The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-10-10COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAYJ October 3, 1984 NOTICE OF REGUL~R MEETING DISTRICTS NOS I 1, 2;' 3., 5., 6., 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY., OCTOBER 10., 1984 -7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY~ CALIFORNIA TELEPHCN ES: AREA CCOE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Bo~rds of Directors of County Sanftation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. ~ Sec e£arY Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF -Wednesday, October 17th at 5:30 p.m. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE -Tuesday, October 23rd, at 4:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE -Wednesday, October 24th at 5:30 p.m. BUILDING COMMITTEE -Tuesday, October 30th at 5:30 p.m. October November December January February March April May June July August September October COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX ai 27 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 V (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings Oct 10, 1984 Oct 24, 1984 Nov 14, 1984 Nov 28, 1984 Dec 12, 1984 None Scheduled Jan 9, 1985 Jan 23, 1985 Feb 13, 1985 Feb 27, 1985 Mar 13, 1985 Mar 27, 1985 Apr 10, 1985 Apr 24, 1985 May 8, 1985 May 22, 1985 Jun 12, 1985 Jun 26, 1985 Jul 10, 1985 Jul 24, 1985 Aug 14, 1985 None Scheduled Sep 11, 1985 Sep 25, 1985 Oct 9, 1985 Oct 23, 1985 :-.... 41~ · · ~ .-BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 1 II County Sanitation Districts of· Oranse County, C.lifomla JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE OCTOBER 10, 1984 -T: 30 p IM·.· , Post Office Box 8 l 27 10844 EIUs Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Cede 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN ADDITION) STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:OU P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3l ApPC)intment of Chairmen pro· tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items (5) Consideration of motion to rece.ive and file minute excerpts, if any • . .....,_; See supplemental agenda · ~ (6) EACH DISTRICT (7) ACT-ION: . . If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved ~s mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 .. -September 12, 1984, regular September· 26, 1984, adjourned October 3, 1984, adjourned District 2 -September 12, 1984, regular District 3 -September 12, 1984, regular District 5 -September 12, 1984, regular District 6 -September 12, 1984, regular District 7 -September 12, 1984,. regular District 11 -September 12, 1984, regular ALL DISTRICTS ·Reports of: (a) Joint· Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See page(s) aA" and aB• ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - Joint Working Capital Fund Self-Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICTS NOS. S & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS.·6 & 7 JOINT 9/05/84 $ 529,798.51 1,505,836.31 53,789075 5,018.13 2,942.66 6,538.51 112,193.60 7,464.43 7,254 .. 28 15,211.44 13,299.68 26.20 14.62 $2,259,388.12 CONSENT CALENDAR IT!MS NOS. 9(a) THROUGH 9(p) 9/19/84 $253,379.63 86, 337. 36 69,731 .. 20 1,192.50 9,206.48 9,194.32 41,039.91 855 .. 14 6,790.83 4,873.29 1,020.50 46.65 $483,667.81 ( 9) ALL DISTRICTS All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar· by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in- attendance,. there will be no separate discussion of these items. All item~ on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving· all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- ~--I) 10/10/84 ( 9) ALL DISTRICTS (a) (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins F & G at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-SR-2, making miscellaneous clarifications, changes and additions to said specifications (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-170, to receive and file bid tabulation-and recommendation and awarding contract for Primary Sedimentation Basins F & G at Treatment Plant. No. 2, Job No. P2-SR-2, to Advanco Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $783,464.00. See pages •en and "D" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-171, approving plans and specifications for Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date 10/30/84). See page "E" (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-2S-2, authorizing an addi·tion of $35,192.09 to the contract·with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for 11 miscellaneous items of additional work and granting a time extension of two calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "F" (d) Consideration of motion approv-ing Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Primary Sedimentation Basins P & Q at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26, revising the grading and paving requirements· and modifying· the entrance gate area improvements, at no increase to the contract with Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. See page· "G" (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-172, accepting OPS (Uninterrupted Power Source) System for Plant No. 2 RPU's (Remote Processing Units), Job No. PW-116, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice ot Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "B" (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-173, approving plans and specif !cations for Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date 10/30/84). See page "I" (g) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to issue a purchase order to Motorola Corporation for purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment, Specification No. E-156, for the negotiated amount of $10,248.00 plus tax and freight -3- 10/10/84 r_ 'f ·. ~ ( 9) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-174, to receive and file bid \.,.) tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract to Furnish, Deliver and Supply Chlorine in Bulk at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. C-015, to Olympic Chemical Company at the price of $156.00 per ton. See page "J" (i) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Transamerica Delaval, Inco to Remanufacture Six · Cylinder Beads for the No. 2 Delaval Engine at the Plant No. 1 Blower Building, Specification No. R-016, for an amount not to exceed $25,326.00 plus sales tax and freight (j) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase order to National Filter Media Corporation in an amount not to exceed $40,000.00 plus tax and freight, for Ten (10) Sets of Belts for the Belt Filter Presses at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. E-157, for long-term testing of said belts (k) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim s~mitted by Donald D. St. John, dated August 12, 1984, in the amount of $178.11 for alleged damages to his vehicle due to a rock thrown from a District sludge hauling truck, and refer to • the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a Purchase Order Contract to International Technology Group, Inc. ·for annual maintenance and support services on the new upgraded accounting mini-eomputer system, for an amount not to exceed $18,000 per year; and authorizing cancellation of the existing agreement with.Digidyne Computer Services for maintenance.on the old system DISTRICT 2 (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-176-2 authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex .60 acres of territory to the District located at 243 South Del Giorgio Road in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 60 -Townsend Annexation to·County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "K" DISTRICT 6 (n) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim submitted by Robert and Gayle Hoffman dated $eptember 6, 1984, in the amount of $164.83 for alleged damages to their vehicle due to an improperly seated manhole cover, and refer to the Districts' liability claims administrator for appropriate action -4- -"' ~' ·1 10/10/84 (9) DISTRIC'l' 7 (o) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated September 25, 1984, relative to construction of the Fairview Subtrunk Connection to the Sunflower 'l'runk. See page "L" (2) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase order to c. J. Segerstrom & Sons for construction of the Fairview Subtrunk Connection to the Sunflower Trunk, for an amount not to exceed $19,200.00 (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-179-7, ordering annexation of 3.508 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity near the intersection of La Cuesta Drive, East Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated County of Orange territory, proposed Annexation No. 96 -Horn Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. See page "M" • • END 0!' CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from the consent calendar, if any -s- 10/10/84 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Cormnittee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee 1 s written report (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Summary Staff Report and Recommendation re Industrial Waste Permit Policies and Procedures, dated September 20, 1984 (enclosed with Executive Committee Report) (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-175, approving and authorizing execution of Amendment No. 7 to Agreement for Employment of General Counsel. See page "N" (13) ALL DISTRICTS Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (14) DISTRICT 1 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (15) · DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (16) DISTRICT 3 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda it~s, if any (17) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (18) DISTRICT 5 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRIC'l' 6 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 11 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -6- · ... (24) 10/10/84 DISTRIC'l'S 2 & 7 Consideration of actions relative to the Final Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of proposed District No. 13: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file St~ff Report swmnarizing Final Focused EIR re formation of proposed District No. 13 (Mailed to Directors on 10/1/84) (b) verbal report of environmental consultant, Ultrasystems, Inc. (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments received after public hearing on August 8, 1984 (included in Final EIR document) (d) Additional oral public comments, if any (e) Discussion (f) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Pinal Focused EIR; and certify that said Final Focused EIR has been completed in compliance with the State and District Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (Copy mailed to Directors on 10/1/84) (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-177, certifying the Final Focused EIR on said formation of proposed District No. 13; making certain findings in connection therewith, and authorizing filing of a Notice of · Determination re said formation (Mailed to Directors on 10/1/84) (25) DISTRICT 7 -..._1 Other business-or communications. or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 2 (a) Public Beaiing re proposed Annexation No. 41 -Tract No. 9713 to County ~anitation District No. 2: · ( 1) Open hearing (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summary of the Local Agency Formation Commission's and District No. 2's actions re proposed Annexation No. 41. See page "O" (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file written protests, if any (4) Oral protests, if any (5) Determination of sufficiency of protests, if any (6) Close hearing (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-178-2, ordering annexation of 2.49 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity easterly of Sycamore Street and northerly of Santiago Creek in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 41 -Tract No. 9713 to County Sanitation District No. 2. -7- 10/10/84 (28) DISTRICT 2 Other business or communications Qr supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn -a- f ,, 1 MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Coun ty San itation Districts o f Orange Cou n ty, California JOINT BO A RDS Meeting Date October 10, 1984 -7 :30 p.m. Post Off ice Box 8 127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Va ll ey, Cal if., 92708 Telephones: A rea Code 7 1 4 540-2910 962-241 1 Th e following i s a brief exp lan ation of the more important, non -routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise se lf-explanatory . Warrant lists are enc l osed w i th the agenda mater i al summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meet i ng . To minimize the amount of redundancy and dup li cation in the agenda ma t erial and reduce the number of comments in the Manager's Report, we have expanded the descr i pt io n of the agenda items in the agenda itself , par t icularly with regard to change orders and contracts whi ch have been publ ic l y bid and are within the contract budget or engineer 's est i mate . Detailed change orders are i ncluded in the supporting material as well as the bid t abulations for the contracts beiP-g recomme nded for award . No . 9(a): Approval of Addendum No.land Award of Contract for Rehabilitation of Primary Sediment a tion Basin s F and G at Tr eatment Plant No. 2 , Job No . P2-5R-2 . In June, the Directors approved plans and specifications for Rehabili t ation of Primary S e dimentation Basins F and G at Treatment Plant No . 2 . Included in the project is the rebu i lding of basins w i th new fibe rglass baffles , we i rs and collection mechanisms , necessary concrete repairs, piping , painti n g and electrical work, replacement of existi n g pump bases, installation of a new concrete f floor in the pump room and replacement of t he pumps and piping for s ludge , scum , steam, water and drain systems . (1) Approval of Addendum No . 1: Addendum No . 1 c l arifies t wo sections of the detail e d specifications and four plan sheet and drawing details . Included is the requirement to supply a moisture de t ector alarm on the pump units and other miscellaneou s work. The plan sheet changes inc lude apply ing polyu r ethane coat i ng to all launder walls , changes to t he sludge pumping control wiring diagram and adding control pan e l details and designs . Staff recommends approval of Add e ndum No. 1 . • 10/10/84 (2) Award of Contract: On September 25 , 1984 five bids were received for the rehabilitation of thes e two primary sedimentation basins at Treatment Plant No. 2. The bids ranged from a high of $899,240 to a low of $783,464 submitted by Advance Constructors , Inc. of Upland. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the agenda. The staff recommends award to Advance Constructors , Inc. for their low bid amount of $783,464 . The engineer's estimate for this work was $980,000 . No. 9(b): Approving Plans and Specifications for Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk , Phase II , Job No . I-2R-2A. In August , 1984 the Directors approved preparation of plans and specifications for Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No . I -2R -2A . Authorization for this wo rk was r equested when it was discovered dur i n g the r econstructi on of the Bushard Trunk that hydrogen sulfide gas had corroded the top of a stretch of the reinforced concrete pipe and had severely reduced i ts structural i n t egrity which co uld potentially cause a future collapse of the pipe and street surface . The work involves the placement of a reinforced concrete saddle on the outside top half of the pipe to transfer the earth backfill and traffic loads . around the pipe thus reducing the lo ad stress on the pipe i tse lf. Th e p lans and specifications have now been completed and a tentative bid date of October 30 , 1984 has been established . Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications . The engineer's estimate is $150,000. No. 9(c): Approval of Change Order No . 4 t o Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Plant No . 2, Job No . P2-25 -2 . Change Order No . 4 covers eleven items of work and adds $35,192.09 plus two calendar days to the contract. The ma jor items of work include coat i ng an existing grit chamber overflow structure found to be badly corroded due to hydrogen sulfide attack, replacement of existing waterstops (encased sea l s within a construction joint) which had to be completely chipped o u t of the ex is ting channel walls, repair of corroded discharge piping on the main sewage pumps , installation of a new 3 " plant water header to supply necessary cooling water for all engines in Headworks "C " and instrumentation and electrical control additions . Staff recommends approval of Change Order No . 4 adding $35,192 .09 to the contract for an amended contract price of $3,260,929.68 and a two day time extension . -2 - 10/10/84 No . 9(d): App r oval of Change Order No . 3 to Primary Sedimentation Basins P and Q at Plant No . 2, Job No . P2 -26 . Ch ange Order No . 3 is a no c ost , no time change order which modifies the contract documents to provide for revised general grading , paving and entrance gate improveme nts which were developed for Plant No . 2 after the job was awarded. The changes did not add ma t e rially to the scope of work and no time was necessar y to accomp li sh the work , therefore , the change order is a no cost , no time change order. Staff rec ommends approval of Change Ord er No . 3 . No . 9(e): Acceptance of UPS (Un i nterrupted Power Source) System for Plant No . 2 RPU's (Remote Processing Units), Job No . PW -116 . The contractor , Frank Ult i mo , has fulfilled all contractual obl i gations within th e specified time to provide un interruptible power suppl i es to protect the Plant No . 2 computer remote p r ocessing units from d amage from vo ltage spikes which are relatively c ommon , and to provide a battery backup power source so that ch e RFU 's r emain operable in the event of an isolated power outage . The staff recommends adoption of the reso lutio n attached to t he agenda mater ial author i zing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final closeout agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as requir ed . There were no change orders to this contract. No . 9(f): App r oval of Plans and Specifications for Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No . 2 , Job No . PW -129. The staff has completed preparation of plans and spec i fications for t he installation of a 3 ,000 gallon lube oil storag e tank with pump and piping at the Foster Pump Stat i on for the existing outfall pump engines . The new t ank will r e duce the handling of oil drums now used for oil changes and oi l makeup . Five drums of oil are currently pumped fo r each oil change and makeup oil i s pumped weekly. S i n c e oil can a l so be purchased in bulk , th e staff beli eves i t will be more cost effective i n terms of both materials a nd personnel time to install th e storage tank . A ten tati ve b i d date of October 30 , 1984 has been established . Th e engineer 's estimate is $20 ,000 . The staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications . -3-• r· I • 10/10/84 No . 9(g): Authorize Negotiated Purchase of Two -Way Radio Equipment , Specification No . E -156 . The Districts' two -way radio system is an essential element of the Districts' operations as it provides round-the -clock communications between operations and maintenance personnel within the expansive plant sites , trunk sewer maintenance crews , the industrial waste inspectors and the construction inspection personnel in the field . This system is especially c ritical in emergency situations . T he Districts' existing system is manufactured by Motorola Communications and Electronics , and it has proven highly reliable dur i ng both routine operations and emergencies . The Districts presently have a maintenance agreement with the County of Orange Communications Division to install , maintain and repair the equipment , and the County 's r epair facilities and test equipment a r e set up to service Moto r o l a equipment , which is al s o used extens i vely by the County. Our budget analyst identified and confirmed a need for four t een new pieces of radio equipment to meet our expanding service requirements . The staff has negotiated a price with · Mo t orola for fo u r portable radios , one mobile radio for one of o ur existing unequipped trucks , and nine pagers (handy talkies) for a total cost of $10 ,248 .00 plus tax and freight . This price is approximately 5% higher than the cost of similar equipment purchased under last fiscal year 's communications budget authorizat i on. The staff requests authorization to purchase the equipment from Motorola at the negotiated price of $10 ,248.00 plus tax and freight. The 1984 -85 equipment budget includes $29 ,950.00 for this equipment . No . 9(h): Awa r d of Con t ract for Specification No . C-015 to F ur nish , Deliver and Supply Chlorine in Bulk at Plants No . 1 and 2 . Bid s were rece i ved on S eptember 25th for supplying bu l k chl or i ne for us e in the Di stri c t s ' central iz ed bulk chlor i ne odo r c o n tro l system, which con s ists of one 25 -ton tank and associated di s tribution equipment at Plant No. 1 and two 25-ton tanks and rela ted distribution piping and equipment at Plant No . 2 . Four companies submitted bids ranging from a high of $193 per ton to a l ow of $156 per ton from Olympic Chemica l Company of Wilmington . The Distr i cts are current l y paying· $1 01 .90 per ton for bulk ch l orine , but i ncreased demand for the chemical throughout the i ndustry because of an upswing i n the economy has caused a s i gnificant inc r ease in pr i ce this year. In preparing the 1984 -8 5 -4 - 10/10/84 budget we anticipated a major price increase and appropriated $900 ,000 fo r ch l orine . Howev e r , the bid price is even higher than expected , and , thus , the rev i sed estimated cost of bulk chlorine usage during this fiscal year 's budget is now $955 ,000. The cost of the one -year contract (overlaps fiscal years 1984 -85 and 1985 -86) based upon estimated usage of 7,000 tons of bulk chlorine from November 1, 1984 to October 31, 1985 , wi ll be approximately $1,092 ,000 . T h e staff rec ommends award of Spec i fication C-015 to Olympic Chemical Company for their low bid amount of $156 per ton. No . 9(i): Authorizing the Staff to Issue Purchase Order for Remanufacturing of Six Cylinder Heads on the No . 2 Delaval Engine, Specification No. R-016 . The activated sludge facilities at Plant No . 1 , wh i ch were p l aced in service i n 1978 in c lude two l arge 1500 horsepower dual -fuel (natural gas and digester gas) Delaval engines which drive the air blowers for the aeration syste ms . The No. 2 engine currently has i n excess of 30 ,000 hours of operating time and the cylinder heads are now in need of a comp l ete overhaul . This remanufacturing includes cleaning , dimensional inspection , water and gas pressure tests, retrueing of t he bores, repairing leaks, reestabl i shing the combustion face , instal ling new valve seat i n s erts, grinding of valve seats, and reass embly with new valve guides, studs , valves, springs , and keepers. The engine is presently out of service to rebuild the turbo- charger. The staff bel i eves that it would thus be prudent to do the overhauling of the cylinder heads while the engi n e is out of service and is recorr~ending that a purchase order be i ssued to the manufacturer , Transamerica Delaval , Inc . to perfo r m this work . Transamerica has given the Districts a quotation of $4,221 for each cylinder head for a total of $25 ,326 plus applicable sales tax and fre i ght for all six heads . It is esti mated that to purchase new cylinder heads for these engines instead of rebuilding them would cost $16 ,000 -18,000 each. No . 9(j): Authorizing Purchase of Replacement Belts for Belt F i lte r Presses , Specification No . E-157. The Districts currently have fourteen belt filter presses in serv i ce and anticipate installation of n i ne additional belt filter presses with i n the next twelve to eighteen months . In order to keep up with daily sludge production, these units are presently being operated an average of 21 hours per day f i ve days per week . The average belt life i s about 4 ,000 hours . since the start up of the new facilities , replacement belts have periodically been purchased from the original equipment -5 - ' 1 0/1 0/84 manufacturer upon authorization by the Boards. However , because routine belt replacement is a high cost item , last year staff bench-tested fourteen belts of five different manufacturers to determine if any would meet our performance requirements at a lower cost. From this preliminary evaluation , the Boards author i zed staff to purchase belts of three different manufacturers for s h ort -term testing. The focus has been to make the dewatering process more cost-effective by purchasing belts that may last as l o ng or l onger than our presen t ones , bu t may also allow highe r h ydraulic throughput, produce a dr i e r cake and use l ess polymer . The testing has now been completed . National Filter Media 's belt had the best overall performance at a cost anticipated t o be 25% l ess than the Districts are current l y paying . The new belt fabric selected shows promise for in c reased capacity of the dewatering units, slightly drier cake sol i ds and s lightly less polymer u seage . However , we need to now perform l ong -term testing under full sca l e operating cond i tions to determine the life of these be l ts compared to our current belts . The staff is recommending that the General Manager be authorized to negot i ate with Nationa l Filter Media Corporation for ten sets of replacement belts for full scale testing and that the General Manager be authorized to issue a pur c h a se order for an amoun t not to exceed $40 ,000 plus tax and freight. Upon comp l etion of th i s long -term t est (approx i mately six months) we should be able to rea l ize con si derable cost savings as we will be able to competitively bid future belt purchases . No . 9(k): Receive, File and Deny Claim for Damage to Vehicle . The Districts have received a claim from Donald D . St . John of Westminste r for damages to his vehicle alleging a rock fell from a District sludge hauling truck and broke the car 's windshield . The routi n e action appearing on the agenda is to deny the claim and refer it to the Di stricts ' L i ab i lity Claims Admin i s tr ator for appropr iate action . No. 9 (1): Autho r i zing Issuan c e of Purchase Order Contrac t to I n t ernational T echnology Group , Incorporated CITG) for Accounting Computer System Maintenance Agreement . At the Aug u st 8 , 1984 meeting the Board author i zed the purchase of ITG /Integrity Computer System hardware to upgrade our accounting system mini-computer . We have asked ITG to submit a p r oposal to prov i de monthly umbrella technical support services for a one year period including first -call responsibility fo r all problem determinat i ons , remote system monitoring , analysis and -6 - 10/10/84 diagnostics, preventive and corrective field maintenance, operating system software maintenance , operating s y stem upgrades and new releases , general support with application software problem determinations and evaluation of system efficiency and performance. I TG proposes to provide these services on a charge per component basis for an amount not to exceed $1,500 .00 per month. This proposal includes services for which we now rely on two separate vendors and includes addit i onal as well as more complex equipment. Staff recommends acceptance of the ITG proposal and requests authorization to issue a purchase order contract for annual maintenance and support services in an amount not to exceed $18,000 ($1 ,5 00 per month). Staff further recommends the cancellation of the current month -to-month agreement wi th Digidyne at the monthly rate of $968.00 plus tax for ha r dware maintenance on the old system. DISTRICT NO. 2 No . 9(m): Initiating Procedures for Annexation No . 60, Townsend Annexation. In September the District received and filed a re~uest from W. C. and Leona Townsend to annex .60 acres of territory located at 243 South Del Giorgio Road in Anaheim . The property i s an existing single family residence that wishes to connect to the sewer system in lieu of septic service. The local sewering agency is the City of Anaheim . All annexation acreage fees and processing ch arges have been pa i d . Staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material authorizing initiation of proceedings for Annexation No . 6 0 . DISTRICT 6 No . 9(n): Receive, File and Deny Claim for Vehicle Damage . The s t aff has received a claim from Robert and Gayle Hoffman of Costa Mesa for alleged damage to their vehicle occurring when they ran over an improperly seated manhole cover . Attached to the claim was a copy of a Costa Mesa Police Report and one estimate of repair of damage in the amount of $164.83 The routine action appearing on your agenda is to deny the c laim and refer it to the Distr icts ' Liability Claims Administrator for appropr i ate action. • -7 - r,_ I \ • . 10/10/84 ' DISTRICT NO . 7 No . 9(o): Authorizing Staff to Negotiate for Construction of the Fairview Subtrunk Connection to the Sunflower Trunk. Enclosed with the agenda material is a separate staff report discussing the need for relocation of a District manhole which lies within the alignment of a City of Santa Ana storm drain construction project currently underway. The report concludes that in stallati on of a desirable connection between the Distr ic ts ' Fairview Subtrunk and Sunflower Interceptor concurrent with the construc tion of th e storm drain would result in greater f l exibil i ty within the District's system and would also minimize public inc onvenience and realize a cost savings by doing it now . The staff r eport recommends that the General Manager be authorized to negotiate with t he storm drain project 's sponsor for the construction of the connection between the Fairview Subtrunk and the Sunflower Interceptor Sewer in a n amount not to exceed $19,200 . No . 9(p): Orderina Annexation No . 96 -Horn Annexation to County Sanitation District No . 7 . This 3 .508 acre annexation is the development of four single family residences at the intersection of La Cuesta Dr i ve , Eas t Lemon Heights Drive, and Foothill Blvd . in the unincorporated territory in the County of Orange . The 7th Sewer Maintenance District will be the local sewering agency . The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreemen t with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties . Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda material ord e ring Annexation No . 96 . ALL DISTRICTS No . 11 and 12: Report of the Executive Committee . The Committee met on September 26th and enclosed for Board members is a written report of their d i scussio n s and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards . DIS TRICT 2 AND 7 No . 24 : Receive, File and Certify Final Environmental Impact Report for Formation of Sanitation District No . 13 . On October 1st a staff report and summary of the Final Environmental Impact Report on the proposed formation of District -8 - l I _... 10/10 /84 No . 13 was mailed to th e Direc tors of Districts No . 2 and 7 . The staff report outlines the comments received on the Draft Environmental Impact Report a nd the responses that are i n cluded i n the F inal Environmental Impact Report prepared by Ul trasysterns , Inc., environmental consultant. Also enclosed in the mail ing was a copy of the Final Environmental Impact Repo rt a nd a copy of propos ed Re solution No . 84-177 making f ind ings and a uthorizing the fi li ng o f a Noti c e of Determination . Th e consultant wil l present a ve r bal r eport to the Directors at Wednesday 's meeting . The act ions appearing o n the agenda are to r eceive and file th e staf f report a nd comments submitted on the Draf t Environmental Imp ac t Report and to rec e i ve , file and c ert ify the Final Env ir onmental Impact Report and app r ove Resolution No . 84 -177 . If any Director ha s a ques tion or wishes a dditional copies o f the Draft Environmental Impact Report, Final Envir on me ntal Impact Report or Res olut i on No . 84 -177 , please call Torn Daw es or Hilary Baker at (714) 540-291 0 . DISTRIC T NO . 2 No . 27 : Ac ti ons Concerni ng &1nexation No . 41, Tract No . 9713 . At the September meeting , the Directo r s fixed October 10 , 1984 at 7:30 p .rn. as the time and place for a publi c hearin g on proposed Annexati o n No . 41 to Distr i ct No . 2 . The publi c h ea ring i s r equired because th e Distri cts do not h ave 100 % consent of the current prope rty owners . Th i s i s due to the fact that this anne x ation is one of those that was caught up in the AB 8 tax exc h ange negotiations with the County . During th i s period , several of the properties c hanged owne rship and the or igin al petit i o n is , therefore, no l onger valid . The hearing process is the most expeditious way to complete this annexation . The annexation is for 2 .49 acres of territory in the vic in ity of San i tago Blvd . and Santi ago Canyon Road in the City of Orange . The City of Oran ge will b e the loc a l sewering agency . The actions appear ing on the agenda are to open the public he ar ing, rece i ve a staff summary of the Local Agency Fo r mation Comm ission and District No . 2 's actions to da t e on the proposed an n e xa t i o n , to hear any writte n or o ral protests , to make a d ete rm inat ion of the sufficiency of the prote s ts and to close the hearing. If it is determined that there i s not a major i ty protest, the recommended fina l action is to approve th e resolution ordering the annexat i on of the 2 .49 acres o f terr i tory in Tract No . 9 713 known as proposed Ann exation No . 41 . The staff r ecommends the agenda act i ons . ... -9-,- • ,. l r . • I· f I ~· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS STAFF SUMMARY REPORT ON RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 FORMATION OF SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 At the regular meeting on August 8, 1984 the Boards of Directors of Districts 2 and 7 conducted a public hearing on the Draft EIR for the formation of County Sanitation District No. 13. A representative of the Districts' consultant, Ultrasystems, Inc., reviewed the Draft EIR which had previously been mailed to the Directors with a staff sununary. Following the close of the hearing the Board fixed the period for conunents on the Draft document and directed staff and consultant to prepare the Final EIR after the close of the comment period. · The purpose of the EIR is to assess unavoidable adverse impacts · (those impacts which continue to be of significance even when all .known, identified and feasible mitigation measures are applied> The document states that since the proposed action will only impact the administration of sewage treatment and collection in the area, no unavoidable adverse impacts will result. Since the hearing, the Districts have received the following comments on the Draft EIR which are summarized along with the environmental consultant's responses: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region The issues raised by the Regional Water Quality Control Board pertain to the potential water quality impacts of future developments which would be accommodated by the formation of County Sanitation District No. 13, and request that the EIR address types and amounts of waste materials projected to be served by the District, proposed waste treatment and disposal methods, the impact of projected waste volume on capacity of existing and proposed treatment disposal facilities, potential impacts on water quality (ocean surface and groundwaters> of ~ projected waste generation treatment and disposal. J " ·" The Final EIR states that the wastewater will originate from residential and commercial developments, and will be consistent with what the Districts are currently treating; that the majority of the wastewater will flow to Plant No. 1 and will receive full secondary treatment with only a small portion going to Plant No. 2 where the Districts currently have 75 MGD of secondary treatment; that the area included in proposed District No. 13 was previously included in the Master Plan Service Areas for Districts No. 2 and 7 and, therefore, the current Master Plan for the treatment plants has considered the future development of the area; and that the Districts will comply with the Regional Board's NPDES permit requirements. The Regional Board's comments also included a statement that the cumulative ultimate flows projected by the formation of District 13, plus the other three Master Plan EIR's which have recently been reviewed, should be acknowledged. The cumulative proposals are being considered in the Joint Works Master Plan EIR which is currently being prepared and should be available for public review in January. Sea and Sage Chapter,· National Audubon society This comment points out.that within the area of proposed District 13 is a critical habitat for the Golden Eagle, a species of special concern to the California State Department of Fish & Game, as well as the San Dieqo Coast Horned Lizard, and the Sage Sparrow, the Black-chinned Sparrow, Mountain Quail and Blue-Grey \.,.) Gnatcatcher. It requests that the Final EIR include impacts of the formation of proposed District No. 13 on the critical habitat for these species. The Final EIR indicates that the formation of. District 13 does not include construction of new facilities, therefore, the formation itself will not have impacts on the critical habitat for the species listed. The areas have always· been included within the proposed Master Plan Service Area for Districts No. 2 and 7 and the formation is for financial purposes only. It suggests that the comments by the Sea and Sage Chapter of the National Audubon Society should be considered by local jurisdictions within District No. 13 in the development of their respective land use plans. Orange County Foothills Subcommittee, Sierra Club-Angeles Chapter Conservation Committee The substance of this comment is that within the boundaries of proposed District No. 13 is an area of outstanding biological, scenic, and historic resources, as well as some limited passive , recreational potential. Included within the boundaries is a rare Tecate Cypress forest covering several hundred acres, and the world's largest Tecate Cypress tree may be found in the bottom of Coal Canyon. There are also two additional plant -2- species which meet the California Department of Fish & Game's criteria for rare and/or endangered species: the Heart-leaved Pitcher Sage CLepechinia cardiophylla), and Braunton's Rattleweed Castragalus brauntonii). This comment also mentions the two active Golden Eagle nests less than a mile from the District's borders. The response to comments incorporates these comments in the Final EIR and refers the writer back to the response to the Audubon Society's comments. Secondly, the writer states that the land use plan included within the EIR depicts residental development through the area of greatest Tecate Cypress density and that they have recommended to the County of Orange that the best designation for the land is high priority open space. The ultimate land use plan was not proposed by the Districts' consultants, but rather developed using the land use plans of the different public jurisdictions within District 13. The consultant incorporated the land use maps of those agencies into one ·master land use map .shown in the Draft.EIR. The Districts concur that development of some of the area could have significant impacts· on plant and animal species and encourage the public agencies within the boundaries to consider such potential impacts in their respective land use plans. T~e comment regarding the designation of land as high priority open space is noted. Thirdly, the writer states that the list of environmental documents included within the Draft EIR is deficient a~d lis.ts three other EIR documents that should· be referenced·. 'The list of references include environmental documents relative to the project and the referenced documents in the comments are included in References Section 11.0 of the Draft EIR. Lastly, the conunentor suggests two alternatives to the project due to the sensitive biological resources of the Coal Canyon Tecate Cypress area: The first alternative is to eliminate the Coal Canyon Tecate Cypress area from the proposed District; and the second is to include any impacts to the area in the Final EIR. The elimination of the area from Sanitation District 13 as suggested in Alternative 1 would not reduce potential biological impacts since the local jurisdictional land use plans will be the same whether or not the area is served by District 13. Regarding Alternative 2, the formation is for financial purposes and does not propose land uses, therefore, there will not be r· , impacts to this area based strictly on the formation of District 13. -3- J The Irvine Company The Irvine Company requests that the EIR note that they have V remaining lands within the City of Orange sphere of influence which drain toward the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County sewer system and that in the future it may be determined that this area or portions thereof should be annexed to District 13. The comment goes on to state that completion of master planning studies are required to determine the best means of sewer service. The Districts' Final EIR notes this conunent. Mr. c. Eugene Jones, Professor of Botany, CSUF Mr. Jones expresses concern over a statement within the document that no known endangered species occur within the proposed District 13. He states that while no rare or endangered plant species are listed for this area in the Federal listing, three plants are listed as rare in California on the CNPS Rare Plant List of 1984. The comment goes on to state that since all three occur within the proposed boundaries of the-District, and since-all would experience significant impacts if ~nd when the ultimate -land use plan for the District is implemented, they . would urge that potential impacts to these plants be considered in the Final EIR. The Districts' response again points out that the formation of ~ District 13 will not directly result in development, that the development will depend.upon the land use plans as designated by the respective public agencies. Each jurisdiction will be responsible for determining whether or not their land use plans result in any impacts to rare plants. Orange County Water District The conunent points discrepancies in the Draft EIR concerning ultimate flow from the District. The Districts' response to comment makes the apppropriate corrections. State of California, Office of Planning and Research Remarks from the Off ice of Planning and Research were advisory in nature pointing out that comments received from interested parties on the Draft EIR during the review period had to be addressed, that the certified EIR had to be considered in the decision making process for the project. The letter further states thatt , the lead agency (Districts No. 2 and 7) must make written findings for each significant effect and must support its actions with a written statement of overriding considerations for each unmitigated significant effect. \...) -4- These items have been addressed in the enclosed Resolution No. 84-177, a Resolution of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 2 and 7, certifying Final Environmental Impact Report for Formation of County Sanitation District No. 13, making certain findings in connection therewith, and adopting a statement of overriding considerations which has been prepared in accordance with current CEQA Guidelines. California Department of Fish and Game Fish & Game commented that the formation of District 13 will not have significant effects of its own and that they will, therefore, rely on the environmental analysis required of those lead agencies proposing projects to be served by Sanitation District No. 13 to determine potential adverse effects to fish and wildlife resources in the area. Comments so noted. Cities of Brea, Irvine and Santa Ana and County of Orange EMA These agencies responded that they had no comment relative to the formation. The responses were so noted. Basically, the formation ·of District No. 13 is to resolve the means of financing sewerage services to the area that is otherwise ·tributary to Districts No. 2 and 7, thus, no additional sewerage facilities will be built that would not have otherwise been constructed by Districts No. 2 and 7. Therefore, there are no environmental impacts that will be caused by virtue of the formation of District No. 13. The Draft EIR, which together with the response to connnents included herewith, comprises the Final EIR, outlines the financial program to be implemented within the District, including collection of a one-time connection fee from each property owner on a per unit basis to pay for sewerage facilities, as well as the collection of a yearly service fee from each user to pay for annual operating and maintenance costs. The report explains that the capacity in the collection and treatment facilities necessary to service District No. 13 is included in the Master Plan of Sewers for Districts No. 2 and 7, and would be provided regardless of the formation of a new District, stating that "if no new District were formed, an identical infrastructure would be provided by Districts No. 2 and 7 in accordance with the Master Plan of Sewers". The report goes on to state that new development will occur in the area regardless of formation of the new District and that r , in the event the new District was not formed, the area would be annexed to Districts No. 2 and 7 and special service agreements would be required or fee zones formed to insure they would pay their fair share of collection and treatment costs. The formation of the District provides a convenient and efficient method of providing the Districts a means to recover collection and treatment costs. -s- J. ... The Environmental Impact Report does outline several alternatives to the proposed action. These include: A. No project, or postponement, which would prevent the formation of a new sanitation district. The existing developments would remain in District No. 2 or 7 and new developments would annex thereto and pay connection and service fees to those Districts. The physical impacts of this alternative would be no different than the proposed project. B. Formation of a sanitation district independent of the Orange County Sanitation Districts. This alternative c. would result in an independent sanitation district that would be unable to share in the Districts' collection and treatment facilities, thereby necessitating the construction of trunk sewer lines and treatment facilities in the project area. It is anticipated that impacts from this alternative would be of greater magnitude and severity than those assoicated with the formation of District No. 13. Treatment of sewage by utilization of septic tank systems. This would require soil testing for· percolation capabilities and the Report pointed out that large scale use of septic tanks can have detrimental effects on groundwater quality.· Further, they may not be allowed by the County Health Department • D. To annex the entire area now outside the Sanitation. Districts to District No. 2 or District No. 7. Areas presently within Districts No. 2 and 7 that are proposed for detachment and inclusion in District No. 13 would remain in their present Distr.ict. Fee zones or service agreements would have to be established for the newly· annexed areas and the areas proposed for detachment to recover capital and operating costs. The physical impacts would be no different than the proposed project. The conunents and responses are more fully detailed in the enclosed Final EIR and Resolution No. 84-177. Consideration of approval of the Final EIR will be placed on the Boards' agenda for the regular October 10, 1984 meeting. IF ANY DIRECTOR HAS A QUESTION PLEASE CALL TOM DAWES OR HILARY BAKER (714) 540-2910 -6- r RESOLUTION NO. 84-177 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANTITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2 AND 7, CERTIFYING FINAL FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT "FORMATION OF SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 11 , AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. ******************** WHEREAS, on July 11, 1984 the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7 of Orange County, California, adopted County Sanitation District No. 13 Formation Report (the Project), and WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7 (hereinafter 11 DISTRICTS 11 ) are the lead agency for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for projects contained within said Formation Report as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, (hereinafter "CEQA") and the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act as modified and adopted by the DISTRICTS (hereinafter 11 CEQA Guidelines 11 ); and WHEREAS, in order to facilitate an objective assessment of the individual and collective environmental impacts associated with the formation of County Sanitation District No. 13, the DISTRICTS have caused to be prepared, a Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report "Formation of Sanitation District No. 13 11 to address the significant, adverse environmental impacts, mitigation measures and project alternatives associated with the Project; and WHEREAS, the DISTRICTS have consulted with other public agencies, and the general public and given them an opportunity to comnent on said Draft EIR as required by the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 1984, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Boards of Directors of the DISTRICTS to provide a further opportunity for the general public to comnent on and respond to the Draft EIR at which time no person other than the DISTRICTS' consultant spoke; and WHEREAS, the DISTRICTS have evaluated the comments received from public agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft EIR;. and WHEREAS, said comments and recormnendations received on the Draft EIR, either verbatim or .in summary and the responses of the .DISTRICTS to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation· process have been included in and-made part of said Draft EIR to form the Final EIR for said Project as required by Section 15132 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, said Final EIR has been presented to the members of the Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS for review and consideration prior to the final approval of, and corrmitment to, the formation of District No. 13. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7 of Orange County, California as follows: -2- Section 1. \..,,,) That the Boards of Directors of said DISTRICTS do hereby certify that the Final Focused Environmental Impact Report, "Formation of Sanitation District No. 13 11 has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and that the DISTRICTS have reviewed and considered the information contained in said Final EIR prior to approval of, or commitment to, the Project. Said Final EIR is composed of the following elements: A. Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report "Formation of Sanitation District No. 13" and all appendices thereto; B. Comments and responses to comments on said Draft EIR; Section 2. That the Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS do hereby find that there are no significant environmental effects or unavoidable adverse impacts resulting from the proposed fo~mation of County Sanitation District No. 13 and that the proposed action is of a financial nature and will only impact the administration of sewage treatment and collection in the area. Comments received on the Draft Focused EIR have been considered and do not constitute significant environmental effects or unavoidable adverse impacts of the project. Section 3. That the Secretary be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to file a copy of this resolution and of the aforesaid Final Focused Environmental Impact Report at the Districts' office to be available for public inspection and copying; and -3- Section 4. That the Secretary be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD OCTOBER 10, 1984 -4- - - - .... - - - - - #4116 - - - - FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FORMATION OF SANITATION DISTRICT No. 13 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Prepared for: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Prepared By : ULTRASYSTEMS , INC . 16845 Von Karman Avenue Irvine, California 92714 (714) 863-7000 SEPTEMBER 1984 ! ·e . . • It. • -. . - TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................... 1 2.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS.............................. 2 A. Mr. Gordon Anderson, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region.......... 2 B. Ms. Donna Mackiewicz, Conservation Chairperson, Sea and Sage, National Audubon Society........... 4 C. Mr. Kenneth S. Croker, Orange County Foothills Subcoamittee Sierra Club, Angeles Chapter Conservation Committee........................... 6 D. Mr. Saturo Tamaribuchi, Manager, Water and Wastewater System, The Irvine Company ••• "......... 9 E. Dr. C. Eugene Jones, Professor of Botany, CSUF, 1st Vice President of Southern California Botantists and CNPS, Orange County Chapter....... 10 F. Mr. Nereus·L. Richardson, Assistant Manager/District Engineer, Orange County Water District ••••••••••• 11 G. Mr. Ed Moore, Senior Planner, City of Irvine 12 H. Mr. John B. Chanian, Chief Deputy Director, Office of Planning and Research ••.•.••••••••••••• 13 I. Mr. Jack C. Parnell, Director, California Department of Fish and Game •..••••••••••••••••••• 14 J. Mr. Alex G. Ghobadi, County of Orange Environmental Management Agency •••••••••••••••••• 15 K. Mr. William R. Kelly, Director of Development Services, City of Brea .•••••••••••••• 16 L. Mr. C. Stephen Bucknam, Jr., Senior Civil Engineer Water Engineering, City of Santa Ana .••• 17 APPENDICES Appendix A -Comment Letters i r I .. e·. . . ... . . ... 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Response to Connnents document provides responses to the comments that were received in regards to the proposed Formation of Sanitation District No. 13. This document in conjunction with the Draft EIR comprises the Final EIR. This Final EIR has been prepared at the direction of the Board of Directors of Districts 2 and 7 for a total contract amount of $8,174 • 1 . e 2.0 Comment: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS A. Conunents from Mr. Gordon Anderson California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region . •,. Our letter of 16 September 1983 identified a number of concerns regarding this project. The most important of these related to the project's effects on water quality. We note that the Orange County Water District a 1 so sub- mitted conments on that subject. While there is the clear potential for this project to have beneficial water quality impacts, these matters should nonetheless have warranted some discussion in this document. Letter from California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region dated September 16, 1983, referenced to above Comment: The Environmental Impacts discussion in the Initial Study recognizes that the project will exert an indirect impact by accommodating future growth within the proposed District boundaries. The concerns of this Board pertain to the potential water quality impacts of this future development. In response to these concerns, the DEIR should address the following: · -Types and amounts of waste materials projected to be served by the new districts -Proposed waste treatment and disposal methods -Impact of projected waste volume on capacity of existing and proposed treatment and disposal facilities -Potential impacts on water quality (ocean, surface and groundwaters) of projected waste generation, treatment, disposal We have received two additional Notices of Preparation for projects (Districts 2, 3, and 11 Sewage Collection System Master Plan; Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for District No. 1, the Northern Half of District No. 6, and District No. 7) under your jurisdiction. As in the present proposal, each of these projects would acconuno- date future development in its respective area. The DEIR should assess the potential impacts on water quality and on sewage treatment facilities of the cumulative ultimate flows projected by these combined proposals. 2 L L L L L j I I I w ' l.J I L..i i l.I .. e . . . . ... • • Response: .. The type of waste materials expected to be generated within District No. 13 will include residential and commercial {urban) sewage. The sewage flow from the District is estimated to be 11.04 million gallons per day based on the ultimate land use plans of the jurisdictions located within the District. The majority of the wastewater wi 11 fl ow to Pl ant #1 and will receive full secondary treatment. A portion of the wastewater will flow to Plant # 2 where 75 MGD of the flow receives secondary treatment. Following treatment, the effluent will be pumped into the ocean through a five mile outfall. The solids residue is disposed of at the Coyote Canyon Landfill in accordance with State, County and Regional Water Quality Control Board standards. The area included in proposed District 13 has been included in the proposed master plan service area for Districts 2 and 7 and properties annexed into Districts 2 and 7 subse- quent to June 7, 1978. The current. master pl an for the treatment plants has taken into account the future develop- ment of the area within District 13.· The wastewater generated from the area will be consistent with quality throughout. the Districts. The sewage generated from District 13 has been planned and the treatment and disposal of the wastewater will be in accordance with the Districts present procedures that comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board ·standards under their existing permit (Permit no. CA 0110604). The wastewater generated by the cumulative proposals is being considered in the Districts Joint Works Master Plan which evaluates facilities requirements for a 20· year period. An EIR is currently being prepared for that document which will be available for public review in December or January. The Districts have planned adequate treatment facilities to accommodate increased cumulative sewage • 3 e . . B. Comments From Donna Mackiewicz, Conservation Chairperson Sea and Sage Chapter, National Audubon Society Comment: Within proposed District 13 is critical habitat for the Golden Eagle, a Species of Special Concern to the Cali- fornia State Department of Fish and Game. Only a few golden eagle locations remain in Orange County. Two Golden Eagle nest sites are found quite close to the borders of proposed Sanitation District 13: the Fremont Canyon pair, and a pair to the east of Coal Canyon, scar- cely 200 yards from the proposed district. The eastern pair is not shown in Forest Service documents, but may be confirmed by contacting Richard Friesen, Depart- ment of Manmology, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, 900 Exposition Boulevard, LA 90007. Coal Canyon, the ridge between Coal and Gypsum Canyons, and portions of Gypsum Canyon are part of the critical foraging area· for at least one, possibly two pairs of Golden Eagles. Two golden eagle perch areas have been identified in the west branch of Coal Canyon (Karling G. Marsh, memorandum to Orange County EMA, Sept. 3, 1982). Residential development on the floor of Coal Canyon as depicted in the Ultimate Land Use Plan map on page 13, would severely impact the Golden Eagles. Observers have seen the San Diego Coast Horned Lizard, also a state Species of Special Concern, both on the Coal-Gypsum ridgeline and on the east side of Gypsum Canyon. Resi- dential development depicted on the Ultimate Land Use Plan map in this area would severely impact the San Diego Coast Horned Lizard.· On the east side of Gypsum Canyon is the only recorded nesting area in Orange County for the Sage Sparrow, accord- ing to Douglas Willick, who can be reached at home at {714) 535-0167. Other species of concern to our society found in Coal Canyon and environs are the Black-chinned Sparrow, Mountain Quail and Blue-Grey Gnatcatcher. The final EIR should include impacts of proposed Sanitation District 13 on critical habitat for Golden Eagles, Coast Horned Lizard and Sage Sparrow. Response: Since the formation of Sanitation District No. 13 does not include construction of new facilities, the formation itself will not have any impacts on critical habitat for Golden Eagles, Coast Horned Lizard and Sage Sparrow. District 13 is comprised of areas within the proposed 4 L i 1., L I l. -- L 1 L.i L I ..... L L L L w ·e . . . . -. . - - - - \ Master Plan service area for Districts 2 and 7 and property that has been annexed to Districts 2 and 7 subsequent to June 7, 1978 that should more logically be located in District 13. The formation of District 13 is only for financial purposes and includes areas that were proposed for inclusion in Districts 2 and 7. The ultimate land uses for development within District 13 are based upon each jurisdictional agencies land use plans for the area. The formation of Sanitation District 13 does not propose land uses, therefore, the project will not have any impacts on fauna habitat. The comment by Donna Mackiewicz regarding the potential impact to critical habitat for Golden Eagles, Coast Horned Lizard and Sage Sparrow should be considered by each jurisdiction. in the development of their respective land use plans. 