400 --$667,400 50 (1006 HP) (64 HP) (1070 HP) (1391 HP) (89 HP) $529,000 $30,600 $615,000 $1,174,600 $731,000 $42,300 --$773,300 55 (1043 HP) (67 HP) (1110 HP) (1485 HP) (95 HP) $548,000 $31,700 $638,000 $1,217,700 $780,500 $45, 100 --$825,600 (1) Digester gas costs estimated at parity with natural gas at $.75 per therm for comparison purposes only. Actual costs for digester gas is difficult to assess. Conversion to therms at 8,000 BTU/BRAKE HP. (2) Fuel oil costs estimated at 6% of engine BTU/BRAKE HP requirements or 500 BTU/HP. Current cost· at $1.00 per gallon, 144,159 BTU per gallon. (3) Based on current electrical energy costs at $0.08 per K\:IH and .82 KW per HP. ~I::, ; TABLE 3 . CAPITAL COSTS OF MEDIUM BUBBLE DIFFUSERS REMAINING 9 BASINS Diffusers and Fittings Blower Surge Protection Equipment Labor and Benefits for Installation Contingencies $451,000.00 26,000.00 253,000.00 20,000.00 $750,000.00 ' TABLE 4 ANNUAL COST COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE AERATION EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 BASED ON OPERATION AT 46 MGD ITEM Estimated Construction Costs Amortized Annual Capital Costs (1) Comparitive Annual Operation (2) Total Comparitive Annual Cost at 46 MGD Operation COARSE BUBBLE $1,142,000.00 $1, 142,0.~0.00 MEDIUM BUBBLE $750,000.00 99,000.00 667,000.00 $766,000.00 Difference $376,000.00/year (1) Amortized cost at 12 percent interest for 20 years. This is same assumption as the comparison in 83 master plan. (2) Fro~ previous itemized table at 46 MGD operation.· -.··~. October 30, 1984 PURPOSE STAFF REPORT PHYSICAL CHEMICAL STUDY The purpose of this Staff Report is to provide an update on the Plant No. 2 physical/chemical study and to request authority to do full scale trialing of chemical addition for improved (advanced primary) treatment in the Plant No. 2 primary clarifiers . BACKGROUND Additional treatment will be required as future flows increase and/or seasonal h i gh loadings are experienced in order to allow the Districts to achieve the tentat i vely approved 30l(h) NPDES waiver permit limitations. This treatment need is beyond the recently completed 75 MGD of secondary treatment at Plant No. 2 and the existing 60 MGD of secondary treatment at Plant No. 1. The physical/chemical study is evaluating ways to enhance settling of suspended solids and BOD by chemical addition in the Plant No. 2 primary clarifiers. The investigation has been divided into three phases. The first two phases are complete. The three phases are summarized as follows: Phase 1 -After an extensive literature search of advanced primary treatment with chemical coagulants and flocculants, a laboratory bench study (Phase I) wa~ conducted to select the most cost effective combination of chemicals, for the study. Results from the study indicated that chemical addition to raw sewage does enhance settling of suspended solids and BOD. Phase 2 -In July 1983, the Districts Executive Committee recommended and the Boards approved the Phase 2 evaluation in an amount not to exceed $15,000. Also approved at the same time was rehabilitation of existing Plant No. 2 facilities in preparation of Phase 3 work in an amount not to exceed $40,000. The purpose of Phase 2 was to study chemical addition on a pilot scale to evaluate the effectiveness of various combinations of chemi- cals on primary effluent quality and on primary digestion in pilot units. The study indicated that both ferric chloride with polymer and aluminum sulfate with polymer enhanced suspended solids and BOD settling. Phase 3 -Phase 3 is proposed to be a four (4) month evaluation of ferric chloride and polymer addition to approximately 1/3 of the Plant No. 2 influent flow. Ferric chloride/polymer was selected over aluminum sulfate/polymer because it would provide the added benefit of odor mitigation and removal of sulfur from the digester gas. Phase 3 was originally intended to evaluate the physical chemical process on a full scale basis utilizing a single clarifier. Staff recommends expanding the scope to an evaluation-of five clarifiers. There are two advantages of expanding the scope and beginning the trial as soon as possible: (1) To treat seasonal high BOD. During the winter months influent wastewater contains high BOD levels from the food processing industry. The expended scope of the trial for physical/chemical treatment (Phase 3) will provide additional ability to remove those constituents on an interim basis while the Industrial Waste Division formulates BOD and TSS limitations for industrial dischargers. (2) To demonstrate a full scale process to establish costs for com- parison with other improved treatment alternatives. The total cost for Phase 3 is estimated to be $269,000 as follows: Ferric chloride Polymer Subtotal, chemicals Operations/Lab Staff Contingency $125,000 30,000 $155,000 62,000 52,000 $269,000 (Note: In addition to the above $40,000 for rehabilitation of existing Plant No. 2 facilities was authorized in July, 1983 by the Boards in preparation for Phase 3.) Ferric chloride would be purchased under the ferric chloride purchase contract approved by the Board at the November 14th meeting. Part of the Phase 3 work will include evaluating the effectiveness of one to three polymers and developing a method of competitively bidding for polymer in the event of a decision to continue physical/ chemical treatment permanently. For this study, polymer purchases would be negotiated with those suppliers whose product is determined to be most effective as determined by trialing. REQUESTED ACTION Staff requests authority to proceed with the Phase 3 study to evaluate the addi- tion of chemicals to Plant No. 2 clarifiers for improved treatment and -..... ,. ... _ authorizing staff to purchase up to three anionic polymers for an amount not to exceed $30,000 for trialing, for a total estimated Phase 3 study cost of $269,000. ( ( Novembe1 l 9, 1984 Co un ty Sanitation Districts f Oranae Count y CURRENT SP ECIAL EVALU AT ION PROJECTS · COS! USE ffi llUU 11 IUN W!:>I USE OR llDD ll I UN I CHEMICAL ($/YR) PO I NT EF FECT $ PER TRIA L PO I NT EFF ECT Chlorine $900,000 PLT 1&2 INFLUENT Sulfide odor remo val. C-015 <BULK) PLT 2 RAS Improve activated sl udge C-016 (l TONl settleabi I ity . PL T 2 FOUL A IR SCRUBBERS Su lf i de an d organi c odor removal. PLT 1&2 INFLUENT BACKUP Su l fide odor remova l . I FOR BULK PLT 1&2 PRIMARY BAS I N Sulfide odor removal . SPRAYS PLT 1 RAS Improve activated sludg settl e8bi I ity . PLT 1&2 PLANT WATER Pathogen destruction. Ferr i c Ch l oride $205,000 PLT 2 INFLUENT SUPPLE -Sulfide odor removal . $125 ,000 4 MONTH TR IAL IN 1/3 OF Coagulant for TSS and BOD remo v- IJENT & BACKUP Fffi BULK PLT 2 PRIMARY CLAR I FIERS al. (Physica l /Chemica l Phase 3 P-067 CHLORINE Ad va nced Pr imary Treatment) Ferrous Ch l oride s 20,000 3 M()ITH TR IAL IN DIG. A Hydrogen su l fide removal from AT PLT 2 digester gas to meet AQMD Rule P-070 43 1.1 rea u ireme nts. Hydrogen Peroxide $350,000 PLT 1&2 DI GESTED SLUDGE Confined space emp l oyee safety P-068 PR IOR TO DEWATERING and odor control . Potassium Perma n-s 35,000 PLT 1&2 BACKuP CHEM ICAL Confined space employee safety aa nate P-069 FOR HYDROGEN PEROXIDE and odor contro l. Sodi um Hydroxide S200,000 PLT 2 FOUL AIR SCRUBBERS Sulfi de odor removal. s 3,000 KOMAX SCRUBBER PROCESS Hydrogen sulfide remova l f rom (Caustic Soda) digester gas to meet AQMD Rule P-062 PW-126 431 .1 requirements . Polymer 1,1 00,000 DEWATERED SLUDGE CHEM ICAL Digested s l udge coagulation for s 20 ,000 SLUDGE DEWATER ING Testi ng for 1985 b i dd i ng. I CONDIT ION I NG dewater i ng. (Cationic Polymer) P-069 P-060 s 30,000 4 MONTH TR I AL I N 1/3 OF Coagulant for TSS and BOD remov - PLT 2 PRIMARY CLAR I FIERS al. (Physica l /Chemical Phase 3 Advanced Primary Treatment>. (Anionic Po l ymer) I s 5,000 PLT 2 OAF Sludge thickening . (Cation ic Polymer) TOTALS $2,790,000 $183,000 ========== ===== - - November 18, 1984- STAFF REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Q RANGE C OUNTY , CALI FOR NIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLI S AVENUE FOUNTAI N VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92 708 (714) 540.2910 (714)962-24 11 Replacement of Chain Drives at Plant No. 2 BACKGROUND As part of the construction of the secondary facilities at Plant No. 2, the Districts installed replacement chain drives on existing primary clarifiers A, B and C and new chain drives on secondary clarifiers A through L. On both the primary and secondary clarifiers, the chains drive the rotating flights which collect scum on the top and sludge on the bottom. On the primary clarifiers plastic chains were used while on the secondary clarifiers steel chains were used. The Districts have experienced considerable pro bl ems with each of these systems, the correction of which is the subject of this report. PRIMARY CLARIFIERS A, B AND C The three primary clarifiers were installed as the first construction on the Huntington Beach plant in 1954. They are the only rectangular primary clarifiers operated by the Districts and the rehabilitation of these clarifiers was included as part of the secondary facilities contract in the early 1980's. As such, it was eligible for grant funding. The basins, approximately 170 feet long, include cross-collectors at each end. The contractor for the work used FMC Link-Belt non-metallic chain . The chain has suffered numerous failures, particularly in the period since the warranty expired, resulting in excessive maintenance costs and down time of the primary facilities. The District desired to try a plastic chain when the redesign and rehabilitation of the clarifiers was in progress because of some inherent benefits plastic offers over steel. The most obvious of these is the reduced corrosion potential. In addition, the chains are much lighter, thus easier to service. Reduced wear on the guides, tracks, sprockets and the chains and reduced power consumption and maintenance were anticipated because of less weight and the resulting lower stresses. Under EPA procurement regulations, the specifications were required to be sufficiently general to encourage greater bid participation in product procurement. Accordingly, the FMC Link-Belt chain met the specifications and in fact, based on review of FMC' s long history of other product supplies and the detailed information on the chain, it appeared that this chain would more than adequately meet the Districts' needs. Unfortunately , the performance of the chain has not met the Districts' e xpectations. FMC has tried several fixes so that the chains would not break as often as they do, all to no avail. The Company and the staff cannot fully explain or find specific reasons for the c ontinued failures. It appears to the staff that the chains and appurtenances are just not strong enough for the application . It should be noted that while there were obvious reasons to use plastic chain, at the tim e of design and installation, it was a relatively new product with a limited performance record. -...... - Replacement of Chain Drives at Plant No. 2 Page 2 "Jovem ber 18, 19&4 SECONDARY CLARIFIERS A-L The major advanced treatment facilities included twelve ( 12) secondary clarifiers. Each clarifier includes an approximately 150 foot lonJ:?; longitudinal collector and a 50 foot long cross collector . The specifications required and the District received an alloy steel chain, in this case, manufactured by Hitachi Metals Limited. Metal collector chains have been used for over 50 years in sewage treatment works; however, problems have been encountered in some recent installations when metal chains are used in secondary clarifiers following the relatively new pure oxygen activated sludge facilities. The nistricts problem, similar to that on other plants, is that the metal chains are suffering high corrosion rates while in service. The accelerated electrochemical corrosion of the chain appears to be caused by the high levels of dissolved oxygen present in the secondary treated effluent. The staff has investigated the problem and discussed it with other agencies and it appears t hat the only solution is the replacement of the metallic chains with a non- metallic chain. The damage to this chain has occured at such a rapid rate that it is doubtful that the chains will last another six months. The chain in clarifier L (the most easterly clarifier of the twe Ive) has been replaced, on a trial basis, with a non- metallic chain supplied by the Budd Company, explained below. It should be noted that we must keep the facilities in operation in order to meet t he NPnES dischaq~e permit requirements. Excessive down time of the clarifiers, which is certain to come, may limit our ability to meet discharge permit requirements. ALTERNATIVES The staff has investigated the options available to correct both the primary and secondary chain problems. These available alternatives are: ( 1) Continue to fix breaks in existing chains as they occur. (2) Replace the failed plastic and metal chains in kind. (3) Replace the primary basins plastic chains with a more sturdy metal chain. (4) Replace both primary and secondary metal chains with a better plastic chain. Clearly, the first option is not satisfactory since the down time greatly affects the Districts ability to comply with its NPDES permit. The second option, replacing metal chains in the secondary clarifiers, is equally poor since it appears that any known alloy configuration may be subject to the electrochemical problems discussed above. The third solution is to replace the failing primarv plastic chains with new plastic chains or new metal chains . There are several plastic chain manufacturers which coul d supply the chains; however, all except one appear to be equivalent in quality to the plasti c chains supplied for the primary clarifiers under t he original grant-approved -..... Replacement of Chain T)rives at Plant No. 2 Page 3 November 18, 1984 specifications. For the same reasons that the decision was made in 1979 to switch from metal to plastic chains (i.e. reduced wear, friction, and dr ive costs), the staff prefers to stay with non-metallic chains. 1· The fourth option, replacing both primary and secondary clarifier chains with new plastic chains, is the only option available for the secondary clarifiers and the preferred option for the primary clarifiers. A very similar situation has occurred in the nade County Water Sewage Authority located in Miami, Florida. This facility operates fourteen ( 14) clarifiers following a pure oxygen activated sludge plant. In the short time since this facility has been operational ( 1980), the metal parts in the rectangular clarifiers have been severely corroded and de~raded by electrolysis. Dade County staff investigated metal and plastic chains and determined that the Budd Company chain was the only plastic chain that would provide the necessary reliability. [)ade County has proceeded with a complete retrofitting with the Piudd chains. In \iarch of 1984 the Directors approved the installation of a similar Budd system in clarifier L. This facility was placed into operation October 1, 1984 (a long lead time is required for the chain manufacturer) and it has been performing satisfactorily. It will be closely monitored in the next several months. Similar Budd systems have been installed at several locations in the last four years in California including the Castaic plant in Santa Barbara County, the Simi Valley San i tation District plant, the Los Angeles C ounty Sanitation mstrict's San Jose plant, Lake Casitas Water Plant, City of Los Angeles Terminal Island plant, Encinas Joint Powers Authority and the City of Avalon's Catalina plant. In all of these facilities it appears the Budd chain was selected over conventional plastic chain as well as steel chain through an evaluation process with direct purchase or bidding allowing only the Budd chain system. A staff summary dated October 24, 1984 listing the contacts made by the staff in this investigation is attached. RECOMMENnATION Staff believes that the primary and secondary basins at Plant No. 2 should be retrofitted with the Budd plastic chain and compatible components. There are two methods available to accomplish this task: 1) To bid the purchase and installation of the chain with specifications which would allow only Budd products; or 2) To direct purchase the Budd system from the manufacturer's representative and separately bid the installation. In review of bids and discussions with other agencies, it is believed that the most cost-effective way would be for the T)istricts to negotiate directly with the Budd Chain representative, Gierlich-Mitchell Company, to provide the materials for the collector chains, new fiber g lass fli ghts, flight collectors and cross collectors for each of the remaining eleven (11) secondary clarifiers and the three (3) primary clarifiers (total: 14 clarifiers), plus spare equipment. It is believed that a single source bid for the Replacement of Chain brives at Plant No. 2 Pa~e 4 November 18, 1984 • chain procurement and installation would raise the price because of the contractor's markup and the supplier's higher risk of not receiving prornot payment. Removal of existing chains and installation can therefore be bid under normal procedures. It is anticipated that the costs will be as follows: A.1 Purchase Budd equipment for each clarifier at an estimated materials cost of $85, 000 per clarifier including tax and freight: 14 basins fO $85, 000 each = A. 2 Purchase three spare sets of Budd equipment, two secondary and one primary, at an estimated material cost of S85, 000 each including tax and freight: 3 x $85,000 = Subtotal -Negotiated Chain Procurement B .1 Remove existing flights and chains and preparation of basins including cleaning each basin and install- ing plastic guides on the bottom track guide: 14 basins fO $15, 000 each = B. 2 Insta 11 new Budd system: 14 basins (cl $15, 000 each = $ 1, 190 '000 255,000 $ 1,445,000 210,000 210,000 Subtotal -Bid Installation $ 420,000 Grand Total: $ 1,865,000 Staff requests authority from the Board of Directors to negotiate with Gierlich-Mitchell Inc. for purchase of the Budd Chain system. A fixed price per basin contract would be most desirable with a delivery goal of chain for two (2) basins per month, beginning in about April, 1985. It is further recommended that staff be authorized to prepare plans and specifications and solicit bids for removal of existing chain and installation of the replacement chain. The purchase contract would be submitted to the Boards at their regular meeting in January for approval while the installation contract would follow shortly after. TMD/jm TMD.1126 Attachment - October 24 , 1984 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Tom Dawes COUN TY SAN ITAT ION D ISTRIC TS of Q RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (7 14)962-2411 SUBJECT: REPORT ON FIND I NGS OF SURVEY ON BUDD CHAIN DRIVES The following are the results of my te l ephone conversations with various agencies on their experiences with the Budd chain drives in their faci l ities. 1. Dade County and Water Sewage Age n cy Miami, Florida Carl Schultz -Maintenance Supervisor 305/665 -7471 Mr. Schu l tz said they have · Budd equipment for their final settling tanks which are 245 feet long. They have been in ser vice for about 8 months. These chains have given them very good service. Could recommend Budd . 2. Castaic Plant -Santa Barbara· Cou nty Wendell Pollock -Chief Operator 805/257-2055 . Mr . Po ll ock said t he equ ipme n t is · excel l ent . No problems with installation or delivery . The first sets were ins t al l ed about 1-1/2 years ago and they installed four more sets about 7 months ago . These were pu rchased directly through the manufacturer 's representative . 3. Lake Casitas Water Pl ant (Talked with Jim Mi tchell pf Gier lich-Mitchell Company and he indicated that this was not a tota l system -on ly partially Budd equipment . He then gave me references for two other applications . These are Nos . 7 and 8 of this report .) 4 . Simi Valley Sanitation District Simi Valley, Cal ifornia 805/583-0393 Mark Moise -Operator The Budd equipment is installed in their primary clarifiers . The first unit has bee n in .service about one year, There was some problem initially with the drive gears but it was a design prob l em rather than an equipment problem . The ch ains and flights have been problem free . These were purchased through the usual bidding process. -·- REPORT ON BUDD CHAIN DRIVE EQUIPMENT October 24, 1984 Page Two 5 . City of Los Angeles -Terminal Is l and -P lant Los Angeles , Ca lifornia This equ ipment is not on-lin e yet; therefore I did not contact them . Relayed to me by Jim Mitchell. 6 . City of Avalon -Catal i na Pl ant Catalina, Ca l ifornia John Romo -Chief Operator 213/510 -0731 This facility has the Budd equiptnent in· the chain dri ve unit only at this time, They are in the process· of replacing the metal ones in the flights. They have experien ced no problems with this equipment in the one year it has been in s ·ervice. Acquired this equipment through a purchase order -no bidding. 7. City of Yontville Yontville, Californ ia Bill Oppenner -Chief Operator 707/944-2988 This city is very p l eas ed with t h e Budd equipmen t. Bi l l said it was so simple to instal l -they needed only two men with crescent wrenches and no lifting equipment as a metal chain wou l d have required. The entire system is Budd and it has been -in service for about a month. Have a sma l l facility -on l y 40 mgd peak f l ow -but would recommend it highly for any size system . Made direct purchase from manufacturer's represent~tive . 8. City of Morro Bay Mnrro Bay, Ca l ifornia Darrell Richards, Chief Operator 805/772 -1214 Ext. 236 "You will think I 'm a salesman for Budd." Darrel said they couldn't be happier. The entire system is Budd . I t has been in service for two years . This equipment was the first of Budd's to be installed in California. Recently removed t he chains for inspection during expan- sion of facilities and the only thing observed was some scratches on the plastic. They experiepced no problems with delivery a n d have received excellent service. They inadvertently broke some pieces during installation ·and the parts were replaced with no questions asked. They purchased these chains by direct purchase order -no bidding involved. ' . REPORT ON BUDD CHAIN DRIVE EQUIPMENT October 24 , 1984 Page Three 9. Encina Waste Water Plant 619/438 -3941 LorenEttiene -Chief Operator This equipment has not been placed i nto service yet, other than testing with no water in the tanks. They have Jeffries in the three other tanks and haven't had any significant problems with that equipment . This Budd equipment was purchased through the bidding process . Loren also contacted some of the same agencies as I did and he found that most were very satisfied with the Budd equipment and that was the main reason (other than their price being lowest) they deciae_d to buy Budd . If you would like me to follow up on any of these contacts, let me know. Jean Anderson Background . - STATUS REPORT ON EFFORTS TO OBTAIN FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO ENABLE DISTRICTS' DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL RESEARCH PROJECT TO PROCEED 11/18/84 For the past several years the Orange County Sanitation Districts (OCSD) have been erigaged in marine studies with the Environmental Quality Laboratory of the California Institute of Technology (Cal Tech), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) pursuing a sludge disposal alternative described in the LA/OMA 1980 Sludge Management Report. This sludge disposal alternative would utilize the deep ocean off Southern California. The Orange County Sanitation Districts have offered to finance the construction of a deep ocean 24" diameter pipeline from the District's Plant No. 2 at the mouth of the Santa Ana River to an ocean depth of approximately 1000 feet some 8 miles off shore. Dilute, preconditioned sludge would be discharged through this pipeline for a 5 year period, during which extensive studies would be conducted by the marine research community to determine the effect of the discharge of municipal sludges on the ocean. The cost of the research effort is estimated to be $1.0 -$1.5 million per year. While most of the funding will come from the OCSD, it is anticipated that NOAA will fund those experiments considered to be of national interest. This project, however, cannot go forward without federal legislation to authorize the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to issue a research permit to OCSD and its other sponsors. 1984 Legislative Efforts During this past legislative year, considerable progress was made with House of Representatives Water Resources Subcommittee members. Up until the 11th hour committee members were prepared to submit a floor amendment to the proposed 1984 Clean Water Act which would have approved the Districts' Deep Ocean Sludge Disposal Research Project. However, at our request, they did not propose the amendment because we had not completed our compromise negotiations with the major environmental groups. An earlier agreement made between the Chairmen of the Public Works and Transportation Committee and the Water Resources Subcommittee with the environmental groups meant defeat to our amendment on the floor of the house if we did not clear the project with those groups. The Districts were successful in working out an agreement with the National Wildlife Federation to gain their support for a research project using half of the Districts' sludge for deep ocean research and half for remote land based alternatives and/or research projects. On the Senate side, OCSD has been working closely with staff of both California Senators. Senator Wilson was prepared to submit the OCSD research amendment on the Senate Floor when the Senate's version of the 1984 Clean Water Bill was before the full Senate. While the House passed its version of the Clean Water Bill, the full Senate did not consider its Committee adopted bill. Consequently, the Congress did not enact a Clean Water Bill for 1984. 1985 Legislative Efforts Both the full Committee Chaitman, Senator Stafford, R-Vermont, and the ·Subcommittee Chairman Senator Chaffey, R-RI, stated on the Senate floor in the closing 1984 sessions that the Clean Water Bill would be of high priority when Congress convened in 1985. Senator Roth of Delaware expressed his desires for early adoption of a new Marine Protection Research and Sanctuary Act (MPRSA). For two years now, the Senate has ignored the House efforts to amend the MPRSA. In this term of the Congress, OCSD will have the opportunity to seek permissive legislation in the Clean Water Act of 1985 and in the 1985 amendments to the MPRSA in both Houses of Congress. During discussions with the Senate Committee staff, they suggested the OCSD Research Project might be better in the ·MPRSA bill since it was related to the ocean. It is sugge~ted that OCSD continue their efforts with Committee members in both House and Senate with particular emphasis for support from California's delegation. MN-7 -2- . -' THE CITY OF ~l~I CALIFORNIA CITY COUNCIL CARREY NELSON MAYOR CLARICE A. BLAMER MAYOR PRO TEM SAM COOPER COUNCILMAN NORMA ARIAS HICKS COUNC.ILWOMAN JOHN H. SUTTON COUNCILMAN CIVIC CULTURAL CENTER Number One Civic Center Circle Brea, California 92627 Telephone (114) 990-7600 November 16, 1984 Mr. Wayne Sylvester General Manager Orange County Sanitation District P. O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 As per our phone conversation of Friday, November 16, 1984, concerning a smoking policy, I believe all meeting areas should be non-smoking, and all food and eating areas should be non- smoking. I believe that in an open landscape office area it should be non-smoking. While I realize that there may be very few smokers that will be affected, a greater number of non-smokers would similarly be affected by the smoke that is emitted. I am enclosing a copy of my City's smoking policy. I do believe that we al low smoking in certain conference areas. I personally am opposed to this situation. I intend to ask our City Council to eliminate smoking in all areas at the earliest opportunity. Sincerely, f I· ~/"/ / v _\j(Url../ Sam Cooper Councilman bas Enclosure: City of Brea's Smoking Poli cy All Employees CITY OF BREA MEMORANDUM FROM: Edward G. Wohlenberg City Manager SUBJECT: Smoking Policy DATE: October 24, 1984 Results of the smoking survey conducted in July have been distributed to the departments and posted at our various facilities. These are also available for review in the Personnel Department. Many showed some that real time and thought were put into your responses and it is appreciated. The results were quite informative and have helped us to evaluate our current policy and practice. The Executive Safety Committee reviewed the survey response and the Committee reconmended some minor revisions to our current policy. It appears that the current situation works, with relatively few problems. Smokers and non-smokers alike have accepted it. The current policy, as many of you may be aware, is: Smoking areas on the fifth floor inc.lude the balcony, conference rooms A, B, C, and D during official meetings (smoking is NOT PERMITTED in Conference Room E at any time) and enclosed offices with the door closed. No smoking where posted, eg •• Council Chambers. Accordingly, the existing policy will be maintained with the following amendments: 1. Smokers on the fifth floor should have an alternative to going outside or down to the fourth f 1 oar 1 ounge. Many currently use Conference Room c. Si nee the remade 1 ing p 1 ans underway now e 1 imi nate Conference Room C, the new conference room near the Finance Department wil l be designated as a "smoking area" during breaks when the room is not in use. However, this room wi 11 be available for City business throughautthe day. 2. The heating/air conditioning system is also being redesigned with th~ remodeling. The ventilation will be improved in the fourth floor employee lounge, the Dispatch Center and the new conference room mentioned above, so smokers and non-smokers may both enjoy our faci 1 it ies and smoke damage to the facilities will be minimized. Department Managers are responsible for the smoking policy in those levels or f ac i 1 it i es under their di re ct ion. The City Manager is responsible for common, public.or shared areas, including the fifth floor. In addition to these physical and procedural changes, the Safety Committee will look into offering stop smoking programs to employees. In summary, this policy emphasizes consideration of and by smokers and non- smokers alike. The employer is required to make the work environment mutually satisfactory, and we believe this policy strikes a reasonable balance. EGW:rl.69 cc: City Council ~IJ)t?41_~ Edward G. Wohlenberg a City Manager .I ( ( ( '•\) ~' . ' f Smo~<er-vs.~non-smoker battle heats up By Jan Hofmann I Active smoking is the leading year in the same journal found governments have passed laws The Register evidence for the first time of regulating smoking i.n offices cause of premature death in the nicotine in the urine of non-and public places. United States, according to Carbon monoxide. Hydrogen Surgeon General C. Everett smokers who lived with Orange County, which has had cyanide. An alkaloid poison Koop. About 350,000 smokers die smokers. Nicotine, by the way, a limited smoking ordinance so potent that only a few drops each year from heart disease is the poisonous alkaloid since 1975, is now studying the will kill a person. An invisible and cancer. mentioned above. possibility of strengthening and radioactive gas. And between 29 "Passive smoking appears to expanding that ordinance. The and SS known carcinogens. · But it is the other smokers pose a public health risk larger county supervisors, none of Every day, two·thirds of who have been getting increased than the hazardous air whom smokes, voted American workers involuntarily attention lately. Several new pollutants from all industrial unanimously last month to inhale those toxins and others on studies have found that they, emissions combined,'' Repace conduct the study. · the job. too, ·are af risk, although to a and Lowrey wrote in their study. Supervisor Bruce Nestande, lesser extent than smokers. The other third receive Between 500 and 5,000 passive The highest level of death who suggested the study, admits stronger doses of the same from toxins currently regulated "Orange County is not exactly poisons, but their exposure is smokers die from lung cancer as by the EPA is caused by coke . on the cutting edge of this. :;elf-inflicted. They are smokers a result of exposure to smoke, oven emissions -an average of .. By every measurable -active smokers, that is -and according to a new study by 150 deaths per year. A smelter the toxins are components of James Repace, a physicist and in Tacoma, Wash., was shut standard, smoking is a hazard: cigarette smoke. But the other policy analyst for the U.S. down because it emitted small We have to deal with it from two-thirds are smokers also. Environmental Protection amounts of arsenic, responsible that standpoint, just as we Passive smokers. Agency, and Alfred H. Lowrey, · for an estimated four deaths a inspect restaurants and other a research chemist at the facilities for health hazards." Laboratory for the Structure of year. \ I After more than 20 years of Nestande himself says he isn't studies linking cigarette Matter at the Naval Research • bothered by secondhand smoke. smoking to death and disease, Laboratory. More than 20 years ago, one of "I'm a politician. I'm used to most everyone is aware that A 1980 study published in the the first employees to sue an smoke-filled rooms,'' he says. smoking is a health hazard. The employer because of smoke in A smoking ordinance takes . tobacco industry contends that New England Journal of the workplace was told by the until science can explain how Medicine found that passive court to wear a gas mask on the effect next month in Los smoking increases th~ incidence smokers inhale the equivalent of job. Angeles. The ordinance gives of cancer and heart disease, the one to 10 cigarettes a day in employers six months to come fact that it happens is their eight hours on the job. And Thirty-seven states and Please se~ SMOKE/EB inconclusive. a Japanese study published this numerou3 city and county ••• ~~.. ; . ""-~ t' • . .. • ~ .. 1. k,1 1· ( ~ ~ .._ A-· • 't_, '~ ~a ~---.ns• FROM E1 up with plans to establish smoke-.. There's the common-law ob- free work areas or face a maxi· ligation of an employer to provide mum SSOO fine and six months in a safe work environment/• Rosner . jail. says. "And ·the Rehabilitation Act Many Orange County businesses of 1973 requires that any employer · already have banned or limited with more than S2,500 a year in smoking in their facilities. For federal contracts must make rea- those who haven't but are consid· sonable accommodations to any · ering it, there will be a free work-worker who's disabled. Smoke-sen- . shop Friday at the Westin South sitive employees have been consid- Coast Plaza hotel, featuring three ered disabled workers in numerous Seattle-based consultants who spe-court cases ... cialize in advising companies on Employees also can receive. health policies in general and smoking in particular. The work-worker's compensation for dam- shop, from 9 to 11 a.m., is spon-age to their health from smoke on sored by Orange County-based the job, and disability payments, 1 SmokEnders, the largest smoking Rosner' says. In one California cessation firm in the country. case, a man won the right to unem- Robert Rosner, president of the ployment compensation because consulting firm, says starting a he quit a job after his employer smoking policy involves more than failed to restrict smoking by other posting a "no smoking" sign. "It's employees. a pretty dramatic change for some Nestande ·says the legal question people," he says. "Smokers need is another good reason for Orange time to adjust. They need to under-County to deal with the issue. "If ·stand why the change is being we don't do something, we're going made. This (smoking) is a socially to start having lawsuits against accepted behavior that suddenly ourselves," he says. we learn is harmful." The county already has a work- Alan Byrn, a spokesman for the er's compensation claim pending Tobacco Institute, says the indus-by one county worker who is sensi- try opposes any legal restrictions tive to smoke. Anne Shattuck, a on smoking. social services worker iii Garden "Our position is, obviou~ly, since there is no scientific evidence that·. -Grove, won-an arbitration.decision· smoking is harmful, the bans and · based on the county's contract with restrictions are unjustified," Byrn the American Federation of State, says. "And they're basically unen-County and Municipal Employees, forceable, expensive to implement of which she is a member. The and discriminatory." county built her a separate office Byrn likens separate smoking with a separate ventilation system areas to segregation of blacks and as a result of the decision. · other minority groups, and says The Orange County study is that even if smoking were com-scheduled to be completed within pletely outlawed, "it does not 90 days of the Oct. 23 vote. mean that tobacco won't .be here. Nestande say.s he hopes to find a It'll just drive the product under-way "to make everybody happy" ground." with whatever ordinance the Byrn says the institute's official county develops. "A major factor's ,. . position is "there is no scientifi-going to be the reaction of the to- ~ cally established evidence that bacco industry. If they stonewall it ' shov.:s a ~ause-and-effect relation-and say, 'Don't change anything,' : ship between smoking and dis-it's just going to polarize things a : ease." lot more than is necessary." : . si:noking restrictions ma~e good Dr: Ed~und Gaulden, a Tustin t: business . sense, accordmg to card1olog1st, says he has kept ! · Rosner's partner, William Weis. 'track of the studies on smoking and r~. He estimates that each smoker health since 1948. But all the arti- ~· costs his employer more than cles he has read aren't really what ~ .S4.SOO a year because of increased has convinced him that smoking is !': absenteeism, more medical care, harmful. ::. early death, higher life insurance "What convinced me arethe peo- :: costs, time lost on the job, in- ~ creased. property damage and ac-g celerated depreciation, higher t: maintenance costs and harm to in· \~oluntary smokers. :: •' t.. · But what scares business admin-t istratorc; most is the possibility :·" · that non-smoking employees will : :. sue -and win -because of smoke :: _ in the workplace. . ,:'. -- pie who come into my office," he says. They are people with coro- nary artery disease, deteriorating· heart muscles; high blood pres- sure, angina, irregular heartbeats, clots blocking their arteries. Some of them are so weak they can hardly walk across a room. And almost all of them -90 to 95 per- cent -are smokers or former smokers. Less than 3o percent of Calif or- nians smoke, according to a study published earlier this year in the Sacramento Bee. · "The tobaccp industry has said for many years that you can't prove smoking does anything bad because you can't show exactly how it happens," Gaulden says. "That's a lot like saying you can't prove a virus causes a disease be- cause you can't see it." Gaulden advises all his patients not to smoke. Many of them can't stop, however. He says he under- stands why. "It's an addiction. It's the worst kind of addiction, be- cause it's available in every comer store, and it's considered socially acceptable." . --r -Meanwhile, says Rosner, '~The emphasis is shifting from personal, health to public health. It's like if' you want to kill yourself, go ahe~d~J But do it in your own environ7 ~ ment." RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS DECEMBER 12, 1984 -7:30 P.M .. ( :: J> Furm l'l!o G -ic·i:i I ,:~ , I :,: : !"i ··f c Ii :. i ~ j :,., 1,,! ', 1 :11::i;:. i:.~cn !:. i. I , I'"' h,,.,_.. l11H : E!l I''~ 1:~ l~tRR.tiNT f.10. !•71(51 ".' 71652 •171 f.53 (;71654 ... 7Hf~> ''1] (:.~~ i!71E:57 OH5A Hl659 r1 11 ~6 1•1 '7Hf.1 ;,; 1 ]l-62 (.) 71663 ::11 !>Elf 'J71~6~ ''7H6f. :":71F-67 ~71 f:68 ; .. .'00 fl7Hi69 I .. ,: Hl67:l ) I t"7167l I .. ~ ---0 71 f.7;> .-.F-.• 7 l !:1 :s .. r 1'!71f7" ,,~ rJ7lf:75 .. ~ r.1 71676 :U> 'J71f77 :1t;d !17167~ I ......... l'7 ! ~ 7~ ··("""') ,. 7 l !·8·i ._____. "7 lbP.1 I~ 1, !VJ .~ 7 HB2 ! ' ~ 7168 ~ 1 •. :i· ::1 H-f.<4 I, ·7~~~~ .u· , ... ' :: ... :r ~ :: :71H6 :.'1? 1-e 1 ~716P8 ;1ie.~o -~ 71 F-9r. '.·71~':?1 ·17u:c2 ... 7 H:93 "7 l '-~" ; 7 H:9? '7H~f ( -JT OISf WCP~J~~ CJflTAL F~OCESSJN6 DATE 11~~P/A4 PAGE REPORT NUM~ER AP43 1 ( .:-- ·-----;.-; COUNTY SANJHTJON OJSTRJCTS OF Ot;ANGE COUNTY u CLAI~S PAIO JJIJlf/84 ''.I V~NfJOR AJP CALJFCPNJA AIP FOLLUTJON CONTROL ASSN. AIF PRODUCTS ~ rHtMICALSt INC• ALL·STATE vr~ICLfSt INCi AMfRJCAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS A~F.RICA~ TECH~JC~L SUP~LY THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. AQUA BEN CORr. ARCO GLASS i MJPPOP AROOW•P.lSCOi JNCe PALPH W• ~T~JN~ON BAKrR PLYWCOC CO., INC. BASIN VALVE'S ~ECKHAN INDUSTRIAL BIERLY & ASSOCIATES, INC. 81 G BOX R (NTH C 0 •·· -·-·-·----· ·-· ··-· · BOMAR M~GNrTO SERVlrE, INC. ~ROOKS INSTRUMENTS BU~EAU OF GOV RESEARCH----··--··-- THE BURKE COMPANY BUTIER ENGINEERING, INC. C ~ R ~ECONOIT JON ING· COi · CPT CALIFORNIA• INC. CS COMPANY CALIF• WEST H[AT'trvo·&· AJft··c-oNOITION1NG- CAMPBf.LL HEATING & AIR CARMENITA FORD TPUCK SALfSt INC. JOHN .. CIROLLO fNG JNE·£PS ··--· ··-· CAqqJER AIP CONDITinNING CO C~fVRON u.s.A., INC. CLAPK llYE' 1-iOOWARE · - CONNELL CHf.VROLET CONROCK C0fo1PANY CONSr.LJOATEO ELECTRICAL·DJST. CONTJNrNT&L CHEMICAL CO CO~TINENTIL RA~IATOR COOPf.R f.NfFGY Sf.RYJffS COSTA MESA AUTC FARTS, INC. CAL CONSOLJDATEO ~ATEP STr.Tf. OF C~LIF~~NJA OAJLY rJLCT C .I\ NIEL ~ TI P. e Sf.. RV J C E TOH C'A\JfS rE~KER JNST~UMfNl SUFPLY co. DECO OC.::LPiJ -~YC:TH'S• Jt•c. S366 • 'Jfl · A IR· FARE· AMOUNT DESCJ)IPTION !:: ' : .: I S68.r.~ SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL s11.~45.99 SOLVENTS Sli498il0 ~EHICLE LEASING $196.90 LAB SUPPLIES Sl58.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES $2 ;iJ~6 • 4~ · --·----:· --pu"p · PARTS $34,913.72 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS $42.40 GLASS -s,:n··;75· ..... ----·-··ELECTRICAt-·suPPLIES -.. ---· ----·-··-- s1.~63.21f PUMP PARTS $385.88 SMALL HARDWARE · --·-·-·-·····--·-·· S-757•50 ·-·-·-····----vAt;VU··· -··· ··----··-.. ··· ..... ·-···· -·· · S40D.60 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $550.00 WORKERS' COMP. ADMINISTRATORS: S82 3•·tto ----·-·--· ---·-TR1'.SH-o l"S'POSAt· ....... --................ --··· .. . $117.84 ENGINE PARTS $342.49 VALVES ·--. $21\0e·oo-------ufttNAR-REG-ts·TRATI ott··---········· ------·-· .. -- :'t , .. , ::'., i:: t,, 11 .. I :11. ... · 1::1 I,., ~ ..! i:.'.I: J1 ..... i:·, 1:··! 1•·' u .... :·:; S31e80 BUILDING MATERIALS . ·j $16 t658. DO CONSTRUCT I ON MANAGEMENT P2-23-6, VAR I OUS PL T. PROJ. J ·--·s!;53·;ott·. -------···puMPltEPAIRS". --------.. -----.......... ' --. ··i $416.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 S16.95 FREIGHT · ---····------· S33e86---------A·tR·toNDU .. l-ONUG· .. REPAtts···---------- St5.DC PLANS AND SPECS REFUND S36.97 TRUCK PARTS SABi 86 · ------·-· · ENGR~--DIGESTER· GAS STuov-- S9QO. OO TRAINING SEMINAR Sl6t766e5~ ENGINE OIL, GASOLINE f.12 '3 • 98 · -·-· · -· ·TOO ts-··-·-· · · ···· · $1f34.73 TRUCK PARTS S415e29 BUILDING MATERIALS s4,q54.~7 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES S5t991f.3C CHLORINE $478.92 TRUCK REPAIRS S4,64q.aa ENGINE PARTS $774.7S TRUCK PARTS SJ~5.5D RESIN TANK EXCHANGE, WATER SOFTENER RENTAL f16~.n~ ANNEXATION #358 PROCESSING FEE $54.95 LEGAL ADVERTISING l3~Jn~.85 TRUCK TIRES !37.39 MEETING EXPENSES $621.4~ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $~~8.22 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES il~?.~C MINI COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES I .. , "'I "'' ,II :,! H r::j ·'I ~ ::: : '·i "i i '1 1:·1 !''' i .. •• := :::t> FUND NO I N := WARFA~T NO. ,1·· ':1 .. ~ ·m :~ . :t> i. ,. I f!o-4 !:-t !:~ I I !:=tt: 00 I : .... ')> 'r 'J 1. Lt:::9 ........ j'(/) "H i·ci:c .. !!"""'4 1(1 1':-t i (/) r I.: 1 111; 11· : .. ' 1.:: I ... , I := '·:t> , I :N ::: n16~1 'HlE-98 "7ll:99 '171 H'! 01 7~·t ~· 71 7~~2 1•7 ! 7 :J:': '!7 l 7•J4 0717t;5 n7! 71!~ ~7!7':7 '.'7t7:;R r-111 oq 01111n 'J71711 fl7! 712 •n t 713 1:717!4 071715 ~71716 Hl7l7 · ".1717! R n71 71 c:i •Hl 721 tH 1 721 f'l7172~ il71 723 "'71 nt+ (• 71 72~1 •}111U:. ·~71727 ~11nfi l'71 n'? r,71 7~ n r,11731 HJ 7~? ~~11133 '•71734 ·::7 l 735 "71 73f ;l] l 7~7 ... 7 l 7.'f:. .. 1717~9 ·"'71 71•t: fi7 ~ 7 41 "1 J 74~ ( •qrQ · JT l)JST wr.;;KlNf CH ITAL PROCESSING 96Tf. 11/tl$/84 P~GE REFORT HUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANJT~TION DIST~ICTS OF ORANCl COUNTY H N[IOR ~f~·PAP. S~L(S ~ SFRVICf OIGIDYNE COMPUTER SfRVlClS DUMA! DIESEL INJ~CTJON OUNN EOYAPDS CORP• FIN CO~PANYt INC• ft~CO ~POCl~S FOUIP. Co. EASTMAN• l~C. FALCON OISFOSAL SERVICE FILTER SUFPLY CO. FJSC~F.R & PORTfR CO. FISHER CO~TROLS FISHER SCirNTIFJC co • FLO-SY STEMS CLAIMS F~IO 11114/84 AMOUNT DESCRIPTtON i319.3~ TOOLS s1.J26.~8 MINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE st.41~.8G ENGINE PARTS S23A•~O PAINT SUPPLIES S7~6.2~ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES S932e80 PIPE SUPPLIES ns2.12 . .• OFFICE SUPPLIES S26t23l.10 SLUDGE HAULING AND DISPOSAL S372e46 ENGINE PARTS !2t'l33e03 ...... _ ..... -·· ·Pl'PE·SUPPUES· $284.33 REGULATOR PARTS S'l3.46 LAB SUPPLIES Sl t 176 • 60 ·-·-----·-····PUMP· PARTS · ···- st. 05 De 60 WATER USEAGE S36.00 LOCKS 2 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY FOUNTAIN VALLEY LOCK & SAFr. THE FOXBORO CO~PANY S2t244•65· -····· ··-··-···El:ECTU·CAl .. SUPPLIES .. ·· · ··--· ··· -... FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY• INC. GA~AHL LU"B(R CO. GENF.RAL TELf PHONE co, GIF.RLICH"HJTC~ELL• INC. GREAT LAKES INSTRUM£NTSt INCo HO! 0 If S El MACH I NE · · · ·· · · · -· ---·· ---· ... -· · · ... ~ALPRI~ SUPPLY CO. HALSTED i HOGGAN, INC. TED Ae HAHMF.TT HARPINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTtCS HOLMES ROOFIN~ co., INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON-PEACH· HUNTIN~TON BEACH ~U~BER STAMF JMPfRIAL AUTOMOTIVE DISTR~ IMPERI~L WE~T C~EHirAL COe JNMAC JNTEROX At'rPICA !~VINE FA~C~ WATEP CISTRICT J~SSfE APFLIANCf SEPVICE CO. PoPe JCHN HAULING l<oE.eC• COMFANY KAP PPODUCTS KAS SAF~TY PRODUCTS ~JNF Pf ~RJNft INC. KIRST PUMP F H~CHtNE ~ORKS l•R•\.i•~•t 11\!Ce w.k. LtinS::WIG en • LAFRV 1 S P.LOG. MATfRlALS, I~~. H.V. LAWNMASTF~ f. CO, lNC. l€PNER PHOTO. INr • $3~.oo LAB ANALYSIS S557.66 LUMBER S9t740•9lt· ·-···-·-·----·-TElE·PHONE Slt691.24 GEAR BOX PARTS S9tl83e'IO LAB SUPPLIES -·· ·· .. ··M981~1J--·· --·-··-·· .. ·TRUU-REfAI RS S8J6.77 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $269.59 CONTROL EQUIPMENT S28h00 ·--····-VAIWUM·-TRUCKI NG S'l'l3e63 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES S5~3.00 ROOF REPAIRS S9t9l)6e93 ····-----·WATER USEAGE··-· s232.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES $149.~6 TRUCK PARTS s1.1s2.4~ FERRIC·EHLORtOE ~3~3.38 COMPUTER REPAIRS !'171676.68 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE DOSEAGE SYSTEM $4~~0 • ·WATER USEAGE !?95.~n REFRIGERATOR $J,fq6.75 WOOD SHAVINGS $~4•623.72 CONTRA~TOR 3-2~-1 \295.25 FREIGHT $139.P.2 SAFETY SUPPLIES i2 • 82G. 78 BEAR I NG ·suPPL I ES S5·&18.~4 PUMP PARTS $119.0 2 WELDING SUPPLIES t1q7.~~ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $2?.Jlf TOOLS !q3.l5 TESTING P2-26 ~1~.~1 FILM PROCESSING ( II Ir/ ( i;·1 1, i:·.', l'I ... I, .. 1 ... ; ... I.,' " /r 1:·· i ~; i '.~ . : I l.' (. , .. C::'> :: ( ( )> FUN[' HJ .I ~ :: ~1 A R R H T ~· C\ • ~·7i7'(~ r.11 744 ~71 745 , ... r!7 ~ 7"6 i (, 1!747 '• 7) 741.'. ii7J 7'f9 '1)> ':'7 l 751J :.Ci) f•71 751 iJTl '•71 752 .'.·E3 '711~·3 {; 7 l 754 I'~ •n 11s~ ti:•: I. r7J756 I~ ~71757 ~7l 7!;~ 1:¥= "71759 : ::a:t: 17 J 7£.0 ,po nJ7H ·····1 ~71 762 I.'. r71763 r~ !1717M i--"17 J 7!>5 j.r.-ir-!'71 766 I t:::t 1;71767 , ......... ~117f8 ,en ') 71 76~ I.~ !"; 71 77'1 '~ "71 771 I. f71 77~ ·("'"') ;.~ ~;71773 !.(l/) i:7177'+ , .. : r.1111~ !::: f'7 ! 77~ '1 7!777 r-7' 1n'. ~7l77Q 1;717P.J I Hl 7Hl l11'. C7l7t.'2 l ( 7 ! 7t'?. •,7 J 7114 :". 7 J 7P.~ '.' 7 l 7f'F- '..'7!7f.7 •·7 1 7PP :: > , I ':·\.N :: ~,~~ -JT DISl WCP,lN~ C6F ITAL ~~CC~SSING D~TE Jl/~e/84 FAGE RfPORT NUMBER ~F43 3 COUNTY SANITATION OJSTPltTS OF ORANGf C~UNTY CL~I~S PAIO 11/lq/84 Vf "IDOH l(WCO EL[CTRIC C~e LIGHTI"!G OJSTRHWTOPS• INC. L05 ANG~LES TJMFS LO~PY P. AS~OCJATES M ~ L TP.UrK enov MAHOEN SUSCO M~~Y~C ELECTP.ONJCS MATT -C~LORt INC. MILLEPS F'PJNTEPY HINf SAFETY APPLlJINCES co.··· ~ONTGOMERY ELEVATPR CO~PANY J. ARTHUR MOORF, C~, INC. MOTOROlAt INC• HYCO INOUSTPJ[S NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL r.cc10nnAL ·CHE'MJCAL·CORP• OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE-CASHIER OCEAN SALT co., INC. OLYMPIC CHEHIC~L-COt -·--· ORANGE VALV~ & FI)TJNG COe OR JTEX CORF · O XV GF: N Sr R V I CE · -· -· · --·· · -----· -· · · --· --· · · COUNTY OF ORANGf co. OF ORANGE•AUOITOR CONTROLR COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS·-OF-ORANGE·· COUNTY· PACIFIC BELL PAPTS UNLIHJTEO PfRO~IOATJON SYSTEMS• INCi FHTLiOf LPHIA GEAR CORP roNTON INCUSTRJESt INC. HAROLO P~l"POSf ICE MIKE PPLICH i SONS RAFFERTY INlfRNATIONAL TRUr.~s P.AJ~P.OW ~ISFOS~L CO. ~E-CY-KLfEN CO~P. THf REGISTER ~OAR INS & ,.,EYER~ ROCCO'S TRUC~ WRECKI~G SAJ.:COtJ INC. YV ONNf SCl-l\:t'.e SHAMFQCK SUHLY SOUT~ C9AST OFFICE EQUIFMfNT 89tiTHEPN CALIF. lOJ~ON CO. SO. CALIF. £DISON CO. SO. CAL. f-AS CC.. ~nVTMfRN r~u~TJr~ OlL r.o. AMOUNT !r88?..51 S.231.lf't DESCRIPTION HE CTR IC CART PARTS-· ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Slt11~.~8 LEGAL ADVERTISING it9tl76•43 ·· ENGR. 2 00 25 Slt9~a.oo TRUCK PARTS tl~S.76 PIPE SUPPLIES t9 !J. 76 · -• ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES '401.51 PIPE SUPPLIES S5De24 PRINTING S%• 94 ···-·-----SAFETY·-SUPPL I ES· S328.48 PLANT #2 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE S5~5.23 PIPE SUPPLIES · --MOCJi82· · --·--·--·EL Ee-TR I eAt SUPPll ES· S219.t0 SMALL HARDW~RE S60.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION S4;231.-l'f·----· ---CAUSTIC·· SODA· $5Jn.oo OCEAN MONITORING S322.13 SALT -$77t23h08-· ·----CHLORINE···-· -· --- S1t365.7J PIPE SUPPLIES S449e4~ BEARING SUPPLIES --· ·· ·s21 iJ .-4~ · ·· · ···---· --· ··S-PE·c-t At:-T-Y · OAS ES· !614.51 LAB ANALYSIS !.53.341).00 SltlA7i6't--·- sto.49 st' 289. 80 Sl5tl2li37 u1.920.16 S757.9fl $3h00 H~3tl65e6C' $58 .11 s 3-55e10 U27.62 t.Sf:lt.~2 S42e45 $1,')6:).•Jl\ ~52t7Het\C $1?. 3~ '£5,914.55 $2. 1!~2. ~ft sH .. 616.;>9 'l16 !l. u c: is.2'.)1.?D "1P.t2q~.1,q COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES --------RHHBURSE· WORKERS .... tOMP•··FUND · -·- TELEMETER I NG TRUCK PARTS -HYDROGEN· PEROXIDE GEAR BOX PARTS FLOW METERS INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING 16E · CONTRACTOR 3-28R TRUCK PARTS TRASH· DISPOSAL ENGINE PARTS LEGAL ADVERTISING PUMP PARTS TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR l-2R-2&3 EMPLOYEE HI LEAGE TOOLS, SHALL HARDWARE OFFICE FURNITURE POWER CSDOC #5 REPAIRS NATURAL GAS DIESEL FUEL ( Tl I '.:! 1' I • : .. , l.j . ;·:1 ~ •:·1, '.-:1 .H ,··1 lo I '·I 1···: 11··1 :·.1 j'.-;1' ., .. --· .. I ... "·1 . :I .. j :ii 1:;i I I"' -: . •' ''· ·i I i 11·.: 11•1 ::· I l .. -• :=: )> I .J::' :=: 0: •I )> en rn 2 t::j )> t~ !~ I. .:b:: 00 !,, I I~ :r: ;II=' ,~ (/) I~ 1~ 1Q. :GI> j:: I, ... ... : I' I; 1.: l.' ·"· ,,,· .. :=: :t> .. I ~ .... n1r•r: r·10 1,! APP /. r •• T M 0. :,7 J 78'::1 r: 71 79'' 1!7 ~ i91 HJ 79? "1' 133 "'7 ~ 7911 q 1 7C:5 ~71 796 '"7 t 797 f1 7 J 7'?8 n 11e:c; ~~71fi 1H· f 71f;('J ~7lfle? 071P~'5 "7tf"n4 t•7J P.tl" "71 e: .• ~ '•7Jeo1 07JHA 07?AIJ~ ':'718H i.'7 H!l l ':7Jfl~ fl 71f!l3 ~t71 p llf ~7lf'l5 •:7 t f16 ··11~11 ~.71~!J.i "71~19 ( ·::. 1 t' '? • J 1 r. l S T W c PI< I N f r. AP IT H f P 0 C E SS 1" G 0 A Tl: 11 / 1 ':t I R 4 PAGE 4 Rf PORT HUMREP APq3 COllNTY SANITAl ION DISTP.ICIS OF O~~NGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAJC 11/14/84 Vf"Nl)OR SPlEDE SPEEOOMETEP ~ENNIS STEF~£NSON ~UPERICR ll~E & CHE~JCAL COPr. THf SUPPL J f P.S J. W~YNf SYLVESTr.R TAK TAKAMJNf. TICOR TITLE JNSURAMCE TRANSAMF.P.JCA OELAVALt INC. TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLYt INC. TUP.ESALES JeGe TUCKfR 8 SONt JNCe TUReOCH4RGfFt INC. FRANK ULT It-1\> UNION CIL CO. OF CALIF. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNIVER~ITY SALFS & SEPVJCE VM~ SCIENTIFIC VALLEY c111r.s SUPrLY co. V~LLEY ENGINE & M~C~INE · VALVE & STEfl SUP~LY CO. VAkECt INC. V Jl(J NG FREI GtH SYSTfMS ,. INC i .. ··-.. ·-.. · · ---.. LARRY ~ALKE~ A~SOCIATES• INC. JO ... N R. WAPLES WAUKESHA·fNGINE SERYICENTER WESTCOAST ROTORt INC. WESTALLOYt INC. WESTI~GHOUSF ELECTRJC·CORP T ... OMAS L. woor.~Ufft JNC. y .. Tl p~ ZIP TEMPORARY PF.RSONNEL TOTAL Cl~IMS FAIO 11/llf/P.4 Af~ OUNT SHol9 u5.q9 s 1~·5. 79 $R'!.1e55 S7H.33 't2t99'let"!l t375e:J~ I S.572.3R SS, U9 J .3iJ $~17•28 $21513.42 \5111J3.67 S2t685•'lD see.23 S51f .95 S363e68 ·· $971.lf3 S1'723. 8ft S231i69 i561f.51f Slf1S15.H ··-s·31flf•25 ss.a~t,.63 S393.66 u. !J08i·lf8 $l t061. IJ6 SH9e9A Slt520i80· Slf62.:)5 $4 :)1. 23 S836•B!l !·72;)e297t5q ---------------------------------- ( DESCRIPTION TRUCK REPAIRS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE BUILDING MATERIALS -TOOLS, SAFETY SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PLANT MAINTENANCE 7-8 TITLE FEES ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS ··· -·TUBING·SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS RETENTION PW-116 GASOLINE DELIVERY SERVICE ·-TRUCK· REP-A I RS· LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES -···--· .. -·TRUCK REPAIRS VALVES PIPE SUPPLIES · · .... -. ·---FRE·I GHT··-· · -·· -· ..... · · ······--···· ·· ·· -·· ·· CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT P2-23-6 ODOR CONSULTING .. ----··-··ENGINE· PARTS-·· --· ·· PUMP PARTS WELD I NG· SUPPL I ES .... -.. _ ... ··· ·EtECTRI Ckt:··SUPPL I ES . .CONFERENCE EXPENSES TRUCK Tl RES TEMPORARY HELP (' ,,.. I , ~ i I' 1'" i'.'! .,, '! (; •.I "! I t ~: ': !111 I (:i i,., I··; ! :1; 1 ·; . •' I 0 ! :: )> I \.n :: :?> '··iG'>. . ,rn ·:::::::: ' t:::j ' ::r:> ........ -I ... rn .. ·'3 ·; :~ : 00 : I :. !::r:> :. I I ~ ........ ' . '(/) . ; .--1 ···=;o' ' ......... '" :. -I i,(/) :: > I U1 :: ( FUND NO 9199 JT WORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING DATE 11/08/84 REPORT NUHBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIHS PAl-0 11/14/84 SUHHARY AHQUNT #2 OPER .FU~D $ 3,717.59. #2 ACO FUND 19,176.43 #3 OPER FUND 9,724.70 #3 ACO FUND ... ...... . .. -·----·---·· ... ________ fi3,.H~ .