Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-07-11COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) July 3, 1984 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 WEDNESDAY, JULY 11, 1984 -7:30 P.M. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHCN ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE -Tuesday, July 24th at 4:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMIT'rEE -Wednesday, ,July 25th at 5: 30 p.rn. \ July August September October November December January February March April May June July COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 0 RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORN1A P.o.aox e121 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA92708 v (714) 540-2910 (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings Jul 11, 1984 Jul 25, 1984 Aug 8, 1984 None Scheduled Sep 12, 1984 Sep 26, 1984 Oct 10, 1984 Oct 24, 1984 Nov 14, 1984 Nov 28, 1984 Dec 12, 1984 None Scheduled Jan 9, 1985 Jan 23, 1985 Feb 13, 1985 Feb 27, 1985 Mar 13, 1985 Mar 27, 1985 Apr 10, 1985 Apr 24, 1985 May 8, 1985 May 22, 1985 Jun 12, 1985 Jun 26, 1985 Jul 10, 1985 Jul 24, 1985 ; .. :i BOARDS OF DIRECTORS . ...._· · County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: II oJ Orange County, Califomia JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 • 540-2910 9"62-2411 AGEND"A MEETING DATE JULY 11~ 1984 -7:30 P.M. ANY DIRECTOR DESIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ANY AGENDA ITEM~ PLEASE CALL THE MANAGER OR APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENI HEAD. IN .ADDITION~ STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE AT /:OU P.M. IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING WEDNESDAY'S MEETING (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation ( 2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Recognition of persons who wish to be heard on specific agenda items (5) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts, if any. See supplemental agenda (6) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no c0rrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered ·· by the Chairman: District 1 -June 13, 1984, regular District 2 -June 13·, 1984, regular District 3 -June 13, 1984, regular District 5 -June 13, 1984, regular District 6 -June 13, 1984, regular District 7 -June 13., 1984, regular District 11 -June 13, 1984, regular (7) Annual election of Joint Chairman -Nominee: Director Richard B. Edgar (8) Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman I ,L (9) ALL DISTRICTS Reports of: (a) Joint Chairman (b) General Manager (c) General Counsel .. ' (10) ALL DISTRICTS (11) Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See page(s) "A" and "B" 6/13/84 6/27/84 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund $ 178,530.47 $ 335,417.28 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -34,790.86 375,346.13 Joint Working Capital Fund 53,917.54 62,720.18 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 3,905.49 2,250.06 DISTRICT NO. 1 127.50 658.73 DIS~ICT NO. 2 5,117.57 654.37 DISTRICT NO. 3 29,567.78 10,692.30 DISTRICT NO. 5 321.57 3, 041. 03 DISTRICT NO. 6 40.38 655.05 DISTRICT NO. 7 68,925.50 2,706.42 DISTRICT NO. 11 6,913.78 696. 74 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 23.29 6, 468. 40 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT 22.87 $ 382,181.73 $801,329.56 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. ll(a) THROUGH ll~t} DISTRICTS All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate.by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent caiendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same. -2- ~ 7/11/84 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal Grants under 33 u.s.c., 1251 et seq. and State Grants under Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 and/or 1974, for the 1984-85 Joint Works Improvements and Additions: See page ncn District No. l 2 3 5 6 7 11 Resolution No. 84-104-1 84-105-2 84-106-3 84-107-5 84-108-6 84-109-7 84-110-11 (b) (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Filtrate Line to Distribution Box, Job No. PW-102, authorizing an addition of $3,718.00 to the contract with Peter C. David Company for miscellaneous items of extra work. See page "D" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-111, accepting Filtrate Line to Distribution Box, Job No. PW-102, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "E" (c) (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. PW-106, Replace "C" Headworks Conveyor at Treatment Plant No. 2, authorizing an addition of $1,407.00 to the contract with George and B. Morgan Company, Inc. for miscellaneous items of extra work, and granting a time extension of 41 calendar days for completion of said additional work.. See page "F" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-112, accepting Job No. PW-l06, Replace "C" Headworks Conveyor at Treatment Plant No. 2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "G" (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate an agreement with John Carollo Engineers to conduct a Digester Gas Utilization Study for consideration by the Boards (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-113, to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation and awarding contract for Auto Shop Hoist at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-083 (Rebid), to G. E. Jepson Div./Chas. E. Thomas Co. in the amount of $15,913.00. See pages "B" and "I" -3- 7/11/84 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (f) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase order contract for Landscape Maintenance, Specification No. M-015, to Tak Takamine Landscape &\...I Maintenance, for a total annual amount not to exceed $24,400.00 for Plants l and 2 and the Seal Beach Pump Station. See page "J" (g) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and reconunendation and awarding purchase of 12 Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-120, to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, in the amount of $39,331.00 plus tax. See page "K" (h) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase of Three (3) Four-Wheel Electric Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-121, to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, in the total amount of $9,384.75 plus tax. See page "K" (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award a purchase order contract to the low bidder for purchase of 16 Replacement Dresser Couplings for Metering Facilities, Specification No. E-153, for an amount not to exceed $12,000.00 plus tax and freight (j) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated June 25, 1984, relative to Standard Sewage Samplers for influent and effluent sampling to meet internal operating needs and to comply with EPA's requirements in accordance with the Districts' NPDES Permit. See page "L" (2) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to proceed on a force account basis for Fabrication, Installation and Covering of 16 Standard Sewage Samplers, Job No. PW-113, for a total maxim~ amount not to exceed $196,400.00 (3) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to negotiate and issue a purchase order to Randolph Austin Company in an·· amount not to exceed $28,240.00 (included in item 2 maximum amount above) plus tax and freight for purchase of 16 Proprietary Model 880 Peristaltic Pumps, Specification No. E-154, for use in said samplers (k) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-114, amending Resolution No. 75-146, appointing representatives for the Districts to act as agents on their behalf in the small claims court of the West Orange County Judicial District. See page "M" (1) Consideration of motion approving and authorizing execution of the Assignment of Contract re consulting agreements with K. P. Lindstrom & Associates, providing for assignment of said agreements to K. P. Lindstrom, Incorporated, in form approved by the General Counsel (firm has legally incorporated subsequent to \....i entering into said agreements with the Districts) -4- 7/11/84 (11) DISTRICT 2 (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-122-2, ordering annexation of .SS acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 50 -Casada Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. See page "N" (n) (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, providing for the addition of a minimum cover of three feet over conduits and stating that all metal parts shall be hot-dipped galvanized (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-123-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, to Subgrade Construction Corporation in the amount of $138,630.80. See pages "O" and "P" (o) (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Berryman & Stephenson, Inc. for design of the Taft Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-6-2, and City of Orange AHFP street improvements. See page "Q" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-124-2, approving agreement with Berryman & Stephenson, Inc. for design of the Taft Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-6-2, and City of Orange AHFP street improvements, on an hourly-rate basis plus overhead, direct expenses and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $26,950.00. See page "R" DISTRICT 7 (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-127-7, ordering annexation of 2.06 acres of territory t9 the District located on Greenwald Lane in the vicinity of Newport Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 94 - Moody Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (must also be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District) See page "S" (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-128-7, ordering annexation of 1.23 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Lemon Heights Drive and Lacuesta Drive in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 105 -Cormier Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (must also be annexed to the 70th Sewer,.Maintenance District) See page "T" (r) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-129-7, ordering annexation of .89 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Overhill Drive and Sirrine Drive in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 106 -O'Toole Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 (must also be annexed to the 70th Sewer Maintenance District) See page "U" -s- 7/11/84 (11) DISTRICT 7 (Continued) (s) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager and General Counsel to engage an appraiser for services in connectio~ ·' with obtaining an easement from the County of Orange for the .._., South Irvine Lift Station, Contract No. 7-7, for a maximum amount not to exceed $7,500.00 (t) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-130-7, approving plans and specification for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (tentative bid date 8/28/84). See page "VU END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from the consent calendar, if any -6- ,,..~ (13) 7/11/84 ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report (mailed to Directors on June 29th) (14) ALL DISTRICTS i...-1 Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive Committee: (a) Staff report re proposed fiscal year 1984-85 budgets (b) DISTRICT 1 -Roll call vote motion approving 1984-85 fiscal year budget (c) DISTRICT 2 Roll call vote motion approving 1984-85 fiscal year budget (d) DISTRICT 3 Roll call vote motion approving 1984-85 fiscal year budget (e) DISTRICT 5 Roll call vote motion approving 1984-85 fiscal year budget (f) DISTRICT 6 Roll call vote motion approving 1984-85 fiscal year budget (g) DISTRICT 7 Roll call vote motion approving 1984-85 fiscal year budget (h) DISTRICT 11 Roll call vote motion approving 1984-85 fiscal year budget (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in closed session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following resolutions establishing the annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal year 1984-85 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code: See page "W" (18) ALL DISTRICTS DIST. NO. 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 RESO. NO. 84-115-1 84-116-2 84-117-3 84-118-5 84-119-6 84-120-7 84-121-11 LIMITATION $1,658,694 6,897,324 0,.686,347 1,786,119 1,039,706 2,075,088 1,825,690 (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Interim Report of the Building Committee dated June 28, 1984, relative to additional office space requirements (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (b) Consideration of motion authorizing Phase I office modifications by force account work and acquisition of equipment in accordance with the Districts' purchasing procedures, to provide temporary office space in the administration building and Industrial Waste inspectors' office, for a maximum amount not to exceed $52,000.00, plus applicable sales tax and freight, estimated as follows: Administration Building modifications Industrial Waste Office modifications Partitioning Trailer for Conference/Training Room -7- $20,000 10,000 10,000 12,000 $52,000 plus sales tax and freight 7/11/84 (19) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to issue purchase order contracts in the negotiated total amount of $1,917,684.00 plus tax for the purchase of Nine (9) Ashbrook-Simon-Hartley (Winklepress) Belt Filter Presses and Appurtenances, Specification No. E-152, to replace existing worn-out and \ ·' inefficient sludge dewatering equipment at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 (negotiation ..__., authorized by the Boards on 5/09/84), as follows: ITEM AMOUNT TO 9 Belt filter presses $1,710,000 plus tax Ashbrook-Simon-Bartley 9 Control centers 166' 500 plus tax Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 9 Spare sets of belts 41,184 plus tax Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. $1,917,684 plus tax (20) ALL DISTRICTS Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 1 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 3 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 11 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of actions re sewer service charges for 1984-85: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Staff Report dated July 3, 1984, relative to the proposed sewer service charges for fiscal year 1984-85. (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (b) Consideration of motion approving schedule of sewer service charges for 1984-85 at the same rates in effect for 1983-84 (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-125-5, directing the County Auditor-Controller ~o incl~de sewer service charges established by Ordinance No. 513 on the 1984-85 property tax bills. See page "X" (28) DISTRICT 5 Other business or conununications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- # 0 ~ 7/11/84 {30) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of actions re sewer service charges for 1984-85: {a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Staff Report dated July 3, 1984, relative to the proposed sewer service charges for fiscal year 1984-85. {Copy enclosed with agenda material) {b) Consideration of motion approving schedule of sewer service charges for 1984-85 at the same rates in effect for 1983-84 (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-126-6, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges established by Ordinance No. 607 on the 1984-85 property tax bills. See page "Y" (31) DISTRICT 6 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any {32) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (33) DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Consideration of the following actions in connection with formation of proposed District No. 13: {a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Interim District 13 Steering Committee Report dated June 28, 1984 (Copy enclosed with agenda material) {b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Summary of Engineer's Report and Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report on proposed District No. 13 (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (c) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Engineer's County Sanitation District No. 13 Formation Report, prepared by Lowry.& Associates (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (d) Consideration of motion approving Formation Schedule re proposed District No. 13: Boards receive & file Draft EIR EIR Hearing EIR Comment Period ends Final EIR mailed to Boards Adopt EIR LAFC Hearing 7/11/84 8/08/84 8/27/84 9/20/84 10/10/84 11/07/84 (e) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of District No. 13, prepared by Ultrasystems, Inc. (Copy enclosed with agenda material) (2) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of the Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of proposed District No. 13, in accordance with CEQA requirements (Item 33(e) continued on page 10) -9- 7/11/84 (33) DISTRICTS 2 & 7 (Continued) (e) (3) Consideration of motion establishing August 27, 1984, as the final date for which all comments must be received on the Draft Focused Environmental Impact re formation of proposed District No. 13 (4) Consideration of motion fixing August 8, 1984, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Office, as the date, time and place for public.hearing on the Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of proposed District No. 13 (34) DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Consideration of motion authorizing District No. 2, on behalf of itself and District No. 7, to adopt a single ordinance fixing fees for proposed District No. 13 and to collect and provide record keeping for all fees received on account for District No. 13 (35) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of actions re proposed Ordinance No. 206: See page "Z" (a) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 206, An Ordinance of County Sanitation District No. 2 Establishing Separate Service Area zones and Establishing a Schedule of Connection Charges and Sewer Use Charges for the Use of District Sewerage Facilities by Properties Located Outside the Present District Boundaries, by title only, and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present) (b) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. 206, An Ordinance of County Sanitation District No. 2 Establishing Separate Service Area Zones and Establishing a Schedule of Connection Charges and Sewer Use Charges for the Use of District Sewerage Facilities by Properties Located Outside \...,.,) the Present District Boundaries, and pass to second reading on August 8, 1984 (36) DISTRICT 2 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (37) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 38) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of request of Electrolurgy, Inc. for extension of date for compliance with terms and conditions of Stipulated Agreement dated January 9, 1984, relative to Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 7-162: (a) Staff report (Written report will be forwarded to Directors under separate cover) (b) Consideration of action on request (39) DISTRICT 7 Other business or communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (40) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- • I ..I I _, I ..I J - I ~ J . .- i I -i ,,...._ J I ..i --J I ..I I .J I -'" I I ...i j .... -· -~ ··- -1-==================~----------~.~ . COUNTY SANITATION · __ DISTRICT NO. 13 --FORMATION REPORT PREPARED FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE ·couNTY PREPARED BY l.m.,,,, cflfiSiic1ates CONSUL TING ENGINEERS IRVINE, CALIFORNIA JUNE 1984 _.:;:'":=:-:~:.:~·.· ... :-~:..:: --:.~ ----~----- \ \ ' - - - ... - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 FORMATION REPORT PREPARED FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PREPARED BY LOWRY & ASSOCIATES 17748 SKY PARK BOULEVARD SUITE 100 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714 JONE 1984 .. --- - TABLE OF CONTENTS 111111 PAGE NO. -BACKGROUND 1 OBJECTIVES 1 AUTHORIZATION 2 .-STUDY AREA 2 LAND USE 4 FLOW PROJECTIONS 4 -COLLECTION FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 6 JOINT WORKS FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 9 CONNECTION FEES 11 -CAPACITY REQUIREMENT AND COSTS 14 LIST OF FIGURES ... FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE NO. -1 BOUNDARY MAP 3 2 ULTIMATE LAND USE PLAN 5 3 COLLECTION FACILITIES UTILIZED BY DISTRICT NO. 13 8 4 CONNECTION FEE ZONES 15 LIST OF TABLES TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE NO. 1 PROJECTED ULTIMATE LAND USE AND SEWAGE FLOW FOR DISTRICT NO. 13 7 2 EXISTING AND PROPOSED COLLECTION FACILITIES-DISTRICT NO. 13 SHARE 10 3 JOINT WORKS FACILITIES-DISTRICT NO. 13 SHARE 12 4 SUMMARY 13 5 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 13 FACILITIES COST SHARE 16 APPENDIX A COLLECTION FACILITIES COSTS ... - - - - ... - BACKGROUND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 FORMATION REPORT This report details the formation of a new Sanitation District, to be known as Sanitation District No. 13. The new District will be comprised of areas to the northeast of existing Districts 2 and 7. It includes areas not presently annexed to any Sanitation District but within the proposed Master Plan service area for Districts 2 & 7, and properties annexed to Districts 2 & 7 subsequent to June 7, 1978, that should now more logically be in District No. 13. The formation ·of · - this District is the result of lengthy negotiations between the Dis- tricts and the County of Orange which centered around obtaining adequate revenues from these lands to fund their share of wastewater collection, treatment and disposal costs. Pursuant to the negotiated agreement, County Sanitation District No. 13 will not receive a share of the County ad valorem taxes but will rely on connection and user fees for necessary wastewater revenues. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this report is to develop the boundaries for the new Sanitation District, determine equitable connection fees for the area and provide other necessary information for use by the Districts' Board of Directors in the formation of the new District. Following 1 ... ... - - .... ... - .... ... - the Districts• action to form Sanitation District No. 13, Local Agency Formation Commission and Boards of supervisors approval will be neces- sary • AUTHORIZATION On December 8, 1982, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Dis- tricts No. 2 & 7 adopted Resolution 82-170, approving an agreement with Lowry & Associates for preparation of this Formation Report on a per diem fee basis not to exceed $46,500. On April 11, 1984, an addendum to Lowry•s agreement was executed authorizing Lowry to amend this report and revise the legal descriptions on a per diem fee basis not to exceed $7,600, consistent with the modified boundary approved by the Boards of Directors on February 8, 1984. STUDY AREA The area to be included was determined by defining all undeveloped land between the existing boundaries of Districts No. 2 & 7 and the boundary of the County of Orange. Also included were certain areas in various stages of development that were in the process of annexing to either District No. 2 or No. 7. some of these parcels are being included in the new District and will be discussed in a subsequent section of this report. In order to determine the eastern boundary, the District• s previous master planning was analyzed closely and a logical tributary drainage area was developed. The resulting boundary for County Sanitation District No. 13 is shown in Figure 1. A detailed legal description and map developed for this boundary (Reor- 2 - ... ganization No. 65) has been submitted to LAFCO for their approval pending completion of the EIR. LAND USE Land use plans for ultimate build-out of the study area were gathered from the appropriate jurisdictional agencies and a composite land use plan for the proposed District No. 13 is shown on Figure 2. The pro- posed District No. 13 will include over 23, 500 total acres of which over 60 percent, or 14,300 acres, is desi,gnated as recreational and open space uses. FLOW PROJECTIONS The new District is projected to generate an average flow of 11.04 million gallons per day (mgd) based on the ultimate land use as shown in Table 1. Ultimate sewage flows for each drainage region are indi- cated on Figure 2, the composite land use plan. As can be seen, District No. 13 drains to many different basins which will require the utilization of capacity in existing and proposed collection facilities of other Districts in addition to joint works facilities for treatment and disposal. 4 ... ... ... ... ... It is anticipated that the cwmnulative wastewater flows generated by District No. 13 will be phased as follows: FY 1984-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 88-89 89-90 94-95 2005-06 COLLECTION FACILITY REQUIREMENTS Total Flow (mgd) 0.10 0.93 1.63 2.03 2.50 3.50 1.00 11.04 Flows from the new District will be tributary to the existing and pro- jected wastewater collection facilities depicted on Figure 3. Based on projected District 13 flows and the Consolidated Master Plans, pro- portionate capacity requirements were developed for the new District in each of these existing collection facilities as well as new collection facilities which are anticipated to be needed in the future. District No. 13' s proportionate capacity requirements in existing and future facilities are shown in Appendix A. The Consoli- dated Master Plans and also past planning assumed that the study area would ev~ntually be annexed to either District No. 2 or District No. 7 and capacity requirements in the Consolidated Master Plans were developed based on that assumption. After the capacity exchanges reconunended in the Master Plans are accomplished, the new District can then purchase the collection facility capacity from either District No. 2 or No. 7 as appropriate. 6 Ir ... TABLE 1 PROJECTED ULTMATE LAND USE AND SEWAGE FLOW FOR DISTRICT NO. 13 -.I SEWAGE FLOW PROJECTED LAND USE AREA COEFFICIENT AVERAGE FLOW (AC) (GAL/DAY/AC) (MGD) Residential Estate Density 7,784 1000 7.78 Low Density 448 1550 0.69 Medium Density 173 3880 0.67 High Density 64 5820 0.37 Commercial 30 3230 0.10 -Recreational and o.s. 14,306 100 1.43 vacant (Frwy, Etc.) 767 TOTALS 23,572 11.04 - ... 7 ... The current value of the existing collection facilities was determined by using the District's standard policy of escalating the project cost at the time of construction1 the ratio of the current ENR over the ENR for the time of construction. District No. 13' s proportionate share of the cost of proposed future collection facilities is determined from today's cost of constructing these proposed facilities times the ratio of the new District's flow requirements to the total projected flow requirements. The detailed development of these facilities and their costs is included in Appendix A and summarized in Table 2. These costs were originally developed at August, 1982 dollars when the 20 Cities average ENR was 3,870. Therefore, they are escalated to July, 1984 dollars by the ratio of 4,200 (estimated 20 Cities ENR) over 3,870. JOINT WORKS FACILITY REQUIREMENTS District No. 13 will also be required to purchase its proportionate share in existing joint works facilities such as treatment plant capacity, administrative facilities, outfall capacity, etc. The pro- portionate capacity of District No. 13 is based on District No. 13's projected flow requirements of 11. 04 mgd over the rated capacity of these existing facilities, 208 mgd. District No. 13 will also be responsi,!>le for their share of future joint works facilities. The District No. 13 share of these joint works facilities is swmnarized in Table 3. 9 - - - - ... - - TABLE 2 EXISTING COLLECTION FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13 SHARE FACILITY Carbon Canyon Interceptor Richfield and Kellogg Sub Trunks South Santa Ana River Interceptor Santa Ana River Interceptor Tustin-Orange Interceptor * Orangethorpe Trunk and Relief Knott Interceptor FACILITY TOTAL @ ENRzo = 3870 TOTAL @ ENR 20 = 4200 NEW COLLECTION FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13 SHARE Carbon Canyon Interceptor (Tunnel Alt.) Imperial Highway Relief Taft Branch Parallel and Relief South Santa Ana River Int. Parallel Chapman.Extension Handy Creek Parallel Fullerton-Brea Parallel Orangethorpe Parallel TOTAL @ ENRzo = 3870 TOTAL @ ENR20 = 4200 COST $ 798 ,803 34,220 278,057 3,270,656 1,837,976 59,580 473,898 $6,753,190 $7,329,043 COST $2,309,960 26,400 190,497 280,000 178,000 308,133 542,287 534,905 $4,370,182 $4,742,833 * ~ustin-Orange Interceptor includes Handy Creek, Santiago Canyon Road Trunk, the Red Hill Interceptor and Relief Trunk and the Sunflower Interceptor. Costs have been escalated based on ratio of 20 Ci ties Average ENR to anticipated July, 1984 ENR of 4200. Capacity in these existing collection systems can be pur- chased on a phased basis as the area develops. 10 ... - ... - ... - CONNECTION PEES It is recommended that District No. 13 consist of three separate zones for colledtiOn of fees. 1. 2. ZONE A -Includes parcels for which negotiations have already started for annexation to either District No. 2 or 7 or parce.ls which have completed annexation to either District but will be deannexed and incorporated into District 13. Table 4 shows these parcels including the annexation fees in effect when the annexa- tion was requested, fees paid to date and the number of acres and lots in each annexation proposal. Since monies have already been deposited with the Districts, fees should be based on the annexa- tion fees established at the time annexation was requested. These fees range from $1138/acre to $1616/acre depending on when annexation procedures were initiated. Additionally, connection fees of $220 per dwelling unit or $45 per 1000 square feet for industrial/cormnercial should be collected based on the level of development anticipated when annexation was requested. Development greater than the acreages or lots shown in Table 4 should be charged at the current zone B rate. ZONE B -This zone incorporates areas included within the Districts• ultimate Master Plan where no annexation procedures have been initiated. Based on the cost analyses of existing and proposed collection facilities and joint works facilities, the zone B area should be assessed connection fees of $1,250/dwelling unit for residential or $250/1000 sq. ft. for industrial/ cormnercial development. 11 ... - TABLE 3 JOINT WORKS FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13 SHARE Existing Joint Works Facilities (Book Value) Land Cost (Book Value) Total Existing Joint Works Existing Joint works Capacity = 208 mgd Projected District No. 13 Flow = 11.04 mgd $241,639,245 1,969,000 $243,608,245 * District No. 13 Share = $243,608,245 x 1 ~0 ~4 = $ 12,929,976 Future Joint Works Facilities (Estimate) $86,000,000 * District No. 13 Share = $86,000,000 x 1 ~0 ~4 = $ 4,564,615 * Total District No. 13 Share $ 17 ,494,591 * Example calculation. Assumes that flow and assessed valuation are equal. Actual calculation would be made at time of purchase based on District's equity formula. 12 .... - TABLE 4 SUMMARY June 1, 1984 ACRFAGE FEE ANNEXATION NO. RATE ($/ACRE) DISTRICT NO. 2 21 1138(avg) 24 1) 1438 28R 1496 35 2) 1496 47 52 3) 1616 55 4) DISTRICT NO. 7 109 TOTAL ACREAGE FEE PAID (Existing Revenue) PROJECTED AC. FEE CONN. FEES ALRFADY PAID PROJECTED CONN. FEES TOTAL PROJECTED REVENUE ACREAGE FEES MAXIMUM DEVELOPABLE PAID ACRES LOTS ($) 157,897 90,860 253,250 2,017,506 0 0 0 $2,519,513 723,030 257,023 1,231,560 $4,731,126 138.75 175.42 169.28 1348.60 177.82 335.20 30.0 TOTAL LOTS (5598 x $220/du) 265 249 559 4105 COMM. COLLEGE 420 . COMM. COLLEGE 5598 1) Excludes Tract No's. 9955-58, 10265-67 and 10592 that were part of orig1nal annexation proposal. These tracts will be in District No. 2. 2) Excludes Tract No. 10504 that was part of original annexation pro- posal. This tract will be in District No. 2. 3) Excludes Tract No. 11174 that was part of original annexation pro- posal. This tract will be in District No. 2. 4) Tract No. 10899 paid zone B connection fees and will not pay any /r annexation fees. Excludes Tract No. 9927, 10130 and 10470 which will be in District No. 2. 13 3. ZONE C -zone C includes the region tributary to the Carbon Canyon Pump Station. The connection fee for this area is higher because-the cost of providing service must include either a pump station/force main system or a gravity tunnel system. The con- nection fee for Zone c is recommended to be $1500/dwelling unit or $300/1000 sq. ft. for industrial/commercial. The location of these three zones and the zone A parcels is shown on Figure 4. CAPACITY REQUIREMENT AND COSTS As can be seen from Table 4, to date, $2.52 mllion has already been collected from the zone A area of District No. 13 in annexation fees and $0.26 million collected in connection fees. This money, $2. 78 million, along with a projected $1.23 million in additional connec- tion fees and $0.72 million in additional acreage fees, can be applied to purchase necessary capacity in the joint works and collection facilities. I ~ The proposed District No. 13 share of all the costs involved in deter- mining fees are swmnar ized in Table 5 along with unit costs per million gallons. Based upon these costs and the total projected reve- nue (acreage and connection fees of $4. 73 million), District No. 13 has adequate funds for the purchase of collection, treatment and disposal capacity (its proportionate share of all necessary facili- ties). It is recormnended that the new District purchase 0.9 million gallons a day of capacity in existing facilities with its existing 14 .... - TABLE 5 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 13 FACILITIES COST SHARE Existing Collection Facilities Existing Joint Works Facilities Formation Expenses Subtotal Existing Future Collection Facilities Future Joint Works Facilities Subtotal Future Grand Total 16 TOTAL DISTRICT 13 $ 7,329,043 12,929,976 100,000 $20,359,019 $ 4,742,833 4,564,615 $ 9,307,448 $29,666,467 UNIT COST $1,844 ,114/mgd $ 843,066/mgd $2,687,180/mgd ... revenues. The remaining necessary capacity can be purchased in the future when development levels warrant additional capacity. Future ... connection and acreage fee revenues should be used to fund District No. 13's share of additional capacity in existing and proposed future collection and joint works facilities. ;. .... ... 17 - ... .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 .. . ---- FORMATION REPORT APPENDIX A - ... TABLB l ... SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 COLLECTION FACILITIES TRIBOTARY TO PLANT NO. 1 ENR20 =3870 (Aug. 1982) DISTRICT NO. 13 ULTIMATE SEWAGB FACILITY PACI LI TIES PLOW COST DISTRICT NO. 13 SHUB (mgd) ($) (%) ($) -New PiJ2!z Carbon Canxon Interce2tor Tunnel Alternative 2.02 3,655,000 63.2 2,309,960 Carbon Canl!:!n Interce2tor Existing 21• to Camden 2.02 1,343,322 34.1 458,073 ... Camden to Sta. 100+36 2.02 577,758 9.0 51,998 Sta. 100+36 to c.c. Channel 2.02 1,171,253 7.0 81,988 c.c. Channel to Sta. 27+46 2.02 1,443,617 8.4 121,264 Sta. 27+46 to Grove 2.02 1,275,826 6.7 85i480 SUBTOTAL 7-98,803 --Richfield Sub-Trunk Orangethorpe to 33• Stub 0.17 762,850 2.7 20,597 42• to S .A.R.I. 0.17 11,975 3.4 407 SUBTOTAL 21,004 Ke11!:!9g Sub-Trunk Orangethorpe to 250' South 0.29 41,474 2.6 l,078 250' South to S.A.R.I. 0.29 303,438 4.0 12il38 SUBTOTAL 13,216 New PiJ2!: Ime!rial B!;l• Orangethorpe to LaPalma o.58 150,000 17.6 26,400 .i New PiJ2!: Parallel Taft Branch Meats to Taft and Tustin 0.24 423,000 12.3 52,029 2500 L.F. of 2i in. -Tustin to Sta. 20+50 0.24 438,557 10.4 45,610 3000 L.F. of 18 in. Sta. 20+50 to Batavia 0.24 881, 793 9.0 79,361 5200 L.F. of 21 in. Batavia to S.A.R.I. 0.24 555,000 2.l 11,655 2500 L.F. of 27 in. Connection Structure 0.24 87,711 2.1 li8'2 SUBTOTAL 190,497 - - - - - - - - TABLB 1 (Continued) DISTRicr NO. 13 ULTIMATE SBWAGB FACILITY PACILITIBS PLOW COST DISTRicr NO. 13 SBAD (mgd) ($) <•> ($) New Pipe: Parallel South Santa Ana River Interce2tor Solomon to Imperial Hwy. o.58 280,000 100* 280,000 2400 L.P. of 15 in. south Santa Ana River Interce2tor Santa Ana Cyn. Rd. to B/O Durango 1.22 60,000 42.8 25,680 B/O Durango to E/O Palmera 1.22 349,565 28.8 100,675 E/O Palmera to Solomon 1.22 123, 770 21.4 26,487 Solomon to Imperial Hwy .64 161,108 10.2* 16,433 S/O Fwy. to La Palma 1.22 632,456 17.2 108i782 SUBTOTAL 278,057 Santa Ana River Interce2tor ,s.A.R.I.2 B/O Gypsum Cyn. Rd. to Sta. 1071 0.26 1,815,764 1.2 21,789 Sta. 1071 to Sta. 991 0.67 2,328,074 3.4 79,155 -- Sta. 991 to Sta. 913+50 3.50 2,688,953 13.3 357,631 Sta. 913+50 to Sta. 893 4.05 625,385 14.5 90,681 Sta. 893 to Imperial Hwy. 4.05 1,634,958 14.8 241,974 Imperial Hwy. to Sta. 778+32 5.85 2,224,545 20.0 444,909 Sta. 778+32 to Richfield 6.14 1,697,073 25.0 424,268 Richfield to Sta. 678+06 6.31 2,110,698 18.l 382,036 Sta. 678+06 to Sta. 596 8.33 l,913,678 9.2 176,058 Sta. 596 to AT&SP RR 8.57 3,024,131 6.1 184,472 AT&SP to Plant No. l 8.57 17,013,396 5.1 867i683 SUB'l'O'l'AL 3,270,656 S.A.R.I. SYSTEM TOTAL 7,188,593 New Pieez Chapnan B/O Newport to· Bandy Creek 1.76 178,000 100 178,000 isoo L.P. of is• Handy Creek Chapman to Amapola 1.76 28,395 88.9 25,243 Amapola to S/O Mead 1.76 37,125 71.5 26i544 SUBTOTAL 51,787 * 0.58 mgd ~average) is carried by the new pipe and 0.64 mgd by the existing section for a total of 1.22 mgd. - TABLB l (Continued) DISTRICT NO. 13 ..... ULTIMATE SBWAGB PACILITY FACILITIES PLOW COST DISTRICT NO. 13 SHARB (mgd) ($) <•> ($) New Pie!: Handx creek S/O Mead to Orange Park 1.76 469,000 65.7 308,133 ... 2700 L.P. of 21• Santiago C:i!!• Rd. Trunk Clark to Linda Vista 1.76 207,933 60.3 125,384 -Tustin-Orange Linda Vista to Santiago Blvd. 1.76 68,065 60.3 41,043 Sanitago Blvd. to Earlham 1.76 634,271 45.l 286,056 .. Earlham to N/O Cranbrook 1.76 891,128 30.9 275,359 N/0 Cranbrook.to S.A. Pwy. 1.76 1,324,341 27.9 369,491 S.A. Pwy. to Red Bill 1.76 380,227 18.9 71,863 SUB'l'O'l'AL 1,043,812 Red Bill Relief Trunk --Mitchell to AT&SP RR 1.76 397,881 15.4 61,274 AT&SF RR to Bell 1.76 777,063 10.9 84,700 -SUBTOTAL 145,974 Red Bill Interceptor -Bell to McGaw 1.76 1,228,384 8.1 99,499 McGaw to Sunflower 1.76 2,092,703 5.0 104,635 Sunflower to Main 1.76 513,132 3.3 16,933 SUBTOTAL 221,067 sunflower Interce2tor Main to Bear 1.76 3,307,045 3.1 102,518 Bear to Plant No. l 1.76 5,897,346 2.5 147 ,434 SUBTOTAL 249,952 TUSTIN-ORANGE SYSTEM TOTAL 2,324,109 - EXISTING FACILITIES TOTAL 6,219,712 NEW PACILITIES TOTAL li292,990 TRIBUTARY TO PLANT NO. 1 GRAND TOTAL 9,512,702 - -.. TABLE 2 SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 COLLECTION ... FACILITIES TRIBUTARY 'l'O PLANT NO. 2 ENR@ • 3870 (Aug. 1982) -DISTRICT NO. 13 OLTIMATB SEWAGE FACILITY FACILITIES PLOW COST DISTRICT NO. 13 SHARE (mgd) ($) (%) ($) New PiJ:!!: Parallel Fullerton-Brea Brea to Rolling Bills P.S. 0.71 565,873 9.7 54,890 2850 L.P. of 30 and 24 in. R.H. P.S. to N/O Panorama 0.71 1,111,850 13.4 148,988 -6860 L.P. to 21 in. N/O Panorama to Lemon 0.71 477,681 11.9 56,844 2590 L.P. of 24 in. Lemon to Rosslynn 0.71 2,149,481 9.4 202,051 9960 L.P. of 24 and 30 in. Rosslynn to Jefferson 0.71 1,529,115 5.2 79,514 ~ SUBTOTAL 542,287 ---Orangethorpe Jefferson to Brookhurst 0.71 359,741 9.4 33,816 New PiJ:!!: orangethor~ Brookhurst to Magnolia 0.71 1,025,000 15.3 156,825 5300 L.P. of 24 in. Magnolia to Western 0.71 8000 L.P. of 21 in. 1,360,000 27.8 378,080 SUBTOTAL 534,905 Oran9ethor2! Relief western to Knott 0.71 888,422 2.9 25,764 Knott Interceptor Orangethorpe to Lincoln 0.71 5,830,798 1.8 104,954 Lincoln to Katella 0.71 7,552,465 1.4 105,735 -Katella to Westminster 0.11 8,892,059 1.2 106,705 Westminster to Newland 0.71 8,607,175 0.9 77,465 Bolsa to,rookhurst 0.71 13,173,142 0.6 79,039 ... StJB'l'OTAL 473,898 EXISTING FACILITIES TOTAL 533,478 NEW FACILITIES TOTAL li077il92 TRIBUTARY TO PLANT NO. 2 GRAND TOTAL 1,610, 670 -k - ... . ...i DRAFT FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROJECT: Formation of Sanitation District No. 13 · Applicant: Orange County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley CA 92708 June 1984 - - ... - ... 4116 SCREEN CHECK EIR (SUBMITTED ) DRAFT EIR (ACCEPTED --------) PROPOSED FINAL EIR (APPROVED ) FINAL EIR (CERTIFIED COMPLETED ON ) STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER: 82082005 FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR.THE FORMATION OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 AND RELATED FISCAL AGREEMENTS Prepared by: ULTRASYSTEMS, INC. 16845 Von Karman Avenue Irvine, California 92714 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 JUNE 1984 - ... ... - .. .. Section 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .•••.••••••••••.•••••••.•.••••••••..•• 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION •••..••.•••••••.•.•••••••••••••••••• 4 1.1 Location and Boundaries 1.2 Statement of Objectives ••••••.•••••••.••••••••.••• 1.3 Project Characteristics ••.•..•••••••••••••••..•••• 4 4 7 2.0 OVERVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ••••••.••••••••••• 15 2.1 Existing Conditions •••••••••••••••••••••••.••••.•• 15 2.2 Related Projects •••••..••••••.•••••••••••.•••••••• 15 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ••.••••••• 16 3.1 Land Use ••••.•••••••.••••••••.•.•••••••.••...•••••.• 16 3 .1.1 Inducement of Urban Growth. . . • • • • • • . . . . • . • • • 16 3.2 Populatibn •••••••.•••••••••••.••••.•••.•••••.•.... 23 4.0 LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ••••..••• 24 5.0 4.1 The Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of Man's Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity • • • • • . • . • • . . • • • • • . • • • • . • • • • . • • • . . . . • • • 24 4.2 Irreversible Environmental Changes •..••••••••••.••• 25 4.3 The Growth-Inducing Impact of the Proposed Action ····················~·············· 26 IMPACTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT .••.••.•..••.•.•.••• 27 6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ••..•••..••••.••••••••.•.•••••..•.•.• 28 7.0 SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES •...•••••••..•••••••..•.• 29 8.o· UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS . .. • • • • • • . • . • • • • • . • • • . • • • . •.• • 30 i -at:B~~-~.s · · .,. ~ ~r · Table of Contents -Continued -. ,•- - - - Section Page 9.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION •.•••••••••••.•••••• .-32 9.1 No Project or Postponement .•••••••••••••••••••••••• 32 9.2 Alternatives to the Formation of Sanitation District No. 13. • •••.•••••••••••.•••••••••••••••• 32 9.3 Alternative Treatment of Sewage ••••••••••••••.•.•• 33 9.4 Annex Entire Unannexed Area to District No. 7 or District No. 2 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 33 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED •••••••••••••••••••• 34 11.0 REFERENCES ·~··········································· 35 APPENDICES Appendix A -Initial Study Appendix B -Formation Cost Analysis Appendix C -Responses to the Notice of Preparation Appendix D -Statement of Costs ii -LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 REGIONAL MAP ••••.••••••••••••••••••••• ~ •••••••••••••• 5 2 SPHERES OF INFLUENCE ••••••.•••••••••••••••.•••••..•.• 6 3 BOUNDARY MAP OF PROPOSED SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 ·8 4 DEVELOPMENTS TO BE DETACHED FROM DISTRICTS NO. 2 AND 7 AND OTHER APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS •••••.•••••••••• 9 5 ULTIMATE LAND USE PLAN FOR PROPOSED SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 •.••••.•••••••••••.•••••••..•••••••••• 13 -6 MASTER PLAN COLLECTION AND TREATMENT FACILITIES TO BE USED BY PROPOSED DISTRICT NO. 13 ..................... 14 - LIST OF TABLES Table 1 PROPERTIES TO BE DETACHED FROM DISTRICT NO. 2 AND NO. 7 ••••••••••.••••.•••••••••••.•••••••.•• 10 2 ULTIMATE LAND USE PLAN •••••••••••..•••••••.•..••••••• 11 - iii ... i I ... - - - INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been pre- pared for use by the Orange County Sanitation Districts, affected public agencies and the general public for evaluation of the proposed reorganization of Sanitation Districts No. 2 and No. 7, and the for- mation of Sanitation District No. 13. The Draft EIR h~s been prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines as amended July 16, 1983.· This EIR will focus on anticipated environmental issues and concerns, that may result from approva 1 of proposed District No. 13. This Environmental Impact Report is being prepared for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. Consultant costs are based on time and materials, not to exceed $8,174. Background of the Project The Orange County Sanitation Districts have historically provided sewer service, ~ewage treatment and maintenance of facilities from funds received by property tax allocation. Subsequent to the passage and enactment of the tax initiative measure on June 7, 1978, the Sanitation Districts no longer· receive funds from property tax allocations on new developments annexing to the Districts for service. When the Districts determined they would not receive funds from four developments already annexed and would not receive funds from six other approved developments awaiting annexation, they beg.an negotiations with the Orange County Board of Supervisors concerning l - -- - - annexations to the Sanitation Districts. The negotiations were de- signed to give the decision makers an opportunity to work out an equitable alternative to sewer service and facility funding under ABS.* It has been decided that the Sanitation Districts' objective would be accomplfshed by fonnation of the new· district that would include 1) developm~nts in Districts No. 2 and No. 7 presently annexed but not contributing funds to the Districts, 2) approved developments awaiting annexation to District No. 2 or No. 7,_.and 3) future adjacent developments. There are other areas outside the Sanitation District boundaries that will eventually need annexation. The formation of Distri"ct 13 will provide sewer service only to the areas within the boundaries of District 13 and will not resolve all annexation problems of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following identified land use and population impacts are associated with developments that have been approved by local agencies and are not associated with the proposed formation of District No. 13 by the Orange County Sanitation Districts. *Assembly Bill 8 (ABB) allows an agency to negotiate with the County Board of Supervisors to obtain a share of the one percent ad valorem Property Tax, but does not require the County to share the tax revenue. 2 - I .. - .. Project Impacts · 3.1 Land Use Continued development in the District 13 area will ·result in significant land use impacts. Since the area is included in the Orange County Sanitation Districts Master Plan, and will receive sewage collection and treat- ment either from Districts 2 or 7, or from the new District 13, project approval has no impact on land use. 3.2 Population Mitigation Measures Mitigation measures· cannot be identified at this time, but environmental review and analysis by the appropriate land agency, on a case by case basis would insure identification and mitigation of any significant impacts associated with developmental approv- als. An anticipated growth Same as above rate from zero to 5.6 percent per year over a 20-year period is antici- pated. ·This is within th~ estimated population growth forecasted for the area between 1980 and 2000, and would occur with or with- out formation of District 13 • 3 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts No unavoidable adverse impacts have been identified. None have been ident- ified. - - - 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.1 Location and Boundaries The project area 1 ies in northeastern O~ange County as shown in Figure 1. The proposed project area will constitute Dis- trict No. 13. The proposed District is bordered on the north by the Los Angel es County 1 i ne, on the east by the San Berna rd i no and Riverside County 1 ine, on the south by the Orange County portion of the Santa Ana Mountains and on the west by the Orange County commun- ities of Brea, Yorba Linda, Anaheim, and Orange. The project is also within the sphere of influence of the Irvine Ranch . Water Di s.tri ct . .. The Cities' spheres of influence are .delineated on Figure 2. • 1.2 Statement of Objectives ~ The Orange County Sanitation Districts are proposing the formation of a new Sanitation District (District No. 13) for the purpose of providing service 1) to areas which are not presently annexed to any Sanitation District but are within the proposed service area as ·shown on the District's Master Plan of Sewers, and 2) those properties within the proposed service ·area which have been annexed to Districts No. 2 and No. 7 subsequent to June 7, 1978, and are receiving service but are not contributing financially through taxes for the service or facilities. The purpose of District No. 13 is to provide a separate entity through which wastewater transportation, treatment and dis- posal service will be furnished and financed for properties within the proposed District. Pursuant to a negotiated settlement with the County of Orange, no ad valorem tax monies from these properties will be allocated to the Sanitation District to pay for sewerage services provided by the District. Thus, said services are proposed to be financed in the new District by connection fees and annual user fees. 4 ·~r ... -'.--ff _J, ~· l_;:; -.'' -.~~.~~ .. I (J -~A -AV ~' w ~ > ~ ... ~ ~ "" ,.--' 0 ~( .J < !!! .J < < t.I CC ARl"' , / ~-, LA ,I <. r .... GL 0 <"' \ SILVERADO CANYON 'l QMODJESK.t. I TRABUCO OAKS - VIEJO - SCALE: 1" = 3.5 MI. Source: Ti t l e: THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS REGIO NAL MAP (APPROXIMATCLY) 1 5 - - - - - • • MAltl!lli1 .. ,· ' . ' No Sca le Source: LAF CO 6 ... / .· /\ / , ' " , \ Title: SPHERES OF INFLU ENCE ... .·" ,• .. ·· .· \ 1 \ 2 -.. .. 1.3 Project Characteristics County Sanitation Districts No's. 2 and 7 of Orange County have pre pa red this En vi ronmenta 1 Impact Report to address measures relative to the proposed reorganization of certain territory into a new sanitation· district to be known as District No. 13. The new District will include certain territory now within Districts No. 2 and No. 7 along with territory outside the boundaries but within the tributary area included in the District No. 2 and No. 7 Master Plan of Trunk Sewers. The proceedings for forming the new District will be conducted pursuant to the District Reorganization Act (Government Code Section 56000 et. seq.). The proposed reorganization has been assigned the title of Proposed Orange County District Reorganization No. 65. District No. 13 will include approximately 23,572 acres of largely undeveloped land. Of this total acreage, over 60 percent, or 14,300 acres, is designated as recreational and open space use. Approximately 2,177.74 acres of developed properties, or properties previously approved for development, will be removed from Districts Nos. 2 and 7 and transferred to the new District. . The proposed ultimate boundaries for the new District No. 13 are shown in Figure 3. The territories which will be detached from Districts No. 2· and No. 7 are listed in Table 1 and indicated in Figure 4 • 7 - ... - - - Source: LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES 8 Title: BOUNDARY MAP OF PROPOSED SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 ' ......... , .. ,, '"' .. : _..>"' ,. :r ,' . . . i ,'· 3 - , ~·~ ... \ .. ,I :-.:.. ~'l . • ::-' ; •' '· •· .r r···· '"\1 ~'.:, _; __ ,~---\~-~\~.:.--.. ,._.:,;_{;. ;· ~:;: ":.· ./ . 1,c!. < · "· ~ARY OP 'ANrrATION •• q.. ' .. :" ,---·4:.:-~~..,_.._,.. --~noN~O. ' • ·,·~• . ,.~ ... i, :.o. · • •!: ·· ··· ... · ..... ~ • • •,;. ' \. ' I .. •.'. ~ .. " I• •I •' ,;, "P'-'-......... -"! ~~ Source: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 9 \· \ ,: \ ... ""' ·'·· :·, I . ;\ I ' . ·;:· \ • # \ . .. /coN.Nectro~ ·Fee.7o"!s • . I . C . . SANITA~l~N DISTRICT NO. ,.1 a c ;. ., . \ \ ,_. · .. .. ·· .... " l ORANGI! COUNTY ;.·.; ... -· , ..... j ,, 1: ~ .\ s· T I A 1; o ·-·. ........ ,_ ,,.• tr I . o . 1000. . 4000 . IOOO ....... _ ... _ ....... -,'II( Title: DEVELOPMENTS TO BE DETACHED FROM DISTRICTS NO. 2 AND 7 AND OTHER APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS .. 'i•·· .. . '1 ~i 4 mi . - TABLE 1 PROPERTIES TO BE DETACHED FROM DISTRICT NO. 2 AND NO. 7 Annexation No. Maximum Developable Acres Lots District No. 2 21 Upper K Ranch 24* Tract 9813 28R Anaheim Hills No. 7 35** Bryant Ranch 47 Community College Annexation 52*** Tract 10144 55**** Mark III Homes 138.75 175.42 169.28 1348.60 177.82 335.20 265. 249 559 4105 Community College 420 District No. 7 *· ** *** **** 109 Community College 30.0 Community College TOTAL 2215.07 5598 Excludes Tract No's. 9955-58, 10265-67 and 10592 that were part of original annexation proposal. These tracts will be in District No .. 2. Excludes Tract No. 10504 that was part of original annexation proposal. This tract will be in District No. 2. Excludes Tract No. 11174 that was part of original annexation proposal. This tract will be in Distri~t No. 2. Excludes Tract No. 9927, Tract No. 10130 and Tract No. 10470 which will be in District No. 2. These properties together with the unincorporated terri- tories will form District No. 13. The Master Plan of Sewers ultimately considered the ap- proved and planned land uses within District No. 13 (see Figure 4). Table 2 indicates the projected land use assumptions and average sewage fl ow. 10 .... Land Use Residential ·Estate Density Low Density Medium Density High Density Commercial Recreational and O.S. Vacant (Fwy etc.) TOTAL TABLE 2 ULTIMATE LAND USE PLAN Acres 7,784 448 173 64 30 14,306 767 22,872 Sewage Flow Rate (gal/day/ac) 1,000 1,550 3,880 5,820 3,230 100 Projected Average Flow (MGD) 7.78 0.69 0.67 0.37 0.10 1.43 11.04 These projections represent approximately 25 ,273 dwelling units. and 326 ,700 square feet of commercial . use (see Figure 5). Sewage ·generated from these uses will be handled by facilities tributary to both Plant No. 1 and No. 2 (see Figure 6). The project does not involve the construction of new facilities. The properties within new District No. 13 will be served by acquisition of capacity in existing and future facilities of County Sanitation District trunk sewers 1, 2, 3, and 7, and jointly owned treatment plant facilities designed to serve the sewerage needs set forth in the approved General Plans of the tributary cities and the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange. All develop- ment within Sanitation District No. 13 has been or will be subject to specific environmental review and project constr~ction approval by the County of Orange or the city in which it will occur. Figure 6 i 11 ustrates the sewer system requirements . for . ultimate development of District No. 13. District No. 13 will. be required to buy a percentage of the system it uti 1 izes for sewage flow. The District's share of the costs for existing and new collec- tion facilities will be in. proportion to the ratio of their ultimate 11 I ~ ... flow projection over the design capacity of the facility. (see Appendix A). In addition, District No. 13 will participate in existing, as well as future joint works projects. This ratio is based on a three-year average of flow and assessed valuation. The existing and projected capital costs will be funded through a financial program implemented within District No. 13. The proposed method includes: 1) for new connections, collection of a one-time connection fee from each property owner on a per unit basis for residential development and on a floor space basis for corruner- cial/industrial development. The connection fees will be based upon the location of a particular development in relationship ·ta. three zones, Zone A, B and C. The zones a re shown in Figure 4. The connection fee for development in Zone A is $220 per dwelling unit or $45 per 1,000 square feet for industrial/commercial use. In addi- tion, a fee is charged on a per acre basis based on the fee amount that was established at the time the annexation was requested. These fees range from $1,138/acre to $1,616/acre depending upon when annexation .procedures were initiated. The acreage fees are in addition to the per dwelling unit or per square feet fee. The fees for Zone B. are $1,250 per dwelling unit or $250/1,000 square feet for industrial/commercial development. For Zone C the· fees are ·$1,500/ dwelling unit or $300/1,000 square feet for industrial/commercial use; and 2) collection of a yearly service fee from each user which will also be determined by the Board. New and existing capacity in collection and treatment facilities that would serve the proposed District No. 13 are included in the Master Plan of Sewers and would be provided regardless .of the formation of a new district. If no new district were formed, an identical infrastructure would be provided by Districts No. 2 and No. 7, in accordance with the Master Plan of Sewers. 12 I -. LOS ANOELES COUNTY CEG END - . I C==3 . RECREATI ON & OPEN SPACE 100 DRAINAGE BOUNO .yua' -. I• ---~~--- \ \~ \ Source: LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES I / l 3 Title : ULTIMATE LAND USE PLAN SANITATION DISTRICT NO. ULTIMATE LAND USE PLAN SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OAANOE CO UNTY Sell• CJiiiii~~~ .. --~' ~ zooo' •ooo• 1 000· FOR PROPOSED 13 5 .• J +' \.. ( ~ "'" ~ '. -) '\., LEGEND - 3 -. 2 - 0 .- 1 -INTERCEPTOR ( WITH CONTRACT NO. ) 8 AVERAGE UL TlllATE Sl!WAOI! 1.05 FLOWS (MOD) GENERATED BY DISTRICT NO. 13 / [--..., I DISTRICT NO. 13 __ ..,J . Source: . •. '- .-·.-.:... 't' ~~·. Title: }'.' ·.( .• · / . ·HIU.-=~.1' . ,,--~ ... ,,, ,. ' • ,.,..,, • # • ,,,. COLLECTION FACILITIES . UTILIZED BY DISTRICT NO. 13 \ .. ~· ·, ·. ~ ~· ' ·'t, . .,. ' "< '· . . No Seal• • ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS MASTER PLAN COLLECTION AND TREATMENT FACILITIES TO BE USED BY PROPOSED DISTRICT NO. 13 6 14 e. 2.0 OVERVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2.1 Existing Conditions The proposed District No. 13 is a 23,'572 acre area in northeast Orange County which is adjacent to the boundaries of Los Angeles, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. For the most part it includes undeveloped foothill areas of the Chino Hills and the Santa Ana Mountains. District No. 13 contains areas within the juris- dictions of the Cities of Yorba Linda, Anaheim, Brea, Orange, and the County of Orange. At present, there are eight developments amounting to ~2178 acres that a re either annexed to Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 and District No. 7 or are proposed for annexation for which service is being provided without ad valorem property tax revenue to the Sanitation Districts. The remainder of the project area, 21,394 acres is not annexed· to any District, and at present, is not deve 1 oped and no sewer service is being provided. The estimated total build-out (includes the already developed portions) of the entire area, which falls within the Master Plan of Sewers, is 25;273 residential units and 30 commercial ·acres. The existing and proposed sewage facilities included in the Master Plans are adequate to serve the area to be included in District No. 13. 2.2 Related Projects No projects have been identified which are related to the proposed project or which could result in a cumulative effect when combined with the proposed project. 15 : e 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT 3.1 Land Use 3.1.1 Inducement of Urban Growth Environmental Setting The 23 ,572 acre area is currently 91.8 percent undeveloped. New development will occur in this area regardless of formation of the new district. If District 13 is not approved, the sanitation needs of the area will be provided by Districts No. 2 and No. 7, through annex- ation. Annexation to Districts No. 2 and No. · 7 would require that special service agreements be signed or fee zon~s be formed to insure that the areas not providing property tax revenue will pay their fair share of collection and treatment costs. Project Impact Approval of the project, which includes the formation of District No. 13 and funding of the buy-in of existing and proposed facilities, .will facilitate the recovery of collection and treatment costs. The Orange County Sanitation Districts No. 2 and No. 7 will provide service to approved developments within the proposed District No. 13 area up to and including the development intensity as defined by the ultimate land use plan which includes 25,273 .dwelling units and. 326,700 square feet of commercial use if no new district is· formed. Approval of the project will provide a convenient and efficient method of providing the Districts a means to recover collection and treatment costs. Environmental impacts associated with development of the ultimate land use plans . for the area would occur regardless of the action taken on formation of the new district. Based on previous environmental documentation that ·has been prepared on proposed development projects within the area of the proposed District No. 13, the following environmental impacts might 16 •• - occur from those proposed developments in the ultimate land use plans approved by the cities and the County. The following environmental impacts are· not associated with the ·proposed formation of District No • 13, but are potential environmental impacts associated with projects proposed for the area within the boundary of District No. 13. Air Quality Geology Paleontology increased emissions would be generated from vehicle traffic in an area where no emissions are currently produced. -Development in an area where faults (the Whittier Fault transects a 1 arge portion of the area), landslides, slope instability and liquefaction potential exists. -Even though signific~nt paleontologic re- sources have not been found, some resources do exist within the area of proposed District No. 13. Grading could damage any resources, or if managed correctly, could recover important resources. Archaeological -Archaeological resources are known to exi~t within the area of proposed District No. 13, and could be damaged during grading operations that would occur after approval of tract development. Historical -Historic and cultural resources are known to exist within the area of proposed District No. 13 and could be disturbed during preparation of approved development sites. 17 Biological Hydrology/ Drainage and Flooding Circulation Noise -Development of previously undisturbed lands results in impacts to biological resources which are irreversible and permanent. The degree of significance is based on whether the biological resources include "endangered species. 11 There a re no known endangered species within the area to be included in Proposed District No. 13. -Surface drainage of developed property gener- ally increases by slightly less than double over undeveloped properties. Natural drainage courses exist throughout the proposed Dis- trict. Development in this area could impact these drainage courses. There are areas within the proposed District No. 13 which could be subject to severe flooding. -Development of. the Ultimate Land Use. Plan would result in 25,273 dwelling unit~ and 326,700 square feet of commercial use or approximately 279,519 vehicle trips* dis- tributed throughout the area. The only known existing major noise source within the Proposed District No. 13 is that produced by the railroad through Santa Ana Canyon. Development of the Ultimate Land * Includes existing development identified in Table 1. Total vehicle trips are based on 10' trips/day/dwelling unit and 82 trips/day/1000 square feet of cormnercial use. · 18 - .... . Energy Public Utilities Water Supply Use Plan would result in the generation of additional vehicle trips which would increase noise levels in the area of proposed District No. 13. -Development of the Ultimate Land Use Plan would result in. the use of .non-renewable energy resources in the form of natural gas and oil for electricity, etc. The deve 1 op- ments will have to conform to regulations establishing energy conservation standards for new residential an·d non-residential buildings, effective July 13, 1982. An estimated con- sumption of .42 million KWH daily and 7.9 million cubic feet of natural gas daily is projected for ultimate development of the Land Use Master Plans.* -Water is a natural resource which, for the most part, has to be purchased in Southern California. Development of the. Ultimate Land Use Plan may impact water availability. An estimated consumptio~ ~f approximately 6.35 million gallons of water per day is projected at full development. Sewage Disposal -The Orange County Sanitation Districts Master Plan of Sewers is designed to accommodate development up to that proposed in the Ulti- mate Land Use Plans of the various responsible agencies in the area. The planned development * Includes existing developments identified in Table 1. 19 Telephone Electrical Gas of 25,273 dwelling units and 326,700 square feet of commercial use will not adversely impact the system. An estimated flow of 6.14 MGD is projected at full development. The Pacific Te 1 ephone and Te 1 egraph, in accordance with the requirements of California Public Utilities Commission, will provide service to development within the proposed District No. 13. Impacts associated with the construction of utility lines may ·occur. The Southern California Edison Company, in accordance with the requirements of the Public Utilities Commission, will provi~e service to development within the proposed District No. 13 which will result in the irretrievable commitment of non-renewab 1 e energy resource. An estimated consumption of .428 mill ion KWH daily is projected for development of the Ultimate Land Use Plans.* -The Southern California Gas Company, in accordance with the requirements of the Public Utilities Commission, will provide service to development within the pr~posed District No. 13 which will result in the irretrievable commitment of non-renewable energy resources. An estimated consumption of 7.9 million cubic feet of natural gas daily is projected for development of the Ultimate Land Use Plans.* * Includes existing devel6pments identified in Table 1. 20 Community Services Solid Waste -Development of the Ultimate Land Use Plan will Fire · Protection Pol ice . Protection Schools reduce the available capacity of the existing landfills, may necessitate creation of new landfills or alternate methods of county disposal facilities. An estimated generation of 203,663 pounds of solid waste is projected for development of the Ultimate Land Use Plans.* Much of the 1 and area within the p~oposed District No. 13 is considered an "Extreme Fire Haza rd Area. 11 Deve 1 opment of the area wi 11 have an impact on the fire protection facili~ ties in the servicing· communities. -Development of the Ultimate Land Use Plans will increase the demand on existing police facilities in the servicing communities and may necessitate new facilities. Fu 11 deve 1 opment may exceed the capacity of the existing servicing school districts and additional classrooms or new facilities m.ay be required. Howeve·r, it should be noted that in many districts in the area of proposed Dis- trict No. 13, enrollment is declining. * Includes existing developments identified in Table 1. 21 ... •• Recreation -Development of the Ui timate Land Use Pl ans will increase the demand on existing park and recreational facilities in the servicing communities and may necessitate the creation of new facilities. Reorganization of Districts No. 2 and No. 7, and the for- . mation of District 13, will not affect the magnitude of the impacts described. Planned growth in the area is controlled by the responsible agencies {city and county governments) who have jurisdiction ·over specific portions of the area proposed for inclusion in the new dis- trict. Identical sewage facilities with sufficient capacity to accom- · modate planned development would be provided with, or without, reorgan- ization and formation of the new district. Formation of the new district will cause no physical changes in the kind or amount of .treatment and collection facilities constructed in the area. The pr:-oposed action will not impact the quality or quantity of sewage generated in the area, or delivered to the District's treatment facil- ities. The reorganization and new district formation will only ·have administrative and organizational effects. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are necessary since the proposed action will not create or change land use impacts in the a~fected area, or other areas. 22 i ! .... - ... ~- w!!' . 3~2 Population Environmental Setting At present, the area which would form proposed District No. 13 is largely undeveloped. The exceptions to this are the existing developments identified in Table 1. Together, these developments, and planned development represent 25,273 dwelling units and a population of 76,189. Project Impact Approval of the project, which includes the formation of District No. 13 an·d funding of the buy-in of existing and proposed facilities, will not affect growth. The Orange County Sanitation D'istricts. will provide service to approved developments within the proposed District No. 13 area up to and including the development intensity as defined by the ultimate land use plans which includes 25 ,273 dwe 11 i ng uni ts. Service wi 11 be provided whether or not the proposed reorganization and new district formation is approved. The estimated population which could ultimately be generated by total buildout· would be 76,189 persons.* An increase in the growth rate from zero .Percent to an average of 5.6 percent per year over a 20-y.ear period i's antici.pated. The SCAG population forecas~d growth for this 20-year period is 93,000 persons; therefore, buildout of the ultimate land use plans is within the projected growth of the area.** ·Mitigation Measures Reorganization of Districts No. 2 and No. 7, and formation of District 13, will have no impact on growth in the affected area. No mitigation measures are required. * Includes existing development identified in Table I. ** Southern California Association of Governments -82 Population Forecast, RSA 41, adopted September 2, 1982. 23 4.0 4.1 .. LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of Man's Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity . The action is designed to provide a means by which the Orange County Sanitation District can finance service to existing and proposed development occurring subsequent to the tax initiativ·e approved June 7, 1978. The. action has no short or long-term effect on man's environment as it is an action relating only to the creation of jurisdict1onal boundaries. The action 6nly affects the admini.stration of wastewater management, .and not the quantity and qualjty of wastewater generated.or collection and treatment facilities required. 24 ... 4.2 Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would Be Involved in the Proposed Project if it is Implemented Approval and implementation of the formation. of Sanitation Dis~rict No. 13 would not result in any irreversible environmental changes. Planned development will be accommodated with or without the prepared reorganization and new district formation. Discretionary actions relating to planned development are made under the authority of City and County agencies, and impacts resulting from these actions will be reviewed in environmental documentation prepared by those agencies • 25 .... - 4.3 . The Growth-Inducing Impact of the Proposed Action The proposed project will have no growth inducing impacts. The reorganization of Districts No. 2 and No. 7 and formation of District 13, will neither facilitate nor .impede development in the affected area. The formation of District No. 13 area will acconunodate .development of approximately 25,273 dwelling units* and 326,700 square feet of commercial use ii1 accord with the Ultimate Land Use Plans. The potential employment growth resulting from this development wou.ld. be approximately 10,800. jobs. Projected population growth from these develop~ents would be.approximately 76,189 pe~sons.* Proposed District No. 13 is in Regional Statistical Area 41, Santa Ana Canyon. The housing growth forecast is estimated at 40,000 dwelling units between 1980 and 2000. Development consistent with the Ultimate Land Use ·Pl ans would represent approximately 63 percent of this projected growth.* The employment growth forecast is estimated at 29,000 jobs between 1980 and 2000. Development consistent with the Ultimate Land Use Plans would represent approximately 37 percent of the projected growth.* The population growth forecast is estimated at 93,000 persons between 1980 and 2000. Development consistent with the Ultimate Land Use Plans would represent approximately 82 percent of this projected growth.* * Includes existing development identified in Table 1. 26 - .... - 5.0 IMPACTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT Certain environmental impacts were not determined significant enough for analysis in this EIR. This determination was made in the Initial Study, which is included in Section 2.0. Those impacts not designated for discussion are determined insignificant because of the nature of the project • 27 i I' ~@ w l.~/_,) I I ·.~ i:..J· •, i . L.J . ~ ·. ·J I ! u : I l.J ! I i:.J 6.j. 6.0 CUMULATIVE: IMPACTS Approval and implementation of the proposed District No. 13 would not result in any cumulative impact. 28 ... ... - 7.0 SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES No mitigation measures a re required for the project and no en vi ronmenta l impacts a re anticipated as a result of approval of the project. However, significant environmental impacts could occur as a result of the development which is planned for the area. These poten- tial .impacts will be the result of discretionary action by other agen- cies, and will not occur because of project approval •. Cumulative impacts will also occur from development of the Ultimate Land Use Plans. Individual development impacts and cumulative impacts will be identified and their mitigation measures discussed on a case-by-case basis in environmental documentation prepared by the lead agencies responsible for individual project approval . 