5 Comment: C. Conment from Kenneth S. Croker, Chair Orange County Foothills Subcommittee Sierra Club Angeles Chapter Conservation Committee Within proposed Sanitation District No. 13 is an area of outstanding biologic, scenic and historic resources, as well as some limited passive recreational potential. This area is comprised of Coal Canyon, portions of the Mindeman Ranch, the Goal-Gypsum divide and portions of the east side of Gypsum Canyon, as well as its southeast quarter. It will hereafter be referred to as the Coal Canyon-Tecate Cypress area. BIOLOGICAL {p. 18). Within proposed Sanitation District No. 13 is a rare Tecate Cypress forest that covers several hundred acres. We believe the world's largest Tecate Cypress tree is found in the bottom of Coal Canyon. It is over thirty-five feet in height and in breadth. It has a base circumference of eight feet. It has been cored and found to be. over 150 years of age. Associated with the Tecate Cypress are two plant species which meet the Cali- fornia Department of Fish and Game's criteria for rare and/or endangered species: the Heart-leaved Pitcher Sage (Lepechinia cardiophylla) and Braunton's Rattleweed (Astra- galus brauntonii) (Contact Rick York, California Natural Diversity Data Base, phone 916-322-2493). Braunton's Rattleweed is under review for endangered species listing by the United States government {Category 2, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). The Coal Canyon-Tecate cypress area of the proposed Dis- trict No. 13 is flanked by two active Golden Eagles' nests less than a mile from the proposed district's borders. The Golden Eagle is a species of Special Concern to the Cali- fornia State Department of Fish and Game. Another species of Special Concern· found in the area is the San Diego Coast Horned Lizard, also under study by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. SCENIC, HISTORIC, RECREATIONAL. Soaring cliffs, the ridgeline Tecate Cypress, a 30-foot waterfall, ancient oak trees, a sculptured sandstone grotto and waterfall are among the outstanding scenic resources of the area. The Confidence Coal Mine structures (1876), foundations of a settler's cabin, an old water tank, the one Tecate Cypress previously mentioned, and numerous undated struc- tures are among the historic resources. 6 I ~ L L I I '-' I I ; ~ L I ~ I I ... ' I ~ L i ~ L I I- I ~ ·e . . ~ . . ..., . . - ... Response: The Orange County Master Plan of Hiking and Riding Trails includes an access trail to the Cleveland National Forest which may not conflict with biological values. Potential for naturalist interpretation of unique resources exists. ULTIMATE LAND-USE PLAN (p. 13). The Lowry Ultimate Land Use Plan depicts residential development through the area of greatest Tecate Cypress density. We find this inappro- priate. In addition to destruction of the cypress forest, fuel breaks required for such development would severely impact rare and/or endangered species. We have previously recommended to the County of Orange that the best designation for this land is High Priority Open Space, and we look forward to its being so categorized in the future. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS ( p. 34). The ULTRASYSTEMS, INC. list of environmental· documents is deficient. The list should include EIR 109 and its Appendix, prepared in 1978 for the EPIC Group, Inc., Coal Canyon Shooting Sports Draft EIR 499 prepared in 1982, and the supplemental biological assessment update {August 6, 1982). Also include 11 Co1TD11ents and Responses to Comments Received on· Draft EIR ·408 Coal Canyon Shooting Sports Center.11 The above documents are on file with the. Environmental Analysis Division, Orange County Environmental Management Agency. Due to ·the sensitive biological resources of the Coal Canyon-Tecate Cypress area, including rare and/or endan- gered species, either of two alternatives should be follo- wed: A 1 ternati ve 1: Eliminate the Coa 1 Canyon-Tecate Cypress area from proposed Sanitation District No. 13. Alternative 2: Include any impacts to the Coal-Canyon- Tecate Cypress area in the final EIR. The connnents are hereby noted and wi 11 be made a part of the Final EIR. Refer to the Response to Donna Mackiewicz (Section B) of the National Audubon Society for a response regarding Biological. The Ultimate Land Use Plan shown on page 13 of the DEIR was not proposed by the District's consultants, but rather developed using the land use plans of the different public jurisdictions within Sanitation District 13. The Dis- trict's consultants incorporated the land use maps of these agencies into one master 1 and use map which is shown on page 13. We concur that deve 1 opment of some of the area within proposed District 13 could have significant impacts on some plant and animal species • 7 e • . We encourage the public agencies within District 13 to consider the potential impact of their respective land use plans on plant and animal species. The comment regarding the designation of land in District 13 as High Priority Open Space is noted. The list of references in the DEIR is not deficient. The list of references in the ~nvironmental document is rela- tive to the project. The referenced environmental document in the connnent should be included as an environmental documents in the References Section 11.0 of the DEIR. The elimination of the Coal Canyon-Tecate Cypress area from Sanitation District 13 as suggested in Alternative 1 will not reduce potential biological impacts to this area. The local jurisdictional land use plan for this area will still be the same whether or not the Coal Canyon-Tecate Cypress area remains in District 13. In response to the conunent regarding . Al terriative 2, the fonnation of District 13 will not result in any impacts to the Coal .Canyon-Tecate Cypress area. Because the formation of the District is for fi nanci a 1 purposes and does not propose 1 and uses, there wi 11 not be any impacts to this area by the formation of District 13. 8 I I ~ L L i l.i i I QmJ I L I ~ I L.t I ... L I i..i Comment: Response: - ... D. Conunent from Saturo Tamaribuchi, Manager Water and Wastewater Systems, The Irvine Company We would 1 ike to request the EIR note that our remaining lands within the City of Orange sphere of influence drain towards the County Sanitation District of Orange County sewer system and that in the future it may be detennined that this area or portions of it should be annexed to Sanitation District No. 13. Part of these lands are within the Irvine Ranch Water District service area (potentially County Sanitation District No. 14) and the remainder is in the Santiago County Water District service area. Comple- tion of master planning studies and clearer assessment of future development are required to determine the best means of sewer service. The conunent is noted and the information is hereby included in the Final EIR. 9 e . . E. Conunents from Mr. C. Eugene Jones Professor of Botany, CSUF 1st Vice President of Southern California Botantists and CNPS Orange County Chapter Comment: We are particularly concerned about the statement on page 18 that no known endangered species occur within the proposed District No. 13. Although it is correct that no rare or endangered species are listed for this area in the Federal listing, three plants, all of which occur in the proposed district, including Braunton's milkvetch, Astra- ..9!1!!! brauntonii, Parish, Heart-leaved pitcher-sage, repechinia guadalupensis Wats. ssp. forbessi (Jeps.) Beauchamp, are listed as rare plants in California on the CNPS Rare Plant List of 1984. This list, which utilizes the state criteria for determining rare and endangered species, cites the first two of these three species as rare and endangered species and the Tecate cypress as rare in California. One Tecate cypress in this area has an esti- mated age of 150 years and a height of 30 feet., This very old. and large specimen may be destroyed by the proposed development. Since all three plants occur within the proposed Sanitation District No. 13 and since all three would experience significant impacts if and when the ultimate land use plan for this district is implemented, we strongly urge that potential impacts to these three plants be considered in the final EIR. All three plants are part of a diminishing habitat in California, the Tecate cypress ecosystem. What will the effects of development within this proposed Sanitation District No. 13 be on this endangered habitat? Respons~: The existence of all three plant species is hereby noted and made a part of the Final EIR. The formation of Sani- tation District No. 13 will not directly result in devel- opment. Development within this ·District will depend upon the land use plans as designated by the respective public agencies as shown in the ultimate land use map in the DEIR. Whether or not any rare plants are impacted will depend upon the land use plans of the jurisdiction where the plants are located and if the plans propose development or open space. Each jurisdiction will be responsible for detennining whether or not their land use plans will result in any impacts to rare plants. District 13 will not result in any impacts to plant species. 10 L L I I I.I L i .· I.I I ..... I ; ~ 1. \-1 I i I llllil ·e·. . . -. . Comment: - - Response: - - - F. Conment from Mr. Nereus L. Richardson, Assistant Manager/District Engineer, Orange County Water District There is confusion as to the amount of sewage that the proposed District 13 will generate. On page 11 it is stated that the district will ultimately generate 11.04 MGD of sewage, but on page 20 it is estimated that 6 .14 MGD will occur. Also, on page 19 it is stated that the Dis- trict will ultimately consume 6.35 MGD of water which does not seem to be consistent with the 6.14 MGD of wastewater. The report does not mention which sewage plant, Plant 1 or Plant 2, will receive the flow from the new District. As stated in our previous correspondence, the District is concerned about new sewage flows as related to quality because of the wastewater reclamation program. District 13 will ultimately generate 11.04 MGD of sewage as stated on page 11 of the DEIR. The 6.14 MGD of sewage as . stated on page 20 iS incorrect and should be 11.04 MGD. The · estimated water consumption of 6. 35 · MGD as stated on page 19 is incorrect and should be 11.04 MGD. Both sewage treatment p 1 ants wi 11 receive sewage fl ow from proposed District 13. Treatment Plant #1 will receive approx,imate ly 10. 33 MGD and Treatment Pl ant #2 wi 11 receive • 71 MGD. ,.,. .. a ·~ '--·?5/_) Comment: G. Comment from Mr. Ed Moore, Senior Planner, City of Irvine The City of Irvine has no comments to offer at this time regarding the draft EIR. Please continue to keep us informed of projects which could potentially impact the City. Response: The comment is noted. 12 I . '- I Lm - I i i-1 I L. I I &.I ~ i I I ... I !. i '-I I ,_ I '91 I !ml -- ! l.J -e·. . . -. . Conment: - Response: - H. Comment from Mr. John B. Chanian, Chief Deputy Director, Office of Planning and Research The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to selected state agen- cies for review.. The review period is closed and the comments of the individual agency(ies) is(are) attached. If you would like to discuss their concerns and recorrmend- ations, please contact the staff from the appropriate agency{ ies). When preparing the final EIR, you must include all conunents and responses {CEQA Guidelines, Section 15132). The certified EIR must be consisdered in the decision-making process for the project. In addition, we urge you to respond directly to the conunenting agency(ies) by writing to them, including the State Clearinghouse number on all correspondence • .Yn the event that. the· project is approved without adequate mitigation of· significant effects, the lead agency must. make written findfogs for each .significant effect and it must supp·ort its actions with a written statement of· overriding considerations for each unmitigated significant effect {CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 and 15093}. · If the project r~qu ires di scret i ona ry appr6va 1 from any state agency, the Notice of Determination must be fi 1 ed· with the Secretary for Resources, as well as with the County Clerk. Please contact Christine Goggin at {916) 445-0613 if you have any questions about the environmental review process. This is a typical comment received from OPR. All comments and responses wi 11 be prepared according to CEQA Gui de- 1 ines, Section 15132. There were no significant effects identified that could not be mitigated, therefore, no overriding considerations will be written. The project Notice of Determination will be filed with the Secretary for Resources and the County Clerk. 13 e . . Comment: Response: I. Comment from Mr. Jack C. Parnell, Director, Department of Fish and Game. The proposed project is the formation of Sanitation Dis- trict Number 13 in Orange County. This District will service other projects to be generally and individually described and approved by City and County governments and will not have significant adverse fish and wildlife effects of its own. The Department of Fish and Game will rely on the environ- mental analysis CEQA requires from each lead agency to determine potent i a 1 adverse effects to fish and wi 1 dl i fe resources from those other projects. Therefore, the document described in SCH NO. 83090702 should not be used as a reference document regarding the effects of such other projects on fish and wildlife resources. The comm~nt is correct that the project wi 11 not have significant fish and wildlife effects· on its own and that this envi.ronmental document should not serve as a reference for fish· and wildlife impacts regarding development of property within District 13. Each lead agency within District 13 will determine the potential biological impacts associated with development of land within their juris- diction. 14 I '-' -- I L I I I I , L-.i i ~ I l-' ·e·· . . !mt . . .. Comment: Response: J. Conanent from Mr. Alex G. Ghobadi, County of Orange Environmental Management Agency The Environmental Management Agency does not have any comments with respect to the Draft Environmental Report for the proposed project. We request that three (3) copies of the final EIR be sent to us when it is available. The comment is noted and three copies of the final EIR.will be sent as requested • 15 e . . K. Comment from Mr. William R. Kelly, Director of Development Services, City of Brea Comment: The City of Brea has completed its review of the above referenced DEIR. We have no comments to make at this time. We understand the purpose of the formation of the district and will attempt to be as cooperative as possible in the implementation of this district. Response: The conment is noted. 16 l : w L I . I.. I L. l ~ I t '-' I I I ... I - I I '-' I i I ~ I . &-1 ~e-.. . . -. . - ·- - Comment: Response: L. Comnent from Mr. C. Stephen Bucknam, Jr., Senior Civil Engineer Water Engineering, City of Santa Ana The City of Santa Ana has no conunent regarding the subject formation of County Sanitation District No. 13. Said formation of CSD No. 13 will have no adverse impact to our facilities. The connnent is noted. 17 - J i - I ...i APPENDIX A COMMENT LETTERS STATE OF CALIFORNIA -GEORGE OEUKMEJIAN, Governor C_;LJFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SANTA ANA REGION 61! 1~ INCIANA AVENUB, SUITS 200 Ri.JERSICH!, CAl.IPOANIA 12508 PHONE: (714) 684-93:SO - - August 6, 1984 Ms. Christine Goggin State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814· Dear Ms.. Goggin: Draft Focused EIR: Fonnation· of Sanitation District No. 13, SCH# 83090702 . Our letter of 16 September 1983 identified a number of concerns regarding this project. The most important of these related to the project's effec~s on water quality. We.nQte that the Orange County Water District also submitted conments on that subject. While there fs the clear potential for this project to have beneficial water quality impacts, these matters should nonetheless have warranted some discussion 1 n th 1 s document.· Sincerely, ct~"-~ Gordon K. Anderson Environmental Program Manager cc: Nereus Richardson, Orange County Water District GKA:kyb roJ ~©~ff~~~ \JU AUG-,81984 ~ OfflCE OF P'.ANNlNCi & RESEARCH .. . . . •' STATE OF CALIF\JRNIA-RESOURCES AGENCY CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SANTA ANA REGION 6809 INDIANA AVENUE. SUITI! 200 RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 925045 PHONE: (714» 684-9330 September 16, 1983 Hilary J .. Baker Senior Engineering Aide County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca 92708 RECEIVED SE? 0 !) 1984 ENVIRONMqNTAI. .artlD(~, DIV. NOP: County Sanitation District~ No. 13 Fonnation, SCH #83090702 Dear Ms .. Baker: We have reviewed the Notice of Preparation {NOP) for this project.. We note that the construction of new facilites is not involved in this proposal but, rather, the acquistion of capacity in existing and future facilities. The Environmental Impacts discussion in the Initial Study reconizes that the project will exert an indirect impact by accomodating future growth within the proposed District boundaries. The concerns of this Board per- tain to the potential water quality impacts of this future development. In response to these concerns, the DEIR should address the following: -types and amounts of waste materials projected to be served by the new districts -proposed waste treatment and disposal methods -impact of projected waste volume on capacity of existing and proposed treatment and disposal facilities -potential impacts on water quality {ocean, surface and ground waters) of projected waste generation, treatment 1disposal We have received two additional Notices of Preparation for projects (Districts 2, 3, and 11 Sewage Collection System Master Plan; Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for District No. 1, the Northern Half of Qistrict No. 6, and Distri~t No. 7} under your jurisdiction. As in the present proposal, each-of these proJects would accomodate future development in its resQ.ective area. The DEIR should assess the potential impacts on water quality arid on sewage treatment facilities of the cumulative ultimate flows projected by these combined proposals. We look forward to review of the DEIR when it becomes available. I i.l .. I L \ . I ~ I I I ~ -- \ i.I ' ' '-' -- 1 L - - - Hilary J. Baker -2- If you have any questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, ~£.-St~ Joanne E. Schneider Environmental Specialist cc: Dan Conaty -Office of Planning and Research JES:ww September 16, 1983 - - - - - - - - - - - - SEA and SAGE AUDUBON P. 0. BOX l 771 SANT A ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 11361 Biscayne Hilary J. Baker Senior Engineering Aide County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley 92708 Dear Ms. Baker; Garden Grove, CA 92641 (714) 638-3035 Sept. 9, 1984 The Sea and Sage Audubon Society has reviewed the Draft Focus EIR for proposed Sanitation District 13 and has the following con:ments: Within proposed District 13 is critical habitat for the Golden ERgle, a SpecieG of Special Concern to the California State Departmen~ of Fish and Game. Only a few golden eagle locations remain in Grange County. Two Golden Eagle nest sites are found quite close to the borders of proposed Sanitation District 13: the Fremont Canyon pair, and a pair to the east of Coal Canyon, scarcely 200 yards from the proposed district. The eastern pair is not shown in Forest Service doc- uments, but may be confirmed by contacting Richard Friesen, Department of Mammology, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, 900 Exposition Blvd., LA 9 0007. Coal Canyon, the ridge between Co al and Gypsum CaIIYons, and portions of Gypsum Canyon are part of the critical foraging area for at least one, possibly two pairs of Golden Eagles. Two golden eagle perch areas h ave been identif ied in the west branch of Coal Canyon (Karlin G. ~arsh, memo- randum to Orange County EMA, Sept. 3, 1982). Residential development on the floor of Coal Canyon as depicted in t he Ultimate Land Use P lan map on page 13, would severely impact the ~olden eagles. Observers have seen the San Diego Coast Horned Lizard, also a state Spec i es of Sp ecial Concern, b ot h on t he Coal- Gypsum rig eline and on the east side of Gypsum Canyon. SEA and SAGE AUDUBON -=-I P. 0. BOX 1779 SANTA ANA , CALIFORNIA 9%702 Hilary J. :Baker Sept. 9, 1984 Resident ial deve l opment depicted on the Ultimate Land Use Plan map in this area would severely impact the San Diego Coast Horned Lizard. On the east side of Gypsum Canyon is the only recorded nesting ~rea in Orange County for the Sage Sparrow, according to Douglas Willick, who can be reached at home at \714) 535-0167. Other species of concern to our society found in ·. · .-' Coal Canyon and environs are the Black-chinned Sparrow, Mount ain Quail and Blue-Grey Gnatcatchere The final EIR should include imnacts of nronosed Sanitation District 13 on critical habitat for Golden Eagles, Coast Horned Lizard and Sage Sparrow. Thank you for this opportunity to coT.m ent on th · Draftt Focus EIR for prop oEed Sanitation District 13. ----. Yr;s truly, -'. . ) ff) ,. ' , ~ I · 6-iv'YJ.<1../ o/lta-~£.l:.uV~-C!l -1 cc Ultrasystems Inc. Donna Mackiewicz Conservation Chairperson Sea and Sage Chapter National Audubon Society - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIERRA CLUB -ANGELES CHAPTER 2410 WEST BEVERLY BLVD., LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90057 Ms. Hilary J. Baker $enior Engineering Aide (213) 387-4287 County Sanitation District of Orange County P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Ms. Baker: Local return address: 2783 Mendoza Drive Costa. Mesa, CA 92626 (714) 546-7016 Sept. 8, 1984 The Sierra Club has rerlewed the Dra.tt Focused EIR for proposed Sanitation District No. 13 and ha:s the !allowing comments: Within proposed Sanitation District No. 13 is an area of outstanding biolQgic, scenic and historic resources, as well as sane limited passin recreational potential.. Titis area is comprised ot Coal Canyon, portions of the Mindeman Ranch, the Coal-GypSUll diTide and portions af the east side of Gypsum Canyon, as well a.s its southea3t quarter. A map of this area is enclosed. It will hereafter be referred to ~ th19 Coal Canyon-Tecate Cypress area. BIOLOOICAL (p. 18). Within proposed Sanitation Di.rlrict No. 13 is a rare Tecate Cypress forest that cOTers seTeral hundred acres. We believe the world's largest Tecate 6ypress tree is found in the bottom o~ Coal Canyon• It is over thirty-five feet in height and in breadth. It has a base circumference of eieht feet. It has been cored and found to be over 150 years ·of age. Associated with the Tecate Cypress are two plant species which meet the Crtlifornia DepA.rtment of Fish and Game's criteria for rare and/or endangered species: the Heart- lea.Yed Pitcher Sage (Lepechinia cardiophylla) ... and Braunton 1 s Rat tleweed (Astragalus brauntoniiJ (Contact Rick Yor.k, California Natural Diversity Data Base, Phone 916=J22-2u93). Braunton's Rattleweed is unden review for endangered species listing by the United States goverrnnent (Category 2, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). The Coal Canyon-Tecate cypress area of the proposed District No. 13 is fianked by two active Golden Ea~s' nests less than a mile fran the proposed district's borders. 'Ille Golden Eagle is a species of Special Concern to the California State Department of Fish and Game. Another species of Special Concern found in the area is the San Diego Coast Horned Lizard, also under study oy the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service . SCENIC,H!STORIC, RECREATIONAL. Soaring cliffs, the rideeline Tecate Cypress, a 30-foot waterfall, ancient oak trees, a sculptured sand.stone grotto and waterfall are among the outstanding scenic resources of the area. The Confidence Coal Mine structures (1876), foundations of a settler's cabin, an old water tank, the one Tecate 8¥Press preViously mentioned, and numerous undated structures are among the historic resources. The Orange County Master Plan of Hiking and Riding Trails includes an access trail to the Cleveland National Forest which may not conflict with biological values. Potential for naturalist interpretation of unique resources existso ULTIMATE LAND-USE PLAN (p. 13). The Lowry Ultimate Land Use Plan depicts residential development through the area of greatest Tecate Cypress density. We find this inappropriate. In addition to destruction of the Clf!'ress forest, fuelbreaks required for such development would severely impact rare and/or endangered species. I Ms. Hilary J. Baker (2) September 8, 1984 We haTe previousl.7 recommended to the County ot Orange that the best desiillation tor this land is Hieh Priority Open Space, and we look torward to its being so categorized in the tuture. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS (p. 34). '!be lJLTRASISTEMS, INC. llat ot enTiromental documents is deficient. The list ahoild include EIR 109 and its Appendix, prepared:· in 1978 tor the EPIC Group, Inc., Coal Canyon Shootine Sports Draft EIR 408 prepared in 1982, and the supplemental bioloeical assessment update (AUIUSt 6, 1982). Also include "Comments and Responses to Comments Received on Dratt EIR 408 Coal Canyon Shootine Sports Center." The abOYe documents are on tile with the EnTironmental Analysis Division, Orange Co\lllty Enviromnental Management Agency. Due to the sensitive biolo~cal resources of the Coal Canyon-Tecate ·~OJPress area, including rare and/or endangered species, either of two alternatiTes should be followed: AlternatiTe 1: Eliminate the Coal Ca.nyon-Tecate Cypress area from proposed Sanitation District No. 13· Alternative 2: Include any impacts to the Coal Canyon-Tecate Cypress area in the final Em~ Thank you for the oppo~uDit:r to comment on the Draft Focused EIR tor proposed Sailitation District No. 13. I ours trul.1', i I w L I l : '- I . I I , ! '-' \ i ; \ ~ ~~~L ~ Oranee Count7 Footh1 l la Subconmdt tee ) ! Copies to: ~ Sierra Club, Angeles Chapter ConserYation Committee Kenneth w. Scatter1ood Adnd.nistrati'Y9 Assistant, Local A1e~c7 Formation Commission Phil Martin, Senior Project Manaeer, tml'RASisrEMS, DlC. Orance Count7 Superrisors Wieder, Nestande, Rile7, Stanton, Clark. Joyce Coleman-Mcginn, Chair, Sierra Club, An1eles Chapter ConserTation Committee Michael Swan, LOW'17 and Ass"Oeiatu W. F. (Bill) OlsOD, Chief, ~al Analysis DiTiaion, O.C. E.M.A. John BJers, Oranee County EnTironmental Health I ,_, I I ! ) i Eric Jesain, Special Projects, o. c. E. M. A. 1 , Susan Brown, Acting Chief, Enviromental Planning Branch, ' ·· State of California, Department of Transportation '- Mark Alpers, SCAG __ Ralph C. Pisapia, Field Supervisor, U.S. Dept. ot Interior, Fish and Wildlife Serrice' , Carl Wilcox, Wildlife Biologist. 1 California DeptC) of Fish and Game '-' Maurice H. Gett7, Chief, Resource Protection Division, Calif )Dept. ot Parks & Rec. Wildlife Management, Calif. Dept. of Fish and Game, Long Beach, CA. Jerry Bennett, Advance FlanninK Highwa7 Engineer, O.C.E.M.A.. \. I i I l ' i I 1-i )_ . .;.· .. \ ... ., . • -. l •d . 1a•r.1~·· .• ·I v-rt ·v-.. ... Karlin G. Marsh Biological Consultant September 3, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: Kenneth Smith, Orange County Environmental Management Agency FROM: Karlin G. Marsh, Project Biologist, Coal Canyon Shooting Sports Center REGARDING: Summary of Biological Findings Subsequent to Submission of Coal Canyon Shooting Sports Center Biological Assessment Update Following preparation and submission of the cited report, dated 8-6-82, I have had further opportunity to examine· certain portions of the Coal Canyon Partnership property, and have made new findings of possible pertinence to certain aspects of the Shooting Sports projec~ and associated conditions imposed upon it by your agency ·and the Orange County Fire Department. These findings are summarized in the following paragraphs~ 1. During a visit to the site with Dr. Ted Hanes, Dir.ector, Cal State Fuller~ ton Arboretum and Ron Kammeyer, Kammeyer and Partners, I located four speci~~ mens of Braunton's rattleweed, a rare and endangered plant species. These were growing in a small area of relatively undisturbed lower floodplain a L luvi um· near the c.onf luence of the east and west branches· of Coal Canyon. I had stated in the cited Assessment Update that the single specimen found in 1978 had been eliminated by bank sloughing along ~he creek. This is a correct statement; the grouping now located had not been observed during the 1978 survey, although it might have been overlooked. The Braunton's rattleweed individuals found were flagged for salvage' and, following project approval, will be removed to the Cal State Fullerton Arboretum.· The Tecate cypress stand and peripheral areas were examined to deter- mine habitat suitability for the San Diego coast horned lizard, a federal candidate species for rare or endangered listing. The cypr~ss stand, of course is not in the development area, but its biota could be adversely impacted by cons~ruction of a proposed 300 foot wide peripheral fire break and by equestrian and pedestrian off-trail incursion by users of a public,,_.,..,,. dedication trail area made a condition of project approval. Entomologist Gordon Marsh and I found ample populations of appropriate prey species of ants and sandy substrate needed by horned Lizards1 along the northern edge of the dense cypress area. Located mainly in the east corner of Section 27 (Irvine Company) and the south corner of Section 31, this setting includes the northern margin of the "Rock Outcrop-Cieneba" soil formation on the property and is d~fined by many sandstone outcrops. ' Subsequently, Ron Kammeyer reported to me that he saw around five horned ------------- 1 The only horned lizard species in Orange County is the San Diego coast horned lizard. . Environmental Impact Report Biolog1cal Assessments 30262 Acorn Lane. P. 0. Box 404, Silverado, California 92676 714/649·2027 Coal Canyon -new biological findings Page Two --------------------~---------------- lizards along the roadway in the cypress grove. This is an unusually large number to be active at this time of year; (the normal activity period is usually April and May, during the breeding season.) The August sighting may indicate that a fairly substantial number of the rare reptiles inhabit this upland. 3. On each visit to the property during the field survey, I had observed a golden eagle flying above the west branch of Coal Canyon. Subsequent to submitting the Biological Assessment Update, Gordon Marsh and I hiked along the ridgeline w-est of the drainage and were eventually able to obtain a suitable vantage point of two alternate perch areas atop canyonside rock stacks used by this bird. No nest site was located· despite our careful search. A nest site in known for Fremont Canyon about 1 1/4 miles from the perch sites. This could be a single, possibly unmated offspring from the Fremont pair, or may represent one member of the pair. 4. The "area of greatest cypress density" depicted in Figure 1 of the Update is a simplified version of what is actually a mosaic of cypress groves interspersed with bands of chamise chaparral. An additional dense grove was located after report preparation on the north facing slope of Coal Canyon south of the Claymont mines. S. It was noted on page 8 if the Assessment Update, that a partial ~ore was taken from the larger of the two cypresses on the canyon floor. It was found during this coring that the area beyond the 7 inches of good wood taken was very corky, indicating possible heart rot. The tree should be ~xamined by an arborist if it is the intention of project planners to retain the specimen within the landscape palette4 6. The population of heart-leaved pitcher sage has now been found to extend along the Coal Canyon ridgeline from the vicinity of the Claymont mines to the north Main Divide Road. Numbers of specimens are intermixed with cypress trees along the latter roadway for a distance of about 1/2 mile. The frequency of pitcher sage specimens is the greatest in areas where.cypress trees do not grow densely together. The pitcher sage shrubs grow on the ridgeline and for a short distance down the slope of the west branch of Coal Canyon. Based on new field findings, I revise upward my estimate of the numbers of this species on the property from 200 to well over 1000. This appears to be the largest population known for the specie~. 7. San Diego reedgrass stands are sparingly distributed along the open, partially barren areas of the Coal Canyon west ridge between the Claymont mines and north Main Divide Road. This grass, identified principally as an associate species within the Tecate cypress community, is much rarer in the Santa Ana Mountains than is heart-leaved pitcher sage. During the Assessment Update field inspection, stands were located near the Claymont mines. The latest groupings found extend the local population about 1/2 mile southward. 8. On the west canyon ridgeline are also edaphic growth-limiting areas popu- lated by pygmy specimens of Tecate cypress. A typical individual examined from the locale was 18 -20 years old, 1 foot high and 1/4 inch in diameter. The growth Limiting areas should be of interest to plant ecologists. I I l..i \ I i.i l i L I I !.- j i '-' I, '-' \ l.i l _J~\' "THE IRVINE COMPANY [ '. 550 Newport Center Drive, P.O. Box I -'. 1~()', . Newport Beach, California 92660-0015 - - ·a ·. ' I (714) 720·2000 August 29, 1984 Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Dawes: BEGEiVED SE? l;:: 1984 EifVIRONA-f SNTAL. 4-.s'TUDfE~ DIV. · \~e appreciate the opportunity ·of reviewing the subject EIR. All .of our lands within the City of Anaheim sphere of .infl.unce and portions of our lands with- in the City of Orange sphere of influence are identified as being within the anticipated boundary of Sanitation District No. 13 . ...... We would like to request the EIR note.that our remaining ·lands within the City of Orange sphere of influence drain towards the County Sanitation District of Orange County sewer system and that in the future it may be determined that this area or portions of it should be annexed to Sanitation District No. 13. Part of these lands are within the Irvine Ranch Water District service a.rea (potentially County Sanitation District No. 14) and the remainder is in the Santiago County Water District service area. Completion of master planning studies and a clearer assessm~nt of future.development are required to determine the be~t means of s•1€~.r,~J~e. · . We appreciate your consideration of this comment. Very truly yours, M nager ater and Wastewater Systems cc: Ron Young, IRWD Charlie Cron, SCWD ... ;~~·· ..... ~~:.. ;-,;f: . '. . • • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BOTANISTS Mr. Hilary J. Baker Senior Engineering Aide Rancho Santa Ana Bot an 1c Garden 1500 Nnrt h College Avenue Claremont, CA 91711 September 10, 1984 County Sanitation District of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Baker: I am writing on behalf of the Southern California Botanists and the· California Native Plant Society, Orange Cou.nty Chapter, regarding our concern about the draft environmental impact report for the formation of County Sanitation District No. 13. We are particularly concerned about the statement on page 18 that no known endangered species occur within the proposed District No. 13. Although it is correct that no rare or endangered species are listed for this area ~n the Federal listing, three plants, all of which occur in the proposed district, including Braunton's milkvetch, Astragalus brauntonii, Parish, Heart-leaved pitcher-sage, Lepechinia cardiophylla Epling, and the Tecate cypress, Cupressus quadalupensis Wats. ssp.forbesii (Jeps.) Beauchamp, are listed as rare plants in California on the CNPS Rare Plant P.rogram List of 1984. This list, which utilizes the state criteria for determining rare and endangered species, cites the first two of these three species as rare and endangered species and the Tecate cypress as rare in California. One Tecate cypress in this area has an estimated age of 150 years and a height of 30 feet. This very old and large specimen may be destroyed by the proposed development. Since all three plants occur within .the proposed Sanitation District No. 13 and since all three would experience significant impacts if and when the ultimate land use plan for t~is district is implemented, we strongly urge that potential impacts to these three olants be considered in the final EIR. All three plants are part of a diminishing habitat in California, the Tecate cypress ecosystem. What will the effects of development within this proposed Sanitation District No. 13 be on this endangered habitat? -2- We sincerely appreciate the opportunity given us to review this proposed project and we hope that our concerns regarding these rare plants and plant ecosystem will be addressed in the final report. ff.. cere7y, ~ ~ I -.,.J:..--:. C #0 '' I;;," ... • II .•, i.' ll 'J 1 ... __.-'1 "~( .... -/ c. Eugen9 Jonr~' Ph.D. Professor of Botany, CSUF 1st Vice President of Southern California Botantists & CNPS, Orange Co. Chapter CEJ:mm I I i \ : '-' I ~ i ' I a.I I ·' ! 1 .., I I Ml I I 'mi \ I ' \ I ...; I '-' Olrectors PHILIP L. ANTHONY KATliRYN L. BARR ROBERT L. CLARK • Officers JOHNGARTHE Preaident JOHN V. FONLEY First Vice Prellident _.DONN HALL JOHN V. FON1.EY JOHNGARlHE LAWRENCE P. KRAEMER, JR. Second Vice President LAWRENCE P. KRAEMER, JR • ._ AUGUST F. LENAIN LANGDON W. OWEN ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NEIL M. CUNE Secretaty Msnager I NOBLE J. WAITE 1m1 July 25, 1984 - Mr. Thomas M •. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County · P.o~ Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Dawes: Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Formation of County Sanitation District No. 13 SCH#82082005 This is in response to your letter dated July 12, 1984, transmit- ting the subject report. There is confusion as to the amount of sewage that the proposed District 13 will generate. On page ll it is stated that the district ·will ultimately generate 11.04 MGD of sewage, but on page 20 it is estimated that 6.14 MGD will occur. Also, on page 19 it 'is stated that the district will ultimately consume 6.35 MGD of water which does not seem to be consistent with the 6.14 MGD of wastewater. · The report does not mention which sewage plant, Plant 1 or Plant 2, will receive the flow from the new district. As stated in our previous correspondence, the District is concerned about new sewage flows as related to quality because of the wastewater reclamataon program. Very truly yours, Ne!~er~ Assistant Manager/ District Engineer NLR:dao 10500 aus AVENUE • P.O. BOX 8300 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728 TELEPHONE (714) 963-5661/~260 .. I , I ... . .. · i : RECEiVED '-i August 24, 1984 AUG 3 0 1984 L Mr. Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer Oranqe County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Dawes: £NVIRONM6NTAL STUDIER DIV. DRAFT ENVIORNMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 \ i _, \ i I ... I 1.- I \ ~ Thank you for the opportunity to reviE!W the draft enviornmenta\ '. impact report for the above referenced project. The City of • Irvine has no comments to offer at this time reqardinq the draft EIR. Please continue to keep us informed of projects which could potentially impact the city. Sincer~ely, 72/j /¥ . I i '-' . / ~/r /;~4 -.. l-f' ~I. . Ed Mo e '· r Sen~ Planner cc: John Murphy \ i '-l I .i ... rA TE Of CAllfORNIA--offfCE OF THE GOVERNOR GEORG! DEUKMEJIAN, Gowmor OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH ~ ~ &00 TENTH STREET ._.t.CRAMENTO, CA 9S814 ... . August 20, 1984 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 SUbject: Formation of Sanitation District No. 13, SCH #83090702 Dear Sir: '!he State Clearingbouse sutmitted the aCove named draft Environnental Impict Report CEIR> to selected state agencies for reriew. 'l!le review period is c:J.osed and the cam- ments Of the individual a.gency(ies) isCarel attached. If yai would like to discuss their concerns and rec'111anendations1 please contact: the staff fran the app:opriate ac;encyCiesl. · When prepu:ing the fiml EIRI you must: inCluae all o"U1a1ts and resi:cnses CcmA Guidelines, Section 15132>. '?he certified EIR must be. considered in the decision-· making process for the p:oject:. In additio111 we urge you to resplnd directly to the commenting agency(ies) by writing to theDI including the·State Clearinghouse number on all ccrrespondence. In the event that the project: is aP1%oved without adequate mitigat:i.on of significant effects, the lead agency mst make written findings for each significant effe= and it must supplrt its actions with a written statenent of overriding considerations for each ucmitigated significant effect CaJ:lA Guidel.ines Section 15091and15093> • If the project re::iuires discretiona.ty approval fran arq state agency, the Notice of Determination must be filed with the Secretary fer Resources, as well as with the County Clerk. Please contact Christine Goggin at C916l 445-0613 if you have any ques- tions about the envirormental review process. --a~ Jahn a. CbaDian 7' Qlief Deputy Director cc: Resources Agent::/ attachment Stat• Qf calif omia Project Nc>tiiication·and RSview Syatan State Clearinghouse (916) 445--0613 • ! .!::" ~ Tr.rLE: FORMATION OF SANITA'l'IOftISJiUcr 00 13 · STATE a.FARINGBOOSE WMBmt: 83090702 REVIE.W STARTS: (17 /18/ 84 REVIE.W ENIS: 08/20/84 a:NTAcr: CBRIS GCGGIN (REVIE.W STARTS CN NEXT DAY WHEN lXXlDENT IS RECEIVED· AFI'ER 10: 00 A.M.) I ~ L i ' I.I . I ..., \ ' I i.i I I 1-1 Please use tbe State Cl.eadngbouse tllltaer an future correspDlance vitb tbi.8) ' off.lee and ~itb agencies approving or reviewing ycur project.. · i..i 1bia cud does not verify casp.ianca vU:b envircnmtal revier requitaDentac A letter containing the State•a comments or a letter confim:ing no State) ~ta will bt focwacded to you after the revia1 is caa¢ete. 6-l aw. 8/8.1 \ I.I I i.. i i ... I I f ' I.I I 1 ~ I I 1-i . ' ~L,,.. of Califomia The Resources Agency 'JA~morandum r 1111 l. Projects Coordinator Resou~ces Agency 2. O:irange County Sanitation Dist~ict P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,. CA 92708 Department of Fish and Game . -... ·~.:.. .·:. . : . :· ·. . .. . . . .,.-·. ·: Dates August 13, 1984 S··"iect: D~aft Focused EIR:· PoJnDation of Sanitation· District No. 13 -SCH 83090702 ... - The· pJroposed pir~ject is the fomnation of Sanitation District Number. 13 in O:irange County·. This District will seirvice other pJrejects to be generally and individually described and approved· by City and County goveirnments· and will not have significant adveJrse fish and wildlife effects of its own. · · The Oepa:i!'.tment of .Fish and Game will Jrely on the envi%onmental analysis CEOA requi%es from each lead agency to determine potential adve%se effects to fish and wildlife resou%ces f:irom those other projects. TherefoJre, the· document desc:iribed in SCH No. 83090702 should not be used as a ireference document regarding the effects of such otheJr p~ojects on fish and wildlife resources. Thank you foll' the. opportunity to present these comments. If you hav~ any questions, please contact Jack L. Sp~uill of ou% Environmental Services staff in Region ·S at 245 w. B~oadway, tong Beach, CA 90802-4467 or by· telephone at (213) 590-5137 • ~~~~~!fil 3tate a1eannpouse .j..-.-Ja~k c. Parnell Director ·.:-· .. / ... / ~/Mr. Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY PLANNING August 21. 1984 County Sanitation Districts of O.C. P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley. California 92708 Fll.E SUBJECT:· DEIR on Formation of Co~ty Sanitation District No. 13 SCH #82082005 Dear Mr. Dawes: MURRAY STORMI : DI RECTOR, EMA~ ROBERT G. FISHER DIRECTOR OF PLANNING1 LOCATION :l.. 12 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA P .0. BOX 4048 SANTA ANA, CA 92702·40481 MAILING ADDRESS:'-' P.O. BOX 4048 SANTA ANA. CA 92702-4048 TELEPHONE:L' . (714) 834-4643 I I I_, I i.J· L I ~ The Environmental Management Agency does not have any comments with respect to the Draft.Environmental Report for the proposed project. We request L the three (3) copies of the final EIR be sent to us when it is available. If you have any questions, please contact me at 834-5550. Very truly yours, Alex G. Ghobadi Environmental Analysis Division AAG:am I '-' L I '-' I '-' . ···-·-···--·-, I ______ _J CIVIC CULTURAL CENTER Number One Civic Center Circle Brea. Collfornlo 92621 Tele,::Jhone ('n4) 990-7600 August 3, 1984 County Sanitation Districts P. 0 •. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attn:: Mr. Thomas M. Dawes · Deputy Chief Engineer \ SUBJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL. REPORT ON· THE FORMATION OF DEPUTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.. 13. SCH#82082005 Dear. Mr~. Dawes : The: City of Brea has: completed its review of the above referenced. DEIR. We nave no comments to make· at· this-time. We understand the purpose of the formation of the· district and will attempt to be as cooperative as possible in the implementation of this district. If you have any questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ti ; i°' i \1 > : . { :\,.;•'I \ .. •..\.t.\.f. -William R. Kelly Director· of Development Services WRK/cap cc: P. McCa rron ,. Di rector of Maintenance Services S. Peterson, City Engineer ,. I ,\-,AYOR R. W. Luxembourger VICE MAYOR Oanief E. Criset COUNCJLMEMBERS John Acosta Cordon Bricken P. Lee Johnson Patricia A. .~uigan Dan Young CITY OF SANT A ANA Mr. Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA• P.O. BOX 1988 SANT A ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 July 27, 1984 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Va l1 ey, CA 92708 SUBJECT: DRAFT EIR ON THE FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 Dear Mr• Dawes : I ALL-AMERICA QTY 1982-SL; CITY MANAGER Robert C. Bobb CITY A liORNEY 1 Edward J. Cooper ~ I Ci.ERK OF THE COUNCIL Janice C. Cuy L L I.I ~ The City of Santa Ana has no conment regarding the subject fonnation of County Sanitation District No. 13. Said fonnation of CSD No. 13 wi11 L have no adverse impact to· our facilities. · Very tna ly yours , tJ.17WiiJ"~~~~~ C. St phen Bucknam, Jr. Senior C1 vi l Engi.neer Water Engineer1 ng CSB/AE/sf ,. I u I i I ~ L L L u i I b.i I I.I L -. .. ·iii - I October 3, 1984 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CA LIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714) 540-2910 0 14) 962-2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE September 26, 1984 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Present: Richard B. Edgar, Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin, Vice Joint Chairman Robert Hanson Henry Wedaa Don Roth Evelyn Hart James Wahner Don Smith Ruth Bailey Supervisor Roger Stanton Absent: None Convene: Adjourn: 5:30 p.m. 8:30 p.m. Others present: Director Don Saltarelli Director James Neal Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Andrew Schlange, SAWPA James Anderson, RWQCB Staff present: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Blake P. Anderson, Director of Operations 1) Department of Health Services/SAWPA Proposal to Dispose of Treated Stringfellow Groundwaters Andrew Schlange, General Manager of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and James Andaerson, Executive Officer of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board reviewed the California Department of Health Services' (OOHS) proposed plan for disposing of treated groundwaters from the Stringfellow site in Riverside County. The project's objective is to aid in preserving the underground water basin of both the upper and lower Santa Ana River. The OOHS, in cooperation with SAWPA, the u. s. Environmental Protection Agency and the Regional Water Quality Control Board, has developed a plan which proposes to construct a facility at Stringfellow to pretreat the extracted, contaminated groundwater to strict standards and then safely and economically dispose of it into the Santa Ana River Interceptor System which would then transport it to the Districts' Joint Works for further treatment and disposal in the same manner as other incoming wastewater. SAWPA presently owns a capacity right in the Districts' Santa Ana River Interceptor which was constructed in the 1970's to remove high saline wastes from the upper basin to protect the underground aquifers. A capacity right in the Joint Treatment Works has also , been acquired by SAWPA. Mr. Schlange stated that the project is supported by Report of the Executive Committee Page Two September 28, 1984 the Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Water Quality Control Board, the State Department of Health Services, Orange County Health Department and the Orange County Water District and submitted copies of letters from each of these agencies. Mr. Schlange stated that SAWPA was requesting concurrence by the Districts' Boards for issuance of a permit to the State Department of Health Services for interim disposal of the Stringfellow wastes. The pretreatment system to be installed at Stringfellow would treat the extracted groundwaters to the same strict requirements imposed on industrial dischargers in Orange County under the Districts' Industrial Waste Ordinance. The system will not be connected directly to the trunk sewer. The pretreated water will be placed in a holding tank and undergo laboratory analysis to assure that it is in compliance with the discharge limits prior to being trucked for disposal into the sewer . Mr. Schlange noted that this method provides an extra measure of safety. If it does not meet the standards for disposal to the sewer it will be recycled through the treatment process or transported to a Class I disposal site. Mr. Anderson, Executive Officer of the CRWQCB observed that the reason that the treated wastewater is proposed to be disposed of through the Districts' system rather than reinjecting it into the underground is because it is higher in salt content than allowed. He added that the proposed permit to be issued to OOHS by SAWPA could be revoked at any time by the Districts. The Committee reviewed the proposal at considerable length, discussed the operating and administrative controls that would be incorporated into the program, the potential inter-relationship of the several governmental agencies that would be involved and the public perception of the matter. The Joint Chairman, with the Committee's concurrence, directed the staff and General Counsel to submit further information on the proposal for review by the Committee at their October 24th meeting. 2) Review of Policies/Procedures re Identification and Permitting of Industrial Waste Dischargers. The General Manager reported that, as an off-agenda item at the August meeting of the Joint Boards, the owner of a coin-operated laundry in Fountain Valley addressed the Directors, protesting current procedures for identifying and permitting dischargers under the provisions of the Industrial Waste Ordinance. The laundromat owner was requested to submit his concerns in writing to the staff for a report back to the Boards. Mr. Sylvester reviewed the staff report addressing the concerns recently raised by coin-operated laundromat owners and proposed staff recommended r modifications of certain existing procedures that respond to these concerns, yet maintain the integrity of the program. The Committee recommends that the enclosed Summary Staff Report and Recommendations re Industrial Waste Permit Policies and Procedures be approved. -,.. Report of the Executive Committee Page Three September 28, 1984 3) Review of General Counsel's Compensation. The Conunittee considered a request from the Districts' General Counsel for an increase in compensation (see enclosed) • The General Manager reported that from his viewpoint, performance of the General Counsel has been excellent, not only in his relationship with the Districts' staff but he has also represented the Districts in a superior manner in legal matters both inside and outside the courtroom. The Committee is pleased with Mr. Woodruff's performance both on behalf o·f the Districts and his participation in the CASA and AMSA Attorney's Committees. He is presently Chairman of the AMSA Legal Affairs Conunittee. The Committee reconunends th~ rates for the General Counsel and associate members of his firm be increased, as requested . r SUPPORTING MATERIAL RE ITEM 1 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES /SAWPA PROPOSAL TO DISPOSE OF TREATED STRINGFELLOW GROUNDWATERS INTO THE DISTRICTS' SEWERAGE SYSTEM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P . O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 2060 Chicago Avenue, Suite C-3 Riverside, CA 92507 Attention: J. Andrew Schlange, Manager August B, 1984 Subject: DOHS/SAWPA Proposal for Interim Treatment and Disposal Program for Stringfellow Groundwaters • TELCPHON CS: ARCA COOC 7'~ 540-2910 962-2411 At their regular meeting on July 25th our Executive Conunittee reviewed your letter of July 16, 1984 relative to subject proposal. That letter informed us that the State Department of Health Services (DOHS) and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) were proposing an interim plan to construct a pretreatment facility to treat the contaminated groundwater to be extracted from the Stringfellow site and to dispose of it through the Santa ·Ana River Interceptor System which drains to the County Sanitation Districts' joint treatment and disposal works; and that SAWPA had issued Requests for Proposals for design, construction management and operation of the proposed pretreatment facility. ·This agency certainly concurs that the groundwaters of the Santa Ana River Basin ·nee9 be protected. As you ~now, concern for the preservation of the underground basin was a fundamental reason for the construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor by the Districts and the joint participation of SAWPA. It is paramount that any wastes from Stringfellow be disposed of in a technically sound and environmentally safe manner. Clearly, this determination is the purview of the applicable regu~atory agencies, the State ·and Regional Water Resources Control Boards, the State and County of Orange Health Departments and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Inasmuch as these agencies also have direct or indirect jurisdiction over our activities, the Corranittee deems it necessary that their specific written approval of the plan be obtained before it could even be considered by the Districts' Directors. Accordingly, oefore our Boards would be in a position to review any proposal that may be forthcoming from SAWPA, all of the above regulatory authorities must approve and endorse the program and the proposed treatment and disposal process, along with operational controls, and recommend it as a feasible and environmentally acceptable solution. As you know, federal and Districts' regulations provide that any program would also have to assure that the pretreated wastewater would be in strict compliance with the Districts' industrial waste ordinance. Appropriate consideration would, of course, have to be given to all other relevant factors. .. J. Andrew Schlange Page Two August 8, 1984 Further, since the Orange County Water District is responsible for groundwater basin management and is active in water reclamation, their support of the program is desirable. Thank you for informing us of the plans being undertaken to resolve the Stringfellow groundwater waste disposal problem . We would appreciate it if you would keep this office advised of the details of the proposed program as they evolve and provide us with additional information on the plan and the safeguards being incorporated to enable our staff to evaluate any formal proposal that may subsequently be submitted by SAWPA for consideration. JWS:dl 2060 Chicag o Ave .. S uue C-3 . Riverside. C.ilrf 925 07 COMMI SS10"' FOR T HE PR OJ EC:T >UT><O R I T Y C H I N O BAS IN M U N IC I PAL WATEq Q1S TRIC T 0 1'ANGE COUN TY W.>.TE R 01STR 1C T S AN B ERNARDI NO VALLE Y M lt'l1G1P A L "" TER OIS TRICT WESTERN M U N I CIPAL WATE R Q 1S •R 1("T Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester General Manager September 14, 1984 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis A venue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 SUBJECT: PROPOSED DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR TREATED STRINGFELLOW WASTEWATERS TO THE SANTA ANA REGIONAL INTERCEPTOR SEWER SYSTEM. Dear Sir: MANAG ER J t,NO REW SCH L ANG E Transmitted herewith is a proposed permit to be issued by SA WPA to the State Department of Health Services for the disposal of treated wastewaters from the Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site in Glen Avon in Riverside County to the SARI line. Pursuant to the agreement between SA WPA and the Sanitation Districts, I am hereby requesting your concurrence in the issuance of this permit to the De- partment of Health Services. SA WP A in its responsibilities to improve the ground water quality and its o bliga- tions to the people in the upper and lower basin to protect these groundwaters, entered into a contract with the State Department of Health Services to act as their agent in this interim clean-up program. Considerable amount of effort over the past several months has gone into the drafting of this permit so that none of the Districts' programs are jeopardized in the interim 11 clean-up11 program for the Stringfellow site. As you know, the U.S. EPA, State Department of Health Services, the Regional Water Quality Control Board and other agencies have for several years been seeking a solution for the contaminated waters from the Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site. In a recent study conducted by EPA, Region IX, and their consulting engineers, several remedial alternatives were examined. The following technolo- gies were identified as candidates for the management and disposal of the con- taminated extracted groundwaters from the Stringfellow site. These remedial alternatives which were considered are as follows: • Discharge to a publicly owned treatment works (POTW). • Pretreatment followed by discharge to a publicly owned treat- ment works . Total Wa t er Quality Management -SA WPA 's Commitment to the Co mmunity (i 14) 682·6080 ; \ Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY September 14, 1984 Page Two • Reinjection into the ground ---either onsite or offsite. • Treatment followed by reinjection into the ground --.-either onsite or offsite. • Solar evaporation. • Incineration. • Surface discharge. • Treatment followed by surface discharge. • Disposal at a Class I land disposal site. • Disposal at a Class Il-1 land disposal site ---with or without treatment. • Disposal at a permitted hazardous waste treatment facility . • Reuse as industrial process water. • Future treatment of drinking water at the tap. These remedial alternatives went through an initial screening which resulted in the consideration of only five alternatives which appeared to be cost effective for an interim remedial solution. The five selected were pretreatment and discharge to a publicly owned treatment works; treatment and reinjection into the g round; treat and surface discharge; disposal at a Class I landfill; and disposal at a Class Il-1 landfill. After consideration of all the alternatives, the cost effectiveness, as well as the environmental impacts, the selected interim remedial solution is to treat the extracted groundwaters to an acceptable level and discharge to a sanitary sewer where the waste would be co-mingled with existing sanitary sewer waste treated and disposed to the marine environment. SA WP A, in the execution of i ts responsibilities to improve and protect the ground- waters of the Santa Ana River Basin and its obligations to all those affec ted by the groundwaters, offered to the Department of Health Serv ices to act as its agent in the implementation of an interim remedial program for the treatment and disposal of the Stringfellow waste. Under contract to the DOHS, SA WPA pr e pared an RFP and solicited proposals from professional engineering firms for the design and con- struction management of a pretreatment facility which wo uld treat the e xtracted groundwaters to the prescribed limits set forth in the proposed permit transmitted herewtth. Five highly qualified professional engineering firms were e valuated to ; '\ Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY September 14, 1984 Page Three perform the tasks outlined in the RFP. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engi- neers of Pasadena were selected to provide the necessary engineering services. On August 21, 1984, the Board of Directors of SA WPA issued a contract with the concurrence of the Department of Health Services to James M. Montgomery for the design and construction management of the pretreatment facilities. Also attached with this letter is an implementation schedule of the activities proposed for the design and construction of these facilities in order that the treatment can commence by January 1, 1985. You will note that a two-week start-up period is scheduled in the latter part of December . The EPA has estab- lished the treatment process and has conducted treatability studies to insure permit compliance. Your participation in this start-up program is welcomed. Also, on August 21, 1984, SA WPA authorized the execution of a contract, with the concurrence of OOHS, with Lowry and Associates to have Mr. Ray E . Lewis assist SA WPA 's staff in the coordination of this project. Mr . Lewis' familiarity with the Districts' concerns will also help in asGuring permit compliance. I am sure you and your Board realize the importance of the control of the con- tamination of the groundwaters in the Santa Ana River Basin which affect both the upper and lower basin users of the groundwaters. This program, after a thorough investigation, is the best apparent interim remedial solution and c on- tains the safeguards in the design, operation and monitoring of the program to provide you, the Board of Directors, and the people of Orange County, that the utmost caution has been taken to insure a minimum of impacts and the success of the program. Because of the fast-track program for the design and construc- tion of the facilities, it would be appreciated if you and your Board would expedite concurrence in the issuance of this permit. rtk Attachments Very truly yours, nager TERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY ' \ SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY WASTE PERMIT STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF DISCHARGER: State of California -Department of Health Services Toxic Substance Control Division 714/744 "P" Street Sacramento, CA 95814 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF DISCHARGE: (A) Effective Date of Permit: January 1, 1985. (B) Location of Origin of Discharge: Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site , Glen Avon, Riverside County. (C) Location of Point of Discharge to SARI System: At trunk dis- posal stations. (CB-1 and W-1) (D) Nature of Permitted Discharge: Interim treatment program for extracted contam inated groundwaters from Stringfellow. (E) The Discharger hereby agrees to adhere to SA WPA's ordinances, resolutions and regulations regulating the use and availability of the SARI System. (F) The Discharger hereby agrees to permit SA WPA, at any reasonable time and without prior notice, to inspect and take wastewater samples. (G) (H) . (I) No vested right of any kind, including the right to discharge, s hall be acquired by the issuance of this Permit. The Discharger acknowledges and agrees that since the discharge permitted hereunder will be transported to treatment facilities operated by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, any c hanges made in their requirements will be automatically in- corporated into this Permit. SA WP A reserves the right to s uspend or revoke this Permit for any violations or non-compliance with SA WPA's ordinances, resolutions, or regulations governing the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) system. -1- I ! l Date: Date: (J) The Discharger hereby acknowledges and agrees that since the discharge permitted hereunder will be transported to the treatment and disposal facilities of the CSDOC, that at any reasonable time without prior notice, representatives of the CSDOC may inspect the interim pretreatment facili- ties and take wastewater samples to insure permit complaince as it affects their facilities. (K) The Discharger hereby agrees that the on-site operation at the interim pretreatment facilities shall be supervised and directed by a registered professional engineer knowledgeable in wastewater and toxic waste facilities operation to insure competency of operation and meeting permit requirements. (L) This Permit may not be assigned without the prior written consent of SA WPA . (M) This Permit shall be for a three (3) year period expiring on December 31, 1987 . (N) Fees and Charges: Disposal to the SARI line shall be as follows: (Cents per gallon) (0) Basic SA WP A Charge Basic WM WD Charge SARI O&M Capacity Lease SA WP A Contract Management 0.50 0.50 0.06 0.10 0.50 1.66* *Escalated annually to the same degree that charges for other SA WPA permit fees are escalated . Other terms and Conditions: See attachment designated as "Attachment 1" for permit limitations. SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY By: DISCHARGER: By: -2- ~ J' I f' , ) • ' "ATTACHMENT l" STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE DISCHARGE PERMIT GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. All permit limitations must be verified by laboratory analysis at treatment plant site prior to disposal to the SARI system by a laboratory approved by SAWPA . (a) Limitations on heavy metals must be verified on each day of discharge on a 24-hour flow rated composite. (b) Limitations on total toxic organics (TTO) must be verified on a monthly basis, however, a daily certification must be made in accordance with Section 413 .03 of the Federal Clean Water Act as published in the Federal Register on July 15, 1983, Vol. 48, No. 137. 2. Any samples taken and analyzed by SA WPA at the trunk disposal stations which are found in excess of permit limitations set forth herein are subject to the following non-compliance fees and penalties: (a) $300.00 per pound for each pound, or portion thereof, of heavy metals in excess of limitation. (b) $500.00 per pound for each pound, or portion thereof, of TTO in excess of limitations. (c) Fees outlined in 2 .a and 2.b above are for the first or initial violations within a 12-month period. (d) A second violation in either the heavy metals or TTO limita- tions within a 12-month period, may result in addition to the fees set forth in 2.a and 2.b the suspension of this permit for a period not-to-exceed 30 days until discharge can demon- strate ability to continuously meet permit limitations. (e) More than three violations within a 12-month period will re- sult in permit revocation. In the event of permit revocation, the Discharger may reapply for a discharge permit pursuant to SA WP A's Ordinance. Before consideration of re-issuance of a discharge permit to the SARI system, corrective action must be taken to insure continued permit compliance. -1- PERMIT LIMITATIONS 1. The initial interim pretreatment facilities are to be designed to treat 0 .187 MGD (130 gpm). The following permit limitations are based upon a maximum daily discharge of 0.187 MGD (130 gpm): Constituent Arsenic Cadmium Chromium (total) Copper C yanide (total) Cyanide (free) Lead Mercury Nickel Silver Zinc Total Toxic Organics (TTO) Max . Mass Limits lbs/day 3 .1 0.1 3 .1 4.7 2.0 1.6 0.9 0.05 5.5 0.7 1.1 0.9 2. The permit limitations as set forth in paragraph 1 above shall become effective on the effective date of this permit. The Discharger may be permitted to discharge flows in excess of 0.187 MGD (130 gpm) only upon approval of SA WPA and subsequent amendment to this permit. -2- MONT H WEEK PHASE I -DET Al.ED DE SIGN 1. INV ENT OR Y/CO MPILE EX ISTING INFORMATION 2. ESTABL ISH DETAILED DESIG N CRITERIA 3. IDENTIF Y SITE CONSTRAINT S ... DEVELOP DETAILED DESIGN DATA/FACILITIES LAYOUT 5 . EQUIPMENT PROCUR EMENT SCH EDULING 8 . PREPARATION OF DETAILED PLANS A ND SPECIFICATIONS 1 . 0 & M MANU A L 8 . COST ESTIMATE PHASE 11 -CONSTRUCTION/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 1. BID PERIOD ASSISTAN CE 2 . CONST RU CTIO N ADMINISTRATION 3 . CO N STRU CTION INSPECTION/RESIDEN T ENGINEERING ... PROJECT STA RT-UP AND CLOSEOUT PH A SE 111 -FA CILITIES OPERATIONS PROJECT ACTIVIT Y PROJECT REVIEW ACTIVITIES PROGRESS REPORTS & BILLINGS DES IGN PRO GRESS RE PO RTS TAC MEETIN GS CONSTRUC TION M ANA GEM ENT REP ORTS MEET INGS WITH SA WPA NOTE: BCHE DULE 18 EXCLUSIVE O F CHA NOES REOUI RE D AB A REBUL T OF RE VI EW B Y THE STATE OF CALIFO RNIA AND OTH ER INTERESTED P AR TIES AUGUS T SEPTEMBE R OCTOBER NOVEMBER 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 I NOTICE TO PROCEE D I l I I I CRITERIA TAB ULATION I DESIGN RE P ORT -DESIGN I C ONT RAC T DOCUMENTS BASIS DRAF T 0 & M MANUAL --<> SU MMARY C OST E STIM AT E l IPREP URCHA S ~I .. -DOCUME NTS J BID P ~R IOD I AWARD I -. ---0 I FIN ~L 0 .. M MAN U AL! - I RECOMME NDA TION I TO A WA RD BID PERI OD . • PRO JECT DEBIO N BID P ERIOD PRO JECT C ONST RUC TION • ---- --- PROJECT ACTIVITIES DIAGRAM AND SCHEDULE --. I • DECEMBER JANUARY 1985- 2 9 16 23 1988 , !RE COR D D RAWIN OS I I PROJEC T ACCE PT AN CE TO BE DET ERMINED - START-UP OPER ATION I • ,,, •I :: - UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 215 Fremont Street San Francisco, Ca . 94105 S~nta Ana Watershed Project Authority 2060 Chicago Suite C-3 Riverside, CA 92507 Attention: Mr. J. Andrew Schlange Manager Dear Mr. Schlange: 1 6 JUL 1984 On January 9, 1984, the EPA approved Orange County Sanita- tion Districts' pretreatment program. In its program submittal, the Districts described their capability, authority, and responsi- bility for implementing Federal pretreatment requirements within their service area (including SAWPA's jurisdiction). Included within this authority is the Districts' right to refuse to ac- cept or to discontinue accepting wastewater discharges to the sewer system to prevent impa i rment of the quality of receiving waters or other problems in the treatment facilities. The EPA believes that this is the most reasonable and effe ctive means f o r. .pxoviding comprehensive regulation of the numerous industrial sources that discharge to POTWs throughout the country. In addition to our review and approval of OCSD's pretreatment program, this office has kept abreast of the proposed sewer dis- charge permit for treated groundwater e x tracted from the String- fellow site. Since OCSD i s operating an EPA approved pretreatment program, it has the primary responsibility for assuring compliance with pretreatment requ i rements. Nevertheless, after reviewing the limitations developed by SAWPA for the St.ring fellow discharge, it appears that those limitations will be adequate to protect water quality and treatment plant operations. Questions should be addressed to Gregory Baker of my staff at (415) 974-8336. Sincerely, ~a. Frank M. Covington Director, Water Man cc: orange County Sanitation Districts s RECEIVEu JUL 1 7 i 984 S. A. W. P. A 1~ Division STATE OF-.CALIFORNIA· CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTRO°L BOARD SANTA ANA REGION 6809 INOIANA AVENUE, SUITE ZOO "''VERSIOE, CAL.IFORNIA 92506 .-iONE: (714) 684-9330 July 24, 1984 Mr. J. Andrew Schlange, Manager Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 2060 Chicago Avenue, Suite C-3 Riverside, CA 92507 Dear Mr. Schlange: GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor We have reviewed SAWPA's draft permit limits for discharge of treated extracted groundwater from the Stringfellow site to the SARI line. Based on our evaluation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's current flows and influent and effluent quality, we do not anticipate that the pro- posed discharge will affect CSDOC's NPDES permit compliance. In addition, we note that CSOOC has an EPA-approved pretreatment program, and that this office recommended approval of the program. This pretreatment program gives the Districts adequate legal and procedural authority to regulate all discharges to their system to ensure permit compliance and protection of the treatment works. If you have any questions, please contact me or Kurt Berchtold of my staff • .____s_i~n~~~ JAMES W. ANDERSON Executive Officer cc: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County State Departament of Health Services, Sacramento -Tom Bailey KVB:nao STA~~ qi;FORNIA-HEAlTH AND WElFARE ,~-~CY . ll • GEORGE. DEUKMEJIAN, Gowmor DEPARTMl:NT O~ HEALTH SERVICES 71~/74' P STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 (916) 324-3773 '-11 Hr. Andrew Schlange, General Manager Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 2060 Chicago Avenue, Suite C-3 Riverside, CA 92507 Dear Mr. Schlange: July 24, 1984 The Department has reviewed the limitations proposed by your agency for the effluent from a wastewater pretreatment plant to be constructed at the Stringfellow site discharging to the SARI line. Effluent discharged to the SARI line at or below these limits would not, in the· judgement of the Department, adversely affect public health or the environment at any location nor impair subsequent treatment and disposal operations conducted by the County Sanitati·on Districts of Orange· County.· · The· provision of a·wastewater pretreatment at the Stringfellow site· will be a vast improvement over present practices which include the trucking or· untreated wastewater over 200 miles across Southern · California for subsequent disposal.. The Department expects· that any· pretreatment plant established at the Stringfellow site will. op.erate in full accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements and regulations. The· Department is in complete support of the program your agency is developing.to construct and operate a first class pretreatment racili ty at the: Stringfellow site by January, 1985 pursuant to the terms of the contract between SAWPA and the Department. We look forward to your continued assistance·. Sincerely, Thomas E. Bailey, Chief Program Management Section Toxic. Substances Control Division REc·e:av E&J JUL 2 5 i984 .. '...,I S. A. W. P.-A ·• Directors Oflicer/J -PHILIP L. ANTHONY KATHRYN L BARR ROBERT L CLARK JOHNGARTHE Presi dent JOHN V. FONLEY DONN HAU JOHN V. FONLEY JOHNGARTHE LAWRENCE P. KRAEMER, JR. AUGUST F. U:NAIN LANGDON W. OWEN NOBLE J . WAITE .ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT July 23, 1984 Nr. Andrew Schlange, Manager Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 20GO Chicago Avenue, Suite C-3 Riverside, CA 92507 Dear Iir. Schlange: Stringfellow Hazardous Haste Site . Fir!ft Vice PrelJident LAWRENCE P. KRAEMER , JR. Second Vice Pre1Jident NEIL M . CLINE Secretary Manager The Orange County Water District has reviewed the request for engineering proposals to provide services, support, and facilities for the removal, treatment, and disposal of contaminated ground- water from the Stringfellow hazardous waste site in Riverside County. We feel that such a program will have minimum impact on this District's wastewater reclamation activities conducted at our Water Factory 21. It is our ~nderstanding that ·any contaminated groundwater which is treated prior to disposal in the Santa Ana River interceptor will probably be diverted around the Orange County Sanitation Districts' Treatment Plant No. l, since that line contains other high TDS wastewaters, making it less usable for reclamation. Aft~r reviewing the permit limitations proposed for waste dis- charges from the Stringfellow cleanup operation, we believe there would be little if any impact on the water quality and reclamation activities of this District even if the waters were d i verted and treated at the Sanitation .Districts' Plant Ho. 1. Therefore, we would support the SAWPA program for cleaning up the contaminated groundwater. Very truly yours, David G. Argo Assistant Hana<:fer and Chief Engineer 01~/mm cc : Wayne S v lvester, Oranqe County Sanita tion Di stric ts 10500 ELLIS AVENUE ·'"P.O. BOX~ FOUNTA'IN VALLEY, CA(IFORNIA 92726 TELE PH ONE (71 4 ) 963-5661/556-8260 CHARLU D. Kl:RNS, ~H.D., MBA DU•KCTO" L. RSX l:HLING, M.D. HKAl.TH 0 .... ICK" 1729 WKST I 7TH ST,.KKT SANTA ANA. CA t270• September 26, 1984 PUBLIC HEAL TH AND MEDICAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Mr . J. Andrew Schlange, Manag€r Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 2060 Chicago, Suite C-3 Riverside, CA. 92507 Dear Mr. Schlange: TKl.K-ONK1 7t 4/•34·7•0 I MAIL.ING AOD .. KSS1 ... 0. SOX lSS SANTA ANA! C:A tZ70Z We have reviewed the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority's July 1984 Request for Proposals, along with letters from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Orange County Water District, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, regarding the treatment of extracted groundwater from the Stringfellow site to be discharged into the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer. Based on our evaluation of the available information, it does not appear that the proposed discharge will adversely affect the County Sanitation District•s operations or disposal programs. We believe that, if the facility is adequately designed and properly operated, the proposed treatment scheme can provide adequate removal of contaminants to assure compliance with the pretreatment standards of the County Sanitation Districts. We concur with the findings of the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency that the County Sanitation Districts have an adequate pretreatment program with sufficient authority to terminate wastewater discharges into the sewer system that threaten to impair the quality of receiving waters or that create problems in the Districts' treatment fac i l i ties . We have also been informed that the County Sanitation Districts' staff intend to verify the quality of the discharge by periodic spot checks at the Stringfellow treatment facility. If problems are subsequently discovered, this Agency will cooperate with the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to insure that appropriate actions are taken . Mr. Schlange September 26, 1984 Page 2 In sunnnary, we believe that based upon the current available information, there are adequate controls to assure that the discharge of treated groundwater from the Stringfellow site into the Santa Ana River Interceptor line will not pose a threat to the health and welfare of the people of Orange County. If you have any questions, please contact my staff at 834-6925. Very truly yours, ~rr,..a~n~,_...~w;111.....,. Director Environmental Health REM/st cc: Wayne Sylvester, Orange County Sanitation Districts Tom Bailey, State Dept. of Health Services Jim Anderson, Regional Water Quality Control Board Dave Argo, Orange County Water District Frank Covington, U.S. EPA • UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 215 Fremont Street San Francisco. Ca. 941 05 Mr. Andrew Schlange, General Manager Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 2060 Chicago Avenue, Suite C-3 Riverside, CA 92507 Dear Mr. Schlange: As you know, EPA recently completed a Fast Track Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) to identify and evaluate alternatives to the current extraction and off-site disposal of contaminated groundwater from the Stringfellow site in Glen Avon, California. As a result, EPA has authorized construction of an on-site pretreatment plant consisting of lime precipita- . tion for the removal of heavy metals and granular activated carbon for the removal of organics. Treated effluent would be discharged to a local publicly owned treatment works system and sludge would be disposed of at a Class I facility. This alternative will be implemented during· the three to five year interim period prior to completion of the full-scale RI/FS and implementation of the final remedy. · The California Department of Health Services (OOHS) concurs with this activity and has submitted an application to EPA for design and implementation funds. The EPA anticipates awarding approximately two million dollars for this purpose in the next week. EPA understands that OOHS has entered into a contract with SAWPA for design and construction management of this project, and may soon enter into a contract for construction and opera- tions. Under the current schedule, SAWPA plans to have a pre- treatment plant operable by January 1985. In a letter dated July 16, 1984, we explained EPA's role in SAWPA's efforts to· obtain a permit from the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County·. The EPA is supportive of SAWPA' s efforts and would like to commend SAWPA in its effort to expedite this project. We appreciate your participation in this project. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (415) 974-8910 if I may be of any assistance. Sincerely yours, Keith Takata, Chief Superfund Programs Branch ~l ~ C £!I\...' ~z C I ~ ~- .1 -• S. A . T SUPPORTING MATERIAL RE ITEM 2 :REVIEW OF POLICIES/PROCEDURES RE IDENTIFICATION AND PERMITTING.OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGERS September 20, 1984 SUMMARY STAFF REPORT & RECOMMENDATIONS RE INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES BACKGROUND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 EWS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714) 540-2910 '714) 962-2411 On two occasions during the past several months, owners of coin-operated laundries have addressed the Boards as off-agenda items concerning the Districts' current practices regarding the identification, permitting and billing of businesses that are ~ubject to the terms and conditions of the Districts' Uniform Requlations for Use of Districts' Sewerage Facilities ·(Industrial Waste Ordinance). In the first instance, the staff prepared a comprehensiv~ report (copy of report' dated· Jurie 19, 1984 is enclosed) outlining the history of the industrial waste program, current practices, and recommended future actions. This report was reviewed by the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards and at the regular. July meeting, continuation of the existing procedures was approved. It was recognized at that time that the task of identifying· and permitting industrial waste dischargers is a rather formidable one and although there is no method that would ensure lOOt equity at all times, it was being accomplished in a systematic, methodical and responsible manner. The actions approved by the Boards in July as recommended in the above referenced July 19th staff report were: 1. That permitt-ing ~d invoicing should begin when high water users are identified as billable users based on predetermined criterion, (continuation of the current practice), as follows: a) That the most appropriate way to systematically search for high water dischargers is to continue to use the criterion of high water use applied across the entire industrial and commercial base of the District's service area. (The previous action level of 1,000,000 gallons per year or more for investigating water users resulted in the issuance of 300 new use permits over the previous cut-off of 12,000,000 gallons.) b) That the cut-off level be dropped to 750,000 gallons per year to identify the next group of potential permittees and require them to pay their cost of sewerage service. 2. a) That the water purveyor survey currently underway be continued so that the Districts can determine what computer capabilities the purveyors have, and what computer capabilities they can develop to assist the Districts. This information is necessary to understand how the screening process can be made more effective. b) That the Districts investigate the feasibility of entering into service contracts with the various water purveyors to develop computerized data searching capabilities. The early returns from the water purveyor survey indicate that many of them cannot presently meet our need. Costs of this service may vary dramatically among purveyors. Asstiming a cost of $2500 to $5000 and a need for between 15 and 20 systems, a total cost of between $37,500 and $100,000 is estimated. However, it would greatly enhance our ability to identify firms subject to the Districts' Use Ordinance and speed up the entire· process. 3. The 1984-85 budget previously approved by the Boards added· six positions (4 clerical and 2 inspection) to the Industrial Waste Staff. The four clerical staff will be used to accelerate efforts to identify, permit and begin to invoice those users whose ad valorem taxes do not off set the actual cost to the Districts to convey, treat, and dispose of their sewage discharge. One full-time Clerk and two part-time Assistants to be hired to provide year round field visits to all water purveyors and field identification of potential permittees. They will collect the data from· the water billing records and transmit that information to the Industrial Waste Division office staff. One full-time Clerk to be hired to send out the Wastewater. Discharge Questionnaries, follow-up on additional informational data when necessary, issue the permit, and coordinate invoicing efforts with the· Districts' Accounting Division. The two added Industrial Waste Inspectors that will be hired during the year will be· assigned to enforce the categorical pretreatment standards mandated by EPA and will not be involved in identifying new permittees. 4. That after ~ine months (March, 1985) of experience in administering the program in this manner a follow-up staff report be submitted to the Executive Conunittee. The report would evaluate the effectiveness of the accelerated program and would provide recommendations for future actions. The additional permits, invoices, and potential collections problems may require an additional accounting clerk and co111Puterized data management. The second instance was brought before the Board as an off-agenda. item in August, by the owner of a coin-operated laundry in Fountain Valley. The owner of the Fountain Valley laundromat, Gene's Launderland, was asked by the Directors to submit his concerns in.writing and the staff was requested to prepare a report for the Boards. Enclosed is a separate staff report dated September 19th, addressing· the concerns expressed by the Fountain Valley laundromat owner. The report also includes staff recommendations for modifying certain procedures. Staff believes that the recommended revisions, swmnarized below, respond to the major concerns that have· been expressed by both of the above referenced business owners, yet will retain the integrity o~ the industrial waste program. -2- RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING PROCEDURES RE IDENTIFYING AND PERMITTING INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL DISCHARGERS 1. Revision in Permit Fee for Class II and Class III users. When the Ordinance was revised in 1983 the permittee classifications were restructured. All permits are currently issued for a one year period, although the Ordinance language allows permits to be issued for up to three years. After evaluating the need for periodic permit review of the various classes, staff is recommending that the period for Class II and Class III permits be issued regularly for three years instead of one year, and that the current one year fee be established for the three · year period. This will result in a two-thirds reduction in the· work necessary to administer these permits and, thus, a similar reduction in the effective annual fee. The change is swmnarized. as follows: RECOMMENDED Total Equivalent Term Annual Term Total Annual PERMITTEE Fee Fee Fee Class II 1 vr. $75.00 3 yrs. $75.00 $25.00 Class III 1 yr~ $50.00 3 yrs. $50.00 $16~67 Class I permits· would continue to.be issued annually as discharges from these permittees require extensive monitoring and analysis and the permit condi~ions should be reviewed more freq\Jently. No change is: recommended for. the current Class I fee of $150 per year. 2.. Revision of Procedures re Identifying, Permitting and Billing Class II and Class III Dischargers. Under the current phasing program of identifying dischargers, ·firms· that discharge in· excess of 750, 000. gallons a year, once identified, are immediately permitted if they are subject to the provisions of the Industrial Waste Ordinance. Billing for services commences with the effective date of the permit and invoices are sent out quarterly. This may cause some short-term inequities. As pointed out in the above-referenced June 19, 1984 report, delaying the assessment of fees for a particular identified user or class of users would exchange one set of inequities for another. However, the staff believes that the argument that businesses may be placed in an unfair competitive· position does have· some merit, although the impact would probably be very minimal in most instances as compared to other costs.associated with doing business. Therefore, staff .reconnnends that to the extent practicable, permits for users .in a given classification (ie., laundromats, car washes, restaurants, etc.) be processed as users are identified. However, final permit issuance and invoicing· would be delayed until enacted simultaneously for all users in a particular class in a given geographical area. The current volume cut-off of 750,000 gallons per· year. would be used as a guideline rather than an absolute criterion. This procedure should substantially reduce the expressed concern for any relative competitive disadvantage. -3- PROCEDURES RE CONSIDERATION OF PROTESTS BY PERMITTEES The recent appearance by the two industrial waste permittees before the Boards, requesting consideration of their protests concerning the applicability of the Districts' Industrial Waste Ordinance to their particular businesses, were as off-agenda items and the permittees did not comply with the Districts' ordinance provisions for such protests. Permittees certainly have every right to request a hearing before the Boards~ However, when they appear at a Board meeting without following the established procedures and request consideration of an off-agenda item, the Directors will not have had the benefit of a written staff report nor the opportunity to review the background of the particular protest~ Therefore, in order to assure that the permittee's protest receives fair and expeditious consideration by both staff and the Boards, it is recommended that when a permittee appears before the· Board requesting off-agenda consideration of his protest, and has not followed the established procedure (excerpted below from the Industrial Waste Ordinance), that he be referred to staff for review of his appeal in accordance with the established procedure. If staff becomes aware that a permittee has a protest prior to his appearance before the Boards they will,·of course, advise him of the· appeal. procedures. In this way, when the . matter comes before the Boards under the. regular agenda process, .the Directors will have a full case history and staff report before them when considering the permittee's appeal. · EXCERPTED· FROM "REGULATIONS FOR USE OF DISTRICT. SEWERAGE FACILITIES" 601.B Appeals A. Any user, permit applicant or permit holder affected by any decision, action or determination made by the General Manager, interpreting or implementing the provisions of this Ordinance or in any permit issued herein, may file with the General Manager a wri~ten request for reconsideration within fifteen (15) days setting forth in detail the facts supporting the· user's request for· reconsideration. Such facts must include a statement listing newly discovered relevant facts that were not known or available to the· user at the date of the hearing.. The General Manager shall render a decision on the request for reconsideration to the user, permit applicant or permit holder in writing within (15 days of receipt of request. If the ruling on the request for reconsideration made by the General Manager is unacceptable, the person requesting reconsideration may, within ten (10) days after the date of notification of the General Manager's action, file a written appeal to the Board. B. A fee of $100 shall accompany any· appeal to the Board of Directors of· the District. This fee may, in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors, be refunded if the final appeal ruling is in favor of the appellant. c·. The written appeal shall. be heard by the District's Board of Directors within forty-five (45) days from the date of filing. The Distr.ict's Board of Directors shall make a final ruling on the appeal within sixty (60) days from· the date of filing. -4-· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS September 19, 1984 BACKGROUND STAFF REPORT RE PROTEST OF GENE'S LAUNDERLAND INCLUSION IN THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT PROGRAM PERMIT NO. II-3-127 of Q RANG E C OUNTY, C ALIF ORN IA P.O .BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9 2708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962·2411 Gene's Launde r land was issued a Class II permit on January 1, 1983, and a permit renewal was issued on January 1, 1984. To date, the renewal permit has not been signed. Numerous phone conversations and letters concerning the permit renewal and inclusion of Gene's Launderland in the Industrial Waste Permit Program have taken place between Districts' staff and Mr. D.H. Blaser, the owner of the firm. As an off agenda item at the August 8, 1984 meeting of the Board of Directors, Mr. Blaser brought forth his contention that coin-operated laundromats should not be included in the Industrial Waste Permit Program. The Board as ked Mr. Blaser to prepare his questions in writing and submit them to the staff. The staff was instructed to review Mr. Blaser' s concerns and report back to the Board. MR. BLASER' S CONCERNS /STAFF RESPONSES Attachment 1 i s a copy of Mr. Blaser' s letter to the Districts outlini ng his concerns. The points raised by Mr. Blaser and the s taff responses are s ummarized below: A. Laundromats are Unique Dischargers Points 1,2,3 a nd 6 of Mr. Blaser's letter contend tha t laundromats are uni- que dischargers that duplicate the functions of wash i ng clothes in the home and, the r efore, there is no net increase in the amount of wastewater pro- cessed by the Districts. Mr . Blaser further contends that the l a undromat owner is not a single user of the sewer faciliti es, but o nly a focal poi nt for many small users. Staff Response: Although laundromat s do prov ide a service tha t might otherwise be per f ormed in the home, they are not unique in th i s regard. Mr. Blaser is theoretically correct in asse r ting that there i s no net increase in f lows resulting from customers washing clothes a t his busines s rather than at their homes. This argument could be e x tende d to nearly all da y time and leisure activ ities outside the home i ncluding r estaurants, hotels, amusement parks, office buildings, f actor i es and other center s of employment outside the home that resul t i n wastewate r d i scharge -. Staff Report September 19, 1984 Page 2 from the businesses to the sewer that would have otherwise originated in the home. However, the Federal Government has effectively precluded this argument by insisting in the revenue requirement section of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA} that users shall pay their proportionate share of the treatment costs. In compliance with the CWA and Districts' revenue program, the cost of conveying and treating wastewater discharges must be recovered from the user. Therefore, it is the Districts' policy to permit businesses when ad valorem taxes are not sufficient to cover the treatment costs for the volume of wastewater discharged from their business. The Districts are currently permitting businesses using approximately 750, 000 gallons per year of water. For most dischargers of 750, 000 gallons per year or more, the cost of treating its wastewater is significantly higher than "the ad valorem taxes received by the Districts on the secured and unsecured property. B. Fairly Apportioned Costs Points 4,5,8 and 10 of Mr. Blaser's letter contend that his customers using the laundromat either directly (homeowners) or indirectly (renters) pay ad valorem taxes for the disposal of wastewater and that the customer's proportionate share of taxes should be credited to the laundromat. The laundromat customer, Mr. Blaser contends, is being charged twice. Staff Response: Mr. Blaser's premise is that the laundromat should be given credit for a portion' of his customer's ad valorem taxes because his business pro- vides an alternative use and, based on his contention, it is therefore unique. Ad valorem tax credits can only be issued against the property for which a permit has been issued. As stated above (under A) the discharge of sewage from a business may be partially or wholly the result of the activity of the customers but this is not a unique situation and does not relieve the business from paying the cost of sewer service for that business. The business is responsibile for the cost. to treat the wastewater discharged from its facility. An average residence discharges about 128, 000 gallons of wastewater per year and will pay the Districts through ad valorem taxes about $45. 00. Whereas, in the 1983-84 fiscal year, Gene's Launder land discharged 1,025,000 gallons of wastewater and paid only $10. 75 in taxes to the Districts. By inclusion in the Industrial Waste Permit Program, the laundromat will pay the Districts a total of $340.47 for its cost of service. Staff Report September 19, 1984 Page 3 c. Water Bills In point 7, Mr. Blaser contends that water bills are personal property and that the owner should not be required to submit them. He also states that the information is available from another source. Staff Response: The Districts request copies of the water bills from users to minimize the costs of administering the program. The information is not privileged and is a matter of public record. The staff agrees with Mr. Blaser that the water information is available elsewhere, however, the Districts would incur additional costs to collect this information. Therefore, users are asked to submit copies of their water usage figures and secured and :.msecured tax information to the Districts, and a net savings in the cost of administering the entire program is thus realized. D. Cost of Permit Fees and Proposition 13 In points 9 and 11 Mr. Blaser . feels that the permit fee is high and that the user fees have not been approved by two-thirds of the people pursuant to Proposition 13. Staff Response: The "Regulations for Use of Districts Sewerage Facilities" (Ordinance) was adopted in 1976 and revised in 1983. The Ordinance sets forth user fees for businesses discharging to the Districts' facilities. Because these are fees and not taxes they are not subject to Proposition 13. The current Class II permit fee of $75. 00 per year is intended to partially offset the costs of administering the permit. Staff Recommendaton to Modify Current Policy: When the Ordinance was revised in 1983 the permittee classifications were restructured. All permits are currently issued for a one year period, although the Ordinance allows permits to be issued for up to three years. After evaluating the need for periodic permit review of the various classes, staff is recommending that the period for Class II (which includes laundromats) and Class III permits be issued regularly for three years instead of one year, and that the current one year fee be established for the three year period. This will -. Staff Report September 19, 1984 Page 4 result in a two-thirds reduction in the work necessary to administer these permits and thus a similar reduction in the effective annual fee. The changes are summarized as follows: CURRENT RECOMMENDED Total Equivalent Term Annual Term Total Annual PERMITTEE Fee Fee Fee Class II 1 vr. $75.00 3 vrs $75.00 $25.00 Class III 1 vr. $50.00 3 vrs $50.00 $16.67 Class I permits would continue to be issued annually because discharges from these permittees require extensive monitoring and analysis and the permit conditions should be reviewed more frequently. No change is recommended for the current Class I fee of $150. 00 per year. E. All Laundry Owners Not Yet Permitted Mr. Blaser points out in 12 that not all laundry owners are presently assessed use fees under the Industrial Waste Permit Program. He also contends that all laundromats should start paying use fees at the same time. Sta ff Response: The issue of equity concerning the assessment of all users of a particular type is a difficult one. Although there is no per feet method that would prov i de instantaneous equity to all, the Boards have concluded that the problem has been approached in a systematic, methodical, and responsible manner, with due consideration to the public mandate to minimize the cost of government that is within our control (see separate Staff Report dated June 19, 1984) • The staff has currently identified over 240 laundromats in Orange County and they are in various stages of the permitting process. Currently 69 coin-operated laundries are permitted and/or have submitted applications for permits and the remaining have been sent questionnaires. Staff Recommendation to Modify Current Policy: Under the current phasing program of identifying dischargers, firms that use in excess of 750, 000 gallons a year, once identified, are immediately permitted if they are subject to the provisions of the Staff Report September 19, 1984 Page 5 Industrial Waste Ordinance. Billing for services commences with the effective date of the permit and invoices are sent out quarterly. This may cause some short-term inequities. As pointed out in the above referenced June 19, 1984 report, delaying the assessment of fees for a particular identified user or class of users would exchange one set of inequities for another. However, the staff believes that the argument that businesses may be placed in an unfair competitive position does have some merit, although the impact would probably be very minimal in most instances as compared to other costs associated with doing business. Therefore, staff recommends that to the extent practicable, permits for users in a giyen classification (i.e., laundromats, car washes, restaurants, etc.) be processed as the users are identified. However, final permit issuance and invoicing would be delayed until enacted simultaneously for all users in a particular class in a given geographical area. The current volume cut-off of 750,000 gallons per year would be used as a guideline rather than an absolute criterion. This procedure should substantially reduce the expressed concern for any relative competitive disadvantage. IW:REF:l25A,B At tachment 1 Page 1 of 2 TO: MRe EDGAR OATt: 8•20·8~ MR. ANDERSON ~R. VON LANGEN SUBJECT: OISTRICT ORDINANCE AS APPLIED TO LAUNDROMATS. I AM PROTESTING "y INCLUSION IN YOUR INOUSTRIAL WASTE PROGRAM FOR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING REASONS• I TRUST YOU WILL SE FAIR ANO UNBIASED IN YOUR REPLY TO gACH OF THE POINTS THAT l A" TRYING TO ~AKE. I HAVE GIVEN THIS ~y LONG ANO SERI9US CONSIOERATION ANO I REALLY FEE~ THAT A~L OF THES£ _POINTS ARE FAIR ANO VALID. 1. LAUNORO"ATS ARE UNIQUE AMONG SEWER USERS IN THAT THEY EXACTLY DUPLICATE THE FUNCTION OF WASHING CLOTHES IN THE HOME ANO THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THE ROUTE THAT .THE WASTEWATER HAS TO TRAVEL TO REACH THE PROCESSING AREA. IN OTHER WOROS THERE IS NO INCREASE IN THE AMOUNT OF WASTEWATER PROCESSED ANO NO INCREASE IN COST TO THE OISTRICTS NO "ATTER WHERE THE WASH WATER IS PUT IN THE SEWER. 2• THE ONLY OTHER CLASS OF BUSINESS THAT DUPLICATES.A FUNCTION OF THE HOME WOULD BE A RESTAURANT. IF YOU EAT OUT THE DISHWATER GOES INTO THE S~WER THERE INSTEAD OF THE SEWER AT HOME. ~. A CAR WASH WOULD NOT BE A VALID ONE FOR CONSIDERATION SINCE IN MOST CASES THE WASHWATER GOES INTO A STOR" DRAIN ANO NOT A SEWER. ~. THE THE~E OF THE ORDINANCE OF THE DISTRICTS IS THAT EVERYONE SHOULD PAY THEIR FAIR ANO PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE COSTS OF OPERATING THE FACILITIES• SINCE EVlRYONE LIVES SOMEWHERE EITHER OWNING OR RENTING WE ALL PAY AO VELOREM TAXES EITHER DIRECTLY O~ INOIRECTLY THROUGH OUR LANOLOROSt WE HAVE ALL PAIO OUR TAXES FOR WASHING OUR CLOTHES. CHARGING A LAUNOROMAT CUSTOHER TWICE FO~ THE SA~E THING CERTAINLY CANNOT BE CONSIOEREO FAIR ANO PROPORTIONATE. 5• SHOULDN'T TH£ LAUNDROMAT CUSTO"ER RECEIVE EQUAL PROTECTION ANO T~EATMENr UNDER THE LAW? JUST BECAUSE HE CHOOSES TO RENT HIS WASHING EQUIPMENT SHOULD NOT PUT HIM AT A UISAUVANTAGE WITH PERSONS WHO OWN THEIR MACHINES ANO WASH AT HOME. ~ .. Attac hment 1 Page 2 of 2 6. A LAUNORO"AT OWNER IS NOT A SINGLE USER OF THE SEWER FACILITIES BUT ONLY A FOCAL POINT FOR MANY S~ALL USERS. IT STATES IN THE ATTACHMENT l THAT YOU SENT TO ~E THAT THE DISTRICTS HAVE DETERMINED ANO THE STATE WATlR RESOURCES CONTROL BOARO HAS AGREED THAf EXISTING AO VELOREM U~ER CHARGES ARE SUFFICIENT. IT OOES NOT STATE THAT HE HAS TO WASH AT HOME TO RECEIVE HIS BENEFIT. 7, WATER BILLS ARE THt PROPERTY OF THE PERSON WHO PAYS THEM ANO ARE VERY VALUABLE SINCE THEY VERIFY VOLUME OF BUSINESS FOR THE OWNER, THE OWNER SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO GIVE THEM UP AS A CONDITION OF USING THE DISTRICTS FACILITIES WHEN THE SAME INFORMATION CAN ~E O~TAINED ELSEWHERE. a. AGAIN THE OV~RRIOING THEME OF THE ORDINANCE IS TO FAIRLY APPORTION THE COSTS OF OPERATIONS ANO IMPOSING A CHARGE BECAUSE A SUSINESS "AKES A PROFIT IS NOT ~ENTIONEO IN THE OROI~ANCE. 9. THIS ORDINANCE WAS ADOPTED IN 1979 AFTER PROP, 13 ANO HAS NOT HAO THE BENEFIT OF A VOTE BY 2/3 OF THE PEOPLE• 10.·THAT PORTION OF MY CUSTO~ERS AO VELORE~ TAXES THAT FAIRLY REPRESENT THEIR COST OF WASHING CLOTHES SHOULD BE CR~OITEO TO ME ANO IF THEY WERE I ESTIMATE THAT YOU WOULO OWE "E MONEY. I CAN SHOW YOU THE CALCULATION IF YOU LIKE. I USEC A FIGURE OF ~S AS THEIR WASHING SHARE. ile WHY IS THE PERMIT FEE SO HIGH7 THE COST OF A VEHICLE REGISTRATION IS ONLY S22e 12. ALL LAUNDRY OWNERS ARE NOT PRESENTLY ASSESSED. IS THAT FAIR FOR SOME TO PAY ANO OTHERS NOT? SHOULDN'T ALL OWNERS BE STARTED AT THE SAME TIME? THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR THQPGHTFUL CONSIDERATION. ·' SINCERLY C H BLASER 8965 GARFIEl.O FOUNTAIN VALLEYtCA June 19, 1984 ~ REF# 029 STAFF REPORT TO: Executive Committee FROM: Industrial Waste Division SUBJECT: High Water Volume Users At the regular Board Meeting of April 11 a non-agenda item was briefly discussed regarding the District's procedures for identifying, permitting, and billing industrial and commercial dischargers. The matter was brought to the Board of Directors by the owner of a coin operated laundry who expressed his belief to the District No. 2 Board of Directors that he is b~ing unfairly charged. Specifically, he complained that he was the only coin laundry in Brea or North Fullerton that was being charge4 sewer use fees. Staff was directed to review the matter and report ~ack to the Boards. The purpose of this staff report is (1) to review the current permitt.ing/billing practices of the District's Industrial Waste Division as they relate to high water volume users, (2) to provide various alternatives to the present prac- tices, and (3) to provide recommendations for future action. The specific contentions of the coin operated laundry owner are addressed in a separate report. REVIEW OF CURRENT PERMITTING/BILLING PRACTICES The District's efforts to identify non-domestic users and to issue permits began in a systemized way in the early 1970's and has continued since the adoption of the Regulations for Use of Districts Sewerage Facilities {Ordinance) in 1976. The main purpose of the permit system is to identify and track industrial users with the potential of discharging toxic, hazardous, or interfering substances that could harm the public, the District's sewerage facilities and operations or the environment. The discharge of these users is monitored and regulated accor~ing to the requirements of the Ordinance. During the early years of the program a staff of 4 office personnel and 4 inspectors began the time consuming process of identifying, permitting, and monitoring those industrial and commercial dischargers capable· of discharging very high water flows (greater than 12,000,000 gallons per year) or discharging the toxic, hazardous, or interfering substances limited by the ordinance. By the end of 1980 the number of discharge permits issued had reached 550. In 1981, because of the increasing emphasis on detecting toxic wastes, the -1- Districts added two industrial waste inspectors and one clerk to improve our monitoring and control efforts. By mid 1982, 650 firms were under permit. Focus remained on control of discharges to the sewer, rather than use fee admi- nistration. In late 1982 staff moved to the next stage, identifying industrial and commer- cial dischargers whose payments to the Districts through ad valorem taxes were insufficient to cover their fair share of the actual costs to convey and treat their volume of wastewater discharge. The basis for having industrial and com- mercial dischargers pay their fair share is the requirement of Federal and State regulations. Attachment 1 is the summary of Federal, State, and Districts' User Fee Regulations. It was determined that a water use rate of 1,000,000 gall9ns or more per year would be an appropriate starting point. The number of users in this size class would presumably be managable using the existing Industrial Waste Division staff and the cut-off of. 1, 000, 000 gallons per year would approximate the break even point ---that is, the point at which dischargers with less than this rate would likely be paying their fair share through property taxes alone. Because of the effect of Proposition 13 and rising operation and maintenance costs, the cut-off for the break-even point may be lower. In the first quarter of 1983, District staff began to manually search the monthly or bi-monthly water billing records of the major water purveyors in our service area. One billing cycle was examined. Water customers whose usage during that particular billing cycle exceeded an equivalent yearly rate of 1,000,000 gallons were listed. Once identified, questionnaires were mailed to approximately 1300.firms (see Attachment 2). The questionnaires allowed us to: 1.) Determine the nature of the user's business (generally only their name is available from the water bill). 2.) Determine how much of the water they purchase is discharged to the sewer and. how much is lost to consumptive use such as landscaping, evaporation, and product make-up. 3.) Determine if a permit is necessary. 4.) Determine if the discharger is paying for the full cost of services. Five hundred questionnaires were returned by the users. After evaluation by District staff, approximately three hundred of the users were determined to be billable dischargers and have, accordingly, been invoiced ever since. This effort and parallel work has increased the present number of industrial and com- mercial permittees (Class I, II, and III-see Attachment 3 for.a description of the classes) to approximately 1100. With the exception of part time temporary help during the summer of 1983, this increase was accomplished with the Industrial Waste Division staffing level first established in 1981 (S office and 6 field inspection staff). All of this was accomplished while maintaining the previous permits and enacting stricter monitoring and enforcement efforts on industry. The approved 1984-85 budget will increase the authorized full time staffing level to 21 employees (7 office and 14 field. employees). The next proposed step is to drop the volume cut-off point from 1, 000, 000 gallons per year to 750,000. -2- ALTERNATIVES TO PRESENT PRACTICES Our effort to permit industrial and commercial enterprises has been an ongoing long-term and gradual process. Staff resources have been limited during the last 8 years in the belief that it was the most cost effective approach to admi- nistering the program. Potential permittees have been identified through: 1.) Building permits; 2.) Telephone book surveys; 3.) Private informational services such as "Contacts Influential"; 4.) Field observations and contacts; 5.) Water billing information. Because of the time consuming process this gradual approach does mean that, during some finite length of time, two users under nearly identical situations may be treated differently until all users have been identified and, where appropriate, permitted. --- The following alternatives could be utilized: Delay Invoicing Any High Water Volume User Until All Users Are Identified - This approach would theoretically mean that all users would be treated in exactly the same way. However, this alternative would not necessarily produce equity. Today, many users are paying widely disparate amounts to the Districts through their ad valorem taxes, and many are not paying their fair share through the ad valorem taxes. Therefore, inequities will continue until the entire user base in Orange County is placed under permit. Our delaying permitting and invoicing will result in trading one set of inequities for another. In the meantime the revenue that we would otherwise receive would be lost. Further, we would be in violation of the Revenue Program adopted by the Boards in compliance with Federal requirements. During Fiscal Year 1983-84 we will receive between $4.5 and $5.5 million from industrial and commercial user surcharges and $1.0 million in ad valorem taxes. Of that, the revenue from the high volume users under permit in the 1,000,000. to 12,000,000 gallon per year class is estimated to be ten percent of the total amount. A major drawback of this alternative, of course, is that it could take several years to identify and permit the entire user base estimated to be between 5,000 and 22,000 establishments. Search For Potential Permittees By District, City Or.Other Zone Type - Under this approach District staff would conduct an intensive effort in a par- ticular geographical area so that all users· in the area would be placed under permit. at the same time. This alternative basically has the same inequities as our existing method except that it would be. based on location rather than volume, ; ·-. -3- '•'. _ .. Search For Potential Permittees By Industrial Type- Under this approach District staff would conduct an intensive effort on a par- . ticular industrial or commercial type based on Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code. For instance, all of the coin operated laundries could be sought out. This approach has two basic shortcomings. First, the selection of a particular user group is discriminatory because there is no basis for selecting a particular group, with the exception of giving high priority to firms that discharge potentially harmful substances to the system. Second, there is no adequate data base for finding particular user groups. Subscription informational services such as Contacts Influential do not provide a comprehen- sive· listing of Districts' users for many standard i~dustrial classifications. For instance, they identify only 67 coin laundries in Orange County. Water billing or business license information cannot normally be computer accessed by user type by most of the purveyors or licensing entities. Furthermore, Standard Industrial Classification is not usually available from the water billing or business license data. RECOMMENDED FUTURE ACTIONS 1. That permitting and invoicing should begin when high water users are iden- tified as billable users based on predetermined criteria, {continuation of the current practice) as follows: a) That the most appropriate way to systematically search for high water - dischargers is to continue to use the criteria of high water use applied across the entire industrial and commercial base of the District's service area. (Our current action level of 1, 000, 000 gallons per year or more for investigating water users has resulted in the issuance of 300 new use permits over the previous cut-off of 12,000,000 gallons.) b) That the cut-off level now be dropped to 750,000 gallons per year to identify the next group of potential permittees and require them to pay their fair share. 2. a) That the water purveyor survey currently underway {see Attachment 4) be continued so that the Districts can determine what computer cap.a- bilities the purveyors have, and what computer capabilities they can develop to assist the Districts. This information is necessary to understand how the screening process can be made more effective. b) That the Districts investigate the feasibility of entering service contracts with the various water purveyors to develop computerized data searching capabilities. The early returns from the water pur- veyor survey indicate that many of them cannot presently meet our need. Costs of this service may vary dramatically among purveyors. Assuming a cost of $2500 to $5000 and a need for between 15 and 20 systems, a total cost of between $37,500 and $100,000 is estimated. However, it would greatly enhance our ability to identify firms sub- ject to the Districts' Use Ordinance and speed up the entire process. -4- 3. The 1984-85 budget approved by the Boards this month adds six positions (4 clerical and 2 inspection) to the Industrial Waste Staff. The four cleri- cal staff will be used to accelerate our efforts to identify, permit, and begin to invoice those users whose ad valorem taxes do not offset the actual cost to the Districts to convey, treat, and dispose of their sewage discharge. One full-time Clerk and two part-time Assistants will be hired to provide year round field .visits to all water purveyors and field iden- tification of potential permittees. They will collect the data from the water billing records and transmit that information to the Industrial Waste Division office staff. One full-time Clerk will also be hired to send out the Wastewater Discharge Questionnaires, follow-up on additional infor- mational data when necessary, issue the permit, and coordinate invoicing efforts with the Districts' Accounting Division. The two added Industrial Waste Inspectors that will be hired during the year will be assigned to enforce the categorical pretreatment standards mandated by EPA and will not be involved in identifying new permittees. 4. That after nine months (March, 1985) of experience in administering the program in this manner a follow-up staff report be submitted to the· Executive Committee. The report would evaluate the· effectiveness of the accelerated program and would provide recommendations for future actions. The additional permits, invoices, and potential collections problems may require an additional accounting clerk and computerized data management. -5- ·. ATTACHMENT 1 SUMMARY OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND DISTRICTS' USER FEE REGULATIONS Section 204 (b) ( 1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, corresponding California legislation in the State Water Code, and the administrative regula- tions implementing these legislative actions require that all user classes shall pay their proportionate share of the actual costs of operating and maintaining the Districts' sewerage system. In April, 1979, the Boards of Directors adopted a Revenue Program for the Districts, as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, which defines the structure and basis of the charges paid by all system users. The Districts' Revenue Program incorporates these Federal and State regulatory mandates which govern establishment of user charges. This program provides for two sources of funds to pay the operations and maintenance (O & M) costs of the Dist,;.i cts: 0 0 Ad Valorem taxes (as defined in EPA Regulations CFR 35.2140 (b)(2)) Surcharge for those non-residential, high-volume and/or high-strength dischargers whose ad valorem tax contributions are inadequate to pay their proportionate share of the Districts' 0 & M costs (as defined in EPA Regulation CFR 35.2140 (b)(3)). The Districts have determined, and the State Water Re s ources Control Board has agreed, that our existing ad valorem user charge system allocates a propor- tionate share of the Districts' 0 & M costs to the residential and small non- residential user class. All other us ers of the system are subject to be permitted by the Industrial Waste Division, and must pay a surcharge (direct user charge) based upon the volume of wastewater discharged and the strength of the pollutants in the wastewater as evidenced by the amount of suspended solids (SS) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) found in their discharge. Further, any firm that discharges specified pollutants (heavy metals, toxics) regardless of volume, is subject to permitting and monitoring. These users receive a credit against their quarterly user charge for the ad valorem taxes they pay to the Districts. Each District establishes user charge rates for their industrial dischargers on an annual basis after adoption of the budget in July of each fiscal year. The 1983-84 annual industrial user fees for the seven Districts is: Flow: $346.83 -$249.35 per million gallons Suspended Solids: Biochemical Oxygen Demand: 51.44 per thousand pounds 58.15 per thousand pounds • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0 . BOX 8127 . FOUNTAIN VALLE Y, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE !EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAYJ ATTACliMENT 2 The Connty Sanitation Districts of Orange County, since 1970, have been permitti~g and collecting user charges from those dischargers whose taxes on the Ad Valore:n (?roperty Tax) bill are not sufficient to pay ~he costs for treating and disposing of their wastewater discharged to the sewe:. The Districts have identified your building as possibly being one that fal:s in the aforementioned category. The costs of t reating wastewater is computed by determining the •;olume a nd st.:ength cf the discharge. Ger.erally, the amount from the City water meter less 5% (for landscaping, evaporation, etc .), is assumed to be the amount that is discharged to the sewer. Because of the large number of users in the Districts service area, it is impractical to test every wastewater discharge for its constituents. Therefore, unless shown other~ise by the user, the strength of wastewater is assumed to be 250 ppm for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and ZSO ppm for suspendec solids. T!iese numbers approximate the strength of domestic waste . Afte: the user charge ~as been computed, the tax collected through the ad valorem taxes are c:edited against the user charge. T!ie deficit is then charged against the user. !n o~der for the Districts to ?roperly calculate the amount of water you discharge to the sewer, it is necessary tc complete the enclosed appli- cation and return it within two (2) weeks. If the application is not returned, the District3 will assume all water purchased is di scharged tc the sewerage system. TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Page Two F i scal year average user charges are as follows: Flow $/Million Gallons $ Suspended Solids $/1000 lbs . $ B.O.D. $/1000 lbs. $ I t is the Districts' intent to collect all charges that are due. I f you have any questions, please contact Jim Wybenga in the Industrial Waste Division, 540-2910, Ext. 253. /km Enc l osure Blake P. Anderson Director of Operations 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ?. O. SOX 8127. F"OUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIF'CRNIA 92708 10844 EL.LIS AVENUE ( E:UCLJD CF"F'·RAMF'. S AN DIEGO F"REE:WAY) WASIDIAlER DIS~ QLESTI~N4If£ NOTE TO SIGNING OFFICAL: Please complete all sections of this questionaire, attaching additional sheets as necessary, for c ompletion of any section. Should any questions arise concerning this application, p l ease contact the Industrial Waste Division. SECTION A - 1. Business or Building Name Mailing Address : 2 . Service Address: City Zip Phone 3 . Brief desC"ripti on of service activity at premises 4. Assessor Parcel Numbers and addresses for all parcels owned and/or TEL.E,.HON CS: AREA CCCI: 7l' 5 40•291 c 962-2411 occupied b y the business or building ________________________________ __ S. Water Account Numbers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SECTI ON B - 1. Landscaped area in square feet --------------------------------------------- 2 . Tons of Cooling Tower capacity ------------------------------------------- 3. Is there any other areas where significant water evaporation can occur? (Explain) __________________________________________________ __ .