• ~3 #3 F/R FUND 35,125.40 . ----· -----. ·-· ....... ·-·--··-..... . .. #5 OPER FUND 236.45 #5 ACO FUN~. .. .. .... ·--· . . .. . .. _ . _ .. -· __ ~02 .•. 85 . #7 OPER FUND 9,039.71 17 F/R FUND 375.00 ( PAGE I 11 oeER F~ .. ~ ----·---. . .. . -·-------..... _,. ______ ·--·----___ 5. ~§i. Q~. -------·--·-·----------------·----. ,, ___ . ·--.. -·---·-·---------· ·-··· .... #5&6 ACO FUND 181.26 #6&7 OPER FUND 10.005.52 JT OPER FUND __ ----··· . ___ ... ·---·--··------·--·----------.. ····-· .. 35i.!37.57 ... CORF 147 1 892.57 SELF FUNDED WORKERS 1 COHP. INSURANCE FUND 1•737. 64 JT WORKl~G ~~.i»Lr~t:. .. f'.ll.!H~ _ .... ------·--·· --·-----·------··-·-·--~~-._g_g~~~---·-·-----·------~---·--···-·--------·--···-·----··· ---·-----...... CLAIMS PAID 11/14/84 $720,297.59 5 ·-. -',"1 ;.,. -·''• • I I 1"' Irr,; ·-·----r :I~. I"'· r .... _. __ ,::1 ~t. ttl n lt It IOtl l.t a: I( "t 'ii tt It ."t II -1: -L 'll ~ ti Cl u ·~ l .. 1. ....... !' .. , ;:1· .. , ··········1 1"'1 !11 ; ' 11.1 :.:! .. ·j. ; .. i •' . I I"' I ,I ,I ; I :,I !.-1 .!' ::: tpFUNO fvO I . ~ ::: WARRMH NO. D71A63 071~6'1 ll7J P65 071A66 Hl~H . r-71868 071869 J> 071&70 a") !•71871 m: 071872 ::::;!!: t:::1 071873 :x:;-· 071874 ~ 071875 -H 071876 IT.Jj 071f77 ~! C71e.78 r 'i C•71879 :at:' Q71680 op 0 7 l 8A1 F" 11~· 07lf.82 071M3 :J:?i, 071884 p:· 07 Jflfi5 t:::j, 071A86 0718117 ..+t: 0718RA ().), t!71f!fl9 ~: l! 11 ~qo ....... 07189] (!) 07lf.92 ~-071 &93 I 07189'l i.'., 071 f\95 1 I 071P96 !'" lJ7lt<97 071898 071149q 011 qoo 1)71901 0719\12 (J71~·"~ 0719ll't 071905 071906 071 Cjf.7 1i11c;ue ::: tP g ~ :=: 9159 -JT DIST ~ORKINb Cl~JTAL PROCfSSING DATE 11/26/B~ PAGE Rf PORT NUMBER AP43 1 '1, .... ( COUNTY SANITATION OISTRJCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Cl~l~S PAID 1ll2R/94 VUJOOP ACf DRAPERY CO. ACTION INSTRUHfNTS. INC. A DUNC O C OhSTR UC TCft St l NC• AIR CALIFORNIA AlF"•LAVAlt INC. ALLEN ELECTRIC CO • AMERICAN DISTRlCl TELEGRAPH AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY ANAH£1H SfMER CO~ST~UCTION ANG[LICA RENTAL S[RVIC£S GROUP AQUA BEN CORP. ARROW•RISCOt INC. ARROWHCAD ELECTRIC CORP. RALPH We ATKINSON AC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLYt INC• HILARY BAK£P BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA BAS IN VALVES bECK~AN INSTRU~ENTS J.P. BEECHER ASSOC., INC. ROefP.T BEINtWllllAM FROST & ASSOCIATES ANTHONY BISHOP BLA~Et MOFFITT & TOMNE BRENNER-FIEDLER I Assoc., INC. BRISTOL PARK MEDICAL GRPot INC BRITHINEE ELECTRIC ~UTIER ENGINE£RING1·INC~ C~Llfo lSSOCe OF SAN. AGENCJ£S JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEEPS JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS COHPRESSOR l JNOUSTPIAL CONROCK COHPANY CO~SOLIDATEO £l£CTPIC~l DJSTe CO~SOLJDATCD REPROD~CTIONS CONTINENTAL CHlHJCAl C~ COOFER ENERGY SE~VJCtS CAL WATER OM[• INCe DECKER INSTRUMENT SUPPLY rn. C'ECO OLLPhl SYSTl"S' me. OIGIDYN[ COMPUlER srRVJC[S OOHA~O ENT[RFRJSESt INC. OWYER INSTRUM£NTt INC. fASTHAN, INC. lNCHMHER, INC. AMOUNT $11195.68 $362.59 S251 tfS32e10 Sl78e00 S'hllSRe95 S24t591e03 S59.00 S58le37 S9t60h35 $125.00 $141602.10 S592e2't $162.72 Sl t063e24 $83110 S53.30 st ,395.57 Slt131e75 S173e85 $281.96 $21500.00. $23. 78 Slft72t.56 S~lle•'9 Sl3e00 $l t 053. 89 no ,~62.90 s1so.oo S2t282e82 UD9tb35e07 $570.00 $208.72 $31522.•1 Slt9G3.12 Sl t998el 0 !.96e25 Ulf 2. 7~ l976.26 !2~8.50 t3A5e8~ 1.1351).10 $807.50 s2 • .3SAe'IO $117.19 $407.65 S3t500.i;O ( DESCRIPTION WINDOW COVERINGS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR~e2~is~2 AIR FARE ENGINE PARTS CONTRACTOR PW-118 ALARH SYSTEM MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES CS DOC . 13-·HANHOLE REPAIRS TOWEL RENTAL CHEMICAL COAGULANTS ---.. ··-ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS ····-·--wlRE -------- EMPLOYEE MILEAGE TRAVEL EXPENSES ·vAtVU LAB SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES .... '"ENGR:··7~9 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES ---coKPRESSOR. PARTS .. PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMS I ,. . :l :·i , .. I 1": .. ·:I : .... 1,., l11 ! : J . I !•.: v ELECTRICAL R.E PA I RS · .-1: -·-·--·-·-···---ENGR·;· p2;23•6, VARIOUS PL.ANT ... PROJECTS, CLAIH REVIEW~, .. : CONFERENCE REGISTRATION i .; ENGR. P2-25-2 ' I ENGR; Pi~26, Pl~21,·p2~28,-ENERGY TASK FORCE COMPRESSOR PARTS BUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION CHLORINE ENGINE PARTS WATER SOFTENER RENTAL ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES COMPUTER PROGRAMMING MINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE PLANT #2 REPAIRS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OCEAN MONITORING ( .. , I ~ ! .•' ._ 1 ::: t::J:j ( ( ( I N• FUND ~O ::: WARUNT NO. 071'109 011c;1~ "' 071911 .,; 071912 i·: ·' ~· rr.;· z·1 '='··I :tt~. .....+.· -4-1, ~ -~! ·oq.:· Ii·", ··1 .~I . It 1· q· .-c;s: ~; t--e: n.· -4 (/.) , . :··· 1·' I ::: t::J:j . 'ii f'V ::: tl71913 0719H 1'71915 071916 071q17 l71918 0719PJ . l\11920 071 q21 071 q22 07lf?23 07192/f 1)71925 071926 ll71927 071928 071929 H193() 071931 071932 071933 071931\ 071935 071936 (!71937 07 l 93A 071939 (\719lf0 tH 1941 071Q'+~ C:71 Q1f3 0 71 C)'tlf 071945 071946 ll719H 071948 071949 071550 !1715!:>1 C\71~5:? Ci7JG53 (. 7155lf 91~9 -JT DIST WORklNG C~PlTAL PROCESSING DATE 11126/84 PAGE Rf PORT NUMBER AF43 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORA~GE COUNTY VENDOR FALCON DISPOSAL S£RVICf FISCHER & PORTER co. Fl~HER CONTPOLS CO• FISHER SCl[MTIFJC CO. FLO-SYSTEMS FLOYO-KORDICKt J•Y• FO~BORD/JOROANt INC CITY OF FULLERTON GANAHL LUMBER CO• GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. GIERLICH•MITCHELLt INC. GRAPHIC CONTROLS H-B INSTRUMENT COMPANY H.R. NURSERY HACH COMPANY LARRY HALL'S w.c. HENOP.I[ & CO., INC. ClTV·Of-HUNTINGTON·8EACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON nEACH INGRAM PAP[ff INSTRUMENTATION UBORATORYtlNC ·· THE JANITOR'S SHOPPE 1<.r.c. COMPANY KAHAN BEARINGS & · SUPPL-Y··-- KING B£ARINGt INC • KU EN•L JNE CORP LePeViS•t INCe LERU£R PHOTOt INC. LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLt CHARLOTT[ He H~PTIN MARVAC [LECTRONICS MCHASTfH-CARR SUPFLY CO. J. ARTHUR MOOR[, CAt INC. E.~. HORJTl FOUNDRY MOTOR RlH g WHEEL SE~VJCE MOTOROLA, INC. MVCO INDUSTRIES NAT10N~L LU~eER SUPPLY NATIONAL SAUJTARY SUPPLY NELSON-DUNN, INC. CITY or ~EW~ORT f[ACH NUHATIC ENGINEERl~G OCCIDfNTAL r.HEMICAL COP.r. OLY~FJC CHf.HIC~l CO. O~ANGE VALVC & FJTTJNG CO. CLAIMS PAID 11/28/84 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION s11.79q.25 SLUDGE HAULING AND DISPOSAL s2ao.oo PIPE SUPPLIES S15~.11 ·-REGULATOR PARTS $20.45 LAB SUPPLIES Slt't03e75 PIPE SUPPLIES S35t9~9•12 CONTRACTOR PW-132 $757.66 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $119.19 WATER USEAGE S171•23 TOOLS $657.01 TELEPHONE S190t=3Hell8 BELT Fl.LTER ~RESS CONTl\OL UNtTS S335i 't6 · ·· · ... ----El:E&TR I C~l ·SUPPLIES St33.58 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $28.'tl LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES S53le80 ·· ·-··· ···· LAB··SUPPU ES S185e50 TRUCK REPAIRS $5lq.37 PIPE SUPPLIES ··$13160-··---··--·----WATER-USEAOE- S268tJ26e25 SEHi ANNUAL WARNER RELIEF II PAYHENT S1t620e21 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES · · ..... · · S392•20 -···-· ·· -···-· --·---·-LAB···SUPPl I-ES S53.23 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES $12t436e60 CSDOC #3 MANHOLE REPAIRS, CONTRACTOR 3-24-1 -S300a 70 ----· -----BEAR I NO·· SUPPL I ES -· · · ··· · ··-·· S1t23l.63 BEARING SUPPLIES S73e67 SHALL HARDWARE S 3 6 8 ' 0 9 .. · · · ·-· · · · · · -W El D I NG · SUPPL I E S $25e6't FILH PROCESSING $172.95 ELECTRIC CART PARTS $22•50 ·--SAFETY SUPPL I ES S123.26 LIABILITY CLAIM SETTLtHENT $16.08 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $211~32 ·PIPE SUPPLIES S282el5 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $646e60 MANHOLE RINGS & COVERS Sll8•34 TRUCK PARTS $1f8e16 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES S58.67 SHALL HARDWARE S4?J.19 SHALL HARDWARE Sl~t.34 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES $275.02 ENGINE PARTS $1~.ao WATER USEAGE S34u.51 COMPRESSOR PARTS $9,725.11 CAUSTIC SODA !35,955.39 CHLORINE \~42e7~ VALVES I• Ir •. 1 I I I . J I .· ' :: to ~mo rw :: IJARR A!'IT NO. 071955 071956 071~57 071~·!-8 ti 071959 071960 :r> 071961 a'"> 071 %2 m r.71963 ~ 07196'4 ~ 071965 . 071966 ~ 071967 ~ H19t8 071969 071970 * 071971 00 0711172 '·• 071973 . . 071974 II> 071975 c: 071976 •, .. n11977 to 071978 ~ 071979 t.n 071980 t;:! 0719A1 p:: C71982 ~ Hl~~3 ~ 071%lf Vl G71~85 i. 071986 ;... 071987 '.11 ! 0715~8 li7t-::89 (•7J99Ci I 071~91 ·11· 07199?. G719~3 :'17 l ~~If 1)7 1 q55 0719S6 071q57 07199{.l 071999 onr-oo :: Oj I \.N :: 91q9 -JT DIST WO~KJNG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/26/84 PAG[ REPORT NUMBER AP43 (, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF O~ANGE COUNTY VENDOR ORCO BLOCK COet INC• COUNTY OF ORANGE o.c. E~PL. R£TJREHENT SYSTEM PACIFIC MOBIL£ OFFIC[S PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. FACJFIC BELL FAPAGON BUSINESS SYSTEMS NORMAN PARSO~S PARTS UNLI MITE£' PASCAL & LUDWIG POSTl1AST£R OUAKER SUPPLY CO THE REGISTER THE REGISTER REMARKABLE PPOOUCTSt INC THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY co. OF CALIF., REXNORD ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS REYNOLD ALUMINUM SUfPLY CO. rHCOH CORP ROSE'HOUNTo INC. JOSEPH T. RYERSON & SONt INC• SANCON INC. SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FO~MS SANO TIRES UNLIAITEO SANTA ANA DATSUN SANTA ~NA ELECT~IC MOTORS SANTA ANA·OFFICE SUPPLY COt SE Al BLACK SEARSt ROEBUCK ' CO. S.F. SfRRANTINO SH~HROCK SUPPLY S .. ITH-EHERY CO• SOUTH COAST OFFJC£ £QUJPH£NT SOUTHERN C~LJF. EDISON CO. SO. CAlo GP.S CO. SO. C~LIF. MATE~ CO• SOUTHERN COUNTllS Oil co. SPAR~LfTTS OPJNKING WATER ~PfCJAL12ED PRODUCTS COe STAINLESS rJPf & FJTTl~C CC. STINSON ELECTRIC ~r£CJALTY co. SUPfRJOR LJ~E g CHEMICAL CORP. 3? STAKE & BUJLOING SUPPLl~S s.b. THOM~s. JNC. TMOMPSON LACQUf ~ CO. CHANNON Co TJA CLAIMS PAID 1l/2A/84 3 ::: o:;, ( ( I ~FUND NO 9}QQ -JT DIST WOFKJNG C~PITAL PPOCESSJNG DATE 11/26/0q PAGE ~EPORT NUMBER AP43 .. ::: COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Cl~IHS P410 11128/84 ··~A~R UJT f\:Oe r.. VENCJOP -.MOUNT OESCPIPTTON I !..: h !"I i': m ~ ...b-· -t:r ~ ~ OQ i .. : lj ::; ~ l''• t:+J, ~ :::0. ~ n ...:..t U,) i' 1:.1 : I 1 .... !''" :11 ::: c:t I ..i::- . ::: 072Ct01 1)72002 072003 •1721104 072.:J05 0720rrt. 072C07 072()0R 07 2 (:0') 072CJ10 072Jll 072012 072013 072014 072015 072 016 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLYt INC. TUBE SALES U.S. AUTO GLASS; INC. UNJTro r•RCEL !ERVICE UNJTlD Sl~TES fQUJP~ENT Co., lNC. V"ll SCIENTIFIC VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. GEORGE Fe VEIT Mrs~AR MARINE fLCCTPONICS WESTINGHOUSf £LECTRJC CORP WHJTCt FINE & VERVILL£ WILSON FORU SALES ~OLDER [NGINEERJNGt INC THOMAS l• MOOORUFf 1 INC. JERO>r CORP i GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES TOT•L CLAIMS PAID 11/28/84 SUMMARY #I OPER FUND #1 ACO FUND #2 OPER FUND 12 ACO FUND 113 OPER FUND #3 ACO FUND 13 F/R FUND 115 OPER FUND #5 ACO FUND 16 ACO FUND 117 OPER FUND 117 ACO FUND 117 F/R FUND #11 OPER FUND #11 ACO FUND #11 F/R FUND. #13 ACO FUND #5&6 OPER FUND 116&7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED LAIBILITY CLAIMS JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 11/28/84 INSURANCE FUN~ it49.75 TRUCK PARTS S445.20 TUBING Sl23.no TRUCK REPAIRS S40e43 DELIVERY SERVICE S308e77 COMPRESSOR PARTS S1i166999 ---·-· -1-LAB -SUPPL I ES s2q5.97 PIPE SUPPLIES Sl,066.33 BUILDING MATERIALS $73e 90· · · ·· · -----LAB·-REPAIRS · Slt211e18 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES S899e10 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY .. ·-----s3 h 0 --···------·--·-·--l'RU6K .. PARTS----·· -· --·--·-· · ---.... ----·---·· Slt368.00 CONTRACTOR PW-122 S19t219e00 LEGAL SERVICES S13;279i55 ...... ·-·-··· ... _XEROX REPRODUeTION · ............ ----- $513.64 VALVES $1,411,044.19 ================= $_ AMOUNT __ ioo ~.oo ___ _ 1,357.20 501 • 51 3.1~9~08 13,761.23 8,449.61 9,QH.~3 5,825.88 751.32 8,784.4Q 3,658.03 2,843.71 77. 38 676.09 536.99 268,026.25 638.50 3,675.13 14.35 222,928.27 749,616.24 143.26 106,391.93 $1,411,044.19 ( . ·--· '1 ·1 ,, •. 1 " .'.:l ii 1:;1 !, .. , . ..!"·: J'..'! :·i ;_·1 1 1_.: .:! .•. I !::-! j"I :·:·1 i::: "lj ,.1. ,··: <;·:i ';·I f1.• 1 :·=l ' (1 !"'· 111 i .... ... - P. O. BOX 8127 -.10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-150 -------------~----~~~ C.O. NO.~_S_i_x_(_6~)--~~--~~~ ;NTRACTOR ~. Advance Constructors, Inc. 'DATE ________ N_ov_e_m_b_e_r __ 20~,.__1~9-84 _______ ~\,,J-- ~B: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY F°\CILIT:IES.AT PLANT NO. 2 "C" HEADWORKS, JOB NO. P2-25-2 .. Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (R~JUU~i) $ __ ~3~·-5~4~6 ........... 00--~-------.. Jn accordance with contract provisions, the following ~hanges ln the contr~ct d/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following di ti ons to or-deducti-ons from the contract price are hereby approved. Item A EPOXY COATING CURBS ON TWO ENGINE PADS, EW252-10 Contractor applied concrete adhesive before concrete curbs around engines Nos. 1 and 3 were poured and then applied an epoxy sealant arolDld the inside of the curbs and the engine pads to prevent water from leaking into the cold joint·between the old concrete and the new, and thus preventing rapid deterioration of the new work. This work was done for a firm price of $1,860.00. ADDED COSTS THIS CHAl'lGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item B ENGINE CONDENSATE LINES, AW252-4 Contractor altered the new 2" stainless steel condensate return lines at all six steam separators to provide a 12" water leg which is required to keep steam from backflowing into the overhead excess steam condensers and thus allow the plant to operate as planned. This work was done for a firm price of $1,686.00. ADDED "COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:· TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: t TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #9{A) -ALL DISTRICTS $1~860.00 • 0 Calendar Days $1,686.00 0 Cal.endar Days "$3,546.00 , 0 Calendar Days "C-1" P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLE~1 CALIFORNIA 92708 CHAf~GE ORDER GRANT NO. G--06-1 flZ:i-1 :;o C.O. NO. Six (6) '-'4TRACTOR: Advanco Const11lctors. Inc. DATE __ ~~--N_o~'~·c~m~b~c~r---.20 ___ .~1~9~8~4~- JOB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2 "C" HEADWORKS, JOB No; p2..:2s-2 The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within t·he time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this change order and no direct or. indirect, incidental or consequential costs· ·or expenses have been or will be incurred .by contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT.TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time O~iginal Completion Date Time· Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date. \._I I September 12, 1983 ~ 600 Calendar Days / · ?-Jay 3, 1985 / 0 Calendar Days" 3 Calendar Days_,-. 603 Calendar Daysi"' May 6, 1985 ;v Original Contract Price $ Prev. Auth. Changes $ This Change {ADO) (iiJU1tl) $ Amended Contract Price. $ Soard authorization date: December 12, 1984 Approved: 3,2107000.00 55,940.74 ~ 3 ! 546. 00""' 3,269,486. 7416-' ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, Ca 1 i.forn i a By~~--~--~~~~~~~~~~~- Dep u t y Chief Engineer ·. "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #9CA) -ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" .:.: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1 CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO.~N~/_A ______________ ~~ C .O. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: . PASCAL & LUDWIG ENGINEERS, INC. DA1E November 21, 1984 JOB:· ... PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS P AND Q AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-26 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (IXS.CU!«l) $ 4 ,610 .00 --~---------~~---....,.....- In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. The Contractor installed a new surface drain line and drain box to drain the area between the truck wash facility and the new paving on the east side of this contract. The work was add~d to this contract because the new drain line runs across the area to be paved on this contract and ties ~nto a new manhole on the Bushard Trunk also in- stalled on this contract. The costs to have added this drain line at a later date were felt to have been considerably higher as a result of the extra excavation and paving involved. TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: $4,610.00 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this change order can be perfonned incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, ~ mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Dat~ Notice to Proceed Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date September 16, 1983 December 14, 1983 365 Calendar Days December 14, 1984 o Calendar Days 0 Calendar Days No Change No Change Original Contract Price $ 2,174,300.00 --------------------Pre v. Auth. Changes $ 31,488.18 --------------------This Change (ADD) QD~ $ 4,610.00 --------------------- Amended Contract Price 2,210,398.18 Board authorization date: December 12, 1984 Approved: "D" Contractor COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS Deputy Chief Engineer "D" .: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO • ..._;..C~/A_.__~~~~~~~~ C.O. NO. ___ o~n~e_.._Cl_) ______________ __ CONTRACTOR!:. ALLEN ELECTRIC CO. JOB: pH AND CONDUCTIVITY METERS, JOB. NO. PW-118 Amount of this Change Order (ADD} (~ $ 1. 292. 00 .. Jn accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item A -Add Pull Box and Wires for New Transformers Contractor installed a new electrical pull box and pulled new wires from the "C" Headworks MCC to feed new transformer "CA" in "C" Headworks meter vault "CA" because existing feed wires were too short to connect to the new work as planned. The work was done on a force account and totalled $495.00. TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: '-""'OTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item B -Re-Feed Existing Convenience Outlet Contractor installed conduit and wire to relocate an existing convenience outlet outside ~'C" Headworks meter vault "CA" to suit changes made to the existing facility by others. The work was done on a force account and totalled $283.00. TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item C -Increase Wire Sizes Between Panels "CA" and "CB" Contractor installed #8 wire with a #10 bond instead of #12 wire as called for on the plans in order to safely carry the loads in the new meter vaults. The work was done on a force account and totalled $514.00. TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ~oTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: '.,.! TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: $495.00 0 Calendar Days $283.00 0 Calendar Days $514.00 0 Calendar Days .$1,292.00 : :a.Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) Cl) -·ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO.___;N~/~A-=----~~~~~'-6) C.O. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: ALLEN ELECTRIC CO. DA TE November 19, 1984 J·OB: pH AND CONDUCTIVITY METERS, JOB NO. PW-118 The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the.time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Original May 29, 1984 90 Calendar Days August 26, 1984 0 Calendar Days 0 Calendar Days No Change No Change Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) (~ Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: December 12, 1984 Approved: $ $ $ $ 53,400.00 0.00 1, 292. 00 542692.00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California Contractor "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9Cc)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-198 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-118 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RF.SOLUTION OF TSE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,.5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COONTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PB AND OONDtJCTIVITY METERS FOR •c• BEADWORKS INFLUENT TRtJNKS, JOB NO. PW-118, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY R!SOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Allen Electric Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for pH and Conductivity Meters for •c• Beadworks Influent Trunks, Job No. PW-118, on August 26, 19841 and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the '.._,! contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered f iled1 and, Section 3. That pB and Conductivity Meters for •c• Beadworks Influent Trunks, Job No. PW-118, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated May 29, 19841 and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor1 and, Section s. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Allen Electric Company, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of pB and Conductivity Meters for •c• Beadworks Influent Trunks, Job No. PW-118, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel1 and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized ~ and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 12, 1984. "F" AGENDA ITEM #9(c)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "F" RESOLUTION NO. 84-199 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE JOBS NOS. Pl-21, P2-28-2 AND P2-28-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT BELT FILTER PRESSES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-21, AND AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-28-l, AND VENTILATION IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2 SOLIDS HANDLING FACILITIES, JOB NO. P2-28-2, PROVIDING FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DESIGN OF JOB NO. Pl-21 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for engineering services in connection with design of Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-217 Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28-11 and Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling Facilities, Job No. P2-28-21 and, WHEREAS, because of the delay in receiving the results of the odor study being conducted by the Districts' consult~nt, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., John Carollo Engineers could not complete the design work on Job No. Pl-21 within the six month period allotted in the agreement1 and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with John Carollo Engineers to provide for an extension of time for completion of the design of Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-21. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated , to that certain ~~~~~~~ agreement dated June 13, 1984, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, ~ on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, and John Carollo Engineers, for design of Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-211 Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28-11 and Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling Facilities, Job No. P2-28-2, providing for an extension of time for completion of design of Job No. Pl-21 from December 14, 1984 through February 14, 1985, is hereby approved and accepted1 and, Section 2. That said a~ditional engineering services re design of Job No. Pl-21 shall be in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, with no increase in the total maximum amount authorized for design of the three projects of $720,500.001 and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for '-"'itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, s, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. . PASSED ~D ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 12, 1984. "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-200 AWARDING PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR SUPPLYING CHLORINE IN ONE TON CYLINDERS, SPECIFICATION NO. C-016 A JOINT RFSOLtJTION OF. THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SUPPLYING CHLORINE IN ONE TON CYLINDERS, SPECIFICATION NO. C-016 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Chief of Procurement and Property that award of contract be made to Jones Chemical, Inc., for Supplying Chlorine in One Ton Cylinders, Specification No. C-016, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered f iledJ and, Section 2. That the contract for Supplying Chlorine in One Ton Cylinders, Specification No. C-016, be awarded to Jones Chemical, Inc. in the amount of $169.00 per ton in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel1 and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND AIX>P'l'ED at a regular meeting held December 12, 1984. "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9CF) -ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" .: "H-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVF.NUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714) 540-2910 November 21; 1984 l714) 962-2411 MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Butler SUBJECT: Bid Specificaton No. C-016 Supplying Chlorine in One Ton Cylinders- Sealed bids were opened on November 20, 1984, furnishing and delivering Chlorine in one ton cylinders.for a period of one year beginning January 14, 1984. Tabulation of bids are as follows: Company Price Per Ton 1. Jones Chemicals, Inc. $169.00 Torrance 2. Continental Chemical Co. 183.50 Anaheim 3. All Pure Chemical Co. 199.00 Fontana 4. McKesson Chemical Co. No-Bid Tustin The estimated annual quantity of chlorine usage in one ton cylinders based on present usage is 730 tons. Chlorine prices have increased as we experienced in the Bulk Chlorine Bid in September, 1984. Tpe low bid price· is approximately 17% higher than the existing contract. It is recommended that the award be made to Jones Chemicals, Inc., for their low bid amount of $169.00 per ton. Based on the estimated usage, the annual cost will be approximately $123,370.00 plus sales tax. There is a provision in the speci- fica ·ans for a one year contract extension. of Procurement & Property TH/re AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-202-2 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 42 -RAMSAMOOJ ANNEXATION) A RESOLUTION OF TBE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUN'l'Y, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 42 -RAMSAMOOJ ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOFS HEREBY RFSOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 2 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That pursuant· to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 2 by Dindial Ramsamooj, the owner of said property to be annexed, by means of Resolution No. 80-142-2, filed with said Commission by the District1 and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by saiq Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is •Annexation No. 42 -Ramsamooj Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2•, the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit •A• and shown on Exhibit •s• attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution1 and, Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited1 and, Section s. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That payment of annexation acreage fees in the amount of $710.60 "l-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 2 "I-1" .: has been received7 and, "'-" Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99{h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its a~ valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies7 and · Section a. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 2 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 12, 1984. "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) -DISTRICT 2 "1-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE. FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1 CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO·; N/ A ~------~~~--~~~~- c. 0. NO. One ( 1) CONTRACTOR: John T. Malloy and John T. Malloy, Inc., DA1E November 21, 1984 . v. JOB: SLiDE GATE-INSTALLATION, "A" AND "8" TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-21-lRl Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0 .00 ----~--~--~~~-- In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. The contractor experienced delays beyond his control as a result of the delivery time required for the five gates on this project. The Districts hereby extends the c~ntract by 37 calendar days. TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 37 Calendar Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME· Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date May 29, 1984 120 Calendar Days September 25, 1984 37 Calendar Days 37 Calendar Days 157 Calendar Days November 1, 1984 The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental _ to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract plus the 37 days time extension granted hereby. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension other than the 37 days approved herein is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by contractor. Origina) Contract Price $ 51,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 0.00 Amended Contract Price $ 51,000.00 Board authorization date: December 12, 1984 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Orange County, California Contractor Deputy Chief Engineer II J" AGENDA ITEM #9(L)(l) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 II J" RESOLtJ'l'ION NO. 84-203 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-21-lRl AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLU'l'ION OF ~ BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SLIDE GATE INSTALLATION, "A" AND "B" 'l'RtJNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-21-lRl, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE 1 DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, John T. Malloy & John T. Malloy, Inc., a Joint Venture, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Slide Gate Installation, •A• and "B" Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-21-lRl, on November 1, 1984; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended ~acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered f iled7 and, Section 3. That Slide Gate Installation, 9 A" and "B" Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-21-lRl, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of .the contract therefor, dated May 29, 1984; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section s. That the Final Closeout Agreement with John T. Malloy & John T. Malloy, Inc., a Joint Venture, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Slide Gate Installation, "A" and "B" Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-21-lRl, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, "...,,I Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. S, acting for "K-1" . AGENDA ITEM #9(L)(2) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "K-1" • 1 itself and on behalf of District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 12, 1984. "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(L)(2) -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "K-2" RESOLO'l'ION NO. 84-204-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 92 -GOZMAN ANNEXATION) A RESOLO'l'ION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 92 -GOZMAN ANNEXATION TO OlUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOFS HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has ~ -heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 7 by Louis Guzman, ·the owner of said property to be annexed, by means of Resolution No. 80-93-7, filed with said Commission by the District1 and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by sai~ Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is •Annexation No. 92 -Guzman Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 1•, the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit •A• and shown on Exhibit •s• attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution1 and, Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited1 and, Section s. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory1 and, Section 6. That payment of annexation acreage fees in the amount of $1,325.00 "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(M) -DISTRICT 7 "L-1" . ) has been receivedJ and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agenciesi and Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 12, 1984. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(M) -DISTRICT 7 "L-2,, Date: ~'O: PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. / P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 I (We), the undersigned landowner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex \ · C>-i acres (Gross -to pearest hu~d~edth) o; terri~ory to \ the District located in the vicinitY, of ) "'\ l-{) )J ( '-... t l ( ·,._" \ · S r { ;. I I'\. . -T . t ·-' , • . . ~ ~ ., f"'\ ' ' l -. I \ ., "\ ' 1 ' • • ' ., I ' .... I , Said property is v 1 Inhabited I Uninhabited: Number of' registered voters, if any: • The assessed value of the property is: $ r"7 a / I"" o (' J I'.) o Also enclosed are the JUSTI"FICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE required by-the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of $ S:o Q representing payment of the '--):STRICT PROCESSING FEE. DISTRICT 7 ONLY: The property must also be annexed to the __ 7th or 70th Sewer Maintenance District, the local sewering agency for the proposed development. Accordingly, enclosed herewith are the legal description and map for annexation to the (7th or 10th) Sewer Maintenance District. Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: __ k_ ..... __ £;;,.... _\ ___ \-~_,_-___ J_.-_\ l ....... ~ ...... ·t--.......,.,,~J /) v, -L.' ,,. .. . \ ~ )r) t "-z l, , __.;:;...,) ....i.r_· -:.....-i::.,_, ___ -----~~·'\ ...... ;~.': __ ;:-_, -J '" ll . ______ ....:o;;:o.....,;,:.;...· ....;,i.....-::.,~' --d L"·\,· ./' ,-, l; . __ __-.r_. ..... · _-._....~....... .......: ....__ _ ___..{_..,;.....,.\_...~......,_.) '...-.· .. ... . . -'l J I t 4 ( l . • , • ( & l , t\ /. l t 1 Tele: ·-, 1 , / i 1 , . 1 .. Tele : ____ 1----+1 ..... 1. ..... , --'~/:--·.._, / V ~ > "l Lt" \.: :, .> -i.1 2 l ~ 1i t .. ~vt7 SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER x \ L -\~\/Vtrt· u \ \ --~~.._.... ..... 9' n ? 2-\ . ~-~-" & \ tt u _ __.:,.Q~t$=~0--7l"~t.-l2~ ... __ ( ___ t;..----=\ . ...___..q z, Ct f> r ,: <; ' ~ o v-' "' f-f!-i (d Name (Typed or printed) ) ,, \ \ ._ . ·1 (__ . , . '. '. \. L \., r. • ~ k::.~~ n La':\ I h. ~;~ i) Name (TYPed or printea) . I t / ' 2 I <; f" __ ....;;.~~...;..--"::;..._.;...<,-_9 _l;........ __ ~/ ..... \_. ~' _ .. ~.;_, ~-~'._7 _1....;-""...;."-l!' I I ' . ' j c ) ". I. -, -~ • { .• ' ,. /.T 1 I / 'i .) • 1..'V I "M" AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICT 7 "M" RESOLUTION NO. 84-205-7 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS RE ANNEXATION NO. 121 -BURRIA ANNEXATION A RFSOLOTION OF THE BOABD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, At1.rBORIZING THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 121 - BtJRRIA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RFSOLVE DETERMINE AND ORDER: .. That an application for annexation of territory to itself be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows: Section 1. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of CaliforniaJ and, V Section 2G That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately 1.07 acres located in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Acre Place in the city of Orange, to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as requested by Drs. Kesho and Kamla Hurria, owners of said property, and, Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited1 and, Section 4. That the designation assigned to the territory proposed to be annexed is •Annexation No. 121 -Burria Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 1•, the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibits •A• and •a•, attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution1 and, Section S. That provisions for all fees required to be paid as a condition of '\._) "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRlCT 7 "N-1" the annexation must be satisfied prior to completion of annexation proceedings7 and, ·...._,; Section 6. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies1 and, Section 7. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as required by law be taken to complete this annexation • . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 12, 1984. "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(N) -DISTRICT 7 "N-2" "0" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE CEUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Boards of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 November 28, 1984 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of pro- fessional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated TELEPHCN ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 the following fee with Boyle Engineering Corp. in conjunction with surveying services during construction for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, on a per diem basis, including profit and overhead, in an amount not to exceed $41,~64 at the following hourly rates: 3 Man Survey Party 2 Man Survey Party Licensed Surveyor $135/hour $103/hour $ SS/hour TOTAL CONTRACT, NOT TO EXCEED $ 41,064 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/ Don E. Smith Don E. Smith, Chairman Selection Committee /s/ Thomas M. Dawes /s/ Evelyn Hart Evelyn Hart, Vice Chairman Selection Committee Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer Selection Committee AGENDA ITEM #9(Q)(l) -DISTRICT 7 "0" RESOLUTION NO. 84-206-7 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION RE CONTRACT NO. 7-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR DESIGN OF THE VON KARMAN TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-8, PROVIDING FOR SURVEYING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the District has heretofore entered into an agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for engineering services in connection with design of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide for surveying services during the construction phase of the project; and, "-'1 WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on August 8, 1984, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services, in accordance with established procedures~ NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation.District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 3 dated to that certain -------- agreement dated April 13, 1983, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and Boyle Engineering Corporation, for design of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, providing for surveying services required during construction of said project, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be amended to increase the compensation, on a per diem basis, including profit and overhead, by an amount '...,_! "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g)(2) -DISTRICT 7 "P-1" not to exceed $41,064.00, increasing the total maximum compensation from $194,230.00 to an amount not to exceed $235,294.00, as follows: Original Agreement Addendum 1 Addendum 2 Addendum 3 · Engineering services at hourly rates, not to exceed $108,843.00 Outside services at hourly rates, for: -Aerial topographic services, not to exceed -Soils investiga- tion, not to exceed Dual Track Design and Redesign for inclusion of IRWD capacity (total amount to be reimbursed by IRWD) Surveying Services: 3-Man Survey Party ($135/hour) ·2-Man Survey Party ($103/hour) Licensed Surveyor ($ SS/hour) 4,000.00 9,200.00 $22,187.00 900.00 13,900.00 20,200.00 $15,000.00 $41,064.00 AGREEMENT TOTAL $131,030.00 4,900.00 23,100.00 35,200.00 41,064.00 TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED ••••••••••••••••••••• $235,294.00 Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 3 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 12, 1984. "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(Q)(2)-DISTRICT 7 "P-2" "Q" November 19, 1984 Mr. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Von Karman Trunk Sewer Dear Mr. Sylvester: This letter is to confirm that the Irvine Ranch Water District desires to participate in the construction of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer by paying the dtfference in costs between Schedule A and Schedule B. We understand the difference of cost on the bidding schedules was $867,696. Schedule A will provide capacity in certain reaches of the Trunk Sewer for delivery of sewage from the proposed District No. 14. Reference js made to my letters of November 14th on the subject of the formation of District No. 14 and November 14th on this subject, wherein it was requested that the award of construction contract on Schedule A be dependent upon the acceptance by your Board of Directors of the concepts· foe 1 uded in the former 1 etter. The act ion taken by your Board of Directors on Novern5er 14th was satisfactory. ~Je appreciate your continuing cooperation to negotiate an acceptable change order which would delete the portions of the oversizing on the Von Karman Avenue leg of the project. Yours sincerely, . /.-/ . ,,,·... / / ,, ~ ~-·· . . -..> ·I/." 7/.". / / 4'. / ""· ,,~ _,,,. ~ (_. ~ ·""' • . . .-1 ..... -· • -•. , ·z .• - A. E. Bruington ./ ~ General Manager AGENDA ITEM #l3(c) -DISTRICT 7 "Q" "R-1" 13772 Ranger Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92545 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10944 Ellis Avenue ·Fountain Valley,CA 32729-9127 Dear Honorable Board Members: Thank you for the opcortunity to address the board regarding the proposed plan for disposing treated · Stringfellow waste water off the coasts of Huntingto~ a~d Newport Beach. I would also like to thank all the representatives fro~ the respective agencies involved with this plan for their ef:f"orts in providing me with information about the project. All th·.: representatives have b-:-en extremely conscientous about answering questions, returning telephone calls, and providing written information about the proposal. After reviewing the material regarding the prooosed plan, after speaking with many officials from the agencies involved with the project, and after speaking with many individuals involved in toxic waste disDosal from a lay persnective, it appears that the prooosed oroject has be~n well-planned, with substantial input from consulting firms outside the state and federal agencies. It also apoears that many of the problems that may be encountered with the magnitude of Stringfellow-a toxic waste have been anticipated by the agencies involved in the project. However, the plan, as many officials admit, is far from perfect. It still involves the trucking of treated solid waste to the Santa Barbar~ Class I dumDing facility, the trucking of treated liquid waste to the Santa Ana interceptor, the addition of Stringfellow-a heavy metals and toxic organics to the industrial waste and sewage already being piped-five miles off the coasts of Huntington and Newport Beach, and ·the trucking of contaminated charcoal to Kentucky for thermal destruction. (The trucking to Kentucky is a much more acceptable alternative than burning it at the Stringfellow site.) In addition to these imperfections in the plan, another potential problem may be encountered with construction of the AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "R-1" "R-2" prooosed facility at Stringfellow, which is designed to primarily treat the contaminated groundwater. With the construction cf this facility and with the success of the Stringfellow plan comes the inevitable fear that this facility may be used for future toxic waste management. Because of this potential, many residents of Huntington and Newport Beach fear that Orange County could become the . capital of toxic waste management in southern California. This fear, however, has been ameliorated by the Governor·s signing of Senate Bill 346, which designates the facility·s use only for Stringfellow waste. But, we all kno~ that legislation is not forever; this Senate Bill could. as other Senate Bills, face an untimely death in a climate of strong economic incentive and lobbying against it. Another potential problem is that of the latency ef:ect of the toxic organic substances that are being piped through the brine line a~d dumped into the Pacific. These organics, while being diluted by billions of gallons of seawater, may still carry a latent toxic potential that may not surface for decades. As in the case of DDT, which was dumped into the ocean in what was assumed to be safe amounts, the chemical aoparently was unexpectedly affected by the varying concentrations of salinity and varying amounts of marine life in the ocean. Because of these normal but variable conditions in the ocean, the chemical concentrated in amounts unforeseen by the experts, causing a toxic effect in marine life that was particularly devastating to the brown oelican. This toxic effect, however, did not surface for 40 years after the dumping of DDT. Even after considering the environmental impact of these notential problems, th~ experts still agree that this plan a~oears to be the most expeditious, cost-effective, and le3st likely to initiate another Stringfellow disaster at a different landfill site. It also apDears to be a plan that provokes the least environmental insult to the Orange County area while protecting the groundwater from a daily movement of contaminated liquids. There is still one question that continues to elude me: Why have the citizens of Huntington and Newport Beach been so thoroughly uninformed about this plan? During the past two weeks, I have spoken to more than 50 concerned citizens in the Huntington/NeWl)ort area, and not one individual knew of the proposed plan. 3iven the emotional impact of the toxic waste at Stringfellow, I would AGENDA ITEM #14CA) -DISTRICT 7 "R-2" "R-3" have susDected that the EPA and other involved agencies would have worked overtime to inform all the communities involved with such a project. But it appears that the educational and public relations efforts have been totally directed toward Glen Avon and Riverside citizens with no apparent attempts to inform the citizens on the coast. I first learned of the proposed plan from a news article written in the Register on October 30, 1334 --two weeks before the board was expected to approve the plan. After discussing the lack of public notice with the Sanitation district, I learned that a public notice of the prooosed meeting was published sometime in May, in the Riverside area. These attempts have been both feeble and inadequate in reaching the citizens along the coast. Because of inadequate public notice and lack of publi~ information about the plan, several citizens (who are unable to attend tonight•s meeting) have asked that I reoresent their wishes by asking for an extension of tonight·s decision until more citizens have had an opportunity to become informed and express their concerns. If the Board decides that this request translates into ar. unnecessary delay that might jeopardize a speedy cleanup of Stringfellow, I would suggest that the EPA and other involved agencies launch a public education campaign for the residents of Huntington and Newport Beach to ensure th·at the implementation of ·this project is no longer shrouded from the coastal residents. Because of the emotional charge associated with toxic waste in gener~l and with Stringfellow in oarticular, I would further suggest that ·the involved agencies make every reasonable eff or to keep the coastal residents as informed as the residents of Glen Avon. Thank you for allowing me an opportunity to express the concerns of the citizens of Fountain Valley, Huntington and Newport Beach. Sincerely, '""tWt l1~C1\~~ Bettie Lilley Nosek · AGENDA ITEM #14(A) -DISTRICT 7 ~ .. "R-3" ~ . -·-· -. . .... ~ ... City o-f Hl.IIl.tin.gton. Beach MAYOR Jack Kelly MAYOR PRO TEMPORE John Thomas '~ ···~·: P.O. BOX 190 • 2000 MAIN STREET • CALIFORNIA 92648 COUNCILMEMBERS Ruth s. Bailey Ruth Finley "S-1" -...•. --~· ~·-.;:._..,,,,!.../ November 21, 1984 Mr. Richard Edgar Joint Chairman o.c. Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92709 Dear Mr~~ Don MacAlllster Robert P. Mandie. Jr. Ron Pattinson -: Enclosed is a resolution adopted by the City of Huntington Beach on November 19, 1984, requesting the Orange County Sanitation District to reconsider its action in approving the discharge of preheated ground water from the Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Disposal Site into the Pacific Ocean at Huntington Beach. Our Council feels that a complete environ- mental impact report should be prepared so that the ful~ impacts may be assessed, alternatives developed and public input taken. We are opposed to any discharge of water which may impact the residents of Huntington Beach with unknown effects. We strongly urge the Orange County Sanitation District to request the pre- paration of an EIR before any discharge of groundwater from Stringfellow can take place. District #11 cc: City Council City Administrator Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Enclosure AGENDA ITEM #14(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "S-1". b RESOLUTION NO. 5465 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUESTING THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT TO RECONSIDER ITS ACTION IN APPROVING THE DISCHARGE OF PRETREATED GROUND WATER FROM THE STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE DIS- POSAL SITE INTO THE PACIFIC OCEAN AT HUNTINGTON BEACH ;. .. WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District has approved a request of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority to issue a permit to the California Department of Health Services for dis- charge of pretreated ground water from the Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Disposal Site; and The pretreated ground water would be discharged.into the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Huntington Beach; and The State of California exempted the "emergency" cleanup and ~ treatment of Stringfellow wastewater from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that it does strongly urge the Orange County Sanitation District to reconsider its vote to allow the pretreated ground water from Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Disposal Site to be discharged into the Pacific Ocean off the coast of this city. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the California Department of Health Services be requested to prepare a complete environmental impact report for that portion of its proposed Stringfellow clean- up projec~ which affects Orange County so that alternatives may be developed and discussed, and the residents of Orange County are given an opportunity to express their concern. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send copies of this reso- lution to the Orange County Sanitation District, and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. ~ s1 "S. 2" 19/84 -.. AGENDA ITEM #14(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "S-2" t. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of 1e City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on ......, the 19th day of November, 1984. ATTEST: APPROVED FORM: ~~J~ City Clerk 2. ,-3" AGENDA ITEM #14Ca) -ALL DISTRICTS "S-3" "S-4" Res. No. 5465 S~ATE OF CALJFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as: CITY OF HUNrINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopt~d by the af·firmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of November , 19 84 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: MacAllister, Thomas, Kelly, Finley, Bailey, Mandie NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Pattj.nson City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California The foregcing instrument is a correct copy of the original on file in this office .. Attest II· ~ ._. 19 f'~ ~l:ICIA M. WENTWORTH City Cls! k :i~d Ex·officio Clerk of the City Council of the City cf Huntington Beach, California. ' • By Q,.-~ Deputy AGENDA ITEM #14(s) -ALL DISTl«crs "S-4" .. . coum SANITATION DISTRICTS ROS. 1, ~' 3, 5, 6, 7 AID 11 OF ORAICE coum, CIUFOINIA . MINUTES OF THE REGUUR MEETING. 011 · NOVEMBER 14, 1984 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 EJ,T.JS A VENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on November 14, 1984, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and inv~cation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2,"-"' S, 6, 7 and 11 as follows: DISTRICT NO. 1: ~;£STRICT NO. 2: -. .. DISTRICT NO. 3: DISTRICT NO. 5: g!STRICT NO. 6: -'• DISTRICT NO. 7: "-" DISTRICT NO. 11: ACTIVE DIBECTOBS x Robert Hanson, Chairman x Dan Griset, Chairman pro tem _!__Don Saltarelli _!__Roger Stanton _!__Henry Wedaa, Chairman a Don Roth, Chairman pro tem ~Richard Buck X-Buck Catlin X-sam Cooper X-Dan Griset X-Jobn Holmberg X-carol Kawanami x James Neal x Bob Perry x Don Smith _!__Roger Stanton a Don Roth, Chairman x Carrey Nelson x Oscar Brownell X-Buck Catlin x Norman Culver x Henry Frese X-non Griffin X-Dan Griset x John Holmberg x James Neal X-Richard Olson x Richard Partin x ;Roger Stanton x Charles Sylvia x John A. Thomas a Martha Weishaupt x Evelyn Bart, Chairman x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem _!__Roger Stanton x James Wahner, Chairman x Evelyn Bart, Chairman pro tem _!