29 ... ... .... - - ... 8~0 UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS CEQA and its associated guidelines [California Administrative Code Section 15143 (b)] states that an EIR must describe any signifi- cant impacts which cannot be avoided or totally eliminated if the project is implemented • There are no unavoidable adverse impacts resulting from the proposed action. The proposed action will only impact the adminis- tration of sewage treatment and collection in the area • 30 .. - .. - 9.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION 9.1 No Project or Postponement In consideration of possible alternatives to any given action, one course which is both logical and mandated by applicable guidelines is the 11 no project or postponement alternative. · This alternative would prevent the formation of a new Sanitation District. The developments identified in Table 1 would remain annexed to Sanita- tion Districts No. 2 and No. 7. The approved developments identified in Table 2 would annex to Districts No. 2 or No. 7 to obtain sewer· service and would pay connection fees and service fees to those districts. New development applications· in the area of proposed District No. 13 would be annexed to Districts No. 2 or No. 7 and service would be provided. Sanitation District No. 2 and No. 7 would establish fee zones to provide revenue in lieu of ad valorem property taxes • 9.2. Alternative to form a Sanitation Distric·t Independent of the Orange County Sanitation District's Facilities A new and separate Sanitation District could be formed by new developments requiring sewer service. However, trunk sew~r lines would have to be installed and treatment facilities would have to be built. Treatment facilities can be built to handle as few ~s 300 homes. Formation of the new district would require approval from ·Local Agency Formation Commission and the Orange County Board of Supervisors. This alternative would result in an independent sani- tation. district that would not be a part of the Orange County Sani- tation Districts, and would be unable to share in the Districts' collection and treatment facilities. 31 .... ... - ... .... - Impacts resulting from construction of trunk lines, treatmen~ facilities, and effluent disposal cannot be quantified without devel- oping site specific details. Generally, the impacts resulting from this alternative would be of greater magnitude and.severity· than those associated with the proposed action. While the project, as defined, is without significant adverse impacts, this alternative would result in additional construction of facilities, probable changes in effluent· quality,. changes in effluent disposal requirements, and secondary impacts such as traffic and circulation disruption during construction, and air quality impacts. 9.3 Alternative Treatment of Sewage Development' of the area could continue by utilization of septic tan~ systems. However, soil testing for percolation capabili- ties would be required prior to developmental approval ~o assess feasibility ·of such systems. Geological conditions can vary such that the feasibility of septic tanks can be questionable for development within 1000 feet of each other. Large scale use of septic tanks can have detrimental effects on public health and on ground water quality • 9.4 Annex Entire Unannexed Area to District No.7 or · District No. 2 The entire unannexed areas which are proposed for inclusion in District 13 could be annexed to a contiguous District. Areas presently within Districts No. 2 and No. 7 that are proposed for detachment and inclusion in District No. 13 would remain in their present District. This alternative would require that Districts No.· 2 and.No. 7 es~ablish fee zones or service agreements for the newly annexed areas, and the areas proposed for detachment, to recover capital and operating costs. Physical impacts resulting from this alternative would be no different than the proposed project. 32 - ·r-• ·~·i· ~@r.asys. -'--· ·- - - .. 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED LAFCO Ultrasystems Lowry and Associates Orange County Environmental Health .33 Kenneth W. Scattergood, Administrative Assistant Phil Martin Senior Project_Manager Michae 1 Swan John Byers 11.0 ·- - ..... - REFERENCES Environmental Documentation Travis Ranch Draft EIR Tentative Tracts 10,000 and 10,002 Shorb Rivas Draft EIR Tentative Tract 10144 Domingas Ranch Draft EIR Tentative Tract 9813 Bryant Ranch Draft EIR Upper K Ranch Draft EIR Santa Ana River Intercepter Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue Environmental Assessment Santa Ana River Interceptor of County Sanitation District N·o. 2 Environmental Assessment Public Documents Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Southern California Association of Governments Growth Forecast Policy, adopted September 2, 1982 • 34 l r. ; l - ! I . ~r. l . i-1 ~- i i ! I. ~ ' j .I I. '-' . ·. :' w · 1 I w· i i '-'' ·J u APPENDICES , I I ~ . i ~· ' \ ~ ' I ! I ... .. J. ) ; ~ . I ; ! -' ; I ~ I .·~ J APPENDIX A INITIAL STUDY -T "" . ... INITIAL STUDY (To Be Completed by Lead Agency) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P. 0. SOX B127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Background A . Name of Proponent County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B. Address and Phone Number of Proponent P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 C. Contact Person Hilary.J. Baker, Senior Engineering Aide o. Title and Location of Project Formation of Sanitation District No. 13; Northeastern Orange County, bordered on the north bY Los Angeles County line, on the east by San Bernardino and Riverside County lines, on the south by the Orange County portion of the Santa Ana Mountains and on the west by the communities of Brea, Yorba Linda, Anaheim and Orange. E. Description of Project Formation of a new Sanitation District to provide fin,ncial fr~mework to pay the cost of providina sewage service to properties within the area. Does not involve construction , .of new facilities, only the acquisition of capacity in existing and future facilities. - - ·-. I .. - i I . Gui de 1 i nes A. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 28. Yes x No ----- (rf activity does not qualify as project, do ~Qt complete remainder of form.) . 8. · Does the project qualify as: , Ministerial (Section 6) Yes . No .x •• "' Emergency (Section 13) Yes No x (_ . 3. A .feasibility or planning study (Section 33) Yes No X '1 • Categorically exempt pursuant to Article a of the State Guidelines (Section 40) Yes No x 5. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency ( Sect i on 3 6 ) Yes No X I f yes , i dent i f y 1 ea d agency : (!f yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report .or Negative Declaration need not be prepared.) · III. Environmental Impacts (2xp1anations of ail "..Yesi• and "maybe" ans·,.yers are required ·an attached sheets.) A. Earth. ~ill the proposal result in: 1. 2. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering cf the soil? 3. .Ch.ange in ·topography or ground surf ace relief features? 4. The destruction, covering or modification Yes of any unique geologic or physical features? -- 5. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? -2- :-.1aybe No x x x x x - ... .. -- 6. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands or changes in si1ation, aeposition or erosion which may modify the channel .of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet er lake? i. ~xposure o~ people or property to geological hazards such as earthquakes, landslides; mudslides, ground failure or similar hazard? 8. Air .. · 1tii1l the proposal result in: 1. 2. 3 . Substantial air emissions or deteriora- tion of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? C. Water. '..Ji 11 the propos a 1 result in: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Changes in currents or the course of direction of water movements in either marine or fresh water? Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surf ace runoff? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding, but not limited to, temperature, dissol~ed oxygen or turbidity? 6. Alteration of the direction or rat~ .of flow of ground waters? 7. Change in the quantity of ground water~, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- Yes Maybe No x x x x x x x x x x x x .. - - 8. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise avai1able for pubiic ·water supplies? 9. Exposure of people or property to related hazards such as flooding or tidal wave~? 0. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: c: I.. • 1. Change in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aauatic plants)? 2. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? 3 •. rntroduction of new species of plants into an area or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 4. R~duction in acreage of any agriculture crop? Animal Life. Will the pr~posa1 result in: 1. 2. 3. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals includina reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of anirna1s? Introduction of new species of animals into .an area or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? Deterioration to existing fish or ~ildlife habitat? F. Noise. Will the proposal result in: G. 1. 2. Increase in existing noise levels? Exposure of people to sev~re noise levels? Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or g1are? -4- Yes Maybe x x x x x x x x x x x x .X -H. -I. - , ,_. u. 'wt· ~ .._ K. -L. .. M. L~nd Use. Wi 11 the proposal result in a substantial alteration 'Jf the present or planned 1 and use of an area? Natura 1 Resources. '/Ji 11 the proposal result in: 1. Increase in the rate of use of any natura·l resources? 2. Substantiai depletion of any non- rene 1i'lat) 1 e natural resource? Risk of Upset. ',.Ji 11 the proposal involve: 1. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, 0 i 1 , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an ace i dent or upset conditions? 2. Possible interf~rence 'Ni th an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation p 1 an.? Popu 1 at ion. · Wi 11 the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of .the human population of an .area? Housing. ',.Ji 11 the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additicnal housing? Transoortation/Circulation. '..Ji 11 the proposal result ; n: 1. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? 2. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? 3. Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems? · 4. Alterations to present patterns of circulation rir movement of people and/or goods? 5. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? -5- Yes Malbe No x x x x x x x x x x x . x •• 6. rnc;ease in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? • N. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the • f o 11 owing areas: ... 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public faci 1 ities, ·in- cluding roads? Other governmental services? O. Energy. Will the proposal result in: 1. Use cf substantial amounts of fuel or energy? 2.-Substantial increase in demand upon eiisting sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? P. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilit"ies? 1. 2. 3. 4. ,. ::> • 6. Power or natural gas? Communications systems? 'Aater? Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? Solids waste and disposal? Q. Human Health. ~ill the proposal result in: 1. Creation of any health haz~rd or potent~al he~lth hazard (excluding mental health)? -6- Yes ~a'!be x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x - 2. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? R. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstrtiction of any scenic vista or view open to the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? S. Recreation. ~ill the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of ·existing recreational opportunities? · T. Cultural Resources. l. .Will the proposal result.in the alteration of o~ the destruction of a prehistoric or historic ·archaeological site? 2. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? 3. Does the proposal have the potential to ca~se a physical change which would affect unique ethnic culturai values? Will the· proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the pot anti a 1 impact area? U. M~ndatory Findi~gs of Significance. 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a · fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare·or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? -i- Yes Maybe No x x x x x. x x x ··--·- 2. Ooe·s the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, de- finitive period of time, while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulative con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact. on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is s_i gn if i cant.) 4. Does the project have environmental. effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly 6r indirectly? IV. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation See attached sheet . Yes .._ v. Discussion of Zoning Compatibility .. \ I - See attached sheet. VI. ·Determination (To be completed by Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initfal evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION wi·ll be prepared . I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: August 18, 1983 Maybe No x x x D D Harper, General Mana r ATTACHMENT . _ 1I I. . -·· ·_Env ironm~rita 1 Impacts ., -. - ~· I .. Item K. The proposal may alter the distribution of humah population within the area, hciwever, it is unlikely. The Sanitation Districts are a single- s~rvice ·agency and ·only provide sewer service to accommodate growth outlined in the City and County General Plans. All existing or pro- posed projects in the area have been or will be required to provide adequate environmental documentation on an individual project basis. Item L. The proposal will allow properties to connect to a sewerage facility. It should be noted that all developments connect to the local sewering agency facilities, which, in turn, connect to the Districts' trunk sewer facilities. The proje.ct does not involve the construction of new faci- lities, only the acquisition of capacity in existing and future facilities. I tern u .. 4 .. Indirectly, the project will accommodate growth allowed by the Cities and County within the District boundaries. All impacts for individual projects wi 11 be addressed in specific· project E IR 1 s. \ I -~ : r . - , I i.J I J. I, I, w .. ' ! ··U I r w· APPENDIX B FORMATION COST ANALYSIS ,j d I ~ ·l.i J I ~ I r..J ~ J ·.; ., \ b!) I j ~ ..; I '1 u. I I t.J , I ~ \ I ~ ~ I I '9J : (.J FORMATION COST ANALYSIS FOR SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA JUNE 1984 PREPARED FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PREPARED BY LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES TABLE 5 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 13 FACILITIES COST SHARE Existing Collection Facilities Existing Joint Works Facilities Formation Expenses Subtotal Existing Future Collection Facilities Future Joint Works Facilities Subtotal Future Grand Total 16 TOTAL DISTRICT 13 $ 7,329,043 12,929,976 100,000 $20, 359, 019 $ 4,742,833 4,564,615 $ 9,307,448 $29,666,467 UNIT COST $1,844,114/mgd $ 843,066/mgd $2,687,180/mgd -revenues. The remaining necessary capacity can be purchased in the future when development levels warrant additional capacity. Future connection and acreage fee revenues should be used to fund District No. 13's share of additional capacity in existing and proposed future collection and joint works facilities. .. .... - 17 - -' TABLB l .... SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 COLLECTION FACILITIES TRIBUTARY '1'0 PLAN'!' NO. 1 -BNR20 =3870 (Aug. 1982) -DISTRICT NO. 13 OLTIMATB SBWAGB FACILITY PACILITIBS PLOW COST DISTRICT NO. 13 SllARB (mgd) ($) (%) ($) New PiJ2!: Carbon Canx:on Interce2tor .... Tunnel Alternative 2.02 3,655,000 63.2 2,309,960 Carbon CanI2n Interceetor Existing 21• to Camden 2.02 1,343,322 34.1 458,073 -Camden to Sta. 100+36 2.02 577,758 9.0 51,998 Sta. 100+36 to c.c. Channel 2.02 1,171,253 7.0 81,988 c.c. Channel to Sta. 27+46 2.02 1,443,617 8.4 121,264 Sta. 27+46 to Grove 2.02 1,275,826 6.7 85i480 SUBTOTAL 7-98,803 --Richfield Sub-Trunk .. Orangethorpe to 33• Stub 0.17 762,850 2.7 20,597 42• to S.A.R.I. 0.17 11,975 3.4 407 SUBTOTAL 21,004 -Kell299 Sub-Trunk Orangethorpe to 250' South 0.29 41,474 2.6 1,078 250' south to s.A.R.I. 0.29 303,438 4.0 12,138 SUBTOTAL 13,216 New PiJ2!: ImJ2!rial H!X• Orangethorpe to LaPalma 0.58 150,000 17.6 26,400 New PiJ2!: Parallel Taft Branch Meats to Taft and Tustin 0.24 2500 L.P. of 2i in. 423,000 12.3 52,029 -Tustin to Sta. 20+50 0.24 438,557 10.4 45,610 3000 L.F. of 18 in. Sta. 20+50 to Batavia 0.24 881, 793 9.0 79,361 5200 L.F. of 21 in. Batavia to S.A.R.I. 0.24 555,000 2.1 11,655 2SDO L.F. of 27 in. Connection Structure 0.24 87,711 2.1 li842 SUBTOTAL 190,497 ... ... .. .. .. ... - ... - TABLB 1 iContinued! DISTRICT NO. 13 ULTIMATE SBWAGB FACILITY PACILITIBS PLOW COST DISTRICT NO. 13 SBARB (mgd) ($) (t) ($) New Pipe: Parallel south Santa Ana River Interce2tor Solomon to Imperial Hwy. o.58 280,000 100* 280,000 2400 L.P. of 15 in. south Santa Ana River Interce2tor Santa Ana Cyn. Rd. to B/O Durango 1.22 60,000 42.8 25,680 B/O Durango to B/O Palmera 1.22 349,565 28.8 100,675 B/O Palmera to Solomon 1.22 123,770 21.4 26,487 Solomon to Imperial Hwy .64 161,108 10.2* 16,433 S/O Pwy. to La Palma 1.22 632,456 17.2 1081782 SUBTOTAL 278,057 Santa Ana River Interce2tor lS.A.R.I.! B/0 Gypsum Cyn. Rd. to Sta. 1071 0.26 1,815,764 1.2 21,789 Sta. 1071 to Sta. 991 0.67 2,328,074 3.4 79,155 -- Sta. 991 to Sta. 913+50 3.50 2,688,953 13.3 357,631 Sta. 913+50 to Sta. 893 4.05 625,385 14.5 90,681 Sta. 893 to Imperial Hwy. 4.05 1,634,958 14.8 241,974 Imperial Hwy. to Sta. 778+32 5.85 2,224,545 20.0 444,909 Sta. 778+32 to Richfield 6.14 1,697,073 25.0 424,268 Richfield to Sta. 678+06 6.31 2,110,698 18.l 382,036 Sta. 678+06 to Sta. 596 8.33 1,913,678 9.2 176,058 Sta. 596 to AT&SP RR 8.57 3,024,131 6.1 184,472 AT&SP to Plant No. 1 8.57 17,013,396 5.1 8671683 SUBTOTAL 3,270,656 S.A.R.I. SYSTEM TOTAL 7,188,593 New Pil?!I Chapnan B/O Newport to· sandy Creek 1.76 178,000 100 178,000 1500 L.P. of is• Bandy Creek Chapnan to Amapola 1.76 28,395 88.9 25,243 Amapola to S/O Mead 1.76 37,125 71.S 261544 SUBTOTAL 51,787 • o.58 mgd iaverage) is carried by the new pipe and 0.64 mgd by the existing section for a total of 1.22 mgd. TABLB l (Continued) DISTRICT NO. 13 ... ULTIMATE SBWAGB PACILI'rY FACILITIES FLOW COST DISTRICT NO. 13 SEIARB (mgd) ($) (%) ($) New Pie!: Band!; Creek S/O Mead to Orange Park 1.76 469,000 65.7 308,133 -2700 L.P. of 21• Santiago Cl!l• Rd. Trunk Clark to Linda Vista 1.76 207,933 60.3 125,384 .. Tustin-Orange Linda vista to Santiago Blvd. 1.76 68,065 60.3 41,043 Sanitago Blvd. to Earlham 1.76 634,271 45.l 286,056 -Barlham to N/O Cranbrook 1.76 891,128 30.9 275,359 N/O Cranbrook.to S.A. Pwy. 1.76 1,324,341 27.9 369,491 S.A. Pwy. to Red Hill 1.76 380,227 18.9 711863 SUBTOTAL 1,043,812 Red Bill Relief Trunk --Mitchell to AT &SP RR 1.76 397,881 15.4 61,274 AT &SP RR to Bell 1.76 777,063 10.9 84,700 -SUBTOTAL 145,974 Red Bill Interceptor ... Bell to McGaw 1.76 1,228,384 8.1 99,499 McGaw to Sunflower 1.76 2,092,703 5.0 104,635 Sunflower to Main 1.76 513,132 3.3 161933 SUBTOTAL 221,067 Sunflower Interceptor Main to Bear 1.76 3,307,045 3.1 102,518 Bear to Plant No. l 1.76 5,897,346 2.5 1471434 SUBTOTAL 249,952 TUSTIN-ORANGE SYSTEM TOTAL 2,324,109 - EXISTING PACILITIES TOTAL 6,219,712 NBW FACILITIES 'l'OTAL 312921990 TRIBUTARY TO PLANT NO. l GRAND TOTAL 9,512,702 - TABLB 2 SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 COLLECTION FACILITIES TRIBOTARY TO PLANT NO. 2 ... EHR@ • 3870 (Aug. 1982) ... DISTRICT NO. 13 ULTIMATB SEWAGE FACILITY FACILITIES PLOW COST DISTRICT NO. 13 SBAU (mgd) ($) <•> ($) ... New PiJi!!!: Parallel Pullerton-Brea Brea to Rolling Bills P.s. 0.71 565,873 9.7 54,890 2850 L.P. of 30 and 24 in. a.a. P.S. to N/O Panorama 0.71 1,111,850 13.4 148,988 6860 L.F. to 21 in. N/O Panorama to Lemon 0.71 477,681 11.9 56,844 2590 L.P. of 24 in. Lemon to aosslynn 0.71 2,149,481 9.4 202,051 9960 L.P. of 24 and 30 in. Rosslynn to Jefferson 0.71 1,529,115 5.2 79,514 SUBTOTAL 542,287 -- Orangethorpe Jefferson to Brookhurst 0.71 359,741 9.4 33,816 New PiJi!!!: Orangethor2! Brookhurst to Magnolia 0.71 1,025,000 15.3 156,825 5300 L.P. of 24 in. Magnolia to Western 0.71 1,360,000 27.8 378,080 8000 L.P. of 21 in. SUB'l'O'l'AL 534,905 Orangethorl!! Relief western to Knott 0.71 888,422 2.9 25,764 Knott Interceetor Orangethorpe to Lincoln 0.71 5,830,798 1.8 104,954 Lincoln to Katella 0.71 7,552,465 1.4 105,735 Katella to Westminster 0.71 8,892,059 1.2 106,705 Westminster to Newland 0.71 8,607,175 o.9 77 ,465 Bolsa to~rookhurst 0.71 13,173,142 0.6 79,039 SUBTOTAL 473,898 EXISTING PACILITIES TOTAL 533,478 -NEW FACILITIES TOTAL 1,077,192 TRIBUTARY TO PLANT NO. 2 GRAND TOTAL l,610,670 -It .... ... . Bi DRAFT FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROJECT: Formation of Sanitation District No. 13 · Applicant: Orange County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley CA 92708 June 1984 - .... 4116 - - SCREEN CHECK EIR (SUBMITTED ) DRAFT EIR (ACCEPTED --------) PROPOSED FINAL EIR (APPROVED ) FINAL EIR (CERTIFIED COMPLETED ON ) STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER: 82082005 FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR.THE FORMATION OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 AND RELATED FISCAL AGREEMENTS Pre pa red by: ULTRASYSTEMS, INC. 16845 Von Karman Avenue Irvine, California 92714 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 JUNE 1984 ... - - . _. - - - Section 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •••••••••.•••••••••••••••.••.•••••.••• 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ••.•••..•••••••...•.•..••••••••••••• 4 1.1 Location and Boundaries ••••••••••••••••••••••••.•• 4 1.2 Statement of Objectives ••••••••••••••..••••••.•••• 4 1.3 Project Characteristics ••.••••••••••••••••••....•• 7 2.0 OVERVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING •••••••••.•••.•••• 15 2.1 Existing Conditions ••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 15 2.2 Related Projects •••••.••••••...••••••••••.•••••..• 15 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ••.••••••• 16 3.1 Land Use ••••.•••••••..••••••••••••••••....•••.••••• 16 3.1.1 Inducement of Urban Growth •.••••••••.••••••• 16 3.2 Populatibn ••••••••••••••••••••••••.•..••••••••.••• 23 4.0 LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ••.•..••• 24 5.0 4.1 The Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of Man's Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • • . • • • • . • . • . • • 24 4.2 Irreversible Environmental Changes ••.•••••••••••••• 25 4.3 The Growth-Inducing Impact of the Proposed Action ····················~·············· 26 IMPACTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT ••••••.•..•••••••..• 27 6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS .•••••.•.••••.••••••••••..••••.•..••• 28 7.0 SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES •...•••••••.•.•..••.•.•.. 29 a.a· UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS ...••••••.•••••••.•.•.•••••..• 30 i - - - - Section 9.0 10.0 · Tab 1 e of Contents -Continued Page ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ...................... 32 9.1 No Project or Postponement ••••••••.•••••••••••••••• 32 9.2 Alternatives to the Formation of Sanitation District No. 13. • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 32 9.3 Alternative Treatment of Sewage •••••••••.••••••••. 33 9.4 Arinex Entire Unannexed Area to District No. 7 or District No. 2 ••••••••••••.•••.•••••••••••••••• 33 ORGAN.IZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSUL TED • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 34 11.0 REFERENCES ·~··········································· 35 ·APPENDICES Appendix A -Initial Study Appendix B -Formation Cost Analysis Appendix C -Responses to the Notice of Preparation Appendix D -Statement of Costs ii .. i~·) _@ LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page ..J 1 REGIONAL MAP ••••••••••••••••••••••.••.• ~ •••••••••••••• 5 2 SPHERES OF INFLUENCE •..•••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••• 6 3 BOUNDARY MA~ OF PROPOSED SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 •• ·8 4 DEVELOPMENTS TO BE DETACHED FROM DISTRICTS NO. 2 '-' AND 7 AND OTHER APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS •••••.•.•••••••• 9 5 ULTIMATE LAND USE PLAN FOR PROPOSED SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 ••.••••••••••••••.•••••.••.••••••••••• 13 6 MASTER PLAN COLLECTION AND TREATMENT FACILITIES TO BE USED BY PROPOSED DISTRICT NO. 13 ..................... 14 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 PROPERTIES TO BE DETACHED FROM DISTRICT NO. 2 AND NO. 7 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••.• 10 2 ULTIMATE LAND USE PLAN •••••••.••••.•••••••••..••••••• 11 ... - -iii I ._ .. wt• INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been pre- pared for use by the Orange County Sanitation Districts, affected public agencies and the general public for evaluation of the proposed reorganization of Sanitation Districts No. 2 and No. 7, and the for- mation of Sanitation District No. 13. The Draft EIR h~s been prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines as amended July 16, 1983. This EIR will focus on anticipated environmental i'ssues and concerns, that may result from approval of proposed District No. 13. This Envi ronmenta 1 Impact Report is being prepared for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. Consultant costs are based on time and materials, not to exceed $8,174. Background of the Project The Orange County Sanitation Districts have historically provided sewer service, ~ewage treatment and maintenance of facilities from funds received by property tax allocation. Subsequent to the passage and enactment of the tax initiative measure on June 7, 1978, the Sanitation Districts no longer· receive funds from property tax allocations on new developments annexing to the Districts for service. When the Districts determined they would not receive funds from four developments already annexed and would not receive funds from six other approved developments awaiting annexation, they beg.an negotiations with the Orange County Board of Supervisors concerning - - - .. annexations to the Sanitation Districts. The negotiations were de- signed to give the decision makers an opportunity to work out an equitable alternative to sewer service and facility funding under ABB.* It has been decided that the Sanitation Districts' objective would be accomplfshed by formation of the new· district that would include 1) developm~nts in Districts No. 2 and No. 7 presently annexed but not contributing funds to the Districts, 2} approved developments awaiting annexation to District No. 2 or No. 7, .. and 3) future adjacent developments. There are other areas outside the Sanitation District boundaries that will eventually need annexation. The formation of District 13 will provide sewer service only to the areas within the boundaries of District 13 and will not resolve all annexation problems of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following identified land use and population impacts are associated with developments that have been approved by local agencies and are not associated with the proposed formation of District No. 13 by the Orange County Sanitation Districts. * Assembly Bill B (ABB) allows an agency to negotiate with the County Board of Supervisors to obtain a share of the one percent ad valorem Property Tax, but does not require the County to share the tax revenue • 2 - .... - . i ... - Project Impacts · 3 .1 Land Use Continued development in the District 13 area will ·result in significant land use impacts. Since the area is included in the Orange County Sanitation Districts Master Plan, and will receive sewage collection and treat- ment either from Districts 2 or 7, or from the new District 13, project approval has no impact on land use. 3.2 Population Mitigation Measures Mitigation measures· cannot be identified at this time, but environmental review and analysis by the appropriate land agency, on a case by case basis would insure identification and mitigation of any significant impacts associated with developmental approv- als. An anticipated growth Same as above rate from zero to 5.6 percent per year over a 20-year period is antici- pated. ·This is within th~ estimated population growth forecasted for the area between 1980 and 2000, and would occur with or with- out formation of District 13 • 3 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts No unavoidable adverse impacts have been identified. None have been ident- ified. 8' i~ ·, ~J'S~ -"t~Y I - - 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.1 Location and Boundaries The project area 1 ies in northeastern O~ange County as shown in Figure 1. The proposed project area will constitute Dis- trict No. 13. The proposed District is bordered on the north by the Los Angeles County line, on the east by the San Bernardino and . Riverside County line., on the south by the Orange County portion of the Santa Ana Mountains and on the west by the Orange County commun- ities of Brea, Yorba Linda, Anaheim, and Orange. The project is also within the sphere of influence of the Irvine Ranch Water District .. .. The Cities' spheres of influence are .delineated on Figure 2. • 1.2 Statement of Objectives ~ .. The Orange County Sanitation Districts are proposing the formation of a new Sanitation District (District No. 13) for the purpose of providing service 1) to areas which are not presently annexed to any Sanitation District but are within the proposed service area as ·shown on the District's Master Plan of Sewers, and 2) those properties within the proposed service ·area which have been annexed to Districts No. 2 and No. 7 subsequent to June 7, 1978, and are receiving service but are not contributing financially through taxes for the service or facilities. The purpose of District No. 13 is to provide a separate entity through which wastewater transportation, treatment and dis- posal service will be furnished and financed for properties within the proposed District. Pursuant to a negotiated settlement with the County of Orange, no ad valorem tax monies from these properties will be allocated to the Sanitation District to pay for sewerage services provided by the District. Thus, said services are proposed to be financed in the new District by connection fees and annual user fees. 4 - - - - SCALE: l" = 3.5 MI. ~~~:~, •t . . . THOMAS BRO THE RS MAPS Source: T itl e: -5 " ....... ~! J I -<~-I -, -· . -0 1-1 l HINO I t:OrSO N A V 0 SILVER ADO CANYO N VIEJO REGIO NAL MAP (APPROXI MA TCLY) I 1 LA GL 1 - - - - - No Scale ~ Sourceo LAFCO 6 Ti t le : .... /· ; ,,----'"/ SPH ERES OF IN FLU ENCE ,. / / .. ···· .··· \ I 2 -.. 1.3 Project Characteristics County Sanitation Districts No's. 2 and 7 of Orange County have prepared this Environmental Impact Report to address measures relative to the proposed reorganization of certain territory into a new sanitation district to be known as District No. 13. The new District will include certain territory now within Districts No. 2 and No. 7 along with territory outside the boundaries but within the tributary area included in the District No. 2 and No. 7 Master Plan of Trunk Sewers. The proceedings for forming the new District will be. conducted pursuant to the District Reorganization Act (Government Code Section 56000 et. seq.}. The proposed reorganization has been assigned the title of Proposed Orange County District Reorganization No. 65. District No. 13 will include approximately 23,572 acres of largely undeveloped land. Of this total acreage, over 60 percent, or 14,300 acres, is designated as recreational and open space use. Approximately 2,177.74 acres of developed properties, or properties previously approved for deve 1 opment, wi 11 be removed from Districts Nos. 2 and 7 and transferred to the new District •. The proposed ultimate boundaries for the new District No. 13 are shown in Figure 3. The territories which will be detached from Districts No. t and No. 7 are listed in Table 1 and indicated in Figure 4. 7 - - - - Source: LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES 8 Title: BOUNDARY MAP OF PROPOSED SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 .I . ·-~ ""' . , ·<' --\ : \ 1 ... 3 I .. --, .. ·'"'• 'I ,_ .>t-;:. ~-~:/~>~. . -. . . ·:• -. :·:"' ~ :., ..... ~.~ .. · .. ~ ... -... · :: ~ -~ ~H ,..... :_ ;!: . .. ~ ...... '· . :•·. :" : .. • . . .'~~-· ~ ' ~--\"'· · "• ~ARY·0.,MITATION • ···~lj_ ,/ .,J;.~#14·-....... . ... '"' ~TIOtiltfO. 1 • ···:0 1 ,/•, i. :.o, · • "!: .. ' • • • • •, t• I !!ll!IA • ' ·:._; •, I ,• \· \ .; . \ .. ••• • L '' :\ I ·,I . "' . ' \ . ,,. . : .... c .. .... --·_.-~~~~<;:_ .. ~ .. : ............ r ·._ .... , ., ~ f A . •, \ .. ... . . . . . \ . .. f~ONNEC~ro~ FE;E;~ot!tz~ . SANIT A~l0,N DISTRICT NO. 713 -·-·· '"·· .... \ .. · ... ,, /_,-- i'---:~ .. ~t\.<, .. , .... I.-•••• • • .. . . l:i.;,, /-: . "1LJT:] -' 1r ,: · .... . \l -l .. '. ·· .. ~;. : . ~ 'JJ. I .J.·· .,_. c.•'' . ' . . ~ .. ' ~ r.:. .• !'. • Source: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 9 "'· .-.. ...·;. ,,. ... r, , ..... ,, 1: :. \ S: T I A .; 0 I. er~ I ::::JI I • O • IOOQ . 4000 . IOOO .. ....... _ ....... -..... ~ Title: DEVELOPMENTS TO BE DETACHED FROM DISTRICTS NO. 2 AND 7 AND OTHER APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS .. 'i>-······ ... 4 ... -' . TABLE 1 PROPERTIES TO BE DETACHED FROM DISTRICT NO. 2 AND NO. 7 Annexatfon No. Maximum Developable Acres Lots District No. 2 21 Upper K Ranch 24* Tract 9813 28R Anaheim Hills No. 7 35** Bryant Ranch 47 Community College Annexation 52*** Tract 10144 55**** Mark III Homes 138.75 175.42 169.28 1348.60 177.82 335.20 265. 249 559 4105 Community College 420 District No. 7 *· ** *** **** 109 Community College 30.0 Community College TOTAL 5598 2215.07 Excludes Tract No's. 9955-58, 10265-67 and 10592 that were part of original annexation proposal. These tracts will be in District No •. 2. Excludes Tract No. 10504 that was part of original annexation proposal. This tract will be in District No. 2. Excludes Tract No. 11174 that was part of original annexation proposal. This tract will be in Distri~t No. 2. Excludes Tract No. 9927, Tract No. 10130 and Tract No. 10470 which will be in District No. 2. These properties together with the unincorporated terri- tories will form District No. 13. The Master Plan of Sewers ultimately considered the ap- proved and planned land uses within District No. 13 (see Figure 4). Table 2 indicates the projected land use assumptions and average sewage fl ow. 10 - i - Land Use Residential ·Estate Density Low Density Medium Density High Density Commercial Recreational and O.S. Vacant (Fwy etc.) TOTAL TABLE 2 ULTIMATE LAND USE PLAN Acres 7,784 448 173 64 30 14,306 767 22,872 Sewage Flow Rate {gal/day/ac) 1,000 1,550 3,880 5,820 3,230 100 Projected Average Flow {MGD) 7.78 0.69 0.67 0.37 0.10 1.43 11.04 These projections represent approximately 25 ,273 dwelling units. and 326,700 square feet of commercial. use {see Figure 5). Sewage ·generated from these uses will be handled by facilities tri~utary to both Plant No. 1 and No. 2 (see Figure 6). The project does not involve the construction of new facilities. The properties within new District No. 13 will be served by acquisition of capacity in existing and future facilities of County Sanitation District trunk sewers 1, 2, 3, and 7, and jointly owned treatment plant facilities designed to serve the sewerage needs set forth in the approved General Plans of the tributary cities and the unincorporated territory of the County of Orange. All develop- ment within Sanitation District No. 13 has been or will be subject to specific environmental review and project construction approval by the County of Orange or the city in which it will occur. Figure 6 illustrates the sewer system requirements . for . ultimate development of District No. 13. District No. 13 will .·be required to buy a percentage of the system it ut i 1 i zes for sewage flow. The District's share of the costs for existing and new collec- tion facilities will be in_ proportion to the ratio of their ultimate 11 - I e flow projection over the design capacity of the facility. (see Appendix A}. In addition, District No. 13 will participate in existing, as well as future joint works projects. This ratio is based on a three-year average of flow and assessed valuation. The existing and projected capital costs will be funded through a financial program implemented within District No. 13. The proposed method inc 1 udes: 1} for new connect ions, co 11 ecti on of a one-time connection fee from each property owner on a per unit basis for res fdent i a 1 deve 1 opment and on a floor space basis for commer- cial/ i ndus trial development. The connection fees will be based upon the location of a particular development in relationship ·to. three zones, Zone A, B and C. The zones a re shown in Figure 4. The connection fee for development in Zone A is $220 per dwelling unit or $45 per 1,000 square feet for industrial/commercial use. In addi- tion, a fee is charged on a per acre basis based on the fee amount that was established at the time the annexation was requested. These fees range from $1,138/acre to $1,616/acre depending upon when annexation _procedures were initiated. The acreage fees are in addition to the per dwelling unit or per square feet fee. The fees for Zone a are $1,250 per dwelling unit or $250/1,000 square feet for industrial/commercial development. For Zone C the fees are ·$1,500/ dwelling unit or $300/1,000 square feet for industrial/commercial use; and 2} collection of a yearly service fee from each user which will also be determined by the Board. New and existing capacity in collection and treatment facilities that would serve the proposed District No. 13 are included in the Master Plan of Sewers and would be provided regardless _of the formation of a new di strict. If no new district were formed, an identical infrastructure would be provided by Districts No. 2 and No. 7, in accordance with the Master Plan of Sewers. 12 - -/. • Q LOS AHOELES COUNTY CE GE ND 1&00 "E40 UM f f~;.TT *IOU.T;AL. . , HI O~HSrTY AUIDl!!IT I~· -f .~' , CC!ll!"ERCllll 3810. 5 820 3230 ' • I ~ • llECAE:ATION I OPEN ~PACE 100 DRAINA GE BOUHO~Rlf.s' -.: ·, ---., ------.._ -. •. -.....,__ __ \ ~ '\ .. , Source: LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES I / l 3 ULTIMATE LAND USE PLAN SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 ORANGE COUNTY 2 0001 4000; 1000' Title : ULTIMATE LAND USE PLAN FOR PROPOSED DI STRIC T NO . 13 5 SANITATION - / .• ..J +' \. rt '. ', '\., \ LEGEND INTERCEPTOR ( WITH CONTRACT NO. I 8 AVERAGE UL TIMA_TE SEWAGI! 1.05 FLOWS (MOD) GENERATED BY DISTRICT NO. 13 / [---, · I DISTRICT NO. 13 __ ...J . Source: • ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 14 COLLECTION FACILITIES . UTILIZED BY DISTRICT NO. 13 ,.· '·· ~ ' . . . Title: MASTER PLAN COLLECTION AND TREATMENT FACILITIES TO BE USED BY PROPOSED DISTRICT NO. 13 ·. -.... No Sceie 6 ~ i15i i.ll~S, .... ·'-·~-'·=r I .... I l!!!f 2.0 OVERVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ·2.1 Existing Conditions The proposed District No. 13 is a 23,572 acre area in northeast Orange County which is adjacent to the b·oundaries of Los Angeles, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. For the most part it includes undeveloped foothill areas of the Chino Hills and the Santa Ana Mountains. District No. 13 contains areas within the juris- dictions of the Cities of Yorba Linda, Anaheim, Brea, Orange, and the County of Orange. At present, there are eight developments amounting to +2178 acres that are either annexed to Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 and District No. 7 or are proposed for annexation for which service is being provided without ad valorem property tax revenue to the Sanitation Districts. The remainder of the project area, 21,394 acres is not annexed· to any District, and at present, is ·not developed and no sewer service is being provided. The estimated total build-out (includes the already developed portions) of the entire area, which falls within the Master Plan of Sewers, is 25;273 residential units and 30 commercial ·acres. The existing and proposed sewage facilities included in the Master Pl ans are adequate to serve the area to be included in District No. 13. 2.2 Related Projects No projects have been identified which are related to the proposed project or which could result in a cumulative effect when combined with the proposed project. 15 : ~ 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ) .. 3.1 Land Use 3.1.1 Inducement of Urban Growth Environmental Setting The 23,572 acre area is currently 91.8 percent undeveloped. New development will occur in this area regardless of formation of the new district. If District 13 is not approved, the sanitation needs of the area will be provided by Districts No. 2 and No. 7, through annex- ation·. Annexation to Districts No. 2 and No. · 7 would require that special service agreements be signed or fee zon~s be formed to insure that the areas not providing property tax revenue wil 1 pay their fair share of collection and treatment costs. Project Impact Approval of the project, which includes the formation of District No. 13 and funding of the buy-in of existing and proposed facilities, .will facilitate the recovery of collection and treatment costs. The Orange County Sanitation Districts No. 2 and No. 7 will provide service to approved developments within the proposed District No. 13 area up to and including the development intensity as defined by the ultimate la_nd use plan which includes 25,273 .dwelling units and. 326,700 square feet of commercial use if no new district is· formed. Approval of the project will provide a convenient and efficient method of providing the Districts a means to recover collection and treatment costs. Environmental impacts associated with development of the ultimate land use plans for the area would occur regardless of the action taken on formation of the new district. Based on previous envi ronmenta 1 documentation that ·has been prepared on proposed development projects within the area of the proposed District No. 13, the fo 11 owing en vi ronmenta 1 impacts might 16 w. occur from those· proposed developments in the ultimate land us~ plans approved by the cities and the County. The following environmental impacts are not associated with the ·proposed formation of District No. 13, but are potential environmental impacts associated with projects proposed for the area within the boundary of District No. 13. Air Quality Geology Paleontology Archaeological Historical increased emissions would be generated from vehicle traffic in an area where no emissions are currently produced. Development in an area where faults (the Whittier Fault transects a large portion of the area), landslides, slope instability and liquefaction potential exists. -Even though signific~nt paleontologic re- sources have not been found, some resources do exist within the area of proposed District No. 13. Grading could .damage any resources, or if managed correctly, could recover important resources. -Archaeological resources are known to exi~t within the area of proposed District No. 13, and could be damaged during grading operations that would occur after approval of tract development. -Historic and cultural resources are known to exist within the area of proposed District No. 13 and could be disturbed during preparation of approved development sites. 17 .... Biol ogi ca 1 Hydrology/ Drainage and Flooding Ci rcul at ion Noise -Development of previously undisturbed lands results in impacts to biological resources which are irreversible and permanent. The degree of significance is based on whether the biological resources include "endangered species." There are no known endangered species within the area to be included in Proposed District No. 13. -Surface drainage of developed property gener- ally increases by slightly less than double over undeveloped properties. Natural drainage courses exist throughout the proposed Dis- trict. Development in this area could impact these drainage courses. There are areas within the proposed District No. 13 which could be subject to severe flooding. -Development of. the Ultimate Land Use. Plan would result in 25 ,27·3 dwelling unit~ ~nd 326,700 square feet of commercial use or approximately 279,519 vehicle trips* dis- tributed throughout the area. The only known existing major noise source within the Proposed District No. 13 is that produced by the railroad through Santa Ana Canyon. Development of the Ultimate Land * Includes existing development identified in Table 1. Total vehicle trips are based on 10 trips/day/dwelling unit and 82· trips/day/1000 square feet of commercial use. · 18 ... . Energy Public Utilities Water Supply Use Plan would result in the generation of additional vehicle trips which would increase noise levels in the area of proposed District No. 13 • -Development of the Ultimate Land Use Plan would result in. the use of .non-renewable energy resources in the form of natural gas and oil for electricity, etc. The develop- ments will have to conform to regulations establishing energy conservation standards for new residential and non-residential buildings, effective July 13, 1982. An estimated con- sumption of .42 million KWH daily and 7.9 million cubic feet of natural gas daily is projected for ultimate development of the Land Use Master Plans.* ... Water is a natural resource which, for the most part, has to be purchased in Southern California. Development of the Ultimate Land Use Plan may impact water availability. An estimated consumption of approximately 6.35 million gallons of water per day is projected at full development. Sewage Disposal -The Orange County Sanitation Districts Master Plan of Sewers is designed to accommodate deve 1 opment up to that proposed in the Ult i - mate Land Use Plans of the various responsible agencies in the area. The planned development * Includes existing developments identified in Table 1. 19 - Telephone Electrical Gas of 25,273 dwelling units and 326,700 square feet of commercial use will not adversely impact the system. An estimated flow of 6.14 MGD is projected at full development. The Pacific Te 1 ephone and Te 1 egraph, in accordance with the requirements of California Public Utilities Commission, will provide service to development within the proposed District No. 13. Impacts associated with the construction of utility lines may ·occur. The Southern California Edison Company, in accordance with the requirements of the Public Utilities Commission, will provi~e service to development within the proposed District No. 13 which will result in the irretrievable commitment of non-renewab 1 e energy resource. An estimated consumption of .428 mi 11 ion KWH daily is projected for development of the Ultimate Land Use Plans.* The Southern Ca 1 i forni a Gas Company, in accordance with the requirem~nts of the Public Utilities Commission, will provide servke to development within the pr~posed District No. 13 which will result in the irretrievable commitment of non-renewab 1 e energy resources. An estimated consumption of 7.9 million cubic feet of natural gas daily is projected for development of the Ultimate Land Use Plans.* * Includes existing developments identified in Table 1. 20 ~ a~·'S.~~ •f-. • -\... . I . Community Services Solid Waste -Development of the Ultimate Land Use Plan will Fire · Protection Police .Protection Schools reduce the available capacity of the existing landfills, may necessitate creation of new landfills or alternate methods of county disposal facilities. An estimated generation of 203,663 pounds of solid waste is projected for development of the Ultimate Land Use Plans.* Much of the land area within the p~oposed District No. 13 is considered an "Extreme Fire Hazard Area." Development of the area will have an impact on the fire protection facili~ ties in the servicing conununities. -Development of the Ultimate Land Use Plans will increase the demand on existing police fac i 1 iti es in the servicing communities and may necessitate new facilities. Full development may exceed the capacity of the existing servicing school districts and additional classrooms or new facilities m.ay be required. However, it should be noted that in many districts in the area of proposed Dis- trict No. 13, enrollment is declining. * Includes existing developments identified in Table 1. 21 .... ... .... Recreation -Development of the Uitimate Land Use Pl ans will increase the demand on existing park and recreational facilities in the servicing communities and may necessitate the creation of new facilities. Reorganization of Districts No. 2 and No. 7, and the for- mation of District 13, will not affect the magnitude of the impacts described. Planned growth in the area is controlled by the responsible agencies (city and county governments) who have jurisdiction ·over specific portions of the area proposed for inclusion in the new dis- trict. Identical sewage facilities with sufficient capacity to accom~ -modate planned development would be provided with, or without, reorgan- ization and formation of the new district. Formation of the new district wi 11 cause no phys i ca 1 changes in the kind or amount of treatment and collection facilities constructed in the area. The p~oposed action will not impact the quality or quantity of sewage generated in the area, or delivered to the District's treatment facil- ities. The reorganization and new district formation will only ·have administrative and organizational effects. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are necessary since the proposed action will not create or change land use impacts in the a~fected area, or other areas • 22 llll[IJ. ."!!'! .· Population Environmental Setting At present, the area which would form proposed District No. 13 is largely undeveloped. The exceptions to this are the existing developments identified in Table 1. Together, these developments, and planned development represent 25,273 dwelling units and a population of 76,189. Project Impact .Approval of the project, which includes the formation .of Di stri cf No. 13 and funding of the buy-in of existing and proposed facilities, will not affect growth. The Orange· County Sanitation o·istricts. will provide service to approved developments within the proposed District No. 13 area up to and including the development intensity as defined by the ultimate land use plans which includes 25,273 dwelling units. Service will be provided whether or not the proposed reorganization and new district formation is approved.· The estimated population which could ultimately be generated by total buildout· would be 76,189 persons.* An increase in the growth rate from zero .Percent ·to an average of 5.6 percent per year over a 20-y.ear period i"s antidpated. The SCAG population forecasted growth for this 20-year period is 93,000 persons; therefore, buildout of the ultimate land use plans is-within the projected growth of the area.** ·Mitigation Measures Reorganization of Districts No. 2 and No. 7, and formation of District 13, will have no impact on growth in the affected area. No mitigation measures are required. * Includes existing development identified in Table 1. ** Southern California. Association of Governments -82 Population Forecast, RSA 41, adopted September 2, 1982. 23 . ., 4.0 .. LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT 4.1 The Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of Man's Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity The action is designed to provide a means by which the Orange County Sanitation District can finance service to existing and proposed development occurring subsequent to the tax initiativ·e approved June 7, 1978. The. action has no short or long-ter~ effect on man's environment as it is an action relating only to the creation of jurisdict1onal boundaries. The action o·nly affects the administration of wastewater management, and not the quantity and qual1ty of wastewater generated or collection and treatment facilities required • 24 4.2 Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would Be Involved in the Proposed Project if it is Implemented Approval and implementation of the formation of Sanitation Dis~rict No. 13 would not result in any irreversible environmental changes. Planned development will be acconunodated with or without the prepared reorganization and new district formation. Discretionary actions relating to planned development are made under the authority of City and County agencies, and impacts resulting from these acti ans. wi 11 be reviewed in environmental documentation prepared by those agencies. 25 ·- ' - 4.3 . The Growth-Inducing Impact of the Proposed Action The proposed project wi 11 have no growth inducing impacts. The reorganization of Districts No. 2 and No. 7 and formation of District 13, wi 11 neither facilitate nor .impede development in the affected area. The formation of District No. 13 area will acconnnodate development of approximately 25 ,273 dwe 11 i ng uni ts* and 326, 700 square feet of commercial use fo accord with the Ultimate Land Use Plans. The potential employment growth resulting from this development wou.ld. be approximately 10,800. jobs. Projected population growth from these develop~ents would be.approximately 76,189 pe~sons.* Proposed District No. 13 is in Regional Statistical Area 41, Santa Ana Canyon. The housing growth forecast is estimated at 40,000 dwelling units between 1980 and 2000. Development consistent with the Ultimate Land Use ·Plans would represent approximately 63 percent of this projected growth.* The employment growth forecast is estimated at 29 ,000 jobs .between 1980 and 2000. Development consistent with the Ultimate Land Use Plans would represent approximately 37 percent of the projected growth.* The population growth forecast is estimated at 93,000 persons between 1980 and 2000. Development consistent with the Ultimate Land Use Plans would represent approximately 82 percent of this projected growth.* * Includes existing development identified in Table 1. 26 -&w,.~.i~ l-... _/ ... . ,•· _,. 5.0 IMPACTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT Certain environmental impacts were not determined significant enough for analysis in this EIR. This determination was made in the Initial Study, which is included in Section 2.0. Those impacts not designated for discussion are determined insignificant because of the nature of the project. 27 I w ' i d .1 i .w ! : ! L.J I i \-1 I I l-1 w I I I .; u I i i.J ' I 6.d. I ~ 6.0 CUMULATIVE: IMPACTS Approv~l ~nd implementation of the proposed District No. 13 would not result in any cumulative impact. 28 .... -- 7.0 SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES No mitigation measures are required for the project and no environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of approval of the project. However, significant environmental impacts could occur as a result of the development which is planned for the area. These poten- tial impacts will be the result of discretionary action by other agen- cies, and will not occur because of project approval •. Cumulative impacts will also occur from development of the Ultimate Land Use Plans. Individual development impacts and cumulative impacts will be identified and their mitigation measures discussed on a case-by-case basis in environmental documentation prepared by the lead agencies responsible for individual project approval • 29 .. - .... - 8.0 UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS CEQA and its associated guidelines [California Administrative Code Section 15143 (b)] states that an EIR must describe any signifi- cant impacts which cannot be avoided or totally eliminated if the project is implemented. There are no unavoidable adverse impacts resulting from the proposed action. The proposed action will only impact the adminis- tration of sewage treatment and collection in the area • 30 ·- - ... I ... - .. 9.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION 9.1 No Project or Postponement In consideration of possible alternatives to any given action, one course which is both logical and mandated by applicab"le guidelines is the "no project or postponement alternative. · This alternative would prevent the formation of a new Sanitation District. The developments identified in Table 1 would remain annexed to Sanita- tion Districts No. 2 and No. 7. The approved developments identified in Table 2 would annex to Districts No. 2 or No. 7 to obtain sewer· service and would pay connection fees and service fees to those districts. New development applications· in the area of proposed District No. 13 would be annexed to Districts No. 2 or No. 7 and service would be provided. Sanitation District No. 2 and No. 7 would establish fee zones to provide revenue in lieu of ad valorem property taxes • 9.2. Alternative to form a Sanitation District Independent of the Orange County Sanitation District's Facilities A new and separate Sanitation District could be formed by new developments requiring sewer service. However, trunk sewer lines would have to be installed and treatment facilities would have to be built. Treatment facilities can be built to handle as few as 300 homes. Formation of the new district would require approval from · Loca·l Agency Formation Cammi ss ion and the Orange County Boa rd of Supervisors. This alternative would result in an independent sani- tation. district that would not be a part of the Orange County Sani- tation Districts, and would be unable to share in the Districts' collection and treatment facilities. 31 .• .... ..... - Impacts resulting from construction of trunk lines, treatment facilities, and effluent disposal cannot be quantified without devel- . oping site specific details. Generally, the impacts resulting from this alternative would be of greater magnitude and.severity· than those associated with the proposed action. While the project, as defined, is without significant adverse impacts, this alternative would result in additional construction of facilities, probable changes in effluent· quality,. changes in effluent disposal requirements, and secondary impacts such as traffic and circulation disruption during construction, and air quality impacts. 9.3 Alternative Treatment of Sewage Development. of the area could continue by utilization of septic tan~ systems. However, soil testing for percolation capabili- ties would be required prior to developmental approval _to assess feasibility ·of such systems. Geological conditions can vary such that the feasibility of septic tanks can be questionable for development within 1000 feet of each other. Large scale use of septic tanks can have detrimental effects on public health and on ground water quality. 9.4 Annex Entire Unannexed Area to District No.7 or District No. 2 The entire unannexed areas which are proposed for inclusion in District 13 could be annexed to a contiguous District. Areas presently within Districts No. 2 and No. 7 that are proposed for detachment and inclusion in District No. 13 would remain in their present District. This alternative would require that Districts ~o.· 2 and.No. 7 es~ablish fee zones or service agreements for the newly annexed areas, and the areas proposed for detachment, to recover capital and operating costs. Physical impacts resulting from this alternative would be no different than the proposed project. 32 10.0 .-.j . ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED LAFCO Ultrasystems ·Lowry and Associates Orange County Environmental Health .33 Kenneth W. Scattergood, Administrative Assistant Phil Martin Senior Project.Manager Michae 1 Swan . John Byers 11.0 ·- ·- .... REFERENCES Environmental Documentation Travis Ranch Draft EIR Tentative Tracts 10,000 and 10,002 Shorb Rivas Draft EIR Tentative Tract 10144 Domingas Ranch Draft EIR Tentative Tract 9813 Bryant Ranch Draft EIR Upper K Ranch Draft EIR Santa Ana River Intercepter Katella Avenue to La Palma Avenue Environmental Assessment Santa Ana River Interceptor of County Sanitation District No. 2 · Environmental Assessment Public Documents Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Southern California Association of Governments Growth Forecast Policy, adopted September 2, 1982. 34 Ll r--M ·1 .-~~~i~ \I (-·. . I j • ,.! • / ~J. J. ' .. JJ. I 1. i.- I ! i I.I· u . . ! I . ~- I ·. , I w . I \.J i I w APPENDICES . i f· . ·W U· . i I ·~ i ! I - I : i ~ . ! ·w ; I ~ ! . '.J I '-' APPENDIX A INITIAL STUDY T ..... ... INITIAL STUDY (To Be Completed by Lead Agency) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNiA P. 0. SOX al27 1084'4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (7U) 540-2910 (714) 962-24 l I Background A. Name of Proponent County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 8. Address and Phone Number of Proponent ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 C. Contact Person Hilary-J. Baker, Senior Engineering Aide D . Title and Location of Project Formation of Sanitation District No. 13; Northeastern Orange County, bordered on the north bi Los Angeles County line, on the east by San Bernardino and Riverside County lines, on the south by the Orange County portion of the Santa Ana Mountains and on the west by the communities of Brea, Yorba Linda, Anaheim and Orange. E. Description of Project Formation of a new Sanitation District to provide fin,ncial framework to pay the cosi of providina sewage service to properties within the area. Does not involve construction .of new facilities, only the acquisition of capacity in existing and future facilities. - I I . Gui de l i nes A. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project !S defined in Section 28. Yes x No ----- (If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form. ) . B. · Does the project qualify as: , Ministerial (Section 6) Yes . No ·X ~. 2. Emergency (Section 13) Yes No x 3. A _feasibility or planning study (Section 33) Yes No X d. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article a of the State Guidelines (Section 40) Yes No x 5. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 36) Yes No X If yes, identify lead agency: (!f yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report .or Negative Declaration need not be prepared.) · III. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of ail "yes" and "maybe" ans·11ers are required ·an attached sheets.) A. Earth. ~ill the proposal result in: 1. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? 2. Disruptions, displacements, comoaction or overcovering of the soil? 3. .Change in ·topography or ground surf ace rilief features? 4. The destruction, covering or modification Yes of any unique geologic or physical features? __ 5. Any increase in wind or water erosion· of soils, either on or off the site? -2- ~aybe No x x x x x 8. - --.. c. ·• 6. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands or changes in silation, aeposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or st~eam or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet er lake? i. ~xposure o~ people or property to geological hazards such as earthquakes, landslides; mudslides, ground failure or similar hazard? Air ... '~i 11 the proposal result in: '1. Substantial air emissions or deteriora- ti on of ambient air quality? 2. The creation of objectionable odors? 3. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature or any change in climate, either locally or reg i ona 11 y? 1.-iater. '" i 11 the proposal result in: 1. Changes in currents or the course of direction of water movements in either marine or fresh water? 2. 3. 4. 5. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surf ace runoff? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surf ace water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding, but not limited to, temperature, disso1Ved oxygen or turbidity? 6. Alteration of the direction or rate .of flow of ground waters? 7. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- Yes Maybe No x x x x x x x x x x x x ... .. .. .,,,; ""' ~ 8. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise avaiiable for pubiic ·water supplies? 9. Exposure of people or property to re1atad hazards such as flooding or tidal wave~?· 0. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: c: I.. • c I • G. 1. 2. 3 •. 4. Change in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aauatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare o~ endanger~d species of plants? Introduction of new species of plants into an area or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? R~duction in acreage of any agriculture crop? An ima 1 Life. '" i 11 the pr'.Jposa1 result ; n: 1. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects? 2. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? 3. Introduction of new species of an i ma 1 s into .an area or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? 4. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Noise. Wi 11 the proposal result in: l. increase in existing noise l e·1e 1 s? 2. Exposure of people to se,1ere noi5e levels? Light and G 1 are. '"'; 11 the prcposai produce ne'"' 1 i ght or glare? -4- Yes Maybe x x x x x x x x x x x x .X - - 'mi. ... H. L~nd Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteraticn 0f the present or planned land use of an area? I. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: , u. K. L. 1. Increase in the rate of use of any naturil resources? 2. Substantiai depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? Risk of Upset. 'tli11 the proposal involve: 1. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 2. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation p 1 an.? Population. · Wi 11 the proposa 1 a 1 ter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of .the human population of an .area? Hc~sing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additicnal housing? M. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: l. 2. 3. 4. ,. !j • Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation rir movement of people and/or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? -5- Yes Maybe . No x x x x x x x x x x x . x ·-' . .i - 6. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? N. ·Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Fire protection? Police protection1 Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities,· in- cluding roads? Other governmental services? O. Energy. Will the proposal result in: p' l. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? 2: Sub st anti a 1 increase in demand upon eiisting sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utiliiies? l. 2. 3. 4. Power or natural gas? Communications systems? 1Aater? Sewer or septic tanks? 5. Storm water drainage? ~. ·solids ~aste and disposal? Q. Human Health. ~ill the proposal result in: 1. Creation of any health haz?rd or potent~al health hazard (excluding mental health)? -6- Yes x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x R. 2. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstrtiction cf any scenic vista or view open to the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? S. Recreation. ~ill the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of ·existing recreational opportunities? · T. Cultural Resources. 1. -Will the proposal result ·;n the alteration of o~ the destruction of a prehistoric or historic·archaeological site? 2. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? 3. Does the proposal have the potential to ca~se a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ~ill the· proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potent i a 1 imp act area? U. ~~ndatory Findi~gs of Significance. 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a · fish or wildlife species, cause a fish o~ wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare·or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major pe~iods of California history or prehistory? -i- Yes Maybe No x x x x x. x x x ........ ...J' 2. Ooe·s the project have the potent i a 1 to achieve shoit-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, de- finitive period of time, while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulative con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact. on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is s .i g n i fi cant . ) 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects 9n human beings, eithe~ directly or indirectly? IV. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation See attached sheet . Yes ._ v. Discussion of Zoning Compatibility See attached sheet. VI. ·Determination 1119 (To be completed by Lead Agency.) .. I •• On the basis of this initfal evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION wi·ll be prepared . I.find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not·be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Maybe No x x x D D Date: August 18, 1983 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ATTACHMENT ___ 11 I. . ___ ·_Environm~rita 1 Impacts --- Item K. The proposal may alter the distribution of humah population within the area, hciwever, it is unlikely. The Sanitation Districts are a single- s~r~ice ·agency and ·only provide sewer service to accommodate growth outlined in the City and County General Plans. All existing or pro- posed projects in the area have been or will be required to provide adequate environmental documentation on an individual project basis. Item L. The proposal will allow properties to connect to a sewerage facility. It should be noted that all developments connect to the local sewering agency facilities, which, in turn, connect to the Districts' trunk sewer facilities. The proje~t does not involve the construction of new faci- 1 ities, only the acquisition of capacity in existing and future facilities. r tern u .. 4 .. Indirectly, the proJect wil 1 accommodate growth al lowed by the Cities and County within the District boundaries. All impacts for individual projects will be addressed in specific project EIR's. ) ~ I 'wJ : I ~ J I ... ; I I r.i I . I ~ I I ··W I l. ~ APPENDIX B FORMATION COST ANALYSIS ~ i '-' I .J ~ .1 ~ I : I ;_,J \.) j i ·'8.J l ~ J j I ....; i i ~- ~ ' ~ ~ ( i.J ~ \ ~ i t.,j I ~ .. FORMATION COST ANALYSIS FOR SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 . ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA JUNE 1984 PREPARED FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PREPARED BY LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES ~-. .... DISTRICT NO. 13 FORMATION SUMMARY The study area to be included was determined by defining all undeveloped land between the existing boundaries of Districts No. 2 & 7 and the boundary of the County of Orange. Also included were certain ar~as in various stages of development that were in the process of annexing to either District No. 2 or No. 7. Some of these parcels are· being included in the new District and will be discussed in a subsequent -~ection of this report. In order to determine the eastern bou~dary, the District's prev·ious master planning· was analy- . . _zed closely and a logical tributary drainage area was developed. A detailed legal description and map developed ·for this boundary (Reorganization No. 65) has been submitted·to LAFCO for their approv- al pending completion of the EIR. Land use plans for ultimate build-out of the study area were gathered from the appropriate juri sdi ctiona 1 agencies and a composite land use plan. for the proposed District No. 13. The proposed District No. 13 will include over 24,000 total acres of which over 60 percent, or 14,500 acres, is d~signated as recreational a~d -0pen space uses. The new District is projected to generate an average flow of 11.61 million gallons per day (mgd} based on the ultimate land use as shown. in Table .1. As can be seen, District No. 13 drains to many different basins which will require the utilization of capacity in existing and proposed collection facilities of other Districts in addition to joint works facilities for treatment and disposal. Flows from the new District will be tributary to the existing and projected wastewater collection facilities. Based on projected District 13 flows and the Consolidated Master Plans,· proportionate capacity requirements were developed for· the new ·District in each of these existing collection facilities as well as TABLE 1 PROJECTED ULTMATE LAND USE AND SEWAGE FLOW FOR DISTRICT NO. 13 SEWAGE FLOW PROJECTED LAND USE ~ COEFFICIENT AVERAGE FLOW ~ (AC) (GAL/DAY/AC) (MGD) -Residential Estate Density 7,784 1000 7.78 L.ow Density 448 1550 0.69 Medium Density 173 3880 0.67 •• High Density 64 5820 0.37 Conunercial 30 3230 0.10 · Recreatiqnal and o.s. 14,306 100 1.43 _. vacant (Frwy, Etc.) 767 ~ TOTALS 23,572 11.04 ... .... . te t!!!!i . - new collection facilities which are anticipated to be needed in the future. The Consolidation Master Plans and also past planning assumed that the study area would eventually be annexed to either District No. 2 or District No. 7 and capacity exchanges in the Consolidated Master Plans were developed based on that assumption. After the capacity exchanges recommended in the Master Pl ans a~e accomplished, the new District can then purchase the collection facility capacity.from either District No.