• , Name, title, and telephone number of person to c ontact concerning information provided in this questionnaire . (Please print) Name Title Phone I affirm that all information in this questionnaire is accurate to the best of my knowledge . Title CLASS I ATTACHMENT 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REGULATIONS FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, JULY 1, 1983 DESCRIPTION OF USER PERMITS 1. Has a discharge flow of 50,000 gallons or more per normal working day or 12 million gallons or more per year; 2. Involves the discharge of wastewater which may contain at any given time, any of the components as specified in Section 204, Limitations on Radioactive Wastes, or Section 208, Limitations on Wastewater Strength; or, 3. Is subject to final Federal categorical pretreatment standards. CLASS II 1 . Bas a discharge flow of less than 50,000 gallons per normal working day or 12 million gallons or less per year; 2. Has a charge for use greater than the ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District, exclusive of debt service; and, 3 . Is not otherwise required to obtain a Class I permit. CLASS III 1. Has a discharge flow of less than 50,000 gallons per normal working day or 12 million gallons or less per year; 2. Has a discharge consisting of only sanitary waste at a presumed domestic waste equivalent (B.O.D. and suspended solids of 250 milligrams per liter); 3. Has a charge for use greater than the ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District, exclusive of debt service; and, 4. Is not otherwise required to obtain a Class I or II permit. - . COUNTY · SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P . 0 . SOX 8127. F'OUNTAIN VAl..L.EY. CAl..I F'ORNIA 92708 10844 ELL.IS AVENUE: {EUCLI D OF'F'·RAMP. SAN DIEGO F'REEWAY ) Apri .1 5, 1984 REFI 518 • ATTENTION: SUBJECT: ATTACHME NT 4 Water Depart~ent Managers User Survey T £L.£1"MON l!:S: AIU:.A CCOE 714 540-2910 962-241 1 Tiie County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) are initiating a survey to ascertain the capabilities of the numerous water purveyors in the County to supply the name~ of their customers using in excess of 750,000 ga l lons per year (100,000 cubic feet per .year). Tiie . District's current practice for identifying new high volume 111astewater discharge permittees is to visit each ·water purveyor. Districts emp l oyees manually review the billing records of the purveyor ta find high water users. The Districts subsequently contact the user to detennine if a di scharge permit is required. This procedure is extremely inefficient and delays us from iden- tifying new permittees. Therefore, we are conducting this survey to detennine your record search i ng capabi l ities. Please complete the attached survey form and return it to the Districts i n the enclosed envelope. Your cooperation will aid the Districts in its efforts to establish a comprehensive County-wide ·11astewater discharge penni t program. If you have any questions, please contact BPA/de Enclosure Blake P. Anderson Director of Operations 253. - WATER PURVEYOR SURVEY FORM Date: Name of person completing form: Please answer the following questions as accurately as possible: 2 .) Estimated number of customers using in excess of 100,000 cubic feet per year 3 .) Is your agency computerized? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- 4 .) Do you have the capability to search your files according to volume .._, purchased? ·5.) Are you willing to supply the Districts with a computer printout of the high water users? 6.) What is the cost of providing this service? 7.) Are there any comments your agency wishes to make? • \ RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS OCTOBER lOJ 1984 -7:30 P.M. ::: )> I I-' ::: I ~- '. J ! ( I 1 '. ( ( ::.:c:. G') ·rn :z: ( .. t=I ,)> ~ ···--1 ,.·rn 3 l 1 I ·=?t: I .'Oo ; ; I )> . I ~1 i··r- '· i., t::J ~ I:......,. l ( ; I(/') l : '--f. l ! "'::::C . : ....... :. i·!n ; '--f !·':(/) ; . ·, I .t •i I ! .. 1 ,· [,' I I .... , !11 ! ' ( FUND NO WARRANT NO. .'.!:J· .1 I ... 'I-' 070~8,., 070681 070682 070683 070Ult 070685 070686 07C687 no6ee 070689 070690 07G£91 07CE92 070693 n106~" 070695 070696 07G697 670698 070699 U707CG 070701 G7G702 0707C3 C70704 070705 070706 &76707 070708 070709 070710 070711 070712 070713 0707H 070715 070716 07 0 717 070718 070719 070720. 370721 070722 070723 07 072'f &76725 ::: .. ( 9199 • JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/30/84 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATJON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR ABC HETALS SUPPLYt INC. ADVANCO CCNSTRUCTORSt INC. AIR FRODUCTS & CHEMlCALSt INC. ALLIS•CHALMERS CORP. AMERIC•N •IR FILTERt INC. AHERJCA~ TECHNIC•L SUPFLY ANAHEI~ BUSINESS MACHINES THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. ANGELICA HEALTHCARE SERVICES AQUA BEN CORP. ARCO GLASS & MIRROR ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES AUTO SHOP EQUIPHENT CO. BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLYt INC. BAKER EGUIPHENT R£NTALS BENZ ENGllEERJNGt INC. -BEVCO eoHAR ffAGNETO SERVICE, INC • BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP w.r. BROOKE THE BURKE COHPANY BUTIER ENGl~EERING, INC. C & fl-RECC~DITIONING CO. CPT CALIFORNIA, INC. CALIF. ASSOC• OF SAN. AGENCIES CAL SWITCH. CARHENllA FORD TRUCK SALES, IN JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS CHEVRON u.s.A., INC. COMPRESSOR & INDUSTRIAL CONROCK CCHf'ANY CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. CONTINE~TAL CHEMICAL CO COOPER ENERGY SERVICES COSTA MESA AUTO PARTS, INC. CAL CONSOLIDATED WATER DHE, I NC• O•VALS SALES COHFA~Y DAYTON FOlNDRY DECO DELTA ANALYTICAL DIV. DONAHUE & co., INC. DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. DUMAS DIESEL INJECTION DUNN EDWARDS CORP. EASTHANt INC. ClAIHS PAID 09/05/8~ · AMOUNT S3t202e 71 -Slt324t267e21 S384e32 S91.61 $407.54 Sl8e55 S253.34 S349• 80 -·· - S626.33 S28t869e97 DESCRIPTION STEEL STOCK CONtRACTOR P2-25-2 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MACHINES PIPE SUPPLIES · S84 0 e54 · ·· ·--· ·-·· -- S3t255e00 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT CHEMICAL COAGULANTS GLASS LAB ANALYSIS $190.00 ·$726ao\7 ·· Sl54.00 $124.83 $325· 01 -. ·-· $667.25 S7t689.00 --· S9o\e92 · S69e74 ss.oe2.oo soo.oo S739•01 s510.oo $59.74-·: $176.62 S2t957.23 $41700.28 S'\22.50 $617.20 Slt't87.36 Slt998e10 S81f3.05 $693.11 $98.60 $105.17 S36e9lt Slt62G.98 $369.51 S716.38 s2.ooo.oo $296.66 Slt 772.15 $153.66 Slt154.49 TRUCK PARTS SHALL-HARDWARE TOOL RENTAL ENGINE PARTS ELECTRIC CART PARTS ENGINE PARTS ENGR. 7-2C-4 EMPLOYEE HI LEAGE SHALL HARDWARE CONSTRUCTION HANAGEHENT P2-23, P2-24 . ..... PUHP. REPAIRS .. . ... -· .. . . . . WORD PROCESSING HAINTENANCE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION ·· WIRE ·· · · -· .,_ TRUCK PARTS ENGR. P2-25-2 ENGINE OIL COMPRESSOR PARTS BUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CHLORINE ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS RESIN TANK EXCHANGE ENGINE PARTS PI PE SUPPLIES · CHAIN ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES, LAB SUPPLIES APPRAISAL SERVICE PW-131 REPAIRS ENGINE PARTS PAINT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES ( _, ! : ·' : ··; .. 1 'I L ·: .,-' ; .. : i : i . """ 1 j ti .., . :: :t> I N :: ,· r· Iii ,. l I; i !'; i .. ,,, 1 J-1 !'I .I •. .... I j I., j:;. Cii> r,11 :z t=' J?> ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, , :t>. I rr:-i ti=' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I Cj") ~ , . ~:. ,,.: I. h i. i., i· 1· ! ;1. I .i I ' :" . :ft ~f":..) :: ,,,.. I ' l .. FUND NO WARRANT NO. 070726 070727 07(Jl28 070729 070730 070731 070732 07C733 07073~ 070735 070736 070737 D7C738 070739 070HO ~70741 070742 Cl70H3 07 0 74q G70745 070H6 070747 C707't8 070H9 07075(; 070751 07C752 0707~3 07 Cl751f 070755 07(1756 070757 070758 Oln75CJ 070760 070761 070762 070763 ft7076,. 07C765 070766 070767 070768 07076CJ 070770 Olr.771 ( . ·---·-· -··---------·· ----··----·-.... -·-··---·--.. -··--··--. ·-·-------· ---··---·-----· --· ---· ·····-·-····· .. ·····-... --··--·-·""·--··-_.,_ -. ·-· -· 91CJ9 -JT DIST VORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/30/8~ PAGE 2 RrPORT NUMBER APlf3 COUNTY SANITATJON··DISTRl~TS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR · ENCHANTERt INC. FALCON OISFOSAL SERVICE FEDERAL E•PRESS CORP. FISCHER & PORTER co. FISHER CO~TROLS CO. FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. FLOYD-KORDICKt J.V. FORD TRUCK SALVAGE CITY OF FCUNTAIN VALLEY FROST E~Gl~EERING SERVICES co. JUL 1 E GARNER .. . .. ---. GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. GIERLICH-"ITCHELlt INC. GREAT PACIFIC EOUIP"ENT CO. ·· JEAN GRIGG LARRY HALL•S HARRINGTO~ INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS HOUSE OF BATTERIES ~oS. HUGHES co., INCo HUNDLEY CO"PANY, INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTO~ BEACH RUBBER STAMP HhNTINGTON SUPPLY · IRD ~ERCHANALYSIS INDUSTRIAL ~SPHALT lhOUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS INGRAH PAFER B.P. JOHN HAULING JOSLYN MFG. & SUPPLY CO. - 1<.c.c. COf'PANY KELLY PIPE CO. KING BEARING, INC. · L •Bow. S •, I NC• LA HOTTE CHEMICAL FRODUCTS H.v. LAWN~ASTER & COt INC. LAWSON PRCDUCT~t INC. LERNER PHOTO, INC. LIGHTING CISTRIBUTORS, INC. LIQUID AIR CORr. THE CHARLES LOW£ CO. LYONS l~T'L SECURITYe INC. Melol• SEA GRANT PROGRAM H4RVAC ELECTRONICS MCCOOK PUHP '-C1<£SSON C~EMICAL CO. '-CKl~LEY CGUIPHENT CORF CLAIMS PAID 09/05/84 ·AMOUNT -· ---·· ·-... · ··-·--· --· ·~ DESCRIPTION .. S3t5DO.OO OCEAN MONITORING S53t510e57 SLUDGE· HAULING ANO DISPOSAL s12.as DELIVERY SERVICE S3t336e93 PIPE SUPPLIES, ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES .. -· -... · ·-· S66e33 -------.. -REGULATOR PARTS S65.85 LAB CHEMICALS S53t833e95 CONTRACTOR PW-132 S636e00· -·-.. TRUCK PARTS S766.~3 WATER USEAGE S168.71 VALVES S5l.66 .. ·-.......... EHPLOYEE HILEAGE S53 •• 37 TELEPHONE S31t055.88 FILTER PRESS BELTS $993.39 FLOW HETER PARTS S32.60 EHPLOYEE MILEAGE S265.00 TRUCK REPAIRS $166 • 75 ... -· .. · SHAU;-HARDWARE · .. ·-· -· · -· S307e13 BATTERIE·s S612.23 PAINT SUPPLIES, SAFETY SUPPLIES .... S2 t525• 03 · ... ·· ·· ... ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES S9t173.06 WATER USEAGE S3•.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES --·-.. -·--·-· ---.. --sso. 75 .. ··· ---·----·SHALL· HARDWARE .. · · ....... · · ·--·--.. · S165.00 SEHINAR REGISTRATION 130.51 BUILDING HATERIALS S293.96 .. · SHALL HARDWARE · S2t077.21f JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Slt916.48 WOOD SHAVINGS Sl59e00 TRUCK PARTS S64t507.27 CONTRACTOR 3-2~-1 S693.64 PIPE SUPPLIES S4t353.98 ·BEARING SUPPLIES St,446.62 WELDING SUPPLIES S237.22 LAB SUPPLIES Slt327e05 TESTING 3-24-1; PW-123 $758.57 SHALL HARDWARE $17.64 FILH PROCESSING 1329.05 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1279.80 WELDING SUPPLIES Sl79e62 PUHP PARTS S666i00 PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL 1105.00 PUBLICATIONS S81.6l LAB SUPPLIES, ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $99995.80 PUHP PARTS S4t923.70· LAB CHEHICALS 123.79 ENGINE ~ARTS ( ·--·· . --· ( -:·; 1'! i.r-,. !·; _J . ~' i I"' ; . I: ,: :•. I , .. : .. , ) l·'..c .. :::: )> I \.N :::: .... f· ,. ! !, '·' J> G"> rn 2 tLj )> :···· ( ......... ~ rt1 '~ ~· : i )> 'F ,· t::1 .......... (/) ~ :::::c .__. h H (/) l) ' j,:· ( I:.:: . I I· I l !~·:; t .. :: ( fr \.J.J • I ::::-.-I. • t·' ~. ( FUND NO WARRANT NO. 070772 070773 070774 070775 070776 C70777 070778 070779 07&780 OH781 070722 ll707E3 070784 070785 (;707~6 070787 070788 070789 070790 070791 0101c;2 070793 £J7 079'1 07C795 C70796 070797 076758 670799 070800 070801 d70A02 070803 07080'1 071)805 070806 070807 3H8t'J8 076809 070810 07C811 070812 070813 07081'1 G70815 070816 070817 ( q199 -JT DIST WCRKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/30/81f PAGE REPORT NUHBER APlf3 3 COUNTY SANITATION· DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR METRO TOXICANT PROG~AH MILLER DR-PERY SERVICE HORRISON CO. HOTOROLA• INC. NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH NOROSON CCRPORATION OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. · OLYHFIC CHEMICAL CO. ONE DAY P-INT & eoov ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. OXYGEN SERVICE CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTROLR COUNTY SA~IlATJON DISTRICT PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT-CO. PACIFIC BELL PARAMOUNT HETAL & SUPPLY INC. FARTS UNLIMITED FASCAL & LUDWIG PEATt '-AR~ICK. MITCHELL & CO. PERFORr.ANCE SPECIALISTS PEROXIDAllON SYSTEHSt INC. POSTMASTER HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE ~IKE PRLICH & SONS PROGRESSIVE STEEL SUPPLY THE REGIS lER THE REGISTER REXNORD ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS RIFULLER SERVICES RYAN•HEPCC S & J CHE VROL(T SAN CON INC. SANTA ANA DODGF SANTA ANA ELECTRIC ~OTORS SEE OPTICS SENSOREXt INC. SERPENTJX CONVFYOR CORP. SHAMROCK SUPPLY SHJTH-EHERY co. SO. CALIF. COASTAL WATER SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. SO. CALIF. WATER CO. SOUTHERN COUNTIES Oil CQ. CLAl"S PAID 09/05/8'1 AMOUNT S18elf5 · S867.08 S377.36 S16t132.H S90.00 S51.30 SJH.67 $6• 719e l7 S28t661.53 5289.98 .. S26e50 suo.oo SUlf.78 SlU.87 S67t31f Oe00 S5t018el3 S11267e53 · · · · UlfO.H S2t8't8e30 -· _ ..... Slt98e08 · . S82t930.lf7 S5t978.00 $2 t589. 02 . SJ.152.61 $2 t ooo. 00 S3il.OO S21ft365e25 $8,.2.75 '283.92 S275.52 S505.97 S50o.oo S126. H $128.60 S60t91f8.78 S587.05 S2t853.60 $613.00 '100.lfO $780.68 s2.212.69 s12a.o·o u tl50. 00 $23~'.996.13 $8.97 S15 t U2 .29 DESCRIPTION INDUSTRIAL WASTE PUBLICATION DRAPERIES PIPE SUPPLIES CONTROL & COHHUNICATIONS EQUIPHENT TRAINING SEHINAR WATER USEAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CAUSTIC SODA CHLORINE TRUCK REPAIRS LAB CHEHICALS FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECTION PIPE SUPPLIES SPECIALTY GASES COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES REIHBURSE WORKERS 1 COHP. FUND ·-SAFETY SUPPLIES, FIRST AID SUPPLIES TELEHETER I NG PW-115 RETENTION ·TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR P2-26, PW-123 RETENTION 1983-8~ ANNUAL AUDIT TRUCK REPAIRS HYDROGEN PEROXIDE POSTAGE INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAHPLING-ICE CONTRACTOR 3-28R STEEL STOCK CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING. LEGAL ADVERTISING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTROL EQUIPMENT PIPE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR l-2R-2,J · TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS SAFETY GLASSES SHALL HARDWARE STEEL STOCK TOOLS• SHALL HARDWARE. TESTING P2-26, P2-25-2 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY POWER ... WATER USEAGE DIESEL F~EL ( , .. l ! ) i ! . 't . i H :. j i'' l"'j H) . ' <.~ .. ,, :' : .. J ., ::: :I> I ..i=-::: r:r····. FUND NO :··1 j·, H I I ;·.r ... MARRAtH NO. 070818 , .. D70lH9 11 '1 G70620 I :·~ 070821 'Ci> 070822 ,..,, 070823 ;.:;z «n0624 't=j . :::t::a 070825 !'! 070A2E. ;,...,_. 070627 ;.Lt 07c.828 1.rn ·3 OH829 I< 070830 1. c:i:t: 070831 ;.~ 070832 '·•I 070833 . :•I 07 083'f i ):::a 070835 ·• 070836 :r- 070837 I t:::j 070838 : t:'-4 070839 . (/') 'J70840 . r-i ~ ::::c ;......,. i'(I !~ !(/) r ~ '. I . .. -.. ~ ~ ( ! H ( 1:1! !..' i. , I h j..: j ... ::: 1)> (. .· t ,".J::-:·· .. ::: ... .. i '·' ( 9199 -JT DIST YCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/30/84 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ·· ... · VENDOR · SPEEDE SPEEDOMETER DENNIS STEPHENSON SUPER CHEM CORP THE SUPPLIERS J. MAYNE SYLVESTER TAYLOR•OUl\N F.H. THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING THOR TEMPORARY SERVICES . TRAVEL TRAVEL TROPJCANA APARTMENTS TRUCK & ALTO SUPPLY• INC. J.G. TUCKER & SON, INC. FRANK ULTIMO UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED STATES SAFE DEPOSIT CO VUR SCIENTIFIC VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. VAR EC 11 INC• CLAIHS PAID 09/05/84 ... -···· ·AMOUNT· · · --· -· ·-· ··· OESCR IPTION · S83.62 TRUCK REPAIRS $15.99 EHPLOYEE HILEAGE ~552e83 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES S2e50•.89 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES, TOOLS S21238.91 · ··· ·· PETTY· CASH RE I HBURSEHENT ·· sieOlO.i3 ELECTRIC CART PARTS $31454.05 AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES ·· Sl64 .69 ·· ·-· · · TEHPORARY HELP S652.0G AIR FARE S595.38. USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT --·· Sl 1830.65 -··' ... -· ··· TRUCK PARTS S857.43 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $21057.84 PW-112 RETENTION ·· · ·· S37e30 DELIVERY SERVICE S828.00 DISC PACK SERVICE S739e67 LAB SUPPLIES Sle885.92 · ·· ·PIPE SUPPLIES Sl.068.48 LAB SUPPLIES $70.72 ENGINE PARTS ·-S973e55 ··ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 4 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP WHITE, fl~E & VERVILLE EVERETT He YORK CO. s1.eo1.04 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY S365.70 ENGINE PARTS ZIP TEMPORARY PERSONNEL ·· S609. 96 -··· ·--·-·--·TEMPORARY HELP TOTAL CLAIMS·PAIO 09/05/84· . 12.2591388.12 ..... .. . -..... . ---------------------------------- ( (~ i I I j I ,·~ ~I'. ., ) ) _) I ., .I ) . _, ;:·J ~ !, ... I (•.i 1'• ::: )> I \.n ::: 1,' ~ ~ L_y .j r t •• ! { I I. !· h :,·l> 'G) ,··rn ~··2 ; . t::::9 !"')> ;''l-r--1 :'"rn 1'3 ! I :'j~ . :.oo . I ! )> ' i·I I r- 1 •. ( !; . t::::j ··-i'"C/) ,··-I ; ::::a l . .'t--t ! \') i'"--1 .. ;en ! . : ' i i· 1;:1; l ;·· ( ti I '' ! .; ::: ;, 1:J:::a I ... ~\.n ::: ....... ( FUND_~~. ,19~ .-_ ~r .. DJ~I .. W~R~l.NG_C_~~~!~J ... SUHHARV #1 OPER FUND 111 ACO FUND 12 OPER FUND #2 ACO FUND #3 OPER FUND iJ3 ACO FUND 13 F/R FUND #5 OPER FUND 1J5 ACO FUND #6 OPER FUND 16 ACO FUND i7 OPER FUND #7 ACO FUND 17 F/R FUND #ii OPER FUND #11 ACO FUND 85&6 OPER FUND #6&7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SEL~ FUN~E6 WOR~~~si COHP. JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND iNSURANCE FUND ( PROCESSING DATE 8/30/8~ .. ·-··· -····--···.. ... . ·--·-... -..... --.... ___ ,,,_ .. ---~--RrPof\t HUH8ER APltl ---.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . CLAl~S PAID ~'/O~/~'· $ AMOUNT 602.66 2,11to.oo ·1,01~L 51 5,459.00 533. 18 46~12Lj5 65,538.67 3,578.lt3 ·j,886.oo ..... · -.. -.. -·· - 32.78 7,221.50 i '59'· .... 5,926.00 7,689.00 ... -. . 73. 18 ... -----... -· 13,226.So 26.20 "• .. 1 ~. 62 ... -- 529, 798. 51 __ ......... ~ ,5o~.~~86~H ... ____ -.. --···· 5,01 .13 53, 789. 75. $2,259,388.12 ( PAGE 5 :'1 'I :._jJ ... , !·l . .;'.! •' 1,.: :.· "• : '.i 1' ·! : ) ..~: ,If '·..J • =: t:d I I-& =: ('; 1:i ,•,• :t> en r.11 e3 J> t·.· h ~ ni E: ~ r :;i:r: 90 :·,1 I :J> r.-r.- t::;:j ........ (I') ~ ~ 0 ((.) ! . ! . I i.:-. I.' I ' •• j I. • I , .... .- !;:;: ~ ~ . =: I ... . FUND NO WARRANT NO. 070861 070662 n7CP63 070£164 07"865 079866 C70tt67 07U868 'J70669 07 f'.'87(, !)70871 070872 1)7 0873 079R74 070e75 07(1876 0701:'77 IHU878 070879 070~60 070881 370882 l\70883 0708P.4 07C885 070886 aBee1 970888 0708~9 070890 070£.91 OH892 ~70893 07 OR91f l'70895 t'H896 070897 07De98 ~l~B99 070900 1)71)901 070'302 07t903 no904 07tl91)5 070906 ( 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL -··· -· -· · .... ·-·· ··-· PROCESSING DATE 9/Jlt/8't ·PAGE.· REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF O~ANG£ COUNTY VfNOOR A-J INSTITUTIONAL EOUIP• COa A. H. Fa VOIT AIR FRODUCTS & CHEHJCALS,JNCo ALL-STATE VEHICLES, INC. ALLJS•CHALH£RS CORP. AHEPICAN COMPRESSOR PAPTS AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAP~ AMETEKt l~C. ANA~EIH SEWER CONSTPUCllON THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. AQUA BCN CORP. ARCO GLASS & MIRROR ARROW-RISCO, INC. PANDOLPH 4USTIN COa 8&B TRUCKS eAKER PLYVOOD co., INC. BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO. eECKHAN INDUSTRIAL BCCKMAN INOUSTRJAL L.W. BEMIS TRACTOR & IHPL(MENT BEVCO 61E~LY & ASSOCIATES, l~C. BIG BO~ RENTAL COa eoa•s RADIATOR BR1STOL PARK MEDICAL G~P., INC THf BURKE COMPANY CPT C4LIFORNIAt I~C. CAL-PARTITIONSt INC. CARCO, INC. CARLSON MACHINE co. CHA~L(S w. CART£R CO. CHESTERTON lOS ANGELES CONNELL CHEVROLET CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. CONSOLIDATEV R~PRODUCTIONS CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO CONTINENTAL RADIATO~ COOPER ENERGY SERVICES COSTA HESA AUTO PARTS; INC. CAL CONSOLIDATED MATER STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFOQNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA DAILY PILOT CLAIMS PAID 09/19/84 AMOUNT Sl t241 e63 Slt164a'.53 st?CJ•3? $11498.10 $4 .12·J.52 S1 tft4't.'l0 UH.00 S39277.00 · S2t60•h 00 S8'59.26 S23t624a57 $63.60 S39.53 S28t465a50 S2t659•1C \930.32 S65a74 Sl;21,.51 $1, 166. 00 $99.64 · Sl t2S9e25 S550.'J0 Sl1545.l'> $11.!).84 $78.')0 $115.58 S163.20 st0.465.98 st, o31. s~ S~t672.:>0 s11. 01 $21.87 $26.34 $2,967.32 Sl t'479. 7R S3~'S81a40 ( S2tl8a 8~ 1~13.61 $389.00 s2s1. os· \l6fJ.O'l Sl6'J.~O st6tt. :.to !ttlJ"· 00 S16Ci1JO st8.2(1 DfSCRIPTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT -·SPECIALTY GASES VEHICLE tEASE PUMP PARTS COMPRESSOR PARTS ALARM SYSTEH MAINTENANCE HEAT EXCHANGER csooc-17 MANHOLE REPAIRS ENGINE PARTS CHEMICAL COAGULANTS GLASS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUHP PARTS TRUCK PARTS LUMBER PUBLICATION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC CART PARTS WORKERS: COMP. AOHINISTRATOR TRASH DISPOSAL TRUCK REPAIRS PRE EHPLOVHENT EXAMS ENGINE PARTS WORD PROCESSING MAINTENANCE OFFICE PARTITIONS TRUCK PARTS CHAIN PI PE SUPPLIES FREIGHT TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION CHLORINE TRUCK REPAIRS ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS WATER SOFTENER RENTAL. RESIN TANK EXCHANGE ANNEXATION 12-19 PROCESSING FEE ANNEXATION #2-25 PROCESSING FEE ANNEXATION 12-29 PROCESSING FEE ANNEXATION #2-59 PROCESSING FEE ANNEXATION #2-36 PROCESSING FEE LEGAL ADVERTISING ( ; ' ., I .. :) t: ;.; ) f ,: ) r:· I'· ·' •• •• •i j ::: tc I N ::: · FUND NO I''.[ .. ( lj,- I·' !,1 l.j WARRANT NO. :.r-. 1·1 070907 1 ··:1 070908 ;l i l:=r· -:~~:~: !, b> 070911 '·en 010912 · f :, (Tl ~7:>913 ':z . ,. t::::J 0 7() 9 llf ' i·.LJ> C7 C915 · - • f ... j 1)7 (1916 ; ......... 073917 ;' ·-1. P.70918 1 ( r:~ 070919 ; i:: 070920 .. '=it: 07C921 : 1 i.JOO 070922 . : .1 , 070923 I : ·· ··-· 070924 · ·· i.:x> 070925 I .I e70926 1 ~:i:-. 07t''?27 l j:.!t=j C7 0928 !'..,I....... 07 9929 I . '(./) . Q 7 0 9 3 0 . ! 1·'-t ! I -.-::::a 0 7 !) 931 I I"'....... 070 932 ~ .) :.:n· o7'J93l ;H 0709M (:(/) 07.0°35 1 ·1 7 i ,. ~H936 '.·.! 070937 l,.i 070938 ,,.; CH0939 •. ,I 0709'10 I'! 0709/tl I !,; ;(' ·~'' i;·: j''! t·;•' 1.' ,·. 1·1 ::: :'•tc .. I .N •>::: 070942 OH943 07C94'1 01cc;45 IJ709lf6 OH9't7 07t4!1t\8 070949 670950 no9s1 '17C•952 ( 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ...... ------. ·PROCE"SSIPIG OATE 9/lHeq-·rAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 ( ·2· .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR D'VALS SA~ES COMPANY MICHAEL Re 0£Bl1£UX · DECO DELPHI SYSTEMS, INC. OIGIDYNE COMPUTER SERVICES DOLLINGER· CORP. ·· ·· OOPADO ENTERPRISESt JNCe DUNN EDWARDS CORP • EIMCO PROcrss fQUIF. CO• EASTMAN• INC. CBER~A~D EQUIPMENT ELECTRONIC BALANCING CO. FALCON DISPOS•l S£RVJCE FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. FISCHER & PORTFR CO. · - FISHER SCIENTIFIC co. FLO-SY STEMS FRANCE COHPRESSOR PRODUC~ EDW•RD Re FRANCIS FROST ENGINEERING SERVICES CO. F~U IT GROVERS L:ABOR ATORY;· INC; --- C 1 TY Of FULLERTON GANAHL LUMBER CO. --JULIE GARNER ·· ··--· .. · GENERAL TELEFHONE CO. H.e. NURSERY · ~ACH COMPANY LARRY HALL'S HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS HJCH,.EL ·HEINZ W.C. HENDRIE & co., INC. HONEYVEllt INC. HUNTINGTON VALLEY TOOL· · HYDRO TEX ISCO COMPANY IMP~RIAL VEST CHEMICAL ·co~· INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IRVINE INDUSTRIAL LANDSCAPE · IRV JNE RANCtl WATER OISTR JCT JOHNSTON PUMP CO. "•E•C• COMPANY KAS SAFETY PRODUCTS KELLY PIPE CO• KING BEARING, INC. l & N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO L.e.w.s •• INC. CLAtM*·PAI~ 09/19/64 . Af'O\JNT OESCP. IPTION S3De3A PIPE SUPPLIES S6'1.28 CONFERENCE EXPENSES st H719 IJO . -.. · -ELECTR I CAl SUPPLIES s22s.oo COMPUTER PROGRAMMING s1.~26.08 MINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE ···st .-so~·•66···-~ -. COMPRESSOR PARTS $71330.28 SCRUBBER REPAtRS, PLANT #1 ENTRANCE GATE REPAIRS S778e78 PAINT SUPPLIES St;844940 ·· -·PIPE-SUPPLIES S823e60 OFFICE SUPPLIES S54.76 TRUCK PARTS . ---s•2•90 ---. --·-·-·scROll BALANCING S121652.t9 $LUDGE HAULING ANO DISPOSAL S24.~0 FREIGHT S32 7 •56 · -.... · PIPE· SUPPLIES S3l.10 LAB HANUAL S303.16 PUHP PARTS --·-----"'$6t664i 19 ·-·---···--·---coMPRfSSOR PARTS-... -· -·--·-·--. --·- Sl 79.67 TRAVEL EXPENSES S59a.t7 VALVES --. no• oo-·-... --·-.. ·LAB· "ANAlYS Is S175.91 WATER USEAGE S889.42 LUHBER --··-·-·-·-----·--s10.e9-... ______ -··EHPtoYEE HILEAQE-·--· .. -· .. --------- Slt476e76 TELEPHONE S2t650.0U LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES U63 e 77 ·-·· · .... --LAB SUPPLIES S201.'IO TRUCK REPAIRS S4~.65 SHALL HARDWARE -·-· ·· -· · S36 • 90 -··-· ··--· EMPLOYEE HI LEAGE S2t596e64 GEAR PARTS S53.03 STRIP CHARTS · ·s46~65 TOOLS s3,~95.53 ENGINE OIL s1.11s.e3 LAB SUPPLIES · .. Sllt722•H FERRIC CHLORIDE $301782.•0 COMPUTER SYSTEM S744e6~ PLANT MAINTENANCE $4 • 30 -WATER USEAGE ss22.se BEARING SUPPLIES S39t989.28 CSOOC #5 EHERGENCY REPAIRS S38•11 SAFETY SUPPLIES s2~9.74· PIPE SUPPLIES S4t747.22 BEARING SUPPLIES $4,794•40 UNIFORM RENTAL $120.~2 WELDING SUPPLIES .1 l 1 )t ,., .'I !'.I ~. , I ·1:;! ··1 .'"1 . i I H Ii ' ~ i • 1 . I I i " i ' ' I I I! 1,,: .,; I 1,! i 1 't I'··' I, r': i.:i J .. 'f ) ) '! J : .. · ;•• i .. ·'. H .. , i' '""' I • :: to I \.N :: (' I• I /,. : .. ~ ,, I i. t > Ci> ·~ t:j > ·,1 ..._ ~ m ~ !. ::st: <pp !1 )> w: I., t:I ..:-... Ct,) ~ ..._. $l Cl/) !'.'. i. i .. h , ... 'I j·. t'' i:: !·' 1.,1 ~ \;N ...... ·~ ., c· FUND NO &IARR ANT NO. 070953 !?7 0954 07!'1?55 0701?56 070957 0709~8 070959 070960 070961 07C9£.2 670~63 071)964 070965 070966 070967 f;.71)968 1)70569 1)70970 070971 070972 070~73 C70974 f!7l'975 !>70976 OH977 071i978 07 tt979 1)70980 070981 070982 070983 07 09811 '>70985 070986 070987 070988 07(1989 01099l 971)991 070992 07C993 07 C994 0 7'.l 995 1)70996 97~q97 070998 ( ~199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING OATf 9/14/84 PAGE Rf PORT NUHqER AP43 ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID ~9/19/84 VENDOR LA HOTTE CHEHICAL PRODUCTS LAUNDRY HOOD LAURSEN COLOR LAB HeV• LAWNHASTER & COt INC. LEUPOLD & STEVENS LEWCO £LECTRIC co. LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. LILLY TYPESETTING LOS ANGELES TIHES LYON~ INT'L SECURITY, INC. MARTIN LUT~ER HOSPITAL HCCROHET£R CORP MCKESSON C~EHICAL co. HILLER DRAPERY S£RVICC MINE SAFETY APflIANCES CO. PAUL A. MITCHELL MONTGOMERY EL(VATOR COMPANY Je ARTHUR HOOREt CAt INCe E.B. "ORITZ FOUNDRY HYERS TIRE SUPPLY NATEL & COe NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENcrs NATIONAL LUHeER SUPPLY NATIONAL SAFETY CCUNCIL OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. OLYHPIC CHE"IC4l CO • O~E DAV PAINT & eoov ORANGE COAST FOPD T~ACTOR ORA~GE COUNTY FARH SUPPLY CO. OXYGEN SERVICE COUNTY OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PACIFIC HOSJLE OFFICES PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO• PA~TS UNLIHITEO PEATt MARYICKt MITCHELL & CO. PEROWIOATION SYSTEMS, INC. PR£NTICE~HALLt INC. HAROLD PRIHROS£ ICE RAFFERTY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. RAND COMPUTER CENTER RE•CV-KLEFN CORP. THE REGISTER THE REGISTER RICOH CORP AMOUNT usu.an Sl61J.66 $436.'13 s1.19tt.30 S21l.61 S3fl6e56 $8'4 CJ.14 S763.20 S37!h88 1388.50 s5,59a.n5 SI 0 t. !i6 $113.'+2 S37.LO $5.30 S36.,49 S328e48 S134;.49 - S2,423.t6 $184.54 . s 2 • 12 5 i 0 0 -· .. - S21.95 S568e 10 010.00 -- $l7t9J5.90 Slt.lt54.0E · S234e:'?2 $166. H Sl1351e28 · S36e 71 S4:J5. 79 $532.00 UU.04 i211.9s n11.2e S8t655.00 Slt715.80 S96'5.54 Sll)f).OO ( S5le76 S.~34 • O!l. $829.86 Sl83.6'8 $615.59 S°'tl7e13 Sl35e68 DESCRIPTION LAB CHEMICALS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT FILK PROCESSING TESTING P2-26~ P2·25-2 CABLE ELECTRIC CART PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TYPESETTING CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ENGINE REPAIRS LAB CHEHICALS DRAPERIES PUHP PARTS EHPLOVEE MILEAGE PLANT #2 ELEVATOR HAINTENANCE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES MANHOLE RING & COVERS TRUCK TIRES · ·COHHUNICATION SYSTEK CONSULTING PUBLICATIONS SHALL HARDWARE SAFETY SEMINAR CAUSTIC SODA CHLORINE TRUCK REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS LAADSCAPING SUPPLIES SPECIALTY GASES LAB ANA LY S I S REIMBURSE WORKERS' COHP. FUND TRAILER RENTAL SAFETY SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS l,8J·8~ ANNUAL AUDIT HYDROGEN PEROXIDE PUBLI CATI OHS INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE-· TRUCK PARTS TRASH DISPSOAL COHPUTER SERVICES-DISTRICT 16 ENGINE PARTS GLASSIFIED ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING COPIER RENTAL :\ ;· . . ~ ; , •.. : ' ) ,. r ;.,· • ••• j ,.) ~.,! I: J. !' .I "• ( :::: td I ..s::- ( . ~ FUND NO f I ... ' \ , I !' I• l· j, !· j ! I' I !•··I H r~ 1·m 1ir·11 ,,::2: i,O j :t::a ,, ;;-'·--'. I~ I . I,, (~ !'''.1 I., .. r:t:-r'r-ri! rb ....... I (/j. LM l:::C ·-· I-~ : !...:i l (/') l. '' L· ,,, i) l..1 '; "' ,,1 ~ --:::! l 1·· ,.,r l·tti •. ,l '.v! .. :l:: .~ ·I : ..s::- • :< == •_.: WARRANT NO. 070999 0710'30 071C01 07ll''>2 071 ':'03 07 l IJ04 ·071005 071006 071007 07UH!8 071009 071010 071011 071012 071013 0710H IJ71tH5 071016" 071017 071018 071019 071020 971!'121 071022 071<'23 011n4 07 l'l25 071026 (J71027 071028 071029 C7103iJ e11031 071032 071033 C71034 071035 071036 07!037 071038 071(139 ( 9199 -JT OJST·WORKJNG CAPJTAL ....... ___ ....... _ PROCF.SSlNG DATC .. 9/H/M· 'PAGt:· ··· 11· · ·-• · R(PORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR ROBEPTSHAW CONTROLS CO. ROCCO'S TRUCK WRECKING RYAN•HERCO SUH A 4NA DODGE SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS YVONNE SCHWAB SENSOR rx. If.JC. SHAMROCK SUPPLY SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY• JNC SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON co. SO. CAL. GAS CO. ·SOUTHERN COUNTJ[S Oil COi .. SPACE SPRING & ST-"PING CO. STAINLr.ss PIPE & FITTING co. THr· SUPPLIERS· -· · · · ·· .. TAK UKAMINE TECHSONJCS CLAIMS PAID· 09/19/84 AMOUNT S254e83 f.7'J'l.CJO S262. 13 . $34 .53 $l e'l9'1.23' Slit e 35 S255.69 S!,463.21 ·-· ............ $111•56 $1051759.81 S2.999el8 DE SCR I PTI ON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES .TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC MOTORS . EMPLOYEE· Mt LEA GE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TOOLS PI PE SUPPLIES POWER ·--·-·· · · · · · ·· · · · S1~t469a38 · .... ----- . $236.53 NATURAL GAS DIESEL FUEL· PI PE SUPPLIES $165.42 PI PE SUPPLIES .. · .. Sh2!J7•00 SAFETY· SUPPLIES, TOOLS · --· · · -· · · · U •88•).00 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE $702.69 CONTROL EQUIPMENT · THOHPS ON LACQUER CO i · · .... --·--·----· -· .. -· · · ---sU6etJO $160. 65 $23.58 ······-·····--·PAINT SUPPLIES THREE H CO. CHANNON C • TIA TIME CLOCK SALES &··SERVICE TOH ARCO TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE TRUCK & AUTO --SUPPLY 9 I NC• UNION OIL CO. Of CALIF• UNITED PARCEL SERVICE VVP. SC ffNTIF IC VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. VALVf. ~ STEEL SUPPLY CO. VANIER GRAPHICS VA~ECt INC. RICHARD Ve VON LANGEN LARRY WALKER ASSOCIAT£St INC. JOHN R. WAPLES "EMCO PUMPS WESTERN VIRE & ALLOYS WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CO~P VJTEG SCIENTIFIC THOMAS ·Le WOOORUFFt INCe XEROX CORP. ZIP TEMPORARY PERSONN[l TOTAL CLAIMS FAJD 09/19/8lf ··-·s101.12 ----- St76. 31 sst.79 S2;398•7t ··-· sue.01 s2e.12 .. Sl t9~4• 29 S4:15.96 sie5.so Sc\9lf•10 S9.92lf .R2 S53A.20 S3t429e39 s392.ttn $930.ilO Utll1•5l U elt43. 80 Slll.85 U2t950.;35 $412.80 Slf'.56.98 S483t(t67.81 ================= . OFFICE SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 'TIHE-ClOCk REPAIRS TOOLS LOCK REPAIRS -TRUCK PARTS GASOLINE l)ELIVERY SERVICE ·tAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES, TOOLS VALVES PRINTED FORHS STEEL STOCK CONFERENCE EXPENSES CONTRACT ADHINSTRATION P2~23-6 ODOR CONSUL Tl NG lHPELLER PARTS WELD I NG SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LAB REPAIRS LEGAL SERVICES XEROX REPRODUCTION TEMPORARY HELP ( . ! 'i :~i) 1 I ·, r .1 ' "'t H !"• ., I·: '·'I ·• ! I : ·1 i.,i : .. · '··! ~· :t ' : ··! ) . I 1 I ~ ... , ) I : '~ ., ; I . '! .: ''.i I i::: ',1; "·j . ,, .: . ,._; :• :: td I· U1 :: jif" ···- ~ '. I ; q i 1.· I· '~· .. , , .j 1. ~ -- I. 1:1 ;;·i:x:- "'Ci) - . rri ;1 :z 1' t::;j, ;' .:::t> !. : ; ,.,_. ,. •--f 1 •. rri :.3 1 .. 1 j":::i:t:: r·.loo : ·:: ~ :'.: :x=-! 11 11r 1 ··1 ,,.lt::::::.t 1!._.. i".cn i"--1 , .. ,::::c •.1 ....... L1~· 1'':(/) I I. i I ~ 'i ·f· 1::: i:.'1 l::i "I I ... ' Ii ;·.~·: ···: !· .. • I I :: ~· 't::C i' ·! I U1 . ". :: ~·' FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL SUMMARY #1 OPER FUND 13 OPER FUND 15 OPER FUND 15 ACO FUND 16 OPER FUND 17 OPER FUND 17 F/R FUND #11 OPER FUND ... #13 ACO FUND #3&9 OPER FUND #5&6 OPER FUND 16&7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND . CORF .. .... . . ... ---·---. .. ... ----· -- SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND JT WORK I NG CAP ITAL 'f'iJND -. . . . ... - TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/19/Blf --- ( PROCESSING DATE 9/1 ... /8~ -···-·-· .. .. . ---· .. REPORT' NUMBER Al:i'ltJ -- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY C~AIHS.PA~' 09/19/8~ AMOUNT $ 9,206.U , .. ;,t;lt.32 lt1,028.57 11 • 31t 855~,,.---- 6,525.19 265.61t li,81)~ 2~) 3 .... oo 2,1&23.16 1,020.50 lt6.65 253,379.63 n;337;36 ...... ·· ·· ·----··- '' o. 50 1,082.00 ·--.... ·--· · ··o.211t.01t ... ·· · -... ··-· ·· ·· ·------·-.. $48)J6671 81 ( PAGE ( 5 ... I I ::! )r i I .: I ; '! i I : ! ' ; .. 1 j . ~ ., j ··: 1 i.'! j !.11 \:·i . , . ! I• I~ '! '--' . I 91 ., RFSOLtJTION NO. 84-170 AWARDING JOB NO. P2-SR-2 A JOINT RESOLCTION OP 'l'BE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OP COtJNTY SANITATION DIS'l'RIC'l'S NOS. l, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OP ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACl' FOR REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY SBDIMBNTATION BASINS •p• AND "G" AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-SR-2 * * * * * * • • • • * • • * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO BBBBBY RESOLVE, DBTERMINB AND ORDER: -- Section 1. '?hat the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of . . Direct.ors _by the Districts' Deputy Chief Bngin~r that.award of· contract be made to A4'1anc0 construct.ors, Inc. for Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins •p•_and BG• at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-SR-2, and bid tabulation and proposal ·submitted for said work are hereby received and· ordered filed1 and, Section 2. That the contract for Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins "!'" and BG• at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-SR-2, be awarded to Advanco Constructors, Inc. _in the total amount of $783,464.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein1 and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel1 and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. I I PASSED AND AOOPrED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1984. "C" AGENDA ITEM #9(A)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "C" ~ . --· ·-~ .. :• ........ , . . ... -· . ',. .. "D" 1 ADDENDUM September 25, 1984 ll:OOAoMo BID TABULATION SHEET JOB NO. P2-5R-2 REHABILITATION OP PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS •p• AND •G" AT PROJECT TITLE TREATMENT PLAN'!' NO. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Rehabilitate Primary Basins and Pumo Room for P & G Basins ENGINEER' s ESTIMATE _$_9._8...,0_.,_o_oo _____ _ BUDGET AMOT.JNT _$ __ 1_,_o_o_o_, _oo_o __ _ REMARKS ____________________________________________________________________ __ CONTRACTOR 1. Advanco Constructors, Inc. Opland, CA 2. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers Ontario, CA 3. Kiewit Pacific Company Arcadia, CA TOTAL BID· $ 783,464 $ 809,760 $ 810,777 4. West Am Builders & Engineers, Inc. Carson, CA s. Floyd -Kordick Redlands, CA I have reviewed the proposals low bid is a responsible bid. Constructors, Inc. of Opland, lowest and best bid. $ 815,000 $ 899,240 submitted for the above project and find that the I, therefore, recommend award to Advanco California, in the bid amount of $783,464 as the {lP'/;11 '°tUv~ Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer AGENDA ITEM #9(A)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "D" RESOLO'l'ION NO. 84-171 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. I-2R-2A A JOINT RF.SOLC'l'ION OF THE BOARDS OF DIREC'l'ORS OP COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIPICATIONS POR SUPPLEMENTAL REPAIR OP BUSHARD 'rRONK, PHASE II, JOB NO. I-2R-2A * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * WBBREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A. :. NOW,·'?llBRBJ'ORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Hos. 1, 2, 3, 5, · 6,. 7 and 11 of _Orange County, .California, CO BBRBBY RES.OLVB, DE'r.BRMINE AND ORDER: Section 1.. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have ~ concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed· project and hereby determine that said project is categ~rioally exempt from further CEQA requirementsi and, Section 2. That the project for Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to· file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the california Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended1 and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Districts' engineers for Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, are hereby approved and adopted; and, ,. Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for 6ids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) -ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" . --· .............. ~ -·-··-···---·-.. •, ..... ,. ...... ___ ..__ -· , .. --....... ...... -...--··· -· .... ___ ............ . of Californiar and, Section So That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read1 and, Section 60 That the Secretary and the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Direc:torso PASSBD AND ADOP'l'ED at a regular meeting held October 10, 19840 t "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(B) -ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" ~· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 1 of 5 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO·. C-06-1073-150 C. 0. NO. Four ( 4) CONTRACTOR~..__A_.d_v_a_nc_o __ C_o_ns_t_r_u_c_to_r_s~, __ In_c_. ______ __ ·DATE September 18, 1984 JOB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-25-2 · Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (»R»~tr) $ 35,192.09 ·. Jn accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/~r contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following addi.tions to or deducti'ons from the contract price are hereby approved. Item A -PCH252~6 Grit Chamber Diffuser Header Piping ~edification To improve reliability and ease of maintenance and to avoid problems encountered on similar existing units in· the past, a modification to mount all 46 3/4-inch air diffusers directly on the top of the air headers in Grit Chambers Nos. 7 and S (rather than to mount them on short 3/4-inch lines off the side of the headers} will be implemented ~Y Contractor at no additional cost arid no. additional ti~e. · ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS ·CHANGE ORDER ITEM: \.,.! - $ 0.00· 0 Calendar Days Item B -PCH252-10 Installation of Fiberglass Cove~ Plates and Frames ·Contractor installed four fiberglass ~over plates in the top· deck of the Grit Chambers Nos. 7 and 8 concrete work which were .not readily available as specified. Two were increased from 10" to 16" opening and two were increased from 18.11 to 24" 9pening for a total increased cost of $396.45. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item C -PCH252-ll Instrumentation Changes In order to accommodate field tmprovements to existing Plant No. 2 11 C11 Headworks instrumentation and electrical controls made subsequent to the award of this job, Contractor was directed to add certain additional electrical control and instrumentation devices, to modify new enclosures, and to install same in the field for a total additional cost of $3,834.96. This additional work was justified by the added utility and safety afforded by the revised arrangement. ~iODED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS $ 396.45 0 Calendar Days $3,834.96 O Calendar Days "F-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 2 of 5 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-150 c.o. NO. ____ Fo_u_r_(_4_) ________ __ CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Inc. DATE ________ se_p_t_e_m_be_r __ la_, __ 1_98_4 __ _ JOB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-25-2 Item D -PCH252-13 Revised Location of 10-Inch Sample Ports Contractor has relocated the six new 10-inch diameter sample ports on new grit chambers Nos. 7 and 8 from the concrete deck to the stainless steel grit chamber cover plates at no change in contract amount. This move was .made to improve operability of the plant and to facilitate construction. progress due to availability problems for ports suitable for this application. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME ·EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item E -PCH252-16 · 75 KVA Transformer Equipment Pad Change The new 75 KV.A transformer for Headworks "C" required Contractor to place a 4-inch high concrete pad on top of the existing building floor ~o meet the proper elevation for electrical equipment in that area for an added cost of $724.00. ADDED.COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item F -PCH252-17 Relocate 3-Inch Plant Water Line A new 3-inch plant water header which will supply jacket water for all the engines in Headworks "C" was fabricated as a unit rather than using the existing header as planned in order to avoid shutting down all five existing engines simultaneously. A new header was justified because it was mc~e cost effective than other alternates and allowed t~e plant to continue operations required to minimize odors and to meet NPOES requirements. · ADCED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c)· -ALL DISTRICTS $ o.oo 0 Calendar Days s 724.00 0 Calendar Days $ 2,070.14 0 Calendar Days "F-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. Q. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 3 of 5 CH.A.NGE ORDER GRANT NO. ___ C_-0_6_-_10_7_3_-_15_0 ____ __ C.O. NO. _____ Fo_u_r_._(4~) ________ __ CONTRACTOR: ___ Ad_v_a_n_co __ C_o_n_st_r_u_c_t_or_s~, __ In_c_. ________ __ DATE ________ s_e~pt_e_m_b_er __ I_a_,_1_9_84 __ _ JOB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACI.LITIES AT PLANT NO. Z, JOB NO. P2-25-2 Item G · -PCH252-9 Diffuser Air Pipe and Pipe Supports For reasons of increased operability and increased corrosion resistance, Contractor eliminated three 4-inch flex couplings, changed 4-inch diffuser air riser pipes from ductile iron to Schedule 80 PVC, changed 1-1/2-jnch and 1-inch galvanized steel diffuser air collection channel ·pipe to Schedule 80 PVC, changed all pipe supports and mounting hardware in the. collection channel and Grit Chambers Nos. 7 and 8 from steel to 316 stainless steel and provided an additional 36-inch diameter manhole with cover in the concrete deck over the collection channel •. ADDED COST THIS CHANG~ ORDER ITEM: TIME" tXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: '-'}tern H -AW252-1 Repair Discharge Piping on Main Sewage. Pumps Extensive corrosion was found in both Pump No~ 1 and Pump No~ 3 42-inch discharge lines at the discharge channel floor line. · ·contractor repaired both by welding a 24-inch wide, 3/8-inch thick carbon steel band all around the inside.of each pipe and by sandblasting and coal tar coating as well. These repairs were justified since the job otherwise would not have performed as designed. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,424.52 . . . 0 Calendar Days $ 6,042.94 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDE~ ITEM: Two (2) Calendar Days Item J -A~/252-2 Repair Discharge Piping on All Sewage Pumps (8) As new discharge elbows were welded to Pumps No. 1 and No. 3 42-inch lines, it was discovered that the existing lines, which are cast into the concrete discharge channel floor, 'I/ere badly out of round or 11 eggshaped 11 • To provide a· smooth weld, Contractor used considerably more labor than planned and welded both inside the pipes and out to give the proper quality work as specified. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ~IME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS s 1,772.42 0 Calendar Days "F-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 4 of 5 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-150 c . o. NO. Four ( 4) CONTRACTOR: Advance Constructors, Inc. DATE --------------September 18,. 1984 JOB: HYDRA'JLIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-25-2 . Item K -EW252-2 Replace Existing Waterstops Contractor accanplished extensive modifications to the collection and discharge channel waterstops at "C" Headworks on a ~orce account basis for an additional cost of $10,347.52. Both existing waterstops were beyond repair so both were chipped completely out of the existing channel walls ·and new PVC material was successfully installed using epoxy cement. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CH.ANGE ORDER ITEM: $10~347 .52 O Calendar Days Item L -PCH~52-4 C.oating of Existing Grit Chamber Overflow Structure The inner surface of the existing grit chamber overflow concrete structure was found during the new work on this job to be badly corroded due to sulfide attack similar to that being f6un4 throughout the Districts' collection system. Since a 100 mil Zebron polyurethane protective coating was specified for the new work matching up to ·. this structure, the opportunity to make a similar Zebron application to repair the existing structure was cost ·· effective since the .safety an·d related costs to enter and work in the structure were already in place. There- fore, Contractor accomplished the extra Zebron application successfully for an additional cost of $8,579.14. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,579.14 ... TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $35,192.09 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: Two {2) Calendar Days "F-4'; AGENDA ITEM #9(c) -ALL DISTRICTS "F-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 5 of 5 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. C-06-1073-150 c. o. NO. Four ( 4) CONTRACTOR: Advance Constructors, Inc •. OATE _______ s_ep~t_e_m_be_r __ l_B_,_1_9_8_4 __ _ JOB: HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY FACILITIES.AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-25-2 The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the.prime work and within. the time allotted for the original contract plus the.tw6 {2) d~ys time extension granted hereby. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension other than the two '(2) days approved herein is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or con- sequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRAC'T Tl.ME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract T1me Revised Completion Date ·september 12, 1983 600 Calendar Days May 3, 1985 . Two (2) Calendar Days Two (2) Calendar Days 602 Calendar Days . May 5, 1985 . Original Contract Price $ 3 ,210 ,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 15,737.59 This Change {ADD) (»l~) $ 35,192.09 Amended Contract Price $ 3,260,929.68 Board authorization date: October 10, 1984 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION of {-zd(~ nt~actbr "F-5" AGENDA IT~M #9(c). -ALL DISTRICTS "F-5" ·. ,.,. . '.·· .... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER N/A GRANT NO•--------------------~ c. o. NO. · Three ( 3) CONTRACTOR: ___ P_a_s_c_al __ & __ L_ud_w_i~g __ E_ng~i_n_e_e_rs ________ _ DATE ----------------------------September 18, 1984 JOB: PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS P AND Q AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-26 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 6.oo --------------------In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Following completion of the design and award phase of this job, revised general grading .and paving and revised entrance gate improvement schemes were deveioped for Plant No. 2. Part of these improvements require that the work included on this job around the Plant - No. 2 entrance area be altered to match in certain details only and without adding to the scope of work.or materially changing the nature of the work. Thus, Contractor has implemented this change to·the area grading and paving in the vicinity of the Plant No. 2 er.trance per drawing PCH-226-1 with no ~hange in contract amount or time of completion. TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $0.00 TOTAL ADDED TIME THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this change order can _be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time ·allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this change order and no direct or .indirect, i nci den ta 1 or consequent i a 1 costs or expenses have been or wi 11 be incurred by contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Notice to Proceed Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date September 16, 1983 December 14, 1983 · 365 Calendar Days December 14, 1984 0 Calendar Days O Calendar Days No Change No Change Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes Tnis Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) Amended Con~ract Price $ 2,174,300.00 $ 19,074.18 $ o.oo $ 2,193,374.18 Board authcrization date: October 10, 1984 Approved: COUNTY ~ANITATION DISTRICTS OF ·By Orang{A" Cali~a By~~~ Contractor Deputy Chief Engineer "G" AGENDA ITEM #9(n) -ALL DISTRICTS "G" RFSOLtJTION NO. 84-172 ACCEP!'ING JOB NO. PW-116 AS COMPLETE A JOIN'!' RESOLOTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OP CO~Y SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OP ORANGE COtJN'rY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING UPS SYSTEM FOR PLANT NO. 2 RPtJ'S, JOB NO. PW-116, AS COMPLB'n 'AND APPROVING PINAL CLOSEOO'.r AGREEMEN'l' * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, california, DO BBREBY RFSOLVE, DB'l'BBMINE AND ORDER: Section l. That the contractor, Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, has completed tjle construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for OPS . System·for ·Plant No. 2 RPtJ's, Job No •. PW-116, on September 24, 19841 and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been c:ompleted in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed1 and, Section 3. That OPS Sy~tem for Plant N~. 2 RPQ' s, Job No. PW-116, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance witb the terms of the contract therefor, dated ·June 27, 19841 and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion thereforr and, Section s. That the Pinal Closeout Agreement with Prank Oltimo, General Building Contractor, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of OPS System for Plant No. 2 RPO's, Job No. PW-116, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel1 and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for,, itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and ll, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a reqular meeting held October 10, 1984. "H" AGENDA ITEM #9(E) -ALL DISTRICTS ."H" RESOLOTION NO. 84-173 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOBE OIL STORAGE TANK AT FOSTER POMP STATION, PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-129 A JOIN'l' RESOLtJ'l'ION OF 'rBE BOARDS OP DIREC'l'ORS OF COtJNTY SANI'l'M'ION DISTRIC'l'S NOS • l, 2 I 3 I s, 6 I 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COtJNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS ARD SPBCIPICA'l'IONS FOR LUBE OIL S'l'ORAGB 'l'ANK A'l' FOSTER POMP STATION I PLANT NO. 2 I JOB NO. PW-129 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Lube Oil Storage Tank at Poster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-=>129. NOW, TBBBBPOU, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO BBREBY RESOLVE, DBTEMINB AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts•· Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby determine that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements1 and, Section 2. That. the project for Lube Oil Storage 'l'ank at Poster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any doc:uments required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended1 and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by DistriQts' engineers for Lube Oil Storaqe Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, are hereby approved and ' adoptedJ and, Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids \.,.,) "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California1 and, Section S. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read1 and, Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOP'l'BD at a regular meeting held October 10, 1984. , II 1-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(F) -ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-174 AWARDING PURCHASE CONTRACT TO FURNISH, DELIVER. AND SUPPLY CHLORINE IN BULK AT PLANTS NOSo 1 AND 2, SPECIFICATION NOo C-015 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DIS'l'RICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OP ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING PURCHASE CX>NTRAC'l' TO FURNISS, DELIVER AND SUPPLY CHLORINE IN BOLK AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2, SPECIFICA- TION NO. C-015, TO OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CX>MPANY * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7· and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boar~s of Directors by the Districts' Chief of Procurement that award of pur.chase contract be made to Olympic Chemical Company to Furnish, Deliver and Supply Chlorine in Bulk at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. C-015, and the bid tabulation and proposal '-1) submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filedJ and, Section 2. That said contract for Specification No. C-013 be awarded to Olympic Chemical Company at the unit price of $156.00 pe; ton plus sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal thereforJ and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanita~ion District No. 1, on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, s, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a purchase contract with said supplier to supply chlorine pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the Gener~l Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1984. "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" BJ:D TABULATION SHEET September 25,1984 Tuesday, 11:00 A.M. JOB NO. C-015 PROJECT TITLE BULK CHLORINE PURCHASE AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Furnish and deliver Chlorine in Bulk at Plants 1 and 2 1. 2. 3. 4. s. CONTRACTOR Olympic Chemical Company Wilmington, CA McKesson Chemical Company . Tustin, CA Jones Chemicals, Inc. Torrance, CA Continental Chemical Company Sacramento, CA Occidental Chemical Company Irvine, CA· PRICE PER TON $156.00 183.00 197.00 No Bid No Response I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Olympic Chemical Company of Wilmington, California, in the bid amount of $156.00 per ton as the lowest and best Qid. The cost, based on estimated 7,000 ton usage from November 1, 1984 through Oct- ober 31, 1985, will be approximately $1,092,000.00. This contract may be extended for an additional one year period, if agreed to in writing by both the Districts and supplier. The Districts are current- ly paying $101.90 per ton for 1 ton cylinders under our current con- tract with Continental Chemical Company. ·-. , /~ . .,/ . ( -/~~ _,~~~ ed lfoff,~n/ lt.~,- Chief of Procurement & Property :-~---,~ c;igned By..:.~~<€~ '...I II J-2" / ~ENDA ITEM #9(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "J-2" ·" .' .. RESOLUTION NO. 84-176-2 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OP PROCEEDINGS RE ANNEXATION NO. 60 -TOWNSEND ANNEXATION A RBSOLO'l'ION OP THE BOARD OP DIRECl'ORS OP COUNTY SANITA'?ION DIS'l'RIC'1' NO. 2 OP ORANGE COUN'l'Y, CALIFORNIA, ATJTHORIZING THE INITIATION OP PR:>CEEDINGS TO ANNEX 'l'BRRITORY TO '!'BB DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 60 -TOWNSEND ANNBXM'?ON 'l'O COONTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, : california, DOE BDBBY RBSOLVB DE'l'DMINB AND ORDER: That an application for annexation of territory to itself be made to the Local Aqency Pormation Commission as follows: Section l. That this proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of californiai and, Section 2. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately .60 acres located in at 243 South Del Giorgio Road in the City of Anaheim, to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as requested by Mr. w.c. Townsend, owner of said property, and, Section 3. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Section 4. That the designation assigned to the territory proposed to be annexed is •Annexation No. 60 -Townsend Annexation to County Sanitation District Ro. 2w, the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibits "A• and "Bn, attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolutioni and, "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(M) -DISTRICT 2 "K-1" Section 5. That provisions for all fees required to be paid as a condition of the annexation must be satisfied prior to completion of annexation proceedings7 and, Section 6. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (l) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and, Section 7. That request is hereby made that such proceedings as required by law be taken to complete this annexation. PASSED AND ADOPrED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1984. -.. ,. "K:-2" AGENDA ITEM #9{M). -DISTRICT 2 "K-2" ' • ' ' -' • ' • • ·, •• ' -j ••• • • ,_ ' • -:--• • • ' • I. n ;'!:!.¥p?1'\;··' :t'>_; ·'·;'1"f.·~-'~}$:'.;•f .Ef.'JJ, •. rn7:i:tf:'-!.~tt~ ·t~ It~ ·<:•1: p.:._•·'.-".,•J. :' i ::·'.?:· f .. •.< '"i:''.'!i'. 4 "'~·~!t'9\':i': ''\~"~·":. ;· •.:. 