__Roger Stanton x Don Smith, Chairman x Evelyn Bart, Chairman pro tem x Richard Bdgar X-Dan Griset x David Sills x Roger Stanton x James Wahner x Ruth Bailey, Chairman x Ron Pattinson _!._Roger Stanton -2- ALTERNATE DIRECTOBS _orma Crank ____ Robert Luxembourger _orsula Kennedy ____ Harriett Wieder ____ Todd Murphy E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. -----Arthur Newton Chris Norby _____ carrey Nelson Robert Luxembourger Bill Mahoney William Odlum Marvin P. Adler _Norman Culver _____ Gene Beyer _____ Harriett Wieder _H. Llewellyn Overholt _____ sam Cooper _Joyce Risner _Chris Norby _Bob Perry Norma Seidel Jesse Davis Robert Luxembourger -----Bill Mahoney -Marvin P. Adler -Bruce Finlayson -Gerald Mullen -----Harriett Wieder ----David Lander -----Robert P. Mandie, Jr. Jean Siriani Philip Maurer ----Jacqueline Heather Harriett Wieder Steven Smith -----Philip Maurer Harriett Wieder Gene Beyer ----Philip Maurer Ursula Kennedy Robert Lwcembourger -Sally Anne Miller Harriett Wieder _Barry Green Don MacAllister -Robert Mandie Harriett Wieder 11/14/84 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Blake Anderson, Gary Streed, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Ray Young, Richard von Langen, Chuck Winsor, Bob Ooten, U Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Suzanne Atkins, Harvey Bunt, Milo Keith, Bill Knopf, · Mrs. Richard B. Edgar, Barry s. Surman, Tom Krattenmaker, Gloria Jordan, Jerry A. Jordan, James w. Anderson, Susan M. Trager, Kay Cooperman, Conrad Bohener, Ray E. Lewis, Bill B. Dendy, J. Andrew Schlange, Sat Tamaribuchi, Art Bruington, Ron Young, Peer Swan, Daryl Miller, Btll Vardoulis, Barbara Brown, Dwain Albright, Dave Lopez, Ron Deaton * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 3 Receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Buena Park re Board Appointment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the minute excerpt from the City of Buena Park re appointment of alternate Director, and seating a new member of the Board, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows (*Mayor): Active Dire.ctor Alternate Director Don R. Griff in James T. Jarrell* DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meetings held October 10, 1984 and November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be-deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -3- • • 11/14/84 DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Aeproval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. "-1.I DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman Chairman Edgar reported on the California Association of Sanitation Agencies' Conference (CASA) held in Newport Beach, on November 9 and 10 which he and Directors Bob Hanson, Evelyn Bart, Don Smith and Jim Wahner attended along with General Manager and General Counsel. Mr. Edgar announced that a request had been received from Director Cooper for consideration of adoption of a smoking policy for the Board Meeting Room and recognized Mr. Cooper who addressed the Boards. The matter was referred to the Executive Committee for study and report back to the Joint Boards. The Joint Chairman then called at meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, November 28th at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Oscar Brownell and Buck Catlin to attend and participate in the discussions. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager The General Manager reported that approval of the Districts' 30l(h) Waiver/NPDES Permit was still pending at EPA's headquarters in Washington, D.C. Mr. Sylvester advised that notices had been published in The Times, The Register and The Daily Pilot to satisfy the Environmental Protection Agency's regulations requiring those agencies that receive a portion of their revenue through ad valorem taxes to provide notice annually to every property owner as to what portion of their ad valorem tax is used for sewerage services. Originally, EPA had taken a position that agencies such as the Districts would have to provide this notice by a direct mailing to every property owner. The General Manager added that through a state-wide subcommittee which he chaired, they had convinced the EPA that this requirement could be accomplished by publication of a notice in a newspaper in each District, which will save the Districts an estimated $250,000 for the first year and $150,000 annually thereafter. The General Manager briefly reported on an agenda item approving a negotiated interim, short-term agreement with Falcon Disposal Services for disposal of solids residuals from the treatment plants. Be advised that Falcon Services is a subsidiary of BKK Corporation and they had requested that the Districts' change their name when considering approval of this agreement from Falcon Disposal Services to BKK Corporation. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly reported on Repgrt of the General Counsel the status of formation of proposed District No. 13. The Local Agency Formation Commission has conducted a public hearing on the Districts' proposal and ~ has approved said formation. The matter is now scheduled to be heard by the Orange County Board of Supervisors and if approved, would become effective around the first of the.year. -4- 11/14/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A", "B•, nc•, "D" and "E", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. · DIST 1 ONLY DIST 1 ONLY If 9/05/84 9ll9l84 10l03l84 l0ll7l84 10l3ll84 · ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund -$ 406,780.81 $292,381.34 $ 458,541.88 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 660,191.67 233,308.99 676,897.98 Joint Working Capital Funds 53,699.11 63,617.08 48,532.40 Self-Funded Insurance Punds 2,991.78 S,881.58 2,333.43 DISTRICT NO. 1 $ 2,942.66 $ 9,206.48 14,323.93 170.00 13,913.26 DISTRICT NO. 2 1,228.62 6,512.94 19,815.08 DISTRICT NO. 3 139,245.99 10,557.06 53,760.55 DISTRICT NO. s 1,256.59 6,997.51 8,479.33 DISTRICT NO. 6 29.76 52.80 22,649.24 DISTRICT NO. 7 33,391.84 7,136.16 5,448.77 DISTRICT NO. 11 22,095.14 S,411.02 1,671.18 DISTRICTS NOS. S & 6 JOINT 1,423.65 46,887.84 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT 84.74 390.00 --·I 2,942.66 ! 9,206.48 !1,336,743.63 $632,416.48 91.8~,-) $1,359,022.74 ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re Job No. I-2R-2 and Job No. I-2R-3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and ·specif !cations for Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Adams Avenue to Hamilton Avenue, Job No. I-2R-2, and Phase III, Hamilton Avenue to •c• Beadworks at Plant No. 2, Job No. I-2R-3, authorizing an addition of $4,280.00 to the contract with Sancon Engineering, Inc. for additional costs of noving workers and equipment on and off site during removal of rock and debris from the pipe and removal of deteriorated reinforcing steel between two manholes, and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of the additional work required, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Jobs Nos. I-2R-2 and I-2R-3 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-181, accepting Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Adams Avenue to Hamilton Avenue, Job No. I-2R-2, and Phase III, Hamilton Avenue to •c• Beadworks at Plant No. 2, Job No. I-2R-3, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Pinal Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -s- . .,. 11/14/84 ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Job No. PW-083 (Rebid) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Auto Shop Hoist at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-083 (Rebid), authorizing an addition of $500.00 to the contract with Jepson Division/Charles E. Thompson Company, to relocate the control station for the auto shop hoist to alleviate a potential safety hazard, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Job No. PW-097 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. PW-097, Refurbish Effluent Junction Boxes at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2, granting a time extension of 12 calendar days to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. due to delays required by the Districts in order to avoid shutting down plant operations, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Accepting Job No. PW-097 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-183, accepting Job No. PW-097, Refurbish Effluent Junction Boxes at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specification re ~ Job No. PW-122 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Cooling Water Reuse at Foster Pump Station, Job No. PW-122, authorizing an addition of $1,520.00 to the contract with Wolder Engineering, Inc. to remove an undisclosed concrete encasement and granting a time extension of 2 calendar days due to delays required by the Districts in order to avoid shutting down plant operations, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-122 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-184, accepting Cooling Water Reuse at Foster Pump Station, Job No. PW-122, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications re Job No. P2-25-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. S to the plans and specifications for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, authorizing an addition of $5,011.06 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for four miscellaneous items of additional work and substitution of fiberglass grating for aluminum grating, and granting a time extension of 1 calendar day for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -6- 11/14/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and Job No. P2-26 specifications for Primary Sedimentation Basins P & Q at Plant No. 2, Job \../ No. P2-26, authorizing an addition of $12,414.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for paving and electrical changes at the main entrance of Plant No. 21 to provide power and control wiring for the chlorine spray system, filter-drive motor1 and installation of a three-valve bypass to the filter piping, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Job No. I-2R-2A Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Supplemental Repair No. I-2R-2A, Edison line, of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job transmitting information relative to the existence of a 12,000 volt be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Job No. I-2R-2A to Thibodo Construction Company, Inc. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Direct9rs hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-185, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, to Thibodo Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $220,000.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-119 specifications for Paving and Drainage at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, making miscellaneous clarifications1 specifying that a11· PVC piping shall be Schedule 801 and transmitting revised pages re the Schedule of Prices, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specif ioations re Job No. PW-119 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Paving and Drainage at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, making miscellaneous clarifications relative to the irrigation valve and requiring that soil amendment for landscaping be applied to a 20-foot wide strip along the fence line, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Job No. PW-119 to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-188, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Paving and Drainage at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, in the amount of $142,771.80. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -7- 11/14/84 ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Job No. PW-129 to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-187, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, in the amount of $24,071.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Job No. P2-28-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling, Job No. P2-28-2, notifying bidders of the date and time for a prebid conference, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Job No. P2-28-2 to Dean Chilton Construction Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-188, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling, Job No. P2-28-2, to Dean Chilton Construction in the amount of $384,900.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Ratifying action of the General Manager in issuing Change Order B "-"' to Purchase Order No. 17054 to Larry Walker Associates, Inc. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the action of the General Manager in issuing Change Order B to Purchase Order No. 17054 to Larry Walker Associates, Inc., increasing the total amount, on a per diem fee basis, from $10,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $32,000.00 for additional services required to assist in the preparation of a Request for Reconsideration of the eligibility of a $2.3 million claim settlement relative to the Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-6, and other previously-disallowed items, to be filed with the State water Resources Control Board and Environmental Protection Agency/Corps of Engineers, be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order to Transamerica Delaval (Specification No. E-158) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Transamerica Delaval in the amount of $37,200.00 plus tax, for Two (2) Turbochargers for the 1500 hp Delaval Enterprise Engines at Plant No. 1 (Specification No. E-158), used to drive air blowers for the activated sludge process. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order to Eimco Process Equipnent Company ~ _.(S;;;;o.ipelimiiiooic ... i ... f_.i .... ca ..... t._i....,o __ n.._N ..... o_. __ E_-_1_s_g >----- Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Eimco Process Equipment Company in the amount of $17,792.00 plus tax for Two (2) Rotary Distributor Precision Bearings and Appurtenances for the Plant No. 1 Trickling Filters (Specification No. E-159). -8- 11/14/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase contract for Supplying Ferric Chloride, That the bid tabulation and Specification No. P-067, to recommendation to award purchase order Imperial West Chemical contract for Supplying Ferric Chloride, \,./ Specification No. P-067, for backup odor control system and Phase III physical/chemical treatment study, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed7 and, FURTHER K>VED: That said purchase be awarded to Imperial West Chemical at the price of $201.90 per dry ton including tax and freight. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase contract for Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. P-068, to Peroxidation Systems, Inc. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation to award purchase contract for Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. P-068, for sulfide control, be, and is hereby, received and ordered f iled1 and, FURTHER H>VED: That said purchase be awarded to Peroxidation Systems, Inc. for the price of $3.52 per gallon plus tax. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to purchase sludge dewatering polymer products to conduct sludge Dewatering Polymer Trials (Specification No. P-069) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to purchase up to eight separate sludge dewatering polymer products from various vendors for use in conducting Sludge Dewatering Polymer Trials (Specification No. P-069), to determine performance characteristics in order to prepare specifications for a polymer bid in March 1985, for a total cost not to exceed $20,000.00 to purchase said.test quantities of polymers. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to conduct a Full-Scale Trial of Ferrous Chloride for Digester Gas Sulfide Removal (Specification No. P-070) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to conduct a Full-Scale Trial of Ferrous Chloride for Digester Gas Sulfide Removal (Specification No. P-070), for a total cost not to exceed $75,000.00, to determine costs and effectiveness of the process and to compare results with the Hiperion and Komax scrubbing systems, which are presently being evaluated, to determine the best system for complying with A()m regulations that would allow continued use of digester gas as an energy source. ALL DISTRICTS Ratifying action of the General Manager in issuing Purchase Orders re Emergengy Repairs to Conveyor at Plant No. 2 Sludge Handling Facilities (Specification No. M-018) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the action of the General Manager in issuing the following Purchase Orders re Emergency Repairs to Conveyor at Plant No. 2 Sludge Handling Facilities (Specification No. M-018) be, and is hereby, ratified: -9- 11/14/84 -Purchase Order No. 17824 to Serpentix Conveyor Corporation in the amount of $18,712.60 plus tax and freight for purchase of chain and rollers for the Serpentix conveyor Purchase Order No. 17850 to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $4,500.00 for repairs to the Serpentix conveyor Purchase Order No. 17826 to Falcon Disposal Services in the amount of $6,500.00 for interim sludge trucking and disposal services ALL DISTRICTS Ratifying action of the General Manager in issuing Purchase Order to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. for Emergengy Replacement of Sludge Withdrawal Line (Specification No. M-019) (Specification No. M-019) be, and is ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the action of the General Manager in issuing Purchase Order No. 17904 to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $11,700.00 for Emergency Replacement of an 8-inch Sludge Withdrawal Line on Sedimentation Basin "D" at Plant No. 2 hereby, ratified. Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on October 24, 1984, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Edgar reported that for Granting Authorization for SAWPA several months the Executive Committee to issue Industrial waste Discharge had been reviewing a request from the Permit to DOBS to accept pretreated Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority '....,! Stringfellow groundwater. wastes, (SAWPA) for permission to issue a permit subject to certain conditions to the State Department of Health . Services (DOBS) to dispose of pretreated groundwater· from the Stringfellow waste disposal site into the Districts' sewerage system. Be referred Directors to a report included with the Executive Committee Report and stated that the Districts' have been asked by Federal and State regulatory agencies, through SAWPA, to accommodate a request to assist in a project designed to protect both the upper and lower Santa Ana River underground water basins which includes Orange County's acquifers. The plan, which has been formulated to safely and economically dispose of the pretreated groundwaters, is supported by the environmental regulatory agencies including DOBS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the California State Water Resources Control Board, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. In addition, the Orange County water District, which manages the groundwater resources of Orange County, endorses the concept. The Chairman further reported that the proposal is to construct a treatment plant at the Stringfellow site, extract the contaminated groundwater from beneath Stringfellow and pretreat the waste to meet strict regulatory requirements and then place it in a holding tank for testing to assure that it is in compliance with Federal, State and, most particularly, County Sanitation Districts' standards. If it meets the requirements, it would then be hauled by truck twelve miles and discharged at a regulated disposal station of the SAWPA sewer system which connects to the Districts' sewerage system. Once in the sewer it would flow to the County Sanitation Districts sewage treatment facilities for further treatment with Orange County's wastewaters prior to ocean disposal. -10- 11/14/84 The Chairman then recognized Mr. Andrew Schlange, General Manager of SAWPA, and Mr. James Anderson, Executive Officer of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB), who reviewed the history of the project, the alternatives that had been considered and the studies and reviews conducted by the respective agencies in arriving at the proposed interim solution. '--I Mr. Schlange noted that SAWPA presently owns a capacity right in the Districts' Santa Ana River Interceptor which was constructed in the 1970's to remove high saline wastes from the upper basin to protect the underground acquifers of the Santa Ana River. SAWPA owns a similar capacity right in the joint treatment works. Mr. Schlange and Mr. Anderson reiterated that the treated groundwater must meet the same rigid requirements that all dischargers to the Districts' sewer system have to meet as specified in the Districts' uniform industrial waste ordinance. The ordinance establishes stringent conditions to assure compliance with the California Ocean Plan and EPA's NPDES permit which incorporates national pretreatment standards for protection of the public health and the environment. Based .on an analysis of the proposal, it has been determined that the discharge of the treated groundwater to the Districts' system would be insignificant and would comply with the Districts' ordinance and not have a de~rimental effect on the Districts' facilities, operations or the receiving marine environment. Mr. Schlange, in response to a question, stated that the proposal is an interim measure, anticipated to exist for a three to five year period, while studies regarding a permanent solution are completed. Extracted groundwaters from Stringfellow in an amount of approximately 60,000 gallons per day are presently being trucked to a Class I disposal site in Santa Barbara County at a considerable cost. The proposal is to extract and treat the groundwater at the rate of approximately 188,000 gallons per day. This interim measure would halt \...) the migration.of Stringfellow groundwater into the underground fresh water reserves of Riverside and Orange County. Although the underground plume from Stringfellow is rapidly approaching the Chino Underground Water Basin, it would take as much as 25 years to reach Orange County's basin. Mr. Schlange and Mr. Anderson reviewed the alternatives that had been considered by the sponsoring agencies. They noted that following the engineering studies EPA had earlier given public notice and made copies of the proposal available in Los Angeles, Riverside and Orange County public libraries and notices of the proposal had been placed in newspapers in the three counties. Following the review, EPA filed a Record of Decision, in compliance with the intent of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Record of Decision determined that the proposed alternative was the lowest cost and provided the greatest protection to public health and welfare and the environment. The procedures were in accordance with the requirements of the National Contingency Plan (NCP) and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). Mr. Anderson noted that although the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to special State legislation, CRWQCB must certify that there would be no impact on the ocean or beaches in Orange County and noted that his office had acted accordingly. Based on its review of the environmental studies conducted pursuant to CERCLA, Mr. Anderson also noted that enviromental reviews had been completed for the Santa Ana River Interceptor system at the time it was constructed which anticipated the discharge of industrial-type waste through the Districts' sewerage system from the upper basin. V -11- 11/14/84 The Board then entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the proposed proqram. Several Directors expressed concern that public environmental reviews had not been conducted in Orange County. It was also reiterated that an environmental impact report had not been conducted in Orange County by the Districts because the proposed program meets all the requirements of the California Ocean Plan, the County Sanitation Districts' NPDES permit and the Districts' Industrial Waste Ordinance, all of which are designed to protect the public health and safety and the environment. It was then moved and seconded: That staff be directed to request that the State Department of Health Services prepare a full Environmental Impact Report, and that further consideration of the request from the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority for authorization to issue a permit to the State Department of Health Services for disposal of the · pretreated Stringfellow groundwaters be tabled. During the discussion that followed, Supervisor Stanton, the maker of the motion, and several Directors spoke in favor of the motion. Supervisor Stanton referred Directors to a letter that he had circulated just prior to this meeting setting forth the reasons for his motion. It was stated that because the threat to the Orange County underground water basin is not irmninent, the delay would not cause any slow-down in the efforts to correct the situation and that the only apparent urgency was to reduce the considerable cost of the present method of disposing of the waste by trucking to Santa Barbara County. It was also stated that an EIR could possibly reveal other alternatives, and would assure that the citizens of Orange County be afforded the opportunity for public input on the program, and that there was some question as to whether the exemption of the environmental review provided by the state legislature was permissive or mandatory. Several Directors spoke in opposition to the motion stating that the proposal had received adequate technical and environmental review and that the proposed disposal of pretreated grpundwater would meet the strict requirements established to protect Districts' facilities and the environment. It was also pointed out that the Districts could terminate the discharge at any time if it did not meet the limitations imposed. Following further discussion concerning the conditions and safeguards that are to be imposed by the proposed permit to assure that all requirements are strictly complied with, and the propriety of an EIR, it was moved: That the provision of the motion to table further consideration of the request for authorization to issue the permit, be amended to defer further consideration until a response is forthcoming from the State. The seconder of the original motion concurred with the amendment. After further discussion by the Directors concerning the proposed program, the vote on the amended motion that the staff be directed to request that the State Department of Health Services prepare a full Environmental Impact Review, and that further consideration of the request from the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority for authorization to issue a permit to the State Department of Health services for disposal of the pretreated Stringfellow groundwater into the Districts' sewerage system be deferred until a response is forthcoming from the State, was polled by roll call. The Secretary reported that the motion had failed, Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 7 voting in opposition to said motion, and Districts Nos. s, 6 and 11 voting in favor of said motion. -12- 11/14/84 It was then moved and seconded that the Oranqe County Sanitation Districts Boards of Directors authorize approval of the qrantinq of a letter of authorization to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority to issue a permit to the State Department of Health Services to discharge pretreated Stringfellow groundwater to the Districts' sewerage system, subject to: \,,.) 1. Verification by staff that the Districts NPDES permit would not be in jeopardy with regard to the discharge limits. 2. That the us EPA superfund pay for a full environmental review to commence innnediately. 3. That the Superfund pay for daily monitoring of the effluent with reports provided to staff daily. 4. That the Boards of Directors be notified if any discharge of water does not meet the Districts ordinance requirements. 5. That the staff have the authority to terminate the acceptance of wastewater upon notification that any of the effluent does not meet the required limitations. The vote on the motion was then polled by roll call. The Secretary reported that the motion had passed, Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 voting in favor of said motion, and District No. 11 voting in opposition to said motion. ALL DISTRICTS Approving negotiated interim, short-term agreement with BKK corpgration for disposal of solids residuals Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the negotiated interim, short-term agreement with BKIC Corporation for . disposal of solids residuals from the treatment plants for the period November 15, 1984 through November 15, 1986, at an estimated annual cost of $879,0oo;oo with an option for a one-year extension, be, and is hereby, approved, as recommended by the Executive Committee. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Annual Report submitted by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Certified Public Accountants received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file and approve staff quarterly financial report for the three-month period ending September 30, 1984 ALL DISTRICTS Approving Agreement with John carollo Engineers to design Electrical Reliability at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-22, and at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Annual Report submitted by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1984, be, and is hereby, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff quarterly financial report for the three-month period ending September 30, 1984, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers for design of Electrical Reliability at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-22, and Electrical -13- 11/14/84 Reliability at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved1 and, FURTHER l«>VED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-189, approving an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Electrical Reliability at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-22, and Electrical Reliability at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-6-2, on an hourly-rate basis plus overhead, direct expenses and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $259,340.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving conceptual agreement with IRWD re formation of proposed District No. 14 The Joint Chairman reported that the staff and the Select Committee to Advise the Staff had met a number of times with Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) representatives relative to the proposed formation of District No. 14. The Select Committee also met inunediately preceding the Board Meeting to review a conceptual agreement between the Districts and IRWD. Chairman Edgar referred Directors to a letter submitted by IRWD dated November 14, 1984, summarizing the conceptual understanding and then outlined the basic provisions to be included in the agreement. It was then moved and seconded: That the Letter of Understanding submitted by Irvine Ranch Water District, dated November 14, 1984, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed1 and, FURTHER MJVED: That formation of District No. 14 be, and i& hereby, approved, in concept, with the understanding that a formal agreement generally containing the conditions set forth in said Letter of Understanding, and providing that upon receipt of the required land appraisal the purchase price may be subject to negotiation in the event the appraisal is significantly different from the preliminary estimate, be prepared for consideration by the Joint Boards1 and, FURTHER l«>VED: That the date previously established by the Boards for execution of an agreement by IRWD re the proposed formation of District No. 14 be extended from December 1, 1984 to December 12, 1984. During a brief discussion that followed, Director Neal, representing the City of Fountain Valley, expressed concerns of the City Council relative to the proposal. In answer to a question it was pointed out that an Environmental Impact Report would be prepared before the new District could be formed. Also discussed were the responsibilities of the respective agencies to the community-at-large to address and resolve the issues of waste disposal. Fountain Valley is the site of one of the regional wastewater treatment facilities and Irvine is presently the repository of wastewater solids residuals. The motion was then passed by voice vote. Directors James Neal and John Thomas asked that their votes in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 7 Approving Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications re Contract No. 7-8 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, transmitting a revised schedule of prices which included decreased quantities of pipe1 increased pipe sizes on Schedule A (IRWD alternative)1 deletion of the requirement of Type 2 bedding and miscellaneous clarifications re manholes, be, and is hereby, approved. -14- 11/14/84 DISTRICT 7 Report on Alternative bid schedules for Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, and receive and file letter from IRWD re said bids The Joint Chairman reported that, as requested by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD), alternative bids had been received on the District No. 7 Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8. Bid Schedule "A" in the amount of $5,325,000 includes capacity for District No. 14/IRWD and Schedule "B" provides capacity only for District No. 7 requirements. Chairman Edgar referred Directors to a letter dated November 14, 1984, from IRWD requesting that the Board award Schedule "A", but further requesting that District No. 7 negotiate with the contractor to delete IRWD's participation in the Von Karman reach so that District No. 14/IRWD capacity in the sewer would be only in the Main Street reach. The Joint Chairman stated that the contract could be awarded for the full-size pipe providing capacity for District No. 14/IRWD, but that the Board of Directors, although willing to consider the request to determine if a possible change in the Von Karman reach is feasible and legal, could not commit at this time to a change in the contract as requested by IRWD. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from Irvine Ranch Water District dated November 14, 1984, re award of Contract No. 7-8, Schedule "A", be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Contract No. 7-8, Schedule "A", to Steve Bubalo That the Board of Directors hereby Construction Company adopts Resolution No. 84-196-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and \.,) recommendation and awarding contract for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Schedule "A", Contract No. 7-8, to Steve Bubalo Construction Company in the amount of $5,325,000.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. IT WAS FURTHER MOVED: That said award be subject to receipt of a written obligation from Irvine Ranch Water District by November 21, 1984, to pay the sum of $867,696.00 to County Sanitation District No. 7, as its incremental share of the contract1 and, FURTHER H:>VED: That the Deputy Chief Engineer and General Counsel be directed to review the request of IRWD to negotiate a change order to modify the Von Karman reach and to determine if this is feasible, legally permissible and could be done at no cost to the District, and to report back to.the Board at the next regular Board Meeting. DISTRICT 1 Approving Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the City of Santa Ana Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-190-1, approving standard Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the City of Santa Ana in connection with Ordinance No. 105. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -15- 11/14/84 DISTRICT 1 Approving Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the City of Tustin Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-191-1, approving standard Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the City of Tustin in connection with Ordinance No. 105. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Approving Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-192-1, approving standard Agreement for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District in connection with Ordinance No. 105. A certified ·copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Receive, file and approve Summary Staff Report and Recommendation re Industrial Waste Permit Policies and Procedure the Executive Committee, be, and is DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Summary Staff Report and Recommendation re Industrial Waste Permit Policies and Procedure, dated September 20, 1984, as recommended by hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-175-1, Approving and authorizing execution of Amendment No. 7 to Agreement for \._,) Employment of General Counsel approving and authorizing execution of Amendment No. 7 to Agreement for Employment of General Counsel, as recommended by the Executive Committee. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:46 p.m., November 14, 1984. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:46 p.m., November 14, 1984. DISTRICT 3 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Contract No. 3-21-3R Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos Boulevard, 850 Feet South of Rossmoor Center Way to 100 Feet South of Rossmoor Way, Contract No. 3-21-3R, transmitting a revised Schedule of Prices to correct a unit of measure, be, and is hereby, approved. -16- 11/14/84 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Contract No. 3-21-3R to Copp Contracting, Inc. That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-194-3, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos Boulevard, 850 Feet South of Rossmoor Center Way to 100 Feet South of Rossmoor Way, Contract No. 3-21-3R, to Copp Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $200,856.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re contract No. 3-24-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and ·specifications for Katella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1, authorizing an addition of $9,374.00 to the contract with K.E.C. Company for construction of a reinforced concrete closure in lieu of a manhole and remodeling of an existing manhole1 and granting a time extension of 43 calendar days, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Contract No. 3-24-1 specif !cations for Katella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $5,993.20 from the contract with K.E.C. Company, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 3 Accepting Contract No. 3-24-1 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-195-3, accepting Katella Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-1, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Contract No. 3-28R Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, authorizing an addition of $42,672.98 to the contract with Mike Prlich & Sons for several items of additional work due to a more advanced state of deterioration than anticipated1 excessive groundwater1 removal and replacement of an undisclosed sewer line1 and cleaning and rebuilding pipes under the manholes in order to install bypass facilities1 and granting a time extension of 21 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:46 p.m., November 14, 1984. -17- 11/14/84 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:46 p.m., November 14, 1984. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:46 p.m., November 14, 1984. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 120 - Tract No. 9707 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-197-7, ordering annexation of 1.540 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santiago Canyon Road and Cannon Street in the Orange Park Acres area, proposed Annexation No. 120 -Tract No. 9707 to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:46 p.m., November 14, 1984. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:46 p.m., November 14, 1984. -18- ::: :t:> I !• ....... I ::: ... Ii ·41 ( FUND NO WARRANT NOe 070f.8fJ 010681 070682 0706A3 07UM 070685 070686 07C687 r7C6e8 07"689 073£90 0 71if.91 07CU2 070693 f\706CJ4 070695 070696 076697 (;70698 010699 U1070G 070701 Gl~l0'2 0707C3 C70704 070705 670706 C76107 070708 070709 070710 fi1n111 070712 070713 0707Jlt 070715 07all6 070711 070718 070719 070720 a7072l 07(1722 07Dln 01n2lf (,70725 ( ( '19CJ • JT DIST UCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/30/84 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION OJSlRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR ABC METALS SUPPLYt INC. ADYA~CO CCNSTRUCTORSt INC. AIR FROOUCTS & CHEHICALSt INC. ALLIS•CHALMERS CORP. AMERICAN AIR FILTERt INC. AMERICA~ lECHNICAL SUPFLY ANAHElr BUSINESS MACHINES THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. ANGELICA HEALTHCARE SERVICES AQUA BEN CORP. ARCO GLASS & MIRROR ASSOCIATE& ·LABORATORIES AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. BC INDUSTRIAL SUPFLY.t INC. BAKER EGUIPHENT R£NTALS BENZ lNGl~EERJNGt INC. BEVCO POMAR MAGNETO SCRVICEt INC. BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP v.r. BROOKE THE BURKE COMPANY BUTIER ENGl~EERJNGt INC. C & R RECC~OITIONING CO. CPT CALJFORNIAt INC. CALIF• ASSOC• OF SAN. AG£NCJES CAL SVITCH CARHENJ1A FORD TRUCK SALESt IN JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS CHEVRON u.s.A •• INC. CO"PRESSQA & INDUSTRIAL CONROCk CCMf'ANY CONSOLIOATEO ELECTRICAL OISTe CONTINE~TAL CHEHICAL CO COOPER £NERGY SERVICES COSlA HCSA AUTO PARTS, INC. CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER OME • I NC• ~'VALS SALES COHrANY DAYTON FOlNDRY DECO DELTA ANALYTICAL OIVe DONAHUE I co., INC. DORADO ENlEAPRISESt INC. OUHAS OIE!fl INJECTION DUNN EDWARDS CORF. EASTHANt INC. CLAIMS PAID 09/05/8- AMOUNT u,202.11 U t32h26le21 $38-.32 S9l .61 $407.S• ua.ss S253.3• $3-9.80 S626.33 S28t869.97 SHOe54 $3,255.00 $190.00 $726.-l us•.oo Sl24.83 S325e01 S66le25 171689.00 s•He92 S69e 74 S5t082e00 s•9o.oo Sl39.0l ss10.oo $59.14 Sl76.62 $21951.23 u,100.2s n22.so $617 .20 Slt487e36 Sl e998e 10 $8~3. 05 S6CJ3. U $98.60 uos.11 $36.9• Sle62G.98 $369.51 $716.38 s2,.ioo.oo S2CJ6.66 Sle772.15 $153.66 Slt15~.lf9 DESCRIPTION STEEL STOCK CONTRACTOR P2-25-2 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Off I CE SUPPL I ES OFFICE MACHINES PIPE SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYHENT CHEMICAL COAGULANTS GLASS LAB ANALYSIS TRUCK PARTS SMALL HARDWARE TOOL RENTAL ENGINE PARTS ELECTRIC CART PARTS ENGINE PARTS ENGR. 7-2C-lt EMPLOYEE MILEAGE SHALL HARDWARE CONSTRUCTION HANAGEHENT P2-2), P2-2,. .PUMP REPAIRS WORD PROCESSING HAINTENANCE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION WIRE TRUCK PARTS ENGR. P2-25-2 ENGINE Oil COMPRESSOR PARTS BUILDING HATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CHLORINE ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS RESIN TANK EXCHANGE ENGINE PARTS PIPE SUPPLIES CHAIN ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES, LAB SUPPLIES APPRAISAL SERVICE PW-IJI REPAIRS ENGINE PARTS PA I NT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES .. •· .- ... ::: :J:> ~ I t.....) I ::: ~i FUND NO WARRAtH NO. 070126 070727 07(1728 010129 070730 070731 070732 DlGl33 07013~ 07073!" 010736 070737 07C738 0101.39 01CaHO l'70Hl 070742 Ol01't3 f\1011t4' no 1q5 010746 01010 e7071f8 OlOH9 070756 "7"751 07Cl52 n707~3 (17(;75- 070755 r.l(i 756 070157 070158 Oltl75q 07r.760 07£:761 070762 070763 n7 c 76't 37r765 0707U 070167 070768 07076~ 070770 Olr.Hl ( 91q9 -JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/30/8~ PAGE Rf PORT NUHBCR AP~3 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRl~TS Of ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR ENCHANTERt INC. FALCON OISFOSAL SERVICE FEDERAL £•PRESS CORP. FISCHER I PORTCA CO. FISHER COlTROLS CO. FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. FLOYD-KORDICkt JeV• FORD TROCK SALVAGE CITY OF FCUNTAIN VALLEY FROST £.•61lEERING SERVICES CO. JULIE GARNER GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. GIERLICH•"llCH£LLt INCo GRE-1 PACIFIC £QUIP"ENT co. JEAN GRIGG LARRY HALL'S HARAINGTO~ INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS HOUSE Of BATTERIES P.s. HUGHES COet INC. ~UNDLEY COMPANYt INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTO~ BEACH RUBBER STAMP HUNTINGTON SUPPLY IRO ,ERCHANALYSIS INDUSTRIAL -SPHALl l•OUSTAIAL 1HREADEO PRODUCTS INGR•H PAFER BePe JOHN HAULING JOSLYN KFG. & SUPPLY co. ~.c.c. corPANY KELLY PIPE CO. klNG 8CARINGt INC. L.e.u.s •• INC. LA MOTTE CHEMICAL FRODUCTS H.v. LAWN,ASTER I CO• INC. LAWSON PRCOUCT~t INC. LERNER PHOTO, INC. LIGHTING CISTRIBUTORSt INC. LIQUID AIR CORP. THE CHARL£S LOW£ co. LYONS l~T'L SECURITY, INC. H.t.T. SCA GRANT PROG~AH H4RVAC Cl£CTRONICS MCCOOK PUHP '-CKCSSO~ C~fMICAL ro. rcKJ~LEY [GUIPH£~T CORF CLAIMS PAID 09/a5/8~ ( AMOUNT S3 .500.00 ss3,5·10.s1 n2.es S3t33l .. 93 S66e33 S65.A5 S53.833e95 '63'.00 $766 •• 3 '168.11 S5le66 S53• .31 Ult055.88 $993.39 S32.60 S265. 00 Sl66el5 S307e13 S612.23 S2t525&03 S9t173.06 u~ .15 S50e75 Sl65.00 $30.51 $293.96 u,011.2• Ue916.U $159.00 S6•e507e27 $693.6• ,_,353.99 • •••• 6.62 S231.U u t32l.05 S7S8.57 Sl 7.64 S329.05 S279. 80 SJ 7q.62 S66(u 00 $105.00 $81.61 S9tCJ95e80 Slft923.70 sn. 79 DESCRIPTION OCEAN MONITORING SLUDGE HAULING AND DISPOSAL DELIVERY SERVICE PIPE SUPPLIES, ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES REGULATOR PARTS LAB CHEMICALS CONTRACTOR PW-1)2 TRUCK PARTS WATER USEAGE VALVES EMPLOYEE HILEAGE' TELEPHONE FILTER PRESS BELTS FLOW HETER PARTS EHPLOYEE HILEAGE TRUCK REPAIRS SHALL HARDWARE BATTERIE·s PAINT SUPPLIES, SAFETY SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE OFF I CE SUPPL I ES SHALL HARDWARE SEMINAR REGISTRATION BUILDING MATERIALS SHALL HARDWARE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES WOOD SHAVINGS TRUCk PARTS CONTRACTOR J-2~-1 Pl PE SUPPLIES BEARING SUPPLIES WELDING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES TESTING J-2~-I, PW-12) SHALL HARDWARE FILH PROCESSING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WELDING SUPPLIES PUHP PARTS PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL PUBLICATIONS LAB SUPPLIES, ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS LAB CHEHICALS ENGINE PARTS (, ,. ~' ,. :::: J:::. I ; \.N :::: \. (' ' . -•· I ( FUND NO WJRRANT NO. 070172 070113 01011~ 070175 070716 C70177 070178 070779 07& 780 07Ci 781 0101U Ol0le3 n101a. 0101e5 0707l'6 070787 070788 010189 OllllCJO 07(1791 Ol07S2 070193 (J7 Ol9q Ole 7'5 f70796 070797 076758 ~70199 070800 01oeo1 1Jl0A02 070803 0708M 07'>8 05 070806 070807 3H8uR 071i809 070810 07C811 Olrt8l2 070813 0708H Gl0815 070816 070817 ( ( ql99 • JT DIST UCRKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/3018• PAGE REPORT NUHBCR Apq3 3 COUNTY SANllATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNlY VENDOR MCTRO lOXICANT PROGPAH MILLER DRJPERY SERVICE MORRISON co. MOTOROLA, INC. NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL CITY OF NEUPORT eEACH NOROSON CCRPORATION OCCIDENlAl CHE"JCAL CORP. · OLY"FIC CH£"1CAL CO. ONE DAY PAINT & eoDY ORANGE COUNlY CHEMICAL co. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION ORANGE VALVE & FITTING COe OXYGEN SUVICE COe OF ORANGC•AUDllOR CONTROLR COUNTY SAlllATION DISTRICT PACIFIC SAFClY EOUIPMENT CO. PAC I Fl C BELL PARAMOUNT MElAL & SUPPLY INC. FARTS UNLl"llEP FASCAL & LUDVIG PEATt rAR~ICKe MITCH£lL & COe 'PCRFORf.ANCE SPECIALISTS PCROXIDATION SYST£HSt INC. POSTMASlER HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE r.IKE PRLICH & SONS PROGRESSIVE STEEL SUPPLY THE REGISTER THE REGISTER REXNORD ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS RIFULLER SERVICES RYAN-HEPCC S & J CHEVPOLCT SANCON INC• SANTA ANA 0006£ SANTA A~A ELECTRIC "OTOPS SEE OPTICS SENSCREXt UC. SERPENTIX CONV£VOR CORP. SHAMROCK SUPPLY Sf41 TH•CHCRY CO. SO. CALIF. COASTAL WATlR SOUTHERN CALIF. EOISON CO. SO. CALIF. ~AT£R CO. SOUTHERN COUNTIES Oil CQ. CLAIHS PAID 09/05/8~ AMOUNT ue.•s $861.08 S371.36 Sf6tl32.l~ no.oo $51.30 S3He67 Ut1J9ell S28t66l e53 1289.98 S26e50 suo.oo SU4el8 s1u.n S6lt3•o.oo ss,ou. u u t267.53 soo.H u,e•a.:so · · OIJ8e08 S82t930e47 ss,91e.oo '2 e589. (12 s;s,1s2.u u,000.00 na.oa S2•t365e25 se1a2.1s '283.92 S275.52 S505e97 ssoo.oo Sl26.U $128.60 S60t9~8.78 S587 .OS S2t853e60 S613.oo $190.'tO neo.6& s2.212.69 u2a.oo u,1so.oo $236,996.13 $8.91 U5tU2.29 DESCRIPTION INDUSTRIAL WASTE PUBLICATION DRAPERIES PIPE SUPPLIES CONTROL g COHHUNICATIONS EQUIPHEHT TRAINING SEHINAR WATER USEAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CAUSTIC SODA CHLORINE TRUCK REPAIRS LAB CHEMICALS FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECTION Pl PE SUPPLIES SPECIALTY GASES COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES REIHBURSE WORKERS' COMP. FUND SAFETY SUPPLIES, FIRST AID SUPPLIES TELEMETERING PW-115 RETENTION TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR P2-26, PW-12) RETENTION 1'8J-8~ ANNUAL AUDIT TRUCK REPAIRS HYDROGEN PEROXIDE POSTAGE INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAHPLING ICE CONTRACTOR J-28R STEEL STOCK CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING· LEGAL ADVERTISING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTROL EQUIPMENT PIPE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR l-2R-2,J TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC HOTOR PARTS SAFETY GLASSES SHALL HARDWARE STEEL STOCK TOOLS, SHALL HARDWARE TESTING P2-26, P2-25-2 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY POWER WATER USEAGE DIESEL FUEL •' I .. H ::: :p: ·1 ..s::-• ::: , ,. ' _. ~ FUND NO UARRA~l NO. 070818 070819 ~76620 070821 070822 070823 C70621\ 070825 07082(, 070627 OlL828 07G829 G70830 070831 070832 n10933 07083~ d7 oe;,,s 070836 070837 070838 0708~9 'll0840 (" 9199 -JT DIST UCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/30/8~ PAGE REPORT NUMOE~ AP43 COUNTY SANllATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VCNOOR ~PCEOE SPEEDOMETER DENNIS STEPHENSON SUPER CHEM CORP THE SUPPLIERS J. UAYNE SYLVESTER TAYLOR•DUU F.H. THOMAS AIR CONOITIONING THOR TEMPORARY SERVICES TRAVCL lRAVEL TROPICA~A APARTMENTS TRUCK & ALTO SUPPLYt INC. JeG• TUCKER & SONt INC. FRANK ULT IMO UNITED PARC£L S£RYICC UNITED STATCS SAFE DEPOSIT CO VUR SCl£N11FIC VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. VAAECt INC. CLAIHS PAID 09/05/8~ AMOUNT 183.62 S15e99 S552e83 S2t50~e89 S2t238.9J sa.010.u S3t45•• 05 su•.b9 S652.0G $595.38 Sl t830.65 S857.•3 S2t057.H '37.30 $828.00 S139.67 Slt885.92 SJ.068.U no.12 DESCRIPTION TRUCK REPAIRS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES, TOOLS PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ELECTRIC CART PARTS AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES TEMPORARY HELP AIR FARE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PV-112 RETENTION DELIVERY SERVICE DISC PACK SERVICE LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES LAB SUPPL I ES ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ~ UAUKESHA £NGIN[ SE~VICENTER WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CO~P UHITEt Fl,£ I VERVILLE EYE~ETT H. YORK CO. S973e55 Slt801.0• S365e70 1609.96. DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY ENGINE PARTS ZIP TE"PORARV PERSONNEL TEMPORARY HELP TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/051&• S2t259t3A8el2 ================= I • ( (, ,, .. ! ... j• 'j I 1 .. ·~ I Vl ::: ! I "" ( FUND NO 919, -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL SUHHARY #I OPER FUND IL ACO FUND 12 OPER FUND 12 ACO FUND 13 OPER FUND iJ ACO FUND 13 f /R FUND 15 OPER FUND IS ACO FUND 16 OPER FUND 16 ACO FUND 17 OPER FUND 17 ACO FUND #7 F/R FUND Iii OPER FUND Ill ACO FUND #5&6 OPER FUND 16'7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. iNSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND ( (, PROCESSING DATE 8/J0/81t PAGE . . . . . UPoU NUM8ER APO . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY CL~IHS PAID 09/05/8~ AHOUHT $ 602.'6 2,Jlt0.00 1,07'.51 5,~59.00 5JJ. 18 "6, i2 i. 75 65,5]8.67 ],578."3 i,886.oo ]2. 78 1t221. 50 i,596.U 5,926.00 7,689.00 73. i8 IJ t 22'. so 26.20 , ,. . ,2 529,798.51 1,505,8)6.JI s.ou~ ii 53,789.75 $2. 259 t J88. 12 5 / :.: t::.d I ~ :: .., . •• 1· FUND tJO "lRRANT NO. 070861 07(166~ n7CP63 fJlOfM OH865 971)866 IHCtc6l 010~68 'J70669 07"87L 97!1871 070872 '110813 OlllAllf r?lf.!875 07 "876 Cl Of'll n1ue1e . 010819 07fJf'80 070881 Olf\882 ('7!)883 0708P.' 07C885 070886 OBe&l 'l7 !1888 0708~9 070890 OH ~91 Ola92 t'10893 07 GA9i\ ('7f)l)':J5 n~P.96 ~}:)~97 070~98 "1 ~~q9 Ol09i10 f)7f1901 0 71)~!)2 01t903 'J109~'1 07!',C)5 (17!''JQ(, ( 9199 -Jl OISl WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/1,./61\ PAGE Rf PONT HUHOEP ~Flf 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG£ COUNTY VrNOOR A-J INSTITUTIONAL [QUIP• f.O• A. M. F. VOIT AIR FROOUCTS & tHCHJCALStlNC. All-STATE VCHICLESt INC. ALLIS•CHALH£RS COPP. AHEPICAN COMPRESSOR PAPTS AttERICAN DISTRICT HlHUPtl AMETEK t INC. ANA~EIH SEVER COHSTPUCllON lHE ANCHOR PJCKING CO. AQUA BCN CORP. ARCO GLASS & HIRROA ARROW•RISCOt INC. PANDOLPH •USTIN CO. 8&9 TRUCKS eAKER PLYWOOD co., INC. eANCROFT•WHllNEY co. !ECKHA" INDUSTRIAL BCCKMAN IN~USTRIAL L.U. BEMIS TRACTOR & JKPL~~ENT BEV CO 61ERLY & ASSOCIATESt l~C. 816 80) RENTAL CO. eoe•s RADIATOR BRISTOL PARK HEDICAL G~P.o l~C TH£ BURKE COMPANY CPT CAllfORNIAt l~C. CAL-PAATITIONSt INC. CARCO, INC. CARLSON MACHIN£ CO. CH~AL[S U. CART£P CO. CHESTERTON LOS AN~ELES CONNELL CHEVROLET CONSQLIOAT£0 ELECTRICJL Ol~To CONSOLIDATE~ R~PROOUCTIONS CONTINE~TAL CHCHICAL CO CONTINENTAL RAOl~TO~ COOPER ENERGY SERVICES COSTA ~£SA AUTO PiRTSo.l~C. CAL CONSOLIDAlEO W~T[P STATE OF CALIFORNIA STAT£ OF CALIFORNJ- STAT[ Of CALIFORNI• STAT£ OF C~LIFOANJA ~TATE OF C~LIFOPNIA OAILY PILOT CLJIMS PAID 09/l~/84 ( AHOUNT U 12• I ·6l st 116• 013 s.t?9.n '1t'+IJ8el0 S••l2:l.5' SI tR'l•••O su •• oo u1211.oo S2t60'1e00 $819.26 $23162• .57 $63.60 $39.53 $28,1\65.50 S2t65!1e1C '93ll.32 S65.7• S1 •21 'S.·~;i st 1166. 00 $9~.6• Sl t2!1·9.?.5 S55'l e 'JO Sl1'>•5.J'> Sl,!).8• na. 1u1 Ut5.58 U63.20 st0 •• 65.98 U t 03 7.. SE S~t672•'0 $17.97 S2leR7 S'-ftol• 121967.32 U ,U9. 7A S3t 581 e•P. S21l8.8f lQtl.61 $39~.0Q '?.51.05 "61i. tJll '1f>'). !Jlt $163.JO f 'f.J 1). 00 '.f.1'1 ~. ·l(,'I $\th2P 0£SCPIPTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT SPECIALTY GASES VEHICLE tEASE PUHP PARTS COMPRESSOR PARTS ALARM SYSTEH MAINTENANCE HEAT EXCHANGER CSDOC 11 MANHOLE REPAIRS ENGINE PARTS CHEMICAL COAGULANTS GLASS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS TRUCK PARTS lUHBER PUBL I CAT I-ON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC CART PARTS WORKERS: COHP. AOHINISTRATOR TRASH DISPOSAL TRUCK REPAIRS PRE EHPLOYHENT EXAHS ENGINE PARTS WORD PROCESSING HAINTEHANCE OFFICE PARTITIONS TRUCK PARTS CHAIN PIPE SUPPLIES FREIGHT TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION CHLORINE TRUCK REPAIRS ENGINE PARTS TRUCK P~RTS WATER SOFTENER RENTAL, RESIN TANK EXCHANGE ANNEXATION 12-19 PROCESSING FEE ANNEXATION #2-25 PROCESSIRG FEE ANNEXATION #2-29 PROCESSING FEE ANNEXATION #2-59 PROCESSING FEE ANNEXATION 12-36 PROCESSING FEE LEGAL ADVERTISING ( •· I' I, : i !.'. I, :.