·2 or No. 7 as appropriate. The current value of the existing collection facilities was determined by using the District's standard policy of escalating the project cost at the time of construction; the ratio c:>f the ·current ENR over the ENR for the time of construction. District No. 13's proportionate share of the cost of proposed future collection facili- ties is determined from today's cost of constructing these proposed facilities times the ratio of the new District's flow requirements to the total projected flow requirements. The detailed development of . these facilities and their costs is summarized in Table 2. These costs were originally developed at August, 1982 dollars when the 20 Cities average ENR was 3,870. Therefore, they are escalated to July, 1984 dollars by the ratio of 4,200 (estimated 20 Cities ENR) over 3,870. . District No. 13 will also be required· to purchase its proport~onate share i~ existing _joint works facilities such as treatment plant capacity, administrative facilities, outfall capa- city, etc. The proportionate capacity of District No 13 is based on District No. 13's projected flow requirements of 11.04 mgd over the rated capacity of these existing facilities, 208 mgd. District No. 13 will also be responsible for their share of future joint works facilities. The District No. 13 share of these join works facilities is summarized in Table 3. It is recommended that District No 13· consist of three separate zohes for collection of fees. TABLE 2 EXISTING COLLECTION FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13 SHARE FACILITY Carbon Canyon Interceptor Richfield and Kellogg Sub Trunks South Santa Ana River Interceptor Santa Ana River Interceptor Tustin-Orange Interceptor * Orangethorpe Trunk and Relief Knott Interceptor. FACILITY TOTAL @ ENR20 = 3870 TOTAL @ ENR'ZD = 4200 NEW COLLECTION FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13 SHARE Carbon Canyon Interceptor (Tunnel Alt.) Imperial Highway Relief Taft Branch Parallel and Relief South Santa Ana River Int. Parallel Chapman Extension Handy Creek Parallel Fullerton-Brea Parallel Orangethorpe Parallel TOTAL @ ENR-zo = 3870 TOTAL @ ENRio = 4200 ~ $ 798,803 34,220 278,057 3,270,656 1,837,976 59,580 473,898 $6,753,190 $7,329,043 COST $2,309,960 26,400 190,497 280,000 178,000 308,133 542,287 534,·905 $4,370,182 $4,742,833 * Tustin-Orange Interceptor includes Handy Creek, Santiago Canyon Road Trunk, the Red Hill Interceptor and Relief Trunk and the sunflower Interceptor. Costs have been escalated based on ratio of 20 Cities Average ENR to anticipated July, 1984 ENR of 4200. ... ... - - TABLE 3 JOINT WORKS FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13 SHARE Existing Joint Works Facilities (Book Value) Land Cost (Book Value) Total Existing Joint Works Existing Joint Works Capacity = 208 mgd Projected District No. 13 Flow = 11.04 mgd $ 241, 639, 245 1,969,000 $243,608,245 District No. 13 Share = $243,608,245 x 11 •04 -$ 12,929,976 208 - Future Joint Works Facilities (Estimate). $86,000,000 District No. 13 Share = $86,000,000 x 11 •04 = . $ 4,564,615 208 Total District No. 13 Share $ 17,494,591 -· 1. 2. .. Zone A -Includes parcels for which negotiations have already started for annexation to either District No. 2 or 7 or parcels which have completed annexation to either District but will be deannexed and incorporated into District 13. Table 4 shows these parcels includ- ing the annexation fees in effect when the annexation was requested, fees paid to date and the number of acres and 1 ots in each annexation proposa 1 • Si nee monies have already been deposited with the Districts, connection fees should be based on the fees establish- ed at the time annexation was requested. These fees range from $1,138/acre to $1,616/acre depending on when annexation procedures were initiated. Addition- ally, connection fees of $220 per dwelling unit or $45 per 1,000 square feet for industrial/commercial. should be collected based on the level of development antici- pated when annexation was requested. Development greater than the acreages or lots shown in Table 4 should be charged at the current Zone B rate. Zone B -This zone incorporates areas included within the Districts' ultimate Master Plan where no annexa- tion procedures have been initiated. Based on the cost analyses of existing and proposed collection facilities and joint works facilities, the Zone B area should be assessed connection fees of $1,250/dwelling unit for residential or $250/1,000 square feet for industrial/commercial development. 3. Zone C -Zone C includes the regional tributary to the Carbon Canyon Pump Station. The connection fee for this area is higher because the cost of providing service must include either a pump station/force main system or a gravity tunnel system. The connection fee for Zone C is recommended to be $1,500/dwelling unit or $300/1,000 square feet for industrial/commercial. - ~ ~ ml - TABLE 4 SUMMARY June 1, 1984 ZONE A ACREAGE ACREAGE MAXIMUM DEVELOPABLE ANNEXATION NO. FEE RATE FEES PAID ACRES LOTS ($/ACRE) ($) DISTRICT NO. 2 211) 1,138 157,897 138.75 265 24 1,438 90,860 175.42 249 28R 1,496 253,250 169.28 559 35 2 ) 1,496 2 ,017 ,506 1,348.60 4,105 47 0 177.82 COMM. 52 3 ) COLLEGE 1,616 0 335.20 420 55 4 ) DISTRICT NO. 7 109 0 30.0 COMM. COLLEGE TOTAL ACREAGE FEE PAID $2,519,513 (Existing Revenue) TOTAL LOTS 5,598 PROJECTED AC. FEE 723,030 CONNECTION FEES ALREADY PAID 257,023 PROJECTED CONN. FEES 1,231,560 (5598 x $220/du) TOTAL.PROJECTED REVENUE $4,731,126 l) · Excludes Tract No's. 9955-58, 10265-67 and 10592 that were part of original annexation proposal. These tracts will be in District No. 2. 2) 3) 4) Excludes. Tract No. 10504 that was part of original annexation proposal. This tract will be in District No. 2. · Excludes Tract No. 11174 that was part of original annexation proposal. This tract will be in District No. 2. Tract 10899 Paid Zone B Connection Fees and will not pay any annexation fees excludes Tract No.'s 9927, 10130 and 10470 which will be in District No. 2. .... . - ..... ~- As can be seen from Table 4, to date, _$2.43 million has already been collected from the Zone A area of District No. 13. this money, along .with· a projected $1.23 mill ion in additional connection. fees and $0.72 million in additional acreage fees, can be applied to purchase necessary capacity in the joint works and collection facili- ties. The proposed District No. 13 share of all the costs in- volved in determining fees are summarized in Table 5 along with unit costs per mill ion gallon. Based upon these costs and the total projected revenue (acreage and connection fees of about $4.38 mi 1- 1 ion), District No. 13 could purchase about 1.63 mill ion gallons a day of collection, treatment and disposal capacity (its proportionate ·.share of all necessary facilities). Based on revenues already collected ·to dat~ ( $2. 43 mi 11 ion) , the new District could purchase approximately 1.32 ~illion gallons a day of existing collection and joint works. facilities. Howev~r, it is recommended that the new District purchase 0.9 million gallons a day of capacity in existing facilities with its existing revenues. T~e remaining necessary capacity .will not be required for so~e ·time and can be purchased in the future when development levels exceed 3,000 dwelling units. Future connection and acreage fee revenues should be used to fund District No. 13's share of additional capacity in existing .and proposed future collection and joint works facilities. This first phase District No. 13 capacity of 0.9 mill ion gallons a day will serve approximately 3,000 equivalent dwelling uni ts which should provide adequate capacity for the proposed new district for many years. In the future, an additional 0.73 mgd should.be purchased in existing facilities plus the total 1.63. mgd in future facilities, giving the new District a total of 1.63 mgd of capacity in exfsting and proposed future collection and joint works facilities. This 1.63 mgd will serve approximately 5,500 equivalent dwelling uni ts • TABLE 5 TOTAL DISTRICT NO. 13 FACILITIES COST SHARE .... TOTAL DISTRICT 13 UNIT COST Existing Collection Facilities $ 7,329,043 .... Existing Joint Works Facilities 12,929,976 Formation Expenses . 100,000 ~ Subtotal Existing $20,359,019 $1,844,114/mgd Future Collection Facilities $ 4,742,833 ... Future Joint Works Facilities 4,564,615 Subtotal Future $ 9,307,448 $ 843,066/mgd Grand Total $29,666,467 $2,687,180/mgd ~ Existing Zone A Revenues $2,428,653 1.32 mgd = $1,844,114 -. Existing Facilities Unit Cost Total Zone A Revenues = $4,375,464 = 1.63 mgd Total Facilities Unit Cost $2,687,180 ! .. . f Reconunended Initial Buy-in of 0.9 mgd = $1,844,114/mgd x 0.9 mgd = $1,659,703 -· ·~ I I l..l I . . I i..J J , r I . .i,.j .· r. ~ ·. J. j \.J . I i ~ . . '-' I ... ' J .. w I I I Ii.I. : I ~ APPENDIX C ·RESPONSES TO THE NOTICE OF PREPARATION ..... .... CHAIRMAN ,RRIETT M. WIEDER ~ PERVISOR · !ftl!coND DISTRICT VICE-CHAIRMAN )NALO J. SALTARELLI >UNCILMAN 't!!lffY OF. TUSTIN ROGER R. STANTON '1PE.RVISOR RST DISTRICT ~· . ROBERT E. DWYER RF.PRESENTATIVE OF · :NERAL PUBLIC "'MES T. JARRELL COUNCILMA.N f"•TY OF BUENA PARK .TE RNATE 'i'MILLIP R. SCHWARTZE COUNCILMAN f"ITv OF SAN Jt.JAN CAPISTR~NO .TERNATE ~AN K. RIDDLE RE.J•RESENTATIVE.OF f:~l\IE RAL PUBLIC • TERNATE ~UC.E NESTANDE · SUPERVISOR Tl-flRD DISTRICT CHARO T. TURNER ~ECUTIVE OFFICER ... OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION · September 12, 1983 Hilary J. Baker, Senior Engineering Aide Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Hilary Baker: RE Draft Environmental Impact Report OP.ANGE COUNTY HALL OF 40'.W-llSTRATION BUILDING 10 CIVIC C:lNTF P PIJ~7A, k(101\1' 458 SANTA /~NA, CAL.If uRNIA 9~701 TELEPHONE: (714) 834·2239 County Sanitation District No. 13 Formation The project as identified in the notice of preparation. for the subject environmental impact report (EIR) is the formatiori of County Sanitation District No. 13 and the transfer of territory from County Sanitation District Nos. 2 and 7 to County Sanitation District No. 13 (OCSD-13) as illustrated on the sketch accompa- nying the notice of preparation~ The project will first require the approval of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). Since the project involves reorganizing certain boundaries within OCSD-2 and OCSD-7 as well as the formation of OCSD-13, the project is considered a "reorganization" as defined by the District Reor- ganization Act (CA Govt. Code Section 56000 et seq.). All. pro- ceedings will be conducted under the procedure outlined in the· District Reorganization Act. The proposed reorganization has been assigned a reorganization title "Proposed Orange County District Reorganization No. 65 11 and a 11 future correspondence and documents should reference this title. The project area is located within the spheres of influence deve- loped by LAFCO for the cities of Anaheim, Brea, Orange, Yorba Linda and within the sphere of influence of the Irvine Ranch Water District .which presumed eventually ·these areas.would be within the boundaries of .the aforementioned local agencies. Much of the territory is already within the boundaries of the cities and the Irvine Ranch Water District. LAFCO has yet to develop and determine spheres of influence for the County Sanitation Districts. (By law, LAFCO must adopt the spheres of influence for all the sanitation dis- tricts by January 1, 1985. The scope of the draft EIR should be expanded to address the issue of a sphere of influence for OCSD-13.) . .... September 12, 1983 RE: Draft Environmental Impact Report -County Sanitation District No. 13 Formation · page 2 The draft EIR should indicate if the boundaries of the proposed OCSD-13 are the ultimate physical boundaries of the new district, and hence its sphere of influence. • If it is expected that ultimately OCSD-13 will ·serve other territory, then the =draft EIR should identify that territory. LAFCO should consider concurrently. the proposed formation of the new district and its sphere of influence. ... The specific factors which LAFCO must consider in deciding to approve or deny the project are enumerated in Section 54796 (copy attached) of the California Govern- ment Code. A review of these factors would be useful in preparing the draft EIR . Thank you for providing us the opportunity to input into the preparation of the draft EIR. We will loo~ forward to reviewing the draft upon its completion. You -may consider the undersigned as this agency's contact for this project, and all inquiries should be directed to my attention. ... Very truly yours, Local Agency Formation Commission -' of Orange County, Ca 1 iforni a . ,,, .: . .I ~ -::' y.-. ;_ .;u..u\../ u.... L;c.a.tu.l ~· ~-r.~ .. -; --,/ t1 _. Kenneth W. Scattergood Administrative Assistant ...; KWS: ff - - Directors PHILIP L. ANTHONY . KATHRYN L. BARR Officers NOBLE J. WAITE President ... ROBERTL.CLARK JOHN GARTHE First Vice President JOHN V. FONLEY JOHN GARTHE ,_. LAWRENCE P. KRAEMER. JR. AUGUST F. LENAIN LANGDON W. OWEN HENRY T. SEGERSTROM NOBLE J. WAITE J~HN '..'. FONLEY Second Vice President - - - ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NEIL M. CLINE Secretary Manager August 2·5, 1983 Ms. Hilary J. Baker Senior Engineering Aide County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Ms. Baker: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Report, County Sanitation District No. 13 Formation .This is in response to your letter dated August 19, 1983, regarding preparation of the Draft EIR for formation of District No. 13. We offer the following three_ comments: 1. The report should identify the water supply and its quality 2. to the area to be sewered. In knowing th~ water supply quality, estimates can be made of the sewage quality. The EIR should indicate the volume of sewage that will be directed to your Plant No. 1 and your Plant Na.· 2. Any significant water quality changes that may occur at Plant No. 1 as a result of this new District should be identified. This District reclaims a portion of the wastewater from Plant 1 and any significant water quality changes in that plant has an effect on the wastewater reclamation program. 10500 ELLIS AVENUE • P.O. BOX 8300 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-0300 TELEPHONE (714) 963-56611556-8260 lllli lllli ... I - ... Ms·. Hilary J. Baker August 25, 1983 Page 2 3. At the present time surface and groundwaters flowing from Carbon Canyon are of poor quality and this poor quality affects the main Orange County ~roundwater Basin. One particular source of poor quality is the La Vida Mineral Springs which discharges a wastewater with a TDS of 4,300 mg/L (see attached memo dated 3-24-81).. In the sewering of this area it would be beneficial if this poor quality water is rerouted to the sewage systems so that it would be prevented from entering the main Orange County Groundwater Basin. Very truly yours, fl~-;/~ Nereus L. Richardson District Engineer Enclosure NLR:dao ... .. - BOLSA AVE FIRST ST • r·-· I • ~~· .,.. . . 1. WARNER AVE 4 • 10 • (\a I • 20· -·mg.·-·-··-· •ELI.JS AVE GARFIELD AVE I Q > _, m :c CJ -< w m PHASE I RECOMMENDED ROUTE • --ALTERNATIVE ROUTE 0 CANDIDATE CUSTOMER 111111111 ADDITIONAL EVALUATED ROUTE SAN DIEGO FWY PHASE II ,....1'.l.'4 RECOMMENDED ROUTE -1 -1 AL TERNATIY.E ROUTE A CANDIDATE CUSTClMER GREEN ACRES PROJECT FIGURE 1-1 ,. .... ... INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: March 24, 1981 TO: Nick Richardson FROM: Jim Reilly • SUBJECT: CARBON CANYON WATER QUALITY - - The area under irt~estigati~n is that portion of the Orange County groundwater basin contained in the Carbon Canyon Creek Watershed. This .Particular area is ·not unique in its groundwater quality problems. Available water quality data indicates nuch of the northern portion of the Orange County groundwater basin suffers from poor groundwater quality, namely a high ·TDS content. However, groundwater ~n the Carbon Canyon Creek Watershed is particularly highly mineralized. ·This study deals with surface and groundwater quality in the Carbon Canyon Creek Watershed. The following is a summary of the findings (refer to Figures 1, 2, 3 for graphic illustrations) : -Excess water from a bath and swinuning pool operation at the La vid.a Mineral Springs well has been discharged into Carbon Canyon Creek over a period of many years. -La v1Ja Mineral Springs well (SWN 3S/9W-2Pl) produces· highly mineralized water. For the period 1953 -1979 TDS ranged from about 4200-4900 rng/l and chloride content ranged from 878-1062 mg/l. For the period 1953 -1957 La Vida Mineral Springs experienced an increase in TDS from 4266-4925 mg/l. -Samples taken from Carbon Canyon Creek indicate it too is highly mineralized: TDS ranged from 692-3100 mg/l, Ec·ranged from 109-4000 umhos/crn 3 , chloride ranged from 120-261 mg/l, and nitrate ranged 9-52 mg/l. The mineral concentration of Carbon Canyon Creek at a given time is probably related to discharge fluctuations at the La Vida Mineral Springs operation. -Wells in the area of Carbon Canyon Creek generally produce water of a high TDS content. TDS values of 1,000 mg/l or more are not uncor.unon. ... - • I -During the per1od 1953 -1959 wells 3S/9W-28L2, 2801, 20Cl, 19B2, and 20Fl showed a gradual yet significant increase in EC, chloride, and TDS content (20Cl, EC and TDS only.) A TDS increase continued thereafter at wells 28L2 and 20Cl and chloride content continued to increase at wells 28L2, 20Fl, 2801 and 19B2. -For the period 1953 -1979 well 21Ml has shown-a consistently high yet erratic TDS content ranging from 5.78 to 1,310 r.tg/l. It appears that discharge fro~ the La Veta Mineral Springs operation has directly· degraded groundwater in the Carbon Canyon Creek Watershed based on the following conclusions: 1. Discharge of known highly mineralized water into Carbon Canyon Creek hai.occurred over a period of many years. 2. Available water quality data indicates a historical g~ound­ water quality problem in the Carbon Canyon Creek Watershed. 3. Periods of contamination and constituents of contaoination of the previously mentioned wells correlate . 4. The contaminated wells are commonly located in the Carbon Canyon Creek Watershed within influential distance of Carbon Canyon Creek. JR:dao OCWO CiSTRIBUTION: I . -.o --{ -{ ---4 ---l ~ ____[ __( -__(_ -I I l I l l l I sos! 0 2PI 6. 1982 1300 ·-D 2JMI 0 2801 i.900 '1 20C J l!J 20FI 0 28L2 4750 0.. N ...J 10001·-I . \ h I "'" I \ --14600 ~ :;J: ' ~ "\! / 0::: O'I 0 E La.. ---Vl ' 0 en t-E 850 -~ 4450 - Vl 0 I- 4300 4150 . ~oo l I I . I I I I · I 4000 1953 1956 1959 ; 1962 1965 1968 1971 197 1• 1977 1980. YEAR CARBON CYN. CK. -LOCAL G. W. QUALITY MJ\X. ·ros .l\CH I [NED -LOCJ\J~ \-IELLS .FIGURE l l ...... vO --l --L ---L -1 ---1 _ ___(__ I I I l [ l L . I l I 1t100~ · • u 0 l/'\ N t- <l: u w 0 2PI · 6. 1982 1800·-0 21M1 0 2801 "V 20C J c 20fl 0 28L2· 1200·- 800·- 7200 7000 - 0.. N 6800 j L&J ~ ct:. 0 La.. - u 0 6600 ~ 6~00 6200 t- <( u l.&J 600 . I ~ 6000 1953 1956 1959 . 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 ·. YEAR CARBON CYN. CK -LOCAL G. W. QUALITY MJ\X. EC l\CHIEVED -LOCAL WELLS FIGURE 2 I 1111-,, _J _ I I I l I L I. l I. I I l l l I l _ ........ CTI E - u 800 650 500 350 so 1953 1956 1959 .• 0 2P1 ~ 1982 0 2 JMI G 2801 '1 20C I 8 20FI 0 28L2 --- 1962 1965 1968 1971 197~ 1977 1980 YEAR CJ\RDON CYN. CK -LOCl\L G. N. QUl\LI 'fY M/\X. CH LORI DE CON'l'EN'r -J,OCAL \·1ELLS F'H-:ttnr 1 ..i . C •. •r:i-1 r I .,. :r .............. ~ . ' .. ~-··_·. • .. ; ... ~.~ .... ... ' .. . -·~ , ri=1 , ., ~ I ' .... .... ... .. .... ., . . . ". :' .. ·-~ ...... .• ... '.'· ,• I 't • ...... ....... • .! . .. .. .... •· ;.-::-.. - ~ ........ \ ," -~" 0 t ::=.:· . ..... ;· Well .-_· .. -... -..... ·. ""· ... . .. ,. ., .,; . . ... •. \,. .. ,· ... ·.· ·. \" "··-.. .. C' .. ·-.·-... ~ ,.·· t LEGEND l9B2 \ t State Well No . (T3S/R9W-19B2) ...... ... ..... :·==: •' c ., .. .. ~ • , ......... . , .. .. .... ... ...... \ ·. . .. ···~". T,EGENO ~ .. , ....... ------·-., .. \-·. · .. . . ' .. , . ·.- :" .. ·- , . .. ·"···...,~ .... ·' i" 0 Well 793 TDS / mg/l "' f 04 0 11, 'lear I 75 -STATE OF CALIFORNIA-RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor ~LIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD S1\NTA ANA REGION r ·09 INDIANA AVl!NUI!, SUITI! ZOO I VERSIDB, CALIFORNIA 92506 -PHONE: (714) 684-9130 - - - - September 16, 1983 Hilary J. Baker Senior Engineering Aide County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca 92708 NOP: County Sanitation District~ No. 13 Formation, SCH #83090702 Dear Ms. Baker: We have reviewed the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for this project. We note that the construction of new facilites is not involved in this proposal but, rather, the acquistion of capacity in existing and future facilities. The Environmental Impacts discussion in the Initial Study reconizes that the project.will exert an indirect impact by accomodating future growth· within the proposed District boundaries. The concerns of this Board per- tain to the potential water qua-lity impacts of this future development. -In response to ~hese concerns, the DEIR should address the following: -types and amounts of waste materials projected to be served by the new districts -proposed waste treatment and disposal methods -impact of projected waste volume on capacity of existing and proposed treatment and disposal facilities -potential impacts on water quality (ocean, surface and ground waters) of projected waste generation, treatment,disposal We have received two additional Notices of Preparation for projects (Districts 2, 3, and 11 Sewage Collection System Master Plan; Updated and Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for District No. 1, the Northern Half of District No.· 6, and District No.· 7) under your jurisdiction. As .in the present proposal, each. .of th.ese projects would ·accomodate future developme.nt in its respective area. Th.e DEIR should assess the potential impacts on water quality and on sewage treatment facilities of the cumulative ultimate flows projected by these. combined proposals. We look forward to review of tha DEIR when it becomes available. ... ... ... Hilary J. Baker -2- If you have .any questions, please contact this office • Sincerely, FF..~~ Joanne E. Schneider Environmental Specialist cc: Dan Conaty -Office of Planning and Research JES:ww September 16, 1983 ... .... .... ... October 5, 1983 County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 8127 Fount~in V~llcy, CA 92708 Re: County Sanit3tion District No. 13 Formation Dear Hjlary: Pacific Te!ephone 3939 E. r>uonado Struet First Floor Anaheim. ('..allfc.1 nla 92807 This is in reply to your notification· dated August 19, 1983 regarding the impact to telc·phcine facilities due to formation of District 13. At this time, due.to lack of specific detailed information, we are unable to delc:rrnine the impact the formation of this district might create. When ~ore detailed plans are available please notify me . Very truly yours, y; '>n f:-(?,,,,,~ / /1.~ , /I ._.c.:-. -·~- ~/ J. Mccard Engineer, Liaison - C>F ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY PLANNING October 7, 1983 County.Sanitation Districts of Orange County r.•:111'1AY $H)!.M i:,,;~i.CT:.~R.1 :~.,A ROBERT G. rtSHER DI RI: C TOR OF PLAN•.,,;NG LOCA fl (JN· 12 CI VIC Cf: N ·1 E R PL r~?. A P.O. BOX ~048 SANTA ANA. CA 92102 40·18 MAILING ADiJHl.SS: P 0. HOX ·~O·l8 SANTA ANA, CA•ll/0~ ~O·l8 FILE GSR3R028 TELlPHONF.: (714) 834 ~543 _. P.O. Box 8127 .. Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attn: Hilary Baker . . -. .. .. SUBJECT: NOP, Draft EIR for District 13 Formation Dear Sirs: The Environmental Management Agency does not have any comments to transmit at this time. However, we are interested in reviewing the Draft EIR when it b~comes available. Please forward 2 copies of the Draft EIR to the Environmental Analysis Division. vhy:Z~ Henry E. Morones EMA/environmental Analysis Division HEM: jkj MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOIN T BOARDS Meeting Date July 11, 1984 -7 :30 p.m. Pos t Offic e Box 8127 l 0844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley , Calif ., 9270 8 Telephones: Area Code 71 4 540-29 10 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the more important , non -routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self -explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda mater i al summarizing the bills paid since the las t Joint Board meet i ng. To mi nimize the amount of redundancy and duplication in the agenda material and reduce the number of comments i n the Manager 's Report, we ha v e expanded the description of the agenda items in the agenda itself , par ticu l arly with regard to c hange orders and cont r acts whic h have been publicly bid and are within the c ontr act b u dget or engineer 's estima t e . Detailed change orders are included in the support i ng material as well as the b i d tabulations for the contrac ts being recommended for award. ALL DISTRICTS No . l l(a): Au t horizing Application for Federal Grants for 1984 -85 Joint Wo r ks Improvements and Additions . T he action appearing in the agenda adopts resolutions for each of t he Dist r icts authorizing execution and fil i ng of all documents necessary for State and Federa l grant applications for 1984-85 . No. ll(b): App r ova l of Ch ange Order No. 1 to Job No . PW -102 , Fi l trate L i ne to Distribution Box ; and Acceptance of Job as Complete . 1) Change Order No. 1 : Change Order No . 1 provides for f i ve changed work items at a total addition to the contract of $3 ,718. The major items of extra work include installation of 360 feet of po l ymer feed line to the secondary c l arifier d i stribution box ; cost to protect a concre t e encased electrical duct not shown on the original plans ; costs incurred due to delays caused by Districts to accommodate operating activities ; and removal of pav ing adjacent t o the secondary clarifier distribution box . There is no extension of time associated with this work. The staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 . 7/11/84 2) Closeout: The contractor , Peter C . David Company, has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified time . Staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached with the agenda material authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the final closeout agreement, and filing of the Notice of Completion as requ i red . The final contract price is $37,418. No . ll(c): Approval of Chang e Order No . 1 to Job No. PW-106 , Replace "C" Headworks Conveyor at Plant No . 2; and Acceptance of Job as Complete. 1) Change Order No . l : Change Order No . 1 covers three additional items of work adding $1,407 to the contract plus a time extension of 41 calendar days. Included in the change order is removal of an air line not shown on t he original plans ; reconnection of a drain line to the new catch basin; and changing of elevations of subgrade due to a conflic t in finish elevations between two existing contracts . The 41 calendar day extension is to allo w the contractor time to complete the above items of work. The staff recommends app roval of Change Order No . 1 . 2) Closeout: The contractor , George and B . Morgan Company , has ful filled all con tr actual obligations within the specified and approved extensions of time . Staff recommends adoption of the resolution attach ed with the agenda material authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execut i on of the final closeout agreement , and filing of the Not ic e of Completion as required . There was one change order to thi s contract (No . 1 above) for a net addition of $1407, plus a 41 calendar da y time extension . The final contract price is $77 ,857 . No . ll(d): Authorizing the Selection Committee to Negotiate with John Caro llo Engineers for Dige ster Gas Utilization Study. The Joint Works Treatment Plants currently produce approximately 3 ,000,000 cubic feet per day of digester ga s as a by -pr oduct of the sewage treatment process. The majority of this methane gas is util iz ed to fue l internal combustion eng in es that drive our large pumps , blowers and compressors. Currently , there are 25 internal combustion engines at the two treatme nt plants with a total ·installed horsepower of app roxima tely 12,700 h .p . The 1983 Joint Works Master Plan sets forth the need for a new outfall booster station at Plant No . 2 and a new headworks at Plant No . 1 . Preliminary design studies have indicated that the prime mo ve rs to drive the pumps for these facilities wou ld require six additional engines . In discussions with AQMD last year , they -2- 7/11/84 indicated there would be no problem obtaining a permit to construct and operate the new engines with i n the plants . However, recent actions by AQMD indicate a tightening of r egulations regarding NOX emissions i ncluding p r oposed rules that ma y not be possible to meet with curr ent p rov en technology on digester gas-fueled in ternal combustion engines . Th e staff is therefore recommending that a study be conducted to determine the most eff icient way to use our digester gas as an energ y sourc e and meet expect ed a ir emission requirements of AQMD o ve r the l ong term. The study wou ld assess the technological aspects as we ll as the economi cs . It would analyze if the Districts should pursue central electrical power gen erat i on (i .e ., with alternate eng ine s t ha t can now meet AQMD standards ) and phase in electrical motors for prime movers as t he inter nal combus tion eng in es wear out (centra l generation may also allow other significant operating ef fici encies); whether we should continue using individual g as engines and seek the technology to meet emission standards; or if we should sell it to either a pri va te c o n cern or to a ut ility. It is r ecommended that the stud y be perfo rmed by John Carollo Engineers as they have already comple ted much of th e baseline data in c o njunction with th e pre li minary des ign of the n ew booste r s ta tion and headworks . T he action appearing on yo ur agenda is t o authorize the Selection Committee to n egotiate an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for this s tudy . When a n agreement has been reached , th e Selection Committee wil l submit i ts recommendation to the Boards for approval. No . ll(e): Award Job No . PW-083 (Rebid), Auto Shop Hoist at Reclamation Plant No. 1 . Two bids have been received for installation of this hoist at the veh i cle maintenance fac ili ty fo r our large t rucks which we do n ot p res ently have the capabi lity to lif t. The staff is recommending award to the l ow b idder, G. E. Jepson Div ./Char l es E . Thomas Company of Paramount, California for their low bid amount of $15 ,913 . The engineer 's estimate for this work was $25 ,000 . No . ll(f): Award Job No. M-0 1 5 , La nds cape Main t enan ce . Five bids ranging from $24 ,440 to $122 ,220 were received on J une 26th for landscape ma intenance at both Plants No . 1 and 2 a nd the Seal Beach Pump S t at i on . Th e work in cludes mowing , weeding , edging , tr i mming and sweep in g of lawns , flower beds, -3 - 7/11/84 walks and paved area on a routine basis , approximately every seven days at Plants 1 and 2 and every fourteen days at the Seal Beach Pump Stat i on . The low bid amount is a tie between Tak Takamine Landscape and Maintenance who had the contract with the Districts in 1982 -8 3, and Irvine Landscape Company who had the contract for the past year . In our experience wi th the two firms , the performance of Tak Takamine has been far s uperior. Staff, therefore , recommends that a one-year purchase order contract beginning August 1, 1984 be awarded to Tak Takam i ne Landscape and Ma i ntenance of Anaheim for said work in an amount not to exceed $24 ,440 . No. ll(g): Award Specification A-120 , Twelve 4 -Wheel Electr i c Cargo Carr i ers . Thr ee bids r ang i ng from $39,33 1.0 0 to $5 3,288.40 we r e received on June 2 7 th for the purchase of twelve 4-whee l electric ca r go carriers for use at both treatment plants . These carts are used in lieu of trucks t o transport workers and their tools and equipment for maintenance throughout the treatment p l ant s ites . One i s r eplacement and t he rest are to cover the added ma intenance act i v i t i es of t h e exp ande d treatment fac ilities . It is the s t aff 's recommendation that a purchase orde r be i ssued to Taylor Dunn Manufactur i ng Company in the amoun t of $39 ,331 .00 , plus tax for the twelve cargo carriers. No . l l(h): Award Spec i ficatio n A-121 , Three 4 -Wheel E l ectr i c Personnel Carriers . Two bids at a low of $9,384 .75 and a high of $9 ,480 .00 were received on June 27th for the purchase of three 4-whee l electric personnel carriers used by the p l ant opera t ors to make the i r rou n ds on al l three shifts . Use of these personnel carr i ers al l ows =or more eff i c i ent use of their t ime . It is the staff 's recommendatio n that a purchase order be iss u ed to Taylo r Dunn Manufa c t u r i ng Company in the amo u nt of $9 ,384 .75 plus tax for t h e three person n el carriers . No . ll(i ): Authority to Receive Bids and Award a Purchase Order Contract for 16 Replacement Dresser Couplings for Metering Facilities, Specification No . E-153 . The Direc t ors will recall that one of the items requi red of the Distr i cts by EPA i n connection wi th t he iss u ance of our 30 l (h)/ NPDES Permit is the replacement of seve·ral influent magnetic flow meters . The Boards awarded the purchase contract in February and -4 - 7/11 /84 recently authorized a contract for fabrication of the adaptor spools. In preparation for the installation we have inspected the existing Dresser couplings and determined that it would be prudent to replace them at this time to ensure the integrity of the metering installations. While the Dresser couplings are a proprietary item and must be replaced in kind, the Districts expect bids from several different suppliers . Because time is of the essence in order to comply with the EPA requirements , the staff if requesting the General Manager be authorized to receive the bids and award a purchase order contract for these replacement couplings in an amount not to exceed $12,000 plus tax and delivery. No. ll(j): Actions Concerning Standard Sewage Samplers for Monitoring Influent and Effluent Streams. Att ached wit h your agenda material is a detailed staff report concerning the need for re l iable samplers for both influent and effluen t streams for analytica l and reporting purposes to meet our internal operating needs and EPA requirements . Staff recommends the actions appearing on the agenda to receive and file the staff report; approve the fabrication , installation and covering of the sixteen standard samplers by Distr i cts ' force account work , Job No . PW-113 , in an amount not to exceed $196,400 ; and to authorize issuance of a purchase order t o Randolf Austin Company for the purchase of sixteen proprietary Model 880 peristaltic pumps for use in the samp l ers, Specif i cation No . E -154 , for an amount not to exceed $28 ,240 (included in above maximum amount), plus tax and freight . No . ll(k): Appointing District Representatives for Small Claims Court Activities. On occasion , i t is necessary for us to collect unpaid obligations owed to the Districts through action i n the Small Claims Court of the West Orange County Judicial District . Resolution No. 84 -114 amends ou r existing authorization to add new employees allowed to represent the Districts and delete persons no longer employed . No . 1 1(1): Authorizing Ass i g n ment of Contracts for K. P . Li ndstrom and Associates . The Districts have entered into agreements with K. P . Lindstrom and Associates for consulting services in connection with the Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, the Ultimate Solids Environmenta~ Impact Statement and the Districts ' 30l(h) Waiver application. The firm has recently incorporated and has requested that their contracts pe changed to reflect their new name, K. P. Lindstrom , Incorporated. The staff recommends approval of the assignments . -5 - 7/11/84 DISTRICT 2 No . ll(m): Orderi~g Annexation No. 50 -Ca s ada Annexation to County Sanitation District No . 2 . This .55 acre annexation is for the connection of an existing residence to th2 sewer facil ities i n the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Moler Drive in t he City of Anahe i m . The l ocal sewering agency will be th e City of Anahe i m . All appl i cable fees have been paid and the annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exc hanges for an n exing properties. Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to your agenda material ordering Annexation No. 50 . No . ll (n): Approv al of Addendum No . 1 to P l ans and Specificat ions f or Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2 -24 ; an d Award of Contract . At the May meeting, the Board approved plans and specifications for t he enlarg e ment and upgrading of the p ump station located in the Car bon Canyon Regional Park and the cons truction of a n ew parallel force main from th e pump station to the crest of t he dam. The two actions appearing on your ag enda are: (1) Approval of Addendum No . 1: This addendum clarifies the v ariabl e depth over conduits and s pecifie s that c oncrete encasement is not r equired . It also modifies one sheet of the plans . (2) Award of Contract : Eight bids were rece i ved ranging from a h i gh of $203,486 .00 t o a low of $138,630 .80 s ubmit ted by subgrade Construction Corporation of Orange. The engineer's esti mate was $2 00 ,000 . The staff recommends appr oval of Addendum No. 1 and award of the contract t o Subgrade Construction Corpo ration for their low bid of $138 ,630 .80 . No . ll(o): Approving Selection Committee Certific at i on and Agreement with Berryman and Stephens o n, Incorporated for Design of the Taft Interceotor Sewer, Contract No . 2 -6 -2, an d City of Oran g e Street I mp rov e ments. At the May 9th meeting , the Board authorized the Selec tion Committee to solicit proposals and negot iate for the design of Contract No . 2 -6 -2 , t he Distr ict's Taft I ntercepto r Sewer , f r om the Santa Ana River Interceptor to Gl assell S tree t . The contract also incorporates City of Orange AHFP street improvements in accordance with an approved agreement .between the District and -6 - ,_ 7/11/84 City. This project is a cooperative effort between t he City of Orange and District No . 2 which will result in consi d erabl e savings for both t he District and th e City . The Selection Committee has negotiated an agreement for the work for a total amount not to exceed $26,950 as follows: Engineering services (direct labor, plus overhead @ 140 %, not to exceed Direct expenses , not to exceed Soils investigation, not to exceed Net profit Total contract, not to exceed $21,175 450 1 ,725 3,500 $26,950 The proposals have been reviewed by the City of Orange and the Districts are in receipt of a letter outlining the breakdown of the design fees which shall be prorated between the Sanita tion District and the City of Orange based upon the final construction est imate for s ewer work and street work , as well as prorating the cost of the total surveying service to be provided by the City of Orange. The estimate is 78% for the District and 22 % for t he City. The actions appearing on your agenda are to receive and file the Se l ection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adopt a resolution approving an agreement with Berryman and Stephenson, Inc . Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting documents . DISTRICT 7 No . ll (p): Ordering Annexation No. 94 -Moody Annexation to County Sanitation District No . 7 This 2 .04 acre annexation is for the connection of three single family dwellings in the vicinity north of Crawford Canyon Road and westerly of Newport Boulevard on Greenwald Lane in an unincorporated territory of the County of Orange . The local sewering agency will be the 7th Sewer Maintenance District. All applicable acreage and processing fees have been paid pursuant to the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties . A one time service fee of $500 per residence has been paid in lieu of the District receiving a tax allocation on the property. The staff recommen ds that Annexation No . 94 (Moody Annexation ) be ordered. -7 - 7/11/84 No. ll(q): Or dering Annexation No. 105 -Cormier Annexat i on to County Sanitati on District No . 7 This 1.23 acre annexation is for the c onnection of a single family dwelling in the vicinity of Lemon Heights Drive a n d La Cuesta Drive in an unincorporated Coun ty territory . The local sewering agency will be the 70th Sewer Maintenance District . All applicabl e acreage and processing fees have been paid pursuant to the terms of the negot ia ted agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties . A one time service fee of $500 has been paid in lieu of the District r eceiv ing a tax allocation on the property . The staff recommends that Annexation No . 10 5 (Cormier Annexation) be ordered . No . ll(r): Ordering Annexation No. 106 -O'Toole Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 This .89 acre a nnexation is for the connection of a sing l e family dwel ling in t he vicinity of Overh ill Drive and Sirrine Drive in an unincorporated County territory . The local sewer i ng agency will be the 70th Sewer Maintenance Di strict . All applicable acreag e and processing fees have been paid pursuant to the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties . A one time service fee of $500 has been paid in lieu of the District receiving a tax allocation on t he proper t y . The staff r ecommends that Annexation No . 10 6 (O 'Toole Annexation) be o r dered. No. ll(s): Authorizing the General Manager and General Couns el to Engage an Appraiser in Con nect i on with an Easement f or t he South Irvine Lift Station, Contract No. 7-7. The South Irvine Lift Station is proposed to be located on County of Orange property in the John Wayne Airport clear zone i n the vicinity of Main Street west of MacArthur Blvd . It wi ll be necessary to obtain a permanent easement from the County for the South Irvine Lift Station site and, thus , a property appraisal is needed. It is anticipated that plans and speci fications for the lift station will be presented to the Board of Directors in August , 1984. The County of Orange has indicated that a temporary right-of-entry will be provided pending resolution of the easement purchase price and execution of an agreement . The staff requests au thority for the General Manager and General Counsel to engage a firm to conduct an appraisal of the pump sta ti on site in an amount not to exceed $7,500. -8 - .. ~. 7/11/84 No . ll(t): Approval of P lan s and Specif ica tions for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer , Contract No. 7-8 In May 1983, the Director s engaged Bo y le Engineeri n g Corporation to prepare plans and specifications for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer. This trunk sewer is t he most critic al n eeded l in e in the recently updated mas ter plan for District No . 7 and wil l serve the Irvine Business Center area . The plans and speci f ic a tions h ave now been completed . A t enta ti ve bid date of August 28, 1984 has been establi shed . The Directors had previously approved designing t he project for alt erna t e sewage flow r ate s . One rate serve s the District's needs and requires a 39 -inch sewer , wh ile the second prov i des capacity for County Sanitation District No . 14 serving the Irv i ne Ranch Water District (IRWD) territory with a 60 -inch sewer , should that Distr ic t be formed and IRWD decides to participate. Prior to awarding the contract, ant icipate d for S eptember 1 2, 1984, IRWD would be required to decide i f they wish to pay fo r the larger pipe size to provide Distric t No . 14 capacity. The e ngineer's est imate for the alte rnati ves is shown below: MAX . PIPE SI ZE CSD #7 Onl y 3 9 " CSD #7 + CSD #14 60 fl AVG . DAILY DESIGN F LOW 10. 5 MGD 43 . 5 MGD ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $3 ,600 ,000 $5,200,000 Staff rec o mm en ds approval of the plans a n d specifications . ALL DISTRICTS No . 13 and 14: Report of the Executiv e Committee The Committee met on June 27th. Th e report of their discussions and recommend e d actions for consideration by the Boards was mailed separately to Directors on June 29th , ahead of the regular agenda mailing, to afford ample t i me for th e Board members to review their ind ividual District 's 19 84 -85 budget r e commend ation s. The bound budget book i n cluded a narrative of the proposed budgets . If an y Director wishes additional information pleas e call Wayne Sylvester or Bill Butler at 540 -2910. No . 15 a n d 16: Closed Session T he Boards wi ll convene in closed session to recei ve a report on pers onnel matters from the Executi ve Committee. -9 - 7/11/84 No. 17: Adoption of Gan n Initiative (Proposition 4) Annual Appropriations Limit. The Gann Initiative limits State and local government appropriations of proceeds from tax sources to an amount based on changes in population and the cost of l i v i ng over the 1978 -79 base yea r. Each year , the Boards must fix the limit in accordance with the Initiative. In 1984-85 ''proceeds of taxes " are wel l within the appropriations limits as set forth below : 1984 -85 Gann 1984-85 Proceeds Districts Limitation of Taxes 1 $1,658 ,654 $ 122 ,928 2 6 ,897 ,324 1,046.700 3 8 ,6 86 ,347 3,39 8 ,774 5 1 ,7 86 ,119 925,555 6 1 ,039 ,7 06 275,478 7 2,075,088 [1,537 ,682) 11 1 ,825 ,690 902 ,1 10 No . 18: Receive, File and Approve Interim Building Committee Report; and Authorizing Building Modifications to Provide Temporary Office Space . The Joint Chairman has asked the Bui lding Commi t t ee t o review the Distric t s' office spac e requiremen t s . The Committee met on June 26th to review the need for additional administrative office space and has submitted an interim report which is attached with the agenda material . The committee is recommending that certain temporary measures be taken to satisfy immediate office space requirements (Pha se I) and has directed th e staff to report bac k with further information c oncern ing permanent office space requirements (Pha se II). The actions appear i ng on you r agenda are to rece i ve , file and approve the Interim Building Committee report and to authorize Phas e I modifica tions by force account work and acquisition of equipment in accordance with the Districts' purchasi ng procedures , to provide temporary off ice space in the Administration building and Indus tria l Waste inspect ors ' offices for a ma ximu m amount not to exceed $52 ,000 , plus applicable sales taxes and freight. No . 19: Purchase of Nine (9) Ashbrook -Simon -Hartley CWinkleoress) Belt Filter Presses. At the May 9 , 1984 meeting of the Joint Boards, the Directors authorized the General Manager , in consultation with the Joint Chairman and the General Counsel, to negotiate the purchase of -10- 7/11 /84 nine bel t f ilter presses to replace exis tin g worn o u t and inefficient sludge dewate rin g equipment to enable u s to meet our i ncreasing sludge dewatering requirements at Plants No . l and 2 . On June 28th , staff completed negotiat i ons for purchase of the nine Winklepresses in accordance with specification No . E-152 and associated control centers , and a set of spare belts for the nine units . Following are the recommended actions for consideration: 0 0 0 Authorize i ssuance of a p u rchase c ontract i n t he amount of $1 ,71 0 ,000 .00 plu s applicable sales tax , to Ashbroo k - S imon -Hart l ey , I n c. (Winklepress~ for n i ne (9) Wink l epresses in accordance with specification No . E-152, to be delivered F .O .B . Plant No . 1 . This price is approximately 10% greater than the price negotiated in 1980 for the purchase of four ident i cal units i nsta lled at Plan t No. 1 . Authorize is suance of a purchase contract in th e amount of $166 ,500.00 plus applicabl e sales tax, to Ge rlich-Mi tche ll Inc . for nine (9) contr o l centers for th e belt filt er pre s s es in acco rdance wi th specification No . E-152, to be d el i vered F .O .B . Plant No . 1. Authorize i ssuan ce of a p urch ase con tract in the amount of $43,8 84 .00 pl us app li cab l e sales tax to Gerl i ch -Mitchell for nin e (9) spare belts for t h e belt filter presses , to be delivered F .O .B . Plant No . 1 . Ashbrook-Simon-Hart l ey will also furnish the Districts a spare hydraulic pack and a gear drive unit wor th $9 ,5 85 .00 for no additional charge if the Di str i cts place this order dur ing July , 198 4 . The app roved 1 984 -85 CORF budget i nc ludes $2 ,65 0,000 for purchase of the presses a n d associated design engineer ing services . Last month the Boards approved the design contract for installation of t he belt presses ; and authorized filing of a Notice of Exemption under CEQA because it is an equipment replacement project. The tota l cost of the presses , control center and spare be l ts is $1 ,920 ,384 .00 plus appl ic abl e sales tax. Th e J oin t Chairman , General Counsel a nd staff recommen d approval of the proposed actions. DISTRICT NO . 5 No . 27 : Adoption cf User Fees for 1984-85 Enclosed with the agenda material for District No . 5 Di rectors is a separate staff report recommending that the current years ' user fee schedule be adop ted for the 1984-85 fiscal year also . -11- 7/11 /84 DISTRICT NO . 6 No . 30: Adootion of Use r Fees for 1984-85 Enc l osed with the agenda material for District No . 6 Directors is a separate staff report recommending that t he current years ' user fee schedule be adopted for the 1984 -85 fiscal year also . DISTRICTS 2 AND 7 Nos. 33 , 34 and 35 : Actions Re Formation of Prooo sed District No . 13 Enclosed with the agenda material is a n Interim Report of the District No . 13 S teer ing Committee re comme nding the actions appearing on the agenda list i ng relative to the formation of proposed District No . 13. DISTRICT NO . 7 No . 38 : Actions Re Industrial Waste Di sc harge Permit No. 7 -162, Electrolurgy , Incorporated . In January, the Board of District No. 7 approved a stipulated agreement with Electro lurgy , Inc . providing terms and conditions to allow time for t he firm to install pretreatment equipment to bring its sewerage system discharge into comp li an ce with t he Districts ' Ind u stria l Waste Ordinance. The agreement r equir ed that the system be installed and operational by May 31 , 198 4 . Electrolurgy has been unable to complete insta llation of the equipment and has requested an extension of time . Sta ff has advised the firm 's owner that certai n conditions must be met b efore the request can be considered . Th e condition s are yet to be satisfied and the staff and Gener al Couns el have been meeting with Electrolurgy's representatives in an attempt to resolve this matter. A separa t e report will be forwarded to the Dir ecto rs of District No. 7 prior to the Board meeting outlining t he staff and General Co unsel's recommen dations . -12 - RE: AGENDA ITEM #7 TELEPHONES: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 P. O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) July 3, 1984 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS It is with considerable gratification that I was elected Joint Chairman last month and nominated for the position on June 13th. The enthusiasm you showed might make it academic to ask for your support on July 11th for the one-year term. However, the role is so important that I do not feel it proper not to ask for your support again. My qualifications seem to me to be in three categories, as follows: 1) During my term of service to the Sanitation Districts, I have served on many committees including time as Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Committee. Thus, I have familiarity with many issues being addressed. 2) My third term election as city councilman in the City of Tustin displays an awareness of the political process. Whatever we do must be highly visible and. acceptable to voters. 3) My profession for the last 40 years has been as a professional engineer. This highly technical background enables me to grasp technical issues quickly and thus direct the appropriate course of action. It is with considerable humble feelings that I view the fine job done by past Joint Chairmen. In no way would I claim to excel any of them. The esteem held by the Orange County Sanitation Districts nationwide reflects the kind of job that has been done. My perception is that we are running a relay race and I may be priviledged to carry the baton for a lap. If you give me your vote, I pledge to do my very best to be worthy of that selection. Sincerely, u~ Dick Edgar -R·E: =-Ac ~NDA ITEM No . 18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS June 28, 1984 INTERIM REPORT OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE Meeting Date: June 26, 19 84 .. ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SPACE REQUIREMENTS of ORANGE CO UNTY. CALI FORNIA P.0 .BOX8127 10844 EL LIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VA L LEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 (7 14) 540-2910 (7 14) 962-2411 The Committee wa s con v ened to review the office space needs of the Districts for existing and projected future staffing levels . The members toured the administration building to observe the existing off ice space utilization and concluded that the current space for existing emploY.ees is very congested a n d inefficient. Due to the lack of space, areas have been converted to uses other than that for which they were originally designed to accommodate personnel and computer equipment . Further, it is necessary to immediately provide added working space for new positions recently approved by the Boards' for the managment office reorganization. After a preliminary review of the anticipated needs, the Committee recommends that the added space requirements be undertaken in two phases: Phase I -Building Modifications for Temporary Office Space In order to satisfy iwmediate space requirements the Committee is recommending that certain interim measures be taken to better utilize the existing floor space. The upstairs conference/training room contains approximately 1300 square feet that could be converted to office use at a relatively nominal cost . A trailer could then be purchased and located in the parking lot immediately west of the administration building to provide a temporary conference /training facility. In addition to the above proposed interim modifications of the administration building , temporary office space is needed to house new inspectors being hired to enforce the Districts' Industrial Waste Ordinance. The existing inspectors now use the old warehouse building within the plant grounds for offices. This building could be modified to add additional office area for the new employees . The estimated cost of the above modifications is as follows: Administration building temporary remodeling including elec trical, lighting, and air conditioning modifications Partitioning Industrial Waste office remodeling Trailer for conference/tra i ning room $20,000 10,000 10,000 $40,000 12,000 $52,000 plus tax and freight These abov e mo difica t ions would sa tis fy the o f fice s pace requ ireme nts until a perma nent a dd itio n could be d e s igned a nd constructed . The p e r manent addition is proposed t o be accomplished under Ph ase II. The Building Committee recommen d s tha t the Boa rds author i z e sta ff t o pe r form the Pha se I building modificat ions by force accou nt work and purchase the equip ment in acco rdance with the Districts' p urchasing procedures for a t o tal amount no t to excee d $52,000 . Phase II -Permanent Office Spa ce Add it ion Based on the current staff i ng l e vels and anticipated future p e rsonnel requiremen ts , it is projected that t h e number of employ ees occup ying the administration b uilding will almost double , from the current l e vel of 54 to 103 , over the ne x t 10 years. ·rt is the c o ncensus of the Commit t ee that this demand , coupled with t h e need to alleviate the congestion i n the existing bu i lding, will require a minimum increase of 14 ,000 square feet of office space. The Committee discussed a conceptual plan for adding a new wing to t h e east side of the e x isting administration off ice (adjacent to the Board Room) for permanent add i tio nal office space and directed the staff to refine t he concept and cost estimates a nd report back at the next Committee meeting. LABORATORY SPACE REQUIREMENTS Staff r e p o rted that the Dis t ricts ' proposed 30l(h) Waiver/NPDES permit will require an extensive ocean mon i toring program. However, because the final prog r am is yet to be def i ned by EPA , staff recommended that consider ation of laboratory space requirements be held in abeyance pending receipt of the f inal program. Once defined, a determinatio n b y the Dis tricts as to what elements of the p l a n would be c o nducted in-house and what elements would be contracted for with outside firms would dicta te the laboratory space requirements . Attachments Respectful ly submitted, BUILDING COMMITTEE -2- Norma n E. Culver , Chairman Richard E . Buck Buck Catlin Gerald Mu l len J ames Neal Charles Sylvia e. 1.--l 1 s p._ ..._/ e:.r-J u e. ~: lr<o Po s~o 1e:t11PoRAi:2'( IRA-I L..e.FZ"'=' . '; ® ® ® ® ~ ~ ~ ~ f'rc-01"'0€-e..p P..r:/t1IN1e1'tz.ATION r-t::::r 't::S5f \(DJ ~IJ 11,....c::> 11..JC. P... OOJjlONl 1Q_Y m ~ ~L ~ tt;Xl~'f1N& __ __, c .. e-oiv-10~·1 -n-=- r1SJ Z'ncl <Slo 12:-( F"~fll 10NS .211c::::I s10 ~-( f"A1<.·n·r10 NS ,, , , , ,~ , , L f?<l~fl~G e::.r-lco1l'li::.er=t 1t-l c.. AHO ,0...0)11N l ~FA"fl0N "u IVOI Nc;..1 ©® t;.F->TlP f'l>-fZl'-IN"' L..c>f ~(~ f"~ J I I I I I'--'---. . \I) ~ fl!! ll ll/ll I 111/l ll/lfJ @ ~o 5:::A.l-E=:.. . ., flOI FLA N-BLJIL.,D IN G AOD 1fl o NS xs:aw wwww"t:'«t•..,. ._, .....,._ Le©ef'lo P HA?E:. l -Ar:?M 1 N 1 -o·fRA.f 1 01~ yloo1flCA..f l oN fV~ Te r~f1o~A.P..-{ off"l c:.~ csp~ce fl~A.'7.:i~ J!-Pe:-~M~N ENI a 1:-r.r 1 ~e:. ~F~E. A.oo 1110 l'J P05~1 f3~~ fLl fi.J ~e. L-.A..f?O~r~·rt)FZ..'( AOD l1'1G'l~CO roe 1~ 0 lN C? BO ! (h) MO N t lo ~ING r~o~F2J.-M •• , i . I I 1 I I ! I i ::s_: ·•:,; 2 o r;===::::===.===:=r=;=filr.=I ~ 11 ~·•;!Iii !I~ : ,~!I :; ::" ] ~ :1 ~ ~"I I I• ~;.., I ~ ~,~. ·-1 I t "jl -:~. :J ") "• ... J I , ''.~ 1 :t I i ! I ~ i,I . • :o-. I I I _l ~-., .. :, II :: ~ '.J I I I :,, 11 .' 1.._· I I _l ' ; I ~ •I • . I I A l . . . i 11 fil 'I ~~ Ii !~U ~ ii •• r, ,1J I ,,_~," . I ,, '~ si-. I ,,__ · V-'" I ~:1t , t 1. r~1 -.....J ii ··• ~ • ~-• 1 ·~ • I >;'1 ., r..• i! :....:..:..:. . ' ·~~ I I ~t ".j ill& ~ ~ --~~-I ~1 r-9~ // .·I N I ---I I . r- ! ----\ I . I \ \ \ -... ) .. \ '- ,,,. ~ . ' \ \ . ' \ \ \ \ ., \ \ . \ I L -I z., I I t -1 I \>\ I . I c:. l !=~----., t= .· I .... ~ ~ I 6' _J rij~-· --~T· --. l .2.?L I :;: : ,~,~ T. "'?.. ~ L_·---. -'--~---:' 1984 J\DMINISTRf\TION/ENGINEERING BUILDING ST UDY 6/20/84 ENGINEERING OPERATIONS IN DUSTRIAL WASTE ACCTG & FI NJ\NCE MAINT . MGMT PERSONNEL STOnAGE PERSONNEL STOR AGE PERSONNE L STORAGE PERSONNEL STORJ\GE PERSONNEL PER SONNEL 1984 17 ---5 ---5 ---11 ---7 9 3 years 7* + 2 1100 --200 7* + 11 400 2 +550 2 5 5 yea rs 2 50 --50 3 5 0 2 +300 --2 10 years 2 50 --50 4 50 3 +400 --2 TOTAL /\DDITION 13 500 --300 18 500 7 1250 2 9 *Existing Personnel, now in temporary quarters outside building . NEW EMPLOYEE SUMMARY J\.dmin/Engrg: 14* + 35 = 49 ADMINISTRATION/ENGINEERING BUILDI NG SIZE ESTIMATES 1. Employee Work Space : 2 . Halls, Walls, etc . 3 . Storage, Records Vaults, Computer Space 4. Stairs · 5 . Employee Rooms 6 . Restrooms (2 sets) 7, Conference/Auditor 's Roo ms (2) Total 6 ,630 1, 560 2 ,550 700 1100 800 1 I J100 14 ,0llO ?~ " RE: AGENDA ITEM #27 CA) July 3, 1984 To: Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 COUNTY SANI TATION DISTR ICTS of 0 RANGE C OUNTY , C ALI FORNIA P.O .BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92 70 8 (714) 54 0-2910 (7 14) 962-2411 Subj: Proposed 1984-85 Budget for County Sanitation District No. 5 The purpose of this letter is to present a recommendation regarding the District's supplemental user fee schedule for the proposed 1984-85 fiscal year. BACKGROUND In 1981, the District 5 Board of Directors adopted a supplemental user fee program to make up the shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and provide additional financing for both operations and major rehabilitation work on the District's collection and transportation system. During the public hearings held to present the proposed supplemental user fee program to District customers, the public was advised that the proposed fee was expected to increase 77% in the 1982-83 fiscal year and remain at that level for several years. The District has been able to delay any increase in the supplemental user fee over the past three years due to a significant decline in inflation, receipt of favorable bids on various District and Joint Works construction and rehabilita- tion projects, and delays in various major plant projects, all of which have reduced District expenditures well below previously projected levels. The District has not increased either the supplemental user fee or its connection fees since 1981. 1984-85 BUDGET PROJECTIONS The proposed District 5 budget projections reflect $868,000 in supplemental user fees, of which $264,000, or 30%, of these fees are allocated to District operations. The remaining 70 %, or $604,000, is allocated to the District's Accumulated Capital Outlay (ACO) f und to provide financing for various District force main and pump station rehabilitation and improvement projects as well as for the District's share of the Joint Works facilities rehabilitation program. The present supplemental user fee levels ($26.40/year for a single family residence, $15.85 per unit for a multi-unit residence) are sufficient in the upcoming year to enable the District to fully fund both its operating and capital budgets. However, it may not be sufficient in fiscal year 1985-86 to support the anticipated increases in both operating costs and facilities rehab- ilitation requirements. The staff recommends that the current fee schedule (attached) be continued for 1984-85 . It is anticipated that a decision on the formation of District No. 14 will be forthcoming during the next seve ral months. If District No. 14 is formed, it could have a favorable financial impact on District No. 5. Once this is known, the staff will update the f i nancial projecti ons and subm i t a report to Board of Directors District No. 5 Page Two July 3, 1984 the Board prior to next year's budget sessions on the anticipated level of user fees needed beginning in 1985-86 and thereafter to finance the District 's oper a - tions , maintenance and rehabilitation costs . The Directors are aware that a state constitutional amendme n t initiative , which will restrict the Districts' ability to increase its supplemental user fees, will be considered by the voters in the November, 1984 general election . If it passes, this initiative (termed "Jarvis IV") will require that any future user fee increase (or increases retroactive to August 15, 1983) that exceed the annual CPI increase must receive two-thirds approval from the voters . Obviously, this would severely restrict the Districts' ability to cover escalating operating costs . Please call Wayne Sylvester or Bill Butler should you have any questions regarding the District's budget or the recommendation to retain the current user fee schedule for 1984-85 . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRicr NO . 5 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE SINGLE UNIT PARCEIS CONNEcrED METER SIZE 1983-84 ANNUAL FEE l" or less $ 26.40 l~" 52 .50 2" 105.00 3" 210.00 4" 420.00 6" 840.00 8" 1,680.00 If a parcel contains more than one water meter, then the charge aplicable to each meter shall be added to- gether, and the sum levied against the parcel . MULTI-UNIT PARCELS PER UNIT $ 15.85 - - RC'. -...... ....,, I L. AGENDA ITEM #30(A) July 3 , 19 8 4 To: Board of Directors County Sanitation District No . 6 COUNT Y SANI TA TIO N DIST RI CT S of 0 qANG E C OUNTY , C AUFORN!A P.O.BOX8127 10844 ELLI S AVE NU E FOUNTAI N VALLEY, CALI FORN IA 9270 8 (71 4)540-2910 (714)962-2 411 Subj : Proposed 1 984 -85 Budget for County Sanitation District No. 6 The purpose of this let ter is to p r esent a recommendation regar ding the Distr i ct 's suppl emental user fee schedule for the proposed 1 984-85 fiscal year. BACKGROUND On June 9, 1983 , the District 6 Boa r d of Directors adopted a supplemental user fee program to make up the shortfall of ad valorem tax revenues and provide additional financ i ng for operations . During the publ ic hear ings held to present the proposed supplemental use r fee program to Dis tr ict customers, the public was advised that the proposed fee was expected to increase 77% in the 1984-85 fiscal year and remain at that level for several years . However, because of the significant inflationary decline and delays in major p r ojects, it appears as if the District can forego a n increase in 1984-85 . 1984-85 BUDGET PROJECTIONS The p r oposed District 6 budget projections reflect $787 ,000 in supplemental user fees, all of which are allocated to the District 's operating fund . The present supplemental user fee levels ($26 .40/year for a single family residence, $15 .85 per unit for a multi-unit residence, $18 .90/1000 square feet fo r commercial/ industrial/other customers) are sufficient in the upcoming year to enable the District to fully fund its operating budgets . However, it may not be sufficient in fiscal year 1985-86 to support the anticipated increases in operating costs and rehabilitation work . The staff recommends that the current fee schedule (attached) be continued for 1984-85 . It is anticipated that a decision on the formation of District No . 14 will be forthcoming during the next several months. If District No . 14 is formed , it could have a favorable financial impact on District No . 6 . Once this is known, the staff will update the financial projections and submit a report to the Board prior to next year's budget sessions on the anticipated level of user fees needed beginning in 1985-86 a nd thereafter to finance the Distr ict's opera- tions, maintenance and rehabilitation costs. The Directors are aware that a state constitutional amendment initiative , which will restrict the Districts ' ability to increase its supplemental user fees, will be considered by the voters in the November , 1984 general election. If it passes, this initiative (termed "Jarvis IV") will require that any future user fee increase (or increases retroactive to August 15 , 1983) that exceed the annual CPI increase must receive two-thirds approval from t~e voters . Obviou sly, this would severely restrict the Districts' ability to cover escalating operating costs. Please call Wayne Sylves t er or Bill Butler s hould you have any questions regarding the District's budget or the recommend a tion to retain the current user fee schedule for 1984-85. Class of User Single-Family Dwellings . Multi -Family Dwellings/Mobile .Somes Commercial./ Industrial/Other (government buildings, utilities, non-profit organizations, etc.) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE Basis of Charge Charge per dwelling unit Charge per dwelling unit Charge per 1000 square feet of building 1983-84 Annual Rate $ 26.40 1 5 .85 18. 90 6 /2 0/84 Minimum Annual Charoe per Unit $ 26. 40 1.5 . 85 18 . 90 :ondominiurns: Condominiums are considered single-family dwellings . However, in --recognition of the limited potential use of small , converted dwelling units, the own e r of a single unit may apply for a reduction of the annual rate from $26 .40 to $15.85, provided the unit has less than 1.1 plumbing fixture units (determined as follows) : Single bath with tub, water closet and wash basin Kitchen with sink and/or dishwasher Laundry facilities Fixture Units Assigned by Uniform Building Code 7 fixture uni ts 2 fixture uni ts 2 fixture units / ll fixture units cormnercial/Industrial : To recognize buildings in this classification where the us~of the sewer system may not be directly related to the size of the building such as in a warehousing type of use, any owner of a single building may apply for a reduction of the calculated fee to a mi~imum annual :ee of $15.85, provided said building contains less than 11 plumbing fixture units (as determined above). - RE: AGENDA ITEM NO I 33 J 34 & 3,S' June 28, 1984 INTERIM REPORT OF THE DISTRICT NO. 13 STEERING COMMITTEE Meeting Date: June 27, 1984 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Q RANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P0.80X8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNT Al N VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 The Corrunittee met on June 27th to consider the proceedings relative to formation of proposed District No . 13 in accordance with the negotiated settlement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for newly annexing properties . Enclosed is the Engineer's Report and the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the proposed new District, along with a staff summary of the two reports. The reports reflect the Boards ' February 8th decision to modify the boundary of District No . 13 to exclude approximately 1300 developed properties from District No . 13 and retain them within the existing boundary of Districts Nos . 2 and 7 to facilitate formation of the new District 13. The Corrunittee also reviewed the attached separate staff report which sets forth the proposed formation schedule for District 13 and the initial financing arrangements . The Corrunittee has thoroughly considered the formation report and f inancial analysis and concurs with the recorrunendations that the following actions be taken by the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos . 2 and 7 at the July 11th meeting: 1) Approve District 13 formation schedule as follows: July 11th Boards Receive/File Draft EIR Aug. 8th EIR Hearing Aug . 27th EIR Corrunent Period Ends Sept . 20th Final EIR Mailed to Boards Oct . 10th Adopt EIR Nov. 7th LAFC Hearing 2) Receive , file and approve the Engineer 's County Sanitation District No . 13 Formation Report, prepared by Lowry and Associates. 3) Receive and file Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of County Sanitation District No. 13 prepared by Ultrasystems, Inc ., fix the corrunent period and hearing d a te, and authorize the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion, all as requir e d by CEQA. 4) Establish the following user fees for properties to be included in proposed District No. 13: o Properties within the existing Districts Nos . 2 or 7 that will be transferred to District No. 13 $ 70 .00 per year o Properties outside the new District that will be included in new District No . 13 $140 .00 per year Authorize and direct staff to immediately commence billing for the above fees for service currently being provided to the affected property owners for which the Districts are receiving no revenue. 5) Adopt following connection fee schedule: Zone A Zone B Zone C $220 /residence $ 45 /1000 sq. ft. commercial & industrial Plus annexation acreage fee in effect at time of annexation application ($1138 -$1616) $1,250/residence $ 250 /1000 sq. ft. commercial or industrial $1 ,500/residence $ 300 /1000 sq. ft. commercial or industrial The General Counsel has recommended that a single ordinance be adopted by District No. 2, on behalf of itself and District No. 7, setting the above fees. This would simplify administration of the fees inasmuch as staff would only have to administer a single ordinance instead of two separate ord i nances adopted by Districts Nos. 2 and 7. Because there are several properties presently within the existing boundaries of Districts Nos. 2 and 7 that will be detached and transferred to the new District No . 13, the Committee also authorized the staff to contact the property owners to explain the proposal. Attachments Respectfully submitted, DISTRICT NO. 13 STEERING COMMITTEE -2- Richard B. Edgar, Chairman Don R. Griffin Sam Cooper Don Roth Don E. Smith Henry Wedaa Supervisor Roger Stanton June 22, 1984 BACKGROUND COUNTY SANITATION DISTR ICTS REPORT TO THE DISTRICT NO. 13 STEERING COMMITTEE Meeting Date: June 27, 1984 -4 :00 p .m. of 0 RANGE C OUN TY , C ALI FORNIA P.O BOX 8 127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VAL LEY. CALIFORNIA 9270 8 (7 14 )540-2910 17 14) 962-24 11 The proposed formation of District No. 13 is a result of the agreement negotiated between the Districts and the County of Orange to settle the AB 8 issue of tax exchanges for newly annexing properties that would otherwise have been tributary to Districts 2 or 7 . STATUS In an interim report to the Boards of Districts Nos . 2 and 7 in February, the Committee recommended that the originally proposed boundary of District No. 13 be modified to exclude approximately 1300 developed properties from District No. 13 and retain them within the existing boundaries of Districts Nos. 2 and 7 to facilitate the formation of District No . 13. The Boards approved the Cormnittee 's recommendation and directed the consultants to change the Engineer 's Report and the Environmental Impact Report to reflect these modified boundaries. The report s have been revised and draft copies are enclosed herewith along with a staff surranary. District No. 13 formation proceedings have been filed with LAFC and it has been as s igned the designation "Orange County Reorganizatio n No. 65 -Formation of County Sanitation District No. 13 and Reorganization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7 ". FORMATION CALENDAR Pur s uant to legislation adopted in 1983, LAFC is required to adopt spheres of influence for each local governmental agency, including the Sanitation Districts, by January 1, 1985 and is in the process of doing so . In order to accommodate the proceedings, LAFC has requested that the District No . 13 formation hearing and the sphere of influence hearings for Districts 2 , 7 and 13 be conducted concurr e ntly . Two alternate schedules have been p ropos e d: -1- 45-day EIR Comment Period June 27th July 2nd July 11th Aug. 8th Aug . 