11~v:•"}';t):,0~·':'''<~~w ... ".···'· ·: '. ··.~~-·:~•5, '-'..~'.4" r. ,f; i'Y., ·!• ·. I . September 25, 1984 STAFF .REPORT Fairview Subtrunk Connection to the Sunflower Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 7-9 At the intersection of Fairview Road and Sunflower Avenue in the City of Santa Ana District No. 7 operates two sewerso One is the Fairview Subtrunk which drains from north to south and outlets to the Gisler-Redhill Sewer on the south side of the San Diego Freeway. The Gisler-Redhill Sewer, in turn, drains to the - College Avenue Pumping Station...before entering Reclamation Plant No. 1. The Fairview Subtrunk, constructed by the City of Santa Ana and accepted by the Districts in the 1950's, is relatively shallow. The other is the Sunflower Interceptor Sewer, a deeper sewer, which drains in a westerly direction directly to Plant No. 1 and, while it is too low to presently enter the Plant No. 1 Headworks, it· can be bypassed directly to Plant No. 2 without additional pumping. · An ·interconnection of the Fairview Subtrunk to the Sunflower Interceptor would divert flow from the overloaded Gisler-Redhill Sewer· and avoid pumping charges associated with the College Avenue Pumping Station. In addition, the connection would eliminate the need for a future parallel line south of Sunflower Avenue identified in the 1982 Master Plan. The City of Santa Ana has required a developer to construct a new storm drain in Sunflower Avenue roughly parallel to the Sunflower Interceptor Sewer. As part of this construction, it was determined that the best storm drain alignment wou·ld interfere with an existing manho·1e on the District's Fairview Subtrunk. That manhole will be relocated under the City contract at no cost to the · District. After discussions with the project sponsors and designers, our staff has concluded that it would be very timely to install the connection between the Fairview Subtrunk and the Sunflower Interceptor Sewer concurrent with the construction of the storm drain. Preliminary discussions have been held with C. J. Segerstrom and Sons, Inc., the administrators of the storm drain contract, and they are willing to include this connection as a change order to their storm drain contract. Constructing the connection now, as opposed to constructing it under a separate contract in the future, would reduce traffic control and paving requirements and thus minimize the public's inconvenience. It would also reduce costs. Staff has estimated that the connection would cost a maximum of $19,200 if incorporated with the storm drain work. · Staff recorrmends that authority be granted to the General Manager to negotiate for the construction of the connection between Fairview Subtrunk and the Sunflower Interceptor Sewer in an amount not to exceed $19,200. If a satisfactory price cannot be reached within these limits, the construction will \.._) not take place at this time but will be bid as a separate job at a later date. "L" AGENDA ITEM #9(o)(l) -DISTRICT 7 "L" RESOLUTION NO. 84-179-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 96 -HORN ANNEXATION) A RESOLDTION OF '1'BE BOARD OP DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 96 -HORN ANNEXATION 'l'O O)tJNTY SANITATION DIS'l'RICT NO. 7) * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES BBREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District bY means of a petition filed by the property owner1 and, Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) '..I of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation.of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 7 by P & K Development on behalf of Mr. Born, the owner of said property to be annexed, by ~ans of Resolution No. 84-179-7, filed with said Commission by the DistrictJ and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is •Annexation No. 96 -Born Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 1•, the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A• and shown on Exhibit •s• attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolutionr and, Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited1 and, t Section s. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory: and, "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -DISTRICT 7 "M-1" Section 60 That provision for payment of annexation acreage fees in the amount of $4,556089 has been satisfied: and, section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies: and Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ACOPl'ED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1984. "M-2 11 · AGENDA ITEM #9(p) -DISTRICT 7 "M-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-175 APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT OF GENERAL COUNSEL A JOINT RESOLO'l'ION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COON'l'Y, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECO'rION OP AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT OF GENERAL COUNSEL • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, s, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETEBMINE AND ORDER: Section· 1. That Amendment No. 7 to· that certain agreement dated May 1, 1975, by and between County Sanitation· District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and ll of Orange County, California, and Thomas L. Woodruff, Attorney at Law, providing for an adjustment of the fee schedule for legal services performed as General Counsel for said Districts, is hereby approved and accepted in· the form attached hereto as Exhibit •An and incorporated herein by this ref erence1 and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said amendment on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, s, 6, 7 and 11. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1984. "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(s) -ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" CORREN'!' RATES RE AGREEMENT EMPLOYING THOMAS L. WOODRUFF AS GENERAL COUNSEL Thomas L. Woodruff -$105.00 Other Partners of Pim -105.00 Associate Attorneys 90.00 Appearance by Counsel in court, before publi~ agency or pu~lic hearing -500.00/day (1/2 day or l~ss -$250.00) Appearance by Counsel at conferences or.meetings -300.00/day (or $100.00/hour whichever is less) \...}- , EXHIBIT •A• to Resolution No. 84-175 "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(s) -ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" -------····------···. --- I • REPORT AND SUMMARY OF DISTRICT NO. 2's AND LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION'S ACTIONS RE PRPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 41 -TRACT NO. 9713 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 PURPOSE OF ANNEXATION The purpose of this annexation is to provide public sanitary sewer service for approximately 2.49 acres of territory proposed to be annexed in the vicinity easterly of Santiago Boulevard and northerly of Santiago Canyon Road in the City of Orange. PURPOSE OF HEARING Because petitions requesting annexation of said territory have not been signed by 100% of· the property owners, it is necessary to hold this public hearing to determine if there is a majority protest against annexation to the Sanitation District. · If less than 25% of the number of landowners within the territory owning not more than 2~% of the assessed valuation of iand therein, and less than 25% of the voting power of voters· entitled to vote as a result of residing in or owning property within the territory, protest, then following the hearing, the Board may order annexation of the territory without election. If more than 25% but less than 50% of the number of landowners within the territory, or more than 25% but less than 50% of the voting power·, protest, then an election must be held.' If more than 50% of the assessed valuation or more than 50% of· the voting power protest, then the annexation must be abandoned. ASSESSED VALUATION The assessed valuation of the territory has been determined to be $2,605,044.00 PROPOSED ACTION IF PROTESTS ARE INSUFFICIENT If it is determined that protests, if any, are insufficient, the Board may proceed with adoption of Resolution No. 84-178-2, setting forth the Board's findings re proposed Annexation No. 41 and ordering said annexation. "0-1 AGENDA ITEM #27(A)(2) -DISTRICT 2 "0-1" TO DATE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS HAVE TAKEN PLACE on July 9, 1980, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 80-123-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex the territory to the District. on February 7, 1984, the County Assessor's office advised that the original petitioner, David J. Sabag, was no longer the property owner of the area within proposed Annexation No. 41 and that not all of the current property owners had signed a petition requesting annexationo On June 6, ·1984, the Local Agency Formation Commission adopted Resolution No. 84-44, declaring its findings regarding the proposed annexation, approving said annexation, and directing County Sanitation District Noo 2 to proceed with the annexation and to conduct said proceedings in accordance with Chapter 1, Part S, Division 1 of the Government Code. On September 12, 1984, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 84-162-2, fixing the date, time and place of public hearing on proposed Annexation No. 41 -Tract No. 9713 to County Sanitation.District No. 2, and establishing the procedures for filing of written protest. Notice of Public Hearing has been posted in the District' ·office since September 18, 1984. On September 24, 1984, documents were mailed to owners of record within the territory proposed to be annexed, containing the following information: Official Notice of Public Hearing Map indicating area to be annexed Resolution No •. 84-162-2 fixing the hearing Legal notice of the hearing was published in The Register on September 26 and October 3, 1984. To date, no written protests have been filed with the Secretary. "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #27(A)(2) -DISTRICT 2 • j. ... "0-2" coum SANITATION DlmlCTS NOS. l, ~' 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANG~ coum, CAUFORNIA . MINUTES OF THE BOUR MEETING 011 · SEPTEMBER 12, 1984 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 108«. EI.IJS· A VENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY~ CALIF.ORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on September 12, 1984, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and int•'>Cation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2~, 5, 6, 7 and 11 as follows: DISTRICT NO. 1: DISTRICT NO. 2: DISTRICT NO. 3: DISTRICT NO. 5: -... DISTRICT NO. 6: DISTRICT NO. 7: \.._I DISTRICT NO. 11: ACTIVE DIRECTORS x Robert Hanson, Chairman -X--Dan Griset, Chairman pro tem x Don Saltarelli _!._Roger Stanton x Henry Wedaa, Chairman -X--oon Roth, Chairman pro tem -X--Richard Buck x Buck Catlin x Sam Cooper x Dan Griset a John Holmberg a carol Kawanami _!._James Neal x Bob Perry x Don Smith -!,_Roger Stanton x Dori Roth, Chairman -X--carrey Nelson -X--oscar Brownell x · Buck Catlin _!._Norman Culver x Henry Frese -X--oon Griffin -X--oan Griset . a John Holmberg x James Neal -X--Richard Olson a Richard Partin x Roger Stanton x Charles Sylvia x John A. Thomas a Martha Weishaupt x Evelyn Hart, Chairman x Ruthelyn Plwmner, Chairman pro tem _!._Roger Stanton a James Wahner, Chairman x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem _!._Roger Stanton x Don Smith, Chairman -X--Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem · -X--Richard Edgar -X--oan Griset x David Sills x Roger Stanton a James Wahner x Ruth Bailey, Chairman x Ron Pattinson _!._Roger Stanton -2- ALTERNATE DIRECTORS _orma Crank ____ Robert Luxembourger _Ursula Kennedy ____ Harriett Wieder _Todd Murphy _E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. _Arthur Newton Chris Norby Carrey Nelson ____ Robert Luxembourger _Bill Mahoney _William Odlum _Marvin P. Adler _Norman Culver Gene Beyer Harriett Wieder _____ H. Llewellyn O~erholt Sam Cooper Joyce Risner Chris Norby Bob Perry Norma Seidel Jesse Davis Robert Luxembourger ~ill Mahoney ----Marvin P. Adler Bruce Finlayson ____ Gerald Mullen ____ Harriett Wieder David Lander -Robert P. Mandie, Jr. Jean Siriani Philip Maurer -----Jacqueline Heather Harriett Wieder Steven Smith -Philip Maurer Harriett Wieder Gene Beyer Philip Maurer _Ursula Kennedy _____ Robert Luxembourger ____ Harriett Wieder _Barry Green Don MacAllister ----Robert Mandie Harriett Wieder 9/12/84 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, William H. Butler, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Blake Anderson, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Ray Young, Richard von Langen, Chuck Winsor, Bob V Ooten OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Suzanne Atkins, Bill Knopf, Linda Pattinson * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICTS J, 7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpts re Board APPointments That the minute excerpts from the following cities re appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: City District(s) Cypress 3 Huntington Beach 11 Irvine 7 Active Director Richard Partin* Ruth Bailey Ron Pattinson David Sills* Alternate Director Gerald Mullen Robert P. Mandie, Jr. Robert P. Mandie, Jr. Sally Anne Miller DISTRICT 3 The Joint Chairman advised the , Election of Chairman pro tem District 3 Directors that due to a \.) change in Board representation, Director Gerald Mullen from the City of Cypress would no longer be an active Director and that election of a new Chairman pro tem for the District would, therefore, be in order. Director Carrey Nelson was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of District No. 3. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meetings held July 11, 1984, and August 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ., DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments ~ Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered tjiat said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting ~ held August 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -3- ;: 9/12/84 DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Aeproval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meetings held July 11, 1984, and August 8, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Chairman Edgar reported on the Annual Report of the Joint Chairman Work Conference of the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) held in Monterey in August which he and Directors Bob Hanson, Don Smith and Jim Wahner attended, along with the General Manager and General Counsel. Be announced that he had been re-elected to a full term as a Director on the CASA governing board. Mr. Edgar then reviewed some of the topics discussed and various presentations given at the conference which included: -The impact of Proposition· 36 (Jarvis IV Initiative) -Changing labor relations in the public sector -An update on State Water Resources Control Board issues and activities by SWRCB Member, Darlene Ruiz -A Presentation on the effects of wastewater on the ocean environment by Willard Bascom, the Director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP),. of which the Districts are a member agency. ~ An informative. presentation on operating landfills as "Good Neighbors" in Los Angeles County The Joint Chairman further reported on actions that the general CASA assembly had taken at the conference. Mr. Edgar also added· that he was pleased to announce that the former General.Manager, Fred A. Harper, was appointed an.honorary member of CASA. Joint Chairman Edgar commented on a letter he had previously mailed to all Directors with regard to the impact on the Districts of Redevelopment Agency projects within the various cities. Be asked the Directors to urge their respective cities to respond to his letter, if they have not already done so, in order that-the Boards' Fiscal Policy· Committee may have the information necessary to. consider the alternatives for funding of District services to Redevelopment Agency project are.as at the Committee's October meeting • . . Mr. Edgar briefly reported on a letter. received from the Irvine Ranch Water District requesting· a.change. in the design-and alternative pipe. size· of· the Von Karinan Trunk Sewer System in District No. 1· that would provide capacity to serve proposed District No. 14. Be advised that: the-Select Committee is recommending that this change be approved. to provide a more· efficient system. if District No. 14 is formed. _Be reported that District No. 7 would consider this matter later in the agenda. . . ~ ::·. ~4.;.:: . 9/12/84 Chairman Edgar then called said Executive Conunittee meeting for Wednesday, September 26 at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager briefly reported on Report of the General Manager the status of the Districts' 30l(b) ~ Waiver/NPDES Permit. Be indicated that approval by EPA's headquarters in Washington, D.C. has not yet been received, as previously anticipated, but that our staff was staying in contact with EPA's Region IX offices. We hope to receive approval soon. Following joint signature by EPA Region IX and the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the permit will become effective after a 33-day public notice period. Mr. Sylvester commented that odor problems experienced at the treatment plants were because of the extremely hot weather. As a result it has been necessary to use more chlorine to combat these odors than the $489,000 originally anticipated· for a 12-month period when the chlorine purchase contract was awarded last year. Based on the increased demand, it now appears as if the expenditure will run as much as $700,000. Be also reported that immediate action operating modifications reconunended by the odor consultant engaged by the Districts, Malcolm Pirnie, have been implemented to help mitigate the odor problems. The consultant's full report and recommendations are scheduled to be presented to the Executive Committee in November. The General Manager added that.there is a recommended agenda action for the District 3 Board to authorize a supplemental odor control study to be conducted by Malcolm Pirnie relative to the feasibility of upstream odor control measures at different points along the Miller-Bolder Trunk Sewer to control odors as the sewage flows from the northern part of the county to the Districts' treatment plant. There would also be residual benefits ~ at Plant No. 2 from such a program. The General Manager then advised that the tour of proposed District No. 13 had been scheduled for Thursday, September 27, and would begin with a breakfast workshop at 8:00 a.m. at Mimi's Cafe in Yorba Linda followed by a bus tour of the area. Mr. Sylvester added that reminders would be mailed to those Directors indicating an interest in attending the workshop and tour. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Districts' 1983-84 Interest Earnings Report from the County Treasurer Mr. Sylvester reported that the Districts bad received a report from the Orange County Treasurer regarding interest earned for the 1983-84 fiscal year on the Districts' construction reserves. The report indicated that the average interest rate earned during fiscal year 1983-84 was 10.8% which was down from the 12.79% earned in 1982-83 but is higher than the average earned for the State of California. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the 1983-84 year-end fiscal report of the interest earned by the Districts, submitted by the Orange County Tax Collector-Treasurer, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly reported on Report of the General Counsel the Attorney's Committee meeting at the Annual Work Conference of the California ~ Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA). Be indicated that they had an extremely full agenda and he felt that it was a very beneficial meeting. Be also noted that the General Manager and he had been appointed to sit on a committee on behalf of CASA to provide direct input to Congress with regard to the proposed 1984 Clean Water Act Amendments. -s- 9/12/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of Payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A", \wl "B", •c• and "D", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. -.. 7/11/84 7/25/84 8/08/84 8/22/84 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - Capital Outlay Revolving Fund $ 518,411.49 $277,338.80 Joint Working Capital Funds Self-Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT -$1,473.SS $ 136.00 9,483.92 6,713.36 807,059.04 40,764.02 22,168.60 833.72 167,938.06 2,080.84 35.35 3,346.59 71.90 27.81 6,628.50 251,235.07 78,155.43 44,088.73 632.44 7,390.45 10,603.21 8,383.36 1.03 91,120.67 6,460.68 3,997.36 $10,957.47 $6,849.36 $1,569,365.92 $779,407.23 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase of Piper Valves and Fittings, Specification That the bid tabulation and reconunendation re annual purchase of Pipe, Valves and Fittings, Specification No. P-065 No. P-065, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed1 and, FORTBER MOVED: That said annual purchase order contracts. be, and are hereby, awarded as follows: Vendor Group I -Malleables Valley Cities Supply Group II -Pipe Kelly Pipe & Industrial Galv. & Black Suply Group III -Valves Valley Cities Supply Ohio Brass (Mfg) & Apollo (Mfg) Group IV -PVC Pipe & Valley Cities Supply Fittings -6- Annual Amount Not to Exceed $25,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 9/12/84 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order for One Spare Set of Bendix Fuel Injectors for 1500 Horsepower Delavel Blower Engines at Plant No. 1, Specif !cation No. E-155 Horsepower Delavel Blower Engines at ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the General Manager to execute a Lease Agreement re Districts' Cobey Composter, Specification No. L-012 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize the staff to issue a purchase order to Transamerica Delavel, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $21,252.00 plus tax and freight, for One Spare Set of Bendix Fuel Injectors for 1500 Plant No. 1, Specification No. E-155. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby approve and authorize the General Manager to execute a Lease Agreement with East Bay Municipal Utility District, in form approved by the General Counsel, for Lease of Districts' Cobey Composter, Specification No. L-012, not currently being used by the Districts, at the rate of $300 per month for a maximum period not to exceed three months. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change-Order A to Purchase Order Contract No. 16798 That the staff be, and is hereby, with Tak Takamine Landscape & authorized to issue Change Order A to Maintenance re additional work Purchase Order Contract No. 16798 with Tak Takamine Landscape & Maintenance re Specification No. M-015, Landscape Maintenance, to include additional one-time work required on the Brookhurst Parkway at Plant No. 2 and at the Seal Beach Pump Station, increasing the total authorized amount from $24,400.00 to an amount not to exceed $25,000.00. \...,) ALL DISTRICTS Amending Boards' action on March 14, 1984 re Evaluation of Pilot-Scale Biperion Process, Job No. PW-127 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards' action on March 14, 1984, be, and is hereby, amended to authorize installation and evaluation of Pilot-Scale Hiperion Process, Job No. PW-127, to reduce sulphur content in digester gas scrubbing systems, to be installed under force account at the digester gas compressor facility at Plant No. 2, increasing the total cost from $25,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $39,500.00 for extra work to comply with AQMD additional temporary permit requirements. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order A to Purchase Order Contract No. 14240 with Aqua Ben Corporation re Specification No. P-060 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order A to Purchase Order Contract No. 14240 for Liquid or Special Emulsion, Polyelectrolyte Chemical Flocculent, Specification No. P-060, with Aqua Ben Corporation, to extend said contract on a month-to-month basis, from October 14, 1984, for a period not to exceed six months at the current unit price of $.075 per wet pound, at no increase in the total authorized maximum amount of $945,000.00 plus applicable sales tax and freight. -7- 9/12/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-122 specifications for Cooling water Reuse at Foster Pwnp Station, Job No. PW-122, \..,! authorizing an addition of $3,065.00 to the contract with Wolder Engineering, Inc. for installation of a connection to an in-service existing plant water line and granting a time extension of 75 calendar days to secure the necessary materials, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications re Job No. P2-25-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, authorizing an addition of $9,537.38 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for miscellaneous modifications and additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Job No. P2-26 specif !cations for Primary Sedimentation Basins P & Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26, authorizing an· addition of $3,344.18 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for additional work due to interference during construction between an existing 8-incb digester cleaning line and a new access ladde~, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS ~ · Aeproving plans and specifications re Jobs Nos. PW-061R-2 and PW-061R-3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-149, approving plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Digesters c and D at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-061R-2, and Rehabilitation of Digesters F and G at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-061R-3, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Aeproving plans and specifications re Job No. P2-28-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-150, approving plans and specifications for Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling, Job No. P2-28-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing the maximum hourly rate for the position classifica- tion of Part-Time Construction Inspector Moved, seconded and duly carried: . That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-151, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing the maximum hourly rate for the position classification of Part-Time Construction Inspector at the same rate as the top step of the full-time Construction Inspector position. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -s- 9/12/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, That the Boards of Directors hereby decreasing the salary range for the adopt Resolution No. 84-152, amending ~ position classification of Senior Positions and Salaries Resolution Accounting Technician No. 79-20, as amended, decreasing the salary range for the position classification of Senior Accounting Technician from Range No. 1058C ($1709/$2129) to Range No. 1056G ($1574/$1960). A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate with John Carollo Engineers re Job No. Pl-22 and Job No. J-6-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committe be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate with John Carollo Engineers for design of Electrical Reliability at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-22, and Electrical Reliability at Foster Pump Station, Job No. J-6-2: ALL DISTRICTS Amending the Districts' Conflict of Interest Code to include recent legislative amendments to the State law Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-153, amending the Districts' Conflict of Interest Code State law, as resolution is to reflect legislative amendments to the recommended by the General Counsel. A certified copy of this attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. · ALL DISTRICTS Aeproving Change Order C to Purchase Order No. 15599 to Falcon Services re Specification No. s-031 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order C to Purchase Order No. 15599 to Falcon Services for Interim Out-of-County Trucking of Residual Solids, Specification No. S-031, extending the term of the required trucking services from September 15 through November 15, 1984, and increasing the total maximum authorized amount from $352,000 to $402,000. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Sludge Management Agreement with EKO Systems/Orange County, Ltd. re Specification No. S-030 Joint Chairman Edgar reviewed the history of the Districts' Request for Proposals for Offsite Reuse/Disposal of Digested, Dewatered Municipal Sewage Sludge (Specification No. S-030). The Districts received 19 proposals. He indicated that three proposals were considered non-responsive to the specifications and nine onsite proposals were also declared non-responsive by the Boards following preliminary analysis. The remaining seven proposals were thoroughly studied by the staff and a Select Committee of Directors. The most cost-effective proposal was submitted by the private sector firm of EKO Systems to reuse the sludge by producing a humus-compost end product, similar to peat moss, which could be marketed. The cost to the Districts would be $10 per ton which is less than the current method of trucking the material and co-disposing of it at a landfill. -9- 9/12/84 The Joint Chairman reported that the General Manager and General Counsel have had extensive negotiations with the proposed contractor in order to reach an acceptable agreement. The Select Advisory Committee met prior to the Joint Board Meeting and reviewed the details of the final negotiated agreement with EKO Systems. One of the important provisions of the agreement establishes a one-year time frame for EKO to complete the preliminary work required before this reuse/disposal method can be implemented, which includes acquisition of a site, compliance with all CEQA requirements and obtaining all required State and local approvals and permits. Mr. Edgar stated that it is the Select Committee's recommendation that the Board authorize an agreement with EKO Systems, in form approved by the General Counsel. He added that approving this agreement does not automatically resolve the sludge disposal issues and reiterated the milestones that must be met before this proposed method can finally be implemented. Therefore, the Committee further recommends that staff be directed to continue to explore other alternatives for the reuse/disposal of the Districts• sludge. At the request of the Joint Chairman, the General Manager then further reviewed the background of the offsite sludge reuse/disposal proposal. In November 1983, in response to the Environmental Protection Agency's Section 308(a) Clean Water Act letter, the Boards adopted a new Residual Solids Management Plan and submitted it to EPA. The short-term disposal plan was to continue· trucking material to Coyote Canyon. However, that landfill is now proposed to be closed in 1988. The long-term alternative preferred by the Board was landfill · co-disposal. An alternative to that was the private sector reuse and disposal option which is the agreement before the Boards tonight. The proposal by EKO offers certain advantages to the Districts: First, the proposed base cost is significantly less than the cost of the current District disposal method and the other proposals that were submitted. In addition, it is a reuse proposal which is environmentally desirable and consistent with the Districts' philosophyJ and, there are no capital costs to the Districts. Further, the private contractor will be required to comply with CEQA provisions, complete the EIR, and obtain the necessary permits rather than the Districts. Mr. Sylvester also reiterated, as pointed out by the Joint Chairman, that the proposal is not without major obstacles that must be overcome. Following a general discussion by the Directors, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-169 approving and authorizing execution of the Sludge Management Agreement with ERO Systems/Orange County, Ltd., in form approved by the General Counsel, as recommended by the Select Committee to Advise the Staff: and, FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be, and is hereby, directed to continue to explore other alternatives for reuse/disposal of the Districts' digested, dewatered municipal sewage sludge. -10- 9/12/84 ALL DISTRICTS Approving Agreement with John carollo Engineers to conduct a Digester Gas Utilization Study Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers to conduct a Digester Gas Utilization Study be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved1 and, FURTHER l«>VED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-155, approving agreement with John Carollo Engineers to conduct a Digester Gas Utilization Study, on a hourly-rate basis plus overhead, direct expenses and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $74,970000. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRIClS Approving Addendum No. 10 to Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. re Construction Management Services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee Report re Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for Construction Management Services and certification re Addendum No. 10, providing for additional services from September 15, 1984 through June 30, 1985, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and approved1 and, FtJRrBER ?«>VED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-156, approving Addendum No. 10 to Agreement with Butier Engineering, Inc. for Construction Management Services relating to the construction contracts for 75 MGD Improved Treatment Facilities at Plant No. 2, including Jobs Nos. P2-23, P2-24, P2-25-1A, P2-25-2 and P2-26, et al., providing for additional services from September 15, 1984 through June 30, 1985, in an amount not to exceed $48,000.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a ~ part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing charges for Class I, Class II and Class III permittees That the respective Boards of Directors adopt the following resolutions establishing charges for Class I, Class II and Class III permittees, pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities of said Districts: Dist. No. Resolution No. 1 11 84-138-1 84-144-11 Class I & II Fee Flow(*) S.S.(*) B.O.D. (*) $227.37 $65.10 230.27 65.10 $60.77 60.77 * Flow -Per million gallons of flow s.s. -Per thousand pounds of suspended solids Class III Fee Flow(*) $489.81 492.71 B.O.D. -Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -u- ·- 9/12/84 DISTRICTS 1 & 11 Receive, file and approve Interim Report of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff re change in calculating joint ownership percentage received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 1 & 11 Declaring intent to apProve an amendment to the Joint Ownership, Operation and construction Agreement Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Interim Report of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff dated August 2, 1984, recommending a change in the basis of calculating the joint ownership percentage, be, and is hereby, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby declare their intent to approve an amendment to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, changing the basis of calculating the joint ownership percentage from flow and assessed valuation to flow only, contingent upon execution of an agreement with the Irvine Ranch Water District prior to December 1, 1984, providing for the formation of County Sanitation District No. 14, and further providing that the existing Districts not incur a net financial loss as a result of said policy revision and District No. 14 formation, as recommended by the Select Committee to Advise the Staff. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 4:00 p.m., September 26, 1984, to discuss long-range financing needs. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m., September 12, 1984. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 19 - Hurst Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-157-2, ordering annexation of .607 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and country Bills Road in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 19 - Burst Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 25 - Argo Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-158-2, ordering annexation of .647 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of County Bill Road and Via Vista in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 25 -Argo Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 29 - Wiens Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-159-2, ordering annexation of .78 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 29 - Wiens Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -12- 9/12/84 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 36 - Dennis Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-160-2, ordering annexation of .830 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santa Ana ~ Canyon Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 36 - Dennis Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 58 - Tract No. 9606 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-161-2, ordering annexation of .925 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Calle Sonora and Avenida Adobe in the City of Yorba Linda, proposed Annexation No. 58 - Tract No. 9606 to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Fixing hearing re Annexation No. 41 -Tract No. 9713 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-162-2, fixing October 10, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. in the District's Administrative Office, as the date, time and place of hearing on proposed Annexation No. 41 -Tract No. 9713 to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing initiation of proceedings re Annexation No. 59 -That the Board of Directors hereby \e,J Anaheim Bills Annexation No. 9 adopts Resolution No. 84-163-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 79.86 acres of territory to the District in the Anaheim Bills area, proposed Annexation No. 59 -Anaheim Bills Annexation No. 9 to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Receive and file request for annexation from w.c. Townsend re Annexation No. 60 -Townsend Annexation Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request from w.c. Townsend for annexation of .60 acres of territory to the District located at 243 South Del Giorgio Road in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 60 -Townsend Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and referred to staff for study and recommendation. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m., September 12, 1984. DISTRICT 3 Approving plans and specifications re Contract No. 3-21-3R Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-164-3, -13- """-11 ·- 9/12/84 approving plans and specifications for Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos Boulevard, Contract No. 3-21-3R, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Receive and file Staff Report re Odor Control on the Miller-Bolder Trunk Sewer hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Authorizing Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. to conduct an odor control study re Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated August 30, 1984 relative to Odor Control on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer be, and is Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. to conduct a study of odor control methods for the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, for an amount not to exceed $18,000.00; and, FURTHER HlVEDt That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order agreement for said study upon approval by the Selection Committee. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Dir~ctors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m., September 12, 1984. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:19 p.m., September 12, 1984. DISTRICT 6 Approving agreement with the City of Newport Beach re Collection of Sewer Connection Charges Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-165-6, approving agreement with the City of Newport Beach for Collection of Sewer Connection Charges. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., September 12, 1984. DISTRICT 11 Receive and file letter from the City of Hwttington Beach re Board Appointments Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from the City.of Huntington Beach appointing Robert P. Mandie, Jr. as the alternate representative to Ron Pattinson in District No. 11 for the August 8, 1984 meeting only, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -14- 9/12/84 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of staff re Purchase Order No. 16581 to That the Board of Directors hereby National Plant Services, Inc. ratify action of staff in issuing ~ Purchase Order No. 16581 to National Plant Services, Inc. in the amount of $21,401.71 and authorizing payment of said fees for removal and disposal of oil spilled into the District's Coast Highway Trunk Sewer Siphon. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., September 12, 1984. DISTRICT 7 Making Mitigated Negative Declara- tions for the Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main and the Campus Relief Subtrunk Campus Relief Subtrunk be, and are Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written comments received from the following relative to the Mitigated Negative Declarations for the Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main and the hereby, received and ordered filed: (a) California Regional Water Quality Control Board dated August 28, 1984 (b) State of California, Office. of Historic Preservation dated August 21, 1984 FURTHER l«>VED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-166-7, making a Mitigated Negative Declaration re Michelson Relief Subtrunk and Force Main, and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination re said project. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes; and, FURTHER l«>VED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-167-7, making a Mitigated Negative Declaration re Campus Relief Subtrunk, and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination re said project. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Contract No. 7-8 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby approves Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, revising the insurance provisions, providing for clarification of several items, and transmitting a soils investigation report and various permits applicable to the project. DISTRICT 7 Receive and file letter from Irvine Ranch water District re modification of the specifications for Contract No. 7-8 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from Irvine Ranch Water District dated September 4, 1984, requesting modification of the two alternative pipe sizes to be bid for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, to better serve proposed District No. 14's needs, and offering to pay the redesign costs for said modification, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -15- ·. ·- 9/12/84 DISTRICT 7 Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications re Contract No. 7-8 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby approves Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, providing for revised separate bid schedules for modified alternative pipe sizes requested by Irvine Ranch Water District, and delaying the bid date to October 23, 1984. DISTRICT 7 Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation re design of Contract No. 7-8 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-168-7, approving Addendum No. 2 to Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, to modify the plans and specifications for said job to provide for revised separate bid schedules for the alternative pipe sizes requested by IRWD to better serve proposed District No. r41 increasing the total compensation, on an hourly-rate and expense-reimbursement basis, from $179,230.00 to an amount not to exceed $194,230.00 (said cost to be reimbursed by IRWD)7 and waiving Procedures for the Selection of Professional Engineering and Architectural Services. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ·DISTRICT 7 Ratifying action of Chairman in directing staff to issue notice to Boyle Engineering Corporation to inunediately proceed with modifications to the plans and specifications re Contract No. 7-8 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the action of Chairman in directing the staff to issue a notice to Boyle Engineering Corporation to inunediately proceed with modifications to the plans and specifications for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, to provide for revised separate bid schedules for alternative pipe sizes, in order to meet bidding deadlines, be, and is hereby, ratified. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve Staff Reeort re Electrolurgy, Inc. That the Staff Report dated September 4, 1984, re status of compliance with Amendment to the Stipulated Agreement with Electrolurgy, Inc. re Industrial Waste Permit No. 7-162, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m., September 12, 1984. Secretary, Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 -16- == :x> I ~ ::::: f UN(! t~C UARR UH NO. (:f: ~I!!~ .. llHHtl r.1-sae" l l'f,~f'~2 H6C:t•l "f:i~t·• U(·~f "b ~Mffl'U• ~6~1'-1 t'69f•t' r·~!lh~ · ~·1.~e~ a Uf,C]'l'f·l cues2 '•f· ~u: f..'\ "( ~1'5lt r.~ (',. 5~ I·(• ~f.56 r6~Pfo7 •!~ 'tl5r t·f:~fl!Cl ••c.Qt!a':.r ·7ti~8f. I C6•Ht6? H·~H! rc.'ritf;• 'I·~., (.!1 Udl4H· "li'::H1 ~·f.Cl(•ffl "''~"'':a "If,-:,. 1 Q "'· t.lll 11 f.~9R 12 ~f.9813 f6N!H ~Ei~"?t!J~ llf,C:-ti 1C: ~(.f)f 11 ~:6-?f 11t A(9P}'; "~ 'il•U J r1.':'tU ~f.C) f;(I;> !'6 9t'tl.~ ('f 'ill't!~ .( ~·q~ -JI OIS1 ut~klNG CAfl1Al f~O([SSING OAl[ 11~31~~ •AGr • arfORT NUMecr A~~' CftllNO· SAt•IT AT ION btstR•cts 0, OIUN&t tout4h ..... . VfHOOA ~&~ lLfCl. HOJf.AS 6T l 1 IHfOffHAJlbN SYSllHS AG~nsoN INrUSlPlfS, INC. ~£Rt0 C~~PPfSSCRSt lhC. lHCQICJl SCIENllflC FA~CUCT~ lh( ~HC~G~ PACKING tO. Pl~~r. r. aNO[ftSO~ ~UO£L1Cl RENTAL SCRVIC£$ A~C9 VAlVf I PRIHE~ CC~P AflU.I. l:[N CCfCP • ARRO~·RISCO, INC. 'fi~CM TRUCK 0001£$ I (OUIP"CNT -~~ou~r•o CLECIRlr COP.P. A~~OCJATfO CONCR£1£ Pt.on •• IHC 'SSOCJlTCC lleO~ATORlfS ~AK(~ PlY\CCU CO •• INC. EAN~ Of A~CPBCA NT l SA ~CCKY.&~ INSl~U~£H1~ eEcNrA~ IN~USIRB&L ~CCSCN SA~t ' ~AIYClt INC. etvcr r.1~ eoM RC~l•l c,. ~RISlOl PARK "COJCAL GAf., INC CK l>U"P ANO OEllATl'AJf4G COR~. (Pl CAllfC~~fA, INC. C-LlrOPNJI OISTRIPUTOAS CltlfOR~IA ~NVIRnN~[Ht~l C[NTU~' SCRVICC CO. flUMO[R•tlU ('OHCPUC1 urr.. CUEVAOtt u.s.A., ltJC. cu~~CLIV&l(O fl[CTPICIL DlfJ. CC1U lllUUL fll[HfC.-l C'O COC~[~ EHCPGY ~lRVICCR COSJA M[Sl •UIO ~1i1s. •~c. f \>UHTY VI Cf IHC C'Ulrl$ llNr SEPVICl t•VALS 'AllS CG~f&NY C.R. DIVIS FUFflY C6. tEC" on.r.o uu s ?CU·HI ,YSTUiS, UIC. CIC:KSOHS ~If lll•FO A~SOCl~Trs ronAOO ENlC~rRISCS. INC. OU~tt tr~IPP~ cr~f. 1 As ' ,, ar: • 1 u· • .. •• • CLAIHS PAID Jl/1118• . AIU>UNJ $115.33 -. '"'· 05 u ,,3,.30 UR•&' . Uo\~.~2 '1 tM2. a~ ·un.65 &U·1.'l~ UiUe.J6 Uh$U.53 tlO.t\I · nu.u U !JS. 70 1.951)~U S210.l'O U6,.tt8 '2t 118eU t3'l·U uu.n ... un.u U9le!'3 ,,.,.,o.oo ·s55,.10 UJ121t5.Ql uoo.n U5!1o58 f.15~.,. '21968.00 SltlU.62 U3tlU.10 U19U.2(1 · 11;99a.ao u.111.6? un.H S2CJ.91 ( H ,,'lfte19 "''3. u ·nu.u Hl5.Q8 Sl'Jo\•l~ . t5 IJ~U ·u"··u u' ·~· .. 3~ SP. • .-").bO ... ... ~9.49 •tn~.u Of.SCklPI ION TOOLS TEL£;HON£.iQUIP. LEASE TAUCIC PAAIS COHPRESSOR ¥ARTS LA8 EQUl;ffEHT HAIMT£HANC£ PUHP PARTS COHfEAENCE EXPENSES ... iowiL AENTAi VALVES Cff£HICAL COACUlAITS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TOOLS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ....... iuhoiNG iiAiiilAlS LAI ANALYSIS LU"BER iRAVEL u11usu ELECTRICAL SUP,LllS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES . • &&iii.DING MATERIALS .. ELECTRIC CARI PARIS TRASH DISPOSAL PAE EHPlOYtttkT fXAHS RETENTION PV-09, woao PROCESSOR HAllTENANCE, SUPPLIES SHAll HARDWARE . PIPE SUPPLIES £HCIHE PARTS IUllDIHG HAtERIAlS GASOLINE, ENGINE Oil El£CTAICAL SUPPLIES CtllOUNE . . . . . . ENCIH PARTS UUCK PARTS HUCK PAATS TRUCK llAES PIPE SU,,LIES SHEETING . ElJCTRICAl SUPPLIES EHG INE PARTS COHPUifi PROGRAHMlllCo. SUPPOAT shvaus Off ICE SUPP LIU OFFICE fORHS,· SUIPLllS INLET GAtE lEPAIAS PAINT $UPPLI ES OFFICE SUPPLIES I w .(. ::: )> I N ::: .. ( .. , ·( ( FUtm NCI IJ l A A ~tit tJ ! • U~PPf' {lf•9PFf, '?I.·~ 14~1 ·i~~f.i.'f 1(.lff'l'I\ : (.4?tc.•, ~ f•~'~SJ t:'!'H"?'. ft-~-,~~ (I(. Of!~' ':!-':1.f\95 U~(l'i6 r~~ A~ 1 (( ;p~q f.f ~8~':' ~·~?~f" t16': t;f l ~ ,,,..r.r:' 'f.C':ff"! .. .;oc;t•4 ~~~'.'~!> •'!6C.~ •• ~ nf~"'U r l,C': ~ flf. Of'":l 0 "l(,'jCJ',. l'E,C'"ll (If.~-=? 2 !'~i1~c P. ~f.~~ l't ~~OflJ~ S:H9lf ('6~·«; 17 ··~ ~· ~i ••• r(,'l'1D r.1. ~ 0 ,,,. 'Jf ~~~· i;1.c;~n f.t6C~~! f! ~ ~'l ~. r~qq?~ .. ,. c:~''~ '~.a~;: 1 ,.E·:''.i;>r ' ( lt'et~.o "L ~~ r i.' 99ar -JI rlSI UCPklNG (if ltll rPOC[SSJHG OAl[ 1/UJ/~~ PAGC ~ RFPORJ NUffS[~ AP-3 COUHt• SA~l14f JC'U b8S1~1t1s 0.f ORA~Gt tbu~ty vrNOl'ft Cl'.CJRIC HACHlflOY ft'Ffe CO. C~r.tUNl£Rt INC. f lCJC~Y PEfRCSl"JAllVr. •~c. rALCON OISFOSAt Sf.PYJCr rrrr.R1L cr~AEss cnAr. r 1c:11r.R coniou rL&T \ V[qTICAl CO~CRllC ~L~IC Hl~Cll~G SYSTl~St l~t. VAL FOTI• & SOJlS FOUHIAlff VAllCV cArr~a fRbll GROM[RS lA~OP4JOPYt INC. F~lllRJCN MFG. C~. Gl'A~L lU'P(P co. G(N£R•l 1£L[F~OUC CC. ~P.AveAP CLfCIRIC co. Ht" Ol[Sfl H•CHIU~ HANK•S Cl[CT~tCiL ~~PPllt' l•OlfSC er f.All(r.I[~ fit~IUPO SUPPLY en. r.. S • hlJGttCS CO•• UIC • CllY OF HUNflNGION ~l£CN t•utn INGIC?' UUCtl 11Ul'OCl1 n At'r t·Uta l,NUO' SUH'U f'Y!'Rr.K llEJ ICS l~!Al f.A~OUSJ co. •~rr.RIAL ktSr r~r"ltll co. ·~~USfPIAl •srH~lf IN~~Sf~l•l lffR(AO[U PROOUCJ5 J"'iP•t< f:.Aflft IHlChOJf AMC~ICA lAVlh~ PAtCH UAlrR nlsT~lf J ,1r l CO• t I NC • l<.r. .c. fOl'FltfY HllY flJ'l CO. KIN~ ~[AklHEt INC. Krn~1 •UHP ' fCl.CUIHr ltOflf~ I .• I! • U. ~ • t I NC • llf[C(U'-S~f[TY ~ffV ICI !l'Hl Y ll~~,.~c CISlRJ~llOF!• •~c. tu~ •N~(L(S CHlMICAL r.n. l~~ ANGCL[S GAlVAUJZING cq. lU~~V l A~~UCIAf[~ I. YU!!' U. l'l SlCl!C If V, Utt• r,llJH"l~CUSTAI[~. J~r. ~•fl -f~l9~, IUf. 1tcr·•!llP·c11-:r1 surr·1v er,. . , . CLAJHS PAID ~Jiil/-' AMOUNJ uu.u ·· s!.uo.u - 16511.'90 Ut9A9.6• AH5.1'l uu.~s '195.oo st.U.56 .. S9e•192e62 123'.5• · Uf .. U .. Sl'fle U Sltll.'8ef'5 h' t.1' ~,,e.n .. ,,..~, .. ,U.llo U •llite28 u.,n.e• he6L•9••~ ''·'' 'fa'·""· s;&.0 6 suo.s~ Si! t 50e 00 h.~1,.H .. t;»A.33 OU.91 ~.n1.~1 · 111,1.a".5~ '"·°' .. UtlU.H ss3,us.n 1 na .o Ue9U~J5 12· 186.~' 11{'9 •• , . Bf..n '"'"·'·' u.11n.2u !60.U u. Jlele 12 SI , 'l'1111 • ., ~ •"'· 2P. u.a~e.1s t-·I ·.ft~ · aut" 1 "ti (It. ENGINE PARTS . OCEAN -HONITORIND SAFETY SEMINAR lEGISTIATION SLUDGE DI SPOSAl DEllVHY SEIVI CE HGULATOI PARTS COICRETE CUTTING ELECTllCAl'SUPPllES RETENTION PV•I09 Fil" PROCESSING, OFFICE SUPPLIES LAI ANALYSIS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT SHALL HARDWARE, IUllDING HATERIAlS ~· .. ·--··-· TELEPHOH . . . PAGER SUPPL I ES TRUCK REPAIRS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES IATTEIUES GAUGES. SHALL HARDWARE ... SAFETY SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE OFF I CE SUPPll ES SHALL HARDWARE PUMP PARTS SAWDUST FERRIC CHLORIDE IUllDIHG HATERIAlS SHAU HARDWARE JANITOllAl SUPPLIES HYDROGEN PEROXIDE VATH USEACE TRUCK PAATS ... CONTRACTOR J-2~-I, CSDOC Ill SEWER REPAIRS PIPE SUPPLIES BEARING SUPPLIES PUKP PAlllS WELDING SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPL I ES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES HEH IC IDES PIPE SUPPLIES EHGR. llJ fORHAllON PLANT IZ SECURITY PATROL TRUCK' PARTS PIPE SUPPLIES SHALL HARDWARE .. ••• :::: :t> I ~ :::: f Ut~D t.C: 91S~ -JJ ~l~f VOP~ING C~tl1Al . FP~C[SSIHG OAJf 1/~~18• ~A•~ ~ U .A P. R t. P.' 1 tU • f•E-::.~.aa '?f. ')'43:' ff~'!~ &"(:~Cf~· !'"~·~:.~ ·~f·~'l~I ((·1~'7 !'~"c ~I' !00(.Cl'l,!; '·' ,. ~ c: ta ~· •'f q~ ta J -:,: t;a4~ •:1.c1:11a' ~f."~~q ft(·C:~o\!· f ~.~'I·! !'(.r..~• 1 I'(. ··~1tt· '·'"q~·~ :-i.~q~;, l (. ~1 'J!_. I ~(;.~C'I~.:' II(; r, 'lf .. ~ "(JC'D9'ta '.(.OC1~ t; i:f.0~!6 f f,C~! 1 "/C.C::!:f: :'f.0'1~~· N°~91·•· :.t ~"I· I PfC!-, .. ('/.r.~{' ':!-r~1.4 ~~1~6!' ' I· c-~l:! "~:. •~o~. '1 !/,O~ff. •·f: ff~lf,U C·•·"~ liJ :-cr·nJ ':f-•.C.}jl ••• *;~7! ".'1·'"7'1 f·t, •.J a 7'• .. ·~ •: .! 11: ( RFFO~T UUMO~P lP•l lOUtll\' SAHITITION *'* sttalct'S of: OliANGt COUNh ClAJns rAI~ JJ/111~• . VCtUlOR ~C,SUP[M[NT VAPIAf.lCS Hcc~ANICAl ~RIVCS co. ~I~[ S~F£1Y ,.PFll~NC[S co. F" ~UL ,. • M ll CHCll r.o•u 1 o. 1t1c. t'Ctlf C:Of'CP. Y [l[VA J(aP COtiP ~NY ~OOFf JQOCtC1S co. ~~~~AN CRANC co., l~C. f .~. ~CRl1Z fOU~CRY ~P l~Sl~UYChlSt IUC. l 1 A llCUL SAFCl Y CCl!hC IL i.n: tt£ P.ffU • IHr.. ~f MP<'P 1 f.'R Um ftr.IOUOl Cll[f.ICAl cor.-. ntv~rf( C~E"ICtl co. ·~~~'( COC~IY FAPM sutrlt fb. ~q~NLE VALVI a f llJIHr. co. ~S1£PS&UCR COHFhlS~DR S£PVIC£ fJ)IY{;fll ~CS.VJCE f(,l'tllY er tUNH 1· AC If IC S af[TY HU Jf~ENl Ct"• U('lf IC EUL r·,\~CAL ~ LCDUI(; trA1, r4AUICK. "''c~rLL ' rn. ~ICKUIC~ PAPCR rt~OtCT~ 1· 1111r. v r.o"r.~ rtiHt SlRVICFS• IHt. f.•(lf; ff4Atl(fa rAPOlP PRJRROSf ICf a~1~1R1c cc~ru1r~ ~vs1r~s 1111. Pl. G ISi flt wr rcnMlf SUfFlr ro. er CALIF., INC. f'(fll\INS I. fl{Y[PS S "• .J C .. CVf:OlfJ Uf ~If[ UJC. ~U.tfOAl't rnc. ~u.cc.11 1t1c. ~a~p CCll~R PUSl~lS~ f9RNS f tUJA AIJA ~lUt PPl~J COe :iAtlT A /.Ille (\fa('G[ SA~T-~NA [llCTP.IC ~otr.~r SC4n~. ROCFUCK i c~. Slit.ttP<'Ck SUPPLY 1•.c. Sl'llll CO .. ~HWrHl;U f:(). ~flUlM r.o&st ~H 1n uu1rr.(fl• SO. C~llf. CO-~IAL ~A~rr RESEARCH PROJ!CJ .. AttOUNI · Sit ll 1•89 'A&t.56 U28e66 '2•. 0'> un~.!58 U2'l·U ,,.2.rf\ &251i.h $~h87'te6P. U tl'Jfie 15 uoo.u u•o.91 · l2•A51.•~ hti61etf9 UfhU7.55 Ul1.U U9•·•2 11u; n U'1•2~ hiUa.~? .. , ••• r. 1125~~· '3t14R,'lll\ u1.u2.JG snn.111 U1.ti• U1C5CJ.U Ut It'~. llU in.10 S15,.'!t' u ...... u,5u.s' 15"5·•• •'512.0 se;,. • c~ .11 el~•.so u 39ol.StJ. eo U,9.98 UloU UH.fJf' tCJ;n.M: SA tlH.o• S.21!'. • 1 S312~0.11~ S3 •• I\~~. IP { '·f'".'eP~ nrscR IF 11 ot. £l£CTAICAl SUPPLIES tNGINl PAllU SAFETY SUPPLIES, TUBING SEHINAR EXPENSES PUMP •AUS PLANT IZ ELEVATOR HAINT£NANCE VALVES tRAHE ,AATS ftAHHOLE llMGS AND COVERS PIPE SUPPLIES AHNdAl HtHillsklP FtE SHAU HARDWARE USE CUAftGE OYERPAYHENT CAlJSTtt: SOtiA CHLORINE lAHOSCAPIHG SUPPLIES ~ALVU COHPRESSOI PARTS DEHURRAGE, OXYGEN TANKS SUAVEY )-2,-1, ~Al !KPLOYMEHT lXAHS SAf ETY SUPPL I ES TEUMEJUING PW·099 UPAIAS 1'8J-8• AUDIT EXPENSES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ... POSTAGE HETH HHTAl PV•097 AEPAllS, COAST TIUHK SEVER REPAIRS POSTAGE IHDUSTAIAl VASIE SAHPLIHG ICE VASTEHAUlER STATION PIOGRAftMING LEGAL ADVERTISING Pl PE SUPPll £5 .PUMP PARTS TRUCk PARTS flECTRICAl ~UPPllES SOlVUITS CONTRACTOR 1·2R·2SJ OFFICE fOlftS llUEPAINTIHG TRUCk PAITS ELECTRIC HOJOR PARTS TOOLS TOOLS, HOH P2-2J-6 STbP NOTICE RELEASE TYPEWRITER HAINTEHANCE 0 OFFIC~ EQUDPHEMl DEEP OCEAN SlU?GE 11>!,~,POSAl STUDY .( ::: :c::- 1 .:::-::: ( FUNr1 t.o VAPRMH ta('. ( ... I• ~.,~ -Jl ~IST ~on~•N~ ClfllAL fP~CCSSIHG O~Tr 1/t~IP• PA~f RrrOAT ~UHOCA AP•! Cl\UH1Y s.AtHIAtlllH DUfPltU Of -OUtaGl tblttlU Cl~I~~ PAID ~111118• VEfllUlft ~t•Ufll£AN CU IF• [:JI SOtl C<'• so. fAllf. VAJF.F to. ~OUlHC~N COUNllli ~IL CG• SOP.OU SHU AMOUIO lltsCRlFtlOH POWEi VATH USEAH DIESEL FUEL STHL STOCK ., l!( aq 11 ~·"??1r ., f· 9Ci 1'? • ~C' 'Ill :1 l'.!c.~921 "~'l~r.: ''(l~~': ~ ':E~~H ~6~1if'C. lftJ" SUFF·l It: RS J. U~YNC SYLV[Sff P TU~MIS 5CIEtlllf IC U.SJt8J5.5~ u~.3P S6t2RO.~O .1111.~n tt."5lel5 u.1111.93 un.11 . U3,.b0 SffAll HARDWARE, SAFETY SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIHBUASEHENT ".'H~~f. ti(.~?i\1 ('C.99AJt ilH9U'? .. ~Q~f),1 "f,C.C;fq l ·~~~·c;q, ~6 c-; q~ C6~?C: .. N,•1c;;n~ "(·~C'1?(. C.~f,CGf. J ( (1?",, .. 11 (y '.: •1 ~I\ ~·1!• !J( TRAFFIC CC~lROl SC~YIC(1 l~C. '"'~SAH£Rit• OlLJVALt l~C. JfUVCl lRAV[L TRUC~ l AUtn SUPPLY, IHC. J.G. IUC~ER ' SOht INC. UNll[O P~ACfl SlRVICC Y" P. ~ C IE ti ti f'l.C VlllfY Clfl(S ~UPf lY CG. ~·~ING rPEJGHl SYStr"s• •~c. UAllACC t llCRN'N ,IO'tfl P • &UPllS UAUk[5HA CN~lNE $[PYIC[N1Cf. Mr~tfAH ST•tls OllFIClO PP~b. U~Sf IQGHOLSE [l[CJPIC cnRf ,.t:P.O~ CORP. GCORGC Y•-OltY 'SSOCIAl!S '21~ tEr.POP•RY rCRSO~Nfl IOl•t CLAIMS PAI~ ~l/1118• U •671.~P u~1.oo u ,r,,, .• ~ •eu.u us.12 uu.~~·· •~so.ea ~UO••- iihlJO.ii;f . t~U. 'JO '2tff31.)3 i'5.6i - '218.H n20.s1 llt25;.,t .~651.61) --··-~----------- SH9t"16e51 ==========~====== SUHHAR~ fHOUN~ Ill OP£i FUHQ '·)ia•11' 12 OPU FUND . . • IJ OPE• FUND '2•.sa I) F/R FUND 0,99,:16. 15 O~ER FUND J0,.10 15 f /R FUND 5.86 16 OPER FUND . 20.JI I' OPER FUND 2 Bot.it I I I bfh FUHb · 1:;n· 21 llJ ACO FUND , , • ' IJ'' O~tR FUND J,879.60 15'6 OPER FUND 815.05 ,,,7 OPER FUND . J.o,a.2• JT OPtR tUHD J6),)22.92 CORF 2,7,8J&.9• JT WORKING CAPITAL FUHD ,,,911.IS TOTAL ClAIHS PAID 07/11/8, $7 .. , ... 76.SI 'A I • 11. lAI SUPPLIES SAFltY SIGHS . ENGINE a PARTS AIA FARE · nuu uns ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES DELIVERY SERVICE lAd SUl'PllU VALVES fAEl&HT ~tAllt.tfflOllOt PUMPS ODOR CONSULTANT ENGINE PARTS llECtAICAl SUPPLIES .ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFF ICE SUPPLIES VALVES • TEHPORAAY HELP ( .. ::: t.d I ........ ::: f UNC NO MARflANJ NO. Cl7C'Ol 5 fJ7Q•'1E- l'J(1017 nn.ou Ulf.019 C10020 07C'021 01tl'J22 01i)Q23 OJC•U• G10025 01001' 6H' 1)21 ".171'028 01(:029 n (•1)3n 07'J031 "7032 "7!l'!3l (t 1(; 0 l~ non~ nu.u tllU.H 01"030 07U.1' rJOO<\O lllOC•I nc:.i·u E1tOU OOclO nr.ou l!l('~U f.7&0~ 1 t7nta~R l'70CO nu.so '!10051 07(1652 ft1•l053 UOP5• C1t'C55 '>100!,6 (116l\5J 010058 "1U!i9 OJt\dEO ( 9199 • JJ Ol~T _UORklNG CAPITAL FROC[S~BNG OAJC ,,.,,a. rAGC · icPoi r iau.tei:i aru COUNIY SANITAllON DISTRICTS OF O~ANGC COUNTY CLAlHS PAlp Dl/25/84 YE NOOR AGk Cl[CJPONJCSe IHC. •• s.u. ACHC INOUSTRIAl SUPPLY co. AiR to~oitiONJNG SPCCIALfl[S AIR FROOUCJS & Cff["JCAlSt INC. AIR PROOUCJS & C~CHICALSelNCe All•St•IE VEHICLCSt INC. AlLICO CLEClRONICS ALLICD SUPPLY ro. AfflRICAk C~CHicai SOCIC1Y JHE ANCHOR PAC~ING COe A~G[LICA RENTAL SCAVICCS •PCO VALVC i P~IHCR COPP AQUA OCN COllPe ARRO~·P.ISCOt INC. ASSOCIAJlCN OF HCTROPOLiTAH·SEVERAGE AGEHCliS AUTO SHOP EOUIPH£NT COe AZON CORP. nc INOUSlRUL SUPPL" INC. . 8~Nk OF AHCRIC' Nf I SA 8£CKHAN INOUSIRIAL BltRlY i ASSOCtAJCSe INC. OlUC DUMOND HOCRULS SONNCVlllC CQUIPet INC. 80YlC ENGINlCRING CORF THC SUAkE COHPANY CPI CAlJFORNIAe INC. CS COMPANY CILIFOANIA CNVl~ONHENTAL CARHCNIU fORO IRUCK SALCSt INC. JOHN CAROLLO CNGINEERS COAST INSURANCE AG[~CY COIJ D~ArCRY SCRVJC[ COHFRCSSOR l INCUSiRIAL ENGINE SUPPLY CONSOLIOATCb CL£C1RICAL DIST. CONS~llOAl[O fRCIGHTUAYS CON~OLIOA1[0 REPPOOUCTIO~S C:ONJROLCO coorc~ £HEAGY SCRVIC[S COA[•ROSION PROCUCTS COSlA HCSA AUTO PIRJSe INCe CRANE VE.YCR CORP. tRO~N fCNCf & surPlY co •• INC. CAL CONSOLIDAJCO UAlER SJAff Of C•llfO~NIA SlJtt OF CAlltORNIA .. 'a. ( A"OUNf ····~' .. U51.36 UJU.95 in6.ai uu.u U26eU ai.na.u sa1.u uu.u· i28.oo su•.H SIO'J. 00 s1u.1t9 U5t183el• U32e99 i6.QQO;Otl S251eH uae.110· uaj.u U98e84 Ue3UeU tsso.va suo.u uoo.oo uo.ou.u . $59.02 u.oa,.u · i2oo. 3 i ,.,e.u SU.85 u;.1h.9a *lh&Js.oo U8l e60 s•,2~s.30 · 1q39.33 S51e58 "•"''·'1 S.~G5.~7 .. ~ ·~ •!"··~' sn,na.et uu.02 SlUe55 u.101.'" $206.,8 S6t5l'le99 h~b.oa OCSCAIPTION £iiciaicAL surPi.i£s LAI SUPPLIES VElDINC SUPPLIES AIR coH01i1011NG su;rLtEs ElECTllCAL SUPPLIES · SPECIALTY CASES VEHICLE LEASE ElECIRICAL SUPPLIES PI PE SUPPLIES Ua suiicilhlON PIPE SUPPLIES TOWEL AHTAL VALVE SUPPLliS Cff£HICAl COAIULAMTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ANHUAi HEHBEASHIP FEi TRUCk PARTS Of FI CE SUPPll ES SHALL HAiDVARE TRAVEL EXPENSES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES voiitis• tohP. A0Hi1ns11A101s IUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRICAL REPAIRS ENGR. 7-1· LUHIH WORD PROCESSING HAINTEHANCE pa;£ su;iliEi Pl PE SUPPLIES TAUU PAATS ENGi. Pi-26, P2·2A, ;9-21 INSURANCE PAEHIUHS DRAPERY CLEANING ENGilii iArtts ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FREIGHT BLUE;RINT lEPRODUCiiol CONTROL EQUIPHENT EHCINE IEPAlllS FERRIC CHLORIDE STOAACE TANk HUCk f AITS HEAVY EQUIPHENT SUPPLIES tHAtN likl FEHct•G RESIN TANK EXCHANGE, VAYll SOFTENER 1,IJ-8, SALES JAX LIAlllllY · A~Nt~Atjo~ ,,, ~~OtfSSING FEE . ~ .( RUT Al ::: to I N ::: ( FUND HO YARRANl "0• C)10061 noon 0101!63 P1006~ fa1Q065 nno1.6 07(\061 070068 Cla.ll6' 01 Ol'JO 010011 0711012 UlOill~ 01001• UU3lf\ '>79 016 noon 076Gl8 Ut.019 C!7Gtlt'O (fJ &J~Pl l''h9ft4> IJ UOIU '(IJC06o\ 1)1(. '6!a 070Cl'6 fr10(J8J 9100 .. 0 l'l'JOP9 01cno Ufl09l t.70092 CJlOC93 01 ""'~ 07f'095 no 09t- l!un1 67"f'98 0Htl'9 070100 '>71'1Cl CJCl lf)" OJl'IU 0101(1., 0701•15 OU106 ·( '199 • JT OISJ UCRKING C•PIJAl ,. PROCCSSING.DA1C . l/lt/8~ PAGC R[PORt NUftB[R AP'l ( ~ COUNlY SAHllAllON OISfRICTS OF OPANG[ COUNIY ¥£NOOR STAIE Of CAllfORNii SIAJ[ or CALIFORNIA SIAIC Of CAllfOPNIA DANIFLS tlAt SCRVicr OAON CORPORATION PElEA c. OAYIO CO. DA YT ON f GUNDRY OCCO l\El U Sci£NTIFIC bJGIDY~E fOHPUf(R SE,~ICCS OORAOO ENICRPRISCSt INC. ORIV£A 1C!11NG f.lNICR OUHAS DIESEL INJ[CllON DUNN CO~AAOS C~AP. CASlMAfh I ht. CffCCilYE visUAL •"•GCRY ClCClROUIC BALANCING CO. [NVIRONHENIAL RCSOURC[ Assoc. FALCON ois~OSAL sc~v1ct f IOCP.GUJ[ CORP. HICHACL J. f ILCCCIA FISCHER i ro.