• ; .. : . ' i"' !: l . !, ' j· ._, ... O;j I I'.), . ::: !1&. ·1 I I 1 .. i"; i:f ' I. i' .. •• ( FUND NO WARRANT NO. "10907 010908 070~09 070910 070911 010912 fH:l913 UCH4 C7C915 1)70916 07P9l7 P.l 0918 1)10919 07Q920 OlC921 070922 07fl923 070924 070925 noCJ26 Ut'927 C7D928 f)7992CJ 070930 . 07~931 070932 !)71)93~ 979934 07~935 '?7r936 070937 070938 U0939 070946 0709'11 1!7C9'42 01'l94l 07C944 noc;•s 07091f6 1Hl'947 07t948 ill091f9 !J1095:> e7095l '17(i952 ( 9199 • Jf DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCCSSIUG OAT£ 9/14/R4 PAGf RE~ORT ~UM0ER APlf3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OR•NGE COUNTY VENDOR 0 1 VALS SAL[S COMPANY MICHAEL Re OCBLlfUX DECO DELPHI SYSTCMSt INC• OIGIDYNE COHFUTER SERVIC£S DOLLINGER CORP. CLAIMS PAID 09/19/A4 . AMOUNT S30e3A S6•.28 St;771e1JO OESCP.IPTION PIPE SUPPLIES CONFERENCE EXPENSES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES COMPUTER PROGRAMMING NINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE COMPRESSOR PARTS ( 2 DOPADO ENT[RPRISESt INC• DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 1225.'IO SJ. •l?.6. 08 Sl180'!l.~6 S1e33a.28 U78e78 Sle&H.40 $823.60 ss•. 76 SCRUBBER REPAIRS, PLANT 11 ENTRANCE GATE REPAIRS PAINT SUPPLIES [JMCO PROCr.ss fQUIF. co. EAST HANt I NC• EBER~A~O COUIP"ENT ELCCTRONIC BALANCING co. FALCON DISPOSAL srRVICE FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. FISCHER & PORTFR co. FISHER SCJFNTIFJC co. FLO-SYSTEMS FRANC£ COHPRCSSOR PRODUCT COWARD A. FRANCIS FROST ENGINEERING S£RVICES COe F~UIT GROVERS lABOAATORYi INCi CITY Of FULLERTON GANAHL LUMBER CO. ···JUL 1£ GARNER GENERAL TELEFHONE CO. H.e • NURSERY ffACff CO"PANY URRY HALL'S HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL rLASTICS MICHIELHEINZ v.c. HfNDRIE & co., INC. HONEY"Cllt INC. HUNTINGTON VALLEY TOOL HYDRO TEX ISCO COMPANY IHP~RIAL UEST CHl"IC•L co •. INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IRVINE INDUSTRIAL LANOSC•PE IRVINE RANC~ WAlER OIST~lCl JOHNSTON PUHP CO. k.r..c. COMPANY KAS SAFCTY PRODUCTS l<Cll\' PIPE CO. KING DEARING, INC. L i ~ UNJFORH SUPPLY CO t.e.u.s., 1Nc. . '42• so Sl2t652.19 S2•. ·JO S327e56 S33el0 f.303.16 S6t6Mi l9 S179e67 S59ilel7 SH'• OD , $175.91 $889.42 St0.89 SltU6e76 S2 t650. OU ns,.11 s201.u u,.65 S36. qo S2t!>96e6't S53e93 S'l6e65 s3,q95.53 st· 118 .83 Sllt722e'l7 130t78:?.olg S74't.6~ '"•3U \5?.2.Sl\ t:\9.«Jf!q.29 s.rn.11 S2')~.7q \'t,1'41.2? f.l\,7'H.lf0 ... ~fl. '12 ,PIPE-SUPPLIES OFF I CE SUPPL I ES TRUCK PARTS -scROLL BALANCING SLUDGE HAULING ANO DISPOSAL FREIGHT PIPE SUPPLIES LAB MANUAL PUMP PARTS .. -coHPR!SSOR PARTS TRAVEL EXPENSES VALVES LAB ANAL VS IS WATER USEAGE LUMBER ·· EMPLOYEE HI LEAGE · TELEPHONE LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES TRUCK REPAIRS SHALL HARDWARE EMPLOYEE MILEAGE GEAR PARTS STRIP CHARTS TOOLS ENGINE Oil LAB SUPPLIES FERRIC CHLORIDE COMPUTER SYSTEM PLANT MAINTENANCE WATER USEAGE BEARING SUPPLIES CSDOC 15 EMERGENCY REPAIRS SAFETY SUPPLIES PI PE SUPPLIES BEARING SUPPLIES UNIFORM RENTAL WELDING SUPPLIES i' ::: °' I \.N ::: -.. i 11··1 !··· . FUND NO VARRANT t.IOe 070953 ~7n9M 97!'-:'S!i 4.'10~56 970957 07('9~8 070959 070960 070961 1)1 ~CJU 010963 07fJ9M 070965 070966 07U96l U'l968 1!70969 fJ70970 07!?971 0701?72 070,73 07 091'1 C7l'975 !!70976 OH917 07r.978 07'97" IJ709AO noc;e1 070982 0709S3 01098• 1)70985 07U9A6 07 ~«JU 1)10988 QJ(1989 '170991 97 'J991 07f\992 07CQ93 ~7 t.991f 07fJ995 07!'996 97'Jq•n 07')998 ( 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCE$SING OAT£ q/14/8~ rAGE Rf PORT NU"q[R APlf3 ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY CLAl"S PAID '19/1918~ VEN£JOR LA MOTTE CHCHICAL PAOOUCTS LAUNDRY HOOD LAURSEN COLOR LAB HeY• LAVNHASTER & COt INC. LEUPOLD & STEVENS LEWCO flECTRIC co. LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS1 INC. LILLY TYPESETTING LOS AN6£L£S TIMES LYON~ INT'l SECURITY, INC. MARTIN lUT~£R hOSrlTAL ffCCROHCT£R CORP HCKESSON C~EHICAL co. "ILLER DRAPERY SCRVICC MINE S'fETY APfLIANCES COe PAUL Ae MITCHELL MONTGOHERY ELEV•TOR COMPANY Je ARTHUR HOOREt CAt INCe (.8. "ORITZ FOUNDRY HYfRS TIRE SUPPLY NATEL & co. NATION~L ACADEMY OF SCIENcrs NATION~l LUH8£R SUPPLY NATIONAL SAFETY CCUNCIL OCCIDENTAL CHEHICAL CORP. OLYHPIC CHE"ICAL CO. O~E DAY PAINT & DODY ORANGC COAST FOPD TRACTO~ ORA~GE COUNTY FARH SUPrLY COe OXYGEN SERVICE COUNTY OF ORANG( COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PACIFIC MOSJLE OFFIClS PACIFIC SAFETY £9UIP"FNT co. PA~JS UNLIHITCO PEAlt MARVICKt MITC~Ell & COe PEROWIDATION SYSTEHSt l~C. PR£NTIC£-HAllt l~C. HAROLD PRJHROS£ lf.E RAFFfRTY INTERNATIONAL TPUCKS RAINBOW DISFOS•L COe RAND CO"PUTER CENTER RE•CY-~LEfN CORP. TH£ REGISTER T~[ REGISTER RICOH CORP ( AffOUNT SJ su. 8fl Sl61J.68 $4Jf.e'l3 st.194.30 S213.fal S306e56 so•CJ. u $763.20 Sl7'hOE' use.so ss,s~a.ns Uot.!i6 Sl13elt2 n1.10 S5e30 $36.~9 Sl28e48 StH.49 12t03el6 na•.s• '2t125e00 S2 l .9~ S.568.10 n10.uo Sl1t935e90 Slt t454e0f $23~ .22 Sl66. :s. SI t35le;!8 $36• 71 s•·JS. 79 S532.00 nu.o• i2t J. 98 n11.2e S8t655en.O u,11~.eo '9f.1. 5• Sl"fl·HO S51 • 76 S.\34 elJO f.A2Cfe86 S103.68 Jf,15.!\9 '""7-13 SB!;.68 DESCRIPTION LAB CHEMICALS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT f ILH PROCESSING TESTING P2-26, P2-25-2 CABLE ELECTRIC CART PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TYPESETTING CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL USE CHARGE OVERPAYHENT ENGINE REPAIRS LAB CHEHICALS DRAPERIES PUHP PARTS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE PLANT #2 ELEVATOR HAINTENANCE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES HANHOLE RING & COVERS TRUCK TIRES COHHUNICATION SYSTEM CONSULTING PUBLICATIONS SHALL HARDWARE SAFETY SEHINAR CAUSTIC SODA CHLORINE TRUCK REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS LARDSCAPING SUPPLIES SPECIALTY GASES LAB ANALYSIS REIMBURSE WORKERS' COMP. FUND TRAILER RENTAL SAFETY SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS 1,8)-8~ ANNUAL AUDIT HYDROGEN PEROXIDE PUBLICATIONS INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE TRUC.k PARTS TRASH DISPSOAL COHPUTER SERVICES-DISTRICT #6 ENGINE PARTS GLASSIFIED ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING COPBER RENTAL ( .. ( FUND NO ; . ,., UARRANT NO. :·1 ,. I I -· :: 070999 011090 071COt 07 H''>2 071,03 C71904 071005 01 J P.06 011007 071008 071009 071010 011011 071012 011l'l3 ll710U 'l71l'15 01 ln.16 011011 071018 071019 !)11020 fJ71 n21 011022 07 ll'23 07B2~ 07l IJ25 nu 026 071027 011028 U 1029 Cll 030 e71031 Dll 032 ~71033 ClH3~ 071035 n lll36 IJ7!037 071038 C!7lt'139 I. I.: I' "'' : I ·' ·.: tX1 I ..::.:-:: ( 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCf.SSING OAJC 9/l~/8tl PAGE R(PORT NUMOCP AP43 COUNTY SANITATION 01$JRICTS OF OR•NGE COUNJY VENDOR ROBEPTSHAV CONTROLS CO. ROCCO'$ TRUCK URCC~IN6 RYA"-HCRCO SUH A -NA 0006[ SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS YVONNE SCHVAB SENSOlt £X t It.IC• SHAMROCK SUPPLY SMITH PIPE I SUPPLY• INC SOUTHE~N CALIF• EDISON co. SO. CAL• GAS CO. · SOUTHEHN COUNTl[S OIL COi SPACE SPRING & ST•MPIN6 CO. STAINLESS PlfC & FITTING CO. THf· SUPPL JCRS Uk Ul<AMINC TECHSONICS THOftPSON LACQUER CO• THREE M to. CHANNON Ce TIA Tiff[ CLOCK SALfS & S[RVfC[ TOM ARCO TO~Y'S LOCK & SAF£ SERVICE TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLYt INC. UNION Oil CO. OF CALIF• UNITED PARCEL SERVICE ·vvP SCIFNTIF'IC VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. V•LVr. I STEEL SUPPLY co. V4NIER GUPHICS VAqcc. INC. RICHlRO Ve VON LANG£N CLAIMS PAID 09/19/84 AMOUt4 T S25~e83 S7'J'l.9a S26;>.13 134 .53 S1 t IJ9'1 .23 S1". 3!) S255e69 SJ,463.21 $111•56 Sl05e 159.81 S2,CJ99el8 SI Ot'l6 1h38 $236.53 S165.•2 st •2'>7 •!)I) st• fUJ•l. 0 9 $702e69 · S trl"• !JO $160.65 S23.lj8 s101.12 u16.:11 S5le79 S2•39R• 71 sue.01 s2a. 12 SI t~"H•29 f.tl 3!1. 'J6 Sl85.5l' U9tl .t"O DESCRIPTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC MOTORS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TOOLS PIPE SUPPLIES 'POWER NATURAL GAS DIESEL FUEL PI PE SUPPLIES Pl PE SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES, TOOLS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTROL EQUIPMENT PA I NT SUPPL I ES OFF I CE SUPPLIES EHPLOYEE MILEAGE ·TIHE CLOCK REPAIRS TOOLS LOCK REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS GASOLINE DELIVERY SERVICE LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES, TOOLS. VALVES PRINTED FORHS STEEL STOCK CONFERENCE EXPENSES 4 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIAT£S1 INC. JOHN Re UAPLCS S9.924.n2 ss3-..20 S3t429e39 S392e'tR S3llO.dO Sltllle51 U1Hl.BO u u.as CONTRACT AOMINSTRATION P2•2J-6 ODOR CONSULTING VEMCO PU14PS VESTERN VIRE I ALLOYS WESTINGHOUSE EllCTRJC COPP UITEG SCIENTIFIC THOMAS le WOODRUf Ft INC. XEROX CORP. . ZIP TEHPORARV PERSONNfL TOTAL CL~IHS f-10 Q~/19/~a\ U21950.35 S'tt2.80 SHf'u~8 Stl8.S.6S7ef'l ======~========== IHPELLER PARTS WELDING SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LAB REPAIRS LEGAL SERVICES XEROX REPRODUCTION TEMPORARY HELP ( \ / .... t•: j:·.; ~. ::: Oj ( I u, • :: i.. H ; . b '• ' ( FUND NO . 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/1~/8' PAGE REPoin NUMBER APlaJ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/19/8~ SUHHARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $ g,206.U TroPIR--F-uND 9, I 9'i~l2 #5 OPER FUND ltl,028.57 15 ACO FUND 11.), 16 OPER FUND ... es~ .• ,. 17 OPER FUND 6,525.19 17 F/R FUND 265.6, Ill OPER FUND . .. lt,87).29 llJ ACO FUND J,.oo 13&9 OPER FUND Z,~2).16 15&6 OPER FUND 1,020.50 16&7 OPER FUND ,6.65 JT OPER FUND 25J,J79.6J CORF . . 85,))1.j6 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND 110.50 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND 1,082.00 JT WOllklNG CAPITAL FUND ... 0,2]1a.cU TOTAL CLAIHS PAID 09/19/llt $'8J,667.81 .. ( ( r, FUND NO ~&qq -JT DIST WORKING CA~ITAL ( ( PROCESSING DATE 10/01/84 PAGE 1 -----------··-----------.Rr-oE"'""P,.....0.-::R~T--WMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGt COUNTY ~I' JI . CLA IHS PAID 10/03/84 . . . . . . . . . .· ·. . .· . ;I -···-··-·------· ··-· ---------.... -·-·· ·-···-·· .. · ··-·--···· ·-----------·-· ·-·· _____ ........ _. __ -------·--·---------·-------··-··--·-···-"·--.. -------------··-···-·----·--.. ·-....... --·-··· ~ . I MARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT • DESCRIPTION J 1-1 --·-oTIOSS ··--rr;l5;-A01"As· E1HfJ5AllY 1---sru.90 ·''TUBING ·--. ·'. 07l056 ADVANCO CONSTRUCT()Rs, INC. S150;327~~8 CONTR~CTO~ P2':"U-2 . 071057 AIR CALIFORNIA . / '· I;_ . • $5~4.00 ..... .. .>All\· FARE . ·•.: '.f :. ". -~.. .. ·1 :7H5a-----·· All HAKI'.Sl!Fl'Tft" MACHJN£-co. $232. H OFF I CE SUPPL I ES 11 071C59 ALLIS-CHALMERS CORP. Sltl62e38 PIPE SUPPLIES 11 071&60 AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY • S2t425e58 SOLVENTS .. ., ll 71Clil--·-·-·-----·"lMERICAN Distin-Cf TELEGRAPft ' sss.oo J ALARtt SYSTEH R~PAiRS. "' -.>~ ... ~ ',· ~ .. ' . II ••. 071062 AMERICAN TECHNICAL $UPPLY" -<: .. · .. · . ..; · ." .. ,, $18~~9,_~._.:;:'.' .:J 0Ff1C-~SUPPLIES ·. -.· ... ·,,·~::-"~·>·:,.;~:_;<<~.'~ ./ :: . I dA .. .. , .... . ~ ..... f ~ • ~ 1 • k 1 11 i-~ .... /.,; ~1' .: ~ ... ~ t E ' At i.6 "1 11 ~ ,.. \ . . ~;..~: ~ ~ ,.,., . -!"\ f • • "' ~ ~ ~ ·-' ' 1• 071063 ANAHEI "· B~S N~SS n CHINE~; :. . ~;';·.~ ..•. ~.-·:!-."·-· ."~~·"·' .;. ·. ·!1,, .~ ,· '·1 .. :s1~ ' . ,.,, t>• ·;-.-.t: ~".J:<: uFF . M n nE~ . ,·.,·."1~·\-·. ·~"·-" ·:.r.:".•• · .. ; r > · · : : _. ·-·---~~- " -o·nn-64 ----YHE ANCHOR PACKING c6. $11645.78 ENGINE PARTS tt 071065 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES s100.oo TOWEL RENTAL 11 071066 AQUA BEN CORP. S25t698e80 CHEHJC~~ COAGULANTS _ 1s b1 Al11iJlNG MASTERS . · , ; ·•,,;>-:t~'. .•. .-., ~ ~(::·· .·: J,,,.fa;·:•' .. '.::.:~·:~ ·:;:: .. ·JH(),§1 .. :£)::,;.;.:.,r~-.. ~:ef\OHCJIV~ SIHRUN~ .. cpNFUJH~t/fft.A[LU .. : ·. · · 20. 011 o6a fie. iNou~.t~ ~~. ~.; s. upf>'-·.v•·.:·tN .. ~~::~i:~:::~·;,/'.·/~·~·;>:· .. ~.·~';Y;(;t.<·~-\t.L:~Y\.·••~s .. ~?q-.. f.S?\:·~·:."·k11;:·sHAtl.: ~A~~wA~e .. :<::1:\::1:~>~·~:;:~~;;~:::~1~~·; ·~> C<'< .. · . : · · · , 11 071069 B4CKFLOW P~EVENTJON·DtY,tJ:E~·,,~~1 ·,1._~::.\g;~~:~·."~'·,:;•,'.fJ;.-~·;\;~~l J.~f·'..J J ._. ,J.lftJ,qr-·:~~-r~ E\ltU\'tU.t. o.::~~.\:.~t).·;.~:.'':l~°'u~;r~·:t~ "t~\:~./!~:1~~/ ~:_J:_~·-··'·--~ 22 ·----tfANK Of l'Mtti S 55 • 4 BOND AND COUPON PROCESS I NG 19 u 07 J 071 BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA $642.30 TRAVEL EXPENSES ~ 24 071072 P.ENZ ENGINEERINGt INC. S310.70 COMPRESSOR PARTS 11 : ,.. 011 01! =~~~ri~A~-'. s ... :<·. ~ .. ::1:-~ .. <>;'.~/::_~;/ ~'.-0j~~·~ 1~~ -f:p_.:. ..~J.~§; .... fa~i:%[j~~~t: : b q~J'.U.: .. '~~~t,-~i~t~~i~~~-~'.~~;~;);~;:·;{;i';fiif't.i~.-.->L_ · ., . :. w "'" 071075 BOYLE. ENGINEtRING:·CO~f>:··.s~-.,·,.::l-~ .. t:\<~-.4i,., ... ~.~-~,~~~f~g,: ~~· .· b~ • . ', ~. '!.· -fl":,., R ";:;: -~ .\·" :· '._;f, .'-¥1·~ .. ,. . : '.: TU 'I ·;~· -~-..;;__··-n n I 711)7~ S S56e66 FREIGHT JI n 1--1 071 lj77 BUCKEYE GAS PRODUCTS $7e 75 PROPANE : 111 :::: 071078 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRStINC S292e00 SUBSCRIPTION 10 : . ·~ ~rn; l:l J! ~~r ~=m ::1 ~~t ~.·-·I ~t .{.ti\.~\t(ib;. _:rl·: ·~·~;t;;\?·· .J:!!tai~ ,~~;i~ir~J,t! l;It!lfii! !~! ... ~~ ~,',i~J$l~'~,:;dit.~·::c<~-, ..--,··Jii J4 "11li82----A R P & V R \ SU3.64 BUILDl .. G MATERIALS :~ n 071083 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS S76t509e01 ENGR. P2-26, Pl-21, P2-28, ENERGY TASK FORCE tt 0710~4 CHEVRON u.s.A., INC. . S13t887.36 GASOLINE ENGINE OIL ., 1-------ns-s------coHPRESSOR.& INDUSTRIAL ENUJNE SUPPLY .co,· '·,. ·1661.SQ:·;,\· .. rd~.:·POMPREPAIRS ·· .. · .. :: .. '.·. '.<,~::··;<t .. :.'::· ,''· t'11oe6 coNNELL cH~VR9LEt . . ... ·: ·'.'.·:. · ·· ~:' :. · 1 •12.·~, ·\! ,·:').·/:_~: ritOc~ .f»~rtts .. < . . : ·., .~>.\~ .. ,,~· '.(-<-.:.i.i;.::.... , ~~ 071087 CONSOLIDATED E:lJ:CT~tCAL OUT•· .:,,. ,.·.. .·~ ·stt28:$•!D .:_12 )'-', .• ·;0 EltCTRICAL SUPPLIES.'···.-_:;,,:,:.·:-.;.\. :, .. :~.. -·--·.2 G7TOB"B ·------·--cnN!ronDJTElr"F~·rn;RillAY s341. IO -FRE 1 GHT -s1i 071 oeq CONSOLI DATED REPRODUCTIONS $502 .65 DRAFT I NG SUPPL I ES :1 ,. 071090 COOPER ENERGY SERVICES S10tlf25e26 ENGINE REPAIRSt ENGINE PARTS _ ~ l u -lJTI~r-------·l:'fJ"S'TT-MtsA AUTO PAR TSt INC• 125"lr.72 "TRUCK PARTS .. ··.. --, .. , 44 071092 CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER . . s21.7o 'WATER>SOFTENER RENTAt' -·~ ~ i>71093 STATE OF CALIFORNIA · Si60e00 ANNEXATION_i:l!_PROCESSING FEE··· -------------· 141 ...... , ----r,7ro9q-·· -·--·--·-·-c-~~-;-fl}V"[S"""SUPHf-c-O.---------·--·------:--·-n20·"1-----PLASTI c SHEET I NG 51 071095 DECO S'tt287.0lf ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES :~ 11•1 071096 DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. S391f29.38 CHLORINE PIPE REPAIRS, EFFLUENT CHANNEL -~~~LR~-·--·-- .,r---1r7ll197 ··-·--···. ---ouRU-UTE'SEL""TNJECTilJ~------·-----------uu.o3 ENGINE PARTS -1"'• 071098 DUNN EOVARDS CORP. S3i8.00 PAINT SUPPLIES 1511 °~;~:~ · ... -----·-·--·--·-~~~~~ ~ER~~,j~-;------·--·--··-----· -----·----------· !~ ;~~~: ~: -·-~H!~E H~~~t~H~c----· ., ----·---~'~:, ·-~---__ .. _ IP II ..... ... , ---·----···-··· -----· -:: -------~-. 1.• r,• ... .• J 1~4 \\ ··-·--·----· ·-·-·--~----···--------· ... -. -J ~ FUND NO WARR ANT NO. 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/01/84 FAGE ~EPORt~NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ... ----------····---------CLAI~.! .. .f.~1.!LJ.~l_~]/8 __ 4 ______ _ VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 2 ,, (.,./ ,,,. , I 1-~~-:-"Z"··~.~ ....... A~ • .--~~~~~~~E ..... P~R~P~hr"rlTl~-p~Q~h~KnP~~~gr-~Mnn~ft;:-;n:;--~...,.....,.._~...-~~--::--~~~-:--:--:-~~~-:---:-~~.~.~ft.-Aft~ft.--:-0~-:-~~-ie~dll"l!e~•~rlri.~UrfP-~--:~~~~-~--:~_,.._-;\--:-:--:""'."--:-:-:-~--:~~~-:--:-.....&.-:-~-:--:--:---:"'1 1 01 F' uN-TI6£Rs LINts • ~:;;.~.;;. ·4~ ···· · .. ,.. fllt&H'( .. · · ··· .>.\ ..... '· .. • INCo I. 011113 GARRATT•CALC:AHAN toMPHYJ "0{iil{(,\;':_l~:/:f!'::~~·'·?~V;~L/fS:U th4·•ti·;§Y!%Jt°itW'.t.$Ut:HNni~ith··:::;•. ·~·,};5':~%/~~drt~~:~v~Ad''~~-.;\J:/,;' ,,., ' ;.;:::~:;:.:-&"a ..... ~::.&!:.:: :1-:. : : ~··.~~~:;,;,';.·-~-~· ... ,.";'I )S-·c-fti,.Cd§:nH.nat "L---.• ,.;,,;.J-tr;,,, h~+r '?·~·;.."J.'1" .. -:' ::! T.! f Yf5:tM?KYf'J,Ud:J?~1f·jlii ii itL-Zi ~~· ~.i<.tg•. -.:1 !, -l \•7.f ~-.• ~,, ... _ .. :,7~-~~t-··1JC~~·"~' .. ,.?.•j;.~cn"l,~f, n·<j.:J '• . ... ....... :.;~· PI PE SUPPLIES SHALL HARDWARE ·•IDI ,"' II II -----11 n J:I ll 11 ... 0 IU ., 41 " '--J11 !>II M ~' ,..,~ ...... ;.-...__._ __________ ··-···--·----------~Ji M ~ '''.:'.,,' ' 1 ,;u 19 10 51 12 IJ 14 I~ 16 1l_. ______ . --·· •. -. C. ( ( """ FUND NO \ 1~9 -JT OIS T WORK ING CAP ITAL PROCESSING DATE I 0/111/84 PAG£ ( ( 3 [:~~ ---------------------~ -~--_c~~~-v s ~~-,i ~-!-;-i~-j-!i~ ~~ ~ ~~3-~~ 4 °~~~~E ~~~~~~==~4 ~ : _~ -~--._-___ -. _-__ -__ -_ .. -__ --___ ------=-=] .. . ,, .: WA~~::7~~-· ---HA~VAnm;:::;:s ---------------____ A:_o~~Tstt.33------~ECTRTCA:E:::;:;_;_;_N ____ . _____________ ,__ _ ___ J! ,,. ___ )~t::;. . ... ~~. ~tH;~g~~;~!0[E.1~.:.~;.!~;~---------·----·······-·--------·~~;~-~~~. ~:-~t~-~~~:~;:~~---·-·------·-··-----·------·-··-_ _ ..... _ .. ____ :;1: IP t.i7115li M l'IL SArETY .RrP ANCES co. s2.11 PUMP PARTS II 11 •171151 MITCHELL HANUALSt INC. • S48elt0 SUBSCRIPTION :: .~ 071152 MONTGOMERY LABORATOl\IE'S Slt002e30 AIR SAMPLING '" J· ----·071153 -..... HOR GAt•r CUNr-··co·~·-··utc ~--------------···-----·--sn. 69 EQU I PHENT PARTS.... --------·-···-----II " 071154 MOPLEY TRUCK LINES, INCe . $l5e6~ FR~IGHT :: •~ 071155 MTO~OlAt INC. Sl39•'2 ··,ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES·,,. • -.. -u ·~ --01ns~·------MuNnr-P0\1rirl'RiHHJCTs $677.17 TRUCK PARTS . ·-···------.... --· -·--·-·111 u 071157 MYC:O INDUSTRIES $203.45 SHALL HARDWARE ~:: 11 071158 HYERS TIRE SUPPLY S255e24 TRUCK TIRES 1• " --07n59------mtroNll-PLANT SUWltESt INC. S2lt40hf1 ·.. ..:, .:. COAST SIPHON CLEANING/OIL DlsPOSAL r. ,g c 11 a o cnY oF NEWPOR.T er A ~H · . · . .· . , -·. · o~ c,1r:>~::·:~ :1.:;·f:,: "ATE~ us.EA~E. . .· . <: .. :\· .. · ,/ · .... \ . · . · I~:· 11 .. 071161 . . NOTARY PUBLIC INSURANCE SERVt ·:: . : S32e001-:::··~··':::~~{'\?r~NOTARY BOND FU· <·:,:' ·:.. · j' ~• Z1---lj.'ffi62·--·-···-~·-·-ocCIOENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. S7t300e93 CAUSTIC SODA --------···--· i'I u 071163 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. S39t33Se50 CHLORINE ~ 11 1)71164 ORANGE COAST WINDOW CLEANING S600e00 WINDOW CLEANING ) i\ Trn;s--·------ORANGE VA[vr&FITTJNG co. s2a8.1j6. ~·._ .. >r·~·PIPE SUPPLIES · . . ... : . ._:' ... ··. --•1 1' ::: 0 71166 OVE~HEAD DOOR co Of o~ ANGE CTY ~· .. ,. S1~~· o~<~/\:;;}:~{·;::_,. POQR "~P.M f\S .· .·. '. -.;· ;. . . > ·:\ : .. '. . ·1;: "-~---~11_!~? .. ··-·----~~!~~~-!~Rv1cE .. !:: ·~:,-.:·: _,., ... uaa.92\;J;.:,,;:.t-y:t$;·bEHllRRAGEfSPECJ!LTY-:GASE$".··;·' ... :_,,._ ; ·----·--·-·I' n -t "t'ti168 COUNTY OF ORANGE S26e79 INDEX HAPS n n ~ 071169 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY S2t991e78 REIMBURSE WORKER~' COMP. FUND :•: lll 071170 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. S152e43 SHALL HARDWARE ~o 1 31 ---01a11·-PACIFIC BELL . ''. nlll.86 ~::~ ·)"t .. ~~. 'TELEMETERING . i·· . i1. 071172 PASCAL & LUDWIG · . .~ . ;. .:·-· -S268t5U~H ·.··~~.·:;:··;.:.-, CONTRA~TO~_.P2.·26 , ·;: .. \:,. . . :~ .?t 071173 FERGAHON PRESSt INC. . ;•.,· .• s21s.oo·;.-,;>i~J·; ... S.UBSCft.IPTION; . -: '..·'•.·.:·\ ,. ···--·---------····-II . I• -----··onT74---·-··--·---·--P(RO'iIDATHiN SYSTEM St INC. $14 t319e26 HYDROGEN PE ROX I DE ·~ 1s 071175 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S91)e00 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE :: 1, 071176 MIKE PRLICH & SONS S64t8lt0.05 CONTRACTOR 3-28R 11 11 ""Tfff7r----·· PROGREsmrs-rrn SUPPLY S390e95 STEEL STOCK -=1''1 Ja on 178 PULSAFEEDER $176 .M ~UMP PARTS :: : -----~~1~~~-------------:~-~~~~-1~---~NTE~-N~_!_!_O~~~_!~~~~!_ ________ ..:_ ___ . ---J§~-;~ r:~~~ =-~~~~----, -------·------·-· ·-1~: o 071181 THE REGISHR S359.16 LEGAL ADVERTISING ~~ o 071182 RE"1ARK ABLE PRODUCTS, I NC $21e68 OFF I CE SUPPLIES " II ---n nu3·----·---· -----,.HF.:-RE"POBTrr-soPP1:v--c-o-;-oF CAL 1 F. • 1 Rc·-;-------m~~lf PI PE-sUP"H ru-------· --· -----i··' ;~ ·---mm---. ~m~~~~~~~-~~~~s s~-~~Lv co_.___ -----------:m~H-------mi~~m~~~~P!!_!E_s_____________ ----~ HI IJ71187 SANCON INC. SHl8tG57.00 CONTRACTOR l-2R-2&3 ~:I 071188 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS • Slt797.50 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS "' .,. -·-----· nns9-·· --· ··snlf~1-RoEmJc1r·a. co.---·--·-·---·--··--·--··----·-·---·--·· --,14-;3r, -----·---nou---·---·-----·-·· ·-----~--'"!.... ~L--mm . -m~mr~~~m::~:;_:_____ ------s 2 ;~ii:H-------~m~s~::~:-E~ -------------------------11~i /Q ... ._ .. ·-· ·-------·-.. ---· .. ········-··. -· --. ·---.. ··-···· . . -. ...... -··-··· ... -·· -.. --· ···-····. ········ ..... ,_ ·----·· .. ··· -···-·· -------·-·---··---. -.. -_____ ... , ;··1 ::1 ~'! ! 't .! .. . .... -.. ........ ···-.... ·-... . -· j~ "" FUND NO 91~0 -JT DIST WCRKING CAf ITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/01/84 PAGE 4 1·-···----.·---.. --········· -------·····-·----------COUNTY SANITATION ~ISTRICTS OF ORANGE ~~~~~~ NUMBER AP'+3 ·=-=-~~:~;._..____; __________ ----,1~1'°'! ----· -·-·-·--_. ____ fJill_LPlJ~.-~Q.!gya4 __ -----··-------------·· ·-----·------·-----·--··--------·-·· -- WARR ANT NO• VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ) ::1 ·) ,, -071193--·---SMITH-EHERY-co-;-·-·-s12.-oo TESTING P2-25-2. Pl-26 \ 071194 CHARLES SMITH co., INC. S16le39 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 071195 SOUTHERN C~LIF. EDISON CO. $207 9 310.66 POWER ----1rfIT96--·-··-·-·-·--scr~·-cn:·;··GAS-co;-. -------$33,021.66 NATURAL GAS ·011197 SO. CALIF. WATER co. . S8.97 WATER USEAGE 071198 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL co. Sllt921.16 DIESEL FUEL :~, .~) ·-··------------· ·---····-----1:~ . ---------·"!O II ---07119_9__ s·PARl<LEffSDRINKING WATER S11018.51 · BOTTLED WATER 071200 SUPER CHEM CORP st.oe6.50 SOLVENTS f---o-0712~!._ _____ _!HE_~~PL_IE~---$49737·58. :. ,. tooi..S ·. ·':;·/. -'. ':. II ::1) 071202 ~Y9RON -CASTLE $194.00 LAB MAINTENANCE 071203 TOMARCO $169e43 TOOLS ::1 ~) 071204 TRA~S-AMERICA DELAVALt INC. S215e19 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ---0=1~12os TRA SAHERIC L Alt ~-·. .. : .: . '. ·.-. S342.49 :·· ,:.~-:::~; ~· i: G . . . ·. ·'.-'.>~,·~ , .. ·-,_.~~·;,:;; ·:"._·.· .· ~~ !~_~!-····-----·---_J~A ~~~J~: ~~~-· .___ ' . .. .~'.' ~-~,;:.-.~,--~;~:· \. <;~:·y~;,: ;~~> ·;~:~H:·:::f;~{:~~~?~~:~::~( ii:c;t~hb "··~~P·L·,·~· ·H:li}~·?.fN}~:.:rtt?ti.~·J·:i~.'.· ·-----· 071208 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLYt INC. $885.88 TRUCK PARTS 071209 TUBESALES S530e00 PIPE SUPPLIES 07121~ FRANK ULTIMO S24t165e00 CONTRACTOR PW-116 071211 ULTRASVS E St ; . ·' ' .. ~··/~: .... :,-.> si t135.Q fr:~::~:\~;i,'..\:'.~i S. ' .. J..~. "·-····· ... :: J71212 UNJCO ELECTRiC .·>-.,,.. ·: i._; :~~t>':~f;;~-.~>.'.,\{·i~:•12Hi~::t,.'.~ii;.?.f~:{fJ~ket~ .. l~A~:~~PAt0.: (""") _ _!!..!~.!.~-UNITED PARCEL SCRVICE.; ~. :,· ';•.f;.;.·;.~,(;{..··.grt·.}:·~·::.-··.~ u9.IO:" .• ~·~~~.':ft:·~·~/Hilyuv::si@v1ca·· . -i::. 071214 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP. S500.00 PLANT #1 ELEVATOR HAINTENANCE ~ 071215 UNITED STATES EQUIPMENT co., INC. $865.31 COHPRESSOR PARTS 071216 VWR SCIENTIFIC Slt722.82 LAB SUPPLIES 071217 VALL!"YCTTJES -SUPPLY co. $391+90: ·,:· .. '. VAlU"l~-c---.--:--, '.'."~:;<-,::c~~~~~·,.;!·,. 071218 VALLEY DETROIT DI ES El S252. 8t): :., .:-:) COHPRESSOR PARTS .: ~···. ' ·."',':!>/· ... 071219 VOTO MACHINE siso.oo ;.,'.,:,\;_;:../: -PiP.E SUPPLIES ;~L-:!;· '· /r/.\·', ----071220-·----·· WAUKESHA ENGINE-SEPVICENTER S2t't67e71 ENGINE PARTS 071221 WESTCO~ST ROTORt INC. Sl1061e06 PUHP PARTS 071222 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP S2t278.80 'ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 11 ~:1 ·) l' ·----.), Jal ) 19 . 140 II 111 0 ) ti 4\ .,, II ') II -----C71223 WHITE; FINE & VlRVILLE seo1.03 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 07122't w I LSON FORD SALES . $75. 26. TRUC I< PAkTS . ,L. ' • . 071225 WOLOER ENGINEERING, INC· s21,q93.12 CONTRAttoR PW-122 .. ) -----if'H226 ___ ----···-··xEROX CORP.----$413. 35 XEROX REPRODUCTION 071227 Y -TIRf. $1,532.29 TRUCK TIRES ---------------------------·--.. --- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/03/84 $113361743.63 ---------------------------------- --·-·· ---------- ·---··-· .... ---·--------·------.. ---··---·-···----------- ( .. ( ~, ~ 1:: 151 &l -· -----------------... ., ( 1 "6 I "I·-- . --···----·--1·': .. : .. l1 v •' : ·i •,.; ...... :/L: .. !:r ( ( ( __.---.--FUNO._NO-.. 9.199. ---=-·-_JLD.lS.I _WORK 1.N.L.CAP I TAI -· --------------.&-P.B..O.kµilN G DATE l Oto I /Sit PAu ;a , REPORT NUHBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . --·-·---... -----·-------·----·-···--·---CLA ~S.-P-AlJl_--l.O,l.QJ/84-___________ ._, ---------. ·----··-··-... ·----·--·--' ! I ;wnnAIU. ----AHQllNJ ... \ .. · --f 10 ---#LOeER .FUND------------------$ ih...,..J2.J .. -9 ----·----11 II #2 OPER FUND 776. 88 :: II #2 ACO FUND . 451. 74 I\ 11 --#.J-.OPEfl-EUND " I] #3 ACO FUND 67. 96~. 05 ' 11 13 F/R FUND 70;,~7.68 {. ;: .. : .. ; .. . ., , .. IS ---#5.-0.P-.ER ... .F..UND-----------. 56.59 ; : .. "!··'"" :'."'•:•• '.·.' . .',:;, '.' " #6 OPER FUND 29.76 II 17 OPER FUND 3,203.43 II ___ ,.J_f /A-£UND.. 3 0 I 8 8 u :~ __ JH ~ ~H :~~~~:a_ · ._. · · .·. / 2 ; ~ m: ~i .s.r.i~¥.J;:;1'.i.~~l~-tf N m·'.·i;f ~F: : :-':;;,;'.:; fl;::);\f ~t:~,.,h~~:. . , . ~ #6&7 OPER FUND 84.74 ~ JT OPER FUND ~06,780.81 '1 .Rf ~ " -~ ~ ~ ~o ~~ ~: ~ D c~~ ~ m 5 ;u~g" p • I NS u RAlltr f u D ·, ' ' ' : ," {"': ::'' . ' ' A: nt·: h\i.~.J~J:i~§~;i~~:f '.;;;!'i}::~;~if \~'.&.~;Ht:~(~:~·:r ;i.&t-'!~.·c:· : I~ 111' ·"·" l~ 1· -~ ill-'"! IS I& II '.I l'I ·----------·--·---··-····---···· -·-··-_ .. __ .;. __ ,:~ ·O ~ ~~ ,, w '-"1 :1 _ ..... ____ ---··--·--·-· ---·---------·--------··----·-·---------·---- -----~------ J I '! ---·- ~j '" " r,;w lu 1 1.6 r.1 r.1 •·I IC 111\J '·' ;·• . l::.'.i• .,J • l ~ D NO _9199 .... n OTST UORK 1 N(.; ~A~ PRnrr:-s~ INC. OATF 1 n_L ------ WARRANT NO. VENDOR REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . CLAIMS PUb 10117184---------- AMOUNT DESCRIPTION .. ··1 ·) ~1 · .. ; 071249 A-ABLE CESSPOOL SERVICE S2 t400e0~ CSDOC. 17 HAN~OLE REPAIR$ , , 1 1~1,..') 071250 AIR CALIFORNIA · .... · . S3T6.00 .. AIR FAR£ . . i ~· · ·11 I 01125 UR-PROD11 CTS & CtUMICALh iNC. hoa.u .• ,.,,, &P&-C-4~GA&&C" '·. ' ll ·---'13 071252 ALL MAKES OFFICE MACHINE CO. S46el3 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS ~-~~~~~:. _____ _::g:~:NI~~~HNICAL SUPPLY ' sg:!i~5 ~:~~:T SUPPLIES 1 _____ ·------i:;; . 071255 ANAHEIM SAU SHOP INC. . .·: : .·.·. ·:·: .. ·.:... .~46,00 :. ,;".·:·· .TOOJ..S . . , ... · . , ~· ~1 ''1'1 ::1 •') 071256 THE ANCHOR PACK ~NG. c~.. .:_:;:);~.'.·i.'. ;.':_P; '. :.,: .; .. ,;; •.·~ .• 1-~ .... 1._,;.~~~",!:';l.;.;f l .. · PH t! S.~· ·.~t~;:~: .. ~;~t;·~·~ .. :_. p I PE . supp~. ES . '.· . ::1:,'._ ... v.:~ ._:.\:~:-r .. ·_:.; __ ... f\\~·'·""' · ... ·; '. ., I 021.2.57 ~Q yAI VE-& :·.··~·:· ).,,,;.(•}'· ,., .. ,., ... ,,.. .. :.v .... ··:-1· • <·.:·;' ., ' :•;,,:.·.~·''"">-";.\'.:·;:~·· . El' ... ":·. r :: ...... ~·s-;i>·, .. ~ .. ,~··1··.-91•··~· ! ••. . --·-··----~ 071258 AQUA BEN CORP. S29t170.95 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS »l·J 071259 ARROW-RISCO, INC. ' S78.86 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES " · 1----.D..ll.2..60 BC INDllSJRJAI SllPPI Y,. ~~~,, .. ,, .1l ,_... . .• ,, .. ~'" ~ "'\"'•' ... _ ~~O • 34 .. , .. r1, .,,.tn &MAL.I. MARP\i#ARi .. ~··· . ''f.·· ."' s .·,. ;: 071261 BAKER [QU IPHtNt R~Nl'.~l~·'.;;{}i,:.~:1";1·: J_il;.J,:i:::~n}·;'i~·:.~(J-. .. :r~·:~}·~·:· ·~!~ H::';~\:-l·~··b~~~i~· .QUI PttENT. 8ENTA~ . ~.;p~,·~·1 ·~~\~.~;;>: ;'."~·. ..·. .... jHI ·') 071262 HILARY BAKER . -: ... ~;.(:~ ... ~~~~~'!;,,\;.:.-.-~· ·.r"·~,_ ..... ,~. ;tl. ·;f{~--17,.aa: ~fi:·i ·;.-r;~ttMHOYU· Mi'LEAQE.: .1.~>}l.'.~···;·~ti:.c.:;if.~,':_;,. ';'.,,·:. . "11 • l'. ~ 071 . .. , '"' ·.'.'. ~ . . -!'.,. " ~·>:r:.' ... .-. " .. S. ,I' •11., ••• , , -•;'";°• · .. ;.. ;.~J&')-• t'"f•';'.;l1~ .. -., .•• :!•:~·" : 071264 · BECKMAN INDUSTRIAL S1t544e59 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 071265 BECKMAN INDUSTRIAL s1so.oo ELECTRICAL REPAIRS :10 ;_ \0--· .. ... . '...... .1" a .'8U"ll"KU ~U9' rl'K.U .. , n. .. . 071267 :: 071268 ~1269 BIG· BOX RENTAL COe' .-..... :f·--..;;-;,·iiSf!Rlft"'•-n-~P?":"na·"'!iE:!l5"·-IU88Ei1'00·:S:· I 071270 BISHOP GRAPICS S593e81 DRAFTING SUPPLIES ll :1 .) ~ 071271 BLACK & DECKER MFG. CO. S46e00 SMALL HARDWARE I ~ :~ ! ~~~ =~~~· 0 mo~~R=AT ~111 Al.II '.•'; !Y' ., ~y, A;'.: .. ; '' ~.{;'jSi~,( : it~:: UsH'SJi·~ m w~ a, K~T~ MA~~ ;,;/:~; .Li:,,'.~k {:, •. ; • . . . .. ·===l· . . ~ :; 0 71274 BREN,.ER-F I ~LOE R ... -~ ~$~~:u·~ h .t:~\:-·:\1t~~'i' .·:0 ~·~:~i·~~;{:'~J:~~1~ .. Z·1 f. ,~, ~n,itjl'_f,'j~(\'#\ .•. f . ~-~~I.. v ~ •: -·,'i::' ·,~":·1t'.'/'~?-: :H~·~:! ~ 1[J~~;)i~i:j::·tJ~;.:· '. ., :-.:'.;• . ' ·. . .' . ' .. '.::I ) .-... • " ·.:..~~~:~~·~"i(f•,.,,,,.. .. !~t -~-;~:".~'j'" ~ ..... ~~i.·f' .. ~~· .".1..-:•·~:-;' .. t ·\.':.~)ii::•"<~~·\'!·:.!\·· '.' i fA \ii-!1_!;~' ~ ~· . ·~ ··'";.r~t'-\.l· .... t . .1;t· .4Jt-•'..,• , .:rt' .... ~t ... r .... r. /s.·~~--1' ·.' . -·· .... -.. tS 071276 BUCKEYE GAS PRODUCTS sa.e2 PROPANE 071277 C & R RECONDITIONING CO. S390e00 PUHP PARTS 1:~1 J a .c.e.r CO! (EORNU 1 INC. ..·· ·. . . $36.14 . _. .WORD. PROCESSING $UPPLt.E$ ... _, .. 071279 cs COMPANY · ·: . -· .·. ·:_;:; ,_:J '.. flt6H.U . : ",·'", VALVES -· . . . . ".':; ·'.:·~·'..:·~·"_,. ,:· 0112eo cARLsoN MACHINE co. . . . . .· . -~ .'· .. · ,'.·.-~/, --• 11!$2.c.o .: -:./~ ·M;_p1MTLE c11A1N ·.. .·.;--!t~< · :·;-x;;::f I 01.1281 ,JOHN CAROii 0 [NGJNE[ftfl.':. ~".-;._ t:.. /; .. -~·· "·'; '.': ·:. h•J5Ae5f'. '"'• -?·!'':•. ENGR P2;;2S,,;2 ·"~".~c.:-.•:"· :.·«· >": ' 071282 CASTLE CONTROLSt INC• S264e53 VALVES 11 ~I·) ul u1 \4 071283 CHESTERTON LOS ANGELES S400.23 TOOLS U' I 071.2.BL-. CHEVRON u.s.A., INC. .13.610.70 ENGINE OIL ·=3':~ 071285 WILLIAM Ne CLARKE $338e71 TRAVEL ~XPENSES. !ill :·1 071286 COMPRESSOR & INDUSTRIAL S845e00 COMPRESSOR PARTS · !.9 .. 1 on291 ---CDo.ncK cnH2AN _ us.11 awt-0-1N.Q-MAT&R1A4:----: 071288 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. S19.82 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES v 071289 CONSOLI DA TEO R EPROD UC Tl ONS S3t50 2 • 96 BLUE PR I NT REPRODUCTION :~I _l 1---ou29a_ _______ t.ON.I.IN.EN..ll.LCHEHICA• en u,s31.30 GH-LOR~-E---____ .. ____ ·~ ~~~~:~ ~~~~:.~E~~:~G~A~~:~~~ES S7 :~:~::! ~=~~:/~::~:~ ENG I NE REPAIRS j~;I · l o~i;;;--· ----~~~tr·:~~~~1 :;N~:~-!!~:::: ·-~::~~ :~fr'!L __ .__ _ ----~.-~·-·--=· _J-.i . -------·--··------. -----·--·----· ------f ~"' ~---·· I ------·-·-- ( 4'1 • ( ( IJ ' ~ 4, ( ( ( .UND-N0---!1.1-99-~-JT DIST UORKING-CAPITAL PRO.U.SUNl.J LI"''" 1u·1~nn "'""" "' , • . REPORT NUMBER AP~3 · COUNTY SANITATION DiSTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . --------------·----------------CLAIMS PAID 10/ll.#-<IBD.14------------- WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DES CR I.PT ION 071295 MR. CRANE S476e00 CRANE RENTAL -··-----··- 1, _,,..., J s I .. !!II - 071296 CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER . S251.05 · ~ATER SOFTE~~R ~ENTAL .__ __ 07-1291. -------·--· .Sl.A.T-E-O~CALIFORNIA UtOO.OO CSHC 15 MANHOLE REPAIRS -------- 071298 D.A.T.A•t INC. S83.74 PUBLICATION 071299 DAILY PILOT . s20.oo LEGAL ADVERTISING .071300. ----···--.--DA-lA-t...RANse..oru.u..wN-1~..+--l.lll:C.-----...,..._----.,....-~~~~---_.~~~A-J~~---------...---------I 071301 DAYTON FOUNDRY . " .. Sl•1~7e87 PINH-~ CHAI". . . !81 ..... , 071302 DECO ··-·. ·' :.: $U335e98 . . · ~-,. ELECTIU~Al SUPPL lE$ ,,, gj~g: ~~~:A~~~:~~~R 0::RVJCES ... ~ '··. ·r,~:·-: ~1:~::::: ·': . ~~:I s~~=~~~:R ~~I ~~~~ANCE 071305 DORADO ENTERPRISESt INC. S39t500.00 PLANT #2 BASIN REPAIRS, PW-128 REPAIRS ~, .. Hi:: 149 $4 $$ H :::: :L ::- 071.lUf 071308 011309 071310 071311 1 071313 0713H 071.:>J.b 071317 ..._ ______ --------·--·-·--- ~~ .,, .,. !nl ·~ .,) -----·-···-... I IGI 161 16) "' lo\ I r.i;; &I ... ··--.. ---· -------·" 10 111 '- ----------------------------·-·-·· ---~-------!:~ ::1 • I~ -----·· ··---------·--~--------------~---·-···-,·-·-·-. .•. .J • "' 9199 -.11 DIST MORKJNG CAPITAL PROCESSINt: nn'° tnlt?/Aa. DAt:'° ~ 'Ir) J , REPORT NUMBER AP43 . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ----------CLAIMS PUD Ud . WARR ANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION :1 r; ) 071341 0 71342 ---.. ----.. ~ -c -•. 1 01no.3--LARRY'S BLDG. MUERUi.s; ue. ,. · ., sto.u '"" n•NG HAue111 s . 1 C71344 LAURSEN COLOR LAB 071345 LEWCO ELECTRIC co. S54e06 S717e06 FILH PROCESSING ELECTRIC CART PARTS ) -1L1-l.M6--''GHTING ois1.a..um1ou, INC, , S21D55,3D. flfJ:J~qr;a• s 11 ee1ns 1 071347 LILLY TYPESETTING 071348 KeP~ LINDSTROMt iNC• 071350 071351 071353 071354 071356 071357 .... 071359 . t:3 071360 HALCOM PIRNIEt INC. "ARVAC ELECTRONICS \.ll 071362 HORGAN EQUIPMENT CO. . S221e37 VALVES ::: 071363 MOTOR RIM & WHEEL SERVICE S549e32 TRUCK PARTS t.4 MYl="R~ ITRI=" ~llPPI Y ______ UI-~~ TRUCK Tl RES 011365 NATEL , co..... · . , .. >~·;-,:•·:·.··:_~::_:'.:>r-~.E-;g·}~·~rJ:.f:).~,:11¥;~~;~;lr+1!·1?,~•1tz~;~~~1~f.liE~£rtioNi .. ivs.TE1t-,-Q-.M'L~iAijt$:~-.;_'.;.h;. -. 071366 NAT~O~AL ELECTRJ~ ~oi.k::·,{':'(";,.~':\ :-x~.~::::~.'n~::'i~;;~~~~~··t'\. ·':~A,t0$•13:;·~~t7r:~·~·;·-;:~ ~~E~"'' tAl'.~.f!J"ruu-::~~f~:.hii~/Y;r.if~Y -; ,;;:. ' 011~ .. ··_;.-·,,','~!!~.-:··. ',41 ••!,...: ... '°'-c"':'\.~~··~\.~··*h"t•"•lr;.:;•• ~·.... • 'ff-'~ ~ .. l:··-.•.... ~ :'":.y._·~ .. -~:.·~ .. ~·~,_ ... l.t.e::-r··;:'ft!~'~)!!~*:~' ... ~(.-~~::·-; • ,. ) 071368 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. S6t631e99 CAUSTIC SODA "I ") 071369 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. S20t529e16 CHLORINE 41 •• I O 7 L3.1.JL___ . , _ _ . _ . :: 071371 ORANGE VALVE & fITTtNG co. . ._ S539~6i _ ... PIPE SUPPLIES ---~ii~~ g:~!~~ ~~=:ICE ' , .• '_:. :, '·.::·:;:.·?-..:·,!f=t:!r>·:-~}::(:};; .. :tr:.:~'~h!U.u 071374 CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTROLR S73t020e00 COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES 071375 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY $41937.58 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND __ A113.IL----PS I -sz,935. 04 pnRTABI E EQll I PH ENT . 071377 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. S77e05 SAFETY SUPPLiES 071378 PACIFIC SEWER EQUIPet INC. S487e29 SHALL HARDWARE I 011.n9 _________ JW:1uu.c1L.2.Aen peni111c1s u • o9A. oo tAtu roR u1 suee• 1 ES 0713eO PITNEY BOWES $89.04 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 071381 POLYSONICSt INC S350.00 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i----A11382.._. __ ·--·--HAROLD PR I MRQ.SL-UE _s3Q.-_OQ lNDUS_J.RI Al WAST.L.SAHll.lllG__._.I c_e ___ _ 071383 RAINBOY DISPOSAL co. $33~.oo TRASH DISPOSAL •.o ' 511 ) :~1 5.tl . 55 J ~~j·::·· :1:) -ro11 51 --------~' _) _ __ 1 1·;~ .r" I :.m:__ ... ___ . ____ .. ______ ::!~~~£~.~~~~-~ S YSTEHS s~::: :: l:.~~~E~_:~~1aE I ON COMPUTER P~-~~-~-~~~-·-~.~. _ 1: 071386 THE REGISTER $757.68 LEGAL ADVERTISING .......... ,.________ --·-··---------------------------------------------·--··-·--------·-------------------------------· -c ··~· ··-· ·---··-----------------··-···--·-··------··· ---··--______ .. _________ -----·-·-··----·------·------------·---h·-·-------------· ( ( 11 ;;j1v :: . to ~) ( ( ( PROC&SSIN ... No_.N0----9-1.9.9---J.T-DlS.l-\UUU<ING CAPITAL REPORT NUMBER AP43 ,rr-a-- "APRANT NO. VENDOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Cl At MS PAI D--1u.O ~11~1~1:..oa ...... O-----· AMOUNT OESCR IPTION 071387 REPUBLIC ENGINES S103e46 ENGINE PARTS 071388 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO.·OF qALIF ••. INCi S446e22 PIPE $VPP~IES ... ---. ·-------4 11! J ..... I Oll38.9_. _____ JlQ88UlS-& MEYERS . . . $lt2691 u PllMJLJ!.A,-RT-S--------------· 10 071390 ROCCO•s TRUCK "RECKING S689.00 TRUCK PARTS II 071391 ROSEMOUNT, INC. · S9e71 FREIGHT 11 IJ ll.392 ROSEMOllNI/l!Nll nc $1 tU6 eU fl FCTIU CAI SUPPi I ES 071393 RYAN-HERCO .. ' . ' ' S1'i95.. ·. · .. FREIGHT ! . . .· , ' II ''· ~ " IS 071394 SAND DOLLAR ~USINE~. ~·~ .. ::.·;·•582•6~)>~.:/:f/ .}i·.'.>FORH PAi~tJNG. :" ·!):h:·· I 011~ : · · ., ··.~"!'I.--. • , . · "·"··"'·"· · 071396 SANTA ANA DODGE S95.85 TRUCK PARTS 071397 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS S163.13 ELECTRIC MOTOR 071399 SHAMRO~K. SUP~i. Y ... , ,:;· .. :·1·.:: ·:::~:>t~t1 .;:~<-:.'.'{:;~,~:.t:/~-:.~f;·~t;~l;_/t"'.tt~9' 071400 E. At SILZLt ~Q.• j .-.lNC. .. · .;: ."i:'".~.:~~J·""·:-.',,·>.: :+:~'.'~:Y·'.;;;_:t:':~!:cl\~';$! t~i' t 011AJl · . . . ..-..·.:·:.·,_.~; .. •-..... , ,.1 ...... 1 ... ~·-""' .... ;. 071402 SOUTH COAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT S121.90 071403 so. CALIF. COASTAL VATER RESEARCH PROJECT S3t~18e00 DISPOSAL STUDY z• : ~ ~! ~m · i~i:~~~!s ~:~;~a;E~:;,:1~;~.:~:;S~~~W,£fa~~W~.~~l;~J,~;i!?; ;i t~i~~~~tt!m;~,~.m -~ , .•.c::i;r£;;,§nWlf ~/}f; • ···• ... · I 0714G8 SWEETLAND CO. S153e30 PIPE SUPPLIES -~ 071409 SY BRON -CASTLE 03• 03 LAB SUPPLIES ::: I 07 1 A1fl . ' . ' ' ' . ' . ' ' . ' ' ' . . 4q 071411 TAK TAKAMINE ' : .~<::·:::.:.:;·::--./';.~::_., .. 1 .' •• \~-:r)._:~~:.<~,(~~~,-~;fh~ag' oacj !."~·~A:~~·.-£-r.~.> PlANT)tAtNT~NA"C~/houtti>,KEEPIHG · . :; • ~-~ ~· ~ ~:('.,~ ·~··'•~~·s.:<:.·::fi<.;~~·.~!..;!·..J~:~::••., ~ r• • '• :·:~_~;~~.~·:~-~-:\:'•I,..~•·~•• -. -' •' '" ' '. ';>? •.\.~<·· . .'~".;.;.,~_,"". ~.:' }'•',_ ) ·•_, I D2.1AU CHANNn · ..... ····' · ~ .. -.··::·.\:;;,.;...-.'t;i2., -; • ...,"!';·.,,.:h.'. ·;;;:,~ .. ·.·--:-·.. -.;t~c» •.• :-.--l1f,;.• · ~_:•.:;.<'··•··· \-.f~:;.,-,.,,, ,·. .. · , .. 071412 THOMAS BROS, MAP$.... , · _., _ .. ._,i. ,. ........ -1 ~ .:•:.:.L~·.t.'•;:;V : :.·> :, ~1 ~,.~.:~;,:.;-;:,~.:; .. ti:,: ~~AFT.I ~Q ,., q ~--:·'·-.. '.·:··~.r:.-·:.'::'f··.'.;_·;;~r.: .. ':-, ~·. , -1. , . u 07141" TICOR TITLE INSURANCE . sns.oo 7-8 TITLE FEE ::! 31 l9 cu .. 41 0 ~ ., •• ., 011415 TRANSAMERICA DELEVALt INC. S7ti98.88 ENG I NE PARTS ., ~ TRAN SM AT T n N. T •• ~ • • • I: n I:' I I:',. TD I ,. A I r II DD I I I:' r Cl 071417 TRAVEL TRAVEL ' $250 00 AiR FARE . ,. '".,;;· '. . 'I~:, 071418 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLYt INC• ".;. ·~·5'2 28 TRV~K PARTS' : ·"'~ ... :·' >'it:·' : SI 1----D..l.lU.9 .l • .G.&.JllCKER & SON,' INC· ' . ' U39 QA El fCTR I CAL.S.Jlt!I I ES ·-· S1 071420 UNICO ELECTRIC S2t09l.32 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS ~ 071421 UNION OIL CO. OF CALIF. $135.21 GASOLINE ~· \ ~--07.1'122.. UNlSlRUL.l.OS ANGEi ES U2e 01 -SHAll-HAllnwAJl --------·----·--,-···---•,G 071423 UNfTED PARCEL SERvjcE s10~.77 DELIVERY SERVICE ~ 071424 V"R SCIENTIFIC S3t689.43 LAB SUPPLIES j'·' "' _Jl1.U25__. _____ yAI I EY CITIES supply en, S.2....3!.LJ.3 VALV.£.S.,_..!ilLS.U2.e.LU$___ ------fO 071426 YAM NOSTRAND REINHOLD $79.24 PUBLICATION : 071427 JOHN Re WAPLES. Sl+30.60 ODOR CONSULTANT r.1 I 01.u2a _____ ___tAaLWARR£.N & co._ 300.00 1 LAUU.TY Cl AIMLAD!UJU.SJJlAI.OAS -·-·---·-----"' 071429 "AUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER · $20.51 ENGINE PARTS =]~: 071430 "ESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP $362.09 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ~ I 07l 431_ ____ . ___ IHOltA8-L._J1UlODRUFF. INC, S151590, 30 _I.RAV..fLEXllBll5._.-.-LE.GALS.EalUC.ES ----·--· -·-~· 071432 XEROX CORP. S1t085.29 XEROX REPRODUCTION : ·~--·-· ... -·---· -.... ----·· --------·-.... 111 ' ,, -------··------------11 i'.~I 4 ·-----------------------------·----···----·-···· ...-, D NO 91 _99 -JI DIST WORIUN_G__C.APITAI PROCESSING DATE 10/12/811 PAGE 5 ~ REPORT NUMBER AP~3 ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 11 fl Cl ATMS Plt.n_t n/t7/A.t. WARRANT NO. VENDOR AH OUN T DESCRIPTION ') 071~33 Y -TIRE $326.92 TRUCK TIRES 071~3~ GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES SH0.31 . VALVES ' , I 01..1.li35 ZIP TEJU!.OJURY PERSONNE 6B•·'l TEMPORAP.-¥-~WL~~~~~~~-·~~~~~~--~~--; =========:======= ::10 10 ,, -----1 -' ',..,.~": ;.7 · • -, ~·· '!";..~·.;\· ·.~···li!·~··.L~.·::!ff\ -f'""u"' " .... ,~.t .... ;~;;i.-.. / ... ,r •·.-;.·~-·>.~j~~ .. ;~· ... !.;.· • ~-_ ~ :.~~ •. _.},: n:~-~ J «• urJ,;.D runu ·-·· "'--~··-•-r-~••·v1 ;.."---" ·. -'"<. ;-"~"'c,-..,..ir "·jf.fttio ' ·~T.&:"'·I .t rtytyYz · ... 4g s •1 s01 y -,.·rH ~'-T1 ",. .. -,.o -p -.,-.• , .. •·· -..... n,,·-·-·~-"' --------1 #2 OPER FUND 4,584.67 #2 ACO FUND 1,870 .10 I i ~ ~' ~ / ~~ ~ D 1' ; .-,. ' •, • '.1~/ .. ''-• '" ;.r :, ~ ·'f }'~ ·· '. •' · ·-~·{'." 1 •• 'i·\ · ··'/ • 9 1 72; : 1 1 .'!-. :11 ·~~;. -~~-y·:•: •. · ··~~,-:;µ._:, ~-· i~'•·f'f :: 't;,:: Jfj/;;'.'l'fi''.":h ·.' .. ~· ' #3 ACO FUND . "' ·, ' ' :.;,..-.,l· ;,. . ' . ' ., ..... ,: ':I.~<-''' '83~ '> -~·::,!:;-', ;· ,.-i-~ '~'°';.>V .• ~~t"';·.fn,;-: .. "--_•••:, .• :,-~ ...... ~ •. , .,., l" • -· it ,o'...•~!:1 1' ~#·~1 .~' · .."'~ ' ... _··_ ~, ... \ :\: ~--,1;:. ' ' 1 •: \ >~)~.11"· 'f. 1.~t ... , -: (· "..;fff'.,·' '.11J~t: ~ r . _;.1·, .. ~.lh . ~"~· . · ~~J;r -7~ ~~ ~· I-1 .~ Q ER UN •t L ./!.' .. 1·--·~··:,..._•·'"'~'".:)~~-<1:.',"" ~· .... !.';,Vit"":~~'\...-~'"'11 -,JJ\~ .r,!!-tt'• ... ; -" • -:"-_,.•; ... ._...._t '!4-1""'·;. il '.11.:--. .. i..._· • .:' -r. 1 OPER FUND 52 .80 OPER FUND 5 ,755.35 ~ ~ F R FUND 1 80 .81 #11 OPER FUND ·.. · -.-· ... ·,q;1,; .-... ,,• '~ , .. ,, : 5, I .02 ,'"!'" -~ t'"''.;.:i-'.-" ,,-;~·.·,;. ·n •,:·: -, ·' ' ~ , #13 ACO FUND ' --' I' '··. • .. '{ -~· .. :.-·-I J.: .: 842 79 ,:,.~t ... / ..• , I ·~·-_·;·.~·-·'" ~ .,..,·'.-... 1•-,· ' r J • .:. -~-· i. ··~ · _. ·: • _ ''. (~·· · • • ' ~--· ·· l''>'"!;" .... -:t·•· •,:.• ...... ; -• ;· ~..-.•.i1.:r.·'·l:"': .. ha·. . . ,. ~---·-'~6~&~7~0~~1L E!!.ND • •.,_~"-._ :_ .. h~ .. ~< :;;.·,1\-"; ·,, ~.:•'f\l'e', 390.00 1" ~ '\J,:f.r9, _";·;;~~, r:.··:-~t~!!~:.:~~-.. • .. :{:,).-;,_>,.!,_"'n~li;,,(.•"'-· .. ,_'.~ JT OPER FUND 292, 381 . 34 , CORF 233, 308. 99 :,1 J 1 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS I NSURANCE FUND SELF FUNDED WORKERS ' COHP. INSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND n' IOI " TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/17/84 " $632,416 .48 .. I ~I .) " ul ~I J '" -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------" " :1 ) co " ,,1--------------·----------· -------------------------------------------------"T"'-------------------·~------< " I~ ,, •• " --·---· ---------·----~ '·' 1-----------.,._ -·· --·-----·----.. --j'\.,j ~ --J:::. " .. \I l• " -- " 'I --···-·----· --·--·· .. -·-------------·-----· ...) . ( ( ( ,.,. ~r-TUNO No--. ·-·-91119--;_--\JT"""ITTST VORK JNG""C APJTu--·---···----·----·--------PROC"[S"S"JNrDTirTlrT2""5T81r-PA-.;r--:-Y ~·-----~-----.I'': 1I . REPORT NUMBER AP'l3 ; ,. COUNTY SANITATION DJSTIHCTS OF OR~NGE COUN!Y_ ------······-·-· .. __________ --·--·---· -·· ···-·····. ·-·-·---______ _j.: . --··-·------·· · ·-cruMs··run-1nn11A4------------·· --]1~1,- !:I WAPRANT NO. VfNOOR AMOUNT • ~_!:~~!-~~!_ION _______ ~· r-----·----·-~. . .. --·-----·-·· --·--·--·-----··-··-----------·--., :1 07H50 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES1 INC• $27.56 "LAB "SUPPLIES :~1r , 071451 ADVANCE ELECTRICAL SALESt INC. • S60e28 ELECTfUCAL SUPPLIES·.:.:.:_· _ _:._ __ · ________________ ----·----u 10[_--117 l'i52 ------·· --1lUVANcru-cFF1cr··srRVTtFs--------------"Tin;-u;--· OFF·I CE SUPPL, Es 1 :: 11 (171453 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTC\RS1 INC. $2341tl77e51 CONTRACTOR P2-25.-2, PW-097.. 1~,,,. 11 11714511 ~JR PRODUCTS & CHEHICALSt INC. S51638.50 ENGINE PARTS ·--------·------" 111·-·---u1Hss-. AIRCO INDUSTRIAL c;ua-------·-----·-----·---u6-s-;-19 LAB SUPPLIES 1:' 1.! U7H56 ALL-STATE VEHJCLfSt INC. Slt~98.10 , ,., VEHIClE ·LEASING . • j1:1 ·· .~'I 011457 ALLEN ELECTRIC co. . ··s2h~68•97 ... ··;··;_. ·:,!\coNTRACToR·Pw-118 . __________________ : ___ ."' · ·~ ·-·-.,7145g-·--····----·-unro-sUPPl'r-Clr."" st"'Sll.63 PIPE SUPPLIES :; ., !171459 AHfRJCAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS S222e42 LAB SUPPLIES nl~ ::~-----g~ :~i-----------~~~~~~~R-PJmrrNG co. H:::i~ . ;"_~ ... · ··s ~~~~ E~A:~:P~ -1-~~ .• , : :.:, _. -·. : ~ lo 071't62 ANGELICA RENTAL SERY~CES . , :.~ ·-·~ ." ... '., ~11~.•l\~ i::,.~ti·'.-:_::;,;~ \~•1;-T~WEL .~ENJAL : ~:b~".«·~}·t:l.;frJ.,,::"·.~,, 11 071'+63 AQUA BEN CORP. ..:·· _:'..·. ~ .. : .. ·.-·-,. 1. ;:~';"."}·1i{· 1 •14t831~1~~·i?;'1f.ti~:,~h'(,:iCHEKICAL"COAGULAN1$f~-~~·}:~:~&wti'.:~.;·f.11 1/.· 11 ---IT7H"Eilf"-. -·. ··----·lcwnn:-c"ElfITW--n4. 00 LAB SUPPL I ES n n71465 ARCO GLASS & MIRROR Stl.93 GLASS !61 .. ,,,.. 11, .. " H 111_ .. ~ 071466 ARROV-RISCOt INC. S357.97 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES » ;~ t"lf6r R~LPH u. AIKINSON . : .. ·:~.··> ..... : -~ .. >·::::,:.;·;:.-:;."~~·3't."\~~~-i1f~f'~j~;:~~PUHe PARTS'·_ : 'b:::;;~~~i?,~~1:-<\~~~::',·}J;.·:'>.: ....•. ::1. )1, - 2, il71468 AUTOMATED DEBURRJNG SJJPPLy. ~ ·: . · ·, .. ~<'i":·< •/'.< ··::0-92~~1 ~·\·:<]:f~'··'li,';.:J~Af~TY . .-GLAO . ·,'.:(;';:.~.:>.n"'.''~t{·\;'i;,_,-.,. . . . . · · .... n • 11 ·~-rnr1nrr-·-----···--13r.r.soN"-sirmr&liR.AYE Lt INC.. . BU I LD I NG MATERIALS JI n I 071471 BER TECH '48.92 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES :1< lQ ~ 071472 ALUE DIAMOND HAHRULS S72.06 BUILDING MATERIALS co ~· .. --::-1rn-qn--BRnmLR-;;FTttDER g Assoc.,. INC.. . . . .. . . _$206.08 :·.! .. %~:'.~(-.. COHPRESS~R PARTS ' _..' <·~-'·. ;' .. . . :; -~ (l7147't BRITHINEE ELECTRIC . : ~~tlU.31 '\~:-;~:.:·:;,t;.~. HOT9il REPAIRS . \:;,:, . . :. ol", jJ 071475 THE BURKE COMPANY • . ., . ...-, ·:~:··:..; .:· f73~ t• ;~::,::~-f:t.t//ni.\·U: LU,!:!BER . . _ . ', ., , .. ~ .. · ·-·-,---·--·-·---·1 14 1• ·---· --·nn76 --··· .. ·-------cl'IC~TifURNTl.ITilC. SS9'15. 70 WORD PROCESS I NG REPAIRS ::,, .. n t71477 CS COMPANY Slt~27e83 VALVES 1~ fl71"78 C"PCA REGISTRATION S975.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATl.~O...;..;N ____ _...,_"K __ ~-....- 11 ---·1171479-·-·· ···--·--··-aoRrn"R"OO:U-"[WGTNEERS -86t61U.10 ENGR. ENERGY TASK FORCE, p2;..~6, p2-28, Pl-21 o. ·-.. , 11 n ~71480 CENTURY SERVICE CO. S2t968.00 SHALL HARDWARE "°~ . ~· n 071481 CHRYSLER CO~P• S56e17 USE CHARGE OVERPAY~H=EN~T~·~-~---~~-, en ·-·-nnar ........ '. ----coosr· F1RE'-[QUJPMr.Nr-··-··---·--------··-------""111e·;55 Fi RE EXTI NGUTSHER -HAI NTENANCE ·-·---~ --·------~~l u f~71483 COAST R£ACY MIX $159.14 BUILDING MATERIALS 11• C71'f 84 'co JT DRAPERY SERVI c E Sli97. 00 DRAPERY c LEAN I NG lo~---t171485 ___________ COMPROSOR & I NOUS IR IAL ERlITffrS"U'PPLY. I NC-. ··-s"5lflr."DO-COHPiEssoiC°PARTS iu 071486 C:ONROCK COMP~NY S268e50 BUILDING MATERIALS u 071'187 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. S2,6'11.llf ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -··---·----·-··· 46 -··an 4BB coNc:ct 1~1ro R ~PRooccnnNs-· ·---· -----·--·-----· ---···n;-~41; l>r··------iLUEPRi NT .. REPRODUCT fi)N ______ _ u n7l489 CO~TINENTAL TESTING i INSPECT. $313.50 RADIOGRAPHIC INSPECTION •R~ 071490 CONTROLCO Sl t31f3. 8/l _ -~Q~J~QL.!~HU.!''1.!JH ----·--·--·-----·------:, -----"Q71491-----·coOPFP ENr.RGY-·srnvtcrs-------·---· .. ······--' ·---. s11;23 ---·-ENGINE PARTS ~ 07Jq~2 CHARL[S P. CPOWLEY CO. S93.87 PUMP PARTS '~1 071'i93 CU CO~SOLIDATEO IJATfR S21.70 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL \~ ---nn tt94 · ncroP s cc~PANY ------------· -· ····---·----· · · u. 399 ~ 40 ·----------·-· · i NSPEcTToti·· 3·:24..: I · --· · ---------·----· · · .., 071495 nHr OF CALIFORNIA $160.00 ANNEXATION 2-41 PROCESSING FEE '11 :I --------------------_ : ~ --_ ---- .. _, ____ _ ~l !>I y. IS' ~· ... -··--· .. --: ,:7 ~ ..... ~11 ·• -··-'·' ' r· 111 --~i~~ :i '" ··-·-J I··.·.'• ,,J .... NlJlJr---9111ir-;; -JT"lHfl--l!~R rnb·-r-i P"HH OCESSING DATE 10/2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OP.ANGE COUNTY 2 11r 1 -·------------------cu rns-J>nirro73T7a4 ____________________________ _ lJARP ANT NO. ---·-----·-·-_____________ _!£ND_o~-AHOUNT DESCPIPTION ~ --lF~ 071496 TOH DAWES S55.80 MEETING EXPENSES 071497 DECKER INSTRUMENT SUPPLY co. $77~e50 ELECTRiCAL SUPPLIES ----··un49a·-· ·· · --· -·-;n:to· ·--------··---·--· -------u,9e2.a9 ErEtTlfffrr-suliPrrr-------- 011499 DOLLINGER CORP. S~09e61 COMPRESSOR PARTS 071500 DUNN HW~ROS CORP. · SHle61 PAINT SUPPLIES (f715trr-··---~Al-"Clrn-P.--$736. oo ~AB AHALYS IS 071502 EIMCO PROCESS f.QUIP. CO. s6,598e50 Pl~E SUPPLIES 0715J3 EASTMAN, INC. Sl•247e69 ~FFit~ ·~UP~L~£S --~7150-4 --·-ureHANlER' lflf"; sr.soo. DO OCEAN MoN lfolt I NG J71505 fNVIRONMENTAL RESOUPCE ASSOC. S97e50 LAB ANALYSIS ~715G6 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S76tllle85 SLUDGE HAULINGfblSPOSAL -OT1"5ll7 FEOE"RlrL"t>CPRESS CUR Pe _. · • ,. · . ·. · ~72• o~ ... · ·;.!; ~ ·. · ;.· FREI QHf . : i:. , ; ·. · ,._, .. ~ ': . .-.· ::;:~ :;~ :: · ·' !.'.· • 071508 FIBERGRATE CORP. ,,(.·'··,;:,_. . ''.· .. ':· Utl68·1~~::;~;:~xr ... i.~~1 ~RAtlffQ->,: ···;; ,_ .. ;f~~l<:.:«"::~~.r:;~~.---.>>:::n 0715t9 FISCHER g PORTER Ct;> •. _ ' _,,_ '.',·~<-:. '.;.;< :.:.:s4U~i:s ... ::·>:~_::.::·.r~-~---. -IP~,$UPPLtl?"S .. ,: ... '=.~_;;;·~:f.,.,r,:.::;~~;:~~';f~)~.\'\: ... --vn s·1 o---· ----·-·· nsi:ru·scTElJrm-c--r • s6s. 2 071511 FLAT & VCRTICAL CONCRETE S217e75 CONCRETE CUTTING 071512 FLO-SYSTEMS S412e34 PUMP PARTS 07TIT3 -FLUID HANDLING SYSTEM$• me .• ..,-... :::_;..,.,·, .. ·,: .. ·; '.\;;/;;~,;:·'.t;~.-"./;, s;5$•_07,,,;;~:~~r;;;~1;.~;.:. ~.~PIP•. $UPP .. 1 E"&. . .· -·~H1't~-:Zr:1fJyil;j'\,_;_}--.r.~ . O 7 151 't Do N AL D L • f OX & A SS OC t A lE~·-·. '. «' ~.;· ,/),-, {;!-'~\. -': ::~:\'.~L~~}~;[~~ f·:<.: ··~~ ~ • P. 9't'.~i~JJ;~y{.';: $A f.£.JY? ~QNS~ ~ t ~'4J<: .,.tt;~'.-~~{~i~~:~~·;·:~_, .. ~. _;;_ 071515 THE FOXBORO COMPANY ; -·'· ,~_-'.:,:-;_-i '\:·~~-H.~:i·.~;~. ;:J:,;/;j(.H:i)JJf>.!-1;.~/.:::,.~: .. /;, 4 ·•~a:J~;;. ~i-<"it·~·l} ;•LfCtA c~t--.: SU~P~J E_ ... :~~1:}t~ M ~%~'.~1 ty{~i~/f·.:· f'T1 lf7f516 EDWARD R • FRANCIS S6 Oe 93 to.~ II 11 ll 14 I\ ,, II .,I .... , ·~ .. . XI • ll 111,~" ll ·, lC ~ 16,: .. , 11 ... 1& 1' Jll '" 11 ... n 1l la -~ I ·071517 GANAHL LUMBfR co. s120.1e .SMALL HARDWARE "2 n11s1a GENEPAL TELEPHONE co. $878.~4 TELEPHONE . -- ~71519 GIERLICH-MITCHEll• INC.' . -~ ~.~ ... :-.· <-~; _.,~~;,:~~>~.-.:;:l!h8~.•·n~,·!,:'{>~·~·~.>:-T~~-F.IL.l.I. RTP.··".~_BB~B ~tl::.~"•'·f·r·:ti."t~rt;J~r*-~:' .. : Ill :1'] :1 1' .J 071520 HACH COMPANY ·:·.:-; ~ :'."-/~ .. ,<,(·;··:":.· .Sh~S0.932:~1~,: •• {::~i~~f/ ~AA · S9~PL US·:}·., .···<~1Jf:g~:'~\:~J\1:~~~;: ·~:-~c,· : :1 .-J 071521 LARRY HALL'S ·' ·: . :' ..... ,. .. ,.;-._._,. ·.:.,· ... ···1--~ s·o· ~~-·::.-·~_:'':·!•.:· ,. RU"-k"REPAttt"'···.··.·.·::'.,':,:f·'·~ .. ':i.:···.:~\:''.:~~~~.'.'l';·.·. 1 . • . i • : • ;-·.:· ,·.-:,,. ... ::.-·J, :r .. _7.:.•: ;~ ;·..-.··. ~~" .... ·~·:·.: ... ~:~~ ..... , ........ ;'. ,· ~ . 0 •· ~· .. ;'_:~~·'.:={j'f·~t'~i1·~t;_...._.:ftf:•.!··+ f'. U ----nr!l~2 ---,"U"SlTIJTHOGGAN' INC. S3U.65 PUMP PARTS -t\ 171523 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS S86.09 SHALL HARDWARE : 07152~ HARTGE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION co. ss,aoo.30 PLANS s SPECS l-2R-2A ~ ~ 1i----.... c ..... 1~1-s-2s --rfttsTY 550.52 , PUil I CATI ON :.:! · . " 071526 E.G. HELLER'S SONt INC. S692.41 .. ·-· .TOOL REPAIR0$ ·-::_... ... : ~ 071527 ~.c. HENDIHE & co., INC. $415.88 PIPE SUPPLU:S . . ~1 ·' ----c1rs2s------·------R-;-S-;--R"OlrnE-S-Clr.1--,-WC.-TI43 .56 PA nrr·-uppj I Er--·----------------\l 0715~9 CITY Of HUNTINGTON PEACH Sl6.55 WATER USEAGE ~ J tl7153C HYClROTEX S7t15'h83 ENGINE OIL "' .. ----Un) 53r-·--. ------R'OfJE'RlrlrJ'f[[~O'FF HAN -·--------S164. 83 ClA I H snnc:1n1rr- C 71532 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL CO. S13t148.07 FERRIC CHLORIDE L ~71533 INDUSTRIAL THREADFD PRODUCTS S279.39 SHALL HARDWARE ----·~71534 -JRVJNr--·r\JrrPING SrR vrcr------. ---. -·--. --------1·H9;l)'O" --------p[ANftfArNTEHAHCE _____ _ 071535 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. S263e90 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES J7l536 KIMMEPLE BROS., INC. $52.80 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES t-I -~nn:37 . . . RI NG rff1HH~e>•. INC;-·. ---------·-----. ---.. ----------$·3-t31t6-;·os------B£AR nnl-SUP-PU Es-·· ----- 07l538 ~LEEN-LINE CORP S~l0.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES (•71539 L.r.~.s •• INC. S35.33 WELDING SUPPLIES -nr5li'l --· Tll ·14onr· C:HEHICAL rrrnmrr.n;-----. ··------. !2%.9·~-·-----··-·-·soLVERTS, TU ·sorrPLI ES"--------·-- ~71 ~41 LARRY'~ OLOG. ~ATf~JALSt INC. $208.17 BUILDING MATERIALS L _____ - ( . , . ( ·~ ( \I 1!>11 "1 i'"' . _ _, 1r~t C1 -~~ !Cc r.•. "'· .. "'I····· . ··--·--1::1 M II.._) ------::1 1::. ·•. J·•,l ~ ( ... ir----FuNO--NG ------9199 ---'JTllIST-~ORKINr. ·c APTTJL ~ ( ----------------l'lfO"cr~STNG DA 1 E I-u721r787+YA"G~~ REPORT NUMAER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ( ------------·--·---· cu:1Msrurr·1on17g4·--------------------··------·· --···-· -·-··-·-· ·-----------------·-·-:-··---··· --1~ ii \IARR ANT NO. VE NOOR AMOUNT DE·SCRI PTJON ·-----------------·--·-----·-··--------··-··-·---------·----... -·-------·---·---·-·-· r71542 H.v. LAVNMASTER g co, INC. $161.10 TESTING P2·26 . . ·--------·--·--1:1 ____________ J:! ]a ·------------~·1. :~ ~71~43 LIGHTl~G CISTRIBUTOPSt INC. S675al4 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 11 071545 MACK TRUCKS, INC. Sl68.25 TRUCK PARTS ., £J715"6 JOHN T. MALLOY · S't5t900e00 CONTRACTOR 5-21-lRl 14 ·~ Iii 10R•TI'5lflf··-·-----··--·-rGr.l:-;-nraNc-nrc --s221t.31f .. ···. e. u. IL. DING-H .. AfEiffALs-·-·· ll ---r7151i7 --. MA~VAC-"f[ECTRONlCS -----------sus-;?ilJ ELECTRICAL -SUPP.;_.L,.....1.-:E"""s,.----------·----------------II u C715lf8 MATT -CHLOR, INC. $21827•57 ,, _ PIPE SUPPLlES ,~ 071549 MCKINLEY EGUIPHENT CORP.,· "S69.34 i·:,~:·:. TRUCK 1ARTS ,, --Tln5sir-··----·--"lfct-rtSTER-tARR-SUPPLY co. 09.82 SHALL HARDWARE •, .l • ~· .. ~:... ·.~'i ·-------·--··---·-- .·.; " 071551 MILLS PrSJSTOR co. $80.99 PIPE SUPPLIES ~ Q71552 J. ARTHUR MOOREt CAt INC. S1t413.88 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ., nss3-·--· · ··---1.aTuRocr.--iwt. . . .; . sna.g~ ·'-:.-:·~_.:-:,·ELECTRICAL SUPPLUS :<: :.·'·:··-··~· ._·;-, 1•1· ·~ IO 11 11 1l 14 n 161 10 07155,. NA TI ON AL LU"BER SUPP~~-.' .::;'i . 'i .. ,· ',~;.~; '.'·., ··~· .. i/~.: .· . .:"'{&id::1<~-'.~:-~,~~~-!_~~: .. ~,:1h>-i(;~:_;~;./,-.;$HAL~ ~~~ewA,~ .. -:~·"·~'.'.J~%~'.J}i~\·:~~i~H{.\;.:,:-., ' l .... . ' 11 071555 NELSON•DUNNt tNC. ,,, .... ~-.. :.'>·~;.1.·!-;fr.,_., .... ,,.·,'.··.·. '.·.7·-i::•:·~l:· .. ·,::f $0f1f:·-~· .·.,,_k,.~~,·~tNGINE. AKT . .,.,-' . ., .. ;i·} 1L·.t.~,.~.,,,., ... _. _. _·_._. __ _ 11 "Tr55'6-----------'N[WARK tLECTR1fNlC" ELECTRICAL SUPPL I ES l1 11 l9 J) 11 J1 Jl J4 n 071557 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Sl9e80 WATER USEAGE N 071~58 SY NIELSON SERVICE S462e61 LAB HAINTENANCE 1\ T559 occromAL CHEMICAt CORP· :: ; ,.-.. ,; __ .. < .. :.:\/C''/ >·' .. /~·J.;~~\:·~,·~P~J";:'i,iUHh~1~/:_,'~4U$.JIC SC)DA : ... ·:·. ,:",~~=--~~i?F~~:.:?:i\::;;/.;: _;>_ i-. •• •. 11 071560 ORITEX CORP .. r •.i.;:;_ • ·;.,·'_;:-'.; .':·'.· ,.~.~-·~·"\:.~~'"·~·!:· ,:.f106•$~:·;·~i,f -~;~~!~,(.STUL. STOCK ·· ~:~·,~~,·~·::~~'..\··!·":~.i.