27th Sept. 20th Oct . 10th Nov. 7th Special District 13 Committee Meeting Mail Cormnittee Recommendations to Boards Boards Receive/File Draft EIR EIR Hearing EIR Comment Period Ends Final EIR Mailed to Boards Adopt EIR LAFC Hearing Fast Track 30-day EIR Comment Period June 27th July 2nd July 11th Aug. 8th Aug. 13th Aug. 30th Sept. 12th Oct. 10th The November 7th hearing target has tentat i vely been set by LAFC. FINANCING In accordance with the approved boundary change ther e are 1300 developed properties that wi ll be retained in Districts Nos . 2 and 7 that have been tax-zeroed and thus, the Districts will not receive any annual ad valorem property taxes to pay for their sewerage services . However , the staff has been able to collect a one-time in-lieu service charge on 195 lots leaving a balance of 1105 ta x-zeroed lots for which no in-l ieu service fees or ad valorem taxes will be received . The Committee's above-referenced interim report pointed out that because these properties had been tax-zeroed, the issue of how they are to pay for annual operating and maintenance costs wou ld have to be addressed separately by Districts Nos . 2 and 7. One alternative under consideration would be to appl y to the Board of Superv isors for a one-time allocation of $500 per lot from Special District Augmentation Funds (SDAF), similar to the SDAF appropriation that was made for certain other properties pursuant to the original AB 8 tax exchange settlement agreement. The $500 would be set aside and invested and the interest earning s therefrom would be used to defray the O&M costs of sewerage service for those properties . -2- Informal discussions have been held with County staff and although they indicated a willingness to consider the request they expressed several concerns that would have to be addressed. Also discussed with the County was the possibility of an SDAF appropriation to cover the first year operating costs of District No. 13. The County's representatives advised that this would be an appropriate request of the SDAF funds. The staff has just completed the preliminary District budgets for 1984-85 . After evaluating the updated fiscal projections for Districts Nos . 2 and 7 as well as District No. 13 (see attached cash flow statements) it appears as if the Districts are in a position to finance their respective requirements without the need of SDAF monies. Districts Nos. 2 and 7 could set aside $500 per lot (total estimated at $552,500) for the remaining 11 05 tax-zeroed properties from annexation acreage and connection fees that have been deposited by property . owners of the territory affected by Reorganization No. 65. This amount would be invested and the interest earnings used to pay annual operating and maintenance costs for those properties . The balance of the funds deposited for the affected properties would be transferred to District No . 13. Distict No. 1 3 would use the transferred funds (representing the balance of capital facilities fees already paid by developers for property that will be included in the new District No. 13) to pay for its in i tial purchase of capacity in the Joint Treatment Works and the trunk sewer conveyance systems of Districts Nos. 2 and 7 . Attached Schedule A summarizes the transaction . As District No . 13's flow increases, future capacity purchases wou l d be fi n anced from the reserve funds left over after the initial capacity acquisition is paid for out of the amount transferred by Di stricts 2 and 7, and connnection fee income collect ed from new construction as development occurs . As stated above , it was originally contemplated that an SDAF all ocation would be needed to finance the first year's operating and maintenance costs for District No. 13. This was because the formation schedul e at that time did not allow sufficient time between the anticipa ted formation date (July 1, 1984) and County Auditor/Assessor/Tax Collection cut-off date (August 10, 1984) for the Board of Directors to establish user fees and provide through the public hearing process for their collection on the tax bill in the first year of operation (1984-85). However, the revised formation schedule targeting November 7, 1984 would allow time before 1985-86 (now to be the first year of District No . 13's operation) for the new Board to accomplish this. Staff, therefore, recommends that the District No. 13 reserve funds also be utilized to finance O&M costs during the first year's dry period until the apportionment of user fees collected on the tax bill begins in November, 1985 . The reserve funds spent for O&M during that period would then be repaid out of user fee collections and, thereafter all O&M costs would be financed from annual user .fees. During the interim, until District No. 13 is formed, staff is recommending that the Boards immediately implement a schedule of user fees for properties that will be included in District No. 13 to pay for sewerage services that are now being provided by Districts 2 and 7 but for which the property owners are not -3- paying, either because they are outside an existing Sanitation District, or the property has been tax-zeroed . It is recommended that the user fees for properties presentl y outside the District be twice the fee for service inside District boundaries. The precedent for this policy has been established by the Boards in the existing regulations for use of Districts' sewerage facilities. This would also provide economic incentive for property owners to support formation of District 13 . The proposed use fees a re: Properties within an existing District that will be in new District No. 13 Properties outside an existing District that will be included in new District No. 13 $ 70 /year $140/year If adopted by the Boards, the staff will immediately commence billing the above fees for serv i ce to the property owners by Districts 2 and 7. After formation the estimated user fee for all properties within District No . 13 is $70 per year. It is also recommended that the following connection fee schedule, as recommendea in the Engineer's Report for District No. 13, be adopted: Zone A relates to those annexations in Districts 2 and 7 which have either been finalized or for which application was made by the property owner prior to the negotiated AB 8 settlement with the County. These annexations would be treated as if the annexation had been completed to Districts 2 or 7 in accordance with their existing policy. The recommended connection fee for Zone A is $220 per dwelling unit and $45/1000 sq. ft. for commercial/industrial construction. In addition , annexation acreage fees in effect at the time proceedings were commenced would be paid in accordance with the respective District's policy. Zone B is for undeveloped areas which have not requested annexation and for which gravity sewer service can be provided . The recommended connection fee for Zone B is $1250 per dwelling unit and $250/1000 sq . ft . for commercial/industrial construction. There would be no acreage fee. Zone C is similar to Zone B but the sewage from this area, mainly in the Carbon Canyon drainage, must be pumped to the Districts ' trun k sewer system. The recommended connection fee for Zone C is $1500 per dwelling unit and $300/1000 sq. ft. for commercial/industrial construction. There would be no acreage fee. Connection fees are collected for the Districts by the cities at the time building perm its are issued. Staf f will present additional information and review the recormnendations in detail along with the Eng i neer's Report and EIR at the meeting, using the enclosed discussion agenda outl ine . -4- SCHEDULE A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 7 AND 13 Allocation of Fees Collected to Date Within Originally Designated Boundaries of District 13 Fees collected to date from properties within originally proposed boundaries of Dist. 13 Interest earnings to 6/30/84 TOTAL AVAILABLE Amount to be retained in Dists. 2 & 7 for areas now to remain in 2 & 7: For capital facilities Set aside for tax-zeroed lots @$500 ea. to fund O&M from interest earnings Sub-total to be retained by Dist. 2 & 7 Balance to be transferred to Dist. 13 to be used for initial buy-in of Joint Works and sewers Initial Dist. 13 capacity purchase in: Joint Treatment Works Trunk Sewers Sub-total Dist. 13 initial facilities capacity purchase Reserve available for Dist. 13 annual CORF share and purchase of future capacity requirements $1,570,147 552,500 $353,817 678,357 TOTAL $4,245,206 2,060,679 $6,305,885 2,122,647 $4,183,238 1,032,174 $3,151,064 6/27/84 l 2 ) 4 5 ' 1 • 9 10 u u u l4 16 17 19 19 20 21 22 2J 24 2S 2' 27 2& ~ lO ll ll )J )4 35 )' 37 )8 39 40 u u 43 OESCRIPT'IOH OP!!RA Tn!G PUND ~ Sha.re ot l' Tax Al.location Fees Interest ' Miscellaneous Income Other Revenue TOTAL RRVBNUE TOTAL A~LAB!.8 PUNDING aXP£ND I TORES Share o t Joint Works H ' 0 Collection Syste.111 H ' O and Other Ope r. Othe r gxpenditures TOTAL IUPENDITURES ieaer'V'f!s ' Cu ry-Over to Ne xt Year Met Tear's Ory Period l'undin9 R~uire •enta 1'und B.U4t1ce or (D<oticit) CAP ITAL P'UND ( S) a.~rves ' Car r y--Ov•" PrOll L.ut Year ~ Constzuction Grants Pees: Connection Other Sale ot Capacity Ri9hts Interest ' Kiscell&neous Incoae Otl><! r I nooee TOTAL RBV!lllUB TOTAL A~LABIJ! l'IJNDING &XPENDITORES Share ot Joint works Treau.ent Plant Distri ct Collection Systea R.ei.al:ur s.e91en t A9r ee»en t Pa yaen ts Other !txp<tnditu res TOTAL IUPl!!IOITQRES Reserves ' Carry-Over t.o Next Year !lezt Tear's Dry Period l'undin9 Require...,nts P'Und Balance o r (D<oticit) llOND PUND ( S) lle~rves ' Car r y--Ove r PrOll L4st Year ~ Tu: Levy Interest ' Miscellaneous Ince~ Other Ioc:c.e IUP!L'IO I TURES Bond Principal ' Interest Other Expenditures TOTAL ~ITURES Reserves ' Carry-Over to Ne xt 'tear Next Y~r's Ory Period Pundinq Requiremen ts P'UDd Balance o r (0.. ti cl t) ~ (Ad justed for Inter-Pund Transfer s) Reserves ' Carry-Over Proa Last Year TOTAL REVmlt.m t'OTAL ,\VA.I I.ABU! l"tJllD ING TOTAL ltXPl!!lll ITURES bseCT"eS ' Carry-Over to Next Ye-ar !14.x~ Ye.e 's Dr y Period PW'\d i nq Requir ea.ents !'ll!iD BALAHC! CR ( Ol!l' I C IT) COUln'Y SANI TAT ION DISTRICT NO. 2 STA T!!MENT OP PROJECTED CASH P'LOW l'ISCAL YEARS 198 4-85 THROUGH 1 988-89 7,098,000 5,010,000 2 ,312,000 921,000 8 ,303,000 15,401,000 7,328,000 711!000 8,039 ,000 7 ! 362 ! 000 4,019,000 3,343,000 58,691,000 1 ,899,000 730,000 l, 2 4 9 '000 126 ! 000 5, 726,000 9' 730' 000 6 8,421,000 9,216,000 10,884,000 3,156,000 1 ,324,0 00 24 ! 580 ,000 43,8 41,0 00 0 43 ! 841, 000 270 ,000 121 , 000 1,324,000 1,445,000 1 ,715,000 383,000 3 83 ' 000 l, 332 ' 000 1, 332 ! 000 0 66,059 ,000 18' 15 4 ,0 00 84,213 ,0 00 31,678,000 52,535 ,000 5,351,000 n,184 ,ooo 7,362,000 5,Ul,000 2, 721,000 705,000 8,837,000 16' 199 '000 8 ,427,000 782,000 9,209,000 6,990 ,000 4 ,604,000 2,38 6 ,000 43, 841, 000 557 ,ooo 700,000 1, 436 '000 1, 262,000 l,549,000 7 ,504,000 51!345 ! 000 13,884,000 9 ! 474 ,000 23, 358,000 27 l 987 ,ooo 0 27 ,987 ,000 1,332,000 96 ,000 96 ! 000 1,428 ,000 370,000 370 ,000 l ,058,000 1,058,000 0 5 2' 5 35 ' 000 16,437,000 68 ' 972 ! 000 32' 937' 000 36,035,000 5,662,000 30 , 373,000 6 ,990 ,000 5,844,000 3,122,000 638 ! 000 9,604,000 16,594,000 9,691,000 860 ! 000 10,551,000 6,043,000 5 ,275 ,000 768,000 27,987,000 2,890,000 800,000 1,651,000 1,296,000 2, 328,000 8,965,000 36 ,952 ,000 17 ,151,000 175,000 17 ! 326,000 19,626,000 0 19 ,626,000 1,058,000 70 ,ooo 70,000 1,128,000 362,000 362,000 76 6,0 00 766,000 36,035,000 18 ,6)9,000 54,67 4,000 28 , 239 ,ooo 26 ' 435 ,00 0 6,041,000 20,)9 4,000 6,043,000 6,311,000 3,583,000 505,000 10,399 ,0 00 16,442,~00 11, 144,000 946,000 12,090,000 4,352,000 6,045 ,000 (l ,69 3 ,000) 19,626,000 2,890,000 900 ,0 00 l , 899 ! 0 00 280,000 l,400,000 7,369,000 26,995 ,000 16, 706,000 461,000 17,167,000 9,828,000 0 9,828,000 766, 000 36' 000 36 ! 000 802 ,00 0 403,000 403 ,000 399 ,ooo 399 ,0 00 26' 435 ,ooo 17 ! 904' 000 44' 239,000 29,660,000 14 ! 579 ! 000 6 ,444 ,000 8' 135 ' 0 00 4,352,000 6,8 16,000 4!114 ,000 304 ,ooo 11, 234 ,ooo 15,586,000 12 ' 816 ,000 1,041,000 13,857 ,ooo 1,729,000 6 r 928 r 000 (5,199 ,000) 9,828,000 2,890,000 1,000,000 2,183,000 247,000 693,000 7,013,000 16,841,000 10,044,000 710,000 10, 75 4,000 6, 087, 000 0 6,087,000 399 ! 000 399 ,000 39 9 ,ooo 399 ! 000 0 0 1 4,579,000 18, 247 ,000 32 ,826,000 25 ,010,000 7,81 6 ,00 0 6,928,000 888,000 6/19/84 5-Year Total 7,098,000 29,392,0 00 15,912,000 ),073,000 48,377 ,000 55,475,000 49,406,0 00 4' 340 ! 000 53, 746,000 1,729,0 00 6,928,000 (5!199 ! 000) 58,691,000 11, 126 ,000 4,4l0,000 8,418,ooo 1,211,000 13,696,000 40,581,000 99,272,000 67,001,000 21, 70 4 ,000 3 ,156 l, 324 ! 000 9 3 ,185,000 6,087 ,000 0 6,087,000 270,000 323,000 1,324,000 l ,647,000 1,917,000 l,917,000 l,917,000 0 0 66,059,000 8 9,281,0 00 155 ,340 ,000 147 ! 524 r 000 7' 816 ' 000 6,928 ,00 0 888,000 2 3 4 5 7 10 ll 12 l l 14 15 16 l7 18 l9 20 2l u ll 24 25 26 27 28 2' JO 31 32 33 34 35 36 n )8 JS 40 4l u u H 45 46 so -OESC!U ?!'ION OPEMTillG l'UND R.eserves ' Carry-Over Prom L4st Year Sha r e ot l\ Tu A.11cx:ation tees Interest ' Ki s oella.neous Incoce Other Revenue TOTAL RlNE!IUE TOTAL A I/Al L.\llLB FUND I NG u:nND [T'JRES Share ot Joint Works H ' 0 Collection Syn"• H ' 0 4nd Other Oper. Other l!xpenditu.res TOTAL UPEND [TURES R.eserves ' Carry-Over to Next Year Net Tc.u' s Dry Pe riod l'undinq Requirements P'und Bahnce or (Deficit) CAP nAL l"UNil ( S ) Reaerves ' Ca.cry-Over From Last Year C-a\..struction Cr.snts rees: COn.nection Other Sale ot Capacity Rights Interest ' M iscellan~s Income Other I nex>11.e 'l'O'tAL REVEllOE TOTA!. A I/Al I.AllLB FUND ING E..XP!:!IO [TURES S bare ot Joint Works TteAUlent Pl4nt Distric t Collection Syst"9 R.eiaburseaent Aqree~ent Pa)'1M!nts Otl>er !!.xpenditures TOTA!. UPEND I TURES R.ea.er~s ' CU ry-Over to Next Year N<U:t Tear's Dry Period l.'undinq ~equirea>ents l"und a....lance o r (De f1 cit ) BOID !'1.JNO(S) Reserves ' Carry-<>v.!r l'rcoa Last Year ~ Tax Levy Interest ' Kiscella.neous Incocae Othe r Income Bond ?r inc i pa.l ' Interes t Otl>er E.xpenditures TOTAL !l.l:PBNOITURES Reserv-es ' Ca.cry-Ove r to Next Year !'rlext Ye-ar's Ory Peri od Fund i ng RequireMents l'und Balance o r (Deficit) ~ (Adjus ted tor Inter-l'u nd Transfers) R.eservtts ' Carry-Over From Las t Year TOTAL R.."VE!WS TOTAL AVAILA!ILB l'UNO!liG TOTAL &XPE!llll TURES Reserves 'C.rry-Over t o Next Ye ar Ye-u 1 s Dey Pe riod !'undinq Requi re•ent3 PllND SALANO! OR (OEl'ICIT) COUNTY SAllITATION O!STRicr NO. 7 STATEMENT 0 1' PROJECTED CASH !'LOW PISCAL Y'£>JtS 1984-d S THROUGH 1988-89 1 ,12 5 ,000 1 ,860,000 514 , 000 209, 000 2,583 ,000 3,708,000 l, 50 3,000 512,00 0 2 ,015,0 00 1,693,000 l , 007, 00 0 6 8 6, 000 19' 167 ! 000 618 , 000 690,000 190, 000 38, 000 1 , 743,000 3, 279,000 22,446,0 00 3 ,000 ,000 4 ,366,0 00 2 ' 628 '000 9,994,00 12,4 52,000 12 ,452,0 0 0 48 9 ,ooo 265,000 2,628,000 2,8 9 3,000 3,382,0 00 681,000 681,000 2, 701,000 2, 701,000 0 20,78 1,000 6,1 27 ,000 26 '9 08 '000 10 ,062,0 00 16,846,000 3,70 8 ,0 00 l)' 138 '000 1 ,693,000 2,009,000 589, 000 195,000 2,79 3 ,00 0 4,486 ,000 l, 729,000 563,000 2,292,00 0 2, 194,000 l ! 146' 000 l , 0 48 '000 12' 452' 000 181, 000 650 ! 00 0 218' 000 411, 000 1,0 05 ,000 2,465,00 0 14,917,000 4 '520, 000 2, 751,000 7 ' 271 ,000 7,646,000 7 ,646,000 2,701,0 00 227,000 227 '000 2 , 928 '000 639 ,000 639' 00 0 2' 289' 000 2,289,000 0 16 '846' 00 0 5, 485 ,000 22,331,000 10 ' 202' 0 00 12 ' 1 29 '000 3 , 435 ,0 00 8 ,694,000 2, 19 4 ,000 2,110,0 00 676' 0 00 245 ,000 3' 09 1 , 0 00 5' 285' 0 00 1,988,000 619,000 2,60 7,000 2,678,000 1,303,000 1, 375,000 7,646,000 941,000 600 ,000 250,0 00 74,000 575,0 00 2,H0,000 10,086,000 5 ,584 ,000 578,000 6,1 62 ,000 3 ,924,0 00 3, 9 24 '0 00 2' 289 ' 0 00 186,0 00 186 ! 000 2 ' 475' 000 639' 0 00 639 ,000 1 ,8 36 ,000 1,836,0 0 0 0 12' 129' 0 0 0 S ,717,0 00 17 ,8 46,0 00 9 ,4 0 8,000 8,438 ,000 3, 139 ,0 0 0 5, 299 ,000 2 , 6 78 '000 2,344,0 00 777 '000 29 0, 0 0 0 3,411,000 6 ,089,000 2' 286' 000 681, 000 2 ,967,000 3,122,000 l ,483 ,000 1 , 6 39 '00 0 941 ,000 600 ,000 288 ,ooo 87,000 220,000 2,136,000 6 ,060,000 5,439,000 100,000 S,539,000 521 ,000 521,0 0 0 l,836,000 147 ,000 147' 000 1 ,983,000 593 ,000 593' 000 1,390,000 1,390,000 0 8, 438 ,ooo 5,694,000 14, 132' 000 9' 099 , 000 S,0 33,0 0 0 2,873 ,0 00 2,160,000 J,122 ,000 2 ,532,000 892, 000 330, 000 3,754,000 6,876,000 2,629,000 749 ,000 3 ! 378 ! 000 3,498,000 1,689,000 1,8 09,000 521,000 941,000 600 , 000 330 ,000 l,313,000 45,000 3,229 ,000 3, 750,000 3,270,000 100,0 00 3 ,370,000 380 ,ooo 380 ,00 0 1, 3 90,000 103,000 103,000 1, 493, 0 00 577,000 577 ,ooo 916 ,000 916 ! 000 0 S,0 33 ,0 0 0 7,086 ,000 12, 119, 000 7,3 25,00 0 4,794 ,000 2,6 05,000 2 ,189 ,0 00 6/19/84 5-Ye ar T o tal l , 125 ,00 0 10,915 ,000 3,448,000 1,269,000 lS,632,000 16, 757,000 10,135,000 3,124,000 13, 259' 000 3,498,000 l , 689 '000 l , 809' 000 19!167 ,ooo 3, "1:2 , 000 3,U0,000 1 , 276,000 l,923,000 3 ,588 ,000 13 ,549,000 32 , 716,0 00 21,813,000 7,895 ,000 2,628 ,000 32, 336, 000 380,000 380 ,000 489,000 928,000 2 ,628,000 3 ,556 ,000 4 ,045 ,000 3,129,000 J,129,000 916,00 0 916 ,000 20, 781,0 00 30 ,109 ,000 S0,890,000 46,096 ,000 4,794,000 2,605,00 0 2 , 1 8 9 ,000 .!£!! OESCJU ?TlOtl OPERATING !'UNO Reserves • Carry--Over Prom t.ast Year !!!.YE!!!! ~ec Oser fees !'eea Interest ' Miscellaneous Income Other Revenue TOTAL REVEmra TOTAL A llAlLAB!.E PUNOI!IG aPENOITUll.ES 8 Sbace of Joint work• K • O 9 Collection Systea K ' o and Othe r Oper. 10 Other !!:i<penditur es u TOTAL fXPEHDITORES tl Re serves ' Carry-Over to Next Ye a r lJ Ne t Ye a r's Ory Period !'Und lnq Requirement s H !'Und 84hnce or (t>eficlt) CAPITAL FUND !S) 15 Rese rves • Car ry--Over ?rom Last 't e ar RBVf:NUB 16 Construction Ct.;ll'lts l7 !"~s : Conne-ct ion 18 Ot.ller 19 sale oC Capacity Rlqhts 20 Interes t ' Miscell.i.neous Inc:ocne u Othe r Inccce 22 TOTAL REY!llU"B 2.' TOTAL A I/All.ABLE FUNDING !XPENO ITUll.ES 24 Shar e of Joint Works Treauent Plant 25 District Collection Syst "'" (Capacity Riqhts) 26 llelab.usement Aqreeaent Payments l7 Othec Expenditure s (Repay !'Otlllation) 28 TOTAL EXPENOITIJRES 29 Reserves ' Carry-Over to Ne xt. Year COUNl"f SANITATION DISTRICT NO . l3 57 A TEME!IT 01' PROJ!!CTBD CASI! !'LOW l'ISCAL YEAllS l98S-86 T!!ROLIGll 1989-90 1985-86 1986-87 (1750) (2325) 26. 000 100,000 (70) 122. 000 (70) 163,000 (70) 45,000 6,000 9,000 -o- 173,000 172,000 199 ' 000 212,000 76. 000 113,000 23. 000 25, 000 -o - 99. 000 138,000 100, 000 134,000 so. 000 69 ,000 so. 000 65,000 2,101,000 2,2H,ooo 3, 000 30, 000 Sll, 000 642,000 7C. 000 7 4 ,000 6, 000 2,000 22S,OOO 206,000 -o- 8191 000 954 ,000 J,s20,ooo 1, 228 1 ooo 418,000 685,000 678,000 241, 000 -o - 150,000 1,246,000 926 '000 2, 27C ,000 2,102,000 1987-88 ~ 134 . 000 285,000 15, 000 100,000 4 3C '000 223, 000 33,000 256 '000 178,000 128' 000 50, 000 2,302,000 40 ,000 889,000 H ,000 4,000 193,000 i,200,000 1 ,so2,ooo 625,000 863,000 t,4 88,000 2' 014' 000 1988-89 1989-90 (5075) (6250) 178,000 256 ,000 (80) 406, 000 (80) 500,000 21, 000 27,000 c21,ooo 527' 000 605 1 000 783,000 312,000 43 4. 000 37,000 4 2,000 349 ,000 476 1 000 256,000 307 ,000 175 1 000 238,000 81,ooo 69,000 2' 014' 000 2, 198,000 56 . 000 12 , 000 979 ,000 2 ,301,000 7C' 000 74,000 8 ,ooo 7,000 188,000 265, 000 i,105,000 2,659,000 J ,ll9,000 4 1 857 1 000 852,000 900,000 269,000 330,000 l, 121, 000 1,230,000 2,198,000 3,627,000 Preliminary 6/22/84 5-Year Total 26' 000 l ,476,000 45,000 78,000 -o- l,599,000 i,625,000 1,158,000 160,000 -o- 1 1 318 1 000 307 ,000 238 ,000 69,000 2,101,000 l Cl,000 s, Joal, 000 370,000 27,00 0 l, 077 ,000 -o - 6. 937 ,000 9 1638 1 000 3 , 480, 000 2 , 381, 000 -o- 150, 000 6,011,000 3,627,000 .,.. \. · INTERIM ANNUAL USER FEES ···.:-------------' !: ~AHITATIOH DISTRI CT HO. 13 \ :\. $70.00/yr. D $140 .00/yr . • ! ' ,. . "t '• ~ .· ... . .. June 21, 1984 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ot Q RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.0.80X8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 STAFF SUMMARY REPORT ON COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 ENGINEER'S FORMATION REPORT AND FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ENGINEER'S FORMATION REPORT (714) 962-241, . The Engineer's Report, prepared by Lowry and Associates, sets forth the boundaries and capacities required in sewerage facilities for the proposed Sanitation District No. 13 service area encompassing approximately 24,000 acres to the northeast of existing Districts 2 and 7. These areas are either not presently annexed to any Sanitation District but within the originally proposed Master Plan service boundaries for Districts 2 and 7, or are properties already annexed to Districts 2 and 7 subsequent to June 7, 1978 that are proposed to be reorganized into District No. 13. The Report also recommends a schedule of connection fees that will be used to pay for future capacity needs in the Joint Districts' treatment works and the trunk sewers of Districts 2 and 7, and provides other necessary information for use by the Board in the formation of the District. The area to be included was determined by defining all undeveloped land between the existing boundaries of Districts No. 2 and 7 and the boundary of the County of Orange. Also included were certain areas in various stages of development that were in the process of annexing to either District No. 2 or No. 7 at the time the agreement was made with the County of Orange to form District No. 13 for which no share of the County ad valorem taxes would be received by the District. District No. 13 will include over 23,500 total acres, of which 14,300 are designated as recreation and open space. The new District is projected to generate an ultimate average flow of 11.04 MGD based on the anticipated land use. The District will drain to several collection systems which will require the utilization of capacity in existing and proposed trunk sewers of other Districts in addition to Joint Works facilities fo~ treatment and disposal. The estimated purchase cost for capacity in existi~g c~l:ection facilities was determined by using the Boards' standard policy of escalating the project cost at the time of :-..,,,.,; construction to current value based on the ENR (20 cities) index. For illustrative purposes the proportionate capacity in the Joint Works facilities is calculated based on District No. 13's projected flow requirements of 11.04 MGD over the rated capacity of the joint facilities of 208 MGD at the time the Report was drafted. However, the actual amount will be determined at time of purchase based on the Joint Works Districts' equity formula and will probably be somewhat less than the amount shown in the Report. The Report projects that the District No. 13 share of the Joint Works facilities, both existing and future, will be $17,494,591 and that their share of existing and future collection facilities will be $12,071,876 for a total cost in both collection and treatment facilites of $29,666,467, all in 1984 dollars. The Engineer's report recommends that three zones be created for the purpose of establishing connection fees which concept was previously approved by the Boards of Districts 2 and 7. Zone A includes tax-zeroed parcels where negotiations for annexation to either District No. 2 or 7 are in process, or parcels which have completed annexation to either District but will be deannexed and incorporated into District 13. Since monies have already been deposited with the Districts the fees are based on the annexation fee at the time annexation was requested and range from $1138 per acre to $1616 per acre depending on when annexation procedures were .initiated. Additionally, connection fees of $220 per dwelling unit or $45 per 1000 square feet for industrial/commercial buildings are recommended based on the level of development anticipated when annexation was requested. Any development greater than the acreages or lots set forth in the original annexation requests included within Zone A should be charged at the current zone B rate. zone B incorporates areas included within the Districts' Master Plan where no annexation procedures have been initiated It is recommended that the zone B area should be assessed connection fees of $1250 per dwelling unit for residential or $250 per 1000 square feet for industrial/commercial buildings. zone C includes the region tributary to the Carbon Canyon Pump Station. Connection fees for this area are higher because the cost of providing service must include either a pump station/ force main system or a gravity tunnel system. The connection fee for Zone C is recommended to be $1500 per dwelling unit or $300 per 1000 square feet for industrial/commercial buildings. The funds collected to date from the zone A area of District No. 13 in acreage fees and connection fees, along with additional projected connection fees and acreage fees collected prior to completion of the formation proceeding will be transferred to District 13 to provide funds to purchase the necessary initia~ -2- -a capacity in the Joint Works and collection facilities. The connection fees can be adjusted at any time by the Directors. The Engineer's Report recommends that the initial District No. 13 purchase be ·a.9 million gallons a day of capacity in existing facilities. The remaining necessary capacity will be purchased in the future as development occurs. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The EIR for the formation of District No. 13 was prepared by Ultrasystems, Inc. A Notice of Preparation was sent to affected agencies and interested parties as required by CEQA. Comments were received from: 1. Local Agency Formation Conunission 2. Orange County Water District 3. California Regional Water Quality Control Board 4. Pacific Telephone 5. County of Orange Environmental Management Agency 6. Office of the Treasurer 7. Office of Planning and Research 8. Southern California Gas Company 9. City of Villa Park 10. City of Huntington Beach 11. City of Irvine 12. Southern California Edison Company 13. u. s. Fish & Wildlife Service 14. SCAG 15. Caltrans 16. City of Orange 17. Serrano Irrigation District 18. Department of Parks & Recreation 19. South Coast Air Quality Management District The majority of these responses were "no comment". The Local Agency Formation Commission outlined procedural steps for the formation of the new District and stated they wish to consider the formation of the District and it's sphere of influence concurrently. These two issues are tentatively scheduled for LAFCO hearing in November. The Orange County Water District inquired as to quality of the domestic water supply in order to determine potential impacts on sewage quality that may occur at Plant No. 1 that would affect their water reclamation program. They also stated that surf ace and groundwaters in the Carbon Canyon area are entering the underground basin and suggested that the waters at La Vida Mineral Springs be sewered to improve the groundwater. The project will not affect the water quality at Plant No. 1. The Districts do not anticipate the project rerouting the poor -3- quality water from the Carbon Canyon area to the sewer system because the Industrial Waste Ordinance does not permit discharge of groundwater to the sewerage facilities. \e./~ The California Regional Water Quality Control Board expressed concern over the types and amounts of wastes, the proposed treatment and disposal methods and impacts to existing facilities, and the potential impacts on water quality. The District 13 area is tributary to and was originally intended to be served by Districts 2 and 7, and thus has always been included within the Sanitation Districts' sphere of influence. Impacts on treatment and disposal will be addressed in the EIR for the Joint Works Master Plan currently in preparation. The Department of Parks and Recreation made note of their Chino Hills project and asked that any impacts to that project be addressed. Basically, the formation of District No. 13 is to resolve the means of financing sewerage services to the area that is otherwise tributary to Districts 2 and 7, thus, no additional sewerage facilities will be built that would not have otherwise been constructed by Districts, therefore, there are no environmental impacts that will be caused by virtue of the formation of District No. 13. The EIR outlines the financial program to be implemented within the District including collection of a one-time connection fee from each property owner on a per-unit basis to pay for sewerage facilities, as well as the collection of a yearly service fee from each user to pay for annual operating and maintenance costs. The Report explains that capacity in the collection and treatment · facilities necessary to serve District No. 13 is included in the Master Plan of Sewers for Districts 2 and 7 and would be provided regardless of the formation of a new District, stating that "if no new District were formed, an identical infra-structure would be provided by Districts No. 2 and 7 in accordance with the Master Plans of Sewers". The environmental evaluation portion of the report states that new development will occur in this area regardless of formation of the new District. In the event the new District is not formed, annexation to Districts No. 2 and 7 would require that special service agreements be signed or fee zones be formed to insure that areas not providing property tax revenue would pay their fair share of collection and treatment costs. The report states "approval of the project will provide a convenient and efficient method of providing the Districts a means to recover collection and treatment costs". -4- The report details the environmental impacts that might occur from proposed developments in the ultimate land use plans approved by local cities and counties, but states that these potential environmental impacts are associated with projects proposed for the area, not with the formation of the District and the formation will not affect the magnitude of the impacts described. No mitigation measures are recommended since the proposed action will not create or change land use impacts in the affected area approved by local cities and county and will only accomodate planned growth. The environmental impact report does outline several alternatives to the proposed action. These include: A. No project, or postponement, which would prevent the formation of a new sanitation district. The existing developments would remain in District No. 2 or No. 7 and new development would annex thereto and pay connection and service fees to those Districts. The physical impacts of this alternative would be no different than the proposed project. B. Formation of a sanitation district independent of the Orange County Sanitation Districts. This alternative would result in an independent sanitation district that would be unable to share in the Districts' collection and treatment facilities, thereby necessitating the construction of trunk sewer lines and treatment facilities in the project area. It is anticipated that impacts from this alternative would be of greater magnitude and severity than those associated with the formation of District No. 13. c. Treatment of sewage by utilization of septic tank systems. This would require soil testing for percolation capabilities and the Report pointed out that large scale use of septic tanks can have detrimental effects on groundwater quality. Further, they may not be allowed by the County Health Department. o. To annex the entire area now outside the Sanitation Districts to District No. 2 or District No. 7. Areas presently within Districts 2 and 7 that are proposed for detachment and inclusion in District No. 13 would remain in their present District. Fee zones or service agreements would have to be established for the newly annexed areas and the areas proposed for detachment to recover capital and operating costs. The physical impacts would be no different than the proposed project. If any Director has a question on either report, please feel free to call Tern Dawes or Hilary Baker, 540-2910. -5- .. .. .. - ATTAQU1ENT A AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 AND ELECTROLURGY, INC. PERTAINING TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT NO. 7-162 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between: AND and is effective this COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, referred to as "District"; NO. 7 OF hereinafter ELECTROLURGY, INC., a California corporation~ 1121 Duryea, Irvine, California 92714, hereinafter referred to as "Permittee", q day of January, 1984. WHEREAS, Permittee, a metal processing facility located at 1121 Duryea, Irvine, California 92714, has discharged pollutants into District's sewage system since 1976, pursuant to a Class I Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 7-162, issued to Permittee by County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, subject to the requirements and conditions established by the District; and WHEREAS , Permit tee adrni ts and acknowledges th·a t suf f ic ien t evidentiary facts exist and are included as part of the District's record to support a finding that Permittee has violated the provisions of District Ordinance No . 718, in that Permittee has discharged a quantity of cadmium and chromium in excess of the limitations set forth in said permit at numerous times commencing in 1978, and continuing to December, 19 8 3; and WHEREAS, Permittee admits and acknowledges that said violations of Permit No. 7-162 constitute a public nuisance and constitute valid grounds for District to order a revocation of Permittee's Class I Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit; and WHEREAS, on September 1, 1983, in accordance with District Ordinance No. 718, District issued to Permittee Invoice No. 812249, in the amount of Twelve Thousand ($12,000.00) Dollars, equalling the total sum of non-compliance fees imposed by District as a result of Permittee's violations of Permit No . 7 - 162; and WHEREAS, pursuant t o District Ordinance No. 718, Permittee has the responsibility to install pretreatmen t facilities to avoid discharges that violate the discharge limitations set forth in Industrial wastewater Discharge Permit No. 7-162; and WHEREAS, Permittee and District desire to reach a conclusive understanding as to the rights and obligations of each party . NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: section 1: Perrnittee agrees to pay to District, concurrent with the execution of this Ag reement, the total sum of Four Thousand ($4,000 .00 ) DOllars, which Permittee owes to District , pursuant to the requirements and conditions of Class I Industrial wastewater Discharge Fermi t No . 7-162 ( 11 Penni t No. 7 -162 11 ) , payment of said sum shall be deemed full paymen t for all non- compliance fees owed by Permittee to District through December 31, 1983. section 2 : During the term of this Agreement, or as specified in section 17 of this Agreement , Permittee shall be authorized to discharge into District 's sewer system ir. accordance with the following interim discharge limits: lbs./day Arsenic ? Cadmi urn Chromium Copper Cyanide (total) Cyanide (free) Lead Mercury Nickel Silver Zinc 0 .35 1. 0 1. 35 1. 06 0 .50 0.2 1. 30 0.35 1 .30 Section 3: Permittee shall achieve compliance with limits contained in said Permit No . 7 -162 , in accordance with the following schedule of compliance for specific actions: A . Initial study to identify completed effluent characteristics B. Detailed design completed C. Completion of engineering completed D. Complete review of installation 02 /0 1/84 plan with orange County Sanitation Districts E. Obtain necessary City and County 02 /15/84 permits F . Place construction purchase orders 03 /01 /84 and prepare site for receipt of equipment G. Commence construction and installation 02 /01/84 H. Complete construction and installation 03/01/84 of pretreatment facilities I. Start-up of system operations and personnel training J . Permittee is in compliance with permit 05 /3 1 /84 conditions and limits section 4: Permittee shal l subm i t to District a monthly report of prog ress and in the case of specific actions listed in Section 3 of this Agreement, a written notice of compliance or non-compliance no later than fifteen (15) days after each date for completio n of spec ific actions. Written not ices of non- :. compliance shall include the cause of. non-compliance, remedial actions taken , and the probability of meeting the next scheduled requirement. section 5: The parties agree that compliance shall be based upon the standard method of sampling and testing utilized by District, the State Water Resources Control Board, Regional water Quality Control Boa~d, or United States Environmental Protection Agency requirements . section 6: Permittee shall pay compliance fees for discharges, subsequent to the date of this Agreement which are in excess of limitations set forth in Section 2 of this Agreement, in accordance with the fee schedule established in section 60l(A) (Table II) of District's Ordinance No. 718, as follows : Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Silver Zinc Cyanide Cyanide section 7: (Total) (Total) (Free) DOllars Per Pound Per Day In Excess of Limit After ECSA Compliance $300 .00 $300 .00 $300.00 $300 .00 $240 .00 $300.00 $150.00 $300.00 $150.00 $150.00 $300.00 Permittee agrees to be responsible for the payment of all reasonable costs incurred by District for the sampling and testing procedures required during the term of this Agreement. section 8: Effective December 31, 1983, and until adequate on -site water pollution control treatment facilities are installed and maintained to satisfy permit limitations, Permittee shall be responsible to haul away a n d dispose of all effluent or wa s te products necessary to comply with the limitations set forth in section 2 of this Agreement . Section 9 : The foregoing notwithstanding, nothing in this Agreement wil l affect Permittee's obligation to pay current and future charges for use of the District's sewage system or Permittee 1 s obligation to comply with all other conditions and requirements of Class I Industri a l Wastewater Discharge Permit No . 7 -162 . Nothing in this Agreement affects District 's right to enforce all requ irements and conditions of s a i d Permit. section 10 : District shall re-issue Permit No . 7 -162 on September 1 , 1984 , the date when said Permit is now due to ex - pire ,provided that Permittee has complied with all terms and _con ditions of this Agreement and District Ordinance No . 718 . section 11 : In the event of default by Permittee for failure to comply with the schedule of compliance set forth in section 3 above, District may physically disconnect Permittee's facility from District's sewage system , upon seventy -two (72t hours ' written notice, and Permittee agrees to waive any right to be heard by District's Board of Directors regarding revocation of the Class I Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No . 7 -162. In addition, District shall promptly initiate legal proceedings to collect all monies owed to District by Permittee. section 12: Permittee agrees to pay to District on inv o ice for all r e asonable costs incurred by District directly related to the ad ministration o f t his Agreement. Section 13: In the event Permittee fails to comply with the schedule of compliance set forth in Section 3 above, District shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs that may be incurred in order to enforce this Agreement , with or without filing proceedings in Court. Section 14: This Agreement is made only for the benefit of the parties hereto; it is not intended that any rights under this Agreement shall accrue to any third person. section 15: This Agreement and all r ights and duties shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of all parties hereto, and to all their· successors-in-interest. Neither party may delegate a duty or assignn or transfer a right arising out of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. section 16: All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, -snall be sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be deemed received seventy-two (72) hours after deposit in the mail in Orange County, California, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: TO DISTRICT: With Copy TO: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708 Attn.: Fred A. Harper, General Manager Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq. General Counsel Rourke & woodruff 1055 North Main Street, #1020 Santa Ana, Ca. 92701 TO PERMITTEE: Electrolurgy, Inc. 11221 Duryea Irvine, Ca. 92714 / section 17: This Agreement shall be effective this_!]_ day of January, 1984, and shall continue in full force and effect until Permittee shall achieve compliance with the limitations contained in Permit No. 7-162 and the terms and conditions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. COUNTY ORANGE SANITATION DISTRICT COUNTY, CALIFORNI NO. 7 OF ~:.,.\ ~By-19.~~:.L..~:..,_~~=-~~~~~.£::..__:~b,..~~~ \ A~OVED AS ;oJORM: /'Yitma.d J(J~~ Thomas L. Woodruf1/€I1eral Counsel ::~RG~IN~/ Eric w. Eklund, Presidene· 4.pj 7 ~. 6 /11/84 ATTACHMENT B M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: BLAKE Al.'IDERSON, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FROM: RAY E. LEWIS SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT -AGREEMENT BETWEEN CSDOC NO. 7 AND ELECTROLURGY, INC. TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT NO. 7-162 INTRODUCTION In March of this year, this office filed a report with Mr. Eric Ekland. of Electrolurgy, outlining the pretreatment facilities required to meet the permit· limitations set forth in said Permit No . 7 -162. A copy of this re- port was forwarded to your office. Included in this report was a com- pliance schedule for the completion of the pretreat:nent facilities. Full comp+iance with the facility in complete operation was contempl ated to be May 31, 1 9 84 . STATUS OF PRETREATMENT FACILITIES The following is a summary of all equipment specified and the status of each: ITEM 1 . Waste Holding Pit 2 . Flash Mix Tank 3 . Flocculation Tank 4 . Sludge Holding Pit 5. Treated Effluent Pit 6. Hy eropfloc Tank 7. Wastewater Supply Pumps 8. Hydropfloc Pump 9 . Sluge Pump 10. Flash Mixer 11. Hydropfloc Mixer 1 2 . ~locculati on Mix er 13. pH Indicator -Co nt=o ller 14. Level Sw i tches 15. Plate & Frame Filter Press Installed & Comp l ete Fabricated On -Site. Fabricated On -Site Installed & Comp l ete Installed & Co mp l ete Installed P .O . Issued; Deliv ery by 6 /25 Shelf Item; One (1 ) Week Deliv ery P. O. Issued; De l i v ery by 6 /2 5 Shelf Item; One (1 ) Week De l i v ery Shelf Item; One · (1 ) Week De live r y Shelf Item; One (1 ) Wee k Deliv ery P. 0 . Issued; De l i v ery b y 6 /2 5 Shelf Item; One (1 ) Week Del ivery Fabricated t o be delivere d b y 6 /18 -1- Based on the above status of the equipmenc items and the installation there- of, the facility should be complete and operational by July 31, 1984. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to ~ive me a call. rtk cc: Eric Eklund -2 - I! ATTACHMENT C COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TEL.E:PHCNES: AREA COO£ 714 540-2910 962-2411 . i I ' P. 0. sex 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OF"F"·RAMF', SAN DIEGO F'REEWAY) June 15, 1984 REF# 692 Electolurgy, Inc. ll21 Duryea Lrvi.ne, CA 92714 Attention: Mr. Eric ~und Ce...i-ti.fied. Mail-P710596072 Retur:l Receipt Request;=r Subject: Request for Extension to Ccmplete Pre-Treatme..'1t S y stem 'The Districts are in receipt of Electrolurgy, Inc. ' s ( "Electrolurgy") request t.."12.t the Districts e:<te..11d the date by which Electrolurgy is to achieve can- ?liance wi.t..'1-i LL.Ltits contained in I..nCust:ri.al Waste Permit No. 7-162, as provided in t..1-ie Agresr.ent beb'lie:en Ccunty Sanitation District No. 7 and Ele:7-=olurgy, Inc., t=ertaining to II'..du.strial Waste Permit No. 7-162, ("F<..gr&.:me..11t") . As you know, t.~e Pgresne..11t provides, in Section 3, that Electrolurgy was to achieve can-:- pliance wit.'1 the limits contair1ed. in Industrial Waste Discharge Pemtit No. 7 -152 by ~Y 31, 1984. Electrolurgy has failed to do so. 'The Districts ' sta -r= will consider Electrolurgy 1 s request, orovided t.1-E t Electrolurgy canpl ies wit.~ t.he follcwi._ri.g conditions: L ELcctrolurgy shall E=QSt cash, or a bond, in a form approved by, a!".d an amount detemri..."'le:. by t..1-ie Districts C..eneral Counsel. The am:Junt o f cash o r l:::cnd shall insu re oe...rforrri.a...r1ce ar:d cover t.':e cost o f e..rt:orci.:.<; c:::m- pliance wit.11 t::e ter:mS and conditions o f ~":e Agreement, or any approve:. exte...,.,.sions thereof. Tiris canpl.iar..ce L>:.cludes ccmpletion o f .Slectro- lurgy' s pre-t=e.atm.e..11t facilities. 2. Electrolurgy shal l sui:::mit t..~e ori<;L'1als (er o r igir.al ca.rl:on c opies ) o f purc.'iase o rce.?:"s f o r itans ~;cs. 7, 9 , 13, and 15, as stated L"l Elect=olurs-~·s =eqt:est for extension, C:.::.=C J une 11, 198 4. (See _Cl_t,-....ac..~t ~.) . Jttne 15, 1984 REF#" 692 page 2 3. Electrolurgy s..'1.all sul:rnit written verification fran v endors that Itans Nos. 8, 10, ll, 12, and 14, as stated in Electrolurgy's request for extension, can be delivered as specified. 4. Electrolurgy shall sul:m.it a process material balance audit fran the time perioo covered by the Pqreenent, beginning JanuaJ:y 9, 1984 through May 31, 1984. The process material balance audit shall include copies of all wastewater manifests and water meter: readings. 5. Electrolurgy shall m::dify the effluent pit in a satisfactory rranner to prevent ove_rflows, spills, and floor drainage of contaminated materials fran entering the effluent stream untreated. This is required to rneet spill containment provisions set forth in Section 5 of the Regulations For Use of Districts Se\A/erage Facilities (Ordinance) . The Districts shall expect to receive b"'le aJ:ove me.11tioned perfo:rmance l:or.d and other required documentation by June 22, 1984, at the Districts' office located at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California 92728. I wish to reiterate, in the . event Electrolurgy fails to canpl y with t..'1-ie aJ:ove conc1i tions, the Districts' fully intend to exercise its rights under the ~eenent and Ordinance. Should you have any questions with regard to the aJ:ove, please do not hesitate to contact me at extension 250. RVL/gl Enclosure cc : Thanas L. Wccdruf f, C-.e..'1eral Counsel Con E. Smith, Oia..i.Dnan, District 7 Richard W. von I.angen, P. E. Chief of Industrial Waste Bill Vardoulis, Director/Councilman, City. of Irvine Brad Bateman, I.W. L11Sp€Ctor IDwry & ~~sociates ATTACHMENT D AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 AND ELECTROLURGY, INC., PERTAINING TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT NO. 7-162 THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT, is made and entered into by and between: AND and is· effe.ctive this COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,. hereinafter referred to as "District"; ELECTROLURGY, INC •. , a California corporation, 1121 Duryea, Irvine, California, 92714, hereinafter referred to as npermittee", ~ Tv[~ ~day of -a:e1t'e, 1984. WHEREAS, District and Permittee have previously hereto en-· tered into an Agreement dated January 9, l.984, (nOriginal Agreement"), pertaining to Industrial Wastewater Permit No. 7-· 162~ pursuant to which Permittee· agreed to construct and install pcetreatment facilities to avoid discharges that violate the discharge limitations set f Qrth in Iridustrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 7-162 ("Permit"); and WHEREAS, Section.3 of the Original Agreement provided that Permittee would achieve compliance with limits contained ·in said Permit, in accordance with a schedule of compiiance f6r specific . . actions, which.established-that Permittee ~ould achieve said compliance May 31, 1984; and WHEREAS, Permittee admits and acknowledges that it has failed to complete construction and installation of the af oremen- tioned pre~reatment facilities in accordance with the Schedule of Compliance.set forth in Section 3 of the Original Agreement; and 1 . .. " . . WHEREAS, Permittee has request~d that District extend the date by which Permittee shall complete construction and installation of said pretreatment facilities; and WHEREAS, District has incurred.considerable expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees to enforce ~be provisions of the Original Agreement; and WHEREAS, District a·esires to insure that Permittee com- pletes construction and installation of said pretreatment facil.i-· ties achieves· compliance with limitations set forth in Permit, and secures the payment of costs incurred to enforce· the provisions of the Original Agreement, including reasonable attorneys' fees, it appears desirable· that the parties agree to cer.tain additional provisions. Now·, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as_follows: Section i: All of the terms· and provisions contained. in the Original. Ag~eement., except as are herein modified, will continue in full force and effect •. ·section 2: The provi$ions in the Original Agreement .of January 9, 1984, respecting the date of completion· by which Permittee shall construct and install pretreatment fa6ilities, are hereby modified as follows: A. District agrees to extend the time by which Permi ttee shall complete construction .and insta-llation of. said pretreatment facilities provided that Permittee c~mplies with the conditions set forth in Paragraphs B and C below: B.· Permittee agrees to complete construction and in- sta~lation. of pretreatment facilities to avoiddischarges that violate the discharge limitations set forth in Permit no later 2 ... .. . than August 7, 1984. C. Permittee agrees to furnish a surety bond in the amount of Twen:ty Thousand. ($20,000.00) Dollars as security guaranteeing the completion of construction and installation of said pretreatment facilities, no later than August 7, 1984. D. Permittee further agrees to pay to .District the sum of Seven Thousand Five Hundred ($7 ,500.00) Dollars, a portion of which Permittee owes to District for costs incurred by District, since January .9, 1984, to enforce the provisions of the Original Agreement, including reasonable attorneys' fees, as provided i~ Section 13 of the Original. Agreement, and a portion of which may be applied to ·c~ver costs which may be incurred to enforce the provisions of the Original Agreement and this Amendment to Agreement through August 7, 1984. Payment shall be· in accordance with the terms of Section 3 b~low. Section 1: Permittee agrees to pay the sum 6f Seven Thousand Five Hundred ($7,500.00) Dollars as· follows: . A. Concurrent with the execution of this Amendment to Agreement, Permittee shall pay to District the sum of Seve~ Thousand Five Hundred ($7,500.00) Dollars by delivering a certified check in said amount to District's offices located at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Ca. 92728. B. District agree~ to deduct from the monies paid to ·District all costs incurred by District, since January 9, 1984, to enforce the provisions of the Original Agreement, including reasonable attorneys' fees, and all such costs which may be incurred by District to enforce the provisions of the Original 3 c... I, . Agreement and this Amendment to Agreement through August 7, 1984. C. District agrees that in the event all of the monies paid by Permittee to District have not been deducted to reimburse District for its costs of enforcing the provisions of the Original Agreement and this Amendment. to.Agreement, by August 7, 1984, the District shall refund to Permittee the balance paid~ within ten (10) days. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Agreement on the day and year first above written. FORM::· ( 15.) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BY---------------------------------------Chairman, Board of Directors BY.------------------------------------~ Secretary, Board of Directors Counsel 4 11 1 l i I I ~ i I , , ATTACHMENT E COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P . Cl . sax 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORN I A 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUC L I D OFF-RAMP. SAN D I EGO FREEWAY) June 22, 1984 REFffe 704 Electrolurgy, Inc . 1121 Duryea Irvine, CA 92714 Attent ion : Eric Eklun d Certified Mail -P730099342 Return Receipt Requested Subject: Request for Adequate and Additional Information TEl..E?HON ES: AFIEA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 The Districts are in receipt of Electrolurgy's information dated June 20, 1984. This information was requested in our letter of June 15, 1984 (REF# 692). The review of the information i n dicates that data has not been submitted for the following items: ITEM (13) pH Indicator-Controller (15) Plate and Frame Filter Press (8) Hydrofloc Pump (12) Flocculation Mixer a Original or original carbon copy. REQUIREMENTS Purchase Ordera Purchase Order Purchase Order Purchase Order This information must be received by 3:00 p.m., June 25, 1984, at the Districts offices located at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California to consider your request for extension. In addition, the Districts are requesting submission of electrical and instru- mentation construction drawings by July 11, 1984 and a set of as -built drawings depicting the installed equipment, piping, wiring, and process flow of the pretreatment system by August 15, 1984. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at extension 250. ~tt/-~~ RVL /de cc: Thomas Woodruff, Legal Counsel Don E. Smith, Chairman , District #7 Richard W. van Langen, P.E. Chief of Industrial Waste Bill Vardoulis, Director /Councilman, City of Irvine Lowry and Associates Brad Bateman, Districts Inspector ( F;T~'/ C H •CK N O GRO SS AM O U N f ( 7;l:~ v)~ OT llE ll I % I I NET • I D I SCOU NT D EDU CTI O N S D ISC. C l I E C I( cp ---·-----... ---~-----0 -------------------... -------------.--------------------,.._ .. _______ l' i 16 0 l I 1220 I I EL ECTROL.U RGY INC. 2 0 7 9 8 i I 1121 DUR YEA AVE NUE I j IRV IN E. CA LI FORN I A 927 14 j 1 11 14 )54 0 6 41 5 I I I I Ju 1 y J ' 8 L1 ! I 1 9 __ J i PAvrn rn E Co u nty Sanitation Districts of Orange County 7 50 0 .00 ! ! ORDER OF ' . $ I I I .,..... I ... , ,.1 ... ,. . ,.. ,11U:l ,1.1.11 ,., ., .. ; •1 ' I • • I ti ·• I .... , I I '' :I ·, I I I I '1 I I I '1 •• : 1.,1, ·, 11 1'") 11 1•" 111111 t..'! ....... ' 11111 1111'1 ••• : ... 1 • I ... DO LLA RS ' ! C H OCl <ER NAT IO N A L BAN K 1 1 I Doug las P ta 1d Office ~} I 1900 0 Macl\rt h 11 r Blvd. ,." ~$. / I 1 Irv in e , C A 9 2 715 / • / W '1 I . , G ._ t;, i -G. c:>( c · · z_ "(,,{-,.'-~ I i 11• o 2 o 7 g n 11 • •: i 2 2 o o o o a s •: ~ b a o o :i s b 2 11 • :i :i :i :i ' I ~-----~---M-------~-------------------·-------~-----~---------------•-M-•-----------© ( N AME ';1 AUOA l1 0 T l ,..l t f".&L l f:A C 1 ICC~ ~1 1 2 PLEASE OE IACll s runs BffOR E CAS IU rJ G R LF CR lNCI'. A t.t Olll J f == 1--------- --------- -------· - --~-- T 0 1 AL ELECTROLURGY IN C . t rvtne, Ca li f. ~ ; rl "%] ,, J t June 19, ~984 REF// 029 \ TO: Executive Committee STAFF REPORT FROM: Industrial Waste Division SUBJECT: High Water Volume Users At the regular Board Meeting of April 11 a non-agenda item was briefly discussed regarding the District's procedures for identifying, permitting, and billing industrial and commercfal dischargers. The matter was brought to the Board of Directors by the owner of a coin operated laundry who expressed his belief to the District No. 2 Board of Directors that he is being unfairly charged. Specifically, he complained that he was the only coin laundry in Brea or North Fullerton that was being charged sewer use fees. Staff was directed to review the matter and report back to the Boards. The purpose of this staff report is (1) to review the current permitting/billing practices of the District's Industrial Waste Division as they relate to high water volume users, ( 2) to provide various alternatives to the present prac- tices, and (3) to provide recommendations for future action. The specific contentions of the coin operated laundry owner are addressed in a separate report. REVIEW OF CURRENT PERMITTING/BILLING PRACTICES The District's efforts to identify non-domestic users and to issue permits began in a systemized way in the early 1970's and has continued since the adoption of the Regulations for Use of Districts Sewerage Facilities (Ordinance) in 1976. The main purpose of the permit system is to identify and track industrial users with the potential of discharging toxic, hazardous, or interfering substances that could harm the public, the District's sewerage facilities and operations or the environment. The discharge of these users is monitored and regulated accor.ding to the requirements of the Ordinance. During the early years of the program a staff of 4 office personnel and 4 inspectors began the time consuming process of identifying, permitting, and monitoring those industrial and commercial dischargers capable of discharging very high water flows (greater than 12,000,000 gallons per year) or discharging the toxic, hazardous, or interfering substances limited by the ordinance. By the end of 1980 the number of discharge permits issued had reached 550. In 1981, because of the increasing emphasis on detecting toxic wastes, the . -1- Districts added two industrial waste inspectors and one clerk to improve our monitoring and control efforts. By mid 1982, 650 firms were under permit. Focus remained on control of discharges to the sewer, rather than use fee admi- nistration. In late 1982 staff moved to the next stage, identifying industrial and commer- cial dischargers whose payments to the Districts through ad valorem taxes were insufficient to cover their fair share of the actual costs to convey and treat their volume of wastewater discharge. The basis for having industrial and com- mercial dischargers pay their fair share is the requirement of Federal and State regulations. Attachment 1 is the summary of Federal, State, and.Districts' User Fee Regulations. It was determined that a water use rate of 1,000,000 gallons or more per year would be an appropriate starting point. The number .of users in this size class would presumably be managable using the existing Industrial Waste Division staff and the cut-off of 1,000,000 gallons per year would approximate the break even point ---that is, the point at which dischargers with less than this rate would likely be paying their fair share through property taxes alone. Because of the effect of Proposition 13 and rising operation and maintenance costs, the cut-off for the break-even point may be lower. In the first quarter of 1983, District staff began to manually search the monthly or bi-monthly water billing records of the major water purveyors in our service area. One billing cycle was examined. Water customers whose ·usage during that particular billing cycle exceeded an equivalent yearly rate of 1,000;000 gallons were listed. Once identified, questionnaires were mailed to approximately 1300 firms (see Attachment 2). The questionnaires allowed us to: 1.) Determine the nature of the user's business (generally only their name is available from the water bill). 2.) Determine how much of the water they purchase is discharged to the sewer and how much is lost to consumptive use such as landscaping, evaporation, and product make-up. 3.) Determine if a permit is necessary. 4.) Determine if the discharger is paying for the full cost of services. Five hundred questionnaires were returned by the users. After evaluation by District staff, approximately three hundred of the users were determined to be bi Hable dischargers and have, accordingly, been invoiced ever since. This effort and parallel work has increase~ the present number of industrial and com- mercial permittees (Class I, II, and III-see Attachment 3 for a description of the classes) to approximately 1100. With the exception of part time temporary help during the summer of 1983, this increase was accomplished with the Industrial Waste Division staffing level first established in 1981 (5 office and 6 field inspection staff). All of this was accomplished while maintaining the previous permits and enacting stricter monitoring and enforcement efforts on industry. The approved 1984-85 budget will increase the authorized full time staffing level to 21 employees (7 office and 14 field employees). The next proposed step is to drop the volume cut-off point from 1, 000, 000 gallons per year to 750,000. -2- ALTERNATIVES TO PRESENT PRACTICES Our effort to permit industrial and commercial enterprises has been an ongoing long.;.term and gradual process. Staff resources have been limited during the last 8 years in the belief that it was the most cost effective approach to admi- nistering the program. Potential permittees have been identified through: 1.) Building permits; 2.) Telephone book surveys; 3.) Private informational services such as "Contacts Influential"; 4.) Field observations and contacts; 5.) Water billing information. Because of the time consuming process this gradual approach does mean that, during some fini.te length of time, two users under nearly identical situations may be treated differently until all users have been identified and, where appropriate, permitted. The following alternatives could be utilized: Delay Invoicing Any High Water Volume User Until All Users Are Identified - This approach would theoretically mean that all users would be treated in exactly the same way. However, this alternative would not necessarily produce equity. Today, many users are paying widely disparate amounts to the Districts through their ad valorem taxes, and many are not paying their fair share through the ad valorem taxes. Therefore, inequities will continue until the entire user base in Orange County is placed under permit. Our delaying permitting and invoicing will result in trading one set of inequities for another. In the meantime the revenue that we would otherwise receive would be lost. Further, we would be in violation of the Revenue Program adopted by the Boards in compliance with Federal requirements. ·During Fiscal Year 1983-84 we will receive between $4.5 and $5.5 million from industrial and commercial user surcharges and $1.0 mitlion in ad valorem taxes. Of that, the revenue from the high volume users under permit in the 1,000,000 to 12,000,000 gallon per year class is estimated to be ten percent of the total amount. A major drawback of this alternative, of course, is that it could take several years to identify and permit the entire user base estimated to be between 5,000 and 22,000 establishments. Search For Potential Permittees By District, City Or Other Zone Type - Under this approach District staff would conduct an intensive effort in a par- ticular geographical area so that all users in the area would be placed under permit at the same time. This alternative basically has the same inequities·as our existing method except that it would be based on location rather than volume. -3- Search For Potential Permittees By Industrial Type- Under this approach District staff would conduct an intensive effort on a par- . ticular industrial or commercial type based on Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code. For instance, all of the coin operated laundries could be sought out. This approach has two basic shortcomings. First, the selection of a particular user group is discriminatory because there is no basis for selecting a particular group, with the exception of giving high priority to firms that discharge potentially harmful substances to the system. Second, there is no adequate data base for finding particular user groups. Subscription informational services such as Contacts Influential do not provide a comprehen- sive listing of Districts' users for many standard industrial classifications. For instance, they identify only 67 coin laundries in Orange County. Water billing or business license information cannot normally be computer accessed by user type by most of the purveyors or licensing entities. Furthermore, Standard Industrial Classification is not usually available from the water billing or business license data. RECOMMENDED FUTURE ACTIONS 1. That permitting and invoicing should begin when high water users are iden- tified as billable users based on predetermined criteria, (continuation of the current practice) as follows: a) That the most appropriate way to systematically search for high water dischargers is to continue to use the criteria of high water use applied across the entire industrial and commercial base of the District's service area. (Our current action level of 1, 000, 000 gallons per year or more for investigating water users has resulted in the issuance of 300 new use permits over the previous cut-off of 12,000,000 gallons.) b) That the cut-off level now be dropped to 750,000 gallons per year to identify the next group of potential permittees and require them to pay their fair share. 2. a) That the water purveyor survey currently underway (see Attachment 4) be continued so that the Districts can determine what computer capa- bilities the purveyors have, and what computer capabilities they can develop to assist the Districts. This information is necessary to understand how the screening process can be made more effective. b) That the Districts investigate the feasibility of entering service contracts with the various water purveyors to develop computerized data searching capabilities. The early returns from the water pur- veyor survey indicate that many of them cannot presently meet our need. Costs of this service may vary dramatically among purveyors. Assuming a cost of $2500 to $5000 and a need for between 15 and 20 systems, a total cost of between $37,500 and $100,000 is estimated. However, it would greatly enhance our ability to identify firms sub- ject to the Districts' Use Ordinance and speed up the entire process. -4- 3. The 1984-85 budget approved by the Boards this month adds six positions (4 clerical and 2 inspection) to the Industrial Waste Staff. The four cleri- cal staff will be used to accelerate our efforts to identify, permit, and begin to invoice those users whose ad valorem taxes do not offset the actual cost to the Districts to convey, treat, and dispose of their sewage discharge. One full-time Clerk and two part-time Assistants will be hired to provide year round field visits to all water purveyors and field iden- tification of potential permit tees. They will collect the data from the water billing records and transmit that information to the Industrial Waste Division office staff. One full-time Clerk will also be hired to send out the Wastewater Discharge Questionnaires, follow-up on additional infor- mational data when necessary, issue the permit, and coordinate invoicing efforts with the Districts' Accounting Division. The two added Industrial Waste Inspectors that will be hired during the year will be assigned to enforce the categorical pretreatment standards mandated by EPA and will not be involved in identifying new permittees. 4. That after nine months (March, 1985) of experience in administering the program in this manner a follow-up staff report be submitted to the Executive Committee. The report would evaluate the effectiveness of the accelerated program and would provide recommendations for future actions. The additional permits, invoices, and potential collections problems may require an additional accounting clerk and computerized data management. -5- ATTACHMENT 1 SUMMARY OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND DISTRICTS' USER FEE REGULATIONS Section 204 (b)(l) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, corresponding California legislation in the State Water Code, and the administrative regula- tions implementing these legislative actions require that all user classes shall pay their proportionate share of the actual costs of operating and maintaining the Districts' sewerage system . In April, 1979, the Boards of Directors adopted a Revenue Program for the Districts, as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, which defines the structure and basis of the charges paid by all system users. The Districts' Revenue Program incorporates these Federal and State regulatory mandates which govern establishment of user charges. This program provides for two sources of funds to pay the operations and maintenance (O & M) costs of the Districts: 0 0 Ad Valorem taxes (as defined in EPA Regulations CFR 35.2140 (b)(2)) Surcharge for those non-residential, high-volume and/or high-strength dischargers whose ad valorem tax contributions are inadequate to pay their proportionate share of the Districts' 0 & M costs (as defined in EPA Regulation CFR 35.2140 (b)(3)). . The Districts have determined, and the State Water Resources Control Board has agreed, that our ex is ting ad valorem user charge sys tern allocates a propor- tionate share of the Districts' 0 & M costs to the residential and small non- residential user class. All other users of the system are subject to be permitted by the Industrial Waste Division, and must pay a surcharge (direct user charge) based upon the volume of wastewater discharged and the strength of the pollutants in the wastewater as evidenced by the amount of suspended solids (SS) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) found in their discharge. Further, any firm that discharges specified pollutants (heavy metals, toxics) regardless of volume, is subject to permitting and monitoring. These users receive a credit against their quarterly user charge for the ad valorem taxes they pay to the Districts. Each District establishes user charge rates for their industrial dischargers on an annual basis after adoption of the budget in July of each fiscal year. The 1983-84 annual industrial user fees for the s even Districts is: Flow: $346 .83 -$249 .35 per Suspended Solids: Biochemical Oxygen Demand: 51.44 per 58.15 per million gallons thousand pounds thousand pounds COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY , CALIFORN IA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE !EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAYJ ATTACHMEN T 2 The County Sani t3.tion Districts of Orange County, since 1970, ha•.:e been permitting and collecting user charges from those dischargers whose taxes on .the Ad Valore:n (?rope.:ty Tax) bill are not sufficient to pay ~he costs for treating and disposing of their wastewacer discharged to the sewer . The Districts have identified your b uilding as possib l y being one that falls in the afo rementi on ed category. The costs of treating w~stewater is computed by deter~ining the volume and st~ength of the discharge . Generally, the amount from the City water meter less 5% (for landscaping , evaporation, e tc.), is assumed to be the amount that is discharged to the sewer . Beca use of the large number of users in the Districts service area, it is impractical to test every wastewater discharge for its constituents. Therefore, unless shown othe r~ise by the user, the strength of wastewater is assumed to be 250 ppm for biochemical oxygen demand (BQD) and 250 ppm for suspended solids. These numb ers approximate the strength of comestic waste. After the use r charge ~as beer. computed, the tax collected through the ad valorem taxes are credited against the user charge . The deficit is then c~arged against :he user . !n o ~de r for the Districts to proper ly calculate the amount of water you discharge to the sewer, :t is necessary to complete the enclosed appli- cation and return it within two (2) weeks. If the application is not returned , the District3 will assume all water purchased is discharged to the sewerage system. TELEPHONES: AREA COD E 714 540-2910 962-2411 Page Two Fiscal year average user charges are as follo ws: Flow $/Million Gallons $ Suspended Solids $/1000 lbs. $ B.O.D. $/1000 lbs. $ It is the Districts' intent to collect all charges that are due. If you have any questions, please contact Jim Wybenga in the Industrial Waste Division, 540-2910, Ext. 253 . lf~--- Blake P. Anderson Director of Operations /km Enclosure I' I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ?. 0. SOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, C ALI F"ORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OF"F-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) WASTEWAlER DISatARf!: QLESTI~NL\Ift NO TE TO SIGNING OFFICAL: Please complete all sections of this questionaire, attaching additional sheets as necessary, for completi on of any section. Should any questions arise concerning this application, please contact the Industrial Waste Division. SECTION A - 1. Business or Building Name Mailing Address: 2. Service Address: City Zip Phone 3. Brief description of service activity a"t premises 4 . Assessor Parcel Numbers and addresses for all parcels owned and/or TEl..CiaH O N CS: A R CA COCC 7 1 4 540-2910 962·2411 occupied by the business or building __________________________________ __ SECTION B - 1 . Landscaped area in square fee"t ~------------------------------ 2 . Tons of Cooling Tower capacity ~------------------------------ 3. Is there any other areas where significant water evanoration can occur? (Explain) ____________________________________________________ ___ (over! Name , title, and telephone number of person to contact concerning information provided in this questionnaire. (Please print) Name Phone I affirm that a ll information in this questionnaire is accurate to the best of my knowledge. CLASS I ATTACHMENT 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REGULATIONS FOR USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, JULY 1, 1983 DESCRIPTION OF USER PERMITS 1. Has a discharge flow of 50,000 gallons or more per normal working day or 12 million gallons or more per year; 2. Involves the discharge of wastewater which may contain at any given time, any of the components as specified in Section 204, Limitations on Radioactive Wastes, or Section 208, Limitations on Wastewater Strength; or, 3. Is subject to final Federal catego rical pretreatment standards. CLASS II 1. Has a discharge flow of less than 50,000 gallons per normal working day or 12 million gallons or less per year; 2. Has a charge for use greater than the ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District, exclusive of debt service; and, 3. Is not otherwise required to obtain a Class I permit . CLASS III 1. Has a discharge flow of less than 50,000 gallons per normal work ing day or 12 million gallons or less per year; 2. Has a discharge consisting of only sanitary waste at a presumed domestic waste equivalent (B.O.D. and suspended so l ids of 250 milligrams per liter); 3 . Has a charge for use greater than the ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District, exclusive of debt service; and, 4. Is not otherwise required to obtain a Class I or II permit. . , i' , . . - ,1~ COUNTY · SANITATION DISTRICTS / ............ TEl...El"MCN ES: j 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ARe:A ccoe: 714 540·29, 0 962-2411 11 P . CJ. sax 8127. FOUNTAI N VALLEY. CAL I FORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS A V ENUE (EUCL I D OFF"·RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWA Y) Apri .l 5, 1984 REF# 518 • A TIEN TI ON: SUBJECT: ATTA CHMEN T 4 Water Department Managers User Survey Tile County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts ) are initiating a survey to ascertain the capabilities of the numerous water purveyors in the County to supply the name£ of their customers using in excess of 750,000 gallons per year (100,000 cubic feet per_ year). -Tile.District 1 s current practice for identifying new high volume 1.'iastewater discharge perm i ttees is to visit each ·water purveyor. Districts employees manua.1 l y review the billing records of the purveyor ta find high wa t er users. The Districts subsequently contact the user to determine i f a discharge permi t is required. Tnis procedure is extremely inefficient and delays us from iden- tifying new permittees. Therefore, we are conducting this survey to determine your record searching capabilities. · Please complete the attached survey form and return it to the Di stricts in the enclosed envelope. Your cooperation will aid the Districts in its efforts to establ i sh a comprehens i ve County-wide '"'astewater discharge permi t program. If you have any questions, please contact SPA /de Enc l osure Slake P. Anderson Director of Oper ations extension 253. .. • I f ~ WA TER PURVEYOR SUR VEY FORM Name of person completing form: ~~~~~~~~~~- Please answe r the fo ll owi ng questions as accurate l y as possible : 2 .) Estimated number of customers using i n excess of 100,000 cubic feet per yea r 3.) Is your agency computerized? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4.) Do you have t he capab i lity to sear c h yo ur fi l es accord i ng to vo l ume purc hased? 5.) Are you willing to supp l y the Districts with a computer prin t out of the high water users? 6.) What is the cost of providing this service? 7.) Are th e re any comm e nts your agency wishes to make? June 19, 1984 STAFF REPORT TO: Executive Committee FROM: Industrial Waste Division SUBJECT: Brea Coin Operated Laundry At the regular Board Meeting of April 11 a non-agenda item was briefly discussed regarding the District's procedures for identifying, permitting, and billing industrial and commercial dischargers. The matter was brought to the Board of Directors by the owner of a Coin Operated Laundry who expressed his belief to the District No. 2 Board of Directors that he is being unfairly charged. Specifically, he complained that he was the only coin laundry in Brea or North Fullerton that was being charged sewer use fees. Staff was directed to review the matter and report back to the Boards. The purpose of this staff report is to review the specific file of Brea Coin Laundry in accordance with the owner's request and the direction of the Boards. Mr. Richard Friedrich owns Brea Coin Laundry located at 614 South Brea Boulevard in Brea. He was identified as purchasing approximately 3 million gallons of water per year and a potentially billable discharger during a review of the City of Brea's water records in accordance with our existing procedures (see separate report on procedures). A Wastewater Discharge Questionnaire was mailed to him which he completed and mailed to the Districts in March, 1983. Analysis of his response led to the issuance of a Permit and invoicing began effective May 1, 1983. On December 19, 1983, Mr. Friedrich first contacted District staff by telephone contending that he was not being treated equally with respect to other coin laundries in Brea and North Fullerton. He had recently discovered that the laundries in his area were not yet paying the use fees that he was paying. Staff explained the process currently underway. He countered that the laundries he was aware of were also users of greater than 1 million gallons of water per year and that until they were s ubject to use fees he wouldn't pay his. We informed Mr. Friedrich that it was District policy to invoice users as they became known to us and that the process of identifying all users would take time. Similar phone conversations covering the same issues occurred between District s t aff and Mr . Friedri ch on January 26 and March 16 , 1984. District's General Counsel addressed these issues in a letter to James L . Rubel, Esquire, on March 27, 1984 (Attachment A). The Districts General Manage r wrote to Mr. Friedrich o n April 3, 1984 (Attachment B). Mr. Friedrich asked to be heard by the District No. 2 Board of Directors as an off agenda item at the regular meeting of April 11, 1984. In addition to the issue outlined above, he claimed that the amount he was paying was approximately twice the amount he should be paying. The Board directed staff to meet with Mr. Friedrich to attempt to resolve the issue, if possible . Staff met with Mr. Friedrich on April 13th. The results of the meeting held April 13 were outlined in a letter from the District's Director of Operations to Mr. Friedrich (Attachment C). Staff evaluation of Mr. Friedrich's assertions is as follows: 1. Mr. Friedrich is correct that, until early 1984, he was the only permitted coin laundry in Brea or North Fullerton . This came about for two reasons: First, several of the laundries are close to the 1,000,000 gallon per year cut off. Sampling of only one billing cycle is used to make the initial volume determination from water company records . Apparently some of the coin laundries just missed using water at the cut off rate during the sampled billing cycle. Second, the data reviewing thousands high volume users in of the coin operated search , conducted manually by District s t aff of water accounts, did locate 86 miscellaneous Brea and Fullerton but apparently overlooked some laundries in question. Since March 1984, 67 coin operate~ laundries have been identified County- wide (four in Brea and two in Fullerton) that exceed the one million gal l on per year criteria and questionnaires have been sent to each . Staff is in the process of reviewing and issues permits to those for which permits are warranted under existing policy . 2 . After a thorough audit of the water use and user fee billing data we have determined that Mr. Friedrich is correct that the estimate on which his 1983-84 billing is based was too high. The sample water billing cycle used for extending the 12 month estimate was higher than average, and an arith- metic error was committed in extending the amount. This error has been corrected to Mr . Friedrichs apparent satisfaction. ...... ··~ ~M( AOUAll(C .. o .... ~. woOOAU,.,. .AH A. WATTS ~NNAAO A. s,.. ... i:n, JR ~NICL. "· SPAAOL.IN CIA S. L.(VIN 'A" T. Wll.L.,..AN .IZAHNC Q. AT •INS ATTACHMENT A \.Aw o.-,.1c:cs or SUIT'C 1020 CA1..rFORN1A lll'IRST-bAN" eu11..01NG 1055 NORTH MAIN STFIE.CT SANTA ANA, CA&.IFORNIA 9Z701 TCL.CPHONC (7•""'1 83S-6212 March 27, 1984 James L. Rubel, Jr., Esq. 3432 Via Oporto Newport Beach, Ca. 92663 Re: Countv Sanitation District No. 3 Dear Jim: TC.L.tCOPICA .17••1 835 •7787 c.AllL.' AOOAtSS AOA•OOO TC1.'". ao-... 29• I am in receipt of your letter dated March 21, 1984, regarding the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, and the application of industrial sewer discharge permits and applicable fees. First, let me indicate to you that of course all of the records of the .Districts are open to public inspec- tion at any time during regular business hours. The.singular exception to this rule would be the individual permittee, be '-"it a corporation or otherwise, has a right to have his financial information about his business entity kept from public.disclosure. All other information, including the terms and conditions of the permit, would be available. With regards to the apparent application of the Ordinance, I believe your advice to your elient was. ac~urate, in terms of not having any defense. On behalf of the Districts, I would suggest to you that they have been undertaking a program for some period of time to ~nsure that all known dischargers required .to have permits in fact secure them as required by Ordinance. However, limitations on Staff do pose some serious constraints in this regard. Accordingly, the District must rely on records of the other public agencies who provide the domestic water to the perrnittee, and at the present time, the District is requiring all perrnittees who discharge more than 1 million gallons per year to come into full compliance. This enforcement program has been quite successful, and we anticipate being able to contact all dischargers in the approximate level of 750,000 gallons per year in the next few months. With specific reference to your client, I would suggest to you that he contact Mr. James Wy~enga of the Industrial waste Division at the Sanitation District, who will be most ·~appy to assist him in any regard. His telephone number is 540-2910. 4"""-· • Page Two March 27, 1984 If you have any other questions, just give me a call, and I will be happy to review them with you. TLW:pj cc: Mr. F.A. Harper Mr. J.W. Sylvester Mr. B-Anderson .~r. J. Wybenga ·Miss Rita Brown Very truly yours, ROURKE & WOODRUFF ~ /it.LL-_ Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel / Ii Ii ·...,,_; ATTACHMENT B COUNT'{ SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX 8127. f"'OUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIF"ORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE: ( E:UCL.10 OF'F·RAMP. SAN DIE.GO f"'RE:E:WAY) Mr. Richard P. Friedrich 8333 Fourth Street Buena Park, CA 90621 Re: Class II Permit No. II-2-218 Dear Mr. Friedrich: April 3, 1984 This letter is in response to your inquiry to Supervisor Stan.ton• s office April 2. Your concern, which has been previously expressed to members of our siaff, is that you a~e paying permit user fees which your competitors are not paying. Presently we are permitting all commercial businesses who discharge more than 1 million gallons per year. The water use information is collected from records of other agencies, principally cities, who provide domestic water to the individual businesses. This, of course, is time consuming and because of staff limitations, our field personnel have been instructed to collect water use informa~ion on those firms using 1 million gallons a year or_ more. . . we anticipate being able to permit all commercial dischargers who discharge 750,000 gallons an~ more per year during this.year. I hope this explains why some may not be permitted by us at other businesses of a like nature this time. FAH:93 enclosure cc: supervisor Stanton's Office Attn: Scott Morgan c4:f.~2±~ General Manager :: I ""· ,, .,, .... __ ATTACHMENT C ·. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. C. E[ICX 8127. F'CUNTAIN VAL.LEY •. C:AL.JF'CRNIA 92708 10844 El.LIS AVENUE (£UCL.JO CF'F'·RAMP. SAN OIEGC F'REEWAY) April 13, 1984 REF# 546 Brea Coin Laundry c/o Richard P. Friedrich 8333 Fourth Street Buena Park, CA 90621 Attention: Richard P. Friedrich Subject~ Districts Meeting of 4/13/84 TE&.EPHQN l:!I: ARCA COQC: 714 S4C·::Z910 962·2411 The county Sanitation Districts of Orang.e County would like to highlight the important points in r.egards to the meeting between yourself and Districts• Staff on the above referenced date: 0 Tile Districts understand that you expect a full refund of monies paid to date. 0 The Districts will s·trive towards making a decision within approximately the next 60 days, regarding the applicability of the fees to your facility. 0 Billing fa·r the 3rd and 4th quarter wil 1 not be sent to you. The reason for this is due to the fact that the 1st and 2nd. ·· quarters were overestimated, therefore no subsequent billings will be necessary until reconciliations are finalized. 0 During the meetfng the Districts .detailed the efforts of the Industrial Waste .Division towards identifying high water users and in particular coin operated laundries. If there are any questions, please feel free to BPA/JW/de cc: Fred A. Harper Wayne Sylvester Bill Butler Accounting Department Blake P. Anderson Director of Operations v :~ ~ ;·\ ., RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS JULY 11, 1984· -7:30 P .. M. ~ ::t=:a I• I~ I, ·b: ;.1 ( i.: FLINO NC 1, .. I . ··- 1 I ;·! l·I j111 I,. I I t· ~~ ::t:> Ci) rn z t::1 ::t:> ....... --f rn ~ -a '::s:a:: ~ 0 ::i> I I t:j -(/) --f :;::c ~ n -it (,/') :: :x> I' .......... ~ a ' .. lU R R A tlT N 0 • c· 6 c; 'Hi" (16~4b5 C6q466 :t69467 !)Ec;'46E l'JE C?4f-IJ (!6947ll 069471 'J(.9472 ('6'3'173 f.'fCJ474 !Jf.';47f, rin".1476 'If. q4 77 uE:~ne r~t;47q f'f.9'1~0 fl6~'H~l c S94 e:i (1(-9483 r: j:,q tq>11 %C.:4S" f6~4EE Gf '?4 fl7 '.•69lt8Sl 'if,94~«:' C'E-~'19U ':l!-94C)l 1'69492 "f. 'l4 c:i3 1H: '?'! 94 (·~'?II i;i~ i;694C?f; %94q7 '·E,04f:?l< lj6C?'+'.?9 l'6°t('(J rjf!C:51l1 )6q5P.2 ~(:.9~1)3 (·695C.lf h( 5!: c.~; !J~ c; ~Of· 06«;1!)('7 {:60!)'J~ Ll 6 c; 5 li ~ ( 9199 -JT OIST WCRKING C~PITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/C7/8~ P~Gf F[FORT NUMBER AP43 ( COUNTY ·SANIHT ION DISTRICTS-Of .. ORANGE COUNTY-···-·····------· · · .. VENDOR A-~&D ELECTRONICS S~Lrs ABC MElAL-S SUPPLYt INC• ~GM ELE'CTllONICS, INC. ~CTJON INSTRUMfNT~t INC. ~.JR CALJFCR"JIA AIR PRPDUCTS & C~EMJCALStlNf. AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCT~ AN~HEIM SAW SHOP INr. T~r ANCHOR PAC~ING CO. v.o. Al\tERSON l'lf1UA P.ft., CCRP • AP.RO~-Plscc, INC. A~qOWHEAO ELECTRJC CORP. ~SSOCIATED tABORATCRIES P.ANPOLFH f.USTIN CO. AUTOHATEO cteURRlNG SUPFLY UACH~R~CH INSTi CP. OAK(R PLY~OOC CO., INC. BASS[TT nusJNESS INTERJO~S BE~CON EAY ENTtRF~lSESt INC. ocr! c. BO TT IE l:IEVCll el~ 80~ RENTAL CO. ~LACK & CEC~ER MFG. CO. POYLE lNGI~[ERJNG CORP fRISTOL P~RK H[DJfAL GRFet INC CPT CALIFCR~IA. INC. CS COMF.\NY CALTF. ASSOC. OF SA~. AGENCIES CAM8RJLGE FILTEP CORP. CJ\REY SJGt\ GRAJ.ltICS CH~~~EST ·Jf\OUSTnlr~. l~C. rH~VRON U.S.A •• J~r. CJNCIN~ATI lJM[ rQUJP., INC. CLAPK ~YE ~APCW~RE COAST If\SLR-NC[ AGENCY CC(E PARMFR IN~TRUMENT co. CONNElL-CH~VROLET COf\IROCI< CCMPl\NY CONSCLJOATrr. ELECTPJC~l OJST. COOP£R ENERGY ~f~VICES CR4NE ~fYC~ CORF. C R C W f\ FE f\C f. ~ ~ ll i: ,, l Y C G • , I f\: C • CAL CC~SOLI~ATED ~ATER DEC~ER JNST~U~[NT SUPPLY CO. oc:co CLAJHS PAID 06/13/64 Af'OUNT f,lj 3. 56 $796•66 ~179.(16 $J,91f2.6U !61H.CO H 'l 3 • S6 $~ 8. (13 DESCP. I PTl ON OFFICE SUPPLIES STEEL STOCK . ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AIR FARE .. SPECIALTY GASES LAB SUPPLIES ··----···-:!lai)•OO .. . . .. ....... TOOL-REPAIRS -· .. -. ...... -- $877.~8 SH5.15 "'t2lt616.56-- $47.7') 1372a'l1 -. f. !i ~ • I) , ---·-.. S457e77 s35. ilr Ui4:'!7.47 · ·· H97.72 $3H'h8f.t ~.s.3c.oo S961).00 iu-2.ac H.ttlo.oa -- i51.s1 $ 6 6 ' 2 .! 3 • 7 5 $2(,. (l(l $745.03 !J9.6fi uan.!11" $27 • f{A 1499.26 -s2;i20. J~ ·· $5,119.!'3 UeB't.?.~5 f.1'1~•45 111s.on $~ 1. If :J 1.6').~4 $lql.f.1t $2t9'16e9'? ·$5dlf5•66 U t55ti.Etl s11,1c;1.r..<> .$~4.70 Slt564elf9 .tl9fl.f1f. PUMP PARTS WELDING SUPPLIES -·-CHEM I CAL COAGULENTS . ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRIC CART PARTS ---· 'lAB -·AHAL VS IS. - TUB I NG ENGINE PARTS -ELECTRICAL··suPPLIES SHALL HARDWARE OFFICE FURNITURE TRUCK MAINTENANCE CRANE RIGGING CLASSES ELECTRIC CART PARTS TRASH.DISPOSAL TOOLS ENGR. 7-8 PRE-EHPtOYHENT EXAMS WORD PROCESSING HAINTENANCE FREIGHT CASA CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FREIGHT SAFETY SUPPLIES FERRIC CHLORIDE TANK RENTAL ENGINE OIL CONTRACTOR PW-101 · SHALL' "HARDWARE ANNUAL TRAVEL ACCIDENT INSURANCE PREHIUH SAFETY SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS BUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ENGINE REPAIRS RETENTION PW-lOlf RETENTION PW-105 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL GAUGES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -.,-. ! : • ::: >. I· N ~ '! ;·! J:> G') rn :z t::j J:> .-. -I rn 3 ::t:t: I-' C> :l:> I r- t:::j .._. (/') -I :.:::0 ~ Cl -I (/') :::: ):> I -....,) :::: FUMP. NO l.JARR MH NO. ~f'?51fl 069~·11 l.:f.9~12 %951!, t'I f. <; ~ l ,, u-0 !"1!5 r.6°5H. f·fi r:1~ 1 7 ')~': !'i' ~ i!t "~ 19 r S<J~·:'l~ H!'3!':21 t•f:'?~~:> '6~~23 ~r.,q~·?.lf ~-f.95£~1 {'fC~~f: <:'! c.5;7 '(·7'::21< f. 6C':'!1,·9 f'f.'? 5:''• 'fCl~31 •;~~~32 ,~t: 9r.~~· ·~~.c;~'l?lt 'JE:9~,!i :·t;0~?-6 C'f<;!;,q ·~(;. c: ~:ti! '·6 ~ .. =-: '': !; 6 °!1 If•: •:f.=>~41 , f ".15 1•2 ~~(, ~~ 4 ·" ( f t.-i::.4 '• ~ f. 9 ~; 4 ~) f·(, Ci f"o'f (. "f,0 ~'·7 t6°f4A 'lfc_.:~49 ;'(Ci~!: lj :: f. '? !1f· 1 '.'l· r,5~1? t1 f·~5~.3 ilf: 9~ ~'· !!f i: ~~r; 9199 -JT 01$1 WGRKIN6 CAPTT~L • PPOCESSJNG DATE ~/07/R~ PAGt REPORT NUMOER AF't3 ..... ' COUNTY SAMITATION 01$TRICTS OF ORANG£-COUNTY \'ENDO fl OELl\f JfLO \JRP. OllSEL coiTROL CORf 0 I G I ~ Y I\ E CC I~ F U 1E' ~ SE RV I C ( S ORI-SL TOEt INC. OU~N EObAROS CORP. O~YER JNSTQUM£NTt INC. E.D.A.~111\C. & ~.p. LINDSTROM ~IH CO~~ANY. INC. [AST~l•l\:t INC. ENCHANTER, INC. ENGJ~EfRS SALES-SfRVJCE CO. FALCON CJSFCSAL SEPVICE FEPE~AL ~)~f.tSS COP.F. FT5CHEP & 0 0RTER.CO. FROST ENGINfERING SERVICES CO. CITY OF FULLE~TON GMC TRUCK R COACH 6~NAHL LU~~ER to. ~[NfR~L TELEPHO~E CO. GIERLJCH-~ITCHELLt JNC. •H1CH co~r-·o~v H4LFPJN SUPPLY CO. HA~qINGTO~ I~OUSTPI~L FLASTICS fllCHlaEL !-ltIN7 HOUSE OF e~TTERJ[S HYOrl01[\( JNDUSTPJAL THRF.AOEO PRO~UClS rncct AM I= Ar ER I~STPU~ENTATJON LAOCR,TORY,INC IRV!~~ INCU~TRJJL LANOSCAf~ J!Wltlf.: RANCH WATER OISTRJCT J~~~EN TOOLS & ALLOYS ~l~AN OEAR!NGS E SUFFLY l<ELLY Fir>£ CO. kl~G ~EtPJ~G, INC. KIRST PUMP E. M~CHH!r ~Oi1KS l<LF.fN-LINE CORP ~OP~fkS CO•t INC. l ~ N UNIFORM SUFPlY CO t.0 .~;.s., ir•c. •J.P.. t.ti!'.'£\.Jlf-en. L[WCO ElfCT~IC CO. Ll~~TJ~G nISlPIPLT~RSt INC. LYON$ l\T•L sEru~JTYt INC. ~IOLA~t PFG. cePr. Nl\TTrtJAt. SCNTCS CLtlMS PAID l6/13/8~ AMOUNT 1489.At> $799.'tlJ $96R.OO $699.0:? Ut~.21 \59.14 iu~.oo t2;56t.R1 $193.89 $3,500.00 Stt!l42.tt0 $Ht761.3'S !95.6~ 1. 3 7 t ·• ? (> -·--- t 32~.76 $150.62 . $7. 65 r.. 02.. . - S3tlfq3.P.8 $2e5')6.74 !5tH6•31l $3lfl.srn 12ll.41 S3t510e35 $~4.8:­ :f.4 7. 4 iJ 1033•41'. $5~·1·?.C q21f.I)? Ut~?(l.t!: s2.111.20 't 4. fl '1 . ·-$ ~ 7 • 7 (: . - UOJ .~3 $J6:1, lf9 $7,~~5.55 :t1t~·54.72 H'.la.3·l1 S3;.SA7eOC S~t956.c.:i!' 1163.43 it .1(12.35 1%( •• 4 'l '111f.n n..s.,2.oc 1~3.79 $~f>~.99 · DCSCRlf'TJON HOSE ENGINE REPAIRS MINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE ENGINE OIL PA I NT SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY --ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OCEAN MONITORING ENGINE· PARTS SLUDGE HAULING DELIVERY SERVICE ·--PI PE ·SUPPL I ES VALVES WATER USEAGE -TRUCKS LUHDER/ ODOR CONTROL CHEMICALS TELEPHONE -· · · · · ··REGULATOR PARTS --· LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES SHALL HARDWARE EMPLOYEE MILEAGE BATTERIES ... ·-·-ENG INE··o IL· SHALL HARDWARE OFFICE SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE WATER USEAGE ---·TOOLS -- BEARING SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES BEARING SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ... -·---·BUILDING MATERIALS UNIFORM RENTAL WELDING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES ELECTRIC CART PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL FREIGHT LAB SUPPLIES c·· ( - ( .I :J •··' ~l ::: ·'1 1·1 I' I' '·· ):> :n ,, z =' :&:> --4 -I ,, ::s: =t.t:: .....a :;::) I> =' --e :.n -I :;a ...:.... :-> -I :.n ::: 'f> I ..N ::: ( ( FUND NO ql99 • JT OIST UCRKING CtPITAL PROCESSING OATE 5/J7/~4 F~GE P.EPORT NUMBER ~F43 W~Rl<f.NT rm. !: '•5t (J 6~~!i7 69 5~.~ (1601)~q .:'()950 ( f ~ ~F· l -~ !)~ ~~? r.,, a ~t~ ~f=q564 Q~."5tr; ,, f :; 5(loi:.. ! f· ~; ~-f 1 ii(: G~6fl •lE:~fif\5 ~Gr;!"·H ~f. C:· !' 71 ~'{ ~~7? ;.l. c. i::., 73 ''( 9!'-H '.'~C::f.7'i '•6c;!'-7o ('~~~ 77 ~: ,_, '~ ~. 7 p "S'?!>7~ -~ f cp-~ P. !J '!f. c; ~ ~ 1 ~' (,<" !'-f.2 l~ 6 tl~H3 ~ f.0 5(•11 .... !: ~~,l:~ :;~,c!·:H: (' b c ~1-'7 ·:· ~ c;. ~· OP. r f ~ !"tf•5 •• i;i:-:~c;n :: ( <"·t tJ 1 "I:~!" ~2 u.c_.i::.93 ef.G':.qlf '·'= q!:r:'5 (_. ~ c c;rJ(, r, i=. c, ~ cq rii: '7!"1<;~ \.If.Cl~. ?9 !·n~f. G'l r 6 '?r-t; 1 COUNTY SANITATION··oJSTRICTS OF ORiNGE COUNTY. VENDOP CCCIDF~TAL CHEMICAL CORF. OLYMPIC CHEMIC~L co~ OMICRON WELDING SUFPLY, JNC. OPPNGE VALVE & ~JTTING CO. COlJf\•TY CF GRANGE COU~TY SA~ITATJO~ DISTRICTS OF PFG I~DUSTRJESt lNC. FACJFJC ·SAFETY EOUIPMfNT CO. FACJFIC BELL PARTS Ut\LJr1 1TEC ~FARSO~S LAWNMO~f~ CENTER PEMHALL CO'P.Af\!Y Pf.P~Y fCUIFMENT COP.P. TOH PE"SlCH PJCKYIC~ FAPfR PROOUCTS f"OHMASTER hAROLO FRirROSE JC[ PAJNDCW tJSPOS.AL co. I\ E 0 VAL V f C 0 • t ltJ C·. llff Rf.GISTER RICl-ftRDSC~ e LE~CUEF c~. ThSODOP.E ROeJNS FCRO ~A ~l CON INC • SANO DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS SA~TA AN.A RIVEP FLOOD YVONNE SCt-l.IAP CITY OF SE.AL BE~CH SE~P.S, ROEBUCK F. CO. ~1-fAf~ROCK sur~·L y SMITH ~1~£ ~ SUFPLYt INC 50UTll[P.N CHIF. EDJ~ON CO. SO. Chla G.AS CO. ~OUTHEHN COUNTIES OIL CO. SCOTT STEVfN5 THE rnPPL I rRs ~lJf.ETlAl\;C CC. CH~PLE~ f. l~O~lS THUHis nPr.s. HAPS T~OMPSO~ LACCUfR co. T~CR TfMPCPARY SERVICES T~~~SA~ERJC~ ~EL~V-Lt INC. H. o. TDff?Jf[ TRUCK R ~LTO SUPPLY, INC. rnuF:"SOATL LABS TlJIHSAL(S ll~J(llli rJL CO. OF C/,LIF. CLAIMS PA10 06/15/84 ORANGE COUNTY ~r.OUNT $6,628.31 u 0 t 12 1 • lf 8 ··-..... $166. 3? S277.59 $ 76fu 62 $3,828-99 st.099.6~ . OE SCP I PTJO rJ CAUSTIC SODA . CH LOR I NE .... WELDING SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES . ..... --· s 1 • "8 8. 8 6 . -·---.. PRE.EMPLOYMENT EXAMS REPLENISH WORKERS' COHP. FUND PAINT SUPPLIES SAFETY.SUPPLIES UB.52 nae.01 t529.09 $81.94 TEL EHETER I NG TRUCK PARTS LAWNMOWER SUPPLIES TOOLS $3,~53.~l ENGINE PARTS . --·-··· $575•70 .. ··------·-···· CWPCA -coNFERENCE EXPENSES $2q~.65 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES s2.ooc.oo i3 'J. ~o S3H. OU l6?.51f "'ffl 5. 1 (I --· ··- $ 2ilt836. 30 :t37.18 $700• Otl · $523.64 Slt3'l().'J{J -$l2•C}2 t.126. 7~ $887.00 $971. :.>4 1121.l')Q $221763.'•1 f.'ft5lf7.70 - t3lt'~45.3S ~t·:1.(-.p i2,1u,.22 l39.G~ t3%.3!J 1~2. (; "· SJ •'t66.lf~ :iq~ a• '1 'l Slt35tJ;,4~ $132.99 $1,ql,.9,, $2•'t'M.!1fi $1!!1.f:B qi2.rn POSTAGE .... I NDUSTR I Al WASTE SAMPLING I CE TRASH DISPOSAL FREIGHT --·-·· tEGAl .. ADVERTISING RETENTION 3-21-2R TRUCK PARTS ·csDOC ·07-HANHOLE REPAIRS OFFICE FORMS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FEE --EMPLOYEE-MILEAGE WATER USEAGE TOOLS SHALL-HARDWARE, TOOLS PLUMBING SUPPLIES POWER . NATURAL. GAS. - DIESEL FUEL EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ·puMP PARTS/PAINT SUPPLIES/TOOLS TUBING ELECTRIC MOTOR OFFICE SUPPLIES PAINT SUPPLIES TEMPORARY HELP ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS -·-AIR SAMPLING PIPE SUPPLIES GASOLINE ( •; ~· "'' 1 .. ::: )::::f I .!::' ·:::· ·: )> :n .,., z :::j l'> ....... -I '"Tl -:--··-:rt: __. ::::> )> :::j -:n -I :::c ....... :I -I :n :::: i> •• c::-:::: FUND ~O ·91qQ -JT DIST WCRKJNG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/07/84 PAG[ Rf PORT NUMBER AP~3 il COUNTY S~NITATION OJST~JCTS OF ·OR~NGt::··COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/13/A~ ~J f. R fi ;. t; T f-:0 • :~501:(•~ ~f. C..t r,3 "f.~1 c. r 4 f•6 c !-fJ5 ~1 6 c. E-"6 ·: (-. c: t-; ~\ 7 06t;f:.~(l ':f c ~· ~~ ·~ f c., ~ l •J ,., l «:'6 l 1 f'f Cf 1 :! t'69f.: 1~ r• 6t'(>1 II I.' €--Ci~ l 5 "f-. f?f..] 6 ~: f. '.'f. l 7 ~,,. 'H::-1 ~ SUHHARY #1 OPER FUND 112 OPER FUND #3 OPER FUND #3 ACO FUHD VENDOR UNISTRUT LOS ANGELlS UNITED FAkCfL sr~VJC[ U~ITEC STATES ELfVATO~ CORf. V~R SClfNTJFIC VALLF.Y CITifS 5U~rLY CO. VALVf. SERVICr.s, H~c. VARfCt me. VARIAN/JNSTPUMFNl ~lVISJON lr:-K-M C:JVISlON ~AUKFSH' fNGIN[ SE~VICENTER WfST£R~ PROCESS OfSJGN, INC• WESTERf\ -~.I IRE & ALLOYS ~HITE. Flf\[ & VERVJlLE WHITNEY MACHINERY~ IHC. HIOMflS L. WOODRUFF• INC. GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES ZIP TE~PCP!RY f F.PSONN[L · TOTH CLAIMS PAID 06/13/64 #5 OPER FUND /16 OPER FUND HJ OPER FUND #7 F/R FUND #11 OPER FUND # 13 ACO FUND #5&6 OPER FUND JT OPER FUHD CORF SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND SELF FUN DE 0 WORKERS 1 COMP. INSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/13/84 ( AMOUNT S90.59 s22.s1 ·· $127.25 $132. q3 $38 .. 6 1• 't617e'12 S527.ti7 s2q1.so $34lt. 23 $l,9VJ.59 $2:?5•" r. H14J.36 u,J5'5.56 ... ··$1,531f•D2 Hl,663.'JO t2ns.10 ··-Of SCR I PTI ON STEEL STOCK DELIVERY ·SERVICE· PLANT #1 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE LAB SUPPLIES ·PIPE SUPPLIES. SHALL HARDWARE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ·LAB SUPPLIES· PIPE SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS REGULATOR PARTS WELDING SUPPLIES DEEP OCEAN S(UDGE DISPOSAL STUDY -···· E NG I N E -·PARTS · ·· LEGAL SERVICES PIPE SUPPLIES · t2R7• 'ti -· . · ··· -· ·TEMPORARY· HELP·· ·t382•1Ale73 =======~========= $ AMOUNT 127.50 5 ' 1 1 7 • 5 7 . . . . . . -·-. . -· -.. -.. 8,2lt6.38 21,321.ltO 321. 57 lt0.38 2,691.75 66 '233. 75 ···--·-·-.. 6,913.78 300.00 23.29· 178,530.47 34.790.86 76 ~-50 ...... . 3,828.99. 53,617.54 $382,181.73 ( ( • ::: to I : µ .. ::: ;'! I' J:> Ci> [!J ...::- t:::t :t> t--t -I rr1 3: ==tt: 1--' C> J:> I I t:::I t--t (/) -I ::::0 t--t n -I (/) ::: ta I 1--' ::: (" ( FU~D NO 919~ -JT DIST ~CRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/22/84 PAGE R£~0RT ~UMBER AF43 ( CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAMGE COUNTY WftRRA~T NO. VEN~OR C6%:!~ (:f%~'t (:60(.~~· ::lf c1e.~E: l:6Y07 l!f.9638 l'.'64?D9 f,f.q( 4 .J •J 6~fIt1 ff9F.42 OE:H'+:!· Cf".<f44 i:6C?f 45 r.6CE:IH: 065E:'l7 (16C,f.lfli £'69f:lf9 (,6<;6~(. :.f '?E: ~.1 (16~6!:2 r·1:.<.lf~3 %~·l.5't re.%5~ r.t9f.5f. ':6~6!57 rlC.650 i)f,C:fi!'O If. r; bl: r. iif ':'l1E 1 •:f.9(·6~ i.t.76fi.3 ~-=-qbE:lf •."-6'#H:~ f'69Ff':C- f6~Eaf~7 (:f,t)6F.3 :; b <"If (:.<J ;;f. ;~ 70 r: b C'l f 71 1~6%72 OE: C-.e 7! fi c~ ~b 7 '• )(;~0~. C£-.r;:67h 1)6C.E:77 ('!f967f! ADC LU~D~R CORF-. AGM fLECT~ONJcs. INC. ALrI INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY .A.~.u. AtVANcro CFFICE SEEVICES AGVt~CO CONSTRUCTO~St INC. ALL-STATE V[HJCLES, INC. ALLlfO SUFFLY CO. AMEPICA~ SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS ALALYTlCAL ~EASUN[M£~T~ THE ANC~CR PACKI~G CO. BLAKE P. ANDERSON /.QUA erN Crf{p. .AGl!ATIC CENTER ARCO GLASS & MI~RCR ARRCW-~Isco. INC. ~RTSCI, INC. ASSCCI~T(C CONCRETE PR~O., INC 4SSCCIAT£( LAeORATORJCS AUTG~A1£0 CfP.URRlNf: SUPPLY C:CiN C • eE.tirT IE (j( vco FIERLY '. ASSOCIATES, INC. CLUE DIA~C~D MATERIALS aoss ~ANUFACTURlNG co~ fiP.00~~ INSTRUMENTS lHE PURKE CO~PANY ~UllE~ EN~INEERI~G, INC. C & P ~ECC~DJTIONING CO. CK PUM~ A~D OE~ATERING CORP. CPT CALlfCRNIAt INC. CS CG~PANY JOHN C~ROLLO EUGI~EERS JCh~ CARCLLC ENGIN[ER~ CHfVF.ON U.S.A., INC. COAST FIRE fCUI~~ENT C01-IPUT£R liiAVE CONP. OCt< CC f'F ANY CONSOLIDATED ELECTFICtL f.JST. rDNSOLJOATED RE~ROOUCTJO~S CGNTINC~TAL CHEMICAL CC CCOFCR ENERGY SEFVICES CCSTA ~ESA AUTO PARTS• INC. F. E. fOULlEk CRANE RfNTAL COURTON ~ ASSOCIATFS [AL CO~SOLirATED YATEF CL~JMS PAID ~6/27/A't AMOUNT $2t278.68 S.H3.93 $339.14 iss.5a ·· :157.83 $157,876. (16 Sl~H0.7S $3.3 .13 $315.22 --· ii 69: 36 $265.U(! Sti 5. C.O s 2 5 ' 61 c; • f' l $H .oo $21. 91 ··-··-·i1~3·~·42···--·- s21.20 $1S3.03 $91)0.00 $222.04 i1,stis.no --··!H6.53 t550.0IJ $347.US 114CJ.45 $891).40 $615.75 slfs,197.28 s1t.aao.oo S2lftl65.0A s fq 1; i 5 Sltl'.!5.56 $~,as2.cn -··:i.162.1e $4,278.f>~ $~93. 77 Ull.f.4 $97.~l U t287.06 st.~97.~f $9,99J.50 t351.uo $51l9.36 $5. tlf1.5il $1 tCJ~S.•:•;J tZ!ltt. :'!"! DCSfPJPTION .LUMBER ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES OFF I CE SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PW-097, P2-25-2 VEHICLE LEASES VALVES LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS CWPCA CONFERENCE EXPENSES CHEMICAL COAGULANTS LAB SUPPLIES GLASS ELECTRICAL. SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES BUILDING MATERIALS LAB ANALYSIS WELDING SUPPLIES CRANE RIGGING CLASSES -ELECTRIC CART PARTS WORKERS' COMP. ADMINISTRATOR BUILDING MATERIALS .. SAFETY SUPPL I ES MAGNETIC FLOW HETER SHALL HARDWARE ·-ENGR. P2-2lf, VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROJ. PUMP REPAIRS CONTRACTOR PW-099 WORD PROCESSING SUPPLIES VALVES ENGR. Pl-20, J-15, P2-25, ENERGY TASK FORCE ENGR. ··n-26 GASOLINE, ENGINE OIL FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES BUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION CHLORINE ENGINE REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS CRANE RENTAL EIR #1,6,7 MASTER PLAN UPDATE WATER SOFTENER RENTAL, RESIN TANK EXCHANGE ... , I .J Ii i·! ! .. i: ; 'I , · . .i ~ ::: td I N I!:: F UNO ~10 q199 -JT DIST WORKING CAFJTAL .. _ --· . . . fl R (I CE S S I NG . DATE 6 / 2 2 / U 4 !' AG E REPORT NUMBER AP43 2 11 COUNTY SA~JTATION DISTRICTS OF OP.ANGE COUNTY ! I. ~JA~R/il'H NO. > G"> rn z t:=' > 1--t -I rn """'.'";It -~ ::t-1:: I--' C> J:> I I Cj 1--t (/) -I :::::0 ......... (I -I (/) ::: t.d 1. N i:;: • • 069679 f6%fl!! r;~sfel ((:C:f P2 l'~~f:.t-3 '16':16l!4 OE.'Jf.H• l~cr.Hlf. C6C:607 r!(.c: f.ttr. ncc:e:e9 f.6;.t:9t (•6C'(, G 1 Cf SC«;;? ~.6 ';( ':'.3 ( 6 q(.54 ~!f.9(:9~ %%56 f (:Gf. ~ 7 (.6~f5f• 1~63£:C)O ft=.S70C· Ltl}711l ~·c.t:-111e "',f-,C'.7f~. (b'37r.4 (!(.Cl7(l!:1 G6C?7[·f rtf,57)7 i!657(ll~ {!(,~ 70Cl {!f.G 7 lt 1161)711 rcq1~ (I(~ G 71 ~ 0£:':171'1 f.6~7H· f1£.CJ7 l!1 !'!f.0 71 7 %S7H t:f n11 S r.E5720 'j(,~ 721 f:6'?722 nf.S723 l.6972" ( vnmon DATA SOURC[S DECKER JNSTRUMf NT SUPFLY Co. DECO OELF·Hl SYSHHS, it~c. OEM-PAP SAL[S & SEPVJC[ OIES[L R GAS TURBINE PROCR£.~S OIP.ECT ~AffTY ·ce. . ·-. DUMis CIESEL INJECTION OUNM EDWARDS CO~P. lASlMAN, 0.-t •.. ELftT~lC ~ACHINERY Mf(. CO. ENVIROSPHE~E co. F4LCON tISPOSAL SERVitt FlSChER & PORTER CO. fJSt-!ER COP\TROLS FISHER SCl£NTJf fC co ... fLAl & VERTICAL CONCRETE FCOThllL (ARDEN fCUJPMENT VAL FC Th & SOt.s· CITY OF FCU~TAI~ VALLEY DONALD L. FOX r ASSOCIAlf~ THE FOXBORO tOMFANY . F~ANCE COPFRESFOR rROOUCT GW ~AJ~TE~~NCE1 INC. CANA~L LU~~ER CO. GEM-0'-LllE FLASTlfS CO~P. GENf PAL TELEPHO~E CO. GPAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. JEAN GPIGG HJLTI1 me. f'IR. l-iUfl CAP F.s. tfUGHF.S co., JNt:. r I TY Of tiUf\ TIN GT Cf\ eEAn1 HUNTIN6TC~ $UPF1Y 0 1-i'r' OF.OT E le ISCO COMPANY INrUSTPIAL ASPHALT ll\l?RA~ PAFEk IRVINE SWEf PING Sf PVICE I< AP L[f COMPANY KAS SAFETY PROOUCTS h~rN-KUT A~RASJVE r.r. KlLCO SALES & ENGINfERING CO. KELLY FIPE co. KENNEOY/J£~KS E~~JN[ERS ~IN& PEARJNG, l~C. CLA ms !'A.IP_ 06 !.~.?./~ L ______ . AMOUNT CESCl?IPTJON $60.~0 ENGINEERING PUBLICATION l279e&5 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $51823.93 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ·--i5:J7·.·ou· -.. -··· -t·tlNI «:oHPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES, PROGRAHHIUG $741.83 MANHOLE COVERS $15_0.'lO ... ENGIN~. REPAIRS il6~.47 SAFETY SUPPLIES l41U~2.4~ ENGINE PARTS ~qA2.73 PAINT SUPPLIES ... ······ -···-·---. -siio~·25 ---· ··-.--OFF f CE SUPPL I ES S277.61 ENGINE PARTS $4,072.0C EIR #5&6 MASTER PLAN UPDATE $ l 8 , it 6 2 • 7 ~ ---S LU D G E D I S P 0 SAL s2,220.3~ PIPE SUPPLIES 1406.00 REGULATOR PARTS ffo 4 :·9·4 ---. -·----·-··1i\o SUPPL i ES . . $130.00 CORE DRILLING 1148.12 TRUCK PARTS i2l~&cin;45 CONTRACTOR PW-109 $573.50 WATER USEAGE s2,1so.oo SAFETY CONSULTANT . ii , 3 q 2· :··a 3 -·---. ---. --EL E C T R i CAL . S UP PL I E S $457.~5 COMPRESSOR PARTS $112.~0 PUMP PARTS -j453.56 S~ALL HARDWARE $1~3.97 GLASS $6,739.lq TELEPHONE -1-&·H~'tP. -------ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $2~.50 EMPLOYEE MILEAGE H9E. dl SHALL HARDWARE $42.4t TRUCK PARTS $679.91 SAFETY SUPPLIES !11.27 WATER USEAGE $Cu 6 ~ ---.. --.. -. ... SMALL . HARDWARE $21938.32 LUBRICANTS $38.79 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $26.ff-BUILDi~G MATERIALS $11620.21 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES !2't9.u0 PLANT MAINTENANCE ·i433.q5. PAINT SUPPLIES $2~4.43 SAFETY SUPPLIES t.7Jq.qo TOOLS $62.7~ PIPE SUPPLIES 1367.39 PIPE SUPPLIES $18,379.25 ENGR. PW-061R-3 i~~7G~.42 BEARl~G SUPPLIES ( ( , .. l ! I; ! I ,. I ~ '. I' '· i I i I j I 1 I i ! I I H 11 .:.,. ~ I '1• :::: to I \J\I ::: J> G"> rn :;;:::: t:::I J> ---1 rn t:::: :it: 1--' (C::> (J> I I t::1 -(/) -I ::::c -n -I (/) :::: t:.d I \.N :::: " ( { FUND ~o 9]~9 -JT DIST ~CRKING CArJTAL FROCESSING PATE 6/22/~4 fAG[ Rf PORT NUMBER AF43 .3 W Alm AtJT NO• %9725 cc: 97?.l- n(,t'1727 !!6972'\ tl69729 i'6c;731) l'f.5711 "~5732 jf,973.3 %<;B'• f f.'i7:!5 ~~«?nb 11(-, c7 '!:7 r.c-n:.w (;6~739 C6q4:; ·164:'Hl ·Jn'311;? 1j(:q7t13 %~744 1Je. 97 4~. !l(; ':74t- llf.97H i::£: ~ 1tae %C:74C: Of97S::C !i6~7~1 (.6°7~C! ('.(! 9753 :'IE97~4 t:f-IJ75~; fit.975t •H'1757 H·975f' ('f,~ 7!:9 ·.: f '? 7 U. .,f. C::7f 1 ..;E.nc-2 C:E: ') 7Ci3 f!(-C:7f" Cl· ':1765 f';f.97H rf\C7(:J 6'nF-P. f.G 7f 5 f:C:17'j COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG[ COUNTY CLAJHS PAID n6/27/84 VENDOR l<LHJGER SHEL L.~.liir.S., INC. LA MOTTE CHEHJCAL PPOOUCTS LAURSf.~ CCLOR LAB LIG~TlNG DISTRIBUTORS, INC. LOC~L AGENCY FORMATION COMM LOWRY & ASSOCIATES . LYC~S J~T'L S[tURITY, l~C. H F L THLCK ROOY ~ACK TRUCKS, INr. KCCOY TRACTO~ &'[GUJPrENT MCl<ESSC~ C~t~IC~L CC. MCf'ASTEH-CAHfl Sllf-F'LY CO. MECHtNICAL OflIVf SYSTEMS ~ES~ CO~SCLIDATED ~iTEF ~INF SAFETY"~PPLiANCEs·co. fAOIJIT[K; INC. ~O~TGO~ERY LLEVATOR COMPANY MOOPE FROCUCTS CO. . GEO~GE ~ e. MOPGA~ co., INC. ~OTJCN INCUSTRIES, INC. Y.Yf.~S TIRE SUPFLY NALAP J~DLSTRlfS INC. NATEL & CC. ~ATJONAL LUM~En SUPPLY ~ELSON-CU~~, INC. CC C l DE ~ 1 Al C ti E ,_, J C AL C 0 F. F· • OCEAN SALT CO., INC. OLYMFIC C~(~ICAL CO. COUNTY OF ORrnGr CO. OF CP~~GE-AUOITOR CONTHOLF COU~TY S/.NIT/lTION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ~ACJrlc MCeILf OFFICES f'AC:JFIC HFETY rauIPMENT. co. f.·ACJFJC BELL PALL WESlE~~ COPP. PHCAL & LUO\.llG P/.T TEN COH. FE~H~ fURE P~OLUCTS, INC. ~ARCL~ FRI~ROS[ IC[ FUL SI.FEEDER ~AFFE~TY INTER~ATIONAL TPUC~S me PEGJ$HR mi:: Pt:l:ISHR HtF f.EHBLJC SlJF'FLY CO. CF CALIF., INC. RfANQf\D ELEClRCNIC F·ROL'llCTS AMOUNT ·t1,stiJ.:lo $212.91 $2lll.43 $313~97 !243.57 s.250.lla . $555.90 S666.0C $602.~8 "'ii,240.20 S5.~0 $~' 7 76. ·12 ·t24a.20 $57.51 ·S6.!JQ ·s.31f~9 o·- OESCP. JPT ION STEEL STOCK WELDING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES FILM. PROCESSING ELECTRICAL SUP~LIES ANNEXATION 0120 PROCESSING FEE BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS FREIGHT CHLORINE SHALL HARDWARE PIPE SUPPLHS WATER USEAGE SAFETY-SUPPLiES S4t672.95 CONTROL EQUIPMENT S328.4e. PLANT #2 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 1323. 80 .. . . REGULATOR PARTS . S6,7t4.00 CONTRACTOR PW-106 t-746.49 MOTOR ··-ii28.34 ..... ···--· ---TRUCK PARTS 154.57 ENGINE PARTS Sl,875.CU TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANT S289. f13 .. • SHALL HARDWARE !-367.'t3 $4t8~6.5b .... '$347.63 __ _ \2Dt538.68 $4,712.72 s.1s,900.·oo s1,soo.oc. S!~C.'52 .. ............ $ 9 8 3 • 6-5--- S.3~9.76 Slt030.36 no,526.-10 \l,2Hl.97 U17R~.81 .$3'1.00 01a.oo S258.43 $lt:Vt5.74 S·~i49.50 u,q.8~ :J.18~.f.? ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CAUSTIC SODA sAi.T CHLORINE LAB ANALYSIS COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND TRAILER RENTAL .SAFETY SLiPPLiES, FiRST AID SUPPi.iES TELEMETERING ENGINE PARTS CONTRACTOR PW-123, P2-26 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE PUMP PARTS TRUCK PARTS CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING PIPE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ( I .. r i'. j j I; t..j r j• i" l !. .j ."i , I ! ! I, . I !'• :: ttl I .J::" ::: fllfl.C1 l\C J> G') [!:] ..:::.. C1 J:::a __. -i rn 3 ::it: 1-J 0 )::> I I t::j __. (/) -i :;c t--t ("""') -i (/) ::: L:o I: ,..._ --::: • ~!t.Pli ANl ~O. (.f, 9 77 l l!f n7 72 [ifQ773 P6C:•7H 1i(: 5 7 7~ PE.5776 fl6Ci777 :rf 977~ (:6977~ ~fC:."/l'il IJ(: ':) "/e. J f'lf 43 782 •1€ «;;783 (If-t;7 f14 ~f57fl5 ,)f:97f•6 G6q7£!7 Q(.CI 7ff [lf,q7f1° GE'C:7r:t0 e6~79t f,f:C: 752 C6'"7S:'- iiE07C:-lf l!tt?75~ •)f: c. 7c,f; (.f; c ·1c; 7 l'f q7'3f1 (•6979q 16G!3CO itbG8 (' l i•c,c;r: u:? •H 9fil3 11c,~e n4 ~E'3l'~:5 r E-9~ Of 1l6': fl(, 7 ~:(,':'?lit! l'f: S8ll9 Gf:5ttlC 1J6SP.ll ~·£~5P.1~ l:f r; f 1.3 :!fl~l 614 r.fC<Plf:, J6~f' 1 f, 9199 -~T DIST UCRKIHE CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/22/A4 rAGL REFORT NUMBEfl AP43 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUHTY CLAI~S PAID ?6/27/84 VENDOR REYNOLD ~LLMl~UM SUPrLY ro. ROllBINS f. P"CHRS POCCO'S TRUCK W~ECKJ~G ROSE~OUl\j, INC. ~ANCCN INC. SAND DOLLAR PUSl~f~S FORMS S'UdP f.NA ocrGF SA~TA ~NA ELECT~JC ~OTO~S ~ARGE~T-WELCH SCJENllf IC_ CC. ~EAL P.LACI< SH.At-'RO(K SUf·PLY SMITH fIPl & SUF~LYt JNC SOLAR TUPPINES INl(RN~TJCNAL SO. COAST Al~ r.u~LITY HANAGEHENT DISTRICT SOUT~ COA~T OFFICE EGUJr~ENT sout~E~N CALJ~. tb1sbN·ca.· SO. CAL. GAS co. SOUTPERN COUNTIES OIL CO. SF~RKLETTS DRINKING ~ATrR STEfL f ~C~ANGE, INC. sun R Cf-IEI' CGRP ~UPERl~TEf\C[NT OF rccu~E~TS Hf[ ~UrFLIEPS SYHRGN • CA~Tlf SWINGLll\:[ co. TAHOR-CUf\N THOR TE~FCRtRY fiEPVJCES TR A Vfl RUFFS TRUC~ ~ AUTP SUPPLY, IHC. TUP.ESAlfS J.G. TVCKER ! snro., IMC. u.s. CCl\HIHR UN11£0 P~RCFL SfRVlCE UNITED STATfS EGLlIP~ENT CO., INC. VWP. SCIENTIFIC V4LL(Y CJTJE~ SUPPLY CO. VALV[ & STfEL SUf-PLY CO. VCTC ,..6CHC\E JOHN P.. wliPL[~ ~AU~fShA tNGINf S[RVJCfNTfR ~ES~AP MA~IN£ ElfClRONJCS ~EST COAST INSTALLATJONS wCSTCOAST FClCRt l~C. ~•f.STIMi~ICl!Sf. E'LF..CTf-\ JC CORP kllJH, Fll\E ~VERVILLE XEROX CORF. .. -·-. -. AMOUNT $lt422.2? 't5M .£,2 i5H·OO. S3R9.R3 $.6JO.OG f-lf53.~A !'.299.93 S2t426e'f O l28.t;4 ... 1145~75 Utlfi8e32 t.67:?.61. $97'f.23 OESCR JF·T JON STEEL STOCK PUHP PARTS TRUCK PARTS ENGINE PARTS CSDOC #7 MANHOLE REPAIRS OFFICE FORMS TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIRS LAB.SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES PAINT SUPPLIES, TOOLS PIPE SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS PERHIT FEES $5 t1If(,.0 0 $8f.7.4'J · ·· i9 i , 9e o. ,35·-.... ____ OFFl~E.FURNITURE :t 13, 70 'f. J b $18t812.Rlf !&55.50 s2,513.54 UtJ9~.13 i:50~.ou· ·· ·· ·· ··· $l ,tt';3.1H U"11f .OC J.lf a. a 1 $Cl(l. 9~ . S.36ile'llt $517.UO s 1ttl2q.9 0 $lt:lC•5.51 Slt24!l.2V $21:13.Clf 1·~ J. 75 t 2 ·~ R q 4 • l4£~ 12,26s.rrn Slt258.30 S.3t3'J7.2ii :J.5f'l l'. oc .1.~H.IJCl S2tl'ttl.99 $45Et.18 $427.50 u ~ 116 i. rn $] t9'llt.~5 $l .:52~ .l 3 s3,t45.55 POWER NATURAL GAS DIESEL FUEL BOTTLED WATER STEEL STOCK SOLVENTS .FEDERAL REGISTER RENEWAL EN~IHE PARTS/TOOLS/SHALL HARDWARE LAB EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS ELECTRIC CART PARTS TEMPORARY HELP AIR FARE TRUCK PARTS PIPE SUPPLIES HOSE STORAGE DRUM DELIVERY SERVICE COMPRESSOR PARTS LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES VALVES ENGINE REPAIRS ODOR CONSULTANT ENGINE PARTS LAB SUPPLIES FURNITURE REPAIRS PUMP PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY XEROX REPRODUCTION ( ( ( 'I ! : ' ~ : I. j' : i i I I i . : ! i i I ii . I : ! 11 ii >1 I I ·n ..~ i • e.a I U"l ~ ):> G'> rn 2 t:::I ):> .._... -I rn 3 :::i:t:: f-l C> J:> I I t::I .._... (/') -I :;;c .._... ("""') -I (/') :::: co I U1 :::: I ( ( FUND ~O 919° -JT CIST ~ORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/22/84 P~GE REFORT NUMeER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE C~UNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/27/B~ \J.ARRHT ~O. \IENIJCR ~·f. 9E'] 7 ZIP TEMPORA~Y PERSONNfl SUMMARY #1 OPER FUND #l ACO FUND #2 OPER FUND #2 F/R FUND #3 OPER FUND #3 F/R FUND #5 OPER FUND #6 ACO FUND U7 OPER FUND #7 ACO FUND #11 OPER FUND #13 ACO FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #5&6 ACO FUND #6&7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF TOTAL CLAIMS PAID ~6/27/84 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COMP. INSURANCE FUND. JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIHS PAID 06/27/8lt AMOUNT S13i.52 fa 1H ·, 32 9 ~·~6 ================= ' AMOUNT $ ).68 655.05 180.05 474.32 1 Q •. ~54 .• 75 ......... ·-· .. 37. 55 3,041.03 655.05 2,031.si 6H.90 696.74 ............... _ ... a12:H ...... --· 2,396.40 4,072.00 . 22. 87 335,417.28 375.3lt6.13 · ·· :r,250.06 61,907.76 $801,329.56 --------•• p •• --..... - . ll[SCRIPTJON TEMPORARY HELP ( ') I :.1 : I ·:: t. I I '-' RESOLtrrION NO. 84-104-1 AUTHORIZING FILING FOR FEDERAL AND STATE GRANTS - 1984-85 JOINT WORKS rMPROVEMENTS AND ADDITIONS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. l OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 1251 ET SEQ. , AND STATE GRANT UNDER CLEAN WATER BOND LAW OF 1970 AND/OR 1974, ON BEHALF OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * , t The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, (33 u.s.c., 1251 et seq.) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. The State Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 and/or 1974 authorizes the State Water Resources Control Board to enter into contracts with public agencies for State grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 3. County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County is _a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5, of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local sewering agencies, and has joined with other County Sanitation Districts; namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, in constructing, operating and maintaining joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated July 1, 1970, as amended, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 4. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Ownership, Operation "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" . .• i, and Construction Agreement, County ~anitation District No. 1 of Orange County acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California, for the purpose of constructing and operating said joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities. Section s. By means of this resolution and of the resolutions set forth below by number, the following County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, have authorized the filing of applications for grants under said Act of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Law and have authorized County Sanitation District No. 1 to file said application in their behalf. DISTRICT NO. RESOLUTION NO. 2 84-105-2 3 84-106-3 5 84-107-5 6 84-108-6 7 84-109-7 11 84-110-11 Section 6. J. Wayne Sylvester, Gener~! Manager, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file for and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, Application for a Federal Grant for Sewage Treatment Works under 33 u.s.c., 1251 et seq., and a State Grant for Clean Water under the Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 and/or 1974, for a joint project generally described as follows: 1984-85 Joint Works Improvements and Additions Section 7. District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, hereby agrees and further does "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if a Federal grant for its project is made pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as #. amended, (33 u.s.c., 1251 et seq.) it will pay the remaining cost of the approved ~ project; it will provide proper and efficient operation and maintenance of the approved project after completion of construction thereof; it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (F.L. 88-352) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto and state that the Assurance of Compliance with such regulation attached to the application for Federal grant applies to this project; and it will comply with requirements of Executive Order 11246 pertaining to equal employment opportunity in Federally-assisted construction contracts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #ll(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "C-3" 1 \ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 1 of 2 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO • __ N/_A ________ _ c.o. NO. __ o_n_e_(l_)_~---~-- CONTRACT-OR~ . Peter C. David Co.· ·oA~E _____ Ju_n_e_s~, _1_9_84 _____ _ JOB: FILTRATE LINE TO DISTRIBUTION BOX, PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-102 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (~~ $~_3_,_11_a~.o_o ______ ~ ., Jn accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item A The Contractor was delayed due to operational probiems beyond his control. Extra costs incurred are in accordance with Section 10-4 of the General Provisions for the lump sum of ••• Item B During the construction of the wall forms for ·the valve pit at the existing filtrate line, portions of the existing dewatering ·building tunnel footing were found to interfere. The Contractor was instructed to remove the interfering portion of the footing $690.00 '..,I to permit the erection of the wall forms for the lump sum of ••• $195.00 ·....,_; Item C Asphalt paving adjacent to the secondary tlarifier distribution box was found to be 1 1 -0" .thick and required the use of a ram hoe to break it up. For the lump sum of ••• Item D The Contractor was requested to install 360 feet of 1-1/2 inch polyurethane.piping for use as a polymer.feed line to the secondary clarifier distribution box •. Work is in accordance with Section 10-4 of the General .Provisions, fo"r the lump sum of Item E During the excavation for the filtrate line the Contractor encountered a concrefe encased electrical duct not shown on the plans. Costs to protect the electrical duct are in accordance with the ·provisions set ·forth in Section 10-4 $322.00 $2,136.00 of the General Prov~sions and are allowed in the amount of • $375.00 TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $3,718.00 TIME EXTENSION GRANTED THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(B)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY~ CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 2 of 2·. CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A ~-0-ne __ (l_)----~~~ C.Q. NO·---------~~- CONTRACTOR: Peter C. David Co. DA TE June 5 ' 1 984 ----------------. . JOB: FILTRATE LINE TO ·DISTRIBUTION BOX, PLANT NO. 1 ~JOB NO. PW-102 -The additional work contained in this change order can be performed incidental -to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time ·Extension this Change Order Total Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: July 11, 1984 January 11, 1984 28 Calendar Days February 7, 1984 0 Calendar Days 0 Calendar Days No Change No Change Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change {ADD) (BE»~E!") Amended Contract Price Approved: $ 33,700.00 $ 0.00 $ 3 '718. 00 $ 37,418.00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By __ ~~-------~~~~~--De pu ty Chief Engineer Contractor "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(B)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" ,, RESOLUTION NO. 84-111 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-102 AS C)MPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC'rS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING FILTRATE LINE TO DISTRIBUTION BOX, JOB NO. PW-102, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Peter C. David Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for construction of Filtrate Line to Distribution Box, Job No. PW-102, on February 7, 1984, and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That construction of Filtrate Line to Distribution Box, Job No. PW-102, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated January 11, 1984, and, Section 4. That ~e Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section S. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Peter C. David Company, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of construction of Filtrate Line to Distribution Box, Job No. PW-102, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "E" AGENDA ITEM #ll(s)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "E" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY~ CALIFORNIA 92708 Page 1 of ·2 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO·. N/A ----------~-c. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR:. George & B. Morgan Company DAl'E June 21, 1984 --~---------~---- JOB: REPLACE "C 11 HEADWORKS CONVEYOR AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. Pl~-106 Amount of this Change Order (ADD) {BEBM&f) $ 1, 407. 00 Jn accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contr~ct and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item A During the d·emolition of the pipe tunnel at the Headworks 11 C11 conveyor, the Contractor was required. to isolate and remove . an air line that was not shown on the Plans. Costs for the extra work are in accord with Section 10-4 of the General Provisions and are in the amount of ••• Item B A 6-inch PVC catch basin drain line was connected to the belt conveyor catch basin· th.at was scheduled for demolition. As this 6-inch line was not shown to exist on the plans, its reconne~tion to the new catch basin was completed at addi- tional costs in the amount of Item C After the Contractor had set his forms for the slab on grade located to the north of the conveyor, it was determined that.a conflict in finish elevations existed between ·the P2-27 Contract·and· the PW-106 Contract. Th~ Contractor was required to change the elevations of his subgrade, reinforcing steel and forms to eliminate the conflict. Cost to perform this extra work is in accordance with Section 10-4 of the General Provisions and in the amount of ••• Item D The performance of the extra work included in this change order disrupted the Contractor 1 s schedule and delayed· the canpletion of the project. The Contractor is granted a non-compensable time extension of 41 calendar days to canplete the project. TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(c)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS $550.00 $250.00 $607. 00 41 Calendar Days $1,407.00 41 Calendar Days "F-1" 1, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEYJ CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. H/A Page 2 of 2 ----------c. 0. NO. One ( 1) CONTRACTOR: George & B. Morgan Canpany DA TE June 21 , 1984 JOB: REPLACE 11 C11 HEADWORKS CONVEYOR AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB .NO. P\'l-106 . The additional work ·contained in this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract plus the 41 days time extension granted hereby. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension other than the 41 days approved h~rein is required for this change order and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs or expenses have been or wi 11 be incurred by. Contractor. -..__I. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this ehange Order . Total_ Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Completion Date Board authorization date: July 11, 1984 Septemb_er 22, 1983 120 Calendar Days January 19, 1984 41 Calendar Days 41 Calendar Days 161 Calendar Days February 29, 1984 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) (»!:%)~ Amended Contract Price Approved: $ 7.6,450.00 $ 0.00 $ 1,407.00 $ 77,857.00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California ...... By ______ ~---~~~-~~ Deputy Chief Engineer ...,,-' ------------~------Contractor "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(c)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-112 ACCEPTING JOB NO. PW-106 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRicrs NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT TO REPLACE "C" HEADWORKS CONVEYOR AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. PW-106, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, George & B. Morgan Company, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract to Replace "C" Headworks Conveyor at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-106, on February 29, 1984, and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Job No. PW-106, Replace "C" Headworks Conveyor at Plant No. 2, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated September 22, 1983, and, Section 4. That the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with George & B. Morgan Company, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of contract to Replace "C Headworks Conveyor at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-106, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "G" AGENDA ITEM #ll(c)(2) -ALL DISTRICTS "G" 1, RESOLUTION NO. 84-113 AWARDING JOB NO. PW-083 (REBID) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF OJUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR AUTO SHOP HOIST AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PW-083 (REBID) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RFSOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to G.E. Jepson Div./Chas. E. Thomas Co. for construction of Auto Shop Hoist at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-083 (Rebid), and bid. tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are.hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for construction of Auto Shop Hoist at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-083 (Rebid), be awarded to-G.E. Jepson .Div./Chas. ·E. Thomas Co., in the total amount of $15,913.00 in accordance with the 'terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "H" AGENDA ITEM #ll(E) -ALL DISTRICTS "H" II I II NO ADDENDUM June 26, 1984 ll:OOA.M. BID TABULATION SHEET JOB NO. PW-083 (REBID) PROJECT TITLE AUTO SHOP HOIST AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Install an 18 ton truck hoist in Districts Auto Shop ENGINEER. s ESTIMATE _$_2_5 ... , o_o_o ______ _ BUDGET AMOUNT $ 50,000 ----------------- REMARKS -------------------------------------------------------------- ========================================================================~======= CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID ==================~=====================================================o======= 1. G. E. Jepson Div./Chas. E. Thomas Co. Paramount, CA $ lS,913.00 2. Del's Service, Inc. Los Angeles, CA $ 21,701.80 3. $ 4. $ I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to G. E. Jepson Company of Paramount, California, in the bid amount of $15,913.00 as the lowest and best bid. Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer AGENDA ITEM #ll(E) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II June 27, 1984 62 'ID: Bill Butler MEMORANDUM SUBJECI': Landscape Maintenance, Specification No. M-015 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 8127 1084" ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Sealed bids were opened on June 26, 1984, for landscape maintenance at Plants 1, 2 and Seal Beach Pump Station. The maintenance includes rrowing, weeding, edging, trinming and sweeping or raking of lawns, flCMer beds and walks. The service will be performed once a week every seven days at Plants 1 and 2, and biweekly at Seal Beach Pump Station, weather permitting. The tabulation of bids is listed on the attached sheet. The contract will be for one year effective August 1, 1984, with provisions for a one-year extension. The lowest total bid anount is a tie between Tak Takamine Landscape and Irvine Landscape Canpany. Tak Takamine was awarded the contract in July of 1982, and Irvine Landscape, the current contractor, was awarded the contract in July of 1983. Tak Takarnine perfonnance was vecy good while he had the contract, but during the past year, the Districts have experienced sorre areas of poor perfor- mance from Irvine landscape Co. Ted Hoffman' Chief of Procurerrent & Property Concur, William N. Clarke Superintendent TH/re Attachment "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(F) -ALL DISTRICTS II J-1" :::: '-I N ::: J;:> G"> rn z t::::j J> t--4 --i rn :::; :ft: I-' I-' ~ .,, .._,, J> I I t::::j / 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 • Company Tak Takamine Landscape and Maintenance/Anaheim Irvine Industrial Landscape/Santa Ana National Landscape, Inc. La Habra South Coast Landscape Laguna Niguel S.C. Yamamoto, Inc. Fullerton u; * Weekly --i **Biweekly :::0 t--4 Cl --i (/) :::: '-I N ::: ( TABULATION OF BIDS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATION NO. M-015 *Plant 1 *Plant 2 Seal· Beach **Pump Station $270, I $160 $80 260 190 40 302 230 135 300 275 200 1,250 940 320 (, Year Total $24,440 24,440 31,174 35,100 122,220 ( "K" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS July 2, 1984 63 of 0 RANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127 MEMORANDUM 10844 ELLIS AVENUE TO: Bill Butler FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 SUBJECT: Specification No. A-120, Twelve Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers Specification No. A-121, Three Four-Wheel Electric Personnel Carriers Sealed bids were opened June 27, 1984, for furnishing and delivering cargo and personnel carriers. The tabulation of bids is as follows: I. Bid Specification A-120 (12) Cargo Carriers Cabs for two Instrument Dept Carriers Less Trade-In Taylor-Dunn Mfg. Co. Anaheim $37,401.00 1,930.00 $39,331.00 No Bid Net-Cargo Carriers $39,331.00 II. A-121 (3) Personnel Carriers $ 9,384.75 McKinley Equipment Irvine $40,020.00 1,720.00 $41,740.00 500.00 $41,240.00 $ 9,480.00 Crown Lift Trucks City of Industry $52,544.40 1,244.00 $53,788.40 500.00 $53,288.40 No Bid It is recommended that Items I and II, respectively, be awarded to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, the low bidder, in the amounts shown above plus sales tax. Inasmuch as the low bidder did not offer an amount for the trade-in of an old cart, this unit will be advertised for sale at a future equipment sale in accordance with the purchasing resolution. The requested carts are listed in the capital equipment budgets for fiscal years 1983-84 and 1984-85. Sufficient funds have been budgeted for their purchase. Taylor-Dunn has extended a payment discount of 1% to the Districts in their bid proposal if approved invoices are paid within ten days after receipt. It is our intention to ta e advantage of this savings. J Property William N. Clarke Superintendent AGENDA ITEMS NOS. ll(G)&(H) -ALL DISTRICTS "K" "L-1" June 25, 1984 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Standard Sewage Samplers COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 0 RANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O BOX8127 10844 ELLIS AVEt~UE FOUNlAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708 , (714)540-2910 (714)962-2411 The Districts are required to sample both influent as well as effluent wastewater streams for analytical and reporting purposes. Considerable study and research has been conducted with on-going testing to determine what type of sampler would best meet our needs. It has been determined by field trials that a sampler utilizing a peristaltic-type pump manufac- tured by Randolph Austin Co. (Model 880) best serves this application because of the low flow rates needed and minimal moving parts. Other pumps have been tested and found to be unsatisfactory. In September 1981, a purchase order was issued to Sigmamotor, Inc. of Irvine to manufacture one prototype standardized sampler in accordance with Districts' specification No. E-120 prepared by Engineering Science, consult- ing engineers,for a total of $16,345. A subsequent change order brought the total cost to $17 ,995. The sampler was received in June 1982. After a testing period it was determined that the prototype sampler did, in fact, meet all our requirements. Thus, in August 1983, the Districts advertised for bids to purchase six standardized samplers in accordance with specifica- tion No. E-133. The engineer's estimate was $102,000 ($17,000 each) for the six samplers. Only one contractor bid, American Sigma, Inc. , Middle- port, N.Y. in the amount of $164,080 ($27,346.67 each). Due to the high costs, we recommended that the Boards reject all bids and refer the matter '\:w) back to staff for evaluation of the lower cost options for the samplers. The staff has concluded that we can build and install the samplers under force account for a much lower price than the bid we received. A new proto- type standard sampler was fabricated and installed by Districts' forces at a cost of · less than $8, 000 and has successIµlly met the needs as described above. · Recently, in conjunction with the proposed 30l(h)/NPDES Permit, the EPA has mandated that we sample both influent and effluent streams and separate the recycle stream volumes. Although we have some existing samplers which are in use, our Maintenance, Operations and the Laboi:atory Departments have jointly determined that we need 16 new samplers to fully comply with our own internal operating needs as well as EPA' s requirements. Using the current prototype price, the estimate to construct and install this equipment with our forces is $6,.500 each for 16 samplers for a total of $104, 000. This price includes labor, materials and overhead to fabricate and install the samplers. Once .the samplers are installed it will be necessary to construct a housing over each one at an estimated cost of $6,600 each for a total of $92,400 for 14 samplers (two (2) will be inven- toried as spare samplers to replace units when down for repairs). The total estimated cost to fabricate, install and cover is $196,400. It is recommended at this time that authority be requested of the Boards to proceed with the fabrication and installation of 16 standard samplers V AGENDA ITEM #ll(J)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" "L-2" . ' Page 2 Subject: Standard Sewage Samplers in accordance with job plan No. 51888-0-00 for a maximum amount of $196,400 and that the General Manager be authorized to negotiate and issue a purchase order contract to the Randolph Austin Co. for the purchase of 16 each of the proprietary Model 880 peristaltic pumps for said samplers, for a total amount not to exceed $28,720 plus freight and applicable sales taxes. /pr AGENDA ITEM #llCJ)(l) -ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-114 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-146 APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE DISTRICTS TO ACT AS AGENTS IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 1 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 75-146, APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE DISTRICTS TO ACT AS AGENTS ON THEIR BEHALF IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF THE WEST ORANGE COUNTY JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AND RESCINDING ALL OTHER RESOLUTIONS AMENDING SAID RESOLUTION NO. 75-146 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Exhibit "A" to Resolution No. 75-146 is hereby amended to ·read as follows: "M" "EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 75-146 J. Wayne Sylvester William H. Butler Blake P. Anderson Gary Streed Danny Dillon William Aldridge Judy Lee Carol Cox Shelia Ivins Richard Von Langen James Benzie James Wybenga" Section 2. That this resolution become effective July 11, 1984. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. AGENDA ITEM #ll(K) -ALL DISTRICTS "M" RESOLUTION NO. 84-122-2 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 50 -CASADA ANNEXATION) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 50 -CASADA ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 2 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 2 by Dale Casada, the owner of said property to be annexed, by means of Resolution·No. 81-107-2, filed with said Commission by the District; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 50 -Casada Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the terr~tory hereinbefdre referred to is uninhabited; and, Section s. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation acreage fees in the "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(M) -DISTRICT 2 "N-1" amount of $888.80 has been satisfied; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 2 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(M) -DISTRICT 2 "N-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-123-2 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MODIFICATIONS TO CARBON CANYON DAM PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 2-24 * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written reconunendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Subgrade Construction Corporation for Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, be awarded to Subgrade Construction Corporation in the 0total amount of $138,630.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices :contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. II O" AGENDA ITEM #ll(N)(2) -DISTRICT 2 "O" 1 ADDENDUM June 26, 1984 ll:OOA.M. BID TABULATION S H E E T CONTRACT NO. 2-24 pBOJECT TITLE MODIFICATIONS TO CARBON CANYON PUMP STATION pBQJECT DESCRIPTION Furnish all material, labor and equipment including earthwork ~RCP wet well and retaining walls, miscellaneous metal, electrical, and fittings, fencing, and landscaping. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 200,000 ---~......:...~~------------- BUDGET AMOUNT $_25_0 __ ,_o_o_o ____ _ REMARKS~--------------------------------~~~----------------------------~ =====~========================================================================== CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID ================================================================================ 1. Subgrade Construction Corp. $ 138,630.80 Orange, CA 2. Floyd-Kordick, J.V. $ 169,183.69* Redlands , CA 3. Caliagua, Inc. $ 174,574.00 Orange, CA 4. Vida Samarzich Inc. $ 185,152.40 Arcadia, CA 5. Baker Construction $ 186,191.00 Murrieta, CA 6. Advanco Constructors, Inc. $ 193,449.00 Upland, CA 7. Mac-Well Company $ 194,464.52 Anaheim, CA 8. Kershaw Construction $ 203,486.00 Ontario, CA * Error in addition/multiplication I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Subgrade Construction Corp. of Orange, California, in the bid amount of 138,630.80 as the lowest and best bid. ~ ~ii Deputy Chief Engineer "P" AGENDA ITEM #ll(N)(2) -DISTRICT 2 "P" ~ "Q" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONES: AREA CCOE 714 540·2910 962·2411 P. a. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 June 20, 1984 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering Services in Connection with Taft Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-6-2 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Berryman & Stephenson, Inc. in conjunction with the preparation of plans and specifications for the Taft Interceptor Sewer, including City of Orange street improvements, between the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer and Glassell Street in the City of Orange, Contract No. 2-6-2. Engineering Services (Direct Labor plus Overhead@ 140%), not to exceed Direct·Expenses, not to exceed Snils Investigation, not to exceed Fixed Profit: Total Contract, not to exceed $21,275 450 1, 725 3,500 $26,950 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/ Henry w. Wedaa Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman Selection Committee /s/ Don E. Smith Don E. Smith, Director County Sanitation District No. 2, Councilman, City of Orange /s/ Don Roth Don Roth, Chairman pro tern Selection Committee Isl Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes, Deputy Chief Engineer Selection Committee AGENDA ITEM #ll(o)(l) -DISTRICT 2 "Q" RESOLUTION NO. 84-124-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BERRYMAN & STEPHENSON, INC. FOR DESIGN OF THE TAFT INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-6-2, AND CITY OF ORANGE AHFP STREET IMPROVEMENTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BERRYMAN & STEPHENSON, INC. FOR DESIGN OF THE TAFT INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-6-2, AND CITY OF ORANGE AHFP STREET IMPROVEMENTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing proce- dures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Berryman & Stephenson, Inc. for design of the Taft Interceptor' Sewer, Contract No. 2-6-2, and City of Orange AHFP street improvements in Taft Avenue between the Santa Ana River and Glassell Street; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has _certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors o~ County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated ~~~~~~~~~-by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Berryman & Stephenson, Inc. for design of the Taft Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-6-2, and City of Orange AHFP street improvements in Taft Avenue between the Santa Ana River and Glassell Street, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: R-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(o)(2) -DISTRICT 2 "R-1" Direct Labor {plus Overhead at 140%), not to exceed ••••••••••••••••••••••••• $ 21,275 Direct Expenses, not to exceed......................... 450 Soils Investigation, not to exceed ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1,725 Fixed Profit •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3,500 TOTAL, not to exceed ••••••••••••••• $ 26,950 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(o)(2) -DISTRICT 2 "R-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-127-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DIS TRI CT (ANNEXATION NO. 94 -OOODY ANNEXATION) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRicr NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRicr (ANNEXATION NO. 94 -MOODY ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOF.S HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 7 by Fred Bonar, David Greenwald, Henry Moody and Herbert Stroschein, the owners of said property to be annexed, by means of :Resolution No. 81-155-7, filed with said Commission by the District; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 94 -Moody Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation acreage fees in the "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(p) -DISTRICT 7 "S-1" amount of $2,753.96 has been satisfied; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(p) -DISTRICT 7 "S-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-128-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 105 -O:>RMIER ANNEXATION) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIREcrORS OF aJUNTY SANITATION DISTRicr NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 105 -CORMIER ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRicr NO. 7) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said \.J territory to County Sanitation District No. 7 by Leonard L. Cormier, III, the owner of said property to be annexed, by means of Resolution No. 81-147-7, filed with said Commission by the District; and,· Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 105 -Cormier Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described ~n Exhibit."A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the terr~tory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section S. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation acreage fees in the "T-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(Q) -DISTRICT 7· "T -1" amount of $1,725.69 has been satisfied; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "T-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(Q) -DISTRICT 7 "T-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-129-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 106 -O'TOOLE ANNEXATION) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI' NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRicr (ANNEXATION NO. 106 -O'TOOLE ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, OOF..S HEREBY RFSOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner; and, Section 2. That pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said ~ -.territory to County Sanitation District No. 7 by Mr. and Mrs. Francis O'Toole, the owners of said property to be annexed, by means of Resolution No. 81-192-7, filed .with said Commission by the District; and, Section 3. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 106 -O'Toole Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the terr~tory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section s. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 6. That provision for payment of annexation acreage fees in the "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(R) -DISTRICT 7 "U-1" amount of $1,276.73 has been satisfied; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h) (1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and Section 8. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(R) -DISTRICT 7 "U-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-130-7 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 7-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE \UN KARMAN TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-8 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineer, has completed preparation of the plans and specifications for construction of the VOn Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, OOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the project for construction of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, is hereby approved. Said project was formerly titled Airport Relief Trunk Sewer and was included in the Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities to Serve District No. 1, the Northern Half of District No. 6 and District No. 7 approved by the Boards of Directors on April 11, 1984. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on May 30, 1984, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines . Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineer, for construction of the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #ll(r) -DISTRICT 7 "V-1'1 Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date '.