-1tR co. f ISllCA COHROLS flAJ & V£RllCAl CONCR[JC rRUIJ GP.OMEPS lA80RAJORY1 INC. CITY Of fULLERION G&C P[AOY fflXCO CONCRClE G~t lRUCK I to,cH GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. f :UO GCORG( co. TO" GER LI t.G£R GOULD, INC. GRAY8A~ CllCTRIC CO. hAMRINbt~i INOU~TRIAL PLASTics HARTZELL f AN H[Al ANC POWER COUIP"CNl CO. ~.s. HUGHES co •• iNc. ClfY Of HUNTINGfON BlACH llUNTINUOfi DUCH RUUD SUMP ~UNf INGJO~ SUPPLY HURLEY CLCCIRONICS1 INC. JSCO COffPJNY IOEAL SAUOUSt CO. IH~CRIAl ~CSI CHEMICAL co. ING[RSOll-~AND co.-f CSO INStAU"C~JAllOH & ~EC~ANICAL ClA~~~ P~I0°Q1/2518• AHOUNT i160. 00 Sl60eOG 1160. OD ,,,.,3 u.ou.11 u • .su.20 '839.65 U6le30 un.'5 ai.026.oa 161.00.00 ue.oo u.u2.90 Ut'68e20 S~l1e?4 uu.10 su.so 1244 .so s3i,,u.u '88.36 su.u s2.11~.13 $283.52 1325.00 Ul'·OO uu.113 1695.63 ilh160eH S9e2Ue58 SJ t855e00. su.ss 119.H. *'••~•a 112.33 U e5U.9" S111'5eH · n11.h '6e376e08 u2a.20 H.Se92 "·'' 1 no.11 · si ,212.00 S1t520e'f~ o, U5.QQ u,000.00 t• •.••• O[SCR IP 11 ON AM11xAT10• 1ios •Aoc1ss1•c FEE ANNEXATION 110,.PftOCESSING FEE AHHEXAllON 1110 PROCESSING FEE iRuca iiats ANNUAL PAYHENT-111 CANYON SEWER PROJECl CONTRACTOR PW-102 CHA hi ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES HINi COHPUTER HAIHTEHAHCE PV-IJI REPAIRS DRIVER EXAHS i•siit1 iEPAiis PAINT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES . ······~: -;1Ui fftotUs1ila SCROLL IALAHCIMG l~~ ~NA~ys~~1 .PE~T~CiOES SLUDGE HAULING/DISPOSAL FREIGHT EMPLOYEE HILEAGE riH su;;uis REGULATOR PARTS CORE Dlll Lll NG LAI ANAL YS is WATER USEAGE BUILDING MATERIALS FLAT-BED .TRUCK TELEPHONE ElECTAICAl SUPPLIES EHPLOYEE HI lEAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES IATTUIU sttAll ttAliovAH . ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES All CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE sAntw SUPhih VATH USEAGE OFF I CE SUPPL I ES SHAU. itAAovAU ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTROL EQUIPHEHT \iooo SHAVINGS FERRIC CHLORIDE PUHP ilovti SYSTEM atPAtas :::: o:t I \J..J :::: UNO NO ARRANi ,.,0. OlOUl n~aon nJOH9 010110 l'l{tlJJ 010112 tJnt tl OUIH 01l'lJ5 070116 010111 C'JGIJ8 I'} fl 11 't ~10120 1'1Cl21 010122 070H.S r.7012' f.1'112~ 07(112& IHOl21 'IJn 128 07fo129 Q1U30 P1Cl31 U}l:J32 Oltl~l uu 13~ nJOl.!5 0701.!6 OlOllJ 010138 C101l9 01u41) 07CJUI e7UH2 d79H~ t.7<'10 nnJ.,5 01"1U ODlU lUClO 'l7CH9 010150 '-1Ul~I f1" I f.2 9199 -JJ Dist UCAKIH6 CAPITAL . PROC[SSIN6 DAit 1/1°18• P•Gr ~ ( . . . -RlPO~t NU~B[~ AP~3 COUNfY SANllATION OISJRICIS OF ORANGE COUNTY ClAlffS P~I~ OJ/a51ft• VENDOR INlCAOJr ar.n1CA THC IRVINE Co. rnc IRVINE COHPArn iRYtNC l~DUSTRIAL LAHOSCAPC IRVINE SUC[PIN~ SE~VICC 8.P. JOHN HAULING KAS SAfClY 'ROOUCTS KELLY f'IPC co. KCNNCOY/J[NKS CNGIN£EPS KING BCARiNGt INC. KIPST PU"P & HACfflNC UORKS t<LCCN•L INC CORP RODIN t<UHNK( LA HOJJE CHEHICAL PRODUCIS LAU~SCN CCLOR LAB LCUCO tLtCJRJC CO. llGHIJNG DIST~leUtOASt INC. K.p. LINDSlROHt INC. LOURY & ASSOCIATCS LYONS IN1'L SECURITYt INC. ~ANNING l[CHNOLOGICSt INCe HAAVAC CLCCTRONICS VONDA HCGC[ rtCkCSSGt. CUE"1Ul CO. MCHASllR-CARR surPLY co. "INC SAFC1Y AFPLIANCCS co. GEORGE ~ n!.~O~GAN COet lhC. ,.Of OROlAe INC. HULC EH[AGENCY LIGHTING CO. NATIONAL LU"OER SUPPLY NAJiONIL SANliARY SUPPLY CIJY Of NEUPORI DCACH A.J. H08l[ COHPANY 0.1.s. oisfRIBUlOAS OCCIOCNJAl CH[HICAL CORP. fAANK A. CLSCN CO. OlYHPi C CllCHI CAL CCI• OHICAOH U[lOING sutrlYt INC. can OF ORANGE OSllAUAUCA COH~A[SSOR SERVICE OOGCN SERVICE COU~IY Of ORANG£ COUNIV SAN!TAilON OISTPICIS Of ORANGE COUNTY ORlNGC COUNTY VAJ(R DISTRICI 'ACIFIC H081lf Off ICES f ACO .. A"OUNT u,aa;.l• s12,n1.21 Sl6e'U8.62 ssi2.oo SU9.00 "''·'° ·uu.io Sh912eU U3t2He08 sie3'J.5i SH9e 16 $183.11 '8•1.18 '159.:U UU.97 i6d. J3 Sl e293e63 u,en.a3 n,•il.oo Sl.998.110 u ,,68.28 S53.3• '26.30 u-1993.61 SI •1.29 U•6He61 u .u •• 30 09.82 U e3.!6o9l S425o~· U26.~9 su.5, u,200.oa s165.a3 l•e806.09 u,12e.:u uo.•92.21 uo.11 · 12o79'fe28 i5'U.5f) U19e9~ '699.93 16, 139.u $603.68 S150.lj2 s1d.93 ( OUCR IPI ION HYDAOGlN PEROXIDE AHHUAl 118 CANYON SEVER PROJECT PAYHENT llG CANYON INTEREST PAYHEHT PLANT Ii HAiHiENANCE PLANT SWEEPING SERVICE VOOD SHAVINGS SAFETY su;PLiu ·PIPE SUPPLIES E~GR. ~W~9~1~. _ IEARIH SUPPLIES PUHP PAIJS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES LIABILITY CLAIH SETTLiHEHl LAB CHEMICALS fllH PROCESSING ElECTRiC CART PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OCEAN WAl,EA STUDY, IELT FILTER PRESS SlUOY EHGR. Z·IO·IA PLANT 12 SECURITY PATROl PIPE SUPPLIES ELiCTRiCAL SUPPLIES EHPlOYU HIUAr.E CHLORINE SHALL HARDWARE SAFETY SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PW-106 ELECTRICAL SUPPLliS IATHRIU SHAll ~AROWAR£, LUHBEI JAHITOllAl SUPPLIES VATH USEAGE CSDOC fJ."~N~O~~ AJ,~AIRS LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES CAUSTIC SODA VALVES CHLORINE WELDING SUPPLIES CSDOC 17 SEVER PURCHASE COMPRESSOR PARTS SPECIALTY GASES A~HU~Jl~H HAP~,. PllE·EffPLOYHENT UMtS: ftEPLEHISH WORKERS' COHP. FUND WATEA PRODUCTION PLANT 12 TRAILER AENJAL PUMP ;MtTS t ... .( - ::: t:d I ...s:::-::: ( rurm t10 U'PRANT NO. 010153 n ells~ 01tl5S Q1 (6J Sf. 070157 070158 "10159 070U.O 010161 ueu2 07(; If,) UUF• ti 10lf!: CHl66 076U7 07"1U 010164? l)Jf; 110 010111 011' l 12 011!173 07017• 070115 010176 00111 07U78 070179 nnit?9 flOlf'I U'llU 07l'IU '11911'• P7C'la~ o u a~' 'HOl81 01 (ti (l8 r1 1can n70 I "0 07U9l f.llil92 91l'l'13 OllJI ,, noac;s Olr.196 n~u1 01Ol9(t '( .. 9199 -Jf PISI UCRKING CAPllAL FROCCSSIN~.OAIE 11191~• PAGr • R£POPT NUHSCR AP•l COUNIY ~A~lfATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGf COUNIY ' CLAIMS PAI~ 01/2518• VCNOOR PACIFIC SAFC1Y [QUIPH£NT CO. PAC IF IC 8Cll FARIS UNLIKllCO J.H. PEJEAS to., RNC. PICKWICK PAPER PROPUCTS HAROLD PlllKROS( ICC R-INOOU DISPOSAL CO. RAl~JR[C CCMPUIER SYS1CMS THC llCGIS1U TttC iiEGistCR ROBBINS & "UCRS ~O~CRTSffAU CONTROLS CO. SAtH;OAM, iNC. UNCON INC. Clf Y OF SANTA AN' .. YVONNt sckdb SCARSt ROEBUCK & co. sec OPTICS SitAHROCK SUPPLY SHALL •usJN[SS REPOPl SHllH FIPC I SUPFlYt INC sb. tbASJ AIR QUAlllY HANAGEHl~T blst••ct SOUTH COAST Off ICl [OUIPHENJ SOUTflCRN Ullf • COISON CO. so •. CAL. GAS co. SOUIHCRN C6UHTl[S Oil co. SPARKL£11S DRINKING UAJ[R SICEl tXCffANGEt INC. J. VAYNE SYLVCSJ[~ fCTKOt INCe tHOMAS SCICNllFIC JONY'S LOC~ & SAFE SEAYICC tOf 42 CLCCIPONICS lRAN5ArCRiCA OClAVALt INC. TUYrL BUFFS llUVfl 1RAVCL lRUCK ~ AUTO SUFflYt INC. VNICO ClCClfllC UNION Oil CO. ~f CALIF. UNltEO P-RCr.l SERVtcc UNlllD STAllS COUIPft[Nf COet INC. vvn SC ICNt IF IC ~ALVt & SltEl SUFPll CO. VAUGHAN'S INOUSlRIAL ACPAIR CO Voto HACHJNE CARl UARREN & CO. 'a I AnOUNT S'80e96 sit.26 u21.n Ut029.;l u11.3s $?ie011 uu.oo nso.ao S2t152e99 uh.32 1238.09 S6ft'5e0l u,,u.e9 · u 1575.00 U28el5 "aih2e . H5.91 193j. 00 166 •• 93 '5fu00 su1.u iiu.oo n1.n U02t5Uel1 l16t612·'6 S6t024e't' ·aan.no &9Q9.S• 15~6·58 161 eU 156.U us.sa n.n.20 . Slt26'·U sne.oo Hetao.u UtH•a.10 S6l9eJ2 Sl51eH n1.n 1590.02 nu.55 Ut82l·16· SleHl•OO S.Ulle!if; tuo.oo .. '· DES CR If Tl ON SAFETY SUPPLIES TEUHETUINC TRUCK P~RTS ANNUAL BIG CANYON PAYMENT JANITORIAL SUPPLIES INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAKPLING ICE TRASH DISPOSAL VASTEHAUllHG CO"PUTEI PROGRAHHING CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING PUHP PAllTS CONTR~L ... EQU I PHENT SOLVENTS SCUH IOI llDS IEPAll ~DHl81,TIATIV~.CHARGE. aEfUND EMPLOYEE MILEAGE TOOLS JAFETY ~~~SSE~ .. TOOLS, SHALL HAADVAlE PUILICATIOH PIPE $urruu PERMIT FEES TYPEVAITIR HAIHTENANCE POWER NATURAL GAS DIESEL FUEL IOJTUD VAJU STHL SIOCk PETTY CASH IEIHBURSEHEHT ElECTRICAl.$UPPllES LAI SUPPi.i ES LOCKS VAST~HAUl,NG MONITOR.NG EQUIPHENT EHllHE PARTS AIR FARE. All FARE HUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL REPAIRS CASOLINl oii.i VERY SiiV i CE COHPAESSOA PARTS. VALVES . LAI SUPPll ES STEEL STOCK PUHP REPAIRS PUHP PARIS LIAllLITY CLAIHS ADHIMISTRATOAS ( .. :::: tx:t I ~ :::: fUNO NO ~19~ • JJ OISJ VORKING CAPllAL PROC£SSING DAfC 1/!q/e• fAGC PEFORt NUM,ER AP•S COUNTY SANllAIJON DISIRICts·of ORANG[ COUNIY CLAIHS FARO 9112518• .. UAPR A~I NO. 07•111]9 GltJ2CO nn2u OJ(,2CJ2 nr~u 01"20_ 01"205 UUflt. 0102"1 SUHHARY YCNOOR MAUKESMA EN&IN[ SFRVIC[NlER UESllRN TlCHNOLOGY ASSOCIAT£S UESJCPN VIRE & lllOYS UESJINGHOUSE tLEClRiC CORF UIJCG SCIEHTIFIC P.USS[ll UOLD tHO"AS l• UOOO,Uff t INC. JIEROX CORF. ZIP J["PORARY PCRSONNCl JOlAl CLAIMS PAID Ol/251&• AHOUNt un,.26 $265.0D U68.96 i68Je l'I na.u SU.98 ·u1.Jj2.ea SI tl92e69 S328o8~ 1516tU7e lO ================= AHOUHT qr:ur~seg ----------------$ s.~1::::1 IZ FIR FUND 9,516.51 IJ OPER FUND . Z,9,8.7J #J ACO FUND 52.,I ll FIR FUND 6.76 IS OPER FUND 11,JJi.90 15 ACO FUND ' IJ.67 is FIR FUND zo,oas.,s ,, OPER FUND I • 116.)6 11 OPER FUHO ' . ,,o•i.12 17 F/R FUND l2 .,I 'I 'I" OPU tDHp 1:1· :11 .. 516 OPER FUND • 92. 1Sg6 ACO FUND 2J.IS llJ ACO FUND 1,761.1, JT. OPER FUHO )2.,002.02 CORf IOJ,,00.2J SELF FUNDED LIAllllTY INSURANCE FUND ' l,JSJ.28 sEtF iuNoEo voRKEasi to"'· ••suRANcE ruNo is,,a,.t2· JT WORKING CAPllAl FUND ,9,071:90 TOTAL CLAIHS PAID 07/25/8, $576,07 .. 70 c· ... ( OCSCR 1rv ION iitiiNE PARTS HANWAY COVERS · VELDING SUPPLIES . ELECTRICAL suP;liES LAI SUPPLIES EHPLOYH HlllACE LEGAL SiivicES XEAOX REPRODUCTION !fHPO~ARY HELP ., ~ .( ( 6 1. FUND NC ·'· ll/.RRANT NO. 07C227 OH22A ~ • I n7l,,229 ll7il23li C-7C231 ('170232 'l7C233 r'7C23lf 117(1235 C7C236 070237 r· 1'123U ~H239 IJ1021f0 uH2lf1 t1~21f2 :::: C7~2lf3 ("""") (,1 i.~41t I t17(121f5 ........ 'i1 O~lt6 ~ r70247 (;1\:~46 C•70249 tl7'l250 (\ 70251 onn.2 C71i2S3 t7r~~lf nr.ns l171)2S~ '170257 (17fi258 (17r.2~9 ii7!l2t:O Z7t'261 \ t\7~262 (J7t:263 u7~2M ;~ 71..;>65 01r,~·ti& t'.7~267 07U268 t7J269 tHno n 7 ;.~71 0711272 l ~ ( .. 9199 -JT DIST MCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/03/84 FACE ... _ -· _ .. B lP OR J NUMBER .. AP4 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG£ COUNTY VE NOOR ~DAMSON J~CUSTRJESt INC. ADVANCO CCNSTRUCTORSt INC• AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS ANAHE~H BUSINESS HACHINES THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. AQUA BEN CCRf'. ~RROW-RISCOt INC. CLAIMS PAID 08/38/84 AMOUNT OESCR IPTION .U t 7,6 .51 _____ ·--__ ELECIIHCAL SUPPLIES $370t2~0.0~ CONTRACTOR PW-097, P2-25-2 $39~.so LAB SUPPLIES --------·----~?~~.-~p ______ ----·-·-OffeCE_MAtHINU_ ··- S50le3~ COMPRESSOR PARTS S22t943e81 CHEHICAL COAGULANTS . u~o.p~ .. --.... . . .ELECJRICAL SUP.PLIES · Slt065.89 SHALL HARDWARE ( fAKER PLV~COO co., INC. DON c. BEATTIE L.W. BEHi~ TR~CTOR & IMPLEMENT BIG co~ RENTAL co. s1ao.oo MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SAFETY EVALUATIONS eROOKS INSTRUMf NTS CPT CALIFORNIAt INC. joHN CAROLLO ENGINC£Rs JOHN CASON CHE~WEST lhCUSTRIESt INC. CHESTERTO~ LOS ANGELES CHEVRON u.s.A •• INC. WILLIAM N. CLARKf COMPUTER MAYE CONNELL C~fVROLET CO~SOLICAlEO ELECTRICAL DISl• CO~TINEhTAl CHEMICAL CO CONTPOLCO COOPER ENERGY SERVICES COST~ Hf.SA AUTO P~RTSt INC. Cil CONSOLIDATED WATEP ~ARRY ~U~TJ_ TRUCK & £QUIFHENT PETER C. tAVIO CO. DECKER INSTRUH[Nl SUPPLY CO. DECO DE GUELLE 8 SONS GLASS CO. DEPT. OF FISH & GAME OEW-rAR SALES & srRVICE OIGIDYNE COMPUTER S£RVIC£S DISCO PRINT CO"FANY DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. DUMAS DIESEL JNjECTION OU~N EOWAPDS CORP. DYNEfR CORPPOATION f.AsT"1ANt INC. ENCHANTEftt INC. FACTORY REPRESENT~TIVEt INC. FALCON OISrOSAL SERVICE FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. FILTER PUf'P rnr. ___ ..... ~nli.~ 2 ~ -... SAfETY . SUP.PU E.S S950.00 TRASH DISPOSAL s1,s21.3q CONTROL EQUIPMENT . .... $267•?9 .... OFFICE SUPPLIES S2t987.07 ENGR. P2-25-2, ENERGY TASK FORCE . S68~.30 ENGINE OIL CONTAINERS -------~2tl.?O·~HL___ _ __ .... F.ERRIC .CHLORIDE. TANK RENTAL S740.30 ENGINE OIL S4,874.05 GASOLINE, ENGINE OIL . _ ~~7 • !l 0 .. . _ TRAVEL EXPENSES, WPCF CONFERENCE $'45.00 APPLE COMPUTER REPAIRS S397.78 TRUCK PARTS $2t263e66 .. ·---. ELECTRICAk SUPPLIES. St,998.10 CHLORINE $708.87 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ... _. U8t29c}.2't. .. .. #10 ... 0UTFALL ENGINE REPAIRS S254.t3 TRUCK PARTS s1~2.1s WATER SOFTENER RENTAL . --· --.. s1a2.0Q ---. --. CRANE .l.\~NTAL S3t741.60 RETENTION PW-102 $722.62 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Slt35_7.1~. . ...... ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1226.72 GLASS t225.0Q ENGR. PERMIT FEE ____ .HQfl.•lL ___ ,, ---·-· HANHOLLCOVEf\ LIFTERS S17~.~0 COMPUTER PARTS !395.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES $2,3lf9e52 "8'.' .BASIN .REPAIRS Sle870.15 ENGINE REPAIRS S2t088.41 PAINT SUPPLIES ... _S51?!131 __ TRUCK PARTS .. Slt876.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES S3t503e00 OCEAN MONITORING S~50.~G SAFETY SEHINAR .S24t426.2~. SLUDGE HAULING AND DISPOSAL S66.90 FREIGHT 1161.67 ENGINE PARTS -,, • ::: Cl I N :: FUND NC WtiP.RA~T tlO. rt70;:>7.3 01~,2 74 C7CJ275 •)7Q276 ,, 7 t. ~ 77 ~·H27A ('170279 riH2fo •i7V2P1 t:7 .12A2 H :.26~ f}7C2M fl 7C 2t\5 C.7U2P6 f17~·287 U7~;2P.13 li70289 07r291) r.7r.291 OU2'12 Ct 1 •'? c; :! C7llC'qlf (\71255 07(:296 r:1l.291 ::H29A (; 1C 21?9 C·70!0f'I J7~301 J711~02 (;7 :' ! li3 .) Hi! (.4 (!7•J3il!' (: 7 ti 3 06 Hli307 .)7 '~ ~ (•IJ n.•3r.9 inr.n<1 ~7V3J 1 r7f.312 r'iH1313 ~7(.314 1'17C3l5 07~316 ~7£.317 1)7.:.~lA ( 9199 -JT OIST WCRKING CAFITAL PPOCESSING DATE 8/~~/84 FA~E Rf PORT NUMOER ~P43 VENDOR FISCHE~ & PCRTFR CO. FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. FLAT & VERTICAL CONtR£TE FLO-SY ST HS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/09/84 AH OU NT DESCRIPTION PIPE SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES CORE DR I Lll NG PUMP PARTS .. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ... ~ FLUIO HANCLING SYSTEMS, INC. FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA FRANCE CO~PRESSOR PRODUCT FREOSON $213.46 Sl68.9lf S3:>8e75 $463.22 $6He38 t.545.llt Sl1l55.'t'l $84.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES, FILH PROCESSING COMPRESSOR PARTS FPEEWAY TffUCK PtiPTS FRUIT GRO~£RS LABORATOPY, INC. CITY OF FULLERTO~ GM HAINTENANCEt INC. GANAHL lUH~fR CO. JULIE GAU.ER GENERAL P.I~CING CORF. GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. JEAN GRIGG . GEORG£ Te HALL CO. HARAINGTO~ INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS HOUSE OF eATTERIES R.S. HUG~ES CO., INC. CITY Of HLNTINGTON BEACH HUNTJNGTO~ BEACH RUP8ER STA~P HU~TINGTO~ SUPPLY HYCROTE>C IM.fERIAL '-iEST CHEMICAL co. INDUSTRIAL THRf AOEO PRODUCTS INGRAH PAF£P. INSTRUMENTATION LA~ORATORY,JNC THl JRYI~£ CO. B.~. JOHN H~ULING K.r.c. CCf'f'ANY KAS SAFETY PROOUCTS KELLY BLUE BOOK KELLY PIPE CO. KING BEARING, INC. KIRST PU~P & HACHINl WORKS L ~ N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO L.fl.\.:eS•t INC. LA MOTTE Ch(MICAl PRODUCTS LAURSEN CClO~ LAO LA~LESS DETROIT DIESEL LEE & PO CONSULTING ENGR. LIGHTING CISTRIOUTORSt INC. THE CHARLES LOW[ CO. LYO~S l~T•l SECU~ITYt INC. .. S39:J.91 uo.ou s13.q4 $54.00 Sl t063e42 S17. 02 $196.52 $4"5.81. -· $50.6'f S346e60 S47.1E: s11. 02 S21f2.59 n.1!). U5.79 S46.30 S2t938.32 _ S5t713.07 Sl94.25 u,176.60 $715.00 S28l.4J Sl t971.60 iCJ J, 266. lit i38.11 S62•Qe H'l3.0l s.959. 9a S12.45 stt,e91.13 u16.eq S109.03 stc.46 Sl,194.30 Sl~ 1039000 S566e3.7 S3J6.80 S666.00 ( TOOLS TRUCK PARTS LAB ANALYSIS WATER USEAGE PUMP PARTS ·.LUMBER .. EMPLOYEE HILEAGE OFF ICE SUPPLIES TELEPHONE EMPLOYEE MILEAGE VALVES PI PE SUPPLIES BATTERIES SAFETY SUPPL I ES WATER USEAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES SHALL HARDWARE .LUBRICANTS FERRIC CHLORIDE SHALL HARDWARE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES LAB MAINTENANCE USE CHARGE OVERPAVHENT WOOD.SHAVINGS CONTRACTOR 3-2~-1 SAFETY SUPPLIES .SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL PIPE SUPPLIES BEAR I NG SUP Pll ES PUMP PARTS UNIFORM RENTAL WELD I NG SUPPLIES LAB CHEMICALS FILH PROCESSING TRUCK PARTS ENGR. P2-5R-2 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL • •. ( 11 ., l : i . :: ("""") I \.N :: ( ( .. ( FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST V~RKING CAPITAL PPOCESSING OATE 8/r.3/84 rAGE 3 MARRAtlT NO. 070319 c11r.3cll 07"321 r.7032:? C711323 t7 a:s2'* 070325 ~7()326 u7C327 01032e G70~29 07( 330 C70331 070332 1l7 ~ .333 0Ht334 (17'1~35 07r.336 07fo337 :.i1£13~1! C7i.339 Cl7G34C 37'J3/.tl 07'>~42 \:7'J3lt3 £;7 '•34lt 111 u345 {, 7C' 3% CJr.347 ::,n,34e (7')349 u7u~~o llH35J £l7 0352 r.. 7 ~ ~53 fl7C35'f .ar,355 i'7L·3~b nrJ357 C7035fi 07(1359 117(1~60 4}7n3H cm~£.~ Cl:"!.363 ~7 ( 3E't -· R£PORT NUMBER AP't3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG[ COUNTY VENDOR HARVAC EL~CTRONICS HCKESSO~ CHEMICAL CC. MCMASTER-CARR SUPrLY CO. MEMORY HASTfRSt INC. ~ESA CONSOLIDATED WATER ~ICRCWAYE REfAIR SPECIALIST MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. MONITEKt INC. MONTGOMERY LABORATORl£S GEORGE & B. HO~G~N CO•• INC. ~ATld~AL. s•NltARY SUPPLY NUHATIC E~GINEERING OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE-CASHIER OLYMPIC C~EHICAL CO. ORA~~E COC~TY [GUIPMENT CO. ORANGE VALVF. & FITTING CC. COUNTY OF ORANGE CO. CF ORANGC-AUDITOR CONTROLR COUNlY SANITATION DISTRICT PPG JNDUST~IESt INC. PACIFIC DELIVERY SYSlEff fAClflC BELL PALL WESTERN CORP. PARAMOUNT METAL & SUPPLY INC. PASCAL £ LUOWJG PEROXIOATIC~ SYSTEMS, INC. PIC~WICK FAFER PRODUCTS POLY ENTERPRJS[S, INC. PORTER POILER SERVJCEt INC. HAROLD PRifROSE ICE HlkE PRLICH & SONS FROC(S~ EGUIPHENT COMPANY PULSAFECOER RAFFERTY INTERN~TiONAL TRUCKS REPU~LIC ~~TIONAL Llff TH[ REPLf.LIC SUfPLY CO. Of REX~ORC ELCCTRO~IC PRODUCTS REYNOLD ALUMINUM SUPPLY CO. ROACHWATER TECHNOLO~Yt INC. POEDiNS & MEYE~S JOSfFH T. RYEPSON & SON, INC. SANCON INC. SANO DOLLAR BUSJNFSS FORMS SANTA 1-NA DOOGE S4~TA ANA flECTPIC MOTORS CLAIHS PAID 08/08/84 AMOUNT SU6e2't Sllt882.3G $100.97 $2.,5./t6 S6e00 S55e'l3 $162.18 S22't.2't S2t'tlO.OO ._Ht185·H $182.37 S323e90 . S7tH8;6~ ssJo.no Sl8t677.21 ~ -· . . . . _. . DESCRIPTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CHLORINE SHALL HARDWARE COMPUTE IL.PACKS WATER USEAGE MICROWAVE REPAIRS SAFETY .SUPPL I ES. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LAB ANALYSIS RETENTION. P.W~106 . JANITORIAL SUPPLIES COHPRESSOR PARTS CAUSTIC SODA CHARTER VESSEL-OCEAN MONITORING CHLORINE .. nJ. a.a ·-..... . ·-···· HOSE .... --....... . $313.95 S2t285.31 ~71t5'tO.QU SH t905.CJO S1 ~8.59 ...... S'55.2~ Slf33.76 s110.01t S25t63't • 70 S121ft 1.75· 52 S29,891f.UO .. S580~6.7. Slt'll0.86 s21.s2 _$6i).00 \76tl25.60 $'t!>7.39 ~lf01.6l. S379e'tA S7t2'lO.UO S'tft2e75 Slf98.56 S2t2'l6e2~ . . $'1't ~ l 7 $385· 97 $3t31'h71 $239,890.50 S60elf2. U23.83 $525·52 PI PE SUPPLIES DENS ITV TESTING . COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES REIHBURSE WORKERS' COHP. FUND PAINT SUPPLIES _ USER CHARGE TAPES TELEMETER I NG VALVES CONJR.ACTO~ PW-115 CONTRACTOR PW-123. P2-26 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ·-· __ -·· . JAN IT.OU A.L. SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES BUILDING MATERIALS INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE CONTRACTOR 3-28R PUHP PARTS PUHP. PARTS TRUCK PARTS SELF FUNDED STOP LOSS INSURANCE PREHIUH PIPE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES STEEL STOCK ENGINE PARTS PUHP PARTS SHALL HARDWARE . CONTRACTOR. l-2R-2&3 .. OFF I CE FORHS TRUCK PARTS ELECTRlC HOTOR REPAIRS t' .\ ·! I ~ Cl I ...i::-:::: I fUNO NO "ARF AU NO. 07~365 07r.366 070!67 C7v368 (i 7 t, 369 01r:no HC371 HOH2 tHn3 q ~· ~ 7'f fl7r375 07Cn6 r;1r.1 311 1i7!~378 ,17.:,379 ~7G~8'1 ·1J(J381 G7DP.2 i) 7tl 38.3 •17:'384 ')7(:385 (17J3B6 CH387 n H 3ea H[•3S9 !17(. ! Cj(I nr.391 '17(.~92 u7il~93 (17 {.354 "7~.39~ (170!96 cn397 070:!5P. (!7".:399 9199 -JT OIST WOPKJNG CAPITAL PROCESSING OAT( 8/0,/04 PAGr ~ REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENO OP SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. SHAMROCK SUPPLY SIGMA CHE~ICAL CO SIMS INDUSTRIAL SUFPLY SMITH BRCS. co. SO. CALIF. COASTAL WATER SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO• SO. CALIF. MATER to. SOUTHERN COUNTIES Oil CO. SPEECE SPEEDOY.f TEP SfRAYING SYSTEMS CO. STAROW STfEl STfEL £XChA~Gf.• INC. TH£ SUPPLIERS J. WAY~E SYLVESTE~ TAYLOR-DUNN TICOR TITLE INSURANCE TRANS-AMERICA DELAVAL1 JNr.. H. o. TRERICE TRUCK & A~TO SUPPLY, JNC. CITY OF TliSTJN u.s.o. CORP. FRANK ULTIHO UNITED P~RCEL Sf.RVICE V"R. SCH.NT IF IC VAL~£Y CITIES SUPPLY CO. WALL STREET JOURNAL JOHN R • lilAPLE S CARL VARP.EN & CO. MESTINGHOlSC ElfCTRIC CORP B. D. WHETSTON£ & ASSOCIATES WHITE• Fl~[ & VERVILLf Y .. Tl RE GEORGE YARDLEY ~SSOCIATCS ZIP tEHPO~·R~ PEASONNFL CLAIMS PAID ~8/0A/8~ .. AHOUNT '1 l !'23 Sltlf6'teCJ2 S261Je05 $596 elf U $181. 2G si.211.00 $;>S:Jt555.ll9 S8e52 S17.567.64 $32.50 ss~.84 $31'\.0f !9.)9.S5 $21632. 71 S&tt3.23 _ SJ,908. PO. S375.JO S1. :)99. 75 S268e22 si,740.a~ $336.61 ~5~3~~, $6~979.50 S36elf 1 S31183etl5 s2,21t9.20 $101.00 S405e00 S62e70 S.319.68 S.t.1'12.80 s3,902.11 $385.'t2 $198·18 S619e58 TOTAL CLAiHS PAIO 08/G8/84 Sl,5691365.92. ================= TOOLS TOOLS OESCIHPTION LAB CHEMICALS WELDING.SUPPL,ES ENGINE PARTS DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY PO\IER .. WATER USEAGE DIESEL FUEL . JRU(:K P~RTS .. PI PE SUPPLIES STEEL STOCK STEEL STOCK SHALL HARDWARE, TOOLS PETTY CASH REIHBURSEHENT ELECTRIC CART PARTS j-e·t1fi.:t·r:Et. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTROL EQUIPMENT .TRUCK PARTS WATER USEAGE WELDING REPAIRS -CONTRACTOR i>\ri-ii 2 DELIVERY SERVICE LAB SUPPLIES. PIP£ SUPPLiES, VALVES SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL ODOR CONSULTANT ilA~ILlii tL~~"~ A~~INljTRATOR ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CSDOC #5 ~ARCEL BILL,NG DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE OISPO~AL STUDY TRUCK TIRES VALVES TEMPORARY HELP (' .... ( •1 •. ( • ~ Cl I U1 :: ( . - 9199 JT DIST WORKING .CAelTAL..FUND .. --·-·---···-··· SUHHARY 12 OPER FUND 13 OPER FUND #3 ACO FUND 13 F/R FUND #5 OPER FUND #6 OPER FUND #7 OPER FUND 17 FIR FUND #11 OPER FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #6&7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED HEALTH .INSURANCE FUND SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIHS INSURANCE FUND SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COHP. INSURANCE FUND .. JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIHS PAID 08/08/84 ( .. PROCESSING DATE 08/03/84 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATiON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . --CLAlHS .PAID 08/08/84 .... AHOUNT •· .. · ... $ ... an. 12 165.22 76, 125. 60 91,61'7.21' 2,080.St, 35.35 .2,746.59 600.00 71.90 . 27. 81 . 6,628.50 518,411.49 807,059.04 7,200.00 62.70 14,905.90 lt0,764.02 $1,)6~J,365·~92. ( PAGE 5 I I· f! !· ... ,, 4 I "' ':!.I Ii,,,. •I}: - '.I ! •j I I '·:1 . I L H. ;·' ( , .. ; __ , ¥ d ]: I,.' I! I''·~ '"i 11 I .~. .. j' i I ! I ., 1} I :: t::1 i1I ~ 1.:::: I I !.' 11: \'' Li ~ u l·i H I..: 1,.; d ~ I H l.1 < I·' ·I ! ... • ( ~ .. -! I; i.j· ~tr 1 I FUND NO WARRANT l'JO. 07t)q}!) 07i>4H . . 07•J417 rt}(J 't l i:I r.1::1tic~ a70lf2ll CH42l ll70422 (17042~ nC42'i 070'125 Hv42~ fl7Ci427 071H2f' 071)1f2C CH't3~ Cl7H!l GH4~2 <:n'+33 07H3lf 07!1435 l\70436 G701t37 (17t: 't 38 970't~q CHlflfll 670lflfl 070442 (. 7i!443 l'70lf't4 0 7(, lf/f 5 CJ\}lflff: (J7(.lf47 t7044h 071jlf49 f.17v45C' 07C451 '17'145;> r.71i45,!. 07(i45'1 ll70455 07£.4% 1)7(..457 uHlf58 ~H459 . ~7G46'l ( 91C:-9 -t.IT ·OIST WORKING NPI·TA·V·-· .. -·------......... . --·---· ··-·----·. --'PROCESSll'IH; OAT£ fl/17/84 OAGF R(FORT NU~0£R AP43 COUNTY SA~lTATION OIST~ICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . ·----............ -···-· -..... · --···---·-· ··-· ·-·· · ---·-··---cu-J-tts-·-flA·JO--oe-122-1e tr··--·· ------..... · ·· -· ·----· .. . VE NDClR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION A-1 INSTITUTIONAL f 'UIF• co. S234.92 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ~.~.A. ~Ff~ CO. S?9.18 SHALL HARDWARE AC lJ CiN-·-J NS-H'UMf:NH··-· J NC-.-·------·--··-:·----· -·-·-·---·iL t e;.-30----· ·-··-·-·-·· ELECTR'I CAL SUPPL I ES AtR CALIFORNIA stee.oo AIR FARE AIR CNE~ SYSTCMSt JNC. S561eSO FIBER GLASS HR FR OliUC lS ··&· CHtH I-EH:!' ti NC .. -.... ·--···-·· "·--·-···· ·-····· .. -·--···s 129• :s2· -·-· . -·-'SPEC I AL rv· GASES All-~T~TE VlHICLE!. INC. f2e•82.t0 VEHICLE LEASING tMfRJCAN COMPRESSor PART5 Sl,54 •• 15 COMPRESSOR PARTS -· ·-··AMER JGAN·-SCIEN-f'·J-F H: · P~ODUC-T-S---·------"'1·tt~i"lf2·-----·lAB' .. SUPPLIES ........ -..... - ~HERICAN SOCIETY FOP MICROBIOLOGY . s1e.no LAB SUBSCRIPTION /IMCRICA~ TECHNICAL SUFFLY · S347.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES ANAHE··lfl et:SJNESS·-~Httlttl~·f-· .. _. __ .......... ----.. --------··-----t3!)9•6C· ........... OFFICE. SUPPLIES lHE tNC~OP PACKI~F CO. $812.78 PIPE SUPPLIES JE~N AHOlPSON $17.'13 EHPLOYEE MILEAGE /I NG H. IC-A ·f\ EN l Al -S £-ft VI Cf-5 · · -·· ·---·--·---··-----------St 2'594J'Q-----·. --· TOWH RE NT Al ~bUA Bf.N CO~P. S28t665.65 CHEHICAL COAGULANTS A~EN~ INDLSTRIES IHC. Sltl?4.DO ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ·ARPOV-~lSC·O· "")Nfi --.. ··--· . ··-----·-···--.. -----.. ·---nn•83 '. ·-· .... ELECTRlCAL SUPPLIES ~ssoc. or eos OF cr.~TIFICATION $79.GO TECHNICAL MANUAL ~SSOCJATIC~ OF METP.OPOl.ITA~ SEWERAGE AGENCIES SJ35.UO CONFERENCE REGISTRATION ,..4LPH·-Wa-· ATKJNSMJ · -·----· -·--····-·--... _ --·--··--------··--··-st55·•·2''l-·--.. --.. "ENGINE ... PARTS UC INOUSTRJAL SUFPLY• JNC. !•77.71f SHALL HARDWARE BA~lR (GUlFHENT RlNTAL~ $276.00 EQUIPHENT RENTAL i-!.\NK·OF· AMERJC~ NT· &-SA ··-· .. ·-···--. ···--·· ·"-------··---ssen·.21t-...... -TRAVEL EXPENSES £3°fCKMAN USTRUM£NTS $12.571.7& TOXICITY ANALYZER AEVCO . S95.21f ELECTRIC CART PARTS i I' I 1·: 1:1 I I I I:: ... l. I I '' , .. ; 1.: : i [) J EUY ·& /ISSOCHTE'-fi·• INf-.· ·· ··-__ ,, __ -------.. ---------i5-~-t>-.-OC· --------·WORKERS' COMP. ADH IN I STRATORS, SEH I NAR REG I ST RAT I ON · ~oa•s Al~ CONOJTIONJNG $236.58 TRUCK REPAIRS I: '.· eOYll ENGINEERING CO~f S86t729.99 ENGR. 7-8, 7-7 1 • ffH:NfllER-FIELOER· 8 ASSOC., INC. -· ·· ·· -· ------·SP.22•14· ---·VALVES BPISTOL PARK MEDICAL GRr •• JNC tllf3.~0 PRE EHPLOVHENT EXAMS ~UILOl~G ~c~s. INC. $16.90 BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION BUS f f<:E SS· . .,ONI TOR · · ____ ... -· ··-···-·-----··--------· ---·----i.~thOO--· ------... SUBS CR I PTI ON PUTIER fNFINEERJNG, INC. S30,5l2.lf5 ENGR. P2-23-6, CONSTRUCTION HANASEHENT r-COR fl[CTRONICS. IMC. $1~7.9~ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES JOHN CAfHlLLO ENf-JNH:'P.~-.... ·· ·· .... -.. -···163,llf&•~O-----.. -· ENGR.-·P2;.;26, p1:..21, P2-28;.;1, ENERGY TASK FORCE CHARL(S w. CARTER CO. SltA~~.5~ PIPE SUPPLIES JCHM c~~o~ $l46.2e ENGINE Oil SUPPLIES CHf.VRON o.s.·A .. lttc.-.... --·. ···-··· ..... -·-· -------·----s-11·1·7l·ht)fr--·-..... 'GASOLINE'; ENGINE OIL CHICO ~AHC FISH F~Ar~ llq~.50 LAB SPECIMENS COAST INSURANCE Af£~CY $~0t8~J.OO EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE PREHIUH r;orrnocK ·CC~PANY· ... --.. .._ ······-·-..... _, ----i2•H.-53·····-.... BUILDING MATERIALS C~NSOLICATEG ElfCTFICAL OI~T. SJo534~85 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES co~.SOL 10/i T rn R EPf? 0[ll!CT I Of.;S $7'l8. 36 BLUE PR I NT RE PRODUCT I ON CON Tl~ENl Al CHEMIC Al ·CO ·-· · · --· -· · .. -. . .... ____ S8 i45 3 .. 50 ·· ·-· ··· .... --·CHLORINE .. coo~rR [N[RGY Sf~VIC(S sqq2.s1 ENGINE PARTS " ~ ( .•. u •. ( I . I l I! ! l • j ! ,i I .1:1 ! '. I: i I I 1 i j I 1 ··i I: I 4 I·! \. ,, ·:I 11''.i I • :111·1 .. I• ( FUND ~O W/lfllU~T rm. C!7LIJE.J 070462 .(.7tlf63 Cl1 u4E4 H6465 C7Q46b 070467 (17046B 07Cs469 07ti't7!) 07'1471 0711472 (.7('473 071)47't l7u475 C7G"7~ nc 01 07tH7f1 t7t'479 nottei.1 OH'+Al CiH462 OH48?. (.71j4fi4 07( 485 071J4~~ 07C.487 r.7U48fl 07 o)lf 89 C:7C•49~• C7f:491 !17::14~2 (7(\493 07t'49lf v7:.tt95 07fJ49b (•1(,1tc;1 u7('145f.l . t7Clfqci G70501) {)7t5Cil n1o~r.2 U7'.15Cl3 C7r.504 07r505 ll7l'5lib CJJC:;q -JT OIST-WCRIHNG tAPl·lAl-·-· ( .. ···---·----,..._ ..... -----_ .... _ ·-· -----. ·-· ·-· ....... ··-- -··· -· --f~OHSSING DATE R/17184 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ---· ..... ---·· -·-·. ·---CL-A HtS--PA-J0-08/i2lA't·--·-··-. --·--·-·-... VENDOR AMOUNT orsCRIPTION COSTA HES/I AUTO PAPTS• INC. $313.26 TRUCK PARTS ( ? CAL CONSOLIDATED ~/llf.R $294.45 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL, RESIN TANK EXCHANGE ... ~f,\ Tl:--OF-C·Al IFO~N 11,---·-······· ·-·-· ---·---·· -·---· -·--· -·--·su;o.-oo -------ANNEXAH ON '' 07 PROCESS I NG FEE. ST~TE Cf CALIFOPNJA . 'lE0.00 ANNEXATION #50 PROCESSING ~TATL Of CALIFORNIA \160.0C ANNEXATION #~4 PROCESSING FEE 011(, .. Uc. ·-··· -··----··· ·· -----··-· ·----· · -----------···-··-$h5l2-.21-----····-·--·ENGINE PARTS DAILY flLOT Sl3~.3~ LEGAL ADVERTISING, SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL O•V/ILS SALES COMPANY S176.29 PIPE SUPPLIES LAYTON-fOUhGRY -····-----·-··--·---·--·-··-----· ----------S-hlOhtl-7-------------CHAIN·--· ClCKE~ INSTRU~(NT ~UFPLY CO. Slt545.4R GAUGE DECO S966.08 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ·Oltl<SONE--· ---···-··-·· -· ·· ·· · · ·----··-------··--··-·--··-··----·S37136·--··· --CONTROL ·EQUIPHENT OIGIOYN[ COHPUT[R SlRVICCS !11026.~8 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE OUNN ro~AROS COPP. Slt448.3C PAINT SUPPLIES DWYER -lNstRUMEtwT·.-·· INC, ----· · --· -·---·--------·-----··-· ---U"3;hH--------------El·ECTR I CAL SUPPL I ES OYNATkO~ ELECTRIC co •• INC. $130.58 CONTROL EQUIPMENT OYNEE~ CORFROATJON S!B.05 . PAINT SUPPLIES f~ASTHAN.---lNC.·-·-· -·----·---· ·---····---···------····S1>t-526.-51 -· -·---· OFF·ICE SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT ER[~HA~D EQUIPMENT S360.62 TRUCK PARTS ELECTRO~JC EALANCINC CO. S85.0D SCROLL BALANCING ENYIP.OSFHE-P.E··C0¥ ··-·-· ---·---· ··· ·--·· ·-·-·--·-·-·-···----t·lt61-lil'O--··--·-·-··-·ENGR. #5£6 MASTER PLAN UPDATE HlCHAll J. FILECCJA Sll.27 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE FILTrR SUFPLY co. Sl~262.b6 ENGINE PARTS ·qS<;HEP. -&-0 0RTER CC.-···-··-· ··--··-· ·--··----·--·--S;3tti53·.d?O----····--·PIPE SUPPLIES fLOijER STREET AFT~ $114.76 USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT FOOT~JLL €~h0EN EUUl~HENT $45.36 SHALL HARDWARE C ITV ···OF -f UU.ERTON-· ---· -·····--····--·-·----------·---------·-·SU-7.99 -------·· -·WATER USEAGE fi4NAHL LUMBER CO. SJ69.l4 SHALL HARDWARE JULIE GARNEF se2.6~ EHPLOYEE MILEAGE G,\RRAlT-Ol:LAHAN COMFAN1-· -· ·····-·· -------····-·-·S2t245•10 ·--····-· -·l:AB· CHEMICALS GEH-0 1 -LITE PL/ISTirs COR~. s110.19" GLASS tENFRAL TELEPHONf CG. s~.53?.53 TELEPHONE ·-· H'°'t.R/,l-· "HOLE SALE -PROOUC·lS·---·····--·--·-----__ _:_·-----$%6.·16-···---·-STORAGE· BI NS €1LLESFI£ R£PORTJHG SERVICES $177.50 OCEAN WAIVER TRANSCRIPT JfiN G~IGG S72.37 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE 1£0-·A·.~ HAl'folcll . .... . .. ·-------· ... ·----·· ·---------··--· -.,3ee.f)O··-·-· -··· .. VACUUM TRUCK-ING. HA~~JUGTO~ INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS t931.87 PIPE SUPPLIES HASTY AlfflMENT 122.lO TRUCK REPAIRS -·MI CHAll:--U.f:-1 N2··-·-· ·--· ·---····---··· ·-· · · -· ----.---------··-. --$i~··SS-----··----EMPLOYEE-· MI HAGE ·· ·· · · · --· w.c. HENCRJr & co., INC. S2tU9~.63 ELECTRIC MOTOR t-ltliSEY PRCtUCTS, INC• $1'1 U.91 · TRUCK PARTS HGNf:YWfll • I NC·• · -· ·-· --·· -:. ·---· -~26 le 24·· · ·· STRIP CHARTS ~G~A~O SU~FLY CO. $126.28 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES R.S. HUGH[S co., JNC. $649.51 SHALL HARDWARE HUNOU-Y -CCMP~Nv,. Jr.Jc.-.... ·· ----·--· --· ----f.3,UAei9-·-··· · ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CllY OF Hl.NTJNGTON llf"AC.li iCJ.80 WATER USEAGE i; 1:: 1 :1 'I f'I 1.i j.:1 I": e (: i '! I' i I'.~ ;.j !·j 1 ·; ,. I I i:: ,. •': I··. .. ! • ~ l i i ,· '• · .. : : I I :·: j,• I: f.1 ; j l.i l .. _I ·1 I°; 1·1 I .; I a ,~ I " I l-· . 1L. I 11 •i j 1 • FUNO NO 91q9 -JT ·(HST··WORKING E#\PJ-"FU ·-····-···--· ······ · ····-·····-··· .. ··· ········--·-----···--PROCESSING DATE A/17184 PAGE" --·-·····-·---·-·-·-· -·--···-·--···----·-······--·-·--.. ---·-·-···---------·--··-·----·-···--·--·--·-··· ... , ---· ~· -. '7 ,. ·1 REPORT NUHe ER AP!\ 3 :,. ___ . _ .. --·-·. __ ... . ... ______ ··---------·----··-·cou~-~~-~~~~~~-!-i~-~!~~~:~~~2-~~"~l\NGE cc~~.!.!.. -----.. _ --· .. . --· __ -·· ··-... ___ . ( 1J , .. l"i . ''I 1•1j 1 .. ,--·-· •• ! I. (\ ' i:;I . I·., ' .. '1 ';·: '·' l.,• [ .. , I ..... :tf3 r • 'v...a I ..., ........ 1 .. '. 1 I ... ~ • ! 1 .. i ~· I . ; ···i I ~ •• i :··1 1 •• , I.I ,( I.: '·' Lr I' 'l I.I 1.1 q 1., 1 ... 1 ,I I. \' ~. t: .. d t'.I VARRANT NO. 070507 0705013 · UC•5()9 iJ7 051 ·l l'H511 070!:12 071:513 070514 r,7(.~15 ;)7051h OH~17 07l'510 CrH51t? 07C521J 070521 00522 07'1523 07f 52'1 '17052~ C.7(152~ (:70527 07052(' 070529 97053~ (17(.~31 0 7~ 5~2 flf.535 07Cl531f 070535 o7u53E: C70537 07(\5314 Ci70539 01us.!40 ll1(1!>4l 07U542 Cl705'+!i ~7US44 t17051f5 07l'~4L n7~547 07(1548 07G54'3 0705~~ &705!:1 117 05~~! ( VENDOR AHOUNT OESCP IFTJON HUNTINGTON ~EACH RUR~EP ~TAHP S7.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES lSCO CO~F~~y S2,626.33 LAB SUPPLIES. PIPE SUPPLIES ._ .. _ .. ·1 MP e: RI" At-\ [·!1· -·cH Ut 1-c l\L--eo ·-·-··--··· .. --·-·---:----s-n ,n5·;-a6·-·---__ .. FE RR"IC. c HL 0 R I DE .............. . INDUSTRIAL HREAOEO P~ODUCTS S257.il5 SHALL HARDWARE .. INGPAH PAFER 1ltJ98.90 OFFICE SUPPltES IRVINE··INOUSTRIAL:·--L·Mmsc1trr· .. ·---·--··-.. --. ·-----n;&8,•75". ---· ... PLANT HAINTENANCE J~VINE RANCH MATER OJST~ICT Slf.OC WATER USEAGE IRVINE SWEEPING Sl~VJC[ S2/f9.0u PLANT MAINTENANCE Ji_"..SSF.E·-·APH UNCE--Sf-fWl ef-e·e-.-·--·--. ···--.. --------------1"1ftit'J'•·6·o-----····· ---LAB '"REPAIRS KAHAN B(ARINGS & SUPPLY Sl4.l0 BEARING SUPPLIES KAS SAFETY PRODUCTS s121.eo SAFETY SUPPLIES Kr.E~AN-PiPf-··&--SUPf·L:·Y-·co ... ---· --"--··--·-···-· ·--···-·---·--·n11··9e·-·---·-.. PIPE SUPPLIES KELLY PIPE co. s1.1u1.oo PIPE SUPPLIES KENN[OY/JENKS ENGINfERS s41,qJl.46 ENGR. PW-061R -.. ·I' JHG ··BfltfHNG·t·-·I f\;C-.-·-·····---·-·-----·--·--·-------s-~;~3"2·92~-------BEAR I NG· SUPPL I ES ~LEEN-LINE CORF $221.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ~NOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES s17q.~1 SHALL HARDWARE t<OPP(R·S --CO•' -lf\:C • -· ......... · · · .. · -· · -· _..... -----------.. ···---n·q·;·39 ----.. ·-· . FREIGHT l & N UNIFORM SUPFLY CO S3t814.00 UNIFORH RENTAL L.e.y.s., INC. !637.20 WELDING SUPPLIES; DEHURRAGE -b\ H~T-TE-CHEMIC~L -fR~OUCT-S-··-·······---------------------$5-fl-.·9-S---·· ---·LAB -CHEMICALS lAU~SEN er.LOR LAB s54.34 FILM PROCESSING H.v. LAMH~ASTE~ 8 co. J~c. !'+36.95 TESTING P2-24-1 lCWCO··ElF.E:rP.IC co.···-.. . ·-· ...... ______ --·--· ·-·--·-·-·---·S178•33··· .. ··-· . . ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LJ~HTIN~ tlSTRIBUTORS, l~C. $9~.68 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LO~ ANGELES CHEHJCAL CO. S~,~90.62 INSECTICIDES .. l OWRY··&-ASSOCIA TES ···· --···-·· ·· -·-.. ·------------------S•24"i"56--· -·---.. -.. ENGR; · 113 FORHATI ON LYON~ I~T·L SECU~ITYt INr. . Slt99a.qo PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL MACK TRUCKS, INC. Slt475.72 TRUCK PARTS t'i"RV/\C ELECT-RON-JCS·--·-... ·-· .. -· -· ·-.. ___________ .. ___ HO•J-a· ··---.. ----ELECTRICAL ·suPPLIES MHLACK, INC. U36.08 FREIGHT ~ATT • CHLO~, INC. 5lt3lg.69 PIPE SUPPLIES -~H·P·OHHfR eORP--·--·· ----------.... ----·--·-· ·---------$-5-·.-trlf't·.-3·8--·-----Fl:OW METER REPAI Rs--··-.···- ~C~ASTFR-CARR SUFFLY CO. S776.77 SHALL HARDWARE ~JNE S~FElY APFLIANC£S CO. S256.52 PUHP PARTS MONJH.K·1·HIC .... ·--·· ··--··· .. -· ·-·····-· ···-·····-··· .. ·--·---·--··Ull:J•·22-··--····· ELECTRIC MOTOR MOHTGOHERV ELEV~TOR COMPiNY $328.if8 PLANT #2 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE ~YCO lhOUSTPIES 1296.87 SHALL HARDWARE t.AT I ON Al -LUf'iBEP SUPFl:-Y ···· .... ·-·· ·· ... --· · --·-··· ---·----··f.·25 'l•·!lo·-·-·--··· .. ···· ·tUHBER; ·SMALL HARDWARE . CLYMFlC C~EKICAL co. $461179.~6 CHLORINE OR~N€E VAlV( & Fllll~G CO. i179.57 PIPE SUPPLIES OlilTE><· GO~f'---.... --······-·--··-·-·-i~:H•lflt ·· -PIPE SUPPLIES lOUNTY OF OPANGl J2.55U.o~ SURVEY E-24-1, ANNEXATION HAPS, COUNlY SA~llATION CJSlRJCTS OF ORA"GE COUNTY. S2t2~4.16 REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND PARCEL TAPES t-.1.n.A. ··-··-· ......... ··---· .. ···--. -···-· -· .... ··---··--···--·-· -·U65a·o·o··-·-....... ·-PERSONNEL SEMINAR" REGISTRATION PPG lhtUSTRIESt I~C. $206.36 PAINT SUPPLIES ,, -. ( ~--... .. C 1:1 , .. .! I; ,· i::i l··l "I 1, ... r j i< l'j l"·I 1::1 '· H ',) I \ I" I i. .! } j: I· I I; .. I·; I I 1 ... 1 I I / H '-j l.1 ': ; ·I .· ti , I, !.' , !.(' I l'lj , I , , 1: I ,,, i ~! : ~. p .. I j.;; :. ; I ,.. ' '·· 'j .. ·: 'I' :., l .. : ! ,, i 't .... ( :.~ ,__ -I,,:::: ( l I I I .( I ( ( I i. I \. .. , I I I j: ( 'i (, f' I •'·:! {·' ( FUND NO WARRANT NCI. (;7(15~.3 07()5~'f CH55!:' OH556 C7fr557 07G~51' (l70~~4' n•l560 070561 07 (1 562 07(.56~ 07 ~·56't 0735~5 C7G56f· 01\1567 ll7J5H• i)l (15(.9 cnsn 07Ci571 (Jl!j572 fi7('573 CHl571f (:7t57!i u7(l576 07r577 CH57P (t7C1S 79 •H05ell 07(15[iJ C. H5A:? 0 7 D5P;!. tJ7t5A.q f;7iJ~18:. 0705k.f. 071'.'5f.7 {J7(!56f (;705Ac; JU59U 070591 .. r.71)59~ :Hfl5C3~ 0705t;:'f 07G5S~ CiHS5t- 070~97 07(,5% ( .. , ( qJ9G -Jl DIST \ICRKING ClcNTAl · ·-·-·---... ·· ·--····------·----.. ·--· -·--···-····--.... ·PROCESSING OHE A/17/B't PAGE 4 · REPORT NUHBCn AP43 CCU~TY S~NITATJON DISTRICTS OF OR~NGE COUNTY Cl A I HS· P-A Hr 0 8-12 2 l8 4 .. -·-·--·· ----· · ·--·-· • · VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION FACJFIC MCSILE OfFJr.rs •1u,5q~.56 OFFICE TRAILER rAr.o !7~!.39 PUMP PARTS f'.\C·lf ·1 C ~ AFET-Y ECW I ~f4f f\I T .. co, --... _ --.. _ ... ···--·· · --··-$-h 11'h8-2--..... _ ...... • ·SAFETY SUPPL I ES P~CJFIC SCIENTIFIC to. . $24.06 LAB SUPPLIES fASCAL & LUDWIG S9t41~.46 CONTRACTOR PW-123 PATTF.N CORF... -· · · ....... · -· · ... _ ---· ---.. : --·--·--· -·-·S8l~hH·"-..... · -ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FEt!tJ\JALT CCRP SA,1 115.62 POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE FO~[R DRIVES & CHAINS co. $7&.G8 ENGINE PARTS Hl\ROL[l PRIHPOSF ICf .. ------· ··· ··----... ,, ... -... ------~·-·--·-·-·--··"-S6U1BO .. -·--· --· .. ·-·INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE FROLRESSIV( STE[L SUrPLY $le524.35 STEEL STdCK fULSiFElOER $867.~q PUHP PARTS Al\INl:lO!to-OISPOSAL tr•• .... --· ---·--·-·-··-·· .. · · ... · · .. -.--.. 5-3.H·•·Oo .. ·--·-·--· ..... --·TRASH DISPOSAL RE-CY-KLECN CO~P. SlU6.50 ENGINE REPAIRS HI£. REGISlEll !5"2..25 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING THE ·-REG J ST-ER· ....... --· -· · ··----· ------------·------·-----$5-1l'h-U-----· ,.--------· lEOAl ADVERTISING Tti( REfl!BLIC SUFFLY co. or c'ALIF •• INC. S877.48 PIPE SUPPLIES REXNORD ELECTRONIC FRO~UCTS Sl4~,6q ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES HYNOLO--AlUHINUM SUFfL·\' CO• ··--·· · ··-··--·· ---·--·---· .. -·--·S6·3i87· .. ·· ...... · ..... STEEL STOCK ~ICGH CCRF i63.32 XEROX REPRODUCTION POL-A-CART $271.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES ~ow DOHAR -·6USIHflS" FORMS·------· -·-··· .. ·------·-------'."-U"fh(t2···-----·0FF·ICE···FORMS .. SANTA A~A ElECT~lC fOTOfS S2e8~1f.20 ELECTRIC HOTOR YVON~f SC~WAe St5.3? EMPLOYEE MILEAGE SCIUNE PRODUCTS·-·--"" --·"··-···· ·-··---....... -.. -·-·-----··--·U-1 ... hH····-·-·-·-··STORAGE RACK S(OPUS CORF. !222.lfO DISC MAINTENANCE r1TY OF SEAL BfACH 1125.25 WATER USEAGE · Hf\FENH~ ·CONVEYO~· ·COP.P •. ···--· ····------·-··----:--·--S·7P.h~--------·--··COMPRESSOR· ·PARTS· SESA~E APAP.T~ENTS $590.84 USE CHARGE OVERPAYHENT ~HA~ROCK SUPPLY $le51f6.72 TOOLS SH[ HIE RO· f'ACHJNfRV CO. ···· · -... · · ·-· ····------·-·----···,A5·•5e-..... ·-·······-·TRUCK· PARTS ~IGM~ CHE~JCAL CO $225·3~ . LAB CHEMICALS ~Hll~ FIPl ! SUFrLY• J~C $63~e31 PIPE SUPPLIES · -EiO • ·CO~ST-·· A lR GU"l:-1 l-Y· .. HANAGE-HENf ·DI STR I CJ-·--·--·--· .. S'Jh-50· --·--.. --.. PERM IT· ·FEE SOUTHC~U C~LJF. EPJSON c~. Sl361~76.86 POWER SO. CAL· GAS CO. Sl8e5H.lf8 NATURAL GAS so •. ft.l.JF-. TRANE··S.f PYll'f .... . ..... "·-.... --.... ---··-·-·-.... ue1,oo ·----·-;·VALVES souwnrn COUNTlE~ Ofl r.o. Hlt617.28 DIESEL FUEL SPAk~LlTTS DRINKING WAT£P Sl,~38.02 BOTTLED WATER -SFUL"\f. SPH·OOMfHP.·--------.... --·-·-.. -·--·--·-·-·-------'6,.r15---·-·--------·TRUCK· REPAIRS Ttff: SUFPLIF:llS • S3t576.25 TOOLS, SAFETY SUPPLIES J. wAYNE SYLVESTfP. $~5.94 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT TA Yl()ft -cuui;.. -. . -. .. . -· .. -.. . .... ··-"' ..... S5h6't 9.47 -. -··· '. ELEtTR I c PERSONNEL CARR I ERS; ELECTR I c CART PARTS lHO~rsoN L~CQU[R co. $le9B6.~4 PAINT SUPPLIES rHAN~O~ C. TIA $\~.2~ EMPLOYEE MILEAGE -lOMA.RC o ... · · · .... ·-· .... _ .. _ · ·-----· · -----· ---·· ·-· ···--·---·--· ---·--$91irch 1--0--·----.:.·----ElECTR I CAl; .. SUPPLI ES TO~v·s LOCK & SAft SEPVJf[ Sd4.t6 LOCK REPAIRS ·1·; I .:1 :1 ., ·, ' ,.i !'', I·: ;l'.~l ,., 1,.: I) I, f .·~ I I;·! ': '1 1. '; I• '' 1·: j·· I' ri i'-i .. 1 · ... i \ . .' I 1:: ' ·~: 'I·~ 1 •• ·.,· : I I, ,., (, t! I,; •· 1 I. ; i I I I ~ ' ' I ~ i J"i 't t:.1 1.I I I j I ! l.'i J 1.1 :-I ~ I' ;·. I· i-; ' .1 " ·r • 1r'.1 /j:j L! j. .... !111 t•i! ~I ' i,, t "· ··l ; I r··; , ..... L,! .._ ; ·J::3. , . I I Vl :··1 !·:~ t ... !..! ', .. 1..1 I I .:.1 I,. ,:·: ! I I I: r' : I q !.i l'.i I I .. ! ; ... 1 I I ::: FUND NO llARRANT Nfi. 07t'59C? ti706!'fo 07i)6(;] l'l7JH2 07t6(t~ OH604 ~ 7(1 60~ '17C6ii6 (.7\)6"7 C.H61Jf 0706\?9 P7':6H (170E l1 t:H612 07&£:1~ 07Ci61't t'7C61~ C•7Df.H 07Cf>l7 01 Of. J(j 07l'•6J c; C7'162r· !>H621 070622 07(623 n ,~i2q G7fi6L'~: (17 (•62t; ( 9·1°"1 --JT f)JST-WOAKJN(; Ct.FHH-··-···· --·--· ..... -·-· ·-··-·---........ ·· -·-·· .. -·--··PROC[SSHIG OATf. 8/J7/6'f PAGF: RE~ORT NUMSfR AP43 COUNTY S~NJTATION DISTRICTS OF OR~NGE COUNTY -----··--·· --·-· -·-·--·--·---·---·--· ----···-CtA·lMS-Pkf1)'-D81'2?/'Rq-·-·----·-··---·-....... ·· -· · - V£NliOR A~OUNT tESCR I PTJ ON TR,FFIC CONTROL sr~v1ct. INC. $277.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES TP.~JNING $36.00 PUBLICATIONS T'foc OH: AM f'R-l C-~·· Oft EV A tr I NC.----· · .... -----··----·---··-· --s-i ~3 962 -· -···· -·· EN G'I NE .. PARTS .... TkOMelTlA CORPORATJCN S2o~17.77 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK & AUTO SU~PLY• INC. $1t7~5.86 TRUCK PARTS TUf-E.5ALES-·-'· --. -........ -.... -...... _ .. -·· -· .. ·-----····--·-.. ·-saBG-;4Et' ......... ' PIPE SUPPLIES u.s. AUTO GLASS, r~r. $39.54 TRUCK REPAIRS u.s.o. CORF. Slq5.69 WELDING REPAIRS Fr. MJK ·Ul:H HO ---............ -· ---•. -....... -... --.. -· -·-·-----·----s5·tr!ci 'I 9 . ·-· ·---·· --CONTRACTOR PW-112 UNJO~ CIL CO. Of CALIF. $03.59 GASOLINE UNllED PARCEL SERVICE $52.97 DELIVERY SERVICE lltHlW-ST-A·Tf.S r·ouir·..-ENT··CClit" INC... -........ ··s·310;1t(I ..•.. COHPRESSOR PARTS U~JT£0 STAT£S SAf( fEPOSJT CO Sl~q.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES UNJVFRSITY ASSOCIATrs, TNC S696.Q4 PERSONNEL REFERENCE BOOKS VWn ··SC·I Hllif-1 e--··--··-· ·-· ----·---------·---·-----------" i1lif t1.-1~-... -.. --·-ue 'SUPPLHS ..... VALV[ & STEEL SUPPLY CO. iJ,542.12 VALVES VALVf Sf:'.RVICESt me.. S't77.84 VALVES VOTO MACH·JNe·---. .. ..... ... . .. ·--·· -.. ·-.. -·------·-· .. --·sroo;oo. ... . ENGINE REPAIRS W~ll~CE ! TIERNAN s1.oa4.60 FRE~GHT ~· . CAPL WARPf~ & CO. Sl~6.07 LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR ~.AT ~ON····----------· ... · .... ·· • ---·· ....... -... ---·-.. ·-·-·-·--·---..... $49?•·9t--·-·--·---· ERG I NE' PARTS WAUKESHA ENGINE ~ERVICEMTER $3,426.82 ENGINE PARTS ~(STI~GHO~Sf ELrCTRIC CORF s~21.01 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES e. ll• ·WHflSTONE· R"ASSOCIATfS · · ...... ··-··-··· · ·· ..... ~h~'}9i2Q··-·--COMPUTER PROGRAHMING ~.•Hl'Tf'lfY ALAKE C(l. sta1.1te CONTROL EQUIPHENT THOMAS L. WCOORUFF, IN(. 1t4.Q83.no LEGAL SERVICES ·)If.ROI< COkP .. -·----·-_ .. _. · ··· -~-·-·-· ·-------·--··· s·'1~9-.-5!\-· ···---· -'XEROX REPRODUCTION ZIP l(MPORARY FfRSONN£l S717.6C TEHPORARY HELP ··-···----· •. -· ··--··· .... -···---·------·--· --------·-··--·····-··· -·-··-· TOTAL tl~IMS f iJr ~~/~2/~4 S779t'fH·23 ----------------------------------------------· ·-·-·-··-·· ·-..•. .. ... . ~ ( . '.-; . ( 1··1 !: ,i I ' : .. !. ;j ; .. , )''• ···I : .. ji i i j I r: I I ! I ;·I -fl t·: 1••1 I J I d ·.i 'I i·i ; I I : .. , 1·. ! ! H) 1. ·1 r- . , ' I,, i •·I ii i I :I !'1 , .• 11 1: 1.:1 1..t H ( c I; ... ,, l ~ '. i <1 ~ 1.-:.- 1.'! 1,.! ! I .. i:·~a ( . I , . . : O'"> ::: ' I . I. ( i'· . I. ( I , 1: .. l ( r ; I·: !·.·; !;; 1"11 H r ·l ( r-: .. l"'l 1:1 ( J:I ( I • ( . .. . FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/17/84 REPORT NUMBER APlt3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUHMARY II OPER FUND #2 OPER FUND·----.... ·· --···----· · · · --· #2 F/R FUND #3 OPER FUND #3 F/R FUND --- 15 OPER FUND 16 OPER FUND -····-··--·-------..... _____ ··-... -·····--·· · #7 · OPER FUND . --· --·· .. -· ·---.. --. -... -·---·----------·---·--...... 17 F/R FUND #11 OPER FUND # 13 ACO FUND .. #5&6 OPER FUND #5&6 ACO FUND CLAIMS PAID 08/22/81t AHOUNT - $ 632.44 7;362~30 .. --------..... --· --· - 28.15 10,237."2 365;79 . 8,383.36 1.03 -------4,033;98 .. ____ ..... --------· 87,086.69 6,460.68 392.H 2,386.)6 1 • 611 • 00 ---·-··JT OPER FUND·--··-----------------------·--------·--···----------.. , ___ ·277~")38-: 80. . . ·---------------------· CORF 251,235.07 SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIHS INSURANCE FUND 1t1,331t.57 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' 'COHP ;--INSURANCE. FUND ------------· ..... ""2;754. 16 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 77,763.02 ··-· ---· ---·------···----.. --·-----·· TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 08/22/81t ··-··· · --------··---·-·-· -------.. $'"779~-~in. 2-j ----- . ' ··---·-· .. ------·--·· ·- I'•'.. l H . . -... ---·---· ----. ---. --------... ~ ( PAGE 6 - r . I f j I I i" 0 --1·.·1' [ ! 1·· .,,, l. ..... --; 1· r·• '·· ~1 1 :1 p.I i"I r1 ~ ~I ~I 1~ r1 ~,· b . . . -( ,,; j·•: I«; . j,, l:J ... , Fi . 1··:! L "l .. ·1 ... :•I . ·i ,. 1··: 4111 ··•, !'.'! I:! 1 :1 (j I'· ., COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC? NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING October 4, 1984 -3:00 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the adjourned regular meeting of October 3, 1984, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' administrative offices. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. In the absence of the Secretary, Rita J. Brown, Chairman Hanson appointed William B. Butler Secretary pro tem. The roll was called and the Secretary pro tem reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESENT: DIREC?ORS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS: Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset, Don Saltarelli Roger Stanton William H. Butler, Secretary pro tem, Jeff Esber, Gary Streed Vice Joint Chairman Don Griff in, Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel * * * * * * * * * * * * * Report of General Counsel re The General Counsel briefed the proposed Ordinance No. 105 Directors regarding the proposed connection fee ordinance and indicated that it would become effective 30 days after adoption. Mr. Woodruff advised that the fee schedules proposed in the ordinance would commence January 1, 1985, as set forth in Section 1 of the ordinance. The connection fees of $500 per dwelling unit and $100 per 1,000 square feet are to be used to pay for facilities to serve new development. Adoption of Proposed Ordinance No. 105 Following a general discussion it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 105, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Amending Ordinance No. 104, Establishing Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District. Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only1 and, FURTHER K>VED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 105 by title only. -. \ y -"10/04/84 Adopting Ordinance No. 105 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following roll call vote: That Ordinance No. 105, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Amending Ordinance No. 104, Establishing Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be adopted. ADS: Directors Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset, Don Saltarelli NOFS: None ABSENT: Director Roger Stanton Report of General Counsel re propgsed Ordinance No. 106 The General Counsel briefed the Directors regarding the proposed supplemental user fee ordinance and reported that, if adopted, it would become effective 30 days after adoption. Mr. Woodruff indicated that the supplemental user fees proposed in the ordinance would commence on July 1, 1985. The user fees will pay the escalating costs of operation and maintenance, including facilities rehabilitation and replacement, resulting from higher levels of treatment required by the Federal and State regulatory agencies to comply with Federal Clean Water Act and the State of California Ocean Plan. He further noted that should the Board elect to collect the supplemental user fee on the County tax rolls as allowed under California Health and Safety Code Section 5473, notices would have to be sent to all p~operty owners within the District and a public hearing held regarding this proposed billing method prior to July 1, 1985. Adoption of Proposed Ordinance No. 106 Following a brief discussion it was nDved, seconded and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 106, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only, and, FORTHER.K:>VED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 106 by title only. Adopting Ordinance.No. 106 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following roll call vote: That Ordinance No. 106, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Amending Ordinance No. 104, Establishing Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be adopted. AYES: Directors Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset, Don Saltarelli NOES: None ABSENT: Director Roger Stanton -2- .d.' ···. .. 10/04/84 Authorizing the General Manager to execute agreement with County Assessor's Office for Supplemental User Fee Data Base Development and EDP Support carried: Following a brief report by the Director of Finance regarding the support required from the County Assessor's Off ice to enable the District to implement a supplemental user fee program, it was moved, seconded and duly That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute an aqreement with the Orange County Assessor's Office for computer programming and EDP processing to provide data base information, mailing labels and parcel charge tapes relative to planning and implementation of supplemental user fees to be collected on the property tax bill, for an amount not to exceed $75,000. Directing staff to submit standard agreements for collection of District's connection fees to Cities of Santa Ana and Tustin and the Costa Mesa Sanitary District Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, directed to prepare and submit standard aqreements to the Cities of Santa Ana and Tustin and the Costa Mesa Sanitary District for collection of the District's connection fees, and to request approval of the agreements by the respective governing bodies of these agencies. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting. of the Board of Dir.ectors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 4:00 p.m., October 4, 1984. Secretary pro tem of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California -3- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING October 3, 1984 -2:00 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California * * * * * * * * * * * * * Adjournment of meeting Secretary pro tem by This 3rd day of October, 1984, at 2:00 p.m. being the time and place for the Adjourned Regular Meeting of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District No. 1 was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary pro tem to 3:00 p.m., Thursday, October 4, 1984, at the District's Administrative Offices. Secretary pro tem of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County California Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING September 26, 1984 -4:00 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of September 12, 1984,· the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' administrative offices. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. In the absence of Rita J. Brown, Secretary, Chairman Hanson appointed William B. Butler as Secretary pro tem. The roll was called and the Secretary pro tem reported a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRFSENT: DIRECTORS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS: Staff Report on Long-Range Financing Requirements Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset, Don· Saltarelli Roger Stanton J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, William H. Butler, Secretary pro tem, Thomas M. Dawes, Jeff Esber Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Conrad Bohener, Phil Stone The General Manager presented an overview of the District's financial position. He pointed out that during the 1984-85 budget deliberations in June and July the Boards had reviewed the Districts' five-year cash flow projections which forecast that the District will experience a revenue shortfall over the next five years of $17.6 million. When the budget was adopted, the Board had directed staff to study alternatives for meeting the District's long-range financial needs and report back. The revenue shortfall is primarily a result of escalating costs of providing sewerage services because of the higher levels of treatment required by the Federal and State regulatory agencies to comply with the Federal Clean water Act and the State of California Ocean Plan. Mr. Sylvester stated that in the event the Districts do not receive the pending ocean waiver, the financial situation will deteriorate even further. It was also pointed out that during the 1983-84-85 fiscal years District No. 1 would dip into reserves for a total of $3.3 million to pay the increased costs of operating and maintaining the new advanced treatment facilities constructed to comply with the laws, and that it would be necessary to consider instituting a system of fees for users to pay for their sewerage services to supplement ad valorem taxes which are now inadequate. Mr. Sylvester presented a detailed review of the five-year cash flow projections and outlined alternative methods of financing the District's capital and operating requirements to eliminate the projected shortfall over the next several years. The Director of Finance then presented a series of revised cash flows to highlight the District's anticipated financial position if proposed alternative financing methods were implemented to generate the funds necessary to finance the District's sewage collection, treatment and disposal requirements. The Directors then entered into an extended discussion regarding the merits of the available financing methods and the anticipated levels of fees necessary to put the District on a fiscally sound basis over the long term. The Board concluded that immediate.implementation of a financial program establishing a schedule of one-time connection fees for new development to pay for facilities expansion, and an annual user fee to pay for operation and maintenance costs including rehabilitation and replacement of facilities, is necessary to maintain the fiscal integrity of the District. The proposed fees are as follows: Single-Family Multi-Family Commerical Fee Type Residential Residential Ind/Govmntl One-time Connection $500/Dwelling $500/Dwelling $100/1,000 Fee Unit Annual user Fee $60.00 Introduction and First Reading of Proeosed Ordinance No. 105 Unit Square Feet $36.00 $42.95/1,000 Square Feet Moved, seconded and unanimously carried: Effective Date 1/01/85 7/01/85 That Ordinance No. 105, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Amending Ordinance No. 104, Establishing Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title only, and1 FURTHER H:>VED: · That reading of said ordinance in its entirety, be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 105 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 105, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 Amending Ordinance No. 104 Establishing Sewer connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be introduced and passed to the second reading on October 3, 1984, at 2:00 p.m. at the District's administrative offices. -2- 9/26/84 •· ·, ~ntroduction and First Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 106 Moved, seconded and unanimously carried: That Ordinance No. 106, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only, and1 FURTHER M:>VED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety, be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 106 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 106, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be introduced and passed to the second reading on October 3, 1984, at 2:00 p.m. at the District's administrative offices. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to October 3, 1984, for a second reading of proposed Ordinances Nos. 105 and 106. The Chairman then declared the meeting adjourned· at 5:30 p.m., September 26, 1984. -3- II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Co unty Sanita tio n Di st ri cts Pos t Office Box 8127 of Orange County, Cal iforn ia 10844 El lis Avenue Fountain Vol l ey, Calif., 92708 T elephones: JOINT BOARDS SUPPLE MENTAL AGENDA ITE MS OCTO BER 10) 19 84 -7:30 P.M. DISTRIC T 7 Areo Code 7 1 4 540-2910 9 6 2-2411 AG EH DA (2 5 ) (a ) Con side r at ion o f motion approvi ng and authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement with the Southern California Gas Company for: relocation of a 3-inch gas mai n in Ven Karman Av-=nue between the San Di ego Freeway and Main Street in connection wi th construction of the Von Karman Trunk Sew e ~, Contract No. 7 -8 , and authorizing payme n t in an ~nount not t o exceed $12 ,95 7.00 for said work DISTRICT 2 (28) (a ) Consideration of Resolution No . 84-18 0-2 , approving License Agreement wit h City Centre , a General Partnership, relative to construction of improvements wi th i n a portion of the area of the Di strict's easement over the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer , Contract No. 2-1 4-1 . See page "I " I - I • J RESOLUTION NO. 84-~80-2 APPROVING LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH CITY CENTRE, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, RE EASEMENT OVER DISTRICT CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH CITY CENTRE, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, IN cONNECTION WITH GRANT OF EASEMENT TO DISTRICT OVER THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Board of Directors on February 8, 1984, authorized the General Counsel and Deputy Chief Engineer to negotiate and acquire a Grant of Easement from City Centre, a General Partnership, for right-of-way to construct and maintain the District's Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-14-1; and, WHEREAS, said Grant of Easement dated March 8, 1984, was acquired for the amount of $95,000.00 and recorded on April 2, 1984; and, WHEREAS, City Centre now desires to construct certain improvements within a portion of the area of the District's easement. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, 00 HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain License Agreement dated October 10, 1984, by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 {Licensor) and City Centre, a General Partnership (Licensee), providing for construction of security wall by Licensee and installation of certain mechanical equipment within a portion of the area of Licensor's easement, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said License Agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1984. II I II AGENDA ITEM #28(A) -DISTRICT 2 II I II , \~ RE : AGENDA ITEM #7(B) lQ.Q4e•Q."--~·~1Dl\u,.o) COU NTY SANITA TION DISTRICTS of 0 RANGE Com nv. CALIFORN IA October 3, 1 98-1 Revised 1 0/8/84 PO.BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE M E M 0 R A N D U M To : J. Wayne Sylves t er From: Wi lliam H. Butler S ub j ec t: Pro9osition 36 Tax Rebates FOUNTAIN VALLE Y , CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (7 14 ) 962·2411 At your request, I contacted the County Auditor-Controller 's Office to disc uss the data present ed by the Auditor-Controller in the attached article from the Thursday, Se9tember 27, 1 984 edition of the Register . Chu ck Krueger was unavailable to discuss the article with me , but Neal Gruber, one o f Chuck 's assistants, had wo rk ed on the original data presented in the a rticle and provided the following background informa t ion : t~e County-wide estimate of $160 raillion in tax r ebates was generated from Orange Cour.ty 's percentage of state -wide assessed valuation made available to the County by the State the $29 mi llion to be rebated by speci2.l districts was calculated using all special dist ric ts ' historical share of the total County tax revenues from the basic levy our share of the $29 mil l ion to be rebatej by special districts County- wide is $6 million. AMOUNTS TO BE REB ATED Since the tax revenu e s that would be rebated by the Districts in the event Proposition 36 is passed are allocated to the individual Districts based upon the secured tax apportionment within each Dis~rict (refer to Column l on the attached worksheet), the followi ng table presents an est i mate of t he tax revenues each District would be require d to rebate: i of Total Secured Tax $ To Be District Apportionment-1984/85 Rebated 1 5.89 $ 353,400 2 26 .22 1,573,200 3 35.55 2 ,133 ,000 5 8 .03 481 ,800 6 6. 77 406 ,200 7 9. 