«i~-ff~~:;:'..-.:;_;ifv~· •: · -· 071561 OXYGEN SERVICE -~·-.:-. :, .. ~-~~-·--. .... i;'.:.:,: .... ·,;_~-:-.;,:.,.;::;-.: •. :,, .. ,;.~'l;:,~~! .. _-· ... 3k,;:~e11J::, .. i: :'. ':t.••i41 E" itt"A'L'i..itiiiiil!5".'-,• o· u· '.tiili' 'ilo~:J!~·~.-·t'..~'"·~~·-"''·''''··'." :.·.: 11 ._ . • . .,.. • "·:.:!._ 4-• ., .;.· ~"'·· .:;,,.~·-·~ .·,• -~-; ·.-::-· "'·~t····""-""·£.:~-~... ...,, .. } ~ _., . ~ ~:... .... . ··~-·· · a ~ •· 1· ""~ 1:. • nn ~. ... . -:.t . . .. .. -... n r" 71"5&2 CU • PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXAMS, DENSITY TESTING n I 0715~3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Slt990e49 REIM&URSE WORKERS• COHP. FUND JO V·l C17J5E.t+ ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Slt672.80 WATER PRODUCTION . ·:I':: 01 f~~--~~!~00 :~ ~~~~~G INC· .. · · :,. \· "· · .. ':< .,·r:: ·.:''.:(~_.'· ·. ·., .··:::';_-:.:.:.-:-:~ ·:'~-~!I;~;,t9;\-~~:t:~tJ;::~:~:: ~f, ~r~~~ ~ E~. ·' .. : .:·~ .. ·;~·:>t~·':X~~2::~~zW<.r·~::.· · . :. n 07156 7 PAC IF IC ME CHAN ICA~ · SYST~f1S._:·\;·t·; :·>: /.} ·.-_: ::·~:·;~ . >·.~ ,~·~· ·~~ ttlO ~ 0-~·~;;t,~;~n:i::;~J.: tONTRACTOR' .J• I tit , · '<-. 1,·;_r:_;::'.•'·:~l!i-(;~:i~v-;. <· · -: ~u---i!71"S~R"-------,,-A'"CTFTtrfCBILE O'FFICES -. hsd.52 MOBILE OFFICE RENTAL J~ 117 J 569 PACO $935 .25 PUMP PARTS M 071570 rACIFIC SAFETY fQUIPHENT CO. $331.46 FIRST AID SUPPLIES Ji ----r.n571----· .. -·-PACIFIC BELL____ it889461 · .. :. TELEMETERING .7 ··-'» Jsl JI Ja JS II ,, 4J 14 45 45 u 41 " l! l71572 PARKSON CORPORATJON $h340e't0 . BUBBLE DIFFUSERS · :,·:: )') 071573 PARTS UNLIMITED Shl78.t51 " TRUCK PARTS ·: ---------------------- •o -----..1 p:7z; ......... ·--·--·· ... _P"~Sl:"AC-·g-ClJDlfftr-·-i 268•IU1.60 CONTRACTOR P2-26 1~ ~·1 '•1 '" r71575 PICKWICK PAPER PRODUCTS S494.17 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ~~ 11 \.171~7(, T0'4 PONTON, INC. Sl26t163e32 FLOW HETERS u . -r.n 577--------... -·HARUtUt'RH'IROsr-TC S31r.1JO I NOUS TR I AL WASTE-SAMPl~ING I CE I « ~71578 THE REGISTER S837.56 CLASSIFIED ADVERT~StMG ~ 071579 THE REGISTER Slt784.59 LEGAL ADVERTISING --ri11 ~fu----------·---Rc:rnr·srrn An 1 Es .. ,~-------------------· ---------n-rr.tJ1f ____ coiiiioi:-f:O.ufPi1-Ei~r- o 11se1 lHE REFUBLIC SUPPLY co. OF CALIF.,·INC. $192.92 PIPE SUPPLIES ~715~2 RICOH CORP S235.6~ COPIER RENTAL '41 •• HTS!3 -------""FOES INS g-MEYERS . --------------··-·--·-------···---.. ---------S19"3.sr··---;;UHP.PART-S -----··-- ij7J584 JOSEPH T. ~YERSON & SON, INC. Sl39.06 STEEL STOCK 117nl85 OONALD o. ST. JOHN Sl78.ll CLAltL.HTT1Ef1I~T .. _ --·-----------------~- •11 ---1111!iF.6 -· · .... sAl'm-·nou.ap· eus1Nrs~ruRRs---· ---·-·--·----------------s9og;air-·--------OFFICE FORMS ~71507 SANTA AHA fLECTRJC ~OTORS S678.86 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 1• -· .,, IH '·~ t •.. --· ' 1~r.I .,I ~L ------ ------j·~~ . .., ~~ "' --·-------61 ~] '•l •1 ------.. ., 1,, I,,, _J·· -·-· ·-----:~1 ::! ' ~' ;n! i·'-'I ,·1..J " rnllln NO ""ljf?1'1-.. Jf--l)I'StlJ1llfKTNGUPJTAI PROCESSING DATE 10/25/84 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF O~ANGf COUNTY ! If lt -----------· ---crn11s-· F>Arn·-nrn1 npr· ·-------------------····--· -----------------------· \I i \IAl'1.R ft NT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 071588 CITY OF SEAL BEACH S109.50 WATER USEAGE ~71589 SEARSt ROEBUCK & co. S575•i2 TOOL$ ' ,.. I ' "I"' 11 11 1a ---u-7T"5.91'.J ___________ SL7'RSIRUtK· ·n1~T--sAl~ ---. 1380.63 TROtlC-P-JUtiS--· ·------. ···-· ----· --·---- "Lll71551 SERPENTIX COt~VEYOR CORP. Slt975e59 . PUM. P PARTS ~ 171592 SHAMROCK SUPPLY · S2t268e76 TOOLS u' l:S9~-· St1TTFr-£ff£RY-"t~ S407•75 . . TESTING P2~H .... :1 .. " 07159't SOUTH COAST OFFICE EQUIPMENT . S519it93 · ::·~.>OFFICE FURNltURE ... · : ,,.: .. :, .. .:':··_.;· · I~ 011595 so. CALIF. coAsTAL WATE~ usu~cH ;prtoJE\it , : .~ .... '. · shhP~ ~Q ·.· · : .... ~:~:~~f. o~~P ocEAN si.Ut>~I '.P i_5,0$A~'-st."OY· 11-·--rrn:'i%"____ SOUTHERN CALIF. EDI SurJ co. $2181975 .43 po\ilER 11 IJ715~7 so. CAL. GAS CO. . S33tlf65.66 NATURAL GAS n 071598 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. S8.97 WATER USEAGE ll "1 .- IS " " ,.,. ,, --·---·--i'lC 11 ,. '1,,.. u .. lC 19 I lllJ!igq S:llUIRERN EOUNTIES OIL .Cha·_• · . .-: .. · .. _.~='-· ,e~ .. ··':·.~:: !'~·'!: Sid·ad!ilaf;f·:,~!l~P?~lW*&Lblldilft .JU(L.•.· -·~?.:,.·.i ?:Vk1'.':t:'·!:.F~Lft~ .. ~.:,~~~·~.c~_,._. ..... ~,,_-:--'"ltf~···.-'-~;-In ,.r P71600 11 071601 n --;J7TE1f2 1l 071603 SUPER CHEM CORP S181. 05 1~ (\71604 THE SUPPLIERS S1t033. 86 lS~ u, .L cu~ 'nurtr~ UIW "'"'-U'V~n-. \.V. . .~ •. ·.: •. -:.:-::.· ... ~ ... ;;;w;;\:~!,::;::;_;;..'i(:i;·.~-:::;f:}~~.\"D~lJ.~ ,~,~ il"fD ~;s. H 011606 TONY •s LocK ". sAFE· st:tt~.1 ct:;:···~tr.:t~r:j~~.::~;.:~}~~;:;Ni?;<:I~:f.f~ •r;,.'Aif;:: $•oH ··.?;;.~~t: 0716(17 TR ANS -AMER JCA ·.OELAV ... L. :.. ··t ··.c ... ·1111 ·;t;!l'.~:.-,;~,J~:~~; '';<•, ·~;~."L'·ir ~!!·1''11"~~?·~,t~_.,_2b" :.ill•.. ~,:~~_,,., 11 ~ . ; . " ..•. ; r-· ,.·. ,., . ~"·1o·#•I ,,)f .••:.,; (·::II: .. ::-~·., ·~~ f{\:f.:~ l,r.o•"JP, ~ tp "".ft.~. . .. I"!\ n rfi-TtTI'liw--·----nr t • • . 11 I !l7l609 TRANSAP4ERICA DELAVAL1 INC. S163e82. ' 2 -· t'':e··:r;.:,,--,.,, ...... .,_ •• . .161 .. -· Jl . "Jll ,~ isl •. J& 3/ ,.,,. JO .r:-1'171610 TRAVEL TRAVEL . S148e00 ',l1 -~;1612 J.G. TUCKER & .. S0'4•. ;N~_·.·.r·~~X'~~ifr'f_i;;_~~\~it''.:~Jf]r·::.~1.~~~f~~~~{;r:;,~~~1· til n ·. l•o @liY .. JiJ~ .. • dhiTR ~ &Rd21 a ..... '•t• . .,, .... .r ~,l;::cJ,~ •. .t1..eJ..,.5.J.h, •. _ .. J4·.PdL . .-·._·•.'.• ,··~ fu :ul ~71613 UMA ENINEERIN~t U,ICe ,,, ., -.. ·:-:1:' • .-)lo:.";.•'~· ·.:.,:~~.}.~~\:"·''!i:,. ·~~.;:-t3.S4$!~~: .."·'·1 ,.j----ine-rr-----u. s. A 0 to GL As ' • • H 071615 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S29e99 DELIVERY SERVICE H 071616 . VWR SCIENTIFIC · S70e60 LAB SUPPLIES 071617 VMLEY ClllES SUPPLY CU. : .. , , S2p08a91 '.: ::<:.~ .d'IPE. SyPPLIES, VALVE$.:· l•w·71618 c. K. VARNER co., Uc.. · . ·· . $3.71. tOO ··~. '." .:.' ,··· BUILDING MATERIALS .. l!I 071619 VAUGHAN'S INDUSTRIAL REPAIR co ·h~s.ob' ·'' . ENGINE REPAIRS. .. u 7 tb2tr-----vmu~J:cmwr---~s. o u -YRUTlff---rt"EPXTRr· 31 41 ~71621 L~P.RY WALKER ASSOCIATES, INC. Slt116e86 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT P2·23-6 11 071622 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER Slt336.27 ENGINE PARTS 10 -11nl;23---. ----'YEST'CTI"ASS-Rl>TOR t INC. ---Titon. 06 POHP-PA-RTs-·-- :u r.71 l24 Mf.STERN STATES OILFIELD PROO. $66.59 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES IU ~71625 WESTALLOY, INC. S999.~7 WELDING SUPPLIES 01 .. : u u IS l&, .• 41 Cl " ~n ~I '·I ~Ji ... '' -------1·~: ... ~, -~F7U26 ___ ·-. ---· ---tJt~TING'fft>USf-ITH'TRTCl"ORP _______ ·---. --... -·----·----···s2-;-33rJ;53··-----nECTRTCA[""SUPPUE!-----------·--------··----· -----. --·-'1~~ r1 071627 ~HJTEt FINE & V£RVILLf $2,775.96 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY ::~--~~~;;--------.. ----~~~~i~-c~!~.~~RI~.~--_!_NC ----·----··-----------·-----s-~:~::.;.:~-------i~:~~~~~:~.~~~;.~tr ..,·· -~ ,,, 071630 Y -TIRE" S710.H TRUCK TIRES 071631 ZIP TfMPOP.ARY PEPSONNEL S789e73 TEMPORARY HELP ·----·-____ .. ----1" ·-· ---·-. ---------·---------. 1~:, < ----·-· ---1"'1 r .. 11 ~I ·--· ...... _. _____ ·-·---·-···------·--·----------·-··---··---- ~? M -------------~~- ~· TOTAL CLAIMS PAJC 1~/31/R4 ! 1. 35q' •)2 2. 74 ================= ISIO ( ., . ( ( "' 1111 II\,.. . -· --·-('' -·,1:1 1•11 _J:~t ' FUND NO( 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 4 ( PROCESSING.DATE 10/25/84 ---·--------------..R ..... E .... P-ORTrHJlfB"ER APlf] COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (rAGE 5 11 • ..- ··-·· .. _ ........ __ -·----_-·----------·-·-----------.. --·····---..!~~!_MS_ PAJ_~1-~j31 /84. --------.. -·-··· -·-... -·--·--·-------.. -···-··----· ···----··---· 10 II 11 IJ 14 I~ u II 18 19 10 11 11 n 1t SUMMARY #1 OPER FUND #1 ACO FUND AMOUNT $ ---17···0PER .. FUND·-·------------ 642.06 13,271.20 -e51-:·u---- 62 ACO FUND 18, 9s2. 80 #3 OPER FUND 269.26 ·-·-1r·Aco·-FuRlr_____ . . . ·,,·:; i~ ~~:R F~~:o . .. . '. . .. .:-,::<·:·: .. ··_: ... i)i{~~:::;:):~::.·; .~·: tV. · · ·-; :. ,: ·· (;:;;;'.:/>·-~~;~-f,,r·'. ----·115·. Al:U-'F'URtr· -·- # 6 OPER FUND #6 ACO FUND ----,i-DYElr"FtrR"u----------~----------~------~r--~--:~~..,._""r"""s-r-tnr.-r- # 7 ACO FUND , 17 F/R FUND , , ---,rr-oPER"' FUtnr-. • #11 ACO FUND 898.63 #5&6 OPER FUND 987.84 ' :': 101 ."· II ::it· 1ll jll 111 r. lJ .'1 .. 14 :1,- 71 ... 11 n Jllr 11 ' ... '1 IJ 311,·" l\ •• 1 -. :~:n~~~=D ·'··· '· · · ·· h · 900 OD 11 .... JT OPER FUND n m ORF '6 (''. ?)' h' "T" -n• '¢ 'f. 't ·-en• I ,!'»H• ct .•f > ~:' >' lis •"'"''" Jr I SELF FUNDED,LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND U1 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND ll 342. git 1,990.ltg ,.I_ ... l9 • x;;c.1 u.... ,,. s. ..n ,,.o,;_ _ ··"' •• _ .... s_esa:.s a ..... _Ath _ ..... ~ I~ 19 JO ORKING &APIT JJ '11 .. ~, TOTAL.-CLA!MS--a.AJ.D-ioJ.J.l.l.41a .... -.... ·· ·, ·· · ~· ·-'"'" · • 1 iz Ut'!f'io va:;a:., '" -.," '""--,,:-··rm -y " =• -rn.· Y"" • -· n·-· ...... · · ~ ·-.-.. , , " 3S l& · ... ~ ·'::·~;~{\~/ .. ~~,·. • ,fT ·, :·:· ......... -.r .. ·:. ·~ ,· JI ll XI •a ---. -------·------------_____ __; _____ __: ___ ..;........_....i..~.--~:._ __ _:_ _ _:._...: __ ~ _ _:__._ ~11 '" ·~ 4J cs ,, 141 Cl ., 1:; 1SJ SI S\ l~r. ~'· •1.-......... ·-·-. ·-------- ~' ~s! ... ~ ·------------------ "" •.1 ···--~--=:~~--~·--~=~:-·-~----=~=-~~=-~-~=-=:--··--·----------~~ ~ _--:-:--1 -1~,1 Ir,,, r.1 --·--------··,.1! , .. I --.. -:; "' ---~-· i'1 '··· i:J• \,,, II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS DECEMBER 12J 1984 -7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 (5) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute following cities re election of mayor, appointment .Directors, and seating new members of the Boards: City District (s) Active Director Cypress 3 John Kanel* Huntington Beach 3 Ruth Bailey* ll Ruth Bailey* ll John Thomas Philip Maurer* Post Office Bo x 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA excerpts fr o m the of alternate (*Ma yor ) Alternate Dir e ctor Richard Partin John Thomas Robert P. Mandie, Jr . Ruth Finley Bill Agee . Newport Beach 5 5 6 7 B ill AgQe f·MP·~~ Ruthelyn Plummer Philip Maurer* E oelyn Ill!rE-~ ~ John Cox, Jr. Bill Age e Stanton 3 Sal Sapien Jea n Siriani* (b) Actions required due to reorganization of the following Boards: (1) DISTRICT 5 Election of Qhahmsn aAa Chairman pro tern (2) DISTRICT 6 Election of Chairman pro tern (3) DISTRICT 7 Election of Chairman pro tern (4) DISTRICT ll Election of Chairman pro tern ALL DISTRICTS \" I • (15) (a) Consideration of motion declaring intent to amend the J o int Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement to include newly formed County Sanitation District No. 13 effective January 1 , 1985 ~ ( , ' ... _:(Jfi() (/11(.'1,l'.' :\:r .. Surtr· ' -------_,,_ --------· ---------------- December 4, 1984 Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester General Manager (•ON() f\A"-tf\j MllNWIPAL WATE:~ [J1<;Tn1r·1 (lRA ... ,;r COllNT'I' 'I.AHR rw·.~n:-· '•M• f\fllNARflll\I(> vAllE'I' '-4lltHC1PAi WA1~R nrr,TR·\ · •'·l·'ill'•'·411P<t('tPA: 1;:.1r~r"c,•1, · MAl•A,,1 ;. I ANO"<( W SCHLANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 SUBJECT: Dear Sir: WASTE PERMIT TO OOHS TO DISCHARGE PRETREATED STRINGFELLOW WASTE In response to your letter of November 16th, which set forth certain conditions of concurrence in the issuance of the subject Waste Permit to be issued by SAWPA to OOHS, I am submitting the following to satisfy the stipulations as outlined in your letter: Stipulation (1) "Verification by staff that the Districts' NPDES Permit would not be affected by the granting of such an authorization." Enclosed are copies of letters of July 16th and July 24th, 1984, from the U.S. EPA and the CRWQCB, respectively, which state that the Districts' pretreatment program was approved and is a part of the Districts' NPDES program. Strict enforcement of the pretreatment requirement would not affect the Districts' NPDES permit. Stipulation (2) "That the U.S. EPA/State conduct a full environmental review (EIR) commencing immediately, to be paid for by Superfund." Enclosed is a copy of the OOHS letter committing to an environmental review of the interim program for Stringfellow. This commitment should satisfy this condition. Stipulation (3) "That daily monitoring of the Stringfellow effluent be conducted and reports provided daily to Districts' staff, to be paid for by Superfund." Total Water Qualit.'V Management -SA WPA 's Commitment to the Community Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY December 4, 1984 Page Two Stipulation (4) "That the Directors be notified if any discharge of water does not meet our Ordinance requirements." These conditions are contained in the Waste Permit which your staff has reviewed and has approved from a technical and monitoring standpoint. · Stipulation (5) "That Districts' staff have authority to terminate the acceptance of String- fellow wastewater upon notification.that any of the effluent does not meet the required limitations." This permit is issued by SAWPA, and like any permit, non- compliance may result in revocation. To consent to the Districts' having authority to terminate a SAWPA permit may involve a con- tractual amendment between SAWPA and CSDOC. SAWPA has a contractual obligation to the CSDOC and, as such will commit to full enforce- men:t -t(.l~ this permit as well as others issued by SAWPA that are tributary to the SARI line. On behalf of SAWPA Directors, I would like to express SAWPA's appreciation to you and your Board in recognizing the importance of this interim program to protect and improve the groundwaters of the Santa Ana River Basin. Very truly yours, SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY J~~ U~ager rk:jad SANTA ANA U'"ATERSHED PROJECT.~ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 215 Fremont Street San Francisco. Ca. 94105 Santa Ana watershed Project Authority 2060 Chicago Suite C-3 Riverside, CA 92507 Attention: Mr. J. Andrew Schlange Manager Dear Mr. Schlange: 1 6 JUL 1984 on January 9, 1984, the EPA approved Orange County Sanita- tion Districts' pretreatment program. In its program submittal, the Districts described their capability, authority, and responsi- bility for implementing Federal pretreatment requirements within their service area (including SAWPA's jurisdiction). Included within this authority is the Districts' right to refuse to ac- cept or to discontinue accepting wastewater discharges to the sewer system to prevent impairment of the quality of receiving waters nr other problems in the treatment facilities. The EPA believes~t:hat this is the most reasonable and effective means \wl ft>f! ..providing comprehensive regulation of the numerous industrial sources that discharge to POTWs throughout the country. In addition to our review and approval of OCSD's pretreatment program, this off ice has kept abreast of the proposed sewer dis- charge permit for treated groundwater extracted from the String- fellow site. Since OCSD is operating an EPA approved pretreatment program, it has the primary responsibility for assuring compliance with pretreatment requirements. Nevertheless, after reviewing the limitatians developed by SAWPA for the St'ringfellow discharge, it appears that those limitations will be adequate to protect· water qµality and tr~atment plant operations. Ouestions should be addressed to Gregory Baker of my staff at (415) 974-8336. Sincerely, ~~ ~ .. ·.t-,Pa. Frank M. Covington Director, Water Man cc: Orange County Sanitation Districts • ~ RECEIVED JUL 1 7 i984 S. A. W. P. A /i~ D v1s1on ·. . i STAT.E OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor ,· CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SANTA ANA REGION '-"'809 INDIANA AVENUE, SUtT~ ZOO RIVl!RSIDK, CALl ... ORNIA 9ZIM PHONE: (71•) •••-H30 July 24, 1984 Mr. J. Andrew Schlange, Manager Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 2060 Chicago Avenue, Suite c-·3 Riverside, CA 92507 Dear Mr. Schlange: We have reviewed SAW~A's draft penn1t limits for discharge of treated extracted groundwater from the Stringfellow site to the SARI line. Based on our evaluation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's current flows and influent and effluent quality, we do not anticipate that the pro- posed discharge will affect CSDOC's NPDES permit compliance. In addition, we note that CSDOC has an EPA-approved pretreatment program, and that this office recOf1111ended approval of the program. This pretreatment program gives the Districts adequate legal and procedural authority to regulate all discharges to their system to ensure pennit compliance and protection of the treatment works. If you have any questions, please contact me or Kurt Berchtold of my staff. Sincerely, 1 /7,, ...__~~ .... ~d~<-- JAMES W. ANDERSON Executive Officer cc: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County State Departament of Health Services, Sacramento -Tan Bailey KVB:nao STATE OF CALIFORNIA-HEALTH AND WELFARE AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Go~rnor DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 714/744 P STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 '-'1(916) 324-3773 Andrew Schlange, General Manager Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 2060 Chicago Avenue, Suite C-3 Riverside, California 92507 Dear Andy: IEc t o 198,;. This is written to provide assurance to your agency that the Department concurs with the stipulations on the operation of the Stringfellow pretreatment plant as they are expressed in the November 16, 1984 letter f'rom the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County · (CSDOC) to your agency. The Department will assure that an environmental review will be prepared and circulated to interested parties. The environmental review will focus on the potential and probable impacts that the pretreated Stringfellow effluent would have on SAWPA's facilities and their environs, CSDOC's facilities and their environs, and to receiving waters upon final discharge. The remaining stipulations are in conformance with our previous understanding of how the pretreatment plant will be permitted to operate. If you have further concerns about this matter please contact me directly. Sincerely, Charles A. White Site Mitigation and Management Unit Toxic Substances Control Division @ . . 1 SUMMARY OP INTERIM TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL PROGRAM FOR STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE ... BACKGROUND OF STRINGFBLLOW SITH The Stringfellow Class I Hazardous Waste ··Disposal Site is located in Pyrite Canyon near Glen Avon, approximately ten miles west of Riverside, California. The 22 acre site was opened in 1956 and received approximately 34 million gallons of industrial waste before being closed to dumping in 1972. The waste consisted mainly of spent acids and caustics with significant amounts of ·sul- furic, nitric and hydrochloric acid. In addition, heavy metals were deposited in the form of inorganic chemical compounds of zinc, lead, mercury and chromium; and organic residues from the manufacutre of DDT, including the degradation products DOE and DDD. Other organic compounds disposed at the site were cleaning solvents, such as TCE, along with isophorone, dichlorobenzene and phenol. Following detection of groundwater leakage from the site in December, 1972; the site was closed and no more waste accepted. Between 1976 and 1982, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board implemented plans to haul away liquid wastes, neutralize the remaining sludges with kiln dust, and cover the residual neutralized wastes with a clay cap. Major improvements were also made in diverting surface runoff away from the site, and in constructing a clay barrier at the southern end to prevent further leaching of liquid wastes into the groundwater aquifer. Various. monitoring wells for surveying the movement of the contaminated groundwater plume, interceptor wells for extracting this groundwater plume,, and some shallow well points within the encapsulated site Itself were constructed for withdrawing contaminated leachate. The Interceptor wells and the well points within the site serve to extract contaminated leachate and groundwater which are currently hauled to a ~lass I facility. The apparent lack of an adequate leachate barrier at the site has allowed a portion of the stored wastes to' ·enter and contaminate local groundwaters in the Pyrite Canyon area. To date, a plume of groundwater contaminated with toxic organic chemicals and heavy metals bas migrated downgradient from the dumpsite. Estimates of the rate of movement of this plume of contaminated groundwater is approximately 1,000 to 1,200 feet per year. Efforts are presently underway at the site to halt the movement of the contaminated groundwater and extract the contaminated water from the ground. The California State Department of Health Services (OOHS) and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are directing these cleanup efforts. Cleanup work currently underway involves the pumping of up to 60,000 gallons per day (gpd) of contaminated water from interceptor wells and trucking the _,_ wastewater to a Class I disposal site ln Santa Barbara County. This pumping and dlsposaal program of untreated waste was to halt the migration of the plume so that it would not reach the main underJiround water supplies south of Route 60 Freeway. However, recent testing (October-November, 1984) reveals that the plume has crossed the freeway and migrating toward the Chino Water Basin. BACKGROUND OP SANTA ANA WATBRSHBD PROJBCT AUTHORITY (SAWPA) The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) ls a joint powers agency formed as a result of successful litigation by the Orange County Water District to insure an adequate water supply from the Santa Ana River Basin. This. joint powers agency's members are the Chino Basin Municipal Water District, the Orange County Water District, the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, the Western Municipal Water District, and the Eastern Municipal Water District. To Improve the groundwater quality in the Santa Ana River Basin and the water supplies to Orange County, as well as other member agencies, a comprehensive groundwater management plan was developed. An integral part of this plan was the extension of a sewer line from the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) treatment and disposal facilities into Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. In 1972, a wastewater treatment and disposal agreement was entered into with the CSDOC whereby SAWPA purchase S mgd of capacity rights in the District's treatment and disposal facilities with the right to additional purchase rights up to 30 mgd. Presently, SA WPA has purchased 8 mgd of capacity rights in the treatment and disposal facilities of the CSDOC. In addition, SA WPA has paid for 30 mgd of capacity rights in the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer from the CSDOC treatment facilities in Fountain Valley to the OC line. To Insure quality control on waste discharge to the CSDOC facilities, the following Quality Criteria was included in the CSDOC/SA WPA ·· Agreement: 'The quality of wastewater discharged by SAWPA into the existing and expanded facilities of Sanitation Districts shall comply with the Quality Criteria established by th~ Sanitation Districts, which Criteria may be amended by Sanitation Districts from time to time, so long as the same are reasonably related to quality criteria applicable to wastewater dis- charges within Sanitation Districts. Said Quality Criteria apply only to the blended flow delivered to Sanitation Districts by SAWPA. However, SA WPA shall, at the request of Sanitation Districts, furnish and periodi- cally update a list of all persons discharging wastewater into SA WPA's system, together with a statement of the approximate volume and quality of such discharges. It ls not intended that this agreement wlll furnish SA WPA a competitive advantage in the location of industrial plants within its corporate boundaries or those of its assignees." -2- j. • INTERIM TRBATMBNT AND DISPOSAL PROGRAM FOR STRINGFELLOW The threat of hazardous waste flowing from the acid pit disposal area during periods of heavy rainfall, which occurred in 1969 and 1978, was substantially reduced by actions taken by the Region'}. Water Quality Control Board. These actions included removal of all waste from the surface, capping the disposal area, and diversion of storm runoff away from the site. Subsequent to these actions, the primary concern focused on the prevention of migration of subsur- face contaminants in the groundwaters. ·Samples of extracted groundwaters collected from wells revealed high levels of heavy metals and organic compounds directed below the disposal area. In the Pall of 1983, remedial actions were implemented in order to intercept the groundwater flow of contaminants from the disposal area and prevent their migration down the canyon. These remedial actions included pumping ground- waters from on-site and mid-canyon wells. The extracted groundwaters were routed to a series of holding tanks from which the groundwaters were transferred to trucks to be hauled to a Class I disposal area. From October to November, 1983, the untreated extracted groundwaters were trucked to the BKK Class I Landfill in West Covina, but switched to the Casmalia Class I site near Santa Barbara. The National Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes methods and criteria for de- termining the appropriateness of proposed remedial actions. In keeping with the intent and letter of the NCP, an endangerment assessment was conducted of the groundwater conditions and the projected environmental and public health hazards. This endangerment assessment was a joint effort conducted by the State Department of Health Services and CH2M Hill, a consulting engineer to EPA. A fast-track remedial investigation feasibillty study was conducted where several remedial alternatives were examined. The following technologies were Identified as candidates for the management and disposal of the contaminated extracted groundwaters from the Stringfellow site. These remedial alternatives which were considered are as follows: • Discharge to a publicly owned treatment works (POTW). • Pretreatment followed by discharge to a publicly owned treatment works. • Reinjectlon into the ground -either onslte or off site. • Treatment followed by reinjection into the ground -either onsite or off site. • Solar evaporation. • Incineration. -3- '. t . ' • Surface discharge. • Treatment followed by surface discharge. • Disposal at a Class I land disposal site. ... • Disposal at a Class 11-1 land disposal site -with or without treatment. • Disposal at a permitted hazardous ·waste treatment faclllty. • Reuse as industrial process water. • Future treatment of drinking water at the tap. These remedial alternatives went through an initial screening which resulted in the consideration of only five alternatives which appeared to be cost effective for an interim remedial solution. The five selected were pretreatment and discharge to a publicly owned treatment works; treatment and reinjection into the ground; treat and surface discharge; disposal at a Class I landflll; and disposal at a Class 11-1 landfill. After consideration of all the alternatives, the cost effectiveness, as well as the environmental impacts, the selected interim remedial solution ls to treat the extracted groundwaters to an acceptable level and discharge to a sanitary sewer where the waste would be co-mingled with existing sanitary sewer waste treated and disposed to the marine environment. Based on the fast-track findings, the BP A, in conformance with the Superfund regulations, issued a Rocord of Decision. This Record of Decision was noticed and public comment was solicited and received. It was then decided to proceed with the interim program to treat the extracted groundwaters and discharge these treated waters to a publicly owned sewer system. SA WPA'S ROLB IN THB lNTBRIM PROGRAM SA WPA, in the execution of its responsibilities to improve and protect the ground- waters of the Santa Ana River Basin and Its obligations to all those affected by the groundwaters, offered to the Department of Health Services to act as Its agent In the implementation of an interim remedial program for the treatment and disposal of the Stringfellow waste. Under contract to the DOHS, SA WPA prepared an RFP and solicited proposals from professional engineering firms for the design and construction management of a pretreatment facility which would treat the extracted groundwaters to the prescribed limits set forth the proposed permit requirements to meet SAWPA's pretreatment ordinances. Five highly qualified professional engineering firms were e~aluated to perform the tasks outlined In the RFP. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers of Pasadena, were selected to provide the necessary engineering services. On August 21, 1984, the Board of Directors of SAWPA issued a contract with the concurrence of the Department of Health Services to James M. Montgomery for the design and construction management of the pretreatment faciliites. . . I ' ... Plan& and &peclflcations were prepared for the treatment facilities and equipment, materials and installation bids were received In October, 1984. SA WPA primarily became involved with the Stringfellow site because of its Interest In protecting basin groundwater quality. Through use of the SARI line, SA WPA saw an opportunity to prevent tHe contaminated groundwater from the Stringfellow site from reaching the grqyndwater within the Santa Ana River Basin. SA WPA required the services of consulting engineering firms to design and manage construction of an interim ground~ater treatment faclllty at String- fellow to reduce the heavy metal and organic concentrations in the leachate and groundwater to acceptable levels for discharge into the SARI line. The treatment facility ls scheduled for completion of construction and beginning of operation by January 1, 1985. INTERIM TRBATMBNT AND DISPOSAL PROGRAM OBJBCTIVBS Detalls of the treatablllty of the leachate and groundwater generated at the Stringfellow site are contained ln the following four reports: "Bench-Scale Treatablllty Studies for Liquid Wastes at the Stringfellow Site" final report to the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, July, 1982, by James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc.; "Proposed Treatment Requirements for Treated Stringfellow Wastes" final report to Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), March, 1984, by Lowry and Associates; "Fast-Track Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, Stringfellow Site, Riverside, California" final report to EPA, May, 1984, CH2M Hill; and "Test Program Summary Report: I. Mid-Canyon Interceptor Well Field Pilot Testing, II. Treatabillty Testing, Stringfellow Site, Riverside County, California, final report to EPA, August, 1984, CH2M Hill. The objectives of this interim program are to de~ign previously selected groun~water treatment faclllties ln a cost-effective and well engineered manner, consistent with the treatablllty l'.ecommendations provided in these reports. The overall purpose of the project is to provide adequate treatment of the leachate flow up to 130 gpm, generated from the on-site extraction wells and the groundwater flows generated from the interceptor wells. Essentially, the project consists of the design and construction of lime preci- pitation facllltles for the removal of the heavy metals fraction and granular activated carbon adsorption for the removal of the organics fraction, as presented in the foregoing treatablllty studies. The liquid waste treatment system consists of two sequential operations: first. a precipitation step to remove the heavy metals fraction contained in the leachate from the on-site extraction wells, and second, a GAC adsorption step to remove the organic fraction contained in both the on-site and the mid-canyon groundwater extraction wells. The precipitation process consists of equalization tanks to accept the influent from the wells, influent pumping to a rapid mix unit for addition of precipitants and flocculants, flocculation and clarification and sand filtration. From the --·--·--·---,,.-·--· --···--------·-··---·---- . .. . . .... ' filters, the effluent is pumped to equalization tanks of the carbon system. Sludges from the clarifier wlll be dewatered in filter presses, with the filtrate recycled to the Initial equalization tanks. For the carbon system, the effluent from the preclpltatlon step wlll be blendA<t with influent from the mid-canyon wells, which at the present time only have organic contamination. The blended waters are then pumped into the carbon beds, with the efficiency of removal recorded by a TOC analyzer. Effluent from the carbon beds wlll be stored on-site prior to truck transport to the SARI" line. Spent carbon from the carbon adsorption system wlll be returned to the supplier for thermal destruction or regeneration. Sludges from the lime precipitation system will be hauled to an authorized Class I f aclllty. The final or ultimate cleanup program ls scheduled for determination before the end of 1985. This interim program may be incorporated as an integral part of the final program, but ls mainly designed to prevent further ground- water contamination pending implementation of the final cleanup program . . · ( TREATED WATER TESTED TWICE TO VERIFY COM- PLIANCE BEFORE TRUCKING JURURA MTS INTERIM PRETREATMENT FACILITIES -0.187 MGD ! D.TP..ACTION WELLS SOO FEET 12 HILES ( TREATED WATER TESTED BEFORE DISPOSAL TO SEWER TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE I I h c.J 8 s cal en t!) 1:1,~ 510 I I SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR 36 MILES (APPROX) PROPOSED. OCSD TREAnfENT PLANT NO. 1 FOUNTAIN VALLEY OCSD 4 -MILE LAND OtrrFALL TREATED WATER TREATED AT CSDOC SECONDARY TREATMENT PLANT . • OCSD S -MILE OCEAN OtrrFALL US EPA & STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES INTERIM PRETREATMENT AND DISPOSAL ( . . FOR : ·. ···Ir I STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE; SITE ' . ... ,, t· -.; .... ' -· RE:· AGENDA ITEM #14..; ALL DISTRICTS ATTACHED ARE ADDITIONAL COMMUNICATIO NS TO BE RECEIVED AND FILED ~E STRINGFELLOW WASTE DISPOSAL SITE. 7j)fii~ City of Huntington Beach 1";,w~¥ .. ~ :~:l·· ~ ~' ~"~ 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 >~• .{;~::. ~; OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Cii~ .·.~ •"' December 5, 1984 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92709 Dear Directors: Telephone (714) 536·5553 At our meeting of December 3, 1984, the City Council of Huntington Beach directed me to request a written response to our resolution approved on '...,.; November 19. As I am sure you remember, our resolution requested the Orange County Sanitation District to reconsider its action in approving the dis- charge of pre-treated groundwater from the Stringfellow Hazardous waste Disposal site into the Pacific Ocean at Huntington Beach. The resolution further requested that the California Department of Health Services prepare a complete environmental impact report for that portion of the cleanup project which affects Orange County. This is a matter of extreme importance to us; we, therefore, request that it be given your utmost attention. Sincerely, ~ Ruth S. Bailey Mayor Chairman District 11 cc: City Council City Administrator RSB:JC:bb Anjo, Japan SISTER CITIES \Y ailermtla. \c~w Z1~aland --~ 11-27-84 Richard Edgar, Chairman Orange County Sanitation Directors 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA. 92701 Dear l~.Lr. Edgar: I note from the press that the Orange County Sanitation Supervisors have "approved a permit to allow treated water from the Stringfellow hazardous waste site" to be dumped off the coast of Orange County beginning January, 1985. . . ' ' I understand from the press th!:lt approval wl')s made ,with·,. out public hearings or a proper Environmental Impact Report. I object to the above noted procedure. Eublic hearings and an environmental report may not be legally required, but common sense and common ethics would suggest that they be used. I hope it is still possible for your co~ittee to hold public hearings and to obtain a reliable environmen- tal impact statement. S~n~~rely, _. ., c_c~~-z__~~ --~c__~- Charles Allen CC. Harriet Wieder, Chairman Charles A. Allen 710 Catalina AYenue Seal Beach, CA 90740 Orange County Board of Supervisors BARBARA BROWN MEMBER,FOUNTAIN VALLEY CITY COUNCIL I\'ovember 2, 1 S.84 Dee.r Lr. Sylvester: I a.r.i formally requesting. that r.o ac tiop be t~ken in re~ard to the pror.-osal tha. t \·1ould bri~r~ Strin_c·fello 1:i waste ua ter into Plant 1 of the Orar.'.~e Coupt~·' Sanitation District until a t:norour-J: a~c complete Enviro~men tal Impe.c t Henort has been <ione. I feel that it is essential ths.t not only t.he corr.:·~un it:r of Fountain Valley but also the en tire C ourity of Ci~.~;,r~:-e :)e e..ssurecl that every effort h:is been provide0 to rorotec t their heal th and well-be in~. Sincerely, ( NOT PAINTED AT TAXPAYERS EXPENSE ) COMMITTEE 1.0. NUMBER 840735 ;;;, CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY CIVIC CENTER (714) 963-8321 10200 SLATER AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 December 10, 1984 Ms. Rita Brown Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 5174 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Ms. Brown: At the Fountain Valley City Council Meetings of November 20, 1984, and December 4, 1984, the City Council publicly went on record as opposing the transport of the toxic wast materials from outside Orange County and processing them in this area. Attached for your records are Excerpts of Minutes from both of these meetings. Very truly yours, CITY OF F~IN VALLEY ~~ Evelyn cClendon City Clerk EMcC:ka Attachments -2 cc: Councilman Neal ;- / EXCERPT OF MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY An Adjoumed meeting of the City Council of the City of Fountain Valley was held on November 20, 1984 ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NEAL, VOSS, SCOTT., NIELSEN, BROWN ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None SCHEDULED MATTERS COUNCIL COMMENTS Orange County Sanitation District Councilman Neal read a portion of. a report that he has prepared as the City's representative to the Orange County Sanitation District in regard to the Stringfellow Dump. Council- man Neal stated he attended a Joint Board Meeting of the Orange County Sanitation District on November 14, 1984. There were two major issues for discussion before the Joint·Boards. One was acceptance of the discharge of Stringfellow Dump and the other was the formation of District 14. He stated a short history of the Stringfellow Dump has been made available to the Council. He stated that at the Board Meeting a motion was made by Supervisor Stanton and seconded by Ruth Bailey to not accept the Stringfellow wastewater until after a complete EIR. He stated the motion was supported by five members of the board including himself. He stated the great majority of the board voted against the motion which lost. He stated a motion was then made to accept the Stringfellow waste providing proper safeguards were taken. The motion was approved. He stated in line with Council's policy of no expansion of the Sanitation District Plant in Fountain Valley he voted no against the connection of the Stringfellow Dump at the Sanitation Plant. Supervisor Stanton and Ruth Bailey of Huntington Beach also voted against the motion. In his report, Councilman Neal recommended that the City Council go on record with the press supporting Roger Stanton's letter and that a study session be held with the representatives of the Sanitation District and the members of the City Council. Councilman Neal made a motion to support Supervisor Stanton's letter and position on the Stringfellow Dump and that a study session be held with the represenatives of the Sanitation District. The motion was seconded by Councilwoman Brown and unanimously approved. Mayor Nielsen requested that the City Attorney provide Council with what other legal alternatives are available to the Council. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss. CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY I, Kathleen A. Atwood (Deputy) City Clerk of the City of Fountain Valley hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of the minute entry on record in this office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of December , 19!.!..__. ) ~z=d~ .. ,,,___tf U~/ (De uty) City Clerk City of Fountain Valley. ,/ / EXCERPT OF MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY A Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Fountain Valley was held on December 4, 1984 ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NEAL, VOSS, NIELSEN, SCOTT ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: BROWN SCHEDULED MATTERS PUBLIC APPEARANCES--ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Stringfellow Dump Mr. Alan Katz, 1958 Pellican Avenue, Fountain Valley, addressed the council on behalf of a number of citizens of fountain valley expressing their objection to the bringing in to the community of toxic wastes from outside orange county and processing them in this area. He indicated he had already appeared before the Huntington Beach City Council and that city advised that they had already unanimously resolved that they were against bringing the toxic Stringfellow wastes to their city, at least until a satisfactory EIR had been completed. He requested this Council to go on record as expressing the same objections, and to further go on record as indicating that even if an EIR is favorable, that it is still opposed to the bringing in of contaminated wastes to our city due to the potential of leaks, spills, breaks, and potential accidents. Mayor Nielsen stated he was happy to inform Mr. Katz that the Fountain Valley City Council had passed the same motion at the last meeting on November 20, 1984. He stated the City is supporting the County's attempt to get an EIR done. He stated at this point it is in the hands of the attorneys and the City will move in that direction. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss. CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY I, Kathleen A. Atwood (Deputy) City Clerk of the City of Fountain Valley hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of the minute entry on record in this office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of December , 19~. ~puty City Clerk City of Fountain Valley / t" i ~ REVISED AGENDA ITEM il3: 12/12/84 (13) Items relative to proposed formation of District No. 14: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Verbal report of Select Committee to Advise the Staff on agreement wit ~ IRWD re formation of proposed District No. 14 (b) Consideration of action on Committee recommendations: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Interim Report of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff dated December 12, 1984, re Proposed Formation of District No. 14 (copy attached) (2) Consideration of motion further amending the Joint Boards' action of August 8, 1984, as amended on November 14, 1984, declaring intent to approve an amendment to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, changing the basis of calcul·ating the joint ownership percentage from flow and assessed valuation to flow only, contingent upon execution of an agreement with the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) providing for the proposed formation of County Sanitation District No. 14, 1ita further provi ~ that any such change would be concurrent with the effective date of formation of the new District. (3) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement with a consulting firm to prepare the formal engineer's report required for public proceedings relative to the proposed formation of District No. 14, for further consideration by the Boards, the cost of said report to be paid by IRWD (4) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solici t proposals and negotiate an agreement with a consulting firm to prepare an Environmental Impact Report required for public proceedings relative to the proposed formation of District No. 14, for further consideration by the Boards, the cost of said report to be paid by IRWD (5) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-207, establishing Di9trict No. 14 Suspense Fund for payment of expenditures incurred on behalf of proposed District No. 14 in connection with the proposed formation thereof (copy attached) DISTRICT 7 ONLY (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine Ranch Water District, dated November 19, 1984, agreeing to pay the sum of $867,696.00 to the District for their incremental share of construction of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Schedule "A", Contract No. 7-8, awarded to Steve Bubalo Construction Company by the Board on November 14, 1984. See page "Q" (d) Verbal report of staff and General Counsel on feasibility of modifying the construction contract for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8 to delete capacity for District No. 14/IRWD in the Von Karman reach, as requested by IRWD (e) Consideration of actions on Committee recommendations: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement with a consulting firm to revise the District No. 7 Master Plan of Trunk Sewers Environmental Impact Report to address the proposed capacity increase and extension of the Main Street Relief Subtrunk Sewer from Von Karman to the Peters Canyon Wash to provide alternative service connection for proposed District No. 14, the cost of said report to be paid by IRWD, for further consideration by the Boards -8- December 12, 1984 COUNTY SANITATION DISTR ICTS of ORANGE COU NTY. CALIFOR NIA PO BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALI FORNI A 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 171 4 ) 5 40-2910 1714) 962-2411 INTERIM REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF RE: Proposed Formation of District No. 14 At the November meeting, the Joint Boards approved a conceptual agreement with IRWD and extended the date previously established by the Boards for a commitment by IRWD relative to the proposed formation of District No . 14, from December 1 to December 12, 1984. The District No. 7 Board also awarded Schedule A of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, wh ich includes capacity for IRWD, subject to receipt of a written obligation from IRWD to pay $867,696.00, the incremental amount over bid Schedule B which would have provided capacity for District No. 7 only. A check in the amount of $867,696.00 for IRW0 1 s incrementa l share of Contract No. 7-8 was deposited with the Districts on Tuesday, December 11th . The Board also directed the Deputy Chief Engineer and General Counsel to determine the feasibility and legality of a change in the awa r ded contract to delete IRWD 1 s participation in the Von Karman reach of the project, so that the District No. 14/IRWD capacity in the sewer would only be in the Main Street reach from Von Karman westerly to the proposed South Irvine Lift Station, as requested by IRWD, and to report back to the Board at the December meeting. Staff has been meeting with the contractor for the Von Karman project to determine the feasibility of accommodating IRWD 1 s request to eliminate the capacity in Schedule A in the Von Karman reach of that project. Following meetings with the contractor and IRWD, it has been determined that such a change is not feasible. The Staff and General Counsel have also been meeting with the representatives of IRWD in an attempt to work out the final lan guage of the agreement for the formation of proposed District No. 14. We have not yet reached agreement on the final language, but staff was given further direction on the outstanding issues by the Committee at its meeting last Monday, December 10th, and is continuing to meet with IRWD to complete the agreement for submittal to the respective governing boards. A major development with regard to the proposed agreement is that IRWD has advised us that they would not be in a position to approve or execute the agreement until t he appraisal on the treatment plant land is completed. We have engaged a firm to do the appraisal and they have advised us that it will take approximately 60 days. Interim Report of the Select Committee December 12, 1984 Page 2 The Committee has considered IRWD's request for a delay in execution of the agreement for the proposed formation of District No. 14 and is of the opinion that, inasmuch as IRWD has deposited the $867,696.00 for the District No. 14/IRWD incremental share of the Von Karman Trunk, they can recommend extending the December 12th deadline set by the Boards for approval of the agreement . The Committee, however, believes that selection procedures for interviewing consultants to prepare the necessary engineering and environmental reports required before public proceedings on the proposed formation could proceed, should not be delayed, and that IRWD should deposit the estimated cost of said ($500,000.00) in a District No. 14 Suspense Fund. The Committee, therefore, recommends the following actions: 1 Amend the previous Boards' action declaring their intent to change the Joint Works Equity Formula from a combined flow/assessed valuation basis to a flow only basis, deleting the provision requiring IRWD to execute an agreement for the formation of proposed District No. 14 by December 12, 1984, and further providing that such Joint Works Equity Formula policy change shall be concurrent with the effective date of formation of proposed District No. 14. 1 Authorize the respective Selection Committees to solicit proposals and negotiate agreements for later consideration by the Boards for the following services: 1 Revisions to the District No. 7 Master Plan EIR to address the proposed capacity increase in the Main Street Relief Subtrunk from Von Karman to the Peters Canyon Wash and to provide alternative servi~e connection for proposed District No. 14. 1 Engineers Report for proposed formation of District No. 14. • Environmental Impact Report for proposed District No. 14 . • Establish a County Sanitation District No. 14 Suspense Fund to pay for formation costs incurred on behalf of proposed District No. 14 to be funded by IRWD. It is noted that the above actions are under the December 12th Agenda Item Nos. 9 (o) and (p) which authorize the Selection Committee to negotiate with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional design work to provide for District No. 14/IRWD capacity in the Main Street Relief Subtrunk at the South I rvine Lift Station, to be paid by IRWD. Respectfully submitted, Richard B. Edgar, Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin, Vice Joint Chairman Don Roth Don Saltarelli David G. Sills RESOLUTION NO. 84-207 ESTABLISHING DISTRICT NO. 14 SUSPENSE FUND A RFSOLUTION OF THE BOABDS OF DIRECTORS OF CX>UNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SUSPENSE FUND FOR PAYMENT OF EXPENDITURES INCURRED ON BEHALF OF PROPOSED DISTRICT NO. 14 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED FORMATION THEREOF WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, ·5, 6, 7 and 11 and the Irvine Ranch Water District have under co~sideration the pr·oposal to form new County Sanitation District No. 14 to provide sewerage service to the Irvine area1 and, WHEREAS, it is necessary to incur certain expenditures and procure services and supplies on behalf of proposed District No. 14 to prepare the required engineering and environmental reports for public proceedings relative to further consideration of the proposed formation of District No. 14. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby authorized and directed to establish a suspense fund for the purpose of the payment of obligations in connection with the proposed formation of County Sanitation District No. 141 and, Section 2. That payment of obligations incurred on behalf of proposed District No. 14 shall be funded by deposits to said District No. 14 Suspense Fund by the Irvine Ranch.Water District1 and, Section 3. That County Sanitat~on District No. 7 be, and is hereby, appointed agent to act for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6 and 111 and, Section 4. That the Director of Finance is hereby authorized to pay obligations incurred and to certify claims and forward to the Orange County Auditor-Controller "...,_) for payment in accordance with provisions of Resoluti"on No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 12, 1984. December 12, 1984 Directors SUPERVISOR, FIRST DISTRICT ROGER R. STANTON ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF" SUPERVISORS ORANGE COUNTY HALL OF' ADMINISTRATION 10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701·4061 PHONE 834·3110 (AREA CODE 714) County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Fellow Directors: On November 14, 1984, a majority of the Districts voted against my motion to delay further consideration of the State Department of Health Services (OOHS) plan to discharge, under permit from the Sp.nta Ana Watershed Project Authority, pretreated wastewater from the Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Disposal Site into the Orange County Sanitation Districts' Treatment System until an EIR was completed. I respectfully request that the directors reconsider this failed motion in light of new information and new questions which have come to my attention in the intervening weeks. ·· I will again state my support for the cleanup of the Stringfellow Site. However, the proposed method of cleanup should be the subject of public review. I am compelled to remind you that the State's proposed "interim" project was selected by the EPA and OOHS without either having conducted any public meetings of any kind in Orange County. The people of Orange County deserve better. If the State would agree to conduct an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on the "interim" project, then our citizens would be afforded the opportunity to submit formal questions and comments on the draft EIR and be allowed to participate in. formal public hearings on the proposed "interim" project. Within the EIR, formal mitigation measures and the development of alternatives to the proposed "interim" project would have to be proposed and evaluated. FOUN1)),INVALLEY-GARDEN GROVE-Mlr:J.NAY CITY-SANTA ANA-TUSTIN -WESTMINSTER · .. ·r:···'· •• ' '•'. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 2 ~ December 12, 1984 The following sununarizes the significant new information and questions which support my renewed request for State preparation of an Environmental Impact Report prior to the start-up of the "interim" project: 1. The .. interim" project was supposed to continue for three years (November 14, 1984, Districts' Staff Report, page 4). I have since been told by a representative of the EPA that costs of the "interim" project are to be amortized over a 3 to 5 year period. In addition, the likelihood for OOHS to select a variation of the "interim" project as the longer term project is undeniably great. According to a representative of the Orange County Water District, this could mean a 20 year project. Are the Districts prepared for such a long-term connnitment? 2. Nowhere in the Districts' Staff Report did it mention that Stringfellow waters contain low levels of radiation. A November 28, 1984, Los Angeles Times article mentioned that a representative of OOHS had stated that radiation had been found in well water near the Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site. This was confirmed to me by a OOHS representative on December 3-, 1984. Would this radiation pose a danger to Orange County? .. 3. The Districts' Staff Report description of the engineer's estimate of speed of the Stringfellow plume advancing towards potable water was contradicted by the November 28, 1984 Los Angeles Times article. Which is correct? If the engineers were incorrect on this matter, could there be unforseen design errors in the proposed project which could adversely affect Orange County? v 4. Representatives of the Orange County Water District reported to me that they believe that the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) is intending to charge the EPA and OOHS more than their actual cost to conduct the "interim" project in order to help pay for an extension of the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) Line which would run near the Stringfellow Site. This may help insure that the selection of the longer term Stringfellow Cleanup Project would be a modified continuation of the "interim" project, where pretreated Stringfellow wastewaters would no longer have to travel by truck to SARI discharge points, but could be discharged into the SARI Line directly. This means the Districts could become involved in the long-term handling and treating of Stringfellow wastewaters. Also, could SAWPA's charging more than their actual cost help insure the extension of the SARI Line to expand business, industrial, and residential development opportunities in the vicinity of the extension, thus leading to the potential need to expand the Districts two treatment plants? 5. If the pretreated Stringfellow wastewater to be put into the SARI Line is simply brackish, salty water, as is claimed by the EPA and OOHS, why couldn't this brackish water be desalinized right at the Stringfellow site and reinjecued there (perhaps serving as a barrier between the Stringfellow plume and the Chino Basin water table) instead of piping it to Orange County? An EIR would allow for consideration of this and other alternatives. •, . . ' :'.~:~··.,~'~.·~:~~~.~~ ~·:1,~ ::~~~.~~:j~:·~~ ~ ~·, ·_ ~ .. +:~ ~.'.: ~~·;.::~~·~.~ .~.;~· .. ~/,~·.-:•/~·~~.:: .. :~7<.~~-~~~:~-~·.~.: .-~~:.;:;: . . ... .. ( . , "• ~ . ·-.· ~ -·· -... · ..•. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 3 December 12, 1984 6. Finally, I have received conflicting information regarding the plans for the ultimate disposal of all the Stringfellow waste water after it reaches Orange County. Where would the waste water actually end up? Recommended Actions In light of these issues and questions, I recommend that the Districts take the following actions: 1. Rescind the action of November 14, 1984, giving conditional authorization to SAWPA to permit OOHS to discharge pretreated Stringfellow wastewaters into the Districts' treatment system. 2. Direct staff to immediately notify SAWPA, OOHS, and the EPA of the recission. 3. Delay further consideration of the matter until OOHS completes an EIR on the proposed "interim" project and conducts public hearings on the proposed "interim" project in Orange County. ectfully submitted, Orange County Supervisor, First District RRS:smd Attachment: November 14, 1984 letter , ' • ·''"'• ' '~A=' ,,,, ..... • f. \. ,-; ... ,..) •I ,.,. ,) • • ~--1~. ·. 4• ...... SUPERVISOR, F"IRST DISTRICT ROGER R. STANTON ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF" SUPERVISORS ORANGE COUNTY HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 10 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701·4061 PHONE 634·3110 (AREA CODE 714) NOVEMBER 14, 1984 BOARD OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS: I HEREBY RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE DIRECTORS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS SUPPORT MY MOTION TO DELAY. ANY CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING A PERMIT TO PROCESS AND TREAT (IN ORANGE COUNTY) PRE-TREATED GROUND WATER FROM THE STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SITE. I ALSO ASK THE DIRECTORS TO INSIST THAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TO IDENTIFY THE POTENTIAL ENVIRON- MENTAL HAZARDS TO ORANGE COUNTY THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PROPOSED TREATMENT PROCESS AND TO DESCRIBE TECHNICAL ALTERNATIVES TO THE ONE BEING PROPOSED. .. . THERE ARE SEVERAL POINTS TO SUPPORT THIS REQUEST. FIRST, THERE IS NO IMMEDIATE URGENCY FOR THE DISTRICTS TO TAKE ACTION. THE GROUND WATER IN ORANGE COUNTY IS NOT CURRENTLY BEING THREATENED BY STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE SEEPAGE. MANY OF THE RESIDENTS .. IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE STRINGFELLOW DUMP ARE ALREADY TAKING SEVERAL PRECAUTIONS, INCLUDING USING BOTTLED WATER. ALSO, TREATMENT OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE IS CURRENTLY BEING CONDUCTED AT THE SITE. EXCESS WASTEWATER IS BEING TRUCKED TO A REMOTE AREA IN CENTRAL CALIFORNIA. CURRENTLY THE STRINGFELLOW SITE IS BEING CLEANED UP AT A RATE OF 31 GALLONS A MINUTE AND AT A COST OF $10,000 A DAY. A DELAY BY THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS IN CONSIDERING THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES PROPOSAL WILL NOT HALT NOR SLOW THE VITALLY IMPORTANT CLEAN UP CURRENTLY BEING CONDUCTED AT THE STRINGFELLOW SITE. A MORE CAUTIOUS CONSIDERATION OF THE STATE'S PROPOSAL MERELY GIVES US A CHANCE TO EVALUATE THE POTENTIAL RISKS TO OUR RESIDENTS HERE IN ORANGE COUNTY. THE OBVIOUS REASON THAT THE STATE WOULD PREFER THIS BOARD TO ACT IMMEDIATELY IS MONEY. THE STRINGFELLOW SITE IS BEING CLEANED UP fOLJNt!ijN VALLEY-GARDEN GROVE -M'DNPlf aTV-SANTAANA-TUSTN-WESTMINSTER ::, .. ;.~:J~:4-;.'J;:;.-~::.:; ~~;h·~~·--?:.~d:;.,, ~-~~:.;_"';~~t:~~'~}.:.:.. -.:: ... ~-....... ; .. ,. :!':~·.:·.. ...... . -! • . .• · . '--:..·.· -.:.· .-.-·~l ·: ..... _.;...~.-:· •· .... ". :,<,;! ... -•. ~--'!~··· ~ ;,·:···.::_:....>.-.-.: "'··~-..,..~;.~_, .: .. · ......... ·.~·-~~~ ~~-;:._.---·~--.-·~ .. -:.< .. :~ .. ,. __ : .. ,~-~ ·.,. .. AT A RATE OF 31 GALLONS A MINUTE AT A COST OF $10,000 A DAY. THE STATE PROPOSAL WOULD ACCELERATE THE CLEANUP TO A RATE OF 131 GALLONS PER DAY AND APPARENTLY SAVE MONEY. SECOND, OUR DELAY AND REQUEST FOR A STATE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WOULD REVEAL ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT. IT WOULD ASSVRE ORANGE COUNTY CITIZENS THAT THEY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD AT FORMAL PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THIS IMPORTANT ISSUE. UNTIL TODAY, VERY LITTLE INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED PROJECT HAS GONE OUT TO ORANGE COUNTY CITIZENS. I BELIEVE THAT IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT OUR CITIZENS ARE FULLY INFORMED OF THE STATE'S PROPOSED ACTION. ALSO, ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION SHOULD BE AIRED. THE PUBLIC CAN THEN OFFER REASONED, INTELLIGENT COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES. THIRD, THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WOULD PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP ANSWERS TO SEVERAL CURRENTLY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS. SOME BASIC QUESTIONS THAT MUST BE ANSWERED INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: o WHAT ARE THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS OF THE PROPOSED TREATMENT PLAN? o WHAT SAFETY AND ENGINEERING ASSUMPTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE? HOW WOULD THESE ASSUMPTIONS STAND UP TO THE SCRUTINY OF AN EIR? o WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE SEWER LINE BRJNGING STRINGFELLOW WASTE WATER THROUGH ORANGE COUNTY WERE TO RUPTURE IN THE ANAHEIM AREA WHERE MUCH OF ORANGE COUNTY'S DRINKING WATER PERCOLATES INTO THE UNDERGROUND WATER TABLE? o WHAT ARE THE RISKS TO ORANGE COUNTY BEACH COMMUNITIES? o WHAT ARE THE COST ESTIMATES OF A CLEAN UP OF SUCH ACCIDENTS IN ORANGE COUNTY? o WHAT ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT PLANS CAN BE DEVELOPED WHICH WOULD MINIMIZE SUCH RISKS AND/OR AVOID THE ORANGE COUNTY AREA? FINALLY, A DELAY WOULD ENABLE THE STATE LEGISLATURE TO RETHINK THEIR 1982 AUTHORIZATION OF THAT PORTION OF AB 26 WHICH EXEMPTED THE "EMERGENCY" CLEAN UP AND TREATMENT OF STRINGFELLOW WASTEWATER FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). IF ANYTHING, STANDARDS MORE STRINGENT THAN CEQA SAFEGUARDS SHOULD BE MADE TO APPLY TO THE DISPOSITION OF STRINGFELLOW WASTEWATER. ALTHOUGH THE STATE LEGISLATURE SHOULD NOT HAVE EXEMPTED STRINGFELLOW FROM CEQA STANDARDS, THE EXEMPTION IS PERMISSIVE AND NOT MANDATORY. THEREFORE, THE STATE DEPARTMENT 2 . . . ·:-: . .. . .. ~~~~ ~~i1.·J;~~~:·-Ai.~; .. ~:~ .... '.".~~i .. ~~~.~; ... ~~t_._;,_:-.~ :. ~;;~~-... ~~~ .. ~-.~·'.L.J:.....~-·._,-·-N'.i_t;>:. •. :..i:::.~.'-'·-.:.-•. ,.. --' . . .• ., . OF HEALTH SERVICES CAN STILL PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REQUESTED THEM TO DO SO. IN CONCLUSION, I BELIEVE A DELAY WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOR PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WOULD BENEFIT ORANGE COUNTY IN FOUR SIGNIFICANT WAYS: 1) IT WOULD CAUSE NO DELAY IN THE CURRENT IMPORTANT CLEAN UP OF THE STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE; AND 2) IT COULD REVEAL ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND IT WOULD AFFORD LOCAL CITIZENS THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD; AND 3) IT WOULD ALLOW TIME TO ANSWER SEVERAL UNANSWERED QUESTIONS; AND FINALLY : ..... ~ 4) IT WOULD ENABLE THE STATE LEGISLATURE AN OPPORTUNITY TO RETHINK THEIR DECISION TO PERMIT THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES TO TAKE ACTIONS LEADING THE THE DISPOSAL OF STRINGFELLOW WASTE WATER WITHOUT PREPARING AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. THE FOLLOWING MOTION IS OFFERED FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE JOINT BOARD OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITIATION DISTRICTS. 1. DIRECT STAFF TO REQUEST THAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES PREPARE A FULL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THAT PORTION OF THEIR PROPOSED STRINGFELLOW CLEAN UP PROJECT WHICH AFFECTS ORANGE ~OUNTY TO ALLOW FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE AND INPUT, AND THE CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES. 2. TABLE FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS OF THE STATE'S REQUEST. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ROGER R. STANTON COUNTY SUPERVISOR, FIRST DISTRICT RRS:SMB 3 -~~;:~: .. ; ~~;.{_~~;·~~: i~~.: .:.'~:;_~_~_;;. :·. -~-~-:g:~·. ~ ~~,·;:~:T ... : ~··. F;\t~:~~·:·'. ·. . .. . .· :~~::::. ' ~ :-' . . . ...... _---.;..,,.: _ _c_ .. -· .·· ......... _,~ ... ,,..,;. .... ·."·:':"'-_;;~;,.~t, ..... :;7.: .. ~ ... -'."·~'~·~·:~'·,...,,: ... ' .. -;. -p;·~. " _!_ •• • -.., .. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN DECEMBER 12, 1984 1) ANNOUNCE REAPPOINTMENT OF PHILIP MAURER TO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD. I AM PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE THAT PHIL MAURER, NEWPORT BEACH MAYOR AND DIRECTOR ON DISTRICT No. 5 AND 7 BOARDS, WAS RECENTLY REAPPOINTED TO THE CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, SANTA ANA REGION No. 8, BY GOVERNOR DEUKMEJIAN. 2) JOINT STUDY SESSION WITH FOUNTAIN VALLEY CITY COUNCIL. I HAVE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM FOUNTAIN VALLEY MAYOR, BEN NIELSEN, REQUESTING A JOINT STUDY SESSION BETWEEN THE COUNCIL AND A COMMITTEE OF DIRECTORS. THE COUNCIL HAS REQUESTED THE MEETING TO DISCUSS PROPOSED PLANT No. 1 EXPANSION HERE IN FOUNTAIN VALLEY, PROPOSED FORMATION OF NEW DISTRICT No. 14, THE STRINGFELLOW PROPOSAL, AND ODOR CONTROL MEASURES TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE DISTRICTS (NOTE THAT LATER IN THE AGENDA UNDER ITEM No. 12, MALCOLM-PERNIE WILL REPORT THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THEIR ODOR MITIGATION STUDY AND THE BOARD WILL CONSIDER SEVERAL ACTIONS AND A POLICY STATEMENT AS RECOMMENDED BY THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE). I HAVE ASKED THE SELECT COMMITTEE OF DIRECTORS TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS JOINT STUDY SESSION THAT WILL BE HELD SOME TIME AFTER THE FIRST OF THE YEAR. 1 3) BOARD ROOM SMOKING POLICY. As YOU PROBABLY READ IN THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE'S REPORT, THE COMMITTEE REVIEWED DIRECTOR COOPER'S REQUEST THAT THE BOARD ESTABLISH A SMOKING POLICY FOR THE BOARD ROOM. As YOU WILL SEE ON YOUR TABLES THIS EVENING, THE COMMITTEE DIRECTED THE STAFF TO DESIGNATE THE TWO TABLES IN THE REAR, CENTER OF THE BOARD ROOM, IMMEDIATELY BENEATH THE VENTILATION EXHAUST, AS A SMOKING AREA. THE BALANCE OF THE BOARD ROOM HAS BEEN DESIGNATED AS NON-SMOKING. 4) COMMITTEE MEETINGS. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL NOT MEET IN DECEMBER DUE TO THE HOLIDAY SEASON. THERE ARE NO OTHER SCHEDULED COMMITTEE MEETINGS, HOWEVER, THE JOINT SELECTION COMMITTEE AND THE DISTRICT No. 7 SELECTION COMMITTEE, MAY MEET AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIRMAN. 5) PRESENTATION OF ENERGY CONSERVATION AWARD BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON. INTRODUCE MR. STEVE NELSON OF EDISON COMPANY WHO WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT AN AWARD TO THE DISTRICTS FOR OUR ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM. 2 et' MEETING DATE December 12, 1984 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS I>-·, "' ------------ 1, 2 t 3 t 5 t 6 I 7 & 11 ·~ .-· . "DISTRICT 1 ~ J!L JO I NT BOARDS (CRANK), , , , , , , , HANSON, , , , , , ..,.......~ rJ (LUXEMBOURGER),GRISET •••••• ~ ~ (KENNEDY),,, ,,,SALTARELLI •• ~~-"' (WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,.,_~--~ DISTRICT 2 (MURPHY),,,,,,,WEDAA,,,,,,, ,/ _t:l_ ~ (OVERHO~T),,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,.~ ~ A-' (NEWTON),,, ••• ~ ••• ,,,,,_...--___ ~ -.:r-:- (NORBY)t••••••1CATLIN1•••••~ ~ ~~ (NELSONJ11111t1COOPER •••••• ~ (LUXEMBOURGERJ,GRISET.,,.,,~ ~ !MAHONEY),,,.,,HOLMBERG., •• ~ ~ ODLUM),,,,,,,,KAWANAMI,,,,~ ~ ADLER) I ••••••• NEAL. I. I I I I·~ (CULVER),,,,,,,PERRI 1111111.J:::::::: ~ ~ (BEYER)t••••111SMITH1111••• ~ __tJ_ (WIEDERJ1111111STANTON,,,11~ -Al DISTRICT 3 OVERHO~T)11111ROTH,,,,,,,, ~ COOPER •• I • I •• f4ELS8N I ••••• ~ THOMAS ,,,,,,,BAILEY,,,,,,~ RISNER),,,,,,,BROWNELL,,,,-/!fiiir NORBY),,,,,,,,CATLIN,,,,,,~ PERRY),,,,,,,1CULVER,,,,,,_.......-__ _ SEIDEL),,,,,,, ,,,,,, V" JARRELLJ,,,,,,GRIFFIN,,.,.~ LUXEMBOURGERJ,GRISET,,,,,,~ MAHONEY),,,,,,HOLMBERG,,,,~ (PARTIN) I ••• I I. llAUEL+. I I I I·~ (ADLER),,,,,,,,NEAL,,,,,,,,~ (FINLAYSON> OLSON,,,,,,,~ (SIRIANJ),,,,,,SAPIEN,,,,,,~ (WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,~ (LANDER) I I I ••••. SYLVIA ••• I I·- DISTRICT 5 (AGEE),,,,,,,,,MAURER,,,,,,~~rJ ~ (HART) ••••••••• ~ 11 I I I.·--- (WIEDER) ••••••• STANTON ••••• ~ DISTRICT 6 (SMITH),,,,,,,,WAHNER,,,,,,-k::::. ~ £N (cox> •••••••••• PLUMMER ••••• ~ (WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,~ DISTRICT 7 (BEYER). I I. 11 I .SMITH. I I I I •• ~ ~I'! _w_ (AGEE),,1••••••MAURER,,,,,,~ ~ (KENNEDY),,,,,,EDGAR,,,,,,,~ :JS[ (LUXEMBOURGERJ,GRISET,,,,,, .......--0.. !MILLER)),,,,,,,SILLS,,,,,,, ._,,,., ~ WIEDER ,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,~ GREEN),,,,,,,,WAHNER,,,,,,~ __ _ DISTRICT 11 !MANDIC) ••••••• BAILEY •••• II ,,,,,,,,~ __j_ FINLEY) ••• I I I ,.;+1811A3 I. I •• ·~ ~ WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ~ ~ '....,/ 12/12/84 (HART) I I I I I I I I .~ •• I I • I I I ___.... (THOMAS/MANDIC)BAILEY,,1••·~ (RISNER),,,,,,,BROWNELL, ••• ~:::: (NEWTON) I I I I'' ,"!'t:tel(, I 11 I I.' ~ (NORBY)t•••••••CATLJN,,,,,,~::::::: (NELSONJ1111111COOPER,,,,,,~ KENNEDYJ,,,,,,EDGAR,,,,,,,~ ___ !PERRY),,,,,,,,CULVER,,,,,,~:::: SEIDEL)t•••••• ••••••~ ---JARRELLJ,,,,,,GRIFFIN,,,,,~ ___ (LUXEMBOURGER),GRISET,,,,,,~ __ (CRANK),,,,,,,,HANSON,,,,,,~ __ __ (MAHONEY} I • I I I • HOLMBERG I I • ·~ --! PARTIN) I.• • I I I I it'A'tt!L I • I • I •• _-v---___ ---- 0 DLUH) •••••••• K AWANAM I •••• ~ __ __ AGEE) •• I ••• I I .MAURER •.•• I I·~ ---(ADLER) •• ,,,,,,NEAL,,,,,,,,~ ___ !COOPER) I I' I I I I 14EL361•. I ••• ·~ ---Fl NLAYSON J,,, .OLSON ••••••• ~ ___ CULVER),,,,,,.~ ••••••• ~ __ __ Ccox> •••• , ••••• PLUHHER ••••• -a;=-__ __ (OVERHOLTJ,,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,, ____ _ '!KENNEDY) I. I •• I SALTARELLI.·~ --SIRIANJ) •••••• SAPIEN •••••• ~ ___ MILLER},,,,,,,SILLS,,,,,,,..J:::::_ ___ (BEYER)~,,,,,,,SMITH,,,,,,,~ __ __ (WIEDER ,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,~ __ __ (LANDER ,,,,,,,SYLVIA,,,,,,~ ___ !FINLEY) •••• , •• ;nanAs •••••. ~ --- GREEN/SM I TH JI • WAHNER I I I •• ·~ -- MURPHY> ••••••• WEDAA ••••••• ~---- SIAEE: OTHERS: SYLVESTER I I • v --CLARKE •••••• ~ ___ DAWES I I •••• I ·-.!:::::. ---- ANDERSON. I I.~ --BUTLER •••••• ~ __ __ BROWN,,,,,,,~ ___ BAKER,,,,,,,~ ___ KYLE,,,,,,,.~ ___ YOUNG,,,,,,, ______ __ VON LANGEN V'" WINSOR,,,,,,~::::: STREED••••••-"""'"------ WOODRUFF I. I.~ --ATK I Ns •••••• ~ __ __ HOHENER,,,,, ______ __ HOWARD,,,,,, _____ __ HUNT I. I I I I. I ......- KEITH ••••••• ::::::::: KNOPF,,,,,,,~ __ __ LE BLANC,,,, ____ __ LINDSTROM,,•--__ LYNCH,,,,,,, MARTINSON, I.---- PEARCE •••••• ::::::::: PLEASE SIGN IN -DECEMBER 12, 1984 JOINT BOARD MEETING F I RM/ORGANIZAT I ON/AGE NCY Sec_F CJ4-z.µ\ ~ \ Ll OCWD VJww.!) • "-11/) ,41~ ~.t-~ -~Cr .o. llk... ~ cc~~ o ~ s:._ G"' ~ (.cl~ N ~l ~ ~P Ll _.1_ · r)I( c;~~lev -(]""" l }Jtfl. l>J ~ tJc..k_ --t-, ~ J~ S(3ft~"' (L,.~.J ~ .. .,) December 12, 1984 Joint Meeting Notes #4 -Recognition of Persons The Joint Chairman recognized Allen Katz , Bettie Nosek, Al Sat l er and Duane Wenck who stated they wished to address the Board with regard to Agenda Item No. 14 . #5(b) -Election of Chairmen pro tern DISTRICT 5 -Philip Maurer elected Chairman pro tern DISTRICT 6 -Ruthelyn Plummer elected Chairman pro tern DISTRICT 7 -David Sills elected Chairman pro tern DISTRICT 11 -Roger Stanton elected Chairman pro tern #7(a) -Report of the Joint Chairman (1) Joint Chairman Edgar announced that Director Philip Maurer , Newport Beach Mayor and Director on Districts 5 and 7 , was recently reappointed to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board , Santa Ana Region 8, by Governor Deukmejian . (2) Mr . Edgar also reported that he had received a letter from Fountain Valley Mayor , Ben Nielsen , requesting a joint st udy sessicnbetween the Counc i l and a committee of Directors . The Council has requested the meeting to discuss proposed Plant No . 1 expansion in Fountain Valley , proposed formation of new District No . 14 , the Stringfellow proposal , and odor control measures to be undertaken by the Districts . The Joint Chairman stated th at he had asked the Select Advisory Committee of Direc t ors to participate in this joint study that will be held sometime after the first of the year . (3) Joint Chairman Edgar reported that the Executive Committee reviewed Director Cooper 's request that the Board establish a smoking policy for the Board Room . He noted that the Committee directed the staff to designate the two t ables in the rear center of the Board Room , im med iately beneath the ventilation exhaust , as a smoking area, and the bal ance of the Board Room has been designated as non-smoking . Signs have been placed on all the tables indicating this . (4) Chairman Edgar then reported that the Executive Committee would not meet in December due to the holiday season . There are no other scheduled Committee meetings . However , the Joint Selection Committee and the District No . 7 Selection Committee may meet at the call of the Chairman . (5) The Chair then recognized Mr . Steve Nelson from Southern California Edison Company who presented an award to the Districts for their energy conservation program . Mr. Nelson indicated that he is the Area Manager for SCE in Fountain Valley . He stated that these awards are given to customers who receive significant results in management of electrical resources . The Sanitation Districts have achieved significant savings . Mr . Edgar said the Districts appreciated the award and pledged to continue their conservation program . (6) Mr . Edgar added that the Board of Supervisors approved the f ormation of District No . 13 that day . Would be effective about J an uary l , 1985 . The General Manager reported that lasi.. 1~eek i1e haa oeen in Washington, o .c . along wi.th other members of the AMSA Board of Directors to meet with William Ruckelshaus (sp?), EPA Administrator , who has resigned effective early in January . He said Lee Thomas who presently leads up the Superfund activities was not able to meet with us but we did get a commitment to pass on some of our A good deal of the meeting centered around funding activities with the current concern in Washington on the deficit in the national budget . They weren't very optimistic . It was their opinion that there wasn 't going to be many programs that will be approved . Are going to have to give up some funding if EPA 's Operation Budget is going to be cut. Mr . Sylvester added that another item they discussed were the audit problems with EPA . The main problem is after the auditors go through 5-10 years after t he project is complete, they overtur n the decisions that the program staff had approved years before. They are re ve rsing their decisions . They were sympathetic to that and hopefully we will make some progress there. The General Manager also met with several people with regard to the Districts ' 30l(h) waiver . Also talked to Frank Covington and as a r esult, a meeting has bee n set up in San Francisco that Friday . A member of our staff will be there as well as representatives from EPA to see if the 30l(h) waiver can 't be worked out . Mr . Sylvester advised that the staff would like to request that Consent Calendar item #9(c) be deleted from the agenda . Need to have some further discussions with the contractor . Re Agenda Item #15 , we are asking the Board to declare its intent to amend the Joint Ownership , Operation and Construction Agreement to include newly formed County Sanitation District No . 13 effective January l , 1985 . That Amendment would come back to the Board for approval at the January 9th Board Meeti ng . This is a result of · t he actio n today of the Board of Super- visors re District No . 13 . #7(c) -No report of the General Counsel #12(a)(l) -Verbal report of Malcolm-Pirnie Th e Chair recognized Dick Brownell, J~f La uria ~ Fra nk Dryden of Malcolm- Pirnie, consultants re odor mitigation at Plants 1 and 2 . They reported that t hey laid o u t a set of objectives identify i ng significant odor sources . They reveiwed existing data and collected additional data to recommend immediate actions and concurrently evaluate many different alternatives to come up with a long-term odor control plan to red uce the amount of odor complaints. Jeff Lauria gave a slide presentation with regard to Plant 1 odor problems . He said at Plant 1 there has been 69 complain ts over 34 man ths .. At Plant 2 have been 245 complaints over 34 months. ~~r>J>-G~~~. Cooper asked how many studies they ha d completed to date and Mr . Lauria answered about 6 . Also asked what the initial cost of the Florida facility was? Answered about $12 mil l ion for the entire plant 5 years ago . -2 - Director Neal asked when the primary treatment at Plant 2 was bui lt and when were the homes built? He was advised the the plant was built in the 1950 's and the homes were built subsequent to that . No EIR prepared as CEQA was not in effect at that time. Mr . Edgar advised that the Executive Committee reviewed their study and came up with five points . We have to go with the best technolog y we know . Recommend we cover al l primary cla rif iers and study every pla ce where digester gas is leaking . Items (a)(2)(a) thru (e) were then moved and seconded . Edgar added that it would mean $10 million of expansion but bel i eve there is existing money available that could do the job. Stanton thanked the Districts ' staff for conducting this odor study . Said Directors Brown and Nea l pressed very hard for this study . Director Neal said the City of Fountain Valley is tremendously pleased by the action of the Joint Board . Voice vote on motion . Motion carried . #12(b) -Re Redevelopment Agencies Chairman Edgar reported that we recognize a pass-through is acceptable but most agencies are reluctant to do that . The bulk of rede ve lopment agencies i nvolve industrial or commercial uses that ordinarily pay the Sanitation Districts for effluent. It is only residential areas where the re is a problem . The Executive Committee recommends adopting this policy. Direct or Cooper stated that there were 11 cities that did no t respond to the Di stricts ' request for input with regard to Redevelopmen t Agency projects and his Council had directed him to recommend to the Board that they have a complete evaluation presented by the staff at the City Mana ge rs' meeting so they can report back to their r espective Councils . Ch ai rm an Edgar stated that it has already been six months sin ce he had written and had received responses from more than half of the agencies . Sai d they are recommending a policy with several ways for each agency to respond. Director Partin added that this request was sent out in election time and he hadn 't even seen it . Said he would be in favor of postponing this a little while . Edgar stated this his letter was sent out lon g be fore a ny election . Director Holmberg stated that r ecommendation #3 leaves negotiation wi t h city managers open to other alternatives . The Seal Beach representative said they went over the recommended policy and it is q u ite comprehens ive . No . 3 opens this for discussion with the groups and will be part of the cooperation with the City Managers. Don Smith said his City has been wait i ng a long time for a policy on this and would like to have some action . Called for the question . It was moved and seconded to approve the Executive Committee recommendations . Point of information asked for --Could this become a complicated legal situation with each city? Tom Woodruff said he didn 't believe so . Said the process of trying to strike an ag r eement with many other agencies has been existing all along . The agency could choose or not choose . The agency has les s discretion now . Don't see any parti c u lar unique legal problems at all . Voi ce vote on the motion . Motion ca rried . Cooper voted no . -3- • #12(e)(l) -The Ge neral Ma nager repo rted that a t t he rate t hat some of the c hains are d ete ri o r a t i ng, if we wai t one mon th , i t might not be in the best in t erest of the Di s tricts . He a dded tha t th e staff i s aski n g fo r au t hority to award a c o ntra ct f o r thi s chai n wi th the concu r rence of the J oint Chairman and Gene r al Co unsel , prov id i ng that bids that come i n d o n ot exc e ed $1 ,445 ,000 . It was then mov ed and seconde d t o ap p rov e i t em s 1 2(c) t h ru (f). Mo t io n carried . #13 -Re Dist r ict No . 14 Chairman Edgar repo rted tha t they have reached s o me point s of con s e n su s . Re item 13(b)(2) the flow calculation should be s y nchr on iz ed with the Distri ct 14 formation . The on l y forma l a ction ne eded n ow is the crea ti o n of a su s pe nse fund . Re #13 (d)-Tom Dawes reported that the staff a nd Ge nera l Co un sel c ondu c ted negotiations with Steve Bubalo Construc t ion Co . t o s ee if th e y co ul d a g ree to a c ha n ge order to r e duce the s ize of pipe in Vo n Ka r ma n Ave n ue betwe en Main and Michelson . Th e cha nge order was request ed by I RWD . He a d vised that they we re unable t o r e a ch a mutually-satisfact or y c ha nge ord er . S t aff r e c o mme nds Sched u le A, as a wa r ded by Directors . It was t he n moved a n d seco nded to a p prove items 13(b)(l) -(5). Qu e stion asked wh y IRWD wan ted t o reduce the pipe si z e? Ans wer ed IRWD is s tudy i ng a di ffere nt ro u te fo r flow and may not wan t to put i t i n Vo n Karm an on l y . Dire c to r Neal said his Council i s presently opposed to a n y i nc reas e coming in t o the plant . Voice vote o n the motion . Motion carr i e d . Neal vot ed no . Re District 7 only -Item 13(c) -(e), it was mov e d a nd s ec on de d to ap prove t he s e items. Voice vote . Mo t ion carried un animou s l y . -4 - #14 -Re S~ringfellow It was moved and seconded to receive and file communications from Bettie Nosek , two letters from Huntington Beach , Barbara Brown and Founta i n Valley .~. Motion carried . The Chair recognized Andrew Schlange from SAWPA who addressed the Board . He repo r ted that in November an action was taken regarding the Strin gfellow project . Five areas of concern were identified and addressed in their official rep l y . He then passed out copies of their letter replying to these issues . He r eviewed the history of the formation of SAWPA . The purpose of SAWPA i s to protect--to desig n, finance , develop and con struc t facilities t o pr otect water quality for upstream sewers and the main water needs of the Orange Cou n ty service area. Said their goal is to provide al l of their consatuents with high quality drinking water supply . He further reported that in 1972 they joined into a con tract with Or ange Cou n ty to build the Santa An a River Interceptor. The purpose was to assist SAWPA in the remo val of highly saline wate r . Th a t faci lity has been' in operatio n for two years and has disposed of a p proximately l ~ billion gallons of wastewater . That water is required to meet OCSD ordinances go v er ni ng al l d ischarge i nto this a rea . Mr. Sc hl a nge said l ast month he was asked whether an EIR had been conducted that specifically identified Stringfel low a s a d ischarger in to this system. Didn 't know the answer at that meeti ng but in September 1982 an EIR was co nducted. The mitiga t io n measures were that we were obl i ga t ed to meet and satisfy the most stringent conditions of the OCSD ordinances . Th e Stringf e llow acid pi t s h ave been in oper ation fo r ma n y ye ars . That site closed in t he early 1970 's , the liqu i d on t he s ur facte was siphoned up and trans ported to a Cl ass I site , where it was n eutralized and a barrier wa ll was constructed . Subsequently , water began leaking from this site in the Glen n Avo n area . Three e ng inee ri ng firms conducted s tudies over a period of 3 -5 year s . Another stud y has been conducted by EPA 's Superfund which recommended fast-tract remed ial acti on. EP A also did a study of h ow t o t reat this water to make it environmentally safe to discha r ge into this system . In 1977 James Montgomery also conducted a study and thei r recommendations provide for t he same type of trea tmen t process as EPA 's engineer , CH2M Hill fiv e yea rs l ater . SAWP A is i n this t o help s olve t h e pro blem fo r t he ne xt three years and they hired Lowry & Associates to help study this . They conducte d a n extensive study and their recommendation was line percipitation a nd gran ul ate carbon abso rp tion (??). He added that SAWPA representatives appeared be fo r e the Exec ut ive Committee on s e vera l occas i o n s , which resulted in the November actions . Said they are more than happy to do the remedial ac tion s req ues t ed by the Bo a r d and have undertaken ste p #2 listed in their le t te r. Advised that o n Monday they r eceived no tifications that the Superfund wo uld fund the enviro nm en t al r e view t hat was requested and have advised o ur engineers to proceed with that study . Referred to lette r from Engineer dated Sep t ember 10 , 198 5 and letter fro m DOHS . Said they have advised their engi n~er to t r y to have that r eport i n draft form by the fir st or second week of Jan ua r y . Hav e also asked that the Sanitation District Board and staff assist them in acquiring the names and addresses of those who are int erested in receiving that d ocument so i t may be t r ansmitted as soon as t he draft is out . Wil l schedul e pub l ic meetings i n this area t o r ev iew concerns and take all comments . Will try to incorporate legitimate concerns into their plans . He added t h at there is a great d eal of u rgency . In 1982 they were talking about 45,000 ga l lons a day . Now have 187 ,000 gallons per day . Is moving abo u t 3~ feet per day . As r ecentl y as September water was i den tified north of the canyon . Now water is north of the freeway and has been detected south of the freeway . Sa id they are concerned and would like to have the Boards ' ass urance that they can move ahead . ·-s - Director Stanton said he didn 't think it had been po i nted ou t tha t this Board passed a conditional action last month asking for an EIR , n o t an env i ronmenta l review . The major difference of an EIR is that you have positive impact throughout the pr ocess and have alternatives to the proposed projec t t o be considered . Asked if this Board was willing to accept t h e language o f the environmen ta l review . Asked for a n EIR . Mr . Schlan ge stated that SAWPA , DOHS and EPA ente red into a contract May 1 , 1984 . The sec ond phase re design of the plant was August 1984 . Construct ion bids were as k e d fo r in September and were received October 15 and were subject to awa r d after t hey met with the Sanitation Districts ' Boards which Ll1ey Jiu in Noveml>e r . Chairman Edgar the n stated that he just looked at the November 14th minutes which we re just approved and they state a full environmental review . Direc to r Saltarelli added that his motion said environmental review . His intent was to allow the g reat deal of documents that have already been c omp le ted be included . Would expect that enviro nmen tal review would incor- porate work from the Orange County line on down . Schlange replied that he would look into that . Stanton said the motion was not close t o a full EIR . Said he met with DOHS and EPA just tw o weeks ago a nd asked where the basic impac t was addressed . They had an impressive stack of documents but there was not public hearing held . Got public inp ut in the Stringfellow regi on and one or two other papers here. There were no contacts made with your re specti ve city councils or the Bo~rd of Supervisors . No public input fro m Orange County ; was only in the County of Riverside. Mr . Schlange replied that the 1982 report was circulated in Orange County and received only one response from the City of Gard e n Grove . Sta n ton said that has nothing to do with this particular project . Stanton also stated t hat SAWPA is goi ng to be charging a little bit above the cost on this project to fi nance the tr unk . Schlange said no , that is not tru e . It is not our intent to use Stringfel low as a means of financin g that facility . Stanton r eiterated that Schlan ge said that none of the funds are g oing to be used to extend that lin e . Many of the f un d s within SAWPA are used ultimately for the betterment or improvemen t of our supply system . He added you wi ll be getting funds a bov e a nd beyond the cost of this project a nd some of those monies could be used for the extension of that line . Are loo king at $14 million . In November said th is was a three-year interim solution but it may be five years . The people Stanton had met with said that if lin e i s extended , this more than likely would be the permanent solution . Said they needed to know about those kind of things . Need public h earin gs on this . Thi nk it is very important that th ese type of thi ng s come t o mind. Sc hlange asked who in SAWPA generated that information? Stanton said it was a me mber of their Board , no t the staff . Chairman Edgar added that it is o ur intent to conduct publ ic forums so that the people are able to rea ct . Dir ector Hart stated there is stil l some con fusion as to what is going to happe n with the wastewater when it comes to Orange County . Edgar explained tha t we have authorized SAWPA to pu t c l ean water down the pipe tha t is in the Santa Ana River . Question asked , what is c l ean? Answered, if it complies to wh at was previously designed by EPA 's and our ordinances . Because it is clean when it goes thro u gh th e Fountain Valley or Huntington Beach plant , there will be no pollution or deterioration . It is going to be as clean o r clea n e r tha n the effl u e nt that we get from plating indus t ries . Won 't be able to tell the difference . -6- Director Hart asked if it will come through the treatment plant? Blake answered that the treatment would be in three stages . The limits we set on industries in Orange County would app l y to this discharge . He gave an example of the arsenic content in the discharge . If it was 43 parts per billion , after dillution in this plant it would be 43 parts per trillion . It will pass through the plant and there will be a removal of a very small a mount of material . Hart asked , is i t being treated . BPA replied , yes , h ere as well as up there . Edgar added that it will be treated at Stringfellow and then goes thro ugh our pipe . Everything that come through our plant is treated here . Will be the same as the water upstream . Blake said it will · not be bypassed around our plant . Ou r plant is primarily involved in removing organ ic materials . There is a mi no r r emoval of additional material . BPA added that it will pass through our facilities at Plant 1 or Plant 2 . We have six trunk lines coming into the plants an d we make a choice depending on the overall quality of the SARI line of which 1% of that flow would be from Stringfel low . Culve r asked when Stri ngfellow 1 s treatment plant will start oper ating and was told they anticipate a r o und January 15 , 1985 . Qu es t io n was asked re Distric t 's author ity to t ermi nate discharge . Does that mean immediately? Tom Woodruff replied that we can stop them immediately without notice o r pu bl ic hearings . Is a n immediate admi nistrative process which is a tempo r ary stopping of thei r permit . Staff would cause an immediate sto p of d ischarge . Has nothi ng t o do with the disch arge of 30 mgd . Sch l ange added that if staff says it is in vio l ation , it will be Jeferre<l to a Class I site i n Santa Baruara or Kettleman Hills or somewhere else . It was then moved and seconded to receive and fi l e the report from SAWPA . Motion car ried . Hart asked if the Board was going to review the draft report whe n it was prepared? Was told , yes they wo ul d . The Joint Chairma n the n recog nized Allen Katz , a resident of Fountain Valley . ~e.~d/;l~essed the Board and than~ed the County B~ardof Sup~rvisors ' Chairman ~d Su pv . Stanton a nd their staff fo r their courtesies and respective action . Referred to Harriett Wieder 's letter to the Director of DOHS i nsisting on an EIR . Said he believed that a full EIR shou ld be prepared and request this Board to request an injunction , as requested by Wieder and Stan ton . Bet t ie Nosek then addressed the Board . She thanked Mayor Bailey and Director Fi nley a nd the Huntington Beach council for supporting Roger Stanton . She said she was speaking on behalf of a number of citizens . Said they oppose t he project as it stands right now . Have to have an EIR , not just a review . Have 750 sig natures on a petition and hope to br i ng it to the January Board meeti ng . Thanked JWS & BPA for getting her letter received and filed . Said she was more concerned about how Fountain Valley , Newport Beach and Huntington Beach got involved in this project . Of even greater conce r n is the recent d ump closures . There currently are about 7500 protests of the Casmalia Dump an d as s he und ers t ood it , Cas ma l ia will no longer be receiving wastewater as of January, 1985 . By 1990 trucking of toxic waste will be banned a l together . Said none of the coastal citizens want to deliberately impede the progress or jeopardize the Orange County water supply . Said she felt t hat toxic waste management may be the Sanitation Districts most pressing pr oblem . She again urged delay of the Stringfellow project until an EIR i s prepared . -7- The Chair then recognized Mr . Duane Wenck . He stated he didn 't know anything about toxic waste but said he was very angry about the way this Board has treated the citizens of Orange County . This research seems to be very shakey . Action is obscene and could be irrepairable . Not letting the citizens of Orange County know when something as big as this is happening shows a total lack of concern . Had a Bo a rd meeting one month ago and will have a plant that will be built in 60 days . He said he had no problem with helping that area as long as it could be safely handled . More responsibility should be taken by this Board in looki n g a t the long-term effects of toxic waste i n Ora nge County and going into the ocean . Director Hanson then addressed Stanton . Said Sta n ton has been on this Board and has met with other Directors on this ma t ter and knows this project didn 't start one month ago . Stanton has been in every meeting . Said he would like to know why Roge r based his opinions on LA TIMES articles written by uneducated, non-engineers, that write those articles . Asked why he didn 't bring this up a long time ago . Why did he wait u ntil the last month? Stanton replied that the fir s t he had heard about this was in August a nd again in September. Not at Joint Meeting though . Said he had asked for more information and refused to vote and recommende d ac tion by Board. S a id his opinion was not based on LA TIMES articles. Said his position was to be sure there i s proper input as t hi s has as much or more impact as the airport has on this county. Referred to his letter . Said a profit is being made to fina nce these lines . In fact they are look ing at a 20 year proposal. Also , said they were told that this water was going to be dumped into the ocean . Have now learned that this water is pretty clean and if it i s used by Water Factory 21 , will be inj ected i nto the wa ter table. If it can be desalinized by Water Fac to ry 21 , why can't it be desalinized up there and pumped back into the water table there. EPA said they rejecte d that alterna tive. We didn't consider that alternative here though . With an EIR will be exposed to alternativ es. Edgar wanted it note d for the record that both he and Mr . Stanton at the February Executive Committee meeting heard the d etails of the Stringfe llow proposal which closely matches what we have heard now. Stanton replied that at that meeting the Assistant General Manager had ass ur ed the Directors that a formal proposal would have to be submit ted to the Board of Directors for approval, and the Districts' Ch ief Engineer had once denied SAWPA's request in a letter dated July 11, 1 983 . Ruth Bailey commented that the difference between what the majority voted on last time , as she saw it, was when that EIR should be done. Said as a dec i sion maker, she neve r makes a decision until an EIR is available. Asked why, in t his p art icular instance, were they reversing the order? Smith replied that he understood that they had capacity rights in the line and they meet the o rdina nces of the Districts so they mu st have s ome rights to the l ine . ?? said the motion was for an e n v i ronme n tal review but was also a request for an EIR . The e asiest way to solve the problem is to get a report and get the information out in the open and everybody will be happy . Why ar en 't we doing a report? Edgar explained that there is probably a l egal pos ition wher e SAWPA may not have had to a s k us to do what we are do i ng . They ar e entitled to capacity and have paid for it. We have ordinances fo r everybody t hat comes into t he Di stricts . Plati ng -8- compani es have to spend much money to comply . The i mportant thing is to process the request and we don 't want to hide things . There is a possibility that there are some hidden things that might need to be reviewed. We a r e going to have an environmental review but t o have the wh ole proces s delayed would be inappropriate . Cooper s t a t ed that right now they would be trucking 12 miles . Wondered if they were going to be checking every truck . Edgar said they would be checking the holding tank . It would be treated and have a complete ch emical a n alys i s there before being put in to the t rucks . Joh~ Setmire, a local homeowner, addressed the Board . Said he saw a very elaborate slide presentation on the odor mitigation problem and thought a study of this i ssue really l ack ed in comparison . Would l ike to see a more elaborate study with the same degree of en thusiasm as that o n odors . Edgar replied that he would have an opportunity to see al l those things. Director Saltarelli stated that it was the inte nt of his motion to do the most stringent possible thing tha t we could do to p rotec t ourselves and begin cleaning up an area that is desparately in need of help . We have to under stand that we need to do the most we can to prote ct t heir water supply and ultimately , the water suppl y of Orange County . Yes we need an e nvi ronm enta l report and study. Have been talking since July 1983. People probably thin k we are g oing pump brine water into Orange County. This is not the case . The c ase simply is they are going to take the water and run it through a full, complete treatment process and turn it into clean water--cleaner than most waste already received. Will transport to Orange County and will be treated again and goes out five miles into the ocea n with the rest of the waste . If a corporation was beginn ing a plant up there and was c reat i ng additional waste that met our standards, they wouldn 't have to ask for a permit and we wou ld accept . their waste without controversy. Wi ll be daily test ing. No water will come into the Sanitation Dis t ricts without being check e d. Thi s i s a very minor problem compared to other things that af fect peoples ' lives. Need t o clean up situation as soon as po ssi b le with the best controls po ssible . Should do a review with all the public input that we should have . We should keep it from moving further so should take this kind bf action . If some body wants to do something else , go ahead , t o see that it doesn 't get i nto my water supply. The f aster it ge ts out of the ground and gets tr eated , the better off t he people in Glenn Avon and we are going to be . Think we sho uld do something about this and do it very quickly. I agree with ever ybody a nd don 't want to be harmed by this but don 't think we should wait another year . Should procee d with the action we too k . Stanton then moved to (1) rescind action of November 1 4 , 1 984 , g 1v1ng conditional authorization to SAWPA to permit DOHS t o discharge pretr eated Stringfellow wastewa t ers into the Districts ' treatment system ; (2) direct staff t o immediately notify SAWPA, DOHS and EPA of the recission ; and (3) delay furthe r consideration o f the matter until DOHS completes and EIR on the proposed "i n t e rim" project and conducts pubi c hearings on the project in Orange County . Mo tio n seconded by Nea l . Saltarelli asked what the l ega l distinction was between and EIR and an environmental review. Tom Woodruff answered that the Environmental Quality Act provides specifications for an environmental impact review . Under federal action there is an environmental impact assessment. For an environmental impact report are required to have a . draft doc ume nt setting forth a proposal . Then requires certain publications and no tic es . Requests public comme nt and r equires l ead agency to prepare responses to all items of concern that are raised. Must show what has been done to mitigate adverse impacts or why no mitiga tio n is necessary or if there are no adve r se impacts. Final report must be prepared which must incorporate all responses and then must be adopted by the lead agency . An environmental revi ew i s not a statutory-cr ea ted term or procedure . There h ave been a variety of environmental impact assessments relative to thi s pro ject. Are other environmental criteria for our treatment such as adopti o n -9 - of an industrial waste ordinance which enforces max imum l e vels for 1 6 constituents. If wa stewater that is deposite d is l ess than the max i mum level of all 16 , there would be no adverse environmental i mpact . We did a very t horough EIR on our ordi nances befor e adoption . Environmen t a l wo r k done by OO HS and EPA fo r Stringf e llow project wo u ld be brought forth i n p r oject prese ntat ion and examinati o n . Whatever EPA ha s would be presented for public examination, review and comment . There would be no fixed calendar ing procedur e r equir eme nt s . Saltarelli added that by the procedures of the Industrial Waste Ordinance , meet its standards , t hey meet requirements of EIR done for t hat ordinance. that he would stand by those words "environmental r eview". if they Res tated S tan ton said in an EIR you look at alternatives. You look at adverse impacts , alt erna tives and wh a t can be mitigated . Al t er native s a r e looked at in that proc ess and in that process on l y . Questio n a sked re about how long it would take to complete t h is process. TLW replied that if the District did undertake an EIR as the lead agency, are looking at e ig h t mon t hs for an EIR a nd to f ast -track it , depending on what is disclosed, might be able to c u t it down a li t tle. Are cer t ain time frames between actions of 45 -60 d ays. With regard to an environmental review, we don't know yet how much has already been assembled . Hope to have a package pr ese nted by J anua ry 1 5th and maybe 30 days later will hav e public c omme nt . Then ano ther 30 days for r eview of comm ent heard . Maybe a total of 90 -120 days . Dick Ols on ask e d i f we have started this review? Schlange indicate d that they have star t ed and hope to have package ready by J anuary 15th . He added that he agreed with Saltarel li that we have got to stop it someplace . He said h e jus t returned to the Board and did not know all the backgr ound up to this date . He a dded that he supported Stanton 's reques t to have s o me type of doc ument . Wou l d ha ve to abstain on th i s matter until he ge ts more background informat ion. Hanson asked for a clarification from Stanton. I s it your intent on this motion t o postpone all work on this project until an EIR is f i nished? Stanto n r e f err ed to part t h r ee of his motion to delay further considera t ion of t he matter until the DOHS completes and EIR and conducts public hearings in Orange County . Chairman Edg a r comm e nted that a t the current rate of extracting toxic materi a l at S t r i ngfellow , it would probably t ake one century to clean it up . EPA is working on another plan and hope that in 3-5 years wi l l have a long-term solution . Dir ector Kawanami said if it takes 8-9 month s for an EIR , what will the impacts be? Was told that contaminated water would continue t o flow 3~ feet p e r day. Time is of t he essence . Ma u rer asked if t he wate r is so clean , why can't they put it in the ground in their area? Advised him that the salt in the water is the wors t enemy . It is our problem also . If you pu t it i n a line of this kind , do not put it in the underground watershed that comes down to our taps . Bailey asked, isn't it their responsibil i ty that it doesn 't intrude more than it has? Not our respon sibility. Answered that they could triple the cost, but it would solve the p roblem . If we delay it , t here will be more that can get into the groundwater. Stanton added that if you said okay tonight , still wouldn't be able t o put it into t he line because the plant isn't built yet . Don 't think construction has started . -1 0- If we don 't do s ometh i n g within the next month o r two , will be i n Orange County . Stanton stated r e sa linity of the wate r, one of the sugg est i ons that he asked EPA representative about was if this water is so great and you can put it in t o the groundwater, why don 't you build a desalinization plant and put it back into the ground there? They said that was a viable alternative but they had rejected it . EPA representatives said they did consider it. EIR pro cess gives us those alternatives . Said nobody is arguing with the engineers. The fact is that t he process of determining alternatives has not been followed . If this goes f o r fi ve years and line is extended, then that is the long-term solution . Is not an inter i m solution a ny more. CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. Reread the motion. follows: DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3 and 7 voted NO. ROLL CALL VOTE . MOTION FAILED , as DISTRICTS 5 , 6 and 11 voted YES . Question was asked re SAWPA meeting to be held on Decem ber 20th?? They said no action is scheduled on this matter . They will be meeting with OCWD on Tuesday , December 18th at 9:30 but this item is not o n the agenda. #22 -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 OTHER BUSINESS The General Manager briefly reported on Districts 5 & 6 Master Plan. Initial phase of the program was to take one ba rrel from Plant 2 and rehabilitate it. Have had two breaks in the last three yea rs. Reported that yesterday one o f the barrels between Bitter Po int Pump Statio n and Plant No . 