-' and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary and the District's Deputy Chief Engineer be .authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "V-2" AGENDA ITEM #ll(r) -DISTRICT 7 "V-2" RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIREcrORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRicr NO._ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as propoped by the Initiative Measure approved by the people at the special statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise specifically provided for in said Article7 and, WHEREAS, the State Legislature added Division 9 (commencing with Section 7900) to Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California to implement Article XIII B of the California Constitution1 and, WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at a regularly-scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting and that fifteen .(15) days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit shall be available to the public1 and, WHEREAS, Section 7902 (a) of the Government Code sets forth the method for determining the appropriations limit for each local jurisdiction for the ---fiscal year7 and, "W-1" AGENDA ITEM #17 -ALL DISTRICTS "W-1" WHEREAS, THE Board of Directors wish to establish the appropriations limit for fiscal year for the District. ---- \._,/ NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1: That it is hereby found and determined that the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for County Sanitation District No._ of Orange County, California, for fiscal year , was available to the public in the Finance Department of said District at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date. Section 2: That the appropriations limit for fiscal year for ---- County Sanitation District No. __ of Orange County, California, as established in accordance with Section 7902(a) of the California Government Code is $ ----- which sum is within the maximum authorized spending limitation for fiscal year---- Section 3: The determination of the appropriation limit is based upon the best and most complete information available at this time. The District · reserves the right to review and re-establish a new and different limit in the event that it subsequently determines that a modification of the limitation amount is appropriate. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held ----------- "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #17 -ALL DISTRICTS "W-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-125-5 DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 1984-85 PROPERTY TAX BILLS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE 1984-85 PROPERTY TAX BILLS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 513, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 Amending Ordinance No. 511 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; and, WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such charges, as adopted by District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, its general taxes. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Ora~ge County, California. OOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer service charges as established by Ordinance No. 513 on the 1984-85 property tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, the general taxes and the property tax bills for each year thereafter for so long as the rates do not increase and this resolution remains in effect; and, Section 2. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed or ~ "X-1" AGENDA ITEM #27Cc) -DISTRJCT 5 "X-1" until such time as the rate of sewer charges as established by Ordinance No. 513 i...,_; is increased; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order set forth in Section 1 herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "X-2" AGENDA ITEM #27(c) -·DISTRICT 5 "X-2" RESOLUTION NO. 84-126-6 DIRECTING COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON 1984-85 PROPERTY TAX BILLS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO INCLUDE SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE 1984-85 PROPERTY TAX BILLS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 607 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; and, WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5473 provides that such charges, as adopted by District Ordinances, may be collected on the County tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, its general taxes. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California. DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE ~ ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, the County Auditor-Controller is hereby ordered and directed to include sewer service charges as established by Ordinance No. 607 on the 1984-85 property tax bills in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separate from, the general taxes and the property tax bills for each year thereafter for so long as the rates do not increase and this resolution remains in effect; and, Section 2. That pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, this resolution shall remain in full force and effect until amended or repealed or until such time as the rate of sewer charges as established by Ordinance No. 607 \.._} "Y-1" AGENDA ITEM #30(c) -DISTRICT 6 "Y-1" is increased; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute any necessary documents or agreements to effect the order set forth in Section 1 herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. "Y-2" AGENDA ITEM #30(c) -DISTRICT 6 "Y-2" "Z-1" ORDINANCE NO. 206 AN ORDINANCE OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SEPARATE SERVICE AREA ZONES AND ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF CONNECTION CHARGES AND SEWER USE CHARGES FOR THE USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES BY PROPERTIES LOCATED OUTSIDE THE PRESENT DISTRICT BOUNDARIES WHEREAS, there exists considerable real property located outside the District boundaries, but which has a natural drainage into District No. 2 and District No. 7; and, WHEREAS, this District and District No. 7 have presently filed a petition {known as Reorganization No. 65) with the County of Orange Local Agency Formation Commission to form a new County Sanitation District No. 13, and to provide for art exchange of certain parcels of real property between Districts Nos. 2, 7 and 13; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California are organized to operate pursuant to a Joint Administrative Organization Agreement, which provides for the joint ownership of sewage treatment works, ocean outfall and related facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Joint Administrative Organization has approved of District No. 13 joining as a member agency upon the approval of the formation of said District, provided that District No. 13 is able to meet certain financial obligations, including the purchase of a pro rata share of the existing and future capital facilities, and to pay its annual share of the costs of operation and maintenance of the joint facilities; and, WHEREAS, the District No. 2 Board of Directors has received ~ 1 AGENDA ITEM #35 -DISTRICT 2 "Z-1" "Z-2" an engineering report on the subject of all applicable costs for the formation of District No. 13; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that certain properties that will eventually be located in District No. 13 will be requesting sewer service prior to formation, which service can be provided by District No., 2; and, WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 5471 authorizes a County Sanitation District to establish charges for service and facilities furnished by it to properties located within or without its territorial limits. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of .County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1: District agrees that it shall provide or cause to be provided by other Sanitation Districts who are m·embers of the Joint Administrative Organization, sewer service to all that certain territory to be included in County Sanitation District No. 13 upon its formation, which is particularly legally described in the pending petition for formation with the County of Orange, and the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission and as shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The territory ultimately to be located outside the Districts Nos. 2 and 7 boundaries and within new District No. 13, as described in Section 1 is divided into three (3) separate zones for purposes of regulation of sewage facility use. Said zones are established as Zones A, B and c, and the boundaries of each are set forth on Exhibit "A" of this Ordinance. 2 AGENDA ITEM #35 -.DISTRICT 2 "Z-2" "Z-3" Sectidn 1: Ordinance No. 205 of county Sanitation District No. 2, and any amendments thereto, hereinafter enacted, shall, ~ except for Section 702 thereof, be applicable to all territory as described in Section 1. Section ,!: Connection Fees. Be.fore any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District, or its , agent, the charges specified as follows: Zon·e A: (1) Connection charge for new construction: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $220.00 per dwelling unit. (2) Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the connection charge shall be $220.00 per dwelling unit. (3) Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and mo- tels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $45.00 per 1,000 square fees of floor aea contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $220.00. (4) Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (1) and (3) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or V- 3 AGENDA ITEM #35 -DISTRICT 2 "Z-3" "Z-4" destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. (5) Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $220.00 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $45.00 pr 1,000 square feet of add~tional floor area contained within such new construction, prov~ded such new construction shall contain additional fixture units. Zone 1}: (1) Connection charge for new construction: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $1,250.00 per dwelling unit. (2) Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the connection charge shall be $1,250.00 per dwelling unit. (3) Connection charge for.new construction and existing structures, other than.dwelling buildings: For all other· new construction, including but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $250.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such 4 AGENDA ITEM #35 -DISTRICT 2 "Z-4" "Z-5" construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,250.00. (4) Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (1) and (3).above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. (5) Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase ~he occupancy of dwelling buildins or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall b $1,250.00 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $250.00 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional fixture units. Zone .C.: (1) Connection charge for new construction: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the connection charge shall be $1,500.00 per dwelling unit. 5 AGENDA ITEM #35 -DISTRICT 2 "Z-5" "Z-6" (2) Connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the connection charge shall be $1,500.00 per dwelling unit. (3) Connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the connection charge shall be $300.00 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500.00. (4) Connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (1) and (3) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the connection charges. (5) Connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structurs where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the connection charge shall be $1,500.00 for each dwelling unit added or created, and in the case of new 6 AGENDA ITEM #35 -DISTRICT 2 "Z-6" "Z-7" construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $200.00 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional fixture units. { 6) In addition to the charges set forth in Paragraphs {l) through (5) inclusive, above, each applicant for a connection permit for property located in Zone A shall pay to District or its agent, an initial service fee in an amount equal to the annexation acreage fee that was in effect by the applicable District on the date application for annexation was made by the property owner or its representative. Section 2: Annual Sanitary Sewer ~ Charge. A. Each parcel of real property located within the area described in Section 1 above, which is improved with struc- tures designed for residential, commercial or industrial use and ~ connected to the District's system, shall pay a sanitary sewer use charge in accordance with the schedule set forth on Table A of this Ordinance. B. The sanitary sewer use charge shall be for the period commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance and June 30, 1985. Section ~: The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. 7 AGENDA ITEM #35 -DISTRICT 2 "Z-7 11 v PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors this day of , 1984. Chairman ATTEST: Secretary { 6.) 8 "Z~8" AGENDA ITEM #35-DISTRICT 2 "Z-8" "Z-9" TABLE A SANITARY SEWER USE FEES For those properties presently situated within the boundaries of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 7, which will be included in County Sanitation District No. 13 upon formation and for which the Districts receive no ad valorem property tax: $70.00 per year For those properties not presently situated within the boundaries of any County Sanitation District of Orange County, Calif ronia, whLch will be included in County Sanitation District No. 13 upon formation and for which the Districts receive no ad valorem property tax: $140.00 per year 9 AGENDA ITEM #35 -DISTRICT 2 "Z-9" ... ,. • 6/13/84 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Fred A. Harper, General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, Assistant General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, William H. Butler, Tom Dawes, Bill Clarke, Blake Anderson, Hilary Baker, Penny Kyle, Ray Young, Richard von Langen, Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Harvey Hunt, Milo Keith, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, Darrel Cohoon, Mr. and Mrs. Donald Holt, Jr. * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICTS 2, 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpts re Board Appointments That the minute excerpts from the following cities re election of mayors* and appointment of alternate Directors, be, and are hereby, received and ordered f iled1 and that the following representatives be seated as members of the Boards: City District (s) Active Director Alternate Director Fountain Valley 2 & 3 James Neal Marvin P. Adler* Fullerton 2 & 3 A.B. "Buck" Catlin Chris Norby La Habra 2 John c. Holmberg* Bill Mahoney Los Alamitos 3 Charles Sylvia David Lander* Seal Beach 3 Oscar Brownell* Joyce A. Risner The Joint Chairman then recognized James Neal, the new representative from the City of Fountain Valley, and Oscar Brownell, the representative from the City of Seal Beach. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and accept resigna- tion of Mayor Jack Kelly of the That the letter from Mayor Jack Kelly of the City of Huntington Beach resigning from the Boards of Directors of County City of Huntington Beach Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 retroactive to November 21, and 11, be received, ordered filed and accepted 19831 and, FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be seated as members of the Boards: District(s) 3 11 11 Active Director John A. Thomas Ruth Bailey Ron Pattinson -3- Alternate Director Robert P. Mandie, Jr. Don MacAllister Don MacAllister 6/13/84 DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments ApProval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments ApProval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 ApProval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes ·to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Presentation of resolution of commendation and plaque to retired Director Donald A. Holt, Jr. Joint Chairman Richard Edgar presented a resolution of commendation, previously adopted by the Boards of Directors, to retired Director Donald A. Holt, Jr., expressing appreciation for his outstanding contributions and dedication to public service. A gavel plaque in recognition of his three-year's service as Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization was also presented to Mr. Holt. ALL DISTRICTS Adopting resolution expressing appreciation for services of Director Bill Vardoulis Joint Chairman Edgar reported that after seven years of service as a member of the Boards of Directors, past Joint Chairman Bill Vardoulis would be retiring from the Boards effective with the next regular Board meeting in July. Mr. Edgar submitted Resolution No. 84-85, conunending Director Vardoulis for his outstanding contributions and dedicated service to the Districts since 1977; whereupon, adoption of said resolution was moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. · -4- .... ... 6/13/84 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman briefly reported on Report of the Joint Chairman the California Association of Sanitation Agencies• Conference held in Sacramento on May 11 and 12, which he and Directors Don Smith and Jim Wahner attended along with the Manager and Assistant Manager. He announced that the Executive Board of CASA had appointed him to fill the unexpired term of retired Director Donald A. Holt, Jr. on that Board. This is a Director-at-Large position which will expire in August. Mr. Edgar then reported on the joint hearing conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) on June 8 in Riverside on the Districts• 30l(h) Waiver request and the modified National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. He attended the hearing along with Vice Chairman Don R. Griffin and former Joint Chairman Donald A. Holt, Jr., as well as members of the Districts• staff. Testimony was presented to EPA and CRWQCB which demonstrated that the Districts' have met all the requirements imposed upon them by said agencies as a prerequisite for the waiver/permit. The staff also gave a slide presentation on the Districts' efforts and accomplishments, including technical information relative to meeting the requirements. The extent and expense of the monitoring program required by EPA were of major concern to the Regional Board members. He noted, however, that the Districts were committed to meeting all of the permit requirements. Chairman Edgar indicated that the Regional Board is scheduled to approve the Districts' NPDES Permit on July 13 and, hopefully, the 30l(h) full secondary treatment waiver would be received by the end of July. The Joint Chairman then announced that the Building Committee would meet on Tuesday, June 26, at 5:30 p.m. to review the Districts' office space requirements. He also advised that the Proposed District 13 Steering Committee would meet on Wednesday, June 27, at 4:00 p.m. inunediately preceding the Executive Committee. Mr. Edgar then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, June 27, at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors Norman E. Culver and John Holmberg to attend and participate in the discussions. Approving appointments to Special Committees Joint Chairman Edgar ref erred to the listing of Directors• Committee assignments and reported that in making the appointments each agency was represented on a Committee. He stated that if any Director had an interest in serving on a specific committee to let him know and he would try to accommodate him, if possible. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Committee appointments, as set forth on the Current Committee List dated June 6, 1984, be, and are hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager Mr. Harper reported that he and the Assistant General Manager had attended the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington, in May. During the concentrated session, the Regional Administrator of EPA Region X addressed the group with the same information as the Region IX people had been giving the Districts relative to the extensive ocean monitoring requirements to be imposed in connection with 30l(h) waiver requests. -s- 6/13/84 He then briefed the Boards on the status of legislation being considered by Congress that would allow the Districts' proposed research planning study re deep ocean sludge disposal to continue. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: . \.,,,I Ratification of pa;yment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A", nBn and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 5L02l:S4 SL16L84 5L30L84 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund $ 452,738.03 $ 227,051.42 $ 555,561.44 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -623,396.22 166,618.06 775,726.14 .. Joint working Capital Fund 55,427.51 233,182.29 212,175.01 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 6,101.32 17,323.73 1,617.84 .- DISTRICT NO. 1 17.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 27,053.88 8,083.01 40,475.85 DISTRICT NO. 3 197,528.97 25,879.65 11,437.21 DISTRICT NO. 5 974.33 87,350.44 7,042.01 DISTRICT NO. 6 20.38 25.50 DISTRICT NO. 7 2,743.21 2,961.09 11,285.09 DISTRICT NO. 11 695.84 4,907.21 20,116.74 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 2,139.89 49.40 2,272.20 DISTRICTS NOS • 6 & 7 JOINT 16.87 3£062.72 16.87 $1£368£836.45 ! 776£469.02 $11:637£768.90 \._) ALL DISTRICTS Approving and authorizing renewal agreement with Digidyne Computer Services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-77, approving and authorizing execution of renewal agreement with Digidyne Computer Services for maintenance of the Districts' accounting computer system hardware for 1984-85, for an amount not to exceed $15,000. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the General Manager to approve and execute SupPlemental Agreements to Construction Contracts to provide for Substitu- tion of Securities in lieu of retentions cash retentions, as authorized of this resolution is attached Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-78, authorizing the General Manager to approve and execute Supplemental Agreements to Construction Contracts to provide for Substitution of Securities in lieu of by Government Code Section 4590. A certified copy hereto and made a part of these minutes. -6- 6/13/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving assignment of Purchase Order No. 14460 issued to Interox That the assignment of Purchase Order America to Peroxidation Systems, No. 14460 issued to Interox America for -..._I Inc. (PSI), a subsidiary of Interox supplying hydrogen peroxide for odor and sulfide control at the belt filter press facilities, Specification No. P-061, to Peroxidation Systems, Inc. (PSI), a subsidiary of Interox, be, and is hereby approved. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Job No. P2-26 Job No. P2-26, for an addition of Engineers for construction of two cleanouts originally specified to hereby, approved. A copy of this of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Primary Sedimentation Basins P & Q at Treatment Plant No. 2, $15,730.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig additional manhole structures in lieu of the provide better maintenance access, be, and is change order is attached hereto and made a part Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-099 specifications for Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099, authorizing an addition of $1,190.20 to the contract with CK Pump & Dewatering Corporation for removal of an existing slide gate and frame and granting a time extension of 36 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is \,,,,,,I attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-099 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-79, accepting Rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 "C" Headworks Influent Sewer Gates, Job No. PW-099, as complete, authorizing execution of Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Job No. PW-109 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-10~ authorizing an addition of $23,314.43 to the contract with Val Foth & son's for modifications and additions to the curb and gutter system, additional excavation and removal of undisclosed unsuitable material, and additional paving required, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re -...,; Job No. PW-109 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Paving at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job -7- 6/13/84 No. PW-109, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total addition of $694.96 to the contract with Val Foth & Son's, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-109 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-80, accepting Miscellaneous Paving at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-109, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Job No. PW-123 specifications for Piping for Return ~ Sludge Chlorination at Plant No. 2 Secondary Settling Basins, Job No. PW-123, authorizing an addition of $9,653.63 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for replacement instead of repair of an existing deteriorated chlorine line, and granting a time extension of 30 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. A copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. P2-5R-2 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-81, approving plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins F and ~ G at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-5R-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specif !cations re Job No. PW-119 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-82, approving plans and specifications for Paving and Drainage at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-119, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications re Job No. Pl-19-5 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-83, approving plans and specifications for Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 1 Dewatering Facilities, Job No. Pl-19-5, required for odor control and employee safety, and authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award a contract for said work to the low bidder, in an amount not to exceed $70,000.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -a- 6/13/84 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award contract re Job No~ PW-132 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-84, authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award a contract for Fabrication and Installation of Adapter Spools for Meter Replacements, Job No. PW-132, required in connection with the installation of the seven replacement influent magnetic flow meters authorized for purchase by the Boards at the February meeting to comply with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency as a condition of the Districts' proposed 30l(h) Waiver/NPDES Permit, for an amount not to exceed $65,000. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Rejecting all bids received re Job No. PW-083 and authorizing staff to rebid Moved, seconded and duly carried: That all bids received May 29th for Auto Shop Hoist at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-083, be, and are hereby, rejected due to an irregularity1 and, FURTHER M:>VED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to rebid said job. ALL DISTRICl'S Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Job No. PW-116 to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-86, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for UPS (Uninterrupted Power Source) System for Plant No. 2 RPU's (Remote Processing Units), Job No. PW-116, for Plant 2 computer system, to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, in the amount of $26,850.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRIC!'S Awarding Job No •. PW-121 to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-87; to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Waste Gas Burners at Plant No. 2, Job No. PW-121, to Frank Ultimo, General Building Contractor, in the amount of $54,900.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Job No. J-llR to Pacific Mechanical Systems Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-88, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Replacement Chiller Package for Laboratory Air Conditioner, Job No. J-llR, to Pacific Mechanical Systems in the amount of $28,647.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to H.V. Lawmaster re construction testing services services on an "as needed" basis, period June 13, 1984 through June Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to H.V. Lawmaster for construction testing in an aniount not to exceed $10,000 for the 30, 1985. -9- 6/13/84 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Smith-Emery re construction testing services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Smith-Emery for construction testing services on an "as needed" basis, in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for the period June 13, 1984 through June 30, 1985. ALL DISTRIC?S APProving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement in ward Street to the City of Fountain Valley Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-89, approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement to the City of Fountain Valley for right-of-way required in connection with City street improvements on ward street, at no cost to the City. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order D to Purchase Order No. 15577 to Lyons International Security, Inc. re additional security services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order D to Purchase Order No. 15577 to Lyons International Security, Inc. for additional security services required at Treatment Plant No. 2 during evaluation and implementation of various permanent plant security measures, at the rate of $9.25 per hour, increasing the total·authorized amount from $8,714.00 to an amount not to exceed $22,100.00 and extending the period from June 14, 1984 through October 31, 1984. ALL DISTRICTS Ratifying action of staff in issuing purchase orders to McKesson Chemical Company re bulk chlorine required for odor control at Plants 1 and 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the action of staff in issuing purchase orders to McKesson Chemical Company in a total amount not to exceed $24,000 for bulk chlorine required for odor control at Plants 1 and 2 due to the temporary inability of the existing supplier, Olympic Chemical Company, to supply the Districts' full requirements, be, and is hereby, ratified1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That further purchase of chlorine be, and is hereby, authorized on an as-needed basis from McKesson Chemical Company or other vendors with. available supplies on hand, during the period that Olympic Chemical Company is unable to fully supply the Districts' chlorine demands due to the forced relocation of their operation, all price differentials in excess of the contract price to be backcharged to Olympic Chemical Company. ALL DISTRICTS .Annual nomination for Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization open. This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the off ice of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary declared the nominations -· Director Richard B. Edgar was nominated as a candidate for the off ice of Chairman ~ of the Joint Administrative Organization. -10- 6/13/84 There being no further nominations, the Secretary reported that the election would be held at the regular July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts. \.,.I ALL DIS TRI crs Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on May 30, 1984, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Fiscal Policy Committee Report That the Fiscal Policy Committee's report and recommendations re 1984-85 personnel requirements and joint works budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Approving 1984-85 personnel reguirements and amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the 1984-85 personnel requirements be, and are hereby, approved as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee1 and, FURTHER l«>VED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-90, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1984-85 personnel requirements. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. \.,.I ALL DISTRICTS Approving the 1984-85 Joint Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following roll call vote: Operating Budget AYES: Directors Ruth Bailey, Oscar Brownell, Buck Catlin, Sam Cooper, Norman Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Bruce Finlayson, Henry R. Frese, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, John Holmberg, Carol Kawanami, Gerald Mullen, James Neal, Arthur Newton, Ron Pattinson, Bob Perry, Ruthelyn Plummer, Don Roth, Donald J. Saltarelli, Don E. Smith, Roger Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, John Thomas, Bill Vardoulis, James Wahner, Henry w. Wedaa. NOES: None ABSENT: Martha v. Weishaupt That the Joint Operating Budgets of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 for the 1984-85 fiscal year, be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows: Joint Operating/Working Capital Funds $23,599,000.00 Workers• Compensation Self-Insured Fund 503,000.00 Self-Funded Health Plan Trust Fund 670,000.00 ·Public Liability Self-Insured Fund 617,500.00 -11- 6/13/84 ALL DISTRicr9 Approving the 1984-85 Capital outlay Revolving Fund Budget Moved, seconded and duly carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Directors Ruth Bailey, Oscar Brownell, Buck Catlin, Sam Cooper, Norman Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Bruce Finlayson, Henry R. Frese, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, John Holmberg, Carol Kawanami, Gerald Mullen, James Neal, Arthur Newton, Ron Pattinson, Bob Perry, Ruthelyn Plummer, Don Roth, Donald J. Saltarelli, Don E. Smith, Roger Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, John Thomas, Bill Vardoulis, James Wahner, Henry w. Wedaa. NOES:. None ABSENT: Martha v. Weishaupt That the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (Joint Works Construction) of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of $33,620,000.00. ALL DISTRICl'S Approving and authorizing execution of Real Property Lease at Plant No. 1, Specification No. L-009-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-91, approving and authorizing execution of Real Property Lease at Plant No. 1, Specification No. L-009-1, with American Balboa Properties for a maximum of 15 years for the amount of $45,000 for the first year and, thereafter, for 10% of the Lessee's verifiable annual gross revenues, with a minimum annual lease payment of $50,000. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICl'S Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Rules of Procedure Resolution No. 64-3 re succession That the Boards of Directors hereby to off ice of the Joint Chairman adopt Resolution No. 84-92, amending and Vice Joint Chairman Rules of Procedure Resolution No. 64-3, as amended, providing for succession to office of the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman in the event of a vacancy. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and parti- cipate in meetings, hearings, conference, facilitiy inspections and other functions which will be of value to the Districts Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized ~o designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in meetings, hearings, conferences, facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation1 and, FURTHER M:>VED: That reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts' policy and approved annual budget. -12- 6/13/84 ALL DISTRICTS Declaring the proposed project to replace nine existing centrifuges with nine of the more efficient "'-"' Ashbrook-Simon-Hartley (Winklepress) belt filter presses as a categorically-exempt project under CEQA Quality Act1 and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the proposed project to replace nine existing centrifuges with nine of the more efficient ·Ashbrook-Simon-Hartley (Winklepress) belt filter presses, be, and is hereby, declared a categorically-exempt project under the California Environmental FURTHER MOVED: That the action of the Executive Committee in directing the staff to file a Notice of Exemption re said project with the Secretary of the State Resources Agency, County Clerk and other interested parties, be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Convene in closed session re personnel matters ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session ALL DISTRICTS Actions taken in closed session The Boards of Directors convened in closed session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 at 7:56 p.m. The Boards of Directors reconvened in regular session at 8:27 p.m. The following actions taken by the Boards of Directors in closed session are herein reported out: It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter dated May 30, 1984, from Fred A. Harper, General Manager, requesting retirement effective July 1, 1984, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That earned supplemental annual vacatlon authorized by the Boards of Directors on January 13, 1982, unused due to the press of Districts' business matters, be, and is hereby, authorized to be paid to Fred A. Harper, General Manager, at his rate of compensation in effect at date of retirement. · It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That assignment of the General Manager's Associate Administrative Assistant, Jean Mosher, to the position of Laboratory Operant-Analyst at said employee's present salary rate (Range 1060, Step S, $2326/Mo.) until such time as the salary range for the position of Laboratory Operant-Analyst exceeds said.amount, be, and is . ·hereby, authorized effective July 6, 1984. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That J. Wayne Sylvester be, and is hereby, appointed to the position of General Manager effective July 1, 1984. It was moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous acclamation: -13- 6/13/84 That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 84-103, commending Fred A. Harper upon his retirement as General Manager for his outstanding contributions and dedicated service to the Districts since 1959. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to County Auditor for payment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Director of Finance be, and is hereby, authorized to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for irmnediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1984, and declaring that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts, until the 1984-85 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. ALL DISTRicrs Approving agreement with John carollo Engineers re design of Job Nos. Pl-21, P2-28-l and P2-28-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Conunittee certification re final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed1 and, FURTHER M>VED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-93, approving agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-21, Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-28-l, and Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Hanaling Facilities, Job No. P2-28-2, on an hourly-rate basis plus overhead, direct expenses and prof it, for a total amount .· not to exceed $720,500.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached ~ hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRicrs Approving amendment to purchase order agreement with John Carollo Engineers re preparation of an energy management plan, to include conducting a SCE lighting energy conservation study Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with John Carollo Engineers be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-94, approving amendment to purchase order agreement with John Carollo Engineers (Change Order A to Purchase Order No. 39212) re preparation of an energy management plan, to provide for additional services to conduct a lighting energy conservation study in cooperation with southern California Edison Company, on an hourly-rate basis plus overhead, direct expenses and profit, for an amount not to exceed $45,000.00, and increasing the total amount of said purchase order from $25,000 to an amount not to exceed $70,000. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared this meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., June 13, 1984. -14- 6/13/84 DISTRicr 2 Receive and file request for annexation from Dr. and Mrs. Ivan Martinez and authorizing initiation of proceedings re proposed Annexa- tion No. 29 -Wiens Annexation and is hereby, received and ordered Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request from Dr. and Mrs. Ivan Martinez for annexation of .78 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, be, filed; and, FURTHER M>VED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-96-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District, proposed Annexation No. 29 -Wiens Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Receive and file request for annexation from Texaco Anaheim Hills/Gunston Hall Company re proposed Annexation No. 59 - Anaheim Hills Annexation No. 9 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request from Texaco Anaheim Hills, Inc./Gunston Hall Company, Inc. for annexation of 70.63 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Hidden Canyon Road and Avenida de Santiago in the Anaheim Hills area of the City of Anaheim, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and referred to staff for study and recommendation. DISTRicr 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 46 - !yan Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-97-2, ordering annexation of .72 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim, proposed Annexation No. 46 - Ryan Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., June 13, 1984. DISTRicr 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Contract No. 3-28R to Mike Prlich & Sons That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-98-3, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-28R, to Mike Prlich & Sons in the amount of $824,240.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., June 13, 1984. -15- 6/13/84 DISTRicr 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ordering Annexation No. 110 - Walden-Walsh Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-100-7, ordering annexation of .462 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of \.,I Orangeview Road and Treasure Lane in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 110 -Walden-Walsh Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRicr 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 112 - Tract No. 10947 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-101-7, ordering annexation of 10.10 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Rancho Santiago Boulevard and Bond Avenue in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 112 -Tract No. 10947 to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRicr 7 Receive and file request for annexation from Ponderosa Homes and authorizing initiation of proceedings re proposed Annexation No. 120 -Tract No. 9707 area, be, and is hereby, received and Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request from Ponderosa Homes for annexation of 1.540 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santiago Canyon Road and Cannon Street in the Orange Park Acres ordered f iled1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-102-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to ~ the District, proposed Annexation No. 120 -Tract No. 9707 to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRicr 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., June 13, 1984. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., June 13, 1984. DISTRicr 5 Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit Proposals and negotiate for design of Contract No. 5-26 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate for the design of Replacement of Approximately 1,200 Feet of the Lido Force Main from the Lido Pump Station to the Valve at Station 93+50, Contract No. 5-26, for consideration by the Board. -16- • < 6/13/84 DISTRICTS 5 & 6 The following items were considered relative to the Final Environmental Impact Report for District 5 and the Southern Half of District 6: Items relative to Final EIR on Master Plant Report for District 5 and Southern Half of District 6 Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: Summarizing Final EIR That the Staff Report dated June 5, 1984 summarizing the Final EIR on the Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Verbal report of EIR consultant, Envirosphere Company The Chair recognized Mr. Al Schneider of Envirosphere Company, the Districts' EIR consultant, who briefly reviewed the comments received on the Draft EIR and addressed the issues raised in said comments, most of which related to biological considerations in the vicinity of the Santa Ana River mouth. He advised that the Final EIR indicates that the proposed construction alignments will not affect wildlife in the area and that the Districts will cooperate fully with all regulatory agencies prior to commencing construction on each project. He also reviewed the remaining CEQA steps that would be taken upon approval of the EIR. In response to a question from Chairman Hart, it was clarified that no plans have been submitted to the Districts at this time for development of the Crystal Cove Beach by the State. Accordingly, a timetable for construction of the Crystal Cove Pump Station has not been established. When plans are developed and sewerage facilities are required, the Districts will coordinate with the various agencies to determine the most appropriate siting. Receive and file written comments re Draft EIR Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the following written comments received after the public hearing on April 11, 1984, re Draft EIR, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Agency United States Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service State of California, Office of Planning and Research California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region State of California, Department of Fish & Game -17- Date April 18, 1984 May 3, 1984 April 24, 1984 April 25, 1984 6/13/84 State of California, Department of Parks & Recreation Southern California Association of Governments County of Orange Environmental Management Agency Orange County EMA Transportation Planning Division Orange County EMA Project Planning Division Orange County EMA Open Space/Recreation/Special Districts Program Off ice City of Irvine April 25, 1984 May 1, 1984 February 28, 1984 April 17, 1984 May 3, 1984 May 1, 1984 April 19, 1984 Receive, file and approve Final There being no further questions, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: EIR That the Final Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved1 and, FURTHER M:>VED: That the Boards hereby certify that said Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the State and District Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. Certifying Final Environmental Moved, seconded and duly carried: Impact ReJ;?Ort That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-99, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report on said Master Plan Report, making certain findings in connection therewith, and adopting a statement of overriding conditions. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:35 p.m., June 13, 1984. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:35 p.m., June 13, 1984. -18- ( ( ( FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/26/84 PAGE 1 r:r-. ---Al1'lfRT1JUHB£R AP43 -·--.----------------·---i1 -r-11:1-~~;~ ~;-~o .------v EN~~-R--~uN_TY SAN~mt~~ ~ ! ~::::~~~~~-~o R~~G-~_c:u~T~--. ---~~-;~;-,~~-;~~--. . .. .. . ..·.. . . . .. 1:1 ~~ 1· , -uc-lf7B9 A-;i.-rmnurnrwirc:-ru01P"e"t:U""e ·s6sr.7z-------Et"ECTRlt1\t-SuPPnEs-------------------------· ---; c 068790 A.R.A. MFG. co. $80.49 TRUCK PARTS '" 'I' 06f'791 AOVANCO CCNSTRUCTORS1 INC. s2e1,132.10 CONTRACTOR P2-25-2, RETENTION P2-27 :· ,.,--·-··---nE"E.17%•-----A·rn-FRODUCTs··s-cff£HfCAt"stlNC";----------------se;e65~00"--· ---------SPECIALTY GASES ------·-·· -· ------·-. 1·1 11 ~ 06f.793 All-STATE! VEHICLES, INC. Slt22'1.9.2 VEHICLE LEASING '"i' ·.,. 068794 ALLIED SUFPLY co. S62.01 PIPE SUPPLIES j: .. 1 ,. --oDB795 AKCO-VULYflERICSt INC. n·lf8-;r;u-------TOO["S ---·---·-' ,;! 0687% AMTEC PROCUCTS CO. S27.2lt PUMP PARTS j •.• , •. 1 068797 ANAHEIM SE&IER CONSTRUCTION $350.00 CSDOC #3 REPAIRS ;::i 1r.: --··o6679R-----rnrAWCROR--PACKING-co-.--------------·---s1-;544.69-·------coHPRESSOR PARTs-···-····-·---.. ···-----· . . . . . ~ ... !.,, OE8759 ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES stoo.oo TOWEL RENTAL j"'I I•.•. 06l!BOO AGUA BEN CORP. S361825e65 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS '.; .. ~------a6·a-eur ARR uw-R I SCO"tTNC. . $"38r.O r l"FCTIU-C~L-SUPPL-1 ES -------------·-... j .. '. 06P802 UROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. . SH 7 • 74 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ' d------~~:~~~---·-··----~~-~~~~~~T~~-8 ~~:~~~~~~Nr.--------------------s~~~;~:.---·------~::l:~~~ ~-~-1~·s .. -.. -· ·-·-··· --·-··· ·-. . j·: 1 I:~ 0688C5 BEAR SALES & SERVJCE1INC. $181952.80 AUTO SCOPE-SMOG ANALYZER ·I j11:: 068806 6ECKMAN Jf\STRUHENTS Slf26.34 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ::/ ;;;,;:>--C6811"0? BELL p I Pr-rsuPPrr-cu;-$ 1'49~~ PUMP-PARTS_____ ---·--·----------:J 1 1 )1 ll6e808 PAUL BERGERON $53 .20 EMPLOYEE HI LE AGE : ·• Jt~ OE8809 BERTECH s72.27 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES :~1 t..! OE8811 C & R RECCt\DJTIONING CO. $11115.00 PUMP REPAIRS . ·'I L•··--·--0Ge-snr------rnr-euRKL1:0~1PJNV----------,33a;&r-------PAINr-suPPL1Es····-··-------------·-·------·-----· ·---·-1., 111 fi68812 CK PUMP A~O OEWATERJNG CORP. S37t754.11 CONTRACTOR PW-099 ~ .r -··--n6-8l1"I:S-Cl",--C-rrfFU"RNTAt INC. n.To5;1f2-----·ycrKD-PRUCBSTNtJREP'A-1·Rs·--------------·-•• , H 0 6 8 8 l If c s c 0 Hp AN y $ 5 0 8 • !) :s p I p E s up p LI Es . ! :~ j!;I 068E\15 c."'.P.c.A. 1980·00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION ... , ,r----IJ 6 lt {I JE,-------ru1 FO"R N u-cuNT PU [ s·-·c 0 ;·· ------------·--·-·---·---13 5 ~ 0 o··--------·-·n E CTR I c AL. RE PA I Rs ------. . . . .. . . 1: ·1 1 ... , C!HH7 CAMBRIDGE FILTER CORP. $27.88 FREIGHT • , .. , l;.,1 ~6~P1A CARMENJU FCRD TRUCK SALtS, INC. S391.70 TRUCK PARTS :'.i li! ------oEffBT~ JOHN~rno·-·rNGT~J(ERS--___ s·a·1·1nT~P ENGR-:·-Pl-=2n ~---J-=-T 5-;-,, 2=2r: z-;-ENERGY-TAS K" FORCE··--·-·---·1,;· I .. ! CiHA20 JOHN C/IROLLO ENGINEERS $1t503.lf7 ENGR. P2-27' P2-26 I···' •·! Of8821 JOHN CAROLLO ENG/GREELEY HANSEN S5t279.94 1982-83 OVERHEAD ADJUSTMENTS P2-23, P2-24 :::: 1.ui----(1686~2--------cHR"IS-crRvrtloNr. --·----·--------~----------·-------·saas;oo·----. -----ENGINEERING SERVICES' . ·.,I 1111 068823 CHEVRON u.s.A •• INC. S12tlf:S0.99 GASOLINE, ENGINE OIL l··:I !:• G68A2'f CINCIN~ATI TIME Ec.'UJP., INC. U6t582.99 CONTRACTOR PW-101 ·'.:-: 1 •• ----·-·a6BR2s-------·-r.rvn:-cnnrn urcrc rs-Arr-------------s49~ 56 ______ lOc·Ks·------·-· -· --------··---------·-------· -·----· ··--·./..,! !., 1'68826 COAST FIRE EGUIPKENT $5lf.62. FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE :···i I " 06e827 COMPRESSOR SYSTEMt INC. U8elf9 COMPRESSOR PARTS ... :o -----···o i; 8 82 0----------·-coNSOClDA TED [[EC TP"H::u·-o I ST; -·--··-· .... ---··---------$3"1192 ~4 3--· ...... _ .. --ELECTRICAL. SUP Pl I ES 1 11 06f'829 CONTINEl\TH CHE1'41CH CO $1,998.10 CHLORINE .:~1-·------~~:gi--------~~~~~~~~rAuto-PA-irrs;-nn:--.--·--·-------·-----------:.~~r :-~~---: _____ ----··--~~~~~-~ ~~:~s~-u~P~-1-~-~--------· -----··---····----·- t0: 068832 COUNTY klCE AMC S62.'t9 TRUCK PARTS i:•i 06A833 CRO~JN FENCf & SUPPLY co., INC. Slf,761.61 CONTRACTOR PW-105 !~:-·· ·o,;1.1~·34----·-·c11c·coNSOLlOATED-IJA""TER-··· ------···---·· ·····-··----... ·--····· !164.45·· .... 'RESIN TANK EXCHANGE, WATER SOFTENER"RENTAL ~ tJ ............ --····----------·-····---·-·· .... .... . ........ ---.. ------.... --..... -···--................ •· .. . ·H i l '•j :·.1 ··-·-.;I 1···· ~' . ! 'r J ··.···; ,•11, ··i 'I ... , 1.: '.(GI 1, FUND NO q19q -JT DIST ~ORKING CAPITAL PROCFSSING DATE lf/2~/8lf PAGE ~ ,,-------·----------------------·-------~--·----·----------·~----------·------;apOP.f-NlHii3tfCAPq3 -··-·--·----·····---.. ----·----· 1:1----..... ----·-----. -··-···-·--·-·---.... --· ---~-~u~r~-~~-N~m:~~ ~U~.R-~~}~2 ~~-4 OR~-~-Gr COUNTY 'll ! j~ l.Jf.RR.HIT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION l~~--·--o67ie 35 _______ LAPRY-CU~Ti-1RTiCi<&fQU I PHE NT $ r~26·0~·00-· ---·------E(ftH PH ENT ... R"Hh A[ ____________ ------·--·- ,. I I· ---._ ..... ·~ i•':! L: £!H836 CALIF. STATE UNIVrnSITY $85.00 PURCHASING SEMINAR ;,: 06~837 OMEt INC. S373.12 TRUCK PARTS i j •.• ;-·· · ·-c6&a31t------·----···DA"tcv--;s11xr·-·--·-· ---------------------··-··-----··---····-····--·--us~oo---·-------· i.E:GAC Al>VERTisiNG ··-· · · ·:· ... ! 068839 DANA MFG., INC. f917.5lf PUMP PARTS J·"i i,.; C:68P.'f0 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE nat.'13 TRUCK TIRES . . . . -.. ••i ;,,!----·--·rre;aHr------·-p1·rrrc-·;-·c>"nrro--ccr;-··------------i69o3o·~-·oo-------··coNtifAct'of\ --pw: t 02-···· -------....... _ .... -·-··· ----····--····· ·-· ·· ---·---·.· I•-' 06eA 112 DAVIS co~FAHY $BO.s2 SHALL HARDWARE ··· !::!--. .. ~~;.:~~ ·----··--·-g~_c.gUE[lE-& .. SONS -GD ss---ccr-;----·-·-····-----.. ·----.... -··· ---· ~2-.• :n-: ~~. ---·--. nn~R I CA~ SUPPLIES . .. -. :"'. j,,I 0688'f5 0£.W-FAR SALES & SfRYICE $279.7-9 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS l'.'i I I I ::·:L .. _. ---g~:-~~;--ii{i~~~-~-iirrwA·s1r---s-v-srrns·;--rnc. u i~-~t;;---------Mhf·}~H-:-~; .. ~~-~<1.!!IPHf:~_T---···--·-··---·· -···------·· ·-·----..... .(! H 0688'f8 DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. S5t817.90. RETENTION PW-110 v i.11 OEP81t9 DORR-OLIVERt INC. S60le83 REGULATOR PARTS l:·I . -· -u; E 850 ____ ,,_ -·-·rnt:"DR AiJI f\G BO.Aire ·-·nijc-;·----·-·------·--· ---·· --· --··--·----$66~ OB. --·-··-----·--OFF i•tE SUPPL i ES ~.: -06P.ll!:l DUMAS OlESfL INJECTION $lt523.46 ENGINE PARTS :;:~f----~~-~-~~~-·-----{~~~J~ ~A-~~~/~~ p. ---$1 !~i~:-n------{~~-~-h-~~-~~-~H-h·-----·------·------... > "'2 O~Be5lf EUCTROtHC eALANCJNG co. • $57.50 SCROLL BALANCING i,1'. ... fJ68855 ENCHl\NTERt INC. s3,500.oo OCEAN MONITORING ____ JI ··-!jli : !'-~ IJI · .;· · --·-r6ees6 _______ rNv"iiH>N;.;r·K nr ·1H.'somn:r ·1'ssoc:----·-----·--·------···-----· s97 ~so--·-· ---------iAa ANAL vs is j h Of.f•8':7 FILTER SUFPLY CO. • $840.10 ENGINE PARTS i ·•: 0 ~ R l! 5 8 F 1 SC HE R & F 0 f< T£ R C 0 • $ 3 H • 0 If P I PE S UP P LI E S ;·1 1 .. OE e p59-------~[ll-SYSHf-rs------·-------·------·-·1·2"$l;·2-o·----· -----· PUHJ,--PAf\rs·---------------..... -----··- I·.·.· .. 1:.i !.1 --·-----···--· -·-------•.... ·•! •I :.1 ;..; 068e.f0 CLIFFORC A. FORKf.RT Ulft.S72.85 ENGR. 3-28R, SURVEY P2-26 :.i'. G6A861 VAL FOTH 8 SONS $3t010e37 CONTRACTOR PW-109 . i,; !:.T ---~f:::;·-----·--·-:~~-~~~j~~~~;~~~~:N:~-;;;;·u·;;·-·-··-·--·---... --. !~!::!r-· --. ~~=~R~~~~~·~:R~S ·-. -. 1::1 !·•.! f!68 86lf FREf WAY TRUCK PARTS $18 3 • 83 TRUCK PARTS I"' :.i . ·--· ""d6886s-·----G\il-WAHifENANtt9-n~c. ·------------------$9~~-H------·SHALL-HAR.DWARE-------------------·-·--------·-·-· -. ----, .. i :.,'. 06BeH GANMIL LUf".BER CO. $1,309.81 LUHBER r.·;i l•·I 0(8867 GEM-C'·lllE PLASTICS CORP. 167.60 SHALL HARDWARE i··! ,::j ~~:::~ --·----~~~r~:~~:~L~=~~~~~co;----· ·-· -·· -. --·-.. ,i ~!~: :~~-·-·· .. -. ~~~~~"~=~rns . ·-. . . . J:'.j I)-·--·--~:::~}--------~;t~-~~r~~~~!:!_£~-·-----------------------·---H!~;~~--------·y~~h-~~_PY_LJ~-~-------------------· -·--------------------i:.: IJ .. mm------~ii;~~~~~i~:~~i; c~~~tAclf ___ . ·-·-··· -.... ... . ........ ;nm . . . m~r mh!~~~l !!~m SUPPLg~ t~ II" 068075 HURLEY ELECTRONICS, INC. $34.~8 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES l•l e 068876 HYOROTEX S2t938.32 ENGINE OILS L ------·~!!:;!-----1 -~rol~~~:~~~~IT ---·---------------····------------~~~-~:~;-· ---·-------~~~~T~-~~:f 1 ~~PPL i ES---·------·------- ··1 G68879 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $132.q2 SHALL HARDWARE ··: ·--··.·-·(I~ 8 SO(r-·-----INGirAfrPAPER ______ --------------·--··------· -·--· ---·--··-$450 ;~ff ---_,,_ .. JAN i ioR i AL SUPPLi ES . --. -· . . -- .. I I ::.I ·--------------------·----------•· --·· -· ···-··-------~-·-·-------· --·--.. ---·-···-··· ··-----·------... -···-----· .. ·----------··--·-·-·-.. ·--------·-·-·· ······-· ---···--. ·r1 . ..,l -· ... ··-· -··------· ( . ···-·--------, .. ••·· •· ... ·-·--·-·· n··-.. , ... __ ·······-( "' IO I/ ·---------------··---~ ·( 1:.:1~ ~ ,' ,, ' I· ( ( ( FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WCRKING CAFITAL P~OCESSING DATE q/2b/Aq PAGf 3 ir-·---·---------·-------·------··-RrPORT"lHJMBr:R-"JP"lf3--. --·----···-·-··-··--·pl COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 11 ; r ·11:1 WAR·~~~--~;.----·--------------·~~~~~-R-·· ·-----------------~~-~IM~ ~-A-~~~~~;O-~/S~ -----. . . .. --~~~;RI;~ I~~ -. . ---. i~I :. I r.1 iE ,r----u-6-P.ITT:!l -YIVSTRURENTATTOl'rTAlrt>~-~·llRYtTNC---------------ir;-975;50---·-----·ue·-s·opp[lES'---··-·-··-·-------·---------·--·· ------·1., 1.1 068882 JNMAC 1200.14 COMPUTER SUPPLIES i•·• ;.,'! 068883 INTEROX AMEPICA U6t732.5lf HYDROGEN PEROXIDE :;'. u-·-·--·~::::~------· --~~~!~~-~~~~~~~~~~~R~~=r--· ---···-·--·-·-·----··-·· ··-·-· --~·;, ~~~~; ~p-··--· . ·--. -~~~er ~~~~:TENANCE . -. ·-· ... ··-··· -· ··-······· ... -J:.: 1 .. 1 068e86 JOtlNST CN F UHF cc. S75 0 ·If 8 SHALL HARDWARE • "I 1,:,i·-----06P.ll8/ 1nurm-er·mNGs-r-sUPPCY--·-----·----s'i~"lL _____ BEi\RTN«r-sUPPLTES-···-----------. 1" 1 ,,1 06f.888 KING BEARJNGt me. Sltt629.29 BEARING SUPPLIES I'' ,.j H 8 8 8 9 I< 0 MAX SYS T Ef' S t I NC • S 5 t It 9 0 • 8 0 S C RU BB I NG E Q U I PH E NT ! ~:' '·fir------oESP9(r---·---c;1r;g-;-s;9··rnc-;-------·-·-----···------···--·-·--·-······--$721;23 ··--·-·--···-wELDING SUPPLIES, SAFETY SUPPLIES j·· 1., .%~891 PEN[ LANDRY ENTfRFRJSrs Ul'f.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES •.• I,/ Oft8A92 LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGR. Slft959.:JO ENGR. P2-5R-2 I::: ,.J---·ll6ln!rn---i.-nmTTNU-t:TnRTUUTURSTTNC. $'354~'01J _______ ELECTR l'CAl.-SUPPLTEs---·-----------~········---··--· -·i,.. 1 1 .o: llfJlt89lf LOCAL AGENCY FOR~UTJON COMM $250.00 ANNEXATION #58 PROCESSING FEE !:' 111 068895 LOWRY & ASSOCIATES S34t558.00 ENGR. 3-25, 3-21.i-1, 2-10-IA, 2-25 ,, l:t-=---~~~~~;--·---·-· -~:~~~~P~~~·~~ .. JNc·; -·----... --·----·------·--------···--; g~: ~~ -··· ---·--·-······!:~~~S PARTS --·· ---.. j·.: L,l:J> C6fl89El r.ARVAC ELECTRONICS $132.03 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES j'.'. !; •. -1--OFBIPJl:J IT:A 11 -CFJC-CRtTllir.-'S'St22"7';1i6 ---PTPl:-S'UPPDU--------·-··------------··-·--· -----·;~ ! .. !~ 06e900 ~CCOY TRACTOR & EQUIPP'.fNT . S254e't0 TRUCK PARTS h jj. --=-----~~::g~. ______ : ____ ~~~~~.~~~1 ~~~~~! ~~-;~~~PAN_! __ ··--------·-· __ ··---___ ··----::j~: ~~· -·· .... _ ----· __ ~~~~~ ~!R~~~v~~~R. HA~ N_TEN~~c E_ _ . .. ;;; 1 1 .,.,·1 ~6P903 MORR ISON SUPPLY CO. $261.95 PI PE SUPPL I ES ~~~ 1 ~· C 6 8 ~ C 4 fl 0 T 0 R 0 U t I NC • $ 9 9 9 • 2 9 D I AG N 0 ST I C H E TE R ,,: H-·-·---o-ea9us-----i-rrcu-r-Ncusrn-rcs---n~-~"hs·------·s11Arr-AARl5WAlff--··--·--·------·---·--··-----------·-· .'.' ·1! ut:ac;iu6 NATIONAL LUp.teER SUPPLY $300.09 SHALL HARDWARE • I,:! Cf.8907 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $200.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FEE ;_, I ll~--··-···· :rEil19iJ8 NnJONA[--TECHNICAl--INFOR'MHimf-·-·--·-------·----·--··-· ·-t9s.·oo·· ····--· .. RHC--PliBllCAtlON. ·--. -· .. --· ,.'.'I .'.~! 0684309 CITY OF NElJ~ORT eEACH s.11 WATER USEAGE .•. ~" (·66';10 OCCIOEt\TAL CHEMICAL CORP. S2t3He95 CAUSTIC SODA j !)--... ··o6P:9Tl OLYMFrc-·ClfnflCArt·o-; ·----n 0;·~1 a-;u--------cHCOtfl tu--------·-·--------------------------------~,,l k 0 6 e 9 12 0 R ANGE C 0 UN T Y CHE M I CA l C 0 • S 5 3 • 8 8 CHE H I CAL S I..... I•; 0669n ORHJGE VALVE & FITTING co. Slt598.0't PIPE SUPPLIES/CONNECTORS ,. .. , l.,·-·····-··o6R91'f--------·-ovEJ<f-iEA[;-[00P."CO Of"ORANG[""C:TY" ______ ---···-··-· ··-... $242.25 .... --.. PLANT H2 ROLL-UP DOOR REPAIRS · .• j .. I u68515 cxYGF:N HRVICE s49.77 SPECIALTY GASES l"'I 1..1 C 6£11: 16 COUNTY CF OR ANGr U t U2 2 el 6 P RE-EHPLOYHENT EXAHS :::. l .J-----0 E"8 9 t~ c O'UNT'JS A Nl TA TI 0 N-DTSTRICTS-o r--o RANGE" .. c OU Nn----·s 6'i1l6 2 ;a 2------· -·iu: HEN I s H' ·wo R KER s .--·c OMP ~--FUN o-----· ---------. -----1· I tt1 068918 PTO SALES $272.25 PUMP 1·1 ' ""Ir 068919 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT co. $499.07 SAFETY SUPPLIES . -:.'. ;~--·----~~~~~~-----·-····---·~:~~~~c·~a~~~·wI~-..... --·-·--·-· --· ---·. -··-··--.•.. s~-1-!::~:~~ . ... . -· ~~~~=!~~~!"~2-~6. -· .. .. :.:j :: -----~~:: ~i------~~~~~-~~~~Ro SE" TC£ -------------------------'!~ ~; ~~ -. ------·--m~ mm-~~~ WHm I Nn n--. ---------------~:I l...1 0 6 8 9 2 4 FR O C ES S C C MP 0 N r. N T S C 0 • t J NC • Sl 0 8 • 7'+ E NG I N E PART S · ·" t:I----~ ~ ~~ ~ ~-.. -·----~~~~ ~ ~ s: t~~ ~ ~~-~~ .. ~-~ ~ ~-ci·: ~ ~ ~~----·-·----···--------· ---·-·-· ·: ~ : ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ · · ·· · -· ----· --·-~: ~ ~ ~ · · ~ C ~ ~ ~ i' .. 1 '•"1 • r:I ..r. --· ---_ .. -.. -----·---__ .. ____ ·-- -··-··---------·-----------·------·--....... ---.• ··-·--··~ -"'·------··----··---.. ·•· ·-·-··· ---·-·-···· .. . . ··--·--··-·····--·· --, .............. --·-.. "J -·-----I'··· -··-- ... "' ~ . FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST UCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE ~/26/84 FAG( q ;r--------------------------·-----·-----·-------------P,TP1lRT·-NuJfer.n-AP1i3--··· ----·--··-·-·--·---·· r 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF O~ANGE COUNTY I~ 1 ·. ···~ A·R~-;~;··-N ~-.--· ·-·-----·--------~;~-0 ~ ~ ----------·------·-«:!:~ I Hs_ __ P_A ! ~~~::~ ~ /-84 ··-. . . . --. . .. 0£ S CR IP Tl ON I" ,,l-----·--o-0Pr;27--m:trF:lITSTtR-··----·---~--·----·------,39sE>7;-'J2 ______ ct.AS'STFlED-·ADVERT Is INc··--·--· ---·--·---··--······-··,.· I·~; 068920 THE REGISTEP $l,'t22.96 LEGAL ADVERTISING .I 068929 RICHARDSON & LEOOUEF CO. S168t102.9D CONTRACTOR 3-21-2R l,.,r-·-··--· Cf;P.:93Ci----------·R·oe-EfH"S"H'O.-CONTROLs-cCJ.------·-·-·····----··------····------.... tr2ll ~ 17 ···-·-. -·----ELECTRICAL SUPPL I es--·· .. . .... !11I u6~931 ~oss & OARROWSt INC. 1756.00 ROOF REPAIRS j11r OE-F.932 JOSErH Te RYERSON g. SONt INC. $158.07 STEEL STOCK ;,,~----·-irF;,;~33------s·,rnrorrnrc·. · · ------s-92;s"2·s-;-ocr---·-coNTRP\tToR-·r=2R=·r,T----------·-·--····---------···--- ' '•' ·I 1 ii !,I . -··--~ I 1.:.1 ;,,' !· I' j :·i ''! ''i :'·1 1 .. : 06093't SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $1 9 570.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES ::;/-..... ····~~:~~~----------~:~~:--:~-:-~~~g~RJc-,.romRs-··--·..:..--------~---····--·---·--i;~.~;.~~ -···----------~~~~~R~~.~~~TOR REPAIRS" ...... -· -.. ..... H !.:J O 6 B 9 3 7 C 1 TY 0 F S E AL B E A CH $ 91 • 3 O WA TE R U S EA GE L 'I ! " C. 6 e 9 3 B SE /I H S t R 0 En UC K & C 0 • $ 2 , 9 8 7 • 6 0 T 0 0 L S j: :~ ~ .. ~----·--ucB9'39 ____________ S'HH,R"UC'f\SUF'PrY"----·· -S'2'89·~r~-96-------CHAIN S1JPHHS"/rbO[S ____ -----------···-·-··· ·-· ·-·-····-·· ·········1...I H 0689lf0 SMITH BROS. co. $5't.27 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1 •• 1 0689lf1 SN/lP•ON TOOLS CORP.. $86.02 TOOLS " !...!-...... c 6 FI? lj 2-----s ourn-co·A ST-"OFFI t r·--a;m F HENT ___________ -------$ 27 8; 74·· .. --. -·--·---·o FF I c E -Fu RN IT u RE.. . ·-. . j ·, ,,,! 1 ::= 06f9lf3 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. S.328tn5.35 POWER ,;, I,.. J:::a C.: Ef. 9 4 lf S G • CA LI F • WAT ER C 0. U 6. 9 8 WA TE R USE AGE .. '··-T----or;ac;lfS s·ournER"K"""COUNTIE"S\JlLl:'O. !U?9"961J.?f 8 0 rEHc·run:-----------·--·---------·---·---·· -----:··: l l, .. 1 -i::' 0689% STfllNLESS PIPE & FITTING CO. $502.92 PIPE SUPPLIES ;:•, ~~!---~·-~~~~:~--------~~:-~~~c~!~~~~---------------------·--·--------~-gt~~--------~r~~~R~~~~\UPPU Es-···· .. ·-·-·····--· --·-. . . . . c Ml 068~lf9 SUPER CHE~ CORP 1954.00 CHEMICALS lh " 0 6 e 9 5 G sup (R I 0 R L IM [ & c Hr H I c AL c 0 R p • $ 3 ' 11 6 • 3 0 0 D 0 R c 0 NT R 0 L c ti EH I c AL s -LI HE ;; ,.~-.. ·-·m;F9:i"J-----· --rnr"SlJFPrrrR·r--~2-i7>l;1-;n SAFETY-SUP Pl I Es-·-----·-·------·----·-··-------·------· ·1:• ,,.j 06S952 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. . $55.ei TOOLS ;·~I .1"·1. C68S53 SYORON -CASTLE $331.52 LAB REPAIRS l"l 1~,---... ·~!!:~:------·----~·~~·~c~~~;~s~~: J ~~~-~;-;;-ONJ NG·---·-----------------:~!~:~~---------·-:~~-·-~~~!~~I 0-~ I NG H·~ ·;~TE~;~c~ --· -. 1 "' 1.... 06PCJ56 ·THOMPSON LACQUER co. $3tGfJ2.68 PAINT SUPPLIES I:' ' )'-. _.: -o6l:J957 ______ TROR--TEP.PCR"ARY-"STRVTCES____ -s11u-;75-TEHPlmARV -ffnp-·-·------------·-·------·--·--·----· ·--·--·--.. ·.,l oe.e%8 THREE H CC. $188.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES jJ l:~I! --· -~::~~:--------·~:C~~ 1-~--~~.~~~~br~~;~.!~-~~-~~~-·----. -----· --·---··-n ~~;t :~------·--------~:~~~~ P!~~~LI Es .. -·-·-·---· ----·-·---. . .. . .. -------·~;,' h 068561 J.G. TUCKER & SONt INC. $11623.73 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/METERS ~ ll'' 0££~%2 FRANK ULTIMO !101992.60 CONTRACTOR PW-112 ,. l1 ·! ---·oHc:i~:J ·-uruno-F7iRtEl"·-~·ER vn:r T2lf2";ttT DEL-1vERv-sERV1 cE-·---·-------------" l11l 068%4 UNITED STATES EQUIFf.ENT CO., INC. $577.37 COMPRESSOR PARTS .~ l:.l· ·--~~:~~~ --·------~~~L~~.!{~~ ~ ~~ c SUN·L y··co·.---·----... ---.. ·-------------::~t ~~ -·. ·--. ---~:~ v~~-p~-~ I ES .... ··-....... ------.. -· .. -·---~ " Of.8967 VAUGHAN'S INDUSTRIAL REPAI~ CO USO.OD MACHINE REPAIRS ' ': ! 06~96A CARL W~~REN & CO. $38.50 LIABILITY CLAiHS ADMINISTRATOR :~ "' -----·oE.·ai;;b9--·--·---\fAUKESHrENG'INE""SERV'I Cf'NHR ______ -------------· n 973·2;9r------ENG I N£-·PARTS" ---· -·-----·-------------····---------1.\1 . f"; 068970 l,.IEATHER & •HND INSTRUMENTS $1J88.85 SAFETY SUPPLIES I:: \ !~'.,1 --·--~~::~-~-·-·---~~~ii~~H~.~~~-·:1:~-~~.r.~-·to~v---------··---·· ----·· -·-·····--·-----· !·~~ ~ ::j~-.... ·-·-····· ~n~~:~ c~~P~~~~~ IE S ..... . . . . . .. . ·-... ----------1'··~1 ii ~I II [1·····-·--···-··· . ------·--·-··-···-----·-··-··-··-··-·····--··---·-·-·····-·----·--·-···---··--·---:··-·-·---········-·-·-··--··-·---·-···-·-······-·--·-··------.... --. ··--····-·-·-···---·-. -·····--·------· -·----------;: I I •1 • "'r 1•.IUI . ·~·!.. ···············--··( ---·-·-·-··-····--·---····-·· -·-·-·· ...... , ... ·······-;, ·-···-·.,··· ······-.... _ ·······( ········ .... _. ! .. ( . ·--.. -··· .• r, ( ( ( FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 't/?6/8'1 rAGr 5 r; r--------c OUN TY s AN I u; I ON o Is TR I c Ts OF DR A NG [ ~~~·;mnm E'lfAl"IO -m·-··-~--.. ·--·---1 :1 l 11:1,· --w~~~~N~--~~-:-·-----------·--;~~~-~·;·----·-----------------~l!_IH5__~-~!:~~~:_(J~t_a•_ . -------.. --. -~E~~~;~T ;~N . -----.. J;I . I~ . . . I ,~. --on975 WAI I Et F rnr-&·-vrRVTLLE ------·s-r;"'194-;7u-----uEE'P--oc-E·AN-stuoG'EIJTS-PO"S-A1.-STUOY-·------------·-1 rl 06897'f WHITNEY MACHJNERYt INC. S257e5't TOOLS I"' !.i 068975 WILSON FORD SALC:S $55.65 TRUCK PARTS • '.'. 1;n1---····-·;:;6e91E_____ XEROX-CORF-;----------·--------·-----·---------------·-········ S39233~·a 1r-· --·---· --·--·xEROX"REPROOUCTION .. -··... . :1______ ----------------- ::! , .. I T'OTI"L'Ct1ffffS-P"A'TU-IJ 5 7 u 2 16 'l ST~'3"b.-'i:> ·-------·-----···------------------···-·· !.!, •!• I ----------------------------------H -·--·--.. ------------------------------·-----------·--··--··· ···------------------·--------·-··--------..... ----.... -·--·--.. ------·---······ ---·1i·:·;1 ,.,, '"'L 1··; SUMMARY AMOUNT [I ___ ------;~---~~~;~~~0 ____________________ s ____ 18 ;-~~~:-:~ ----·------- 1111~ #2 F/R FUND 8,063.00 In ... H 3 OPE R F UN D 7 , 6 2 1 • 2 5 I·'' r---713 -·p;cu-mR ----·--ra 1-;g-97:-J-2---· 1 11, \J1 # 3 F I R FUN D 7 , 9 1 0 • 0 0 .'I ---------,,, .. ,, .. ,., 1 :-: ,, ---------·-·-----------·-·------------,:: !:.:I .111 ::: # 5 0 PER FUND 9 7 4 . 33 H· · ----... -16-·oPER·-FuNir-··------·----------------------···· 20:38-------··------------··-· ·-·-······--·--··-------···· :-·l #7 OPER FUND 2, 7lt3. 21 i, .. I ''.I 1 i11! H 1 1 0 PE R FUN D 6 9 5 • 8 lt ur--------·-u5&6-0PE'RtUND -.--,"b-6').57 ___ _ ,/ 1 #5&6 ACO FUND 474. 32 11. H 6 & 7 OPE R FUN 0 1 6 • 8 7 -------------------__ .:n 1:, l.i-·--··--·--·JT--OPER-FUNo----------· ----·-----·--4-5z-03a·:·rr3-·--------------···· -·· ---·---· -· 1~1 CORF 623, 396. 22 .. . ... -j!;:1 ,~ SELF FUNDED LIABILITY CLAIMS INSURANCE FUND 38.50 I ) ---------snF-FONIJE'IJYURK£R~'OMr.INSlJRJ\'Rt'rFONO . . 6'-;1r6-Z:-8·z----- 'CI JT. _WORKING CAPITAL FUND . · 55,427.51 11'!--·-----·-----·-----------------··----··----------~---·---··-~~' --·--------------------·-.. --·-· ..... 1:·:l T 0 TA L Cl A I HS PA I D 0 5 / 0 2 / 8 If $ 1 , 3 6 8 , 8 3 6 • I, 5 F-------·---·------------------------------ r· :·:j ----------------------· ··1 ' .,, .,, j 1:::; '·'1 ---.... , ----------------·------~ -.... , . . ,, i11 '" 1:: r=t ------------ . .. ... . ·--·-. -. . . ---··· . --. . . . . -.. ~!::: ·---·---------------------------. ------:: -·---------------------·------------------------ ( 1l ----·-· ---- '::1 ' ''·• 4f 1:::·1 ·,;.rj . -··-.. -···-·· .. ··--···~--·._-------·-----··--··-------·--··-·- .. ''· .. , .. ------···r .. ·~l --·-·--------:;Ii . ,,. I. " .... :t 'i 'i 1 l 'I I I Ii :-: l:..ct I (-1 ::: FUND NC \.!AP.RANT NO. OE-8998 068999 069000 069001 06qoc2 OE 9 003 H9001f C69G05 ~69COE- 06cH!07 069(10A 0611009 il6901CI 069(lll 069012 OE-9013 G6901'f 069015 069016 069017 069(110 (16_9019 06q020 069021 {169022 fJ65CJ23 Of.9024 Cb9u25 069026 069027 fJ6C:02A 069029 069030 Ci69031 0(19032 DE-9033 065034 Cf,9035 ll69Ct~6 065tl37 06%38 l.169&3'J 06%40 ~6c; Olf l CE-9042 !lt 90'13 ( 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DAT[ 5/11/8'1 FAG( REPORT NUMBER APlfJ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR R.r. ADAMS COMPANY AIR CALIFORNIA AIR CONDilIONING SPECIALTI[S AIR PRODUCTS & CHfHJCALStlNC. ALL-STATE V[HJCLESt INC. AMERICAN AIR FJLTERt INC. AMERICAN COMPRESSOR CO AMERICAN LOCK & SUPPLY, INC. THE ANCHOR PACKING CO• AQUA BEN CORP• ARROW-RISCO, INC. ASSOCIATED LA~ORATORIES RALPH w. ATKINSON BAKER PLYMOOO co., INC. KAREN BROWN eARFOOT EERTECH CLAIMS PAID 05/16/84 AMOUNT u.ua.2e S.356.JO $5,766.'tO $129.52 Slt22't.92 $368.81' $738.40 $'19.29 s1,922.01 $2lt6l'l.80 t607.26 $50.00 $2't.8lf UtOOS.59 S6t72Ue25 DESCRIPTION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AIR FARE VENTILATION EQUIPMENT SPECIALTY GASES VEHICLE LEASING · ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES COMPRESSOR PARTS KEYS PUMP PARTS CHEMICAL COAGULANTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LAB ANALYSIS SHALL HARDWARE SHALL HARDWARE, LUMBER FINAL DEFERRED COHP. PAYOFF ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1 BIERLY & ASSOCIATES, INC. BIG AOX RENlAL Cb. $81.87 $550.00 $950.00 $310.97 $895.49 $175.~9 WORKERS' COHP. ADMINISTRATORS TRASH DISPOSAL BOD'S AIR CONDITIONING RADIATOR REPAIRS LUMBER ELECTROMETER eUENA PARK LUMBER a HARDWARE AURR BPOW~ RES(ARCH CORP BUllER ENGINEERING, INC. BUTTERWORTH <PUBLISHERS> INC. C & R PECONOITIONING CO• S20t063.61 .$62.25 u.:soo.oo Slf16.38 $b39.10 VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, CONST. P2-23 TECHNICAL JOURNAL -INDUSTRIAL WASTE CPT CALIFCRNIAt INC. CS COMPANY CALIAGllAt INC. CAMBRIDGE FILTER CORP. APT CARR TRANSMISSION CHRIS CERVELLONE CHEMWEST INVUSTRJES, INC. BRIAN CHUCHUAS JEEP, INC. CLARK DYE HAROW~RE COA~T INSURANCE AGENCY COMPUTER la AVE CONNELL CHEVROLET CONROCK COMPANY CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. CONSOLJDAT£D REPRODUCTIONS CONT IN EN) Al CHEMIC AL CO CONTROL CABLES, INC. CRANE VEYCR CORP. CROWLEY E~VIRONHENTAL SERVICES CAL CONSOLIDATED WATEP CYCLOPS CCMF' ANY STATE OF CALlfORNii SS,999.80 $lf98.65 S397.8R isa5.oo s2.120.oo $8,93'1.00 $175.48 S189t503.00 uo.oo S3H.!5 $138.90 $3,913.83 Slt859.l't Ut998.10 $'19. Dlf S2t9lf7.50 $910.06 uoe.30 t90t1.CO U3J.oo ( PUHP REPAIRS WORD PROCESSING REPAIRS, SUPPLIES VALVES CONTR~CTOR PW-085-1 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS DRAFTING SERVICES FERRIC CHLORIDE TANK RENTAL 4-WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLE SHALL HARDWARE ANNUAL INSURANCE PREMIUMS COMPUTER PARTS TRUCK PARTS BUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION CHLORINE CABLE CONTRACTOR PW-104 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES WATER SOFTENER RENTAL BALBOA TRUNK REPAIRS ANNEXATION #112 PROCESSING FEE " ( j I I, I 1 I I' I I r I 1·1 'I I I 11 - o3 I (-...) :::: ( ( ( FUND NO WARRANT NO. 0690"'4 C690't5 0690% OE9047 (69046 069049 06qo50 On9C51 Of.9052 06 9 £153 06905/f 069055 Ol:~u56 ~69(:57 069'.158 069059 Oc90EO l'6%El 069062 065063 G6906lf C65065 065Gf6 C650f7 ('69068 06~(169 DE 9~7{1 C6Stl71 Of,5072 C6 9 ('73 Of:90H u67C75 C69C76 C6%77 Of:9078 069079 {,69(i~0 06'90lll 06~0l:l2 f,6 9 f:83 064'.iOB'f 06S(l8~1 069\186 OE-9CE7 C~90l:6 C6q06C: 9199 -JT DIST lJCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/11/B'f PAGE Rf PORT NUMBER AP43 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR DME, I NC• R. DALTON BCOKSELLER D'VALS SALES COMPANY DECO OE GUELLE & SONS GLASS CO. DELFHI SYSTEMSt INC. OE~·FAR SALES & SERVICE DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES OJGIOYNE COMPUTER S[RVJCES DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. DRIVER TESTING CENTER DUMAS DIESEL INJECTION DUNN EO~AROS CORP. E.O.A.w,I~C. & K.p. LINDSTROM EASTMAN, INC. FALCON DISFOSAL SERVICE HR & MRS C.E. FENTON FILTER SUFPLY CO. FISCHER & PORTER CO. FIVE STAR FISH FARMS FLEXIBLE FURNITURE DIVISION FLUID COMPONENTS, INC. CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY CITY Of FULLERTON GW MAINTENANCE, INC. GANAHL LUMBER co. GARRATT-CALL)HAN COMPANY GENERAL TtLEFHONE CO. GRAPHIC CCNTROLS GRIFFITH AIR TOOLS HACH COMPANY L4RRY HALL'S HAPSOR DIESEL & [QUIP.tlNC. HAPRINGro~ INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS HASTY ALIGNMeNT MICHAEL HEINZ HERTZ CAR LEASING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTO~ eEACH RUBE£R STAMP HUNTINGTO~ VALLEY lOOL IMFERJAL wEST CHEMICAL CO. INDUSTRIAL TtiRODED PRODUCTS IRVINE INDUSTRIAL LANDSCAPE IRVINE RA~CH WATER DISTRJCT JACK X CHANGE KAMAN BEARINGS & SUPPLY CLAIMS PAID 05/16/84. AMOUNT $lflfe85 $35.99 $387.85 $559.f"-17 sqo.63 $21200.00 S't21.13 S9t878.l'f S968.0D $22,773.4~ $56.00 $905.29 SltO't7.66 S933.'f6 S6il7.25 . S62t8~lf.90 $35.00 $427.55 S3,919.8't S61.20 S5t327.52 S3t450.9't $663.18 SlG7.91 $27.GO S766. H $2tl06.lf4 s2,111.s1 $214.89 $208.91 $95.29 uoa.10 s21.11 SH.73 $102. 