72 583,200 11 7.82 469,200 'l'OTALS 100 .00 $6,000,0 00 ,. . Propositio, 36 Tax Rebates Page Two Octobe r 3 , 1984 R.evised 10/8/84 S?EC IAL ASSESSMENT Anothe r provision of the proposition that the Auditor -Controller t hinks will have a greate r impact on our Districts (as well as water districts) than the tax rebates is t he section requi r ing that the only special assessments allowed o n t!"le t ax bill a re those related to capital improvements , i.e ., bond interest and r edemp tion assessments . In o ther words , District 5 and 6 's e xisting special assessments as well as the proposed District 1 fees could no longer be collected v ia the tax bill according to the Auditor-Controller . I discussed this with Tom Wood ruff on October 3, and he believes that the provisions of Heal th & Safety Cod e Secti on 5473 .1 are not c omp romised by Proposition 36 , but he will r esearch t he proposition further to satisfy himself that h is int erpretation is correct . REBATE METHOD The Auditor-Controller indicated that were the proposition t o pass, the r ebates would probably be made via application o f a credit against the 19 8 5-86 tax bills Eo r affected properties. Based on th e 5-year ca sh proj e ctio ns present ed in the 1984 -85 budget, these re ba t es would affect the 1985-86 operating fund balances of the indi vidual Distri c ts as presented in the f o llowing tab le: 1985-86 Operating 1985-86 Operating Fund Balance (Deficit) Fund aalance (Deficit) District W/O Proo. 36 After Proo . 36 Rebates 1 (1 ,322 ,000) (1 ,675 ,400) 2 2 ,386,00 0 81 2,800 3 259 ,000 (1 ,874 ,000) 5 417 ,000 (64 ,800) 6 400 ,000 (6 ,200) 7 1 ,048 ,00 0 464 ,800 11 148,000 (321,2 00 ) As is evident fr om the table , passage of Proposition 36 will further increase the exis~ing 1985-86 deficit in District l 's o perating fund, and will also cause the operating f unds i n Districts 3 , 5 , 6 and 11 to fall into a deficit position in 1985 -86 . The additional deficit in Di stric t 1 furthe r supports adoption of a supplementa l user fee in this District. Districts 3 and 11 can transfer funds from their capital reserves to cover their ope rating expenses in 19 8 5-86 , but both Di st ricts will need to consider adoption of supplemental user fees in 19 86 -8 7 to avoid ongoing def ici ts in their operating funds a nd further dete ri oration of their capital r~s erves . Districts 5 and 6 will ~eed to consider increasing t heir existing supplemental user Eees (as much as will be allowed under t!"le restrictive prov isi ons of Proposition 36) in 1935 -86 to avoid fu ture de ficits in their operating f unds and in their capital funds , which are heavily committed to ongo i ng rehabilitation projects in t!1e District collection S'.fstems . WHB .12A&B . ( ~ I i : I l ) ( J ! . )i I I I I I I I l I I I l I I l . i : I ) ' I l . l I I J • . ' I ' Revised estimate of Prop. 36 talc rebate Measure would return $160 mi ll ion to OC property owners, official says By Judy Brennan The Regis te r Ora nge Co unty t axin g agenci e s may have to refu nd nearl y $160 million to property owners if Proposi tion 36 passes in November, County Au di tor- Contro ll er Steve Lew is said t his week. Thu t fig u re is abo ut $40 m ill io n hig he r t hun rhe estim a tes re leased by st a te legis la t ive and co unty ana lysts in Ap ril. Statewide, the la tes t estimate -$1.7 billion -is $400 millio n higher than the anti c ipated r eba te re leased in Ap ril, he said . 1 • "These are es t imates and t ha t's a ll t hey are," sa id Lewis. "But if Propos i- tion 36 passes these num be r s sho ul d no t U REBATE DEBATED : Two prominen t OC poli ticia ns fr om opposing pa rt ie s otte r opposi ng views on Pro positio n 36/013 IJ MISLEADING MAI LER?: A mall cam- pa ign support ing Proposition 36 is again causin g con fusion, tax officials say/B13 be too far off the .ma r k." T he bigges t b it e in co unty fun d s is a n es t ima t e d $8 0 mill ion reb a te in sc hoo l tax money, Lewis said . T he es t ima te given in Apr il was $20 million . Proposit io n 36 is the ini tiat ive thar ca ll s for a ro ll back of assessed property va lu es t o 1975 leve ls. Nicknamed "Jar- vi s IV " after t he an ti-tax activis t How- ard J arvis, it wo ul d do this by refuncting those pr operty taxes paid on th e 2-per- cen t value in crease allowed by Jarvis- backed Proposi t io n 13 in · 1978. ''S tate regu la tio n s had a ll owe d the 2 pe r cent to be app li ed r etroact iv e to 1975," Lewis said, "but P ropos it ion 36 seeks t o reverse this ." The initiat ive would also prevent the coun t y from increasing fees wi th ou t a two-thi rds vo te fro m the Legis la rur e. And th ose fees char ge d by th e co unty to use r s of a service wo uld then cove r onl y direct cos ts, Lew is said, no t employee pens ion benefi t s. Co unty officia ls es t i- mate tha t co ul d reduce revenues by $1 million to $3 mill ion annu a ll y, "depend- ing on the interp,re ta t io n s used ," Lew is said . Lewis said his $160-m illi on es t imate "' for t he one-time tax re fund was based on statewid e assessed property va lu es. "We too k th e s ta te figur es und ca me up wi th our percen tage," Lewis sa id . "We based it on parcels, no t peop le. We think these figures will be t he last estimat es . "And we don't think the state cou ld do any more detailed a nalysis a t th is point, primaril y beca use th e initi a ti ve , in many ways, is vag ue." But Lewis' breakdown on a nt ic ipa ted reba tes from the coun tywide taxin g agencies incl ude : $2 1 mill ion, coun ty gene r a l ; $2 mill io n, co un ty fire depa rt- ment; $1 milli on, co un ty li brary; $80 mill ion, sc hoo ls; $29 million, spec;ia l distric ts; $27 million, cities and comm u- ni t y deve lopmen t agencies. r Y'.\ ' RE: AGENDA ITEM #25 -DISTRICT 7 OTHER BUSINESS October 10, 1984 IW:REF:124 BACKGROUND STAFF REPORT STATUS REPORT FOR ELECTROLURGY, INC. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT NO. 7-162 On January 9, 1984, Electrolurgy entered into an Agreement with District No. 7. This agreement specified that Electrolurgy would install required pretreatment facilities and achieve compliance with permit conditions by May 31, 1984. Electrolurgy failed to meet this schedule and requested a compliance extension. In July the Agreement was amended by the Board to extend the completion date until August 7, 1984. The pretreatment system has been installed. Electrolurgy's plant effluent was tested on August 27, 1984, to determine compliance with the permit limitations. The results showed Electrolurgy to be in violation of pH, cadmium, copper, and zinc standards. During the week of September 10, 1984, chemical addition studies were conducted by the engineering companies that designed the wastewater treatment process and system. UPDATE By October 11, 1984, staff .is requ1r1ng Electrolurgy, Inc. to a) implement the engineer's recommendations for chemical optimization of the pretreat- ment system, b) install automatic level control as originally designed, c) provide an operation and maintenance manual as originally proposed, d) demonstrate consistent compliance with effluent limitations. Electro- lurgy, Inc. is working with their engineer to complete the above four (4) items. If based on the information and results presented by Electrolurgy, Inc. to the Districts by October 11, 1984, shows them to be in compliance, staff will issu e a new one-year, Class I permit . If found to be in non- compliance, the staff will proceed with further enforcement action. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN OCTOBER 10, 1984 1) ELECTION OF GENERAL MANAGER TO AMSA BOARD. I AM PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE THAT OUR GENERAL MANAGER, WAYNE SYLVESTER WAS ELECTED TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES AT A MEETING HELD LAST WEEK IN NEW ORLEANS. As YOU KNOW, AMSA IS MADE UP OF THE MAJOR SEWERAGE AGENCIES IN THE COUNTRY AND IS QUITE EFFECTIVE AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL IN WORKING WITH CONGRESS AND THE EPA ON WATER QUALITY MATTERS. 2) DISTRICT No. 1 LONG-RANGE FINANCIAL PROGRAM. MANY OF YOUR MAY REMEMBER THAT DURING THE BUDGET DELIBERATIONS, A SUBSTANTIAL REVENUE SHORTFALL WAS FORECAST FOR DISTRICT No. 1. AT THAT TIME, THE DISTRICT No. 1 BOARD DIRECTED THE STAFF TO PREPARE A LONG RANGE PLAN OF FINANCING ALTERNATIVES TO PROVIDE FOR THE NECESSARY FUNDING OF DISTRICT ACTIVITIES. THE DISTRICT No. 1 BOARD MET RECENTLY AND CONSIDERED THE ALTERNATIVES AND HAS ADOPTED A LONG RANGE FINANCIAL PROGRAM INSTITUTING A CONNECTION FEE SCHEDULE TO PROVIDE FOR PAYMENT OF FACILITIES CAPACITY BY NEW DEVELOPMENT; AND A USER FEE TO FINANCE ONGOING OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS. As WE ALL KNOW, THE COST OF TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL HAS ESCALATED RAPIDLY TO COMPLY WITH THE MORE STRINGENT TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY EPA AND THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD. DISTRICTS Nos. 5 AND 6 CURRENTLY HAVE USER FEES ALSO. EVENTUALLY, AS THE COSTS OF SEWAGE SERVICES CONTINUE TO RISE FASTER THAN AD VALOREM TAX REVENUE, IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE OTHER DISTRICTS TO FOLLOW SUIT. 3) COMMITTEE MEETINGS. SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF . THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 17TH AT 5:30 P.M. FOR A STATUS REPORT ON THE NEGOTIATIONS WITH IRWD REGARDING THE PROPOSED FORMATION OF DISTRICT No. 14. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE . I WOULD LIKE TO CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 24TH AT 5:30 P .M. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS: /~ ~ (\ ~.-10 . u).Jlf~~ ~ .. . d ~ lllMNI" CHARLES SYLVIA -OR- ~ -OR- MARTHA WEISHAUPT BUILDING COMMITTEE . THE BUILDING COMMITTEE WILL MEET -ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30TH AT 5:30 P.M. TO REVIEW THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE DISTRICTS' OFFICES. I WOULD LI KE TO ASK DIRECTOR RICHARD PARTIN OF THE CI TY OF ~ CYPRESS TO REPLACE GERALD MULLEN ON THAT COMMITTEE. MR. MULLEN RECENTLY RETIRED FROM ACTIVE STATUS ON THE BOARD. 61( FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE. THE NOTICE WITH YOUR AGENDA PACKAGE IN~ICATED A TENTATIVE DATE FOR THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE TO MEET ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23RD. HOWEVER, THAT DATE WILL NOT BE CONVENIENT FOR SOME DIRECTORS AND, SO, IF THERE IS NO OBJECTION, I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST A CHANGE TO WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 31ST AT 4:30 P.M. (NOTE CHAIRMAN EDGAR: As DISCUSSED, THIS IS HALLOWEEN, THUS, IF THIS IS NOT A GOOD TIME, THE MEETING COULD BE HELD EARLIER, OR ON ANOTHER DATE.) ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE WILL BE CONSI~ERING IS THE IMPACT OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES ON DISTRICTS' FINANCES. WE STILL HAVE NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE FROM ALL OF THE CITIES AND SO IF YOUR CITY PLANS TO SEND A LETTER, WE WOULD APPRECIATE RECEIVING IT WITHIN THE NEXT WEEK TO TEN DAYS. (NOTE CHAIRMAN EDGAR: FOR YOUR INFORMATION, ATTACHED IS A LISTING OF THE STATUS OF THE RESPONSES.) 4) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT PRESENTATION BY WILLARD BASCOM. THE DISTRICTS HAVE BEEN A PARTICIPANT IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT, ALONG WITH THE CITIES OF LOS: ANGELES AND SAN DIEGO AND THE VENTURA AND Los ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, TO STUDY THE EFFECTS OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE ON THE OCEAN OFF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COAST. SCCWRP IS A SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATION THAT HAS BEEN STUDYING OUR COASTAL WATERS SINCE 1969. ;"· I RECENTLY HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR SCCWRP's DIRECTOR, ...._,;· WILLARD BASCOM, GIVE A PRESENTATION ON SCCWRP' S FINDINGS AND THE CONDITION OF OUR COASTAL WATERS AT THE ANNUAL CASA CONFERENCE. WE ARE PLEASED TO HAVE MR. BASCOM WITH US TONIGHT TO GIVE US A PRESENTATION ON THE OCEAN WATERS OFF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTLINE. MR. BASCOM IS A WORLD RENOWN OCEANOGRAPHER WITH CREDENTIALS TOO NUMEROUS TO EVEN ATTEMPT TO MENTION. I'M SURE YOU'LL AGREE WITH ME AFTER YOU HEAR HIM THAT HE ALSO HAS THE UNIQUE TALENT OF BEING.ABLE TO TAKE A COMPLEX SUBJECT AND PRESENT IT IN A VERY CLEAR AND CONCISE MANNER. AGENCIES THAT HAVE FORMALLY RESPONDED ALREADY GARDEN GROVE HUNTINGTON BEACH NEWPORT BEACH ORANGE PLACENTIA (SANTA ANA -ALREADY HAVE AGREEMENTS WITH CITY FOR PASSTHROUGH OF TAXES) SEAL BEACH AGENCIES WITHOUT PROJECTS THAT DO NOT NEED TO CONTACT US COUNTY OF ORANGE LQS ALAMITOS VILLA PARK COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT GARDEN GROVE SANITARY DISTRICT MIDWAY CITY SANITARY DISTRICT AGENCIES WHOSE STAFF HAS CONTACTED US BUT WHICH HAYE NOT RESPONDED FORMALLY YET f OUNTAIN VALLEY FULLERTON TUSTIN AGENCIES WITH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS THAT HAVE NOT RESPONDED OR CONTACTED US YET ANAHEIM BREA BUENA PARK COSTA MESA CYPRESS LA HABRA LA PALMA STANTON WESTMINSTER YORBA LINDA -\J • ' REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN OCTOBER 10, 1984 1) ELECTION OF GENERAL MANAGER TO AMSA BOARD. I AM PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE THAT OUR GENERAL MANAGER, WAYNE SYLVESTER WAS ELECTED TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES AT A MEETING HELD LAST WEEK IN NEW ORLEANS. As YOU KNOW, AMSA IS MADE UP OF THE MAJOR SEWERAGE AGENCIES IN THE COUNTRY AND IS QUITE EFFECTIVE AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL IN WORKING WITH CONGRESS AND THE EPA ON WATER QUALITY MATTERS. 2) DISTRICT No. 1 LONG-RANGE FINANCIAL PROGRAM. MANY OF YOUR MAY REMEMBER THAT DURING THE BUDGET DELIBERATIONS, A SUBSTANTIAL REVENUE SHORTFALL WAS FORECAST FOR DISTRICT No. 1. AT THAT TIME, THE DISTRICT No. 1 BOARD DIRECTED THE STAFF TO PREPARE A LONG RANGE PLAN OF FINANCING ALTERNATIVES TO PROVIDE FOR THE NECESSARY FUNDING OF DISTRICT ACTIVITIES. THE DISTRICT No. 1 BOARD MET RECENTLY AND CONSIDERED THE ALTERNATIVES AND HAS ADOPTED A LONG RANGE FINANCIAL PROGRAM INSTITUTING A CONNECTION FEE SCHEDULE TO PROVIDE FOR PAYMENT OF FACILITIES CAPACITY BY NEW DEVELOPMENT; AND A USER FEE TO FINANCE ONGOING OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS. As WE ALL KNOW, THE COST OF TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL HAS ESCALATED RAPIDLY TO COMPLY WITH THE MORE STRINGENT TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY EPA AND THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD. DISTRICTS Nos. 5 AND 6 CURRENTLY HAVE USER FEES ALSO. EVENTUALLY, AS THE COSTS OF SEWAGE SERVICES CONTINUE TO RISE FASTER THAN AD VALOREM TAX REVENUE, IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE OTHER DISTRICTS TO FOLLOW SUIT. 3) COMMITTEE MEETINGS. SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF. THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 17TH AT 5:30 P.M. FOR A STATUS REPORT ON THE NEGOTIATIONS WITH IRWD REGARDING THE PROPOSED FORMATION OF DISTRICT No. 14. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. I WOULD LIKE TO CALL A MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 24TH AT 5:30 P.M. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS: ~VID SILL]) ~~ ::u. ..... 1;'• 9J) -• ~·S)ft..c, CHARLES SYLVIA -OR- c:::::;ioHN THOM~ -OR- MARTHA WEISHAUPT BUILDING COMMITTEE. THE BUILDING COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30TH AT 5:30 P.M. TO REVIEW THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE DISTRICTS' OFFICES. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK DIRECTOR RICHARD PARTIN OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS TO REPLACE GERALD MULLEN ON THAT COMMITTEE. MR. MULLEN RECENTLY RETIRED FROM ACTIVE STATUS ON THE BOARD. f)\( FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE. THE NOTICE WITH YOUR AGENDA PACKAGE INDICATED A TENTATIVE DATE FOR THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE TO MEET ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23RD. HOWEVER, THAT DATE WILL NOT BE CONVENIENT FOR SOME DIRECTORS AND, SO, IF THERE IS NO OBJECTION, I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST A CHANGE TO WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 31ST AT 4:30 P.M. (NOTE CHAIRMAN EDGAR: As DISCUSSED, THIS IS HALLOWEEN, THUS, IF THIS IS NOT A GOOD TIME, THE MEETING COULD BE HELD EARLIER, OR ON ANOTHER DATE.) ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE WILL BE CONSIDERING IS THE IMPACT OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES ON DISTRICTS' FINANCES. WE STILL HAVE NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE FROM ALL OF THE CITIES AND SO IF YOUR CITY PLANS TO SEND A LETTER, WE WOULD APPRECIATE RECEIVING IT WITHIN THE NEXT WEEK TO TEN DAYS. (NOTE CHAIRMAN EDGAR: FOR YOUR INFORMATION, ATTACHED IS A LISTING OF THE STATUS OF THE RESPONSES.) 4) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT PRESENTATION BY WILLARD BASCOM. THE DISTRICTS HAVE BEEN A PARTICIPANT IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT, ALONG WITH THE CITIES OF Los ANGELES AND SAN DIEGO AND THE VENTURA AND Los ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, TO STUDY THE EFFECTS OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE ON THE OCEAN OFF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COAST. SCCWRP IS A SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATION THAT HAS BEEN STUDYING OUR COASTAL WATERS SINCE 1969. , a I RECENTLY HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR SCCWRP's DIRECTOR, WILLARD BASCOM, GIVE A PRESENTATION ON SCCWRP's FINDINGS AND THE CONDITION OF OUR COASTAL WATERS AT THE ANNUAL CASA CONFERENCE. WE ARE PLEASED TO HAVE MR. BASCOM WITH US TONIGHT TO GIVE US A PRESENTATION ON THE OCEAN WATERS OFF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTLINE. MR. BASCOM IS A WORLD RENOWN OCEANOGRAPHER WITH CREDENTIALS TOO NUMEROUS TO EVEN ATTEMPT TO MENTION. I'M SURE YOU'LL AGREE WITH ME AFTER YOU HEAR HIM THAT HE ALSO HAS THE UNIQUE TALENT OF BEING ABLE TO TAKE A COMPLEX SUBJECT AND PRESENT IT IN A VERY CLEAR AND CONCISE MANNER. AGENCIES THAT HAVE FORMALLY RESPONDED ALREADY GARDEN GROVE HUNTINGTON BEACH NEWPORT BEACH ORANGE PLACENTIA (SANTA ANA -ALREADY HAVE AGREEMENTS WITH CITY FOR PASSTHROUGH OF TAXES) SEAL BEACH AGENCIES WITHOUT PROJECTS THAT DO NOT NEED TO CONTACT US COUNTY OF ORANGE Los ALAMITOS VILLA PARK COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT GARDEN GROVE SANITARY DISTRICT MIDWAY CITY SANITARY DISTRICT AGENCIES WHOSE STAFF HAS CONTACTED US BUT WHICH HAVE NOT RESPONDED FORMALLY YET FOUNTAIN VALLEY FULLERTON TUSTIN AGENCIES WITH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS THAT HAVE NOT RESPONDED OR CONTACTED US YET ANAHEIM BREA BUENA PARK COSTA MESA CYPRESS LA HABRA LA PALMA STANTON WESTMINSTER YORBA LINDA MEETING DATE October 10, 1984 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3·,S,6,7 & 11 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS !CRANK),,,,,,,,HANSON,,,,,, V°~ . LUXEMBOURGER),GRISET,,,,,,~ KENNEOy),,,,,,SALTARELLI,,_g._ WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON, ,,,,~ __ DISTRICT 2 MURPHY)•t•••••WEDAA,,,,,,,~ __ OVERHO~TJ,,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,, ~ NEWTON),,,,,,,BUCK,,,,,,,,"l::I:;;':::: NORBY). 11 I I ••• CATLIN •• I ••• ~ NELSON) ••••• ,.cooPER •••••• &..---- LUXEMBOURGERJ.GRISET •••••• ~::::: MAHONJY). I I ••• HOLMBERG I. I.~ --ODLUM ,,,,., •• KAWANAMI •• ,,~ __ ADLER ,,,,,,,,NEAL,,,,,,,.~ CULVER),~,,,,,PERRY,,,,,,,~:::: BEYER),,,,,,,,SMITH,,,,,,,~ __ WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON.,,,,~ __ DISTRICT 3 !OVERHOt,.T), I ••• ROTH. I. I 111 ~ ""' - COOPER) I I I I I •• ~fELSBU I I I I I .~ --RISNER) ••••••• BROWNELL 1111 ......-__ NORBV),,,,,,,,CATLIN •••••• ~ __ PERRY)t•••••••CULVER,,,,,,~ __ SEIDEl,.J I 11 I I I .FRESE •• I I. I I CL. -- DAVIS) •••••••• GRIFFIN ••••• ~ __ LUXEMBOURGER) .GR I SET I I I 11 ·~ -- !MAHONEY) I •• I' I HOLMBERG ••• I ........ ADLER),, •t,,, ,NEAL.••••••·~== FINLAYSONJ ~. ••••··~ __ MULLEN),,,,,,,PARTJN,,,,,,~ __ WIEDER~,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,~ __ (LANDER,,,,,,,,SYLVIA,,,,,.~- (MANDIC),,,,,,,THOMAS,,,,,,~ __ (SIRIANI) I. I. I .WEISHAUP1· I I·~ -- DISTRICT 5 !MAURER) I I·. I· ••• HART I. I. I I I • .,,,,, -- HEATHER), •• , •• PLUMMER ••••• -;::;;::- WIEDER) I I I I. I ,STANTON. I I I I . ._.......== DISTRICT 6 (SMITH) It I I •• I .WAHNER. I I •• I .......... (MAURER),,,,,,,HART,,,,,,,.~:::: (WIEDER). I I •• I .STANTON,. I •• ~ -- DISTRICT 7 (BEYER) I I •• ·.·, •• SMITH •••• I. I '-"""" -- (MAURER) ••••••• HART •• ,,,,,,~ __ !KENNEDY). I •••• EDGAR •• I I. I.~ LUXEMBOURGER) I GR I SET I I •• I'~ -- MILLER) ••••••• ~ •• Ill··~:::: WIEDE~),,,, ,,,STANTON,, ••• ~~~ (GREEN),,,,,,,,WAHNER,,,,,.~ -~ DISTRICT 11 (MANDIC),,,, ,,,BAILEY,,,,,,-lltt!!!:.. __ (MANDIC),,,,, ,,PATTINSON,,, ""1' (WIEDER) I I. I I I .STANTON. I I. ,-;;ii':::: 9/13/84 (MANOIC) I I I. I. I BAILEY •• I I.·~ RISNER),,,,,,,BROWNELL, ••• ~ -- NEWTON),,,,, ,,BUCK.,,,,,,,-'L.. -- NORBY). I I I •• I ,CATLIN •••• I·~ NELSON),,,,,,,COOPER,,,,,,~:::: PERRY) I •• I I I I .CULVER. I. I'·~ (KENNEDY),,,,,,EOGAR,,,,,,,-l.i!!::::: (SEIDEL),,,,,,,FRESE,,,,,,,J:a.L __ (OAVIS),,,,,,t,GRIFFIN,,.,,~ (LUXEMBOURGERJ.GR.ISET. I I I I • ..a...== (CRANK)t•••••••HANSON,,,,,,~ (MAURERJt•••••1HART,,,,,,,,~ -- ! MAHONEY) I 11 •• I HOLMBERG I. I.~== ODLUM),,,,,,,,KAWANAMJ,,,,~-ADLER)t•••••••NEAL,,,,,,,.~ __ COOPER) I • t I. I. NEl::GOfl I I •• I ·---=---FINLAYSON J •••• ~ ••••••• ~ (MULLEN) ••••••• PARTIN •• II··~:::::: (MANDJC) I I I I I •• PATTINSON •• ·~ --(CULVER), ••••• ,PERRY,,,,,,,~ __ (HEATHERJ,,,,,,PLUMMER,,,,,~ OVERHOLT),,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,,~ == KENNEDY),,,,,,SALTARELLI •• ~ MILLER),,,,,,,Stbb&.,,,,,.~::::: BEYER)~,,,,,,,SMITH,,,,,,.~ __ WIEDER ,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,~ __ LANDER ,,,,,,,SYLVIA,,,,,,~ MANDIC),,,,t,,THOMAS,,,,,.~ -- (GREEN/SMITHJ,,WAHNER, •••··~ == (MURPHY)t••••••WEDAA,,,,,,,~ ~(SiRIANIJ,,,,,,WEISHAUPT,,.~ __ s.IAEE: OTHERS: SYLVESTER. I·~ --CLARKE •••••• ~ __ DAWES,,,,,,,-11!!!!::. __ ANDERSON,,,.~ __ BUTLER,,,,,.~ __ BROWN,,,,,,,~ __ BAKER,,,,,,.~ __ KYLE,,,,, ••• ~ -- YOUNG,,,,,,·~·-VON LANGEN ~ __ WINSOR,,,,,,~ __ STREED,,,,,.~ __ WOODRUFF,,,,~·- ATKINS, I I I.·~ -- HOHENER. ••••--__ HOWARD,,,,,, _____ _ HUNT,,,,••··~ KEITH. I I I I I·--KNOPF ••••••• __ LE BLANC,,,, __ LINDSTROM I I·--LYNCH ••••• ,, __ MART I NSON I I·--PEARCE •••••• __ Qae.:...e ~·All\. w;JQ&MQ. ~,.- ~ti a a 2 L~ Q~~·. ~~ ~: .. ~"'-~ ' OCTOBER 10, 1984 JOINT MEETING NOTES #4 -Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items Joint Chairman Edgar recognized Ken Croker from the Sierra Club re agenda item i24 and David Blaser re item #12(a). #7(a) -Report of the Joint Chairman (1) Chairman Edgar stated he was pleased to announce that our General Manager, Wayne Sylvester, was elected to the Board of Directors of AMSA at a meeting held in New Orleans last week. AMSA is made up of the major sewerage agencies in the country and is quite effective at the national level in working with Congress and the EPA on water quality matters. He then congratulated Wayne. (2) Re District No. 1 long-range financial program, Mr. Edgar commented that many of the Directors may remember that during the budget deliberations, a substantial revenue shortfall was forecast for District No. 1. At that time, the District 1 Board directed the staff to prepare a long-range plan of financing alternatives to provide for the necessary funding of District activities. The District No. 1 Board met recently and considered the alternatives and has adopted a long-range financial program instituting a connection fee schedule to provide for payment of facilities capacity by new development; and a user fee to finance ongoing operating and maintenance costs. He added, as we all know, the cost of treatment and disposal has escalated rapidly to comply with the more stringent treatment requirements imposed by EPA and the State Water Resources Control Board. Districts Nos. 5 an 6 currently have user fees also. Eventually, as the costs of sewage services continue to rise faster than ad valorem revenue, it will be necessary for the other Districts to follow suit . (3) Chairman Edgar then announced that the Select Committee to Advise the Staff will meet on Wednesday, October 17th at 5:30 p.m . for a status report on the negotiations with IRWD regarding the proposed formation of District No . 14. He then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, October 24th at 5:30 p .m. and invited Directors David Sills and John Thomas to attend . David Sills' alternate Director, Sally Anne Miller, said she would advise him of the invitation. Mr. Edgar also called a meet ing of the Building Committee for Tuesday, October 30th at 5:30 p.rn. to review the proposed expansion of the Districts' offices. He asked Director Richard Partin of the City of Cypress to replace Gerald Mullen on that Committee as Mr. Mullen recently retired from active status on the Board. Mr. Partin indicated he would do so. Chairman Edgar advised that the notice with their agenda package indicated a tentative date for the Fiscal Policy Committee to meet on Tuesday, October 23rd. However, that date appeared to be inconvenient for some Directors and so he suggested Wednesday, October 31st at 4:30 p.m. Don Griffin mentioned that there was a League of Cities Workshop at Lake Arrowhead but no one else indicated they would be attending it, so Chairman Edgar stated that the meeting date would stay as indicated. ~ (4) The Joint Chairman then recognized Willard Bascom, Director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Mr. Edgar indicated that the Districts have been a participant in SCCWRP, along with the cities of Los Angeles and San Diego and the Ventura and Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, to study the effects of wastewater discharge on the ocean off the Southern California coast. SCCWRP is a scientific organization that has been studying our coastal waters since 1969. Chairman Edgar stated that he recently had an opportunity to hear Mr. Bascom give a presentation on SCCWRP's findings and the condition of our coastal waters at the annual CASA c~nference. He said we are pleased to have Mr. Bascom with us tonight to give us this presentation on the ocean waters off the Southern California coastline. He added that Mr. Bascom is a world renown oceanographer with credentials too numerous to attempt to mention and he has the unique talent of being able to take a complex subject and present it in a very clear and concise manner. Mr. Bascom then gave a brief slide presentation and talked about SCCWRP's studies and findings since 1969. They have found that there are more animals and species around the outfalls. Have found a very low level of contaminants which actually increase animal size but there are no subsequent reactions. Certain kinds of animals accumulate around outfalls that fit that food supply. It is a very good situation. They are physically healthy and well off. He added that SCCWRP is in the scientific business. They want to know what goes on and why. They have discovered that the biggest single effect is that caused by DDT which stopped being used 12 years ago. Metals in the sea are not toxic. Heavy metals which are bodies require such as copper and zinc are still regarded as toxic by EPA. This is not true of the organic forms of the metals in the ocean. Found six compounds at L.A. County Sanitation Districts' outfall that cause problems: DDT, DOE, PCB, 1242, 1254 and hexachlorophene.?? He further reviewed the types of things s 'tudied in the animals and how putting ten times more out the outfalls would have little affect on these animals one way or the other. He also reported on the extensive monitoring program required by EPA and stated that it had no scientific basis and required measurements that were totally irrelevant for which the cost would be ridiculous. He added that he has told EPA this. Chairman Edgar stated that Mr. Bascom's presentation highlights the position of the Sanitation Districts. We stand for good solid scientific data. Want to get the right facts. i7(b) -Report of the General Manager The General Manager reported that we still do not have our 30l(h) waiver. Is still held up in EPA's Washington, D.C. headquarters. We have attempted to contact Frank Covington but he is in Mexico City trying to resolve the sewage problem along the Tijuana border. We hope to hear from him tomorrow. JWS said that he had reported in June regarding the 1984 Amendments to the Clean Water Act that we didn't have time to get our wording inserted to allow the Districts' deep ocean research project to go forward. There is a bill in the Senate but it hasn't been moving. Congress is anxious to adjourn so it appears there will not be a Clean Water Bill in 1984. The current authorization will provide for funding of this study through next year but this means that when Congress reconvenes next year, they will have to start all over. Actually, think this will work to our advantage. Will keep Directors posted. -2- --· ' The General Manager then reported that the County Auditor-Controller recently released a report on the impact of the Jarvis Proposition 36 in terms of what the rebate provision would provide. An estimated $160 million would be rebated from County funds. The Executive Committee asked the staff to prepare a report for the Board and it was included in the Directors' folders. The affect on the Sanitation Districts would be $6 million and it would be distributed by District. If Jarvis IV passes, the individual Districts that do not presently have user fees may have to consider adoption a little earlier than they would have. He then referred to page 2 of the report. Said the County Auditor expects that if the initiative passes, the rebate would be made in the 1985-86 fiscal year. The other major impact is that it would make more difficult the procedure the Board is required to go through to adopt those type of fees. The staff will report further to the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee on this matters. With regard to the BKK Landfill discontinuing receiving hazardous waste material, t he Board of Supervisors has asked the staff to study this and report back in 30 days relative to possible illegal dumping of hazardous Class I material into the sewers. This is the only dump in Orange County that accepts this material. He said Blake Anderson participated in a meeting today to keep informed on the status of this situation. We wi l l continue to work closely in this effort. The General Manager then reported on two Supplemental Agenda items. In Distr ict No. 7 we are requesting authorization to execute an agreement with Southern California Gas Company to relocate a gas main in Von Karman Avenue. This will be required before the Von Karman Trunk Sewer project can be constructed. We are taking bids on i t on October 23rd and the District wi ll have 60 day s to award a contract. This is the project that IRWD will have to ma ke a decision on with regard to the i r participation re District No. 14. With regard to the District 2 item, several months ago we discussed the fact that one of our major trunk sewers, the Santa Ana River Interceptor, had no easement rights. We corrected that situation and acquired a sewer easement. Now the developer has completed construction and wishes to construct a wall. Staff recommends allowing that. He then referred to another matter not on the Supplemental Agenda. Mr . Sylvester said there was a Staff Report in the District 7 Directors' folders relati ve to the current situation on Electrolurgy's permit. In January the Board entered into an agreement to force Electrolurgy to meet our requirements. They requested a time extension and received it. They are still not in compliance but if they do comply by tomorrow, we wi ll issue t hem a permit. I f not in compliance by then, we will proceed wi th enforcement action . The General Manager requested that this Staff Report dated October 10, 1984, be received and filed under agenda item i25(b). i7(c) -Report of the General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that over the past few months, the Districts' General Manager, Wayne Sylvester, and a committee of people in the industry state-wide have been concerned about a prov i sion that exists in the federal law and the regulations requ i r i ng those agencies that receive a portion of their revenue ( through ad valorem taxes, as we do in this District, to provide noti ce annually to every property owner as to what portion is used for operation and maintenance . The position that had been taken by the State and EPA was that agencies like ourselves would have to provide a notice to every property owner and give it to them by a direct ma i ling. The expense of that could be upwards of $300,000 for the first year and annually thereafter $200,000. That notice would say that out of every dollar we get about 3¢ and 2¢ is used for operation and maintenance. He then stated that we are happy to report that we have convinced EPA that we could do t h i s by public notice in the newspapers--one in every Distr i ct. Would describe the boundary of the District and the average portion of the tax we get and what the impact would be. He added that Wayne Sylvester will be going to a Committee meeting tomorrow rega r ding this. -3- ~tl2{a) -I.W. Permit Policies The Joint Chairman recognized Mr. David Blaser. He stated that he would just like to make one point. The people in laundermats have already paid their taxes. However, the staff says that the federal government has precluded that argument and they must pay their proportionate share of the pretreatment costs. Asked, does that make sense to anyone else? The Joint Chairman explained that he thought that the real issue is that we are searching for fairness in apportioning the costs. We have to react to EPA. We fight them on many issues but if we don't have the facts, must go along with them . We presently have many ordinances that conform to the rules of EPA. If we go to EPA and say we are going to do something different, it is very difficult and costly. Based on Mr. Blaser's dialogue, we have recommended that we are going to try to be more fair that we have in the past. Payment of permit fees have been extended to three years rather than two. We have also tried to address the question of trying to identify a category of dischargers so that everybody in that category won't be charged for their use until we have captured the whole category in a geographic area. We think we have done a great deal in this motion to be more fair. To be absolutely perfect is almost impossible. Mr. Blaser said he couldn't understand regarding everybody starting at the same time. It was explained that all of those that were identified as of July 1st will be handled together. For those that are identified subsequent to July 1, 1 984, we have said that they will continue to be charged, but as we get further down with lower volume dischargers, we will hold all those in one category in a geographic area and bill them at one time . Mr. Edgar added that Mr. Blaser is one of the larger dischargers and if we go to lower dischargers, will have better equity. TLW added that the practical problem, as was presented to Directors by prior staff reports, is that we have laundromats from La Habra to Costa Mesa--hundreds of them and it is very hard to locate them all. When they do locate them, have to work through city water departments and/or other water departments and we are doing that. We have built up the staff of the I.W. Division over the last couple years to secure adequate permits for all industrial dischargers. We now have under permit several hundred more than the l million-gallons-per-day users called for and will keep reducing the limit to 3/4 million gallon users and then lower. The staff took into consideration the inequities of Mr. Blasers and others that have been permitted and have to pay fees while others are not permitted and are not paying yet. They suggest that until we locate everyone, shouldn't charge anyone. We have spent a lot of money to locate a lot of I .W. users. Staff recommends that those identified continue to pay fees and staff is working to locate the next group. Will concentrate in a geographic area. No one is suggesting that the system is perfect but no one has been able to devise a more equitable system. We are mandated to impose those charges. We have to collect from all those we know. We can't wait a couple years until we can cover the entire Districts. Edgar added that were we to back off and not charge them, we have millions of dollars of grant money from EPA that we could perhaps lose because we are not complying with their rules. Director Partin asked what kind of a money we were talking about re Mr. Blaser's fee? Was answered that the cost of treating the discharge is $430/year and the property owner receives credit for $10/year ad valorem taxes so the balance of $420 is the additional user fee charged. -4- Sally Anne Miller asked if it would be possible to pro rate the charge? Edgar replied that Mr. Blaser is already paying the fee and the staff didn't want to pro rate any of the fees. JWS added that everybody agrees that this system is methodical and systematic. We recently went to court and the court upheld the Districts' responsibiity. Roth stated that we have now had two open meetings and have had conunittees making a complete analysis of this. Considerable staff time and a great amount of paperwork has been done. The money is spent well and is doing what EPA requires us to do. Called for the question. Voice vote on motion. Motion carried unanimously. i24(b) -Report of Ultrasystems re District 13 EIR Phil Martin stated that 12 organizations have conunented on the EIR . They responded to all conunents. There were no significant impacts identified in the EIR or the comments associated with District No. 13. There were some conunents re future development within the Sanitation District but the Distr icts propose no development. Said he was available for any questions or comments . No questions. i24(d) -Verbal comments Mr. Floss (??) was recognized. He stated that they find the responses in the report to be quite acceptable and they understand the rational e for their conunents, but did want to go on record with their comments at the top of the ladder so they will work their way down. Mr. Edgar said he thought Mr. Floss understood that if development were to happen, it would have to be approved by local agencies. He said he understood that but just wanted to go on record with his opposition to development. -5- ifi~ ~c_ -µ72 of jo/o~{ · _ t) .:rws -~ 'tvfd-P-0 : ~kss/Ef1t--~a Aml/177£5 2) 5j){S/, I -[)~ ~; ~/t /gr t(F ,' l /1 /r:,~ ~ ~~'1 (~ V'it~/S , .·:;;(l~ ---------~~ ~M-N l (TeC: NTC S-.£ee _Jc_. f?.efo~ ' LDfL-~~ebM -Ohrfa7VE ! ~~©(!~ 81J ~iX:_/11_ (r:A J!711-IJ.)A{dj- -C~f~rf; ~10<..o'1'1 -g,o~fJr-4 ~r ~tt-3 - I I "!; - -~Le5~1 AL-(k{rl.-£ J No lj g_{--~ - --~ UJ . BD oF .SUt1Vnf7c_ <!.o~,sfu.L.fitJ.tJ/;-- _,... · t.:--fA -w~~ 1 De./ wtrJ!tiL1s / ~41_. F/&1 £1,()f!.G6 / l~ C{n/ W1e...~j#oll1l-- ' · 5 L-W!; P~~T M?o~ -• I ~ ~/MJtt-;i -)MW >9-Y1MllLi ~~ -U;uJ k='lt:t.,5 ~F ~{1}'11J~B I~ 4 ,ii ffeJtMAL ~::CE -f/ofltlE"rsu(z) -foJ1MAL~ lk~c.{!'Lu.~Ttffirftr711€" ~ ~Mfl-41 ... MD ~M.~ i}:U.-Ft?$j Brr,e:c-·y-J?,if/{.G' -c~--Pl>r/ ~ •• • 9 1 1stn;~IP!.> @.,1z, Vt~ IJ(fo -f~-,Jr -Prs.~; 1-14«£efo -AJ~,Jf--~.. M~ Nw.Jf .JM.fAc:ro~ uJfr11 ~Tile ©71/d-- I -,t.-1.t-~ l)J f)k.M?'A ~ T~l. -ttJofW1c_ ~ ,' ~(7 ffc'iU:.?1.s. _ -MeT/Jf/'-~ /(JflleLoff.lwtci -&w.e-J>1Fficul.17c;;! 1 fur /Jie fAfE - -&-91{s.-@_fa 1coo ~fw~ -.$) i fko/r1--r-; /f;uurA.tJp -µ;1..u/5t,e-1,J &o7 ~11 -IM-flrtt;;J C(Jt::AJc..t~I-4CrlJfJcL : ~1..v..&1,,11"{ w/r~ 'Ko;>y - > f -otJt-'1 _£_ ~}{f()l.A~µ_s. 7?M7 /Jf7-e-ff--OIS~S. ,· lACl-fJ -pJ>rjDPi::/ 'Pc.~ -/2-1-2-/thf /!Ki~MGJttW/ - I . -ii x ;,ml-€->J.b.J7i9' ww.l.l}J r-lfu-.flf; e11!4--~ v tJ {7-Af}c f) t(#,)1 ~ ~ l~frf-(~1 c_ f4?J1}1..S. -~ -flt~j ~ "J;vvel,sbtE -~i'i MJt/'1,;:e ~oE8A--~~ 1~ t?Nvr- l '1 ;a' - l; -.. I ~ " "'I -.--.......... -.. .. .. -- ·-~€ eF~? -;;c ' ftN ~f.oStfc.~ -'fx;1TOH//(:C/€5) 4i0r#ftc AttP-~tfi.r -) .. -µcJht4 If) f_Jj~Nf f!Y ·-.. -• I - -']YiJI ;~'])It I '/>Oo/f I~ 11-f "1 M/I</ -feq_ ti-f MU:-7'. fil_tz, Y66?~ wd--~ - tf'/f~fA? I VltltU..h?I)~ I ;GttJWfl/{)J,(n_ UMff~.I.il0 ·~-17:t:>b11.ffl...«~l::S - r;..---~-L<£u:-':f-1_/Zef.__.! 'f.ci>IA.TliJ e '/ cuf -~ oF feffiJ£wt ffr!pf. i!H8Jr1--T ~ frir'1 t.:tJet.,1-I -=-a -MD1J1rr:t?llJ& Pfot/JM.. ~ -R){-reNJ.tvc ffiJ,/)#1-t~; IJ~i ,ft.1trJT7.JTf!) ;6o µ~'( ~~- 1 ' .,...?:.' \ ..Arf' ~<' • . • ~71 Tf/1fl ¥e;-.Jf!k_c..€Y~r-1~~rup. I I -e .1 -_ r f\'}vrnc J-T!Nf>tB ~ ft--Pl-<oH .ffUPt€5-Pf-t51?iJF l6. 1/t./PtJcn:-!J ,1-k-il.r -J~t:JS<.(k-~ ,Jllf.Et l?f -~ WTR-OL #-6 e?<rJrs ( -lknlolor,,rtr 4-llei<l : 'CL1 ,JJJ h1c<.J - , . j,,~ 1vttrn&L-1 ~ -TM=( ~ f /!fJ lJutM.,~ _ ;Jo 07/ff;:-'L tk6 W //f J>te 1 7}H;je--.. ~ T~-. -,. r • 1[11)-rw?·~ !JE. :?c 1('-') cfa1V£"f--;J pc., ;Ip -C!{;ltJ6TlJ~: 1J ~X1u, urr- 11:ru.~A ~ StWAtk fkBLt:JV( - __. ~&k.s : ,J:tr YefrL (r1r{L u,J~ -IH4.t::~1~-iJ~ - ... --tm" .ffd. _g~ fd'o~ : 7b ffc. MD ef.B:---? ( -~ :;t! .._ -]>k..~ ~ t "-; .. t - -i)( oJ ~ Jbc!>/, 7-~DCAfcr~: ~1.oenn;-?'' b~ J.,(4'1~ ~ ·-u(<>J: -,.. .. • 'r -2-"'f .' f;{s./. 1--~w.U~ ~ -I .. - 7CG) TiW -h-r>L. ~ felrudtt IW-fe:£iV1~'-"/)1Jf1,fm TDffeiVti:'F /kJN•i.,f+L.\lci7Ct:?' 1(:>.AU. ft-Of~ 9-<J.JtJEtl-J-f:i-NoT7CE .' J. 5oo ~oo -(Jr YI-' 'i\O ooo - I --~ I ' f f> I I f ~ ~NUAu-1 ~~ -/:f~ "' It. . -- L • ..,.. -!..-.. • l r I .. . I -.. I 24-) -r;, liN<? (] UJ'1fJL '. we f '1 lW>~.5 µ., 7i'1;,Ye>-/;Jfl, Mii ',, 77/HP ~ut!f 7 ... · ·-It : eP~ i/A,S Mf /t>vf::::n 9-JvfL 9f.l>1~~1 ft:(~ ~6/!lhV( - _ • /A.onoN : (IL)~ fth!.rrrB?/ffJ.t-crfi>L:j V!?,1-i'J • .t r ..... .._ ~)EB ct~~~o~ (~~ ~op..,J-71/6J ~4-U (;);!lf1~ . - ~/Wrlfr!IJL ,4f.m -11- -W ti[PUn~ ~ ~~ UffiJ I -Z~! fJt>/v1-feiA-V7fi-Y4-lt¥/vfL:JiJ ~~~:;_l~;:;J~Atb- (b)-.. . I .. - I -- -2-<(~) -bm u:J€ ~ D/L " 1 \ b) -/!c I// flu! &'-i:;q--f!-oLu.li'1 f2fr: --lr- ~--Au ~N.~. • .... i . ....--.. t .. - " J -... .. 1r -· I ·-I -. r-• -• • • I • I f F ._ -"'I I t ""' . -- -' ~-· .... coum SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE coum, CALIFORNIA . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING 011 OCTOBER 10, 1984 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 EI.IJS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on October 10, 1984, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 an'\.J 11 as follows: DISTRICT NO. 1: DISTRICT NO. 2: DISTRICT NO. 3: DISTRICT NO. 5: DISTRICT NO. 6: DISTRICT NO. 7: DISTRICT NO. 11: AC?IVE DIRECTORS x Robert Hanson, Chairman a Dan Griset, Chairman pro tern __ a_Don Saltarelli ....L_Roger Stanton x Henry Wedaa, Chairman x Don Roth, Chairman pro tem a Richard Buck x Buck Catlin _!_Sam Cooper __ a_Dan Griset _a_John Holmberg __ x_Carol Kawanami ~James Neal x Bob Perry x Don Smith __ x_Roger Stanton __ x_Don Roth, Chairman ___ carrey Nelson x Oscar Brownell x Buck Catlin ....L_Norman Culver a Henry Frese x Don Griff in __ a_Dan Griset a John Holmberg --X-James Neal ---Richard Olson x Richard Partin __ x_Roger Stanton x Charles Sylvia --x-John A. Thomas x Martha Weishaupt x Evelyn Hart, Chairman x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tern __ x_Roger Stanton x James Wahner, Chairman x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem __ x_Roger Stanton x Don Smith, Chairman --X-Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem --x-Richard Edgar --a-Dan Griset --David Sills x Roger Stan ton x James Wahner x Ruth Bailey, Chairman x Ron Pattinson __ x_Roger Stanton -2- ALTERNATE DIRECTORS _orma Crank ___ Robert Luxembourger ___ Ursula Kennedy ___ Harriett Wieder __ Todd Murphy ___ E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. Arthur Newton --Chris Norby _____ carrey Nelson ___ Robert Luxembourger __ Bill Mahoney __ William Odlum ___ Marvin P. Adler ___ Norman Culver ___ Gene Beyer ___ Harriett Wieder ___ H. Llewellyn Overholt __ x_Sam Cooper ___ Joyce Risner ___ Chris Norby ___ Bob Perry _Norma Seidel ___ Jesse Davis ___ Robert Luxembourger __ Bill Mahoney ___ Marvin P. Adler _!__Bruce Finlayson __ Gerald Mullen ___ Harriett Wieder ___ ._David Lander ___ Robert P. Mandie, Jr. Jean Siriani --' Philip Maurer Jacqueline Heather __ Harriett Wieder Steven Smith Philip Maurer __ Harriett Wieder __ Gene Beyer ___ Philip Maurer ___ Ursula Kennedy ___ Robert Luxembourger ....L_Sally Anne Miller ___ Harriett Wieder ___ Harry Green Don MacAllister ---Robert Mandie ---Harriett Wieder /-"Ill. -· i '10/10/84 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: DISTRICT 1 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, William H. Butler, William N. Clarke, Thomas M. Dawes, Blake Anderson, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Ray Young, Richard von Langen, Chuck Winsor, Bob Ooten, Gary Streed Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Suzanne Atkins, Harvey Hunt, David Blaser, Willard Bascom, Kenneth Croker, Phil Martin, Gordon Ruser, Connie Spenger * * * * * * * * * * * * * Adjournment of meeting by Secretary This being the 10th day of October, 1984, at 7:30 p.m., being the time and place for the Regular Meeting of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Boand present, the meeting of District No. 1 was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting ·held September 12, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1984, the Chairman ordered that sai~ minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 Report of the Joint Chairman been elected to the Board Agencies (AMSA). AMSA is Chairman Edgar reported that he was pleased to announce that the Districts' General Manager, Wayne Sylvester, had of Directors of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage made up of the major sewerage agencies in the country -3- 10/10/84 ... and is quite effective at the national level in working with Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency on water quality matters. The Joint Chairman reported that the District No. l Board of Directors had recently approved a financial plan to address the substantial revenue shortfalls that were forecast for District No. 1 at the time of the budget deliberations. Be reported that the District No. 1 Directors, after considering alternative measures to provide for the funding of increasing costs brought about by more stringent state and federal requirements, adopted a long-range financial program instituting a connection fee schedule to provide for payment of facilities capacity by new development and a user fee to finance ongoing operating and maintenance costs. Chairman Edgar made the following Committee announcements: The Select Committee to Advise the Staff would meet on Wednesday, October 17th, at 5:30 p.m. The .Executive Committee would meet on Wednesday, October 24th, at 5:30 p.m. Directors David Sills and John Thomas were invited to attend and participate in the discussions. The Building Committee would meet on Tuesday, October 30th, at 5:30 p.m. to review the proposed expansion of the Districts' offices. The Joint Chairman also appointed Director Richard Partin to serve on the Building Committee to replace Director Gerald Mullen who recently retired from active status on the Board. The Fiscal Policy Committee would meet on Wednesday, October 31st, at 4:30 p.m. Report on SCCWRP Activities The Joint Chairman introduced Mr. Willard Bascom, Director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP). The Districts have been a participant in SCCWRP, along with the cities of Los Angeles and San Diego and the Ventura and Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, to study the affects of the wastewater discharge on the ocean off the Southern California coast. SCCWRP is a scientific organization that has been studying our coastal waters since 1969. Mr. Bascom gave a slide presentation and briefly reviewed the results of SCCWRP's studies since 1969. Be indicated that they have found a larger concentration of animals and species around the outfalls. They also discovered that the low level of contaminents present actu~lly increase the animals' size with no subsequent reactions. Only certain kinds of animals accumulate around the outfalls which fit the food supply there, creating a very good situation. SCCWRP's studies have revealed that the biggest single effect on the sea animals is caused by DDT in the water even though DDT stopped being used 12 years ago. He stated that metals found in the sea are not toxic. Be further reviewed the types of tests performed on the animals and stated that their analysis shows that even if the outfalls were to discharge 10 times the amount they do now, it would have little affect on the animals one way or the other. Mr. Bascom added that the extensive monitoring program r.equired by the Environmental Protection Agency had no scientific basis. The measurements they require are totally irrelevant and extremely costly. He indicated that he had reported these findings to EPA. -4- \._1 'fl!. -. ·10/10/84 The Joint Chairman stated that Mr. Bascom's presentation highlighted the position of SCCWRP and of the Districts. Both agencies want good scientific data to present to EPA as a basis for establishing rules and regulations for discharging into the ocean and for prescribing monitoring requirements that provide worthwhile information. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 'The General Manager reported that approval of the Districts' 30l(h) Waiver/NPDES Permit had not yet been It is still pending at EPA's headquarters in Washington, D.C. Report of the General Manager received. Mr. Sylvester briefly reported on the status of legislation being considered by Congress that would allow the Districts' proposed research planning study re deep ocean disposal of sludge to continue. He indicated that it appeared as if Congress would adjourn without adopting the 1984 Amendments to the Clean Water Act, thus, when Congress reconvenes in 1985, they will have to start all over again with legislation to reauthorize the Act. We will continue our efforts on the proposed legislation at that time. The General Manager reported that the County-Auditor Controller had recently released a report on the impact of Proposition 36 with regard to possible tax rebates. An estimated $160 million would have to be rebated county-wide if the initiative passes. He referred Directors to a report prepared by staff and included in the meeting folders indicating that the Districts would have to rebate approximately $6 million. The rebate would be made in the 1985-86 fiscal year. Districts that do not presently have user fees may have to consider adoption of such fees sooner than anticipated if Proposition 36 passes because of its impact. Mr. Sylvester commented on the announcement that the BKK Landfill in West Covina will soon discontinue receiving hazardous waste material. He reported that the Board of Supe~visors had asked the County staff to study the possibility of illegal dumping of hazardous materials as a result of BKK's action. He stated that the Districts' staff has been asked to participate in the study and will work closely with the County on this matter. The General Manager reported on Supplemental Agenda items. In District No. 7 the staff is requesting authorization to execute an agreement with Southern California Gas Company to relocate a gas main in Von Karman Avenue in connection with construction of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8. Bids will be taken on this project on October 23. In District No. 2, several months ago the District secured an easement over the Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-14-1, from a developer that has recently completed construction work in this area and has requested permission to build a wall that would encroach on the District's easement. Staff recommends approval of the request. Mr. Sylvester then referred to a Staff Report in the District No. 7 Directors' folders relative to the status of Electrolurgy, Inc.•s compliance with the Stipulated Agreement re Industrial Waste Permit No. 7-162. He indicated that the firm is not yet in compliance but would be tested again the following day. If they are in compliance at that time, a permit will be issued. However, if they do not comply, the District will proceed with enforcement action. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported that over the past few months the Districts' General Manager had chaired a state-wide -s- 10/10/84 subcommittee of Tri-Tac which was concerned about a provision that exists in the Federal Law and in the regulations requiring those agencies that receive a portion of their revenue through ad valorem taxes to provide notice annually to every property owner as to what portion of their ad valorem tax is used for sewerage services. The State and EPA had taken a position that agencies such as ours would have to provide this notice by a direct mailing to every property owner. The expense of a direct mailing would be in excess of $300,000 for the first year and $200,000 annually thereafter. Mr. Woodruff stated that he was pleased to report that we have convinced the Environmental Protection Agency that we could do this by publication of a notice in a newspaper in each District, thus saving the Districts' taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars annually. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - Joint working Capital Fund Self-Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICTS NOS • 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT DISTRICTS 2i 3i Si 6£ 7 & 11 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Job No. P2-SR-2 . 9/05/84 9/19/84 $ 529,798.51 $253,379.63 1,505,836.31 86,337.36 53,789.75 69, 731. 20 5,018.13 1,192.50 2,942.66 9,206.48 6,538.51 112,193.60 9,194.32 7,464.43 41,039.91 7,254.28 855.14 15,211.44 6,790.83 13,299.68 4,873.29 26.20 1,020.50 14.62 46.65 $2i259i388.12 $483£667.81 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins F & G at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2, making miscellaneous clarifications, changes and additions to said specifications, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, Si 6£ 7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Job No. P2-5R-2 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-170, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Primary Sedimentation Basins F & G at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2, to Advanco Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $783,464.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -6- r; • .. 0, -. DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 6, 7 & 11 Approving plans and specifications re Job No. I-2R-2A Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors her~by adopt Resolution No. 84-171, approving plans and specifications for Supplemental Repair of Bushard Trunk, Phase II, Job No. I-2R-2A, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 6, 7 & 11 Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications re Job No. P2-25-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-25-2, authorizing an addition of $35,192.09 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for 11 miscellaneous items of additional work and granting a time extension of two calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 6, 7 & 11 Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications re Job No. P2-26 Moved, seconded and d~ly carried: That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Primary Sedimentation Basins P & Q at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-26, revising the grading and paving requirements and modifying the entrance gate area improvements, at no increase to the contract with Pascal and Ludwig Engineers, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 6, 7 & 11 Accepting Job No. PW-116 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-172, accepting UPS (Uninterrupted Pc:Mer Source) System for Plant No. 2 RPU's (Remote Processing Units), Job No. PW-116, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 6, 7 & 11 Approving plans and specifications re Job No. PW-129 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-173, approving plans and specifications for Lube Oil Storage Tank at Foster Pump Station, Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-129, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 6, 7 & 11 Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order for Two-Way Radio Equipment, Specification No. E-156 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Motorola Corporation for purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment, Specification No. E-156, for the negotiated amount of $10,248.00 plus tax and freight. -7- 10/10/84 DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract to Furnish, Deliver and Supply Chlorine in That the Boards of Directors hereby Bulk at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, adopt Resolution No. 84-174, to receive Specification No. C-015 and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract to Furnish, Deliver and Supply Chlorine in Bulk at Plants Nos. l and 2, Specification No. C-015, to Olympic Chemical Company at the price of $156.00 per ton. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Remanufacture Six Cylinder Beads, Specification No. R-016 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Transamerica Delaval, Inc. to Remanufacture Six Cylinder Heads for No. 2 Delaval Engine at the Plant No. 1 Blower Building, Specification No. for an amount not to exceed $25,326.00 plus sales tax and freight. the R-016, DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 Authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase order to National Filter Media Corporation re Specification No. E-157 freight, for Ten (10) Sets of Belts and 2, Specification No. E-157, for DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 Receive, file and deny claim of Donald D. St. John Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate and issue a purchase order to National Filter Media Corporation in an amount not to exceed $40,000.00 plus tax and for the Belt Filter Presses at Plants Nos. 1 long-term testing of said belts. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the claim of Donald o. St. John, dated August 12, 1984, in the amount of $178.11 for damages to his vehicle allegedly due to a rock thrown from a District sludge hauling truck, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, and deniedi and, FURTHER !DVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action. DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 6, 7 & 11 Authorizing staff to issue a Purchase Order Contract to International TechnologY Group for maintenance services on accounting mini-computer system mini-computer system, for an amount Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a Purchase Order Contract to International Technology Group, Inc. for annual maintenance and support services on the new upgraded accounting not to exceed $18,000 per yeari and, FURTHER M:>VED: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to cancel the existing agreement with Digidyne Computer Services for maintenance on the old system. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on September 26, 1984, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -8- ·10/10/84 DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 6, 7 & 11 Receive, file and approve Report and Recommendations re Industrial waste Permit Policies & Procedures The Joint Chairman recognized Mr. David Blaser, owner of Gene's Launderland in Fountain Valley, who had previously requested relief from the provisions of the Districts' Industrial Waste Ordinance. Mr. Blaser contended that laundromat owners are being charged unfairly when they have to pay a use fee as required by the ordinance. He stated that he understood that the federal government had precluded his argument and that laundromats must pay their proportionate share of the treatment costs but he did not agree with the rationale. The Joint Chairman explained that the Districts' policy relative to apportioning the treatment and disposal costs is based on federally-mandated regulations. He then reviewed the changes in policy the staff had proposed, which had been endorsed by the Executive Committee, to try to be as equitable as possible for wastewater dischargers. The Districts' General Counsel also briefly reviewed the procedures followed by the District in identifying and permitting industrial and commercial users and the basis for said procedures. Following further comments by the Directors, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Summary Staff Report and Recommendations re Industrial Waste Permit Policies and Procedures, dated September 20, 1984, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 2, 3, S, 6, 7 & 11 Approving and authorizing execution of Amendment No. 7 to Agreement for Employment of General Counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-175, approving and authorizing execution of Amendment No. 7 to Agreement for Employment of General Counsel. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., October 10, 1984. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., October 10, 1984. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of Robert and Gayle Hoffman That the claim submitted by Robert and Gayle Hoffman dated September 6, 1984, in the amount of $164.83 for damages to their vehicle allegedly due to an improperly seated manhole cover, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied~ and, FURTHER M'.'.>VED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action. -9- 10/10/84 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:43 p.m., October 10, 1984. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:43 p.m., October 10, 1984. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Actions relative to Final Focused EIR re formation of proposed District No. 13 Receive and file Staff Re;port Summarizing Final EIR The following actions relative to the Final Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of proposed District No. 13 were taken: That the Staff Report dated October 1, 1984 summarizing the Final Focused EIR re formation of proposed District No. 13, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Verbal report of EIR consultant, Ultrasystems, Inc. The Chair recognized Mr. Phil Martin of Ultrasystems, Inc., the Districts' EIR consultant, who briefly reviewed the comments received on the Draft Focused EIR re formation of proposed District No. 13. He indicated that comments were received from a total of 12 organizations. Ultrasystems responded to all comments. He stated that no significant adverse impacts were identified in the EIR nor in any of the comments received. There were some comments made with regard to future development within proposed District No. 13 but no development is proposed by the Sanitation District. Receive and file written comments re Draft Focused EIR Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written comments received after the public hearing on August 8, 1984, from the following, relative to the Final Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of proposed District No. 13, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: The Irvine Company, dated August 29, 1984 Sierra Club, dated September 8, 1984 Sea and Sage Audubon, dated September 9, 1984 southern California Botanists, dated September 10, 1984 Oral public comment The Chair recognized Mr. Ken Croker representing the Sierra Club who addressed the Board. Be indicated that he found the responses of Ultrasystems in the Final EIR quite acceptable and understood their rationale. However, he just wanted the Sierra Club's opposition to development of proposed District No. 13 to be made a matter of record. The Joint Chairman reiterated that the District proposes no development and any future development would have to be approved by local agencies. -10- •10/10/84 Receive, file and approve Final Moved, seconded and duly carried: Focused EIR re proposed District No. 13 That the Final Focused EIR re formation of proposed District No. 13, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards hereby certify that said Final Focused EIR has been completed in compliance with the State and District Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. Certifying Final Focused EIR re Moved, seconded and duly carried: formation of proposed District No. 13 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-177, certifying the Final Focused EIR on said formation of proposed District No. 13, making certain findings in connection therewith, and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination re said formation. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive·and file Staff Report re Contract No. 7-9 That the Staff Report dated September 25, 1984, relative to construction of the Fairview Subtrunk Connection to the Sunflower Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 7-9, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing the General Manager to negotiate and issue a purchase order for construction of Contract No. 7-9 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate and issue a purchase order to C.J. Segerstrom & Sons for construction of the Fairview Subtrunk Connection to the Sunflower Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 7-9, for an amount not to exceed $19,200.00. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 96 - Horn Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-179-7, ordering annexation of 3.508 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the intersection of La Cuesta Drive, East Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated County of Orange territory, proposed Annexation No. 96 -Horn Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Approving and authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement with Southern California Gas Company re Contract No. 7-8 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the agreement with the Southern California Gas Company for relocation of a 3-inch gas main in Von Karman Avenue between the San Diego Freeway and Main Street in connection with construction of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, be, and is hereby, approved; and, · FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute ~ said agreement; and, -11- 10/10/84 FURTHER M:>VED: That J?ayment in an amount not to exceed $12,957.00 for said work, be, and is hereby, authorized. DISTRICT 7 Receive and file Staff Report re Electrolurgy, Inc. hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated October 10, 1984, re Electrolurgy, Inc. be, and is Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:48 p.m., October 10, 1984. DISTRICT 2 Authorizing initiation of proceedings re Annexation No. 60 - Townsend Annexation Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-176-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex .60 acres of territory to the District located at 243 South Del Giorgio Road in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 60 -Townsend Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Public Hearing re proposed Annexation No. 41 -Tract No. 9713 Open Public Hearing This being the time and place fixed for public hearing on proposed Annexation No. 41 -Tract No. 9713 to County Sanitation District No. 2, the Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:48 p.m. Receive and file Summary of the Moved, seconded and duly carried: Local Agency Formation Commission's and District No. 2's actions That the Summary of the Local Agency Formation commission's and District No. 2's actions re proposed Annexation No. 41 -Tract No. 9713 to County Sanitation District No. 2 be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Determination of sufficiency of protests to County Sanitation District No. may proceed with consideration of the District. Close Public Hearing DISTRICT 2 Ordering Annexation No. 41 - Tract No. 9713 There being no written nor oral protests received in connection with Annexation No. 41 -Tract No. 9713 2, the Secretary declared that the Board a resolution ordering said annexation to The Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:49 p.m. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-178-2, ordering -12- -. ' "-rl. ·10/10/84 annexation of 2.49 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity easterly of Sycamore Street and northerly of Santiago Creek in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 41 -Tract No. 9713 to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Approving License Agreement with City Centre, A General Partnership re Contract No. 2-14-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-180-2, approving License Agreement with City Centre, A General Partnership, relative to construction of improvements within a portion of the area of the District's easement over the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-14-1. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:50 p.m., October 10, 1984. Secretary, Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 -13- ,·! .. ~ :,c:. I 1-l :: FUND NC IJARRANT NO. 07UH(J 07 C68l li70f.R2 H06A3 070ERlf 0706R~ 07Ctef. 07C687 t'7C6e8 07i16B9 0736~0 07G£191 07::?~9~ 070693 n1oe.q4 070695 G7C696 07(iF,97 (i7fJ698 07(1(,9~ (i7 0 7(l(i 070701 G7il702 070 7C3 C7070lt 070705 07tl706 C:7Cl707 070708 070709 Cl7'l710 r.70711 C70712 070 713 07071" 070715 070716 070717 07071R 070719 010120 070721 07(1722 07072~ 07t'72lt t7G725 ( ~JqQ -JT DIST WCRKIN~ CAF1TAL PPOCESSING DATE 8/30/84 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ·ORANGE COUNTY Vf.NOOR ABC METALS SUP~LYt INC. ADVANCO CCNSTRUCTORSt INC. AIR FRODUCTS & CHEMICALSt JNC. ALLIS•CHALHERS CORP. AMERICAN AIR FILTEPt JNCe AHr.P.ICA~ TECHNICAL SUPFLY ANAHEI~ BUSINESS MACHINES THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. ANGELICA HEALTHCARE SERVICES AQUA BEN CORP. ARCO GLASS & MIRROR A$SOCIATEt LABORATORIES AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. BC INDUSTRIAL SUPFLYt INC. BA~ER EGUIPHENT RFNTALS BENZ ENGl~EERINGt INC. BEV CO eoHAR MAGNETO SERVICE, INC. BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP u.r. BROOKE THE BURKE COMPANY BUTIER ENGl~EERING, INC. C & R RECC~DITIONING CO. err CALJFORNIAt INC. CALIF• ASSOC. OF SAN. AGENCIES CAL SWITCH CARHENITA FORD TRUCK SALESt IN JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS CHEVRON u.s.A •• INC. COMPRESSOR ~ INDUSTRIAL CONROCK CCf.PANY CONSOLICATED ELECTRICAL OIST. CONTINE~TAL CHEMICAL CO COOPER fNERGY SERVICES COSTA MESA AUTO PARTS, INC. CAL CONSOLIDATED MATER DMEt INC. D'VALS SALES COMPANY DAYTON FOLNDRY DECO DELTA ANALYTICAL OIVe DONAHUE & co., INC. DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. DUMAS OIE~El INJECTION DUNN ED~ARDS CORP. EASTMAN, INC. I • CLAIMS PAID 09/05/8lt AMOUNT S3t202e71 Slt324t267e21 S384.32 S91.61 S407.5'4 S18e55 S253.34 i31f9.80 S626.33 S28t869e97 $840.54 S3t255.00 U90.00 $726.47 S15lt.OO U2lt.83 S325e01 S667e25 S7,689.00 S94e92 S69.74 S5t082e00 Slf99.00 s 739. 01 $510. 00 SS9. 74 S176e62 S2t957.~3 S4t 100. 28 $422.50 S617 e2C st t 48 7. 36 Slt998.10 S8lt3e05 S6q3.11 $98.60 S105e17 S36.94 Slt620.98 S369e5l S716e3fl s2,ooo.oo S296e66 u,112.1s S153.66 Slt154elt9 ( DESCRIPTION STEEL STOCK CONTRACTOR P2-25-2 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE MACHINES PIPE SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT CHEHICAL COAGULANTS GLASS LAB ANALYSIS TRUCK PARTS SHALL HARDWARE TOOL RENTAL ENGINE PARTS ELECTRIC CART PARTS ENGINE PARTS ENGR. 7-2C-4 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE SHALL HARDWARE CONSTRUCTION HANAGEHENT P2-23, P2-24 PUHP REPAIRS WORD PROCESSING HAINTENANCE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION WIRE TRUCK PARTS ENGR. P2-25-2 ENGINE OIL COMPRESSOR PARTS BUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CHLORINE ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS RESIN TANK EXCHANGE ENGINE PARTS PI PE SUPPLIES CHAIN ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES, LAB SUPPLIES APPRAISAL SERVICE PW-f 3f REPAIRS ENGINE PARTS PAINT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES :"'. ( Wu ..., . • i ·i ... ' ~ I N == .,! ,,... ·. ( FUND NO WARRANT NO. 070726 (170727 :no 12e 01012c; 370730 l'7~73l 070732 070733 07 0731.! 07073~ C70736 070737 07C738 070739 070740 (170741 070742 070743 n1074t.i G70745 fi70H6 07071.!7 C70748 070749 07075fJ !)7 0751 07C752 070753 (17 6751.! 070755 OH 756 070757 079758 070759 07(1760 OH761 070762 070763 07CJ76" 07(! 765 0707H 070767 070768 07076q 070770 07(:771 ( q1qa -JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/30/84 PAGE Rf PORT NUMBER APl.!3 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR ENCHANTER, I NC. FALCON DISFOSAL SERVICE FEDERAL [~PRESS CORP. FISCHER & PORTER CO. FISHER CO~T~OLS CO. FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. FLOYD-KOROICKt J.y. FORD TRUCK SALVAGE CITY OF FCUNTAIN YALLfY FROST £~Gl~E£RING SERVICES CO. JULIE GARNER GENERAL TELEPHO~E CO. GIERLICH-~ITCHELlt INC. GREAT PACIFIC fQUIPHENT CO. JEAN GRIGG LARRY HALL•S HARRINGTO~ INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS HOUSE OF BATTEP.IES P.S. HUGHES co., INC. ~UNDLEY COMPANY, INC. CITY OF HUNTINGTON erACH HUNTJNGTO~ BEACH PUeBER STAMP HUNTINGTON SUPPLY JRD ~ERCH~NALYSJS INDUSTRIAL PSPHALT l~DUSTRIAL THREADED PP.OOUCTS INGRMt PAFEP. B.P. JOHN HAULING JOSLYN MFGe & SUPPLY CO. 1<.r.c. COf'PANY KELLY PJPE CO. KING BEARING, INC. L.B.w.s •• INC. LA MOTTE CHEMICAL FRODUCTS tt.v. LAWNf'ASTER & CO• INC. LAMSON PRCDUCTSt INC. LERNER PH010t INC. LIGHTING CISTRIBUTORSt INC. LIQUID AIR CORr. THE CHARLES LOWE CO. LYONS INT'l SECURITY, INC. H.J.T. SEA GRANT PROGRAM HARVAC ELECTRONICS MCCOOK PUHF' '-CKESSON C~EMICAL CO. f.CKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORF CLAIMS PAIO 09/05/84 AMOUNT S3t500.00 S53t571)a57 S72.85 S3t336e93 S66e33 S6S.R5 S53t833.95 '636.00 $766.1.!3 S168.71 S5le66 $534.37 S3lt055e88 $993.39 S32e60 S265. Ol'J Sl6fu 75 S307e13 S612e23 s2.s2s.03 S9t173e06 S34.75 S50e75 $165.00 S30.5J $293.96 S2t077e24 Sl1916.48 $159.00 S64t507e27 S693.64 S4t353.98 Sl 1446 .62 s237.22 S1t327.05 S758.57 S17.64 S329.0S S279.80 $179.62 S666e00 s1os.oo S81.61 s9,99s.eo Sl\1923.70 S23.79 DESCRIPTION OCEAN MONITORING SLUDGE HAULING ANO DISPOSAl DELIVERY SERVICE PIPE SUPPLIES, ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES REGULATOR PARTS LAB CHEMICALS CONTRACTOR PW-132 TRUCK PARTS WATER USEAGE VALVES EMPLOYEE MILEAGE TELEPHONE FILTER PRESS BELTS FLOW HETER PARTS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE TRUCK REPAIRS SHAH HARDWARE BATTER I E.S PAINT SUPPLIES, SAFETY SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES SHALL HARDWARE SEMINAR REGISTRATION BUILDING MATERIALS SHALL HARDWARE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES WOOD SHAVINGS TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR 3-2~-1 PIPE SUPPLIES BEARING SUPPLIES WELDING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES TESTING 3-2~-1, PW-123 SHALL HARDWARE FILM PROCESSING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES WELDING SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS PLANT 62 SECURITY PATROL PUBLICATIONS LAB SUPPLIES, ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUHP PARTS LAB CHEMICALS ENGINE PARTS ( ... '. I ;.; !·: ,! ) ::· . ! ) ) 0 • \. ' :·· ::: :J::a I \.J'J ::: . i ·:i. I '1 . -: '9 ~ FUNU NO \.IARRANT NO. 070772 1)70773 070774 07C 775 070776 C70777 070778 07C779 on 780 07G781 07C7e2 0101e3 07 c 78/J 0101es r.707~6 C70787 &70788 0707S9 070790 070791 070 752 070793 Cl707'H 071!795 C70796 070797 076758 IHO 799 070800 070801 1)70802 070803 07 0804 070805 070806 070807 \l7\18uA 07G8C9 070810 07C811 070812 070813 07081'1 G70BlS 070816 070817 ( q1q9 -JT OIST WCRKJNG CArITAL PP.OCESSING DATE 8/30/84 PAGE REFORT NUMBER AP43 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR METRO TOXJCANT PPOG~AH HILLER DRAPERY SERVICE MORRISON CO. HOTOROLAt INC. NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL CITY OF NEWPORT eEACH NOROSON CCRPORATJON· OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORF. OLYMFIC CHEMICAL CO. ONE DAY rAINT & eODY ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO• ORANGE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. OXYGEN SERVICE CO. OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTROLR COUNTY SA~ITATION DISTRICT PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPHCNT CO. PACIFIC BELL PARAMOUNT METAL & SUPPLY INC. FARTS UNLIMJTEO FAS CAL & L.UDW I G PEATo ~AR~JC~. MITCHELL & COo Pf.RFOR,,ANCE SPECIALISTS PEROXJDATION SYSTEMS, INC. POSTMASTER HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE '-IKE PRLICH & SONS PROGRESSIVE STEEL SUPPLY THE REGIS lER THE REGISTER REXNORD ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS RIFULLER SERVICES RYAN-HEPCC S & J CHEVROltT SAN CON INC• SANTA ANA DODGf SANTA A~A ELECTRIC "OTORS SEE OPT JCS SENSOREXo INC. SERPENTJX CONVEYOR CORP. SHAMROCK SUPPLY SHITH•Ef1£RY co. SO. CALIF. COASTAL WATER SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. SOo CALIF. WATEP. CO. SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. s ,. I' CLAIMS PAID 09/05/84 AMOUNT ue.45 S867.08 S377e36 S16t132.11f S90.00 ss1.30 S.514e67 S6o 719.17 S28t661.53 S2R9.98 S26e50 suo.oo $474.78 Sl14e87 S67.340e00 ss,01e.13 S1026 7.53 $440. 74 S2t848e30 s49a.oa S82o930e47 s5,97a.·oo S2o589.02 S3t152.61 s2.ooo.oo SH.OU S24t365e25 $842.75 S283e92 S275.52 S505e97 ssoo.oo $126.41 $128.(,0 S60o948e78 S587.05 S2o853e60 $613.00 Sl00.40 S780.68 s2.21~.69 S128· 00 u.1so.oo S236t996.13 SS.97 us.1~2.29 ( DESCRIPTION INDUSTRIAL WASTE PUBLICATION DRAPERIES PIPE SUPPLIES CONTROL & COHHUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT TRAINING SEHINAR WATER USEAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CAUSTIC SODA CHLORINE TRUCK REPAIRS LAB CHEMICALS FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECTION PI PE SUPPLIES SPECIALTY GASES COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES REIMBURSE WORKERS' COHP. FUND SAFETY SUPPLIES, FIRST AID SUPPLIES TELEMETER I NG PW-115 RETENTION TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR P2-26, PW-123 RETENTION 1983-8~ ANNUAL AUDIT TRUCK REPAIRS HYDROGEN PEROXIDE POSTAGE INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE- CONTRACTOR 3-28R STEEL STOCK CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CONTROL EQUIPMENT PIPE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR l-2R-2,3 TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC HOTOR PARTS SAFETY GLASSES SHALL HARDWARE STEEL STOCK TOOLS, SHALL HARDWARE TESTING P2-26, P2-25-2 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY POWER WATER USEAGE DIESEL FUEL ( ',i I ., !·! "I i :i h , .. , ) .. J • ... ~ ::: :t> I ..t:-::: ;, : ( FUNO NG WARP.ANl NO. C7fl.EllR 070819 t7C.62G 070~21 Cl70B22 0701'23 r7 0 624 070825 070A26 0Bl427 :nc.e2a f'!7t£129 G70830 070831 07GA32 n7oe33 iH 0834 0708~5 (i70836 070837 070A38 07011~~ ')70840 .. , " ( 9Jqq -JT DIST WCRKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE R/30/84 PAGt REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR SPEEDE SPEEOO"ETER DENNIS STEPHENSON SUPER CHEH COPP THE SUPPLIERS J. WAYNE SYLVESTER TAYLOR -ou~N F.M. THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING THOR TEMPORARY SERVICES TR AV[L TU VEL TROPJCA~A APARTMENTS TRUCK & ALTC SUPFLY, INC. J.G. TUCKER & SON, INC. FRANK ULTIMO UNITED PARCEL srRVICE UNITED STATES SAFE DEPOSIT CO VWR SC TENTIFJC VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. VARECt INC. CLAIMS PAID 09105/84 AMOUNT S83ef.2 S15.CJ9 SS52e83 s2.su4.e9 S2t238e91 u.010.13 s3,454.oc; '154.69 S652eOG S595e3A Slt830e65 S857.43 s2,os1.e,. S37e30 se2e.oo S739e67 Sl188S.92 S1. 068. 48 S70.72 DESCRIPTION TRUCK REPAIRS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES, TOOLS PETTY CASH REIHBURSEHENT ELECTRIC CART PARTS AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES TEMPORARY HELP AIR FARE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PW-112 RETENTION DELIVERY SERVICE DISC PACK SERVICE LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 4 WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP WHITEt Fl~[ & YEP.VILLE EVERETT H. YORK CO. S973e55 Slt80le04 $365.70 $609.96 DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY ENGINE PARTS ZIP TEMPORARY PERSONNEL TEMPORARY HELP TOTAL CLAIMS PAID Q9/05/84 S2t259t3BAel2 ---------------------------------- ( !.,; I ' _, • . ::: :.t::- 1 ! , .. \.11 I ::: ! . ,. i.; ! ~ . -, I I: t FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL SUHHARY H1 OPER FUND #1 ACO FUND 82 OPER FUND #2 ACO FUND #3 OPER FUND H3 ACO FUND H3 F/R FUND HS OPER FUND HS ACO FUND #6 OPER FUND H6 ACO FUND H7 OPER FUND fl7 ACO FUND H7 F/R FUND H11 OPER FUND #11 ACO FUND 15&6 OPER FUND 86&7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COHP. INSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND ( I} .. \ PROCESSING DATE 8/30/84 PAGE REPORT NUHbER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ( CLAIMS PAID 09/05/84 AHOUNT $ 602.66 2,340.00 1,079.51 5,459.00 533. us 46,121.75 65,538.67 3,578.43 3,886.oo 32.78 7,221.50 1,596.44 5,926.00 7,689.00 73.18 13' 226. so. 26.20 14.62 529,798.51 1,505,836.31 5,618~ lf 53,789.75 $2,259,388.12 5 . )• ) J -· ( I .. . =: t:C I 1--' =: ( FUND NC\ WARR/INT NO. ~7l•861 liH662 'lnP~3 rJ7(1f.f,lf 07flf!65 IJ71')0f.6 f!lr.f'(, 7 071Jf16El 'H n F\&~ 07"ll7C1 nnn1 07(1872 IJ70AH D7fJ1'74 ~Be75 071'876 l'70B77 ~lU878 07 rJfH9 07!JPM (170881 :>H082 (17!'18E13 0708P(f 07C885 070086 '!7!lee1 1)7!1888 '.J7Q(\{)9 0708~(1 070f.91 01.:892 fJ7!!fl93 07 UA94 n'!895 l'7~SJ96 H0~97 07CP.9R "7 r!8°9 0709t.IO f)7f)~01 07091J2 07&903 no9fJ4 07!'~~5 (17!\91)f, _, t '4. ( Q]9~ -JT OISl WORKING CAPIT/IL PP.OC~SSJNG DATE q/)4/~4 PAGt RFFORT MUMBER h~43 COUNTY SANlT~lJON DISTRICTS OF ORAN~£ COUNTY V£NOOR A-1 INSTITUTIONAL EOUIP• Co. A. M. F. VOIT AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALStlNC. All-STATE VEHICLES, INC. ALLIS-CHALHfRS COPP. AMEPICAN COMPRESSO~ PAPTS A~FRJCAN OISTRICT TfLE,R£Pt: A~~TEKt INC. ANA~EIH SEWER CONSTPUCll~N THF ANCHOR PACKING CO. AQUA B[N COPP. ARCO GLASS & HiqROP ARROW-RISCOt INC. PANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. ~&~ TRUCKS eAKER DLYWOOD co., INC. 0A~CROFT-WHITNEY CO. PECKMA~ INOUSTRJAL BECKMAN INPUSTRJAL L.W. BEMIS TRACTO~ & IMPL~~ENT BEYCO BIERLY & ASSOClATESt l~C. SIG BOM RENTAL CO. BOB•S RADIATOR P.RISTOL PARK MEDICAL G~P., INC TH£ BURKE COMPANY CPT CALIFO~NIAt I~C• CAL-PARTITIONS, INC. CARCO, INC. CARLSOff MACHINE CO. CHAPLES We CARTfR CO. CHESTERTON LOS ANGELES CONNELL CHEVROLET CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. CONSOLIDATED REPRODUCTIONS CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO CONTINENTAL RADIATO~ COOPER ENERGY SF.RVICES CLAI~S PAID 09/1~/84 AMOUNT Slt~4le63 Utl64.n H?9 •. ~? \},498.10 $4.12·1.r;:;i s1.~44.H1 $114.•)0 n.211.u" S2t6!l'l;.00 :.A~9.26 S23•624.57 $63.&0 S39.53 S28t°'65.50 S2t65~·'lC ,930.32 S65 • 7lf Slt21~.51 $1, 166. 00 S9'h64 st •259•25 S55'l •'JO Slt'345.~IJ Sl:>!>i84 $78.')tJ UIS.Se $163.20 st0.465.913 Ut337.5F $3+672•~0 $17. 'J7 s21.s1 S:?fi.34 S2t967.J? Sl e'l79e 78 S3t381elt~ OfSCPJPTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT SPECIALTY GASES VEHICLE tEASE PUMP PARTS COMPRESSOR PARTS ALARM SYSTEM MAINTENANCE HEAT EXCHANGER CSDOC H7 MANHOLE REPAIRS ENGINE PARTS CHEMICAL COAGULANTS GLASS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS TRUCK PARTS LUMBER PUBLICATION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC CART PARTS WORKERS! COMP. ADMINISTRATOR TRASH DISPOSAL TRUCK REPAIRS PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMS ENGINE PARTS WORD PROCESSING MAINTENANCE OFFICE PARTITIONS TRUCK PARTS CHAIN PIPE SUPPLIES FREIGHT TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION CHLORINE TRUCK REPAIRS ENGINE PARTS TRUCK PARTS ( J . COSTA ~ESA AUTO PARTSt INC. CAL CONSOLIDATED WATEP STATE OF CALIFORNIA S2tl8.RC "S913.6t $389•01) $251.05 '160.0fJ it~!). !){I $16!!. JG Slf•rn. no Sl~~. 'Ht WATER SOFTENER RENTAL, RESIN TANK EXCHANGE ANNEXATION #2-19 PROCESSING FEE STAT£ OF CALIFORNI~ ANNEXATION 12-25 PROCESSING FEE STAT[ OF CALIFORNIA ANNEXATION 62-29 PROCESSING FEE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNEXATION 62-59 PROCESSING FEE STATE OF CAlJFOPNIA ANNEXATION #2-36 PROCESSING FEE DAILY PILOT StR.2('1 LEGAL ADVERTISING I.· I 1' • .. · I. ! 1, f I I'• I ·, ) ) ) •• FUND NO ~199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING OATE ''l~/Rq PAG£. REPORT NUMOER AP43 2 COUNTY SANITATIO~ DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ·.1 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 1"· ,. i 1;! t. .-1 P10907 07091)8 070~1)9 !l7091C 01oq11 HC912 (?70913 070914 Clr.915 r'l7ll'?16 07~917 noCJ1e 1)70919 !)7 fl920 07C92l 070922 ::: ('70923 to 01oq24 .. NI 070925 .._ ~H926 ..,. !Ht'927 i'· i· ~; l "' , ... : I. I, b . ! L.· !. I, 1:1•, '.) ! .' I I. !'i·i I I 1r;; ! I•, i, I I I •• C70928 07'1929 "070930 07~«?31 070932 !!7~93~ tl7 093'f 070935 '!7(.l936 07(1937 !)70938 t'7093'.?' 070940 1)70941 C7C'342 07?91l3 07C94lf 'l7('1c:r45 1)709'46 1'7('947 OHC?48 070949 ~7095~ ~70951 '17(1952 ( D'VALS SAlf.S COMPANY MICHAEL R. OEBLIFUX DECO OEL~HI SYSTEMS, INC. OIGIDYNE COMFUTER SERVIC[S DOLLINGER CORP• DOPAOO ENTERPRISESt INC. DUNN EDWARDS CORP. EIMCO PROCF.SS FQUI~• co; EASTMANt INC. EBER~ARO EQUIPMENT ELECTRONIC·~ALANCJNG COi FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. FISCHER g PORTFR ·co. FISHER SCIENTIFIC co. FLO-SYSTEMS FRANCE COMPRESSOR· PRODUCT-···--· ···· EDWARD R. FRANCIS FROST ENGINEERING SERVICES CO• FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY;· tNC; CITY OF FULLERTON GANAHL LUMBER CO. ····JULIE GARNER · -· · ·· GENERAL TELEPHONE co. H.e. NURSERY ~ACH COMPANY LARRY HALL'S HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS MICH~EL HEINZ w.c. HENDRIE & COet INC. HONEY\IELLt INC. HUNTINGTON VALLEY TOOL HYDROTEX ISCO COMPANY JMP~RIAL WEST CHEMICAL CO• INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IRVINE INDUSTRIAL LANDSCAPE IRVINE-RANC~ WATER DISTRICT JOHNSTON PUMP CO. K.r..c. COMPANY ~AS SAFETY PRODUCTS KELLY PIPE CO. KING BEARINGt INC. L g N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO L.e.'1.s •• INC. ;! ._, ' . .,. CLAT"S PAID 09/19!A4 AMOUNT S30.JR S6't •. 28 st; 771 • ~o S225.fJO st. ·)~6. 1)8 s1 ;a!169f.6 S7t33!Je:.?8 S778e78 $ t; 844. 4"f) $823e60 S5lf • 76 Slf 2• ~o· ·· ·· ·· · Sl2t652el9 S24 • ~O S327•56 S33.10 S303el6 · S6t6~4i l9 Sl79e67 S591le 17 S3t'e 00 s 175. 91 S889e42 -----· · -·--·s1a.a9·-· S7t476e76 S2t650.0U S.36:5io77 S2(1le40 S4Je65 S36 9-90 --- $2. 596. 6lf $53.IJ3 Slf!ii6!S s3,495.53 n .ua.f:\3 Sllt722•'t7 S3LJt782e40 $744.61 S4e30 ssn.se s39,q99.2e S38ill S2~9.74 S4t747e22 'i4t794•40 U21l.q2 ( · OEC5CP.IPTION PIPE SUPPLIES CONFERENCE EXPENSES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES COMPUTER PROGRAHHING MINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE COMPRESSOR PARTS SCRUBBER REPAIRS, PLANT #1 ENTRANCE GATE REPAIRS PAINT SUPPLIES -· PIPE SUPPLIES OFF I CE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS SCROLL BALANCING SLUDGE HAULING AND DISPOSAL FREIGHT PI PE SUPPLIES · LAB HANUAL PUMP PARTS COHPRE·SSOR PARTS·· -----·-·· - TRAVEL EXPENSES VALVES LAB ANALYSIS WATER USEAGE LUHBER --EMPtOYEE MILEAGE TELEPHONE LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES TRUCK REPAIRS SHALL HARDWARE EMPLOYEE ·HILEAGE GEAR PARTS STRIP CHARTS TOOLS ENGINE OIL LAB SUPPLIES FERRIC CHLORIDE COMPUTER SYSTEM PLANT MAINTENANCE WATER USEAGE BEARING SUPPLIES CSDOC 65 EMERGENCY REPAIRS SAFETY SUPPLIES PI PE SUPPLIES BEARING SUPPLIES UNIFORM RENTAL WELD I NG SUPPLIES • .. fl '~! ( ··1 'i ; ; )r 'I '., : '! 1· l n ., . r I ,·:1 , i ' ~ '·: I , I . ! ;.:1 ;··' I I I 1 i,.: !: ·i .. ! .i I I "' iJ !' ~· . ! .,1 I ~ -• I =: t::x:f I i\N .. :: : l1·1; :,.1 ~ It: ( FUND NO YARRANT llJO. 070953 '.?7G95lt 07!'~55 Q7C'?56 070957 07~9!:8 070959 07096(1 070961 IJ7C9i:-2 07tlC?63 071)964 07!>965 070966 'J7~9&7 (114)968 ~70969 1)71)970 1)71)971 070972 (.17 0 ~73 C7 0974 ~7l''H5 no976 071)977 07~978 07?979 1)709RD 070981 070982 070983 07 0 984 '1709£'5 Q70c;1R6 G70987 01~c;iee 07(1989 071)991 !)71)~91 {l7 (\ 992 On!~93 '17 C994 07'1995 1)7!'9% !)71)997 070998 • I ~ ( . .. .. . 9199 -JT OJST WORKING CAPITAL PP.OCE$~ING OATf 9/llf/8~ PAGE ~f PORT NUM~ER APlf 3 COUNTY SANITATION DJSTP.ICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS LA UNOR Y HQOD LAURSEN COLO~ LAB H.v. L~WNMASTER g COt JNC. LEUPOLD & STEVENS LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. LIGHTING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. LILLY TYPESETTING LOS ANGELES TI~ES LYON~ INT'L SECURITY, INC. MAP.TIN LUT~ER HOSPITAL HCCROHETER CORP MCKESSON CHEMICAL co. HILLER DRAPERY SERVICE MINE SAFETY APfLIANCES CO• PAUL A. MITCHELL HONTGOHERY ELEV~TOR COMPANY Je ARTHUR HOOREt CAt INC• E.B. "ORITZ FOUNDRY HYEPS TIRE SUPPLY CLAIMS PAID ~9/19/0lf A"OUNT $150.80 SlStJ.68 Slf36i'13 St.194.30 $21~·61 S3fl6e56 S849.14 $763.21) $37!h88 !38Re51J S5t59ile!l5 $1!)1. !i6 Ut3.,.2 S37el0 ,5.39 \36.49 S328.4B $l3'h49 s2.•23.t6 DES CR JPT IO~J LAB CHEMICALS USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT FILM PROCESSING TESTING P2-26, P2-25-2 CABLE ELECTRIC CART PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TYPESETTING CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING PLANT 12 SECURITY PATROL USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT ENGINE REPAIRS LAB CHEMICALS DRAPERIES PUMP PARTS EHPLOY·EE HI LEAGE PLANT 12 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES MANHOLE RING & COVERS TRUCK Tl RES :! NATEL & CO• NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENcrs NATIONAL LUHerR SUPPLY NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL OCCIDENTAL CHEMIC~l CORP. OLYMPIC CHE~ICAL CO. S184 .54 S2t125•0P s2·1. 95 f.568.10 S3?0•00·- S17t935.90 S1t.454e06 COHHUNICATION SYSTEM CONSULTING PUBLICATIONS O~E DAY P-INT & BODY ORANGE COAST FORD TRACTOR ORA~GE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY co. Ol<YGEN SERVICE COUNTY OF ORANGE roUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PACIFIC MOBILE OFFICES PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMFNT co. PA~ TS UNLIMITED PEAT, HARWICK, HITC~ELL & CO• PEAOVIOATION SYSTEMS, INC. PR£NTICE-HALLt INC. HAROLD PRIHROS£ JCE RAFFfRTY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS RAINBOW DISFOSAL CO. RAND COMPUTER CENTER RE-CY-~LErN CORP. THE REGISH:R THE REGISTER RICOH CORP .. S?.3lJi:?2··- Sl66. 34 u,Js1.2e S°36• 71 S'4~J5. 79 $532.00 UH•M \211.CJR S71 ~.28 se.&ss.oo u.11s.eo $9£.J. 5• $1•)1).!)0 ss 1. 76 S.~34 • 09 SA~9.e6 $183.68 sr,1s.!l' '$1\f\7.13 SUS.68 SHALL HARDWARE SAFETY SEMINAR CAUSTIC SODA CHLORINE · .. TRUCK REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES SPECIAlTV OASES LAB ANALYSIS REIMBURSE WORKERS' COHP. FUND TRAILER RENTAL SAFETY SUPPL I ES TRUCK PARTS 1983-84 ANNUAL AUDIT HYDROGEN PEROXIDE PUBLICATIONS INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAHPLINO ICE TRUCK PARTS TRASH DISPSOAL COMPUTER SERVICES-DISTRICT 16 ENGINE PARTS GLASSIFIED ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING COPIER RENTAL ( :1 ' , . I I:. i·! i: :. ··1 " j ... , !'; .) ,.; I '·· 't,, , . • t! : ' l:i 1::; 1.: '·'' 'I :1; ,,: ''i i.:; 1:.j I I·•· ) ') .) I··· I ) ·: .• l!I :·1 . :: tt.f I ·..i::- .. I ::: :·. I I : ~ i: I i. i·! ... ' ~: FUND Nci 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROC($$ING OATE 9114/R4 PAG( R~PORT NU~OE~ AP~3 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OR~NGE COUNTY WARRANT NO. VENDOR 07Q~99 (!71 O'JO 071C01 07I~')2 !>71 ':.'1)3 C7 l'.l04 07101)5 (17 J 006 071'J07 0710::!8 0710(19 07Hl0 (17Jn11 071012 071£'13 071014 1)71(115 07H16 1]7 tr.17 011r.1e 071019 !)71020 'J71 !12] 071022 07H23 071:>24 (17UJ25 fl7 l 026 !171027 !)71028 071C29 C71033 !.'71031 nic32 fH 1033 t'71t'34 071035 tl71 U36 OHIJ37 071 03R 071!.'39 ROAEPTSHAV CONTROLS CO. ROCCO'S TRUCK MRtCKING RY II~ •HERCO SAtJTA llNA DOOGr SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS YVONNE SCH\IA0 SENSORf)(, l~C. SliAMROCK SUPPLY SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY• INC SOUTHE~N CALIF. EDISON CO. SO. CAL. GAS CO. SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO• SPACE SPRING & ST~MPING CO. STAINLr.ss PlrE ~ FITTING co. THf SU PPL IE RS TAK TAK~MINE TECHSONICS THOMPSON LACQUER COi THREE H CO• CH ANNON C • Tl A TIHE CLOCK SALES & SERVICE TOMARCO TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLYt INC• UNION OIL CO. QF CALIF. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE VWP SC TENT IF IC VALLfY CITIES SUPPLY CO. VALVr. ~STEEL SUPPLY CO. V"NIER GRAPHICS VARECt INC. P.ICHARO V. VON LANGEN LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES• IMC• JOHN R. WAF'LES WEMCO PUMPS WESTERN WIRE & ALLOYS WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COPF VITEG SCIENTIFIC THOMAS Lt WOOORUFFt INCe XEROX CORP. Zl~ TEMPORARY PERSONNrL CLAIMS PAID 09/1'/~4 AMOUNT S254e8~ S7'J4e90 $26?.13 SH.53 Slt'J94e23 Sl't e 35 S255.69 si,ttft3.21 $111.56 SlOS,759.81 s2.q99.1a Sl3tli69e38 · S23f,. 53 Sl65. 42 Sli2'l7.!)0 S1 •~fl•J.OO S702e69 U:.l6•!JO $lt;O. G5 S2.5.5R U01• 12 SH6.:J1 St;l. 79 S2i39R•71 · UtB.07 S2 8. J 2 st t9,4•29 $406.96 SIAS.SO Sa\94.10 S9e924.B2 $53~.20 S3t429e39 S332e40 S9il3.i>O Sltlll·Sl S19443.80 Sl13.85 $12,950.35 '412.80 Slf36•qA TOTAL CLAIMS rATO oq/19/~4 S483•6S7.F!l ---------------------------------- ( f! •. .. ,, ( • DESCRJPTJON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC MOTORS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TOOLS PIPE SUPPLIES POWER NAJURAL GAS DIESEL FUEL PIPE SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES SAFETY·SUPPLIES, TOOLS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTROL EQUIPMENT -PAINT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE MILEAGE TIME CLOCK REPAIRS TOOLS LOCK REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS GASOLINE DELI VERY SERVI CE LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES, TOOLS VALVES PRINTED FORMS STEEL STOCK CONFERENCE EXPENSES CONTRACT ADMINSTRATION P2•2)•6 ODOR CONSULTING IMPELLER PARTS WELDING SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LAB REPAIRS LEGAL SERVICES XEROX REPRODUCTION TEMPORARY HELP " .. ~ .,, ( '! )r ,··: i i. I i '··' i •,j .·, ·I :,, I i·•I "I \ . .•' .) : .• .. • ,., '" ! .. ; i ~ '; ; I :: 'to I V1 r: ' : ,· i ,. j. r:1 i I i ~ . ! ; .. ~ :: ( + -.... FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL SUHHARY 61 OPER FUND 63 OPER FUND 15 OPER FUND f/5 ACO FUND 16 OPER FUND #7 OPER FUND #7 F/R FUND 111 OPER FUND 113 ACO FUND #3&9 OPER FUND 65&6 OPER FUND 66&7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COHP. INSURANCE FUND JT ~OkklNt CAPltAL tO~b " ( '• <l ... . . ( PROCESStNG DATE 9/11f/8lt PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIHS PAID 09/19/84 AHOUNT $ 9,206.lf8 9, t91f.j2 41,028.57 11 • 3 .. 855. '" 6,525.19 265.6lt li,813.29 34.oo 2,423.16 1,020.so· lt6.65 253,379.63 .... 86,H1.36 11o.50 1,082.00 ··~1.21lf.04 TOTAL CLAIMS.PAID 09/19/84-..... -· --· ·· ............. --·-.. .... · -·-·· --$lf8) I 66 7 I 81 5 '.1 •·I i )r I .. ,'I i-; I ! ''1 ;::; i''.! i"l i !·'·· .. r: .. " I .. , j '·' ~: : i I •) • EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA An adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation ~District No. 1 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 2:00 p.m., f-OCtober 3, 1984, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. !The Secretary pro tern called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary pro tern reported a quorum was not present. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT l Adjournment of meeting by Secretary pro tern This 3rd day of October at 2:00 p.m., being the time and place for the Adjourned Regular Meeting of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum of said Board present, the meeting of District No. 1 was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary pro tern to 3:00 p.m., Thursday, October 4, 1984, for a second reading of proposed Ordinances Nos. 105 and 106. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, WILLIAM H. BUTLER, Secretary pro tern of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of minute entries of the meeting of said Board of Directors on the 3rd day of October, 1984. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of October, 1984. Secretary pro'tem of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California MEETING DATE October 31 1984 TIME 2 :00 p.m.0ISTRICTS l ~~~~~~-----------------------------------------------------0 I STR l CT 1 ~o J}{ ~~ f fl.EJRtJr JO l NT BOARDS !CRANK),,,,,,,,HANSON,,,,,, ____ LUXEMBOURGER),GRISET,,,,,, ____ KENNEDY),,,,,,SALTARELLI •• ____ (WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ____ DISTRICT 2 !MURPHY) I. I I I I .WEDAA •• I. I.·-OVERHO T),,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,, ___ NEWTON~.,,,,,,BUCK,,,,,,,, ____ ____ (NORBY)t•••••••CATLIN,,,,,, ____ _____ (NELSONJ,,, •• ,.cooPER •••••• ____ ---- I LUXEMBOURGERJ.GRISET •••••• ____ ____ MAHON~Y),,,,,,HOLMBERG,,,, ____ ____ ODLUM ,,,,,,,,KAWANAMI,,,, ____ ____ ADLER ,,,,,,,,NEAL1•••••••----____ ____ CULVER),,,,,,,PERRY,,,,,,, ________ ____ (BEYER),,,,,,,,SMITH,,,,,,, ________ ~ (WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ________ ____ DISTRICT 3 OVERHOlT),,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,, ________ ____ COOPER ,,,,,,,NELSON,,,,,, ________ ____ RISNER ,,,,,,,BROWNELL••••----____ ____ NORBY),,,,,,,,CATLIN11••••----____ ____ PERRY),,,,,,,,CULVER,,,,,, ________ ____ SE I DEL.J ••••• I I FRESE ••• I •• ·---------· DAVIS),,,,,,,.GRIFFIN,,,,, ____ LUXEMBOURGERJ,GRISET,,,,,, ____ MAHONEY),,,,,,HOLMBERG,,,, ________ ____ . (ADLER),,,t••••NEAL1•••••••----____ ___ (FI NL"AYSON} OLSON •• I I •• ·--- !MULLEN) ••••••• PART IN •••••• ________ ____ WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ________ ____ LANDER),,,,,,,SYLVIA,,,,,, ________ ____ MANDIC),,,,,,,THOMAS,,,,,, ________ ____ (SIRIANI),,,,,,WEISHAUPT.,, ________ ____ DISTRICT 5 (MAURER),,·,,,,,HART,,,,,,,, _____ ____ (HEATHER),,,,,,PLUMMER,,,,, ________ ____ (WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ________ ____ DISTRICT 6 (SMITH) .• I I I I I •• WAHNER. I I. I·-_;__ (MAURER),,.,,,,HART,,,,,,,, ____ ____ (WlEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ____ ____ DISTRICT 7 lBEYER),,,,,, •• SMITH11•••••-____ ____ MAURER),,,,,,,HART,,,,,,,, ________ ____ KENNEDY),,,,t,EDGAR,,,,,,, ________ _ LUXEMBOURGERJ,GRISET,,,,,, _______ ___ !MILLER) I I I I I I .SILLS •• I •• I·----WIEDER),, ••••• STANTON ••••• ________ ____ GREEN),,,,,,,,WAHNER,,,,,, _______ ____ DISTRICT 11 ! MAND 1 c) •• I I • I I BA I LE y I I I I I • ---- MAND IC) ••••• ,,PATTINSON,,, __________ __ WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ____ 9/13/84 (MAND IC) I. I I ••• BAILEY I I. I.·- !RISNER> ••••••• BROWNELL •••• ____ NEWTON),,,,,,,BUCK,,,,,,,, NORBY)t••••••1CATLIN,,,,,,----(NELSO~J,,,,,,,COOPER,,,,,,:::: (PERRY1,,,,,,,,CULVER,,,,,, (KENNEDY),,,,,,EDGAR.,,,,,,-------- l SEIDE~),, ,,,,,FRESE,,,,,,.::::::::: DAVIS),,,,,, ,GRIFFIN,,,,,_ LUXEMBOURGER),GRISET,,,,,, ___ :::: CRANK),,,,,,,,HANSON,,,,,, ____ ____ MAURERJ,,,,,,,HART,,,,,,,, ____ ____ MAHON~YJ,,,,,,HOLMBERG,,,, ____ ____ ODLUM ••••••11KAWANAMI,,,. ____ ____ ADLER t••••••1NEAL111•••••----____ COOPERJ,,,,,,,NELSON,,,,,, ___ ____ FINLAYSONJ,,,,OLSON,,,,,,, ____ ____ (MULLEN),,,,,,,PARTJN,,,,,, ____ ____ (MANDIC),,,,,,,PATTINSON,,, ____ ____ (CULVER)t••••••PERRY,,,,,,, __ __ (HEATHERJ,,,,,,PLUMMER,,,,, ____ ::::: OVERHOLJJ,,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,, ____ ____ KENNEDY),,,, •• SALTARELLI,, ____ ____ MILLER),,,,.,,SlLLS,,,, •• , ____ ____ BEYER)l,,,,,,,SMITH,11 ,,,, ____ ____ WIEDER ,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ____ ____ LANDER ,,,,,,,SYLVIA,,,,,, _____ lMANDIC ••••t••THOMAS,,,,,, ____ ____ ~GREEN/SMITHJ,,WAHNER,,,,,, ____ ____ (MURPHY) t I I • I • I WEDAA I • I •.• I ·--(SIR I AN I J 111111 WE I SHAUPi ••• ____ ____ SI8EE.: OTHERS: SYLVESTER,,, ____ ____ CLARKE,,,,,, ____ _____ DAWES,,,,,,, ____ ____ ANDERSON,,,,___,..... ____ BUTLER,,,,,,~ ____ BROWN,·,,,,,, _____ BAKER,,,,,,, ____ ____ KYLE,,,,,,,, ____ ____ YOUNG,,,,,,, ___ ___ VON LANGEN ____ ____ WINSOR,,,,,, _____ STREED,,,,,, ____ _ WOODRUFF,,,, ____ ____ ATKINS,,,,,, ____ ____ HOHENER,,,,, ____ ____ HOWARD,,,,,, ____ ____ HUNT,,,,,,,, ____ ____ KEITH,,,,,,, ____ ____ KNOPF,,,,,,, ______ __ LE BLANC,,,, _____ LINDSTROM,,, ____ ____ LYNCH,,,,,,, ____ ____ MARTINSON,,, ____ ____ PEARCE,,,,,, ___ ____ f COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE CEUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAYJ September 27, 1984 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED MEETING DISTRICT NO. 1 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1984 -2: oo P. rt 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Pursuant to adjournment of the adjourned regular meeting of September 26, 1984, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 will meet in an adjourned meeting at the above hour and date. TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTA IN VALLEY. CALI FORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTA IN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 September 27, 1984 MANAGER'S REPORT ADJOUR.."IBD REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1984 -2:00 P.M. (7141 540-29 10 17 141962-2411 During the 1984-85 budget deliberations in June and July the Boards reviewed the Districts' five-year cash flow projections which forecast that the District will experience a cash shortfall over the next five years of $17.6 million. This is primarily a result of escalating costs of providing sewerage services because of the higher levels of treatment required by the Federal and State regulatory agencies to comply with the Federal Clean Water Act and the State of California Ocean Plan. In the event the Districts do not receive the ocean waiver, the financial situation will deteriorate further. In the discussions it was pointed out that during the 1983-84-85 fiscal years District No. 1 would have to dip into reserves for a total of $3.3 million to pay the increased costs of operating and maintaining the new advanced treatment facilities constructed to comply with the laws, and that it would be necessary to consider instituting a system of fees for users to pay for their sewerage services. The Directors then directed staff to study alternatives for meeting the District's long-range financial needs and report back to the Board. At the adjourned meeting on September 26th staff reviewed alternative methods of financing the District's fiscal requirements over the next several years. Staff also reviewed updated cash flows reflecting the anticipated ~, financial position if needed alternative revenue sources are implemented to / I finance the sewage collection, treatment and disposal activities. Based upon the staff presentation and a rather lengthy discussion by the Directors, the Board concluded that immediate implementation of a financial program establishing a schedule of one-time connection fees for new development to pay for facilities expansion, and an annual user fee to pay for operation and maintenance costs including rehabilitation and replacement of facilities, is necessary to maintain the fiscal integrity of the District. Accordingly, the Board initiated proceedings to adopt such a program and adjourned the meeting to Wednesday, October 3rd at 2:00 p.m. to consider approval of connection/user fe~ ordinances. Enclosed with the agenda mate r i al are copies of proposed ordinance No. 105 fixing the connection fee f o r new de velopment to pay for c osts of facilities to serve that development, and Ordinance No. 106 establ ishing an annual user fee to pay for ongo i ng operating and maintenance costs including facili t ies rehabilitation and replacement. The proposed f ees are summarized as follows: Single-Family Multi-Family Commercial Effective Fee Type Residential Residential Ind/Govmntl Date One -time Connection $500/Dwelling $500/Dwelling $100 /1,000 1/01 /85 Fee Unit Unit Square Feet Annual User Fee $60.00 $36.00 $42.95/1,000 7/01 /85 Square Feet Also appearing on the agenda is an item authorizing the staff to contract with the County to proceed with planning for implementation of the user fee to be collected on the property tax bill. This is the same method utilized by Districts Nos. 5 and 6 for collection of their annua l use fee and is the most cost effective method of collection. r -2- r, ( ' I ~ ...... 1• . :;; --... "". ' ~· BOARDS OF DIRECTORS II . -....,,I County Sanitation Districts Pest· Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: of· Orange County, Califomi1 DISTRICT No. 1 ADJOURNED. -REGULAR .MEETING WEDNESDAY .. OCTOBER 3., 1984. -2:00 P·.·M. (1) Roll call Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA (2) Ag;>ointment of Chairman pro ten, if necessary (3) Consideration of actions relative to: (a} Ordinance No. 105, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Amending Ordinance No. 104, Establishing Sewer Ca'mecticn Charges for·use of District sewerage Facilities (b) Ordinance No. 106, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges (1) Report of General Counsel re proposed ordinances (2) Consideration of roll call on following rotions:· (a) To read. Ordinance No. ios, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Amending Ordinance No. 104, Establishing Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, by title only, and waive reading of ordinance in full (must be adopted by unanitoous vote of Directors present) • . (b) To adopt Ordinance No. 105, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Amending Ordinance No. 104, Establishing. Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities (c) To read Ordinance No. 106, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of county Sanitation District No. 1, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, by title only and waive reading of ordinance in full (must be adopted by unaninnm , vote of Directors present). · (d) To adopt Ordinance No. 106, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Establishing· Sanitary Sewer Service Charges ·..._; continued fran Page 1 (4) Consideration of notion authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement with the Orange County Assessor's Office for canputer programning and EDP processing to provide data base information, mailing labels and· parcel charge tapes relative to planning and implementation of user fees to be collected on the property tax bill, fo~ an annmt not to exceed $75,000 (5) Ccmsideration of notion directing staff to sul:mit standard agreements for collectim of Districts' oonnection fees to the cities of Santa Ana and Tustin and the Costa Mesa Sanitary Distric~ requesting approval (6) Other business and cxmmmications, if any (7) Consideration of m::>tion to adjourn ,. I ORDINANCE NO. 105 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 104 ESTABLISHING SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Section 702 of Ordinance No. 104 is hereby amended to read: 702 DISTRICT NO. 1 CONNECTION CHARGES 1. District Connection Charges No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which established the use of said property. The following District connection charges are hereby established commencing January 1, 1985, and shall be paid to the District or to an agent designated by the District: (a) Connection Charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: r For each new dwelling unit constructed, the -1- connection charge shall be $500 per dwelling unit. (b) Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling building, the connection charge shall be $500 per dwelling unit. (c) Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwell i ng buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $100 per 1,000 square fe~t of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $500. (d) Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (A) and (C) abov e. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destr u ction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the -2- r equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new \ construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. (e) Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of f amiiy dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $500 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $100 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional fixture units. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be effective thirty days after adoption. Section 3. The Secretary of the Board is directed to certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the County. r PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, at a regular adjourned meeting held October 3, 1984. -3- ' Chairman of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California Secretary of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California -4- r ' . ORDINANCE NO. 106 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1: Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to · establish a system of sanitary sewer service charges required to be paid by property owners for the services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with its sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the sewage collection facilities and wastewater treatment and disposal facilities o~ the District, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 2: Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Cha.rge. Commencing July 1, 1985, each parcel of real property located within the District wlfich is improved with structures designed for residen- tial, commercial or industrial use and connected to the District's system, shall pay a sanitary sewer service charge based on the average volume of wastewater discharged by a class of users in the sum or sums as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance. ,. Section 3: Application of Ordinance. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be in addition to Ordinance No. 104 and 105 of -1- the District establishing regulations for use of District's sewage facilities, including provisions for payment of charges or fees related thereto. Section 4: Exceptions. Except as expressly provided in Section 5 hereof, the provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all properties in the District, and no exception shall be provided for properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax exempt organizations. Section 5: Exemptions and Appeals. In recognition that certain legal parcels of rear property exist within the District which are not connected to the District system and that other properties acquire considerably greater potable water than is ultimately discharged to the District's system, it is the intent of the District that said parcels be exempt totally or in part from the payment of charges as prescribed herein. Any property owner may appeal the assessment of the charges and submit a claim for rebate to the District on the forms prescribed and provided by the District, within ~ne hundred twenty (120) days after the annual bill is mailed. All applica- tions for rebate of the annual sewer service charge will be petermined by the General Manager of the District, who may grant a partial or fulI rebate or adjustment of the charge based on receiving satisfactory proof that an inequity exists between the r amount and the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's' systems. Such inequities may include, but are not limited to the -2- . . following instances : a) the use of the parcel differs from the use indicated by the charge; b) no service connection to the District system exists from the parcel charged; c) the principal water use is agricultural d) any other use wherein the . amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of property in question. Section 6: Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year. The sanitary· sewer service charge established by this Ordinance shall be for the fiscal year commencing July 1 and terminating June 30, and there shall be no proration of such charges. Section 7: Credit for Industrial Permittees: A credit shall be allowed to all dischargers permitted pursuant to Article 3 of Ordinance No. 104 in an amount equal to the annual sanitary sewer service charge established by Section 2 of this Ordinance. Said credit shall be made in the same manner as credit is allowed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Section 302.6, 303.6 and 304.S(B) (4) of Ordinance No. 104. Section 8: Severabiiity. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstance is heid invalid by order of court , the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected. -3- r Section 9: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall become effective thirty days after its adoption. Section 10: The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd day of October, 1984. Chairman ATTEST: Secretary I' -4- Class of User Single-Family Dwellings Multi-Family Dwellings/Mobile Hanes Corrmercial/ Industrial/Other (government buildings, utilities, non-prof it organizations, etc.) Basis of Change Charge per dwelling unit Charge per dwelling unit Charge per 1000 square feet of building TABLE A 1985-86 Annual Rate $ 60.00 36.00 42.95 Minimum Annual Charge per Unit $ 60.00 36.00 42 .95 . ...._,, MEETING DATE October #. 1984 TIME );00 p.m.01sTRICTS __ 1 _______ _ DISTRICT 1 ~ ~ JOINT BOARDS ! CRANK),,,,,,,,HANSON,,,,,,_L.,-_:t__ _:i__ (MANDIC),,,,,,,BAILEY,,,,,, ____ LUXEMBOURGER),GRISET,,,,,,±'V""± _::J__ !RISNER),,,,,,,BROWNELL,,., __ KENNEDY),,,,,,SALTARELLI,, -.::/-.. NEWTON),,,,,,,BUCK,,,,,,,, ____ WlEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ____ NORBY),,,,,,,,CATLIN,,,,,, ____ DISTRICT 2 (NELSO~) ••••••• cooPER •••••• ___ MURPHV),,,,,,,WEDAA,,,,,,, ________ ____ OVERHO~TJ,,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,, ________ ____ NEWTON)),,,,,,,BUCK,,,,,,,, ________ ____ NORBY ,,,,,,,,CATLIN,,,,,, ________ ____ NELSONJ ••••• ,.cooPER •••••• ____ ------LUXEMBOURGERJ,GRISET •••••• ________ ____ MAHON~Y),,,,,.HOLMBERG.,,,~ ____ ____ ODLUM ••••••11KAWANAMJ,,., ________ ____ ADLER t•••••••NEAL••••••••----____ ____ CULVERJ,,,.,,,PERRY,,,,,,, ________ ____ BEYER)~··•••••SMITH,,,,.,, ________ ____ WIEDERJ,,,,,,,STANTON,.,,, _________ ____ DISTRICT 3 OVERHOlT),,,,,ROTH.,,,,,,, ________ ___ COOPER ,,,,,,,NELSON,,,,,, ________ ____ RISNER ,,,,,,,BROWNELL,,,, ________ ____ NORBY) •• ,,,,,,CATLJN,,,,,, ________ ____ PERRY),,,,,,,,CULVER,.,,,, ________ ____ (SEIDELJ,,,,,,,FRESE,,,,.,,___,.. ____ ____ DAVIS),,,,,,,,GRIFFIN,,,,,-l:::'.:-____ ____ LUXEMBOURGERJ,GRISET,,,,., ________ ____ MAHONEY),,.,,,HOLMBERG,,., ____ ~ ____ ADLER-> ••• ' •••• NEAL ••• I I I I·------------FINLAYSON> OLSON,,,,,,, ________ ____ MULLENi,,,,,,,PARTIN,,,,,, _______ ____ WIEDER .,,,,,,STANTON,,,., ________ ____ LANDER ,,,,.,,SYLVIA,,,,,, ________ ____ MANDIC t••••11THOMAS,,,,,, ________ ____ (SIRIANIJ,,,,,,WEISHAUPT,,, ________ ____ DISTRICT 5 !MAURER),,,,,,,HART,,,,,,,, ____ HEATHER),,,,,,PLUMMER,.,,, _______ ____ WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,. ___ DISTRICT 6 ! SM ITH) t I. I ' I •• WAHNER •••• I ·----MAURER> ••••••• HART •••••••• ____ WIEDER),,,,,.,STANTON,,,,, ____ DISTRICT 7 BEYER) t •• I. I I ,SMITH. I. I I.·- MAURER> ••••••• HART •••••••• ___ KENNEDY),,,,,,EDGAR,,.,,,, ____ LUXEMBlURGERJ,GRISET,,,,,, ___ MILLER ,,,,,,,SILLS,,,,,,,_ WIEDER ,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ____ GREEN) ••••• I •• WAHNER I I I • I ·---- DISTRICT 11 (MANDIC),, •• , •• BAILEY,,,,., _____ ____ (MANOIC),,,,,,,PATTINSON,,, ________ ____ (WIEDER),, •• ,,,STANTON,,,,, ____ ---____ 9/13/84 (PERRY),,,,,,,,CULVER,,,,,, (KENNEDY),,,,,,EDGAR,,,,,,,------- !SEIDE~),,,,,,,FRESE,,,,, ,,:::: :::: DAVIS),,,,,,,,GRIFFJN,,,,; __ LUXEMBOURGERJ,GRISET,,,,,, ____ ____ CRANK),,,,,,,,HANSON,,,,,, ____ ____ MAURERJt•••••1HARf,,,,,,,, ____ ____ MAHONEYJ,,,,,,HOLMBERG,,,, ____ ____ ODLUM),,,,,,,,KAWANAMJ,,,, _____ ADLER),,,,,,,,NEAL,,,,,,,, ____ ____ COOPERJ,,,,,,,NELSON,,,,,, ____ ____ FINLAYSONJ,,,,OLSON,,,,,,, ___ ____ (MULLEN),,,,,,,PARTJN,,,,,, ____ ____ (MANDIC),,,,,,,PATTJNSON,,, ___ ____ (CULVER),,,,,,,PERRY,,,,,,, ___ ____ HEATHERJ,,,,,,PLUMMER,,,,, ____ ___ OVERHOLTJ,,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,, ____ ____ KENNEDY),,,,,,SALTARELLI., ____ ____ MILLER)),,,,,,,SILLS,,,,,,, ____ ____ BEYER ~,,,,,,,SMITH,,,,,,, ____ ___ WIEDER ,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ____ ____ ! LANDER ,,,,,,,SYLVIA,,,,,, ____ ____ MANDJC),,,,,,,THOMAS,,,,,, ____ ____ GREEN/SMITHJ,,WAHNER,,,,,, ____ _____ MURPHY) t I • I I .-I WEDAA •· ••• I • ·--SIRIANIJ,,,,,,WEISHAUPT,,, ____ ___ mEE: OTHERS: SYLVESTER.,, ____ ____ CLARKE,,,,,, ____ ____ DAWES,,,,,,. ____ ____ ANDERSON,,,,~ ____ BUTLER,,,,,,...J::::_ ___ BROWN,,,,,,, ____ ___ BAKER,,,,,,, ____ ---- KYLE,,,,,,,, ___ ---YOUNG,,,,,,, ____ ____ VON LANGEN ____ ____ WINSOR,,,,,,___,.. ____ STREED,,,,,,~ ____ WOODRUFF,,,, ,/" ____ ATKINS,,,,,, ____ ____ HOHENER,,.,, ____ ____ HOWARD,,,,,, ____ ____ HUNT,,,,,,,, ____ ____ KEITH,,,,,,, ____ ____ KNOPF,,,,,,, ____ ____ LE BLANC,,,, ____ ____ LINDSTROM,,, ____ ____ LYNCH•••••••---____ MARTINSON,,, ____ ____ PEARCE,,,,,, ____ ____ COUNTY SANITATION DIS TRI er NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF AOO'OURNED REGULAR MEETING October 4, 1984 -3:00 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to the adjournment of the adjourned regular meeting of October 3, 1984, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date in the Districts' administrative offices. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. In the absence of the Secretary, Rita J. Brown, Chairman Hanson appointed William H. Butler Secretary pro tem. The roll was called and the Secretary pro tem reported a quorum present. DIREC?ORS PRESENT: DIRECTORS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRFSENT: OTHERS: Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset, Don Saltarelli Roger.Stanton William H. Butler, Secretary pro tem, Jeff Esber, Gary Streed Vice Joint Chairman Don Griff in, Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel * * * * * * * * * * * * * Report of General Counsel re The General Counsel briefed the proposed Ordinance No. 105 Directors regarding the proposed connection fee ordinance and indicated that it would become effective 30 days after adoption. Mr. Woodruff advised that the fee schedules proposed in the ordinance would commence January 1, 1985, as set forth in Section 1 of the ordinance. The connection fees of $500 per dwelling unit and $100 per 1,000 square feet are to be used to pay for facilities to serve new development. Adoption of Proposed Ordinance No. 105 Following a general discussion it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 105, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Amending Ordinance No. 104, Establishing Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be read by title onlyJ and, FURTHER ftl)VED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 105 by title only. ~; _1.0/04/84 . \.,.I Authorizing the General Manager to execute agreement with County Assessor's Office for Supplemental User Fee Data Base Development and EDP Support carried: Following a brief report by the Director of Finance regarding the support required from the County Assessor's Off ice to enable the District to implement a supplemental user fee program, it was moved, seconded and duly That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute an agreement with the Orange County Assessor's Office for computer programming and EDP processing to provide data base information, mailing labels and parcel charge tapes relative to planning and implementation of supplemental user fees to be collected on the property tax bill, for an amount not to exceed $75,000. Directing staff to submit standard agreements for collection of District's connection fees to Cities of Santa Ana and Tustin and the Costa Mesa Sanitary District Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, directed to prepare and submit standard agreements to the Cities of Santa Ana and Tustin and the Costa Mesa Sanitary District for collection of the District's connection fees, and to request approval of the agreements by the respective governing bodies of these ag~ncies. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman.then declared the meeting so adjourned at 4:00 p.m., October 4, 1984. Secretary pro tem of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California -3- ~ ..... '10/04/84 Adopting Ordinance No. 105 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following roll call vote: That Ordinance No. 105, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Amending Ordinance No. 104, Establishing Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be adopted. AYES: Directors Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset, Don Saltarelli NOFS: None ABSENT: Director Roger Stan ton Report of General Counsel re proposed Ordinance No. 106 The General Counsel briefed the Directors regarding the proposed supplemental user fee ordinance and reported that, if adopted, it would become effective 30 days after adoption. Mr. Woodruff indicated that the supplemental user fees proposed in the ordinance would commence on July 1, 1985. The user fees will pay the escalating costs of operation and maintenance, including facilities rehabilitation and replacement, resulting from higher levels of treatment required by the Federal and State regulatory agencies to comply with Federal Clean Water Act and the State of California Ocean Plan. Be further noted that should the Board elect to collect the supplemental user fee on the County tax rolls as allowed under California Health and Safety Code Section 5473, notices would have to be sent to all property owners within the District and a public hearing held regarding this proposed billing method prior to July 1, 1985. Adoption of Proposed Ordinance No. 106 Following a brief discussion it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 106, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title onlyi and, FURTHER MlVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 106 by title only. Adopting Ordinance No. 106 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following roll call vote: That Ordinance No. 106, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, Amending Ordinance No. 104, Establishing Sewer Connection Charges for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, be adopted. AD'S: Directors Robert Hanson, Chairman, Dan Griset, Don Saltarelli NOES: None ABSENT: Director Roger Stanton -2- • I