2 failed. The good news i s that no sewage was lost. De ferr e d the flow to the second barrel. Calle d on Tom Daw e s to report further . TMD referred to map . Explained probl em of failure and cave-ins . Have put u p f ences. Said we ar e putting toge ther a p lan to complete the re pair s. Must recommend emergency repair of 11 feet of 24 " line . If Board s approve, will solicit bids on an emergency basis and will br ing bids back to Board for awa rd . Have aske d the Purchasing Dept . to locate the pipe and they have done so . Can get it within a few days. Existi ng line is steel cylinders . Are _recommending ductile iro n pipe which we find to stand these conditions ver y well . Feel we can g e t thi s done in a very timely manner . Asked for approval to solicit bids. Maurer ask ed if they could get back ve ry far to test the line . Tom said it has been determined to not be good in many locations where they have opened up the line . Said it would be approximately 1 00 feet for $100 ,000 ± JWS added that staff r ecommend s that the Boards of Districts 5 and 6 consider adjourn ing to a conveni ent time next week to receive a more c omplete report from the statff and consider the eme rgency bids that will have been received . It was moved and seconded t o approve staff 's reques t . Also moved to adjourn to Tuesday, Dec embe r 18th at 4:00 p.m. at the Newport Beach City Council Conference Room. Motion carried. Question asked r e funding. JWS said t h e staff would pr epa re a report for t he future work required. -11 - December 12, 1984 Joint Meeting Notes #4 -Recognition of Per so ns Th e Join t Chairman recognized Allen Katz, Bettie Nosek , Al Satler and Duane Wenck who stated they wi shed to ad dre ss the Board with regard t o Agenda Item No . 14 . #5(b) -Election of Chairmen pro tern DISTRICT 5 -Philip Maurer elected Chairman pro tern DISTR IC T 6 -Ruthelyn Plummer elected Chairman pro tern DISTRICT 7 -David Sills elected Chairman pro tern DISTRICT 11 -Roger Stanton elected Ch airma n pro tern #7(a) -Report of the Joint Chairman (1) Joint Chairman Edgar announced that Director Philip Maurer, Newpor t Bea ch Mayor and Director on Di st ricts 5 and 7 , was recentl y r eappointed to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board , Santa Ana Region 8 , by Governor Deukmejian . (2) Mr . Edgar also reported that he had received a le tter from Fountain Valley Mayor , Ben Nielsen , reque s t i ng a joint study sessi~between the Council and a com mittee of Directors . The Council has r eq uested the meeting to disc uss proposed Pl ant No . 1 expansion in Fountain Valley , proposed formation of new District No . 14, the Stringfellow proposa l, a nd odor control measures to be undertaken by the Districts . The Joint Chairman stated that he had asked the Select Advisory Committee of Directors to participate i n this joint study that will be held sometime after t he first of the yea r . (3) Joint Chairman Edgar r e port ed that the Exe c utiv e Committee reviewed Director Cooper 's request that the Board establish a smoking policy fo r the Board Room. He noted that the Committee directed th e staff to designate the two tables in the rear center of the Board Room , immediately be neat h the ve n tilatio n ex haust , as a smoking area, a nd the ba l a nc e of the Board Room has been designated as non-smoking . Sig ns hav e been placed on all the t a bles indicati ng this . (4) Chairman Edgar then reported that the Executive Commit tee would not meet in Dec em ber due to the holid ay season . There are no othe r scheduled Committee meetings . However , the Joint Se lection Committee and the Dist r ict No . 7 Selection Committee may meet at the call of the Chairman. (5) The Chair then recognized Mr . Steve Nelson from Southern California Edison Company who presented an award t o the Districts for their energy conservation program . Mr . Nelson indicated that he is the Area Manager for SCE i n Fountain Valley . He stated that these awards are given to customers who r eceive significant results in management of electrical resources . The Sa nitati on Di stricts have achieved significant savings . Mr . Edgar said the Di stricts appreciated the award and pledged to continue their conservat ion program . (6) Mr . Edga r added that the Board of Supervisors approved the formation o f District No . 13 that day . Would be effective about J anuary 1 , 1985 . The General Manager reported that lasL week lie hao oeen in Washington , o .c . along with other members of the AMSA Board of Directors to meet ·.·.'ith William Ruckelshaus (sp?), EPA Administrator , who has resigned effective early in Ja nu ary . He said Lee Thomas who presently leads up the Superfund activities was not able to meet with us but we did get a commitment to pass on some of our A good deal of the meeting centered around funding activities with the current concern in Washington on the deficit in the national budget . They weren't very optimistic . It was their opinion that there wasn 't going to be many programs that will be approved . Are going to have to give u p some fund i ng if EPA 's Operation Budget is going to be cut . Mr . Sylvester added that another item they discussed were the audit problems with EPA . The main problem is after the auditors go through 5-10 years after the project is complete , they over t urn the decisions that the program staff had approved years befor e . They are reversing their decisions . They were sympathetic to that and hopefully we will make some progress there . The General Manager also met with several people with regard to the Districts 1 30l(h) waiver . Also talked t o Frank Covington and as a result , a meetin g has been set up in San Francisco that Friday . A member of our staff will be t here as well as representatives from EPA to see if the 30l(h) waiver can 't be worked out . Mr . Sylvester advised that the staff would like to request that Consent Calendar item #9(c) be deleted from the agenda . Need to have some further discussions with the contractor . Re Agenda Item #15 , we are asking the Board to declaFe its intent to amend the Joint Ownership , Operation and Construction Agreement to include newly formed County Sanitation District No . 13 effective January 1 , 1985 . That Amendment would come back to the Board for approval at the January 9th Board Meeting . This is a result of the action today of the Board of Super- visors re District No . 13. #7(c) -No report of the General Counsel #12(a)(l) -Verbal report of Malcolm-Pirnie The Chair recognized Dick Brownell , Jeff Lauria ~ Frank Dryden of Malcolm- Pirnie, consultants re odor mitigation at Plants 1 and 2 . They reported that they laid out a set of objectives identifying significant odor sources . They reveiwed existing data and collected additional data to recommend immediate actions and concurrently evaluate many different alternatives to come up with a long-term odor control plan to reduce the amount of odor comp l aints . Jeff Lauria gave a slide presentation with regard to Plant 1 odor problems. He said at Plant 1 there has been 69 complaints over 34 months . At Plant 2 have been 245 complaints over 34 months . Cooper asked how many studies they had completed to date and Mr . Lauria answered about 6 . Also asked what the initial cost of the Florida facility was? Answered about $12 million for the entire plant 5 years ago . -2- Director Neal asked when the primary treatment at Plant 2 was built and when were the homes built? He was advised the the plan t was built in the 1950's and the homes were built subsequent to that . No EIR prepared as CEQA was not in effect at that time . Mr. Edgar advised that the Executive Committee reviewed their study and came up with five points . We have to go with the best technology we know . Recommend we cover all primary clarif iers and study every place where digester gas is leaking . Items (a)(2)(a) thru (e) were then moved and seconded . Edgar added that it would mean $10 million of expansion but believe there is existing money available that could do the job. Stanton thanked the Distric ts ' staff for conducting this odor study . Said Directors Brown and Nea l pressed very hard for this study . Director Neal said the City of Fountain Valley is tremendously pleased by the action of the Joint Board. Voice vote on motion . Motion carried . #12(b) -Re Redevelopment Agencies Chairman Edgar reported that we recognize a pass-thr ough is acceptable but most agencies are reluctant to do that . The bulk of redevelopment agencies involve industrial or commercial uses that ordinarily pay the Sa nita t ion Districts for effluent . I t is only residential areas where there is a problem. The Executive Committee recommends adopting this policy . Director Cooper stated that there were 11 cities that did not respond to the Districts ' request for input with regard to Redevelopmen t Agency projects and his Counci l had directed him to recommend to the Board that they have a complete evaluation presented by the staff at the City Managers ' meeting so they can report back to their respective Councils . Chairman Edgar stated that it has already been six months since he had wri t ten and had received responses from more than half of the agencies . Said they are recommending a policy with several ways for each agency to respond . Director Partin added that this request was sent out in election time and he hadn 't even seen it . Said he would be in favor of postponing this a little while . Edgar stated this his l etter was sent out long before any election . Director Holmberg stated that recommendation #3 leaves negotiation with city managers open to other alternatives . The Seal Beach representative said they went over the r ecomme nd ed policy and it is quite comprehensive . No . 3 opens this for discussion with the gro up s and will be part of the cooperation with the City Managers . Don Smith said his City has been waiting a long time for a policy on this and would like to have some action . Called for the question. It was moved and seconded to approve the Executive Committee recommendations . Point of information asked for --Could this become a complicated legal situation with each city? Tom Woodru ff said he didn 't believe so . Said the process of trying to strike an agreement with many other agencies has been existing all along . The agency could choose or no t choose . The agency has less discretion now . Don 't see any par ticular unique legal problems at all . Voice vote on the motion . Mo tion carried . Cooper voted no . -3- #12(e)(l) -The General Manager reported that at the r a te that s om e o f t he chains are deteriorating, if we wait one month , it migh t not be in t he be st interest of the Districts . He added that the staff i s as ki ng fo r a u t hority to award a contract for this chain with the concurrence of t he Joint Cha irman and General Counsel, providing that bids that come in do n ot exceed $1 ,445,000 . It was then moved and seconded to approve items 12(c) thru (f). Motion carried . #13 -Re Di strict No . 14 Chairman Edgar reported that they have reached some points of consensus . Re item 1 3(b)(2) the flow calculation should be synchronized wi th the Dis t rict 14 formation . The only ft5"rmal action needed now is the creation of a suspense fund . Re #13(d)-Tom Dawes reported that the staff and General Counsel conducted negotiations with Steve Bubalo Construction Co . to see i f they could agree to a change order to reduce the size of pipe in Von Karman Avenue between Main and Michelso n . The change order was requested by IRWD . He advised that they were unable to reach a mutually-satisfactory change order . Staff recommends Schedule A, as awarded by Directors . It was then moved and seconded to approve items 13(b)(l) -(5). Question asked why IRWD wanted to reduce the pipe size? Answered IRWD is stud yin g a different route for flow and may not want to put it in Von Karman o nly . Director Neal said his Council is presently opposed to any increase coming into the plant . Voice vote on the motion . Motion carried . Neal voted no . Re District 7 only -Item 13(c) -(e), it was moved and seconded to approve these items . Voice vote. Motion carried unanim o u sly . -4- #14 -Re Stringfellow It was moved and seconded to receive and file communications from Bettie Nosek , two letters from Huntington Beach , Barbara Brown and Fountain Valley ._.t>c. Motion carried . The Chair recognized Andrew Schlange from SAWPA who addressed the Board . He r eported that in Nove mber an act i o n was taken regarding the Stringfellow project . Five areas of concern were identified and addres s ed in the ir official reply . He then passed out copies of their letter replying to these issues . He reviewed the history of the-fOrmaflon of -SA\~A . The purpose or-sAWPA is to protect--to design, fin a nce, develop and construct facilities to protect water quality for upstream sewers a nd the main water needs of the ~ge County service area . Said their goal is to provide all of their constituents with high quality drinking water supply . He further reported that in 1972 they joined into a contract with Orange County to build the Santa Ana "River Interceptor . The purpose was to assist SAWPA in the r emoval £._f highly saline water . That facility has been i'"'i1°"operation for two years and has disposed of approximately it billion gallons of wa stewater . That water is r equired to meet OCSD ordinances governing all di scha rge into this area . Mr. Sch lange said last month he wa s asked whether an EIR had been co nducted that specifically identified Stringfellow as a discharger into this system . Didn 't know the answer at that meeting but in September 1982 an EIR was co ndu cted. The mitiga tion measures were that we were obligated to meet a nd satisfy the most stringent conditions of the OCSD ordinances . The Stringfellow acid pits have been in operation for many years . That site closed in the early 1970 's , the liquid on the surfacte was siphoned up and transported to a Class I site , where it was neutra lized and a barrier wall was co n structed . Sub sequently , water began leaking from this site in the Glen n Avon area . Three engineering firms conducted studies over a period of 3-5 years . Another study has been co nduct ecr-sy-E"P A's Superfund which recommended fast-trac-t remedial action . EPA also did a sfudi of how to treat this water to make it environmentally safe to discharge into this system . In 1977 James Montgomery also conducted a study and th ei r recommendations provide for the same type of treatment process as EPA 's e ngineer , CH2M Hill five years l ater . SAWPA is i n this to help sol ve the problem for the next three years a nd they hired Lowry & Associates to help stud y this . They conducted an extensive stud y and their recommendation was l .i"Yle_percipitatioQ and granulate carbon absorption (??). He added that SA \.JPA representatives appeared before the Executive Committee on several occasions , which resulted in the November actions . Said they are more than happy to do the remedial actions reque sted by the Board a nd -have un dertaken step #2 l isted in their l etter . Advised that on Monday they received notifica tions that the Superf und ~o u l d fund tfie e nvironmental review that wa s req uested and have advised · our -engineers to proce e d with that study . Referred to letter from Engineer dated September 10 , 1985 and letter from DOH S . Said they have advised their engineer to try to have that report in draft form by the_fjrs t_or _~econq week of Janu a~ Hav e also asked that the Sa nitation District Board and staff assist them in acquiring the name s and addresses of those who are interested in receivin g that docum e n t so it may be transmitted as soon as the dra ft is out . Will sch ed ul e public meetings i n this area to review co ncerns and take all com ments . Will t ry to incorpor ate l egitimate co ncerns into their_ plans . He ad ded that the r e is a g reat deal of urgency . In 1982 they were talking about 4),0-00 gallons a day . Now have 187 ,000 gallons per day . Is moving about 3t feet per day . As recently as September water was identified north of the canyon . Now water is north of the freeway and has been detected sout h of the f r eeway . Said they are conce rn ed and would like to have the Boards ' assurance that th ey ca n move ahead . ----- -5- Director Stan t on said he didn't think it had been pointed out that this Board passed a condition al action last month asking for an EIR , not an environmental rev iew . The major diffe r ence of an EIR is t hat you have positive impact throu ghout t he -process and have alternatives to the proposed project to be consiaerecI-:-Asked if th is Board was willing to accept the language of the env:lrOnment al review. Asked for a n EIR . --- Mr . Schlange stated that SAWPA, DOH S and EPA entered i n to a contract May 1 , 1984 . The second phase r e design of the plant was August 1 984 . Construction bids were asked for in September and were received October 15 and were subject to award after they met with the Sanitation Districts ' Boards which Lliey <liJ .i.n November . Chairman Edgar then stated that he just looked at the November 14th minutes which were justapprov ed and they state a full environmental review . Director Saltarelli added that his motion said environmental revi e w. His --intent was to a~1ow the great deal of documents th at have already been completectbe included . Wou l d expect that environme nta l revi ew would i n.cor - porate wo'"?k l:rom the Orange County line on down . Schlange replied that he would look into that. Stanton said the motion was not close to a full EI R. Sa id he met with DOHS and EPA just two weeks ago and asked where the bas ic impact was add res sed . They had an impressive stack of documents but there was not public hear ing held . Got public input in the Stringfellow region and one or -two other pap ers 'i1ere . There were no contacts made with your respec tive city coun cils o r tfle"l3oard of Supervisors . No public input from Orange County ; was only in the County of Riverside . Mr . Schlange replied tha t the 1982 report was circulated in Orange County and received only one response f r om the City of Garden Grove . Stanton said that has nothing to do with this particular pr oject . Stanton also stat ed that SAWPA is going to be char ging a little bit above the cost on this project to finance the trunk. _ _.Sch lang e_§_ai~,_lki a !.J.~ not true . 'Ttls not our intent to use Stringfellow as a means of financing that facility . Stanton--reiterated that Schlange said that n one of t he fund's are going to oe used-to extend that line .. Many of the funds within SAWPA are-Llsed ultimatel y for the betterment or improvement of our supply system . Heacla eo you will be getting funds abo;;ea~d beyond the cost of this p_ro,jec.t and some o t those monies could be used for the exten sion of_that line . Are looking at $14 million . In November said thiS was a three-yea r i nter im solution bu t it may be five'"Jears . The people Sta nto n had met with s aid t hat if line is extended , this more tfiai1J:ikely would b e the permanent sOIUtio~ Saidthey needed to k~ow about -those kind of things . Need pub l ic rtearings on this . Think it is very important that these type of things come to mind . Schlange asked who in SAWPA generated tha t information? Stant on said it was a member of their Board , not the staff . Chairman Edgar added that it is our intent to conduct public forums so that the people are able to react . Director Hart stated there is still some con f usion as to what is going to happen with the wastewater whe n it comes to Orange County . Edg ar explai ned thaFwe have authorized SAWPA to put clean water down t he pipe that is i n ~Santa Ana R:iv~r . Question asked , what is clean? Ans wered , if it c o mp ~ies to what was prev io us ly desi g ned by EPA 's and our o rdinances . Because it is clean when ft goes throu g h the Fountain Valley or Huntington Beach plant , there wi~l be no pollution or deterioration . It is going to be as clean orTieaner tflanthe effluent that we get from plating industries . Won I t be~~b-i-e-tc)le ll thi°"difference. --- -6 - Director Hart asked if it will come through the tr eatment plant? Blake a~ered that the treatment would be in three stages . The limits we set on industries in Orange County would apply to this discharge . He gave an example of the arsenic content in the discharge . If it was 43 parts per billion, after dillution in this plant it would be 43 parts per trillion . It will pass through the plant and there will be a removal of a very small amount of material . Hart asked , is it being treated . BPA replied , yes , here as~ ~s up_ there . Edgar addea mat iTwITl -pe tt.eateo atStringtellow and then goes through our pipe . Everything that ~ome through our plant is treated here . Wilrbe fhesame as the water upstream . Blake safd it\ii}T not be bypassed around our plant . -Our plant is primarily involved in removing organic materials . There is a minor removal of additional material . BPA added that itwD1. pass th.r..ough o ur facilities at Plant 1 or Plant 2 . We have six trunk lines coming into the plants and we make a choice depending on the overall quality of the SARI line of which 1% of that flow would be from Stringfellow . Culver asked when Stringfellow 's treatment plant wi ll start operating and was told they a n ticipate around January 15 , 1985 . Question was asked re District 's authority to terminate discharge . Does that mean immediately? Tom Woodruff r eplied that we can stog_ them immediately without notice or public hearings . Is a-;-immediate administrati;;e process - wnich is a temporary stopping of their permit . Staff would cause an immediate stop of discharge . Has nothing to do with the discharge of 30 mgd . Schlange added that if staff says it is in violation, it wi]] be <leCerre<l to a Class I slte ln Santa Barbara or KetLleman Hills or somewhere else . It was then moved and seconded to receive and file .. Motion carried . Hart asked if the '"Board was goi.£8 ------Wl'i e n it was prepared? !Nas told , yes they wou l d . ---- the report from SAWPA . to review thedraft report ------ The Joint Chairman then recognized AlJ.en Katz , a resident of F..Q_untain Valley . He addresseclthe Board and thanked the County Boardof Supervisors ' Chai r man IA;IU..b..,._ ~ and Supv . Stanton and their staff for their courtesies and respective action. Referr ed to Harriett Wieder 's letter to the Director of DOHS insisting o n an EIR . Said he believed that a f ull EI R should be prepared and request this Board to r equest an injunction , as requested by Wieder and Stanton . ~ett ie Nosek then add r essed the Board . She thanked Mayo r Bailey and Director Finley and the Huntington Beach council for supporting Roger Stanton . She said she was speaking on behalf of a number of citizens . Said they oppose the project as it stands right now . Have to have an EIR , not just a re view . Ha ve 750 signatures on a petition and hope to bring it t o the J anuary Board meeting. Thanked JWS & BPA for getting her letter received and filed . Said she was more concerned about how Fountain Valley , Newport Bea ch and Huntington Beach got involved in this project . Of even greater concern is the recent dump closures. There currently are about 7500 protests of the Cas malia Dump and as she underst ood it , Casmalia will no longer be receiving wastewater as of January , 1985 . By 1990 trucking of toxic waste will be banned altogether . Said none of the coastal citizens want to deliberately impede the progress or jeopardize the Orange County wate r supply . Said she fel t that toxic waste management may be the Sanitation Districts most pressing problem . She again urged delay of the Stringfellow ~oj~ct until an EIR is prepared . -7 - The Chair then recognized Mr . Duane Wenck~ He stated he didn't know anything about toxic waste but said he was very angry about the way this Board has tre~ted . the citizens of Ora nge County . This research seems to be very shakey . Action is obscene and could be irrepairable . Not letting the citizens of Orange County know when something as big as this is happening shows a total lack of concern . Had a Board meeting one month ago and will have a plant that will be bui~t in 60 days . He said he had no problem with helping that area as lon ~ as it c~uld be.safe ly handl e d . More resp onsibility should be taken by this Board in l ooking at the long-term effects of toxic waste in Orange County and going ln.£9 the oc~an . ., Directo r Han so n then addressed Stanton . Said Stanton has been on this Board and has met with othe r Directors on this matter and knows this project didn 't start one month ago . Stanton has been i n eve ry mee ting . Said he would like to know why Roger based h is opi n io ns o n LA TIMES articles written by u n educated , non-engineers , that wri t e those articles . Asked why he didn 't bring this up a long time ago . Why did h e wait u ntil the last month? Stanton replied that the fir s t he had heard about this was in Augu s t and again in September . Not at Joint Meeting though . Said he had asked for more information and r efused to vote and recommended act i on by Board . Said his opinion was not based on LA TIMES articles . Said his position was t ~ be sure the ~ i§__P_E2 pe ~ inpu t _as thi_s has as much or more impac t as the airport has on this county . Referred to his letter. Sai a a-profi~s being made to fin ~e _thes ~ l_ines . In fact they are looki_!29 at a 20 year proposal. Als o, said they were told that this water was going to be aumped int o the ocean.~ve now learned that this water i s pretty clean and if it i s usea-5y Wa ter Factor y 21 , will be in jected i nto the water table. If i t can be desaIInized by water Fact'O ry 2 1,~ ..£fill'._t _j.J;_ be desaliniz ed up the r e and pumped back i nto the water table there . EPA said they rejected that alte rnative . We didn 't _ - COi15Ider-that alternative here though . With an EIR wil--Y--be exposed to alterna ti ve s. Edgar wanted it noted for the record that both he a nd Mr . Stanton at the Febr uary ~xecuhv eComrn it ~ m~ti.!!9 hea rd tne ~t ail s of th ~ Stringfe llow proposa l which· closely matches what we have heard now . Stanton r e pli ed that a t that mee ting th e Assistant Ge ne ral Mana ge r had assured the Directors that a formal proposal would h ave to be submitte d to the Board of Director s for approval , and the Districts ' Chie~ Engineer had oncedenied-SAWPA'S r~est in a l et ter_ d ated July 11, 1983 . _, Ruth Bailex commented that the difference between what the majority voted on last time , as she saw it , wa s when th a t EIR should be done . Said as a d ec i s i o n maker, she n ever makes a d ec i s ion until a n EIR i s avai l able. Asked wh y , i n-thi-;-particular insEance , were they reversing th e orde r? Smith repl ied that he understood that they had capacity rights in the line and they meet the o 'rdinances of the-Dis t ricts so they must ha ve some rights to the line . 63t.:~?} "7 said the motion was for an environmental review but was also a request for a n EI R . The ea s iest way to solve the proble m i s to g et a report and get the i nformation out in the open and everybody will be happy. Why aren 't we doing a report? Edgar e xplained t hat there i s probably a l e gal position whe re SAWPA may not have had to ask us to do what we are doing. They are entitled to capacity and have paid for i t. We n a ve ordinan ces for everybody that com es into th e Distr icts . Plating -8- companies have to spend much money to compl¥· The i mportant thing is to p rocess the request and we don 't want to hide things. There is a possibility that t h e r e are some hidden things that might need to be reviewed. We are go ing to h ave an e nv iro nmental re view but to have the whole proces s delayed would be inappropria t e . Cooper stated t hat right now they would be trucking 12 miles. Wonde r ed if they were going to be c heck ing every truck . Edg ar sa id they wo uld be checking t he ho l ding tank . It would be treated and have a complete chemical analysis there before being put into t he tr uc k_s . -------- John Setmire, a local homeowner, addressed the ~~d..:.. Said he saw a very elaborate s lide presentatio n on the o dor mitigation problem and thought a study of this i ssue reaflyJ:acJ<ea in comparison ~ Would like to see a more e l aborate stu dy with the same · degree of--eri°thusiasm-as th ~t o n Qd ors ~ Edgar replied t hat he would have an opportunity to see-all those things. Director Saltarelli stated that it was the intent of his motion to do the most stringent possible thing that we could do to protect ou rs e lve s and begin cleaning up an area that is desparately i n n eed of-help. We have t o understand that we need t o ~e most we can to p rotect the ir water supply and ultimately, the water supply of Orange County . Yes we n eed an e nvir o nm e n tal report and study . Have been talking since Juf Y-1983. People probably th i nk we are going pump br i ne water into Orange CO't.inl::y . Tnis is not t h e .case . The case simply is they are going to take the water a__na run 1 t through a full, complet,g_treatment Brocess and turn it into clean water--cleaner t han most waste already r e ceived. Will transport to Orange County and will be treated again and goes out five miles into the ocean with the r est of the waste. If 2.._Corporation was beg i nn1ng -a plant up there and was creating addition al waste that met our standards , they wouldn't have to ask f or a permit and we would a ccept their w ~-W ithout controve'°?sy. Wil l be da{ly testing . No water will come ~the Sanitation Di stricts without being checked. Th is i s a very minor problem c~pared to other t !1T;gs that affect peoples ' live s . Need t o clean up situation-as soon as possible with the best controls possible. Should do a review with all the public input that we s hould have .. We s ho uld keep it from moving further so should take this kind of action. I f somebody wants to do something else, go ahead, to see ~fr-aoesn 't g e t into my water supply . The faste r it gets o ut of t he ground and gets treatea.-,-the bet t er off the people in Glenn Avon and we are going to be . ThinK we-5nould do somethingi3.bout this and do it v ery quickly . I agree with everybody and CIO'n1 t want to be harmed by this b ut don't think we should wait another year . Should p~o ceea-wrt:n th~-ac~ion we t ook . Stanton then moved to Jll rescind act i on of Nov embe r 14, 1984, giving conditional authorization to SAWPA to permit OOHS to discha rge p r etrea t ed Stringfellow wastewaters into the Districts ' treatment system; (2) direct staff to i mmediately n o t ify SAWPA, DOHS and EP A of the recission; and (3) delay further cons ideration of me ma t ter until OOHS completes and EIR on the proposed "interim" projec t and conducts pubic heari ngs on t he project in Orange County . Motion seconded by Neal. Saltarelli asked wh a t the legal distinction was betwee n and EIR and an environmen t a l review . Tom Woodruff answered that the Environmental Quality Act provides specifications for an e :r;ir o~ental impa ct revi ew . Under federa l action there is an environmental impact ~~essme~t . For an env}ronme ntal i mpact repor t are required to h ave a draft docume nt setting forth a proposal. The n require s certain publications a:i1cfl1o ti ce s. Reques ts public commen t and require s lead agency to prepare responses to all items of concern t ha r-are raised . Must show what has been-done €0 mf tigate adverse impacts or why no mi tigation is necessary or if there are no adverse impacts . F {nal report must be prepar e d which must incorporate al l responses and t h en must be a dopted by the l ead agency . An environmental r evi e w is not a statutory-cr e ated term O.,E procedure:-There have bee~ a varie_ty of envir o nm e nta l impact assessments r e lative t o tfiis project. Are othe r environment al criteria for o ur treatmen t s uch as adopt ion -9 - o~ an indu str ial waste ordinance which enforces maximum levels for 16 constituents. Ir-'Wastewater t ha t is deposited i s less -t han the maximum level of all 16, there would be no adverse environmental impact. We d id" a very thorough EIR on our ordinances ~ before adopti on . Environmental work done by DOHS and EPA f or Stringfe l l o w pro ject wOU'rd be brought forth in project presentation and e xamination. Whatever EPA has wo~~ be_presented f~publ~c examination , review and comment . There would be no fixed calendaring procedure req~rements . Sa l tarelli added that by the procedures of the Industrial Waste Ordinance, meet its standards, they me et requirements of EIR d o ne for that ordinance . that he would stand by those words "environmental review ". if. they Resta t ed Stanton said in an EIR you l ook at alternative s . You l ook at ad verse impact s , a'rternatives and what can be m~~gated . Alternatives are l ooked at in that process and in that proces scmIY . Question asked re_E bpJJ..t bow long i t would ta ke to complete this process. TLW replied tfiat if the District did undertake an EIR_as the lead agency, are l ooking at eight months for an EIR and to f ast -track it, depe nding on what is disclosed, might be able to cut it down a l ittle . Are cer t ain time frames between actions of 45 -60 days. With regard to an environm_gntal review, we don 't know yet noW!mi.Ch has ari"e a dy bee n ~ ----assembled . Hope to ~ a _pack age prese nted by J C!P uary 15th an~ maybe 30 d ays later . ~ill have public comment . Then anothe r 30 days for review of comm ent heard. Maybe a tot al of 90 -120 days . Dick Olson as ke d i f we have started this review? Schlang e indicated that they h ave s t arted and hope to have packa ge ready by January i St'h. He added that he agreed wrth Saltarelli that we have got t o stop it someplace . He sa i d he just returned to the Board and did not know all the background up to this date . He added that he supported Stanton's request to have some type of document. Would ~ave to a!S'Stain on this matte r-Until he gets more background-information . -Hanson asked for a clarification from Stanton . Is it your intent on this motion to postpone all work on thi s project until an EI R is finished? St anto n referred to part thr ee of his mot ion to delay fur ther consideration of the matter un t i l the D"b HS completes-and EIR -and conducts public hearings in Orange County . . Chairman Edgar commented that a t the current rate of extracting toxic material at Stringfellow , it would probably take one century t o clean it u p. EPA is working on another p l an and ho pe that in 3-5 years will have a long-term solution . Director Kawanami said if it takes 8-9 months for an EIR, what will the impa c ts be? Was told t hat contaminated water would continue to flow 3~ feet p er day . Time is of the es s ence:-- Maurer asked if the wat~~ is so clean , why can't they put it in the ground in their area? Aavised him that the salt in the water is the worst enemy . It is our problem also . It you put ft in a line of this kind, do not put it in t he undergrpund wa tershed tha t come s down to our taps . Bailey asked , isn't it their responsibility that it doesn 't intrude more than it has? Not our res ponsibility . Answered that they c o uld triple the c ost , but it would solve the proble m. If we dela y it , there wi ll be more tha t can get into the groundwater . Stanton added that if you said ok ay t onight , still wouldn 't be able t o put it into tl1e'"""Ii ne be cause the plant i s n't bu ilt ye t . Don't think construction ha s sta rted . -1 0- • If we do n't do s ome th i ng with in the n ex t month or two , will be i n Orange County . --------Stanton stated re sa linity of the wa t er , one of the sugge st i ons that he asked EPA r 'e'pr esentati ve abou t was if this wa ter is so gr eat a nd yo u can put it into the groundwa t er, why don't you buil_§ a d esali n ization plan t a nd put it bac k in t o the ground t here?-Th ey sa id that wa s a v i a ble al t ernati ve bu t the y had re jected i t . EPA representat~ves sa id they did conside r it . EIR process g ive s u s t hose a lter nat i ves . Said nobody is arguing with the enginee rs . ffiel:act iS-tha t tne pro c e ss o f determining al t ernati ve s has not been foliowed . ~t h is goes -for f i ve year s a nd line is extendecr,-then that is the long-ter m solution. Is no t a n i n t er i m sol u tio n a n y more. CALLED FOR THE QUESTION . Reread the motion . follows: _ DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3 and 7 voted NO . ROLL CALL \XJ TE . MOT I ON FA ILED, as DISTRICTS 5, 6 and 11 vo ted YES. Question was asked re SAWPA meeting to be held on Decemb e r 2 0 t h ?? The y s a i d no action is scheduled on this matter. They will be meeting wit h OCWD o n Tu e sday , December 18th at 9:30 but this item i s not on the agenda . #22 -DISTRICTS 5 & 6 OTHER BUSINESS The General Manager briefly reported on Districts 5 & 6 Master Plan . Initial phase of the program wa s to take one barrel from Plant 2 and rehabi lita t e i t . Have ha d two breaks in the last t h ree years. Reported that yesterda y o ne o f t he bar re l s between Bitter Point Pump Station and Plant No . 2 failed. Th e good n ews i s t ha t no sewage was lost . De ferred the flow to the seco nd barr e l. Ca l led o n To m Da wes t o report further . TMD referred to map. Expl a ined pr obl e m of failure and c ave -ins . Hav e p u t up f enc es . Said we are putting toge ther a plan t o complete the repair s . Mus t re commend emergency repair of 11 feet of 24" line. If Boards approve, will so licit bid s on an emergency basis and will bring bids back to Bo a rd for awar d . Hav e a s ked the Purchasing Dept. to locate the pipe and they have done s o . Ca n ge t it wit h in a few days. Existing line is ste el cylinders. Are recommendi ng d uct i le i ron p ipe wh i ch we find to stand these conditions very well .. Feel we can g e t t h is done i n a v ery time ly manner. Asked for approva l to solicit bids . Maurer asked if they could get back v e ry far to test th e line . Tom said it has been determined to not be good in many locations where they have o pened up t he l in e . Said it would be approximate ly 100 f e et for $100,000 ± JWS added that staff recommends that the Boards of Districts 5 and 6 consider adjourning to a convenient time next wee k to receive a more c om p le t e report f rom the statff and consider the eme rgency bids that will have been rece i ved . It was moved and seconde d to approve staff's request. Also moved to adj o urn to Tuesday, December 18th at 4:00 p .m. at the Newp o rt Beach City Co u nci l Conferenc e Room . Motion carrie d. Question asked re f unding. JWS said the staff would pre pare a repor t for t he f u tur e work required. -11- - coum SANITATION DlmlCTS NOS. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AID 11 OF ORANGE coum, CALIFORNIA . llNms OF THE REGUUR MEETING 011 DECErSER 12, 1984 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFI~ 10844 EJ.I.IS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on December 12, 1984, at :30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and '-invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7 and 11 as follows: DISTRICT NO. 1: DISTRICT NO. 2: DISTRICT NO. 3: DISTRICT NO. 5: DISTRICT NO. 6: DISTRICT NO. 7: '-fe'lSTRICT NO. 11: ACTIVE DIRECTORS x Robert Hanson, Chairman -X--Dan Griset, Chairman pro tem -X--oon Saltarelli x Rog~r Stanton x Henry Wedaa, Chairman -a-oon Roth, Chairman pro tem ----Richard Buck -X--suck Catlin -X--sam Cooper -X--Dan Griset -X--Jobn Holmberg -X--carol Kawanami -X--James Neal -Bob Perry -X--DOn Smith x Roger Stanton a oon Roth, Chairman ----carrey Nelson -X--auth Bailey -X--oscar Brownell -X--suck Catlin _,!__Norman Culver -X--oon Griffin· X-Dan Griset x John Holmberg John Kanel -X--James Neal X-Richard Olson x Sal Sapien x Roger s tan ton x Charles Sylvia x Evelyn Bart, Chairman x Philip Maurer, Chairman pro tem ..JL_Roger Stan ton x James Wahner, Chairman x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem _!__Roger s tan ton x Don Smith, Chairman x David Sills, Chairman pro tem ..JL..Richard Bdgar ..JL..Dan Griset ..JL..Pbilip Maurer ...!_Roger s tanton ...!_James Wahner _x_Ruth Bailey, Chairman _!_Roger Stanton _John Thomas -2- ALTERNATE DIRECTORS __ orma Crank __ Robert Luxembourger Ursula Kennedy Harriett Wieder · Todd Murphy E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. x Arthur Newton -Chris Norby ----Carrey Nelson ----Robert Luxembourger ----Bill Mahoney ----William Odlum ----Marvin P. Adler x Norman Culver Gene Beyer Harriett Wieder ____ a. Llewellyn Overholt _!._Sam Cooper ____ John Thomas Joyce Risner Chris Norby Bob Perry x Norma Seidel ____ James T. Jarrell _Robert Luxembourger _Bill Mahoney x Richard Partin ----Marvin P. Adler -Bruce Finlayson -Jean Siriani Harriett Wieder __ David Lander Bill Agee --Bill Agee Heather Harriett Wieder ____ Steven Smith ____ John Cox, Jr. ____ Harriett Wieder ____ Gene Beyer _Sally Anne Miller __ Ursula Kennedy _Robert Luxembourger _Bill Agee _Harriett Wieder _Harry Green __ Robert P. Mandie, Jr. _Harriett Wieder _!_Ruth Finley · 12/12/84 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Blake Anderson, Bill Butler, Gary Streed, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Richard von Langen, Chuck Winsor, Bob Ooten Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Suzanne Atkins, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf, J. Andrew Schlange, Allen R. Katz, James E. Nosek, Bettie L. Nosek, Nancy Penkwitz, Bob Penkwitz, Steve Nelson, Yvonne Dohl, John Setmire, Kathleen Powers, Andre Riou, J.D. Wenck, Thomas Woddel, Debra Khan, Neil Cline, Kathy Ferguson, Wesley N. Taylor, Elaine Salamacha, Howard Hicks, Peer Swan, Art Bruington, Frank Dryden, Dave Harris, Jeff Lauria, Richard Brownell * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICTS 3, S, 6, 7 & 11 Receive and file minute excerpts re Board Appointments Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the minute excerpts from the following cities re election of mayor, appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows (*Mayor): City District(s) Active Director Alternate Director Cypress 3 Huntington Beach 3 11 11 Newport Beach 5 5 6 7 Stanton 3 DISTRICT 5 Election of Chairman pro tem Ruthelyn Plwmnber would no election of a new· chairman John Kane!* Richard Partin Ruth Bailey* John Thomas Ruth Bailey* Robert P. Mandie, Jr. John Thomas Ruth Finley Philip Maurer* Bill Agee Evelyn Hart Bill Agee Ruthelyn Plummer John Cox, Jr. Philip Maurer* Bill Agee Sal Sapien Jean Siriani* The Joint Chairman advised the District 5 Directors that due to a change in Board representation, Chairman pro tern longer be an active Director on District No. 5 and that pro tem for the District would, therefore, be in order. Director Philip Maurer was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of District No. s. DISTRICT 6 Election of Chairman pro tem The Joint Chairman advised the District 6 Directors that due to a change in Board representation, Chairman pro tern -3- ·- 12/12/84 Evelyn Hart would no longer be an active Director on District No. 6 and that election of a new Chairman pro tem for the District would, therefore, be in order. Director Ruthelyn Plummer was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of ~ District No. 6. DISTRICT 7 The Joint Chairman advised the District Election of Chairman pro tem 7 Directors that due to a change in Board representation, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart would no longer be an active Director on District No. 7 and that election of a new Chairman pro tem for the District would, therefore, be in order. Director David Sills was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of District No. 7. DISTRICT 11 Election of Chairman pro tem The Joint Chairman advised the District 11 Directors that due to a change in Board representation, Chairman pro tem Ron Pattinson would no longer be a Director and that election of a new Chairman pro tern for the District would, therefore, be in order. Director Roger Stanton was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tern of District No. 11. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. I..,_,/ DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, t11e Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 12/12/84 DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 14, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman Joint Chairman Edgar announced that Director Philip Maurer, Newport Beach Mayor and District Director, was recently reappointed by the Governor to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region VIII. Mr. Edgar reported that in response to a letter he received from Fountain Valley Mayor Ben Nielsen, requesting a joint study session between the Fountain Valley City Council and a committee of Sanitation Districts' Directors to discuss proposed Plant No. l.expansion in Fountain Valley, proposed formation of District No. 14, the Stringfellow proposal and odor control measures to be undertaken by the Districts, he had asked the Select Committee to Advise the Staff to participate in this joint study session that will be held sometime after the first of the year. The Joint Chairman reported that the Executive Committee had reviewed Director Sam Cooper's request for establishment of a smoking policy for the Board Room and had directed the staff to designate the two tables in the rear center of the room immediately beneath the ventilation exhaust as a smoking area and the balance of the room as non-smoking. Chairman Edgar announced that the Executive Committee would not meet in December due to the Christmas holiday. Mr. Edgar then reported that the Board of Supervisors, at their meeting earlier that day, had approved the formation of County Sanitation District No. 13 effective January 1, 1985. Presentation of award by Edison Company for energy savings by the Districts The Joint Chairman recognized Mr. Steve Nelson, Fountain Valley Area Manager for the Southern California Edison Company. Mr. Nelson presented an award to the Districts for the significant savings achieved as a result of the Districts' energy conservation program. Chairman Edgar expressed the Districts' appreciation for the award and pledged to continue the conservation program. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager The General Manager reported on a meeting he attended the previous week in Washington, D.C. along with the other members of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies'(AMSA) Board of Directors with William Ruckelshaus, the Environmental Protection Agency's Administrator, and members of his staff. Mr. Sylvester also reported that while in Washington he had met with EPA staff members regarding the Districts' pending 30l(h) Waiver/NPDES Permit. As a result, a meeting with EPA, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Districts' representatives was scheduled for Friday, December 14, in San Francisco to work out the final details of the Waiver/Permit. -s- .. .... 12/12/84 The General Manager then requested that the consent calendar agenda item be deleted relative to accepting Job No. PW-118, pH and Conductivity Meters for "C" Headworks Influent Trunks, as complete, to allow staff to hold further discussions with the contractor regarding the close-out of the job. Mr. Sylvester commented on the action of the Board of Supervisors earlier that day approving formation of new District No. 13. As a result of that action he recomemended that the supplemental agenda item requesting that the Boards declare their intent to amend the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement to include newly-formed County Sanitation District No. 13 effective January 1, 1985, be adopted by the Joint Boards. A formal amendment would then be presented to the Joint Boards and the Board of District No. 13 for consideration at the January 9th Board Meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, .seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "An and "Bn, attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - Joint Working Capital Fund Self-Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications re Job No. P2-25-2 11/14/84 $352,137.57 147,892.57 62,004.43 1,737.64 22,894.02 108,128.53 639.30 9,414.71 5,262.04 181.26 10,005.52 $720,297.59 11/28/84 $ 222,928.27 749,616.24 107,030.43 143.26 1,557.20 3,670.59 31, 228 .67 6,577.20 8,784.40 6,579.12 269,239.33 3,675.13 14.35 $1,411,044.19 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, authorizing an addition of $3,546.00 to the contract with Advance Constructors, Inc. for application of concrete adhesive on two engine pads, pouring of concrete curbs and application of epoxy sealant curbs cllid engine pads and for alternations to the new stainless steel condensate lines, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications re Job No. P2-26 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Primary Sedimentation Basins P and Q at Plant No. 2, Job -6- 12/12/84 No. P2-26, authorizing an addition of $4,610.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for installation of a new surface drain line and drain box, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRIC?S Approving Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 17904 to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. re Specification No. M-019 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 17904 to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. for Emergency Replacement of an 8-inch Sludge Withdrawal Line on Sedimentation Basin "D" at Plant No. 2 (Specification No. M-019), increasing the total amount from $11,700.00 to $16,192.51 for additional grouting required to fill a large void under the basin. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Jobs Nos. Pl-21, P2-28-l and P2-28-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-199, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Engineering Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-21; Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28-l; and Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling Facilities, Job No. P2-28-2, providing for an extension of time for completion of the design work for Job No. Pl-21 from December 14, 1984 to February 14, 1985, at no increase in the total compensation. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase contract for Supplying Chlorine in One-Ton Cylinders, Specification No. C-016, to Jones Chemical, Inc. contract for Supplying Chlorine and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-200, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase in One-ton Cylinders, Specification No. C-016; FURTHER M:>VED: That said purchase be awarded to Jones Chemical, Inc. at the price of $169.00 per ton. ALL DISTRICTS ApProving Familian Pipe & Supply as the successor-in-interest to Kelly Pipe & Industrial Supply re Specification No. P-065 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Familian Pipe & Supply be, and is hereby, approved as the successor-in-interest to Kelly Pipe & Industrial Supply for purchase of Pipe, Valves and Fittings, Group II, September, 1984. Specification No. P-065, awarded by the Boards in ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers re Job No. P2-29 of Primary Basins D & E at Plant No. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for design of Rehabilitation 2, Job No. P2-29. -7- 12/12/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement with That the Selection Conunitte be, and is Kennedy/Jenks Engineers re hereby, authorized to negotiate an \..,! Job No. P2-30 agreement with Kennedy/Jenks Engineers for design of Rehabilitation of Domes and Installation of Sludge Pump Mixing Systems for Digesters E and H at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-30. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 5 to the agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Job No. P2-25-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum No. 5 to the agreement with John Carollo Engineers re design of Hydraul~c Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, to provide for preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Manual. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on November 28, 1984, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Dick Verbal report of consultant, Brownell, Jeff Lauria, Dave Harris and Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., re Odor Frank Dryden, representatives of Situation Assessment and Malcolm Plrnie, Inc., the firm engaged Recommended Plan by the Boards to conduct an odor control study at Plants 1 and 2. The ""'-' consultants reviewed the procedures they followed to assess the odor situation and recommend immediate mitigation actions and a long-term odor control plan. A slide presentation was given on alternative odor mitigation measures that could ·be taken at Plants 1 and 2. The Joint Chairman stated the consultant had recommended full covers for the clarif iers at Plant No. 2 and partial covers at Plant No. 1 but that the Executive Committee was recommending a modification to install full covers at Plant No. 1 also. He then briefly reviewed the Committee's five recommended actions relative to adoption of an odor mitigation policy and implementation of the consultant's recommendations, as modified, at an estimated cost of $12.7 million. Director James Neal, representative from the City of Fountain Valley, indicated that the City was very pleased with the odor study and recommended actions. Supervisor Stanton also expressed his appreciation to ·the staff and Directors for the study and recommended actions. Approving Malcolm Pirnie Odor Situation Assessment and Recommended Plans for Plants Nos. 1 and 2 and directing the · Plant No. 1 recommendations be modified -8- Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Malcolm Pirnie Odor Situation Assessment and Recommended Plans for Plants Nos. 1 and 2 be, and are hereby, approved; and, 12/12/84 FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to direct Malcolm Pirnie to modify the Plant No. 1 recommendations to include full covers for the Plant No. 1 primary sedimentation basins similar to Plant No. 2~ and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards hereby declare their intent to implement said recommendations, as modified, with respect to retrofitting of existing treatment works with odor control facilities. Declaring Poliey to include odor mitigation measures in future Moved, seconded and duly carried: treatment works construction That the Boards of Directors do hereby declare and adopt a policy to include odor mitigation measures in future treatment works construction. Directing staff to prepare a Moved, seconded and duly carried: , detailed implementation plan and schedule to accomplish long-term That staff be, and is hereby, directed odor mitigation recommendations to prepare a detailed implementation plan and schedule including scopes of work for necessary engineering services to accomplish the adopted long-term odor mitigation recommendations. Authorizing staff to direct K.P. Lindstrom, Inc. to include the Malcolm Pirnie recommendations in the EIR for the Master Plan of Joint Works Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to direct K.P. Lindstrom, Inc., consultant engaged to prepare the EIR for the Master Plan of Joint works, to include the Malcolm Pirnie recommendations re odor mitigation at Plants 1 and 2, as modified by the Directors, in the EIR. Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with Malcolm Pirnie Moved, seconded and duly carried: re existing foul air scrubbers That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate with Malcolm Pirnie for services to optimize efficiency of existing foul air scrubbers and to prepare standard operating practices. ALL DISTRICTS Adopting poligy of negotiating with Redevelopment Agencies for funding of Districts' services for redevelopment project areas The Joint Chairman reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee had been studying alternatives for funding of Districts' services for redevelopment project areas for some time and·that they are recommending adoption of redevelopment agencies. a three-point guideline for future negotiations with Director Sam Cooper, representing the City of Brea, expressed concern that not every agency had responded to the Districts' request for input re proposed alternatives to be included in this policy, and he suggested that these recommendations be presented at the next City Managers' Meeting for further comment before the Boards consider adoption of the policy. During the discussion that followed it was pointed out that the proposed third \...; policy alternative is sufficiently broad enough to allow other alternatives if an agreement cannot be reached using the suggested guidelines. -9- 12/12/84 It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors do hereby adopt the policy of negotiating with Redevelopment Agencies for funding of Districts' services for redevelopment ·-._.; project areas~ and, .• FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to enter into negotiations with each agency using the following priority ranking of the alternatives as a guideline in the negotiations, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee: (1) Pass through of incremental tax revenues for all project areas (2) Issuance of industrial waste permits to all commercial and industrial users within each project area, and levy of a user fee on residences within each project area (3) Direct negotiations to discuss costs and select an appropriate alternative on a project-by-project basis Director Cooper requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be recorded. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to exercise the option in the agreement with Parkson/Wyss to negotiate a purchase of Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers (Specification No. E-144-1) ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to solicit bids for the purchase of Blower SUrge Protection Instrumentation (Specification No. E-144-2) consideration by the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to solicit bids for Installation of Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers and Appurtenant Eqµipment (Specification No. M-020) Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to proceed with Phase 3 of a Physical/Chemical Advanced Primary Treatment Process Study process using ferric chloride exceed $269,000. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to exercise the option in the agreement with Parkson/Wyss to negotiate a purchase of Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers (Specification No. E-144-1) for consideration by the Boards. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit bids for the purchase of Blower Surge Protection Instrumentation (Specification No. E-144-2) for Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit bids for Installation of Flex-A-Tube Medium Bubble Diffusers and Appurtenant Equipment (Specification No. M-020) for consideration by the Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to proceed with Phase 3 of a Physical/Chemical Study for a full-scale evaluation of the physical/chemical and polymer at Plant No. 2, for a total cost not to -10- 12/12/84 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to purchase up to three different anionic polymers for evaluation in Phase 3 Physical/ Chemical Study (Specification No. P-071) amount not to exceed $30,000. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to purchase up to three different anionic polymers for evaluation in Phase 3 Physical/Chemical Treatment Process study (Specification No. P-071) for an ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that staff Authorizing award of a contract to had advised him that with the rate of Gerlich-Mitchell, Inc. for Purchase deterioration of the chain system on the of the Proprietary Budd Chain rectangular sedimentation basins at System (Specification No. E-160) Plant No. 2 that is being experienced, it may not be in the best interests of the Districts to wait one month to award a contract for purchase of the proprietary Budd chain systems for retrofitting the Plant No. 2 clarif iers. He ~ recommended that the Boards consider authorizing the staff to award said purchase for an amount not to exceed $1,445,000.00, with the concurrence of the Joint Chairman and General Counsel. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate and award a contract to Gerlich-Mitchell, Inc. for Purchase of the Proprietary Budd Chain System (Specification No. E-160) for an amount not to exceed $1,445,000.00, with the concurrence of the Joint Chairman and General Counsel, to retrofit the remaining 11 secondary clarifiers and three primary clarif iers at Plant No. 2. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to prepare plans and specs and solicit bids for Removal of the Existing Deteriorated Chain and Installation of the Replacement Budd Chain System (Specification No. M-021) consideration by the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Approving continuation of services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to prepare plans and specif !cations and solicit bids for Removal of the Existing Deteriorated Chain and Installation of the Replacement Budd Chain System (Specification No. M-021) for Moved, seconded and duly carried: of White, Fine and Verville That the Boards of Directors do hereby approve the continuation of services of White, Fine and Verville to provide assistance re legislation for the research project for deep ocean disposal of sludge from January, 1985 through June, 1985;. and, FURTHER H:>VED: That an increase in the total maximum compensation be, and is hereby, authorized from $100,000 to an amount not to exceed $145,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Actions relating to proposed formation of District No. 14 Receive and file Interim Report of the Select Committee to Advise Staff dated December 12, 1984 -11- Joint Chairman Edgar ref erred Directors to an Interim Report of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff relative to the proposed formation of 12/12/84 District No. 14 which had been included in the meeting folders. Following a brief report by the Chairman and staff, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Interim Report of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff dated December 12, 1984, re Proposed Formation of District No. 14, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. .Further Amending the Joint Boards' action of August 8, 1984, as Moved, seconded and duly carried: amended on November 14, 1984, declaring intent to approve an amendment to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement That the Joint Boards' action of August 8, 1984, as amended on November 14, 1984, declaring intent to approve an amendment to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, changing the basis of calculating the the joint ownership percentage from flow and assessed valuation to flow only, contingent upon execution of an agreement by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) by December 12, 1984 providing for the proposed formation of county Sanitation District No. 14, is hereby further amended to extend the time for execution of the agreement by IRWD to allow for completion of an appraisal of the Districts' treatment plant land, and to further provide that any such change would be concurrent with the effective date of formation of the new District. Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement with a consulting firm to prepare the formal engineer's report required re formation of District No. 14 proceedings relative to the proposed further consideration by the Boards, IRWD. Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement with a consulting firm to prepare an Environmental Impact Report re formation of District No. 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement with a consulting firm to prepare the formal engineer's report required for public formation of District No. 14, for the cos't of said report to be paid by Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement with a consulting firm to prepare an Environmental Impact Report required for public proceedings relative to the proposed formation of District No. 14, for further consideration by the Boards, the cost of said report to be paid by IRWD. Establishing District No. 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Suspense Fund That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-207, establishing District No. 14 Suspense Fund for payment of expenditures incurred on behalf of proposed District No. 14 in connection with the proposed formation thereof. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Director Neal stated that the Fountain Valley City Council is opposed to any additional flows at Plant No. 1 and requested that his vote in opposition to the items relative to proposed District No. 14 be made a matter of record. -12- 12/12/84 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file letter from Irvine Ranch water District agreeing to That the letter from Irvine Ranch Water pay their share of construction of District, dated November 19, 1984, Contract No. 7-8 agreeing to pay the sum of $867,696.00 to the District for their incremental share of construction of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Schedule "A", Contract No. 7-8, awarded to Steve Bubalo Construction Company by the Board on November 14, 1~84, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement with a consulting firm to revise the District No. 7 Master Plan of Trunk Sewers Environmental Impact Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement with a consulting firm to revise the District No. 7 Master Plan of Trunk Sewers Environmental Impact Report to address the proposed capacity increase and extension of the Main Street Relief Subtrunk Sewer from Von Karman to the Peters Canyon Wash to provide alternative service connection for proposed District No. 14 for further consideration by the Boards, as recommended by the Committee, the cost of said report to be paid by IRWD. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file letter submitted by Bettie Nosek re Stringfellow waste Disposal Site Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter submitted by Bettie Nosek received November 21, 1984, relative to the request of Santa ..Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) to pretreat and dispose of groundwater from the Stringfellow waste Disposal Site, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Resolution No. 5465 adopted by the City of Huntington Beach on November 19, 1984 re Stringfellow waste Disposal Site Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Resolution No. 5465 adopted by the City of Huntington Beach on November 19, 1984, relative to the Districts accepting the pretreated groundwater from the Stringfellow waste Disposal Site and requesting prior completion of an Environmental Impact Report by the California Department of Health Services on SAWPA's proposal, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file other communica- tions re Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter dated December 5, 1984 from Ruth s. Bailey, Mayor, City of Huntington Beach, the letter dated November 27, 1984 from Charles A. Allen of Seal Beach and the letter dated November 2, 1984 from Barbara Brown, Councilmember, City of Fountain Valley, requesting that an Environmental Impact Report be completed relative to the proposal to dispose of pretreated groundwaters from the Stringfellow site, and the letter dated December 10, 1984 from the City of Fountain Valley transmitting excerpts of City Council actions relative to th~ proposed disposal of pretreated groundwaters from the Stringfellow Site to the Districts' sewerage system, be received and ordered filed. -13- . ' .. 12/12/84 ALL DISTRICTS Repart from Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority re compliance with conditions established by the Boards re acceptance of pretreated groundwaters from Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site The Joint Chairman recognized Andrew Schlange, General Manager of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) who addressed the Boards of Directors regarding the proposal to dispose of pretreated groundwaters from the Stringfellow site to the Districts' sewerage system. Mr. Schlange briefly reviewed the history of the formation of SAWPA and its mission to protect the quality of the upper and lower Santa Ana River underground water basins. The joint contract between SAWPA and the Districts, executed in 1972 toward that end, resulted in the construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor and the purchase of capacity in the interceptor and the Districts' joint treatment and disposal facilities by SAWPA. He also reviewed briefly the proposal of SAWPA and the State Department of Health Services (OOHS) to extract contaminated groundwaters from Stringfellow's site, pretreat them to Federal, State and Districts' standards and then dispose of them through the Districts' sewerage system, and the engineering studies completed to date on the Stringfellow site and the proposed interim solution. Mr. Schlange passed out copies of a communication dated December 4, 1984, from SAWPA to the Districts acknowledging the conditions established on November 14th by the Boards of Directors for acceptance of the pretreated groundwaters from Stringfellow. Mr. Schlange stated that it was the intent of SAWPA and DOHS to comply with the Boards' five stipulations. He then read a letter dated December 10, 1984, from the State Department of Health Services which was attached to the SAWPA communication, concurring.with the stipulations and committing to an environmental review that would focus on the potential and probable·impacts that the pretreated Stringfellow effluent would have on SAWPA's facilities and their environs, the Districts' facilities and their environs, and to receiving waters upon final discharge. Mr. Schlange stated that he had been notified that the Superfund would pay for the environmental review that was requested and that they are proceeding with preparation of said environmental review which would be drafted in early January, 1985. He also noted that public meetings would be scheduled in Orange County to provide the opportunity for public commentary on the program. Following a request for a clarification as to whether the action of the Boards of Directors on November 14th stipulated that a full environmental review be conducted or that an Environmental Impact Report be completed, it was pointed out that the November 14th minutes stipulated that " ••• a full environmental review to commence inunediately" be conducted. (The proposed Stringfellow interim remedial plan is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act requirements for an Environmental Impact Report by special legislation.) In response to a question it was also clarified that the groundwaters to be extracted from Stringfellow would be treated at the new treatment plant to be · built at the Stringfellow site and, once it is transported through the Santa Ana River Interceptor system to the Joint Districts' sewerage facilities, it would receive further treatment at the Districts' treatment facilities along with all other incoming wastewaters. It was also pointed out that the Districts have the right and authority to irmnediately terminate acceptance of the pretreated Stringfellow waste in the event that it did not comply with the Districts' stringent standards. The extracted groundwater, in that event, would then be hauled ~o a Class I disposal site in Santa Barbara or Kern Counties. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: -14- 12/12/84 That the communication dated December 4, 1984, from the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority to the Districts', agreeing to the stipulations imposed by the Boards of Directors on November 14, 1984 for disposal of pretreated Stringfellow groundwaters to the Districts' sewerage system, be received and ordered filed. \wl The Joint Chairman then recognized Allen Katz of Fountain Valley, Bettie Nosek of Huntington Beach, and Duane Wenck of El Toro who addressed the Boards in opposition to the proposal to accept pretreated Stringfellow groundwaters, and requested that the project be delayed until an environmental impact report was completed. Supervisor Stanton then referred Directors to a letter dated December 12th that he had distributed to Board Members requesting that the Directors reconsider their November 14th action, and swnma~izing new information on the proposal that had come to his attention. He expressed his concern regarding the charges by SAWPA to DOHS for treating and disposing of the wastewater and the potential use ~ of funds derived from said charges to extend sewer lines1 and the fact that a portion of the Districts' treated effluent is provided to the Orange County water District for desalinization at their Water Factory 21 and reinjection into the groundwater table. He reiterated his request that an Environmental Impact Report be conducted with formal public hearings in Orange County to further address the various alternatives to the proposal, noting that desalinization at the Stringfellow site had been considered by OOHS and rejected, for reasons undisclosed to him. The chair then recognized John Setmire of Fountain Valley who also addressed the Board· and suggested a more elaborate study and presentation on the proposal. Director Saltarelli then stated that it was the intent of his original motion at the November meeting to allow the Stringfellow clean-up project to immediately proceed in order to correct a serious problem and to protect the underground fresh water supply of Glen Avon and Orange County, yet provide testing and the best controls possible to assure that the wastewater meets the Districts' standards. He pointed out that the water will be treated at the site in accordance with strict requirements and then transported to the Districts' system where it will be treated again prior to disposal. He further pointed out that the requirements are the same as those imposed on any other industrial discharger that requests a permit for use of the Districts' system. There will be daily testing and no water will be discharged to the Districts' system without being checked for compliance. He agreed that an environmental review should be conducted as stipulated by the Boards, with public input, but that correction of the problem should be commenced immediately to assure that the situation did not worsen. It was then moved by Supervisor Stanton,.and seconded, that the Boards of Directors rescind the action of November 14, 1984, giving conditional authorization to SAWPA to permit OOHS to discharge pretreated Stringfellow wastewaters into the Districts' treatment system1 to direct staff to inunediately notify SAWPA, OOHS and the EPA of the recision1 and to delay further consideration of the matter until DOHS completes an EIR on the proposed "interim" project and conducts public hearings on the proposed "interim" project in Orange County. Pursuant to a request, the General Counsel then clarified the dif~erence between an Envirorµnental Impact Report and an environmental review, and the difference in the time frames to conduct an Environmental Impact Report, which are statuatory, and an environmental review, for which there are no statuatory provisions. -15- 12/12/84 Following further discussion there was a call for the question. The motion was restated and the vote was polled by roll call. The Secretary reported that the motion had failed, Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 7 voting against said motion and Districts Nos. 5, 6 and 11 voting in favor of said motion. ALL DISTRICl'S Declaring intent to amend the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construc- tion Agreement to include newly formed County Sanitation District No. 13 January 1, 198S. DISTRICT l Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors do hereby declare their intent to amend the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement to include newly formed County Sanitation District No. 13 effective Moved, seconded and duiy carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:12 p.m., December 12, 1984. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 42 - Ramsamooj Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-202-2, ordering annexation of .SOS acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Pleasant Place and Wildan Road in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 42 - Ramsamooj Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2~ A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: '-.,I Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:12 p.m., December 12, 1984. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:12 p.m., December 12, 1984. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 92 - Guzman Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-204-7, ordering annexation of 1.24 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Glen Albyn Lane and Rancho Santiago Boulevard in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 92 -Guzman Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -16- 12/12/84 DISTRICT 7 Receive and file reguest for annexation from ors. Kesho and Kamla Hurria and authorizing initiation of proceedings re proposed Annexation No. 121 - Hurria Annexation and ordered f iled1 and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request from Drs. Kesho and Kamla Hurria for annexation of 1.07 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Acre Place in unincorporated County territory, be, and is hereby, received FURTHER K>VED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-205-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation No. 121 -Hurria Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached beret~ and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an Addendum to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation re Contract No. 7-2C-4 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to neqotiate an Addendum to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Main Street Relief Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2C-4, for additional services to provide for Irvine Ranch Water District capacity in said project, cost of additional design work to be reimbursed to District by IRWD. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an Addendum to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation re Contract No. 7-7 Moved, seconded and 'duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an Addendum to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of South Irvine Lift Station and Relief Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-7, for additional services to provide for Irvine Ranch Water District capacity in said project, cost of additional design work to be reimbursed to District by IRWD. DISTRICT 7 Approving Addendum No. 3 to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation re Contract No. 7-8 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee in connection with Addendum No. 3 to the Engineering Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, providing for surveying services during construction of said project, be, and is hereby, received and ordered f iled1 and, FURTHER M)VED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-206-7, approving Addendum No. 3 to the Engineering Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, providing for surveying services during construction of said project, on a per diem basis, including prof it and overhead, for an amount not to exceed $41,064.00, increasing the total compensation from $194,230.00 to $235,294.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -17- '• j, ::-i . t 12/12/84 DISTRICT 7 Receive and file Summons and Cross Complaint for Indemnification and Declaratory Relief relative to Case No. 16 23 53, Continental Property Management Company, et al. vs. Orange County Sanitation District, et al. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Summons and Cross Complaint for Indemnification and Declaratory Relief relative to Case No. 16 23 53, Continental Property Management Company, et al. vs. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., in connection with two previous claims for alleged damages due to a sewer backup at the Versailles on the Lake apartment complex located at 3600 South Plaza Drive, Santa Ana, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed1 and, FURTHER l«:>VED: That said Summons and Cross Complaint be referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action • DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:12 p.m., December 12, 1984. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:12 p.m., December 12, 1984. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Contract No. 5-21-lRl Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Slide Gate Installation, "A" and "B" Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-21-lRl, authorizing a time extension of 37 calendar days to the contract with John T. Malloy and John T. Malloy, Inc., a Joint Venture, due to a delay in the delivery time required for the five slide gates, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 5-21-lRl as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-203, accepting Slide Gate Installation, "A" and "B" Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-21-lRl, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Authorizing staff to solicit bids for Emergency Replacement of Portions of "B" Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-19-Rl been directed to the second barrel of The Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer reported on a failure which occurred on December 8th in a section of the Coast Highway sewer system between Treatment Plant No. 2 and Bitter Point Pump Station. There was no spillage and the flows have the Coast Trunk System. This sewer was -18- 12/12/84 scheduled for replacement in 1985-86 but now requires iitDnediate action to repair approximately 2,100 feet of sewer easterly of Treatment Plant No. 2. Staff requested authorization to solicit bids for this emergency repair work for consideration by the Boards at an adjourned meeting to be scheduled the following week. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit bids on an emergency basis for Emergency Replacement of Portions of "Bn Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-19-Rl, from the Santa Ana River junction structure to a point approximately 2,100 feet easterly, for further consideration by the Boards at an adjourned meeting. DISTRIC? 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 4:00 p.m., December 18, 1984 at Newport Beach City Hall. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:22 p.m., December 12, 1984. DISTRICT 6 Mo~ed, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment .That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 4:00 p.m., December 18, 1984 at Newport Beach City Hall. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:22 p.m., December 12, 1984. C;)•*CI~~ Secretary, BJarFs of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 -19- ~ ! '' I !i: !:·I :.,, Ll I'' 1~·'.·; !. ! I '::_~. -' •. J-.a i. ::: , .. 1·: , .. ! 1:.:1 I •I ; ! i,.,. :1' .; ( ( FU~t ~o G]l~ -JT ~)SJ WCF~T~~ cir1Ttl .... F~O~tSSJ~G DATE 11/~P/R4 PAGE ~[PORT NUH~ER AP43 ( COltNTY 5.Af\'IHTION OISH:ICTS OF Ot;ANGE COUNTY i·I ~ ! CL4l~S P.AID 11'14/84 WtR~t~T ~o. VlNnOR !•7H!:l !!71652 '17Jf.53 t;7 H51f ,, 71 f :-:; ~·1 J 6':~ ~7 lf::57 ".?HC\~ ~1H;~ r• 7 t ~ f, ~· '7Hf1 ;, 7 l ,. 62 r?JH:!. ~7HE4 'J1 J ,;.f,f. ''71 ( (,f ~7jf.67 ". 71 Ha fi7J f.6q !i7l~7J n ir., 7l in H7;> •'7 l f: 73 r7!f74 ::1H75 r.'7!67~ J7Jf77 '171h7A 1'7 lf 7C! .. 71 (·8 ! "7 ! ~P.1 ,,7Hfi2 "71 t£l ~ "7 t (f-4 7 ~ "J.C:, ' 111: tr:. ~ 7 ~ ,.. P. 7 '71 f:Pn • 7} f-f'O ~ 7 l ,_ '?!~ '.· 71'-'?1 ·17 J f.C~• ·"'7!!:93 ·'7 l '-0 4 7 ! (: 95 7 ! i ~( /llP CALJFCPNH ~IP FOLLUTION CONTROL ASSN. AIF PRODUCTS ~ rHl~ICALSt !NCe ALL·STAT[ Yf~JCLf~, INC. AMf~ICA~ 5Cl~NTIFIC P~ODUCTS ~~ERICA~ TECH~lC~L SUP~LY THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. AOUA ft EN C: OAF• ARCO GLASS , MJPROP AROOW-PlSCO~ JUC~ PALPH w. ~T~JN~ON BAKrR PLY~COC CO., JNC. BASIN VALVE"~ ~ECKMAN INOUSTRTAL PtERLY & ASSOCIATES, INC. r1~ eox R[NUL COi .. BOMAR ~AGNfTO SERVIrr. INC. ~POOKS IN~TP.UMENTS BU~EAU Of GOV RESl~RCH l~f ~URKE r.OMPANY BUTIER fNGINEEfHNGt INC. C t R RfCONOITIONINr. CO• r.Pl CALIFORNIA• INC. CS COMPANY CALIF• WEST H(ATJfliG & Alrt· CONDITIONING CAMPBf.LL H£ATING & AIR CARMENITA FORD TRUCK SALf.S, INC. JOHN CIROLLO rNGINEFPS CA~~JER Al~ CONOJTinNJNG CO C~fVPO~ u.s.A., INC. CLAPK OYE ~APDWARE CONNELL CHfVROLET CONROCK COMPANY CONSr.LIOATEQ ELECTRICAL DIST. CONTINFNJ&L CHEMJCAL CO CO~TINE~T~L RA~IATOP COOPf.R f.~fFGY ~fRVJr.fS C:OSTA MESA AUTC FARTS• INC. CAL CO~SOLJ~ATED ~ATEP ~T~Tf CF C~LJFO.~NJA GAILY F'llt'l r.ANIEL~ TJF~ ~FRVJCE lOM rA~fS rr.t::Krn JNSTl:UHf'l'O SL•HLY co. ot.cn n c-l PH r;: Y ~ T ~ P.' S • P'C • AMOUNT 1366. •JO S.68 • r.n u 1. ?.4!5. 99 U;498el!'J $196.90 $158.05 S2i9'!>6.i42 i:H,913.72 Stl2.lf0 $'lt.75 Slt%3.24 S385.88 S757 e50 Slf00e60 f.'i50e00 S82:Je~ll S117.P.4 $34 2. If~ $24 !)• 00 S.3 t. 80 $16,658.00 ·i~S:J; O(' $lf 1'6.96 Sl6e95 S33i86 us.,e $36.57 SA7'3e86 $q!JO • Oll H£.,7-.:.6.5('1 ! 123.98 S't'H. 73 i'H5e29 S'ltlfSlf.~7 S.5t994e3!l $478. ''2 $4,~4".l.88 HH.715 1'3"15.50 '-16 !) • ~?fl $54. 9!'! i3, tri,.85 i.H.39 ~621.lf{' ~-1~8.22 tlt.?."'f. Dt::SCPJPTION Al R FARE- SUBSCR I PTl ON RENEWAL SOLVENTS VEHICLE LEASING LAB SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PUMP· PARTS CHEMICAL COAGULANTS GLASS -·-ELECTRICAL.SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS SHALL HARDWARE ·---vAlVES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WORKERS' COMP. ADMINISTRATORS. TRASH DISPOSAL ENGINE PARTS VALVES ----sEH1NA~·REGISTRAilON BUILDING MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT P2-23-6, VARIOUS PLT. PROJ. ,.i H )1 ,,., •., .. , 1' i ::.:I :-1 '.,! 111 ;.1 i) ' 1 .. ; •I : .. ! -· ---· PUHP· REPAIRS . -i OFFICE SUPPLIES FREIGHT ---AtR -coNDITIONING REPAIRS PLANS AND SPECS REFUND TRUCK PARTS ENGR~ DIGESTER GAS STUDY TRAINING SEMINAR ENGINE Oil, GASOLINE -TOOLS · TRUCK PARTS BUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CHLORINE TRUCK REPAIRS ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS RESIN TANK EXCHANGE, WATER SOFTENER RENTAL ANNEXATION 6358 PROCESSING FEE LEGAL ADVERTISING TRUCK TIRES MEETING EXPENSES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES MINI COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES 'I i 'I '·ii .. ;.:.'. ; ,·, fl F l:~1D 1'10 i·--! i··, ... I"~ r· I hr..:> 1.... :: ! . ! ! . '' h :11 !" • ~J A R F /J ~.q i~ (• • Hlfi':-7 ~:1 ac;ti ... 71 f9C! 1171 7-J'! 011i:·1 ·-71 ?·'~ i•7~ L.~ ~~717·.r4 1'!71 7:.5 n71 7•~(: :' 7 ~ 1'. 7 . , 71 7 i:A "71'1:Jq en t nr. r:71711 "'7~712 •n 1 713 q J 714 f.71715 1'71 716 )71 737 nJt7!A '171 71 c:i (; 7] 1;:• 071721 r.7 l 72~ ;17 J 723 1~11 724 (1 71 7~f, "7]7';f ··11 721 '.1 71 7<.f. l' 71 7~4? '· 7 1 7~0 q 1731 '.7 J 7~? ... 7~.n:~ '•71 7 -~" · 1~ n~, "'7 l 73f n 1) 7"7 .. 7 J 7 .1.~. ·17 ~ 7~t.l :·11111 f; 7 1 7 4 '17) 74 ( •qrG -,.IT l)JST \~<';;KJNr Ctr IHL PROCf:SSINf. !}6Tf 11/:•~/84 F:t'GE kf~ORT NU~REP AP4~ COUNTl SANJTAllCN DISTRICTS OF OR~~C[ COUNTY \I~ NtiOl'l ~f~·PA~ SAL[S ~ SfRVJCE QIGIVYNf. COMPUlF.R S~PVIClS DUMA~ tlESfL l~J~CTJOM nUNN EDWAPO! CORP. fl" CO~PANYt INC. r1~co ~POCt~s fOUJP. co. ~ASTHANt l~C. FALCON OISFr.SAl SERVICE FILTfR SUFPLY r.o. FISC~F.R & PnRTFR CO• FISHER CONTROLS FIS~[R SClfNTIFIC cu • FLO-SY~TE~S CITY OF°FOUNTAIN V~LLEY FOUNTAIN VALlfY LOC~ g SAFf THE FOXBORO ~O~PANY FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORYt INC. GA~AHL LU~~CR CO. GENf.RAL TElf PHONE CO. GllRLICH-MITC~(LLt INC. GREAT LAKES INSTRU~FNTSt INC. H~~ OIFSEL ~ACHINE ~~LPRI~ SUPPLY CO. HALSTED \ HOGG~N, INC. TEO Ae HAMM~TT HARPINGTON INDUSTRIAL ~LASTlCS HOLMES ROOFINr, COet INC. ClTY OF HU~TJNC.TON eEACH HUNTIN~TON BEACH ~ueBER ST~MF J~Pf~IAL AUTO~OTJV[ OISTR. IM~ERI~L WEST C~fMICAL co. JN~AC CLAJ~S ~~IP 11/14/84 ti.MOUNT !.3Hl.;.H H1v26e·1t\ s.t.412.SG t?3R.~O !.746.24 1932-~0 ns2.12 !26.'.33.10 t372.lt6 12tU3.-:t3 $?f'4.33 .S4 3 .46 Sltl76e60 Sl t !l'50e 6:> $36.00 S2t244e65 S3!'1e(•0 S557.66 S9t740•94 Ut69le24 S9•183e'IO !49th34 S8J6e77 $~69.59 !2i:J3eOD S443e63 $5t]:). 0(1 S9t9~6•9~ ··~32.9~ 114q •. ,f. DESCRIPTtON TOOLS HINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE ENGINE PARTS PA I NT SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES SLUDGE HAULING AND DISPOSAL ENGINE PARTS PI PE· SUPPLIES REGULATOR PARTS LAB SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS WATER USEAGE LOCKS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LAB ANALYSIS LUMBER --TELEPHONE GEAR BOX PARTS LAB SUPPLIES TRUf K··REPA I RS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTROL EQUIPMENT VACUUM TRUCKING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ROOF REPAIRS WATER USEAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS FERRIC GHLORIDE COMPUTER REPAIRS ? INTEROX A~fPICA !~VINE FA~CH WATEP rISTRICT J~S~f( ArrLJ~NCf ~E~VIC[ co. p.F. JCHN M~ULING S7tlS2e4!i q43.~B S47t676.68 $".~·fl ' 1 ;>q!'l. i;n HYDROGEN PEROXIDE DOSEAGE SYSTEM WATER USEAGE K.[,Ce COHFANY KAQ FRODUCT~ KAS SAF~TY PRQOUCTS ~TNF PfARJNr. IHr. KJRSl ~UMP F M~CHlNf ~QRKS L·R·~-~., 1~r • w.k. L~n~wJG c~. LAF~v·~ eL06. ~~TfPlAL~. I~~. H.V. LAWNMASTr~ & CO, INC. l~PNfR PHOTO, INC. ''·E-q6.75 $.l\lf •62 ~. 12 in5.2c; $l~q.P.2 'f.'.?tR2t:>.78 15·61~.~4 n1:i.0 2 ticn.~r· sn. J4 !~3.15 qc;.41 ( REFRIGERATOR WOOD SHAVINGS CONTRACTOR 3-2~-I FREIGHT SAFETY SUPPLIES BEARING SUPPLIES fiUMP PARTS WELDING SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TOOLS TESTING P2-26 FILM PROCESSING .;) . ! • ( I ~ .-- ., . ! ' i. .. ( i: !'."' 1. :::: Ii .. ;i:::. .. I 'vl I ::: I ,. i l·t ! :' ! ~ l"': •• '~ .. ( FlH!L' 11•0 ~!.I'. RP l. r 1 ~:Cl • i• 7 i 1 't,, "71 744 '.'7171t!i !"<7 ~ 746 ! 1 ! '?117 •, 7 l 7411• l:7l 749 '."7 l 7~:; f•7 ! 751 ,, 7 1 752 '71 7" ~ r. 7 l 754 •n115~ l'7 J 756 ':!7}757 ''7 l 7~H "7 1 7~9 'H 1 no .~ 71 7f-1 ".'71 7f.2 1'7 l 763 !:717M •\7] 765 !'71 76£~ li71767 ~117f8 ':71 76'? ... 1177·1 \71 771 f 71 77;> •;7! 7B 1'71774 r, 71 77~. 11 7 l 77~ '1 7! 777 '"7 J 711' ':7?77" i 71 iP..'! 17)7~l '!711~':' 17! H'!' .; 1 7114 ~117~c :q) 7S>~ ·~ 7 ! 7f', 7 • 71 7F P ( .. , ~,re • JT DIST ~CP~l~r tA~ ITAL ~~CC~SSING O"TE Jl/1P/84 fAGE F.fPORT NU~EER ~FA3 COUNTY SA~JTATJON nJSTPICTS Of OR~NGF ClUNTY Cl~I~S rA!P ll/14/P4 Vf NC('IH Ltwr~ ELlCTRJC c~. llf:IHJI\!$ OTSTRIRUTOPS• INC. l05 ANG~LES TJMFS LO~PY P. AS~OCJ!TES r. ~ l TP.UfK AOOY ~AfWEN SU$CO MARV"C EltCTP.ONJCS ~ATT -C~LOR, INC. MILLf.PS PRTl\ITf.PY HINf S!f(TY APPLl~NCES COi ~ONTGOMERY CLEVATC-R co~rANY J. ARTHUR HOORr, Cl't ll\IC. MOTOROLAt JNCt MYCO INOUSTPJ[S NATIONAL S~FETY COUNCIL rcc1or.~TAL CHfMJCAL CORP. OCCJOEHTAL COLLfGf-CASHJER OC£AN SALT co •• INC. OLYH~IC CHEMJr.~L COe OR~NGE VALVf & FJTTINf. CO. OR ITEX CORF OXYG!="N SE"RVICE: COUNTY OF OUNGf co. OF O~ANG£-~UOITOR CONTROLR COUNTY SANITATION ~ISTRICTS-OF-ORANGE COUNTY FACIFIC BELL PAP TS UNL IMJ Tf.D PrRO~IOATJO~ SYSTEMS, INC• FHtl~DFLPHJA ~EAR CORP ~ONTON JNUUSTRTES, INC. HAROLC P~J~POSf lf.E MIKf PPLJCH ~ ~ONS P.AFFERTY INTfP.~ATIONll TRUr.K~ PAJ~~OY ~ISFOS~l CO. O( -CY-Kl(f.N CCH'P • THf P.f.f,JSHP ~OfiRINS & .. EYE"R~ R~rco•s TRUCK WR(CKI~C SA~!COtJ INC. YV ONNf SC Hi: r.P. ~H~MFOC't< SUPF-LY ~ (Ill H' r. ')A S T 0 FF I C ( [ (HJ T F "1 f N T S~uTHEPN CALIF. [OJ~q~ CO. su. CALIF. f~JSON en. SO. CAL. r-As C( .• !O~T~f~N rru~TJF~ OTL ~n. AM tllJN T iee?.. 51 !2.H.H s l. 1 ')If. ·l~ f.19-.176.43 S1 ,~,~.·JO $1;)9.?Ei !9 ~. 7E- 'ilf0 l'.51 SS0.24 l9f.•q4 $328.4~ $':1Jl5.?.3 $'fr} 9 i 82 S2J9.tO S60e00 S4t237illf s.s:rn.~o $32 2 .13 i71't?.3li08 S1. 365. 71 S4lf9e4lf S219ill~ 161/f .51 is5.3qry.oo SltlA7i64· $111.49 Ut2A9.80 il5•1?.l.;37 :H l • 92 !J • 76 f.757.~f'I $3 ~. 00 t"'~h 165. f.\' '$58 .11 $355•'10 1127.!>2 1561.~2 S.'t2. 't5 U .~6:J.•H1 :r.52,714.~c it"?. 3~ •£5.~ltt.~5 !.2. 'l '.1 2. '~ c;~4.i:,1i:,.;.t'? "\6 !l. u l' 1s.2.l1.:>0 'f}l),29:>.lil'f CESCRJPTION ELECTRIC CART PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LEGAL ADVERTISING ENGR. 2-25 TRUCK PARTS PIPE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES PRINTING SAFETY SUPPLIES PLANT #2 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE PIPE SUPPLIES ELECTRl£Al SUPPLIES SHALL HARDWl\RE SEMINAR REGiSTRATION CAUSTIC SODA OCEAN MONITORING SALT CHLORINE PIPE SUPPLIES BEAR I NG SUPPLIES ·-··SPE·C-1 Al::TY BASES LAB ANALYSIS COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES ·---RE·I MBURSE WORKERS 1 COMP; ·FUND TELEMETERING TRUCK PARTS -HYDROGEN PEROXIDE GEAR BOX PARTS FLOW METERS INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE CONTRACTOR 3-28R TRUCK PARTS TRASH DISPOSAL ENGINE PARTS LEGAL ADVERTISING PUMP PARTS TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR l-2R-2&3 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE TOOLS, SMALL HARDWARE OFFICE FURNITURE POWER CSDOC 15 REPAIRS NATURAL GAS DIESEL FUEL (, !. I·· )1 I·! I i.! J•I - r ttt•(; r·10 \U:FPJ.l·T ~·0. ,., L, ::: !.,::::> .. I 'I .i:: :: I j:· I •· Hl 7P.~ ;·71 7 9•• 1!7 ~ 7~ I H l 7~? ~7~ B~ "7 ~ 79A ,":717'?5 "7~ 7% t"·71. 797 r•7 J 7°1;1 •:7!7C:C r:7 ! I<'.•!"· r 7 lF' (' 1 ~7Jfl:? :; 71 "~ ~ 1•7 1 ~ "'' 1·7) P.:11'\ "7 l $l .·~ 117) '""ti 7 1'!7J H=R r•7 ! FIJ~ ~71 ~H i•7ll!1] •· 7 If· l? !"~7 HJ3 ll71PJ4 ':7H'l5 1·7 tf lli ,. 7 J ~ l 7 ' 7'~ ~' 1- n 7pi1 c:i ( .;. ':'•l Jl rtST W~P~JNf r~PIT~L FFOC[SSJUG DATF ll/~~/A4 ~AGE Rf~ORT NUMRf P AP43 COllNTY S.HJITAllON l:)')TPJCrs Of Of!~t<;G[ COUNTY Vf Nf•OR SPFEOf SPEfDOM~TEP D~NNTS STE~~fNSON ~UrERICR ll~E & CHE~lCAL cnpr. THf SUJ.IPL l f~S J. W~YN~ SYLV(STfR TAK U KAHH![ TICOR TITLE JNSURA~CE TRA~SA~F.P.ICA O(LAVALt INC. . TRUr.K g. AUTO SUPPLY• me. TUP.ESALFS .. 1.c;. TUCKfQ R SON, INC. TIJRPOCHARGfFt me. FRANK UL Tl MO UNION CIL CO. OF CALIF. UNIT£~ PARCEL SERVICE UNIVERSITY SALfS g Sf.PVJr.E VWP SCIENTIFIC VALLEY r.111rs SUPFLY co. VALLEY E~GINE i M~C~INE VALVE & STEfL SUPPLY CO. VAkECt INC. CLAIMS FAIC 11/14/84 AM OlJN T 01.19 115.q9 $7~5.79 SRE.1.lj5 SH4.33 i2t99'l.l'l!l ~375.:J!) !.572.3P. SS t U9 l • 3i.I $~17.?.R S2t5l3elf2 1.5tl'l3.67 $21685.')0 $89.23 S51f .95 S363e68 $971.43 S1t72 3. 81' DESCRIPTION TRUCK REPAIRS EMPLOYEE HI LEAGE BUILDING MATERIALS TOOLS, SAFETY SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PLANT MAINTENANCE 7-8 TITLE FEES ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS TUBING SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS -·· RETENTION PW-116 GASOLINE DELIVERY SERVICE ·TRUCK· REPAIRS LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES ·TRUCK REPAIRS VALVES PIPE SUPPLIES ·---·-FREIGHT " VIKING FREIGHT SYSTFMSt INCi LARRY ~~LK£F A~SOCIATESt INC. JOtir\I Re ~APLES S?31i69 \564.54 S4t515e44 ·S3He?.5 S8t8~Fl.63 $393.6£, Slt:JOAe4R u' 061. 1)6 $7.)9.98 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT P2-23-6 ODOR CONSULTING ~AUKESH~ FNGJNE S£PYICENTER WfSTCOAST ROTORt INC. WESTALLOYt INC. WESTJNf.HOU~f ELECTRIC CORP T~OHAS L. ~oor~ufft INC. Y ·· TI Pf. ZIP TEMPORARY PF.RSONNEL TOTAL CLblM~ FAIO ll/14/P'l Sl t520i8l\ '462.:')5 $4H. 23 $636•8!l t1;n.2q1.s~ ================= ( ENGINE PARTS PUMP PARTS WELD I NG· SUPPL I ES ELECT~ICAL SUPPLIES ~ONFERENCE EXPENSES TRUCK TIRES TEMPORARY HELP ... t ( ,. '. i.1 1 ) '. i . ' ~ 'I 1( "' 1. ::: ·~ I V'"! . ::: ( ( •. FUND NO 9199 JT WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/08/84 REPORT NUMBER AP43 SUMMARY #2 OPER FUND #2 ACO FUND #3 OPER FUND #3 ACO FUND 113 F/R FUND #5 OPER FUND #5 ACO FUND #7 OPER FUND #7 F/R FUND #11 OPER FUND #5&6 ACO FUND #6& 1 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. JT WORKI~~ ~APIT~L .F~~~. CLAIMS PAID 11/14/84 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/14/84 AMOUNT $ 3,717.59 19, 176.lt3 9,724.70 U.HQ.~3 35,125.40 236.45 ~02.85 9,039.71 375. 00 .. ---.. ---.. ·---. . -5 • 2 ~ ~ • 0 ~ 181. 26 10,005.52 35i.137.57 147,892.57 INSURANCE FUND 1,737.64 ..... ----· .. ··-----. §i.99~.~3 ·--- $720,297.59 ( PAGE 5 '.,j I ,., (•, . I -n •... ii ::·:1 l;-l ~ II f ~ I •. l·.1 '" I., ~:i 1 1 ' 5~· ,. tt 1:: c ---lu " j.: 1 .. ,,. I I':: :1 1 ::.:: I .;. i·. 1.::1 ':'.i r.:1 ; I : I I.. i, I I , I • FllNU fvO WA PP. H:T N~. t.71~63 C71116't 071P65 07JA66 H1~t:7 <·11 rie.a 071869 CJ7H70 ~17187 J 1' ~.. 071&72 · · ntn3 '•1 , .. ! I i ': r111eH 071~75 (17J 876 07 lf 77 H1fl78 r.11a19 i 1 ..... I;~ t).:I (.1 JfHHi 071AH1 07lf.82 071P.A3 071 RM 07lfik5 071AP.6 0718117 11 f-:;;.& I • ·::: :.: 071RRA . C7rn~9 1 · r!11~qo 071J:l~l 07lf.92 l\7lb93 07 J A94 r.7 H.95 . 071P96 ·"' ll7H97 071~9A fl71~9CJ 1'\71°uO r.11ao1 1)7) CllJ2 "7 l ~· .i:3 n1 t q(''t 1)7t ~'15 f;71 CJt•6 'J71c;r-7 1~71 (, ·J(~ 91;9 -JT OJST ~OAKINb CA~ITAL PROCfSSING DATE 11/261e4 PAGE Rf PORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITAlJON OISTRJCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAl~S PAID lll2RIA4 H tJl.iP.P ACf DRAPERY CO. ACTION INSTRUHfNTS• INC. AOVANC 0 CO~STRUC TCr. s. I PJC. AIR CALIFORNIA ALF~·LAVALt INC. ALLEN £LCCTRJC CO. AM[fflCAN DISTRICT lCLEGRAPH AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTlON ANC.[LICA R[NTAL S[RVICrs GROUP loQUA BEN CORP. ARROW·~ISCOt INC• ARROWHEAD ELECT~IC CORP. RALPH W• ATKINSON AC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLYe INC• llJL ARY BAKrP BANK OF AMERJCi NT & SA BASIN VALVES bECK~AN INSTRU~ENTS J.P. Bf[CHCR A~soc •• INC. RO~rRT BEJNeWJLLIAH FROST ~ ASSOCIATES ANTHONY fHSHOP ALA~[, MOFFITT & TOWNE BRENNEP-FIEOLER ' Assoc., IN~. B~~STOL PARK MEDICAL GRPat INC BAITHINEE ELECTRIC ~UTIER ENGINEERING, INC, CALJr. lSSOC. OF SAN. AGENCI£S JOHN CAROLLO ENGJNEEPS JOHN CAROLLO ENGl~EERS COHPRESSOR & l~OUSTPJAL CONROCK COHPANY CO~SOLIOATEO flfCTPIC~l DJ~T. CONSOLJDATCD R£PRODUCTIONS CONTJNCNTAL CHEMICAL Ct COOFER ENERGY SEPVlCf.S CAL WATER ['M( • I NC. O[C~fR INSTRUMENT SUPFLY rn. (1[(0 OHPhl SYSH.'4S, INC. Dl~IOYN( COMPUl[~ SfRVIClS OO~ADO ENT[RFRISESt INC. OWY(R JNSTRU~fNTt INC• £ASTMAN, INC. l l\:CH/llHE. R, J Nr., AHOUNT Sle195a68 S362.59 S251 tfs32.'JO sne.oo Slf11!5Ra95 S24t591a03 ssa. ao S583e37 $CJt6flli35 $l25e00 S14t602all'I S592•24 '162.72 Slt063a21f S83110 S53.30 Sle085a57 st. n1. 75 1173.85 S281a96 $2t50(h 00 $23. 78 Ht721.56 S411•tl9 Sl3e00 Sl t 053. 8.9 '70t'.>62e90 s~s:>.oo S2t282a82 Sl0qtb35.07 $570.00 $208.72 S3,522e4l u,903.12 U,99Rel0 \q6.25 H42. 7!> 1976. 2(, t2it0.51i \jA5. 8~ 1-li5 :J. 'l(J $807.~0 S2 ,.3t,R.4CJ $117.19 S'f07.65 s.~.c;oJ.llD DESCRIPTTON WINDOW COVERINGS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR:e2:2s=2 AIR FARE ENG I NE PARTS CONTRACTOR PW-118 ALARM SYSTEM MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES CSDOC #3 MANHOLE REPAIRS TOWEL RENTAL CHEMICAL COAGULANTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS .. ·wt RE EMPLOYEE MILEAGE TRAVEL EXPENSES VALVES LAB SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES "ENGR: 7-9 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES COMPRESSOR PARTS PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMS ·I ,··; ., !11 ! i ELECTRICAL REPAIRS . ·ENGR;· P2=--23;;;6, VARIOUS PLANT-PROJECTS, CLAIM REVIEW;-~ CONFERENCE REGISTRATION ENGR. P2-25-2 ENGR. P2•26, Pl•21, P2-28, 'ENERGY TASK FORCE COHPRESSOR PARTS BUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION CHLORINE ENGINE PARTS WATER SOFTENER RENTAL ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES COMPUTER PROGRAMMING HINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE PLANT #2 REPAIRS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFF I CE SUPPLIES OCEAN MONITORING ( ( •. , ( ) 9 ' I r-1 ( FUND t.•o WARR Ii ~T l'JO. 071C109 011c;1~ 1. 071911 ; I (17)912 'l71913 011c;11t (171915 i' 071916 I· 071 ql 7 !, I 371916 •. 071919 I 1'171~2() 01tcn1 I i'I I 07SCl22 071~23 071 ~24 1)71525 r , .. ~: lf.! f"-,.)i r I 1 .• C7JCl26 071927 071928 071929 '.)7193(: C71~31 071932 071933 071 ~3'l fJ71 ~35 !.· 1171936 r.71937 C7193A 071939 ('71 IJ'IO ('71 'Jltl 07JQ4? G71<l43 07 1944 071~J4fl 071946 071947 071948 011c;49 071550 !.171~!>1 071~52 f.7 l q53 r. 71 C:,!>4 I • ·~ ( 91~9 -JT DIST WCRKJN~ C~PlT/IL PROCESSING DATE 11/26/84 PAGE RfPORT ~UMBER Af43 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF O~AN~E COUNTY VC t!OOR FALCON DISPOS4L SERVICf FISCH[R & PORTER CO. fl~HfR CONTPOLS CO• FISHER SCJ[Hllf IC CO. FLO-SYSTEMS fLOYO-kOPDIC~t J.V. FO~DORC/JORDAN, INC CITY Of FULLERTON GAHAHL LUMBER CO• GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. GIEPLICH•HJTCHELLt INC. GRAPHIC CONTROLS H-B INSTRUHENT COMPANY HeRe NURSERY HACH COMPANY LARRY HALL'S w.c. HfNOP.lf. & co., INC. CITY OF HUNTJNGTON·BEACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH JNGRAH PAHR INSTRU~ENTATION LABORATORYtlNC THE JANITOR'S SHOPFE CLAIMS PAID 11/28/84 AMOUNT n 1. 7qq. 25 s2eo.oo S15?.11 S.20.45 Sl.403.75 S35t9't9e12 $ 757.66 stl9.19 S171.23 S657e0l Sl90e::Jlf'\e!l8 S335e't6· $133.58 S28.o\l S53li80 U85.50 $51'l.37 su.~o-- S268tJ26.25 S1 t620.21 DESCRIPTION SLUDGE HAULING AND DISPOSAL PIPE SUPPLIES REGULATOR PARTS LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PW-132 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE TOOLS TELEPHONE BELT F 1.L TER PRESS CONTROL UN lTS -·--·--·-·· ELEHR I CAL. SUPPL I ES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES · --LAB SUPPL I ES TRUCK REPAIRS PIPE SUPPLIES --------WATER-USEAOE SEHi ANNUAL WARNER RELIEF II PAYMENT JANITORIAL SUPPLIES · -·--·-LAB· SUPPL I ES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ( t<.r.c. CO~PJaNY KAMAN BEARINGS & SUPPLY · S392e20 SS 3.23 U2t'i36.60 f.300. 70 s1.233.63 S73.67 '36BeOCJ S25.&'i !172.95 s22.so $123.26 CSDOC #3 MANHOLE REPAIRS, CONTRACTOR 3-2~-1 ····-----BEAR I NG·· SUPPL I ES KJ~G B[ARINGt INC. KLEEN-LINE CORF- L •~• \hS et INC• LERUER ~HOTOt INC. LlWCO ELECTRIC CO. LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUP~LY CttARLOTH M. H6.PTJN MARVAC ELECTRONICS MCHASTfH-CARR SUPFLY CO. J. ARTHUR MOORf t CA, INC. r.r. HORITl FOUNDRY MOTOR ~IM ' WHEEL SlRVJC[ HOTOf{OlJa• INC. MYCO INOUSTll HS NATIONJal LU~eEP ~UPPLY NHIO"JAL SAflIHf.Y SUPPLY ~ELSON-DUNN, INC. CITY or ~E~~ORT ~lACH NUHATIC ENGJNECkJN~ OCCJOfNTAL r.HEHJCAL COP.F. OLY~FIC CHfHJC~L CO. O~A~GE VALV[ & FJTTJN~ CO. S16.08 $211.32 s2e2.15 $646.60 'Hl 8 •. H SttR.16 $58.67 H?i.19 UH .~q ~·275. !f2 '1').80 $3'1 u .51 $9,723.11 f35t955.39 1Vt2. 7~ BEAR I NG SUPPLIES SHALL HARDWARE ·~ELDING SUPPLIES FILM PROCESSING ELECTRIC CART PARTS SAFETY SUPPLIES LIABILITY CLAIM SETTLfHENT ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES MANHOLE RINGS & COVERS TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SHALL HARDWARE SHALL HARDWARE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES EHGINE PARTS WATER USEAGE COMPRESSOR PARTS CAUSTIC SODA CHLORINE VALVES '.i i·: • I ·,1 .. , ·' :·I ~ ! ~ ·:·.j I• ; ~ ! ! ; : ! ··1·' ; ·! ., I ) ~ • F U~JO rJO lJftRR /l"'T NO. 071955 n l <:156 07llj!i7 lJ7 l C·!'-0 lJ71959 071960 071961 071%2 1"71 963 071%4 !l7 l ?65 1171966 071967 i.,· n 1 c;;c.u : .• 071%9 1 •• : 0 71970 .,: 0 71 q71 :: t.d' 1 ·. \>I. :; 1. • 071c;72 G71973 071971\ 071975 071976 071977 07197~ 071~79 071980 0719P.1 r:7I9f\2 Co71~~3 071';;M ti71~8S 071986 071987 ~7J c;i:-e 1171~89 (•7)c;;Cj(; 071Cl~l fJ7] 9<:t2 ti719°3 r!7) C•~llf •l7 l qc;,5 11719% 07JC~C,7 Ci 71'~9l' 0719~9 onroo 91q9 -JT DIST ~ORKJNb CAPITAL PROCESSING DAlE 11/26/84 PAGE REPORT NUHA£R AP43 3 ( CPUhTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY CLAT"S PAID 1112~/84 VEN OOH ORCO BLOCK C'Oe' INC• COUNTY OF OFUNGE o.c. [~PL. R£TIR£HENT SYSlf.P. PACJFJC MOBILr OFFIClS PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPH£NT CO. F~CIFIC B£LL FARAGON BUSINESS SYSTEMS NORMAN PARSOt-IS FARTS UNLIMJTEr PASCAL & LUDWIG POSTMASTER OUAKER SUPPLY CO THE REGISTER THE REGISTER REMARKABLE FPO~UCTS• INC THE REPUBLIC SUFPLY CO. OF CALIF., INC. RE~NORD ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS REYNOLD ALUHJNUH SUfPLY CO. ~ICOH COPP ROS£HOUNTt INCe JOSrPH le RYERSON & SONt INCi SANCON INC. SAND DOLLAR au~INESS FOP.MS SANO TIRES UNLIHITEO SANTA ANA DATSUN SA~TA ANA ELECT~IC MOTORS SANTA ANA OFFICf SUPPLY CO• SEAL BLACK SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. S.F. SfRRANTINO SHiHP.OCK SUPPLY S" ITH•EHER Y CO. SOUlH COAST OFFIC[ EOUJPH[NT SOUTHERN rALJF. EDl~O~ CO. SO. CAL. GAS CO. SO. CALIF. WATEP. COe SOUTHERN COUNTllS OIL CO. SPAR~L£TTS CPJNKING WATER ~PfCJALJZED PRODUCTS CO• STAINLlSS FJPE & FITTING CC. ~TINSON ELEClRJC ~rECIALTY er.. SUPrRIDR Ll~E & CHEMICAL CORP. 39 STAKE & BUJLOING SUPPLJ~S s.&. TttOfOSt JfJC. lHO~PSON LACQUE~ CO. CHANNON C. TIA AMOUNT s1,302.a6 S734.25 .oo $150.52 $226.81 S297e1l S1 ,395.00 S53e30 S178e76 t78t858.44 $211\JOO.GO Sl36e86 S2t267e95 Slt375.51 S20elf5 f.328.93 $')8.58 Sl ,599. 82 $313.46 S398e24 f.892•92 S3,76le52 $88.51 Slf5.79 s222.01 S908e94 $68i11 $1115.75 t.263.0't $186.60 $2,609.89 l'J9.(10 $211..5.80 $80t279.54 S3i.l t 999. 76 '19•14 sE.,tJo\8.51 $$330.75 S61.fi8 t.112.63 !-128.6~ f.2tl76.lll: S26:le34 sso,077.69 S187.62 S:?3.58 ( OE"SCRIPTION BUILDING MATERIALS ANNEXATION HAPS, SURVEY 3-24-1 VOIDED TEMPORARY OFFICE TRAILER RENTAL SAFETY SUPPLIES TELEMETER I NG COMPUTER ANALYSIS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR P2-26 POSTAGE PIPE SUPPLIES CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING OFFICE SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES STEEL STOCK COPIER RENTAL PIPE SUPPLIES ···· · ·STEEL· STOCK VALVE SUPPLIES, CONTRACTOR l-2R-2&3 TYPESETTING TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC MOTOR OFFICE SUPPLIES BUILDING MATERIALS TOOLS CONFERENCE EXPENSES TOOLS TESTING P2-2 6 OFFICE FURNITURE POWER NATURAL GAS WATER USEAGE DIESEL FUEL BOTTLED WATER LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES CRANE RENTAL BUILDING MATERIALS LUMBER USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT PAINT SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE MILEAGE . ..._, '· ( ·.,' i .: i·:; ,I , I .. ! -.. ~ ( FUMO NO , WAfc R U·1T l\!O • 1'' I'': l'72 ::01 1)7 2JJ2 fl72003 •172t•lllf 07,~.05 0720(•f, j... 072Cn •,. 072flOR 1,.· fJ72f:!l9 I ' 012u10 ( ..... ·:· ., 91Qq -Jl PJST ~CF~lHC r~PJTAL PPOC£SSING DATE 11/2~/84 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION nISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VE NlJOP TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY• INC. TU&ESALES U.S. AUTO GLASS• INC. UNtrrn PARCEL fERVIC[ UMJTlD ST~TES £QUJPrFN1 co., INC. V\Ht SC lENTIFIC VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. GEORG[ F • YE IT CLAIMS P~IO 11/28/8/f ~M.OUN T Ulf9e75 Slf't5e20 S123e!'IO O[SCPIPTION TRUCK PARTS TUBING · TRUCK REPAIRS DELIVERY SERVICE COHPRESSOR PARTS -· LAB SUPPL I ES PIPE SUPPLIES BUILDING HATERIALS ··LAB REPAIRS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 4 i ., 072Jll ,.. 072 012 !.· 072013 wr~~AR MARINE fLECTPONICS WESTINGHOUSf ELECTRIC CORP ~HJTEt FINE & VERVJLL£ WILS~N FORD SALES $If o. 43 S308e 77 Sltl66.i99 $2lf5.CJ7 Slt066e33 $73•90 Slt2llel8 S899el0 $3 7 e lfl Slt368ell8 $1 1h2l 9e 00 Sl3t279•55 i5t3.6'4 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY 1., 072014 WOLO£R ENGINEERING, l~C THOMAS Le MOODRUFft INC. )l(RO)I' CORP• !·, 0, 7 ~fll 5 .1 072l'lf. tEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES 1.,: I I .... 1.~ :~ 1..·1 i .P I ~ I 4"i I l I. I: I; l ~. i ,··. SUHHARY #1 OPER FUND #1 ACO FUND #2 OPER FUND #2 ACO FUND 113 OPER FUND #3 ACO FUND 113 F/R FUND 15 OPER FUND 115 ACO FUND #6 ACO FUND fl.7 OPER FUND #7 ACO FUND 17 F/R FUND #11 OPER FUND Ill ACO FUND 111 F /R FUND 113 ACO FUND 115&6 OPER FUND #6&7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF TOT~L CLAIMS PAID 11/2~/84 SELF FUNDED LAIBILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 11/28/Blt $1.,411,044.19 ================= $ AHOUNT 200.00 i,351:20- 501 • 51 3,}69~08 13,761.23 8,449.61 9,017.~3 5,825.88 751 • 32 8,784.40 3,658.03 2,81t3.71 77. 38 ; 676.09 536.99 268,026.25 638.50 3,675.13 14.35 222,928.27 749,616.24 143.26 106,391.93 $1,ltl1,044.19 --··TRU£K PARTS ·- CONTRACTOR PW-122 LEGAL SERVICES XEROX REPRODUETION VALVES •• ( :Ii ! I ' .... l :,, :··!) I . . ; i i '' . ; ! I ; ~ :::i 1. ~ ) i ! ; '· ) ) I :··1) .1j I .I 1:-: ) 'I I" , .. ) ;., """" • " . :·. ~.--!.' • ;._~.~-:. . . ' .... :.. : · .. --·: • -.a •.• • .... -~--... :: -. -... ·.- LOCATION OF ONSITE (OW1, OW2, OW4) DOWNGRADIEN1 (1W1, FRENCH DRAIN), GROUNDWATI (IW2, IW3) EXTRACTION \r/ELLS, AND TEMPORARY STORAGE TANK~ .. . ---- \ I I I ; t ·, ' j ' i -, ' .. ' lQI MID-CANYON INTERCEPTION WELLS TO PREV EXTRACTION GROUNDWATERS :.~ . DOWN CANYON RATING .' .. ,,. ·-I ~---·-_•, _ .. --.- -.. _:·J_>r --~---.-------=· ~---------! ..:..:__.~_-.:~~-~./~_:_:-, .. ~.-.·.""'· .. ·-=---·-:._-: --. -. -. :::. ;:;7,-~ -.... ----. ·- .J -··-_ L . I ~ . . -. . .... , ..•... . . , .. ,. ., . . ' -----~:. .. -a&"& I'\" .K.-.;;&llr ----: Sf'il'·:r !~ ... :a~• -·-·-I&-.•& A .. &•4'&._.1&: .. r: 'll&f!•~-~~ 9: .. ~:&•• ...... : .. . . . : ·~.: .. . l ---. ---:--- .. --·. . . -.-···----·-".-.... ~---·· -· -----·-;--···~.:.~ ... ---,-·-:- : ......... -·· ···-::i1··:~··,: -·' ' \ .1- f ... _ ' \ .,.___ \ .... tt -~ .. ·:·-.... -..:;_ .. -····-·: ' --. ·-·~--------·.'-~: ---:--'"• \- --L. :..:....··-.... L ... ·-· .. -~--.:.· !. .. r.. WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY ~ ANA REGIONAL INTERCEPTOR AUGUST 1982 ------------------ · ....... ·-........... ·, : .... '..-... ; .. ~ .... .-._, ~ ·-·~-~ ! :i :,\ \ ...... ·-·-· ..... -· .. .. ..... ···---··-·· .•.. ~-·~ . . . ~;. : "' l ., ./ . ' .. ._, . ..... I ~-/ / ~ .. -~""':. . -_.., ·---, .. ~ .. . ,- --·~----. i ~l ·-a -.-:----=+--.. :.... • t ~ .-, . Id~ • .1 .,. -· ·~· :' t--__ . · SANTA AN SANT . --------------· --------