00 S:H. JJ5 S327.5't S5t679.76 $350.2(! $133.33 S1'7'f 9. 56 $222.3~ S5t779.15 $4. ')0 U'f9.00 t31J3.62 DESC/HPTION FREIGHT ELECTRONICS MANUAL PIPE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES GLASS COMPUTER PROGRAMMING MODIFICATIONS ELECTRICAL REPAIRS PRINTING HINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE PLANT #2 BASIN REPAIRS DRIVER EXAMS ENGINE PARTS PAINT SUPPLIES EIR ULTIMATE SOLIDS DISPOSAL OFFICE SUPPLIES SLUDGE HAULING/DISPOSAL PERMIT FEE OVERCHARGE ENGINE PARTS PIPE SUPPLIES LAB SPECIMENS OFFICE FURNITURE FLOW TRANSMITTER WATER USEAGE WATER USEAGE TRUCK REPAIRS LUMBER SOLVENTS TELEPHONE DRAFTING SUPPLIES TOOLS LAB SUPPLIES TRUCK REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS SHALL HARDWARE TRUCK REPAIRS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE VEHICLE LEASING WATER USEAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES TOOLS FERRIC CHLORIDE SHALL HARDWARE PLANTS #1&2 MTCE., SEAL BEACH PUMP STN. HTCE. WATER USEAGE TOOLS BEARING SUPPLIES .. : : i --j ::: bj I VJ :-:: I ! t • ~ I : i ... FUND NO \.JtaP.RANT NO. 061?090 C69Cl5l 06'l092 C690S3 0690 94 069095 0691.'% 069097 (;f.9098 069099 t)6ql0!) 069101 C691\l2 OE. 5103 069104 06'1105 069H16 :'.169107 06~100 %9105 (16911~ 069111 06c;ll 12 069113 CE. 9114 069115 069116 069117 069118 (169119 069120 069121 n6c;; 12:? 06 9123 . C69124 06C.J25 069126 (l69127 Ci69128 Lf 9129 Of,913u (169131 069132 (165133 G6913't (165135 9199 -JT DIST UCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/11/84 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/16/84 VENDOR KAS SAFETY PRODUCTS KENNEDY/JENKS ENGINEERS -KING 8EARINGt INC. L & N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO L.R.w.s., INC. LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. LIFECOM-S~FETY SEP.VICE SUPPLY LIGHTING CISTRIBUTORSt INC. LOWRY & ASSOCJAT[S LYONS INT'L SECURITYt INC. MACK TRUC~St INC. MATT -CHLORt INC. MCCOY TRACTOR & EO~JPMENT JOSEPH A. MCDONALD MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY co. MORRISON SUPPLY CO. MYCO INDUSTRIES CITY OF NE~PORT BEACH OCCILENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE-CASHIER OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. OWL CR~NE & RIGGING COUNTY SANITATION DISTPICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PPG INOUSTRIESt INC. PACIFIC HOBILf. OFFICES PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. PAPTS UNLIMITED FASCAL & LUDWIG PATTfN CORP. PICKWICK PAP(R PRODUCTS POSTMASTER POSTMASTER HAROLD FRl~ROSE ICE RAIHOOW DISPOSAL CO. THE REGISTER THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. OF CALIF., INC. REXNORD ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS RlCHARCSON & LEAOUEF CO. RUSSCO CO~STRUCTIONt J~C. SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS SEtaRSt ROEBUCK & COe SHAMROCK SUFPLY SHfRWI~ WILLIA~S SILVER STREAK TRAVElt INC. SN~P-ON TOOLS CORP. AMOUNT $54.01 $19.255.32 $5,42le24 S3,822e89 $729.ll $216.IJ'f $439.40 $69.03 s3,a30.oo u,332.00 $90.27 s1,11a.39 $126.76 $6t2lt7.37 $342.65 $74.37 S3l'te9C $21.32 $4,187.08 $570.00 $26,934•37 $1,017.38 $360.00 $16,573.73 $633.88 $150.52 $309.62 $911.93 $82,0lf6.70 $319.36 $80.90 UtO!J\l.OCi $30.9q s3 o·. oo $334.00 $2,252.37 $85.65 Slll.23 $l9t't23.80 $86t206ell4 $18.02 un.73 $2t999.92 t.769.56 $158.00 $1.:37 DESCRIPTION SAFETY SUPPLIES ENGR. PW-061R-3 BEARING SUPPLIES UNIFORM RENTAL WELDING SUPPLIES ELECTRIC CART PARTS SAFETY SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ENGR. 3-24-2 PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL TRUCK PARTS PIPE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS FINAL DEFERRED COMP. PAYOFF SHALL HARDWARE PIPE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS WATER USEAGE · CAUSTIC SODA OCEAN MONITORING CHLORINE PIPE SUPPLIES CRANE RENTAL REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP FUND, CLAIM SETTLEMENT PAINT SUPPLIES PLANT #2 TRAILER RENTAL SAFETY SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS RETENTION P2-26 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES POSTAGE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE TRASH DISPSOAL LEGAL ADVERTISING PIPE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL REPAIRS CONTRACTOR 3-21-2R RETENTION 5-18R OFFICE SUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS/ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PAINT SUPPLIES AIR FARE FREIGHT (I ( ( 'i I. : I i i 1 I '' I ' I::! i' \ .. ! I , I I,.;. t1 .... .... t;:j I ..r= :: ( ( Futm NO \.J/IP.RANT rm. (169136 C69137 069138 069139 ~c91'iC {lf;.91 'll 0691'12 0691'13 0651 11'4 (l(,9145 OE:'.1146 06'?147 C69148 Of91'15 H9150 Oc5n1 t!E'?152 069153 06~·154 Ob9155 C69156 C691~7 IJ E 9158 069159 36~1H OC.9161· 065162 C6 9163 ~f:916't ;)f5165 li65H6 C6~lfl U69H8 069169 069170 C69171 069172 0691 73 06917'f 069175 G69176 9199 -JT OJST WCAKING CAPITAL P~OCESSJNG DATE 5/11/A4 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of OPANGE COUNTY VENDOR SOUTH COAST OFFICE F.AUIPHENT SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. SO. CAL. GAS CO. SO. CALIF. SOIL & TCSTING SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. ST AROW STEEL SCOTT STEVENS THE SUFPLI EP.S SURVEYORS SERVICE CO• J. UAYNE SYLVESTER TARDY ENGINEERING TENNANT CO. THOMPSON LACQUER CO. THOR TEMPCRARY SERVICES THORPE INSULATION THREE H CO. TRANSAMERICA OELAVALt INC. TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL TRAVEL AUFFS TRAVEL TRAVEL TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLYt INC. TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY J.G. TUCKER & SONt INC. UNION OIL CO. OF CALIF. UNION OIL COMPANY U~ITEO PARCEL SERVICE CLAIMS PAID 05/16/9't AH OU NT $219.'f2 $19,802.73 S6t299.0l $553.50 $377.36 s2,22a.es $99.M $977.21 $350.00 Slt183.lf6 $103.'t.3 $225.59 $658.03 sHo.ao .ne.01 $163.33 $18.16 $51684.78 s2,ooe.oo $240.00 $910.29 $219.57 $757e83 DESCRIPTION OFFICE FURNITURE POWER NATURAL GAS TESTING P2-25-2, P2-27 DIESEL FUEL STEEL STOCK EMPLOYEE HI LE AGE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, TOOLS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIHBURSEHENT PUMP PARTS ENGINE PARTS PA I NT SU p.p LI E S TEMPORARY HELP BUILDING HATERIALS OFFICE SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS ENGINE PARTS AIR FARE AIR FARE TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS ENGINE PARTS GASOLINE USE CHARGE OVERPAYMENT DELIVERY SERVICE " UNITED STATfS ELEVATOR CORP.· UNIVERSITY COPY SYSTEMS $69.33 S3t018efll $1t6.6lf $167.35 S2tl91f.2U s3so.oo $11035.119 $785.81 S.61. 6 c !422.56 $472.50 s21.20 S3e6.20 Slt572.16 $417.95 Slt060e00 $905.71 S591f e28 PLANT #1 ELEVATOR HAINTENANCE TELE COP I ER U.S. DEPT. OF THE ARMY VtJP. SCIENTIFIC VALLEt CITirs SUPPLY co. VALVl SERVICES, INC. VANirR GRAPHICS VARIAN/INSTRUMENT DIVISION VISICORP. CUSTOMlR SERVICE JOHN R. WAPLES WAUKESHA ENGINE SERVICENTER ~[STERN WIRE & ALLOYS WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES EVERETT H. YORK CO. TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/16/Blf $776t't69.02 ================= 2-2~ LICENSING FEE LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES VALVES OFF I CE FORMS ENGINE REPAIRS COMPUTER SUPPLIES ODOR CONSULTING EHG IHE PARTS WELD I NG SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES VALVES ENGINE PARTS ( . t1 J ...... ~ td I Vl ::: FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL SUMHARY #2 OPER FUND #2 F/R FUND #3 OPER FUND #3 ACO FUND #3 F/R FUND #5 OPER FUND #5 ACO FUND #7 OPER FUND 1/7 F /R FUND #11 OPER FUND #13 ACO FUND #5&6 ACO FUND #6&7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED WORKERS 1 COMP. INSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIHS PAID 05/16/84 ( PROCESSING DATE 5/11/84 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/16/84 AMOUNT $ 7.733.01 350.00 1,838.69 19, 831t. Its It, 206. 51 244.lto 87,106.04 2,926.09 35.00 lt,907.21 16.75 1t9. Ito 3,062.72 227,051.1t2 166,618.06 17,323.73 233,165.54 $776,469.02. ( ~· PAGE 5 ( ~ I :• 1· !· : L · ·! :: n I I-' :::: i, .I ( FUND NO WARRANT NO. (;69217 C6C:21h 01Sn111 l'!6922Cl 069221 069222 C6722~ f:6922'f 06C.225 Clf.922€> :J6n21 0(.'.?228 rc,9229 Of?230 r.692~1 r.6r:;232 069233 069234 069235 Ci6°23~ 06C:.237 ('fi'=i238 06':1239 f·6~2lt0 rtb~2ltl 065'242 (f, 9 243 r.69244 Oi.92lf 5 (1(,92" 6 C69L'.47 IJ(i '!£'lt p Cf.a~49 ljf,9250 f'(; 92!' 1 06~2~2 re c;i ?53 {:fQ25'f C69255 069256 (;69257 n6~25B CE-~259 (169260 t()9261 'Jf.C''262 919') ( : JT DlST WCRKING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATl 5/25/~4 rAGE fi[FORt tUMBtR AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR ACCU -SllDGl ACTICN INSTRUMENTS, INC. ADVANCED Cf FICE ~ERVICES AOVANCC CCNSTRUCTORS, INC. Alrt CALIFORNIA AIR FRODUCTS & CHEMICALSt INC. AIR PROCUCTS & CHEMJCALS,IHC. AIR SYSTEMS OESI~N SEMINARS ALLIED SUFPLY CO. AMEPICAN CYANAMID COMPANY AMERICAN ~CIENTJFIC PRODUCTS THE ANCHGH PACKING CO. ANGELICA RENTAL SERVICES AQUA BEN CORP. ARCG GLASS & MIRROP AREMCO SCirNTIFIC ARROW-RISCO, INC. ASSOCIATEC LABORATOPIES AUTO S~CP EQUIPMENT CC. BACON COOP Co., INC. HILARY BAl<ER eANK OF A~ERICA NT & SA ~EACH VALLfY SECURITY, INC. DON c. BEATTIE BECKMAN I~DUSTRIAL-r.r.r. HRHCH fLAKf., ~CFFJTT & TOWNE ~LUE DIAMOND HATERI~LS BOM~R HAGNfTO SfRVICE, INC. CK PUMF AN[ OEUAtERJNG CO~P. CPT CALIFCRNIAt INC. CAL-GLASS FCR RESE~RCH, INC. CAL-~EST INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS CLAJ~S PAID a5/30/8'f AMOUNT DfSCRJPTION s3q4.H4 TECHNICAL JOURNAL $~20.69 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Sl72.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES t ll 5 , 212 • 6 O .. . . . .. C 0 NT RAC T 0 R . P 2 :.. 2 5-2 $168.00 AIR FARE S260.34 SPECIALTY GASES it89.38 SOLVENTS $400.UO SEMINAR REGISTRATION S261.96 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ··-i2i425.5A ·-· ....... CHEMICALS·--. Slt524.28 LAB SUPPLIES $254.40 PIPE SUPPLIES ~125.0~ TOWEL RENTAL S3lt859.77 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS S6S.ij0 GLASS $32.44 ·--.. ----··LAB. SUPPL! ES $66.98 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES S400.00 .LAB ANALYSIS .. S70.3& .. TRUCK PARTS $125.08 DOOR $88.25 CWPCA CONFERENCE EXPENSES s 3 O. 09· ·--...... -·-TRAVEL. EX PENS ES S26.71 KEYS AND LOCKS s1oa.oo TECHNICAL JOURNAL S20Q.OO POTENTIOMETERS s1,110.co ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES S3,lf36.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES U 73. 84 .. . PAV I NG HATER I ALS S488.69 ENGINE PARTS CONTRACTOR PW-099 WORD PROCESSING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES .. ELECTRICAL "SUPPLIES ( CALIF. WEST HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING JOUN C/iROLLO ENGINlfRS JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEfRS SS7,61f5.P.9 $54.23 $509.'tlf st.72'3.92 $4 3 ~ 28 S3t120.93 Slt'H0.52 START-UP P2-24, O&H P2-24, ENGR. J-15 ENGR. P2-26 JOHN CAPCLLO fN&/GREELEY HANSEN CASE POWER & EQUIFMENT CASHCO, I~C. JOUN CASO~ CASTLE PU~LICATICNSt LTD. CHRIS CEP.VE'LLONf CHEVRON u.s.A., INC. WILLIAM N. CLARKE COAST FIPELJN( CO. COLE SCIE~TIFICt INr.. · s3,548.1~ $2,768.36 st.194.75 ~504.59 $90.00 $180.tlO 113.215.81 1.214.97 Ht916.27 $60.52 O&H,-TRAINING P2~23 TRUCK PARTS VALVES TRUCK PARTS PERSONNEL PUBLICATIONS DRAFTING SERVICES GASOLINE, ENGINE OIL CONFERENCE EXPENSES CSDOC #7 REPAIRS LAB SUPPLIES la ; • FUN() NO <1 i_; I ! lJ.6RR/JNT NO. :.:; :-: n I N .... .... ; .. l. --· u692f3 C6926lf Of.92f5 £16~2C6 l'6G267 36926P Ci6fj269 lib9270 (•f.5271 (lf.~::?72 Ufc;273 Cb92H (6~275 (;f 9276 flf.9277 Ofi9276 ('69279 Clf.9200 (lf52H fl6C.2f>2 (l6 ~-2 ~3 {.(,0 2f 4 .06~211~ r1c, «; 2 Of.. (lf.9287 %?2~E. u692£t9 f.E.0 2'?0 f"6 ';? 2 'H ('69292 C'69293 (,f.~294 069295 (;(. c; 2 56 0692«:17 %92«,;18 C6n59 Of~~ro Cll.53Gl (if,9302 OE-~303 "E:S:304 069305 lil ~ 3 (;£, (Jf.4?3t7 ('fiC1308 919q -JT OJST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/25/84 PAGE REPORT NUMAER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/30/84 YrNDOR COMPRESSOR & INDUSTRIAL ENGINE SUPPLY CONROCK CCMFANY CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. CONTINENTAL CHE~ICIL CO CONTROLCO COOPER ENERGY srRVJC[S COSTA YES~ AUTO PARTSt INC. MR. CRA~E CHARLES P. CROWLEY CO. AMOUNT $810.00 S383.76 $3,81'1.75 $1,537.0CJ $282.57 $997.l't $197.91 Slf76ell0 $298.71 ... $13,194.72 DESCRIPTION PUHP PARTS BUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CH LOR I NE -· CONTROL EQUIPMENT ENGINE PARTS TRUCK .PARTS CRANE RENTAL PUHP PARTS CONTRACTO~-pw=105 2 CROWN FENC[ 8 SUPPLY CO., JNC. CAL CONSOLIDATED ~AT[R STATE OF CALIFORNIA S36le65 $51.65 $357.2C: s2,ooo.oo WATER SOFTENER RENTAL, RESIN TANK EXCHANGE WASTE-TAX DHEt INC. o.w. CO~TRACTING CO. DAVIDSON CONFERENCE C£NTER TO~ DAWES DECKER INSTRUMENT SUPPLY CO. DECO OELT~ tLECTRTC CALCULATOR PJFILIPPO ~SSOCIATES OOR4DO ENTfRPRISESt INC. DUMAS tIESEL INJECTION DUNN EC~APCS CORP. EASTfA~, I~C. fNGINEERS SALES-SERVJCE CO. FEOERftL EXPRESS CORP. FIBERGRATE co~r. ~ICHAEL J. FILfCCIA FISCHER & PORTER CO. fLAT & VERTICAL CONCRETE FLO-SYSTEMS CLIFFORD A. FORKERT DONALO Le JOX & ASSCCIATlS THE FO~BORO COMPANY FREDERICK FUHP & ENGINEERING FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY, INC. GMC TRUCK g COACH GW M~J~TE~~NCE, I~C. HERBlRT L. GALLEGLY GANAHL LU~eER CO. G£~ERAL TELEPHONE CO. JERRY GO~DWIN ooucr, INC. THOH~S GR~Y l ASSOC., INC. GEGPGE T. PALL co. LARRY HALL'~ HALPPJN S~PPLY CO. S357.50 ... i'd. 0 0 Sle073elf~ $31368.38 $76.32 S126e llf Slftl26.57 $324.34 Slt256.lflf $277.96 i67.42. S5lf .OO $1,563.24 tit() .·5(1 .. $73 .14 $lf55.00 s2 •a9s. 9c: S3t556.75 $825.00 u 'flu 4 a··-. $262.2'1 S26.CO S38t250elC $28.57 S2t850.00 it 73.10 S6t5lf0.63 f.llt4't3e76 $198.00 S240e9'i 1-265.00 $2,112.11 TUBING CSOOC #2 MANHOLE REPAIRS CONFERENCE REGISTRATION --··· ·-·· CWPCA .. CONFERENCE EXPENSES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFFl"CE MACHINES OFFICE SUPPLIES PLANT #2 REPAIRS ·-·· .. ENG I NE REPAIRS . PAINT SUPPLIES OFF I CE SUPPLIES .. ENG I NE PARTS. DELIVERY SERVICE FIBERGLASS GRATINGS CONFERENCE EXPENSES. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CORE DRILLING PUMP.PARTS ENGR. 3-28R SAFETY CONSULTANT .... --·--nECTRlCAl-·suPPLI Es·· PUMP PARTS LAB ANALYSIS -2 1/2 TON TRUCKS SHALL· HARDWARE CSDOC #7 VAULT REPAIRS ·-LUHBER TELEPHONE TRUCK LAB ANALYS1s·· PIPE SUPPLIES TRUCK REPAIRS .. "PIPE SUPPLIES··- ( ( ~! ( ... ' ' .... ' .... . ' ; 1:1 i. ; . J i -... n I \..N :::: .. : ( FUND ~C 9199 "1ARRAl\T NO. 0£:5309 Of9310 n6~.311 (!69312 (!{1~313 Gf.':'314 06'?31~· ()61?~16 (16 ~~ 31 7 f:f.,9~18 (:6°319 U6932C ('6~321 C E.t; ~·22 (169323 06~3~4 Of: 5325 069326 Cl693a C69326 Ot-5329 r.6533(1 o6n31 tE-9332 06 9 ! 33 0693:!4 069335 flf, 9336 0693~7 H·933e f:l.53~9 065340 Cf.'::1341 cf5342 (jf~3't3 f f.<)344 !J(.1?3115 f:E.9.HG C69347 C693'18 (,6~ ~49 (t6CJ!~O ll6~3!51 06935~ ~6 9353 (lf,9~e.4 ( JT DIST WCRKING C~PITAL ~ PPOCESSING OATf 5/25/84 FA~f. RE~ciRT N~HBtR AP~3 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG[ COUNTY VENDOR HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS HOLHES TUTTLE DATSUN MR. HUB CAP CITY OF H~NTlNGTON ~EACH CIT~ OF hLNTINGTCN &fACh ~UNTINGTOI\ BEACH RUe&ER STA~P HURLfY ELECTPONJCS, INC. HYDRO GATE CORP. JSCO COf-'.P~f\Y IMPERIAL ~EST CHf~ICAL CC. INDUSTRIAL THREADED FRODUCTS INGRAM fAFER IRVINE SWEEPING SERVlCt KAHAN BEARINGS & SUPPLY KELLY rJPE to. KING BEARIKG; INC. KIRST PUMP & MACHINE WORKS KLEEN-LINE CORP L.e.\J.s •• INC. LA MOTTE C~EMICAL PROCUCTS LIGHTING CISTRifUTORS, INC. LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMM LOWRY & ASSOCIATES LYONS INT'L SECUPITYt INC. MACK TRUCKSt INC. MALEY'S Wl~LOW FRODUCTS MARDEN SUSCO MA~VAC ELECTRONICS ~~TERIAL hANDLING SUPPLY MATT -CHLCRt INC. f4IKE HCCARThY EUICJ<, INC. MCKE~SON CHEMICAL CO. MCKINLEY EGUIP~ENT CORP MIDLAND MFG. CORF. MINE S~FEl' APPLI~NCES CO. ~ONTGO~ERY ELEVATOR COMPANY MOOPE FROC~CTS CO. MYCO INDUSTRIES NATIONAL LUMBER SUPPLY OCCICE~TAL CHEMICAL CORP. CLYHFIC C~Ef.ICAL co. ORANGf COL~TY FAP~ SUPPLY CO. ORANGE V4LVE & FITTING CO. ORITEX CORP OXYGEN SfRVICf CZALIC CORF. CLAIMS PAID 05/3~/84 AMOUNT $670.02 $62.38 S33.92 Sl0.78 Sl6 t950. 00 SS'l. 03 S66.02 $783.00 $151030.lft t1,1~a.42· ·· $2't7.6fl $305.22 !249.00 $93.37 u,211.e3 ·u•61a.10 Ut910.Dl $636.51 si1.H $66.90 Slt198.08 ·siso.l)o Slfti,102.1r. u ,qin~. oci S:lS:J.87 S9R.36 $339.20 Sit 3 ~ 7 2 $96.16 Ut075.l\8 u5.c;o S.5,806.16 $4. 955. 5 (• S4t2::.o.oo S.556.lf' !328.48 S H1~22 S5'1.88 ~'+52.'tq $2,376.5~ S5,33~.~4 $78.fi'I u 3 7. 49 $183.81 $30.00 1115.0C DESCRIPTION VALVES TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS WATER USEAGE WARNER RELIEF II PAYMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL.SUPPLiES PUMP PARTS LAB SUPPLIES, SAMPLERS ~t~Ric f~L6Rli>~ . SHALL HARDWARE OFFICE SUPPLIES PLANT MAINTENANCE BEAR I NG SUPPLIES PI PE SUPPLIES BEARiNG suf>hlES PUMP PARTS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES WELDiNG SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ANNEXATION #29 PROCESSING FEE ENGR. 2-25, 2-10-lA, #13 FORMATION PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL TRUCK PARTS SHALL HARDWARE VALVES ELECTRitAL··su~PLIES CHEMICAL DRUMS PIPE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS CHLORINE ELECTRIC CART PARTS vAlv£s· · SAFETY SUPPLIES PLANT #2 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE REGULATOR.PARTS SHALL HARDWARE SHALL HARDWARE, LUMBER CAUSl .. I C SODA BULK CHLORINE TOOLS : VALVE SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES DEHURRAGE DRAFTl~~ EQUIPME~T REPAl~S ( ~ I ., . I I. •!l ,! .1· i ' ,;•; I .1 1· 1 :: (I I ..i::-::: . i ,,, ..... FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/25/84 PAG( ~tr~~t NuMati A~4l 4 COUNTY SANITATIO~ DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/3Q/84 WARPANT NO. VENDOR 069355 ('65~~(, {!693~7 (161?358 0~~3~9 06936(l Ol '3361 C-6~362 (i6C.~f:.3 OE.9364 C693£5 069~H oc,cci~67 (if:.9368 06936~1 069370 C-69371 GC-9372 '169373 &6'?374 Of ~375 0(-9376 (169~77 CJ6937S %9379 Oe'?.3P.0 LE-0 3(~1 f!69~A2 C6 9 ~·f3 (16a~p4 nG9~f.5 fl6~·3f6 06'?3e7 il653eP !i693ll'? \169390 li6c::91 C(,93q2 Of.~353 Cf.'3~94 ll6'339~ G65~H Ci6~~97 f!6S'39P \;69399 r.65400 ( .COUNTY CF ORANG[ CO. OF ORA~GE-AUOITCR CONTROLR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PPG INDUSTRIESt INC. PACIFIC MOEJLE OFFICFS PACIFIC SAFETY £UUIPHENT CO. PACIFIC eELL PAc-wnc PARKSON1 INC. f·AsCAL t 'LUDUIG PEGO SYSTEHS PER~A-CAL CORPORATION PICK~JCK FAPER PRODUCTS PITNEY . eO!riES POPTER BOILER SERVICE1 INC. POSTMASTER HAROLD PRl~P.OSE ICE RAFFERTY INlERNATIONAL TRUCKS RE-CY-KLEEN CORP. REU VALVE co., INC. THE REGISTER THE REGISTER THE P.tFUBLIC SUPPLY CO. OF CALIF, INC. Rtwrs ENGINEERING cc. f?EXNORC, INC. RICHARt•S HYDRAULICS R OOSON COf'P MJ\' JOSEFH T. RYERSON & SON, INC. SANCON INC. SANO DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS SANTA AN/l DODGE SANTA ANA ELECTRIC ~OTORS YVONNE SCH\.IAB SEARS, ROEBUCK & co. SEE OPTICS SERPENllX CONVEYOR CORP. SHAMROCK SLPPLY ~HErHERC ~ACHINERY co. H.C. SMITH CONSTRUCTION CO. SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY1 INC SO. CALIF COASTAL WAT[R RESEARCH PROJECT SOUTHER~ CALIF. E~ISON CO. SO. OL. GAS CO. SO. CALIF. WATER CO. SOUTHER~ COUNTIES OIL CO. srAPKLETTS DRINKING WATER AMOUNT $2t223.72 Sl09162D.OO $11383.84 $3 t686.A2- U50.52 S211ll7e06 S3'11).51 $219.42 S39t366.3li $347,93j.25 t-338. H SIJ51.31f $11240.fflf S75.00 u20.oo . S21!li>O~OlJ $60.00 $38.09 :i:40'+.Hl' $2t258.56 $752. 55 $129.36 $655.19 $599.96 $323.17 !451.f,7 $11068.82 $ jq3. 09 S85t'I08.3C $51J.(J(, !.259.R9 $'403.55 ua.1;5 ·-s 1 ~ i 7 8 • 6 7 1111.50 $'46lf.40 S311f56.59 f.'136.11 S3'lt!>OO.OO ·s39.35 Ul9t700.00 s 3 •l 9 , 2 o 2 • a a $2311i.19.82 Sl9.68 $19,\)AQ.99 S1,535.00 .. ( DESCRIPTION -.. PAGER HA I NTENANC E COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES REPLENISH WORKERS' COMP. FUND . PA I NT-SUPPLIES PLANT #2 TRAILER RENTAL SAFETY SUPPLIES TELEMETERING WELD I NG SUPPLIES MEDIUM-BUBBLE DIFFUSERS CONTRACTOR P2~26, pw~123 ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES . -... -.JANITORIAL SUPPLIES POSTAGE METER REPAIRS PUMP REPAIRS -·····--·--POSTAGE ..... - INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE TRUCK PARTS . -ENGINE PARTS VALVES . CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING ... LEGAL .. ADVERTISING PIPE SUPPLIES MANHOLE COVERS .. ELECTRICAL.SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS 'ENGINE REPAIRS .. ----·sTE El STOCK - CONTRACTOR l-2R-2, l-2R-3, PUMP REPAIRS OFFICE SUPPLIES .TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIRS EMPLOYEE MILEAGE ..... __ TOOlS ·--·-·-··-...... . SAFETY SUPPLIES CONVEYOR PARTS TOOLs.·sHALL HARDWARE TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR P2-23-6 ---PIPE "SUPPLIES DISTRICTS' 1984-85 SHARE OF SCCWRP BUDGET POWER NATURAL GAS WATER USEAGE DIESEL FUEL BOTTLED .. WATER •l •' ·, ( • .... I . i;:' ( . •' ( PPOCESSING OAT[ 5125/84 PAGf Rt~tiRt NU~BE~ A~~3 5 i• ll .. FUND llO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANeE COUNTY I'. ! ' 1'1 1' ,,.· 1,.I 1; :11 ::: n I Vl ::: '' ". l WARRANT NO. vrNDOR 0691t01 Cf.Y'tli2 fr~9'tG.3 069404 (16 c;4 05 069'1C6 G69H7 fl654C.8 0694(i9 065410 ~6C:411 H-?412 Of>C:lf 13 0694Jll 069415 067416 06CJ417 Cil:: ~'1 lfl 060.419 069'120 (·69421 1!61?4 ~2 Cl6C:'t2.3 065424 ('f.94?.5 069426 C.65427 Of.5428 069429 r.f,C1430 Cl6S't31 f)f '?lf ~2 SUPf.R CH£~ C.ORP THE SUrFLirns SURVEYO~S Sf RVJCE CO. J. UAYNE SYLVESTEP THOMFSON LACCUEP CO. THOR TE~PCRARY SERVICES TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE TRANSA~ERICA DELAVAL TRANSAMERICA DELAVALt INC. TRAVEL DUFFS - TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC. TRUCK!J/.RE J.G. TUCKER & so~. INC. ~.S. A~TO fLASSt INC. UNI LOC -UNJTlO PARCEL SERVICE - AL URSlC VWR SCIE~TIFJC VALLEY CITIES SUPFLY co. VALVE & STEEL 5UPPLY CO. VAREC, me. VARtAN/JNST~UHENT DIVISION C. K. VARhER co., INC. RJCHARD W. VON LANGfN WAUKESHA ENGINE ~EPVJCENTER ~fSTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP WILSON FORC SALES J.L. \..1Jf\G£RT CO. THOMAS L. ~OOD~UFFt INC. XlROX CORP. Y -TIPE GEORGE YARCLEY ASSOCIATES CLAIMS PAID 05/30/84 AMOUNT s712.32 S6tOO'l.S6 S27.9f. · s7oo.5o $899.75 S.:560.00 Uit't.30 !2tb63.35 $4,193.30 :£381~50 $1,892.83 u,060.oc i524.57 $33.92 $6lf5.9'f $37~ i 9--· ------ $30. fl(I $1,Br.17.82 :r.3.ii3.fi5 $298.0~ $138.97 ... s.6'>3;i9 $lt6'l.(l3 $140.'tl S·24il~77 $76.32 $83.4~ $1 ; h'3. 9 0 s11,001.oa s3,547.94 $59168.16 S.31J.30 TOTAL CLAIHS PAID 05/30/8'1 Slt6.37t768.90 ---------------------------------- DESCRIPllON JANiTORIAL SUPPLIES TOOLS/SAFETY SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT DRAFTING SUPPLIES PETTY·-cAsti RE I HBURStHENt PAINT SUPPLIES TEMPORARY HELP LOCKS &. KEYS ENGINE REPAIRS ENGINE PARTS AIRFARE·-·· TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS ELECTRiCAL SUPPliES TRUCK REPAIRS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES --i>ELi'\H:RV -SERV i tE .. CONFERENCE EXPENSES LAB SUPPLIES -p I PE-SUPPL I ES VALVES LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES. TILE CONFERENCE EXPENSES ENGiNE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS . PUMP. PARTS LEGAL SERVICES XEROX REPRODUCTION --tRutk TIRES VALVES ( -1 ·• •I I 11' .. i !• • ·.I I ~ ::: r> I en :: FUND NO 9199 SUHHARY #1 OPER FUND #2 OPER FUND #2 ACO FUND #2 F/R FUND #3 OPER FUND //3 ACO FUND HS OPER FUND 116 OPER FUND #7 OPER FUND //11 OPER FUND #11 F/R FUND #13 ACO FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #6&7 OPER FUHD JT OPER FUND CORF JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL SELF FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COHP. INSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/30/84 ( ' __ , •1 ... ritoC.E~S I ti.G. DATE . 5/25/84 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 5/.30/84 ........ .. $ AMOUNT 17.00 1,038.47 29,030.00 10,407.38 7,880.46 3,556.75 7,042.01 25.50 11,285.09 3,166.H 16,950.00 5,1toi..12 . 2,272.20 16.87 555,561.l,4 775, 726.14._ ---·---... 234. 00 1,383.84 . 206,_770. 29. --· ·-... -... ·-. -·--.. -...... . $1,637, 768.90 ( <JI ,;,- I' PAGE 6 ( • . JI .. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS II County Sanitation Districts Post Office Box 8127 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones; JOINT BOARDS Area Code 714 540-2910 962-2411 AGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS JULY 11, 1984 -7:30 P.M. DISTRICT 7 (5) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the ALL DISTRICTS City of Irvine re election of David G. Sills as mayor and seating him as a new member of the Board (20) (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 84-131, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Fabrication and Installation of Adaptor Spools for Meter Replacements, Job No. PW-132, to Floyd-Kordick, a Joint Venture, in the amount of $119,631.00, and rescinding Resolution No. 84-84 authorizing the General Manager to award said contract. See pages "I" and "II" (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation re Installation of Pressure Relief Bypass Around 10 Positive Displacement Primary Pumps, Specification No. M-016, and authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order DISTRICT 5 to Advance Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $15,810.00 for said work to comply with OSHA safety requirements. See page "III" (28) (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Notice of Appeal of small claims award to the District for user fee assessments filed on behalf of Robert C. Durkee, Case No. 178390, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action RESOLUTION NO. 84-131 AWARDING JOB NO. PW-132 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF <DUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE CX>UNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION OF.ADAPTOR SPOOLS FOR METER REPLACEMENTS, JOB NO. PW-132, AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 84-84 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3·, s, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, 00 HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Deputy Chief Engineer that award of contract be made to Floyd-Kordick, a Joint Venture, for Fabrication and Installation of Adaptor SpOOls for Meter Replacements, Job No. PW-132, and b~d tabul_ation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed1 and, '.,,.I Section 2. That the contract for Fabrication and Installation of Adaptor Spools for Meter Replacements, Job No. PW-132, be awarded to Floyd-Kordick, a Joint Venture, in the total amount of $119,631.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein1 and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, s, 6, 7 and 11, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work,. pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel1 and, Section 4. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. Section 5. That Resolution No. 84-84, authorizing the General Manager to receive bids and award a contract for said Job No. PW-132 for an amount not to exceed $65,000.00, is hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1984. II I II AGENDA ITEM #20(A) -ALL DISTRICTS II I II NO ADDENDUM B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T JOB NO. PW-132 PROJECT TITLE Fabrication and Installation of Adaptor Spools for Meter Replacements July 3 , 19 8 4 ~ .. ll:OOA.M. PROJECT DESCRIPTION __ F_a_b_r_i_c_a_t_i_o_n_o_f_n_e_w_s_t_e_e_l_a_d_a_p.._t_o_r_s_p_o_o_l_s_,_r_e_m_o_v_a_l_o_f ___ _ existing meters, installation of new adapters and inserts and construction of new supports. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE$ 65,000 __ ......._ ________ _ BUDGET AMOUNT $ --------- ================================================================================ CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID ================================================================================ 1. Floyd-Kordick, J.V. Redlands, CA ·$ 119 I 631.0Q 2. Advanco Constructors, Inc. Upland, CA $ 151, 402.oo \-.J 3 •. $ 4. $ I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a respons;ble bid. The low engineer's estimate did not sufficiently consider the unusually complex fabrication and installation effort and the limited construction schedule. I, therefore, recommend award to Floyd-Kordick, a J.V. of Redlands, California in the bid amount of $119,631.00 as the lowest and best bid. //) ft.t ~ . ~ M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer "II" AGENDA ITEM #20(A) -ALL DISTRICTS "I I" July 3, 1984 B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T PROJECT TITLE __ P_r_o_p_o_s_a_l_t_o_I_n_s_t_a_l_l_P_r_e_s_s_u_r_e_R_e....;l....;i;,..;;e....;f;..._,;;;S;...1Y_s_t....;e_m_i_n __ . ------- Ten Primary Pumps , Specification No. M-016 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Install pressure relief bypass around 10 positive displacement primary pumps. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE$ 20,000 --------------BUDGET AMOUNT $ -------- ============================================================================== CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID ============================================================================== 1. Advance Constructors, Inc. Upland, CA '>..,..) 2. C K' Pump & Dewater ing Corp. Long Beach, CA 3. Dorado Enterprises, Inc. Signal Hill, CA 4. Pascal & Ludwig Ontario, CA $ 15,810.00 $ 17,960.00 $ 20,470.00 $35,778.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low proposal is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend that a purchase order in the amount of $15,810.00 to Advance Constructors, Inc. of Upland, California as the lowest and best bid, and that the Board of Directors be requested to authorize same. If n. u~~ij~ "III" Thomas M. Dawes Deputy Chief Engineer AGENDA ITEM #28 -DISTRICT 5 "Ill" 1/1/83 POSITIONS AND SAIARIES JANUARY 1, 1983 MANAGEMENT/DEPARI'MENT HEAD POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS Approximate Monthly Equivalent : Annual sif ication Position Classification Auth. Range No. Hourly salary Salary MANAGEMENT 10000 General Manager 1 34.71 6017 72,200 10010 ~sistant General r-tJr. 1 31.39 5442 65,300 90000 Chief Engineer 1 30.10 5217 62,600 DEPARrMENT HEADS D0300 superintendent 1 1071F 20.52/25.52 3557/4424 42,682/53,083 10040 Director of Finance 1 1071F 20.52/25.52 3557/4424 42,682/53,083 D0150 Director of Operations 1 1071F 20.52/25.52 3557/4424 42,682/53,083 30(l1 '> D9puty Chief Engineer 1 1071F 20.52/25.52 3557/4424 42,682/53,083 -....,; 7 COU NTY SANITAT ION DISTRICTS of 0AANGEC OUN TY . C ALIFOR NIA P.O.BOX 8 127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE July 11, 1984 FOUNTAIN VA LLEY . CALIFORNIA 92708 (7 14)540-2910 (714)962-24 11 TO: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Joint Chairman Richard Edgar Proposed Management Performance Review Program/Deferred Compensation Plan Revisions By separate letter addressed to you from Director Gerald Mullen, he has expressed sev eral concerns with regard to the proposed MPRP. I believe the issues he raised are valid, but have, for the most part, been address ed in the Executive Committee's recommended program. Unfortunately , Mr. Mullen did not have the benefit of the Executive Committee discussion on this matter. With regard to the points raised by Director Mullen, the following summar y information ma y be of assistance in clarifying the program : 1) Board Control of Costs and Managers' Recommended Annual Performance Salary Adjustments a) The Boards will annually determine the salary range for the affected classifications in January following approval of MOU agreements with other employee groups. Any adjustment by the Boards of the top limit of the ranges would effecti ve l y se t a maximum cost which would be determinable at that time. Because the employees in the affected MPRP classifications tend to be long-term employees, they are now at the top of their salary range. There would not, therefore, appear to be an inordinantly high poten tial cost associated with the annual performance adjustment. b ) The MPRP has been modified by the Executive Committee in response to concerns previously expressed by Direc t ors to provide that the annual performance review adjustments be subject to the review of t he Execu tive Commi t tee. 2} Defer red Compensation Adjustment a) The proposed deferred compensation adjustment does r e present an immediate salary increase for Management /Department Head e mployees wh i ch wi ll be the only employees affected d uring t h e first year of the program. (A separate action will be r equired by the Boards of Directors next year before t he program would be implemente d f o r Assistant Department Head and Superv i sory classifications .) Memo to Joint Chairman Richard Edgar Page Two July 11, 1984 The cost of the proposed adjustment for the 1984-85 fiscal year is $875 over what would be projected for Management and Department Heads if the MPRP/Deferred Compensation Plan adjustments were not implemented, calculated as follows: 6% 5.5% $ 9,620* 3% $10,495** July '84 Jan '85 July '85 *Management/Department Head projected salary adjustment cost effective January, 1985 assuming that the Boards follow past tradition of approving approximately the same salary adjustment for these employees as have been approved for other employee groups. **Managment/Department Head proposed deferred compensation adjustment, effective July, 1984, if MPRP /Deferred Compensation Plan revision is approved. b) As you know, based upon the Executive Committee's deliberations regarding management organizational changes, when the transition has been completed next year, the top management staff will have been reduced from seven to six employees. However, to the best of my knowledge this has not been discussed with the full Boards. 3) Delaying Implementation of the Program a) The proposed program recommends a phased approach. During the first year, only Management and Department Heads (6 employees) would be affected. This will give us the opportunity of reviewing the program before it is implemente d for the Assistant Depar t ment Head and Supervisory classifications (23 employees). b) The MPRP is patte rne d afte r a similar program that has bee n used successfull y in the County. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN JUL y IL 1984 1) PRESENTATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO BILL VARDOUL IS 2) 301(H) WAIVER/NPDES PERMIT -As I REPORTED TO YOU LAST MONTH,· I TEST IF I ED AT THE JOI NT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECT I ON AGENCY-REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD HEARING IN RIVERSIDE ON THE DISTRICTS' PROPOSED 301(H) WAIVER AND NPDES PERMIT. You WILL RECALL THAT THE MAJOR CONCERN THAT HAD BEEN EXPRESSED AT THE HEARING RELATED TO THE EXTENSIVE OCEAN MONITORJNG PROGRAM BEING REQUIRED BY EPA WHICH WOULD COST OUR DISTRICTS BETWEEN 1 AND 1.5 MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR, WHILE THERE WER~ SOME TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WITH THE PROGRAM, WE ASSURED EPA AND THE REGIONAL BOARD OF OUR INTENT TO PROVIDE THE RESOURCES NECESSARY TO CONDUCT AN ADEQUATE MONITORING PROGRAM. WE DID, HOWEVER, REQUEST THAT AFTER TWO YEARS' EXPERIENCE, EPA AND THE REGIONAL BOARDS' STAFFS REVIEW THE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS TO MAKE SURE MEANINGFUL INFORMATION IS BEING OBTAINED, THIS COMING FRIDAY, JULY 13TH, THE REGIONAL BOARD WILL CONSIDER APPROVAL OF OUR PERMIT, IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE REGIONAL BOARD STAFF AND THE EPA REGION IX STAFF HAVE AGREED TO SCALE DOWN THE OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM SOMEWHAT, THE REDUCTION IN SCOPE HAS NOT YET BEEN QUANTIFIED BUT IT IS ESTIMATED TO REDUCE THE COST BETWEEN $100,000 AND $300,000, ONCE THE REGIONAL BOARD ACTS, EPA WILL THEN FORWARD THE PROPOSED -..._,; PROGRAM TO HEADQUARTERS OFFICE IN WASHINGTON FOR THEIR OK. THE .( ~~.r TIMETABLE, AS IT STANDS NOW, FOR ISSUANCE OF THE MODIFIED NPDES PERMIT AND 3Ql(H) WAIVER AFTER THE REGIONAL BOARD ADOPTS IT, CALLS FOR REGION IX TO SUBMIT TO WASHINGTON FOR APPROVAL BY AUGUST lsT; FOR JOINT SIGNATURE AND ISSUANCE BY AUGUST 28TH AFTER WHICH THERE IS A 33-DAY PUBLIC NOTICE PERIOD, THE EFFECTIVE DATE WOULD THEN BE OCTOBER lsT. 3) COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS -APPOINT OF IRVINE TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF ON DISTRICT No. 14 TO REPLACE BILL VARDOULIS (NOTE: IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE COUNCIL DID NOT APPOINT A SANITATION DISTRICT DIRECTOR LAST NIGHT BUT THAT MAYOR DAVID SILLS WILL BE ATTENDING TONIGHT'S BOARD MEETING), -APPOINT OF TO THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE TO REPLACE BRUCE FINLAYSON (NOTE: DIRECTOR DICK OLSON IS THE NEW DIRECTOR FROM MIDWAY CITY SANITARY DISTRICT), 4) SCCWRP REPRESENTATIVE -LAST YEAR THE BOARDS AUTHORIZED APPOINTMENT OF FORMER DIRECTOR JIM SHARP TO CONTINUE AS THE DISTRICTS' COMMISSIONER TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT CSCCWRP). MR. SHARP HAS BEEN PRESIDENT OF SCCWRP FOR THE PAST YEAR AND I WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND THAT THE BOARDS AUTHORIZE HIS RE-APPOINTMENT AS THE SCCWRP REPRESENTATIVE FOR ANOTHER YEAR BECAUSE OF HIS KNOWLEDGE, EXPERIENCE AND POSITION ON THE COMMISSION. VICE JOINT CHAIRMAN DON GRIFFIN IS ...._,,; THE DISTRICTS' ALTERNATE COMMISSIONER TO SCCWRP. 5) COMMITTEE MEET I NG S -ANNOUNCE THAT THE FI SC AL POLICY COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON TUESDA Y, JULY 24TH AT 4:30 P,M, -CALL AN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING FOR 5 :30 P,M, ON JULY 25TH AND INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING BOARD MEMBERS TO PARTICIPATE: ~ (ARREY NELSON ~'-');Ji)~ -TENTATIVELY CALL A MEETING OF THE SELECT CO MM ITTEE TO ADVISE STAFF ON DISTRICT No, 14 FOR 4:00 P,M,, WEDNESDAY, JULY 25TH, IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE EXECUTI VE COM MITTE E, STA FF I S COMPIL ING INFORMATION ON THE JOINT WORK S EQUITY FORMUL A AND HOPES TO HA VE IT COMPLE TE D BY THEN, 6 , WE WOULD LI KE TO REM IND YO U THAT A RETIREMENT DINNER WILL BE HELD FOR FRED HARPE R ON SUNDAY, JULY 22ND AT THE D 0 UB L ET REE H 0 TEL I N TH E C I TY 0 F 0 RAN GE , I F Y 0 U PL AN T 0 ATTEND AND HAVE NOT LET THE ST AFF KNOW YET, PLEASE CA LL DEBBIE LEAVE RTO N AT THE DI STRICT S ' OFFICE OR LET RITA KNOW BEFORE YOU LEA VE TONIGHT, 7 , SUMMARY OF EVENT S LEADING TO THE FO RM ATION OF DISTRICT No . 13. <RE : DI STRICTS Nos. 2 AND 7 AGENDA ITEMS 33, 34 & 35) <S EE ATTACHED SEPARATE REPORT) JUL y 1 L 1984 DISTRICT NO. 13 FORMATION SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM NO. 33, 34 & 35 AGENDA ITEM No. 33 IS THE BEGINNING OF THE CULMINATION OF THE FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 13. IT IS A RESULT OF A NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT BETWEEN OUR DISTRICTS AND THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO SETTLE THE ISSUE OF PROPERTY TAX EXCHANGES FOR NEWLY ANNEXING PROPERTIES THAT STARTED OVER FOUR YEARS AGO, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE NEWER DIRECTORS, I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE A MINUTE AND BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE WHY DISTRICT No. 13 IS BEING FORMED. DISTRICT No. 13 WILL BE COMPRISED OF APPROXIMATELY 24,000 ACRES PRESENTLY OUTSIDE SANITATION DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, TO THE NORTH AND EAST OF EXISTING DISTRICTS Nos. 2 AND 7. THE AREA IS TRIBUTARY TO DISTRICTS Nos. 2 AND 7 AND WAS ORIGINALLY MASTER-PLANNED TO ANNEX TO THOSE DISTRICTS AS THE PROPERTY DEVELOPED, HISTORICALLY, AS TERRITORY ANNEXED TO AN EXISTING SANITATION DISTRICT, THEY WERE CHARGED AN ANNEXATION ACREAGE FEE AND A CONNECTION FEE TO PAY FOR THE SEWERAGE FACILITIES TO SERVE THE PROPERTY, THE PROPERTIES WERE THEN PLACED ON THE TA X ROLL OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS AND THE YEARLY AD VALOREM TAX WAS USED TO PAY FOR ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS, HOWEVE R, AFTER THE ADOPTION OF PROPOSITION No. 13, THE STATE LEGI SLATU RE ENACTED SEVERAL MEASURE S TO PROVIDE FOR I MPLEMENTATION -, OF THAT INITIATIVE. THESE INCLUDED AB 8 IN 1979 AND SB 180 IN 1980. THESE TWO MEASURES BASICALLY REQUIRE THAT THE AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES MUST NEGOTIATE AN EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAXES WHEN PROPERTY ANNEXES TO AN ADDITIONAL AGENCY. THE COUNTY, BEING THE MAJOR TAX RECIPIENT IN THE AREA WHICH IS ESSENTIALLY UNDEVELOPED TERRITORY, WAS RELUCTANT TO GIVE UP ANY OF THE PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO THE SANITATION DISTRICTS. THEIR LONG-RANGE FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS INDICATE A FUNDING SHORTFALL FOR SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED AND FOR WHICH THEY WOULD HAVE LIMITED ABILITY TO RAISE MONEY FROM OTHER SOURCES; WHEREAS, THE DISTRICTS HAVE THE ABILITY TO LEVY A USER FEE FOR SEWERAGE SERVICES. AFTER NEGOTIATING THE ISSUES FOR MORE THAN TWO YEARS, THE ._.. DISTRICTS' BOARDS AND THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGREED TO A SETTLEMENT WHEREIN WE WOULD FORM A NEW SANITATION DISTRICT, No. 13, TO SERVE THE TERRITORY THAT WOULD HAVE OTHERWISE BEEN ANNEXED TO DISTRICTS Nos. 2 AND 7. DISTRICT No. 13 WILL FINANCE ITS CAPITAL FACILITIES REQUIREMENT BY CONNECTION FEE REVENUE AND ITS ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COST FROM USER FEES, DISTRICT No. 13 WILL NOT RECEIVE A PROPERTY TAX EXCHANGE, HOWEVER, AS PART OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT, DISTRICTS 2 AND 7 DID RECEIVE A ONE-TIME PAYMENT FROM THE COUNTY'S SPECIAL DISTRICTS' AUGMENTATION FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $350,000 FOR PROPERTIES THAT HAD BEEN TAX-ZEROED BY THE COUNTY. THE NEW DISTRICT IS ESSENTIALLY BEING FORMED FOR FINANCIAL PURPOSES, IT WILL NO T .. ~ , .. BUILD ANY FACILITIES ITSELF BUT, RATHER, WILL PURCHASE CAPACITY IN THE TRUNK SEWERS OF DISTRICTS Nos. 2 AND 7 AND IN THE JOINT TREATMENT WORKS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXISTING BOARD POLICIES, SINCE THE AGREEMENT WAS APPROVED, THE DISTRICT No, 13 STEERING COMMITTEE HAS BEEN MEETING TO REVIEW THE FORMATION PROCEEDINGS, THE COMMITTEE IS COMPRISED OF THE DIRECTORS REPRESENTING THE CITIES THAT WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE NEW DISTRICT'S BOUNDARIES (ANAHEIM, BREA, ORANGE AND YORBA LINDA), THE COUNTY SUPERVISOR AND MYSELF AND THE VICE JOINT CHAIRMAN REPRESENTING THE JOINT BOARDS. THE COMMITTEE HAS SUBMITTED A SEPARATE INTERIM REPORT WHICH WAS MAILED WITH THE AGENDA MATERIAL FOR DIRECTORS OF DISTRICTS 2 AND 7 WHICH INCLUDED THE REQUIRED ENGINEER'S REPORT AND EIR AND DETAILS OF THE FINAL RECOMMENDED FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS FOR DISTRICT No. 13. THE SAME REPORT WAS SENT TO ALL OTHER DIRECTORS BUT WITHOUT THE FULL TEXT OF THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND EIR . THE FORMATION PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN FILED WITH LAFCO AND ITEMS 33, 34 AND 35 APPEARING ON THE AGENDA ARE THE NEXT STEPS REQUIRED IN THE PROCEEDINGS, THE STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS ADOPTION OF THESE ITEMS BY THE BOARDS OF DISTRICTS 2 AND 7, MEETING DATE July 11, 1984 DI STRICT l TIM~ 7:30 pm DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 & 11 i:\'-t" JOINT BOARDS l CRANK) I I • ~ I I ·• I HANSON I I I • I I .,,,, ± -- LUXEMBOURGER) ,GR I SET I I I. I • ....,-. -- KENNEDY),,,,, ,SALTARELLI •• ~ ____ WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,_~---_Q:l_ ____ DISTRICT 2 (MAC ALI .. I STER>. BA I LEY I I • • • • v (RISNER},,,,,,,BROWNELL,.,,::::E:: -- (NEWTON),,,,,,,-B+JEofEa,,,,,,,,~ - (NORBY)'. I ••• I I C!ATL Ill Ft. I I·~ = (NELSON} I • I • I •• COOPER. • • • • • ......., (PERRY),,,,,,,,CULVER,,,,,,~ = (KENNEDYJ,,,,,,EDGAR,,,,,,,~ (MURPHY),,,,,,,WEDAA,,,,,,, 0-~ ____ (SEIDEL),,,,,,,FRESE,,,,,,,~:::::: !OVERHOLTJ,,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,,~ ! ____ (OAVIS},,,,,,,,GRIFFJN,,,,, ........--__ _ NEWTON},,,,,,,"8'tt'e'IC',,,,,,,,~ ____ (LUXEMBOURGERJ,GRISET,,,,,,-':::::::. NORBY),,.,,,,,eATLilt-.,,.,,~ _ (CRANK),,,,,,,,HANSON,,,,,,~ == NELSONJ ••••• ,.coOPER •••••• ~ ----(MAURERJ,, ••••• HART •••••••• ~ -(LUXEMBOURGERJ,GRISET,,,,,,.J::::: ____ lMAHONEYJ,,,,,,HOLMBERG,,,, ..,.,,.,,.. __ _ (MAHON~Y),,, •• ,HOLMBERG,,,,~ .::/.__ ____ ODLUM),,,,,,,,KAWANAMI,,,,~ __ __ lODLUM I I •••• I ,KAWANAMI I I.·~ ..::J__ -PARTIN)J I. I I ••• M~LLEHr. •• I·~ - CULVERJ,,,,,,,PERRY,,,,,,,~ ____ ~COOPERJ,,,,,,,~LSBN-.,,,,,~ ____ ADLER ,,,,,,,,NEAL,,,,,,,,~ i ____ ADLER ,,,,,,,,NEAL,,,,,,,,~ ___ (BEYER)' ••••••• SMITH •••• I I. -u-~~FINLAYSONJ •• ' .OLSON, •••••• .,,,,-- (WIEDERJ I ••• I •• STANTON ••• I.~ ~O'C. Ml:& At,JSTERJ .PATTJ14!01t, I.~ - CULVER ,,,,,,,PERRY,,,,,,,~ --- DISTRICT 3 (HEATHERJ t I. I •• PLUMMER •• I •• ~ -!OVERHOLTJ,,,,,ROTH,,,,,,,,~ (PARTIN) I I. I I I ,MtjtLElth •••• ~ ~ ---KENNEDY) •• I I I I SALTARELLI.·~== RISNER) I I I •• I I BROWNELL. I I I V"' :J__ -) •• I I •••• s ILLS. I I •• '. ---NORBY) •••••••• eATtm •••••• ::E:: J__ _ BEYER),,,,,,,,SMITH,,,,,,, _ PERRY)t•··~···CULVER,,,,~·.-!::::.. ..:J___ ____ WIEDERJ,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,, ____ SEIDELJ,,,,,,,FRESE,,,,,,,~ .:/___ ____ !LANDER),,,,,,,SYLVIA,,,,,,~ __ DAVIS),,,,,,,,GRIFFIN,,,,,~ 1 ____ MANDIC),,,,,,,THOMAS,,,,,,~ ~· LUXEMBOURGERJ,GRISET,,,,,,.-J::::::: -Y--____ GREEN/SMITHJ,,WAHNER,,,,,, ....-_ (MAHONEY), I I I. iHOLMBERG •• 11~ _:t__ --(MURPHY), I I I I •• WEDAA. I •.• I I .:E - (ADLER),,,,,,,,NEAL,,,,,,,,-lia=:. :f: ____ (SIRIANIJ,,,,,,WEISHAUPT.,.~ _ (COOPER) I' I I. I' NELBSH. I. I I·~ --- (FINLAYSON) OLSON1~·~h~'-lc:: ~ ~ !OVERHO!T),,,,,ROTH~~ •• ~ ~ ___ WIEDER ,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,CC:.-~ __ LANDER ,,,,,,,SYLVIA,,,,,,...!:::::..:/____ MANDIC ,,,,,,,THOMAS,,,,,,~..:/___ ____ (SIRI'ANI} I. I I I .WEISHAUPT I I·~ .L---- DISTRICT 5 ! MAURER) t • ·• I • I I HART I I • I I I •• ~ y ---- HEATHER J.,, ••• PLUMMER ••••• ~ YA.,, ____ WIEDER),,,,,,,STANTON,,.,,~ ___ ·--- DISTRICT 6 !SMITH)~•••••••WAHNER,,,,,, ~ :::fr-_ MAURER ,,,,,,,HART,,,,,,,,~ ...z.__ __ _ WIEDER ,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,..Q._ ~ __ _ DISTRICT 7 (BEYER),,,·,,,,~SMITH,,,,·,,,~ t-_ (MAURERJ,,,,,,,HART,,,,,,,,~ ______ _ (KENNEDYJ,,,,,,EDGAR,,,,,,,--5=:::: _:t.__ --- (LUXEM80URGER),GRISET,,,,,,-!::::. _:{__ ___ ( ) ' I I I • I I Is [ LLS. I I • I I • .,._. ___l__ -(WIEDERJ,,,,,,,STANTON,,,,,~ ~--- (GREEN),,,,,,,,WAHNER,,,,,,~ ~ __ __ DISTRICT 11 ~ 7/11/84 illEE: OTHERS: HlltftPER. I I I I·-- SYLVESTER,,,~----CLARKE,,,,,, ____ _ DAWES,,,,,,, ____ ____ ANDERSON I I I ·~ - BUTLER,,,,,,~ ____ BROWN,,,,,,,-':::::: ____ BAKER,,,,,,, _____ KYLE••••••••.-!::::. ____ YOUNG,,,,,,, ______ _ JW,~NGEN ~= QAJ ~We----- WOODRUFF •••• ~ __ _ HOHENER,,,,,....!:::=:: _ HOWARD,,,,,, ______ __ HUNT,,,,,,,, ____ ____ KEITH, I I. I I .:.,,z: -KNOPF,,,,,,,.,,._,,,,. LE BLANC,,,,::::= LINDSTROM,,, ____ ___ LYNCH,,,,,,, ____ ---- MARTINSON I I. PEARCE ••• I •• z-= ~.'~.~~ \\; ·~ ~~oQ\;' Lw JULY 11, 198 4 JOINT MEETING NOTES #3 -Election of District 3 Chairman Inasmuch as the current District 3 Chairman, Bruce Finlayson, will an active Director , nominations were opened for a new Chairman . Roth was nominated . No further nominations. The Chair cast a unanimous #4 -Recognition of persons who wish to be heard • The Chairman recognized Eric Eklund from Electrolurgy , Inc . who wished to speak later in connection with Agenda Item No. 38 . Richard Friedrich was also recognized and requested that he be allowed to address the Board relative to the Districts' permitting policy. Chairman Edgar stated that he could speak between Agenda I tems 14 and 15. The Joint Chairman also recognized new Director David Sills from Irvine and Dick Olson from Midway City Sanitary District who had been serving as an alternate Director for the past 6 months . He a l so announced that Bob Mandie had been appointed to serve as Ron Pattinson 's alternate in District 11 for this only in order that the District would hnve a quorum. Mr . Edgar also acknowledged that Director Chris Norby was present for Buck Catlin . #7 -Election of Joint Chairman Director Richard Edgar had previously been nominated for Joint Chairman . moved that nominations be closed. Elected unanimously. #8 -Election of Vice Joint Chairman Director Don Griff in was nominated. unanimously. Mo v ed tha t nominations be closed . #9(a) -Report of the Joi n t Ch airman Joint Chairman Edgar apologized to Wayne Sylvester for not announcing after the closed session at the June Board Meeting that he had been appointed General Manager . Said they were very pleased and proud of Wayne but neglected to repeat that when the Board returned to open session. (1) Chairman Edgar then presented a resolution of commendation to retired Di rector Bill Vardoulis . Bill thanked the Directors and said he appreciated working with the staff at the Districts and that they were the cream of the crop. He said the staff and Directors ·were doing good work and have made the Districts one of the few governmental bodies that has progressed . (2) Mr. Edgar reported on the 30l(h) Waiver/NPDES Permit . He stated that as reported to Directors last month, he had testified at the joint EPA-RWQCB hearing in Riverside . The major concern that had been expressed at the hearing related to the extensive ocean monitoring program being required by EPA which would cost our Districts between 1-1.5 million do llars a year . While there were some technical difficulties with the program, we assured EPA and the Regional Board of our intent to provide the resources necessary to conduct an adequate monitoring program . We did, however, request that after two years• experience, that EPA's and the Regional Board's staffs review the program requirements to make sure meaningful information is be ing obtained . -· .· I '> j r , I I Chairman Edgar repor t ed further that that coming Friday , July 13th, the Regional Board would consider approval of the Distr i cts' permit. It is our understanding that the Regional Board's staff and the EPA Region IX staff have agreed to scale down the ocean monitoring program somewhat. The reduction in scope has not yet been quantified but it is estimated to reduce the cost between $100,000 and $300,000. When the Regional Board acts, EPA will then forward the proposed program to their headquarter's office in Washington for their okay. The timetable, as it stands now, for issuance of the modified NPDES Permit and 30l(h) Waiver, after the Regional Board adopts it, calls for Region IX to submit to Washington for approval by August 1st; and for joint signature and issuance by August 28th, after which there is a 33-day public notice period. The effective date would then be October 1st. r .. (3 ) The Joint Chairman then indicated that there was an opening on the Select Committee to Advise the Staff due to the retirement of Bill Vardoulis. He stated that it would be filled by the City of Irvine representative. He announced that David Sills is the new mayor in Irvine and was attending this meeting, but he has not yet appointed an alternate to serve on the District's Board. ...! ...... ..., Mr. Edgar reported that there is also a vacancy on the Fiscal Policy Committee ll ...... as Director Finlayson is no longer an active Director. He said he wished to think about that appointment a little and would advise the Board at the next meeting re that position. (4) Re SCCWRP Representative, Chairman Edgar advised that last year the Boards authorized appointment of former Director Jim Sharp to continue as the Districts' Commissioner to SCCWRP. Mr. Sharp has been President of SCCWRP for the last year and Chairman Edgar said he would like to recommend that the Boards authorize his re-appointment as the SCCWRP representative for another year because of his knowledge, experience and· position on the Commission . Vice Joint Chairman Don Griffin is the Districts' alternate Commissioner. It was so moved, seconded and carried. (5) The Joint Chairma n announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee would meet on Tuesday , July 24th at 4:30 p.m. He also called an Executive Committee meeting for 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, July 25th, and invited Directors Jim Neal and Dick Olson to attend. ~ Mr. Edgar tentatively called a meeting of the Select Committee to Advise Staff on District No. 14 for Wednesday, July 25th, at 4:00 p.m., immediately preceding the Executive Committee meeting. He said staff is compiling information on the Joint Works equity formula and hopes to have it completed by then. (6) Chairman Edgar reminded the Directors that a retirement dinner will be held for Fred Harper on Sunday, July 22nd, at the Doubletree Hotel in the City of Orange. (7) With regard to the formation of District No. 13, the Chairman reviewed the summary of events leading to said formation for the benefit of the newer Directors. He stated that initially, this came about because of the inequities in taxes after Proposition 13. We tried to achieve the same kind of tax transfer for property as we had in the past but the County said no. We had several years of meetings with the County. We finally decided to create a 1new District--District 13--and that District would have a user fee right up front. We tried to take all of the things that had been in suspense for the past 2-3 years, so we said if they pay $500, the interest on that fee would pay for their service. There were about 1300 properties getting service but we hadn't -2--. .. . ~·1 ..... • • I -• -.. . _., • -,,.r J II I . l I , .. ~. ~ • I { --c-"'t • ..... ~ - ..I 1' / . . • . & 1 I ,.. . ... • " ... ~\ I -· 11 I '1 • f I I ' I 11 ~'~•'' I ~ --• '1 • '"' I ' • I ·;\I ·-~ ,1 • .. I ., -\ :.1-1 I I . .J ~ • •• • • .'f •' ' . . J I --. .resolved the question of ad valorem taxes. Initially, we thought we could use money from the Augm e ntation Fund of the County but they had a different idea . In that time period from 1979-80, we continued to collect the connection fees for all those developed properties. They paid $3~ million which is now $5 with the interest. We determined to take some of that money from the people building in the Distri c t -$1/2 million -to make up the $500 property assessment . We found that there were 195 properties at $500 and put this into a fund to pay their operating costs . Have had Special Committee meetings and made some recommendations that will be acted on in Districts 2 & 7 later in the meeting. Said this will culminate on November 7th at LAFCO . They will be hearing this request in conjunction with approval of the spheres of influence for Districts Nos. 2 and 7. Subsequent to November the Joint Board will accept this and then • it goes to the Board of Supervisors for approval. Then District 13 will exist, probably will be the first of the year before final. Only Districts 2 & 7 act I •• r'> on this tonight but subsequent to November 7th, District 13 must be ratified by _ 'I the Joint Boards. ~ ~ --i9(b) -Report of the General Manager • Wayne Sylvester expressed his sincere appreciation to the Directors for their • .. -. L". I L l- .. vote of confidence in appointing him General Manager . Said he felt somewhat like following John Wooden as Fred Harper was recognized as perhaps the finest wastewater General Manager in the country. The recognition and stature achieved would not have been possible without the full and active support of our Directors, and the interest, willingness and hard work of each of them over the past years . The ballgame has changed in the last 25 years. One of the finest assets we have is our staff--department heads and division supervisors . As we move into the years ahead, one of his principal goals will be developing the staff to meet those challenges. Much of the burden will fall on their broad shoulders. He stated that with the continued support of the Boards and staff, he pledged to maintain the excellence that the Directors and staff have established and stay the course fixed by these Boards. -.. The General Manager then reported on the status of the research project re deep ocean disposal of sludge. On June 26th the House of Representatives passed .--I 1.-I lk~I ,r-I II their version of the Clean Water Act Amendment. We had met with Ron Packard and Glen Anderson and they were prepared to submit a floor amendment which would have approved the Districts ' Deep Ocean Sludge Disposal Research Project. However, they did not propose the amendment because we had not completed our compromise negotiations with the major environmental groups. An earlier agreement made June 14th between the Chairmen of the Public Works and Transportation Committee and the Water Resources Subcommittee and the environmental groups meant defeat to our amendment on the floor of the house if we did not clear the project with those groups. At this point, we believe we have only group to satisfy. If we do, it is possible that Senators Cranston and Wilson will be willing to introduce the Orange County amendment on the floor of the Senate when their version of the 1984 Clean Water Act comes to the Senate for a vote later in July. Mr . Sylvester briefly reported on the Supplemental Agenda" items. With regard to award of Job No. PW-132, Fabrication and Installation of Adaptor Spools for Meter Replacements, one the conditions placed upon the Districts by EPA for issuance of the 30l(h) waiver is that we update our metering. Last month the General Manager was authorized to award a contract not to exceed $65,000. We sent out specifications to 92 companies and only two bids were received . The low bid is considerably over the the engineer's estimate of $65,000 but it just refl ects the technical nature of building these new modifications for the meters. Staff recommends awarding a contract in the amount of $119,631.00. He also reported that the staff recommends award of the Specification No. M-016, Installation of Pressure Relief Bypass Around 10 Positive Displacement Primary Pumps, to Advance . He added that last month we had an accident at Plant 2 when I La. I I . i ~- ~ , '-i I I I -I :-J ~ .,.1 .. II ,•, II I J .. 1 '1 I they blew a sludge line because a valve stuck. We investigated our entire ... -3-••• . l • ' f r I system and discovered that we had 10 similar piping situations that had been installed 15-20 years ago. We sent out requests for bids to bring that piping into compliance with OSHA requirements. Re District 5, we are receiving and filing an appeal of a small claims award to that District for a sewer fee assessment. The District brought a small claims case against Mr. Durkee and the court awarded settlement to the District. Mr. Durkee i s now appealing case. JWS then briefly reported on agenda item #19 relative to issuance of purchase L orders to replace old and tired centrifuge equipment at both plants and • • ~ replacement of the belt filter presses to enable us to me et our water quality requirements. He reported that this purchase was negotiated and the total amount of the spare belts should be $43,884 instead of $41,184 for a grand total of $1,920,384 rather than $1,917,684 as listed on the agenda. The General Manager then called the Directors' attention to the goldenrod sheet in their folders. On June 30th the Districts finished their 30th year of operation. This sheet contains statistics which indicate how the Districts have grown over the last 30 years. #9(c) No report of the General Counsel #14(a) -Staff report re budgets Bill Butler briefly reported on the 1984-85 fiscal year budgets. to the tan report mailed to Directors. He referred Re District 1, primary issue addressed in 1984-85 is that we have sufficient operation and maintenance funds this year. We are proposing t he transfer of money in the capital reserve funds to cover operating fund. In 1985-86 will investigate a supplemental user fee to make up shortfall of operating expenses. In 1986-87 will not be sufficient capital monies. District 1 is the only District that does not have a connection fee. Re Districts 2 & 7, they are in outstanding financial s hape. Are proposing to transfer monies into the bond funds of these Districts to enable those bond funds to pay principal and interest for the outstanding indebtedness for the remainder of the life of the bonds through 1992. Re District 3, we are also proposing that we transfer funds from capital funds into bond funds to provide for principal and interest payments for 198 4-85. This will provide some tax savings to the individuals in District 3 as they will not have a tax levy for bonded indebtedness. • ,,. f Re Districts 5 & 6, we have instituted over the last few years supplemental user - fees to finance operation and maintenance programs. We are proposing in both Districts to continue with the current levels of supplemental user fees for 1 984-85 . Re District 11, their financial status is excellent at this point. We are proposing no change this year. Re Districts 13 & 14, pointed out that we have not included any funds for these Districts. In the event they are established, will set up separate budgets for them at that time. The budget for all Districts assumes that we will receive the 30 l(h ) waiver. With regard to agenda item #17 r e Gann appropr iatio ns, the budgets of all Districts a r e within the Gann limitations for 1984-85 . -4- _,.. - ~ I Chairman Edgar commente d that one item of interest is that for a good num ber of years we have known that there is a need for a user fee in Districts 5 & 6 and will be another in District 1 but it appears as if District 3 will probably have a user fee too. For the first time in the 5-year projections there is a negati ve cash flow and that is because the operating costs due to EPA mandates being are more costly than we even dreamed of a year ago. #14(i) -(Move to #20(c ) -ALL DISTRICTS Other Business ??) Chairman Edgar recognized Mr. Friedrich, owner of Brea Laundry. He stated that he had previously addressed the Board because he felt he had a certain amount of trouble communicating with the staff and his attorney had suggested talking to the Board. They originally thought the Board of Superv isors were the governing body of the Sanitation Districts and contacted them. The Supervisors made inquiries to the Districts in his behalf. Read letter from FAH to ? and letter from Tom Woodruff to Supv. Wieder's office. He said he had no way of knowing how may laundries there were in Orange County . Was told about 10 when he met with staff. He commented that these communications say that the Districts are about caught up with permitting the 1 million gallon users. He thought it would probably take about 20 years to get all of these laundries on a permit. He said he was the only one in north Orange County paying this. Felt he is entitled to a full refund. Should not have to bear this burden and have been paying it for some time. Chairman Edgar replied that we understand his situation. When he made his presentation three months ago, many of the Board members were not familiar with the situation. He then called on Blake Anderson to explain situation to the Board. Blake reported that during the 1950's the Districts adopted their first ordinance for industrial and commercial users. In 1960's made a few revisions. In 1970 established the wastewater division and started to permit industrial dischargers. In 1976 adopted a use ordinance which set regulations and defined user types for the first time. In 1976 went from looking at tox ic discharges to looking at hydraulic effects on the sewer system. Extended number of permittees to 250. In 1979 the Joint Boards adopted a Revenue Program for recovering charges for cost of treatment for both residential and commercial users. A summary of that is shown on Attachment 1 to the Executive Committee Report mailed to Directors. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act require that all user classes pay the proportional share. In 1980 we had 500 permittees. In 1983 the use ordinance was revised once again to come into compliance with government regulations. Set the cut-off for permitting people at 1 million gallons per year. In 1984 we now have 1,000 permittees. There are several recommendations in the Executive Committee package to expedite this. First, is staffing increase. Approved budget for 1984-85 will give a total of 7 office and 14 field people in the industrial waste department to implement the ordinance and continue identifying permittees. In 1970 had 4 office people and 4 field people. In 1983 had 5 office and 6 field people. Staff recommendations are for a significant. increase in staff to administer the ordinance. Also we a r e recommending that the cut-off for permittees be lowered to 750,000 gallons per year. We believe by mid-fiscal year 1985 we will have 2,000 permittees and by 1986 will exceed 3,000. Blake then reviewed the complex process of identifying a user and issuing a permit. We go through water companies, telephone book services and other informational services. Information received is still incomplete so we have a questionnaire that be completed. Have to check A.P . number and find out how much water they are actually consuming that never ends up reaching the sewer. With all that and after reviewing information, decide if they qualify or not. If not, we hold the potential user in our files and periodically recheck to see if there has been any changes. -· . 1 I' i - • ' .. • T - Have looked at several alternatives to see if there is a more effective way. Such as (1) search by zone . (2) search by type which he believed would be descriminatory against whatever group is chosen first or second, etc. (3) another alternative is to delay invoicing until everybody has been identified and put under permit. Federal Law is very clear that we require everybody to pay their fair and equitable cost and we would be missing some significant revenues for the next few years if we delayed invoicing . Staff's recommendation is to continue identifying and permitting with increased staff and to permit everybody that we believe to be permittable within the next two years. Referred to graph from 1976 -1983. Cooper asked Mr. Friedrich to identify more clearly the location of his business. He replied it is the Brea Coin Laundry. Cooper said he checked with City staff and they said there were 5 laundries in Brea. He suggested that possibly his machines used more water because they were older machines. Also said he had talked to the Districts' staff about this problem. He thought it would be simple to get information from various cities. Chairman Edgar explained the situation to him. Said what we have done, methodically but not with a huge staff, is have gradually tried to become acquainted with large users. Once the users are identified, have to analyze their ad valorem taxes and if they are high enough, they don't have to pay a fee. Cannot just go to all the cities because the water system boundaries are not coterminus with the cities. We have authorized the expenditure of some funds to augment computer programs, but perhaps the smaller water districts won't have computer programs. The expansion of our staff will enable us to be more expedient. Said it seemed to him that we have done a very credible job in expanding our program to cover those that need to be permitted. Don't have the manpower to achieve all information at once . Saltarelli stated that he had a little bit of a problem in not doing our search by type. By not doing this we are putting an individual business person at a disadvantage with others in the same industry. Therefore, it is discrimination. It would seem to him that the system we have in action now has been a good one but we have to go about the search by type so it will be spread out within the same business type. Should take a good look at those types that are big users by checking business licenses and then go to cities and water companies. Then everybody would be at the same advantage or disadvantage. Seems that there would be a reason to charge by type. Cooper added that he would like to make it perfectly clear that the cost of cleaning up the water has been mandated by the Federal government and that is one of the reasons why we have to collect for this cleanup. Edgar reviewed what the Executive Committee was recommending . He stated he didn't feel that we have been arbitrary. Are trying to be fair to everyone . Should direct staff to research some type of "type" usage . Cooper stated that in order to show Mr. Friedrich we care about his situation, he would like to keep him informed on what we are doing . Edgar agreed . ilS -Convened in closed session at 8:44 p.m. ~16 -Reconvened in regular session at 9:07 p.m . -. • I (1) Chairman Edgar announced that a motion was appropriate to approve the . . I Management Performance Review Program . It was so moved, seconded and carried . (2) Resolution No. 84 -132 revising the Districts 1 deferred compensation program for management employees, as recommended by the E.C., was then adopted. (3) Also adopted Resolution No. 84-133 amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, fixing salary for position of General Manager at $70,000 per year. JWS expressed his appreciation for the raise. -I -6--. • . - -. I .-r I -I 1 J u.,i" ... I .. •• -.. ..., M 1 .. I • '-.. • If ~ r , !I' l "' • ~ I • .... f I l ~ .... . , • • I le. • H I .. ..· .. . - I I • • ' "' • • .. • •• ..... -... . \.-J ·~· .. 4 r I I I ' 411t1 . J !I • ... .. • .. , • i 38 -DISTRICT 7 re Electrolurgy JWS briefly reported on history of Electrolurgy's noncompliance. Entered into an agreement with the District last January to provide for installation of pretreatment facilities to bring them into compliance by May 31st. They were unable to meet that time frame but have brought their discharge into compliance with interim limits. When their request was received for a time extension, we requested a letter of credit. Have now received that letter of credit and staff recommends approval of extension of time limit to August 7th. I '-:~~ JiiiiJlll I . J ,:.., .. , The Chair then recognized Eric Eklund from Electrolurgy. Said he appreciated ~-i I the extension but was very unhappy with situation. Reviewed some of their past ~1-t I problems including accidental leak and fine they had to pay which was reduced I • •' • from $12,000 to $4,000. Said he volunteered to put in this new type of system ~~ I • coming from England, which will benefit everyone at their expense. Said he t1 i requested six months to put in system and Sanitation District limited him to four months. The element was still in England. District employ ees told him that there would be no problem in .extending time if it was 80 % finished. As of this date no funding has been available and have had to use all their own money. He said the District has threatened and harrassed them so much that it has caused family problems. He added that from July, 1983 to the present time they have been in total compliance. Said they have been told that their permit will be revoked unless they sign everything put in front of them. He distributed pictures of the piece of equipment they are installing. Are 95% there. Just need electrical work done.· Have spent $75,000 and have had to put up another $20,000 for the District. Seems $75,000 should be enough and $20,000 letter of credit should be returned. Claimed the District has taken $30,000 from a ' -I • ..._ little family-owned company. • . • Tom Woodruff replied that the $20,000 is not a fee or charge, is simply a guarantee. Re this being voluntary on the part of Mr. Eklund, he indicated that hundreds of hours have been spent trying to resolve this with Mr. Eklund by his firm and our staff. He is an industrial discharger placing materials into the system and cannot do so unless they are pretreated. It is not strictly voluntary. The $20,000 is because there has been a series of reoccurring failures to comply with the deadlines. They had been ordered to have it done by May and they did not get done. The staff has not even fought him on that. Will concur with 'recoI'lll~endation to extend to August 7th to complete this. We had ·suggested that a surety bond be submitted which would hav~ cost a premium but wouldn't have tied up his money, but they said they could get a letter of credit, which is a more viable security for the Districts. If the system is on iine by August 7th, we don't see any part of the $20,000 . The compliance agreement signed by Electrolurgy states that any cost of enforcing the agreement ·would have to be paid by Electrolurgy. Those charges should not be borne by the other agencies. Said his office has put in 25 hours wor king on agreements. Industrial Waste Dept. has also spent a lot of time and the agreement stated that if the District incurred expenses, those expenses would be borne by Electrolurgy up to $7,500. We have presently used about half of it. Chairman Edgar added that the mandate .we have as a District is that we are obligated to comply with EPA regulations. Are all kinds of regula tions re treatment and grant funding, etc. We have to comply in a responsible fashion. When we made the agreement with you, we put in a whole lot of conditions to which both parties agreed and signed their consent to. Because of circumstances beyond your control, the provisions of that agreement have not been met. We are pr~pared to grant your extension. The letter of credit is for us to have confidence that this will be fulfilled. .. Blake Anderson added that original May 31st deadline was proposed by 1 ~ Electrolurgy, not the Sanitation Districts. The original request for an extension wa s to July 29th and our staff recommended that it be to August 8th . ~ Approva],. of the· extension was then moved, seconded and . carried. I • 11 I I : • . ' , -• p I .., ~ .. ... ,. I I ·1 ,.,. '-I ' '11 I . 1.: -= I JI. I I ., 'I .. • -7-.... •111-. .. "1.-- i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, ~' 3, 5, &, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE coum, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGUUR MEDING ON JULY llJ 1984 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS A VENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, was held on July 11, 1984, at 7:30 p.m., in t~a Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the r'-"' was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7 and 11 as follows: DISTRICT NO. 1: 'CISTRICT NO. 2: DISTRICT NO. 3: ~ DISTRICT NO. 5: DISTRICT NO. 6: DISTRICT NO. 7: ~ DISTRICT NO. 11: AcrIVE DIREcrORS x Robert Hanson, Chairman -X--Dan Griset, Chairman pro tem x Don Saltarelli _!__Roger Stanton _!__Henry Wedaa, Chairman x Don Roth, Chairman pro tern ----Richard Buck Buck Catlin x Sam Cooper -X--Dan Griset -X--John Holmberg x Carol Kawanami _!__James Neal ·x Bob Perry a Don Smith _a_Roger Stanton x Don Roth, Chairman Gerald Mullen, Chairman pro tern x Oscar Brownell Buck Catlin _!__Norman Culver .JL_Henry Frese _x_Don Griff in .JL_Dan Griset ....!.....John Holmberg .JL._James Neal Carrey Nelson x Richard Olson _!__Roger Stanton x Charles Sylvia -X--John A. Thomas x Martha Weishaupt x Evelyn Hart, Chairman x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem _a_Roger Stanton x James Wahner, Chairman x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tern _a_Roger Stanton a Don Smith, Chairman -X--Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tern -X--Richard Edgar -X--Dan Griset x David Sills _a_Roger Stanton _x_James Wahner x Ruth Bailey, Chairman Ron Pattinson _a__Roger Stanton -2- ALTERNATE DIREC?ORS Orma Crank Robert Luxembourger Ursula Kennedy Harriett Wieder ____ Todd Murphy __ E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. x Arthur Newton -X--Chris Norby Carrey Nelson Robert Luxembourger Bill Mahoney ____ William Odlwn __ Marvin P. Adler ____ Norman Culver Gene Beyer . Harriett Wieder E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr. -X--Richard Partin · --Joyce Risner x Chris Norby Bob Perry Norma Seidel Jesse Davis --Robert Luxembourger Bill Mahoney __ Marvin P. Adler x Sam Cooper Bruce Finlayson Harriett Wieder -David Lander · ----Robert P. Mandie, Jr. Jean Siriani Philip Maurer Jacqueline Heather Harriett Wieder Steven Smith ----Philip Maurer Harriett Wieder Gene Beyer --Philip Maurer ----Ursula Kennedy Robert Luxembourger Harriett Wieder __ Harry Green Don MacAllister -x-Robert Mandie Harriett Wieder 7/11/84 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, William H. Butler, Blake Anderson, Penny Kyle, Richard von Langen, Ted Hoffman, Paul Mitchell, Chuck Winsor, Tony Gutierrez Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Milo Keith, Bill Knopf, Conrad Hohener, Alden Pearce, Mrs. Richard B. Edgar, Christie Popejoy, Bill Vardoulis, Mr. & Mrs. Eric Eklund, Richard Friedrich, Suzanne Atkins * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICTS 3, 7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt and letters re Board Appointments That the minute excerpt from the City of Irvine, re election of David G. Sills as mayor, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed1 and that Mayor Sills be seated as a member of the District 7 Board~ and, FURTHER MOVED: That the letter from the City of Huntington Beach, appointing Robert Mandie as an Alternate Director for Ron Pattinson in District 11 for the July 11th Board Meeting, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed~ and, FURTHER MOVED: That the letter from the Midway City Sanitary District appoi~ting Richard Olson. as the Active Director and Bruce Finlayson as the Alternate Director in District No. 3; be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Election of Chairman Chairman Edgar advised the District 3 Directors that due to a change in Board representation, Chairman Bruce Finlayson would no longer be an active Director and that election of a new Chairman for the District would, therefore, be in order. Director Don Roth was then duly nominated and elected Chairman of District No. 3. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments , Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -3- 7/11/84 DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1984, the Chairman ordered ~ that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1984, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by Annual election of Joint Chairman the Boards for election of the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary stated that Director Richard B. Edgar had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 13, 1984, in accordance with established procedures. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Richard B. Edgar as Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. ALL DISTRICTS Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman for nominations for the post, This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards for election of the Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Joint Chairman called whereupon Director Don R. Griffin was nominated. There.being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Don R. Griffin as Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. ALL DISTRICTS Presentation of resolution of commendation to retired Director Bill Vardoulis to public service. Joint Chairman Richard Edgar presented a resolution of commendation to retiring Director Bill Vardoulis expressing appreciation to Mr. Vardoulis for his outstanding contributions and dedication • ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that the Report of the Joint Chairman Board was proud to announce that J. Wayne Sylvester had been appointed General Manager in the closed session at the June Board Meeting replacing retired General Manager Fred A. Harper. Mr. Edgar then reported on the status of the Districts' 30l(h) Waiver/NPDES Permit that is presently under consideration by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB). Be reiterated that the major concern to the Regional Board members was the extent and expense of the monitoring program required by EPA. He noted that at the June 8th hearing he had assured the EPA and the Regional Board of our intent to commit the resources necessary to conduct an adequate monitoring program but that we had -4- 7/11/84 requested that after two years experience, EPA and the Regional Board review the program requirements to make sure meaningful information is being obtained. It is our understanding that Regional Board and EPA staff have agreed to scale down the ocean monitoring program somewhat based on the hearing testimony. Chairman Edgar indicated that the Regional Board is scheduled to approve the Districts' NPDES Permit at their next meeting on July 13. Following the Regional Board's action, EPA Region IX will then forward the permit to its Washington headquarters for approval and for joint signature and issuance by August 28, after which there is a 33-day public notice period, making the effective date of the permit on or about October 1. The Joint Chairman then announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee would meet on Tuesday, July 24, at 4:30 p.m. Mr. Edgar then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, July 25, at 5:30 p.m. and invited Directors James Neal and Dick Olson to attend and participate in the discussions. He also advised that a meeting of the Select Committee to Advise the Staff was tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, July 25, at 4:00 p.m. immediately preceeding the Executive Conupittee Meeting. The Joint Chairman reminded Directors that the retirement dinner for the former General Manager, Fred A. Harper, would be held on Sunday, July 22, at the Doubletree Hotel in the City of Orange. ALL DISTRICTS Appointment to Select Committee to Advise the Staff filled by the City of Irvine ALL DISTRICTS Re-aPPointment of Jim Sharp as Districts' Commissioner to SCCWRP Joint Chairman Edgar announced that the vacancy on the Select Conunittee to Advise the Staff, created by retirement of Director Bill Vardoulis, would be representative, currently Mayor David Sills. The Joint Chairman reported that last year the Boards had appointed former Director Jim Sharp to continue as the Districts' Commissioner to the Southern California Coastal Research Project (SCCWRP) following his retirement as a Director. Chairman Edgar noted that Mr. Sharp has been President of SCCWRP for the past year and recommended that the Boards authorize his re-appointment as the Districts' SCCWRP representative for another year because of his knowledge, experience and position on the Commission. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That retired Director Jim Sharp be, and is hereby, appointed to continue as the Districts' Commissioner to the Southern California Coastal water Research Project (SCCWRP) through July, 19851 and, FURTHER MOVED: That Vice Joint Chairman Don Griff in be appointed to continue as alternate Commissioner to SCCWRP. ALL DISTRICTS Report on Proposed District No. 13 Formation Joint Chairman Edgar reported that the Boards of Districts 2 and 7 would be considering several agenda actions concerning the proposed formation of sanitation District No. 13, which would eventually have to be approved by the Joint Boards. He stated that for the benefit of newer directors he would sununarize the reasons for the formation. -s- \ 'i: 7/11/84 District 13 was proposed as a result of a negotiated agreement between the Districts and the County Board of Supervisors to settle the issue of property tax exchanges for newly annexing properties that started over four years ago. District No. 13 will be comprised of approximately 24,000 acres presently outside the Sanitation District boundaries to the north and east of Districts Nos. 2 and 7. Historically, as territory annexed to an existing Sanitation District, they were charged an annexation acreage fee and a connection fee to pay for the sewerage facilities to serve the property. The properties were then placed on the tax roll of the Sanitation Districts and the yearly ad valorem tax was used to pay for annual operating and maintenance costs. However, after adoption of Proposition 13, the State Legislature enacted several measures to provide for implementation of that initiative which require that the affected taxing agencies must negotiate an exchange of property taxes when property annexes to an additional agency. It was the Districts' desire to obtain the same historical share of the property tax that they had received prior to Proposition 13. However, the County being the major tax recipient in the 'area which is essentially undeveloped territory, was reluctant to give up any of the property tax revenue to the Sanitation Districts. Their long-range financial projections indicate a funding shortfall for services to be provided and for which they would have limited ability to raise noney from other sourcesi whereas, the Districts have the ability to levy a user fee for sewerage service. After negotiating the is$ues for more than two years, the Districts' Boards and the County Board of Supervisors agreed to a settlement wherein we would form a new Sanitation District, No. 13, to serve the territory that would have otherwise \..,I been annexed to Districts Nos. 2 and 7. Mr. Edgar reviewed the initial funding of District 13 which will finance its capital facilities' requirement by connection fee revenue, some of which is already on deposit, and its annual operating and maintenance cost from user fees. The new District will not receive a property tax exchange. It is essentially being formed for financial purposes. It will not build any facilities itself but, rather, will purchase capacity in the trunk sewers of Districts Nos. 2 and 7 and in the joint treatment works, in ac~ordance with existing policies. Following a review of the means of financing the properties that will remain in Districts 2 and 7 that had been previously tax-zeroed, Chairman Edgar stated that since the agreement between the Districts and the County was approved, the District No. 13 Steering Committee has been meeting to review the formation proceedings. The Conunittee is comprised of the Directors representing the cities that will be included in the new District's boundaries (Anaheim, Brea, Orange and Yorba Linda), the County Supervisor, and the Joint Chairman and the Vice Joint Chairman representing the Joint Boards. The Conunittee has submitted a separate interim report which was mailed with the agenda material for Directors of Districts 2 and 7 which included the required Engineer's Report and EIR and details of the final recommended financing arrangements for District No. 13. The Districts' proposal for formation of District 13 has been filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission and is scheduled for hearing on November 7, 1984. It will then come back to the Joint Boards for approval prior to forwarding to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration. It is hopeful that the proceedings will be completed around the first of the year. -6- 7/11/84 ALL DISTRICTS Wayne Sylvester expressed his Report of the General Manager appreciation to the Boards of Directors for appointing him the new General Manager to replace Fred Harper who recently retired. \.-) Mr. Sylvester then reported on the status of the Districts' Deep Ocean Sludge Disposal Research Project. Staff and the Districts' Special Washington DC Counsel are attempting to include a provision in the 1984 Clean water Act Amendments which are presently moving through Congress. If adopted, they would grant the EPA Administrator, with advice of the Administrator of NOAA, authority to approve this research project. The General Manager briefly reported on Supplemental Agenda items relative to award of Fabrication and Installation of Adaptor Spools for Meter Replacements, Job No. PW-1321 and award of Specification No. M-016, Installation of Pressure Relief Bypass Around 10 Positive Displacement Primary Pumps. He also commented on a District 5 Supplemental Agenda item to refer to the General Counsel, an appeal received from an industrial waste permittee in connection with a small claims settlement awarded to the District for sewer use fees. Mr. Sylvester called the Directors' attention to the agenda item relative to replacement of old centrifuge equipment at Plants 1 and 2 with more efficient belt filter presses. Be noted that there was a correction in the negotiated price of the spare belts listed in the agenda from $4i,184 to $43,884. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and is hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - Joint Working Capital Fund Self-Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS • 6 & 7 JOINT ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal and State Grants for the 1984-85 Joint Works Improve- ments and Additions 6Ll3l84 6l27l84 $ 178,530.47 $ 335,417.28 34,790.86 375,346.13 53,917.54 62,720.18 3,905.49 2,250.06 127.50 658.73 5,117.57 654.37 29,567.78 10,692.30 321.57 3,041.03 40.38 655.05 68,925.50 2,706.42 6,913.78 696.74 23.29 6,468.40 22.87 $ 382,181.73 ~80li329.56 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the following resolutions authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal Grants under 33 u.s.c., 1251 et seq. and State Grants under Clean Water -7- 7/11/84 Bond Law of 1970 and/or 1974, for the 1984-85 Joint Works Improvements and Additions, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors. ALL DISTRICTS District No. 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 ApProving Change Order No. 1 to the Resolution No. 84-104-1 84-105-2 84-106-3 84-107-5 84-108-6 84-109-7 84-110-11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ;; plans and specifications re That Change Order No. l to the plans and Job No. PW-102 specifications for Filtrate Line to Distribution Box, Job No. PW-102, authorizing an addition of $3,718.00 to the contra~t with Peter C. David Company for miscellaneous items of extra work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-102 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-111, accepting Filtrate Line to Distribution Box, Job No. PW-102, as complete, authorizing . execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Job No. PW-106 ·Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. PW-106, Replace "C" Headworks Conveyor at Treatment Plant No. 2, authorizing an addition of $1,407.00 to the contract with George and a. Morgan Company, Inc. for miscellaneous items of extra work, and granting a time extension of 41 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. · ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. PW-106 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-112, accepting Job No. PW-106, Replace "C" Headworks Conveyor at Treatment Plant No. 2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate agreement with John Carollo Engineers to conduct a Digester Gas Utilization Study ...._,; for consideration by the Boards. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an agreement with John Carollo Engineers to conduct a Digester Gas Utilization Study -a- 7/11/84 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Job No. PW-083 (Rebid) That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-113, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation \.-I and awarding contract for Auto Shop Hoist at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PW-083 (Rebid), to G. E. Jepson Div./Chas. E. Thomas Company in the amount of $15,913.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase order contract for Landscape Maintenance re Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and Specification No. M-015 recol1Ullendation for award of a purchase order contract for Landscape Maintenance, Specification No. M-015, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Tak Takamine Landscape & Maintenance, for a total annual amount not to exceed $24,400.00 for Plants 1 and 2 and the Seal Beach Pump Station. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase of 12 Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-120 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation re purchase of 12 ~our-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-120, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; a.nd, · FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company in the amount of $39,331.00 plus tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding purchase of Three (3) Four-Wheel Electric Personnel That the bid tabulation and Carriers recommendation re purchase of Three (3) Four-Wheel Electric Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-121, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company in the total amount of $9,384.75 plus tax. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase order contract re purchase of 16 Replacement Dresser couplings for Metering Facilities, Specification No. E-153 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to receive bids and award a purchase order contract to the low bidder for purchase of 16 Replacement Dresser Couplings for Metering Facilities, Specification No. E-153, for an amount not to exceed $12,000.00 plus tax and freight. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Repert re standard Sewage Samplers That the Staff Report dated June 25, 1984, relative to Standard Sewage Samplers for influent and effluent sampling to meet internal operating needs and to comply with EPA's NPDFS Permit requirements, be, and is hereby, received and ~· ordered filed. -9- 7/11/84 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing Fabrication, Installa- tion and Covering of 16 Standard Sewage Samplers, Job No. PW-113 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize the staff to proceed on a force account basis with Fabrication, Installation and Covering of 16 Standard Sewage Samplers, Job No. PW-113, for a total maximum amount not to exceed $196,400.00. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order for Automatic Sampler Pumps, Specification No. E-154 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize the staff to negotiate and issue a purchase order to Randolph Austin Company in an amount not to exceed $28,240.00 plus tax and freight for purchase of 16 Proprietary Model 880 Peristaltic Pumps, Specification No. E-154, for use in Standard Sewage Samplers, Job No. PW-113. ALL DISTRICTS Amending Resolution No. 75-146 appointing representatives for the Districts to act as agents in small claims court Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-114, amending Resolution No. 75-146, appointing . representatives for the Districts to act as agents on their behalf in the small claims court of the West Orange County Judicial District. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving assignment of consulting agreements with K.P. Lindstrom & Associates to K.P. Lindstrom, Incorporated . Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Assignment. of Contract re consulting agreements with K.P. Lindstrom & Associates, providing for assignment of said agreements to. K.P. Lindstrom, Incorporated, in form approved by the General Counsel, be, and is hereby, approved and that execution of said Assignment by the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 is hereby authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on June 27, 1984, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Staff Report on 1984-85 Budgets The Director of Finance highlighted the comments in the transmittal for the individual Districts' 1984-85 Budgets included in the Executive Conunittee report. DISTRICT 1 Approving 1984-85 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1984-85 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: -10- 7/11/84 District 1 Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Bond & Interest Fund -1951 $ 5,179,000.00 8,828,000.00 154,000.00 $14,161,000.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 2 Approving 1984-85 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1984-85 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: District 2 Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund Bond & Interest Fund -1951 Bond & Interest Fund -1958 $15,401,000.00 48,255,000.00 20,166,000.00 215,693.00 1,499,521.00 $85,537,214.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Approving 1984-85 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1984-85 fiscai year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: District 3 Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund Bond & Interest Fund -1951 & 1958 $13,686,000.00 43,932,000.00 10,476,000.00 964,276.00 $69,058,276.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 5 Approving 1984-85 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1984-85 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: District 5 Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund Bond & Interest Fund -1951 $ 3,116,000.00 8,694,000.00 297,000.00 45,885.00 $12,152,885.00 -11- 7/11/84 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 6 Approving 1984-85 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1984-85 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: District 6 Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund Bond & Interest Fund -1951 $ 2,663,000.00 3,590,000.00 402,000.00 69,648.00 $ 6,724,648.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 Approving 1984-85 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1984-85 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: District 7 Operating Fund Accumulated Capital 'Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund Bond & Interest Fund -1951. Bond & Interest Fund -1962 Bond & Interest Fund -1970 $ 3,708,000.00 15,351,000.00 7,095,000.00 67,124.00 1,303,452.00 2,011,866.00 $29,536,442.00 FURTHER MlVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 11 Approving 1984-85 fiscal year budgets Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll call vote: That the District's 1984-85 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the following amounts: District 11 Operating Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Facilities Revolving Fund Bond & Interest Fund -1951 Bond & Interest Fund -1958 $ 4,205,000.00 7,411,000.00 1,536,000.00 26,550.00 99,413.00 $13,277,963.00 FURTHER MOVED: That said Budgets be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -12- 7/11/84 ALL DISTRICTS Review of Districts' policy re identifying and permitting industrial and commercial users being charged unfairly. The Joint Chairman recognized Mr. Richard Friedrich, owner of Brea Coin Laundry, who addressed the Board in connection with the Industrial waste permit fees which he contended he is Chairman Edgar advised that since April when Mr. Friedrich previously addressed the Board, the staff and Executive Committee have been re-examining the Districts' policy relative to identifying and permitting industrial and commercial users. He then introduced the Districts' Director of Operations, Blake Anderson, who briefly reviewed the history of the Districts' Industrial Waste permit program. In 1950 the Districts adopted their first ordinance for industrial and conunercial users. A few revisions were made in the 1960's. In 1970 the Industrial Waste Division was established and the policy of permitting industrial dischargers was instituted. The Districts adopted a new connection and use ordinance in 1976 which set forth regulations and defined user types for the first time. In 1979 the Boards adopted a Revenue Program for recovering charges for the cost of treatment for both residential and commercial users. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act requires that all user classes pay their proportional share of the treatment costs. In 1983 the connection and use ordinance was revised once again to comply with governmental regulations. Mr. Anderson stated that the Industrial Waste Division had approached the matter of identifying dischargers and billing for their use in a methodical, systematic manner over the years. He then reviewed the staff report included with the Board members' Executive Committee Report and outlined the current practices, possible alternatives and recommended course of action which is to continue utilizing a pre-determined water consumption level as the criteria for identifying. potential permittees. He also noted that in the 1984-85 budget the ~oards had approved a substantial staffing increase that will expedite the process. He further reviewed the lengthy procedure required to determine if an industry is subject to user fees and the.appropriate fee to be charged. With the increased staffing, the staff feels confident that all appropriate industries will be identified and permitted within the next few years. Following a general discussion of the alternatives by the Directors, the Joint Chairman observed that the staff would be reporting back to the Executive Committee next year on the status and would also keep other interested parties apprised of the progress. ALL DISTRICTS Convene in closed session re personnel matters ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session ALL DISTRICTS The Boards of Directors convened in closed session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 at 8:44 p.m. The Boards of Directors reconvened in regular session at 9:07 p.m. It was moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Management Performance Review Program That the Management Performance Review Program be, and is hereby, approved, as recommended by the Executive Committee. -13- 7/11/84 ALL DISTRICTS It was moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Revised Deferred Compensation Program for That the Boards of Directors hereby '-61 Management Employees adopt Resolution No. 84-132, approving and adopting the revised Def erred Compensation Program for Management Employees, as reconunended by the Executive Committee. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, fixing salary for position of General Manager It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-133, amending Positions and Salaries Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, fixing the salary for the position classification of General Manager. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing the annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal That the following resolutions, year 1984-85 establishing the annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal year 1984-85 in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title ·1 of the California Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: DIST. NO. RESO. NO. LIMITATION 1 84-115-1 $1,658,694 2 84-116-2 6,897,324 3 84-117-3 8,686,347 5 84-118-5 1,786,119 6 84-119-6 1,039,706 7 84-120-7 2,075,088 11 84-121-11 1,825,690 Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file and approve Interim Report of the Building Committee re additional office space requirements filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing Phase I office modif i- Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Interim Report of the Building Committee dated June 28, 1984, relative to additional office space requirements, be, and is hereby, received, ordered Moved, seconded and duly carried: cations by force account work That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize Phase I office modifications by force account work and acquisition of equipment in accordance with the -14- 7/11/84 Districts• purchasing procedures, to provide temporary office space in the administration building and Industrial waste inspectors' office, for a maximum amount not to exceed $52,000.00, plus applicable sales tax and freight. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing purchase order contracts for the purchase of That the staff be, and is hereby, Nine (9) Ashbrook-Simon-Hartley authorized to issue purchase order (Winklepress) Belt Filter Presses and Appurtenances, Specification No. E-152 contracts in the negotiated total amount of $1,920,384.00 plus sales tax for the purchase of Nine (9) Ashbrook-Simon-Hartley (Winklepress) Belt Filter Presses and Appur'tenances, Specification No. E-152, to replace existing worn-out and inefficient sludge dewatering equipment at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 as follows: ITEM AMOUNT TO 9 Belt filter presses $1,710,000 plus tax Ashbrook-Simon-Bartley c/o Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 9 Control centers 166,500 plus tax Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 9 Spare sets of belts 43,884 ·plus tax Gierlich-Mitchell, Inca ~li920i384 plus tax \ ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Job No. PW-132 to Floyd- Kordick, a Joint Venture That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 84-131, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Fabrication and Installation of Adaptor Spools for Meter Replacements, Job No. PW-132, to Floyd-Kordick, a Joint Venture, in th~ amount of $119,631.00, and rescinding Resolution No. 84-84 authorizing the General Manager to award said contract. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Installation of Pressure Relief Bxpass Around 10 Positive Displacement Primary Pumps, Specification No. M-016, to Advanco Constructors, Inc. hereby, received and ordered filed; Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation re Installation of Pressure Relief Bypass Around 10 Positive Displacement Primary Pumps, Specification No. M-016, be, and is and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Advanco Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $15,810.00 for said work to comply with OSHA safety requirements. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of county Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., July 11, 1984. -15- i' 7/11/84 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of \..,,_) Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., July 11, 1984. DISTRICT 5 Receive, file and approve Staff Rep0rt re proposed sewer service charges for fiscal year 1984-85 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated July 3, 1984, relative to the proposed sewer service charges for fiscal year 1984-85, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving schedule of sewer service charges for 1984-85 That the schedule of sewer service charges for 1984-85 be, and is hereby, approved at the same rates in effect for 1983-84, as follows: CONNECTED WATER METER SIZE l" or less l~" 2" 3n 4" 6d 8" 1984-85 ANNUAL CHARGE $ 26.40 52.50 105.00 210.00 420.00 840.00 1,680.00 If a parcel contains more than one water meter, then the charge applicable to each meter shall be added together and the sum levied against the parcel. MULTI-UNIT PARCELS PER UNIT DISTRICT 5 Directing the County Auditor- Controller to include sewer service charges established by Ordinance No. 513 on the 1984-85 property tax bills 15.85 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-125-5, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges 1984-85 hereto established by Ordinance No. 513 on the property tax bills. A certified copy of this resolution is attached and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Receive and file Notice of Appeal of small claims award re Robert c. Durkee, Case No. 178390 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Notice of Appeal of small claims award to the District for user fee assessments filed on behalf of Robert C. Durkee, Case No. 178390, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed 1 and, FURTHER MOVED: That said Notice of Appeal be referred to the Districts' General Counsel for appropriate action. -16- 7/11/84 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., July 11, 1984. DISTRICT 6 Receive, file and approve Staff Report re proposed sewer service charges for fiscal year 1984-85 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated July 3, 1984, relative to the proposed sewer service charges for fiscal year 1984-85, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving schedule of sewer service charges for 1984-85 That the sewer service charges for 1984-85 be, and are hereby, approved at the same rates in effect for 1983-84, as follows: Class of User Basis of Charge 1984-85 Annual Rate Minimum Annual Charge per Unit Single-Family Dwellings Multi-Family Dwellings/Mobile Homes Commercial/ Industrial/Other (government buildings, utilities, non-prof it organizations, etc.) Charge per dwelling unit Charge per dwelling unit Charge per 1000 square feet of building $ 26.40 $ 26.40 15.85 15.85 18.90 18.90 CondominiuJ'llS: ·condominiums are considered single-family dwellings. However, in recognition of the limited potential use of small, convered dwelling units, the owner of a single unit may apply for a reduction of the annual rate from $26.40 to $15.85, provided the unit has less than 11 plumbing fixture units (determined as follows): Single bath with tub, water closet and wash basin Kitchen with sink and/or dishwasher Laundry facilities Fixture Units Assigned by Uniform Building Code 7 fixture units 2 fixture units 2 fixture units 11 fixture units Conunercial/Industrial: To recognize buildings in this classification where the use of the sewer system may not be directly related to the size of the building such as in a warehousing type of use, any owner of a single building may apply for a reduction of the calculated fee to a minimum annual fee of $15.85, provided ~ said building contains less than 11 plumbing fixture units (as determined above). -17- i' 7/11/84 DISTRICT 6 Directing the County Auditor- Controller to include sewer service charges established by Ordinance No. 607 on the 1984-BS property tax bills Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-126-6, directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges 1984-SS hereto established by Ordinance No. 607 on the property tax bills. A certified copy of this resolution is attached and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., July 11, 1984. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:08 p.m., July 11, 1984. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. SO - Casada Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-122-2, ordering annexation of .SS acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Mohler Drive and Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim,. proposed Annexation No. 50 -Casada Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications re Contract No. 2-24 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby approves Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specification for Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, providing for the addition of a minimum cover of three feet over conduits and stating that all metal parts shall be hot-dipped galvanized. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Contract No. 2-24 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-123-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Modifications to Carbon Canyon Dam Pump Station, Contract No. 2-24, to Subgrade Construction Corporation in the amount of $138,630.80. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -18- ~·-------------- 7/11/84 DISTRICT 2 Approving agreement with Berryman & Stephenson, Inc. re design of the Taft Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-6-2, and City of Orange AHFP street improvements AHFP street improvements, be, and is and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee certification re final negotiated fee with Berryman & Stephenson, Inc. for design of the Taft Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-6-2, and City of Orange hereby, received, ordered filed and approved, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-124-2, approving agreement with Berryman & Stephenson, Inc. for design of the Taft Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-6-2, and City of Orange AHFP street improvements, on an hourly-rate basis plus overhead, direct expenses and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $26,950.00. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Receive, file and approve Interim District 13 Steering Committee Report filed and approved. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Receive and file Staff Sununary of Engineer's Report and Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report on proposed District No. 13 ordered filed. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Receive, file and approve Engineer's County Sanitation District No. 13 Formation Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Interim District 13 Steering Committee Report dated June 28, 1984, be, and is hereby, received, ordered Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Sununary of Engineer's Report and Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report on proposed District No. 13 be, and is hereby, received and Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Engineer's County Sanitation District No. 13 Formation Report, prepared by Lowry & Associates, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Approving Formation Schedule re proposed District No. 13 hereby, approved: Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the following Formation Schedule re proposed District No. 13 be, and is Boards receive & file Draft EIR EIR Hearing 7/11/84 8/08/84 8/27/84 9/20/84 EIR Comment Period ends Final EIR mailed to Boards Adopt EIR 10/10/84 11/07/84 LAFC Hearing DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Receive and file Draft Focused Environmental Impa.ct Report re formation of District No. 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of District No. 13, prepared by Ultrasystems, Inc., be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -19- 7/11/84 DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Authorizing the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of the Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of proposed District No. 13 accordance with CEQA requirements. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Establishing August 27, 1984 as the final date for comments on the Draft Focused Environmental Impact re formation of proposed District No. 13 DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Fixing August 8, 1984 as the date for public hearing on the Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of proposed District No. 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to file a Notice of Completion of the Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of proposed District No. 13, in Moved, seconded and duly carried: That August 27, 1984, be, and is hereby, established as the final date for which all comments must be received on the Draft Focused Environmental Impact re formation of proposed District No. 13. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That August 8, 1984, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Office, be, and is hereby, fixed as the date, time and place for public hearing on the Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report re formation of proposed District No. 13. DISTRICTS 2 & 7 Authorizing District No. 2, on behalf of itself and District No. 7, to adopt a single ordinance fixing fees for proposed District No. 13 and provide record keeping for all DISTRICT 2 First reading of proposed Moved,.seconded·and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize District No. 2, on behalf of itself and District No. 7, to adopt a single ordinance fixing fees for proposed District No. 13 and to collect fees received on account for District No. 13. Moved, seconded and unanimously carried: Ordinance No. 206 That Ordinance No. 206, An Ordinance of County Sanitation District No. 2 Establishing Separate Service Area Zones and Establishing a Schedule of Connection Charges and Sewer Use Charges for the Use of District Sewerage Facilities by Properties Located Outside the Present District Boundaries, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said entire ordinance be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 206 by title only, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 206, An Ordinance of County Sanitation District No. 2 Establishing Separate Service Area Zones and Establishing a Schedule of Connection Charges and Sewer Use Charges for the Use of District Sewerage Facilities by Properties Located Outside the Present District Boundaries, be introduced and passed to the second reading on August 8, 1984, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's administrative office. -20- 7/11/84 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then \..;) declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m., July 11, 1984. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 94 - Moody Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-127-7, ordering annexation of 2.06 acres of territory to the District located on Greenwald Lane in the vicinity of Newport Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 94 -Moody Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 105 - Cormier Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-128-7, ordering annexation of 1.23 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Lemon Heights Drive and Lacuesta Drive in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 105 -Cormier Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 106 - O'Toole Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-129-7, ordering annexation of .89 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Overhill Drive and Sirrine Drive in unincorporated County territory, proposed Annexation No. 106 -O'Toole Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Authorizing the General Manager and General Counsel to engage an appraiser for services re obtaining an easement from the County of orange for the South Irvine Lift Station, Contract No. 7-7 for a maximum amount not to exceed DISTRICT 7 Approving plans and specifications Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Gener.al Manager and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to engage an appraiser for services in connection with obtaining an easement from the County of Orange for the South Irvine Lift Station, Contract No. 7-7, $7,500.00. Moved, seconded and duly carried: re Contract No. 7-8 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 84-130-7, approving plans and specifications for the Von Karman Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-8, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -21- .. 7/11/84 DISTRICT 7 Approving Amendment to Agreement with Electrolurgy, Inc. re Industrial Waste Permit No. 7-162 The General Manager reported that the District entered into a Stipulated Agreement with Electrolurgy, Inc. on January 9, 1984, setting forth certain conditions and time limitations to bring the firm into compliance with the District's Industrial Waste ordinance and permit requirements by May 31, 1984. Electrolurgy was unable to meet that time frame but has brought their wastewater discharge into compliance with interim permit limits. The firm requested an extension of the deadline for completion of the installation of pretreatment facilities and staff has set forth certain conditions for such an extension which have now been complied with. Mr. Sylvester stated that the Districts' staff, therefore, recommends approval of their request for an extension of time for compliance with the stipulated agreement to August 7th. The Chair then recognized Mr. Eric Eklund, President of Electrolurgy, Inc., who addressed the Board. He expressed his appreciation for the time extension but indicated that he did not believe he should be required to deposit funds to assure compliance with the agreement as requested by staff. The Districts' General Counsel explained that this deposit is not a fee but simply a guarantee because there has been a series of reoccurring failures over the last few years to comply with deadlines set forth in previous agreements. Mr. Woodruff reviewed the terms of the Stipulated Agreement which requires that Electrolurgy pay the cost of enforcing said agreement~ It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Amendment to the Stipulated Agreement with Electrolurgy, Inc. dated January.9, 1984, relative to Industrial Waste Permit No. 7-162, extending the date for compliance to August 7, 1984, be, and is hereby, approved and authorized in form approved by the Districts' General Counsel. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment . That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Dist~ict No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:27 p.m., July 11, 1984. Secretary, Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 -22- ' 1.''! 1;·i JI I I I ( 1· ,. :::: ):> I ~ :::: . .... fllNO NC we RR MIT NO. (' 6'?116 't £!694&5 C6qlff.f> ~b94!:7 f'.'£5'16e 'lE: '?4f.9 ftf.~4 7i1 !lf '!4 71 'Jf.~~lf 7~ ~'6Yt173 (• f. 9 4 7lf 'H.~'·1~· llf,Q476 "f.94 77 fJ6~lf7(', (f'l47q :'~9'f P0 ~(,~4t-l C~Y4e2 !tF.-34€3 rf,C!4{11t r694e'i r.6C?'tH i,f~4B7 '.if,~4SP 'i694£!9 Cf.9490 Of.9451 1"69"°.2 "i;:.q4e;~ IJ(· "' b ';'I r.fci11~c:. q~c:i4C?f, ')(,'IA~1 r.f,ClfCt_i i:t-011'_?9 1·(-C:~ ('{• (,f:.9501 )6q">fl2 ~-.~~~·J3 '6r::5!'llf ''l 5!: f"' :J ~ ';~~fit: "fit?!H'7 (~6C•~'JP 11 (: ~ fl l_oC. ( 91q9 -JT nJST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/U7/84 P~Gf ~(FORT HUHO[R Arlf 3 COUNTY tANlT~TlON OlSTPlCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY VENDOR A-~~O [LECTRONICS SJLfS ll~C METALS SUPPLYt INC• ~GM ELECTPONJCS, INC. ~CTJON JNST~UMFNTSt INC. ~.JR CAl.lFCRl'\llA A 1 R P ~ r nu CT s & c 1~ on o Ls , 1 N r • AMERICAN SCJ[NTIFIC FPODUCTS AN~HEJ~ SAM SHOP INC. THF ANCHOR FAC~ING CO. V.B. A.11\C:ERSOtJ AGUA BEfli CCFF. AP.P.O~-FTSCC, INC. ARqO~HfAO fLECTRIC CORP. ASf.OCIAT(D LAOOP.ATCRIES rANPOLFH AUSTIN CO. AUTOHATEO cteURFlNE surrLY tACHORA~~ l~ST. CO. 04K[~ PLY~OOC CO., INC. ~ASSf:TT llUSJNESS INTERJOf'S BEACON EAY ENJ(RFRISES, INC. DON C. BfATTIE. ef.Vf(l elf 80~ REHTAL CO. RLACK s rrc~rfl ~r~. co. POYLE L~Gl~[ERJNG CORP PRISlOL P~RK HEGJf6L GRfe+ l~C CPT CALJFCR~IAe INC. rs COt1F ~Ny CALT~. ASSOC. or SA~. AG(NrJES CAMCqtLG[ FILTEP CORP. CA~[Y SIG~ GRA~H!CS Cll~ f.l\lf ST 11\lWS Tin r:~, H;C • rH~VPON u.s.A., JNr. CINCI~~-TI TIMf fGUJP., INC. CL4RK CYl ~APC~ARE COAST I~~LRJNC~ AGE~CY CCLl PAqMfR JN~TRUHFNT CO. CONNELL CH~VROLET C:O~R OCI< c o•w llNY ro~SrLJOATEC ELCCTPJC•l DIST. COC.PfR (~~~GY ~rov1rE5 C: fl u.a E 'I r; YC fJ C 0 Pf • CR C IJ ~ f E' t\ C E ~. ~ ll t: I· l. Y C fJ • , T I\ C • CAL CC~SOLJPATfD WAT~R DECl<lR INSTPU~[~T SUPFLY C:O. or co CLAIHS PAID 06/l~/~4 .Ar10UNT f,c; 3. 56 $796. 66 ~179.!lb Slt942e60 !!)'H9CO $4 )3.fl6 Sf a. ci3 uao.oo $877.H \335.15 'f21 •61J6.5(, $47.7') t372·'t!'I $.!'\ '1. ".I '1 H51.n ~35. ')~ Slt'427.47 H97. 7'° !.37~.Sfl s.s30.t10· sc;ae.u.oo s..~F-2. ec SltlAO.tlC $51.P.7 :\c6, 23 J. 75 l:?6.(ll1 • lH'l .. 143 1.19 .. 6[, !'tflll.~ll S27.~F. !4°7.26 S.2tl~i!.:}l'I i5,119.n U eR4.? .!: !,;. 115~.4~ !175.Qf• $,l.'f!J 3,f,'J. !':4 Uql.flt $2t 1H6e'~? s~.~'•!».~fi Sl e55l\ectl sq,7<;1.rl? ·u:4. 10 Slt564.49 11qc.Hr ( IJESCPIPTJON OFFICE SUPPLIES STEEL STOCK ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES AIR FARE SPECIALTY GASES LAB SUPPLIES TOOL REPAIRS. - PUHP PARTS WELD I NG SUPPL I ES CHEMICAL COAGULENTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRIC CART PARTS LAB ANALYSIS TUBING ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES SHALL HARDWARE OFF I CE FURNITURE TRUCK MAINTENANCE CRANE RIGGING CLASSES ELECTRIC CART PARTS TRASH DISPOSAL TOOLS ENGR. 7-8 PRE EHPLOYHENT EXAHS WORD PROCESSING MAINTENANCE FREIGHT CASA CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FREIGHT SAFETY SUPPLIES FERRIC CHLORIDE TANK RENTAL ENGINE OIL CONTRACTOR PW-101 SHALL HARDWARE ANNUAL TRAVEL ACCIDENT INSURANCE PREHIUH SAFETY SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS BUILDING HATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ENGINE REPAIRS RETENTION PW-IOlt RETENTION PW-105 WATER SOFTENER RENTAL GAUGES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ... (, • ;; I N ::: ( F ur:p r;c ~; fd-:ti Af.Jl "'" • "~0 ~ l 11 ,, EiC!!:. J 1 1:r.r_;r.1;i '•£. c::; 1? ,, ,;. c !'-J q r f:. n '• ! r.. ,. f, c ~.\ 1 (, q, r. '~ 1 7 ':f < r, J ~ •. ( c ! l ':! .. ~'j~ ?~ : f-'' r.? 1 (• f c.: ~· ;:' ;> r £: c. !'-f! :z. ·~: (-, ~~.? ,, ' £. <"• !: ;: ~l :·f c:~~f, . ! c '.: ~ 1 , f<.i~ 2 ·~ t~ (,, <:· ~) , .. (~· I f.C ~.I:' '1 r f r.!"1~1 I ~· '7 ~ :' 2 "'L ';,u· ~!· '•: r; •)~ 4 ''f ·.~ !' ~"· .~ f ~' ,. ?-h ;:~-e! :q :.~. ~ ":1:1 '" ~ ~ ~"7,«f .: (· C' •: '· ·~ , .. 6 ::i~ 41 '~ C1 !J ,, :1 ~~c. o~ 4 ... r (· (."' '' '' , t· '::' ~ "~) ; (, t·~ ,, (, "~. ci:.1, 7 !6°~"f~ "!-~· ~ '• q ~· r c =: ~ •1 ; (. r.. ~~ ~· \ "f c. ') !~ :) •'(· '.''-~. ~ ·" f-q ~ ~-. ,. !' ! r; !. ! rl ·-( 9 l "" -J T [! I ~ T ~ c R k IN(; r fl r T T fJ l pp 0 c [ ~ s I NG I) fo Tr (·. / 11 7 I R ,, p /! G i: :- R[PORT NU~9fP AF4~ COUNTY SAtlJTATtON OHTtHCTS OF Or.f.NCF COll~:TY Vf Nl:Off nELf.FTFLO \ClUP. DllSEL CO~T~Ol cnRr OIGl~Yll ccrfUl~~ SERVICES fJRl·~LIOf.t H!C. PU"ll'I Erl\.AR('S CORP. fl W vt P HJ S T Q UM f NT , JtJC: • l.D.~.~,I~r.. ' ~.r. LINDSTROM fIM ro~~A~Y. INC. OSTf'Af\., 11\C. ftJCIU.N TP~ • rnr.. ENGl~EFPS SAL£S-sr~VJCE co. FALCCN CISFCSAL ~[PVICE F[OtQAL f.~~f.f.SS CGPF. flHtt[P !l UOf\TfR co. FROST ENGI~f(PIMG SERVJC[S CO. CITY Of FULllRTON GHC lRUCI< R COACH LA~AHL LU,,~fp (0. EE~f PAL l(LfP~O~E CO. GI F. R LI CI' -fl I TC 1-l £.LL , J NC: • l't\CH CCf.IFAra UUf.P J fJ Sl;l'll'l y re. ~A~~l"GTO~ INOUSTPJtL ~LASTICS ~· I ~ ., H L M:; HJ 7 llOllSf". C'F R/lllFHJfS ~Yf)ft(lll)( IN~USTPJAL lHREAOEO PROPUCTS I ~!G~ /,f-1 I= Ar' ER J~ST~UPE~TATJON lAOCR~TORYtlrr IRV!~~ INC~~TRIAL LANOSCAr~ I ~ V lfl E R A I\ C t1 ~J A T [ R 0 I ~ TR I C T J~N~f~ TOOLS 8 ALLOYS t<A~A~ BEARINGS t ~UFFLY l<flLY FJP£ C.O. ~J~G ~EtRJ~f. l~C. KIHST FUKP & MACHJ~r ~ORKS t<Lr-q•-L IN~ r.ORP l<~lf>r-[k5 CO., JNr.. l ~ ~ U~lfORM SLFPLY CO L.11 .\.:.~:., l'·iC. ~.P. I b~f~If en. L(WCO [l~CTFIC to. l l r. .... 1 t r-1 r. r, I q p "I L TC: f. s ' I "'(" • tYnN~ l\T'l SEr.u~JTYt l~C. Ji flll. AfH t1 r ~. cr•ci.. N fl T J (' t; t. L ~ C ~ I C ~: Clfl~S PAID 16/13/~q ldHIUNT ! 4 f\'l. &IC' ~ 7"!9. '•" $96Hei!!l tt:9~ .. ~~ \Jt~.;>J $'31'hllf 11,;l.0(1 S2,56l.Al $1~.'~.ll'J $'3,51'.'0·"'1 $ 1 ' '>. 4 2 • ~· 0 Hlf t761. 'c; :1.q5.f,5 int.?:> :i3~~.7f.. $15~·62 S 7 t 6Cj I!•~;.' S3t4q3.11R $;?.5)( •• 7'f ~5,&fO.~I\ '31~.q~ ~ 2 ll." 1 Bt51i.~!J iH.f.I~ "",. lf 1 1SB.41 i5~-.1.;>r ~ 12 lf. I);> u.~:>{le.ti: t2,J77.2r~ ... ". "r. '-:H • 7': $l ~I]. ~3 S.3f. J • lf 'J l7t::!·~·~.5r, ll.!':54.72 1'1lR.~~1 i:s,.Hn.c:!:! $3,~1~6.':~ U63.4:~ i1.1:_1;>.~!'· t '• t; ( •• '• 'l n 1tt.22 !· l • ~ .i ~ • ~ \l . . 1 "-:-; • 7CJ !! !_.I.-:!• ~9 r~ r s c p I f' T I 0 ~, HOSE ENGINE REPAIRS MINI COMPUTER MAINTENANCE ENGINE OIL PAINT SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OFF I CE SUPPLIES OCEAN MONITORING ENGINE PARTS SLUDGE HAULING DELIVERY SERVICE PI f'E SUPPLIES VALVES WATER USEAGE TRUCKS LUMBER/ ODOR CONTROL CHEMICALS TELEPHONE REGULATOR PARTS LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES SMALL HARDWARE EMPLOYEE MI LE AGE B.ATTER I ES ENGINE OIL SHALL HARDWARE OFFICE SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE WATER USEAGE TOOLS BEAR I NG SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES BEARING SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES BUILDING HATERIALS UNIFORM RENTAL WELDING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES ELECTRIC CART PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL FREIGHT LAB SUPPLIES ( .. .. .. , l t" , ~ I • ::: ::J:::a I \..N :: fUNL NO \JJ!PkANT f.10. ('~'·~U~ i;t1~ ~ .. r:.7 ,, & C)'.)f.fl :1 ~oi:r,q ~'6C?~f. ~ c: f. c ,_' ~ -~ bC: ~;i:.? r•f,O~t.'i :'f. q5(,t1 ~·'· ro ~•E ~· ,. f :; !'i (,'- ~ t· '='•U I :1( '"''~'1P •tE«~f.c; ~ ! .._, ~· H~ ~ ~ c;!' 71 :"!'"'''"'1'! •• ••. l". ~, 7 3 ,, f 9~. 71, :i~ cf. 7r; "ll<;f 7<> rf.<;~77 r.: f. r" ~. 7 p .-. i:, r; !J 7 r:. '(er !.1 IJ f•t,;. r ;: 1 ~1 f, r. ~-F 2 f 6 ~, !"l':: 0:-f. a~:~· ti "! ~r,l ~ :. f. ('! !: J.f (•t,C!;-IJ1 ;•(-.~ ~·dF f (: c: !".f• '1 .-t-c ~ c: ·~ :_ ( '•!. Q 1 ,.. f: ~. !" ':-~ q.c.~ ~~ ( ( G". '14 (if.~~ CH; (.f.. c "a(, !, f c,~. q7 '!~ c !"1': t' ;!' C!'. ?f:: (•f.C.(; 1.i'l Cl':'? r-1· 1 ( ql~9 -JT nJ~T UCRKING CLFIT~L PROCESSING 04TE §/~7/H4 FAG[ ~(FORT NUMBEP AF43 COUNTY ~ANJTATJON CISTPICTS OF ORANGf COUNTY .. CLAIMS PA10 ~6/l~/84 VCNr.OP ccc1or~T~L CHEMICAL CO~F. CLYMPIC CH(MJCil to. OMICRON WELDIN~ SUFPLY, INC. OP~NCE VALVE & rJTTl~G CO. C OlJHY CF GI< ANGE COU~TY S4~1TATJO~ DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PF'G I fliOU~ TR J£ S, 11\!C • FACJFIC SAF~TY lUUJPHfNT CO. F'ACIFIC eELL ~APTS Uf\LJf'JTEt ~fARSONS LAWUMOWf~ CENT[~ Pf.NIH.LL CCf'PANY rrpqy EGUIFM[Nl co~r. JOM PfSICH PJCK~ICK FAPfR PROOUCTS r·os T~,.,, s T[R t•AU GLD FR ( f'P osr In: ~AJ~cow GJSPOS~L CO. HO VALVf CC·•t ltJC. ltlF RfGJSTER RJC~tRhSO~ P L£~CUfF C~. Th~ODORE RPeJNS FC~P ~ A "IC otJ I N C • S~NO DOLLAR ~USJ~ES~ FORMS ~A~TA AN.6 PIVfP FLOOO YVONf\1 ~ <;Ct-\U1P C ITV OF SE .6L P,rt. Cit ~r. HS, llOff: UCK f. CO. rnH'POCK SUN·LY ~MITH ~JP[ & SUFPlYt INC soun1rP.rv CAtJF. rn1~0N co. SO. (.AL. t;O~ CC. ~ournrnN COUNTJr::; OIL co. SCC11T SHVfN~ TllE rnrii.:L J!'~S ~t.lf.[Tlll~t co. C~4PlE~ f, l~O~~S THOMAS ~prs. HAPS TttOMPSON LAcr.un: co. ltJr.R TP!Pr.ft1PY Sff?VJCES T~A~~Afl[PJC.6 DlLPV~L, JHC. H. O. T1'FfiirE TRUCK ~ tLTO SUPfLYt JMC. TH UF:' SO A J L lJI (IS TlHtf. SAU$ II :-.J I (l ~· (: It c n • n F c /. L IF • l\ft.OUNT Sl·,628.31 uo.121.48 s.166.J1 ~.277.59 !766.62 S3t82Re9~ Sle0q9.63 Sle'l88e86 $11~.52 S 7A8.1lJ $~2'Jef.IC} set.9lf $3,653.~l $575.70 f.;>'111. t;5 s2,oor..1Jo $3 '. '.'10 t33't.Otl ·J.6? .5lf ''fl!SiJtl .. !2Jtfl36.30 !.3 7 .18 $7!)0.0~ \!;~::~.fill f. l ..s I} I).~ '1 f.12.0 2 1l:?f:.7~ 'LEIA 7. J!" iq71.~4 !.12}.'!Q f.22.76.5.lfl S·'h547.70 f~t.'•45.35 q·~t.f..P 12.1u,.~n .\ ~'1 .... ~ ,,~%-~!:: ssn.r:::w iJ •'•66.4-': lq'J n. 't'l tlt356.4!'\ s1~2.r~q $1,ql'-~"' $:'•4'J·1.;i1,. 1H!l.f-P (,112.)H ( 0 E SCP I P T I 0 ~J CAUSTIC SODA CHLORINE WELDING SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMS REPLENISH WORKERS' COHP. FUND PAINT SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES TELEMETER ING TRUCK PARTS LAWNMOWER SUPPLIES TOOLS ENGINE PARTS CWPCA CONFERENCE EXPENSES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES POSTAGE INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE TRASH DISPOSAL FREIGHT LEGAL ADVERTISING RETENTION 3-21-2R TRUCK PARTS CSDOC #7 HANHOLE REPAIRS OFFICE FORHS ANNUAL HEHBERSHIP FEE EMPLOYEE MILEAGE WATER USEAGE TOOLS SHALL HARDWARE, TOOLS PLUMBING SUPPLIES POWER NATURAL GAS DIESEL FUEL EMPLOYEE MILEAGE PUHP PARTS/PAINT SUPPLIES/TOOLS TUB ING ELECTRIC HOTOR OFFICE SUPPLIES PAINT SUPPLIES TEMPORARY HELP ENGINE PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS AIR SAMPLING PIPE SUPPLIES GASOLINE ..., . c: • :::: J> I ...::::-:::: ( ( FUt!ll ~O qlqq -JT CJST WCRKJNG CAPllAL F~OCESSING OATf 6/07/84 PAGf Rf PORT NUMBER Af4~ COUNTY SAHJTATJON OIST~JCTS OF ORANG[ COUNTY UfPf•.,fd fl:l!. .~ ~: r. f (;:: ''l :., f•.3 fl(• ~I ( r 4 j1(C~!.~l'i ~·6 C:· f jl 1: \'(' t. (17 'l6l"•f-'.<' •: ( c ! ·~ 0 1; f '1 ~ 1 I) ,. f c:., l l I fC'fl~ ·:«:.q~l~ (• ! (' (>, 4 H'·G~ 1!"· "fr,. f. J f, '· ~ '.' !=-l 7 ~:,. •: f. J fi VOJOOR UNISTPUT LOS ANGlllS UNITEO rA~Cfl ~fkVJf[ U~ITlC STATES (L[VATO~ CORF. V1JF SClfNlIFIC VAll.f.Y CITH"S SUHLY CO. VALVr SERVICfSt Jrc. VAf.lfCt lf~C. VAffJAN/JNSTPUH[NT ~IVISJON lo: -K -t1 fl J V I S 1 0 N ~AUKfS~A fNGINf SERVICfNTER WfSTfR~ PROC£SS Of5JGNt JNr. YE~TER~ ~JR[ & ALL0YS ~HITE, FJ~f & Vl~Vlllf WH I HJ E Y H AC H I N [ P Y t Ht C • THOMAS L• WOOORUFF. INC. GEOR~f YAqDLEY ASSOCIATES 21P TC~POP~PY fFPSONN[L CLAIMS PAID ~6/13/~~ AMOUNT $q~. 59 :r.22. 91 s.121.2!"1 iu2.q3 $30.~lf ~617.':2 S5?.7.':'7 S2'H.C:'l S.3~lf .23 $l e9,1J.5q :t?.25•lf(' 16'tJ.,f. i1.~c;,.~6 !·lt~Blf.82 'H 1 t663. )II f2~5.10 :f.2A7. :)If lOTAl fLAIMS PAIC ~6/l3/e4 2.382•1Al.73 SUHHARY //I OPER fUND 82 OPER FUND #3 OPER FUND #3 ACO FUND #5 OPER FUND #6 OPER FUND #7 OPER FUND #7 F/R FUND Htl OPER FUND #13 ACO FUND //5&6 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELf FUNDED LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND SELF FUNDED WORKERS 1 COHP. INSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIHS PAID 06/13/84 ~==============~= AHOUNT $ 12 7. 50 ·5,117.57 8,246.38 21 ,321.40 321.57 40.38 2,691.75 66,233.75 6,913.78 300.00 23.29 178,530.47 3i.,790.86 76.50 3,828.99 53,617.54 $382,181.73 DESCRIPTION STEEL STOCK DELIVERY SERVICE PLANT #1 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE LAO SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES SHALL HARDWARE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS REGULATOR PARTS WELDING SUPPLIES DEEP OCEAN S(UOGE DISPOSAL STUDY ENGINE PARTS LEGAL SERVICES PIPE SUPPLIES TEMPORARY HELP ( .. J • ~ I ,_. :: Fllf'!(I MC ~JARRtl\1 NG. tf,'.1~~~ r c c:<-~lf (•(, C(.~~· :lf"f:~.f (:6Yf '!!7 t'f l'IEi.rn r. f <:1 f ~c; l1f-4£ lf 1~ •!bC.f 41 ( (:~if 4 2 (•f. sf· 4~ ;; f r.f. If If 06 C..f "~· !', f,C.f: 4f- 'icC f: 't7 i'f·<·f.4fi r f, .,,, 4 c;. r_.f'-: c,f ! ... r. : (. t:•f ~.1 i•f· c:: b!;: f !: (', f '· ~· 'tr.~ c 54 ( f 'i(: ''!l r f •_, f· ~·t­ q. =-· t::~7 re, r: E:-~11; 11 f. c· f, ! <I tff:Hl1 -. E c f.f I 11 ( -~,.(:, ':? If r_;bf1 '3 '., '-9f.(: ,, I.(.''; l• t !_= ,• f, G f F:f• rt.l.f n {~<)f(-~l, ." f,Of (·'l ;:f. St• H 1 .. f:nl 71 1:(,C(:72 (JfCf7:. ,,,. "t; 7lf . ~ i: c ( 7 ~~ li(;';6 7f> (If, c,( 7 7 fl( ~·6 H ( cqn~ • JT DIST UCIH<ING CArJT/IL Fl\OCESSJNG DATE 61'2'?/Blt f'AH Pf PORT ~UMRE~ Ar4j CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COllfvTY VE NL OR A[IC LUfo'OER CORP. AG~ iLECl~ONICS, INC. Alfi INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY A.s.u. ~~VA~C[O CFFJCE SE~VICES tDVl~CO CONSTRUCTCPSt JNt. ~LL-STATE V[HICLfS, INC. ALLIED SUFFLY CO. k~[PICA~ SCJfNTJrJc PRODUCTS ALtlYTJCAl ~[ASUff[Mf~TS TP.( A~C~CR FACKl~G CO. FLAKl F. ~NOERSON 1.~~ut l'fl'! crf!P. fl C CA T l (' C E tH £R tfiCO GLASS & ~lRRC~ A~RGY-~ISCOt INC. ~RTU'.I, INC. ASSCCJAT[C CONCR(T£ fPOO., INC 'SSCCIATf[ LteOPATORILS AUTOfATfO CfEURl\J~G SUPPLY l·GN C. eF.6'TllE L1£ VC 0 FJERLY ~ ASSOCl"lES, INC. PLUf OlA~C~L MATERIALS llGS~: ~:t. NUF AC TUR I NG CO. BP.Of·!\~ IN~TRUM(r.1 H. TH[ ruRK[ CO,PA~Y f!UT I [I\ me: I N([R I Ne•' me. C t P ~ECChOJTIO~JNG CG. fK ru~~ A~D OE~ATf~ING coRr. CPT CALJfCPNIAt INf. rs rrwr. .t.NY Jc 1rn c " P o L L o rn G 1 r.; r rn s Jthh f.A~CLLC fNEINf[RS CHfVFON U.S.A., INC. CC~Sl FIUE fCUl~~[Nl f.O~IPUTE:ff lo.AVE CONP.OCI< COTAf\:Y CONSOLJDAl[D [l[CTFIC/l rtsT. ro~~OLJOATfO ~EPROOUf.TJO~S C~NTINE~TAL CHEMICAL CC CCO~CR ENfR~Y Sf PVlCfS CLST~ ~ES/I AUTC PARlSt l~C • F. l. fOULTE~ CPANE RfNT~l fOURTON & ASSOCIATFS CAL CO~SCLJ[ATE~ YATE~ CL~IHS PAID ~6/27/84 AMOUNT S2t278.6A 1lt43.93 $339. i q S55.S8 S57.8:S H57,8H.C6 SltH0.76 $33 .13 5315.22 si69.3e $265.UC S'15.t0 125,(,19.El H4.00 $21. 91 $]'13.42 S21.2(1 Sl~.3.03 S9 1!C.:l0 $222.04 $1,545.00 .S7'16.5~ 1550.01) 1347.0~ '-ltiC.45. $~~90.40 $615.75 s'tth 1?7 .2a S4,860eUO S2't.let;>.C4 U'tt.j~ $] tl':l5.5h S.!Sti1B2.G7 !-182.78 14,218.f,~ iq9.3.77 Hll.(,lt s,q7.:ii U t28 7. OE. st.497.!f:- $9,~IJJ.sn t.j<; l • 1..! (1 is u9. ·s6 $5.tlf .•• ,,, !J,~~5.(!;J 1. 2 ~H~ • ~1 ~' ( [l[SrPJF'TJOf\I LUMBER ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PI PE SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PW-097, P2-25-2 VEHICLE LEASES VALVES LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS CWPCA CONFERENCE EXPENSES CHEMICAL COAGULANTS LAB SUPPLIES GLASS ELECTRICAL. SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES BUILDING HATERIALS LAB ANALYSIS WELDING SUPPLIES CRANE RIGGING CLASSES ELECTRIC CART PARTS WORKERS' COMP. ADMINISTRATOR BUILDING MATERIALS SAFETY SUPPLIES HAGNETIC FLOW HETER SHALL HARDWARE ENGR. P2~2~, VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROJ, PUMP REPAIRS CONTRACTOR PW-099 WORD PROCESSING SUPPLIES VALVES ENGR. Pl-20, J-15, P2-25, ENERGY TASK FORCE ENGR. P2-26 GASOLINE, ENGINE OIL FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES BUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES blUEPRINT REPRODUCTION CHLORINE ENG IHE REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS CRANE RENTAL EIR Hl,6,7 HASTER PLAN UPDATE WATER SOFTENER RENTAL, RESIN TANK EXCHANGE ( -iii • :::: tp I N ::: ( F U~JO ~lO ~11 ~ f< 1H! l N 0 • ;1(, 56 7q rf,~f,PC lj (•Cf P,} (f:t'.;ffl2 1t~C'lf.( .3 •! (, c;" l! 4 [: f fJ f· l' ~' n f: cf· Af rt, c.f 117 f.'f ff~(> r!6°H'9 (fl 7' f., i. ~· (-. r l.': 1 l:f c_.; c;;\ ~, f.; f ':~ r-f, c: ,. ~ilt Jf. ') (; 5~~ [If..,(.,': fo r.r ,., fr 7 (. (1 c, f c;J• ff.qt: t;';l !'.' t=. c; 7~ c I t'HllJ ... f:.':-7tJ< ~f.r 7D ff:~'.Hti i'(. c; 7 (I~. '. f. cq r· !: Pf.~ 7 )7 i 6 <;, 7 llf· flf,'-70'1 '.• ( c: ·11 I 1lf, ri 711 r,c:-11;- Llf: lj 71 ~ Ul: ':' 7 J 't ~ f,C 71 ~· ~I(: u 7 J (1 '!f 0 71 7 '"! f. ~ 71 J: <ii= '"·71S r.t-572!1 'di 7:?1 f' f, 72:' (1f 723 l;f.: 7"" ( qlqY -JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL FRQCfSSING_OAT( 6/22/84 PAGE Rf.PORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SA~JTATION DISTRICTS OF Or.AN~E COUNTY V[NOQP tAJA SC\URC[S r[CKER INSlRU~fNT SUPFLY Co. VECCI Cl A ms P_A JO 06(2J/A ~ .. ··-.... AMOUNT .. S60. !) !l $279185 f;[SCHIPTIOH ENGINEERING PUBLICATION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ( ~ OflF'Hl SYSHHS• iN(. P.E~-~AF SALES & SEPVIC( OIES£L R GAS TURBIN£ PROCRfSS DJP.[CT SAffTY CC\. S5,8~~.q~ 3537.0U S7"1.f;l3 $150.!1.J 116:.J.lf7 HINI COHPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES, PROGRAHHING HANHOLE COVERS UUMA~ rJESEL INJ[ClION nu~N fOWAROS co~r. lASlMAtu Jl\C, rLfCl~TC fACHJNfRY MF~. CO. HIV 1 RCSFH[H CO. F~LCON CISPCSAL SERVICE FISChfR ~ PORT£R er. FIS~:[K COl\lRCLS flSHER SCIENllf IC co. FL~l & VENTICAL CCNC~ETr FOOT~JLL EARDEN fCUIPHENT VAL FCll-! g so~s CITY Of FCU~TAI~ VALLEY COHALD L. FOX r ~~~OCJAlfS TH[ FOXn.ORO COMftNY f~ANCE co~~RESFOR rROOUCT GW ~Al~TE~~NCf, INC. CANttL LU~~ER CO. L[M-0'-LllE FLASTirs CORP. GENr~AL T£LEFHr~r ro. GPAYb/.R flf.CTRJC CO. J E t.rJ G P I G G ~iJL TJ, HiC. I-IP.• t•U B CA fl F.S. Hl'GJi(S co., Jfl:r:. f 1 TY 0 f t I U I\ T I ~ f: TC f.; PE AC t-1 ~UN11NGTCI\ SUPPLY HYOHOH 'IC 1 s r o c o rw AN v I~rUSTRJ~l ASPHALT 11\GHIH' l"'AF£P. l~VJ~E S~[f~ING SfFVICf t< .e.PLf[ COf".PANY KA5 SAF£TY PROOUCTS ~[fN-KUT APRASJV[ er. ~ELCO SAL[S & fNGINfERING CO. Kfll.Y F'IPE fO. Kf~NEOY/J[l\KS E~fl~fl~S ~J~~ PE~~JNG, l~C. H, o~ 2. 4!:i !-482.73 s.120~·25 S277.6l S.4t07?.0C $18.462. 74 s2,220.3~ i.~Q6._~t.tl_. t104.8'1 U3l•.oo fHa.J;> 121 tbllR.lf5 $573.50 ic>,15~.oo Sl,342.A3 t.'157.95 u12.ec 1-45.3.5E s.1~3.97 sr,,739,1q t.b44.'IP $2!1.50 '196.;H !42.lft $679.91 u1.n $6.6~ $::;,t;i38.3'1 $38.79 $26. ff, u.t.2:J.21 '249.uO S't33.'15 s2tj4 elf 3 HH .9(t $62. H f.367.39 ua.-nq.~5 i!>,1£1~.,.2 ENGINE REPAIRS SAFETY SUPPL I ES ENGINE PARTS PAINT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLiES ENGINE PARTS EIR 65&6 HASTER PLAN UPDATE SLUDGE DISPOSAL PI PE SUPPLIES REGULATOR PARTS LAB SUPPLiES CORE DRILLING TRUCK PARTS CONTRACTOR PW-109 WATER USEAGE SAFETY CONSULTANT ELECTRiCAL SUPPLIES COMPRESSOR PARTS PUHP PARTS SHALL HARDWARE GLASS TELEPHONE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE MILEAGE SHALL HARDWARE TRUCK PARTS SAFETY SUPPLIES WATER USEAGE SHALL HARDWARE LUBRICANTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES BUILDiNG MATERIALS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PLANT MAINTENANCE PA I NT SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES TOOLS PIPE SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES ENGR. PW-061R-3 BEARING SUPPLIES !' ;_, I ~ ' i ! o I I • w I ... ~ ~ I \.N ::: FUND t\O \lt~RANT NO. '~b~7 :?!:1 l!f97?.C- (lf:q7:!7 r£:.5'?2n fi6'H2CJ 1'6C::73!l i'f:cnt "'(: C. 7 '!i? l)f .. q 7 3.'- l}f>" 7 .H ,.f'i7:!5 ';'.f.C7n 1l~.c7·.~7 (o(.q7~t1 (;(;.C'•7.39 (.6~74~ :j~'.IJl;l )f,~ 1t;2 ... :t: q74) ·16974'• llfq7'f~. ~f.'-:7% ti(.~q 4 7 t;f. r. 746 :Jf,C:·74C:- ilf c: 7':: r 'if> i;. 7~ 1 (. f: C. J!·£ ('f; I.} 7~·,3 ~( cq ~· 4 ~~ f-c,; 7 !' ~. fJt y 7~(, ·~f 0 7 '.J 7 (•f q1 1H• ri;c-n:- ''( q7f (. "fC:H I ..;f.'17£:·2 r.£ ~ 7f .. ~ :·f~H'+ (;f.1)765 '' f, ~· 7 H: re:.r..H:7 l f,O 7f JI •.•£. G 7f-'; r;;.~77~ ( 9JC9 -JT DIST ~CRKJNG CArJTAL r~OCCSSING PATE 6/22/~lt FAGf R~FORl NUHOER AF43 ~ COUNTY SA~ITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG[ ~OUNTY CLAJHS PAID n&/27/A4 vrnooR ~L UJGE R S TlEL L.r:i.w.s •• INC. LA ~nTTE CHEMICAL rPQDUClS LAU~sr~ CCLOR LAP. LIG~TING OISTRJBUTO~S, INC. LOCAL AGE~CY FOR~ATJO~ CO~M LOWRY & A~SQCIATES LYC~s Jt\l'l SCtURITY, INC. M ~ L T~LCK noov ~AC~ TR~CKS, INr. KCfOY T~ACTO~ ~ EGUJPrENl ~C~ESSC~ C~[~JCAL cc. MCr-'At.TEH-CAl<R Sllf.PlY CO. M(CHiNICAL OPIVf SY~T£HS ~ESA CONSCLIOAT(O ~-TEF ~INf SAFETY ~PPll~NCES CO. r~OfJIHK, 1r.:c. MG~T~O~ER' EL[V~TO~ COMFAN' MOOFE f~OCUCT~ CO • Gf.OFf:[ & e. r.OPGAN co •• JNr. r.OTJCN INC~~TRJfSt INC. ~Yt~S TIRE SUPFLY NALAP JNDlHRlfS me. NAHL & CC. ~4TJONAL LU~~EP SUPrLY l[l~ON·CU~~, INC. ClClOEl\TAl ChEP41CAL COF.f. OCEAN SAll CO., INC. ~LY~FIC c~~rtCAl co. COUNTY Of OIH0 NGr ro. ~F CFAtGE-AUOJTCR cn~lMOLP COUNTY ~iNJHTION GISTRJCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY U.CJflC MCflLf OFFICES rHJFTC ~HETY rautr~F:NT co. h'\C IF IC eE LL P~LL UE~l[~~ tU~P. r~HAL & l.UDWIG r:.11EN COH • ff~HA rcRl P~OLUCTE· JNC. ~ARCLt rRl~ROS[ IC[ FUL ~:H Hf.Ell ~ftff[~lY lNTER~ATJONAL TPUCKS Tll[ ~Ef:HHR TH• l)[l:JSTER Ht[ f.£f U!ll C ~Uf'f!l Y CO• CF CALIF., I NC. RF.t.NCF.CJ (L[ClRf.NIC H<Ol'llfH Af"OUNT il e5'+il. :JO ~212.91 $218.'t~ i.sn.97 t2lf3.57 $250.(J(! $555.'iC t666.0C S6n. 08 tlt240.20 S5.~0 $8, 176. ·l~ $:?48.20 ss 7. s J !6.JO i-311 .• 90· S4tf>72.95 1329.'IP. n23. eo S6 • 71 'I• (t I) $746.49 u2a.:S1I S5lf.57 U,875.0ll 1·289. 83 ~·367.4~ t.'l,856.~6 04 7.63 $20,5:58.61.! s11,112.1;:i !7'5t980.00 t.1.1100.0£. $1':'c.52 i9U3.E:.3 t3;!9.7f, !.l.(130.36 no ,626. ·10 Ut2Pl.97 Ut71l?.tH $,1).00 018.00 ~250.'13 SltH5e7lt ( :f !l'+ 'J .5iJ 1.6'+ • P!:. i1s~.i;~ OE'SCP.JF'T JON STEEL STOCK WELD ING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES FILM PROCESSING ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ANNEXATION 8120 PROCESSING FEE BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION PLANT #2 SECURITY PATROL TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS FREIGHT CHLORINE SHALL HARDWARE PIPE SUPPLHS WATER USEAGE SAFETY SUPPLIES CONTROL EQUIPMENT PLANT #2 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE REGULATOR PARTS CONTRACTOR PW-106 HOT OR TRUCK PARTS ENGINE PARTS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANT SHALL HARDWARE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CAUSTIC SODA SALT CHLORINE LAB ANALYSIS COYOTE CANYON GATE FEES REPLENISH WORKERS' COHP. FUND TRAILER RENTAL SAFETY SUPPLIES, FIRST AID SUPPLIES TELEMETER I NG . ENGINE PARTS CONTRACTOR PW-123, P2-26 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES INDUSTRIAL WASTE SAMPLING ICE PUMP PARTS TRUCK PARTS CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING PIPE SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES (, I I 1 . I 1• • l: ::: bj I ---::: ( F Ul\O f\C ~! l. Pf< ,At.; T f\: 0 • lf,9771 fl(.'1772 u6c:i11~ rf>c-•7H 1it c; 77~ r·"..-;1n tlf:CI 77 7 :1f ?77P. (169779 fl( '511' ii IJf, I:, "/l: J r1 f97f2 ,·,l c;JR3 '•f· C:7Plf jlf c; 7f5 :,f; q 7 ~6 G647P.7 Of.-C'Jfl' [If, q 7 [I Cl f.f. c,. 7 qO t'b" 791 f,f. C 7r;2 i;c,q7:;~ 1:~ 0 7'7lf t'f.., 75!"J •)f. C. 7c,b l-f'":7C:7 f'( 'I 75~ ( f,a79q 1f<:srri o':f>C, 8 (' J il(,'U:-G:' "•( '?f 03 fl(,c•~H4 ~if Gp(!' i f: ·~~fl ( .If,~·(:{, 7 ~· (.. ~-f~ ,, ~' !' l: ';·fl {1<; t: f. <;, f4 l G d ~ Hl l ~· (· '1 r1 J? 1: t: '.ii;' 13 .I(~ C.t F. l q r. f c; P.] !:· ;)£>~ ... }{, I • . ( 9199 -Jl DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING OAT[ 6/22/A~ rAGl REPORT ~UMBER AP43 " COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY C.LAIM~. ~.!'10 ___ 0_~/~}/8-'+ VENDOR REYNOL~ ~LLMINU~ SUPPLY CO. ROr1tHNS f. f4( YEPS POCCO'S TRUCK ~IP[CKJtlG _ ROSO'.OUf\Te INC. ~t.NCCN INC. SANO UCLL~R fUSl~rss FOR~S S .Hd ~ /.NA CIC(lGf SA~TA ANA [L£CT~IC MOTO~S ~AR~E~T-WELC~ SCJ[NTIFIC CC. SlAL BLAC~ . S tlA r-' R 0 ( K SU f' Fl Y SH J Ht FI Pl &. SUH'l Y t I NC !OLAR TUR~JNES INl(RN~TJC~AL SO. CO~ST AIP r.UALITY HANAGEHENT DISTRICT sour~ C0~5T OFFICE EGUJP~ENT ~out~E~N CALI~. EbtsbN ro. SO. CAL. EAS CO• SOUTPERN COUNTlf.S OIL CO. SF~GKLETTS DRINKING WATfR ~TtfL f~C~AN~[, JNC. SUH fl Cl-!lt' CONJ' ~UPERll\l[fl.C[NT OF ~CCU~E~TS lHf SUHL HRS SYf!RGN • CASH£ ~lHr.IGLlf\E co. T ,,HOR ·C'Ul\N mo~ Hf!.FCR~flY f,ERVIC£.S TRAVfl PUFFS TRUCK g AUTn SUPPLY. I~c. lUf~t:SAl£S J.G. TUCKER ~ SOI\, INC. IJ.S. CCti.Hltd-'.~ UNl1£0 PARCEL srRvICE UNITED ~TAlfS fGUl~~£NT CO., INC. VWR SCIENTIFIC VALLEY CITIES surrLY co. VALVE & STffL ~UfflY CO. VCTC f'tCnl\f. JOHN P.. wAPLES ~AUKFShA E~GINf SCPVICFNT£R VE~MAP MA~INr ELrCT~ONJCS ~EST CO-ST INSTALLATJO"S ~(STCGAST ~CTORt l~C. ~[STl~GHOCSf fLECTHJC CO~P ~HIT£, Fifi.£ ~ VERVILLE X(ROX COf(F. AMOUNT $I,q22.22 i5M .f.2 s.~:sp .. co $31l9.fi3 s.&ao.oo U53ef>8 !2?9.93 S2t't26.lf0 $?.0. lj'I ·-·ii" 5. 7s Slt168.32 f.672.61 $9H .23 $5t146. 00 S8f'.7.4lf s9i,3~n~3s U3,70'te16 $J8t612.8'+ f055.50 $2,513.54 SltJ'>3.l~ i3o!i.oo $1,1153.'H Uq't.GC t.'1A.Ii1 S.9(). 9'i . t 0 36 ll. IJ Ct. $517.110 t.l .~12<:J.9!) $1,()(•5.51 Slt21fl'J.2C $2tl3.C4 $3J.75 if,aqq .4~ - S.2t265.0A !.lt258.30 s.3, .1i 'l7. 2 o $5f'H~.CG :1-'t •Jl. ~ c s2,i'+ild9 $45~.18 $'1"7.50 s1, 1•61. 06 f.l tB't8.fi5 U d2A.1~ s3.i't5.55 OC:f.CRJf'TJON STEEL STOCK PUHP PARTS TRUCK PARTS ENGiNE PARTS CSDOC 17 HANHOLE REPAIRS OFFICE FORHS TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIRS LAD SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES PAINT SUPPLIES, TOOLS PIPE SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS PERMIT FEES OFF I CE FURNITURE POWER NATURAL GAS DIESEL FUEL BOTTLED WATER STEEL STOCK SOLVENTS FEDERAL REGISTER RENEWAL ENr.INE PARTS/TOOLS/SHALL HARDWARE LAB EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OFFICE HACHINE REPAIRS ELECTRIC CART PARTS TEMPORARY HELP AIR FARE TRUCK PARTS PIPE SUPPLIES HOSE STORAGE DRUM DELIVERY SERVICE COHPRESSOR PARTS LAB SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLIES VALVES ENGINE REPAIRS ODOR CONSULTANT ENGINE PARTS LAB SUPPLIES FURNITURE REPAIRS PUHP PARTS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES DEEP OCEAN SLUDGE DISPOSAL STUDY XEROX REPRODUCTION ( . I : I j·I .. , ·:: I i · 1 I! . I , I ; I . I .. , :.! ii ; i ! I ! I : ! . I ! '• , I i • FUND f\O 519° -Jl [JST ~ORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/22/84 P~GE PEPORT NUHefR AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE crUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/27/84 ~JAf?RAU ~o. \lfl'WCR ::: o:J I V1 ::: '.1 f.'H·J7 7IP TEHPORAPY f[R~ONNFL SUHHARY HI OPER FUND #I ACO FUND #2 OPER FUND #2 F/R FUND 113 OPER FUND #3 F/R FUtfD //5 OPER FUND #6 ACO FUND #7 OPER FUND H7 ACO FUHD #II OPER FUND #13 ACO FUND 65&6 OPER FUND 65£6 ACO fUND #6£ 7 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF TOTAL r.l~JMS PAID ~6/27/84 SELF FUNDED WORKERS' COHP. INSURANCE FUND JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/27/84 ( AMOUNT Sl31.5c t801,329.56 ================= AMOUNT _ $ 3.68 655.05 180.05 t,71,. 32 10,65~.75 37. 55 3, Ol, I. 03 655.05 2,031.52 674. 90 696.74 812. 42 - 2,396.40 It. 072. 00 22.87 335,1t17.28 375,346. 1-3 2,250.06 61,907.76 $801,329.56 ( or SCfH PT I ON TEMPORARY HELP . •-· 'l . : i ~. i 1) ..., (}